2
0
1
7
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
I
F
I
R
S
T
M
D
W
E
S
T
B
A
N
C
O
R
P,
I
N
C
.
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
2017 ANNUAL REPORT FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
One Pierce Place, Suite 1500, Itasca, IL 60143 | 630.875.7450 | FirstMidwest.com
2320-8-305 4/18
9680_Cover.indd 1
3/29/18 9:05 PM
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.1STOCKHOLDER INFORMATIONFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc. common stock is traded in the Global Select Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol FMBI. Anticipated dividend payable dates are in January, April, July, and October, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.Stockholders may have their dividends deposited directly to their savings, checking, or money market account at any financial institution. Information concerning Dividend Direct Deposit may be obtained from the Company or our transfer agent.Stockholders may fully or partially reinvest dividends and invest up to $5,000 quarterly in First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. common stock without incurring any brokerage fees. Information concerning dividend reinvestment and stock purchase may be obtained from the Company or our transfer agent.Stockholders with inquiries regarding stock accounts, dividends, change of ownership or address, lost certificates, consolidation of accounts, or registering shares electronically through the Direct Registration System should contact our transfer agent via the following:Phone: (888) 581-9376Correspondence:Mail:ComputershareP.O. Box 505005Louisville, KY 40233-5005Web:www.computershare.com/investorInvestor RelationsFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc.One Pierce Place, Suite 1500Itasca, Illinois 60143(630) 875-7533investor.relations@firstmidwest.comFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc. files an annual report on Form 10-K and three quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Requests for these reports and other Company filings and general inquiries regarding stock and dividend information, quarterly earnings, and news releases may be directed to Investor Relations at the above address or can be obtained through the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website, www.FirstMidwest.com/InvestorRelations.This report, including the letter to stockholders contained in this report, may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “probable,” “potential,” “possible,” “target,” “continue,” “look forward,” or “assume” and words of similar import. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead express only management’s beliefs regarding future results or events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of management’s control. It is possible that actual results and events may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results or events indicated in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution you not to place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements contained in the letter to stockholders are made only as of the date of the letter, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in the letter to reflect new information or events or conditions. These statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. For a discussion of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should refer to the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as well as our subsequent filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, these risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. Other sections of such reports describe additional factors that could impact our business and financial performance.COMMON STOCKDIVIDEND PAYMENTSDIRECT DEPOSITDIVIDEND REINVESTMENT/STOCK PURCHASETRANSFER AGENT/STOCKHOLDER SERVICESINVESTOR ANDSTOCKHOLDER CONTACTSEC REPORTS ANDGENERAL INFORMATIONFORWARD-LOOKINGSTATEMENTSOvernight:Computershare462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600Louisville, KY 40202Online Inquiries:https://www-us.computershare.com/investor/contactAs of May 2018:8750 W. Bryn Mawr AvenueSuite 1300Chicago, Illinois 606319680_Cover.indd 23/29/18 9:05 PM 1COMPANY PROFILE First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. is a relationship-focused financial institution headquartered in the Chicago suburb of Itasca, Illinois. We are one of Illinois’ largest independent publicly-traded bank holding companies. Our principal subsidiary, First Midwest Bank, and other affiliates provide a full range of commercial, treasury management, equipment leasing, retail, wealth management, trust and private banking products and services to commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, municipal, and consumer clients. We do so through over 130 locations in metropolitan Chicago, northwest Indiana, central and western Illinois, and eastern Iowa. Our service areas include a mixture of urban, suburban, and rural markets that contain a diversified mix of industry groups, including manufacturing, health care, pharmaceutical, higher education, wholesale and retail trade, service, and agriculture. We have over $14 billion in assets and approximately $11 billion in trust assets under management. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the people and businesses in the communities where we live and work. We seek to be our clients’ most trusted financial partner and to help our clients achieve financial success.ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONVisit the Investor Relations section of our website, FirstMidwest.com/InvestorRelations, for stock and dividend information, quarterly earnings and news releases, online annual reports, links to SEC filings, and other Company information.NEW HEADQUARTERS LOCATIONIn May 2018, we will be relocating our headquarters to 8750 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60631, in Chicago’s O’Hare corridor.9680_Insert.indd 13/29/18 10:28 PM STOCKHOLDERS LETTER 4.9.20182To Our Stockholders, 2017 was a transformational year for First Midwest – one in which our multi-year efforts to expand and diversify our business was clearly evident. The First Midwest of today is stronger than ever with the talent, products, geographic reach and scale necessary to deliver value to our clients and, by extension, stockholders. This value, we believe, extends from our collective commitment to helping our clients achieve financial success. As we work to build a larger, more diverse business, we continue to strengthen our leadership. Over the past two years, we have added talent and experience to our executive and senior management teams across our business. The underlying transitions have been smooth, providing new experience and perspectives. As a result, we entered 2017 with not only the momentum of 2016 as a tailwind but also having prepared ourselves to accelerate our business growth and navigate the greater regulatory costs and expectations attendant to growing beyond $10 billion in assets. In early January 2017, we closed on our acquisition of Standard Bancshares, Inc. (“Standard”), the largest in our 35-year history, and proceeded to successfully combine our teams, clients and operating systems. In February, we opportunistically acquired Premier Asset Management LLC (“Premier”) which, along with Standard, expanded our wealth management services and added approximately $1 billion in trust assets under management. Through these acquisitions, we further strengthened our position as a market leader in metro Chicago and became Illinois’ 3rd largest provider of wealth management services.Our financial performance in 2017 was reflective of this transformation and, as expected, the significant transitional costs attendant to execution and building future momentum. The magnitude and timing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also greatly impacted our 2017 results, requiring us to revalue our deferred tax assets downward and opportunistically execute on strategies to maximize the differential tax benefits going forward. These actions weighed on 2017 performance, while creating significant earnings momentum for 2018 and beyond as we benefit from both growth and lower corporate tax rates. First Midwest closed the year at $14.1 billion in assets, a level 23% greater than 2016. Certain costs, such as those attendant to acquisitions as well as tax reform, significantly impacted reported earnings for both 2017 and 2016. After adjusting for these costs, earnings totaled $136.6 million or $1.35 per share in 2017. This underlying operating performance represents meaningful improvement of 41% and 11%, respectively. EARNINGS PER SHAREEarnings per shareEarnings per share, adjusted20162017$ 0 . 96$ 1. 35$1. 1 42015$1. 05$ 1. 1 3$ 1. 22Michael L. ScudderChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc.9680_Insert.indd 23/28/18 12:22 AM 3(continued)We therefore look to 2018 with heightened optimism, ready to build on the investments of 2017. Operating leverage, higher interest rates as well as the benefits of lower corporate taxes are expected to expand earnings and further strengthen capital. As a result, we are well-positioned for continued investment in our business and colleagues to better deliver on our promise to our clients – helping them achieve financial success. Toward that aim, in early 2018, we launched “Delivering Excellence.” This company-wide initiative represents a natural progression to leverage colleagues, technology and scale to provide an even better client experience as well as a more efficient platform for growth. By doing so, we further our commitment to our clients and enhance the value of our business all of which inures to the long-term benefit of our stockholders.2017 PERFORMANCE Performance in 2017 benefited from sales success across business lines as well as our strategic acquisitions of Standard and Premier. Reported earnings for 2017 increased 7% to $98.4 million while earnings per share declined by 16% to $.96 per share. Both 2017 and 2016 were impacted by certain significant costs, largely attendant to business acquisitions as well as tax reform. These costs totaled $39.1 million and $5.9 million net of tax in 2017 and 2016 respectively, making operating comparisons difficult. Adjusting for their impact offers better perspective on 2017’s underlying operating performance and 2018’s momentum. On this same basis, our return on tangible common equity improved some 160 basis points to 13.1% and represented a level of performance amongst the top of our peers. This level of performance reflects the hard work and focus of our colleagues. Their achievements during the year, even more impressive against a backdrop of accelerated growth, demonstrate their commitment and are highlighted by:The addition of $2.6 billion in assets, over $300 million in trust assets under management, 65,000 clients and 300 colleagues through our acquisition of Standard. The successful integration of colleagues and clients to our existing operating platform strengthened our teams, provided improved operating efficiency an greatly enhanced our position as a market leader in metro Chicago. Robust and diverse loan growth. Loans outstanding increased approximately 7% away from acquired growth, largely on the strength of expanded commercial and consumer lending. A strong core deposit foundation. Core deposits comprise 85% of total deposits. The mix and granularity of this important funding source serve as a meaningful performance advantage as interest rates move higher. A market-leading wealth management business.In February 2017, we acquired Premier, which added $550 million in trust assets under management to our wealth management business. Further aided by Standard and strong organic sales, wealth revenues for 2017 increased 25% from 2016 and assets under management grew to nearly $11 billion. . . . we are well-positioned for continued investment in our business and our colleagues to better deliver on our promise to our clients –helping them achieve financial success. 9680_Insert.indd 33/29/18 10:28 PM 4STOCKHOLDERS LETTER 4.9.2018An improved and more flexible capital foundation. Expanded earnings and proactive management have quickly replenished and strengthened our capital foundation following our acquisitions of Standard and Premier. As a result, we closed 2017 with regulatory capital levels at or higher than we ended 2016. In February 2018, we were therefore pleased to announce a 10% increase in our quarterly cash dividend to $.11 per share, demonstrating our confidence in the Company and our business strategy. This represents the 141st consecutive cash dividend paid by First Midwest since its inception in 1983.The successful expansion of our risk management process and handling of heightened regulatory expectations. In 2017, we successfully navigated the various regulatory requirements and expectations for an institution greater than $10 billion in assets. We supplemented our risk governance structure, formally chartering the Enterprise Risk Committee of the Board as well as successfully expanded our capital management process to comply with the prescriptive stress testing requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Separately, our performance for 2017 absorbed the loss of $6 million in revenues over the 2nd half of 2017 as mandated by the regulatory limits on debit card interchange fees. CELEBRATING OUR PAST AS WE LOOK TO OUR FUTURE In 2018, we celebrate 35 years as First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. The accomplishments over these many years stand as a testament to not only the foresight of our founders but also the many contributions of our colleagues and collective mission to help clients achieve financial success. Our relationship-based approach to banking has been a long-standing strength that has served our clients, communities and stockholders well.First Midwest’s longevity is rooted in this mission, listening to our clients and adapting to their needs – delivering what they define success to be versus what we believe it to be. In some ways, we are a different Company today, larger, with greater business diversity and geographic reach. But at the same time, our beliefs and values have not changed. This willingness to listen, adapt, and deliver the service excellence our clients expect from us has and continues to set First Midwest apart from our competition. We are very proud of the part we have played in helping our clients and serving our communities over these many years. At the same time, we have never been a company that rests on our laurels. Current business momentum positions us for significant growth in earnings and capital generation over the next year. We also recognize that continuing investment in our business, colleagues and communities are key to future success. 9680_Insert.indd 43/29/18 10:28 PM 5COLLEAGUES AND COMMUNITY INVESTMENT Colleagues and the communities we serve have long stood at the center of our success. We are proud to take an active role in the communities in which we operate, providing leadership and working to make each community a better place to live and conduct business. These words are as true today as they were 35 years ago.Through active involvement, we support organizations across our markets, helping contribute to business growth and retention efforts that enhance economic vitality.Colleagues provide thousands of volunteer hours to a variety of organizations in our communities. Through the Company and the First Midwest Charitable Foundation we provide financial support to many of these same organizations. The organizations we assist provide vital services in our communities and include hospitals, free medical clinics, numerous United Way Agencies and the American Red Cross, to name just a few. We conduct financial literacy programs for individuals through various community groups and have facilitated programs for small businesses as they look to build and expand their business. In 2017, we were very pleased to provide further tangible recognition of the importance of our colleagues and communities through increases to our hourly rate of minimum pay, a special bonus to nearly 85% of our colleagues and a $2 million contribution to the First Midwest Charitable Foundation. “DELIVERING EXCELLENCE”Providing our clients with product and service excellence also requires the continuous pursuit of better ways to deliver those products and services to our clients when and how they need them. Technological advancement and innovation continues to transform the world around us, evolving clients’ expectations and needs while at the same time creating new opportunities to better meet those expectations and needs. Navigating this transformation requires us to continue to do what we have successfully done throughout our history – strive to meet the needs of our clients. First Midwest, as a larger Company, has the ability to leverage the investments we have made and will continue to make in our colleagues, systems and processes to better deliver on our service commitment and create opportunities for growth. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we began work on our “Delivering Excellence” initiative. It represents a multi-year, enterprise-wide effort that, when complete, will expand our ability to enrich our clients’ experience, enhance and improve our delivery of service excellence and drive greater operational efficiency. Its success will solidify our competitive advantage and provide a platform for future growth.BOARD DEVELOPMENTSFirst Midwest’s accomplishments are in no small part the result of the counsel and effectiveness of our Board. 2017 stands as no exception to that effort and reflects the natural board member transitions that occur within a healthy, longstanding company such as First Midwest. In November of 2017, Robert P. O’Meara stepped aside as our Chairman of the Board and recently announced his intent to retire as a director in May of 2018. Bob, over these past 35 years, has helped guide First Midwest from inception to the Company that it has become today, serving as both its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman 9680_Insert.indd 53/29/18 10:28 PM 6STOCKHOLDERS LETTER 4.9.2018of the Board. His contributions are many and his counsel has been invaluable to First Midwest. On behalf of the Company, Board and our colleagues here at First Midwest, I want to take this opportunity to thank Bob for his valued leadership and many years of loyal and dedicated service. Bob has been named Chairman Emeritus of the Company and will continue to serve as a director of First Midwest Bank, so that we may continue to benefit from his substantial banking experience and valued judgment. Responsively, in November, the Board announced my appointment as Chairman of the Board of First Midwest Bancorp and appointed J. Stephen Vanderwoude as Lead Independent Director. Steve, who has served as a Director over the past 25 years, brings significant experience with our Company, our industry and corporate governance to the board. In February of 2018, Patrick J. McDonnell, who has served on the Board for the past 11 years, the last 7 as Chairman of our Audit Committee, announced his decision to retire upon the expiration of his term in May of 2018. I would again take this opportunity to acknowledge Pat’s meaningful contributions to our Board and Company and thank him for his loyal and dedicated service. Stephen C. Van Arsdell, who has served as Vice Chair of the Committee since 2016, has been named to serve as Audit Chair following Pat’s retirement.IN CLOSING2017 was a transformational year for our Company. The First Midwest of today remains centered on helping our clients achieve financial success. At the same time, with over $14 billion in assets, 380,000 clients and 2,200 colleagues, our business is larger, more diverse and has greater geographic and economic reach. We enter 2018 with significant underlying earnings momentum, ready to further leverage the investments made in our colleagues and our business over the course of 2016 and 2017.As we look to the future, we continue to take confidence from the success of our past. An unwavering commitment to meeting the needs of our clients has stood at the core of our achievements over these past 35 years. Now, as a larger Company, we are well positioned to leverage the investments we have made and will continue to make in our colleagues, systems and processes. By doing so, we better deliver on our vision to serve as our clients’ most trusted financial partner and provide the service excellence they have come to rely on.The character, engagement and talent that our colleagues bring to work each day assures me that our future is bright and positions us well to deliver long term value to you, our stockholders. As always, I am most appreciative of your confidence and investment in First Midwest. Michael L. Scudder, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.9680_Insert.indd 63/29/18 10:29 PM BOARD COMMITTEES(1) Audit Committee (2) Compensation Committee (3) Enterprise Risk Committee (4) Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (5) Advisory Committee7Michael L. Scudder (5)Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Barbara A. Boigegrain (2, 4, 5)Chief Executive Officerand General Secretary Wespath Benefits and Investments(Pension, Health and Welfare Benefit Trustee and Administrator)Thomas L. Brown (1, 3)Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer RLI Corp. (Specialty Insurance Company) Brother James Gaffney, FSC (2, 4, 5)President EmeritusLewis University(Catholic and Lasallian University) Phupinder S. Gill (1, 3)Former Chief Executive OfficerCME Group Inc.(Global Derivatives Marketplace and Exchange)Kathryn J. Hayley (1, 2)Chief Executive Officer Rosewood Advisory Services, LLC Former Executive Vice President UnitedHealthcare (Diversified Healthcare Company) Peter J. Henseler (2, 4)PresidentTOMY International(Toys and Infant Products Designerand Marketer) Patrick J. McDonnell (1, 3, 5)President and Chief Executive OfficerThe McDonnell Company LLCFormer Partner andDirector of Global AssurancePricewaterhouseCoopers LLP(Accounting Firm)Frank B. Modruson (1, 3)President Modruson & Associates, LLC Former Partner andChief Information Officer Accenture plc (Professional Services Firm) Robert P. O’Meara Retired Chairman of the BoardFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc.Ellen A. Rudnick (2, 4)Senior Advisor and AdjunctProfessor of EntrepreneurshipUniversity of Chicago Booth School of Business(Private University)Mark G. Sander Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc.Michael J. Small (1, 3)Former President and Chief Executive OfficerGogo, Inc.(Airborne Communications Service Provider) Stephen C. Van Arsdell (1, 4) Former Senior Partner, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Deloitte & Touche LLP (Accounting Firm)J. Stephen Vanderwoude (3, 4, 5)Lead Independent DirectorFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc.Former Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMadison River Communications Corp.(Operator of Rural Telephone Companies)BOARD OF DIRECTORS - FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.9680_Insert.indd 73/27/18 9:35 PM 8Michael L. ScudderChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMark G. SanderVice Chairman of the Board and PresidentPatrick S. BarrettExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerJo Ann BoylanExecutive Vice President andChief Information and Operations OfficerKathleen S. CarrollExecutive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Nicholas J. ChulosExecutive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Robert P. DiedrichExecutive Vice President and Director of Wealth ManagementJames P. HotchkissExecutive Vice President and Treasurer Michael W. JamiesonExecutive Vice President andDirector of Commercial BankingJeff C. NewcomExecutive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer Thomas M. PrameExecutive Vice President and Director ofStrategic Planning and Consumer BankingMichael C. SpitlerExecutive Vice President and Chief Credit OfficerJames V. StadlerExecutive Vice President and Chief Marketing and Communications OfficerAngela L. PutnamSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerEXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP - FIRST MIDWEST BANKMichael L. ScudderChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerMark G. SanderSenior Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Operating OfficerPatrick S. BarrettExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerJo Ann BoylanExecutive Vice President andChief Information and Operations OfficerKathleen S. CarrollExecutive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Nicholas J. ChulosExecutive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary James P. HotchkissExecutive Vice President and TreasurerJeff C. NewcomExecutive Vice President and Chief Risk OfficerEXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP - FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.9680_Insert.indd 83/27/18 9:35 PM UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X]
[ ]
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
or
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-10967
(cid:3)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
36-3161078
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
One Pierce Place, Suite 1500
Itasca, Illinois 60143-1254
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (630) 875-7463
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common stock, $0.01 Par Value
Name of each exchange on which registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and
"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [X]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Accelerated filer [ ]
Smaller reporting company [ ]
Emerging growth company [ ]
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with
any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X].
The aggregate market value of the registrant's outstanding voting common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2017, determined using a per
share closing price on that date of $23.31, as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market, was $2,331,611,351.
As of February 23, 2018, there were 103,007,554 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I
ITEM 1.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
Part II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9B.
Part III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.
Part IV
ITEM 15.
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters,
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . .
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . .
Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
3
14
27
27
27
27
28
31
32
73
75
139
139
141
141
142
142
142
142
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
143
147
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us," or "our") is a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1982 and
headquartered in the Chicago suburb of Itasca, Illinois. The Company is one of Illinois' largest independent publicly-traded bank
holding companies, with assets of $14.1 billion as of December 31, 2017, and is registered under the Bank Holding Company Act
of 1956, as amended (the "BHC Act"). The Company's common stock, $0.01 par value per share ("Common Stock"), is listed on
the NASDAQ Stock Market and trades under the symbol "FMBI."
In 1983, the Company became a bank holding company through the simultaneous acquisition of over 20 affiliated financial
institutions. Our principal subsidiary, First Midwest Bank (the "Bank"), is an Illinois state-chartered bank and provides a broad
range of commercial, retail, treasury management, and wealth management products and services to commercial and industrial,
commercial real estate, municipal, and consumer customers. The Bank operates primarily throughout the Chicago metropolitan
area as well as northwest Indiana, central and western Illinois, and eastern Iowa, through 135 banking locations.
The Company maintains a philosophy that focuses on helping its customers achieve financial success through its long-standing
commitment to delivering highly-personalized service. The Company has grown and expanded its market footprint by opening
new locations, growing existing locations, enhancing its internet and mobile capabilities, and acquiring financial institutions,
branches, and non-banking organizations. As of December 31, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries employed a total of 2,152
full-time equivalent employees.
Subsidiaries
The Company is responsible for the overall conduct, direction, and performance of its subsidiaries. In addition, the Company
provides various services to its subsidiaries, establishes policies and procedures, and provides other resources as needed, including
capital. As of December 31, 2017, the following were the Company's primary subsidiaries:
First Midwest Bank
The Bank, through its predecessors, has provided banking services for over 75 years and offers a variety of financial products and
services that are designed to meet the financial needs of the customers and communities it serves. As of December 31, 2017, the
Bank had total assets of $14.0 billion, total loans of $10.4 billion, and total deposits of $11.2 billion.
The Bank operates the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:
•
•
•
•
•
First Midwest Equipment Finance Co. ("FMEF"), an Illinois corporation providing equipment loans and leases and
commercial financing alternatives to traditional bank financing.
First Midwest Securities Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company managing investment securities.
Synergy Property Holdings, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company managing the majority of the Bank's other real
estate owned ("OREO") properties.
Plank Road, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company acquired during 2016 that manages certain of the Bank's OREO
properties.
First Midwest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation managing investment securities, principally municipal obligations,
and providing corporate management services to its wholly-owned subsidiary, FMB Investments Ltd., a Bermuda
corporation. FMB Investments Ltd. manages investment securities.
• The Boulevard, Inc., an Indiana corporation acquired during 2017 that provides insurance brokerage services to individual
and institutional customers.
Catalyst Asset Holdings, LLC
Catalyst Asset Holdings, LLC ("Catalyst"), an Illinois limited liability company, manages certain non-performing assets of the
Company. Catalyst has one wholly-owned subsidiary, Restoration Asset Management, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company
that manages Catalyst's OREO properties.
Premier Asset Management LLC
Premier Asset Management, LLC ("Premier"), an Illinois limited liability company, is a registered investment advisor under the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940. Premier provides wealth management services to individual and institutional customers.
3
First Midwest Capital Trust I, Great Lakes Statutory Trust II, and Great Lakes Statutory Trust III
First Midwest Capital Trust I ("FMCT"), a Delaware statutory business trust, was formed in 2003. Great Lakes Statutory Trust II
("GLST II") and Great Lakes Statutory Trust III ("GLST III") are Delaware statutory business trusts formed in 2005 and 2007,
respectively, that were acquired through an acquisition. These trusts were established for the purpose of issuing trust-preferred
securities and lending the proceeds to the Company in return for junior subordinated debentures of the Company. The Company
guarantees payments of distributions on the trust-preferred securities and payments on redemption of the trust-preferred securities
on a limited basis.
FMCT, GLST II, and GLST III qualify as variable interest entities for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary.
Consequently, the accounts of those entities are not consolidated in the Company's financial statements. However, the combined
$50.7 million in trust-preferred securities held by the three trusts as of December 31, 2017 are included in Tier 1 capital of the
Company for regulatory capital purposes. For additional discussion of the regulatory capital treatment of trust-preferred securities,
see the section of this Item 1 titled "Capital Requirements" below.
Segments
The Company has one reportable segment. The Company's chief operating decision maker evaluates the operations of the Company
using consolidated information for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.
Our Business
The Bank has been in the business of commercial and retail banking for over 75 years, attracting deposits, making loans, and
providing treasury and wealth management services. The Bank operates in the most active and diverse markets in Illinois, including
the metropolitan Chicago market and central and western Illinois. The Bank's other market areas include northwestern Indiana
and eastern Iowa. These areas encompass urban, suburban, and rural markets, and contain a diversified mix of industry groups.
No individual or single group of related accounts is considered material in relation to the assets or deposits of the Bank or in
relation to the overall business of the Company. The Bank does not engage in any sub-prime lending, nor does it engage in
investment banking activities.
Deposit and Retail Services
The Bank offers a full range of deposit products and services, including checking, NOW, money market, and savings accounts
and various types of short and long-term certificates of deposit. These products are tailored to our market areas at competitive
rates. In addition to these products, the Bank offers debit and automated teller machine ("ATM") cards, credit cards, internet and
mobile banking, telephone banking, and financial education services.
Corporate and Consumer Lending
The Bank originates commercial and industrial, agricultural, commercial real estate, and consumer loans, primarily to businesses
and residents in the Bank's market areas. In addition to originating loans, the Bank offers capital market products to commercial
customers, which include derivatives and interest rate risk mitigation products. The Bank's largest category of lending is commercial
real estate, followed by commercial and industrial. For detailed information regarding the Company's loan portfolio, see the "Loan
Portfolio and Credit Quality" section of "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Commercial and Industrial and Agricultural Loans
The Bank provides commercial and industrial loans to middle market businesses generally located in the Chicago metropolitan
area. Our broad range of financing products includes working capital loans and lines of credit, accounts receivable financing,
inventory and equipment financing, and select sector-based lending, such as healthcare, asset-based lending, structured finance,
and syndications. The Bank provides agricultural loans to meet seasonal production, equipment, and farm real estate borrowing
needs of individual and corporate crop and livestock producers.
Commercial Real Estate Loans
The Bank provides a wide array of financing products to developers, investors, other real estate professionals, and owners of
various businesses, which include funding for the construction, purchase, refinance, or improvement of commercial real estate
properties. The mix of properties securing the loans in the Bank's commercial real estate portfolio are balanced between owner-
occupied and investor categories and are diverse in terms of type and geographic location, generally within the Bank's markets.
4
Consumer Loans
Consumer loan products include mortgages, home equity lines and loans, personal loans, specialty loans, and auto loans. These
products are generally provided to the residents who live and work within the Bank's market areas.
Treasury Management
Our treasury management products and services provide commercial customers the ability to manage cash flow. These products
include receivable services such as Automated Clearing House ("ACH") collections, lockbox, remote deposit capture, and financial
electronic data interchange, payables and payroll services such as wire transfer, account reconciliation, controlled disbursement,
direct deposit, and positive pay, information reporting services, liquidity management, corporate credit cards, fraud prevention,
and merchant services.
Wealth Management
The Bank's wealth management group and Premier provide investment management services to institutional and individual
customers, including corporate and public retirement plans, foundations and endowments, high net worth individuals, and multi-
employer trust funds. Services include fiduciary and executor services, financial planning solutions, investment advisory services,
employee benefit plans, and private banking services. These services are provided through credentialed investment, legal, tax, and
wealth management professionals who identify opportunities and provide services tailored to our customers' goals and objectives.
Growth and Acquisitions
In the normal course of business, the Company explores potential opportunities for expansion in our core markets and adjacent
areas through organic growth and the acquisition of banking and non-banking organizations. As a matter of policy, the Company
generally does not comment on any dialogue or negotiations with potential targets or possible acquisitions until a definitive
acquisition agreement is signed. The Company's ability to engage in certain merger or acquisition transactions depends on the
bank regulators' views at the time as to the capital levels, quality of management, and overall condition of the Company, in addition
to their assessment of a variety of other factors. The Company has announced and successfully completed a number of acquisitions,
which include the following recent transactions:
During 2017, the Company completed the acquisitions of Standard Bancshares, Inc. ("Standard"), the holding company for Standard
Bank and Trust Company, and Premier, a registered investment advisor.
During 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of NI Bancshares Corporation ("NI Bancshares"), the holding company for
The National Bank & Trust Company of Sycamore.
During 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. ("Peoples"), the holding company for The Peoples'
Bank of Arlington Heights.
During 2014, the Company completed the acquisitions of the Chicago area banking operations of Banco Popular North America
("Popular"), doing business as Popular Community Bank, the south suburban Chicago-based Great Lakes Financial Resources,
Inc. ("Great Lakes"), the holding company for Great Lakes Bank, National Association, and National Machine Tool Financial
Corporation ("National Machine Tool"), now known as FMEF.
Additional detail regarding certain recent acquisitions is contained in Note 3 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements"
in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Competition
The banking and financial services industry in the markets in which the Company operates (and particularly the Chicago
metropolitan area) is highly competitive. Generally, the Company competes with other local, regional, national, and internet banks
and savings and loan associations, personal loan and finance companies, credit unions, mutual funds, credit funds, and investment
brokers.
Competition is driven by a number of factors, including interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits, the ability to attract
new deposits, the scope and type of banking and financial services offered, the hours during which business can be conducted,
the location of bank branches and ATMs, the availability, ease of use, and range of banking services provided on the internet and
through mobile devices, the availability of related services, and a variety of additional services, such as wealth management
services.
In providing investment advisory services, the Company also competes with retail and discount stockbrokers, investment advisors,
mutual funds, insurance companies, and other financial institutions for wealth management customers. Competition is generally
based on the variety of products and services offered to customers and the performance of funds under management. The Company's
5
main competitors are financial service providers both within and outside of the geographic areas in which the Company maintains
offices.
The Company faces competition in attracting and retaining qualified employees. Its ability to continue to compete effectively will
depend on its ability to attract new employees and retain and motivate existing employees.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property is important to the success of our business. We own a variety of trademarks, service marks, trade names, and
logos and spend time and resources maintaining our intellectual property portfolio. We control access to our intellectual property
through license agreements, confidentiality procedures, non-disclosure agreements with third-parties, employment agreements,
and other contractual arrangements protecting our intellectual property.
Supervision and Regulation
The Bank is an Illinois state-chartered bank and a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve") has the primary federal authority to examine and supervise the Bank in coordination with
the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the "IDFPR"). The Company is a single bank holding company
and is also subject to the primary regulatory authority of the Federal Reserve. The Company and its subsidiaries are also subject
to extensive secondary regulation and supervision by various state and federal governmental regulatory authorities, including the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), which insures deposits and assets covered by loss share agreements with the
FDIC (the "FDIC Agreements"), and the United States ("U.S.") Department of the Treasury (the "Treasury"), which enforces
money laundering and currency transaction regulations. As a public company, the Company is also subject to the regulatory
authority of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act").
Federal and state laws and regulations generally applicable to financial institutions regulate the Company's and the subsidiaries'
scope of business, investments, reserves against deposits, capital levels, the nature and amount of collateral for loans, the
establishment of branches, mergers, acquisitions, dividends, and other matters. This supervision and regulation is intended primarily
for the protection of the FDIC's deposit insurance fund ("DIF"), a bank's depositors, and the stability of the U.S. financial system,
rather than the stockholders of a financial institution.
The following sections describe the significant elements of the material statues and regulations affecting the Company and its
subsidiaries, some of which are not yet effective or remain subject to ongoing revision and rulemaking.
The regulations, policies, and supervisory guidance applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, and the manner in which
market practices and structures develop around such regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. Recent political developments have added additional uncertainty to the implementation, scope,
and timing of these regulatory reforms. The Company cannot accurately predict the nature or the extent of the effects that any
such developments will have on its business and earnings or its competitors. These and other risks are discussed in more detail in
Item 1A, "Risk Factors" of this Form 10-K.
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
Generally, the BHC Act governs the acquisition and control of banks and non-banking companies by bank holding companies and
requires bank holding companies to register with the Federal Reserve. The BHC Act requires a bank holding company to file an
annual report of its operations and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require. A bank holding company and
its subsidiaries are subject to examination and supervision by the Federal Reserve.
The BHC Act, the Bank Merger Act, and other federal and state statutes regulate acquisitions of commercial banks. The BHC Act
requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve for the direct or indirect acquisition by a bank holding company of more than
5.0% of the voting shares of a commercial bank or its holding company. Under the BHC Act or the Bank Merger Act, the prior
approval of the Federal Reserve or other appropriate bank regulatory authority is required for a bank holding company to acquire
another bank or for a member bank to merge with another bank or purchase the assets or assume the deposits of another bank. In
reviewing applications seeking approval of merger and acquisition transactions, the bank regulatory authorities will consider,
among other things, the competitive effect and public benefits of the transactions, the capital position of the combined organization,
the risks to the stability of the U.S. banking or financial system, the applicant's managerial and financial resources, the applicant's
performance record under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the "CRA"), fair housing laws and other
consumer compliance laws, and the effectiveness of the banks in combating money laundering activities.
In addition, the BHC Act prohibits (with certain exceptions) a bank holding company from acquiring direct or indirect control or
ownership, or control of more than 5.0% of the voting shares of any "non-banking" company unless the non-banking activities
6
are found by the Federal Reserve to be "so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto." Under current regulations
of the Federal Reserve, a bank holding company and its non-bank subsidiaries are permitted to engage in such banking-related
business ventures as consumer finance, equipment leasing, data processing, mortgage banking, financial and investment advice,
securities brokerage services, and other activities.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, as amended (the "GLB Act"), allows certain bank holding companies to elect to be treated
as a financial holding company (an "FHC") that may offer customers a more comprehensive array of financial products and
services. Such products and services may include insurance and securities underwriting and agency activities, merchant banking,
and certain investment management activities. Activities that are "complementary" to financial activities are also authorized. Under
the GLB Act, the Federal Reserve may not permit a company to register or maintain status as an FHC if the company or any of
its insured depository institution subsidiaries are not well-capitalized and well managed. The Federal Reserve may prohibit an
FHC from engaging in otherwise permissible activities at its supervisory discretion. In addition, for an FHC to commence any
new activity permitted by the BHC Act or to acquire a company engaged in any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, each
insured depository institution subsidiary of the FHC must have received a rating of at least "satisfactory" in its most recent
examination under the CRA. The Company has not elected to be an FHC.
Transactions with Affiliates
Any transactions between the Bank and the Company and their respective subsidiaries are regulated by the Federal Reserve. The
Federal Reserve's regulations limit the types and amounts of covered transactions engaged in between the Company and the Bank
and generally require those transactions to be on terms at least as favorable to the Bank as if the transaction were conducted with
an unaffiliated third-party. Covered transactions are defined by statute to include:
• A loan or extension of credit, as well as a purchase of securities issued by an affiliate.
• The purchase of assets from an affiliate, unless otherwise exempted by the Federal Reserve.
• Certain derivative transactions that create a credit exposure to an affiliate.
• The acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate as collateral for a loan.
• The issuance of a guarantee, acceptance, or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate.
In general, these regulations require that any extension of credit by the Bank (or its subsidiaries) with an affiliate must be secured
by designated amounts of specified collateral and must be limited to certain thresholds on an individual and aggregate basis.
The Bank is also limited as to how much and on what terms it may lend to its insiders and the insiders of its affiliates, including
executive officers and directors.
Source of Strength
Federal Reserve policy and federal law require bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to
their subsidiary banks. Under this requirement, a holding company is expected to commit resources to support its bank subsidiary
even at times when the holding company may not be in a financial position to provide such resources or when the holding company
may not be inclined to provide it. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to its subsidiary bank are subordinate in right of
payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy,
any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a bank subsidiary
will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
The CRA requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas consistent with safe and sound
banking practices. Under the CRA, each depository institution is required to help meet the credit needs of its market areas by,
among other things, providing credit to low-income and moderate-income individuals and communities. Federal regulators conduct
CRA examinations on a regular basis to assess the performance of financial institutions and assign one of four ratings to the
institution's record of meeting the credit needs of its community. Banking regulators take into account CRA ratings when considering
approval of a proposed merger or acquisition. As of its last examination report issued in May of 2017, the Bank received a rating
of "outstanding," the highest rating available. The Bank has received an overall "outstanding" rating in each of its CRA performance
evaluations since 1998.
Financial Privacy
Under the GLB Act, a financial institution may not disclose non-public personal information about a consumer to unaffiliated
third-parties unless the institution satisfies various disclosure requirements and the consumer has not elected to opt out of the
information sharing. The financial institution must provide its customers with a notice of its privacy policies and practices. The
Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and other financial regulatory agencies issued regulations implementing notice requirements and
7
restrictions on a financial institution's ability to disclose non-public personal information about consumers to unaffiliated third-
parties.
Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT Act
The Bank Secrecy and USA PATRIOT Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent them from being used
for money laundering, terrorist, and other illegal activities. If such activities are detected or suspected, financial institutions are
obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury's Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules
require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new
accounts. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences, including causing
applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions.
Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation
The U.S. imposes economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals, and others. These
sanctions are administered by the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"). These sanctions include:
(i) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against direct or indirect imports from
and exports to a sanctioned country and prohibitions on "U.S. persons" engaging in financial transactions relating to making
investments in, or providing investment-related advice or assistance to, a sanctioned country, and (ii) a blocking of assets in which
the government or specially designated nationals of the sanctioned country have an interest by prohibiting transfers of property
subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including property in the possession or control of U.S. persons). Blocked assets (e.g., property and
bank deposits) cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off, or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. Failure to comply
with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including causing applicable bank
regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") significantly restructured the financial
regulatory regime in the U.S. Some of the Dodd-Frank Act's provisions, which are described in more detail below, may have the
consequence of increasing the Company's expenses, decreasing the Company's revenues, and changing the activities in which the
Company chooses to engage.
Enhanced Prudential Standards
The Dodd-Frank Act directed the Federal Reserve to monitor emerging risks to financial stability and enact enhanced supervision
and prudential standards applicable to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and non-bank
covered companies designated as systemically important by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (often referred to as
systemically important financial institutions). The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that certain regulatory requirements applicable to
systemically important financial institutions be more stringent than those applicable to other financial institutions.
In February of 2014, the Federal Reserve adopted rules to implement certain of these enhanced prudential standards. These rules
require publicly traded bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets to establish risk committees
and require bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to comply with enhanced liquidity and
overall risk management standards. The Company has established a risk committee in accordance with this requirement.
Consumer Financial Protection
The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") as a new and independent unit within the Federal
Reserve.
The powers of the CFPB currently include primary enforcement and exclusive supervision authority for federal consumer financial
laws over insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or more, such as the Bank, and their affiliates. This includes
the right to obtain information about an institution's activities and compliance systems and procedures and to detect and assess
risks to consumers and markets.
The CFPB engages in several activities including (i) investigating consumer complaints about credit cards and mortgages,
(ii) launching supervisory programs, (iii) conducting research for and developing mandatory financial product disclosures, and
(iv) engaging in consumer financial protection rulemaking.
The Bank is also subject to a number of regulations intended to protect consumers in various areas, such as equal credit opportunity,
fair lending, customer privacy, identity theft, and fair credit reporting. For example, the Bank is subject to the Federal Truth in
Savings Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Electronic banking activities
are subject to federal law, including the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. Wealth management activities of the Bank are subject to
8
the Illinois Corporate Fiduciaries Act. Consumer loans made by the Bank are subject to applicable provisions of the Federal Truth
in Lending Act. Other consumer financial laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act, and applicable state laws.
In addition, state authorities are responsible for monitoring the Company's compliance with all state consumer laws. Failure to
comply with these federal and state requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the Company and
the Bank, including causing applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions.
Interchange Fees
Under the Durbin Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve established a maximum permissible interchange fee
equal to no more than 21 cents plus five basis points of the transaction value for many types of debit interchange transactions.
Interchange fees, or "swipe" fees, are charges that merchants pay to card-issuing banks, such as the Bank, for processing electronic
payment transactions. The Federal Reserve also adopted a rule to allow a debit card issuer to recover one cent per transaction for
fraud prevention purposes if the issuer complies with certain fraud-related requirements required by the Federal Reserve. The
Company is in compliance with these fraud-related requirements. The Federal Reserve also has rules governing routing and
exclusivity that require issuers to offer two unaffiliated networks for routing transactions on each debit or prepaid product. The
interchange fee limitations became effective for the Company on July 1, 2017.
Capital Requirements
The Company and the Bank are each required to comply with applicable capital adequacy standards established by the Federal
Reserve. In July of 2013, the federal bank regulators approved final rules (the "Basel III Capital Rules") implementing the Basel
III framework set forth by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the "Basel Committee") as well as certain provisions of
the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Basel III Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and
depository institutions, including the Company and the Bank, compared to the prior U.S. risk-based capital rules. The Basel III
Capital Rules define the components of capital and address other issues impacting the numerator in banks' regulatory capital ratios.
The Basel III Capital Rules also address risk weights and other issues impacting the denominator in regulatory capital ratios and
replace the existing risk-weighting approach with a more risk-sensitive approach. In addition, the Basel III Capital Rules implement
the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act to remove references to credit ratings from the federal banking agencies'
rules. The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015 (subject to a phase-in
period).
The Basel III Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduce a new capital measure called "Common Equity Tier 1" ("CET1"),
(ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consist of CET1 and "Additional Tier 1 Capital" instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii)
narrowly define CET1 by requiring that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to
the other components of capital, and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions/adjustments compared to existing regulations. Bank
holding companies with less than $15 billion in consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009, such as the Company, are permitted
to include trust-preferred securities in Additional Tier 1 Capital. This treatment is permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 capital even
if the Company should ever exceed $15 billion in consolidated assets due to organic growth. Should the Company exceed $15
billion in consolidated assets as the result of a merger or acquisition, then the Tier 1 treatment of its outstanding trust-preferred
securities will be phased out, but those securities will be treated as Tier 2 capital. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had
$50.7 million of trust-preferred securities included in Tier 1 capital.
When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules will require the Company and the Bank to maintain the
following:
• A minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% "capital conservation buffer" (resulting
in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation).
• A minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (resulting
in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation).
• A minimum ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital
conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation).
• A minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets.
The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio
of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum, but below the conservation buffer, will face constraints on dividends, equity
repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began
9
on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and will be phased in over a four-year period (increasing by that amount on each subsequent
January 1 until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019).
The Basel III Capital Rules also provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1 to be phased-in over a four-
year period through January 1, 2019 (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). In November
of 2017, the Federal Reserve issued a final rule that retained certain existing transition provisions related to deductions from and
adjustments to CET1. Examples of these include the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets depending on
future taxable income, and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that
any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the Basel III
Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive items are included for purposes of determining regulatory
capital ratios; however, the Company and the Bank made a one-time permanent election to exclude these items.
Finally, the Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expanded the risk-weighting categories
from the prior four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of
categories depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities to 600%
for certain equity exposures, resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories.
Management believes that as of December 31, 2017, the Company and the Bank would meet all capital adequacy requirements
under the Basel III Capital Rules on a fully phased-in basis as if such requirements were currently in effect.
In September of 2017, the federal bank regulators proposed to revise and simplify the capital treatment for certain deferred tax
assets, mortgage servicing assets, investments in non-consolidated financial entities and minority interests for banking
organizations, such as the Company and the Bank, that are not subject to the advanced approaches framework. In November of
2017, the federal banking regulators revised the Basel III Rules to extend the current transitional treatment of these items for non-
advanced approaches banking organizations until the September 2017 proposal is finalized. The September 2017 proposal would
also change the capital treatment of certain commercial real estate loans under the standardized approach, which the Company
and the Bank uses to calculate its capital ratios.
In December of 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis
regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as "Basel IV"). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel
Committee's standardized approach for credit risk (including the recalibration of risk weights and introducing new capital
requirements for certain "unconditionally cancellable commitments," such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new
standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the Basel framework, these standards will generally be effective on
January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing in through January 1, 2027. Under the current U.S. capital rules, operational
risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company or the Bank.
The impact of Basel IV on the Company and the Bank will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank
regulators.
Prompt Corrective Action
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended ("FDIA"), requires the federal banking agencies to take "prompt corrective action"
for depository institutions that do not meet the minimum capital requirements. The FDIA includes the following five capital tiers:
"well-capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized" and "critically undercapitalized."
A depository institution's capital tier will depend on how its capital levels compare with various relevant capital measures and
certain other factors, as established by regulation. The relevant capital measures are the total risk-based capital ratio, the Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio, the CET1 capital ratio, and the leverage ratio.
A bank will be:
•
•
•
•
"Well-capitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
of 8.0% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and is not subject to
any order or written directive by any such regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital
measure.
"Adequately capitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 6.0% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and is not "well-
capitalized."
"Undercapitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
of less than 6.0%, a CET1 capital ratio of less than 4.5%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%.
"Significantly undercapitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a CET1 capital ratio of less than 3.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%.
10
•
"Critically undercapitalized" if the institution's tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible
assets.
An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it
is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating for certain matters. A
bank's capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital
category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank's overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.
As of December 31, 2017, the Bank was "well-capitalized" based on its ratios as defined above.
The FDIA prohibits an insured depository institution from accepting brokered deposits or offering interest rates on any deposits
significantly higher than the prevailing rate in the bank's normal market area or nationally (depending upon where the deposits
are solicited), unless it is well capitalized or is adequately capitalized and receives a waiver from the FDIC. A depository institution
that is adequately capitalized and accepts brokered deposits under a waiver from the FDIC may not pay an interest rate on any
deposits in excess of 75 basis points over certain prevailing market areas.
In addition, the FDIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a
dividend) or paying any management fee to its parent holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be
"undercapitalized." "Undercapitalized" institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration
plan. The agencies may not accept such a plan without determining that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to
succeed in restoring the depository institution's capital. In addition, the depository institution's parent holding company must
guarantee that the institution will comply with the capital restoration plan and must also provide appropriate assurances of
performance for a plan to be acceptable. The aggregate liability of the parent holding company is limited to the lesser of an amount
equal to 5.0% of the depository institution's total assets at the time it became undercapitalized and the amount that is necessary
(or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards applicable to the institution as
of the time it fails to comply with the plan. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is
"significantly undercapitalized."
