Quarterlytics / Energy / Oil & Gas Exploration & Production / GeoPark Limited

GeoPark Limited

gprk · NYSE Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker gprk
Exchange NYSE
Sector Energy
Industry Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Employees 476
← All annual reports
FY2023 Annual Report · GeoPark Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ANNUAL REPORT 2023

3
2
0
2

T
R
O
P
E
R

L
A
U
N
N
A

k
r
a
P
o
e
G

EXPLORER

OPERATOR

CONSOLIDATOR

 
 
 
Table of ContentsUNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549FORM 20-F(Mark One)☐           REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934OR☒           ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023OR☐           TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934For the transition period from ______________________ to ___________________________OR☐           SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of event requiring this shell company reportCommission file number: 001-36298GEOPARK LIMITED(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)Bermuda(Jurisdiction of incorporation)Calle 94 N° 11-30, 8o floorBogotá, Colombia(Address of principal executive offices)Mónica Jiménez GonzálezChief Strategy, Sustainability and Legal OfficerGeoPark LimitedCalle 94 N° 11-30, 8o floorBogotá, ColombiaPhone: +57 1 743 2337(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)Copies to:Maurice Blanco, Esq.Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP450 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212 ) 450 4000Fax: (212) 701 5800Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of each classTrading SymbolsName of each exchange on which registeredCommon shares, par value US$0.001per shareGPRKNew York Stock ExchangeSecurities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:NoneTable of Contents

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital stock or common stock as of the close of
business covered by the annual report.

Common shares: 55,327,520

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

  Yes  ☐      No ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

  Yes ☐      No ☒  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

  Yes ☒      No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files).

  Yes ☒      No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an
emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “emerging growth company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer  ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

Non-accelerated filer  ☐

Accelerated filer  ☒

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark
if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.              ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.
7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-
based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to
§240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:

US GAAP  ☐

International Financial Reporting Standards
as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board  ☒

Other  ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to follow.

☐  Item 17   ☐  Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).

  Yes ☐      No ☒ 

Table of Contents

GEOPARK LIMITED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Glossary of oil and natural gas terms
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

A. Directors and senior management
B. Advisers
C. Auditors

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

A. Offer statistics
B. Method and expected timetable

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. Reserved
B. Capitalization and indebtedness
C. Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds
D. Risk factors

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and development of the company
B. Business Overview
C. Organizational structure
D. Property, plant and equipment

ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A. Operating results
B. Liquidity and capital resources
C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.
D. Trend information
E. Critical accounting policies and estimates

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. Directors and executive officers
B. Compensation
C. Board practices
D. Employees
E. Share ownership
F. Disclosure of a registrant´s action to recover erroneously awarded compensation

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. Major shareholders
B. Related party transactions
C.

Interests of Experts and Counsel
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. Consolidated statements and other financial information
B. Significant changes

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. Offering and listing details
B. Plan of distribution
C. Markets
D. Selling shareholders
E. Dilution

i

Page

iii 
vii
x
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
34
34
37
88
88
88
88
88
101
105
105
105
108
108
112
116
118
119
119
120
120
120
121
121
121
122
122
122
122
122
122
122

 
Table of Contents

F. Expenses of the issue

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. Share capital
B. Memorandum of association and bye-laws

Enforcement of Judgments
C. Material contracts
D. Exchange controls
E. Taxation
F. Dividends and paying agents
G. Statement by experts
H. Documents on display
I. Subsidiary information

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

A. Debt securities
B. Warrants and rights
C. Other securities
D. American Depositary Shares

PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

A. Defaults
B. Arrears and delinquencies

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

ITEM 16. RESERVED
ITEM 16A. Audit committee financial expert
ITEM 16B. Code of Conduct
ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the listing standards for audit committees
ITEM 16E. Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.
ITEM 16F. Change in registrant’s certifying accountant
ITEM 16G. Corporate governance
ITEM 16H. Mine safety disclosure
ITEM 16I. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
ITEM 16J. Insider trading policies
ITEM 16K. Cybersecurity
PART III
ITEM 17. Financial statements
ITEM 18. Financial statements
ITEM 19. Exhibits
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

ii

122
122
122
122
130
131
131
131
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
136
136
136
136
136
136

136
136
136
136
138
138
138
138
138
138
139
139
140
141
142
142
142
142
144
144
144
144
F-1

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS TERMS

The terms defined in this section are used throughout this annual report:

“appraisal well” means a well drilled to further confirm and evaluate the presence of hydrocarbons in a reservoir that has been
discovered.

“API” means the American Petroleum Institute’s inverted scale for denoting the “light” or “heaviness” of crude oils and other
liquid hydrocarbons.

“bbl”  means  one  stock  tank  barrel,  of  42  U.S.  gallons  liquid  volume,  used  herein  in  reference  to  crude  oil,  condensate  or
natural gas liquids.

“bcf” means one billion cubic feet of natural gas.

“bcm” means billion cubic meters.

“boe” means barrels of oil equivalent, with 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil.

“boepd” means barrels of oil equivalent per day.

“bopd” means barrels of oil per day.

“British thermal unit” or “btu” means the heat required to raise the temperature of a one-pound mass of water from 58.5 to
59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.

“basin” means a large natural depression on the earth’s surface in which sediments generally brought by water accumulate.

“completion”  means  the  process  of  treating  a  drilled  well  followed  by  the  installation  of  permanent  equipment  for  the
production of natural gas or oil, or in the case of a dry hole, the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.

“developed  acreage”  means  the  number  of  acres  that  are  allocated  or  assignable  to  productive  wells  or  wells  capable  of
production.

“developed  reserves”  are  expected  quantities  to  be  recovered  from  existing  wells  and  facilities.  Reserves  are  considered
developed only after the necessary equipment has been installed or when the costs to do so are relatively minor compared to
the  cost  of  a  well.  Where  required  facilities  become  unavailable,  it  may  be  necessary  to  reclassify  developed  reserves  as
undeveloped.

“development  well”  means  a  well  drilled  within  the  proved  area  of  an  oil  or  gas  reservoir  to  the  depth  of  a  stratigraphic
horizon known to be productive.

“dry hole” means a well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the
sale of such production exceed production expenses and taxes.

“E&P contract” means exploration and production contract.

“economic  interest”  means  an  indirect  participation  interest  in  the  net  revenues  from  a  given  block  based  on  bilateral
agreements with the concessionaires.

“CEOP”  (Contrato  Especial  de  Operación)  means  a  special  operating  contract  the  Chilean  signs  with  a  company  or  a
consortium of companies for the exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbon wells.

iii

Table of Contents

“economically  producible”  means  a  resource  that  generates  revenue  that  exceeds,  or  is  reasonably  expected  to  exceed,  the
costs of the operation.

“exploratory well” means a well drilled to find and produce oil or gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir in a field
previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir, or to extend a known reservoir. Generally, an exploratory
well is any well that is not a development well, a service well, or a stratigraphic test well as those items are defined below.

“field” means an area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to the same individual
geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more reservoirs in a field that are separated
vertically by intervening impervious strata, or laterally by local geologic barriers, or by both. Reservoirs that are associated by
being in overlapping or adjacent fields may be treated as a single or common operational field. The geological terms structural
feature  and  stratigraphic  condition  are  intended  to  identify  localized  geological  features  as  opposed  to  the  broader  terms  of
basins, trends, provinces, plays, areas-of-interest, etc.

“formation” means a layer of rock which has distinct characteristics that differ from nearby rock.

“mbbl” means one thousand barrels of crude oil, condensate, or natural gas liquids.

“mboe” means one thousand barrels of oil equivalent.

“mcf” means one thousand cubic feet of natural gas.

“Measurements” include:

● “m” or “meter” means one meter, which equals approximately 3.28084 feet;

● “km” means one kilometer, which equals approximately 0.621371 miles;

● “sq. km” means one square kilometer, which equals approximately 247.1 acres;

● “bbl”  “bo,”  or  “barrel  of  oil”  means  one  stock  tank  barrel,  which  is  equivalent  to  approximately  0.15898  cubic

meters;

● “boe” means one barrel of oil equivalent, which equals approximately 160.2167 cubic meters, determined using the

ratio of 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil;

● “cf” means one cubic foot;

● “m,” when used before bbl, boe or cf, means one thousand bbl, boe or cf, respectively;

● “mm,” when used before bbl, boe or cf, means one million bbl, boe or cf, respectively;

● “b,” when used before bbl, boe or cf, means one billion bbl, boe or cf, respectively; and

● “pd” means per day.

“metric ton” or “MT” means one thousand kilograms. Assuming standard quality oil, one metric ton equals 7.9 bbl.

“mmbbl” means one million barrels of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.

“mmboe” means one million barrels of oil equivalent.

iv

Table of Contents

“mmbtu” means one million British thermal units.

“productive  well”  means  a  well  that  is  found  to  be  capable  of  producing  hydrocarbons  in  sufficient  quantities  such  that
proceeds from the sale of the production exceed production expenses and taxes.

“prospect” means a potential trap which may contain hydrocarbons and is supported by the necessary amount and quality of
geologic  and  geophysical  data  to  indicate  a  probability  of  oil  and/or  natural  gas  accumulation  ready  to  be  drilled. The  five
required elements (generation, migration, reservoir, seal and trap) must be present for a prospect to work and if any of them
fail neither oil nor natural gas will be present, at least not in commercial volumes.

“proved  developed  reserves”  means  those  proved  reserves  that  can  be  expected  to  be  recovered  through  existing  wells  and
facilities and by existing operating methods.

“proved  reserves”  means  estimated  quantities  of  crude  oil,  natural  gas,  and  natural  gas  liquids  which  geological  and
engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be economically recoverable in future years from known reservoirs
under existing economic and operating conditions, as well as additional reserves expected to be obtained through confirmed
improved recovery techniques, as defined in SEC Regulation S-X 4 10(a)(2).

“proved  undeveloped  reserves”  means  are  those  proved  reserves  that  are  expected  to  be  recovered  from  future  wells  and
facilities,  including  future  improved  recovery  projects  which  are  anticipated  with  a  high  degree  of  certainty  in  reservoirs
which have previously shown favorable response to improved recovery projects.

“reasonable certainty” means a high degree of confidence.

“recompletion” means the process of re-entering an existing wellbore that is either producing or not producing and completing
new reservoirs in an attempt to establish or increase existing production.

“reserves”  means  estimated  remaining  quantities  of  oil  and  gas  and  related  substances  anticipated  to  be  economically
producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist,
or  there  must  be  a  reasonable  expectation  that  there  will  exist,  a  revenue  interest  in  the  production,  installed  means  of
delivering oil, gas, or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

“reservoir” means a porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil and/or
gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is individual and separate from other reservoirs.

“royalty” means a fractional undivided interest in the production of oil and natural gas wells or the proceeds therefrom, to be
received free and clear of all costs of development, operations or maintenance.

“service  well”  means  a  well  drilled  or  completed  for  the  purpose  of  supporting  production  in  an  existing  field.  Specific
purposes of service wells include gas injection, water injection, steam injection, air injection, saltwater disposal, water supply
for injection, observation, or injection for in-situ combustion.

“shale” means a fine-grained sedimentary rock formed by consolidation of clay- and silt-sized particles into thin, relatively
impermeable layers. Shale can include relatively large amounts of organic material compared with other rock types and thus
has the potential to become rich hydrocarbon source rock. Its fine grain size and lack of permeability can allow shale to form a
good cap rock for hydrocarbon traps.

“spacing” means the distance between wells producing from the same reservoir. Spacing is often expressed in terms of acres
(e.g., 40-acre spacing, and is often established by regulatory agencies).

“stratigraphic test well” means a drilling effort, geologically directed, to obtain information pertaining to a specific geologic
condition.  Such  wells  customarily  are  drilled  without  the  intention  of  being  completed  for  hydrocarbon  production.  This
classification also includes tests identified as core tests and all types of expendable holes related to

v

Table of Contents

hydrocarbon  exploration.  Stratigraphic  test  wells  are  classified  as  (i)  exploratory-type,  if  not  drilled  in  a  proved  area,  or
(ii) development-type, if drilled in a proved area.

“undeveloped reserves” are quantities expected to be recovered through future investments: (1) from new wells on undrilled
acreage in known accumulation, (2) from deepening existing wells to a different (but known) reservoir, (3) from infill wells
that will increase recovery, or (4) where a relatively large expenditure (e.g., when compared to the cost of drilling a new well)
is  required  to  (a)  recomplete  an  existing  well  or  (b)  install  production  or  transportation  facilities  for  primary  or  improved
recovery projects.

“unit”  means  the  joining  of  all  or  substantially  all  interests  in  a  reservoir  or  field,  rather  than  a  single  tract,  to  provide  for
development and operation without regard to separate property interests. Also, the area covered by a unitization agreement.

“wellbore” means the hole drilled by the bit that is equipped for oil or gas production on a completed well. Also called well or
borehole.

“working interest” means the right granted to the lessee of a property to explore for and to produce and own oil, gas, or other
minerals.  The  working  interest  owners  bear  the  exploration,  development,  and  operating  costs  on  either  a  cash,  penalty,  or
carried basis.

“workover” means operations in a producing well to restore or increase production.

vi

Table of Contents

Certain definitions

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references in this annual report to:

● “GeoPark Limited,” “GeoPark,” “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and words of a similar effect, are to GeoPark

Limited, an exempted company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, together with its consolidated subsidiaries;

● “Amerisur” are to Amerisur Resources Limited and its subsidiaries;

● “GeoPark Brazil” are to GeoPark Brasil Exploração e Produção de Petróleo e Gás Ltda.;

● “YPF” are to YPF S.A.;

● “ONGC” are to ONGC Videsh Limited, international petroleum company of India;

● “Petroamazonas” are to Petroamazonas Ecuador S.A.;

● “Petroecuador” are to Empresa Pública de hidrocarburos del Ecuador;

● “MSCI” are to Morgan Stanley Capital International;

● “Notes due 2024” are to our 2017 issuance of US$425.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% senior notes

due 2024;

● “Notes due 2027” are to our 2020 issuance of US$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.50% senior notes

due 2027;

● “US$” and “U.S. dollar” are to the official currency of the United States of America;

● “Ch$” and “Chilean pesos” are to the official currency of Chile;

● “AR$” and “Argentine pesos” are to the official currency of Argentina;

● “real,” “reais” and “R$” are to the official currency of Brazil;

● “ANP” are to the Brazilian National Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency (Agência Nacional do Petróleo,

Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis);

● “ANH” are to the Colombian National Hydrocarbons Agency (Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos);

● “ENAP” are to the Chilean National Petroleum Company (Empresa Nacional de Petróleo);

● “RODA” are to the Oil Pipeline Network of the Amazonian District (Red de Oleoductos del Distrito Amazónico);

● “SOTE” are to the Ecuadorian Oil Pipeline System (Sistema de Oleoducto Transecuatoriano);

● “IOGP” are to the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers;

vii

Table of Contents

● “IPIECA” are to the International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association;

● “IADC” are to the International Association of Drilling Contractors;

● “ARPEL” are to the Regional Association of Oil and Gas Companies, a non-profit association gathering oil, gas and

biofuels sector companies and institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean;

● “UTA” are to Unidad Tributaria Anual;

● “economic interest” are to an indirect participation interest in the net revenues from a given block based on bilateral

agreements with the concessionaires;

● “ESG” are to Environmental, Social and Governance; and

● “IFC” are to International Finance Corporation.

Financial statements

Our  historical  financial  data  presented  does  not  include  any  results  or  other  financial  information  of  any  acquisitions,

prior to their incorporation into our financial statements.

Our consolidated financial statements

This annual report includes our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and for each

of the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 (hereinafter “Consolidated Financial Statements”).

Our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  are  presented  in  US$  and  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  International

Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

Our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  have  been  audited  by  Ernst  &  Young
Audit S.A.S. (member of Ernst & Young Global Limited), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their
reports included elsewhere in this annual report.

Our fiscal year ends December 31. References in this annual report to a fiscal year, such as “fiscal year 2023,” relate to

our fiscal year ended on December 31 of that calendar year.

Non IFRS financial measures

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-IFRS financial measure that is used by management and external users of our
financial  statements,  such  as  industry  analysts,  investors,  lenders  and  rating  agencies,  to  assess  the  performance  of  our
Company and the operating segments.

We  define Adjusted  EBITDA  as  profit  (loss)  for  the  period  (determined  as  if  IFRS  16  Leases  has  not  been  adopted),
before net finance cost, income tax, depreciation, amortization, certain non-cash items such as impairments and write-offs of
unsuccessful exploration efforts, accrual of share-based payment, unrealized result on commodity risk management contracts,
geological  and  geophysical  expenses  allocated  to  capitalized  projects,  and  other  non-recurring  events. Adjusted  EBITDA  is
not a measure of profit or cash flows as determined by IFRS.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful because it allows us to more effectively evaluate our operating performance and
compare the results of our operations from period to period without regard to our financing methods or capital structure. We
exclude the items listed above from profit (loss) for the period in arriving at Adjusted EBITDA because

viii

Table of Contents

these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and
book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, profit (loss) for the period or cash flows from operating activities as
determined in accordance with IFRS or as an indicator of our operating performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from
Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a
company’s  cost  of  capital  and  tax  structure  and  significant  and/or  recurring  write-offs,  as  well  as  the  historic  costs  of
depreciable assets, or unrealized results in commodity risk management contracts, none of which are components of Adjusted
EBITDA.  Our  computation  of  Adjusted  EBITDA  may  not  be  comparable  to  other  similarly  titled  measures  of  other
companies.

For  a  reconciliation  of  Adjusted  EBITDA  to  the  IFRS  financial  measure  of  profit  for  the  year,  see  Note  6  to  our

Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the years ended 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Oil and gas reserves and production information

DeGolyer and MacNaughton 2023 Year-end Reserves Report

The information included elsewhere in this annual report regarding estimated quantities of proved reserves in Colombia,
Ecuador, Brazil and Chile is derived from estimates of the proved reserves as of December 31, 2023. The reserves estimates
described herein are derived from the DeGolyer and MacNaughton Reserves Report (“D&M Reserves Report”), which was
prepared  for  us  by  the  independent  reserves  engineering  team  of  DeGolyer  and  MacNaughton  Corp.  and  is  included  as  an
exhibit to this annual report. The D&M Reserves Report presents oil and gas reserves estimates located in various blocks in
the  Llanos  and  Putumayo  Basins  in  Colombia,  the  Perico  Block  in  the  Oriente  Basin  in  Ecuador,  the  BCAM-40  (Manati)
Block in the Camamu-Almada Basin in Brazil and the Fell Block in the Magallanes Basin in Chile.

Market share and other information

Market data, other statistical information, information regarding recent developments in the countries in which we operate
and  certain  industry  forecast  data  used  in  this  annual  report  were  obtained  from  internal  reports  and  studies,  where
appropriate,  as  well  as  estimates,  market  research,  publicly  available  information  and  industry  publications.  Industry
publications generally state that the information they include has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that
the  accuracy  and  completeness  of  such  information  is  not  guaranteed.  Similarly,  internal  reports  and  studies,  estimates  and
market research, which we believe to be reliable and accurately extracted by us for use in this annual report, have not been
independently verified. However, we believe such data is accurate and agree that we are responsible for the accurate extraction
of such information from such sources and its correct reproduction in this annual report.

In addition, we have provided definitions for certain industry terms used in this annual report in the “Glossary of oil and

natural gas terms”.

Rounding

We  have  made  rounding  adjustments  to  some  of  the  figures  included  elsewhere  in  this  annual  report.  Accordingly,

numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them.

ix

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This  annual  report  contains  statements  that  constitute  forward-looking  statements.  Many  of  the  forward-looking
statements  contained  in  this  annual  report  can  be  identified  by  the  use  of  forward-looking  words  such  as  “anticipate,”
“believe,” “could,” “expect,” “should,” “plan,” “intend,” “will,” “estimate” and “potential,” among others.

Forward-looking  statements  appear  in  a  number  of  places  in  this  annual  report  and  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,
statements  regarding  our  intent,  belief  or  current  expectations.  Forward-looking  statements  are  based  on  our  management’s
beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Such statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due
to various factors, including, but not limited to, those identified under the section “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk factors”
in this annual report. These risks and uncertainties include factors relating to:

● the volatility of oil and natural gas prices;

● operating risks, including equipment failures and the amounts and timing of revenues and expenses;

● termination of, or intervention in, concessions, rights or authorizations granted by the Colombian, Ecuadorian, and

Brazilian governments to us;

● uncertainties inherent in making estimates of our oil and natural gas data;

● environmental constraints on operations and environmental liabilities arising out of past or present operations;

● discovery and development of oil and natural gas reserves;

● climate change related risks;

● project delays or cancellations;

● financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;

● political, legal, regulatory, governmental, administrative and economic conditions and developments in the countries

in which we operate;

● social and political unrest in many countries in which we operate;

● fluctuations in inflation and exchange rates in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil and in other countries in which we may

operate in the future;

● availability and cost of drilling rigs, production equipment, supplies, personnel and oil field services;

● contract counterparty risk;

● projected and targeted capital expenditures and other cost commitments and revenues;

● pandemics, or the future outbreak of any highly infectious or contagious disease, including the COVID-19 pandemic;

● weather and other natural phenomena;

● armed conflicts, including the current armed conflicts in Ukraine and Israel;

x

Table of Contents

● the impact of recent and future regulatory proceedings and changes, changes in environmental, health and safety and
other laws and regulations to which our company or operations are subject, as well as changes in the application of
existing laws and regulations;

● current and future litigation;

● our ability to successfully identify, integrate and complete pending or future acquisitions and dispositions;

● our ability to retain key members of our senior management and key technical employees;

● competition from other similar oil and natural gas companies;

● market or business conditions and fluctuations in global and local demand for energy;

● the  direct  or  indirect  impact  on  our  business  resulting  from  terrorist  incidents  or  responses  to  such  incidents,

including the effect on the availability of and premiums on insurance;

● the adverse effect which a substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas price may have on our business;

● material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting;

● the difficulty in integrating significant acquisitions or unexpected contingencies or changes in reserves estimates we

discover following the completion of such acquisitions; and

● other factors discussed under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk factors” in this annual report.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update
them in light of new information or future developments or to release publicly any revisions to these statements in order to
reflect later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

xi

Table of Contents

ITEM 1.  IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

A.    Directors and senior management

PART I

Not applicable.

B.    Advisers

Not applicable.

C.    Auditors

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

A.    Offer statistics

Not applicable.

B.    Method and expected timetable

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.  KEY INFORMATION

A.    Reserved

B.    Capitalization and indebtedness

Not applicable.

C.    Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds

Not applicable.

D.    Risk factors

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if any of the risks
described below occur. As a result, the market price of our common shares could decline, and you could lose all or part of
your  investment.  This  annual  report  also  contains  forward-looking  statements  that  involve  risks  and  uncertainties.  See
“Forward-Looking  Statements.”  The  risks  below  are  not  the  only  ones  facing  our  Company. Additional  risks  not  currently
known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect us. The following risk factors have been grouped
as follows:

a) Risks relating to our business;

b) Risks relating to the countries in which we operate; and

c) Risks relating to our common shares.

1

Table of Contents

Summary of Key Risks

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, discussed in more detail below. These risks include, among

others, the following key risks:

● A substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices may materially adversely affect our business, financial

condition, or results of operations.

● Low oil prices may impact our operations and corporate strategy.

● Unless we replace our oil and natural gas reserves, our reserves and production will decline over time. Our business
is dependent on our continued successful identification of productive fields and prospects and the identified locations
in which we drill in the future may not yield oil or natural gas in commercial quantities.

● We derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales to a few key customers.

● Our results of operations could be materially adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

● There are inherent risks and uncertainties relating to the exploration and production of oil and natural gas.

● Our  identified  potential  drilling  location  inventories  are  scheduled  over  many  years,  making  them  susceptible  to

uncertainties that could materially alter the occurrence or timing of their drilling.

● Our business requires significant capital investment and maintenance expenses, which we may be unable to finance

on satisfactory terms or at all.

● Oil and gas operations contain a high degree of risk, and we may not be fully insured against all risks we face in our

business.

● The development schedule of oil and natural gas projects is subject to cost overruns and delays.

● Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense, which makes it difficult for us to attract capital, acquire

properties and prospects, market oil and natural gas and secure trained personnel.

● Our estimated oil and gas reserves are based on assumptions that may prove inaccurate.

● Our  inability  to  access  needed  equipment  and  infrastructure  in  a  timely  manner  may  hinder  our  access  to  oil  and

natural gas markets and generate significant incremental costs or delays in our oil and natural gas production.

● We may suffer delays or incremental costs due to difficulties in negotiations with landowners and local communities,

including indigenous communities, where our reserves are located.

● Under the terms of some of our various E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements,
we  are  obligated  to  drill  wells,  declare  any  discoveries,  and  file  periodic  reports  to  retain  our  rights  and  establish
development areas. Failure to meet these obligations may result in the loss of our interests in the undeveloped parts
of our blocks or concession areas.

● Our  contracts  in  obtaining  rights  to  explore  and  develop  oil  and  natural  gas  reserves  are  subject  to  contractual
expiration  dates  and  operating  conditions,  and  our  E&P  contracts,  production  sharing  agreements  and  concession
agreements are subject to early termination in certain circumstances.

● We are not, and may not be in the future, the sole owner or operator of all our licensed areas and do not, and may not
in the future, hold all the working interests in some of our licensed areas. Therefore, we may not be able to control
the timing of exploration or development efforts, associated costs, or the rate of production of any non-operated and,
to an extent, any non-wholly owned, assets.

2

Table of Contents

● Acquisitions  that  we  have  completed,  and  any  future  acquisitions,  strategic  investments,  partnerships,  or  alliances
could be difficult to integrate and/or identify, could divert the attention of key management personnel, disrupt our
business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our financial results, including impairment of goodwill and
other intangible assets.

● The  present  value  of  future  net  revenues  from  our  proved  reserves  will  not  necessarily  be  the  same  as  the  current

market value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves.

● The  development  of  our  proved  undeveloped  reserves  may  take  longer  and  may  require  higher  levels  of  capital
expenditures  than  we  currently  anticipate.  Therefore,  our  proved  undeveloped  reserves  ultimately  may  not  be
developed or produced.

● We  are  exposed  to  the  credit  risks  of  our  customers  and  any  material  nonpayment  or  nonperformance  by  our  key

customers could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

● Our  operations  are  subject  to  operating  hazards,  including  extreme  weather  events,  which  could  expose  us  to

potentially significant losses.

● We are highly dependent on certain members of our management and technical team, including our geologists and

geophysicists, and on our ability to hire and retain new qualified personnel.

● We and our operations are subject to numerous environmental, social, health and safety laws, regulations and rulings,

which may result in material liabilities and costs.

● Changing investor sentiment towards fossil fuels may affect our operations, impact the price of our common shares

and limit our access to financing and insurance.

● Legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing and other drilling activities for unconventional
oil  and  gas  resources  could  increase  the  future  costs  of  doing  business,  cause  delays  or  impede  our  plans,  and
materially adversely affect our operations.

● Our indebtedness and other commercial obligations could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to raise
additional  capital  and  prevent  us  from  fulfilling  our  obligations  under  our  existing  agreements  and  borrowing  of
additional funds.

● Our business could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity threats and related disruptions.

● The  COVID-19  pandemic  adversely  impacted  our  business,  financial  condition,  and  results  of  our  operations,  the
global economy, and the demand for and prices of oil and natural gas. The uncertainty of the impact an endemic or
pandemic  disease  may  have  makes  it  impossible  for  us  to  identify  all  potential  risks  related  to  the  pandemic  or
estimate the ultimate adverse impact that the pandemic may have on our business.

● We operate in an industry with climate related risks.

● We operate in areas of significant biodiversity value.

● We operate in areas that have historical and current ties to indigenous peoples.

● Exploration blocks in the Putumayo area carry significant costs related to biodiversity management and reputational

risk due to overlapping claims of rightful ownership.

● We have identified a material weakness in our internal control related to ineffective information technology general

controls which could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

● Our  operations  may  be  adversely  affected  by  political  and  economic  circumstances  in  the  countries  in  which  we

operate and in which we may operate in the future.

3

Table of Contents

● We depend on maintaining good relations with the respective host governments and national oil companies in each of

our countries of operation.

● Oil and natural gas companies in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil operate and have a working and/or economic interest

over, yet do not own any of the oil and natural gas reserves in such countries.

● Oil and gas operators are subject to extensive regulation in the countries in which we operate.

● Colombia has experienced and continues to experience internal security issues that have had or could have a negative

effect on the Colombian economy.

● Our operations are subject to security and human rights risks.

● We  expect  that  a  limited  number  of  financial  institutions  in  the  countries  in  which  we  operate,  as  well  as  some

institutions located in the United States, will hold all or most of our cash.

● An active, liquid, and orderly trading market for our common shares may not develop and the price of our stock may

be volatile, which could limit your ability to sell our common shares.

● Any decision to pay dividends in the future, and the amount of any distributions, is at the discretion of our board of
directors, and will depend on many factors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements,
prospects and other factors.

● We are a holding company and our only material assets are our equity interests in our operating subsidiaries and our
other investments; as a result, our principal source of revenue and cash flow is distributions from our subsidiaries;
our subsidiaries may be limited by law and by contract in making distributions to us.

● Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales may occur,

could cause the market price of our common shares to decline.

● Provisions of the Notes due 2027 could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party.

● Certain shareholders have substantial influence over us and could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key

transactions, including a change of control.

● Shareholder  activism  could  cause  us  to  incur  significant  expenses,  hinder  execution  of  our  business  strategy  and

impact our stock price.

● As  a  foreign  private  issuer,  we  are  subject  to  different  U.S.  securities  laws  and  NYSE  governance  standards  than
domestic U.S. issuers. This may afford less protection to holders of our common shares, and you may not receive
corporate and company information and disclosure that you are accustomed to receiving or in a manner in which you
are accustomed to receiving it.

● There are regulatory limitations on the ownership and transfer of our common shares which could result in the delay

or denial of any transfers you might seek to make.

● We are a Bermuda company, and it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments against us or against our directors

and executive officers.

● The  transfer  of  our  common  shares  may  be  subject  to  capital  gains  taxes  pursuant  to  indirect  transfer  rules  in

Colombia.

● Legislation enacted in Bermuda as to Economic Substance may affect our operations.

4

Table of Contents

Risks relating to our business

A  substantial  or  extended  decline  in  oil  and  natural  gas  prices  may  materially  adversely  affect  our  business,  financial
condition, or results of operations.

The prices that we receive for our oil and natural gas production heavily influence our revenues, profitability, access to
capital  and  growth  rate.  Historically,  the  markets  for  oil  and  natural  gas  have  been  volatile  and  will  likely  continue  to  be
volatile in the future. International oil and natural gas prices have fluctuated widely in recent years and may continue to do so
in the future.

The prices that we will receive for our production and the levels of our production depend on numerous factors beyond

our control. These factors include, but are not limited, to the following:

● global economic conditions;

● changes in global supply and demand for oil and natural gas;

● the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and other armed conflicts;

● the actions of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”);

● political and economic conditions, including embargoes, in oil-producing countries or affecting other countries;

● the level of oil- and natural gas-producing activities, particularly in the Middle East, Africa, Russia, South America

and the United States;

● the level of global oil and natural gas exploration and production activity;

● the level of global oil and natural gas inventories;

● availability of markets for natural gas;

● weather conditions and other natural disasters;

● technological advances affecting energy production or consumption;

● domestic  and  foreign  governmental  laws  and  regulations,  including  environmental,  health  and  safety  laws  and

regulations;

● proximity and capacity of oil and natural gas pipelines and other transportation facilities;

● the price and availability of competitors’ supplies of oil and natural gas in captive market areas;

● quality discounts for oil production based, among other things, on API, sulphur and mercury content;

● taxes and royalties under relevant laws and the terms of our contracts;

● our ability to enter into oil and natural gas sales contracts at fixed prices;

● the price and availability of alternative fuels, and possible regulations establishing costs for carbon emissions along

the value chain; and

5

Table of Contents

● future changes to our hedging policies.

These factors and the volatility of the energy markets make it extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price
movements. For example, during the last four years, Brent spot prices ranged from a low of US$19.3 per barrel to a high of
US$128.0 per barrel. Furthermore, oil and natural gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate in direct relationship to each other.

After the oil crisis that resulted from the pandemic in 2020, the crude oil market normalized during early 2021 and shifted
into an undersupply condition towards the end of that year. This condition was mainly driven by continued demand recovery
while supply grew at a slower pace. OPEC and non-OPEC producers (sometimes referred to as OPEC+) paced output increase
and capital discipline elsewhere, especially within the US Shale producers, were the key factors for moderate supply growth.
In  addition,  natural  gas  prices  spiked  significantly  during  the  last  quarter  of  2021,  especially  in  Europe,  pushing  oil  prices
higher as well. These factors brought Brent prices up to US$78 per barrel at the end of 2021.

The  armed  conflict  between  Russia  and  Ukraine  during  2022,  and  the  imposition  of  comprehensive  sanctions  against
Russia (including in relation to the Russian energy sector), as well as the announcement of prohibitions on Russian oil and gas
imports  by  certain  members  of  the  European  Union,  the  United  Kingdom,  the  United  States,  and  other  countries,  led  to
volatility in the price of global oil and gas. For example, Brent spot price rose to a maximum of US$128 per barrel in March
2022.

By the second half of 2022, sharply rising inflation led central banks to shift to a more restrictive policy stance, which
historically  is  indicative  of  a  potential  economic  recession. An  economic  recession  could  influence  crude  oil  demand  and,
therefore, lead to a drop in crude oil prices, which dropped to US$86 per barrel by the end of 2022, 30% lower from the levels
observed in June 2022.

The year 2023 and the beginning of 2024 can be described as a consolidation period after a highly volatile 2022, where
the  much-anticipated  Chinese  economic  recovery  did  not  meet  expectations,  while  the  resilience  of  the  U.S.  economy
positively surprised the macroeconomic environment. Despite the macro trend, countries like India and China took advantage
of lower oil prices and their access to discounted barrels from Russia and Iran, and drove the world’s oil demand to an all-
time-high of 103 million barrels a day, supporting Brent prices above $70/bbl. OPEC+ intervened the oil markets by cutting
supply, especially Saudi Arabia and Russia, who pledged a combined voluntary cut of 1.3 million barrels a day until year-end.
The group’s intervention resulted in the world’s oil inventories decreasing to a multi-year low and served as a catalyst for a
sustained rally that supported a rise in Brent prices to approximately $100/bbl. Oil markets have currently shifted their focus
to the evolution of the conflict between Israel and Hamas considering the potential impact on the crude oil supply from the
region if the conflict extends beyond the region’s borders.

For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  97%  of  our  revenues  were  derived  from  oil.  Because  we  expect  that  our

production mix will continue to be weighted towards oil, our financial results are more sensitive to movements in oil prices.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, natural gas comprised 3% of our revenues. A decline in natural gas prices could
negatively affect our future growth, particularly for future gas sales where we may not be able to secure or extend our current
long-term contracts.

Lower oil and natural gas prices may impact our revenues on a per unit basis and may also reduce the amount of oil and
natural gas that can be produced economically. In addition, changes in oil and natural gas prices can impact the valuation of
our reserves and, in periods of lower commodity prices, we may curtail production and capital spending or may defer or delay
drilling wells because of lower cash generation. Lower oil and natural gas prices could also affect our growth, including future
and  pending  acquisitions. A  substantial  or  extended  decline  in  oil  or  natural  gas  prices  could  adversely  affect  our  business,
financial condition, and results of operations.

Continuing our hedging strategy, we entered into derivative financial instruments with the intent to partially mitigate our
exposure to oil price risk. These derivatives were placed with major financial institutions and commodity traders, under ISDA
Master Agreements and Credit Support Annexes.

6

Table of Contents

To  the  extent  that  we  engage  in  oil  price  risk  management  activities  to  partially  protect  ourselves  from  declines  in  oil
price, we may be prevented from realizing the benefits of oil price increases above the levels of the zero-premium collars used
to manage oil price risk.

As market values of these derivatives fluctuate, we may post or receive variation cash collaterals with our counterparties.
In the event of a significant decrease in the market value of the derivatives, we may have to post cash collateral, if they exceed
our  available  credit  lines.  Even  though  cash  collateral  is  returned  to  us  upon  reductions  in  the  underlying  Brent  oil  price,
having to post cash collaterals could affect our near-term liquidity needs. As of the date of this annual report, we have no cash
collateral posted related to our commodity risk management contracts. See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
for details regarding Commodity Risk Management Contracts.

Low oil prices may impact our operations and corporate strategy.

We  face  limitations  on  our  ability  to  increase  prices  or  improve  margins  on  the  oil  and  natural  gas  that  we  sell. As  a
consequence  of  the  oil  price  crisis  which  started  in  the  first  half  of  2020  (WTI  and  Brent,  the  main  international  oil  price
markers, fell by more than 45% between December 2019 and March 2020), we immediately took decisive measures to ensure
our  ability  to  both  maximize  ongoing  projects  and  to  preserve  our  cash,  such  as  reducing  our  work  program  and  made
adjustments  to  our  operating  and  administrative  costs,  with  continuous  monitoring  to  adjust  further  if  necessary.  While  oil
prices  have  rebounded  since  then,  they  may  continue  to  be  volatile  and  thus,  we  develop  multiple  scenarios  for  our  capital
expenditure plan. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook”.

Funding our anticipated capital expenditures relies in part on oil prices remaining close to our estimates or higher levels
and other factors to generate sufficient cash flow. Low oil prices affect our revenues, which in turn affect our debt capacity
and  the  covenants  in  our  financing  agreements,  as  well  as  the  amount  of  cash  we  can  borrow  using  our  oil  reserves  as
collateral,  the  amount  of  cash  we  are  able  to  generate  from  current  operations  and  the  amount  of  cash  we  can  obtain  from
prepayment agreements. If we are not able to generate the sales which, together with our current cash resources, are sufficient
to  fund  our  capital  program,  we  will  not  be  able  to  efficiently  execute  our  work  program,  which  would  cause  us  to  further
decrease our work program and would harm our business outlook, investor confidence and our share price.

In addition, actions taken by the company to maximize ongoing projects and to reduce expenses, including renegotiations
and  reduction  of  oil  and  gas  service  contracts  and  other  initiatives  such  as  cost  cutting  may  expose  us  to  claims  and
contingencies  from  interested  parties  that  may  have  a  negative  impact  on  our  business,  financial  condition,  results  of
operations and cash flows. If oil prices are lower than expected, we may be unable to meet our contractual obligations with oil
and service contracts and suppliers. Equally, those third parties may be unable to meet their contractual obligations to us as a
result of the oil price crisis, impacting on our operations.

In budgeting for our future activities, we have relied on a number of assumptions, including, with regard to our discovery
success rate, the number of wells we plan to drill, our working interests in our prospects, the costs involved in developing or
participating in the development of a prospect, the timing of third-party projects and our ability to obtain needed financing
with  respect  to  any  further  acquisitions  and  the  availability  of  both  suitable  equipment  and  qualified  personnel.  These
assumptions  are  inherently  subject  to  significant  business,  political,  economic,  regulatory,  environmental,  and  competitive
uncertainties, conditions in the financial markets, contingencies, and risks, all of which are difficult to predict and many of
which are beyond our control. In addition, we opportunistically seek out new assets and acquisition targets to complement our
existing  operations  and  have  financed  such  acquisitions  in  the  past  through  the  incurrence  of  additional  indebtedness,
including additional bank credit facilities, equity issuances or the sale of minority stakes in certain operations to our partners.
We may need to raise additional funds more quickly if one or more of our assumptions prove to be incorrect or if we choose to
expand  our  hydrocarbon  asset  acquisition,  exploration,  appraisal  or  development  efforts  more  rapidly  than  we  presently
anticipate,  and  we  may  decide  to  raise  additional  funds  even  before  we  need  them  if  the  conditions  for  raising  capital  are
favorable.  The  ultimate  amount  of  capital  that  we  will  expend  may  fluctuate  materially  based  on  market  conditions,  our
continued  production,  decisions  by  the  operators  in  blocks  we  do  not  operate,  the  success  of  our  drilling  results  and  future
acquisitions. Our future financial condition and liquidity will be impacted by, among other factors, our level of production of
oil  and  natural  gas  and  the  prices  we  receive  from  the  sale  thereof,  the  success  of  our  exploration  and  appraisal  drilling
program, the number of commercially viable oil and natural gas discoveries made

7

Table of Contents

and the quantities of oil and natural gas discovered, the speed with which we can bring such discoveries to production and the
actual cost of exploration, appraisal and development of our oil and natural gas assets.

Unless we replace our oil and natural gas reserves, our reserves and production will decline over time. Our business is
dependent  on  our  continued  successful  identification  of  productive  fields  and  prospects  and  the  identified  locations  in
which we drill in the future may not yield oil or natural gas in commercial quantities.

Production from oil and gas properties declines as reserves are depleted, with the rate of decline depending on reservoir
characteristics.  Accordingly,  our  current  proved  reserves  will  decline  as 
these  reserves  are  produced.  As  of
December 31, 2023, our reserves-to-production (or reserve life) ratio for net proved reserves in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil
was  5.3  years.  According  to  D&M  estimates,  if  on  January  1,  2024,  we  ceased  all  drilling  and  development  activities,
including  recompletions,  refracs  and  workovers,  our  proved  developed  producing  reserves  base  in  Colombia,  Ecuador  and
Brazil would decline 26% during the first year.

Our future oil and natural gas reserves and production, and therefore our cash flows and income, are highly dependent on
our  success  in  efficiently  developing  our  current  reserves  and  using  cost-effective  methods  to  find  or  acquire  additional
recoverable reserves. While we have had success in identifying and developing commercially exploitable fields and drilling
locations in the past, we may be unable to replicate that success in the future. We may not identify any more commercially
exploitable fields or successfully drill, complete or produce more oil or gas reserves, and the wells which we have drilled, and
currently plan to drill within our blocks or concession areas, may not discover or produce any further oil or gas or may not
discover or produce additional commercially viable quantities of oil or gas to enable us to continue to operate profitably. If we
are unable to replace our current and future production, the value of our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial
condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales to a few key customers.

In  Colombia,  we  allocate  our  sales  on  a  competitive  basis  to  industry  leading  participants  including  traders  and  other
producers.  During  2023,  the  oil  and  gas  production  was  sold  to  three  clients  which  concentrate  96%  of  the  Colombian
subsidiaries’ revenue (accounting for 89% of the consolidated revenue). Delivery points include wellhead and other locations
on  the  Colombian  pipeline  system  for  the  Llanos  Basin  production. The  Putumayo  Basin  production  is  delivered  to  clients
FOB  in  Esmeraldas,  Ecuador,  and  to  the  Colombian  pipeline  system  in  case  of  contingencies  in  Ecuador  that  affect  the
transport  through  the  Ecuadorian  pipeline  system.  We  manage  our  counterparty  credit  risk  associated  to  sales  contracts  by
performing  periodic  evaluations  of  our  counterparties’  credit  profile  and,  in  certain  contracts,  including  early  payment
conditions to minimize the exposure.

In Ecuador, oil is transported through the Ecuadorian pipeline system, with Esmeraldas as the delivery point, and 100% of
the sales are exported on a competitive basis to industry leading participants including traders and other producers. Sales of
crude oil in Ecuador accounted for 3% of our consolidated revenue.

In Brazil, the gas production from the Manati Field is sold to Petrobras, the Brazilian State-owned company, which is the
operator of the Manati Field (accounting for 2% of our consolidated revenue). See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Significant Agreements—Brazil—Petrobras Natural Gas Purchase Agreement.”

If any of our buyers were to decrease or cease purchasing oil or gas from us, or if any of them were to decide not to renew
their  contracts  with  us  or  to  renew  them  at  a  lower  sales  price,  this  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,
financial condition, and results of operations. For example, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview
—Significant Agreements—Colombia”.

Our results of operations could be materially adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Although most of our revenues are denominated in US$, unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates for
certain of our expenses in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. An
appreciation of local currencies can increase our costs and negatively impact our results from operations.

8

Table of Contents

Because our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in US$, we must translate revenues, expenses and income,

as well as assets and liabilities, into US$ at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period.

  From  time  to  time,  we  enter  into  derivative  financial  instruments  in  order  to  anticipate  any  currency  fluctuation  with
respect to income taxes to be paid during the first half of the following year. No currency risk management contracts were in
place as of December 31, 2023, and onwards. In January 2023, we entered into derivative financial instruments (zero-premium
collars)  with  local  banks  in  Colombia,  for  an  amount  equivalent  to  US$38.0  million  in  order  to  anticipate  any  currency
fluctuation with respect to a portion of the estimated income taxes to be paid in April and June 2023.

There are inherent risks and uncertainties relating to the exploration and production of oil and natural gas.

Our  performance  depends  on  the  success  of  our  exploration  and  production  activities  and  on  the  existence  of  the
infrastructure that will allow us to take advantage of our oil and gas reserves. Oil and natural gas exploration and production
activities  are  subject  to  numerous  risks  beyond  our  control,  including  the  risk  that  exploration  activities  will  not  identify
commercially  viable  quantities  of  oil  or  natural  gas.  Our  decisions  to  purchase,  explore,  develop,  or  otherwise  exploit
prospects  or  properties  will  depend  in  part  on  the  evaluation  of  seismic  and  other  data  obtained  through  geophysical,
geochemical and geological analysis, production data and engineering studies, the results of which are often inconclusive or
subject to varying interpretations.

Furthermore,  the  marketability  of  any  oil  and  natural  gas  production  from  our  projects  may  be  affected  by  numerous
factors beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, proximity and capacity of pipelines and other means
of  transportation,  the  availability  of  upgrading  and  processing  facilities,  equipment  availability  and  government  laws  and
regulations (including, without limitation, laws and regulations relating to prices, sale restrictions, taxes, governmental stake,
allowable  production,  importing  and  exporting  of  oil  and  natural  gas,  environmental  protection  and  health  and  safety). The
effect of these factors, individually or jointly, cannot be accurately predicted, but may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.

There  can  be  no  assurance  that  our  drilling  programs  will  produce  oil  and  natural  gas  in  the  quantities  or  at  the  costs
anticipated,  or  that  our  currently  producing  projects  will  not  cease  production,  in  part  or  entirely.  Drilling  programs  may
become uneconomic due to an increase in our operating costs or as a result of a decrease in market prices for oil and natural
gas. Our actual operating costs or the actual prices we may receive for our oil and natural gas production may differ materially
from current estimates. In addition, even if we are able to continue to produce oil and gas, there can be no assurance that we
will have the ability to market our oil and gas production. See “—Our inability to access needed equipment and infrastructure
in a timely manner may hinder our access to oil and natural gas markets and generate significant incremental costs or delays in
our oil and natural gas production” below.

Our  identified  potential  drilling  location  inventories  are  scheduled  over  many  years,  making  them  susceptible  to
uncertainties that could materially alter the occurrence or timing of their drilling.

Our management team has specifically identified and scheduled certain potential drilling locations as an estimate of our
future  multi-year  drilling  activities  on  our  existing  acreage.  These  identified  potential  drilling  locations,  including  those
without proved undeveloped reserves, represent a significant part of our growth strategy.

Our ability to drill and develop these identified potential drilling locations depends on a number of factors, including oil
and natural gas prices, the availability and cost of capital, drilling and production costs, the availability of drilling services and
equipment, drilling results, lease expirations, the availability of gathering systems, marketing and transportation constraints,
refining capacity, regulatory approvals and other factors. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these factors, there can be no
assurance that the numerous potential drilling locations we have identified will ever be drilled or, if they are, that we will be
able to produce oil or natural gas from these or any other potential drilling locations.

9

Table of Contents

Our business requires significant capital investment and maintenance expenses, which we may be unable to finance on
satisfactory terms or at all.

Because  the  oil  and  natural  gas  industry  is  capital  intensive,  we  expect  to  make  substantial  capital  expenditures  in  our
business and operations for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas reserves. See “Item 4. Information on the
Company—B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook.” We incurred capital expenditures of US$199.0 million and
US$168.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Factors Affecting our Results of Operations—Discovery and exploitation of
reserves.”

The actual amount and timing of our future capital expenditures may differ materially from our estimates as a result of,
among other things, commodity prices, actual drilling results, the availability of drilling rigs and other equipment and services,
and regulatory, technological and competitive developments. In response to changes in commodity prices, we may increase or
decrease  our  actual  capital  expenditures.  For  example,  as  a  result  of  the  oil  price  decline  in  2020  we  adjusted  the  capital
expenditures  program  for  that  year  to  US$65-75  million,  approximately  a  60%  reduction  from  prior  preliminary  estimates
(approximately US$180-200 million).

We  intend  to  finance  our  future  capital  expenditures  through  cash  generated  by  our  operations  and  potential  future
financing  arrangements.  However,  our  financing  needs  may  require  us  to  alter  or  increase  our  capitalization  substantially
through the issuance of debt or equity securities or the sale of assets.

If our capital requirements vary materially from our current plans, we may require further financing. In addition, we may
incur  significant  financial  indebtedness  in  the  future,  which  may  involve  restrictions  on  other  financing  and  operating
activities. We may also be unable to obtain financing or financing on terms favorable to us, including as a result of financial
institutions having lower capital availability or potentially higher interest rates. These changes could cause our cost of doing
business to increase, limit our ability to pursue acquisition opportunities, reduce cash flow used for drilling and place us at a
competitive disadvantage. A significant reduction in cash flows from operations or the availability of credit could materially
adversely affect our ability to achieve our planned growth and operating results.

Oil and gas operations contain a high degree of risk, and we may not be fully insured against all risks we face in our
business.

Oil and gas exploration and production is uncertain and involves a high degree of risk and hazards. Our operations may
be disrupted by risks and hazards that are beyond our control and that are common among oil and gas companies, including
environmental  hazards,  blowouts,  industrial  accidents,  occupational  safety  and  health  hazards,  technical  failures,  labor
disputes,  nationwide  or  regional  social  protests  or  blockades,  unusual  or  unexpected  geological  formations,  flooding,
earthquakes and extended interruptions due to weather conditions, explosions and other accidents.

While we believe that we maintain customary insurance coverage for companies engaged in similar operations, we are not
fully insured against all risks in our business because certain risks, such as public order related issues or natural disasters, are
not subject to insurance coverage because they are not under our control. In addition, insurance that we do, and plan to, carry
may contain significant exclusions from and limitations on coverage. We may elect not to obtain certain non-mandatory types
of insurance if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. The occurrence of a
significant  event  or  a  series  of  events  against  which  we  are  not  fully  insured,  and  any  losses  or  liabilities  arising  from
uninsured  or  underinsured  events  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  or  results  of
operations.

The development schedule of oil and natural gas projects is subject to cost overruns and delays.

Oil  and  natural  gas  projects  may  experience  capital  cost  increases  and  overruns  due  to,  among  other  factors,  the
unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs and other essential equipment, supplies, personnel, and oil field services. The cost to
execute projects may not be properly established and remains dependent upon a number of factors, including the

10

Table of Contents

completion of detailed cost estimates and final engineering, contracting and procurement costs. The development of projects
may be materially adversely affected by one or more of the following factors:

● shortages of equipment, materials and labor;

● fluctuations in the prices of construction materials;

● delays in delivery of equipment and materials;

● labor disputes;

● political events;

● title problems;

● obtaining easements and rights of way;

● blockades or embargoes;

● litigation;

● compliance  with  governmental  laws  and  regulations,  including  environmental,  health  and  safety  laws  and

regulations;

● adverse weather conditions;

● unanticipated increases in costs;

● natural disasters;

● epidemics or pandemics;

● accidents;

● transportation;

● unforeseen engineering and drilling complications;

● delays during prior consultation processes;

● delays attributable to the operator of the project;

● environmental or geological uncertainties; and

● other unforeseen circumstances.

Any of these events or other unanticipated events could give rise to delays in development and completion of our projects

and cost overruns.

For example, during 2023:

11

Table of Contents

● the Indico 6 and Indico 7 wells, which were drilled in the CPO-5 Block in late 2022, were shut-in from January to
September  2023,  following  the ANH’s  request  that  the  operator  suspend  production  until  certain  required  surface
facilities were completed;

● the environmental licensing processes in Putumayo (Colombia) were affected between April and November 2023, by
the  suspension  of  the  public  hearings  due  to  lack  of  adequate  security  conditions,  which  affected  the  start  of
operations in the PUT-8 Block and caused delays in the planned drilling campaign; and

● the drilling and completion costs for the Tigana Norte 50 and Tigui 74 wells in our Llanos 34 Block in Colombia
included  delays  and  overruns  of  US$0.4  million  and  US$  0.6  million,  respectively,  caused  by  local  community
blockades.

Additionally, we may not be able to follow the development schedules we believe are optimal for blocks in which we are

not the operator, such as the CPO-5 Block, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Delays  in  the  construction  and  commissioning  of  projects  or  other  technical  difficulties  may  result  in  future  projected
target dates for production being delayed or further capital expenditures being required. These projects may often require the
use of new and advanced technologies, which can be expensive to develop, purchase and implement and may not function as
expected. Such uncertainties and operating risks associated with development projects could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Competition  in  the  oil  and  natural  gas  industry  is  intense,  which  makes  it  difficult  for  us  to  attract  capital,  acquire
properties and prospects, market oil and natural gas and secure trained personnel.

We  compete  with  the  major  oil  and  gas  companies  engaged  in  the  exploration  and  production  sector,  including  state-
owned exploration and production companies that possess greater financial and technical resources than we do for researching
and  developing  exploration  and  production  technologies  and  access  to  markets,  equipment,  labor  and  capital  required  to
acquire, develop and operate our properties. We also compete for the acquisition of licenses and properties in the countries
where we operate.

Our competitors may be able to pay more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects and to
evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or personnel resources allow.
Our competitors may also be able to offer better compensation packages to attract and retain qualified personnel than we are
able to offer. In addition, there is substantial competition for capital available for investment in the oil and natural gas industry.
As  a  result  of  each  of  the  aforementioned,  we  may  not  be  able  to  successfully  compete  in  acquiring  prospective  reserves,
developing  reserves,  marketing  hydrocarbons,  attracting  and  retaining  quality  personnel  or  raising  additional  capital,  which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on
the Company—B. Business Overview—Our competition.”

Our estimated oil and gas reserves are based on assumptions that may prove inaccurate.

Our oil and gas reserves estimate in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile as of December 31, 2023, is based on the D&M
Reserves  Report. Although  classified  as  “proved  reserves,”  the  reserves  estimate  set  forth  in  the  D&M  Reserves  Reports  is
based  on  certain  assumptions  that  may  prove  inaccurate.  DeGolyer  and  MacNaughton’s  primary  economic  assumptions  in
estimates included oil and gas sales prices determined according to SEC guidelines, future expenditures and other economic
assumptions (including interests, royalties and taxes) as provided by us.

Oil  and  gas  reserves  engineering  is  a  subjective  process  of  estimating  accumulations  of  oil  and  gas  that  cannot  be
measured  in  an  exact  way,  and  estimates  of  other  engineers  may  differ  materially  from  those  set  out  herein.  Numerous
assumptions and uncertainties are inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and gas reserves, including projecting future
rates of production, timing and amounts of development expenditures and prices of oil and gas, many of which are beyond our
control. Post estimate drilling, testing and production results may require revisions. For example, if we are unable to sell our
oil and gas to customers, this may impact the estimate of our oil and gas reserves. Accordingly, reserves

12

Table of Contents

estimates are often materially different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered, and if such recovered
quantities are substantially lower than the initial reserves estimate, this could have a material adverse impact on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.

Our inability to access needed equipment and infrastructure in a timely manner may hinder our access to oil and natural
gas markets and generate significant incremental costs or delays in our oil and natural gas production.

Our  ability  to  market  our  oil  and  natural  gas  production  depends  substantially  on  the  availability  and  capacity  of
processing facilities, transportation facilities (such as pipelines, crude oil unloading stations and trucks) and other necessary
infrastructure, which may be owned and operated by third parties. Our failure to obtain such facilities on acceptable terms or
on a timely basis could materially harm our business. We may be required to shut down oil and gas wells because access to
transportation or processing facilities may be limited or unavailable when needed. If that were to occur, we would be unable to
realize revenue from those wells until arrangements were made to deliver the production to the market, which could cause a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the shutting down of wells
can lead to mechanical problems upon bringing the production back on-line, potentially resulting in decreased production and
increased  remediation  costs.  The  exploitation  and  sale  of  oil  and  natural  gas  and  liquids  will  also  be  subject  to  timely
commercial processing and marketing of these products, which depends on the contracting, financing, building and operating
of infrastructure by us and third parties.

In  Colombia,  producers  of  crude  oil  have  historically  suffered  from  trucking  transportation  logistics  issues  and  limited
pipeline and storage capacity, which cause delays in delivery and transfer of title of crude oil. To reduce this exposure, we and
our  partner  in  the  Llanos  34  Block  have  constructed  a  flowline  to  evacuate  crude  oil  from  the  Jacana  field,  reducing
transportation  costs,  blockade  risks  and  supporting  our  sustainable  performance  by  reducing  carbon  emissions. Throughout
2023,  we  were  impacted  by  repeated  strikes  carried  out  by  communities  requesting  attention  to  their  needs  through  the
obstruction  of  routes  we  typically  use  for  the  evacuation  of  crude  oil  through  tanker  trucks.  While  we  have  been  able  to
continue to evacuate our production through evacuation alternatives such as the Oleoducto del Casanare Pipeline (“ODCA”)
pipeline,  without  significantly  affecting  the  production  of  our  fields,  if  both  transportation  alternatives  are  simultaneously
affected  and  we  are  unable  to  evacuate  our  production,  our  access  to  the  markets  may  be  hindered  and  this  could  cause  a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.

In the case of our Putumayo Basin production, we have also reduced our exposure to trucking issues by implementing the
use  of  flowlines  alongside  trucking  to  gather  our  production  at  the  Platanillo  Block  and  transport  it  via  the  Oleoducto
Binacional Amerisur (“OBA”) pipeline that connects us to the Ecuador pipeline system.

Trucking transportation was part of our crude delivery strategy during 2023 and will continue to be part of our strategy in
the future. Although we were able to enable alternative delivery points and transport oil by trucks, avoiding any significant
negative impact in our production during this period, we cannot assure we would be able to do so in the future.

In Ecuador, our oil production is transported through the existing pipeline infrastructure. While the Ecuadorian pipeline
system is well-developed and has operated reliably in the past, we cannot guarantee this will be the case in the future. Also, as
production in Ecuador increases, available capacity may be limited. An inability to access transport capacity could adversely
affect our production levels or the transport costs associated with getting our production to the market.

While Brazil has a well-developed network of hydrocarbon pipelines, storage and loading facilities, we may not be able to
access  these  facilities  when  needed.  Pipeline  facilities  in  Brazil  are  often  full  and  seasonal  capacity  restrictions  may  occur,
particularly in natural gas pipelines. Our gas production from the Manati Field is transported on Petrobras-operated pipelines.
If those pipelines became unavailable, our overall production levels in the Manati Field would be negatively impaired.

13

Table of Contents

We  may  suffer  delays  or  incremental  costs  due  to  difficulties  in  negotiations  with  landowners  and  local  communities,
including indigenous communities, where our reserves are located.

Access to the sites where we operate requires agreements (including easements, rights-of-way and access authorizations),
primarily with the owners of the lands on which we intend to develop our operational projects. If we are unable to negotiate
easements with landowners, we may have to go to court to obtain access to the sites of our operations, which may delay the
progress of our operations at such sites.

In Colombia, although we have agreements with many landowners and ongoing negotiations with others, the economic
expectations of landowners have generally increased concomitant with direct negotiations, which may result in delayed access
to  existing  or  future  sites.  Additionally,  local  communities  and  other  stakeholders  in  the  territory,  such  as  workers'
associations, trade unions and unions for activities related to the industry, are leading demands to the operators, beyond what
is legally established, sometimes exerting pressures under de facto means or blockades to operational activities. Although oil
and gas companies are managing these situations and stakeholder expectations in the territory, it ultimately becomes necessary
to  establish  agreements  for  the  viability  of  the  operations,  which  on  occasions  translates  into  higher  execution  costs.
Additionally, there are demands for improvements of transport infrastructure and the addressing of unsatisfied basic needs that
have been historically ignored by the authorities and the fulfillment of such demands may be redirected towards the oil and
gas companies.

In Putumayo (Colombia), where we have operating sites, there is presence of illegal groups which may pressure farmers
to oppose the control and eradication of illicit crops, and instrumentalize the oil and gas industry with blockades, seeking to
draw the attention of the national government and prevent the eradication of these crops.

As  part  of  its  international  commitments,  the  Colombian  government  may  seek  to  enhance  the  participatory  phases  of
hydrocarbon  projects,  which  could  broaden  the  parameters  of  community  participation  and  access  to  information  and
ultimately affect project timelines. Furthermore, local communities’ expectations may increase because of several reforms the
government has announced. If the government reforms do not meet the communities’ expectations, the pressure to reform may
shift to the oil and gas industry.

The expectations and demands of local communities on oil and gas companies operating in Colombia may also increase.
As a result, local communities have demanded that oil and gas companies invest in fixing and improving public access roads,
compensate  them  for  any  damages  related  to  use  of  such  roads  and,  more  generally,  invest  in  infrastructure  which  is
commonly paid for with public funds. Due to these circumstances, oil and gas companies in Colombia, including us, are now
dealing  with  increasing  difficulties  resulting  from  instances  of  social  unrest,  temporary  road  blockades  and  conflicts  with
landowners.

In  addition,  community  and  indigenous  protests  and  blockades  may  arise  near  our  operations,  which  could  adversely

affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Other  legal  proceedings  such  as  land  restitution,  a  judicial  process  implemented  because  of  the  peace  agreement  in

Colombia, focus on returning illegally held land to its rightful owners, may delay access to future sites.

There can be no assurance that disputes with landowners and local communities or legal proceedings will not delay our
operations or that any agreements we reach with such landowners and local communities or legal proceedings in the future
will not require us to incur additional costs, thereby materially adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Local communities may also protest or take actions that restrict or cause their elected government to restrict our
access to the sites of our operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our operations at such sites.

14

Table of Contents

Under the terms of some of our various E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements, we
are  obligated  to  drill  wells,  declare  any  discoveries,  and  file  periodic  reports  to  retain  our  rights  and  establish
development areas. Failure to meet these obligations may result in the loss of our interests in the undeveloped parts of
our blocks or concession areas.

To  protect  our  exploration  and  production  rights  in  our  license  areas,  we  must  meet  various  drilling  and  declaration
requirements.  In  general,  unless  we  make  and  declare  discoveries  within  periods  specified  in  our  various  special  operation
contracts (E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements), our interests in the undeveloped parts
of  our  license  areas  may  lapse.  Should  the  prospects  we  have  identified  under  these  contracts  and  agreements  yield
discoveries, we may face delays in drilling these prospects or be required to relinquish them. The costs to maintain or operate
the E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements over such areas may fluctuate and may increase
significantly,  and  we  may  not  be  able  to  meet  our  commitments  under  such  contracts  and  agreements  on  commercially
reasonable  terms  or  at  all,  which  may  force  us  to  forfeit  our  interests  in  such  areas.  For  example,  in  2023,  we  transferred
commitments from certain blocks to others and asked for termination of certain E&P contracts. See “Item 4. Information on
the Company—B. Business Overview—Our operations—Operations in Colombia.”

Historically, a significant amount of our reserves or production have been derived from our operations in certain blocks,
including various blocks in the Llanos and Putumayo Basins in Colombia, the Espejo and Perico Blocks in the Oriente Basin
in Ecuador, the BCAM-40 Concession in the Camamu-Almada Basin in Brazil and the Fell Block in the Magallanes Basin in
Chile.

For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  the  different  blocks  in  the  Llanos  Basin  contained  85.1%  of  our  net  proved
reserves and generated 84.2% of our production, the Platanillo Block in the Putumayo Basin contained 4.8% of our net proved
reserves and generated 5.8% of our production, the Espejo and Perico Blocks in the Oriente Basin contained 3.5% of our net
proved reserves and generated 2.5% of our production, the BCAM-40 Concession in the Camamu-Almada Basin contained
2.3% of our net proved reserves and generated 2.8% of our production and the Fell Block in the Magallanes Basin contained
4.4%  of  our  net  proved  reserves  and  generated  4.7%  of  our  total  production.  While  our  continuing  expansion  with  new
exploratory  blocks  incorporated  in  our  portfolio  and  the  recent  divestment  of  our  operations  in  Chile  mean  that  the  above-
mentioned blocks may be expected to be a less significant component of our overall business, we cannot be sure that we will
be able to continue diversifying our reserves and production. Resulting from these, any government intervention, impairment,
or disruption of our production due to factors outside of our control or any other material adverse event in our operations in
such blocks would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our contracts in obtaining rights to explore and develop oil and natural gas reserves are subject to contractual expiration
dates and operating conditions, and our E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements are
subject to early termination in certain circumstances.

Under  certain  E&P  contracts,  production  sharing  contracts  and  concession  agreements  to  which  we  are  or  may  in  the
future become parties, we are or may become subject to guarantees to perform our commitments and/or to make payment for
other obligations, and we may not be able to obtain financing for all such obligations as they arise. If such obligations are not
complied  with  when  due,  in  addition  to  any  other  remedies  that  may  be  available  to  other  parties,  this  could  result  in
cancelation of our E&P contracts, production sharing contracts and concession agreements or dilution or forfeiture of interests
held by us. As of December 31, 2023, the aggregate outstanding amount of this potential liability for guarantees was US$70.7
million,  mainly  related  to  capital  commitments  in  the  Llanos  34,  Platanillo,  Llanos  87,  PUT-8,  Llanos  86,  and  Llanos  104
Blocks in Colombia, the Espejo and Perico Blocks in Ecuador, and the Campanario Block in Chile. See “Item 4. Information
on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our operations” and Note 33.2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additionally, certain E&P contracts, production sharing contracts and concession agreements to which we are or may in
the future become a party are subject to set expiration dates. Although we may want to extend some of these contracts beyond
their original expiration dates, there is no assurance that we can do so on terms that are acceptable to us or at all, although
some of these agreements contain provisions enabling exploration extensions.

15

Table of Contents

In  Colombia,  our  E&P  contracts  are  subject  to  early  termination  for  a  breach  by  the  parties,  a  default  declaration,
application of any of the contracts’ unilateral termination clauses or pursuant to termination clauses mandated by Colombian
law. Anticipated termination declared by the ANH results in the immediate enforcement of monetary guaranties against us and
may result in an action for damages by the ANH and/or a restriction on our ability to engage in contracts with the Colombian
government during a certain period of time. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Significant
Agreements—Colombia—E&P  contracts.” To  avoid  the  breach  of  an  E&P  contract  due  to  unfulfillment  of  our  exploration
commitments, regulation gives us options such as the ability to transfer or credit those commitments to other E&P contracts,
subject to meeting certain regulatory conditions.

In  Ecuador,  our  production  sharing  contracts  may  be  subject  to  early  termination  in  case  of  breach  of  the  obligations
under  the  contract,  non-performance  of  the  exploratory  commitments  or  unjustified  suspension  of  the  operations,  lack  of
remediation  of  environmental  damages  or  unauthorized  assignment  of  a  working  interest  under  the  production  sharing
contracts, among others, as specified under the laws of the contract. The declaration of an early termination is subject to prior
due  process,  which  would  allow  us  to  remedy  any  hypothetical  breach  claimed  against  us,  or  to  present  our  defense
allegations. A declaration of early termination will cause forfeiture of equipment and facilities and enforcement of monetary
guarantees.

In  Brazil,  concession  agreements  in  the  production  phase  generally  may  be  renewed  at  the  ANP’s  discretion  for  an
additional  period,  provided  that  a  renewal  request  is  made  at  least  12  months  prior  to  the  termination  of  the  concession
agreement  and  there  has  not  been  a  breach  of  the  terms  of  the  concession  agreement.  We  expect  that  all  our  concession
agreements  will  provide  for  early  termination  in  the  event  of:  (i)  government  expropriation  for  reasons  of  public  interest;
(ii) revocation of the concession pursuant to the terms of the concession agreement; or (iii) failure by us or our partners to
fulfill  all  our  respective  obligations  under  the  concession  agreement  (subject  to  a  cure  period). Administrative  or  monetary
sanctions may also be applicable, as determined by the ANP, which shall be imposed based on applicable law and regulations.
In the event of early termination of a concession agreement, the compensation to which we are entitled may not be sufficient
to compensate us for the full value of our assets. Moreover, in the event of early termination of any concession agreement due
to failure to fulfill obligations thereunder, we may be subject to fines and/or other penalties.

Early  termination  or  nonrenewal  of  any  E&P  contract,  production  sharing  agreements  or  concession  agreement  could

have a material adverse effect on our business, financial situation, or results of operations.

We are not, and may not be in the future, the sole owner or operator of all our licensed areas and do not, and may not in
the  future,  hold  all  the  working  interests  in  some  of  our  licensed  areas.  Therefore,  we  may  not  be  able  to  control  the
timing of exploration or development efforts, associated costs, or the rate of production of any non-operated and, to an
extent, any non-wholly owned, assets.

We  are  not  the  operator  or  sole  owner  of  all  the  blocks  included  in  our  portfolio.  See  “Item  4.  Information  on  the
Company—B. Business Overview—Operations in Colombia”, “—Operations in Ecuador”, “—Operations in Brazil” and “—
Operations  in Argentina”.  Therefore,  certain  decisions  are  not  under  our  sole  discretion  and  need  to  be  agreed  to  with  our
partners. Accordingly, our decision-making capabilities may be limited to the extent our partner operators or owners have any
limitations with respect to any proposed action or plan.

In addition, the terms of the joint operations agreements or association agreements governing our other partners’ interests
in  almost  all  of  the  blocks  that  are  not  wholly  owned  or  operated  by  us  require  that  certain  actions  be  approved  by
supermajority vote. The terms of our other current or future license or venture agreements may require at least the majority of
working interests to approve certain actions. As a result, we may have limited ability to exercise influence over operations or
prospects  in  the  blocks  operated  by  our  partners,  or  in  blocks  that  are  not  wholly  owned  or  operated  by  us.  A  breach  of
contractual obligations by our partners who are the operators of such blocks could eventually affect our rights in exploration
and  production  contracts  in  some  of  our  blocks  in  Colombia,  Ecuador  and  Brazil.  Our  dependence  on  our  partners  could
prevent us from achieving our target returns for those discoveries or prospects.

Moreover,  as  we  are  not  the  sole  owner  or  operator  of  all  our  properties,  we  may  not  be  able  to  control  the  timing  of
exploration or development activities or the amount of capital expenditures and may therefore not be able to carry out our key
business strategies of minimizing the cycle time between discovery and initial production at such properties. The

16

Table of Contents

success and timing of exploration and development activities operated by our partners will depend on a number of factors that
will be largely outside of our control, including:

● the timing and amount of capital expenditures;

● the operator’s expertise and financial resources;

● approval of other block partners in drilling wells;

● the scheduling, pre-design, planning, design and approvals of activities and processes;

● selection of technology; and

● the rate of production of reserves, if any.

This  limited  ability  to  exercise  control  over  the  operations  on  some  of  our  license  areas  may  cause  a  material  adverse

effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

For instance, we are not the operator of the CPO-5 Block, and do not control the execution of the development schedule.
Any delays in the execution schedule of the CPO-5 Block could have a material adverse effect in our financial condition and
results of operation. For example, the Indico 6 and Indico 7 wells, which were drilled in the CPO-5 Block in late 2022, were
shut-in  from  January  to  September  2023,  following  the  ANH’s  request  that  the  operator  suspend  production  until  certain
required surface facilities were completed.

Acquisitions that we have completed, and any future acquisitions, strategic investments, partnerships, or alliances could
be  difficult  to  integrate  and/or  identify,  could  divert  the  attention  of  key  management  personnel,  disrupt  our  business,
dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our financial results, including impairment of goodwill and other intangible
assets.

One of our principal business strategies includes acquisitions of properties, prospects, reserves and leaseholds and other
strategic  transactions,  including  in  jurisdictions  in  which  we  do  not  currently  operate.  The  successful  acquisition  and
integration  of  producing  properties  requires  an  assessment  of  several  factors,  including  recoverable  reserves,  future  oil  and
natural gas prices, development and operating costs, and potential environmental and other liabilities.

The accuracy of these assessments is inherently uncertain. In connection with these assessments, we perform a review of
the subject properties that we believe to be generally consistent with industry practices. Our review and the review of advisors
and independent reserves engineers will not reveal all existing or potential problems, nor will it permit us or them to become
sufficiently familiar with the properties to fully assess their deficiencies and potential recoverable reserves. Inspections may
not always be performed on every well, and environmental conditions are not necessarily observable even when an inspection
is undertaken. We, advisors or independent reserves engineers may apply different assumptions when assessing the same field.
Even when problems are identified, the seller may be unwilling or unable to provide effective contractual protection against
all or part of the problems. We often are not entitled to contractual indemnification for environmental liabilities and acquire
properties on an “as is” basis. Even in those circumstances in which we have contractual indemnification rights for pre-closing
liabilities, it remains possible that the seller will not be able to fulfill its contractual obligations. There can be no assurance that
problems  related  to  the  assets  or  management  of  the  companies  and  operations  we  have  acquired,  or  operations  we  may
acquire or add to our portfolio in the future, will not arise in future, and these problems could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Significant acquisitions, and other strategic transactions may involve other risks, including:

● diversion  of  our  management’s  attention  to  evaluating,  negotiating  and  integrating  significant  acquisitions  and

strategic transactions;

17

Table of Contents

● challenge  and  cost  of  integrating  acquired  operations,  information  management  and  other  technology  systems  and

business cultures with ours while carrying on our ongoing business;

● contingencies and liabilities that could not be or were not identified during the due diligence process, including with

respect to possible deficiencies in the internal controls of the acquired operations; and

● challenge of attracting and retaining personnel associated with acquired operations.

It  is  also  possible  that  we  may  not  identify  suitable  acquisition  targets  or  strategic  investment,  partnership,  or  alliance
candidates. Our inability to identify suitable acquisition targets, strategic investments, partners or alliances, or our inability to
complete  such  transactions,  may  negatively  affect  our  competitiveness  and  growth  opportunities.  Moreover,  if  we  fail  to
properly evaluate acquisitions, alliances, or investments, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such transaction,
and we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate.

Future acquisitions financed with our own cash could deplete the cash and working capital available to adequately fund
our  operations  and  return  value  to  shareholders.  We  may  also  finance  future  transactions  through  debt  financing,  oil
prepayment agreements, the issuance of our equity securities, existing cash, cash equivalents or investments, or a combination
of  the  foregoing. Acquisitions  financed  with  the  issuance  of  our  equity  securities  could  be  dilutive,  which  could  affect  the
market price of our stock. Acquisitions financed with debt could require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to
principal and interest payments and could subject us to restrictive covenants.

The present value of future net revenues from our proved reserves will not necessarily be the same as the current market
value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves.

You should not assume that the present value of future net revenues from our proved reserves is the current market value
of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we have based the estimated discounted
future net revenues from our proved reserves on the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average of the first day-of-the-month
price  for  the  preceding  12  months. Actual  future  net  revenues  from  our  oil  and  natural  gas  properties  will  be  affected  by
factors such as actual prices we receive for oil and natural gas, actual cost of development and production expenditures, the
amount and timing of actual production, and changes in governmental regulations and taxation.

The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses in connection with the development and production of
oil and natural gas properties will affect the timing and amount of actual future net revenues from proved reserves, and thus
their actual value. In addition, the 10% discount factor we use when calculating discounted future net revenues may not be the
most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with us or the oil and
natural gas industry in general.

The  development  of  our  proved  undeveloped  reserves  may  take  longer  and  may  require  higher  levels  of  capital
expenditures than we currently anticipate. Therefore, our proved undeveloped reserves ultimately may not be developed
or produced.

As of December 31, 2023, 73% of our net proved reserves are developed. Development of our undeveloped reserves may
take  longer  and  require  higher  levels  of  capital  expenditures  than  we  currently  anticipate.  Additionally,  delays  in  the
development  of  our  reserves  or  increases  in  costs  to  drill  and  develop  such  reserves  will  reduce  the  standardized  measure
value of our estimated proved undeveloped reserves and future net revenues estimated for such reserves, and may result in
some  projects  becoming  uneconomic,  causing  the  quantities  associated  with  these  uneconomic  projects  to  no  longer  be
classified as reserves. This was due to the uneconomic status of the reserves, given the proximity to the end of the concessions
for these blocks, which does not allow for future capital investment in the blocks. There can be no assurance that we will not
experience  similar  delays  or  increases  in  costs  to  drill  and  develop  our  reserves  in  the  future,  which  could  result  in  further
reclassifications of our reserves.

18

Table of Contents

We  are  exposed  to  the  credit  risks  of  our  customers  and  any  material  nonpayment  or  nonperformance  by  our  key
customers could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Our customers may experience financial problems that could have a significant negative effect on their creditworthiness.
Severe financial problems encountered by our customers could limit our ability to collect amounts owed to us, or to enforce
the performance of obligations owed to us under contractual arrangements.

The combination of declining cash flows as a result of declines in commodity prices, a reduction in borrowing basis under
reserves-based credit facilities and the lack of availability of debt or equity financing may result in a significant reduction of
our customers’ liquidity and limit their ability to make payments or perform on their obligations to us.

Some  of  our  customers  may  be  highly  leveraged,  and,  in  any  event,  are  subject  to  their  own  operating  expenses.
Therefore,  the  risk  we  face  in  doing  business  with  these  customers  may  increase.  Other  customers  may  also  be  subject  to
regulatory changes, which could increase the risk of defaulting on their obligations to us. Financial problems experienced by
our  customers  could  result  in  the  impairment  of  our  assets,  a  decrease  in  our  operating  cash  flows  and  may  also  reduce  or
curtail our customers’ future use of our products and services, which may have an adverse effect on our revenues and may lead
to a reduction in reserves.

Our operations are subject to operating hazards, including extreme weather events, which could expose us to potentially
significant losses.

Our  operations  are  subject  to  potential  operating  hazards,  extreme  weather  conditions  and  risks  inherent  to  drilling
activities,  seismic  registration,  exploration,  production,  development  and  transportation  and  storage  of  crude  oil,  such  as
explosions,  fires,  car  and  truck  accidents,  floods,  labor  disputes,  social  unrest,  community  protests  or  blockades,  guerilla
attacks, security breaches, pipeline ruptures and spills and mechanical failure of equipment at our or third-party facilities. Any
of these events could have a material adverse effect on our exploration and production operations or disrupt transportation or
other process-related services provided by our third-party contractors. For example, during 2023, we incurred in higher energy
costs in the Llanos 34 Block due to a drought that affected the energy matrix in Colombia as a result of decreased availability
of hydroelectric power.

We  are  highly  dependent  on  certain  members  of  our  management  and  technical  team,  including  our  geologists  and
geophysicists, and on our ability to hire and retain new qualified personnel.

The  ability,  expertise,  judgment  and  discretion  of  our  management  and  our  technical  and  engineering  teams  are  key  in
discovering and developing oil and natural gas resources. Our performance and success are dependent to a large extent upon
key members of our management and exploration team, and their loss or departure would be detrimental to our future success.
In addition, our ability to manage our anticipated growth depends on our ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel. Our
ability to retain our employees is influenced by the economic environment and the remote locations of our exploration blocks,
which may enhance competition for human resources where we conduct our activities, thereby increasing our turnover rate.
There  is  strong  competition  in  our  industry  to  hire  employees  in  operational,  technical,  and  other  areas,  and  the  supply  of
qualified employees is limited in the regions where we operate and throughout Latin America generally. The loss of any of our
key  management  or  other  key  employees  of  our  technical  team  or  our  inability  to  hire  and  retain  new  qualified  personnel
could have a material adverse effect on us.

We and our operations are subject to numerous environmental, social, health and safety laws, regulations and rulings,
which may result in material liabilities and costs.

We  and  our  operations  are  subject  to  various  international,  foreign,  federal,  state,  and  local  environmental,  health  and
safety  laws  and  regulations  governing,  among  other  things,  the  emission  and  discharge  of  pollutants  into  the  ground,  air  or
water; the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation and disposal of regulated materials; and human health and safety.
Our operations are also subject to certain environmental risks that are inherent in the oil and gas industry, and which may arise
unexpectedly and result in material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Breach of
environmental  laws  could  result  in  environmental  administrative  investigations  and/or  lead  to  the  termination  of  our
concessions and contracts. Other potential consequences include fines and/or criminal or civil environmental

19

Table of Contents

actions. For instance, non-governmental organizations may bring actions against us or other oil and gas companies in order to,
among other things, halt our activities in any of the countries in which we operate or require us to pay fines. Additionally, in
Colombia,  environmental  licenses  are  administrative  acts  subject  to  class  actions  that  could  eventually  result  in  their
cancellation, with potential adverse impacts on our E&P contracts.

The  Regional Agreement  on Access  to  Information,  Public  Participation  and  Justice  in  Environmental  Matters  in  Latin
America and the Caribbean, also known as the Escazú Agreement, is an international human rights treaty that was signed by
all the countries in which we operate and has been ratified by all, except for Brazil, where pressure has been growing for the
government to ratify. We expect the countries where the agreement has been ratified will proceed to regulate the agreement
and  such  regulations  may  include  additional  processes  on  participation  and  information,  which  could  directly  affect  our
operations  as  it  could  require  additional  processes  that  take  time.  Nonetheless,  current  Colombian  processes  require  minor
adjustments to comply with Escazú Agreement with regards to private involvement and we have extensive experience on such
processes.  The  agreement  also  increases  the  protection  of  human  rights  and  environmental  activists,  protection  which  we
believe is much required in the countries where we operate and is aligned with our commitment to human rights.

We are subject to national and regional environmental regulations and specific environmental requirements as part of the
licenses and permits that we must obtain for our operations. We have mechanisms to assure the fulfillment of all those legal
obligations such as a permanent external audit, a dedicated environmental team, and our environmental management system.
The evidence of the fulfillment of such obligations is consolidated in the yearly environmental reports that are issued to the
environmental  authorities  and  correspond  to  public  information.  In  addition,  we  are  subject  to  yearly  visits  by  the
environmental  national  authority. Although  we  fulfill  the  requirements,  sometimes  we  have  not  been  and  may  not  be  at  all
times in complete compliance with some of them due to causes not attributable to us. This is the case of the offset obligations
we have to implement to compensate the residual impacts that cannot be avoided, minimized or restored, in which we have to
consider  a  concertation  process  with  different  stakeholders  that  could  take  more  time  than  what  the  regulation  provides.
Nevertheless,  we  report  the  progress  and  we  define  action  plans  to  demonstrate  our  diligence  and  reduce  the  possibility  of
sanctions, penalties or fines related to a delay in our fulfillment of the obligations, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We  have  contracted  with  and  intend  to  continue  to  hire  third  parties  to  perform  services  related  to  our  operations.  We
could  be  held  liable  for  some  or  all  environmental,  health  and  safety  costs  and  liabilities  arising  out  of  our  actions  and
omissions as well as those of our block partners, third-party contractors, predecessors, or other operators. To the extent we do
not  address  these  costs  and  liabilities  or  if  we  do  not  otherwise  satisfy  our  obligations,  our  operations  could  be  suspended,
terminated, or otherwise adversely affected. Although we screen our contractors regarding their compliance on several issues,
there is a risk that we may contract with third parties with unsatisfactory environmental, health and safety records or that our
contractors  may  be  unwilling  or  unable  to  cover  any  losses  associated  with  their  acts  and  omissions.  During  2023,  we
approved and adopted a Supplier Code of Conduct under which we define the minimum obligations and behaviors expected
from our contractors and suppliers, aiming to address the risk.

Releases  of  regulated  substances  may  occur  and  can  be  significant.  Under  certain  environmental  laws  and  regulations
applicable  to  us  in  the  countries  in  which  we  operate,  we  could  be  held  responsible  for  all  the  costs  relating  to  any
contamination  at  our  past  and  current  facilities  and  at  any  third-party  waste  disposal  sites  used  by  us  or  on  our  behalf.
Pollution  resulting  from  waste  disposal,  emissions  and  other  operational  practices  might  require  us  to  remediate
contamination, or retrofit facilities, at substantial cost. We also could be held liable for any and all consequences arising out of
human  exposure  to  such  substances  or  for  other  damage  resulting  from  the  release  of  hazardous  substances  to  the
environment,  property  or  to  natural  resources,  or  affecting  endangered  species  or  sensitive  environmental  areas.  We  are
currently required to, and in the future may need to, plug and abandon sites in certain blocks in each of the countries in which
we operate, which could result in substantial costs.

In  addition,  we  expect  continued  and  increasing  attention  to  climate  change  issues. Various  countries  and  regions  have
agreed to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases including methane (a primary component of natural gas) and carbon dioxide
(a  byproduct  of  oil  and  natural  gas  combustion).  The  regulation  of  greenhouse  gases  and  the  physical  impacts  of  climate
change  in  the  areas  in  which  we,  our  customers  and  the  end-users  of  our  products  operate  could  adversely  impact  our
operations and the demand for our products.

20

Table of Contents

We have set a target to reduce operational Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 35-40 percent by year-end 2025 and by 40-
60 percent by year-end 2030 from a 2020 baseline. We also have a long-term ambition to achieve net zero Scope 1 and 2 GHG
emissions from operations by 2050. Our ability to meet these targets is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and actions
taken  in  implementing  such  targets  and  ambition  may  also  expose  us  to  certain  additional  and/or  heightened  financial  and
operational  risks,  which  is  also  dependent  on  how  we  grow.  Furthermore,  the  long-term  ambition  of  reaching  net  zero
emissions by 2050 is inherently less certain due to the longer timeframe and certain factors outside of our control, including
the commercial application of future technologies that may be necessary to achieve this long-term ambition. A reduction in
GHG emissions relies on, among other things, the ability to develop, access and implement commercially viable and scalable
emission reduction strategies and related technology and products, as well as our ability to participate in projects that capture
carbon and reduce our footprint. If we are unable to implement these strategies and technologies as planned without negatively
impacting expected operations or cost structures, or such strategies or technologies do not perform as expected, we may be
unable to meet the 2025 and 2030 GHG reduction targets or the 2050 net zero emissions ambition on the current timelines, or
at all.

In  addition,  achieving  the  2025  and  2030  GHG  reduction  targets  and  the  2050  net  zero  ambition  relies  on  a  stable
regulatory framework and will require capital expenditures and resources, with the potential that actual costs may differ from
the  original  estimates  and  the  differences  may  be  material.  Furthermore,  the  cost  of  investing  in  emissions-reduction
technologies,  and  the  resultant  change  in  the  deployment  of  resources  and  focus,  could  have  a  negative  impact  on  future
operating and financial results, or could result in a differentiator for the company and our products.

Environmental,  health  and  safety  laws  and  regulations  are  complex  and  change  frequently,  and  our  costs  of  complying
with  such  laws  and  regulations  may  adversely  affect  our  results  of  operations  and  financial  condition.  See  “Item  4.
Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Health, safety and environmental matters” and “Item 4. Information
on the Company—B. Business Overview—Industry and regulatory framework.”

Changing investor sentiment towards fossil fuels may affect our operations, impact the price of our common shares and
limit our access to financing and insurance.

A number of factors, including the concerns of the effects of the use of fossil fuels on climate change, the impact of oil
and gas operations on the environment, environmental damage relating to spills of petroleum products during transportation
and indigenous rights, have affected certain investors' sentiments towards investing in the oil and gas industry.

As  a  result  of  these  concerns,  some  institutional,  retail,  and  public  investors  have  announced  that  they  no  longer  are
willing  to  fund  or  invest  in  oil  and  gas  properties  or  companies  or  are  reducing  the  amount  thereof  over  time.  In  addition,
certain  institutional  investors  are  requesting  that  issuers  develop  and  implement  more  robust  social,  environmental  and
governance  policies  and  practices.  Although  we  have  in  place  strong  and  robust  social,  environmental  and  governance
practices,  developing  and  implementing  even  broader  policies  and  practices  can  involve  significant  costs  and  require  a
significant time commitment from our Board, management and employees. Failing to implement the policies and practices as
requested by institutional investors may result in such investors reducing their investment in our Company or not investing in
our Company at all.

Any reduction in the investor base interested or willing to invest in the oil and gas industry and more specifically, our
Company,  may  result  in  limiting  our  access  to  capital  and  insurance,  increasing  the  cost  of  capital  and  insurance,  and
decreasing  the  price  and  liquidity  of  our  common  shares  even  if  our  operating  results,  underlying  asset  values  or  prospects
have not changed. Additionally, these factors, as well as other related factors, may cause a decrease in the value of our assets
which may result in an impairment charge.

Legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing and other drilling activities for unconventional oil
and  gas  resources  could  increase  the  future  costs  of  doing  business,  cause  delays  or  impede  our  plans,  and  materially
adversely affect our operations.

Hydraulic fracturing of unconventional oil and gas resources is a process that involves injecting water, sand, and small

volumes of chemicals into the wellbore to fracture the hydrocarbon-bearing rock thousands of feet below the surface to

21

Table of Contents

facilitate a higher flow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore. We may eventually contemplate, after obtaining due environmental
approvals,  such  use  of  hydraulic  fracturing  in  the  production  of  oil  and  natural  gas  from  certain  reservoirs.  Legislation  and
regulatory  initiatives  relating  to  hydraulic  fracturing  and  other  drilling  activities  for  unconventional  oil  and  gas  resources
could  increase  the  future  costs  of  doing  business,  cause  delays  or  impede  our  plans,  and  materially  adversely  affect  our
operations.

In Colombia, during the second half of 2022, the Council of State (the highest administrative court) issued a decision by
which  it  denied  the  claims  that  were  seeking  nullity  of  the  regulation  for  “non-conventional  hydrocarbons”.  Therefore,  the
regulation for unconventional oil and gas resources in Colombia is in force and with full effects. However, the government is
seeking to prohibit fracking techniques in Colombia and, during the second half of 2022, a bill of law to forbid fracking and
exploitation  of  unconventional  hydrocarbons  was  filed  in  Congress.  The  bill  of  law  is  pending  two  debates  in  one  of  the
chambers of Congress (house of representatives) and it is highly probable that the project is approved and sanctioned as a law.

We  currently  are  not  aware  of  any  proposals  in  Ecuador,  Brazil  or  Chile  to  regulate  hydraulic  fracturing  beyond  the
regulations already in place. However, various initiatives in other countries with substantial shale gas resources have been or
may be proposed or implemented to, among other things, regulate hydraulic fracturing practices, limit water withdrawals and
water use, require disclosure of fracturing fluid constituents, restrict which additives may be used, or implement temporary or
permanent bans on hydraulic fracturing. If any of the countries in which we operate adopts similar laws or regulations, which
is something we cannot predict right now, such adoption could significantly increase the cost of, impede or cause delays in the
implementation of any plans to use hydraulic fracturing for unconventional oil and gas resources.

Our indebtedness and other commercial obligations could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to raise
additional  capital  and  prevent  us  from  fulfilling  our  obligations  under  our  existing  agreements  and  borrowing  of
additional funds.

As  of  December  31,  2023,  we  had  US$501.0  million  outstanding  amount  of  indebtedness  on  a  consolidated  basis,

consisting of our Notes due 2027.

