Quarterlytics / GBM Resources

GBM Resources

gbz · ASX
Claim this profile
Ticker gbz
Exchange ASX
Sector
Industry
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · GBM Resources
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ABN 91 124 752 745

Annual Report 2013

Contents

Chairman’s Report 

2013 Highlights Summary 

Review of Operations 

Sustainable Development 

Tenement Schedule 

Corporate Governance Statement 

Directors’ Report 

Auditor’s Independence Declaration 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 

Notes to the Financial Statements 

Directors’ Declaration 

Independent Auditor’s Report 

ASX Additional Information 

Corporate Directory 

1

2

3-26

27

28

29-33

34-40

41

42

43

44

45

46-67

68

69-70

71-72

73

Chairman’s Report

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

GBM Resources Limited underwent significant change over the last 12 months as we completed a strategic review 
of our operations to better position the company for growth through project development, and to preserve and 
grow shareholder value in a challenging market.

With backing from our major Singaporean shareholders, the Company commenced a review for near-term gold 
production acquisition opportunities in the region with the objective of becoming a low-cost gold producer and 
to take advantage of the strong growth potential of South East Asia.

Acquiring 40% of Angka Alamjaya Sdn Bhd (AASB), which holds the Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine in Peninsular Malaysia, 
for 15% of GBM shares, in August this year, offers the Company potential for early cashflow from the re-treatment 
of tailings before moving to hard rock mining.

Commissioning a processing plant at the Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine and production of gold concentrate could occur 
as early as March 2014. Both parties also intend to complete an Initial Public Offering of AASB on the Singapore 
Stock Exchange during 2014.

This strategic review also enabled us to implement major expenditure reduction initiatives across the operations. 
The Company has focussed its priorities on:

n  Continue field programmes on the Mount Morgan Gold-Copper Project, targeting the Sandy Creek, Smelter 

Return and Oaky Creek prospects to progress them as drill ready targets this year. 

n  Drilling of priority prospects including Bronzewing Bore (Bungalien Project) and the Mount Margaret West Project 
within the farm-in Joint Venture area. GBM has secured an approved $2.5 million budget, for the 12 months 
to 31 March 2014, on the farm-in projects with Japanese trading house partners, Pan Pacific Copper Co. Ltd. 
and Mitsui & Co.

n  Continue to investigate funding opportunities to progress the Pre-Feasibility Studies for the Milo IOCG-REE 

Project. 

n  Major expenditure reduction initiatives implemented which achieved further annualised savings of $600,000. 

This includes salary reductions for executive directors, senior staff and reductions in other external service costs, 
so as to prioritise exploration expenditure. 

The Board and management believes it is important to ensure that it is taking all possible steps to preserve 
shareholder value and believe we are well positioned to fast-track to production and grow our asset base and 
to deliver shareholders long-term value creation.

On behalf of the Board, I would like to acknowledge and thank our shareholders for their support during this pivotal 
year for the Company.

We look forward to sharing further updates on the progress of our development plans during the year ahead.

Peter Thompson 
Executive Chairman

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013 

1

 
2013 Highlights Summary

The Company completed a strategic assessment of its activities during the year and commenced a review for 
near-term gold production acquisition opportunities with the objective of becoming a low-cost gold producer and 
to take advantage of the strong growth potential of South East Asia.

This resulted in the Company acquiring 40% of Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine in Peninsular Malaysia with Angka Alamjaya 
Sdn Bhd (AASB), which holds the project, for 15% of GBM shares in August this year. The Lubuk Mandi Gold project 
offers the potential for early production by the re-treatment of tailings, progressing to hard rock mining.

A zero harm record in safety and environment during 2013 is in line with the Company’s zero harm policy, and 
is a record that the management and board of GBM are rightly proud of. We continue to improve our safety and 
environmental management systems while exploring efficiently, aiming to discover and develop projects in the 
shortest possible timeframe.

Exploration highlights for the 2013 financial year included:

n  Zero LTI’s and Environmental incidents during the year.

n  Acquisition of a 40% stake in the Lubuk Mandi gold project in Malaysia.

n  Completion of a development plan for Lubuk Mandi showing an exploration target of up to 440,000 

ounces of gold** and potential for early cashflow from tailings retreatment.

n  Positive scoping study completed for the polymetallic Milo IOCG-REEY deposit.

n  Maiden CuEq resource announced for the Milo Project.

n  Discovery of copper mineralization associated with an altered hydrothermal breccia at Oakey Creek 

in the Mount Morgan Project area.

n 

Intersection of anomalous copper mineralization in the first scout hole in the Mount Margaret Project 
area near Cloncurry.

Pan Pacific Copper and Mitsui JV representatives in the field with GBM exploration staff.

2  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Review of Operations

1.0  Exploration Strategy

Corporate Goal
GBM is focused on delivery of shareholder value through 
discovery or acquisition and development of world class 
gold and copper deposits. The company is determined 
to achieve this in a safe and responsible manner with the 
highest regard for the environment and communities in 
which we work.

Exploration strategy
Since listing in October 2007, GBM’s Board has 
maintained a constant focus on creating shareholder 
wealth through discovery and development of world 
class gold and copper gold deposits. During the past 
twelve months the Board, recognising the continued 
strength of gold as a commodity and changing economic 
climate for exploration companies, has further honed 
the focus on gold. Long term forecasts for price and 
demand of both primary target commodities copper and 
gold remain sound at a time when other commodities 
are forecast to be approaching oversupply and prices 
are falling. As a result the company has identified 
and proceeded to acquire a significant stake in a 
near production gold asset in an exciting and under-
explored gold province, the Lubuk Mandi Gold Project 
in Peninsular Malaysia. At the time of writing, resource 
drilling was advancing in parallel with a pre-feasibility 
study to treat mine tailings from previous operations, and 
to test extensions to gold mineralisation which yielded 
over 100,000 ounces in previous open pit mining.

The Board also recognise that during the exploration 
process, mineralisation enriched in other commodities 
may also be identified providing further opportunities to 
add additional shareholder value. This was highlighted 
last year with the implementation of a scoping study 
covering the Milo IOCG REE deposit in Queensland. The 
results of this study are summarised later in this report. 
Further opportunities identified include extensive REE 
mineralisation associated with the Milo IOCG system, 
significant tungsten and molybdenum intersections at the 
Yea project, extensive graphite occurrences in the Mount 
Margaret Project north of Cloncurry and Phosphate at 
the Bungalien Project south of Mt Isa.

GBM is committed to continuing to actively pursue 
discovery and development as the means to create 
shareholder value. Despite challenging market 
conditions, the company has succeeded in maintaining 
exploration and development activity at a high level as 
part of maximising the potential for near term discovery 
(see Figure 2).

The current downturn in mineral exploration has, and 
will continue to result in a range of exploration and 
development opportunities emerging for companies 
positioned to take advantage of adverse market 
conditions. The Board annually reviews the key drivers 

of exploration success for GBM. The Board believes that 
the eight points listed below are fundamental to ensuring 
continued success in discovering new economic mineral 
deposits.

These key drivers are outlined as follows:

Identifying opportunities for early production 
and cashflow in deposits with potential for major 
resource growth.

Acquisition of a significant interest in the Lubuk Mandi 
Gold Project in the under-explored Eastern Gold Belt of 
Peninsular Malaysia is only the first step in this process. 
Current difficult conditions for explorers may present 
further opportunities for those with access to funding.

Focus on the discovery of world class gold and 
copper gold deposits.

Targeting mineralisation styles capable of delivering 
large deposits in commodities with sound historical 
and projected demand.

Discovery of a new deposit(s) is the key to adding 
significant value to shareholders.

Recently acquired interests in an emerging gold province 
compliment previous success in our current exploration 
assets. GBM is well on the way to achieving this 
outcome.

Competent, rapid and cost effective evaluation 
of discoveries.

Ensuring that evaluation of discoveries is cost effective 
and timely is essential to unlock value for shareholders 
in the most favourable timeframe.

Applying a systems approach to mineral exploration.

The importance of this approach, in ‘seeing what others 
have not’, cannot be emphasised too strongly. In many 
instances previous exploration has focussed on small 
scale prospect level evaluation and failed to understand 
the broader geological environment or system. This is 
essential to determine the likelihood of major deposits 
occurring, and provide vectors to their location and style.

Exploring in regions with historic production offers 
a higher probability of new discovery.

Exploration success in recent decades has been strongly 
biased to regions with an established mining history. 
GBM’s current projects lie in such regions or areas where 
recent geological interpretation indicates an extension 
of known mineral provinces. Our focus to date has 
been toward regions which, apart from being highly 
prospective from a mineral exploration perspective, 
offer the opportunity to acquire quality tenure in areas 
with good infrastructure and access to an experienced 
workforce.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013 

3

 
Review of Operations

Strengthen GBM’s executive and technical 
capabilities.

Our technical team, along with a group of specialist 
consultants, form the core of GBM’s business and is 
essential for successful mineral exploration. The Board 
believes that highly experienced and highly motivated 
people are the cornerstone for successful exploration 
and will be vital in realising GBM’s development and 
growth plans in the coming years. The intellectual 
capacity to identify opportunities to apply new 
technology in exploration, mining and processing will 
provide GBM with sound growth options.

Maximising in-ground exploration expenditure.

GBM continues to operate from a small exploration base 
in regional Victoria, minimising company overheads.

2.0  Introduction

GBM listed on the ASX in 2007 and now holds an 
extensive portfolio of mineral exploration tenements 
including licences and applications covering an area of 

greater than 5,176 square kilometres in project areas in 
Queensland and Victoria. Exploration remains focussed 
on the discovery of significant gold and copper-gold 
deposits. The combination of location in prospective 
mineral provinces, high quality targets, innovative 
technology and a high level of exploration activity, 
provide GBM with excellent prospects for the discovery 
of one or more world class deposits within this high 
quality tenement package.

The acquisition of a 40% stake in the Lubuk Mandi 
Gold Project in Peninsular Malaysia re-enforces GBM’s 
commitment to development and early production, and 
also marks a willingness to move outside Australia when 
the right opportunity is identified.

The completion of a revised resource, including a 
copper-uranium-molybdenite resource, and a positive 
scoping study for the Milo IOCG REE Project was 
a major milestone for the company. Based on the 
assumptions made in this study, which was released 
to ASX on 22 November 2012, Milo has the potential 
to generate pre tax between $701M (base case) to 
$1,160M (upside case) net cashflow after capital.

Figure 1: GBM Resources Project Locations.

4  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

3.0  Exploration Expenditure and Assets

In the year to 30 June 2013, GBM has completed 
drilling programs in Queensland on the FC4S prospect 
(Mt Margaret), Bronzewing Bore and Boomerang 
Bore prospects (Bungalien), Chumvale prospect 
(Brightlands) along with the completion of a scout drill 
hole on the Landing Ground prospect (Grassy Bore) 
which commenced in June 2012. A total of 5 diamond 
drillholes, 3 reverse circulation drill holes, 2 reverse 
circulation pre-collared diamond holes and 2 diamond 
holes with rotary mud pre-collar have been completed 
for totals of 414 metres of RC, 4,408metres of diamond 
core and 228 metres of rotary mud respectively.

Soil sampling has been completed at the Milo South 
prospect (Brightlands), Smelter Return and Oakey Creek 
prospects (Mt Morgan), Malbon2 prospect (EPM 18208), 
FC2 and FC12 prospects (Mt Margaret) and Anomalies 
E, B, H, I, D, G and F in the Willaura region for a total of 
1,014 soil samples and 3001 MMI samples. Rock chip 
sampling was undertaken at Oakey Creek and Smelter 
Return for a total of 199 rock chip samples. A significant 
database relating to these tenements continues to grow 
as new tenements are acquired and data becomes 
available.

Total exploration expenditure on the Company’s 
tenements for 2013 was $5.8 million (including $3.5 
million of farm-in funding) compared to a total of $6.9 
million in the 2012 financial year. GBM’s exploration 
budget has maintained a growth trend since listing – 
reflecting the strength of GBM’s exploration targets. 
During 2013, activity has seen significant advancement 
of the Milo project, stronger focus on gold and continued 
strong support from our farm-in partners in other projects 
in the Cloncurry Region under the $55m exploration 
‘Farm-in’ Agreement between GBM and the Japanese 
companies Pan Pacific Copper and Mitsui Corporation.

GBM’s portfolio of mineral exploration assets includes 
two inferred resources; the Milo IOCG REEYU Project 
with 187Mt containing 113,000t of REEYO and the 

Drilling of tailings dam at Lubuk Mandi in Malaysia.

Malmsbury Gold Project with 800,000t containing 
over 100,000 ounces of Au. In addition a number of 
prospects are essentially ready for drilling with well 
defined targets based on geology, geochemistry and 
geophysics suggesting that further resource additions 
are likely.

GBM’s exploration portfolio has evolved significantly 
this year with further progress from targets that are 
essentially at conceptual or geological stage to those 
with strong results or resources moving closer to 
development. In addition, geological and geochemical 
data collected in the Milo area support the existence 
of a large mineralising system with potential to host 
significant additional resources. The Company remains 
committed to maximising the ‘in-ground’ component 
of its exploration funding as a means of increasing the 
likelihood of further resource additions.

Figure 2: GBM annual exploration summary.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013 

5

 
Review of Operations

4.0  Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine Malaysia

GBM announced on 11 June 2013 that it had entered 
a binding agreement to acquire a 40% interest in Anka 
Alamjaya Sdn Bhd, a sole purpose Malaysian company 
which owns mining rights to the Lubuk Mandi Gold 
Project in Malaysia. This agreement was ratified at a 
meeting of GBM shareholders on 22 July  2013. Lubuk 
Mandi is located approximately 2 kilometres from the 
coast near Kuala Terengganu in Terengganu State, 
Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysia has a long history of 
mining, a skilled workforce and stable government.

The Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine operated as an open cut 
mine between 1993 and 1999 with recorded production 
of 108,000 ounces of gold. While gold has been known 
in Terengganu for centuries, alluvial mining at Lubuk 
Mandi appears to have only commenced in 1989, 
and virtually no modern exploration for gold has been 
conducted in this region which is now recognised as 
part of a new gold belt in Malaysia. Following completion 
of a due diligence study and compilation of a Project 
Development Plan in May, GBM has identified three 
main exploration targets**:

n 

Tailings dams containing a target of between 1Mt 
at 0.7 g/t Au containing 23,000 ounces of gold 
and 1.4Mt at 0.9 g/t Au containing 38,000 ounces 
of gold.

n  Main Zone hosting a target of between 370,000 
t averaging 2.9 g/t Au containing 35,000 ounces 
of gold and 1,100,000 t averaging 3.6 g/t Au 
containing 127,000 ounces of gold.

n  East Zone target of between 1,440,000 t averaging 
2.5 g/t Au containing 116,000 ounces of gold 
and 2,400,000 t averaging 3.6 g/t Au containing 
280,000 ounces of gold.

Figure 3: satellite image of current day Lubuk Mandi 
Mine Site showing lease outlines in red.

Dendritic native gold in quartz from Lubuk Mandi. 
Sample M446 (field of view approx 5mm)  
Henney et al 1994 pp33, Characterisation of Gold 
from Lubuk Mandi, British Geological Survey 
Technical Report WC94021.

Figure 4: Lubuk Mandi mine layout plan 
showing exploration target locations.

6  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Based on a review of available data, the potential early 
route to gold production from Lubuk Mandi is through 
retreatment of tailings followed by recommencement 
of hardrock mining should resources and reserves 
be defined though appropriate testing programmes. 
A preliminary exploration and resource definition 
programme has been designed and budgeted for all 
three potential ore sources.

Review of available information has allowed a conceptual 
process flowchart for tailings treatment to be developed. 
If confirmed by metallurgical testwork, this would involve 
reclaim of tailings from the tailings storage facility on 
site, regrinding, flotation and sale of concentrate for final 
gold production.

At the time of writing drilling and metallurgical testwork 
on the tailings dam was in progress.

**It should be noted that this is an exploration target only, 
potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, 
there has been insufficient exploration to define an 
Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration 
will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.

5.0  Milo IOCG REE Project

The Milo Project on Brightlands EPM14416 is located 
due east of Mount Isa, and just 20 kilometres west 
of Cloncurry on the Barkley Highway, far northwest 
Queensland.

The mineralization is hosted in a northwest striking, 
highly brecciated and altered rock coincident with 
magnetic highs within a broader magnetic low anomaly 
that has been interpreted as a possible buried granite 
source for the IOCG & REE mineralisation. The REE 
and yttrium mineralisation (REEY) appears to overprint 
and envelope the IOCG style Cu-Au-Ag-Mo-U-Co 
mineralisation. Drilling shows that the mineralization dips 
steeply to the east, is possibly fault related, and that 
higher grade copper mineralization plunges to the north. 
The mineralization at Milo is considered to be closely 
linked to the Cloncurry Flexure, a deep structural feature 
in the region.

A total of 32 drillholes have been drilled on Milo so far, 
with each phase of drilling extending the main resource 
to the north and south. The drilling has delineated 
continuous Cu and REE mineralization over a strike 
length of 1 kilometre and up to 200 metres wide. 
The resource is still open-ended to the north, south 
and at depth.

Figure 5: Milo conceptual pit outline over soil geochemistry highlighting the location  
of additional high priority target area to the west of the known deposit.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013 

7

 
Review of Operations

The drilling program intersected some high grade Cu 
mineralisation including 2 metres @ 6.19% Cu at 163 
metres downhole in MIL015, one of the most southern 
drilled holes.

A total of 1594 soil samples and 295 rock samples have 
been collected on the Milo prospect to date. From the 
data collected it is possible that the total strike length 
of the Milo mineralisation could extend for up to two 
kilometres.

Soil sampling identified a number of soil geochemical 
anomalies within the Milo Prospect area. A number of 
parallel zones of coincident Cu-Au-La soil anomalism 
have been defined adjacent to drillhole BTD014 where 
peak downhole grades of 4,550 ppm Cu, 650ppm La, 
and 0.7 ppm Au were returned. It is likely that these 
anomalous zones will extend further with additional soil 
sampling, that they may be structurally related, and that 
drill testing may discover new mineralisation. Additionally, 
there is a large Cu-La soil geochemical anomaly west 
of the Milo prospect that returned peak assay results 
of 1.44% Cu, 0.35 ppm Au, and 120 ppm La that is 
associated with a coincident strong magnetic and 
topographic high.

The Milo mineralisation is still open-ended to the north, 
south and at depth. Further soil sampling and follow-
up drilling will be required to determine the extent of 
mineralization.

Milo Scoping Study
The in-depth study released by GBM in November 2012 
highlighted that Milo has the potential to become a 
mid-tier producer of rare earth oxide products with key 
credits for copper, phosphate and uranium. Average 
annual production of key commodities is estimated 
to be: 3,500t of TREEYO products, 5,300t of copper, 
173,000t of phosphate P205 (35%) and 927,000 lbs. 
of uranium U3O8.

Key outcomes of the scoping study are:

n  A maiden Cu-equivalent inferred JORC resource 
estimate of 88 million tonnes containing around 
97,000 tonnes of Cu and 14 million pounds of 
uranium oxide

n  A TREEYO inferred JORC resource of 176 million 

tonnes @ 620ppm and 0.75% P2O5

n  A long term net cash flow of between A$701 million 

– A$1,160 million over an 11 year mine life.

n  Mining will be a low cost conventional open-cut with 
a crushing rate of 10 Mtpa and onsite processing

n  Concentrates will be railed to Townsville and a 

scenario is that the REE concentrate can be further 
processed in Townsville to produce 99% pure REOs

n 

100% GBM owner/operator and funded

Uranium is a significant credit for the Milo Project, and 
the announcement by the Queensland Government that 
it is moving to allow the recommencement of uranium 
mining in that State is very significant for the project. 

Figure 6: Proposed Mine layout for Milo Project.

8  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

The Milo inferred resource contains over 14 Mlbs of 
U3O8 making it one of the largest undeveloped uranium 
deposits in Queensland.

The scoping study was undertaken on the Milo Deposit 
by independent consulting group Mining One Pty Ltd. 
The study confirmed the potential of the Milo Project to 
be a technically and financially viable project forecast 
to have strong operating margins that could deliver 
significant cashflows over an initial 11 year mine life.

The study assumed the extraction method to be 
conventional open pit mining, with onsite processing 
facilities producing concentrates of rare earth elements 
(REE), copper (Cu) and phosphate rock (P2O5) with 
relatively minor quantities of silver (Ag) and gold (Au) 
bullion. The rare earth concentrates would be further 
processed to produce REE Oxide products. The 
payable commodities considered are a suite of rare 
earth elements, copper, gold, silver, molybdenum (Mo), 
uranium (U) and phosphate rock.

Core Resources Pty Ltd was contracted to develop a 
potential processing flow sheet, and calculate costs and 
recoveries based on metallurgical test work conducted 
to date. The flow sheet essentially consists of a single 
rare earth/apatite (phosphate) processing stream 
with a separate flotation circuit to produce a copper 
concentrate containing copper, gold, silver, molybdenum 
and a separate uranium product. The conceptual flow 
sheet includes downstream rare earth separation for 
upgrading the rare earth concentrate into separate rare 
earth oxides or a mixed rare earth oxide.

was sampled at largely 1 metre intervals and assayed for 
a comprehensive suite of elements.