"Significantly undercapitalized" depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including
orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become "adequately capitalized," requirements to reduce total assets, and cessation of
receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. "Critically undercapitalized" institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver
or conservator.
Volcker Rule
The so-called "Volcker Rule" issued under the Dodd-Frank Act, which became effective in July of 2015, restricts the ability of
the Company and its subsidiaries, including the Bank, to sponsor or invest in private funds or to engage in certain types of proprietary
trading. The Company generally does not engage in the businesses prohibited by the Volcker Rule; therefore, the Volcker Rule
does not have a material effect on the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Illinois Banking Law
The Illinois Banking Act ("IBA") governs the activities of the Bank as an Illinois state-chartered bank. Among other things, the
IBA (i) defines the powers and permissible activities of an Illinois state-chartered bank, (ii) prescribes corporate governance
standards, (iii) imposes approval requirements on merger and acquisition activity of Illinois state banks, (iv) prescribes lending
limits, and (v) provides for the examination and supervision of state banks by the IDFPR. The Banking on Illinois Act ("BIA")
amended the IBA to provide a wide range of new activities allowed for Illinois state-chartered banks, including the Bank. The
provisions of the BIA are to be construed liberally to create a favorable business climate for banks in Illinois. The main features
of the BIA are to expand bank powers through a "wild card" provision that authorizes Illinois state-chartered banks to offer virtually
any product or service that any bank or thrift may offer anywhere in the country, subject to restrictions imposed on those other
banks and thrifts, certain safety and soundness considerations, and prior notification to the IDFPR and the FDIC.
Dividends
The Company's primary source of liquidity is dividend payments from the Bank. In addition to requirements to maintain adequate
capital above regulatory minimums, the Bank is limited in the amount of dividends it can pay to the Company under the IBA.
Under the IBA, the Bank is permitted to declare and pay dividends in amounts up to the amount of its accumulated net profits,
provided that it retains in its surplus at least one-tenth of its net profits since the date of the declaration of its most recent dividend
until those additions to surplus, in the aggregate, equal the paid-in capital of the Bank. While it continues its banking business,
the Bank may not pay dividends in excess of its net profits then on hand (after deductions for losses and bad debts). In addition,
the Bank is limited in the amount of dividends it can pay under the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation H. For example, dividends
cannot be paid that would constitute a withdrawal of capital, dividends cannot be declared or paid if they exceed a bank's undivided
11
profits, and a bank may not declare or pay a dividend if all dividends declared during the calendar year are greater than current
year net income plus retained net income of the prior two years without Federal Reserve approval.
Since the Company is a legal entity, separate and distinct from the Bank, its dividends to stockholders are not subject to the bank
dividend guidelines discussed above. However, the Company is subject to other regulatory policies and requirements related to
the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The Federal Reserve
and the IDFPR are authorized to determine that the payment of dividends by the Company would be an unsafe or unsound practice
and to prohibit payment under certain circumstances related to the financial condition of a bank or bank holding company. The
Federal Reserve has taken the position that dividends that would create pressure or undermine the safety and soundness of a
subsidiary bank are inappropriate. Additionally, it is Federal Reserve policy that bank holding companies generally should pay
dividends on common stock only out of net income available to common shareholders over the past year and only if the prospective
rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization's current and expected future capital needs, asset quality and
overall financial condition.
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve's rules require institutions, such as the Company and the Bank, with average
total consolidated assets greater than $10 billion to conduct an annual company-run stress test of capital, consolidated earnings
and losses under one base and at least two stress scenarios provided by the Federal Reserve. The company-run stress tests are
conducted using data as of December 31 of the preceding calendar year and scenarios published by the Federal Reserve. Stress
test results must be reported to the Federal Reserve by July 31 with public disclosure of summary stress test results under the
severely adverse scenario between October 15 and October 31. Our capital ratios reflected in the stress test calculations are an
important factor considered by the Federal Reserve in evaluating the capital adequacy of the Company and the Bank and whether
the appropriateness of any proposed payments of dividends or stock repurchases may be an unsafe or unsound practice. The
Company submitted its first required stress test report for the July 31, 2017 reporting date and the Bank will become subject to
these stress test requirements starting with the July 31, 2018 reporting date.
FDIC Insurance Premiums
The Bank's deposits are insured through the DIF, which is administered by the FDIC. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit
insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require reporting by, FDIC-insured institutions. It may
also prohibit any FDIC-insured institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a
serious risk to the DIF. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution engaged or is
engaging in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or violated any applicable
law, regulation, rule, order, or condition imposed by the FDIC or written agreement entered into with the FDIC.
The FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance premiums based on a risk matrix that takes into account
a bank's capital level and supervisory rating. The risk matrix utilizes four risk categories, which are distinguished by capital levels
and supervisory ratings. For deposit insurance assessment purposes, an insured depository institution is placed into one of the four
risk categories each quarter. An institution's assessment is determined by multiplying its assessment rate by its assessment base,
which is asset based.
In addition, institutions with deposits insured by the FDIC are required to pay assessments to fund interest payments on bonds
issued by the Financing Corporation, a U.S. government-sponsored enterprise established in 1987 to serve as a financing vehicle
for the failed Federal Savings and Loan Association. These assessments will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature
in 2019.
In October of 2010, the FDIC adopted a new DIF restoration plan to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September
30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. In August of 2016, the FDIC announced that the DIF reserve ratio had surpassed
1.15% as of June 30, 2016. As a result, beginning in the third quarter of 2016, the range of initial assessment ranges for all
institutions were adjusted downward such that the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate ranges from 3 to 30 basis points
on an annualized basis. After the effect of potential base-rate adjustments, the total base assessment rate could range from 1.5 to
40 basis points on an annualized basis. In March of 2016, the FDIC adopted a final rule increasing the reserve ratio for the DIF
to 1.35% of total insured deposits.The rule imposes a surcharge on the assessments of depository institutions with $10 billion or
more in assets, including the Bank, beginning in the third quarter of 2016 and continuing through the earlier of the quarter that
the reserve ratio first reaches or exceeds 1.35% and December 31, 2018. Under the rule, if the reserve ratio does not reach 1.35%
by December 31, 2018, the FDIC will impose a shortfall assessment on larger depository institutions, including the Bank.
Depositor Preference
The FDIA provides that, in the event of the "liquidation or other resolution" of an insured depository institution, the claims of
depositors of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative
expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over the other general unsecured claims against the institution. If an insured
depository institution fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured,
12
non-deposit creditors, including depositors whose deposits are payable only outside of the U.S. and the bank holding company,
with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institution.
Employee Incentive Compensation
In 2010, the Federal Reserve, along with the other federal banking agencies, issued guidance applying to all banking organizations
that requires that their incentive compensation policies be consistent with safety and soundness principles. Under this guidance,
financial organizations must review their compensation programs to ensure that they: (i) provide employees with incentives that
appropriately balance risk and reward and that do not encourage imprudent risk, (ii) are compatible with effective controls and
risk management, and (iii) are supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the banking
organization's board of directors. Monitoring methods and processes used by a banking organization should be commensurate
with the size and complexity of the organization and its use of incentive compensation.
During the second quarter of 2016, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies and the SEC proposed
revised rules on incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities having at least $1 billion in total assets
(including the Company and the Bank). The proposed rules would establish general qualitative requirements applicable to all
covered entities, which would include (i) prohibiting incentive arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing
excessive compensation, (ii) prohibiting incentive arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks that could lead to a material
financial loss, (iii) establishing requirements for performance measures to appropriately balance risk and reward, (iv) requiring
board of director oversight of incentive arrangements, and (v) mandating appropriate record-keeping. Under the proposed rule,
larger financial institutions with total consolidated assets of at least $50 billion would also be subject to additional requirements
applicable to such institutions' "senior executive officers" and "significant risk-takers." These additional requirements would not
be applicable to the Company or the Bank, each of which currently have less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets. If the
rules are adopted in the form proposed, they may restrict our flexibility with respect to the manner in which we structure
compensation and adversely affect our ability to compete for talent.
Cybersecurity
In March of 2015, federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates that financial
institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and ensure that their risk management
processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate
customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution's
management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption,
and maintenance of the institution's operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also
expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network
capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If the Company
fails to observe the regulatory guidance, it could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company relies on electronic communications and information systems to conduct its
operations and store sensitive data. The Company employs an in-depth approach that leverages people, processes, and technology
to manage and maintain cybersecurity controls. In addition, the Company employs a variety of preventative and detective tools
to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on any suspected advanced persistent threats.
Notwithstanding the strength of the Company's defensive measures, the threat from cyber-attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated
and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. While to date the Company has not
detected a significant compromise, significant data loss, or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, its systems
and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that the Company could
detect a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the
foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of
internet and mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by the Company and its customers. See Item 1A,
"Risk Factors" of this Form 10-K for further discussion related to cybersecurity risks.
Future Legislation and Regulation
In addition to the specific legislation described above, various laws and regulations are being considered by Congress and regulatory
agencies that may change banking statutes and the Company's operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways and
may increase reporting requirements and compliance costs. These changes could increase or decrease the cost of doing business,
limit or expand permissible activities, or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and
other financial institutions in ways that could adversely affect the Company.
13
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC, and we make this information
available free of charge on the investor relations section of our website at www.firstmidwest.com/investorrelations. You may read
and copy materials we file with the SEC from its Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC
maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The following documents are also posted on our website or are available
in print upon the request of any stockholder to our Corporate Secretary:
• Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
• Amended and Restated By-Laws.
• Charters for our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
• Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures.
• Corporate Governance Guidelines.
• Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct (the "Code"), which governs our directors, officers, and employees.
• Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.
Within the time period required by the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market, we will post on our website any amendment to the
Code and any waiver applicable to any executive officer, director, or senior financial officer (as defined in the Code). In addition,
our website includes information concerning purchases and sales of our securities by our executive officers and directors. The
accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
("GAAP") and general practices within the banking industry. We post on our website any disclosure relating to certain non-GAAP
financial measures (as defined in the SEC's Regulation G) that we may make public orally, telephonically, by webcast, by broadcast,
or by similar means from time to time.
Our Corporate Secretary can be contacted by writing to First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., One Pierce Place, Suite 1500, Itasca,
Illinois 60143, attention: Corporate Secretary. The Company's Investor Relations Department can be contacted by telephone at
(630) 875-7533 or by e-mail at investor.relations@firstmidwest.com.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Company is subject to risks inherent in our business. The material risks and uncertainties that management
believes affect the Company are described below. Before making an investment decision with respect to any of the Company's
securities, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties as described below, together with all of the information included
herein. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties the Company faces. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known or currently deemed immaterial also may have a material adverse effect on the Company's
results of operations and financial condition. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company's business, financial
condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected, possibly materially. In that event, the trading price of the Company's
Common Stock or other securities could decline. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and actual
results or outcomes may differ substantially from those discussed or implied in these forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to the Company's Business
Interest Rate and Credit Risks
The Company is subject to interest rate risk.
The Company's earnings and cash flows largely depend on its net interest income. Net interest income equals the difference between
interest income and fees earned on interest-earning assets (such as loans and securities) and interest expense incurred on interest-
bearing liabilities (such as deposits and borrowed funds). Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the
Company's control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies,
particularly the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence the amount of
interest the Company earns on loans and securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings. These changes
could also affect (i) the Company's ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of the Company's financial
assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of the Company's securities portfolio. If the interest rates paid on deposits and
other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, the Company's net interest
income and, therefore, earnings could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received
on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings.
14
Although management believes it implements effective asset and liability management strategies to reduce the potential effects
of changes in interest rates on the Company's results of operations, any substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in market
interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. See
"Net Interest Income" in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," of
this Form 10-K for further discussion related to the Company's management of interest rate risk.
The Company is subject to lending risk and lending concentration risk.
There are inherent risks associated with the Company's lending activities. Underwriting and documentation controls cannot mitigate
all credit risks, especially those outside the Company's control. These risks include the impact of changes in interest rates, changes
in the economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates and across the U.S., and the ability of borrowers to
repay loans based on their respective circumstances. Increases in interest rates or weakening economic conditions could adversely
impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing those loans.
In particular, economic weakness in real estate and related markets could increase the Company's lending risk as it relates to its
commercial real estate loan portfolio and the value of the underlying collateral.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company's loan portfolio consisted of 81.6% of corporate loans, the majority of which were secured
by commercial real estate, and 18.4% of consumer loans. The deterioration of these loans could cause a significant increase in
non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in
the provision for loan losses, and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition, and results of operations. See "Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality" in Item 7, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," of this Form 10-K for further discussion related to
corporate and consumer loans.
Real estate market volatility and future changes in disposition strategies could result in net proceeds that differ significantly from
fair value appraisals of loan collateral and OREO and could negatively impact the Company's business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Many of the Company's non-performing real estate loans are collateral-dependent, and the repayment of these loans largely depends
on the value of the collateral securing the loans and the successful operation of the property. For collateral-dependent loans, the
Company estimates the value of the loan based on the appraised value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. The Company's
OREO portfolio consists of properties acquired through foreclosure in partial or total satisfaction of certain loans as a result of
borrower defaults.
In determining the value of OREO properties and other loan collateral, an orderly disposition of the property is generally assumed,
except where a different disposition strategy is expected. The disposition strategy (e.g., "as-is", "orderly liquidation", or "forced
liquidation") the Company has in place for a non-performing loan will determine the appraised value it uses. Significant judgment
is required in estimating the fair value of property, and the period of time within which such estimates can be considered current
is significantly shortened during periods of market volatility.
In response to market conditions and other economic factors, the Company may utilize sale strategies other than orderly dispositions
as part of its disposition strategy, such as immediate liquidation sales. In this event, the net proceeds realized could differ significantly
from estimates used to determine the fair value of the properties as a result of the significant judgments required in estimating fair
value and the variables involved in different methods of disposition. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company's lending activities are subject to strict regulations.
The Company is subject to various laws and regulations that affect its lending activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws
and regulations could subject the Company to regulatory enforcement action that could result in the assessment of significant civil
monetary penalties against the Company and other actions, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company's allowance for credit losses may be insufficient.
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level believed adequate to absorb estimated losses inherent in its
existing loan portfolio. The level of the allowance for credit losses reflects management's continuing evaluation of industry
concentrations, specific credit risks, credit loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic and business conditions,
changes in competitive, legal, and regulatory conditions, and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Determination
of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective since it requires significant estimates and management judgment of credit
risks and future trends, which are subject to material changes. Deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new
information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, changes in accounting principles, and other factors,
15
both within and outside of the Company's control, may require an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, bank
regulatory agencies periodically review the Company's allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in the provision
for loan losses or the recognition of additional loan charge-offs based on judgments different from those of management.
Furthermore, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for credit losses, the Company will need additional provisions
to increase the allowance. Any increases in the allowance for credit losses will result in a decrease in net income and capital and
may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. See Note 1 of "Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion related to the Company's process for
determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses.
Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
The Company may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties in deciding whether to extend
credit or enter into other transactions. This information could include financial statements, credit reports, business plans, and other
information. The Company may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties, or other third-parties, such as
independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial
statements, credit reports, or other information could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition,
and results of operations.
Funding Risks
The Company is a bank holding company and its sources of funds are limited.
The Company is a bank holding company, and its operations are primarily conducted by the Bank, which is subject to significant
federal and state regulation. Cash available to pay dividends to stockholders of the Company is derived primarily from dividends
received from the Bank. The Company's ability to receive dividends or loans from its subsidiaries is restricted by law. Dividend
payments by the Bank to the Company in the future will require generation of future earnings by the Bank and could require
regulatory approval if the proposed dividend is in excess of prescribed guidelines. Further, the Company's right to participate in
the assets of the Bank upon its liquidation, reorganization, or otherwise will be subject to the claims of the Bank's creditors,
including depositors, which will take priority except to the extent the Company may be a creditor with a recognized claim. As of
December 31, 2017, the Company's subsidiaries had deposits and other liabilities of $12.1 billion.
The Company could experience an unexpected inability to obtain needed liquidity.
Liquidity measures the ability to meet current and future cash flow needs as they become due. The liquidity of a financial institution
reflects its ability to meet loan requests, to accommodate possible outflows in deposits, and to take advantage of interest rate
market opportunities. The ability of a financial institution to meet its current financial obligations is a function of its balance sheet
structure, its ability to liquidate assets, and its access to alternative sources of funds. The Company seeks to ensure its funding
needs are met by maintaining an adequate level of liquidity through asset and liability management. If the Company becomes
unable to obtain funds when needed, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Loss of customer deposits could increase the Company's funding costs.
The Company relies on bank deposits to be a low cost and stable source of funding. The Company competes with banks and other
financial services companies for deposits. If the Company's competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, the Company's funding
costs may increase, either because the Company raises its rates to avoid losing deposits or because the Company loses deposits
and must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Higher funding costs could reduce the Company's net interest margin and
net interest income and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Any reduction in the Company's credit ratings could increase its financing costs.
Various rating agencies publish credit ratings for the Company's debt obligations, based on their evaluations of a number of factors,
some of which relate to Company performance and some of which relate to general industry conditions. Management routinely
communicates with each rating agency and anticipates the rating agencies will closely monitor the Company's performance and
update their ratings from time to time during the year.
The Company cannot give any assurance that its current credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a
rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances in the future so warrant.
Downgrades in the Company's credit ratings may adversely affect its borrowing costs and its ability to borrow or raise capital,
and may adversely affect the Company's reputation.
16
The Company's current credit ratings are as follows:
Rating Agency
Standard & Poor's Rating Group, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moody's Investor Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rating
BBB-
Baa2
Regulatory requirements, future growth, or operating results may require the Company to raise additional capital, but that capital
may not be available or be available on favorable terms, or it may be dilutive.
The Company is required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support its operations.
The Company may be required to raise capital if regulatory requirements change, the Company's future operating results erode
capital, or the Company elects to expand through loan growth or acquisition.
The Company's ability to raise capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets, which are outside of its control, and on
the Company's financial performance. Accordingly, the Company cannot be assured of its ability to raise capital when needed or
on favorable terms. If the Company cannot raise additional capital when needed, it will be subject to increased regulatory supervision
and the imposition of restrictions on its growth and business. These could negatively impact the Company's ability to operate or
further expand its operations through acquisitions or the establishment of additional branches and may result in increases in
operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Operational Risks
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines.
The Company's financial performance is impacted by accounting principles, policies, and guidelines. Some of these policies require
the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of the Company's assets or liabilities and financial results. Some
of the Company's accounting policies are critical because they require management to make subjective and complex judgments
about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under
different conditions or using different assumptions. If such estimates or assumptions are incorrect, the Company may experience
material losses. See "Critical Accounting Estimates" in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations," of this Form 10-K for further discussion.
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting
standards, or the interpretation of those standards, that govern the preparation of the Company's external financial statements.
These changes are beyond the Company's control, can be difficult to predict, and could materially impact how the Company reports
its results of operations and financial condition.
These standards are continuously updated and refined and new standards are developed resulting in changes that could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company's controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented.
Management regularly reviews and updates the Company's loan underwriting and monitoring process, internal controls, disclosure
controls and procedures, compliance controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of
controls, however well designed and operated, is based on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the Company's controls and procedures or
failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company's accounting estimates and risk management processes rely on analytical and forecasting models.
The processes the Company uses to estimate its loan losses and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the
processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on the Company's financial condition
and results of operations, depend on the use of analytical and forecasting models. These models reflect assumptions that may not
be accurate, particularly in times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances. Even if these assumptions are adequate, the
models may prove to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation. If the models the
Company uses for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, the Company may incur increased or unexpected
losses resulting from changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models the Company uses for estimating
its loan losses are inadequate, the allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to support future charge-offs. If the models the
Company uses to measure the fair value of financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of these financial instruments may
fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what the Company could realize on the sale or settlement. Any failure in the
17
Company's analytical or forecasting models could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition,
and results of operations.
The Company may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.
The Company's success depends on its ability to attract and retain skilled people. Competition for the best people in most activities
in which the Company engages can be intense, and the Company may not be able to hire people or retain them.
The unexpected loss of services of certain of the Company's skilled personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business because of their skills, knowledge of the Company's market, years of industry experience, customer relationships, and
the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. In addition, the scope and content of the federal banking
agencies' policies on incentive compensation, as well as changes to those policies, could adversely affect the ability of the Company
to hire, retain and motivate its key personnel.
Loss of key employees may disrupt relationships with certain customers.
The Company's customer relationships are critical to the success of its business, and loss of key employees with significant customer
relationships may lead to the loss of business if the customers follow that employee to a competitor. While the Company believes
its relationships with its key personnel are strong, it cannot guarantee that all of its key personnel will remain with the organization,
which could result in the loss of some of its customers and could have an adverse impact on the Company's business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
The Company's information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security, including due to cyber-attacks.
The Company relies heavily on internal and outsourced digital technologies, communications, and information systems to conduct
its business operations and store sensitive data. As the Company's reliance on technology systems increases, the potential risks of
technology-related operation interruptions in the Company's customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan, or
other systems or the occurrence of cyber incidents also increases. Cyber incidents can result from unintentional events or from
deliberate attacks including, among other things, (i) gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating
assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing potentially debilitating operational disruptions, (ii) causing denial-of-
service attacks on websites, or (iii) intelligence gathering and social engineering aimed at obtaining information. Cyber-attacks
can originate from a variety of sources and the techniques used are increasingly sophisticated. The occurrence of operational
interruption, cyber incident, or a deficiency in the cyber security of the Company's technology systems (internal or outsourced)
could negatively impact the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
The Company employs an in-depth approach that leverages people, processes, and technology to manage and maintain cybersecurity
controls. In addition, the Company employs a variety of preventative and detective tools to monitor, block, and provide alerts
regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on any suspected advanced persistent threats. These include policies and procedures
expressly designed to prevent or limit the effect of a failure, interruption, or security breach of its systems, and the maintenance
of cybersecurity insurance. Notwithstanding the strength of the Company's defensive measures, the threat from cyber-attacks is
severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures.
Significant interruptions to the Company's business from technology issues could result in expensive remediation efforts and
distraction of management. The Company is regularly the target of attempted cyber-attacks, and must continuously monitor and
develop our systems and controls to prevent and mitigate these and other incidents. While to date the Company has not detected
a significant compromise, significant data loss, or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks or technology-
related operational interruptions, its systems and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat
and it is possible that the Company could experience a significant event in the future. There can be no assurance that such failures,
interruptions, or security breaches will not occur in the future or, if they do occur, that the impact will not be substantial.
The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of the Company's technology systems could damage the
Company's reputation, result in a loss of customer business, result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss,
or destruction of proprietary information, subject the Company to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil
litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition, and results of operations, as well as its reputation or stock price. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks
are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as
well as due to the expanding use of internet and mobile banking and other technology-based products and services, by the Company
and its customers. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the Company expects it will be required to spend additional resources on
an ongoing basis to continue to modify and enhance its protective measures and to investigate and remediate any information
security vulnerabilities.
18
The Company depends on outside third-parties for processing and handling of Company records and data.
The Company relies on software developed by third-party vendors to process various Company transactions. In some cases, the
Company has contracted with third-parties to run their proprietary software on its behalf. These systems include, but are not limited
to, general ledger, payroll, employee benefits, wealth management record keeping, loan and deposit processing, merchant
processing, and securities portfolio management. While the Company performs a review of controls instituted by the vendors over
these programs in accordance with industry standards and performs its own testing of user controls, the Company must rely on
the continued maintenance of these controls by the outside party, including safeguards over the security of customer data. In
addition, the Company maintains backups of key processing output daily in the event of a failure on the part of any of these systems.
Nonetheless, the Company may incur a temporary disruption in its ability to conduct its business or process its transactions or
incur damage to its reputation if the third-party vendor, or the third-party vendor's vendor, fails to adequately maintain internal
controls or institute necessary changes to systems. Such disruption or breach of security may have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company continually encounters technological change.
The banking and financial services industry continually undergoes technological changes, with frequent introductions of new
technology-driven products and services. In addition to better meeting customer needs, the effective use of technology increases
efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. The Company's future success will depend, in part, on its ability to
address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that enhance customer convenience and
that create additional efficiencies in the Company's operations. Many of the Company's competitors have greater resources to
invest in technological improvements, and the Company may not effectively implement new technology-driven products and
services, or do so as quickly as its competitors, which could reduce its ability to effectively compete. In addition, the necessary
process of updating technology can itself lead to disruptions in availability or functioning of systems. Failure to successfully keep
pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
New lines of business or new products and services, may subject the Company to additional risks.
From time to time, the Company may implement new lines of business or offer new products or services, within existing lines of
business. There can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets
are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products or services, the Company may
invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and new
products or services may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as
compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful
implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and new product or
service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the Company's system of internal controls. Failure to successfully
manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company's estimate of fair values for its investments may not be realizable if it were to sell these securities today.
The Company's securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Accounting standards require the Company to disclose these
securities according to a fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2017, approximately 2% and 98%of the Company's securities
available-for-sale were categorized in level 1 and level 2, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy, and there were no securities
categorized as level 3. See Note 21 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a detailed
description of the fair value hierarchies.
The determination of fair value for securities categorized in level 3 involves significant judgment due to the complexity of factors
contributing to the valuation, many of which are not readily observable in the market. The market disruptions in recent years made
the valuation process even more difficult and subjective.
Consequently, the ultimate sales price for any of these securities could vary significantly from the recorded fair value as of
December 31, 2017, especially if the security is sold during a period of illiquidity or market disruption or as part of a large block
of securities under a forced transaction. Any resulting write-downs of the fair value of the Company's securities available-for-sale
would reduce earnings in the period in which it is recorded and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
The value of the Company's goodwill and other intangible assets may decline in the future.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $754.8 million of goodwill and other intangible assets. If management's estimate of
the fair value of the Company's goodwill no longer exceeds its carrying amount due to changes in applicable qualitative or
19
quantitative factors, the Company could be required to write-off all or a portion of its goodwill. Estimates of fair value can be
impacted by forces outside of the control of management, such as a perceived weakness in financial institutions in general, and
may not be a direct result of the Company's performance. In addition, a significant decline in the Company's expected future cash
flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate, or slower growth rates may necessitate taking future charges related
to the impairment of the Company's goodwill and other intangible assets. A write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets
would reduce earnings in the period in which it is recorded and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
External Risks
The Company operates in a highly competitive industry and market area.
The Company faces substantial competition in all areas of its operations from a variety of different competitors, including traditional
competitors that may be larger and have more financial resources and non-traditional competitors that may be subject to fewer
regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Traditional competitors primarily include national, regional, and
community banks within the markets in which the Company operates. The Company also faces competition from many other
types of financial institutions, including savings and loan associations, credit unions, personal loan and finance companies, retail
and discount stockbrokers, investment advisors, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other financial intermediaries. In addition,
technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services, traditionally provided
by banks, such as loans, automatic fund transfer and automatic payment systems. In particular, the activity and prominence of so-
called marketplace lenders and other technology-driven financial services companies have grown significantly over recent years
and are expected to continue growing.
The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory, and technological changes,
further illiquidity in the credit markets, and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can merge
under the umbrella of a FHC, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting,
insurance, and merchant banking. Due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result,
may offer a broader range of products and services, as well as better pricing for those products and services, than the Company
can offer.
The Company's ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including:
• Developing, maintaining, and building long-term customer relationships.
• Expanding the Company's market position.
• Offering products and services at prices and with the features that meet customers' needs and demands.
•
• Maintaining a satisfactory level of customer service.
• Anticipating and adjusting to changes in industry and general economic trends.
• Continued development and support of internet-based services.
Introducing new products and services.
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken the Company's competitive position, which could adversely
affect the Company's growth and profitability. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company's business may be adversely affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally.
The Company's financial performance depends to a large extent on the business environment in the suburban metropolitan Chicago
market, the states of Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa, and the U.S. as a whole. In particular, the business environment impacts the ability
of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans as well as the value of collateral securing those loans. A
favorable business environment is generally characterized by economic growth, low unemployment, efficient capital markets, low
inflation, high business and investor confidence, strong business earnings, and other factors. Unfavorable or uncertain economic
and market conditions can be caused by declines in economic growth, business activity, or investor or business confidence,
limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital, increases in inflation or interest rates, high unemployment,
natural disasters, or a combination of these or other factors.
During and after the so-called "Great Recession," the suburban metropolitan Chicago market, the states of Illinois, Indiana, and
Iowa, and the U.S. as a whole experienced a downward economic cycle, including a significant recession. While business growth
across a wide range of industries and regions in the U.S. has gradually recovered, local governments and many businesses continue
to experience financial difficulty. Since the recession, economic growth has been slow and uneven and there are continuing concerns
related to the level of U.S. government debt and fiscal actions that may be taken to address that debt. In addition, there are significant
concerns regarding the fiscal affairs and status of the State of Illinois. There can be no assurance that economic conditions will
continue to improve, and these conditions could worsen. Periods of increased volatility in financial and other markets, such as
20
those experienced recently with regard to oil and other commodity prices and current rates, concerns over European sovereign
debt risk, China, and those that may arise from global and political tensions can have a direct or indirect negative impact on the
Company and our customers and introduce greater uncertainty into credit evaluation decisions and prospects for growth. Economic
pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding continuing economic improvement may also result in changes in consumer and
business spending, borrowing and saving habits.
Such conditions could have a material adverse effect on the credit quality of the Company's loans or its business, financial condition,
or results of operations, as well as other potential adverse impacts, including:
• There could be an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased
market volatility, and widespread reduction of business activity generally.
• There could be an increase in write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, such as the Company.
• The Company's ability to assess the creditworthiness of customers could be impaired if the models and approaches it
uses to select, manage, and underwrite credits become less predictive of future performance.
• The process the Company uses to estimate losses inherent in the Company's loan portfolio requires difficult, subjective,
and complex judgments. This process includes analysis of economic conditions and the impact of these economic
conditions on borrowers' ability to repay their loans. The process could no longer be capable of accurate estimation and
may, in turn, impact its reliability.
• The Bank could be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums in the future if losses further deplete the DIF.
• The Company could face increased competition due to intensified consolidation of the financial services industry and
from non-traditional financial services providers.
Even in the case of improved market and economic conditions, there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience
an adverse effect, which may be material, on its ability to access capital and on the Company's business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Turmoil in the financial markets could result in lower fair values for the Company's investment securities.
Major disruptions in the capital markets experienced over the past decade have adversely affected investor demand for all classes
of securities, excluding U.S. Treasury securities, and resulted in volatility in the fair values of the Company's investment securities.
Significant prolonged reduced investor demand could manifest itself in lower fair values for these securities and may result in the
recognition of other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI"), which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
Municipal securities can also be impacted by the business environment of their geographic location. Although this type of security
historically experienced extremely low default rates, municipal securities are subject to systemic risk since cash flows generally
depend on (i) the ability of the issuing authority to levy and collect taxes or (ii) the ability of the issuer to charge for and collect
payment for essential services rendered. If the issuer defaults on its payments, it may result in the recognition of OTTI or total
loss, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Managing reputational risk is important to attracting and maintaining customers, investors, and employees.
Threats to the Company's reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial institutions
generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service or quality, compliance
deficiencies, and questionable or fraudulent activities of the Company's customers. The Company has policies and procedures in
place that seek to protect its reputation and promote ethical conduct. Nonetheless, negative publicity may arise regarding the
Company's business, employees, or customers, with or without merit, and could result in the loss of customers, investors, and
employees, costly litigation, a decline in revenues, and increased governmental oversight. Negative publicity could have a material
adverse impact on the Company's reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.
The Company may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. The Company
has exposure to many different industries and counterparties and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial
services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of
these transactions expose the Company to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, the Company's
credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Company cannot be realized upon liquidation or is liquidated at
prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to the Company. Any such losses could
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.
21
The Company is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.
A significant portion of the Company's loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the
Company may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic
substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Company may be liable for remediation
costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require the Company to incur substantial
expenses and could materially reduce the affected property's value or limit the Company's ability to sell the affected property or
to repay the indebtedness secured by the property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies
with respect to existing laws may increase the Company's exposure to environmental liability. Although the Company has policies
and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may
not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated
with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of
operations, and liquidity.
Severe weather, natural disasters, health emergencies, acts of war or terrorism, and other external events could significantly
impact the Company's business.
Severe weather, natural disasters, pandemics and other health emergencies, acts of war or terrorism, and other adverse external
events could have a significant impact on the Company's ability to conduct business. These events could affect the stability of the
Company's deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, reduce the value of collateral securing loans,
cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. Although
management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
U.S. credit downgrades or changes in outlook by the major credit rating agencies may have an adverse effect on financial markets,
including financial institutions and the financial industry.
Due to concerns over the U.S. debt limit and budget deficit, the major ratings agencies have downgraded or lowered their outlooks
for the U.S.'s credit rating. Further downgrades of the U.S. federal government's sovereign credit rating, and the perceived
creditworthiness of U.S. government-backed obligations, could impact the Company's ability to obtain funding that is collateralized
by affected instruments and to access capital markets on favorable terms. Such downgrades could also affect the pricing of funding,
when funding is available. A downgrade of the credit rating of the U.S. government, or of its agencies, government-sponsored
enterprises or related institutions, agencies or instrumentalities, may also adversely affect the market value of such instruments
and, further, exacerbate the other risks to which the Company is subject. These events could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The full impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("federal income tax reform") on us and our customers is unknown at present, creating
uncertainty and risk related to our customers' future demand for credit and our future results.
Increased economic activity expected to result from the decrease in federal income tax rates on businesses generally could spur
additional economic activity that would encourage additional borrowing. At the same time, some customers may elect to use their
additional cash flow from lower taxes to fund their existing levels of activity, decreasing borrowing needs. The elimination of the
federal income tax deductibility of business interest expense for a significant number of our customers effectively increases the
cost of borrowing and makes equity or hybrid funding relatively more attractive. This could have a long-term negative impact on
business customer borrowing. We are anticipating a significant increase in our after-tax net income available to stockholders in
2018 and future years as a result of the decrease in our effective tax rate. Some or all of this benefit could be lost to the extent that
the banks and financial services companies we compete with elect to lower interest rates and fees and we are forced to respond
in order to remain competitive. There is no assurance that presently anticipated benefits of federal income tax reform for the
Company will be realized.
Legal/Compliance Risks
The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive government regulation and supervision.
The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive federal and state regulations and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily
intended to protect depositors' funds, FDIC funds, and the banking system as a whole, not security holders. These regulations
affect the Company's lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy, and growth. Congress and federal
regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations, policies, and other supervisory guidance for possible changes.
Changes to statutes, regulations, regulatory policies, or other supervisory guidance, including changes in the interpretation or
implementation of those regulations or policies, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways and could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. These changes could subject
the Company to additional costs, limit the types of financial products and services the Company may offer, limit the activities it
22
is permitted to engage in, and increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial products and services. Failure to
comply with laws, regulations, policies, or other regulatory guidance could result in civil or criminal sanctions by regulatory
agencies, civil monetary penalties, and damage to the Company's reputation. Government authorities, including the bank regulatory
agencies, are pursuing aggressive enforcement actions with respect to compliance and other legal matters involving financial
activities. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results
of operations. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance
that such violations will not occur. See "Supervision and Regulation" in Item 1, "Business," and Note 18 of "Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
The Company's business may be adversely affected in the future by the implementation of ongoing regulations regarding banks
and financial institutions under the Dodd-Frank Act and other legal and regulatory changes.
The Dodd-Frank Act significantly changed the bank regulatory structure and affects the lending, deposit, investment, trading, and
operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act required various federal agencies
to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. Compliance with
these new laws and regulations has resulted, and will continue to result, in additional operating costs that have had an effect on
the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. While the current administration in the U.S. may ultimately
roll back or modify certain of the regulations adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, uncertainty about the timing and scope of
any such changes as well as the cost of complying with a new regulatory regime, may negatively impact our businesses, at least
in the short-term, even if the long-term impact of any such changes are positive for our businesses. See "Supervision and Regulation"
in Item 1, "Business" of this Form 10-K for a discussion of several significant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, including the
Volcker Rule.
Compliance with any new requirements may cause the Company to hire additional compliance or other personnel, design and
implement additional internal controls, or incur other significant expenses, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition, or results of operations. Compliance with the annual stress testing requirements, part
of which must be publicly disclosed, may also be misinterpreted by the market generally or the Company's customers and, as a
result, may adversely affect the Company's stock price or the Company's ability to retain its customers or effectively compete for
new business opportunities. To ensure compliance with new requirements when effective, the Company's regulators may require
it to fully comply with these requirements or take actions to prepare for compliance even before it might otherwise be required,
which may cause the Company to incur compliance-related costs before it might otherwise be required. The Company's regulators
may also consider its preparation for compliance with these regulatory requirements when examining its operations generally or
considering any request for regulatory approval the Company may make, even requests for approvals on unrelated matters.
The level of the commercial real estate loan portfolio may subject the Company to additional regulatory scrutiny.
The FDIC, the Federal Reserve, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued joint guidance on sound risk management
practices for financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Under the guidance, a financial institution
that is actively involved in commercial real estate lending should perform a risk assessment to identify concentrations. A financial
institution may have a concentration in commercial real estate lending if (i) total reported loans for construction, land development,
and other land represent 100% or more of total capital or (ii) total reported loans secured by multi-family and non-farm residential
properties, loans for construction, land development, and other land loans otherwise sensitive to the general commercial real estate
market, including loans to commercial real estate related entities, represent 300% or more of total capital. The joint guidance
requires heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development
of underwriting standards, risk assessment, and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing. The Company is currently
in compliance with these regulations. If regulators determine the Company is in violation of these restrictions or has not adequately
implemented risk management practices, they could impose additional regulatory restrictions against the Company, which could
have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company and its subsidiaries may not be able to realize the benefit of deferred tax assets.
The Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The deferred tax assets can be recognized in future periods depending
on a number of factors, including the ability to realize the asset through carryback or carryforward to taxable income in prior or
future years, the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income, and the possible application of
future tax planning strategies. A valuation allowance is established for any deferred tax asset for which recovery or settlement is
not more likely than not.
23
Each quarter, the Company assesses its deferred tax asset position, including the recoverability of this asset or the need for a
valuation allowance. This assessment takes into consideration positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more
likely than not that a portion of the asset will not be realized. If the Company is not able to recognize deferred tax assets in future
periods, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company is a defendant in a variety of litigation and other actions.
Currently, there are certain legal proceedings pending against the Company and its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business.
While the outcome of any legal proceeding is inherently uncertain, the Company's management believes that any liabilities arising
from pending legal matters would be immaterial based on information currently available. However, if actual results differ from
management's expectations, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations,
or cash flows. For a detailed discussion on current legal proceedings, see Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," and Note 20 of "Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Risks Related to Acquisition Activity
Future acquisitions may disrupt the Company's business and dilute stockholder value.
The Company strategically looks to acquire whole banks, branches of other banks, and non-banking organizations. The Company
has recently been active in the merger and acquisition market and may consider future acquisitions to supplement internal growth
opportunities, as permitted by regulators. Acquiring other banks, branches, or non-banks involves potential risks that could have
a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations, including:
• Exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of acquired institutions.
• Disruption of the Company's business.
• Loss of key employees and customers of acquired institutions.
•
Short-term decreases in profitability.
• Diversion of management's time and attention.
Issues arising during transition and integration.
•
• Dilution in the ownership percentage of holders of the Company's Common Stock.
• Difficulty in estimating the value of the target company.
•
Payment of a premium over book and market values that may dilute the Company's tangible book value and earnings per
share in the short and long-term.
• Volatility in reported income as goodwill impairment losses could occur irregularly and in varying amounts.
•
Inability to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other
projected benefits.
• Changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that could impair or eliminate the expected benefits of merger and acquisition
activities.
From time to time, the Company may evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities and conduct due diligence activities related
to possible transactions with other financial institutions and financial services companies. As a result, merger or acquisition
discussions and negotiations may take place and future mergers or acquisitions involving cash, debt, or equity securities may occur
at any time. Acquisitions may involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and, therefore, some dilution of
the Company's tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future transaction.
Furthermore, failure to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, or other
projected benefits from an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, from time to time, banking regulators may restrict the Company from making acquisitions. See "Growth
and Acquisitions" and "Supervision and Regulation" in Item 1, "Business," of this Form 10-K for additional detail and further
discussion of these matters.
Competition for acquisition candidates is intense.
Numerous potential acquirers compete with the Company for acquisition candidates. The Company may not be able to successfully
identify and acquire suitable targets, which could slow the Company's growth and have a material adverse effect on its ability to
compete in its markets.
Failure to comply with the terms of loss share agreements with the FDIC may result in potential losses.
The Company has completed four FDIC-assisted transactions. In three of those transactions, residential mortgage loans and OREO
continue to be covered by FDIC Agreements, under which the FDIC will reimburse the Bank for a portion of the losses and eligible
24
expenses arising from certain assets of the acquired institutions. The FDIC Agreements have specific and detailed compliance,
servicing, notification, and reporting requirements. Non-compliance with the terms of the FDIC Agreements could result in the
loss of reimbursement on individual loans, large pools of loans, or OREO and could result in material losses that adversely affect
the Company's business or financial condition.
The valuations of acquired loans and OREO, including those acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions and the related FDIC
indemnification asset, rely on estimates that may be inaccurate.
The Company performs a valuation of acquired loans and OREO. Although management makes various assumptions and judgments
about the collectability of the acquired loans, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other
assets serving as collateral for the repayment of secured loans associated with these transactions, its estimates of the fair value of
assets acquired could be inaccurate. Valuing these assets using inaccurate assumptions could materially and adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
For loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that include FDIC Agreements, the Company records an FDIC indemnification
asset that reflects its estimate of the timing and amount of reimbursements for future losses that are anticipated to occur. In
determining the size of the FDIC indemnification asset, the Company analyzes the loan portfolio based on historical loss experience,
volume and classification of loans, volume and trends in delinquencies and non-accruals, local economic conditions, and other
pertinent information. Changes in the Company's estimate of the timing of those losses, specifically if those losses are to occur
beyond the applicable loss-share periods, may result in charges related to the impairment of the FDIC indemnification asset, which
would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. If the assumptions related
to the timing or amount of expected losses are incorrect, there could be a negative impact on the Company's operating results.
Increases in the amount of future losses in response to different economic conditions or adverse developments in the acquired
loan portfolio may result in increased charge-offs, which would also negatively impact the Company's business, financial condition,
and results of operations.
Acquisitions May be Delayed, Impeded, Or Prohibited Due To Regulatory Issues.
Acquisitions by financial institutions, including the Company, are subject to approval by a variety of federal and state regulatory
agencies (collectively, "regulatory approvals"). The process for obtaining these required regulatory approvals has become
substantially more difficult in recent years. Regulatory approvals could be delayed, impeded, restrictively conditioned or denied
due to new regulatory issues the Company may have with regulatory agencies, including, without limitation, issues related to Bank
Secrecy Act compliance, CRA issues, fair lending laws, fair housing laws, consumer protection laws, unfair, deceptive, or abusive
acts or practices regulations and other similar laws and regulations. The Company may fail to pursue, evaluate, or complete strategic
and competitively significant acquisition opportunities as a result of its inability, or perceived or anticipated inability, to obtain
regulatory approvals in a timely manner, under reasonable conditions, or at all. Difficulties associated with potential acquisitions
that may result from these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Associated with the Company's Common Stock
An investment in the Company's Common Stock is not an insured deposit.
The Company's Common Stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit
insurance fund, or by any other public or private entity. Investment in the Company's Common Stock is inherently risky for the
reasons described in this "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K and is subject to the same market forces that
affect the price of common stock in any public company. As a result, if you acquire the Company's Common Stock, you could
lose some or all of your investment.
The Company's stock price can be volatile.
Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your Common Stock when you want and at prices you find
attractive. The Company's Common Stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including:
• Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations.
• Recommendations by securities analysts.
• Operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company.
• News reports relating to trends, concerns, and other issues in the financial services industry.
Perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Company and/or its competitors.
•
• New technology used or services offered by competitors.
•
Significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments by or
involving the Company or its competitors.
25
•
Failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions.
• Changes in government regulations.
• Geopolitical conditions, such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.
General market fluctuations, industry factors, and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic
slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, or credit loss trends, could also cause the Company's Common Stock price to
decrease regardless of operating results.
The trading volume in the Company's Common Stock may be less than that of other, larger financial services institutions.
Although the Company's Common Stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market, its trading volume may be less than
that of other, larger financial services institutions. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity,
and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the Company's Common Stock at any
given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over
which the Company has no control. During any period of lower trading volume of the Company's Common Stock, significant
sales of shares of the Company's Common Stock, or the expectation of these sales could cause the Company's Common Stock
price to fall.
The Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws, as well as certain banking laws, may
have an anti-takeover effect.
Provisions of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws and federal banking laws,
including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire the Company, even if doing
so would be perceived to be beneficial by the Company's stockholders. The combination of these provisions effectively inhibits
a non-negotiated merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of the Company's
Common Stock.
The Company may issue additional securities, which could dilute the ownership percentage of holders of the Company's Common
Stock.
The Company may issue additional securities to raise additional capital, finance acquisitions, or for other corporate purposes, or
in connection with its share-based compensation plans or retirement plans, and, if it does, the ownership percentage of holders of
the Company's Common Stock could be diluted, potentially materially.
The Company has not established a minimum dividend payment level, and it cannot ensure its ability to pay dividends in the future.