Our indebtedness could:

● limit  our  capacity  to  satisfy  our  obligations  with  respect  to  our  indebtedness,  and  any  failure  to  comply  with  the
obligations  of  our  debt  instruments,  including  restrictive  covenants  and  borrowing  conditions,  could  result  in  an
event of default under the agreements governing our indebtedness;

● require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payments on our indebtedness,
thereby  reducing  the  availability  of  our  cash  flow  to  fund  acquisitions,  working  capital,  capital  expenditures  and
other general corporate purposes;

● place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to certain of our competitors that have less debt;

● limit our ability to borrow additional funds;

● in the case of our secured indebtedness, if any, lose assets securing such indebtedness upon the exercise of security

interests in connection with a default;

● make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business or the economy; and

● limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our operations or business and the industry in which we

operate.

22

Table of Contents

The  indenture  governing  our  Notes  due  2027  includes  covenants  restricting  dividend  payments  and  other  shareholder
distributions.  For  a  description,  see  “Item  5.  Operating  and  Financial  Review  and  Prospects—B.  Liquidity  and  Capital
Resources—Indebtedness.”

As a result of these restrictive covenants, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be
unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs. We have in the past been unable
to meet incurrence tests under the indenture governing our prior notes, which limited our ability to incur indebtedness. Failure
to comply with the restrictive covenants included in our Notes due 2027 would not trigger an event of default.

Similar restrictions could apply to us and our subsidiaries when we refinance or enter into new debt agreements which

could intensify the risks described above.

Our business could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity threats and related disruptions.

We rely on information technology systems, including systems which are managed or provided by third-party providers,
to  conduct  our  business  and  support  our  exploration,  development,  and  production  activities.  We  increasingly  depend  on
digital  technologies,  such  as  applications,  a  cloud  environment,  mobile  platforms,  computers,  and  telecommunications
systems. We collect, use, transmit, store, and otherwise process data using information technology systems, including systems
owned and maintained by us or our third-party providers. These data include confidential information and intellectual property
belonging to us or our customers or other business partners.

All  information  technology  systems  are  subject  to  disruptions,  outages,  failures,  and  security  breaches  or  incidents. A
breach or failure of our digital infrastructure, control systems, or cyber defenses, or those of our third-party providers, as a
result  of  negligence,  intentional  misconduct,  or  otherwise,  could  seriously  disrupt  our  operations.  We  and  our  third-party
providers  have  experienced,  and  expect  to  continue  to  experience,  cybersecurity  attacks.  Cybersecurity  attacks  may  range
from  employee  or  contractor  error  or  misuse  or  unauthorized  use  of  information  technology  systems  or  confidential
information,  to  individual  attempts  to  gain  unauthorized  access  to  these  information  systems,  to  sophisticated  cybersecurity
attacks,  known  as  advanced  persistent  threats,  any  of  which  may  target  us  directly  or  indirectly  through  our  third-party
providers.  Despite  employee  training  and  other  measures  to  mitigate  vulnerabilities,  our  employees  have  been  and  will
continue  to  be  targeted  by  parties  using  fraudulent  “spam”,  “scam”,  “phishing”  and  “spoofing”  emails  to  misappropriate
information  or  to  introduce  viruses  or  other  malware  programs  to  our  technology  environment.  Cybersecurity  attacks  are
increasing in number worldwide, and the attackers are increasingly organized and well-financed, or at times supported by state
actors. Our industry is subject to fast-evolving risks from cyber-threat actors, including states, criminals, terrorists, hacktivists,
and  insiders.  To  the  extent  artificial  intelligence  capabilities  improve  and  are  increasingly  adopted,  they  may  be  used  to
identify vulnerabilities and craft increasingly sophisticated cybersecurity attacks. Vulnerabilities may be introduced from the
use of artificial intelligence by us, our customers, suppliers and other business partners and third-party providers.

We continuously devote significant resources to network security, data loss prevention, and other measures to protect our
systems  and  data  from  unauthorized  access  or  misuse,  and  we  may  be  required  to  expend  greater  resources  in  the  future,
especially in the face of evolving and increasingly sophisticated cybersecurity threats and laws, regulations, and other actual
and asserted obligations to which we are or may become subject relating to privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity.

We may be unable to anticipate, prevent, or remediate future attacks, vulnerabilities, breaches, or incidents, and in some
instances,  we  may  be  unaware  of  vulnerabilities  or  cybersecurity  breaches  or  incidents  or  their  magnitude  and  effects,
particularly as attackers are becoming increasingly able to circumvent controls and remove forensic evidence. Cybersecurity
incidents  may  result  in  business  disruption;  delay  in  the  development  and  delivery  of  our  products;  disruption  of  our
production  processes,  internal  communications,  interactions  with  customers  and  suppliers  and  processing  and  reporting
financial results; the theft or misappropriation of intellectual property; corruption, loss of, or inability to access (e.g., through
ransomware  or  denial  of  service)  confidential  information,  trade  secrets,  proprietary  information,  personal  information,  and
other critical data (i.e., that of our company and our third-party providers and customers); reputational damage; private claims,
demands, and litigation or regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, or other

23

Table of Contents

proceedings  related  to  contractual  or  regulatory  privacy,  cybersecurity,  data  protection,  or  other  confidentiality  obligations;
diminution in the value of our investment in research, development and engineering; and increased costs associated with the
implementation of cybersecurity measures to detect, deter, protect against, and recover from such incidents. Furthermore, the
need  for  rapid  detection  of  attempts  to  gain  unauthorized  access  to  our  digital  infrastructure,  often  through  the  use  of
sophisticated  and  coordinated  means,  presents  a  challenge  we  must  face  and  any  delay  or  failure  to  detect  cyber  incidents
could compound potential harms. This could result in significant and compounding losses due to the cost of remediation and
reputational consequences.

Our efforts to comply with, and changes to, laws, regulations, and contractual and other actual and asserted obligations
concerning privacy, cybersecurity, and data protection, including developing restrictions on cross-border data transfer and data
localization,  could  result  in  significant  expense,  and  any  actual  or  alleged  failure  to  comply  could  result  in  inquiries,
investigations,  and  other  proceedings  against  us  by  regulatory  authorities  or  other  third  parties.  Customers  and  third-party
providers 
increasingly  demand  rigorous  contractual  provisions  regarding  privacy,  cybersecurity,  data  protection,
confidentiality, and intellectual property, which may increase our overall compliance burden. With respect to certain potential
incidents, such as a cyber-attack or data breach, we are covered under a cybersecurity insurance. However, no assurances can
be made as to whether the insurance policy is sufficient in coverage or amount to cover all our potential liability.

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted our business, financial condition, and results of our operations, the global
economy, and the demand for and prices of oil and natural gas. The uncertainty of the impact an endemic or pandemic
disease may have makes it impossible for us to identify all potential risks related to the pandemic or estimate the ultimate
adverse impact that the pandemic may have on our business.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the actions taken by third parties, including, but not limited to, governmental authorities,
businesses,  and  consumers,  in  response  to  the  pandemic  adversely  impacted  the  global  economy  and  created  significant
volatility  in  the  global  financial  markets.  The  COVID-19  pandemic  resulted  in  significant  volatility  in  the  financial  and
commodities markets worldwide, including the dramatic drop in the price of crude oil during 2020. In the event of a potential
resurgence  of  the  COVID-19  pandemic,  responsive  measures  may  be  implemented  and  further  disruptions  to  the  global
economy, demand, supply chain and others may occur.

As  of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  we  believe  we  have  implemented  adequate  operational  measures  (such  as  remote
working procedures) to avoid or minimize major disruptions to our business. However, our operations rely on our workforce
being able to access our wells, structures and facilities located upon or used in connection with our oil and gas blocks. The
uncertainty of the impact that an endemic or pandemic disease may have makes it impossible for us to identify all potential
risks related to an endemic or pandemic disease and we cannot assure if, and to what extent, our business, financial condition,
cash  flows  or  results  of  operations  may  be  adversely  impacted  by  any  potential  resurgence  or  outbreak  of  the  COVID-19
pandemic, or any other regional or global outbreaks related to any other endemic or pandemic disease.

The  COVID-19  pandemic  and  its  unprecedented  consequences  amplified,  and  may  continue  to  amplify,  the  other  risks

identified in this annual report.

We operate in an industry with climate related risks.

The oil and gas industry, where we operate, is particularly exposed to risks arising from climate change and the energy
transition, such as volatility of products prices, possible new regulations that may restrict our operations, and an increase in
extreme weather events that affect our ability to operate.

Moreover, our main assets are in countries like Colombia and Ecuador, where the risks related to the occurrence of natural
hazards such as floods, landslides and droughts are high and expected to increase in the following years. For example, during
2023, we incurred in higher energy costs in the Llanos 34 Block due to a drought that affected the energy matrix in Colombia
as a result of decreased availability of hydroelectric power.

24

Table of Contents

We operate in areas of significant biodiversity value.

Some of our operations are in or adjacent to areas with significant biodiversity value, some of which are being considered
for designation as conservation or protected areas. This could require modifications to our plans in order to adapt our projects
to the environmental conditions and the allowed use of the land, which may increase viability costs and delay our timelines.
We  carry  out  detailed  due  diligence  processes  to  mitigate  the  potential  impacts  derived  from  this  risk,  but  there  are  factors
outside of our control, such as local politics and political decisions.

We operate in areas that have historical and current ties to indigenous peoples.

We  operate  in  highly  culturally  diverse  areas,  which  brings  us  and  our  operations  in  close  contact  with  different
indigenous  groups. This  means  we  may  need  to  carry  out  prior  consultation  processes  aligned  with  local  regulations.  Such
processes  may  cause  delays  in  planned  activities,  thereby  affecting  our  operations  and  may  lead  to  claims  from  indigenous
peoples,  including  those  who  have  not  been  certified  by  the  competent  authorities,  claims  of  alleged  violations  of  human
rights and may encourage requests for expansion of territories and precautionary measures to protect the rights of indigenous
peoples, among others.

During 2022 and 2023, as part of our exploration projects and based on certifications of the origin of prior consultation
issued  by  the  directorate  of  the  national  authority  for  prior  consultation  of  the  Ministry  of  the  Interior,  we  have  made
advancements  in  the  development  of  consultation  processes  in  the  department  of  Meta  with  the  Resguardo, Turpial  and  La
Victoria communities for the Golondrina development area project in the Llanos 86 and Llanos 104 Blocks. The agreements
that resulted from the prior consultation process were documented and protocolized in August 2023. The prior consultation
processes for the seismic acquisition program in those blocks is currently in the follow-up stage. In 2023, we made progress
towards  closing  the  prior  consultation  processes  for  the  2D  and  3D  seismic  acquisition  program  in  the  Coati  Block  with
indigenous communities from Santa Rosa del Guamuez, Yarinal, San Marcelino, Campo Alegre del Afilador and Parcialidad
Nueva Palestina in the department of Putumayo.

Exploration blocks in the Putumayo area carry significant costs related to biodiversity management and reputational risk
due to overlapping claims of rightful ownership.

Costs related to mitigation and offset measures to protect the habitat could be greater than currently anticipated due to the
sensitivity of the biodiversity and the legal requirements imposed by the environmental authority. Nevertheless, we design our
exploration  and  production  projects  while  considering  the  conditions  of  the  environment  and  avoiding  any  disruption  to
natural forest coverage and ecosystems connectivity.

Several of the oil and gas development and exploration blocks in the Putumayo area in Colombia overlap with indigenous
territories  that  are  either  formalized  or  are  being  considered  for  formal  titling  of  tribal  lands  under  the  Colombian  land
restitution law.

We  have  identified  a  material  weakness  in  our  internal  control  related  to  ineffective  information  technology  general
controls which could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

In connection with the preparation of our financial statements as of December 31, 2023, we concluded there is a material
weakness in our internal control related to ineffective information technology general controls (ITGCs). Notwithstanding, we
have  also  concluded  that  the  material  weakness  did  not  result  in  any  identified  misstatements  to  the  consolidated  financial
statements, and there were no changes to previously released financial results. To remediate our material weakness, we have
been implementing and will continue to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the
material  weakness  are  remediated,  such  that  these  controls  are  designed,  implemented,  and  operating  effectively.  If  our
remedial  measures  are  insufficient  to  address  the  material  weakness,  or  if  additional  material  weaknesses  or  significant
deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our financial statements may
contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results.

For further details on controls and remedial actions, see "Item 15. Controls and Procedures."

25

Table of Contents

Risks relating to the countries in which we operate

Our operations may be adversely affected by political and economic circumstances in the countries in which we operate
and in which we may operate in the future.

All  of  our  current  operations  are  located  in  South America.  If  local,  regional  or  worldwide  economic  trends  adversely
affect the economy of any of the countries in which we have investments or operations, our financial condition and results
from operations could be adversely affected.

The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) has forecasted a regional growth of 1.9% in
2024, after a 2.2% growth in 2023, indicating that the region would stay on a path of low growth, which means job creation
would decelerate and informality and gender gaps would persist, among other effects. These projections reflect, in part, low
dynamism in economic growth and global trade, which translates into a limited impetus from the global economy. Although
inflation  has  declined,  the  interest  rates  of  the  main  developed  economies  have  not,  which  means  that  financing  costs  have
remained at high levels throughout the year, and they are expected to stay that way in coming years. Furthermore, this low
growth is also attributable to the limited domestic space for fiscal and monetary policy faced by the region’s countries. In this
regard, it is emphasized that while public debt levels have declined, they remain high, and this, coupled with the increase in
financing costs, restricts fiscal space. In the monetary arena, inflation continues to decline in the region, but monetary policy
still has a restrictive bias, due to the effects that rate cuts could have on capital flows and the exchange rate, given that high
interest rates are still in effect in developed countries.

Oil and natural gas exploration, development and production activities are subject to political and economic uncertainties
(including but not limited to changes in energy policies or the personnel administering them), changes in laws and policies
governing operations of foreign-based companies, expropriation of property, cancellation or modification of contract rights,
revocation of consents or approvals, the obtaining of various approvals from regulators, foreign exchange restrictions, price
controls, currency fluctuations, royalty increases and other risks arising out of foreign governmental sovereignty, as well as to
risks  of  loss  due  to  civil  strife,  acts  of  war  and  community-based  actions,  such  as  protests  or  blockades,  guerilla  activities,
terrorism,  acts  of  sabotage,  territorial  disputes  and  insurrection.  In  addition,  we  are  subject  both  to  uncertainties  in  the
application of the tax laws in the countries in which we operate and to possible changes in such tax laws (or the application
thereof), each of which could result in an increase in our tax liabilities. These risks are higher in developing countries, such as
those in which we conduct our activities.

The  main  economic  risks  we  face  and  may  face  in  the  future  because  of  our  operations  in  the  countries  in  which  we

operate include the following:

● difficulties incorporating movements in international prices of crude oil and exchange rates into domestic prices;

● the possibility that a deterioration in Colombia’s, Ecuador’s and Brazil’s relations with multilateral credit institutions,
such as the International Monetary Fund, will impact negatively on capital controls, and result in a deterioration of
the business climate;

● inflation,  exchange  rate  movements  (including  devaluations),  exchange  control  policies  (including  restrictions  on

remittance of dividends), price instability and fluctuations in interest rates;

● liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

● tax policies; and

● the possibility that we may become subject to restrictions on repatriation of earnings from the countries in which we

operate in the future.

In  addition,  our  operations  in  these  areas  increase  our  exposure  to  risks  of  guerilla  and  other  illegal  armed  group

activities, social unrest, local economic conditions, political disruption, civil disturbance, community protests or

26

Table of Contents

blockades,  expropriation,  tribal  conflicts  and  governmental  policies  that  may:  disrupt  our  operations;  require  us  to  incur
greater  costs  for  security;  restrict  the  movement  of  funds  or  limit  repatriation  of  profits;  lead  to  U.S.  government  or
international sanctions; limit access to markets for periods of time; or influence the market’s perception of the risk associated
with investments in these countries.

Some  countries  where  we  operate  have  experienced,  and  may  continue  to  experience,  political  instability,  and  losses
caused by these disruptions may not be covered by insurance. During 2022, Colombia and Ecuador experienced social and
political turmoil, including riots, nationwide protests, strikes and street demonstrations against their governments which led to
acts  of  violence  and  social  and  political  tensions.  Future  protests  could  adversely  and  materially  affect  the  Colombian  and
Ecuadorian  economies  and  our  businesses  in  those  countries.  Consequently,  our  exploration,  development  and  production
activities may be substantially affected by factors which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition. We cannot guarantee that current programs and policies that apply to the oil and gas industry will remain
in effect.

Our  operations  may  also  be  adversely  affected  by  laws  and  policies  of  the  jurisdictions  in  which  we  do  business,  that
affect foreign trade and taxation, and by uncertainties in the application of, possible changes to (or to the application of) tax
laws in these jurisdictions. For example, in 2022, the Colombian government enacted a tax reform that materially affected the
oil producing companies. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Changes in any of these laws or policies or the implementation thereof, and uncertainty over potential changes in policy
or  regulations  affecting  any  of  the  factors  mentioned  above  or  other  factors  in  the  future  may  increase  the  volatility  of
domestic securities markets and securities issued abroad by companies operating in these countries, which could materially
and  adversely  affect  our  financial  position,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows.  Furthermore,  we  may  be  subject  to  the
exclusive  jurisdiction  of  courts  outside  the  United  States  or  may  not  be  successful  in  subjecting  non-U.S.  persons  to  the
jurisdiction of courts in the United States, which could adversely affect the outcome of such dispute. Changes in tax laws may
result  in  increases  in  our  tax  payments,  which  could  materially  adversely  affect  our  profitability,  restrict  our  ability  to  do
business in our existing and target markets and cause our results of operations to suffer. There can be no assurance that we will
be  able  to  maintain  our  projected  cash  flow  and  profitability  following  any  increase  in  taxes  applicable  to  us  and  to  our
operations.

We depend on maintaining good relations with the respective host governments and national oil companies in each of
our countries of operation.

The success of our business and the effective operation of the fields in each of our countries of operation depend upon
continued  good  relations  and  cooperation  with  applicable  governmental  authorities  and  agencies,  including  national  oil
companies  such  as  Ecopetrol,  Petroecuador  and  Petrobras.  For  instance,  our  Brazilian  operations  in  BCAM-40  Concession
provide  us  with  a  long-term  off-take  contract  with  Petrobras,  the  Brazilian  state-owned  company  that  covers  100%  of  net
proved  gas  reserves  in  the  Manati  Field,  one  of  the  largest  non-associated  gas  fields  in  Brazil.  If  we,  the  respective  host
governments and the national oil companies are not able to cooperate with one another, it could have an adverse impact on our
business, operations and prospects.

Oil and natural gas companies in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil operate and have a working and/or economic interest
over, yet do not own any of the oil and natural gas reserves in such countries.

Under Colombian, Ecuadorian and Brazilian law, all onshore and offshore hydrocarbon resources in these countries are
owned by the respective sovereign. Although we are the operator of the majority of the blocks and concessions in which we
have a working and/or economic interest and generally have the power to make decisions as how to market the hydrocarbons
we  produce,  the  Colombian,  Ecuadorian  and  Brazilian  governments  have  full  authority  to  determine  the  rights,  royalties  or
compensation to be paid by or to private investors for the exploration or production of any hydrocarbon reserves located in
their respective countries.

If  these  governments  were  to  restrict  or  prevent  concessionaires,  including  us,  from  exploiting  oil  and  natural  gas
reserves, or otherwise interfered with our exploration through regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploration and
production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, expropriation of property,

27

Table of Contents

environmental legislation or health and safety, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.

Additionally,  we  are  dependent  on  receipt  of  government  approvals  or  permits  to  develop  the  concessions  we  hold  in
some countries. There can be no assurance that future political conditions in the countries in which we operate will not result
in changes to policies with respect to foreign development and ownership of oil and gas, environmental protection, health and
safety  or  labor  relations,  which  may  negatively  affect  our  ability  to  undertake  exploration  and  development  activities  in
respect of present and future properties, as well as our ability to raise funds to further such activities. Any delays in receiving
government approvals in such countries may delay our operations or may affect the status of our contractual arrangements or
our ability to meet contractual obligations.

Oil and gas operators are subject to extensive regulation in the countries in which we operate.

The Colombian, Ecuadorian and Brazilian hydrocarbons industries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by
their respective governments in matters such as the environment, social responsibility, tort liability, health and safety, labor,
the  award  of  exploration  and  production  contracts,  the  imposition  of  specific  drilling  and  exploration  obligations,  taxation,
foreign  currency  controls,  price  controls,  export  and  import  restrictions,  capital  expenditures  and  required  divestments.  In
some countries in which we operate, such as Colombia, we are required to pay a percentage of our expected production to the
government  as  royalties.  See  “Item  4.  Information  on  the  Company—B.  Business  Overview—Industry  and  regulatory
framework—Colombia” and see Note 33.1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

For example, in Brazil there is potential liability for personal injury, property damage and other types of damages. Failure
to  comply  with  these  laws  and  regulations  also  may  result  in  the  suspension  or  termination  of  operations  or  our  being
subjected to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and expected results of operations. We expect to also operate in a consortium in some of our concessions, which, under the
Brazilian  Petroleum  Law,  establishes  joint  and  strict  liability  among  consortium  members,  and  failure  to  maintain  the
appropriate licenses may result in fines from the ANP, ranging from R$5 thousand to R$500 million. In addition, there is a
contractual requirement in Brazilian concession agreements regarding local content, which has become a significant issue for
oil  and  natural  gas  companies  operating  in  Brazil  given  the  penalties  related  with  breaches  thereof.  The  local  content
requirement  will  also  apply  to  the  production  sharing  contract  regime.  See  “Item  4.  Information  on  the  Company—B.
Business Overview—Our operations—Operations in Brazil.”

Significant expenditures may be required to ensure our compliance with governmental regulations related to, among other
things,  licenses  for  drilling  operations,  environmental  matters,  drilling  bonds,  reports  concerning  operations,  the  spacing  of
wells, unitization of oil and natural gas accumulations, local content policy and taxation.

Colombia has experienced and continues to experience internal security issues that have had or could have a negative
effect on the Colombian economy.

Despite  the  demobilization  and  disarmament  that  occurred  because  of  the  2016  peace  agreement,  factors  of  instability
persist in the territory, such as the presence of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the National Liberation
Army (ELN) dissident forces and other illegal armed groups that seek to control drug trafficking and other illegal activities.
The current government’s intention to solidify peace agreements with all criminal elements may cause an escalation of violent
incidents, damage to infrastructure and social mobilizations that may have adverse effects on the country’s economy.

The  ELN  has  targeted  crude  oil  pipelines  in  Colombia,  including  the  Caño  Limón-Coveñas  pipeline,  and  other  related
infrastructure,  disrupting  the  activities  of  certain  oil  and  natural  gas  companies  and  resulting  in  unscheduled  shutdowns  of
transportation systems. These activities, their possible escalation and the effects associated with them have had and may have
in the future a negative impact on the Colombian economy or on our business, which may affect our employees or assets.

The FARC has also historically attacked oil and gas infrastructure, bombing pipelines or attacking transport carrying oil

and forcing drivers to spill it in Putumayo and our area of operations. For instance, in 2015, the content of 5 trucks of

28

Table of Contents

Amerisur  were  spilled  close  to  Puerto Asis,  Putumayo.  In  2023,  the  environmental  licensing  processes  in  Putumayo  were
affected as a result of the suspension of public hearings due to lack of adequate security conditions.

Our operations are subject to security and human rights risks.

Our operations can be affected by security related issues that may cause a halt or delay in production and exploration. The
nature  and  magnitude  of  the  risk  may  differ  according  to  the  area  where  operations  are  carried  out.  For  example,  our
operations in Casanare and Meta may be affected by civil disturbances, including blockades. In Putumayo, the primary risk is
the  presence  of  illegal  armed  groups  which  control  drug  production  and  trafficking,  and  this  situation  can  increase  the
perception of security risks, though the exact level of security risk depends on, among other factors, the location of the blocks
and the time of crop production. Consequently, we develop security risk assessments on a yearly basis and constantly monitor
specific  security  related  issues.  Moreover,  since  June  2022,  we  have  strengthened  our  human  rights  and  security  risk
management processes with our security contractors. As of December 2023, all our security contractors underwent training in
security, human rights, and the voluntary principles (as determined by the United Nations Voluntary Principles on Security and
Human Rights initiative).

While we remain committed to strengthening our security processes and protocols, there is no guarantee that incidents of

such nature will not occur in the future.

We  have  also  identified  potential  risks  to  our  operations,  neighboring  communities,  employees,  and  contractors  and
service providers, due to the presence of land mines around several of our blocks in Putumayo. The land mines around this
area were primarily used by FARC to attack public security forces, but other illegal armed groups in the area, including FARC
dissidents, have also been known to place land mines to attack public security forces or use them against their enemies in the
fight for drug trafficking and production.

In addition, our operations may be impacted by our adherence to national laws as well as all international human rights
treaties ratified by the countries where we operate. As part of our commitment to respect human rights and engage in an open,
respectful,  and  transparent  manner  with  all  our  stakeholders,  we  always  strive  to  resolve  all  issues  with  government
authorities, especially following their lead with respect to guaranteeing human rights, through discussion and communication,
which may result in delays to the advancement of our projects.

We  expect  that  a  limited  number  of  financial  institutions  in  the  countries  in  which  we  operate,  as  well  as  some
institutions located in the United States, will hold all or most of our cash.

We expect that a limited number of financial institutions in the countries in which we operate, as well as some institutions
located in the United States, will hold all or most of our cash. Depending on our cash balance in any of our accounts at any
given  point  in  time,  our  balances  may  not  be  covered  by  government-backed  deposit  insurance  programs  in  the  event  of
default or failure of any bank with which we maintain a commercial relationship. The occurrence of any default or failure of
any of the banks in which we have deposits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations  and  cash  flows.  For  example,  with  regards  to  our  accounts  in  the  United  States,  while  the  U.S.  Federal  Deposit
Insurance Corporation provides deposit insurance of US$250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, the amounts that we have in
deposits  in  U.S.  banks  far  exceed  that  insurance  amount.  Therefore,  if  the  U.S.  government  does  not  impose  measures  to
protect  depositors  in  the  event  a  bank  in  which  our  funds  are  held  fails,  we  may  lose  all  or  a  substantial  portion  of  our
deposits.

As of December 31, 2023, we maintained 95% of our cash and cash equivalents in banks ranked within investment grade

category.

29

Table of Contents

Risks relating to our common shares

An active, liquid, and orderly trading market for our common shares may not develop and the price of our stock may be
volatile, which could limit your ability to sell our common shares.

Our common shares began to trade on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on February 7, 2014, and as a result
have a limited trading history. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will maintain an active
trading market on the NYSE, or how liquid that market will be in the future.

The  market  price  of  our  common  shares  may  be  volatile  and  may  be  influenced  by  many  factors,  some  of  which  are

beyond our control, including:

● our operating and financial performance and identified potential drilling locations, including reserve estimates;

● quarterly  variations  in  the  rate  of  growth  of  our  financial  indicators,  such  as  net  income  per  common  share,  net

income and revenues;

● changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of reports by equity research analysts;

● fluctuations in the price of oil or gas;

● speculation in the press or investment community;

● sales of our common shares by us or our shareholders, or the perception that such sales may occur;

● involvement in litigation;

● changes in personnel;

● announcements by the company;

● domestic and international economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance;

● variations in our quarterly operating results;

● volatility in our industry, the industries of our customers and the global securities markets;

● changes in our dividend policy;

● risks relating to our business and industry, including those discussed above;

● strategic actions by us or our competitors;

● actual or expected changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates;

● investor perception of us, the industry in which we operate, the investment opportunity associated with our common

shares and our future performance;

● adverse media reports about us or our directors and officers;

● addition or departure of our executive officers;

30

Table of Contents

● change in coverage of our company by securities analysts;

● trading volume of our common shares;

● future issuances of our common shares or other securities;

● terrorist acts; or

● the release or expiration of transfer restrictions on our outstanding common shares.

Any  decision  to  pay  dividends  in  the  future,  and  the  amount  of  any  distributions,  is  at  the  discretion  of  our  board  of
directors,  and  will  depend  on  many  factors,  such  as  our  results  of  operations,  financial  condition,  cash  requirements,
prospects and other factors.

We  are  committed  to  return  value  to  our  shareholders.  From  2018  to  2023,  we  distributed  US$156.4  million  to
shareholders through share buybacks and US$68.5 million in cash dividends. However, our availability to continue making
distributions to shareholders in the future will depend on many factors, such as our results of operations, financial condition,
cash  requirements,  prospects  and  other  factors.  For  example,  from April  to  November  2020,  we  temporarily  suspended  our
quarterly cash dividends and share buybacks due to the sharp decline in oil prices as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Furthermore,  we  are  subject  to  Bermuda  legal  constraints  that  may  affect  our  ability  to  pay  dividends  on  our  common
shares and make other payments. Under the Companies Act, 1981 (as amended) of Bermuda (the “Companies Act”), we may
not declare or pay a dividend or make a distribution out of contributed surplus, if there are reasonable grounds for believing
that (i) we are, or would after the payment be, unable to pay our liabilities as they become due; or (ii) that the realizable value
of  our  assets  would  thereby  be  less  than  our  liabilities.  We  are  also  subject  to  contractual  restrictions  under  certain  of  our
indebtedness. “Contributed surplus” is defined for purposes of section 54 of the Companies Act to include the proceeds arising
from donated shares, credits resulting from the redemption or conversion of shares at less than the amount set up as nominal
capital and donations of cash and other assets to the company.

We are a holding company and our only material assets are our equity interests in our operating subsidiaries and our
other investments; as a result, our principal source of revenue and cash flow is distributions from our subsidiaries; our
subsidiaries may be limited by law and by contract in making distributions to us.

As a holding company, our only material assets are our cash on hand, the equity interests in our subsidiaries and other
investments. Our principal source of revenue and cash flow is distributions from our subsidiaries. Thus, our ability to service
our  debt,  finance  acquisitions  and  pay  dividends  to  our  stockholders  in  the  future  is  dependent  on  the  ability  of  our
subsidiaries to generate sufficient net income and cash flows to make upstream cash distributions to us. Our subsidiaries are
and will be separate legal entities, and although they may be wholly-owned or controlled by us, they have no obligation to
make  any  funds  available  to  us,  whether  in  the  form  of  loans,  dividends,  distributions  or  otherwise.  The  ability  of  our
subsidiaries  to  distribute  cash  to  us  will  also  be  subject  to,  among  other  things,  restrictions  that  are  contained  in  our
subsidiaries’  financing  and  joint  operations  agreements,  availability  of  sufficient  funds  in  such  subsidiaries  and  applicable
state laws and regulatory restrictions. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries generally will have priority as to the assets of
such subsidiaries over our claims and claims of our creditors and stockholders. To the extent the ability of our subsidiaries to
distribute dividends or other payments to us could be limited in any way, our ability to grow, pursue business opportunities or
make acquisitions that could be beneficial to our businesses, or otherwise fund and conduct our business could be materially
limited.

We may not be able to fully control the operations and the assets of our joint operations and we may not be able to make
major decisions or take timely actions with respect to our joint operations unless our joint operation partners agree. We may, in
the future, enter into joint operations agreements imposing additional restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

31

Table of Contents

Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales may occur,
could cause the market price of our common shares to decline.

We  may  issue  additional  common  shares  or  convertible  securities  in  the  future,  for  example,  to  finance  potential
acquisitions of assets, which we intend to continue to pursue. Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares in the public
market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the market price of our common shares to decline. This could
also  impair  our  ability  to  raise  additional  capital  through  the  sale  of  our  equity  securities.  Under  our  memorandum  of
association,  we  are  authorized  to  issue  up  to  5,171,949,000  common  shares,  of  which  55,327,520  common  shares  were
outstanding as of December 31, 2023. We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common shares or the effect, if
any, that future sales and issuances of shares would have on the market price of our common shares.

Provisions of the Notes due 2027 could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party.

Certain provisions of the Notes due 2027 could make it more difficult or more expensive for a third party to acquire us or
may even prevent a third party from acquiring us. For example, upon the occurrence of a change of control, holders of the
Notes due 2027 will have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase all of their notes at a purchase price equal to
101% of the principal amount thereof plus any accrued and unpaid interest (including any additional amounts, if any) to the
date of purchase. By discouraging an acquisition of us by a third party, these provisions could have the effect of depriving the
holders of our common shares of an opportunity to sell their common shares at a premium over prevailing market prices.

Certain  shareholders  have  substantial  influence  over  us  and  could  limit  your  ability  to  influence  the  outcome  of  key
transactions, including a change of control.

Certain members of our board of directors and our executive officers held 17.9% of our outstanding common shares as of
March 19, 2024, holding the shares either directly or through privately held funds. As a result, these shareholders, if acting
together, would be able to influence matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and the
approval of amalgamations, mergers, or other extraordinary transactions. They may also have interests that differ from yours
and may vote in a way with which you disagree, and which may be adverse to your interests. The concentration of ownership
may have the effect of delaying, preventing, or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our stockholders
of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common shares as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect
the  market  price  of  our  common  shares.  See  “Item  7.  Major  Shareholders  and  Related  Party  Transactions—A.  Major
shareholders” for a more detailed description of our share ownership.

Shareholder activism could cause us to incur significant expenses, hinder execution of our business strategy and impact
our stock price.

Shareholder activism has been increasing generally and in the energy industry specifically. Investors may attempt to effect
changes to our business or governance, such as with respect to climate change or otherwise, by means such as shareholder
proposals,  public  campaigns,  proxy  solicitations  or  other  means.  Such  actions  could  adversely  impact  us  by  distracting  the
Board and employees from core business operations, increasing advisory fees and related costs, interfering with our ability to
successfully execute on strategic transactions and plans and provoking perceived uncertainty about the future direction of the
business.

As  a  foreign  private  issuer,  we  are  subject  to  different  U.S.  securities  laws  and  NYSE  governance  standards  than
domestic  U.S.  issuers.  This  may  afford  less  protection  to  holders  of  our  common  shares,  and  you  may  not  receive
corporate and company information and disclosure that you are accustomed to receiving or in a manner in which you
are accustomed to receiving it.

As  a  foreign  private  issuer,  the  rules  governing  the  information  that  we  disclose  differ  from  those  governing  U.S.
corporations pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Although we intend to report
quarterly  financial  results  and  report  certain  material  events,  we  are  not  required  to  file  quarterly  reports  on  Form  10-Q  or
provide current reports on Form 8-K disclosing significant events within four days of their occurrence and our quarterly or
current reports may contain less information than required under U.S. filings. In addition, we are exempt

32

Table of Contents

from  the  Section  14  proxy  rules,  and  proxy  statements  that  we  distribute  will  not  be  subject  to  review  by  the  SEC.  Our
exemption  from  Section  16  rules  regarding  sales  of  common  shares  by  insiders  means  that  you  will  have  less  data  in  this
regard than shareholders of U.S. companies that are subject to the Exchange Act. As a result, you may not have all the data
that  you  are  accustomed  to  having  when  making  investment  decisions.  For  example,  our  officers,  directors  and  principal
shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act
and the rules thereunder with respect to their purchases and sales of our common shares. The periodic disclosure required of
foreign  private  issuers  is  more  limited  than  that  required  of  domestic  U.S.  issuers  and  there  may  therefore  be  less  publicly
available  information  about  us  than  is  regularly  published  by  or  about  U.S.  public  companies.  See  “Item  10.  Additional
Information—H. Documents on display.”

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from complying with certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE
applicable to a U.S. issuer, including the requirement that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors
as  well  as  the  requirement  that  shareholders  approve  any  equity  issuance  by  us  which  represents  20%  or  more  of  our
outstanding  common  shares. As  the  corporate  governance  standards  applicable  to  us  are  different  than  those  applicable  to
domestic U.S. issuers, you may not have the same protections afforded under U.S. law and the NYSE rules as shareholders of
companies that do not have such exemptions.

There are regulatory limitations on the ownership and transfer of our common shares which could result in the delay or
denial of any transfers you might seek to make.

The permission of the Bermuda Monetary Authority is required, under the provisions of the Exchange Control Act 1972
and related regulations, for all issuances and transfers of shares (which includes our common shares) of Bermuda companies
to  or  from  a  non-resident  of  Bermuda  for  exchange  control  purposes,  other  than  in  cases  where  the  Bermuda  Monetary
Authority has granted a general permission. The Bermuda Monetary Authority, in its notice to the public dated June 1, 2005,
has granted a general permission for the issue and subsequent transfer of any securities of a Bermuda company from and/or to
a non-resident of Bermuda for exchange control purposes for so long as any “Equity Securities” of the company (which would
include  our  common  shares)  are  listed  on  an  “Appointed  Stock  Exchange”  (which  would  include  the  New  York  Stock
Exchange).  In  granting  the  general  permission  the  Bermuda  Monetary Authority  accepts  no  responsibility  for  our  financial
soundness or the correctness of any of the statements made or opinions expressed in this annual report. Any changes in the
permission  granted  by  the  Bermuda  Monetary  Authority  and  related  regulations  could  result  in  a  delay  or  denial  of  any
transfer of shares an investor might seek.

We are a Bermuda company, and it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments against us or against our directors and
executive officers.

We  are  incorporated  as  an  exempted  company  under  the  laws  of  Bermuda  and  our  assets  are  substantially  located  in
Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil. In addition, several of our directors and executive officers reside outside the United States and
all or a substantial portion of the assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or
impossible to effect service of process within the United States upon us, or to recover against us on judgments of U.S. courts,
including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Further, no claim may be
brought in Bermuda against us or our directors and officers in the first instance for violation of U.S. federal securities laws
because  these  laws  have  no  extraterritorial  application  under  Bermuda  law  and  do  not  have  force  of  law  in  Bermuda.
However, a Bermuda court may impose civil liability, including the possibility of monetary damages, on us or our directors
and officers if the facts alleged in a complaint constitute or give rise to a cause of action under Bermuda law.

There  is  no  treaty  in  force  between  the  United  States  and  Bermuda  providing  for  the  reciprocal  recognition  and
enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. However, the courts of Bermuda would recognize any final and
conclusive  monetary  in  personam  judgement  obtained  in  a  U.S.  court  (other  than  a  sum  of  money  payable  in  respect  of
multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) and would give a judgement
based  thereon  provided  that  (i)  the  U.S.  court  that  entered  the  judgment  is  recognized  by  the  Bermuda  court  as  having
jurisdiction over us or our directors and officers, as determined by reference to Bermuda conflict of law rules, (ii) such court
did not contravene the rules of natural justice of Bermuda, such judgment was not obtained by fraud, the enforcement of the
judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of Bermuda, (iii) no new admissible evidence

33

Table of Contents

relevant  to  the  action  is  submitted  prior  to  the  rendering  of  the  judgment  by  the  courts  of  Bermuda,  and  (iv)  there  is  due
compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of Bermuda.

In addition, and irrespective of jurisdictional issues, the Bermuda courts will not enforce a U.S. federal securities law that
is either penal or contrary to Bermuda public policy. An action brought pursuant to a public or penal law, the purpose of which
is the enforcement of a sanction, power or right at the instance of the state in its sovereign capacity, will not be entertained by
a  Bermuda  court.  Certain  remedies  available  under  the  laws  of  U.S.  jurisdictions,  including  certain  remedies  under  U.S.
federal  securities  laws,  would  not  be  available  under  Bermuda  law  or  enforceable  in  a  Bermuda  court,  as  they  would  be
contrary to Bermuda public policy.

The transfer of our common shares may be subject to capital gains taxes pursuant to indirect transfer rules in Colombia.

In August  2020,  the  Colombian  government  enacted  Decree  1103  that  regulates  the  indirect  transfer  tax  established  in
article 90-3 of the Colombian Tax Code. Through this regulation, the transfer of shares and assets of entities located abroad
are  taxed  in  Colombia  when  such  transaction  represents  a  transfer  of  assets  located  in  Colombia  (“Colombian  Assets”).
Although  certain  conditions  and  exemptions  apply,  corporate  reorganizations  shall  monitor  this  new  regulation.  As  we
indirectly own Colombian Assets, the indirect transfer rules would apply to transfers of our common shares provided certain
conditions outside of our control are met. If such conditions were present and as a result the indirect transfer rules were to
apply  to  sales  of  our  common  shares,  such  sales  would  be  subject  to  indirect  transfer  tax  on  the  capital  gain  realized  in
connection with such sales. For a description of the indirect transfer rules and the conditions of their application see “Item 10.
Additional Information—E. Taxation—Colombian tax on transfers of shares.”

Legislation enacted in Bermuda as to Economic Substance may affect our operations.

Pursuant to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (as amended) of Bermuda (the “ES Act”) that came into force on January
1,  2019,  a  registered  entity  other  than  an  entity  which  is  resident  for  tax  purposes  in  certain  jurisdictions  outside  Bermuda
(“non-resident entity”) that carries on as a business any one or more of the “relevant activities” referred to in the ES Act must
comply with economic substance requirements. The ES Act may require in-scope Bermuda entities which are engaged in such
“relevant activities” to be directed and managed in Bermuda, have an adequate of qualified employees in Bermuda, incur an
adequate level of annual expenditure in Bermuda, maintain physical offices and premises in Bermuda or perform core income-
generating activities in Bermuda. The list of “relevant activities” includes carrying on any one or more of: banking, insurance,
fund management, financing, leasing, headquarters, shipping, distribution and service center, intellectual property and holding
entities.

The ES Act could affect how we operate our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results  of  operations.  Although  it  is  presently  anticipated  that  the  ES  Act  will  have  little  material  impact  on  us  or  our
operations, as the legislation is new and remains subject to further clarification and interpretation, it is not currently possible to
ascertain the precise impact of the ES Act on us.

ITEM 4.  INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A.    History and development of the company

General

We  were  incorporated  as  an  exempted  company  pursuant  to  the  laws  of  Bermuda  in  February  2006.  We  maintain  a
registered office in Bermuda at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda. Our principal executive office
is located at Street 94 N° 11-30, 8th floor, Bogotá, Colombia, telephone number +57 1 743 2337.

The SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy, information statements and other information about
issuers,  like  us,  that  file  electronically  with  the  SEC. The  address  of  that  website  is  www.sec.gov. The  Company’s  website
address is www.geo-park.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, the Company’s website is not
part of, and is not incorporated into, this annual report.

34

Table of Contents

Our Company

We are a leading independent oil and natural gas exploration and production (“E&P”) company with operations in Latin
America. We currently operate in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil. We are focused on Latin America because we believe it is
one of the richest and most underexplored hydrocarbon regions globally, with less presence of independent E&P companies
compared to the United States and Canada. In this region, much of the acreage has historically been controlled or owned by
state-owned companies. We believe that these factors create an opportunity for smaller, more agile companies like us to build
a long-term business.

We produced a net average of 36.6 mboepd during the year ended December 31, 2023, of which 90.0%, 2.5%, 2.8% and
4.7%  were,  respectively,  in  Colombia,  Ecuador,  Brazil  and  Chile,  and  of  which  92.9%  was  oil. As  of  December  31,  2023,
according to the ANH, we were ranked as the second largest oil operator in Colombia, where we made the largest new oil field
discovery in the last 20 years.

A  clear  set  of  priorities  and  key  values  have  driven  our  Company  through  a  two-decade  track  record  of  growth,
sustainability  performance  and  strong  value  delivery.  Furthermore,  our  internal  value  system  called  Safety,  Prosperity,
Employees, Environment and Community Development (“SPEED”), which has been part of the Company’s culture since its
inception,  differentiates  us  from  our  peers,  guides  our  decision-making  process  and  is  the  basis  for  our  value-generation
approach to all our stakeholders.

Meeting the energy needs of a growing population while contributing to the energy transition requires us to conduct best-
in-class oil and gas exploration and operation, to manage our assets in the most ethical and sustainable way, and to continue
creating long-term value for our shareholders and all our stakeholders.

Our business model

Our updated business model can be summarized in four simple words and one unifying idea: “We Make Assets Better”.
This  principle  is  underscored  by  our  track  record  of  adapting  to  change,  expanding  our  capabilities,  and  continuously
enhancing our asset portfolio. The model contains three comprises three interlocking elements:

● We deliver more energy by focusing on finding and producing energy as well as in effectively taking it to the market.
This means we have a strong focus on results and to that end, our business model requires the right people, the right
assets, and the right execution.

● We  invest  with  the  goal  of  returning  value  to  all  our  stakeholders.  That  means  we  follow  a  disciplined  capital

allocation targeting the highest value projects, while responsibly taking on and managing risk.

● We create and share prosperity with everyone from our employees to governments and local communities. “Creating
Value and Giving Back” is a central tenet of our Company and bringing prosperity to people while looking after the
environment  will  always  be  one  of  our  top  priorities,  all  while  maintaining  the  highest  standards  of  ethics  and
governance.

At the center of our company and our updated business model is our culture of agility, adaptability, and trust, and we have
a horizontal structure where all our employees have autonomy, ownership, and a key role to play. Our culture is our binding
force, and we need to protect and nurture it if we are to excel at the three interlocking elements described above.

History

We  were  founded  in  2002.  We  are  a  leading  independent  oil  and  natural  gas  exploration  and  production  (“E&P”),
company with operations in Latin America. During 2023, we had operations in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile, and as of
January 2024, we have divested the entirety of our business in Chile as further described below.

Our History can be summarized by our growth in each country and our performance in the capital markets:

35

Table of Contents

Colombia

In the first quarter of 2012, we entered into Colombia by acquiring three privately held E&P companies, that were later
merged into GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. These acquisitions provided us with an attractive platform of reserves and resources in
Colombia, including a 45% operated working interest in the Llanos 34 Block.

During 2019, jointly with Ecopetrol/Hocol, we acquired five low-cost, low-risk and high-potential exploration blocks in
the  Llanos  Basin,  surrounding  the  Llanos  34  Block,  and  we  also  executed  an  agreement  to  assume  a  50%  non-operated
working interest in the Llanos 94 Block.

In January 2020, we acquired the entire share capital of Amerisur, which owned thirteen production, development, and
exploration  blocks  in  Colombia,  distributed  as  follows:  twelve  operated  blocks  in  the  Putumayo  basin  (including  the
producing Platanillo Block) and one non-operated block in the Llanos basin (the producing CPO-5 Block), and a cross-border
oil pipeline from Colombia to Ecuador.

In 2023, we drilled and put into production five oil exploration wells in the Llanos 87 and Llanos 123 Blocks.

Ecuador

On May 22, 2019, we signed participation contracts for the Espejo (GeoPark operated, 50% working interest) and Perico
(GeoPark non-operated, 50% working interest) Blocks in Ecuador. In 2022, we recorded our first oil sales in Ecuador due to
the successful exploration campaign in the Perico Block, which continued during 2023, and we also acquired 60 sq km of 3D
seismic and drilled our first exploration well in the Espejo Block.

Brazil

Since  2013,  we  have  participated  in  several  Bid  Rounds  promoted  by  the  Brazilian ANP.  In  2014,  we  acquired  a  10%
non-operated working interest in the BCAM-40 Concession, which included an interest in the Manati Gas Field operated by
Petrobras.

Chile

In 2006, after demonstrating our technical expertise and committing to an exploration and development plan, we obtained
a 100% operating working interest in the Fell Block from the Republic of Chile. Then, in 2011, ENAP awarded us operating
working  interests  in  each  of  the  Isla  Norte,  Flamenco  and  Campanario  Blocks.  In  December  2023,  we  entered  into  an
agreement  to  sell  our  Chilean  subsidiaries  which  comprised  the  entirety  of  our  business  in  the  country.  The  divestment
transaction  closed  in  January  2024  and,  as  part  of  the  transaction,  we  have  retained  certain  rights  over  unconventional
activities that would be carried out in the Fell Block over the current operating contract in the future.

Other Latin American countries

During  our  history  as  operators,  we  have  also  had  operations  in Argentina  and  Peru,  and  we  have  participated  in  bid

rounds in Mexico. As of the date of this annual report, we do not have operations in these countries.

Funding

In February 2014, we commenced trading on the NYSE and raised US$98 million (before underwriting commissions and
expenses),  including  the  over-allotment  option  granted  to  and  exercised  by  the  underwriters,  through  the  issuance  of
13,999,700 common shares.

Between 2005 and 2023, we raised approximately US$200 million in equity offerings at the holding company level and
nearly  US$1.5  billion  through  debt  arrangements  with  multilateral  agencies  such  as  the  IFC,  gas  prepayment  facilities,
international  bond  issuances  and  bank  financings,  described  further  below,  which  have  been  used  to  fund  our  capital
expenditures program and acquisitions and to increase our liquidity.

36

Table of Contents

In January 2020, we issued US$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.5% senior notes due 2027 (the “Notes due
2027”).  In  April  2021,  we  reopened  our  Notes  due  2027,  issuing  an  additional  US$150.0  million  principal  amount.  The
reopening was priced above par at 101.875%, representing a yield to maturity of 5.117%. The Notes due 2027 are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by GeoPark Colombia, S.L.U. Final maturity will be January 17, 2027.

On  June  17,  2022,  we  received  requisite  consents  from  holders  of  the  Notes  due  2027  for  certain  amendments  to  the
indenture governing the Notes due 2027. The amendments addressed the impact of adverse market conditions and related drop
in the price of crude oil during 2020 on our results, which in turn negatively impacted the restricted payments builder basket,
and increased and reset the general restricted payments basket in the indenture to provide us additional restricted payments
capacity, giving us additional financial flexibility. Consequently, on June 27, 2022, we paid a consent fee equal to $10.00 per
$1,000 to holders of the Notes due 2027 that delivered their consents for the abovementioned amendments to the indenture
governing the Notes due 2027.

From April 2021 to September 2022, we repurchased and cancelled our US$425.0 million aggregate principal amount of
6.5%  senior  secured  notes  due  2024  (the  “Notes  due  2024”).  In April  2021,  we  executed  a  tender  to  purchase  US$255.0
million of the Notes due 2024, funded with a combination of cash in hand and the abovementioned reopening of the Notes due
2027.  From  March  to  September  2022,  we  repurchased  and  cancelled  the  remaining  amount  of  the  Notes  due  2024  for  a
nominal amount of US$ 170.0 million.

Following the abovementioned transactions, we reduced our total indebtedness nominal amount by US$275.0 million by

using the cash generated from our operations and improved our financial profile by extending our debt maturities.

On  August  3,  2023,  we  signed  a  senior  unsecured  credit  agreement  with  Banco  BTG  Pactual  S.A.  and  Banco
Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior S.A. which provides us with access to up to US$80 million, with an availability period
until November 3, 2024, and final maturity on August 3, 2025. As of the date of this annual report, we have not withdrawn any
amount under this credit facility.

B.    Business Overview

We have grown our business through drilling, developing and producing oil and gas, winning new licenses and acquiring
strategic  assets  and  businesses.  We  continually  evaluate  the  potential  acquisition  of  strategic  assets  that  will  allow  us  to
continue  growing  our  business  in  line  with  our  recent  operating  and  financial  successes.  Since  our  inception,  we  have
supported  our  growth  through  our  prospect  development  efforts,  drilling  program,  long-term  strategic  partnerships  and
alliances with key industry participants, accessing debt and equity capital markets, developing and retaining a technical team
with vast experience and creating a successful track record of finding and producing oil and gas in Latin America. A key factor
behind  our  success  ratio  is  our  experienced  team  of  geologists,  geophysicists  and  engineers,  including  professionals  with
specialized expertise in the geology of Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile and Argentina.

37

Table of Contents

The  following  map  shows  the  countries  in  which  we  have  blocks  with  working  and/or  economic  interests  as  of

December 31, 2023. For information on our working interests in each of these blocks, see “—Our assets” below.

(1)

(2)

In process of relinquishment. See “—Our operations—Operations in Colombia” and “—Our operations—Operations in
Argentina.”
In  process  of  transferring  our  working  interest  in  the  block  to  the  partner.  See  “—Our  operations—Operations  in
Colombia” and “—Our operations—Operations in Argentina.”

(3) Divested in January 2024. See “—Our operations—Operations in Chile.”

38

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our net proved reserves and other data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023.

For the year ended December 31, 2023

Country
Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile(1)
Other
Total

Oil
(mmbbl)
 59.3
 2.3
 0.0
 1.1
 —
 62.8

Gas
(bcf)

 1.1
 —
 8.9
 10.8
 —
 20.8

Oil 
equivalent 
(mmboe)
 59.5
 2.3
 1.5
 2.9
 —
 66.2

 100.0 %
 1.9 %
 37.9 %

% Oil
 99.7 %  702,401
 19,097
 14,019
 15,644
 5,464
 94.8 %  756,625

    Revenues 

(in thousands  % of total 
revenues

of US$)

(1) Divested in January 2024. See “—Our operations—Operations in Chile.”

The following table sets forth our average net production during the last five years, as measured by boepd.

Average net production (mboepd)
% oil

2023

 36.6
93%

For the year ended December 31, 
2021

2020

2022

 38.6
91%

 37.6
86%

 40.2
87%

 92.8 %
 2.5 %
 1.9 %
 2.1 %
 0.7 %
 100.0 %

2019

 40.0
86%

The  following  table  sets  forth  our  production  of  oil  and  natural  gas  in  the  blocks  in  which  we  have  a  working  and/or

economic interest as of December 31, 2023.

Oil production

Total crude oil production (bopd)

Natural gas production

Total natural gas production (mcf/day)

Oil and natural gas production

    Colombia     Ecuador    

Average daily production
For the year ended December 31, 2023
    Chile(1)
Brazil

Total

 32,795

 926

 16

 221

 33,958

 573

 —

 6,065

 8,993

 15,631

Total oil and natural gas production (mboepd)

 32,890

 926

 1,027

 1,720

 36,563

(1) Divested in January 2024. See “—Our operations—Operations in Chile.”

Our assets

We have a portfolio of assets that includes working and/or economic interests in 34 hydrocarbon blocks, 33 of which are
onshore  blocks,  including  10  in  production  as  of  December  31,  2023,  and  provides  the  ability  to  quickly  optimize  capital
allocation as market conditions change. Our assets give us access to more than 4.7 million gross exploratory and productive
acres.

According to the D&M Reserves Report, as of December 31, 2023, the blocks in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile in
which  we  have  a  working  interest  had  66.2  mmboe  of  net  proved  reserves,  with  89.9%,  3.5%,  2.3%  and  4.4%  of  such  net
proved reserves located in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile, respectively.

We produced a net average of 36.6 mboepd during the year ended December 31, 2023, of which 90.0%, 2.5%, 2.8% and

4.7%, were in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile, respectively, and of which 92.9% was oil.

Our strengths

We believe that we benefit from the following competitive strengths:

39

 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

High quality and diversified asset base built through a successful track record of organic growth and acquisitions

Our  assets  include  a  diverse  portfolio  of  oil  and  natural  gas-producing  reserves,  operating  infrastructure,  operating
licenses and valuable geological surveys in Latin America. Throughout our history, we have delivered continuous growth in
our  production,  and  our  management  team  has  been  able  to  identify  under-exploited  assets  and  turn  them  into  valuable,
productive assets, and to allocate resources effectively based on prevailing conditions. For further information on our organic
growth  and  acquisitions  in  each  country,  see  “—A.  History  and  Development  of  the  Company—History”  and  “—Our
operations.”

Significant drilling inventory and resource potential from existing asset base

Our  portfolio  includes  large  land  holdings  in  high-potential  hydrocarbon  basins  and  blocks  with  multiple  drilling  leads
and  prospects  in  different  geological  formations,  which  provide  several  attractive  opportunities  with  varying  levels  of  risk.
Our drilling inventory and our development plans target locations that provide attractive economics and support a predictable
production profile, as demonstrated by our expansions in Colombia.

Our  geoscience  team  continues  to  identify  new  potential  accumulations  and  expand  our  inventory  of  prospects  and

drilling opportunities.

Risk-balanced asset portfolio

We intend to continue to focus on maintaining a risk-balanced portfolio of assets, combining cash flow-generating assets
with upside potential opportunities, and on increasing production and reserves through finding, developing and producing oil
and gas reserves in the countries in which we operate. In general, when we enter a new country we look for a mix of three
elements: (i) producing fields, or existing discoveries with near-term possibility of production, to generate cash flows; (ii) an
inventory of adjacent low-risk prospects that can offer medium-term upside for steady growth; and (iii) a periphery of higher-
risk projects which have a potential to generate significant upside in the long run.

For  example,  in  Colombia,  we  acquired Amerisur  in  2020  to  pursue  a  risk-balanced  approach:  one  block  had  mainly
proven production and reserves to provide us with a steady cash flow base, and the remaining blocks had highly prospective
exploration licenses.

We  believe  this  approach  will  allow  us  to  sustain  continuous  and  profitable  growth  and  also  participate  in  higher  risk

growth opportunities with upside potential. See “—Our operations.”

Platform and Funding

We are focused on continued growth utilizing a disciplined capital structure and a conservative financial philosophy. Due
to the volatile nature of commodity prices, expenditure discipline and a focus on disciplined capital structure are critical to our
business. Our multi-country platform and asset portfolio is managed through our capital allocation methodology, which also
allows  us  to  quickly  adapt  and  grow.  Under  this  methodology,  we  rank  all  of  the  projects  based  on  economic,  technical,
environmental, social and corporate governance and strategic criteria, for the purpose of comparing projects. This also creates
opportunities  for  improvements  in  the  projects  that  can,  in  turn,  improve  their  ranking.  Finally,  once  the  production  and
reserve growth targets are defined, we agree on the amount of capital to be invested and allocates that capital to the highest
value-adding projects. As an example, for the 2024 capital allocation process, over 307 projects were selected which comprise
our 2024 work program, under the base capital program. Additionally, given the inherent oil price volatility, we design our
work programs to be flexible, which means that they can be increased or decreased depending on the oil price scenario.

We have historically benefited from access to debt and equity capital markets and cash flows from operations, as well as
other  funding  sources,  which  have  provided  us  with  funds  to  finance  our  organic  growth  and  the  pursuit  of  potential  new
opportunities. For further information on our funding through debt and equity capital markets, see “Item 4. Information on the
Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Funding.”

40

Table of Contents

We generated US$300.9 million and US$467.5 million in cash from operations in the years ended December 31, 2023 and
2022, respectively, and had US$133.0 million and US$128.8 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2023
and 2022, respectively.

As of December 31, 2023, we had US$501.0 million of total outstanding indebtedness which is scheduled to mature in

January 2027.

Strong cash flow

We benefit from a strong cash flow from operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash flows from
operating activities were US$300.9 million. Our cash flows from operating activities plays a significant role in funding our
capital expenditures and shareholders return.

Maintain financial strength

We seek to maintain a prudent and sustainable capital structure and a strong financial position to allow us to maximize the
development of our assets and capitalize on business opportunities as they arise. We intend to remain financially disciplined
by  limiting  substantially  all  our  debt  incurrence  to  identified  projects  with  repayment  sources.  We  expect  to  continue
benefiting from diverse funding sources such as our partners and customers in addition to the international capital markets.

Our cash flow generation is complemented by our financial hedging program. Since October 2016, we have entered into
derivative financial instruments to partially manage our exposure to oil price risk. The purpose of our hedging strategy is to
establish  minimum  oil  prices  to  secure  a  stable  cash  flow  and  the  execution  of  our  work  program.  For  more  information
regarding our financial hedging program please see Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We believe that by maintaining a disciplined capital structure and a conservative financial philosophy, including limiting
our  debt  incurrence  to  specified  projects  with  repayment  sources  and  our  use  of  financial  hedges,  we  are  positioned  to
maintain sufficient liquidity and remain flexible in volatile commodity price environments. Our financial flexibility also gives
us the ability to pursue new opportunities through future potential acquisitions.

Pursue strategic acquisitions in Latin America

We  have  historically  benefited  from,  and  intend  to  continue  to  grow  through,  strategic  acquisitions  in  Latin America.
These  acquisitions  have  provided  us  with  additional  attractive  platforms  in  the  region.  Our  Colombian  acquisitions,  for
example,  highlight  our  ability  to  identify  and  execute  on  attractive  growth  opportunities,  as  we  have  grown  to  become  the
second largest operator in Colombia. We acquired our interest in the Llanos 34 Block in the first quarter of 2012 for US$30
million and have achieved 1P reserve PV-10 of US$823 million as of December 31, 2023. Our enhanced regional portfolio,
including investment-grade countries and strong partnerships, position us as a regional consolidator. We intend to continue to
grow  through  strategic  acquisitions  in  other  countries  in  Latin  America,  which  we  may  consider  from  time  to  time.  Our
acquisition strategy is aimed at maintaining a balanced portfolio of lower-risk cash flow-generating properties and assets that
have upside potential, keeping a balanced mix of oil and gas-producing assets (though we expect to remain weighted towards
oil) and focusing on both assets and corporate targets.

In  January  2020,  we  acquired  the  entire  share  capital  of Amerisur,  which  owned  thirteen  production,  development  and
exploration  blocks  in  Colombia  (twelve  operated  blocks  in  the  Putumayo  Basin  and  one  non-operated  block  in  the  Llanos
Basin) and a cross-border oil pipeline from Colombia to Ecuador named Oleoducto Binacional Amerisur (“OBA”).

Maintain a high degree of operatorship to control production costs

As  of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  we  are  and  intend  to  continue  to  be  the  operator  of  a  majority  of  the  blocks  and
concessions in which we have working interests. Operating the majority of our blocks and concessions gives us the flexibility
to allocate our capital and resources opportunistically and efficiently within a diversified asset portfolio. We

41

Table of Contents

believe that this strategy has allowed, and will continue to allow us, to leverage our unique culture, focused on excellence, and
our talented technical, operating and management teams.

Long-term strategic partnerships and strong strategic relationships provide us with additional funding flexibility to
pursue further acquisitions

We benefit from a number of strong partnerships and relationships. In Colombia, we believe we have developed a strong
relationship with Ecopetrol, the Colombian state-owned oil and gas company. In Brazil, we believe we will continue to derive
benefits from the long-term relationship with Petrobras.

Maintain our commitment to environmental, safety, human rights and social responsibility

An important component of our business strategy is our corporate approach and commitment to our safety, environmental
and  social  responsibilities,  which  is  embodied  in  decisions  that  are  framed  by  our  safety,  environmental  and  social
responsibility  internal  policies  and  aligned  with  international  standards.  We  see  this  as  a  fundamental  element  in  securing
business  initiatives  for  long-term  growth.  Our  commitment  to  sustainable  development  has  allowed  us  to  generate  positive
impacts  in  the  territories  in  which  we  operate,  with  important  contributions  to  the  protection  of  biodiversity  and  the
environment, as well as to the wellbeing and reduction of multidimensional poverty in neighboring communities. We maintain
a  social  license  to  operate,  based  on  the  construction  and  maintenance  of  mutually  beneficial  relationships  with  local
communities, the return of value as allies for their social and economic development, the respect for their human rights and
the care and preservation of the environment. Detailed information can be found in our last SPEED Report which is available
at the Company’s website.

Our  internal  value  system  is  called  Safety,  Prosperity,  Employees,  Environment  and  Community  Development
(“SPEED”).  Our  SPEED  program  was  developed  in  accordance  with  several  international  quality  standards,  including  ISO
14001  (for  environmental  management  issues),  ISO  45001  (for  occupational  health  and  safety  management  issues),  ISO
26000  (for  social  responsibility  and  workers’  rights  issues),  IFC  guidelines  for  social  and  environmental  performance,  and
guidelines from associations including IOGP, IPIECA, IADC and ARPEL. See “—Health, safety and environmental matters.”

Our Environmental Management System (“EMS”) has been certified under the ISO 14001:2015 standard since 2017. The
scope  of  this  certification  includes  all  our  activities,  processes  and  products  related  to  the  exploration  and  exploitation  of
hydrocarbons in Colombia, covering 97% of our operations.

In 2023, we obtained the latest re-certification of the ISO 14001:2015, which is valid until August 2026.

Since 2017, GeoPark has certified the greenhouse gas inventory of its operations in Scopes 1 and 2 in Colombia, through
the  NTC-ISO  14064-1  standard  of  the  Colombian  Institute  of  Technical  Standards  and  Certification  (ICONTEC).  GeoPark
was the second private company to get this certification in Colombia, allowing us to draw a roadmap to reduce our emissions
of  greenhouse  gases  and  help  the  countries  where  we  operate  meet  their  commitments  under  the  Paris Agreement.  During
2023, we continued to incorporate clean energy sources in our operations, and implemented energy efficiency measures, while
also managing our methane emissions in accordance with our decarbonization targets.

In January 2023, GeoPark was included for a second year in a row in the Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index, including
companies with best-in-class gender-related practices and policies. Additionally, we were recognized by the Portfolio Awards
in the Corporate Social Responsibility category for our commitment and positive impact on neighboring communities.

During  2023,  we  carried  out  our  first  ever  double  materiality  assessment  with  the  help  of  an  expert  consultant  and
following GRI guidelines. Our new materiality matrix includes the following topics: climate action; ethics and transparency;
responsible management of water and biodiversity; health and safety in the workplace; community engagement; human talent
management,  equality,  inclusion  and  diversity;  energetic  transformation;  air  quality  management;  and  supply  chain
management.

42

Table of Contents

In 2023, we delivered our SPEED/sustainability report and Environment, Social and Governance metrics according to the
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards as well as the sustainability reporting guide of the Global Oil and Gas Association
for  Advancing  Environmental  and  Social  Performance  (IPIECA,  2020),  selected  metrics  of  the  Sustainability  Accounting
Standards  Board  (SASB,  2018)  and  in  alignment  with  Spain’s  Law  11  of  2018  on  non-financial  information  disclosures.
Furthermore,  our  2023  SPEED/ESG+  Report  will  include  the  guidelines  of  the  Task  Force  on  Climate  Related  Financial
Disclosures (TCFD) for the first time.

In  2023,  we  submitted  the  Carbon  Disclosure  Project’s  (CDP)  Climate  Change  questionnaire  for  the  second  time  and
obtained a B rating, an improvement from the C obtained in the year prior. We also submitted the CDP water questionnaire for
the first time and obtained a C giving us a baseline against to benchmark future performance.

We were recognized with the 2023 Portfolio Award in the Corporate Social Responsibility category. The Portfolio Awards

are given annually by the “El Tiempo” editorial house to companies with outstanding sustainability performance.

In  2022,  the  Colombian  national  government,  through  its  department  for  social  prosperity,  once  again  recognized  our
“Sustainable Housing” program among the 24 most important public, private and international cooperation programs in terms
of overcoming poverty in Colombia. The homes of more than 2,000 families that are neighbors to our areas of operation in the
country have been benefitted by this program, which we have been carrying out since 2013 in alliance with the ‘Minuto de
Dios’ corporation.

In  2022,  we  participated  along  with  the  150  largest  companies  in  Colombia,  obtaining  special  recognition  for  best
performance  in  the  “Focusing”  component  associated  with  the  implementation  of  social  and  environmental  investment
initiatives in the most vulnerable areas and populations of the country.

Since 2021, we have participated in the private social investment index, an independent syndicated study conducted by
Jaime Arteaga y Asociados (JA&A), which aims to measure the effort of the private sector to improve the living conditions of
communities and/or population groups based on their voluntary decision to invest in social and environmental projects.

In 2019, we joined the Equipares gender equality certification program, an initiative of the Colombian government and
the  United  Nations  Development  Program  (UNDP)  focused  on  achieving  parity  in  the  workplace.  In  2020,  we  created  a
standing company-wide committee to implement action plans that encourage and sustain the values of equity, inclusion and
diversity.  In  2020,  we  also  reported  for  the  first  time  our  gender  equality  metrics  using  the  Bloomberg  Gender  Reporting
Framework.  In  2021,  we  achieved  the  Equipares  Silver  Seal,  after  the  Colombian  Institute  of  Technical  Standards  and
Certification (ICONTEC) gave a 91/100 rating to our SGIG (Gender Equality Management System).

In 2018, the Colombian government granted GeoPark the “Best Social Practices in the Energy Industry” award for our
good  neighbor  social  conflict  prevention  program.  GeoPark’s  model  for  community  engagement  was  chosen  out  of  107
different  initiatives  by  a  panel  composed  of  representatives  from  the  Ministry  of  Mines  and  Energy,  the  National
Hydrocarbons  Agency  and  the  United  Nations  Development  Program.  In  2019,  we  won  the  “Best  Social  Practices  in  the
Energy  Industry”  award  for  the  second  year  in  a  row,  along  with  the  “Best  Socio-Laboral  Practices”  award  for  our  “Juntos
Sumamos”  program.  In  2021,  we  again  won  the  “Best  Social  Practices  in  the  Energy  Industry”  award  for  our  “Sustainable
Housing”  program,  which  improves  the  living  conditions  and  well-being  of  our  neighbors  in  Casanare  and  Putumayo. The
jury  was  composed  of  public  sector  members  and  representatives  from  academic  and  multilateral  organizations. The  award
was determined based on the impact of each initiative, its sustainability efforts, innovation, and relation to the 2030 agenda.

Additionally, we recently improved our performance in the MSCI ESG Ratings Assessment from A to AA, providing our

stakeholders with further evidence of our commitment to sustainability and value generation across the board.

Our approach on human rights seeks to conduct business in a way that is consistent with the UN Guiding Principles on
Business  and  Human  Rights  (the  “UN  Guiding  Principles”),  the  ten  UN  Global  Compact  Principles  and  the  Voluntary
Principles on Security and Human Rights. Our commitment to these standards is reflected in our SPEED program, as well as
in  all  our  policies  and  procedures.  Human  Rights  aspects  are  integrated  into  internal  management  processes,  tools,
communications, contracts, and trainings.

43

Table of Contents

As part of our commitment to sustainable development and the sustainability development goals, we joined the United

Nations Global Compact in 2023.

We have a grievance mechanism in place for all our blocks and operations in Colombia, which is aligned with the UN
Guiding  Principles  (UNGP)  on  Business  and  Human  Rights,  meaning  it  is  accessible,  legitimate,  aligned  with  judicial  and
non-judicial  grievance  mechanisms,  based  on  dialogue  and  participation,  and  predictable,  to  name  a  few  of  the  eleven
principles  established  in  the  UNGP.  Having  open,  accessible,  transparent,  and  respectful  communication  with  all  our
stakeholders  is  crucial  to  respecting  their  human  rights  to  information  and  participation.  Our  grievance  mechanism,
“Cuéntame” (“Tell me” in English), is one of our most important tools to engage with communities, contractors and service
providers, and our employees on the ground, and this is especially true because it is easily accessible to all through all our
social  engagement  employees,  email,  several  mobile  and Whatsapp  numbers,  and  an  office  in  the  biggest  city  close  to  our
operations. Furthermore, if any stakeholder approaches our doors, they will be informed about the mechanism and will be able
to present a grievance, complaint or question immediately. To further align and strengthen our grievance mechanism with the
highest standards on human rights, in 2022, we worked with a reputable NGO in Colombia called “Fundación Ideas para la
Paz”  to  assess  “Cuéntame”  against  the  UNGP,  the  OECD  Guidance,  the  International  Financial  Corporation  and  the World
Bank standards. We were ranked as having best practices (meaning a complete level of implementation) in one of the UNGP,
as  having  high  level  of  progress  and  implementation  in  eight  of  the  UNGP,  and  as  having  progress  with  an  opportunity  to
improve  in  two  of  the  UNGP. As  part  of  the  results,  we  have  implemented  a  plan  to  close  some  of  the  gaps  identified,  for
example  by  increasing  the  number  of  forums  and  meetings  to  communicate  and  raise  awareness  of  the  existence  of  the
grievance  mechanism,  as  well  as  providing  stakeholders  the  opportunity  to  give  feedback  on  the  mechanism’s  operation,
effectiveness, responses, among others. To be even closer to our neighbors in Colombia, we opened a “Cuentame” office in
Puerto  Asis  (Putumayo)  in  2021  and  one  in  Tauramena  (Casanare)  in  2023.  The  offices  are  open  to  the  community,  and
through  it  GeoPark  seeks  to  continue  strengthening  dialogue  with  all  its  stakeholders  and  encourage  active  community
participation so that all neighbors can share proposals and ideas to promote harmonious coexistence and good neighborliness.

For  further  information  related  to  health,  safety  and  environmental  matters,  please  see  “—Health,  safety  and

environmental matters.”

Transparency, ethics and anti-corruption

Transparency  is  a  cornerstone  of  good  governance  and  it  is  embodied  in  our  corporate  values.  Transparency  allows
business to prosper in a predictable and competitive environment. We believe that doing business in an ethical and transparent
manner is a prerequisite for sustainable business. We have zero-tolerance policy towards all forms of corruption. This policy is
embedded across our Company through our corporate values, our Code of Conduct (Our Code), and our Compliance Program.
They  prohibit  all  forms  of  corruption  and  bribery  and  reflects  our  values  and  our  commitment  to  high  ethical  standards  in
business activities; they apply to all our employees, board members and third parties.

Our Compliance Program aims to support and promote an ethics culture, as well as create and establish commitments and
procedures  that  ensure  internal  and  external  regulatory  compliance  and  anti-corruption  matters.  Program  execution  and
implementation  is  the  responsibility  of  our  Compliance  Department,  which  is  directed  by  the  Corporate  Governance  and
Compliance Manager, who reports directly to the Audit Committee. Additionally, the Board's Audit Committee monitors the
effectiveness  of  the  compliance  program,  controls,  and  risk  mitigation  measures,  and  oversees  plans  to  strengthen  ethical
culture. The program is based on three pillars:

●

Prevention:  ethics-based  culture,  including  tone  from  the  top  matters,  training  and  awareness  and  ethic  line
management.

● Detection:  risk  assessment  and  advisory,  including  policies  and  procedures  assurance,  laws  and  regulations

compliance and risk assessment management.

● Monitoring: monitor and oversight, including on-going monitoring, due diligence third parties and regulations

oversight.

44

Table of Contents

Since  2018,  we  have  actively  participated  in  the  Colombian  Extractive  Industries  Transparency  Initiative  (EITI)  and
contributed  data  to  the  country’s  annual  EITI  report.  During  2023,  GeoPark  continued  its  adherence  to  the  Business  Ethics
Leadership Alliance (BELA) as part of its efforts to continue strengthening its ethical culture. BELA is a platform of more
than 375 companies in 60 industries recognized worldwide for their ethics and compliance leadership.

Highly committed founding shareholder and technical and management teams with proven industry expertise and

technically-driven culture

Management  and  operating  teams  have  significant  experience  in  the  oil  and  gas  industry  and  a  proven  technical  and
commercial  performance  record  in  onshore  fields,  as  well  as  complex  projects  in  Latin  America  and  around  the  world,
including  expertise  in  identifying  acquisition  and  expansion  opportunities.  Moreover,  we  differentiate  ourselves  from  other
E&P  companies  through  our  technically-driven  culture,  which  fosters  innovation,  creativity  and  timely  execution.  Our
geoscientists,  geophysicists  and  engineers  are  pivotal  to  the  success  of  our  business  strategy,  and  we  have  created  an
environment and supplied the resources that enable our technical team to focus its knowledge, skills and experience on finding
and developing oil and gas fields.

In  addition,  we  strive  to  provide  a  safe  and  motivating  workplace  for  employees  in  order  to  attract,  protect,  retain  and

train a quality team in the competitive marketplace for capable energy professionals.

One  of  our  founding  shareholders  and  current Vice  Chair  of  the  Board,  Mr.  James  F.  Park,  has  been  involved  in  E&P
projects  in  Latin  America  since  1978.  He  has  been  closely  involved  in  grass-roots  exploration  activities,  drilling  and
production operations, surface and pipeline construction, legal and regulatory issues, crude oil marketing and transportation
and capital raising for the industry. As of March 19, 2024, Mr. Park held 15.9% of our outstanding common shares.

Our  management  and  operating  team  have  an  average  experience  in  the  energy  industry  of  more  than  25  years  in
companies such as Chevron, Ecopetrol, ENAP, Petrobras, Pluspetrol, San Jorge, Total and YPF, among others. Throughout our
history, our management and operating team has had success in unlocking unexploited value from previously underdeveloped
assets.

In addition, as of March 19, 2024, our executive directors and executive officers (excluding Mr. James F. Park) owned
1.2% of our outstanding common shares, aligning their interests with those of our shareholders and helping retain the talent
we  need  to  continue  to  support  our  business  strategy.  See  “Item  6.  Directors,  Senior  Management  and  Employees—
B. Compensation.” One of our founding shareholders is also involved in our daily operations and strategy.

Technically-driven culture and capitalization of local knowledge

We intend to continue to pursue strategies that maximize value. For this purpose, we intend to continue expanding our
technical teams and to foster a culture that rewards talent according to results. For example, we have been able to maintain the
technical teams we inherited through our Colombian and Brazilian acquisitions. We believe local technical and professional
knowledge is key to operational and long-term success and intend to continue to secure local talent as we grow our business in
different locations.

Innovation

We embrace innovation as a foundation for cultivating a dynamic work culture that consistently seeks improvements in
our operational processes. The objective is to streamline costs, increase production, minimize risks, and optimize information
management.  At  GeoPark,  we  firmly  believe  that  creating  an  innovative  culture  is  necessary  for  ensuring  our  enduring
success.

Through  a  proactive  approach  to  innovation,  our  goal  is  to  create  positive  impacts  on  productivity,  enable  effective
decision-making based on reliable and timely information, fortify teamwork, foster leadership skills, and establish a culture
that champions creativity and innovation.

45

Table of Contents

The  innovation  program  continues  to  generate  not  only  tangible  benefits  across  the  company  and  environmental
sustainability,  but  strengthens  the  development  of  new  skills  within  the  organization.  Innovation  not  only  contributes  to
improving internal conditions but also plays a vital role in positively influencing the communities where we operate.

In  2023,  we  diligently  monitored  a  range  of  innovation  projects  identified  during  workshops,  effectively  fostering  a
culture  of  innovation  across  various  areas.  The  integration  of  digital  capabilities,  including Artificial  Intelligence,  Machine
Learning, Internet of Things, Big Data, Automation, and Cloud Computing, marked a significant achievement. Throughout the
year, collaborative innovation initiatives with leading partners such as Microsoft, Google, Halliburton, Cisco, SAP, Indra and
many others were executed, showcasing our commitment to cutting-edge advancements.

The ongoing innovation journey is exemplified by several projects, some still in progress:

● Horizontal  drilling:  implementing  a  pilot  and  executing  horizontal  drilling  campaign,  improving  the  recovery

factor in our reserves of hydrocarbons in the Llanos 34 Block.

● Carbon  Quantum  Dot  (CQD):  simultaneous  development  and  injection  of  Nanotracers  based  on  CQD  for
waterflooding in Llanos 34 Block, allowing us to not only prove the technology but also obtain tax benefits.

● Process  Integration:  implementing  systems  aimed  at  achieving  high  reliability  level  of  production  tests  data
utilizing Multiphase Meter equipment while expediting their management. Additionally, optimizing production
data  to  minimize  the  time  required  for  information  gathering,  analysis,  and  identification  of  opportunities  to
increase production in the wells.

● Nanotechnology PoC: applying nanotechnology in fluids to induce specific chemical and physical reactions on a

nanometric scale to improve oil production. The concept is expected to be proven in 2024.

● Centrifuge for tank bottoms: implement a centrifuge decanter to reduce waste-water in +50%, reducing OPEX

and CO2 emissions in our operation in the Llanos 34 Block. It is expected to be implemented in 2024.

● Electrocoagulation: improving waste-water treatment for injection or road dampening in minor field.

● Facilities  optimization:  addressing  energy  consumers  and  enhancing  the  energy  efficiency  of  water  injection

pumps.

● Video analytics and pipeline failure detection: deploying a real-time monitoring system for facilities powered by

solar energy and artificial intelligence to detect failures and non-ethical intrusions.

● Cloud journey: approximately 100% of the infrastructure is in the cloud with intercloud redundancies and strong

cybersecurity capabilities.

Other innovation projects were executed across all organizational areas, encompassing people, processes, and technology.
We  remain  vigilant  in  our  commitment  to  identify  innovation  opportunities  that  enhance  enterprise  productivity,  employee
collaboration, communication, and decision-making through technology. Ongoing efforts aim to further embed this innovation
culture  throughout  the  company  with  plans  for  new  workshops  geared  towards  capturing  and  developing  ideas  and
strengthening  skills  in  our  team  while  focusing  on:  production,  geosciences,  circular  economy  and  energy  transition,  and
innovation management.

2024 Strategy and Outlook

Oil  prices  have  been  volatile  over  the  past  years.  In  preparation  for  continued  volatility,  we  have  developed  multiple

scenarios for our 2024 capital expenditures program.

46

Table of Contents

Our preliminary base capital program for 2024 considered a reference oil price assumption of US$80-90 per barrel and
calls for approximately US$150-200 million to fund our exploration and development which we intend to fund through cash
flows from operations and cash-in-hand.

In  addition,  we  have  developed  downside  and  upside  work  program  scenarios  based  on  different  oil  prices  and  project
performance. The downside scenario work program considers a reference oil price assumption below US$70 per barrel and
consists of an alternative capital expenditure program of approximately US$100-150 million consisting mainly of certain low
risk  projects  with  shorter  payback  periods.  The  upside  scenario  work  program  considers  a  reference  oil  price  assumption
above US$90 per barrel or higher and consists of an alternative capital expenditure program of approximately US$200-250
million to be selected from identified projects designed to increase reserves and production.

To secure minimum oil prices for our 2024 production, we have commodity risk management contracts in place covering
a  portion  of  our  production  for  the  year  and  monitor  market  conditions  on  a  continuous  basis  to  evaluate  additional  new
commodity risk management contracts for the future. See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of our strategy, we continue to monitor the impact of oil price volatility on our financial condition, cash flows and

results of operations.

Our operations

We have a portfolio of assets that includes working and/or economic interests in 34 hydrocarbon blocks, 33 of which are
onshore  blocks,  including  10  in  production  as  of  December  31,  2023,  and  provides  the  ability  to  quickly  optimize  capital
allocation as market conditions change. Our assets give us access to more than 4.7 million gross exploratory and productive
acres.

Operations in Colombia

Our Colombian assets currently give us access to 3,401,000 gross exploratory and productive acres across 20 blocks in
what we believe to be one of South America’s most attractive oil and gas geographies. Since we entered Colombia in 2012, we
have  achieved  successful  exploration  and  development  activities  at  our  operated  Llanos  34  Block,  which  as  of
December 31, 2023, accounts for 66.8% of our production and 71.1% of our proved reserves in Colombia.

Highlights of the year ended December 31, 2023, related to our operations in Colombia included:

● Successful  drilling  and  putting  into  production  the  Saltador  1, Toritos  1,  Bisbita  Centro  1  exploration  wells  in  the

Llanos 123 Block;

● Successful  drilling  and  putting  into  production  the  Zorzal  1  and  Zorzal  Este-1  exploration  wells  in  the  Llanos  87

Block;

● Successful drilling and putting into production the Halcon 1 exploration well in the CPO-5 Block;

● Drilling campaign with 16 gross development wells drilled and putting into production in the Tigana, Tigui and Tua
oil fields in the Llanos 34 Block, including successful drilling and putting into production 5 horizontal wells in the
Tigana oil field;

● Photovoltaic solar system installed in the OBA export pipeline (running from the Platanillo block) that allows us to

reduce GHG emissions and reduce energy and maintenance costs;

● Average net oil production of 32,795 boepd in 2023 (33,640 boepd in 2022), influenced by a temporary shut-in of the
Indico 6 and Indico 7 wells in the CPO-5 Block from January to September 2023, reaching an exit production in the
fourth quarter of 2023 of 34,154 boepd;

● Proved  oil  and  gas  reserves  59.5  mmboe  at  year-end  2023  (64.6  mmboe  at  year-end  2022),  after  producing  11.2

mmboe;

47

Table of Contents

● Capital  expenditures  of  US$178.1  million  in  2023  (US$139.2  million  in  2022),  representing  an  89%  of  our  total

capital expenditures; and

● Operating  costs  levels  per  barrel  of  US$11.5  in  2023  (US$6.6  in  2022),  mainly  due  to  higher  energy  costs  in  the
Llanos 34 Block due to a drought that affected the energy matrix in Colombia as a result of decreased availability of
hydroelectric power.

Our interests in Colombia include working interests and economic interests. “Working interests” are direct participation
interests  granted  to  us  pursuant  to  an  E&P  contract  with  the ANH,  whereas  “economic  interests”  are  indirect  participation
interests in the net revenues from a given block based on bilateral agreements with the concessionaires.

The table below summarizes information about the blocks in Colombia in which we have working interests as of and for

the year ended December 31, 2023.

    Gross acres    
(thousand
acres)

 61.8
 148.3
 490.8

Working
interest(1)
100%
50%
30%

Partners(2)
—
Parex
ONGC Videsh

Operator
GeoPark
Parex
ONGC Videsh

Production
(boepd)

Basin
 — Putumayo
 — Llanos
 5,563 Llanos

 8.5

12.5%

Verano Energy

Verano Energy

 360 Llanos

 59.1
 255.5
 107.6
 89.2
 274.8
 88.3
 27.6
 74.1
 27.5
 102.8
 121.5
 114.6
 148.0
 589.0
 586.6

45%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
100%
50%
50%
100%
50%
50%
50%

Verano Energy
Hocol
Hocol
Parex
Hocol
Hocol
Hocol
Sierracol Energy
—
Sierracol Energy
Sierracol Energy
—
Sierracol Energy
Sierracol Energy
Sierracol Energy

GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
Parex
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark
GeoPark

 24,425 Llanos
 — Llanos
 68 Llanos
 — Llanos
 — Llanos
 352 Llanos
 — Llanos
 — Putumayo
Putumayo
 — Putumayo
 — Putumayo
 — Putumayo
 — Putumayo
 — Putumayo
 — Putumayo

 2,103

Block
Coatí
CPO-4-1
CPO-5

Llanos 32

Llanos 34
Llanos 86
Llanos 87
Llanos 94(4)
Llanos 104
Llanos 123
Llanos 124
Mecaya
Platanillo
PUT-8
PUT-9
PUT-14
PUT-36
Tacacho
Terecay

Concession
expiration year

Exploration: Currently suspended
Exploration: 2025
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2042-2045(3)
Exploration: 2022
Exploitation: 2040-2045(3)
Exploitation: 2039-2045(3)
Exploration: 2026
Exploration: 2023
Exploration: 2025
Exploration: 2026
Exploration: 2024
Exploration: 2024
Exploration: Currently suspended
Exploitation: 2033(3)
Exploration: 2024
Exploration: Currently suspended
In process of termination
Exploration: Currently suspended
In process of termination
In process of termination

(1) Working  interest  corresponds  to  the  working  interests  held  by  our  respective  subsidiaries  in  such  block,  net  of  any

working interests held by other parties in each block.

(2) Partners with working interests.
(3) The concession expiration year is set on a field-by-field basis.
(4) In process of transferring our working interest in the block to the partner.

As of December 31, 2023, we had net proved reserves of 56.3 mmboe in various blocks in the Llanos Basin, with the

Llanos 34 Block representing 83.6% of the reserves, and 3.2 mmboe in the Platanillo Block in the Putumayo Basin.

The table below summarizes information about the blocks in Colombia in which we have economic interests as of and for

the year ended December 31, 2023.

Block
Abanico

    Gross acres    
(thousand
acres)

 25.7

Economic
interest(1) Operator
10% Frontera

Production
(boepd)

Basin

 20 Magdalena

(1) Economic interest corresponds to indirect participation interests in the net revenues from the block, granted to us pursuant

to a joint operating agreement.

48

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Eastern Llanos Basin:

The Eastern Llanos Basin is a Cenozoic Foreland basin in the eastern region of Colombia. Two giant fields (Caño Limón
and  Castilla),  three  major  fields  (Rubiales,  Apiay  and  Tame  Complex)  and  approximately  fifty  minor  fields  had  been
discovered.  The  source  rock  for  the  basin  is  located  beneath  the  east  flank  of  the  Eastern  Cordillera,  as  a  mixed  marine-
continental shale basinal facies of the Gachetá formation. The main reservoirs of the basin are represented by the Paleogene
Carbonera,  Guadalupe  and  Mirador  sandstones.  Within  the  Cretaceous  sequence,  several  sandstones  are  also  considered  to
have good reservoirs.

Llanos  34  Block.  We  are  the  operator  of,  and  have  a  45%  working  interest  in,  the  Llanos  34  Block,  which  covers
approximately  59,085  gross  acres  (239  sq.  km.).  We  acquired  an  interest  in  and  took  operatorship  of  the  block  in  the  first
quarter  of  2012,  which  at  that  time  had  no  production,  reserves  or  wells  drilled  on  it,  and  with  210  sq.  km.  of  existing  3D
seismic data on which our team had mapped multiple exploration prospects. From 2012 to 2023 we engaged in exploration
and development activities that resulted in 10 new oil fields discoveries and increased proved reserves and oil production up to
a peak oil production of 34,995 bopd. Average net production in 2023 was 24,425 bopd and net reserves of 47.1 mmboe. By
the end of 2023, we have drilled more than 230 wells, with 166 producer wells that have accumulated more than 179 million
barrels of oil. The Llanos 34 Block has three reservoirs: the Guadalupe Formation, which produces 72% of our oil production
in the Block, Mirador, which produces 26% of our oil production in the Block and Gacheta, which produces 2% of our oil
production in the Block, with an API gravity between 12.7° and 30.6°. During these 12 years of operation in Llanos 34 Block,
we have built all the required infrastructure to produce and manage the fluids of the assets, including 10 production facilities,
81  kilometers  of  power  grid,  more  than  97  kilometers  of  flowlines  for  fluid  transfer,  169  kilometers  of  roads  and  a  42
kilometers oil pipeline. By the end of 2023, we have transported more than 72 million barrels of oil from Tigana and Jacana
fields through the ODCA pipeline further reducing truck traffic, contributing to the reduction of operational risk, shutdowns
(due to road blockades), costs and carbon emissions. In August 2022, we connected the Llanos-34 Block to the national power
grid,  reducing  the  risk  of  shutdown,  cost  and  carbon  emissions.  In  October  2023,  we  entered  into  an  interconnection
agreement through which we expect to have an additional 20 megawatts of power energy transmission capacity available for
our operations in Llanos 34 Block by early 2025.

Our  partner  in  the  Llanos  34  Block  is  Verano  Energy  (a  subsidiary  of  Parex),  which  has  a  55%  interest.  See  “—Our
operations.” We operate in the block pursuant to an E&P contract with the ANH. See “—Significant Agreements—Colombia
—E&P contracts—Llanos 34 Block E&P contract.”

Llanos 32 Block. We have a 12.5% working interest in the Llanos 32 Block. The Llanos 32 Block covers approximately
8,556 gross acres (35 sq. km.). Verano Energy is the operator of this block and has an 87.5% working interest. Since 2015, the
operator focused on the commissioning of a gas facility on this block to produce natural gas and light crude oil from the Une
formation  and  to  facilitate  shipment  of  processed  gas  south  to  the  adjacent  Llanos  34  Block.  For  the  year  ended
December 31, 2023, our average net production in the Llanos 32 Block was 360 bopd. As of the date of this annual report, we
do not aim to continue exploring on certain exploration acreage available in the Llanos 32 Block, and therefore, we will retain
interest on the existing producing fields only.

Abanico  Block.  In  October  1996,  Ecopetrol  and  Explotaciones  CMS  Nomeco  Inc.  entered  into  the  Abanico  Block
association  contract.  Frontera  Energy  Colombia  Corp  is  the  operator  of,  and  has  a  100%  working  interest  in,  the Abanico
Block, which covers an area of approximately 25,658 gross acres (103 sq. km.). We do not maintain a direct working interest
in the Abanico Block, but rather have a 10% economic interest in the net revenues from the block pursuant to a joint operating
agreement  initially  entered  into  with  Kappa  Resources  Colombia  Limited  (now  Frontera,  who  subsequently  assigned  its
participation  interest  to  Cepsa  Colombia  S.A.,  who  then  assigned  the  interest  to  Explotaciones  CMS  Oil  &  Gas),  Maral
Finance Corporation and Getionar S.A.

