Quarterlytics / Real Estate / REIT - Office / Great Portland Estates plc

Great Portland Estates plc

gporgpeaf · OTC Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker gporgpeaf
Exchange OTC
Sector Real Estate
Industry REIT - Office
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Great Portland Estates plc
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
We unlock potential,  
creating sustainable  
space for London to thrive
Great Portland Estates plc  
Annual Report and Accounts 2024

Governance
90
Overview
91
Introduction from the Chair
94
The Board
96
Leadership and purpose
100
Engaging with our investors
102
Engaging with our employees
104
Board consideration of stakeholder 
interests and s.172(1) matters
108
Division of responsibilities
110
Composition, succession 
and evaluation
116
Audit, risks and internal controls
124
Directors’ remuneration report
144
Report of the Directors
146
Directors’ responsibilities statement
Strategic Report – Overview
01
Statement from the Chair
02
An evolving strategy…
03
…underpinned by our values and 
commitment to sustainability
04
Creating great spaces 
in central London
06
Putting our customers first
12
How we create value
14
Our near-term strategic priorities
16
Our key performance indicators
Strategic Report – Annual review
19
Statement from the Chief Executive
21
Our markets
23
Our development activities 
and capex programme
26
Our leasing and Flex activities
28
Our investment activities
30
Our financial results
34
Our portfolio
37
Sustainability
63
Our people and culture
69
Our stakeholder relationships
72
Engaging with our stakeholders
74
Our approach to risk
Financial statements
148
Group income statement
148
Group statement of 
comprehensive income
149
Group balance sheet
150
Group statement of cash flows
151
Group statement of changes 
in equity
152
Notes forming part of the 
Group financial statements
179
Independent auditors’ report
187
Company balance sheet
188
Company statement of changes 
in equity
189
Notes forming part of the 
Company financial statements
Other information (unaudited)
194
Five-year record
195
Our properties and customers
197
Portfolio statistics
198
Glossary
201
Shareholders’ information
203
Financial calendar
In this report
Cover image: Entrance to Woolyard, SE1.
We believe in the power of people  
and partnerships to create exceptional, 
sustainable places in London that deliver 
for our customers and drive consistent 
growth and performance for our investors.
Our spaces are designed and managed 
to create a sustainable legacy for our 
great city. One that inspires, enriches and 
enhances the lives of our customers and 
the communities that surround them.
See our website 
www.gpe.co.uk
For more information

Statement from the Chair
Committed to London, our true global city
Whilst the macro-economic uncertainty and higher 
interest rates impacted our property valuation 
and financial performance, we delivered another 
strong operating performance as we continue 
to evolve our strategy. Moreover, with the return 
of the property cycle, and both interest rates 
and property yields now likely around their peak, 
we are increasingly confident that our activities 
will drive attractive shareholder returns in the 
medium term.
We have maintained our absolute focus on our true 
global city and delivering our purpose: to unlock 
potential, creating sustainable space for London 
to thrive. We are meeting the growing needs of 
our customers, delivering magnetic office spaces 
for their people and communities in amenity rich, 
well connected central London locations.
Operating well in an increasingly supportive market
With the market further bifurcating between the 
best and the rest over the year, we increased our 
commitments to develop more best-in-class HQ 
buildings and create more smaller fitted Flex spaces 
with higher service levels, whilst also adding to 
our portfolio of opportunity through acquisitions. 
Our leasing has remained strong with rents growing 
as supply remains tight, and we expect further 
growth from here.
Strengthening our commitments to net zero
We have strengthened our commitments to 
decarbonise our business, updating our Roadmap 
to Net Zero whilst innovating and embracing 
the circular economy. And with customers at the 
heart of both our activities and our values, we again 
delivered a leading office Net Promoter Score 
and further enhanced our organisational structure. 
Through promoting from within and the targeted 
recruitment of new talent, the Board has ensured 
we have the right team and capabilities to deliver 
our strategic ambitions and to progress our 
diversity and inclusion agenda.
Looking ahead, we are well positioned to capitalise 
on the compelling new investment opportunities 
that are emerging and can look to the future 
with confidence.
Our Strategic Report, on pages 01 to 88, has been 
reviewed and approved by the Board.
On behalf of the Board
Richard Mully
Chair  
22 May 2024
“We are well positioned to capitalise on the compelling 
new investment opportunities that are emerging and  
can look to the future with confidence.”
Richard Mully Chair
Strategic Report – Overview
01
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

An evolving  
strategy…
Our business model
In order to unlock potential, we apply our specialist skills to  
reposition properties to produce high quality, sustainable spaces,  
with high levels of service that our customers demand.
Our near-term priorities
In the near term, our priorities include 
creating exciting sustainable spaces 
for our customers, whether through 
expanding our flexible offerings or 
delivering on our ambitious development 
programme, as well as enhancing our 
portfolio through acquisitions and sales.
See more on our near-term strategic 
priorities on pages 14 and 15
See more on how we create value on pages 12 and 13
Customer First:  
partnering with our 
customers to meet  
their evolving needs
Flex  
spaces 
Smaller fitted  
units, often with 
higher service  
levels
Flex  
Partnerships 
Fully  
Managed 
Fitted 
Ready to Fit
For businesses  
which want to fit out  
the space themselves
Fully furnished,  
well-designed 
workspaces
Fitted space where  
GPE handles all  
day-to-day running  
of the workplace
Delivered by  
desk or room
HQ  
repositioning 
Delivering large, 
best-in-class  
HQ buildings
Two complementary, 
overlapping products
Four core office solutions
See more on HQ  
repositioning on  
page 23 and 24
See more on our leasing  
and Flex activities on  
page 27
Our purpose
We unlock potential, creating  
sustainable space for London to thrive.
Our strategic principles
Our strategy is underpinned  
by a set of clear principles:
100% central London
Reposition properties
Match risk to cycle
Low financial leverage
Disciplined capital management
Sustainability: an imperative
Customer First
Acquire
Operate & manage
Recycle
Reposition
02
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

One year
2024
2023
Portfolio valuation1
£2.33bn
£2.38bn
IFRS NAV & EPRA NTA per share
624p
757p
Loss after tax
£(307.8)m
£(163.9)m
Total Accounting Return (TAR)
(15.9%)
(7.8%)
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
(21.3%)
(27.3%)
As is usual practice in our sector, we use alternative performance  
measures (APMs) to help explain the performance of the business. These  
include quoting a number of measures on a proportionally consolidated 
basis to include joint ventures, as it best describes how we manage the 
portfolio, like-for-like measures and using measures prescribed by EPRA.  
The measures defined by EPRA are designed to enhance transparency 
and comparability across the European real estate sector. Reconciliations  
of APMs are included in note 9 of the financial statements.
1.	 Includes share of joint ventures.
2.	 ERV at 31 March 2023.
Our financial performance
IFRS  
net assets
 £1.6bn
2023: £1.9bn
Customer satisfaction  
(Office NPS Score)
 +30.2
2023: +44.0
EPRA  
Loan to Value1
32.6%
2023: 19.8%
Employee engagement 
index (EEII)
 74%
2023: 84%
New leasing deals 
premium to ERV2
 +9.1%
2023: +3.3%
Vacancy rate1
1.3%
2023: 2.5%
Dividend per share
12.6p
2023: 12.6p
Committed Flex space
503,000  
sq ft
…underpinned by our values and 
commitment to sustainability
See more on our financial results on pages 30 to 33
Our values
Our values define who we are and how we act, and are at the heart of what we do:
Highlights
See more on our people and culture on pages 63 to 68
Our approach to sustainability
Creating sustainable spaces sits at the heart of our purpose. We are:
See more on sustainability on pages 37 to 62
Integrating 
climate resilience  
across our 
business
Decarbonising 
our business to  
become net zero 
by 2040
Putting health 
and wellbeing  
front and centre
Creating a lasting 
positive social 
impact in our 
communities
Strategic Report – Overview
03
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

R I
V
E R
  
  
  
T H
A
M E
S
P I C C A D I L LY
PA R K  L A N E
B A K E R  S T
G L O U C E S T E R  P L
M A R Y L E B O N E  R D
E U S T O N  R D
E U S T O N  R D
T H E O
B A L D S  R D
V I
C T
O R
I A
 E
M B
A N
K M
E N
T
T H E  M A L L
W AT E R L O O  B R I D G E
Y O R K  
R D
S TA M F O R D
W
AT E R L O O  R D
C O N S T I T U T I O N  H I L L
S L O A N E  S T
W H I T
E H A L
L
H O R S
E
 
G
U
A
R D
S
 
R
D
R E G E N T  S T
C H A R I N G  C R O S S  R D
S
H
A F
T E
S B U R Y  A V E
G O W E R  S T
G O O D G E  S T
B R O O K  S T
G R O S V E N O R  S T
G E O R G E  S T
N E W  C A V E N D I S H  S T
W E Y M O U T H  S T
C R A W F O R D  S T
A
L
D
W
Y
C
H
R O B E R T  S T
J U D D  S T
O U T E R  C I R C L E
P O R T L A N D  P L
PA L L  M A L L
                  O X F O R D  S T
N E W  O X F O R D  S T  
 
 
 
H I G H
 H O
L
B
O R N
K I N G S W AY
W O B U R N  P L
E V E R S H O LT  S T
T O T
T E N H A M  C O U R T  R D
H A M P S T E A D  R D
W I G M O R E  S T  
         M O R T I M E R  S T
PA R K  R D
A L B A N Y  S T  
 
 
             G R E AT  P O R T L A N D  S T
G R AY ’ S  I N N  R D
B I R D C A G E  W A L K
W E S T M I N S T E R  B R I D G E
S T R A N D
K I N G
S  
C
R
O
S
S
 
R D
O U T E R  C I R C L E
V I
C T
O
R I
A
 
S
T
G R O S V E
N O
AY L I
S  
R
D
B U C K
I
N
G
H
A M
G
Leicester 
Square
Leicester 
Square
Covent 
Garden
Covent 
Garden
Holborn
Holborn
Chancery Lane
Chancery Lane
Piccadilly
Circus
Piccadilly
Circus
Green
Park
Green
Park
Goodge 
Street
Goodge 
Street
Bond 
Street
Bond 
Street
Marble 
Arch
Marble 
Arch
Hyde Park 
Corner
Hyde Park 
Corner
Oxford
Circus
Oxford
Circus
Regent’s 
Park
Regent’s 
Park
Great 
Portland 
Street
Great 
Portland 
Street
Euston 
Square
Euston 
Square
Euston
Euston
Russell 
Square
Russell 
Square
Waterloo
Waterloo
Westminster
Westminster
Temple
Temple
St James’s
St James’s
Charing 
Cross
Charing 
Cross
Embankment
Embankment
Baker 
Street
Baker 
Street
Warren
Street
Warren
Street
Tottenham 
Court Road
H Y D E  PA R K
H Y D E  PA R K
G R O S V E N O R  
S Q U A R E  G A R D E N
G R O S V E N O R  
S Q U A R E  G A R D E N
C A V E N D I S H  
S Q U A R E
C A V E N D I S H  
S Q U A R E
P O R T M A N
S Q U A R E
P O R T M A N
S Q U A R E
H A N O V E R
S Q U A R E
H A N O V E R
S Q U A R E
R U S S E L L  
S Q U A R E
R U S S E L L  
S Q U A R E
B E D F O R D  
S Q U A R E  
G A R D E N
B E D F O R D  
S Q U A R E  
G A R D E N
L I N C O L N ’ S  
I N N  F I E L D S
L I N C O L N ’ S  
I N N  F I E L D S
I N N E R  T E M P L E  
G A R D E N S
I N N E R  T E M P L E  
G A R D E N S
J U B I L E E  
G A R D E N S
J U B I L E E  
G A R D E N S
B E R K E L E Y  
S Q U A R E
B E R K E L E Y  
S Q U A R E
R E G E N T ’ S  PA R K
R E G E N T ’ S  PA R K
G R E E N  PA R K
G R E E N  PA R K
S T  J A M E S ’ S  
PA R K
S T  J A M E S ’ S  
PA R K
S T  J A M E S ’ S
S Q U A R E
S T  J A M E S ’ S
S Q U A R E
S O H O
S Q U A R E
S O H O
S Q U A R E
M AY FA I R
C O V E N T  
G A R D E N
S O U T H B A N K
H O L B O R N
B L O O M S B U R Y
F I T Z R O V I A
M A R Y L E B O N E
Portfolio valuation1
 £2.3bn
2023: £2.4bn
Rent roll1
 £107.5m
2023: £106.4m
Property sq ft2
 2.7m sq ft
2023: 2.6m sq ft
Our portfolio1
1.	 Including share of joint ventures.
2.	 Includes joint ventures.
Mount  
Royal
183/190  
Tottenham  
Court Road
95/96  
New Bond  
Street
Hanover  
Square
Elm Yard
Wells  
& More
23/24  
Newman  
Street
Walmar  
House
200 & 214 
Gray’s Inn  
Road
103/113  
Regent  
Street
1 Newman  
Street &  
70/88 Oxford 
Street
7/15  
Gresse  
Street
35  
Portman  
Square
Pollen  
House
Kingsland  
House
48/54  
Broadwick  
Street &  
16 Dufour’s  
Place
31/34  
Alfred  
Place
The  
Piccadilly  
Buildings
Elsley  
House
Kent  
House
Orchard  
Court
Carrington  
House
141 
Wardour 
 Street
Soho Square 
Estate
See more  
on page 11
Creating great spaces  
in central London
5%
4%
3%
60%
18%
10%
Ready to fit
Retail
Fully managed
Flex Partnerships
Fitted
Other
04
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