The Company's fourth quarter 2017 cash dividend was $0.10 per share. The Company has not established a minimum dividend
payment level, and the amount of its dividend may fluctuate. All dividends will be made at the discretion of the Company's Board
of Directors (the "Board") and will depend on the Company's earnings, financial condition, and such other factors as the Board
may deem relevant from time to time. The Board may, at its discretion, further reduce or eliminate dividends or change its dividend
policy in the future.
In addition, the Federal Reserve issued Federal Reserve Supervision and Regulation Letter SR-09-4, which requires bank holding
companies to inform and consult with Federal Reserve supervisory staff prior to declaring and paying a dividend that exceeds
earnings for the period for which the dividend is being paid. Under this regulation, if the Company experiences losses in a series
of consecutive quarters, it may be required to inform and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff prior to declaring or
paying any dividends. In this event, there can be no assurance that the Company's regulators will approve the payment of such
dividends.
Offerings of debt, which would be senior to the Company's Common Stock upon liquidation, and/or preferred equity securities,
which may be senior to the Company's Common Stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely
affect the market price of the Company's Common Stock.
The Company may attempt to increase capital or raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity
securities, including trust-preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes, and preferred stock. In the event of liquidation, holders
of the Company's debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions
of the Company's available assets prior to the holders of the Company's Common Stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute
the holdings of the Company's existing stockholders or reduce the market price of the Company's Common Stock, or both. Holders
of the Company's Common Stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution.
The Board is authorized to issue one or more series of preferred stock from time to time without any action on the part of the
Company's stockholders. The Board also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series
26
of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over the Company's Common Stock
with respect to dividends or upon the Company's dissolution, winding-up, liquidation, and other terms. If the Company issues
preferred stock in the future that has a preference over the Company's Common Stock with respect to the payment of dividends
or upon liquidation, or if the Company issues preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the Company's
Common Stock, the rights of holders of the Company's Common Stock or the market price of the Company's Common Stock
could be adversely affected.
None.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The corporate headquarters of the Company are located at One Pierce Place, Itasca, Illinois, and are leased from an unaffiliated
third-party. The Company entered into a new corporate headquarters lease in connection with the planned Spring of 2018 relocation
to Chicago. The Company conducts business through 135 banking locations largely located in various communities throughout
the greater Chicago metropolitan area, as well as northwest Indiana, central and western Illinois, and eastern Iowa. Approximately
70%, of the Company's banking locations are leased and 30% are owned.
The Company owns 184 ATMs, most of which are housed at banking locations. Some ATMs are independently located. In addition,
the Company owns other real property that, when considered individually or in the aggregate, is not material to the Company's
financial position.
The Company believes its facilities in the aggregate are suitable and adequate to operate its banking business. Additional information
regarding premises and equipment is presented in Note 8 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, there were certain legal proceedings pending against the Company and its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2017. While the outcome of any legal proceeding is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available,
the Company's management does not expect that any liabilities arising from pending legal matters will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
27
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company's Common Stock is traded under the symbol "FMBI" in the NASDAQ Global Select Market tier of the NASDAQ
Stock Market. As of December 31, 2017, there were 2,134 stockholders of record, a number that does not include beneficial owners
who hold shares in "street name" (or stockholders from previously acquired companies that had not yet exchanged their stock).
2017
2016
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Market price of Common Stock
High. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
25.86
$
24.00
$
24.72
$
Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22.03
20.50
21.61
25.83
22.19
$
25.56
$
19.90
$
18.85
$
18.75
16.68
15.86
18.59
14.56
Cash dividends declared per
common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
Payment of future dividends is within the discretion of the Board and will depend on the Company's earnings, capital requirements,
financial condition, dividends from the Bank to the Company, and such other factors as the Board may deem relevant from time
to time. The Board makes the dividend determination on a quarterly basis. Further discussion of the Company's approach to the
payment of dividends is included in the "Management of Capital" section of "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
A discussion regarding the regulatory restrictions applicable to the Bank's ability to pay dividends to the Company is included in
the "Business – Supervision and Regulation – Dividends" and "Risk Factors – Risks Associated with the Company's Common
Stock" sections in Items 1 and 1A, respectively, of this Form 10-K.
For a description of the securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see Item 12, "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters," of this Form 10-K.
28
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below illustrates the cumulative total return (defined as stock price appreciation assuming the reinvestment of all
dividends) to stockholders of the Company's Common Stock compared to a broad-market total return equity index, the NASDAQ
Composite, and a published industry total return equity index, the NASDAQ Banks, over a five-year period.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return Among
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite, and the NASDAQ Banks (1)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . .
NASDAQ Composite . . . . . . . .
NASDAQ Banks . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
100.00
100.00
100.00
$
141.48
141.63
140.76
$
140.64
162.09
146.90
$
154.54
173.33
157.63
$
215.47
187.19
216.24
208.47
242.29
227.94
(1) Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2012 with the reinvestment of all related dividends.
To the extent this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into any other filing by the Company under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, the foregoing "Stock Performance Graph" will not be deemed incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise
in such filing and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.
29
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the Company's monthly Common Stock purchases during the fourth quarter of 2017. The Board
approved a stock repurchase program on November 27, 2007. Up to 2,500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock may be
repurchased, and the total remaining authorization under the program was 2,487,947 shares as of December 31, 2017. The
repurchase program has no set expiration or termination date.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased (1)
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
— $
803
2,398
3,201
$
—
22.71
24.37
23.95
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of a
Publicly
Announced
Plan or
Program
—
—
—
—
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plan or
Program
2,487,947
2,487,947
2,487,947
October 1 – October 31, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November 1 – November 30, 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 1 – December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) Consists of shares acquired pursuant to the Company's share-based compensation plans and not the Company's Board-approved stock repurchase
program. Under the terms of the Company's share-based compensation plans, the Company accepts previously owned shares of Common Stock
surrendered to satisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted shares or by option holders upon exercise to cover the exercise
price of the stock options.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
30
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Consolidated financial information reflecting a summary of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company for
each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2017 is presented in the following table. This summary should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and accompanying notes thereto, and other financial information included
in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," of this Form 10-K. A more detailed discussion and analysis of the
factors affecting the Company's financial condition and results of operations is presented in Item 7, "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," of this Form 10-K.
2017
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2016
2014
$
$
98,387
97,471
0.96
0.96
1.35
0.39
18.16
24.01
Results of Operations (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares. . . . . . . . . . . .
Per Common Share Data
Basic earnings per common share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common share, adjusted (1) . . . . . .
Common dividends declared. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Book value at year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Market price at year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Performance Ratios
Return on average common equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average common equity, adjusted (1) . . . . . . .
Return on average tangible common equity . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average tangible common equity, adjusted (1).
Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest margin (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-performing loans to total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-performing assets to total loans plus OREO . . . . . .
Balance Sheet Highlights
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.32%
7.45%
9.44%
13.06%
0.70%
0.98%
3.87%
0.68%
0.89%
$ 14,077,052
10,437,812
11,053,325
195,170
$
$
$
$
92,349
91,306
1.14
1.14
1.22
0.36
15.46
25.23
7.38%
7.86%
10.77%
11.45%
0.84%
0.90%
3.60%
0.78%
1.12%
$
$
82,064
81,182
1.05
1.05
1.13
0.36
14.70
18.43
7.17%
7.70%
10.44%
11.19%
0.85%
0.91%
3.68%
0.45%
0.88%
$
$
69,306
68,470
0.92
0.92
1.03
0.31
14.17
17.11
6.56%
7.36%
9.32%
10.42%
0.80%
0.89%
3.69%
1.07%
1.64%
2013
79,306
78,199
1.06
1.06
0.92
0.16
13.34
17.53
8.04%
6.98%
11.29%
10.08%
0.96%
0.83%
3.68%
1.79%
2.91%
$ 11,422,555
8,254,145
8,828,603
194,603
$ 9,732,676
7,161,715
8,097,738
201,208
$ 9,445,139
6,736,853
7,887,758
200,869
$ 8,253,407
5,714,360
6,766,101
190,932
Long-term portion of Federal Home Loan Bank
("FHLB") advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Ratios
Allowance for credit losses to total loans . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net charge-offs to average loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total capital to risk-weighted assets (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CET1 to risk-weighted assets (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital to average assets (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity to tangible assets. . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend payout ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend payout ratio, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N/M – Not meaningful.
—
1,864,874
—
1,257,080
—
1,146,268
—
1,100,775
114,550
1,001,442
0.93%
0.21%
12.15%
10.10%
9.68%
8.99%
8.33%
40.63%
28.89%
1.06%
0.24%
12.23%
9.90%
9.39%
8.99%
8.05%
31.58%
29.51%
1.05%
0.29%
11.15%
10.28%
9.73%
9.40%
8.59%
34.17%
31.86%
1.11%
0.52%
11.23%
10.19%
N/M
9.03%
8.41%
33.70%
30.10%
1.52%
0.55%
12.39%
10.91%
N/M
9.18%
9.09%
15.14%
17.39%
(1) This ratio is a non-GAAP measure. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, see the "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations"
section of "Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in item 7 of this Form 10-K.
(2) Basel III Capital Rules became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015. These rules revise the risk-based capital requirements and introduce a
new capital measure, CET1 to risk-weighted assets. As a result, ratios subsequent to December 31, 2014 are computed using the new rules and prior
periods presented are reported using the regulatory guidance applicable at that time.
31
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in the Chicago suburb of Itasca, Illinois with operations
throughout the Chicago metropolitan area as well as northwest Indiana, central and western Illinois, and eastern Iowa through 135
banking locations. Our principal subsidiary, First Midwest Bank, and other affiliates provide a broad range of commercial, retail,
treasury management, and wealth management products and services to commercial and industrial, commercial real estate,
municipal, and consumer customers. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the people and businesses in the
communities where we live and work by providing customized banking solutions, quality products, and innovative services that
fulfill those financial needs.
The following discussion and analysis is intended to address the significant factors affecting our Consolidated Statements of
Income for the three years ended December 31, 2017 and Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31,
2017 and 2016. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation. When we
use the terms "First Midwest," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our," we mean First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries. When we use the term "Bank," we are referring to our wholly-owned banking subsidiary, First Midwest Bank.
Management's discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, accompanying
notes thereto, and other financial information presented in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Our results of operations are affected by various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including interest rates, local and
national economic conditions, business spending, consumer confidence, legislative and regulatory changes, certain seasonal factors,
and changes in real estate and securities markets. Our management evaluates performance using a variety of qualitative and
quantitative metrics. The primary quantitative metrics used by management include:
• Net Interest Income – Net interest income, our primary source of revenue, equals the difference between interest income
and fees earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities.
• Net Interest Margin – Net interest margin equals tax-equivalent net interest income divided by total average interest-
earning assets.
• Noninterest Income – Noninterest income is the income we earn from fee-based revenues, investment in bank-owned
life insurance ("BOLI") and other income, and non-operating revenues.
• Noninterest Expense – Noninterest expense is the expense we incur to operate the Company, which includes salaries and
employee benefits, net occupancy and equipment, professional services, and other costs.
• Asset Quality – Asset quality represents an estimation of the quality of our loan portfolio, including an assessment of the
credit risk related to existing and potential loss exposure, and can be evaluated using a number of quantitative measures,
such as non-performing loans to total loans.
• Regulatory Capital – Our regulatory capital is classified in one of the following tiers: (i) Common Equity Tier 1 capital
("CET1"), which consists of common equity and retained earnings, less goodwill and other intangible assets and a portion
of disallowed deferred tax assets, (ii) Tier 1 capital, which consists of CET1 and qualifying trust-preferred securities and
the remaining portion of disallowed deferred tax assets, and (iii) Tier 2 capital, which includes qualifying subordinated
debt and the allowance for credit losses, subject to limitations.
Some of these metrics may be presented on a non-GAAP basis. For detail on our non-GAAP measures, see the discussion in the
section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations." Unless otherwise stated, all earnings per
common share data included in this section and throughout the remainder of this discussion are presented on a fully diluted basis.
A quarterly summary of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is included in the section of this Item 7 titled
"Quarterly Earnings."
As of December 31, 2017, the Company and the Bank each had total assets of over $14.0 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act and its
implementing regulations impose various additional requirements on bank holding companies and banks with $10.0 billion or
more in total consolidated assets. As a general matter, these requirements are phased-in and become applicable to the Company
and the Bank over various dates. For a discussion of the impact that the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations have
on the Company and the Bank now that they have each exceeded $10.0 billion in total consolidated assets, see the "Supervision
and Regulation" section in Item 1 "Business" and Item 1A "Risk Factors" of this Form 10-K.
32
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-K may contain certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "may," "might," "will,"
"would," "should," "could," "expect," "plan," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "probable," "potential,"
"possible," "target," "continue," "look forward," or "assume," and words of similar import. Forward-looking statements are not
historical facts but instead express only management's beliefs regarding future results or events, many of which, by their nature,
are inherently uncertain and outside of management's control. It is possible that actual results and events may differ, possibly
materially, from the anticipated results or events indicated in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of future performance or outcomes, and we caution you not to place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-
looking statements are made only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements contained in this report to reflect new information or events or conditions after the date hereof.
Forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to our future financial performance,
the performance of our loan or securities portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves or charge-offs, corporate strategies
or objectives, including the impact of strategic actions and initiatives, anticipated trends in our business, regulatory developments,
the impact of federal income tax reform legislation, acquisition transactions, including estimated synergies, cost savings and
financial benefits of consummated transactions, and growth strategies, including possible future acquisitions. These statements
are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. These risks, uncertainties, and assumptions include, among other things,
the following:
• Management's ability to reduce and effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest rates in general on the
volatility of our net interest income.
• Asset and liability matching risks and liquidity risks.
•
Fluctuations in the value of our investment securities.
• The ability to attract and retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services.
• The sufficiency of the allowance for credit losses to absorb the amount of actual losses inherent in the existing loan
portfolio.
• The models and assumptions underlying the establishment of the allowance for credit losses and estimation of values of
collateral and various financial assets and liabilities may be inadequate.
• Credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within our loan portfolio.
• The effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies,
credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds, and other financial
institutions operating in our markets or elsewhere providing similar services.
• Changes in the economic environment, competition, or other factors that may influence the anticipated growth rate of
loans and deposits, the quality of the loan portfolio, and loan and deposit pricing.
• Changes in general economic or industry conditions, nationally or in the communities in which we conduct business.
• Volatility of rate sensitive deposits.
• Our ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete effectively in the marketplace.
• Operational risks, including data processing system failures, fraud, or breaches.
• Our ability to successfully pursue acquisition and expansion strategies and integrate any acquired companies.
• The impact of liabilities arising from legal or administrative proceedings, enforcement of bank regulations, and enactment
or application of laws or regulations.
• Governmental monetary and fiscal policies and legislative and regulatory changes (including those implementing
provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act) that may result in the imposition of costs and constraints through higher FDIC insurance
premiums, significant fluctuations in market interest rates, increases in capital or liquidity requirements, operational
limitations, or compliance costs.
• Changes in federal and state tax laws or interpretations, including changes affecting tax rates, income not subject to tax
under existing law and interpretations, income sourcing, or consolidation/combination rules.
• Changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines affecting the businesses we conduct.
• Acts of war or terrorism, natural disasters, and other external events.
• Other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, products,
services, and prices.
33
For a further discussion of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" in
Item 1A in this report, this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our
subsequent filings made with the SEC. However, these risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report
describe additional factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance.
SIGNIFICANT RECENT EVENTS
Acquisitions
Standard Bancshares, Inc.
On January 6, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Standard. With the acquisition, the Company acquired 35 banking
offices located primarily in the southwest Chicago suburbs and adjacent markets in northwest Indiana, and added approximately
$2.0 billion in deposits and $1.8 billion in loans. The merger consideration totaled $580.7 million and consisted of $533.6 million
in Company common stock and $47.1 million in cash. All operating systems were converted during the first quarter of 2017.
Premier Asset Management LLC
On February 28, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Premier, a registered investment advisor based in Chicago,
Illinois. At the close of the acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $550.0 million of trust assets under management.
Impact of Tax Reform
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("federal income tax reform") was enacted into law. This federal income tax
reform, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As a result,
the Company revalued its deferred tax assets ("DTAs"), expanded investments in its colleagues and communities, and took certain
actions related to its securities portfolio as follows:
• Revalued its DTAs by $27 million, which was recorded as additional income tax expense in the Company's statement of
operations in the fourth quarter of 2017.
•
•
Increased its minimum pay rate to $15 for hourly colleagues, effective in 2018.
Paid a special bonus of up to $1,035 to nearly 85% of colleagues. The aggregate amount of these bonuses was approximately
$2 million on a pre-tax basis for the fourth quarter of 2017.
• Contributed approximately $2 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 to the First Midwest Charitable Foundation, which
supports charitable organizations in the communities the Company serves.
• Liquidated all of its $46 million in trust-preferred collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs") at a minimal loss of
approximately $800,000 late in the fourth quarter of 2017. This action improved the Company's total capital to risk-
weighted assets by approximately 20 basis points.
•
Sold $150 million of collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs") and other mortgage-backed securities ("MBSs") late
in the fourth quarter of 2017 at a loss of approximately $5 million in order to invest the proceeds in higher-yielding
securities with similar durations.
34
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Table 1
Selected Financial Data
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Results
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income tax expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common share, adjusted (1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Performance Ratios
Return on average common equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average common equity, adjusted (1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average tangible common equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average tangible common equity, adjusted (1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets, adjusted (1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest margin (1)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Efficiency ratio (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
$
$
$
509,716
37,712
472,004
31,290
163,149
415,909
187,954
89,567
98,387
101,443
0.96
1.35
$
$
$
$
378,332
28,641
349,691
30,983
159,312
339,500
138,520
46,171
92,349
79,810
1.14
1.22
$
$
$
$
335,984
24,386
311,598
21,152
136,581
307,216
119,811
37,747
82,064
77,072
1.05
1.13
5.32%
7.45%
9.44%
13.06%
0.70%
0.98%
3.87%
59.73%
7.38%
7.86%
10.77%
11.45%
0.84%
0.90%
3.60%
62.59%
7.17%
7.70%
10.44%
11.19%
0.85%
0.91%
3.68%
63.57%
(1)
This is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial
Information and Reconciliations."
(2) Adjustments to net income include the revaluation of DTAs (2017), certain actions resulting in securities losses and gains (2017), a special bonus to
colleagues (2017), a charitable contribution to the First Midwest Charitable Foundation (2017), acquisition and integration related expenses associated
with completed and pending acquisitions (all periods presented), a lease cancellation fee recognized as a result of the Company's planned 2018 corporate
headquarters relocation (2016), a net gain on sale-leaseback transaction (2016), and property valuation adjustments (2015). For additional discussion
of adjustments, see the "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations" section.
(3)
See the section of this Item 7 titled "Earnings Performance" below for additional discussion and calculation of this metric.
35
Balance Sheet Highlights
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Core deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans to deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Core deposits to total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset Quality Highlights
Non-accrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
90 days or more past due loans, still accruing interest (1) . . . .
Total non-performing loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruing troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") . . . . . . . . . .
OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-performing assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30-89 days past due loans (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-performing assets to loans plus OREO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for credit losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding
acquired loans (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans (2) . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2016
2017
$ Change
% Change
$ 14,077,052
10,437,812
11,053,325
9,406,542
$ 11,422,555
8,254,145
8,828,603
7,635,318
94.4%
85.1%
93.5%
86.5%
$
$
$
66,924
3,555
70,479
1,796
20,851
93,126
39,725
0.89%
59,289
5,009
64,298
2,291
26,083
92,672
21,043
1.12%
$
$
$
$
2,654,497
2,183,667
2,224,722
1,771,224
7,635
(1,454)
6,181
(495)
(5,232)
454
18,682
23.2
26.5
25.2
23.2
12.9
(29.0)
9.6
(21.6)
(20.1)
0.5
88.8
96,729
$
87,083
$
9,646
11.1
0.93%
1.06%
1.07%
144.54%
1.11%
146.88%
(1)
(2)
(3)
Purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans with an accretable yield are considered current and are not included in past due loan totals.
This ratio includes acquired loans that are recorded at fair value through an acquisition adjustment, which incorporates credit risk as of the acquisition
date with no allowance for credit losses being established at that time. As the acquisition adjustment is accreted into income over future periods, an
allowance for credit losses is established as necessary to reflect credit deterioration. A discussion of the allowance for acquired loan losses and the
related acquisition adjustment is presented in the section of this Item 7 titled "Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality."
The allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding acquired loans is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial
measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
Performance Overview for 2017 Compared with 2016
Net income for 2017 was $98.4 million, or $0.96 per share, compared to net income of $92.3 million, or $1.14 per share, for 2016.
Performance for 2017 and 2016 was impacted by certain significant transactions, which include: revaluation of DTAs related to
federal income tax reform and changes in Illinois income tax rates (2017), a special bonus to colleagues (2017), a charitable
contribution to the First Midwest Charitable Foundation (2017), certain actions resulting in securities losses and gains (2017),
acquisition and integration related expenses associated with completed and pending acquisitions (both 2017 and 2016), a lease
cancellation fee recognized as a result of the Company's planned 2018 corporate headquarters relocation (2016), and a net gain
on a sale-leaseback transaction (2016). Excluding these adjustments, earnings per share was $1.35 for 2017 and $1.22 for 2016.
The increase in net income and earnings per share reflects the benefit of the Standard and Premier acquisitions completed in the
first quarter of 2017 and the full year impact of the NI Bancshares acquisition completed during the first quarter of 2016, organic
loan growth, and increases in fee-based revenues, partially offset by higher noninterest expenses.
Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.87% for 2017 compared to 3.60% for 2016, driven primarily by an increase in acquired
loan accretion, higher rates, and the additional portfolio of higher-yielding fixed rate loans acquired in the Standard transaction,
partially offset by growth in the securities portfolio and the continued shift of loan originations and mix to lower-yielding floating
rate loans.
Total noninterest income was $163.1 million for 2017 compared to $159.3 million for 2016. Total fee-based revenues increased
by 6.9% for 2017 compared to 2016, due primarily to services provided to customers acquired in the Standard and Premier
transactions and organic growth in wealth management and treasury management services, partly offset by lower card-based fees.
36
Total noninterest expense was $415.9 million for 2017, increasing by 22.5% compared to 2016. This increase is primarily the
result of operating costs associated with the Standard and Premier transactions and compensation costs associated with merit
increases and investments in additional talent to support organizational growth.
A detailed discussion of net interest income and noninterest income and expense is presented in the following section of this Item
7 titled "Earnings Performance" below.
As of December 31, 2017, our securities available-for-sale portfolio totaled $1.9 billion, down 1.8%, from December 31, 2016.
For a detailed discussion of our securities portfolio, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Investment Portfolio Management" below.
Total loans of $10.4 billion as of December 31, 2017 reflects growth of $2.2 billion, or 26.5%, from December 31, 2016. This
growth was driven primarily by loans acquired in the Standard transaction and sales production of the corporate and consumer
lending teams.
Non-performing assets represented 0.89% of total loans plus OREO as of December 31, 2017 compared to 1.12% as of
December 31, 2016 and 0.88% as of December 31, 2015.
For a detailed discussion of our loan portfolio and credit quality, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Loan Portfolio and Credit
Quality" below.
Total average funding sources of $11.9 billion for 2017 increased by $2.3 billion from 2016, due primarily to the deposits assumed
in the Standard acquisition. For a detailed discussion of our funding sources see the section of this Item 7 titled "Funding and
Liquidity Management" below.
Performance Overview for 2016 Compared with 2015
Net income for 2016 was $92.3 million, or $1.14 per share, compared to $82.1 million, or $1.05 per share, for 2015. Performance
for 2016 and 2015 was impacted by certain significant transactions: acquisition and integration related expenses associated with
completed and pending acquisitions (both 2016 and 2015), a lease cancellation fee recognized as a result of the Company's planned
2018 corporate headquarters relocation (2016), a net gain on a sale-leaseback transaction (2016), and property valuation adjustments
related to strategic branch initiatives (2015). Excluding these certain significant transactions, earnings per share was $1.22 for
2016 and $1.13 for 2015. The increase in net income and earnings per share reflects the benefit of the Peoples acquisition completed
during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the NI Bancshares acquisition completed during the first quarter of 2016, organic loan
growth, and increases in fee-based revenues, partially offset by higher noninterest expenses and provision for loan losses.
Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.60% for 2016 compared to 3.68% for 2015, driven primarily by organic growth in floating
rate loans, lower acquired loan accretion, and the addition of FHLB advances, partially offset by the reinvestment of other interest-
earning assets into higher-yielding securities.
Total noninterest income was $159.3 million for 2016 compared to $136.6 million for 2015. Total fee-based revenues increased
by 14.0% for 2016 compared to 2015, driven mainly by services provided to customers added in the Peoples and NI Bancshares
acquisitions and continued growth in mortgage banking and capital market products income.
Total noninterest expense was $339.5 million for 2016, increasing by 10.5% compared to 2015. Excluding certain significant
transactions, total noninterest expense was $324.2 million for 2016, increasing by $27.0 million, or 9.1%, from 2015. This increase
is primarily the result of operating costs associated with the NI Bancshares and Peoples transactions and compensation costs
associated with merit increases and investments in additional talent to support organizational growth.
As of December 31, 2016 our securities available-for-sale portfolio totaled $1.9 billion, rising $612.8 million, or 46.9%, from
December 31, 2015. Growth for 2016 reflects purchases of certain securities and $125.8 million in securities acquired in the NI
Bancshares acquisition.
Total loans of $8.3 billion as of December 31, 2016 reflects growth of $1.1 billion, or 15.3%, from December 31, 2015. This
growth was driven primarily by strong sales production of the corporate and consumer lending teams and the acquisition of NI
Bancshares, which represents $279.7 million of loans at December 31, 2016.
Non-performing assets represented 1.12% of total loans plus OREO as of December 31, 2016 compared to 0.88% as of
December 31, 2015.
Total average funding sources of $9.5 billion for 2016 increased by $1.1 billion from 2015, due primarily to the deposits assumed
in the Peoples and NI Bancshares acquisitions and the addition of $740.1 million of FHLB advances.
37
EARNINGS PERFORMANCE
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is our primary source of revenue and is impacted by interest rates and the volume and mix of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The accounting policies for the recognition of interest income on loans, securities, and other
interest-earning assets are presented in Note 1 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Our accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and general practices within the banking industry. For purposes of this
discussion, both net interest income and net interest margin have been adjusted to a fully tax-equivalent basis to more appropriately
compare the returns on certain tax-exempt loans and securities to those on taxable interest-earning assets. The effect of this
adjustment is shown at the bottom of Table 2. Although we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors'
understanding of our business and performance, they should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. For a discussion of non-
GAAP financial measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
Table 2 summarizes our average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2017,
2016, and 2015, the related interest income and interest expense for each earning asset category and funding source, and the
average interest rates earned and paid. Table 3 details differences in interest income and expense from prior years and the extent
to which any changes are attributable to volume and rate fluctuations.
38
Table 2
Net Interest Income and Margin Analysis
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2017
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Rate
(%)
Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Rate
(%)
Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Rate
(%)
$
229,814
$
2,643
1.15
$
250,553
$
1,603
0.64
$
650,450
$
2,089
0.32
19,462
251
1,681,978
35,569
262,169
1,963,609
9,759
45,579
60,649
1,626
10,163,119
467,829
1.29
2.11
3.72
2.32
2.68
4.60
17,795
229
1,454,713
28,724
310,949
1,783,457
13,521
42,474
47,001
1,041
7,870,081
341,857
1.29
1.97
4.35
2.38
2.21
4.34
17,941
795,281
399,471
1,212,693
184
18,082
21,351
39,617
38,564
1,465
6,865,157
303,492
1.03
2.27
5.34
3.27
3.80
4.42
12,417,191
517,677
4.17
9,951,092
386,975
3.89
8,766,864
346,663
3.95
187,219
(95,054)
1,469,337
$13,978,693
$ 2,039,986
1,990,021
1,925,273
5,955,280
1,558,831
7,514,111
622,091
194,891
8,331,093
3,520,737
11,851,830
293,983
1,832,880
$13,978,693
1,568
2,640
2,739
6,947
9,237
16,184
9,100
12,428
0.08
0.13
0.14
0.12
0.59
0.22
1.46
6.38
37,712
0.45
146,070
(82,449)
919,527
$10,934,240
$ 1,629,917
1,634,029
1,639,746
4,903,692
1,230,658
6,134,350
497,563
197,515
6,829,428
2,711,687
9,541,115
156,519
1,236,606
1,174
1,096
1,805
4,075
5,788
9,863
6,313
12,465
0.07
0.07
0.11
0.08
0.47
0.16
1.27
6.31
28,641
0.42
130,525
(74,028)
878,690
$ 9,702,051
$ 1,463,168
1,390,616
1,561,432
4,415,216
1,201,848
5,617,064
151,032
201,041
5,969,137
2,479,072
8,448,209
121,784
1,132,058
$10,934,240
$ 9,702,051
1,073
691
1,920
3,684
5,843
9,527
2,314
12,545
0.07
0.05
0.12
0.08
0.49
0.17
1.53
6.24
24,386
0.41
479,965
3.87
358,334
3.60
322,277
3.68
(7,961)
$ 472,004
(8,643)
$ 349,691
(10,679)
$ 311,598
$ 33,923
0.28
$ 14,568
0.15
$ 16,298
0.19
$ 446,042
3.59
$ 343,766
3.45
$ 305,979
3.49
Assets
Other interest-earning assets . . . .
Securities:
Trading - taxable. . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities - taxable .
Investment securities -
nontaxable (1). . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB and Federal Reserve
Bank stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans (1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-earning
assets (1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and due from banks . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW accounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market deposits . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing
core deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing
deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . .
Total interest-bearing
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total funding sources . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders' equity - common . .
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest
income/margin (1) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent adjustment. . . . . .
Net interest income (GAAP) .
Impact of acquired loan
accretion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest
income/margin, adjusted (1)
(1)
Interest income and yields on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%. The
corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded in income tax expense. These adjustments have no impact on net income.
For a discussion of tax-equivalent net interest income/margin, net interest income (GAAP), and tax-equivalent net interest income/margin, adjusted,
see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
(2) Non-accrual loans, which totaled $66.9 million as of December 31, 2017, $59.3 million as of December 31, 2016, and $29.4 million as of December 31,
2015, are included in loans for purposes of this analysis. Additional detail regarding non-accrual loans is presented in the section of this Item 7 titled
"Non-Performing Assets and Performing Potential Problem Loans."
39
2017 Compared to 2016
Net interest income was $472.0 million for 2017 compared to $349.7 million for 2016, an increase of 35.0%. This increase was
driven primarily by the acquisition of interest-earning assets and acquired loan accretion from the Standard transaction early in
the first quarter of 2017, organic loan growth, and higher interest rates.
Acquired loan accretion contributed $33.9 million and $14.6 million to net interest income for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.87% for 2017, increasing by 27 basis points from 2016. The rise in tax-equivalent net
interest margin was driven primarily by a 13 basis point increase in acquired loan accretion combined with the positive impact of
higher interest rates. In addition, the impact of adding a portfolio of higher-yielding fixed-rate loans acquired from Standard
contributed to the increase, partially offset by growth in the securities portfolio and the continued shift of loan originations and
mix to lower-yielding floating rate loans.
Total average interest-earning assets were $12.4 billion for 2017, an increase of $2.5 billion, or 24.8%, from 2016. The increase
resulted from interest-earning assets acquired in the Standard transaction, loan growth, and security purchases. In addition, interest-
earning assets acquired in the NI Bancshares transaction late in the first quarter of 2016 contributed to the increase.
Total average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $1.5 billion to $8.3 billion for 2017 from $6.8 billion for 2016. The increase
resulted primarily from deposits acquired in the Standard transaction and the addition of FHLB advances during 2017. Deposits
acquired in the NI Bancshares transaction also contributed to the increase.
2016 Compared to 2015
Tax-equivalent net interest income was $358.3 million for 2016 compared to $322.3 million for 2015, an increase of 11.2%. This
increase was driven primarily by organic loan growth, the acquisition of interest-earning assets from the NI Bancshares transaction
late in the first quarter of 2016 and the Peoples transaction late in the fourth quarter of 2015, and the redeployment of other interest-
earning assets into securities, partially offset by higher borrowed funds costs from the addition of $740.1 million of FHLB advances
during 2016.
Acquired loan accretion contributed $14.6 million and $16.3 million to net interest income for 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.60% for 2016, decreasing 8 basis points from 2015. The decline was due primarily to
organic growth in floating rate loans, lower acquired loan accretion, and the addition of FHLB advances, partially offset by the
reinvestment of other interest-earning assets into higher-yielding securities.
Total average interest-earning assets were $10.0 billion for 2016, an increase of $1.2 billion, or 13.5%, from 2015, which reflects
organic loan growth and security purchases, as well as $528.8 million of interest-earning assets acquired in the NI Bancshares
transaction and $96.2 million of interest-earning assets acquired in the Peoples transaction.
Compared to 2015, total average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $860.3 million, or 14.4%, during 2016. The increase
resulted primarily from deposits acquired in the NI Bancshares and Peoples transactions and the addition of FHLB advances during
2016.
40
Table 3
Changes in Net Interest Income Applicable to Volumes and Interest Rates (1)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2017 compared to 2016
Rate
Total
Volume
2016 compared to 2015
Rate
Total
Volume
Other interest-earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities:
Trading – taxable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities – taxable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities – nontaxable (2). . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank stock . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total tax-equivalent interest income (2) . . . . . . . .
Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing core deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total tax-equivalent interest expense . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest income (2). . . . . . . .
$
(121) $
1,161
$
1,040
$
(1,794) $
1,308
$
(486)
22
4,656
(1,314)
3,364
338
104,488
108,069
251
313
364
928
1,762
2,690
1,617
(219)
4,088
$ 103,981
$
—
2,189
(2,448)
(259)
247
21,484
22,633
143
1,231
570
1,944
1,687
3,631
1,170
182
4,983
17,650
22
6,845
(3,762)
3,105
585
125,972
130,702
394
1,544
934
2,872
3,449
6,321
2,787
(37)
9,071
$ 121,631
$
(1)
12,649
(4,252)
8,396
469
43,526
50,597
101
161
129
391
44
435
4,038
(227)
4,246
46,351
$
46
(2,007)
(3,578)
(5,539)
(893)
(5,161)
(10,285)
—
244
(244)
—
(99)
(99)
(39)
147
9
(10,294) $
45
10,642
(7,830)
2,857
(424)
38,365
40,312
101
405
(115)
391
(55)
336
3,999
(80)
4,255
36,057
(1)
(2)
For purposes of this table, changes which are not due solely to volume changes or rate changes are allocated to each category on the basis of the
percentage relationship of each to the sum of the two.
Interest income and yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial
measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
41
Noninterest Income
A summary of noninterest income for the three years ended December 31, 2017 is presented in the following table.
Table 4
Noninterest Income Analysis
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2017
2015
2017-2016
2016-2015
% Change
Service charges on deposit accounts . . . . . . . .
Wealth management fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Card-based fees (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Merchant servicing fees (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital market products income. . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage banking income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other service charges, commissions, and fees .
Total fee-based revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOLI income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities (losses) gains (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on sale-leaseback transaction. . . . . . .
Total noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
48,368
41,321
28,992
10,340
8,171
8,131
9,843
155,166
5,946
(1,876)
3,913
—
163,149
$
$
40,665
33,071
29,104
12,533
10,024
10,162
9,542
145,101
3,647
1,420
3,635
5,509
159,312
$
$
39,979
29,162
26,984
11,739
4,806
5,741
8,848
127,259
4,185
2,373
2,764
—
136,581
18.9
24.9
(0.4)
(17.5)
(18.5)
(20.0)
3.2
6.9
63.0
(232.1)
7.6
(100.0)
2.4
1.7
13.4
7.9
6.8
108.6
77.0
7.8
14.0
(12.9)
(40.2)
31.5
100.0
16.6
(1) Card-based fees consist of debit and credit card interchange fees for processing transactions as well as various fees on both customer and non-customer
ATM and point-of-sale transactions processed through the ATM and point-of-sale networks. The related cardholder expenses are included in noninterest
expense for each period presented.
(2) Merchant servicing fees are included in other service charges, commissions, and fees in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The related merchant
card expense is included in noninterest expense for each period presented.
(3)
For a discussion of this item, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Investment Portfolio Management."
(4) Other income consists primarily of safe deposit box rentals, miscellaneous recoveries, and gains on the sales of various assets.
2017 Compared to 2016
Total fee-based revenues were $155.2 million, rising by 6.9% compared to 2016. Excluding the negative $6.3 million impact to
card-based fees due to the reduction in interchange revenue as the Durbin Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act ("Durbin") became
effective in the second half of 2017, total fee-based revenues increased by 11.3% from 2016. Fee-based revenues were positively
impacted by services provided to customers acquired in the Standard and Premier transactions completed in the first quarter of
2017 and organic growth in wealth management and treasury management services. Assets under management grew to $10.7
billion, a rise of $2.1 billion, or 24.1%, from 2016, driven primarily by organic growth and the addition of $863.4 million in trust
assets under management from the Standard and Premier transactions, which contributed approximately $5.6 million to wealth
management fees during 2017. In addition, the full year impact of customers acquired in the NI Bancshares transaction late in the
first quarter of 2016 contributed to the increase in fee-based revenues compared to 2016.
The decline in merchant servicing fees reflected lower customer volumes, offset by the decline in merchant card expense included
in noninterest expense. The decline in capital market products income compared to 2016 was in-line with lower origination volumes
compared to the same period.
Mortgage banking income during 2017 resulted from sales of $252.7 million of 1-4 family mortgage loans in the secondary market
compared to sales of $283.3 million during 2016. In addition, mortgage banking income for 2017 was negatively impacted by
changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, which fluctuate from year to year.
BOLI income for 2017 was positively impacted by benefit settlements.
Net securities losses of $1.9 million were recognized during 2017 in connection with gains from the strategic repositioning of the
securities portfolio in the third quarter, which were more than offset by losses in the fourth quarter due to certain actions taken in
light of federal income tax reform.
During 2016, the Company completed a sale-leaseback transaction of 55 branches that resulted in a pre-tax gain of $88.0 million,
net of transaction related expenses, of which $5.5 million was immediately recognized and the remaining $82.5 million was
42
deferred and will be accreted over future periods. Accretion related to the deferred gain was $5.9 million and $1.5 million in 2017
and 2016, respectively, and is included in net occupancy and equipment expense.
2016 Compared to 2015
Total noninterest income was $159.3 million for 2016, increasing by 16.6% from 2015. Total fee-based revenues were $145.1
million, rising by 14.0% compared to 2015, reflecting growth across all categories. Approximately one-third of the increase in
fee-based revenues was driven by services provided to customers acquired in the NI Bancshares and Peoples transactions. In
addition, card-based fees increased as a result of higher transaction volumes and capital market products income grew due to
higher sales to commercial clients.
The increase in mortgage banking income during 2016 was due primarily to sales of $283.3 million of 1-4 family mortgage loans
in the secondary market compared to sales of $180.0 million during 2015. In addition, mortgage banking income for 2016 was
positively impacted by changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, which fluctuate from year to year.
Assets under management grew to $8.6 billion, a rise of $1.2 billion, or 15.7%, from 2015, driven primarily by the addition of
$700.0 million in trust assets under management from the NI Bancshares transaction, which contributed approximately $4.0 million
to wealth management fees during 2016.
Noninterest Expense
A summary of noninterest expense for the three years ended December 31, 2017 is presented in the following table.
Table 5
Noninterest Expense Analysis
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
% Change
2017-2016
2016-2015
Salaries and employee benefits:
Salaries and wages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retirement and other employee benefits . . . . . . . .
Total salaries and employee benefits. . . . . . . . . .
Net occupancy and equipment expense . . . . . . . . . .
Professional services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Technology and related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FDIC premiums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising and promotions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Merchant card expense (1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cardholder expenses (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net OREO expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition and integration related expenses. . . . . .
Lease cancellation fee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property valuation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
182,507
41,886
224,393
49,751
33,689
18,068
8,987
8,694
8,377
7,323
4,683
31,821
20,123
—
—
415,909
$
$
151,341
33,309
184,650
41,154
25,122
14,765
6,268
7,787
10,782
5,812
3,024
24,834
14,352
950
—
339,500
$
$
133,739
31,852
165,591
38,720
22,720
14,581
6,017
7,606
9,886
5,243
5,281
21,601
1,389
—
8,581
307,216
(1)
(2)
The related merchant servicing fees are included in noninterest income for each period presented.
The related card-based fees are included in noninterest income for each period presented.
2017 Compared to 2016
20.6
25.7
21.5
20.9
34.1
22.4
43.4
11.6
(22.3)
26.0
54.9
28.1
40.2
(100.0)
—
22.5
13.2
4.6
11.5
6.3
10.6
1.3
4.2
2.4
9.1
10.9
(42.7)
15.0
933.3
100.0
(100.0)
10.5
Total noninterest expense for 2017 increased by 22.5% compared to 2016. Salaries and wages and advertising and promotions
expense were impacted by the special bonus and charitable contribution in connection with federal income tax reform in 2017. In
addition, both periods were impacted by acquisition and integration related expenses and 2016 was impacted by a lease cancellation
fee as a result of the Company's planned 2018 corporate headquarters relocation. Excluding these items, total noninterest expense
increased to $392.3 million, up 21.0% compared to $324.2 million in 2016. Operating costs associated with the Standard and
Premier transactions, which impacted most categories, drove the increase in total noninterest expense from 2016.
43
The increase in salaries and wages was also impacted by merit increases and investments in additional talent to support growth.
Higher loan remediation expenses and certain costs associated with organizational growth contributed to the rise in professional
services. Net OREO expense increased due to higher valuation adjustments and operating expenses, partially offset by net gains
on sales of OREO properties.
2016 Compared to 2015
Total noninterest expense for 2016 increased by 10.5% compared to 2015. For both years, total noninterest expense was impacted
by certain significant transactions: acquisition and integration related expenses (both 2016 and 2015), the lease cancellation fee
recognized as a result of the Company's planned 2018 corporate headquarters relocation (2016), and property valuation adjustments
related to strategic branch initiatives (2015). Excluding these adjustments, total noninterest expense was $324.2 million for 2016,
increasing by $27.0 million, or 9.1%, from 2015. Operating costs associated with the NI Bancshares and Peoples transactions
drove the increase in total noninterest expense from 2015. These costs occurred primarily within salaries and employee benefits,
net occupancy and equipment expense, advertising and promotions, and other expenses. In addition, the increase in salaries and
wages for 2016 was impacted by compensation costs associated with merit increases and investments in additional talent to support
organizational growth.
Net OREO expense for 2016 decreased by 42.7% compared to 2015 due to reduced valuation adjustments and lower operating
expenses, partially offset by net losses on sales of OREO properties realized during 2016.
Compared to 2015, the increase in professional services and a portion of the rise in other expenses resulted from organizational
growth needs for 2016. In addition, higher loan remediation expenses and vendor commissions related to the origination of
equipment finance loans contributed to the increase in professional services from 2015.
Property valuation adjustments of $8.6 million were recognized during 2015 on twelve closed branches and seven parcels of land
as part of the Company's strategic branch initiatives.
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes includes both federal and state income tax expense. An analysis of the provision for income taxes
is detailed in the following table.
Table 6
Income Tax Expense Analysis
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Income before income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 187,954
Income tax expense:
2017
Years Ended December 31,
2016
$ 138,520
2015
$ 119,811
Federal income tax expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
State income tax expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
81,321
8,246
89,567
$
$
38,962
7,209
46,171
$
$
30,572
7,175
37,747
Effective income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective income tax rate, excluding revaluations of DTAs (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47.7%
35.0%
33.3%
33.3%
31.5%
31.5%
(1)
This is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of revaluations of DTAs related to federal income tax reform and changes in Illinois
income tax rates for 2017. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information
and Reconciliations."
Federal income tax expense and the related effective income tax rate are influenced by the amount of tax-exempt income derived
from investment securities and BOLI in relation to pre-tax income as well as state income taxes. State income tax expense and
the related effective income tax rate are driven by the amount of state tax-exempt income in relation to pre-tax income and state
tax rules related to consolidated/combined reporting and sourcing of income and expense.
Federal income tax reform was enacted on December 22, 2017. Among other things, the new law (i) establishes a new, flat corporate
federal statutory income tax rate of 21%, (ii) eliminates the corporate alternative minimum tax and allows the use of any such
carryforwards to offset regular tax liability for any taxable year, (iii) limits the deduction for net interest expense incurred by U.S.
corporations, (iv) allows businesses to immediately expense, for tax purposes, the cost of new investments in certain qualified
depreciable assets, (v) eliminates or reduces certain deductions related to meals and entertainment expenses, (vi) modifies the
44
limitation on excessive employee remuneration to eliminate the exception for performance-based compensation and clarifies the
definition of a covered employee, and (vii) limits the deductibility of deposit insurance premiums. Federal income tax reform also
significantly changes U.S. tax law related to foreign operations, however, such changes do not currently impact the Company.
Income tax expense for 2017 was impacted by the downward revaluation of DTAs by $26.6 million in the fourth quarter due to
federal income tax reform as well as a $2.8 million benefit in the third quarter as a result of changes in Illinois income tax rates.
Excluding these items, the Company's effective income tax rate was 35.0% for 2017 compared to 33.3% for 2016, up due to a rise
in income subject to tax at statutory rates and increases in state statutory rates. The increases in income tax expense and the effective
tax rate from 2015 to 2016 were due primarily to a rise in income subject to tax at statutory rates, partially offset by decreases in
state statutory rates.