Milo is a large IOCG breccia style deposit with a 
TREEYO-enriched halo. Base and precious metal (Cu-
Au-Ag-Mo-Co-U) mineralisation occurs as moderate to 
steeply east dipping, sulphide rich breccia zones striking 
northwest. The mineralogy of this domain includes 
massive to semi-massive pyrite with lesser amounts 
of (in order of abundance) pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite and 
sphalerite. The sulphide rich zone forms a large, well 
defined body up to 200 metres wide. Base and precious 
metal grades are variable within the sulphide rich zone.

A zone of TREEYO-P2O5 enrichment overprints and 
forms a halo to the base metal mineralisation. The REE 
zone occurs as a moderate to steeply east dipping, 
northwest striking zone with a width of 100m to 200m. 
This zone is very continuous at low grades (<200 
ppm TREEYO) and has a simple shape. The TREEYO 
(total rare earth elements and yttrium as oxides) and 
phosphate (P2O5) resource above a 300ppm TREEYO 
cutoff is estimated as 176Mt at 620ppm TREEYO and 
0.75% P2O5.
As a result of the 2012 drilling campaigns, the Inferred 
JORC resource for the REEY component of the Milo 
Project from the maiden 103 million tonnes at 760ppm 
for approximately 82,500 tonnes of TREEYO (based on a 
400ppm cut-off grade) increased to 187 million tonnes at 
610ppm for 113,360 tonnes (based on a 300ppm cut-off 
grade). This represents an 82% increase in total resource 
tonnes and a 25% increase in the total REEYO tonnes.

Milo Mineral Resources
The mineral resource estimates were based on data from 
31 holes drilled in a roughly 100m by 50m grid pattern. 
These holes total 11,572m, comprising 3,503m of RC 
drilling and 8,069m of DD drilling. Of the total, 9,878m 

During the 2013 financial year a maiden copper equivalent 
resource was announced. This inferred resource is 
estimated at a 0.1% copper equivalent cutoff as 88Mt at 
0.11% Cu, 0.04g/t Au, 1.6g/t Ag, 65ppm Mo, 130ppm 
Co and 60ppm U, containing 300Kt of CuEq metal.

cutoff 
(TREEYO 
ppm)

tonnes 
(Mt) 

TREEYO 
(ppm, t)

P2O5 
(%, t)

CeO2 
(ppm, t)

La2O3 
(ppm, t)

 Nd2O3 
(ppm, t)

Pr2O3 
(ppm, t)

Sm2O3 
(ppm, t)

 Eu2O3 
(ppm, t)

Gd2O3 
(ppm, t)

 Y2O3 
(ppm, t)

 Dy2O3 
(ppm, t)

Er2O3 
(ppm, t)

Others 
(ppm, t)

LREEO

HREEY

Grades

300

 176 

620

0.75

260

150

80

24

12

4

10

52

8

5

9

Contained Metal

 108,000   1,330,000   46,140   26,460   13,850   4,230 

 2,170 

 710 

 1,780 

 9,150 

 1,480 

 850 

 1,620

Table 1: Milo Inferred TREEYO resource, at a 300ppm TREEYO cutoff. Red designates elements assessed 
as being in critical supply by the US Dept. of Energy, Dec 2011: Critical Materials Strategy, P4.

cutoff 
(CuEQ %)

0.10

tonnes 
(Mt)

88.4

CuEQ 
(%, t)

0.34

Au 
(ppm, ozs)

0.04

Cu 
(ppm, t)

1090

Ag 
(ppm, ozs)

Mo 
(ppm/t)

1.63

65

Co 
(ppm/t)

130

U3O8 
(ppm/Mlbs)

72

 301,000 

 126,000 

 96,500 

 4,638,000 

 5,700 

 11,700 

 14.0 

Resource

Contained Metal

Table 2: Inferred copper equivalent resource (above 0.1% copper equivalent).

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013 

9

 
Review of Operations

Diamond drilling in rugged terrain at Milo IOCG Project near Cloncurry in Queensland.

This resource remains open at depth and along strike. In addition, recent geochemical surveys confirm the existence 
of a number of additional targets in the Milo area with similar geochemical signatures. In the case of the Milo West 
target, the geochemical response is more intense than the Milo area itself. These anomalies represent high priority 
targets for future exploration.

For a complete summary please refer to ASX 
announcement dated 22 November 2012, 
’Scoping Study Confirms Strong Commercial 
Opportunity at GBM’s Milo IOCG-REE Project’.

The Milo Scoping Study by its nature provides 
preliminary estimates that are not as reliable or 
certain as a Pre-feasibility or Feasibility study 
outcomes. The estimates used in the scoping 
study are subject to completion of resource drill 
out and more comprehensive studies that include, 
detailed mine designs, metallurgical testwork, site 
construction and detailed capital and operating 
cost analysis. The scoping study is designed to +/- 
40% level of accuracy.

The Scoping Study findings are not future revenue 
or operating forecasts. The study was intended to 
give shareholders and investors an indication of the 
scope and magnitude of the Milo Project

10  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Euhedral quartz and pyrite crystals in mineralised drillcore 
from the Milo Project.

3D Map

Figure 7: Milo Resource Model within preliminary open pit shell 
(red REE 100ppm resource blocks, green 0.1 CuEq resource blocks).

Figure 8: Milo proposed process flowchart.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  11

 
Review of Operations

6.0 Iron-Oxide-Copper-Gold (IOCG) Style Projects 
in the Mount Isa Region

altered mafic and igneous rocks in the basement 
containing minor Cu locally.

During 2013 the Company maintained a high level of 
activity in exploration for IOCG style deposits in the 
North West Mineral Province (Mount Isa Region) of 
Queensland. This included GBM’s scoping study of the 
emerging Milo System, and activities conducted as part 
of a major Farm In Agreement with Pan Pacific Copper 
and Mitsui (through their Australian subsidiary, Cloncurry 
Exploration and Development Pty Ltd (‘CED’)) over the 
Bungalien, Mount Margaret West, Talawanta-Grassy 
Bore and Chumvale Breccia Projects.

The Mount Isa area has a long mining history and 
supports an active and expanding mining community 
providing a close-by skilled workforce and infrastructure 
for exploration and future mining developments. The 
prospectivity of the district has been enhanced by 
discoveries made during the recent mineral exploration 
boom in the Mt Isa-Cloncurry area that are now moving 
into the development stage (i.e. Rocklands, Merlin, 
Mount Margaret deposits).

Exploration on the projects which form part of the 
Farm In Agreement with CED included extensive use of 
geophysical surveys including gravity, 2DIP, 3DIP, MT, 
and down-hole IP and EM. IOCG-style alteration and 
low-grade mineralisation was intersected in two holes 
at the Bronzewing Bore prospect that had been targeted 
via the results of a 3DIP survey. A 3D resistivity model 
created from the results of an MT survey at the same 
prospect has identified a pair of untested targets in the 
vicinity of the successful 2011 hole BNG001. Modelling 
of MT results from a survey at the FC4_South prospect 
in the Mount Margaret area has also pinpointed several 
exciting drill targets for follow up. Gravity surveys over 
the Burke Bore area in Bungalien and a number of 
Mount Margaret prospects have helped to identify a 
series of potential drill targets beneath shallow cover.

The 2012 exploration program included 5,658m of 
drilling at 5 different prospects, namely: Bronzewing 
Bore, Boomerang Bore, Chumvale, FC4S and FC2W, 
along with the completion of TGD005 in early July 
2012 on the Landing Ground prospect (which was 
included in last years’ Annual report). The drill program 
has produced further evidence of a large IOCG system 
(BNG005 in 2012) following discovery of IOCG style 
mineralisation at Bronzewing Bore (BNG001 2011) 
beneath some 350-400 metres of Cambrian Georgina 
Basin cover. This was again repeated at the Mt Margaret 
project with the discovery of very encouraging IOCG 
style mineralisation (FC4_South – MMA001 2012) just 
north of Ernest Henry Mine beneath some 60m of 
Carpentaria sediment cover. Drilling of two scout holes 
into the Landing Ground Prospect in the Grassy Bore 
tenement revealed magnetite-bearing hydrothermally-

12  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

GBM began an extensive wide-spaced Mobile Metal Ion 
(MMI) partial leach soil sampling program (1601 samples 
collected) over a number of prospects. This geochemical 
technique has the potential to detect buried sulphide 
deposits through overlying cover. The results received 
to date suggest that this will be an important tool in 
assisting identification of highly prospective areas on 
the tenements.

In summary, the multi-faceted and strategic 
exploration program has confirmed the existence of 
large mineralising systems (Bronzewing Bore Cu-Au, 
FC4_South Cu-Au) and identified potentially fertile 
hydrothermal systems (e.g. landing Ground) while 
cutting-edge geophysical surveys and soil geochemistry 
have provided a number of exciting drill targets for 
follow up.

Figure 9: Mt Isa Inlier Project Location Plan.

Open terrain in the Bronzewing Bore target area looking across 
to hills on the Fountain Gate Fault in the distance.

6.1  Brightlands Project (EPM14416, EPM18454, 
EPM18453, EPM(A)18672, EPM(A)18051)

Chumvale Prospect 
(Project is part of the CED Farm in Agreement)

The project area consists of an 8km2 block within the 
larger Brightlands tenement (EPM 14416) that is held 
by GBM Resources.

The project area covers a prominent WNW-ESE trending 
ridge of outcropping Chumvale Breccia. The Chumvale 
breccia is an extensive breccia system located along a 
WNW-ESE trending structure that is likely related to a 
similar structure running NW-SE through the Rocklands 
Cu-Au deposit to the north of the Chumvale prospect. 
Both the Chumvale prospect and the Rocklands deposit 
are located within an interpreted broad, deep-seated 
structural corridor termed the Cloncurry Flexure that 
trends NE-SW, from Ernest Henry and Great Australia 
in the east through the Milo Cu-Au-REE deposit in the 
west and on to link with the N-S trending Pilgrim Fault 
zone. The Cloncurry Flexure marks a zone of structural 
discontinuity where the fold nose of the NE trending 
Duck Creek Anticline is in presumed faulted contact with 
younger E-W trending rocks of the Tommy Creek Block 
to the north. This broad structural corridor is considered 
highly prospective for Cu-Au mineralization.

The exploration program at the Chumvale prospect 
consisted of additional rock-chip samples, an IP 
geophysical survey, a further two scout diamond drill-
holes, and a petrological study of the Zn mineralisation. 
The focus of the program was to follow-up on the 
encouraging Zn (and minor Cu and Au) intersected in 
the 2011 scout drill-holes that targeted an apparent 
steeply-dipping conductive lense coincident with the 
breccia outcrop.

The two drill-holes intersected dolomitic breccia, 
siliceous breccia, altered dolerite, pelite, and siliceous 
shale (locally jasper). Dolerite was intersected in the 

interpreted footwall of the vertical hole and confirmed 
the presence of a large mafic body along the northern 
margin of the breccia.

The assays for both holes returned highly anomalous Zn 
(15m at 3.5 % Zn in BTD045 between 10 to 25m with a 
peak assay of 5.5% Zn at 18m down hole and 16m at 
1.3 % Zn in BTD046 from 10 to 26m with peak assay of 
1.97% Zn at 16m) in the upper parts of the holes (from 
surface), whereas minor Cu occurred locally. High zinc 
values appear in the upper weathered breccia zone of 
both holes with the Zn concentration decreasing down-
hole in both BTD045 and BTD046.

6.2  Bungalien-Horse Creek Project 
(EPM17849, EPM18207, EPM18208 & EPMA25213)

(Project is part of the CED Farm In agreement)

Following the discovery of broad intervals of IOCG style 
copper mineralisation below almost 400 metres of cover 
rocks in drillhole BNG001 at Bronzewing Bore Prospect 
during 2011, significant additional geophysical surveys 
and drilling have been completed.

The Bungalien project area consists of EPM’s Bungalien 
2, Horse Creek 2, and Limestone Creek, and EPMA The 
Brothers and covers an area of 737km2 centred around 
100km southwest of Cloncurry. The Bungalien 2 and 
Horse Creek 2 tenements were granted in 2012 and 
incorporated and replaced the existing enclosed permits 
with new titles increasing the total project area.

The structural block containing the Bungalien tenements 
is bound on the west by the Pilgrim Fault zone, a major 
north-south trending fault separating Cambrian cover 
rocks in the east from outcropping Proterozoic rocks 
in the west. The eastern margin of the block is marked 
by the Overhang Shear that separates the voluminous 
felsic and mafic volcanics and quartzite of the Argylla, 
Marraba, and Mitakoodi from the slates, shales and Fe-
stones hosting the IOCG deposits along the Starra trend.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  13

 
Review of Operations

Airborne magnetic data over the Bungalien group of 
tenements shows a series of magnetic highs some 
of which are discrete and associated with gravity 
highs. These features may be caused by magnetite 
associated with copper-gold mineralisation (possibly in 
roof pendants) adjacent to evolved stocks of Wimberu 
Granite under the shallow Cambrian and younger 
sedimentary cover. Structural and/or lithological trends 
and fault intersections are also visible locally via the 
combined magnetic and regional gravity data

The main focus of exploration activities was on the 
Bronzewing Bore prospect, with smaller programs 
continued on the Malbon 2 and Boomerang Bore 
prospects, and on a new prospect area around Burke 
Bore. Work completed at Bronzewing Bore includes IP, 
EM, 2DIP and 3DIP, 3D MT, ground gravity, MMI soil 
sampling and 4 deep drill holes. In addition, 2 scout 
RC holes were drilled at Boomerang Bore.

After the successful identification of IOCG-style 
mineralization and alteration in the Bronzewing Bore 
prospect in 2011, an extensive program of geophysics 
was carried out to refine drill-targets at the prospect. 

A further 4 scout holes were drilled on targets generated 
by the combined 2011 and 2012 geophysics, and an 
MT survey and model was completed subsequent to 
the drilling.

Drill-hole BNG005, located 900m north of BNG001 
confirmed the widespread occurrence of anomalous 
Cu at the Bronzewing Bore prospect. Chalcopyrite is 
observed in the core soon after reaching basement 
at 326m down-hole until near the E.O.H at 851m. 
This represents a >500m intersection of anomalous 
Cu associated with IOCG-style alteration. It has also 
demonstrated that Cu-bearing mineralisation (with only 
minor magnetite present) occurs within the broader 
magnetic high at some distance from the magnetic 
high targeted at BNG001. BNG007 drilled in June 2013 
intersected minor chalcopyrite-bearing veins in and 
adjacent to mafic lenses within a foliated felsic host 
(volcanic or shallow intrusive).

Six holes drilled into the basement at Bronzewing Bore 
(including the 2011 drill-holes BNG001, 2, 3) have 
intersected anomalous Cu mineralisation associated with 
IOCG-style mineralisation, veining and alteration. The 
best visible intersections occur within holes BNG001 
and BNG005.

Figure 10: Inversion model of MT survey over 
Bronzewing Bore area highlighting conductive zones 
beneath the thich Cambrian cover of the Georgina 
Basin. Also showing drillhole locations and MT 
stations (crosses).

14  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Figure 11: tenement location plan showing subsurface 
interpreted geology of the Bungalien Project Area. 
Key exploration target areas in white outlines.

Core yard facility In Cloncurry.

A ground gravity survey on Burke Bore prospect 
defined six relatively discrete gravity highs. Four of 
these anomalies are coincident with, or overlapping and 
adjacent to areas of higher magnetic response and are 
thus almost certainly basement features. It is possible 
that the near-coincident magnetic and gravity highs may 
represent magnetite-bearing sulphide bodies adjacent 
to Wimberu Granite.

Trace Cu and Au were also intersected from the two 
scout drill-holes at Boomerang Bore. The granite, 
pegmatite and aplite intersected suggests that these 
are late-crystallizing, evolved and oxidized components 
of the Wimberu Granite. The magnetite content and 
presence of minor alteration supports this interpretation. 
Late phases such as this are likely to generate late-stage 
hydrothermal fluids capable of generating IOCG-style 
alteration and mineralization in the area.

6.3  Talawanta-Grassy Bore Projects 
(EPM15406, EPM15681, EPMA18290 & EPMA18291)

(Projects are part of the CED Farm in agreement)

The Talawanta-Grassy Bore project consists of two large 
granted exploration permits: EPM15406 (Talawanta) and 
EPM15681 (Grassy Bore). Talawanta is located approx. 
220kms north of Cloncurry and Grassy Bore is located 
approx. 180kms NNW of Cloncurry

Applications for additional areas have been lodged to 
include further targets and to assist in a rationalisation 
of this tenement group. The total area under licence and 
application in this project is over 640 square kilometres. 
This project is subject to a farm-in agreement with 
PPC and Mitsui Corporation.

The Talawanta and Grassy Bore tenements are located 
within the Eastern Fold Belt of the Proterozoic Mount 
Isa Inlier, lying within a north-south trending zone of 
prominent magnetism commonly associated with 
gravity highs that are believed to reflect Proterozoic 
basement features beneath ca. 300 to 650m of younger 
Carpentaria Basin cover rocks of the Georgina Basin. 
The magnetic ridges can be traced back to the Cloncurry 
area. The tenement areas have had limited previous 
drilling recorded and none on identified prominent 
magnetic centres.

GBM has conducted ground gravity surveys over areas 
of coincident or near coincident magnetic and gravity 

highs in 2010 and 2011, and drilled three scout drill-
holes into selected targets. Two scout drill holes at the 
Ibis and Ibis South prospects intersected extensive 
magnetite-bearing alteration systems and a scout 
hole at Talawanta (Happy Valley) intersected an altered 
magnetite rich gabbro.

Talawanta
A large gravity survey was completed over almost the 
entire Talawanta tenement area between 2010 and 2011. 
The gravity survey was completed at a 500m spacing 
and defined large, discrete gravity highs within a broader 
magnetic high, adjacent to a large gravity and magnetic 
low, interpreted as a granite. The large gravity highs are 
not totally coincident with the intense magnetic highs, 
indicating that the strongest gravity feature extends 
beyond the magnetic high. This could be interpreted as 
a potentially mineralised hematite-rich alteration zone 
which is part of a very large IOCG system.

The first scout drill-hole on the Talawanta tenement 
(TGD003) targeted a discrete, gravity and magnetic high, 
at the southern end (but separated from) a north-south 
trending gravity high. The gabbro returned an unusually 
high background Cu content (average 152ppm Cu from 
60 samples assayed) in representative assays from 
the hole.

Grassy Bore
Detailed ground gravity surveys were carried out in 
2010 and 2011 over a number of coincident gravity and 
magnetic highs within the Grassy Bore tenement. The 
anomalies included the Ibis and Ibis South prospects, 
and the Landing Ground prospect ca. 10km to the north. 
3D inversions of both gravity and regional magnetic data 
confirmed the existence of a very strong and discrete 
gravity and magnetic feature at both the Ibis and Ibis 
South locations.

In November 2010, GBM commenced drilling of the first 
hole at Grassy Bore, on the Ibis prospect (TGD001). 
The occurrence of the magnetite-bearing calc-silicate 
hydrothermal system associated with extensive felsic 
pegmatites was considered to be encouraging with 
respect to the potential for IOCG mineralization in the 
immediate area.

The Ibis_South prospect scout drill-hole, TGD002 
drilled in 2011 targeted a discrete coincident gravity 
and magnetic high within a north-south trending zone 
of gravity and magnetic highs.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  15

 
Review of Operations

The Mount Margaret project area tenements are located 
to the north and north-west of the Ernest Henry Cu-Au 
mine, one of the largest IOCG deposits in the Mount 
Isa Inlier. Extensive and locally detailed geophysical 
surveys (including gravity, magnetic and IP) have been 
undertaken, as well as widespread drill-testing of 
anomalies. However, much of the earlier drilling involved 
shallow holes, generally <200m in total depth. The 
development of Ernest Henry has demonstrated that 
these deposits can continue down-dip to depths of 
greater than 1000m. GBM’s exploration strategy is to 
identify areas with promising structural settings and/or 
encouraging drill results associated with near contiguous 
magnetic highs that had some scope for further 
discovery. In particular areas where further detailed 
modern geophysical surveys, in particular gravity and 
electrical geophysical techniques may be beneficial.

In very close proximity to the Mt Margaret tenements, 
less than four kilometres south from EPM 16398, 
lies Ernest Henry. Ernest Henry was discovered in 
1991 using aeromagnetics and has a global resource 
estimated at 220Mt @ 1.2% Cu and 0.4 g/t Au. The 
mineralisation is located in an ovate SSE plunging 
breccia pipe with dimensions measuring 300m by 250m. 
The breccia has been intersected at depths of 1200m 
below surface to date with consistent mineralisation 
over this entire distance.

Work completed during the year included the ongoing 
review and evaluation of existing geophysical, geological 
and drilling data over the tenements, particularly the 
large quantity of historical data at FC4S prospect. 
Fieldwork consisted of the completion of ground gravity 
regional and infill grids over target areas FC4S, FC6, 
FC2 and FC12, IP surveys at FC2, FC4S and FC6, a 
Magnetotellurics (MT) survey at FC4S as well as large 
MMI soil programs over the FC2W, FC12 and FC15 
areas and three scout drill holes on FC4S.