FA
R R
I N
G
D
O
N  R D
C L E
R
K
E
N
W E
L
L
 
R
D
O L
D  S
T
U P P E
R  T H
A M E
S  S
T
F L
E E T
 S T
F L
E E T
 S T
Q
U
E E N  V I C T O R I A  
S T
C H E A P S I D E
K I N G  W I L L I A M  S T
C I T Y  R
D  
 
       
  M
O
O
R G A
T E
  
L
O
N D
O N  W A L L
T H E  C
U T
U N I O N  S T
D  S T
S O U T H
W A R K  
S T
B E E C H  S T
B U N H I
L
L  
R O
W
N E W G AT E  S T
S T  P
A
U
L
’
S
 
C
H
U
R
C H YA R D
C A N N O N  S T
B L A C K F R I A R S  B R I D G E
B L A C K F R I A R S  R D
S
O U T H W A R K  B R I D G E
L O N D O N  B R I D G E
A
L D
E R S G A
T
E  S T
G O S W E L
L  R D
C I T Y  R D
C H I S W E L L  S T
E A
S
T
 
R
D
W A P P I N G  H I G
H
 
S
T
V A U
G H
A
N  W AY
L E M A N  S T
C
O
M
M
E R C I A
L
 
S
T
G R E AT  E A S T E R N  S T
W H I T E C H A
P E L  R D
A L D G AT E  H I G H  S T
M A N
S E L
L  
R
D
G E  R D
M I N O R I E S
C A B L E  S T
L O W E R  T H A M E S  S
T
B I
S
H
O P
S
G
A
T
E
G R A C E C H U R C H
 S T
T O O L E Y
 
S
T
B E
T H
N A
L  G R E E N  R D
G
O S S
E T  S T
C O L U M B I A  R D
P I T F I E L D  S T
A L I
E  S
T
T H E  H
I G H W
AY
E
 
S
M
I
T
H
F
I
E
L
D
C O R N
H I L L
L E A
D
E
N H A L
L  S T
F
E
N
C
H U
R C
H  S
T
C O M M E R C I A L  R D
C A N N O N  S T  R D
V
A L L A N C E  R D
S Q U I R R E L  S T
S C AT L E R  S T
C H E S H I R E  
S T
T
A
N
N
E R
 S
T
R O
YA L  M I N T  S T
N E W  R D
K I N G S L
A
N
D  R D
H
A C K N E Y  R D
Old
Street
Old
Street
Farringdon
Farringdon
Blackfriars
Blackfriars
St Paul’s
St Paul’s
Bank
Bank
Mansion 
House
Mansion 
House
London
Bridge
London
Bridge
Borough
Borough
Southwark
Southwark
Barbican
Barbican
Moorgate
Moorgate
Tower 
Hill
Tower 
Hill
Fenchurch 
Street
Fenchurch 
Street
Liverpool 
Street
Liverpool 
Street
Aldgate
Aldgate
Aldgate East
Aldgate East
Whitechapel
Whitechapel
Bethnal 
Green
Bethnal 
Green
Shoreditch 
High Street
Shoreditch 
High Street
Monument
Monument
W A P P I N G  
G A R D E N S
W A P P I N G  
G A R D E N S
W E A V E R S  
F I E L D S
W E A V E R S  
F I E L D S
S O U T H W A R K
C L E R K E N W E L L
S H O R E D I T C H
W H I T E C H A P E L
W A P P I N G
 
B E T H N A L  
G R E E N
B A R B I C A N
C I T Y  O F  
L O N D O N
North of Oxford Street
Rest of West End
£870.3m
£849.6m
£306.7m
£213.9m
£90.7m
City
Southwark
Midtown
Value
Locations
Office
Retail
Residential
£1,838.3m
£485.7m
£7.2m
Value
Business mix
100% central London,  
with 24% in our  
HQ development or  
Flex refurbishment  
programme
37%
37%
4%
9%
13%
79%
21%0%
Buildings providing Flex space
North of Oxford Street
Rest of West End
City
Midtown
Southwark
2 Cathedral 
Street 
City  
Tower
Woolyard
New City  
Court
The Hickman
& Challenger 
House
Bramah 
House
2  
Aldermanbury 
Square
6  
St Andrew  
Street
Minerva  
House
See more on 
pages 8 and 9
Strategic Report – Overview
05
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Greater  
choice.
See more on page 07
Trusted  
partners.
See more on page 10
Driving  
innovation.
See more on page 08
Future  
London.
See more on page 11
Putting our 
customers first
We aim to help our customers thrive,  
by designing, creating, managing and  
owning market-leading, sustainable  
workspaces, delivering personal customer 
experiences every single day.
06
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

As customers increasingly demand the very best, sustainable spaces, 
and discount the rest, we are shaping our spaces accordingly. We know 
every business is different, so we aim to provide a choice of premium 
spaces that allow our customers to take the option that best suits 
their business needs.
Across our diverse London portfolio, our customers can choose to take 
office space as Ready to Fit, or delivered flexibly on a Fitted or Fully 
Managed basis, helping to make life easier and hassle free. Whilst our 
spaces are many and varied, they are all of a high quality, as we recognise 
that second best is no longer in demand.
Our leasing success this year demonstrates that this approach is working. 
We signed 66 new leases generating £22.5 million in annual rent. The  
rents achieved were 9.1% ahead of the March 2023 ERV, as our customers  
recognise the value of the quality of space we are delivering. Looking  
ahead, GPE is well-placed to continue this success with a deep pipeline 
of buildings that will ensure we continue to deliver best-in-class spaces 
over the coming years.
See more on pages 26 and 27
Greater  
choice
Strategic Report – Overview
07
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

We are committed to embedding innovative ways of working 
throughout our development process to help benefit the local 
environment, reduce our carbon footprint and have a positive 
impact on the communities in which we work.
At Minerva House, SE1, we are working with our partners Morrisroe 
and Multiplex to create a best-in-class riverside workspace, 
located on the Southbank, right in front of the River Thames. 
Originally constructed in the 1980s, the six-storey building sits 
opposite Southwark Cathedral and Borough Market, an iconic 
location, that is surrounded by public realm.
We aim to retrofit and refurbish the existing building, maintaining 
over 70% of the existing fabric, together with introducing innovative 
ways of working that will further reduce the overall embodied 
carbon impact of the development. As part of our activities, 20 tonnes 
of glass will be salvaged from site and used in the production of 
new glass; this is one of the first schemes in the country to participate 
in this truly circular and innovative process.
Minerva House is also the first private development on the Thames 
to utilise a barge to remove materials from site during the first phase 
of the development. This pioneering approach will reduce the total 
number of heavy goods vehicles coming to site by 65% during the 
deconstruction phase, removing waste from an area with very high 
footfall, as well as reducing noise and air pollution in a congested, 
pedestrian heavy environment. 
See more on page 24
Driving  
innovation
08
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our innovative approach of utilising the river will benefit the 
local community by reducing pollution and vehicle numbers, and 
managing road safety in a congested central London location. 
Strategic Report – Overview
09
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Trusted  
partners
We believe in the power of people and partnerships to 
create exceptional, climate-conscious places that deliver 
for our customers. In order to create space for London 
to thrive, we have a responsibility to ensure that we have 
a long lasting positive impact on the communities in 
which we work.
This year we continued to support our charity partnership 
with XLP by organising a series of charity challenges during 
our inaugural community week. More than 120 GPE team 
members came together to undertake numerous activities, 
including: completing the National Three Peaks challenge 
in 24 hours, trekking 42km along the South Downs way,  
walking a marathon through London’s Royal Parks, 
braving a tandem skydive from 13,000 ft and community 
volunteering. The team successfully raised over £82,000 
and surpassed our initial target of £75,000.
We support XLP because it empowers young people 
from disadvantaged backgrounds to complete their 
education, avoid anti-social behaviour and ultimately 
become independent and confident contributors within 
their communities. Last year, the organisation helped 
4,000 young people and their families. Our partnership 
with XLP is designed to help us reach our shared goal of 
creating social value in London, creating a positive impact 
in the areas where we operate and improving the lives 
of its residents and wider community.
See more on pages 50 and 51
Skye from Newham is one of XLP’s young musicians. She’s now 
working in the music industry and on the charity’s youth board.
10
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our recent acquisition of the Soho Square Estate, W1 represents 
a fantastic opportunity to transform a strategic West End 
freehold site into a new best-in-class headquarters building 
perfectly suited to the demands of the modern customer.
The 0.5 acre site is located at the eastern end of Oxford Street, in a 
area we know well, just 100 metres from the new Tottenham Court 
Road Elizabeth line station. The existing collection of buildings are 
at the end of their economic life and the site benefits from planning 
consent to deliver a brand new building spanning the entirety of 
the site. Ahead of an anticipated start in Q1 2025, we intend to 
improve the building design by adding new area and improving the 
quality of space to further increase its attractiveness to prospective 
customers. Once complete, the building will provide 100,300 sq ft 
of new Grade A offices on Soho Square and prime retail space on 
Oxford Street. The office building will be arranged over basement, 
lower ground, ground and eight upper floors, with multiple private 
terraces and a communal roof terrace and will deliver best-in-class 
sustainability metrics.
The Soho Square Estate is a great addition to a development 
pipeline that is already stacked with future opportunity. Our plans 
will greatly improve the local environment, provide support for 
London’s economy and deliver a lasting sustainable impact 
on London’s future.
See more on pages 24 and 25 
Future  
London
Strategic Report – Overview
11
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

How we create value
In order to unlock potential, we apply our specialist skills to reposition properties to 
produce high quality, sustainable spaces that our customers demand. Our disciplined 
approach to allocating capital shapes our activities, ensuring we operate in tune 
with London’s cyclical property markets to maximise returns.
Our stakeholder relationships
	
– Intense, supportive, customer-focused approach to 
understand customers’ needs. Utilising regular customer 
feedback to create bespoke action plans.
	
– Strong levels of customer satisfaction.
	
– Open relationship with debt and equity providers based 
on clear investment case and transparent disclosure.
	
– Deep relationships with key suppliers (including contractors) 
and joint venture partners.
	
– Positive engagement with local communities, 
local authorities and planning departments.
Our portfolio and sustainability
	
– 100% central London, in attractive locations well served 
by local infrastructure with enduring customer demand.
	
– Located in markets with high barriers to entry playing to our strengths.
	
– Continual repositioning of buildings to enhance the customer 
experience, improve sustainability performance, futureproof 
value and enhance the environment in which they are located.
	
– Measures to improve the climate resilience of our buildings 
integrated within the design of our spaces.
	
– Positioned for future growth; 24% of portfolio in our HQ  
development or Flex refurbishment programme. Potential  
c.£0.5 billion commitment across seven on-site HQ development 
and Flex conversion schemes. 
	
– Disciplined capital allocation approach; 
must be accretive to existing portfolio.
	
– Tired, inefficient properties, often with 
poor EPC ratings, with angles to exploit.
	
– Attractive central London locations  
supported by infrastructure  
improvements/local investment.
	
– Discount to replacement cost 
and typically off-market.
	
– Off low rents and low capital  
values per sq ft.
	
– Optionality: flexible business plans.
	
– Opportunity to enhance sustainability 
credentials and grow our Flex portfolio.
	
– Ability to deliver profit on cost on 
development schemes of 12.5%-20.0% 
and an ungeared IRR of 10.0%-15.0%.
See more on our investment activities and Flex acquisition criteria 
on pages 28 and 29
	
– Through lease restructuring, 
the delivery of flexible space, 
refurbishment or redevelopment.
	
– Deliver high quality sustainable 
spaces into supportive markets that 
meet and exceed customer needs.
	
– Manage risk through pre-letting, 
joint ventures and forward sales.
	
– Deliver climate-resilient buildings that 
integrate market-leading sustainability 
standards, flexibility, amenity, wellbeing 
and technological innovation.
	
