UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ց
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2024
OR
տ
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-14204
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
06-0853042
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
3 Great Pasture Road
Danbury, Connecticut
06810
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 825-6000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol (s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share
FCEL
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq Global Market)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
No ց
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes
No ց
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ց No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ց No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer ց
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company տ
Emerging growth company տ
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting
under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ց
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction
of an error to previously issued financial statements. տ
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s
executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). տ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes տ No ց
As of April 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $424,996,599 based on the closing sale price of
$27.84 as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market, which was retroactively adjusted for the 1-for-30 reverse stock split effective as of 5:00 p.m. ET on November 8, 2024.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Outstanding at December 23, 2024
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share
20,449,715
,
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
Parts Into Which Incorporated
Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Part III
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
INDEX
Page
Description
Number
Part I
Item 1 Business
3
Item 1A Risk Factors
27
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments
44
Item 1C Cybersecurity
44
Item 2 Properties
46
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
46
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures
46
Part II
Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
47
Item 6 Reserved
49
Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
50
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
76
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
78
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
130
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
130
Item 9B Other Information
131
Item 9C Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
131
Part III
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
132
Item 11 Executive Compensation
132
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
132
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
133
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services
133
Part IV
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
134
Item 16 Form 10-K Summary
143
Signatures
144
3
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Index to Item 1. BUSINESS
Page
Forward-Looking Statement Disclaimer
4
Risk Factor Summary
6
General Information
8
Business Overview
9
Our Market Opportunity
9
Our Business Strategy
10
Our Business Model and Competitive Advantages
11
Product Platforms and Applications
12
Our Product Platform Applications – Current and Future
13
Our Markets
14
Levelized Cost of Energy
15
Competition
15
Our Commitment to Sustainability
16
Advanced Technologies Programs
17
License and Joint Development Agreements with EMTEC
17
Company Funded Research and Development
19
Proprietary Rights and Licensed Technology
19
Manufacturing and Service Facilities
20
Raw Material Sourcing and Supplier Relationships
21
Engineering, Procurement and Construction
22
Services and Warranty Agreements
22
Significant Developments in Government Activity
22
Government Regulation
23
Significant Customers
23
People and Organizational Development
23
Available Information
24
4
Forward-Looking Statement Disclaimer
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). All statements other than
statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-K, including statements regarding the Company’s future financial
condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, expectations, future performance, business operations and business
prospects, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “goals,” “projects,”
“intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “predicts,” “should,” “seeks,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “may,” “forecast,” and similar
expressions and variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements and are included, along with
this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA. Forward-looking statements are
neither historical facts, nor assurances of future performance. Instead, such statements are based only on our beliefs,
expectations, and assumptions regarding the future. As such, the realization of matters expressed in forward-looking
statements involves inherent risks and uncertainties. Such statements relate to, among other things, the following:
x
the development and commercialization by FuelCell Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“FuelCell Energy,”
“Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) of fuel cell technology and products and the market for such products,
x
the expected timing of completion of our ongoing projects,
x
our business plans and strategies,
x
the markets in which we expect to operate,
x
expected operating results such as revenue growth and earnings,
x
our belief that we have sufficient liquidity to fund our business operations for the next 12 months,
x
future funding under Advanced Technologies contracts,
x
future financing for projects, including equity and debt investments by investors and commercial bank
financing, as well as overall financial market conditions,
x
the expected cost competitiveness of our technology,
x
our ability to successfully implement our restructuring plan during the expected timeframe and the expected
effects and impacts of the Company’s restructuring plan, and
x
our ability to achieve our sales plans, manufacturing capacity expansion plans, market access and market
expansion goals, and cost reduction targets.
The forward-looking statements contained in this report are subject to risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, that
could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth in or contemplated by the forward-
looking statements, including, without limitation, the risks described under Item 1A - Risk Factors of this report and the
following factors:
x
general risks associated with product development and manufacturing,
x
general economic conditions,
x
changes in interest rates, which may impact project financing,
x
supply chain disruptions,
x
changes in the utility regulatory environment,
x
changes in the utility industry and the markets for distributed generation, distributed hydrogen, and fuel cell
power plants configured for carbon capture or carbon separation,
x
potential volatility of commodity prices that may adversely affect our projects,
x
availability of government subsidies and economic incentives for alternative energy technologies,
x
risks that our restructuring plan will not result in the intended benefits or savings or will result in unanticipated
costs, including but not limited to additional charges and/or higher than expected costs,
x
our ability to remain in compliance with U.S. federal and state and foreign government laws and regulations,
5
x
our ability to maintain compliance with the listing rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”),
x
rapid technological change,
x
competition,
x
the risk that our bid awards will not convert to contracts or that our contracts will not convert to revenue,
x
market acceptance of our products,
x
changes in accounting policies or practices adopted voluntarily or as required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”),
x
factors affecting our liquidity position and financial condition,
x
government appropriations,
x
the ability of the government and third parties to terminate their development contracts at any time,
x
the ability of the government to exercise “march-in” rights with respect to certain of our patents,
x
our ability to successfully market and sell our products internationally,
x
our ability to develop additional commercially viable products,
x
our ability to implement our strategy,
x
our ability to reduce our levelized cost of energy and deliver on our cost reduction strategy generally,
x
our ability to protect our intellectual property,
x
litigation and other proceedings,
x
the risk that commercialization of our new products will not occur when anticipated or, if it does, that we will
not have adequate capacity to satisfy demand,
x
our need for and the availability of additional financing,
x
our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations,
x
our ability to service our long-term debt,
x
our ability to increase the output and longevity of our platforms and to meet the performance requirements of
our contracts, and
x
our ability to expand our customer base and maintain relationships with our largest customers and strategic
business allies.
We cannot assure you that:
x
we will be able to meet any of our development or commercialization schedules,
x
any of our new products or technologies, once developed, will be commercially successful,
x
our power plants will be commercially successful,
x
we will be able to obtain financing or raise capital to achieve our business plans,
x
the government will appropriate the funds anticipated by us under our government contracts,
x
the government will not exercise its right to terminate any or all of our government contracts, or
x
we will be able to achieve any other result anticipated in any other forward-looking statement contained herein.
The forward-looking statements contained herein speak only as of the date of this report and readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except for ongoing obligations to disclose material information
under the federal securities laws, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or
revisions to any such statement to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based.
6
Risk Factor Summary
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Item 1A “Risk Factors”. These
risks include, but are not limited to the following:
x
We have incurred losses and anticipate continued losses and negative cash flows.
x
Our cost reduction strategy for manufacturing may not succeed or may be significantly delayed, which may
result in our inability to deliver improved margins.
x
We have debt and finance obligations outstanding and may incur additional debt in the future, which may
adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results.
x
We rely on project financing for our generation operating portfolio, which includes debt and tax equity
financing arrangements, to realize the benefits provided by investment tax credits and accelerated tax
depreciation. In the event that interest rates continue to rise or there are changes in tax policy, our financial
results could be harmed.
x
Unanticipated increases or decreases in business growth have resulted and may continue to result in adverse
consequences to our financial condition and business strategy.
x
If our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets (including project assets)
become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to operations.
x
Our Advanced Technologies contracts are subject to the risk of termination by the contracting party and we
may not realize the full amounts allocated under some contracts due to the lack of Congressional
appropriations or early termination.
x
Utility companies may resist the adoption of distributed generation and could impose customer fees or
interconnection requirements on our customers that could make our products less desirable.
x
We depend on third party suppliers for the development and timely supply of key raw materials and
components for our products.
x
An increase in energy costs may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
x
Failure to meet Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) expectations or standards or to achieve our
ESG goals could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and stock price.
x
We derive significant revenue from contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes involving
substantial costs and risks. Our contracted projects may not convert to revenue, and our project awards and
sales pipeline may not convert to contracts, which may have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash
flows.
x
We have signed product sales contracts, engineering, procurement and construction contracts (“EPCs”), power
purchase agreements (“PPAs”) and long-term service agreements with customers subject to contractual,
technology, operating, commodity (i.e., natural gas) and fuel pricing risks, as well as market conditions that
may affect our operating results.
x
We extend product warranties for our products, which products are complex and could contain defects and
may not operate at expected performance levels, which could impact sales and market adoption of our
products, affect our operating results or result in claims against us.
x
We currently face and will continue to face significant competition, including from products using other
energy sources that may be lower priced or have preferred environmental characteristics. Our plans are
dependent on market acceptance of our products, and we must develop additional commercially viable
products in order to achieve profitability.
x
Our products use inherently dangerous, flammable fuels, operate at high temperatures and use corrosive
carbonate material, each of which could subject our business to product liability claims.
x
We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and disruptions, failures or security breaches of
our information technology infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on our operations and the
7
operations of our power plant platforms. In addition, increased information technology security threats and
more sophisticated computer crime pose a risk to our systems, networks, products and services.
x
We are required to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. In a prior fiscal year, our
management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If other control
deficiencies are identified in the future, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately, prevent
fraud or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our
Company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.
x
Our results of operations could vary as a result of changes to our accounting policies or the methods, estimates
and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies.
x
We may be affected by environmental and other governmental regulation.
x
A negative government audit could result in an adverse adjustment of our revenue and costs and could result
in civil and criminal penalties.
x
Exports of certain of our products are subject to various export control regulations and may require a license
or permission from the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Energy or other agencies.
x
We will need to raise additional capital, and such capital may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If
we do raise additional capital utilizing equity, existing stockholders will suffer dilution. If we do not raise
additional capital, our business could fail or be materially and adversely affected.
x
We depend on our intellectual property, and our failure to protect that intellectual property could adversely
affect our future growth and success. Additionally, the U.S. government has certain rights relating to our
intellectual property, including the right to restrict or take title to certain patents.
x
Our stock price has been and could remain volatile. Financial markets worldwide have experienced heightened
volatility and instability which may have a material adverse impact on our Company, our customers and our
suppliers.
x
Our failure to meet the continued listing standards of The Nasdaq Global Market could result in a delisting of
our common stock, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our common stock and subject
us to additional trading restrictions.
x
Provisions of Delaware and Connecticut law and of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may make a
takeover more difficult. Our by-laws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the
exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our
stockholders’ ability to obtain a judicial forum deemed favorable by the stockholder for disputes with us or
our directors, officers or employees.
x
The rights of our 5% Series B Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”)
could negatively impact our cash flows and dilute the ownership interest of our common stockholders. The
Series B Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to payments upon liquidation,
dividends, and distributions.
x
Litigation could expose us to significant costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
x
Weakness in the economy and other conditions affecting the financial stability of our customers could
negatively impact future sales of our products and our results of operations.
x
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by economic and political conditions globally and the
effects of these conditions on our customers’ businesses and levels of business activity.
x
Our future success will depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified management, technical and other
personnel.
x
We are subject to risks inherent in international operations.
8
General Information
Information contained in this report concerning the electric power supply industry and the distributed generation market,
the distributed hydrogen market, the energy storage market and the carbon capture market, our general expectations
concerning these industries and markets, and our position within these industries and markets are based on market research,
industry publications, other publicly available information and assumptions made by us based on this information and our
knowledge of these industries and markets, which we believe to be reasonable. Although we believe that the market
research, industry publications and other publicly available information, including the sources that we utilized in preparing
certain portions of this report, are reliable, they have not been independently verified by us and, accordingly, we cannot
assure you that such information is accurate in all material respects. Our estimates, particularly as they relate to our general
expectations concerning the electric power supply industry and the distributed generation market, the distributed hydrogen
market, the energy storage market and the carbon capture market, involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change
based on various factors, including those discussed under the section of this report entitled “Item 1A - Risk Factors.”
Unless otherwise specifically noted herein, all degrees refer to Fahrenheit (“F”); kilowatt (“kW”) and megawatt (“MW”)
numbers used in this report designate nominal or rated capacity of the referenced power plant which is the design rated
output of the referenced power plant as of the date of initiation of commercial operations; “efficiency” or “electrical
efficiency” means the ratio of the electrical energy generated in the conversion of a fuel to the total energy contained in
the fuel (lower heating value, the standard for power plant generation, assumes the water in the product is in vapor form;
as opposed to higher heating value, which assumes the water in the product is in liquid form, net of parasitic load); kW
means 1,000 watts; MW means 1,000,000 watts; “kilowatt hour” (“kWh”) is equal to 1kW of power supplied to or taken
from an electric circuit steadily for one hour; and one British Thermal Unit (“Btu”) is equal to the amount of heat necessary
to raise one pound of pure water from 59oF to 60oF at a specified constant pressure.
All dollar amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.
9
Business Overview
At FuelCell Energy, our purpose is to enable a world powered by clean energy. Founded in 1969 and headquartered in
Danbury, Connecticut, we are a global leader in delivering a variety of clean energy solutions to address some of the
world’s most critical challenges around energy access, resilience, reliability, affordability, safety and security. Since our
inception, FuelCell Energy has been innovating and developing commercial technologies that produce clean electricity,
heat, clean hydrogen, and water. We are also proud to be at the forefront of what we believe to be one of the most critical
technologies required to achieve the world’s overall emissions objectives: carbon capture.
Our business model focuses on generating recurring revenue through power purchase agreements and long-term service
agreements, in addition to non-recurring revenue generated through power platform and component sales and research
contracts related to the development of our Advanced Technologies.
Our commercial product portfolio is based on our carbonate electrochemical platform. We offer our products in several
different configurations for a wide range of power and chemical applications, including electricity, hydrogen, high grade
heat (including steam), water and CO2 upgradable to food and beverage grade and/or usable in cement or other industrial
products, and to concentrate and separate CO2 from fossil-fueled industrial applications allowing the sequestration and/or
utilization of the CO2. We also continue to invest in the development and commercialization of our solid oxide fuel cell
platform. Our efforts include actively seeking strategic partnerships and opportunities that would enable us to deploy this
technology as part of larger-scale energy, emissions reduction and hydrogen generation projects.
We target a range of markets and applications with our products, including utilities and independent power producers, data
centers, wastewater treatment, commercial and hospitality, food and beverage, and microgrids, among others. We market
our products primarily in the United States, Europe and Korea, and we are also pursuing opportunities in other countries
around the world. We target for expansion and development markets and geographic regions that benefit from and value
clean distributed generation; are located where there are high energy costs, poor grid reliability, and/or challenged
transmission and distribution lines; can leverage the multiple value streams delivered by our platforms (electricity,
hydrogen, thermal, water, and carbon recovery); are aligned with regulatory frameworks that harmonize energy, economic
and environmental policies; and are committed to reducing their Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.
As a company, we are committed to helping our customers reduce their environmental impact. We are equally committed
to reducing our environmental impact and have developed and begun implementing a plan to reduce our carbon emissions
to net zero by 2050. Our platforms have a direct impact on reducing our customers’ Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, thus
lowering the global environmental footprint of baseload, or primary, power generation.
In addition to our core commercial products, we engage strategically in research and development, both company-funded
and carried out under grants from and commercial agreements with private companies and various government agencies
through our Advanced Technologies programs. We focus on generating revenue from our core recurring and non-recurring
revenue sources, while working to identify the next trends in clean energy we believe we can commercialize, take to
market, and grow into future revenue streams.
Our Market Opportunity
While there have been many challenges for the clean energy sector during the past 18-24 months, we continue to believe
a large and growing addressable market opportunity exists for our commercially available solutions and those solutions
which we are actively developing for commercialization. Through the capabilities of our platforms, we provide clean,
reliable baseload, or primary power generation (baseload, or primary, power generation is power generated over a period
of time at a steady rate), hydrogen production, high grade heat, carbon recovery from the fuels utilized by our platforms,
isolation and removal of CO2 from exhaust streams, and the ability to use biofuels, renewable natural gas (“RNG”), and
a hydrogen-hydrocarbon fuel blend for power generation feedstock. In addition, we are focused on advancing the
commercialization of our platform technologies to enable the use of pure hydrogen for baseload power generation, to
perform electrolysis to convert water and electricity into hydrogen, and to isolate and remove CO2 from external exhaust
streams.
Additionally, through the deployment of our power generation platform solutions, we can deliver the benefits of clean,
distributed power generation, including the desirable value stream of thermal energy, and avoid the need for massive,
10
expensive, difficult to permit, long distance transmission infrastructure and the above ground risks that the traditional
transmission grid creates.
CO2 is also a valuable input ingredient in many products and processes. We believe that, by using more CO2 (carbon
capture utilization) and emitting less CO2 through the efficiencies of our platforms and by capturing CO2 at the source
point, the use of our platforms can positively impact climate change while improving air quality compared to traditional
combustion power generation. Our platforms are capable of delivering CO2 for food and beverage use, pH balancing of
water supply, extending the shelf life of food vital to global food supply and food security, as a binder in a number of
materials from concrete to sustainable building materials and the production of synthetic fuels, polymers and other
minerals.
See the section below entitled “Our Markets” for information regarding our existing and target markets.
Our Business Strategy
In 2019, we launched our “Powerhouse” strategy to strengthen our business, maximize operational efficiencies and
position us for future growth. Having made progress in achieving key initiatives under the original three pillars of our
strategy, in fiscal year 2022, we updated the three key pillars of our strategy to “Grow, Scale and Innovate.” In conjunction
with the restructuring and revised strategic plan that our Board of Directors approved, and we announced, in November
2024, we have refined and updated certain aspects of this strategy and have further updated the three key pillars of our
strategy to “Focus, Scale and Innovate.”
Focus — Penetrate Significant Market Opportunities
x
Streamline business operations: Advancing our commercial and technical capabilities, but with focus on and
discipline regarding cost structure, capital deployment and cash management.
x
Optimize the core business: Capitalizing on our core technological strengths across targeted customer segments
and delivering applications, including, but not limited to, microgrids, carbon capture, carbon recovery, and
distributed hydrogen.
x
Drive commercial excellence: Strengthening customer relationships and building a customer-centric reputation;
building our sales pipeline by increasing focus on targeted differentiated applications, product sales, energy-
as-a-service financing options, and geographic market and customer segment expansion; and building a broader
network of channel and go-to-market relationships.
Scale — Scale Our Existing Platform to Support Growth
x
Invest: Investing in our current manufacturing capabilities and building new capacity as we advance
commercialization of our carbon capture and solid oxide technologies, enhancing our commercial organization,
creating distribution partnerships, and investing in marketing to ensure the various audiences of our message
have a clear understanding of the potential value propositions and benefits of our platforms and solutions,
including customers, regulatory and legislative bodies in each of our target markets, and investors.
x
Extend process leadership: Building on our legacy and over twenty years of commercial platform process
experience, so that we can scale our new platforms and solution capabilities with the same degree of quality as
our current footprint.
x
Strengthen our team: Continuing development of our team to support our growth and enable our future,
including building an even more diverse, inclusive, intellectually curious, engaged, and purpose-driven
workforce that embodies the culture of the Company and its core values.
x
Expand geographically: Targeting growth opportunities in our traditional markets of North America, Korea,
and Europe, while also positioning the Company to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the Middle East,
Africa, the Asia Pacific region, and South America. We will continue to monitor other global markets for
expansion as those opportunities develop.
11
Innovate — Innovate for the Future
x
Continue product innovations: Investing in continuous customer-driven product improvements, including the
core solid oxide scalable module design, and continuing development of carbon capture and carbon recovery
technologies extending our platform applications.
x
Deepen participation in the developing hydrogen economy: Deepening our hydrogen market participation
beyond our deployed distributed hydrogen Tri-gen platform, primarily by advancing our solid oxide technology
to support growing applications for distributed hydrogen electrolysis and energy storage applications.
x
Diversify our revenue streams by delivering products and services that support the global energy transition:
Through the innovations described above, focusing on developing a suite of platforms and superior
performance attributes, which we believe will be in demand throughout the energy transition allowing us to
increase and broaden our customer penetration, add to the value we deliver to our customers, and diversify our
revenue streams.
Our Business Model and Competitive Advantages
Our business model is based on multiple revenue streams, targeting both recurring revenue and non-recurring revenue.
Recurring revenue is delivered through recurring electricity, capacity, and renewable energy credit sales under power
purchase agreements (“PPAs”) and tariffs for projects we retain in our generation operating portfolio, as well as service
revenue, mainly through long-term service agreements. Non-recurring revenue is generated through power platform and
component sales, as well as from public and private industry research contracts related to the development of our
Advanced Technologies (which are discussed in more detail below).
We are a complete solutions provider for our platform solutions, controlling the design, sales, manufacturing,
installation, operations, and maintenance of our patented fuel cell technology under long-term power purchase
and service agreements. When utilizing long-term PPAs, the end-user of the power or utility hosts the installation and only
pays for power as it is delivered, avoiding up-front capital investment. We also develop projects and sell equipment directly
to customers, providing a complete solution of engineering, installing, and servicing the fuel cell power plant under an
engineering, procurement, and construction agreement (“EPC”) and a long-term maintenance and service agreement. (See
the sections below entitled “Engineering, Procurement and Construction” and “Service and Warranty Agreements” for
more information.) We maintain the long-term recurring service obligation and associated revenues running conterminous
with the life of such projects.
Customers and developers generally have the option to either purchase our fuel cell platforms outright or to enter into a
PPA under which the customer or developer (i.e. the end-user of the power) commits to purchase power as it is produced
for an extended period of time, typically 10 to 20 years. We may elect to retain ownership of a project, or we may elect to
sell all or some of the project to a third party. If a project or project asset is sold, revenue from the sale is recognized and
reflected in the Product revenues line item of our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, and
we recognize revenue separately for the long-term maintenance and service agreement with respect to the project over the
term of that agreement. If a project is retained, we recognize electricity, capacity and/or renewable energy credits monthly
over the term of the PPA. We report the financial performance of retained projects as Generation revenues and Cost of
generation revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Our decision to retain ownership of certain projects is based in part on the recurring, predictable cash flows these projects
can offer us, the proliferation of PPAs in the industry and the potential access to capital. Retaining ownership of PPAs
affords us the full benefit of future cash flows under the PPAs, which are expected to be higher than if we sell the projects,
although retaining ownership requires more upfront capital investment and financing. We plan to continue to grow our
operating portfolio of retained projects prudently and in a balanced manner, while also selling projects to customers or
project investors when selling presents the best value and opportunity for our capital needs or meets the customer’s desired
ownership structure. Additionally, we may monetize certain environmental and incentive tax credits through lending
institutions and tax investors, including through entering into sale-leaseback and partnership-flip structures that reduce our
required net capital investment in a project while still allowing us to retain ownership of the project.
12
We operate and maintain our project platforms for the life of the project regardless of the ownership structure. For all
operating fuel cell platforms not operating under a PPA, customers enter into long-term service agreements with us, some
of which have terms of up to 20 years. We report the revenue earned under long-term maintenance and service agreements
as Service agreements revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Given the long history of investment in and deployment of our solutions, we believe we have distinct competitive
advantages that underpin and enable our strategy, including a strong portfolio of products, intellectual property, deep
technical expertise, strategic innovation and development relationships, and a track record of operational excellence.
Product Platforms and Applications
Our product portfolio is based on our carbonate electrochemical platform. Depending on its configuration, this platform
supports power generation and combined heat and power applications using a variety of fuels, including a 50/50 blend of
hydrogen and natural gas or biogas blends, biogas, renewable natural gas, and natural gas. The fuel cells utilized in these
platforms react fuel electrochemically, without combusting the fuel, which avoids emissions produced by combustion such
as nitrogen oxides (“NOx”), sulfur oxides (“SOx”) and particulates. In the electrochemical process, fuel and air are reacted
in separate chambers in the fuel cell stack. The reactions producing CO2 happen before the fuel is mixed with air, and the
CO2 is concentrated and therefore easy to recover and capture. Our carbonate platforms are enabled to recover and capture
their own CO2 for use or sequestration before it is emitted into the air. These platforms are unique in their ability to also
capture CO2 from an external source, utilizing the flue stream of a power plant or an industrial boiler as a replacement for
ambient air intake.
We are also continuing to strategically invest in the development and commercialization of our solid oxide fuel cell
platform, including actively seeking strategic partnerships that will enable us to deploy this technology as part of larger-
scale energy, emissions reduction and hydrogen generation projects. Our solid oxide platform can operate on pure
hydrogen fuel. We believe this feature will gain importance in the future as hydrogen becomes more widespread as a fuel.
Our solid oxide platform can be used in electrolysis, which is the reverse of fuel cell operation – producing hydrogen from
power and water.
Our multi-featured platforms can be configured to provide a number of value streams, including electricity, hydrogen, high
grade heat (including steam), water and CO2 upgradable to food and beverage grade and/or usable in cement or other
industrial products, and to concentrate and separate CO2 from fossil-fueled industrial applications allowing the
sequestration and/or utilization of the CO2.
We are focused on using our proprietary technology to pursue the following four significant applications, each of which
we believe is important to the global energy transition and to limiting climate change, reducing NOx, SOx, and particulate
pollution, limiting noise pollution associated with traditional power generation and fostering more efficient utilization of
land compared to traditional power generation and intermittent renewable energy platforms:
x
Distributed generation from carbonate platforms (commercially available) and solid oxide modules (under
development);
x
Distributed and large-scale hydrogen production using high efficiency solid oxide electrolysis cell (“SOEC”)
systems (under development) or our Tri-gen carbonate-based platform (commercially available);
x
Carbon capture from external sources (under development) and carbon recovery and utilization enabling carbon
capture utilization and sequestration (commercially available); and
x
Long duration energy storage utilizing reversible solid oxide fuel cells, which alternate between electrolysis
mode (to produce and store hydrogen using input power) and fuel cell mode, regenerating power from the
stored hydrogen (under development).
13
Product Efficiency and Effectiveness
The electrical efficiency of our carbonate fuel cell solutions ranges from approximately 47% to 60% upon initial operations
of our platforms depending on the configuration. When configured for combined heat and power (“CHP”), our system
efficiencies can potentially reach up to 90%, depending on the application. Our solutions are designed to deliver high
electrical efficiency where the power is used, avoiding transmission line losses, which average about 5% for the U.S. grid.
With respect to carbon capture capability, we have demonstrated up to 95% carbon capture from simulated coal power
plant sources while simultaneously producing baseload power. For harder to capture streams, such as natural gas power
generation or industrial boiler capture, we can achieve similarly high capture levels but with reduced power output.
Our Product Platform Applications – Current and Future
Carbonate-Based Distributed Generation
Our proprietary, patented platforms generate electricity directly from fuel, such as hydrogen, hydrogen and natural gas
blends, biogas, renewable natural gas, and natural gas.
We market different configurations and applications of our platform to meet specific market needs, including:
x
On-Site Power (also known as “Behind the Meter”): Customers benefit from improved power resilience,
energy security from on-site power that reduces reliance on the electric grid in an environmentally responsible
manner, and long-term electric and other value stream price certainty. Our fuel cells can be used to produce hot
water or steam, as well as hydrogen and carbon dioxide for beverage and food production in addition to other
industrial uses.
x
Utility Grid Support: Our energy platforms are scalable, enabling multiple fuel cell platforms to be located
together on a very small footprint per MW generated. This capability enables utilities to add multi-megawatt
power generation to enhance electric grid resiliency where needed.
x
Microgrid / Time-to-Power Applications: Our platforms can also be configured as a microgrid, either
independently or with other forms of power generation, with the goal of providing continuous power and a
seamless transition during times of grid outages or when the grid is not an energy option.
Carbonate-Based Distributed Hydrogen
Tri-gen platforms are configurable to deliver on-site hydrogen for transportation, industrial applications, natural gas
blending, repowering combustion-based equipment with zero carbon hydrogen, and other uses. Our Tri-gen hydrogen
platform utilizes proprietary fuel cells configured to simultaneously generate three value streams — power generation,
hydrogen, and water.
Solid Oxide-Based Electrolysis
We have developed a proprietary solid oxide electrolysis technology which is expected to enable production of hydrogen
with high electrical efficiency. We believe that our platform will deliver higher efficiency than our competitors and
competing technologies with or without the addition of waste heat. Our solid oxide stacks in electrolysis mode split water
into hydrogen and oxygen using supplied carbon-free electricity. The hydrogen can be stored as compressed gas, creating
the ability to produce a virtually limitless supply.
The largest factor in the cost of electrolysis-produced hydrogen is the cost of electricity. Consequently, efficiency is one
of the most effective ways to lower cost. We believe our solid oxide platform is among the most efficient available
electrolysis technologies. We believe this translates to 20% to 35% less electrical energy needed per kg of hydrogen
production compared to lower efficiency and low-temperature electrolysis. For example, at an energy cost of $0.10/kWh,
that difference results in $1 to $1.50 lower hydrogen cost with our SOEC platform. We believe our solid oxide platform
offers one of the best chances of achieving the $1 per kg levelized cost of hydrogen targeted by the U.S. Department of
Energy by 2050. Applications for this technology include centralized large scale hydrogen production from grid-scale
14
renewables or nuclear power, and decentralized hydrogen production for industrial, transportation, repowered combustion
generation assets, and synthetic or sustainable fuels for use in aviation and other applications.
We have operated a sub scale demonstration project of our solid oxide electrolysis technology in our Danbury test facility,
which demonstrated the high electrical efficiency discussed above. We have also been awarded a pilot program to provide
a packaged 150 kg/day system for demonstration at Idaho National Laboratory, which has passed Idaho National
Laboratory’s acceptance testing in November 2024 and will be delivered and installed in 2025.
We are focused on the development and commercialization of a new module design that is expected to enhance our ability
to compete for large scale infrastructure projects. Learning from our work on carbon capture, we are developing a module
that incorporates all hot gas piping inside the module. Additionally, the module is being designed to enable a vertical array
plant, improve the serviceability of the platform, enable module “hot swap” to maintain overall plant operations at all
times, and streamline our go-to-market strategy.
We have also adopted this module-centric strategy to allow us to concentrate our resources on developing the high-
efficiency stacks, allowing the complexities and expenses of platform customization, site design, balance of plant
procurement and EPC work to be managed by the large-scale project developers. This strategy has the added benefit of
streamlining our manufacturing processes, simplifying our supply chain, and lowering our working capital intensity.
Lastly, focusing on the core module technology and design allows us to dedicate our engineering resources to the
advancement of the stack and module technology, including both performance and cost, and maintaining a competitive
edge versus the competition.
Solid Oxide-Based Long Duration Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage
We are in the process of developing a solution for long duration energy storage using our proprietary solid oxide
electrolysis technology. Our solid oxide stacks are designed to alternate between electrolysis and power generation mode,
with one of our design goals being improved integration of intermittent wind and solar power generation sources into the
modern electrical grid via long duration storage of energy. Hydrogen-based long duration energy storage has the ability to
transform the way intermittent resources are supported today as an alternative to combustion energy sources for continuous
or peaking power to fill in when intermittent resources are not online. Instead of producing power from fuel and air, a solid
oxide fuel cell stack in electrolysis mode splits water into hydrogen and oxygen using supplied carbon-free electricity.
During high demand periods or periods when intermittent resources are offline, the stored hydrogen can be sent back to
the same solid oxide stacks, which react it with air to produce power and to regenerate the water, which will be stored for
the next cycle.
Carbon Capture, Recovery and Utilization
x
Carbon Capture – Power generation and industrial applications are the source of two-thirds of the world’s carbon
emissions. Cost effective and efficient carbon capture from these two applications globally represents a large
market because it could enable clean use of all available fuels. The carbon capture system is being designed to
separate and concentrate CO2 from the flue gases of natural gas, biomass or coal-fired power plants or other
industrial facilities as a side reaction that extracts and purifies the CO2 in the flue gas during the power generation
process and destroys approximately 70% of NOx emissions during the power generation process.
x
Carbon Recovery and Utilization – In addition to the ability to capture carbon dioxide from an external source,
we are adding the capability to our platforms to extract and purify carbon dioxide produced by the fuel cell power
generation process. Our carbon separation technology allows carbon dioxide to be easily extracted and purified
to the appropriate level for utilization or sequestration, significantly reducing the carbon footprint of the generated
power from our fuel cell platforms. This requires a simple modification to the fuel cell module that can be
incorporated into new platforms as well as retrofitted for existing systems during stack replacements. Over time,
as we replace fuel cell stacks in our deployed modules, we intend to integrate our carbon separation technology,
making every platform receiving a module upgrade carbon separation ready.
Our Markets
We target four distinct market opportunities:
15
x
Distributed Generation: This includes utilities and independent power producers, data centers, wastewater
treatment, and other behind the meter and microgrid applications;
x
Carbon Recovery and Utilization: This includes food and beverage and various industrial applications;
x
Carbon Capture: This includes high CO2 emitters such as the oil and gas sector; and
x
Distributed Hydrogen: This includes industrial hydrogen applications like fertilizer, mobility and material
handling, port applications, and large-scale wind and solar projects for their ability to produce green hydrogen
via electrolysis.
We market our clean energy solutions worldwide, with a longstanding presence in the United States, Europe and Korea,
the largest developed fuel cell market. The utilities and independent power producer market has historically been our
largest market with customers that include utilities on the East and West coasts of the United States, such as UIL Holdings
Corporation, Inc. (owned by Avangrid, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Iberdrola), the Long Island Power Authority
(“LIPA”) and Southern California Edison. In Europe, utility customers include E.ON Connecting Energies, one of the
largest utilities in the world. In Korea, we are contracted to operate and maintain a number of large-scale utility platform
deployments, including a 20 MW power plant project for Korea Southern Power Company (“KOSPO”), a 20 MW power
plant project for Noeul Green Energy Co., Ltd., and a 59 MW power plant project for Gyeonggi Green Energy Co., Ltd.
Our power platforms are producing power for a variety of industrial, commercial, municipal and government customers,
including manufacturing facilities, pharmaceutical processing facilities, universities, healthcare facilities and wastewater
treatment facilities. These institutions expect efficient, clean, and continuous power to reduce operating expenses, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and avoid pollutant emissions to meet their sustainability goals, while boosting resiliency and
limiting dependence on the distribution grid. CHP applications further support economic and sustainability initiatives by
minimizing or avoiding the use of combustion-based boilers for heat. Our patented power platforms are unique in their
ability to run on biogas.
Levelized Cost of Energy
Our fuel cell projects deliver power at a rate comparable to pricing from the grid in our targeted markets. Policy programs
that help to support adoption of clean distributed power generation often lead to below-grid pricing. We measure power
costs by calculating the Levelized Cost of Energy (“LCOE”) over the life of the project.
There are several primary elements to LCOE for our fuel cell projects, including:
x
Capital cost;
x
Operations and maintenance cost; and
x
Fuel expense.
Given the level of integration in our business model of manufacturing, installing and operating fuel cell power platforms,
there are multiple areas and opportunities for cost reductions. We are actively managing and reducing costs in all three
LCOE areas, including cost reduction initiatives with respect to system components and raw materials, advanced lean
manufacturing principles, improvements in lifetime product costs through continued system and platform engineering, and
improvements in output and efficiency. We are also investing in platform design to reduce overall EPC cost associated
with the installation of our platforms.
Competition
The market for clean energy is highly competitive. Many factors, including government incentives and specific market
dynamics, affect how clean energy can deliver outcomes for customers in a given region. While clean energy often
competes against the electric grid, which is readily available to prospective customers and supplied by traditional
centralized power plants, including coal, gas, hydro, and nuclear plants, clean energy is increasingly able to compete with
the grid and long-distance transmission of electricity in terms of levelized cost of electricity. Clean energy sources that
customers may consider beyond our solutions include products such as wind turbines, solar arrays, linear generators and
hydro facilities, as well as a range of hydrogen and fuel cell solutions from both incumbent and developing competitors.
16
Our platforms are based on a range of technologies and target a variety of applications, each of which have incumbent and
developing competitors. Several companies in the U.S. are engaged in fuel cell development, although, to our knowledge,
we are the only domestic company engaged in manufacturing and deployment of stationary natural gas or biogas fueled
carbonate fuel cells. In addition to different types of stationary fuel cells, some other technologies that compete in the
distributed generation marketplace include micro-turbines, turbines, and reciprocating gas engines.
Our stationary fuel cell platforms also compete against large scale solar and wind technologies, although we complement
the unreliable intermittent nature of solar and wind power with the continuous, reliable power output of our fuel cells.
Utility scale solar and wind power require specific geographies and weather profiles, transmission for utility-scale
applications, and a source of back up capacity for when the sun or wind is not available. They also require a significant
amount of land compared to our fuel cell power plants, making it difficult to site megawatt-class solar and wind projects
in urban areas. While fuel cells emit negligible amounts of NOx, SOx and particulate matter, fuel cells do emit some
carbon dioxide when fueled with natural gas or carbon-neutral biogas (although, while operating on biogas, the platform’s
emissions would be considered carbon neutral), but in both cases less per kWh than other less-efficient systems. In many
markets, baseload fuel cells avoid more emissions than wind or solar systems of similar capacity because they operate for
many more hours of the day compared to these intermittent resources.
Product development cycles are long and product quality and efficiency are critical to success. Research and development
investments are crucial in this business, as are focused intellectual property strategies and protection of such, as new
technologies and solutions could make our solutions less competitive.
We continue to invest in exploring new ways of further improving the efficiency and effectiveness of our platforms. Our
objective is to continue to improve our competitive position, including innovating in areas such as offering multiple
platform solutions, and methods for producing clean hydrogen, solid oxide, and carbon separation and carbon capture in
order to add value for customers looking for clean and renewable energy and to aid in their decarbonization goals.
Our Commitment to Sustainability
As a company, we are committed to helping our customers reduce their environmental impact. We are equally committed
to reducing our environmental impact and have therefore developed and begun implementing a plan to reduce our carbon
emissions to net zero by 2050. As part of this commitment, during fiscal year 2024, we:
x
Performed a corporate-level greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions inventory for 2024;
x
Published the 2023 Sustainability Report aligned with international Environmental, Social and Governance
(“ESG”) standards to provide transparency on our sustainability commitments and progress to all of our
stakeholders;
x
Completed a product-level life cycle assessment to understand and potentially reduce GHG emissions throughout
the value chain, from production through decommissioning;
x
Conducted Climate Risk Assessment aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures to
analyze the physical and transition risk across our manufacturing facilities, inform our business strategy and take
appropriate mitigation measures;
x
Continued developing an ESG strategy to prioritize and holistically address our key ESG responsibilities and
stakeholders’ needs; and
x
Successfully integrated an ESG governance model into our business processes.
Our platforms have a direct impact on reducing our customers’ Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, thus lowering the global
environmental footprint of baseload, or primary, power generation. However, our platforms are designed to go beyond
power generation, delivering hydrogen, carbon recovery, carbon capture, water, and thermal energy in various
applications. As a result of our platforms’ ability to deliver multiple value streams, we help our customers reduce their
Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions on-site without buying off-site carbon/environmental offsets, which do not positively
impact the local communities’ air quality or emissions. As a company, we are focused on addressing immediate
environmental impacts such as NOx, SOx, and particulate emissions and the multi-decade impacts on climate change. In
the future, we plan to commercialize our hydrogen, long-duration energy storage, and carbon capture technologies intended
to drive next generation solutions to help customers attain their decarbonization goals and continue to advance core
industries, such as steel manufacturing, cement production, and glass making.
17
Our commitment to sustainability is also evident in the design, manufacturing, installation, and on-going servicing of our
fuel cell energy platforms, which are engineered for the circular economy. For example, when our platforms reach the end
of their useful lives, we have the capability to refurbish and re-use certain parts and also recycle more than 90% by weight
of what we cannot re-use. This is a departure from combustion-based, wind, and solar power generation methods that
typically produce a significant amount of unrecyclable waste, which increases landfill use, and in the case of solar, creates
the possibility of toxic material contamination. Our balance of plant (“BOP”), i.e., the mechanical and electrical
components surrounding the fuel cell, is designed to have an operating life of 25-to-30 years, at which time metals such
as steel and copper are reclaimed for scrap value. For context, by weight, approximately 93% of our entire energy platform
can be re-used or recycled at the end of its useful life.
Advanced Technologies Programs
Our Advanced Technologies programs include research and development and demonstration programs funded by third
parties. We undertake both privately funded and publicly funded research and development to develop and grow these
opportunities, reduce product and output costs, and expand our technology portfolio. Our Advanced Technologies
programs are currently focused on continued development and commercialization of our solutions that advance solid oxide
fuel cells, distributed hydrogen, and carbon capture. We report the revenue earned under these programs as Advanced
Technologies contract revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
We have historically worked on technology development with various U.S. government departments and agencies,
including the U.S. Department of Energy (the “DOE”), the Department of Defense (the “DOD”), the Environmental
Protection Agency (the “EPA”), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”), the Office of Naval
Research (the “ONR”), the Department of State (the “DOS”) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(“NASA”). Government funding, principally from the DOE and DOS, provided 4%, 3% and 6% of our revenue for the
fiscal years ended October 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. In addition to these U.S. government departments and
agencies, we also work to develop technologies through privately funded programs with companies like Canadian Natural
Resources, Drax Group and ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company (formerly known as ExxonMobil
Research and Engineering Company) (“EMTEC”).
Beyond the external funding sources described above, we intend to prudently invest capital to accelerate commercialization
of solid oxide fuel cells, carbon capture and separation, and long-duration energy storage solutions, as discussed below in
more detail in the section entitled “Company Funded Research and Development.”
License and Joint Development Agreements with EMTEC
EMTEC and FuelCell Energy began working together in 2016 under an initial joint development agreement with a focus
on better understanding the fundamental science behind carbonate fuel cells for use in advanced applications and
specifically how to increase efficiency in separating and concentrating carbon dioxide from the exhaust of natural gas-
fueled power generation.
In June 2019, we entered into a license agreement with EMTEC to facilitate the further development of our carbon capture
platform (the “EMTEC License Agreement”). Pursuant to the EMTEC License Agreement, we granted EMTEC and its
affiliates a non-exclusive, worldwide, fully-paid, perpetual, irrevocable, non-transferable license and right to use our
patents filed on or before April 30, 2021, and any data, know-how, improvements, equipment designs, methods, processes
and the like provided directly by the Company or its affiliates to EMTEC or its affiliates under any agreement or otherwise,
on or before April 30, 2021, to the extent it is useful to research, develop and commercially exploit carbonate fuel cells in
applications in which the fuel cells concentrate carbon dioxide from external industrial and power sources and for any
other purpose attendant thereto or associated therewith, in exchange for a $10 million payment. Such right and license is
sublicensable to third parties performing work for or with EMTEC or its affiliates but is not otherwise sublicensable.
18
The EMTEC License Agreement facilitated the execution of the Joint Development Agreement between the Company and
EMTEC (which was originally effective as of October 31, 2019) (as amended, the “Joint Development Agreement”). The
initial focus of the Joint Development Agreement was to further enhance carbonate fuel cell technology for the purpose of
capturing carbon dioxide from industrial facilities. The Joint Development Agreement, which initially had a two-year term,
commenced effective as of October 31, 2019. In a series of amendments to the Joint Development Agreement, which were
effective as of October 31, 2021, April 30, 2022, December 1, 2022, and August 31, 2023, the Company and EMTEC
extended the term of the Joint Development Agreement such that it was to expire by its terms on March 31, 2024 and
increased the maximum amount of research costs to be reimbursed by EMTEC from $45.0 million to $67.0 million. The
original terms of the Joint Development Agreement and the terms of the amendments thereto are described more fully in
the Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company on November 6, 2019, November 2, 2021, May 5, 2022, December
19, 2022, and August 28, 2023.
Effective as of March 31, 2024, we and EMTEC entered into Amendment No. 5 (“Amendment No. 5”) to the Joint
Development Agreement. In Amendment No. 5, the Company and EMTEC further extended the term of the Joint
Development Agreement such that it will end on December 31, 2026 (unless terminated earlier), so that we and EMTEC
may pursue continued work to allow for technical readiness of the Generation 2 Technology fuel cell module as well as
additional continuous technology development.
In parallel with the Joint Development Agreement, we and EMTEC will pursue pioneer commercial deployments of the
Generation 2 Technology with third parties, with us as the fuel cell module manufacturer for such deployments.
In furtherance of the ultimate goal of commercializing the Generation 2 Technology, Amendment No. 5 provides us,
among other rights and benefits, with the ability to pursue new carbon capture projects with third parties for the remaining
duration of the term of the Joint Development Agreement using Generation 1 Technology or Generation 2 Technology
(provided that the use of Generation 2 Technology must be limited to the use of Generation 2 physical fuel cell properties
and design elements in Generation 1 Technology modules), with any new sales of such activities, authorized work, and
carbon capture projects, when summed together, having the capability of capturing no more than 250,000 tons of CO2 on
a cumulative annual basis.
Under Amendment No. 5, following expiration of the term of the Joint Development Agreement, the Company will also
have the opportunity to continue to service continuing obligations for such projects entered into during the term of the
Joint Development Agreement (e.g., completion of contracted builds, service and repair/replacement of components, etc.).
To allow the Company to pursue such projects, in Amendment No. 5, EMTEC also granted to the Company a worldwide,
non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable (during the term of the Joint Development Agreement), non-sub-licensable license
to EMTEC’s Generation 1 Technology as well as to EMTEC’s Generation 2 Technology physical fuel cell properties and
design elements (including EMTEC’s background information and background patents relating to Generation 2
Technology physical fuel cell properties and design elements).
Amendment No. 5 also removed the cap on the maximum amount of research costs to be reimbursed by EMTEC, and
instead includes an expected annual budget for the anticipated work through the remaining term of the Joint Development
Agreement of at least $10.0 million per year, subject to approval by EMTEC. Research costs will be set forth in project
descriptions that are subject to mutual agreement and pre-approval by us and EMTEC in writing. As has been the case for
the entire term of the Joint Development Agreement, project descriptions will continue to be described in written, mutually
agreed upon documents. In addition, in Amendment No. 5, the hourly rates for the Company’s engineers, scientists, and
all other full-time employees were increased by 15% over the rates established in the original Joint Development
Agreement, and such rates will increase by 3% annually beginning on March 31, 2025.
For our use in power applications and hydrogen applications, the Joint Development Agreement includes certain
worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable licenses to practice the Program Results (as defined in the Joint
Development Agreement), EMTEC’s background information and background patents for Generation 1 Technology,
and EMTEC’s background information and background patents for Generation 2 Technology. Amendment No. 5 makes
clear that such licenses will continue on a royalty-free basis going forward.
19
Company Funded Research and Development
In addition to research and development performed under research contracts, including as described under the heading
“Advanced Technologies Programs” above, we also fund our own research and development activities to (i) advance our
core carbonate and solid oxide cell module capabilities and (ii) support the commercial fleet with product enhancements
and improvements.
We work to continuously improve and mature our products and implement lessons learned into our product designs and
manufacturing process subsequent to introduction. We also continue to invest in improvement initiatives with respect to
our core molten carbonate technology. For example, we have identified improvement opportunities ranging from improved
thermal management by reducing internal temperature to improving the performance of our electrical balance of plant and
implemented design changes to our commercial platforms which are expected to improve overall product performance.
As it relates to our fuel cell modules, these improvements center around delivering more uniform temperature distribution
within the stack modules with the intent of improving output over the life of the modules to achieve the product’s expected
design life. Continued extension of design life and output of our modules over time is a core research and development
focus. In addition, we are also investing in our commercialization of our patented technologies, such as carbon capture
and separation, solid oxide fuel cells, and solid oxide electrolysis cells for hydrogen production and energy storage as we
believe these technologies represent significant future market opportunities.
We are also focused on the development and commercialization of a module design that enhances our ability to compete
for large scale infrastructure projects. This work focused on developing a module that incorporates all hot gas piping inside
the module. This design is expected to greatly improve serviceability and operational availability. This module-centric
strategy allows us to concentrate our resources on developing the high-efficiency stacks and allowing the engineering work
surrounding the balance of plant design, site design, and EPC work to be managed by the large-scale project developers.
We believe that focusing on the core module technology and design allows us to dedicate our engineering resources to the
advancement of the stack and module technology, including both performance and cost, and maintaining a competitive
edge versus the competition.
Company funded research and development is included in Research and development expenses (operating expenses) in
our consolidated financial statements. The total research and development expenditures in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Loss, including third party and Company-funded expenditures, are as follows:
Years Ended October 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Cost of Advanced Technologies contract revenues
$
17,509
$
13,185
$
15,184
Research and development expenses
55,404
61,021
34,529
Total research and development
$
72,913
$
74,206
$
49,713
Proprietary Rights and Licensed Technology
Our intellectual property consists of patents, trade secrets, institutional knowledge and know-how that we believe is a
competitive advantage and represents a barrier to entry for potential competitors. We have extensive experience in
designing, manufacturing, operating and maintaining fuel cell power plants. This experience cannot be easily or quickly
replicated and, combined with our trade secrets, proprietary processes and patents, safeguards our intellectual property
rights.
As of October 31, 2024, we (excluding our subsidiaries) had 148 U.S. patents and 307 patents in other jurisdictions
covering our fuel cell technology (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple jurisdictions), with patents
directed to various aspects of our carbonate technology, solid oxide fuel cell (“SOFC”) technology, proton exchange
membrane (“PEM”) fuel cell technology and applications thereof. As of October 31, 2024, we also had 28 patent
applications pending in the U.S. and 86 patent applications pending in other jurisdictions.
As of October 31, 2024, our subsidiary, Versa Power Systems, Ltd. (“Versa”), had 19 U.S. patents and 68 international
patents covering SOFC technology (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple jurisdictions). As of October
31, 2024, Versa also had 13 pending U.S. patent applications and 30 patent applications pending in other jurisdictions. In
addition, as of October 31, 2024, our subsidiary, FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH, had license rights to 2 U.S. patents
and 7 patents outside the U.S. (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple jurisdictions) for carbonate fuel
cell technology licensed from Fraunhofer IKTS.
20
We continue to innovate, and no patent expiration, either individually or in the aggregate, is expected to have any material
impact on our current or anticipated operations.