FC4S Prospect
The 2012 field program at FC4S confirmed the potential 
for a major discovery of IOCG-style mineralisation still 
existing within the brownfields terrain in the vicinity of 
Ernest Henry.

A number of geophysical surveys were completed at 
FC4S during 2012, primarily to confirm the integrity 
of historical data or infill areas of sparse data. These 
included three East – West IP survey lines in June, a 
ground based gravity survey comprised of 251 stations 
in August and a 48 point MT survey in October 2012.

An IP survey was carried over the FC4S prospect in 
June 2013. Three lines of IP were run over the FC4S 
prospect. The lines at FC4S were designed to infill gaps 
in the previous data, and confirm the integrity of previous 
IP survey work. The survey was also designed to test 
the north-east trending linear magnetic high along strike 

Figure 12: Talawanta and Grassy Bore tenement areas 
with GBM drillholes labelled. Interpreted regional 
cross structures in black.

The Landing Ground prospect scout drill holes TGD004 
and TGD005 drilled in 2012 were positioned within 
prominent and discrete magnetic highs located within 
a broader N-S trending magnetic high extending 
undercover to the north of known deposits. Both scout 
holes TGD004 and TGD005 on this prospect intersected 
strongly altered magnetite-rich granitic and mafic rocks.

6.4  Mount Margaret West Project (EPM16398, 
EPM16622, EPM 19834, EPMA18172 & EPMA18174)

(Project is part of the CED Farm in agreement)

The Mount Margaret West group of tenements consist 
of Mt Malakoff Ext EPM16398, Dry Creek EPM18172, 
Dry Creek Ext EPM18174, Mt Marge EPM19834 and 
Cotswold EPM16622 (all granted). EPM18172 Dry Creek 
(was granted in July 2012 for five years, consolidating 
EPM14614 Mt Margaret West and EPM16227 Mt 
Margaret West Extended (both licenses conditionally 
surrendered).

16  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

from EHM. Conductive Mesozoic cover 
rocks from above the magnetic ridge 
and east to the end of the survey lines 
were interpreted to mask any possible 
chargeability response in the basement, 
confirming the pattern observed in the 
reprocessed historic data and providing 
impetus for the MT survey in this area.

Two small infill gravity surveys were 
carried out over part of the FC4S 
prospect late June these lines filled in 
a gap in the previous sparse data, and 
confirmed previous work. The data was 
merged with state data and a number 
of gridded images were created. The 
merged image supports the presence of 
a NS-trending gravity ridge coincident 
with the ridge of high magnetic response 
which hosts the Ernest Henry Mine. 
A second discrete and untested gravity 
high exists near the eastern tenement margin.

Three holes were drilled on this prospect during the 
year, MMA001, MMA002 and MMA003. The first 
hole (MMA001) into the initial magnetic-gravity target 
intersected a broad interval of low-grade copper 
mineralisation averaging 302 ppm from near the top 
of basement to 615m. Within this zone numerous 
higher grade intervals were intersected including 12m 
@ 0.26 wt% Cu. Intense shearing and patchy red rock 
alteration observed throughout the hole shows strong 
affinities with the Ernest Henry deposit, located less 
than 4 km to the south-west of MMA001. MMA002 
encountered minor IOCG style mineralisation, and 
magnetite-rich lenses were intercepted in MMA003. 
Downhole IP surveys were then attempted on 
holes MMA001 and 2, but due to hole blockage 
only completed on MMA001. The survey provides 
chargeability and resistivity profiles through the crust 
for comparison with surface IP surveys.

MT geophysical surveys have defined two, possibly 
three, large and discrete conductivity anomalies beneath 
an area of strongly anomalous gold mineralisation 
defined by historic drilling. To date, these targets have 
not been drill tested, however both targets show 
a spatial relationship with the distribution of gold 
mineralisation.

FC2 and FC2W Prospects
Analysis of the historic geophysical and drilling data 
over the FC2 magnetic-gravity anomaly suggests the 
prospect may be prospective for Starra/Selwyn-style 
ironstone-hosted gold and copper mineralisation. Work 
on FC2 and FC2W commenced with a 2DIP resistivity 
survey initiated over the FC2 prospect in June 2012. The 
one line run over the FC2 prospect allowed confirmation 

Figure 13: FC2 MMI soil assays with magnetic anomalies (orange) 
and gravity anomalies (blue) Inversions.

of the positioning of a chargeability anomaly located 
in previous work.

A large ground gravity survey was also completed in 
August 2012. The program was designed to cover 
the area of sparse existing data coverage west of FC2 
prospect (FC2W). Three separate grids were completed; 
the main regional grid comprised of 1599 stations at 
200x200m point spacing and follow-up grids over 
two discrete gravity highs (FC2A and FC2B) in-filled 
to 100x100m point spacing.

Following analysis of the regional geophysical data, a 
program of MMI (Mobile Metal Ion) soils was undertaken 
on this prospect. A total of 296 samples were collected 
from a nominal 400x400m grid. The wide spaced grid 
produced a number of discrete gold-silver and base 
metal anomalies, two of which were chosen for further 
infill sampling at 100mx200m spacing. The anomalies 
were confirmed as linear trends up to 1km in length, 
parallel and coincident or directly adjacent to underlying 
basement geophysical features. The targets produced 
will be drill tested in the 2014 field program.

FC6 Prospect
Two 2DIP lines and a detailed gravity survey were 
undertaken over the FC6 prospect during the year. 
The IP survey was designed to confirm the east-west 
positioning of a north-south trending chargeability 
anomaly detected by WMC. The anomaly was confirmed 
and the position of the WMC anomaly corrected 
accordingly.

The FC6 gravity survey consisted of 626 gravity stations 
on 24 W-E lines with line intervals of 200m and station 
intervals of 100m. Interpretation of data from these 
surveys identified five geophysical targets within the 
FC6 prospect area.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  17

 
Review of Operations

FC12 Prospect
A detailed ground based gravity survey comprising a 
total of 796 stations on 20 lines defined a strong gravity 
high. Examination of historic drilling on this prospect 
confirmed it had missed the peak of the gravity anomaly 
by approximately 800m.

An MMI soils program was conducted over an area that 
was described as a superimposed anomalous gravity 
high and complex circular magnetic high. A total of 257 
samples were collected on a 200m grid spacing and 
400m line spacing. The MMI survey identified more 
defined and prospective geochemical targets.

FC15 Prospect
Incorporates two granted tenements, EPMs 18172 
and 18174 and the small EPM 19834 tenement.

The FC15 prospect is highlighted by an obvious large 
circular gravity high superimposed on a significant 

magnetic high showing limited prior drill testing and 
a maximum recorded basement depth of 46m. The 
mineral assemblages identified in the historical drilling 
indicate the area is potentially prospective for IOCG 
style mineralisation.

An extensive MMI soil sampling program over the greater 
FC15 prospect area was conducted by GBM during the 
year. A total of 355 samples were collected on a 200m 
grid spacing and 400m line spacing.

The MMI soils targeted a coincidentregional gravity and 
circular magnetic high anomaly in a  sparsely and shallow 
drilled area in the north of the prospect.  Also covered 
was  the moderate but irregular coincident gravity and 
magnetic anomaly to the south. In the southern end 
of the prospect, anomalous copper was evident in 
historical drill holes (up to 527ppm) but these few drill 
holes were shallow and only partially tested this area 
of the prospect.

Figure 14: Mount Margaret West tenement and target plan.

18  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

7.0  Intrusive Related and Porphyry Style 
Copper-Gold and Gold Projects

During the year GBM has made significant progress in 
the search for IRGS and Porphyry deposits, in particular 
at the Mount Morgan Project in Queensland. IRGS and 
porphyry deposit styles have previously been identified 
by GBM as being capable of delivering world class 
deposits of commodities considered to have favourable 
long term price forecasts. Such deposits are suited to 
extraction by modern, large scale mining methods.

Surface sampling and mapping activity in the Mount 
Morgan project area has resulted in the discovery of 
a new copper prospect associated with hydrothermal 
breccia, alteration and surface copper mineralisation at 
Oakey Creek, and extended a large zone of anomalous 
copper and gold with coincident porphyry-style 
hydrothermal alteration in the Smelter Return area.

At the Willaura Project in Western Victoria, application of 
Mobile Metal Ion geochemical sampling has successfully 
defined a prospective Au-Cu target associated with 
interpreted porphyry intrusive activity.

7.1  Mount Morgan Project (EPM16057, EPM17105, 
EPM17163, EPMA17734 & EPMA18366)

The Mount Morgan Project is located 40km south west 
of Rockhampton in Queensland in close proximity to 
the world class Mt Morgan Copper-Gold mine, which 
produced in excess of 8.0M ounces of gold (Au) and 
400,000 tonnes of copper (Cu) metal.

Exploration by GBM through 2013 continued intensive 
soil sampling and detailed geological mapping of 
prioritised prospects in the Mount Morgan Project Area. 
This resulted in the discovery of a new breccia style 
copper prospect at Oakey Creek.

The project area includes nine licenses (six granted) 
covering over 822 km2. Within these existing titles, 
numerous targets are defined ranging from early stage 
stream sediment anomalies to drill ready geophysical 
and geochemical targets. Exploration programs were 

Figure 15: Oakey Creek highlighting radiometric 
anomaly, copper geochemistry and breccia.

completed during the year at the Smelter Return and 
Oaky Creek Prospects.

The Mount Morgan gold-copper deposit has produced 
more gold than any other individual deposit in eastern 
Australia to date. The orebody was hosted by a 
sequence of acid volcanic rocks and sedimentary 
rocks occurring as a roof pendant (the Mount Warner 
Volcanics) in the late Middle Devonian Mount Morgan 
Trondhjemite (377 ± 5 Ma).

7.2  Malmsbury Project (EL4515 and EL5120)

GBM consider the Malmsbury Project (located in Central 
Victoria) has the potential to host a large IRGS in a 
world class gold province. This is supported by the 
large area of alteration and mineralisation associated 
with a demonstrated endowment of almost 200,000 
ounces within 200 metres of surface. IRGS systems 
are known to persist to much greater depths in 
other regions.

Core laydown area at Malmsbury in Victoria. This facility stores core from all Victorian Projects.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  19

 
Review of Operations

A major structural and geological review completed 
during 2013 has resulted to an improved interpretation 
of the Malmsbury Project area. Previous comparisons 
of the mineralogy to the nearby multi million ounce 
Fosterville Gold Mine have been further supported with 
this study noting a valid comparison of the architecture 
of the fault and reef system at Malmsbury with the 
Fosterville System which hosts over 3 million ounces of 
gold. The study also identified additional strong North 
East trending structures similar to the Leven Star Zone. 
This is supported by a reprocessed magnetic image 
which highlights a clear complex magnetic feature with 
a similar trend.

Previous exploration results at the Malmsbury Gold 
Project indicate the existence a large IRGS in a world 
class gold province. Results of an extensive soil sampling 
program completed confirm an intense geochemical 
anomaly centred over the historic workings of Belltopper 
Hill. In addition to gold, coincident anomalism in 
elements including Bismuth (a signature mineral of IRGS) 
further support the existence of a large IRGS in the 
Malmsbury Project area.

Completion of a 12 hole diamond drilling program 
during 2008 which targeted the Leven Star Zone, part 
of the Malmsbury Project, resulted in the deposit’s 
Inferred Resource increasing to 0.8 Mt at an average 
grade of 4.0 g/t Au containing 104,000 ounces of gold 
using a 2.5 g/t Au cut off grade (see table below). This 
cut off was chosen to reflect a grade, which based on 
experience is considered to be applicable to extraction 
by underground mining methods.

This resource is contained within a 450 metre section 
of the Leven Star Zone within the Drummond North 
Goldfield which has an identified strike length of over 
4,000 metres. The resource is considered open both to 
depth and along strike. Details of the parameters used 
are contained in the resource statement.

Resource 
Classification

Inferred

Tonnes 
(x103)

820

Au 
(g/t)

4.0

Au (x103 
ounces)

104

Note: Cut-off grade of 2.5g/t Au anticipated to reflect 
underground mining production costs. Sources; GBM 
Resources 2009A, GBM Resources 2009B, Allwood 2008,

Table 3: 2008 Leven Star Gold Resource Estimate

Figure 16: Mount Morgan Project tenement and target location plan showing major structural corridors.

20  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Figure 17: Malmsbury plans showing magnetic feature and major cross structures structures related to 
gold mines and resources (left) and related to gold soil geochemistry (right).

Available historical, recent exploration and mining data 
indicate a known gold endowment of 195,000 ounces of 
gold in the near surface (approximately 150 metres from 
surface) portion of the structurally controlled mineralised 
zones explored or mined to date. This endowment is 
based on mineralisation within a 2 kilometre section of 
the Drummond North Goldfield which remains open in 
all directions.

This endowment comprises 91,000 ounces of historical 
production and 104,000 ounces of the current Leven 
Star Resource. At this time, historical production from 
a number of shafts in the project area is still unknown. 
Many zones remain to be drill tested and resources 
evaluated. The current estimate of gold endowment is 
considered incomplete in the near-surface environment.

A one kilometre deep diamond drill hole was completed 
in March 2010 with assistance from the Victorian 
Government RDV grants program. Results strongly 
support the conclusion that the Malmsbury Gold Project 
is part of a large Intrusive Related Gold System (IRGS) 
centred on Belltopper Hill.

Gold in soils defines a strong anomaly at 50 ppb centred 
on the intersection of known mineralisation, but trending 
north wards to areas not previously drill tested. At low 
levels (10ppb) this anomaly is continuous over the 2.0 
kilometres covered by the initial survey and remains 
open to both the East and West. Peak value for Au was 
1600ppb. Arsenic and antimony define a very similar 

pattern to gold, both reflecting the strong structural 
controls known to operate in the area, however Sb is 
much more tightly constrained at higher concentrations, 
with the Leven Star zone displaying the largest Sb 
anomaly. Molybdenum defines a discrete ovoid pattern 
centred near the south east margin of the magnetic 
feature, and very close to the Missing Link mineralised 
zone. Values range from 1 to 33 ppm Mo. The Bismuth 
distribution pattern very closely reflects molybdenum, 
and also defines a coherent feature centred on the same 
area as the Molybdenum anomaly.

7.3  Willaura Project (EL4631 and EL5346)

The Willaura Project is located in western Victoria, east 
of the Grampians, between the towns of Lake Bolac 
and Ararat.

Application of refined geochemical sampling and 
analytical techniques has upgraded previously identified 
magnetic Anomalies I and D to drill ready.

The project area straddles one of the state’s major deep 
crustal structures, the Moysten Fault and lies within the 
Stavely Volcanic Complex, analogous to Mt Lyell and the 
Mount Read Volcanics in Tasmania. Nearby porphyry 
systems include Thursday’s Gossan (10.6MT Cu @ 
0.45% Cu open at depth and along strike), Junction 
Prospect (39m @ 3.9% Cu), and the Glenlyle Porphyry 
(sericite alteration and low grade Cu intersections from 
AC drilling).

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  21

 
Review of Operations

Figure 18: Distinct MMI soil responses for gold and 
copper over the strong basement magnetic feature 
interpreted to reflect a felsic intrusive at Anomally ‘I’.

GBM holds three granted exploration licences within the 
Willaura Project covering an area of approximately 249 
square kilometres, including the recently granted large 
lease EL5423.

The Company is targeting a large copper-gold system in 
the Stavely Grampians Zone. The Project recognises the 
prospective and under-explored nature of the Stavely – 
Grampians Zone as a potential host to intrusive related 
Cu-Au deposits of the Mount Lyell or Cadia styles. 
Discrete magnetic features covered by recent basalt 
cover offer potential for new discoveries.

Due to the extensive tertiary basalt covering much of the 
Willaura target area, modern and advanced “deep seeing” 
exploration techniques must be employed to identify 
suitable drill targets. In early 2013, a total of 605 partial 
leach Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) soil samples were collected 
from the seven magnetic anomalies identified by regional 
air magnetics (B, D, E, F, G, H & I). In conjunction with 
the MMI soil program, a 105 line km ground magnetic 
survey was completed over the Willaura magnetic targets. 
Interpretation of this data indicates an anomalous gold 
and base metal response directly above Anomaly I and 
base metals above Anomaly D.

22  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Figure 19: Willaura tenement plan showing 
location of key target areas.

Figure 20: Yea Project tenement location plan showing target locations.

7.4  Yea Project (EL5292, EL5293 & EL5347)

The Yea Project is located in central Victoria between 
the townships of Yea, Alexandra and Marysville, 
approximately 100km north-east of Melbourne.

The first drill hole completed by GBM in 2012 intersected 
Tungsten and Molybdenum mineralisation which is 
coarse grained of potentially economic grade. Monkey 
Gully is a new Tungsten Molybdenum discovery, 
and the area still retains potential for IRGS style gold 
mineralisation.

The Yea project includes three exploration licences 
EL5292 Tin Creek, EL5293 Monkey Gully and EL5347 
Rubicon which cover an area of approximately 800 
square kilometres. The project area is centred on two 
separate intrusive systems; the Black Range Granodiorite 
and the Marysville Intrusive Complex.

Recent work by GBM focussed on the Monkey Gully 
and Mumbil Mines prospects near Yea in the north-west 
of the lease area and included extensive ridge and spur 
soi  sampling, detailed ground magnetics, extensive 
soil sampling and a small diamond drilling program. 
Review of previous exploration data has also highlighted 
a number of significant geochemical and geophysical 
anomalies which represent targets for future exploration.

Logging of the two hole drill program confirmed the 
existence of a stockwork of thin quartz comprised 
of several generations of veining. Molybdenum and 
tungsten mineralisation was observed as coarse 
molybdenite and scheelite with associated pyrrhotite 
and chalcopyrite. The mineralisation is within and 

adjacent to an interpreted high temperature vein set 
consistent with observations of occasional surface 
outcrops. The peak value for tungsten was 5,030ppm 
from 166 to 167 metres and for molybdenum 1,850ppm 
from 131 to 132 metres. Copper is also anomalous 
throughout most of the hole (peak assay 784ppm Cu 
from 8 to 10m).

Results from the soil sampling indicate that the W-Mo-
Cu soil anomalism extends for at least 1,000m in a 
NW orientation across the prospect. Detailed mapping 
revealed a series of narrow parallel tonalite and dacite 
dykes in the centre of the prospect, parallel to the soil 
anomaly strike and the regional structural grain.

A program of ridge and spur soil and rock-chip sampling 
was completed in the Monkey Gully area concurrently 
with the drilling. The program was designed to test 
whether a larger IRGS system is present beneath 
Monkey Gully and the nearby existing Mumbil Au-Bi-W 
prospect. Mumbil is and trenching a zone of high-grade 
gold mineralisation defined by soil sampling located 
2km NE of Monkey Gully (within GBM’s EL5293). GBM’s 
recent work confirmed anomalous Au at the Mumbil 
prospect in tourmalinised metasediments hosting 
extensive comb quartz veining (0.67g/t Au peak) and 
anomalous Au-As-Bi in soils in the area between the 
two prospects.

The drilling results at Monkey Gully when considered 
with the extensive Au-As soil anomalism and Au-Bi in 
tourmaline-altered metasediments within the prospect 
area are considered strongly supportive of the existence 
of an IRGS in the Monkey Gully area.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  23

 
Review of Operations

8.0  Bungalien Phosphate Project

(The Company holds 100% of the Phosphate rights after 
successfully completing the 70% acquisition of the Bungalien 
Phosphate rights from Swift Venture Holdings Corporation 
on 20 December 2012.)

With P2O5 grades up to 25% in the vast and prospective 
Georgina Basin, and located adjacent to Australia’s largest 
phosphate deposit at Phosphate Hill, Bunglien Project 
remains a highly prospective area for discovery of rock 
phosphate resources.

Work on the Bungalien Phosphate project during 2011 
advanced our targets in the Georgina Basin sediments which 
overlay the Proterozoic basement and continue to emerge as 
one of the world’s major phosphate provinces with phosphate 
resources currently identified totalling over three billion tonnes.

A total of 43 shallow RC drill holes, drilled in two stages, have 
been completed by GBM on the Bungalien Phosphate project 
areas located in the Georgina Basin, southeast of Mount 
Isa in North Queensland. Results of both drilling campaigns 
are very encouraging and confirm the extent of phosphate 
prospectivity in the area.

Drilling in the Burke River area returned a peak phosphate 
value exceeding 25% P2O5 among the higher grade results 
from the 1,436 metre RC drill programmes. Results include 
many intersections of significant widths of greater than 10% 
P2O5 mineralisation. In addition, scout drill holes PRC024, 
PRC025 and PRC026 intersected phosphate mineralisation 
in new prospect areas; drill hole PRC026 intersected 7m 
@ 4.19% P2O5 in Horse Creek EPM15150, and PRC024 
intersected 9m @ 2.14% P2O5 in Limestone Creek 
EPM17849. These holes demonstrate that further substantial 
areas of these large tenements hold potential for untested 
phosphate mineralisation at shallow depths.