Our accounting policies regarding the recognition of income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and
Income are described in Notes 1 and 15 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Investment Portfolio Management
Securities that we have the intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as securities held-to-maturity and are accounted
for using historical cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Trading securities are carried at fair
value and consist of securities held in a grantor trust for our nonqualified deferred compensation plan and are not considered part
of the traditional investment portfolio. All other securities are classified as securities available-for-sale and are carried at fair value
with unrealized gains and losses, net of related deferred income taxes, recorded in stockholders' equity as a separate component
of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
We manage our investment portfolio to maximize the return on invested funds within acceptable risk guidelines, to meet pledging
and liquidity requirements, and to adjust balance sheet interest rate sensitivity to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates
on net interest income.
From time to time, we adjust the size and composition of our securities portfolio based on a number of factors, including expected
loan growth, anticipated changes in collateralized public funds on account, the interest rate environment, and the related value of
various segments of the securities markets. The following table provides a summary of our investment portfolio.
Table 7
Investment Portfolio
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2017
As of December 31,
2016
2015
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
% of
Total
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
% of
Total
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
% of
Total
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities.
$
46,529
$
46,345
U.S. agency securities .
157,636
156,847
CMOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,113,019
1,095,186
MBSs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Municipal securities . . .
CDOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . .
Total securities
available-for-sale . . .
373,676
209,558
—
7,408
369,543
208,991
—
7,297
2.5
8.3
58.1
19.6
11.1
—
0.4
$
48,581
$
48,541
183,528
183,637
1,064,130
1,047,446
337,139
273,319
47,681
3,206
332,655
270,846
33,260
3,065
2.5
9.6
54.6
17.3
14.1
1.7
0.2
$
17,000
$
16,980
86,461
695,198
152,481
321,437
48,287
3,282
86,643
687,185
153,530
327,570
31,529
3,199
1.3
6.6
52.6
11.8
25.1
2.4
0.2
$1,907,826
$1,884,209
100.0
$1,957,584
$1,919,450
100.0
$1,324,146
$1,306,636
100.0
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Municipal securities . . .
$
13,760
$
12,013
$
22,291
$
18,212
$
23,152
$
20,054
45
Portfolio Composition
As of December 31, 2017, our securities available-for-sale portfolio totaled $1.9 billion, decreasing by $35.2 million, or 1.8%,
from December 31, 2016, following a 46.9% increase from December 31, 2015. The decrease from December 31, 2016 was driven
by securities sales of $629.8 million and $349.4 million of maturities, calls, and prepayments, partially offset by purchases of
$733.4 million, consisting primarily of CMOs and MBSs. Purchase and sale activity during 2017 was driven primarily by the
opportunistic repositioning of the securities portfolio in light of market conditions in the second half of the year as well as strategic
actions in connection with federal income tax reform. The proceeds from sales of securities were reinvested in higher-yielding
securities with similar durations. For additional detail regarding sales of securities, see the "Realized Losses and Gains" section
of this Item 7 below.
Investments in municipal securities consist of general obligations of local municipalities in various states. Our municipal securities
portfolio has historically experienced very low default rates and provides a predictable cash flow.
The following table presents the effective duration, average life, and yield to maturity for the Company's securities portfolio by
category as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Table 8
Securities Effective Duration Analysis
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Effective
Duration (1)
2017
Average
Life (2)
As of December 31,
Yield to
Maturity (3)
Effective
Duration (1)
2016
Average
Life (2)
Yield to
Maturity (3)
1.01%
1.80%
3.36%
3.77%
4.47%
—
N/M
3.38%
1.03
3.22
4.51
5.29
4.87
—
N/M
4.51
1.30%
1.74%
2.35%
2.30%
3.04%
—
N/M
2.34%
1.39%
2.65%
3.76%
4.15%
4.17%
N/M
N/M
3.72%
1.42
3.89
4.49
5.62
2.51
N/M
N/M
4.27
0.99%
1.55%
1.88%
2.07%
3.85%
N/M
N/M
2.14%
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities. . . . . . . . . .
U.S. agency securities . . . . . . . . . .
CMOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MBSs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
CDOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total securities available-for-sale
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.33%
7.15
4.55%
6.47%
9.08
3.98%
N/M – Not meaningful.
(1)
The effective duration represents the estimated percentage change in the fair value of the securities portfolio given a 100 basis point increase or decrease
in interest rates. This measure is used to evaluate the portfolio's price volatility at a single point in time and is not intended to be a precise predictor of
future fair values since those values will be influenced by a number of factors.
(2) Average life is presented in years and represents the weighted-average time to receive half of all expected future cash flows using the dollar amount
of principal paydowns, including estimated principal prepayments, as the weighting factor.
(3) Yields on municipal securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%.
Effective Duration
The average life and effective duration of our securities available-for-sale portfolio were 4.51 years and 3.38%, respectively, as
of December 31, 2017, compared to 4.27 and 3.72% as of December 31, 2016. The increase in average life and decrease in effective
duration resulted from maturities and sales of securities that were reinvested in higher-yielding, lower-duration CMOs and MBSs.
Realized Losses and Gains
There were $1.9 million of net securities losses recognized for the year ended December 31, 2017 on securities with carrying
values of $631.7 million. Net securities losses for 2017 were driven primarily by the opportunistic repositioning of the securities
portfolio in light of market conditions in the second half of the year as well as strategic actions in connection with federal income
tax reform, which included the liquidation of $47.7 million of CDOs. In addition, $214.1 million of securities were acquired in
the Standard transaction during the first quarter of 2017, of which $210.2 million were sold shortly after the acquisition date and
resulted in no gains or losses as they were recorded at fair value upon acquisition.
46
Net securities gains of $1.4 million for 2016 resulted from the sale of municipal securities at gains of $1.1 million, and sales of
MBSs and CMOs at net gains of $304,000.
Net securities gains of $2.4 million for 2015 resulted from the sale of MBSs at gains of $1.9 million, and sales of CMOs, municipal
securities, and other investments at net gains of $521,000.
Unrealized Gains and Losses
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale represent the difference between the aggregate cost and fair value of
the portfolio. These amounts are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and reported as a separate
component of stockholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive loss on an after-tax basis. This balance sheet component
will fluctuate as current market interest rates and conditions change and affect the aggregate fair value of the portfolio. As of
December 31, 2017, net unrealized losses totaled $23.6 million compared to net unrealized losses of $38.1 million at December 31,
2016. The decrease is due primarily to the sale of CDOs in 2017, which had unrealized losses of $14.4 million at December 31,
2016.
Net unrealized losses in the CMO portfolio totaled $17.8 million as of December 31, 2017 compared to $16.7 million as of
December 31, 2016. CMOs are either backed by U.S. government-owned agencies or issued by U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises. We do not believe any individual unrealized loss on these securities as of December 31, 2017 represents OTTI related
to credit deterioration. In addition, we do not intend to sell the CMOs with unrealized losses and we do not believe it is more likely
than not that we will be required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. For additional
discussion of unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, see Note 4 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Table 9
Repricing Distribution and Portfolio Yields
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2017
One Year or Less
One Year to Five Years
Five Years to Ten Years
After 10 years
Amortized
Cost
Yield to
Maturity (1)
Amortized
Cost
Yield to
Maturity (1)
Amortized
Cost
Yield to
Maturity (1)
Amortized
Cost
Yield to
Maturity (1)
$
32,532
1.16% $
13,997
1.62% $
28,536
132,345
52,730
26,310
—
2.22%
2.35%
2.31%
3.04%
—%
125,958
812,070
232,216
183,248
—
1.62%
2.35%
2.30%
3.04%
—%
—
3,142
—
—
—
7,408
—% $
2.34%
—%
—%
—%
N/M
—
—
168,604
88,730
—
—
—%
—%
2.33%
2.30%
—%
—%
$ 272,453
2.25% $1,367,489
2.36% $
10,550
0.70% $ 257,334
2.32%
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . .
U.S. agency securities . . . . . . . . .
CMOs (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MBSs (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Municipal securities (3). . . . . . . . .
Equity securities (4) . . . . . . . . . . .
Total available-for-sale
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Municipal securities (3). . . . . . . . .
$
1,432
4.00% $
5,831
4.42% $
2,243
5.31% $
4,254
4.50%
N/M – Not meaningful.
(1) Based on amortized cost.
(2)
The repricing distributions and yields to maturity of CMOs and MBSs are based on estimated future cash flows and prepayment assumptions. Actual
repricings and yields of the securities may differ from those reflected in the table depending on actual interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(3) Yields on municipal securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%. The maturity date of bonds is based
on contractual maturity, unless the bond, based on current market prices, is deemed to have a high probability that the call will be exercised, in which
case the call date is used as the maturity date.
(4) Yields on equity securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%. Maturity dates are based on contractual
maturity or repricing characteristics.
47
LOAN PORTFOLIO AND CREDIT QUALITY
Our principal source of revenue is generated by our lending activities and is composed primarily of interest income as well as loan
origination and commitment fees (net of related costs). The accounting policies for the recording of loans in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition and the recognition and/or deferral of interest income and fees in the Consolidated Statements
of Income are included in Note 1 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Portfolio Composition
Our loan portfolio is comprised of both corporate and consumer loans with corporate loans representing 81.6% of total loans as
of December 31, 2017. Consistent with our emphasis on relationship banking, the majority of our corporate loans are made to our
core, multi-relationship customers. The customers usually maintain deposit relationships and utilize our other banking services,
such as treasury or wealth management services.
To maximize loan income with an acceptable level of risk, we have certain lending policies and procedures that management
reviews on a regular basis. In addition, management receives periodic reporting related to loan production, loan quality, credit
concentrations, loan delinquencies, and non-performing and corporate performing potential problem loans to monitor and mitigate
potential and current risks in the portfolio.
Table 10
Loan Portfolio
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
% of
Total
2016
% of
Total
2015
% of
Total
2014
% of
Total
2013
Commercial and industrial.
$ 3,529,914
33.8
$ 2,827,658
34.3
$ 2,524,726
35.3
$ 2,261,230
33.6
$ 1,841,765
Agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . .
430,886
4.1
389,496
4.7
387,440
5.4
359,737
5.3
326,931
% of
Total
32.3
5.7
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and
industrial . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial
real estate . . . . . . . . . . .
Total commercial
real estate . . . . . . . . . .
1,979,820
19.0
1,581,967
19.2
1,395,586
19.5
1,495,225
22.2
1,377,544
24.1
675,463
539,820
6.5
5.2
614,052
451,540
7.4
5.4
528,343
216,882
7.4
3.0
565,494
207,775
8.4
3.1
337,275
195,320
5.9
3.4
1,358,515
13.0
979,528
11.9
931,368
13.0
897,965
13.3
839,638
14.7
4,553,618
Total corporate loans.
8,514,418
Home equity. . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . .
827,055
774,357
321,982
43.7
81.6
7.9
7.4
3.1
3,627,087
6,844,241
747,983
423,922
237,999
43.9
82.9
9.1
5.1
2.9
3,072,179
5,984,345
674,883
364,885
137,602
42.9
83.6
9.4
5.1
1.9
3,166,459
5,787,426
568,419
303,557
77,451
47.0
85.9
8.4
4.6
1.1
2,749,777
4,918,473
458,553
290,961
46,373
48.1
86.1
8.0
5.1
0.8
Total consumer loans . . .
1,923,394
18.4
1,409,904
17.1
1,177,370
16.4
949,427
14.1
795,887
13.9
Total loans . . . . . . .
$ 10,437,812
100.0
$ 8,254,145
100.0
$ 7,161,715
100.0
$ 6,736,853
100.0
$ 5,714,360
100.0
2017 Compared to 2016
Total loans of $10.4 billion as of December 31, 2017 reflect growth of $2.2 billion, or 26.5%, from December 31, 2016. Excluding
loans related to customers and locations acquired in the Standard transaction, total loans grew by approximately 7% from December
31, 2016. Growth in commercial and industrial loans, primarily within our sector-based lending businesses and multi-family loans,
contributed to the increase in total corporate loans. Total loans were also impacted by the addition of 1-4 family mortgages,
installment loans, and shorter-duration, floating rate home equity loans.
2016 Compared to 2015
Total loans of $8.3 billion as of December 31, 2016 reflect growth of $1.1 billion, or 15.3%, from December 31, 2015 including
loans acquired in the NI Bancshares transaction of $279.7 million, or 11.3%, excluding these acquired loans. Growth in commercial
and industrial loans resulted primarily from broad-based increases within our middle market and sector-based lending business
units. Office, retail, and industrial and multi-family loans increased compared to December 31, 2015 due to organic growth. The
rise in construction loans compared to the same period was driven primarily by select commercial projects for which permanent
48
financing is expected upon their completion. The rise in consumer loans compared to December 31, 2015 resulted from the
continued expansion of mortgage and installment loans and the addition of shorter-duration, floating rate home equity loans.
Comparisons of Prior Years (2015, 2014, and 2013)
Total loans of $7.2 billion as of December 31, 2015 reflect growth of $424.9 million, or 6.3%, from December 31, 2014. This
growth was driven primarily by strong sales production of the corporate lending teams and growth in consumer loans. In addition,
the Peoples acquisition completed in the fourth quarter of 2015 contributed $53.9 million in loans. Growth in corporate loans was
concentrated within our commercial and industrial loan category, reflective of the continued expansion into sector-based lending
areas. The overall decline in commercial real estate loans from December 31, 2014 resulted from the decision of certain customers
to opportunistically sell their commercial businesses and investment real estate properties or use excess liquidity to payoff long-
term debt. These decreases more than offset organic commercial real estate growth. Consumer loans totaled $1.2 billion as of
December 31, 2015 and increased $227.9 million, or 24.0%, from December 31, 2014. This growth reflects the addition of shorter-
duration, floating rate home equity loans, and growth in 1-4 family mortgages.
Total loans of $6.7 billion as of December 31, 2014 reflected growth of $1.0 billion, or 17.9%, from December 31, 2013. Excluding
loans acquired in the Popular and Great Lakes transactions of $718.3 million, total loans grew $304.2 million from December 31,
2013. Solid performance from our legacy sales platform concentrated within our commercial and industrial, agricultural, and
multi-family loan categories reflected the continued impact of greater resource investments and expansion into sector-based lending
areas. Excluding loans acquired in the Popular and Great Lakes transactions of $93.5 million, consumer loans increased $60.0
million, or 7.5%, which reflects the addition of shorter-duration home equity loans.
Commercial, Industrial, and Agricultural Loans
Commercial, industrial, and agricultural loans represent 37.9% of total loans, and totaled $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2017,
an increase of $743.6 million, or 23.1%, from December 31, 2016. Our commercial and industrial loans are a diverse group of
loans generally located in the Chicago metropolitan area with purposes that include supporting seasonal working capital needs,
accounts receivable financing, inventory and equipment financing, and select sector-based lending, such as healthcare, asset-based
lending, structured finance, and syndications. Our commercial and industrial portfolio does not have significant direct exposure
to the oil and gas industry. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets,
such as accounts receivable or inventory. The underlying collateral securing commercial and industrial loans may fluctuate in
value due to the success of the business or economic conditions. For loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds
for repayment and economic conditions may impact the cash flow of the borrower. Accordingly, the underwriting for these loans
is based primarily on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower
and may incorporate a personal guarantee.
Agricultural loans are generally provided to meet seasonal production, equipment, and farm real estate borrowing needs of
individual and corporate crop and livestock producers. Seasonal crop production loans are repaid by the liquidation of the financed
crop that is typically covered by crop insurance. Equipment and real estate term loans are repaid through cash flows of the farming
operation. Risks uniquely inherent in agricultural loans relate to weather conditions, agricultural product pricing, and loss of crops
or livestock due to disease or other factors. Therefore, as part of the underwriting process, the Company examines projected future
cash flows, financial statement stability, and the value of the underlying collateral.
Commercial Real Estate Loans
Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans. The
repayment of commercial real estate loans depends on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business
conducted on the property securing the loan. This category of loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate
market. In addition, many commercial real estate loans do not fully amortize over the term of the loan, but have balloon payments
due at maturity. The borrower's ability to make a balloon payment may depend on the availability of long-term financing or their
ability to complete a timely sale of the underlying property. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans
based on cash flow, collateral, geography, and risk rating criteria.
Construction loans are generally made based on estimates of costs and values associated with the completed projects and are
underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analyses of absorption and lease rates, and
financial analyses of the developers and property owners. Sources of repayment may be permanent long-term financing, sales of
developed property, or an interim loan commitment until permanent financing is obtained. Generally, construction loans have a
higher risk profile than other real estate loans since repayment is impacted by real estate values, interest rate changes, governmental
regulation of real property, demand and supply of alternative real estate, the availability of long-term financing, and changes in
general economic conditions.
49
The following table provides commercial real estate loan detail as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Table 11
Commercial Real Estate Loans
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2017
% of
Total
As of December 31,
% of
Total
2016
2015
% of
Total
Office, retail, and industrial:
Office. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate:
Multi-use properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rental properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warehouses and storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restaurants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service stations and truck stops . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hotels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recreational. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Automobile dealers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate. . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
844,413
471,781
663,626
1,979,820
675,463
539,820
330,926
197,579
172,505
112,547
107,834
97,016
87,986
39,020
213,102
1,358,515
$ 4,553,618
18.5
10.4
14.6
43.5
14.8
11.8
7.3
4.3
3.8
2.5
2.4
2.1
1.9
0.9
4.7
29.9
100.0
$
599,572
412,614
569,781
1,581,967
614,052
451,540
236,430
159,134
136,853
63,067
51,403
41,780
58,390
53,671
178,800
979,528
$ 3,627,087
16.5
11.4
15.7
43.6
16.9
12.4
6.5
4.4
3.8
1.7
1.4
1.2
1.6
1.5
5.0
27.1
100.0
$
479,506
434,241
481,839
1,395,586
528,343
216,882
202,225
131,522
137,223
78,017
78,459
46,889
57,967
50,580
148,456
931,338
$ 3,072,149
15.6
14.1
15.7
45.4
17.2
7.1
6.6
4.3
4.5
2.5
2.6
1.5
1.9
1.6
4.8
30.3
100.0
Commercial real estate loans represent 43.7% of total loans and totaled $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2017, increasing by $926.5
million, or 25.5%, from December 31, 2016.
The mix of properties securing the loans in our commercial real estate portfolio is balanced between owner-occupied and investor
categories and is diverse in terms of type and geographic location, generally within the Company's markets. Approximately 43%
of the commercial real estate portfolio, excluding multi-family and construction loans, is owner-occupied as of December 31,
2017. Using outstanding loan balances, non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans to total capital was 213% and construction
loans to total capital was 28% as of December 31, 2017. Non-owner-occupied (investor) commercial real estate is calculated in
accordance with federal banking agency guidelines and includes construction, multi-family, non-farm non-residential property,
and commercial real estate loans that are not secured by real estate collateral.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loans represent 18.4% of total loans, and totaled $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2017, an increase of $513.5 million,
or 36.4%, from December 31, 2016. Consumer loans are centrally underwritten using a credit scoring model developed by the
Fair Isaac Corporation ("FICO"), which employs a risk-based system to determine the probability that a borrower may default.
Underwriting standards for home equity loans are heavily influenced by statutory requirements, which include loan-to-value and
affordability ratios, risk-based pricing strategies, and documentation requirements. The home equity category consists mainly of
revolving lines of credit secured by junior liens on owner-occupied real estate. Loan-to-value ratios on home equity loans and 1-4
family mortgages are based on the current appraised value of the collateral. Repayment for these loans is dependent on the borrower's
continued financial stability, and is more likely to be impacted by adverse personal circumstances.
50
Maturity and Interest Rate Sensitivity of Corporate Loans
The following table summarizes the maturity distribution and interest rate sensitivity of our corporate loan portfolio as of
December 31, 2017, For additional discussion of interest rate sensitivity, see Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk," of this Form 10-K.
Table 12
Maturities and Sensitivities of Corporate Loans to Changes in Interest Rates
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Maturity Due In
One Year or
Less
Greater Than
One to Five
Years
Greater Than
Five Years
Total
As of December 31, 2017
Commercial, industrial, and agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total corporate loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans by interest rate type:
Fixed interest rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Floating interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total corporate loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
1,491,076
$
1,716,975
1,041,289
2,737,414
2,532,365
$
4,454,389
$
$
752,749
$
3,960,800
774,915
4,553,618
1,527,664
$
8,514,418
1,097,092
$
1,898,491
$
339,326
$
3,334,909
1,435,273
2,555,898
1,188,338
5,179,509
2,532,365
$
4,454,389
$
1,527,664
$
8,514,418
As of December 31, 2017, the composition of our corporate loans between fixed and floating interest rates was 39% and 61%,
respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the Company hedged $980.0 million of certain corporate variable rate loans using interest
rate swaps through which the Company receives fixed amounts and pays variable amounts. Including the impact of these interest
rate swaps, 49% of the loan portfolio consisted of fixed rate loans and 51% were floating rate loans as of December 31, 2017. See
Note 19 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for detail regarding interest rate swaps.
51
Non-performing Assets and Performing Potential Problem Loans
The following table presents our loan portfolio by performing and non-performing status. A discussion of our accounting policies
for non-accrual loans, TDRs, and loans 90 days or more past due can be found in Note 1 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Table 13
Loan Portfolio by Performing/Non-performing Status
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Accruing
As of December 31, 2017
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . .
Agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate . . . . .
Total corporate loans. . . . . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans. . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2016
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . .
Agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail and industrial . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate . . . . .
Total corporate loans. . . . . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PCI (1)
Current
30-89 Days
Past Due
90 Days
Past Due
Non-accrual (2)
Total
Loans
$
5,450
7,203
$ 3,458,049
423,007
$
$
24,005
280
$
1,830
177
40,580
219
$ 3,529,914
430,886
14,575
14,071
8,778
64,675
102,099
114,752
2,745
18,080
1,113
21,938
136,690
1,950,564
657,878
530,264
1,287,522
4,426,228
8,307,284
815,014
750,555
318,065
1,883,634
$ 10,190,918
2,167
512
$ 2,788,891
388,067
12,398
12,225
4,442
12,219
41,284
43,963
615
14,949
1,459
17,023
60,986
1,546,078
600,054
446,480
961,709
3,554,321
6,731,279
738,213
403,521
234,805
1,376,539
$ 8,107,818
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,776
3,117
198
2,380
8,471
32,756
3,252
1,310
2,407
6,969
39,725
6,288
—
5,085
858
332
1,182
7,457
13,745
3,581
2,241
1,476
7,298
21,043
$
$
$
345
20
371
317
1,053
3,060
98
—
397
495
3,555
374
736
1,129
604
—
1,526
3,259
4,369
109
272
259
640
5,009
$
$
$
11,560
377
209
3,621
15,767
56,566
5,946
4,412
—
10,358
66,924
1,979,820
675,463
539,820
1,358,515
4,553,618
8,514,418
827,055
774,357
321,982
1,923,394
$ 10,437,812
29,938
181
$ 2,827,658
389,496
17,277
311
286
2,892
20,766
50,885
5,465
2,939
—
8,404
59,289
1,581,967
614,052
451,540
979,528
3,627,087
6,844,241
747,983
423,922
237,999
1,409,904
$ 8,254,145
(1)
(2)
PCI loans with an accretable yield are considered current.
Includes PCI loans of $763,000 and $681,000 as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which no longer have an accretable yield
as estimates of expected future cash flows have decreased since the acquisition date due to credit deterioration.
52
The following table provides a comparison of our non-performing assets and past due loans to prior periods.
Table 14
Non-performing Assets and Past Due Loans
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Non-accrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
90 days or more past due loans, still
accruing interest (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-performing loans. . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruing TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-performing assets . . . . . . . . . .
30-89 days past due loans (1) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-accrual loans to total loans . . . . . . . . .
Non-performing loans to total loans . . . . . .
Non-performing assets to loans plus
OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
$
66,924
$
59,289
$
29,430
$
66,157
$
80,740
$
$
3,555
70,479
1,796
20,851
93,126
39,725
0.64%
0.68%
0.89%
$
$
5,009
64,298
2,291
26,083
92,672
21,043
0.72%
0.78%
1.12%
$
$
3,057
32,487
2,743
27,782
63,012
16,705
0.41%
0.45%
0.88%
$
$
6,175
72,332
3,704
34,966
111,002
22,638
0.98%
1.07%
1.64%
$
$
21,789
102,529
23,770
41,336
167,635
22,974
1.41%
1.79%
2.91%
Interest income not recognized in the financial statements related to non-accrual loans for 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,576
(1)
PCI loans with an accretable yield are considered current and not included in past due loan totals.
Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets represented 0.89% of total loans and OREO at December 31, 2017, compared to 1.12% and 0.88%
at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Included in non-performing assets as of December 31, 2017 was $5.3 million of
OREO acquired in the Standard transaction.
As of December 31, 2016, non-performing assets increased by $29.7 million, or 47.1%, from December 31, 2015. This increase
resulted primarily from the transfer of five corporate loan relationships to non-accrual status during 2016.
As of December 31, 2015, non-performing assets decreased by $48.0 million, or 43.2%, from December 31, 2014, due mainly to
lower levels of non-accrual loans. The improvement in non-accrual loans related primarily to the final resolution of a large
commercial loan relationship originally identified in the second half of 2014, for which a specific reserve was then established.
In addition, lower levels of covered non-performing assets contributed to the decrease.
Non-performing assets decreased by $56.6 million, or 33.8%, from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014. This decrease was
driven primarily by the return of three TDRs totaling $20.7 million to performing status, sales of OREO properties, and a decline
in 90 days or more past due loans.
53
TDRs
Loan modifications may be performed at the request of an individual borrower and may include reductions in interest rates, changes
in payments, and extensions of maturity dates. We occasionally restructure loans at other than market rates or terms to enable the
borrower to work through financial difficulties for a period of time, and these restructured loans remain classified as TDRs for
the remaining terms of the loans. A discussion of our accounting policies for TDRs can be found in Note 1 of "Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Table 15
TDRs by Type
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Number of
Loans
Amount
Number of
Loans
Amount
Number of
Loans
Amount
11
$
19,223
3
$
431
5
$
1,344
4
3
1
8
19
15
11
26
45
14
31
45
$
$
$
$
4,236
723
192
5,151
24,374
824
1,131
1,955
26,329
1,796
24,533
26,329
6,345
1,977
3
3
3
9
12
16
11
27
39
18
21
39
$
$
$
$
4,888
754
316
5,958
6,389
997
1,202
2,199
8,588
2,291
6,297
8,588
1,492
—
1
3
3
7
12
17
11
28
40
23
17
40
$
$
$
$
164
784
340
1,288
2,632
1,161
1,274
2,435
5,067
2,743
2,324
5,067
2,687
758
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate loans. . . . .
Total corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruing TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-accrual TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-to-date charge-offs on TDRs . . . . . . .
Specific reserves related to TDRs. . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2017, TDRs totaled $26.3 million, increasing by $17.7 million from December 31, 2016. The increase was
driven primarily by the extension of two non-accrual credits during 2017. The December 31, 2017 total includes $1.8 million in
loans that are accruing interest, with the majority restructured at market terms. After a sufficient period of performance under the
modified terms, the loans restructured at market rates will be reclassified to performing status.
As of December 31, 2016, TDRs totaled $8.6 million, increasing by $3.5 million from December 31, 2015. This increase was
driven primarily by the addition of two corporate loan relationships to non-accrual TDR status.
54
Corporate Performing Potential Problem Loans
Corporate performing potential problem loans consist of special mention loans and substandard loans, excluding accruing TDRs.
These loans are performing in accordance with their contractual terms, but we have concerns about the ability of the borrower to
continue to comply with loan terms due to the borrower's operating or financial difficulties.
Table 16
Corporate Performing Potential Problem Loans
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Special
Mention (1)
70,863
$
Substandard (2)
30,074
$
Total (3)
$ 100,937
Special
Mention (1)
92,340
$
Substandard (2)
66,266
$
Total (3)
$ 158,606
Agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,989
5,732
16,721
17,039
5,894
22,933
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . .
Multi-family. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate. . . .
Total commercial real estate . . .
Total corporate performing
potential problem loans(4). . .
Corporate performing potential
problem loans to corporate loans . .
Corporate PCI performing potential
problem loans included in the total
above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25,546
7,395
10,184
29,624
72,749
38,977
1,802
7,516
20,933
69,228
64,523
9,197
17,700
50,557
141,977
33,852
3,972
111
11,808
49,743
39,513
2,029
12,197
13,544
67,283
73,365
6,001
12,308
25,352
117,026
$
154,601
$
105,034
$ 259,635
$
159,122
$
139,443
$ 298,565
1.82%
1.23%
3.05%
2.33%
2.04%
4.36%
$
17,685
$
26,635
$
44,320
$
1,868
$
13,598
$
15,466
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Loans categorized as special mention exhibit potential weaknesses that require the close attention of management since these potential weaknesses
may result in the deterioration of repayment prospects in the future.
Loans categorized as substandard exhibit a well-defined weakness that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. These loans continue to accrue
interest because they are well-secured and collection of principal and interest is expected within a reasonable time.
Total corporate performing potential problem loans excludes accruing TDRs of $657,000 as of December 31, 2017 and $834,000 as of December 31,
2016.
Includes corporate PCI performing potential problem loans.
Corporate performing potential problem loans were 3.05% of corporate loans as of December 31, 2017, down from 4.36% as of
December 31, 2016. The Standard acquisition added corporate performing potential problem loans that were designated as PCI.
Management has specific monitoring and remediation plans associated with these loans.
55
OREO
OREO consists of properties acquired as the result of borrower defaults on loans. OREO was $20.9 million as of December 31,
2017, compared to $26.1 million as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, total OREO includes $5.3 million that was
acquired in the Standard transaction. A discussion of our accounting policies for OREO is contained in Note 1 of "Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Table 17
OREO Properties by Type
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Single-family homes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land parcels:
$
Raw land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Farm land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial lots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Single-family lots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total land parcels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
OREO Activity
2017
As of December 31,
2016
2015
837
$
2,595
$
850
—
8,698
2,150
11,698
48
8,268
20,851
$
1,464
—
8,176
947
10,587
48
12,853
26,083
$
A rollforward of OREO balances for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is presented in the following table.
Table 18
OREO Rollforward
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers from loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gains (losses) on sales of OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OREO valuation adjustments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending Balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
Allowance for Credit Losses
Methodology for the Allowance for Credit Losses
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
26,083
6,255
8,424
(19,326)
1,451
(2,036)
20,851
$
$
3,965
1,464
—
9,207
1,719
12,390
426
11,001
27,782
27,782
4,173
2,863
(7,539)
(222)
(974)
26,083
The allowance for credit losses is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded commitments and is
maintained by management at a level believed adequate to absorb estimated losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio.
Determination of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective since it requires significant estimates and management
judgment, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of
homogeneous loans, and consideration of current economic trends.
Acquired loans are recorded at fair value, which incorporates credit risk, at the date of acquisition. No allowance for credit losses
is recorded on the acquisition date for such loans. As the acquisition adjustment is accreted into income over future periods, an
allowance for credit losses is established as necessary to reflect credit deterioration. In addition, certain acquired loans that have
renewed subsequent to their respective acquisition dates are no longer classified as acquired loans. Instead, they are included with
our loan population that is allocated an allowance in accordance with our allowance for loan losses methodology.
56
While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
depends on a variety of factors beyond the Company's control, including the performance of its loan portfolio, the economy,
changes in interest rates and property values, and the interpretation of loan risk ratings by regulatory authorities. Management
believes that the allowance for credit losses is an appropriate estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of
December 31, 2017.
The accounting policy for the allowance for credit losses can be found in Note 1 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements"
in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
An allowance for credit losses is established on loans originated by the Bank, acquired loans, and covered loans. Additional
discussion regarding acquired and covered loans can be found in Notes 1 and 6 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements"
in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The following table provides additional details related to acquired loans, the allowance for credit
losses as related to acquired loans, and the remaining acquisition adjustment associated with acquired loans as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Table 19
Allowance for Credit Losses and Acquisition Adjustment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2017
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining acquisition adjustment (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining acquisition adjustment to acquired loans . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2016
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining acquisition adjustment (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining acquisition adjustment to acquired loans . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A - Not applicable.
Loans, Excluding
Acquired Loans
Acquired Loans (1)
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
84,217
(21,236)
31,142
94,123
8,822,560
N/A
1.07%
N/A
73,268
(18,208)
29,157
84,217
7,620,100
N/A
1.11%
N/A
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,866
(408)
148
2,606
1,615,252
74,677
0.16%
4.62%
1,587
(322)
1,601
2,866
634,045
22,574
0.45%
3.56%
87,083
(21,644)
31,290
96,729
10,437,812
74,677
0.93%
N/A
74,855
(18,530)
30,758
87,083
8,254,145
22,574
1.06%
N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
These amounts and ratios relate to the loans acquired in completed acquisitions.
The remaining acquisition adjustment consists of $43.5 million and $31.2 million relating to PCI and non-purchased credit impaired ("non-PCI") loans,
respectively, as of December 31, 2017, and $10.8 million and $11.8 million relating to PCI and non-PCI loans, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.
The allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding acquired loans is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial
measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
Excluding acquired loans, the allowance for credit losses to total loans was 1.07% as of December 31, 2017. The acquisition
adjustment increased by $52.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, due primarily to the Standard transaction. This
was partially offset by acquired loan accretion, resulting in a remaining acquisition adjustment as a percent of acquired loans of
4.62% as of December 31, 2017. Acquired loans that are renewed are no longer classified as acquired loans. These loans totaled
$366.0 million and $117.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are included in loans, excluding acquired
loans, in the table above and allocated an allowance in accordance with our allowance for loan losses methodology. In addition,
there is an allowance for credit losses of $2.6 million on acquired loans.
57
Table 20
Allowance for Credit Losses and
Summary of Credit Loss Experience
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Change in allowance for credit losses
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
87,083
$
74,855
$
74,510
$
87,121
$
102,812
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Years Ended December 31,
Loan charge-offs:
Commercial, industrial, and agricultural . . . . . .
22,885
Office, retail, and industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loan charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries of loan charge-offs:
Commercial, industrial, and agricultural . . . . . .
Office, retail, and industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total recoveries of loan charge-offs . . . . . . . .
Net loan charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Decrease) increase in reserve for unfunded
commitments (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total provision for loan losses and
other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserve for unfunded commitments . . . . . . . . . .
Total allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to loans (2) . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to loans,
excluding acquired loans (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to
non-accrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for credit losses to
non-performing loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
190
—
38
755
6,955
30,823
4,150
2,935
39
270
244
1,541
9,179
21,644
31,290
9,982
4,707
307
134
2,932
5,231
23,293
2,451
337
97
56
524
1,298
4,763
18,530
30,983
16,422
2,899
568
139
2,678
4,211
26,917
2,588
534
15
350
2,031
1,183
6,701
20,216
21,152
17,776
7,388
948
1,343
4,975
7,754
40,184
3,858
693
97
303
2,487
767
8,205
31,979
19,168
13,282
5,235
1,029
3,086
5,828
10,120
38,580
3,797
228
584
1,032
1,646
1,095
8,382
30,198
16,257
—
(225)
(591)
200
(1,750)
$
$
$
$
$
$
31,290
96,729
95,729
1,000
96,729
0.93%
1.07%
$
$
$
30,758
87,083
86,083
1,000
87,083
1.06%
1.11%
$
$
$
20,561
74,855
73,630
1,225
74,855
1.05%
1.11%
$
$
$
19,368
74,510
72,694
1,816
74,510
1.11%
1.24%
14,507
87,121
85,505
1,616
87,121
1.52%
1.52%
144.54%
146.88%
254.35%
112.63%
107.90%
137.25%
135.44%
230.42%
103.01%
84.97%
Average loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 10,163,119
$
7,864,851
$
6,858,193
$
6,109,928
$
5,475,110
Net loan charge-offs to average loans . . . . . . . . .
0.21%
0.24%
0.29%
0.52%
0.55%
(1)
(2)
(3)
Included in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
This ratio includes acquired loans that are recorded at fair value through an acquisition adjustment, which incorporates credit risk as of the acquisition
date with no allowance for credit losses being established at that time. As the acquisition adjustment is accreted into income over future periods, an
allowance for credit losses is established as necessary to reflect credit deterioration. See the Allowance for Credit Losses and Acquisition Adjustment
table above for further discussion of the allowance for acquired loan losses and the related acquisition adjustment.
The allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding acquired loans is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial
measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
58
Activity in the Allowance for Credit Losses
Net loan charge-offs to average loans declined to 0.21% for 2017 compared to 0.24% for 2016 and 0.29% for 2015. The improvement
since 2013, and all other prior periods presented, reflects management's continued efforts to remediate problem credits.
The allowance for credit losses increased to $96.7 million as of December 31, 2017 from $87.1 million as of December 31, 2016,
and $74.9 million as of December 31, 2015, driven primarily by loan growth and the impact of establishing an allowance on
acquired loans. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses to total loans to 0.93% as of December 31, 2017 from 1.06% as of
December 31, 2016 was due primarily to loans acquired in the Standard transaction.
The allowance for credit losses remained consistent at $74.9 million as of December 31, 2015 compared to $74.5 million as of
December 31, 2014. This stability in the allowance for credit losses reflects the sustained improvement in our non-performing
loan levels and the related credit metrics.
The allowance for credit losses declined by 14.5% to $74.5 million as of December 31, 2014 from $87.1 million as of December 31,
2013, reflecting reductions across most categories. This decrease in the allowance for credit losses reflected continuing improvement
in our non-performing loans and the related credit metrics resulting from management's ongoing credit remediation focus.
Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses
Table 21
Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
% of
Total
Loans (1)
2017
% of
Total
Loans (1)
2016
As of December 31,
% of
Total
Loans (1)
2015
% of
Total
Loans (1)
2014
% of
Total
Loans (1)
2013
$ 55,791
37.9
$ 40,709
39.0
$ 37,074
40.7
$ 31,177
38.9
$ 32,162
38.0
10,996
19.0
17,595
19.2
13,124
19.5
13,053
22.2
11,881
2,534
3,501
7,121
24,152
16,786
6.5
5.2
13.0
43.7
18.4
3,261
3,586
8,306
32,748
13,626
7.4
5.4
11.9
43.9
17.1
2,469
1,533
6,682
23,808
13,973
7.4
3.0
13.0
42.9
16.4
2,387
3,503
8.4
3.1
2,069
8,517
9,533
13.3
15,035
28,476
14,857
47.0
14.1
37,502
17,457
24.1
5.9
3.4
14.7
48.1
13.9
$ 96,729
100.0
$ 87,083
100.0
$ 74,855
100.0
$ 74,510
100.0
$ 87,121
100.0
Commercial, industrial, and
agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and
industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real
estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total commercial
real estate . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total allowance for
credit losses. . . . . . . . .
(1) Percentages represent total loans in each category to total loans.
INVESTMENT IN BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
We previously purchased life insurance policies on the lives of certain directors and officers and are the sole owner and beneficiary
of the policies. We invested in these BOLI policies to provide an efficient form of funding for long-term retirement and other
employee benefit costs. Therefore, our BOLI policies are intended to be long-term investments to provide funding for long-term
liabilities. We record these BOLI policies as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at each
policy's respective cash surrender value ("CSV") with changes recorded as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. As of December 31, 2017, the CSV of BOLI assets totaled $279.9 million. Income and proceeds for BOLI
policies are not subject to income taxation.
As of December 31, 2017, 50.1% of our total BOLI portfolio is invested in general account life insurance distributed among fifteen
insurance carriers, all of which carry investment grade ratings. This general account life insurance typically includes a feature
guaranteeing minimum returns. The remaining 49.9% is in separate account life insurance, which is managed by third-party
investment advisors under pre-determined investment guidelines. Stable value protection is a feature available for separate account
life insurance policies that is designed to protect a policy's CSV from market fluctuations, within limits, on underlying investments.
Our entire separate account portfolio has stable value protection purchased from a highly rated financial institution. To the extent
fair values on individual contracts fall below 80% of their CSV, the CSV of the specific contracts may be reduced or the underlying
assets may be transferred to short-duration investments, resulting in lower earnings.
59
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had BOLI income of $5.9 million compared to prior year BOLI income of $3.6 million.
GOODWILL
The carrying amount of goodwill was $697.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and $340.9 million as of December 31, 2016.
Goodwill increased by $356.7 million from December 31, 2016, which consisted of $345.3 million related to the Standard
acquisition, $11.0 million related to the Premier acquisition, and a $423,000 measurement period adjustment related to finalizing
the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the NI Bancshares acquisition. For additional detail regarding goodwill,
see Note 9 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment or when events or circumstances indicate a need to perform interim tests, as described
in Note 1 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. During 2017, we performed our annual
impairment test of goodwill at October 1, 2017 and determined that goodwill was not impaired at that date and there was no
indication that goodwill was impaired as of December 31, 2017.
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. For additional discussion of
income taxes, see Notes 1 and 15 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Income tax
expense recorded due to changes in uncertain tax positions is also described in Note 15.
Table 22
Deferred Tax Assets
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Net DTAs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
64,736
2017
As of December 31,
2016
100,207
$
$
% Change
2015
2017-2016
86,693
(35.4)
2016-2015
15.6
Management assessed whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the DTAs will not be realized. This assessment
considered whether, in the periods of reversal, the DTAs can be realized through carryback to income in prior years, future reversals
of existing deferred tax liabilities, and future taxable income, including taxable income resulting from the application of future
tax planning strategies. The assessment also considered positive and negative evidence, including pre-tax income during the current
and prior two years, actual performance compared to budget, trends in non-performing assets and corporate performing potential
problem loans, the Company's capital position, and any unsettled circumstances that could impact future earnings. Based on this
assessment, management determined that it is more likely than not that our DTAs will be fully realized and no valuation allowance
is required as of December 31, 2017.
Net DTAs decreased in 2017 due primarily to the downward revaluation of DTAs by $26.6 million related to federal income tax
reform, partly offset by a $2.8 million benefit due to changes in the Illinois income tax rates. In addition, accelerated tax gains
associated with the disposition of assets resulting from the sale-leaseback transaction and securities valuation adjustments, partially
offset by the utilization of net operating loss and credit carryforwards contributed to the decrease. Net DTAs increased in 2016
due primarily to accelerated tax gains associated with the disposition of assets resulting from the sale-leaseback transaction and
securities valuation adjustments, partially offset by the utilization of net operating loss and credit carryforwards.
FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
Liquidity measures the ability to meet current and future cash flows as they become due. Our approach to liquidity management
is to obtain funding sources at a minimum cost to meet fluctuating deposit, withdrawal, and loan demand needs. Our liquidity
policy establishes parameters to maintain flexibility in responding to changes in liquidity needs over a 12-month forward-looking
period, including the requirement to formulate a quarterly liquidity compliance plan for review by the Bank's Board of Directors.
The compliance plan includes an analysis that measures projected needs to purchase and sell funds and incorporates a set of
projected balance sheet assumptions that are updated quarterly. Based on these assumptions, we determine our total cash liquidity
on hand and excess collateral capacity from pledging, unused federal funds purchased lines, and other unused borrowing capacity,
such as FHLB advances, resulting in a calculation of our total liquidity capacity. Our total policy-directed liquidity requirement
is to have funding sources available to cover 50.0% of non-collateralized, non-FDIC insured, non-maturity deposits. Based on
our projections as of December 31, 2017, we expect to have liquidity capacity in excess of policy guidelines for the forward twelve-
month period.
The liquidity needs of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis (the "Parent Company") consist primarily of
operating expenses, debt service payments, and dividend payments to our stockholders, which totaled $82.6 million for the year
60
ended December 31, 2017. The primary source of liquidity for the Parent Company is dividends from subsidiaries. The Parent
Company had $48.2 million in junior subordinated debentures, $146.9 million in subordinated notes, and cash and interest-bearing
deposits of $120.8 million as of December 31, 2017. On September 27, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with
U.S. Bank National Association providing for a $50.0 million short-term, unsecured revolving credit facility. On September 26,
2017, the Company entered into a first amendment to this credit facility, which extends the maturity to September 26, 2018. As
of December 31, 2017, no amount was outstanding under the facility. The Parent Company has the ability to enhance its liquidity
position by raising capital or incurring debt.
Total deposits and borrowed funds as of December 31, 2017 are summarized in Notes 10 and 11 of "Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The following table provides a comparison of average funding sources over
the last three years. We believe that average balances, rather than period-end balances, are more meaningful in analyzing funding
sources because of the normal fluctuations that may occur on a daily or monthly basis within funding categories.
Table 23
Funding Sources - Average Balances
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
% Change
% of
Total
2017-2016
2016-2015
2017
% of
Total
Demand deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,520,737
Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market accounts . . . . . . .
Core deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brokered deposits . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,039,986
1,990,021
1,925,273
9,476,017
1,539,383
19,448
Total time deposits. . . . . . . . .
1,558,831
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . .
11,034,848
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal funds purchased . . . . . . .
120,700
—
FHLB advances. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
501,391
Other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total borrowed funds. . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . .
—
622,091
194,891
29.7
17.2
16.8
16.3
80.0
13.0
0.2
13.2
93.2
1.0
—
4.2
—
5.2
1.6
2016
$ 2,711,687
1,629,917
1,634,029
1,639,746
7,615,379
1,211,554
19,104
1,230,658
8,846,037
123,898
—
373,344
321
497,563
197,515
% of
Total
28.4
17.1
17.1
17.2
79.8
12.7
0.2
12.9
92.7
1.3
—
3.9
—
5.2
2.1
2015
$ 2,479,072
1,463,168
1,390,616
1,561,432
6,894,288
1,185,730
16,118
1,201,848
8,096,136
118,838
18
32,176
—
151,032
201,041
29.3
17.3
16.5
18.5
81.6
14.0
0.2
14.2
95.8
1.4
—
0.4
—
1.8
2.4
Total funding sources . . . .