– Enhance the local environment 
and public realm.
	
– Deliver a lasting positive social impact 
in our communities.
See more on our development activities  
on pages 23 to 25
We apply our specialist skills to reposition properties…
…to create value
1,450hrs
Hours donated  
to XLP
 -12.1%
Like-for-like portfolio 
valuation decline1 
 100%
BREEAM ’Excellent’ 
completions 
 £338k
Contributed to our 
Decarbonisation Fund
See our KPIs on pages 16 and 17
See more on our stakeholder relationships  
on pages 69 to 72
See more on our portfolio and sustainability  
on pages 34 to 62
 Sustainability touches everything we do
…underpinned by key resources and relationships…
Acquire
Reposition
+30.2
Office Net Promoter 
Score, outperforming 
the industry average 
of +6.9
 £1.5m
GPE social value 
created
During the year, our 
acquisitions included 
141 Wardour Street, W1 
(above) to add to our Fully 
Managed office offer 
and the Soho Square 
Estate which has been 
added to our near-term 
development pipeline.
Repositioning  
buildings is key to 
adding value. This year, 
we commenced the 
redevelopment of 
French Railways House 
& 50 Jermyn Street, 
SW1 which will add 
67,600 sq ft of best-in-
class, office and retail 
space near St James’s 
and Piccadilly.
12
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our people and culture
	
– Experienced management team supported by specialist in-house 
Portfolio Management, Customer Experience, Development, 
Investment, Leasing and Finance teams and support functions.
	
– Entrepreneurial, collegiate and inclusive culture based on 
strong values with disciplined approach to risk management.
	
– Reward linked to purpose, strategy and values with close 
alignment with stakeholders to deliver value and outperformance.
	
– Effective governance structure.
	
– Positive employee engagement.
Our capital strength
	
– Consistently strong balance sheet and conservative 
financial leverage.
	
– Low cost, diversified debt facilities and plentiful liquidity.
	
– Evolving debt book to align with our values via  
ESG-linked financing.
	
– Sustainable Finance Framework in place.
	
– Disciplined allocation of capital through analytical, 
risk adjusted IRR decision making.
	
– Support low and progressive dividend policy.
	
– Tax efficient REIT structure.
See more in our investment activities 
on pages 28 and 29
See more about our customers  
on pages 69 and 70
	
– Deliver a ‘Customer First’ approach, 
providing efficient, resilient, healthy and 
innovative space to meet the demands 
of modern customers.
	
– Provide a greater choice of spaces to appeal 
to a variety of customer needs, whether on 
a Ready to Fit, Fitted or Fully Managed basis.
	
– Constantly evolving to lead emerging trends, 
including the use of technology to enhance 
the customer experience.
	
– Detailed business plan for every property 
reviewed quarterly to maximise total returns 
over our cost of capital.
	
– Strong sustainability credentials to maximise 
customer appeal, enhance the long-term 
property value and reduce obsolescence.
	
– Disciplined capital recycling through 
the sale of properties where we 
have executed our business plans, 
projected returns are insufficient 
or where we are able to monetise 
our expected future profits.
	
– Create a legacy of high quality, 
sustainable buildings to benefit 
London and the communities 
in which they are located.
	
– Reinvest proceeds into higher 
return opportunities.
	
– Return excess equity capital to 
shareholders when reinvestment 
opportunities are limited.
 98%
Staff survey 
participation rate 
 88%
Proud to work at GPE 
 74%
Employee  
Engagement Index 
 624p
EPRA NTA NAV 
32.6%
EPRA loan to value1
 £633m
Cash and undrawn  
facilities1 
See more on our culture and people  
on pages 63 to 68
See more on our capital strength  
on page 32
1.	 Includes share of joint ventures.
Operate & manage
Recycle
Our customers are 
demanding the very 
best spaces for their 
people, together 
with greater levels of 
service and amenity. 
Therefore, the spaces 
we deliver and the 
services we provide are 
evolving to meet these 
growing demands.
During the year, 
we made a number 
of small sales 
totalling £13.4 million, 
including 6 Brook 
Street, W1 (above). 
Looking forward, 
we anticipate further 
sales in the near term.
Strategic Report – Overview
13
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our near-term strategic priorities
We have a clear strategic focus that enables us to deliver attractive long-term value  
to our stakeholders. In the near term, our priority is to create exciting sustainable spaces 
for our customers, whether through expanding our flexible offerings or delivering on our 
ambitious development programme. 
Priorities for 2023/24
1   Progress 
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
2   Enhance 
portfolio through 
acquisitions  
and sales
3   Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
See more on pages 37 to 62
See more on pages 28 and 29
See more on pages 25 to 27
Key initiatives
	
– Complete new metering initiative 
to transform capture of energy 
usage across the portfolio.
	
– Deliver climate change Transition 
Plan by March 2024 in line with 
UK legislation.
	
– Implement initiatives under 
Innovation Strategy and explore 
emerging technologies including 
artificial intelligence.
	
– Acquire Flex opportunities to 
help deliver growth ambition. 
	
– Supplement development pipeline 
through acquisition.
	
– Maintain discipline of capital recycling 
through the sale of properties where 
we have executed our business  
plans and prospective returns are  
insufficient. Recycle proceeds 
into development programme.
	
– Explore opportunities to JV 
larger developments.
	
– Deliver Flex growth to more 
than one million sq ft over next 
five years, both organically 
and through acquisitions.
	
– Evolve and embed new marketing 
messages on Flex key selling points.
	
– Commence the refurbishment of 
6 St Andrew Street, EC4, Alfred Place, 
WC1 and Egyptian House, SW1.
Progress in year
	
– Development of real time 
analytics dashboard to increase 
business pace and agility.
	
– Further delivery of CRM platform 
to  support the scaling of our 
Fully Managed space.
	
– Refreshed Roadmap to Net Zero.
	
– Significant circular economy 
project to reuse steel underway 
at 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2.
	
– Metering project well underway.
	
– Two Flex acquisitions: 141 Wardour 
Street, W1 and Bramah House, SE1 
totalling £53 million.
	
– Soho Square Estate acquired for 
new HQ development for £70 million.
	
– Two small sales completed realising 
£13.4 million in proceeds.
	
– Flex space grown to 503,000 sq ft,  
or 23.5% of office  portfolio.
	
– Flex marketing collateral launched.
	
– Refurbishment underway at  
6 St Andrew Street, EC4,  
Egyptian & Dudley House, SW1  
Alfred Place, WC1 and Kent House, W1.
	
– Bramah House, SE1 and  
141 Wardour Street, W1 acquired.
Priorities for 2024/25
Unchanged
Unchanged
Unchanged
Key initiatives
	
– Develop multi-year, business 
wide digital transformation plan.
	
– Launch and embed our Roadmap 
to Net Zero v2.0.
	
– Deliver Transition Plan in line 
with sector guidance published 
in Q1 2024, including double 
materiality review.
	
– Utilise steel recovered from 
2 Aldermanbury Square in French 
Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1.
	
– Deploy proceeds from rights issue.
	
– Acquire Flex opportunities to help deliver 
one million sq ft growth ambition.
	
– Supplement development pipeline 
through acquisition.
	
– Maintain discipline of capital recycling 
through the sale of properties where 
we have executed our business  
plans and prospective returns are  
insufficient. Recycle proceeds into 
development programme and 
new acquisition opportunities.
	
– Complete refurbishments of  
31/34 Alfred Place, Kent House  
and 6 St Andrew Street.
	
– Maintain sector leading NPS score 
for Fitted and Fully Managed spaces.
	
– Acquire Flex opportunities to 
help deliver growth ambition.
	
– Achieve £15.0 million of annualised 
Fully Managed NOI by 31 March 2025.
14
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Priorities for 2023/24
4   Embed our 
‘Customer First’ 
approach
5   Deliver and lease 
the committed 
schemes
6   Prepare  
the pipeline
See more on pages 69 and 70
See more on pages 23 to 25
See more on pages 23 to 25
Key initiatives
	
– Roll out customer service proposition 
and training to all GPE employees 
and service partners.
	
– Establish KPIs, along with greater 
engagement from customers, 
to measure success of the 
Customer First programme.
	
– Deliver roll-out of phase 2 of CRM.
	
– Progress the redevelopment 
of 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2 
to time and budget.
	
– Maintain close relationship with 
Clifford Chance to help deliver 
a building that meets its needs.
	
– Deliver the refurbishment of  
6 St Andrew Street, EC4 by Q3 2024, 
prepare marketing campaign 
for launch.
	
– Resolve planning status at 
New City Court and Minerva House, 
both SE1.
	
– Commence the redevelopment 
of French Railways House 
& 50 Jermyn Street, SW1.
	
– Prepare Minerva House for start  
on-site.
Progress in year
	
– Customer service proposition 
rolled out to GPE workforce, 
with positive feedback. 
	
– New CRM capability to cover reporting 
on leasing funnel and tracking customer 
success and complaints stories.
	
– Established new customer insights 
and strategy function as well as 
new role focused on customer 
relationship management.
	
– Customer First added to GPE values 
and senior management objectives.
	
– 2 Aldermanbury Square on time and 
budget with expected completion, 
and hand-over to Clifford Chance 
in Q1 2026.
	
– Positive engagement with Clifford 
Chance, with confirmation that 
they have not taken up their option 
to hand space back to GPE.
	
– Refurbishment underway at  
6 St Andrew Street, with completion  
expected in Q4 2024 and marketing  
underway.
	
– Planning permission granted 
at Minerva House. 
	
– Planning permission refused 
at New City Court, alternative 
business plans underway together 
with early engagement with 
Southwark Council.
	
– Development commitment 
made at Minerva House, SE1, 
anticipated completion Q4 2026. 
Priorities for 2024/25
Unchanged
Unchanged
Unchanged
Key initiatives
	
– Roll-out GPE service proposition 
and standards to service partners, 
agents and contractors.
	
– Retail customer journey mapping.
	
– Embed Customer Relationship 
Engagement Strategy and team 
with the ambition to drive increased 
renewals and retention.
	
– Further develop customer 
insights function.
	
– Seek pre-letting opportunities at 
Minerva House, SE1 and French Railways 
House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1.
	
– Remain on track for delivery of 
2 Aldermanbury Square, French 
Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street 
and Minerva House.
	
– Complete refurbishment of  
6 St Andrew Street, 141 Wardour 
Street and 31/34 Alfred Place 
and commence leasing.
	
– Prepare Soho Square Estate 
for redevelopment.
	
– Reconfigure plans for the 
redevelopment of New City Court, 
SE1 and submit revised planning 
application to Southwark Council.
	