Llanos  86  and  Llanos  104  Blocks.  We  and  Hocol  (a  subsidiary  of  Ecopetrol),  each  with  fifty  percent  (50%)  working
interest  executed  an  E&P  contract  over  these  blocks  on  July  11,  2019,  as  a  result  of  the  Permanent  Competitive  Process
launched by ANH in 2019. We are the operator of these contracts that are in their exploratory phase 1 and cover approximately
530,309 gross acres (2,146 sq. km.). Due to the presence of indigenous communities in the area, we conducted the due prior
consultation process with these communities and reached agreements, thereby concluding the process on August 29, 2023. We
requested, and the ANH approved, an extension of the first phase of the exploratory

49

Table of Contents

period  in  the  Llanos  86  and  Llanos  104  Blocks  due  to  delays  attributable  to  the  environmental  authority  in  approving
environmental management measures. Accordingly, as of the date of this annual report, outstanding investment commitments
consist  of  acquisition  of  3D  seismic  and  drilling  of  one  exploratory  well  in  each  block  for  an  estimated  amount  of  US$9.8
million for Llanos 86 Block and US$8.8 million for Llanos 104 Block, before June 19, 2026.

Llanos 87 Block. We and Hocol, each with fifty percent (50%) working interest executed an E&P contract over this block
on July 11, 2019, as a result of the Permanent Competitive Process launched by ANH in 2019, and we are the operator of this
contract. As of the date of this annual report, the total investments needed to fulfill the exploratory activities committed in the
block have already been incurred and the ANH final acquittal-approval is pending. As a result of the activity performed during
the  exploratory  period,  we  made  two  discoveries  in  the  block: Tororoi  and  Zorzal. Therefore,  we  submitted  to  the ANH  an
appraisal program for each of Tororoi and Zorzal, which includes the drilling of one exploratory well during the two-year term
ending July 27, 2025. As of the date of this annual report, the ANH approval for the appraisal program is pending.

Llanos 123 and Llanos 124 Blocks: We and Hocol, each with fifty percent (50%) working interest executed E&P contracts
over these blocks on December 20, 2019, as a result of the Permanent Competitive Process launched by ANH in 2019. We are
the operator of these contracts that cover approximately 115,956 gross acres (469 sq. km.). Phase 1 commitments related to
these blocks corresponded to (i) reprocessing 3D seismic and drilling of two exploratory wells for Llanos 123 Block for an
estimated  amount  of  US$7.1  million  before  January  14,  2024,  and;  (ii)  the  acquisition  and  reprocessing  of  3D  seismic  and
drilling of three exploratory wells for Llanos 124 Block for an estimated amount of US$10.4 million before January 14, 2024.
As of the date of this annual report, the total investments needed to fulfill the commitments in the blocks have already been
incurred or transferred to another block, and the ANH approval is pending.

Llanos  94  Block.  On  July  24,  2019,  the  E&P  contract  was  awarded  to  Parex  Energy  as  a  result  of  the  Permanent
Competitive  Process  launched  by  ANH  in  2019.  We  acquired  a  50%  working  interest  from  Parex  and  obtained  ANH’s
approval to such transfer in May 2020. As a result of an extension in the exploratory period approved by the ANH in 2023, the
current Phase 1 commitments consist of drilling one exploratory well before October 1, 2025. However, we are not interested
in drilling such prospect and agreed to transfer our 50% working interest back to our partner and thus we are not liable for the
exploratory commitment in the block.

CPO-5 Block. On December 26, 2008, the E&P contract was executed between ONGC Videsh, as operator and the ANH
as  a  result  of  the  Competitive  Process  “Ronda  Colombia  2008”.  This  contract  covers  approximately  490,825  gross  acres
(1,986  sq.  km.).  We  hold  a  30%  working  interest  since  the  acquisition  of Amerisur  in  2020. As  of  the  date  of  this  annual
report, this contract is in exploratory phase 2 in which the pending commitment corresponds to the acquisition, processing and
interpretation of 73 sq. km. of 3D seismic for an amount of US$2.9 million, and drilling of one exploratory well for an amount
of US$6.4 million, to be fulfilled before May 18, 2027. As of the date of this annual report, the committed exploratory well
has already been drilled. There are two commercial fields called Mariposa and Indico, and we also had successful drilling and
putting into production exploration wells in the fields called Flamenco, Halcon and Perico. Average net production in 2023
was 5,563 bopd and net reserves were 6.3 mmboe.

CPO-4-1 Block. On January 18, 2022, the E&P contract was executed between Parex Energy and the ANH as a result of
the Permanent Competitive Process launched by ANH in 2019. On April 29, 2022, an amendment to the E&P contract was
executed,  whereby  the ANH  approved  the  assignment  of  a  50%  non-operated  working  interest  to  us. As  of  the  date  of  this
annual  report,  this  contract  is  in  exploratory  phase  1  and  covers  approximately  148,263  gross  acres  (600  sq.  km.).  The
outstanding investment commitment related to the block corresponds to the drilling of an exploratory well for an estimated
amount of US$2.9 million before September 19, 2025.

Magdalena Basin:

VIM-3  Block.  As  of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  the ANH  has  approved  the  termination  and  final  liquidation  of  the

contract is in process.

50

Table of Contents

Putumayo Basin:

Coati Block. We are the operator of and have a 100% working interest in the Coati Block, which covers approximately
61,843 gross acres (250 sq. km.). The outstanding exploration commitment consisted of the acquisition of 57 sq. km. of 3D
seismic and 30 km. of 2D seismic, for an estimated amount of US$4.5 million. The evaluation area is currently suspended. On
November 3, 2022, we submitted to the ANH a request to withdraw from the exploration period of the Coati E&P contract and
transfer the pending commitments to other E&P contracts. As of the date of this annual report, we completed the transfer of
the pending commitments in the block and the ANH approval is pending.

Mecaya Block. We are the operator of and have a 50% working interest in the Mecaya Block, which covers approximately
74,128 gross acres (300 sq. km.). Sierracol Energy is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest. As of the date of this
annual report, the contract is in unified phases 1 and 2 of the exploration period, which remaining exploration commitment
consists of the acquisition of 52.2 sq. km. of 3D seismic for an amount of US$0.6 million. On December 2010, the former
operator  declared  an  evaluation  area  and  presented  an  evaluation  program  for  the  Mecaya-1  well  (Mecaya  Evaluation
Program). Both the unified phases 1 and 2 and the evaluation program are currently suspended due to force majeure events
(relating to prior consultations).

Platanillo  Block.  We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  100%  working  interest  in  the  Platanillo  Block,  which  covers
approximately  27,500  gross  acres  (111  sq.  km.).  On  September  11,  2009,  we  began  the  commercial  exploitation  of  the
Platanillo Block. Average net production in 2023 was 2,103 bopd and net reserves of 3.2 mmboe.

Putumayo  8  Block.  We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  50%  working  interest  in  the  Putumayo  8  Block,  which  covers
approximately 102,800 gross acres (416 sq. km.). Sierracol Energy is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest. The
contract  is  in  unified  phases  1  and  2  of  the  exploration  period.  Outstanding  investment  commitments  of  US$13.1  million
related to this block correspond to the drilling of 3 exploratory wells and the acquisition of 112 sq. km. of 3D seismic before
June 14, 2024. Part of the 3D seismic committed in the block was acquired during 2020 and 2021. On October 25, 2022, we
submitted  to  the ANH  a  request  to  transfer  the  investment  commitment  related  to  the  pending  3D  seismic  to  the  Platanillo
Block,  and  the  partner  reported  the  transfer  of  the  outstanding  committed  value  to  one  of  its  blocks.  This  transfer  of
commitments is subject to authorization from the ANH. During 2023, the actions required to obtain environmental licenses
were  carried  out,  including  holding  of  a  public  environmental  hearing.  As  a  result,  in  August  2023,  the  environmental
authority granted the license for the Bienparado project, which was confirmed in January 2024. Additionally, the Nyctibius
project public environmental hearing is pending by the environmental licensing authority (Autoridad Nacional de Licencias
Ambientales or ANLA).

Putumayo  9  Block.  We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  50%  working  interest  in  the  Putumayo  9  Block,  which  covers
approximately 121,453 gross acres (491 sq. km.). Sierracol Energy is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest. As of
the date of this annual report, the contract is in phase 1 of the exploration period and outstanding investment commitments of
US$4.4  million  related  to  this  block  correspond  to  drilling  of  two  exploratory  wells  before  October  14,  2020,  and  the
acquisition  of  126.25  sq.  km.  of  3D  seismic.  Phase  1  was  suspended  on  June  25,  2019,  due  to  the  occurrence  of  a  force
majeure  event  consisting  of  the  issuance  of  the  Municipal  Agreement  No.  007  of  Puerto  Guzmán,  which  prohibits  the
hydrocarbon exploration and production activities in such municipality.

Putumayo 14 Block. We are the operator of and have a 100% working interest in the Putumayo 14 Block, which covers
approximately 114,560 gross acres (464 sq. km.). Exploration commitments in the block corresponded to the acquisition of 2D
seismic and drilling of an exploratory well for an estimated amount of US$16.1 million. On March 10, 2022, we submitted to
the ANH a request to withdraw from the PUT-14 E&P contract and transfer the pending commitments to the Platanillo and
CPO-5 Blocks. Once total investment is reached through such transfers, ANH will continue with the contract’s termination. As
of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  the  total  investment  needed  to  fulfill  the  commitments  has  already  been  incurred  and  the
ANH approval is pending.

Putumayo 36 Block. We are the operator of and have a 50% working interest in the Putumayo 36 Block, which covers
approximately 148,021 gross acres (599 sq. km.). Sierracol is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest. As part of the
prior consultation process, the Ministry of Interior certified the presence of one indigenous community in the area. As of the
date of this annual report, the contract is in phase 0 as the applicable prior consultation process must be completed.

51

Table of Contents

Only when this process has been completed and the corresponding regulatory approvals have been obtained, the blocks will
enter into phase 1, where the exploratory commitments are mandatory. The investment commitments for the block over the
three-year term of phase 1 would be the acquisition of 105.6 sq. km. of 3D seismic and the drilling of two exploratory wells
for an estimated amount of US$11.7 million. Prior consultation has not been initiated with the ethnic community due to the
restrictions from the issuance of Municipal Agreement No. 007 of Puerto Guzmán, which caused the current phase 0 of the
process to be suspended.

Tacacho and Terecay Blocks. We are the operator of and have a 50% working interest in the Tacacho and Terecay Blocks,
which  covers  approximately  589,009  gross  acres  (2,384  sq.  km.)  and  586,625  gross  acres  (2,374  sq.  km.),  respectively.
Sierracol  Energy  is  the  owner  of  the  remaining  50%  working  interest.  Both  contracts  are  in  phase  1,  which  is  currently
suspended  due  to  the  occurrence  of  force  majeure  events  related  to  social  and  public  order  conditions  of  the  area.  The
outstanding  investment  commitments  corresponded  to  (i)  the  acquisition,  processing  and  interpretation  of  480  km.  of  2D
seismic  for  the  Tacacho  Block  with  an  estimated  amount  of  US$1.2  million,  and;  (ii)  the  acquisition,  processing  and
interpretation of 476 km. of 2D seismic for the Terecay Block with an estimated amount of US$2.9 million. On September 21,
2022, we submitted to the ANH a request for termination of the E&P contract and, in January 2024, we submitted additional
third-party reports as supporting documentation to such request. As of the date of this annual report, the termination request is
under review by the ANH.

As  per  farm-out  agreement  executed  on  November  21,  2018,  Sierracol  Energy  shall  carry  us  in  certain  exploration

activities for the Mecaya, PUT-9, Tacacho and Terecay Contracts.

Andaquies,  Putumayo  12  and  Putumayo  30  Blocks.  As  of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  the  ANH  has  approved  the

termination and final liquidation of the contracts is in process.

Operations in Ecuador

Our Ecuadorian assets currently give us access to 33,300 of gross exploratory and productive acres across 2 blocks in an

attractive oil and gas geography.

Highlights of the year ended December 31, 2023, related to our operations in Ecuador include:

● Successful  drilling  and  putting  into  production  of  the  Perico  Centro  1  exploration  well,  and  the Yin  2  and  Perico

Norte 4 appraisal wells in the new combined structural/stratigraphic U-sand play in the Perico Block;

● Average  net  oil  production  of  926  boepd  in  2023  (848  boepd  in  2022),  reaching  an  exit  production  in  the  fourth

quarter of 2023 of 1,419 boepd;

● Proved oil reserves of 2.3 mmboe (100% in the Perico Block) at year-end 2023 (0.3 mmboe at year-end 2022), after

producing 0.3 mmboe;

● Capital expenditures of US$20.9 million in 2023 (US$18.5 million in 2022), representing an 11% of our total capital

expenditures.

The  table  below  summarizes  information  about  the  blocks  in  Ecuador  in  which  we  have  working  interests  as  of

December 31, 2023.

Block
Espejo

Perico

Gross
acres
(thousand
acres)

 15.6

 17.7

Working
interest (1)

50%

50%

Operator
GeoPark

Frontera

Production
(boepd)

Basin

 67

Oriente

 859

Oriente

Expiration
concession year
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2045
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2045

(1) Working  interest  corresponds  to  the  working  interests  held  by  our  respective  subsidiaries  in  such  block,  net  of  any

working interests held by other parties in each block.

52

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Espejo and Perico blocks

In May 2019, we signed participation contracts for the Espejo and Perico Blocks. We are the operator of the Espejo Block
with  a  50%  working  interest,  and  Frontera  is  the  operator  of  the  Perico  Block  with  50%  working  interest.  We  assumed  a
commitment of carrying out 3D seismic and drilling four exploration wells in the Espejo Block for an estimated amount of
US$20.9  million  during  the  first  exploratory  period  ending  June  17,  2025  and  drilling  four  exploratory  wells  in  the  Perico
Block for an estimated amount of US$18.1 million during the first exploratory period ending June 16, 2025. As of the date of
this  annual  report,  we  have  drilled  the  four  exploratory  wells  in  the  Perico  Block  (hence  Perico  Block  does  not  have  any
pending  exploratory  commitments)  and  we  have  completed  the  acquisition  of  60  sq  km  of  3D  seismic  and  drilled  two
exploratory wells in the Espejo Block.

Operations in Brazil

Our  Brazilian  assets  currently  give  us  access  to  61,400  of  gross  exploratory  and  productive  acres  across  6  blocks  (5

exploratory blocks and the BCAM-40 Concession, which is in production phase) in an attractive oil and gas geography.

Highlights of the year ended December 31, 2023, related to our operations in Brazil included:

● Average net oil and gas production of 1,027 boepd (98.5% gas) in 2023 (1,516 boepd in 2022); and

● Proved oil and gas reserves in the Manati Block of 1.5 mmboe at year-end 2023 (from 1.6 mmboe at year-end 2022),

after producing 0.4 mmboe.

The  following  table  sets  forth  information  as  of  December  31,  2023,  on  our  concessions  in  Brazil  in  which  we  have  a

current or future working interest:

Concession
POT-T-785

REC-T 58

REC-T 67

REC-T 77

POT-T 834

    Gross acres    
(thousand
acres)

 7.9

 7.8

7.7

7.7

7.5

Working
interest(1)
70%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Partners
Petroil

—

—

—

—

Operator
GeoPark

GeoPark

GeoPark

GeoPark

GeoPark

Production
(boepd)

Basin

 — Potiguar

 — Recôncavo

 — Recôncavo

 — Recôncavo

 — Potiguar

Manati

 22.8

10%

Petrobras; Enauta; Gas
Bridge Storage S.A.

Petrobras

 1,027

Camamu-
Almada

Concession
expiration year
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2050
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2052
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2052
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2052
Exploration: 2025
Exploitation: 2052

Exploitation: 2029

(1) Working  interest  corresponds  to  the  working  interests  held  by  our  respective  subsidiaries  in  such  block,  net  of  any

working interests held by other parties in each block.

Manati Field

We have a 10% working interest in the BCAM-40 Concession, which originally included an interest in the Manati Field,
which is located in the Camamu-Almada Basin. Petrobras is the operator of, and has a 35% working interest in, the BCAM-40
Concession, which covers approximately 22,784 gross acres (92.2 sq. km.). In addition to us, Petrobras’ partners in the block
are Gas Bridge Storage S.A. and Enauta Energia S.A. (Enauta), with 10% and 45% working interests, respectively. Petrobras
operates the BCAM-40 Concession pursuant to a concession agreement with the ANP, executed on August 6, 1998. See “—
Significant  Agreements—Brazil—Overview  of  concession  agreements—BCAM-40  Concession  Agreement.” 
In
September 2009, Petrobras announced the relinquishment of BCAM-40’s exploration area within the concession to the ANP,
except for the Manati Field.

53

   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

The Manati Field is located 65 km. south of Salvador, offshore at a water depth of 35 meters. The field was discovered in
October  2000,  and,  in  2002,  Petrobras  declared  the  field  commercially  viable.  Production  began  in  January  2007.  As  of
December  31,  2023,  11  wells  had  been  drilled  in  the  Manati  Field,  6  of  which  are  productive  and  connected  to  a  fixed
production platform installed at a depth of 35 meters, located 9 km. from the coast of the State of Bahia. From the platform,
the gas flows by sea and land through a 125 km. pipeline to the Estação Vandemir Ferreira or EVF gas treatment plant. The
gas is sold to Petrobras up to a maximum volume as determined in the existing Petrobras gas sales agreement.

POT-T-785 Concession

The POT-T-785 block covers an area of 7,875 acres in the Potiguar Basin, surrounded by producing fields operated by
Petrobras.  Total  commitment  to  the ANP  was  R$1.2  million  (US$0.2  million,  at  the  December  31,  2023,  exchange  rate  of
R$5.22 to US$1.00) during the first exploratory period and is equivalent to acquiring 4 sq. km. of 3D seismic and performing
geochemical analysis before April 29, 2025. In 2023, preliminary activities for the environmental licensing have started. As of
December 31, 2023, the estimated remaining commitment in the POT-T-785 block amounts to US$0.1 million.

POT-T-834, REC-T-58, REC-T-67 and REC-T-77 Concessions

During ANP’s First Open Acreage Bid Round held in September 2019, we were awarded four exploratory blocks, one in
the Potiguar Basin (Block POT-T-834) and three on the Recôncavo Basin (Blocks REC-T-58, REC-T-67 and REC-T-77). The
Concession Agreements  were  executed  in  February  2020.  In  2023,  we  started  preliminary  activities  for  the  environmental
licensing  in  Block  POT-T-834. As  of  December  31,  2023,  the  estimated  commitment  in  the  blocks  to  be  executed  before
February 14, 2025, amounted to US$0.6 million.

Operations in Chile

In  December  2023,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  to  sell  our  Chilean  subsidiaries  which  comprised  the  entirety  of  our
business in the country. The divestment transaction closed in January 2024 and, as part of the transaction, we have retained
certain rights over unconventional activities that would be carried out in the Fell Block over the current operating contract in
the future.

The  table  below  summarizes  information  about  the  blocks  in  Chile  in  which  we  had  working  interests  as  of  and  for

the year ended December 31, 2023.

Block
Fell
Isla Norte

Campanario

Flamenco

Gross
acres
(thousand
acres)

 367.8
 97.7

 144.2

 47.1

Working
interest (1)
100%
60%

50%

50%

Partners (2)
—
ENAP

Operator
GeoPark
GeoPark

Production
(boepd)

Basin

 1,720 Magallanes
 — Magallanes

ENAP

GeoPark

 — Magallanes

ENAP

GeoPark

 — Magallanes

Concession
expiration year
Exploitation: 2032
Exploration: 2024
Exploitation: 2044
Exploration: 2024
Exploitation: 2045
Exploitation: 2044

(1) Working  interest  corresponds  to  the  working  interests  held  by  our  respective  subsidiaries  in  such  block,  net  of  any

working interests held by other parties in each block.

(2) Partners with working interests.

Fell Block

In 2006, we became the operator and 100% interest owner of the Fell Block. When we first acquired an interest in the Fell

Block in 2002, it had no material oil and gas production. Since then, we completed more than 1,100 sq. km. of 3D

54

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

seismic surveys and drilled 141 exploration and development wells. In the year ended December 31, 2023, we produced an
average of 1,720 boepd in the Fell Block, consisting of 87.2% gas.

Tierra del Fuego Blocks (Isla Norte, Campanario and Flamenco Blocks)

In 2012, we entered into three CEOPs with ENAP and Chile granting us working interests in the Isla Norte, Campanario
and Flamenco Blocks, located in the center-north of the Tierra del Fuego Province of Chile. We were the operator of the three
blocks, with working interests of 60%, 50% and 50%, respectively. As of the date of closing of the divestment transaction,
there  were  outstanding  investment  commitments  of  US$0.9  million  and  US$5.0  million  related  to  the  Isla  Norte  and
Campanario  Blocks,  respectively,  and  pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  divestment  transaction,  we  remain  liable  for  such
outstanding investment commitments.

Operations in Argentina

The table below summarizes information about the blocks in Argentina in which we had working interests as of and for

the year ended December 31, 2023.

Block
Puelen
Los Parlamentos

Gross
acres
(thousand
acres)

 260.2
 330.9

Working
interest (1)
18%
50%

Operator
Pluspetrol
YPF

Production
(boepd)

Basin
 — Neuquén
 — Neuquén

Expiration
concession year
In process of relinquishment
Exploration: 2023

(1) Working  interest  corresponds  to  the  working  interests  held  by  our  respective  subsidiaries  in  such  block,  net  of  any

working interests held by other parties in each block.

Puelen Block

On August 20, 2014, the consortium of Pluspetrol and us was awarded the exploration license in the Puelen Block, as part
of  the  2014  Mendoza  Bidding  Round  in Argentina,  carried  out  by  Empresa  Mendocina  de  Energía  S.A.  (“EMESA”).  The
consortium consists of Pluspetrol (operator with a 72% working interest), EMESA (non-operator with a 10% working interest)
and us (non-operator with an 18% working interest). As of December 31, 2023, we fulfilled the total commitments and are in
process of relinquishing the block.

Los Parlamentos Block

In  June  2018,  we  announced  the  acquisition  of  a  50%  working  interest  in  the  Los  Parlamentos  exploratory  block  in
partnership  with  YPF,  the  largest  oil  and  gas  producer  in  Argentina.  In  accordance  with  the  partnership  agreement,  YPF
assumed  the  operatorship  of  the  block  and  we  assumed  a  commitment  which  amounted  to  US$6  million  at  our  working
interest. On October 27, 2023, we agreed to transfer our 50% working interest in the Los Parlamentos Block to YPF and thus,
once  formally  approved  by  local  authorities,  we  will  no  longer  be  liable  to  remaining  capital  commitments  or  other  legal
obligations resulting from our participation in the block.

55

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Oil and natural gas reserves and production

Our reserves

The following table sets forth our oil and natural gas net proved reserves as of December 31, 2023, which is based on the

D&M Reserves Report.

Net proved reserves
As of December 31, 2023
Total net
proved
reserves
(mmboe)(1)

Natural gas
(bcf)

Oil
(mmbbl)

Net proved developed

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile

Total net proved developed

Net proved undeveloped

Colombia
Ecuador
Chile

Total net proved undeveloped (2)

Total net proved (Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile)

 43.1
 1.0
 0.0
 0.6
 44.8

 16.2
 1.3
 0.5
 18.0

 62.8

 1.1
 —
 8.9
 10.0
 19.9

 —
 —
 0.9
 0.9

 43.3
 1.0
 1.5
 2.3
 48.1

 16.2
 1.3
 0.6
 18.1

% Oil

 99.6 %
 100.0 %
 1.9 %
 27.2 %
 93.1 %

 100.0 %
 100.0 %
 77.1 %
 99.2 %

 20.8

 66.2

 94.8 %

(1) We calculate one barrel of oil equivalent as six mcf of natural gas.
(2) We plan to put 100% of our reported 2023 year-end proved undeveloped reserves into production through activities to be

implemented within five years of initial disclosure.

We had net proved reserves of 66.2 mmboe at December 31, 2023, compared to net proved reserves of 70.4 mmboe as of

December 31, 2022.

The 6% decrease in net proved reserves in 2023 is mainly attributable to:

● Production of 12.5 mmboe; and

● Lower-than-expected performance from the existing wells in Chile by 0.4 mmbbl.

This was partially offset by:

● Extensions  and  discoveries  that  resulted  in  an  increase  of  4.5  mmboe  in  various  fields  in  the  Llanos  Basin  in

Colombia and the Jandaya field extension in the Perico Block in Ecuador;

● Changes in a previously adopted development plan in Colombia, resulting in 1.7 mmbbl increase;

● Higher-than-expected  performance  from  the  existing  wells  in  Colombia  and  Brazil,  resulting  in  an  increase  of  1.5

mmbbl and 0.3 mmboe, respectively;

● Changes in the royalties payment in certain fields in Colombia from kind to cash, resulting in a 0.4 mmboe increase;

and

● Higher average prices in Ecuador, resulting in a 0.3 mmboe increase.

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  we  had  4.3  mmboe  of  our  proved  undeveloped  reserves  from
December 31, 2022, converted to proved developed reserves due to development drilling in various blocks in the Llanos Basin
in Colombia. For further information relating to the reconciliation of our net proved reserves for the years ended

56

Table of Contents

December  31,  2023,  2022  and  2021,  please  see  Table  5  included  in  Note  38  (unaudited)  to  our  Consolidated  Financial
Statements.

Internal controls over reserves estimation process

We  maintain  an  internal  staff  of  petroleum  engineers  and  geosciences  professionals  who  work  closely  with  our
independent reserves engineers to ensure the integrity, accuracy and timeliness of data furnished to our independent reserves
engineers  in  their  estimating  process  and  who  have  knowledge  of  the  specific  properties  under  evaluation.  Our  Chief
Technical Officer, Augusto Zubillaga, is primarily responsible for overseeing the preparation of our reserves estimates and for
the  internal  control  over  our  reserves  estimation.  He  has  over  26  years  of  experience  in  production,  engineering,  well
completion, corrosion control, reservoir management and field development. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees—A. Directors and executive officers.”

In order to ensure the quality and consistency of our reserves estimates and reserves disclosures, we maintain and comply

with a reserves process that satisfies the following key control objectives:

● estimates are prepared using generally accepted practices and methodologies;

● estimates are prepared objectively and free of bias;

● estimates and changes therein are prepared on a timely basis;

● estimates and changes therein are properly supported and approved; and

● estimates and related disclosures are prepared in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Throughout each fiscal year, our technical team meets with Independent Qualified Reserves Engineers, who are provided
with full access to complete and accurate information pertaining to the properties to be evaluated and all applicable personnel.
This  independent  assessment  of  the  internally-generated  reserves  estimates  is  beneficial  in  ensuring  that  interpretations  and
judgments are reasonable and that the estimates are free of preparer and management bias.

Recognizing that reserves estimates are based on interpretations and judgments, differences between the proved reserves
estimates prepared by us and those prepared by an Independent Qualified Reserves Engineer of 10% or less, in aggregate, are
considered to be within the range of reasonable differences. Differences greater than 10% must be resolved in the technical
meetings.  Once  differences  are  resolved,  the  independent  Qualified  Reserves  Engineer  sends  a  preliminary  copy  of  the
reserves report to be reviewed by the Corporate Reserves team, the Executive Committee (integrated by the Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technical Officer, Chief Exploration Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy,
Sustainability and Legal Officer and Chief People Officer) and the Technical Committee (composed by four technical experts
of our board of directors). A final copy of the Reserves Report is sent by the Independent Qualified Reserve Engineer to be
reviewed and analyzed by the Technical Committee which recommends to the Board of Directors to approve its disclosure and
publication. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—Committees of our board of
directors.”

Independent reserves engineers

Reserves estimates as of December 31, 2023, for Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Chile included elsewhere in this annual
report  are  based  on  the  D&M  Reserves  Report,  dated  March  1,  2024,  and  effective  as  of  December  31,  2023.  The  D&M
Reserves  Report,  a  copy  of  which  has  been  filed  as  an  exhibit  to  this  annual  report,  was  prepared  in  accordance  with  SEC
rules, regulations, definitions and guidelines at our request in order to estimate reserves and for the areas and period indicated
therein.

DeGolyer and MacNaughton Corp. (“DeGolyer and MacNaughton” or “D&M), a Delaware corporation with offices in
Dallas, Houston, Moscow, Algiers, Astana and Buenos Aires has been providing consulting services to the oil and gas industry
since  1936.  The  firm  has  more  than  200  professionals,  including  engineers,  geologists,  geophysicists,  petrophysicists  and
economists  that  are  engaged  in  the  appraisal  of  oil  and  gas  properties,  the  evaluation  of  hydrocarbon  and  other  mineral
prospects, basin evaluations, comprehensive field studies and equity studies related to the domestic and international energy
industry. DeGolyer and MacNaughton restricts its activities exclusively to consultation and does not

57

Table of Contents

accept contingency fees, nor does it own operating interests in any oil, gas or mineral properties, or securities or notes of its
clients. The firm subscribes to a code of professional conduct, and its employees actively support their related technical and
professional societies. The firm is a Texas Registered Engineering Firm.

The D&M Reserves Report covered 100% of our total reserves. In connection with the preparation of the D&M Reserves
Report,  DeGolyer  and  MacNaughton  prepared  its  own  estimates  of  our  proved  reserves.  In  the  process  of  the  reserves
evaluation, DeGolyer and MacNaughton did not independently verify the accuracy and completeness of information and data
furnished  by  us  with  respect  to  ownership  interests,  oil  and  gas  production,  well  test  data,  historical  costs  of  operation  and
development, product prices, or any agreements relating to current and future operations of the fields and sales of production.
However, if in the course of the examination something came to the attention of DeGolyer and MacNaughton that brought into
question  the  validity  or  sufficiency  of  any  such  information  or  data,  DeGolyer  and  MacNaughton  did  not  rely  on  such
information  or  data  until  it  had  satisfactorily  resolved  its  questions  relating  thereto  or  had  independently  verified  such
information or data. DeGolyer and MacNaughton independently prepared reserves estimates to conform to the guidelines of
the SEC, including the criteria of “reasonable certainty,” as it pertains to expectations about the recoverability of reserves in
future  years,  under  existing  economic  and  operating  conditions,  consistent  with  the  definition  in  Rule  4  10(a)(1)-(32)  of
Regulation S-X. DeGolyer and MacNaughton issued the D&M Reserves Report based upon its evaluation. D&M’s primary
economic  assumptions  in  estimates  included  oil  and  gas  sales  prices  determined  according  to  SEC  guidelines,  future
expenditures and other economic assumptions (including interests, royalties and taxes) as provided by us. The assumptions,
data, methods and procedures used, including the percentage of our total reserves reviewed in connection with the preparation
of the D&M Reserves Report were appropriate for the purpose served by such report, and DeGolyer and MacNaughton used
all methods and procedures as it considered necessary under the circumstances to prepare such reports.

However,  uncertainties  are  inherent  in  estimating  quantities  of  reserves,  including  many  factors  beyond  our  and  our
independent reserves engineers’ control. Reserves engineering is a subjective process of estimating subsurface accumulations
of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserves estimate is a function of
the  quality  of  available  data  and  its  interpretation.  As  a  result,  estimates  by  different  engineers  often  vary,  sometimes
significantly. In addition, physical factors such as the results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an
estimate, economic factors such as changes in product prices or development and production expenses, and regulatory factors,
such as royalties, development and environmental permitting and concession terms, may require revision of such estimates.
Our  operations  may  also  be  affected  by  unanticipated  changes  in  regulations  concerning  the  oil  and  gas  industry  in  the
countries in which we operate, which may impact our ability to recover the estimated reserves. Accordingly, oil and natural
gas quantities ultimately recovered will vary from reserves estimates.

Technology used in reserves estimation

According to SEC guidelines, proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of geoscience and
engineering  data,  can  be  estimated  with  “reasonable  certainty”  to  be  economically  producible—from  a  given  date  forward,
from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations—prior to the
time  at  which  contracts  providing  the  right  to  operate  expire,  unless  evidence  indicates  that  renewal  is  reasonably  certain,
regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation.

The  project  to  extract  the  hydrocarbons  must  have  commenced  or  the  operator  must  be  reasonably  certain  that  it  will
commence the project within a reasonable time. The term “reasonable certainty” implies a high degree of confidence that the
quantities  of  oil  and/or  natural  gas  actually  recovered  will  equal  or  exceed  the  estimate.  Reasonable  certainty  can  be
established using techniques that have been proved effective by actual production from projects in the same reservoir or an
analogous reservoir or by other evidence using reliable technology that establishes reasonable certainty. Reliable technology is
a  grouping  of  one  or  more  technologies  (including  computational  methods)  that  have  been  field  tested  and  have  been
demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an
analogous formation.

There  are  various  generally  accepted  methodologies  for  estimating  reserves  including  volumetrics,  decline  analysis,
material balance, simulation models and analogies. Estimates may be prepared using either deterministic (single estimate) or
probabilistic  (range  of  possible  outcomes  and  probability  of  occurrence)  methods. The  particular  method  chosen  should  be
based on the evaluator’s professional judgment as being the most appropriate, given the geological nature of the

58

Table of Contents

property, the extent of its operating history and the quality of available information. It may be appropriate to employ several
methods in reaching an estimate for the property.

Estimates  must  be  prepared  using  all  available  information  (open  and  cased  hole  logs,  core  analyses,  geologic  maps,
seismic  interpretation,  production/injection  data  and  pressure  test  analysis).  Supporting  data,  such  as  working  interest,
royalties and operating costs, must be maintained and updated when such information materially changes.

Proved undeveloped reserves

As  of  December  31,  2023,  we  had  18.1  mmboe  in  proved  undeveloped  reserves,  a  decrease  of  0.1  mmboe,  or  1%,
compared  to  our  December  31,  2022,  proved  undeveloped  reserves  of  18.2  mmboe.  Changes  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2023, include:

(i)

(ii)

a  decrease  of  4.3  mmboe  in  Colombia  due  to  the  conversion  of  proved  undeveloped  reserves  to  proved
developed reserves in various fields in the Llanos Basin;

a decrease of 0.8 mmboe due to a lower-than-expected performance in Colombia (0.6 mmboe) and Ecuador (0.2
mmboe); and

(iii)

a decrease of 0.1 mmboe due to lower average gas prices in Chile.

This was partially offset by:

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

an increase of 1.7 mmbbl in Colombia due to a change in a previously adopted development plan;

an increase of 1.4 mmboe in Colombia due to the discoveries of various fields in the Llanos Basin;

an increase of 1.2 mmboe in Ecuador due to the extension in the Jandaya field in the Hollin reservoir and the
discovery of the Ui reservoir in the Perico Block;

(vii)

an increase of 0.3 mmboe due to higher-than-expected performance in Chile;

(viii)

an  increase  of  0.3  mmboe  due  to  change  in  the  royalties’  payment  in  certain  fields  in  Colombia  from  kind  to
cash; and

(ix)

an increase of 0.2 mmboe due to higher average oil prices in Ecuador.

Of our 18.1 mmboe of net proved undeveloped reserves, 16.2 mmboe (89.5%)1.3 mmboe (7.1%) and 0.6 mmboe (3.4%)
were located in Colombia, Ecuador and Chile, respectively. No net proved undeveloped reserves were located in Brazil as of
December 31, 2023.

During  2023,  we  incurred  approximately  US$52.2  million  in  capital  expenditures  in  Colombia  to  convert  such  proved

undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves.

59

Table of Contents

The  following  table  shows  the  evolution  of  total  net  proved  undeveloped  (“PUD”)  reserves  in  the  year  ended

December 31, 2023.

Total Net Proved Undeveloped (“PUD”) Reserves at December 31, 2022
(All amounts shown in mmboe)

Plus: Extensions, discoveries and acquisitions:
-Colombia
-Ecuador
Less: PUD Reserves converted to proved developed reserves:
-Colombia
Plus/less: PUD Reserves revisions and movement to/from other categories:
-Colombia
-Chile

Total Net Proved Undeveloped (“PUD”) Reserves at December 31, 2023

Production, revenues and price history

 18.2

 1.4
 1.2

 (4.3)

 1.4
 0.2
 18.1

The following table sets forth certain information on our production of oil and natural gas in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil,

Chile and Argentina for each of the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Average daily production(1)
As of December 31, 
2022
    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Arg (2)     Colombia     Brazil     Chile     Arg (2)

2021

2023

Oil production
Average crude oil
production (bopd)
Average sales price
of crude oil
(US$/bbl)
Natural Gas
production
Average natural gas
production (mcfpd)
Average sales price
of natural gas
(US$/mcf)
Oil and gas
production cost
Average operating
cost (US$/boe)
Average royalties 
and economic rights 
in cash  (US$/boe)
Average production
cost (US$/boe)(3)

 32,795

 926

 16

 221

 33,640

 848

 21

 441

 80

 30,920

 26

 313

 1,215

 66.8

 69.9

 82.1

 68.0

 82.7

 89.9

 103.1

 94.7

 56.7

 58.3

 70.2

 62.8

 56.4

 573

 —  6,065

 8,993

 776

 —  8,967

 11,387

 416

 1,374

 11,357

 12,507

 5,529

 3.9

 —

 6.5

 3.4

 4.5

 —

 6.4

 3.8

 2.0

 4.4

 5.2

 3.4

 2.7

 11.5

 37.5

 10.9

 13.0

 6.6

 27.1

 7.4

 16.1

 24.0

 6.5

 4.6

 12.3

 20.8

 7.9

 19.4

 —

 3.1

 0.9

 37.5

 14.0

 13.9

 21.0

 27.6

 —

 3.1

 1.5

 5.0

 27.1

 10.5

 17.6

 29.0

 9.6

 16.2

 2.6

 7.2

 0.9

 6.1

 13.2

 26.9

(1) We  present  production  figures  net  of  interests  due  to  others,  but  before  deduction  of  royalties,  economic  rights  and
government’s  production  share,  as  we  believe  that  net  production  before  royalties,  economic  rights  and  government’s
production  share  is  more  appropriate  in  light  of  our  foreign  operations  and  the  attendant  royalty,  economic  rights  and
government’s production share regimes.

(2) “Arg” is Argentina.
(3) Calculated pursuant to FASB ASC 932.

60

Table of Contents

The  following  table  sets  forth  certain  information  on  our  production  of  oil  and  natural  gas  by  final  product  sold  in

Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile and Argentina for each of the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Tigana oil field(1)
Jacana oil field(1)
Rest of Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Total

2023

2022

2021

    Oil
Mbbl
3,904
4,411
3,655
338
6
81
 —
12,395

    Gas
MMcf

    Oil
Mbbl
 — 4,057
 — 4,678
3,543
209
 310
 —
8
2,214
161
3,283
 —
29
12,786
5,705

    Gas
MMcf

    Oil
Mbbl
 — 3,670
 — 4,023
2,747
 283
 —
 —
9
3,273
100
4,156
434
152
10,983
7,864

    Gas
MMcf
 —
 —
 502
 —
3,796
4,403
1,584
10,285

(1) The Tigana (discovered in 2013) and Jacana (discovered in 2015) oil fields in Colombia are separately included in the
table above as those oil fields individually contain more than 15% of our total proved reserves as of each of the years
indicated above.

Drilling activities

The following table sets forth the exploratory wells we drilled during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

2023

Exploratory wells(1)

2022

    Colombia    Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Colombia    Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Colombia     Brazil

2021
    Chile     Argentina

 7.0
 3.3

 6.0
 2.8

 3.0
 1.5

 —
 —

 —  —
 —  —

 13.0
 6.0

 3.0
 1.5

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 4.0
 2.6

 4.0
 2.3

 8.0
 4.9

 4.0
 2.0

 —
 —

 4.0
 2.0

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 3.0
 1.9

 3.0
 0.8

 6.0
 2.7

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

Productive(2)

Gross
Net
Dry(3)
Gross
Net
Total

Gross
Net

(1) Includes appraisal wells.
(2) A productive well is an exploratory, development, or extension well that is not a dry well.
(3) A dry well is an exploratory, development, or extension well that proves to be incapable of producing either oil or gas in

sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.

61

Table of Contents

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  development  wells  we  drilled  during  the  years  ended  December  31,  2023,  2022  and

2021.

Productive(1)

Gross
Net
Dry(2)
Gross
Net
Total

Gross
Net

Development wells
2022
    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Colombia     Brazil     Chile     Argentina

2023

2021

 25.0
 11.8

 7.0
 3.7

 32.0
 15.5

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 28.0
 12.0

 2.0
 0.9

 30.0
 12.9

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 1.0
 1.0

 1.0
 1.0

 2.0
 2.0

 24.0
 10.8

 —
 —

 24.0
 10.8

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

 —
 —

(1) A productive well is an exploratory, development, or extension well that is not a dry well.
(2) A dry well is an exploratory, development, or extension well that proves to be incapable of producing either oil or gas in

sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.

Developed and undeveloped acreage

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our total gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage in

Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile and Argentina as of December 31, 2023.

Total developed acreage

Gross
Net

Total undeveloped acreage

Gross
Net

Total developed and undeveloped acreage

Gross
Net

    Colombia     Ecuador    

Acreage(1)
Brazil
(in thousands of acres)

Chile

    Argentina

 25.2
 13.0

 3,350.4
 1,672.4

 3,375.6
 1,685.4

 1.1
 0.6

 32.2
 16.1

 33.3
 16.7

 4.1
 0.4

 57.3
 38.1

 61.4
 38.5

 5.6
 5.6

 651.2
 516.5

 656.8
 522.1

 —
 —

 591.1
 212.3

 591.1
 212.3

(1) Developed acreage is defined as acreage assignable to productive wells. Undeveloped acreage is defined as acreage on
which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of
oil or gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves. Net acreage is based on our working interest.

62

   
Table of Contents

Productive wells

The following table sets forth our total gross and net productive wells as of February 29, 2024. Productive wells consist of
producing  wells  and  wells  capable  of  producing,  including  natural  gas  wells  awaiting  pipeline  connections  to  commence
deliveries and oil wells awaiting connection to production facilities. Gross wells are the total number of producing wells in
which we have an interest, and net wells are the sum of our fractional working interests owned in gross wells.

Oil wells
Gross
Net

Gas wells
Gross
Net

Productive wells(1)

    Colombia     Ecuador

Brazil

 206.0
 104.1

 2.0
 0.3

 8.0
 4.0

 -
 -

 -
 -

 6.0
 0.6

(1) Includes wells drilled by other operators, prior to our commencing operations, and wells drilled in blocks in which we are

not the operator. A productive well is an exploratory, development, or extension well that is not a dry well.

Present activities

From  January  1,  2024,  to  February  29,  2024,  we  produced  a  net  average  of  approximately  36.1  mboepd,  including
production  from  our  operations  in  Chile  up  to,  and  including,  January  18,  2024  (the  date  on  which  the  transaction  for  the
divestment of our operations in Chile closed).

The main highlights of the 2024 drilling campaign year-to-date are detailed as follows:

● we drilled the Perico 1 well in the CPO-5 Block in Colombia, which tested oil in the northern part of the block, next

to the Llanos 34 Block;

● we drilled the Tigana Horizontal Well 7 and two injector wells in the Llanos 34 Block in Colombia, continuing the

horizontal drilling campaign as well as expanding our water flooding project; and

● we drilled the Perico Norte 5 well in the Perico Block in Ecuador, which tested oil, representing the fourth successful

well drilled in the new U-sand play.

Marketing and delivery commitments

Colombia

Our production in Colombia consists primarily of crude oil which is sold according to price formulas based on market
reference indices (Brent price, Vasconia and Oriente differential) and discounts that consider transportation costs and quality
adjustments.

During 2023, our sales were allocated on a competitive basis to leading industry participants, including traders and other
producers.  We  continued  to  deliver  at  both  at  well-head  and  at  various  points  in  the  Colombian  pipeline  system  and  via
Ecuador for the Putumayo production.

Our sales strategy is aimed at securing the highest available pricing for our production while securing a reliable and safe
path  to  market. To  that  end,  we  focus  on  developing  synergies  and  strategic  partnerships  with  both  clients  and  the  national
transport  systems,  in  order  to  obtain  a  reduction  in  costs  and  increased  revenues  by  making  use  of  the  best  alternatives
available. Such is the case of the implementation of an unloading facility at Jaguey Station in partnership with Oleoducto de
Los  Llanos  Orientales  S.A.  (ODL)  in  2015.  This  unloading  facility  is  located  42  km.  away  from  the  Llanos  34  Block  and
allowed for reduced trucking distance and associated costs. Additionally, during 2019 we completed a project to connect the
Llanos 34 Block to the ODL pipeline via a flowline. In the third quarter of 2019, we started sending our

63

   
Table of Contents

Jacana production volumes via this flowline to the ODL pipeline, eliminating trucking for that portion of our production and
allowing further cost efficiencies and increased operational reliability. In November 2020, the flowline was converted into the
Oleoducto  del  Casanare  (“ODCA”)  receiving  full  authorization  from  the  Ministry  of  Energy  and  Mines  to  operate  as  such,
determining  the  regulated  tariff  and  allowing  the  transportation  of  third-party  crudes.  In  2020,  we  also  inaugurated  an
unloading  facility  in  Jacana,  allowing  for  volumes  of  other  fields  to  be  transported  via  the  ODCA. At  the  end  of  2020,  we
connected  the  Tigana  field  to  ODCA,  further  reducing  transport  of  our  volumes  via  truck.  Since  2021,  ODCA  has  been  a
central piece of our crude transportation in Colombia, including volumes of Jacana, Tigana and other fields. In 2021, we also
entered  into  an  agreement  to  connect  the  third  party  owned  Cabrestero  Block  to  ODCA,  which  allows  us  to  transport  third
party  crude.  The  connection  was  completed  during  the  first  half  of  2022,  and  we  began  to  transport  third-party  crude  oil
through the ODCA. In 2023, we reached an agreement with Ecopetrol to transport the royalties and economic rights paid in
kind  of  the  Jacana,  Tigana  and  Tua  fields  through  ODCA,  increasing  third-party  crudes  transported  through  ODCA  and
therefore, optimizing the use of the available capacity. In addition, we are developing a dilution project at Tigana Station with
our  partner  in  the  Llanos  34  Block,  which  will  allow  to  increase  the  volume  transported  through  ODCA,  reducing
transportation costs.

In the case of the Platanillo Block in the Putumayo Basin, we gather the crude via truck and flowlines to pump it towards
Ecuador via the Oloeducto Binacional Amerisur (“OBA”). This pipeline is operated by us and our affiliates and connects us to
the Ecuadorian pipeline system via RODA allowing us to sell our production FOB in Esmeraldas port in Ecuador. We hold
transport contracts with RODA and SOTE for the transport, storage and loading of our crude in Ecuador.

If  we  were  to  lose  any  of  our  customers,  the  loss  could  temporarily  delay  production  and  sale  of  our  oil  in  the
corresponding block. However, given the wide availability of customers for Colombian crude, we believe we could identify a
substitute customer to purchase the impacted production volumes in a very short period.

Ecuador

Ecuador  has  a  well-developed  crude  oil  market  with  broad  access  to  international  markets  and  an  extensive  pipeline
transportation system. Our oil production, which began in 2022, is transported through the Ecuadorian pipeline system, with
Esmeraldas as the delivery point, and 100% of our sales are exported on a competitive basis to industry leading participants
including  traders,  refineries,  and  other  producers. The  oil  price  is  linked  to  Brent  and  adjusted  by  a  differential  that  varies
month to month and resembles Oriente crude reference price.

Brazil

Our production in Brazil consists of natural gas, condensate and crude oil. Natural gas production is sold through a long-
term,  extendable  agreement  with  Petrobras,  which  provides  for  the  delivery  and  transportation  of  the  gas  produced  in  the
Manati  Field  to  the  EVF  gas  treatment  plant  in  the  State  of  Bahia. The  contract  is  in  effect  until  delivery  of  the  maximum
committed volume or June 2030, whichever occurs first. The contract allows for sales above the maximum committed volume
if mutually agreed by both seller and buyer. The price for the gas is fixed in reais and is adjusted annually in accordance with
the Brazilian inflation index. In July 2015, we signed an amendment to the existing gas sales agreement with Petrobras that
covers 100% of the remaining gas reserves in the Manati Field. The low gas prices seen in the Brazilian market during 2023
have represented a risk in the commercialization of gas from Manatí. The contractually agreed price considers inflation but is
not affected by market conditions, which reduces the appetite of the client, who has access to more favorable conditions.

The condensate produced in the Manati Field is subject to a condensate purchase agreement with Petrobras, pursuant to
which Petrobras has committed to purchase all of our condensate production in the Manati Field, but only in the amounts that
we produce, without any minimum or maximum deliverable commitment from us. Considering this prerogative, in February
2023, we signed an agreement with DAX Oil Refino S.A., a local private refinery, for the selling of condensate for a one-year
term, with the possibility of an extension for the same period. Through this agreement, we increased our portfolio of clients
and  improved  our  revenues.  Both  agreements  were  valid  through  December  31,  2023,  and  can  be  renewed  upon  an
amendment signed by the purchasers and the seller.

64

Table of Contents

Chile

Our customer base in Chile was limited in numbers and primarily consists of ENAP and Methanex. For the year ended
December 31, 2023, we sold 100% of our oil production in Chile to ENAP and 100% of our gas production to Methanex, with
sales to ENAP and Methanex accounting for 2% of our total revenues.

We had a long-lasting commercial relationship with ENAP and sold our crude to them for the past years. We had a sales
agreement with ENAP whereby ENAP had committed to purchase our oil production in the Fell Block in the amounts that we
produced, subject to the limitation of available storage capacity at the Gregorio Terminal. We delivered the oil we produced in
the Fell Block to ENAP at the Gregorio Terminal, where ENAP assumed responsibility for the oil transferred.

During  2023,  we  were  able  to  renegotiate  and  renew  the  sales  agreement  with  ENAP.  The  negotiation  process  was
developed from January to May, due to prolonged discussions on the fees related to mercury content. During the negotiation
timeframe, the contract for crude oil purchasing was suspended, affecting production of oil and gas in the Fell Block.

In March 2017, we executed a gas supply agreement with Methanex effective from May 1, 2017, to December 31, 2026.
Under  the  agreement,  Methanex  committed  to  purchase  up  to  400,000  SCM/d  of  gas  produced  by  us.  During  2022,  we
executed an amendment to increase the purchase commitment up to the total gas produced by GeoPark in Chile.

We gathered the gas we produced in several wells through our own flow lines and injected it into several gas pipelines
owned by ENAP. The transportation of the gas we sold to Methanex through these pipelines was pursuant to a private contract
between Methanex and ENAP. We did not own any natural gas pipelines for the transportation of natural gas.

Corporate

GeoPark  Limited,  our  holding  company  incorporated  under  the  laws  of  Bermuda,  has  entered  into  a  crude  purchase
agreement with an oil producer in the Putumayo Basin. The volumes purchased are transported and exported alongside our
Putumayo Basin production. Sales of this crude oil purchased from third parties accounted for 1% of our consolidated revenue
in 2023.

Significant Agreements

Colombia

E&P contracts

We have entered into E&P contracts granting us the right to explore and operate, as well as working interests in twenty
three blocks in Colombia. These E&P contracts are generally divided into two periods: (1) the exploration period, which may
be subdivided into various exploration phases and (2) the exploitation period, determined on a per-area basis and beginning on
the date we declare an area to be commercially viable. Commercial viability is determined upon the completion of a specified
evaluation program or as otherwise agreed by the parties to the relevant E&P contract. The exploitation period for an area may
be extended until such time as such area is no longer commercially viable and certain other conditions are met.

Pursuant to our E&P contracts, we are required, as are all oil and gas companies undertaking exploratory and production
activities in Colombia, to pay a royalty to the Colombian government based on our production of hydrocarbons, as of the time
a field begins to produce. Under Law 756 of 2002, as modified by Law 1530 of 2012, the royalties we must pay in connection
with  our  production  of  light  and  medium  oil  are  calculated  on  a  field-by-field  basis.  See  Note  33.1  to  our  Consolidated
Financial Statements.

Additionally, in the event that an exploitation area has produced amounts in excess of an aggregate amount established in
the E&P contract governing such area, the ANH is entitled to receive a “windfall profit”, to be paid periodically, calculated
pursuant to such E&P contract.

65

Table of Contents

In each of the exploration and exploitation periods, we are also obligated to pay the ANH a subsoil use fee. During the
exploration period, this fee is scaled depending on the contracted acreage. During the exploitation period, the fee is assessed
on the amount of hydrocarbons produced, multiplied by a specified dollar amount per barrel of oil produced or thousand cubic
feet of gas produced. Further, the ANH has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be,
exceed the prices set forth in the relevant E&P contract.

Our E&P contracts are generally subject to early termination for a breach by the parties, a default declaration, application
of any of the contract’s unilateral termination clauses, ANH regulation or termination clauses mandated by Colombian law.
Anticipated termination declared by the ANH results in the immediate enforcement of monetary guaranties against us and may
result  in  an  action  for  damages  by  the  ANH.  Pursuant  to  Colombian  law,  if  certain  conditions  are  met,  the  anticipated
termination  declared  by  the  ANH  may  also  result  in  a  restriction  on  the  ability  to  engage  contracts  with  the  Colombian
government  during  a  certain  period.  See  “Item  3.  Key  Information—D.  Risk  factors—Risks  relating  to  our  business—Our
contracts in obtaining rights to explore and develop oil and natural gas reserves are subject to contractual expiration dates and
operating conditions, and our CEOPs, E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements are subject to
early termination in certain circumstances.”

Eastern Llanos Basin:

Llanos  34  Block  E&P  contract.  On  March  13,  2009,  the  E&P  contract  was  awarded  to  Unión  Temporal  Llanos  34,
currently integrated by GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. with 45%, and Verano Limited with 55% working interest. The Llanos 34
Block E&P contract provides a 24-year exploitation period for each production area, beginning on the date of a commercial
declaration. The exploitation period may be extended for periods of up to 10 years at a time if certain conditions are met and
subject to ANH approval. As of the date of this annual report there are production areas for the Max, Túa, Tarotaro, Tigana,
Jacana, Chachalaca, Tilo, Chiricoca, Jacamar and Guaco fields.

Pursuant to the Llanos 34 Block E&P contract and applicable law, we are required to pay a royalty to the ANH based on
hydrocarbons produced in the Llanos 34 Block. Additionally, we are required to pay a subsoil use fee to the ANH. The ANH
also has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices set forth in the
Llanos  34  Block  E&P  contract.  The  ANH  also  has  an  additional  economic  right  equivalent  to  1%  of  production,  net  of
royalties. In accordance with the Llanos 34 Block E&P contract, when the accumulated production of each field, including the
royalties’ volume, exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, the Company should deliver to ANH a
share  of  the  production  net  of  royalties  in  accordance  with  an  established  formula.  See  Note  33.1  to  our  Consolidated
Financial Statements.

Llanos 32 Block. We have a 12.5% working interest in the Llanos 32 Block. Verano Energy is the operator of this block

and has an 87.5% working interest. Economic rights to the ANH are similar to those under the Llanos 34 Block.

Abanico  Block.  In  October  1996,  Ecopetrol  and  Explotaciones  CMS  Nomeco  Inc.  entered  into  the  Abanico  Block
association  contract.  Frontera  Energy  Colombia  Corp  is  the  operator  of,  and  has  a  100%  working  interest  in,  the Abanico
Block. We do not maintain a direct working interest in the Abanico Block, but rather have a 10% economic interest in the net
revenues  from  the  block  pursuant  to  a  joint  operating  agreement  initially  entered  into  with  Kappa  Resources  Colombia
Limited (now Frontera, who subsequently assigned its participation interest to Cepsa Colombia S.A., who then assigned the
interest to Explotaciones CMS Oil & Gas), Maral Finance Corporation and Getionar S.A.

Llanos 86, Llanos 87, Llanos 104, Llanos 123 and Llanos 124 Blocks. We and Hocol (a subsidiary of Ecopetrol), each
with  fifty  percent  (50%)  working  interest,  executed  E&P  contracts  over  these  blocks  in  2019,  as  a  result  of  the  Permanent
Competitive Process launched by ANH. We are the operator of these contracts that are in exploratory phase 1. In these E&P
contracts,  we  are  required  to  pay  subsurface  rights  to  the ANH,  calculated  based  on  the  total  acreage  of  the  blocks,  or  the
remaining area if in case of relinquishment had taken place. There is also an additional annual 25% markup of said subsurface
rights  payable  as  a  fee  for  institutional  development  and  technological  transfer.  Upon  production,  and  in  addition  to  legal
royalties, the ANH is entitled to receive a percentage of total production net of royalties, at the delivery point (multiplied by a
factor set in the contract and based on international oil prices). That percentage is 3% in the Llanos 87 E&P contract, 2% in
the Llanos 86 and Llanos 104 E&P contracts and 1% in the Llanos 123 and Llanos 124 E&P contracts. There is an additional
5-10% share payable to the ANH applicable upon extensions to the production period and

66

Table of Contents

when the accumulated gross aggregate production of the area of the contract exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a
defined price. ANH becomes entitled to an additional share on production in accordance with a formula set in the contract.

Llanos  94  Block.  On  July  24,  2019,  the  E&P  contract  was  awarded  to  Parex  Energy  as  a  result  of  the  Permanent
Competitive  Process  launched  by  ANH  in  2019.  We  acquired  a  50%  working  interest  from  Parex  and  obtained  ANH’s
approval to such transfer in May 2020. This contract is in an extended exploratory phase 1 and due to the extension of the
exploratory period approved in 2023, the current phase 1 commitments consist of drilling one exploratory well before October
1, 2025. We are not interested in drilling such prospect and have agreed to transfer our 50% working interest to our partner.
Accordingly, on December 28, 2023, Parex requested ANH approval for such transfer and, once approval is obtained, we will
no longer be liable for the capital commitment in the block.

In the Llanos 94 E&P contract, we are required to pay subsurface rights to the ANH, calculated based on the total acreage
of the blocks, or the remaining area if relinquishment had taken place. There is also an additional annual 25% markup of said
subsurface rights payable as a fee for institutional development and technological transfer. Upon production, and in addition to
legal royalties, the ANH is entitled to receive 2% of total production net of royalties, at the delivery point (multiplied by a
factor  set  in  the  contract  and  based  on  international  oil  prices).  There  is  an  additional  5-10%  share  payable  to  the  ANH
applicable upon extensions to the production period and when the accumulated gross aggregate production of the area of the
contract  exceeds  5  million  barrels  and  the  WTI  exceeds  a  defined  price. ANH  becomes  entitled  to  an  additional  share  on
production in accordance with a formula set in the contract.

CPO-5 Block E&P contract. On December 26, 2008, the E&P contract was executed between ONGC Videsh, as operator
and  the ANH  as  a  result  of  the  Competitive  Process  “Ronda  Colombia  2008”.  We  hold  a  30%  working  interest  since  the
acquisition of Amerisur. As of the date of this annual report, the contract is in phase 2 of the exploration period. There are two
commercial  fields  called  Mariposa  and  Indico,  and  we  also  had  successful  drilling  and  putting  into  production  exploration
wells in the fields called Flamenco, Halcon and Perico.

Pursuant  to  the  CPO-5  Block  E&P  contract  and  applicable  law,  we  are  required  to  pay  a  royalty  to  the ANH  based  on
hydrocarbons produced in the CPO-5 Block. Additionally, we are required to pay a subsoil use fee to the ANH. The ANH also
has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices set forth in the CPO-
5 Block E&P contract. The ANH also has an additional economic right equivalent to 23% of production, net of royalties. In
accordance  with  the  CPO-5  Block  E&P  contract,  when  the  accumulated  production  of  each  field,  including  the  royalties’
volume, exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, the Company should deliver to ANH a share of
the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

CPO-4-1 Block. On January 18, 2022, the E&P contract was executed between Parex Energy and the ANH as a result of
the Permanent Competitive Process launched by ANH in 2019. On April 29, 2022, an amendment to the E&P contract was
executed,  whereby  the ANH  approved  the  assignment  of  a  50%  non-operated  working  interest  to  us. As  of  the  date  of  this
annual report, this contract is in exploratory phase 1.

Pursuant  to  CPO-4-1  Block  E&P  contract  and  applicable  law,  we  are  required  to  pay  a  royalty  to  the ANH  based  on
hydrocarbons  produced  in  the  CPO-4-1  Block. Additionally,  we  are  required  to  pay  a  surface  and  subsoil  usage  fee  to  the
ANH.  We  are  required  to  comply  with  the  VEE  (economic  value  for  exclusivity)  equivalent  to  the  commitments  for  the
exploratory period; however, if we do not perform such commitments, the VEE amount calculated as provided in the CPO-4-1
E&P contract, must be paid to the ANH. The ANH also has an additional economic right equivalent to 1% of production, net
of  royalties.  In  accordance  with  the  CPO-4-1  Block  E&P  contract,  when  the  accumulated  production  of  the  area  of  the
contract,  including  the  royalties’  volume,  exceeds  5  million  barrels  and  the  WTI  exceeds  a  defined  base  price,  we  should
deliver to ANH a share of the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Putumayo Basin:

Coati Block E&P contract. We are the operator of and have a 100% working interest in the Coati Block. The Coati Block
has an evaluation area, declared in September 2006, by the former operator in the southern part of the Block for the Temblon
wells (Temblon Evaluation Program), which includes the completion and evaluation of the Coati-1 well. Pursuant to the Coati
Block E&P contract and applicable law, we are required to pay a royalty to the ANH based on hydrocarbons

67

Table of Contents

produced  in  the  block. Additionally,  we  are  required  to  pay  a  subsoil  use  fee  to  the ANH.  The ANH  also  has  the  right  to
receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices set forth in the Coati Block E&P
contract. In accordance with the Coati Block operation contract, when the accumulated production of each field, including the
royalties’ volume, exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, we should deliver to ANH a share of
the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Mecaya  Block  E&P  contract. We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  50%  working  interest  in  the  Mecaya  Block.  Sierracol
Energy is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest in the contract. As of the date of this annual report, the contract is
in unified phases 1 and 2 of the exploration period, and it is suspended due to Force Majeure Events (Prior Consultations).

Pursuant to the Mecaya Block E&P contract and applicable law, we are required to pay a royalty to the ANH based on
hydrocarbons produced in the Mecaya Block. Additionally, we are required to pay a subsoil use fee to the ANH. The ANH
also has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices set forth in the
Mecaya Block E&P contract. In accordance with the Mecaya Block operation contract, when the accumulated production of
each field, including the royalties’ volume, exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, the Company
should deliver to ANH a share of the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Platanillo  Block  E&P  contract.  We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  100%  working  interest  in  the  Platanillo  Block.  On
September 11, 2009, we began commercial exploitation. Pursuant to the Platanillo Block E&P contract and applicable law, we
are  required  to  pay  a  royalty  to  the  ANH  based  on  hydrocarbons  produced  in  the  Platanillo  Block.  Additionally,  we  are
required to pay a subsoil use fee to the ANH. The ANH also has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or
gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices set forth in the Platanillo Block E&P contract. In accordance with the Platanillo
Block operation contract, when the accumulated production of each field, including the royalties’ volume, exceeds 5 million
barrels  and  the  WTI  exceeds  a  defined  base  price,  the  Company  should  deliver  to ANH  a  share  of  the  production  net  of
royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Putumayo  8  Block  E&P  contract.  We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  50%  working  interest  in  the  Putumayo  8  Block.
Sierracol  Energy  is  the  owner  of  the  remaining  50%  working  interest.  The  contract  is  in  unified  phases  1  and  2  of  the
exploration period. Pursuant to the Putumayo 8 Block E&P contract and applicable law, we are required to pay a royalty to the
ANH based on hydrocarbons produced in the block. Additionally, we are required to pay a subsoil use fee to the ANH. The
ANH also has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices set forth in
the Putumayo 8 Block E&P contract. The ANH also has an additional economic right equivalent to 2% of production, net of
royalties.  In  accordance  with  the  Putumayo  8  Block  operation  contract,  when  the  accumulated  production  of  each  field,
including  the  royalties’  volume,  exceeds  5  million  barrels  and  the WTI  exceeds  a  defined  base  price,  the  Company  should
deliver to ANH a share of the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Putumayo  9  Block  E&P  contract.  We  are  the  operator  of  and  have  a  50%  working  interest  in  the  Putumayo  9  Block.
Sierracol Energy is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest. As of the date of this annual report, the contract is in
phase 1 of the exploration period, which is suspended since June 25, 2019, due to the occurrence of a Force Majeure event
(issuance of the Municipal Agreement which prohibits the execution of hydrocarbons exploration and production activities in
Puerto Guzmán Municipality). Pursuant to the Putumayo 9 Block E&P contract and applicable law, we are required to pay a
royalty to the ANH based on hydrocarbons produced in the block. Additionally, we are required to pay a subsoil use fee to the
ANH. The ANH also has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the case may be, exceed the prices
set  forth  in  the  Putumayo  9  Block  E&P  contract.  The  ANH  also  has  an  additional  economic  right  equivalent  to  18%  of
production, net of royalties. In accordance with the Putumayo 9 Block operation contract, when the accumulated production of
each field, including the royalties’ volume, exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, the Company
should deliver to ANH a share of the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Putumayo 14 Block E&P contract. We are the operator of and have a 100% working interest in the Putumayo 14 Block.

On March 10, 2022, we submitted to the ANH a request to withdraw from the PUT-14 E&P contract and transfer

68

Table of Contents

the pending commitments to the Platanillo and CPO-5 Blocks. Once total investment is reached through such transfers, ANH
will  proceed  with  the  contract’s  termination. As  of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  the  total  investment  needed  to  fulfill  the
commitments has already been incurred and the ANH approval is pending.

Putumayo 36 Block E&P contract. We are the operator of and have a 50% working interest in the Putumayo 36 Block.
Sierracol is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest. The contract is in preliminary phase, which is suspended since
April  1,  2020  due  to  the  occurrence  of  a  Force  Majeure  Event  (issuance  of  the  Municipal Agreement  which  prohibits  the
execution of hydrocarbons exploration and production activities in Puerto Guzmán Municipality). Pursuant to the Putumayo
36 Block E&P contract and applicable law, we are required to pay a royalty to the ANH based on hydrocarbons produced in
the  block.  Additionally,  we  are  required  to  pay  a  subsoil  use  fee  to  the  ANH.  The  ANH  also  has  the  right  to  receive  an
additional  fee  when  prices  for  oil  or  gas,  as  the  case  may  be,  exceed  the  prices  set  forth  in  the  Putumayo  36  Block  E&P
contract,  and  the  payment  of  25%  of  the  Economic  Right  for  the  use  of  the  subsoil  for  institutional  strengthening  and
Technology  Transfer.  The ANH  also  has  an  additional  economic  right  equivalent  to  1%  of  production,  net  of  royalties.  In
accordance  with  the  Putumayo  36  Block  operation  contract,  when  the  accumulated  production  of  each  field,  including  the
royalties’ volume, exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, the Company should deliver to ANH a
share of the production net of royalties in accordance with an established formula.

Tacacho and Terecay Blocks E&P contracts. We are the operator of and have a 50% working interest in the Tacacho and
Terecay Blocks. Sierracol Energy is the owner of the remaining 50% working interest in each E&P contract. The contracts are
in phase 1 of the exploration period, which are currently suspended due to the occurrence of force majeure events related with
social and public order conditions of the area. Pursuant to the Tacacho and Terecay Blocks E&P contracts and applicable law,
we are required to pay a royalty to the ANH based on hydrocarbons produced in the blocks. Additionally, we are required to
pay a subsoil use fee to the ANH. The ANH also has the right to receive an additional fee when prices for oil or gas, as the
case may be, exceed the prices set forth in the Tacacho and Terecay Blocks E&P contracts. In accordance with the Tacacho
and  Terecay  Blocks  operation  contracts,  when  the  accumulated  production  of  each  field,  including  the  royalties’  volume,
exceeds 5 million barrels and the WTI exceeds a defined base price, we should deliver to ANH a share of the production net of
royalties  in  accordance  with  an  established  formula.  On  September  21,  2022,  we  submitted  to  the  ANH  requests  for
termination  of  the  E&P  contracts  and,  in  January  2024,  we  submitted  additional  third-party  reports  as  supporting
documentation to such request. As of the date of this annual report, the requests are under review by the ANH.

Overriding Royalty Agreements

We are obligated to pay an overriding royalty of 4% and 2.5%, respectively, to the previous owners of the Llanos 34 and
CPO-5  Blocks,  based  on  the  production  and  sale  of  hydrocarbons  discovered  in  the  blocks.  During  2023,  the  Group  has
accrued  US$27.5  million  in  relation  to  these  overriding  royalty  agreements.  Furthermore,  there  are  overriding  royalty
agreements  in  place  from  1.2%  to  8.5%  of  the  net  production  in  the  Coati,  Mecaya,  PUT-8,  PUT-9,  Tacacho  and  Terecay
Blocks. Since they were exploratory blocks with no production during 2023, these agreements had no impact on our results.

Ecuador

Production sharing contracts

We entered into two production sharing contracts with the Ministry of Energy and Mines. While we are the operators in
the Espejo Block, Frontera operates the Perico Block. The production sharing contracts in Ecuador are generally divided into
two stages: (i) an exploration period of 4 years, which may be extended to 6 years; and (ii) a production period of 20 years.
The exploitation or production period commences upon Governmental approval of the exploitation and development plan of a
commercial field (although early production during the exploration period is allowed). The extension of the production period
requires  entering  into  an  amendment  to  the  contract  with  the  Government  of  Ecuador,  which  may  imply  revision  of
contractual conditions.

In the Espejo and Perico production sharing contracts, production is measured and distributed among the contractor and
the Government at the delivery point where a production sharing formula is applied based on international oil prices of the
Oriente marker in the previous month and the offer made as base point in each tender. No further royalties apply. In

69

Table of Contents

addition,  we  are  obliged  to  make  a  yearly  payment  of  US$24,000  as  compensation  for  the  use  of  water  and  natural
construction  materials,  which  increases  to  US$60,000  during  the  production  stage.  Furthermore,  there  is  an  institutional
development fee of US$100,000 payable every year.

Brazil

Overview of concession agreements

The Brazilian oil and gas industry is governed mainly by the Brazilian Petroleum Law, which provides for the granting of
concessions to operate petroleum and gas fields in Brazil, subject to oversight by the ANP. A concession agreement is divided
into  two  phases:  (1)  exploration  and  (2)  development  and  production.  The  exploration  phase  consists  of  one  exploratory
period that begins on the date of execution of the concession agreement, which can last from three to eight years (subject to
earlier  termination  upon  the  total  return  of  the  concession  area  or  the  declaration  of  commercial  viability  with  respect  to  a
given area), while the development and production phase, which begins for each field on the date a declaration of commercial
viability  is  submitted  to  the ANP,  can  last  up  to  27  years.  Upon  each  declaration  of  commercial  viability,  a  concessionaire
must submit to the ANP a development plan for the field within 180 days. The concessions may be renewed for an additional
period equal to their original term if renewal is requested with at least 12 months’ notice and provided that a default under the
concession agreement has not occurred and is then continuing. Even if obligations have been fulfilled under the concession
agreement and the renewal request was appropriately filed, renewal of the concession is subject to the discretion of the ANP.

The main terms and conditions of a concession agreement are set forth in Article 43 of the Brazilian Petroleum Law, and
include: (1) definition of the concession area; (2) validity and terms for exploration and production activities; (3) conditions
for  the  return  of  concession  areas;  (4)  guarantees  to  be  provided  by  the  concessionaire  to  ensure  compliance  with  the
concession agreement, including required investments during each phase; (5) penalties in the event of noncompliance with the
terms of the concession agreement; (6) procedures related to the assignment of the agreement; and (7) rules for the return and
vacancy of areas, including removal of equipment and facilities and the return of assets. Assignments of participation interests
in  a  concession  are  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  ANP,  and  the  replacement  of  a  performance  guarantee  is  treated  as  an
assignment.

The main rights of the concessionaires (including us in our concession agreements) are: (1) the exclusive right of drilling
and production in the concession area; (2) the ownership of the hydrocarbons produced; (3) the right to sell the hydrocarbons
produced; and (4) the right to export the hydrocarbons produced. However, a concession agreement set forth that, in the event
of a risk of a fuel supply shortage in Brazil, the concessionaire must fulfill the needs of the domestic market. In order to ensure
the domestic supply, the Brazilian Petroleum Law granted the ANP the power to control the export of oil, natural gas and oil
products.

Among the main obligations of the concessionaire are: (1) the assumption of costs and risks related to the exploration and
production  of  hydrocarbons,  including  responsibility  for  environmental  damages;  (2)  compliance  with  the  requirements
relating  to  acquisition  of  assets  and  services  from  domestic  suppliers;  (3)  compliance  with  the  requirements  relating  to
execution of the minimum exploration program proposed in the winning bid; (4) activities for the conservation of reservoirs;
(5) periodic reporting to the ANP; (6) payments for government participation; and (7) responsibility for the costs associated
with the deactivation and abandonment of the facilities in accordance with Brazilian law and best practices in the oil industry.

A concessionaire is required to pay to the Brazilian government the following: a license fee, rent for the occupation or

retention of areas, a special participation fee, royalties, and taxes.

Rental fees for the occupation and maintenance of the concession areas are payable annually. For purposes of calculating
these fees, the ANP takes into consideration factors such as the location and size of the relevant concession, the sedimentary
basin and the geological characteristics of the relevant concession.

A  special  participation  fee  is  an  extraordinary  charge  that  concessionaires  must  pay  in  the  event  of  obtaining  high

production volumes and/or profitability from oil fields, according to criteria established by applicable regulations, and is

70

Table of Contents

payable  on  a  quarterly  basis  for  each  field  from  the  date  on  which  extraordinary  production  occurs. This  participation  fee,
whenever due, varies between 0% and 40% of net revenues depending on (1) the volume of production and (2) whether the
concession is onshore or in shallow water or deep water. Under the Brazilian Petroleum Law and applicable regulations issued
by the ANP, the special participation fee is calculated based on the quarterly net revenues of each field, which consist of gross
revenues calculated using reference prices established by the ANP (reflecting international prices and the exchange rate for the
period) less royalties paid, investment in exploration, operational costs, and depreciation adjustments and applicable taxes.

The  Brazilian  Petroleum  Law  also  requires  that  the  concessionaire  of  onshore  fields  pay  to  the  landowners  a  special

participation fee that varies between 0.5% to 1.0% of the net operational income originated by the field production.

BCAM-40  Concession  Agreement.  On  August  6,  1998,  the  ANP  and  Petrobras  executed  the  concession  agreement
governing the BCAM-40 Concession, or the BCAM-40 Concession Agreement, following the first round of bidding, referred
to  as  Bid  Round  Zero,  under  the  regime  established  by  the  Brazilian  Petroleum  Law.  The  exploitation  phase  will  end  in
November 2029. On September 11, 2009, Petrobras announced the termination of BCAM-40 Concession’s exploration phase
and the return of the exploratory area of the concession to the ANP, except for the Manati Field.

Under  the  BCAM-40  Concession Agreement,  the ANP  is  entitled  to  a  monthly  royalty  payment  equal  to  7.5%  of  the
production  of  oil  and  natural  gas  in  the  concession  area.  In  addition,  in  case  the  special  participation  fee  of  10%  shall  be
applicable  for  a  field  in  any  quarter  of  the  calendar  year,  the  concessionaire  is  obliged  to  make  qualified  research  and
development investments equivalent to one percent of the field’s gross revenue. Area retention payments are also applicable
under  the  concession  agreement.  We  acquired  Rio  das  Contas’  10%  participation  interest  in  the  BCAM-40  Concession  on
March 31, 2014.

Rounds 11, 12, 13, 14 and 1st Open Acreage Bid Round Concession Agreements.

Under  the  Rounds  11,  12,  13,  14  and  1st  Open  Acreage  Bid  Round  Concession  Agreements,  the  ANP  is  entitled  to
a monthly royalty corresponding to up to 10% of the production of oil and natural gas in the concession area, in addition to the
special  participation  fee  described  above,  the  payment  for  the  occupation  of  the  concession  area  of  approximately  R$7,600
per  year  and  the  payment  to  the  owners  of  the  land  of  the  concession  equivalent  to  one  percent  of  the  oil  and  natural  gas
produced in the concession area.

During bidding, a work program offer is made in the form of work units and the ANP asks for a guarantee of a monetary
amount  proportional  to  the  offered  units.  However,  depending  on  the  work  performed  by  the  operator,  the  actual  work
program investment might have a different value to the guaranteed value.

Overview of consortium agreements

A consortium agreement is a standard document describing consortium members’ respective percentages of participation
and appointment of the operator. It generally provides for joint execution of oil and natural gas exploration, development and
production  activities  in  each  of  the  concession  areas. These  agreements  set  forth  the  allocation  of  expenses  for  each  of  the
parties  with  respect  to  their  respective  participation  interests  in  the  concession.  The  agreements  are  supplemented  by  joint
operating  agreements,  which  are  private  instruments  that  typically  regulate  the  aggregation  of  funds,  the  sharing  of  costs,
mitigation of operational risks, preemptive rights and the operator’s activities.

An important characteristic of the consortia for exploration and production of oil and natural gas that differs from other
consortia  (Article  278,  paragraph  1,  of  the  Brazilian  Corporate  Law)  is  the  joint  liability  among  consortium  members  as
established in the Brazilian Petroleum Law (Article 38, item II).

BCAM-40 Consortium Agreement

On  January  14,  2000,  Petrobras,  Queiroz  Galvão  Perfurações  (now  Enauta)  and  Petroserv  entered  into  a  consortium
agreement, or the BCAM-40 Consortium Agreement, for the performance of the BCAM-40 Concession Agreement. Petrobras
is the operator of the BCAM-40 concession, with a 35% participation interest. Enauta, Gas Bridge Storage S.A.

71

Table of Contents

and GeoPark Brazil have a 45%, 10% and 10% participation interest, respectively. The BCAM-40 Consortium Agreement has
a specified term of 40 years, terminating on January 14, 2040 and, at the time the obligations undertaken in the agreement are
fully completed, the parties will have the right to terminate it. The BCAM-40 Concession consortium has also entered into a
joint  operating  agreement,  which  sets  out  the  rights  and  obligations  of  the  parties  in  respect  of  the  operations  in  the
concession.

Petrobras Natural Gas Purchase Agreement

Enauta, GeoPark Brazil, Gas Bridge Storage S.A. and Petrobras are party to a natural gas purchase agreement providing
for the sale of natural gas by Enauta, GeoPark Brazil and Gas Bridge Storage S.A. to Petrobras, in an amount of 812 billion
cubic  feet  (“bcf”)  over  the  term  of  agreement.  The  Petrobras  Natural  Gas  Purchase Agreement  is  valid  until  the  earlier  of
Petrobras’  receipt  of  this  total  contractual  quantity  or  June  30,  2030. The  agreement  may  not  be  fully  or  partially  assigned
except upon execution of an assignment agreement with the written consent of the other parties, which consent may not be
unreasonably withheld provided that certain prerequisites have been met.

The agreement provides for the provision of “daily contractual quantities” to Petrobras peaking at 170.3 mmcfd in 2016
and  progressively  dropping  until  2030.  The  parties  may  agree  to  lower  volumes  as  dictated  by  Manati  Field’s  depletion.
Pursuant to the agreement, the base price is denominated in reais and is adjusted annually for inflation pursuant to the general
index of market prices (IGPM). Additionally, the gas price applicable on a given day is subject to reduction as a result of the
gas quantity acquired by Petrobras above the volume of the annual TOP commitment (85% of the daily contracted quantity) in
effect on such day. The Petrobras Natural Gas Purchase Agreement provides that all of the Manati Field’s daily production be
sold to Petrobras.

Chile

CEOPs

As  of  December  31,  2023,  we  had  four  CEOPs  in  effect  with  Chile,  one  for  each  of  the  blocks  in  which  we  operated,
which granted us the right to explore and exploit hydrocarbons in these blocks, determined our working interests in the blocks
and appointed the operator of the blocks. These CEOPs were divided into two phases: (1) an exploration phase, which was
divided  into  two  or  more  exploration  periods,  and  which  began  on  the  effectiveness  date  of  the  relevant  CEOP,  and  (2)  an
exploitation  phase,  which  was  determined  on  a  per-field  basis,  commencing  on  the  date  we  declared  a  field  to  be
commercially viable and ending with the term of the relevant CEOP. In order to transition from the exploration phase to an
exploitation phase, we had to declare a discovery of hydrocarbons to the Ministry of Energy. This was a unilateral declaration,
which granted us the right to test a field for a limited period of time for commercial viability. If the field proved commercially
viable, we would have to make a further unilateral declaration to the Ministry of Energy. In the exploration phase, we were
obligated to fulfill a minimum work commitment, which generally included the drilling of wells, the performance of 2D or 3D
seismic surveys, minimum capital commitments and guaranties or letters of credit, as set forth in the relevant CEOP. We also
had relinquishment obligations at the end of each period in the exploration phase in respect of those areas in which we had not
made a declaration of discovery. We were also able to voluntarily relinquish areas in which we had not declared discoveries of
hydrocarbons at any time, at no cost to us. In the exploitation phase, we generally did not face formal work commitments,
other  than  the  development  plans  we  filed  with  the  Chilean  Ministry  of  Energy  for  each  field  declared  to  be  commercially
viable.

Our  CEOPs  provided  us  with  the  right  to  receive  a  monthly  remuneration  from  Chile,  payable  in  petroleum  and  gas,
based either on the amount of petroleum and gas production per field or according to Recovery Factor, which considered the
ratio of hydrocarbon sales to total cost of production (capital expenditures plus operating expenses). Pursuant to Chilean law,
the rights contained in a CEOP could not be modified without consent of the parties.

Fell Block CEOP. On November 5, 2002, we acquired a percentage of rights and interests of the CEOP for the Fell Block
with Chile, or the Fell Block CEOP, and on May 10, 2006, we became the sole owners, with 100% of the rights and interest in
the Fell Block CEOP. The Fell Block CEOP provided us with a right to receive a monthly retribution from Chile payable in
petroleum and gas, based on the following per-field formula: 95% of the oil production sold in the field, for production sold of
up to 5,000 bopd, ring fenced by field, and 97% of gas production sold in the field, for production sold

72

Table of Contents

of up to 882.9 mmcfpd. If we exceeded these levels of production sold, our monthly retribution from Chile would decrease
based on a sliding scale set forth under the Fell Block CEOP to a maximum of 50% of the oil and 60% of the gas that we sold
per field.

TDF Blocks CEOPs. In 2012, we signed 3 CEOPs, together with ENAP, for the Isla Norte, Campanario and Flamenco
Blocks, all of them located in Tierra del Fuego (“TDF”), Magallanes region. Our working interest was 60% in Isla Norte and
50% in Campanario and Flamenco Blocks. The CEOPs had a term of 32 years, with an initial exploration phase which last for
up to 10 years, including a first exploration period of 3 years. The hydrocarbon discoveries opened up an exploitation phase
that lasts up to 25 years. We discovered hydrocarbon fields in the 3 blocks, starting in 2013 in the Flamenco Block, and in
2014 in both Campanario and Isla Norte Blocks. The CEOPs provided us with a right to receive a remuneration payable by
means of a fraction of the production sold, which in the TDF Blocks was based on a formula depending on the recovery of the
total  accumulated  expenses  incurred  (capital  expenditure  plus  operational  expenditure  plus  administrative  and  general
expenses). While the recovery factor was less than 1.0, the remuneration was 95% of the hydrocarbons sold, either oil or gas.
If  the  recovery  factor  surpassed  1.0,  a  formula  would  apply  reducing  gradually  the  remuneration  fraction  to  a  minimum  of
75% when the recovery factor was 2.5 times the total accumulated expenses.

Argentina

Overview of exploration permits

Our  exploration  permits  granted  us  and  our  partners  the  exclusive  right  to  explore  for  hydrocarbons  and  declare  a
commercial  discovery  within  the  acreage  of  our  permits.  Our  exploration  permits  were  made  up  of  three  subperiods,  each
lasting 3, 2 and 1 year(s), respectively, plus an extension period of up to 5 years.

We  were  bound  to  pursue  specific  minimum  work  or  investment  commitments  during  each  of  the  subperiods  of  each
exploration  permit.  Such  exploration  works  were  valued  in  work  units  assigned  to  each  particular  type  of  work  under  the
applicable bidding conditions.

Work and investment programs for the permits were required to be assured by issuing a performance bond for the value of

the committed work plan.

Under the terms of our exploration permits and concession agreements, we were entitled to our proportionate share of the
hydrocarbons  production  lifted  from  each  block.  We  paid  annual  surface  rental  fees  established  under  Hydrocarbons  Law
17,319  (“Hydrocarbons  Law”)  and  Resolution  588/98  of  the  Argentine  Secretariat  of  Energy  and  Decree  1454/2007,  and
certain landowner fees.

Our Argentine exploration permits had no change of control provisions, though any assignment of these concessions was
subject to the prior authorization by the executive branch of the Province of Mendoza and rights of first refusal in favor of our
partners  and  EMESA.  Each  of  these  permits  or  future  concessions  could  be  terminated  for  default  in  payment  obligations
and/or breach of material statutory or regulatory obligations. We were subject to the obligation to relinquish at least 50% of
the acreage of each exploration permit at the end of each exploration subperiod. We might also voluntarily relinquish acreage
to the provincial authorities.

Our Argentine  exploration  permits  were  governed  by  the  laws  of Argentina  and  the  resolution  of  any  disputes  must  be

sought in the Mendoza Provincial Courts.

If  and  when  we  made  a  commercial  discovery  in  one  or  more  of  our  exploration  permits,  we  would  have  the  right  to
request and obtain an exploitation concession to produce hydrocarbons in the block for 25 years, with an optional extension of
up  to  10  years. We  would  also  receive  the  right  to  be  granted  a  35-year  oil  transport  concession  to  build  and  make  use  of
pipelines or other transport facilities beyond the boundaries of the concession.

Additionally, oil and gas producers in Argentina must grant a privilege to the domestic market over the export market,

including hydrocarbon export restrictions, domestic price controls, export duties and domestic market supplier obligations.

73

Table of Contents

Title to properties

In each of the countries in which we operate, the state is the exclusive owner of all hydrocarbon resources located in such
country  and  has  full  authority  to  determine  the  rights,  royalties  or  compensation  to  be  paid  by  private  investors  for  the
exploration or production of any hydrocarbon reserves. In Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile and Argentina, local governments
grant  such  rights  through  E&P  contracts  or  contracts  of  association,  production  sharing  contracts,  concession  agreements,
CEOPs  and  exploitation  concessions,  respectively.  See  “Item  3.  Key  Information—D.  Risk  factors—Risks  relating  to  the
countries in which we operate— Oil and natural gas companies in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil operate and have a working
and/or  economic  interest  over,  yet  do  not  own  any  of  the  oil  and  natural  gas  reserves  in  such  countries.”  Other  than  as
specified in this annual report, we believe that we have satisfactory rights to exploit or benefit economically from the oil and
gas reserves in the blocks in which we have an interest in accordance with standards generally accepted in the international oil
and gas industry. Our E&P contracts, contracts of association, production sharing contracts, concession agreements, CEOPs
and exploitation concessions are subject to customary royalty and other interests, liens under operating agreements and other
burdens, restrictions and encumbrances customary in the oil and gas industry that we believe do not materially interfere with
the use of or affect the carrying value of our interests. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk factors—Risks relating to our
business—We are not, and may not be in the future, the sole owner or operator of all of our licensed areas and do not, and may
not in the future, hold all of the working interests in certain of our licensed areas. Therefore, we may not be able to control the
timing of exploration or development efforts, associated costs, or the rate of production of any non-operated and, to an extent,
any non-wholly owned, assets.”

Our customers

In  Colombia,  we  allocate  our  sales  on  a  competitive  basis  to  industry  leading  participants  including  traders  and  other
producers.  During  2023,  the  oil  and  gas  production  was  sold  to  three  clients  that  concentrated  96%  of  the  Colombian
subsidiaries’  revenue.  In  Ecuador,  100%  of  our  sales  were  exported  on  a  competitive  basis  to  industry  leading  participants
including traders and other producers. In Brazil, all our gas produced in Manati was sold to Petrobras. In Chile, our customers
were ENAP and Methanex. As of December 31, 2023, ENAP purchased all our Chilean oil and condensate production and
Methanex  purchased  all  our  natural  gas  production  in  Chile.  We  managed  the  counterparty  credit  risk  associated  to  sales
contracts  by  limiting  payment  terms  offered  to  minimize  the  exposure.  For  further  information,  please  see  Note  3  to  our
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality

Although  there  is  some  historical  seasonality  to  the  prices  that  we  receive  for  our  production,  the  impact  of  such
seasonality has not been material. Seasonality has also not played a significant role in our ability to conduct our operations,
including drilling and completion activities.

Our competition

The oil and gas industry is competitive, and we may encounter strong competition from other independent operators and
from  major  state-owned  oil  companies  in  acquiring  and  developing  licenses  in  the  countries  where  we  operate  or  plan  to
operate.

Many of these competitors have financial and technical resources and personnel substantially larger than ours. As a result,
our competitors may be able to pay more for desirable oil and natural gas assets, or to evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater
number  of  licenses  than  our  financial  or  personnel  resources  will  permit.  Furthermore,  these  companies  may  also  be  better
able  to  withstand  the  financial  pressures  of  unsuccessful  wells,  sustained  periods  of  volatility  in  financial  and  commodities
markets and generally adverse global and industry-wide economic conditions, and may be better able to absorb the burdens
resulting from changes in relevant laws and regulations, which may adversely affect our competitive position. See “Item 3.
Key Information—D. Risk factors—Risks relating to our business—Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense,
which makes it difficult for us to attract capital, acquire properties and prospects, market oil and natural gas and secure trained
personnel.”

74

Table of Contents

We  may  also  be  affected  by  competition  for  drilling  rigs  and  the  availability  of  related  equipment.  Higher  commodity
prices generally increase the demand for drilling rigs, supplies, services, equipment and crews, and can lead to shortages of,
and increasing costs for, drilling equipment, services and personnel. Shortages of, or increasing costs for, experienced drilling
crews and equipment and services could restrict our ability to drill wells and conduct our operations.

Health, safety and environmental matters

General

Our corporate HSE commitment governs our actions, in accordance with the legal framework, industry best practices and
international standards in terms of socio-environmental, health and safety performance. We work closely with our suppliers
and contractors to transfer the best HSE practices throughout our value chain and extend our responsibility towards safety and
the  environment,  with  binding  contractual  agreements,  monthly  safety  and  environmental  performance  evaluations,  annual
compliance evaluations and the construction of capacities and competencies necessary to be in line with our health, safety, and
environmental commitment.

We have a health and safety management plan focused on hazard identification and evaluation, including systematic tools

implemented in all the operations involving both employees’ and contractors’ activities.

We have an environmental management and feasibility strategy that allows us to guarantee the development of plans and

actions that ensure respect and protection of the environment in the territories where we operate.

In  each  of  the  countries  where  we  operate,  we  ensure  compliance  with  applicable  health,  safety  and  environmental
requirements. All our operations have the environmental licenses and permits required under the applicable legislation, which
are  derived  from  the  development  of  environmental  studies  with  citizen  participation  for  the  definition  of  management
measures and impact mitigation.