$11,851,830
100.0
$ 9,541,115
100.0
$ 8,448,209
100.0
N/M – Not meaningful.
Average Funding Sources
29.8
25.2
21.8
17.4
24.4
27.1
1.8
26.7
24.7
(2.6)
—
34.3
(100.0)
25.0
(1.3)
24.2
9.4
11.4
17.5
5.0
10.5
2.2
18.5
2.4
9.3
4.3
(100.0)
1,060.3
N/M
229.4
(1.8)
12.9
Total average funding sources of $11.9 billion for 2017 increased by $2.3 billion, or 24.2%, from 2016. The rise in average core
deposits resulted primarily from $1.7 billion in core deposits assumed in the Standard acquisition, as well as organic growth.
Total average funding sources of $9.5 billion for 2016 increased by $1.1 billion, or 12.9%, from 2015, due primarily to $91.8
million and $594.9 million of deposits assumed in the Peoples and NI Bancshares acquisitions, respectively, and the addition of
$740.1 million of FHLB advances throughout 2016.
61
Time Deposits
Table 24
Maturities of Time Deposits Greater Than $100,000
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Three months or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Greater than three months to six months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Greater than six months to twelve months. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Greater than twelve months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2017
118,947
$
106,855
236,463
279,636
741,901
$
Borrowed Funds
Table 25
Borrowed Funds
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2017
2016
2015
Amount
Weighted-
Average
Rate %
Amount
Weighted-
Average
Rate %
Amount
Weighted-
Average
Rate %
At period-end:
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
124,884
0.07
$
129,008
0.05
$
155,196
—
590,000
714,884
—
1.22
1.02
$
—
750,000
879,008
—
0.60
0.52
—
9,900
$
165,096
Average for the year-to-date period:
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
120,700
0.07
$
123,898
0.08
$
118,838
Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
FHLB advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
501,391
Other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
1.80
—
—
373,344
321
Total borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
622,091
1.46
$
497,563
Maximum amount outstanding at the end of any day during the period:
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
140,764
$
174,266
Federal funds purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
FHLB advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
940,000
Other borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
750,000
2,400
—
1.66
3.74
1.27
$
$
18
32,176
—
151,032
163,982
1,300
62,500
—
0.17
—
0.40
0.18
0.07
—
6.93
—
1.53
Average borrowed funds totaled $622.1 million, $497.6 million, and $151.0 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The
increase in 2017 from 2016 and in 2016 from 2015 was due primarily to higher levels of FHLB advances. The weighted-average
rate on FHLB advances for the year-to-date periods was impacted by the hedging of $415.0 million and $325.0 million of FHLB
advances as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, using interest rate swaps through which the Company receives variable
amounts and pays fixed amounts. The weighted-average interest rate paid on these interest rate swaps was 2.17% and 2.19% as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For further discussion of interest rate swaps, see Note 19 of "Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
On September 27, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with U.S. Bank National Association providing for a $50.0
million short-term, unsecured revolving credit facility. On September 26, 2017, the Company entered into a first amendment to
this credit facility, which extends the maturity to September 26, 2018. Advances will bear interest at a rate equal to one-month
LIBOR plus 1.75%, adjusted on a monthly basis, and the Company must pay an unused facility fee equal to 0.35% per annum on
a quarterly basis. As of December 31, 2017, no amount was outstanding under the facility.
62
We make interchangeable use of repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, and federal funds purchased to supplement deposits.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase generally mature within 1 to 90 days from the transaction date.
Senior and Subordinated Debt
Average senior and subordinated debt decreased by $2.6 million, or 1.3%, from 2016 to 2017 and $3.5 million, or 1.8%, from
2015 to 2016. These decreases resulted from the timing of the maturity and repayment of $38.5 million of 5.850% subordinated
notes on April 1, 2016 and $115.0 million of the Company's 5.875% senior notes on November 22, 2016, which were partly offset
by the issuance and sale of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% subordinated notes due 2026, issued on
September 29, 2016. See Note 12 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional
discussion regarding these transactions.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK, AND CONTINGENT
LIABILITIES
Through our normal course of operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations and other commitments. These obligations
generally relate to the funding of operations through deposits or debt issuances, as well as leases for premises and equipment.
As a financial services provider, we routinely enter into commitments to extend credit. While contractual obligations represent
our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn. These
commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for our loans.
The following table presents our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations and significant commitments as of
December 31, 2017. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note of "Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Table 26
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Risk, and Contingent Liabilities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Note
Reference
10
10
11
12
8
16
15
20
20
One Year or
Less
$ 9,406,542
1,086,528
714,884
—
19,241
6,849
N/M
N/M
N/M
Payments Due In
Greater
Than One
to Three
Years
Greater Than
Three to
Five Years
Greater
Than Five
Years
Total
$
— $
— $
504,372
—
—
34,585
10,828
N/M
N/M
N/M
55,414
—
—
33,196
10,280
N/M
N/M
N/M
— $ 9,406,542
1,646,783
714,884
195,170
206,869
67,923
16,248
2,866,172
128,801
469
—
195,170
119,847
39,966
N/M
N/M
N/M
Core deposits (no stated maturity) . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Uncertain tax positions liability . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . .
Letters of credit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N/M – Not meaningful.
63
MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL
Capital Measurements
A strong capital structure is required under applicable banking regulations and is crucial in maintaining investor confidence,
accessing capital markets, and enabling us to take advantage of future growth opportunities. Our capital policy requires that the
Company and the Bank maintain capital ratios in excess of the minimum regulatory guidelines. It serves as an internal discipline
in analyzing business risks and internal growth opportunities and sets targeted levels of return on equity. Under regulatory capital
adequacy guidelines, the Company and the Bank are subject to various capital requirements set and administered by the federal
banking agencies. On January 1, 2015, the Company and the Bank became subject to the Basel III Capital rules, a new
comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations published by the Federal Reserve. These rules are discussed
in the "Supervision and Regulation" section in Item 1, "Business" of this Form 10-K. In addition, financial institutions, such as
the Company and the Bank, with average total consolidated assets greater than $10 billion are required by the Dodd-Frank Act
to conduct an annual company-run stress test of capital. The Company submitted its first required stress test report for the July
31, 2017 reporting date and the Bank will become subject to these stress test requirements starting with the July 31, 2018 reporting
date.
The following table presents our consolidated measures of capital as of the dates presented and the capital guidelines established
by the Federal Reserve for the Bank to be categorized as "well-capitalized." We manage our capital ratios for both the Company
and the Bank to consistently maintain these measurements in excess of the Federal Reserve's minimum levels to be considered
"well-capitalized," which is the highest capital category established. All regulatory mandated ratios for characterization as "well-
capitalized" were exceeded as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The tangible common equity ratios presented in the table below are capital adequacy metrics used and relied on by investors
and industry analysts; however, they are non-GAAP financial measures. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, see
the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
Table 27
Capital Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2016
2017
As of December 31, 2017
Regulatory
Minimum
For
Well-
Capitalized
Excess Over
Required Minimums
10.95%
10.13%
10.13%
9.10%
12.15%
10.10%
9.68%
8.99%
8.33%
8.58%
9.31%
10.73%
9.83%
9.83%
8.76%
12.23%
9.90%
9.39%
8.99%
8.05%
8.42%
8.88%
10.00%
8.00%
6.50%
5.00%
9% $ 112,557
27% $ 253,479
56% $ 431,716
82% $ 542,646
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bank regulatory capital ratios
Total capital to risk-weighted assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CET1 to risk-weighted assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital to average assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company regulatory capital ratios
Total capital to risk-weighted assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CET1 to risk-weighted assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital to average assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company tangible common equity ratios (1)(2)
Tangible common equity to tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity, excluding accumulated
other comprehensive income, to tangible assets . . . . . .
Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets . . . . . .
N/A - Not applicable.
(1) Ratios are not subject to formal Federal Reserve regulatory guidance.
(2)
Tangible common equity ratios are non-GAAP financial measures. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, see the section of this Item
7 titled "Non-GAAP Financial Information and Reconciliations."
64
Overall, the Company's regulatory capital ratios increased compared to December 31, 2016, due primarily to retained earnings
and certain actions taken by management to sell all of its $47.7 million in CDOs, which received significantly higher risk-
weightings for regulatory capital ratio calculation purposes. These increases were partially offset by the impact of the Standard
and Premier acquisitions in the first quarter of 2017.
The Board reviews the Company's capital plan each quarter, considering the current and expected operating environment as well
as evaluating various capital alternatives. For further details of the regulatory capital requirements and ratios as of December 31,
2017 and 2016 for the Company and the Bank, see Note 18 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of
this Form 10-K.
Stock Repurchase Programs
The Company maintains a Board-approved stock repurchase program by which shares of Company common stock may be
repurchased. Shares repurchased, whether as part of or outside of the Board-approved program, are held as treasury stock and
are available for issuance in connection with our qualified and nonqualified retirement plans, share-based compensation plans,
and other general corporate purposes. We reissued 133,907 treasury shares in 2017 and 119,823 treasury shares in 2016 pursuant
to these plans.
Dividends
The Company's Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share for the first quarter of 2015 and for each of the
quarters through the first quarter of 2017. The Company increased the quarterly dividend to $0.10 per share for each of the
quarters from the second quarter of 2017 through the fourth quarter of 2017. The dividend for the fourth quarter of 2017 represents
the 140th consecutive cash dividend paid by the Company since its inception in 1983.
65
QUARTERLY EARNINGS
Table 28
Quarterly Earnings Performance (1)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 129,585
$ 129,916
$ 126,516
$ 123,699
$
96,328
$
97,906
$
96,550
$
87,548
2017
2016
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,254
119,331
8,024
34,905
Noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
102,326
Income before income
tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic earnings per common share. .
Diluted earnings per common
share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common
share, adjusted (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared per common
share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average common equity .
Return on average common equity,
adjusted (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets. . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets,
adjusted (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest
income/margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
43,886
41,539
2,347
0.02
0.02
0.34
0.10
0.49%
7.20%
0.07%
10,023
119,893
10,109
43,348
97,190
55,942
17,707
38,235
0.37
0.37
0.33
0.10
8.10%
7.14%
1.07%
8,933
8,502
117,583
115,197
8,239
44,945
99,751
54,538
19,588
34,950
0.34
0.34
0.35
0.10
7.58%
7.74%
1.00%
$
$
$
$
$
4,918
39,951
116,642
33,588
10,733
22,855
0.23
0.23
0.34
0.09
5.20%
7.76%
0.68%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,304
88,024
5,307
39,711
92,669
29,759
9,041
20,718
0.25
0.25
0.32
0.09
6.42%
8.02%
0.72%
$
$
$
$
$
6,934
90,972
9,998
45,853
82,888
43,939
15,537
28,402
0.35
0.35
0.32
0.09
8.85%
8.03%
1.00%
$
$
$
$
$
6,569
89,981
8,085
37,822
81,354
38,364
13,097
25,267
0.31
0.31
0.32
0.09
8.13%
8.25%
0.93%
$
$
$
$
$
6,834
80,714
7,593
35,926
82,589
26,458
8,496
17,962
0.23
0.23
0.27
0.09
6.06%
7.09%
0.72%
0.96%
0.95%
1.02%
1.01%
0.90%
0.91%
0.94%
0.84%
3.84%
3.86%
3.88%
3.89%
3.44%
3.60%
3.72%
3.66%
(1) All ratios are presented on an annualized basis.
(2)
These ratios are non-GAAP financial measures. For a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, see the section of this Item 7 titled "Non-GAAP
Financial Information and Reconciliations."
Quarterly earnings performance was impacted by certain significant transactions for all periods presented, which include: the
downward revaluation of DTAs by $23.7 million due to federal income tax reform and changes in Illinois income tax rates (third
and fourth quarters of 2017), certain actions related to the securities portfolio resulting in pre-tax net securities losses of $2.2
million (third and fourth quarters of 2017), a special bonus to colleagues of $1.9 million pre-tax and a charitable contribution of
$1.6 million pre-tax (fourth quarter of 2017), pre-tax acquisition and integration related expenses of $384,000, $1.2 million, $18.6
million, $7.5 million, $1.2 million, $618,000, and $5.0 million (third, second and first quarters of 2017 and fourth, third, second,
and first quarters of 2016, respectively), a lease cancellation fee of $950,000 pre-tax (fourth quarter of 2016), and gain on a sale-
leaseback transaction of $5.5 million pre-tax (third quarter of 2016). Excluding these adjustments, earnings per share was $0.34,
$0.33, $0.35, and $0.34 for the fourth, third, second, and first quarters of 2017, respectively, compared to $0.32 for each of the
fourth, third, and second quarters of 2016 and $0.27 for the first quarter of 2016.
66
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and are consistent with general practices within the
banking industry. Application of GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments based on the best
available information as of the date of the financial statements that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Critical accounting estimates are those estimates that management believes are the most
important to our financial position and results of operations. Future changes in information may impact these estimates, assumptions,
and judgments, which may have a material effect on the amounts reported in the financial statements.
The most significant of our accounting policies and estimates are presented in Note 1 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this
discussion, these policies provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and
how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the
methods, estimates, assumptions, and judgments underlying those amounts, management determined that our accounting policies
for the allowance for credit losses, valuation of securities, income taxes, and goodwill and other intangible assets are considered
to be our critical accounting estimates.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The determination of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective since it requires significant estimates and management
judgment, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of
homogeneous loans, actual loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, and other factors, all of
which are susceptible to significant change. Credit exposures deemed to be uncollectible are charged-off against the allowance
for loan losses, while recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Additions to the
allowance for loan losses are established through the provision for loan losses charged to expense. The amount charged to operating
expense depends on a number of factors, including historic loan growth, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, net
charge-off levels, and our assessment of the allowance for loan losses. For additional discussion of the allowance for credit losses,
see Notes 1 and 7 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Valuation of Securities
The fair values of securities are based on quoted prices obtained from third-party pricing services or dealer market participants
where a ready market for such securities exists. In the absence of quoted prices or where a market for the security does not exist,
management judgment and estimation is used, which may include modeling-based techniques. The use of different judgments and
estimates to determine the fair value of securities could result in a different fair value estimate.
On a quarterly basis, we assess securities with unrealized losses to determine whether OTTI has occurred. In evaluating OTTI,
management considers many factors including the severity and duration of the impairment, the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, including external credit ratings and recent downgrades for debt securities, intent to hold the security until
its value recovers, and the likelihood that the Company would be required to sell the securities before a recovery in value, which
may be at maturity. The term "other-than-temporary" is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent. It indicates that the
prospects for near-term recovery are not necessarily favorable or there is a lack of evidence to support fair values greater than or
equal to the carrying value of the investment. Securities for which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be other-than-
temporary are written down to fair value with the write-down recorded as a realized loss and included in net securities (losses)
gains, but only to the extent the impairment is related to credit deterioration. The amount of the impairment related to other factors
is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) unless management intends to sell the security in a short period of time or
believes it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to full recovery. The determination of OTTI is
subjective and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing and amount of loss realization. For additional discussion
of securities, see Notes 1 and 4 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Income Taxes
We determine our income tax expense based on management's judgments and estimates regarding permanent differences in the
treatment of specific items of income and expense for financial statement and income tax purposes. These permanent differences
result in an effective tax rate that differs from the federal statutory rate. In addition, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities
in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition based on management's judgment and estimates regarding timing differences
in the recognition of income and expenses for financial statement and income tax purposes.
We assess the likelihood that any DTAs will be realized through the reduction or refund of taxes in future periods and establish a
valuation allowance for those assets for which recovery is not more likely than not. In making this assessment, management makes
judgments and estimates regarding the ability to realize the asset through carryback to taxable income in prior years, the future
reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income, and the possible application of future tax planning
67
strategies. Management believes that it is more likely than not that DTAs included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Financial Condition will be fully realized, although there is no guarantee that those assets will be recognizable in future periods.
Management also makes certain interpretations of federal and state income tax laws for which the outcome of the tax position
may not be certain. Uncertain tax positions are periodically evaluated and we may establish tax reserves for benefits that may not
be realized. For additional discussion of income taxes, see Notes 1 and 15 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in
Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired using the acquisition method of accounting.
This method requires that all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, both intangible and tangible,
be recorded at their estimated fair value upon acquisition. Determining the fair value often involves estimates based on third-party
valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. Goodwill
is not amortized, instead, we assess the potential for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events and circumstances
indicate that goodwill might be impaired.
Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance, but can be distinguished from goodwill because
of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination
with a related contract, asset, or liability. The determination of the useful lives over which an intangible asset will be amortized
is subjective. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently when events or circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. For additional discussion of goodwill and other intangible assets, see Notes 1
and 9 of "Notes to the Consolidated financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
68
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND RECONCILIATIONS
The Company's accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and general practices within the banking industry. As a
supplement to GAAP, the Company provides non-GAAP performance results, which the Company believes are useful because
they assist investors in assessing the Company's operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures include earnings
per share ("EPS"), adjusted, the efficiency ratio, return on average assets, adjusted, tax-equivalent net interest income (including
its individual components), tax-equivalent net interest margin, tax-equivalent net interest margin, adjusted, effective income tax
rate, excluding revaluations of DTAs, return on average common equity, adjusted, tangible common equity to tangible assets,
tangible common equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), to tangible assets, tangible common
equity to risk-weighted assets, return on average tangible common equity, and return on average tangible common equity, adjusted.
The Company presents EPS, the efficiency ratio, return on average assets, return on average common equity, and return on average
tangible common equity, all adjusted for certain significant transactions. These transaction include the revaluation of DTAs (fourth
and third quarters of 2017), certain actions resulting in securities losses and gains (fourth quarter and third quarters of 2017), a
special bonus to colleagues (fourth quarter of 2017), a charitable contribution to the First Midwest Charitable Foundation (fourth
quarter of 2017), acquisition and integration related expenses associated with completed and pending acquisitions (all periods
presented, excluding the fourth quarter of 2017), a lease cancellation fee recognized as a result of the Company's planned 2018
corporate headquarters relocation (fourth quarter of 2016), a net gain on sale-leaseback transaction (third quarter of 2016), property
valuation adjustments (2015), a gain on the sale of an equity investment (2013), losses on early extinguishment of debt (2013),
gain on the termination of FHLB commitments (2013), adjusted amortization of the FDIC indemnification asset (2013), and a
BOLI modification loss (2013). Management believes excluding these transactions from EPS, the efficiency ratio, return on average
assets, return on average common equity, and return on average tangible common equity is useful in assessing the Company's
underlying operational performance since these transactions do not pertain to its core business operations and their exclusion
facilitates better comparability between periods. Management believes that excluding acquisition and integration related expenses
from these metrics is useful to the Company, as well as analysts and investors, since these expenses can vary significantly based
on the size, type, and structure of each acquisition. Additionally, management believes excluding these transactions from these
metrics enhances comparability for peer comparison purposes.
The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income and net interest margin recognizes the income tax savings when comparing
taxable and tax-exempt assets and assumes a 35% tax rate. Management believes that it is standard practice in the banking industry
to present net interest income and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis and that it enhances comparability for peer
comparison purposes. In addition, management believes that presenting tax-equivalent net interest margin, excluding the impact
of acquired loan accretion, enhances comparability for peer comparison purposes and is useful to the Company, as well as analysts
and investors, since acquired loan accretion income may fluctuate based on the size of each acquisition, as well as from period to
period.
In management's view, tangible common equity measures are capital adequacy metrics meaningful to the Company, as well as
analysts and investors, in assessing the Company's use of equity and in facilitating comparisons with peers. These non-GAAP
measures are valuable indicators of a financial institution's capital strength since they eliminate intangible assets from stockholders'
equity and retain the effect of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders' equity.
The Company presents the allowance for credit losses to total loans, excluding acquired loans. Management believes excluding
acquired loans is useful as it facilitates better comparability between periods as these loans are recorded at fair value, which
incorporates credit risk, at the date of acquisition. No allowance for credit losses is recorded on the acquisition date. As the
acquisition adjustment is accreted into income over future periods, an allowance for credit losses is established as necessary to
reflect credit deterioration. Additionally, management believes excluding these transactions from these metrics enhances
comparability for peer comparison purposes. See Table 20 in the section of this Item 7 titled "Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality"
for details on the calculation of this measure.
Although intended to enhance investors' understanding of the Company's business and performance, these non-GAAP financial
measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. See the following reconciliations for details on the calculation of these
measures to the extent presented herein.
69
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Years Ended December 31,
Earnings Per Share
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
98,387
$
92,349
$
82,064
$
69,306
$
Net income applicable to non-vested restricted shares . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to net income:
DTA revaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Losses from securities portfolio actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of losses from securities portfolio actions. . . . . .
Special bonus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of special bonus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charitable contribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of charitable contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition and integration related expenses. . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of acquisition and integration related expenses. .
Lease cancellation fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of lease cancellation fee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on sale-leaseback transaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of net gain on sale-leaseback transaction . . . . . .
Property valuation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of property valuation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of an equity investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of gain on sale of an equity investment. . . . . . . .
Losses on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of losses on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . .
Gain on termination of FHLB commitments . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of gain on termination of FHLB commitments . .
Adjusted amortization of FDIC indemnification asset. . . . .
Tax effect of adjusted amortization of FDIC
indemnification asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOLI modification loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total adjustments to net income, net of tax. . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares, adjusted (1). .
(916)
97,471
23,709
2,160
(885)
1,915
(785)
1,600
(656)
20,123
(8,053)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,043)
91,306
(882)
81,182
(836)
68,470
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14,352
(5,741)
950
(380)
(5,509)
2,204
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,389
(556)
—
—
—
—
8,581
(3,432)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
13,872
(5,549)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
39,128
5,876
5,982
8,323
79,306
(1,107)
78,199
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(34,042)
13,617
1,034
(414)
(7,829)
3,132
1,500
(600)
13,312
(10,290)
$
136,599
$
97,182
$
87,164
$
76,793
$
67,909
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic) . . . . .
101,423
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20
Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding . . . .
101,443
Basic EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted EPS, adjusted (1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on Average Assets
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total adjustments to net income, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
0.96
0.96
1.35
98,387
39,128
137,515
$
$
$
$
$
Note: Non-GAAP Reconciliation footnotes are located at the end of this section.
70
$ 13,978,693
$ 10,934,240
0.70%
0.98%
0.84%
0.90%
79,797
13
79,810
1.14
1.14
1.22
92,349
5,876
98,225
77,059
13
77,072
1.05
1.05
1.13
82,064
5,982
88,046
9,702,051
0.85%
0.91%
74,484
12
74,496
0.92
0.92
1.03
69,306
8,323
77,629
8,677,712
0.80%
0.89%
73,984
10
73,994
1.06
1.06
0.92
79,306
(10,290)
69,016
8,278,439
0.96%
0.83%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Return on Average Common and Tangible Common Equity
Net income applicable to common shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangibles amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of intangibles amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares, excluding
intangibles amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total adjustments to net income, net of tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares, excluding
intangibles amortization, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: average intangible assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average tangible common equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average common equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average common equity, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average tangible common equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average tangible common equity, adjusted (1) . . . . . .
Efficiency Ratio Calculation
Noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less:
Net OREO expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special bonus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charitable contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition and integration related expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease cancellation fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property valuation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent net interest income (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fee-based revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Add:
Other income, excluding BOLI income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net trading gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOLI income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-equivalent adjustment of BOLI income . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Efficiency ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective Tax Rate
Income before income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DTA revaluations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense, excluding revaluations of DTAs . . . . . .
Effective income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective income tax rate, excluding revaluations of DTAs. . . .
Divided Payout Ratio
Common dividends declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EPS, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend payout ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend payout ratio, adjusted (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2017
97,471
7,865
(3,183)
102,153
39,128
141,281
1,832,880
(751,292)
1,081,588
5.32%
7.45%
9.44%
13.06%
Years Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
$
$
$
91,306
4,682
(1,873)
94,115
5,876
99,991
1,236,606
(363,112)
873,494
7.38%
7.86%
10.77%
11.45%
$
$
$
$
$
81,182
3,920
(1,568)
83,534
5,982
89,516
1,132,058
(332,269)
799,789
7.17%
7.70%
10.44%
11.19%
$
$
$
$
$
68,470
2,888
(1,155)
70,203
8,323
78,526
1,043,566
(290,303)
753,263
6.56%
7.36%
9.32%
10.42%
2013
78,199
3,278
(1,311)
80,166
(10,290)
69,876
972,283
(279,021)
693,262
8.04%
6.98%
11.56%
10.08%
$
415,909
$
339,500
$
307,216
$
283,826
$
256,737
(4,683)
(1,915)
(1,600)
(20,123)
—
—
387,588
479,965
155,166
3,913
—
5,946
3,964
648,954
59.73%
187,954
89,567
(23,709)
65,858
47.65%
35.04%
0.39
0.96
1.35
40.63%
28.89%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(3,024)
—
—
(14,352)
(950)
—
321,174
358,334
145,101
3,635
—
3,647
2,431
513,148
62.59%
138,520
46,171
—
46,171
33.33%
33.33%
0.36
1.14
1.22
31.58%
29.51%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(5,281)
—
—
(1,389)
—
(8,581)
291,965
322,277
127,259
2,764
—
4,185
2,790
459,275
63.57%
119,811
37,747
—
37,747
31.51%
31.51%
0.36
1.05
1.13
34.17%
31.86%
2017
(7,075)
—
—
(13,872)
—
—
262,879
288,589
111,081
2,672
—
2,873
1,915
407,130
64.57%
100,476
31,170
—
31,170
31.02%
31.02%
0.31
0.92
1.03
33.70%
30.10%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(8,547)
—
—
—
—
—
248,190
272,429
106,282
2,297
3,189
1,468
979
386,644
64.19%
128,021
48,715
—
48,715
38.05%
38.05%
0.16
1.06
0.92
15.14%
17.39%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2016
1,864,874
(754,757)
1,110,117
33,036
1,143,153
14,077,052
(754,757)
13,322,295
11,920,372
$
$
$
$
$
8.33%
8.58%
9.31%
1,257,080
(366,876)
890,204
40,910
931,114
11,422,555
(366,876)
11,055,679
10,019,434
8.05%
8.42%
8.88%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Tangible Common Equity
Stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity, excluding AOCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-weighted assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity to tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity, excluding AOCI, to tangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note: Non-GAAP Reconciliation footnotes are located at the end of this section.
71
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Fourth
Third
Second
First
2017
2016
Quarterly Performance
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,347
$
38,235
$
34,950
$
22,855
$
20,718
$
28,402
$
25,267
$
17,962
Net income applicable to
non-vested restricted shares
Net income applicable
to common shares . . . . . .
Adjustments to net
income:
(6)
(340)
(336)
(234)
(217)
(324)
(290)
(212)
2,341
37,895
34,614
22,621
20,501
28,078
24,977
17,750
DTA revaluation . . . . . . . .
26,555
(2,846)
5,357
(3,197)
Losses (gains) from
securities portfolio
actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of losses (gains)
from securities portfolio
actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special bonus. . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of special bonus
Charitable contribution . . .
Tax effect of charitable
contribution . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition and
integration related
expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of acquisition
and integration related
expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease cancellation fee . . . .
Tax effect of lease
cancellation fee . . . . . . . .
Net gain on sale-leaseback
transaction . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of net gain on
sale-leaseback
transaction . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total adjustments to net
income, net of tax. . . . .
Net income applicable
to common
shareholders,
adjusted. . . . . . . . . . .
(2,196)
1,915
(785)
1,600
(656)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,311
—
—
—
—
384
1,174
18,565
7,542
1,172
618
5,020
(157)
(470)
(7,426)
(3,017)
(469)
(247)
(2,008)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
950
(380)
—
—
—
—
(5,509)
2,204
(2,602)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
371
3,012
31,790
(4,505)
704
11,139
5,095
$
34,131
$
33,390
$
35,318
$
33,760
$
25,596
$
25,476
$
25,348
$
20,762
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Weighted-average
common shares
outstanding (basic) . . . . .
Dilutive effect of
common stock
equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average
diluted common
shares outstanding . . . .
101,766
101,752
101,743
100,411
80,415
80,396
80,383
77,980
15
13
13
12
15
13
13
12
101,787
101,772
101,763
100,432
80,430
80,409
80,396
77,992
Average stockholders' equity
$
1,880,265
$
1,855,647
$
1,830,536
$
1,763,538
$
1,269,993
$
1,261,702
$
1,235,497
$
1,178,588
Average assets. . . . . . . . . . . .
14,118,625
14,155,766
13,960,843
13,673,125
11,380,108
11,322,325
10,968,516
10,056,845
Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted EPS, adjusted (1) . . . .
$
$
0.02
0.34
$
$
0.37
0.33
$
$
0.34
0.35
$
$
0.23
0.34
$
$
0.25
0.32
$
$
0.35
0.32
$
$
0.31
0.32
$
$
Return on average common
equity (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average common
equity, adjusted (1)(3) . . . . . .
Return on average assets (3). .
Return on average assets,
adjusted (1)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.49 %
7.20 %
0.07 %
0.96 %
8.10 %
7.14 %
1.07 %
0.95 %
7.58 %
7.74 %
1.00 %
1.02 %
5.20 %
7.76 %
0.68 %
1.01 %
6.42 %
8.02 %
0.72 %
0.90 %
8.85 %
8.03 %
1.00 %
0.91 %
8.13 %
8.25 %
0.93 %
0.94 %
0.23
0.27
6.06 %
7.09 %
0.72 %
0.84 %
(1)
(2)
(3)
Adjustments to net income for the fourth and third quarters of 2017 include revaluation of DTAs related to federal income tax reform and changes in Illinois income tax
rates, a special colleague bonus, additional charitable contribution, and certain actions related to the securities portfolio. In addition, net income for certain periods was
adjusted for acquisition and integration related expenses associated with completed and pending acquisitions, a lease cancellation fee recognized as a result of the
Company's planned 2018 corporate headquarters relocation, a net gain on a sale-leaseback transaction, property valuation adjustments, a gain on the sale of an equity
investment, losses on early extinguishment of debt, gain on the termination of FHLB commitments, adjusted amortization of the FDIC indemnification asset, and a BOLI
modification loss.
Presented on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%.
Annualized based on the actual number of days for each period presented.
72
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The disclosures in this item are qualified by Item 1A "Risk Factors" and the section captioned "Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements" in Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations," of this report, and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this report.
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest
rates, exchange rates, and equity prices. Interest rate risk is our primary market risk and is the result of repricing, basis, and option
risk. Repricing risk represents timing mismatches in our ability to alter contractual rates earned on interest-earning assets or paid
on interest-bearing liabilities in response to changes in market interest rates. Basis risk refers to the potential for changes in the
underlying relationship between market rates or indices, which subsequently result in a narrowing of the spread between the rate
earned on a loan or investment and the rate paid to fund that investment. Option risk arises from the "embedded options" present
in many financial instruments, such as loan prepayment options or deposit early withdrawal options. These provide customers
opportunities to take advantage of directional changes in interest rates and could have an adverse impact on our margin performance.
We seek to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and net income while managing volatility that arises from shifts in
interest rates. The Bank's Asset Liability Committee ("ALCO") oversees financial risk management by developing programs to
measure and manage interest rate risks within authorized limits set by the Bank's Board of Directors. ALCO also approves the
Bank's asset and liability management policies, oversees the formulation and implementation of strategies to improve balance
sheet positioning and earnings, and reviews the Bank's interest rate sensitivity position. Management uses net interest income
simulation modeling to analyze and capture exposure of earnings to changes in interest rates.
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
The analysis of net interest income sensitivity assesses the magnitude of changes in net interest income over a twelve-month
measurement period resulting from immediate changes in interest rates using multiple rate scenarios. These scenarios include, but
are not limited to, a flat or unchanged rate environment, immediate increases of 100, 200, and 300 basis points, and an immediate
decrease of 100 basis points. Due to the low interest rate environment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, management determined
that an immediate decrease in interest rates greater than 100 basis points was not meaningful for this analysis.
This simulation analysis is based on expected future cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet and off-balance
sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment
rates of certain assets and liabilities. In addition, this sensitivity analysis examines assets and liabilities at the beginning of the
measurement period and does not assume any changes from growth or business plans over the next twelve months. Interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities are assumed to re-price based on contractual terms over the twelve-month measurement
period assuming an instantaneous parallel shift in interest rates in effect at the beginning of the measurement period. The simulation
analysis also incorporates assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates in relation to interest rates. Because these
assumptions are inherently uncertain, the simulation analysis cannot definitively measure net interest income or predict the impact
of the fluctuation in interest rates on net interest income, but does provide an indication of the Company's sensitivity to changes
in interest rates. Actual results may differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate
changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.
The Company's current simulation analysis indicates we would benefit from rising interest rates. Interest-earning assets consist
of short and long-term products. Excluding non-accrual loans, and including the impact of hedging certain corporate variable rate
loans using interest rate swaps through which the Company receives fixed amounts and pays variable amounts, 49% of the loan
portfolio consisted of fixed rate loans and 51% were floating rate loans as of December 31, 2017, compared to 48% and 52%,
respectively, as of December 31, 2016. See Note 19 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-
K for additional detail regarding interest rate swaps.
As of December 31, 2017, investments, consisting of securities and interest-bearing deposits in other banks, are more heavily
weighted toward fixed rate securities at 93% of the total compared to 7% for floating rate interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
This compares to investments comprising 95% of fixed rate securities and 5% of floating rate interest-bearing deposits in other
banks as of December 31, 2016. Fixed rate loans are most sensitive to the 3-5 year portion of the yield curve and the Company
limits its loans with maturities that extend beyond 5 years. The majority of floating rate loans are indexed to the short-term Prime
or LIBOR rates. The amount of floating rate loans with active interest rate floors was $60.0 million, or 1%, of the floating rate
loan portfolio as of December 31, 2017 compared to $271.5 million, or 5%, of the floating rate loan portfolio as of December 31,
2016. On the liability side of the balance sheet, 86% of average deposits as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, are demand deposits
or interest-bearing core deposits, which either do not pay interest or the interest rates are expected to rise at a slower pace than
short-term interest rates.
73
Analysis of Net Interest Income Sensitivity
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Immediate Change in Rates
+300
+200
+100
-100
As of December 31, 2017
Dollar change. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percent change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2016
Dollar change. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percent change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
70,999
$
44,733
$
33,099
$
(44,579)
14.8%
9.3%
6.9%
(9.3)%
44,092
$
25,412
$
12,763
$
(26,013)
12.3%
7.1%
3.6%
(7.2)%
The sensitivity of estimated net interest income to an instantaneous parallel shift in interest rates is reflected as both dollar and
percentage changes. This table illustrates that an instantaneous 200 basis point rise in interest rates as of December 31, 2017 would
increase net interest income by $44.7 million, or 9.3%, over the next twelve months compared to no change in interest rates. This
same measure was $25.4 million, or 7.1%, as of December 31, 2016.
Overall, positive interest rate risk volatility as of December 31, 2017 increased compared to December 31, 2016. This increase
was driven primarily by a reduction in short-term FHLB advances, resulting from the sale of securities acquired in the Standard
transaction. In addition, continued growth in floating rate loans funded with both core and time deposits contributed to the increase.
74
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements
To Our Stockholders:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") were prepared by
management, which is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the data presented. In the opinion of management, the financial
statements, which necessarily include amounts based on management's estimates and judgments, have been prepared in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited these consolidated financial statements in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and has expressed its unqualified
opinion on these financial statements.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which oversees the Company's financial reporting process on behalf of the Board
of Directors, is composed entirely of independent directors (as defined by the listing standards of NASDAQ). The Audit Committee
meets periodically with management, the Company's independent accountants, and the Company's internal auditors to review
matters relating to the Company's financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to financial
reporting and disclosure, annual financial statement audit, engagement of independent accountants, internal audit function, and
system of internal controls. The internal auditors and the independent accountants periodically meet alone with the Audit Committee
and have access to the Audit Committee at any time.
/s/ MICHAEL L. SCUDDER
Michael L. Scudder
Chairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2018
/s/ PATRICK S. BARRETT
Patrick S. Barrett
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
75
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
We have also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013
framework) and our report dated February 28, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1996.
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2018
76
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading securities, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2017 – $12,013; 2016 – $18,212) .
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") and Federal Reserve Bank ("FRB") stock, at cost . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other real estate owned ("OREO") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises, furniture, and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill and other intangible assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
$
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, at cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
As of December 31,
2017
2016
192,800
153,770
20,447
1,884,209
13,760
69,708
10,437,812
(95,729)
10,342,083
20,851
123,316
279,900
754,757
221,451
14,077,052
3,576,190
7,477,135
11,053,325
714,884
195,170
248,799
12,212,178
1,123
1,031,870
1,074,990
(33,036)
(210,073)
1,864,874
14,077,052
$
$
$
$
155,055
107,093
17,920
1,919,450
22,291
59,131
8,254,145
(86,083)
8,168,062
26,083
82,577
219,746
366,876
278,271
11,422,555
2,766,748
6,061,855
8,828,603
879,008
194,603
263,261
10,165,475
913
498,937
1,016,674
(40,910)
(218,534)
1,257,080
11,422,555
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Preferred
Shares
Common
Shares
Preferred
Shares
Common
Shares
Par value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Shares authorized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares issued. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— $
1,000
—
—
—
0.01
250,000
112,351
102,717
9,634
$
— $
1,000
—
—
—
0.01
150,000
91,284
81,325
9,959
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
77
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Interest Income
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Investment securities – taxable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities – tax-exempt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest Expense
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income after provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposit accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wealth management fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Card-based fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Merchant servicing fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital market products income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage banking income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other service charges, commissions, and fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOLI income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities (losses) gains. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on sale-leaseback transaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total noninterest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and wages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retirement and other employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net occupancy and equipment expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Technology and related costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") premiums . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising and promotions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Merchant card expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cardholder expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net OREO expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition and integration related expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease cancellation fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property valuation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Per Common Share Data
Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
78
$
$
$
463,331
35,569
6,296
4,520
509,716
16,184
9,100
12,428
37,712
472,004
31,290
440,714
48,368
41,321
28,992
10,340
8,171
8,131
9,843
5,946
(1,876)
3,913
—
163,149
182,507
41,886
49,751
33,689
18,068
8,987
8,694
8,377
7,323
4,683
31,821
20,123
—
—
415,909
187,954
89,567
98,387
0.96
0.96
101,423
101,443
$
$
$
337,998
28,724
8,737
2,873
378,332
9,863
6,313
12,465
28,641
349,691
30,983
318,708
40,665
33,071
29,104
12,533
10,024
10,162
9,542
3,647
1,420
3,635
5,509
159,312
151,341
33,309
41,154
25,122
14,765
6,268
7,787
10,782
5,812
3,024
24,834
14,352
950
—
339,500
138,520
46,171
92,349
1.14
1.14
79,797
79,810
300,303
18,082
13,861
3,738
335,984
9,527
2,314
12,545
24,386
311,598
21,152
290,446
39,979
29,162
26,984
11,739
4,806
5,741
8,848
4,185
2,373
2,764
—
136,581
133,739
31,852
38,720
22,720
14,581
6,017
7,606
9,886
5,243
5,281
21,601
1,389
—
8,581
307,216
119,811
37,747
82,064
1.05
1.05
77,059
77,072
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
98,387
$
92,349
$
82,064
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Securities Available-for-Sale
Unrealized holding gains (losses):
Before tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification of net (losses) gains included in net income:
Before tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative Instruments
Unrealized holding (losses) gains:
Before tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized Net Pension Costs
Net unrealized holding gains (losses)
12,641
(5,077)
7,564
(1,876)
771
(1,105)
8,669
(4,333)
1,746
(2,587)
(19,204)
7,682
(11,522)
1,420
(568)
852
(12,374)
2,175
(883)
1,292
Before tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2,988
(1,196)
1,792
7,874
106,261
$
(2,002)
563
(1,439)
(12,521)
79,828
$
(9,824)
3,906
(5,918)
2,373
(970)
1,403
(7,321)
(2,233)
903
(1,330)
(6,570)
2,687
(3,883)
(12,534)
69,530
Accumulated
Unrealized
Loss on
Securities
Available-
for-Sale
Accumulated
Unrealized
Loss on
Derivative
Instruments
Unrecognized
Net Pension
Costs
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Balance at December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(2,950) $
(1,138) $
(11,767) $
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7,321)
(10,271)
(12,374)
(22,645)
8,669
(1,330)
(2,468)
1,292
(1,176)
(2,587)
(3,883)
(15,650)
(1,439)
(17,089)
1,792
(15,855)
(12,534)
(28,389)
(12,521)
(40,910)
7,874
Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(13,976) $
(3,763) $
(15,297) $
(33,036)
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
79
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Common
Shares
Outstanding
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Treasury
Stock
Total
Balance at December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77,695
$
882
$ 449,798
$ 899,516
$
(15,855) $ (233,566) $ 1,100,775
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common dividends declared
($0.36 per common share). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of treasury stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock issued to benefit plans. . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
(7)
267
(3)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(10,236)
(132)
7,242
82,064
—
(28,064)
—
—
—
—
—
(12,534)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(120)
6,940
333
—
82,064
(12,534)
(28,064)
(120)
(3,296)
201
7,242
Balance at December 31, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77,952
882
446,672
953,516
(28,389)
(226,413)
1,146,268
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common dividends declared
($0.36 per common share). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
Acquisition, net of issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,042
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock issued to benefit plans. . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
326
(8)
—
—
—
—
31
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
92,349
—
(29,191)
54,865
227
(10,685)
(21)
7,879
—
—
—
—
—
—
(12,521)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,012
(133)
—
92,349
(12,521)
(29,191)
54,896
227
(2,673)
(154)
7,879
Balance at December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81,325
913
498,937
1,016,674
(40,910)
(218,534)
1,257,080
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common dividends declared
($0.39 per common share). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
98,387
—
(40,071)
Acquisitions, net of issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21,078
210
533,322
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock issued to benefit plans. . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
317
(12)
—
—
—
—
—
240
(11,855)
3
11,223
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,874
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
558
—
8,196
(293)
98,387
7,874
(40,071)
534,090
240
(3,659)
(290)
—
11,223
Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
102,717
$
1,123
$ 1,031,870
$ 1,074,990
$
(33,036) $ (210,073) $ 1,864,874
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
80
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
98,387
$
92,349
$
82,064
31,290
13,995
16,142
1,876
(7,078)
585
1,208
(125)
(5,946)
981
11,223
349
(4,077)
7,865
(254,030)
258,626
(2,527)
121,577
(55,762)
234,559
349,444
629,843
(733,440)
8,546
(15)
(7,330)
(457,501)
1,722
19,326
18,031
(16,123)
41,717
(145,780)
200,848
(164,124)
—
—
—
(37,129)
(3,952)
(4,357)
84,422
262,148
346,570
30,983
12,804
13,653
(1,420)
(8,931)
1,196
1,185
(4,762)
(3,647)
(513)
7,879
(197)
(1,367)
4,682
(238,192)
246,642
(1,026)
(76,902)
47,118
121,534
360,303
53,186
(933,317)
8,077
(5,352)
(18,276)
(714,213)
1,588
7,539
152,863
(19,083)
57,347
(1,049,338)
135,944
711,496
—
146,484
(153,500)
(29,198)
(2,476)
808,750
(119,054)
381,202
262,148
$
$
21,152
13,367
4,849
(2,373)
(6,847)
2,631
1,461
7,718
(4,185)
622
7,242
(406)
16,897
3,920
(158,699)
158,791
566
10,023
(1,042)
157,751
322,764
93,909
(509,481)
4,645
(1,242)
(1,190)
(399,807)
1,082
18,572
1,230
(11,269)
(16,047)
(496,834)
118,167
25,902
(120)
—
—
(27,036)
(2,890)
114,023
(225,060)
606,262
381,202
Operating Activities
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of premises, furniture, and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net amortization of premium on securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities losses (gains) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gains on sales of 1-4 family mortgages and corporate loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . .
Net losses on sales and valuation adjustments of OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of the FDIC indemnification asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (gains) losses on sales and valuation adjustments of premises, furniture,
and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOLI income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net pension cost (income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) related to share-based compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for deferred income tax (benefit) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Originations of mortgage loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (increase) decrease in trading securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (decrease) increase in accrued interest payables and other liabilities . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities, repayments, and calls of securities available-for-sale . . .
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from maturities, repayments, and calls of securities held-to-maturity . . . .
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of FHLB stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from claims on BOLI, net of premiums paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of premises, furniture, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of premises, furniture, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash received from (paid for) acquisitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing Activities
Net increase in deposit accounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (decrease) increase in borrowed funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for the retirement of senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
81
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
15,191
$
57,553
$
Interest paid to depositors and creditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared, but unpaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued for acquisitions, net of issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash transfers of loans to OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash transfers of loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . .
36,424
10,185
534,090
6,255
48,999
27,400
7,243
54,896
4,173
93,981
25,022
24,535
7,250
—
13,504
57,130
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
82
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations – First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") is a bank holding company that was incorporated in
Delaware in 1982 and began operations on March 31, 1983. The Company is headquartered in Itasca, Illinois and has operations
located primarily throughout the Chicago metropolitan area, as well as northwest Indiana, central and western Illinois, and eastern
Iowa. The Company operates three wholly-owned subsidiaries: First Midwest Bank (the "Bank"), Catalyst Asset Holdings, LLC
("Catalyst"), and Premier Asset Management LLC ("Premier"). The Bank conducts the majority of the Company's operations,
Catalyst manages certain non-performing assets of the Company, and Premier is a registered investment advisor providing advisory
services to certain of the Company's wealth management clients.