– Progress refurbishment plans for 
The Courtyard, WC1 following 
exchange of contracts in April 2024.
Strategic Report – Overview
15
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our key performance indicators
Rationale
TSR is a standard measure of shareholder value creation over 
time. It measures the movement in a company’s share price 
plus dividends expressed as an annual percentage movement.
Commentary
TSR of the Group has been benchmarked against the 
TSR of the FTSE 350 Real Estate Index (excluding agencies). 
The TSR of the Group was -21.3%1 for the year, compared 
to +10.7% for the benchmark given improved investor 
sentiment for non-office based real estate companies.
See more on page 140
Rationale
TAR is measured as absolute EPRA NTA per share growth 
(the industry standard measure of a real estate company’s 
success at creating value) plus any ordinary dividends paid, 
expressed as a percentage of the period’s opening EPRA NTA.
Commentary
TAR was -15.9% for the year. The TAR performance was 
driven by the impact of elevated interest rates on the 
property valuation.
See more on pages 30 to 33 and note 9  
to the financial statements
Total Accounting Return  
% (TAR)
Total Shareholder Return  
% (TSR)
Our KPIs are driven by our 
strategic priorities:
LTIP
Performance criteria for Executive Directors’ and 
certain senior managers’ long-term incentives 
plans (LTIP).
Exec Bonus
Performance criteria for Executive Directors’ and all 
employees’ annual bonuses save that the employee 
engagement and diversity measures do not apply 
to most colleagues to avoid conflicts of interest. 
The previously reported relative Total Property Return 
metric ceased to apply to bonuses following the 
adoption of the 2023 Directors’ remuneration policy 
and is no longer reported on as KPI in this section.
Our key performance indicators (KPIs) measure the principal metrics that we focus on to 
run the business, and they, along with the key measures that drive them, help determine 
how we are remunerated. Over the longer term, we aim to outperform our benchmarks 
through successfully executing our strategy. Over the last 12 months, the challenging macro-
economic environment impacted absolute property returns and real estate share prices. 
However, our strong operating performance helped us outperform many of our benchmarks.
(7.2)
1.7
6.6
Benchmark (italics)
(12.4)
21.1
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
(21.3)
(27.3)(28.5) 
20.8
10.7
-10
-20
30
10
20
-30
0
8.8
(8.8)
3.2
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
(15.9)
(7.8)
0
-5
20
10
15
-10
-15
-20
5
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
Benchmark (italics)
1
Progress sustainability  
and innovation agenda
2
Enhance portfolio through  
sales and acquisitions
3
Deliver on our Flex ambition
4
Embed our ‘Customer First’  
approach
5
Deliver and lease the 
committed schemes
6
Prepare the pipeline
AlI
All six priorities
LTIP
Exec Bonus2
All
LTIP
All
2.	 For the 2023/24 Annual Bonus, TAR per share is benchmarked against the 
relative performance of the FTSE 350 Real Estate Index (excluding agencies). 
While a number of companies are yet to publish their financial results, 
we anticipate that our TAR for the year underperformed the Index due 
to the comparatively stronger performance of other real estate sectors.
1.	 On a spot basis.
See Directors’ remuneration report  
on pages 124 to 143
16
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Scorecard
Measure
Link to shareholder returns
Performance
2023/24 minimum threshold
Optimising financial 
performance  
(during downturn)
5
1
4
2
3
1.	 Rent achieved on market 
lettings during year vs  
ERV (as per CBRE at start  
of year) – ‘% beat to 
market rent’
Will enhance property  
valuations and  
maximise income
+9.1%
≥ ERV @ 31 March 2023
2.	 Vacancy rate at year end  
(including completed 
development/refurbished 
space during year)
Will enhance property  
valuations and  
maximise income
1.3%
≤ 8.0%
3.	 Maintain appropriate  
liquidity
Underpins ability to acquire  
and invest in assets to drive 
capital and income returns
£633m
≥ £150m
Transforming the  
business and putting  
customers first
6
2
5
3
4
1.	 Hitting planning milestones 
in year (combination of 
planning submissions and 
planning approvals across 
entire portfolio)
Enhances property valuations
50%/100%
50% of Major and 
50% of Minor in-scope 
applications approved
2.	 Commitments to new  
Flex space over the year
Underpins strategy to 
expand Flex space in line 
with disclosed targets
102,353 sq ft
≥ 30,000 sq ft
3.	 Market leading  
office customer NPS
Underpins strategy, aids 
customer retention and 
enhances property valuations
+30.2
≥ +20.0
Delivering our  
Roadmap to Net Zero
1
5
6
1.	 Reduction in energy 
consumption (targets 
set each year against 
Roadmap)
Increases attraction of 
GPE space driving rents 
and enhancing property 
valuations
149.7 kWh/m2
≤ 191 kWh/m2
2.	 All new developments  
to be net zero or on  
track to be net zero
Underpins HQ repositioning 
strategy, customer demand, 
capital and income returns
83%
≥ 50%
Personal and  
business culture
All
1.	 Maintaining and nurturing 
a positive and inclusive 
culture (measured through 
employee engagement 
and inclusion index survey 
scores)
Retaining and attracting  
key talent critical to  
support growth
74%
≥65%
2.	 Achievements  
against gender and 
diversity targets (as 
detailed on page 130)
Ensuring diverse talent to 
develop and deliver strategy
Progress against  
both targets
Improvement on each 
target against position 
at 31 March 2023
Revised KPIs for 2023/2024
As explained in last year’s Annual Report, given the macro-economic backdrop, the Group has moved to a more target-based  
operational scorecard under the revised Directors’ remuneration policy approved by shareholders at the 2023 Annual 
General Meeting. The scorecard is designed to motivate management to optimise returns for shareholders by focusing on 
clear and measurable objectives to deliver our strategic priorities. Each of the measures is designed to directly or indirectly 
drive our financial KPIs and shareholder value in the longer term and form an integral part of the revised Directors’ remuneration 
policy to align performance and executive remuneration.
Strategic Report – Overview
17
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

We are integrating climate 
resilience across our business
We maintain our ambition to be at the leading edge of sustainable development
Applying climate resilience to our business strategy means we address the transitional risk of climate 
change and implement net zero carbon plans for each of our assets. Through our approach, we are 
committed to collaborating with all our partners to improve the resilience of our supply chain, and 
are constantly looking to embed nature-based solutions to increase biodiversity across our portfolio. 
Last year we also repositioned our Statement of Intent ‘The Time is Now’ to ensure we continue to 
deliver against our commitments and continue to support the resilience of our London communities.
In this section:
19
Statement from the Chief Executive
21
Our markets
23
Our development activities  
and capex programme
26
Our leasing and Flex activities
28
Our investment activities
30
Our financial results
34
Our portfolio
37
Sustainability
63
Our people and culture
69
Our stakeholder relationships
72
Engaging with our stakeholders
74
Our approach to risk
Strategic Report
Annual review
18
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Statement from the Chief Executive
Strong operational performance – strategic focus
Despite the continued macro-economic uncertainty and higher 
interest rates impacting our property valuation over the year, we 
delivered another strong operational performance. Our excellent 
leasing results, low vacancy and positive rental growth again 
demonstrated that our offices are in high customer demand, 
in a supply constrained market. With these supportive market 
conditions, characterised by the sharp bifurcation between 
the best spaces and the rest, our clear strategy of delivering 
best-in-class HQ buildings and Flex spaces for our customers 
means we have both a business and a portfolio which are 
well positioned to take advantage.
Positioned to take advantage of return of 
the cycle – net buyer for first time since 2013
In this financial year, we added to our portfolio, acquiring 
three properties off-market for £122.9 million, including 
two Flex acquisitions and one HQ in Soho Square, W1, that 
has been added to our development pipeline. With two 
small non-core sales, we were a net buyer for the first time in 
more than ten years. Since the start of the new financial year, 
we have also exchanged contracts to buy The Courtyard, WC1 
for £28.6 million in an asset swap deal, adding to our Flex 
cluster in Fitzrovia.
We believe the central London investment market is now at or 
around its trough and is turning in our favour with real property 
values having fallen to 2009 levels, triggered by elevated 
inflation and high interest rates. As a result, we fully expect to 
add to our growth prospects and have identified a compelling 
set of accretive acquisition opportunities. The rights issue, 
together with our already strong financial and liquidity 
position, will provide further capacity for new investment. 
With our strong track record of counter-cyclical investment 
and our experienced team, our prospects are appealing.
Strong leasing year – 9.1% ahead of ERV
During the year, we signed 66 new leases, delivering £22.5 million 
of new rent, with market lettings 9.1% ahead of the March 2023 
ERV. This includes 29 new deals across our Flex spaces, securing 
£13.7 million in rent at a 12.3% beat to the March 2023 ERV. 
At our Fully Managed spaces, we achieved average rents of 
£208 per sq ft, supporting our ambitions for further growth 
across our identified central London Flex clusters.
We also had many leasing successes across our retail portfolio, 
as the recovery strengthens with West End footfall back to 
near pre-pandemic levels and the Elizabeth line enhancing 
transport connectivity for shoppers, workers and tourists alike. 
We signed 26 retail leases delivering £7.0 million of new rent, 
beating the March 2023 ERV by 4.7%.
We value every customer – market leading 
NPS and high customer retention
Our well established Customer First approach, putting 
customer needs at the centre of everything we do, was 
further strengthened this year with the addition of a 
new employee value: ‘We value every customer’.
We also continued to deliver a leading Net Promoter Score 
of +30.2, significantly ahead of the office industry average 
of +6.9, which has supported strong customer retention. 
We retained 83% of our customers across the portfolio in the 
last 12 months, which helped us maintain our exceptionally 
high rent collection rates, securing in excess of 99% of all 
rents within seven working days, whilst also keeping our 
investment void low at 1.3%.
Rental value growth more than offset by 
increased yields – valuation performance impacted
With customers increasingly demanding the very best, 
sustainable spaces, they are competing in a market 
increasingly starved of new, Grade A supply, putting further 
upward pressure on prime rents. Across our portfolio, we saw 
a like-for-like increase in rental values of 3.8% over the year, 
with our retail rental values up 4.4%. Overall our office rents 
were up 3.6%, whilst our Fully Managed office spaces again 
outperformed, up 5.2%.
Despite this attractive rental growth, our property values 
reduced by 12.1%, reflecting the global impact of higher 
interest rates on property yields. However, this reduction 
was first half weighted and we believe prime property 
yields are now likely around their peak.
The property valuation decline reduced IFRS NAV and EPRA 
NTA per share by 17.6% over the year. When combined with 
an ordinary dividend maintained at 12.6 pence per share, 
our Total Accounting Return was minus 15.9%. Including the 
revaluation of the portfolio, we delivered an IFRS loss for 
the year of £307.8 million. Diluted EPRA EPS was 7.1 pence, 
a decline of 25.3%, primarily driven by the impact of the 
higher interest rate environment.
“Our clear strategy of delivering 
best-in-class HQ buildings and 
Flex spaces for our customers means 
we have both a business and a 
portfolio which is well positioned 
to take advantage of supportive 
market conditions.”
Toby Courtauld Chief Executive
Strategic Report – Annual review
19
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Statement from the Chief Executive continued
More rental value growth to come – 
London a true global city
Whilst macro-economic volatility persists, our confidence 
and belief in London remains. Unrivalled as one of the 
world’s most attractive and diverse mixed-use locations, 
London is a true global city. Central London is busy and 
office workers have returned, with hybrid working now 
the norm. 74% of our portfolio is in the West End and 93% 
located close to Elizabeth line stations.
Looking forward, we anticipate supportive rental conditions 
for the best spaces and are optimistic for further rental 
growth, with portfolio-wide guidance of 3% to 6% over the 
next financial year. For prime office space, our guidance 
is stronger still at 5% to 10%.
HQ repositioning – two new major commitments
We committed to the redevelopment of French Railways House 
& 50 Jermyn Street, SW1, following the agreement of a new 
headlease. Our prime office-led scheme on Piccadilly will 
provide 67,600 sq ft of new Grade A space and will embrace 
the principles of the circular economy. It is expected to 
complete in mid-2026 and deliver a profit on cost of 23.7%.
Our latest commitment at Minerva House, SE1, will take full 
advantage of its impressive River Thames frontage, creating an 
enviable South Bank HQ destination with new public realm  
and gardens, whilst delivering outstanding sustainability and  
re-use credentials. It is expected to complete in Q3 2026 
and deliver a profit on cost of 19.1%.
We have also made significant progress at 2 Aldermanbury 
Square, EC2. Clifford Chance LLP have leased the entirety of 
office space (321,100 sq ft) and our development works are 
progressing well, where we are substantially increasing the 
size of the building (up from 176,000 sq ft) and completion 
is expected in early 2026. Preparations for our two other  
near-term schemes continue, which, together with our 
committed schemes, will deliver 0.8 million sq ft of prime, 
predominantly office space with exemplary sustainability 
credentials, along with £76 million of ERV following our 
proposed £0.8 billion of total investment.
Flex spaces – four schemes on-site and 
on track for growth to one million sq ft
We have recently committed to the refurbishment of 
141 Wardour Street, W1 which will provide 29,900 sq ft of new 
Fully Managed led space in the heart of Soho. The building 
will form part of our Soho Flex cluster, close to our successfully 
established 16 Dufour’s Place, W1 and will complete next year. 
Our three other on-site Flex refurbishments are progressing 
well, with 6 St Andrew Street, EC4 and 31/34 Alfred Place, WC1 
on track to be delivered in Q3 2024, whilst Egyptian & Dudley 
House, SW1 will complete in 2025.
Together with good progress across our various on-floor 
refurbishments, we have increased our committed Flex space 
to 503,000 sq ft, as we advance towards our one million sq ft 
ambition. We expect that more than 75% of our Flex footprint 
will be delivered as Fully Managed spaces, generating 
more than £75 million of net operating income. To deliver 
on these ambitions, we have enhanced our organisational 
structure through promoting from within and the targeted 
recruitment of new talent.
Sustainability: updated Roadmap to Net Zero 
and embracing the circular economy
Last year, we updated our approach to climate resilience and 
our sustainability Statement of Intent. This year, we updated 
our Roadmap to Net Zero, increasing the scope and ambition 
of lowering our carbon emissions and aiming to deliver a 90% 
reduction in Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions to reach net zero by 
2040. Alongside these ambitious targets, we have continued 
to embrace the principles of the circular economy across our 
development projects, with market leading steel and glass 
reuse projects commenced during the year. 
Outlook
We are pleased to report on another year of strong 
operational performance. Our appealing blend of best in 
class HQ offices and Fully Managed Flex spaces, all in central 
London’s undersupplied markets, is proving attractive to 
customers, enabling us to beat the valuer’s ERV estimates 
by 9.1% on all signed leases, the highest margin since 2012 
and by 11.1% across our office lettings. Today, our portfolio 
is effectively full and, having delivered ERV growth towards 
the top end of last year’s guidance, we have upgraded our 
forecast for this year to 5% to 10% for our prime offices.
We remain strong believers in London’s long-term prospects; 
whilst its occupational markets, particularly for centrally located, 
Grade A space continue to power ahead with growing demand 
and shrinking supply, we believe its investment markets are 
at an inflection point; macro-economic effects ushered in a 
prolonged period of high inflation and elevated interest rates, 
triggering capital value declines of 58% in real terms since 2016, 
to levels we last saw after the GFC in 2009. We believe values 
are now at or around their cyclical trough and consequently, 
we turned net buyer during the year for the first time since 2013, 
acquiring £152 million of opportunities since March 2023 at an 
average 42% discount to replacement cost.
To enable us to take further advantage of disrupted 
investment market pricing, we intend to complete a fully 
underwritten rights issue and have exchanged on the acquisition 
of The Courtyard, a core West End Flex conversion opportunity. 
With an increasing pipeline of potential acquisitions, totalling  
circa £1.4 billion and a number of encouraging discussions 
ongoing, we can look forward to adding accretive opportunities 
to our well-located portfolio. Having completed our asset sales  
at more opportune points in the cycle, we will return to selling 
once investment markets recover.
In this context, GPE’s prospects are strong; our Flex and 
HQ development business streams are both growing with 
supportive market conditions, backed up by our market-
leading service to our customers; we expect to add further 
opportunities, capturing value in disrupted investment 
markets; our teams’ extensive experience of successful 
value creation in cyclical markets and our strong balance 
sheet will all combine to enable us to generate attractive 
shareholder returns.
20
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our markets
Occupational markets1
	
– Occupational market active; central London take-up 
10.5 million sq ft in year, but down 13.8% from prior year.
	