Figure 21: Tenement plan for Bungalien Project 
showing key phosphate target areas.  
Burke River Phosphate area is in the  
northwest of the tenement areas.

Figure 22: Burke River Phosphate Prospect drillhole plan.

24  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Monkey Gully area, part of Yea Project area in Victoria.

All of these licences and applications (see tenement 
schedule) are held 100% by the Company (or its 
wholly owned subsidiaries), however all tenements 
in the Talawanta-Grassy Bore, Mount Margaret and 
Bungalien Projects are subject to a farm-in agreement 
with Cloncurry Exploration and Development Pty. Ltd. 
(owned by Pan Pacific Copper and Mitsui Corporation). 
Application EPMA 18672 is a competing application and 
at this stage no indication of priority has been received 
by the Company.

It should be noted EPMA 19483, EPMA 19256 and 
EPMA 19255 are overlying applications encompassing 
existing, granted tenements.

In addition GBM has signed agreements with Newcrest 
to acquire EPM 14111 Mayfield2 and EPMA 19483 
Mayfield in the Mount Isa area. This is subject to the 
transfer being approved. GBM is also awaiting approval 
from the Queensland Department on transfer of 
Cotswold EPM 16622 from Newcrest to GBM.

A summary of GBM’s tenements is provided in  
Table 4 on page 28 of this report.

9.0  Tenements

GBM reviews and ranks existing tenements and 
continues to assess opportunities to add quality 
exploration targets to its portfolio by acquisition 
of new tenements. The Company currently holds 
38 tenements in nine project areas that cover a total 
area of approximately 5176 square kilometres in 
some of Australia’s most prospective mineral provinces. 
This includes 9 applications in Queensland totalling 
1,187 square kilometres.

Seven new tenements were granted during year. Two in 
the Mt Morgan region, Central Queensland (Limonite Hill 
EPM 18811 and Mt Hoopbound EPM 18812), three in 
the Mt Margaret region (Cotswold EPM 16622, Mt Marge 
EPM 19834 and Dry Creek EPM 18172)and one in the 
Bungalien region (Horsecreek2 EPM 18208), North West 
Queensland and one in the Willaura region, Victoria (Lake 
Bolac2 EL5423). In order for the granting of Horsecreek2 
EPM 18208, Horsecreek EPM 14355 and Malbon2 EPM 
14142 were conditionally surrendered. Likewise on the 
granting of Dry Creek EPM 18172, Mt Margaret West 
EPM 14614 and Mt Margaret West Ext EPM 16227 
were conditionally surrendered.

Applications that were lodged during the year include 
Mt Victoria EPMA 25177 and Lake Bolac2 EL 5423 
in the Willaura region, Central Victoria. In addition and 
Bajool EPMA 25362 in North West Queensland was 
applied for on 1 August 2013.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  25

 
Review of Operations

Abbreviations
CuEq Copper Equivalent, as defined in Note 1 below.

EM Electro Magnetic (geophysical surveys)

IP Induced Polarisation (geophysical surveys)

RC Reverse circulation drilling

REE(O) Rare Earth Elements(oxides). There are14 
rare earth elements; Lanthanum (La), Cerium (Ce), 
Praseodymium (Pr), Neodymium (Nd), Samarium 
(Sm), Europium (Eu), Gadolinium (Gd), Terbium (Tb), 
Dysprosium (Dy), Holmium (Ho), Erbium (Er), Thulium 
(Tm), Ytterbium (Yb), Lutetium (Lu) but excluding 
Promethium (Pm).

TREEY(O) Total Rare Earth element and Yttrium (oxides) 
(Yttrium (Y) is not always considered as a Rare Earth 
Element but does have many similar properties

Explanatory Notes
* Copper Equivalent calculation represents the total 
metal value for each metal, multiplied by the conversion 
factor, summed and expressed in equivalent copper 
percentage. These results are exploration results only 
and no allowance is made for recovery losses that may 
occur should mining eventually result. However it is the 
company’s opinion that elements considered here have 
a reasonable potential to be recovered. It should also 
be noted that current state and federal legislation may 
impact any potential future extraction of Uranium. Prices 
and conversion factors used are summarised below, 
rounding errors may occur.

* MMI (Mobile Metal Ion) soil samples were submitted to 
SGS laboratories in Perth for analysis. The MMI assay 
technique is a proprietary method of SGS laboratories. It 
is a partial leach assay method finishing with ICP-MS for 
a suite of 53 elements. The sampling method consists 
of down-hole composite sampling of a 15cm horizon 
consistenetly between 10cm and 25cm below surface. 
Sieving is not necessary as this technique is designed 
to analyse loosely bound skins deposited on other 
grains. Conventional soil samples were submitted to ALS 
laboratories for sieving to -80#, grinding and analyses 
either in Mount Isa by Au-AA21 and ME-ICP61 or ALS 
in Brisbane using ME-ICP41 and Au-AA23 for the Mt 
Morgan samples with over limit for Cu (>1%) by Cu-
OG46 for a suite of 35 elements.

*2 Intersections quoted are length weighted averages 
of results for individual sample intervals. Samples were 
taken at 1 metre intervals in RC drilling by multistage 
splitter and generally 1 metre intervals of half sawn core 
with maximum of 2 metres for diamond drilling. Analyses 
were completed by Amdel in Adelaide using IC2M and 
IC2E and Au by FA1, ALS in Mt Isa for all elements other 
than gold by ME-MS61, over limit Cu (>1%) by Cu-OG46 
and Zn (>10000 ppm) by Zn-OG62 and Au by Au-AA25 
in Brisbane.

The information in this report that relates to Mineral 
Resources (Milo & Malmsbury) is based on information 
compiled by Kerrin Allwood, who is a Member or Fellow 
of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 
Mr Allwood is a full-time employee of the Geomodelling 
Pty. Ltd a New Zealand based consultancy. Mr Allwood 
has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of 
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration 
and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a 
Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the 
‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, 
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Allwood 
consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters 
based on his information in the form and context in 
which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Mineral 
Resources and Exploration Results is based on 
information compiled by Neil Norris, who is a Member of 
The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr 
Norris is a full-time employee of the company. Mr Norris 
has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of 
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration 
and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify 
as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition 
of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration 
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Norris 
consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters 
based on his information in the form and context in 
which it appears.

Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this report, including, 
without limitation, those concerning the Milo Scoping 
Study, contain or comprise certain forward-looking 
statements regarding GBM Resources Limited’s 
exploration operations, economic performance and 
financial condition. Although GBM believes that 
the expectations reflected in such forward-looking 
statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given 
that such expectations will prove to have been correct. 
Accordingly, results could differ materially from those 
set out in the forward-looking statements as a result 
of, among other factors, changes in economic and 
market conditions, success of business and operating 
initiatives, changes in the regulatory environment and 
other government actions, fluctuations in metals prices 
and exchange rates and business and operational risk 
management. GBM undertakes no obligation to update 
publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking 
statements to reflect events or circumstances after 
today’s date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated 
events.

26  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Sustainable Development

GBM Resources Ltd value the safety and health of all of its employees, contracting partners, site visitors and 
the wider community in which they operate, and are committed to a ‘zero harm’ philosophy relating to safety 
performance in all areas of the company’s businesses. The Occupational Health and Safety Management System 
is aligned to the AS/NZS 4801:2001 standard which provides a framework for industry best practice operations. 
As standard practice, the Companies:

n  Do not compromise on health and safety standards;

n 

n 

Include health and safety considerations in planning work;

Identify, assess, mitigate and manage risks;

n  Ensure work meets relevant standards and codes of practices;

n  Develop, engage and empower employees and contractors;

n  Set measurable objectives and targets aimed at continuous improvement and eliminating work related illness;

n  Collaborate and communicate with employees with respect to all health and safety endeavours; and

n  Maintain a health and safety system based on best industry standards.

Through the above practices, an exceptional level of safety performance at GBM Resources Ltd has been achieved. 
The current 12-month rolling total lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) is 0.0, based on combined GBM and 
contracting partners’ working hours (41,562.55). This compares to the 2011 average LTIFR published by Safe Work 
Australia for the Exploration sector of 3.9.

GBM is committed to safe and responsible development of Australia’s mineral resources
The Company’s continued focus on safety has resulted in improved safety performance during the year with no LTI’s 
recored. GBM strongly believes that the health and safety of personnel and the environment in which we operate 
are of the highest priority in all of our operations.

Safety & Training
A range of training programmes was completed throughout the year as part of the Company’s commitment to the 
safety of our people. GBM remains committed to a process of continuous improvement of its standards procedures 
and work practices.

Training completed during 2012/2013 included Job Safety Analysis, First Aid and Niton training.

Community & Environment
GBM is committed to working with the communities in which we operate with the aim of reducing our Environmental 
impact whilst achieving mutually acceptable rehabilitation outcomes.

GBM will identify and show consideration for the rights, beliefs and concerns of relevant landholders and all other 
parties that have a legitimate interest in our exploration activities. To achieve this we will ensure that all of our 
employees and contractors are aware of their role in implementing company environmental responsibilities, policies 
and commitments.

Each exploration site undergoes a rigorous examination for the environmental aspect prior to, during and after work 
has been conducted on the site.

Statistics/Achievements
n  No lost time injuries were sustained during operations in 2012/13 (LTI frequency rate of 0.0 against an industry 

average of 3.9 in 2011)

n  One medically treated injury was sustained during operations in 2012/13

n  No significant environmental incidents were sustained in the reporting period

n  Refresher First Aid Courses were undertaken during the year for all staff members

n  Ongoing reviews of GBM’s Risk Register and procedures continued this year.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  27

 
Tenement Schedule

Project/Name

Tenement No. Owner

GBMR  
Equity Manager

Granted

Expiry

Approx 
Area (km2)

sub-
blocks/
grats

Status

EL4515
EL5120

EL4631
EL5346
EL5423

EL5293
EL5292
EL5347

VICTORIA
Malmsbury
Belltopper
Lauriston
Willaura
Lake Bolac
Willaura
Lake Bolac2
Yea
Monkey Gully
Tin Creek
Rubicon
QUEEnSLAnD
Drummond Basin
Diamond Creek
Dee Range
Dee Range
Boulder Creek
Black Range
Smelter Return
Limonite Hill
Limonite Hill East
Mt Hoopbound
Mt Victoria
Mount Isa Region
Talawanta – Grassy Bore
Talawanta
Grassy Bore
Talawanta2
Grassy Bore2
Mount Margaret
Mt Malakoff Ext
Cotswold
Mt Marge
Dry Creek
Dry Creek Ext
Brightlands
Brightlands
Brightlands West
Brightlands West Ext.
Wakeful
Highway
Bungalien
Limestone Creek
Bungalien 2
Horse Creek 2
The Brothers
Mayfield
Mayfield
Mayfield2

EPM 19193

EPM16057
EPM17105
EPM17734
EPM18366
EPM18811
EPMA19288
EPM18812
EPMA25177

EPM15406
EPM15681
EPMA19255
EPMA19256

EPM16398
EPM16622
EPM19834
EPM18172
EPM18174

EPM14416
EPMA18051
EPMA18672
EPM18454
EPM18453

EPM17849
EPM18207
EPM18208
EPMA25213

100%

GBMR

27-Jun-11

26-Jun-14

124

38

Granted

GBMR*1/Belltopper Hill
GBMR

100%
100%

GBMR
GBMR

06-Oct-05
17-Dec-08

05-Oct-13
16-Dec-13

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR*2,4/Isa Tenements
GBMR*2,4/Isa Tenements
GBMR*5/Isa Tenements
GBMR*5/Isa Tenements

GBMR*2,4/Isa Tenements
GBMR*2,4/Isa Tenements
GBMR/Isa Tenements
GBMR*5/Isa Tenements
GBMR*5/Isa Tenements

GBMR*2/Isa Brightlands
GBMR/Isa Brightlands
GBMR/Isa Brightlands
GBMR/Isa Brightlands
GBMR/Isa Brightlands

GBMR/Isa Tenements
GBMR*5/Isa Tenements
GBMR*5/Isa Tenements
GBMR/Isa Tenements

100%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

21-Mar-02
02-Jun-11
03-Dec-12

20-Mar-14
01-Jun-14
02-Dec-17

23-Mar-11
23-Mar-11
27-Feb-12

22-Mar-16
22-Mar-16
26-Feb-17

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%
100%

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

GBMR
GBMR
GBMR
GBMR

27-Sep-07
26-Mar-08
20-May-09
21-Jun-12
41234

26-Sep-14
25-Mar-15
19-May-14
20-Jun-17
43059

41116

42941

15-Jan-08
28-Sep-07

14-Jan-13
27-Sep-15

19-Oct-10
41243
41337
41103
25-Oct-11

18-Oct-15
43068
43162
42928
24-Oct-14

5-Aug-05

4-Aug-14

23-Jan-12
23-Jan-12

22-Jan-17
22-Jan-17

20-Oct-10
24-May-12
2-Aug-12

19-Oct-15
23-May-17
1-Aug-17

25
31

20
8
218

316
329
155

25
31

20
8
218

316
329
155

Granted
Granted

Granted
Granted
Granted

Granted
Granted
Granted

46
88
81
195
260
29
23
3

325
325
325
322

85
46
3
228
39

254
7
98
13
36

78
325
325
10

302
84

14
27
25
60
80
9
7
1

100
100
100
99

26
14
1
70
12

78
2
30
4
11

24
100
100
3

93
26

Granted
Granted
Granted
Granted
Granted
Appl’n
Granted
Appl’n

Renewal
Granted
Proposal
Appl’n

Granted
Granted
Granted
Granted
Granted

Granted
Proposal
Appl’n
Granted
Granted

Granted
Granted
Granted
Appl’n

Proposal
Renewal

EPMA19483
EPM14111

GBMR*5/Isa Tenements
GBMR*2,4/Isa Tenements

100%
100%

GBMR
GBMR

9-Aug-05

8-Aug-11

Note  *1 subject to a 2.5% net smelter royalty to vendors. 

*2 subject to a 2% net smelter royalty is payable to Newcrest Mining Ltd. 
*3 For Q’ld tenements, 1 sublock ~3.2km2. Underlined areas indicate the tenement is contained in new application area. 
*4 subject to approval by DME. 
*5 subject to a 2% net smelter royalty payable to Newcrest Mining Ltd. on old boundaries only.

Table 4: GBM Resources Limited tenement summary at 30 June 2013.

28  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance Statement

Introduction

Since the introduction of the ASX Corporate Governance 
Council’s Principles of Good Corporate Governance 
and Best Practice Recommendations (“ASX Guidelines” 
or “the Recommendations”), GBM Resources Limited 
(“Company”) has made it a priority to adopt systems 
of control and accountability as the basis for the 
administration of corporate governance. Some of these 
policies and procedures are summarised in this report. 
Commensurate with the spirit of the ASX Guidelines, the 
Company has followed each Recommendation where 
the Board has considered the Recommendation to be 
an appropriate benchmark for corporate governance 
practices, taking into account factors such as the 
size of the Company, the Board, resources available 
and activities of the Company. Where, after due 
consideration, the Company’s corporate governance 
practices depart from the Recommendations, the Board 
has offered full disclosure of the nature of, and reason 
for, the adoption of its own practice.

The Board of the Company is committed to 
administering the policies and procedures with openness 
and integrity, pursuing the true spirit of corporate 
governance commensurate with the Company’s needs.

Further information about the Company’s corporate 
governance practices is set out on the Company’s 
website at www.gbmr.com.au. In accordance with the 
recommendations of the ASX, information published 
on the Company’s website includes:

Board Charter
Nomination Committee Charter
Remuneration Committee Charter
Audit and Risk Committee Charter
Corporate Code of Conduct
Performance Evaluation Policy
Continuous Disclosure Policy
Risk Management Policy
Guidelines for Trading in Company Securities
Shareholder Communication Strategy
Diversity Policy

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 1 
Lay Solid Foundations for Management 
and Oversight

Role of the Board of Directors
The role of the Board is to increase shareholder value 
within an appropriate framework which safeguards the 
rights and interests of the Company’s shareholders 
and ensure the Company is properly managed.

In order to fulfil this role, the Board is responsible for 
the overall corporate governance of the Company 
including formulating its strategic direction, setting 
remuneration and monitoring the performance of 
Directors and executives. The Board relies on senior 
executives to assist it in approving and monitoring 
expenditure, ensuring the integrity of internal controls 
and management information systems and monitoring 
and approving financial and other reporting.

In complying with Recommendation 1.1 of the Corporate 
Governance Council, the Company has adopted a Board 
Charter which clarifies the respective roles of the Board 
and senior management and assists in decision making 
processes. A copy of the Board Charter is available on 
the Company’s website.

Board Processes
An agenda for the meetings has been determined to 
ensure certain standing information is addressed and 
other items which are relevant to reporting deadlines 
and or regular review are scheduled when appropriate. 
The agenda is regularly reviewed by the Managing 
Director and the Company Secretary.

Evaluation of Senior Executive Performance
The Company has not complied with Recommendation 
1.2 of the Corporate Governance Council. Due to 
the early stage of development of the Company it is 
difficult for quantitative measures of performance to be 
established. As the Company progresses its projects, 
the Board intends to establish appropriate evaluation 
procedures. The Chairman assesses the performance 
of the Executive Directors on an informal basis.

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 2 
Structure the Board to Add Value

Explanation for Departures from  
Best Practice Recommendations

During the Company’s 2012/2013 financial year the 
Company has sought to comply with the Corporate 
Governance Principles and the corresponding Best 
Practice Recommendations as published by the ASX 
Corporate Governance Council (“Corporate Governance 
Principles and Recommendations”) and has adopted the 
revised Principles and Recommendations taking effect 
from reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 
2008. Significant policies and details of any significant 
deviations from the principles are specified below.

Board Composition
The Constitution of the Company provides that the 
number of Directors shall not be less than three. There 
is no requirement for any share holding qualification.

The membership of the Board, its activities and 
composition is subject to periodic review. The criteria 
for determining the identification and appointment of 
a suitable candidate for the Board shall include the 
quality of the individual, background of experience and 
achievement, compatibility with other Board members, 
credibility within the scope of activities 

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  29

 
Corporate Governance Statement

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 2 
Structure the Board to Add Value (continued)

of the Company, intellectual ability to contribute to Board 
duties and physical ability to undertake Board duties 
and responsibilities.

Directors are initially appointed by the Board and 
are subject to re-election by shareholders at the next 
general meeting. In any event one third of the Directors 
are subject to re-election by shareholders at each 
general meeting.

As at 30 June 2013 the Board was comprised of four 
members, two Non-Executive and two Executive. The 
Non-Executive Directors were Mr Cameron Switzer and 
Mr Guan Huat Loh. On 2 September 2013 Mr Chiau 
Woei Lim was appointed as a Non-Executive Director. 
The skills, experience and expertise of all Directors is 
set out in the Directors’ Report.

The Board has assessed the independence of its Non-
Executive Directors in office during the period according 
to the definition contained within the ASX Corporate 
Governance Guidelines and has concluded that the two 
Non-Executive Directors, Mr Switzer and Mr Loh, met 
the recommended independence criteria. Mr Lim does 
not meet the recommended independence criteria due 
to his substantial shareholding. The Company does not 
comply with Recommendation 2.1 of the Corporate 
Governance Council.

However, the Board considers that both its structure 
and composition are appropriate given the size of the 
Company and that the interests of the Company and 
its shareholders are well met.

Independent Chairman
The Chairman is not considered to be an independent 
director as at the reporting date and as such 
Recommendation 2.2 of the Corporate Governance 
Council has not been complied with.

Roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are not 
currently exercised by different individuals, and as such 
the Company does not comply with Recommendation 
2.3 of the Corporate Governance Council.

Nomination Committee
The Board does not have a separate Nomination 
Committee comprising of a majority of independent 
Directors and as such does not comply with 
Recommendation 2.4 of the Corporate Governance 
Council. The selection and appointment process 
for Directors is carried out by the full Board. The 
Board considers that given the importance of Board 
composition it is appropriate that all members of the 
Board partake in such decision making. The Company 
has adopted a Nomination Committee Charter, which 
is available for review on the Company’s website.

Evaluation of Board Performance
The Company has not to date implemented a formal 
process for the evaluation of the performance 
of the Board and as such does not comply with 
Recommendation 2.5 of the Corporate Governance 
Council. The Board is of the opinion that the competitive 
environment in which the Company operates will 
effectively provide a measure of the performance of 
the Directors. In addition the Chairman assesses the 
performance of the Board, individual directors and 
key executives on an informal basis.

Education
All Directors are encouraged to attend professional 
education courses relevant to their roles.

Independent Professional Advice 
and Access to Information
Each Director has the right to access all relevant 
information in respect of the Company and to make 
appropriate enquiries of senior management. Each 
Director has the right to seek independent professional 
advice at the Company’s expense, subject to the 
prior approval of the Chairman, which shall not be 
unreasonably withheld.

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 3 
Promote Ethical and Responsible Decision Making

The Board actively promotes ethical and responsible 
decision making.