Certain of our U.S. patents are the result of government-funded research and development programs, including our DOE
programs. U.S. patents we own that resulted from government-funded research are subject to the government potentially
exercising “march-in” rights. We believe that the likelihood of the U.S. government exercising these rights is remote and
would only occur if we ceased our commercialization efforts and there was a compelling national need to use the patents.
Manufacturing and Service Facilities
We operate a 167,000 square-foot manufacturing facility in Torrington, Connecticut where we produce the individual cell
packages and assemble fuel cell modules for our carbonate fuel cell products. This facility also houses our global service
center. Our completed modules are conditioned in Torrington and shipped directly to customer sites. We continue to invest
in manufacturing capability with the goal of reducing production bottlenecks and driving productivity, including
investments in automation, laser welding, and the construction of additional integrated conditioning capacity. We also
constructed a SureSource 1500 in Torrington during fiscal year 2022, which operates as a testing facility for qualifying
new supplier components and performance testing and validation of continued platform innovations. Additionally, we
completed the construction of an on-site fuel cell demonstration and test unit in fiscal year 2024. This platform allows for
component testing, with the goal of accelerating the integration of alternate suppliers and allows prospective customers to
observe demonstrated capabilities of the fuel cell platform, such as carbon separation, including for the sampling and
testing of separated CO2 to verify quantity, quality or purity requirements for food and beverage companies. As of October
31, 2024, the Torrington facility was operating at a 27.7 MW per year annualized production rate on a single production
shift. Maximum annualized capacity (module manufacturing, final assembly, testing and conditioning) is 100 MW per
year under the Torrington facility’s current configuration when being fully utilized. The Torrington facility is sized to
accommodate the eventual annualized production capacity of up to 200 MW per year with additional capital investment
in machinery, equipment, tooling and inventory.
We design and manufacture the core fuel cell components that are stacked on top of each other to build a fuel cell stack.
For megawatt-scale power plants, four fuel cell stacks are combined to build a 1.4 MW fuel cell module. To complete the
power platform, the fuel cell module or modules are combined with the BOP. The mechanical BOP processes the incoming
fuel such as natural gas or biogas and includes various fuel handling and processing equipment such as pipes and blowers.
The electrical BOP processes the power generated for use by the customer and includes electrical interface equipment such
as an inverter. The BOP components are either purchased directly from suppliers or the manufacturing is outsourced based
on our designs and specifications. This strategy allows us to leverage our manufacturing capacity, focusing on the critical
aspects of the power plant where we have specialized knowledge and expertise and possess extensive intellectual property.
BOP components are shipped directly to a project site and are then assembled with the fuel cell module into a complete
power plant.
The Torrington production and service facility and the Danbury corporate headquarters and research and development
facility are ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 certified and our Field Service operation (which maintains the installed
fleet of our platforms) is ISO 9001:2015 certified, reinforcing the tenets of our quality management system and a focus on
safety, continuous improvement, and commitment to quality, environmental stewardship, and customer satisfaction.
Sustainability is promoted throughout our organization. We manufacture our products and manage them through end-of-
life using environmentally friendly business processes and practices, certified to ISO 14001:2015. We continually strive
to improve how we plan and execute across the entire product life cycle. We maintain a chain of custody and responsibility
of our products throughout the product life cycle and strive for “cradle-to-cradle” sustainable business practices,
incorporating sustainability in our corporate culture. When our platforms reach the end of their useful lives, we can
refurbish and re-use certain parts and then recycle most of what we cannot re-use. By weight, approximately 93% of the
entire power plant can be re-used or recycled at the end of its useful life.
Our manufacturing and research and development facility in Calgary, Alberta, Canada is focused on the engineering and
development of our SOFC and SOEC technologies. This facility also houses our SOFC and SOEC stack research and
development effort and includes equipment for the manufacturing of solid oxide cells and stacks, including advanced
manufacturing capabilities. Beginning in fiscal year 2022, we started making additional investments in the Calgary facility
to establish a center of competence and excellence for solid oxide cell and stack research and manufacturing. This facility
includes equipment for the manufacturing of solid oxide cells and stacks, including an advanced automated stack
manufacturing line which has been developed to ensure that the labor and overhead which are required to produce these
21
technologies are optimized for efficiency and complement the low direct material cost of the stack. The current annualized
production capacity of the Calgary facility is 6 MW of SOEC production based on currently installed equipment. During
the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, we entered into lease expansions, extensions and amending agreements
which expanded the space leased in Calgary to include an additional approximately 68,000 square feet, for a total of
approximately 100,000 square feet of space. In addition, long-lead process equipment has been ordered to facilitate the
expansion of manufacturing capacity for the solid oxide platforms in Calgary. Upon the completion of the Calgary capacity
expansion, we believe that the total annualized SOEC manufacturing capacity could potentially be increased to up to 80
MW per year. However, in November 2024, we announced a global restructuring of our operations in the U.S., Canada,
and Germany that aims to reduce operating costs, realign resources toward advancing the Company’s core technologies,
and protect the Company’s competitive position amid slower-than-expected-investments in clean energy. This
restructuring plan also includes the deferment and cancelation of certain previously planned capital and project
expenditures. As a result of this restructuring plan, we have deferred the capital spending required to complete the Calgary
expansion and do not currently have an estimated completion date for this project. For more information about our
restructuring plan, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
We have a manufacturing and service facility in Taufkirchen, Germany that has the capability to perform final module
assembly for up to 20 MW per year of sub-megawatt fuel cell power platforms to service the European market. Our
European service activities are also operated out of this location. Our operations in Europe are certified under both ISO
9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015.
As we continue our focus on business in international markets such as Europe and Asia, we plan to explore manufacturing
and assembly opportunities in those markets to achieve more efficient product manufacturing and supply chain operations,
as well as meet the increasing government requirements for the inclusion of locally sourced content and components in
order to benefit from enhanced clean energy investment incentives.
Raw Material Sourcing and Supplier Relationships
We use various commercially available raw materials and components to construct a fuel cell module, including nickel
and stainless steel, which are key inputs in our manufacturing process. Our fuel cell stack raw materials are sourced from
multiple vendors and are not considered precious metals. We have a global integrated supply chain with qualified sources
of supply, many of which are located locally in the regions in which we have established manufacturing and service
operations including Europe and Asia. We have not sourced or procured, and do not source or procure, directly or
indirectly, any materials from Russia.
From time to time, we may enter into over-the-counter financial hedges to mitigate market price volatility associated with
our underlying physical commodity exposure (and other asset classes) consistent with our Financial Risk Management
Policy. These hedges are non-speculative in nature, are entered into with investment grade-rated multinational financial
institutions and are governed under the terms of the International Swaps and Derivative Association. While we
manufacture the fuel cells in our Torrington facility, the electrical and mechanical BOPs are assembled by and procured
from several suppliers. All of our suppliers must undergo a stringent and rigorous qualification process. We continually
evaluate and qualify new suppliers as we diversify our supplier base in our pursuit of lower costs, security of supply, and
consistent quality. We purchase mechanical and electrical BOP components from third party vendors, based on our own
proprietary designs.
Assuring the absence of conflict minerals in our power platforms is a continuing initiative. Our fuel cells, including the
fuel cell components and completed fuel cell module, do not utilize any 3TG minerals (i.e., tin, tungsten, tantalum and
gold) that are classified as conflict minerals. We utilize componentry in the BOP such as computer circuit boards that
utilize trace amounts of 3TG minerals. For perspective, total shipments in fiscal year 2023 weighed approximately 4.6
million pounds, of which only 14.0 pounds, or 0.000299%, represented 3TG minerals, so the presence of these minerals
is negligible. Our conflict mineral disclosure filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form SD
contains specific information on the actions we are taking to avoid the use of conflict minerals.
As we continue to grow our business, we remain focused on improving quality, increasing the competitive supply
landscape, maintaining existing supplier relationships, as well as building strong new key supplier relationships to expand
our supply chain options.
22
Engineering, Procurement and Construction
We provide customers with complete turn-key solutions, including development, engineering, procurement, construction,
interconnection and operations for our fuel cell projects. We have developed relationships with many design firms and
licensed general contractors and have a repeatable, safe, and efficient execution philosophy that has been successfully
demonstrated in numerous jurisdictions, both domestically and abroad, all with an exemplary safety record. The ability to
rapidly and safely execute installations minimizes high-cost construction period financing and can assist customers in
certain situations when the commercial operations date for a project is time sensitive.
Services and Warranty Agreements
Ou commercial product portfolio is based on our carbonate electrochemical platform. We offer a comprehensive portfolio
of services, including engineering, project management and installation, and long-term operating and maintenance
programs, including trained technicians that remotely monitor and operate our platforms around the world, 24 hours a day
and 365 days a year. We directly employ field technicians to service the power platforms and maintain distribution centers
near our customers to support the high availability of our platforms.
For all operating fuel cell platforms not under a PPA, customers purchase long-term service agreements (“LTSAs”), some
of which have terms of up to 20 years. Pricing for LTSAs is based upon the value of service assurance and the markets in
which we compete and includes all future maintenance and fuel cell module exchanges. Each model of our carbonate
electrochemical platform has a target design life of 25-to-30 years. The fuel cell modules, with legacy modules having a
5-year target cell design life and current production modules having a 7-year target cell design life, go through periodic
replacement, while the BOP systems, which consist of conventional mechanical and electrical equipment, are maintained
over the life of the project.
Under the typical provisions of both our LTSAs and PPAs, we provide services to monitor, operate, service and maintain
power platforms to meet specified performance levels. Operations and maintenance are key drivers for power platforms
to deliver their projected revenue and cash flows. The service aspects of our business model provide a recurring and
predictable revenue stream for the Company. We have committed future production for scheduled fuel cell module
exchanges under LTSAs and PPAs through the respective expiration dates of such LTSAs and PPAs, which range through
2042. The pricing structure of the LTSAs incorporates these scheduled fuel cell module exchanges and the committed
nature of this production facilitates our production planning. Many of our PPAs and LTSAs include guarantees for system
performance, including electrical output and heat rate. Should the power platform not meet the minimum performance
levels, we may be required to replace the fuel cell module with a new or used replacement module and/or pay performance
penalties. Our goal is to optimize the power platforms to meet expected operating parameters throughout their contracted
service terms.
In addition to our service agreements, we provide a warranty for our products against manufacturing or performance
defects for a specific period of time. The warranty term in the U.S. is typically 15 months after shipment or 12 months
after acceptance of our products. We accrue for estimated future warranty costs based on historical experience.
Significant Developments in Government Activity
For many countries around the world, 2024 has proven to be more tumultuous than the prior year. This is the case, at least
in part, due to the national elections which have taken place or will take place in over 70 countries. In the United States,
for example, Congress largely avoided advancing energy legislation, while U.S. regulators, including the U.S. Treasury
and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), DOE, EPA and others worked to implement various parts of the Inflation Reduction
Act (the “IRA”), which was enacted in August of 2022.
Since enactment of the IRA, we have filed multiple comment letters, including formal comments related to the
promulgation of rules to govern Sections 45V, 48E and 45Y of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”). The Company’s
comments are largely aligned with the industry’s views, which have focused on statutory intent, compliance with existing
regulations, achieving technical accuracy and other fine points that are relevant to our sector and our business. It is
important to note that the IRA introduced a series of new tax credits and also reformulated existing tax credits, some of
which have been in place since the 1970s to incentivize development of renewable, clean energy. And while the Treasury
and IRS have not yet issued final rules governing the new hydrogen credit (45V) or the new investment and production
23
credits, 48E and 45Y, respectively, the statute itself stipulates that the tax credits available under Section 48 and 45 of the
IRC will expire for the vast majority of taxpayers on December 31, 2024.
Lastly, the IRA reinforced the concept of transferrable credits, allowing the owner of an eligible clean energy project to
transfer the tax credit to another taxpayer, setting a new standard and creating opportunity for many companies like
FuelCell Energy.
Government Regulation
Our Company and our products are subject to various federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations relating to,
among other things, land use, safe working conditions, handling and disposal of hazardous and potentially hazardous
substances and emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere. Emissions of SOx and NOx from our power plants are
substantially lower than conventional combustion-based generating stations and are far below existing and proposed
regulatory limits. The primary emissions from our power plants, assuming no cogeneration application, are humid flue gas
that is discharged at temperatures of 700-800° F, water that is discharged at temperatures of 10-20° F above ambient air
temperatures, and CO2 in per-kW hour amounts that are, due to the high efficiency of fuel cells, significantly less than
conventional fossil fuel central generation power plants. Depending on the jurisdiction, whether our plants require water
discharge permits is dependent upon whether the discharge is directed to a storm drain or wastewater system.
Significant Customers
Information concerning the Company’s dependence on significant customers is incorporated herein by reference to Note 1.
“Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies–Concentrations” of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
People and Organizational Development
We are committed to our continued efforts to increase diversity and foster an inclusive work environment that supports
the global workforce and the communities we serve. We recruit the best qualified employees regardless of gender, ethnicity
or other protected traits and it is our policy to fully comply with all laws (domestic and foreign) applicable to discrimination
in the workplace. Our diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging principles are also reflected in our employee training and
policies.
As of October 31, 2024, we had 584 full-time employees, of which 465 were located in the United States, 99 were located
in Canada, 11 were located in Germany, 8 were located in Korea and 1 was located in Singapore. There were no part time
employees as of October 31, 2024.
We increased our diverse team member population by 5% in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023.
In November 2024, we announced a global restructuring of our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Germany that aims to
reduce operating costs, realign resources toward advancing the Company’s core technologies, and protect the Company’s
competitive position amid slower-than-expected-investments in clean energy. The restructuring plan included a reduction
in our workforce of approximately 13% or 75 employees in November 2024 and includes reduced spending for product
development, overhead and other costs. This followed a 4% or 17 employee reduction in workforce in September 2024.
For more information about these restructuring actions, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 —
Subsequent Events.
Compensation and Benefits
As part of our compensation philosophy, we believe that we must offer and maintain market competitive compensation
and benefit programs for all of our team members in order to attract and retain superior and diverse talent. In addition to
competitive base wages, additional programs include an annual Management Incentive Plan, Long-Term Equity Incentive
Plans, and a Company matched 401(k) Plan.
Workforce Environmental Health and Safety
We take workplace jobsite safety and environmental compliance very seriously. Under our robust environmental, health
and safety (“EH&S”) program, we strongly encourage the reporting of near misses to identify opportunities for
24
improvement and we are constantly evaluating our EH&S protocols in an effort to keep our facilities and workspaces
environmentally friendly and safe for our team members, stakeholders, customers, and visitors.
We are committed to EH&S excellence. Our Environmental Management System is certified to ISO 14001:2015, and our
Occupational Health & Safety Management System is certified to ISO 45001:2018. Health and safety is both a bottom-up
and top-down priority as the Company’s Board of Directors is actively engaged in ongoing review of our polices, protocols
and performance.
Our EH&S core principles are:
x
Zero injuries / incidents;
x
Compliance with all legal obligations;
x
Pollution prevention;
x
Waste reduction; and
x
Continual improvement.
We are also in the process of performing life cycle analyses on our products, as well as our production and office locations,
and developing a roadmap to net zero carbon emissions.
Our safety performance is excellent and is demonstrated by experience modification rates below the industry average of
1.0 for the last 7 fiscal years: 2018: 0.62, 2019: 0.65, 2020: 0.59, 2021: 0.68, 2022: 0.088, 2023: 0.89 and 2024: 0.83. We
have maintained an “A” rating since 2016 providing “Safety Tier 1” performance with ISNetworld, a database for online
contractor safety management designed to streamline companies' and contractors' compliance pre-qualification processes.
Because EH&S compliance is a priority for us, we also leverage ISNetworld to qualify contractors that work on our
projects.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information electronically with the SEC. Our
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those
reports are made available free of charge through the “Investors” section of the Company’s website
(http://www.fuelcellenergy.com) as soon as practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the
SEC. Material contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this report. Our executive offices are located
at 3 Great Pasture Road, Danbury, CT 06810. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC located at http://www.sec.gov.
25
Information about our Executive Officers
NAME
AGE
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
Jason B. Few
President, Chief Executive Officer
58
Mr. Few was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in
August 2019 and has served as a director since 2018. Mr. Few chairs the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). Mr. Few
previously served as the Company’s Chief Commercial Officer from
September 2019 to March 2022. Prior to joining FuelCell Energy, Mr. Few
served as President of Sustayn Analytics LLC, a cloud-based software
waste and recycling optimization company, since 2018, and as the Founder
and Senior Managing Partner of BJF Partners LLC, a privately held
strategic consulting firm, since 2016. Mr. Few has over 30 years of
experience increasing enterprise value for Global Fortune 500 and
privately-held technology, telecommunications, technology and energy
firms. He has overseen transformational opportunities across the
technology and industrial energy sectors, in roles including Founder and
Senior Managing Partner of BJF Partners, LLC; President and Chief
Executive Officer of Continuum Energy, an energy products and services
company, from 2013-2016; various roles including Executive Vice
President and Chief Customer Officer of NRG Energy, Inc., an integrated
energy company, from 2011 to 2012; President of Reliant Energy, from
2009 to 2012 and Vice President, Smart Energy, a retail electricity
provider, from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Few also previously served as a Senior
Advisor to Verve Industrial Protection, an industrial cybersecurity
software company, since 2016.
Mr. Few was elected to the board of directors of Enbridge Inc. (NYSE:
ENB) effective May 4, 2022, and serves on the Audit, Finance and Risk
and Sustainability Committees. Mr. Few also served on the board of
directors of Marathon Oil (NYSE: MRO) from April 2019 to May 2022.
Mr. Few received his Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Systems in Business
from Ohio University, and a Masters of Business Administration from
Northwestern University’s J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
Michael S. Bishop
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
56
Mr. Bishop was appointed Executive Vice President in June 2019 and has
served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since June 2011.
Mr. Bishop previously served as the Company’s Treasurer from June 2011
to June 2022 and as Senior Vice President of the Company from June 2011
to June 2019. Mr. Bishop was reappointed Treasurer of the Company in
August 2023. He has more than 25 years of experience in financial
operations and management with public high growth technology
companies with a focus on capital raising, project finance, debt/treasury
management, investor relations, strategic planning, internal controls, and
organizational development. Since joining the Company in 2003,
Mr. Bishop has held a succession of financial leadership roles, including
Assistant Controller, Corporate Controller and Vice President and
Controller. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bishop held finance and
accounting positions at TranSwitch Corporation, Cyberian Outpost, Inc.
and United Technologies, Inc. He is a certified public accountant and
began his professional career at McGladrey and Pullen, LLP (now RSM
US LLP). Mr. Bishop also served four years in the United States Marine
Corps.
26
NAME
AGE
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
Mr. Bishop received his Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Boston
University and a Masters of Business Administration from the University
of Connecticut.
Michael Lisowski
Executive Vice President, Strategic
Partnerships
55
Mr. Lisowski was appointed Executive Vice President, Strategic
Partnerships in April 2024. Prior to this, Mr. Lisowski had served as the
Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since
June 2019, and as the Company’s Vice President of Global Operations
from January 2018 to June 2019. From 2001 to 2018, Mr. Lisowski held
various other operations management positions within the Company,
including Vice President of Supply Chain from 2010 to 2018. Mr.
Lisowski is a senior global operations leader with progressive operations
experience in technology-driven businesses having direct responsibility
for supply chain, manufacturing, quality, project management, EH&S and
plant engineering functions. In his position as the Company’s Executive
Vice President, Strategic Partnerships, Mr. Lisowski is responsible for the
development and expansion of strategic partnerships including, but not
limited to, our carbon capture technology.
Mr. Lisowski received his Bachelor’s Degree in Communications and
Business Administration at Western New England University and a
Master’s Degree in Management, Global Supply Chain Integrations from
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Joshua Dolger
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
50
Mr. Dolger was appointed Executive Vice President and General Counsel
on December 10, 2021 and Corporate Secretary on June 25, 2021. Mr.
Dolger previously served as Interim General Counsel from June 25, 2021
to December 10, 2021 and as Senior Counsel from May 17, 2021 to June
25, 2021. In his current positions, Mr. Dolger oversees all the Company’s
legal and governmental affairs, as well as provides leadership in all aspects
of the Company’s business, including commercial matters, compliance,
corporate governance and board activities. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Dolger held a variety of legal positions of increasing responsibility at
the headquarters of Terex Corporation, a public company and a global
manufacturer of aerial work platforms and materials
processing
machinery, most recently as Assistant General Counsel from January 2016
to March 2021. Mr. Dolger’s focus included Securities and Exchange
Commission work, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance,
commercial contract drafting and negotiation, and implementation of the
company’s multi-year strategic supply chain initiative. Prior to joining
Terex Corporation, Mr. Dolger was a senior corporate attorney at Pullman
& Comley, LLC. Mr. Dolger is a licensed attorney in Connecticut and New
York.
Mr. Dolger received a Bachelor of Arts Degree from the State University
of New York at Albany and Juris Doctor from Pace University School of
Law.
Mark Feasel
Executive Vice President, Chief
Commercial Officer
54
Mr. Feasel was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial
Officer in April 2022. Mr. Feasel served as President, Smart Grid – North
America of Schneider Electric USA (“Schneider Electric”), a multinational
energy efficiency and automation provider, from December 2019 to April
2022. Prior to that, he served Schneider Electric as Vice President, Electric
27
Utility Segment & Smart Grid from July 2012 to December 2019, as Vice
President, Sales and Marketing from November 2010 through July 2012,
and as Director, Sales and Marketing from March 2005 to November 2010.
As President, Smart Grid – North America, Mr. Feasel had responsibility
for the Electric Utility segment, Smart Grid, and Microgrid for Schneider
Electric in North America. Throughout his career at Schneider Electric, he
held leadership roles in Energy Management, Power Quality, Utility
Solutions, Oil & Gas Solutions, Electrical Distribution Protection and
Automation, and Microgrids. Mr. Feasel joined Schneider Electric in 2005
through the company’s acquisition of Power Measurement, Inc., and began
his career with the United States Navy serving in the Electrical Division
where he was responsible for the operation and maintenance of the systems
associated with the nuclear reactor plant on a ballistic missile submarine.
Mr. Feasel has also served as an Adjunct Professor at Northwestern
University since June 2020, where he teaches Electric Utility Grid
Planning and Operations for the Master of Science in Energy and
Sustainability Program.
Mr. Feasel is a graduate of the University of Toledo.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Prior to making a decision about investing in our
securities, you should carefully consider the specific risk factors discussed below, together with all of the other information
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks and
uncertainties we have described are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our operations. If any such risks actually occur, our business,
financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such cases, the market price of
our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business, Industry and Supply Chain
We have incurred losses and anticipate continued losses and negative cash flows.
We have transitioned from a research and development company to a commercial products manufacturer, services provider
and developer. We have not been profitable since our year ended October 31, 1997. We expect to continue to incur net
losses and generate negative cash flows until we can produce sufficient revenues and gross profit to cover our costs. We
may never become profitable. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain or increase our profitability
in the future. For the reasons discussed in more detail below, there are uncertainties associated with our achieving and
sustaining profitability. We have, from time to time, sought financing in the public markets in order to fund operations and
will continue to do so. Our future ability to obtain such financing could be impaired by a variety of factors, including, but
not limited to, the price of our common stock and general market conditions.
Our cost reduction strategy for manufacturing may not succeed or may be significantly delayed, which may result in
our inability to deliver improved margins.
Our cost reduction strategy for manufacturing is based on the assumption that increases in production will result in
economies of scale. In addition, our cost reduction strategy relies on advancements in our manufacturing process, global
competitive sourcing, engineering design, reducing the cost of capital and technology improvements (including stack life
and projected power output). Failure to achieve our cost reduction targets could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
28
We have debt and finance obligations outstanding and may incur additional debt in the future, which may adversely
affect our financial condition and future financial results.
As of October 31, 2024, our total consolidated debt and finance obligations outstanding (“indebtedness”) was $135.9
million ($131.7 million, net of deferred finance costs).
Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal and interest and other required repayments depends on our future
performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may
not generate cash flows from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures.
If we are unable to generate such cash flows, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets,
restructuring operations, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or dilutive.
We may incur additional indebtedness in the future in the ordinary course of business, which could include onerous
restrictions on us. If new debt is added to current debt levels, the risks described above could intensify. Our debt agreements
contain representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, and events of default that entitle the lenders to
cause our indebtedness under such debt agreements to become immediately due and payable.
We rely on project financing for our generation operating portfolio, which includes debt and tax equity financing
arrangements, to realize the benefits provided by investment tax credits and accelerated tax depreciation. In the event
that interest rates continue to rise or there are changes in tax policy, our financial results could be harmed.
Rising interest rates may increase our cost of capital. Part of our business strategy is to generate positive cash flows after
debt service from our generation operating portfolio. Rising interest rates may have an adverse impact on the cost of debt
and thus result in lower cash flows after debt service than we realize today. We also expect that projects we retain in our
generation operating portfolio will receive capital from tax equity investors who derive a significant portion of their
economic returns through tax benefits. Tax equity investors are generally entitled to substantially all of the project’s tax
benefits, such as those provided by the U.S. investment tax credit (“ITC”) and Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery
System or bonus depreciation. Our ability to obtain additional financing in the future depends on the continued confidence
of financing sources in our business model and the continued availability of tax benefits applicable to our products. If we
are unable to enter into tax equity financing agreements with attractive pricing terms, or at all, we may not be able to obtain
the capital needed to finance the build out of our generation assets which would impact our overall liquidity and our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unanticipated increases or decreases in business growth have resulted and may continue to result in adverse
consequences to our financial condition and business strategy.
We operate a 167,000 square-foot manufacturing facility in Torrington, Connecticut where we produce the individual cell
packages and assemble the fuel cell modules for our carbonate fuel cell products. The maximum annualized capacity
(module manufacturing, final assembly, testing and conditioning) is 100 MW per year under the Torrington facility’s
current configuration when being fully utilized. The Torrington facility is sized to accommodate the eventual annualized
production capacity of up to 200 MW per year with additional capital investment in machinery, equipment, tooling and
inventory.
We have a manufacturing and service facility in Taufkirchen, Germany that has the capability to perform final module
assembly for up to 20 MW per year of carbonate sub-megawatt fuel cell power platforms to service the European market.
Our European service activities are also operated out of this location.
Our manufacturing and research and development facility in Calgary, Alberta, Canada is focused on the engineering and
development of our SOFC and SOEC technologies. This facility also houses our SOFC and SOEC stack research and
development effort and includes equipment for the manufacturing of solid oxide cells and stacks, including advanced
manufacturing capabilities. Beginning in fiscal year 2022, we started making additional investments in the Calgary facility
to establish a center of competence and excellence for solid oxide cell and stack research and manufacturing. This facility
includes equipment for the manufacturing of solid oxide cells and stacks, including an advanced automated stack
manufacturing line which has been developed to ensure that the labor and overhead which are required to produce these
technologies are optimized for efficiency and complement the low direct material cost of the stack. The current annualized
production capacity of the Calgary facility is 6 MW of SOEC production based on currently installed equipment. During
the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, we entered into lease expansions, extensions and amending agreements
which expanded the space leased in Calgary to include an additional approximately 68,000 square feet, for a total of
29
approximately 100,000 square feet of space. In addition, long-lead process equipment has been ordered to facilitate the
expansion of manufacturing capacity for the solid oxide platforms in Calgary. Upon the completion of the Calgary capacity
expansion, we believe that the total annualized SOEC manufacturing capacity could potentially be increased to up to 80
MW per year. However, in November 2024, we announced a global restructuring of our operations in the U.S., Canada,
and Germany that aims to reduce operating costs, realign resources toward advancing the Company’s core technologies,
and protect the Company’s competitive position amid slower-than-expected-investments in clean energy. This
restructuring plan also includes the deferment and cancelation of certain previously planned capital and project
expenditures. As a result of this restructuring plan, we have deferred the capital spending required to complete the Calgary
expansion and do not currently have an estimated completion date for this project. If our restructuring plan does not result
in the intended benefits or savings or results in unanticipated costs, including but not limited to additional charges and/or
higher than expected costs, or if we are unable to successfully implement our restructuring plan during the expected
timeframe, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. For more information
about our restructuring plan, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
If our business does not grow as quickly as we expect, our existing and planned manufacturing facilities would, in part,
represent excess capacity for which we may not recover the cost. In that circumstance, our revenues may be inadequate to
support our committed costs and our planned growth, and our gross margins and business strategy would be adversely
affected. If our business grows more quickly than we anticipate, our existing and planned manufacturing facilities may
become inadequate and we may need to seek out new or additional space, or retrofit or further equip our existing facilities,
at considerable cost to us.
If our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets (including project assets) become
impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to operations.
We have recorded significant impairment charges, and may in the future be required to record significant impairment
charges, to operations in our financial statements should we determine that our goodwill, other indefinite-lived intangible
assets (i.e., in process research and development (“IPR&D”)) and other long-lived assets (i.e., project assets, property,
plant and equipment and amortizing intangible assets) are impaired. Such charges might have a significant impact on our
reported financial condition and results of operations. Project assets and property, plant and equipment impairment charges
totaled approximately $1.3 million, $2.4 million and $1.8 million for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and
2022, respectively.
As required by accounting rules, we review our goodwill for impairment at least annually as of July 31 or more frequently
if facts and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit that has goodwill is
less than its carrying value. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of
our goodwill might not be recoverable include a significant decline in projections of future cash flows and lower future
growth rates in our industry. We review IPR&D for impairment on an annual basis as of July 31 or more frequently if facts
and circumstances indicate the fair value is less than the carrying value. If the technology has been determined to be
abandoned or not recoverable, we would be required to record a charge reflecting impairment of the asset. We review
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. We consider a project asset commercially viable and recoverable if such project asset is anticipated to be
sellable for a profit, or generates positive cash flows, in excess of the cost of the project asset once it is either fully
developed or fully constructed. If any of our project assets are not considered commercially viable or costs are not deemed
to be recoverable, we would be required to record a charge reflecting the impairment of such project assets.
Our Advanced Technologies contracts are subject to the risk of termination by the contracting party and we may not
realize the full amounts allocated under some contracts due to the lack of Congressional appropriations or early
termination.
A portion of our revenues has been derived from long-term cooperative agreements and other contracts with the DOE and
other U.S. government agencies. These agreements are important to the continued development of our technology and our
products. We also contract with private sector companies under certain Advanced Technologies contracts to develop
strategically important and complementary offerings.
Generally, our privately funded Advanced Technologies contracts, including our EMTEC Joint Development Agreement,
contracted demonstration projects undertaken with EMTEC or other ExxonMobil affiliates, and our government research
and development contracts are subject to the risk of termination at the convenience of the contracting party and may contain
30
certain milestones and deliverables which we may not be able to meet if actual results or the timing of deliverables differ
materially from our original estimates or contractually agreed timelines. Furthermore, with respect to government-funded
contracts, irrespective of the amounts allocated by the contracting agency, such contracts are subject to annual
Congressional appropriations and the results of government or agency sponsored reviews and audits of our cost reduction
projections and efforts. We can only receive funds under government-funded contracts ultimately made available to us
annually by Congress as a result of the appropriations process. Accordingly, we cannot be sure whether we will receive
the full amounts awarded under our privately funded, government research and development or other contracts.
Termination of the contracts or failure to receive the full amounts under any of our Advanced Technologies contracts could
materially and adversely affect our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Utility companies may resist the adoption of distributed generation and could impose customer fees or interconnection
requirements on our customers that could make our products less desirable.
Investor-owned utilities may resist adoption of distributed generation fuel cell plants as such plants are disruptive to the
utility business model that primarily utilizes large central generation power plants and associated transmission and
distribution. On-site distributed generation that is on the customer-side of the electric meter competes with the utility.
Distributed generation on the utility-side of the meter generally has power output that is significantly less than central
generation power plants and may be perceived by the utility as too small to materially impact its business, limiting its
interest. Additionally, perceived technology risk may limit utility interest in stationary fuel cell power plants.
Utility companies commonly charge fees to larger, industrial customers for disconnecting from the electric grid or for
having the capacity to use power from the electric grid for back up purposes. These fees could increase the cost to our
customers of using our SureSource products and could make our products less desirable, thereby harming our business
prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on third party suppliers for the development and timely supply of key raw materials and components for our
products.
We use various raw materials and components to construct a fuel cell module, including nickel and stainless steel that are
critical to our manufacturing process. We also rely on third-party suppliers for the BOP components in our products.
Suppliers must undergo a qualification process, which takes four to twelve months. We continually evaluate new suppliers,
and we are currently qualifying several new suppliers. There are a limited number of suppliers for some of the key
components of our products. In addition, to the extent the processes that our suppliers use to manufacture components are
proprietary, we may be unable to obtain comparable components from alternative suppliers, all of which could harm our
business prospects, results of operations and financial condition. We do not know whether we will be able to maintain
long-term supply relationships with our critical suppliers, or secure new long-term supply relationships on terms that will
allow us to achieve our objectives, if at all. A supplier’s failure to develop and supply components in a timely manner or
to supply components that meet our quality, quantity or cost requirements or our technical specifications, or our inability
to obtain alternative sources of these components on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, could each harm our
ability to manufacture our products. In addition, our supply chain was adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic,
and in the future could be adversely affected by pandemics or other widespread adverse public health events, which may
create global shipping and logistics challenges. These challenges may include extended shipping lead times and pricing
pressures on transportation and logistics that could adversely impact our ability to meet our production schedules and
project deadlines, may result in additional and increased costs, or may otherwise adversely impact our business, results of
operations and financial condition. If such events occur and we are unable to pass these costs on to our customers or timely
complete projects, we may experience reduced revenue and other adverse impacts on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
An increase in energy costs may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our results of operations can be directly affected by volatility in the cost and availability of energy, which is subject to
global supply and demand and other factors beyond our control. Higher energy costs result in increases in operating
expenses at our manufacturing facilities, in the expense of shipping materials to our facilities, and in the expense of
operating our projects for which we procure natural gas, all of which may in turn adversely affect our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
31
Failure to meet Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) expectations or standards or to achieve our ESG
goals could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and stock price.
In recent years, there has been an increased focus from stakeholders on ESG matters, including greenhouse gas emissions
and climate-related risks, renewable energy, water stewardship, waste management, diversity, equality and inclusion,
responsible sourcing and supply chain, human rights, and social responsibility. Given our commitment to ESG matters,
we actively manage these issues and have established and publicly announced certain goals, commitments, and targets
which we may refine or even expand further in the future. These goals, commitments, and targets reflect our current plans
and aspirations and are not guarantees that we will be able to achieve them. Evolving stakeholder expectations and our
efforts to manage these issues, report on them, and accomplish our goals present numerous operational, regulatory,
reputational, financial, legal, and other risks, any of which could have a material adverse impact, including on our
reputation and stock price.
Such risks and uncertainties include:
• reputational harm, including damage to our relationships with customers, suppliers, investors, governments,
or other stakeholders;
•
adverse impacts on our ability to sell and manufacture products;
•
the success of our collaborations with third parties;
•
increased risk of litigation, investigations, or regulatory enforcement action;
•
unfavorable ESG ratings or investor sentiment;
•
diversion of resources and increased costs to control, assess, and report on ESG metrics;
•
our ability to achieve our goals, commitments, and targets within the timeframes announced;
•
access to and increased cost of capital; and
•
adverse impacts on our stock price.
Any failure, or perceived failure, to meet evolving stakeholder expectations and industry standards or achieve our ESG
goals, commitments, and targets could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition,
and stock price.
Risks Related to Sales of our Products
We derive significant revenue from contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes involving substantial
costs and risks. Our contracted projects may not convert to revenue, and our project awards and sales pipeline may not
convert to contracts, which may have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash flows.
We expect a significant portion of the business that we will seek in the foreseeable future will be awarded through
competitive bidding against other fuel cell technologies and other forms of power generation. The competitive bidding
process involves substantial costs and a number of risks, including the significant cost and managerial time to prepare bids
and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us and our failure to accurately estimate the resources and costs
that will be required to fulfill any contract we win. In addition, following a contract award, we may encounter significant
expense, delay or contract modifications or award revocation as a result of our competitors protesting or challenging
contracts awarded to us in competitive bidding. Our failure to compete effectively in this procurement environment could
adversely affect our revenue and/or profitability.
Some of the project awards we receive and orders we accept from customers require certain conditions or contingencies
(such as permitting, interconnection, financing or regulatory approval) to be satisfied, some of which are outside of our
control. Certain awards are cancelable or revocable at any time prior to contract execution. The time periods from receipt
of an award to execution of a contract, or receipt of a contract to installation may vary widely and are determined by a
number of factors, including the terms of the award, governmental policies or regulations that go into effect after the award,
the terms of the customer contract and the customer’s site requirements. These same or similar conditions and
contingencies may be required by financiers in order to draw on financing to complete a project. If these conditions or
contingencies are not satisfied, or changes in laws affecting project awards occur, or awards are revoked or cancelled,
project awards may not convert to contracts, and installations may be delayed or canceled. This could have an adverse
impact on our revenue and cash flow and our ability to complete construction of a project.
32
We have signed product sales contracts, EPCs, PPAs and long-term service agreements with customers subject to
contractual, technology, operating, commodity (i.e. natural gas) and fuel pricing risks as well as market conditions that
may affect our operating results.
We apply the transfer of control over time revenue recognition method under Accounting Standards Codification Topic
606: Revenue from Contracts with Customers to certain service contracts which are subject to estimates. On an annual
basis, we perform a review process to help ensure that total estimated contract costs include estimates of costs to complete
that are based on the most recent available information. The amount of costs incurred on a cumulative to date basis as a
function of estimated costs at completion is applied to contract consideration to determine the cumulative revenue that
should be recognized to date.
We have contracted under long-term service agreements with certain customers to provide service on our products over
terms up to 20 years. Under the provisions of these contracts, we provide services to maintain, monitor, and repair customer
power plants to meet minimum operating levels. Pricing for service contracts is based upon estimates of future costs
including future module exchanges. While we have conducted tests to determine the overall life of our products, we have
not run certain of our products over their projected useful life or in all potential conditions prior to large scale
commercialization. As a result, we cannot be sure that these products will last to their expected useful life or perform as
anticipated in all conditions, which could result in warranty claims, performance penalties, maintenance and module
replacement costs in excess of our estimates, losses on service contracts and/or a negative perception of our products. As
a result of our products’ lack of maturity, we have incurred and may continue to incur charges for warranty claims,
performance penalties, maintenance and module replacement costs in excess of our estimates and losses on service
contracts. Each of these risks could be material under these contracts and, as a result, we may experience diminished
returns or be required to write off all or a portion of our capitalized costs in these project assets.
In certain instances, we have executed PPAs with the utility, end-user of the power or site host of the fuel cell power plant.
We may then sell the PPA and power plant to a project investor or retain the project and collect revenue from the sale of
power over the term of the PPA, recognizing electricity revenue as power is generated and sold. Our growing portfolio of
project assets used to generate and sell power under PPAs and utility tariff programs exposes us to operational risks and
uncertainties, including, among other things, lost revenues due to prolonged outages, replacement equipment costs, risks
associated with facility start-up operations, failures in the availability or acquisition of fuel (including natural gas and
renewable natural gas), the impact of severe adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, cybersecurity
attacks, risks of property damage or injury from energized equipment, availability of adequate water resources and ability
to intake and discharge water, use of new or unproven technology, fuel commodity price risk and fluctuating market prices,
and lack of alternative available fuel sources.
Our ability to proceed with projects under development and complete construction of projects on schedule and within
budget may be adversely affected by escalating costs for materials and fuel (including natural gas and renewable natural
gas), supply chain and logistics challenges, tariffs, labor and regulatory compliance, inability to obtain necessary permits,
interconnections or other approvals on acceptable terms or on schedule and by other factors. If any development project
or construction is not completed, is delayed or is subject to cost overruns, we could become obligated to make delay or
termination payments or become obligated for other damages under contracts, experience diminished returns or be required
to write off all or a portion of our capitalized costs in the project. Each of these events could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We extend product warranties for our products, which products are complex and could contain defects and may not
operate at expected performance levels, which could impact sales and market adoption of our products, affect our
operating results or result in claims against us.
We develop complex and evolving products and we continue to advance the capabilities of our fuel cell stacks. We produce
carbonate fuel stacks with a 7-year cell design life. We are also in the process of manufacturing and selling SOEC and
SOFC products. We provide product warranties for a specific period of time against manufacturing or performance defects.
We accrue for warranty costs based on historical warranty claim experience; however, actual future warranty expenses
may be greater than we have assumed in our estimates. Issues have been and may continue to be found in existing or new
products including, but not limited to, module decay rates which have exceeded and may continue to exceed design
expectations. This has resulted and may continue to result in a delay in recognition or loss of revenues and may result in
loss of market share or failure to achieve broad market acceptance. The occurrence of defects has also caused and may
continue to cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair costs in excess of our estimates, could divert the
33
attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts, and could harm our relationships with our
customers. Although we seek to limit our liability, a product liability claim brought against us, even if unsuccessful, would
likely be time consuming, could be costly to defend, and may hurt our reputation in the marketplace. Our customers could
also seek and obtain damages from us for their losses.
We currently face and will continue to face significant competition, including from products using other energy sources
that may be lower priced or have preferred environmental characteristics.
We compete on the basis of our products’ reliability, efficiency, environmental considerations and cost. Technological
advances in alternative energy products, improvements in the electric grid or other sources of power generation that use
lower priced fuel or no fuel, or other fuel cell technologies may negatively affect the development or sale of some or all
of our products or make our products less economically attractive, non-competitive or obsolete prior to or after
commercialization. Significant decreases in the price of alternative technologies or grid delivered electricity, or significant
increases in the price of our fuels could have a material adverse effect on our business because other generation sources
could be more economically attractive to consumers than our products. Additionally, in certain markets, consumers and
regulators have expressed a preference for zero-carbon generating resources over fueled resources, which could adversely
affect sales of our products in such markets.
Other companies, some of which have substantially greater resources than ours, are currently engaged in the development
of products and technologies that are similar to, or may be competitive with, our products and technologies. Several
companies in the U.S. are engaged in fuel cell development, although we are the only domestic company engaged in
manufacturing and deployment of stationary carbonate fuel cells. Other emerging fuel cell technologies include small or
portable PEM fuel cells, stationary phosphoric acid fuel cells, stationary solid oxide fuel cells, and small residential solid
oxide fuel cells. Any of these technologies and any of our competitors has the potential to capture market share in our
target markets. There are also other potential fuel cell competitors internationally that could capture market share.
Other than fuel cell developers, we must also compete with companies that manufacture combustion-based distributed
power equipment, including various engines and turbines, and have well-established manufacturing, distribution, operating
and cost features. Electrical efficiency of these products can be competitive with our power plants in certain applications.
Significant competition may also come from gas turbine companies and large scale solar and wind technologies.
Our plans are dependent on market acceptance of our products.
Our plans are dependent upon market acceptance of, as well as enhancements to, our products. Fuel cell systems represent
an emerging market, and we cannot be sure that potential customers will accept fuel cells as a replacement for traditional
power sources or non-fuel based power sources, hydrogen generation sources or storage. As is typical in a rapidly evolving
industry, demand and market acceptance for recently introduced products and services are subject to a high level of
uncertainty and risk. Since the distributed generation, hydrogen, carbon capture and storage markets are still evolving, it
is difficult to predict with certainty the size of these markets and their growth rates. The development of a market for our
products may be affected by many factors that are out of our control, including:
x
the cost competitiveness of our fuel cell products including availability and output expectations and total cost
of ownership;
x
the future costs of natural gas, renewable natural gas (biofuels), and other fuels used by our fuel cell products;
x
customer reluctance to try a new product;
x
the market for distributed generation, hydrogen, carbon capture and storage and government policies that affect
those markets;
x
government incentives, mandates or other programs favoring zero carbon energy sources;
x
local permitting and environmental requirements;
x
customer preference for non-fuel based technologies; and
34
x
the emergence of newer, more competitive technologies and products.
If a sufficient market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we anticipate, we may be unable to recover the losses
we will have incurred in the development of our products, and we may never achieve profitability.
We must develop additional commercially viable products in order to achieve profitability. Our development timeline
for bringing new commercially viable products to market has shifted as a result of delays in adoption of clean energy
technologies, timing of product developments and implementation of our recently announced global restructuring
and workforce reduction plan, which may not be successful.
In fiscal year 2022, we provided aspirational long-term revenue targets to be met by the end of fiscal year 2025 and fiscal
year 2030. In developing these revenue targets, we made certain timing assumptions regarding, among other things, the
development, commercialization and market adoption timelines of our SOEC, SOFC and carbon capture products.
However, these long-term revenue targets do not reflect the current market realities regarding the pace of hydrogen
adoption and infrastructure build out as well as continuing uncertainty regarding the IRA and other large scale clean energy
policies globally. In addition, in November 2024, we announced a global restructuring of our operations in the U.S.,
Canada, and Germany that aims to reduce operating costs, reduce headcount, realign resources toward advancing the
Company’s core technologies, and protect the Company’s competitive position amid slower-than-expected-investments in
clean energy. As part of the restructuring plan, we have begun to reduce spending on product development. As a result of
current market realities, and in conjunction with our restructuring plan, the timing of the development and
commercialization of our SOEC, SOFC and carbon capture products has been delayed from our prior estimates and
accordingly, due to these factors, we will not meet the aspirational revenue targets that we provided in fiscal year 2022.
Going forward, the commercialization of these technologies will be paced by market adoption of new clean energy
products and our ability to contract with partners to bring our solutions to market. If we are unable to meet cost or
performance goals with respect to these products once commercialized, including goals for power output, hydrogen
production, rates of carbon capture, useful life and reliability, then our ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability
from sales of these new products will be delayed or may not occur at all. In addition, if we are unable to develop additional
commercially viable products in the future, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to become profitable. The
profitable commercialization of our products depends on our ability to reduce the costs of our products, and there can be
no assurance that we will be able to sufficiently reduce these costs to achieve profitability. Also, if our restructuring plan
and workforce reduction does not result in the intended benefits or savings or results in unanticipated costs, including but
not limited to additional charges and/or higher than expected severance and employee termination benefits costs, or if we
are unable to successfully implement our restructuring plan during the expected timeframe, our results of operations and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected. For more information about our restructuring plan, please see
Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
Our products use inherently dangerous, flammable fuels, operate at high temperatures and use corrosive carbonate
material, each of which could subject our business to product liability claims.
Our business exposes us to potential product liability claims that are inherent in products that use hydrogen. Our products
utilize fuels such as natural gas and convert these fuels internally to hydrogen that is used by our products to generate
electricity. Although our platforms do not combust fuels for the generation of electricity, the fuels we use are combustible
and may be toxic. In addition, our SureSource products operate at high temperatures and use corrosive carbonate material,
which could expose us to potential liability claims. Although we incorporate a robust design and redundant safety features
in our power plants, have established comprehensive safety, maintenance, and training programs, follow third-party
certification protocols, codes and standards, and do not store natural gas or hydrogen at our power plants, we cannot
guarantee that there will not be accidents. Any accidents involving our products or other hydrogen-using products could
materially impede widespread market acceptance and demand for our products. In addition, we might be held responsible
for damages beyond the scope of our insurance coverage. We also cannot predict whether we will be able to maintain
adequate insurance coverage on acceptable terms.
35
Risks Related to Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity
We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and disruptions, failures or security breaches of our
information technology infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on our operations and the operations of our
power plant platforms. In addition, increased information technology security threats and more sophisticated computer
crime pose a risk to our systems, networks, products and services.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic
and financial information and to manage a variety of business processes and activities, including communication with
power plants owned by us or our customers and production, manufacturing, financial, logistics, sales, marketing and
administrative functions. Additionally, we collect and store data that is sensitive to us and to third parties. Operating these
information technology networks and systems and processing and maintaining this data, in a secure manner, are critical to
our business operations and strategy. We depend on our information technology infrastructure to communicate internally
and externally with employees, customers, suppliers and others. We also use information technology networks and systems
to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements and to operate our fuel cell power plants. These information
technology systems, many of which are managed by third parties or used in connection with shared service centers, may
be susceptible to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to failures during the process of upgrading or replacing software,
databases or components thereof, power outages, hardware failures, computer viruses, attacks by computer hackers or
other cybersecurity risks including the impact of emerging technologies, telecommunication failures, user errors, natural
disasters, terrorist attacks or other catastrophic events. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer
severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our disaster recovery and business continuity plans do not effectively resolve
the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and
adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results, or our fuel cell power plant operations
may be disrupted, exposing us to performance penalties under our contracts with customers.
In addition, information technology security threats — from user error to cybersecurity attacks designed to gain
unauthorized access to our systems, networks and data — are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Cybersecurity
attacks may range from random attempts to coordinated and targeted attacks, including sophisticated computer crime and
advanced persistent threats. These threats pose a risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality,
availability and integrity of our data.
Cybersecurity attacks could also include attacks targeting customer data or the security, integrity and/or reliability of the
hardware and software installed in our products. We have experienced, and may continue to experience in the future,
cybersecurity attacks that have resulted in unauthorized parties gaining access to our information technology systems and
networks and, in one instance, gaining control of the information technology system at one of our power plants. However,
to date, no cybersecurity attack has resulted in any material loss of data, interrupted our day-to-day operations or had a
material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. While we actively manage information
technology security risks within our control, there can be no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to mitigate all
potential risks to our systems, networks and data. In addition to the direct potential financial risk as we continue to build,
own and operate generation assets, other potential consequences of a material cybersecurity attack include reputational
damage, litigation with third parties, disruption to systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected
information, corruption of data, diminution in the value of our investment in research, development and engineering, and
increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness, results
of operations and financial condition. The amount of insurance coverage we maintain may be inadequate to cover claims
or liabilities relating to a cybersecurity attack.