In  2023,  our  Health  and  Safety  Management  System  (HSMS)  was  certified  under  the  ISO  standard:  45001:2018,
including all Colombian operations. We also implemented our HSMS in our operations in other countries, such as Ecuador
and Chile, based on corporate commitment.

Our  Environmental  Management  System  (EMS),  certified  under  the  ISO  standard:  14001:2015  for  our  operations  in
Colombia, defines programs for the integral management of water resources; solid and liquid waste management; atmospheric
emissions  and  energy;  biodiversity  and  ecosystem  services  and  training  and  awareness  regarding  the  protection  of  the
environment for employees and suppliers. In addition, it defines the roles and responsibilities of management regarding to the
performance of our environmental issues.

Although  we  do  not  have  a  certified  EMS  in  countries  such  as  Ecuador  and  Chile,  we  have  implemented  the  main

programs contemplated by our corporate environmental commitment.

Our corporate environmental commitment is mainly based on the management of the following issues:

Integral water management

We  recognize  water  as  a  strategic  resource  and  axis  of  sustainable  development  in  the  territories.  For  this  reason,  we
implement  initiatives  and  strategies  for  saving  and  efficiently  using  the  resource,  and  we  focus  our  efforts  on  seeking
efficiencies  in  the  operation,  on  reusing  water  and  on  reducing  environmental  impacts  and  conflicts  associated  with  water
management.

We have an integral water management program that allows us to monitor the information needed to control its use and
consumption,  ensure  compliance  with  our  environmental  permits  and  take  the  necessary  measures  to  control  the  different
activities where we use water.

75

Table of Contents

All the waste waters generated in our operations is treated and disposed of in accordance with the environmental licenses.

In 2023, we did not use natural surface water sources in our permanent operations in the Llanos 34, Platanillo and Fell
Blocks and we did not carry out any type of wastewater discharge into surface waterbodies, to avoid any potential conflict
with  the  other  users  of  this  resource  due  to  its  quality  or  quantity.  We  are  committed  to  eliminate  any  natural  surface
waterbody withdrawal in all our permanent operations (fields under development) by 2025, as well as continuing to maintain
zero  (0)  direct  discharges  into  surface  water  sources.  We  are  making  advancements  to  define  the  corporate  water  footprint
under a recognized standard.

Biodiversity

Through  our  management,  we  articulate  our  efforts  to  avoid,  mitigate  and  eliminate  any  impact  that  may  represent  a
material risk to the biodiversity of the environment where we operate, applying the mitigation hierarchy to protect nature and
use  it  sustainably.  We  recognize  the  importance  of  biodiversity  in  the  areas  of  our  interest  since  the  planning  stage  of  our
projects. We are committed to avoiding operations in legally protected areas and taking into account biodiversity value and
ecosystem services as a driver to design, planning and execute our projects. Ecosystem services are the services that nature
provides to the people, such as fresh water, food, medicines, regulation of floods and soil erosion and carbon dioxide capture.

In addition, we compensate for our residual impact on biodiversity and, we participate and promote programs related to
the rehabilitation, restoration, and conservation of high value ecosystems through strategic alliances for the conservation of
biodiversity, strengthening social and cultural connections with nature, and promoting knowledge of the natural wealth of the
countries we operate in.

Some  of  the  projects  related  to  biodiversity  that  contribute  to  the  reduction  of  biodiversity  loss,  the  promotion  of

conservation of the environment and the stability of ecosystems during 2023, included:

●

The  donation  of  1,600  hectares  of  land  to  the  Manacacias  National  Park  to  be  declared  by  the  Colombian
government as part of the biodiversity offset measurements of our activities in Llanos 34 block.

● We  continue  being  part  of  the  Putumayo  Regional  Agreement  for  Biodiversity  and  Development,  which
integrates  efforts  by  the  private  sector  and  national  and  regional  entities  to  preserve  the  biodiversity  and
connectivity  of  this  region  of  the Amazon. As  part  of  this  agreement,  in  2023,  we  made  an  alliance  with  the
Sinch  Amazon  Institute  of  Scientific  Research,  Wildlife  Conservation  Society  -  WCS  and  other  Colombian
O&G  Company,  to  implement  the  project  call  “Ríos  diversos”  in  order  to  characterize  the  water’s  biological
quality in the Putumayo watershed and study its relationship with the local communities.

●

In Ecuador, in the canton of Shushufindi, province of Sucumbios, we developed, in coordination with the local
and provincial government, a project for the recovery of plant cover in areas of watercourses and estuaries with
an  ecosystem,  landscape  and  watershed  protection  approach,  in  order  to  improve  the  natural  balance  and  the
biodiversity of the territory.

● We actively participated in initiatives led by national and local governments in the countries where we operate
focused on reducing deforestation and promote the restauration of disturbed areas. In 2023, we contributed by
planting or donating more than 40,000 trees, as part of our environmental obligations and voluntary initiatives.

Climate change

Our  response  to  climate  change  and  our  contribution  to  achieve  the  sustainable  development  goal  number  13  of  the
United  Nations  is  part  of  our  plan  to  minimize  Greenhouse  Gas  (GHG)  emissions  announced  by  us  in  November  2021,
following approval of our board of directors:

76

Table of Contents

● 35-40% GHG emissions intensity reduction of Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2025;

● 40-60% GHG emissions intensity reduction of Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030; and

● net zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by or before 2050.

All our abovementioned goals are defined against a 2020 baseline.

These goals take into account the execution of some operational and environmental projects. The following projects are

the most relevant achieved during 2023 in Colombia:

● Both the interconnection of the core Llanos 34 Block to Colombia’s national grid and the dedicated 10MW solar

photovoltaic plant, although completed during 2022, showed their full impact during 2023; and

● the  construction  of  permanent  flare  systems  in  our  main  fields  in  Colombia  in  compliance  with  current

regulations.

Medium-term actions include energy efficiency, small-scale renewable projects, management of methane emissions, and

potential participation in carbon markets, among others.

Longer-term actions may include carbon capture, use and storage projects, reforestation and afforestation initiatives.

As of the date of this annual report, we have other ongoing environmental initiatives related to climate adaptation, such
as, in Colombia, we continue the execution of an agreement with the Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental
Studies (IDEAM) for the strengthening and modernization of the hydrometeorological monitoring network of the Orinoquía,
in  the  hydrographic  zone  of  the  Meta  River,  which  will  contribute  to  improve  water  management,  comprehensive  risk
management and climate change adaptation.

Integral waste management and circular economy

Regarding the proper management of solid waste generated by our activities, we focus our management on the principles
of reduce, reuse, recycle and recover. In this way we ensure the mitigation of environmental impacts, while complying with
applicable  regulations.  In  2023,  we  continue  strengthening  our  circular  economy  strategic  plan  and  the  roadmap  for  its
implementation. As  part  of  this  plan,  we  are  carrying  out  more  than  8  circular  initiatives  as  part  of  the  three  (3)  circularity
models that we have prioritized: 1. Water management. 2. Waste management. 3. Use of GHG.

Spill Management

In 2023, we had zero recordable hydrocarbon spills (>=1Bbl uncontained) in our operations.

Our HSE Plan

Our health, safety and environmental management plan is focused on undertaking realistic and practical programs based
on recognized world practices. Our emphasis is on building key principles and company-wide ownership and then expanding
programs  as  we  continue  growing.  Our  SPEED  philosophy  and  our  HSE  Plan  have  been  developed  with  reference  to  ISO
14001 for environmental management issues, ISO 45000 for occupational health and safety management issues, SA 8000 for
social  accountability  and  workers’  rights  issues  and  general  guidelines  from  international  entities  such  as  IOGP,  IPIECA,
IADC and ARPEL.

Our HSE Policy

Our policy seeks to meet or exceed safety and environmental regulations in the countries in which we operate. We believe

that oil and gas can be produced in an environmentally responsible manner with proper care, understanding and

77

Table of Contents

management,  while  safeguarding  the  well-being  of  all  people.  Within  our  SPEED  philosophy  we  have  a  team  that  is
exclusively focused on securing the environmental authorizations and permits for the projects we undertake and promoting the
best health and safety practices. This professional and trained team, specialized in environmental issues, is also responsible for
the achievement of the health, safety and environmental standards set by our board of directors and for training and supporting
our  personnel.  Our  senior  executives,  personnel  in  the  field,  visitors  and  contractors  have  also  received  training  in  proper
health, safety and environmental management.

Our health and safety practices and outcomes

We continue to improve and update management tools to strengthen our health and safety policy. We have implemented
world-class  programs  focused  on  analyzing,  assessing,  and  controlling  hazards  that  may  cause  injury  or  illness  to  our
employees,  contractors,  and  visitors.  Our  main  occupational  health  and  safety  programs  are:  the  proactive  observation
program  (POP),  the  authority  to  stop  an  activity  (ADA),  the  safety  operational  standard  (SOS),  the  incident  reporting  and
investigation (IRIS), the road transportation safety (RTS), and the business continuity master plan (PMCN).

In 2023, we reached several significant milestones, among which the following stand out:

● Our assets in Putumayo (Colombia) and Ecuador, which maintained a constant operation throughout 2023, had no

recordable people incidents.

● Record of hours worked, and kilometers travelled, 20% and 35% higher than 2022, respectively.

● Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) and recordable vehicular incidents rate (MVC) goals achieved.

● ISO 45001 certification.

As of December 31, 2023, and for the last twelve months, our HS indicators were the following:

● People injury. Indicators calculated per 1,000,000 hours worked (for both employees and contractors):

● Lost time injury rate (LTIR) of 0.48.

● Total recordable incident rate (TRIR) of 0.67.

● One fatal incident resulting from a vehicular accident involving one of our contractors.

● Vehicle incidents, calculated per 1,000,000 kilometers travelled:

● Recordable vehicular incidents rate (MVC) of 0.12.

The fatal incident reported above was the result of a vehicular accident in the Llanos 34 Block. Both the contractor and
the Company conducted internal investigations and determined the incident was accidental in nature. Furthermore, with the
intent  of  reinforcing  safety  in  our  operations,  we  carried  out  a  third-party  peer  review  of  our  risk  management  system  to
enhance our action plans in response to potential occurrence of similar events.

In 2023, we performed a third-party health and safety management system peer review, including more than 1,300 survey
participants, 25 interviews / focus groups and documents review. As a result, we plan to implement a workplan focused on
leadership, operative discipline, and contractor management.

Certain Bermuda law considerations

We have been designated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as a non-resident for Bermuda exchange control purposes.

This designation allows us to engage in transactions in currencies other than the Bermuda dollar, and there are

78

Table of Contents

no restrictions on our ability to transfer funds (other than funds denominated in Bermuda dollars) in and out of Bermuda or to
pay dividends to United States residents who are holders of our common shares.

Insurance

We maintain insurance coverage of types and amounts that we believe to be customary and reasonable for companies of
our size and with similar operations in the oil and gas industry. However, as is customary in the industry, we do not insure
fully against all risks associated with our business, either because such insurance is not available or because premium costs are
considered prohibitive.

Currently,  our  insurance  program  includes,  among  other  things,  construction,  fire,  vehicle,  technical,  umbrella  liability,
cyber security, director’s and officer’s liability and employer’s liability coverage. Our insurance includes various limits and
deductibles or retentions, which must be met prior to or in conjunction with recovery. A loss not fully covered by insurance
could  have  a  materially  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations.  See  “Item  3.  Key
Information—D. Risk factors—Risks relating to our business—Oil and gas operations contain a high degree of risk, and we
may not be fully insured against all risks we face in our business.”

Industry and regulatory framework

Colombia

Regulation of the oil and gas industry

The ANH is responsible for managing all exploration acreage not subject to previously existing association contracts with
Ecopetrol. Two decades ago, the ANH began offering all undeveloped and unlicensed exploration areas in the country under
concession-fashion  Exploration  and  Production  Contracts  (“E&P  contracts”)  and  Technical  Evaluation  Agreements,  (or
“TEAs”), which resulted in a significant increase in Colombian exploration activity and competition, according to the ANH.
The regime for ANH’s contracts is set forth in Agreement 008 of 2004 and Agreement 004 of 2012. The Agreement 004 of
2012  regulates  E&P  contracts  entered  into  from  May  4,  2012,  and  onwards.  E&P  contracts  signed  before  that  date  are  still
regulated by Agreement 008 of 2004. Due to the oil price crisis of 2015, the ANH implemented transitory measures through
Agreements 002, 003, 004 and 005 of 2015. On May 18, 2017, the ANH issued Agreement 002, which replaced Agreement
004  of  2012  and  transitory  measures  adopted  in  2014  and  2015.  Agreement  002  of  2017  established  rules  for  granting
hydrocarbon areas and adopted criteria for the exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons owned by Colombia, including
the  selection  of  contractors,  and  management,  execution,  termination,  liquidation,  monitoring,  control,  and  supervision  of
corresponding  contracts. Agreement  002  of  2017  (compiled  by Acuerdo  009  of  2021)  regulates  contracts  entered  into  from
May  18,  2017,  and  onwards.  E&P  contracts  entered  into  before  that  date  are  still  regulated  by  the  agreements  under  which
they were executed. Since 2004, the ANH has promoted several bidding processes resulting in various E&P contracts.

In 2020, and due to COVID-19 pandemic and the then-current oil low price scenario, the ANH issued Agreement 002 of
2020  with  transitory  relief  measures  such  as  term  extensions  for  the  exploratory  phases,  reduction  of  the  amounts  of  the
guarantees, among other measures. All these measures are subject to the accomplishment of certain conditions, some of which
are  related  to  the  average  oil  price  for  the  previous  months.  In  2021,  ANH  issued  Agreement  010  of  2021  to  enable  the
execution  of  pending  investments  in  any  free  area  on  the  map  of  available  areas  published  by ANH.  This  agreement  has
enabled  companies  with  E&P  contracts  with  pending  obligations  (investments)  to  execute  them  in  other  areas  promoting
exploration  activities  in  Colombia  whilst  helping  companies  comply  with  contractual  commitments.  In  2022, ANH  issued
Agreement 01, 2022 to regulate termination requests of E&P contracts under specific conditions such as being suspended for
at least 24 consecutive months. This agreement enables companies to request termination of E&P contracts which appear to be
inexecutable due to external factors out of a company’s control.

In  September  2023,  the  ANH  issued  Agreement  06,  2023,  with  the  purpose  of  promoting  exploration  by  granting
extensions of exploratory and evaluation periods and the possibility for contractors to maintain areas for a longer period of
time in exchange for additional exploratory commitments in the areas.

79

Table of Contents

Regulatory framework

Regulation of exploration and production activities

Pursuant to Colombian law, the state is the exclusive owner of all hydrocarbon resources located in Colombia and has full
authority to determine the rights, royalties or compensation to be paid by private investors for the exploration or production of
any hydrocarbon reserves. The Ministry of Mines and Energy is the authority responsible for creating national energy policy
and regulating all activities related to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons in Colombia.

Decree  Law  1056  of  1953  (Código  de  Petróleos),  or  the  Petroleum  Code,  establishes  the  general  procedures  and
requirements  that  must  be  completed  by  a  private  investor  and  disclosure  procedures  that  should  be  met  during  the
performance of these activities.

Exploration and production activities were governed by Decree 1895 of 1973 until September 2009. Decree Law 2310 of
1974 (as complemented by Decree 743 of 1975) governed the contracts and contracting processes carried out by Ecopetrol
and  the  rules  applicable  to  such  contracts  and  provided  that  Ecopetrol  was  responsible  for  administering  the  hydrocarbons
resources  in  the  Country.  Decree  2310  of  1974  was  replaced  by  Decree  Law  1760  of  2003,  which  restructured  the
hydrocarbons sector, but all agreements entered into by Ecopetrol prior to 2003 with other oil companies are still regulated by
Decree  2310  of  1974.  By  Decree  Law  1760  of  2003,  Ecopetrol  was  spun  off  and  the ANH  was  created.  One  of  the  main
purposes  of  this  decree  was  to  treat  Ecopetrol  as  another  oil  and  gas  company  in  the  market  and  to  transfer  regulatory
functions to the ANH as administrator of the nation’s hydrocarbons. This enabled Ecopetrol to differentiate its role and avoid
it being a party and judge to contractual matters.

Resolution  18-1495  of  2009,  modified  by  Resolution  40048  of  2015,  establishes  a  series  of  regulations  regarding
hydrocarbon  exploration  and  exploitation.  In  the  E&P  contracts,  operators  are  afforded  access  to  blocks  by  committing  to
perform  an  exploratory  work  program.  These  E&P  contracts  provide  companies  with  100%  of  new  production,  less  the
participation  of  the ANH,  which  participation  may  differ  for  each  E&P  contract  and  depends  on  the  percentage  that  each
company  has  offered  to  the  ANH  to  be  granted  with  a  block,  applicable  royalties  and  revenue  taxes.  In  addition,  the
Colombian government also introduced TEAs, in which companies that enter into TEAs are the only ones to have the right to
explore, evaluate and select desirable exploration areas by executing seismic and /or drilling stratigraphic wells and to propose
work  commitments  on  those  areas,  and  have  a  preemptive  right  to  enter  into  an  E&P  contract  (Right  to  convert  the  TEA
contract into an E&P contract), thereby providing companies with low-cost access to larger areas for preliminary evaluation
prior  to  committing  to  broader  exploration  programs.  Under  a  TEA,  the  contractor  commits  to  exclusively  perform  the
committed exploration activities.

Pursuant to Colombian law, oil companies are obliged to pay royalties (a percentage of their production) to the ANH in
kind  or  in  money  as  per  ANH’s  instruction  and  pursuant  to  the  E&P  contracts.  Companies  must  also  pay  the  ANH  an
economic right called participating interest in the production, commonly known as “X factor” among other economic rights
established in the E&P contracts (i.e. high price provision, technology transfer, use of the subsurface). Producing fields pay
royalties in accordance with the applicable law at the time of the discovery. Under the E&P contracts, ANH contractors also
undertake obligations in favor of the communities located in the area of influence of the oil & gas projects, called “Proyectos
en Beneficio de las Comunidades” or (PBC).

In  2022, ANH  launched  Ronda  Colombia  2021  with  an  addition  to  the  terms  of  reference  to  include  the  Exclusivity
Economic  Value  (EEV).  The  EEV  includes  both  the  minimum  amount  required  by  the  ANH  and  the  additional  amount
eventually included in the proposal, and which should be offered by the initial offers and counteroffers to surpass the initial
proposal and equalize or exceed the most favorable counteroffer presented in each round. EEV is represented in the number of
exploratory wells offered by a company to be drilled during the E&P contract’s exploratory phase of six years. The companies
should offer at least 1 EEV (minimum accepted by ANH) and grant a stand-by letter of credit for 100% of the estimated value
of the well as per ANH’s reference values. In the event the company does not comply with the offered EEV, the letter of credit
will be enforced by ANH. ANH granted 30 areas in Ronda Colombia 2021 in which we did not participate. However, Parex
transferred to us a 50% non-operated working interest in the CPO4-1 Exploration and Production Contract, which was granted
to it under Ronda Colombia 2021.

80

Table of Contents

Taxation

The Tax Statute and Law 9 of 1991 provide the primary features of the oil and gas industry’s tax and foreign exchange

system in Colombia. Generally, national taxes under the general tax statute apply to all taxpayers, regardless of industry.

The latest tax reform was enacted in December 2022, including modifications to the corporate income tax rate and the tax
treatment of royalties, in-kind and in cash. However, in November 2023, the Constitutional Court ruled that the modification
that prohibited the deduction of royalties is unconstitutional, and such deductions are allowed as was the case until 2022. See
Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The main taxes currently in effect are the income tax (35%, plus a surtax for companies developing crude oil extractive
activities from 2023 onwards, ranging between 0% and 15%, depending on the Brent oil price level), capital gains tax (15%),
sales or value added tax (19%), and the tax on financial transactions (0.4%).

  Additional  regional  taxes  also  apply  with  some  special  rules  for  the  companies  belonging  to  the  oil  and  gas  industry.
Colombia has entered into a number of international tax treaties to avoid double taxation and prevent tax evasion in matters of
income tax and net asset tax.

Decree 2080 of 2000 (amended by Decree 4800 of 2010), or the international investment regime, regulates foreign capital
investment  in  Colombia.  Resolution  1/2018  of  the  board  of  the  Colombian  Central  Bank,  or  the  Exchange  Statute,  and  its
amendments  contain  provisions  governing  exchange  operations.  Articles  94  to  97  of  Resolution  1  provide  for  a  special
exchange regime for the oil industry that removes the obligation of repayment to the foreign exchange market currency from
foreign currency sales made by foreign oil companies.

Such companies may not acquire foreign currency in the exchange market under any circumstances and must reinstate in
the foreign exchange market the capital required in order to meet expenses in Colombian legal currency. Companies can avoid
participating in this special oil and gas exchange regime, however, by informing the Colombian Central Bank and Ministry of
Mines and Energy, in which case they will be subject to the general exchange regime of Resolution 1 and may not be able to
access the special exchange regime for a period of 10 years.

Ecuador

Regulatory framework

Petroleum Ownership and Regulation

Oil,  gas,  minerals  and  natural  resources  underground  belong  to  the  Republic  of  Ecuador,  in  accordance  with  the
Ecuadorian Constitution. This is a primary concept in both the Constitu tion and the law. However, the State can allow private
invest ment to explore and produce hydrocarbons under different types of contracts as provided under the law.

The  Ministry  of  Energy  and  Non-Renewable  Natural  Resources  (“Ministry  of  Energy”)  regulates  and  oversees  all
hydrocarbon-re lated  activities  in  the  country,  including  exploration,  produc tion,  transportation,  refining  and  marketing. The
Ministry of Energy has absorbed the functions and duties of the Secretariat of Hydrocarbons and, through the Vice-Ministry of
Hydrocarbons,  oversees  awarding,  executing  and  monitoring  contracts  with  private  companies  for  the  explo ration  and
production  of  hydrocarbons.  On  the  other  hand,  the  Agency  for  Regulation  and  Control  of  Energy  and  Non-Renewable
Natural Resources (“ARCERNNR” for its Spanish acronym) has the legal duty to oversee, audit, collect levies and duties on
operations, and conduct accounting control of all upstream and downstream hydrocarbon operations.

The Ministry of the Environment, Water and Ecological Transition of Ecuador (“MAATE” for its Spanish acronym) has
the  legal  competence  for  granting  environmental  licenses  for  all  oil  and  gas  ac tivities  and  to  ensure  such  operations  are
conducted in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. The MAATE is independent from the Ministry of Energy.

81

Table of Contents

Petroleum Laws and Regulations

The Ecuadorian Constitution contains the main provisions, which stipulate that all hydrocarbons belong to the State of
Ecuador,  that  the  national  oil  company  is  EP  PETROECUADOR  has  preferential  rights  for  oil  ex ploration,  production,
transportation and sale, and that, in case a contract is executed with a private oil company, the State’s benefit must be more
than that of the private company. The State’s benefit is understood as all taxes, production shar ing and other economic benefits
the State receives from oil production, while the company’s benefit is understood as all proceeds received from payment for
the service of producing oil, or from the sales of its share of oil, less all amortization of investments, costs and taxes paid by
the company.

The Hydrocarbons Law is the main body of law below the Ecuadorian Constitution and regulates the different types of
contracts the government can enter into with international oil com panies, as well as the rights, obligations and penalties for
private  companies. The  main  contracts  that  have  been  imple mented  in  Ecuador  from  time  to  time  are  service  contracts  and
fairly recently the production-sharing contracts (“PSC”). Under a service contract, the State of Ecuador pays a contractually
agreed tariff per barrel. Under a PSC, the investing company receives a share of the oil produced which it can freely trade.

There are several regulations ranking below the Hydrocar bons Law that set further rules for all activities, including the

regulation of hydrocarbon operations and special local rules on the accounting principles for each type of contract.

In addition to all the other generally applicable laws of the country, the Environmental Law, Labor Law (including local

content in hiring of personnel) and Tax Law should be carefully considered.

Background for Contract types for Private Investment in Petroleum

During almost 50 years, Ecuador has been producing oil, through two types of contracts: production-sharing contracts and
service con tracts. Traditionally, the government has imposed service contracts when the price of oil was high and production-
sharing contracts when the price of oil was low. In 2010, a legal reform required all oil companies that were operating under
the umbrella of production-sharing contracts to transform their con tracts into service contracts.

Service  contracts  can  be  executed  by  the  Ministry  of  Hydrocarbons  for  exploration  blocks  or  for  fields  already  in
production  (followed  a  2021  reform  to  the  Law  of  Hydrocarbons).  In  both  cases,  the  con tracting  company  receives  a  pre-
agreed  tariff  that  is  usually  negotiated  considering  the  amount  of  the  investment,  exist ing  reserves,  production  cost  and  an
estimated reasonable profit for the company.

In  July  2018,  Executive  Decree  No.  449  reinstated  the  production-sharing  type  of  contracts  locally  referred  to  as
Participation  Contracts.  In  2019,  the  Ministry  of  Energy  executed  several  Participation  Contracts  for  exploration  and
exploitation of hydrocarbons.

The contract term for a production-sharing contract is usually four years for exploration, ex tendable  for two additional
years, and 20 years for produc tion, subject to an extension if reserves have been added and new investments are committed.
As of the date of this annual report, we hold two production-sharing contracts with a 50% working interest in consortium with
Frontera  Energy  (Espejo  Block,  operated,  and  non-operated  Perico  Block),  which  were  awarded  by  the  Ministry  of  Energy
during the First Intracampos Bidding Round in April 2019.

Taxation

The guiding principle is that the government’s share will always be higher than the contracting company’s share. If the

contracting company’s share is higher than 51%, it triggers a sovereignty margin adjustment in favor of the government.

Under a production-sharing contract, the government’s share is composed of the sales price or the reference price of the
share of oil assigned to the government as per the contract, plus all taxes and contributions paid by the company. In this type
of contract, the contracting company’s share is the higher of the sales price and the reference price of the

82

Table of Contents

company’s oil, less all amortization of investments, operating costs, trans portation costs up to the port of Balao on the Pacific
Coast and all taxes and contributions paid pursuant to the law and the contract.

Basically, the taxes are:

● employee profit-sharing (15 per cent of net profits before income tax);
● 25 per cent income tax rate;
● 12 per cent value-added tax;
● money outflow tax, applied to remittances abroad, except when it comes to distribution of profits, with the following
rates:  4%  until  January  31,  2023,  3.75%  from  February  1,  2023,  to  June  30,  2023,  3.5%  from  July  1,  2023,  to
December 30, 2023 and 2% from December 31, 2023 onwards;

● municipal taxes; and
● other fees and contributions charged by petroleum oversight authorities.

Production Risk

For  any  type  of  contract  to  be  entered  into  in  Ecuador,  the  investing  company  has  to  take  on  all  exploration  and  pro ‐
duction risks and investments, as well as environmental responsibilities in accordance with its corresponding envi ronmental
obligations.

Furthermore,  the  investing  company  must  strictly  abide  by  all  employment  laws,  in  terms  of  legal  requirements
concerning the maximum number of foreign employees. Some contracts have allowed for arbitration as a dispute resolution
mechanism; however, certain matters, such as taxes, cannot be submitted to arbitration. This is also true for certain termination
provisions in the event of the investing company breaching the law (such as transfer of rights without consent). The reform to
the Law of Hydrocarbons enacted in 2021 allows the entry into investment treaties with the Government of Ecuador, allowing
to freeze tax incentives in consideration for investment commitments and expanding local employment.

Brazil

Regulation of the oil and gas industry

Article  177  of  the  Brazilian  Federal  Constitution  of  1988  provides  for  the  Federal  Government’s  monopoly  over  the
prospecting and exploration of oil, natural gas resources and other fluid hydrocarbon deposits, as well as over the refining,
importation, exportation and sea or pipeline transportation of crude oil and natural gas. Initially, paragraph one of article 177
barred  the  assignment  or  concession  of  any  kind  of  involvement  in  the  exploration  of  oil  or  natural  gas  deposits  to  private
industry. On November 9, 1995, however, Constitutional Amendment Number 9 altered paragraph one of article 177 so as to
allow  private  or  state-owned  companies  to  engage  in  the  exploration  and  production  of  oil  and  natural  gas,  subject  to  the
conditions to be set forth by legislation.

Regulatory framework

Pricing policy

Until the enactment of the Brazilian Petroleum Law, the Brazilian government regulated all aspects of the pricing of oil
and oil products in Brazil, from the cost of oil imported for use in refineries to the price of refined oil products charged to the
consumer.  Under  the  rules  adopted  following  the  Brazilian  Petroleum  Law,  the  Brazilian  government  changed  its  price
regulation policies. Under these regulations, the Brazilian government: (1) introduced a new methodology for determining the
price of oil products designed to track prevailing international prices denominated in U.S. dollars, and (2) gradually eliminated
controls on wholesale prices.

83

Table of Contents

Concessions

In  addition  to  opening  the  Brazilian  oil  and  natural  gas  industry  to  private  investment,  the  Brazilian  Petroleum  Law
created new institutions, including the ANP, to regulate and control activities in the sector. As part of this mandate, the ANP is
responsible for licensing concession rights for the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas in Brazil’s
sedimentary  basins  through  a  transparent  and  competitive  bidding  process.  The ANP  has  conducted  17  bidding  rounds  for
exploration concessions from 1999 through 2021, four open acreage bid rounds, 6th Production Sharing Bidding Round and
two Transfer of Right Surplus Bidding Round.

Taxation

The  Brazilian  Petroleum  Law  introduced  significant  modifications  and  benefits  to  the  taxation  of  oil  and  natural  gas
activities.  The  main  component  of  petroleum  taxation  is  the  government  take,  comprised  of  license  fees,  fees  payable  in
connection  with  the  occupation  or  title  of  areas,  royalties  and  a  special  participation  fee.  The  introduction  of  the  Brazilian
Petroleum Law presents certain tax benefits primarily with respect to indirect taxes. Such indirect taxes are very complex and
can add significantly to project costs. Direct taxes are mainly corporate income tax and social contribution on net profit.

With the effectiveness of the Brazilian Petroleum Law and the regulations promulgated by the ANP, concessionaires are
required  to  pay  the  Brazilian  federal  government  the  following:  license  fees,  rent  for  the  occupation  or  retention  of  areas,
special participation fee, and royalties on production.

The minimum value of the license fees is established in the bidding rules for the concessions, and the amount is based on
the assessment of the potential, as conducted by the ANP. The license fees must be paid upon the execution of the concession
contract.  Additionally,  concessionaires  are  required  to  pay  a  rental  fee  to  landowners  varying  from  0.5%  to  1.0%  of  the
respective hydrocarbon production.

The  special  participation  fee  is  an  extraordinary  charge  that  concessionaires  must  pay  in  the  event  of  obtaining  high
production  volumes  and/or  profitability  from  oil  fields,  according  to  criteria  established  by  applicable  regulation,  and  is
payable  on  a  quarterly  basis  for  each  field  from  the  date  on  which  extraordinary  production  occurs. This  participation  rate,
whenever  due,  may  reach  up  to  40%  of  net  revenues  depending  on  (i)  volume  of  production  and  (ii)  whether  the  block  is
onshore, shallow water or deep water. Under the Brazilian Petroleum Law and applicable regulations issued by the ANP, the
special  participation  fee  is  calculated  based  upon  quarterly  net  revenues  of  each  field,  which  consist  of  gross  revenues
calculated using reference prices published by the ANP (reflecting international prices and the exchange rate for the period)
less: royalties paid; investment in exploration; operational costs; and depreciation adjustments and applicable taxes.

The ANP is responsible for determining monthly minimum prices for petroleum produced in concessions for purposes of
royalties  payable  with  respect  to  production.  Royalties  generally  correspond  to  a  percentage  ranging  between  5%  and  10%
applied  to  reference  prices  for  oil  or  natural  gas,  as  established  in  the  relevant  bidding  guidelines  (edital  de  licitação)  and
concession  agreement.  In  determining  the  percentage  of  royalties  applicable  to  a  particular  concession,  the ANP  takes  into
consideration, among other factors, the geological risks involved, and the production levels expected.

State VAT (ICMS)

ICMS is a state sales tax. This tax is due on the local sale of oil and gas, based on the sale price, including the ICMS

itself.

For intrastate transactions (carried out by a seller and a buyer located in the same Brazilian state) or imports, the ICMS
rate  is  determined  by  the  legislation  of  the  state  where  the  sale  is  made  and  generally  varies  from  17%  to  20%.  Interstate
transactions (carried out between a seller and buyer located in different Brazilian states), in turn, are subject to reduced rates of
4%  (if  the  products  are  imported  and  not  submitted  to  a  manufacturing  process  or,  in  case  of  further  manufacturing,  if  the
resulting product has a minimum imported content of 40%), 7% or 12%, depending on the states involved. One exception is
that,  due  to  the  immunity  established  by  the  Brazilian  Federal  Constitution,  ICMS  is  not  due  on  interstate  crude  oil
transactions when destined to industrialization and commercialization. On the other hand, in case of consumables

84

Table of Contents

or fixed assets, the buyer must pay to the state where the buyer is located, the ICMS DIFAL, which is calculated based on the
difference between the interstate rate and the buyer’s own internal ICMS rate.

ICMS is calculated under the noncumulative regime, and therefore some input transactions could result in tax credits (for

example the acquisition of inputs and fixed assets directly used in the company’s activity).

Social contribution taxes on gross revenue (PIS and COFINS)

PIS  and  COFINS  are  social  contribution  taxes  charged  on  gross  revenues  earned  by  a  Brazilian  Federal  Revenue

noncumulative regime of calculation.

Under the noncumulative regime, PIS and COFINS are generally charged at a combined nominal rate of 9.25% (1.65%
PIS and 7.6% COFINS) on national revenues earned by a legal entity. In that case, certain business costs result in tax credits to
offset  PIS  and  COFINS  liabilities  (e.g.,  input  and  services  acquisitions,  expenses  of  depreciation  and  amortization  of
machinery, equipment and other fixed assets acquired to be directly used in the company’s activities). PIS and COFINS paid
upon  the  importation  of  certain  inputs,  assets  and  services  contracted  that  are  destined  to  the  company’s  activity  are  also
creditable. Although upstream industries are generally subject to this regime, it is not clear yet when this benefit is applied
according to the stage of the field, (exploration or production).

Since July 1, 2015, taxpayers subject to the noncumulative regime must calculate PIS and COFINS over certain financial

revenues, applying rates of 0.65% and 4%, respectively.

Federal Industrialization VAT (IPI) and Municipality VAT (ISS)

IPI is a non-cumulative tax and may be due on goods acquisitions by importation or national transactions. The IPI rate
will be applied depending on the NCM classification of the product according to TIPI (Table of IPI). On the acquisition of
local  goods  subject  to  IPI,  such  tax  is  included  in  the  price  of  the  good.  Considering  that  O&G  activity  (upstream)  is  not
subject to IPI taxation, the amount of the tax cannot be considered as a credit (even though IPI is under the non-cumulative
regime  applicable  for  IPI’s  taxpayers),  which  means  that  this  will  be  a  cost  for  the  legal  entity  acquirer.  In  relation  to  the
importation, the importer of record will be considered as the taxpayer and will be obliged to pay the IPI due on the transaction.
For the same aforementioned reasons for the O&G companies (upstream), this will be considered as cost when the importation
is subject to IPI.

ISS is a cumulative tax which is due on provided services and imported services. Usually, regarding local transactions,
such  tax  is  included  in  the  price  of  the  service  charged  by  the  service  provider.  In  relation  to  the  import  of  service,  the
Brazilian entity contractor is responsible for the payment of the ISS, which means that, depending on contractual arrangement,
the tax burden may be supported by the Brazilian contractor or the foreign service provider.

ISS tax rate may vary from 2% to 5% and will depend on the nature of service, as well as where the service provider is

located (in general, some exceptions may apply).

Additionally,  in  2018,  GeoPark  Brazil  was  granted  a  tax  benefit  issued  by  SUDENE  (Northeastern  Development
Superintendence), by means of the Constitutive Act No. 0069/2018, which approved the tax incentive to reduce by 75% the
Income  Tax  and Additions,  calculated  over  the  company  exploration  profits,  based  on Article  1  of  the  Provisory  Measure
2,199-14 of August 24, 2001, in accordance with the requirements established by the Decree 6,539 of August 18, 2008.

The benefit will be valid for 10 years, starting from January 1, 2018, under the condition of modernizing the entire project
on the SUDENE operating area, observing all provided legal conditions and requirements that includes compliance with labor
and social law and with all environmental protection and control regulations, annual submission of a declaration of income
and a restriction to the distribution to partners or shareholders of the tax amount which is not paid due to the tax exemption.

85

Table of Contents

The  noncompliance  with  the  requirements  provided  constitutes  a  default  of  the  beneficiary  company  in  respect  to

SUDENE and shall be subject to the applicable penalties.

Chile

Regulation of the oil and gas industry

Under  article  24  of  the  Chilean  Constitution,  the  state  is  the  exclusive  owner  of  all  mineral  and  fossil  substances,
including hydrocarbons, regardless of who owns the land on which the reserves are located. The exploration and exploitation
of  hydrocarbons  may  be  carried  out  by  the  state,  companies  owned  by  the  state  or  private  entities  through  administrative
concessions  granted  by  the  President  of  Chile  by  Supreme  Decree  or  CEOPs  (administrative  contract  for  the  provision  of
oilfield services) executed by the Minister of Energy. Exploitation rights granted to private companies are subject to special
taxes and/or royalty payments. The hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation industry are supervised by the Chilean Ministry
of Energy.

In  Chile,  a  participant  is  granted  rights  to  explore  and  exploit  certain  assets  under  a  CEOP.  If  a  participant  breaches
certain obligations under a CEOP, the participant may lose the right to exploit certain areas or may be required to return all or
a portion of the awarded areas to Chile with no right of compensation. Although the government of Chile cannot unilaterally
modify  the  rights  granted  in  the  CEOP  once  it  is  signed,  exploration  and  exploitation  are  nonetheless  subject  to  significant
government regulations, such as regulations concerning the environment, tort liability, health and safety, and labor.

Regulatory framework

Regulation of exploration and production activities

Oil and gas exploration and development is governed by the Political Constitution of the Republic of Chile and Decree
with Law Force No 2 of 1986 of the Ministry of Mines, which set forth the revised text of the Decree Law 1089 of 1975, on
CEOPs.  However,  the  right  to  explore  and  develop  fields  is  granted  for  each  area  under  a  CEOP  between  Chile  and  the
relevant  contractors.  The  CEOP  establishes  the  legal  framework  for  hydrocarbon  activities,  including,  among  other  things,
minimum  investment  commitments,  exploration  and  exploitation  phase  durations,  compensation  for  the  private  company
(either  in  cash  or  in  kind)  and  the  applicable  tax  regime.  Accordingly,  all  the  provisions  governing  the  exploitation  and
development of our Chilean operations are contained in our CEOPs and the CEOPs constitute all the licenses that we need in
order  to  own,  operate,  import  and  export  any  of  the  equipment  used  in  our  business  and  to  conduct  our  gas  and  petroleum
operations in Chile.

Under  Chilean  law,  the  surface  landowners  have  no  property  rights  over  the  minerals  found  under  the  surface  of  their
land.  Subsurface  rights  do  not  generate  any  surface  rights,  except  the  right  to  impose  legal  easements  or  rights  of  way.
Easements or rights of way can be individually negotiated with individual surface landowners or can be granted without the
consent of the landowner through judicial process. Pursuant to the Chilean Code of Mines, a judge can permit a party to use an
easement pending final adjudication and settlement of compensation for the affected landowner.

Taxation

Under the Chilean tax regime, hydrocarbon exploitation benefits from the general income tax legislation are established at
the time of the execution of each CEOP for the exploitation of each block. Thus, new tax reforms do not affect the current
taxation for our subsidiaries in Chile.

Further,  transactions  between  foreign  related  parties  and  our  local  subsidiaries  are  compliant  with  several  tax  reporting
provisions  set  forth  by  the  Chilean  legislation  for  transfer  pricing  and  indirect  transfer  tax  purposes,  at  the  same  time  that
benefits derived from double taxation agreements entered into by Chile and the relevant countries are applied as well.

86

Table of Contents

Argentina

Regulatory framework

The Hydrocarbon Law No. 17,319 enacted in 1967 continues in force until today, subject to amendments introduced by
the  Laws  No.  24,145,  26,197  and  27,007.  A  bill  to  amend  the  Hydrocarbons  Law  17,319  was  presented  by  the  National
Executive Branch to the National Congress in December 2023 and continues under study as of March 2024.

The Hydrocarbon Law No. 17,319 provided for the existence of a state-owned oil & gas company (originally, YPF) for
whom private companies initially served as service contractors or joint venture partners. But it also provided for a concession
& royalty system which became the prevailing contractual granting instrument after the deregulation of petroleum activities
introduced by Decrees No. 1055/89, 1212/89 and 1589/89 (the “Petroleum Deregulation Decrees”) and the YPF Privatization
Law 24,145 enacted in 1992.

On  May  3,  2012,  the  Argentine  Congress  passed  the  Hydrocarbons  Sovereignty  Law  26,741  which  (i)  impaired  the
Deregulation  Decrees;  (ii)  declared  that  achieving  self-sufficiency  in  the  supply  of  hydrocarbons,  shall  be  a  national  public
interest  and  a  priority  for  Argentina;  and  (iii)  expropriated  51%  of  the  share  capital  of  YPF  then  owned  by  the  Spanish
company Repsol.

Domain and Jurisdiction of hydrocarbons resources

After  a  constitutional  reform  enacted  in  1994,  eminent  domain  over  hydrocarbon  resources  lying  in  the  territory  of  a
provincial state is now vested in such provincial state, while eminent domain over hydrocarbon resources lying offshore on the
continental  platform  beyond  the  jurisdiction  of  the  coastal  provincial  states  is  vested  in  the  federal  state. Thus,  oil  and  gas
exploration permits, and exploitation concessions are now granted by each provincial government.

Hydrocarbon Exports and Self-Sufficiency

Achieving self-sufficiency has been an energy policy goal from the early days of the industry. Supply privileges favoring
the  domestic  market  over  the  export  market,  including  hydrocarbon  export  restrictions,  domestic  price  controls,  price
subsidies, export duties and domestic market supply obligations have been implemented several times throughout Argentina´s
history.

Hydrocarbon Exploitation Concessions Terms

With regards to concessions, three types of exploitation concessions are provided: (i) 25-years conventional concessions;

(ii) 35-years unconventional hydrocarbon concessions and (iii) 30-years offshore concessions.

With  regards  to  royalties,  the  standard  royalty  rate  is  12%,  but  incremental  3%  rates  are  provided  to  apply  when  a
concession holder elects to renew an ongoing concession at the end of its term, subject to a cap of 18%. The payment of an
extension bonus to the government is also provided for a maximum amount equal to 2% of the remaining proven reserves at
the end of effective term of the concession valued at the average basin price applicable to the respective hydrocarbons during
the immediate past 2 years.

Regulation of transportation activities

Exploitation concessionaires have the exclusive right to obtain a transportation concession for the transport of oil and gas
from the provincial states or the federal government, depending on the applicable jurisdiction. Such transportation concessions
include  storage,  ports,  pipelines  and  other  fixed  facilities  necessary  for  the  transportation  of  oil,  gas  and  by-products.
Transportation  facilities  with  surplus  capacity  must  transport  third  parties’  hydrocarbons  on  an  open-access  basis,  for  a  fee
which is the same for all users on similar terms. As a result of the privatizations of YPF and Gas del Estado, a few common
carriers of crude oil and natural gas were chartered and continue to operate to date. Effective February 8, 2019, to promote
transportation capacity expansions, Decree 115/2019 allowed interested shippers to reserve transportation capacity in new or
expanded pipelines through freely negotiated capacity reservation agreements.

87

Table of Contents

Taxation

Exploitation concessionaires are subject to the general federal and provincial tax regime. The most relevant federal taxes
are  the  income  tax  (35%)  and  the  value-added  tax  (21%).  The  most  relevant  provincial  taxes  are  the  turnover  tax  (3%  on
average)  and  stamp  tax.  Corporate  income  tax  rate  may  range  from  25%  to  35%  on  bands  of  income  that  can  be  adjusted
annually.

Foreign Exchange Restrictions

Since  September  1,  2019,  wide  foreign  exchange  restrictions  were  re-established  in  Argentina.  Different  promotional
investment regimes (such as National Decree 929/2013 and National Decree 277/2022) were with a view to lessening such
restrictions  on  new  hydrocarbon  investments  projects.  But  foreign  exchange  restrictions  continue  to  limit  remittances  of
dividends, financial and commercial obligations with foreign creditors.

Environmental

Hydrocarbon operations are subject to concurrent national and provincial environmental statutes and regulations, and to
the concurrent jurisdiction of national and provincial environmental and hydrocarbon enforcement authorities. The different
hydrocarbon  producing  provincial  states  have  enacted  and  enforce  comprehensive  environmental  decommissioning,
restoration and remediation frameworks.

C.    Organizational structure

We are an exempted company incorporated pursuant to the laws of Bermuda. We operate and own our assets directly and
indirectly  through  a  number  of  subsidiaries.  See  an  illustration  of  our  corporate  structure  in  Note  21  (“Subsidiary
undertakings”) to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

D.    Property, plant and equipment

See “—B. Business Overview—Title to properties.”

ITEM 4A.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A.    Operating results

The  following  discussion  of  our  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  our

Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may
differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth
in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk factors” and “Forward-looking statements.”

Factors affecting our results of operations

We describe below the year-to-year comparisons of our historical results and the analysis of our financial condition. Our

future results could differ materially from our historical results due to a variety of factors, including the following:

88

Table of Contents

Discovery and exploitation of reserves

Our  results  of  operations  depend  on  our  level  of  success  in  finding,  acquiring  (including  through  bidding  rounds)  or
gaining  access  to  oil  and  natural  gas  reserves.  While  we  have  geological  reports  evaluating  certain  proved,  contingent  and
prospective resources in our blocks, there is no assurance that we will continue to be successful in the exploration, appraisal,
development and commercial production of oil and natural gas. The calculation of our geological and petrophysical estimates
is complex and imprecise, and it is possible that our future exploration will not result in additional discoveries, and, even if we
are  able  to  successfully  make  such  discoveries,  there  is  no  certainty  that  the  discoveries  will  be  commercially  viable  to
produce.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, we made total capital expenditures of US$199.0 million (US$178.1 million and

US$20.9 million in Colombia and Ecuador, respectively), consisting of US$73.2 million related to exploration.

Oil prices have been volatile, particularly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the armed conflict in Ukraine. In
preparation  for  continued  volatility,  we  have  developed  multiple  scenarios  for  our  2024  capital  expenditure  program.  See
“Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook.”

Funding for our capital expenditures relies in part on oil prices remaining close to our estimates or higher levels and other
factors  to  generate  sufficient  cash  flow.  Low  oil  prices  affect  our  revenues,  which  in  turn  affect  our  debt  capacity  and  the
covenants in our financing agreements, as well as the amount of cash we can borrow using our oil reserves as collateral, the
amount  of  cash  we  are  able  to  generate  from  current  operations  and  the  amount  of  cash  we  can  obtain  from  prepayment
agreements. If we are not able to generate the sales which, together with our current cash resources, are sufficient to fund our
capital program, we will not be able to efficiently execute our work program which would cause us to further decrease our
work program, which could harm our business outlook, investor confidence and our share price.

If oil prices average higher than the base budget price, we have the ability to allocate additional capital to more projects

and increase our work and investment program and thereby further increase oil and gas production.

Our results of operations will be adversely affected in the event that our estimated oil and natural gas asset base does not
result in additional reserves that may eventually be commercially developed. In addition, there can be no assurance that we
will  acquire  new  exploration  blocks  or  gain  access  to  exploration  blocks  that  contain  reserves.  Unless  we  succeed  in
exploration  and  development  activities,  or  acquire  properties  that  contain  new  reserves,  our  anticipated  reserves  will
continually  decrease,  which  would  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  results  of  operations  and  financial
condition.

Oil and gas revenue and international prices

Our revenues are derived from the sale of our oil and natural gas production, as well as of condensate derived from the
production  of  natural  gas. The  price  realized  for  the  oil  we  produce  is  generally  linked  to  Brent. The  price  realized  for  the
natural  gas  we  produced  in  Chile  was  linked  to  the  international  price  of  methanol,  which  is  settled  in  the  international
markets  in  US$.  The  market  price  of  these  commodities  is  subject  to  significant  fluctuation  and  has  historically  fluctuated
widely in response to relatively minor changes in the global supply and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty,
economic  conditions,  and  a  variety  of  additional  factors.  For  example,  during  the  four-year  period  from  March  1,  2020,  to
February 29, 2024, Brent spot prices ranged from a low of US$19.3 per barrel to a high of US$128.0 per barrel.

We  seek  to  partially  mitigate  our  exposure  to  crude  oil  price  volatility  using  derivatives  by  hedging  a  portion  of  our
production  for  a  limited  period  going  forward.  We  use  a  combination  of  options  to  manage  our  production’s  exposure  to
commodity  price  risk,  which  considers  forecasted  production  and  budget  price  levels,  among  other  factors.  For  further
information related to Commodity Risk Management Contracts, please see Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additionally, the oil and gas we sell may be subject to certain discounts. For example, in Colombia, the realized oil price
is  linked  to  either  the  Vasconia  crude  reference  price,  a  marker  broadly  used  in  the  Llanos  Basin,  or  the  Oriente  crude
reference price, a marker broadly used for crude sales in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, for the crude oil of the Putumayo Basin

89

Table of Contents

that  is  transported  through  Ecuador.  In  both  basins,  the  reference  price  is  then  adjusted  for  certain  marketing  and  quality
discounts based on, among other things, API, viscosity, sulphur content, delivery point and transport costs.

In Ecuador, the oil price is linked to Brent and adjusted by a differential that varies month to month and resembles the

Oriente crude reference price.

In Brazil, prices for gas produced in the Manati Field are based on a long-term off-take contract with Petrobras. The price
of gas sold under this contract is denominated in reais and is adjusted annually for inflation pursuant to the Brazilian General
Market Price Index (Índice Geral de Preços—Mercado) (the “IGPM”).

In Chile, the price of oil we sold to ENAP was based on Dated Brent minus certain marketing and quality discounts such
as, API, sulphur content and others. We had a long-term gas supply contract with Methanex. The price of the gas sold under
this  contract  was  determined  by  a  formula  that  considered  a  basket  of  international  methanol  prices,  including  US  and
European price indices.

If oil and gas prices had fallen by 10% compared to actual prices during the year, with all other variables held constant,
considering  the  impact  of  the  derivative  contracts  in  place,  post-tax  profit  for  the  year  would  have  been  lower  by  US$42.4
million (US$47.3 million in 2022).

Production and operating costs

Our production and operating costs consist primarily of expenses associated with the production of oil and gas, the most
significant of which are facilities and wells maintenance (including pulling works), labor costs, contractor and consultant fees,
chemical  analysis,  royalties,  economic  rights,  and  consumables,  among  others.  Our  production  costs  may  vary  as  a
consequence of the increase or decrease of commodity prices and other factors, such as the increase in energy costs occurred
in  2023  due  to  a  drought  that  affected  the  energy  matrix  in  Colombia  as  a  result  of  decreased  availability  of  hydroelectric
power. We have historically not hedged our costs to protect against fluctuations.

Availability and reliability of infrastructure

Our business depends on the availability and reliability of operating and transportation infrastructure in the areas in which
we operate. Prices and availability for equipment and infrastructure, and the maintenance thereof, affect our ability to make
the investments necessary to operate our business, and thus our results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 3. Key
Information—D. Risk factors—Risks relating to our business—Our inability to access needed equipment and infrastructure in
a timely manner may hinder our access to oil and natural gas markets and generate significant incremental costs or delays in
our oil and natural gas production.”

Production levels

Our oil and gas production levels are heavily influenced by our drilling results, our acquisitions and oil and natural gas

prices.

We  expect  that  fluctuations  in  our  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  will  be  driven  by  the  rate  at  which
production volumes from our wells decline. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted, oil and gas production from a given
well  will  decline  over  time.  See  “Item  3.  Key  Information—D.  Risk  factors—Risks  relating  to  our  business—Unless  we
replace our oil and natural gas reserves, our reserves and production will decline over time. Our business is dependent on our
continued  successful  identification  of  productive  fields  and  prospects  and  the  identified  locations  in  which  we  drill  in  the
future may not yield oil or natural gas in commercial quantities.”

Contractual obligations

In  order  to  protect  our  exploration  and  production  rights  in  our  licensed  areas,  we  must  make  and  declare  discoveries
within certain time periods specified in our various special contracts, E&P contracts and concession agreements. The costs to
maintain or operate our licensed areas may fluctuate or increase significantly, and we may not be able to meet our

90

Table of Contents

commitments under these agreements on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which may force us to forfeit our interests in
such areas. If we do not succeed in renewing these agreements, or in securing new ones, our ability to grow our business may
be materially impaired. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk factors—Risks relating to our business—Under the terms of
some of our various E&P contracts, production sharing agreements and concession agreements, we are obligated to drill wells,
declare any discoveries and file periodic reports in order to retain our rights and establish development areas. Failure to meet
these obligations may result in the loss of our interests in the undeveloped parts of our blocks or concession areas.”

Acquisitions

As described above, part of our strategy is to acquire and consolidate assets in Latin America. We intend to continue to
selectively  acquire  companies,  producing  properties  and  concessions.  As  with  our  historical  acquisitions,  any  future
acquisitions  could  make  year-to-year  comparisons  of  our  results  of  operations  difficult. We  may  also  incur  additional  debt,
issue equity securities or use other funding sources to fund future acquisitions. We generally incorporate our acquired business
into our results of operations at or around the date of closing.

On  January  16,  2020,  we  acquired  the  100%  share  capital  of  Amerisur.  Considering  that  Amerisur  issued  financial
information  monthly,  we  considered  the  identified  assets  and  liabilities  as  of  December  31,  2019.  If  the  purchase  price
allocation exercise had been carried out as of January 16, 2020, it would not have deferred significantly.

Functional and presentational currency

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in US$, which is our presentation currency. Items included in the
financial information of each of our entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which
the  entity  operates,  or  the  functional  currency,  which  is  the  US$  in  each  case,  except  for  our  Brazil  operations,  where  the
functional currency is the real.

Geographical segment reporting

In  the  description  of  our  results  of  operations  that  follow,  our  “Other”  operations  reflect  our  non-Colombian,  non-
Ecuadorian,  non-Brazilian,  non-Chilean  and  non-Argentine  operations,  primarily  consisting  of  our  corporate  head  office
operations.

As of December 31, 2023, we divided our business into five geographical segments—Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile
and Argentina—that corresponded to our principal jurisdictions of operation. Activities not falling into these five geographical
segments  are  reported  under  a  separate  corporate  segment  that  primarily  includes  certain  corporate  administrative  costs  not
attributable to another segment.

Description of principal line items

The following is a brief description of the principal line items of our consolidated statement of income.

Revenue

Revenue includes the sale of crude oil, condensate and natural gas net of value-added tax (“VAT”), and discounts related
to  the  sale  (such  as API  and  mercury  adjustments)  and  overriding  royalties  due  to  the  ex-owners  of  oil  and  gas  properties
where the royalty arrangements represent a retained working interest in the property. Revenue from the sale of crude oil and
gas is recognized when control of the product is transferred to the customer, which is generally when the product is physically
transferred  into  a  pipe  or  other  delivery  mechanism  and  the  customer  accepts  the  product.  Consequently,  the  Group’s
performance obligations are considered to relate only to the sale of crude oil and gas, with each barrel of crude oil equivalent
considered to be a separate performance obligation under the contractual arrangements in place.

91

Table of Contents

Commodity risk management contracts

Includes realized and unrealized gains and losses arising from commodity risk management contracts.

The derivatives that hedge cash flows from the sales of crude oil for periods through December 31, 2022, were accounted
for  as  non-hedge  derivatives  and  therefore  all  changes  in  the  fair  values  of  these  derivative  contracts  were  recognized
immediately as gains or losses in the results of the periods in which they occur as part of the Commodity risk management
contracts line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The  derivatives  that  hedge  cash  flows  from  the  sales  of  crude  oil  for  periods  from  January  1,  2023,  and  onwards  are
designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of changes in the fair values of these derivative contracts are
recognized  in  Other  Reserves  within  Equity.  The  gain  or  loss  relating  to  the  ineffective  portion,  if  any,  is  recognized
immediately as gains or losses in the results of the periods in which they occur. The amount accumulated in Other Reserves is
reclassified to profit or loss as a reclassification adjustment in the same period or periods during which the hedged cash flows
affect profit or loss as part of the Revenue line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Production and operating costs

Production and operating costs are recognized on the accrual basis of accounting. These costs include wages and salaries
incurred to achieve the revenue for the year. Direct and indirect costs of raw materials and consumables, rentals, royalties and
economic rights in cash are also included within this account. For a description of our production and operating costs, see “—
Factors affecting our results of operations.”

Depreciation

Capitalized costs of proved oil and natural gas properties are depreciated on a licensed-area-by-licensed-area basis, using
the  unit  of  production  method,  based  on  commercial  proved  and  probable  reserves  as  calculated  under  the  Petroleum
Resources Management System methodology promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the World Petroleum
Council (the “PRMS”), which differs from SEC reporting guidelines pursuant to which certain information in the forepart of
this  annual  report  is  presented. The  calculation  of  the  “unit  of  production”  depreciation  takes  into  account  estimated  future
discovery and development costs. Changes in reserves and cost estimates are recognized prospectively. Reserves are converted
to equivalent units on the basis of approximate relative energy content.

Geological and geophysical expenses

Geological and geophysical expenses are recognized on the accrual basis of accounting and consist of geosciences costs,
including  wages  and  salaries  and  share-based  compensation  not  subject  to  capitalization,  geological  consultancy  costs  and
costs relating to independent reservoir engineer studies.

Administrative expenses

Administrative expenses are recognized on the accrual basis of accounting and consist of corporate costs such as director
fees and travel expenses, new project evaluations and back-office expenses principally comprised of wages and salaries, share-
based compensation, consultant fees and other administrative costs, including certain costs relating to acquisitions.

Our administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023, decreased by US$6.1 million, or 12%, compared to
the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  mainly  due  to  higher  overhead  related  to  joint  operations,  and  a  one-time  share-based
payment made to the Group´s former CEO in 2022, as part of his transition agreement described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees – B. Compensation – CEO Transition Agreement.”

92

Table of Contents

Selling expenses

Selling expenses are recognized on the accrual basis of accounting and consist primarily of transportation, storage costs

and selling taxes.

Our selling expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023, increased by US$5.1 million, or 64%, compared to the year
ended  December  31,  2022,  mainly  due  to  deliveries  at  different  sales  points  in  the  CPO-5  Block  in  Colombia.  Sales  at  the
wellhead incur no selling costs but yield lower revenue, while transportation expenses for sales to alternative delivery points
are recognized as selling expenses.

Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts

Upon  completion  of  the  evaluation  phase,  the  exploratory  prospects  are  either  transferred  to  oil  and  gas  properties  or
charged to expense in the period in which the determination is made, depending on whether they have discovered reserves or
not. If not developed, exploration and evaluation assets are written off after three years, unless it can be clearly demonstrated
that the carrying value of the investment is recoverable.

During 2023, we recognized write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts of US$29.6 million (US$25.8 million in 2022).

See Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impairment of non-financial assets

Assets that are not subject to depreciation and/or amortization are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject
to depreciation and/or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount.

The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value minus costs to sell and value in use.

During 2023, we recognized a net impairment loss of US$13.3 million in the Fell Block due to the known selling price of
the related net assets in the context of the divestment transaction of the Chilean business. See Note 36.1 in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. During 2022, no impairment losses were recognized or reversed.

Financial results

Financial  results  include  interest  expenses,  interest  income,  bank  charges,  the  amortization  of  financial  assets  and

liabilities, and foreign exchange gains and losses.

Recent accounting pronouncements

See Note 2.1.1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Results of operations

The  following  discussion  is  of  certain  financial  and  operating  data  for  the  periods  indicated.  You  should  read  this

discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes.

In preparation for continued volatility, we have developed multiple scenarios for our 2024 capital expenditure program.

See “Item 4. Information on the Company –B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook.”

93

Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2023, compared to year ended December 31, 2022

The following table summarizes certain of our financial and operating data for the years ended December 31, 2023 and

2022.

For the year ended December 31, 

% Change from  
prior year
(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

2023

2022

Revenue
Sale of crude oil
Sale of purchased crude oil
Sale of gas
Commodity risk management contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Revenue
Commodity risk management contracts
Production and operating costs
Geological and geophysical expenses
Administrative expenses
Selling expenses
Depreciation
Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
Impairment loss recognized for non-financial assets
Other (expenses) income
Operating profit
Financial expenses
Financial income
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year

Net production volumes

Oil (mbbl)(2)
Gas (mcf)(3)
Total net production (mboe)
Average net production (boepd)

Average realized sales price

Oil (US$ per bbl)
Gas (US$ per mmcf)

Average unit costs per boe (US$)

Operating cost
Royalties and economic rights in cash
Production costs(1)
Geological and geophysical expenses
Administrative expenses
Selling expenses

 726,947
 5,464
 25,024
 (810)
 756,625
 —
 (232,325)
 (11,192)
 (43,969)
 (13,084)
 (120,934)
 (29,563)
 (13,332)
 (21,319)
 270,907
 (45,815)
 6,237
 (16,820)
 214,509
 (103,441)
 111,068

 12,395
 5,705
 13,345
 36,563

 67.0
 4.6

 12.5
 7.2
 19.6
 0.9
 3.7
 1.1

 1,004,775
 9,454
 35,350
 —
 1,049,579
 (70,221)
 (359,779)
 (10,529)
 (50,024)
 (7,995)
 (96,692)
 (25,789)
 —
 527
 429,077
 (57,073)
 3,180
 19,725
 394,909
 (170,474)
 224,435

 12,786
 7,864
 14,096
 38,620

 82.2
 4.8

 8.0
 18.8
 26.8
 0.8
 3.7
 0.6

 (28)%
 (42)%
 (29)%
 100 %
 (28)%
 (100)%
 (35)%
 6 %
 (12)%
 64 %
 25 %
 15 %
 100 %
 (4,145)%
 (37)%
 (20)%
 96 %
 (185)%
 (46)%
 (39)%
 (51)%

 (3)%
 (27)%
 (5)%
 (5)%

 (18)%
 (4)%

 57 %
 (62)%
 (27)%
 21 %
 (0)%
 86 %

(1) Calculated pursuant to FASB ASC 932.
(2) We present production figures before deduction of royalties, economic rights and government’s production share, as we
believe that net production before royalties, economic rights and government’s production share is more appropriate in
light of our foreign operations and the attendant royalty, economic rights and government’s production share regimes. Oil
production figures presented on page F-70 are net of royalties, economic rights and government’s production share.
(3) Corresponds to production measured after separation but prior to compression, which is the measure we used to monitor

business performance. Gas production presented on page F-71 is gas measured at the point of delivery.

94

 
   
   
   
 
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain financial data.

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Argentina     Other     Total

    Colombia     Ecuador    Brazil     Chile     Argentina     Other     Total

(in thousands of US$)

2023

2022

For the year ended December 31, 

 702,401
 (101,666)

 19,097
 (7,096)

 14,019
 (2,332)

 15,644
 (9,815)

 —  5,464  
 (3) 
 (22)

 756,625  
 (120,934) 

 978,423
 (78,775)

 10,671
 (788)

 19,873
 (2,796)

 29,196
 (14,076)

 1,962
 (254)

 9,454  
 (3) 

 1,049,579
 (96,692)

 (29,563)

 —

 —  (13,332)

 —

 —  

 (42,895) 

 (21,318)

 (4,471)

 —

 —

 —

 —  

 (25,789)

Revenue
Depreciation
Impairment and
write-off

Revenue

For the year ended December 31, 2023, crude oil sales were our principal source of revenue, with 96%, 1% and 3% of our
total revenue from crude oil, purchased crude oil and gas sales, respectively. The following chart shows the change in oil and
natural gas sales from the year ended December 31, 2022, to the year ended December 31, 2023.

Consolidated
Sale of crude oil
Sale of purchased crude oil
Sale of gas
Commodity risk management contracts designated as cash flow hedges
Total

By country
Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Other
Total

For the year ended
December 31, 

2023
2022
(in thousands of US$)

 726,947
 5,464
 25,024
 (810)
 756,625

 1,004,775
 9,454
 35,350
 —
 1,049,579

Year ended December 31, 

2023

2022

Change from prior year  
%  

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

 702,401
 19,097
 14,019
 15,644
 —
 5,464
 756,625

 978,423
 10,671
 19,873
 29,196
 1,962
 9,454
 1,049,579

 (276,022)
 8,426
 (5,854)
 (13,552)
 (1,962)
 (3,990)
 (292,954)

 (28)%
 79 %
 (29)%
 (46)%
 (100)%
 (42)%
 (28)%

Revenue  decreased  28%,  from  US$1,049.6  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  to  US$756.6  million  for
the year ended December 31, 2023, as a result of lower realized prices and lower deliveries. Sales of crude oil decreased due
to  lower  realized  prices  and  lower  sold  volumes  of  10.9  mmbbl  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  compared  to  12.2
mmbbl  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  and  resulted  in  net  revenue  of  US$726.9  million  for  the  year  ended
December  31,  2023,  compared  to  US$1,004.8  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  In  addition,  sales  of  gas
decreased  from  US$35.4  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  to  US$25.0  million  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2023, due to lower natural gas deliveries and lower realized prices.

The decrease in 2023 net revenue of US$293.0 million is mainly explained by:

● a decrease of US$276.0 million in Colombia, due to lower realized prices and lower deliveries;

● an increase of US$8.4 million in Ecuador, mainly due to higher deliveries partially offset by lower realized oil prices;

95

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

● a  decrease  of  US$5.9  million  in  Brazil,  mainly  due  to  lower  gas  deliveries,  partially  offset  by  higher  realized  gas

prices;

● a decrease of US$13.6 million in Chile, due to lower realized prices and lower deliveries;

● a  decrease  of  US$2.0  million  in Argentina  due  to  the  divestment  of  the Aguada  Baguales,  Puesto Touquet  and  El

Porvenir Blocks on January 31, 2022; and

● a decrease of US$4.0 million due to lower trading operation performed by the holding company, GeoPark Limited.

Revenue  attributable  to  our  operations  in  Colombia  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  was  US$702.4  million,
compared  to  US$978.4  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  representing  92.8%  and  93.2%  of  our  total
consolidated sales, respectively. The decrease is related to a decrease in the average realized price per barrel of crude oil from
US$82.7 per barrel to US$66.9 per barrel, primarily due to lower reference international prices, in addition to a decrease in oil
deliveries from 11.8 mmbbl to 10.5 mmbbl.

Revenue attributable to our operations in Ecuador for the year ended December 31, 2023, was US$19.1 million, a 79%
increase from US$10.7 for the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was mainly due to higher oil deliveries from 0.12
mmboe for the year ended December 31, 2022, to 0.27 mmboe for the year ended December 31, 2023, principally as a result
of  the  successful  drilling  campaign  in  the  Perico  Block  during  the  year,  partially  offset  by  lower  realized  oil  prices  from
US$89.9  per  boe  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  to  US$69.9  per  boe  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023. The
contribution to our revenue from our operations in Ecuador during the year ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, was 2.5%
and 1.0%, respectively.

Revenue  attributable  to  our  operations  in  Brazil  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  was  US$14.0  million,  a  29%
decrease  from  US$19.9  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  principally  due  to  lower  gas  deliveries  from  0.5
mmboe for the year ended December 31, 2022, to 0.3 mmboe for the year ended December 31, 2023, to respond to the lower
gas  demand  in  Brazil,  partially  offset  by  higher  realized  gas  prices  from  US$38.3  per  boe  for  the  year  ended
December  31,  2022,  to  US$39.0  per  boe  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023. The  contribution  to  our  revenue  from  our
operations in Brazil during the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, was 1.9%, in both years.

Revenue attributable to our operations in Chile for the year ended December 31, 2023, was US$15.6 million, compared to
US$29.2  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  principally  due  to  (1)  a  decrease  in  oil  sales  by  US$9.4  million
reflecting lower average realized prices per barrel of crude oil from US$94.7 per barrel for the year ended December 31, 2022,
to US$68.0 per barrel for the year ended December 31, 2023, and a decrease in oil deliveries from 0.15 mmbbl to 0.07 mmbbl,
and, (2) a decrease in gas sales by US$4.1 million reflecting lower deliveries and lower average realized prices from US$22.7
per boe for the year ended December 31, 2022, to US$20.5 per boe for the year ended December 31, 2023. The contribution to
our  revenue  during  the  years  ended  December  31,  2023,  and  2022,  from  our  operations  in  Chile  was  2.1%  and  2.8%,
respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, no revenue was generated from our operations in Argentina due to the divestment
of the Aguada Baguales, Puesto Touquet and El Porvenir Blocks on January 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022,
revenue was US$2.0 million which contributed in a 0.2% to our revenue.

Revenue attributable to our trading operation performed by the holding company, GeoPark Limited, for the year ended
December  31,  2023,  was  US$5.5  million,  compared  to  US$9.5  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  The
contribution to our revenue from our trading operation during the year ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, was 0.7% and
0.9%, respectively.

96

Table of Contents

Production and operating costs

The following table summarizes our production and operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

For the year ended December 31, 

% Change

2023

2022

    from prior year

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

Consolidated (including Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile and Other)
Royalties in cash
Economic rights in cash
Staff costs and share-based payments
Well and facilities maintenance
Operation and maintenance
Consumables
Equipment rental
Transportation costs
Field camp
Safety and insurance costs
Personnel transportation
Consultant fees
Gas plant costs
Non-operated blocks costs
Crude oil stock variation
Purchased crude oil
Other costs
Total

 (12,845)
 (72,032)
 (14,639)
 (26,089)
 (8,143)
 (37,556)
 (4,314)
 (5,850)
 (6,546)
 (5,487)
 (3,363)
 (2,291)
 (1,865)
 (20,421)
 (2,004)
 (4,666)
 (4,214)
 (232,325)

2023

Year ended December 31, 

 (80)%
 (62)%
 4 %
 26 %
 24 %
 72 %
 (43)%
 45 %
 61 %
 47 %
 36 %
 7 %
 11 %
 61 %
 (131)%
 (41)%
 (6)%
 (35)%

 (63,298)
 (188,989)
 (14,069)
 (20,779)
 (6,545)
 (21,789)
 (7,580)
 (4,021)
 (4,070)
 (3,745)
 (2,480)
 (2,133)
 (1,680)
 (12,650)
 6,449
 (7,929)
 (4,471)
 (359,779)

2022

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Other     Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil     Chile     Argentina     Other

(in thousands of US$)

By country
Royalties in cash
Economic rights in cash
Staff costs and share-based
payments
Well and facilities maintenance
Operation and maintenance
Consumables
Equipment rental
Transportation costs
Field camp
Safety and insurance costs
Personnel transportation
Consultant fees
Gas plant costs
Non-operated blocks costs
Crude oil stock variation
Purchased crude oil
Other costs
Total

 (11,201)
 (72,032)

 (12,006)
 (23,280)
 (8,143)
 (36,078)
 (3,461)
 (5,145)
 (5,761)
 (5,075)
 (3,211)
 (2,241)
 (131)
 (12,168)
 (1,012)
 —
 (3,301)
 (204,246)

 —  (1,096)
 —
 —

 (548)
 —

 —  (60,314)
 —  (188,989)

 —  (1,546)
 —
 —

 (1,165)
 —

 (273)
 —

 —
 —

 (2,601)
 (2)
 (30)
 (1,368)
 (1,439)
 (2)
 —
 —
 —
 —  (1,357)
 (121)
 (15)
 —
 (838)
 (632)
 —
 (73)
 (776)
 —
 (9)
 (184)
 (183)
 (45)
 (107)
 —
 (45)
 —
 (42)
 (8)
 —
 —  (1,734)
 —
 (108)
 (101)
 —
 —
 (376)
 (4,946)

 —  (10,647)
 —  (13,670)
 —
 (6,240)
 —  (19,727)
 (7,372)
 —
 (3,163)
 —
 (3,239)
 —
 (3,321)
 —
 (2,334)
 —
 (2,067)
 —
 —
 —
 (6,618)
 —
 3,652
 —
 —  (4,666)
 —
 (3,577)
 —
 (327,626)
 (4,666)

 (537)
 (8,226)

 (8,145)
 (891)
 —
 —
 (10,241)

 (3,180)
 (5)
 (38)
 (5,029)
 (1,732)
 (191)
 —
 —
 —
 —  (1,917)
 (16)
 —
 —
 (148)
 (848)
 —
 (3)
 (795)
 —
 —
 (195)
 (217)
 —
 (83)
 —
 (9)
 (51)
 —
 (3)
 (241)
 —  (1,375)
 (215)
 —
 (235)
 —
 —
 —
 (438)
 (206)
 (14,126)
 (5,299)

 (5,817)
 3,053
 —
 —
 (3,220)

 (199)
 —
 (157)
 —
 (305)
 —
 (129)
 —
 (60)
 —
 (7)
 —
 (36)
 —
 (12)
 —
 (54)
 —
 (12)
 —
 (64)
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (21)
 —  (7,929)
 —
 (7,929)

 (250)
 (1,579)

Consolidated  production  and  operating  costs  decreased  35%,  from  US$359.8  million  for 

the  year  ended
December 31, 2022, to US$232.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to a decrease in royalties and
economic rights paid in-cash, partially offset by an increase in consumables due to higher energy costs in Colombia and an
increase in non-operated block costs due to higher activities in the CPO-5 and Perico Blocks in Colombia and Ecuador.

97

   
   
Table of Contents

Production  and  operating  costs  in  Colombia  decreased  by  38%,  to  US$204.2  million  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2023, as compared to US$327.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to lower royalties
and economic rights which decreased by US$249.3 million, mainly due to a decrease in the mix of royalties and economic
rights  paid  “in-cash”  as  compared  to  royalties  and  economic  rights  paid  “in-kind”,  and  lower  international  prices,  partially
offset  by  an  increase  in  consumables  due  to  higher  energy  costs  in  the  Llanos  34  Block  due  to  a  drought  that  affected  the
energy matrix in Colombia as a result of decreased availability of hydroelectric power and an increase in non-operated block
costs due to higher activities in the CPO-5 Block.

Production  and  operating  costs  in  Ecuador  were  US$10.2  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  compared  to
US$3.2  million  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  The  increase  was  mainly  the  result  of  higher  deliveries  that  increased
130% during 2023, compared to 2022, and higher activity in the Perico block.

Production and operating costs in Brazil decreased by 7%, to US$4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, mainly resulting from lower royalties due to a decrease in gas deliveries and
maintenance  activities  in  the  Manati  Block.  Operating  costs  per  boe  increased  to  US$10.9  per  boe  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2023, from US$7.4 per boe for the year ended December 31, 2022, due to lower gas deliveries during 2023.

Production  and  operating  costs  in  Chile  decreased  by  42%  to  US$8.2  million  due  to  lower  well  intervention  and
maintenance activities in the Fell Block. Operating costs per boe decreased to US$13.0 per boe in 2023 from US$16.1 per boe
in 2022.

Purchases  of  crude  oil  for  the  trading  operation  performed  by  the  holding  company,  GeoPark  Limited,  amounted  to

US$4.7 million and US$7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively.

No  production  and  operating  costs  were  recorded  in  Argentina  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  due  to  the

divestment of the Aguada Baguales, Puesto Touquet and El Porvenir Blocks on January 31, 2022.

Geological and geophysical expenses

Geological and geophysical expenses increased by 6%, from US$10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, to

US$11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as the result of higher exploratory activities.

Administrative costs

Administrative costs decreased by 12%, from US$50.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, to US$44.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as the result of higher overhead related to joint operations, and a one-time
share-based  payment  made  to  the  Group´s  former  CEO  in  2022  as  part  of  his  transition  agreement  described  in  “Item  6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees – B. Compensation – CEO Transition Agreement.”

Selling expenses

Colombia
Ecuador
Chile
Argentina
Total

Year ended December 31, 

Change from prior year

2023

%
(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

2022

 (10,976)
 (1,850)
 (258)
 —
 (13,084)

 (5,887)
 (1,676)
 (328)
 (104)
 (7,995)

 (5,089)
 (174)
 70
 104
 (5,089)

 86 %
 10 %
 (21)%
 (100)%
 64 %

Selling  expenses  increased  by  64%,  from  US$8.0  million  for  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  to  US$13.1  million  for
the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to deliveries at different sales points in the CPO-5 Block in Colombia. Sales
at the wellhead incur no selling costs but yield lower revenue, while transportation expenses for sales to alternative delivery
points are recognized as selling expenses.

98

   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Commodity risk management contracts

As from January 1, 2023, commodity risk management contracts are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, so that
realized gains or losses are recorded within Revenue while unrealized gain and losses are recorded in the Reserves line item
within Equity.

We  recorded  a  net  loss  of  US$70.2  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  composed  by  a  realized  and  an
unrealized portion. The realized loss of US$83.2 million reflected Brent oil prices above ceiling prices of the commodity risk
management  contracts  settled  during  the  period  and  the  unrealized  gain  of  US$13.0  million  reflected  the  reclassification  to
realized loss of the previously mentioned settled contracts.

Depreciation

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Other
Total

Year ended December 31, 

2023

2022

Change from prior year  
%  

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

 (101,666)
 (7,096)
 (2,332)
 (9,815)
 (22)
 (3)
 (120,934)

 (78,775)
 (788)
 (2,796)
 (14,076)
 (254)
 (3)
 (96,692)

 (22,891)
 (6,308)
 464
 4,261
 232
 —
 (24,242)

 29 %
 801 %
 (17)%
 (30)%
 (91)%
 — %
 25 %

Depreciation  charges  increased  by  25%  from  US$96.7  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  to  US$120.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to an increase in the depreciation cost per boe in Colombia as a
consequence  of  lower  proved  and  probable  reserves  at  the  end  of  2022  in  the  CPO-5  and  Llanos  34  Blocks,  and  higher
production sold in Ecuador, partially offset by lower production sold in Chile.

Operating profit

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Other
Total

Year ended December 31, 

2023

2022

Change from prior year  
%  

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

 321,512
 (1,912)
 4,514
 (21,878)
 (11,189)
 (20,140)
 270,907

 443,584
 (1,033)
 10,521
 (728)
 923
 (24,190)
 429,077

 (122,072)
 (879)
 (6,007)
 (21,150)
 (12,112)
 4,050
 (158,170)

 (28)%
 85 %
 (57)%
 2,905 %
 (1,312)%
 (17)%
 (37)%

We  recorded  an  operating  profit  of  US$270.9  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  compared  to  US$429.1

million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as a result of the reasons described above.

In  2023,  we  recorded  a  write-off  of  unsuccessful  exploration  efforts  of  US$29.6  million  that  corresponded  to  three
unsuccessful  exploratory  wells  drilled  in  the  Llanos  87  Block  (Colombia),  an  unsuccessful  exploratory  well  drilled  in  the
Llanos 124 Block (Colombia) and other exploration costs incurred in the Llanos 94, Coati and Llanos 124 Blocks (Colombia).

During 2023, we also recognized an impairment loss of US$13.3 million in the Fell Block due to the known selling price
of  the  related  net  assets  in  the  context  of  the  divestment  transaction  of  the  Chilean  business.  In  addition,  we  recorded
termination and other costs incurred from the divestment process in Chile, including a provision for investment commitments
maintained by GeoPark after the transaction, for a total amount of US$9.7 million, together with the amount

99

   
   
   
   
 
   
   
   
   
 
Table of Contents

paid for transferring the working interest in the Los Parlamentos Block in Argentina to the joint operation partner of US$7.0
million.

In 2022, we recorded a write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts of US$25.8 million that corresponded to exploration
costs incurred in previous years in the Tacacho and Terecay Blocks (Colombia), four exploratory wells drilled in the CPO-5,
Platanillo, Llanos 34 and Llanos 94 Blocks (Colombia), and certain exploration costs incurred in the Espejo Block (Ecuador).
No impairment losses were recognized during 2022.

Financial results

Net financial results decreased 27% to US$39.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to US$53.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2022, mainly resulting from the deleveraging process executed during 2021 and 2022
that resulted in significant debt reduction with extended maturities and lower costs of debt.

Foreign exchange (loss) gain

Foreign exchange difference was a loss of US$16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to a gain of
US$19.7  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  The  results  in  both  years  mainly  correspond  to  the  effect  of  the
fluctuation  of  the  local  currency  in  Colombia  on  the  liabilities  held  in  that  currency,  such  as  the  income  tax  payable,  the
provision  for  asset  retirement  obligation  and  other  environmental  liabilities,  and  the  lease  liabilities.  The  Colombian  Peso
revalued by 21% in 2023 and devalued by 21% in 2022.

Profit before income tax

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Other
Total

Year ended December 31, 

Change from prior year

2023

2022

%

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

 287,243
 (3,188)
 5,504
 (23,462)
 (6,933)
 (44,655)
 214,509

 460,561
 (1,469)
 11,119
 (2,491)
 (4,337)
 (68,474)
 394,909

 (173,318)
 (1,719)
 (5,615)
 (20,971)
 (2,596)
 23,819
 (180,400)

 (38)%
 117 %
 (50)%
 842 %
 60 %
 (35)%
 (46)%

For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded a profit before income tax of US$214.5 million, compared to a profit

of US$394.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to the reasons mentioned above.

Income tax expense

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Other
Total

Year ended December 31, 

Change from prior year

2023

2022

%

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

 (96,770)
 198
 (396)
 (3,878)
 (2,595)
 (103,441)

 (162,565)
 (780)
 (3,566)
 (525)
 (3,038)
 (170,474)

 65,795
 978
 3,170
 (3,353)
 443
 67,033

 (40)%
 (125)%
 (89)%
 639 %
 (15)%
 (39)%

Our effective tax rate was 48% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 43% in 2022. The increase in the
effective tax rate was primarily due to higher statutory income tax rate applicable to companies engaged in the extraction of
crude oil in Colombia, partially offset by the effect of the revaluation of the local currency in Colombia on the tax bases of
property, plant and equipment.

100

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

In 2023 and 2022, the statutory income tax rate in Colombia was 35%, though a tax surcharge is also applicable in 2023,
as  a  result  of  a  tax  reform  approved  in  November  2022,  impacting  companies  engaged  in  the  extraction  of  crude  oil  like
GeoPark. The tax surcharge varies from zero to 15%, depending on different Brent oil prices. The applicable surcharge for
2023 was 10%.

Profit for the year

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Other
Total

Year ended December 31, 

2023

2022

Change from prior year  
%  

(in thousands of US$, except for percentages)

 190,473
 (2,990)
 5,108
 (27,341)
 (6,933)
 (47,249)
 111,068

 297,996
 (2,249)
 7,553
 (3,016)
 (4,337)
 (71,512)
 224,435

 (107,523)
 (741)
 (2,445)
 (24,325)
 (2,596)
 24,263
 (113,367)

 (36)%
 33 %
 (32)%
 807 %
 60 %
 (34)%
 (51)%

For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded a net profit of US$111.1 million as a result of the reasons described

above, compared to a net profit of US$224.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Year ended December 31, 2022, compared to year ended December 31, 2021

For  a  discussion  of  the  results  of  our  operations  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  compared  to  the  year  ended
December  31,  2021,  please  refer  to  “Item  5.—A.  Operating  Results—Results  of  Operations  for  the  Year  Ended
December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2022.

B.    Liquidity and capital resources

Overview

Our financial condition and liquidity are and will continue to be influenced by a variety of factors, including:

● changes in oil and natural gas prices and our ability to generate cash flows from our operations;

● our capital expenditure requirements;

● the level of our outstanding indebtedness and the interest we have to pay on this indebtedness; and

● changes in exchange rates which will impact our generation of cash flows from operations when measured in US$.

We continually evaluate additional alternatives to further improve our capital structure by increasing our cash balances
and/or  reducing  or  refinancing  a  portion  of  our  indebtedness.  These  alternatives  include  various  strategic  initiatives  and
potential asset sales as well as potential public or private equity or debt financings. If additional funds are obtained by issuing
equity securities, our existing stockholders could be diluted. We can give no assurances that we will be able to sell any of our
assets or to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Our  principal  sources  of  liquidity  have  historically  been  contributed  shareholder  equity,  debt  financings  and  cash
generated by our operations. We have also in the past entered into offtake and prepayment agreements. For further information
on  our  funding  through  debt  and  equity  capital  markets,  see  “Item  4.  Information  on  the  Company—A.  History  and
Development of the Company—Funding.”

101

   
   
   
   
 
Table of Contents

We believe that our current operations and 2024 capital expenditures program can be funded from cash flow from existing
operations and cash on hand. Should our operating cash flow decline due to unforeseen events, including delivery restrictions
or a protracted downturn in oil and gas prices, we would examine measures such as capital expenditure program reductions,
oil  prepayment  agreements,  disposition  of  assets,  or  issuance  of  equity,  among  others.  We  believe  the  liquidity  and  capital
resource alternatives available to us will be adequate to fund our operations and provide flexibility until oil prices and industry
conditions  improve. This  includes  supporting  our  capital  expenditure  program,  payment  of  debt  services  and  dividends  and
any amount that may ultimately be paid in connection with commitments and contingencies. See “Item 4. Information on the
Company—B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook.”

Capital expenditures

In the past, we have funded our capital expenditures with proceeds from equity offerings, credit facilities, debt issuances
and pre-sale agreements, as well as through cash generated from our operations. We expect to incur substantial expenses and
capital expenditures as we develop our oil and natural gas prospects and acquire additional assets. See “Item 4. Information on
the Company –B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook”.

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  we  had  total  capital  expenditures  related  to  the  purchase  of  property,  plant  and

equipment of US$199.0 million (US$178.1 million and US$20.9 million in Colombia and Ecuador, respectively).

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  we  had  total  capital  expenditures  related  to  the  purchase  of  property,  plant  and
equipment  of  US$168.8  million  (US$139.2  million,  US$18.5  million,  US$11.1  million  and  US$0.1  million  in  Colombia,
Ecuador, Chile and Argentina, respectively).

Cash flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated:

Cash flows from (used in)
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash flows from operating activities

2023

Year ended December 31, 
2022
(in thousands of US$)

2021

 300,938
 (198,590)
 (98,721)
 3,627

 467,471
 (153,673)
 (286,552)
 27,246

 216,777
 (126,558)
 (190,442)
 (100,223)

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash flows from operating activities were US$300.9 million, a 36% decrease from
US$467.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, mainly resulting from the decrease in revenues reflecting lower oil
and gas prices in 2023.

For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  cash  flows  from  operating  activities  were  US$467.5  million,  a  116%  increase
from US$216.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly resulting from the increase in oil revenues reflecting
higher prices in 2022, partially offset by the loss on commodity risk management contracts.

Cash flows used in investing activities

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash flows used in investing activities were US$198.6 million, a 29% increase
from  US$153.7  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  This  variation  is  primarily  explained  by  an  increase  of
US$30.2 million in capital expenditures related to the purchase of property, plant and equipment.

102

   
   
   
Table of Contents

For the year ended December 31, 2022, cash flows used in investing activities were US$153.7 million, a 21% increase
from  US$126.6  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021.  This  variation  is  primarily  explained  by  an  increase  of
US$39.6 million in capital expenditures related to the purchase of property, plant and equipment.

Cash flows used in financing activities

Cash  flows  used  in  financing  activities  were  US$98.7  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  compared  to
US$286.6 million used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022. This variation was principally related to
the full redemption during 2022 of the Notes due 2024.

Cash  flows  used  in  financing  activities  were  US$286.6  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  compared  to
US$190.4 million used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021. This variation was principally related to
the  full  redemption  of  the  Notes  due  2024  plus  an  increase  in  the  programs  of  repurchase  of  shares  and  quarterly  cash
distributions.

Indebtedness

As of December 31, 2023, and 2022, we had total outstanding indebtedness of US$501.0 million and US$497.6 million,

respectively, as set forth in the table below.

Notes due 2027
Total

Our material outstanding indebtedness is described below.

Notes due 2027

General

As of December 31, 

2023
2022
(in thousands of US$)

 500,981
 500,981

 497,642
 497,642

In January 2020, we issued US$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.5% senior notes due 2027 (the “Notes due
2027”).  In  April  2021,  we  reopened  our  Notes  due  2027,  issuing  an  additional  US$150.0  million  principal  amount.  The
reopening was priced above par at 101.875%, representing a yield to maturity of 5.117%. Final maturity will be January 17,
2027.

On  June  17,  2022,  we  received  requisite  consents  from  holders  of  the  Notes  due  2027  for  certain  amendments  to  the
indenture governing the Notes due 2027. The amendments addressed the impact of adverse market conditions and related drop
in the price of crude oil during 2020 on our results, which in turn negatively impacted the restricted payments builder basket,
and increased and reset the general restricted payments basket in the indenture to provide us additional restricted payments
capacity, giving us additional financial flexibility. Consequently, on June 27, 2022, we paid a consent fee equal to $10.00 per
$1,000 to holders of the Notes due 2027 that delivered their consents for the abovementioned amendments to the indenture
governing the Notes due 2027.

Ranking

The  Notes  due  2027  constitute  senior  unsubordinated  obligations  of  GeoPark  Limited  and  are  guaranteed  by  GeoPark
Colombia, S.L.U. (the “Guarantor”). The Notes due 2027 rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior
obligations of GeoPark Limited and the Guarantor (except those obligations preferred by operation of law, including without
limitation  labor  and  tax  claims);  rank  senior  in  right  of  payment  to  all  existing  and  future  subordinated  indebtedness  of
GeoPark Limited and the Guarantor; and rank effectively junior to any secured obligations of GeoPark Limited, the Guarantor
and their respective subsidiaries to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such obligations.

103

   
   
Table of Contents

Optional redemption

We may, at our option, redeem all or part of the Notes due 2027, at the redemption prices, expressed as percentages of
principal  amount,  set  forth  below,  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest  thereon  (including  additional  amounts),  if  any,  to  the
applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on January 17 of the years indicated below:

Year
2024
2025
2026 and after

Change of control

Percentage

 102.750 %
 101.375 %
 100.000 %

Upon the occurrence of certain events constituting a change of control, we are required to make an offer to repurchase all
outstanding Notes due 2027, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus any accrued and unpaid
interest (including any additional amounts payable in respect thereof) thereon to the date of purchase. If holders of not less
than 90% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes due 2027 validly tender and do not withdraw such notes and
we repurchase all such notes, we may redeem the Notes due 2027 that remain outstanding following such purchase at a price
in  cash  equal  to  101%  of  the  principal  amount  thereof  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest  to  but  excluding  the  date  of  such
redemption.

Covenants

The Notes due 2027 contain customary covenants, which include, among others, limitations on the incurrence of debt and
disqualified or preferred stock, restricted payments (including restrictions on our ability to pay dividends), incurrence of liens,
guarantees  of  additional  indebtedness,  the  ability  of  certain  subsidiaries  to  pay  dividends,  asset  sales,  transactions  with
affiliates, engaging in certain businesses and merger or consolidation with or into another company.

In  the  event  the  Notes  due  2027  receive  investment-grade  ratings  from  at  least  two  of  the  following  rating  agencies,
Standard  &  Poor’s,  Moody’s  and  Fitch,  and  no  default  has  occurred  or  is  continuing  under  the  indentures  governing  the
Notes due 2027, certain of these restrictions, including, among others, the limitations on incurrence of debt and disqualified or
preferred stock, restricted payments (including restrictions on our ability to pay dividends), the ability of certain subsidiaries
to pay dividends, asset sales and certain transactions with affiliates will no longer be applicable.