Corporate Code of Conduct
The Board has adopted a Corporate Code of 
Conduct that applies to all employees, executives and 
directors of the Company, and as such complies with 
Recommendation 3.1 of the Corporate Governance 
Council. This Code addresses expectations for conduct 
in accordance with legal requirements and agreed 
ethical standards. A copy of the Code is available 
on the Company’s website.

Guidelines for Trading in Company Securities
The Board has committed to ensuring that the Company, 
its Directors and executives comply with their legal 
obligations as well as conducting their business in a 
transparent and ethical manner. The Board has adopted 
a procedure on dealing in the Company’s securities 
by directors, officers and employees which prohibits 
dealing in the Company’s securities when those persons 
possess inside information.

The guidelines also provide that the acknowledgement 
of the Chairman or the Board should be obtained prior 
to trading. A summary of the Guidelines are available 
on the Company’s website.

The Company’s policy restricts, notwithstanding 
exceptional circumstances, the trading in Company’s 
securities by those individuals covered by the policy to 
trading windows that are open for 10 days following the

30  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 3 
Promote Ethical and Responsible Decision Making (continued)

hosting of General Meetings of the Company, the release of annual, half yearly results and quarterly reports and after 
any other public announcement on ASX.

Diversity
The Board has adopted a diversity policy that details the purpose of the policy and the employee selection and 
appointment guidelines, consistent with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Council. The Board 
believes that the adoption of an efficient diversity policy has the effect of broadening the employee recruitment 
pool, supporting employee retention, including different perspectives and is socially and economically responsible 
governance practice.

The Company employs new employees and promotes current employees on the basis of performance, ability and 
attitude. The Board is continually reviewing its practices with a focus on ensuring that the selection process at all 
levels within the organisation is formal and transparent and that the workplace environment is open, fair and tolerant.

The Company, in keeping with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Council provides the following 
information regarding the proportion of gender diversity in the organisation as at 30 June 2013:

Females employed in the Company as a whole

Females employed in the Company in senior positions

Females appointed as a Director of the Company

Proportion of female/total 
number of persons employed

2/16

1/2

0/4

The recommendations of the Corporate Governance Council relating to reporting require a Board to set measurable 
objectives for achieving diversity within the organisation, and to report against them on an annual basis. The Company 
has implemented measurable objectives as follows:

Measurable Objective

Objective Satisfied Comment

Adoption and promotion of  
a Formal Diversity Policy.

To ensure Company policies are  
consistent with and aligned with  
the goals of the Diversity Policy.

To provide flexible work and salary 
arrangements to accommodate family 
commitments, study and self-improvement 
goals, cultural traditions and other personal 
choices of current and potential employees.

To implement clear and transparent 
policies governing reward and recognition 
practices.

To provide relevant and challenging 
professional development and training 
opportunities for all employees.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The Company has adopted a formal diversity 
policy which has been made publicly available via 
the ASX and the Company’s website.

The Company’s selection, remuneration and 
promotion practices are merit based and as such 
are consistent with the goals of the Company’s 
Diversity Policy.

The Company does, where considered 
reasonable, and without prejudice, accommodate 
requests for flexible working arrangements.

The Company grants reward and promotion 
based on merit and responsibility as part of its 
annual and ongoing review processes.

The Company seeks to continually encourage 
self-improvement in all employees, irrespective of 
seniority, ability or experience, through external 
and internal training courses, regular staff 
meetings and relevant on job mentoring.

The Company has not implemented specific measurable objectives regarding the proportion of females to be 
employed within the organisation or implement requirements for a proportion of female candidates for employment 
and Board positions. The Board considers that the setting of quantitative gender based measurable targets is not 
consistent with the merit and ability based policies currently implemented by the Company.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  31

 
Corporate Governance Statement

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 3 
Promote Ethical and Responsible Decision Making 
(continued)

The Board will consider the future implementation 
of gender based diversity measurable objectives 
when more appropriate to the size and nature of the 
Company’s operations.

Continuous disclosure is discussed at all regular Board 
meetings and on an ongoing basis the Board ensures 
that all activities are reviewed with a view to the necessity 
for disclosure to security holders.

In accordance with ASX Listing Rules the Company 
Secretary is appointed as the Company’s disclosure 
officer.

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 4 
Safeguarding Integrity in Financial Reporting

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 6 
Respect the Rights of Shareholders

Audit Committee
The Board does not have a separate Audit Committee 
with a composition as suggested by Recommendations 
4.1 and 4.2 of the Corporate Governance Council, and 
as such does not comply with those recommendations. 
The full Board carries out the function of an Audit 
Committee. The Board believes that the Company is 
not of a sufficient size to warrant a separate committee 
and that the full Board is able to meet objectives of 
the best practice recommendations and discharge 
its duties in this area. The relevant experience of 
Board members is detailed in the Directors’ section 
of the Directors’ Report. The Company has adopted 
an Audit and Risk Committee Charter and as such 
complies with Recommendation 4.3 of the Corporate 
Governance Council.

Financial Reporting
The Board relies on senior executives to monitor 
the internal controls within the Company. Financial 
performance is monitored on a regular basis by the 
Managing Director who reports to the Board at the 
scheduled Board meetings.

The Board reviews the performance of the external 
auditors on an annual basis and meets with them 
during the year to review findings and assist with 
Board recommendations.

In the absence of a formal Audit Committee, Non-
Executive Directors of the Company are available for 
correspondence with the auditors of the Company.

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 5 
Make Timely and Balanced Disclosure

Continuous Disclosure
The Board is committed to the promotion of investor 
confidence by providing full and timely information 
to all security holders and market participants about 
the Company’s activities and to comply with the 
continuous disclosure requirements contained in the 
Corporations Act 2001 and the Australian Securities 
Exchange’s Listing Rules. The Company has established 
written policies and procedures, designed to ensure 
compliance with the ASX Listing Rule Requirements, in 
accordance with Recommendation 5.1 of the Corporate 
Governance Council.

Communications
The Board fully supports security holder participation 
at general meetings as well as ensuring that 
communications with security holders are effective 
and clear. This has been incorporated into a formal 
shareholder communication strategy, in accordance 
with Recommendation 6.1 of the Corporate Governance 
Council. A copy of the policy is available on the 
Company’s website.

In addition to electronic communication via the 
ASX website, the Company publishes all significant 
announcements together with all quarterly reports. 
These documents are available in both hardcopy 
on request and on the Company website at  
www.gbmr.com.au.

Shareholders are able to pose questions on the 
audit process and the financial statements directly to 
the independent auditor who attends the Company 
Annual General Meeting for that purpose.

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 7 
Recognise and Manage Risk

Risk Management Policy
The Board has adopted a risk management policy 
that sets out a framework for a system of risk 
management and internal compliance and control, 
whereby the Board delegates day-to-day management 
of risk to the Managing Director, therefore complying 
with Recommendation 7.1 of the Corporate Governance 
Council. The Board is responsible for supervising 
management’s framework of control and accountability 
systems to enable risk to be assessed and managed.

Risk Management and the Internal Control System
The Managing Director, with the assistance of senior 
management as required, has responsibility for 
identifying, assessing, treating and monitoring risks 
and reporting to the Board on risk management.

In order to implement the Company’s Risk Management 
Policy, it was considered important that the Company 
establish an internal control regime in order to:

32  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 7 
Recognise and Manage Risk (continued)

n  Assist the Company to achieve its strategic 

objectives;

n  Safeguard the assets and interests of the 
Company and its stakeholders; and

n  Ensure the accuracy and integrity of 

external reporting.

Key identified risks to the business are monitored 
on an ongoing basis as follows:

n  Business risk management

n 

n 

The Company manages its activities within budgets 
and operational and strategic plans.

Internal controls
The Board has implemented internal control 
processes typical for the Company’s size and stage 
of development. It requires the senior executives to 
ensure the proper functioning of internal controls 
and in addition it obtains advice from the external 
auditors as considered necessary.

Financial reporting
Directors approve a budget for the Company 
and regularly review performance against budget 
at Board Meetings.

n  Operations review

Members of the Board regularly visit the 
Company’s exploration project areas, reviewing 
both geological practices, and environmental 
and safety aspects of operations.

n  Environment and safety

The Company is committed to ensuring that sound 
environmental management and safety practices 
are maintained on its exploration activities.

The Company’s risk management strategy is evolving 
and will be an ongoing process and it is recognised that 
the level and extent of the strategy will develop with the 
growth and change in the Company’s activities.

Risk Reporting
As the Board has responsibility for the monitoring of risk 
management it has not required a formal report regarding 
the material risks and whether those risks are managed 
effectively therefore not complying with Recommendation 
7.2 of the Corporate Governance Council. The Board 
believes that the Company is currently effectively 
communicating its significant and material risks to the 
Board and its affairs are not of sufficient complexity to 
justify the implementation of a more formal system for 
identifying, assessing monitoring and managing risk 
in the Company.

The Company does not have an internal audit function.

Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer 
Written Statement
The Board requires the Managing Director and the 
Company Secretary provide a written statement that 
the financial statements of company present a true and 
fair view, in all material aspects, of the financial position 
and operational results and have been prepared in 
accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and 
the Corporation Act. The Board also requires that the 
Managing Director and Company Secretary provide 
sufficient assurance that the declaration is founded on a 
sound system of risk management and internal control, 
and that the system is working effectively.

The declarations have been received by the Board, in 
accordance with Recommendation 7.3 of the Corporate 
Governance Council.

Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 8 
Remunerate Fairly and Responsibly

Remuneration Committee
The Board does not have a separate Remuneration 
Committee and as such does not comply with 
Recommendations 8.1 and 8.2 of the Corporate 
Governance Council. Remuneration arrangements 
for Directors are determined by the full Board. The 
Board is also responsible for setting performance 
criteria, performance monitors, share option schemes, 
superannuation, termination and retirement entitlements, 
and professional indemnity and liability insurance cover.

The Board considers that the Company is effectively 
served by the full Board acting as a whole in 
remuneration matters, and ensures that all matters 
of remuneration continue to be decided upon in 
accordance with Corporations Act requirements, by 
ensuring that no Director participates in any deliberations 
regarding their own remuneration or related issues.

Distinguish Between Executive  
and Non-Executive Remuneration
The Company does distinguish between the remuneration 
policies of its Executive and Non-Executive Directors in 
accordance with Recommendation 8.3 of the Corporate 
Governance Council.

Executive Directors receive salary packages which may 
include performance based components, designed to 
reward and motivate, including the granting of share 
options, subject to shareholder approval and vesting 
conditions relating to continuity of engagement.

Non-Executive Directors receive fees agreed on an 
annual basis by the Board, within total Non-Executive 
remuneration limits voted upon by shareholders at 
Annual General Meetings. In the current financial year, 
no Non-Executive Director received shares or share 
options as remuneration.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  33

 
Directors’ Report

The Directors present their report together with the 
consolidated financial statements for the Company 
and its controlled entities (‘Group’) for the financial year 
ended 30 June 2013.

Directors
The names of Directors in office at any time during or 
since the end of the year are:

Peter Thompson 
B.Bus, CPA, FCIS 
Managing Director/Executive Chairman

Experience
Mr Thompson is a CPA qualified accountant and Fellow 
of Chartered Secretaries Australia. He has over 30 years 
experience in the mining industry in Australia, UK and 
South America. He has held senior roles with several 
major companies including Xstrata Plc, MIM Holdings Ltd 
and Mt Edon Gold Mines.

Since 2000, Mr Thompson has been involved in the 
development of various infrastructure projects, including 
mine and refinery expansions and establishment of 
infrastructure including roads, rail, port and power utilities.

Mr Thompson has held no other directorships of listed 
companies in the last 3 years.

Cameron Switzer 
BSc(Hons), MAusMM, MAIG 
Non-Executive Director

Experience
Mr Switzer is a geologist with over 24 years of 
experience gained in 11 countries. He has held senior 
positions with a number of major mining companies 
including Senior Project Geologist at Newcrest Mining 
Ltd’s Telfer gold mine in Western Australia and Geology 
Manager at Acacia Resources Ltd’s Union Reef Gold 
Mine in the Northern Territory. Mr Switzer was also 
Principal Geologist with MIM Exploration Ltd for seven 
years during which time he gained broad experience 
with a range of deposits and geological and operating 
environments. Mr Switzer has a strong skill base in 
Cu Au and most recently coal.

Mr Switzer has a track record in the successful 
identification of mineral deposits, highly successful 
project generation, exploration management, validation 
of resources and the subsequent commercialisation of 
resources. Mr Switzer is a geological consultant based 
in Queensland.

Mr Switzer is also the President and CEO of TSX.V listed 
entity WCB Resources Ltd, a junior explorer focussed 
in the Asia Pacific Region.

Mr Switzer has held no other directorships of listed 
companies in the last 3 years.

34  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Guan Huat (Sunny) Loh 
BBA, MBA, ACIS 
Non-Executive Director

Experience
Mr Loh is the Managing Director of Swift Venture 
Holdings Corporation, an investment Company focussed 
on investing in small to mid sized listed companies and 
resources based companies in Asia.

Mr Loh is the Vice Chairman and Board Member of 
Shanghai Fortune Capital, a professional investment 
banking firm based in Shanghai, which has a focus 
on the restructuring and disposal of state owned 
companies, as well as merger and acquisition advisory 
services.

Mr Loh has held no other directorships of listed 
companies in the last 3 years.

Chiau Woei Lim 
MBA 
Non-Executive Director (Appointed 2 September 2013)

Experience
Mr Lim is managing director and major shareholder 
of Angka Alamjaya SDN BHD (AASB) which owns the 
Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine in Malaysia. Mr Lim has a wealth 
of experience in quarrying, construction and property 
development.

He holds a MBA from Leicester University UK and 
science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering 
from Oklahoma State University, USA.

Mr Lim has held no other directorships of listed 
companies in the last 3 years.

neil norris 
BSc(Hons), MAIMM, MAIG 
Exploration Director – Executive

Experience
Mr Norris is a geologist with over 25 years’ experience 
gained in Australia and overseas. Recently he was Group 
Exploration Manager for Perseverance Corporation 
Limited and spent over ten years with Newmont 
Australia Limited holding senior positions in both mining 
and exploration areas. A key achievement was his 
development of the geological models which contributed 
to the discovery of the Phoenix ore body at Fosterville. 
Mr Norris was also involved in the discovery of the world 
class Cadia and Ridgeway deposits. Mr Norris has a 
track record in the successful identification of mineral 
deposits and his experience will greatly advance GBM’s 
exploration efforts.

Mr Norris has held no other directorships of listed 
companies in the last 3 years.

Company Secretary

Equity Securities on Issue

Kevin Hart 
FCA

Mr Hart is a Chartered Accountant and was appointed to 
the position of Company Secretary on 3 February 2010. 
He has over 20 years’ experience in accounting and the 
management and administration of public listed entities 
in the mining and exploration industry.

He is currently a partner in an advisory firm which 
specialises in the provision of company secretarial 
services to ASX listed entities.

Meetings of Directors
During the financial year, the following meetings of 
Directors (including committees) were held:

Directors’ Meetings

number Eligible 
to Attend

number 
Attended

P Thompson

C Switzer

N Norris

G Loh

8

8

8

8

8

7

8

6

Principal Activities
The principal activity of the Group during the financial 
year was gold and copper exploration in Australia.

Operating and Financial Review
During the financial year the Group’s activities were 
focussed on exploration at its IOCG style targets at 
the Brightlands Project in Queensland and for gold 
mineralisation at the Mt Morgan Gold Project in 
Queensland and Malmsbury Gold Project in Victoria. 
Full details are available in the Review of Operations 
in the Annual Report.

Operating Results
The net loss after income tax attributable to members 
of the Group for the financial year to 30 June 2013 
amounted to $1,727,043 (2012: $1,196,811).

Financial Position
At the end of the financial year, the Group had 
$1,521,888 (2012: $1,590,824) in cash on hand and 
on deposit. Carried forward exploration expenditure 
was $13,740,089 (2012: $13,202,731).

30 June 
2013

30 June 
2012

Ordinary fully paid shares

327,415,003 236,181,003

Options over 
unissued shares

– 129,493,124

Performance Share Rights

–

350,000

Ordinary Fully Paid Shares
During the year ended 30 June 2013 the Company 
issued the following ordinary fully paid shares:

n 

n 

n 

n 

n 

20,000,000 shares at 5 cents each pursuant  
to a share placement;

10,000,000 shares at 5 cents each on the 
acquisition of the remaining Bungalien phosphate 
assets not already owned by the Company;

10,884,000 shares at 5 cents each pursuant  
to a share purchase plan;

350,000 shares on the exercise of employee 
performance rights; and

50,000,000 shares at 2 cents each pursuant  
to a share placement.

Since 30 June 2013 the Company has issued 
57,779,118 shares to nominees of Angka Alamjaya Sdn 
Bhd in respect of the acquisition of a 40% interest of that 
Company, which holds the Lubuk Mandi gold project 
mining concession.

Other than the above, no shares have been issued 
between the end of the financial year and the date  
of this report.

Options over Ordinary Shares
At 30 June 2013, there were nil (2012: 129,493,124) 
options to acquire ordinary shares on issue.

During the year ended 30 June 2013, no options were 
issued pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Option 
Plan (2012: Nil).

During the year ended 30 June 2013 no options were 
issued by the Company.

During the year ended 30 June 2013 no ordinary shares 
were issued on exercise of options (2012: Nil).

There were 129,493,124 listed options (GBZOA) which 
expired unexercised during the financial year (2012: Nil).

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  35

 
Directors’ Report 

Equity Securities on Issue (continued)
Other than the following option issues, no options have 
been issued, exercised or cancelled between the end of 
the financial year and the date of this report:

n 

n 

n 

50 million options issued, exercisable at 3.5 cents 
each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to a 
share placement;

20 million options issued, exercisable at 3.5 cents 
each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to a 
corporate services agreement; and

64,746,562 options issued, exercisable at 3.5 cents 
each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to a 
priority entitlement offer closing on 13 August 2013.

Performance Share Rights
The Company’s Performance Share Rights Plan was 
approved by Shareholders at the Company’s Annual 
General Meeting held on 30 November 2010.

At 30 June 2013, there were nil (2012: 350,000) 
unvested performance share rights to acquire ordinary 
shares on issue. The 350,000 performance share 
rights on issue at 30 June 2012 vested and became 
exercisable on 31 December 2012.

During the year ended 30 June 2013, nil (2012: 
1,300,000) performance share rights were issued 
pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Performance 
Share Rights Plan to employees of the Company.

During the year ended 30 June 2013 350,000 (2012: 
1,750,000) ordinary shares were issued on the exercise 
of vested performance share rights.

There were no performance share rights cancelled due 
to cessation of employment during the financial year 
(2012: 300,000). There were no performance share 
rights lapsing on expiry date during the financial year 
(2012: Nil).

None of the performance share rights on issue entitle the 
holder to participate in any share issue of the Company 
or any other body corporate.

No performance share rights have been issued, 
exercised or cancelled between the end of the financial 
year and the date of this report.

Significant Changes in State of Affairs
Other than the following, there were no significant 
changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the 
financial year, not otherwise disclosed in this Directors’ 
Report or in the Review of Operations.

n  On 20 December 2012, the Company issued 
10,000,000 million shares to Swift Venture 
Corporation (and its nominees) to acquire the 70% 
interest in the Bungalien phosphate rights not 
already owned by the Company;

36  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

n  On 11 June 2013 the Company announced 

that it had entered into a binding terms sheet to 
acquire, subject to shareholder approval and other 
conditions precedent, a 40% interest in Angka 
Alamjaya Sdn Bhd (AASB), a Malaysian company 
which holds the mining concession over the 
historic Lubuk Mandi Gold Mine in Malaysia.

Shareholder approval for the acquisition was received 
at the Company’s General Meeting on 22 July 2013 
and the issue of 57,779,118 ordinary fully paid shares 
to acquire the 40% interest in AASB was completed 
on 30 August 2013.

Events Subsequent to Balance Date
Other than the following, there has not arisen in the 
interval between the end of the financial year and the 
date of this report any item, transaction or event of a 
material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the 
Directors of the Company to affect substantially the 
operations of the Group, the results of those operations 
or the state of affairs of the Group in subsequent 
financial years.

n  On 22 July 2013 the Company obtained 

shareholder approval to proceed with the issue of 
shares for the acquisition of the 40% interest in 
AASB and to proceed with a Priority Entitlement 
Offer of options to holders of listed GBZOA options 
that expired on 30 June 2013;

n  On 13 August 2013, the Company’s Priority 

Entitlement Offer closed with the subsequent issue 
of 64,746,562 listed options (GBZO) exercisable 
at 3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016. 
Entitlements under the offer were allotted on 
19 August 2013 and the offer was finalised with the 
issue of the shortfall options on 27 August 2013. 
Total proceeds of $323,733 were received from 
the issue of these options;

n  On 22 August 2013 the Company completed the 

issue of 50 million listed options (GBZO) exercisable 
at 3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016, 
pursuant to shareholder approval received on 
22 July 2013 and which were securities attaching to 
a share placement completed on 28 June 2013;
n  On 30 August 2013 the Company issued 20 million 
listed options (GBZO) exercisable at 3.5 cents 
each on or before 30 June 2016, to Alvito Capital 
Holdings Inc for corporate advisory and promotional 
services provided to the Company;

Events Subsequent to Balance Date 
(continued)

n  On 19 August 2013 the Company advised that it 
had completed the Acquisition and Joint Venture 
Agreement pursuant to which the Company would 
acquire a 40% interest in AASB, a Malaysian 
Company holding the mining concession for the 
Lubuk Mandi Gold Project, and enter into a joint 
venture with AASB to assess, and if positive, 
commence recommissioning of the Lubuk Mandi 
Gold Project;

On 30 August 2013 the Company completed the 
issue of 57,779,118 ordinary fully paid shares to 
nominees of AASB in respect of the acquisition; and

n  On 2 September 2013 the Company appointed 
Mr Chiau Woei Lim, Managing Director of AASB, 
to the Board as a Non-Executive Director of GBM 
Resources Limited.