Additionally, the legal and regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy in the U.S. and
international jurisdictions is constantly evolving. Violation or non-compliance with any of these laws or regulations,
contractual requirements relating to data security and privacy, or our own privacy and security policies, either intentionally
or unintentionally, or through the acts of intermediaries could have a material adverse effect on our brand, reputation,
business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as subject us to significant fines, litigation losses, third-
party damages and other liabilities.
36
Tax, Accounting, Compliance and Regulatory Risks
We are required to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. In a prior fiscal year, our management
identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If other control deficiencies are
identified in the future, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately, prevent fraud or file our periodic
reports in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our Company and, as a result, the value
of our common stock.
We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”), to furnish a report by management
on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Complying with Section 404
requires a rigorous compliance program as well as adequate time and resources. We may not be able to complete our
internal control evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. Additionally, if we identify one or
more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will not be able to assert that our internal
controls are effective. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In a prior fiscal year, our management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which
has been remediated. We cannot be certain that other material weaknesses and control deficiencies will not occur in the
future. If material weaknesses are identified in the future, or if we are not able to comply with the requirements of
Section 404 in a timely manner, our reported financial results could be materially misstated and we could be subject to
investigations or sanctions by regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources,
and the value of our common stock could decline.
To the extent we identify future weaknesses or deficiencies, there could be material misstatements in our consolidated
financial statements and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations. As a result, our ability to obtain
additional financing on favorable terms or at all could be materially and adversely affected which, in turn, could materially
and adversely affect our business, our financial condition and the value of our common stock. If we are unable to assert
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in the future, investor confidence in the accuracy and
completeness of our financial reports could be further eroded, which would have a material adverse effect on the price of
our common stock.
Our results of operations could vary as a result of changes to our accounting policies or the methods, estimates and
judgments we use in applying our accounting policies.
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on our results
of operations. Such methods, estimates and judgments are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, and factors may arise over time that could lead us to reevaluate our methods, estimates and judgments.
In future periods, management will continue to reevaluate its estimates for contract margins, service agreements, loss
accruals, warranty, performance guarantees, liquidated damages, inventory valuation allowances and allowance for
doubtful accounts. Changes in those estimates and judgments could significantly affect our results of operations and
financial condition. We will also adopt changes required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC.
We may be affected by environmental and other governmental regulation.
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to, among other things, land use, safe
working conditions, handling and disposal of hazardous and potentially hazardous substances and emissions of carbon
dioxide and pollutants into the atmosphere. Our business exposes us to the risk of harmful substances escaping into the
environment, resulting in personal injury or loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, and natural resource damage.
Depending on the nature of the claim, our current insurance policies may not adequately reimburse us for costs incurred
in settling environmental damage claims, and in some instances, we may not be reimbursed at all. In addition, it is possible
that industry-specific laws and regulations will be adopted covering matters such as transmission scheduling, distribution,
emissions, and the characteristics and quality of our products, including installation and servicing. These regulations could
limit the growth in the use of carbonate fuel cell products, decrease the acceptance of fuel cells as a commercial product
and increase our costs and, therefore, the price of our products. We believe that our businesses are operating in compliance
in all material respects with applicable environmental laws; however, these laws and regulations have changed frequently
37
in the past and it is reasonable to expect additional and more stringent changes in the future. Accordingly, compliance with
existing or future laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations
and financial condition. If we fail to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations, governmental authorities
may seek to impose fines and penalties on us or to revoke or deny the issuance or renewal of operating permits and private
parties may seek damages from us. Under those circumstances, we might be required to curtail or cease operations, conduct
site remediation or other corrective action, or pay substantial damage claims.
Given that some of our product configurations run on fossil fuels, we may be negatively impacted by CO2-related changes
in applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, rules or the requirements of the incentive programs on which we and our
customers currently rely. Changes in any of the laws, regulations, ordinances or rules that apply to our installations and
new technology could make it illegal or more costly for us or our customers to install and operate our products at particular
sites. Additionally, our customers and potential customers’ energy procurement policies may prohibit or limit their
willingness to procure our products. Our business prospects may be negatively impacted if we are prevented from
completing new installations or our installations become more costly as a result of laws, regulations, ordinances, or
rules applicable to our products, or by our customers’ and potential customers’ energy procurement policies.
In addition, certain of our products benefit from federal, state and local governmental incentives, mandates or other
programs promoting clean energy generation. Any changes to or termination of these programs could reduce demand for
our products, impair sales financing, and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A negative government audit could result in an adverse adjustment of our revenue and costs and could result in civil
and criminal penalties.
Government agencies, such as the Defense Contract Audit Agency, routinely audit and investigate government contractors.
These agencies review a contractor’s performance under its contracts, cost structure, and compliance with applicable laws,
regulations, and standards. If the agencies determine through these audits or reviews that we improperly allocated costs to
specific contracts, they will not reimburse us for these costs. Therefore, an audit could result in adjustments to our revenue
and costs.
Further, although we have internal controls in place to oversee our government contracts, no assurance can be given that
these controls are sufficient to prevent isolated violations of applicable laws, regulations and standards. If the agencies
determine that we or one of our subcontractors engaged in improper conduct, we may be subject to civil or criminal
penalties and administrative sanctions, payments, fines, and suspension or prohibition from doing business with the
government, any of which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Exports of certain of our products are subject to various export control regulations and may require a license or
permission from the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Energy or other agencies.
As an exporter, we must comply with various laws and regulations relating to the export of products, services and
technology from the U.S. and with the laws and regulations of other countries having jurisdiction over our operations. We
are subject to export control laws and regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, the Export
Administration Regulation, and the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, which generally prohibit
U.S. companies and their intermediaries from exporting certain products, importing materials or supplies, or otherwise
doing business with restricted countries, businesses or individuals, and require companies to maintain certain policies and
procedures to ensure compliance. We are also subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits improper
payments to foreign governments and their officials by U.S. and other business entities. Under these laws and regulations,
U.S. companies may be held liable for their actions and actions taken by their strategic or local partners or representatives.
If we, or our intermediaries, fail to comply with the requirements of these laws and regulations, or similar laws of other
countries, governmental authorities in the United States or elsewhere, as applicable, could seek to impose civil and/or
criminal penalties, which could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
38
Risks Related to Our Need for Additional Capital
We will need to raise additional capital, and such capital may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If we do
raise additional capital utilizing equity, existing stockholders will suffer dilution. If we do not raise additional capital,
our business could fail or be materially and adversely affected.
The implementation of our business plan and strategy requires additional capital to fund operations as well as investment
by us in project assets. If we are unable to raise additional capital in the amounts required, on terms acceptable to us, or at
all, we will not be able to successfully implement our business plan and strategy. Our capital-intensive business model
increases the risk that we will not be able to successfully implement our plans if we do not raise additional capital in the
amounts required.
In addition, if we raise additional funds through further issuances of our common stock, or securities convertible into or
exchangeable for shares of our common stock, into the public market, including shares of our common stock issued upon
exercise of options or warrants, holders of our common stock could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity
securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of our then-existing capital stock. Any
debt financing secured by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and
other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue
business opportunities. If we cannot raise additional funds when we need them, our business and prospects could fail or
be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if additional funds are not secured in the future, we will have to modify,
reduce, defer or eliminate parts of our present and anticipated future projects, or sell some or all of our assets.
Risks Related to our Intellectual Property and Technology Licenses
We depend on our intellectual property, and our failure to protect that intellectual property could adversely affect our
future growth and success.
Failure to protect our existing intellectual property rights may result in the loss of our exclusivity or the right to use our
technologies. If we do not adequately ensure our freedom to use certain technology, we may have to pay others for rights
to use their intellectual property, pay damages for infringement, misappropriation, or other violation, or be enjoined from
using such intellectual property. We rely on patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright law to protect our intellectual
property.
We previously licensed certain of our carbonate fuel cell manufacturing intellectual property to POSCO Energy on an
exclusive basis in the South Korean and broader Asian markets, and pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement
with POSCO Energy, we have done so again, but this time on a limited, non-exclusive basis to enable module replacement
to POSCO Energy’s existing LTSA customers only. In addition, effective as of June 11, 2019, we entered into a license
agreement with EMTEC to facilitate the further development of our carbon capture platform (the “EMTEC License
Agreement”). Pursuant to the EMTEC License Agreement, we granted EMTEC and its affiliates a non-exclusive,
worldwide, fully-paid, perpetual, irrevocable, non-transferable license and right to use our patents filed on or before April
30, 2021, and any data, know-how, improvements, equipment designs, methods, processes and the like provided directly
by us or our affiliates to EMTEC or its affiliates under any agreement or otherwise, on or before April 30, 2021, to the
extent it is useful to research, develop and commercially exploit carbonate fuel cells in applications in which the fuel cells
concentrate carbon dioxide from external industrial and power sources and for any other purpose attendant thereto or
associated therewith. Such right and license is sublicensable to third parties performing work for or with EMTEC or its
affiliates, but is not otherwise sublicensable. Furthermore, on November 5, 2019, we entered into the EMTEC Joint
Development Agreement, pursuant to which we agreed to grant EMTEC and its affiliates a worldwide, non-exclusive,
royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, sub-licensable, non-transferable (subject to certain exceptions) right and license to
practice certain Company background intellectual property (to the extent not already licensed pursuant to the EMTEC
License Agreement) for new carbonate fuel cell technology in carbon capture applications and hydrogen applications. We
depend on POSCO Energy and EMTEC to also protect our intellectual property rights, but we cannot assure you that
POSCO Energy or EMTEC will do so.
As of October 31, 2024, we (excluding our subsidiaries) had 148 U.S. patents and 307 patents in other jurisdictions
covering our fuel cell technology (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple jurisdictions), with patents
directed to various aspects of our carbonate technology, SOFC technology, PEM fuel cell technology and applications
thereof. As of October 31, 2024, we also had 28 patent applications pending in the U.S. and 86 patent applications pending
39
in other jurisdictions. As of October 31, 2024, our subsidiary, Versa Power Systems, Ltd. (“Versa”), had 19 U.S. patents
and 68 international patents covering SOFC technology (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple
jurisdictions). As of October 31, 2024, Versa also had 13 pending U.S. patent applications and 30 patent applications
pending in other jurisdictions. In addition, as of October 31, 2024, our subsidiary, FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH, had
license rights to 2 U.S. patents and 7 patents outside the U.S. (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple
jurisdictions) for carbonate fuel cell technology licensed from Fraunhofer IKTS.
Some of our intellectual property is not covered by any patent or patent application and includes trade secrets and other
confidential and/or proprietary know-how, particularly as it relates to our manufacturing processes and engineering design.
In addition, some of our intellectual property includes technologies and processes that may be similar to the patented
technologies and processes of third parties. If we are found to be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating third-
party intellectual property, we do not know whether we will be able to obtain licenses to use such intellectual property on
acceptable terms, if at all. Our patent position is subject to complex factual and legal issues that may give rise to uncertainty
as to the validity, scope, and enforceability of a particular patent.
We cannot assure you that any of the U.S. or international patents owned by us (including our subsidiaries) or other patents
that third parties license to us will not be invalidated, circumvented, challenged, rendered unenforceable or licensed to
others, or that any of our owned or licensed pending or future patent applications will be issued with the breadth of claim
coverage sought by us or our licensors, if issued at all. In addition, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret
protection may be unavailable, limited or not applied for in certain foreign countries.
We also seek to protect our proprietary intellectual property, including intellectual property that may not be patented or
able to be patented, in part by confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, inventors’ rights agreements with our
subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, consultants, strategic business associates and employees. We cannot assure you that
these agreements will not be breached, that we will have adequate remedies for any breach or that such persons or
institutions will not assert rights to intellectual property arising out of these relationships. Certain of our intellectual
property has been licensed to us on a non-exclusive basis from third parties that may also license such intellectual property
to others, including our competitors. If our licensors are found to be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating
third-party intellectual property, we do not know whether we will be able to obtain licenses to use the intellectual property
licensed to us on acceptable terms, if at all.
If necessary or desirable, we may seek extensions of existing licenses or further licenses under the patents or other
intellectual property rights of others. However, we can give no assurances that we will obtain such extensions or further
licenses or that the terms of any offered licenses will be acceptable to us. The failure to obtain a license from a third party
for intellectual property that we use at present could cause us to incur substantial liabilities, and to suspend the manufacture
or shipment of products or our use of processes requiring the use of that intellectual property.
While we are not currently engaged in any material intellectual property litigation, we could become subject to lawsuits
in which it is alleged that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated the intellectual property rights of others
or commence lawsuits against others who we believe are infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating our rights or
violating their agreements to protect our intellectual property. Our involvement in intellectual property litigation could
result in significant expense to us, adversely affecting the development of sales of the challenged product or intellectual
property and diverting the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not that litigation is resolved in
our favor.
The U.S. government has certain rights relating to our intellectual property, including the right to restrict or take title
to certain patents.
Multiple U.S. patents that we own have resulted from government-funded research and are subject to the risk of exercise
of “march-in” rights by the government. March-in rights refer to the right of the U.S. government or a government agency
to exercise its non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable worldwide license to any technology developed under contracts
funded by the government if the contractor fails to continue to develop the technology. These “march-in” rights permit the
U.S. government to take title to these patents and license the patented technology to third parties if the contractor fails to
utilize the patents.
40
Risks Related to Our Common and Preferred Stock
Our stock price has been and could remain volatile.
The market price for our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile and subject to extreme price and volume
fluctuations in response to market and other factors, including the following, some of which are beyond our control:
x
failure to meet commercialization milestones;
x
failure to win contracts through competitive bidding processes, or the loss of project awards previously
announced or anticipated prior to entering into definitive contracts;
x
the loss of a major customer or a contract;
x
variations in our quarterly operating results from the expectations of securities analysts or investors;
x
downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or changes in general market conditions;
x
changes in the securities analysts that cover us or failure to regularly publish reports;
x
announcements of technological innovations or new products or services by us or our competitors;
x
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or
capital commitments;
x
additions or departures of key personnel;
x
investor perception of our industry or our prospects;
x
insider selling or buying;
x
demand for our common stock;
x
dilution from issuances of our common stock;
x
general market trends or preferences for non-fueled resources;
x
pandemics or any public health or safety issues in the regions where we operate;
x
general technological or economic trends; and
x
changes in the United States or foreign political environment and the passage of laws, including, tax,
environmental or other laws, affecting the product development business.
The closing price of our common stock on December 23, 2024 was $11.18 per share. There can be no assurance that the
current stock price will be maintained, and it is possible that our stock price could drop significantly. In the past, following
periods of volatility in the market price of their stock, companies have been the subject of securities class action litigation.
If we become involved in securities class action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of
management’s attention and resources and could harm our stock price, business prospects, results of operations and
financial condition.
41
Our failure to meet the continued listing standards of The Nasdaq Global Market could result in a delisting of our
common stock, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our common stock and subject us to
additional trading restrictions.
Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Market, which imposes continued listing requirements with respect to
listed securities, including a minimum bid price requirement. During fiscal year 2024, we received written notice from the
Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) notifying us that we were not in compliance
with Nasdaq’s continued listing standards. While we have subsequently regained compliance with such standards, there
can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq listing requirements, including the
minimum bid price requirement. If we fail to maintain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement or to meet the
other applicable continued listing requirements in the future and Nasdaq determines to delist our common stock, the
delisting could adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our common stock, reduce our ability to raise additional
capital and result in operational challenges and damage to investor relations and market reputation.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock could affect the market price of our common stock.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our
common stock, into the public market, including shares of our common stock issued upon exercise of options or warrants,
or perceptions that those sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and
our ability to raise capital in the future.
Provisions of Delaware and Connecticut law and of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may make a takeover
more difficult.
Provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (“Certificate of Incorporation”), and Third Amended and
Restated By-Laws (“By-laws”) and in Delaware and Connecticut corporate law may make it difficult and expensive for a
third-party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management and board
of directors. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public stockholders to benefit from a
change in control or change in our management and board of directors.
Our By-laws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for substantially all
disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a judicial forum deemed
favorable by the stockholder for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our By-laws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any derivative action
or proceeding brought on our behalf, any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty, any action asserting a claim against
us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our Certificate of Incorporation or our By-laws, any action
to interpret, apply, enforce, or determine the validity of our Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws, or any action asserting
a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s
ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder finds favorable for disputes against us or our directors,
officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other
employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our By-laws to be inapplicable
or unenforceable in such an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other
jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
The rights of our Series B Preferred Stock could negatively impact our cash flows and dilute the ownership interest of
our stockholders.
The terms of our Series B Preferred Stock also provide rights to their holders that could negatively impact us. Holders of
the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate of $50 per share per year, payable
either in cash or in shares of our common stock. To the extent the dividend is paid in shares of our common stock, additional
issuances could be dilutive to our existing stockholders and the sale of those shares could have a negative impact on the
price of our common stock. A share of our Series B Preferred Stock may be converted at any time, at the option of the
holder, into 0.0197 shares of our common stock (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $50,760 per share),
plus cash in lieu of fractional shares. Furthermore, the conversion rate applicable to the Series B Preferred Stock is subject
to additional adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events.
42
The Series B Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to payments upon liquidation, dividends,
and distributions.
The rights of the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock rank senior to our obligations to our common stockholders. Upon
our liquidation, the holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive $1,000.00 per share plus all accumulated
and unpaid dividends (the “Liquidation Preference”). Until the holders of Series B Preferred Stock receive the Liquidation
Preference with respect to their shares of Series B Preferred Stock in full, no payment will be made on any junior shares,
including shares of our common stock. The existence of senior securities such as the Series B Preferred Stock could have
an adverse effect on the value of our common stock.
General Risk Factors
Litigation could expose us to significant costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We are, or may become, party to various lawsuits, arbitrations, mediations, regulatory proceedings and claims, which may
include lawsuits, arbitrations, mediations, regulatory proceedings or claims relating to commercial liability, product
recalls, product liability, product claims, employment matters, environmental matters, breach of contract, intellectual
property, indemnification, stockholder suits, derivative actions or other aspects of our business. Litigation (including the
other types of proceedings identified above) is inherently unpredictable, and although we may believe we have meaningful
defenses in these matters, we may incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The costs of responding to or defending litigation
may be significant and may divert the attention of management away from our strategic objectives. There may also be
adverse publicity associated with litigation that may decrease customer confidence in our business or our management,
regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable.
Financial markets worldwide have experienced heightened volatility and instability which may have a material adverse
impact on our Company, our customers and our suppliers.
Financial market volatility can affect the debt, equity and project finance markets. This may impact the amount of financing
available to all companies, including companies with substantially greater resources, better credit ratings and more
successful operating histories than ours. It is impossible to predict future financial market volatility and instability and the
impact on our Company, and it may have a materially adverse effect on us for a number of reasons, such as:
x
The long-term nature of our sales cycle can require long lead times between application design, order booking
and product fulfillment. For such sales, we often require substantial cash down payments in advance of
delivery. For our generation business, we must invest substantial amounts in application design, manufacture,
installation, commissioning and operation, which amounts are returned through energy sales over long periods
of time. Our growth strategy assumes that financing will be available for us to finance working capital or for
our customers to provide down payments and to pay for our products. Financial market issues may delay,
cancel or restrict the construction budgets and funds available to us or our customers for the deployment of
our products and services.
x
Projects using our products are, in part, financed by equity investors interested in tax benefits, as well as by
the commercial and governmental debt markets. The significant volatility in the U.S. and international stock
markets causes significant uncertainty and may result in an increase in the return required by investors in
relation to the risk of such projects.
x
If we, our customers or our suppliers cannot obtain financing under favorable terms, our business may be
negatively impacted.
Weakness in the economy and other conditions affecting the financial stability of our customers could negatively impact
future sales of our products and our results of operations.
Our products require a long-term investment from our customers. Global inflationary pressures, particularly in the United
States, have increased recently to levels not seen in recent years. Should our customers be impacted by these pressures, it
could result in delays in purchasing decisions which could impact future sales of our products and our results of operations.
43
In addition, downturns in the worldwide economy, due to inflation, geopolitics, major central bank policy actions including
interest rate increases, public health crises, or other factors could also adversely affect our business.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by economic and political conditions globally and the effects of
these conditions on our customers’ businesses and levels of business activity.
Economic and political events in 2023 and 2024 have altered the landscape in which we and other U.S. companies operate
in a variety of ways. In response to inflationary pressures, the U.S. Federal Reserve has raised interest rates, resulting in
an increase in the cost of borrowing for us, our customers, our suppliers, and other companies relying on debt financing.
World events, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting economic sanctions, have impacted the global
economy. Prolonged inflationary conditions, high and/or increased interest rates, and additional sanctions or retaliatory
measures related to the Russia-Ukraine crisis, or other geo-political situations, could further negatively affect U.S. and
international commerce and exacerbate or prolong the period of high energy prices and supply chain constraints. At this
time, the extent and duration of these economic and political events and their effects on the economy and the Company
are impossible to predict.
Our future success will depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified management, technical, and other
personnel.
Our future success is substantially dependent on the services and performance of our executive officers and other key
management, engineering, scientific, manufacturing and operating personnel. The loss of the services of any such
personnel could materially adversely affect our business. Our ability to achieve our commercialization plans and to
increase production at our manufacturing facility in the future will also depend on our ability to attract and retain additional
qualified personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. Recruiting personnel for the fuel cell industry
is competitive. Our inability to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, or the departure of key employees, could
materially and adversely affect our development, commercialization and manufacturing plans and, therefore, our business
prospects, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our inability to attract and retain sufficient personnel
to quickly increase production at our manufacturing facility when and if needed to meet increased demand may adversely
impact our ability to respond rapidly to any new product, growth or revenue opportunities. Our inability to attract and
retain sufficient qualified personnel to staff our government or third party funded research contracts may result in our
inability to complete such contracts or terminations of such contracts, which may adversely impact financial conditions
and results of operations.
We are subject to risks inherent in international operations.
Since we market our products both inside and outside the U.S., our success depends in part on our ability to secure
international customers and our ability to manufacture products that meet foreign regulatory and commercial requirements
in target markets, as well as the ability to provide service to our international customers. We have limited experience
developing and manufacturing our products to comply with the commercial and legal requirements of international
markets. In addition, we are subject to tariff regulations and requirements for export licenses, particularly with respect to
the export of some of our technologies. We face numerous challenges in our international expansion, including the strain
any future growth may place on our management, service and operations teams and financial infrastructure, unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements and other geopolitical risks, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, longer accounts
receivable requirements and collections, greater bonding and security requirements, difficulties in managing international
operations, potentially adverse tax consequences, restrictions on repatriation of any earnings and the burdens of complying
with a wide variety of international laws. Any of these factors could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
We source raw materials and parts for our products on a global basis, which subjects us to a number of potential risks,
including the impact of export duties and quotas, trade protection measures imposed by the U.S. and other countries
including tariffs, potential for labor unrest, changing global and regional economic conditions and current and changing
regulatory environments. Changes to these factors may have an adverse effect on our ability to source raw materials and
parts in line with our current cost structure.
Although our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, we conduct our business and incur costs in the local currency of most
countries in which we operate. As a result, we are subject to currency translation and transaction risk. Changes in exchange
44
rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar could affect our net sales and cost of sales and could result in exchange
gains or losses. We cannot accurately predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations.
We could also expand our business into new and emerging markets, many of which have an uncertain regulatory
environment relating to currency policy. Conducting business in such markets could cause our exposure to changes in
exchange rates to increase, due to the relatively high volatility associated with emerging market currencies and potentially
longer payment terms for our proceeds. Our ability to hedge foreign currency exposure is dependent on our credit profile
with financial institutions that are willing and able to do business with us. Deterioration in our credit position or a
significant tightening of the credit market conditions could limit our ability to hedge our foreign currency exposure and,
therefore, result in exchange gains or losses.
Item 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 1C.
CYBERSECURITY
The Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) recognizes the critical importance of maintaining the trust and
confidence of our customers, business partners, and employees. The Board is actively involved in oversight of the
Company’s risk management program, and cybersecurity represents an important component of the Company’s overall
approach to enterprise risk management (“ERM”). The Company’s cybersecurity policies, standards, processes, and
practices are integrated into the Company’s ERM program and are based on recognized frameworks established by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology and other applicable industry standards. In general, the Company seeks to
address cybersecurity risks through a comprehensive, cross-functional approach that is focused on preserving operational
continuity and the confidentiality, security and availability of the information that the Company collects and stores by
identifying, preventing and mitigating cybersecurity threats and effectively responding to cybersecurity incidents when
they occur.
Risk Management and Strategy
As one of the critical elements of the Company’s overall ERM approach, the Company’s cybersecurity program is focused
on the following key areas:
x
Governance: As discussed in more detail under the heading “Governance,” the Board’s oversight of
cybersecurity risk management has been delegated to the Audit, Finance and Risk Committee of the Board (the
“Audit Committee”), which interacts with the Company’s ERM function, the Company’s Global Vice President
of Information Technology, the Company’s Director of Cyber Security, and other members of management and
relevant management committees and councils.
x
Collaborative Approach: The Company has adopted a cross-functional approach toward identifying,
prioritizing, and implementing the means to protect information technology systems and its employees from
cybersecurity threats. Additionally, the Company has established communications protocols and processes to
escalate cybersecurity incidents to engage management as needed to make timely decisions regarding incident
response, recovery, and any required disclosures.
x
Technical Safeguards: The Company uses an array of complex technologies and services to protect its
information systems and employees from cybersecurity threats. Examples include firewalls, intrusion prevention
and detection systems, anti-malware functionality, and access controls. These safeguards are evaluated and
improved through learnings derived from vulnerability assessments, penetration tests, and cybersecurity threat
intelligence.
x
Incident Response and Recovery Planning: The Company has defined and maintains cross-functional incident
response and recovery plans that will guide the Company’s response to a cybersecurity incident. These plans are
reviewed by senior management and are evaluated through tabletop exercises on a regular basis.
45
x
Third-Party Risk Management: The Company uses a risk-based approach to identify and manage cybersecurity
risks from third parties, including vendors and service providers. The focus of these efforts is to identify and
mitigate threats that could impact Company operations.
x
Education and Awareness: All new hires are required to complete mandatory cybersecurity awareness training
upon joining the Company. Follow-on training is then assigned to all employees on a regular basis. Training
assignments reinforce the Company’s security and information technology acceptable use policies, while also
helping employees identify and properly respond to cybersecurity threats. To help assess and maintain awareness,
training is supplemented with simulated phishing e-mails that are sent on a regular basis.
The Company engages third parties in the periodic assessment and testing of the Company’s policies, standards, processes
and practices that are designed to address cybersecurity threats and incidents. These efforts include a wide range of
activities, including penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, tabletop exercises, and other activities focused on
evaluating the effectiveness of our cybersecurity measures and planning. The results of such assessments influence the
Company’s tuning of cybersecurity policies, standards, processes and practices, the results of which are shared with the
Board and the Audit Committee.
Governance
The Board, in coordination with the Audit Committee, oversees the Company’s ERM process, including the management
of risks arising from cybersecurity threats. The Board and the Audit Committee each receive regular updates on
cybersecurity program key metrics, outstanding vulnerabilities, and emerging cybersecurity risks.
The Board and the Audit Committee also receive prompt and timely information regarding any cybersecurity incident that
meets established reporting thresholds, as well as ongoing updates regarding any such incident until it has been addressed.
The Global Vice President of Information Technology and Director of Cyber Security work in close partnership with the
Company’s senior leadership team to protect the Company’s information systems from cybersecurity threats and to
promptly respond to any cybersecurity incidents in accordance with the Company’s incident response and recovery plans.
This collaboration work includes activities in support of the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of
cybersecurity threats and incidents in real time and to report such threats and incidents to the Audit Committee and others
when appropriate.
The Global Vice President of Information Technology earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Management Information
Systems from Western Connecticut State University and has served in various roles in information technology and
information security for over 30 years, including serving in leadership roles of two large public companies. The Director
of Cyber Security earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Information Systems from Western New England University and has
extensive cybersecurity leadership experience, including expertise in threat data analytics, digital forensics, and data
recovery. Prior to joining the Company, the Director of Cyber Security formed and served as CEO of a successful incident
response and cybersecurity consulting firm.
Impacts of Cybersecurity Threats
To date, there have been no cyber security threats or incidents that have materially impacted our operations or financial
condition. However, as a result of risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of previous cybersecurity incidents,
we continue to allocate substantial resources to sustain and enhance our cyber security capabilities, which allocation of
resources has in turn materially affected our business strategy and processes. Despite these investments, we cannot be
certain that the protective measures and processes implemented will be successful or adequate to counter all current and
emerging risks and threats. A significant cybersecurity incident involving our systems and data, or those of our customers,
business partners or vendors, could have a materially adverse effect on our business strategy, results of operations and
financial condition.
46
Item 2.
PROPERTIES
The following is a summary of our offices and locations:
Square
Lease Expiration
Location
Business Use
Footage
Dates
Danbury, Connecticut
Corporate Headquarters,
Research and
Development, Sales,
Marketing, Service,
Purchasing and
Administration
72,000
Company owned
Torrington, Connecticut
Manufacturing and
Administrative
167,000
December 2030
(1)
Taufkirchen, Germany
Manufacturing and
Administrative
20,000
June 2025
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Manufacturing, Research
and Development
80,000
September 2028
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Storage
18,627
September 2028
(1) In November 2015, this lease was extended until December 2030, with the option to extend for three additional five-
year periods thereafter.
Item 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings, including, but not limited to, regulatory proceedings,
claims, mediations, arbitrations and litigation, arising out of the ordinary course of its business (“Legal Proceedings”).
Although the Company cannot assure the outcome of such Legal Proceedings, management presently believes that the
result of such Legal Proceedings, either individually, or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no material amounts have been accrued in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements with respect to these matters.
Item 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
47
PART II
Item 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
FuelCell Common Stock
Our common stock has been publicly traded since June 25, 1992. Our common stock trades under the symbol “FCEL” on
the Nasdaq Global Market.
On December 23, 2024, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $11.18 per share. As of
December 23, 2024, there were 20 holders of record of our common stock. This does not include the number of persons
whose stock is in nominee or “street” name accounts through brokers.
We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our Series B Preferred Stock prohibit the payment of dividends on
our common stock unless all dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock have been paid in full.
At 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 8, 2024, we effected a 1-for-30 reverse stock split, reducing the number of our
common shares outstanding on that date from 611,278,662 shares to approximately 20,375,932 shares. The number of
authorized shares of common stock remains unchanged at 1,000,000,000 shares and the number of authorized shares of
preferred stock remains unchanged at 250,000 shares. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon settlement of
outstanding restricted stock unit, performance stock unit and deferred stock unit awards were reduced proportionately in
connection with the reverse stock split. Additionally, the conversion rate of our Series B Preferred Stock (as defined
elsewhere herein), the exercise price of all outstanding options, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of all outstanding options, and the number of shares reserved for future issuance pursuant to our equity
compensation plans and employee stock purchase plan were all adjusted proportionately in connection with the reverse
stock split. All share and per share amounts, exercise prices, conversion rates and conversion prices presented herein have
been adjusted retroactively to reflect these changes.
FuelCell Preferred Stock
Information concerning the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock is incorporated herein by reference to Note 14.
“Redeemable Preferred Stock” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
48
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the annual change in the Company’s cumulative total stockholder return on its common
stock for the five fiscal years ended October 31, 2024 with the cumulative stockholder total return on (i) the Russell 2000
Index, (ii) our fiscal year 2024 peer group consisting of Standard Industry Classification Group Code 3690 companies
listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and New York Stock Exchange and a customized 15 company peer group (“2024 Peer
Group”), and (iii) our fiscal year 2023 peer group consisting of Standard Industry Classification Group Code 3690
companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and New York Stock Exchange and a customized 14 company peer group
(“2023 Peer Group”). The peer group was updated for fiscal year 2024 to align with the peer group selected by the
Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Board for the purposes of benchmarking executive
compensation. The 2024 Peer Group is consistent with the peer group expected to be disclosed in the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. It assumes $100.00 invested on October 31, 2019 with dividends
reinvested.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
See Part III, Item 12 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
49
Stock Repurchases
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by us or on our behalf of our common stock
during the periods indicated:
Period
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Programs
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
August 1, 2024 - August 31, 2024
—
$
—
—
—
September 1, 2024 - September 30, 2024
70
14.43
—
—
October 1, 2024 - October 31, 2024
147
9.87
—
—
Total
217
$
11.35
—
—
(1) Includes only shares that were surrendered by employees to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations in connection
with the vesting of stock-based compensation awards.
Item 6.
RESERVED
50
Item 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Company”, “FuelCell Energy”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to FuelCell
Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All tabular dollar amounts are in thousands. In certain instances, the capitalized terms
used in this section are defined elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.
Please see the section of this Annual Report entitled “Forward-Looking Statement Disclaimer” for a discussion of the
uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements, as well as the other risks set forth in our filings with
the SEC including those set forth under the section entitled “Item 1A Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.
Overview
At FuelCell Energy, our purpose is to enable a world powered by clean energy. We are a global leader in delivering a
variety of clean energy solutions to address some of the world’s most critical challenges around energy access, resilience,
reliability, affordability, safety and security. Since our inception, FuelCell Energy has been innovating and developing
commercial technologies that produce clean electricity, heat, clean hydrogen, and water. We are also proud to be at the
forefront of what we believe to be one of the most critical technologies required to achieve the world’s overall emissions
objectives: carbon capture. Today, we offer commercial technology that produces clean electricity, heat, clean hydrogen,
and water and is also capable of recovering and capturing carbon for utilization and/or sequestration, depending on product
configuration and application. We also continue to invest in product development and commercializing technologies that
are expected to add new capabilities to our platforms’ abilities to deliver hydrogen and long duration hydrogen-based
energy storage through our solid oxide technologies, as well as further enhance our existing platforms’ carbon capture
solutions.
We target a range of markets and applications with our products, including utilities and independent power producers, data
centers, wastewater treatment, commercial and hospitality, food and beverage, and microgrids, among others. We market
our products primarily in the United States, Europe and Korea, and we are also pursuing opportunities in other countries
around the world. We target for expansion and development markets and geographic regions that benefit from and value
clean distributed generation; are located where there are high energy costs, poor grid reliability, and/or challenged
transmission and distribution lines; can leverage the multiple value streams delivered by our platforms (electricity,
hydrogen, thermal, water, and carbon recovery); are aligned with regulatory frameworks that harmonize energy, economic
and environmental policies; and are committed to reducing their Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.
FuelCell Energy, headquartered in Danbury, Connecticut, was founded in 1969 as a New York corporation to provide
applied research and development services on a contract basis. We completed our initial public offering in 1992 and
reincorporated in Delaware in 1999. We began selling stationary fuel cell power plants commercially in 2003.
Recent Developments
The events described in this “Recent Developments” section relate, in part, to matters discussed in more detail below in
this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and/or in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
November 2024 Restructuring
On November 13, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a global restructuring of its operations in the U.S.,
Canada and Germany. The restructuring plan is aimed at reducing operating costs and better aligning its workforce with
the needs of the Company’s business and its customers. The restructuring plan included a reduction in our workforce of
approximately 13% or 75 employees in November 2024 and includes reduced spending for product development, overhead
and other costs. This followed a 4% or 17 employee reduction in workforce in September 2024. The restructuring plan
also includes the deferment and cancelation of certain previously planned capital and project expenditures. The
restructuring plan will not impact the way the Company supports existing customers, and the Company will continue to
51
deliver on replacement fuel cell modules and service and monitoring contracts. For more information about the
restructuring, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
Results of Operations
Management evaluates our results of operations and cash flows using a variety of key performance indicators, including
revenues compared to prior periods and internal forecasts, costs of our products and results of our cost reduction initiatives,
and operating cash use. These are discussed throughout the “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources”
sections. Results of Operations are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The following discussion and analysis of our Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources includes a
comparison of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2024 (“fiscal year 2024”) to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023
(“fiscal year 2023”). A similar discussion and analysis that compares fiscal year 2023 to the fiscal year ended October 31,
2022 (“fiscal year 2022”) can be found in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations,” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023.
52
Comparison of the Years Ended October 31, 2024 and 2023
Revenues and Costs of revenues
Revenues and costs of revenues for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows:
Year Ended October 31,
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
$
%
Total revenues
$ 112,132
$ 123,394
$ (11,262)
(9)%
Total costs of revenues
148,050
133,929
14,121
11%
Gross loss
$ (35,918)
$ (10,535)
$ (25,383)
241%
Gross margin
(32.0)%
(8.5)%
Total revenues for the year ended October 31, 2024 decreased $11.3 million, or 9%, to $112.1 million from $123.4 million
for the year ended October 31, 2023. Total costs of revenues for the year ended October 31, 2024 increased by
$14.1 million, or 11%, to $148.1 million from $133.9 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The Company’s gross
margin was (32.0)% in fiscal year 2024, as compared to a gross margin of (8.5)% in fiscal year 2023. A discussion of the
changes in product revenues, service agreements revenues, generation revenues and Advanced Technologies contract
revenues follows.
Product revenues
Product revenues, cost of product revenues and gross (loss) profit from product revenues for the years ended October 31,
2024 and 2023 were as follows:
Year Ended October 31,
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
$
%
Product revenues
$ 25,675
$ 19,589
$
6,086
31%
Cost of product revenues
39,582
12,878
26,704
207%
Gross (loss) profit from product revenues
$ (13,907)
$
6,711
$ (20,618)
(307)%
Product revenues gross margin
(54.2)%
34.3%
Product revenues for the year ended October 31, 2024 were $25.7 million compared to $19.6 million for the year ended
October 31, 2023. The increase in product revenues during the year ended October 31, 2024 was primarily driven by $18.0
million of revenue recognized under the Company’s long-term service agreement (“LTSA”) with Gyeonggi Green Energy
Co., Ltd. (“GGE”) for the replacement of 6 fuel cell modules for GGE’s 58.8 MW fuel cell power plant platform in
Hwasong-si, Korea. The increase also reflects $7.7 million of revenue recognized under the Company’s sales contract with
Ameresco, Inc., which was entered into during the second quarter of fiscal year 2024, pursuant to which the Company is
to provide a 2.8 MW platform to the Sacramento Sewer District.
Product revenues for the year ended October 31, 2023 relate to the December 2021 Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement
Agreement”) with POSCO Energy Co., Ltd. (“POSCO Energy”) and its subsidiary, Korea Fuel Cell Co., Ltd. (“KFC”),
which included an option to purchase an additional 14 modules (in addition to the 20 modules that were purchased by KFC
during fiscal year 2022). This option included a material right related to an extended warranty obligation for the modules.
The option was not exercised by KFC as of the expiration date of December 31, 2022 and, as a result, during the year
ended October 31, 2023, the Company recognized $9.1 million of product revenues, which represents the consideration
allocated to the material right if the option had been exercised. Product revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2023 also included $10.5 million of revenue that was recognized in October 2023 when certain of the modules previously
sold by the Company to KFC were installed by KFC at the power plants operated by Noeul Green Energy Co., Ltd. (“Noeul
Green Energy”), the Company entered into a new long-term service agreement to service these power plants (including
the modules installed by KFC), and the existing service agreement between KFC and Noeul Green Energy was
simultaneously terminated. Recognition of this revenue was previously constrained due to an obligation of the Company
to KFC related to modules previously sold by the Company to KFC. This obligation was relieved in conjunction with the
execution of the new long-term service agreement with Noeul Green Energy.
Cost of product revenues increased $26.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2024 to $39.6 million, compared to $12.9
million in the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the higher product sales in fiscal year 2024. Manufacturing
53
variances, primarily related to production volumes and unabsorbed overhead costs, totaled approximately $11.9 million
for the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to approximately $12.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2023.
Product revenues for the year ended October 31, 2024 generated a gross loss of $13.9 million compared to a gross profit
of $6.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The gross loss for the year ended October 31, 2024 was primarily due
to the manufacturing variances discussed above. The gross profit for the year ended October 31, 2023 is a direct result of
the product revenues recognized related to the expiration without exercise of KFC’s module purchase option, the release
of previously constrained product revenue and the fact that there were no corresponding costs associated with the
recognition of these revenues.
For the year ended October 31, 2024, we operated at an annualized production rate of approximately 27.7 MW, which is
a decrease from the annualized production rate of 32.7 MW for the year ended October 31, 2023. The reduction in the
annualized production rate for fiscal year 2024 is primarily due to moderating our production levels in our Torrington
facility as a result of market demand timing.
As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, there was $111.3 million and $0 million, respectively, of product backlog.
Service agreements revenues
Service agreements revenues and associated cost of revenues for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 were as
follows:
Year Ended October 31,
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
$
%
Service agreements revenues
$
9,969
$
49,084
$ (39,115)
(80)%
Cost of service agreements revenues
11,098
44,953
(33,855)
(75)%
Gross (loss) profit from service agreements revenues
$ (1,129)
$
4,131
$ (5,260)
(127)%
Service agreements revenues gross margin
(11.3)%
8.4%
Revenues for the year ended October 31, 2024 from service agreements decreased $39.1 million to $10.0 million from
$49.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2023 primarily because fewer module exchanges were performed during the
year ended October 31, 2024. During the year ended October 31, 2024, there were 2 new module exchanges – one new
module exchange at the plant at Hartford Hospital and one new module exchange at the plant at Bam Berlin. During the
year ended October 31, 2023 there were 15 new module exchanges – one new module exchange at the plant at Trinity
College, two new module exchanges at the plant in Woodbridge, CT, which originally achieved commercial operations in
fiscal year 2017, and 12 new module exchanges at the plants owned by Korea Southern Power Company in South Korea,
which achieved commercial operations in fiscal year 2018. The year ended October 31, 2023 also included a reduction in
service agreements revenues – specifically, a $2.1 million reduction in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2023 as a result of
higher future cost estimates related to future module exchanges compared to our prior estimates. Because we recognize
revenue on service contracts over time using a cost input method in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), we evaluate the cost estimates associated with each service contract periodically and adjust
revenue accordingly. In fiscal year 2023, we reviewed our cost estimates relating to our service contracts and identified
higher estimated costs than those that were previously estimated. These higher estimated costs in fiscal year 2023 were
due to the expectation that supply chain costs would remain high relative to prior years and that our production volumes
would remain low, resulting in an increase in expected module costs.
For the year ended October 31, 2024, accrued performance penalties under our service agreements totaled approximately
$1.5 million compared to approximately $1.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. Accrued performance
guarantees represent variable consideration for service contracts and accordingly are recorded as an offset to service
agreements revenues.
Cost of service agreements revenues decreased $33.9 million to $11.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2024 from
$45.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. Cost of service agreements revenues were lower for the year ended
October 31, 2024 than for the year ended October 31, 2023 primarily due to the fact that 15 new module exchanges
occurred during the year ended October 31, 2023, while there were fewer module exchanges during the year ended October
31, 2024, and also as a result of a net decrease relating to recognition of service agreement loss accrual during fiscal year
2024 of approximately $0.5 million. We record loss accruals for service agreements when the estimated cost of future
54
module exchanges and maintenance and monitoring activities exceeds the remaining unrecognized consideration.
Estimates for future costs on service agreements are determined by a number of factors including the estimated remaining
life of the module(s), used replacement modules available, and future operating plans for the power platform.
We work to continuously improve and mature our products and implement lessons learned into our product designs and
manufacturing process subsequent to introduction. We examine data related to module field performance, identify
improvement opportunities and invest in improvement initiatives with respect to our core molten carbonate technology.
We have identified improvement opportunities ranging from improved thermal management by reducing internal
temperature to improving the performance of our electrical balance of plant and implemented design changes to our
commercial platforms which are expected to improve overall product performance. As it relates to our fuel cell modules,
these improvements center around delivering more uniform temperature distribution within the cell stack within the
modules with the intent of improving output over the life of the modules to achieve the product’s expected design life.
Cost of service agreements revenues for both years includes planned maintenance activities, module exchanges and
continued investment in the service fleet in order to improve performance. Cost of service agreements includes
maintenance and operating costs and module exchanges.
Overall gross loss from service agreements revenues was $(1.1) million for the year ended October 31, 2024 which
decreased from a gross profit of $4.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The overall gross margin was (11.3)%
for the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to a gross margin of 8.4% in the comparable prior year period. Gross margin
was lower during the year ended October 31, 2024, primarily due to the fact that only 2 new module exchanges were
completed during the year, compared to the 15 new module exchanges completed during the year ended October 31, 2023
under service agreements with higher margins.
As of October 31, 2024, service agreements backlog totaled $174.2 million compared to $140.8 million as of October 31,
2023. This backlog is for service agreements of up to 20 years at inception and is expected to generate positive margins
and cash flows based on current estimates.
Generation revenues
Generation revenues and related costs for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows:
Year Ended October 31,
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
$
%
Generation revenues
$
49,975
$
37,508
$ 12,467
33%
Cost of generation revenues
79,861
62,913
16,948
27%
Gross loss from generation revenues
$ (29,886)
$ (25,405)
$ (4,481)
18%
Generation revenues gross margin
(59.8)%
(67.7)%
Revenues from generation for the year ended October 31, 2024 totaled $50.0 million, which represents an increase of
$12.5 million from revenue recognized of $37.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The increase reflects revenues
of $2.6 million generated by the Toyota project, which became operational during the first quarter of fiscal year 2024, and
revenue of $15.6 million generated by the Derby Projects (as defined below), both of which became operational in
December 2023, partially offset by lower revenue from other plants due to lower output resulting from routine maintenance
activities. Generation revenues for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 reflect revenue from electricity generated
under our power purchase agreements (“PPAs”), the sale of renewable energy credits, and additionally, for the year ended
October 31, 2024, the sale of hydrogen from the Toyota project.
Cost of generation revenues totaled $79.9 million for the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to $62.9 million for the
year ended October 31, 2023. The overall increase in cost of generation revenues is primarily related to the increased size
of the installed fleet, with the Toyota project and Derby Projects achieving commercial operations in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2024, as well as maintenance activities performed at the Tulare BioMAT and Groton projects during the first
quarter of fiscal year 2024. Both periods include expensed construction and gas costs related to the Toyota project, which
were $3.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2024, compared to $22.9 million for the year ended October 31, 2023.
The decrease in expensed construction and gas costs for the Toyota project is due to the plant becoming operational in
fiscal year 2024. In the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company net settled certain natural gas purchases
under previous normal purchase normal sale contract designations, which resulted in a change to mark-to-market
55
accounting. During the year ended October 31, 2024, the Company incurred a mark-to-market net loss of $6.9 million
related to natural gas purchase contracts compared to a mark-to-market net gain of $4.1 million for the year ended October
31, 2023.
Cost of generation revenues included depreciation and amortization of approximately $28.2 million and $20.3 million for
the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Cost of generation revenues for the year ended October 31, 2024
also includes an impairment charge of $1.3 million relating to project assets under construction relating to the PPAs for
Trinity College and for UConn (as defined elsewhere herein). The units to be installed at Trinity College and UConn are
first article units of our SOFC product. In reviewing our project cost estimates for these PPAs during the third quarter of
fiscal year 2024, it was determined that the expected project costs for these contracts would exceed the expected cash
flows and therefore an impairment charge was required. The impairment charge of $1.3 million represents the
unrecoverable costs incurred through October 31, 2024 for the Trinity College and UConn projects. Cost of generation
revenues for the year ended October 31, 2023 includes an impairment charge of $2.4 million relating to a project asset for
which a PPA was ultimately not awarded.
We currently have four projects with fuel sourcing risk for which there is no pass-through mechanism. The Toyota project
requires procurement of renewable natural gas (“RNG”), and our Derby, CT 14.0 MW project, our Derby, CT 2.8 MW
project, and our 7.4 MW Yaphank Project (as defined below) require natural gas. A two-year (through May of 2025) fuel
supply contract has been executed for the Toyota project. Six-year (through October 2029) fuel supply contracts have been
executed for the 14.0 MW and 2.8 MW projects in Derby, CT. We are currently in the midst of a seven-year fuel supply
contract (through September 2028) for our 7.4 MW Yaphank Project. The Company will look to extend the duration of
these contracts should market and credit conditions allow. If the Company is unable to secure fuel on favorable economic
terms, it may result in impairment charges to the Derby and Yaphank project assets and further charges for the Toyota
project asset.
The overall gross loss from generation revenues was $(29.9) million for the year ended October 31, 2024, which represents
an increase in gross loss of $4.5 million, from a gross loss of $(25.4) million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The
increase in gross loss from generation revenues is primarily related to the mark-to-market loss of $6.9 million recorded for
the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to a mark-to-market net gain of $4.1 million for the year ended October 31,
2023, offset by a decrease in construction and gas costs being expensed related to the Toyota project and higher margins
of the operating fleet for the year ended October 31, 2024.
As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, generation backlog totaled $0.8 billion and $0.9 billion, respectively.
56
Advanced Technologies contracts
Advanced Technologies contract revenues and related costs for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 were as
follows:
Year Ended October 31,
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
$
%
Advanced Technologies contract revenues
$
26,513
$
17,213
$
9,300
54%
Cost of Advanced Technologies contract revenues
17,509
13,185
4,324
33%
Gross profit from Advanced Technologies contracts
$
9,004
$
4,028
$
4,976
124%
Advanced Technologies contract gross margin
34.0%
23.4%
Advanced Technologies contract revenues increased to $26.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to
$17.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. Advanced Technologies contract revenues recognized under the Joint
Development Agreement between the Company and ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company f/k/a
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company (“EMTEC”) (which was originally effective as of October 31, 2019) (as
amended, the “EMTEC Joint Development Agreement”) were approximately $8.8 million during the year ended October
31, 2024, which was a decrease of $1.7 million compared to the year ended October 31, 2023. Revenues arising from the
purchase order received from Esso Nederland B.V. (“Esso”), an affiliate of EMTEC and Exxon Mobil Corporation, related
to the Rotterdam project were approximately $10.7 million during the year ended October 31, 2024, which was an increase
of $8.7 million compared to the year ended October 31, 2023. Advanced Technologies contract revenues recognized under
government and other contracts were approximately $7.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2024, which were $2.3
million higher compared to the year ended October 31, 2023.