The Company is engaged in commercial and retail banking and offers a broad range of banking, treasury management, and wealth
management products and services, tailored to the needs of its commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, municipal, and
consumer customers.
Basis of Presentation – The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and general practices within the banking industry. The Company uses the accrual basis
of accounting for financial reporting purposes. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year amounts to conform to the current
year presentation.
Use of Estimates – The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Although these estimates and assumptions are based on the best available information, actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Principles of Consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of
operations of the Company and its subsidiaries after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Assets
held in a fiduciary or agency capacity are not assets of the Company or its subsidiaries and are not included in the consolidated
financial statements.
Segment Disclosures – The Company has one reportable segment. The Company's chief operating decision maker evaluates the
operations of the Company using consolidated information for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.
Therefore, segment disclosures are not required.
The following is a summary of the Company's significant accounting policies.
Business Combinations – Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Assets acquired
and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition, with any excess of the purchase
price of the acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired recorded as goodwill.
Alternatively, a gain is recorded if the fair value of assets purchased exceeds the fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration
paid. The results of operations of the acquired business are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income from the effective
date of the acquisition.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, management defines cash and cash
equivalents to include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, and other short-term investments, if any,
such as federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell.
Securities – Securities are classified as held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale at the time of purchase.
Securities Held-to-Maturity – Securities classified as held-to-maturity are securities for which management has the intent and
ability to hold to maturity. These securities are stated at cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
over the estimated lives of the securities using the effective interest method.
Trading Securities – The Company's trading securities consist of diversified investment securities held in a grantor trust under
deferred compensation arrangements in which plan participants may direct amounts earned to be invested in securities other than
Company stock. The accounts of the grantor trust are consolidated with the accounts of the Company in its consolidated financial
statements. Trading securities are reported at fair value. Other than the securities held in the grantor trust, the Company does not
carry any securities for trading purposes.
83
Securities Available-for-Sale – All other securities are classified as available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale are carried at
fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of related deferred income taxes, recorded in stockholders' equity as a separate
component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
The historical cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the estimated life
of the security using the effective interest method. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are included in interest
income.
Purchases and sales of securities are recognized on a trade date basis. Realized securities gains or losses are reported in net securities
(losses) gains in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
On a quarterly basis, the Company individually assesses securities with unrealized losses to determine whether there were any
events or circumstances indicating that an other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") has occurred. In evaluating OTTI, the
Company considers many factors, including (i) the severity and duration of the impairment, (ii) the financial condition and near-
term prospects of the issuer, including external credit ratings and recent downgrades for debt securities, (iii) its intent to hold the
security until its value recovers, and (iv) the likelihood that it will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value, which
may be at maturity. If management intends to sell the security or believes it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell
the security prior to full recovery, an OTTI charge will be recognized through income as a realized loss and included in net securities
(losses) gains in the Consolidated Statements of Income. If management does not expect to sell the security or believes it is not
more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to full recovery, the OTTI is separated into the amount related
to credit deterioration, which is recognized through income as a realized loss, and the amount resulting from other factors, which
is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
FHLB and FRB Stock – The Company, as a member of the FHLB and FRB, is required to maintain an investment in the capital
stock of the FHLB and FRB. No ready market exists for these stocks, and they have no quoted market values. The stock is
redeemable at par by the FHLB and FRB and is, therefore, carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment.
Loans – Loans held-for-investment are loans that the Company intends to hold until they are paid in full and are carried at the
principal amount outstanding, including certain net deferred loan origination fees. Loan origination fees, commitment fees, and
certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net amount is amortized as a yield adjustment over the contractual life
of the related loans or commitments and included in interest income. Fees related to letters of credit are amortized into fee income
over the contractual life of the commitment. Other credit-related fees are recognized as fee income when earned. The Company's
net investment in direct financing leases is included in loans and consists of future minimum lease payments and estimated residual
values, net of unearned income. Interest income on loans is accrued based on principal amounts outstanding. Loans held-for-sale
are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value and included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition.
Acquired and Covered Loans – Covered loans consist of loans acquired by the Company in FDIC-assisted transactions, which
are covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC (the "FDIC Agreements"), under which the FDIC reimburses the Company
for the majority of the losses and eligible expenses related to these assets during the coverage period. Acquired loans consist of
all other loans that were acquired in business combinations that are not covered by the FDIC Agreements. Certain loans that were
previously classified as covered loans are no longer covered under the FDIC Agreements, and are included in acquired loans.
Covered loans and acquired loans are included within loans held-for-investment.
Acquired and covered loans are separated into (i) non-purchased credit impaired ("non-PCI") and (ii) purchased credit impaired
("PCI") loans. Non-PCI loans include loans that did not have evidence of credit deterioration since origination at the acquisition
date. PCI loans include loans that had evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it was probable at acquisition
that the Company would not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Evidence of credit deterioration
was evaluated using various indicators, such as past due and non-accrual status. Leases and revolving loans do not qualify to be
accounted for as PCI loans and are accounted for as non-PCI loans.
The acquisition adjustment related to non-PCI loans is amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the related loans.
If an acquired non-PCI loan is renewed subsequent to the acquisition date, any remaining acquisition adjustment is accreted into
interest income and the loan is considered a new loan that is no longer classified as an acquired loan.
PCI loans are accounted for based on estimates of expected future cash flows. To estimate the fair value, the Company generally
aggregates purchased consumer loans and commercial loans into pools of loans with common risk characteristics, such as
delinquency status, credit score, and internal risk ratings. The fair values of larger balance commercial loans are estimated on an
individual basis. Expected future cash flows in excess of the fair value of loans at the purchase date ("accretable yield") are recorded
as interest income over the life of the loans if the timing and amount of the expected future cash flows can be reasonably estimated.
The non-accretable yield represents the difference between contractually required payments and the expected future cash flows
determined at acquisition. Subsequent increases in expected future cash flows are offset against the allowance for credit losses to
84
the extent an allowance has been established or otherwise recognized as interest income prospectively. The present value of any
decreases in expected future cash flows is recognized by recording a charge-off through the allowance for loan losses or providing
an allowance for loan losses.
90-Days Past Due Loans – The Company's accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days
past due unless the credit is sufficiently collateralized and in the process of renewal or collection.
Non-accrual Loans – Generally, corporate loans are placed on non-accrual status (i) when either principal or interest payments
become 90 days or more past due unless the credit is sufficiently collateralized and in the process of renewal or collection or (ii)
when an individual analysis of a borrower's creditworthiness warrants a downgrade to non-accrual regardless of past due status.
When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed, and unpaid interest
accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. After the loan is placed on non-accrual status, all debt
service payments are applied to the principal on the loan. Future interest income may only be recorded on a cash basis after recovery
of principal is reasonably assured. Non-accrual loans are returned to accrual status when the financial position of the borrower
and other relevant factors indicate that the Company will collect all principal and interest.
Commercial loans and loans secured by real estate are charged-off when deemed uncollectible. A loss is recorded if the net realizable
value of the underlying collateral is less than the outstanding principal and interest. Consumer loans that are not secured by real
estate are subject to mandatory charge-off at a specified delinquency date and are usually not classified as non-accrual prior to
being charged-off. Closed-end consumer loans, which include installment, automobile, and single payment loans, are usually
charged-off no later than the end of the month in which the loan becomes 120 days past due.
PCI loans are generally considered accruing loans unless reasonable estimates of the timing and amount of expected future cash
flows cannot be determined. Loans without reasonable future cash flow estimates are classified as non-accrual loans, and interest
income is not recognized on those loans until the timing and amount of the expected future cash flows can be reasonably determined.
Troubled Debt Restructurings ("TDRs") – A restructuring is considered a TDR when (i) the borrower is experiencing financial
difficulties, and (ii) the creditor grants a concession, such as forgiveness of principal, reduction of the interest rate, changes in
payments, or extension of the maturity date. Loans are not classified as TDRs when the modification is short-term or results in an
insignificant delay in payments. The Company's TDRs are determined on a case-by-case basis.
The Company does not accrue interest on a TDR unless it believes collection of all principal and interest under the modified terms
is reasonably assured. For a TDR to begin accruing interest, the borrower must demonstrate some level of past performance and
the future capacity to perform under the modified terms. Generally, six months of consecutive payment performance under the
restructured terms is required before a TDR is returned to accrual status. However, the period could vary depending on the individual
facts and circumstances of the loan. An evaluation of the borrower's current creditworthiness is used to assess the borrower's
capacity to repay the loan under the modified terms. This evaluation includes an estimate of expected future cash flows, evidence
of strong financial position, and estimates of the value of collateral, if applicable. For TDRs to be removed from TDR status in
the calendar year after the restructuring, the loans must (i) have an interest rate and terms that reflect market conditions at the time
of restructuring, and (ii) be in compliance with the modified terms. If the loan was restructured at below market rates and terms,
it continues to be separately reported as a TDR until it is paid in full or charged-off.
Impaired Loans – Impaired loans consist of corporate non-accrual loans and TDRs. A loan is considered impaired when it is
probable that the Company will not collect all contractual principal and interest. With the exception of accruing TDRs, impaired
loans are classified as non-accrual and are exclusive of smaller homogeneous loans, such as home equity, 1-4 family mortgages,
and installment loans. Impaired loans with balances under a specified threshold are not individually evaluated for impairment.
For all other impaired loans, impairment is measured by comparing the estimated value of the loan to the recorded book value.
The value of collateral-dependent loans is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell. The value of other
loans is measured using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's initial effective interest rate.
Allowance for Credit Losses – The allowance for credit losses is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for
unfunded commitments, and is maintained by management at a level believed adequate to absorb estimated losses inherent in the
existing loan portfolio. Determination of the allowance for credit losses is subjective since it requires significant estimates and
management judgment, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on
pools of homogeneous loans, consideration of current economic trends, and other factors.
Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses, while recoveries of amounts previously
charged-off are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are charged to expense through
the provision for loan losses. The amount of provision depends on a number of factors, including net charge-off levels, loan growth,
changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, and the Company's assessment of the allowance for loan losses based on the
methodology discussed below.
85
Allowance for Loan Losses – The allowance for loan losses consists of (i) specific reserves for individual loans where the recorded
investment exceeds the value, (ii) an allowance based on a loss migration analysis that uses historical credit loss experience for
each loan category, and (iii) an allowance based on other internal and external qualitative factors.
The specific reserves component of the allowance for loan losses is based on a periodic analysis of impaired loans exceeding a
fixed dollar amount. If the value of an impaired loan is less than the recorded book value, the Company either establishes a valuation
allowance (i.e., a specific reserve) equal to the excess of the book value over the collateral value of the loan as a component of
the allowance for loan losses or charges off the amount if it is a confirmed loss.
The general reserve component is based on a loss migration analysis, which examines actual loss experience by loan category for
a rolling 8-quarter period and the related internal risk rating for corporate loans. The loss migration analysis is updated quarterly
primarily using actual loss experience. This component is then adjusted based on management's consideration of many internal
and external qualitative factors, including:
• Changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, trends in the volume of loans, and trends in delinquent and non-accrual
loans that could indicate that historical trends do not reflect current conditions.
• Changes in credit policies and procedures, such as underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery
practices.
• Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of credit management and other relevant staff.
• Changes in the quality of the Company's loan review system and Board of Directors oversight.
• The effect of any concentration of credit and changes in the level of concentrations, such as loan type or risk rating.
• Changes in the value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans.
• Changes in the national and local economy that affect the collectability of various segments of the portfolio.
• The effect of other external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements, on the Company's loan
portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses also consists of an allowance on acquired and covered non-PCI and PCI loans. No allowance for
loan losses is recorded on acquired loans at the acquisition date. Subsequent to the acquisition date, an allowance for credit losses
is established as necessary to reflect credit deterioration. The acquired non-PCI allowance is based on management's evaluation
of the acquired non-PCI loan portfolio giving consideration to the current portfolio balance including the remaining acquisition
adjustments, maturity dates, and overall credit quality. The allowance for covered non-PCI loans is calculated in the same manner
as the general reserve component based on a loss migration analysis as discussed above. The acquired and covered PCI allowance
reflects the difference between the carrying value and the discounted expected future cash flows of the acquired and covered PCI
loans. On a periodic basis, the adequacy of this allowance is determined through a re-estimation of expected future cash flows on
all of the outstanding acquired and covered PCI loans using either a probability of default/loss given default ("PD/LGD")
methodology or a specific review methodology. The PD/LGD model is a loss model that estimates expected future cash flows
using a probability of default curve and loss given default estimates. Acquired non-PCI loans that have renewed subsequent to the
respective acquisition dates are no longer classified as acquired loans. Instead, they are included in the general loan population
and allocated an allowance based on a loss migration analysis.
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments – The Company also maintains a reserve for unfunded commitments, including letters of
credit, for the risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The reserve for unfunded commitments is estimated using the loss
migration analysis from the allowance for loan losses, adjusted for probabilities of future funding requirements. The reserve for
unfunded commitments is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The establishment of the allowance for credit losses involves a high degree of judgment given the difficulty of assessing the factors
impacting loan repayment and estimating the timing and amount of losses. While management utilizes its best judgment and
information available, the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses depends on a variety of factors beyond the Company's
control, including the performance of its loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and property values, and the
interpretation of loan risk classifications by regulatory authorities.
OREO – OREO consists of properties acquired through foreclosure in partial or total satisfaction of defaulted loans. At initial
transfer into OREO, properties are recorded at fair value, less estimated selling costs. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower
of the cost basis or fair value, less estimated selling costs. OREO write-downs occurring at the transfer date are charged against
the allowance for loan losses, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to the initial transfer, the carrying values of OREO may
be adjusted through a valuation allowance to reflect reductions in value resulting from new appraisals, new list prices, changes in
market conditions, or changes in disposition strategies. Increases in value can be recognized through a reduction in the valuation
allowance, but may not exceed the established cost basis. These valuation adjustments, along with expenses related to maintenance
of the properties, are included in net OREO expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
86
FDIC Indemnification Asset – The majority of loans and OREO acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions are covered by the
FDIC Agreements, under which the FDIC reimburses the Company for the majority of the losses and eligible expenses related to
these assets during the coverage period. The FDIC indemnification asset represents the present value of expected future
reimbursements from the FDIC. Since the indemnified items are covered loans and covered OREO, which are initially measured
at fair value, the FDIC indemnification asset is also initially measured at fair value by discounting the expected future cash flows
to be received from the FDIC. These expected future cash flows are estimated by multiplying estimated losses on covered PCI
loans and covered OREO by the reimbursement rates in the FDIC Agreements.
The balance of the FDIC indemnification asset is adjusted periodically to reflect changes in expected future cash flows. Decreases
in estimated reimbursements from the FDIC are recorded prospectively through amortization and increases in estimated
reimbursements from the FDIC are recognized by an increase in the carrying value of the indemnification asset. Payments from
the FDIC for reimbursement of losses result in a reduction of the FDIC indemnification asset.
Depreciable Assets – Premises, furniture, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense
is determined by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Useful lives range from 3 to 10 years for
furniture and equipment and 25 to 40 years for premises. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of
the asset or the lease term. Gains on dispositions are included in other noninterest income and losses on dispositions are included
in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses
as incurred, while improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining
life. Certain assets, such as buildings and land, that the Company intends to sell and meet held-for-sale criteria are transferred into
the held-for-sale category at the lower of their fair value, as determined by a current appraisal, or their recorded investment.
Long-lived depreciable assets are evaluated periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment exists when the undiscounted expected future cash flows of a long-lived
asset are less than its carrying value. In that event, the Company recognizes a loss for the difference between the carrying amount
and the estimated fair value of the asset based on a quoted market price, if applicable, or a discounted cash flow analysis. Impairment
losses are recorded in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
BOLI – BOLI represents life insurance policies on the lives of certain Company directors and officers for which the Company is
the sole owner and beneficiary. These policies are recorded as an asset in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at
their cash surrender value ("CSV") or the current amount that could be realized if settled. The change in CSV and insurance
proceeds received are included as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets – Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of the acquisition over the fair
value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired using the acquisition method of accounting. Goodwill is not amortized.
Instead, impairment testing is conducted annually as of October 1 or more often if events or circumstances between annual tests
indicate that there may be impairment.
Impairment testing is performed using either a qualitative or quantitative approach at the reporting unit level. All of the Company's
goodwill is allocated to First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., which is the Company's only applicable reporting unit for purposes of testing
goodwill for impairment. The Company performs impairment testing using a qualitative approach to determine whether it is more-
likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Qualitative factors include, but are not limited
to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market specific conditions and trends, the Company's financial performance, market
capitalization, stock price, and Company-specific events relevant to the assessment. If the assessment of qualitative factors indicates
that it is not more-likely-than-not that an impairment exists, no further testing is performed; otherwise, the Company would proceed
with a quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. In the first step, the Company compares its estimate of the fair value of the
reporting unit, which is based on a discounted cash flow analysis, with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value
of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step is not required.
If necessary, the second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by assigning the value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit, including any other identifiable intangible assets. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount
of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.
Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance, but can be distinguished from goodwill because
of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination
with a related contract, asset, or liability. Identified intangible assets that have a finite useful life are amortized over that life in a
manner that reflects the estimated decline in the economic value of the identified intangible asset. All of the Company's other
intangible assets have finite lives and are amortized over varying periods not exceeding 13 years. Intangible assets are reviewed
for impairment annually or more frequently when events or circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.
87
Wealth Management – Assets held in a fiduciary or agency capacity for customers are not included in the consolidated financial
statements as they are not assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. Fee income is recognized on an accrual basis and is included
as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Derivative Financial Instruments – To provide derivative products to customers and in the ordinary course of business, the
Company enters into derivative transactions as part of its overall interest rate risk management strategy to minimize significant
unplanned fluctuations in earnings and expected future cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. All derivative instruments are
recorded at fair value as either other assets or other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Subsequent
changes in a derivative's fair value are recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
On the date the Company enters into a derivative contract, the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge,
or a non-hedge derivative instrument. Fair value hedges are designed to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset
or liability attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk. Cash flow hedges are designed to mitigate exposure to variability
in expected future cash flows to be received or paid related to an asset, liability, or other type of forecasted transaction. The
Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, including its risk management
objective and strategy at inception.
At the hedge's inception and quarterly thereafter, a formal assessment is performed to determine the effectiveness of the derivative
in offsetting changes in the fair values or expected future cash flows of the hedged items in the current period and prospectively.
If a derivative instrument designated as a hedge is terminated or ceases to be highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued
prospectively, and the gain or loss is amortized into earnings. For fair value hedges, the gain or loss is amortized over the remaining
life of the hedged asset or liability. For cash flow hedges, the gain or loss is amortized over the same period that the forecasted
hedged transactions impact earnings. If the hedged item is disposed of, any fair value adjustments are included in the gain or loss
from the disposition of the hedged item. If the forecasted transaction is no longer probable, the gain or loss is included in earnings
immediately.
For fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments, as well as changes in the fair value of the hedged
item, are recognized in earnings. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instrument
is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and is reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction
is reflected in earnings.
Ineffectiveness is calculated based on the change in fair value of the hedged item compared with the change in fair value of the
hedging instrument. For all types of hedges, any ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship is recognized in earnings during the
period the ineffectiveness occurs.
Comprehensive Income – Comprehensive income is the total of reported net income and other comprehensive income (loss)
which includes all other revenues, expenses, gains, and losses that are not reported in net income under GAAP. The Company
includes the following items, net of tax, in other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income: (i) changes in unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale, (ii) changes in the fair value of derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges, and (iii) changes in unrecognized net pension costs related to the Company's pension plan.
Treasury Stock – Treasury stock acquired is recorded at cost and is carried as a reduction of stockholders' equity in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. Treasury stock issued is valued based on the "last in, first out" inventory method. The difference
between the consideration received on issuance and the carrying value is charged or credited to additional paid-in capital.
Share-Based Compensation – The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense based on the estimated fair value of
the award at the grant or modification date over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange
for such award. Share-based compensation expense is included in salaries and wages in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Income Taxes – The Company files United States ("U.S.") federal income tax returns and state income tax returns in various
states. The provision for income taxes is based on income in the consolidated financial statements, rather than amounts reported
on the Company's income tax return.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in years in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is established for any deferred tax asset for which recovery or
settlement is not more-likely-than-not. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized as
income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
Earnings per Common Share ("EPS") – EPS is computed using the two-class method. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net
income applicable to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period,
88
excluding outstanding participating securities. Participating securities include non-vested restricted stock awards and restricted
stock units, which contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Diluted earnings per common share is
computed using the weighted-average number of shares determined for the basic earnings per common share computation plus
the dilutive effect of stock compensation using the treasury stock method.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments: In March of 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued final guidance clarifying the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment
of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. Entities are required to apply the guidance to
existing debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have a debt host) using a modified retrospective
transition method as of the period of adoption. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2017 did not impact the Company's
financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Equity Method Accounting: In March of 2016, the FASB issued final guidance to simplify the equity method of accounting. The
guidance eliminates the requirement to retrospectively apply equity method accounting in previous periods when an investor
initially obtains significant influence over an investee. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2017 did not impact the
Company's financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Accounting for Employee Share-based Payments: In March of 2016, the FASB issued guidance to simplify the accounting for
employee share-based payment transactions. The guidance requires entities to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the
income statement when the awards vest or are settled. In addition, the guidance allows entities to repurchase more of an employee's
shares than it can under current guidance for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and to make a policy
election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2017 resulted in a $638,000 tax
benefit to the provision for income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, recorded in the Company's results of
operations. The Company elected to estimate forfeitures, which is consistent with the Company's practice before the adoption of
this guidance.
Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption
Revenue from Contracts with Customers: In May of 2014, the FASB issued guidance that requires an entity to recognize revenue
to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In March of 2016, the FASB issued an amendment to this guidance
to clarify the implementation of guidance on principal versus agent consideration. Additional amendments to clarify the
implementation guidance on the identification of performance obligations and licensing were issued in April of 2016 and narrow-
scope improvements and practical expedients were issued in May of 2016. The guidance was initially effective for annual and
interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016 but was deferred to December 15, 2017, and must be applied
either retrospectively or using the modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective
date.
The Company's revenue is comprised of net interest income on financial assets and liabilities, which is excluded from the scope
of this guidance, and noninterest income. The primary sources of revenue within noninterest income are service charges on deposit
accounts, wealth management fees, card-based fees, and merchant servicing fees. Based upon the Company's final assessment,
this guidance will affect the presentation of merchant servicing fees, card-based fees, cardholder expenses, and merchant card
expense that are currently presented on a gross basis within noninterest income and noninterest expense but will now be required
to be presented on a net basis within noninterest income. In addition, qualitative disclosures regarding noninterest income will be
expanded. The Company will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach and does not
expect the changes in presentation of certain contract costs or the expanded disclosures to have a significant impact on the Company's
financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Amendments to Guidance on Classifying and Measuring Financial Instruments: In January of 2016, the FASB issued guidance
that will require entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the
equity method at fair value. Any changes in fair value will be recognized in net income unless the investments qualify for a new
practicability exception. This guidance also requires entities to adjust the fair value disclosures for financial instruments carried
at amortized cost from an entry price to an exit price. No changes were made to the guidance for classifying and measuring
investments in debt securities and loans. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2017. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance will materially impact the Company's
financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
89
Leases: In February of 2016, the FASB issued guidance to increase transparency and comparability across entities for leasing
arrangements. This guidance requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases. For lessors, this guidance modifies
the lease classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. In addition, this guidance clarifies
criteria for the determination of whether a contract is or contains a lease. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted.
During 2016, the Bank entered into a sale-leaseback transaction that resulted in a deferred gain of $82.5 million, with $74.6 million
remaining as of December 31, 2017. Upon adoption of this guidance, the remaining deferred gain will be recognized immediately
as a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity and will no longer be accreted as a reduction to lease expense in net occupancy and
equipment expense. For additional discussion of the sale-leaseback transaction, see note 8 "Premises, Furniture, and Equipment."
Management is evaluating the new guidance and the additional impact to the Company's financial condition, results of operations,
or liquidity.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments: In June of 2016, the FASB issued guidance that will require entities
to present financial assets measured at amortized cost at the net amount expected to be collected, considering an entity's current
estimate of all expected credit losses. In addition, credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will be required to be
recorded through an allowance for credit losses, with changes in credit loss estimates recognized through current earnings. This
guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, but not for
periods beginning before December 15, 2018. Management is evaluating the new guidance and the impact to the Company's
financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments: In August of 2016, the FASB issued guidance clarifying certain
cash flow presentation and classification issues to reduce diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption
of this guidance will materially impact the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Income Taxes: In October of 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences
of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This guidance is effective for annual and
interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of
this guidance will materially impact the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business: In January of 2017, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies the definition of a business
to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.
This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.
Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance will materially impact the Company's financial condition, results of
operations, or liquidity.
Accounting for Goodwill Impairment: In January of 2017, the FASB issued guidance that simplifies the accounting for goodwill
impairment for all entities. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill using the
second step of the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment model prescribed under current accounting guidance. Under the new
guidance, if a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that
difference. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates beginning after December 15,
2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. Management
does not expect the adoption of this guidance will materially impact the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or
liquidity.
Presentation of Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Costs: In March of 2017, the FASB issued guidance that changes how employers
that sponsor defined pension and or other postretirement benefit plans present the net periodic benefit cost in the income statement.
Employers will present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other
employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Other components of net periodic benefit cost will
be presented separately from the line item(s) that includes the service cost. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance will
materially impact the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities: In March of 2017, the FASB issued guidance that shortens the
amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. This guidance is effective
for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the
adoption of this guidance will materially impact the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Share-based Payment Award Modifications: In May of 2017, the FASB issued guidance to reduce diversity in practice by
clarifying when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. This
guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Management
90
does not expect the adoption of this guidance will materially impact the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or
liquidity.
Derivatives and Hedging: In August of 2017, the FASB issued guidance to better align the financial reporting related to hedging
activities with the economic objectives of those activities and to simplify the application of current hedge accounting guidance.
Entities are required to apply the guidance using a modified retrospective method as of the period of adoption. This guidance is
effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating
the new guidance, but does not expect the adoption of this guidance will materially impact the Company's financial condition,
results of operations, or liquidity.
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income: In February of 2018, the FASB
issued guidance that requires a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded
tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Entities electing the reclassification are required to apply the guidance
either at the beginning of the period of adoption or retrospectively for all periods impacted. This guidance is effective for annual
and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has elected to reclassify $6.9
million of these stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings as of the beginning of the
period of adoption on January 1, 2018.
3. ACQUISITIONS
Completed Acquisitions
Standard Bancshares, Inc.
On January 6, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Standard Bancshares, Inc. ("Standard") the holding company for
Standard Bank and Trust Company. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, on January 6, 2017, each outstanding share
of Standard common stock was canceled and converted into the right to receive 0.4350 of a share of Company common stock.
Based on the closing price of a share of Company common stock of $25.34 on that date, as reported by NASDAQ, the value of
the merger consideration per share of Standard common stock was $11.02. Each outstanding Standard stock settled right was
redeemed for cash, and each outstanding Standard stock option and each share of Standard phantom stock was canceled and
terminated in exchange for the right to receive cash, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. This resulted in
an overall transaction value of approximately $580.7 million, which consisted of 21,057,085 shares of Company common stock
and $47.1 million in cash. Goodwill of $345.3 million associated with the acquisition was recorded by the Company. All operating
systems were converted during the first quarter of 2017.
During 2017, the Company finalized the fair value adjustments associated with the Standard transaction, which required a
measurement period adjustment of $6.0 million to increase goodwill. This adjustment was recognized in the current period in
accordance with accounting guidance applicable to business combinations.
Premier Asset Management LLC
On February 28, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Premier, a registered investment advisor based in Chicago,
Illinois. At the close of the acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $550.0 million of trust assets under management.
The fair value adjustments, including goodwill, associated with this transaction remain preliminary and may change as the Company
continues to finalize the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired.
NI Bancshares Corporation
On March 8, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of NI Bancshares Corporation ("NI Bancshares"), the holding company
for The National Bank & Trust Company of Sycamore, which included ten banking offices in northern Illinois and over $700.0
million in trust assets under management. The merger consideration was a combination of Company common stock and cash, at
a purchase price of $70.1 million. Goodwill of $22.2 million associated with the acquisition was recorded by the Company.
During 2017, the Company finalized the fair value adjustments associated with the NI Bancshares transaction, which required a
measurement period adjustment of $423,000 to increase goodwill. This adjustment was recognized in the current period in
accordance with accounting guidance applicable to business combinations.
91
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net of the fair value adjustments, in the Standard and NI
Bancshares transactions as of the acquisition date. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed, both intangible and tangible, were
recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and have been accounted for under the acquisition method of
accounting.
Acquisition Activity
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Standard
January 6, 2017
NI Bancshares
March 8, 2016
Assets
Cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in other banks. . . . . . . . . . . $
Securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB and FRB stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in BOLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises, furniture, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
102,149
214,107
—
3,247
1,762,303
8,424
55,629
345,334
31,072
56,517
60,278
2,639,060
675,354
1,348,520
2,023,874
—
—
34,471
2,058,345
Consideration Paid
Common stock (2017 - 21,057,085 share issued at $25.34 per share,
2016 - 3,042,494 shares issued at $18.059 per share), net of issuance costs . . . . . .
Cash paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consideration paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
533,590
47,125
580,715
2,639,060
$
$
72,533
125,843
1,864
1,549
396,181
2,863
8,384
22,174
10,408
19,636
16,453
677,888
130,909
464,012
594,921
2,416
230
10,239
607,806
54,896
15,186
70,082
677,888
Expenses related to the acquisition and integration of completed and pending transactions totaled $20.1 million, $14.4 million and
$1.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are reported as a separate component
within noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The acquisition of Standard was considered material to the
Company's financial statements; therefore, pro forma financial data and related disclosures are included in the following tables.
92
The unaudited pro forma combined results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented as if the
Standard acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2016, the first day of the Company's 2016 fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma
combined results of operations are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily indicate the financial results of
the combined companies had the companies actually been combined at the beginning of the period presented. The unaudited pro
forma combined results of operations also does not consider any potential impacts of potential revenue enhancements, anticipated
cost savings and expense efficiencies, or asset dispositions, among other factors. Acquisition and integration related expenses
directly attributable to the Standard acquisition have been excluded from the following table and were $19.1 million and $8.0
million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Results of Operations
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
Total revenues (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
636,762
$
109,195
616,922
108,770
(1)
Includes net interest income and total noninterest income.
Acquired loans are recorded at fair value, which incorporates credit risk, at the date of acquisition. No allowance for credit losses
is recorded on the acquisition date. Acquired loans are separated into (i) non-PCI and (ii) PCI loans. Non-PCI loans include loans
that did not have evidence of credit deterioration since origination at the acquisition date. PCI loans include loans that had evidence
of credit deterioration since origination and for which it was probable at acquisition that the Company would not collect all
contractually required principal and interest payments. PCI loans are accounted for based on estimates of expected future cash
flows. Accretable yield is recorded as interest income over the life of the loans if the timing and amount of the expected future
cash flows can be reasonably estimated. The non-accretable yield represents the difference between contractually required payments
and the expected future cash flows determined at acquisition. For additional discussion regarding significant accounting policies
on acquired loans see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
The following table presents additional detail for loans acquired in the Standard transaction at the acquisition date.
Standard Acquired Loans
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
January 6, 2017
PCI Loans
Non-PCI Loans
Fair value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Contractually required principal and interest payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Best estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (1) . . .
Best estimate of contractual cash flows expected to be collected. . . . . . . . .
125,382
$
218,680
65,610
153,070
1,636,921
1,930,311
100,469
1,829,842
(1)
Includes interest payments not expected to be collected due to loan prepayments as well as principal and interest payments not expected to be collected
due to customer default.
93
4. SECURITIES
A summary of the Company's securities portfolio by category and maturity is presented in the following tables.
Securities Portfolio
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
2017
Gross Unrealized
Losses
Gains
As of December 31,
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
2016
Gross Unrealized
Losses
Gains
Fair
Value
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities .
$
46,529
$
— $
(184) $
46,345
$
48,581
$
26
$
(66) $
48,541
U.S. agency securities . .
Collateralized mortgage
obligations ("CMOs") .
Other mortgage-backed
securities ("MBSs") . . .
Municipal securities . . . .
Trust-preferred
collateralized debt
obligations ("CDOs"). .
Equity securities. . . . . . .
Total securities
available-for-sale . . . .
157,636
197
(986)
156,847
183,528
519
(410)
183,637
1,113,019
121
(17,954)
1,095,186
1,064,130
969
(17,653)
1,047,446
373,676
209,558
—
7,408
201
693
—
194
(4,334)
(1,260)
369,543
208,991
337,139
273,319
1,395
1,245
(5,879)
(3,718)
332,655
270,846
—
(305)
—
7,297
47,681
3,206
261
147
(14,682)
(288)
33,260
3,065
$ 1,907,826
$
1,406
$ (25,023) $ 1,884,209
$ 1,957,584
$
4,562
$ (42,696) $ 1,919,450
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Municipal securities . . . .
$
13,760
$
— $ (1,747) $
12,013
$
22,291
$
— $ (4,079) $
18,212
Trading Securities. . . . . .
$
20,447
$
17,920
Remaining Contractual Maturity of Securities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2017
Available-for-Sale
Held-to-Maturity
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
One year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
87,379
$
87,053
$
1,432
$
After one year to five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After five years to ten years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After ten years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
323,203
3,141
—
322,000
3,130
—
Securities that do not have a single contractual maturity date . . .
1,494,103
1,472,026
5,831
2,243
4,254
—
1,250
5,090
1,959
3,714
—
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,907,826
$
1,884,209
$
13,760
$
12,013
The carrying value of securities available-for-sale that were pledged to secure deposits or for other purposes as permitted or
required by law totaled $1.1 billion for both December 31, 2017 and 2016. No securities held-to-maturity were pledged as of
December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Excluding securities issued or backed by the U.S. government and its agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, there
were no investments in securities from one issuer that exceeded 10% of total stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2017 or
2016.
94
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 there were no material gross trading gains (losses). The following
table presents net realized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale for the three years ended December 31, 2017.
Securities Available-for-Sale (Losses) Gains
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Gains (losses) on sales of securities:
Gross realized gains. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross realized losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net realized (losses) gains on sales of securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash impairment charges:
OTTI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net realized (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
$
5,478
(7,354)
(1,876)
—
(1,876) $
1,589
(169)
1,420
—
1,420
$
$
2,519
(146)
2,373
—
2,373
Net securities losses for 2017 consisted primarily of sales of CMOs and CDOs at net losses of $2.8 million and $404,000,
respectively, partially off-set by sales of municipal and other securities at gains of $854,000 and $449,000, respectively. During
2016, net securities gains consisted primarily of sales of municipal securities at net gains of $1.1 million and equity securities at
net gains of $304,000. Net securities gains for 2015 consisted primarily of sales of MBSs at net gains of $1.9 million and sales of
CMOs, municipal securities, and other investments at net gains of $521,000.
Accounting guidance requires that the credit portion of an OTTI charge be recognized through income. If a decline in fair value
below carrying value is not attributable to credit deterioration and the Company does not intend to sell the security or believe it
would not be more likely than not required to sell the security prior to recovery, the Company records the non-credit related portion
of the decline in fair value in other comprehensive income (loss).
The following table presents a rollforward of life-to-date OTTI recognized in earnings related to all securities available-for-sale
held by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Changes in OTTI Recognized in Earnings
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
23,345
$
23,345
$
23,516
OTTI included in earnings (1):
Losses on securities that previously had OTTI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Losses on securities that did not previously have OTTI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reduction for securities sales (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
(23,345)
$
— $
—
—
—
23,345
$
—
—
(171)
23,345
(1)
(2)
Included in net securities (losses) gains in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
These reductions were driven by the sale of 11 CDOs with a carrying value of $47.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 and one CMO
with a carrying value of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.
95
The following table presents the aggregate amount of unrealized losses and the aggregate related fair values of securities with
unrealized losses as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Less Than 12 Months
Greater Than 12 Months
Total
Number of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
As of December 31, 2017
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities. . . . . . . .
U.S. agency securities . . . . . . . .
CMOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MBSs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities Held-to-Maturity
20
72
211
86
265
2
656
$
19,918
66,899
365,131
126,136
35,500
391
$ 613,975
$
$
87
300
3,265
902
479
214
5,247
$
26,427
58,021
633,227
210,017
81,360
6,386
$1,015,438
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . .
8
$
— $
— $
12,013
As of December 31, 2016
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities. . . . . . . .
U.S. agency securities . . . . . . . .
CMOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MBSs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . .
CDOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities Held-to-Maturity
16
28
194
68
380
7
2
695
$
33,505
62,064
523,233
221,174
133,957
—
404
$ 974,337
$
$
61
364
10,309
4,726
3,059
—
201
18,720
$
3,995
11,814
411,758
77,780
29,280
30,592
2,319
$ 567,538
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . .
14
$
— $
— $
18,212
$
$
$
$
$
$
97
686
14,689
3,432
781
91
19,776
$
46,345
124,920
998,358
336,153
116,860
6,777
$ 1,629,413
1,747
$
12,013
5
46
7,344
1,154
659
14,682
86
23,976
$
37,500
73,878
934,991
298,954
163,237
30,592
2,723
$ 1,541,875
4,079
$
18,212
$
$
$
$
$
$
184
986
17,954
4,334
1,260
305
25,023
1,747
66
410
17,653
5,880
3,718
14,682
287
42,696
4,079
Substantially all of the Company's CMOs and other MBSs are either backed by U.S. government-owned agencies or issued by
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. Municipal securities are issued by municipal authorities, and the majority are supported
by third-party insurance or some other form of credit enhancement. Management does not believe any of these securities with
unrealized losses as of December 31, 2017 represent OTTI related to credit deterioration. These unrealized losses are attributed
to changes in interest rates and temporary market movements. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not
more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be
at maturity.
96
5. LOANS
Loans Held-for-Investment
The following table presents the Company's loans held-for-investment by class.
Loan Portfolio
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
$
As of December 31,
2017
3,529,914
430,886
$
2016
2,827,658
389,496
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total corporate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred loan fees included in total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Overdrawn demand deposits included in total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,979,820
675,463
539,820
1,358,515
4,553,618
8,514,418
827,055
774,357
321,982
1,923,394
10,437,812
4,986
8,587
$
$
$
$
1,581,967
614,052
451,540
979,528
3,627,087
6,844,241
747,983
423,922
237,999
1,409,904
8,254,145
3,838
7,836
The Company primarily lends to community-based and mid-sized businesses, commercial real estate customers, and consumers
in its markets. Within these areas, the Company diversifies its loan portfolio by loan type, industry, and borrower.
Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower's ability to operate its business.
As part of the underwriting process, the Company examines current and expected future cash flows to determine the ability of the
borrower to repay its obligation. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the
borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of the borrower may not be as
expected, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value due to economic or other factors. Most commercial and
industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets, such as accounts receivable or inventory, and
may incorporate a personal guarantee. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment
of these loans substantially depend on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Some short-term
loans may be made on an unsecured basis.
Agricultural loans are generally provided to meet seasonal production, equipment, and farm real estate borrowing needs of
individual and corporate crop and livestock producers. As part of the underwriting process, the Company examines projected
future cash flows, financial statement stability, and the value of the underlying collateral. Seasonal crop production loans are repaid
by the liquidation of the financed crop that is typically covered by crop insurance. Equipment and real estate term loans are repaid
through cash flows of the farming operation.
Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans. The
repayment of commercial real estate loans depends on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business
conducted on the property securing the loan. This category of loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate
market. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on cash flow, collateral, geography, and risk
rating criteria. The mix of properties securing the loans in our commercial real estate portfolio are balanced between owner-
occupied and investor categories and is diverse in terms of type and geographic location, generally within the Company's markets.
Construction loans are generally made based on estimates of costs and values associated with the completed project and are
underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analyses of absorption and lease rates, and
financial analyses of the developers and property owners. Sources of repayment may be permanent loans from long-term lenders,
sales of developed property, or an interim loan commitment until permanent financing is obtained. Generally, construction loans
97
have a higher risk profile than other real estate loans since repayment is impacted by real estate values, interest rate changes,
governmental regulation of real property, demand and supply of alternative real estate, the availability of long-term financing, and
changes in general economic conditions.
Consumer loans are centrally underwritten using a credit scoring model developed by the Fair Isaac Corporation ("FICO"), which
employs a risk-based system to determine the probability that a borrower may default. Underwriting standards for home equity
loans are heavily influenced by statutory requirements, which include loan-to-value and affordability ratios, risk-based pricing
strategies, and documentation requirements. The home equity category consists mainly of revolving lines of credit secured by
junior liens on owner-occupied real estate. Loan-to-value ratios on home equity loans and 1-4 family mortgages are based on the
current appraised value of the collateral. Repayment for these loans is dependent on the borrower's continued financial stability,
and is more likely to be impacted by adverse personal circumstances.
The Bank is a member of the FHLB and FRB and has access to financing secured by designated assets that may include qualifying
commercial real estate, residential and multi-family mortgages, home equity loans, and certain municipal and mortgage-backed
securities. The carrying value of loans that were pledged to secure liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented
below.
Carrying Value of Loans Pledged
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31
2017
2016
Loans pledged to secure:
FHLB advances (blanket pledge) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FRB's Discount Window Primary Credit Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
4,587,240
1,099,712
5,686,952
$
$
3,667,202
777,950
4,445,152
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, based on loans pledged under a blanket pledge agreement noted in the table above, the Bank
was eligible to borrow up to $2.6 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, in FHLB advances. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the Bank was eligible to borrow up to $843.6 million and $629.7 million, respectively, through the FRB's Discount Window
Primary Credit Program based on assets pledged. For additional disclosure related to the Company's outstanding balance of
borrowings, see Note 11, "Borrowed Funds."
Loan Sales
The following table presents loan sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Loan Sales
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Corporate loan sales
Proceeds from sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less book value of loans sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gains on corporate sales (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgage loan sales
Proceeds from sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less book value of loans sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gains on 1-4 family mortgage sales (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total net gains on loan sales
$
$
$
$
2017
As of December 31,
2016
2015
52,974
51,781
1,193
258,626
252,741
5,885
7,078
$
$
$
$
54,681
52,821
1,860
290,383
283,312
7,071
8,931
$
$
$
$
31,091
29,535
1,556
185,308
180,017
5,291
6,847
(1) Net gains on corporate loan sales are included in other service charges, commissions, and fees in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Net gains on mortgage loan sales are included in mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company retained servicing responsibilities for a portion of the 1-4 family mortgage loans sold and collects servicing fees
equal to a percentage of the outstanding principal balance. For additional disclosure related to the Company's obligations resulting
from the sale of certain 1-4 family mortgage loans, see Note 20, "Commitments, Guarantees, and Contingent Liabilities."
98
6. ACQUIRED AND COVERED LOANS
Covered loans consist of loans acquired by the Company in FDIC-assisted transactions which are covered by the FDIC Agreements.
Acquired loans consist of all other loans that were acquired in business combinations that are not covered by the FDIC Agreements.
Both acquired and covered loans are included in loans in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The significant
accounting policies related to acquired and covered loans, which are classified as PCI and Non-PCI, and the related FDIC
indemnification asset, are presented in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
Non-residential mortgage loans related to FDIC-assisted transactions are no longer covered under the FDIC Agreements. These
non-residential loans, which totaled $12.7 million and $14.9 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are included
in acquired loans and no longer classified as covered loans. The losses on residential mortgage loans will continue to be covered
under the FDIC Agreements through various dates between December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2020.
The following table presents acquired and covered PCI and Non-PCI loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Acquired and Covered Loans
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Acquired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Covered loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total acquired and covered loans . . . . . . . . .
PCI
$ 130,694
6,759
$ 137,453
Non-PCI
$ 1,512,664
11,789
$ 1,524,453
Total
$ 1,643,358
18,548
$ 1,661,906
$
$
PCI
53,772
7,895
61,667
Non-PCI
$ 613,339
15,379
$ 628,718
Total
$ 667,111
23,274
$ 690,385
The outstanding balance of PCI loans was $210.7 million and $84.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Acquired non-PCI loans that are renewed are no longer classified as acquired loans. These loans totaled $366.0 million and $117.6
million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In connection with the FDIC Agreements, the Company recorded an indemnification asset. To maintain eligibility for the loss
share reimbursement, the Company is required to follow certain servicing procedures as specified in the FDIC Agreements. The
Company was in compliance with those requirements as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
A rollforward of the carrying value of the FDIC indemnification asset for the three years ended December 31, 2017 is presented
in the following table.
Changes in the FDIC Indemnification Asset
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in expected reimbursements from the FDIC for changes in
expected credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net payments to (from) the FDIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
4,522
(1,208)
(792)
792
3,314
$
$
3,903
(1,185)
330
1,474
4,522
$
8,452
(1,461)
1,313
(4,401)
3,903
99
Changes in the accretable yield for acquired and covered PCI loans were as follows.
Changes in Accretable Yield
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2017
2015
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
19,386
27,316
(15,529)
1,784
32,957
$
$
24,912
3,981
(8,063)
(1,444)
19,386
$
$
28,244
1,168
(11,311)
6,811
24,912
(1)
Increases represent a rise in the expected future cash flows to be collected over the remaining estimated life of the underlying portfolio while
decreases result from the resolution of certain loans occurring earlier than anticipated.