Dividends
No dividends were paid during the year and the Directors 
recommend that no dividends be paid or declared for 
the financial year ended 30 June 2013.

Likely Developments and  
Expected Results of Operations
Comments on expected results of the operations of 
the Company are included in this report under the 
Review of Operations.

Disclosure of other information regarding likely 
developments in the operations of the Company in 
future financial years and the expected results of those 
operations is likely to result in unreasonable prejudice 
to the Company. Accordingly, this information has not 
been disclosed in this report.

Environmental Issues
The Group holds participating interests in a number of 
exploration tenements. The various authorities granting 
such tenements require the tenement holder to comply 
with the terms of the grant of the tenement and all 
directions given to it under those terms of the tenement. 
There have been no known breaches of the tenement 
conditions, and no such breaches have been notified 
by any government agencies during the year ended 
30 June 2013.

Remuneration Report (Audited)
The remuneration report is set out in the following 
manner:

n  Policies used to determine the nature and amount 

of remuneration
n  Details of remuneration
n  Service agreements
n  Share based compensation

Remuneration Policy
The Board of Directors is responsible for remuneration 
policies and the packages applicable to the Directors of 
the Company. Whilst the broad remuneration policy is to 
ensure that packages offered properly reflect a person’s 
duties and responsibilities and that remuneration is 
competitive and attracts, retains, and motivates people 
of the highest quality, the Board has consciously been 
focused on conserving the Company’s funds to ensure 
the maximum amount is spent on exploration and mine 
development, and this is reflected in the modest level of 
Director fees.

The policy of the Group is to offer competitive salary 
packages which provide incentive to Directors and 
executives and are designed to reward and motivate. 
Total remuneration for all Non-Executive Directors was 
voted on by shareholders, whereby it is not to exceed 
in aggregate $200,000 per annum. Non-Executive 
Directors receive fees agreed on an annual basis by 
the Board.

At the date of this report, the Company had not entered 
into any remuneration packages with Directors or 
senior executives which include performance-based 
components.

Details of Remuneration for Directors 
and Executive Officers
The remuneration of each Director of the Company 
and relevant executive officers are set out in the 
attached Table.

Remuneration levels are competitively set to attract and 
retain appropriately qualified and experienced Directors 
and senior executives. The Board of Directors obtains 
independent advice when appropriate in reviewing 
remuneration packages.

During the year, there were no senior executives who 
were employed by the Company for whom disclosure 
is required.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  37

 
 
Directors’ Report

Remuneration Report (Audited) (continued)

2013

Remuneration  
of Directors 
and Executives

P Thompson

C Switzer

N Norris

G Loh

2012

Remuneration  
of Directors 
and Executives

P Thompson

C Switzer

N Norris

Short term

Post 
Employment

Share Based 
Payments

Salary  
and fees  
$

275,229

36,000

Other  
$

–

–

Super-
annuation 
$

24,771

–

275,229

20,037

24,771

36,000

–

–

Options/
shares 
$

–

–

–

–

–

Total 
$

300,0001

36,000

320,0371

36,000

692,037

Share Based 
Payments  
as % of 
remuneration

–

–

–

–

Total Directors

622,458

20,037

49,542

1 From 1 July 2013 total remuneration payable to the Executive Directors Peter Thompson and Neil Norris has been 
reduced by $90,000 per annum as part of the Company’s cash conservation measures implemented during the 
2012/13 financial year. See disclosure relating to service agreements for further details of remuneration of executive 
directors.

Short term

Post 
Employment

Share Based 
Payments

Salary  
and fees  
$

275,230

36,000

Other  
$

–

–

Super-
annuation 
$

24,770

–

275,230

14,026

24,770

Options/
shares 
$

–

–

–

–

–

Total 
$

300,000

36,000

314,026

12,000

662,026

Share Based 
Payments  
as % of 
remuneration

–

–

–

–

G Loh (appointed 1 March 2012)

12,000

–

–

Total Directors

598,460

14,026

49,540

Options Provided as Remuneration
During the years ended 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2012 
no options have been granted and issued to Directors or 
Senior Executives of the Company.

No shares were issued to Directors or Senior Executives 
of the Company in respect of the exercise of options 
previously granted as remuneration.

Service Agreements
Remuneration and other terms of employment for the 
Managing Director and Executive Director are set out 
in Service Agreements:

Managing Director
The service agreement has a term of 12 months from 
1 July 2013. Total remuneration under the contract 
of $300,000 per annum inclusive of superannuation 
has been reduced to $210,000 per annum as part of 
the Company’s cost reduction program. The reduced 
remuneration level will remain in place until otherwise 
decided by the Board.

The Service agreement contains certain provisions 
typically found in contracts of this nature. The Company 
may terminate the Service Agreement without cause by 
providing nine months written notice to the individual 
or by making a payment in lieu of notice. The Service 
Agreement may be terminated immediately in the case 
of serious misconduct.

The Service Agreement is subject to annual review.

There is no specific cash bonus or other performance 
based compensation contemplated in the agreement. 
Long term and short term incentives, may be awarded 
subject to Board discretion.

Exploration Director
The service agreement has a term of 12 months from 
1 July 2013. Total remuneration under the contract 
of $300,000 per annum inclusive of superannuation 
has been reduced to $210,000 per annum as part of 
the Company’s cost reduction program. The reduced 
remuneration level will remain in place until otherwise 
decided by the Board. In addition the Exploration 
Director is given the use of a company vehicle.

38  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Remuneration Report (Audited) (continued)
The Service agreement contains certain provisions typically found in contracts of this nature. The Company may 
terminate the Service Agreement without cause by providing nine months written notice to the individual or by 
making a payment in lieu of notice. The Service Agreement may be terminated immediately in the case of serious 
misconduct.

The Service Agreement is subject to annual review.

There is no specific cash bonus or other performance based compensation contemplated in the agreement. 
Long term and short term incentives, may be awarded subject to Board discretion.

Share Based Compensation
At the date of this report the Company has not entered into any agreements with Directors or Senior Executives 
which include performance based components. Options issued to Directors are approved by shareholders and were 
not the subject of an agreement or issued subject to the satisfaction of a performance condition. Options are issued 
to provide an appropriate level of incentive using a cost effective means given the Company’s size and stage of 
development.

End of Remuneration Report

Directors’ Interests
The relevant interest of each Director in the ordinary shares and options issued by the Company as notified by the 
Directors to the Australian Securities Exchange at the date of this report, is set out in the table below.

Ordinary shares 

Director

P Thompson

C Switzer

N Norris

G Loh

C Lim (appointed 2/9/13)

Options 

Director

P Thompson

C Switzer

N Norris

G Loh

Ordinary shares 
held at 
1 July 2012

Movement 
during the 
financial year

Ordinary Shares 
held at 
30 June 2013

Ordinary shares held 
at the date of the 
Directors’ Report

9,562, 582

6,393,750

9,250,000

11,067,131

–

Options 
held at 
1 July 2012

4,937,525

4,346,875

3,093,635

300,000

300,000

300,000

9,862,582

6,693,750

9,550,000

1,820,934

12,888,065

–

–

9,862,582

6,693,750

9,550,000

13,799,377

24,077,285

Movement 
during the 
financial year1

(4,937,525)

(4,346,875)

(3,093,635)

Options 
held at 
30 June 2013

Options held at  
the date of the 
Directors’ Report

–

–

–

–

–

2,468,763

1,878,126

1,546,818

8,900,000

–

17,800,000

(17,800,000)

C Lim (appointed 2/9/13)

–

–

1 Options expired at 30 June 2013.

Loans to Directors and Executives
There were no loans entered into with Directors or executives during the financial year under review. 
Other transactions with Directors and executives are set out in Note 21 to the Financial Report.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  39

 
 
 
Directors’ Report

Indemnification and Insurance  
of Officers and Auditors
During the year, the Company paid an insurance 
premium to insure certain officers of the Company. The 
officers of the Company covered by the insurance policy 
include the Directors named in this report.

The Directors and Officers Liability insurance provides 
cover against all costs and expenses that may be 
incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that 
fall within the scope of the indemnity and that may be 
brought against the officers in their capacity as officers 
of the Company. The insurance policy does not contain 
details of the premium paid in respect of individual 
officers of the Company. Disclosure of the nature of the 
liability cover and the amount of the premium is subject 
to a confidentiality clause under the insurance policy.

Other than the above, the Group has not, during or 
since the end of the financial year, given an indemnity or 
entered an agreement to indemnify, or paid or agreed 
to pay insurance premiums for the Directors, officers or 
auditors of the Company or the controlled entity.

Proceedings on Behalf  
of the Company
No person has applied to the Court under section 
237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring 
proceedings on behalf of the Company, or to intervene 
in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, 
for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of 
the Company for all or part of those proceedings.

No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on 
behalf of the Company with leave of the Court under 
section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.

Non-Audit Services
No non-audit services were provided by the external 
auditors in respect of the current or preceding 
financial year.

Auditor’s Independence Declaration
A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as 
required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 
2001, is set out on the following page.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Dated this 27th day of September 2013

Peter Thompson 
Executive Chairman

40  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

As lead auditor for the audit of the consolidated financial report of GBM Resources Limited for the year ended 
30 June 2013, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of: 

a) 

the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit;  and 

b)  any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. 

This declaration is in respect of GBM Resources Limited and the entities it controlled during the year. 

Perth, Western Australia
27 September 2013 

L Di Giallonardo
Partner 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

20 

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

Revenue 

Consulting and professional services 
Corporate and project assessment costs 
Depreciation 
Employee benefits expense 
Employee share based payments 
Exploration expenditure written off and expensed 
Other share based payments 
Travel expenses 
Administration and other expenses 

Loss before income tax 

Income tax benefit 

Loss for the year 

Other comprehensive income 

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

Basic loss per share 
Diluted loss per share 

Note 

3 

4 
4 
13 
4 

5 

– 

6 
6 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

430,401 

447,951

(203,394) 
(179,741) 
(39,663) 
(435,636) 
(23,333) 
(1,114,163) 
– 
(130,417) 
(316,047) 

(294,136)
–
(41,992)
(480,427)
(137,167)
(212,797)
(375,400)
(94,102)
(267,433)

(2,011,993) 

(1,455,503)

284,950 

258,692

(1,727,043) 

(1,196,811)

–

(1,727,043) 

(1,196,811)

Cents 

Cents

(0.7) 
(0.7) 

(0.5)
(0.5)

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements

42  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 June 2013

Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 

Total Current Assets 

non-current assets
Trade and other receivables 
Exploration and evaluation expenditure 
Property, plant and equipment 

Total Non-current Assets 

TOTAL ASSETS 

Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 

Total Current Liabilities 

TOTAL LIABILITIES 

nET ASSETS 

Equity
Issued capital 
Option reserve 
Share based payments reserve 
Accumulated losses 

TOTAL EQUITY 

Note 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

18 
7 

7 
8 
9 

10 

11 
13 
13 
13 

1,521,888 
134,795 

1,656,683 

1,590,824
411,712

2,002,536

43,608 
13,740,089 
444,971 

40,687
13,202,731
478,561

14,228,668 

13,721,979

15,885,351 

15,724,515

446,085 

446,085 

1,435,847

1,435,847

446,085 

1,435,847

15,439,266 

14,288,668

21,118,244 
– 
– 
(5,678,978) 

18,228,936
698,146
920,638
(5,559,052)

15,439,266 

14,288,668

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  43

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

Share 
based 

Consolidated 

Note 

Issued 
capital 
$ 

Option 
reserve 
$ 

payments  Accumulated 

reserve 
$ 

losses 
$ 

Total 
$

Balance at 1 July 2011 

16,950,744 

698,146 

642,071 

(4,362,241)  13,928,720

Share based payments 

Shares issued 

Loss attributable to  
members of the Company 

Transfer to issued capital 
on exercise of 
performance rights 

13 

11 

13 

13 

70,000 

1,044,192 

– 

– 

– 

– 

442,567 

– 

– 

– 

512,567

1,044,192

– 

(1,196,811) 

(1,196,811)

164,000 

– 

(164,000) 

– 

–

Balance at 30 June 2012 

18,228,936 

698,146 

920,638 

(5,559,052)  14,288,668

Balance at 1 July 2012 

18,228,936 

698,146 

920,638 

(5,559,052)  14,288,668

Share based payments 

Shares issued 

Loss attributable to  
members of the Company 

Transfer to issued capital  
on exercise of 
performance rights 

Transfer to accumulated  
losses on expiry of options 

13 

11 

13 

13 

13 

– 

2,854,308 

– 

35,000 

– 

– 

– 

– 

(35,000) 

– 

– 

(698,146) 

(908,971) 

1,607,117 

–

–

23,333 

– 

– 

– 

23,333

2,854,308

– 

(1,727,043) 

(1,727,043)

Balance at 30 June 2013 

21,118,244 

– 

– 

(5,678,978)  15,439,266

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements

44  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

Note 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

Cash flows from operating activities
Interest received 
Research and development concession refund 
JV management fee income 
Payments to suppliers and employees 

43,743 
543,642 
383,737 
(1,151,823) 

120,663
–
325,329
(1,231,333)

Net cash flows (used in) operating activities 

18(b) 

(180,701) 

(785,341)

Cash flows from investing activities
Funds provided by JV partner under Farm-in agreement 
Payments for exploration and evaluation, 
including JV Farm-in spend 
Payments to acquire property, plant and equipment 

Net cash flows (used in) investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the issue of shares and options 
Share issue costs 

Net cash flows from financing activities 

3,528,289 

2,711,077

(5,838,058) 
(32,784) 

(6,537,696)
(39,585)

(2,342,553) 

(3,866,204)

2,544,200 
(89,882) 

1,115,000
(70,808)

2,454,318 

1,044,192

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning 
of the financial year 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end 
of the financial year 

18(a) 

18(a) 

(68,936) 

(3,607,353)

1,590,824 

5,198,177

1,521,888 

1,590,824

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

1. Statement of Significant Accounting Policies

GBM Resources Limited (‘the Company’) is a listed public company domiciled in Australia. The consolidated financial 
report of the Company for the financial year ended 30 June 2013 comprises the Company and its subsidiaries 
(together referred to as the ‘Group’).

The following is a summary of the material accounting policies adopted by the Group in the preparation of the 
financial report. The accounting policies have been consistently applied, unless otherwise stated.

a)  Basis of Preparation

The financial report is a general purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the 
requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, and Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations. The 
financial report has also been prepared on an historical cost basis, unless otherwise stated. The financial report 
is presented in Australian dollars.

Adoption of New and Revised Standards – 
Changes in accounting policies on initial application of accounting standards
In the year ended 30 June 2013, the Directors have reviewed all of the new and revised Standards and 
Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to the Group’s operations and effective for the current 
annual reporting period. It has been determined by the Directors that there is no impact, material or otherwise, 
of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations on the Group’s business and, therefore, no change is 
necessary to Group accounting policies.

The Directors have also reviewed all new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued but are not yet 
effective for the year ended 30 June 2013. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that there is 
no impact, material or otherwise, of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations on the Group’s business 
and, therefore, no change necessary to Group accounting policies.

b)  Statement of Compliance

The financial report was authorised for issue on 27 September 2013.

The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards, which include Australian equivalents to 
International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS). Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report, 
comprising the financial statements and notes thereto, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards 
(IFRS).

c)  Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of GBM Resources Limited and its 
subsidiaries as at 30 June each year (the Group). The financial statements for the subsidiaries are prepared 
for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and 
expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full. Subsidiaries 
are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated 
from the date on which the control is transferred out of the Group.

The acquisition of subsidiaries has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The 
purchase method of accounting involves allocating the cost of the business combination to the fair value of 
the assets acquired and the liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. Accordingly, 
the consolidated financial statements include the results of subsidiaries for the period from their acquisition. 
Minority interests represent the portion of profit and loss and net assets in subsidiaries not held by the Group 
and are presented separately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and within equity in the 
consolidated statement of financial position.

d)  Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the 
revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue 
is recognised:

Interest Revenue
Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the 
financial asset.

Management Fees
Revenue from farm-in management fees is recognised at the time the fees are invoiced.

46  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

1.  Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

e) 

Income Tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be 
recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount 
are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance date.

Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance date between the tax bases 
of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except:

•	 when	the	deferred	income	tax	liability	arises	from	the	initial	recognition	of	goodwill	or	of	an	asset	or	

liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, 
affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or

•	 when	the	taxable	temporary	difference	is	associated	with	investments	in	subsidiaries,	associates	or	

interests in joint ventures, and the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled 
and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax 
assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which 
the deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can 
be utilised, except:

•	 when	the	deferred	income	tax	asset	relating	to	the	deductible	temporary	difference	arises	from	the	initial	
recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of 
the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or

•	 when	the	deductible	temporary	difference	is	associated	with	investments	in	subsidiaries,	associates	or	
interests in joint ventures, in which case a deferred tax asset is only recognised to the extent that it is 
probable that the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be 
available against which the temporary difference can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance date and reduced to the extent 
that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred 
income tax asset to be utilised.

Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are re-assessed at each balance date and are recognised to the 
extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year 
when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted at the balance date.

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current 
tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity 
and the same taxation authority.

f)  Other Taxes

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:

•	 when	the	GST	incurred	on	a	purchase	of	goods	and	services	is	not	recoverable	from	the	taxation	

authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part 
of the expense item as applicable; and
receivables	and	payables,	which	are	stated	with	the	amount	of	GST	included.

•	

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables 
or payables in the consolidated statement of financial position.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  47

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

1.  Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

g)  Financing Costs

Net financing costs comprise interest payable on borrowings calculated using the effective interest method.

Borrowing costs are expensed as incurred and included in net financing costs.

h)  Leases

Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and 
rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the 
minimum lease payments, each determined at the inception of the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor 
is included in the consolidated statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation.

Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to 
achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly 
against income, unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalised in 
accordance with the general policy on borrowing costs – refer Note 1(g).

Finance leased assets are depreciated on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term, except 
where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the 
leased asset are consumed.

i)  Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and short-term deposits in the consolidated statement of financial position comprise cash at bank and in 
hand. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts 
of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

For the purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and 
cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

j) 

Trade and Other Receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30–90 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount 
less an allowance for any uncollectible amounts. An allowance for doubtful debts is made when there is 
objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect the debts. Bad debts are written off when identified.

k)  Plant and Equipment

Plant and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. 
Such cost includes the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalisation when the cost of replacing 
the parts is incurred. Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying 
amount of the plant and equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalisation.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows:

Office furniture and equipment 
Plant and equipment 
Motor Vehicles 

2.5-20 years
0-40 years
8 years

The assets’ residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, 
at each financial year end.

(i) Impairment
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date, with recoverable 
amount being estimated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may 
be impaired.

The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. 
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax 
discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the 
asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, recoverable amount is determined 
for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs, unless the asset’s value in use can be estimated to be 
close to its fair value.

An impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating units exceeds its estimated 
recoverable amount. The asset or cash-generating unit is then written down to its recoverable amount.

48  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
1.  Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

k)  Plant and Equipment (continued)

(ii) De-recognition and Disposal
An item of property, plant and equipment is de-recognised upon disposal or when no further future economic 
benefits are expected from its use or disposal.

Any gain or loss arising on de-recognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal 
proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in profit or loss in the year the asset is de-
recognised.

l) 

Investments and Other Financial Assets
Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified 
as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, 
or available-for-sale investments, as appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are 
measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable 
transactions costs. The Group determines the classification of its financial assets after initial recognition and, 
when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this designation at each financial year-end.

All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the 
Group commits to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial 
assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation 
or convention in the marketplace.

(i) Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
Financial assets classified as held for trading are included in the category ‘financial assets at fair value through 
profit or loss. Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in 
the near term. Derivatives are also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging 
instruments. Gains or losses on investments held for trading are recognised in profit or loss.

(ii) Held-to-Maturity Investments
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-
to-maturity when the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity.

Investments intended to be held for an undefined period are not included in this classification. Investments 
that are intended to be held-to-maturity, such as bonds, are subsequently measured at amortised cost. This 
cost is computed as the amount initially recognised minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative 
amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between the initially recognised amount 
and the maturity amount. This calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the 
contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums and 
discounts. For investments carried at amortised cost, gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the 
investments are de-recognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.