Cost of Advanced Technologies contract revenues increased $4.3 million to $17.5 million for the year ended October 31,
2024, compared to $13.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. This increase is primarily a result of the higher level
of activity and the scope of work performed under the purchase order received from Esso described above, as well as the
higher level of activity performed under the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement during the year ended October 31,
2024, compared to the year ended October 31, 2023.
Advanced Technologies contracts for the year ended October 31, 2024 generated a gross profit of $9.0 million compared
to a gross profit of $4.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The increased gross profit was primarily due to the
higher revenues recognized under government and other contracts during the year ended October 31, 2024, compared to
the year ended October 31, 2023.
As of October 31, 2024, Advanced Technologies contract backlog totaled $36.0 million compared to $15.3 million as of
October 31, 2024.
Administrative and selling expenses
Administrative and selling expenses were $64.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2024, which increased slightly
from $64.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2023.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses decreased to $55.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to $61.0
million for the year ended October 31, 2023. The decrease is primarily due to a shift in engineering resource allocation
toward supporting the increase in the Advanced Technologies activities described above, partially offset by an increase in
spending, including spending for labor (including increased headcount) and materials, on the Company’s ongoing
commercial development efforts related to our solid oxide power generation and electrolysis platforms and carbon
separation and carbon recovery solutions.
Restructuring expense
Restructuring expense of $2.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2024 was a result of the Company’s workforce
reductions during the period, which represented approximately 4% of the Company’s global workforce and were intended
to reduce costs and align production levels with current levels of demand in a manner that is consistent with the Company’s
57
long-term strategic plan. The workforce was reduced at the North American production facility in Torrington, Connecticut,
as well as at corporate offices in Danbury, Connecticut and at remote locations. For more information about the
restructuring plan and the related workforce reductions that occurred in September and November 2024, please see Part
II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
Loss from operations
Loss from operations for the year ended October 31, 2024 was $158.5 million compared to $136.1 million for the year
ended October 31, 2023. This increase was primarily driven by the higher gross loss in the year ended October 31, 2024
of $35.9 million compared to the gross loss of $10.5 million in the year ended October 31, 2023. The increase in gross
loss is a result of higher gross loss from product revenues, service agreement revenues and generation revenues, partially
offset by higher gross profit from Advanced Technologies contracts. The gross loss is also offset by lower operating
expenses in the year ended October 31, 2024 compared to the year ended October 31, 2023, primarily related to lower
research and development expenses, offset by the restructuring expense recorded.
Interest expense
Interest expense for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 was $9.7 million and $7.2 million, respectively. Interest
expense for both periods includes interest on the OpCo Financing Facility (as defined elsewhere herein), which was entered
into in May 2023, and interest on the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Groton Subordinated Back
Leverage Loan Facility (in each case, as defined elsewhere herein), which were entered into in August 2023. Interest
expense for the year ended October 31, 2024 also includes interest on the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and
the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility (in each case, as defined elsewhere herein), which were entered into
in April 2024. Interest expense for the year ended October 31, 2023 also included interest associated with finance
obligations for failed sale-leaseback transactions and interest on the loans associated with the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project
which were extinguished in May 2023.
Interest income
Interest income was $13.7 million and $15.8 million for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Interest
income for the year ended October 31, 2024 represents $8.1 million of interest earned on money market investments and
$5.6 million of interest earned on U.S. Treasury Securities. Interest income for the year ended October 31, 2023 represents
$12.0 million of interest earned on money market investments and $3.8 million of interest earned on U.S. Treasury
Securities. The decrease in interest income during the year ended October 31, 2024 was primarily driven by lower interest
earned on money market investments relating to less unrestricted cash invested during the year ended October 31, 2024 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2023.
Gain on extinguishment of finance obligations and debt, net
The gain on extinguishment of finance obligations and debt, net was $15.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2023
and represents the gain on the payoff of the PNC Energy Capital, LLC (“PNC”) finance obligations (which occurred in
May 2023), offset by the write-off of debt issuance costs upon the repayment of the loans associated with the Bridgeport
Fuel Cell Project and the extinguishment of the PNC sale-leaseback transactions. There was no gain on extinguishment of
finance obligations and debt, net for the year ended October 31, 2024.
Other (expense) income, net
Other (expense) income, net was ($2.3) million and $4.7 million for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively. Other expense, net for the year ended October 31, 2024 primarily relates to a loss on the OpCo Financing
Facility interest rate swap derivative of $3.1 million offset by a gain of $1.0 million relating to refundable research and
development tax credits. Other income, net for the year ended October 31, 2023 reflects a gain on the OpCo Financing
Facility derivative contract of $3.3 million and $1.9 million of refundable research and development tax credits.
Provision for income taxes
We have not paid federal or state income taxes in several years due to our history of net operating losses, although we
have paid foreign income and withholding taxes in South Korea. Provision for income tax recorded for the years ended
58
October 31, 2024 and 2023 was $25 thousand and $0.6 million, respectively. The provision for income tax recorded for
the year ended October 31, 2023 reflects the realization of withholding taxes on customer deposits.
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is the result of allocating profits and losses to noncontrolling interests
under the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method. HLBV is a balance sheet-oriented approach for
applying the equity method of accounting when there is a complex structure, such as the flip structure of our tax equity
financings with Franklin Park 2023 FCE Tax Equity Fund, LLC (“Franklin Park”), East West Bancorp, Inc. (“East West
Bank”) and Renewable Energy Investors, LLC (“REI”).
For the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $0.9 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, for the LIPA Yaphank project tax equity financing transaction with REI.
For the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $(3.5) million and
($2.5) million for the Groton Project tax equity financing transaction with East West Bank.
For the year ended October 31, 2024, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $(28.3) million for the Derby
Projects tax equity financing transaction with Franklin Park. The loss is primarily driven by the Investment Tax Credit
(“ITC”) attributable to the noncontrolling interest for the 2023 tax year. The ITC reduces the noncontrolling interest’s
claim on hypothetical liquidation proceeds in the HLBV waterfall and is nonrecurring. The loss is also a result of
accelerated depreciation allocated to the noncontrolling interest under the HLBV method. The above noted items resulted
in a reduction in liquidation proceeds which drove the loss in the year ended October 31, 2024. There was no comparable
net loss for the year ended October 31, 2023, as the Derby Projects began operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2024.
Series B preferred stock dividends
Dividends recorded on our 5% Series B Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”)
were $3.2 million for each of the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023.
Net loss attributable to common stockholders and loss per common share
Net loss attributable to common stockholders represents the net loss for the period less the preferred stock dividends on
the Series B Preferred Stock. For the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, net loss attributable to common stockholders
was $129.2 million and $110.8 million, respectively, and loss per common share was $7.83 and $7.92, respectively. The
increase in the net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended October 31, 2024 is primarily due to the
lack of gain on extinguishment of finance obligations and debt, net during the year ended October 31, 2024 (compared to
the gain in the year ended October 31, 2023) and the increase in loss from operations during the year ended October 31,
2024, partially offset by the increased net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended October 31, 2024
compared to the year ended October 31, 2023. The net loss per common share for the year ended October 31, 2024
benefited from the higher number of weighted average shares outstanding due to share issuances since October 31, 2023.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview, Cash Position, Sources and Uses
Our principal sources of cash have been proceeds from the sale of our products and projects, electricity generation
revenues, research and development and service agreements with third parties, sales of our common stock through public
equity offerings, and proceeds from debt, project financing and tax monetization transactions. We have utilized this cash
to accelerate the commercialization of our solid oxide platforms, develop new capabilities to separate and capture carbon,
develop and construct project assets, invest in capital improvements and expansion of our operations, perform research
and development, pay down existing outstanding indebtedness, and meet our other cash and liquidity needs.
As of October 31, 2024, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $148.1 million compared to $250.0 million as of
October 31, 2023. During the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company invested in United States (U.S.)
Treasury Securities. The amortized cost of the U.S. Treasury Securities outstanding totaled $109.1 million as of October
31, 2024, compared to $103.8 million as of October 31, 2023 and is classified as Investments – short-term on the
59
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The outstanding U.S. Treasury Securities as of October 31, 2024 matured between
November 5, 2024 and November 29, 2024.
On April 10, 2024, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Open Market Sale Agreement,
dated July 12, 2022 (the “2022 Sales Agreement”), with Jefferies LLC, B. Riley Securities, Inc., Barclays Capital Inc.,
BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Canaccord Genuity LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC and Loop Capital Markets LLC (each, an “Agent” and together, the “Agents”) (the 2022 Sales Agreement
as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended Sales Agreement”), with respect to an at the market offering program
under which the Company may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering
price of up to $300.0 million (exclusive of any amounts previously sold under the 2022 Sales Agreement prior to its
amendment). Between April 10, 2024 (the date of the Amended Sales Agreement) and October 31, 2024, approximately
5.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock were sold under the Amended Sales Agreement at an average sale
price of $17.93 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $95.1 million before deducting sales commissions
and fees, and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $92.6 million after deducting sales commissions totaling
approximately $1.9 million and fees totaling approximately $0.6 million. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024,
approximately 1.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock were sold under the Amended Sales Agreement at an
average sale price of $11.23 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $21.5 million before deducting sales
commissions and fees, and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $20.8 million after deducting sales commissions
totaling approximately $0.4 million and fees totaling approximately $0.2 million. As of October 31, 2024, approximately
$204.9 million of shares remained available for sale under the Amended Sales Agreement. On December 27, 2024, the
Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Amended Sales Agreement, which removes certain representations and
warranties relating to the Company’s status as a well-known seasoned issuer. See Note 13. “Stockholders’ Equity and
Warrant Liabilities” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the 2022 Sales
Agreement and the Amended Sales Agreement.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Company closed on a project debt financing transaction with the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (“EXIM”) to support the Company’s obligations under the LTSA with GGE, pursuant
to which the Company is to supply GGE with forty-two 1.4-MW upgraded carbonate fuel cell modules to replace existing
units at GGE’s Hwaseong Baran Industrial Complex. In conjunction with this financing, the Company entered into a
promissory note and related security agreements securing the loan with equipment liens, resulting in net proceeds of
approximately $9.2 million. See Note 12. “Debt” for additional information regarding the EXIM financing facility.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Company (through one of its indirect subsidiaries) entered into three
related term loan facilities (which are referred to herein as the “Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility” and the “Derby
Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility”), resulting in net proceeds of $12.8 million. See Note 12. “Debt” for additional
information regarding the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan
Facility.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2023, the Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction with Franklin Park,
a subsidiary of Franklin Park Infrastructure, LLC, for two fuel cell power plant installations -- the 14.0 MW Derby Fuel
Cell Project and the 2.8 MW SCEF Fuel Cell Project, both located in Derby, Connecticut (collectively, the “Derby
Projects”). Franklin Park’s tax equity commitment with respect to the Derby Projects totaled $30.2 million. Of this amount,
approximately $9.1 million was received on October 31, 2023 and the remaining approximately $21.1 million was received
during the year ended October 31, 2024. In connection with the initial closing of this tax equity financing transaction in
fiscal year 2023, the Company paid closing costs of approximately $1.8 million, which included appraisal fees, title
insurance expenses and legal and consulting fees.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Company completed its technical improvement plan to bring the Groton
Project (defined elsewhere herein) to its rated capacity and the Groton Project reached its design rated output of 7.4 MW.
The Company achieved all conditions precedent required for the first annual funding from East West Bank under the tax
equity financing transaction between the Company and East West Bank and, as a result, the Company received a $4.0
million contribution during the year ended October 31, 2024 which is recorded as noncontrolling interest on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We believe that our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, expected receipts from our contracted backlog, funds received
upon the maturity of U.S. Treasury Securities, and release of short-term restricted cash less expected disbursements over
60
the next twelve months will be sufficient to allow the Company to meet its obligations for at least one year from the date
of issuance of the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
To date, we have not achieved profitable operations or sustained positive cash flow from operations. The Company’s
future liquidity, for fiscal year 2025 and in the long-term, will depend on its ability to (i) timely complete current projects
in process within budget, (ii) increase cash flows from its generation operating portfolio, including by meeting conditions
required to timely commence operation of new projects, operating its generation operating portfolio in compliance with
minimum performance guarantees and operating its generation operating portfolio in accordance with revenue
expectations, (iii) obtain financing for project construction and manufacturing expansion, (iv) obtain permanent financing
for its projects once constructed, (v) increase order and contract volumes, which would lead to additional product sales,
service agreements and generation revenues, (vi) obtain funding for and receive payment for research and development
under current and future Advanced Technologies contracts, (vii) successfully commercialize its solid oxide, hydrogen and
carbon capture platforms, (viii) implement capacity expansion for solid oxide product manufacturing, (ix) implement the
product cost reductions necessary to achieve profitable operations, (x) manage working capital and the Company’s
unrestricted cash balance and (xi) access the capital markets to raise funds through the sale of debt and equity securities,
convertible notes, and other equity-linked instruments.
We are continually assessing different means by which to accelerate the Company’s growth, enter new markets,
commercialize new products, and enable capacity expansion. Therefore, from time to time, the Company may consider
and enter into agreements for one or more of the following: negotiated financial transactions, minority investments,
collaborative ventures, technology sharing, transfer or other technology license arrangements, joint ventures, partnerships,
acquisitions or other business transactions for the purpose(s) of geographic or manufacturing expansion and/or new product
or technology development and commercialization, including hydrogen production through our carbonate and solid oxide
platforms and storage and carbon capture, sequestration and utilization technologies.
Our business model requires substantial outside financing arrangements and satisfaction of the conditions of such
arrangements to construct and deploy our projects to facilitate the growth of our business. The Company has invested
capital raised from sales of its common stock to build out its project portfolio. The Company has also utilized and expects
to continue to utilize a combination of long-term debt and tax equity financing (e.g., sale-leaseback transactions,
partnership flip transactions and the monetization and/or transfer of eligible investment and production tax credits) to
finance its project asset portfolio as these projects commence commercial operations, particularly in light of the passage
of the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022. The Company may also seek to undertake private placements of debt
securities to finance its project asset portfolio. The Company is also pursuing financing to support its commercial efforts,
which include deployment of modules to the repowering opportunities in the Korean market including the GGE project
(as defined elsewhere herein). The proceeds of any such financing, if obtained, may allow the Company to reinvest capital
back into the business and to fund other projects. We also expect to seek additional financing in both the debt and equity
markets in the future. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms if and when needed, or on terms acceptable to
us or our lenders, if we do not satisfy the conditions of our financing arrangements, if we spend more than the financing
approved for projects, if project costs exceed an amount that the Company can finance, or if we do not generate sufficient
revenues or obtain capital sufficient for our corporate needs, we may be required to further reduce or slow planned
spending, further reduce staffing, sell assets, seek alternative financing and take other measures, any of which could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.
Generation Operating Portfolio, Project Assets and Backlog
To grow our generation operating portfolio, the Company expects to continue to invest in developing and building turn-
key fuel cell projects, which will be owned by the Company and classified as project assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. This strategy requires liquidity and the Company expects to continue to have increasing liquidity requirements as
project sizes increase and more projects are added to backlog. We may commence building project assets upon the award
of a project or execution of a multi-year PPA with an end-user that has a strong credit profile. Project development and
construction cycles, which span the time between securing a PPA and commercial operation of the platform, vary
substantially and can take years. As a result of these project cycles and strategic decisions to finance the construction of
certain projects, we may need to make significant up-front investments of resources in advance of the receipt of any cash
from the sale or long-term financing of such projects. To make these up-front investments, we may use our working capital,
seek to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities, or seek other financing arrangements. Delays in
construction progress and completing current projects in process within budget, or in completing financing or the sale of
our projects may impact our liquidity in a material way.
61
We believe retaining ownership of our generation operating portfolio generally contributes to higher long-term cash flows
to the Company than if these projects had been sold. Our generation operating portfolio totaled 62.8 MW as of October
31, 2024. We expect generation revenue to continue to grow as additional projects achieve commercial operation, but this
revenue amount may also fluctuate from year to year depending on platform output, operational performance and
management and site conditions. The Company actively markets its products in order to grow this portfolio; however, the
Company may also sell certain projects to investors from time to time. As of October 31, 2024, the Company had two
projects representing an additional 1.3 MW in development, which projects are expected to generate operating cash flows
in future periods, if completed. We have worked with and are continuing to work with lenders and financial institutions to
secure construction financing, long-term debt, tax equity and sale-leasebacks for our project asset portfolio, but there can
be no assurance that such financing can be attained, or that, if attained, it will be retained and sufficient.
As of October 31, 2024, net debt outstanding related to project assets was $116.5 million. Future required payments,
inclusive of principal and interest, totaled $139.8 million as of October 31, 2024. The outstanding finance obligations
under our sale-leaseback transactions, which totaled $18.8 million as of October 31, 2024, include an embedded gain of
$10.5 million representing the current carrying value of finance obligations less future required payments, which will be
recognized at the end of the applicable lease terms should the Company repurchase the assets at the end of the term.
Generation Operating Portfolio
Our generation operating portfolio provides us with the full benefit of future cash flows, net of any debt service
requirements.
The following table summarizes our generation operating portfolio as of October 31, 2024:
Project Name
Location
Power Off-Taker
Rated
Capacity
(MW) (1)
Actual
Commercial
Operation Date
(FuelCell Energy
Fiscal Quarter)
PPA Term
(Years)
Central CT State
University
(“CCSU”)
New
Britain, CT
CCSU (CT University)
1.4
Q2 ‘12
15
Riverside Regional
Water
Quality Control Plant
Riverside,
CA
City of Riverside (CA Municipality)
1.4
Q4 '16
20
Pfizer, Inc.
Groton, CT
Pfizer, Inc.
5.6
Q4 '16
20
Santa Rita Jail
Dublin, CA
Alameda County, California
1.4
Q1 '17
20
Bridgeport Fuel Cell
Project
Bridgeport,
CT
Connecticut Light and Power Company
(CT Utility)
14.9
Q1 '13
15
Tulare BioMAT
Tulare, CA
Southern California Edison (CA Utility)
2.8
Q1 '20
20
San Bernardino
San
Bernardino,
CA
City of San Bernardino Municipal
Water Department
1.4
Q3 '21
20
LIPA Yaphank Project
Long Island,
NY
PSEG / LIPA, LI NY (Utility)
7.4
Q1 '22
20
Groton Project
Groton, CT
CMEEC (CT Electric Co-op)
7.4 (2)
Q1 '23
20
Toyota
Long Beach,
CA
Southern California Edison; Toyota
2.3
Q1 '24
20
Derby - CT RFP-2
Derby, CT
Eversource/United Illuminating (CT
Utilities)
14.0
Q1 '24
20
SCEF - Derby
Derby, CT
Eversource/United Illuminating (CT
Utilities)
2.8
Q1 '24
20
Total MW Operating:
62.8
(1) Rated capacity is the platform’s design rated output as of the date of initiation of commercial operations, except
with respect to the Groton Project.
(2) The Groton Project was previously operating (including as of the date of initiation of commercial operations) at
a reduced output of approximately 6.0 MW. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Groton Project
reached its design rated output of 7.4 MW.
62
Generation Projects in Process
During fiscal year 2022, we entered into a PPA with Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, for our 250 kW solid oxide
fuel cell power generation system. Power and heat produced from the platform will be used at Trinity’s campus in Hartford,
Connecticut to lower energy cost and enhance energy reliability and security.
In March 2024, we entered into a PPA with the University of Connecticut (“UConn”), in Storrs, Connecticut, for four 250
kW solid oxide fuel cell power generation systems totaling 1 MW. Power from these solid oxide fuel cells will be used by
UConn’s new Innovation Partnership Building. Any unused power will be exported to the grid under the fuel cell net
metering tariffs.
Fuel cell stacks for our solid oxide platform are manufactured at our manufacturing and research and development facility
in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and the Trinity and UConn projects will be fully assembled and integrated at our facilities in
Connecticut.
In November 2024, we announced a global restructuring of our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Germany that aims to
reduce operating costs, realign resources toward advancing the Company’s core technologies, and protect the Company’s
competitive position amid slower-than-expected-investments in clean energy. This restructuring plan also includes the
deferment and cancelation of certain previously planned capital and project expenditures. As a result of the restructuring
plan and the slowdown in the adoption of clean energy technology for the production of zero-carbon hydrogen and other
energy transition solutions, we have deferred the spending required to complete the Trinity and UConn projects. This
decision allows us to make further enhancements to stack life as well as other platform improvements. We do not currently
have estimated completion dates for these projects. The Company is currently in discussions with these customers
regarding changes to the previously scheduled installation dates. There can be no assurance that schedule changes can be
mutually agreed upon with these customers, which may result in termination of these projects. For more information about
our restructuring plan, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
Backlog
Backlog by revenue category is as follows:
x
Service agreements backlog totaled $174.2 million as of October 31, 2024, compared to $140.8 million as of
October 31, 2023. Service agreements backlog includes future contracted revenue from maintenance and
scheduled module exchanges for power plants under service agreements. During the year ended October 31,
2024, the Company entered into a LTSA with GGE with respect to GGE’s 58.8 MW fuel cell power platform
in Hwaseong-si, Korea (the “GGE Platform”). The contract value totaled approximately $159.6 million, of
which approximately $33.6 million is allocated to service and will be recognized as revenue as the Company
performs service at the GGE Platform over the term of the LTSA with GGE.
x
Generation backlog totaled $841.4 million and $872.1 million as of October 31, 2024 and October 31, 2023,
respectively. Generation backlog represents future contracted energy sales under contracted PPAs or approved
utility tariffs.
x
Product backlog totaled $111.3 as of October 31, 2024, compared to $0 million as of October 31, 2023. Product
backlog increased during the year ended October 31, 2024 primarily as a result of the LTSA with GGE which
added $126.0 million. Product backlog will be recognized as revenue over time as the Company completes
commissioning of the replacement modules. Commissioning of the first six 1.4-MW replacement fuel cell
modules was completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024 and as a result, the Company recognized
$18.0 million of product revenue. An additional 30 1.4-MW replacement fuel cell modules are expected to be
commissioned throughout the course of calendar year 2025, and the remaining six 1.4-MW replacement fuel
cell modules are expected to be commissioned in the first half of calendar year 2026.
x
Advanced Technologies contract backlog totaled $36.0 million as of October 31, 2024, compared to $15.3
million as of October 31, 2023. Advanced Technologies contract backlog represents remaining revenue under
our Joint Development Agreement with EMTEC, revenue from a purchase order originally valued at $11.6
million from Esso, an affiliate of Exxon Mobil Corporation and EMTEC, and remaining revenue under our
government projects.
63
Overall, backlog increased by approximately 13.1% to $1.16 billion as of October 31, 2024, compared to $1.03 billion as
of October 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the LTSA with GGE with respect to the GGE Platform. The GGE Platform
is comprised of 21 SureSource 3000 molten carbonate fuel cells (each a “Plant”). Each Plant is comprised of two 1.4-MW
carbonate fuel cell modules. Pursuant to the LTSA with GGE, GGE and the Company have agreed that (i) GGE will
purchase from the Company 42 1.4-MW carbonate fuel cell modules to replace existing fuel cell modules at the GGE
Platform, (ii) the Company will provide certain balance of plant replacement components if and to the extent the parties
reasonably determine existing components should be replaced, and (iii) the Company will provide long term operations
and maintenance services for the GGE Platform. The total amount payable by GGE under the LTSA for the 42 replacement
fuel cell modules, balance of plant replacement components, and service is $159.6 million, with payments to be made over
time as such replacement fuel cell modules are commissioned and the service obligations under the LTSA for such Plants
commence. This amount was recorded as backlog concurrent with the execution of the LTSA with GGE on May 28, 2024,
but such amount has been reduced by $19.9 million of revenue recognized as product and service revenues under the
LTSA since May 28, 2024.
Backlog also increased due to the new Advanced Technologies contract backlog as a result of the purchase order received
from Esso during the first quarter of fiscal year 2024 and additional Advanced Technologies contract backlog related to
Amendment No. 5 to the Joint Development Agreement between the Company and EMTEC entered into in April 2024,
partially offset by revenue recognition under product, generation, service and Advanced Technologies agreements since
October 31, 2023.
Backlog represents definitive agreements executed by the Company and our customers. Projects for which we have an
executed PPA are included in generation backlog, which represents future revenue under long-term PPAs. The Company’s
ability to recognize revenue in the future under a PPA is subject to the Company’s completion of construction of the project
covered by such PPA. Should the Company not complete the construction of the project covered by a PPA, it will forgo
future revenues with respect to the project and may incur penalties and/or impairment charges related to the project.
Projects sold to customers (and not retained by the Company) are included in product sales and service agreements backlog,
and the related generation backlog is removed upon sale. Together, the service and generation portion of backlog had a
weighted average term of approximately 16 years as of October 31, 2024, with weighting based on the dollar amount of
backlog and utility service contracts of up to 20 years in duration at inception.
Factors that may impact our liquidity
Factors that may impact our liquidity in fiscal year 2025 and beyond include:
x
The Company’s cash on hand and access to additional liquidity. As of October 31, 2024, unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents totaled $148.1 million and short-term investments in U.S. Treasury Securities totaled $109.1
million. Such securities matured between November 5, 2024 and November 29, 2024.
x
We bid on large projects in diverse markets that can have long decision cycles and uncertain outcomes.
x
We manage production rate based on expected demand and project schedules. Changes to production rate take
time to implement. We operated at an annualized production rate of 27.7 MW for the fiscal year ended October
31, 2024, compared to an annualized production rate of approximately 32.7 MW for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2023. This reduction in annualized production rate is primarily due to moderating our production
levels in our Torrington facility as a result of market demand timing.
64
x
As project sizes and the number of projects evolve, project cycle times may increase. We may need to make
significant up-front investments of resources in advance of the receipt of any cash from the financing or sale
of our projects. These amounts include development costs, interconnection costs, costs associated with posting
of letters of credit, bonding or other forms of security, and engineering, permitting, legal, and other expenses.
x
The amount of accounts receivable and unbilled receivables as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 was $76.9
million ($28.3 million of which is classified as “Other assets”) and $45.9 million ($25.8 million of which is
classified as “Other assets”), respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable represent revenue that has been
recognized in advance of billing the customer under the terms of the underlying contracts. Such costs have
been funded with working capital and the unbilled amounts are expected to be billed and collected from
customers once we meet the billing criteria under the contracts. Our accounts receivable balances may
fluctuate as of any balance sheet date depending on the timing of individual contract milestones and progress
on completion of our projects.
x
The amount of total inventory as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 was $116.4 million ($2.7 million is classified
as long-term inventory) and $91.8 million ($7.3 million is classified as long-term inventory), respectively,
which includes work in process inventory totaling $80.5 million and $55.6 million, respectively. Work in
process inventory can generally be deployed rapidly while the balance of our inventory requires further
manufacturing prior to deployment. To execute on our business plan, we must produce fuel cell modules and
procure balance of plant (“BOP”) components in required volumes to support our planned construction
schedules and potential customer contractual requirements. As a result, we may manufacture modules or
acquire BOP components in advance of receiving payment for such activities. This may result in fluctuations
in inventory and cash as of any given balance sheet date.
x
The amount of total project assets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 was $242.1 million and $258.1 million,
respectively. Project assets consist of capitalized costs for fuel cell projects that are operating and producing
revenue or are under construction. Project assets as of October 31, 2024 consisted of $242.0 million of
completed, operating installations and $0.2 million of projects in development. As of October 31, 2024, we
had 62.8 MW of operating project assets that generated $50.0 million of revenue for the year ended October
31, 2024.
x
As of October 31, 2024, the Company had 1.3 MW of projects under development and construction that were
previously expected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2026. We previously estimated the remaining
investment to build out this portfolio of project assets to be approximately $25.0 million through 2026. As a
result of our restructuring plan, we have deferred spending required to complete the build out of these projects
and, as a result, do not currently have estimated completion dates for such projects. The Company is currently
in discussions with these customers regarding changes to the previously scheduled installation dates. There
can be no assurance that schedule changes can be mutually agreed upon with these customers, which may
result in termination of these projects. For more information about our restructuring plan and the workforce
reductions in September and November 2024, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22
— Subsequent Events.
Beyond the projects under development and construction, the Company estimates investments in long-term
project assets to be in the range of $3.0 million to $6.0 million in fiscal year 2025.
x
Certain of our PPAs for project assets in our generation operating portfolio expose us to fluctuating fuel price
risks as well as the risk of being unable to procure the required amounts of fuel and the lack of alternative
available fuel sources. We seek to mitigate our fuel risk using strategies including: (i) fuel cost reimbursement
mechanisms in our PPAs to allow for pass through of fuel costs (full or partial) where possible, which we have
done with our 14.9 MW operating project in Bridgeport, CT; (ii) procuring fuel under fixed price physical
supply contracts with investment grade counterparties, which we have done for twenty years for our Tulare
BioMAT project, the initial seven years of the twenty-year PPA for our LIPA Yaphank Project (through
September of 2028), six years of the twenty-year PPA for our 14.0 MW and 2.8 MW Derby projects (through
October of 2029), and the initial two years of the twenty-year hydrogen power purchase agreement for our
Toyota project (through May of 2025); and (iii) potentially entering into future financial hedges with
investment grade counterparties to offset potential negative market fluctuations. The Company does not take
a fundamental view on natural gas or other commodity pricing and seeks commercially available means to
65
reduce commodity exposure. If the Company is unable to secure fuel on favorable economic terms, the
Company may incur impairment charges.
x
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment are expected to range between $20.0 million and $25.0 million
for fiscal year 2025. These amounts are in addition to the capital expenditures and commitments made by the
Company in fiscal year 2024 to upgrade our manufacturing facilities, including payments for certain
equipment necessary for the expansion of solid oxide manufacturing capacity at our Calgary facility. We are
also increasing the carbonate capabilities in our Torrington facility for expected growth in carbon capture and
recovery including completion of the carbon recovery demonstration plant.
During the year ended October 31, 2024, cash payments for capital expenditures totaled approximately $47.7
million.
Our current carbonate and solid oxide platform capacity expansion plans are as follows:
Carbonate Platform:
At this time, the maximum annualized capacity (module manufacturing, final
assembly, testing and conditioning) is 100 MW per year under the Torrington facility’s current configuration
when fully utilized. The Torrington facility is sized to accommodate the eventual annualized production
capacity of up to 200 MW per year with additional capital investment in machinery, equipment, tooling,
labor and inventory.
The Company continues to invest in capability with the goal of reducing production bottlenecks and driving
productivity, including investments in automation, laser welding, and the construction of additional
integrated conditioning capacity. The Company also constructed a SureSource 1500 in Torrington during
fiscal year 2022, which operates as a testing facility for qualifying new supplier components and performance
testing and validation of continued platform innovations, including carbon recovery. During fiscal years 2023
and 2024, the Company made investments to add engineered carbon separation capability to the onsite
SureSource 1500. This addition is expected to be completed in the first half of calendar year 2025. This
product enhancement will allow potential customers to observe the operating plant and, given the targeted
market of food and beverage companies, will allow for the sampling and testing of separated CO2 to verify
quantity, quality or purity requirements. In addition, the Company recently began manufacturing carbonate
modules optimized for direct flue gas carbon capture at the Torrington facility.
Solid Oxide Platforms: The Company continues to invest in product development and manufacturing scale
up for two solid oxide platforms: power generation and electrolysis. Both platforms are based on the
Company’s differentiated thin, lightweight, electrode supported cells, which are configured into compact,
lightweight stacks. The thin electrode structure minimizes electrolyte materials, leading to very low use of
rare earth minerals compared to other solid oxide technologies, and the electrodes do not require the platinum
group materials that lower temperature systems require. The thin electrodes also have very low electrical
resistance, leading to high efficiency in both power generation and electrolysis applications. We provide
integrated products with the goal of offering complete customer solutions. Our electrolysis platform includes
integrated steam generation and hydrogen drying systems, so it will be fed with water, not steam, and will
provide dried hydrogen. A steam supply can optionally be used to increase the electrical efficiency of the
system from 90% to 100% (based on higher heating value). Our power generation platform can operate on
natural gas, biogas, hydrogen, or fuel blends, and is capable of combined heat and power operation at up to
80% efficiency (based on lower heating value).
During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, Versa Power Systems Ltd. (“Versa Ltd.”), a
subsidiary of FuelCell Energy, entered into lease expansions, extensions and amending agreements which
expanded the space leased by Versa Ltd. in Calgary, Alberta, Canada to include an additional approximately
68,000 square feet, for a total of approximately 100,000 square feet of space. The Company took possession
of part of the additional space on April 1, 2023 and took possession of the rest of the additional space on
June 1, 2023 after certain leasehold improvements were made to support increased manufacturing. In
addition, long-lead process equipment has been ordered to facilitate the expansion of manufacturing capacity
for the solid oxide platforms in Calgary. Upon the completion of the Calgary capacity expansion, we believe
that the total annualized solid oxide electrolysis cell (“SOEC”) manufacturing capacity could potentially be
increased to up to 80 MW per year. However, in November 2024, we announced a global restructuring of
our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Germany that aims to reduce operating costs, realign resources toward
66
advancing the Company’s core technologies, and protect the Company’s competitive position amid slower-
than-expected-investments in clean energy. This restructuring plan also includes the deferment and
cancelation of certain previously planned capital and project expenditures. As a result of this restructuring
plan, we have deferred the capital spending required to complete the Calgary expansion and do not currently
have an estimated completion date for this project. For more information about our restructuring plan, please
see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
The Company is also exploring adding certain solid oxide manufacturing capabilities to its Torrington,
Connecticut production facility. Decisions with respect to the Company’s investment in facility expansion
will be paced by market demand.
Lastly, the Company is in the process of examining or actively applying for various financial programs
offered by both Canada and the United States to provide subsidies, investment tax credits and other assistance
with the goal of expanding capacity for clean energy manufacturing.
x
Company-funded research and development expenses are expected to be in the range between $40.0 million
and $45.0 million for fiscal year 2025. During the year ended October 31, 2024, we incurred a total of $55.4
million of Company-funded research and development expenses as we continued to focus on accelerating the
commercialization of our distributed power generation, distributed hydrogen generation and carbon capture
solutions. The Company continues to advance its solid oxide technology platform in collaboration with Idaho
National Laboratories on the high-efficiency electrolysis system demonstration. This demonstration program
is being undertaken in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy and is intended as a steppingstone for
a system level field demonstration of the Company’s high efficiency solid oxide technology platform. The
Company continues to advance the development of its solid oxide technology platforms to support growing
applications in the distributed power and hydrogen generation market segments. Finally, the Company will
continue investing in product enhancements of our carbonate platform including advancing commercial
demonstrations of carbon capture and carbon recovery platforms.
x
Under the terms of certain contracts, the Company will provide performance security for future contractual
obligations. As of October 31, 2024, we had pledged approximately $60.8 million of our cash and cash
equivalents as collateral for performance security and for letters of credit for certain banking requirements and
contracts. This balance may increase with a growing backlog and installed fleet.
x
The Company’s ability to continue to implement cost saving measures if sales activities do not occur when
expected. As previously disclosed, the Company made certain downward adjustments to expected spending
for fiscal year 2024 as a result of the pace of market development and due to the need to continue focusing on
optimizing and improving the Company’s solid oxide technology, including its stack life, performance and
efficiency. The Company expects to continue to limit spending in fiscal year 2025. In November 2024, we
announced a global restructuring of our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Germany that aims to reduce
operating costs, realign resources toward advancing the Company’s core technologies, and protect the
Company’s competitive position amid slower-than-expected-investments in clean energy. This restructuring
plan also includes the deferment and cancelation of certain previously planned capital and project
expenditures. For more information about our restructuring plan and workforce reductions in September and
November 2024, please see Part II, Item 8, Note 4 — Restructuring and Note 22 — Subsequent Events.
Depreciation and Amortization
As the Company builds project assets and makes capital expenditures, depreciation and amortization expenses are expected
to increase. For the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, depreciation and amortization totaled $36.2 million and $25.4
million, respectively (of these totals, approximately $28.2 million and $20.3 million for the years ended October 31, 2024
and 2023, respectively, relate to depreciation of project assets in our generation operating portfolio and amortization of a
generation intangible asset).
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $208.9 million as of October 31, 2024 compared
to $299.6 million as of October 31, 2023. As of October 31, 2024, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents was $148.1
67
million compared to $250.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents as of October 31, 2023. As of October 31,
2024, restricted cash and cash equivalents was $60.8 million, of which $12.2 million was classified as current and $48.6
million was classified as non-current, compared to $49.6 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents as of October 31,
2023, of which $5.2 million was classified as current and $44.5 million was classified as non-current.
The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows:
Year Ended October 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Consolidated Cash Flow Data:
Net cash used in operating activities
$ (152,906) $ (140,250)
$ (112,167)
Net cash used in investing activities
(60,049)
(192,365)
(46,651)
Net cash provided by financing activities
122,151
151,067
180,583
Effects on cash from changes in foreign currency rates
111
80
(933)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$ (90,693) $ (181,468)
$
20,832
The key components of our cash inflows and outflows were as follows:
Operating Activities – Net cash used in operating activities was $152.9 million during fiscal year 2024, compared to net
cash used in operating activities of $140.3 million in fiscal year 2023 and net cash used in operating activities of $112.2
million in fiscal year 2022.
Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal year 2024 was primarily a result of the net loss of $156.8 million,
increases in inventories of $29.2 million, unbilled receivables of $23.0 million, accounts receivable of $7.9 million and
other assets of $5.4 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $1.0 million, partially offset by increases in accrued
liabilities of $4.7 million and accounts payable of $4.1 million and non-cash adjustments of $63.0 million.
Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal year 2023 was primarily a result of the net loss of $108.1 million,
increases in unbilled receivables of $21.9 million and other assets of $13.1 million and decreases in deferred revenue of
$22.3 million and accrued liabilities of $4.5 million, partially offset by decreases in inventories of $4.7 million and
accounts receivable of $1.1 million, an increase in accounts payable of $3.0 million and non-cash adjustments of $22.0
million.
Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal year 2022 was primarily a result of the net loss of $147.2 million,
increases in inventories of $28.1 million, other assets of $2.1 million and unbilled receivables of $0.2 million and a
decrease in deferred revenue of $11.3 million, partially offset by decreases in accounts receivable of $9.2 million, increases
in accrued liabilities of $24.6 million and accounts payable of $6.3 million, non-cash adjustments of $35.0 million and
cash adjustments of $1.6 million.
Investing Activities – Net cash used in investing activities was $60.0 million during fiscal year 2024, compared to
$192.4 million in fiscal year 2023 and $46.7 million in fiscal year 2022.
Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal year 2024 included $835.7 million for the purchase of U.S. Treasury
Securities, $47.7 million of capital expenditures and $11.8 million of project asset expenditures, partially offset by funds
received from the maturity of U.S. Treasury Securities of $835.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal year 2023 included $299.1 million for the purchase of U.S. Treasury
Securities, $53.0 million of project asset expenditures and $39.4 million of capital expenditures, partially offset by funds
received from the maturity of U.S. Treasury Securities of $199.1 million.
Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal year 2022 included $25.6 million of project asset expenditures and $21.1
million of capital expenditures.
Financing Activities – Net cash provided by financing activities was $122.2 million during fiscal year 2024, compared to
$151.1 million in fiscal year 2023 and $180.6 million in fiscal year 2022.
68
Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal year 2024 resulted from $23.1 million of proceeds from debt
financings, $92.6 million of net proceeds from sales of common stock and $25.1 million of contributions received from
the sale of a noncontrolling interest, offset by debt repayments of $11.7 million, payments of debt issuance costs of $1.2
million, payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards of $1.1 million, payment of $3.2 million in
preferred dividends to the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock and distribution to noncontrolling interests of $1.6
million.
Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal year 2023 resulted from $100.5 million of proceeds from debt
financings, $97.4 million of net proceeds from sales of common stock and $9.1 million of contributions received from the
sale of a noncontrolling interest, offset by debt repayments of $47.8 million, payments of debt issuance costs of $3.5
million, payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards of $0.9 million, payment of $3.2 million in
preferred dividends to the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock and distribution to noncontrolling interests of $0.6
million.
Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal year 2022 resulted from $183.6 million of net proceeds from sales
of common stock and $11.9 million of net contributions received from the sale of a noncontrolling interest in the LIPA
Yaphank Project, partially offset by debt repayments of $9.5 million, payment for taxes related to net share settlement of
equity awards of $1.9 million, payment of $3.2 million of preferred dividends to the holders of our Series B Preferred
Stock and distribution to noncontrolling interests of $0.3 million.
Sources and Uses of Cash and Investments
In order to consistently produce positive cash flow from operations, we need to increase order flow to support higher
production levels, leading to lower costs on a per unit basis. We also continue to invest in new product and market
development and, as a result, we are not generating positive cash flow from our operations. Our operations are funded
primarily through cash generated from product sales, service contracts, generation assets and Advanced Technologies
contracts, as well as sales of equity and equity linked securities, issuances of corporate and project level debt, and
monetization of technology through licenses.
Commitments and Significant Contractual Obligations
The following table provides a summary of our significant future commitments and contractual obligations as of
October 31, 2024 and the related payments by fiscal year:
Payments Due by Period
(dollars in thousands)
Total
Less than
1 Year
1 – 3
Years
3 – 5
Years
More than
5 Years
Purchase commitments (1)
$ 90,826
$ 62,415
$ 12,602
$
2,818
$ 12,991
Term loans (principal and interest)
150,359
18,772
33,624
30,633
67,330
Operating lease commitments (2)
18,234
1,361
2,781
2,169
11,923
Sale-leaseback finance obligations (3)
8,264
1,480
2,740
2,759
1,285
Natural gas and biomethane gas supply contracts (4)
50,571
17,689
17,682
15,200
-
Series B Preferred dividends payable (5)
-
-
-
-
-
Totals
$ 318,254
$ 101,717
$ 69,429
$ 53,579
$ 93,529
(1) Purchase commitments with suppliers for materials, supplies and services incurred in the normal course of business.
(2) Future minimum lease payments on operating leases.
(3) Represents payments due under sale-leaseback transactions and related financing agreements between certain of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries and Crestmark Equipment Finance (“Crestmark”). Lease payments for each lease under
these financing agreements are generally payable in fixed quarterly installments over a 10-year period.
(4) During fiscal year 2020, the Company entered into a 7-year natural gas contract for the Company’s LIPA Yaphank
project with an estimated annual cost per year of $2.0 million, under which service began on December 7, 2021.
During fiscal year 2023, the Company entered into a 2-year Biomethane gas contract for the Company’s Toyota
project, under which service began on May 1, 2023. Also, during fiscal year 2023, the Company entered into (a) a 6-
year natural gas contract for the Company’s 14.0 MW Derby project, under which service began on June 1, 2023, and
(b) a 6-year natural gas contract for the Company’s 2.8 MW SCEF Derby project, under which service began in
November 2023. The costs of the contracts are expected to be offset by generation revenues.
69
(5) We pay $3.2 million in annual dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock, if and when declared. The $3.2 million
annual dividend payment, if dividends are declared, has not been included in this table as we cannot reasonably
determine when or if we will be able to convert the Series B Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock. We
may, at our option, convert these shares into the number of shares of our common stock that are issuable at the then
prevailing conversion rate if the closing price of our common stock exceeds 150% of the then prevailing conversion
price ($50,760 per share as of October 31, 2024) for 20 trading days during any consecutive 30 trading day period.
Outstanding Loans as of October 31, 2024
A discussion of the key terms and conditions of the loans outstanding as of October 31, 2024 is included in Note 12.
“Debt” to the consolidated financial statements and is incorporated by reference herein. The information included under
the headings “EXIM Financing,” “OpCo Financing Facility,” “Derby Back Leverage Financing,” “Groton Back Leverage
Financing,” “State of Connecticut Loan,” and “Finance obligations for sale-leaseback agreements” in Note 12. “Debt” to
the consolidated financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.
Restricted Cash
As of October 31, 2024, we have pledged approximately $60.8 million of our cash and cash equivalents as performance
security and for letters of credit for certain banking requirements and contracts. As of October 31, 2024, outstanding letters
of credit totaled $14.2 million. These expire on various dates through October 2029. Under the terms of certain contracts,
we will provide performance security for future contractual obligations. The restricted cash balance as of October 31, 2024
also included $2.9 million primarily to support obligations under the power purchase and service agreements related to
Crestmark sale-leaseback transactions, $12.9 million relating to future obligations associated with the Groton Senior Back
Leverage Loan Facility, the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility, the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan
Facility, and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility, and $24.7 million relating to future obligations
associated with the OpCo Financing Facility. Refer to Note 12. “Debt” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the
year ended October 31, 2024 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of the
Company’s restricted cash balance.
Power purchase agreements
Under the terms of our PPAs, customers agree to purchase power or other value streams delivered such as hydrogen, steam,
water, and/or carbon from the Company’s fuel cell power platforms at negotiated rates. Electricity rates are generally a
function of the customers’ current and estimated future electricity pricing available from the grid. We are responsible for
all operating costs necessary to maintain, monitor and repair our fuel cell power platforms. Under certain agreements, we
are also responsible for procuring fuel, generally natural gas or biogas, to run our fuel cell power platforms. In addition,
under certain agreements, we are required to produce minimum amounts of power under our PPAs and we have the right
to terminate PPAs by giving written notice to the customer, subject to certain exit costs. As of October 31, 2024, our
generation operating portfolio was 62.8 MW.
Service and warranty agreements
We warranty our products for a specific period of time against manufacturing or performance defects. Our standard U.S.
warranty period is generally 15 months after shipment or 12 months after acceptance of the product. In addition to the
standard product warranty, we have contracted with certain customers to provide services to ensure the power plants meet
minimum operating levels for terms of up to 20 years. Pricing for service contracts is based upon estimates of future costs,
which could be materially different from actual expenses. Refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” for
additional details.
Advanced Technologies contracts
We have contracted with various government agencies and certain companies from private industry to conduct research
and development as either a prime contractor or sub-contractor under multi-year, cost-reimbursement and/or cost-share
type contracts or cooperative agreements. Cost-share terms require that participating contractors share the total cost of the
project based on an agreed upon ratio. In many cases, we are reimbursed only a portion of the costs incurred or to be
incurred under the contract. While government research and development contracts may extend for many years, funding
is often provided incrementally on a year-by-year basis if contract terms are met and Congress authorizes the funds. As of
70
October 31, 2024, Advanced Technologies contract backlog totaled $36.0 million, of which $27.3 million is non-U.S.
Government-funded and $8.7 million is U.S. Government-funded.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations which are not classified as debt. We do not guarantee any third-
party debt. See Note 20. “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
October 31, 2024 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are used in
accounting for, among other things, revenue recognition, lease right-of-use assets and liabilities, loss accruals on service
agreements, excess, slow-moving and obsolete inventories, product warranty accruals, loss accruals on service agreements,
share-based compensation expense, allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization, impairment of
goodwill and in-process research and development intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets (including project
assets), valuation of derivatives, and contingencies. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects
of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are determined to be necessary. Due
to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results in future periods may differ from those estimates.
Our critical accounting policies are those that are both most important to our financial condition and results of operations
and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments on the part of management in their application, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our accounting policies are
set forth below.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business
combination and is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The intangible asset represents indefinite-lived in-process
research and development for cumulative research and development efforts associated with the development of solid oxide
fuel cell stationary power generation and is also reviewed at least annually for impairment.
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other" (“ASC 350”) permits the assessment
of qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances lead to the conclusion that it is necessary to perform
the goodwill impairment test required under ASC 350.
The Company completed its annual impairment analysis of goodwill and in-process research and development assets as
of July 31, 2024. The Company performed a qualitative assessment for fiscal year 2024 and determined that it was more
likely than not that there was no impairment of goodwill or the in-process research and development assets.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (including Project Assets)
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset group which pertains to specific projects may not be recoverable. If events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable, we compare the carrying amount of an asset
group to future undiscounted net cash flows, excluding debt service costs, expected to be generated by the asset group and
its ultimate disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset
group. During the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded certain project asset impairment
charges.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic
606: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, the amount of revenue recognized for any
71
goods or services reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods
and services. To achieve this core principle, the Company applies the following five-step approach: (1) identify the contract
with the customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate
the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when or as a performance
obligation is satisfied.
A contract is accounted for when there has been approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are
identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is
probable. Performance obligations under a contract are identified based on the goods or services that will be transferred to
the customer that are both capable of being distinct and are distinct in the context of the contract. In certain instances, the
Company has concluded distinct goods or services should be accounted for as a single performance obligation that is a
series of distinct goods or services that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. To the extent a contract includes
multiple promised goods or services, the Company must apply judgment to determine whether the customer can benefit
from the goods or services either on their own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer
(the goods or services are capable of being distinct) and if the promise to transfer the goods or services to the customer is
separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (the goods or services are distinct in the context of the contract).
If these criteria are not met, the promised goods or services are accounted for as a single performance obligation. The
transaction price is determined based on the consideration that the Company will be entitled to in exchange for transferring
goods or services to the customer. To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company
estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price, generally utilizing the
expected value method. Determining the transaction price requires judgment. If the contract contains a single performance
obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple
performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative
standalone selling price basis. Standalone selling price is determined by the price at which the performance obligation is
sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the
standalone selling price by taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved
pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations. Performance obligations are satisfied either over time or at a
point in time as discussed in further detail below. In addition, the Company’s contracts with customers generally do not
include significant financing components or non-cash consideration. The Company has elected practical expedients in the
accounting guidance that allow for revenue to be recorded in the amount that the Company has a right to invoice, if that
amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance to date, and that allow the
Company not to disclose related unsatisfied performance obligations. The Company records any amounts that are billed
to customers in excess of revenue recognized as deferred revenue and revenue recognized in excess of amounts billed to
customers as unbilled receivables.