Total accretion on acquired and covered PCI and non-PCI loans for December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $33.9 million, $14.6
million, and $16.3 million, respectively.
100
7. PAST DUE LOANS, ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES, IMPAIRED LOANS, AND TDRS
Past Due and Non-accrual Loans
The following table presents an aging analysis of the Company's past due loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The aging is
determined without regard to accrual status. The table also presents non-performing loans, consisting of non-accrual loans (the
majority of which are past due) and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, as of each balance sheet date.
Aging Analysis of Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Loans by Class
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Aging Analysis (Accruing and Non-accrual)
Current (1)
30-89
Days
Past Due
90 Days or
More Past
Due
Total
Past Due
Total
Loans
Non-performing Loans
90 Days
or More
Past Due,
Still
Accruing
Interest
Non-
accrual (2)
As of December 31, 2017
Commercial and industrial . . . . . .
Agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . .
Total commercial real estate . .
Total corporate loans. . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans. . . . . . .
Total loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2016
Commercial and industrial . . . . . .
Agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . .
Total commercial real estate . .
Total corporate loans. . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans. . . . . . .
Total loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,490,783
430,221
$ 34,620
280
$
4,511
385
$
39,131
665
$ 3,529,914
430,886
$
40,580
219
$
1,830
177
1,970,564
672,098
539,043
1,353,263
4,534,968
8,455,972
820,099
770,120
319,178
1,909,397
$10,365,369
3,156
3,117
198
2,545
9,016
43,916
4,102
2,145
2,407
8,654
$ 52,570
$ 2,816,442
388,596
$
6,426
—
1,564,007
612,446
450,927
974,575
3,601,955
6,806,993
740,919
420,264
236,264
1,397,447
$ 8,204,440
5,327
858
332
1,307
7,824
14,250
4,545
2,652
1,476
8,673
$ 22,923
$
$
$
6,100
248
579
2,707
9,634
14,530
2,854
2,092
397
5,343
19,873
4,790
900
12,633
748
281
3,646
17,308
22,998
2,519
1,006
259
3,784
26,782
9,256
3,365
777
5,252
18,650
58,446
6,956
4,237
2,804
13,997
72,443
1,979,820
675,463
539,820
1,358,515
4,553,618
8,514,418
827,055
774,357
321,982
1,923,394
$10,437,812
11,216
900
$ 2,827,658
389,496
17,960
1,606
613
4,953
25,132
37,248
7,064
3,658
1,735
12,457
49,705
1,581,967
614,052
451,540
979,528
3,627,087
6,844,241
747,983
423,922
237,999
1,409,904
$ 8,254,145
$
$
$
11,560
377
209
3,621
15,767
56,566
5,946
4,412
—
10,358
66,924
29,938
181
17,277
311
286
2,892
20,766
50,885
5,465
2,939
—
8,404
59,289
$
$
$
345
20
371
317
1,053
3,060
98
—
397
495
3,555
374
736
1,129
604
—
1,526
3,259
4,369
109
272
259
640
5,009
$
$
$
(1)
(2)
PCI loans with an accretable yield are considered current.
Includes PCI loans of $763,000 and $681,000 as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which no longer have an accretable yield
as estimates of expected future cash flows have decreased since the acquisition due to credit deterioration.
101
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level deemed adequate by management to absorb estimated losses
inherent in the existing loan portfolio. See Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," for the accounting policy for
the allowance for credit losses. A rollforward of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 is presented in the table below.
Allowance for Credit Losses by Portfolio Segment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial,
Industrial,
and
Agricultural
Office,
Retail, and
Industrial
Multi-family Construction
Other
Commercial
Real Estate
Consumer
Reserve for
Unfunded
Commitments
Total
Allowance
for Credit
Losses
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Beginning balance. . . . .
$
40,709
$
17,595
$
3,261
$
3,444
$
7,739
$
13,335
$
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . .
(22,885)
Recoveries . . . . . . . . .
4,150
Net charge-offs . . . .
(18,735)
(190)
2,935
2,745
—
39
39
(38)
270
232
Provision for loan
losses and other . . . .
33,817
(9,344)
(766)
(195)
(755)
244
(511)
(847)
(6,955)
1,541
(5,414)
8,625
1,000
—
—
—
—
$
87,083
(30,823)
9,179
(21,644)
31,290
Ending Balance . . . . . . .
$
55,791
$
10,996
$
2,534
$
3,481
$
6,381
$
16,546
$
1,000
$
96,729
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Beginning balance. . . . .
$
37,074
$
13,124
$
2,469
$
1,440
$
6,109
$
13,414
$
1,225
$
74,855
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . .
Net charge-offs . . . .
Provision for loan
losses and other . . . .
(9,982)
2,451
(7,531)
(4,707)
337
(4,370)
(307)
97
(210)
(134)
56
(78)
(2,932)
524
(2,408)
(5,231)
1,298
(3,933)
—
—
—
(23,293)
4,763
(18,530)
11,166
8,841
1,002
2,082
4,038
3,854
(225)
30,758
Ending balance . . . . . . .
$
40,709
$
17,595
$
3,261
$
3,444
$
7,739
$
13,335
$
1,000
$
87,083
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Beginning balance. . . . .
$
31,177
$
13,053
$
2,387
$
3,031
$
9,019
$
14,027
$
1,816
$
74,510
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . .
(16,422)
(2,899)
Recoveries . . . . . . . . .
2,588
534
Net charge-offs . . . .
(13,834)
(2,365)
(568)
15
(553)
(139)
350
211
(2,678)
2,031
(647)
(4,211)
1,183
(3,028)
—
—
—
(26,917)
6,701
(20,216)
Provision for loan
losses and other . . . . .
19,731
2,436
635
(1,802)
(2,263)
2,415
(591)
20,561
Ending balance . . . . . . .
$
37,074
$
13,124
$
2,469
$
1,440
$
6,109
$
13,414
$
1,225
$
74,855
102
The table below provides a breakdown of loans and the related allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment as of December 31,
2017 and 2016.
Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses by Portfolio Segment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Loans
Allowance for Credit Losses
Individually
Evaluated
for
Impairment
Collectively
Evaluated
for
Impairment
PCI
Total
Individually
Evaluated
for
Impairment
Collectively
Evaluated
for
Impairment
PCI
Total
As of December 31, 2017
Commercial, industrial, and
agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
$
38,718
$ 3,909,380
$
12,702
$ 3,960,800
$
10,074
$
45,293
$
424
$
55,791
Office, retail, and industrial . . . .
10,810
1,954,435
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . .
Total commercial real estate . .
Total corporate loans . . . . . .
Consumer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserve for unfunded
commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
621
—
1,468
12,899
51,617
—
—
660,771
530,977
1,291,723
4,437,906
8,347,286
1,901,456
14,575
14,071
8,843
1,979,820
675,463
539,820
65,324
1,358,515
102,813
115,515
4,553,618
8,514,418
21,938
1,923,394
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10,074
—
—
9,333
2,436
3,331
5,415
20,515
65,808
15,533
1,000
1,663
10,996
98
150
966
2,877
3,301
1,013
2,534
3,481
6,381
23,392
79,183
16,546
—
1,000
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
51,617
$ 10,248,742
$
137,453
$10,437,812
$
10,074
$
82,341
$
4,314
$
96,729
As of December 31, 2016
Commercial, industrial, and
agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
$
24,645
$ 3,189,327
$
3,182
$ 3,217,154
$
507
$
39,554
$
648
$
40,709
Office, retail, and industrial . . . .
16,287
1,553,234
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . .
Total commercial real estate.
Total corporate loans . . . . .
Consumer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserve for unfunded
commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
398
34
1,286
18,005
42,650
—
—
601,429
447,058
965,900
3,567,621
6,756,948
1,392,880
12,446
12,225
4,448
12,342
41,461
44,643
17,024
1,581,967
614,052
451,540
979,528
3,627,087
6,844,241
1,409,904
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
18
525
—
—
16,148
3,059
3,280
6,613
29,100
68,654
12,210
1,000
1,447
17,595
202
164
1,108
2,921
3,569
1,125
3,261
3,444
7,739
32,039
72,748
13,335
—
1,000
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
42,650
$ 8,149,828
$
61,667
$ 8,254,145
$
525
$
81,864
$
4,694
$
87,083
103
Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment
The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loan as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. PCI
loans are excluded from this disclosure.
Impaired Loans Individually Evaluated by Class
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Recorded Investment In
Loans with
No
Specific
Reserve
Loans
with
a Specific
Reserve
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Specific
Reserve
Recorded Investment In
Loans with
No
Specific
Reserve
Loans
with
a Specific
Reserve
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Specific
Reserve
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . .
$
4,234
$
34,484
$ 53,192
$ 10,074
$
11,579
$
13,066
$ 29,514
$
Agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . .
7,154
3,656
14,246
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . .
Total commercial real estate . . . .
Total impaired loans
individually evaluated
for impairment . . . . . . . . . . . .
621
—
1,468
9,243
—
—
—
3,656
621
—
1,566
16,433
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16,287
398
34
1,016
17,735
—
—
—
—
270
270
—
21,057
398
34
2,141
23,630
$
13,477
$
38,140
$ 69,625
$ 10,074
$
29,314
$
13,336
$ 53,144
$
525
The following table presents the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans by class for the
years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015. PCI loans are excluded from this disclosure.
Average Recorded Investment and Interest Income Recognized on Impaired Loans by Class
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2017
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
$
33,956
$
1,059
$
9,178
$
104
$
8,940
$
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . .
Agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate. . . . . . . .
Total impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(1) Recorded using the cash basis of accounting.
279
13,106
441
7
1,615
15,170
49,404
101
325
28
136
41
530
1,690
$
$
—
12,867
479
63
2,809
16,218
25,396
$
—
291
11
—
86
388
492
—
9,359
855
3,902
3,310
17,426
26,366
$
$
104
507
—
—
—
—
18
18
163
—
52
13
118
44
227
390
Credit Quality Indicators
Corporate loans and commitments are assessed for credit risk and assigned ratings based on various characteristics, such as the
borrower's cash flow, leverage, and collateral. Ratings for commercial credits are reviewed periodically. The following tables
present credit quality indicators by class for corporate and consumer loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Corporate Credit Quality Indicators by Class
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Pass
Special
Mention (1)(4)
Substandard (2)(4)
Non-accrual (3)
Total
As of December 31, 2017
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
3,388,133
$
70,863
$
30,338
$
40,580
$ 3,529,914
Agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
413,946
10,989
5,732
219
430,886
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,903,737
Multi-family. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . .
665,496
521,911
1,304,337
4,395,481
25,546
7,395
10,184
29,624
72,749
38,977
2,195
7,516
20,933
69,621
11,560
1,979,820
377
209
3,621
15,767
675,463
539,820
1,358,515
4,553,618
Total corporate loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
8,197,560
$
154,601
$
105,691
$
56,566
$ 8,514,418
As of December 31, 2016
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,638,833
$
92,340
$
66,547
$
29,938
$ 2,827,658
Agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
366,382
17,039
5,894
181
389,496
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,491,170
Multi-family. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . .
607,342
438,946
951,284
Total commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . .
3,488,742
34,007
4,370
111
11,808
50,296
39,513
2,029
12,197
13,544
67,283
17,277
1,581,967
311
286
2,892
20,766
614,052
451,540
979,528
3,627,087
Total corporate loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
6,493,957
$
159,675
$
139,724
$
50,885
$ 6,844,241
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Loans categorized as special mention exhibit potential weaknesses that require the close attention of management since these potential weaknesses
may result in the deterioration of repayment prospects in the future.
Loans categorized as substandard exhibit a well-defined weakness that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. These loans continue to accrue
interest because they are well-secured and collection of principal and interest is expected within a reasonable time.
Loans categorized as non-accrual exhibit a well-defined weakness that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt or result in a loss if the deficiencies
are not corrected.
Total special mention and substandard loans includes accruing TDRs of $657,000 as of December 31, 2017 and $834,000 as of December 31, 2016.
Consumer Credit Quality Indicators by Class
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Performing
Non-accrual
Total
As of December 31, 2017
Home equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
821,109
$
5,946
$
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
769,945
321,982
4,412
—
827,055
774,357
321,982
Total consumer loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2016
Home equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
1,913,036
$
10,358
$
1,923,394
742,518
$
5,465
$
420,983
237,999
2,939
—
747,983
423,922
237,999
Total consumer loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,401,500
$
8,404
$
1,409,904
105
TDRs
TDRs are generally performed at the request of the individual borrower and may include forgiveness of principal, reduction in
interest rates, changes in payments, and maturity date extensions. The table below presents TDRs by class as of December 31,
2017 and 2016. See Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," for the accounting policy for TDRs.
TDRs by Class
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . .
Agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate:
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . .
Total commercial real estate . . . .
Total corporate loans . . . . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total consumer loans. . . . . . . . .
Total loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruing
264
$
—
Non-accrual (1)
18,959
$
—
Total
$
19,223
—
Accruing
281
$
—
Non-accrual (1)
150
$
—
$
—
574
—
192
766
1,030
86
680
—
766
1,796
$
$
4,236
149
—
—
4,385
23,344
738
451
—
1,189
24,533
$
4,236
723
—
192
5,151
24,374
824
1,131
—
1,955
26,329
$
155
586
—
268
1,009
1,290
177
824
—
1,001
2,291
$
4,733
168
—
48
4,949
5,099
820
378
—
1,198
6,297
$
Total
431
—
4,888
754
—
316
5,958
6,389
997
1,202
—
2,199
8,588
(1)
These TDRs are included in non-accrual loans in the preceding tables.
TDRs are included in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses in the same manner as impaired loans. There were $2.0
million in specific reserves related to TDRs as of December 31, 2017, and there were no specific reserves related to TDRs as of
December 31, 2016.
The following table presents a summary of loans that were restructured during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and
2015.
Loans Restructured During the Period
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Number
of
Loans
Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
Funds
Disbursed
Interest
and Escrow
Capitalized
Charge-offs
Post-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Commercial and industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
$
26,733
$
9,035
$
— $
6,232
$
29,536
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
3,656
—
—
—
3,656
Total loans restructured during the period . . . .
14
$
30,389
$
9,035
$
— $
6,232
$
33,192
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Office, retail, and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans restructured during the period . . . .
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Home equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1-4 family mortgages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans restructured during the period . . . .
1
1
2
1
2
3
$
$
$
$
5,460
$
— $
— $
1,083
$
745
—
—
—
6,205
$
— $
— $
1,083
$
120
325
445
$
$
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
4,377
745
5,122
120
325
445
106
Accruing TDRs that do not perform in accordance with their modified terms are transferred to non-accrual. The following table
presents TDRs that had payment defaults during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 where the default occurred
within twelve months of the restructure date.
TDRs That Defaulted Within Twelve Months of the Restructured Date
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Home equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— $
— $
—
—
Number
of
Loans
Recorded
Investment
Number
of
Loans
Recorded
Investment
1
1
$
$
119
119
Number
of
Loans
Recorded
Investment
— $
— $
—
—
A rollforward of the carrying value of TDRs for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 is presented in the following
table.
TDR Rollforward
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Accruing
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,291
$
2,743
$
3,704
Additions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Returned to performing status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net transfers to non-accrual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-accrual
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfers to OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net transfers from accruing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15,819
(1,923)
—
(14,391)
1,796
6,297
14,570
(4,380)
(6,345)
—
—
14,391
24,533
—
(120)
—
(332)
2,291
2,324
6,205
(1,072)
(1,492)
—
—
332
6,297
Total TDRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
26,329
$
8,588
$
120
(774)
—
(307)
2,743
19,904
325
(15,525)
(2,687)
—
—
307
2,324
5,067
For TDRs to be removed from TDR status in the calendar year after the restructuring, the loans must (i) have an interest rate and
terms that reflect market conditions at the time of restructuring, and (ii) be in compliance with the modified terms. Loans that
were not restructured at market rates and terms, that are not in compliance with the modified terms, or for which there is a concern
about the future ability of the borrower to meet its obligations under the modified terms, continue to be separately reported as
restructured until paid in full or charged-off.
There were no material commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers with TDRs as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
107
8. PREMISES, FURNITURE, AND EQUIPMENT
The following table summarizes the Company's premises, furniture, and equipment by category.
Premises, Furniture, and Equipment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net book value of premises, furniture, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises, furniture, and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
As of December 31,
2017
2016
30,470
123,873
115,013
269,356
(148,248)
121,108
2,208
123,316
$
$
18,304
94,369
105,859
218,532
(140,030)
78,502
4,075
82,577
During 2016, the Bank completed a sale-leaseback transaction, whereby the Bank sold to a third-party for an aggregate cash
purchase price of $150.3 million, 55 properties with book values totaling $58.8 million, owned and operated by the Bank as
branches. The Bank concurrently entered into triple net lease agreements with certain affiliates of the third-party for each of the
branches sold. Subject to the right of the Bank to terminate certain of the lease agreements at the end of the eleventh year, the
lease agreements have initial terms of 14 years. Each lease agreement provides the Bank with five consecutive renewal options
of five years each. The sale-leaseback transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $88.0 million, net of transaction related expenses,
of which $5.5 million was immediately recognized in earnings. Remaining pre-tax gains were $74.6 million and $81.0 million as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and will be accreted as a reduction to lease expense in net occupancy and equipment
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income on a straight-line basis over the initial terms of the leases.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, assets held-for-sale consisted of former branches that are no longer in operation and parcels
of land previously purchased for expansion.
Depreciation on premises, furniture, and equipment totaled $14.0 million in 2017, $12.8 million in 2016, and $13.4 million in
2015.
Operating Leases
As of December 31, 2017, the Company was obligated to utilize certain premises and equipment under certain non-cancelable
operating leases, which expire at various dates through the year ending December 31, 2033. Many of these leases contain renewal
options and certain leases provide options to purchase the leased property during or at the expiration of the lease period at specific
prices. Some leases contain escalation clauses calling for rentals to be adjusted for increased real estate taxes and other operating
expenses or proportionately adjusted for increases in consumer or other price indices. The following summary reflects the future
minimum payments by year required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess
of one year as of December 31, 2017.
Future Minimum Operating Lease Payments
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total minimum lease payments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Total
19,241
17,659
16,926
16,732
16,464
119,847
206,869
108
The Company assumed certain operating leases related to various branches in previous acquisitions. An intangible liability is
recorded when the cash flows of a lease exceed its fair market value. This intangible liability is accreted into income as a reduction
to net occupancy and equipment expense using the straight-line method over the initial term of each lease, which expire between
2018 and 2030. The intangible liability is included in accrued interest and other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition.
The following table presents the remaining scheduled accretion of the intangible liability by year.
Scheduled Accretion of Operating Lease Intangible
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total accretion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Total
935
685
648
648
639
3,358
6,913
The following table presents net operating lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Net Operating Lease Expense
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Lease expense charged to operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of operating lease intangible (1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of deferred gain on sale-leaseback transaction (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rental income from premises leased to others (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating lease expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
18,666
$
11,207
$
(1,180)
(5,872)
(682)
(1,171)
(1,473)
(527)
10,932
$
8,036
$
6,850
(1,144)
—
(606)
5,100
(1)
Included as reductions to net occupancy and equipment expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
9. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company's annual goodwill impairment test was performed as of October 1, 2017. It was determined that no impairment
existed as of that date or as of December 31, 2017. For a discussion of the accounting policies for goodwill and other intangible
assets, see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Changes in the Carrying Amount of Goodwill
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
340,879
$
319,007
$
356,729
21,872
697,608
$
340,879
$
310,589
8,418
319,007
The increase in goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2017 resulted from the Standard and Premier acquisitions and
measurement period adjustments related to finalizing the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the NI
Bancshares acquisition. During the year ended December 31, 2016 the increase resulted from the NI Bancshares acquisition and
measurement period adjustments related to finalizing the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Peoples
109
Bancorp, Inc. ("Peoples") acquisition. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the increase in goodwill resulted from the
Peoples acquisition and measurement period adjustments related to finalizing the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the Great Lakes Financial Resources, Inc. acquisition. See Note 3, "Acquisitions," for additional detail regarding
transactions completed in 2017 and 2016.
The Company's other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles and trust department customer relationship intangibles,
which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives. Other intangible assets are subject to impairment testing when events
or circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The increase in other intangible assets for the year
ended December 31, 2017 resulted from the Standard and Premier acquisitions. The increase in other intangible assets for the year
ended December 31, 2016 resulted from the NI Bancshares acquisition. During 2017 there were no events or circumstances to
indicate impairment.
Other Intangible Assets
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2017
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Gross
2016
Accumulated
Amortization
2015
Net
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Beginning balance . . . . . . .
$ 58,959
$
32,962
$
25,997
$ 48,550
$
28,280
$
20,270
$ 47,970
$
24,360
$
23,610
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39,017
Amortization expense . . .
—
—
7,865
39,017
10,409
(7,865)
—
—
4,682
10,409
(4,682)
580
—
—
3,920
580
(3,920)
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . .
$ 97,976
$
40,827
$
57,149
$ 58,959
$
32,962
$
25,997
$ 48,550
$
28,280
$
20,270
Weighted-average remaining life (in years)
Estimated remaining useful lives (in years)
8.3
0.2 to 9.3
7.6
0.6 to 9.3
7.4
0.8 to 10.0
Scheduled Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
Total
7,139
7,073
7,023
6,946
6,867
22,101
57,149
10. DEPOSITS
The following table presents the Company's deposits by type.
Summary of Deposits
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits less than $100,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits greater than $100,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
3,576,190
2,011,999
1,962,304
1,856,049
904,882
741,901
11,053,325
$
$
2,766,748
1,615,833
1,675,421
1,577,316
755,558
437,727
8,828,603
110
The following table provides maturity information related to the Company's time deposits.
Scheduled Maturities of Time Deposits
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 and thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
1,086,528
418,176
86,196
38,569
16,845
469
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,646,783
11. BORROWED FUNDS
The following table summarizes the Company's borrowed funds by funding source.
Summary of Borrowed Funds
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
124,884
590,000
714,884
$
$
129,008
750,000
879,008
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are treated as financings and the obligations to repurchase securities sold are
included as a liability in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Repurchase agreements are secured by U.S. treasury
and agency securities which are held in third-party pledge accounts, if required. The securities underlying the agreements remain
in the respective asset accounts. As of December 31, 2017, the Company did not have amounts at risk under repurchase agreements
with any individual counterparty or group of counterparties that exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity.
The Bank is a member of the FHLB and has access to term financing from the FHLB. These advances are secured by designated
assets that may include qualifying commercial real estate, residential and multi-family mortgages, home equity loans, and certain
municipal and mortgage-backed securities. See Note 5, "Loans," for detail of the carrying value of loans pledged. As of
December 31, 2017, FHLB advances had fixed interest rates that range from 1.30% to 1.46% and maturity dates that range from
January 2, 2018 to March 1, 2018.
The Company hedges interest rates on borrowed funds using interest rate swaps through which the Company receives variable
amounts and pays fixed amounts. See Note 19 "Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" for a detailed discussion of interest
rate swaps.
The following table presents short-term credit lines available for use, for which the Company did not have an outstanding balance
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Short-Term Credit Lines Available for Use
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
FRBs Discount Window Primary Credit Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
843,618
$
Available federal funds lines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Correspondent bank line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
667,000
50,000
629,699
632,000
50,000
111
On September 27, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with U.S. Bank National Association providing for a $50.0
million short-term, unsecured revolving credit facility. On September 26, 2017, the Company entered into a first amendment to
this credit facility, which extends the maturity to September 26, 2018. Advances will bear interest at a rate equal to one-month
LIBOR plus 1.75%, adjusted on a monthly basis, and the Company must pay an unused facility fee equal to 0.35% per annum on
a quarterly basis. Management may use this line of credit for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2017, no amount
was outstanding under the facility.
None of the Company's borrowings have any related compensating balance requirements that restrict the use of Company assets.
12. SENIOR AND SUBORDINATED DEBT
The following table presents the Company's senior and subordinated debt by issuance.
Senior and Subordinated Debt
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Issuance Date
Subordinated notes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 2016
Junior subordinated debentures:
Maturity Date
September 2026
Interest Rate
5.875%
$
As of December 31,
2016
2017
146,573
146,927
$
First Midwest Capital Trust I ("FMCT"). . . . . . November 2003 December 2033
Great Lakes Statutory Trust II ("GLST II") (1) . December 2005 December 2035
Great Lakes Statutory Trust III ("GLST III") (1)
Total junior subordinated debentures . . . . . . .
Total senior and subordinated debt. . . . . . . .
6.950%
L+1.400% (2)
September 2037 L+1.700% (2)
June 2007
37,801
4,486
5,956
48,243
195,170
$
37,800
4,391
5,839
48,030
194,603
$
(1) The junior subordinated debentures related to GLST II and GLST III were assumed by the Company through an acquisition. As of December 31, 2017,
these amounts include acquisition adjustments which resulted in a discount of $1.7 million to GLST II and $2.3 million to GLST III. The acquisition
adjustments totaled $1.8 million and $2.4 million to GLST II and GLST III, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.
(2) The interest rates are a variable rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 1.400% and 1.700% for GLST II and GLST III, respectively.
On April 1, 2016, $38.5 million of 5.850% subordinated notes matured and were repaid by the Company and on November 22,
2016, $115.0 million of 5.875% senior notes matured and were repaid by the Company.
Issuance of Subordinated Notes
On September 29, 2016, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875%
subordinated notes due 2026. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on March 29 and September 29, beginning on March
29, 2017. The Company received proceeds of $146.5 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and issuance costs.
The Company used the net proceeds to repay at maturity the entire $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% senior
notes on November 22, 2016, plus accrued interest, and for other general corporate purposes.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
FMCT, GLST II and GLST III are Delaware statutory business trusts. These trusts were established for the purpose of issuing
trust-preferred securities and lending the proceeds to the Company in return for junior subordinated debentures of the Company.
The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of each trust. Therefore, each trust's ability to pay amounts due on the trust-
preferred securities is solely dependent on the Company making payments on the related junior subordinated debentures. The
trust-preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, on repayment of the junior subordinated
debentures at the stated maturity date or on redemption. The Company guarantees payments of distributions and redemptions on
the trust-preferred securities on a limited basis.
Trust-preferred securities are included in Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory capital purposes. The statutory trusts qualify
as variable interest entities for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Consequently, the accounts of those entities are
not consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
112
13. MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS AFFECTING STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Issued Common Stock
On January 6, 2017, the Company issued 21,057,085 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock at a price of $25.34 as part of
the consideration in the Standard acquisition. Additional information regarding the Standard acquisition is presented in Note 3,
"Acquisitions."
On March 8, 2016, the Company issued 3,042,494 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock at a price of $18.059 as part of the
consideration in the NI Bancshares acquisition. Additional information regarding the NI Bancshares acquisition is presented in
Note 3, "Acquisitions."
Authorized Common Stock
On May 17, 2017, the Company's stockholders approved and adopted an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation. The amendment increased the Company's authorized common stock by 100,000,000 shares. Following this
amendment, the Company is now authorized to issue a total of 251,000,000 shares, including 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
without a par value, and 250,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share.
Quarterly Dividend on Common Shares
The Company's Board of Directors ("the Board") declared cash dividends on the Company's common stock of $0.09 per share for
the first quarter of 2015, and $0.09 per share for each of the quarters through the first quarter of 2017. The Company increased
the quarterly dividend to $0.10 per share for each of the quarters from the second quarter of 2017 through the fourth quarter of
2017.
Other than share-based compensation which is disclosed in Note 17, "Share-Based Compensation", there were no additional
material transactions that affected stockholders' equity during the three years ended December 31, 2017.
14. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The table below displays the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.
Basic and Diluted EPS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to non-vested restricted shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic EPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anti-dilutive shares not included in the computation of diluted EPS (1) . .
$
$
$
98,387
(916)
97,471
$
$
101,423
20
101,443
0.96
0.96
229
$
92,349
(1,043)
91,306
$
$
79,797
13
79,810
1.14
1.14
494
$
82,064
(882)
81,182
77,059
13
77,072
1.05
1.05
800
(1)
This amount represents outstanding stock options for which the exercise price is greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock.
113
15. INCOME TAXES
Components of Income Tax Expense
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Current income tax expense:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total income tax expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
2017
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
93,540
104
93,644
(12,219)
8,142
(4,077)
89,567
$
$
46,748
790
47,538
(7,786)
6,419
(1,367)
46,171
$
$
18,524
2,326
20,850
12,048
4,849
16,897
37,747
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("federal income tax reform") was enacted on December 22, 2017. Among other things, the new law
(i) establishes a new, flat corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21%, (ii) eliminates the corporate alternative minimum tax
("AMT") and allows the use of any such carryforwards to offset regular tax liability for any taxable year, (iii) limits the deduction
for net interest expense incurred by U.S. corporations, (iv) allows businesses to immediately expense, for tax purposes, the cost
of new investments in certain qualified depreciable assets, (v) eliminates or reduces certain deductions related to meals and
entertainment expenses, (vi) modifies the limitation on excessive employee remuneration to eliminate the exception for
performance-based compensation and clarifies the definition of a covered employee, and (vii) limits the deductibility of deposit
insurance premiums. Federal income tax reform also significantly changes U.S. tax law related to foreign operations, however,
such changes do not currently impact the Company.
On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") to address the application of U.S.
GAAP in situations when an entity does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including
computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of federal income tax reform. SAB 118
provides guidance on accounting for the effects of federal income tax reform where the Company's determinations are incomplete
but the Company is able to determine a reasonable estimate. A final determination is required to be made within a measurement
period not to extend beyond one year from the enactment date of federal income tax reform.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company has completed the majority of its accounting for the tax effects of federal income tax
reform. The Company has recognized provisional adjustments for the revaluation of deferred tax assets to reflect the reduced rate
that will apply in future periods when these deferred taxes are settled and realized. Although the tax rate reduction is known, the
Company has not fully collected all of the necessary data to complete its analysis of the effect of federal income tax reform on
the underlying deferred taxes and as such, the amounts recorded as of December 31, 2017 are provisional. Any subsequent
adjustment to these amounts, if any, will be recorded to income tax expense during 2018.
Federal income tax expense and the related effective income tax rate are influenced by the amount of tax-exempt income derived
from investment securities and BOLI in relation to pre-tax income as well as state income taxes. 2017 current federal income tax
expense included $26.6 million for the fourth quarter revaluation of deferred tax assets as a result of federal income tax reform.
This revaluation adjustment remains preliminary and may change as the Company completes the accounting for the federal income
tax reform. State income tax expense and the related effective income tax rate are driven by both the amount of state tax-exempt
income in relation to pre-tax income and state tax rules for consolidated/combined reporting and sourcing of income and expense.
2017 current state income tax included a $2.8 million benefit recorded in the third quarter due to a change in the Illinois income
tax rate.
114
Components of Effective Tax Rate
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Statutory federal income tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
Revaluation of deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt income, net of interest expense
disallowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Amount
65,784
$
% of
Pretax
Income
35.0% $
Amount
48,482
% of
Pretax
Income
35.0% $
Amount
41,934
% of
Pretax
Income
35.0%
23,709
12.6
—
—
—
—
(5,065)
5,069
70
89,567
$
(2.7)
2.7
0.1
47.7% $
(5,439)
4,323
(1,195)
46,171
(3.9)
3.1
(0.9)
33.3% $
(6,752)
4,665
(2,100)
37,747
(5.6)
3.9
(1.8)
31.5%
The increase in income tax expense and the effective tax rate from the years ended December 31, 2016 to 2017 was due primarily
to higher pre-tax income subject to tax at statutory rates, the $26.6 million downward revaluation of deferred tax assets as a result
of federal income tax reform, partly offset by a $2.8 million benefit due to a change in the Illinois income tax rate. The increase
in income tax expense and the effective tax rate from the years ended December 31, 2015 to 2016 resulted primarily from an
increase in income subject to tax at statutory rates, partially offset by decreases in state statutory rates.
As of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company's retained earnings included an appropriation for an acquired thrift's tax
bad debt reserves of approximately $2.5 million for which no provision for federal or state income taxes has been made. If, in the
future, this portion of retained earnings were distributed as a result of the liquidation of the Company or its subsidiaries, federal
and state income taxes would be imposed at the then applicable rates.
115
Differences between the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities
result in temporary differences for which deferred tax assets and liabilities were recorded.
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback transaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity based compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal and state net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OREO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-equity based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AMT and other credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized losses on securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred loan fees and costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued retirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancellation of indebtedness income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect of adjustments related to other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred tax assets including adjustments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOL carryforwards available to offset future taxable income:
Federal gross NOL carryforwards, begin to expire in 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Illinois gross NOL carryforwards, begin to expire in 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Indiana gross NOL carryforwards, begin to expire in 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AMT credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
20,285
15,668
3,605
3,384
2,489
2,089
897
667
23
12,494
61,601
(4,169)
(3,517)
(1,660)
(641)
—
(2,449)
(12,436)
—
49,165
15,571
64,736
$
$
— $
188,995
16,174
410
30,399
28,133
5,228
388
—
4,336
6,060
90
18,320
10,997
103,951
(3,172)
(6,281)
(397)
(2,136)
(13,407)
(6,045)
(31,438)
—
72,513
27,694
100,207
574
26,342
1,003
—
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded net deferred tax assets of $41.5 million related to the Standard
acquisition and a measurement period adjustment related to finalizing the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in the NI Bancshares acquisition. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded net deferred tax assets of
$4.4 million related to the NI Bancshares acquisition and a measurement period adjustment related to finalizing the fair values of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Peoples acquisition.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company transferred certain loans into Real Estate Mortgage Investment
Conduit trusts which are classified as loans in the financial statements and as securities for tax purposes.
Net deferred tax assets are included in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Management believes that it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will be fully realized and no valuation allowance
is required.
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
The Company files a U.S. federal income tax return and state income tax returns in various states. Income tax returns filed by the
Company are no longer subject to examination by federal and state income tax authorities for years prior to 2014.
116
Rollforward of Unrecognized Tax Benefits
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,039
$
1,408
$
Additions for tax positions relating to the current year. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions for tax positions relating to prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions for tax positions relating to prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
845
13,389
(25)
640
—
(9)
912
480
37
(21)
Ending balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
16,248
$
2,039
$
1,408
Interest and penalties not included above (1):
Interest expense, net of tax effect, and penalties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Accrued interest and penalties, net of tax effect, at end of year . . . . . . .
$
118
191
$
49
73
20
24
(1)
Included in income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company does not anticipate that the amount of uncertain tax positions will significantly increase or decrease in the next
twelve months. Included in the balance as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 are tax positions totaling $12.9 million, $1.4
million and $936,000, respectively, which would favorably affect the Company's effective tax rate if recognized in future periods.
16. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Profit Sharing Plan
The Company has a defined contribution retirement savings plan (the "Profit Sharing Plan") that covers qualified employees who
meet certain eligibility requirements. During 2014, the Profit Sharing Plan was amended to give qualified employees the option
to increase contributions from 45% (15% for certain highly compensated employees) to 100% (including certain highly
compensated employees) of their pre-tax base salary through salary deductions under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
At the employees' direction, employee contributions are invested among a variety of investment alternatives. The amendment also
increased the Company's matching contribution from a maximum of 2% to 4% of the eligible employee's compensation. In addition,
pursuant to the amendment, the Company makes certain automatic and transition contributions. On an annual basis, the Company
automatically contributes 2% of the employee's eligible compensation regardless of voluntary contributions made by the employee.
Transition contributions of up to 4% were made through December 31, 2015 for certain employees who were active participants
in the defined benefit retirement plan (the "Pension Plan"), which was frozen in 2013. The amendment did not change the
discretionary profit sharing component of the Profit Sharing Plan, which permits the Company to distribute up to 15% of the
employee's compensation. The Company's matching and transition contributions vest immediately, while the automatic and
discretionary components vest over six years.
Profit Sharing Plan
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Profit sharing expense (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company dividends received by the Profit Sharing Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company shares held by the Profit Sharing Plan at the end of the year:
Number of shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
7,346
441
1,079,975
25,930
$
$
$
6,171
494
1,175,858
29,667
$
$
$
6,919
466
1,277,567
23,546
(1)
Included in retirement and other employee benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
117
Pension Plan
The Company sponsors the Pension Plan which provides for retirement benefits based on years of service and compensation levels
of the participants. The Pension Plan covers employees who met certain eligibility requirements and were hired before April 1,
2007, the date it was amended to eliminate new enrollment of new participants. During 2013, the Board approved an amendment
to freeze benefit accruals under the Pension Plan effective on January 1, 2014.
Actuarially determined pension costs are charged to current operations and included in retirement and other employee benefits in
the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company's funding policy is to contribute amounts to the Pension Plan that are
sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 plus additional
amounts as the Company deems appropriate.
Pension Plan Cost and Obligations
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Accumulated benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in projected benefit obligation
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in fair value of plan assets
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded status recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Noncurrent liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as a percent of
Accumulated benefit obligation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
into net periodic benefit cost in the next fiscal year
Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net amount expected to be recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average assumptions at the end of the year used to determine the
actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2017
67,923
68,959
—
1,712
(6,271)
4,240
(717)
67,923
65,189
7,958
(717)
(6,271)
66,159
(1,764)
$
$
$
$
$
$
— $
25,495
25,495
$
37.5%
38.5%
— $
561
561
$
2016
68,959
67,185
—
1,635
(3,136)
3,851
(576)
68,959
64,903
3,998
(576)
(3,136)
65,189
(3,770)
—
28,483
28,483
41.3%
43.7%
—
582
582
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.45%
3.86%
On December 31, 2015, the Company refined the calculation of the interest component of net periodic benefit expense for the
Pension Plan. Previously, the Company estimated the interest cost component utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate
derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the end of the period. Under the refined method, the Company
utilized a full yield curve approach to estimate the component by applying specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the
determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. The Company made this change to more closely match
118
the projected benefit cash flows and the corresponding yield curve spot rates, and to provide a more precise measurement of
interest costs. This change had no impact on the measurement of the Company's total benefit obligations recorded as of December
31, 2015. The Company accounted for this change as a change in estimate that is inseparable from a change in accounting principle,
and, accordingly, recognized its effect prospectively beginning in 2016.
To the extent the cumulative actuarial losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss exceed 10% of the greater of the
accumulated benefit obligation or the market-related value of the Pension Plan assets, it is the Company's policy to amortize the
Pension Plan's net actuarial losses into income over the average remaining life expectancy of the Pension Plan participants. Actuarial
losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2017 exceeded 10% of the accumulated benefit
obligation and the fair value of Pension Plan assets. The amortization of net actuarial losses is a component of the net periodic
benefit cost. Amortization of the net actuarial losses and prior service cost included in other comprehensive income (loss) is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company's future results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
Net Periodic Benefit Pension Cost
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,712
$
1,635
$
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3,802)
Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognized settlement loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net periodic cost (income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized as
a charge to other comprehensive income (loss)
Net loss for the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total unrealized gain (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total recognized in net periodic pension cost and other
comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net periodic
cost
591
—
2,480
981
(83)
3,071
2,988
(4,057)
571
—
1,338
(513)
(3,911)
1,909
(2,002)
2,334
(4,333)
367
—
2,254
622
(9,191)
2,621
(6,570)
$
2,007
$
(1,489)
$
(7,192)
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.86%
6.25%
3.99%
6.50%
3.60%
6.50%
Pension Plan Asset Allocation
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Target Allocation
Fair Value of Plan
Assets (1)
Percentage of Plan Assets
as of December 31,
2017
2016
Asset Category
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50 - 60%
30 - 48%
2 - 10%
$
$
39,954
22,734
3,471
66,159
60%
35%
5%
100%
60%
33%
7%
100%
(1) Additional information regarding the fair value of Pension Plan assets as of December 31, 2017 can be found in Note 21, "Fair Value."
The expected long-term rate of return on Pension Plan assets represents the average rate of return expected to be earned over the
period the benefits included in the benefit obligation are to be paid. In developing the expected rate of return, the Company
considers long-term returns based on historical market data and projections of future returns for each asset category, as well as
historical actual returns on the Pension Plan assets with the assistance of its independent actuarial consultant. Using this reference
data, the Company develops a forward-looking return expectation for each asset category and a weighted-average expected long-
term rate of return based on the target asset allocation.
119
The investment objective of the Pension Plan is to maximize the return on Pension Plan assets over a long-term horizon to satisfy
the Pension Plan obligations. In establishing its investment policies and asset allocation strategies, the Company considers expected
returns and the volatility associated with different strategies. The policy established by the Company's Retirement Plan Committee
provides for growth of capital with a moderate level of volatility by investing assets according to the target allocations stated above
and reallocating those assets as needed to stay within those allocations. Investments are weighted toward publicly traded securities.
Investment strategies that include alternative asset classes, such as private equity hedge funds and real estate, are generally avoided.
Under the advisement of a certified investment advisor, the Committee reviews the investment policy on a quarterly basis to
determine if any adjustments to the policy or investment strategy are necessary.
The following table presents estimated future pension benefit payments under the Pension Plan for retirees already receiving
benefits and future retirees, assuming they retire and begin receiving unreduced benefits as soon as they are eligible.
Estimated Future Pension Benefit Payments
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year ending December 31,
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023-2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
6,849
5,462
5,366
5,216
5,064
20,222
17. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Share-Based Plans
Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus Plan") – In 1989, the Board adopted the Omnibus Plan, which allows for the
grant of both incentive and non-statutory ("nonqualified") stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock
units, performance units, and performance shares to certain key employees.
From the inception of the Omnibus Plan through the end of 2008, certain key employees were granted nonqualified stock options.
The option exercise price is the average of the high and low price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. All options
have a term of 10 years from the grant date and are non-transferable except to immediate family members, family trusts, or
partnerships.
Since 2008, the Company has granted restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards instead of nonqualified stock options to
certain key employees. Both restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards vest over three years, with 50% vesting on the second
anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided the employee
remains employed by the Company during this period (subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances in the event of
a change-in-control or upon certain terminations of employment, as set forth in the applicable award agreement). The fair value
of the awards is determined based on the average of the high and low price of the Company's common stock on the grant date.
Since 2013, the Company has also granted performance shares to certain key employees. Recipients will earn performance shares
totaling between 0% and 200% of the number of performance shares granted based on achieving certain performance metrics.
Performance shares may be earned based on achieving an internal metric (core return on average tangible common equity) and
an external metric (relative total shareholder return) over a three year period. Each metric is weighted at 50% of the total award
opportunity. If earned, and assuming continued employment, the performance shares vest one-third at the completion of the three-
year performance period and one-third at the end of the first and second years thereafter. The fair value of the performance shares
that are dependent on the internal metric is determined based on the average of the high and low stock price on the grant date. An
estimate is made as to the number of shares expected to vest as a result of actual performance against the internal metric to determine
the amount of compensation expense to be recognized, which is re-evaluated quarterly. The fair value of the performance shares
that are dependent on the external metric is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the grant date assuming 100%
of the shares are earned and issued.
120
Nonemployee Directors Stock Plan (the "Directors Plan") – In 1997, the Board adopted the Directors Plan, which provides for
the grant of equity awards to non-management Board members. Until 2008, only nonqualified stock options were issued under
the Directors Plan. The exercise price of the options is equal to the average of the high and low price of the Company's common
stock on the grant date. All options have a term of 10 years from the grant date.
In 2008, the Company amended the Directors Plan to allow for the grant of restricted stock awards, among other items. The awards
are restricted as to transfer, but are not restricted as to voting rights. Dividends accrue and are paid at the vesting date. Both the
options and the restricted stock awards vest one year from the grant date subject to accelerated vesting in the event of retirement,
death, disability, or change-in-control, as defined in the Directors Plan. Since 2015, non-management members receive fully vested
shares of the Company's common stock rather than restricted stock.
Both the Omnibus Plan and the Directors Plan, and material amendments, were submitted to and approved by the stockholders of
the Company. The Company issues treasury shares to satisfy stock option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock, restricted
stock units, and performance share awards.
Shares of Common Stock Available Under Share-Based Plans
Omnibus Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Directors Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,631,641
481,250
1,835,929
104,782
As of December 31, 2017
Shares
Authorized
Shares Available
For Grant
Stock Options
Nonqualified Stock Option Transactions
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (1)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (2)
Number of
Options
Options outstanding beginning balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options outstanding ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
486
(254)
232
232
$
$
$
31.77
37.78
25.19
25.19
0.75
0.75
$
$
513
513
(1) Represents the average remaining contractual life in years.
(2) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value that would have been received by the option holders if they had exercised their
options on December 31, 2017. Intrinsic value equals the difference between the Company's average of the high and low stock price on the last trading
day of the year and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares. This amount will fluctuate with changes in the fair value of the
Company's common stock.
Stock Option Valuation Assumptions – The Company estimates the fair value of stock options at the grant date using a Black-
Scholes option-pricing model. No stock options were granted or exercised and no stock option award modifications were made
during the three years ended December 31, 2017.
121
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, and Performance Share Awards
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, and Performance Share Award Transactions
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Restricted Stock/Unit Awards
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares/Units
Performance Shares
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Non-vested awards beginning balance . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-vested awards ending balance . . . . . . . . . . .