– Central London active demand 7.8 million sq ft, 
up 16.7% year on year (Knight Frank).
	
– Availability remains elevated at 25.9 million sq ft, 
marginally ahead of 31 March 2023 and remains 
45.9% ahead of the ten-year average.
	
– Space under offer high at 4.1 million sq ft, up from 
3.0 million sq ft at 31 March 2023 and above the  
ten-year average of 3.4 million sq ft.
	
– Central London vacancy rate 8.8% at 31 March 2024; 
up from 7.8% last year, newly completed vacancy 
rate at 1.9%.
	
– Supply remains tight; availability of space newly 
completed or under construction low, at 32.9% 
of total stock (8.5 million sq ft).
	
– Rents for prime spaces to significantly outperform  
Grade B rents at +19,1% v -3.5% respectively for the  
West End between 31 December 2023 and 2028 (Savills).
Interest rates were elevated over the course of the year, as inflation remained persistently 
higher than many had forecast. The resultant upward pressure on property yields more than 
outweighed any positive impact from supportive occupational markets, reducing investment 
market turnover and lowering property values. Looking forward, the UK has recently emerged 
from a shallow recession, the UK GDP outlook is more positive and inflation is abating, 
but many macro-economic risks remain.
Investment markets1
	
– Investment markets challenged given heightened 
interest rate environment.
	
– Office investment deals £5.2 billion in 2024, 
down significantly from £11.2 billion in 2023.
	
– Turnover in Q1 2024 still muted at £1.1 billion.
	
– We estimate that £3.9 billion of real estate is currently 
on the market to buy versus £19.2 billion of equity  
demand looking to invest.
	
– Given elevated global interest rates, prime yields 
have risen; CBRE reports prime yields of 4.0%  
and 5.75% for the West End and City respectively.
	
– Prime retail yields 4.25% Regent Street, 4.5% Oxford Street 
both stable and Bond Street softened by 25 bps to 3.0%.
The West End
	
– Office take-up 3.3 million sq ft, 
down 32.1% on preceding year.
	
– Availability 6.4 million sq ft, 
up 5.5%.
	
– Vacancy 4.7%, up from 3.3% at 
31 March 2023; vacancy of newly 
completed space only 1.1%.
	
– Prime office rental values 
£155 per sq ft at 31 March 2024, 
up 10.7% in year.
	
– Retail vacancy stabilised; 
Zone A rents maintained 
on key retail streets.
The City
	
– Office take-up 5.6 million sq ft, 
up 13.2% on preceding year.
	
– Availability 10.4 million sq ft, 
down 2.4%.
	
– Vacancy 11.8%, up from 10.9% 
at 31 March 2023; vacancy 
of newly completed space 
only 2.2%.
	
– Prime office rental values 
£77 per sq ft, up 6.9% in year.
	
– City space under offer 
2.2 million sq ft, the highest 
for ten years.
Near-term outlook
We actively monitor numerous lead indicators to help 
identify key trends in our marketplace. Over the last year, 
our property capital value indicators have improved, 
along with a more optimistic outlook for interest rates. 
However, risks remain, including the continued macro-
economic uncertainty and ongoing geopolitical tensions.
Today we expect the flight to quality to continue, with 
investment demand to support prime yields in the near 
term, with potential compression as rents grow and interest 
rates settle. In the occupational market, given a strong 
leasing and rental performance of the portfolio, our rental 
value growth range for the financial year to 31 March 2025 
is positive at between 3.0% and 6.0%, predominantly driven 
by the positive expected performance of our office portfolio.
1.	 To 31 March 2024 and sourced from CBRE unless otherwise stated.
Macro-economic backdrop
	
– IMF estimates global GDP growth to be stable at 3.2% 
in both 2024 and 2025.
	
– UK forecast to grow; 0.9% GDP growth in 2024, or 
1.8% p.a. over the next three years, with London expected 
to outperform at nearly double for the UK as whole at 
0.5% p.a. (Oxford Economics).
	
– Consumer confidence recovering from 2022 lows, 
now at highest level since January 2022.
	
– Deloitte CFO survey: sentiment among UK CFOs has 
risen for the third consecutive quarter, with uncertainty 
at a two-and-a-half year low.
	
– UK composite PMI surveys have improved in Q1 2024 
and indicate expansion; >50 at March 2024.
	
– Inflationary risks abating; UK CPI 3.2% in March 2024, 
anticipated to reduce over the remainder of the year.
Strategic Report – Annual review
21
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