Revenue streams are classified as follows:
Product. Includes the sale of completed project assets, sale and installation of fuel cell power platforms including
site engineering and construction services, and the sale of modules, BOP components and spare parts to customers.
Service. Includes performance under long-term service agreements for power platforms owned by third parties.
Generation. Includes the sale of electricity under PPAs and utility tariffs from project assets retained by the
Company. This also includes revenue received from the sale of other value streams from these assets including the
sale of heat, steam, capacity and renewable energy credits.
Advanced Technologies. Includes revenue from customer-sponsored and government-sponsored Advanced
Technologies projects.
See below for a discussion of revenue recognition under ASC 606 by disaggregated revenue stream.
Completed project assets
Contracts for the sale of completed project assets include the sale of the project asset, the assignment of the service
agreement, and the assignment of the PPA. The relative stand-alone selling price is estimated and is used as the basis for
allocation of the contract consideration. Revenue is recognized upon the satisfaction of the performance obligations, which
72
includes the transfer of control of the project asset to the customer, which is when the contract is signed and the PPA is
assigned to the customer. See below for further discussion regarding revenue recognition for service agreements.
Contractual payments related to the sale of the project asset and assignment of the PPA are generally received up-front.
Payment terms for service agreements are generally ratable over the term of the agreement.
Module Sales
Contracts for module sales represent the sale of a completed fuel cell module at a contracted selling price. These contracts
are on a per unit basis and revenue is recognized as each unit is completed and ready to ship and the performance obligation
is satisfied. Payment terms for module sales are generally based on milestones achieved through the manufacturing
timeline of the module.
Service agreements
Service agreements represent a single performance obligation whereby the Company performs all required maintenance
and monitoring functions, including replacement of modules, to ensure the power platform(s) under the service agreement
generate a minimum power output. To the extent the power platform(s) under service agreements do not achieve the
minimum power output, certain service agreements include a performance guarantee penalty. Performance guarantee
penalties represent variable consideration, which is estimated for each service agreement based on past experience, using
the expected value method. The consideration for each service agreement is recognized over time using costs incurred to
date relative to total estimated costs at completion to measure progress.
The Company reviews its cost estimates on service agreements on an annual basis and records any changes in estimates
on a cumulative catch-up basis.
Loss accruals for service agreements are recognized to the extent that the estimated remaining costs to satisfy the
performance obligation exceed the estimated remaining unrecognized consideration. Estimated losses are recognized in
the period in which losses are identified.
Payment terms for service agreements are generally ratable over the term of the agreement.
Advanced Technologies contracts
Advanced Technologies contracts include the promise to perform research and development services and, as such, this
represents one performance obligation. Revenue from most government sponsored Advanced Technologies projects is
recognized as direct costs are incurred plus allowable overhead less cost share requirements, if any. Revenue is only
recognized to the extent the contracts are funded. Revenue from previous fixed price Advanced Technologies projects is
recognized using the cost-to-cost input method. Revenue recognition for research performed under the EMTEC Joint
Development Agreement (as defined elsewhere herein) also falls into the practical expedient category where revenue is
recorded consistent with the amounts that are to be invoiced.
Payments are based on costs incurred for government sponsored Advanced Technologies projects and upon completion of
milestones for previous fixed-price Advanced Technologies projects. Payments under the EMTEC Joint Development
Agreement are based on time spent and material costs incurred.
Generation revenue
For certain project assets where customers purchase electricity from the Company under PPAs, the Company has
determined that these agreements should be accounted for as operating leases pursuant to ASC 842, Leases. Revenue is
recognized when electricity has been delivered based on the amount of electricity delivered at rates specified under the
contracts. Generation revenue, to the extent the related PPAs are within the scope of ASC 606, include a performance
obligation to provide 100% of the electricity output generated by the associated project asset to the customer. The promise
to provide electricity over the term of the PPA represents a single performance obligation, as it is a promise to transfer a
series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.
Revenue is recognized over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the
Company, and the Company satisfies its performance obligation. Revenue is recognized based on the output method as
73
there is a directly observable output to the customer-electricity delivered to the customer and immediately consumed.
Payments are based on actual power output and the contractual rate for electricity generated.
Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests
The Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction on October 31, 2023 with Franklin Park 2023 FCE Tax Equity
Fund, LLC (“Franklin Park”), a subsidiary of Franklin Park Infrastructure, LLC, for two fuel cell power plant installations
- the 14.0 MW Derby Fuel Cell Project and the 2.8 MW SCEF Fuel Cell Project, both located in Derby, Connecticut
(collectively, the “Derby Projects”).
Under this partnership flip structure, a partnership, in this case Derby Fuel Cell Holdco, LLC (the “Derby Partnership”),
was organized to acquire from FuelCell Energy Finance II, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, all
outstanding equity interests in the Derby Projects. We have determined we are the primary beneficiary in the Derby
Partnership for accounting purposes as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) under U.S. GAAP. We have considered the
provisions within the financing-related agreements (including the limited liability company agreement for the Derby
Partnership) which grant us power to manage and make decisions affecting the operations of the Derby Partnership. We
consider the rights granted to Franklin Park under the agreements to be more protective in nature than participatory.
Therefore, we have determined under the power and benefits criterion of ASC Topic 810, Consolidations (“ASC 810”)
that we are the primary beneficiary of the Derby Partnership. As the primary beneficiary, we consolidate the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the Derby Partnership in our consolidated financial statements, and all
intercompany balances and transactions between us and the Derby Partnership are eliminated. We recognized Franklin
Park’s share of the net assets of the Derby Partnership as nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The income or loss allocations reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Loss may create volatility in our reported results of operations, including potentially changing net loss attributable to
stockholders to net income attributable to stockholders, or vice versa, from quarter to quarter.
In addition, the Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction in August 2021 with East West Bank for the 7.4 MW
fuel cell project located on the U.S. Navy Submarine Base in Groton, CT (the “Groton Project”), which has been structured
as a “partnership flip.” A partnership (the “Groton Partnership”) was organized with East West Bank to acquire from
FuelCell Energy Finance II, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, all of the outstanding equity interests in
Groton Station Fuel Cell, LLC (the “Groton Project Company”). East West Bank has a conditional withdrawal right which
they can exercise and which would require the Company to pay 101% of the amount contributed by East West Bank to
date. In addition, under this partnership flip structure, the Company has an option to acquire all of the equity interests that
East West Bank holds in the Groton Partnership starting approximately five and a half years after the Groton Project is
operational. If the Company exercises this option, the exercise price to be paid by the Company will be the greater of (1)
the fair market value of East West Bank’s equity interest at the time the option is exercised, (2) five percent of the $15
million tax equity commitment and (3) East West Bank’s claim in liquidation determined using the hypothetical liquidation
at book value method.
The Groton Partnership is a VIE under U.S. GAAP. The Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary in the
Groton Partnership for accounting purposes. The Company has considered the provisions within the financing-related
agreements (including the limited liability company agreement for the Groton Partnership) which grant the Company
power to manage and make decisions affecting the operations of the Groton Partnership. The Company considers the rights
granted to East West Bank under the agreements to be more protective in nature than participatory. Therefore, the Company
has determined under the power and benefits criterion of ASC 810 that it is the primary beneficiary of the Groton
Partnership. As the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates in its consolidated financial statements the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the Groton Partnership, and all intercompany balances and transactions
between the Company and the Groton Partnership are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The Company
recognized East West Bank’s share of the net assets of the Groton Partnership, which was $3.0 million as of October 31,
2022, as a redeemable noncontrolling interest in mezzanine equity on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and reclassified the
amount to nonredeemable noncontrolling interest upon commencement of operations of the related project asset in
December 2022. Upon commandment of operations, the Company began to allocate profits and losses to the noncontrolling
interest under the HLBV method.
Finally, the Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction in November 2021 with REI for the 7.4 MW fuel cell
project (the “LIPA Yaphank Project”) in Yaphank Long Island. REI’s tax equity commitment totaled $12.4 million. This
transaction was structured as a “partnership flip,” which is a structure commonly used by tax equity investors in the
74
financing of renewable energy projects. Under this partnership flip structure, a partnership, in this case YTBFC Holdco,
LLC (the “Yaphank Partnership”), was organized to acquire from FuelCell Energy Finance II, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, all outstanding equity interests in Yaphank Fuel Cell Park, LLC, which in turn owns the LIPA
Yaphank Project and is the party to the power purchase agreement and all project agreements. REI holds Class A Units in
the Yaphank Partnership and a subsidiary of the Company holds the Class B Units. Under a partnership flip structure, tax
equity investors agree to receive a minimum target rate of return, typically on an after-tax basis. Prior to receiving a
contractual rate of return or a date specified in the contractual arrangements, REI will receive substantially all of the non-
cash value attributable to the LIPA Yaphank Project, which includes accelerated depreciation and Section 48(a) investment
tax credits; however, the Company will receive a majority of the cash distributions (based on the operating income of the
LIPA Yaphank Project), which are paid quarterly. After REI receives its contractual rate of return, the Company will
receive approximately 95% of the cash and tax allocations.
The Yaphank Partnership is a VIE under U.S. GAAP. The Company has considered the provisions within the financing-
related agreements (including the limited liability company agreement for the Yaphank Partnership) which grant us power
to manage and make decisions affecting the operations of the Yaphank Partnership. We consider the rights granted to REI
under the agreements to be more protective in nature than participatory. Therefore, we have determined under the power
and benefits criterion of ASC 810 that we are the primary beneficiary of the Yaphank Partnership. As the primary
beneficiary, we consolidate the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Yaphank Partnership in our
consolidated financial statements, and all intercompany balances and transactions between us and the Yaphank Partnership
are eliminated. The Company recognized REI’s share of the net assets of the Yaphank Partnership as noncontrolling
interests in its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The income or loss allocations reflected in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Loss may create volatility in our reported results of operations, including potentially
changing net loss attributable to stockholders to net income attributable to stockholders, or vice versa, from quarter to
quarter. The Company allocates profits and losses to REI’s noncontrolling interest under the HLBV method.
See Note 3. “Tax Equity Financings and Investment Tax Credit Sale” for additional information regarding the tax equity
financing transactions with Franklin Park, East West Bank and REI.
Sale-Leaseback Accounting
The Company, through certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, has entered into sale-leaseback transactions for commissioned
project assets where we have entered into a PPA with a customer who is both the site host and end user of the power. Due
to the Company not meeting criteria to account for the transfer of the project assets as a sale since the leases include a
repurchase right, sale accounting is precluded. Accordingly, the Company uses the financing method to account for these
transactions.
Under the financing method of accounting for a sale-leaseback, the Company does not derecognize the project assets and
does not recognize as revenue any of the sale proceeds received from the lessor that contractually constitutes payment to
acquire the assets subject to these arrangements. Instead, the sale proceeds received are accounted for as finance obligations
and leaseback payments made by the Company are allocated between interest expense and a reduction to the finance
obligation. Interest on the finance obligation is calculated using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the inception
of the arrangement on the outstanding finance obligation. While we receive financing for the related project asset, we have
not recognized revenue on the sale-leaseback transactions. Instead, revenue is recognized with respect to the related PPAs
in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies for recognizing generation revenues.
Inventories
Inventories consist principally of raw materials and work-in-process. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out cost
method. Included in our inventory balance are used modules that are brought back into inventory upon installation of new
modules. When a new module is installed, a determination is made as to whether the used module has remaining useful
life or should be scrapped and materials recycled. Modules that are deemed to have remaining useful life are put into
inventory at an estimated value based on the expected remaining life of the module and its projected output. In certain
circumstances, we will make advance payments to vendors for future inventory deliveries. These advance payments are
recorded as Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Inventories are reviewed to determine net realizable
value. This review includes analyzing inventory levels of individual parts considering the current design of our products
and production requirements as well as the expected inventory requirements for maintenance on installed power platforms.
75
Service Expense Recognition
We have entered into service agreements with certain customers to provide monitoring, maintenance and repair services
for fuel cell power platforms. Under the terms of these service agreements, the power platform must meet a minimum
operating output during the term. If the minimum output falls below the contract requirement, we may be subject to
performance penalties or may be required to repair and/or replace the customer’s fuel cell module(s).
The Company records loss accruals for service agreements when the estimated cost of future module exchanges and
maintenance and monitoring activities exceeds the remaining unrecognized contract value. Estimates for future costs on
service agreements are determined by a number of factors, including the estimated remaining life of the module(s), used
replacement modules available, and future operating plans for the power platform. Our estimates are performed on a
contract by contract basis and include cost assumptions based on what we anticipate the service requirements will be to
fulfill obligations for each contract. As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, our loss accruals on service agreements totaled $9.0
million and $9.5 million, respectively.
ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE UPDATE
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
There is no recently adopted accounting guidance applicable to the Company’s financial statements.
Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Effective
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to improve reportable segment
disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. In addition, the
guidance enhances interim disclosure requirements, clarifies circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple
segment measures of profit or loss, provides new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable
segment and contains other disclosure requirements. The purpose of the guidance is to enable investors to better understand
an entity’s overall performance and assess potential future cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is
permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued guidance to enhance income tax disclosures by providing information to better assess
how an entity’s operations, related tax risks, tax planning and operational opportunities affect its tax rate and prospects for
future cash flows. Additional disclosures will be required to the annual effective tax rate reconciliation including specific
categories and further disaggregated reconciling items that meet the quantitative threshold. Additionally, disclosures will
be required relating to income tax expense and payments made to federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2024. We are currently evaluating
the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued new guidance which requires enhanced disclosure of specified categories of expenses
included in certain expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. This guidance will be effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company
is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine its adoption approach and the impact on the presentation and
disclosures of its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company anticipates its processes
will be enhanced to address the disaggregation and disclosure requirements, though it does not expect adoption to impact
its overall results from operations.
76
Item 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Exposure Risk
We have invested in U.S. Treasury Securities with maturities of less than three months. We expect to hold these
investments until maturity and accordingly, these investments are carried at amortized cost and not subject to mark-to-
market accounting. As of October 31, 2024, our U.S. Treasury Securities had a carrying value of $109.1 million, which
approximated fair value. These U.S. Treasury Securities matured between November 5, 2024 and November 29, 2024,
and had a weighted average yield to maturity of 4.78% as of October 31, 2024.
Cash is invested overnight with high credit quality financial institutions and therefore we are not exposed to market risk
on our cash holdings from changing interest rates. Based on our overall interest rate exposure as of October 31, 2024,
including all interest rate sensitive instruments, a change in interest rates of 1% would not have a material impact on our
results of operations.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
As of October 31, 2024, approximately 1% of our total cash and cash equivalents were in currencies other than U.S. dollars
(primarily the Euro, Canadian dollars and Korean Won) and we have no plans of repatriation. We make purchases from
certain vendors and receive payment from certain customers in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Although we have not
experienced significant foreign exchange rate losses to date, we may in the future, especially to the extent that we do not
engage in currency hedging activities. The economic impact of currency exchange rate movements on our operating results
is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental
actions and other factors. These changes, if material, may cause us to adjust our financing and operating strategies.
Derivative Fair Value Exposure Risk
Interest Rate Swap
On May 16, 2019, an interest rate swap agreement was entered into with Fifth Third Bank in connection with the May
2019 Credit Agreement with Liberty Bank, as administrative agent and co-lead arranger, and Fifth Third Bank as co-lead
arranger and interest rate swap hedger (the “BFC Credit Agreement”) for the term of the loan. The net interest rate across
the BFC Credit Agreement and the swap transaction resulted in a fixed rate of 5.09%. The interest rate swap was adjusted
to fair value on a quarterly basis. The estimated fair value was based on Level 2 inputs including primarily the forward
LIBOR curve available to swap dealers. The valuation methodology involved comparison of (i) the sum of the present
value of all monthly variable rate payments based on a reset rate using the forward LIBOR curve and (ii) the sum of the
present value of all monthly fixed rate payments on the notional amount, which was equivalent to the outstanding principal
amount of the loan. On August 1, 2022, the Company entered into an amendment to its interest rate swap agreement that
replaced LIBOR with Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) effective as of June 2023. The fair value
adjustment for the year ended October 31, 2023 resulted in a $0.1 million loss. This interest rate swap agreement was
terminated during fiscal year 2023 in connection with the payoff of the senior and subordinated indebtedness of the
Company to Liberty Bank, Fifth Third Bank and Connecticut Green Bank related to the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project.
On May 19, 2023, in connection with the closing of the OpCo Financing Facility, the Company entered into an ISDA 2002
Master Agreement and an ISDA Schedule to the 2002 Master Agreement with Investec Bank plc as a hedge provider, and
an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement and an ISDA Schedule to the 2002 Master Agreement with Bank of Montreal (Chicago
Branch) as a hedge provider. On May 22, 2023, OpCo Borrower executed the related trade confirmations for these interest
rate swap agreements with these hedge providers to protect against adverse price movements in the floating SOFR rate
associated with 100% of the aggregate principal balance of the Term Loan outstanding. Pursuant to the terms of such
agreements, OpCo Borrower will pay a fixed rate of interest of 3.716%. The net interest rate across the Financing
Agreement and the swap transaction is 6.366% in the first four years and 6.866% thereafter. The obligations of OpCo
Borrower to the hedge providers under the interest rate swap agreements are treated as obligations under the Financing
Agreement and, accordingly, are secured, on a pari passu basis, by the same collateral securing the obligations of OpCo
Borrower under the Financing Agreement. The Company has not elected hedge accounting treatment and, as a result, the
derivative will be remeasured to fair value quarterly with the resulting gains/losses recorded to other income/expense. The
fair value adjustments for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 resulted in a loss of $3.1 million and a gain of $3.3
million, respectively.
77
Project Fuel Price Exposure Risk
Certain of our PPAs for project assets in our generation operating portfolio and, at times, project assets under construction
expose us to fluctuating fuel price risks as well as the risk of being unable to procure the required amounts of fuel and the
lack of alternative available fuel sources. We seek to mitigate our fuel risk using strategies including: (i) fuel cost
reimbursement mechanisms in our PPAs to allow for pass through of fuel costs (full or partial) where possible, which we
have done with our 14.9 MW operating project in Bridgeport, CT; (ii) procuring fuel under fixed price physical supply
contracts with investment grade counterparties, which we have done for twenty years for our Tulare BioMAT project, the
initial seven years of the twenty year PPA for our LIPA Yaphank Project (through September of 2028), six years of the
twenty year PPA for our 14.0 MW and 2.8 MW Derby Projects (through October of 2029), and the initial two years of the
twenty year hydrogen power purchase agreement for our Toyota project (through May of 2025); and (iii) potentially
entering into future financial hedges with investment grade counterparties to offset potential negative market fluctuations.
The Company does not take a fundamental view on natural gas or other commodity pricing and seeks commercially
available means to reduce commodity exposure. If the Company is unable to secure fuel on favorable economic terms, it
may result in impairment charges.
We currently have four projects with fuel sourcing risk for which there is no pass-through mechanism. The Toyota project
requires procurement of RNG, and our Derby, CT 14.0 MW project, our Derby, CT 2.8 MW project, and our 7.4 MW
project in Yaphank Long Island (the “Yaphank Project”) require natural gas. A two-year (through May of 2025) fuel
supply contract has been executed for the Toyota project. Six-year (through October 2029) fuel supply contracts have been
executed for the 14.0 MW and 2.8 MW Derby Projects. We are currently in the midst of a seven-year fuel supply contract
(through September 2028) for our 7.4 MW Yaphank Project. The Company will look to extend the duration of these
contracts should market and credit conditions allow. If the Company is unable to secure fuel on favorable economic terms,
it may result in impairment charges to the Derby Project assets or the Yaphank Project assets and further charges for the
Toyota project asset.
Historically, this risk has not been material to our financial statements as our operating projects prior to October 31, 2024
either did not have fuel price risk exposure, had fuel cost reimbursement mechanisms in our related PPAs to allow for pass
through of fuel costs (full or partial), or had established long term fixed price fuel physical contracts. To provide a
meaningful assessment of the fuel price risk arising from price movements of natural gas, the Company performed a
sensitivity analysis to determine the impact a change in natural gas commodity pricing would have on our Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (assuming that all projects with fuel price risk were operating). A
$1/Metric Million British Thermal Unit (“MMBTu”) increase in market pricing compared to our underlying project models
would result in a cost impact of approximately $26,000 to our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Loss on an annual basis. We have also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the impact of RNG pricing and a $10/MMBTu
increase in market pricing compared to our underlying project models would result in an impact of approximately $2.0
million to our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss on an annual basis.
The Company net settled certain natural gas purchases under previous normal purchase normal sale contract designations
during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023 for one contract and during the second quarter of fiscal year 2024 for other
contracts, and recorded a mark-to-market derivative net loss during the year ended October 31, 2024 of $6.9 million, and
a mark-to-market derivative gain during the year ended October 31, 2023 of $4.1 million, as a result of the change to mark-
to-market accounting.
78
Item 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 185)
79
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2024 and 2023
82
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended October 31, 2024, 2023
and 2022
83
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
86
79
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
FuelCell Energy, Inc.:
Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FuelCell Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of October 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively,
the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of October 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of October 31, 2024 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained
in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial
statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
80
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded
as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts
or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging,
subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on
the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below,
providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Estimated costs at completion for certain service arrangements
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s service agreements represent a single
performance obligation whereby the Company performs all required maintenance and monitoring functions,
including replacement of modules, to ensure the power platforms under the service agreement generate a minimum
power output. The consideration for each service agreement is recognized over time using costs incurred relative to
the total estimated costs at completion to measure progress. The Company had service revenue of $10.0 million for
the year ended October 31, 2024.
We identified the evaluation of total estimated costs at completion for certain service agreements as a critical audit
matter. Specifically, evaluating the Company’s total estimated costs at completion required complex auditor
judgement to assess the estimated number of fuel cell modules to be replaced during the term of the agreements and
their associated costs. These areas involved the application of significant estimation by management and contained
significant measurement uncertainty.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design
and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s process to develop total
estimated costs at completion for service agreements. This included a control related to the estimated number of fuel
cell modules to be replaced during the term of the agreement and their associated costs. For certain service agreements,
we evaluated the estimated number of fuel cell modules to be replaced and their associated costs by:
x
comparing the estimated number of fuel cell modules to be replace to the replacement plan developed and
maintained by the Company’s service department
x
comparing the total estimated costs to manufacture fuel cell modules to historical actual costs
x
comparing current period total estimated costs at completion to previous total estimated costs at completion and
assessing the cause of certain revisions
81
x
assessing the number of fuel cell module replacements that are expected to occur during the contract term using
the useful life of fuel cell modules
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1995.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 27, 2024
82
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
October 31, 2024 and 2023
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
October 31,
October 31,
2024
2023
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, unrestricted
$
148,133
$
249,952
Restricted cash and cash equivalents - short-term
12,161
5,159
Investments - short-term
109,123
103,760
Accounts receivable, net
11,751
3,809
Unbilled receivables
36,851
16,296
Inventories
113,703
84,456
Other current assets
12,736
12,881
Total current assets
444,458
476,313
Restricted cash and cash equivalents - long-term
48,589
44,465
Inventories - long-term
2,743
7,329
Project assets, net
242,131
258,066
Property, plant and equipment, net
130,686
89,668
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net
8,122
8,352
Goodwill
4,075
4,075
Intangible assets, net
14,779
16,076
Other assets
48,541
51,176
Total assets (1)
$
944,124
$
955,520
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt
$
15,924
$
10,067
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
807
599
Accounts payable
22,585
26,518
Accrued liabilities
30,362
26,313
Deferred revenue
4,226
2,406
Total current liabilities
73,904
65,903
Long-term deferred revenue
3,010
732
Long-term operating lease liabilities
8,894
8,992
Long-term debt and other liabilities
130,850
119,588
Total liabilities (1)
216,658
195,215
Redeemable Series B preferred stock (liquidation preference of $64,020 as of
October 31, 2024 and October 31, 2023)
59,857
59,857
Total equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock ($0.0001 par value); 1,000,000,000 shares authorized as of October 31, 2024 and
October 31, 2023; 20,375,932 and 15,020,872 shares issued and outstanding as of October 31,
2024 and October 31, 2023, respectively
2
2
Additional paid-in capital
2,300,031
2,199,704
Accumulated deficit
(1,641,550)
(1,515,541)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1,561)
(1,672)
Treasury stock, Common, at cost (12,543 and 8,216 shares as of October 31, 2024
and October 31, 2023, respectively)
(1,198)
(1,078)
Deferred compensation
1,198
1,078
Total stockholders’ equity
656,922
682,493
Noncontrolling interests
10,687
17,955
Total equity
667,609
700,448
Total liabilities, redeemable Series B preferred stock and total equity
$
944,124
$
955,520
(1)
As of October 31, 2024 and October 31, 2023, the combined assets of the variable interest entities (“VIEs”) were $311,723 and $235,290, respectively, that can
only be used to settle obligations of the VIEs. These assets include cash of $2,891, accounts receivable of $674, unbilled accounts receivable of $9,479, operating
lease right of use assets of $1,663, other current assets of $135,756, restricted cash and cash equivalents of $639, project assets of $157,604 and other assets of
$3,018 as of October 31, 2024, and cash of $4,797, restricted cash and cash equivalents of $526, unbilled accounts receivable of $1,876, other current assets of
$50,713, operating lease right of use assets of $1,680, derivative asset of $4,127, other assets of $1,125 and project assets of $170,444 as of October 31, 2023.
The combined liabilities of the VIEs as of October 31, 2024 include short-term operating lease liabilities of $204, accounts payable of $181,274, accrued liabilities
of $341, deferred revenue of $20, derivative liabilities of $3,693, long-term operating lease liability of $2,142 and other non-current liabilities of $240 and, as of
October 31, 2023, include short-term operating lease liabilities of $203, accounts payable of $165,824, long-term operating lease liability of $2,159 and other
non-current liabilities of $187.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
83
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
For the Years Ended October 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
2024
2023
2022
Revenues:
Product
$
25,675
$
19,589 $
60,000
Service
9,969
49,084
12,786
Generation
49,975
37,508
36,186
Advanced Technologies
26,513
17,213
21,512
Total revenues
112,132
123,394
130,484
Costs of revenues:
Product
39,582
12,878
64,495
Service
11,098
44,953
17,233
Generation
79,861
62,913
63,147
Advanced Technologies
17,509
13,185
15,184
Total costs of revenues
148,050
133,929
160,059
Gross loss
(35,918)
(10,535)
(29,575)
Operating expenses:
Administrative and selling expenses
64,604
64,528
79,620
Research and development expenses
55,404
61,021
34,529
Restructuring expense
2,562
—
—
Total costs and expenses
122,570
125,549
114,149
Loss from operations
(158,488)
(136,084)
(143,724)
Interest expense
(9,690)
(7,247)
(6,394)
Interest income
13,720
15,795
3,386
Gain on extinguishment of finance obligations and debt, net
-
15,337
—
Other (expense) income, net
(2,295)
4,724
319
Loss before provision for income taxes
(156,753)
(107,475)
(146,413)
Provision for income taxes
(25)
(581)
(819)
Net loss
(156,778)
(108,056)
(147,232)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(30,769)
(488)
(4,510)
Net loss attributable to FuelCell Energy, Inc.
(126,009)
(107,568)
(142,722)
Series B preferred stock dividends
(3,200)
(3,200)
(3,200)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$ (129,209)
$ (110,768) $ (145,922)
Loss per share basic and diluted:
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
$
(7.83)
$
(7.92) $
(11.43)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
16,505,257
13,991,593
12,771,305
2024
2023
2022
Net loss
$ (156,778)
$ (108,056)
$ (147,232)
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
111
80
(933)
Total comprehensive loss
$ (156,667) $ (107,976) $ (148,165)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(30,769)
(488)
(4,510)
Comprehensive loss attributable to FuelCell Energy, Inc.
$
(125,898) $ (107,488) $
(143,655)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
84
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the Years Ended October 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Treasury
Stock
Deferred
Compensation
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balance, October 31, 2021
12,220,600 $
1 $ 1,908,507 $ (1,265,251) $
(819) $
(586) $
586 $
642,438 $
— $
642,438
Sale of common stock, net of
fees
1,279,897
—
183,552
—
—
—
—
183,552
—
183,552
Common stock issued, non-
employee compensation
2,562
—
305
—
—
—
—
305
—
305
Stock issued under benefit
plans, net of taxes paid upon
vesting of restricted stock
awards
17,998
—
(1,840)
—
—
—
—
(1,840)
—
(1,840)
Share based compensation
—
—
6,792
—
—
—
—
6,792
—
6,792
Preferred dividends — Series
B
—
—
(3,200)
—
—
—
—
(3,200)
—
(3,200)
Effect of foreign currency
translation
—
—
—
—
(933)
—
—
(933)
—
(933)
Adjustment for deferred
compensation
(2,314)
—
—
—
—
(269)
269
—
—
—
Reclassification of redeemable
non-controlling interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
12,419
12,419
Return of capital to
noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(496)
(496)
Distribution to noncontrolling
interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(308)
(308)
Net Loss
—
—
—
(142,722)
—
—
—
(142,722)
(4,510)
(147,232)
Balance, October 31, 2022
13,518,743 $
1 $ 2,094,116 $ (1,407,973) $
(1,752) $
(855) $
855 $
684,392 $
7,105 $
691,497
Sale of common stock, net of
fees
1,477,361
1
97,438
—
—
—
—
97,439
—
97,439
Common stock issued, non-
employee compensation
3,454
—
225
—
—
—
—
225
—
225
Stock issued under benefit
plans, net of taxes paid upon
vesting of restricted stock
awards
24,768
(829)
—
—
—
—
(829)
—
(829)
Share based compensation
—
—
11,954
—
—
—
—
11,954
—
11,954
Preferred dividends — Series
B
—
—
(3,200)
—
—
—
—
(3,200)
—
(3,200)
Effect of foreign currency
translation
—
—
—
—
80
—
—
80
—
80
Adjustment for deferred
compensation
(3,454)
—
—
—
—
(223)
223
—
—
—
Contributions received for the
sale of noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9,052
9,052
Reclassification of
noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,030
3,030
Distribution to noncontrolling
interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(744)
(744)
Net loss
—
—
(107,568)
—
—
—
(107,568)
(488)
(108,056)
Balance, October 31, 2023
15,020,872 $
2 $ 2,199,704 $ (1,515,541) $
(1,672) $
(1,078) $
1,078 $
682,493 $
17,955 $
700,448
Sale of common stock, net of
fees
5,302,378
—
92,555
—
—
—
—
92,555
—
92,555
Common stock issued, non-
employee compensation
6,651
—
159
—
—
—
—
159
—
159
Stock issued under benefit
plans, net of taxes paid upon
vesting of restricted stock
awards
50,358
(951)
—
—
—
—
(951)
—
(951)
Share based compensation
—
—
11,764
—
—
—
—
11,764
—
11,764
Preferred dividends — Series
B
—
—
(3,200)
—
—
—
—
(3,200)
—
(3,200)
Effect of foreign currency
translation
—
—
—
—
111
—
—
111
—
111
Adjustment for deferred
compensation
(4,327)
—
—
—
—
(120)
120
—
—
—
Contributions received for the
sale of noncontrolling interest
25,122
25,122
Distribution to noncontrolling
interest
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,621)
(1,621)
Net loss
—
—
(126,009)
—
—
—
(126,009)
(30,769)
(156,778)
Balance, October 31, 2024
20,375,932 $
2 $ 2,300,031 $ (1,641,550) $
(1,561) $
(1,198) $
1,198 $
656,922 $
10,687 $
667,609
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
85
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
(Amounts in thousands)
Year Ended October 31,
2024
2023
2022
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss
$
(156,778)
$
(108,056) $
(147,232)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Share-based compensation
11,764
11,954
6,792
Depreciation and amortization
36,193
25,375
21,274
Gain on extinguishment of finance obligations and debt, net
-
(15,337)
Non-cash interest expense on finance obligations
2,182
3,228
4,210
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative contracts
9,940
(7,441)
(779)
Operating lease costs
1,404
1,486
1,521
Operating lease payments
(1,266)
(1,226)
(1,438)
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and project assets
1,264
2,375
1,782
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses
-
(57)
583
Other, net
237
456
2,632
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Accounts receivable
(7,942)
1,076
9,199
Unbilled receivables
(23,043)
(21,921)
(231)
Inventories
(29,247)
4,686
(28,058)
Other assets
(5,404)
(13,090)
(2,092)
(Decrease) increase in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable
(999)
3,001
6,332
Accrued liabilities
4,691
(4,461)
24,616
Deferred revenue
4,098
(22,298)
(11,278)
Net cash used in operating activities
(152,906)
(140,250)
(112,167)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(47,721)
(39,355)
(21,078)
Project asset expenditures
(11,832)
(53,007)
(25,573)
Maturity of held-to-maturity debt securities
835,240
199,090
—
Purchases of held-to-maturity debt securities
(835,736)
(299,093)
—
Net cash used in investing activities
(60,049)
(192,365)
(46,651)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of debt and finance obligations
(11,699)
(47,830)
(9,544)
Proceeds from the issuance of debt
23,104
100,500
—
Payment for deferred financing costs
(1,159)
(3,469)
—
Common stock issued for stock plans and related expenses
120
56
47
Contributions received from sale of noncontrolling interest, net of return of capital
25,122
9,052
11,923
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
(1,621)
(596)
(308)
Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards
(1,071)
(885)
(1,887)
Common stock issuance, net of fees
92,555
97,439
183,552
Payment of preferred dividends
(3,200)
(3,200)
(3,200)
Net cash provided by financing activities
122,151
151,067
180,583
Effects on cash from changes in foreign currency rates
111
80
(933)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
(90,693)
(181,468)
20,832
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash-beginning of period
299,576
481,044
460,212
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash-end of period
$
208,883
$
299,576
$
481,044
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash and cash equivalents, unrestricted
$
148,133
$
249,952
$
458,055
Restricted cash and cash equivalents - short-term
12,161
5,159
4,423
Restricted cash and cash equivalents - long-term
48,589
44,465
18,566
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
208,883
$
299,576
$
481,044
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
86
Note 1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation
Headquartered in Danbury, Connecticut, FuelCell Energy, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company” “FuelCell
Energy,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a global leader in delivering environmentally responsible distributed baseload energy
platform solutions through our proprietary fuel cell technology. Today, we offer commercial technology that produces
clean electricity, heat, clean hydrogen, and water and is also capable of recovering and capturing carbon for utilization
and/or sequestration, depending on product configuration and application. We also continue to invest in product
development and commercializing technologies that are expected to add new capabilities to our platforms’ abilities to
deliver hydrogen and long duration hydrogen-based energy storage through our solid oxide technologies, as well as further
enhance our existing platforms’ carbon capture solutions.
FuelCell Energy is focused on advancing sustainable clean energy technologies that address some of the world’s most
critical challenges around energy access, security, resilience, reliability, affordability, safety and environmental
stewardship. As a leading global manufacturer of proprietary fuel cell technology platforms, FuelCell Energy is uniquely
positioned to serve customers worldwide with sustainable products and solutions for industrial and commercial businesses,
utilities, governments, municipalities, and communities.
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts, those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and those of our
consolidated variable interest entities. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
At 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 8, 2024, we effected a 1-for-30 reverse stock split, reducing the number of our
common shares outstanding on that date from 611,278,662 shares to approximately 20,375,932 shares. The number of
authorized shares of common stock remains unchanged at 1,000,000,000 shares and the number of authorized shares of
preferred stock remains unchanged at 250,000 shares. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon settlement of
outstanding restricted stock unit, performance stock unit and deferred stock unit awards were reduced proportionately in
connection with the reverse stock split. Additionally, the conversion rate of our Series B Preferred Stock (as defined
elsewhere herein), the exercise price of all outstanding options, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of all outstanding options, and the number of shares reserved for future issuance pursuant to our equity
compensation plans and employee stock purchase plan were all adjusted proportionately in connection with the reverse
stock split. All share and per share amounts, exercise prices, conversion rates and conversion prices presented herein have
been adjusted retroactively to reflect these changes.
Liquidity
Our principal sources of cash have been proceeds from the sale of our products and projects, electricity generation
revenues, research and development and service agreements with third parties, sales of our common stock through public
equity offerings, and proceeds from debt, project financing and tax monetization transactions. We have utilized this cash
to accelerate the commercialization of our solid oxide platforms, develop new capabilities to separate and capture carbon,
develop and construct project assets, invest in capital improvements and expansion of our operations, perform research
and development, pay down existing outstanding indebtedness, and meet our other cash and liquidity needs.
As of October 31, 2024, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $148.1 million compared to $250.0 million as of
October 31, 2023. During the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company invested in United States (U.S.)
Treasury Securities. The amortized cost of the U.S. Treasury Securities outstanding totaled $109.1 million as of October
31, 2024 compared to $103.8 million as of October 31, 2023 and is classified as Investments - short-term on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The outstanding U.S. Treasury Securities as of October 31, 2024 matured between
November 5, 2024 and November 29, 2024.
On October 31, 2024, the Company closed on a project debt financing transaction with the Export-Import Bank of the
United States (“EXIM”) to support the Company’s obligations under its long-term service agreement with Gyeonggi Green
Energy Co., Ltd. (“GGE”), pursuant to which the Company is to supply forty-two 1.4-megawatt upgraded carbonate fuel
cell modules to replace existing units at GGE’s Hwaseong Baran Industrial Complex. In conjunction with this financing,
the Company entered into a promissory note and related security agreements securing the loan with equipment liens,
resulting in net proceeds of approximately $9.2 million. See Note 12. “Debt” for additional information regarding the
transaction with EXIM.
87
On April 25, 2024, the Company (through one of its indirect subsidiaries) entered into three related term loan facilities
(which are referred to herein as the “Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility” and the “Derby Subordinated Back
Leverage Loan Facility”), resulting in net proceeds of $12.8 million. See Note 12. “Debt” for additional information
regarding the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility.
On April 10, 2024, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Open Market Sale Agreement,
dated July 12, 2022 (the “2022 Sales Agreement”), with Jefferies LLC, B. Riley Securities, Inc., Barclays Capital Inc.,
BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Canaccord Genuity LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC and Loop Capital Markets LLC (each, an “Agent” and together, the “Agents”) (the 2022 Sales Agreement
as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended Sales Agreement”), with respect to an at the market offering program
under which the Company may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering
price of up to $300.0 million (exclusive of any amounts previously sold under the 2022 Sales Agreement prior to its
amendment). Between April 10, 2024 (the date of the Amended Sales Agreement) and October 31, 2024, approximately
5.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock were sold under the Amended Sales Agreement resulting in gross
proceeds of approximately $95.1 million. On December 27, 2024, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the
Amended Sales Agreement, which removes certain representations and warranties relating to the Company’s status as a
well-known seasoned issuer. See Note 13. “Stockholders’ Equity and Warrant Liabilities” for additional information
regarding the 2022 Sales Agreement and the Amended Sales Agreement.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Company completed its technical improvement plan to bring the Groton
Project (defined elsewhere herein) to its rated capacity and the Groton Project reached its design rated output of 7.4 MW.
The Company achieved all conditions precedent required for the first annual funding from East West Bancorp, Inc. (“East
West Bank”) under the tax equity financing transaction between the Company and East West Bank and, as a result, the
Company received a $4.0 million contribution during the year ended October 31, 2024 which is recorded as noncontrolling
interest on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2023, the Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction with Franklin Park
2023 FCE Tax Equity Fund, LLC (“Franklin Park”), a subsidiary of Franklin Park Infrastructure, LLC, for two fuel cell
power plant installations -- the 14.0 megawatt (“MW”) Derby Fuel Cell Project and the 2.8 MW SCEF Fuel Cell Project,
both located in Derby, Connecticut (collectively, the “Derby Projects”). Franklin Park’s tax equity commitment with
respect to the Derby Projects totaled $30.2 million. Of this amount, approximately $9.1 million was received on October
31, 2023 and the remaining approximately $21.1 million was received during the year ended October 31, 2024. In
connection with the initial closing of this tax equity financing transaction in fiscal year 2023, the Company paid closing
costs of approximately $1.8 million, which included appraisal fees, title insurance expenses and legal and consulting fees.
We believe that our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, expected receipts from our contracted backlog, funds received
upon the maturity of U.S. Treasury Securities, and release of short-term restricted cash less expected disbursements over
the next twelve months will be sufficient to allow the Company to meet its obligations for at least one year from the date
of issuance of these financial statements.
To date, we have not achieved profitable operations or sustained positive cash flow from operations. The Company’s
future liquidity, for fiscal year 2025 and in the long-term, will depend on its ability to (i) timely complete current projects
in process within budget, (ii) increase cash flows from its generation operating portfolio, including by meeting conditions
required to timely commence operation of new projects, operating its generation operating portfolio in compliance with
minimum performance guarantees and operating its generation operating portfolio in accordance with revenue
expectations, (iii) obtain financing for project construction and manufacturing expansion, (iv) obtain permanent financing
for its projects once constructed, (v) increase order and contract volumes, which would lead to additional product sales,
service agreements and generation revenues, (vi) obtain funding for and receive payment for research and development
under current and future Advanced Technologies contracts, (vii) successfully commercialize its solid oxide, hydrogen and
carbon capture platforms, (viii) implement capacity expansion for solid oxide product manufacturing, (ix) implement the
product cost reductions necessary to achieve profitable operations, (x) manage working capital and the Company’s
unrestricted cash balance and (xi) access the capital markets to raise funds through the sale of debt and equity securities,
convertible notes, and other equity-linked instruments.
We are continually assessing different means by which to accelerate the Company’s growth, enter new markets,
commercialize new products, and enable capacity expansion. Therefore, from time to time, the Company may consider
88
and enter into agreements for one or more of the following: negotiated financial transactions, minority investments,
collaborative ventures, technology sharing, transfer or other technology license arrangements, joint ventures, partnerships,
acquisitions or other business transactions for the purpose(s) of geographic or manufacturing expansion and/or new product
or technology development and commercialization, including hydrogen production through our carbonate and solid oxide
platforms and storage and carbon capture, sequestration and utilization technologies.
Our business model requires substantial outside financing arrangements and satisfaction of the conditions of such
arrangements to construct and deploy our projects to facilitate the growth of our business. The Company has invested
capital raised from sales of its common stock to build out its project portfolio. The Company has also utilized and expects
to continue to utilize a combination of long-term debt and tax equity financing (e.g., sale-leaseback transactions,
partnership flip transactions and the monetization and/or transfer of eligible investment and production tax credits) to
finance its project asset portfolio as these projects commence commercial operations, particularly in light of the passage
of the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022. The Company may also seek to undertake private placements of debt
securities to finance its project asset portfolio. The proceeds of any such financing, if obtained, may allow the Company
to reinvest capital back into the business and to fund other projects. We also expect to seek additional financing in both
the debt and equity markets in the future. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms if and when needed, or on
terms acceptable to us or our lenders, if we do not satisfy the conditions of our financing arrangements, if we spend more
than the financing approved for projects, if project costs exceed an amount that the Company can finance, or if we do not
generate sufficient revenues or obtain capital sufficient for our corporate needs, we may be required to further reduce or
slow planned spending, further reduce staffing, sell assets, seek alternative financing and take other measures, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All cash equivalents consist of investments in money market funds with original maturities of three months or less at the
date of acquisition. We place our temporary cash equivalent investments with high credit quality financial institutions.
Inventories and Advance Payments to Vendors
Inventories consist principally of raw materials and work-in-process. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out cost
method. Included in our inventory balance are used modules that are brought back into inventory upon installation of new
modules. When a new module is installed, a determination is made as to whether the used module has remaining useful
life or should be scrapped and materials recycled. Modules that are deemed to have remaining useful life are put into
inventory at an estimated value based on the expected remaining life of the module and its projected output. In certain
circumstances, we will make advance payments to vendors for future inventory deliveries. These advance payments are
recorded as Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventories are reviewed to determine net realizable value. This review includes analyzing inventory levels of individual
parts considering the current design of our products and production requirements as well as the expected inventory
requirements for maintenance on installed power platforms.
Investments – Short-Term
The Company invests in U.S. Treasury Securities which are held-to-maturity and are recorded at amortized cost.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit Losses
The Company had no allowance for doubtful accounts or credit losses as of October 31, 2024 and 2023. Uncollectible
accounts receivable are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when all collection efforts have failed and it
is deemed unlikely that the amount will be recovered. The Company would record a specific reserve for individual accounts
when the Company becomes aware of specific customer circumstances such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or the
deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position.
89
Project Assets
Project assets consist of capitalized costs for fuel cell projects in various stages of development, including those projects
with respect to which we have entered into power purchase agreements (“PPAs”) and those projects with respect to which
we expect to secure long-term contracts. Such development costs are generally incurred prior to entering into a definitive
sales or long-term financing agreement for the project. Project assets also include capitalized costs for fuel cell projects
which are the subject of sale-leaseback transactions with Crestmark Equipment Finance, a division of MetaBank
(“Crestmark”). Project asset costs include costs for developing and constructing a complete turn-key fuel cell project.
Development costs can include legal, consulting, permitting, interconnect, and other similar costs. To the extent we enter
into a definitive sales agreement, we expense project assets to cost of sales after the respective project asset is sold to a
customer and all revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation which is recorded based on the straight-
line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-
line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the term of the lease. When property, plant or
equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations for the period.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business
combination and is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The intangible asset represents indefinite-lived in-process
research and development (“IPR&D”) for cumulative research and development efforts associated with the development
of solid oxide fuel cell stationary power generation and is also reviewed at least annually for impairment.
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”) permits the
assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances lead to the conclusion that it is necessary
to perform the goodwill impairment test required under ASC 350.
The Company completed its annual impairment analysis of goodwill and IPR&D as of July 31, 2024. The goodwill and
IPR&D asset are both held by the Company’s Versa Power Systems, Inc. (“Versa Inc.”) reporting unit. Goodwill and the
IPR&D asset are also reviewed for possible impairment whenever changes in conditions indicate that the fair value of a
reporting unit or IPR&D asset is more likely than not below its respective carrying value. No impairment charges were
recorded with respect to goodwill or the IPR&D asset during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (including Project Assets)
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of the asset group may not be recoverable, we compare the carrying amount of the asset group to the future undiscounted
net cash flows, excluding debt service costs, expected to be generated by the asset group and its ultimate disposition. If
the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, the impairment to be recognized is measured by
the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC
606”). Under ASC 606, the amount of revenue recognized for any goods or services reflects the consideration that the
Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods and services. To achieve this core principle, the
Company applies the following five-step approach: (1) identify the contract with the customer; (2) identify the
performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to
performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when or as a performance obligation is satisfied.
A contract is accounted for when there has been approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are
identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is
90
probable. Performance obligations under a contract are identified based on the goods or services that will be transferred to
the customer that are both capable of being distinct and are distinct in the context of the contract. In certain instances, the
Company has concluded distinct goods or services should be accounted for as a single performance obligation that is a
series of distinct goods or services that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. To the extent a contract includes
multiple promised goods or services, the Company must apply judgment to determine whether the customer can benefit
from the goods or services either on their own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer
(the goods or services are capable of being distinct) and if the promise to transfer the goods or services to the customer is
separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (the goods or services are distinct in the context of the contract).
If these criteria are not met, the promised goods or services are accounted for as a single performance obligation. The
transaction price is determined based on the consideration that the Company will be entitled to in exchange for transferring
goods or services to the customer. To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company
estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price, generally utilizing the
expected value method. Determining the transaction price requires judgment. If the contract contains a single performance
obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple
performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative
standalone selling price basis. Standalone selling price is determined by the price at which the performance obligation is
sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the
standalone selling price by taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved
pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations. Performance obligations are satisfied either over time or at a
point in time as discussed in further detail below. In addition, the Company’s contracts with customers generally do not
include significant financing components or non-cash consideration. The Company has elected practical expedients in the
accounting guidance that allow for revenue to be recorded in the amount that the Company has a right to invoice, if that
amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance to date, and that allow the
Company not to disclose related unsatisfied performance obligations. The Company records any amounts that are billed
to customers in excess of revenue recognized as deferred revenue and revenue recognized in excess of amounts billed to
customers as unbilled receivables.
Revenue streams are classified as follows:
Product. Includes the sale of completed project assets, sale and installation of fuel cell power platforms including
site engineering and construction services, and the sale of modules, balance of plant (“BOP”) components and spare
parts to customers.
Service. Includes performance under long-term service agreements for power platforms owned by third parties.
Generation. Includes the sale of electricity under PPAs and utility tariffs from project assets retained by the
Company. This also includes revenue received from the sale of other value streams from these assets including the
sale of heat, steam, capacity and renewable energy credits.
Advanced Technologies. Includes revenue from customer-sponsored and government-sponsored Advanced
Technologies projects.
See below for a discussion of revenue recognition under ASC 606 by disaggregated revenue stream.
Completed project assets
Contracts for the sale of completed project assets include the sale of the project asset, the assignment of the service
agreement, and the assignment of the PPA. The relative stand-alone selling price is estimated and is used as the basis for
allocation of the contract consideration. Revenue is recognized upon the satisfaction of the performance obligations, which
includes the transfer of control of the project asset to the customer, which is when the contract is signed and the PPA is
assigned to the customer. See below for further discussion regarding revenue recognition for service agreements.
Contractual payments related to the sale of the project asset and assignment of the PPA are generally received up-front.
Payment terms for service agreements are generally ratable over the term of the agreement.