The indenture governing our Notes includes certain tests that must be satisfied before incurring additional debt, as well as
other  matters,  and  which  provide  among  other  things,  that  the  net  debt  to  EBITDA  ratio  should  not  exceed  3.25  and  the
EBITDA to interest ratio should exceed 2.5. Failure to comply with the incurrence test covenants does not trigger an event of
default.  However,  this  situation  may  limit  our  capacity  to  incur  additional  indebtedness,  as  specified  in  the  indenture
governing  the  Notes,  other  than  certain  categories  of  permitted  debt.  We  must  test  incurrence  covenants  before  incurring
additional  debt  or  performing  certain  corporate  actions  including  but  not  limited  to  making  dividend  payments,  restricted
payments and others (in each case with certain specific exceptions).

Events of default

Events  of  default  under  the  indentures  governing  the  Notes  due  2027  include:  the  nonpayment  of  principal  when  due;
default in the payment of interest, which continues for a period of 30 days; failure to make an offer to purchase and thereafter
accept tendered notes following the occurrence of a change of control or as required by certain covenants in the indentures
governing the Notes due 2027; cross payment default relating to debt with a principal amount of US$40.0 million or more,
and  cross-acceleration  default  following  a  judgment  for  US$40.0  million  or  more;  bankruptcy  and  insolvency  events;  and
invalidity or denial or disaffirmation of a guarantee of the notes. The occurrence of an event of default would permit or require
the principal of and accrued interest on the Notes due 2027 to become or to be declared due and payable.

104

   
 
Table of Contents

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2023, or as of December 31, 2022.

C.    Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

See  “Item  4.  Information  on  the  Company——B.  Business  Overview”  and  “Item  4.  Information  on  the  Company—B.

Business Overview—Title to properties.”

D.    Trend information

For  a  discussion  of  Trend  information,  see  “—A.  Operating  Results—Factors  affecting  our  results  of  operations”  and

“Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—2024 Strategy and Outlook.”

E.    Critical accounting policies and estimates

We  prepare  our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  in  accordance  with  IFRS  and  the  interpretations  of  the  IFRS
Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”), as issued by the IASB. The preparation of the financial statements requires us to make
judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related
disclosure  of  contingent  assets  and  liabilities.  We  continually  evaluate  these  estimates  and  assumptions  based  on  the  most
recently available information, our own historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results
could differ from those estimates.

An accounting policy is considered critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time such estimate is made, and if different accounting estimates that reasonably could
have  been  used,  or  changes  in  the  accounting  estimates  that  are  reasonably  likely  to  occur  periodically,  could  materially
impact the financial statements. We believe that the following accounting policies represent critical accounting policies as they
involve  a  higher  degree  of  judgment  and  complexity  in  their  application  and  require  us  to  make  significant  accounting
estimates.  The  following  descriptions  of  critical  accounting  policies  and  estimates  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  our
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes and other disclosures.

Reserves estimates

The  process  of  estimating  reserves  is  complex.  It  requires  significant  judgements  and  decisions  based  on  available
geological,  geophysical,  engineering  and  economic  data.  The  estimation  of  economically  recoverable  oil  and  natural  gas
reserves and related future net cash flows was performed based on the Reserve Report as of December 31, 2023, prepared by
DeGolyer and MacNaughton Corp., an independent international oil and gas consulting firm based in Dallas, Texas, in line
with  the  principles  contained  in  the  Society  of  Petroleum  Engineers  (SPE)  and  the  Petroleum  Resources  Management
Reporting System (PRMS) framework. It incorporates many factors and assumptions including:

● expected reservoir characteristics based on geological, geophysical and engineering assessments;
● future production rates based on historical performance and expected future operating and investment activities;
● future oil and gas prices and quality differentials;
● assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies;
● tax rates by jurisdiction, and
● future development and operating costs.

Our management believes these factors and assumptions are reasonable based on the information available to them at the
time  we  prepare  our  estimates.  However,  these  estimates  may  change  substantially  as  additional  data  from  ongoing
development  activities  and  production  performance  becomes  available  and  as  economic  conditions  impacting  oil  and  gas
prices and costs change.

105

Table of Contents

Such  changes  may  impact  the  Group’s  reported  financial  position  and  results,  which  include:  (a)  the  carrying  value  of
exploration and evaluation assets; oil and gas properties and other property, plant and equipment; which may be affected due
to changes in estimated future cash flows, (b) depreciation and amortization charges in the Consolidated Statement of Income,
which  may  change  where  such  charges  are  determined  using  the  unit  of  production  method,  or  where  the  useful  life  of  the
related  assets  change,  (c)  provisions  for  abandonment  that  may  require  revision  where  changes  to  reserves  estimates  affect
expectations  about  when  such  activities  will  occur  and  the  associated  cost  of  these  activities  and,  (d)  the  recognition  and
carrying value of deferred income tax assets that may change due to changes in the judgements regarding the existence of such
assets and in estimates of the likely recovery of such assets.

Cash flow estimates for impairment assessments

Cash  flow  estimates  for  impairment  assessments  of  non-financial  assets  require  assumptions  about  three  primary
elements:  future  prices,  reserves  and  discount  rate.  Estimates  of  future  prices  require  significant  judgments  about  highly
uncertain future events. Historically, oil and gas prices have exhibited significant volatility. The Group’s forecasts for oil and
gas  revenues  are  based  on  prices  derived  from  future  price  forecasts  amongst  industry  analysts  and  internal  assessments.
Estimates of future cash flows are generally based on assumptions of long-term prices and operating and development costs.
Given  the  significant  assumptions  required  and  the  possibility  that  actual  conditions  may  differ,  management  considers  the
assessment of impairment to be a critical accounting estimate.

For further information related to impairment of property, plant and equipment, please see Note 37 to our Consolidated

Financial Statements.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures

The  Group  adopts  the  successful  efforts  method  of  accounting.  Our  management  makes  assessments  and  estimates
regarding  whether  an  exploration  and  evaluation  asset  should  continue  to  be  carried  forward  as  such  when  insufficient
information exists. This assessment is made on a quarterly basis considering the advice from qualified experts.

The  application  of  the  Group’s  accounting  policy  for  exploration  and  evaluation  expenditure  requires  judgement  to
determine whether future economic benefits are likely from future either exploitation or sale, or whether activities have not
reached  a  stage  which  permits  a  reasonable  assessment  of  the  existence  of  reserves.  The  determination  of  reserves  and
resources is, in itself, an estimation process that involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on how the resources are
classified. These estimates directly impact when the Group defers exploration and evaluation expenditure. The deferral policy
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, in particular, whether
an  economically  viable  extraction  operation  can  be  established.  Any  such  estimates  and  assumptions  may  change  as  new
information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery
of the expenditure is unlikely, the relevant capitalized amount is written-off in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the
period when the new information becomes available.

Depreciation of oil and gas assets

Oil and gas assets held in property plant and equipment are mainly depreciated on a unit of production (“UOP”) basis at a
rate  calculated  by  reference  to  proven  and  probable  reserves  and  incorporating  the  estimated  future  cost  of  developing  and
extracting those reserves. Future development costs are estimated using assumptions as to the numbers of wells required to
produce those reserves, the cost of the wells and future production facilities. This results in a depreciation charge proportional
to the depletion of the anticipated remaining production from the block.

The  life  of  each  item,  which  is  assessed  at  least  annually,  has  regard  to  both  its  physical  life  limitations  and  present
assessments of economically recoverable reserves of the block at which the asset is located. These calculations require the use
of estimates and assumptions, including the amount of recoverable reserves and estimates of future capital expenditure. The
calculation of the UOP rate of depreciation will be impacted to the extent that actual production in the future is different from
current  forecast  production  based  on  total  proved  and  probable  reserves,  or  future  capital  expenditure  estimates  change.
Changes to proved and probable reserves could arise due to changes in the factors or assumptions used

106

Table of Contents

in  estimating  reserves,  including:  (a)  the  effect  on  proved  and  probable  reserves  of  differences  between  actual  commodity
prices and commodity price assumptions and (b) unforeseen operational issues.

Asset retirement obligations

Obligations  related  to  the  abandonment  of  wells  once  operations  are  terminated  may  result  in  the  recognition  of
significant liabilities. We record the fair value of the liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the wells
are  drilled.  When  the  liability  is  initially  recognized,  the  cost  is  also  capitalized  by  increasing  the  carrying  amount  of  the
related  asset.  Over  time,  the  liability  is  accreted  to  its  present  value  at  each  reporting  date,  and  the  capitalized  cost  is
depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. Estimating the future abandonment costs is difficult and requires
management to make estimates and judgments because most of the obligations will be settled after many years. Technologies
and  costs  are  constantly  changing,  as  well  as  political,  environmental,  health,  safety  and  public  relations  considerations.
Consequently, the timing and future cost of abandonment are subject to significant modification. Any change in the variables
underlying our assumptions and estimates can have a significant effect on the liability and the related capitalized asset. The
present value of future costs necessary for well abandonment is calculated for each area at the present value of the estimated
future expenditure. The liability recognized is based upon estimated future abandonment costs, wells subject to abandonment,
time to abandonment, and future inflation rates.

The expected timing, extent and amount of expenditure may also change, for example, in response to changes in oil and
gas reserves or changes in laws and regulations or their interpretation. Therefore, significant estimates and assumptions are
made in determining the provision for decommissioning. As a result, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions
established which would affect future financial results.

The  provision  at  reporting  date  represents  management’s  best  estimate  of  the  present  value  of  the  future  abandonment

costs required.

Contingencies

(1) From time to time, we may be subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings that arise in the normal course of
business,  including  employment,  commercial,  tax,  environmental  and  health  &  safety  matters.  For  example,  from
time  to  time,  the  Company  receives  notices  of  environmental,  health  and  safety  violations.  Based  on  what  our
Management currently knows, such claims are not expected to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

107

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A.

Directors and executive officers

Board of directors

Our board of directors is currently composed of nine members. Our directors are elected by shareholders annually at the
Company’s annual general meeting and can hold office for such term as the shareholders may determine or, in the absence of
such determination, until the next annual general meeting or until their successors are elected or appointed or their office is
otherwise vacated. The term for the current directors expires on the date of our next annual general meeting of shareholders to
be held in 2024.

The current members of the board of directors were appointed at our annual general meeting held on July 19, 2023. The
table below sets forth certain information concerning our current board of directors. All ages are current as of March 27, 2024.

Name
Sylvia Escovar Gómez (1)(2)
James F. Park
Robert Bedingfield (1)(2)
Constantin Papadimitriou (1)(2)
Somit Varma (1)
Brian F. Maxted (1)
Carlos E. Macellari (1)
Marcela Vaca
Andrés Ocampo

Position

Chair and Director
Deputy Chair, Director and Co-founder
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Chief Executive Officer and Director

(1) Independent director under SEC Audit Committee rules.
(2) Member of the Audit Committee.

    At the Company 

Age
62
68
75
63
63
66
70
55
45

since
2020
2002
2015
2018
2020
2022
2022
2012
2010

Biographical information of the current members of our board of directors is set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated,

the current business address for our directors is Calle 94 No. 11-30, 8th floor, Bogotá, Colombia.

Sylvia Escovar Gómez has been a member of our board of directors since August 2020 and was appointed as Chair on
June  6,  2021.  An  economist  by  training,  she  received  her  undergraduate  degree  from  the  Universidad  de  Los  Andes  in
Colombia. She has had a long and prestigious career in both the public and private sectors, having worked for the World Bank,
the  Central  Bank  of  Colombia  and  the  Colombian  National  Department  of  Planning.  Previously,  she  served  as  Deputy
Secretary  of  Education  and  Deputy  Secretary  of  Finance  for  Bogota’s  government  as  well  as  Vice  President  of  Finance  of
Fiduciaria  Bancolombia.  Ms.  Escovar  was  the  CEO  of Terpel  S.A.,  a  fuel  distribution  company  that  operates  in  Colombia,
Ecuador, Panama, Peru and the Dominican Republic from 2012 until December 2020. In 2014, Ms. Escovar was named the
top businessperson of the year by Portafolio, Colombia’s leading financial daily. In 2018, she received the National Order of
Merit  for  spearheading  private  sector  support  for  peacebuilding  and  reconciliation  in  Colombia.  In  2020,  she  was  the  only
woman on the Corporate Reputation Business Monitor’s list of Colombian leaders with the best reputation to rank in the top
10. In 2023, Forbes named Sylvia Escovar as one of the 100 most powerful women in Colombia. Ms. Escovar’s other Board
memberships  include  Grupo  Bancolombia,  Empresa  de  Telecomunicaciones  de  Bogotá,  Organización  Corona  S.A.,
Organización Terpel, Compañía de Medicina EPS Sanitas and Grupo Energía Bogotá.

James F. Park since co-founding the Company in 2002, has served for 20 years as our Chief Executive Officer until his
retirement effective June 30, 2022. He initially funded, built the team, and led the strategy and growth of GeoPark from its
small footprint at the southern tip of South America into becoming one of the leading oil and gas companies operating across
Latin America today. He continues to serve as Vice Chair of our board of directors and advisor to the team. Beginning as a
drilling rig roughneck in his teenage years, Mr. Park has more than 50 years of experience in all phases of the upstream oil and
gas business, with a record of achievement in the acquisition, technical operation, and management

108

   
   
Table of Contents

of international projects and teams across the globe - including projects in North America, Central America, South America,
Asia, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East - and with a successful emphasis on people, communities, and the environment. He
earned a Bachelor of Science in Geophysics from the University of California at Berkeley and previously worked as a research
scientist focused on earthquakes and tectonics at the University of Texas. Mr. Park is a member of the board of directors of
GoodRock LLC, Spark Resources LLC and Rocabuena S.A.S., and is a former Board member of the humanitarian non-profit
SEE  (Surgical  Eye  Expeditions)  International,  and  the  service  and  advocacy  non-profit  Girls,  Inc.  He  is  a  member  of  the
AAPG and SPE, has a degree in environmental management, and has lived in Latin America since 2002.

Robert  Bedingfield  has  been  a  member  of  our  board  of  directors  since  March  2015.  He  holds  a  degree  in Accounting
from  the  University  of  Maryland  and  is  a  Certified  Public  Accountant.  Until  his  retirement  in  June  2013,  he  was  one  of
Ernst & Young’s most senior Global Lead Partners with more than 40 years of experience, including 32 years as a partner in
Ernst & Young’s accounting and auditing practices, as well as serving on Ernst & Young’s Senior Governing Board. He has
extensive experience serving Fortune 500 companies; including acting as Lead Audit Partner or Senior Advisory Partner for
Lockheed Martin, AES, Gannett, General Dynamics, Booz Allen Hamilton, Marriott and the US Postal Service. Since 2000,
Mr.  Bedingfield  has  been  a Trustee,  and  at  times  an  Executive  Committee  Member,  and  the Audit  Committee  Chair  of  the
University of Maryland at College Park Board of Trustees. Mr. Bedingfield served on the National Executive Board (1995 to
2003) and National Advisory Council (since 2003) of the Boy Scouts of America. From 2013 to 2023, Mr. Bedingfield served
as Board Member and Chairman of the Audit Committee of NYSE-listed Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Mr.
Bedingfield became age ineligible to serve on SAIC’s board on June 7, 2023.

Constantin Papadimitriou has been a member of our board of directors since May 2018. He is a respected and successful
international  investor  and  businessman,  with  more  than  30  years  of  investment  experience  in  global  capital  markets  and  in
resource and industrial projects and was an early investor in GeoPark. Mr. Papadimitriou was for 18 years the Head of General
Oriental Investments S.A., the Investment Manager of the Cavenham Funds, as part of the Cavamont Group founded by the
Late Sir James Goldsmith. During his tenure at the Cavamont group, Mr. Papadimitriou was initially responsible for Treasury
Management,  then  the  Private  Equity  Portfolio  as  well  as  representing  the  group  on  the  Boards  of  associated  companies
including investments in the oil and gas, mining, real estate, and gaming sectors (including Basic Petroleum, a Nasdaq-listed
Guatemalan  oil  and  gas  company).  He  is  a  founding  partner  of  Diorasis  International,  a  company  mainly  focusing  on
investments in Greece and the broader Balkans in Aquaculture, and he also chairs the Greek Language School of Geneva and
Lausanne. Mr. Papadimitriou holds an Economics and Finance degree and a post-graduate Diploma in European Studies from
Geneva University. Mr. Papadimitriou is currently a member of the board of directors of Cavamont Holdings Limited, General
Oriental Advisory (formerly known as General Oriental Investments S.A.), Diorasis International S.A. and Tellco AG.

Somit  Varma  has  been  a  member  of  our  board  of  directors  since  August  2020.  He  has  been  a  proven  and  respected
investor in oil, gas, mining, and infrastructure projects across the globe for more than three decades. During his time at the
International Finance Corporation (IFC), he was the Global Head of Oil, Gas, Mining and Chemicals, Chairman of the IFC
Oil, Gas, Mining and Chemicals Investment Committee and Chairman of the Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership. From
2011 until July 2020, Mr. Varma was a Managing Director of the Energy Group at Warburg Pincus LLC, one of the world’s
premier  private  equity  firms.  Throughout  his  tenure  at  Warburg  Pincus,  Mr.  Varma  served  on  the  boards  of  several
international  energy  companies  where  he  worked  with  management  teams  on  a  diverse  set  of  issues  including  new
acquisitions,  strategic  partnerships,  capital  allocation,  risk  management,  succession  planning,  and  growing  and  mentoring
teams.  Mr.  Varma  was  Chairman  of  the  Energy  and  Infrastructure  Council  of  EMPEA,  the  global  industry  association  for
private capital in emerging markets. He is also currently an advisor to a global private equity firm and a family office. Mr.
Varma  earned  his  MBA  at  Boston  University  before  attending  the  Executive  Development  Program  at  Harvard  Business
School.  During  the  last  5  years,  Mr.  Varma  has  served  as  board  member  of  several  companies  including  Delonex  Energy,
Zenith International, Apex Energy and Zenith US.

Brian F. Maxted has been a member of our board of directors since July 2022. He holds a bachelor’s degree in geology
from  the  University  of  Sheffield  and  a  master’s  degree  in  organic  geochemistry  and  petrology  from  the  University  of
Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Mr. Maxted is a proven oil and gas explorer, private equity entrepreneur and public company leader in
the upstream E&P business, with a global track record of significant basin and play discoveries over 30 years. He spent the
first part of his professional life from the late 1970s working for BP in locations including Europe, Africa,

109

Table of Contents

North America and South America, where he was involved in the discovery of Colombia’s giant Cusiana and Cupiagua oil
fields in the early 1990s. During the second half of his career from the mid-1990s through the 2010s Mr. Maxted held various
exploration leadership roles for US-based independents, including Triton Energy and Hess Corporation. In 2003, Mr. Maxted
became a founding partner and later the CEO/CXO and Board Director of Kosmos Energy. Mr. Maxted retired from Kosmos
in  2019  and  established  Limatus  Energy  Advisory  Limited  to  provide  strategic  counsel  to  upstream  E&P  companies.  In
addition,  he  led  the  formation  of  Lapis  Energy,  a  company  focused  on  carbon  solutions  in  the  US  Lower  48,  where  he
currently serves as Chair of the Board. Mr. Maxted is also a member of the board of directors of JHI Energy – now Triple 7
Energy Inc.

Carlos  E.  Macellari  has  been  a  member  of  our  board  of  directors  since  July  2022.  He  holds  a  bachelor’s  degree  in
geology from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata in Argentina, and a master´s degree and a PhD in geology from Ohio State
University.  He  has  over  30  years  of  successful  exploration,  development  and  management  experience  in  the  oil  and  gas
industry across several continents, at Tecpetrol, Repsol YPF, Hocol, Benton Oil & Gas, Enron Oil & Gas International and
Pecten  International  (Shell  Oil).  As  Director  of  Exploration  and  Development  for  Tecpetrol,  he  led  the  subsurface  team
responsible for making Fortín de Piedra the largest gas producing block in Argentina, and the discovery and development of
the  Pendare  Field  in  Colombia.  As  Worldwide  Director  of  Geology,  he  also  led  the  technical  group  behind  Repsol’s
exploration  success  in  locations  such  as  Libya, Algeria,  Pre-Salt  Brazil,  the  Gulf  of  Mexico,  Venezuela  and  Peru.  He  has
published  over  50  technical  papers  and  has  been  guest  lecturer  in  numerous  international  forums.  He  is  the  founder  of  the
Journal of South American Earth Sciences, has lectured several courses in the USA, Colombia, Spain and Argentina and is
currently a professor for postgraduate students at Universidad Nacional de La Plata. At present he is an independent consultant
on oil and gas exploration and production after founding and managing Andes Energy Consulting, since 2020 he has been a
Board  member  at  Inverban  Investments,  Tecpetrol  Investments,  Tecpetrol  International  and  Suizum,  and  since  2024
independent board member at Olympic Peru.

Marcela Vaca joined GeoPark in August 2012 and served as General Director until August 2022. She has been a member
of  our  board  of  directors  since  July  2022.  She  has  more  than  20  years  of  experience  in  planning,  legal,  environmental  and
social articulation and management of hydrocarbon exploration and production projects in Colombia and elsewhere in Latin
America. Under her leadership as Director for Colombia and General Director, GeoPark became one of the leading oil and gas
companies  in  the  country.  She  plays  a  crucial  role  in  advancing  GeoPark’s  diversity,  equality  and  inclusion  efforts,  and
promotes female empowerment as a key to the economic development of Latin America. Prior to joining our company, for
nine years Ms. Vaca was the CEO of the Hupecol Group, where her achievements included leading the development of the
Caracara field and the construction of the Jaguar–Santiago Pipeline. From November 2000 to June 2003, she worked as Legal,
Administrative  and  External Affairs  Manager  at  GHK  Company  Colombia.  Bloomberg  Linea  includes  Ms. Vaca  in  its  500
most  influential  people  in  Latin America,  and  in  2020,  2021  and  2022  Forbes  named  her  as  one  of  the  50  most  powerful
women in Colombia. Ms. Vaca was a member of the board of directors of the Colombian Oil Association (ACP, Asociación
Colombiana de Petróleo) from 2010 to 2021 and served as Chair of the Board until March 2022. Marcela graduated in Law
with a specialization in Commercial Law from the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and is a Fulbright Scholar
with  a  Summa  Cum  Laude  Master  (LLM)  from  Georgetown  University  in  the  USA.  Currently,  Ms.  Vaca  serves  as  board
member at Corficolombiana and Fundación Juanfe.

Andrés Ocampo has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board of directors since July 2022. He
previously  served  as  our  Chief  Financial  Officer  (from  November  2013  through  June  2022)  and  Director  of  Growth  and
Capital Markets (from January 2011 through October 2013), and has been with our company since July 2010. Mr. Ocampo
holds  a  Bachelor’s  degree  in  Economics  from  Universidad  Católica  Argentina,  has  more  than  17  years  of  experience  in
business  and  finance. Andrés  has  been  instrumental  in  helping  GeoPark  reach  some  of  its  greatest  milestones,  including  its
entry  into  Colombia  and  Brazil,  the  IPO  on  the  New  York  Stock  Exchange,  the  acquisition  of  Amerisur  Resources  and
significant acreage expansion in Colombia. Our board of directors appointed Mr. Ocampo to serve as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company effective July 1, 2022, by virtue of his wide experience in business management and finance together with his
character, vision, knowledge of the Company and his proven ability to lead successful teams. Before joining our Company,
Mr.  Ocampo  worked  at  Crédit  Agricole  Corporate  &  Investment  Bank  and  Citigroup,  focusing  on  the  oil  and  gas  and
commodities industries.

110

Table of Contents

Executive officers

Our executive officers are responsible for the management and representation of our company. The table below sets forth

certain information concerning our executive officers. All ages are current as of March 27, 2024.

Name
Andrés Ocampo
Jaime Caballero Uribe
Augusto Zubillaga
James Deckelman
Rodolfo Martín Terrado
Mónica Jiménez
Agustina Wisky

Position

Chief Executive Officer and Director
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Technical Officer
Chief Exploration Officer
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Strategy, Sustainability and Legal Officer
Chief People Officer

    At the Company

Age
45
49
54
67
49
48
47

 since
2010
2024
2006
2023
2018
2022
2002

Biographical  information  of  our  executive  officers  is  set  forth  below.  Unless  otherwise  indicated,  the  current  business

address of our executive officers is Calle 94 No. 11-30, 8th floor, Bogotá, Colombia.

Jaime  Caballero  Uribe  has  served  as  our  Chief  Financial  Officer  since  January  2024.  He  has  more  than  25  years  of
industry  and  finance  experience,  including  senior  positions  in  large  corporations  as  well  as  in  start-ups  and  entrepreneurial
businesses. Until August 2023, Mr. Caballero was Group CFO at Ecopetrol, the largest corporation in Colombia and one of the
400 largest companies in the world where he helped the management team achieve various performance records, including the
delivery  of  more  than  US$20  billion  in  growth  financing  and  debt  refinance.  During  his  tenure,  he  was  recognized  by  the
Institutional Investor publication as one of the top three sector CFOs in Latin America. Previously, he held multiple positions
at  BP  plc  over  17  years,  where  his  most  recent  appointment  was  CFO  for  the  Brazil  Region,  which  includes  Colombia,
Uruguay and Venezuela. Mr. Caballero holds a degree in Law from Universidad de Los Andes, an MBA in Energy Business
from  Fundação  Getulio  Vargas,  and  certificates  in  CFO  Excellence  from  Wharton  and  Energy  Innovation  and  Emerging
Technologies from Stanford. Mr. Caballero currently serves as a board member of Agricola Cerro Prieto S.A.

Augusto Zubillaga has served as our Chief Technical Officer since July 2022. He previously served in other management
positions  throughout  the  Company  including  as  Chief  Operating  Officer,  Operations  Director,  Argentina  Director  and
Production  Director.  He  is  a  petroleum  engineer  with  more  than  26  years  of  experience  in  production,  engineering,  well
completions, corrosion control, reservoir management and field development. He has a degree in petroleum engineering from
the Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Zubillaga worked for Petrolera Argentina San
Jorge  S.A.  and  Chevron  San  Jorge  S.A. At  Chevron  San  Jorge  S.A.,  he  led  multi-disciplinary  teams  focused  on  improving
production, costs and safety, and was the leader of the Asset Development Team, which was responsible for creating the field
development plan and estimating and auditing the oil and gas reserves of the Trapial field in Argentina. Mr. Zubillaga was also
part of a Chevron San Jorge S.A. team that was responsible for identifying business opportunities and working with the head
office on the establishment of best business practices. He has authored several industry papers, including papers on electrical
submersible pump optimization, corrosion control, water handling and intelligent production systems.

James Deckelman  has served as our Chief Exploration Officer since October 2023. He is a highly successful explorer
with  over  25  years  of  experience  in  Latin  America,  the  Middle  East,  Africa,  Southeast  Asia  and  North  America,  leading
projects ranging from ultra-deepwater to unconventional. Mr. Deckelman added over a billion barrels of recoverable resources
for companies including ConocoPhillips, BP and Talisman Energy. In Latin America, he has led projects and transactions in
Colombia,  Venezuela,  Peru,  Ecuador,  Mexico,  Brazil  and  Argentina.  Mr.  Deckelman  is  highly  experienced  in  investment
evaluation, new asset capture, and delivering production and reserve growth. He has a Master´s degree in geology from Utah
State University and has authored over 15 industry publications focused on Latin America. Among other awards, in 2021, he
was recognized as one of “Industry’s 100 Who Made a Difference” by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.

111

   
   
Table of Contents

Rodolfo Martín Terrado has served as our Chief Operating Officer since July 2022. He previously served as our Director
of Operations since he joined GeoPark in August 2018. Mr. Terrado has more than 25 years of experience in the oil industry,
working in field development and operations. Martín has a degree in Petroleum Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico de
Buenos Aires (ITBA) and an MBA from the IAE Business School at the Universidad Austral in Buenos Aires. He is a member
of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). Prior to joining GeoPark, Mr. Terrado worked for Petrolera Argentina San Jorge
and  Chevron  San  Jorge  S.A.  in  different  international  operations,  including  in Argentina,  the  United  States  and  Venezuela.
Mr. Terrado previously led heavy oil operations in Venezuela assets and his prior responsibilities include waterflooding, CO2
flooding and unconventionals.

Mónica Jiménez has served as our Chief Strategy, Sustainability and Legal Officer and Company Secretary since August
2022.  She  leads  the  strategy  and  sustainability  (ESG)  within  the  Company  and  leads  the  governance  and  legal  team.  Mrs.
Jiménez is an experienced attorney in corporate and international law in Canada and Colombia with extensive experience in
international commercial and investment arbitration. After living in Canada for more than 16 years, Mrs. Jiménez was Vice
President  of  Corporate  Affairs  and  Secretary  General  of  Ecopetrol  (NYSE),  Colombia´s  largest  company,  before  joining
GeoPark. Mrs. Jiménez studied Law at Universidad the Los Andes, has a postgraduate degree in Civil Liability and Damages
from the Universidad Externado de Colombia, and a Master of Science in Development Studies from the London School of
Economics (LSE). Recognized as one of the leading in-house lawyers in Colombia by The Legal 500 GC Powerlist: Colombia
2022 and 2023, Mrs. Jiménez is a current member of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of
Commerce (ICC). She has served as board member of several companies and is currently a member of the Board of Grupo
Bolivar S.A.

Agustina  Wisky  is  GeoPark’s  Chief  People  Officer,  responsible  for  enriching  and  promoting  an  organizational  culture
based on trust, teamwork, continuous improvement, mutual respect, and diversity. Agustina has been with the Company since
it  was  founded  in  2002,  and  she  created  and  has  led  the  People  department  for  over  15  years,  guided  by  the  principles  of
attracting,  motivating  and  developing  the  best  professionals,  and  ensuring  the  comprehensive  wellbeing  of  staff  and  their
families. She previously held the position of Performance Director at GeoPark. Before joining GeoPark, Agustina worked at
PricewaterhouseCoopers and AES Gener in Argentina. Agustina is a Public Accountant and has a Master’s degree in Human
Resources  from  the  IAE  Business  School  of  the  Universidad  Austral  in  Buenos  Aires,  Argentina.  Thanks  to  Agustina’s
leadership in the implementation of inclusion and diversity best practices, GeoPark won the Equipares Silver Award in 2020,
which  is  given  by  the  Government  of  Colombia  with  technical  support  from  the  United  Nations  Development  Program.
GeoPark was furthermore included in the Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index (GEI) in 2022, which evaluates the performance
of listed companies that are committed to transparency in gender reporting.

B.      Compensation

Executive officers and director compensation

For the year ended December 31, 2023, we paid an aggregate of US$2.0 million to the members of our board of directors
for  their  services  in  all  capacities.  This  amount  includes  payments  made  to  Mr.  Carlos  Macellari  for  his  services  as  a
consultant for the period from May to August 2023. It does not include payments made to executive director Andrés Ocampo
as he only received compensation in his capacity as an executive officer (as described below). Disclosure of compensation on
an individual basis is included in Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statement.

During this same period, we paid an aggregate of US$8.9 million for salaries and other benefits (including with respect to
grants of awards under the LTIP Executives and contingent amounts or deferred compensation accrued for the year, even if
payable at a later date) to the executive officers of the Company for their services in all capacities.

Annual Bonus Program

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth that the Compensation Committee will evaluate annually the performance
of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Company based on objective and relevant corporate goals
and that the board of directors, in consultation with and at the recommendation of the Compensation Committee will review
executive officers’ annual performance evaluations. In addition, the Charter of the Compensation Committee establishes that
the Committee shall review and approve written annual and longer-term corporate goals and

112

Table of Contents

objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, making sure that they are
appropriately linked to the Company´s strategy.

In  this  regard,  the  Compensation  Committee  reviews  and  recommends  that  the  board  of  directors  approve  the  annual
performance scorecard that contains the performance metrics and objective criteria against which the Chief Executive Officer
and  other  executive  officers  are  evaluated.  Depending  on  the  performance  evaluation,  the  amounts  to  be  paid  to  the  Chief
Executive  Officer  and  other  executive  officers  as  annual  bonuses  are  recommended  by  the  Committee  and  submitted  to  be
approved  by  our  board  of  directors.  The  2023  performance  bonus  approved  by  our  board  of  directors  on  March  6,  2024,
corresponds  to  65%  score  payout  applied  to  target  annual  bonus  of  each  executive  officer,  including  the  Chief  Executive
Officer.

CEO Transition Agreement

Mr.  James  F.  Park  (former  CEO  of  the  Company  and  current  non-executive  member  of  the  board  of  directors  and
consultant of the Company, advising on M&A and strategic matters) has a consulting agreement with the Company, approved
by the board of directors on March 2022, as part of the transition of the CEO position. Such agreement governs his consulting
services and does not provide for payments upon a termination of service (other than previously earned or accrued amounts).
Pursuant to the terms of his transition agreement, James F. Park was provided certain severance benefits, including (i) cash
severance payments, payable in a combination of cash and stock, (ii) accelerated vesting of unvested equity awards, and (iii)
administrative support for 1-2 years, reimbursement for reasonable relocation costs and 12 months of health and life insurance
premiums.

Senior Management Severance

Our board of directors determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to provide certain
members of the Company’s senior management with payments and benefits in connection with certain qualified terminations
and/or in connection with certain change in control scenarios. Therefore, the board of directors approved the adoption of an
Executive  Termination  and  Change  in  Control  Benefits  Plan  (the  “Severance  Plan”).  In  addition,  the  board  of  directors
approved an employment agreement with our current CEO, Andrés Ocampo, which provides for severance benefits consistent
with those provided under the Severance Plan.

In the event of a termination of the executive’s employment without cause, resignation for good reason or termination due
to the executive’s death or disability within 24 months following a change in control, the executive will be entitled to receive
the following, subject to the execution of a release of claims: (i) cash severance in an amount equal to 2 times the sum of (x)
the executive’s annual base salary, (y) the average of any cash bonuses paid in the two years preceding the termination date
and  (z)  an  amount  equal  to  the  lesser  of  15%  of  the  executive’s  annual  base  salary  or  US$50,000;  and  (ii)  to  the  extent
permitted by applicable law, continued health benefits, at the Company’s cost, for 12 months following their termination of
employment. In addition, the Severance Plan provides that, in the event an executive has relocated at the Company’s request
and is terminated during the 12 months following the change in control, the executive will be provided the costs for relocation
back to their home country.

In the event of a termination of the executive’s employment without cause, resignation for good reason or termination due
to the executive’s death or disability, other than in the 24 months following a change in control, then, subject to the execution
of  a  release  of  claims,  the  executive  sill  be  entitled  to  the  following  benefits:  (i)  cash  severance  in  an  amount  equal  to  1.5
times  (or,  in  the  case  of  the  CEO,  2  times)  the  sum  of  (x)  the  executive’s  annual  base  salary,  (y)  the  average  of  any  cash
bonuses paid in the two years preceding the termination and (z) an amount equal to the lesser of 15% of the executive’s annual
base salary or US$50,000, and (ii) to the extent permitted by applicable law, continued health benefits, at the Company’s cost,
for 12 months following their termination of employment. In addition, the executive’s unvested equity awards will accelerate
pro-rata (in the case of performance equity awards, subject to achievement of the applicable performance metrics).

Pursuant to the Severance Plan, in the event of a change in control, outstanding performance equity awards will convert
into a number of time-based equity awards based on actual performance through the date of the change in control and, except
as set forth below, will vest in accordance with the awards’ original schedule, subject to the executive’s

113

Table of Contents

continued service through such date. In the event of a termination of the executive’s employment without cause, resignation
for good reason or termination due to the executive’s death or disability within 24 months following a change in control: (i) all
outstanding  time-vesting  equity  awards  will  fully  accelerate  and  vest;  and  (ii)  performance  equity  awards,  as  converted  in
accordance with clause (i) above, will fully accelerate and vest. In the event that the acquiror cashes out outstanding equity
awards at closing of the change in control, then, at closing, (i) performance awards will accelerate, and vest based on actual
performance through the date of the change in control and (ii) all outstanding time-vesting equity awards will fully accelerate
and vest.

GeoPark Limited 2018 Equity Incentive Plan

Given the expiration of our Stock Awards Plan on November 3, 2018, on November 5, 2018, we adopted the 2018 Equity
Incentive  Plan  (the  “Plan”)  to  motivate  and  reward  those  participating  employees  and  executives  to  perform  at  the  highest
level and to further the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. The Plan is designed as an omnibus plan, pursuant
to  which  we  may  grant  awards  in  the  form  of  options,  share  appreciation  rights,  restricted  shares,  restricted  stock  units,
performance  awards,  other  share-based  awards  or  other  cash-based  awards  throughout  the  ten  (10)-year  term  of  the  Plan.
Subject  to  adjustments  as  set  forth  in  the  Plan,  the  maximum  number  of  shares  available  for  issuance  under  the  Plan  is
5,000,000 shares. The applicable award documentation will set forth the terms and conditions of the awards granted under the
Plan, including, but not limited to, the vesting conditions and the effect on a termination of service or a Change in Control on
awards.

The following table sets forth the common share awards granted to our employees and executive officers under the Plan

which are outstanding as of the date of this annual report:

Number of underlying common shares outstanding
800,000 (1)
215,000 (2)
25,000 (4)
571,984 (5)
197,197 (6)
1,000,000 (7)
5,968 (8)
20,000 (9)
25,000 (10)
351,971 (11)

Grant date
01/01/2020
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
10/01/2022
02/14/2023
01/02/2023
10/01/2023
10/01/2023
01/15/2024
02/14/2024

Vesting date
01/02/2023
03/31/2025 (3)
03/31/2025
01/02/2025
01/02/2026
01/02/2026
01/02/2026
10/01/2026
01/15/2027
01/02/2027

(1) On November 6, 2019, our board of directors approved a share-based compensation program for approximately 800,000
shares  to  be  granted  in  2020.  Considering  the  performance  conditions,  the  Compensation  Committee  determined  that
only  a  total  of  152,030  shares  have  vested.  As  of  December  31,  2023,  61,980  shares  have  been  exercised,  with  a
remaining amount of 90,050 shares to be exercised.

(2) Awards corresponding to the Retention and Hiring Bonus scheme.
(3) The vesting date is March 31, 2025, or 3 years from grant date.
(4) Service agreement. The awards granted under this agreement vest in three annual installments (March 31, 2023, March
31, 2024, and March 31, 2025). As of December 31, 2023, 8,333 shares have been exercised, with a remaining amount of
16,666 shares to be exercised.

(5) Awards corresponding to the LTIP Executives. The vesting date of the RSUs is annually during a three-year period and

the vesting date of the PSUs will be on January 2, 2025.

(6) Awards corresponding to the LTIP Executives. The vesting date of the RSUs is annually during a three-year period and

the vesting date of the PSUs will be on January 2, 2026.

(7) Awards corresponding to LTIP Employees approved in December 2022. The vesting date of the RSUs is annually during

a three-year period and the vesting date of the PSUs will be on January 2, 2026.

(8) Awards corresponding to the LTIP Executives. The vesting date of the RSUs is annually during a three-year period and

the vesting date of the PSUs will be on January 2, 2026.

(9) Awards corresponding to the Hiring Bonus scheme.
(10) Awards corresponding to the Hiring Bonus scheme.

114

Table of Contents

(11) Awards corresponding to the LTIP Executives. The vesting date of the RSUs is annually during a three-year period and

the vesting date of the PSUs will be on January 2, 2027.

Currently, we have the following incentive equity programs in place under the Plan: the Stock Awards Program (“Stock
Awards  Program”),  the  Retention  and  Hiring  Bonus  Scheme,  the  Long-Term  Incentive  Program  for  Executives  (“LTIP
Executives”) and the Long-Term Incentive Program for Employees (“LTIP Employees”).

Employees

Long-Term Incentive Program to Employees (“LTIP Employees”)

In  December  2022,  our  board  of  directors,  based  on  the  recommendation  of  the  Compensation  Committee,  approved  a

new Long-Term Incentive program for employees and new hirings. Main characteristics of the program are:

● All employees (non-top management) and new hirings are eligible.
● 3-year program, with a grant date of January 2, 2023, or the date on which the employees are hired.
● The components of the program are the following:

-
-

-

30% Time-based RSUs: vesting annually ratably in three equal installments;
30% Company Performance: measured over three-year performance period (December 2022-December 2025);
and
40% Absolute Performance Shares: share price at the date of vesting must be higher than the share price at the
date of grant or date of hiring.

● The vesting date of the Performance Shares (Company and Absolute) will be on January 2, 2026.

Executive officers

Long-Term Incentive Program to Executive Officers (“LTIP Executives”)

In March 2022, our board of directors, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a new

Long-Term Incentive program for the executive officers. Main characteristics of the program are:

● All executive officers are eligible.
● Grants are awarded annually to executive officers.
● The components of the program are the following:

-

-

-

20% Time-based Restricted Share Units (RSUs) vesting ratably in three equal installments on each of the first
three anniversaries of the grant date;
35%  Relative  Performance  Share  Units  based  on  relative  total  shareholder  return  (TSR)  and  measured  over
three-year performance period relative to peer group; and
45% Absolute Performance Share Units (PSUs) based on absolute total shareholder return (TSR) and measured
over three-year performance period.

In 2022, the Compensation Committee approved grants with respect to the LTIP Executives of an estimated 571,984 total
shares,  to  vest  during  a  three-year  period.  On  February  17,  2023,  the  Compensation  Committee  approved  a  new  grant,
effective  as  of  February  14,  2023,  of  197,197  shares  to  vest  during  a  three-year  period.  On  February  26,  2024,  the
Compensation Committee approved a new grant, effective as of February 14, 2024, of 351,971 shares to vest during a three-
year period.

On January 25, 2023, and February 26, 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that 246,110 and 86,602 shares,
respectively, should be delivered to the participants according to the first and second vesting periods of the abovementioned
grants.

115

Table of Contents

Non-Executive Director Plan

In August 2014, our board of directors adopted the Non-Executive Director Plan in order to grant shares to non-executive
directors  as  part  of  their  compensation  program  for  serving  as  directors  (the  “Non-Executive  Director  Plan”).  The  Non-
Executive Director Plan was amended and restated in October 2016, when additional 1,000,000 shares were registered as the
maximum number of shares available to be issued under this plan. In accordance with the resolutions adopted by our board of
directors on May 20, 2014, our non-executive directors are paid their quarterly fees in the form of equity awards granted under
the Non-Executive Director Plan. Under the Non-Executive Director Plan, the compensation committee may award common
shares, restricted share units and other share-based awards that may be denominated or payable in common shares or factors
that influence the value of common shares.

Potential dilution resulting from Equity Incentive Compensation Plans

In accordance with the equity awards granted by the Company under its Stock Awards Program and the Plan, as of March
19,  2024,  there  were  1,850,149  outstanding  shares  that  had  been  awarded  but  which  had  not  yet  vested,  representing
approximately 3.3% of the total issued share capital as of that date.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In December 2022, to further align the interests of our executive officers with those of the Company’s shareholders, our
board  of  directors  approved  minimum  stock  ownership  guidelines  applicable  to  the  Company’s  executive  officers,  as
determined by the board of directors. Each such executive officer is required to hold, within five years after the adoption of
the guidelines or, if later, within five years after becoming subject to the policy, a number of shares with an aggregate value of
at least three times his or her annual base salary. Shares beneficially owned by the applicable officer or held in a family trust
established  by  the  applicable  executive  officer  and  shares  underlying  vested  equity  awards  (which,  in  the  case  of  stock
options, are at- or in-the-money) are taken into account for purposes of determining compliance with these guidelines. Until
an officer has met his or her ownership requirement, he or she is required to retain at least 50% of shares received from the
vesting,  settlement  or  exercise  of  equity  awards  (and  which  remain  outstanding  after  tax  withholding  and  payment  of  any
applicable exercise price).

C.    Board practices

Overview

Directors are expected to provide stewardship to promote the long-term success of the Company. They are expected to
fulfill  their  fiduciary  duties  and  duty  of  care  in  the  best  interests  of  the  Company,  considering  the  various  needs  of  its
stakeholders  (shareholders,  employees,  communities,  suppliers  and  clients),  providing  advice  to  and  oversight  of
management’s  activities. Within  its  responsibilities,  the  board  of  directors  oversees  the  company’s  strategic  goals;  financial
statements, control and risk management; core values, integrity and ethical standards; management and board remuneration
and  succession  planning,  among  others.  On  December  23,  2020,  and  as  amended  from  time  to  time,  the  board  of  directors
adopted  our  Corporate  Governance  Guidelines  (available  at  the  Company’s  website)  to  further  regulate  and  enhance  the
board’s corporate governance structures and processes.

Board composition

Our bye-laws and board resolutions provide that the board of directors consist of a minimum of three and a maximum of
nine members. All of our directors were elected at our annual shareholders’ meeting held on July 19, 2023. Their term expires
on the date of our next annual shareholders’ meeting, to be held in 2024. The board of directors meets regularly throughout the
year, at least on a quarterly basis.

Committees of our board of directors

 Our board of directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nomination and Corporate

Governance Committee, a Strategy & Risk Committee, a Technical Committee and a SPEED/Sustainability Committee.

116

Table of Contents

The  composition  and  responsibilities  of  each  board  committee  are  described  below.  The  Nomination  and  Corporate
Governance Committee annually considers and recommends to the board of directors the membership and the chair of each
board committee. Our board of directors may establish other committees to assist with its responsibilities.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently composed of three independent directors. The current members of the Audit Committee
are  Mr.  Robert  Bedingfield  (who  serves  as  Chairman  of  the  committee),  Mr.  Constantin  Papadimitriou  and  Ms.  Sylvia
Escovar. Mr. Robert Bedingfield is regarded as audit committee financial expert. The Nomination and Corporate Governance
Committee determined that Mr. Robert Bedingfield, Mr. Constantin Papadimitriou and Ms. Sylvia Escovar are independent, as
such term is defined under SEC rules applicable to foreign private issuers.

The  main  purposes  of  the Audit  Committee,  without  prejudice  of  any  additional  objectives  or  functions  foreseen  in  its
charter, are to assist the board of directors in its oversight of: (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and the
company’s  accounting  and  financial  reporting  processes  and  financial  statement  audits;  (ii)  the  independent  auditor’s
performance, qualifications and independence; (iii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the
company´s ethical standards; and (iv) the performance of the company´s internal audit function.

Compensation Committee

The  Compensation  Committee  is  currently  composed  of  four  independent  directors.  The  current  members  of  the
compensation  committee  are  Mr.  Constantin  Papadimitriou  (who  serves  as  Chairman  of  the  committee),  Mr.  Robert
Bedingfield, Mr. Brian F. Maxted and Mr. Somit Varma.

The main purposes of the Compensation Committee, without prejudice of any additional objectives or functions foreseen
in  its  charter,  are  to  (i)  evaluate  and  recommend  for  approval  by  the  independent  members  of  the  Board  the  remuneration,
benefits  and  incentive  compensation  arrangements  for  the  executive  officers  of  the  Company;  (ii)  establish  performance
indicators against which the executive officers of the Company will be evaluated; (iii) evaluate and review the identification,
recruitment and succession planning for the executive officers of the Company; and (iv) review and recommend to the board
of directors any changes to the remuneration of the non-executive directors of the Company.

Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee is currently composed of three independent directors. The current
members  of  the  Nomination  and  Corporate  Governance  Committee  are  Mr.  Somit  Varma  (who  serves  as  Chairman  of  the
committee since November 11, 2021), Ms. Sylvia Escovar and Mr. Robert Bedingfield.

The  main  purposes  of  the  Nomination  and  Corporate  Governance  Committee,  without  prejudice  of  any  additional
objectives or functions foreseen in its charter, are to (i) review board succession planning, including identifying and selecting
suitable board candidates in accordance with the criteria set forth in its charter and approved by the board of directors; (ii)
review and recommend to the board of directors the membership and Chair of each board Committee; (iii) develop, review
and monitor the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, processes and structures; and (iv) conduct and oversee the board
of directors’ annual evaluation process.

Strategy & Risk Committee

The Strategy & Risk Committee was created in December 2020, and is currently composed of six directors. The current
members of the Strategy & Risk Committee are Mr. James F. Park (who serves as Chairman of the committee), Mr. Constantin
Papadimitriou. Mr. Somit Varma, Mr. Brian F. Maxted, Mr. Andrés Ocampo and Mr. Carlos E. Macellari.

The  main  purposes  of  the  Strategy  and  Risk  Committee,  without  prejudice  of  any  additional  objectives  or  functions
foreseen in its Charter, are to assist the Board in (i) its oversight function of understanding the various key risks to which the
Company  is  exposed,  and  the  interlink  between  the  Company’s  strategy  and  such  risks;  and  (ii)  its  review  of  new  strategic
opportunities and transactions (including mergers, acquisitions, divestments and similar transactions).

117

Table of Contents

Technical Committee

The Technical Committee is currently composed of four directors. The current members of the technical committee are
Mr. Brian F. Maxted (who serves as Chairman of the committee), Mr. Carlos E. Macellari, Mr. James F. Park and Mr. Somit
Varma.

The main purposes of the Technical Committee, without prejudice of any additional objectives or functions foreseen in its
Charter, are to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by providing strategic oversight on specific technical matters
which  are  beyond  the  scope  or  expertise  of  non-technical  Board  members  to:  (i)  optimize  and  assure  technical  decision
making in existing assets to ensure business performance targets, as defined by the annual corporate scorecard, and long-range
plan goals are achieved, including with respect to the design, execution and delivery of the exploration and appraisal strategy
and plan, as well as the field development programs and drilling/production operations; (ii) review and advise the Board on
the  technical  analysis  of  prospective  new  ventures  and/or  in  conjunction  with  the  Strategy  and  Risk  Committee,  potential
corporate  merger  and  acquisition  opportunities,  as  and  when  required;  (iii)  provide  regular,  timely  feedback,  guidance  and
support to the management team and technical staff on all sub-surface matters to facilitate the Board processes related to work
programs and budget planning, execution and reporting, as well as people and business performance review; and (iv) review
and analyze the annual report presented by the management team in relation to the Company’s oil reserves and recommend to
the board of directors to approve its disclosure and publication.

SPEED/Sustainability Committee

The  SPEED/Sustainability  Committee  is  currently  composed  of  four  directors.  The  current  members  of  the
SPEED/Sustainability committee are Ms. Marcela Vaca (who serves as Chairman of the committee), Ms. Sylvia Escovar, Mr.
James F. Park and Mr. Andrés Ocampo.

The main purposes of the SPEED/Sustainability Committee, without prejudice of any additional objectives or functions
foreseen in its Charter, are to assist the Board in (i) its guidance and oversight function of the Company’s strategy concerning
the SPEED/Sustainability matters, including the safety of its operations, the initiatives to give back value to stakeholders, the
wellbeing  of  employees,  preservation  of  the  environment,  community  development,  and  any  other  matters  related  to
sustainability; and (ii) its review of the performance on the topics above.

Liability insurance

We maintain liability insurance coverage for all of our directors and officers, the level of which is reviewed annually.

D.    Employees

As of December 31, 2023, we had 470 employees, representing a decrease of 2.5% from December 31, 2022.

The following table sets forth a breakdown of our employees by geographic segment for the periods indicated.

Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Chile
Argentina
Corporate
Total

Year ended December 31, 
2022

2021

2023

 412
 5
 4
 27
 15
 7
 470

 388
 8
 4
 49
 24
 9
 482

 321
 3
 4
 52
 74
 9
 463

From time to time, we also utilize the services of independent contractors to perform various field and other services as
needed. As of December 31, 2023, 13 of our employees were represented by labor unions or covered by collective bargaining
agreements. We believe that relations with our employees are satisfactory.

118

   
   
   
Table of Contents

E.    Share ownership

As of March 19, 2024, members of our board of directors and our executive officers held as a group 9,906,640 of our

common shares and 17.9% of our outstanding share capital.

The  following  table  shows  the  share  ownership  of  each  member  of  our  board  of  directors  and  executive  officers  as  of

March 19, 2024.

Shareholder
James F. Park (1)
Sylvia Escovar
Robert Bedingfield
Constantin Papadimitriou
Somit Varma
Brian Maxted
Carlos Macellari
Marcela Vaca
Andrés Ocampo
Jaime Caballero Uribe
Augusto Zubillaga
James Deckelman
Rodolfo Martín Terrado
Mónica Jiménez
Agustina Wisky
Sub-total executive officers' ownership
Total

Common shares
 8,817,251
 61,610
 172,296
 73,664
 72,876
 13,816
 13,816
 12,656
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
 668,655
 9,906,640

    Percentage of 
outstanding 
common shares

 15.9 %
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
 1.2 %
 17.9 %

Indicates ownership of less than 1% of outstanding common shares.

*
(1) Held by Mr. Park directly and indirectly through GoodRock, LLC. The information set forth above and listed in the table
is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Mr. Park’s most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14,
2024. 352,400 of Mr. Park’s shares have been pledged pursuant to lending arrangements.

Certain  members  of  our  board  of  directors  have,  since  the  time  of  our  initial  public  offering  in  the  U.S.,  entered  into
certain pledges of Company securities in order to access some liquidity with respect to those shares and/or to diversify their
holdings.  On  June  29,  2021,  the  board  of  directors,  based  on  the  recommendation  of  the  Nomination  and  Corporate
Governance Committee, revised its Insider Trading Policy with respect to securities pledging and prohibited employees and
directors from pledging Company securities in any circumstance, including by purchasing Company securities on margin or
holding Company securities in a margin account. In the event that an employee or director pledged any Company securities
prior to June 29, 2021, and provided that any such pledges were made in compliance with the Insider Trading Policy of the
Company effective at the time such securities were pledged, the employee or director must terminate any such arrangements
by June 29, 2024.

F.    Disclosure of a registrant’s action to recover erroneously awarded compensation

Not applicable.

119

   
 
 
 
Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A.    Major shareholders

The  following  table  presents  the  beneficial  ownership  of  our  common  shares  as  of  March  19,  2024,  except  for  certain
shareholders  whose  last  available  data  is  as  of  December  31,  2023,  or  as  noted  below. The  percentages  reported  herein  are
based on the shares outstanding as of March 19, 2024.

Shareholder
James F. Park (1)
Compass Group LLC (2)
Renaissance Technologies LLC (3)
Socoservin Overseas SPF S.à.r.l. (4)
Cobas Asset Management, SGIIC, SA (5)
Gerald E. O’Shaughnessy (6)
Other shareholders
Total

Common shares
 8,817,251
 3,312,589
 3,091,863
 2,889,315
 2,801,544
 2,793,392
 31,764,896
 55,470,850

    Percentage of 
outstanding 
common shares  
 15.9 %
 6.0 %
 5.6 %
 5.2 %
 5.1 %
 5.0 %
 57.2 %
 100.0 %

(1) 7,305,133 shares are held by GoodRock, LLC, which is controlled by James F. Park. The information set forth above and
listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Mr. Park’s most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 14, 2024. 352,400 of Mr. Park´s shares have been pledged pursuant to lending arrangements.

(2) The  information  listed  in  the  table  is  based  solely  on  the  disclosure  set  forth  in  Compass  Group  LLC´s  most  recent

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024.

(3) The information listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Renaissance´s most recent Schedule 13G

filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.

(4) The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Socoservin Overseas’

most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on July 25, 2023.

(5) The  information  set  forth  above  and  listed  in  the  table  is  based  solely  on  the  disclosure  set  forth  in  Cobas  Asset

Management’s most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 20, 2024.

(6) Held  by  Mr.  O’Shaughnessy  directly  and  indirectly  through  GP  Investments  LLP;  GPK  Holdings,  LLC;  The  Globe
Resources Group, Inc.; and other investment vehicles. The information listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure
set forth in Mr. O´Shaughnessy’s most recent Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024. 2,700,000 of Mr. O
´Shaughnessy´s shares have been pledged pursuant to lending arrangements.

Principal shareholders do not have any different or special voting rights in comparison to any other common shareholder.

According to our transfer agent, as of March 19, 2024, we had 12 registered shareholders, out of which 6 are registered as
U.S. shareholders. Since some of the shares are held by nominees, the number of shareholders may not be representative of
the number of beneficial owners.

B.    Related party transactions

We have entered into the following transactions with related parties:

Executive Directors’ Service Agreements

We have entered into service contracts with certain of our executive directors. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management

and Employees—B. Compensation—Executive officers and director compensation—.”

For further information relating to our related party transactions and balances outstanding as of December 31, 2023, 2022

and 2021, please see Note 34 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

120

   
 
 
Table of Contents

C.    Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A.    Consolidated statements and other financial information

Financial statements

See “Item 18. Financial Statements,” which contains our audited financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Legal proceedings

From  time  to  time,  we  may  be  subject  to  various  lawsuits,  claims  and  proceedings  that  arise  in  the  normal  course  of
business, including employment, commercial, environmental, safety and health matters. For example, from time to time, we
receive  notice  of  environmental,  health  and  safety  violations.  It  is  not  presently  possible  to  determine  whether  any  such
matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

On  January  8,  2020, Amerisur  received  a  copy  of  a  claim  form  issued  in  the  High  Court  of  England  and  Wales  (the
“Court”)  by  Leigh  Day  solicitors  on  behalf  of  a  group  of  claimants  (the  “Claimants”)  described  as  members  of  a  farming
community in the department of Putumayo in Colombia, seeking compensation for economic and non-economic damages said
to be caused by alleged environmental contamination and pollution caused by Amerisur’s operations in the region. Following
initial  court  hearings,  an  interim  freezing  order  was  imposed  on Amerisur  for  a  certain  amount  of  its  assets  located  in  the
United Kingdom. On November 10, 2020, the freezing order was discharged by agreement between the parties as Amerisur
provided alternative security in the form of a letter of credit. On August 11, 2023, a settlement (the “Settlement”) was signed
between Leigh Day and Amerisur, made on a no-admission of liability basis and included a payment made by Amerisur. All
Claimants represented by Leigh Day agreed to the Settlement. On October 2, 2023, the Court approved the Settlement, the
litigation was discontinued, and the letter of credit was cancelled. For further information on the contingent liability related to
the above, please see Note 29 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Dividends and dividend policy

Holders of common shares will be entitled to receive dividends, if any, paid on the common shares.

On  March  31,  2023,  and  May  31,  2023,  we  paid  dividends  of  US$0.13  per  share,  on  September  7,  2023,  we  paid

dividends of US$0.132 per share and, on December 11, 2023, we paid dividends of US$0.134 per share.

Because we are a holding company with no direct operations, we will only be able to pay dividends from our available
cash  on  hand  and  any  funds  we  receive  from  our  subsidiaries.  The  terms  of  our  indebtedness  may  restrict  us  from  paying
dividends.

Under the Companies Act 1981, as amended of Bermuda (the “Bermuda Companies Act”), we may not declare or pay a
dividend if there are reasonable grounds for believing that we are, or would after the payment be, unable to pay our liabilities
as they become due or that the realizable value of our assets would thereafter be less than our liabilities. Under our bye-laws,
each common share is entitled to dividends if, as and when dividends are declared by our board of directors, subject to any
preferred dividend right of the holders of any preference shares, if any.

Additionally, any decision to pay dividends in the future, and the amount of any distributions, is at the discretion of our
board  of  directors  and  our  shareholders,  and  will  depend  on  many  factors,  such  as  our  results  of  operations,  financial
condition, cash requirements, prospects and other factors. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk factors—Risks related to
our common shares—Any decision to pay dividends in the future, and the amount of any distributions, is at the discretion of
our board of directors, and will depend on many factors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash

121

Table of Contents

requirements,  prospects  and  other  factors”  and  “—We  are  a  holding  company  and  our  only  material  assets  are  our  equity
interests in our operating subsidiaries and our other investments; as a result, our principal source of revenue and cash flow is
distributions from our subsidiaries; our subsidiaries may be limited by law and by contract in making distributions to us,” as
well as “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum of association and bye-laws.”

B.    Significant changes

A  discussion  of  the  significant  changes  in  our  business  can  be  found  under  “Item  4.  Information  on  the  Company—B.

Business Overview.”

ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING

A.    Offering and listing details

Not applicable.

B.    Plan of distribution

Not applicable.

C.    Markets

Our common shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GPRK” since February 7, 2014.

D.    Selling shareholders

Not applicable.

E.    Dilution

Not applicable.

F.    Expenses of the issue

Not applicable.

ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A.    Share capital

Not applicable.

B.    Memorandum of association and bye-laws

The following description of our memorandum of association and bye-laws does not purport to be complete and is subject

to, and qualified by reference to, all of the provisions of our memorandum of association and bye-laws.

General

We  are  an  exempted  company  limited  by  shares  incorporated  under  the  laws  of  Bermuda.  We  are  registered  with  the
Registrar  of  Companies  in  Bermuda  under  registration  number  33273.  The  rights  of  our  shareholders  will  be  governed  by
Bermuda law and by our memorandum of association and bye-laws. Bermuda company law differs in some material

122

Table of Contents

respects  from  the  laws  generally  applicable  to  Delaware  corporations.  Below  is  a  summary  of  some  of  those  material
differences.

Because the following statements are summaries, they do not discuss all aspects of Bermuda law that may be relevant to

us and to our shareholders.

Share capital and bye-laws

Our share capital consists of common shares only. Our authorized share capital consists of 5,171,949,000 common shares
of par value US$0.001 per share. As of March 19, 2024, there are 55,470,850 common shares outstanding. All of our issued
and  outstanding  common  shares  are  fully  paid  and  non-assessable.  We  also  have  an  employee  incentive  program  (LTIP
Employees and LTIP Executives), pursuant to which we have granted share awards to our executive officers and employees.
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

According to our bye-laws, if our share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class
(unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may, whether or not the Company is being wound-
up,  be  varied  with  the  consent  in  writing  of  the  holders  of  at  least  two-thirds  of  the  issued  shares  of  that  class  or  with  the
sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of the votes cast at a separate general meeting of the holders of the shares of the
class at which meeting the necessary quorum shall be two persons at least, in person or by proxy, holding or representing one-
third of the issued shares of the class. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class issued with preferred or
other rights shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class, be deemed to be
varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu therewith.

Our  bye-laws  give  our  board  of  directors  the  power  to  issue  any  unissued  shares  of  the  company  on  such  terms  and

conditions as it may determine, subject to the terms of the bye-laws and any resolution of the shareholders to the contrary.

Common shares

Holders of our common shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of holders of common
shares. Under our bye-laws, each common share is entitled to dividends, if, as and when dividends are declared by our board
of directors, subject to any preferred dividend right of the holders of any preference shares, if any. Holders of common shares
have no pre-emptive, redemption, conversion or sinking fund rights. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up
the holders of common shares are entitled to share equally and ratably in our assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all
of our debts and liabilities, subject to any liquidation preference on any outstanding preference shares.

Board composition

Our bye-laws provide that the minimum number of directors shall be three or such other number as shall be determined
from time to time by our board of directors. In addition, our bye-laws provide that our board of directors shall determine the
maximum size of the board. As per the meeting of the board of directors of GeoPark Limited, which took place on May 10,
2022,  the  modification  of  the  members  of  the  board  of  directors  was  approved  and  it  was  determined  that  the  maximum
number of members will be nine. Therefore, the current number of members of the Board is nine.

Election and removal of directors

Our  bye-laws  provide  that  our  directors  shall  hold  office  for  such  term  as  the  shareholders  shall  determine  or,  in  the
absence of such determination, until the next annual general meeting or until their successors are elected or appointed or their
office  is  otherwise  vacated.  Directors  whose  term  has  expired  may  offer  themselves  for  re-election  at  each  election  of  the
directors.

A director may be removed by the shareholders at any special general meeting by a resolution adopted by 65% or more of
the votes cast at the meeting, provided that notice of the shareholders meeting convened to remove the director is given to the
director. The notice must contain a statement of the intention to remove the director and must be served on

123

Table of Contents

the director not less than fourteen days before the meeting. The director is entitled to attend the meeting and be heard on the
motion for his removal.

In addition, our bye-laws provide that our board of directors may remove a director only for cause by the affirmative vote
of  at  least  three-quarters  of  the  board  of  directors,  provided  that  notice  of  any  such  meeting  convened  for  the  purpose  of
removing a director shall contain a statement of the intention to remove the director and must be served on the director not
less than fourteen days before the meeting. The director is entitled to attend the meeting and be heard on the motion for his
removal.

Any  vacancy  created  by  the  removal  of  a  director  at  a  special  general  meeting  may  be  filled  at  that  meeting  by  the
election of another director in his or her place or, in the absence of any such election, by the board of directors. Any other
vacancy, including a newly created directorship due to an increase in the maximum number of directors on our board, may be
filled by our board of directors.

Proceedings of board of directors

Our bye-laws provide that our business is to be managed and conducted by our board of directors. Our board of directors
may act by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present. The quorum
necessary for the transaction of business at meetings of the board of directors shall be the presence of a majority of the board
of directors from time to time. Our bye-laws also provide that resolutions unanimously signed by all directors are valid as if
they had been passed at a meeting of the board duly called and constituted.

Duties of directors

The Companies Act authorizes the directors of a company, subject to its bye-laws, to exercise all powers of the company
except  those  that  are  required  by  the  Companies Act  or  the  company’s  bye-laws  to  be  exercised  by  the  shareholders  of  the
company. Our bye-laws provide that our business is to be managed and conducted by our board of directors. Under Bermuda
common law, members of a board of directors owe a fiduciary duty to the Company to act in good faith in their dealings with
or  on  behalf  of  the  company,  and  to  exercise  their  powers  and  fulfill  the  duties  of  their  office  honestly.  This  duty  has  the
following  essential  elements:  (1)  a  duty  to  act  in  good  faith  in  the  best  interests  of  the  company;  (2)  a  duty  not  to  make  a
personal profit from opportunities that arise from the office of director; (3) a duty to avoid conflicts of interest; and (4) a duty
to exercise powers for the purpose for which such powers were intended. The Bermuda Companies Act also imposes a duty on
directors  (and  officers)  of  a  Bermuda  company,  to  act  honestly  and  in  good  faith,  with  a  view  to  the  best  interests  of  the
company,  and  to  exercise  the  care,  diligence  and  skill  that  a  reasonably  prudent  person  would  exercise  in  comparable
circumstances. In addition, the Companies Act imposes various duties on directors (and officers) of a company with respect to
certain matters of management and administration of the company. Under Bermuda law, directors (and officers) generally owe
fiduciary duties to the company itself, not to the company’s individual shareholders, creditors or any class thereof.

The Companies Act provides that in any proceedings for negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust against any
director, if it appears to a court that such officer is or may be liable in respect of the negligence, default, breach of duty or
breach  of  trust,  but  that  he  has  acted  honestly  and  reasonably,  and  that,  having  regard  to  all  the  circumstances  of  the  case,
including those connected with his appointment, he ought fairly to be excused for the negligence, default, breach of duty or
breach of trust, that court may relieve him, either wholly or partly, from any liability on such terms as the court may think fit.

By comparison, under Delaware law, the business and affairs of a corporation are managed by or under the direction of its
board of directors. In exercising their powers, directors are charged with a duty of care and a duty of loyalty. The duty of care
requires that directors act in an informed and deliberate manner and to inform themselves, prior to making a business decision,
of all relevant material information reasonably available to them. The duty of care also requires that directors exercise care in
overseeing the conduct of corporate employees. The duty of loyalty is the duty to act in good faith, not out of self-interest, and
in  a  manner  which  the  director  reasonably  believes  to  be  in  the  best  interests  of  the  shareholders. A  party  challenging  the
propriety  of  a  decision  of  a  board  of  directors  bears  the  burden  of  rebutting  the  presumptions  afforded  to  directors  by  the
“business judgment rule.” If the presumption is not rebutted, the business

124

Table of Contents

judgment rule attaches to protect the directors and their decisions. Where, however, the presumption is rebutted, the directors
bear  the  burden  of  demonstrating  the  fairness  of  the  relevant  transaction.  Notwithstanding  the  foregoing,  Delaware  courts
subject directors’ conduct to enhanced scrutiny in respect of defensive actions taken in response to a threat to corporate control
and approval of a transaction resulting in a sale of control of the corporation.

Interested directors

Pursuant  to  our  bye-laws,  a  director  shall  declare  the  nature  of  his  interest  in  any  contract  or  arrangement  with  the
company as required by the Companies Act. A director so interested shall not, except in particular circumstances set out in our
bye-laws, be entitled to vote or be counted in the quorum at a meeting in relation to any resolution in which he has an interest,
which  is  to  his  knowledge,  a  material  interest  (otherwise  than  by  virtue  of  his  interest  in  shares  or  debentures  or  other
securities of the company). A director will be liable to us for any secret profit realized from the transaction. In contrast, under
Delaware law, such a contract or arrangement is voidable unless it is approved by a majority of disinterested directors or by a
vote of shareholders, in each case if the material facts as to the interested director’s relationship or interests are disclosed or
are known to the disinterested directors or shareholders, or such contract or arrangement is fair to the corporation as of the
time  it  is  approved  or  ratified.  Additionally,  such  interested  director  could  be  held  liable  for  a  transaction  in  which  such
director derived an improper personal benefit.

Indemnification of directors and officers

Section 98 of the Companies Act provides generally that a Bermuda company may indemnify its directors, officers and
auditors  against  any  liability  which  by  virtue  of  any  rule  of  law  would  otherwise  be  imposed  on  them  in  respect  of  any
negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, except in cases where such liability arises from fraud or dishonesty of
which such director, officer or auditor may be guilty in relation to the company. Section 98 further provides that a Bermuda
company  may  indemnify  its  directors,  officers  and  auditors  against  any  liability  incurred  by  them  in  defending  any
proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is awarded in their favour or in which they are acquitted or granted
relief by the Supreme Court of Bermuda pursuant to section 281 of the Companies Act.

We have adopted provisions in our bye-laws that provide that we shall indemnify our officers and directors in respect of
their actions and omissions, except in respect of their fraud or dishonesty, or to recover any gain, personal profit or advantage
to which such director is not legally entitled. Our bye-laws provide that the shareholders waive all claims or rights of action
that they might have, individually or in right of the company, against any of the company’s directors for any act or failure to
act in the performance of such director’s duties, except in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of such director. Section 98A of
the Companies Act permits us to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any officer or director in respect of any
loss or liability attaching to him in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, whether or not we may
otherwise  indemnify  such  officer  or  director. We  have  purchased  and  maintain  a  directors’  and  officers’  liability  policy  for
such a purpose.

Meetings of shareholders

Under Bermuda law, the company is required to convene at least one general meeting of shareholders each calendar year
(the “annual general meeting”). However, the members may by resolution waive this requirement, either for a specific year or
period  of  time,  or  indefinitely.  When  the  requirement  has  been  so  waived,  any  member  may,  on  notice  to  the  company,
terminate the waiver, in which case an annual general meeting must be called.

Bermuda  law  provides  that  a  special  general  meeting  of  shareholders  may  be  called  by  the  board  of  directors  of  a
company and must be called upon the request of shareholders holding not less than 10% of the paid-up capital of the company
carrying the right to vote at general meetings. Bermuda law also requires that shareholders be given at least five days' advance
notice of a general meeting, but the accidental omission to give notice to any person does not invalidate the proceedings at a
meeting.

Our bye-laws provide that our board of directors may convene an annual general meeting or a special general meeting.
Under our bye-laws, not less than fifteen nor more than sixty days' notice of an annual general meeting or a special general
meeting must be given to each shareholder entitled to vote at such meeting. This notice requirement is subject to the ability

125

Table of Contents

to  hold  such  meetings  on  shorter  notice  if  such  notice  is  agreed:  (i)  in  the  case  of  an  annual  general  meeting  by  all  of  the
shareholders  entitled  to  attend  and  vote  at  such  meeting;  or  (ii)  in  the  case  of  a  special  general  meeting  by  a  majority  in
number of the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the meeting holding not less than 95% in nominal value of the shares
entitled to vote at such meeting. The quorum required for a general meeting of shareholders is two or more persons present in
person and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued voting shares in the Company throughout
the meeting, provided that if the Company shall at any time have only one shareholder, one shareholder present in person or
by proxy shall form the quorum. Unless otherwise required by law or by our bye-laws, shareholder action requires a resolution
adopted by the affirmative votes of a majority of votes cast by shareholders at a general meeting at which a quorum is present.

Shareholder proposals

Under Bermuda law, shareholders holding at least 5% of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having at the date
of  the  requisition  a  right  to  vote  at  the  meeting  to  which  the  requisition  relates  or  any  group  composed  of  at  least  100
shareholders may require a proposal to be submitted to an annual general meeting of shareholders by giving a requisition in
writing  to  the  company.  Under  our  bye-laws,  any  shareholders  wishing  to  nominate  a  person  for  election  as  a  director  or
propose business to be transacted at a meeting of shareholders must provide (among other things) advance notice, as set out in
our bye-laws. Shareholders may only propose a person for election as a director at an annual general meeting.

Shareholder action by written consent

Our bye-laws provide that, except for the removal of auditors and directors, any actions which shareholders may take at a
general  meeting  of  shareholders  may  be  taken  by  the  shareholders  through  the  unanimous  written  consent  of  all  the
shareholders who would be entitled to vote on the matter at the general meeting.

Amendment of memorandum of association and bye-laws

Our memorandum of association and bye-laws may be amended with the approval of a majority of our board of directors
and by a resolution by a majority of the votes cast by shareholders who (being entitled to do so) vote in person or by proxy at
any general meeting of the shareholders in accordance with the provisions of the bye-laws.

Under Bermuda law, the holders of an aggregate of not less than 20% in par value of the company's issued share capital or
any  class  thereof  have  the  right  to  apply  to  the  Supreme  Court  of  Bermuda  for  an  annulment  of  any  amendment  of  the
memorandum  of  association  adopted  by  shareholders  at  any  general  meeting,  other  than  an  amendment  which  alters  or
reduces  a  company's  share  capital  as  provided  in  the  Companies Act.  Where  such  an  application  is  made,  the  amendment
becomes  effective  only  to  the  extent  that  it  is  confirmed  by  the  Bermuda  court.  An  application  for  an  annulment  of  an
amendment of the memorandum of association must be made within twenty-one days after the date on which the resolution
altering  the  company's  memorandum  of  association  is  passed  and  may  be  made  on  behalf  of  persons  entitled  to  make  the
application by one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose. No application may be made by
shareholders voting in favour of the amendment.

Business combinations

The amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation (other than certain affiliated
companies) requires the amalgamation or merger agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and by its
shareholders.  Under  the  Companies  Act,  unless  the  company’s  bye-laws  provide  otherwise,  the  approval  of  75%  of  the
shareholders voting at a meeting is required to pass a resolution to approve the amalgamation or merger agreement, and the
quorum  for  such  meeting  must  be  two  persons  holding  or  representing  more  than  one-third  of  the  issued  shares  of  the
company. Our bye-laws provide that an amalgamation or merger will require the approval of our board of directors and of our
shareholders by a resolution adopted by 65% or more of the votes cast by shareholders who (being entitled to do so) vote in
person  or  by  proxy  at  any  general  meeting  of  the  shareholders  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  bye-laws.  Under
Bermuda  law,  in  the  event  of  an  amalgamation  or  merger  of  a  Bermuda  company  with  another  company  or  corporation,  a
shareholder who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or merger and who is not satisfied that fair value

126

Table of Contents

has been offered for such shareholder’s shares may, within one month of the notice of the shareholders meeting, apply to the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to appraise the value of those shares.

Our bye-laws provide that the directors shall manage the business of the Company and may exercise all such powers as
are not, by the Companies Act or by the bye-laws, required to be exercised by the Company in general meeting and may pay
all expenses incurred in promoting and incorporating the company and may exercise all the powers of the Company including,
but not by way of limitation, the power to borrow money and to mortgage or charge all or any part of the undertaking property
and  assets  (present  and  future)  and  uncalled  capital  of  the  Company  and  to  issue  debentures  and  other  securities,  whether
outright or as security for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or any third party.

Compulsory Acquisition of Shares Held by Minority Holders

An  acquiring  party  is  generally  able  to  acquire  compulsorily  the  common  shares  of  minority  holders  in  the  following

ways:

(1) By a procedure under the Companies Act 1981 known as a “scheme of arrangement”. A scheme of arrangement could
be  effected  by  obtaining  the  agreement  of  the  company  and  of  holders  of  common  shares,  representing  in  the  aggregate  a
majority in number and at least 75% in value of the common shareholders present and voting at a court ordered meeting held
to consider the scheme of arrangement. The scheme of arrangement must then be sanctioned by the Bermuda Supreme Court.
If  a  scheme  of  arrangement  receives  all  necessary  agreements  and  sanctions,  upon  the  filing  of  the  court  order  with  the
Registrar of Companies in Bermuda, all holders of common shares could be compelled to sell their shares under the terms of
the scheme of arrangement.

(2) If the acquiring party is a company it may compulsorily acquire all the shares of the target company, by acquiring
pursuant to a tender offer 90% of the shares or class of shares not already owned by, or by a nominee for, the acquiring party
(the offeror), or any of its subsidiaries. If an offeror has, within four months after the making of an offer for all the shares or
class of shares not owned by, or by a nominee for, the offeror, or any of its subsidiaries, obtained the approval of the holders of
90% or more of all the shares to which the offer relates, the offeror may, at any time within two months beginning with the
date on which the approval was obtained, require by notice any nontendering shareholder to transfer its shares on the same
terms as the original offer. In those circumstances, nontendering shareholders will be compelled to sell their shares unless the
Supreme  Court  of  Bermuda  (on  application  made  within  a  one-month  period  from  the  date  of  the  offeror's  notice  of  its
intention to acquire such shares) orders otherwise.

(3) Where one or more parties holds not less than 95% of the shares or a class of shares of a company, such holder(s) may,
pursuant  to  a  notice  given  to  the  remaining  shareholders  or  class  of  shareholders,  acquire  the  shares  of  such  remaining
shareholders or class of shareholders. When this notice is given, the acquiring party is entitled and bound to acquire the shares
of the remaining shareholders on the terms set out in the notice, unless a remaining shareholder, within one month of receiving
such notice, applies to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an appraisal of the value of their shares. This provision only applies
where the acquiring party offers the same terms to all holders of shares whose shares are being acquired.

Dividends and repurchase of shares

Pursuant to our bye-laws, our board of directors has the authority to declare dividends and authorize the repurchase of
shares subject to applicable law. Under Bermuda law, a company may not declare or pay a dividend if there are reasonable
grounds for believing that the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or
the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than its liabilities. Under Bermuda law, a company cannot purchase its
own shares if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company is, or after the repurchase would be, unable to pay
its liabilities as they become due.

Shareholder suits

Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under Bermuda law. The Bermuda courts,

however, would ordinarily be expected to permit a shareholder to commence an action in the name of a company

127

Table of Contents

to remedy a wrong to the company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company
or  illegal,  or  would  result  in  the  violation  of  the  company’s  memorandum  of  association  or  bye-laws.  Furthermore,
consideration  would  be  given  by  a  Bermuda  court  to  acts  that  are  alleged  to  constitute  a  fraud  against  the  minority
shareholders or, for instance, where an act requires the approval of a greater percentage of the company’s shareholders than
that which actually approved it.

When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of some
part of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda, which may make such order
as it sees fit, including an order regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future or ordering the purchase of the
shares of any shareholders by other shareholders or by the company.

Our bye-laws contain a provision by virtue of which our shareholders waive any claim or right of action that they may
have,  both  individually  and  on  our  behalf,  against  any  director  in  relation  to  any  action  or  failure  to  take  action  by  such
director, including the breach of any fiduciary duty by a director, except in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of such director
or to recover any gain, personal profit or advantage to which such director is not legally entitled.

Comparison of Bermuda law to Delaware corporate law

Bermuda law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and might afford less protection to shareholders.

Our  shareholders  could  have  more  difficulty  protecting  their  interests  than  would  shareholders  of  a  corporation
incorporated  in  a  jurisdiction  of  the  United  States.  As  a  Bermuda  company,  we  are  governed  by  our  memorandum  of
association  and  bye-laws  and  Bermuda  company  law. The  provisions  of  the  Companies Act,  which  applies  to  us,  differs  in
some material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and shareholders, including the provisions relating
to  interested  directors,  mergers  and  acquisitions,  takeovers,  shareholder  lawsuits  and  indemnification  of  directors.  Set  forth
below is a summary of these provisions, as well as modifications adopted pursuant to our bye-laws, which differ in certain
respects from provisions of Delaware corporate law. Our shareholders approved the adoption of our bye-laws with effect on
February 19, 2014, and amended with effect on July 15, 2021. Because the following statements are summaries, they do not
discuss all aspects of Bermuda law that may be relevant to us and our shareholders.

Interested Directors. Under our bye-laws and the Companies Act, a director shall declare the nature of his interest in any
contract  or  arrangement  with  the  company.  Our  bye-laws  further  provide  that  a  director  so  interested  shall  not,  except  in
particular circumstances, be entitled to vote or be counted in the quorum at a meeting in relation to any resolution in which he
has an interest, which is to his knowledge, a material interest (otherwise than by virtue of his interest in shares or debentures
or  other  securities  of  the  company). A  director  will  be  liable  to  us  for  any  secret  profit  realized  from  the  transaction.  See
“Item 10—B. Memorandum of association and bye-laws—Interested directors.”

Amalgamations,  Mergers  and  Similar Arrangements.  Pursuant  to  the  Companies Act,  the  amalgamation  or  merger  of  a
Bermuda company with another company or corporation (other than certain affiliates) requires the amalgamation or merger
agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and by its shareholders. Under our bye-laws, an amalgamation
or merger will require the approval of our board of directors and our shareholders by Special Resolution, which is a resolution
adopted by 65% of more of the votes cast by shareholders who (being entitled to do so) vote in person or by proxy at any
general  meeting  of  the  shareholders  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  bye-laws.  The  quorum  for  any  such  general
meeting  must  be  two  or  more  persons,  in  person  or  by  proxy,  representing  more  than  one-third  of  the  issued  shares  of  the
company. Under Bermuda law, in the event of an amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company or
corporation, a shareholder who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or merger and who is not satisfied that fair value has
been offered for such shareholders shares may, within one month of notice of the shareholders meeting, apply to the Supreme
Court of Bermuda to appraise the fair value of those shares.

Under  Delaware  law,  with  certain  exceptions,  a  merger,  consolidation  or  sale  of  all  or  substantially  all  the  assets  of  a
corporation must be approved by the board of directors and a majority of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote
thereon. Under Delaware law, a shareholder of a corporation participating in certain major corporate transactions may, under
certain circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights pursuant to which such shareholder may receive cash in the

128

Table of Contents

amount of the fair value of the shares held by such shareholder (as determined by a court) in lieu of the consideration such
shareholder would otherwise receive in the transaction.

Shareholders’ Suit. Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under Bermuda law.
The Bermuda courts, however, would ordinarily be expected to permit a shareholder to commence an action in the name of a
company to remedy a wrong to the company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the
company  or  illegal,  or  would  result  in  the  violation  of  the  company’s  memorandum  of  association  or  bye-laws.  When  the
affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of some part of the
shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda, which may make such order as it sees
fit, including an order regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future or ordering the purchase of the shares of
any  shareholders  by  other  shareholders  or  by  the  company.  See  “Item  10—B.  Memorandum  of  association  and  bye-laws—
Shareholder suits.”

Our bye-laws contain a provision by virtue of which our shareholders waive any claim or right of action that they might
have,  individually  or  in  the  right  of  the  company,  against  any  director  for  any  act  or  failure  to  act  in  performance  of  such
director’s duties, including the breach of any fiduciary duty, except in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of such director or to
recover  any  gain,  personal  profit  or  advantage  to  which  such  director  is  not  legally  entitled.  Class  actions  and  derivative
actions generally are available to shareholders under Delaware law for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate
waste and actions not taken in accordance with applicable law. In such actions, the court has discretion to permit the winning
party to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action.

Indemnification of Directors. We may indemnify our directors and officers in their capacity as directors or officers for any
loss arising or liability attaching to them by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or
breach of trust of which a director or officer may be guilty in relation to the company other than in respect of his own fraud or
dishonesty. See “Item 10—B. Memorandum of association and bye-laws—Enforcement of Judgments.” Our bye-laws provide
that  we  shall  indemnify  our  officers  and  directors  in  respect  of  their  acts  and  omissions,  except  in  respect  of  their  fraud  or
dishonesty,  or  to  recover  any  gain,  personal  profit  or  advantage  to  which  such  Director  is  not  legally  entitled,  and  (by
incorporation of the provisions of the Companies Act) that we may advance money to our officers and directors for the costs,
charges and expenses incurred by our officers and directors in defending any civil or criminal proceedings against them on
condition  that  the  directors  and  officers  repay  the  money  if  any  allegations  of  fraud  or  dishonesty  is  proved  against  them
provided, however, that, if the Companies Act requires, an advancement of expenses shall be made only upon delivery to the
Company of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such indemnitee, to repay all amounts if it shall ultimately be determined by
final  judicial  decision  that  such  indemnitee  is  not  entitled  to  be  indemnified  for  such  expenses  under  our  bye-laws  or
otherwise.  Under  Delaware  law,  a  corporation  may  indemnify  a  director  or  officer  of  the  corporation  against  expenses
(including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in defense of an
action, suit or proceeding by reason of such position if such director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he or she
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, such director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. In addition, we have
entered into customary indemnification agreements with our directors.

As a result of these differences, investors could have more difficulty protecting their interests than would shareholders of

a corporation incorporated in the United States.

Tax  matters.  Under  current  Bermuda  law,  we  are  not  subject  to  tax  on  income  or  capital  gains  in  Bermuda.  We  have
obtained an assurance from the Minister of Finance of Bermuda under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966
that, in the event that any legislation is enacted in Bermuda imposing any tax computed on profits, income, any capital asset,
gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance, such tax shall not be applicable to us or to any of
our operations or shares, debentures or other obligations, until March 31, 2035, except insofar as such tax applies to persons
ordinarily  resident  in  Bermuda  or  is  payable  by  us  in  respect  of  real  property  owned  or  leased  by  us  in  Bermuda.  On
December  27,  2023,  Bermuda  enacted  the  Corporate  Income Tax Act  2023  (the  “CIT Act”). The  CIT Act  provides  for  the
taxation of the Bermuda constituent entities of multi-national groups that excess EUR 750 million revenue for at least two of
the last four fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2025. We are incorporated in Bermuda as an exempted company and
pay annual Bermuda government fees. In addition, all entities employing individuals in Bermuda

129

Table of Contents

are required to pay a payroll tax and there are other sundry taxes payable, directly or indirectly, to the Bermuda government.
Neither we nor our Bermuda subsidiaries employ individuals in Bermuda as at the date of this annual report.

Access to books and records and dissemination of information

Members of the general public have a right to inspect the public documents of a company available at the office of the
Registrar  of  Companies  in  Bermuda.  These  documents  include  the  company’s  memorandum  of  association,  including  its
objects and powers, and certain alterations to the memorandum of association. The shareholders have the additional right to
inspect the bye-laws of the company, minutes of general meetings and the company’s audited financial statements, which must
be presented to the annual general meeting. The register of members of a company is also open to inspection by shareholders
and by members of the general public without charge. The register of members is required to be open for inspection for not
less than two hours in any business day (subject to the ability of a company to close the register of members for not more than
thirty days in a year). A company is required to maintain its share register in Bermuda but may, subject to the provisions of the
Companies Act, establish a branch register outside of Bermuda. A company is required to keep at its registered office a register
of directors and officers that is open for inspection for not less than two hours in any business day by members of the public
without charge. A company is also required to file with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda a list of its directors to be
maintained on a register, which register will be available for public inspection subject to such conditions as the Registrar may
impose  and  on  payment  of  such  fee  as  may  be  prescribed.  Bermuda  law  does  not,  however,  provide  a  general  right  for
shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other corporate records.

Registrar or transfer agent

A register of holders of the common shares is maintained by Conyers Corporate Services (Bermuda) Limited in Bermuda,
and  a  branch  register  is  maintained  in  the  United  States  by  Computershare  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  who  serves  as  branch
registrar and transfer agent.

Enforcement of Judgments

We are incorporated as an exempted company limited by shares under the laws of Bermuda, and substantially all of our
assets are located in Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Argentina. In addition, most of our directors and executive officers reside
outside the United States, and all or a substantial portion of the assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As
a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process on those persons in the United States or to enforce in the
United States judgments obtained in U.S. courts against us or those persons based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S.
securities laws.

There  is  no  treaty  in  force  between  the  United  States  and  Bermuda  providing  for  the  reciprocal  recognition  and
enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. However, the courts of Bermuda would recognize any final and
conclusive  monetary  in  personam  judgement  obtained  in  a  U.S.  court  (other  than  a  sum  of  money  payable  in  respect  of
multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) and would give a judgement
based  thereon  provided  that  (i)  the  U.S.  court  that  entered  the  judgment  is  recognized  by  the  Bermuda  court  as  having
jurisdiction over us or our directors and officers, as determined by reference to Bermuda conflict of law rules, (ii) such court
did not contravene the rules of natural justice of Bermuda, such judgment was not obtained by fraud, the enforcement of the
judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of Bermuda, (iii) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is
submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of Bermuda, and (iv) there is due compliance with the correct
procedures under the laws of Bermuda.

An action brought pursuant to a public or penal law, the purpose of which is the enforcement of a sanction, power or right
at the instance of the state in its sovereign capacity, may not be entertained by a Bermuda court. Certain remedies available
under the laws of U.S. jurisdictions, including certain remedies under U.S. federal securities laws, may not be available under
Bermuda law or enforceable in a Bermuda court, as they may be contrary to Bermuda public policy. Further, no claim may be
brought in Bermuda against us or our directors and officers in the first instance for violations of U.S. federal securities laws
because  these  laws  have  no  extraterritorial  jurisdiction  under  Bermuda  law  and  do  not  have  force  of  law  in  Bermuda.  A
Bermuda court may, however, impose civil liability on us or our directors and officers if the

130

Table of Contents

facts  alleged  in  a  complaint  constitute  or  give  rise  to  a  cause  of  action  under  Bermuda  law.  However,  section  281  of  the
Companies Act allows a Bermuda court, in certain circumstances, to relieve officers and directors of Bermuda companies of
liability for acts of negligence, breach of duty or trust or other defaults.

C.    Material contracts

See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Significant Agreements.”

D.    Exchange controls

Not applicable.

E.    Taxation

The  following  summary  contains  a  description  of  certain  Bermudian,  U.S.  federal  income,  Colombian  and  Chilean  tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares. The summary is based upon the tax laws of
Bermuda,  the  United  States,  Colombia  and  Chile,  and  regulations  thereunder  as  of  the  date  hereof,  which  are  subject  to
change.

Bermuda tax consideration

At  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  there  is  no  Bermuda  income  or  profits  tax,  withholding  tax,  capital  gains  tax,  capital
transfer  tax,  estate  duty  or  inheritance  tax  payable  by  us  or  by  our  shareholders  in  respect  of  our  common  shares.  On
December  27,  2023,  Bermuda  enacted  the  Corporate  Income Tax Act  2023  (the  “CIT Act”). The  CIT Act  provides  for  the
taxation of the Bermuda constituent entities of multi-national groups that excess EUR 750 million revenue for at least two of
the last four fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2025. We have obtained an assurance from the Minister of Finance of
Bermuda  under  the  Exempted  Undertakings  Tax  Protection  Act  1966  that,  in  the  event  that  any  legislation  is  enacted  in
Bermuda imposing any tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation or any tax in
the  nature  of  estate  duty  or  inheritance  tax,  such  tax  shall  not,  until  March  31,  2035,  be  applicable  to  us  or  to  any  of  our
operations or to our common shares, debentures or other obligations except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily
resident in Bermuda or is payable by us in respect of real property owned or leased by us in Bermuda.