The hybrid office
Employees increasingly value the flexibility and convenience 
of hybrid working. Therefore, the office needs to offer 
employees the best of both worlds, the connectivity they 
desire with home working, together with the benefits of  
face-to-face collaboration and team building that the office 
provides. In this environment, the demand for office space 
is no longer solely driven by headcount. Broader business 
requirements, workplace policies and employee behaviours 
all have an impact.
Improving retail demand
Retail occupational demand improved over the course of 2023, 
with footfall up and vacancy rates shrinking across London’s 
key shopping streets. Savills reported that vacancy levels on 
Oxford Street had fallen to 3.6% at Q4 2023, the lowest level 
since 2019. This lack of availability has translated into rental 
growth, with prime West End retail rents growing by 9.7% over 
the course of 2023. Whilst the economic backdrop remains 
challenging, we expect retail sentiment to continue to improve 
as domestic disposable incomes return to growth in 2024.
Our response
The workplace must be somewhere that is worth travelling to. 
The best offices need to act as a magnet for their workforce, 
providing services and amenities that employees cannot get 
at home. The quality of the office experience matters. In our 
view, the best buildings need to provide flexible work settings, 
support the health and wellbeing of employees, promote 
sustainability and be more human in scale and connected 
to the communities in which they sit. They also need to be 
well connected to high quality public transport to minimise 
the impact of the commute.
We are well placed to capitalise. Our developments are 
perfectly suited to meet this evolving demand and our Flex 
offers are increasingly catering to larger corporates that 
want additional flexibility, and high levels of service provision, 
to help drive employee engagement. Our portfolio is also 
centrally located with 93% of our buildings within 800 metres 
of an Elizabeth line station.
Our response
We believe in central London’s attraction as a premium retail 
destination. Its unique combination of tourist destinations, 
flagship stores, selection of restaurants and a deep cultural 
offer remains and will continue to attract shoppers from 
around the world.
Retail comprises 21% of our portfolio by value. We aim to 
provide high quality, modern retail units into locations with 
enduring appeal. Accordingly, the bulk of our activities 
centre on the prime shopping streets delivering new retail 
experiences into locations that benefit from the recently 
opened Elizabeth line.
This year, against this backdrop of improved demand, 
we completed £7.0 million of retail lettings, 4.7% ahead 
of the March 2023 ERV including a significant new letting 
with TK Maxx at Mount Royal, W1.
The growing demand for flexible spaces
London has witnessed significant growth in the demand for 
flexible office space in recent years. Advances in technology, 
the growth in start-up businesses, increased mobility in the 
workforce and the rise of the gig economy have helped drive 
this growth. A plethora of new suppliers have entered the 
market to meet this demand. Flexible spaces have bounced 
back quickly as people have returned to the workplace post 
pandemic and we expect this growth to continue.
The sustainability premium
The demand for highly sustainable spaces is growing fast. 
Customers, together with their employees, are increasingly aware 
of their impact on the environment and are prepared to pay a 
premium for spaces with the highest sustainability and wellbeing 
credentials. CBRE’s Sustainability Index demonstrates this trend, 
with energy efficient offices delivering higher total returns 
and more resilient performance during the recent downturn. 
Sustainability is now a prerequisite for achieving the best rents.
Our response
Whilst for many businesses, securing high quality,  
well-located space for longer-term occupation is vital, 
we recognise that customers are increasingly seeking 
an element of flexibility for some parts of their business. 
To meet this growing demand, we have a Fitted offer to 
provide dedicated, fully furnished space on flexible terms, 
allowing customers to move in and out of the space with 
ease. Where our customers want a higher level of service 
provision we have a growing Fully Managed offer, which 
extends our proposition to provide additional services and 
amenity. Interest in these spaces remains high. They typically 
let quicker and we are charging a premium for a hassle-free 
real estate experience. Over time we expect this to be the 
default requirement for spaces of less than 10,000 sq ft.
See more on pages 34 and 69
Our response
Sustainability is becoming an increasing differentiator 
and is widening the gap between the best space and 
the rest. Therefore, owners of real estate need the expertise 
to either create new high quality spaces or retro fit 
existing space in line with new and evolving requirements. 
Buildings that are not repositioned risk being stranded. We see 
this as an opportunity. We are an experienced developer 
with a track record of delivering the highly sustainable 
buildings that customers demand. We also know how to 
reposition assets through refurbishment and renovation. 
Furthermore, buildings with poorer sustainability credentials 
are a potential avenue for future acquisitions, allowing 
us to create value by transforming unloved buildings into 
desirable, highly sustainable, prime real estate.
See more on pages 37 to 62
Our markets continued
The nature of demand for our spaces is undergoing a significant transformation 
as key themes continue to shape and evolve our markets. These themes are united 
by a common thread – the widening gap in demand between the best spaces 
and the rest. Against this backdrop, we are well placed to outperform.
22
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our development activities and capex programme
Despite a challenging backdrop, we made good operational 
progress across our development programme. This included 
securing planning permission and committing to 
Minerva House, SE1, our commitment to the redevelopment 
of French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1 and the 
acquisition of the Soho Square Estate, W1. Today, our capex 
programme provides a significant platform for growth, 
with a capital commitment across our on-site schemes 
of £0.5 billion.
Repositioning our buildings through redevelopment 
and refurbishment is a core part of our business model 
and presents a significant organic growth opportunity. 
Our forecasts suggest that the future supply of new spaces 
in London is severely constrained. We estimate that only 
3.0 million sq ft p.a. of new space will be delivered on average 
over the next four years, in a market where the average 
take-up of new space is much greater, at 4.9 million sq ft p.a. 
Our significant capex programme is targeted to deliver new 
high quality space into these supportive markets through 
the delivery of new HQ developments and through the 
expansion of our Flex spaces.
Three committed HQ development schemes
Our development works are progressing well at our fully pre-let  
2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, where we are substantially 
increasing the size of the building to 322,600 sq ft (up from 
176,000 sq ft). Following the careful deconstruction of the 
previous building, the structural steel has been extracted and 
is being reconditioned for reuse to form the majority of the 
structural elements of French Railways House & 50 Jermyn 
Street (see below). This pioneering approach will nearly 
entirely eliminate the embodied carbon of the steel and help 
deliver our second net zero carbon building, after 50 Finsbury 
Square, EC2. The scheme also includes a number of public 
realm and amenity improvements that will have a positive 
impact on the local area and improve accessibility to the 
western entrance of the Liverpool Street Elizabeth line station. 
Clifford Chance LLP has confirmed that it will be proceeding 
to lease the entirety of office space (321,100 sq ft) following 
the expiry of their option to hand back the first to fourth floors 
of the building. Whilst the development is currently anticipated 
to deliver a loss on cost from the commitment date of 12.4%, 
given market yield expansion driven valuation declines to date, 
from the 31 March 2024 valuation the scheme is expected 
to deliver around £30 million of future profit.
At French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1, we have 
now obtained vacant possession and have commenced the 
strip out of the buildings. Our major office-led redevelopment 
will provide 67,600 sq ft (up from 54,700 sq ft) of new Grade A 
space and is expected to complete in mid-2026. The scheme 
is designed to embrace the principles of the circular economy 
which includes retaining the existing foundations and basement 
and reusing the structural steel from the demolition of 
2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2. Once complete, the building 
will provide best in class, column free space together with 
high-specification amenities including a wellness suite, 
private terraces on the upper floors, a communal roof terrace 
with panoramic views, as well as the highest sustainability 
credentials. We have £95 million cost to come and the scheme 
is anticipated to deliver a profit on cost of 23.7%, an ungeared 
IRR of 14.5% and a 6.4% development yield.
2023/24 Strategic priorities:
5  Deliver and lease  
the committed schemes
6  Prepare the pipeline
Business model
Acquire
Reposition
Operate & manage
Recycle
Operational measures1
2024
2023
Profit/(loss) on cost
3.5%
(2.1%)
Ungeared IRR
8.6%
4.4%
Yield on cost
6.0%
5.4%
Income already secured
32.3%
99.5%
BREEAM Excellent (targeted)
100%
100%
Committed capital expenditure 
to come
£498m
£265m
1.	 Committed HQ developments and Flex refurbishments  
at date of report.
Our approach
Upgrading our portfolio through development 
using targeted capital expenditure creates sustainable 
spaces with improved customer appeal and longevity. 
This enhances both rental values and capital returns. 
The cyclical nature of central London property markets 
means it is critical for us to match this development 
activity to the appropriate point in the cycle, delivering 
new buildings into a supportive market when quality 
space is scarce and demand is resilient. By combining 
our forensic analysis of market conditions with 
our active portfolio management, we aim to be 
opportunistic and flexible when planning the start 
and, therefore, completion dates for our schemes.
We have a good track record of matching our activities 
to the ebb and flow of London’s cyclical market and 
providing spaces that customers want. Today, we have  
three committed HQ development schemes and 
four Flex refurbishments and a substantial pipeline 
of opportunities. As a result, the successful leasing of 
these schemes and preparation of the development 
programme are key near-term strategic priorities.
“With demand for the best spaces strong, 
and the forward-look supply of new 
spaces increasingly scarce, our growing 
development activity feels well timed 
to benefit.”
Andrew White Development Director
Strategic Report – Annual review
23
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our development activities and capex programme continued
At Minerva House, SE1, Southwark Council resolved to grant 
planning permission for the redevelopment and good 
progress has been made to prepare the site to start this year. 
We committed to the development in April 2024, and our 
plans will take the overall commercial space to 143,100 sq ft, 
an increase of approximately 56% on the existing area. 
Our proposals will take full advantage of the building’s 
river frontage and, by adding additional storeys, we will be 
able to create outdoor terraces and amenity space with 
commanding views over central London. The refurbishment 
will also improve the public realm around the building, creating 
new and improved connections through the site as well as 
attractive new gardens that will contribute to local greening 
and biodiversity and provide space for people to enjoy in the 
setting of Southwark Cathedral. Our proposals will retain and 
reuse the majority of the existing building’s structure, including 
two primary façades and provide market leading sustainability 
credentials. The scheme is anticipated to deliver a profit on 
cost of 19.1%, an ungeared IRR of 11.7% and a development 
yield of 7.0%.
See our case study on pages 08 and 09
In total, across the three on-site HQ schemes we have 
committed expenditure to come of £424 million.
Two near-term development schemes
Beyond our three committed schemes, we have a substantial 
and flexible pipeline of four uncommitted HQ schemes, 
including two schemes in our near-term pipeline.
At our recently acquired Soho Square Estate, W1, we continue 
to work up our plans to refine the existing planning consent to 
deliver around 100,300 sq ft of new Grade A office and prime 
retail space. The redevelopment will provide a best-in-class 
HQ office building on Soho Square with flagship retail fronting 
Oxford Street, with multiple private terraces and a communal 
roof terrace, all adjacent to the Tottenham Court Elizabeth 
line station. We anticipate starting on site early next year. 
We anticipate that the redevelopment will deliver healthy 
returns, with an expected profit on cost of 20.7%, an ungeared 
IRR of 10.4% and a development yield of 5.8%.
See our case study on page 11
At New City Court, SE1, we submitted two planning 
applications to Southwark Council to redevelop the building, 
the first in December 2018 for a 372,500 sq ft scheme, and 
a second in April 2021 for a 389,100 sq ft scheme.
Following an appeal for non-determination, in September 
2023, we received confirmation that the Planning Inspector’s 
report recommended the planning applications were refused 
and the Secretary of State agreed with its conclusions.
As a result of the planning decision, we are exploring 
the opportunity to reuse and extend the existing building, 
combining Fully Managed and Ready to Fit spaces, to create 
a renewed building with exemplary sustainability credentials, 
amenity provision, flexible spaces and far-reaching views 
from large, landscaped roof terraces.
Three committed HQ schemes:  
533,300 sq ft
2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2
Size
322,600 sq ft
Construction cost
£302m
Expected completion date
Q1 2026
BREEAM target
Excellent
Distance to Elizabeth line station
250 metres
Computer generated images.
Minerva House, SE1
Size
143,100 sq ft
Construction cost
£136m
Expected completion date
Q1 2027
BREEAM target
Outstanding
Distance to London Bridge station
250 metres
French Railways House & 50 Jermyn St, SW1
Size
67,600 sq ft
Construction cost
£114m
Expected completion date
Q3 2026
BREEAM target
Outstanding
Distance to Elizabeth line station
750 metres
 533,300 sq ft
Three committed HQ redevelopments
24
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Commitment to further Flex expansion
In order to expand our Flex office offers, and meet our 
ambitious targets for growth, we are on-site at four 
refurbishments to provide new dedicated Fully Managed 
spaces, as well as converting a significant number of 
individual floors across our portfolio.
Four committed Fully Managed refurbishments
We have recently committed to the refurbishment of 141 
Wardour Street, W1 which will provide 29,900 sq ft of new Fully 
Managed led space in the heart of Soho. 141 Wardour Street 
will build on our success to date at nearby 16 Dufour’s Place, 
W1, delivering light-filled floorplates of 2,000 to 4,000 sq ft, 
terraces on the upper floors and excellent amenity space. 
The construction is expected to complete in early 2025 
with capex to come of £20 million.
At 6 St Andrew Street, EC4, we started on site in June 2023 
to deliver 47,800 sq ft of new Grade A Fully Managed offices. 
Our plans include the addition of two new storeys, together 
with extensive terracing and significant amenity throughout 
the building. We anticipate that the scheme will complete 
in Q3 2024, and will cost £16 million to finish.
At 31/34 Alfred Place, WC1, in the heart of Fitzrovia, 
we have committed to an extensive refurbishment of the 
entirety of the 41,700 sq ft building to provide outstanding 
Fully Managed office space. The cost to convert the space 
will be £13 million and we anticipate the scheme will be 
completed in Q4 2024.
At Egyptian and Dudley House, SW1, we are comprehensively 
refurbishing the building to provide 25,600 sq ft of Fully 
Managed space. We are infilling lightwells to expand 
floorplates, creating new first-floor amenity space and 
creating an external terrace with garden to provide 
additional amenity and biodiversity. The scheme is expected 
to complete in spring 2025 and will cost £25 million to finish.
Together with a number of other conversions, we anticipate 
growing our Flex offerings from 503,000 sq ft today to 
605,000 sq ft organically. Moreover, we are aiming to add to 
this programme through acquisition, as demonstrated by our 
recent exchange of contracts to purchase of The Courtyard, 
WC1, and are targeting enlarging our Flex offerings to one 
million sq ft over the coming years.
How we are positioned
In total, our HQ development and Flex capex programme 
provides a strong platform for organic growth. Together, 
our seven on-site schemes will deliver 678,000 sq ft of well-
designed, tech-enabled and sustainable space into a market 
where prospective supply is increasingly limited. Moreover, 
with around £120 million of anticipated profit to come from 
these schemes, they will provide a strong foundation to 
the Group’s growth in the coming years.
In total, our three committed and two near-term schemes 
comprise around £770 million of anticipated capital 
expenditure and are expected to deliver 0.8 million sq ft of 
best-in-class, highly sustainable space, perfectly placed to 
benefit from a market where forward look supply is severely 
constrained. With a further three schemes in the medium-term 
pipeline, our HQ development programme totals 1.1 million 
sq ft and will provide strong growth potential over the 
coming years, which we plan to supplement through 
further acquisitions.
Two near-term HQ schemes:  
270,300 sq ft
Soho Square Estate, W1
Proposed size
100,300 sq ft
Earliest start
2025
Opportunity area
Core West End
Distance to Elizabeth line station
100 metres
New City Court, SE1
Proposed size
c.170,000 sq ft
Earliest start
2026
Opportunity area
Southbank
Distance to London Bridge station
100 metres
 c.£120m
Development surplus to come  
from seven on-site schemes
Indicative computer generated images.
Strategic Report – Annual review
25
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our leasing and Flex activities
With a continued high demand for best-in-class spaces, 
we delivered another strong leasing performance. 
Supported by our Fully Managed spaces we signed 
£22.5 million of new leases, beating rental values by 9.1%. 
Our customer retention also remained high at 83%. 
During the year, our rental values increased by 3.8% across 
the portfolio. Within this, our retail space outperformed our 
offices for the first time in a while, with like-for-like retail rental 
values increasing by 4.4% compared with a 3.6% increase 
in office rental values. Within our offices, our Fully managed 
rental values outperformed, increasing by 5.2% on a  
like-for-like basis.
With customers increasingly demanding the very best, 
sustainable spaces, we expect the trend of the best 
spaces outperforming the rest to continue. This supportive 
demand in a market starved of new, Grade A supply, means 
the occupational market dynamics remain in our favour. 
Our rental growth guidance for the next year continues 
to remain positive, at 3.0% to 6.0%, with the best spaces 
even higher at 5.0% to 10.0%.
See our markets on pages 21 and 22
The key leasing highlights for the year included:
	
– 66 new leases and renewals completed during the year 
(2023: 105 leases), generating annual rent of £22.5 million 
(our share: £19.8 million; 2023: £52.8 million), with market 
lettings 9.1% ahead of ERV;
	
– of the new leases signed, five were Fitted and 24 were 
Fully Managed space, achieving on average £208 
per sq ft on the Fully Managed space, 12.6% ahead of 
March 2023 ERV;
	
– 26 new retail leases securing £7.0 million of rent with 
market lettings 4.7% ahead of March 2023 ERV, including 
new London flagship store for TK Maxx on Oxford Street;
	
– 11 rent reviews securing £8.4 million of rent (our share: 
£5.8 million; 2023: £6.3 million) were settled at an increase 
of 3.3% over the previous rent and 16.7% ahead of ERV 
at review date;
	
– total space covered by new lettings, reviews and renewals  
was 401,500 sq ft (2023: 861,200 sq ft);
	
– the Group’s vacancy rate decreased to 1.3%  
(31 March 2023: 2.5%);
	
– the Group’s rent roll has increased by 1.0% to £107.5 million 
following a successful leasing period (not including the 
pre-let at 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2) offset by vacant 
possessions ahead of developments; and
	