91
Module sales
Contracts for module sales represent the sale of a completed fuel cell module at a contracted selling price. These contracts
are on a per unit basis and revenue is recognized as each unit is completed and ready to ship and the performance obligation
is satisfied. Payment terms for module sales are generally based on milestones achieved through the manufacturing
timeline of the module.
Service agreements
Service agreements represent a single performance obligation whereby the Company performs all required maintenance
and monitoring functions, including replacement of modules, to ensure the power platform(s) under the service agreement
generate a minimum power output. To the extent the power platform(s) under service agreements do not achieve the
minimum power output, certain service agreements include a performance guarantee penalty. Performance guarantee
penalties represent variable consideration, which is estimated for each service agreement based on past experience, using
the expected value method. The consideration for each service agreement is recognized over time using costs incurred to
date relative to total estimated costs at completion to measure progress.
The Company reviews its cost estimates on service agreements on an annual basis and records any changes in estimates
on a cumulative catch-up basis.
Loss accruals for service agreements are recognized to the extent that the estimated remaining costs to satisfy the
performance obligation exceed the estimated remaining unrecognized consideration. Estimated losses are recognized in
the period in which losses are identified.
Payment terms for service agreements are generally ratable over the term of the agreement.
Advanced Technologies contracts
Advanced Technologies contracts include the promise to perform research and development services and, as such, this
represents one performance obligation. Revenue from most government sponsored Advanced Technologies projects is
recognized as direct costs are incurred plus allowable overhead less cost share requirements, if any. Revenue is only
recognized to the extent the contracts are funded. Revenue recognition for research performed under the EMTEC Joint
Development Agreement (as defined elsewhere herein) falls into the practical expedient category where revenue is
recorded consistent with the amounts the Company has the right to invoice.
Payments are based on costs incurred for government sponsored Advanced Technologies projects and payments under the
EMTEC Joint Development Agreement are based on contractual rates for time spent and material costs incurred.
Generation revenue
For certain project assets where customers purchase electricity from the Company under PPAs, the Company has
determined that these agreements should be accounted for as operating leases pursuant to ASC 842, Leases. Revenue is
recognized when electricity has been delivered based on the amount of electricity delivered at rates specified under the
contracts. Generation revenue, to the extent the related PPAs are within the scope of ASC 606, include a performance
obligation to provide 100% of the electricity output generated by the associated project asset to the customer. The promise
to provide electricity over the term of the PPA represents a single performance obligation, as it is a promise to transfer a
series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.
Revenue is recognized over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the
Company, and the Company satisfies its performance obligation. Revenue is recognized based on the output method as
there is a directly observable output to the customer-electricity delivered to the customer and immediately consumed.
Payments are based on actual power output and the contractual rate for electricity generated.
Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests
The Company has entered into tax equity financing transactions with certain participating companies for three partnerships
(as further described in Note 3. “Tax Equity Financings and Investment Tax Credit Sale”) as of October 31, 2024. These
transactions are structured as “partnership flips.” A “partnership flip” is a structure commonly used by tax equity investors
92
in financing renewable energy projects. The Company has determined, under the power and benefits criterion of ASC 810,
Consolidations, that the Company is the primary beneficiary in these three partnerships since the rights under the
agreements for the tax equity transactions are more protective in nature than participatory and, as such, these partnerships
will be accounted for as Variable Interest Entities (“VIE’s”) under U.S. GAAP. As the primary beneficiary, the Company
consolidates the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in our consolidated financial statements, and all
intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and these partnerships are eliminated. The Company has
recognized the share of the net assets of these partnerships as noncontrolling interests in its Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The income or loss allocations reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss may create
volatility in our reported results of operations, including potentially changing net loss attributable to stockholders to net
income attributable to stockholders, or vice versa, from quarter to quarter. The Company allocates profits and losses to the
participating companies’ noncontrolling interest under the HLBV method. See Note 3. “Tax Equity Financings and
Investment Tax Credit Sale” for additional information regarding the tax equity financing transactions.
Sale-Leaseback Accounting
The Company, through certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, has entered into sale-leaseback transactions for commissioned
project assets where we have entered into a PPA with a customer who is both the site host and end user of the power. Due
to the Company not meeting criteria to account for the transfer of the project assets as a sale since the leases include a
repurchase right, sale accounting is precluded. Accordingly, the Company uses the financing method to account for these
transactions.
Under the financing method of accounting for a sale-leaseback, the Company does not derecognize the project assets and
does not recognize as revenue any of the sale proceeds received from the lessor that contractually constitutes payment to
acquire the assets subject to these arrangements. Instead, the sale proceeds received are accounted for as finance obligations
and leaseback payments made by the Company are allocated between interest expense and a reduction to the finance
obligation. Interest on the finance obligation is calculated using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the inception
of the arrangement on the outstanding finance obligation. While we receive financing for the related project asset, we have
not recognized revenue on the sale-leaseback transactions. Instead, revenue is recognized with respect to the related PPAs
in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies for recognizing generation revenue.
Lease Accounting
Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities
represent the present value of the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease over the lease term
at the commencement date of the lease. As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company
estimated the incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the date of adoption in determining the
present value of lease payments and used the implicit rate when readily determinable. The Company determined
incremental borrowing rates through market sources for secured borrowings including relevant industry rates. The
Company’s operating lease ROU assets also include any lease pre-payments and exclude lease incentives. Certain of the
Company’s leases include variable payments, which may vary based upon changes in facts or circumstances after the start
of the lease. The Company excludes variable payments from lease ROU assets and lease liabilities to the extent not
considered in-substance fixed, and instead, expenses variable payments as incurred. Variable lease expense and lease
expense for short term contracts are not material components of lease expense. The Company’s leases generally have
remaining lease terms of approximately 1 to 21 years, some of which include options to extend the leases. The exercise of
lease renewal options is at the Company’s sole discretion and the Company’s lease ROU assets and liabilities reflect only
the options the Company is reasonably certain that it will exercise. We do not have leases with residual value guarantees
or similar covenants.
Service Expense Recognition
We warranty our products for a specific period of time against manufacturing or performance defects. Our U.S. warranty
is generally limited to a term of 15 months after shipment or 12 months after acceptance of our products. We accrue for
estimated future warranty costs based on historical experience. We also provide for a specific accrual if there is a known
issue requiring repair during the warranty period.
In addition to the standard product warranty, we have entered into service agreements with certain customers to provide
monitoring, maintenance and repair services for fuel cell power platforms. Under the terms of these service agreements,
93
the power platform must meet a minimum operating output during the term. If the minimum output falls below the contract
requirement, we may be subject to performance penalties or may be required to repair and/or replace the customer’s fuel
cell module(s).
The Company records loss accruals for service agreements when the estimated cost of future module exchanges and
maintenance and monitoring activities exceeds the remaining unrecognized contract value. Estimates for future costs on
service agreements are determined by a number of factors, including the estimated remaining life of the module(s), used
replacement modules available and future operating plans for the power platform. Our estimates are performed on a
contract by contract basis and include cost assumptions based on what we anticipate the service requirements will be to
fulfill obligations for each contract.
At the end of our service agreements, customers are expected to either renew the service agreement or, based on the
Company’s rights to title of the module, the module will be returned to the Company as the platform is no longer being
maintained.
Research and Development Costs
We perform both customer-sponsored research and development projects based on contractual agreements with customers
and company-sponsored research and development projects.
Costs incurred for customer-sponsored projects include manufacturing and engineering labor, applicable overhead
expenses, materials to build and test prototype units and other costs associated with customer-sponsored research and
development contracts. Costs incurred for customer-sponsored projects are recorded as cost of Advanced Technologies
contract revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Costs incurred for company-sponsored research and development projects consist primarily of labor, overhead, materials
to build and test prototype units and consulting fees. These costs are recorded as Research and development expenses in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Concentrations
We contract with a concentrated number of customers for the sale of our products, for service agreements, for power
purchase agreements and for Advanced Technologies contracts. For the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022,
our top customers accounted for 65%, 70% and 74%, respectively, of our total annual consolidated revenue.
The percent of consolidated revenues from our top customers for the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022,
respectively, are presented below.
Years Ended October 31,
2024
2023
2022
Connecticut Light and Power
21 %
13 %
14 %
Gyeonggi Green Energy Co., Ltd. (“GGE”)
18 %
— %
— %
Esso Nederland B.V. (“Esso”)
10 %
2 %
— %
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company (f/k/a ExxonMobil
Research and Engineering Company) (EMTEC)
8 %
8 %
8 %
Ameresco/Sacramento Sewer
7 %
— %
— %
Korea Southern Power Company (KOSPO)
1 %
31 %
6 %
Korea Fuel Cell Co., Ltd (KFC)
— %
16 %
46 %
Total
65 %
70 %
74 %
Derivatives
We do not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. The Company has an interest rate swap that is adjusted to
fair value on a quarterly basis. The estimated fair value is based on Level 2 inputs including primarily the floating Secured
Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) rate available to swap dealers. The valuation methodology involves comparison of
(i) the sum of the present value of all quarterly variable rate payments based on a reset rate using the floating SOFR curve
94
and (ii) the sum of the present value of all quarterly fixed rate payments on the notional amount, which is equivalent to the
outstanding principal amount of the loan.
The Company has recorded certain natural gas purchase contracts at fair value which was the result of the net settling of
certain natural gas purchases under contracts that were previously designated as normal purchase normal sale which
resulted in a change to mark-to-market accounting. The fair values are adjusted on a quarterly basis. The estimated fair
value is based on Level 2 inputs including future prices available to commodity brokers and risk-free rates which are based
on Federal reserve yields. The valuation methodology involves utilizing the industry-convention energy swap model.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, revenue
recognition, lease right-of-use assets and liabilities, excess, slow-moving and obsolete inventories, product warranty
accruals, loss accruals on service agreements, share-based compensation expense, allowance for doubtful accounts,
depreciation and amortization, impairment of goodwill and in-process research and development intangible assets,
impairment of long-lived assets (including project assets), valuation of derivatives and contingencies. Estimates and
assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements
in the period they are determined to be necessary. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual
results in future periods may differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The translation of the financial statements of FCE Korea Ltd., FCES GmbH and Versa Power Systems Ltd. results in
translation gains or losses, which are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss within Stockholders’ equity on
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We are also subject to foreign currency transaction gains and losses as certain transactions are denominated in foreign
currencies.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
There is no recently adopted accounting guidance applicable to the Company’s financial statements.
Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Effective
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to improve reportable segment
disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. In addition, the
guidance enhances interim disclosure requirements, clarifies circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple
segment measures of profit or loss, provides new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable
segment and contains other disclosure requirements. The purpose of the guidance is to enable investors to better understand
an entity’s overall performance and assess potential future cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is
permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued guidance to enhance income tax disclosures by providing information to better assess
how an entity’s operations, related tax risks, tax planning and operational opportunities affect its tax rate and prospects for
future cash flows. Additional disclosures will be required to the annual effective tax rate reconciliation including specific
categories and further disaggregated reconciling items that meet the quantitative threshold. Additionally, disclosures will
be required relating to income tax expense and payments made to federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2024. We are currently evaluating
the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued new guidance which requires enhanced disclosure of specified categories of expenses
included in certain expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. This guidance will be effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company
95
is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine its adoption approach and the impact on the presentation and
disclosures of its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company anticipates its processes
will be enhanced to address the disaggregation and disclosure requirements, though it does not expect adoption to impact
its overall results from operations.
Note 2. Revenue Recognition
Contract Balances
Contract assets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 were $65.1 million ($28.3 million long-term) and $42.1 million ($25.8
million long-term), respectively. The contract assets relate to the Company’s rights to consideration for work completed
but not yet billed. These amounts are included on a separate line item as Unbilled receivables, and balances expected to
be billed later than one year from the balance sheet date are included within Other assets on the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets. We bill customers for power platform and power platform component sales based on certain
contractual milestones being reached. We bill service agreements based on the contract price and billing terms of the
contracts. Generally, our Advanced Technologies contracts are billed based on actual revenues recorded, typically in the
subsequent month. Some Advanced Technologies contracts are billed based on contractual milestones or costs incurred.
The net change in contract assets represents amounts recognized as revenue offset by customer billings. For the years
ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, a total of $16.0 million and $12.9 million, respectively, was transferred to accounts
receivable from contract assets recognized at the beginning of the period.
Contract liabilities as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 were $7.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The contract
liabilities relate to the advance billings to customers for services that will be recognized over time and in some instances
for deferred revenue relating to variable consideration for previously sold products. The net change in contract liabilities
represents customer billings offset by revenue recognized.
Consideration Payable to a Customer
As of October 31, 2023, the Company had recorded $6.3 million ($6.0 million long-term) as consideration payable to
Toyota Motor North America (“Toyota”), which is included within Accrued liabilities and Long-term debt and other
liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company received payment for the sale of an investment
tax credit with respect to the Toyota project at the Port of Long Beach during the year ended October 31, 2023. The net
amount of $6.3 million is being recorded as a reduction to revenue during the period of measurement, which is the 20-year
term of the hydrogen production and power purchase agreement between Toyota and the Company (“Toyota HPPA”) that
commenced in the first quarter of fiscal year 2024. The balance as of October 31, 2024 is $6.0 million ($4.5 million long-
term).
Contract Modification
As a result of the settlement reached with POSCO Energy Co., Ltd. (“POSCO Energy”), the Company evaluated its various
license agreements with POSCO Energy as well as all of the terms of the settlement agreement with POSCO Energy,
which was effective December 20, 2021 (the “Settlement Agreement”). As part of this analysis, the Company considered
the accounting surrounding the execution of the Settlement Agreement, reviewed all elements related to its license
agreements with POSCO Energy and the Settlement Agreement and considered any potential contingencies in these license
agreements and whether any proceeds were related to the litigation settlement.
Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed that its license agreements with POSCO Energy were
not terminated, but instead were deemed to be amended such that POSCO Energy and its subsidiary, Korea Fuel Cell Co.,
Ltd. (“KFC”, and with POSCO Energy, collectively, “PE Group”), only have the right (i) to provide maintenance and
repair services to PE Group’s then existing customers on then existing molten carbonate power generation and thermal
projects under long-term service agreements then in force as well as long-term service agreements that had expired and
were pending renewal as of the settlement date (collectively, “Existing LTSAs”), (ii) to supply replacement modules
purchased from the Company only for their existing customers for existing molten carbonate power generation and thermal
projects under Existing LTSAs and (iii) to own, operate and maintain all facilities and factories solely for the purposes set
forth in (i) and (ii) above (collectively, the “Right to Service License”) and further agreed to sell modules with a service
warranty pursuant to a module sales agreement to be negotiated by the parties after execution of the Settlement Agreement.
96
As such, the Company considers the execution of the Settlement Agreement to be a contract modification as it resulted in
a change in both the scope and price of a contract with a customer. Therefore, the Company accounted for such
modification under the contract modification guidance included within ASC 606 (Revenue from Contracts with
Customers). Further, the Company noted that none of the parties to the Settlement Agreement specifically acknowledged
any payment of damages or reimbursement of any costs related to the matters settled under the Settlement Agreement,
which supports the conclusion that the overall settlement was a form of contract modification. Additionally, the transaction
price allocated to the modified contract did not exceed the stand-alone selling prices (“SSP”) of the performance
obligations under the modified contract such that there was no indication of a premium that would indicate that a portion
of the transaction price related to something other than the promised goods or services.
The Company identified two performance obligations in the Settlement Agreement which included the sale of 20 modules
and an option to purchase an additional 14 modules. The Company assessed the SSP of the modules utilizing a cost-plus
margin approach to arrive at $3.0 million per module which was recognized upon transfer of control of such modules to
KFC via title transfer consistent with the Company’s established revenue recognition policies. The Company is also
providing a performance guarantee for up to seven years with each module to cover any annual output penalty that would
need to be paid by PE Group to a customer. The Company determined that this performance guarantee represented variable
consideration and estimated a value of $0.65 million per module, which resulted in accrual of $13.1 million as of October
31, 2022 upon the sale of twenty modules during the year ended October 31, 2022. A portion of this variable consideration
was recognized as revenue when it was determined that there were no amounts due under the performance guarantee. In
its analysis at the time of execution of the Settlement Agreement, the Company determined that it was probable that KFC
would exercise its option to purchase an additional 14 modules (with a performance guarantee) beyond the firm order of
20 modules, to which it was contractually committed. KFC’s right to purchase the additional 14 modules expired without
being exercised on December 31, 2022, and as a result $9.1 million was recognized as product revenue during the year
ended October 31, 2023.
The Company signed a LTSA with Noeul Green Energy Co., Ltd. (“Noeul Green Energy”) in July 2023. Under this LTSA,
once the Company, KFC/POSCO International Company, and Noeul Green Energy (the “LTSA Parties”) agreed to the
technical transfer specifications under a Final Acceptance Test (the “FAT”) with respect to the transfer to Noeul Green
Energy of 16 of the 20 modules previously sold by the Company to KFC pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the LTSA
Parties signed a document that released KFC/POSCO International Company from any obligations to service these
modules, and concurrently transferred that obligation to the Company. The FAT is effective for 16 of the 20 modules sold
to KFC pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, which are now used by Noeul Green Energy. Because the Company is no
longer obligated to perform any service or other obligations under the Settlement Agreement with respect to the 16 modules
now used by Noeul Green Energy, the Company recognized a ratable portion of the previously accrued variable
consideration of $13.1 million which resulted in recognition of $10.5 million of product revenue during the year ended
October 31, 2023.
EMTEC Joint Development Agreement and Rotterdam Pilot Project Purchase Order
Effective as of October 31, 2019, the Company entered into a Joint Development Agreement (as amended, the “EMTEC
Joint Development Agreement”) with ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company (formerly known as
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company) (“EMTEC”), pursuant to which the Company has engaged in exclusive
research and development efforts with EMTEC to evaluate and develop new and/or improved carbonate fuel cells to reduce
carbon dioxide emissions from industrial and power sources, in exchange for (i) payment by EMTEC of certain fees and
costs (including research costs of up to $45.0 million) as well as certain milestone-based payments, and (ii) certain licenses.
In Amendment No. 1 to the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement (“Amendment No. 1”), which was executed on
October 29, 2021 and effective as of October 31, 2021, the Company and EMTEC agreed, among other things, to extend
the term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement to April 30, 2022. Amendment No. 1 allowed for the continuation
of research intended to enable incorporation of design improvements to Company fuel cell design in order to support a
decision to use the improvements in a potential future demonstration of the technology for capturing carbon at an
ExxonMobil refinery located in Rotterdam, Netherlands (such demonstration, the “Rotterdam Project”) and provided
additional time to achieve the first milestone under the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement.
In a related letter agreement between the Company and EMTEC, dated as of October 28, 2021 and executed on October
29, 2021 (the “2021 Letter Agreement”), the Company agreed to invest with EMTEC in the Rotterdam Project, should
EMTEC move forward with the Rotterdam Project. In the 2021 Letter Agreement, the Company agreed that, if (i) the
Company achieved the first milestone under the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement (which occurred in the first
97
quarter of fiscal year 2022, resulting in a $5.0 million payment to the Company which the Company received in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2022) and (ii) EMTEC and the Company executed a contractual agreement to proceed with the
Rotterdam Project, then at EMTEC’s option, the Company would either make an investment in the amount of $5.0 million
in the Rotterdam Project or discount EMTEC’s purchase of the Company’s fuel cell module and detailed engineering
design, as agreed to by the parties, required for the Rotterdam Project by said amount.
On April 29, 2022, the Company and EMTEC entered into Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to the EMTEC Joint
Development Agreement, which was effective as of April 30, 2022 and which increased the maximum amount of research
costs to be reimbursed by EMTEC from $45.0 million to $50.0 million and further extended the term to December 31,
2022. In Amendment No. 2, the Company and EMTEC also agreed to conduct a joint market study to (a) define application
opportunities, commercialization strategies, and development requirements, (b) identify partners for potential
pilot/demonstration projects and (c) assess fuel cell/stack/module manufacturing scale-up and cost reduction.
On December 19, 2022, the Company and EMTEC entered into Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment No. 3”) to the EMTEC
Joint Development Agreement, which was effective as of December 1, 2022. In Amendment No. 3, the Company and
EMTEC agreed to further extend the term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement such that it would end on August
31, 2023 and to further increase the maximum amount of research costs to be reimbursed by EMTEC from $50.0 million
to $60.0 million. Amendment No. 3 (i) allowed for continuation of research intended to enable the parties to finalize data
collection in support of the project gate decision for the Rotterdam Project, (ii) allowed for the continuation of the
development, engineering and mechanical derisking of the Generation 2 Technology fuel cell module prototype, and (iii)
allowed for studying the manufacturing scale-up and cost reduction of a commercial Generation 2 Technology fuel cell
carbon capture facility.
On August 25, 2023, the Company and EMTEC entered into Amendment No. 4 to the EMTEC Joint Development
Agreement (“Amendment No. 4”), effective as of August 31, 2023. In Amendment No. 4, the Company and EMTEC
agreed to further extend the term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement such that it would end on March 31, 2024
and to further increase the maximum amount of research costs to be reimbursed by EMTEC from $60.0 million to $67.0
million. Amendment No. 4 allowed the parties the opportunity to continue (i) derisking of the Generation 2 Technology
fuel cell module demonstration prototype and (ii) the joint marketing and sales efforts to inform development of a new
business framework between the parties beyond the current joint development agreement structure.
During the year ended October 31, 2022, the Company achieved the first technical milestone under the EMTEC Joint
Development Agreement and received payment of $5.0 million. At the time, the Company did not recognize revenue in
connection with this milestone achievement as a result of its agreement with EMTEC to either make a $5.0 million
investment in the Rotterdam Project or discount EMTEC’s purchase of the Company’s fuel cell module and detailed
engineering design for the Rotterdam Project by $5.0 million, should the Company enter into a contract with EMTEC to
proceed with the Rotterdam Project.
In May 2023, the Company entered into a second letter agreement with EMTEC, pursuant to which the parties agreed that
the conditions to the Company’s agreement to invest in the Rotterdam Project were met in April 2023 and, as a result, the
Company would recognize $2.5 million of the $5.0 million milestone payment received in fiscal year 2022 as revenue
across future deliverables to EMTEC. Of this $2.5 million, the Company recognized revenue of $1.7 million and $0.3
million during the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The other $2.5 million of the $5.0 million
milestone payment received under the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement in fiscal year 2022 was applied to discount
EMTEC’s purchase of the Company’s fuel cell module and detailed engineering design for the Rotterdam Project.
On January 31, 2024, the Company received a purchase order valued at $11.6 million from Esso Nederland B.V. (“Esso”),
an affiliate of Exxon Mobil Corporation and EMTEC, for fuel cell modules as well as engineering, procurement,
fabrication, testing and delivery services required for the construction and implementation of the modular point source
carbon capture pilot plant at the Rotterdam Project. The Company expects that this pilot plant will be completed and
commissioned early in calendar year 2026.
On and effective as of March 31, 2024, the Company and EMTEC entered into Amendment No. 5 (“Amendment No. 5”)
to the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement. In Amendment No. 5, the Company and EMTEC further extended the term
of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement such that it will end on December 31, 2026 (unless terminated earlier), so
that the Company and EMTEC may pursue continued work to allow for technical readiness of the Generation 2 Technology
fuel cell module as well as additional continuous technology development. In parallel with the EMTEC Joint Development
Agreement, the Company and EMTEC will pursue pioneer commercial deployments of the Generation 2 Technology with
98
third parties, with the Company as the fuel cell module manufacturer for such deployments. Amendment No. 5 also
removed the cap on the maximum amount of research costs to be reimbursed by EMTEC, and instead includes an expected
annual budget for the anticipated work through the remaining term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement of at
least $10.0 million per year, subject to approval by EMTEC.
In addition, Amendment No. 5 provides the Company with the ability to pursue new carbon capture projects with third
parties for the remaining duration of the term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement using Generation 1
Technology or Generation 2 Technology (provided that the use of Generation 2 Technology must be limited to the use of
Generation 2 physical fuel cell properties and design elements in Generation 1 Technology modules), with any new sales
of such activities, authorized work, and carbon capture projects, when summed together, having the capability of capturing
no more than 250,000 tons of CO2 on a cumulative annual basis. Under Amendment No. 5, following expiration of the
term of the Joint Development Agreement, the Company will also have the opportunity to continue to service continuing
obligations for such projects entered into during the term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement (e.g., completion
of contracted builds, service and repair/replacement of components, etc.). To allow the Company to pursue such projects,
in Amendment No. 5, EMTEC also granted to the Company a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable (during
the term of the EMTEC Joint Development Agreement), non-sub-licensable license to EMTEC’s Generation 1 Technology
as well as to EMTEC’s Generation 2 Technology physical fuel cell properties and design elements.
Long-Term Service Agreement with Gyeonggi Green Energy Co., Ltd.
On May 28, 2024, the Company and Gyeonggi Green Energy Co., Ltd. (“GGE”) entered into a LTSA with respect to
GGE’s 58.8 MW fuel cell power platform in Hwaseong-si, Korea (the “GGE Platform”). The GGE Platform is comprised
of 21 SureSource 3000 molten carbonate fuel cells (each a “Plant”). Each Plant is comprised of two 1.4-MW carbonate
fuel cell modules. Pursuant to the LTSA, GGE and the Company have agreed that (i) GGE will purchase from the Company
42 1.4-MW carbonate fuel cell modules to replace existing fuel cell modules at the GGE Platform, (ii) the Company will
provide certain balance of plant replacement components if and to the extent the parties reasonably determine existing
components should be replaced, and (iii) the Company will provide long term operations and maintenance services for the
GGE Platform. The total amount payable by GGE under the LTSA for the 42 replacement fuel cell modules, balance of
plant replacement components, and service is $159.6 million USD, with payments to be made over time as such
replacement fuel cell modules are commissioned and the service obligations under the LTSA for such Plants commence.
Of this $159.6 million, the Company recognized revenue of $18.0 million under Product revenues, and $1.9 million under
Service revenues during the year ended October 31, 2024.
Pursuant to the LTSA, the Company will provide various performance guarantees for each Plant related to power
generation, fuel consumption, water consumption and heat production. If a Plant fails to achieve such performance
requirements, the Company may be required to compensate GGE for such underperformance.
The Company’s service obligations under the LTSA will commence with respect to individual Plants as the Company
replaces each Plant’s existing fuel cell modules and commissions the replacement fuel cell modules. The term of the LTSA
with respect to each Plant will continue for seven years from the date of commissioning of the replacement fuel cell
modules for such Plant.
Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations are the aggregate amount of total contract transaction price that is unsatisfied or
partially unsatisfied. As of October 31, 2024, the Company’s total remaining performance obligations were: $172.4 million
for service agreements (expected to be recognized as revenue over approximately three to fifteen years which is based on
the remaining term of the service agreements), $389.0 million for generation PPAs (expected to be recognized as revenue
over approximately nineteen to twenty years based on the PPA terms remaining), $9.6 million for Advanced Technologies
contracts (expected to be recognized within approximately two years) and $111.3 million for product purchase agreements
(expected to be recognized as revenue over approximately two years based on the replacement schedule under the
applicable LTSA).
Note 3. Tax Equity Financings and Investment Tax Credit Sale
Derby Tax Equity Financing Transaction
99
The Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction on October 31, 2023 with Franklin Park for two fuel cell power
plant installations -- the 14.0 MW Derby Fuel Cell Project and the 2.8 MW SCEF Fuel Cell Project, both located in Derby,
Connecticut (collectively, the “Derby Projects”). Franklin Park’s tax equity commitment totaled $30.2 million. Of this
amount, approximately $9.1 million was received on October 31, 2023 and the remaining approximately $21.1 million
was received during the year ended October 31, 2024. In connection with the initial closing of this tax equity financing
transaction in fiscal year 2023, the Company paid closing costs of approximately $1.8 million, which included appraisal
fees, title insurance expenses and legal and consulting fees.
This transaction was structured as a “partnership flip”, which is a structure commonly used by tax equity investors in the
financing of renewable energy projects. Under this partnership flip structure, a partnership, in this case Derby Fuel Cell
Holdco, LLC (the “Derby Partnership”), was organized to acquire from FuelCell Energy Finance II, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, all outstanding equity interests in the Derby Projects. FuelCell Energy Finance II owns the
Derby Projects and is the party to the power purchase agreements and all project agreements. At the closing of the
transaction, the Derby Projects are owned by the Derby Partnership with Franklin Park, holding the Class A Units, and
Fuel Cell Energy Derby Finance Holdco, LLC holding the Class B Units.
Under most partnership flip structures, tax equity investors agree to receive a minimum target rate of return, typically on
an after-tax basis. Prior to receiving a contractual rate of return or a date specified in the contractual arrangements, Franklin
Park will receive substantially all of the non-cash value attributable to the Derby Projects, which includes accelerated
depreciation and Section 48(a) investment tax credits; however, the Company will receive a majority of the cash
distributions (based on the operating income of the Derby Projects), which are to be paid quarterly. After Franklin Park
receives its contractual rate of return, the Company will receive approximately 95% of the cash and tax allocations.
Since the Derby Projects became operational during the first quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Company has begun to allocate
profits and losses to noncontrolling interests under the HLBV method. For the year ended October 31, 2024, the net loss
attributable to noncontrolling interests totaled $(28.3) million. During the year ended October 31, 2024, the Company
made priority return distributions to Franklin Park of $1.0 million. There were no priority return distributions or amounts
allocated to noncontrolling interest for the years ended October 31, 2023 and 2022 for the Derby Partnership because the
Derby Projects were not yet operational during those years.
Groton Tax Equity Financing Transaction
The Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction in August 2021 with East West Bancorp, Inc. (“East West
Bank”) for the 7.4 MW fuel cell project located on the U.S. Navy Submarine Base in Groton, CT (the “Groton Project”).
East West Bank’s tax equity commitment totals $15 million.
This transaction was structured as a partnership flip. Under this partnership flip structure, a partnership, in this case Groton
Station Fuel Cell Holdco, LLC (the “Groton Partnership”), was organized to acquire from FuelCell Energy Finance II,
LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, all outstanding equity interests in Groton Station Fuel Cell, LLC (the
“Groton Project Company”) which in turn owns the Groton Project and is the party to the power purchase agreement and
all project agreements. At the closing of the transaction, the Groton Partnership is owned by East West Bank, holding
Class A Units, and Fuel Cell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC, a subsidiary of FuelCell Energy Finance, LLC, holding Class
B Units. The acquisition of the Groton Project Company by the Groton Partnership was funded in part by an initial draw
from East West Bank and funds contributed downstream to the Groton Partnership by the Company. The initial closing
occurred on August 4, 2021, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent (including the receipt of an appraisal
and confirmation that the Groton Project would be eligible for the investment tax credit under Section 48 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). In connection with the initial closing, the Company drew down $3.0 million, of
which approximately $0.8 million was used to pay closing costs including appraisal fees, title insurance expenses and legal
and consulting fees. Under the original terms of the Company’s agreement with East West Bank, the Company would have
been eligible to draw the remaining amount of the commitment, approximately $12 million, once the Groton Project
achieved commercial operations.
On July 7, 2022, the Company and East West Bank amended their tax equity financing agreement and extended the
commercial operations deadline to September 30, 2022. In addition, in the July 7, 2022 amendment to the tax equity
financing agreement, the terms of East West Bank’s remaining investment commitment of $12.0 million were modified
such that East West Bank will contribute $4.0 million on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the Groton
Project achieving commercial operations, rather than contributing the full $12.0 million when the Groton Project achieved
100
commercial operations. Such contributions are subject to certain customer conditions precedent, including a third-party
certification by an independent engineer that the plant is operating in conformance with the amended and restated power
purchase agreement. When such contributions are made by East West Bank, the funds will be distributed upstream to the
Company, as a reimbursement of prior construction costs incurred by the Company. In conjunction with this amendment,
the Company agreed to pay aggregate fees of $0.5 million (which are inclusive of the fees from the previous extensions of
the commercial operations deadline), which were payable by the Company upon commencement of commercial operations
of the plant.
On October 4, 2022, the Company and East West Bank further amended their tax equity financing agreement to extend
the deadline by which commercial operations were to be achieved at the Groton Project from September 30, 2022 to
November 30, 2022. In addition, modifications to the Groton Project documents between Connecticut Municipal Electric
Energy Cooperative (“CMEEC”) and the Company as a result of the agreement between those parties to commence
operations at less than 7.4 MW required the approval of East West Bank as part of East West Bank’s rights under the
agreement between East West Bank and the Company. On December 16, 2022, the Company and CMEEC agreed that,
for all purposes, the commercial operations date has occurred, and, accordingly, East West Bank no longer had a right to
have its investment returned as a result of the Company’s failure to achieve commercial operations in a timely fashion,
and this investment became a non-redeemable noncontrolling interest as of December 16, 2022. In addition, on December
16, 2022, the Company paid the aggregate fees of $0.5 million described above to East West Bank.
On December 16, 2022, the Company declared and, per the terms of the Amended and Restated Power Purchase
Agreement between the Company and CMEEC entered into on that date (the “Amended and Restated PPA”), CMEEC
agreed that the Groton Project was commercially operational at 6.0 MW. As of December 16, 2022, the Groton Project is
reported as a part of the Company’s generation operating portfolio. The Amended and Restated PPA allowed the Company
to operate the plants at a reduced output of approximately 6.0 MW while a Technical Improvement Plan (“TIP”) was
implemented with the goal of bringing the platform to its rated capacity of 7.4 MW by December 31, 2023. In conjunction
with entering into the Amended and Restated PPA, the Navy also provided its authorization to proceed with commercial
operations at 6.0 MW. The Company paid CMEEC an amendment fee of $1.2 million and incurred performance guarantee
fees under the Amended and Restated PPA as a result of operating at an output below 7.4 MW during implementation of
the TIP.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Company completed the TIP to bring the Groton Project to its rated capacity
and the Groton Project reached its design rated output of 7.4 MW. The Company achieved all conditions precedent required
for the first annual funding from East West Bank under the tax equity financing transaction between the Company and
East West Bank and, as a result, the Company received a $4.0 million contribution during the year ended October 31, 2024
which is recorded as noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Under most partnership flip structures, tax equity investors agree to receive a minimum target rate of return, typically on
an after-tax basis. Prior to receiving a contractual rate of return or a date specified in the contractual arrangements, East
West Bank will receive substantially all of the non-cash value attributable to the Groton Project, which includes accelerated
depreciation and Section 48(a) investment tax credits; however, the Company will receive a majority of the cash
distributions (based on the operating income of the Groton Project), which are paid quarterly. After East West Bank
receives its contractual rate of return, the Company will receive approximately 95% of the cash and tax allocations. The
Company (through a separate wholly owned entity) entered into a back leverage debt financing transaction during fiscal
year 2023 and is using the cash distributions from the Groton Partnership to service the debt (refer to Note. 12. “Debt” for
additional information). During the year ended October 31, 2024, the Company made priority return distributions to East
West Bank of $0.1 million. No priority return distributions were made during the years ended October 31, 2023 and 2022.
For the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023, the net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests totaled $3.5 million
and $2.5 million, respectively. There were no amounts allocated to noncontrolling interest for the year ended October 31,
2022 for the Groton Partnership.
Yaphank Tax Equity Financing Transaction
The Company closed on a tax equity financing transaction in November 2021 with Renewable Energy Investors, LLC
(“REI”) for the 7.4 MW fuel cell project (the “LIPA Yaphank Project”) located in Yaphank Long Island. REI’s tax equity
commitment totaled $12.4 million.
101
This transaction was structured as a partnership flip. Under this partnership flip structure, a partnership, in this case YTBFC
Holdco, LLC (the “Yaphank Partnership”), was organized to acquire from FuelCell Energy Finance II, LLC, a wholly-
owned subsidiary of the Company, all outstanding equity interests in Yaphank Fuel Cell Park, LLC, which in turn owns
the LIPA Yaphank Project and is the party to the power purchase agreement and all project agreements. REI holds Class
A Units in the Yaphank Partnership and a subsidiary of the Company holds the Class B Units. The initial funding occurred
on December 13, 2021, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent (including the receipt of an appraisal and
confirmation that the LIPA Yaphank Project would be eligible for the investment tax credit (“ITC”) under Section 48 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). In connection with the initial closing, the Company was able to draw
down approximately $3.2 million, of which approximately $0.4 million was used to pay closing costs, including title
insurance expenses and legal and consulting fees. The Company drew down the remaining amount of the commitment,
approximately $9.2 million, in December 2021 and January 2022, after the LIPA Yaphank Project achieved commercial
operation. These proceeds were partially offset by legal and advisory fees of approximately $0.4 million.
The Company determined during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 that there was an overpayment by REI of the Class
A Member Capital Contribution of $0.5 million and as such the Company refunded this amount back to REI, reducing the
REI tax equity commitment to $11.9 million. During the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company
made priority return distributions to REI of $0.6 million, $0 and $0.3 million, respectively, which was calculated at a
2.73% annual interest rate on invested tax equity capital.
Under a partnership flip structure, tax equity investors agree to receive a minimum target rate of return, typically on an
after-tax basis. Prior to receiving a contractual rate of return or a date specified in the contractual arrangements, REI will
receive substantially all of the non-cash value attributable to the LIPA Yaphank Project, which includes accelerated
depreciation and Section 48(a) investment tax credits; however, the Company will receive a majority of the cash
distributions (based on the operating income of the LIPA Yaphank Project), which are paid quarterly. After REI receives
its contractual rate of return, the Company will receive approximately 95% of the cash and tax allocations.
Under this partnership flip structure, after the fifth anniversary following achievement of commercial operations, we have
an option to acquire all of the equity interests that REI holds in the Yaphank Partnership starting after REI receives its
contractual rate of return (the anticipated “flip” date) after the LIPA Yaphank Project is operational. If we exercise this
option, we will be required to pay the greater of the following: (i) the fair market value of REI's equity interest at the time
the option is exercised or (ii) an amount equal to 10.3% of REI’s capital contributions. This option payment is to be grossed
up for federal taxes if it exceeds the tax basis of the Yaphank Partnership Class A Units.
For the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest for the
Yaphank Partnership totaled $0.9 million, $2.0 million and ($4.5) million, respectively.
Toyota Investment Tax Credit Sale
On October 31, 2023, REI purchased investment tax credits (“ITCs”) from Long Beach Trigen, LLC (“LB Seller”), a
subsidiary of the Company. The Toyota project qualified for $8.4 million of ITCs. The total amount of the purchase was
$7.1 million or $0.85 per $1.00 of purchased ITCs. The Company incurred transaction costs of $0.4 million for legal costs
and advisory fees. Toyota Motor North America (“Toyota”) has a contractual right under the Toyota HPPA to receive the
benefit of the ITCs and, as a result, the Company recorded the value of the net amount due to Toyota as an accrued liability
totaling $6.3 million, which will be reduced over time based on the performance under the terms of the contract with
Toyota (see Note 10. “Accrued Liabilities” for further information). The balance of this accrued liability is $6.0 million as
of October 31, 2024.
Note 4. Restructuring
On September 5, 2024, the Company undertook a restructuring, which included a reduction in force that represented
approximately 4% of the Company’s global workforce, to reduce costs and align production levels with then-current levels
of demand in a manner that is consistent with the Company’s long-term strategic plan. The workforce was reduced across
our global operations including Calgary, Canada and at our North American production facility in Torrington, Connecticut,
at corporate offices in Danbury, Connecticut and at other remote locations. Restructuring expense relating to severance
for eliminated positions of $2.6 million was recognized in the year ended October 31, 2024, which has been presented
under a separate caption in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of October 31, 2024, $0.3 million of the
102
restructuring expense had been paid out, and the remaining balance is included within Accrued liabilities on the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Refer to Note. 22. “Subsequent Events” for additional information on the restructuring activities that were announced in
November 2024.
Note 5. Investments – Short-Term
The Company’s U.S. Treasury Securities outstanding as of October 31, 2024 had maturity dates ranging from November
5, 2024 to November 29, 2024. We have classified our investments in U.S. Treasury Securities as held-to-maturity and
recorded them at amortized cost. The following table summarizes the amortized cost basis and fair value (based on quoted
market prices) as of October 31, 2024 (in thousands).
Amortized
Gross unrealized Gross unrealized
cost
gains
losses
Fair value
U.S. Treasury Securities
As of October 31, 2024
$ 109,123 $
2 $
- $ 109,125
As of October 31, 2023
$ 103,760 $
1 $
- $ 103,761
The weighted average yield to maturity as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 was 4.78% and 5.45%, respectively.
Note 6. Inventories
Inventories (short and long-term) as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 31,
October 31,
2024
2023
Raw materials
$
35,989
$
36,200
Work-in-process (1)
80,457
55,585
Inventories
116,446
91,785
Inventories – current
(113,703)
(84,456)
Inventories – long-term (2)
$
2,743
$
7,329
(1) Work-in-process includes the standard components of inventory used to build the typical modules or module
components that are intended to be used in future project asset construction or power platform orders or for use under
the Company’s service agreements.
(2) Long-term inventory includes modules that are contractually required to be segregated for use as replacement modules
for a specific project asset.
Raw materials consist mainly of various nickel powders and steels, various other components used in producing cell stacks
and purchased components for BOP. Work-in-process inventory is comprised of material, labor, and overhead costs
incurred to build fuel cell stacks and modules, which are subcomponents of a power platform.
Note 7. Project Assets
Project assets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 31,
October 31,
Estimated
2024
2023
Useful Life
Project Assets – Operating
$
308,503
$
213,753
4-20 years
Accumulated depreciation
(66,542)
(46,263)
Project Assets – Operating, net
241,961
167,490
Project Assets – Construction in progress
170
90,576
7-20 years
Project Assets, net
$
242,131
$
258,066
The estimated useful lives of these project assets are 20 years for BOP and site construction, and four to seven years for
modules. Project assets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 included twelve and nine, respectively, completed, commissioned
103
installations generating power with respect to which the Company has a PPA with the end-user of power and site host with
a net aggregate value of $242.0 million and $167.5 million as of October 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Certain of these
assets are the subject of sale-leaseback arrangements with Crestmark. The increase in operating project assets as of October
31, 2024, compared to October 31, 2023, is a result of the inclusion of the Toyota project and the Derby Projects, all of
which became operational during the year ended October 31, 2024.
Project assets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 also include installations with carrying values of $0.2 million and $90.6
million, respectively, which are being developed and constructed by the Company in connection with projects for which
we have entered into PPAs or projects for which we expect to secure PPAs or otherwise recover the asset value and which
have not yet been placed in service.
Fiscal Year 2024 Charges, Including Impairment Charges
The 250 kW Trinity College project and the 1.0 MW UConn project were included in “Construction in progress” as of
October 31, 2024. The units to be installed at Trinity College and UConn are first article units of our solid oxide fuel cell
(“SOFC”) product. In reviewing our project cost estimates for these PPAs during the third quarter of fiscal year 2024, it
was determined that the expected project costs for these contracts would exceed the expected cash flows and therefore an
impairment charge was required. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.3 million that represents
the unrecoverable costs incurred through October 31, 2024 for the Trinity College and UConn projects, which have been
expensed as generation cost of revenues.
In addition, the Company incurred additional non-recoverable costs of $3.6 million associated with work at the Toyota
site for the installation of ancillary equipment. This is consistent with non-recoverable costs at the Toyota project that were
expensed as generation cost of revenues, as discussed in the fiscal year 2023 and fiscal year 2022 discussions below.
Fiscal Year 2023 Charges, Including Impairment Charges
The Toyota project was included in “Construction in progress” as of October 31, 2023. It was determined in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2021 that a potential source of renewable natural gas (“RNG”) at favorable pricing was no longer
sufficiently probable and that market pricing for RNG had significantly increased, resulting in the determination that the
project was expected to generate negative cash flows and that, therefore, the carrying value of the project asset was no
longer recoverable. Refer to Note 20. “Commitments and Contingencies” for more information regarding fuel risk
exposure. As this project was being constructed, only inventory components that could be redeployed for alternative use
were capitalized. For the year ended October 31, 2023, non-recoverable costs incurred of $22.9 million have been
expensed as generation cost of revenues.
During fiscal year 2023, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.4 million related to a project for which a PPA
was ultimately not awarded.
Fiscal Year 2022 Charges, Including Impairment Charges
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022, the Company made the decision not to proceed with development of the 7.4 MW
and 1.0 MW Hartford projects given the then current economic profile of these projects. As a result, the Company recorded
a $0.8 million impairment charge.
Charges for the year ended October 31, 2022 relating to the Toyota project were $22.1 million, which represented the
carrying value of the project asset less the carrying value of inventory components that could be redeployed for alternative
use.
Impairment charges are recorded as cost of generation revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Loss.
Depreciation expense for project assets was $26.9 million, $19.0 million and $14.2 million for the years ended October 31,
2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Project construction costs incurred for long-term project assets are reported as investing activities in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. The proceeds received from the sale and subsequent leaseback of project assets are classified
104
as “Cash flows from financing activities” within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and are classified as a finance
obligation within “Current portion of long-term debt” and “Long-term debt and other liabilities” on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets (refer to Note 12. “Debt” for more information).
Note 8. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 31,
October 31,
Estimated
2024
2023
Useful Life
Land
$
524
$
524
—
Building and improvements
26,581
21,430
ဩ\HDUV
Machinery, equipment and software
144,242
136,554
ဩ\HDUV
Furniture and fixtures
5,451
5,211
10 years
Construction in progress
68,588
33,950
—
245,386
197,669
Accumulated depreciation
(114,700)
(108,001)
Property, plant and equipment, net
$ 130,686
$
89,668
The Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.0 million during the year ended October 31, 2022
(related to the cessation of operations at a conditioning facility in Danbury, CT, which was replaced by a new conditioning
facility located at our Torrington, CT manufacturing facility). There were no impairments of property, plant and equipment
for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023.
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $8.0 million, $5.1 million and $5.8 million for the years ended
October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Note 9. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had goodwill of $4.1 million and intangible assets of $14.8 million and
$16.1 million, respectively, that were recorded in connection with the Company’s 2012 acquisition of Versa Inc. and the
2019 Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project acquisition.
The Versa Inc. acquisition intangible asset represents indefinite-lived IPR&D for cumulative research and development
efforts associated with the development of solid oxide fuel cell stationary power generation. The Company completed its
annual impairment analysis of goodwill and IPR&D assets as of July 31, 2024. The Company performed a qualitative
analysis for fiscal year 2024 and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill or the indefinite-lived intangible
asset. Additionally, there were no impairments of goodwill or the indefinite-lived intangible asset during fiscal years 2023
and 2022.
Amortization expense for the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project-related intangible asset was $1.3 million for each of the years
ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
The following tables summarize the Company’s intangible assets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
As of October 31, 2024
Gross Amount
Accumulated
Amortization Net Amount
In-Process Research and Development
$
9,592
$
-
$
9,592
Bridgeport PPA
12,320
(7,133)
5,187
Total
$
21,912
$
(7,133)
$
14,779
As of October 31, 2023
Gross Amount
Accumulated
Amortization Net Amount
In-Process Research and Development
$
9,592
$
-
$
9,592
Bridgeport PPA
12,320
(5,836)
6,484
Total
$
21,912
$
(5,836)
$
16,076
105
Amortization expense is recorded on a straight-line basis and future amortization expense will be $1.3 million per year
until the Bridgeport PPA is fully amortized.
Note 10. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 31,
October 31,
2024
2023
Accrued payroll and employee benefits (1)
$
9,808
$
7,752
Consideration payable to a customer (2)
2,515
3,958
Accrued service agreement and PPA costs (3)
10,574
10,742
Accrued legal, taxes, professional and other
5,230
3,861
Accrued severance costs (4)
2,235
-
Accrued liabilities
$
30,362
$
26,313
(1) The balance in this account represents accrued payroll, payroll taxes and accrued bonus for both periods. The increase
in the account balance relates to an increase in accrued bonus as of October 31, 2024.
(2) The balance represents the net amount due to Toyota as an accrued liability which will be reduced over time based on
the performance under the terms of the Toyota HPPA.
(3) Accrued service agreement costs include loss accruals on service contracts of $9.0 million as of October 31, 2024,
which decreased from $9.5 million as of October 31, 2023. The decrease is the result of changes in estimates regarding
timing of future module exchanges and future module replacement costs. The accruals for performance guarantees on
service agreements and PPAs increased from $1.2 million as of October 31, 2023 to $1.5 million as of October 31,
2024.
(4) Accrued severance costs represent amounts accrued relating to restructuring activities and workforce reductions that
occurred in September 2024. Refer to Note 4. “Restructuring” for more information about the restructuring.
Note 11. Leases
The Company enters into operating and finance lease agreements for the use of real estate, vehicles, information
technology equipment, and certain other equipment. We determine if an arrangement contains a lease at inception, which
is the date on which the terms of the contract are agreed to and the agreement creates enforceable rights and obligations.
The impacts of accounting for operating leases are included in Operating lease right-of-use assets, Operating lease
liabilities, and Long-term operating lease liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finance leases are not
considered significant to the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Loss.
Operating lease expense for the year ended October 31, 2024 was $1.4 million. Operating lease expense for each of
the years ended October 31, 2023 and 2022 was $1.5 million. As of October 31, 2024, the weighted average remaining
lease term (in years) was approximately 16 years and the weighted average discount rate was 6.9%. Lease payments made
during the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 totaled $1.3 million, $1.2 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.