Material U.S. federal income tax considerations

The following is a description of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of
owning and disposing of our common shares. This discussion is not a comprehensive description of all tax considerations that
may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold our common shares. This discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder
that holds our common shares as capital assets for tax purposes. In addition, it does not describe all of the tax consequences
that may be relevant in light of the U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including alternative minimum tax and Medicare
contribution tax consequences and differing tax consequences applicable to a U.S. Holder subject to special rules, such as:

● certain financial institutions;

● a dealer or trader in securities who uses a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;

● a  person  holding  common  shares  as  part  of  a  straddle,  wash  sale  or  conversion  transaction  or  entering  into  a

constructive sale with respect to the common shares;

● a person whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

● a partnership or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

131

Table of Contents

● a tax-exempt entity, including an “individual retirement account” or “Roth IRA;”

● a person that owns or is deemed to own 10% or more of our shares by vote or value;

● a  person  who  acquired  our  shares  pursuant  to  the  exercise  of  an  employee  stock  option  or  otherwise  as

compensation; or

● a person holding common shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States.

If an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds common shares, the U.S. federal
income  tax  treatment  of  a  partner  will  generally  depend  on  the  status  of  the  partner  and  the  activities  of  the  partnership.
Partnerships  holding  common  shares  and  partners  in  such  partnerships  should  consult  their  tax  advisers  as  to  the  particular
U.S. federal income tax consequences of their investment in our common shares.

This  discussion  is  based  on  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  of  1986,  as  amended  (the  “Code”),  administrative
pronouncements, judicial decisions, and final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof, any of
which is subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers concerning the U.S.
federal,  state,  local  and  foreign  tax  consequences  of  owning  and  disposing  of  our  common  shares  in  their  particular
circumstances.

A “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our common shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is:

·

·

·

a citizen or individual resident of the United States;

a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States,
any state therein or the District of Columbia; or

an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.

This discussion assumes that we are not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, as described below.

Taxation of distributions

Distributions paid on our common shares, other than certain pro rata distributions of common shares, will generally be
treated as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal
income  tax  principles).  Because  we  do  not  maintain  calculations  of  our  earnings  and  profits  under  U.S.  federal  income  tax
principles,  it  is  expected  that  distributions  will  generally  be  reported  to  U.S.  Holders  as  dividends.  Subject  to  the  passive
foreign investment company rules described below, dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations to certain non-corporate
U.S. Holders may be taxable at favorable rates. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect
to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as the NYSE
where our common shares are traded. Non-corporate U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine whether the
favorable rate will apply to dividends they receive and whether they are subject to any special rules that limit their ability to be
taxed at this favorable rate.

A dividend generally will be included in a U.S. Holder’s income when received, will be treated as foreign-source income
to U.S. Holders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally available to U.S. corporations under
the Code with respect to dividends paid by domestic corporations.

Sale or other taxable disposition of common shares

Gain or loss realized on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares will be capital gain or loss, and will be

long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held our common shares for more than one year. Long-term capital

132

Table of Contents

gain  of  a  non-corporate  U.S.  Holder  is  generally  taxed  at  preferential  rates. The  deductibility  of  capital  losses  is  subject  to
limitations. The amount of the gain or loss will equal the difference between the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common shares
disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition. If a non-U.S. tax is withheld on the sale or disposition of common
shares,  a  U.S.  Holder’s  amount  realized  will  include  the  gross  amount  of  the  proceeds  of  the  sale  or  disposition  before
deduction  of  the  non-U.S.  tax.  Gain  or  loss  will  generally  be  U.S.-source  gain  or  loss  for  foreign  tax  credit  purposes.  U.S.
Holders should consult their tax advisers as to whether the non-U.S. tax on gains may be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s
U.S. federal income tax on foreign-source income from other sources.

The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex. For example, under applicable Treasury regulations, in the absence
of an election to apply the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty, in order for a non-U.S. income tax to be creditable, the
foreign  jurisdiction’s  income  tax  rules  must  be  consistent  with  certain  U.S.  federal  income  tax  principles,  and  we  have  not
determined whether the Chilean or Colombian income tax system meets all these requirements. The IRS has released notices
that provide relief from certain of the provisions of the Treasury regulations described above for taxable years ending before
the date that a notice or other guidance withdrawing or modifying the temporary relief is issued (or any later date specified in
such notice or other guidance). With regards to the possible application of the Chilean or Colombian tax on transfers of shares,
described under "—Chilean tax on transfers of shares" and "—Colombian tax on transfers of shares" below, respectively, you
generally will not be entitled to claim a foreign tax credit for any Chilean or Colombian taxes imposed on gains from taxable
dispositions of our common shares (although it is possible that such taxes may reduce the amount realized on the disposition).
The US-Chile income tax treaty and accompanying protocol (together, the “Treaty”) entered into force on December 19, 2023.
If you qualify for the benefits of the Treaty, with respect to taxes withheld at source, the Treaty will have effect for amounts
paid or credited on or after February 1, 2024. For all other taxes, the Treaty will have effect for taxable periods beginning on
or after January 1, 2024. The rules governing foreign tax credits and the application of the Treaty are complex and, therefore,
you  should  consult  your  own  tax  adviser  regarding  the  creditability  or  deductibility  of  any  Chilean  or  Colombian  tax  on
disposition  gains  (including  any  applicable  limitations)  and  the  determination  of  the  amount  realized  in  your  particular
circumstances.

Passive foreign investment company rules

We believe that we were not a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for
2023,  and  we  do  not  expect  to  be  a  PFIC  in  the  foreseeable  future.  However,  because  the  composition  of  our  income  and
assets will vary over time, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year. The determination of
whether we are a PFIC is made annually and is based upon the composition of our income and assets (including the income
and assets of, among others, entities in which we hold at least a 25% interest), and the nature of our activities.

If we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held our common shares, gain recognized by a U.S.
Holder on a sale or other disposition (including certain pledges) of our common shares would generally be allocated ratably
over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other
disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other
taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations for that year, as appropriate,
and an interest charge would be imposed on the tax on such amount. Further, to the extent that any distribution received by a
U.S. Holder on its common shares exceeds 125% of the average of the annual distributions on the shares received during the
preceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter, that distribution would be subject to taxation
in  the  same  manner  as  gain,  as  described  immediately  above.  Certain  elections  may  be  available  that  would  result  in
alternative  treatments  (such  as  mark-to-market  treatment)  of  our  common  shares.  U.S.  Holders  should  consult  their  tax
advisers to determine whether any of these elections would be available and, if so, what the consequences of the alternative
treatments would be in their particular circumstances.

Furthermore, if we were a PFIC or, with respect to a particular U.S. Holder, were treated as a PFIC for the taxable year in
which we paid a dividend or the prior taxable year, the preferential dividend rates discussed above with respect to dividends
paid to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders would not apply.

133

Table of Contents

Information reporting and backup withholding

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial
intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting, and may be subject to backup withholding, unless (1) the U.S.
Holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (2) in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct
taxpayer  identification  number  and  certifies  that  it  is  not  subject  to  backup  withholding.  The  amount  of  any  backup
withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax
liability  and  may  entitle  it  to  a  refund,  provided  that  the  required  information  is  timely  furnished  to  the  Internal  Revenue
Service.

Chilean tax on transfers of shares

As  provided  in  Decree  Law  No.  824  of  1974,  income  tax  is  triggered  on  the  indirect  transfer  of  shares,  equity  rights,
interests or other rights in the equity, control or profits of a Chilean entity as well as transfers of other assets and property of
permanent  establishments  or  other  businesses  in  Chile.  Reforms  introduced  in  2014  imposed  a  measure  which  obliges  the
company from which shares are transferred to pay taxes if the entity which undertakes the transfer of shares fails to do so.

The indirect transfer rules apply to sales of shares of an entity:

● If  such  entity  is  an  offshore  holding  company  located  in  a  black-listed  tax  haven  jurisdiction  as  determined  by
Chilean  tax  law,  or  a  black-listed  jurisdiction,  (such  as  Bermuda)  that  holds  Chilean Assets;  and  either  a  Chilean
resident holds 5% or more of such entity, or such entity’s rights to equity, control or profits, or 50% or more of such
entity’s rights to equity or profits are held by residents in black-listed jurisdictions; or

● the shares or rights transferred represent 10% or more of the offshore holding company (considering dispositions by
related persons and over the preceding 12-month period) and the underlying Chilean Assets indirectly transferred, in
the  proportion  indirectly  owned  by  the  seller,  (a)  are  valued  in  an  amount  equal  to  or  higher  than  UTA  210,000
(approximately US$200 million) (adjusted by the Chilean inflation unit of reference) or (b) represent 20% or more of
the market value of the interest held by such seller in such offshore holding company.

Based on information available to us, (i) no Chilean resident holds 5% or more of our rights to equity, control or profits;
(ii) residents in black-listed jurisdictions do not hold 50% or more of our rights to equity, control or profits; (iii) the Chilean
Assets  are  not  valued  at  more  than  UTA  210,000;  and  (iv)  the  Chilean Assets  do  not  represent  20%  or  more  of  the  market
value of the offshore holding companies. Therefore, we do not believe the indirect transfer rules will apply to transfers of our
common  shares,  unless  the  shares  or  rights  transferred  represent  10%  or  more  of  the  company  and  the  other  conditions
described above are met (considering dispositions by related persons and over the preceding 12-month period).

However, there can be no assurance that, at any time in the future, a Chilean resident will not hold 5% or more of our
rights  to  equity,  control  or  profits  or  that  residents  in  black-listed  jurisdictions  will  not  hold  50%  or  more  of  our  rights  to
equity, control or profits. If this were to occur, all sales of our common shares would be subject to the indirect transfer tax
referred to above.

Our expectations regarding the indirect transfer rules are based on our understandings, analysis and interpretation of these
enacted indirect transfer rules, which are subject to additional interpretation and rule-making by the Chilean authorities. As
such, there is uncertainty relating to the application by Chilean authorities of the indirect transfer rules on us.

Colombian tax on transfers of shares

In August 2020, the Colombian government enacted Decree 1103 that regulates the indirect transfer tax set in article 90-3

of the Colombian Tax Code. Through this regulation, the transfer of shares and assets of entities located abroad are

134

Table of Contents

taxed  in  Colombia  when  such  transaction  represents  a  transfer  of  underlying  assets  located  in  Colombia. The  latter  applies
unless (i) shares transferred are listed on a stock exchange recognized by the Colombian Government and no more than 20%
of such shares are owned by a single beneficiary; or (ii) the value of assets indirectly transferred represents less than 20% of
book and/or fair market value of all assets owned by the non-resident entity transferor.

For income tax purposes, indirect transfer shall be assessed at fair market value of the Colombian underlying assets and
the relevant tax basis is the one held in the underlying Colombian asset, which should be calculated based on the Colombian
Tax Code rules. When the underlying assets are held by a Colombian branch, any taxable base determined shall be allocated
first to amortization/depreciation recapture taxed as ordinary income.

When  a  subsequent  indirect  transfer  is  made,  the  tax  basis  of  the  underlying  Colombian  assets  corresponds  to  the
purchase price paid and allocated to the underlying Colombian assets. However, Decree 1103 clarifies that the tax basis of the
entity owning the underlying asset in Colombia is not stepped up. 

See  “Item  3.  Key  Information—D.  Risk  Factors—Risks  related  to  our  common  shares—The  transfer  of  our  common

shares may be subject to capital gains taxes pursuant to indirect transfer rules in Colombia.”

F.    Dividends and paying agents

Not applicable.

G.    Statement by experts

Not applicable.

H.    Documents on display

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and
other  information  with  the  SEC,  including  annual  reports  on  Form  20-F  and  reports  on  Form  6-K.  The  SEC  maintains  an
Internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The
address of that website is www.sec.gov.

I.    Subsidiary information

Not applicable.

ITEM 11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to a variety of market risks, including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, currency risk and credit
(counterparty  and  customer)  risk. The  term  “market  risk”  refers  to  the  risk  of  loss  arising  from  adverse  changes  in  interest
rates, oil and natural gas prices and foreign currency exchange rates.

For further information on our market risks, please see Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

A.    Debt securities

Not applicable.

B.    Warrants and rights

Not applicable.

135

Table of Contents

C.    Other securities

Not applicable.

D.    American Depositary Shares

Not applicable.

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

PART II

A.    Defaults

No matters to report.

B.    Arrears and delinquencies

No matters to report.

ITEM 14.  MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

ITEM 15.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A.    Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As  of  December  31,  2023,  under  the  supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  our  management,  including  our  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), which are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is  (1)  recorded,  processed,  summarized  and  reported  within  the  time  periods  specified  in  the  SEC’s  rules  and  forms,  and
(2)  accumulated  and  communicated  to  our  management  to  allow  timely  decisions  regarding  required  disclosures. There  are
inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any disclosure controls and procedures system, including the possibility of human
error and circumventing or overriding them. Even if effective, disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with assistance from other members
of  management,  have  concluded  that  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were  not  effective  as  of  such  date  due  to  a
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, described below.

B.    Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control over financial reporting as

defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive

and principal financial officers, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the

136

Table of Contents

reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes, in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. These include those policies and procedures that:

● pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that,  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  transactions  and

dispositions of our assets;

● provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to  permit  preparation  of  financial
statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being
made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and

● provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition

of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

its 

inherent 

limitations, 

Because  of 

internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect
misstatements.  Therefore,  effective  control  over  financial  reporting  cannot,  and  does  not,  provide  absolute  assurance  of
achieving  our  control  objectives. Also,  projections  of,  and  any  evaluation  of  effectiveness  of  the  internal  controls  in  future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under  the  supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  our  management,  including  our  Chief  Executive  Officer,  our  Chief
Financial Officer, and our Chief Strategy, Sustainability and Legal Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013).

We  identified  a  material  weakness  in  internal  control  related  to  ineffective  information  technology  general  controls
(ITGCs) over the timely removal of user access upon personnel termination. Our business process controls (both automated
and manual) that are dependent on the affected ITGCs were also deemed ineffective because they could have been adversely
impacted,  as  we  do  not  have  any  compensatory  control  upon  the  outgoing  employees  in  our  ITGC  matrix. We  believe  that
these control deficiencies were a result of (i) IT control processes lacking sufficient documentation such that the successful
operation  of  ITGCs  was  overly  dependent  upon  knowledge  and  actions  of  certain  individuals  with  IT  expertise,  (ii)
insufficient  training  of  IT  personnel  on  the  importance  of  ITGCs,  and  (iii)  inadequate  risk-assessment  processes  for  the
identification and assessment of changes in IT environments that could impact internal control over financial reporting. Based
on this material weakness, we have concluded that as of December 31, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting was
not  effective.  Notwithstanding,  we  have  also  concluded  that  the  material  weakness  did  not  result  in  any  identified
misstatements to the consolidated financial statements, and there were no changes to previously released financial results.

Following  identification  of  the  material  weakness  and  prior  to  filing  this  annual  report  on  Form  20-F,  we  completed
substantive  procedures  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023.  Based  on  these  procedures,  management  believes  that  our
consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting  Standards  as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting  Standards  Boards.  Our  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief
Financial  Officer  have  certified  that,  based  on  their  knowledge,  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S. has
issued an unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial statements. See pages F-2 to F-3 of this annual report.

Remediation

Management has been implementing and continues to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies
contributing  to  the  material  weakness  are  remediated,  such  that  these  controls  are  designed,  implemented,  and  operating
effectively.  The  remediation  actions  include:  (i)  developing  a  training  program  addressing  ITGCs  and  related  policies,
including educating control owners on the principles and requirements of each control, with a focus on those related to user
access  over  IT  systems  impacting  financial  reporting;  (ii)  developing  and  maintaining  documentation  underlying  ITGCs  to
promote knowledge transfer upon personnel and function changes; (iii) implementing an IT management review and testing
plan to monitor ITGCs with a specific focus on timely removal of user access to applications systems supporting

137

Table of Contents

our  financial  reporting  processes  upon  personnel  termination;  and  (iv)  enhanced  quarterly  reporting  on  the  remediation
measures to the Audit Committee of the board of directors.

As  of  the  date  of  this  annual  report,  we  are  implementing  remediation  actions  and  we  believe  that  these  remediation
actions will remediate the material weakness. However, the weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable
controls  operate  for  a  sufficient  period  of  time  and  management  has  concluded,  through  testing,  that  these  controls  are
operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of this material weakness will be completed prior to the end of 2024.

C.    Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, has been audited
by independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S. (member of Ernst & Young Global Limited).
Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S., has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2023. See pages F-4 to F-5 of this annual report.

D.    Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except for the material weakness identified and the ongoing implementation of remediation actions as described above,
there  have  been  no  changes  in  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  year  ended
December  31,  2023,  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  our  internal  controls  over
financial reporting.

ITEM 16.  RESERVED

ITEM 16A.  Audit committee financial expert

We have determined that Mr. Robert Bedingfield, Mr. Constantin Papadimitriou and Ms. Sylvia Escovar are independent,
as  such  term  is  defined  under  SEC  rules  applicable  to  foreign  private  issuers.  In  addition,  Mr.  Robert  Bedingfield  and  Ms.
Sylvia Escovar are regarded as audit committee financial experts.

ITEM 16B.  Code of Conduct

We  have  adopted  a  code  of  conduct  applicable  to  the  board  of  directors  and  all  employees.  Since  its  effective  date  on
September 24, 2012, we have not waived compliance with or amended the code of conduct. The code of conduct is available
at the Company’s website.

ITEM 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Our  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm  is  Ernst  & Young Audit  S.A.S.  (member  of  Ernst  & Young  Global
Limited), beginning with the audit of the year ended December 31, 2023. In 2022, and from 2020, our independent registered
public  accounting  firm  was  Pistrelli,  Henry  Martin  y  Asociados  S.R.L.  (member  of  Ernst  &  Young  Global  Limited).  See
“ITEM 16F. Change in registrant’s certifying accountant”.

The  following  table  provides  detail  in  respect  of  audit,  audit  related,  tax  and  other  fees  billed  by  the  independent

registered public accounting firm and other member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited for professional services:

Audit fees
Audit related fees
Tax services fees
Total

138

2023

2022

(in millions of US$)
 0.98
 0.03
 —
 1.01

 0.94
 0.02
 0.03
 1.00

   
   
Table of Contents

Fees are shown net of VAT and other associated tax charges.

Audit Fees

Audit fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s
annual  financial  statements  or  services  that  are  normally  provided  by  the  accountant  in  connection  with  statutory  and
regulatory  filings  or  engagements  for  those  fiscal  years.  It  includes  the  audit  of  our  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  and
other services that generally only the independent accountant reasonably can provide, such as statutory audits.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees are fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of our Consolidated Financial Statements and not reported under the previous category. These services would
include, among others: comfort letters, consents and assistance with and review of documents, accounting consultations and
audits  in  connection  with  acquisitions,  attestation  of  services  that  are  not  required  by  statue  or  regulation  and  consultation
concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees

Tax fees are fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Following  the  listing  of  our  common  shares  on  the  NYSE,  the  Audit  Committee  proposes  the  appointment  of  the
independent auditor to the board of directors to be put to shareholders for approval at the Annual General meeting. The Audit
Committee oversees the auditor selection process for new auditors and ensures key partners in the appointed firm are rotated
in accordance with best practices. Also, following our NYSE listing, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit
and non-audit fees and services performed by the Company’s auditors in order to be sure that the provision of such services
does not impair the audit firm’s independence.

All  of  the  audit  fees,  audit-related  fees  and  tax  fees  described  in  this  item  16C  have  been  approved  by  the  Audit

Committee.

ITEM 16D.  Exemptions from the listing standards for audit committees

None.

ITEM 16E.  Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.

We  have  recurring  programs  to  repurchase  our  own  shares.  The  latest  renewal  took  place  on  November  8,  2023,  and
established a program to repurchase up to 10% of our shares outstanding, or approximately 5,611,797 shares, until December
31, 2024. In addition to any repurchases under the aforementioned repurchase program, the company has authority from its
board to repurchase, on a standalone basis, up to US$50 million of our common shares in 2024.

139

Table of Contents

The following table presents purchases of our common shares by the company and “affiliated purchasers” (as that term is

defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during 2023:

2023
January 3, 2023
February 6 to February 28, 2023
March 1 to March 31, 2023
April 4 to April 28, 2023
May 1 to May 30, 2023
June 2 to June 20, 2023
September 12 to September 22, 2023
November 21, 2023
December 14, 2023

Total 
Number of
 Shares 
Purchased
 40,000
 80,826
 521,222
 201,305
 371,936
 508,534
 499,765
 340,000
 510,000

Average Price
 Paid per Share
 14.17
 12.77
 11.38
 11.21
 10.30
 9.84
 9.91
 9.49
 8.60

ITEM 16F.  Change in registrant’s certifying accountant

Total Number of

    Maximum Number (or 

 Shares Purchased as  Approximate Dollar Value) of 

Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans or 
Programs

Shares that May Yet be 
Purchased Under the Plans or 
Programs

 40,000
 80,826
 521,222
 201,305
 371,936
 508,534
 499,765
 340,000
 510,000

 5,010,359 shares
 4,929,533 shares
 4,408,311 shares
 4,207,006 shares
 3,835,070 shares
 3,326,536 shares
 2,826,771 shares
 5,271,797 shares
 4,761,797 shares

On  October  17,  2023,  Ernst  & Young Audit  S.A.S.  (member  of  Ernst  & Young  Global  Limited)  was  appointed  as  our
independent  registered  public  accounting  firm,  effective  for  the  consolidated  audit  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,
succeeding Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. (member of Ernst & Young Global Limited), our former independent
registered public accounting firm. The change of our independent registered public accounting firm was made at the request of
the Audit Committee, after careful consideration and evaluation process and was approved by the Audit Committee.

Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2020.
Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L.’s audit reports on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the past two
fiscal years did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty,
audit scope, or accounting principles. In connection with the audits of the Company's financial statements for each of the two
fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, and in the subsequent interim periods through September 29, 2023, there has been (i)
no disagreements (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F and the related instructions thereto) between us and Pistrelli,
Henry  Martin  y  Asociados  S.R.L.  on  any  matter  of  accounting  principles  or  practices,  financial  statement  disclosure,  or
auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados
S.R.L., would have caused Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. to make reference to the subject matter in their report.

During  the  two  most  recent  fiscal  years  ended  December  31,  2022,  and  in  the  subsequent  interim  period  prior  to  the
engagement of Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S. on October 17, 2023, neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf consulted with
Ernst  &  Young Audit  S.A.S.  regarding  either  (i)  the  application  of  accounting  principles  to  a  specified  transaction,  either
completed  or  proposed,  or  the  type  of  audit  opinion  that  might  be  rendered  on  our  consolidated  financial  statements,  and
neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to us that Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S. concluded was an important factor
considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, audit or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter that was the
subject  of  a  disagreement  pursuant  to  Item  16F(a)(1)(iv)  of  Form  20-F  and  the  related  instructions  thereto,  or  (iii)  any
reportable event pursuant to Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.

We  have  provided  Pistrelli,  Henry  Martin  y  Asociados  S.R.L.  with  a  copy  of  this  Item  16F  and  have  requested  and
received from Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not Pistrelli, Henry
Martin y Asociados S.R.L. agrees with the above statements. A copy of the letter from Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados
S.R.L. is attached as Exhibit 15.4 to this annual report.

140

   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
Table of Contents

ITEM 16G.  Corporate governance

Our common shares are listed on the NYSE. We are therefore required to comply with certain of the NYSE’s corporate
governance  listing  standards  (the  “NYSE  Standards”).  As  a  foreign  private  issuer,  we  may  follow  our  home  country’s
corporate governance practices in lieu of most of the NYSE Standards. Our corporate governance practices differ in certain
significant  respects  from  those  that  U.S.  companies  must  adopt  in  order  to  maintain  NYSE  listing  and,  in  accordance  with
Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, a brief, general summary of those differences is provided as follows.

Director independence

The  NYSE  Standards  require  a  majority  of  the  membership  of  NYSE-listed  company  boards  to  be  composed  of
independent directors. Neither Bermuda law, the law of our country of incorporation, nor our memorandum of association or
bye-laws require a majority of our board to consist of independent directors.

At the date of this annual report, 67% of our board of directors is independent.

Non-management directors’ executive sessions

The  NYSE  Standards  require  non-management  directors  of  NYSE-listed  companies  to  meet  at  regularly  scheduled
executive sessions without management. Our memorandum of association and bye-laws do not require our non-management
directors to hold such meetings.

Committee member composition

The  NYSE  Standards  require  domestic  NYSE-listed  companies  to  have  a  nominating/corporate  governance  committee
and a compensation committee that are composed entirely of independent directors. Bermuda law, the law of our country of
incorporation, does not impose similar requirements.

Independence of the compensation committee and its advisers

On  January  11,  2013,  the  SEC  approved  NYSE  listing  standards  that  require  that  the  board  of  directors  of  a  domestic
listed  company  consider  two  factors  (in  addition  to  the  existing  general  independence  tests)  in  the  evaluation  of  the
independence of compensation committee members: (i) the source of compensation of the director, including any consulting,
advisory or other compensatory fees paid by the listed company, and (ii) whether the director has an affiliate relationship with
the listed company, a subsidiary of the listed company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the listed company. In addition, before
selecting  or  receiving  advice  from  a  compensation  consultant  or  other  adviser,  the  compensation  committee  of  a  listed
company will be required to take into consideration six specific factors, as well as all other factors relevant to an adviser’s
independence.

Foreign  private  issuers,  such  as  us,  will  be  exempt  from  these  requirements  if  home  country  practice  is  followed.
Bermuda  law  does  not  impose  similar  requirements,  so  we  will  not  be  required  to  implement  the  NYSE  listing  standards
relating to compensation committees of domestic listed companies. All of the members of our compensation committee are
independent,  and  the  charter  of  our  compensation  committee  does  not  require  the  compensation  committee  to  consider  the
independence of any advisers that assist them in fulfilling their duties.

Additional audit committee functions

The NYSE Standards require that audit committees of domestic companies to serve a number of functions in addition to
reviewing  and  approving  the  company’s  financial  statements,  engaging  auditors  and  assessing  their  independence,  and
obtaining the legal and other professional advice of experts when necessary. For instance, the NYSE Standards require that the
audit  committee  meet  independently  with  management  in  a  separate  session  in  order  to  maximize  the  effectiveness  of  the
committee’s  oversight  function.  In  addition,  audit  committees  must  obtain  and  review  a  report  by  the  independent  auditors
describing the firm’s internal quality-control procedures and any issues raised by these procedures. Finally, audit

141

Table of Contents

committees  are  responsible  for  designing  and  implementing  an  internal  audit  function  that  assesses  the  company’s  risk
management processes and systems of internal control on an ongoing basis.

Foreign private issuers such as us are exempt from these additional requirements if home country practice is followed.
Bermuda law does not impose similar requirements, and consequently, our audit committee does not perform these additional
functions. Our Audit Committee is composed exclusively of independent members.

Miscellaneous

In  addition  to  the  above  differences,  we  are  not  required  to:  make  our  audit  and  compensation  committees  prepare  a
written charter that addresses either purposes and responsibilities or performance evaluations in a manner that would satisfy
the  NYSE’s  requirements;  acquire  shareholder  approval  of  equity  compensation  plans  in  certain  cases;  or  adopt  and  make
publicly available corporate governance guidelines.

We are incorporated under, and are governed by, the laws of Bermuda. For a summary of some of the differences between
provisions  of  Bermuda  law  applicable  to  us  and  the  laws  applicable  to  companies  incorporated  in  Delaware  and  their
shareholders, See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum of association and bye-laws.”

ITEM 16H.  Mine safety disclosure

Not applicable.

ITEM 16I.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

ITEM 16J. Insider trading policies

Not applicable.

ITEM 16K. Cybersecurity

GeoPark prioritizes cybersecurity risk management as an integral part of our overall enterprise risk management model.
Our  cybersecurity  risk  management  practices  provide  a  framework  for  handling  cybersecurity  threats  and  incidents  and
facilitating coordination across our different departments.

Beginning in 2022, we successfully implemented the NIST framework and established a 24/7 Security Operations Center,
reinforcing  our  commitment  to  cybersecurity.  This  framework  includes:  the  following  measures:  (i)  the  inventory  and
prioritization  of  each  of  the  assets  connected  to  the  GeoPark  network,  (ii)  the  implementation  and  assessment  of  the
effectiveness of the necessary controls to protect such assets against cyber threats, (iii) the 24/7 monitoring of cyber threats
and the status of the relevant assets, (iv) the implementation and testing of processes for the mitigation and/or containment of
cyberattacks,  (v)  cyber-incident  management  process,  and  (vi)  a  recovery  plan,  should  a  cyberattack  materialize,  that
minimizes the impact of such cyberattack on the operations of the company.

 Under the NIST framework, we address possible cybersecurity threats associated with third-party service providers by
identifying the dependence of our operations on third-party service providers. We have established cybersecurity requirements
for  the  provision  of  services  and/or  the  integration  of  infrastructures,  which  are  included  in  the  corresponding  contractual
documentation with third-party service providers. Additionally, we require our third-party service providers to deliver periodic
information on compliance with said requirements.

In 2023, we reinforced our defenses against cyber threats by enhancing our cybersecurity capabilities with the onboarding
of a new Information Security Manager and creation of an operational security management team. Additionally, we optimize
our  platforms  using  industry-leading  protection  systems,  such  as  Crowd  Strike,  Palo  Alto  firewalls,  Multifactor
Authentication, Microsoft Defense, Darktrace, Tanium, DNA Center, Umbrella, GRC, and

142

Table of Contents

SDWAN.  To  strengthen  our  technology  infrastructure  and  enhance  data  protection  practices,  we  developed  a  site  recovery
solution  for  critical  applications,  involving  redundant  systems  in  different  geographical  locations  and  intercloud  backups
across multiple service providers.

Our  board  of  directors  has  overall  oversight  responsibility  for  our  risk  management  and  delegates  cybersecurity  risk
management  oversight  to  the Audit  Committee.  In  this  capacity,  the Audit  Committee  reviews  and  reports  to  the  full  board
regarding  cybersecurity  risks  and  plans  to  ensure  management  has  processes  in  place  to  identify,  evaluate  and  mitigate
cybersecurity  risks.  Management  is  responsible  for  ongoing  risk  assessment,  monitoring  and  maintaining  cybersecurity
programs, a process led by our corporate IT Director with the support of our Information Security Manager. Our IT Director
and Information Security Manager regularly update the Audit Committee on the company’s cybersecurity programs, risks, and
mitigation strategies. Following our IT Director’s decision to voluntarily exit the company, effective as of February 29, 2024,
we are currently in the process of recruiting a new IT Director with relevant cybersecurity experience and the IT Director’s
responsibilities are being covered in an interim fashion by our Information Security Manager, who, while performing any such
interim duties and until we onboard our new IT Director, will regularly report to our Chief Financial Officer. Our Information
Security  Manager  holds  a  master’s  degree  in  computer  science  and  has  worked  for  over  20  years  in  various  information
security  and  cybersecurity  positions  with  increasing  levels  of  responsibility.  He  also  holds  a  broad  range  of  cybersecurity-
related certifications such as and among others: (i) Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA), (ii) Certified Information
Security Manager (CISM), and (iii) Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT (CGEIT).

In  the  event  a  cyberattack  materializes,  our  cyber-incident  management  process  is  triggered  and  an  interdisciplinary
committee (which includes our IT Director, our Information Security Manager and the cybersecurity team) is convened. The
interdisciplinary  committee  is  charged  with  containing  the  cyberattack  in  the  shortest  possible  time  with  the  minimum
possible  impact  to  our  operations.  This  process  has  an  escalation  matrix  where,  depending  on  the  infrastructure  and
information compromised, management of the incident is scaled to specific roles in the company. Any material incidents are
required  to  be  reported  by  our  IT  Director  and  Information  Security  Manager  to  the  Audit  Committee  and  the  board  of
directors.

As part of our risk management process, we seek to determine if there are any risks that have not been identified or that
have not been properly assessed. Accordingly, our IT team and the Information Security Manager conduct annual reviews that
inventory,  evaluate,  and  assess  cybersecurity  risks,  including  those  related  to  third-party  service  providers,  at  both  the
information  and  operational  infrastructure  level.  With  the  goal  of  having  an  independent  judgment,  we  complement  the
internal  annual  review  with  the  engagement  of  a  third-party  cybersecurity  expert,  with  relevant  expertise  in  these  kind  of
methodologies,  risk  evaluations  and  mitigation  plans  design,  who  conducts  ethical  hacking  exercises  to  test:  (i)  from  an
external viewpoint, the paths that an attacker could use to try to compromise our infrastructure and information by simulating
the activity of an attacker using sophisticated tools and expertise, and (ii) from an internal viewpoint, our security operation
center’s capability to detect and contain such simulated attack.

Following the annual review described above, mitigation plans are generated by the Information Security Manager and
approved by the IT director to remove any identified risks or bring them to acceptable levels. Once approved, the IT Director
and the Information Security Manager present the mitigation plans to the Audit Committee. Furthermore, we also engage a
third-party  cybersecurity  expert  for  purposes  of  conducting  an  annual  audit  which  seeks  to  assess  and  evaluate  the
effectiveness of cybersecurity controls currently in place. The results of the annual audit are shared with our Audit Committee.

As cyber-threats continue to evolve, we may be required to invest significant additional resources to continue modifying
and enhancing our protective measures and to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. We have a
cybersecurity insurance policy, and it acknowledges that evolving cyber-threats may require significant additional resources.
In 2023, we did not identify any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect
our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, despite our efforts, we cannot eliminate all risks
from cybersecurity threats, or provide assurances that we have not experienced an undetected cybersecurity incident. For more
information about these risks, please see “Risk Factors – Our business could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity threats
and related disruptions.” in this annual report on Form 20-F.

143

Table of Contents

ITEM 17. Financial statements

We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of this item.

ITEM 18. Financial statements

PART III

Financial Statements are filed as part of this annual report, see pages F-1 to F-73 to this annual report.

ITEM 19. Exhibits

1.1

1.2

Exhibit no.     

Description
Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1
(File No. 333-191068) filed with the SEC on September 9, 2013).

  Memorandum of Association (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1

2.1

2.3

1.4

2.2

1.3

2.4
4.1

(File No. 333-191068) filed with the SEC on September 9, 2013).
Current  bye-laws  (incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  Exhibit  1.3  to  the  Company’s Annual  Report  on  Form  20-F  filed  with  the
SEC on March 31, 2021).
Certificate of Incorporation on Name Change (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, 2021).
Indenture dated January 17, 2020, among GeoPark Limited and the Bank of New York Mellon (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 1, 2020).
First Supplemental Indenture dated August 25, 2021, among GeoPark Limited and GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. and the Bank of New
York Mellon (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on
March 31, 2022).
Second  Supplemental  Indenture  dated  June  27,  2022,  among  GeoPark  Limited  and  the  Bank  of  New York  Mellon  (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 30, 2023).
Description of Securities. *
Exploration  and  Production  Contract  regarding  exploration  for  and  exploitation  of  hydrocarbons  in  the  Llanos  34  Block,  dated
March 13, 2009, between the Colombian Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos and Unión Temporal Llanos 34 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-191068) filed with the SEC on
September 9, 2013).
Subsidiaries of GeoPark Limited.*
Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
Consent of Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S. (member of Ernst & Young Global Limited). *
Consent of Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados (member of Ernst & Young Global Limited). *
Consents of DeGolyer and MacNaughton to use its report.*
Letter of Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L., as required by Item 16F of Form 20-F.*
Compensation Recoupment Policy. *
Reserves  Report  of  DeGolyer  and  MacNaughton  dated  March  1,  2024,  for  reserves  in  Brazil,  Chile,  Colombia  and  Ecuador
as of December 31, 2023.*
101.INS  
Inline XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

8.1
12.1
12.2
13.1
13.2
15.1
15.2
15.3
15.4
97.1
99.1

104

104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and included in Exhibit 101)

*

Filed with this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

144

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table of Contents

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and

authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

SIGNATURES

GEOPARK LIMITED

By: /s/ Andrés Ocampo
  Name: Andrés Ocampo

Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: March 27, 2024

145

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements—GeoPark Limited
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S. (member of Ernst &
Young Global Limited) located in Bogota, Colombia. PCAOB ID No. 1522.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L.
(member of Ernst & Young Global Limited) located in Buenos Aires, Argentina. PCAOB ID No. 1449.
Consolidated Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022
and 2021.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and
2021.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Notes to the Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page

F-2

F-6

F-7
F-9

F-10
F-11
F-12

F-1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of
GeoPark Limited

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  statement  of  financial  position  of  GeoPark  Limited  (the  Company)  as  of
December 31, 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows
for  the  year  then  ended  and  the  related  notes  (collectively  referred  to  as  the  “consolidated  financial  statements”).  In  our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at
December  31,  2023,  and  the  results  of  its  operations  and  its  cash  flows  for  the  year  then  ended,  in  conformity  with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(2013 framework) and our report dated March 27, 2024 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to
error  or  fraud.  Our  audit  included  performing  procedures  to  assess  the  risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included
evaluating  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that
was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that
are  material  to  the  financial  statements  and  (ii)  involved  our  especially  challenging,  subjective  or  complex  judgments. The
communication  of  the  critical  audit  matter  does  not  alter  in  any  way  our  opinion  on  the  consolidated  financial  statements,
taken  as  a  whole,  and  we  are  not,  by  communicating  the  critical  audit  matter  below,  providing  a  separate  opinion  on  the
critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Impact of estimated proved and probable oil and gas reserves on the depreciation of oil and gas properties

Description of the Matter

As discussed in Note 2.11, the proved and probable reserves are used by the Company in the depreciation of the capitalized
costs of proved oil and gas properties and production facilities and machinery, using the unit-of-production method based on
commercial proved and probable oil and gas reserves, as estimated by independent reserves engineers. As described in Note
10 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of the Company’s oil and gas properties and production
facilities and machinery was $587 million as of December 31, 2023, and depreciation expense was $108 million

F-2

Table of Contents

for  the  year  then  ended. The  estimation  of  proved  and  probable  oil  and  gas  reserves  also  requires  the  evaluation  of  inputs,
including oil and gas prices and quality differentials, historical oil and gas production, royalties and future development and
operating costs, among others.

Auditing the Company’s calculation of depreciation of oil and gas properties was complex because of the use of the work of
the independent reserves engineers and the evaluation of management’s determination of the inputs described above used by
the engineers in estimating proved and probable oil and gas reserves.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls
over  its  process  to  calculate  depreciation  of  oil  and  gas  properties,  including  management’s  controls  over  the  completeness
and  the  accuracy  of  the  financial  data  provided  to  the  specialists  for  use  in  estimating  proved  and  probable  oil  and  gas
reserves.

Our  audit  procedures  included,  among  others,  obtaining  the  reserves  report  from  the  independent  reserves  engineers  and
evaluating  the  competency  and  objectivity  of  the  independent  reserves  engineers  and  management´s  qualified  persons
responsible  for  overseeing  the  preparation  of  the  reserves  estimates  through  the  consideration  of  their  professional
qualifications  and  experience,  as  well  as  the  use  of  generally  accepted  practices  and  methodologies  in  preparing  reserves
estimates. Additionally, we evaluated the completeness and accuracy of the financial data and inputs used by the independent
reserves engineers in estimating proved and probable oil and gas reserves by agreeing the inputs to source documentation and
comparing them to historical results. For the future development costs, we also evaluated management’s development plan by
assessing consistency of the development projections with the Company’s drill plan and the availability of capital to develop
such  plan. We  also  tested  the  mathematical  accuracy  of  the  depreciation  computations  for  oil  and  gas  properties,  including
testing the underlying data by comparing the proved and probable oil and gas reserves amounts used in the calculations to the
reserves report prepared by the independent reserves engineers.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG AUDIT S.A.S
Member of Ernst & Young Global Limited

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.
Bogotá, Colombia
March 27, 2024

F-3

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the board of directors of
GeoPark Limited

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We  have  audited  GeoPark  Limited’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2023,  based  on  criteria
established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described
below  on  the  achievement  of  the  objectives  of  the  control  criteria,  GeoPark  Limited  (the  Company)  has  not  maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there
is  a  reasonable  possibility  that  a  material  misstatement  of  the  company’s  annual  or  interim  financial  statements  will  not  be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s
assessment. Management has identified a material weakness in the design and execution of information technology general
controls  (ITGCs)  over  the  timely  removal  of  user  access  upon  personnel  termination. As  a  result,  application  and  manual
controls that are dependent on the affected ITGCs were also deemed ineffective.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated statement of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023, the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, and
the related notes. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in
our audit of the 2023 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 27, 2024, which
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The  Company’s  management  is  responsible  for  maintaining  effective  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and  for  its
assessment  of  the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  included  in  the  accompanying  Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and
are  required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the  Company  in  accordance  with  the  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  and  the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  effective  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  was  maintained  in  all
material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  a  process  designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that  (1)  pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that,  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and
dispositions  of  the  assets  of  the  company;  (2)  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management

F-4

Table of Contents

and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect  misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG AUDIT S.A.S
Member of Ernst & Young Global Limited

Bogotá, Colombia
March 27, 2024

F-5

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of
GeoPark Limited

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  statement  of  financial  position  of  GeoPark  Limited  (the  Company)  as  of
December 31, 2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows
for  each  of  the  two  years  in  the  period  ended  December  31,  2022,  and  the  related  notes  (collectively  referred  to  as  the
“consolidated  financial  statements”).  In  our  opinion,  the  consolidated  financial  statements  present  fairly,  in  all  material
respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States)  (PCAOB)  and  are  required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the  Company  in
accordance  with  the  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  and  the  applicable  rules  and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to  error  or  fraud.  Our  audits  included  performing  procedures  to  assess  the  risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  regarding  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial  statements.  Our  audits  also
included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PISTRELLI, HENRY MARTIN Y ASOCIADOS S.R.L.
Member of Ernst & Young Global Limited

We served as the Company’s auditor from 2020 to 2023.

Buenos Aires, Argentina
March 8, 2023

F-6

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

Amounts in US$´000
REVENUE

Commodity risk management contracts loss
Production and operating costs
Geological and geophysical expenses
Administrative expenses
Selling expenses
Depreciation
Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
Impairment loss for non-financial assets, net
Other (expenses) income (a)
OPERATING PROFIT
Financial expenses
Financial income
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAX
Income tax expense
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR
Earnings per share (in US$). Basic
Earnings per share (in US$). Diluted

    Note

7
8
9
12
13
14

20
20‑37

15
15
15

17

19
19

2023
756,625
—
(232,325)
(11,192)
(43,969)
(13,084)
(120,934)
(29,563)
(13,332)
(21,319)
270,907
(45,815)
6,237
(16,820)
214,509
(103,441)
111,068
1.95

2022
1,049,579
(70,221)
(359,779)
(10,529)
(50,024)
(7,995)
(96,692)
(25,789)
—
527
429,077
(57,073)
3,180
19,725
394,909
(170,474)
224,435
3.78

2021
688,543
(109,191)
(212,790)
(7,891)
(46,828)
(8,730)
(88,969)
(12,262)
(4,334)
(11,739)
185,809
(64,112)
1,652
5,049
128,398
(67,271)
61,127
1.00

1.94

3.75

0.99

(a) Includes results related to business transactions in Chile and Argentina. See Note 36.

The notes on pages F-12 to F-73 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-7

   
   
   
Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Amounts in US$´000

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income:
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss

Currency translation differences
Gain on cash flow hedges (a)
Income tax expense relating to cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive profit (loss) for the year

2023
111,068

2022
224,435

2021
61,127

1,624
2,738
(1,369)
2,993

2,121
966
(483)
2,604

(1,438)
—
—
(1,438)

Total comprehensive profit for the year

114,061

227,039

59,689

a) Unrealized result on commodity risk management contracts designated as cash flow hedges. See Note 8.

The notes on pages F-12 to F-73 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-8

   
   
   
Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

Amounts in US$´000
ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
Right-of-use assets
Prepayments and other receivables
Other financial assets
Deferred income tax asset
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories
Trade receivables
Prepayments and other receivables
Derivative financial instrument assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Assets held for sale
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
EQUITY
Equity attributable to owners of the Company
Share capital
Share premium
Translation reserve
Other reserves
Retained earnings (Accumulated losses)
TOTAL EQUITY
LIABILITIES
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Borrowings
Lease liabilities
Provisions and other long-term liabilities
Deferred income tax liability
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Borrowings
Lease liabilities
Derivative financial instrument liabilities
Current income tax liabilities
Trade and other payables
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Note

2023

2022

20
28
22
25
18

23
24
22
25
25
36

26.1

27
28
29
18

27
28
25
17
30
36

686,824
28,451
3,063
12,564
15,920
746,822

13,552
65,049
25,896
3,775
133,036
28,419
269,727
1,016,549

666,879
37,011
121
12,877
18,943
735,831

14,434
71,794
22,106
967
128,843
—
238,144
973,975

55
111,281
(9,962)
45,116
29,530
176,020

58
134,798
(11,586)
73,462
(81,147)
115,585

488,453
23,387
34,083
64,063
609,986

12,528
8,911
70
44,269
137,817
26,948
230,543
840,529
1,016,549

485,114
22,051
51,947
70,123
629,235

12,528
10,000
19
65,002
141,606
—
229,155
858,390
973,975

The notes on pages F-12 to F-73 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-9

   
   
   
Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

Amount in US$‘000
Equity as of January 1, 2021
Comprehensive income:
Profit for the year
Other comprehensive loss for the year
Total Comprehensive (loss) profit for the year 2021
Transactions with owners:
Share-based payment (Note 31)
Repurchase of shares (Note 26.1.3)
Cash distribution (Note 26.2)
Total 2021
Balances as of December 31, 2021
Comprehensive income:
Profit for the year
Other comprehensive profit for the year
Total Comprehensive profit for the year 2022
Transactions with owners:
Share-based payment (Note 31)
Repurchase of shares (Note 26.1.3)
Cash distribution (Note 26.2)
Total 2022
Balances as of December 31, 2022
Comprehensive income:
Profit for the year
Other comprehensive profit for the year
Total Comprehensive profit for the year 2023
Transactions with owners:
Share-based payment (Note 31)
Repurchase of shares (Note 26.1.3)
Cash distribution (Note 26.2)
Total 2023
Balances as of December 31, 2023

Attributable to owners of the Company

Share

Share

Translation

Other

    Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated

 Capital
61

Premium
179,399

 Reserve
(12,269)

 Reserves
104,485

 Losses)
(380,866)

Total
(109,190)

—
—
—

—
(1)
—
(1)
60

—
—
—

1
(3)
—
(2)
58

—
—
—

1
(4)
—
(3)
55

—
—
—

—
(1,438)
(1,438)

—
—
—

61,127
—
61,127

61,127
(1,438)
59,689

1,661
(11,840)
—
(10,179)
169,220

—
—
—
—
— (7,224)
— (7,224)
97,261

(13,707)

4,960

6,621
— (11,841)
(7,224)
—
(12,444)
4,960
(61,945)
(314,779)

—
—
—

—
2,121
2,121

—
483
483

224,435
—
224,435

224,435
2,604
227,039

1,840
(36,262)
—
(34,422)
134,798

—
—
—
—
— (24,282)
— (24,282)
73,462

(11,586)

9,197

11,038
— (36,265)
— (24,282)
(49,509)
115,585

9,197
(81,147)

—
—
—

—
1,624
1,624

—
1,369
1,369

111,068
—
111,068

111,068
2,993
114,061

7,718
(31,235)
—
(23,517)
111,281

—
—
—
—
— (29,715)
— (29,715)
45,116

(9,962)

(391)

7,328
— (31,239)
— (29,715)
(53,626)
176,020

(391)
29,530

The notes on pages F-12 to F-73 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-10

   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Amounts in US$‘000
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit for the year
Adjustments for:
Income tax expense
Depreciation
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Impairment loss for non-financial assets
Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
Accrual of borrowing’s interests
Borrowings cancellation costs
Amortization of other long-term liabilities
Unwinding of long-term liabilities
Accrual of share-based payment
Foreign exchange loss (gain)
Unrealized gain on commodity risk management contracts
Income tax paid (a)
Changes in working capital (b)
Cash flows from operating activities – net
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from disposal of long-term assets
Cash flows used in investing activities – net
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings
Debt issuance costs paid
Principal paid
Interest paid
Borrowings cancellation and other costs paid
Lease payments
Repurchase of shares
Cash distribution
Payments for transactions with former non-controlling interest
Cash flows used in financing activities – net
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at January 1
Currency translation differences
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

Ending Cash and cash equivalents are specified as follows:
Cash in bank and bank deposits
Cash in hand
Cash and cash equivalents

    Note

2023

2022

2021

111,068

224,435

61,127

17

20‑37
20

15
29
15

15
8

5

36

5
5
5
5
5
5
26.1
26.2

103,441
120,934
426
13,332
29,563
30,839
—
(127)
6,456
7,328
19,729

170,474
96,692
73
—
25,789
36,360
5,141
(2,407)
6,026
11,038
(19,725)
— (13,023)
(33,355)
(40,047)
467,471

(115,626)
(26,425)
300,938

67,271
88,969
787
4,334
12,262
44,378
6,308
(223)
5,079
6,621
(5,049)
(463)
(65,273)
(9,351)
216,777

(199,040)
450
(198,590)

(168,808)
15,135
(153,673)

(129,258)
2,700
(126,558)

— 172,174
—
(2,019)
—
—
(274,934)
— (172,522)
(42,592)
(36,514)
(12,908)
(9,118)
(7,518)
(7,851)
(11,841)
(36,265)
(7,224)
(24,282)
—
(3,580)
(190,442)
(286,552)
(100,223)
27,246

(27,500)
—
(10,267)
(31,239)
(29,715)
—
(98,721)
3,627

128,843
566
133,036

100,604
993
128,843

201,907
(1,080)
100,604

133,023
13
133,036

128,831
12
128,843

100,587
17
100,604

(a)
(b)

Includes self-withholding taxes for US$ 35,116,000, US$ 20,767,000 and US$ 12,469,000 in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Includes  withholding  taxes  from  clients  for  US$  27,558,000,  US$  27,256,000  and  US$  16,361,000  in  2023,  2022  and  2021,
respectively.

The notes on pages F-12 to F-73 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-11

   
   
   
Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1     General Information

GeoPark Limited (the “Company”) is a company incorporated under the law of Bermuda. The Registered Office address is
Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda.

The  principal  activities  of  the  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  (the  “Group”  or  “GeoPark”)  are  exploration,  development  and
production for oil and gas reserves in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil.

These Consolidated Financial Statements were authorized for issue by the board of directors on March 6, 2024 and have been
approved to be included in our 2023 annual report (Form 20-F) on March 27, 2024.

Note 2     Summary of significant accounting policies

The  principal  accounting  policies  applied  in  the  preparation  of  these  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  are  set  out  below.
These policies have been consistently applied to the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

2.1 Basis of preparation

The  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  of  GeoPark  Limited  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  International  Financial
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), under the historical cost
basis, except for the following: certain financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) measured at fair value,
and assets held for sale – measured at fair value less costs to sell.

The  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  are  presented  in  thousands  of  United  States  Dollars  (US$’000)  and  all  values  are
rounded to the nearest thousand (US$’000), except in the footnotes and where otherwise indicated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It
also  requires  management  to  exercise  its  judgement  in  the  process  of  applying  the  Group’s  accounting  policies.  The  areas
involving  a  higher  degree  of  judgement  or  complexity,  or  areas  where  assumptions  and  estimates  are  significant  to  the
Consolidated Financial Statements are disclosed in this note under the title “Accounting estimates and assumptions”.

All  the  information  included  in  these  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  corresponds  to  the  Group,  except  where  otherwise
indicated.

2.1.1 Changes in accounting policy and disclosure

2.1.1.1 New and amended standards and interpretations

The Group applied for the first-time certain standards and amendments, which are effective for annual periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2023, as follows:

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts is a comprehensive new accounting standard for insurance contracts covering recognition and
measurement, presentation, and disclosure.

This new accounting standard replaces IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts. IFRS 17 applies to all types of insurance contracts (i.e.,
life, non-life, direct insurance, and re-insurance), regardless of the type of entity that issues them, as well as certain guarantees
and financial instruments with discretionary participation features. A few scope exceptions will apply.
The overall objective of IFRS 17 is to provide a comprehensive accounting model for insurance contracts that is more useful
and consistent for insurers, covering all relevant accounting aspects. IFRS 17 is based on a general model, supplemented by:

F-12

Table of Contents

● a specific adaptation for contracts with direct participation features (the variable fee approach), and
● a simplified approach (the premium allocation approach) mainly for short-duration contracts.

The new standard had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group.

Definition of Accounting Estimates - Amendments to IAS 8

The amendments to IAS 8 clarify the distinction between changes in accounting estimates, changes in accounting policies and
the correction of errors. They also clarify how to use measurement techniques and inputs to develop accounting estimates.

These amendments had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group.

Disclosure of Accounting Policies - Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2

The  amendments  to  IAS  1  and  IFRS  Practice  Statement  2  Making  Materiality  Judgements  provide  guidance  to  apply
materiality judgements to accounting policy disclosures. The amendments aim to provide accounting policy disclosures that
are more useful by replacing the requirement to disclose their ‘significant’ accounting policies with a requirement to disclose
their ‘material’ accounting policies and adding guidance on how to apply the concept of materiality in making decisions about
accounting policy disclosures.

These amendments had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group.

Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction – Amendments to IAS 12

The amendments to IAS 12 Income Tax narrow the scope of the initial recognition exception, so that it no longer applies to
transactions  that  give  rise  to  equal  taxable  and  deductible  temporary  differences  such  as  leases  and  decommissioning
liabilities.

These amendments had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group.

International Tax Reform—Pillar Two Model Rules – Amendments to IAS 12

The amendments to IAS 12 have been introduced in response to the OECD’s BEPS Pillar Two model rules and include:

● a mandatory temporary exception to the recognition and disclosure of deferred taxes arising from the jurisdictional

implementation of the Pillar Two model rules,

● disclosure  requirements  to  assist  in  better  understanding  the  Pillar Two  income  taxes  arising  from  that  legislation,

particularly before its effective date.

The  mandatory  temporary  exception  applies  immediately.  The  disclosure  requirements  apply  for  annual  reporting  periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2023, but not for any interim periods ending on or before December 31, 2023.

The amendments had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group.

2.1.1.2 Standards issued but not yet effective

The new and amended standards and interpretations that have been issued, but are not yet effective, as of the date of issuance
of  these  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  are  disclosed  below.  The  Group  has  not  early  adopted  these  new  and  amended
standards and interpretations, and intends to adopt them, if applicable, when they become effective.

Amendments to IFRS 16: Lease Liability in a Sale and Leaseback

F-13

Table of Contents

In September 2022, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 16 to specify the requirements that a seller-lessee uses in measuring
the lease liability arising in a sale and leaseback transaction, to ensure the seller-lessee does not recognize any amount of the
gain or loss that relates to the right of use it retains.

The  amendments  are  effective  for  annual  reporting  periods  beginning  on  or  after  January  1,  2024,  and  must  be  applied
retrospectively  to  sale  and  leaseback  transactions  entered  into  after  the  date  of  initial  application  of  IFRS  16.  Earlier
application is permitted, and any earlier application must be disclosed.

The amendments are not expected to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group.

Amendments to IAS 1: Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current

In January 2020 and October 2022, the IASB issued amendments to paragraphs 69 to 76 of IAS 1 to specify the requirements
for classifying liabilities as current or non-current. The amendments clarify:

● what is meant by a right to defer settlement;
● that a right to defer must exist at the end of the reporting period;
● that classification is unaffected by the likelihood that an entity will exercise its deferral right; and
● that  only  if  an  embedded  derivative  in  a  convertible  liability  is  itself  an  equity  instrument  would  the  terms  of  a

liability not impact its classification.

In addition, a requirement has been introduced to require disclosure when a liability arising from a loan agreement is classified
as  non-current  and  the  entity’s  right  to  defer  settlement  is  contingent  on  compliance  with  future  covenants  within  twelve
months.

The  amendments  are  effective  for  annual  reporting  periods  beginning  on  or  after  January  1,  2024,  and  must  be  applied
retrospectively.  The  Group  is  currently  assessing  the  impact  the  amendments  will  have  on  current  practice  and  whether
existing loan agreements may require renegotiation.

Supplier Finance Arrangements - Amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7

In May 2023, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows and IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
to clarify the characteristics of supplier finance arrangements and require additional disclosure of such arrangements.

The disclosure requirements in the amendments are intended to assist users of financial statements in understanding the effects
of supplier finance arrangements on an entity’s liabilities, cash flows and exposure to liquidity risk.

The amendments will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024. Early adoption is
permitted but would need to be disclosed. The amendments are not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s
Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors

On  March  06,  2024,  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (SEC)  issued  the  final  rule  on  The  Enhancement  and
Standardization  of  Climate-Related  Disclosures  for  Investors. This  rule  mandates  the  disclosure  of  information  regarding  a
registrant’s  climate-related  risks  that  have  materially  impacted  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  have  a  material  impact  on,  its
business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. While compliance with this rule is phased in and not required
for these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Group is currently assessing the impact of this rule and planification efforts
ahead of initial required compliance.

2.2 Going concern

The  Directors  regularly  monitor  the  Group’s  cash  position  and  liquidity  risks  throughout  the  year  to  ensure  that  it  has
sufficient funds to meet forecasted operational and investment funding requirements. Sensitivities are run to reflect latest

F-14

Table of Contents

expectations of expenditures, oil and gas prices and other factors to enable the Group to manage the risk of any funding short
falls and/or potential debt covenant breaches.

Considering the performance of the operations, the Group’s cash position of US$ 133,036,000, the oil hedges to mitigate the
price risk exposure within the next twelve to fifteen months, the deleveraging process executed in 2021 and 2022 (see Note
27), and the fact that its total indebtedness as of December 31, 2023, matures in January 2027, the Directors have formed a
judgement,  at  the  time  of  approving  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements,  that  there  is  a  reasonable  expectation  that  the
Group  has  adequate  resources  to  meet  all  its  obligations  for  the  foreseeable  future.  For  this  reason,  the  Directors  have
continued to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2.3 Consolidation

Subsidiaries  are  all  entities  (including  structured  entities)  over  which  the  Group  has  control.  The  Group  controls  an  entity
when  the  Group  is  exposed  to,  or  has  rights  to,  variable  returns  from  its  involvement  with  the  entity  and  has  the  ability  to
affect  those  returns  through  its  power  over  the  entity.  Subsidiaries  are  fully  consolidated  from  the  date  on  which  control  is
transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.

Intercompany  transactions,  balances  and  unrealized  gains  on  transactions  between  the  Group  and  its  subsidiaries  are
eliminated.  Unrealized  losses  are  also  eliminated  unless  the  transaction  provides  evidence  of  an  impairment  of  the  asset
transferred.  Amounts  reported  in  the  financial  statements  of  subsidiaries  have  been  adjusted  where  necessary  to  ensure
consistency with the accounting policies adopted by the Group.

2.4 Segment reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-
maker.  The  chief  operating  decision-maker,  who  is  responsible  for  allocating  resources  and  assessing  performance  of  the
operating  segments,  has  been  identified  as  the  Executive  Committee.  This  committee  is  integrated  by  the  Chief  Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technical Officer, Chief Exploration Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy,
Sustainability and Legal Officer and Chief People Officer. This committee reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to
assess performance and allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segments based on these reports.

2.5 Foreign currency translation

2.5.1 Functional and presentation currency

The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in US Dollars, which is the Group’s presentation currency.

Items included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the
primary  economic  environment  in  which  the  entity  operates  (the  “functional  currency”).  The  functional  currency  of  Group
companies  incorporated  in  Colombia,  Ecuador,  Chile  and Argentina  is  the  US  Dollar,  meanwhile  for  the  Group´s  Brazilian
company the functional currency is the local currency, which is the Brazilian Real.

2.5.2 Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at
period-end  exchange  rates  of  monetary  assets  and  liabilities  denominated  in  foreign  currencies  are  recognized  in  the
Consolidated Statement of Income.

The  results  and  financial  position  of  foreign  operations  that  have  a  functional  currency  different  from  the  presentation
currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows: assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate, and
income  and  expenses  are  translated  at  average  exchange  rates. All  resulting  exchange  differences  are  recognized  in  Other
comprehensive income.

F-15

Table of Contents

2.6 Joint arrangements

Under IFRS 11, investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the
contractual rights and obligations of each investor. The Group has assessed the nature of its joint arrangements and determined
them to be joint operations. The Group combines its share in the joint operations individual assets, liabilities, results and cash
flows on a line-by-line basis with similar items in its Consolidated Financial Statements.

2.7 Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate
of the consideration transferred, which is measured at the acquisition date fair value, and the amount of any non-controlling
interests in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Group elects whether to measure the non-controlling interests in
the acquiree at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. Acquisition-related costs are
expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses.

The  Group  determines  that  it  has  acquired  a  business  when  the  acquired  set  of  activities  and  assets  include  an  input  and  a
substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The acquired process is considered
substantive if it is critical to the ability to continue producing outputs, and the inputs acquired include an organized workforce
with  the  necessary  skills,  knowledge,  or  experience  to  perform  that  process  or  it  significantly  contributes  to  the  ability  to
continue producing outputs and is considered unique or scarce or cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay
in the ability to continue producing outputs.

When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and
designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition
date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in host contracts by the acquiree.

Any  contingent  consideration  to  be  transferred  by  the  acquirer  will  be  recognized  at  fair  value  at  the  acquisition  date.
Contingent consideration classified as equity is not remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.
Contingent  consideration  classified  as  an  asset  or  liability  that  is  a  financial  instrument  and  within  the  scope  of  IFRS  9
Financial Instruments, is measured at fair value with the changes in fair value recognized in the statement of profit or loss in
accordance with IFRS 9. Other contingent consideration that is not within the scope of IFRS 9 is measured at fair value at
each reporting date with changes in fair value recognized in profit or loss.

Goodwill  is  initially  measured  at  cost  (being  the  excess  of  the  aggregate  of  the  consideration  transferred  and  the  amount
recognized for non-controlling interests and any previous interest held over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed).  If  the  fair  value  of  the  net  assets  acquired  is  in  excess  of  the  aggregate  consideration  transferred,  the  Group  re-
assesses  whether  it  has  correctly  identified  all  of  the  assets  acquired  and  all  of  the  liabilities  assumed  and  reviews  the
procedures used to measure the amounts to be recognized at the acquisition date. If the reassessment still results in an excess
of the fair value of net assets acquired over the aggregate consideration transferred, then the gain is recognized in profit or
loss.

2.8 Revenue recognition

Revenue from the sale of crude oil and gas is recognized at the point in time when control of the product is transferred to the
customer,  which  is  generally  when  the  product  is  physically  transferred  into  a  pipe  or  other  delivery  mechanism  and  the
customer accepts the product. Consequently, the Group’s performance obligations are considered to relate only to the sale of
crude  oil  and  gas,  with  each  barrel  of  crude  oil  equivalent  considered  to  be  a  separate  performance  obligation  under  the
contractual arrangements in place.

The Group’s sales of crude oil are priced based on market prices. The sales price is linked to US dollar denominated crude oil
international benchmarks, such as Brent, adjusted for certain marketing and quality discounts based on, among other things,
American Petroleum Institute (“API”) gravity, viscosity, sulphur content, delivery point and transport costs. The Group’s sales
of natural gas are priced based on long-term Gas Supply contracts with customers.

F-16

Table of Contents

Revenue  is  shown  net  of  VAT,  discounts  related  to  the  sale  and  overriding  royalties  due  to  the  ex-owners  of  oil  and  gas
properties where the royalty arrangements represent a retained working interest in the property. See Note 33.1.

2.9 Production and operating costs

Production and operating costs are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income on the accrual basis of accounting.
These costs include wages and salaries incurred to achieve the revenue for the year. Direct and indirect costs of raw materials
and consumables, rentals, and royalties and economic rights in cash are also included within this account.

2.10 Financial results

Financial results include interest expenses, interest income, bank charges, the amortization of financial assets and liabilities,
and  foreign  exchange  gains  and  losses.  The  Group  has  capitalized  the  borrowing  cost  directly  attributable  to  wells  and
facilities identified as qualifying assets, if applicable. Qualifying assets are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of
time to get ready for their intended use or sale. The capitalization rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs to be
capitalized, if any, is the weighted average interest rate applicable to the Group’s general borrowings.

2.11 Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less depreciation and impairment charges, if applicable. Historical
cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items; including provisions for asset retirement
obligation.

Oil and gas exploration and production activities are accounted for in accordance with the successful efforts method on a field
by field basis. The Group accounts for exploration and evaluation activities in accordance with IFRS 6, Exploration for and
Evaluation  of  Mineral  Resources,  capitalizing  exploration  and  evaluation  costs  until  such  time  as  the  economic  viability  of
producing  the  underlying  resources  is  determined.  Costs  incurred  prior  to  obtaining  legal  rights  to  explore  are  expensed
immediately to the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Exploration  and  evaluation  costs  may  include:  license  acquisition,  geological  and  geophysical  studies  (i.e.,  seismic),  direct
labor costs and drilling costs of exploratory wells. No depreciation and/or amortization are charged during the exploration and
evaluation  phase.  Upon  completion  of  the  evaluation  phase,  the  prospects  are  either  transferred  to  oil  and  gas  properties  or
charged  to  expense  (exploration  costs)  in  the  period  in  which  the  determination  is  made,  depending  on  whether  they  have
discovered reserves or not. If not developed, exploration and evaluation assets are written off after three years, unless it can be
clearly demonstrated that the carrying value of the investment is recoverable.

A  charge  of  US$  29,563,000  has  been  recognized  in  the  Consolidated  Statement  of  Income  within  the  ‘Write-off  of
unsuccessful exploration efforts’ line item (US$ 25,789,000 in 2022 and US$ 12,262,000 in 2021). See Note 20.

All field development costs are considered construction in progress until they are finished and capitalized within oil and gas
properties,  and  are  subject  to  depreciation  once  completed.  Such  costs  may  include  the  acquisition  and  installation  of
production  facilities,  development  drilling  costs  (including  dry  holes,  service  wells  and  seismic  surveys  for  development
purposes), project-related engineering and the acquisition costs of rights and concessions related to proved properties.

Workovers of wells made to develop reserves and/or increase production are capitalized as development costs. Maintenance
costs are charged to the Consolidated Statement of Income when incurred.

Capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties and production facilities and machinery are depreciated on a licensed area
by  the  licensed  area  basis,  using  the  unit  of  production  method,  based  on  commercial  proved  and  probable  oil  and  gas
reserves. The calculation of the “unit of production” depreciation considers estimated future finding and development costs
and is based on current year-end unescalated price levels. Changes in reserves and cost estimates are recognized prospectively.
Reserves are converted to equivalent units on the basis of approximate relative energy content.

F-17

Table of Contents

Depreciation of the remaining property, plant and equipment assets (i.e., furniture and vehicles) not directly associated with oil
and gas activities has been calculated by means of the straight-line method by applying such annual rates as required to write-
off their value at the end of their estimated useful lives. The useful lives range between 3 years and 10 years.

Depreciation is allocated in the Consolidated Statement of Income as a separate line to better follow the performance of the
business.

An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater
than its estimated recoverable amount (see Impairment of non-financial assets in Note 2.13).

2.12 Provisions and other long-term liabilities

Provisions for asset retirement obligations and other environmental liabilities, deferred income, restructuring obligations and
legal  claims  are  recognized  when  the  Group  has  a  present  legal  or  constructive  obligation  as  a  result  of  past  events,  it  is
probable  that  an  outflow  of  resources  will  be  required  to  settle  the  obligation,  and  the  amount  has  been  reliably  estimated.
Restructuring provisions, if any, comprise lease termination penalties and employee services termination payments.

Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in
the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as financial expense.

2.12.1 Asset Retirement Obligation

The Group records the fair value of the liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the wells are drilled.
When the liability is initially recorded, the Group capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-
lived  asset.  Over  time,  the  liability  is  accreted  to  its  present  value  at  each  reporting  period,  and  the  capitalized  cost  is
depreciated  over  the  estimated  useful  life  of  the  related  asset.  According  to  interpretations  and  the  application  of  current
legislation, and on the basis of the changes in technology and the variations in the costs of restoration necessary to protect the
environment, the Group has considered it appropriate to periodically re-evaluate future costs of well-capping. The effects of
this recalculation are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the period in which this recalculation is determined
and reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the corresponding property, plant and equipment asset.

2.12.2 Deferred Income

Government  grants  and  other  contributions  relating  to  the  purchase  of  property,  plant  and  equipment  are  included  in  non-
current liabilities as deferred income and they are credited to the Consolidated Statement of Income over the expected lives of
the related assets. Grants from the government are recognized at their fair value where there is a reasonable assurance that the
grant will be received and the Group will comply with all attached conditions.

2.13 Impairment of non-financial assets

Assets that are not subject to depreciation and/or amortization are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to
depreciation and/or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable.

An impairment loss is recognized for the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its recoverable amount. The recoverable
amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets
are  grouped  at  the  lowest  levels  for  which  there  are  separately  identifiable  cash  flows  (cash-generating  units),  generally  a
licensed  area.  Non-financial  assets  other  than  goodwill  that  suffered  impairment  are  reviewed  for  possible  reversal  of  the
impairment at each reporting date.

No asset should be kept as an exploration and evaluation asset for a period of more than three years, except if it can be clearly
demonstrated that the carrying value of the investment will be recoverable.

F-18

Table of Contents

Impairment  losses  were  recognized  for  US$  13,332,000  in  2023  (no  impairment  losses  were  recognized  in  2022  and  US$
4,334,000 were recognized in 2021). See Note 37. The write-offs are detailed in Note 20.

2.14 Lease contracts – Group as a lessee

The Group assesses at contract inception whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. That is, if the contract conveys the right to
control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

2.14.1 Right-of-use assets

The Group recognizes right-of-use assets at the commencement date of the lease. Right of use assets are measured at cost, less
any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, an adjusted for any measurement of lease liabilities.

The cost of right-of-use assets comprise the following:

● the amount of the initial measurement of lease liability,
● any lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received,
● any initial direct costs, and
● restoration costs.

The Group leases various offices, facilities, machinery and equipment. Lease contracts are typically made for fixed periods of
1 to 15 years but may have extension options. Lease terms are negotiated on an individual basis and contain a wide range of
different terms and conditions. Right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term
and the estimated useful lives of the assets.

If  ownership  of  the  leased  asset  transfers  to  the  Group  at  the  end  of  the  lease  term  or  the  cost  reflects  the  exercise  of  a
purchase option, depreciation is calculated using the estimated useful life of the asset. The right-of-use assets are also subject
to impairment.

2.14.2 Lease liabilities

At the commencement date of the lease, the Group recognizes lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease payments
to be made over the lease term. Lease liabilities include the net present value of the following lease payments:

● fixed payments, less any lease incentives receivable,
● variable lease payments that are based on an index or a rate,
● amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees,
● the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option, and
● payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising that option.

In  calculating  the  present  value,  the  lease  payments  are  discounted  using  the  interest  rate  implicit  in  the  lease.  If  that  rate
cannot  be  determined,  the  Group’s  incremental  borrowing  rate  is  used,  being  the  rate  that  the  lessee  would  have  to  pay  to
borrow  the  funds  necessary  to  obtain  an  asset  of  similar  value  in  a  similar  economic  environment  with  similar  terms  and
conditions. After the commencement date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and
reduced  for  the  lease  payments  made.  In  addition,  the  carrying  amount  of  lease  liabilities  is  remeasured  if  there  is  a
modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the lease payments (e.g., changes to future payments resulting from a
change in an index or rate used to determine such lease payments) or a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the
underlying asset.

2.14.3 Short-term leases and leases of low-value assets

The Group applies the short-term lease recognition exemption to its short-term leases of machinery and equipment (i.e., those
leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less from the commencement date and do not contain a purchase option). It also
applies the lease of low-value assets recognition exemption to leases of IT equipment and small items of

F-19

Table of Contents

office furniture that are considered to be low value. Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are
recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

2.15 Inventories

Inventories comprise crude oil and materials.

Crude oil is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Materials are measured at the lower of cost and recoverable
amount. The cost of materials and consumables is calculated at acquisition price with the addition of transportation and similar
costs. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

2.16 Current and deferred income tax

The  tax  expense  for  the  year  comprises  current  and  deferred  income  tax.  Income  tax  is  recognized  in  the  Consolidated
Statement of Income.

The  current  income  tax  charge  is  calculated  on  the  basis  of  the  tax  laws  enacted  or  substantially  enacted  at  the  financial
statements date in the countries where the Company’s subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. The computation of
the income tax expense involves the interpretation of applicable tax laws and regulations in many jurisdictions. The resolution
of  tax  positions  taken  by  the  Group,  through  negotiations  with  relevant  tax  authorities  or  through  litigation,  can  take
several years to complete and, in some cases, it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome.

Deferred income tax is recognized, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Deferred income tax is determined using
tax  rates  (and  laws)  that  have  been  enacted  or  substantially  enacted  as  of  the  financial  statements  date  and  are  expected  to
apply  when  the  related  deferred  income  tax  asset  is  realized,  or  the  deferred  income  tax  liability  is  settled.  In  addition,  the
Group  has  tax-loss  carry-forwards  in  certain  tax  jurisdictions  that  are  available  to  be  offset  against  future  taxable  profit.
However, deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available
against which the unused tax losses can be utilized. Management judgment is exercised in assessing whether this is the case.
To the extent that actual outcomes differ from management’s estimates, taxation charges or credits may arise in future periods.

Deferred  income  tax  liabilities  are  provided  on  taxable  temporary  differences  arising  from  investments  in  subsidiaries  and
joint  arrangements,  except  for  deferred  income  tax  liability  where  the  timing  of  the  reversal  of  the  temporary  difference  is
controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The Group
is  able  to  control  the  timing  of  dividends  from  its  subsidiaries  and  hence  does  not  expect  taxable  profit.  Hence  deferred
income tax is recognized in respect of the retained earnings of overseas subsidiaries only if at the date of the Consolidated
Financial Statements, dividends have been accrued as receivable or a binding agreement to distribute past earnings in future
has been entered into by the subsidiary. As mentioned above the Group does not expect that the temporary differences will
revert in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax balances are provided in full, with no discounting.

2.17 Non-current assets or disposal groups held for sale

Non-current  assets  or  disposal  groups  are  classified  as  held  for  sale  if  their  carrying  amount  will  be  recovered  principally
through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use and a sale is considered highly probable. They are measured at
the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, except for assets such as deferred tax assets, assets arising
from  employee  benefits,  financial  assets  and  investment  property  that  are  carried  at  fair  value  and  contractual  rights  under
insurance contracts, which are specifically exempt from this requirement.

An  impairment  loss  is  recognized  for  any  initial  or  subsequent  write-down  of  the  asset  or  disposal  group  to  fair  value  less
costs to sell. A gain is recognized for any subsequent increases in fair value less costs to sell of an asset or disposal group,

F-20

Table of Contents

but not in excess of any cumulative impairment loss previously recognized. A gain or loss not previously recognized by the
date of the sale of the non-current asset or disposal group is recognized at the date of derecognition.

Non-current assets (including those that are part of a disposal group) are not depreciated or amortized while they are classified
as held for sale. Interest and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale continue
to be recognized.

Non-current  assets  classified  as  held  for  sale  and  the  assets  of  a  disposal  group  classified  as  held  for  sale  are  presented
separately  from  the  other  assets  in  the  Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Position.  The  liabilities  of  a  disposal  group
classified as held for sale are presented separately from other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

As of December 31, 2023, the Group classified non-current assets and liabilities corresponding to the Chilean companies as
held for sale due to the divestment process that was agreed to in December 2023 and which closed in January 2024. See Note
36.1.

2.18 Financial assets

Financial assets are divided into the following categories: amortized cost; financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
and fair value through other comprehensive income. The classification depends on the Group’s business model for managing
the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash flows. The Group reclassifies debt investments when and only when
its business model for managing those assets changes.

All  financial  assets  not  at  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss  are  initially  recognized  at  fair  value,  plus  transaction  costs.
Transaction costs of financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss, if any, are expensed to profit or loss.

Derecognition of financial assets occurs when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments expire or are transferred
and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred. An assessment for impairment is undertaken at
each balance sheet date.

Interest and other cash flows resulting from holding financial assets are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income
when receivable, regardless of how the related carrying amount of financial assets is measured.

Amortized  cost  are  non-derivative  financial  assets  with  fixed  or  determinable  payments  that  are  not  quoted  in  an  active
market.  They  are  included  in  current  assets,  except  for  maturities  greater  than  twelve  months  after  the  balance  sheet  date.
These  are  classified  as  non-current  assets.  These  financial  assets  comprise  trade  and  other  receivables  and  cash  and  cash
equivalents  in  the  Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Position.  They  arise  when  the  Group  provides  money,  goods  or
services directly to a debtor with no intention of trading the receivables. These financial assets are subsequently measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment, if applicable.

Any  change  in  their  value  through  impairment  or  reversal  of  impairment  is  recognized  in  the  Consolidated  Statement  of
Income. All of the Group’s financial assets are classified as amortized cost.

2.19 Other financial assets

Non-current  other  financial  assets  include  contributions  made  for  environmental  obligations  according  to  a  Colombian  and
Brazilian government request and are restricted for those purposes.

Current  other  financial  assets  include  short-term  investments  with  original  maturities  up  to  twelve  months  and  over  three
months.

2.20 Impairment of financial assets

The Group assesses on a forward-looking basis the expected credit losses associated with its debt instruments. The impairment
methodology applied depends on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk. For trade

F-21

Table of Contents

receivables, the Group applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9, which requires expected lifetime losses to be
recognized from initial recognition of the receivables.

2.21 Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to
an  insignificant  risk  of  changes  in  value,  and  bank  overdrafts.  Bank  overdrafts,  if  any,  are  shown  within  borrowings  in  the
current liabilities section of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

2.22 Trade and other payables

Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of the business from
suppliers. Accounts  payable  are  classified  as  current  liabilities  if  payment  is  due  within  one  year  or  less  (or  in  the  normal
operating cycle of the business if longer). If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities.

Trade payables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest
method.

2.23 Derivatives and hedging activities

Derivative financial instruments are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as assets or liabilities and
initially and subsequently measured at fair value. They are presented as current assets or liabilities if they are expected to be
settled within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

The mark-to-market fair value of the Group's outstanding derivative instruments is based on independently provided market
rates and determined using standard valuation techniques, including the impact of counterparty credit risk and are within level
2 of the fair value hierarchy.

2.23.1 Cash flow hedges that qualify for hedge accounting

The  effective  portion  of  changes  in  the  fair  value  of  derivatives  that  are  designated  and  qualify  as  cash  flow  hedges  is
recognized in Other Reserves within Equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in
the Consolidated Statement of Income.

When forward contracts are used to hedge forecast transactions, the Group designates the change in fair value of the forward
contract  as  the  hedging  instrument.  Gains  or  losses  relating  to  the  effective  portion  of  the  change  in  the  fair  value  of  the
forward contracts are recognized in Other Reserves within Equity.

Where the hedged item subsequently results in the recognition of a non-financial asset, both the deferred hedging gains and
losses and the deferred time value of the option contracts or deferred forward points, if any, are included within the initial cost
of the asset.

When  a  hedging  instrument  expires,  or  is  sold  or  terminated,  or  when  a  hedge  no  longer  meets  the  criteria  for  hedge
accounting, any cumulative deferred gain or loss and deferred costs of hedging in Equity at that time remains in Equity until
the forecast transaction occurs, resulting in the recognition of a non-financial asset. When the forecast transaction is no longer
expected  to  occur,  the  cumulative  gain  or  loss  and  deferred  costs  of  hedging  that  were  reported  in  Equity  are  immediately
reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income.

For more information about derivatives designated as cash flow hedges please refer to Note 36.1 and Note 8.

2.23.2 Other Derivatives

F-22

Table of Contents

Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of any derivative instrument that
does not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized immediately in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

For  more  information  about  derivatives  related  to  commodity  risk  management  please  refer  to  Note  8  and  for  more
information about derivatives related to currency risk management please refer to Note 3 Currency risk.

2.24 Borrowings

Borrowings are obligations to pay cash and are recognized when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of
the instrument.

Borrowings  are  recognized  initially  at  fair  value,  net  of  transaction  costs  incurred.  Borrowings  are  subsequently  stated  at
amortized cost; any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the
Consolidated Statement of Income over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method.

Direct issue costs are charged to the Consolidated Statement of Income on an accrual basis using the effective interest method.

2.25 Share capital

Equity comprises the following:

● "Share capital" representing the nominal value of equity shares.
● "Share premium" representing the excess over nominal value of the fair value of consideration received for equity

shares, net of expenses of the share issuance.

● "Translation reserve" representing the differences arising from translation of investments in overseas subsidiaries.
● "Other reserves" representing:

-

-

the  difference  between  the  proceeds  from  transactions  with  non-controlling  interests  received  against  the
book value of the shares acquired in subsidiaries, and
the changes in the fair value of the effective portion of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.

● "Retained earnings (Accumulated losses)" representing:

-
-

accumulated earnings and losses, and
the equity element attributable to shares granted according to IFRS 2 but not issued at year end.

2.26 Share-based payment

The  Group  operates  a  number  of  equity-settled  share-based  compensation  plans  comprising  share  awards  payments  to
employees and other third-party contractors. Share-based payment transactions are measured in accordance with IFRS 2.

The fair value of the share awards payments is determined at the grant date by reference to the market value of the shares,
calculated using the Geometric Brownian Motion method or the Monte Carlo simulation, and recognized as an expense over
the vesting period.

Service  and  non-market  performance  conditions  are  not  taken  into  account  when  determining  the  grant  date  fair  value  of
awards, but the likelihood of the conditions being met is assessed as part of the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity
instruments that will ultimately vest. Market performance conditions are reflected within the grant date fair value. Any other
conditions attached to an award, but without an associated service requirement, are considered to be non-vesting conditions.
Non-vesting conditions are reflected in the fair value of an award and lead to an immediate expensing of an award unless there
are also service and/or performance conditions.

No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest because non-market performance and/or service conditions
have not been met. Where awards include a market or non-vesting condition, the transactions are treated as vested irrespective
of whether the market or non-vesting condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are
satisfied.

F-23

Table of Contents

At  each  reporting  date,  the  entity  revises  its  estimates  of  the  number  of  options  that  are  expected  to  vest.  It  recognizes  the
impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with a corresponding adjustment
to equity.

When  the  awards  are  exercised,  the  Company  issues  new  shares.  The  proceeds  received  net  of  any  directly  attributable
transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium.

Note 3     Financial Instruments-risk management

The Group is exposed through its operations to the following financial risks:

● Currency risk
● Price risk
● Credit risk– concentration
● Funding and liquidity risk
● Interest rate risk
● Capital risk

The  policy  for  managing  these  risks  is  set  by  the  Board  of  Directors.  Certain  risks  are  managed  centrally,  while  others  are
managed locally following guidelines communicated from the corporate department. The policy for each of the above risks is
described in more detail below.

Currency risk

In Colombia, Ecuador, Chile and Argentina the functional currency is the US Dollar. The fluctuation of the local currencies of
these countries against the US Dollar, except for Ecuador where the local currency is the US Dollar, does not impact the loans,
costs  and  revenue  held  in  US  Dollars;  but  it  does  impact  receivables  or  payables  originated  in  local  currency  mainly
corresponding to VAT and income tax.

The Group minimises the local currency positions in Colombia, Chile and Argentina by seeking to balance local and foreign
currency  assets  and  liabilities.  However,  tax  receivables  (VAT)  seldom  match  with  local  currency  liabilities. Therefore,  the
Group maintains a net exposure to them, except for what it is described below.

From time to time, the Group enters into derivative financial instruments in order to anticipate any currency fluctuation with
respect to income taxes to be paid during the first half of the following year. No currency risk management contracts were in
place as of December 31, 2023, and onwards. In January 2023, GeoPark entered into derivative financial instruments (zero-
premium  collars)  with  local  banks  in  Colombia,  for  an  amount  equivalent  to  US$  38,000,000  in  order  to  anticipate  any
currency fluctuation with respect to a portion of the estimated income taxes to be paid in April and June 2023.

Most of the Group's assets held in those countries are associated with oil and gas productive assets. Those assets, even in the
local markets, are generally settled in US Dollar equivalents.

During 2023, the Colombian Peso revalued by 21% (devalued by 21% and 16% in 2022 and 2021, respectively), the Chilean
Peso  devalued  by  3%  (1%  and  19%  in  2022  and  2021,  respectively),  and  the Argentine  Peso  devalued  by  356%  (72%  and
22% in 2022 and 2021, respectively), all against the US Dollar.

If the Colombian Peso, the Chilean Peso, and the Argentine Peso had each devalued an additional 10% against the US dollar,
with  all  other  variables  held  constant,  post-tax  profit  for  the  year  would  have  been  higher  by  US$  13,971,000  (US$
14,695,000 in 2022 and US$ 9,070,000 in 2021).

In Brazil, the functional currency is the local currency, which is the Brazilian Real. The fluctuation of the US Dollars against
the Brazilian Real does not impact the loans, costs and revenues held in Brazilian Real; but it does impact the

F-24

Table of Contents

balances denominated in US Dollars. Such is the case of the provision for asset retirement obligation and the lease liabilities.

During 2023, the Brazilian Real revalued by 7% against the US Dollar (revalued by 7% in 2022 and devalued by 7% 2021). If
the Brazilian Real had devalued an additional 10% against the US dollar, with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit
for the year would have been lower by US$ 728,000 (US$ 726,000 in 2022 and US$ 780,000 in 2021).

As  currency  rate  changes  between  the  US  Dollar  and  the  local  currencies,  the  Group  recognizes  gains  and  losses  in  the
Consolidated Statement of Income.

Price risk

The realized oil price for the Group is linked to US dollar denominated crude oil international benchmarks. The market price
of  this  commodity  is  subject  to  significant  volatility  and  has  historically  fluctuated  widely  in  response  to  relatively  minor
changes in the global supply and demand for oil, the geopolitical landscape, armed conflicts, the economic conditions and a
variety of additional factors. The main factors affecting realized prices for gas sales vary across countries with some closely
linked to international references while others are more domestically driven.

In Colombia, the realized oil price is linked to either the Vasconia crude reference price, a marker broadly used in the Llanos
Basin, or the Oriente crude reference price, a marker broadly used for crude sales in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, for the crude oil of
the  Putumayo  Basin  that  is  transported  through  Ecuador.  In  both  basins,  the  reference  price  is  then  adjusted  for  certain
marketing  and  quality  discounts  based  on,  among  other  things, API,  viscosity,  sulphur  content,  delivery  point  and  transport
costs.

In Ecuador, the oil price is linked to Brent and adjusted by a differential that varies month to month and resembles Oriente
crude reference.

In Brazil, prices for gas produced in the Manati Field are based on a long-term off-take contract with Petrobras. The price of
gas sold under this contract is denominated in Brazilian Real and is adjusted annually for inflation pursuant to the Brazilian
General Market Price Index (Indice Geral de Preços do Mercado), or IGPM.

In Chile, the oil price was linked to Dated Brent minus certain marketing and quality discounts such as, API, sulphur content
and others. The gas price, under a long-term Gas Supply Contract with Methanex, was determined by a formula that considers
a basket of international methanol prices, including US and European price indices.

If  oil  and  gas  prices  had  fallen  by  10%  compared  to  actual  prices  during  the  year,  with  all  other  variables  held  constant,
considering  the  impact  of  the  derivative  contracts  in  place,  post-tax  profit  for  the  year  would  have  been  lower  by  US$
42,393,000 (US$ 47,330,000 in 2022 and US$ 17,899,000 in 2021).

GeoPark  seeks  to  partially  mitigates  its  exposure  to  crude  oil  price  volatility  using  derivatives  by  hedging  a  portion  of  its
production for a limited period going forward. The Group uses a combination of options to manage its exposure to commodity
price  risk,  which  considers  forecasted  production  and  budget  price  levels,  among  other  factors.  GeoPark  has  also  obtained
credit lines from different counterparties to minimize the potential cash exposure of the derivative contracts (see Note 8).

Credit risk– concentration

The  Group’s  credit  risk  relates  mainly  to  accounts  receivable  where  the  credit  risks  correspond  to  the  recognized  values  of
commodities sold or hedged. GeoPark considers that there is no significant risk associated to the Group’s major customers and
hedging counterparties.

In  Colombia,  GeoPark  allocates  its  sales  on  a  competitive  basis  to  industry  leading  participants  including  traders  and  other
producers.  During  2023,  the  oil  and  gas  production  was  sold  to  three  clients  which  concentrate  96%  of  the  Colombian
subsidiaries’ revenue, accounting for 89% of the consolidated revenue (97% and 99% of the Colombian subsidiaries’

F-25

Table of Contents

revenue, accounting for 90% and 89% of the consolidated revenue in 2022 and 2021). Delivery points include wellhead and
other  locations  on  the  Colombian  pipeline  system  for  the  Llanos  Basin  production.  The  Putumayo  Basin  production  is
delivered to clients FOB in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, and to the Colombian pipeline system in case of contingencies in Ecuador
that affect the transport through the Ecuadorian pipeline system. The outstanding contracts for Colombian production extend
through the first half of 2024. GeoPark manages its counterparty credit risk associated to sales contracts by periodic evaluation
of the counterparties’ credit profile and, in certain contracts, including early payment conditions to minimize the exposure.

In Ecuador, oil is transported through the Ecuadorian pipeline system, with Esmeraldas as the delivery point, and 100% of the
sales are exported on a competitive basis to industry leading participants including traders and other producers. Sales of crude
oil in Ecuador accounted for 3% of the consolidated revenue in 2023 (1% in 2022).

In Brazil, all the gas from the Manati Block is sold to Petrobras, the State-owned company, which is also the operator of the
Manati Field (2% of the consolidated revenue in 2023 and 2022, and 3% in 2021).

In Chile, the oil production was sold to ENAP, the State-owned oil and gas company (1% of the consolidated revenue in 2023,
2022 and 2021), and the gas production was sold to the local subsidiary of Methanex, a Canadian public company (1% of the
consolidated revenue in 2023 and 2022, and 2% in 2021).

GeoPark  Limited  has  entered  into  a  crude  purchase  agreement  with  an  oil  producer  in  the  Putumayo  Basin.  The  volumes
purchased are transported and exported alongside the Group’s Putumayo Basin production. Sales of crude oil purchased from
third parties accounted for 1% of the consolidated revenue in 2023 and 2022.

The forementioned companies all have a good credit standing and despite the concentration of the credit risk, the Directors do
not consider there to be a significant collection risk.

GeoPark executes oil prices hedges via over-the-counter derivatives. Should oil prices drop, the Group could stand to collect
from  its  counterparties  under  the  derivative  contracts. The  Group’s  hedging  counterparties  are  leading  financial  institutions
and trading companies; therefore the Directors do not consider there to be a significant collection risk. See disclosure in Notes
8 and 25.

Funding and Liquidity risk

In  the  past,  the  Group  has  been  able  to  raise  capital  through  different  sources  of  funding  including  equity,  strategic
partnerships and financial debt.