989
$
477
(367)
(46)
1,053
$
16.95
24.71
16.79
19.80
20.36
408
$
145
(54)
(33)
466
$
15.78
24.71
16.79
19.80
18.16
In addition, non-management board members received, in the aggregate, 16,000 shares and 18,000 shares of common stock
during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Other Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, and Performance Share Award Information
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Weighted-average grant date fair value of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, and
performance share awards granted during the year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Total fair value of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, and performance share
awards vested during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit realized from the vesting/release of restricted stock, restricted
stock unit, and performance share awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24.71
$
17.28
$
16.95
13,760
12,231
4,007
2,529
7,615
2,368
No restricted stock, restricted stock unit, or performance share award modifications were made during the periods presented.
Compensation Expense
The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense based on the estimated fair value of the option or award at the grant
or modification date. Share-based compensation expense is included in salaries and wages in the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Effect of Recording Share-Based Compensation Expense
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Total share-based compensation expense (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average amortization period remaining (in years) . . .
$
$
$
2017
Years ended December 31,
2016
2015
11,223
$
7,879
$
4,601
6,622
13,266
1.3
$
$
3,152
4,727
9,990
1.3
$
$
7,242
2,962
4,280
8,644
1.4
(1) Comprised of restricted stock, restricted stock unit, and performance share awards expense.
122
18. REGULATORY AND CAPITAL MATTERS
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory requirements that impose restrictions on cash, loans or advances,
and dividends. The Bank is also required to maintain reserves against deposits. Reserves are held either in the form of vault cash
or noninterest-bearing balances maintained with the FRB and are based on the average daily balances and statutory reserve ratios
prescribed by the type of deposit account. Reserve balances totaling $121.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and $85.4 million
as of December 31, 2016 were maintained in accordance with these requirements.
Under current Federal Reserve regulations, the Bank is limited in the amount it may loan or advance to First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.
on an unconsolidated basis (the "Parent Company") and its non-bank subsidiaries. Loans or advances to a single subsidiary may
not exceed 10%, and loans to all subsidiaries may not exceed 20%, of the Bank's capital stock and surplus. Loans from subsidiary
banks to non-bank subsidiaries, including the Parent Company, are also required to be collateralized.
The principal source of cash flow for the Parent Company is dividends from the Bank. Various federal and state banking regulations
and capital guidelines limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to the Parent Company. Without prior regulatory
approval and while maintaining its well-capitalized status, the Bank can initiate aggregate dividend payments in 2018 of $107.8
million plus its net profits for 2018, as defined by statute, up to the date of any such dividend declaration. Future payment of
dividends by the Bank depends on individual regulatory capital requirements and levels of profitability.
The Company and the Bank are also subject to various capital requirements set up and administered by federal banking agencies.
Under capital adequacy guidelines, the Company and the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures
given the risk levels of assets and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices ("risk-weighted
assets"). The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators regarding components
of capital and assets, risk weightings, and other factors.
The Federal Reserve, the primary regulator of the Company and the Bank, establishes minimum capital requirements that must
be met by the Company and the Bank. As defined in the regulations, quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total capital to risk-weighted
assets, Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") to risk-weighted assets, and Tier 1 capital to adjusted
average assets. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in actions by regulators that could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial statements.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank
was "well-capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that
management believes would change the Bank's classification.
123
The following table outlines the Company's and the Bank's measures of capital as of the dates presented and the capital guidelines
established by the Federal Reserve for the Company and the Bank to be categorized as adequately capitalized and the Bank to be
categorized as "well-capitalized."
Summary of Regulatory Capital Ratios
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Actual
Adequately
Capitalized
To Be Well-Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Capital
Ratio %
Capital
Ratio %
Capital
Ratio %
As of December 31, 2017
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,448,124
1,300,809
12.15
10.95
$1,102,634
1,099,133
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,204,468
1,204,080
CET1 to risk-weighted assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,153,939
1,204,080
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,204,468
1,204,080
As of December 31, 2016
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
10.10
10.13
9.68
10.13
8.99
9.10
864,227
861,482
685,421
683,245
536,200
529,147
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,225,529
1,043,482
12.23
10.73
$ 864,176
838,741
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
991,873
956,399
CET1 to risk-weighted assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
941,315
956,399
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Midwest Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
991,873
956,399
9.90
9.83
9.39
9.83
8.99
8.76
663,788
644,251
513,496
498,383
441,473
436,560
N/A – Not applicable.
9.250
9.250
7.250
7.250
5.750
5.750
4.000
4.000
8.625
8.625
6.625
6.625
5.125
5.125
4.000
4.000
N/A
$1,188,252
N/A
10.00
N/A
950,601
N/A
772,364
N/A
661,434
N/A
8.00
N/A
6.50
N/A
5.00
N/A
$ 972,454
N/A
10.00
N/A
777,963
N/A
632,095
N/A
545,700
N/A
8.00
N/A
6.50
N/A
5.00
In July of 2013, the Federal Reserve published final rules (the "Basel III Capital Rules") that revise the regulatory capital rules to
incorporate certain revisions by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The phase-in period for the final rules began for
the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with the entire requirements of the final rules phased in on January 1,
2019.
The Basel III Capital Rules, among other things (i) introduced a new capital measure called CET1, (ii) specified that Tier 1 capital
consists of CET1 and "Additional Tier 1 Capital" instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii) narrowly defined CET1 by
requiring that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of
capital, and (iv) expanded the scope of the deductions/adjustments compared to existing regulations. Bank holding companies
with less than $15 billion in consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009, such as the Company, are permitted to include trust-
preferred securities in Additional Tier 1 Capital. This treatment is permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 capital even if the Company
should ever exceed $15 billion in consolidated assets due to organic growth. Should the Company exceed $15 billion in consolidated
assets as the result of a merger or acquisition, then the Tier 1 treatment of its outstanding trust-preferred securities will be phased
124
out, but those securities will be treated as Tier 2 capital. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $50.7 million of trust-
preferred securities included in Tier 1 capital.
When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules will require the Company and the Bank to maintain the
following:
• A minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% "capital conservation buffer" (resulting
in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation).
• A minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (resulting
in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation).
• A minimum ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital
conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation).
• A minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets.
The Basel III Capital Rules also provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1 to be phased-in over a four-
year period through January 1, 2019 (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). In November
of 2017, the Federal Reserve issued a final rule that retained certain existing transition provisions related to deductions from and
adjustments to CET1. Examples of these include the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets depending on
future taxable income, and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that
any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the Basel III
Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive items are included for purposes of determining regulatory
capital ratios; however, the Company and the Bank made a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items.
Finally, the Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories
from the prior four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of
categories depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities to 600%
for certain equity exposures, resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories.
The Company and the Bank believe they would meet all capital adequacy requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules on a
fully phased-in basis as if such requirements were currently in effect as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
In September of 2017, the federal bank regulators proposed to revise and simplify the capital treatment for certain deferred tax
assets, mortgage servicing assets, investments in non-consolidated financial entities and minority interests for banking
organizations, such as the Company and the Bank, that are not subject to the advanced approaches framework. In November of
2017, the federal banking regulators revised the Basel III Rules to extend the current transitional treatment of these items for non-
advanced approaches banking organizations until the September 2017 proposal is finalized. The September 2017 proposal would
also change the capital treatment of certain commercial real estate loans under the standardized approach, which the Company
and the Bank use to calculate their capital ratios.
In December of 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis
regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as "Basel IV"). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel
Committee's standardized approach for credit risk (including the recalibration of risk weights and introducing new capital
requirements for certain "unconditionally cancellable commitments," such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new
standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the Basel framework, these standards will generally be effective on
January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing in through January 1, 2027. Under the current U.S. capital rules, operational
risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company or the Bank.
The impact of Basel IV on the Company and the Bank will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank
regulators.
125
19. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions as part of its overall interest rate risk management
strategy. The significant accounting policies related to derivative instruments and hedging activities are presented in Note 1,
"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
Fair Value Hedges
The Company hedges the fair value of fixed rate commercial real estate loans using interest rate swaps through which the Company
pays fixed amounts and receives variable amounts. These derivative contracts are designated as fair value hedges.
Fair Value Hedges
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Gross notional amount outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liability fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average maturity (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of derivative (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
(1)
This amount represents the fair value if credit risk related contingent features were triggered.
As of December 31,
2016
2017
5,458
(101)
3.38%
5.96%
0.84
110
$
$
5,958
(282)
2.63%
5.96%
1.84
296
Hedge ineffectiveness is recognized in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, gains or losses related to fair value hedge ineffectiveness were not material.
Cash Flow Hedges
As of December 31, 2017, the Company hedged $980.0 million of certain corporate variable rate loans using interest rate swaps
through which the Company receives fixed amounts and pays variable amounts. The Company also hedged $980.0 million of
borrowed funds using forward starting interest rate swaps through which the Company receives variable amounts and pays fixed
amounts. These transactions allow the Company to add stability to net interest income and manage its exposure to interest rate
movements.
Forward starting interest rate swaps totaling $415.0 million began on various dates between June of 2015 and February of 2017,
and mature between June of 2019 and February of 2020. The remaining forward starting interest rate swaps totaling $565.0 million
begin on various dates between February of 2018 and February of 2020 and mature between February of 2020 and April of 2022.
The weighted-average fixed interest rate to be paid on these interest rate swaps that have not yet begun was 1.96% as of December 31,
2017. These derivative contracts are designated as cash flow hedges.
Cash Flow Hedges
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Gross notional amount outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative asset fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liability fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average maturity (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31,
2016
2017
$ 1,470,000
$ 1,960,000
5,402
3,989
(7,390)
(10,219)
1.37%
1.58%
1.11%
1.61%
2.83
2.25
The effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss on an after-tax
basis and is subsequently reclassified to interest income or expense in the period that the forecasted hedged item impacts earnings.
Hedge effectiveness is determined using a regression analysis at the inception of the hedge relationship and on an ongoing basis.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no material gains or losses related to cash flow hedge ineffectiveness.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company estimates that $1.6 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
loss as an increase to interest income over the next twelve months.
126
Other Derivative Instruments
The Company also enters into derivative transactions through capital market products with its commercial customers and
simultaneously enters into an offsetting interest rate derivative transaction with third-parties. These transactions allow the
Company's customers to effectively convert a variable rate loan into a fixed rate loan. Due to the offsetting nature of these
transactions, the Company does not apply hedge accounting treatment. The Company's credit exposure on these derivative
transactions results primarily from counterparty credit risk. The credit valuation adjustment ("CVA") is a fair value adjustment to
the derivative to account for this risk. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company's credit exposure was fully secured by
the underlying collateral on customer loans and mitigated through netting arrangements with third-parties, therefore, no CVA was
recorded. Capital market products income related to commercial customer derivative instruments of $8.2 million, $10.0 million,
and $4.8 million was recorded in noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Other Derivative Instruments
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Gross notional amount outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative asset fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liability fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of derivative (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(1)
This amount represents the fair value if credit risk related contingent factors were triggered.
As of December 31,
2016
2017
1,656,612
2,665,358
13,478
17,079
(13,478)
(14,930)
13,753
15,059
$
The Company occasionally enters into risk participation agreements with counterparty banks to transfer or assume a portion of
the credit risk related to customer transactions. The amounts of these instruments were not material for any period presented. The
Company had no other derivative instruments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company does not enter into derivative
transactions for purely speculative purposes.
Credit Risk
Derivative instruments are inherently subject to credit risk, which represents the Company's risk of loss when the counterparty to
a derivative contract fails to perform according to the terms of the agreement. Credit risk is managed by limiting and collateralizing
the aggregate amount of net unrealized losses by transaction, monitoring the size and the maturity structure of the derivatives, and
applying uniform credit standards. Company policy establishes limits on credit exposure to any single counterparty. In addition,
the Company established bilateral collateral agreements with derivative counterparties that provide for exchanges of marketable
securities or cash to collateralize either party's net losses above a stated minimum threshold. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
these collateral agreements covered 100% of the fair value of the Company's outstanding fair value hedges. Derivative assets and
liabilities are presented gross, rather than net, of pledged collateral amounts.
127
Certain derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements with counterparties. The Company records these
transactions at their gross fair values and does not offset derivative assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition. The following table presents the fair value of the Company's derivatives and offsetting positions as of December 31,
2017 and 2016.
Fair Value of Offsetting Derivatives
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Gross amounts recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
21,068
$
25,250
$
18,880
$
21,150
Less: amounts offset in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net amount presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross amounts not offset in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition:
Offsetting derivative positions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash collateral pledged . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net credit exposure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
—
—
—
—
21,068
25,250
18,880
21,150
(16,880)
—
4,188
$
(16,880)
(8,370)
— $
(10,889)
—
7,991
$
(10,889)
(10,261)
—
(1)
Included in other assets or other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company's derivative instruments generally contained provisions that require the
Company's debt to remain above a certain credit rating by each of the major credit rating agencies or that the Company maintain
certain capital levels. If the Company's debt were to fall below that credit rating or the Company's capital were to fall below the
required levels, it would be in violation of those provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could terminate
the swap transaction and demand cash settlement of the derivative instrument in an amount equal to the derivative liability fair
value. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company was in compliance with these provisions.
128
20. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES, AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Credit Commitments and Guarantees
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into a variety of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet
the financing needs of its customers and to conduct lending activities, including commitments to extend credit and standby and
commercial letters of credit. These instruments involve elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized
in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Contractual or Notional Amounts of Financial Instruments
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
$
1,729,426
$
1,522,152
377,551
514,973
244,222
397,423
426,384
214,943
2,560,902
100,430
Commitments to extend credit:
Commercial, industrial, and agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Home equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other commitments (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
$
Letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,866,172
128,801
$
$
(1) Other commitments includes installment and overdraft protection program commitments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to a customer, subject to contractual terms and covenants. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, variable interest rates, and fee requirements, when applicable.
Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash flow requirements.
In the event of a customer's non-performance, the Company's credit loss exposure is equal to the contractual amount of the
commitments. The credit risk is essentially the same as extending loans to customers for the full contractual amount. The Company
uses the same credit policies for credit commitments as its loans and minimizes exposure to credit loss through various collateral
requirements.
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party.
Letters of credit generally are contingent on the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the contract with the
third-party and are often issued in favor of a municipality where construction is taking place to ensure the borrower adequately
completes the construction. Commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate transactions between a customer and a third-party
based on agreed upon terms.
The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under letters of credit arrangements are equal to the contractual
amount of the commitment. If a commitment is funded, the Company may seek recourse through the liquidation of the underlying
collateral, including real estate, production plants and property, marketable securities, or receipt of cash.
As a result of the sale of certain 1-4 family mortgage loans, the Company is contractually obligated to repurchase early payment
default loans or loans that do not meet underwriting requirements at recorded value. In accordance with the sales agreements,
there is no limitation to the maximum potential future payments or expiration of the Company's recourse obligation. There were
no material loan repurchases during the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, there were certain legal proceedings pending against the Company and its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2017. While the outcome of any legal proceeding is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available,
the Company's management does not expect that any liabilities arising from pending legal matters will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
129
21. FAIR VALUE
Fair value represents the amount expected to be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in its principal or most
advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In accordance with fair value
accounting guidance, the Company measures, records, and reports various types of assets and liabilities at fair value on either a
recurring or non-recurring basis in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Those assets and liabilities are presented
below in the sections titled "Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis" and "Assets and
Liabilities Required to be Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis."
Other assets and liabilities are not required to be measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition,
but must be disclosed at fair value. See the "Fair Value Measurements of Other Financial Instruments" section of this note. Any
aggregation of the estimated fair values presented in this note does not represent the value of the Company.
Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the Company uses various valuation methodologies and assumptions to estimate
fair value. GAAP provides a three-tiered fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy is
defined as follows:
• Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2 – Observable inputs other than level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar instruments, quoted prices in
markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
• Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value
of the assets or liabilities. These inputs require significant management judgment or estimation, some of which use model-
based techniques and may be internally developed.
Assets and liabilities are assigned to a level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of significant input used to
measure fair value. Assets and liabilities may change levels within the fair value hierarchy due to market conditions or other
circumstances. Those transfers are recognized on the date of the event that prompted the transfer. There were no transfers of assets
or liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the periods
presented.
130
Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table provides the fair value for assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in
the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition by level in the fair value hierarchy.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2017
Level 2
Level 1
Level 3
As of December 31, 2016
Level 2
Level 1
Level 3
Assets
Trading securities:
Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,685
$
— $
— $
1,645
$
— $
Mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,762
20,447
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. treasury securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46,345
—
—
—
U.S. agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CMOs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MBSs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Municipal securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CDOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
156,847
— 1,095,186
—
—
—
—
369,543
208,991
—
7,297
Total securities available-for-sale . . . .
Mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") (1) . .
Derivative assets (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46,345
1,837,864
—
—
—
21,068
Liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5,894
—
16,275
17,920
48,541
—
—
—
—
183,637
— 1,047,446
—
—
—
—
332,655
270,846
—
3,065
48,541
1,837,649
—
—
—
18,880
Derivative liabilities (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
25,250
$
— $
— $
21,150
$
(1)
(2)
Included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33,260
—
33,260
6,120
—
—
The following sections describe the specific valuation techniques and inputs used to measure financial assets and liabilities at fair
value.
Trading Securities
The Company's trading securities consist of diversified investment securities held in a grantor trust and are invested in money
market and mutual funds. The fair value of these money market and mutual funds is based on quoted market prices in active
exchange markets and is classified in level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Securities Available-for-Sale
The Company's securities available-for-sale are primarily fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but may
be traded in active markets. The fair values for these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets or market prices for
similar securities obtained from external pricing services or dealer market participants and are classified in level 2 in the fair value
hierarchy. The fair value of U.S. treasury securities is based on quoted market prices in active exchange markets and is classified
in level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Quarterly, the Company evaluates the methodologies used by its external pricing services to
estimate the fair value of these securities to determine whether the valuations represent an exit price in the Company's principal
markets.
CDOs were classified in level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016. The Company liquidated all of its remaining
CDOs during 2017. The Company estimated the fair values for each CDO using discounted cash flow analyses with the assistance
of a structured credit valuation firm. This methodology was based on a credit analysis and historical financial data for each of the
issuers underlying the CDOs (the "Issuers"). These estimates are highly subjective and sensitive to several significant, unobservable
inputs. The cash flows for each Issuer were then discounted to present values using LIBOR plus an adjustment to reflect the impact
131
of market factors. Finally, the discounted cash flows for each Issuer were aggregated to derive the estimated fair value for the
specific CDO.
The following table presents the ranges of significant, unobservable inputs calculated using the weighted average of the Issuers
used by the Company as of December 31, 2016.
Significant Unobservable Inputs Used in the Valuation of CDOs
As of
December 31, 2016
Probability of prepayment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.0% - 10.9%
Probability of default . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16.7% - 46.8%
Loss given default . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
93.3% - 98.9%
Probability of deferral cure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.6% - 100.0%
The impact of changes in these key inputs could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement for each CDO.
The timing of the default, the magnitude of the default, and the timing and magnitude of the cure probability are directly interrelated.
Defaults that occur sooner and/or are greater than anticipated have a negative impact on the valuation. In addition, a high cure
probability assumption has a positive effect on the fair value, and, if a cure event takes place sooner than anticipated, the impact
on the valuation is also favorable.
A rollforward of the carrying value of CDOs for the three years ended December 31, 2017 is presented in the following table.
Carrying Value of CDOs
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
33,260
$
31,529
$
33,774
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paydowns and sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
14,421
(47,681)
—
2,337
(606)
Ending balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
33,260
$
—
(2,030)
(215)
31,529
(1)
Included in unrealized holding gains (losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company services loans for others totaling $607.0 million and $640.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
These loans are owned by third-parties and are not included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The Company
determines the fair value of MSRs by estimating the present value of expected future cash flows associated with the mortgage
loans being serviced and classifies them in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents the ranges of significant,
unobservable inputs used by the Company to determine the fair value of MSRs as December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Significant Unobservable Inputs Used in the Valuation of MSRs
Prepayment speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maturity (months) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31,
2017
4.2% - 13.1%
6 - 92
9.5% - 12.0%
2016
7.7% - 22.8%
12 - 103
9.5% - 13.0%
The impact of changes in these key inputs could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement for MSRs.
Significant increases in expected prepayment speeds and discount rates have negative impacts on the valuation. Higher maturity
assumptions have a favorable effect on the estimated fair value.
132
A rollforward of the carrying value of MSRs for the three years ended December 31, 2017 is presented in the following table.
Carrying Value of MSRs
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions from acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New MSRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total (losses) gains included in earnings (1):
Changes in valuation inputs and assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other changes in fair value (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contractual servicing fees earned during the year (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total amount of loans being serviced for the benefit of
others at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
6,120
—
673
(41)
(858)
5,894
1,536
$
$
$
1,853
3,092
1,263
610
(698)
6,120
1,312
$
$
$
1,728
—
342
(11)
(206)
1,853
546
607,016
640,530
242,915
(1)
(2)
(3)
Included in mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income and related to assets held as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Primarily represents changes in expected future cash flows over time due to payoffs and paydowns.
Included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities
The Company enters into interest rate swaps and derivative transactions with commercial customers. These derivative transactions
are executed in the dealer market, and pricing is based on market quotes obtained from the counterparties. The market quotes were
developed using market observable inputs, which primarily include LIBOR. Therefore, derivatives are classified in level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy. For its derivative assets and liabilities, the Company also considers non-performance risk, including the
likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties, when evaluating whether the market quotes from the counterparties are
representative of an exit price.
Pension Plan Assets
Although Pension Plan assets are not consolidated in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, they are
required to be measured at fair value on an annual basis. The fair value of Pension Plan assets is presented in the following table
by level in the fair value hierarchy.
Annual Fair Value Measurements for Pension Plan Assets
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2017
Level 2
Total
Level 1
As of December 31, 2016
Level 2
Total
Level 1
Pension plan assets:
Mutual funds (1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. government and government
agency securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common trust funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total pension plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
41,002
$
— $
41,002
$
29,071
$
— $
29,071
3,678
—
—
—
44,680
$
9,397
9,171
—
2,911
21,479
$
13,075
9,171
—
2,911
66,159
$
5,957
—
7,526
—
42,554
$
7,947
7,010
—
7,678
22,635
$
13,904
7,010
7,526
7,678
65,189
$
(1)
Includes mutual funds, money market funds, cash, cash equivalents, and accrued interest.
Mutual funds, certain U.S. government agency securities, and common stocks are based on quoted market prices in active exchange
markets and classified in level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Corporate bonds and certain U.S. government and government agency
securities are valued at quoted prices from independent sources that are based on observable market trades or observable prices
for similar bonds where a price for the identical bond is not observable and, therefore, are classified in level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy. Common trust funds are valued at quoted redemption values on the last business day of the Pension Plan's fiscal year
133
and are classified in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. There were no Pension Plan assets classified in level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following table provides the fair value for each class of assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a non-
recurring basis in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition by level in the fair value hierarchy.
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2017
Level 2
Level 1
Level 3
As of December 31, 2016
Level 2
Level 1
Level 3
Collateral-dependent impaired loans (1) .
OREO (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held-for-sale (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held-for-sale (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
—
—
—
— $
—
—
—
$
33,240
12,340
21,098
2,208
— $
—
—
—
— $
—
—
—
22,019
8,624
10,484
4,075
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Includes impaired loans with charge-offs and impaired loans with a specific reserve during the periods presented.
Includes OREO with fair value adjustments subsequent to initial transfer that occurred during the periods presented.
Included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Included in premises, furniture, and equipment in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Collateral-Dependent Impaired Loans
Certain collateral-dependent impaired loans are subject to fair value adjustments to reflect the difference between the carrying
value of the loan and the value of the underlying collateral. The fair values of collateral-dependent impaired loans are primarily
determined by current appraised values of the underlying collateral. Based on the age and/or type, appraisals may be adjusted in
the range of 0% to 15%. In certain cases, an internal valuation may be used when the underlying collateral is located in areas
where comparable sales data is limited or unavailable. Accordingly, collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified in level 3
of the fair value hierarchy.
Collateral-dependent impaired loans for which the fair value is greater than the recorded investment are not measured at fair value
in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and are not included in this disclosure.
OREO
The fair value of OREO is measured using the current appraised value of the properties. In certain circumstances, a current appraisal
may not be available or may not represent an accurate measurement of the property's fair value due to outdated market information
or other factors. In these cases, the fair value is determined based on the lower of the (i) most recent appraised value, (ii) broker
price opinion, (iii) current listing price, or (iv) signed sales contract. Given these valuation methods, OREO is classified in level 3
of the fair value hierarchy.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Loans held-for-sale consists of 1-4 family mortgage loans, which were originated with the intent to sell as of December 31, 2017
and 2016. These loans were recorded in the held-for-sale category at the contract price, which approximates fair value, and,
accordingly, are classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Assets Held-for-Sale
As of December 31, 2017, assets held-for-sale consists of former branches that are no longer in operation and parcels of land
previously purchased for expansion. These properties are being actively marketed and were transferred into the held-for-sale
category at their fair value, as determined by current appraisals. Based on these valuation methods, they are classified in level 3
of the fair value hierarchy.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are subject to annual impairment testing, which requires a significant degree of management
judgment. If the testing had resulted in impairment, the Company would have classified goodwill and other intangible assets as a
level 3 non-recurring fair value measurement. Additional information regarding goodwill, other intangible assets, and impairment
policies can be found in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," and Note 9, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets."
134
Financial Instruments Not Required to be Measured at Fair Value
For certain financial instruments that are not required to be measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition, the Company must disclose the estimated fair values and the level within the fair value hierarchy as shown in the
following table.
Fair Value Measurements of Other Financial Instruments
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks. . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held-to-maturity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB and FRB stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in BOLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other interest-earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowed funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2017
As of December 31, 2016
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Level
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
$
192,800
153,770
13,760
69,708
10,345,397
279,900
45,261
228
$
192,800
153,770
12,013
69,708
10,059,992
279,900
45,261
228
$
155,055
107,093
22,291
59,131
8,172,584
219,746
34,384
834
$
155,055
107,093
18,212
59,131
7,973,845
219,746
34,384
834
$ 11,053,325
714,884
195,170
4,704
$ 11,038,819
714,884
198,806
4,704
$ 8,828,603
879,008
194,603
3,416
$ 8,820,572
879,008
197,888
3,416
Management uses various methodologies and assumptions to determine the estimated fair values of the financial instruments in
the table above. The fair value estimates are made at a discrete point in time based on relevant market information and consider
management's judgments regarding future expected economic conditions, loss experience, and specific risk characteristics of the
financial instruments.
Short-Term Financial Assets and Liabilities – For financial instruments with a shorter-term or with no stated maturity, prevailing
market rates, and limited credit risk, the carrying amounts approximate fair value. Those financial instruments include cash and
due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, accrued interest receivable, and accrued interest payable.
Securities Held-to-Maturity – The fair value of securities held-to-maturity is estimated using the present value of expected future
cash flows of the remaining maturities of the securities.
FHLB and FRB Stock – The carrying amounts approximate fair value as the stock is non-marketable.
Loans – Loans includes the FDIC indemnification asset and net loans, which consists of loans held-for-investment, acquired loans,
and the allowance for loan losses. The fair value of loans is estimated using the present value of the expected future cash flows
of the remaining maturities of the loans. Prepayment assumptions that consider the Company's historical experience and current
economic and lending conditions were included. The discount rate was based on the LIBOR yield curve with adjustments for
liquidity and credit risk inherent in the loans.
Investment in BOLI – The fair value of BOLI approximates the carrying amount as both are based on each policy's respective
CSV, which is the amount the Company would receive from liquidation of these investments. The CSV is derived from monthly
reports provided by the managing brokers and is determined using the Company's initial insurance premium and earnings of the
underlying assets, offset by management fees.
Other Interest-Earning Assets – The fair value of other interest-earning assets is estimated using the present value of the expected
future cash flows of the remaining maturities of the assets.
Deposits – The fair values disclosed for demand deposits, savings deposits, NOW accounts, and money market deposits are equal
to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The fair value for fixed-rate time deposits
was estimated using the expected future cash flows discounted based on the LIBOR yield curve, plus or minus the spread associated
with current pricing.
135
Borrowed Funds – The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the agreements based on maturities using the
rates currently offered for FHLB advances of similar remaining maturities adjusted for prepayment penalties that would be incurred
if the borrowings were paid off on the measurement date. The carrying amounts of securities sold under agreements to repurchase
approximate their fair value due to their short-term nature.
Senior and Subordinated Debt – The fair values of senior and subordinated notes are estimated based on quoted market prices
of similar instruments. The fair values of junior subordinated debentures are estimated based on quoted market prices of comparable
securities when available, or by discounting the expected future cash flows at market interest rates.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Letters of Credit – The Company estimated the fair value of lending commitments
outstanding to be immaterial based on (i) the limited interest rate exposure of the commitments outstanding due to their variable
nature, (ii) the short-term nature of the commitment periods, (iii) termination clauses provided in the agreements, and (iv) the
market rate of fees charged.
22. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company, through the Bank, makes loans to and has transactions with certain of its directors and executive officers. All of
these loans and transactions were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral requirements, for
comparable transactions with unrelated persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present unfavorable
features. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, loans to directors and executive officers were not greater than 5% of
stockholders' equity.
136
23. CONDENSED PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following represents the condensed financial statements of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., the Parent Company.
Statements of Financial Condition
(Parent Company only)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Assets
Cash and due from banks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Senior and subordinated debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders' equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
120,812
1,952,414
43,606
2,116,832
195,170
56,788
1,864,874
2,116,832
$
$
$
$
140,217
1,279,065
139,060
1,558,342
194,603
106,659
1,257,080
1,558,342
Statements of Income
(Parent Company only)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Income
Dividends from subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities transactions and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Expenses
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed income
(loss) of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before equity in undistributed income (loss) of subsidiaries . . . . .
Equity in undistributed income (loss) of subsidiaries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to non-vested restricted shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income applicable to common shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
74,091
2,211
(1,372)
74,930
12,428
20,978
9,126
42,532
32,398
14,851
47,249
51,138
98,387
(916)
97,471
$
$
86,791
2,188
215
89,194
12,477
16,104
7,110
35,691
53,503
12,878
66,381
25,968
92,349
(1,043)
91,306
$
$
127,000
2,164
584
129,748
12,545
14,624
6,003
33,172
96,576
11,950
108,526
(26,462)
82,064
(882)
81,182
137
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
$
98,387
$
92,349
$
82,064
(51,138)
9
1,523
11,223
349
18,667
(52,377)
26,643
—
42,516
(119)
(47,364)
(4,967)
—
—
—
(37,129)
(3,952)
(41,081)
(19,405)
140,217
120,812
(25,968)
2
—
7,879
(197)
(75,104)
74,571
73,532
(14)
601
—
(14,905)
(14,318)
146,484
(153,500)
—
(29,198)
(2,476)
(38,690)
20,524
119,693
140,217
$
$
26,462
7
(1)
7,242
(406)
23,699
(17,132)
121,935
—
310
(5)
(16,047)
(15,742)
—
—
(120)
(27,036)
(2,890)
(30,046)
76,147
43,546
119,693
534,090
$
54,896
$
—
Statements of Cash Flows
(Parent Company only)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Equity in undistributed (income) loss of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of premises, furniture, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities losses (gains) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefit (expense) related to share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net decrease (increase) in other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investing Activities
Purchases of securities available-for-sale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales and maturities of securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of premises, furniture, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash paid for acquisitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing Activities
Net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for the retirement of senior and subordinated debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Common stock issued for acquisitions, net of issuance costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
138
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report (the "Evaluation Date"), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's President and Chief Executive
Officer and its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation,
the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the
Evaluation Date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting
during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is
designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and Board regarding the preparation and fair presentation
of published financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Accordingly,
even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation
and presentation.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in "Internal Control – Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on this
assessment, management determined that the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 is
effective based on the specified criteria.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company's consolidated financial
statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2017. The report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2017, is included in this Item under the heading "Attestation Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm."
139
Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated statements of financial condition of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes, of the Company and our report dated February
28, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2018
140
None.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company's executive officers are elected annually by the Board, and the Bank's executive officers are elected annually by
the Bank's Board of Directors. Certain information regarding the Company's and the Bank's executive officers is set forth below.
Position or Employment for Past Five Years
Name (Age)
Michael L. Scudder (57) Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors since November of 2017; President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2008; Chairman since 2011 and Vice
Chairman from 2010 to 2011 of the Bank's Board of Directors; Chief Executive Officer
of the Bank since 2010 and prior thereto, President, Chief Operating Officer and various
other senior management positions with the Bank.
Mark G. Sander (59)
Patrick S. Barrett (54)
Jo Ann Boylan (55)
Kathleen S. Carroll (49)
Nicholas J. Chulos (58)
Robert P. Diedrich (54)
James P. Hotchkiss (61)
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank and Senior Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since 2011; Vice Chairman of the Bank's
Board of Directors since 2014; prior thereto, Executive Vice President and head of
Commercial Banking for Associated Banc-Corp and its subsidiary, Associated Bank,
from 2009 to 2011.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank
since 2017; prior thereto, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
at Fulton Financial Corporation from 2014 to 2016; prior thereto, Chief Financial Officer
of Wholesale Banking at SunTrust; prior thereto, in numerous leadership positions at
JPMorgan Chase & Co, and before that, Partner in the Assurance Services practice of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
Executive Vice President and Chief Information and Operations Officer of the Bank
since 2016; prior thereto, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at MB
Financial.
Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company since
December of 2017; prior thereto, Vice President and Global Head of Talent Acquisition
and Global HR Lead for M&A at Aon Corporation from 2014 to 2017 and before that
in numerous leadership positions at Aon Corporation.
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary of the Company
and the Bank since 2012; prior thereto, Partner of Krieg DeVault, LLP.
Executive Vice President and Director of Wealth Management of the Bank since 2011.
Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Company and the Bank since 2004.
Jeff C. Newcom (45)
Thomas M. Prame (48)
Michael W. Jamieson (60) Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Banking of the Company since
2016: prior thereto, Senior Vice President and Market Executive at Bank of America
Merrill Lynch.
Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Company since 2016; prior
thereto, Chief Compliance and Enterprise Risk Management Officer at Fulton Financial
Corporation since 2014; prior thereto, Associate Director at Protiviti.
Executive Vice President and Director of Strategic Planning and Consumer Banking
since 2016; prior thereto, Executive Vice President and Director of Retail Banking of
the Bank since 2012; prior thereto, Executive Vice President, Sales and Service at RBS/
Citizen's Bank.
Senior Vice President of the Company and Bank and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Bank since 2014; prior thereto, Vice President and Financial Reporting Manager for the
Company since 2013; prior thereto, Director in the Assurance Services practice of
McGladrey LLP.
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank since 2013; prior thereto,
Executive Vice President and Commercial Chief Credit Officer for Busey Bank.
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing and Communications Officer of the
Company since January of 2018; prior thereto, Managing Partner at Schafer Condon
Carter.
Michael C. Spitler (64)
Angela L. Putnam (39)
James V. Stadler (54)
Executive
Officer
Since
2002
2011
2017
2016
2017
2012
2004
2004
2016
2016
2012
2015
2013
2018
Additional information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating
to its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
141
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to its
2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required in response to this item, in addition to the information presented below under "Equity Compensation
Plans," will be contained in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held on May 16, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2017, relating to equity compensation plans of the Company
pursuant to which options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, or other rights to acquire shares may be
granted from time to time.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of securities to
be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
excluding securities
reflected in column (a)
(c)
566,614
5,642
572,256
$
$
25.19
17.77
25.12
1,940,711
—
1,940,711
Equity Compensation Plan Category
Approved by security holders (1) . . . . .
Not approved by security holders (2). .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1)
Includes all outstanding options and restricted stock, restricted stock unit, and performance share awards under the Company's Omnibus Stock and
Incentive Plan and the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Plan (the "Plans"). Additional information and details about the Plans are also disclosed in
Notes 1 and 17 of "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance
shares that do not vest or are not earned, as well as the shares underlying options that expire unexercised, are added to the number of securities available
for future issuance.
(2) Represents shares underlying deferred stock units credited under the Company's Nonqualified Retirement Plan ("NQ Plan"), payable on a one-for-one
basis in shares of Common Stock.
The NQ Plan is a defined contribution deferred compensation plan under which participants are credited with deferred compensation
equal to contributions and benefits that would have accrued to the participant under the Company's tax-qualified retirement plans,
but for limitations under the Internal Revenue Code, and to amounts of salary and annual bonus that the participant elected to
defer. Participant accounts are deemed to be invested in separate investment accounts under the NQ Plan with similar investment
alternatives as those available under the Company's tax-qualified savings and profit sharing plan, including an investment account
deemed invested in shares of Common Stock. The accounts are adjusted to reflect the investment return related to such deemed
investments. Except for the 5,642 shares set forth in the table above, all amounts credited under the NQ Plan are paid in cash.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to its
2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required in response to this item will be contained in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to its
2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.
142
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are filed as a part of this document
under Item 8, "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA."
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
The schedules for the Registrant and its subsidiaries are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they
are required, or because the information is set forth in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index beginning on the following page.
143
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
10.1
10.2
10.3
Description of Documents (1)
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27,
2009.
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 4, 2014.
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 23, 2017.
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2016.
Form of Common Stock Certificate is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (file no 333-213587) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 12, 2016.
Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B, of the Company, dated
as of December 5, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2008.
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of November 22, 2011, between the Company and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 22, 2011.
Satisfaction and Discharge of Indenture, dated as of September 9, 2016, between the Company and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2016.
Subordinated Notes Indenture, dated as of September 29, 2016, between the Company and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2016.
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 29, 2016, to the Subordinated Notes Indenture, dated as of
September 29, 2016, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, is incorporated
herein, by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 29, 2016.
Form of 5.875% Subordinated Notes due 2026 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2016.
Indenture, dated as of November 18, 2003, between the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee is
incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 9, 2004.
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 21, 2009, to Indenture, dated as of November 18, 2003, between the
Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2009.
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of First Midwest Capital Trust I, dated as of August 21, 2009, among
the Company, Wilmington Trust Company, as property trustee and Delaware trustee, and certain named
administrative trustees, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2009.
Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2009, between the Company and Wilmington
Trust Company, as trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2009.
Agreement of Sale and Purchase, dated as of September 12, 2016, between First Midwest Bank and Oak Street
Real Estate Capital, LLC, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2016.
Form of Absolute Lease Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2016.
Loan Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2016, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association,
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2016.
144
Exhibit
Number
10.4 (2)
10.5 (2)
10.6 (2)
10.7 (2)
10.8 (2)
10.9 (2)
10.10 (2)
10.11 (2)
10.12 (2)
10.13 (2)
10.14 (2)
10.15 (2)
10.16 (2)
10.17 (2)
10.18 (2)
10.19 (2)
Description of Documents (1)
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Short Term Incentive Compensation Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 28, 2012.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Annex A
to the Company's Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2013.
Amendment to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 12, 2014.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 27, 2009.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Gain Deferral Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 28, 2008.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 28, 2008.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Nonqualified Retirement Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 28, 2008.
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Savings and Profit Sharing Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33
to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
12, 2014.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company
pursuant to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 12, 2008.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between the Company and certain directors of the Company
pursuant to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on May 12, 2008.
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company pursuant
to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 3, 2014.
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company
pursuant to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 3, 2014.
Form of Performance Shares Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company
pursuant to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 3, 2014.
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company pursuant
to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on May 4, 2016.
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company
pursuant to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 4, 2016.
Form of Performance Shares Award Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the Company
pursuant to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 4, 2016.
145
Exhibit
Number
10.20 (2)
10.21 (2)
10.22 (2)
10.23 (2)
10.24 (2)
10.25 (2)
10.26 (2)
10.27 (2)
10.28
10.29
10.30
11
12
21
23
31.1
31.2
32.1 (3)
32.2 (3)
101
Description of Documents (1)
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2007, between the Company and its Chief Executive Officer is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Form of Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2007, between the Company and its
Chief Executive Officer and to the Class II Employment Agreements between the Company and certain of its
officers is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Employment Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2011, between the Company and its Chief Operating Officer is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2011.
Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2011, between the Company and its Chief
Operating Officer is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between the Company and its Chief Operating Officer pursuant
to the First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 9, 2011.
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2016, between the Company and its Chief Financial Officer
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2017.
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2012, between the Company and its Director of Strategic Planning
and Consumer Banking is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2012.
Form of Class II Employment Agreement between the Company and certain of its executive officers is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain directors, officers and employees of the
Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2012.
Form of Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Agreement between the Company and its Chief Executive
Officer and its Chief Operating Officer is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Form of Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Agreement between the Company and certain officers of the
Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings – The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common
share is included in Note 14 of the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part
II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2017.
Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
Subsidiaries of the Company.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Interactive Data File.
(1)
Except as otherwise indicated, the Securities and Exchange Commission file number for all documents incorporated by reference is 0-10967.
(2) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(3)
Furnished, not filed.
146
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
Registrant
By:
/s/ MICHAEL L. SCUDDER
Michael L. Scudder
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2018
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in their capacities indicated on February 28, 2018.
Signatures
/s/ MICHAEL L. SCUDDER
Michael L. Scudder
/s/ PATRICK S. BARRETT
Patrick S. Barrett
/s/ BARBARA A. BOIGEGRAIN
Barbara A. Boigegrain
/s/ THOMAS L. BROWN
Thomas L. Brown
/s/ BR. JAMES GAFFNEY, FSC
Br. James Gaffney, FSC
/s/ PHUPINDER S. GILL
Phupinder S. Gill
/s/ KATHRYN J. HAYLEY
Kathryn J. Hayley
/s/ PETER J. HENSELER
Peter J. Henseler
/s/ PATRICK J. MCDONNELL
Patrick J. McDonnell
/s/ FRANK B. MODRUSON
Frank B. Modruson
/s/ ROBERT P. O'MEARA
Robert P. O'Meara
/s/ ELLEN A. RUDNICK
Ellen A. Rudnick
/s/ MARK G. SANDER
Mark G. Sander
/s/ MICHAEL J. SMALL
Michael J. Small
/s/ STEPHEN C. VAN ARSDELL
Stephen C. Van Arsdell
/s/ J. STEPHEN VANDERWOUDE
J. Stephen Vanderwoude
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive
Officer
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
147
Exhibit 31.1
I, Michael L. Scudder, certify that:
CERTIFICATION
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Midwest Bancorp Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2018
/s/ MICHAEL L. SCUDDER
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 31.2
I, Patrick S. Barrett, certify that:
CERTIFICATION
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Midwest Bancorp Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2018
/s/ PATRICK S. BARRETT
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 32.1
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of First Midwest
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:
1. The Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
/s/ MICHAEL L. SCUDDER
Name: Michael L. Scudder
Title:
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive
Officer
February 28, 2018
Dated:
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 32.2
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of First Midwest
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:
1. The Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
/s/ PATRICK S. BARRETT
Name:
Title:
Dated:
Patrick S. Barrett
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 28, 2018
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.1STOCKHOLDER INFORMATIONFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc. common stock is traded in the Global Select Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol FMBI. Anticipated dividend payable dates are in January, April, July, and October, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.Stockholders may have their dividends deposited directly to their savings, checking, or money market account at any financial institution. Information concerning Dividend Direct Deposit may be obtained from the Company or our transfer agent.Stockholders may fully or partially reinvest dividends and invest up to $5,000 quarterly in First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. common stock without incurring any brokerage fees. Information concerning dividend reinvestment and stock purchase may be obtained from the Company or our transfer agent.Stockholders with inquiries regarding stock accounts, dividends, change of ownership or address, lost certificates, consolidation of accounts, or registering shares electronically through the Direct Registration System should contact our transfer agent via the following:Phone: (888) 581-9376Correspondence:Mail:ComputershareP.O. Box 505005Louisville, KY 40233-5005Web:www.computershare.com/investorInvestor RelationsFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc.One Pierce Place, Suite 1500Itasca, Illinois 60143(630) 875-7533investor.relations@firstmidwest.comFirst Midwest Bancorp, Inc. files an annual report on Form 10-K and three quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Requests for these reports and other Company filings and general inquiries regarding stock and dividend information, quarterly earnings, and news releases may be directed to Investor Relations at the above address or can be obtained through the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website, www.FirstMidwest.com/InvestorRelations.This report, including the letter to stockholders contained in this report, may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “probable,” “potential,” “possible,” “target,” “continue,” “look forward,” or “assume” and words of similar import. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead express only management’s beliefs regarding future results or events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of management’s control. It is possible that actual results and events may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results or events indicated in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution you not to place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements contained in the letter to stockholders are made only as of the date of the letter, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in the letter to reflect new information or events or conditions. These statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. For a discussion of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should refer to the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as well as our subsequent filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, these risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. Other sections of such reports describe additional factors that could impact our business and financial performance.COMMON STOCKDIVIDEND PAYMENTSDIRECT DEPOSITDIVIDEND REINVESTMENT/STOCK PURCHASETRANSFER AGENT/STOCKHOLDER SERVICESINVESTOR ANDSTOCKHOLDER CONTACTSEC REPORTS ANDGENERAL INFORMATIONFORWARD-LOOKINGSTATEMENTSOvernight:Computershare462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600Louisville, KY 40202Online Inquiries:https://www-us.computershare.com/investor/contactAs of May 2018:8750 W. Bryn Mawr AvenueSuite 1300Chicago, Illinois 606319680_Cover.indd 23/29/18 9:05 PM 2
0
1
7
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
I
F
I
R
S
T
M
D
W
E
S
T
B
A
N
C
O
R
P,
I
N
C
.
FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
2017 ANNUAL REPORT FIRST MIDWEST BANCORP, INC.
One Pierce Place, Suite 1500, Itasca, IL 60143 | 630.875.7450 | FirstMidwest.com
2320-8-305 4/18
9680_Cover.indd 1
3/29/18 9:05 PM