– 97% (by area) of the 104 leases with breaks or expiries 
in the 12 months to 31 March 2024 were retained (83%),  
re-let, or are under offer, leaving 10,200 sq ft still  
to transact.
2023/24 Strategic priority:
3  Deliver on our Flex ambition
5  Deliver and lease the  
committed schemes
Business model
Acquire
Reposition
Operate & manage
Recycle
Operational measures
2024
2023
New lettings and renewals
£22.5m
£55.5m
Premium to ERV1 (market lettings)
9.1%
3.3%
Vacancy rate2
1.3%
2.5%
ERV growth2
3.8%
2.1%
Reversionary potential2
10.1%
2.1%
Rent collected within seven days3
99.3%
99.5%
1.	 ERV at beginning of financial year.
2.	 Including share of joint ventures.
3.	 For March 2024 quarter.
Our approach
We consider that a close relationship with our customers 
is vital to our success. As a result, we manage all aspects 
of our property portfolio in-house, enabling us to 
continually refine our understanding of what customers 
want and how we can meet their needs. We aim to 
deliver a premium experience, through our high quality 
teams, the energised spaces we provide and high 
levels of customer service, all supported by technology. 
Our Leasing and Marketing teams ensure the spaces 
appeal to market demand and with our Development 
team to ensure that vacant possession is achieved 
on a timely basis ahead of key development starts, 
wherever possible relocating customers to other 
buildings within our portfolio.
Our portfolio managers, supported by our Workplace 
and Customer Experience teams, administer a portfolio 
of approximately 262 customers, from a diverse range 
of industries across 38 buildings. This diversity limits 
our exposure to any one customer or sector, with our 
20 largest customers at 31 March 2024 accounting 
for 38.2% (2023: 39.4%) of our rent roll.
“The fundamentals in our leasing markets 
remain strong. We have delivered another 
strong leasing year, with rents 9.1% 
ahead of the valuer’s estimate. With this 
success it reaffirms our confidence in 
our portfolio rental value guidance of 3% 
to 6% growth for our next financial year, 
with the best space likely higher still.”
Marc Wilder Leasing Director
 £22.5m
Leases signed in strong 
leasing year
26
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Retail: £7.0 million, resurgent demand
During the year, our retail leasing was strong. At our Piccadilly 
Buildings, San Carlo, the award-winning restaurant group, 
signed a lease for its new flagship Cicchetti, occupying 
7,000 sq ft over ground and basement floors, across two units.
On Regent Street, we completed two flagship retail lettings 
to The North Face and JOSEPH. The North Face has traded 
successfully at GPE’s Walmar House site since 2015 and 
signed a 10 year lease on an additional 10,000 sq ft ahead 
of 31 March 2023 ERV. Further south on Regent Street, 
British contemporary designer fashion brand, JOSEPH, also 
signed a lease for a new store located at Kingsland House, 
124 Regent Street, W1, completing the repositioning of 
the retail offering at the building.
At Mount Royal, 508/540 Oxford Street, W1, TK Maxx, Europe’s 
leading off-price apparel and homeware retailer, signed 
up for its latest London flagship store. The store comprises 
22,500 sq ft across the ground and first floor levels, with 
70 ft of Oxford Street frontage. This will be TK Maxx’s second 
store on Oxford Street. In addition, the high street health 
and beauty retailer, Superdrug, also recently re-geared 
its retail lease for their 8,000 sq ft store at Mount Royal, 
committing to another 10 years.
In April 2024, we let the retail space at 141 Wardour Street, 
W1 to British luxury retail brand, REPRESENT, for its new 
London flagship store. The space comprises 5,000 sq ft across 
two floors, which will be its second store globally to date, 
following its LA opening in West Hollywood. 
Customer retention 83%
Customer relationship management and retention are 
also a key part to our success. In addition to delivering 
market leading NPS scores, our customer retention numbers 
are strong. We have retained 83% across the whole portfolio 
in the last 12 months.
This high retention rate helps reduce vacancy costs and lowers 
refresh capital expenditure in our Flex spaces. Furthermore, 
should a customer need to move, we aim to utilise our 
broad portfolio to allow them to grow or contract with us. 
This includes transitioning some of our long-term Ready 
to Fit customers into our Flex space, as well as providing 
opportunities for some of our smaller Flex customers to 
graduate into larger and longer-term spaces as they grow.
How we are positioned
Despite a weak macro-economic backdrop, we anticipate 
that current occupational trends will continue. We expect 
that the demand for the best spaces will outstrip supply 
and the trend for smaller spaces to be provided on a flexible 
basis to increasingly become the norm. Buildings that are 
unable to meet this evolving demand, particularly in the 
face of competition from elevated secondary supply, will 
underperform. The gap between the best and the rest is 
likely to widen further.
Against this backdrop, we remain well positioned: our 
leasing record remains strong, our committed development 
programme is focused on high quality, well-located office-
led schemes that have enduring demand, we are delivering 
innovative products that lease well, office rents remain 
affordable and 93% of our portfolio is within walking 
distance of an Elizabeth line station.
Flex: £13.7 million, strong leasing successes
At 16 Dufour’s Place, W1, we renewed the 3rd floor (3,100 sq ft)  
lease with a marketing firm on a Fully Managed basis. They  
have taken an additional two year lease, paying a rent 
of £278 per sq ft, an increase of 53% on their previous terms. 
This new lease, together with a number of other lease renewals 
in the building during the year, has increased the average 
rent in the building to £250 per sq ft.
At The Hickman, E1, we completed the letting to New Look 
on the third and fourth floors (23,242 sq ft) on a Fitted basis 
on ten-year leases with an option to break at year seven. 
New Look was an existing GPE customer and vacated 
35,860 sq ft at Wells & More, W1, which has provided GPE 
with the opportunity to refurbish and re-lease the space in 
this prime Fitzrovia location. The Hickman is now fully let.
In total, we signed £13.7 million of new leases in our Flex space; 
£1.6 million Fitted and £12.1 million Fully Managed leases at a 
combined 12.3% ahead of March 2023 ERV. Our Fully Managed 
deals achieved on average £208 per sq ft, 12.6% ahead 
of March 2023 ERV. 
Our Flex space continues to grow on target to hit 
one million sq ft 
During the year, including our Flex Partnerships, we increased 
our committed Flex offerings across the portfolio and they now 
total 503,000 sq ft (or c.23.5% of our offices). Our four on-site 
Flex refurbishments are progressing well, with 6 St Andrew 
Street, EC4 and Alfred Place, WC1 on track to be delivered 
in Q3 2024, whilst Egyptian and Dudley House, SW1 and 
141 Wardour Street, W1 will complete in 2025. 
See our Development Activities on pages 23 to 25
Looking forward, our portfolio is well suited to further Flex 
growth. Our average building size is small at around 65,000 
sq ft and more than 80% of our floors are sub-10,000 sq ft. 
Together with good progress across our various on-floor 
refurbishments, we have increased our committed Flex space 
to 503,000 sq ft (up from 434,000 in September 2023) as 
we remain on track to meet our one million sq ft ambition. 
Moreover, we are seeing continued strong demand for our Flex 
spaces and, following a strong leasing, our completed Fitted 
and Fully Managed spaces are now 98% let. Furthermore, 
we are excited for opportunities to further supplement this 
growth through acquiring buildings that lend themselves 
to our flexible space offer. In total, we are targeting growth, 
both organically and through acquisition, to one million sq ft.
Ready to Fit: £1.8 million deals completed
We completed ten Ready to Fit deals across various buildings 
during the year, beating the March 2023 ERV by 2.2%.
At 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, Clifford Chance chose not to 
exercise their option to hand back the first to fourth floors of 
the building (up to 89,000 sq ft) in early March 2024, confirming 
their commitment to all of the office space. Good progress 
has been made ahead of the building’s completion in Q1 2026 
and we look forward to welcoming them to the building. 
See our Development Activities on pages 23 to 25
Strategic Report – Annual review
27
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our investment activities
Despite a muted investment market, we were net investors 
during the year, acquiring three buildings to augment both 
our HQ repositioning pipeline and our Flex office offers. 
Looking forward, our acquisition pipeline is growing and 
since the year end we have further added to our Flex offer 
with our recent exchange of contracts to purchase the 
Courtyard, WC1.
Acquisitions for the year ended 31 March 2024
Price
£m
NIY
%
Area  
sq ft
Cost 
per  
sq ft
Soho Square Estate, W1
70.0
2.1%
57,500
7721
141 Wardour Street, W1
39.0
n/a
33,700
1,156
Bramah House, SE1
13.9
5.9%
16,000
892
Total
122.9
107,200
911
1.	 On consented area.
In August 2023, we acquired the Soho Square Estate, W1, 
for £70.0 million (£772 per sq ft on consented NIA). The site is 
located in the heart of the West End at the eastern end of 
Oxford Street and backs onto Soho Square, just 100 metres 
from the new Tottenham Court Road Elizabeth line station. 
The 0.5 acre site benefits from planning consent to demolish 
the existing buildings and deliver around 100,300 sq ft of 
new Grade A office and prime retail space.
We intend to re-work the designs to improve the quality 
of the space, further increasing its attractiveness to 
prospective customers in a materially undersupplied 
market. The redevelopment will provide a best-in-class 
HQ office building on Soho Square with flagship retail 
fronting Oxford Street, with multiple private terraces 
on the upper floors and a communal roof terrace.
In May 2023, we acquired 141 Wardour Street, W1 for 
£39.0 million (£1,156 per sq ft). The 33,700 sq ft building was 
vacant, had been stripped out by the previous owner and 
benefited from planning consent for a comprehensive 
refurbishment. The building is in the heart of Soho, prominently 
positioned on the corner of Wardour Street and Broadwick 
Street and within a five-minute walk of the new Tottenham 
Court Road Elizabeth line station. The building is perfectly 
suited to our Fully Managed offer and will provide best-in-class 
office and retail accommodation. 
Also in May 2023, we acquired Bramah House, SE1 for 
£13.9 million, reflecting a 5.9% net initial yield and a capital 
value of £892 per sq ft. The 16,000 sq ft freehold building 
is multi-let, and over time, we intend to convert the space 
to Fully Managed offices. The building is located opposite 
our existing ownership at Woolyard and will add to a 
growing Fully Managed cluster. 
Sales for the year ended 31 March 2024
Price
£m
Premium/
(discount) 
to book 
value %
Price per  
sq ft
£
NIY
%
Poland Street, W1
5.0
(13.4%)
995
5.5%
6 Brook Street, W1
8.4
–
2,306
3.0%
Total
13.4
(5.4%)
1,546
We also took the opportunity to sell two smaller non-core 
West End assets for £13.4 million, at a 5.4% discount to the 
March 2023 valuation.
2023/24 Strategic priority:
2  Enhance portfolio through  
sales and acquisitions
Business model
Acquire
Reposition
Operate & manage
Recycle
Operational measures1
2024
2023
Acquisitions
£122.9m
£37.1m
Capital value per sq ft
£911
£705
Sales
£13.4m
£217.8m
Discount to book value2
(5.4%)
(1.1%)
Capital value per sq ft
£1,546
£1,472
Total investment transactions3
£136.3m
£254.9m
Net investment4
£109.5m
£(180.7)m
1.	 Including share of joint ventures.
2.	 Based on book values at start of financial year.
3.	 Purchases plus sales.
4.	 Purchases less sales.
Our approach
Buying at the right price and selling at the right time is 
central to our business model. Using our extensive network of 
market contacts, our Investment team adopts a disciplined 
approach with clearly defined acquisition criteria.
See more on pages 12 and 13
To supplement our organic Flex growth, we are also 
targeting acquisitions suitable for conversion to 
Flex office space, with the following requirements:
	
– amenity-rich locations with excellent transport links;
	
– clustering around existing GPE holdings is desirable;
	
– 30,000 – 60,000 sq ft with divisible floorplates;
	
– target unit size of 2,000 – 6,000 sq ft;
	
– ability to create internal and external amenity space;
	
– high quality ground floor experience;
	