As of October 31, 2024, undiscounted maturities of operating lease liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
Operating
Leases
Due Year 1
$
1,361
Due Year 2
1,374
Due Year 3
1,407
Due Year 4
1,375
Due Year 5
795
Thereafter
11,923
Total undiscounted lease payments
18,235
Less imputed interest
(8,534)
Total discounted lease payments
$
9,701
106
Note 12. Debt
Debt as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 31,
October 31,
2024
2023
Export-Import Bank of the United States Financing Facility
$
10,104
$
—
Liberty Bank Term Loan Agreement (Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility)
5,825
—
Connecticut Green Bank Term Loan Agreement (Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility)
2,689
—
Connecticut Green Bank Loan (Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility)
3,500
—
Connecticut Green Bank Loan (Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility)
8,000
8,000
Liberty Bank Term Loan Agreement (Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility)
5,437
5,876
Amalgamated Bank Loan (Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility)
5,420
5,873
Finance obligation for sale-leaseback transactions
18,811
18,814
State of Connecticut Loan
6,024
6,908
Finance lease obligations
—
12
OpCo Financing Facility
70,067
77,510
Deferred finance costs
(4,215)
(3,526)
Total debt and finance obligations
131,662
119,467
Current portion of long-term debt and finance obligations
(15,924)
(10,067)
Long-term debt and finance obligations
$ 115,738
$ 109,400
Aggregate annual principal payments under our loan agreements, finance obligation, and finance lease obligations for
the years subsequent to October 31, 2024 are as follows (in thousands):
Year 1
$
14,440
Year 2
14,759
Year 3
10,930
Year 4
12,237
Year 5
11,305
Thereafter (1)
61,659
$
125,330
(1) The annual principal payments included above only include sale-leaseback payments whereas the difference between
debt outstanding as of October 31, 2024 and the annual principal payments represent accreted interest and amounts
included in the finance obligation that exceed required principal payments.
107
EXIM Financing
On October 31, 2024, the Company closed on a project debt financing transaction with the Export-Import Bank of the
United States (“EXIM”) to support the Company’s obligations under the LTSA with GGE, pursuant to which the Company
is to supply GGE with forty-two 1.4-megawatt upgraded carbonate fuel cell modules to replace existing units at GGE’s
Hwaseong Baran Industrial Complex. In conjunction with this financing, the Company entered into a promissory note and
related security agreements securing the loan with equipment liens, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $10.1
million. Interest accrues at a fixed interest rate of 5.81%, and the note is repayable in monthly installments consisting of
interest and principal over 7 years from the date of the first debt payment, which is due in January of 2025. After payment
of customary fees and transaction costs, net proceeds were approximately $9.2 million.
The credit agreement between the Company and EXIM contains certain reporting requirements and other affirmative and
negative covenants which are customary for transactions of this type. In addition, the Company is required to maintain,
throughout the term of the credit agreement, a minimum cash balance of $100.0 million. For the purposes of this credit
agreement, cash is defined as the sum of unrestricted cash plus all short-term (but no longer than three months), marketable
United States Treasury instruments (as measured based on the maturity amount of each instrument).
Derby Back Leverage Financing
On April 25, 2024, FuelCell Energy Derby Finance Holdco, LLC (“Derby Holdco Borrower”), a wholly owned subsidiary
of FuelCell Energy Finance, LLC (“FCEF”), which, in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of FuelCell Energy, Inc.
(“Parent”), entered into: (i) a Credit Agreement (the “Derby Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement”) with, by and among
Liberty Bank, in its capacities as a lender (“Liberty Lender”), administrative agent (the “Senior Administrative Agent”),
and lead arranger, and Connecticut Green Bank, in its capacity as a lender (“Green Bank Lender” and, collectively with
Liberty Lender, the “Derby Senior Back Leverage Lenders”), for a term loan facility in an amount not to exceed an
aggregate of $9.5 million to be provided 68% by Liberty Lender and 32% by Green Bank Lender (such facility, the “Derby
Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility,” each such term loan, a “Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan” and such term loans
together, the “Derby Senior Back Leverage Loans”); and (ii) a Credit Agreement (the “Derby Subordinated Back Leverage
Credit Agreement”) with Connecticut Green Bank, as administrative agent (the “Subordinated Administrative Agent”) and
lender (“Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Lender”), for a term loan facility in an amount not to exceed $3.5 million
(such facility, the “Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility” and such term loan, the “Derby Subordinated Back
Leverage Loan”). The Derby Senior Back Leverage Lenders and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Lender are
referred to collectively as the “Derby Back Leverage Lenders.”
Derby Holdco Borrower’s obligations under the Derby Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement and the Derby
Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on all of Derby Holdco Borrower’s assets, consisting
principally of its Class B Member Interests (the “Derby Class B Interests”) in Derby Fuel Cell Holdco, LLC (the “Derby
Tax Equity Holdco”). The Class A Membership Interests (the “Derby Class A Interests”) in the Derby Tax Equity Holdco
are held by Franklin Park (see Note 1 for further discussion of the tax equity financing transaction structure).
Derby Holdco Borrower is also the Managing Member of the Derby Tax Equity Holdco. The Derby Tax Equity Holdco’s
primary asset is ownership of all of the outstanding equity interests in Derby Station Fuel Cell, LLC and SCEF1 Fuel Cell,
LLC (the “Derby Project Companies”). The Derby Project Companies, in turn, are the owners of the fuel cell power plants
located in Derby, Connecticut (which are referred to herein as the “Derby Projects”). As additional context concerning
the relationship among the parties with respect to the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Derby
Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility more fully described below, on October 19, 2018, the Derby Project Companies
and Parent entered into an Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (the “Derby Amended and Restated PPA”)
with The Connecticut Light and Power Company d/b/a Eversource Energy (“CLPC”), pursuant to which the Derby Project
Companies agreed to sell to CLPC, and CLPC agreed to purchase from the Derby Project Companies, all of the electricity
output produced by the Derby Projects pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Derby Amended and Restated PPA.
At the closing (the “Derby Closing”) of each of the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Derby Subordinated
Back Leverage Loan Facility, which occurred simultaneously on April 25, 2024 (the “Derby Closing Date”), the entire
amount of each of the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility
was drawn down in the aggregate amount of $13.0 million. After payment of fees and transaction costs (including fees to
the Derby Back Leverage Lenders and legal costs) of approximately $0.2 million in the aggregate, the remaining proceeds
of approximately $12.8 million were used as follows: (i) approximately $0.9 million was used to fund debt service and
module replacement reserve accounts (“DSCR Reserve Accounts”) for the Derby Senior Back Leverage Lenders in
108
amounts of approximately $0.6 million for Liberty Lender and approximately $0.3 million for Green Bank Lender; (ii)
approximately $0.4 million was used to fund a DSCR Reserve Account for the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Lender;
and (iii) the remaining amount of approximately $11.5 million was released to Parent from the Derby Back Leverage
Lenders. Additionally, the Company incurred legal fees of approximately $0.2 million in relation to the financing that
was not deducted from the debt proceeds.
The Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan will accrue interest on the unpaid principal amount calculated from the date of
such Derby Senior Back Leverage Loan until the maturity date at a rate per annum equal to 7.25%. Quarterly principal
amortization and interest payments are required to be made by Derby Holdco Borrower on the Derby Senior Back Leverage
Loan based on a seven-year amortization period. The Derby Senior Back Leverage Loans have a seven-year term, maturing
on March 31, 2031.
The Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan will accrue interest on the unpaid principal amount calculated from the date
of such Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan until the maturity date at a rate per annum equal to 8%. Pursuant to the
Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility, during the “Derby Interest Only Period” (as defined below), Derby
Holdco Borrower is required to make quarterly payments of interest only until June 30, 2031. Following the end of the
“Derby Interest Only Period,” principal and interest payments are required to be made quarterly in quarterly level payments
(“mortgage style”) of principal and interest until the maturity date on March 31, 2038.
Each of the Derby Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement
contains certain reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants which are customary for transactions
of this type. Included in the covenants are covenants that: (i) Derby Holdco Borrower maintain a “Senior” debt service
coverage ratio (which is computed taking into account debt service obligations on the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loans)
of not less than 1.25:1.00 (based on the trailing 12 months and tested every quarter) and a “Total” debt service coverage
ratio (which is computed taking into account debt service obligations on both the Derby Senior Back Leverage Loans and
the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan) of not less than 1.10:1.00 (based on the trailing 12 months and tested on a
quarterly basis); (ii) Derby Holdco Borrower may make distributions or dividends only if the foregoing debt to equity
coverage ratios have been satisfied and Derby Holdco Borrower is not in default under any provisions of either the Derby
Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement or the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement, including having
made all required deposits into reserve accounts; (iii) Derby Holdco Borrower is required to exercise its right under the
Derby Tax Equity Holdco limited liability company agreement to acquire the Derby Class A Interests from Franklin Park
during the ninety day period beginning on the “Flip Point” (which, pursuant to the Derby Tax Equity Holdco limited
liability company agreement, is the date on which the holder of Derby Class A Interests has realized a certain return on
investment and, accordingly, Derby Holdco Borrower, as holder of the Derby Class B Interests, has the right to purchase
the Derby Class A Interests); and (iv) the consent of the Senior Administrative Agent is required prior to Derby Holdco
Borrower’s taking certain material actions under the Derby Tax Equity Holdco limited liability company agreement. Each
of the Derby Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement and the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement also
contains customary representations and warranties and customary events of default that cause, or entitle the Derby Back
Leverage Lenders to cause, the outstanding loans to become immediately due and payable. In addition to customary events
of default for transactions of this kind, the events of default include if a Change of Control occurs (meaning Parent no
longer directly or indirectly owns Derby Holdco Borrower), a cross default (meaning that a default under the Derby Senior
Back Leverage Loan Facility shall be deemed a default under the Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility and
vice versa) or if CLPC should become insolvent, is in bankruptcy or commits a specified number of payment defaults with
regard to its payment obligations to the Derby Project Companies.
The Derby Senior Back Leverage Loans may be prepaid at any time at the option of Derby Holdco Borrower provided
that (i) each prepayment on or prior to the second anniversary of the Derby Closing Date shall require a prepayment fee
of 3% of the principal amount being prepaid; (ii) each prepayment after the second anniversary of the Derby Closing Date
but on or prior to the fourth anniversary of the Derby Closing Date shall require a prepayment fee of 2% of the principal
amount being prepaid; and (iii) each prepayment after the fourth anniversary of the Derby Closing Date but on or prior to
the seventh anniversary of the Derby Closing Date shall require a prepayment fee of 1% of the principal amount being
prepaid. The Derby Subordinated Back Leverage Loan may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty.
OpCo Financing Facility
On May 19, 2023, FuelCell Energy Opco Finance 1, LLC (“OpCo Borrower”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FCEF, which,
in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of FuelCell Energy, Inc. (“Parent”), entered into a Financing Agreement (as amended,
109
the “Financing Agreement”) with, by and among Investec Bank plc in its capacities as a lender (“Investec Lender”),
administrative agent (“Administrative Agent”), and collateral agent (“Collateral Agent”); Investec, Inc. as coordinating
lead arranger and sole bookrunner; Bank of Montreal (Chicago Branch) in its capacity as a lender (“BMO Lender”) and
as mandated lead arranger; and each of Liberty Bank, Amalgamated Bank and Connecticut Green Bank as lenders
(collectively with Investec Lender and BMO Lender, the “Lenders”) for a term loan facility in an amount not to exceed
$80.5 million (the “Term Loan Facility” and such term loan, the “Term Loan”) and a letter of credit facility in an amount
not to exceed $6.5 million (the “LC Facility” and together with the Term Loan Facility, the “OpCo Financing Facility”).
OpCo Borrower’s obligations under the Financing Agreement are secured by Parent’s interest in six operating fuel cell
generation projects: (i) the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project, located in Bridgeport, Connecticut; (ii) the Central CT State
University Project, located in New Britain, Connecticut; (iii) the Pfizer Project, located in Groton, Connecticut; (iv) the
LIPA Yaphank Project, located in Long Island, New York; (v) the Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant Project,
located in Riverside, California; and (vi) the Santa Rita Jail Project, located in Alameda County, California (each, a
“Project” and collectively, the “Projects”).
Immediately prior to the closing on the OpCo Financing Facility, which closing occurred on May 19, 2023, Parent caused
to be transferred to OpCo Borrower all of the outstanding equity interests in: (i) Bridgeport Fuel Cell, LLC (the “Bridgeport
Project Company”), the entity that owns the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project; (ii) New Britain Renewable Energy, LLC (the
“CCSU Project Company”), the entity that owns the Central CT State University Project; (iii) Groton Fuel Cell 1, LLC
(the “Pfizer Project Company”), the entity that owns the Pfizer Project; (iv) Riverside Fuel Cell, LLC (the “Riverside
Project Company”), the entity that owns the Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant Project; (v) SRJFC, LLC (the
“Santa Rita Project Company”), the entity that owns the Santa Rita Jail Project; and (vi) Fuel Cell YT Holdco, LLC (the
“Class B Member”), the entity that owns Parent’s Class B membership interest in YTBFC Holdco, LLC (the “Yaphank
Tax Equity Partnership”), the tax equity partnership with Renewable Energy Investors, LLC (the “Class A Member”), as
tax equity investor, which Yaphank Tax Equity Partnership, in turn, owns Yaphank Fuel Cell Park, LLC (the “Yaphank
Project Company”), the entity that owns the LIPA Yaphank Project.
At the time of closing on the OpCo Financing Facility: (i) the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project was encumbered by senior and
subordinated indebtedness to Liberty Bank, Fifth Third Bank and Connecticut Green Bank in the aggregate amount of
approximately $11.4 million; and (ii) the Pfizer Project, the Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant Project and
the Santa Rita Jail Project were subject to sale and leaseback transactions and agreements with PNC Energy Capital, LLC
(“PNC”) in which the lease buyout amounts, including sales taxes, were approximately $15.7 million, $3.7 million and
$2.8 million, respectively. In connection with closing on the OpCo Financing Facility, all of the foregoing indebtedness
and lease buyout amounts were repaid and extinguished with proceeds of the Term Loan and funds of approximately $7.3
million that were released from restricted and unrestricted reserve accounts held at PNC at the time of closing, resulting
in the applicable project companies re-acquiring ownership of the three leased projects from PNC, the termination of the
agreements with PNC related to the sale-leaseback transactions, and the termination of the senior and subordinated credit
agreements with, the related promissory notes issued to, and the related pledge and security agreements with, Liberty
Bank, Fifth Third Bank and Connecticut Green Bank related to the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project. Further, in connection
with the closing on the OpCo Financing Facility and the termination of the senior and subordinated credit agreements with
Liberty Bank, Fifth Third Bank and Connecticut Green Bank related to the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project, Fifth Third Bank
and the Bridgeport Project Company agreed that the obligations arising out of the swap transactions contemplated by their
related interest rate swap agreement were terminated and waived and the swap agreement was effectively terminated. In
addition, in connection with closing on the OpCo Financing Facility, proceeds of the Term Loan were used to repay a
portion of Parent’s long-term indebtedness to Connecticut Green Bank in the amount of approximately $1.8 million.
At the closing, $80.5 million, the entire amount of the Term Loan portion of the OpCo Financing Facility, was drawn
down. After payment of fees and transaction costs (including fees to the Lenders and legal costs) of approximately $2.9
million in the aggregate, the remaining proceeds of approximately $77.6 million were used as follows: (i) approximately
$15.0 million was used (in addition to the approximately $7.3 million released from restricted and unrestricted reserve
accounts held at PNC) to pay the lease buyout amounts and sales taxes referred to above and to re-acquire the three projects
owned by PNC as referred to above; (ii) approximately $11.4 million was used to extinguish the indebtedness to Liberty
Bank, Fifth Third Bank, and Connecticut Green Bank relating to the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project; (iii) approximately $1.8
million was used to repay a portion of Parent’s long-term indebtedness to Connecticut Green Bank; (iv) $14.5 million was
used to fund a capital expenditure reserve account required to be maintained pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Financing Agreement (which is classified as restricted cash on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets); and
(v) approximately $34.9 million was distributed to Parent for use as Parent determines in its sole discretion. In addition,
110
in connection with the extinguishment of the Company’s indebtedness to Liberty Bank and Fifth Third Bank referred to
above, approximately $11.2 million of restricted cash was released to the Company from Liberty Bank and Fifth Third
Bank. Taking into consideration the release of such funds, the total net proceeds to the Company from these transactions
were approximately $46.1 million.
The Term Loan portion of the OpCo Financing Facility will accrue interest on the unpaid principal amount calculated from
the date of such Term Loan until the maturity date thereof at a rate per annum during each Interest Period (as defined in
the Financing Agreement) for such Term Loan equal to (A) with respect to SOFR Rate Loans, (i) the Adjusted Daily
Compounded SOFR for such Interest Period with respect to SOFR Rate Loans plus (ii) the Applicable Margin, and
(B) with respect to Base Rate Loans, (i) the Base Rate from time to time in effect plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (in each
case as defined in the Financing Agreement). The Applicable Margin for SOFR Rate Loans is 2.5% for the first four years
of the term and thereafter, 3%. The Applicable Margin for Base Rate Loans is 1.5% for the first four years of the term and
thereafter, 2%. At the closing, in connection with the draw down of the entire amount of the Term Loan, OpCo Borrower
elected to make such draw down a SOFR Rate Loan with an initial Interest Period of three months. After the initial Interest
Period of three months, OpCo Borrower may elect both the applicable Interest Period (i.e., one month, three months or six
months) and whether the Term Loan will be treated as a SOFR Rate Loan or a Base Rate Loan for such Interest Period.
Interest payments are required to be made quarterly.
Quarterly principal amortization obligations are also required to be made (based on 17-year principal amortization
designed to be fully repaid in 2039), with quarterly amortization payments based on a 1.30x debt service coverage ratio
sizing based on contracted cash flows (before giving effect to module replacement expenses and module replacement
drawdown releases). The Term Loan has a seven-year term, maturing on May 19, 2030.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Financing Agreement, OpCo Borrower is required to maintain a capital
expenditures reserve to pay for expected module replacements. The total reserve balance is required to reach $29.0 million,
$14.5 million of which was funded out of the closing advance of the Term Loan and the remainder of which is to be funded
pursuant to an agreed upon funding schedule through cash flows generated by the Projects set forth in the Financing
Agreement for the period of June 30, 2023 through December 31, 2029.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Financing Agreement, OpCo Borrower is required to maintain a debt service
reserve of not less than six months of the scheduled principal and interest payments. The letter of credit component of the
OpCo Financing Facility is for the purpose of obtaining letters of credit to satisfy such obligation; at the closing, an
Irrevocable Letter of Credit was issued by Investec Bank plc as the issuing bank in favor of the Collateral Agent for the
benefit of the Lenders in the amount of $6.5 million to satisfy the debt service reserve funding obligation.
Pursuant to the Financing Agreement, within 30 days of the financial close of the Financing Agreement, OpCo Borrower
was required to enter into one or more hedge transactions, with a Lender or an affiliate thereof pursuant to one or more
interest rate agreements, to hedge OpCo Borrower’s interest rate exposure relating to the Term Loan from floating to fixed.
Such hedge transactions are required to be in effect at all times during the entire amortization period and have an aggregate
notional amount subject to the hedge transactions at any time equal to at least 75% and no more than 105% of the aggregate
principal balance of the Term Loan outstanding (taking into account scheduled amortization of the Term Loan).
Upon closing, on May 19, 2023, OpCo Borrower entered into an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement and an ISDA Schedule to
the 2002 Master Agreement with Investec Bank plc as a hedge provider, and an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement and an
ISDA Schedule to the 2002 Master Agreement with Bank of Montreal (Chicago Branch) as a hedge provider. On May 22,
2023, OpCo Borrower executed the related trade confirmations for these interest rate swap agreements with these hedge
providers to protect against adverse price movements in the floating SOFR rate associated with 100% of the aggregate
principal balance of the Term Loan outstanding. Pursuant to the terms of such agreements, OpCo Borrower will pay a
fixed rate of interest of 3.716%. The net interest rate across the Financing Agreement and the swap transaction is 6.366%
in the first four years and 6.866% thereafter. The obligations of OpCo Borrower to the hedge providers under the interest
rate swap agreements are treated as obligations under the Financing Agreement and, accordingly, are secured, on a pari
passu basis, by the same collateral securing the obligations of OpCo Borrower under the Financing Agreement, which
collateral is described below. The Company has not elected hedge accounting treatment and, as a result, the derivative will
be remeasured to fair value quarterly, with the resulting gains/losses recorded to other income/expense. The fair value
adjustments for the years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023 resulted in a loss of $3.1 million and a gain of $3.3 million,
respectively.
111
The Financing Agreement contains certain reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants which are
customary for transactions of this type. Included in the covenants are covenants that: (i) the Yaphank Project Company
obtain ongoing three year extensions of its current gas agreement; (ii) any annual operating expense budget that exceeds
115% of the Base Case Model (as defined in the Financing Agreement) for that year be approved by the Required Lenders
(i.e., Lenders constituting more than 50% of the amounts loaned); (iii) OpCo Borrower maintain a debt service coverage
ratio of not less than 1.20:1.00 (based on the trailing 12 months and tested every six months); and (iv) the Class B Member
is required to exercise its option to purchase the Class A Member’s interest in the Yaphank Tax Equity Partnership during
the six month period following the “Flip Point” as set forth in the limited liability company agreement for the Yaphank
Tax Equity Partnership. The Financing Agreement also contains customary representations and warranties and customary
events of default that cause, or entitle the Lenders to cause, the outstanding loans under the Financing Agreement to
become immediately due and payable.
The Term Loan may be prepaid at any time at the option of OpCo Borrower without premium or penalty other than any
“liquidation costs” if such prepayment occurs other than at the end of an Interest Period. In addition, there are certain
mandatory repayments required under the Financing Agreement, including in connection with any sale or disposition of
all of the Projects or of any of the LIPA Yaphank Project, the Bridgeport Fuel Cell Project or the Pfizer Project. If the
Company disposes of any of the Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant Project, the Santa Rita Jail Project or the
Central CT State University Project, OpCo Borrower is required to prepay an amount of the Term Loan based on the then
stipulated value of the disposed Project.
Simultaneously with OpCo Borrower entering into the Financing Agreement, FCEF (as pledgor), OpCo Borrower and
each of the Bridgeport Project Company, the Pfizer Project Company, the Riverside Project Company, the Santa Rita
Project Company, the CCSU Project Company and the Class B Member, each as a subsidiary grantor party and guarantor,
entered into an Omnibus Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) with Investec Bank plc
as Collateral Agent, pursuant to which, as collateral for the Term Loan Facility, the LC Facility and the hedge agreements
(i) FCEF granted to Collateral Agent a security interest in all of FCEF’s equity interest in OpCo Borrower; (ii) OpCo
Borrower granted to Collateral Agent a security interest in all of OpCo Borrower’s assets consisting of its equity interests
in the Bridgeport Project Company, the Pfizer Project Company, the Riverside Project Company, the Santa Rita Project
Company, the CCSU Project Company and the Class B Member; (iii) each of the Bridgeport Project Company, the Pfizer
Project Company, the Riverside Project Company, the Santa Rita Project Company and the CCSU Project Company
granted to Collateral Agent a security interest in all of each such entity’s assets consisting principally of the respective
generation facilities and project agreements; and (iv) the Class B Member granted to Collateral Agent a security interest
in all of such Class B Member’s assets, consisting principally of its equity interest in the Yaphank Tax Equity Partnership.
Pursuant to the Security Agreement, each of the subsidiary grantor parties jointly and severally guaranteed payment of all
of the obligations secured by the Security Agreement.
Simultaneously with the execution of the Financing Agreement, OpCo Borrower, Investec Bank plc as Collateral Agent
and Administrative Agent and Liberty Bank as Depositary Agent entered into a Depositary Agreement (the “Depositary
Agreement”) pursuant to which OpCo Borrower established certain accounts at Liberty Bank, all of which were pledged
to Collateral Agent as security for the Term Loan Facility, the LC Facility and the hedge agreements, including a Revenue
Account; a Debt Service Reserve Account; a Redemption Account (for prepayments); a Capital Expenditure Reserve
Account; and a Distribution Reserve Account (in each case as defined in the Depositary Agreement). Pursuant to the terms
of the Financing Agreement and the Depositary Agreement, OpCo Borrower may make quarterly distributions to FCEF
and Parent provided that: (i) no Event of Default or Default (in each case as defined in the Financing Agreement) exists
under the OpCo Financing Facility; (ii) all reserve accounts have been funded; (iii) no letter of credit loans or unpaid
drawings are outstanding with regard to any drawn down letter of credit under the LC Facility; (iv) OpCo Borrower has
maintained a greater than 1.20:1.00 debt service coverage ratio for the immediate 12 month period; and (v) no Cash
Diversion Event (i.e., certain events that would adversely impact distributions to the Class B Member in connection with
the LIPA Yaphank Project, as further defined in the Financing Agreement) has occurred. Beginning with the quarter ending
June 2025 and continuing until the quarter ending March 2026, prior to making contributions to the Debt Service Reserve
Account or the Capital Expenditure Reserve Account or having funds available for distribution, out of operating cash flow,
OpCo Borrower is required to make a quarterly payment to the Administrative Agent (on behalf of the Lenders) in the
amount of $675,000 per quarter to be applied to outstanding principal.
112
Groton Back Leverage Financing
On August 18, 2023, FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC (“Groton Holdco Borrower”), a wholly owned subsidiary of
FCEF, which, in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, entered into: (i) a Credit Agreement (the “Groton Senior
Back Leverage Credit Agreement”) with, by and among Liberty Bank, in its capacities as a lender (“Liberty Lender”),
administrative agent (the “Senior Administrative Agent”), and lead arranger, and Amalgamated Bank, in its capacity as a
lender (“Amalgamated Lender” and, collectively with Liberty Lender, the “Groton Senior Back Leverage Lenders”), for
a term loan facility in an amount not to exceed an aggregate of $12.0 million to be provided 50% by Liberty Lender and
50% by Amalgamated Lender (such facility, the “Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility,” each such term loan, a
“Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan” and such term loans together, the “Groton Senior Back Leverage Loans”); and (ii)
a Credit Agreement (the “Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement”) with Connecticut Green Bank, as
administrative agent (the “Subordinated Administrative Agent”) and lender (“Groton Subordinated Back Leverage
Lender”), for a term loan facility in an amount not to exceed $8.0 million (such facility, the “Groton Subordinated Back
Leverage Loan Facility” and such term loan, the “Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan”). The Groton Senior Back
Leverage Lenders and the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Lender are referred to collectively as the “Groton Back
Leverage Lenders.”
Groton Holdco Borrower’s obligations under the Groton Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement and the Groton
Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on all of Groton Holdco Borrower’s assets, consisting
principally of its Class B Member Interests (the “Class B Interests”) in Groton Station Fuel Cell Holdco, LLC (the “Groton
Tax Equity Holdco”). Class A Membership Interests (the “Class A Interests”) in the Groton Tax Equity Holdco are held
by East West Bank. Groton Holdco Borrower is also the Managing Member of the Groton Tax Equity Holdco. The
Groton Tax Equity Holdco’s primary asset is ownership of all of the outstanding equity interests in Groton Station Fuel
Cell, LLC (the “Groton Project Company”). The Groton Project Company, in turn, is the owner of the fuel cell power
plant at the U.S. Navy Submarine Base New London located in Groton, Connecticut (the “Groton Project”). As additional
context concerning the relationship among the parties with respect to the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and
the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility more fully described below, on December 16, 2022, the Groton
Project Company and Parent entered into an Amended and Restated Power Purchase Agreement (the “Groton Amended
and Restated PPA”) with Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative (“CMEEC”), pursuant to which the Groton
Project Company agreed to sell to CMEEC, and CMEEC agreed to purchase from the Groton Project Company, all of
the electricity output produced by the Groton Project pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Groton Amended and
Restated PPA.
At the closing (the “Groton Closing”) of each of the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Groton
Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility, which occurred simultaneously on August 18, 2023 (the “Groton Closing
Date”), the entire amount of each of the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility and the Groton Subordinated Back
Leverage Loan Facility was drawn down in the aggregate amount of $20.0 million. After payment of fees and transaction
costs (including fees to the Groton Back Leverage Lenders and legal costs) of approximately $0.4 million in the aggregate,
the remaining proceeds of approximately $19.6 million were used as follows: (i) approximately $1.7 million was used to
fund debt service reserve accounts (“DSCR Reserve Accounts”) for the Groton Senior Back Leverage Lenders in equal
amounts of approximately $0.83 million for Liberty Lender and approximately $0.83 million for Amalgamated Lender;
(ii) approximately $6.5 million was used to fund operations and maintenance and module replacement reserve accounts
for the Groton Senior Back Leverage Lenders in equal amounts of approximately $3.25 million for Liberty Lender and
approximately $3.25 million for Amalgamated Lender; (iii) approximately $0.3 million was used to fund a DSCR Reserve
Account for the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Lender; and (iv) the remaining amount of approximately $11.1
million was released to Parent from the Groton Back Leverage Lenders. As discussed in additional detail below,
simultaneous with the Groton Closing, a portion of the proceeds were used to: (a) make Output Shortfall Payments (which
are cash payments required to be made by the Groton Project Company in the event that the Groton Project produces
electricity in any year less than the minimum required amount for such year) totaling approximately $1.3 million, which
were deposited into a payment reserve account, and (b) pay approximately $3.0 million to Connecticut Green Bank, which
represented payment, in full, of all outstanding obligations under Parent’s loan agreement with Connecticut Green Bank.
After taking into account such Output Shortfall Payments and such payment to Connecticut Green Bank, approximately
$6.8 million was classified as unrestricted cash on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The portion of the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan provided by Liberty Lender will accrue interest on the unpaid
principal amount calculated from the date of such Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan until the maturity date at a rate per
annum equal to 6.75%. The portion of the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan provided by Amalgamated Lender will
113
accrue interest on the unpaid principal amount calculated from the date of such Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan until
the maturity date thereof at 6.07% during all times at which a “Carbon Offset Event” is not continuing and 7.32% at all
times at which a “Carbon Offset Event” has occurred and is continuing. A “Carbon Offset Event” is deemed to occur if
Groton Holdco Borrower, Parent or any direct or indirect subsidiary thereof does not purchase carbon offsets from an
Acceptable Carbon Offset Provider (as defined below) each fiscal year in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the Annual
Carbon Offset Requirement for such fiscal year, which is derived based on a formula equal to the outstanding balance of
the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan provided by Amalgamated Lender multiplied by the Groton Project’s annual
carbon emissions for such year and divided by the total project costs of the Groton Project, and (ii) the Annual Carbon
Offset Cap for such fiscal year, which is $12.66 multiplied by the Annual Carbon Offset Requirement and divided by the
Carbon Offset Price for such fiscal year. The “Carbon Offset Price” means the price, per metric ton of carbon dioxide, of
the carbon offsets available for purchase from an Acceptable Carbon Offset Provider. An “Acceptable Carbon Offset
Provider” is either Climate Vault or any other seller of carbon offsets acceptable to Amalgamated Lender.
Quarterly principal amortization and interest payments are required to be made by Groton Holdco Borrower on the Groton
Senior Back Leverage Loans based on a ten-year amortization period. The Groton Senior Back Leverage Loans have a
seven-year term, maturing on August 18, 2030, at which time all outstanding principal is due.
The Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan will accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to 8% for the period of time
prior to the “Step Down Date” and, after the “Step Down Date,” at the lesser of 8% or the interest rate on a 10 year U.S.
Treasury Note plus 275 basis points (subject to a minimum floor of 5% per annum). The “Step Down Date” is the date on
which both of the following events have occurred: Groton Holdco Borrower has purchased East West Bank’s Class A
Interests in the Groton Tax Equity Holdco and the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loans have been repaid in full. Interest
is payable each quarter based on an agreed upon schedule.
Pursuant to the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility, during the “Groton Interest Only Period” (as defined
below), Groton Holdco Borrower is required to make quarterly payments of principal in amounts equal to 50% of excess
cash flow available to Groton Holdco Borrower. For purposes of the foregoing, excess cash flow is all excess cash flow
of Groton Holdco Borrower after the payment of required principal and interest on the Groton Senior Back Leverage
Loans, required deposits in the various reserve accounts, the payment of interest on the Groton Subordinated Back
Leverage Loan and payment of Groton Holdco Borrower’s operating expenses. Following the end of the “Groton Interest
Only Period,” principal and interest payments are required to be made quarterly in quarterly level payments (“mortgage
style”) of principal and interest until the maturity date, which is the first to occur of 20 years following the Groton Project’s
commercial operations date and termination of the Groton Amended and Restated PPA. The maturity date of the Groton
Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility is currently contemplated to be September 30, 2038. The “Groton Interest
Only Period” is the period beginning on the Groton Closing Date and ending the first to occur of (i) eighty-four months
after the Groton Closing Date; or (ii) the date the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility has been fully repaid.
Each of the Groton Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement and the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Credit
Agreement contains certain reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants which are customary for
transactions of this type. Included in the covenants are covenants that: (i) Groton Holdco Borrower maintain a “Senior”
debt service coverage ratio (which is computed taking into account debt service obligations on the Groton Senior Back
Leverage Loans) of not less than 1.20:1.00 (based on the trailing 12 months and tested every quarter) and a “Total” debt
service coverage ratio (which is computed taking into account debt service obligations on both the Groton Senior Back
Leverage Loans and the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan) of not less than 1.10:1.00 (based on the trailing 12
months and tested on a quarterly basis); (ii) Groton Holdco Borrower may make distributions or dividends only if the
foregoing debt to equity coverage ratios have been satisfied and Groton Holdco Borrower is not in default under any
provisions of either the Groton Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement or the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Credit
Agreement, including having made all required deposits into reserve accounts; (iii) Groton Holdco Borrower is required
to exercise its right under the Groton Tax Equity Holdco limited liability company agreement to acquire the Class A
Interests from East West Bank during the ninety day period beginning on the “Flip Point” (which, pursuant to the Groton
Tax Equity Holdco limited liability company agreement, is the date on which the holder of Class A Interests has realized
a certain return on investment and, accordingly, Groton Holdco Borrower, as holder of the Class B Interests, has the right
to purchase the Class A Interests); and (iv) the consent of the Senior Administrative Agent is required prior to Groton
Holdco Borrower’s taking certain material actions under the Groton Tax Equity Holdco limited liability company
agreement. Each of the Groton Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement and the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage
Credit Agreement also contains customary representations and warranties and customary events of default that cause, or
entitle the Groton Back Leverage Lenders to cause, the outstanding loans to become immediately due and payable. In
114
addition to customary events of default for transactions of this kind, the events of default include if a Change of Control
occurs (meaning Parent no longer directly or indirectly owns Groton Holdco Borrower), a cross default (meaning that a
default under the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility shall be deemed a default under the Groton Subordinated
Back Leverage Loan Facility and vice versa) or if CMEEC should become insolvent, is in bankruptcy or commits a
specified number of payment defaults with regard to its payment obligations to the Groton Project Company.
The Groton Senior Back Leverage Loans may be prepaid at any time at the option of Groton Holdco Borrower provided
that (i) each prepayment on or prior to the second anniversary of the Groton Closing Date shall require a prepayment fee
of 3% of the principal amount being prepaid; (ii) each prepayment after the second anniversary of the Groton Closing Date
but on or prior to the fourth anniversary of the Groton Closing Date shall require a prepayment fee of 2% of the principal
amount being prepaid; and (iii) each prepayment after the fourth anniversary of the Groton Closing Date but on or prior to
the seventh anniversary of the Groton Closing Date shall require a prepayment fee of 1% of the principal amount being
prepaid. The Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty.
Finance obligations for sale-leaseback agreements
Several of the Company’s project subsidiaries previously entered into sale-leaseback agreements with PNC and Crestmark
for commissioned projects where the Company had entered into a PPA with the site host/end-user of produced power. The
Company did not recognize as revenue any of the proceeds received from the lessor that contractually constitute payments
to acquire the assets subject to these arrangements. Instead, the sale proceeds received were accounted for as finance
obligations. The outstanding finance obligation balance as of both October 31, 2024 and 2023 was $18.8 million. The
outstanding finance obligation for the remaining leases as of October 31, 2024 includes $10.5 million in excess of future
required payments which represents imputed interest, not including amounts for the potential repurchase price of the
project assets which is based on fair value. The sale-leaseback arrangements with Crestmark include a purchase right for
the greater of fair market value or 31% of the purchase price.
State of Connecticut Loan
In November 2015, the Company closed on a definitive Assistance Agreement with the State of Connecticut (the
“Assistance Agreement”) and received a disbursement of $10.0 million, which was used for the first phase of the expansion
of the Company’s Torrington, Connecticut manufacturing facility. In conjunction with this financing, the Company entered
into a $10.0 million promissory note and related security agreements securing the loan with equipment liens and a mortgage
on its Danbury, Connecticut location. Interest accrues at a fixed interest rate of 2.0%, and the loan is repayable over 15
years from the date of the first advance, which occurred in November of 2015. Principal payments were deferred for four
years from disbursement and began on December 1, 2019. Under the Assistance Agreement, the Company was eligible
for up to $5.0 million in loan forgiveness if the Company created 165 full-time positions and retained 538 full-time
positions for two consecutive years (as amended from time to time, the “Employment Obligation”) as measured on
October 28, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Target Date”). The Assistance Agreement was subsequently
amended in April 2017 to extend the Target Date by two years to October 28, 2019.
In January 2019, the Company and the State of Connecticut entered into a Second Amendment to the Assistance
Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment extended the Target Date to October 31, 2022 and
amended the Employment Obligation to require the Company to continuously maintain a minimum of 538 full-time
positions for 24 consecutive months. If the Company met the Employment Obligation, as modified by the Second
Amendment, and created an additional 91 full-time positions, the Company would have received a credit in the amount of
$2.0 million to be applied against the outstanding balance of the loan. The Second Amendment deleted and canceled the
provisions of the Assistance Agreement related to the second phase of the expansion project and the loans related thereto,
but the Company had not drawn any funds or received any disbursements under those provisions.
In April 2023, the Company signed a Third Amendment to the Assistance Agreement (the “Third Amendment”). The
Third Amendment was approved by the State of Connecticut Office of Attorney General on May 18, 2023, and the State
of Connecticut Office of Attorney General released, and the Company received, the countersigned Third Amendment on
May 24, 2023, at which time the Third Amendment became effective. The Third Amendment further extended the Target
Date to October 31, 2024 and amended the Employment Obligation to require the Company to retain 538 full-time
positions in Connecticut on or before October 31, 2024 and to maintain such positions for 24 consecutive months. The 24
consecutive month period ending on or before the Target Date (as extended by the Third Amendment) that yields the
highest annual average positions will be used to determine compliance with the amended Employment Obligation,
115
provided that no portion of such 24 consecutive months may begin before the date of the Third Amendment. The Third
Amendment also requires the Company to furnish a job audit (the “Job Audit”) to the Commissioner of Economic and
Community Development (the “Commissioner”) no later than 90 days following the 24-month period described above.
If, as a result of the Job Audit, the Commissioner determines that the Company has failed to meet the Employment
Obligation (as amended by the Third Amendment), the Company will be required to immediately repay a penalty of
$14,225.00 per each full-time employment position below the amended Employment Obligation. The amount repaid will
be applied first to any outstanding fees, penalties or interest due, and then against the outstanding balance of the loan.
If, as a result of the Job Audit, the Commissioner were to determine that the Company had met the amended Employment
Obligation and had created an additional 91 full-time employment positions, for a total of 629 full-time employees, the
Company would be eligible to receive a credit in the amount of $2.0 million, which would be applied against the then-
outstanding principal balance of the loan. Upon application of such credit, the Commissioner would recalculate the
monthly payments of principal and interest such that such monthly payments would amortize the then remaining principal
balance over the remaining term of loan. However, based on the Company’s headcount as of October 31, 2024, it did not
meet the amended Employment Obligation and will not receive this credit.
A Job Audit will be performed within 90 days of the Target Date of October 31, 2024. Because the Company did not meet
the amended Employment Obligation, an accelerated payment penalty will be assessed in an amount equal to $14,225.00
multiplied by the number of full-time employment positions below the number of positions required by the amended
Employment Obligation. Such penalty will be immediately payable upon the determination by the Commissioner that the
Company has failed to meet the amended Employment Obligation and will be applied first to accelerate the payment of
any outstanding fees, penalties or interest due and then to accelerate the payment of the outstanding principal balance of
the loan. The Company estimates that it had an average of 389 employees over the applicable 24 consecutive month period.
As a result, $2.1 million of the loan has been reclassified to current, which represents the expected accelerated payment
penalty amount. As of October 31, 2024, the Company had not been formally assessed a penalty but since there are no
fees, penalties or interest due, any accelerated payment penalty assessed will be applied to the outstanding principal balance
of the loan and not result in any charges to the Statement of Operations.
In April of 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the State of Connecticut agreed to defer three months of principal
and interest payments under the Assistance Agreement, beginning with the May 2020 payment. These deferred payments
will be added at the end of the loan, thus extending out the maturity date by three months.
Deferred Finance Costs
As of October 31, 2024, deferred finance costs related primarily to sale-leaseback transactions entered into with Crestmark,
which are being amortized over the 10-year terms of the lease agreements, and payments under the EXIM Financing, the
Derby Back Leverage Financing, the OpCo Financing Facility, the Groton Senior Back Leverage Loan Facility, and the
Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Loan Facility, which are being amortized using the effective interest rate method.
Any deferred finance costs remaining during fiscal year 2023 which related to the debt payoffs mentioned above were
written off as a loss on extinguishment of finance obligations and debt.
Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity and Warrant Liabilities
Increase in Authorized Shares
The Company obtained stockholder approval on October 10, 2023 at a Special Meeting of Stockholders to increase the
number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended. The Company’s stockholders approved a 500.0 million increase in the number of authorized shares of
common stock. Accordingly, on October 11, 2023, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company with the Delaware Secretary of State increasing the total number of authorized shares of
common stock from 500.0 million to 1.0 billion shares.
2022 Open Market Sale Agreement and Amended Sales Agreement
On July 12, 2022, the Company entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement (the “2022 Sales Agreement”) with Jefferies
LLC, B. Riley Securities, Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Canaccord
Genuity LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Loop Capital Markets LLC (each, an
“Agent” and together, the “Agents”) with respect to an at the market offering program under which the Company may,
116
from time to time, offer and sell up to 3.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the 2022 Sales
Agreement, the Company was required to pay and did pay each Agent a commission equal to 2.0% of the gross proceeds
from each sale of shares made by such Agent under the 2022 Sales Agreement.
On April 10, 2024, the Company and the Agents entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the 2022 Sales
Agreement (the 2022 Sales Agreement as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended Sales Agreement”), with respect
to an at the market offering program under which the Company may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of the
Company’s common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million (exclusive of any amounts previously
sold under the 2022 Sales Agreement prior to its amendment). Pursuant to the Amended Sales Agreement, the Company
is required to pay and has paid each Agent a commission equal to 2.0% of the gross proceeds from each sale of shares
made by such Agent under the Amended Sales Agreement.
From the date of the Amended Sales Agreement through October 31, 2024, approximately 5.3 million shares of the
Company’s common stock were sold under the Amended Sales Agreement at an average sale price of $17.93 per share,
resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $95.1 million before deducting sales commissions and fees, and net proceeds
to the Company of approximately $92.6 million after deducting sales commissions totaling approximately $1.9 million
and fees totaling approximately $0.6 million.
During the year ended October 31, 2023, approximately 1.5 million shares were sold under the 2022 Sales Agreement at
an average sale price of $67.49 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $99.7 million before deducting
sales commissions and fees, and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $97.4 million after deducting sales
commissions and fees totaling approximately $2.3 million.
As of October 31, 2024, approximately $204.9 million of shares remained available for sale under the Amended Sales
Agreement.
On December 27, 2024, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Amended Sales Agreement, which removes
certain representations and warranties relating to the Company’s status as a well-known seasoned issuer.
Note 14. Redeemable Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 250,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, in one or more
series, of which 105,875 shares were designated as 5% Series B Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
(referred to herein as Series B Preferred Stock) in March 2005.
Redeemable Series B Preferred Stock
The Company has designated 105,875 shares of its authorized preferred stock as Series B Preferred Stock (liquidation
preference $1,000.00 per share). As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, there were 64,020 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
issued and outstanding, with a carrying value of $59.9 million. The following is a summary of certain terms of the Series B
Preferred Stock.
Ranking. Shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock rank with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the
Company’s liquidation, winding up or dissolution:
x
senior to shares of the Company’s common stock;
x
junior to the Company’s debt obligations; and
x
effectively junior to the Company’s subsidiaries’ (i) existing and future liabilities and (ii) capital stock held
by others.
Dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock pays cumulative annual dividends of $50.00 per share, which are payable
quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15. Dividends accumulate and are cumulative
from the date of original issuance. Unpaid accumulated dividends do not bear interest.
117
The dividend rate is subject to upward adjustment as set forth in the Amended Certificate of Designation for the Series B
Preferred Stock (the “Series B Certificate of Designation”) if the Company fails to pay, or to set apart funds to pay, any
quarterly dividend on the Series B Preferred Stock.
No dividends or other distributions may be paid or set apart for payment on the Company’s common stock (other than a
dividend payable solely in shares of a like or junior ranking), nor may any stock junior to or on parity with the Series B
Preferred Stock be redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired for any consideration (or any money paid to or made
DYDLODEOHIRUDVLQNLQJIXQGIRUVXFKVWRFN E\WKH&RPSDQ\RURQLWVEHKDOIௗ H[FHSWE\FRQYHUVLRQLQWRRUH[FKDQJHIRU
shares of a like or junior ranking), unless all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock have been
paid or funds or shares of common stock have been set aside for payment of such accumulated and unpaid dividends.
The dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock will be paid in cash, unless a registered holder elects (pursuant to the
procedures set forth in the Series B Certificate of Designation) to receive such dividends in shares of the Company’s
common stock. Any such shares of common stock paid in lieu of cash dividends will be treated as restricted securities
and will not be transferable by the recipient thereof except pursuant to an effective registration statement or pursuant
to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).
Dividends of $3.2 million were paid in cash during each of the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024 and 2023. Cumulative
declared and unpaid dividends as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 were $0.8 million.
Liquidation. The holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, in the event that the Company is liquidated,
dissolved or wound up, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, $1,000.00 per share plus all accumulated and unpaid
dividends up to but excluding the date of such liquidation, dissolution, or winding up (the “Liquidation Preference”). Until
the holders of Series B Preferred Stock receive the Liquidation Preference with respect to their shares of Series B Preferred
Stock in full, no payment will be made on any junior shares, including shares of the Company’s common stock. After the
Liquidation Preference is paid in full, holders of the Series B Preferred Stock will not be entitled to receive any further
distribution of the Company’s assets. (For the avoidance of doubt, neither the voluntary sale of all or substantially all of
the Company’s assets, nor a merger involving the Company, shall be deemed to be a voluntary or involuntary liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Company.) As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, the issued and outstanding shares of
Series B Preferred Stock had an aggregate Liquidation Preference of $64.0 million.
Conversion Rights. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock may be converted at any time, at the option of the holder, into
0.0197 shares of the Company’s common stock (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $50,760.00 per share)
plus cash in lieu of fractional shares. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events,
as described in the Series B Certificate of Designation. The conversion rate is not adjusted for accumulated and unpaid
dividends. If converted, holders of Series B Preferred Stock do not receive a cash payment for all accumulated and unpaid
dividends; rather, all accumulated and unpaid dividends are canceled.
The Company may, at its option, cause shares of Series B Preferred Stock to be automatically converted into that number
of shares of its common stock that are issuable at the then-prevailing conversion rate. The Company may exercise its
conversion right only if the closing price of its common stock exceeds 150% of the then-prevailing conversion price
($50,760.00 per share as of October 31, 2024) for 20 trading days during any consecutive 30 trading day period, as
described in the Series B Certificate of Designation.
If the holders of Series B Preferred Stock elect to convert their shares in connection with certain “fundamental changes”
(as defined in the Series B Certificate of Designation and described below), the Company will in certain circumstances
increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares of common stock upon conversion or, in lieu thereof, the
Company may in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and related conversion obligation so that shares
of Series B Preferred Stock are converted into shares of the acquiring or surviving company, in each case as described in
the Series B Certificate of Designation.
The adjustment of the conversion price is to prevent dilution of the interests of the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock
from certain dilutive transactions with holders of the Company’s common stock.
Redemption. The Company does not have the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock. However, holders of the
Series B Preferred Stock can require the Company to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Series B Preferred Stock at
a redemption price equal to the Liquidation Preference of the shares to be redeemed in the case of a “fundamental change”
118
(as further described in the Series B Certificate of Designation). A fundamental change will be deemed to have occurred
if any of the following occurs:
x
any “person” or “group” is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the total
voting power of all classes of the Company’s capital stock then outstanding and normally entitled to vote in
the election of directors;
x
during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the
board of directors of the Company (together with any new directors whose election to the Company’s board
of directors or whose nomination for election by the stockholders was approved by a vote of 66 2/3% of the
Company’s directors then still in office who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose
election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority
of the directors of the Company then in office;
x
the termination of trading of the Company’s common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market and the common
stock is not approved for trading or quoted on any other U.S. securities exchange or established over-the-
counter trading market in the U.S.; or
x
the Company (i) consolidates with or merges with or into another person or another person merges with or
into the Company or (ii) sells, assigns, transfers, leases, conveys or otherwise disposes of all or substantially
all of the assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to another person and, in the
case of any such merger or consolidation described in clause (i), the securities that are outstanding immediately
prior to such transaction (and which represent 100% of the aggregate voting power of the Company’s voting
stock) are changed into or exchanged for cash, securities or property, unless pursuant to the transaction such
securities are changed into or exchanged for securities of the surviving person that represent, immediately
after such transaction, at least a majority of the aggregate voting power of the voting stock of the surviving
person.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, holders of shares of the Series B Preferred Stock will not have the right to require the
Company to redeem their shares if:
x
the last reported sale price of shares of the Company’s common stock for any five trading days within the 10
consecutive trading days ending immediately before the later of the fundamental change or its announcement
equaled or exceeded 105% of the conversion price of the Series B Preferred Stock immediately before the
fundamental change or announcement;
x
at least 90% of the consideration (excluding cash payments for fractional shares and in respect of dissenters’
appraisal rights) in the transaction or transactions constituting the fundamental change consists of shares of
capital stock traded on a U.S. national securities exchange or quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market, or which
will be so traded or quoted when issued or exchanged in connection with a fundamental change, and as a result
of the transaction or transactions, shares of Series B Preferred Stock become convertible into such publicly
traded securities; or
x
in the case of a merger or consolidation constituting a fundamental change (as described in the fourth bullet
above), the transaction is affected solely to change the Company’s jurisdiction of incorporation.