The  Group  is  positioned  at  the  end  of  2023  with  a  cash  balance  of  US$  133,036,000,  and  has  access  to  a  US$  80,000,000
senior unsecured credit facility with Banco BTG Pactual S.A. and Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior S.A., and to
US$ 179,600,000 in uncommitted credit lines, and its total indebtedness matures in January 2027. In addition, the Group has a
large portfolio of attractive and largely discretional projects - both oil and gas - in multiple countries with over 38,000 boepd
in production at year end. This scale and positioning permit the Group to protect its financial condition and selectively allocate
capital to the optimal projects subject to prevailing macroeconomic conditions.

The  Indentures  governing  the  Company  Notes  2027  include  incurrence  test  covenants  related  to  compliance  with  certain
thresholds  of  Net  Debt  to  Adjusted  EBITDA  ratio  and  Adjusted  EBITDA  to  Interest  ratio.  Failure  to  comply  with  the
incurrence test covenants does not trigger an event of default. However, this situation may limit the Group’s capacity to incur
additional  indebtedness,  as  specified  in  the  indentures  governing  the  Notes. As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated  Financial
Statements, the Group is in compliance with all the indentures’ provisions and covenants.

Interest rate risk

The Group’s interest rate risk could arise from long-term borrowings issued at variable rates, which would expose the Group
to interest rate risk.

F-26

Table of Contents

The Group does not currently face interest rate risk on its US$ 500,000,000 Notes which carry a fixed rate coupon of 5.50%
per  annum  and  mature  in  January  2027.  Consequently,  the  accruals  and  interest  payments  are  not  substantially  affected  by
changes in prevailing interest rates.

As of December 31, 2023, there were no outstanding borrowings affected by a variable rate.

Capital risk

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to
provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the
cost of capital. The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions,
operating risks and working capital requirements. To maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Group may issue or buy back
shares, change its dividend policy, raise or refinance debt and/or adjust its capital expenditures to manage its operating and
growth  objectives.  Additionally,  the  Group  utilizes  a  planning,  budgeting  and  forecasting  process  to  help  determine  and
monitor the funds needed to maintain appropriate liquidity for operational, capital and financial needs.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, GeoPark is in compliance with the debt covenant ratios associated with the Company´s
Notes due 2027. See Note 27.

The following table summarizes the Group’s capital structure balances:

Amounts in US$‘000
Total Equity
Net Debt (a)
Working capital (b)

2023
176,020
367,945
39,184

2022
115,585
368,799
8,989

(a) Calculated as total borrowings (including ‘current and non-current borrowings’ as shown in the Consolidated Statement of

Financial Position) less cash and cash equivalents.
(b) Calculated as ‘current assets’ less ‘current liabilities’.

Note 4     Accounting estimates and assumptions

Estimates and assumptions are used in preparing financial statements. Although these estimates are based on management’s
best knowledge of current events and actions, actual results may differ. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated
and  are  based  on  historical  experience  and  other  factors,  including  expectations  of  future  events  that  are  believed  to  be
reasonable under the circumstances.

The key estimates and assumptions used in these Consolidated Financial Statements are noted below:

● The process of estimating reserves is complex. It requires significant judgements and decisions based on available
geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. The estimation of economically recoverable oil and natural
gas reserves and related future net cash flows was performed based on the Reserve Report as of December 31, 2023,
prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton Corp., an independent international oil and gas consulting firm based in
Dallas, Texas, in line with the principles contained in the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and the Petroleum
Resources Management Reporting System (PRMS) framework.

It incorporates many factors and assumptions including:
o
o
o
o
o
o

expected reservoir characteristics based on geological, geophysical and engineering assessments;
future production rates based on historical performance and expected future operating and investment activities;
future oil and gas prices and quality differentials;
assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies;
tax rates by jurisdiction; and
future development and operating costs.

F-27

   
   
Table of Contents

Management believes these factors and assumptions are reasonable based on the information available to them at the
time of preparing the estimates. However, these estimates may change substantially as additional data from ongoing
development activities and production performance becomes available and as economic conditions impacting oil and
gas prices and costs change.

Such changes may impact the Group’s reported financial position and results, which include: (a) the carrying value of
exploration and evaluation assets; oil and gas properties and other property, plant and equipment; may be affected due
to changes in estimated future cash flows, (b) depreciation and amortization charges in the Consolidated Statement of
Income may change where such charges are determined using the unit of production method, or where the useful life
of  the  related  assets  change,  (c)  provisions  for  abandonment  may  require  revision  -where  changes  to  reserves
estimates affect expectations about when such activities will occur and the associated cost of these activities- and, (d)
the  recognition  and  carrying  value  of  deferred  income  tax  assets  may  change  due  to  changes  in  the  judgements
regarding the existence of such assets and in estimates of the likely recovery of such assets.

● Cash  flows  estimates  for  impairment  assessments  of  non-financial  assets  require  assumptions  about  three  primary
elements:  future  prices,  reserves  and  discount  rate.  Estimates  of  future  prices  require  significant  judgments  about
highly  uncertain  future  events.  Historically,  oil  and  gas  prices  have  exhibited  significant  volatility.  The  Group’s
forecasts for oil and gas revenues are based on prices derived from future price forecasts amongst industry analysts
and internal assessments. Estimates of future cash flows are generally based on assumptions of long-term prices and
operating  and  development  costs.  Given  the  significant  assumptions  required  and  the  possibility  that  actual
conditions may differ, management considers the assessment of impairment to be a critical accounting estimate (see
Note 37).

● The Group adopted the successful efforts method of accounting. The Management of the Group makes assessments
and estimates regarding whether an exploration and evaluation asset should continue to be carried forward as such
when  insufficient  information  exists.  This  assessment  is  made  on  a  quarterly  basis  considering  the  advice  from
qualified experts.

The application of the Group’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires judgement to
determine  whether  future  economic  benefits  are  likely  from  future  either  exploitation  or  sale,  or  whether  activities
have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves. The determination of
reserves and resources is, in itself, an estimation process that involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on
how the resources are classified. These estimates directly impact when the Group defers exploration and evaluation
expenditure. The deferral policy requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions about future events
and circumstances, in particular, whether an economically viable extraction operation can be established. Any such
estimates  and  assumptions  may  change  as  new  information  becomes  available.  If,  after  expenditure  is  capitalized,
information  becomes  available  suggesting  that  the  recovery  of  the  expenditure  is  unlikely,  the  relevant  capitalized
amount  is  written-off  in  the  Consolidated  Statement  of  Income  in  the  period  when  the  new  information  becomes
available.

● Oil  and  gas  assets  held  in  property  plant  and  equipment  are  mainly  depreciated  on  a  unit  of  production  (“UOP”)
basis at a rate calculated by reference to proven and probable reserves and incorporating the estimated future cost of
developing  and  extracting  those  reserves.  Future  development  costs  are  estimated  using  assumptions  as  to  the
numbers  of  wells  required  to  produce  those  reserves,  the  cost  of  the  wells  and  future  production  facilities.  This
results in a depreciation charge proportional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining production from the block.

The life of each item, which is assessed at least annually, has regard to both its physical life limitations and present
assessments  of  economically  recoverable  reserves  of  the  block  at  which  the  asset  is  located.  These  calculations
require the use of estimates and assumptions, including the amount of recoverable reserves and estimates of future
capital  expenditure.  The  calculation  of  the  UOP  rate  of  depreciation  will  be  impacted  to  the  extent  that  actual
production in the future is different from current forecast production based on total proved and probable reserves, or
future capital expenditure estimates change. Changes to proved and probable reserves could arise due to

F-28

Table of Contents

changes in the factors or assumptions used in estimating reserves, including: (a) the effect on proved and probable
reserves  of  differences  between  actual  commodity  prices  and  commodity  price  assumptions  and  (b)  unforeseen
operational issues.

● Obligations  related  to  the  abandonment  of  wells  once  operations  are  terminated  may  result  in  the  recognition  of
significant  obligations.  Estimating  the  future  abandonment  costs  is  difficult  and  requires  management  to  make
estimates and judgments because most of the obligations are many years in the future. Technologies and costs are
constantly  changing  as  well  as  political,  environmental,  safety  and  public  relations  considerations. The  Group  has
adopted the following criterion for recognizing well plugging and abandonment related costs: the present value of
future  costs  necessary  for  well  plugging  and  abandonment  is  calculated  for  each  area  at  the  present  value  of  the
estimated  future  expenditure. The  liabilities  recognized  are  based  upon  estimated  future  abandonment  costs,  wells
subject to abandonment, time to abandonment, and future inflation rates.

The expected timing, extent and amount of expenditure may also change, for example, in response to changes in oil
and  gas  reserves  or  changes  in  laws  and  regulations  or  their  interpretation.  Therefore,  significant  estimates  and
assumptions  are  made  in  determining  the  provision  for  decommissioning.  As  a  result,  there  could  be  significant
adjustments to the provisions established which would affect future financial results.

The provision at reporting date represents management’s best estimate of the present value of the future abandonment
costs required.

● From time to time, the Group may be subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings that arise in the normal
course of business, including employment, commercial, tax, environmental, safety and health matters. For example,
from  time  to  time,  the  Group  receives  notice  of  environmental,  health  and  safety  violations.  Based  on  what  the
Group’s Management currently knows, such claims are not expected to have a material impact on the Consolidated
Financial Statements.

Note 5     Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows shows the Group’s cash flows for the year for operating, investing and financing
activities and the change in cash and cash equivalents during the year.

Cash flows from operating activities are computed from the results for the year adjusted for non-cash operating items, changes
in net working capital and corporate tax. Income tax paid is presented as a separate item under operating activities.

Cash  flows  from  investing  activities  include  payments  in  connection  with  the  purchase  and  sale  of  property,  plant  and
equipment and cash flows relating to the purchase and sale of enterprises to third parties, if any.

Cash flows from financing activities include changes in equity and proceeds from borrowings and repayment of loans.

Cash and cash equivalents include bank overdraft, if any, and liquid funds with a term of less than three months.

The following chart describes non-cash transactions related to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:

Amounts in US$‘000
Increase (Decrease) in asset retirement obligation
Increase (Decrease) in provisions for other long-term liabilities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Additions / changes in estimates of right-of-use assets

2023
7,374
2,370
(7,864)
137

2022
(4,942)
(2,616)
7,864
22,462

2021

(651)
(443)
—
5,288

F-29

   
   
   
Table of Contents

Changes in working capital shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are disclosed as follows:

Amounts in US$‘000
(Increase) Decrease in Inventories
Decrease (Increase) in Trade receivables
Increase in Prepayments and other receivables and Other assets (a)
Increase (Decrease) in Trade and other payables

2023
(1,330)
6,820
(33,328)
1,413
(26,425)

2022
(6,694)
(1,425)
(30,929)
(999)
(40,047)

2021
1,241
(23,290)
(13,817)
26,515
(9,351)

(a)

Includes withholding taxes from clients for US$ 27,558,000, US$ 27,256,000 and US$ 16,361,000, in 2023, 2022 and
2021, respectively.

The following chart shows the movements in the borrowings and lease liabilities for each of the periods presented:

Amounts in US$‘000
As of January 1, 2021
Proceeds from borrowings
Debt issuance costs paid
Addition to lease liabilities
Accrual of borrowing's interests
Exchange difference
Foreign currency translation
Unwinding of discount
Principal paid
Interest paid
Borrowings cancellation costs
Borrowings cancellation and other costs paid
Lease payments
As of December 31, 2021
Addition to lease liabilities
Accrual of borrowing's interests
Exchange difference
Foreign currency translation
Unwinding of discount
Principal paid
Interest paid
Borrowings cancellation costs
Borrowings cancellation and other costs paid
Lease payments
As of December 31, 2022
Addition to lease liabilities
Accrual of borrowing's interests
Exchange difference
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale (Note 36.1)
Foreign currency translation
Unwinding of discount
Interest paid
Lease payments
As of December 31, 2023

F-30

Borrowings

784,586

172,174

(2,019)

—

44,323

(581)

(265)

—

(274,934)

(42,592)

6,308

(12,908)

—

674,092

—

36,360

—

203

—

(172,522)

(36,514)

5,141

(9,118)

—

497,642

—

30,839

—

—

—

—

(27,500)

—

500,981

Lease
Liabilities

22,347

—

—

5,288

—

(365)

(461)

1,453

—

—

—

—

(7,518)

20,744

22,462

—

Total

806,933

172,174

(2,019)

5,288

44,323

(946)

(726)

1,453

(274,934)

(42,592)

6,308

(12,908)

(7,518)

694,836

22,462

36,360

(6,426)

(6,426)

284

2,838

—

—

—

—

(7,851)

32,051

137

—

7,061

(26)

174

3,168

—

(10,267)

32,298

487

2,838

(172,522)

(36,514)

5,141

(9,118)

(7,851)

529,693

137

30,839

7,061

(26)

174

3,168

(27,500)

(10,267)

533,279

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Note 6     Segment information

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-
maker.  The  chief  operating  decision-maker,  who  is  responsible  for  allocating  resources  and  assessing  performance  of  the
operating  segments,  has  been  identified  as  the  Executive  Committee.  This  committee  is  integrated  by  the  Chief  Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technical Officer, Chief Exploration Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy,
Sustainability and Legal Officer and Chief People Officer. This committee reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to
assess performance and allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segments based on these reports. The
committee considers the business from a geographic perspective.

The  Executive  Committee  assesses  the  performance  of  the  operating  segments  based  on  a  measure  of Adjusted  EBITDA.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as profit (loss) for the period (determined as if IFRS 16 Leases has not been adopted), before net
finance  cost,  income  tax,  depreciation,  amortization,  certain  non-cash  items  such  as  impairments  and  write-offs  of
unsuccessful exploration efforts, accrual of share-based payment, unrealized result on commodity risk management contracts,
geological  and  geophysical  expenses  allocated  to  capitalized  projects,  and  other  non-recurring  events.  Other  information
provided to the Executive Committee is measured in a manner consistent with that in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Segment areas (geographical segments)

Amounts in US$ ‘000
2023
Revenue

Sale of crude oil
Sale of purchased crude oil
Sale of gas
Commodity risk management contracts
designated as cash flow hedges

Production and operating costs

Royalties in cash
Economic rights in cash
Share-based payment
Other operating costs

Adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation
Recognition of impairment losses
Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
Total assets
Employees (average) (a)
Employees at year end (a)

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile (b)

    Argentina     Corporate    

Total

14,019
490
—
13,529

—
(4,946)
(1,096)
—
—
(3,850)
6,374
(2,332)
—
—
27,891
4
4

15,644
5,052
—
10,592

—
(8,226)
(548)
—
(72)
(7,606)
4,952
(9,815)
(13,332)
—
36,192
33
27

—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,620)
(22)
—
—
357
18
15

5,464
—
5,464
—

—
(4,666)
—
—
—
(4,666)
(8,838)
(3)
—
—
15,873
8
7

756,625
726,947
5,464
25,024

(810)
(232,325)
(12,845)
(72,032)
(750)
(146,698)
451,862
(120,934)
(13,332)
(29,563)
1,016,549
469
470

702,401
702,308
—
903

(810)
(204,245)
(11,201)
(72,032)
(671)
(120,341)
446,835
(101,666)
—
(29,563)
895,900
400
412

19,097
19,097
—
—

—
(10,242)
—
—
(7)
(10,235)
5,159
(7,096)
—
—
40,336
6
5

F-31

Table of Contents

Amounts in US$ ‘000
2022

Revenue

Sale of crude oil

Sale of purchased crude oil

Sale of gas

Realized loss on commodity risk
management contracts
Production and operating costs

Royalties in cash
Economic rights in cash

Share-based payment
Other operating costs

Adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation
Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
Total assets
Employees (average) (a)
Employees at year end (a)

Amounts in US$ ‘000
2021
Revenue

Sale of crude oil
Sale of gas

Realized loss on commodity risk
management contracts
Production and operating costs

Royalties in cash
Economic rights in cash
Share-based payment
Other operating costs

Adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation
Recognition of impairment losses
Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
Total assets
Employees (average) (a)
Employees at year end (a)

(a) Unaudited.
(b) Divested in January 2024. See Note 36.1.

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile (b)

    Argentina     Corporate    

Total

978,423
977,184

—

1,239

(83,244)
(327,626)

(60,314)
(188,989)

(843)
(77,480)
525,593
(78,775)
(21,318)
797,390
362
388

10,671
10,671

—

—

—
(3,220)

—
—

(10)
(3,210)
4,197
(788)
(4,471)
35,690
7
8

19,873
796

—

29,196
14,460

—

19,077

14,736

—
(5,299)

(1,546)
—

—
(3,753)
11,654
(2,796)
—
34,329
5
4

—
(14,126)

(1,165)
—

(103)
(12,858)
11,753
(14,076)
—
63,379
53
49

1,962
1,664

—

298

—
(1,579)

(273)
—

1
(1,307)
(3,643)
(254)
—
1,296
33
24

9,454

1,049,579
— 1,004,775

9,454

—

—
(7,929)

—
—

—
(7,929)
(8,775)
(3)
—
41,891
9
9

9,454

35,350

(83,244)
(359,779)

(63,298)
(188,989)

(955)
(106,537)
540,779
(96,692)
(25,789)
973,975
469
482

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile (b)

    Argentina     Corporate     Total

618,268
616,133
2,135

(109,654)
(178,384)
(33,385)
(72,956)
(334)
(71,709)
294,847
(61,279)
—
(7,827)
689,401
308
321

—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,071)
(200)
—
—
7,782
8
3

20,109
661
19,448

—
(4,596)
(1,575)
(67)
—
(2,954)
12,569
(4,082)
—
—
38,846
4
4

21,471
6,297
15,174

—
(11,050)
(770)
—
(31)
(10,249)
7,639
(14,275)
(17,641)
(4,435)
71,515
55
52

28,695
24,468
4,227

—
(18,760)
(4,270)
—
26
(14,516)
2,124
(9,130)
13,307
—
38,111
92
74

—
—
—

688,543
647,559
40,984

— (109,654)
— (212,790)
(40,000)
—
(73,023)
—
(339)
—
(99,428)
—
300,800
(14,308)
(88,969)
(3)
(4,334)
—
(12,262)
—
895,741
50,086
476
9
463
9

In 2023, approximately 89% of capital expenditure was incurred by Colombia (82% in 2022 and 93% in 2021) and 11% was
incurred by Ecuador (11% in 2022 and 4% in 2021). No capital expenditure was incurred by Chile in 2023 (7% in 2022 and
3% in 2021).

F-32

Table of Contents

A reconciliation of total Adjusted EBITDA to total profit (loss) before income tax is provided as follows:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Adjusted EBITDA
Unrealized gain on commodity risk management contracts
Depreciation (a)
Share-based payment
Impairment and write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts, net
Lease accounting - IFRS 16
Others (b)
Operating profit
Financial expenses
Financial income
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
Profit before tax

2023
451,862
—
(120,934)
(7,328)
(42,895)
10,267
(20,065)
270,907
(45,815)
6,237
(16,820)
214,509

2022
540,779
13,023
(96,692)
(11,038)
(25,789)
7,851
943
429,077
(57,073)
3,180
19,725
394,909

2021
300,800
463
(88,969)
(6,621)
(16,596)
7,518
(10,786)
185,809
(64,112)
1,652
5,049
128,398

(a) Net of capitalized costs for oil stock included in Inventories.
(b)

Includes  allocation  to  capitalized  projects.  In  2023,  also  includes  termination  and  other  costs  incurred  because  of  the
divestment  process  in  Chile,  including  a  provision  for  investment  commitments  maintained  by  GeoPark  after  the
transaction,  for  a  total  amount  of  US$  9,742,000  (see  Note  36.1),  together  with  the  amount  paid  for  transferring  the
working interest in the Los Parlamentos Block in Argentina to the joint operation partner for US$ 7,023,000 (see Note
36.2),  and  others.  In  2022,  also  includes  gain  from  the  sale  of  the Aguada  Baguales,  El  Porvenir  and  Puesto Touquet
Blocks in Argentina. In 2021, also includes termination costs and write-down of tax credits in Argentina.

Note 7     Revenue

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Sale of crude oil
Sale of purchased crude oil
Sale of gas
Commodity risk management contracts designated as cash flow hedges (a)

2023
726,947
5,464
25,024
(810)
756,625

2022
1,004,775
9,454
35,350
—
1,049,579

2021
647,559
—
40,984
—
688,543

(a) Realized result on commodity risk management contracts designated as cash flow hedges. See Note 8.

Note 8     Commodity risk management contracts

The  Group  has  entered  into  derivative  financial  instruments  to  manage  its  exposure  to  oil  price  risk.  These  derivatives  are
zero-premium collars and were placed with major financial institutions and commodity traders. The Group entered into the
derivatives under ISDA Master Agreements and Credit Support Annexes, which provide credit lines for collateral posting thus
alleviating  possible  liquidity  needs  under  the  instruments  and  protect  the  Group  from  potential  non-performance  risk  by  its
counterparties.

The  Group’s  derivatives  that  hedge  cash  flows  from  the  sales  of  crude  oil  for  periods  through  December  31,  2022,  were
accounted  for  as  non-hedge  derivatives  and  therefore  all  changes  in  the  fair  values  of  these  derivative  contracts  were
recognized immediately as gains or losses in the results of the periods in which they occurred as part of the ‘Commodity risk
management contracts’ line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The table below summarizes the results on non-hedge derivative commodity risk management contracts:

Realized loss on commodity risk management contracts
Unrealized gain on commodity risk management contracts

2023

2022

— (83,244)
— 13,023
— (70,221)

2021
(109,654)
463
(109,191)

F-33

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

The  Group’s  derivatives  that  hedge  cash  flows  from  the  sales  of  crude  oil  for  periods  from  January  1,  2023,  onwards  are
designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of changes in the fair values of these derivative contracts are
recognized  in  ‘Other  Reserves’  within  ‘Equity’.  The  gain  or  loss  relating  to  the  ineffective  portion,  if  any,  is  recognized
immediately as gains or losses in the results of the periods in which they occur. The amount accumulated in ‘Other Reserves’
is  reclassified  to  profit  or  loss  as  a  reclassification  adjustment  in  the  same  period  or  periods  during  which  the  hedged  cash
flows affect profit or loss as part of the ‘Revenue’ line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The following table presents the Group’s production hedged during the year ended December 31, 2023, and for the following
periods as a consequence of the derivative contracts in force as of December 31, 2023:

Period

January 1, 2023 - March 31, 2023
April 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023
July 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023
October 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023
January 1, 2024 - March 31, 2024
April 1, 2024 - June 30, 2024
July 1, 2024 - September 30, 2024
October 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024

Reference
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT
ICE BRENT

Type
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars
Zero Premium Collars

    Volume bbl/d     Weighted average price US$/bbl

9,500
10,000
9,000
9,000
8,500
9,000
7,000
1,000

66.05 Put 112.59 Call
69.25 Put 110.56 Call
70.00 Put 94.69 Call
69.44 Put 91.82 Call
65.59 Put 92.04 Call
67.50 Put 96.99 Call
66.43 Put 99.32 Call
70.00 Put 96.00 Call

Note 9     Production and operating costs

Amounts in US$ '000
Staff costs (Note 11)
Share-based payment (Note 11)
Royalties in cash (a)
Economic rights in cash (a)
Well and facilities maintenance
Operation and maintenance
Consumables (b)
Equipment rental
Transportation costs
Field camp
Safety and insurance costs
Personnel transportation
Consultant fees
Gas plant costs
Non-operated blocks costs (c)
Crude oil stock variation
Purchased crude oil
Other costs

2023
13,889
750
12,845
72,032
26,089
8,143
37,556
4,314
5,850
6,546
5,487
3,363
2,291
1,865
20,421
2,004
4,666
4,214
232,325

2022
13,114
955
63,298
188,989
20,779
6,545
21,789
7,580
4,021
4,070
3,745
2,480
2,133
1,680
12,650
(6,449)
7,929
4,471
359,779

2021
16,655
339
40,000
73,023
17,989
7,826
19,270
8,127
3,383
4,386
4,216
2,397
1,732
2,596
4,941
1,271
—
4,639
212,790

(a) Royalties  and  economic  rights  in  Colombia  are  payable  to  the  National  Hydrocarbons  Agency  (“ANH”)  and  are
determined on a field-by-field basis depending on different variables such as crude quality and price levels, among others
(see Note 33). During 2023, the mix of royalties and economic rights paid “in-kind” increased as compared to royalties
and economic rights paid ‘in-cash”. These changes caused variations in the ‘royalties in cash’ and ‘economic rights in
cash’  line  items  from  year  to  year,  which  are  compensated  by  variations  in  the  quantities  of  oil  sales  impacting  the
‘Revenue’ line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(b) Consumables include energy costs of US$ 26,348,000 in the Llanos 34 Block in 2023 (US$ 6,086,000 in 2022) due to a

drought that affected the energy matrix in Colombia as a result of decreased availability of hydroelectric power.

(c) Non-operated  block  costs  show  the  increase  in  activities  in  the  CPO-5  and  Perico  Blocks  in  Colombia  and  Ecuador,

respectively.

F-34

   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Note 10     Depreciation

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Oil and gas properties
Production facilities and machinery
Furniture, equipment and vehicles
Buildings and improvements
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (a)
Related to:
Productive assets
Administrative assets
Depreciation total (a)

2023
95,369
12,896
1,304
503
110,072

108,265
1,807
110,072

2022
76,720
12,244
1,344
672
90,980

88,964
2,016
90,980

2021
66,011
12,468
1,960
700
81,139

78,479
2,660
81,139

(a) Depreciation without considering capitalized costs for oil stock included in Inventories nor depreciation of right-of-use

assets.

Note 11     Staff costs and Directors’ Remuneration

Number of employees at year end (a)
Amounts in US$ ‘000
Wages and salaries
Share-based payments (Note 31)
Social security charges
Director’s fees and allowance

Recognized as follows:
Production and operating costs
Geological and geophysical expenses
Administrative expenses
Selling expenses

Board of Directors’ and key managers’ remuneration
Salaries and fees
Share-based payments
Other benefits in kind

(a) Unaudited.

F-35

2023

470

41,917
7,328
5,992
896
56,133

14,639
8,407
32,604
483
56,133

6,081
4,886
—
10,967

2022

482

38,699
11,038
5,593
1,172
56,502

14,069
7,490
34,533
410
56,502

10,317
8,728
171
19,216

2021

463

42,516
6,621
6,901
2,853
58,891

16,994
6,219
35,360
318
58,891

9,069
5,759
296
15,124

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Directors’ Remuneration

James F. Park (a)
Andrés Ocampo (b)
Robert Bedingfield (c)
Constantin Papadimitriou (d)
Somit Varma (e)
Sylvia Escovar Gomez (f)
Brian Maxted (g)
Carlos Macellari (h)
Marcela Vaca (i)

    Non-Executive     Director Fees     Cash Equivalent

Directors’ Fees Paid in Shares Total Remuneration

(in US$)

—
—
—
120,000
—
—
120,000
205,000
100,000

(No. of Shares)
—
—
21,098
8,791
20,219
23,109
8,791
8,791
8,791

(in US$)

—
—
240,000
220,000
230,000
262,500
220,000
305,000
200,000

(a) Mr.  Park  has  a  consulting  agreement  with  the  Company  to  act  as  CEO  advisor  and  provide  support  and  assistance  in
addition to his role as Vicechair, non-executive Director and Strategy and Risk Committee Chairman, and he relinquished
his fees as a member of the Board.

(b) Mr.  Ocampo  has  a  service  contract  to  act  as  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  he  relinquished  his  fees  as  a  member  of  the

Board.

(c) Audit Committee Chairman.
(d) Compensation Committee Chairman.
(e) Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman.
(f)
Independent Chair of the Board.
(g) Technical Committee Chairman.
(h) Mr. Macellari, as member of the Technical Committee, instructed by the Board, was awarded additional fees on strategic

and technical exploration advisory.

(i) SPEED Committee Chairman.

Note 12     Geological and geophysical expenses

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Staff costs (Note 11)
Share-based payment (Note 11)
Communication and IT costs
Consultant fees
Allocation to capitalized project
Other services

Note 13     Administrative expenses

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Staff costs (Note 11)
Share-based payment (Note 11)
Consultant fees
Safety and insurance costs
Travel expenses
Non-operated blocks expenses
Director’s fees and allowance (Note 11)
Communication and IT costs
Allocation to joint operations
Other administrative expenses

F-36

2023
7,879
528
2,139
1,373
(1,254)
527
11,192

2023
25,675
6,033
10,645
3,890
1,730
1,568
896
3,760
(13,986)
3,758
43,969

2022
7,097
393
1,743
917
(416)
795
10,529

2022
23,671
9,690
9,574
3,834
2,336
1,390
1,172
3,419
(9,642)
4,580
50,024

2021
6,042
177
1,071
854
(953)
700
7,891

2021
26,402
6,105
10,806
3,142
719
799
2,853
4,214
(8,574)
362
46,828

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Note 14     Selling expenses

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Staff costs (Note 11)
Shared-based payment (Note 11)
Transportation (a)
Selling taxes and other

2023

466
17
9,022
3,579
13,084

2022

2021

410
—
4,881
2,704
7,995

318
—
4,233
4,179
8,730

(a) The rise in transportation costs in 2023 is mainly attributed to deliveries at different sales points in the CPO-5 Block in
Colombia. Sales at the wellhead incur no selling costs but yield lower revenue, while transportation expenses for sales to
alternative delivery points are recognized as selling expenses.

Note 15     Financial results

Amounts in US$ '000
Financial expenses
Interest and amortization of debt issue costs
Borrowings cancellation costs
Bank charges and other financial results
Unwinding of long-term liabilities

Financial income
Interest received

Foreign exchange gains and losses
Foreign exchange (loss) gain, net
Realized result on currency risk management contracts

Total Financial results

Note 16     Tax reform in Colombia

2023

2022

2021

(30,839)
—
(8,520)
(6,456)
(45,815)

(36,360)
(5,141)
(9,546)
(6,026)
(57,073)

(44,713)
(6,308)
(8,012)
(5,079)
(64,112)

6,237
6,237

3,180
3,180

1,652
1,652

(19,729)
2,909
(16,820)
(56,398)

19,725
—
19,725
(34,168)

5,049
—
5,049
(57,411)

In  November  2022,  the  Colombian  Congress  approved  a Tax  Reform  (“Law  2277”)  which  contemplated  an  increase  in  the
effective tax rate and the government take for certain entities of the oil and gas industry.

A relevant provision included in the Law 2277 establishes a permanent surtax for companies developing crude oil extractive
activities,  ranging  between  0%  and  15%.  The  surtax  triggers  when  the  Brent  price  average  during  the  fiscal  year  meets
percentiles 30 and upwards of the Brent price average of the last 10 years (as shown in the table below regarding fiscal year
2024) and is calculated as additional percentage points of the CIT rate that is applicable to the taxable base determined on a
regular basis for CIT purposes. The applicable surtax for 2023 was 10%. Income derived from gas production is exempted of
surtax.

Surcharge Price Triggers applicable for fiscal year 2024
< US$ 67.18 /bbl
US$ 67.18 to US$ 76.39 /bbl
US$ 76.39 to US$ 79.87 /bbl
> US$ 79.87 /bbl

Surcharge rate
0%
5%
10%
15%

In  addition  to  the  aforementioned  rules,  the  Law  2277  included  other  measures  such  as  the  strike  off  of  the  straight-line
amortization method for new exploratory assets which will pass to be calculated under the ‘unit of production’ method, and
repeals the tax credit of 50% of the industry and commerce tax paid during the year, which will no longer be treated

F-37

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

as a tax credit but as a common deduction. The tax rate for dividends increased to 20% as well as the rate for capital gains tax
that increased to 15%.

These tax provisions became effective in 2023, but the surtax was considered for deferred income tax purposes from the year
ended December 31, 2022.

Note 17     Income tax

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Current income tax liabilities

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Current income tax charge
Deferred income tax benefit (charge) (Note 18)

2023
44,269
44,269

2023
(107,740)
4,299
(103,441)

2022
(126,269)
(44,205)
(170,474)

2022
65,002
65,002

2021
(49,291)
(17,980)
(67,271)

The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax
rate applicable to profits of the consolidated entities as follows:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Profit before tax
Tax losses from non-taxable jurisdictions
Taxable profit

Income tax calculated at domestic tax rates applicable to Profit in the respective
countries
Tax losses where no deferred income tax benefit is recognized
Effect of currency translation on tax base
Effect of inflation adjustment for tax purposes
Changes in the income tax rate (Note 16)
Write-down of deferred income tax benefits previously recognized (a)
Previously unrecognized tax losses
Income tax on dividends (b)
Fiscal recognition of property, plant and equipment
Non-taxable results (c)
Income tax

2023
214,509
39,526
254,035

2022
394,909
53,005
447,914

2021
128,398
91,351
219,749

(123,202)
(6,918)
36,691
—
(8,853)
(3,895)
632
(2,595)
—
4,699
(103,441)

(157,315)
(2,832)
(10,797)
—
(3,820)
(2,938)
9,067
(3,038)
—
1,199
(170,474)

(71,086)
(7,510)
(10,354)
2,482
(1,703)
(7,261)
9,593
—
8,919
9,649
(67,271)

(a)

(b)

(c)

Includes  write-down  of  tax  losses  and  other  deferred  income  tax  assets  in  Chile,  Brazil  and Argentina  where  there  is
insufficient  evidence  of  future  taxable  profits  to  offset  them,  in  accordance  with  the  expected  future  cash-flows  as  of
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Includes income tax payable in Spain due to dividends received from subsidiaries.

Includes non-deductible expenses and non-taxable gains in each jurisdiction.

Under  current  Bermuda  law,  the  Company  is  not  required  to  pay  any  taxes  in  Bermuda  on  income  or  capital  gains.  The
Company has received an undertaking from the Minister of Finance in Bermuda that, in the event of any taxes being imposed,
they will be exempt from taxation in Bermuda until March 2035. Income tax rate in Colombia may range from 35% to 50%,
depending  on  the  surcharge  applicable  for  each  year  (see  Note  16).  Income  tax  rates  in  other  countries  where  the  Group
operates (Ecuador, Brazil and Chile) ranges from 15% to 34%. There are no income tax consequences attached to the payment
of dividends by the Group to its shareholders.

F-38

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

The Group has tax losses available which can be utilized against future taxable profit in the following countries:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Colombia
Brazil (a)
Chile (a) (c)
Argentina (b)
Spain (a)
Total tax losses as of December 31

2023

—
26,808
313,409
9,981
6,936
357,134

2022
4,837
26,736
323,929
24,065
7,205
386,772

2021
15,557
26,781
285,456
35,773
9,443
373,010

(a) Taxable losses have no expiration date.
(b) Tax losses accumulated as of December 31, 2023, are: US$ 2,551,000, US$ 939,000, US$ 2,297,000, US$ 927,000 and

US$ 3,267,000 expiring in 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028, respectively.

(c) The Chilean business was divested on January 18, 2024 (see Note 36.1), and therefore these tax losses no longer belong

to GeoPark from such date.

As of December 31, 2023, deferred income tax assets in respect of tax losses in Chile and Argentina and a portion of tax losses
in Brazil have not been recognized as there is insufficient evidence of future taxable profits to offset them.

Note 18     Deferred income tax

The gross movement on the deferred income tax account is as follows:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Deferred income tax as of January 1
Currency translation differences
Income tax expense relating to cash flow hedges recognized in OCI
Income statement benefit (charge)
Deferred income tax as of December 31

2023
(51,180)
107
(1,369)
4,299
(48,143)

2022
(6,875)
383
(483)
(44,205)
(51,180)

The  breakdown  and  movement  of  deferred  income  tax  assets  and  liabilities  as  of  December  31,  2023,  and  2022,  are  as
follows:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Deferred income tax assets
Difference in depreciation rates and other
Tax losses
Total 2023
Total 2022

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Deferred income tax liabilities
Difference in depreciation rates and other
Total 2023
Total 2022

    At the

beginning Charged to
net profit

of year

    Currency    
translation
differences Reclassification

At the end
of year

4,759
14,184
18,943
14,072

8,911
(11,485)
(2,574)
4,488

(108)
215
107
383

(556)
—
(556)

13,006
2,914
15,920
— 18,943

At the beginning
of year

Charged to
net profit

    Income tax expense    
relating to
cash flow hedges

Reclassification

At the end
of year

(70,123)
(70,123)
(20,947)

6,873
6,873
(48,693)

(1,369)
(1,369)
(483)

556
556
—

(64,063)
(64,063)
(70,123)

F-39

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Note 19     Earnings per share

Amounts in US$ ‘000 except for shares
Numerator: Profit for the year
Denominator: Weighted average number of shares used in basic EPS
Earnings after tax per share (US$) – basic

2023
111,068
56,836,682
1.95

2022
224,435
59,330,421
3.78

2021
61,127
60,901,109
1.00

Amounts in US$ ‘000 except for shares
Weighted average number of shares used in basic EPS
Effect of dilutive potential common shares
Stock awards at US$ 0.001
Weighted average number of common shares for the purposes of diluted earnings
per shares
Earnings after tax per share (US$) – diluted

2023
56,836,682

2022
59,330,421

2021
60,901,109

359,587

552,466

559,012

57,196,269
1.94

59,882,887
3.75

61,460,121
0.99

Note 20     Property, plant and equipment

Amounts in US$’000
Cost as of January 1, 2021
Additions / ARO change
Currency translation differences
Disposals
Write-off / Impairment
Transfers
Assets held for sale (Note 36.3)
Cost as of December 31, 2021
Additions / ARO change
Currency translation differences
Disposals
Write-off / Impairment
Transfers
Cost as of December 31, 2022
Additions / ARO change
Currency translation differences
Disposals
Write-off / Impairment
Transfers
Assets held for sale (Note 36.1)
Cost as of December 31, 2023

    Furniture,     Production     Buildings

Oil & gas
properties
968,617

(1,094)(b)
(3,284)
—
(1,575)(c)
68,315
(73,047)
957,932

(7,558)(b)
2,921
—
—
125,962
1,079,257

9,744 (b)
3,477
—
(13,332)(c)
171,538
(330,024)
920,660

facilities and
equipment
and vehicles machinery
197,829
—
(246)
(900)
(2,759)(c)
13,305
(6,052)
201,177
6
232
(26)
—
21,338
222,727
12
277
—
—
21,262
(74,491)
169,787

20,707
930
(43)
(1,762)
—
58
(1,178)
18,712
1,620
37
(1,290)
—
14
19,093
1,683
46
(1,223)
—
93
(6,559)
13,133

and
improvements
12,442
—
(16)
(978)
—
391
(177)
11,662
(14)
6
(774)
—
147
11,027
17
8
(2,150)
—
93
(4,948)
4,047

Depreciation and write-down as of January 1, 2021
Depreciation
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Assets held for sale (Note 36.3)
Depreciation and write-down as of December 31, 2021
Depreciation
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Depreciation and write-down as of December 31, 2022
Depreciation
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Assets held for sale (Note 36.1)
Depreciation and write-down as of December 31, 2023

Carrying amount as of December 31, 2021
Carrying amount as of December 31, 2022
Carrying amount as of December 31, 2023

(548,445)
(66,011)
—
2,219
49,080
(563,157)
(76,720)
—
(2,403)
(642,280)
(95,369)
—
(3,179)
310,683
(430,145)

394,775
436,977
490,515

(109,987)
(12,468)
900
246
4,692
(116,617)
(12,244)
19
(231)
(129,073)
(12,896)
—
(277)
68,765
(73,481)

84,560
93,654
96,306

(6,975)
(700)
838
16
153
(6,668)
(672)
752
(6)
(6,594)
(503)
1,877
(8)
2,158
(3,070)

4,994
4,433
977

(16,985)
(1,960)
1,325
37
915
(16,668)
(1,344)
1,246
(33)
(16,799)
(1,304)
1,189
(41)
6,488
(10,467)

2,044
2,294
2,666

F-40

Construction in
progress

    Exploration    
and evaluation
assets(a)

18,848
82,094
(18)
(3,372)

— (c)

(70,321)
(27)
27,204
107,171
18
—
—
(117,913)
16,480
116,304
21
(119)
—
(116,905)
—
15,781

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

78,614
46,234
(30)
(338)
(12,262)(d)
(11,748)
—
100,470
67,889
19
—
(25,789)(e)
(29,548)
113,041
73,160
22
—

(29,563)(f)
(76,081)
—
80,579

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

27,204
16,480
15,781

100,470
113,041
80,579

Total
1,297,057
128,164
(3,637)
(7,350)
(16,596)
—
(80,481)
1,317,157
169,114
3,233
(2,090)
(25,789)
—
1,461,625
200,920
3,851
(3,492)
(42,895)
—
(416,022)
1,203,987

(682,392)
(81,139)
3,063
2,518
54,840
(703,110)
(90,980)
2,017
(2,673)
(794,746)
(110,072)
3,066
(3,505)
388,094
(517,163)

614,047
666,879
686,824

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

(a) Exploration  wells  movement  and  balances  are  shown  in  the  table  below;  mining  property  associated  with  unproved
reserves  and  resources,  seismic  and  other  exploratory  assets  amount  to  US$  72,581,000  (US$  96,041,000  in  2022  and
US$ 90,166,000 in 2021).

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Exploration wells as of December 31, 2021
Additions
Write-offs
Transfers
Exploration wells as of December 31, 2022
Additions
Write-offs
Transfers
Exploration wells as of December 31, 2023

Total
10,304
56,491
(21,460)
(28,335)
17,000
61,500
(24,815)
(45,687)
7,998

As of December 31, 2023, there were two exploratory wells that have been capitalized for a period less than three years
amounting to US$ 7,998,000.

(b) Corresponds to the effect of change in estimate of assets retirement obligations.

(c) See Note 37.

(d) Corresponds  to  two  unsuccessful  exploratory  wells  drilled  in  the  Llanos  32  Block  (Colombia),  other  exploration  costs
incurred in the Fell Block (Chile), an exploratory well drilled in previous years in the CPO-5 Block (Colombia) and other
exploration costs incurred in previous years in the PUT-30 Block (Colombia).

(e) Corresponds  to  exploration  costs  incurred  in  previous  years  in  the  Tacacho  and  Terecay  Blocks  (Colombia),  four
exploratory wells drilled in the CPO-5, Platanillo, Llanos 34 and Llanos 94 Blocks (Colombia), and certain exploration
costs incurred in the Espejo Block (Ecuador).

(f) Corresponds  to  three  unsuccessful  exploratory  wells  drilled  in  the  Llanos  87  Block  (Colombia),  an  unsuccessful
exploratory well drilled in the Llanos 124 Block (Colombia) and other exploration costs incurred in the Llanos 94, Coati
and Llanos 124 Blocks (Colombia).

F-41

   
Table of Contents

Note 21     Subsidiary undertakings

The following chart illustrates main companies of the Group structure as of December 31, 2023:

(1) GeoPark Ecuador S.A. holds 50% working interest in the consortiums that operate the Espejo and Perico Blocks.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the following change to the Group structure has taken place:

● The merger process between GeoPark Colombia S.A.S., GeoPark Colombia E&P S.A. and Petrodorado South America
S.A., with GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. being the surviving company, became effective as of its registration in the Public
Registry of the Chamber of Commerce of Bogota on January 27, 2023.

● As  a  result  of  the  abovementioned  merger  and  to  comply  with  local  regulatory  obligations,  GeoPark  Colombia  S.A.S.

incorporated a branch in Panama, which is currently dormant.

F-42

Table of Contents

Details of all the subsidiaries of the Group as of December 31, 2023, are set out below:

Name and registered office

Ownership interest

Subsidiaries

GeoPark Argentina S.A. (Argentina)
GeoPark Brasil Exploração e Produção de Petróleo e Gás Ltda. (Brazil)
GeoPark Chile S.p.A. (Chile)
GeoPark Fell S.p.A. (Chile)
GeoPark Magallanes Limitada (Chile)
GeoPark TdF S.p.A. (Chile)
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. (Colombia)
GeoPark Colombia, S.L.U. (Spain)
GeoPark Perú S.A.C. (Peru)
GeoPark Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Mexico)
GeoPark E&P S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Mexico)
GeoPark Ecuador S.A. (Ecuador)
GeoPark (UK) Limited (United Kingdom)
Amerisur Resources Limited (United Kingdom)
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limited (British Virgin Islands)
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limited Sucursal Colombia (Colombia)
Yarumal S.A.S. (Colombia)
Fenix Oil & Gas Limited (British Virgin Islands)
Fenix Oil & Gas Limited Sucursal Colombia (Colombia)
Amerisurexplor Ecuador S.A. (Ecuador)
Amerisur S.A. (Paraguay)
Market Access LLP (United States)
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. Sucursal Panama (Panama)

100% (a)
100% (a)
100% (a) (c)
100% (a) (c)
100% (a) (c)
100% (a) (c)
100% (a)
100% (a)
100% (a)
100% (a) (b)
100% (a) (b)
100% (a)
100%
100% (a)
100% (a)
100% (a)
100% (a) (b)
100% (a) (b)
100% (a) (b)
100% (a) (b)
100% (a) (b)
9%
100% (a) (b)

(a)
Indirectly owned.
(b) Dormant companies.
(c) Divested in January 2024. See Note 36.1.

F-43

   
   
Table of Contents

Details of the joint operations of the Group as of December 31, 2023, are set out below:

Name and registered office

Ownership interest

Joint operations

Flamenco Block (Chile)
Campanario Block (Chile)
Isla Norte Block (Chile)
Llanos 34 Block (Colombia)
Llanos 32 Block (Colombia)
Puelen Block (Argentina)
Los Parlamentos (Argentina)
Manati Field (Brazil)
POT-T-785 Block (Brazil)
Espejo Block (Ecuador)
Perico Block (Ecuador)
Llanos 86 Block (Colombia)
Llanos 87 Block (Colombia)
Llanos 104 Block (Colombia)
Llanos 123 Block (Colombia)
Llanos 124 Block (Colombia)
CPO-5 Block (Colombia)
Mecaya Block (Colombia)
PUT-8 Block (Colombia)
PUT-9 Block (Colombia)
Tacacho Block (Colombia)
Terecay Block (Colombia)
Llanos 94 Block (Colombia)
PUT-36 Block (Colombia)
CPO-4-1 Block (Colombia)

In process of relinquishment.

(a) GeoPark is the operator.
(b)
(c) Divested in January 2024. See Note 36.1.
(d) GeoPark agreed to transfer its 50% working interest to its joint operation partner.

Note 22     Prepayments and other receivables

Amounts in US$ '000
V.A.T.
Income tax payments in advance
Other prepaid taxes
To be recovered from co-venturers (Note 34)
Prepayments and other receivables

Classified as follows:
Current
Non-current

F-44

50% (a) (c)
50% (a) (c)
60% (a) (c)
45% (a)
12.5%
18% (b)
50% (d)
10%
70% (a)
50% (a)
50%
50% (a)
50% (a)
50% (a)
50% (a)
50% (a)
30%
50% (a)
50% (a)
50% (a)
50% (a) (b)
50% (a) (b)
50% (d)
50% (a)
50%

2023
4,310
3,685
23
8,630
12,311
28,959

25,896
3,063
28,959

2022
1,826
3,156
37
8,750
8,458
22,227

22,106
121
22,227

   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Movements on the Group provision for impairment are as follows:

Amounts in US$ '000
At January 1
Additions
Foreign exchange gain (loss)

Note 23     Inventories

Amounts in US$ '000
Crude oil
Materials and spares

The carrying amount of inventories is not pledged as security for liabilities.

Note 24     Trade receivables

Amounts in US$ '000
Trade receivables

2023

2022

14
—
4
18

7
10
(3)
14

2023
9,441
4,111
13,552

2022
12,630
1,804
14,434

2023
65,049
65,049

2022
71,794
71,794

As of December 31, 2023, and 2022, there are no balances that were aged by more than 3 months. Trade receivables that are
aged by less than three months are not considered impaired.

The credit period for trade receivables is 30 days. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying
value of each class of receivable. The Group does not hold any collateral as security related to trade receivables.

The  carrying  value  of  trade  receivables  is  considered  to  represent  a  reasonable  approximation  of  its  fair  value  due  to  their
short-term nature.

Note 25     Financial instruments by category

Amounts in US$ '000
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Derivative financial instrument assets
Cash and cash equivalents

Other financial assets at amortized cost
Trade receivables
To be recovered from co-venturers (Note 34)
Other financial assets (a)
Cash and cash equivalents

Total financial assets

Assets as per statement
of financial position
2022
2023

3,775
—
3,775

65,049
8,630
12,564
133,036
219,279
223,054

967
242
1,209

71,794
8,750
12,877
128,601
222,022
223,231

(a) Non-current other financial assets relate to restricted deposits made for environmental obligations according to Brazilian
government regulations. Current other financial assets correspond to short-term investments with original maturities up to
twelve months and over three months.

F-45

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss
Derivative financial instrument liabilities

Other financial liabilities at amortized cost
Trade payables
To be paid to co-venturers (Note 34)
Lease liabilities
Borrowings

Total financial liabilities

25.1 Credit quality of financial assets

Liabilities as per statement
of financial position
2022
2023

70
70

19
19

108,977
522
32,298
500,981
642,778
642,848

102,125
2,815
32,051
497,642
634,633
634,652

The  credit  quality  of  financial  assets  that  are  neither  past  due  nor  impaired  can  be  assessed  by  reference  to  external  credit
ratings (if available) or to historical information about counterparty default rates:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Trade receivables
Counterparties with an external credit rating (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch)
Aa3
A3
Baa1
Baa3
Ba1
Ba2
Ba3
B2
Counterparties without an external credit rating
Group 1 (a)
Total trade receivables

2023

2022

—
949
1,721
151
15,068
2,953
—
63

44,144
65,049

2,013
1,557
99
198
23,755
—
2,745
4,085

37,342
71,794

(a) Group 1 – no existing balances with customers aged by more than 3 months.

All trade receivables are denominated in US Dollars, except in Brazil where they are denominated in Brazilian Real.

F-46

   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Cash at bank and other financial assets (a)

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Counterparties with an external credit rating (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch, BRC
Investor Services)
Aa3
A1
A2
A3
Baa1
Baa2
Baa3
Ba1
Ba2
Ba3
B3
Counterparties without an external credit rating
Total

2023

2022

—
91,747
268
16,147
18
17,585
125
—
6,528
5
593
12,571
145,587

10,362
96,077
57
10,389
39
7,030
1,352
64
268
3,066
51
12,953
141,708

(a) The  remaining  balance  sheet  item  ‘cash  and  cash  equivalents’  corresponds  to  cash  on  hand  amounting  to  US$  13,000

(US$ 12,000 in 2022).

25.2 Financial liabilities- contractual undiscounted cash flows

The table below analyses the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the
balance sheet to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.

Amounts in US$ ‘000
As of December 31, 2023
Borrowings
Lease liabilities
Trade payables
To be paid to co-venturers (Note 34)

As of December 31, 2022
Borrowings
Lease liabilities
Trade payables
To be paid to co-venturers (Note 34)

    Less than 1     Between 1     Between 2     Over 5
years

and 5 years

and 2 years

year

27,500
9,416
108,977
522
146,415

27,500
10,939
102,125
2,815
143,379

27,500
6,515
—
—
34,015

27,500
5,653
—
—
33,153

541,250
11,719
—
—
552,969

568,750
11,209
—
—
579,959

—
25,134
—
—
25,134

—
25,012
—
—
25,012

25.3 Fair value measurement of financial instruments

Accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to classify as either: amortized cost, financial assets at fair
value through profit or loss and fair value through other comprehensive income. For financial instruments that are measured in
the statement of financial position at fair value, IFRS 13 requires a disclosure of fair value measurements by level according to
the following fair value measurement hierarchy:

Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices).

Level 3 - Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs).

F-47

   
   
Table of Contents

25.3.1 Fair value hierarchy

The following table presents the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured and recognized at fair value as of
December 31, 2023, and 2022, on a recurring basis:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Assets
Derivative financial instrument assets
Commodity risk management contracts
Total Assets

Liabilities
Derivative financial instrument liabilities
Commodity risk management contracts
Total Liabilities

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market funds
Derivative financial instrument assets
Commodity risk management contracts
Total Assets
Liabilities
Derivative financial instrument liabilities
Commodity risk management contracts
Total Liabilities

Level 1

Level 2

2023

    As of December 31,

—
—

—
—

3,775
3,775

70
70

3,775
3,775

70
70

Level 1

Level 2

As of December 31,
2022

242

—
242

—
—

—

967
967

19
19

242

967
1,209

19
19

There were no transfers between Level 2 and 3 during the period.

The  Group  did  not  measure  any  financial  assets  or  financial  liabilities  at  fair  value  on  a  non-recurring  basis  as  of
December 31, 2023.

25.3.2 Valuation techniques used to determine fair values

Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:

● The use of quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments.
● The mark-to-market fair value of the Group’s outstanding derivative instruments is based on independently provided
market rates and determined using standard valuation techniques, including the impact of counterparty credit risk and
are within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

● The fair value of the remaining financial instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis. All of the

resulting fair value estimates are included in level 2.

25.3.3 Fair values of other financial instruments (unrecognized)

The  Group  also  has  a  number  of  financial  instruments  which  are  not  measured  at  fair  value  in  the  balance  sheet.  For  the
majority  of  these  instruments,  the  fair  values  are  not  materially  different  to  their  carrying  amounts,  since  the  interest
receivable/payable is either close to current market rates or the instruments are short-term in nature.

Borrowings  are  comprised  primarily  of  fixed  rate  debt  and  variable  rate  debt  with  a  short-term  portion  where  interest  has
already been fixed. They are classified under other financial liabilities and measured at their amortized cost.

The  fair  value  of  these  financial  instruments  as  of  December  31,  2023,  amounts  to  US$  443,690,000  (US$  431,660,000  in
2022). The fair values are based on market price for the Notes and cash flows discounted for other borrowings using a rate
based on the borrowing rate and are within level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, respectively.

F-48

   
   
Table of Contents

Note 26     Equity

26.1 Share capital and Share premium

Issued share capital
Common stock (amounts in US$ ‘000)
The share capital is distributed as follows:
Common shares, of nominal US$ 0.001
Total common shares in issue

Authorized share capital

US$ per share

Number of common shares (US$ 0.001 each)
Amount in US$

2023

2022

55

58

55,327,520
55,327,520

57,621,998
57,621,998

0.001

0.001

5,171,949,000
5,171,949

5,171,949,000
5,171,949

Details regarding the share capital of the Company are set out below.

26.1.1 Common shares

As of December 31, 2023, the outstanding common shares confer the following rights on the holder:

● the right to one vote per share
● ranking pari passu, the right to any dividend declared and payable on common shares

GeoPark common shares history
Shares outstanding at the end of 2021
Buyback program
Buyback program
Stock awards
Buyback program
Buyback program
Shares outstanding at the end of 2022
Stock awards
Buyback program
Stock awards
Buyback program
Buyback program
Buyback program
Shares outstanding at the end of 2023

Month

Mar 2022
Jun 2022
Jul 2022
Sep 2022
Dec 2022

Feb 2023
Mar 2023
May 2023
Jun 2023
Sep 2023
Dec 2023

Shares
movement
(millions)

(0.2)
(0.5)
0.1
(1.1)
(0.9)

0.6
(0.6)
0.1
(1.1)
(0.5)
(0.8)

Shares
closing
(millions)
60.2
60.0
59.5
59.6
58.5
57.6
57.6
58.2
57.6
57.7
56.6
56.1
55.3
55.3

US$(`000)
Closing
60
60
60
60
59
58
58
58
58
58
57
56
55
55

26.1.2 Stock Award Program and Other Share Based Payments

Non-Executive Directors Fees

During  2023,  the  Company  issued  99,590  shares  (75,636  in  2022  and  64,269  in  2021)  to  Non-Executive  Directors  in
accordance with contracts as compensation, generating a share premium of US$ 1,133,000 (US$ 1,040,000 in 2022 and US$
861,000 in 2021). The number of shares issued is determined considering the contractual compensation and the fair value of
the shares for each relevant period.

F-49

   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Stock Award Program and Other Share Based Payments

On  February  3,  2023,  350,938  common  shares  were  issued  as  part  of  the  compensation  agreements  related  to  the  CEO
transition which occurred in 2022, generating a share premium of US$ 4,799,000. On July 15, 2022, 52,058 common shares
were  issued  as  part  of  the  founding  executive  employment  agreement  in  place  with  the  former  Chief  Executive  Officer
(104,439 in 2021), generating a share premium of US$ 800,000 (US$ 800,000 in 2021).

On  February  3,  2023,  246,110  common  shares  were  issued  as  a  result  of  the  vesting  of  the  first  tranche  of  the  Long-Term
Incentive  program  (“LTIP”)  oriented  to  executive  officers  which  was  granted  in  2022,  generating  a  share  premium  of  US$
1,505,000.

During 2023, 82,472 common shares were issued as part of other equity incentive plans vested during the year, generating a
share premium of US$ 281,000.

26.1.3 Buyback Program

The Company has recurring buyback programs to repurchase its own shares. The latest renewal took place on November 8,
2023, and established a program to repurchase up to 10% of the shares outstanding, or approximately 5,611,797 shares, until
December 31, 2024.

In addition to any repurchases under the aforementioned repurchase program, the Company has authority from its Board of
Directors to repurchase, on a standalone basis, up to US$ 50,000,000 of its common shares in 2024.

During 2023, the Company purchased 3,073,588 common shares (2,743,722 in 2022 and 960,454 in 2021) for a total amount
of US$ 31,239,000 (US$ 36,265,000 in 2022 and US$ 11,841,000 in 2021). These transactions had no impact on the Group’s
results.

26.2 Cash distributions

On November 6, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the initiation of quarterly cash distributions.

The following table summarizes the cash distributions for each of the years presented:

Date of distribution
April 13, 2021
May 28, 2021
August 31, 2021
December 7, 2021

Date of declaration
March 10, 2021
May 5, 2021
August 4, 2021
November 10, 2021
Cash distributions for the year ended December 31, 2021
March 31, 2022
March 9, 2022
June 10, 2022
May 11, 2022
September 8, 2022
August 10, 2022
November 9, 2022
December 7, 2022
Cash distributions for the year ended December 31, 2022
March 31, 2023
March 8, 2023
May 31, 2023
May 3, 2023
September 7, 2023
August 9, 2023
November 8, 2023
December 11, 2023
Cash distributions for the year ended December 31, 2023

These distributions are deducted from Other Reserves.

F-50

US$ per share

Total amount
in US$ ‘000

0.0205
0.0205
0.0410
0.0410

0.0820
0.0820
0.1270
0.1270

0.1300
0.1300
0.1320
0.1340

1,133
1,220
2,442
2,429
7,224
4,847
4,809
7,345
7,281
24,282
7,505
7,378
7,383
7,449
29,715

   
   
   
Table of Contents

Note 27     Borrowings

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Outstanding amounts as of December 31
Notes due 2027

Classified as follows:
Current
Non-current

2023

2022

500,981
500,981

12,528
488,453

497,642
497,642

12,528
485,114

On January 17, 2020, the Company placed US$ 350,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.500% senior secured notes due
2027 (the “Notes due 2027”), which were offered in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with
Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and outside the United States to non U.S. persons in accordance with Regulation S under
the Securities Act. The Notes due 2027 were priced at 99.285% and carry a coupon of 5.50% per annum (yield 5.625% per
annum). Final maturity will be January 17, 2027.

In  April  2021,  the  Company  reopened  its  Notes  due  2027,  issuing  an  additional  US$  150,000,000  principal  amount.  The
reopening was priced above par at 101.875%, representing a yield to maturity of 5.117%. The Notes due 2027 were offered in
a private placement to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and outside the
United States to non-U.S. persons in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes due 2027 are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by GeoPark Colombia, S.L.U.

From  April  2021  to  September  2022,  the  Company  repurchased  and  cancelled  its  US$  425,000,000  aggregate  principal
amount of 6.500% senior secured notes due 2024 (the “Notes due 2024”). In April 2021, the Company executed a tender to
purchase  US$  255,000,000  of  the  Notes  due  2024,  funded  with  a  combination  of  cash  in  hand  and  the  abovementioned
reopening  of  the  Notes  due  2027.  From  March  to  September  2022,  the  Company  repurchased  and  cancelled  the  remaining
amount of the Notes due 2024 for a nominal amount of US$ 170,000,000. The difference between the carrying amount of debt
that was repurchased or redeemed and the consideration paid was recognized within ‘Financial expenses’ in the Consolidated
Statement of Income.

The indenture governing the Notes due 2027 includes incurrence test covenants that provide, among other things, that the Net
Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio should not exceed 3.25 times and the Adjusted EBITDA to Interest ratio should exceed 2.5
times. Failure to comply with the incurrence test covenants does not trigger an event of default. However, this situation may
limit the Company’s capacity to incur additional indebtedness, as specified in the indentures governing the Notes. Incurrence
covenants,  as  opposed  to  maintenance  covenants,  must  be  tested  by  the  Company  before  incurring  additional  debt  or
performing certain corporate actions including but not limited to dividend payments, restricted payments and others. As of the
date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company complies with all the indentures’ provisions and covenants.

On August 3, 2023, GeoPark Colombia S.A.S., as borrower, and GeoPark Limited, as guarantor, signed a senior unsecured
credit  agreement  with  Banco  BTG  Pactual  S.A.  and  Banco  Latinoamericano  de  Comercio  Exterior  S.A.  which  provides
GeoPark  with  access  to  up  to  US$  80,000,000,  with  an  availability  period  until  November  3,  2024,  and  final  maturity  on
August 3, 2025. The agreement establishes a commitment fee of 1.85% per annum with respect to undrawn amounts and an
interest  rate  of  SOFR  +  3.70%  with  respect  to  amounts  drawn.  “SOFR”  (Secured  Overnight  Financing  Rate)  is  a  broad
measure  of  the  cost  of  borrowing  cash  overnight  collateralized  by  treasury  securities. As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated
Financial Statements, GeoPark has not withdrawn any amount under this credit facility.

As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated  Financial  Statements,  the  Group  has  access  to  the  abovementioned  US$  80,000,000
senior unsecured committed credit facility and to US$ 179,600,000 in uncommitted credit lines.

F-51

   
   
Table of Contents

Note 28     Leases

The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position shows the following amounts relating to leases:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Right of use assets
Production, facilities and machinery
Buildings and improvements

Lease liabilities
Current
Non-current

The Consolidated Statement of Income shows the following amounts relating to leases:

Amounts in US$ ‘000
Depreciation charge of Right of use assets
Production, facilities and machinery
Buildings and improvements

Unwinding of long-term liabilities (included in Financial results)
Expenses related to short-term leases (included in Production and operating cost and
Administrative expenses)
Expenses related to low-value leases (included in Administrative expenses)

2023

2022

24,201
4,250
28,451

8,911
23,387
32,298

32,034
4,977
37,011

10,000
22,051
32,051

2023

2022

2021

(7,858)
(792)
(8,650)
(3,168)

(838)
(775)

(6,057)
(988)
(7,045)
(2,838)

(2,614)
(708)

(5,526)
(1,136)
(6,662)
(1,453)

(1,101)
(906)

The table below summarizes the amounts of Right-of-use assets recognized and the movements during the reporting years:

Amounts in US$‘000
Right-of-use assets as of January 1
Additions / changes in estimates
Foreign currency translation
Assets held for sale (Note 36.1)
Depreciation
Right-of-use assets as of December 31

2023
37,011
137
444
(491)
(8,650)
28,451

2022
21,014
22,462
580
—
(7,045)
37,011

The table below summarizes the amounts of Lease liabilities recognized and the movements during the reporting years:

Amounts in US$‘000
Lease liabilities as of January 1
Additions / changes in estimates
Exchange difference
Foreign currency translation
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale (Note 36.1)
Unwinding of discount
Lease payments
Lease liabilities as of December 31

F-52

2023
32,051
137
7,061
174
(26)
3,168
(10,267)
32,298

2022
20,744
22,462
(6,426)
284
—
2,838
(7,851)
32,051

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Note 29     Provisions and other long-term liabilities

Amounts in US$ ‘000
As of January 1, 2022
Addition to provision / changes in estimates
Exchange difference
Foreign currency translation
Amortization
Unwinding of discount
Amounts used during the year
As of December 31, 2022
Addition to provision / changes in estimates
Exchange difference
Foreign currency translation
Amortization
Unwinding of discount
Amounts used during the year
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale (Note 36.1)
As of December 31, 2023

    Asset retirement    
obligation (a)

Deferred
Income (b)

Other (c)

Total

45,842
(4,942)
(669)
(577)
—
2,641
(1,392)
40,903
7,374
1,172
717
—
2,794
(2,502)
(26,922)
23,536

3,331
—
(167)
—
(2,407)
—
—
757
—
180
—
(127)
—
—
—
810

13,675
(2,670)
(1,147)
14
—
547
(132)
10,287
2,460
560
(13)
—
494
(4,051)
—
9,737

62,848
(7,612)
(1,983)
(563)
(2,407)
3,188
(1,524)
51,947
9,834
1,912
704
(127)
3,288
(6,553)
(26,922)
34,083

(a) The  provision  for  ‘asset  retirement  obligation’  relates  to  the  estimation  of  future  disbursements  related  to  the

abandonment and decommissioning of oil and gas wells (see Note 4).

(b) ‘Deferred  income’  relates  to  government  grants  and  other  contributions  relating  to  the  purchase  of  property,  plant  and

equipment in Colombia. The amortization is in line with the related assets.

(c)

‘Other’ mainly includes environmental obligations in Colombia and Peru.

Legal proceeding in the United Kingdom

On January 8, 2020, Amerisur Resources Limited (“Amerisur”) received a copy of a claim form issued in the High Court of
England and Wales (the “Court”) by Leigh Day solicitors on behalf of a group of claimants (the “Claimants”) described as
members of a farming community in the department of Putumayo in Colombia, seeking compensation for economic and non-
economic damages said to be caused by alleged environmental contamination and pollution caused by Amerisur’s operations
in  the  region.  Following  initial  court  hearings,  an  interim  freezing  order  was  imposed  on Amerisur  for  an  amount  of  GBP
4,465,600  of  its  assets  located  in  the  United  Kingdom.  On  November  10,  2020,  the  freezing  order  was  discharged  by
agreement between the parties as Amerisur provided alternative security in the form of a letter of credit.

On February 6, 2023, the Court ordered Amerisur to pay the sum of GBP 330,022 (equivalent to US$ 409,000). On August 11,
2023, a settlement (the “Settlement”) was signed between Leigh Day and Amerisur, made on a no-admission of liability basis
and included a payment made by Amerisur. All Claimants represented by Leigh Day agreed to the Settlement. On October 2,
2023, the Court approved the Settlement, the litigation was discontinued, and the letter of credit was cancelled.

GeoPark  had  a  provision  for  this  contingent  liability,  which  was  originally  recognized  at  the  moment  of  the  acquisition  of
Amerisur in 2020. All payments made by Amerisur during 2023 were applied to the previously recognized contingent liability,
thus generating a gain of US$ 2,568,000 that was recorded in “Other income (expenses)” in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.

F-53

   
   
Table of Contents

Note 30     Trade and other payables

Amounts in US$ ‘000
V.A.T
Trade payables
Customer advance payments
Other short-term advance payments (a)
Outstanding commitments in Chile (b)
Staff costs to be paid
Royalties to be paid
Taxes and other debts to be paid
To be paid to co-venturers (Note 34)

Classified as follows:
Current
Non-current

2023

975
108,977
—
450
5,869
10,852
791
9,381
522
137,817

137,817
—

2022

8,513
102,125
481
—
—
9,306
9,403
8,963
2,815
141,606

141,606
—

(a) Advance payment collected in relation with the sale of the Group´s business in Chile (see Note 36.1).

(b)

Investment commitments in the Campanario and Isla Norte Blocks as a result of sale agreement of the Group´s business
in Chile (see Note 36.1).

The  average  credit  period  (expressed  as  creditor  days)  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  was  90  days  (2022:  69
days).

The fair value of these short-term financial instruments is not individually determined as the carrying amount is a reasonable
approximation of fair value.

Note 31     Share-based payment

The Group has established different stock awards programs and other share-based payment plans to incentivize the directors,
executive officers and employees, enabling them to benefit from the increased market capitalization of the Company.

During  2018,  GeoPark  announced  the  2018  Equity  Incentive  Plan  (the  “Plan”)  to  motivate  and  reward  those  employees,
directors, consultants and advisors of the Group to perform at the highest level and to further the best interests of the Company
and its shareholders. This Plan is designed as a master plan, with a 10-year term, and embraces all equity incentive programs
that the Company decides to implement throughout such term. The maximum number of shares available for issuance under
the Plan is 5,000,000 Shares.

In 2020, a share-based compensation program for employees was approved for approximately 800,000 shares, to vest in 2023.
On February 17, 2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Group’s results and the performance conditions established
in the program and approved 152,030 shares to be delivered to participants, due to the fact that, throughout the vesting period,
the performance conditions included in the program were only partially achieved and, to a lesser extent, the Group had lower
hirings than estimated and not all the beneficiaries continued being employees at the vesting date.

On March 8, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a pool of approximately 215,000 shares oriented for retention
of key employees and new hires bonuses, under the Stock Awards Program. Vesting of the plan is in a three-years period from
the grant date.

During 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a
Long-Term Incentive program (“LTIP”) for executive officers. Main characteristics of the program are:

● All executive officers are eligible.
● Grants are awarded annually to executive officers.

F-54

   
   
Table of Contents

● The components of the Program are the following:

-

-

-

20% Time-based Restricted Share Units (RSUs) vesting ratably in three equal installments on each of the first
three anniversaries of the grant date;
35%  Relative  Performance  Share  Units  based  on  relative  total  shareholder  return  (TSR)  and  measured  over
three-year performance period relative to peer group; and
45% Absolute Performance Share Units (PSUs) based on absolute total shareholder return (TSR) and measured
over three-year performance period.

In  February  2023,  246,110  common  shares  were  allotted  to  the  trustee  of  the  Employee  Beneficiary  Trust  (“EBT”)  as  a
consequence of the vesting of the first tranche of the abovementioned plan, and the Compensation Committee approved a new
grant effective as of February 14, 2023, of 197,197 shares to vest during a three-year period.

In  December  2022,  the  Company’s  Board  of  Directors,  based  on  the  recommendation  of  the  Compensation  Committee,
approved a Long-Term Incentive program for employees and new hirings. Main characteristics of the program are:

● All employees (non-top management) and new hirings are eligible.
● 3-year program, with a grant date of January 2, 2023, or the date on which the employees are hired.
● The components of the program are the following:

-
-

-

30% Time-based RSUs: vesting annually ratably in three equal installments;
30% Company Performance: measured over three-year performance period (December 2022-December 2025);
and
40% Absolute Performance Shares: share price at the date of vesting must be higher than the share price at the
date of grant or date of hiring.

● The vesting date of the Performance Shares (Company and Absolute) will be on January 2, 2026.

Details  of  these  costs  and  the  characteristics  of  the  different  stock  awards  programs  and  other  share-based  payments  are
described in the following table:

Year of issuance
2023
2022
2020
Subtotal
Shares granted to Non-Executive Directors
Shares granted to Executive Directors (a)
VCP (b)
LTIP for executives

    Awards at the     Awards granted     Awards     Awards     Awards at     Charged to net profit/loss
year end     2023     2022     2021

in the year

beginning

exercised

forfeited

No. of Shares

Amounts in US$ '000

—
191,400
405,919
597,319
—
375,937
—
571,984
1,545,240

795,412
12,000

807,412
99,590
—
—
268,129
1,175,131

(105,695)
—
(6,112)
(9,444)
(253,889)
(61,980)
(365,696)
(71,424)
(99,590)
—
— (359,271)
—
—
— (248,825)
(779,110)

(365,696)

689,717
187,844
90,050
967,611

1,452
990
—
2,442
— 1,133
126
—
3,627
7,328

16,666
—
591,288
1,575,565

—
619
1,691
2,310
1,041
3,560
2,016
2,111
11,038

—
—
862
862
861
800
4,098
—
6,621

(a)

(b)

Includes compensation agreements from CEO transition.
The  plan  named Value  Creation  Plan  (“VCP”),  oriented  to  key  management,  was  approved  in  2019. The  performance
metrics were not achieved to execute this program and is not currently in place.

The awards that are forfeited correspond to employees that had left the Group before vesting date.

Note 32     Interests in Joint operations

The  Group  has  interests  in  joint  operations,  which  are  engaged  in  the  exploration  of  hydrocarbons  in  Colombia,  Ecuador,
Brazil, Chile and Argentina.

GeoPark is the operator in the Llanos 34, Llanos 86, Llanos 87, Llanos 104, Llanos 123, Llanos 124, Mecaya, PUT-8, PUT-9,
PUT-36, Tacacho and Terecay Blocks in Colombia, in the Espejo Block in Ecuador, in the POT-T-785 Block in Brazil, and in
the Flamenco, Campanario and Isla Norte Blocks in Chile.

F-55

Table of Contents

The following amounts represent the Group’s share in the assets, liabilities and results of the joint operations which have been
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Income:

Subsidiary /
Joint operation
2023
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S.
Llanos 34 Block
Llanos 32 Block
Llanos 86 Block
Llanos 87 Block
Llanos 94 Block
Llanos 104 Block
Llanos 123 Block
Llanos 124 Block
CPO-5 Block
CPO-4-1 Block
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limitada Sucursal
Colombia
Mecaya Block
PUT-8 Block
PUT-9 Block
PUT-36 Block
Tacacho Block
Terecay Block
GeoPark Ecuador S.A.
Espejo
Perico
GeoPark Brasil Exploração y Produção de Petróleo e
Gas Ltda.
Manati Field
POT-T‑785
GeoPark TdF S.p.A.
Flamenco Block
Campanario Block
Isla Norte Block
GeoPark Argentina S.A.
Los Parlamentos Block
Puelen Block

Interest

PP&E

    Other      Total 
Assets

Assets

    Total 

Liabilities

    Net Assets/    

    Operating 
 (Liabilities) Revenue profit (loss)

45 % 354,361
12.5 % 2,493
50 % 5,532
50 % 16,621
50 %
—
50 % 5,536
50 % 16,292
50 %
—
30 % 182,484
102
50 %

50 % 3,948
50 % 9,118
50 % 4,454
50 % 2,950
—
50 %
—
50 %

50 % 10,072
50 % 22,231

359,440
5,079
2,493
—
5,759
227
17,271
650
—
—
5,856
320
17,327
1,035
170
170
— 182,484
109
7

51
306
68
50
103
36

213
—

3,999
9,424
4,522
3,000
103
36

10,285
22,231

(7,641)
(655)
—
(1,211)
(336)
—
(520)
(166)
(1,540)
—

(40)
—
—
—
—
—

(467)
(889)

351,799
1,838
5,759
16,060
(336)
5,856
16,807
4
180,944
109

464,146
7,811
—
1,527
—
—
8,648
—
148,594
—

3,959
9,424
4,522
3,000
103
36

—
—
—
—
—
—

9,818
21,342

1,450
17,647

10 % 5,233
160
70 %

17,546
—

22,779
160

(12,788)
—

9,991
160

14,019
—

50 %
50 %
60 %

50 %
18 %

—
—
—

—
—

—
—
—

—
2

—
—
—

—
2

(1,336)
(5,438)
(1,018)

—
(60)

(1,336)
(5,438)
(1,018)

—
(58)

—
—
—

—
—

295,556
5,661
(187)
(17,722)
(1,044)
(186)
4,006
(7,496)
50,032
(96)

(66)
(8)
(66)
(2)
(8)
(8)

(1,897)
258

4,955
—

(178)
(5,113)
(1,000)

(7,086)
(51)

F-56

   
   
Table of Contents

Subsidiary /
Joint operation
2022
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S.
Llanos 34 Block
Llanos 32 Block
Llanos 86 Block
Llanos 87 Block
Llanos 94 Block
Llanos 104 Block
Llanos 123 Block
Llanos 124 Block
CPO-5 Block
CPO-4-1 Block
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limitada Sucursal
Colombia
Mecaya Block
PUT-8 Block
PUT-9 Block
PUT-36 Block
Tacacho Block
Terecay Block
GeoPark Ecuador S.A.
Espejo
Perico
GeoPark Brasil Exploração y Produção de Petróleo
e Gas Ltda.
Manati Field
POT-T‑785
GeoPark TdF S.p.A.
Flamenco Block
Campanario Block
Isla Norte Block
GeoPark Argentina S.A.
CN-V Block
Los Parlamentos Block
Puelen Block
Sierra del Nevado Block

Interest

PP&E

    Other     Total 
Assets

 Assets

    Total 

    Net Assets/    

Liabilities

 (Liabilities) Revenue

    Operating
 profit (loss)

45 % 295,639
12.5 % 2,324
970
50 %
50 % 15,038
50 %
576
50 % 1,001
50 % 1,172
50 % 1,207
30 % 199,748
102
50 %

50 % 3,908
50 % 7,927
50 % 4,420
50 % 2,931
—
50 %
—
50 %

297,923
2,284
2,324
—
970
—
15,038
—
576
—
1,001
—
1,172
—
—
1,207
— 199,748
102
—

—
—
—
—
—
—

3,908
7,927
4,420
2,931
—
—

(2,104)
(371)
—
(41)
(233)
—
—
—
(344)
—

(17)
—
—
—
—
—

295,819
1,953
970
14,997
343
1,001
1,172
1,207
199,404
102

3,891
7,927
4,420
2,931
—
—

721,326
9,791
—
—
—
—
—
—
184,160
—

—
—
—
—
—
—

50 % 10,727
50 % 15,195

593
8,506

11,320
23,701

(5,406)
(5,315)

5,914
18,386

—
10,671

402,425
7,066
(60)
(390)
(5,632)
(60)
(60)
(60)
69,422
—

(62)
(61)
(62)
(60)
(3,699)
(300)

(5,151)
4,533

10 % 5,665
168
70 %

18,537
—

24,202
168

(12,602)
—

11,600
168

19,873
—

11,240
—

50 %
50 %
60 %

50 %
50 %
18 %
18 %

—
—
—

—
—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
10
1

—
—
—

—
—
10
1

(1,314)
(422)
(160)

(14)
(93)
(105)
(4)

(1,314)
(422)
(160)

(14)
(93)
(95)
(3)

—
—
—

—
—
—
—

(261)
(115)
(131)

(131)
(176)
(69)
(8)

F-57

   
   
Table of Contents

Subsidiary /
Joint operation
2021
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S.
Llanos 34 Block
Llanos 32 Block
Llanos 86 Block
Llanos 87 Block
Llanos 94 Block
Llanos 104 Block
Llanos 123 Block
Llanos 124 Block
CPO-5 Block
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limitada Sucursal
Colombia
Mecaya Block
PUT-8 Block
PUT-9 Block
PUT-36 Block
Tacacho Block
Terecay Block
GeoPark Perú S.A.C. - Sucursal Ecuador
Espejo
Perico
GeoPark Brasil Exploração y Produção de Petróleo
e Gas Ltda.
Manati Field
POT-T‑785
GeoPark TdF S.p.A.
Flamenco Block
Campanario Block
Isla Norte Block
GeoPark Argentina S.A.U.
CN-V Block
Los Parlamentos Block
Puelen Block
Sierra del Nevado Block

Interest

PP&E

    Other      Total 
Assets

Assets

    Total 

    Net Assets/    

Liabilities

 (Liabilities) Revenue

    Operating
 profit (loss)

45 % 260,589
12.5 % 2,730
408
50 %
50 % 1,220
50 % 1,489
434
50 %
907
50 %
50 %
841
30 % 210,154

50 % 3,837
50 % 7,070
50 % 4,342
50 % 2,870
50 % 3,629
226
50 %

262,455
1,866
2,730
—
408
—
1,220
—
1,489
—
434
—
907
—
—
841
— 210,154

—
—
—
—
—
—

3,837
7,070
4,342
2,870
3,629
226

1,210
6,107

(5,573)
(197)
—
—
(270)
—
—
—
(929)

(84)
—
—
—
—
—

(610)
(4,535)

50 % 1,132
50 % 4,658

78
1,449

256,882
2,533
408
1,220
1,219
434
907
841
209,225

486,779
7,690
—
—
—
—
—
—
88,479

341,473
5,378
(60)
(60)
(171)
(60)
(60)
(60)
55,131

3,753
7,070
4,342
2,870
3,629
226

600
1,572

—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—

10 % 6,851
157
70 %

18,269
—

25,120
157

(13,657)
—

11,463
157

20,109
—

50 %
50 %
60 %

50 %
50 %
18 %
18 %

—
—
—

—
—
—
—

—
—
—

149
—
12
1

—
—
—

149
—
12
1

(2,082)
(551)
(138)

(528)
—
(18)
(5)

(2,082)
(551)
(138)

(379)
—
(6)
(4)

—
—
—

—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—

(589)
(669)

9,899
—

(137)
(106)
(122)

(839)
(285)
(55)
(10)

Capital commitments are disclosed in Note 33.2.

Note 33     Commitments

33.1 Royalty and economic rights commitments

33.1.1 Royalty

In Colombia, royalties on production are payable to the Colombian Government and are determined on a field-by-field basis
using the level of production sliding scale detailed below:

Average daily production in barrels
Up to 5,000
5,000 to 125,000
125,000 to 400,000
400,000 to 600,000
Greater than 600,000

Production Royalty rate
8%
8% + (production - 5,000) * 0.1
20%
20% + (production - 400,000) * 0.025
25%

The production royalty rate depends on the crude quality. When the API is lower than 15°, the payment is reduced to the 75%
of the total calculation.

F-58

   
   
   
Table of Contents

In Brazil, the Brazilian National Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency (ANP) is responsible for determining monthly
minimum prices for petroleum produced in concessions for purposes of royalties payable with respect to production. Royalties
generally  correspond  to  a  percentage  ranging  between  5%  and  10%  applied  to  reference  prices  for  oil  or  natural  gas,  as
established in the relevant bidding guidelines (edital de licitação) and concession agreement. In determining the percentage of
royalties applicable to a concession, the ANP takes into consideration, among other factors, the geological risks involved and
the production levels expected. In the Manati Block, royalties are calculated at 7.5% of gas production.

In  Chile,  royalties  are  payable  to  the  Chilean  Government.  In  the  Fell  Block,  royalties  were  calculated  at  5%  of  crude  oil
production  sold  and  3%  of  gas  production  sold.  In  the  Flamenco  Block,  Campanario  Block  and  Isla  Norte  Block,  royalties
were calculated at 5% of oil and gas production sold.

33.1.2 Overriding royalty

GeoPark is obligated to pay an overriding royalty of 4% and 2.5%, respectively, to the previous owners of the Llanos 34 and
CPO-5  Blocks,  based  on  the  production  and  sale  of  hydrocarbons  discovered  in  the  blocks.  During  2023,  the  Group  has
accrued  US$  27,453,000  (US$  34,032,000  in  2022  and  US$  22,562,000  in  2021)  in  relation  with  these  overriding  royalty
agreements.  Furthermore,  there  are  overriding  royalty  agreements  in  place  from  1.2%  to  8.5%  of  the  net  production  in  the
Coati,  Mecaya,  PUT-8,  PUT-9,  Tacacho  and  Terecay  Blocks.  Since  they  are  exploratory  blocks  with  no  production  during
2023, these agreements had no impact on the Group’s results.

33.1.3 Economic rights

According to each E&P Contract, the Colombian National Hydrocarbons Agency (“ANH”) has an economic right, offered by
the operator at the moment of the ANH bid. This economic right, which is based on the production of the block after royalty
discount, is equal to 1% in the Llanos 32, Llanos 34 and Llanos 123 Blocks, 3% in the Llanos 87 Block, 23% in the CPO-5
Block and 0% in the Platanillo Block.

When the accumulated production of each field, including the royalties’ volume, exceeds 5,000,000 of barrels and the WTI
price exceeds certain price level previously determined, the Group should also deliver to ANH a share of the production net of
royalties in accordance with a formula defined in each E&P Contract, which basically depends on the WTI price and the crude
quality.

33.2 Capital commitments

During 2023, the Group incurred investments of US$ 54,640,000 to fulfil its commitments, at GeoPark’s working interest.

33.2.1 Colombia

The future investment commitments assumed by GeoPark, at its working interest, are up to:

● Llanos  32  Block:  5  exploratory  wells  before  February  20,  2022.  As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated  Financial
Statements, the total investments needed to fulfill the commitments in the block have already been incurred and the
ANH approval is pending.

● Llanos 86 Block: 3D seismic and 1 exploratory well (US$ 9,849,000) before June 19, 2026.

● Llanos 87 Block: 3D seismic reprocessing, aerogeophysic and 4 exploratory wells (US$ 13,663,000) before May 14,
2023.  As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated  Financial  Statements,  the  total  investments  needed  to  fulfill  the
commitments in the block have already been incurred and the ANH approval is pending.

● Llanos 94 Block: 1 exploratory well (US$ 3,467,000) before October 1, 2025. As of the date of these Consolidated
Financial  Statements,  GeoPark  agreed  to  transfer  its  50%  working  interest  to  its  joint  operation  partner  and  thus
GeoPark will no longer be liable for this capital commitment in the block.

F-59

Table of Contents

● Llanos 104 Block: 3D seismic and 1 exploratory well (US$ 8,752,000) before June 19, 2026.

● Llanos 123 Block: 3D seismic reprocessing, geochemistry and 2 exploratory wells (US$ 7,130,000) before January
14,  2024.  As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated  Financial  Statements,  the  total  investments  needed  to  fulfill  the
commitments in the block have already been incurred and the ANH approval is pending.

● Llanos 124 Block: 3D seismic acquisition and reprocessing, geochemistry and 3 exploratory wells (US$ 10,422,000)
before January 14, 2024. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the total investments needed to
fulfill  the  commitments  in  the  block  have  already  been  incurred  or  transferred  to  another  block,  and  the  ANH
approval is pending.

● CPO-4-1 Block: 1 exploratory well (US$ 2,922,000) before September 19, 2025.

● CPO-5 Block: 3D seismic acquisition, processing and interpretation and 1 exploratory well (US$ 2,794,000) before
May 18, 2027. Pursuant to a private agreement with the joint operation partner, the investment commitment assumed
by GeoPark amounts to US$ 9,313,000. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the exploratory
well has already been drilled and the ANH approval is pending.

● Coati Block: 3D seismic and 2D seismic acquisition (US$ 4,500,000). The evaluation area is currently suspended.
On  November  3,  2022,  GeoPark  submitted  to  the ANH  a  request  to  withdraw  from  the  exploration  period  of  the
Coati  E&P  contract  and  transfer  the  pending  commitments  to  other  E&P  contracts.  As  of  the  date  of  these
Consolidated Financial Statements, GeoPark completed the transfer of the pending commitments in the block and the
ANH approval is pending.

● Mecaya Block: 3D seismic or 1 exploratory well (US$ 2,000,000). The exploratory period is currently suspended.
Pursuant  to  a  private  agreement  with  the  joint  operation  partner,  the  investment  commitment  to  be  incurred  by
GeoPark amounts to US$ 600,000.

● PUT-8  Block:  3D  seismic  acquisition  and  reprocessing  and  3  exploratory  wells  (US$  13,107,000)  before  June  14,
2024. Part of the 3D seismic committed in the block has already been acquired during 2020 and 2021. On October
25, 2022, GeoPark submitted to the ANH a request to transfer the investment commitment related to the pending 3D
seismic to the Platanillo Block. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, such investment has been
fulfilled and the ANH approval is pending.

● PUT-9  Block:  3D  seismic  acquisition  and  2  exploratory  wells  (US$  10,550,000).  GeoPark  has  signed  a  private
agreement with the joint operation partner resulting in the total investment commitment to be incurred by GeoPark
amounting to US$ 4,365,000. The exploratory period is currently suspended.

● PUT-14  Block:  2D  seismic  acquisition  and  1  exploratory  well  (US$  16,122,000).  On  March  10,  2022,  GeoPark
submitted to the ANH a request to withdraw from the PUT-14 E&P contract and transfer the pending commitments
to the Platanillo and CPO-5 Blocks. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the total investments
needed to fulfill the commitments have already been incurred and the ANH approval is pending.

● The  PUT-36  Block  is  in  a  preliminary  phase  that  is  suspended  as  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated  Financial
Statements.  During  this  preliminary  phase,  GeoPark  must  request  from  the  Ministry  of  Interior  a  certificate  that
indicates presence or no presence of indigenous communities and develop previous consultation, if applicable. Only
when  this  process  has  been  completed  and  the  corresponding  regulatory  approvals  have  been  obtained,  the  blocks
will  enter  into  phase  1,  where  the  exploratory  commitments  are  mandatory.  The  investment  commitments  for  the
block over three-years term of phase 1 would be 3D seismic acquisition and 2 exploratory wells (US$ 11,742,000).

F-60

Table of Contents

● Tacacho Block: 2D seismic acquisition, processing and interpretation (US$ 4,080,000). GeoPark has signed a private
agreement with the joint operation partner resulting in the total investment commitment to be incurred by GeoPark
amounting  to  US$  1,224,000.  The  exploratory  period  is  currently  suspended.  On  September  21,  2022,  GeoPark
submitted to the ANH a request for termination of the E&P contract. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial
Statements, the request is under review by the ANH.

● Terecay Block: 2D seismic acquisition, processing and interpretation (US$ 4,046,000). GeoPark has signed a private
agreement with the joint operation partner resulting in the total investment commitment to be incurred by GeoPark
amounting  to  US$  2,856,000.  The  exploratory  period  is  currently  suspended.  On  September  21,  2022,  GeoPark
submitted to the ANH a request for termination of the E&P contract. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial
Statements, the request is under review by the ANH.

33.2.2 Ecuador

The investment commitments assumed by GeoPark, at its 50% working interest, in the Espejo and Perico Blocks during the
first exploratory period are up to:

● Espejo Block: 3D seismic and 4 exploratory wells before June 17, 2025 (US$ 20,912,000). As of the date of these
Consolidated  Financial  Statements,  GeoPark  has  already  performed  the  3D  seismic  and  drilled  two  of  the  four
committed exploratory wells.

● Perico  Block:  4  exploratory  wells  before  June  16,  2025  (US$  18,084,000). As  of  the  date  of  these  Consolidated
Financial  Statements,  the  total  investments  needed  to  fulfill  the  commitments  in  the  block  have  already  been
incurred.

33.2.3 Brazil

The future investment commitments assumed by GeoPark are up to:

● POT-T-785 Block: 3D seismic and electromagnetic survey before April 29, 2025 (US$ 72,000).

● REC-T-58 Block: 3D seismic and electromagnetic survey before February 14, 2025 (US$ 151,000).

● REC-T-67 Block: 3D seismic and electromagnetic survey before February 14, 2025 (US$ 151,000).

● REC-T-77 Block: 3D seismic and electromagnetic survey before February 14, 2025 (US$ 151,000).

● POT-T-834 Block: 3D seismic and electromagnetic survey before February 14, 2025 (US$ 151,000).

33.2.4 Chile

The remaining investment commitments to be assumed 100% by GeoPark for the second exploratory phase in the Campanario
and Isla Norte Blocks are up to:

● Campanario Block: 2 exploratory wells before April 25, 2024 (US$ 5,002,000).

● Isla Norte Block: 1 exploratory well before February 19, 2024 (US$ 867,000).

As of December 31, 2023, the Group has established guarantees for its total commitments.

As  part  of  the  divesting  process  detailed  in  Note  36.1,  GeoPark  remains  responsible  for  these  outstanding  investment
commitments and consequently recognized a corresponding liability as of December 31, 2023.