(iii) Loans and Receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not 
quoted in an active market. Such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. 
Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, 
as well as through the amortisation process.

(iv) Available-for-Sale Investments
Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-
sale or are not classified as any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition available-for sale 
investments are measured at fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of 
equity until the investment is derecognised or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which 
time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised in profit or loss.

The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference 
to quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the balance date. For investments with no active 
market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length 
market transactions; reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same; 
discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  49

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

1.  Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

m)  Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure

Exploration and evaluation expenditures in relation to each separate area of interest are recognised as an 
exploration and evaluation asset in the year in which they are incurred where the following conditions are satisfied:

(i) 

(ii) 

the rights to tenure of the area of interest are current; and

at least one of the following conditions is also met:

(a) 

the exploration and evaluation expenditures are expected to be recouped through successful 
development and exploration of the area of interest, or alternatively, by its sale; or

(b)  exploration and evaluation activities in the area of interest have not at the reporting date reached 

a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically 
recoverable reserves, and active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest 
are continuing.

Exploration and evaluation assets are initially measured at cost and include acquisition of rights to explore, 
studies, exploratory drilling, trenching and sampling and associated activities and an allocation of depreciation 
and amortised of assets used in exploration and evaluation activities. General and administrative costs are only 
included in the measurement of exploration and evaluation costs where they are related directly to operational 
activities in a particular area of interest.

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the 
carrying amount of an exploration and evaluation asset may exceed its recoverable amount. The recoverable 
amount of the exploration and evaluation asset (for the cash generating unit(s) to which it has been allocated 
being no larger than the relevant area of interest) is estimated to determine the extent of the impairment loss 
(if any). Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to the 
revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not 
exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for 
the asset in previous years.

Where a decision has been made to proceed with development in respect of a particular area of interest, 
the relevant exploration and evaluation asset is tested for impairment and the balance is then reclassified 
to development.

n) 

Impairment of Assets
The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any 
such indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Group makes an estimate 
of the asset’s recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell 
and its value in use and is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows 
that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets and the asset’s value in use cannot 
be estimated to be close to its fair value. In such cases the asset is tested for impairment as part of the cash-
generating unit to which it belongs. When the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds 
its recoverable amount, the asset or cash-generating unit is considered impaired and is written down to its 
recoverable amount.

In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-
tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific 
to the asset. Impairment losses relating to continuing operations are recognised in those expense categories 
consistent with the function of the impaired asset unless the asset is carried at re-valued amount (in which case 
the impairment loss is treated as a re-valuation decrease).

An assessment is also made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously 
recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the 
recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a 
change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was 
recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That 
increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, 
had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss 
unless the asset is carried at re-valued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a re-valuation increase. 
After such a reversal the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying 
amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.

50  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

1.  Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

o)  Trade and Other Payables

Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised costs and represent liabilities for goods and services 
provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes 
obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services.

p) 

Interest Bearing Liabilities
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received less directly 
attributable transaction costs.

After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost 
using the effective interest method.

Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the liabilities are de-recognised.

q)  Employee Benefits

(i) Wages, Salaries, Annual Leave and Sick Leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, annual leave and non-accumulating sick 
leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect 
of employees’ services up to the reporting date. They are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when 
the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for non-accumulating sick leave are recognised when the leave is taken and 
are measured at the rates paid or payable.

(ii) Long Service Leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the 
present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the 
reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary 
levels, experience of employee departures, and period of service. Expected future payments are discounted 
using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currencies 
that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.

r)  Share Based Payments

Equity Settled Transactions
The Group provides benefits to employees (including senior executives) of the Group in the form of share based 
payments, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (equity-settled 
transactions).

The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the 
equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value of options is determined by using a Black 
and Scholes model. Share rights are valued at the underlying market value of the ordinary shares over which 
they are granted.

In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions 
linked to the price of the shares of GBM Resources Limited (market conditions) if applicable.

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the 
period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant 
employees become fully entitled to the award (the vesting period).

The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date 
reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the Group’s best estimate of the number 
of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance 
conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant 
date. The charge or credit to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for a period represents 
the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that period.

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is only 
conditional upon a market condition.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  51

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

1.  Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

r)  Share Based Payments (continued)

If the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had 
not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value 
of the share based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee, as measured at the date 
of modification.

If an equity-settled award is cancelled, the cumulative expense recognised in respect of that award is transferred 
from its respective reserve to accumulated losses. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled 
award and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new awards 
are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.

s)  Share Capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares 
or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

t)  Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the net profit or loss attributable to members of the 
Company for the reporting period, after excluding any costs of servicing equity (other than ordinary shares 
and converting preference shares classified as ordinary shares for EPS calculation purposes), by the weighted 
average number of ordinary shares of the Company, adjusted for any bonus element.

Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the basic EPS earnings, adjusted by the after tax effect of financing costs 
associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the effect on revenues and expenses of conversion, 
by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential dilutive ordinary shares, adjusted for any 
bonus element.

u)  Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements

Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, 
including expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the Group and that are believed 
to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Accounting for capitalised mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure
The Group’s accounting policy is stated at 1(m). A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to 
determine the reasonableness of the continuing carrying forward of costs in relation to that area of interest.

Share based payments
The Group uses independent advisors to assist in valuing share based payments.

Estimates and assumptions used in these valuations are disclosed in the notes in periods when these share 
based payments are made.

52  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

2.  Financial Risk Management

The Group has exposure to a variety of risks arising from its use of financial instruments. This note presents 
information about the Group’s exposure to the specific risks, and the policies and processes for measuring and 
managing those risks. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout this financial report. The Board of 
Directors has overall responsibility for the risk management framework.

a)  Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails 
to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from transactions with customers and investments.

Trade and other receivables
The Group has no investments and the current nature of the business activity does not result in trading 
receivables. The receivables that the Group recognises through its normal course of business are short term 
in nature and the most significant (in quantity) is the receivable from the Australian Taxation Office and interest 
receivable. The risk of non recovery of receivables from this source is considered to be negligible.

Cash deposits
The Group’s primary banker is Commonwealth Bank. At balance date all operating accounts and funds held 
on deposit are with this bank. The Directors believe any risk associated with the use of only one bank is 
mitigated by its size and reputation. Except for this matter the Group currently has no significant concentrations 
of credit risk.

b)  Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The 
Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity 
to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable 
losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation.

The Group manages its liquidity risk by monitoring its cash reserves and forecast spending. Management 
is cognisant of the future demands for liquid finance resources to finance the Group’s current and future 
operations, and consideration is given to the liquid assets available to the Group before commitment is made 
to future expenditure or investment.

c)  Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and 
equity prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective 
of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, 
while optimising any return.

Currency risk
The Group is not exposed to any currency risk other than the respective functional currencies of each Company 
within the Group, the Australian dollar (AUD).

Interest rate risk
As the Group has significant interest bearing assets, the Group’s income and operating cash flows are materially 
exposed to changes in market interest rates. The assets are short term interest bearing deposits, and no 
financial instruments are employed to mitigate risk (Note 16 – Financial Instruments).

d)  Capital management

The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market 
confidence and to sustain future development of the business. The Board of Directors monitors capital 
expenditure and cash flows as mentioned in (b).

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  53

 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

3.  Revenue

Interest income 
Joint venture management fee 

4.  Expenses

Employee expenses
    Gross employee benefit expense:
    Wages and salaries 
    Directors’ fees 
    Superannuation expense 
    Other employee costs 

    Less amount allocated to exploration 

Net consolidated statement of comprehensive income 
employee benefit expense 

Depreciation expense:
    Office equipment and software 
    Site equipment 
    Motor vehicles 

Exploration costs:
    Unallocated exploration costs 
    Exploration costs written off 

Note 

9 
9 
9 

8 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

46,664 
383,737 

430,401 

2012 
$

122,622
325,329

447,951

1,668,099 
72,000 
147,137 
78,504 

1,965,740 
(1,530,104) 

1,763,943
48,000
158,475
131,919

2,102,337
(1,621,910)

435,636 

480,427

21,250 
2,083 
16,330 

39,663 

136,381 
977,782 

1,114,163 

24,385
2,083
15,524

41,992

159,310
53,487

212,797

5.  Income Tax

Income tax recognised in profit and loss

a) 
The prima facie tax benefit on the operating result is reconciled 
to the income tax provided in the financial statements as follows:

Accounting loss before income tax from continuing operations 

(2,011,993) 

(1,455,503)

Income tax benefit calculated at 30% 
Share based payments 
Capital raising costs claimed 
Exploration costs written off 
Unused tax losses and temporary differences 
    not recognised as deferred tax assets 
R&D tax concession 

Income tax (benefit) reported in the 
consolidated statement of comprehensive income 

(603,598) 
7,000 
(58,789) 
293,335 

362,052 
(284,950) 

(436,651)
153,770
(87,110)
16,046

353,945
(258,692)

(284,950) 

(258,692)

The tax rate used in the above reconciliation is the corporate tax rate of 30% payable by Australian corporate entities 
on taxable profits under Australian tax law. There has been no change in the corporate tax rate when compared with 
the previous reporting period.

54  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.  Income Tax (continued)

b)  Unrecognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
The following deferred tax assets and liabilities 
have not been brought to account:

Unrecognised deferred tax assets relate to:
    Losses available for offset against future taxable income 
    Capital raising costs 
    Accrued expenses and liabilities 

Unrecognised deferred tax liabilities relate to:
    Exploration expenditure 

Net unrecognised deferred tax asset 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

5,484,166 
130,512 
73,976 

5,688,654 

4,654,374
164,087
131,338

4,949,799

(4,122,027) 

(3,912,746)

(4,122,027) 

(3,912,746)

1,566,627 

1,037,053

The deductible temporary differences and tax losses do not expire under current tax legislation. Potential deferred 
tax assets attributable to tax losses carried forward have not been brought to account because the Directors do 
not believe it is appropriate to regard realisation of the future tax benefit as probable.

The potential future income tax benefit will only be obtained if:

(i) 

the Group derives future assessable income of a nature and an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be 
realised in accordance with Division 170 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997;

(ii) 

the Group companies continue to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law; and

(iii)  no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Group in realising the benefits.

6.  Loss Per Share

Loss used in calculation of loss per share 

(1,727,043) 

(1,196,811)

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

Basic earnings/(loss) per share 

Weighted average number of shares used 
in the calculation of earnings per share 

Cents 

Cents

(0.7) 

(0.5)

# 

#

266,121,118 

222,862,253

Options and performance share rights
Options and share rights to acquire ordinary shares granted by the Company and not exercised at the reporting date 
have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share to the extent to which they are dilutive.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

Note 

7.  Trade and Other Receivables

Current
    Amounts due from farm-in partner 
    Research and development tax concession 
    GST recoverable 
    Other debtors 

non-current
    Security and environmental bonds 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

95,129 
– 
36,118 
3,548 

134,795 

43,608 

43,608 

2012 
$

–
258,692
59,158
93,862

411,712

40,687

40,687

8.  Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure

Exploration and evaluation phase:
    Capitalised costs at the start of the financial year 
    Costs capitalised during the financial year 
    Capitalised costs written off during the financial year 

4 

13,202,731 
1,515,140 
(977,782) 

9,478,299
3,777,919
(53,487)

Capitalised costs at the end of the financial year 

13,740,089 

13,202,731

 Ultimate recoupment of exploration and evaluation expenditure carried forward is dependent on successful 
development and commercial exploitation or alternatively, sale of the respective areas.

9.  Property, Plant and Equipment

Carrying values at 30 June 2013:

Land:
    Cost 
    Depreciation 

Office equipment and software:
    Cost 
    Depreciation 

Site equipment and plant:
    Cost 
    Depreciation 

Motor vehicles:
    Cost 
    Depreciation 

Total 

56  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

308,499 
– 

308,499 

153,402 
(123,087) 

30,315 

22,545 
(6,800) 

15,745 

130,633 
(40,221) 

90,412 

444,971 

308,499
–

308,499

147,330
(101,838)

45,492

22,545
(4,717)

17,828

130,633
(23,891)

106,742

478,561

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.  Property, Plant and Equipment (continued)

Note 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

Reconciliation of movements:
Land:
    Opening net book value 
    Cost of additions 
    Disposals 
    Depreciation 

    Closing net book value 

Office equipment and software:
    Opening net book value 
    Cost of additions 
    Disposals 
    Depreciation 

    Closing net book value 

Site equipment and plant:
    Opening net book value 
    Cost of additions 
    Disposals 
    Depreciation 

    Closing net book value 

Motor vehicles:
    Opening net book value 
    Cost of additions 
    Disposals 
    Depreciation 

    Closing net book value 

Total 

10. Trade and Other Payables

Current
    Trade creditors 
    Sundry creditors and accruals 
    Employee leave liabilities 

    Advanced JV Farm-in funds unspent 

4 

4 

4 

308,499 
– 
– 
– 

308,499 

45,492 
6,073 
– 
(21,250) 

30,315 

17,828 
– 
– 
(2,083) 

15,745 

106,742 
– 
– 
(16,330) 

90,412 

444,971 

141,486 
208,012 
96,587 

446,085 
– 

446,085 

308,499
–
–
–

308,499

27,212
42,665
–
(24,385)

45,492

19,910
–
–
(2,082)

17,828

98,635
23,631
–
(15,524)

106,742

478,561

580,918
515,190
81,698

1,177,806
258,041

1,435,847

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

11.  Issued Capital

Issued capital at the balance date 

327,415,003  236,181,003 

21,118,244 

18,228,936

Issue 
price 

2013 
no. 

2012 
No. 

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

Movements in issued capital:
    On issue at the start of the year 
     Shares issued on the exercise  
    of vested performance rights 
     Shares issued on the exercise  
    of vested performance rights 

    Share placement 
     Shares issued in consideration 

    for corporate services 

    Share purchase plan 
    Share placement 
     Shares issued to acquire 

    phosphate rights 

     Shares issued on the exercise 
  of vested performance rights 

    Share placement 
    Share issue costs 

236,181,003  219,793,503 

18,228,936 

16,950,744

$0.09 

$0.10 
$0.08 

$0.10 
$0.05 
$0.05 

– 

– 
– 

1,100,000 

650,000 
13,937,500 

– 

– 
– 

99,000

65,000
1,115,000

– 
10,884,000 
20,000,000 

700,000 
– 
– 

– 
544,200 
1,000,000 

70,000
–
–

$0.05 

10,000,000 

$0.10 
$0.02 

350,000 
50,000,000 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

500,000 

–

35,000 
1,000,000 
(189,892) 

–
–
(70,808)

    On issue at the end of the reporting year 

327,415,003  236,181,003 

21,118,244 

18,228,936

Shares Subject to Restriction Agreement
At balance date there were no ordinary shares subject to any restrictions.

12. Options and Performance Rights

Details of the Company’s Incentive Option Scheme are provided at Note 14.

a)  Options over unissued shares
Options on issue at the balance date 

Movements in options:
    Options on issue at the start of the year 
     Options issued for corporate services 

    (Note 13) 

    Options cancelled on expiry 

     Options on issue at the end 

of the reporting year 

2013 
no. 

2012 
No. 

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

–  129,493,124 

– 

698,146

129,493,124  113,793,124 

698,146 

698,146

– 
(129,493,124) 

15,700,000 
– 

– 
(698,146)

–

–  129,493,124 

– 

698,146

i) Options Issued, Exercised and Expired During the Year
During the financial year the Company granted no options over unissued shares (2012: 15,700,000).
During the year, no options over unissued shares were exercised (2012: Nil).
During the year, 129,493,124 options were cancelled on expiry of their exercise term (2012: Nil).

ii) Options on Issue at the Balance Date
The number of options outstanding over unissued ordinary shares at 30 June 2013 is nil (2012: 129,493,124).

58  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. Options and Performance Rights (continued)

a)  Options over unissued shares (continued)

iii) Subsequent to the Balance Date
Other than the following option issues, no options have been issued, exercised or cancelled between the end of the 
financial year and the date of this report:

•	

•	

•	

50 million options issued, exercisable at 3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to a share 
placement;

20 million options issued, exercisable at 3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to a corporate 
services agreement; and

64,746,562 options issued, exercisable at 3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to a priority 
entitlement offer closing on 13 August 2013.

iv) Basis and assumptions used in the valuation of options granted in the period
There were no options granted during the period.

b)  Performance Share Rights
Details of the Company’s Performance Rights Plan are provided at Note 14.

Issue 
price 

2013 
no. 

2012 
No. 

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

Performance rights on issue 
at the balance date 

Movements in share rights:
     Share rights on issue at the 

    start of the year 

     Share rights issued to employees 

    during the year 

     Vested share rights exercised 

    during the year 

    Unvested share rights lapsed 

     Performance share rights on issue 
    at the end of the reporting year 

Number of vested performance share rights 
at the end of the reporting year 

– 

350,000 

350,000 

1,100,000 

Nil 

– 

1,300,000 

(350,000) 
– 

(1,750,000) 
(300,000)

– 

– 

350,000 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

–

–

–

–

–

–

i) Performance share rights Issued, Exercised and Expired during the Year
During the financial year the Company granted nil performance share rights (2012: 1,300,000)
During the year, 350,000 vested share rights were exercised into ordinary fully paid shares (2012: 1,750,000).
No unvested performance share rights were cancelled on cessation of employment (2012: 300,000).

ii) Performance share rights on Issue at the Balance Date
The number of share rights, vested unexercised and un-vested at 30 June 2013 is nil (2012: 350,000).

iii) Subsequent to the Balance Date
No share rights have been granted, exercised or cancelled subsequent to the reporting date.

iv) Basis and assumptions used in the valuation of share rights granted in the period
Share rights are valued at the underlying market value of the ordinary shares over which they are granted.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

13. Reserves and Accumulated Losses

Share based payments reserve i
    Opening balance 
    Employee share based payments – performance rights 
    Share based payments – options issued for corporate services 
    Transferred to issued capital on exercise of performance rights 
    Transferred to accumulated losses on cancellation of expired options 

    Closing balance 

Option reserve ii
    Opening balance 
    Transferred to accumulated losses on cancellation of expired options 

    Closing balance 

Accumulated Losses
    Opening balance 
    Net loss attributable to the members of the Company 
    Transferred from reserves on cancellation of expired options 

    Closing balance 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

920,638 
23,333 
– 
(35,000) 
(908,971) 

– 

698,146 
(698,146) 

– 

642,071
137,167
305,400
(164,000)
–

920,638

698,146
–

698,146

(5,559,052) 
(1,727,043) 
1,607,117 

(4,362,241)
(1,196,811)
–

(5,678,978) 

(5,559,052)

i) Share based payments reserve
The share based payments reserve represents the fair value of performance share rights and options, issued as 
consideration for services to employees or consultants as remuneration, or to third parties for the acquisition of 
assets, goods or services.

ii) Option reserve
The option reserve represents the proceeds received on the issue of options.

14. Employee Benefits

 Details of the Company’s share right and option plans, under which share rights and options are issuable to 
employees, directors and consultants are summarised below. Details of share rights and options issued to Directors 
and executives are set out in Note 20.

Incentive Option Plan
The Company has a formal option plan for the issue of options to employees, directors and consultants, which was 
approved by shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting on 30 November 2010. Options are granted 
free of charge and are exercisable at a fixed price in accordance with the terms of the grant. Options over unissued 
shares are issued under the terms of the Plan at the discretion of the Board.

There are no options on issue under the Incentive Option Plan at 30 June 2013 (2012: nil). Refer to Note 12(a).

Performance Rights Plan
The Company has a formal plan for the issue of performance share rights to employees, which was approved by 
shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting on 30 November 2010. Share rights are granted free of 
charge and are exercisable into ordinary fully paid shares in accordance with the terms of the grant. Share rights 
are issued to employees under the terms of the Plan at the discretion of the Board.

There are nil share rights on issue under the Performance Rights Plan at 30 June 2013 (2012: 350,000). 
Refer to Note 12(b).

60  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
15. Segment Reporting

Operating segments are identified and segment information disclosed, where appropriate, on the basis of internal 
reports reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors, being the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, as defined 
by AASB 8.

The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the 
Board of Directors in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources. Reportable segments 
disclosed are based on aggregating operating segments, where the segments have similar characteristics. The 
Group’s sole activity is mineral exploration and resource development wholly within its Brightlands IOCG project in 
North Queensland, and its Malmsbury Gold Project in Victoria, Australia, therefore it has aggregated all operating 
segments into the one reportable segment being mineral exploration.

The reportable segment is represented by the primary statements forming these financial statements.

16. Financial Instruments

Credit risk
The Directors do not consider that the Group’s financial assets are subject to anything more than a negligible level 
of credit risk, and as such no disclosures are made. Refer to Note 2(a).

Impairment losses
The Directors do not consider that any of the Group’s financial assets are subject to impairment at the reporting 
date. No impairment expense or reversal of impairment charge has occurred during the reporting period.