Moreover, the Company will not be required to redeem any Series B Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of a fundamental
change if a third party makes an offer to purchase the Series B Preferred Stock in the manner, at the price, at the times and
otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth above and such third party purchases all shares of Series B
Preferred Stock validly tendered and not withdrawn.
The Company may, at its option, elect to pay the redemption price in cash, in shares of the Company’s common stock
valued at a discount of 5% from the market price of shares of the Company’s common stock, or in any combination thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may only pay such redemption price in shares of the Company’s common
stock that are registered under the Securities Act and eligible for immediate sale in the public market by non-affiliates of
the Company.
119
Voting Rights. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock currently have no voting rights; however, holders may receive certain
voting rights, as described in the Series B Certificate of Designation, if (a) dividends on any shares of Series B Preferred
Stock, or any other class or series of stock ranking on parity with the Series B Preferred Stock with respect to the payment
of dividends, shall be in arrears for dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, containing in the aggregate a number
of days equivalent to six calendar quarters or (b) the Company fails to pay the redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid
dividends, if any, on the redemption date for shares of Series B Preferred Stock following a fundamental change. In each
such event, the holders of Series B Preferred Stock (voting separately as a class with all other classes or series of stock
ranking on parity with the Series B Preferred Stock with respect to the payment of dividends and upon which like voting
rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to elect two directors to the Company’s board of directors
in addition to those directors already serving on the Company’s board of directors at such time (the “Series B Directors”),
at the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders (or at a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders called
for such purpose, whichever is earlier). The right to elect the Series B Directors will continue for each subsequent annual
meeting of the Company’s stockholders until all dividends accumulated on the shares of Series B Preferred Stock have
been fully paid or set aside for payment or the Company pays in full or sets aside for payment such redemption price, plus
accrued but unpaid dividends, if any, on the redemption date for the shares of Series B Preferred Stock following a
fundamental change. The term of office of any Series B Directors will terminate immediately upon the termination of the
right of holders of Series B Preferred Stock to elect such Series B Directors, as described in this paragraph. Each holder
of Series B Preferred Stock will have one vote for each share of Series B Preferred Stock held in the election of Series B
Directors. The Company previously failed to make timely payment of the accrued dividends on the Series B Preferred
Stock with respect to the May 15, 2019 and August 15, 2019 dividend payment dates. Such amounts were fully paid on or
about November 15, 2019.
So long as any shares of Series B Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company will not, without the consent of the
holders of at least two-thirds of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at the time (voting separately as a class
with all other series of preferred stock, if any, on parity with the Series B Preferred Stock upon which like voting rights
have been conferred and are exercisable) issue or increase the authorized amount of any class or series of shares ranking
senior to the outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation. In addition, the
Company will not, subject to certain conditions, amend, alter or repeal provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, as
amended, including the Series B Certificate of Designation, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, so as to
adversely amend, alter or affect any power, preference or special right of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred
Stock or the holders thereof without the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the issued and outstanding shares
of Series B Preferred Stock. The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation in October 2023 did not trigger this
provision.
Note 15. Segment Information
We are engaged in the development, design, production, construction, and servicing of high temperature fuel cells for
clean electric power generation. Critical to the success of our business is, among other things, our research and
development efforts, both through customer-sponsored projects and Company-sponsored projects. The research and
development activities are viewed as another product line that contributes to the development, design, production and sale
of fuel cell products, however, it is not considered a separate operating segment. The chief operating decision maker does
not review and assess financial information at a discrete enough level to be able to assess performance of research and
development activities as if they operated as a standalone business segment, therefore, the Company has identified one
business segment: fuel cell power plant production and research.
Revenues, by geographic location (based on the customer’s ordering location) for the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023
and 2022 were as follows (in thousands):
2024
2023
2022
United States
$ 86,962
$ 63,289
$ 60,290
South Korea
22,836
58,432
68,341
Europe
1,919
1,673
1,853
Canada
415
—
—
Total
$ 112,132
$ 123,394
$ 130,484
Long-lived assets located outside of the United States as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 are not significant individually or
in the aggregate.
120
Note 16. Benefit Plans
We have stockholder approved equity incentive plans, a stockholder approved Employee Stock Purchase Plan and an
employee tax-deferred savings plan, which are described in more detail below.
Fourth Amended and Restated 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan
At the Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 4, 2024 (the “2024 Annual Meeting”), the
Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the FuelCell Energy, Inc. Third Amended and
Restated 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as so amended and restated, the “Fourth Amended and Restated Incentive Plan”),
which had previously been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), subject to stockholder approval.
The purpose of the amendment and restatement of the Third Amended and Restated 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan was to
authorize the Company to issue up to 833,333 additional shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to awards under
the Fourth Amended and Restated Incentive Plan.
Following the approval of the amendment and restatement (and therefore the Fourth Amended and Restated Incentive
Plan) by the Company’s stockholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting, the Fourth Amended and Restated Incentive Plan
provides the Company with the authority to issue a total of 1,444,444 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Fourth
Amended and Restated Incentive Plan authorizes grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted
stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), shares, performance shares, performance units, incentive awards
and dividend equivalent units to officers, other employees, directors, consultants and advisors. Up to 61,111 shares of the
Company’s common stock may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options. Stock options, RSAs, RSUs
and SARs have restrictions as to transferability. Stock option exercise prices are fixed by the Board but shall not be less
than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant. SARs may be granted in conjunction with stock
options. The Board or the administrator of the Fourth Amended and Restated Incentive Plan may terminate the Fourth
Amended and Restated Incentive Plan at any time. No award may be granted under the Fourth Amended and Restated
Plan after the tenth anniversary of the approval of the Fourth Amended and Restated Plan by stockholders at the 2024
Annual Meeting.
Of the 1,444,444 shares of the Company’s common stock authorized to be issued under the Fourth Amended and Restated
Incentive Plan as of October 31, 2024, 754,518 remained available for grant as of October 31, 2024. Of the shares
remaining available for grant, the Company had reserved, for potential future grant, up to 146,397 performance stock units
if maximum performance is achieved.
Amended and Restated 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
At the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2023 Annual Meeting”), the Company’s stockholders approved the
amendment and restatement of the FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as so amended and restated,
the “Amended and Restated ESPP”), which had previously been approved by the Board, subject to stockholder approval.
The purpose of the amendment and restatement of the 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan was to authorize the Company
to issue up to 16,666 additional shares of the Company’s common stock under the Amended and Restated ESPP.
Following the approval of the amendment and restatement (and therefore the Amended and Restated ESPP) by the
Company’s stockholders at the 2023 Annual Meeting, the Amended and Restated ESPP provided the Company with the
authority to issue a total of 18,055 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Amended and Restated ESPP also
increased the limit on the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that any individual participant may purchase
during an offering period to 33 shares.
The Amended and Restated ESPP, which is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, allows the Company to provide eligible employees of the Company and of certain designated
subsidiaries with the opportunity to voluntarily participate in the Amended and Restated ESPP, enabling such participants
to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount to market price at the time of such purchase. The Board
may, in its sole discretion, terminate the Amended and Restated ESPP at any time. If the Board does not earlier terminate
the Amended and Restated ESPP, the Amended and Restated ESPP will terminate on the date on which all shares of
common stock available for issuance have been sold pursuant to purchase rights exercised under the Amended and Restated
ESPP.
121
Under the Amended and Restated ESPP, eligible employees have the right to purchase shares of common stock at the
lesser of (i) 85% of the last reported sale price of our common stock on the first business day of the offering period, or
(ii) 85% of the last reported sale price of the common stock on the last business day of the offering period, in either case
rounded up to avoid impermissible trading fractions. Shares issued pursuant to the ESPP contain a legend restricting the
transfer or sale of such common stock for a period of 0.5 year after the date of purchase.
The ESPP activity for the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was de minimis.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Company’s Board periodically approves Long Term Incentive Plans which include performance-based awards tied to
the Company’s common stock price as well as time-vesting awards. None of the awards granted as part of Long-Term
Incentive Plans include any dividend equivalent or other stockholder rights. To the extent the awards are earned, they may
be settled in shares or cash of an equivalent value at the Company’s option. These plans are further described below.
Fiscal Year 2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards:
On December 11, 2023, the Compensation Committee of the Board (now known as the Compensation and Leadership
Development Committee) (the “Compensation Committee”) approved the specific components of, and the payout
calibration for, certain awards to be made under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (which is a sub-plan consisting
of awards made under the Company’s 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “2018 Incentive Plan”))
for fiscal year 2024. The participants in the Plan for fiscal year 2024 are members of senior management. The Plan consists
of two award components for fiscal year 2024:
1)
Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) Performance Share Units (“PSU”). The PSUs granted during the year
ended October 31, 2024 will be earned over the performance period ending on October 31, 2026, but will remain
subject to a continued service-based vesting requirement until the third anniversary of the date of grant. The
performance measure for the relative TSR PSUs is the TSR of the Company relative to the TSR of the Russell
2000 from November 1, 2023 through October 31, 2026. The Compensation Committee of the Board established
the performance assessment criteria for the relative TSR PSUs as the TSR of the Company relative to the TSR of
the Russell 2000, with the award calibration being 100% plus or minus 0.5x the difference between the
Company’s TSR and the Russell 2000 Index composite TSR. The award is capped at 200% of the target number
of PSUs, and the award is further capped at 100% of the target number of PSUs if the Company’s absolute TSR
over the performance period is negative. The Company’s TSR is calculated by subtracting the Company’s
beginning stock price (defined as the average closing price of the Company’s common stock over the 20
consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2023) from the ending stock price (defined as the average closing
price of the Company’s common stock over the 20 consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2026), adding
any dividends during the period, and then dividing the result by the Company’s beginning stock price. Given that
the performance period is still open, the Company has reserved shares equal to 200% of the target number of
PSUs, subject to performance during the remaining performance period as well as vesting based on continued
service until December 11, 2026 (the third anniversary of the grant date).
2)
Time-vesting RSUs. The time-vesting RSUs granted during the year ended October 31, 2024 will vest at a rate
of one-third of the total number of RSUs on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.
Fiscal Year 2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan:
On December 5, 2022, the Board approved a Long-Term Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2023 (the “FY 2023 LTI Plan”) as
a sub-plan consisting of awards made under the 2018 Incentive Plan. The participants in the FY 2023 LTI Plan are
members of senior management. The FY 2023 LTI Plan consists of two award components:
1)
Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) Performance Share Units (“PSU”). The PSUs granted during the year
ended October 31, 2023 will be earned over the performance period ending on October 31, 2025, but will remain
subject to a continued service-based vesting requirement until the third anniversary of the date of grant. The
performance measure for the relative TSR PSUs is the TSR of the Company relative to the TSR of the Russell
2000 from November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025. The Compensation Committee of the Board established
the performance assessment criteria for the relative TSR PSUs as the TSR of the Company relative to the TSR of
122
the Russell 2000, with the award calibration being 100% plus or minus 0.5x the difference between the
Company’s TSR and the Russell 2000 Index composite TSR. The award is capped at 200% of the target number
of PSUs, and the award is further capped at 100% of the target number of PSUs if the Company’s absolute TSR
over the performance period is negative. The Company’s TSR is calculated by subtracting the Company’s
beginning stock price (defined as the average closing price of the Company’s common stock over the 60
consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2022) from the ending stock price (defined as the average closing
price of the Company’s common stock over the 60 consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2025), adding
any dividends during the period, and then dividing the result by the Company’s beginning stock price. Given that
the performance period is still open, the Company has reserved shares equal to 200% of the target number of
PSUs, subject to performance during the remaining performance period as well as vesting based on continued
service until December 5, 2025 (the third anniversary of the grant date).
2)
Time-vesting RSUs. The time-vesting RSUs granted during the year ended October 31, 2023 will vest at a rate
of one-third of the total number of RSUs on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.
Fiscal Year 2022 Long Term Incentive Plan:
On December 10, 2021, the Board approved a Long-Term Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2022 (the “FY 2022 LTI Plan”)
as a sub-plan consisting of awards made under the 2018 Incentive Plan. The participants in the FY 2022 LTI Plan are
members of senior management. The FY 2022 LTI Plan consists of two award components:
1)
Relative TSR PSU awards. The PSUs granted during the year ended October 31, 2022 were earned over the
performance period ended on October 31, 2024, but remained subject to a continued service-based vesting
requirement until the third anniversary of the date of grant. The performance measure for the relative TSR
performance units was the TSR of the Company relative to the TSR of the Russell 2000 from November 1, 2021
through October 31, 2024. The Compensation Committee established the performance assessment criteria for the
relative TSR PSUs as the TSR of the Company relative to the TSR of the Russell 2000, with the award calibration
being 100% plus or minus 0.5x the difference between the Company’s TSR and the Russell 2000 Index composite
TSR. The award was capped at 200% of the target number of PSUs, and the award was further capped at 100%
of the target number of PSUs if the Company’s absolute TSR over the performance period was negative. The
Company’s TSR was calculated by subtracting the Company’s beginning stock price (defined as the average
closing price of the Company’s common stock over the 20 consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2021)
from the ending stock price (defined as the average closing price of the Company’s common stock over the 20
consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2024), adding any dividends during the period, and then dividing
the result by the Company’s beginning stock price. On November 17, 2024, based on the calculations described
above, the Compensation Committee certified awards at 52.665% of the target amount, subject to continued
service until December 10, 2024 (the third anniversary of the grant date).
2)
Time-vesting restricted stock units. The time-vesting RSUs granted during the year ended October 31, 2022 vest
at a rate of one-third of the total number of RSUs on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.
Other Equity Incentive Plans
The Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan remains in effect only to the extent of awards outstanding under the plan as
of October 31, 2024.
123
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation was reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as follows
(in thousands):
Year Ended October 31,
2024
2023
2022
Cost of revenues
$
1,460
$
1,502
$
706
Administrative and selling expense
8,583
8,657
5,418
Research and development expense
1,428
1,429
456
$
11,471
$
11,588
$
6,580
Restricted Stock Units Including Performance Based Awards
The following table summarizes our RSU and PSU activity for the year ended October 31, 2024:
Restricted Stock Units
Shares
Weighted-Average
Fair Value
Outstanding as of October 31, 2023
217,947
$
151.89
Granted - time-vesting RSUs
313,883
38.13
Granted - PSUs
109,146
48.90
Vested
(76,420)
210.12
Forfeited
(47,995)
67.96
Outstanding as of October 31, 2024
516,561
$
64.53
On December 11, 2023, 218,292 RSUs were awarded to senior management under the FY 2023 LTI Plan, which included
109,146 PSUs and 109,146 time-based vesting RSUs. The 109,146 PSUs granted during the three months ended January
31, 2024 were contingent upon approval by the Company’s stockholders of additional authorized shares under the 2018
Incentive Plan, which approval was obtained at the 2024 Annual Meeting. The PSUs and time-based vesting RSUs are
expensed over the three-year service period.
In addition to the awards granted to senior management, during the year ended October 31, 2024, the Board also granted
a total of 204,737 time-based vesting RSU awards to certain salaried employees to promote ownership of the Company’s
equity and retention. The time-based vesting RSUs granted during the year ended October 31, 2024 vest at a rate of one-
third of the total number of RSUs granted on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.
PSUs are issued assuming participants achieve 100% target performance. The Company also reserves additional shares
assuming the maximum performance targets are met. As of October 31, 2024, the Company had reserved an additional
5,849 shares for potential issuance under the FY 2022 LTI Plan, an additional 35,539 shares for potential issuance under
the FY 2023 LTI Plan, and an additional 105,009 shares for potential issuance under the Long Term Incentive Plan for
awards made in fiscal year 2024.
RSU and PSU expense is based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant and is amortized over the vesting period,
which is generally over 3 or 4 years.
As of October 31, 2024, total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs and PSUs was $14.3 million, which is
expected to be recognized over approximately the next two years on a weighted-average basis.
Stock Awards
During the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we awarded 6,651, 3,454 and 2,562 shares, respectively, of fully
vested, unrestricted common stock to the independent members of our Board as a component of Board compensation,
which resulted in recognizing $0.2 million of expense for each of the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
124
Employee Tax-Deferred Savings Plans
We offer a 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”) to all full time employees that provides for tax-deferred salary deductions for
eligible employees (beginning the first month following an employee’s hire date). Employees may choose to make
voluntary contributions of their annual compensation to the 401(k) Plan, limited to an annual maximum amount as set
periodically by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Employee contributions are fully vested when made. Under the
401(k) Plan, there is no option available to the employee to receive or purchase our common stock. Matching contributions
of 2% under the 401(k) Plan aggregated $1.3 million, $1.1 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended October 31, 2024,
2023, and 2022, respectively.
Note 17. Income Taxes
The components of loss before income taxes for the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022 were as follows (in
thousands):
2024
2023
2022
U.S.
$ (140,713) $ (95,910)
$ (145,439)
Foreign
(16,040)
(11,565)
(974)
Loss before income taxes
$ (156,753) $ (107,475)
$ (146,413)
The Company recorded an income tax provision totaling $0.03 million, $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the years ended
October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The income tax expense primarily relates to foreign income and
withholding taxes in South Korea.
Franchise tax expense, which is included in administrative and selling expenses, was $0.5 million, $0.9 million and $1.0
million for the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate for the years ended October 31,
2024, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:
2024
2023
2022
Statutory federal income tax rate
(21.0)%
(21.0)%
(21.0)%
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
State taxes, net of Federal benefits
(4.4)%
(3.2)%
(3.6)%
Foreign withholding tax
0.1 %
0.5 %
0.6 %
Net operating loss expiration, impairment and true-ups
(1.1)%
6.1 %
8.7 %
Nondeductible expenditures
0.2 %
2.1 %
1.4 %
Change in tax rates
(0.4)%
2.8 %
0.3 %
Other, net
0.3 %
0.6 %
0.7 %
Deferred only adjustment
(0.4)%
(0.1)%
(0.1)%
Valuation allowance
26.8 %
12.7 %
13.6 %
Effective income tax rate
0.1 %
0.5 %
0.6 %
125
Our deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following as of October 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
2024
2023
Deferred tax assets:
Compensation and benefit accruals
$
7,344
$
6,026
Bad debt and other allowances
2,695
1,945
Capital loss and tax credit carry-forwards
16,296
14,701
Net operating losses (domestic and foreign)
170,780
139,900
Deferred license revenue
871
1,148
Accumulated depreciation
15,969
14,051
Grant revenue
210
323
Excess business interest
5,860
6,406
Operating lease liabilities
1,840
1,879
Capitalized research and development
18,305
9,729
Mark-to-market
1,702
987
Other
150
4
Gross deferred tax assets:
242,022
197,099
Valuation allowance
(228,139)
(193,477)
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance
13,883
3,622
Deferred tax liability:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(7,567)
—
In process research and development
(2,322)
(2,293)
Right of use assets
(1,556)
(1,600)
Other
(2,745)
(9)
Net deferred tax liability
$
(307)
$
(280)
We continually evaluate our deferred tax assets as to whether it is “more likely than not” that the deferred tax assets will
be realized. In assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversal of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. Based on the projections for future
taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are realizable, management believes significant
uncertainty exists surrounding the recoverability of the deferred tax assets. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance
against our net deferred tax assets. As of October 31, 2024, we had $1.06 billion of federal net operating loss (“NOL”)
carryforwards, $549.0 million of which expire in the fiscal years 2025 through 2037, and $506.0 million of which do not
expire. Due to limitations on the Company’s ability to utilize the federal NOL carryforwards, the Company has only
recognized $588.0 million for financial statement purposes. As of October 31, 2024, we also had $585.1 million of state
NOL carryforwards that expire in the fiscal years 2025 through 2043. Additionally, as of October 31, 2024, we had $13.7
million of state tax credits available that will expire from tax years 2025 through 2043.
During the 2020 tax year, the Company experienced an “ownership change” as defined by Internal Revenue Code
Section 382. As a result, the utilization of federal and state NOLs generated prior to October of 2020 is subject to limitation
and a reduction was made in fiscal year 2020 to the carrying balance of the federal and state NOLs to reflect the future
limitation on utilization. The Company has updated its analysis of potential ownership changes through October 31, 2024
and concluded that no additional ownership changes have occurred subsequent to October 2020. In addition, the
acquisition of Versa Power Systems Ltd. in fiscal year 2013 triggered a Section 382 ownership change at the level of Versa
Power Systems Ltd. which will limit the future usage of some of the federal and state NOLs that we acquired in that
transaction. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax asset associated with these
attributes to reflect the future limitation on utilization.
The Company’s financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of uncertain tax positions that the Company
has taken or expects to take on a tax return (including a decision whether to file or not file a return in a particular
jurisdiction) presuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of October 31, 2024 and 2023. It is our policy to record
interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as income taxes; however, because of our significant NOLs, no
provision for interest or penalties has been recorded.
126
We file income tax returns in the U.S. and certain states, primarily Connecticut, California and New York, as well as
income tax returns required internationally for South Korea, Germany, Japan and Canada. We are open to examination by
the IRS and various states in which we file for fiscal year 2004 to the present.
Note 18. Loss Per Share
Basic loss per common share (“EPS”) are generally calculated as loss available to common stockholders divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is generally calculated as loss available to common
stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of common
share equivalents.
The calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was as follows (amounts
in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
Year Ended October 31,
2024
2023
2022
Numerator
Net loss attributable to FuelCell Energy, Inc.
$
(126,009) $
(107,568) $
(142,722)
Series B preferred stock dividends
(3,200)
(3,200)
(3,200)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(129,209) $
(110,768) $
(145,922)
Denominator
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic
16,505,257
13,991,593
12,771,305
Effect of dilutive securities (1)
-
-
—
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted
16,505,257
13,991,593
12,771,305
Net loss to common stockholders per share – basic
$
(7.83) $
(7.92) $
(11.43)
Net loss to common stockholders per share – diluted (1)
$
(7.83) $
(7.92) $
(11.43)
(1) Due to the net loss to common stockholders in each of the years presented above, diluted earnings per share was
computed without consideration to potentially dilutive instruments as their inclusion would have been antidilutive. As
of October 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, potentially dilutive securities excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation
are as follows:
October 31,
October 31,
October 31,
2024
2023
2022
Outstanding options to purchase common stock
574
610
674
Unvested Restricted Stock Units
516,561
218,105
84,029
5% Series B Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
1,261
1,261
1,261
Total potentially dilutive securities
518,396
219,976
85,965
127
Note 19. Restricted Cash
As of October 31, 2024 and 2023, there was $60.8 million and $49.6 million, respectively, of restricted cash and cash
equivalents pledged as performance security, reserved for future debt service requirements, and reserved for letters of
credit for certain banking requirements and contracts. The allocation of restricted cash is as follows (in thousands):
October 31,
October 31,
2024
2023
Cash Restricted for Outstanding Letters of Credit (1)
$
14,152
$
14,152
Cash Restricted for Crestmark Sale-Leaseback Transactions
2,908
2,901
Debt Service and Performance Reserves related to OpCo Financing Facility
24,721
19,698
Debt Service and Performance Reserves related to the Senior and Subordinated
Back Leverage Loan Facilities
12,869
9,294
Other
6,100
3,579
Total Restricted Cash
60,750
49,624
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents – Short-Term (2)
(12,161)
(5,159)
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents – Long-Term
$
48,589
$
44,465
(1) Letters of credit outstanding as of October 31, 2024 expire on various dates through October 2029.
(2) Short-term restricted cash and cash equivalents are amounts expected to be released and categorized as unrestricted
cash within twelve months of the balance sheet date.
Note 20. Commitments and Contingencies
Service Agreements
Under the provisions of its service agreements, the Company provides services to maintain, monitor, and repair customer
power plants to meet minimum operating levels. Under the terms of such service agreements, the particular power plant
must meet a minimum operating output during defined periods of the term. If minimum output falls below the contract
requirement, the Company may be subject to performance penalties and/or may be required to repair or replace the
customer’s fuel cell module(s).
Power Purchase Agreements
Under the terms of the Company’s PPAs, customers agree to purchase power from the Company’s fuel cell power plants
at negotiated rates. Electricity rates are generally a function of the customers’ current and estimated future electricity
pricing available from the grid. As owner or lessee of the power plants, the Company is responsible for all operating costs
necessary to maintain, monitor and repair the power plants. Under certain agreements, the Company is also responsible
for procuring fuel, generally natural gas or biogas, to run the power plants. In addition, under the terms of some of the
PPAs, the Company may be subject to a performance penalty if the Company does not meet certain performance
requirements.
Project Fuel Exposure
Certain of our PPAs for project assets in our generation operating portfolio expose us to fluctuating fuel price risks as well
as the risk of being unable to procure the required amounts of fuel and the lack of alternative available fuel sources. We
seek to mitigate our fuel risk using strategies including: (i) fuel cost reimbursement mechanisms in our PPAs to allow for
pass through of fuel costs (full or partial) where possible, which we have done with our 14.9 MW operating project in
Bridgeport, CT; (ii) procuring fuel under fixed price physical supply contracts with investment grade counterparties, which
we have done for twenty years for our Tulare BioMAT project, the initial seven years of the twenty year PPA for our LIPA
Yaphank Project (through September 2028), six years of the twenty year PPA for our 14.0 MW and 2.8 MW Derby Projects
(through October 2029), and the initial two years of the twenty year hydrogen power purchase agreement for our Toyota
project (through May of 2025); and (iii) potentially entering into future financial hedges with investment grade
counterparties to offset potential negative market fluctuations. If the Company is unable to secure fuel on favorable
economic terms, it may result in impairment charges to the Derby and Yaphank project assets and further charges for the
Toyota project asset.
128
The Company net settled certain natural gas purchases under previous normal purchase normal sale contract designations
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2023 for one contract and the second quarter of fiscal year 2024 for other contracts,
which resulted in a change to mark-to-market accounting. The Company recorded a mark-to-market net loss of $6.9 million
and a mark-to-market net gain of $4.1 million associated with the natural gas contract derivatives for the years ended
October 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company has recorded derivative assets within other assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, which had an estimated fair value of $1.2 million and $4.1 million as of October 31, 2024
and October 31, 2023, respectively. The Company has recorded derivative liabilities within long-term debt and other
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, which had an estimated fair value of $4.0 million and $0 as of October 31,
2024 and October 31, 2023, respectively. The natural gas contract derivatives are classified as Level 2 financial
assets/liabilities since the values can be determined based on readily observable inputs for underlying natural gas forward
prices.
Other
As of October 31, 2024, the Company had unconditional purchase commitments aggregating $90.8 million, for materials,
supplies and services in the normal course of business.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings, including, but not limited to, regulatory proceedings,
claims, mediations, arbitrations and litigation, arising out of the ordinary course of its business (“Legal Proceedings”).
Although the Company cannot assure the outcome of such Legal Proceedings, management presently believes that the
result of such Legal Proceedings, either individually, or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no material amounts have been accrued in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements with respect to these matters.
Note 21. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following represents supplemental cash flow information (in thousands):
Year Ended October 31,
2024
2023
2022
Cash interest paid
$
6,796
$
3,088
$
1,556
Income taxes paid
16
6
2
Noncash financing and investing activity:
Noncash reclassifications between inventory and project assets
4,586
1,987
1,260
Noncash reclassifications from inventory to fixed assets
—
—
1,552
Noncash reclassifications from other assets to project assets
—
—
2,375
Director stock compensation
159
225
305
Accrued noncontrolling interest distribution
—
148
—
Addition of operating lease liabilities
395
1,952
—
Addition of operating lease right-of-use assets
395
1,952
—
Noncash reduction in basis of project assets
—
6,330
—
Accrued purchase of fixed assets, cash paid to be paid in subsequent period
2,958
1,646
4,396
Accrued purchase of project assets, cash to be paid in subsequent period
269
4,515
6,444
129
Note 22. Subsequent Events
Global Restructuring
On November 15, 2024, the Company announced a global restructuring of its operations in the U.S., Canada and Germany
that aims to reduce operating costs, realign resources toward advancing the Company’s core technologies, and protect the
Company’s competitive position amid slower-than-expected investments in clean energy. In connection with the
restructuring plan, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 13% or 75 employees in November 2024.
The actions under the restructuring plan are expected to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal
year 2025. In connection with the restructuring plan and workforce reduction, the Company estimates it will incur
aggregate restructuring-related costs and charges of approximately $1.7 million to $2.0 million in cash costs related to
severance payments and other employee termination benefits. These charges are expected to be recorded in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2025.
Groton Tax Equity Financing Transaction
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, on December 12, 2024 the Company closed on the second annual funding
related to the tax equity financing for the Groton Project. The Company achieved all conditions precedent required for the
second annual funding from East West Bank under the tax equity financing transaction between the Company and East
West Bank and, as a result, the Company received a $4.0 million contribution which will be recorded as noncontrolling
interest on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
130
Item 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
Item 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and
principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the
end of the period covered by this report.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Management of FuelCell Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
x
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company;
x
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and that
receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Company; and
x
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive and principal financial
officers, we evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2024, based on criteria
for effective internal control over financial reporting established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment,
we have concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2024
based on the specified criteria. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an
audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-
K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
131
Item 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
(a) On December 27, 2024, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Amended Sales Agreement, which
removes certain representations and warranties relating to the Company’s status as a well-known seasoned issuer.
The foregoing description of Amendment No. 2 to the Amended Sales Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of Amendment No. 2 to the Amended Sales Agreement, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
For additional information regarding the Amended Sales Agreement, please see the “Liquidity and Capital Resources”
subsection of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(b) During the three months ended October 31, 2024, no director or Section 16 officer of the
Company adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each
term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9C.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
132
PART III
Item 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item 10, with respect to our executive officers, is included in Part I of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K under the heading “Information about our Executive Officers”. The other information required by this
Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days
after fiscal year end.
Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code”), which applies to the board of directors, named executive
officers, and all employees. The Code provides a statement of certain fundamental principles and key policies and
procedures that govern the conduct of our business. The Code covers all major areas of professional conduct, including
employment policies, conflicts of interest, intellectual property and the protection of confidential information, as well as
strict adherence to all laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. As required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, our Audit, Finance and Risk Committee has procedures to receive, retain, investigate and resolve complaints
received regarding our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and to allow for the confidential and
anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Code can
be found in the Corporate Governance sub-section of the section entitled “Investors” on our website
at www.fuelcellenergy.com. We intend to disclose any changes in, or waivers from, the Code by posting such information
on the same website or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, in each case to the extent such disclosure is required by
rules of the SEC or Nasdaq.
Item 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required under this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement to be filed
with the SEC within 120 days after fiscal year end.
Item 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required under this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement to be filed
with the SEC within 120 days after fiscal year end.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans as of the end of the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2024.
Number of
Number of
Common
securities
Shares to
Weighted-
remaining
be issued
average
available for
upon
exercise
future
exercise of
price of
issuance
outstanding
outstanding
under equity
options and
options and
compensation
Plan Category
rights
rights
plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
Equity incentive plans (1)
574
$
1,302.17
607,453
Employee stock purchase plan
—
—
11,562
Total
574
$
1,302.17
619,015
(1) Includes the Company’s 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
133
Item 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Information required under this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement to be filed
with the SEC within 120 days after fiscal year end.
Item 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information required under this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement to be filed
with the SEC within 120 days after fiscal year end.
134
PART IV
Item 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1
Financial Statements — See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
2
Financial Statement Schedules — Supplemental schedules are not provided because of the absence of conditions
under which they are required or because the required information is given in the financial statements or notes
thereto.
3
Exhibits — The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
Description
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended, July 12, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999).
3.2
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated November 21, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated January
12, 2017).
3.3
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated October 31, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 3, 2003).
3.4
Certificate of Designation for the Company’s 5% Series B Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report Form 8-K, dated
November 22, 2004).
3.5
Amended Certificate of Designation of 5% Series B Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock,
dated March 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated January 12, 2017).
3.6
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated April 8, 2011
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
January 12, 2017).
3.7
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated April 5, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
January 12, 2017).
3.8
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated December 3, 2015
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 3, 2015).
3.9
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated April 18, 2016
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended April 30, 2016).
3.10
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated April 7, 2017
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended April 30, 2017).
3.11
Certificate of Designations for the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 5, 2017).
135
Exhibit No.
Description
3.12
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated December 14, 2017
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 14, 2017).
3.13
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights for the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
August 27, 2018).
3.14
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of FuelCell Energy, Inc., dated May 8, 2019
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 8,
2019).
3.15
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of FuelCell Energy, Inc., dated May 11, 2020
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12,
2020).
3.16
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of FuelCell Energy, Inc. dated April 8, 2021
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on April
14, 2021).
3.17
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of FuelCell Energy, Inc., dated October 11,
2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
October 11, 2023).
3.18
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of FuelCell Energy, Inc., effective November
8, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
November 7, 2024).
3.19
Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, effective as of September 3, 2024 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2024).
4.1
Description of Securities Registered Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
10.1
**Alliance Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and POSCO Energy, dated as of February 7, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January
31, 2009).
10.2
**Technology Transfer, License and Distribution Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and POSCO
Energy, dated as of February 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form
10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2009).
10.3
**Stack Technology Transfer and License Agreement dated as of October 27, 2009, by and between
FuelCell Energy, Inc. and POSCO Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s
Current Report Form 8-K, dated October 27, 2009).
10.4
Lease agreement, dated March 8, 2000, between the Company and Technology Park Associates, L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended April 30, 2000).
10.5
*FuelCell Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.59 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2015).
10.6
Letter agreement, dated September 28, 2015, between the Company and Technology Park Associates,
L.L.C. exercising the extension option per the terms of the Lease Agreement, dated March 8, 2000,
between the Company and Technology Park Associates, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.60 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2015).
10.7
*Employment Agreement, dated March 21, 2012 and effective as of January 1, 2012 between the
Company and Michael Bishop, Chief Financial Officer (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 10.68 to
the Company’s Current Report Form 8-K, dated March 21, 2012).
136
Exhibit No.
Description
10.8
Cell Technology Transfer and License Agreement dated October 31, 2012 by and between the Company
and POSCO Energy, Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K/A dated as of October 31, 2012 and filed on January 7, 2013).
10.9
Amendment to Technology Transfer Distribution and Licensing Agreement dated as of February 7, 2007
and the Stack Technology Transfer License Agreement dated as of October 27, 2009, each by and between
the Company and POSCO Energy, Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of October 31, 2012).
10.10
Loan Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2013, between Clean Energy Finance and Investment Authority, as
Lender, and the Company, as Borrower (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.69 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2013).
10.11
Security Agreement, dated March 5, 2013, by the Company in favor of the Clean Energy Finance and
Investment Authority (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2013).
10.12
Assistance Agreement, dated November 19, 2015, by and between the State of Connecticut Acting by the
Department of Economic Community and Development and the Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.84 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2015).
10.13
Phase 1 Promissory Note, dated November 19, 2015, between the Company and the State of Connecticut
Acting by and through the Department of Economic Community and Development (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.85 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October
31, 2015).
10.14
Amendment to Alliance Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2016, by and between the Company and
POSCO Energy Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated October 10, 2016).
10.15
Amendment to Technology Transfer, Distribution and Licensing Agreement, dated as of October 10,
2016, by and between the Company and POSCO Energy Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 2016).
10.16
Amendment to Stack Technology Transfer and License Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2016, by and
between the Company and POSCO Energy Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 2016).
10.17
Memorandum of Understanding for Market Transition dated as of March 17, 2017, by and between the
Company and POSCO Energy Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 17, 2017).
10.18
First Amendment to Assistance Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2017, and approved by the State of
Connecticut, Office of the Attorney General on April 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2017).
10.19
*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (U.S. Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2018).
10.20
*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (U.S. Employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2018).
10.21
*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2018).
10.22
*Form of Option Award Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2018).
10.23
Second Amendment to Assistance Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2019, and approved by the State of
Connecticut, Office of the Attorney General on January 28, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2019).
137
Exhibit No.
Description
10.24
License Agreement, effective as of June 11, 2019, between ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Company and FuelCell Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2019).
10.25
*Employment Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2019, by and between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Michael
Lisowski (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on July 30, 2019).
10.26
*Employment Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2019, by and between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Anthony
Leo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
July 30, 2019).
10.27
*Employment Agreement, effective as of August 26, 2019, by and between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and
Jason B. Few (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on August 20, 2019).
10.28
Joint Development Agreement, effective October 31, 2019, by and between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2019).
10.29
Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2019, by and among FuelCell Energy, Inc. and
Connecticut Green Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2019).
10.30
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 11, 2020, by and between Central CA Fuel Cell 2, LLC and
Crestmark Equipment Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2020).
10.31
Equipment Lease Agreement, dated February 11, 2020, by and between Central CA Fuel Cell 2, LLC and
Crestmark Equipment Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2020).
10.32
Assignment Agreement, dated February 11, 2020, by Central CA Fuel Cell 2, LLC in favor of Crestmark
Equipment Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 13, 2020).
10.33
Pledge Agreement, dated February 11, 2020, by and between FuelCell Energy Finance, LLC and
Crestmark Equipment Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2020).
10.34
Guaranty Agreement, dated February 11, 2020, by FuelCell Energy, Inc. in favor of Crestmark Equipment
Finance (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 13, 2020).
10.35
Technology License and Access Agreement for Tulare BioMAT Fuel Cell Power Plant, dated February
11, 2020, by and among Crestmark Equipment Finance, Central CA Fuel Cell 2, LLC and FuelCell
Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2020).
10.36
Paycheck Protection Program Promissory Note, entered into on April 20, 2020 and dated April 16, 2020,
between Liberty Bank and FuelCell Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2020).
10.37
*First Amendment, dated as of April 23, 2020, to the Employment Agreement, effective as of August 26,
2019, between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Jason B. Few (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2020).
10.38
*FuelCell Energy, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan as approved August 24, 2020 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2020).
138
Exhibit No.
Description
10.39
*Form of FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan Performance Share Award (Relative TSR)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August
24, 2020).
10.40
*Form of FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan Performance Share Award (Absolute TSR)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August
24, 2020).
10.41
*FuelCell Energy, Inc. Fiscal Year 2021 Long Term Incentive Plan, as approved November 24, 2020
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
November 27, 2020).
10.42
*Form of FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan Relative TSR Performance Share Award
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on November 27, 2020).
10.43
*Form of FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan Absolute TSR Performance Share Award
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on November 27, 2020).
10.44
*Second Amendment, dated as of January 19, 2021, to the Employment Agreement, effective as of August
26, 2019, between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Jason B. Few (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2021).
10.45
Open Market Sale AgreementSM between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Jefferies LLC and Barclays Capital
Inc., dated June 11, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on
June 11, 2021).
10.46
*Employment Agreement, dated August 2, 2021, between Joshua Dolger and FuelCell Energy, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended July 31, 2021).
10.47
Amendment No. 1 to Joint Development Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and ExxonMobil
Research and Engineering Company, fully executed on October 29, 2021 and effective as of October 31,
2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
November 2, 2021).
10.48
Letter Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2021 and effective as of October 29, 2021, between FuelCell
Energy, Inc. and ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2021).
10.49
Settlement Agreement, dated December 20, 2021, by and between FuelCell Energy, Inc., POSCO Energy
Co., Ltd., and Korea Fuel Cell Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2021).
10.50
*Employment Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2022 and effective as of April 18, 2022, by and between
FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Mark Feasel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2022).
10.51
Amendment No. 2 to Joint Development Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and ExxonMobil
Technology and Engineering Company, effective as of April 30, 2022 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2022).
10.52
Open Market Sale AgreementSM among FuelCell Energy, Inc., Jefferies LLC, B. Riley Securities, Inc.,
Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Canaccord Genuity LLC,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Loop Capital Markets LLC, dated July 12,
2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
July 12, 2022).
10.53
Amendment No. 3 to Joint Development Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and ExxonMobil
Technology and Engineering Company, fully executed on December 19, 2022 and effective as of
139
Exhibit No.
Description
December 1, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on December 19, 2022).
10.54
Lease, dated May 20, 2005, between Westpen Properties Ltd. and Versa Power Systems Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on
March 9, 2023).
10.55
Lease Amending Agreement, dated April 20, 2006, between Westpen Properties Ltd. and Versa Power
Systems Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed on March 9, 2023).
10.56
Lease Renewal Agreement, dated November 11, 2010, between 52nd Street Business Centre LP, by its
General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems Ltd. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 9, 2023).
10.57
Lease Extension and Amending Agreement, dated October 29, 2013, between 52nd Street Business Centre
LP, by its General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on
March 9, 2023).
10.58
Lease Extension Agreement, dated November 9, 2016, between 52nd Street Business Centre LP, by its
General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems Ltd. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 9, 2023).
10.59
Lease Extension Agreement, dated January 10, 2020, between 52nd Street Business Centre LP, by its
General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems Ltd. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 9, 2023).
10.60
Lease Expansion, Extension and Amending Agreement, dated January 5, 2023, between 52nd Street
Business Centre LP, by its General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems
Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on
March 9, 2023).
10.61
Lease Expansion and Amending Agreement – Short Term, dated February 20, 2023, between 52nd Street
Business Centre LP, by its General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems
Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on
March 9, 2023).
10.62
Letter Agreement between ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company and FuelCell Energy, Inc.
dated May 8, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed on June 8, 2023).
10.63
FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated effective as of May
22, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 23, 2023).
10.64
*FuelCell Energy, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of April
4, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
April 4, 2024).
10.65
Financing Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, among FuelCell Energy Opco Finance 1, LLC (as Borrower),
the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto, and Investec Bank plc (as Administrative
Agent and Collateral Agent) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed May 25, 2023).
10.66
Omnibus Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, made by FuelCell Energy
Finance, LLC (as Pledgor), FuelCell Energy Opco Finance 1, LLC (as Borrower), and Bridgeport Fuel
Cell, LLC, Groton Fuel Cell 1, LLC, Riverside Fuel Cell, LLC, SRJFC, LLC, FuelCell YT HoldCo, LLC,
and New Britain Renewable Energy, LLC (as Subsidiary Guarantors) in favor of Investec Bank plc (as
Collateral Agent) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-
K filed May 25, 2023).
140
Exhibit No.
Description
10.67
Depositary Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, by and among FuelCell Energy Opco Finance 1, LLC (as
Borrower), Investec Bank plc (as Collateral Agent and Administrative Agent), and Liberty Bank (as
Depositary Agent) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed May 25, 2023).
10.68
ISDA 2002 Master Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, between Investec Bank plc and FuelCell Energy
Opco Finance 1, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed May 25, 2023).
10.69
ISDA Schedule to the 2002 Master Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, between Investec Bank plc and
FuelCell Energy Opco Finance 1, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 25, 2023).
10.70
ISDA 2002 Master Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, between Bank of Montreal and FuelCell Energy
Opco Finance 1, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed May 25, 2023).
10.71
ISDA Schedule to the 2002 Master Agreement, dated May 19, 2023, between Bank of Montreal and
FuelCell Energy Opco Finance 1, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 25, 2023).
10.72
Third Amendment to Assistance Agreement by and between the State of Connecticut Acting by the
Department of Economic and Community Development, and FuelCell Energy, Inc., effective May 24,
2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May
30, 2023).
10.73
Amendment No. 1 to Financing Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2023, among FuelCell Energy Opco
Finance 1, LLC (as Borrower), Investec Bank plc (as Administrative Agent and Lender), Liberty Bank (as
Lender), Bank of Montreal (as Lender), Amalgamated Bank (as Lender), and Connecticut Green Bank (as
Lender) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
August 17, 2023).
10.74
Credit Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, among FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC (as Borrower),
Liberty Bank (as Administrative Agent and Lead Arranger), and the Lenders party thereto (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.75
Credit Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, among FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC (as Borrower),
Connecticut Green Bank (as Administrative Agent), and the Lender party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.76
Security Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, by FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC for the benefit of
Liberty Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 24, 2023).
10.77
Pledge and Security Agreement dated August 19, 2023, by FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC for the
benefit of Liberty Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.78
Deposit Account Security and Pledge Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, among FuelCell Energy Finance
Holdco, LLC, Groton Station Fuel Cell, LLC, and Liberty Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.79
Security Agreement, dated, August 18, 2023, by FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC for the benefit of
Connecticut Green Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.80
Pledge and Security Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, by FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC for the
benefit of Connecticut Green Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
141
Exhibit No.
Description
10.81
Deposit Account Security and Pledge Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, among FuelCell Energy Finance
Holdco, LLC, Groton Station Fuel Cell, LLC, and Connecticut Green Bank (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.82
Subordination Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, among Connecticut Green Bank, Liberty Bank, and the
Senior Lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.83
Interparty Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, among East West Bank, FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco,
LLC, Amalgamated Bank, Liberty Bank, and Connecticut Green Bank (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.84
Limited Guaranty and Subordination Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, by FuelCell Energy, Inc. for the
benefit of Liberty Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.85
Limited Guaranty and Subordination Agreement, dated August 18, 2023, by FuelCell Energy, Inc. for the
benefit of Connecticut Green Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2023).
10.86
Amendment No. 4 to Joint Development Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and ExxonMobil
Technology and Engineering Company, executed on August 25, 2023 and effective as of August 31, 2023
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 28,
2023).
10.87
Lease Amending Agreement, dated September 25, 2023, between 52nd Street Business Centre LP, by its
General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems Ltd. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.87 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October
31, 2023, filed on December 19, 2023).
10.88
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2023, between Connecticut Green Bank
(as administrative agent and lender party) and FuelCell Energy Finance HoldCo, LLC. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.88 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October
31, 2023, filed on December 19, 2023).
10.89
*Form of FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan Performance Share Award Agreement
(Relative TSR – Contingent Award) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2023).
10.90
Amendment No. 2 to Financing Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2024, among FuelCell Energy Opco
Finance 1, LLC (as Borrower), Investec Bank plc (as Administrative Agent and Lender), Liberty Bank (as
Lender), Bank of Montreal (as Lender), Amalgamated Bank (as Lender), and Connecticut Green Bank (as
Lender) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 4, 2024).
10.91
Amendment No. 3 to Financing Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2024, between FuelCell Energy Opco
Finance 1, LLC (as Borrower), Investec Bank plc (as Administrative Agent and Lender), Liberty Bank (as
Lender), Bank of Montreal (as Lender), Amalgamated Bank (as Lender), and Connecticut Green Bank (as
Lender) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on June 10, 2024).
10.92
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 2, 2024, between FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco, LLC (as
Borrower) and Liberty Bank (as Administrative Agent and Lender) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 10, 2024).
10.93
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated May 2, 2024, among FuelCell Energy Finance Holdco,
LLC (as Borrower) and Connecticut Green Bank (as Administrative Agent and Lender) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 10, 2024).
142
Exhibit No.
Description
10.94
Amendment No. 5 to Joint Development Agreement between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and ExxonMobil
Technology and Engineering Company, executed and effective as of March 31, 2024 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 4, 2024).
10.95
Amendment No. 1 to Open Market Sale Agreement among FuelCell Energy, Inc., Jefferies LLC, B. Riley
Securities, Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Canaccord
Genuity LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Loop Capital Markets
LLC, dated April 10, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on April 10, 2024).
10.96
Lease Expansion and Amending Agreement, dated August 2, 2024, between 52nd Street Business Centre,
LP, by its General Partner, 52nd Street Business Centre GP Inc., and Versa Power Systems Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on
September 5, 2024).
10.97
*Employment Separation Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2024, by and between FuelCell Energy,
Inc. and Anthony Leo.
10.98
Amendment No. 2 to Open Market Sale Agreement among FuelCell Energy, Inc., Jefferies LLC, B. Riley
Securities, Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Canaccord
Genuity LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Loop Capital Markets
LLC, dated December 27, 2024.
19
FuelCell Energy, Inc. Insider Trading Policy
21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
97
FuelCell Energy, Inc. Compensation Recovery Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2023, filed on December 19,
2023).
101.INS#
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File
because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH#
Inline XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL#
Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB#
Inline XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE#
Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF#
Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
*
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement
**
Confidential Treatment has been granted for portions of this document
#
Filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the following documents formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2024 and 2023,
(ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024,
143
2023 and 2022, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024,
2023 and 2022, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2024, 2023 and
2022, (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and (vi) the information included in Part II, Item 9B(b).
Item 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
144
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.
/s/ Jason B. Few
Dated: December 27, 2024
Jason B. Few
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Capacity
Date
/s/ Jason B. Few
Jason B. Few
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
December 27, 2024
/s/ Michael S. Bishop
Michael S. Bishop
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
December 27, 2024
/s/ James H. England
James H. England
Director – Chairman of the Board
December 27, 2024
/s/ Betsy Bingham
Betsy Bingham
Director
December 27, 2024
/s/ Cynthia Hansen
Cynthia Hansen
Director
December 27, 2024
/s/ Matthew Hilzinger
Matthew Hilzinger
Director
December 27, 2024
/s/ Tyrone Michael (“TJ”) Jordan
Tyrone Michael (“TJ”) Jordan
Director
December 27, 2024
/s/ Donna Sims Wilson
Donna Sims Wilson
Director
December 27, 2024
/s/ Natica von Althann
Natica von Althann
Director
December 27, 2024
[7KLVSDJHLQWHQWLRQDOO\OHIWEODQN]