F-61

Table of Contents

Note 34      Related parties

Controlling interest

The main shareholders of GeoPark Limited as of December 31, 2023, based solely on Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the
SEC, are:

Shareholder
James F. Park (a)
Gerald E. O’Shaughnessy (b)
Compass Group LLC (c)
Renaissance Technologies LLC (d)
Socoservin Overseas SPF S.à.r.l. (e)
Cobas Asset Management, SGIIC, SA (f)
Other shareholders

    Common
 shares
8,817,251
3,673,392
3,312,589
3,091,863
2,889,315
2,808,406
30,734,704
55,327,520

    Percentage of outstanding  
 common shares

15.94 %
6.64 %
5.99 %
5.59 %
5.22 %
5.08 %
55.54 %
100.00 %

(a) Held by James F. Park directly and indirectly through GoodRock, LLC, which is controlled by Mr. Park. The information
set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Mr. Park’s most recent Schedule 13G
filed  with  the  SEC  on  February  14,  2024.  352,400  of  Mr.  Park’s  shares  have  been  pledged  pursuant  to  lending
arrangements.

(b) Held  by  Mr.  O’Shaughnessy  directly  and  indirectly  through  GP  Investments  LLP;  GPK  Holdings,  LLC;  The  Globe
Resources  Group,  Inc.;  and  other  investment  vehicles.  The  information  set  forth  above  and  listed  in  the  table  is  based
solely  on  the  disclosure  set  forth  in  Mr.  O’Shaughnessy  most  recent  Schedule  13D  filed  with  the  SEC  on  February  2,
2024. 3,435,000 of Mr. O’Shaughnessy’s shares have been pledged pursuant to lending arrangements.

(c) The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Compass Group LLC’s

most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024.

(d) The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Renaissance’s most

recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024.

(e) The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Socoservin Overseas’

most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on July 25, 2023.

(f) The  information  set  forth  above  and  listed  in  the  table  is  based  solely  on  the  disclosure  set  forth  in  Cobas  Asset

Management’s most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2024.

F-62

 
Table of Contents

Balances outstanding and transactions with related parties

Account (Amounts in US$´000)
2023
To be recovered from co-venturers
To be paid to co-venturers
2022
To be recovered from co-venturers
To be paid to co-venturers
Geological and geophysical expenses
Administrative expenses
2021
To be recovered from co-venturers
To be paid to co-venturers
Geological and geophysical expenses
Administrative expenses

Transaction 
in the year

    Balances    
 at year
 end

Related Party

Relationship

— 8,630
(522)
—

Joint Operations
Joint Operations

Joint Operations
Joint Operations

— 8,750
— (2,815)
160
492

Joint Operations
Joint Operations
— Carlos Gulisano
— Pedro E. Aylwin

Joint Operations
Joint Operations
Former Non-Executive Director (a)
Former Executive Director (b)

— 4,680
—
(953)
160
656

Joint Operations
Joint Operations
— Carlos Gulisano
— Pedro E. Aylwin

Joint Operations
Joint Operations
Former Non-Executive Director (a)
Former Executive Director (b)

(a) Corresponding to consultancy services. Carlos Gulisano acted as a Director of the Company until July 2022.
(b) Corresponding  to  wages  and  salaries  acting  as  Director  of  Legal  and  Governance.  In  2022,  also  includes  consultancy
services.  In  addition,  Aylwin,  Mendoza,  Luksic  &  Valencia  Law  firm,  where  Pedro  Aylwin  is  a  partner  and  has  a
participation  through Asesorías  e  Inversiones A&P  Ltda,  provided  general  legal  services  to  all  the  Chilean  entities,  in
Chilean corporate, labor, environmental, regulatory, and commercial laws.

There have been no other transactions with the Board of Directors, Executive officers, significant shareholders or other related
parties  during  the  year  besides  the  intercompany  transactions  which  have  been  eliminated  in  the  Consolidated  Financial
Statements, the normal remuneration of Board of Directors and other benefits informed in Note 11.

Note 35     Auditors Fees

Amounts in US$‘000
Audit fees
Audit related fees
Tax services fees
Total Auditors Fees

2023

2022

977
34
3
1,014

946
24
27
997

2021
1,088
—
47
1,135

Fees are shown net of VAT and other associated tax charges.

On  October  17,  2023,  Ernst  &  Young  Audit  S.A.S.  (“EY  Colombia”),  member  of  Ernst  &  Young  Global  Limited,  was
appointed  as  the  Group’s  external  auditor,  effective  for  the  consolidated  audit  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,
succeeding Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. (“EY Argentina”), also member of Ernst & Young Global Limited, that
served as the Group’s external auditor from 2020 to 2023.

Note 36     Business transactions

36.1 Chile

On  December  20,  2023,  GeoPark  signed  a  Stock  Purchase Agreement  to  sell  its  wholly  owned  subsidiary  GeoPark  Chile
S.p.A. and its subsidiaries, GeoPark Fell S.p.A., GeoPark TdF S.p.A. and GeoPark Magallanes Limitada, which comprise the
entire business of GeoPark in Chile, for a total consideration of US$ 4,000,000, subject to working capital adjustments. At that
date, GeoPark collected an advanced payment of US$ 450,000.

F-63

   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

As part of the agreement, GeoPark remains responsible for the outstanding investment commitments in the Campanario and
Isla  Norte  Blocks  for  US$  5,002,000  and  US$  867,100,  respectively.  Consequently,  as  of  December  31,  2023,  GeoPark
recognized a liability for the full amount of those commitments.

Additionally, GeoPark keeps the private right over unconventional activities that would be carried out in the Fell Block and
95% of the revenue derived from such activities over the current operating contract.

The  divestment  transaction  closed  on  January  18,  2024,  and  consequently  GeoPark  received  an  additional  payment  of  US$
2,792,000, plus a preliminary working capital adjustment of US$ 486,000. The remaining outstanding amount of US$ 758,000
was agreed to be received in 23 monthly equal installments.

As  of  December  31,  2023,  the  amount  of  Property,  plant  and  equipment  and  Right-of-use  assets  corresponding  to  the
abovementioned subsidiaries and the liabilities associated with them have been classified as held for sale for US$ 28,419,000
and  US$  26,948,000,  respectively.  Immediately  before  the  classification  as  held  for  sale,  the  recoverable  amount  of  the  net
assets was estimated and an impairment loss of US$ 13,332,000 was recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income. In
addition, the deferred income tax asset was written down for US$ 2,533,000 as it was assessed as non-recoverable due to the
transaction. The restructuring and other costs incurred because of the divestment process for US$ 3,873,000 were recognized
within the ‘Other (expenses) income’ line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

36.2 Los Parlamentos Block (Argentina)

On October 27, 2023, GeoPark agreed to transfer its 50% working interest in the Los Parlamentos Block in Argentina to its
joint operation partner and thus, once formally approved by local authorities, GeoPark will no longer be liable to remaining
capital  commitments  or  other  legal  obligations  resulting  from  its  participation  in  the  block. As  a  result  of  this  transaction,
GeoPark incurred in a net loss of US$ 2,939,000 in the Consolidated Statement of Income, which is composed by a loss of
US$ 7,023,000 within the ‘Other (expenses) income’ line item due to the payment to the joint operation partner, net of a gain
of  US$  4,084,000  within  the  ‘Foreign  exchange  (loss)  gain’  line  item  due  to  transactions  with  U.S.  dollar-denominated
Argentine securities contributed to the local subsidiary when transferred and disposed in Argentina.

36.3 Aguada Baguales, El Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks (Argentina)

In August 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the decision to evaluate farm-out or divestment opportunities to
sell its 100% working interest and operatorship in the Aguada Baguales, El Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks in Argentina,
including the associated gas transportation license through the Puesto Touquet pipeline.

On  November  3,  2021,  GeoPark  signed  a  sale  and  purchase  and  assignment  agreement  for  a  total  consideration  of  US$
16,000,000, subject to working capital adjustment. At that moment, GeoPark collected an advance payment of US$ 1,600,000.

The  divestment  transaction  closed  on  January  31,  2022,  after  the  corresponding  regulatory  approvals  were  granted  and
GeoPark  received  the  remaining  outstanding  payment  from  the  purchaser.  In April  2022,  GeoPark  paid  a  working  capital
adjustment amounting to US$ 370,000. As a consequence of this transaction, GeoPark recognized a gain of US$ 3,983,000
within the ‘Other (expenses) income’ line item.

As of December 31, 2021, the amount of Property, plant and equipment related to the blocks and the liabilities associated with
them had been classified as held for sale. Immediately before the classification as held for sale, the recoverable amount of the
blocks  was  estimated  and  an  impairment  reversal  of  US$  13,307,000  was  recognized  in  the  Consolidated  Statement  of
Income.  The  reversal  was  limited  so  that  the  carrying  amount  of  the  blocks  does  not  exceed  the  lower  of  its  recoverable
amount,  or  the  carrying  amount  that  would  have  been  determined,  net  of  depreciation,  had  no  impairment  loss  been
recognized for the blocks in prior years (see Note 37).

F-64

Table of Contents

36.4 REC-T-128 Block (Brazil)

In  2021,  GeoPark  performed  a  farm-out  transaction  to  sell  its  70%  interest  in  the  REC-T-128  Block  in  Brazil.  The  total
consideration was US$ 1,100,000, which was collected at closing in 2021, plus a contingent payment of up to US$ 710,000,
subject  to  international  oil  price  and  field  production  performance.  On  August  1,  2022,  GeoPark  collected  the  contingent
payment of US$ 710,000.

Note 37     Impairment test on Property, plant and equipment

The management of the Group considers as cash-generating unit (“CGU”) each of the blocks or group of blocks in which the
Group has working or economic interests. The blocks with no material investment on property, plant and equipment or with
operations that are not linked to oil and gas prices were not subject to the impairment test.

As  of  December  31,  2023,  the  Chilean  business  divestment  transaction  described  in  Note  36.1  was  considered  to  be  an
impairment indicator for the Fell Block, as the carrying amount of the net assets related to the block exceeded their fair value
less cost of disposal. Consequently, the net assets related to the Fell Block were impaired to their known selling price.

Additionally, Management assessed impairment indicators for each of the other CGUs, such as future Brent oil prices based
on  internal  estimates  and  other  available  sources,  the  amounts  of  reserves  certified  by  D&M,  changes  in  market  and  tax
conditions, between others, and concluded that there were no impairment indicators at year-end.

As a consequence of the evaluation, the following amounts of impairment loss were (recognized) reversed:

Amounts in US$‘000
Chile (a)
Argentina (b)

2023
(13,332)
—
(13,332)

2022

2021

— (17,641)
— 13,307
— (4,334)

(a) Recognition of impairment loss in the Fell Block due to the known selling price of the related net assets in the context of

the transaction described in Note 36.1 in 2023, and due to the decline in the proved reserves estimation in 2021.

(b) Reversal of impairment loss in the Aguada Baguales and El Porvenir Blocks due to the known market price of the blocks

in the context of the transaction described in Note 36.3.

Note 38     Supplemental information on oil and gas activities (unaudited)

The following information is presented in accordance with ASC No. 932 “Extractive Activities- Oil and Gas”, as amended by
ASU 2010 - 03 “Oil and Gas Reserves. Estimation and Disclosures”, issued by FASB in January 2010 in order to align the
current estimation and disclosure requirements with the requirements set in the SEC final rules and interpretations, published
on December 31, 2008. This information includes the Group’s oil and gas production activities carried out in each country.

Table 1 - Costs incurred in exploration, property acquisitions and development

The  following  table  presents  those  costs  capitalized  as  well  as  expensed  that  were  incurred  during  each  of  the  years  ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. The acquisition of properties includes the cost of acquisition of proved or unproved oil
and  gas  properties.  Exploration  costs  include  geological  and  geophysical  costs,  costs  necessary  for  retaining  undeveloped
properties,  drilling  costs  and  exploratory  wells  equipment.  Development  costs  include  drilling  costs  and  equipment  for
developmental  wells,  the  construction  of  facilities  for  extraction,  treatment  and  storage  of  hydrocarbons  and  all  necessary
costs to maintain facilities for the existing developed reserves.

F-65

   
   
   
Table of Contents

Amounts in US$‘000
Year ended December 31, 2023
Acquisition of properties

Proved
Unproved

Total property acquisition
Exploration
Development (a)
Total costs incurred

Amounts in US$‘000
Year ended December 31, 2022
Acquisition of properties

Proved
Unproved

Total property acquisition
Exploration
Development (a)
Total costs incurred

Amounts in US$‘000
Year ended December 31, 2021
Acquisition of properties

Proved
Unproved

Total property acquisition
Exploration
Development (a)
Total costs incurred

    Colombia

    Ecuador

Brazil

Chile

    Argentina    

Total

—
—
—
66,953
125,997
192,950

—
—
—
13,331
372
13,703

—
—
—
107
255
362

—
—
—
56
(564)
(508)

—
—
—
1,481
—
1,481

—
—
—
81,928
126,060
207,988

    Colombia     Ecuador

Brazil

Chile

    Argentina    

Total

—
—
—
48,771
89,231
138,002

—
—
—
26,521
648
27,169

—
—
—
—
(212)
(212)

—
—
—
116
9,952
10,068

—
—
—
779
—
779

—
—
—
76,187
99,619
175,806

    Colombia    

Brazil

Chile

    Argentina    

Total

—
—
—
40,828
81,310
122,138

—
—
—
3
(2,212)
(2,209)

—
—
—
3,940
1,900
5,840

—
—
—
998
2
1,000

—
—
—
45,769
81,000
126,769

(a)

Includes the effect of change in estimate of assets retirement obligations.

Table 2 - Capitalized costs related to oil and gas producing activities

The following table presents the capitalized costs as of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, for proved and unproved oil and
gas properties, and the related accumulated depreciation as of those dates.

Amounts in US$‘000
As of December 31, 2023
Proved properties (a)

Equipment, camps and other facilities
Mineral interest and wells
Other uncompleted projects

Unproved properties
Gross capitalized costs
Accumulated depreciation
Total net capitalized costs

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile (b)

Total

165,666
841,063
15,770
69,823
1,092,322
(447,716)
644,606

—
31,149
—
10,426
41,575
(8,522)
33,053

4,121
48,448
11
330
52,910
(47,388)
5,522

74,491
330,024
—
—
404,515
(379,448)
25,067

244,278
1,250,684
15,781
80,579
1,591,322
(883,074)
708,248

(a)

Includes  capitalized  amounts  related  to  asset  retirement  obligations  and  impairment  loss  recognized  in  Chile  for  US$
13,332,000.

(b) Classified as ‘Assets held for sale’ as of December 31, 2023, due to the divestment process closed in January 2024. See

Note 36.1.

F-66

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Table of Contents

Amounts in US$‘000
As of December 31, 2022
Proved properties (a)

Equipment, camps and other facilities
Mineral interest and wells
Other uncompleted projects

Unproved properties
Gross capitalized costs
Accumulated depreciation
Total net capitalized costs

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

Chile

Total

144,672
672,424
16,099
102,760
935,955
(354,981)
580,974

—
18,191
—
9,991
28,182
(2,316)
25,866

3,565
44,716
268
290
48,839
(42,885)
5,954

74,490
343,926
113
—
418,529
(371,171)
47,358

222,727
1,079,257
16,480
113,041
1,431,505
(771,353)
660,152

(a) Includes capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations.

Amounts in US$‘000
As of December 31, 2021
Proved properties (a)

Equipment, camps and other facilities
Mineral interest and wells
Other uncompleted projects

Unproved properties (b)
Gross capitalized costs
Accumulated depreciation
Total net capitalized costs

    Colombia     Brazil

Chile

    Argentina    

Total

125,078
580,931
26,136
94,419
826,564
(282,616)
543,948

3,333
42,008
250
271
45,862
(38,741)
7,121

72,766
334,993
818
—
408,577
(358,417)
50,160

201,177
—
957,932
—
27,204
—
—
94,690
— 1,281,003
— (679,774)
601,229
—

(b) Includes  capitalized  amounts  related  to  asset  retirement  obligations,  impairment  loss  recognized  in  Chile  for  US$

17,641,000 and impairment loss reversed in Argentina for US$ 13,307,000.

(a) Do not include Ecuador capitalized costs.

Table 3 - Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities

The breakdown of results of the operations shown below summarizes revenues and expenses directly associated with oil and
gas  producing  activities  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2023,  2022  and  2021.  Income  tax  for  the  years  presented  was
calculated utilizing the statutory tax rates.

Amounts in US$‘000
Year ended December 31, 2023
Revenue
Production costs, excluding depreciation

Operating costs
Royalties and economic rights in cash

Total production costs
Exploration expenses
Accretion expense (a)
Impairment loss for non-financial assets
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Results of operations before income tax
Income tax expense
Results of oil and gas operations

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile

    Argentina    

Total

702,401

19,097

14,019

15,644

— 751,161

(10,242)

(10,242)
(309)
(87)
—
(6,205)
2,254
(564)
1,690

(3,850)
— (1,096)
(4,946)
(90)
(560)

(7,678)
(548)
(8,226)
(56)
(1,478)
— (13,332)
(8,278)
(15,726)
—
(15,726)

(1,047)
7,376
(2,508)
4,868

— (142,782)
— (84,877)
— (227,659)
(38,331)
(1,481)
—
(2,794)
— (13,332)
— (108,265)
360,780
— (168,833)
191,947

(1,481)

(1,481)

(121,012)
(83,233)
(204,245)
(36,395)
(669)
—
(92,735)
368,357
(165,761)
202,596

F-67

   
   
   
Table of Contents

Amounts in US$‘000
Year ended December 31, 2022
Revenue
Production costs, excluding depreciation

Operating costs
Royalties and economic rights in cash

Total production costs
Exploration expenses
Accretion expense (a)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Results of operations before income tax
Income tax expense
Results of oil and gas operations

Amounts in US$‘000
Year ended December 31, 2021
Revenue
Production costs, excluding depreciation

Operating costs
Royalties and economic rights in cash

Total production costs
Exploration expenses
Accretion expense (a)
Impairment loss for non-financial assets
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Results of operations before income tax
Income tax (expense) benefit
Results of oil and gas operations

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile

    Argentina    

Total

978,423

10,671

19,873

29,196

1,962

1,040,125

(78,323)
(249,303)
(327,626)
(28,424)
(621)
(72,386)
549,366
(192,278)
357,088

(3,220)

(3,753)
— (1,546)
(5,299)
—
(504)
(1,509)
12,561
(4,271)
8,290

(3,220)
(4,768)
—
(2,315)
368
(92)
276

(12,961)
(1,165)
(14,126)
(116)
(1,516)
(12,754)
684
(103)
581

(1,306)
(273)
(1,579)
(779)
—
—
(396)

(99,563)
(252,287)
(351,850)
(34,087)
(2,641)
(88,964)
562,583
— (196,744)
365,839

(396)

    Colombia     Brazil

    Chile

    Argentina    

Total

618,268

20,109

21,471

28,695

688,543

(72,043)
(106,341)
(178,384)

(11,276)
(576)
—
(54,588)
373,444
(115,768)
257,676

(2,954)
(1,642)
(4,596)

(10,280)
(770)
(11,050)

(14,490)
(4,270)
(18,760)

(535)

— (4,509)
(1,319)
— (17,641)
(12,806)
(25,854)
3,878
(21,976)

(2,933)
12,045
(4,095)
7,950

(998)
(710)
13,307
(8,152)
13,382
(4,684)
8,698

(99,767)
(113,023)
(212,790)

(16,783)
(3,140)
(4,334)
(78,479)
373,017
(120,669)
252,348

(a) Represents accretion of ARO and other environmental liabilities.

Table 4 - Reserve quantity information

Estimated oil and gas reserves

Proved  reserves  represent  estimated  quantities  of  oil  (including  crude  oil  and  condensate)  and  natural  gas,  which  available
geological and engineering data demonstrates with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from known reservoirs
under  existing  economic  and  operating  conditions.  Proved  developed  reserves  are  proved  reserves  that  can  reasonably  be
expected  to  be  recovered  through  existing  wells  with  existing  equipment  and  operating  methods.  The  choice  of  method  or
combination of methods employed in the analysis of each reservoir was determined by the stage of development, quality and
reliability of basic data, and production history.

The Group believes that its estimates of remaining proved recoverable oil and gas reserve volumes are reasonable and such
estimates have been prepared in accordance with the SEC Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting rules, which were issued
by the SEC at the end of 2008.

The Group estimates its reserves at least once a year. The Group’s reserves estimation as of December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021
and  2020  was  based  on  the  DeGolyer  and  MacNaughton  Reserves  Report  (the  “D&M  Reserves  Report”).  DeGolyer  and
MacNaughton Corp. prepared its proved oil and natural gas reserve estimates in accordance with Rule 4-10 of Regulation S–
X, promulgated by the SEC, and in accordance with the oil and gas reserves disclosure provisions of ASC

F-68

   
Table of Contents

932 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) relating to Extractive Activities - Oil and Gas (formerly SFAS no.
69 Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities).

Reserves engineering is a subjective process of estimation of hydrocarbon accumulation, which cannot be exactly measured,
and  the  reserve  estimation  depends  on  the  quality  of  available  information  and  the  interpretation  and  judgement  of  the
engineers and geologists. Therefore, the reserves estimations, as well as future production profiles, are often different than the
quantities  of  hydrocarbons  which  are  finally  recovered.  The  accuracy  of  such  estimations  depends,  in  general,  on  the
assumptions on which they are based.

The estimated GeoPark net proved reserves for the properties evaluated as of December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 are
summarized as follows, expressed in thousands of barrels (Mbbl) and millions of cubic feet (MMcf):

As of December 31, 2023

As of December 31, 2022

As of December 31, 2021

As of December 31, 2020

    Oil and    

    Oil and    

    Oil and    

condensate Natural gas

condensate Natural gas

condensate Natural gas

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

    Oil and

condensate
(Mbbl)

Natural gas
(MMcf)

Net proved developed
Colombia (a)
Ecuador (b)
Brazil (c)
Chile (d)
Argentina (e)
Total consolidated

Net proved undeveloped
Colombia (f)
Ecuador (b)
Chile (d)
Argentina (g)
Total consolidated

43,120
1,017
28
619
—
44,784

16,225
1,278
479
—
17,982

1,075
—
8,888
9,956
—
19,919

46,623
322
8
1,115
—
48,068

1,065
—
9,443
14,103
—
24,611

47,766
—
43
755
1,186
49,750

1,207
—
13,601
15,196
3,379
33,383

43,817
—
34
798
1,685
46,334

— 17,765
—
—
476
855
—
—
18,241
855

— 31,019
—
—
—
575
603
—
— 32,197

— 45,240
—
—
1,229
1,563
104
—
46,573
1,563

1,695
—
13,927
19,054
5,599
40,275

—
—
5,661
—
5,661

Total proved reserves

62,766

20,774

66,309

24,611

81,947

34,946

92,907

45,936

(a) Various blocks in the Llanos Basin and the Platanillo Block in the Putumayo Basin account for 94% and 6% (96% and

4% in 2022, 98% and 2% in 2021, and 97% and 3% in 2020) of the proved developed reserves, respectively.

(b) Perico Block accounts for 100% of the reserves (Perico and Espejo Blocks accounted for 85% and 15% of the reserves,

respectively, in 2022).

(c) BCAM-40 Block accounts for 100% of the reserves.
(d) Fell Block accounts for 100% of the reserves.
(e) Aguada Baguales, Puesto Touquet and El Porvenir Blocks accounted for 45%, 21% and 33% in 2021 (50%, 26% and

24% in 2020) of the proved developed reserves, respectively.

(f) Various blocks in the Llanos Basin and the Platanillo Block in the Putumayo Basin account for 97% and 3% (95% and

5% in 2022, 97% and 3% in 2021, and 96% and 4% in 2020) of the proved undeveloped reserves, respectively.

(g) Aguada Baguales Block accounted for 100% of the proved undeveloped reserves.

F-69

   
Table of Contents

Table 5 - Net proved reserves of oil, condensate and natural gas

Net proved reserves (developed and undeveloped) of oil and condensate:

Thousands of barrels
Reserves as of December 31, 2020
Increase (decrease) attributable to:

Revisions (a)
Extensions and discoveries (b)
Production

Reserves as of December 31, 2021
Increase (decrease) attributable to:

Revisions (c)
Extensions and discoveries (d)
Disposal of Minerals in place (e)
Production

Reserves as of December 31, 2022
Increase (decrease) attributable to:

Revisions (f)
Extensions and discoveries (g)
Production

Reserves as of December 31, 2023

Colombia
89,057

Ecuador
—

Brazil
34

Chile
2,027

Argentina
1,789

Total
92,907

(3,207)
3,375
(10,440)
78,785

(2,677)
204
—
(11,924)
64,388

3,617
2,549
(11,209)
59,345

—
—
—
—

—
632
—
(310)
322

324
1,937
(288)
2,295

18
—
(9)
43

(27)
—
—
(8)
8

26
—
(6)
28

(597)
—
(100)
1,330

(169)
603
(434)
1,789

(3,955)
3,978
(10,983)
81,947

— (2,282)
422
836
—
—
(1,760)
— (1,760)
(29)
(12,432)
— 66,309

(161)
1,591

(412)
—
(81)
1,098

3,555
—
—
4,486
— (11,584)
— 62,766

(a) For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Group’s oil and condensate proved reserves were revised downward by 4.0

mmbbl. The primary factors leading to the above were:
- Lower than expected performance from the existing wells that reduced the proved developed reserves in Colombia (8.9

mmbbl), in Argentina (0.3 mmbbl), and in Chile (0.3 mmbbl).

- A decrease of 0.6 mmbbl in Chile due to a change in a previously adopted development plan in the Fell Block.
- Such decrease was partially offset by a higher average oil prices resulted in a 5.7 mmbbl, 0.1 mmbbl and 0.3 mmbbl

increase in reserves from the blocks in Colombia, Argentina and Chile, respectively.

(b)

In Colombia, the extensions and discoveries are primary due to the Tigui Field appraisal wells and in Argentina are due
to the Aguada Baguales Field.

(c) For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Group’s oil and condensate proved reserves were revised downward by 2.3

mmbbl. The primary factors leading to the above were:
- A decrease of 3.6 mmbbl in Colombia due to a change in the royalties payment in certain fields from cash to kind.
- Such decrease was partially offset by a higher average oil prices resulted in a 0.6 mmbbl and 0.1 mmbbl increase in

reserves from the blocks in Colombia and Chile, respectively.

- Higher than expected performance from the existing wells that increase the proved reserves in Colombia (0.3 mmbbl)

and in Chile (0.3 mmbbl).

(d)

In Colombia, the extensions and discoveries are primary due to the Cante Flamenco new field in CPO-5 Block and in
Ecuador are due to the Jandaya, Yin and Tui new fields in the Perico Block and the Pashuri field in the Espejo Block.
(e) The disposal in Argentina is due to the decision of selling the Group’s working interest and operatorship in the Aguada

Baguales, El Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks in Argentina (see Note 36.3).

(f) For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Group’s oil and condensate proved reserves were revised upwards by 3.5

mmbbl. The primary factors leading to the above were:
- An increase of 1.7 mmbbl in Colombia due to a change in a previously adopted development plan.
- An increase of 1.5 mmbbl in Colombia due to higher-than-expected performance from the existing wells.
- An increase of 0.4 mmbbl in Colombia due to a change in the royalties’ payment in certain fields from kind to cash.
- An increase of 0.3 mmbbl in Ecuador due to higher average oil prices.
- Such increase was partially offset by lower-than-expected performance from the existing wells in Chile by 0.4 mmbbl.
(g) The extensions and discoveries are primarily due to various fields in the Llanos Basin in Colombia and the Jandaya field

extension in the Perico Block in Ecuador.

F-70

Table of Contents

Net proved reserves (developed and undeveloped) of natural gas:

Millions of cubic feet
Reserves as of December 31, 2020
Increase (decrease) attributable to:

Revisions (a)
Production

Reserves as of December 31, 2021
Increase (decrease) attributable to:

Revisions (b)
Disposal of Minerals in place (c)
Production

Reserves as of December 31, 2022
Increase (decrease) attributable to:

Revisions (d)
Production

Reserves as of December 31, 2023

    Colombia     Brazil

    Chile

1,695

13,927

24,715

    Argentina    
5,599

Total
45,936

14
(502)
1,207

141
—
(283)
1,065

219
(209)
1,075

3,470
(3,796)
13,601

(886)
—
(3,272)
9,443

1,659
(2,214)
8,888

(3,553)
(4,403)
16,759

1,501
—
(4,157)
14,103

(9)
(3,283)
10,811

(636)
(1,584)
3,379

(705)
(10,285)
34,946

—
(3,227)
(152)
—

756
(3,227)
(7,864)
24,611

1,869
—
—
(5,706)
— 20,774

(a) For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Group’s proved natural gas reserves were revised downward by 0.7 billion

cubic feet. This was the combined effect of:
- A  decrease  of  proved  developed  reserves  due  to  lower  performance  of  existing  wells  in Argentina  (1.6  billion  cubic
feet)  and  in  Chile  (2.7  billion  cubic  feet)  partially  offset  by  better-than-expected  performance  in  the  Manati  Field  in
Brazil (2.5 billion cubic feet).
- A decrease of 3.4 billion cubic feet in Chile due to the revision of the type well associated with the incremental activity
that reduced the proved undeveloped reserves.
- A  decrease  of  1.5  billion  cubic  feet  in  Chile  due  to  a  change  in  a  previously  adopted  development  plan  in  the  Fell
Block.
-Such  decrease  was  partially  offset  by  higher  average  prices  which  resulted  in  an  increase  of  4.0  billion  cubic  feet,  1
billion cubic feet and 1 billion cubic feet in Chile, Brazil, and Argentina, respectively.

(b) For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  the  Group’s  proved  natural  gas  reserves  were  revised  upwards  by  0.8  billion

cubic feet. This was the combined effect of:
- An  increase  of  proved  reserves  due  to  better  performance  of  existing  wells  in  Chile  (0.8  billion  cubic  feet)  and  the
Llanos 32 block in Colombia (0.1 billion cubic feet).
- Higher average prices resulted in an increase of 0.7 billion cubic feet and 0.8 billion cubic feet increase in gas reserves
in Chile and Brazil, respectively.
- The above was partially offset by lower-than-expected performance of Manati Field in Brazil (1.6 billion cubic feet).
(c) The disposal in Argentina is due to the decision of selling the Group’s working interest and operatorship in the Aguada

Baguales, El Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks in Argentina (see Note 36.3).

(d) For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023,  the  Group’s  proved  natural  gas  reserves  were  revised  upwards  by  1.9  billion
cubic feet. This was the effect of higher-than-expected performance from the existing wells in the Manati Block in Brazil
(1.7 billion cubic feet) and the Llanos 32 Block in Colombia (0.2 billion cubic feet).

Revisions refer to changes in interpretation of discovered accumulations and some technical and logistical needs in the area
obliged to modify the timing and development plan of certain fields under appraisal and development phases.

Table 6 - Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves

The following table discloses estimated future net cash flows from future production of proved developed and undeveloped
reserves of crude oil, condensate and natural gas. As prescribed by SEC Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting rules and
ASC  932  of  the  FASB Accounting  Standards  Codification  (ASC)  relating  to  Extractive Activities  –  Oil  and  Gas  (formerly
SFAS no. 69 Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities), such future net cash flows were estimated using the average
first  day-of-the-month  price  during  the  12-month  period  for  2023,  2022  and  2021  and  using  a  10%  annual  discount  factor.
Future development and abandonment costs include estimated drilling costs, development and exploitation

F-71

Table of Contents

installations and abandonment costs. These future development costs were estimated based on evaluations made by the Group.
The future income tax was calculated by applying the statutory tax rates in effect in the respective countries in which we have
interests, as of the date this supplementary information was filed.

This  standardized  measure  is  not  intended  to  be  and  should  not  be  interpreted  as  an  estimate  of  the  market  value  of  the
Group’s reserves. The purpose of this information is to give standardized data to help the users of the financial statements to
compare different companies and make certain projections. It is important to point out that this information does not include,
among other items, the effect of future changes in prices, costs and tax rates, which past experience indicates that are likely to
occur,  as  well  as  the  effect  of  future  cash  flows  from  reserves  which  have  not  yet  been  classified  as  proved  reserves,  of  a
discount factor more representative of the value of money over the lapse of time and of the risks inherent to the production of
oil and gas. These future changes may have a significant impact on the future net cash flows disclosed below. For all these
reasons, this information does not necessarily indicate the perception the Group has on the discounted future net cash flows
derived from the reserves of hydrocarbons.

Amounts in US$‘000
As of December 31, 2023
Future cash inflows
Future production costs
Future development costs
Future income taxes
Undiscounted future net cash flows
10% annual discount
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
As of December 31, 2022
Future cash inflows
Future production costs
Future development costs
Future income taxes
Undiscounted future net cash flows
10% annual discount
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
As of December 31, 2021
Future cash inflows
Future production costs
Future development costs
Future income taxes
Undiscounted future net cash flows
10% annual discount
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil

    Chile

    Argentina    

Total

140,607
(45,052)
(13,768)
(27,648)
54,139
(11,436)
42,703

75,757
(22,815)
(1,204)
(4,036)
47,702
(6,476)
41,226

26,553
(8,094)
(297)

65,002
(29,519)
(1,955)
— (1,761)
31,767
(8,856)
22,911

18,162
(2,504)
15,658

— 89,208
— (34,930)
— (1,955)
— (3,449)
— 48,874
— (7,171)
— 41,703

111,384
(50,343)
(41,359)
—
19,682
5,205
24,887

190,449
(72,411)
(40,659)
—
77,379
(13,094)
64,285

136,152
(69,067)
(40,339)
—
26,746
6,121
32,867

— 4,355,434
— (1,752,099)
(203,376)
—
—
(795,993)
— 1,603,966
—
(442,957)
— 1,161,009

— 5,511,603
— (1,743,842)
—
(225,612)
— (1,193,419)
— 2,348,730
—
(864,075)
— 1,484,655

109,678
(61,660)
(49,200)
(2,947)
(4,129)
4,471
342

4,716,229
(1,881,211)
(288,955)
(760,601)
1,785,462
(492,729)
1,292,733

4,027,686
(1,633,889)
(147,045)
(764,309)
1,482,443
(430,250)
1,052,193

5,229,599
(1,633,818)
(182,701)
(1,191,658)
2,221,422
(839,621)
1,381,801

4,381,191
(1,715,554)
(197,461)
(754,205)
1,713,971
(496,150)
1,217,821

F-72

Table of Contents

Table 7 - Changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves

    Colombia     Ecuador     Brazil
— 25,378

759,233

Amounts in US$‘000
Present value as of December 31, 2020
Sales of hydrocarbon, net of production costs
Net changes in sales price and production costs
Changes in estimated future development costs
Extensions and discoveries less related costs
Development costs incurred
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
Net changes in income taxes
Accretion of discount
Present value as of December 31, 2021
Sales of hydrocarbon, net of production costs
Net changes in sales price and production costs
Changes in estimated future development costs
Extensions and discoveries less related costs
Development costs incurred
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
Disposal of Minerals in place
Net changes in income taxes
Accretion of discount
Present value as of December 31, 2022
Sales of hydrocarbon, net of production costs
Net changes in sales price and production costs
Changes in estimated future development costs
Extensions and discoveries less related costs
Development costs incurred
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
Net changes in income taxes
Accretion of discount
Present value as of December 31, 2023

    Chile

    Argentina    

17,032

(11,520)
64,048
(18,731)
—
4,111
(23,776)
—
1,703
32,867

(19)

(16,855)
(3,145)
20,674
(1,020)
—
465
244
(2)
342

Total
801,624

(560,896)
1,005,171
99,168
79,913
91,988
(88,204)
(257,154)
121,123
1,292,733

— (15,677)
— 19,393
861
—
—
—
—
—
— 11,957
— (2,780)
—
2,571
— 41,703

(2,732)

(15,317)
(14,697)
39,457
— (6,909)
(22,675)
(933)
—
—
— 11,153
15,513
—
—
3,287
64,285

(10,483)
28,873
—
— (2,441)
—
—
1,673
—
4,515
—
22,911
15,658

(6,673)
(2,893)
(17,908)
63,619
500
10,642
(21,808)
1,566
42,703

(8,143)
21,490
(4,440)
—
—
9,159
(2,218)
2,467
41,226

(6,362)
(33,595)
5,142
—
7
(11,019)
—
6,429
24,887

— (924,280)
989,474
—
59,566
—
35,627
—
105,348
—
(74,779)
—
(342)
(342)
— (203,697)
—
205,005
— 1,484,655

— (512,703)
— (611,666)
(7,745)
—
136,376
—
116,503
—
113,038
—
174,743
—
—
267,808
— 1,161,009

(516,844)
924,875
96,364
80,933
87,877
(76,850)
(254,618)
116,851
1,217,821

(891,534)
956,926
93,657
6,754
94,195
(87,851)
—
(205,370)
197,203
1,381,801

(491,525)
(596,668)
9,461
72,757
115,996
104,256
198,769
257,346
1,052,193

F-73

Exhibit 2.4

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The following description of our capital stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to
and qualified in its entirety by reference to our by-laws, which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023 of which this Exhibit is a part. We encourage
you to read the bylaws for additional information.

General

We  are  an  exempted  company  with  limited  liability  incorporated  under  the  laws  of  Bermuda  with  registration
number 33273 from the Registrar of Companies. The rights of our shareholders will be governed by Bermuda law
and  by  our  memorandum  of  association  and  by-laws.  Bermuda  company  law  differs  in  some  material  respects
from  the  laws  generally  applicable  to  Delaware  corporations.  Below  is  a  summary  of  some  of  those  material
differences.

Share Capital

Our share capital consists of common shares only. Our authorized share capital consists of 5,171,949,000
common  shares  of  par  value  US$0.001  per  share. As  of  March  19,  2024,  there  are  55,470,850  common  shares
outstanding. All of our issued and outstanding common shares are fully paid and non-assessable. We also have
employee  incentive  programs,  pursuant  to  which  we  have  granted  share  awards  to  our  senior  management  and
certain key employees.

According to our bye-laws, if our share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached
to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may, whether or not the
Company  is  being  wound-up,  be  varied  with  the  consent  in  writing  of  the  holders  of  at  least  two-thirds  of  the
issued shares of that class or with the sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of the votes cast at a separate
general  meeting  of  the  holders  of  the  shares  of  the  class  at  which  meeting  the  necessary  quorum  shall  be  two
persons  at  least,  in  person  or  by  proxy,  holding  or  representing  one-third  of  the  issued  shares  of  the  class. The
rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class issued with preferred or other rights shall not, unless
otherwise  expressly  provided  by  the  terms  of  issue  of  the  shares  of  that  class,  be  deemed  to  be  varied  by  the
creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu therewith.

Our  bye-laws  give  our  board  of  directors  the  power  to  issue  any  unissued  shares  of  the  company  on  such
terms  and  conditions  as  it  may  determine,  subject  to  the  terms  of  the  bye-laws  and  any  resolution  of  the
shareholders to the contrary.

Shareholders’ rights

Holders of our common shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of holders
of common shares. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any issued and outstanding preference shares,
holders of common shares are entitled to receive such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by
our board of directors out of funds legally available for dividend payments. Holders of common shares have no
redemption, sinking fund, conversion, exchange or other subscription rights. In the event of our liquidation, the
holders  of  common  shares  are  entitled  to  share  equally  and  ratably  in  our  assets,  if  any,  remaining  after  the
payment  of  all  of  our  debts  and  liabilities,  subject  to  any  liquidation  preference  on  any  outstanding  preference
shares.

Election and Removal of Directors

Our  bye-laws  provide  that  our  board  of  directors  will  determine  the  maximum  size  of  the  board,  provided
that  it  shall  be  not  be  composed  of  fewer  than  three  directors.  The  maximum  number  of  directors  currently
allowed is nine directors and our board of directors currently consists of nine directors.

Our bye-laws provide that our directors shall hold office for such term as the shareholders shall determine or,
in the absence of such determination, until the next annual general meeting or until their successors are elected or
appointed  or  their  office  is  otherwise  vacated.  Directors  whose  term  has  expired  may  offer  themselves  for  re-
election at each election of the directors.

Under our bye-laws, a director may be removed by a resolution adopted by 65% or more of the votes cast by
shareholders who (being entitled to do so) vote in person or by proxy at any general meeting of the shareholders
in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  our  bye-laws.  Notice  convened  for  the  purpose  of  removing  the  director,
containing a statement of the intention to do so, must be served on such director not less than 14 days before the
meeting.

Any vacancy created by the removal of a director at a special general meeting may be filled at that meeting
by  the  election  of  another  director  in  his  or  her  place  or,  in  the  absence  of  any  such  election,  by  the  board  of
directors. Any other vacancy, including a newly created directorship, may be filled by our board of directors.

Meetings of Shareholders

Under  Bermuda  law,  a  company  is  required  to  convene  the  annual  general  meeting  of  shareholders  each
calendar year, unless the shareholders in a general meeting, elect to dispense with the holding of annual general
meetings. Under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, a special general meeting of shareholders may be called by the
board of directors and may be called upon the requisition of shareholders holding not less than 10% of the paid-
up capital of the company carrying the right to vote at general meetings of shareholders.

Our bye-laws provide that, at any general meeting of the shareholders, the presence in person or by proxy of
two or more shareholders representing in excess of 50% of the total issued voting shares of the company shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business unless the company only has one shareholder, in which case
such  shareholder  shall  constitute  a  quorum.  Unless  otherwise  required  by  law  or  by  our  bye-laws,  shareholder
action requires a resolution adopted by a majority of votes cast by shareholders at a general meeting at which a
quorum is present.

Shareholder Proposals

Under Bermuda law, shareholders holding at least 5% of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having
at the date of the requisition a right to vote at the meeting to which the requisition relates or any group composed
of  at  least  100  or  more  shareholders  may  require  a  proposal  to  be  submitted  to  an  annual  general  meeting  of
shareholders.  Under  our  bye-laws,  any  shareholders  wishing  to  nominate  a  person  for  election  as  a  director  or
propose business to be transacted at a meeting of shareholders must provide (among other things) advance notice,
as set out in our bye-laws. Shareholders may only propose a person for election as a director at an annual general
meeting.

Shareholder action by written consent

Our bye-laws provide that, except for the removal of auditors and directors, any actions which shareholders
may take at a general meeting of shareholders may be taken by the shareholders through the unanimous written
consent of the shareholders who would be entitled to vote on the matter at the general meeting.

Amendment of memorandum of association and bye-laws

Our memorandum of association and bye-laws may be amended with the approval of a majority of our board
of directors and by a resolution by a majority of the votes cast by shareholders who (being entitled to do so) vote
in person or by proxy at any general meeting of the shareholders in accordance with the provisions of the bye-
laws.

Business combinations

A  Bermuda  company  may  engage  in  a  business  combination  pursuant  to  a  tender  offer,  amalgamation,
merger or sale of assets. The amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company generally
requires the amalgamation or merger agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and by its
shareholders. Shareholder approval is not required where (a) a holding company and one or more of its wholly-
owned subsidiary companies amalgamate or merge or (b) two or more wholly-owned subsidiary companies of the
same  holding  company  amalgamate  or  merge.  Under  the  Bermuda  Companies Act  (save  for  such  “short-form
amalgamations”),  unless  a  company’s  bye-laws  provide  otherwise,  the  approval  of  75%  of  the  shareholders
voting at a meeting is required to pass a resolution to approve the amalgamation or merger agreement, and the
quorum for such meeting must be two persons holding or representing more than one-third of the issued shares of
the  company.  Our  bye-laws  provide  that  an  amalgamation  or  merger  will  require  the  approval  of  our  board  of
directors and of our shareholders by a resolution adopted by 65% or more of the votes cast by shareholders who
(being entitled to do so) vote in person or by proxy at any general meeting of the shareholders in accordance with
the  provisions  of  the  bye-laws.  Under  Bermuda  law,  in  the  event  of  an  amalgamation  or  merger  of  a  Bermuda
company with another company or corporation, a shareholder who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or
merger  and  who  is  not  satisfied  that  fair  value  has  been  offered  for  such  shareholder’s  shares  may,  within
one  month  of  the  notice  of  the  shareholders  meeting,  apply  to  the  Supreme  Court  of  Bermuda  to  appraise  the
value of those shares.

Under the Bermuda Companies Act, we are not required to seek the approval of our shareholders for the sale
of  all  or  substantially  all  of  our  assets.  However,  Bermuda  courts  will  view  decisions  of  the  English  courts  as
highly persuasive and English authorities suggest that such sales do require shareholder approval. Our bye-laws
provide that the directors shall manage the business of the Company and may exercise all such powers as are not,
by  the  Bermuda  Companies  Act  or  by  these  Bye-laws,  required  to  be  exercised  by  the  Company  in  general
meeting and may pay all expenses incurred in promoting and incorporating the company and may exercise all the
powers of the Company including, but not by way of limitation, the power to borrow money and to mortgage or
charge  all  or  any  part  of  the  undertaking  property  and  assets  (present  and  future)  and  uncalled  capital  of  the
Company  and  to  issue  debentures  and  other  securities,  whether  outright  or  as  collateral  security  for  any  debt,
liability or obligation of the Company or any other persons.

Under Bermuda law, where an offer is made for shares of a company and, within four months of the offer, the
holders of not less than 90% of the shares not owned by the offeror, its subsidiaries or their nominees accept such
offer, the offeror may by notice require the non-tendering shareholders to transfer their shares on the terms of the
offer.  Dissenting  shareholders  do  not  have  express  appraisal  rights  but  are  entitled  to  seek  relief  (within
one month of the compulsory acquisition notice) from the court, which has power to make such orders as it thinks
fit. Additionally, where one or more parties hold not less than 95% of the shares of a company, such parties may,
pursuant  to  a  notice  given  to  the  remaining  shareholders,  acquire  the  shares  of  such  remaining  shareholders.
Dissenting  shareholders  have  a  right  to  apply  to  the  court  for  appraisal  of  the  value  of  their  shares  within
one  month  of  the  compulsory  acquisition  notice.  If  a  dissenting  shareholder  is  successful  in  obtaining  a  higher
valuation,  that  valuation  must  be  paid  to  all  shareholders  being  squeezed  out  or  the  purchaser  may  cancel  the
purchase notice sent.

Shareholder Suits

Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under Bermuda law. The
Bermuda  courts,  however,  would  ordinarily  be  expected  to  permit  a  shareholder  to  commence  an  action  in  the
name of a company to remedy a wrong to the company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the
corporate  power  of  the  company  or  illegal,  or  would  result  in  the  violation  of  the  company’s  memorandum  of
association or bye-laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by a Bermuda court to acts that are alleged to
constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders or where an act requires the approval of a greater percentage
of the company’s shareholders than that which actually approved it.

When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner which is oppressive or prejudicial to
the interests of some part of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply under the Bermuda Companies
Act for an order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda, which may make such order as it sees fit, including an order
regulating  the  conduct  of  the  company’s  affairs  in  the  future  or  ordering  the  purchase  of  the  shares  of  any
shareholders by other shareholders or by the company.

Our bye-laws contain a provision through which we and our shareholders waive any claim or right of
action that we or they have, both individually and on our behalf, against any director or officer in relation to any
action or failure to take action by such director or officer, including the breach of any fiduciary duty, except in
respect of any fraud or dishonesty of such director or officer.

Dividends and Repurchase of Shares

Pursuant to our bye-laws, our board of directors has the authority to declare dividends and authorize the
repurchase of shares subject to applicable law. Under Bermuda law, a company may not declare or pay a dividend
if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its
liabilities as they become due or the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than its liabilities. Under
Bermuda  law,  a  company  cannot  purchase  its  own  shares  if  there  are  reasonable  grounds  for  believing  that  the
company is, or after the repurchase would be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due.

Access to Books and Records and Dissemination of Information

Members of the general public have a right to inspect the public documents of a company available at
the office of the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda. These documents include the company’s memorandum of
association and any amendments thereto. The shareholders have the additional right to inspect the bye-laws of the
company,  minutes  of  general  meetings  of  shareholders  and  the  company’s  audited  financial  statements.  The
company’s audited financial statements must be presented at the annual general meeting of shareholders, unless
the board and all the shareholders agree to the waiving of the audited financials. The company’s share register is
open to inspection by shareholders and by members of the general public without charge. A company is required
to  maintain  its  share  register  in  Bermuda  but  may,  subject  to  the  provisions  of  the  Bermuda  Companies Act,
establish  a  branch  register  outside  of  Bermuda.  Bermuda  law  does  not,  however,  provide  a  general  right  for
shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other corporate records.

Comparison of Bermuda law to Delaware Corporate Law

Our  shareholders  could  have  more  difficulty  protecting  their  interests  than  would  shareholders  of  a
corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States. As a Bermuda company, we are governed by our
memorandum  of  association  and  bye-laws  and  Bermuda  company  law.  The  provisions  of  the  Bermuda
Companies Act,  which  applies  to  us,  differs  in  some  material  respects  from  laws  generally  applicable  to  U.S.
corporations  and  shareholders,  including  the  provisions  relating  to  mergers  and  acquisitions,  takeovers  and
shareholder lawsuits. Set forth below is a summary of these provisions, as well as modifications adopted pursuant
to  our  bye-laws,  which  differ  in  certain  respects  from  provisions  of  Delaware  corporate  law.  Because  the
following statements are summaries, they do not discuss all aspects of Bermuda law that may be relevant to us
and our shareholders.

Amalgamations,  Mergers  and  Similar  Arrangements.  Pursuant  to  the  Bermuda  Companies  Act,  the
amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation requires the amalgamation
or merger agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and, under certain circumstances, by its
shareholders. Under our bye-laws, an amalgamation or merger will require the approval of our board of directors
and our shareholders by Special Resolution, which is a resolution adopted by 65% of more of the votes cast by
shareholders who (being entitled to do so) vote in person or by proxy at any general meeting of the shareholders
in accordance with the provisions of the bye-laws and the quorum for any general meeting must be two or more
persons,  in  person  or  by  proxy,  representing  in  excess  of  50%  of  the  total  of  our  issued  voting  shares.  Under
Bermuda  law,  in  the  event  of  an  amalgamation  or  merger  of  a  Bermuda  company  with  another  company  or
corporation, a shareholder of the Bermuda company who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or merger and
who is not satisfied that he has been offered fair

value for his shares may, within one month of notice of the shareholders meeting, apply to the Supreme Court of
Bermuda to appraise the fair value of those shares.

Under Delaware law, with certain exceptions, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all
the  assets  of  a  corporation  must  be  approved  by  the  board  of  directors  and  a  majority  of  the  issued  and
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. Under Delaware law, a shareholder of a corporation participating in
certain major corporate transactions may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights pursuant to
which such shareholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair value of the shares held by such shareholder
(as  determined  by  a  court)  in  lieu  of  the  consideration  such  shareholder  would  otherwise  receive  in  the
transaction.

Shareholders’  Suits.  Class  actions  and  derivative  actions  are  generally  not  available  to  shareholders
under  Bermuda  law.  The  Bermuda  courts,  however,  would  ordinarily  be  expected  to  permit  a  shareholder  to
commence an action in the name of a company to remedy a wrong to the company where the act complained of is
alleged  to  be  beyond  the  corporate  power  of  the  company  or  illegal,  or  would  result  in  the  violation  of  the
company’s  memorandum  of  association  or  bye-laws.  When  the  affairs  of  a  company  are  being  conducted  in  a
manner  which  is  oppressive  or  prejudicial  to  the  interests  of  some  part  of  the  shareholders,  one  or  more
shareholders may apply for an order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda regulating the conduct of the company’s
affairs  in  the  future  or  an  order  to  purchase  the  shares  of  any  shareholders  by  other  shareholders  or  by  the
company and, in the case of a purchase by the company, for the reduction accordingly of the company’s capital,
or otherwise.

Our bye-laws contain a provision by virtue of which we and our shareholders waive any claim or right of
action that they have, both individually and on our behalf, against any director or officer in relation to any action
or failure to take action by such director or officer, including the breach of any fiduciary duty, except in respect of
any fraud or dishonesty of such director or officer. Class actions and derivative actions generally are available to
shareholders under Delaware law for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and actions
not taken in accordance with applicable law. In such actions, the court has discretion to permit the winning party
to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action.

Exhibit 8.1

Jurisdiction

Details of the subsidiaries of GeoPark Limited as of December 31, 2023, are set out below:

Name
GeoPark Argentina S.A.
GeoPark Brasil Exploração e Produção de Petróleo e Gás Ltda.
GeoPark Chile S.p.A.
GeoPark Fell S.p.A.
GeoPark Magallanes Limitada
GeoPark TdF S.p.A.
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S.
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. Sucursal Panama
GeoPark Colombia S.L.U.
GeoPark Perú S.A.C.
GeoPark Ecuador S.A.
GeoPark México S.A.P.I. de C.V.
GeoPark E&P S.A.P.I. de C.V.
GeoPark (UK) Limited
Amerisur Resources Limited
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limited
Amerisur Exploración Colombia Limited Sucursal Colombia
Yarumal S.A.S.
Fenix Oil & Gas Limited
Fenix Oil & Gas Limited Sucursal Colombia
Amerisurexplor Ecuador S.A.
Amerisur S.A.
Market Access LLP

  Argentina
  Brazil
  Chile
  Chile
  Chile
  Chile
  Colombia
Panama

  Spain
  Peru
  Ecuador
  Mexico
Mexico
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
British Virgin Islands
Colombia
Colombia
British Virgin Islands
Colombia
Ecuador
  Paraguay
  United States

    
CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 12.1

I, Andrés Ocampo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of  the  circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were  made,  not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The  company’s  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  and  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f)) for the company and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period  covered  by  the  annual  report  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to  the  company’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the  company’s  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a. All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the  design  or  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the

company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2024

/s/ Andrés Ocampo
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

 
 
 
CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 12.2

I, Jaime Caballero Uribe, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the  company  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods
presented in this report;

4. The  company’s  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  and  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f)) for the company and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be
designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the
period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to  the  company’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the  company’s  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b. Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the

company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2024

/s/ Jaime Caballero Uribe
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 
 
 
CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 13.1

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”), I, Andrés Ocampo, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.
2.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations of the Company.

Date: March 27, 2024

/s/ Andrés Ocampo
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

 
 
 
CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”), I, Jaime Caballero Uribe, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.
2.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations of the Company.

Exhibit 13.2

Date: March 27, 2024

/s/ Jaime Caballero Uribe
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 
 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No 333-201016, No.333-214291, No.333-228762 
and No.333-228763) of GeoPark Limited of our reports dated March 27, 2024, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of 
GeoPark Limited and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of GeoPark Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 
20-F) of GeoPark Limited for the year ended December 31, 2023. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the headings 
“Presentation of Financial and Other Information”, “ITEM 15.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES”, “ITEM 16C.  Principal Accountant 
Fees and Services” and “ITEM 16F.  Change in registrant’s certifying accountant” in this Form 20-F.

Exhibit 15.1

ERNST & YOUNG AUDIT S.A.S.

By /s/ Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S.

Ernst & Young Audit S.A.S.
Member of Ernst & Young Global Limited

Bogota, Colombia
March 27, 2024

 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No 333-201016, No.333-214291, No.333-228762
and  No.333-228763)  of  GeoPark  Limited  of  our  report  dated  March  8,  2023,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of
GeoPark Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of GeoPark Limited for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Exhibit 15.2

PISTRELLI, HENRY MARTIN Y ASOCIADOS S.R.L.

By /s/ Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L.                 

Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L.
Member of Ernst & Young Global Limited

Buenos Aires, Argentina
March 27, 2024

 
 
Exhibit 15.3

DeGolyer and MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

March 27, 2024

GeoPark Limited
Calle 94 N° 11-30, 8o floor
Bogotá, Colombia

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 As an independent petroleum consulting firm, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to our year-end 2023 report of 

third party dated March 1, 2024, to be used under certain headings contained in the Annual Report of GeoPark Limited on Form 20-F for the 
year ended December 31, 2023, and specified in our consent letter dated March 27, 2024, addressed to GeoPark Limited, which is 
referenced in the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-201016, 333-214291, and 333-228763) under the 
headings “PART II – Item 3. Incorporation of Documents by Reference” and “Part II – Item 8. Exhibits” and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-
228762) under the heading “Part II – Item 8. Exhibits.”

Very truly yours,

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

DeGolyer and MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

March 27, 2024

GeoPark Limited
Calle 94 N° 11 30, 8o floor
Bogotá, Colombia

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 We hereby consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to the inclusion of and information derived from our 2023 

year-end report of third party dated March 1, 2024, regarding our independent estimates of the net proved oil, condensate, gas, and oil 
equivalent reserves, as of December 31, 2023, of certain selected properties in which GeoPark Limited has represented it holds an interest in 
Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Ecuador (our “Report”), as set forth under the headings “Presentation of Financial and Other Information–Oil 
and gas reserves and production information,” “Item 3. Key Information–D. Risk factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company–B. 
Business Overview,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects–A. Operating results,” “Item 19 Exhibits,” and “GeoPark 
Limited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023” and as Exhibit No. 99.1 in the Annual Report 
on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited (the “Annual Report”).

We  confirm  that  we  have  read  the  Annual  Report  and  have  no  reason  to  believe  that  there  are  any  misrepresentations  in  the
information contained therein that are derived from our Report or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services performed by us
in connection with the preparation of our Report.

Very truly yours,

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

Exhibit 15.4

March 27, 2024

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read item 16.F – “Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant” of the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2023 of GeoPark Limited. We agree with the statements contained therein in relation to Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L. We
have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L.
PISTRELLI, HENRY MARTIN Y ASOCIADOS S.R.L.
Member of Ernst & Young Global Limited

GEOPARK LIMITED
COMPENSATION RECOUPMENT POLICY

Exhibit 97.1

This GeoPark Compensation Recoupment Policy (the “Clawback Policy” or the “Policy”) has been adopted by the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of GeoPark Limited (the “Company”) on 7 November 2023, following the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of
the Company. This Policy provides for the recoupment of certain executive compensation in the event of an accounting restatement resulting
from  material  noncompliance  with  financial  reporting  requirements  under  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  in  accordance  with  the  terms  and
conditions set forth herein. This Policy is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 10D of the Exchange Act (as defined below)
and Section 303A.14 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “Listing Rule”).

1.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Definitions. For the purposes of this Policy, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below.

“Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or any successor committee thereof.

“Covered  Compensation”  means  any  Incentive-based  Compensation  “received”  by  a  Covered  Executive  during  the  applicable
Recoupment Period; provided that:

(i)

(ii)

Such Covered Compensation was received by such Covered Executive: (A) after the Effective Date, (B) after he or she
commenced  service  as  an  Executive  Officer,  and  (C)  while  the  Company  had  a  class  of  securities  publicly  listed  on  a
United States national securities exchange; and

Such  Covered  Executive  served  as  an  Executive  Officer  at  any  time  during  the  performance  period  applicable  to  such
Incentive-based Compensation.

For purposes of this Policy, Incentive-based Compensation is “received” by a Covered Executive during the fiscal period in which
the  Financial  Reporting  Measure  applicable  to  such  Incentive-based  Compensation  (or  portion  thereof)  is  attained,  even  if  the
payment or grant of such Incentive-based Compensation is made thereafter.

“Covered Executive” means any current or former Executive Officer.

“Effective Date” means the date on which Listing Rule becomes effective.

“Exchange Act” means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Executive  Officer”  means,  with  respect  to  the  Company,  (i)  its  chief  executive  officer,  (ii)  its  chief  financial  officer,  (iii)  its
principal  accounting  officer  or  if  there  is  no  accounting  officer,  its  controller,  (iv)  its  chief  people  officer,  (v)  its  chief  technical
officer, (vi) its chief operational officer, (vii) its chief exploration officer and (viii) its chief strategy, sustainability and legal officer,
or any other officer or person that succeeds any of the above or that perform policy-making functions for the Company or otherwise
meet the definition of “executive officer” under the Listing Rule. Policy-making function is not intended to include policy-making
functions  that  are  not  significant.  The  determination  as  to  an  individual’s  status  as  an  Executive  Officer  shall  be  made  by  the
Committee and such determination shall be final, conclusive, and binding on such individual and all other interested persons.

Only  for  the  purposes  of  this  Policy,  the  principal  accounting  officer  or  if  there  is  no  accounting  officer,  its  controller,  shall  be
considered as Executive Officers.

(g)

“Financial  Reporting  Measure”  means  any:  (i)  measure  that  is  determined  and  presented  in  accordance  with  the  accounting
principles used in preparing the Company’s financial statements, (ii) stock price measure, or (iii) total shareholder return measure
(and  any  measures  that  are  derived  wholly  or  in  part  from  any  measure  referenced  in  clause  (i),  (ii)  or  (iii)  above).  For  the
avoidance of doubt, any such measure does not need to be presented within the Company’s financial statements or included in a
filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to constitute a Financial Reporting Measure.

(h)

“Financial  Restatement”  means  a  restatement  of  the  Company’s  financial  statements  due  to  the  Company’s  material
noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. federal securities laws that is required in order to correct:

(i)

(ii)

an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements; or

an  error  that  would  result  in  a  material  misstatement  if  (A)  the  error  was  corrected  in  the  current  period,  or  (B)  left
uncorrected in the current period.

For  purposes  of  this  Policy,  a  Financial  Restatement  shall  not  be  deemed  to  occur  in  the  event  of  a  revision  of  the  Company’s
financial  statements  due  to  an  out-of-period  adjustment  (i.e.,  when  the  error  is  immaterial  to  the  previously  issued  financial
statements and the correction of the error is also immaterial to the current period), or a retrospective (1) application of a change in
accounting  principles;  (2)  revision  to  reportable  segment  information  due  to  a  change  in  the  structure  of  the  Company’s  internal
organization;  (3)  reclassification  due  to  a  discontinued  operation;  (4)  application  of  a  change  in  reporting  entity,  such  as  from  a
reorganization  of  entities  under  common  control;  (5)  revision  for  stock  splits  (share  subdivisions),  reverse  stock  splits  (share
consolidations),  stock  dividends  (bonus  issues)  or  other  changes  in  capital  structure;  or  (6)  adjustment  to  provisional  amounts  in
connection with a prior business combination.

“Incentive-based Compensation” means (i) awards under the Annual Long Term Incentive Program, (ii) awards under the Annual
Performance Cash Bonus, (iii) benefits under the Executive Termination and Change in Control Benefits Plan and (iv) any other
compensation  (including,  for  the  avoidance  of  doubt,  any  cash  or  equity  or  equity-based  compensation,  whether  deferred  or
current), in each case that is granted, earned and/or vested based wholly or in part upon the achievement of a Financial Reporting
Measure. For purposes of this Policy, “Incentive-based Compensation” shall also be deemed to include any amounts which were
determined based on (or were otherwise calculated by reference to) Incentive-based Compensation (including, without limitation,
any  amounts  under  any  long-term  disability,  life  insurance  or  supplemental  retirement  or  severance  plan  or  agreement  or  any
notional account that is based on Incentive-based Compensation, as well as any earnings accrued thereon).

“NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange, or any successor thereof.

“Recoupment  Period”  means  the  three  fiscal  years  completed  immediately  preceding  the  date  of  any  applicable  Recoupment
Trigger Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Recoupment Period additionally includes any transition period (that results from a
change in the Company’s fiscal year) within or immediately following those three completed fiscal years, provided that a transition
period  between  the  last  day  of  the  Company’s  previous  fiscal  year  end  and  the  first  day  of  its  new  fiscal  year  that  comprises  a
period of nine (9) to twelve (12) months would be deemed a completed fiscal year.

“Recoupment  Trigger  Date”  means  the  earlier  of:  (i)  the  date  that  the  Board  (or  a  committee  thereof  or  the  officer(s)  of  the
Company authorized to take such action if Board action is not required) concludes, or reasonably should have concluded, that the
Company is required to prepare a Financial

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

2

2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Restatement,  and  (ii)  the  date  on  which  a  court,  regulator  or  other  legally  authorized  body  directs  the  Company  to  prepare  a
Financial Restatement.

Recoupment of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.

In  the  event  of  a  Financial  Restatement,  if  the  amount  of  any  Covered  Compensation  received  by  a  Covered  Executive  (the
“Awarded Compensation”) exceeds the amount of such Covered Compensation that would have otherwise been received by such
Covered  Executive  if  calculated  based  on  the  Financial  Restatement  (the  “Adjusted  Compensation”),  the  Company  shall
reasonably promptly recover from such Covered Executive an amount equal to the excess of the Awarded Compensation over the
Adjusted Compensation, each calculated on a pre-tax basis (such excess amount, the “Erroneously Awarded Compensation”).

If: (i) the Financial Reporting Measure applicable to the relevant Covered Compensation is stock price or total shareholder return
(or  any  measure  derived  wholly  or  in  part  from  either  of  such  measures),  and  (ii)  the  amount  of  Erroneously  Awarded
Compensation  is  not  subject  to  mathematical  recalculation  directly  from  the  information  in  the  Financial  Restatement,  then  the
amount  of  Erroneously  Awarded  Compensation  shall  be  determined  (on  a  pre-tax  basis)  based  on  the  Company’s  reasonable
estimate  of  the  effect  of  the  Financial  Restatement  on  the  Company’s  stock  price  or  total  shareholder  return  (or  the  derivative
measure thereof) upon which such Covered Compensation was received.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Company’s obligation to recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation is not dependent on: (i) if or
when the restated financial statements are filed; or (ii) any fault of any Covered Executive for the accounting errors or other actions
leading to a Financial Restatement.

Notwithstanding  anything  to  the  contrary  in  Sections  2 (a)  through   (c)  hereof,  the  Company  shall  not  be  required  to  recover  any
Erroneously  Awarded  Compensation  if  both  (x)  the  conditions  set  forth  in  either  of  the  following  clauses  (i),  (ii),  or  (iii)  are
satisfied, and (y) the Committee (or a majority of the independent directors serving on the Board) has determined that recovery of
the Erroneously Awarded Compensation would be impracticable:

(i)

(ii)

the direct expense paid to a third party to assist in enforcing the recovery of the Erroneously Awarded Compensation under
this Policy would exceed the amount of such Erroneously Awarded Compensation to be recovered; provided that, before
concluding that it would be impracticable to recover any amount of Erroneously Awarded Compensation pursuant to this
Section  2 (d) (i),  the  Company  shall  have  first  made  a  reasonable  attempt  to  recover  such  Erroneously  Awarded
Compensation, document such reasonable attempt(s) to make such recovery and provide that documentation to the NYSE;

recovery of the Erroneously Awarded Compensation would violate Bermuda law to the extent such law was adopted prior
to  November  28,  2022  (provided  that,  before  concluding  that  it  would  be  impracticable  to  recover  any  amount  of
Erroneously Awarded Compensation pursuant to this Section 2 (d) (ii)), the Company shall have first obtained an opinion of
home country counsel of Bermuda, that is acceptable to the NYSE, that recovery would result in such a violation, and the
Company must provide such opinion to the NYSE; or

(iii)

recovery of the Erroneously Awarded Compensation would likely cause an otherwise tax-qualified retirement plan, under
which benefits are broadly available to employees of the Company, to fail to meet the requirements of Sections 401(a)(13)
or 411(a) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

(e)

The Company shall not indemnify any Covered Executive, directly or indirectly, for any losses that such Covered Executive may
incur in connection with the recovery of Erroneously Awarded

3

(f)

3.

4.

5.

6.

Compensation pursuant to this Policy, including through the payment of insurance premiums or gross-up payments.

The  Committee  shall  determine,  in  its  sole  discretion,  the  manner  and  timing  in  which  any  Erroneously Awarded  Compensation
shall  be  recovered  from  a  Covered  Executive  in  accordance  with  applicable  law,  including,  without  limitation,  by  (i)  requiring
reimbursement  of  Covered  Compensation  previously  paid  in  cash;  (ii)  seeking  recovery  of  any  gain  realized  on  the  vesting,
exercise,  settlement,  sale,  transfer  or  other  disposition  of  any  equity  or  equity-based  awards;  (iii)  offsetting  the  Erroneously
Awarded  Compensation  amount  from  any  compensation  otherwise  owed  by  the  Company  or  any  of  its  affiliates  to  the  Covered
Executive; (iv) cancelling outstanding vested or unvested equity or equity-based awards; and/or (v) taking any other remedial and
recovery action permitted by applicable law. For the avoidance of doubt, except as set forth in Section 2(d), in no event may the
Company  accept  an  amount  that  is  less  than  the  amount  of  Erroneously  Awarded  Compensation;  provided  that,  to  the  extent
necessary  to  avoid  any  adverse  tax  consequences  to  the  Covered  Executive  pursuant  to  Section  409A  of  the  Code,  any  offsets
against amounts under any nonqualified deferred compensation plans (as defined under Section 409A of the Code) shall be made in
compliance with Section 409A of the Code.

Administration. This Policy shall be administered by the Committee. All decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and
binding  upon  the  Company  and  the  Covered  Executives,  their  beneficiaries,  executors,  administrators  and  any  other  legal
representative. The Committee shall have full power and authority to: (i) administer and interpret this Policy; (ii) correct any defect,
supply  any  omission  and  reconcile  any  inconsistency  in  this  Policy;  and  (iii)  make  any  other  determination  and  take  any  other
action  that  the  Committee  deems  necessary  or  desirable  for  the  administration  of  this  Policy  and  to  comply  with  applicable  law
(including  Section  10D  of  the  Exchange  Act)  and  applicable  stock  market  or  exchange  rules  and  regulations.  Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, to the extent permitted by Section 10D of the Exchange Act and Section 303A.14 of the
NYSE Listed Company Manual, the Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, administer this Policy in
the same manner as the Committee.

Amendment/Termination. Subject to Section 10D of the Exchange Act and Section 303A.14 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual,
this Policy may be amended or terminated by the Committee at any time. To the extent that any applicable law, or stock market or
exchange  rules  or  regulations  require  recovery  of  Erroneously  Awarded  Compensation  in  circumstances  in  addition  to  those
specified  herein,  nothing  in  this  Policy  shall  be  deemed  to  limit  or  restrict  the  right  or  obligation  of  the  Company  to  recover
Erroneously  Awarded  Compensation  to  the  fullest  extent  required  by  such  applicable  law,  stock  market  or  exchange  rules  and
regulations. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, this Policy shall no longer be effective from and after the date that the
Company no longer has a class of securities publicly listed on a United States national securities exchange.

Interpretation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this Policy is intended to comply with the requirements of Section
10D  of  the  Exchange  Act  and  Section  303A.14  of  the  NYSE  Listed  Company  Manual  (and  any  applicable  regulations,
administrative interpretations or stock market or exchange rules and regulations adopted in connection therewith). The provisions
of this Policy shall be interpreted in a manner that satisfies such requirements and this Policy shall be operated accordingly. If any
provision  of  this  Policy  would  otherwise  frustrate  or  conflict  with  this  intent,  the  provision  shall  be  interpreted  and  deemed
amended to avoid such conflict.

Other Compensation Clawback/Recoupment Rights. Any right of recoupment under this Policy is in addition to, and not in lieu of,
any other remedies, rights or requirements with respect to the clawback or recoupment of any compensation that may be available
to the Company pursuant to the terms of any other recoupment or clawback policy of the Company (or any of its affiliates) that may
be in effect from time to time, any provisions in any employment agreement, offer letter, equity plan, equity award agreement or
similar plan or agreement, and any other legal remedies available to the Company, as

4

7.

8.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

well  as  applicable  law,  stock  market  or  exchange  rules,  listing  standards  or  regulations;  provided,  however,  that  any  amounts
recouped  or  clawed  back  under  any  other  policy  that  would  be  recoupable  under  this  Policy  shall  count  toward  any  required
clawback or recoupment under this Policy and vice versa.

Exempt  Compensation.  Notwithstanding  anything  to  the  contrary  herein,  the  Company  has  no  obligation  to  seek  recoupment  of
amounts paid to a Covered Executive which are granted, vested or earned based solely upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of
nonfinancial  events.  Such  exempt  compensation  includes,  without  limitation,  base  salary,  time-vesting  awards,  compensation
awarded on the basis of the achievement of metrics that are not Financial Reporting Measures or compensation awarded solely at
the discretion of the Committee or the Board, provided that such amounts are in no way contingent on, and were not in any way
granted on the basis of, the achievement of any Financial Reporting Measure.

Miscellaneous.

Any  applicable  award  agreement  or  other  document  setting  forth  the  terms  and  conditions  of  any  compensation  covered  by  this
Policy shall be deemed to include the restrictions imposed herein and incorporate this Policy by reference and, in the event of any
inconsistency,  the  terms  of  this  Policy  will  govern.  For  the  avoidance  of  doubt,  this  Policy  applies  to  all  compensation  that  is
received on or after the Effective Date, regardless of the date on which the award agreement or other document setting forth the
terms and conditions of the Covered Executive’s compensation became effective or was first granted or awarded, including, without
limitation,  compensation  received  under  the  GeoPark  Limited  2018  Equity  Incentive  Plan  with  registration  No.  333-228763  and
filed with the SEC on December 12, 2018 and its related programs and any successor plan.

This Policy shall be binding and enforceable against all Covered Executives and their beneficiaries, heirs, executors, administrators
or other legal representatives.

All issues concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Policy and all related documents, including,
without limitation, any employment agreement, offer letter, equity award agreement or similar agreement, shall be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law rules
or  provisions  (whether  of  the  State  of  New York  or  any  other  jurisdiction)  that  would  cause  the  application  of  the  laws  of  any
jurisdiction other than the State of New York.

The  Covered  Executives,  their  beneficiaries,  executors,  administrators  and  any  other  legal  representative  and  the  Company  shall
initially attempt to resolve all claims, disputes or controversies arising under, out of or in connection with this Policy by conducting
good  faith  negotiations  amongst  themselves. To  ensure  the  timely  and  economical  resolution  of  disputes  that  arise  in  connection
with  this  Policy,  any  controversy  or  claim  arising  out  of  or  relating  to  this  Policy  shall  be  settled  by  binding  and  confidential
arbitration before a single arbitrator administered by Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services under its Employment Arbitration
Rules & Procedures taking place in the State of New York, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in
any court having jurisdiction thereof. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Covered Executives, their beneficiaries, executors,
administrators and any other legal representative and the Company, shall waive (and shall hereby be deemed to have waived): (1)
the  right  to  resolve  any  such  dispute  through  a  trial  by  jury  or  judge  or  administrative  proceeding;  and  (2)  any  objection  to
arbitration taking place in the State of New York.

(e)

If any provision of this Policy is determined to be unenforceable or invalid under any applicable law, such provision will be applied
to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law and shall automatically be deemed amended in a manner consistent with its
objectives to the extent necessary to conform to any limitations required under applicable law.

5

Exhibit 99.1

DeGolyer and MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

March 1, 2024

GeoPark Limited
Calle 94 N° 11-30, 8° floor
Bogotá, Colombia

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to your request, this report of third party presents an independent evaluation, as of December 31, 2023, of the extent of the
estimated  net  proved  oil,  condensate,  and  gas  reserves  of  certain  properties  in  Brazil,  Chile,  Colombia,  and  Ecuador  in  which  GeoPark
Limited (GeoPark) has represented it holds an interest. This evaluation was completed on March 1, 2024. GeoPark has represented that these
properties  account  for  100  percent  on  a  net  equivalent  barrel  basis  of  GeoPark’s  net  proved  reserves  as  of  December  31,  2023.  The  net
proved reserves estimates have been prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4–10(a) (1)–(32) of Regulation S–X of
the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (SEC). This  report  was  prepared  in  accordance  with  guidelines  specified  in  Item
1202 (a)(8) of Regulation S–K and is to be used for inclusion in certain SEC filings by GeoPark.

Reserves  estimates  included  herein  are  expressed  as  net  reserves.  Gross  reserves  are  defined  as  the  total  estimated  petroleum
remaining  to  be  produced  from  these  properties  after  December  31,  2023.  Net  reserves  are  defined  as  that  portion  of  the  gross  reserves
attributable to the interests held by GeoPark after deducting all interests held by others, including royalties paid in kind.

Estimates of reserves should be regarded only as estimates that may change as further production history and additional information
become available. Not only are such estimates based on that information which is currently available, but such estimates are also subject to
the uncertainties inherent in the application of judgmental factors in interpreting such information.

Information  used  in  this  evaluation  was  obtained  from  GeoPark.  In  the  preparation  of  this  report  we  have  relied,  without
independent  verification,  upon  such  information  furnished  by  GeoPark  with  respect  to  the  property  interests  being  evaluated,  production
from such properties, current costs of operation and development, current prices for production, agreements relating to current and future
operations and sale of production, and various other information and data that were accepted as represented. A field examination was not
considered necessary for the purposes of this report.

Definition of Reserves

Petroleum  reserves  included  in  this  report  are  classified  as  proved.  Only  proved  reserves  have  been  evaluated  for  this  report.
Reserves classifications used in this report are in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4–10(a) (1)–(32) of Regulation S–X of
the SEC. Reserves are judged to be economically producible in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions and assuming continuation of current regulatory practices using conventional production methods and equipment. In the analyses
of  production-decline  curves,  reserves  were  estimated  only  to  the  limit  of  economic  rates  of  production  under  existing  economic  and
operating conditions using prices and costs consistent with the effective date of this report, including consideration of changes in existing
prices  provided  only  by  contractual  arrangements  but  not  including  escalations  based  upon  future  conditions. The  petroleum  reserves  are
classified as follows:

Proved oil and gas reserves – Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and
engineering  data,  can  be  estimated  with  reasonable  certainty  to  be  economically  producible—from  a  given  date  forward,  from
known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at
which  contracts  providing  the  right  to  operate  expire,  unless  evidence  indicates  that  renewal  is  reasonably  certain,  regardless  of
whether  deterministic  or  probabilistic  methods  are  used  for  the  estimation.  The  project  to  extract  the  hydrocarbons  must  have
commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes: (A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if
any, and (B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it
and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

(ii)  In  the  absence  of  data  on  fluid  contacts,  proved  quantities  in  a  reservoir  are  limited  by  the  lowest  known  hydrocarbons
(LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a
lower contact with reasonable certainty.

(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists
for  an  associated  gas  cap,  proved  oil  reserves  may  be  assigned  in  the  structurally  higher  portions  of  the  reservoir  only  if
geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not
limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when: (A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of
the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the
reservoir  or  an  analogous  reservoir,  or  other  evidence  using  reliable  technology  establishes  the  reasonable  certainty  of  the
engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and (B) The project has been approved for development by
all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

(v)  Existing  economic  conditions  include  prices  and  costs  at  which  economic  producibility  from  a  reservoir  is  to  be
determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by
the  report,  determined  as  an  unweighted  arithmetic  average  of  the  first-day-of-the-month  price  for  each  month  within  such
period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

Developed oil and gas reserves – Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is
relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is
by means not involving a well.

Undeveloped oil and gas reserves – Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered
from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

(i)  Reserves  on  undrilled  acreage  shall  be  limited  to  those  directly  offsetting  development  spacing  areas  that  are  reasonably
certain  of  production  when  drilled,  unless  evidence  using  reliable  technology  exists  that  establishes  reasonable  certainty  of
economic producibility at greater distances.

(ii)  Undrilled  locations  can  be  classified  as  having  undeveloped  reserves  only  if  a  development  plan  has  been  adopted
indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of
fluid  injection  or  other  improved  recovery  technique  is  contemplated,  unless  such  techniques  have  been  proved  effective  by
actual  projects  in  the  same  reservoir  or  an  analogous  reservoir,  as  defined  in  [section  210.4–10  (a)  Definitions],  or  by  other
evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

3

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

Methodology and Procedures

Estimates  of  reserves  were  prepared  by  the  use  of  appropriate  geologic,  petroleum  engineering,  and  evaluation  principles  and
techniques that are in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4–10(a)(1)–(32) of Regulation S–X of the SEC and with practices
generally recognized by the petroleum industry as presented in the publication of the Society of Petroleum Engineers entitled “Standards
Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information (revised June 2019) Approved by the SPE Board on 25 June
2019.” The method or combination of methods used in the analysis of each reservoir was tempered by experience with similar reservoirs,
stage of development, quality and completeness of basic data, and production history.

Based  on  the  current  stage  of  field  development,  production  performance,  the  development  plans  provided  by  GeoPark,  and
analyses  of  areas  offsetting  existing  wells  with  test  or  production  data,  reserves  were  classified  as  proved.  The  undeveloped  reserves
estimates were based on opportunities identified in the plan of development provided by GeoPark.

GeoPark has represented that its senior management is committed to the development plan provided by GeoPark and that GeoPark
has the financial capability to execute the development plan, including the drilling and completion of wells and the installation of equipment
and facilities.

The volumetric method was used to estimate the original oil in place (OOIP) and original gas in place (OGIP). Structure maps were
prepared  to  delineate  each  reservoir,  and  isopach  maps  were  constructed  to  estimate  reservoir  volume.  Electrical  logs,  radioactivity  logs,
core analyses, and other available data were used to prepare these maps as well as to estimate representative values for porosity and water
saturation. When adequate data were available and when circumstances justified, material-balance methods were used to estimate OOIP or
OGIP.

Estimates of ultimate recovery were obtained after applying recovery factors to OOIP and OGIP. These recovery factors were based
on consideration of the type of energy inherent in the reservoirs, analyses of the petroleum, the structural positions of the properties, and the
production histories. When applicable, material balance and other engineering methods were used to estimate recovery factors based on an
analysis of reservoir performance, including production rate, reservoir pressure, and reservoir fluid properties.

For depletion-type reservoirs or those whose performance disclosed a reliable decline in producing-rate trends or other diagnostic

characteristics, reserves were estimated by the application of appropriate decline curves or other performance relationships.

In  certain  cases,  reserves  were  estimated  by  incorporating  elements  of  analogy  with  similar  wells  or  reservoirs  for  which  more

complete data were available.

In the evaluation of undeveloped reserves, type-well analysis was performed using well data from analogous reservoirs for which

more complete historical performance data were available.

For  cases  where  history-matched  dynamic  models  were  available  and  applicable,  model  results  were  used  to  estimate  recovery

factors and reserves production forecasts.

The reserves estimates contained herein were limited to the economic limit, as defined under the Definition of Reserves heading of

this report, or to the end of the concession, whichever occurs first.

Data  provided  by  GeoPark  from  wells  drilled  through  December  31,  2023,  and  made  available  for  this  evaluation  were  used  to
prepare the reserves estimates herein. These reserves estimates were based on consideration of monthly production data available for certain
properties only through November 2023. Estimated cumulative production, as of December 31, 2023, was deducted from the estimated gross
ultimate recovery to estimate gross reserves. This required that production be estimated for up to 1 month.

Oil and condensate reserves estimated herein are to be recovered by normal field separation. Oil reserves include fuel oil. Fuel oil is
defined as that portion of the oil consumed in field operations. Oil and condensate reserves included in this report are expressed in thousands
of barrels (103bbl). In these estimates, 1 barrel equals 42 United States gallons. For reporting purposes, oil and condensate reserves have
been estimated separately and are presented herein as a summed quantity.

4

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

Gas quantities estimated herein are expressed as sales gas. Sales gas is defined as the total gas to be produced from the reservoirs,
measured  at  the  point  of  delivery,  after  reduction  for  fuel  usage,  flare,  and  shrinkage  resulting  from  field  separation  and  processing.  Gas
reserves estimated herein are reported as sales gas. Gas quantities are expressed at a temperature base of zero degrees Celsius (°C) and at a
pressure  base  of  1  kilogram  per  square  centimeter  (kg/cm2)  for  properties  located  in  Chile  and  at  a  temperature  base  of  15.5°C  and  at  a
pressure base of 1 kg/cm2 for properties located in other countries. Gas quantities included in this report are expressed in millions of cubic
feet (106ft3).

Gas  quantities  are  identified  by  the  type  of  reservoir  from  which  the  gas  will  be  produced.  Nonassociated  gas  is  gas  at  initial
reservoir conditions with no oil present in the reservoir. Associated gas is both gas-cap gas and solution gas. Gas-cap gas is gas at initial
reservoir  conditions  and  is  in  communication  with  an  underlying  oil  zone.  Solution  gas  is  gas  dissolved  in  crude  oil  at  initial  reservoir
conditions. Gas quantities reported herein are both nonassociated gas and associated gas.

At the request of GeoPark, sales gas reserves estimated herein were converted to oil equivalent using an energy equivalent factor of

6,000 cubic feet of gas per 1 barrel of oil equivalent.

Primary Economic Assumptions

This report has been prepared using initial prices, expenses, and costs provided by GeoPark in United States dollars (U.S.$). Future
prices  were  estimated  using  guidelines  established  by  the  SEC  and  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (FASB).  The  following
economic assumptions were used for estimating the reserves reported herein:

Oil and Condensate Prices

GeoPark  has  represented  that  the  oil  and  condensate  prices  were  based  on  a  reference  price,  calculated  as  the  unweighted
arithmetic  average  of  the  first-day-of-the-month  price  for  each  month  within  the  12-month  period  prior  to  the  end  of  the
reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual agreements. GeoPark supplied differentials to a Brent reference price
of  U.S.$82.09  per  barrel  and  the  prices  were  held  constant  thereafter.  For  the  Manati  field  in  Brazil,  the  volume-weighted
average adjusted product price attributable to the estimated proved reserves was U.S.$70.68 per barrel of condensate. For the
fields located in Chile, the volume-weighted average adjusted product price attributable to the estimated proved reserves was
U.S.$68.04 per barrel of oil and condensate. For the fields located in Colombia, the volume-weighted average adjusted product
price  attributable  to  the  estimated  proved  reserves  was  U.S.$68.73  per  barrel  of  oil.  For  the  fields  located  in  Ecuador,  the
volume-weighted average adjusted product price attributable to the estimated proved reserves was U.S.$61.27 per barrel of oil.

Gas Prices

GeoPark  has  represented  that  the  gas  prices  are  defined  by  contractual  agreements  and  their  expected  extensions,  which  are
based on specific market conditions. The volume-weighted average adjusted product price attributable to the estimated proved
reserves for the Manati field in Brazil was U.S.$6.65 per thousand cubic feet (103ft3) of gas. The volume-weighted average
adjusted product price attributable to the estimated proved reserves for the fields located in Chile was U.S.$3.39 per 103ft3 of
gas. The volume-weighted average adjusted product price attributable to the estimated proved reserves for the fields located in
Colombia was U.S.$6.00 per 103ft3 of gas.

5

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

Operating Expenses, Capital Costs, and Abandonment Costs

Estimates of operating expenses and capital costs, provided by GeoPark and based on existing economic conditions, were held
constant for the lives of the properties. This information included historical costs as well as operating expense and capital cost
estimates for future development. In certain cases, future expenditures, either higher or lower than current expenditures, may
have  been  used  because  of  anticipated  changes  in  operating  conditions,  but  no  general  escalation  that  might  result  from
inflation was applied. Abandonment costs, which are those costs associated with the removal of equipment, plugging of wells,
and reclamation and restoration associated with the abandonment, were provided by GeoPark for each field or block and were
included in the year following cessation of production, except in Brazil, where abandonment costs are allocated annually into
an abandonment fund. Abandonment costs were not escalated. Operating expenses, capital costs, and abandonment costs were
considered in determining the economic viability of the undeveloped reserves estimated herein.

In our opinion, the information relating to estimated proved reserves of oil, condensate, and gas contained in this report has been
prepared in accordance with Paragraphs 932-235-50-4, 932-235-50-6, 932-235-50-7, and 932-235-50-9 of the Accounting Standards Update
932-235-50, Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures (January 2010) of the FASB
and Rules 4–10(a)(1)–(32) of Regulation S–X and Rules 302(b), 1201, 1202(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), (8), and 1203(a) of Regulation S–K of the
SEC; provided, however, that estimates of proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves are not presented at the beginning of the year.

To the extent the above-enumerated rules, regulations, and statements require determinations of an accounting or legal nature, we,

as engineers, are necessarily unable to express an opinion as to whether the above-described information is in accordance therewith or
sufficient therefor.

6

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

Summary of Conclusions

DeGolyer and MacNaughton has performed an independent evaluation of the extent of the estimated net proved oil, condensate,
and  gas  reserves  of  certain  properties  in  which  GeoPark  has  represented  it  holds  an  interest.  The  estimated  net  proved  reserves,  as  of
December 31, 2023, of the properties evaluated herein were based on the definition of proved reserves of the SEC and are summarized as
follows, expressed in thousands of barrels (103bbl), millions of cubic feet (106ft3), and thousands of barrels of oil equivalent (103boe):

Brazil

Proved Developed
Proved Undeveloped

Total Proved

Chile

Proved Developed
Proved Undeveloped

Total Proved

Colombia

Proved Developed
Proved Undeveloped

Total Proved

Ecuador

Proved Developed
Proved Undeveloped

Total Proved

Grand Total 
Proved Developed
Proved Undeveloped

Total Proved

Estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton 
Net Proved Reserves 
as of 
December 31, 2023

Oil and
Condensate
(103bbl)

Sales Gas
(106ft3)

Oil Equivalent
(103boe)

28 
0 

28 

619 
479 

8,888 
0 

8,888 

9,956 
855 

1,098 

10,811 

43,120 
16,225 

59,345 

1,017 
1,278 

2,295 

1,075 
0 

1,075 

0 
0 

0 

44,784 
17,982 

19,919 
855 

1,509 
0 

1,509 

2,278 
622 

2,900 

43,299 
16,225 

59,524 

1,017 
1,278 

2,295 

48,103 
18,125 

62,766 

20,774 

66,228 

Notes: 1. Sales gas reserves estimated herein were converted to oil equivalent using an energy equivalent factor of 6,000 cubic feet of gas

per 1 barrel of oil equivalent.

              2. Oil reserves include fuel oil quantities associated with the Platanillo field in Colombia. Fuel oil quantities were estimated to be 

132 103bbl of the proved developed reserves and 158 103bbl of the total proved reserves.

7

 
    
    
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DeGolyer and MacNaughton

While the oil and gas industry may be subject to regulatory changes from time to time that could affect an industry participant’s
ability to recover its reserves, we are not aware of any such governmental actions which would restrict the recovery of the December 31,
2023, estimated reserves.

DeGolyer and MacNaughton is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting
services throughout the world since 1936. DeGolyer and MacNaughton does not have any financial interest, including stock ownership, in
GeoPark. Our fees were not contingent on the results of our evaluation. This report has been prepared at the request of GeoPark. DeGolyer
and MacNaughton has used all assumptions, data, procedures, and methods that it considers necessary and appropriate to prepare this report.

Submitted,

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

/s/ Peter Laudon
Peter Laudon, P.E., P.G.
Vice President
DeGolyer and MacNaughton

8

[SEAL]

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DeGolyer and MacNaughton

CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION

I, Peter Laudon, Petroleum Engineer with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 800 East, Dallas, Texas, 75244

U.S.A., hereby certify:

1. That I am a Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which firm did prepare the report of third party addressed to GeoPark

dated March 1, 2024, and that I, as Vice President, was responsible for the preparation of this report of third party.

2. That I attended the University of Kansas, and that I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology in the year 1988, and
that I attended the University of Missouri at Rolla, and that I graduated with both a Master of Science degree in Geology in the year
1992 and a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering in the year 1995; that I am a Licensed Professional Geologist and
that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas; that I am a member of the American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers, the Society of Professional Well
Log Analysts, and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists; and that I have in excess of 29 years of experience in oil and
gas reservoir studies and evaluations.

[SEAL]

/s/ Peter Laudon
Peter Laudon, P.E., P.G.
Vice President
DeGolyer and MacNaughton

9