Liquidity risk
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding 
the impact of netting agreements. Refer to Note 2(b):

Consolidated 

Carrying 
amount 
$ 

Contractual 
cash flows 
$ 

6 months 
or less 
$ 

6-12 
months 
$ 

1-2 
years 
$ 

2-5 
years 
$ 

More than 
5 years 
$

30 June 2013
Trade and other payables  141,486 

141,486 

141,486 

141,486 

141,486 

141,486 

30 June 2012
Trade and other payables  580,918 

580,918 

580,918 

580,918 

580,918 

580,918 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

The Group does not have any interest bearing liabilities to report a weighted average interest rate.

Currency risk
The Group does not have any direct exposure to foreign currency risk, other than in respect of its impact on the 
economy and commodity prices generally. Refer to Note 2 (c).

Interest rate risk
At the reporting date the interest profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments were:

–

–

–

–

–

–

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

– 

– 

1,521,888 

1,521,888 

1,590,824

1,590,824

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  61

Fixed rate instruments:
    Financial liabilities 

Variable rate instruments:
    Financial assets 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

16. Financial Instruments (continued)

Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed rate investments
The Group does not account for any fixed rate financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, 
and the Group does not designate derivatives as hedging instruments under a fair value hedge accounting model. 
Therefore a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss.

Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) equity and 
profit or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant.

Profit and Loss 

Equity

100bp 
increase 
$ 

100bp 
decrease 
$ 

100bp 
increase 
$ 

100bp 
decrease 
$

15,219 

(15,219) 

15,219 

(15,219)

15,908 

(15,908) 

15,908 

(15,908)

30 June 2013
Variable rate instruments 

30 June 2012
Variable rate instruments 

Fair values

Fair values versus carrying amounts
The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities as described in the consolidated statement of financial 
position represent their estimated net fair value.

17.  Commitments

a)  Exploration
The Group has certain obligations to perform minimum exploration work on mineral leases held. These obligations 
may vary over time, depending on the Group’s exploration programmes and priorities. As at balance date, total 
exploration expenditure commitments on tenements held by the Group have not been provided for in the financial 
statements. These obligations are also subject to variations by farm-out arrangements or sale of the relevant 
tenements. This commitment does not include the expenditure commitments which are the responsibility of the 
joint venture partners.

b)  Operating Lease Commitments
The Group has no operating lease commitments.

c)  Contractual Commitment
The Group has no contractual commitments.

62  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

1,389,984 
131,904 

1,521,888 

1,465,538
125,286

1,590,824

18. Notes to the Statement of Cash Flows

a)  Cash Assets
Cash at bank and on hand 
Bank at call cash account 

Total cash and cash equivalents 

The Bank at call account holds funds at call subject to certain trading 
restrictions and pays interest at an average of 5.20% (2012:5.20%).

b) 

 Reconciliation of Loss from Ordinary Activities after 
Income Tax to net Cash Used In Operating Activities

Profit/(Loss) after income tax 

(1,727,043) 

(1,196,811)

Add (less) non-cash items:
    Depreciation 
    Share based payments 
    Exploration expenditure written off and expensed 

Changes in assets and liabilities:
    Increase/(decrease) in trade creditors and accruals 
    (Increase)/decrease in sundry receivables 
    (Increase)/decrease in research and development tax concession receivable 

Net cash flow from operations 

39,662 
23,333 
1,114,163 

18,530 
91,962 
258,692 

(180,701) 

41,992
512,567
212,797

(633)
(96,561)
(258,692)

(785,341)

During the 2013 financial year the Company issued 10,000,000 ordinary fully paid shares in consideration for 
the acquisition of the 70% Bungalien Phosphate rights from Swift Venture Corporation. The value of the shares 
amounted to $500,000.

During the 2012 financial year the Company issued 15,700,000 listed options, exercisable at 20 cents each on 
or before 30 June 2013, in consideration for corporate and public relations services to the Company. The value 
of the options granted amounted to $305,400).

During the 2012 financial year the Company issued 700,000 ordinary fully paid shares in consideration for corporate 
services to the Company. The value of the shares issued amounted to $70,000.

19. Auditor’s Remuneration

Amounts received or receivable by HLB Mann Judd for:
    Audit and review of financial reports 

27,750 

26,970

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

20. Controlled Entities

a)  Particulars in Relation to Ownership of Controlled Entities

Belltopper Hill Pty Ltd 
Syndicated Resources Pty Ltd 
Willaura Minerals Pty Ltd 
Isa Brightlands Pty Ltd 
Isa Tenements Pty Ltd 
Bungalien Phosphate Pty Ltd 

b) 

 GBM Resources Limited –  
Investments in Controlled Entities
Belltopper Hill Pty Ltd 
Syndicated Resources Pty Ltd 
Willaura Minerals Pty Ltd 
Isa Brightlands Pty Ltd 
Isa Tenements Pty Ltd 
Bungalien Phosphate Pty Ltd 

2013 
% 

100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 

$ 

596,850 
100 
– 
1 
1 
10 

596,962 

2012 
%

100
100
100
100
100
100

$

596,850
100
810,000
1
1
10

1,406,962

During the 2013 financial year the Company recognised a provision against the investment in Willaura Minerals Pty 
Ltd. The fair value of this investment had previously been recognised as fair value acquisition costs on consolidation 
in respect of the Willaura Minerals assets acquired on the Company’s initial public offer. The impairment expense has 
been included in the write off of exploration costs (Note 4).

2,204,082 
– 
– 
7,630,888 
1,368,324 
– 

(1,726,492) 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2,044,873
–
(810,000)
4,466,859
810,211
–

(1,196,811)
–
–
–
–
–
–

(1,726,492) 

(1,196,811)

c)  Loans to/(from) Controlled Entities

Belltopper Hill Pty Ltd 
Syndicated Resources Pty Ltd 
Willaura Minerals Pty Ltd 
Isa Brightlands Pty Ltd 
Isa Tenements Pty Ltd 
Bungalien Phosphate Pty Ltd 

d)  Contribution to Consolidated Result

GBM Resources Limited 
Belltopper Hill Pty Ltd 
Syndicated Resources Pty Ltd 
Willaura Minerals Pty Ltd 
Isa Brightlands Pty Ltd 
Isa Tenements Pty Ltd 
Bungalien Phosphate Pty Ltd 

Total 

64  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21. Key Management Personnel Disclosures

a)  Details of Key Management Personnel
 The following were key management personnel of the Group at any time during the year and unless otherwise 
stated were key management personnel for the entire year.

Non-Executive Directors
Cameron Switzer – Non-Executive Director
Guan Huat Loh – Non-Executive Director

Executive Directors
Peter Thompson – Managing Director
Neil Norris – Exploration Director

Total remuneration paid to key management personnel during the year:

Short-term benefits 
Post-employment benefits 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

642,495 
49,542 

692,037 

2012 
$

612,486
49,540

662,026

b)  Option Holdings of Key Management Personnel

Director 

P Thompson 
C Switzer 
N Norris 
G Loh 

Balance at 
Beginning 
of Year 

4,937,525 
4,346,875 
3,093,635 
17,800,000 

Options 
Exercised 

Options 
Expired 

Balance at 
End of Year 

Vested at 
30 June 2013 
Exercisable

– 
– 
– 
– 

(4,937,525) 
(4,346,875) 
(3,093,635) 
(17,800,000) 

– 
– 
– 
– 

–
–
–
–

c)  Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel

Director 

P Thompson 
C Switzer 
N Norris 
G Loh 

Balance at 
Beginning 
of Year 

Granted 
as 
Remuneration 

Issued on 
Exercise 
of Options 

Net 
Change 
Other 

9,562,582 
6,393,750 
9,250,000 
11,067,131 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

300,000 
300,000 
300,000 
1,565,000 

Balance at 
End of Year

9,862,582
6,693,750
9,550,000
12,632,131

d)  Other Transactions and Balances with Key Management Personnel
During the financial year the Company acquired the 70% interest in the Bungalien phosphate rights that it didn’t 
own from Swift Venture Corporation, a Company associated with one of the directors of the Company, Mr Sunny 
Loh. Subsequent to shareholder approval at the Company’s annual general meeting, the Company issued, on 
20 December 2012, 10 million shares to Swift Venture Corporation (and its nominees) as consideration for the 
acquisition.

Other than the above, there are no transactions with Directors, or Director related entities or associates, other than 
those reported in the remuneration disclosures in the Remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report.

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  65

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

22. Related Party Transactions

Total amounts receivable and payable from entities in the wholly-owned 
group (see Note 20 for details of controlled entities) at balance date:

non-Current Receivables
Loans to controlled entities 

non-Current Payables
Loans from controlled entities 

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

11,203,294 

10,087,783

– 

(810,000)

23. Events Subsequent to Balance Date

Other than the following, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of 
this report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the Directors of the 
Company to affect substantially the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of 
the Group in subsequent financial years.

•	 On	22	July	2013	the	Company	obtained	shareholder	approval	to	proceed	with	the	issue	of	shares	for	the	

acquisition of the 40% interest in Angka Alamjaya Sdn Bhd (AASB) and to proceed with a Priority Entitlement 
Offer of options to holders of listed GBZOA options that expired on 30 June 2013;

•	 On	13	August	2013,	the	Company’s	Priority	Entitlement	Offer	closed	with	the	subsequent	issue	of	64,746,562	

listed options (GBZO) exercisable at 3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016. Entitlements under the offer 
were allotted on 19 August 2013 and the offer was finalised with the issue of the shortfall options on 27 August 
2013. Total proceeds of $323,733 were received from the issue of these options;

•	 On	22	August	2013	the	Company	completed	the	issue	of	50	million	listed	options	(GBZO)	exercisable	at	

3.5 cents each on or before 30 June 2016, pursuant to shareholder approval received on 22 July 2013 
and which were securities attaching to a share placement completed on 28 June 2013;

•	 On	30	August	2013	the	Company	issued	20	million	listed	options	(GBZO)	exercisable	at	3.5	cents	each	on	or	
before 30 June 2016, to Alvito Capital Holdings Inc for corporate advisory and promotional services provided 
to the Company;

•	 On	19	August	2013	the	Company	advised	that	it	had	completed	the	Acquisition	and	Joint	Venture	Agreement	
pursuant to which the Company would acquire a 40% interest in AASB, a Malaysian Company holding the 
mining concession for the Lubuk Mandi Gold Project, and enter into a joint venture with AASB to assess, and 
if positive, commence recommissioning of the Lubuk Mandi Gold Project.

On 30 August 2013 the Company completed the issue of 57,779,118 ordinary fully paid shares to nominees 
of AASB in respect of the acquisition; and

•	 On	2	September	2013	the	Company	appointed	Mr	Chiau	Woei	Lim,	Managing	Director	of	AASB,	to	the	Board	

as a Non-Executive Director of GBM Resources Limited.

24. Dividends

There are no dividends paid or payable during the year ended 30 June 2013 or the 30 June 2012 comparative year.

66  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25. Contingencies

i) Contingent liabilities
There were no material contingent liabilities not provided for in the financial statements of the Group as at 30 June 
2013 or 30 June 2012.

ii) Native Title and Aboriginal Heritage
Native title claims have been made with respect to areas which include tenements in which the Group has an 
interest. The Group is unable to determine the prospects for success or otherwise of the claims and, in any event, 
whether or not and to what extent the claims may significantly affect the Group or its projects. Agreement is being 
or has been reached with various native title claimants in relation to Aboriginal Heritage issues regarding certain 
areas in which the Group has an interest.

iii) Contingent assets
There were no material contingent assets as at 30 June 2013 or 30 June 2012.

26. Parent Entity Information

Financial position

Assets
    Current assets 
    Non-current assets 

Total Assets 

Liabilities
    Current liabilities 
    Non-current liabilities 

Total Liabilities 

nET ASSETS 

Equity
    Issued capital 
    Option reserve 
    Share based payments reserve 
    Accumulated losses 

TOTAL EQUITY 

Financial performance
    Loss for the year 
    Other comprehensive income 

Total comprehensive loss 

Contingent liabilities
For full details of contingent liabilities see Note 25.

Commitments
For full details of commitments see Note 17.

Consolidated

2013 
$ 

2012 
$

1,656,683 
14,228,668 

2,002,536
14,531,979

15,885,351 

16,534,515

(446,085) 
– 

(1,435,847)
(810,000)

(446,085) 

(2,245,847)

15,439,266 

14,288,668

21,118,244 
– 
– 
(5,678,978) 

18,228,936
698,146
920,638
(5,559,052)

15,439,266 

14,288,668

(1,726,492) 
– 

(1,196,811)
–

(1,726,492) 

(1,196,811)

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  67

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Declaration
For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

1. 

In the opinion of the Directors:

a) 

the accompanying financial statements and notes are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 
including:

i. 

giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2013 and of its 
performance for the year then ended; and

ii. 

complying with Accounting Standards and Corporations Regulations 2001.

b) 

c) 

there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as  and when 
they become due and payable.

the financial statements and notes are in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

2.  This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in 
accordance with Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2013.

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Peter Thompson 
Executive Chairman

Dated this 27th day of September 2013

68  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

 
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 

To the members of GBM Resources Limited 

Report on the Financial Report 

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  financial  report  of  GBM  Resources  Limited  (“the  company”),  which 
comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2013, the consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of 
cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other 
explanatory  information,  and  the  directors’  declaration  for  the  consolidated  entity.  The  consolidated  entity 
comprises  the  company  and  the  entities  it  controlled  at  the  year’s  end  or  from  time  to  time  during  the 
financial year. 

Directors’ responsibility for the financial report  

The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and 
fair  view  in  accordance  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards  and  the  Corporations  Act  2001  and  for  such 
internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that 
is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.  

In  Note  1(b),  the  directors  also  state,  in  accordance  with  Accounting  Standard  AASB  101:  Presentation  of 
Financial Statements, that the financial report complies with International Financial Reporting Standards. 

Auditor’s responsibility  

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit 
in  accordance  with  Australian  Auditing  Standards.  Those  standards  require  that  we  comply  with  relevant 
ethical  requirements  relating  to  audit  engagements  and  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable 
assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.  

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the 
financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the 
risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  financial  report,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  In  making  those  risk 
assessments,  the  auditor  considers  internal  control  relevant  to  the  company’s  preparation  and  fair 
presentation  of  the  financial  report  in  order  to  design  audit  procedures  that  are  appropriate  in  the 
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control. An 
audit  also  includes  evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies  used  and  the  reasonableness  of 
accounting  estimates  made  by  the  directors,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  presentation  of  the  financial 
report.  

Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or management. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our 
audit opinion.  

Independence 

In  conducting  our  audit,  we  have  complied  with  the  independence  requirements  of  the  Corporations  Act 
2001.  

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  69

51 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Auditor’s opinion  

In our opinion:  

(a)  the  financial  report  of  GBM  Resources  Limited  is  in  accordance  with  the  Corporations  Act  2001, 

including:  

(i)  giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2013 and 

of its performance for the year ended on that date; and  

(ii)  complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and  
(b)  the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in 

Note 1(b).  

Report on the Remuneration Report 

We have audited the remuneration report included in the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2013.  
The  directors  of  the  company  are  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  presentation  of  the  remuneration 
report  in  accordance  with  section  300A  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001.  Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an 
opinion  on  the  remuneration  report,  based  on  our  audit  conducted  in  accordance  with  Australian  Auditing 
Standards.  

Auditor’s opinion  

In our opinion the remuneration report of GBM Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2013 complies 
with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.  

HLB Mann Judd 
Chartered Accountants  

Perth, Western Australia
27 September 2013  

L Di Giallonardo 
Partner  

70  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

52 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASX Additional Information

Pursuant to the Listing Rules of the Australian Securities Exchange Limited, the shareholder information set out below 
was applicable as at 27 September 2013.

a. Distribution of Equity Securities

Range

1 – 1,000

1,001 – 5,000

5,001 – 10,000

10,001 – 100,000

100,001 and over

Listed Shares (GBZ)

Listed Options (GBZO)

Number 
of Holders

52

84

152

563

309

1,160

Securities 
Held

10,725

328,967

1,331,559

24,705,239

358,817,631

385,194,121

Number 
of Holders

Securities 
Held

1

3

3

22

81

110

800

10,500

23,750

920,090

133,791,422

134,746,562

There are 296 shareholders holding unmarketable parcels represented by 11,111 shares.

b. Substantial Shareholders
The Company has received no current notifications for inclusion on the Register of Substantial Shareholders 
(who hold 5% or more of the issued capital).

c. Twenty Largest Shareholders

Shareholder

UOB Kay Hian Pte Ltd 
Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd
Chew Leok Chuan
Sung Yoon Chon
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
Tan Thiam Chye
Lion Resources Development Pte Ltd
Superfine Nominees Pty Ltd
Swift Venture Holdings Corporation
Cheng Ee Huang
Constance Tan Chai Ai
Carpentaria Corporation Pty Ltd 
Neil Norris 
Australian Global Capital Pty Ltd
Bell Potter Nominees Ltd
De Gracie Nominees Pty Ltd 
Hong Wei Boon
Kevin James Hendry
Ivan Perry Wu
Fullerton Private Capital Pty Ltd

Shares 
Held

61,491,851
51,574,228
19,900,000
13,200,000
10,762,421
10,000,000
10,000,000
9,862,582
8,366,708
5,500,000
4,900,000
4,856,250
4,800,000
4,500,000
4,496,000
3,750,000
3,500,000
2,833,334
2,626,500
2,200,000

% of Issued 
Capital

15.96%
13.39%
5.17%
3.42%
2.79%
2.60%
2.60%
2.56%
2.17%
1.43%
1.27%
1.26%
1.25%
1.17%
1.17%
0.97%
0.91%
0.74%
0.68%
0.57%

239,119,874

62.08%

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  71

 
ASX Additional Information

d. Twenty Largest Option Holders

Optionholder

Alvito Capital Holdings Inc
Constance Tan Cai Ai
Chew Leok Chuan
Swift Venture Holdings Corporation
Bell Potter Nominees Limited
Sung Yoon Chon
Rosegate Investments Pty Ltd
ABN Amro Clearing Sydney Nominees Pty Ltd
Au Sai Chuen
Sin Yew Seng (2004) Pte Ltd
John Saunders
Kevin Harvey & Ruth Linda Payne
Superfine Nominees Pty Ltd
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
KP Super Fund A/c
KP Family Fund A/c
Tan Hong Huat
De Gracie Nominees Pty Ltd
Shahrin Mohd Shahir
Shahrin Bin Mond Shahir

Options 
Held

24,350,000
22,400,000
10,000,000
8,900,000
6,702,188
5,725,000
5,142,500
3,199,300
2,600,000
2,500,000
2,460,709
2,316,250
1,718,750
1,552,500
1,491,500
1,422,500
1,400,000
1,296,818
1,250,000
1,250,000

% of Issued 
Options

18.07%
16.62%
7.42%
6.61%
4.97%
4.25%
3.82%
2.37%
1.93%
1.86%
1.83%
1.72%
1.28%
1.15%
1.11%
1.06%
1.04%
0.96%
0.93%
0.93%

107,678,015

79.91%

e. Voting Rights
In accordance with the Company’s Constitution, voting rights in respect of ordinary shares are on a show of hands 
whereby each member present in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll, each share will have 
one vote.

f. Restricted Securities
There are no restricted securities.

72  GBM Resources Annual Report 2013

Corporate Directory

Directors
Peter Thompson 
Managing Director/ 
Executive Chairman

Cameron Switzer 
Non-Executive Director

Guan Huat Loh 
Non-Executive Director

Chiau Woei Lim 
Non-Executive Director

Neil Norris 
Executive Director/ 
Exploration Director

Company Secretary
Kevin Hart

Registered Office
Suite 8, 7 The Esplanade
Mt Pleasant  WA  6153
AUSTRALIA
Telephone:  +61 8 9316 9100
Facsimile:  +61 8 9315 5475

Principal Place of Business
Suite 8, 7 The Esplanade
Mt Pleasant  WA  6153
AUSTRALIA
Telephone:  +61 8 9316 9100
Facsimile:  +61 8 9315 5475

Website and email address
Website:  www.gbmr.com.au
Email: 

admin@gbmr.com.au

Exploration Office
10 Parker Street
PO Box 658
Castlemaine  VIC  3450
AUSTRALIA
Telephone:  +61 3 5470 5033

Auditors
HLB Mann Judd
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street
Perth  WA  6000
AUSTRALIA

Share Registry
Advanced Share Registry Services
150 Stirling Highway
Nedlands  WA  6009
AUSTRALIA
Telephone:  +61 8 9389 8033
Facsimile:  +61 8 9389 7871

Securities Exchange Listing
GBM Resources Limited  
– shares & options are  
listed on the Australian 
Securities Exchange 
(ASX Code: GBZ, GBZO)

Solicitors
Steinepreis Paganin
Lawyers and Consultants
Level 4, Next Building
16 Milligan Street
Perth  WA  6000
AUSTRALIA

Wallbrook Investor Relation 
Suite 8, 11 Collin Grove Street
West Perth  WA  6005
Karen Oswald Account Director
Mobile: 

0423 602 353

GBM Resources Annual Report 2013  73

 
Suite 8, 7 The Esplanade, Mt Pleasant WA 6153  Australia
Telephone: +61 8 9316 9100 • Facsimile: +61 8 9315 5475
Website: www.gbmr.com.au • Email: admin@gbmr.com.au