– product and market appropriate refurbishment capex; and
	
– opportunity to deliver stabilised income of 6%+.
Once we have acquired a property, the Investment 
team works closely with our Portfolio Management and 
Development teams to deliver the business plan and 
maximise the property’s potential. Every asset’s business 
plan is updated quarterly, providing estimates of forward 
look returns under different market scenarios. These plans 
also help to inform our sales activities, with the assets 
providing the lower risk-adjusted returns often being 
sold and the proceeds recycled into better performing 
opportunities or returned to shareholders.
“The acquisition of the Soho Square Estate 
represents a fantastic opportunity for us to 
develop a strategic West End freehold site 
into a best-in-class headquarters building 
with excellent sustainability credentials.”
Dan Nicholson Executive Director
28
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Disciplined approach
With interest rates remaining elevated, our investment 
markets have slowed and we have seen asset values decline, 
particularly for assets with vacancy, short-term income or 
development risk. We anticipate that against this backdrop 
some property owners will be increasingly motivated to 
sell and fully expect further opportunities to buy over the 
course of 2024. However, we remain disciplined. Any potential 
purchase needs to outperform the assets we already own, 
and with our existing portfolio stacked with opportunity, 
the hurdle is high.
How we are positioned
We are actively seeking new buildings for our Flex offerings, 
as well as opportunities for HQ repositioning or development 
and we increasingly expect the sustainability challenge to 
provide us with opportunities to acquire stranded assets 
needing a sustainability solution.
Encouragingly, there are clear signs that the investment 
market is moving in our favour, with more opportunities trading 
closer to our view of fair value. Furthermore, we currently 
have £1.4 billion of assets actively under review. They are 
predominantly off market, split broadly equally between HQ 
repositioning opportunities and Flex and around half are 
in the West End. Beyond this we have a further watchlist 
of £1.4 billion additional opportunities which we are 
actively tracking.
Current value deals under review £bn  
£1.4 billion under review – 27 buildings
1.6
2.0
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
May
2019
Nov
2019
May
2020
Nov
2020
May
2021
Nov
2021
May
2022
Nov
2022
May
2023
Nov
2023
Mar
2024
Flex
HQ Repositioning
49%
51%
Of these opportunities, three buildings, totalling around 
£250 million were near-term opportunities one of which 
recently exchanged at The Courtyard, WC1. We have 
exchanged to buy the building for £10.4 million of cash and 
through a property exchange of 95/96 New Bond Street 
for £18.2 million. The Courtyard comprises 62,000 sq ft of 
vacant office and partially let retail space and is well suited 
to be repositioned into the Group’s Fully Managed offering. 
The Courtyard is located in a prime West End location, 
around 400 meters from Tottenham Court Road Elizabeth 
line station, and is adjacent to Alfred Place, one of the 
Group’s other Fully Managed buildings. 
Soho Square Estate, W1
Area
57,500 sq ft
Acquisition date
August 2023
Price
£70m
Opportunity
HQ redevelopment
Distance to Elizabeth line station
100 metres
141 Wardour Street, W1
Area
33,700 sq ft
Acquisition date
May 2023
Price
£39m
Opportunity
Fully Managed refurbishment
Distance to Elizabeth line station
250 metres
Bramah House, SE1
Area
16,000 sq ft
Acquisition date
May 2023
Price
£13.9m
Opportunity
Fully Managed refurbishment
Distance to London Bridge station
350 metres
Three acquisitions; all off market
Strategic Report – Annual review
29
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our financial results
As is usual practice in our sector, we use alternative performance 
measures (APMs) to help explain the performance of the 
business. These include quoting a number of measures on 
a proportionately consolidated basis to include joint ventures, 
as it best describes how we manage the portfolio, like-for-like 
measures and using measures prescribed by EPRA. The measures 
defined by EPRA are designed to enhance transparency 
and comparability across the European real estate sector. 
Reconciliations of APMs are included in note 9 of the 
financial statements.
See more about performance measures and  
EPRA metrics on page 33 and note 9 to the accounts
Lower IFRS NAV and EPRA NTA per share  
driven by valuation declines
IFRS NAV and EPRA NTA per share at 31 March 2024 were 
624 pence per share, a decrease of 17.6% over the year, 
largely due to the 12.1% like-for-like valuation decrease 
in the property portfolio. When combined with ordinary 
dividends paid of 12.6 pence per share, this delivered 
a Total Accounting Return of minus 15.9%.
EPRA NTA pence per share
700
550
500
750
800
31 March
2024
600
650
Increase
Decrease
Total
31 March
2023
757
Revaluation
(127)
Loss on
disposals
(1)
Ordinary
dividends
(13)
EPS
7
Other
1
624
The main drivers of the 133 pence per share decrease 
in EPRA NTA from 31 March 2023 included:
	
– the decrease of 127 pence per share arising from the 
revaluation of the property portfolio, with virtually all 
of the decline arising from upward pressure on property 
yields as a result of higher interest rates;
	
– EPRA earnings for the year of 7 pence per share 
enhanced NTA; and
	
– ordinary dividends paid of 13 pence per share reduced NTA.
At 31 March 2024, the Group’s net assets were £1,583.0 million, 
down from £1,918.6 million at 31 March 2023, with the decrease 
largely attributable to the decrease in property valuation 
of £322.2 million. EPRA NDV and EPRA NRV were 644 pence 
and 691 pence at 31 March 2024 respectively, compared with 
790 pence and 826 pence at 31 March 2023.
See more about our capital strength on page 32
Revenue increased due to increased rental income
Revenue for the year was £95.4 million, up from £91.2 million 
on the prior year, driven by higher gross rental income (up 
£0.6 million), increased service charge income (up £1.9 million)
and greater Fully Managed services income (up £2.7 million) 
given its expansion. The increase in revenue was supported by 
our successful leasing, where we signed 66 leases, generating 
new annual income of £22.5 million p.a. (our share: £19.8 million) 
and reduced our investment void from 2.5% at 31 March 2023 
to 1.3% at 31 March 2024.
Net rental income, after taking account of expected credit losses, 
lease incentives and ground rents, was £72.1 million, up from 
£70.9 million in the prior year, as we saw the benefit from the 
commencement of new leases given our strong leasing year 
and a reduced credit loss provision as our rental collection 
rates returned to more normalised levels.
Given the increase of our Fully Managed spaces during the 
year, and the associated management information, we have 
presented our Fully Managed spaces as a separate segment.
Adjusting for acquisitions, disposals and transfers to and from 
the development programme, like-for-like rental income 
(including share of joint ventures) increased by 4.1% excluding 
expected credit losses.
Joint venture fee income for the year was £1.7 million, 
a decrease of £0.7 million, as a result of limited leasing 
or sales activity in the joint ventures during the year. 
Strong rent collection
We secured in excess of 99% of all rents, including in our joint 
ventures, within seven days of the due date. Since 1 April 2023,  
four of our customers have gone into administration, 
representing less than 0.7% of our rent roll. At 31 March 2024, 
we held rent deposits and bank guarantees totalling £21.3 million, 
including our share of joint ventures.
 £1.6bn
Net assets
“Despite a strong operating 
performance, our financial results 
were adversely impacted by the 
higher interest rate environment, 
reducing valuations and increasing 
the Group’s cost of debt.”
Nick Sanderson Chief Financial & Operating Officer
30
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Cost of sales increased
Cost of sales increased from £32.2 million to £33.3 million 
for the year ended 31 March 2024. This increase was primarily 
driven by increased service charge expenses, which includes 
Fully Managed services costs, which rose as our Fully Managed 
spaces grew over the year. At 31 March 2023, we had 55 
Fully Managed units, at 31 March 2024 this rose to 82 units. 
Other property expenses reduced by £5.0 million, due to lower 
average levels of vacancy reducing payments for business 
rates on empty spaces, reduced leasing costs as activity was 
lower given last year’s record performance and lower amounts 
paid to third parties in respect of joint venture transactions 
due to lower levels of activity.
Taken together, net service charge income, net Fully Managed 
services income and expenses, other property costs and 
expected credit loss provisions for service charges reduced 
to £11.4 million from £15.2 million in the prior year.
Joint venture earnings
EPRA earnings from joint ventures were £9.8 million, unchanged 
on the prior year, with a £1.2 million increase in net rental income 
offset by higher property and administration costs.
Administration costs
Administration costs were £42.3 million, £4.0 million higher than 
the previous year. The increase in the Group’s overhead was 
due to an increase in employment costs, due to inflationary 
salary uplifts and the cost associated with team restructuring 
of around £2.0 million. In addition, provisions for share-based 
payments returned to more normalised levels as the reversal 
of prior year charges under the Group’s LTIP scheme in the 
year ended 31 March 2023 did not reoccur in the current year. 
Looking forward, we anticipate that recent years’ growth 
in the Group’s overhead cost will moderate significantly.
Increased interest costs
Gross interest paid on our debt facilities was £26.5 million, 
£8.7 million higher than the prior year. This increase was 
primarily due to a combination of higher levels of average 
drawn debt (including the utilisation of the Group’s new 
£250 million term loan), which was used to fund both our 
recent acquisitions as well capital expenditure on the Group’s 
development and Flex refurbishments, together with higher 
underlying interest rates. 
Capitalised interest increased by £2.5 million to £11.3 million as 
our development activity increased, including the commitments 
to develop French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1 
and Minerva House, SE1 as well as the commencement of a 
growing number of refurbishment schemes to deliver on our 
Flex ambitions, including 141 Wardour Street, W1, Egyptian 
& Dudley House, SW1 and 31/34 Alfred Place, WC1. As a result, 
the Group had net finance costs (including interest receivable) 
of £11.6 million (2023: £5.5 million).
EPRA earnings
EPRA earnings were £17.9 million, 25.4% lower than last year 
as expected, predominantly due to higher finance costs 
and administration expenses offset by increased net rental 
income and lower property costs.
EPRA earnings £m
Increase
Decrease
Total
31 March
2023
24.0
Rental
income
1.2
Joint
venture
fees
(0.7)
Property
costs
3.4
Admin
costs
(4.0)
Net
Interest
(6.1)
0.1
Other
17.9
31 March
2024
0
25
20
15
10
5
30
Revaluation declines in the Group’s investment properties, 
together with reduced EPRA earnings, led to the Group’s  
reported IFRS loss after tax of £307.8 million (2023: £163.9 million).  
Basic and diluted loss per share for the year were both a 121.7 
pence loss, compared with 64.8 pence for 2023. Diluted EPRA 
EPS was 7.1 pence (2023: 9.5 pence), a decrease of 25.3% 
and cash EPS was 1.4 pence (2023: 1.4 pence).
Results of joint ventures
The Group’s net investment in joint ventures decreased 
to £491.3 million at 31 March 2024, down from £538.8 million 
in the previous year. The decrease is largely due to the 10.2% 
like-for-like decrease in value of the joint venture property 
portfolio. Our share of joint venture net rental income was 
£19.4 million, up 6.6% from last year. This increase was primarily  
as a result of completing the leasing of the retail space at 
Hanover Square, W1 in the GHS Partnership.
See more about our joint ventures on page 70
Our capital strength
While our primary objective is to deliver returns consistently 
ahead of our cost of capital, we also seek to minimise the 
cost of our capital through the appropriate mix of equity 
and debt finance, and to ensure that we have access to 
sufficient financial resources to implement our business plans. 
Optimising and flexing the allocation of capital across our 
portfolio, including between our investment and development 
activities, is key to our business and ensuring that we maximise 
returns on a risk-adjusted basis through the property cycle. 
Accordingly, we operate with four key ‘givens’:
	
– conservative leverage to enhance, not drive, returns;
	
– sustainable ordinary dividends;
	
– disciplined capital allocation; and
	
– balance sheet efficiency – track record of accretively 
raising and returning capital.
Our preference for low financial leverage helps to provide 
downside protection when operating in the cyclical central 
London property market and to maintain the financial 
flexibility to allow us to act quickly on new investment 
opportunities as they arise.
Strategic Report – Annual review
31
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our financial results continued
Our capital strength; EPRA LTV of 32.6%
The Group’s consolidated net debt increased to £721.0 million, 
or £738.0 million excluding customer deposits at 31 March 2024, 
compared with £457.7 million at 31 March 2023. The increase was 
largely due to the acquisition of three buildings during the year 
for £122.9 million (excluding costs), together with £142.4 million 
of development and refurbishment capital expenditure 
across the Group. As a result, the Group’s gearing increased 
to 46.8% at 31 March 2024 from 24.0% at 31 March 2023.
Including cash balances in joint ventures, total net debt, 
excluding net liabilities, was £695.3 million (2023: £440.0 million) 
or £713.5 million excluding customer deposits, equivalent to 
an EPRA LTV of 32.6% (2023: 19.8%). At 31 March 2024, we had 
no external debt in any of our joint ventures. At 31 March 2024, 
the Group, including its joint ventures, had unrestricted 
cash (£30.4 million) and undrawn committed credit facilities 
(£603.0 million) totalling £633.4 million.
Debt analysis
March  
2024
March  
2023
Net debt excluding JVs (£m)1
738.0
457.7
Net gearing
46.8%
24.0%
Total net debt including 50%  
JV cash balances (£m)1
713.5
440.0
EPRA LTV
32.6%
19.8%
Interest cover
3.7x
10.2x
Weighted average interest rate
4.3%
2.7%
Weighted average cost of debt
4.1%
3.0%
% of drawn debt fixed/hedged
87%
97%
Cash and undrawn facilities (£m)
633.4
457.0
1.	 Excludes customer deposits.
During the year, to support the delivery of our strategic priorities,  
including funding the Group’s near-term development 
programme and the £175 million private placement debt 
maturity in May 2024, we secured a new £250 million term loan 
at a headline margin of 175 basis points over SONIA with three 
existing relationship banks. The loan has an initial three-year 
term which may be extended to a maximum of five years. 
Given the elevated interest rate environment, and our greater 
weighting to SONIA rates through the drawdown of our 
£250 million loan facility, the Group’s weighted average cost 
of debt for the year, including fees, was 4.1% and its weighted 
average interest rate (excluding fees) was 4.3% up from 
3.0% and 2.7% respectively. At 31 March 2024, our weighted 
average drawn debt maturity was at 3.4 years (31 March 
2023: 6.4 years).
At 31 March 2024, 87% of the Group’s total drawn debt was at 
fixed or hedged rates (2023: 97%). The Group is operating with 
substantial headroom over its debt covenants. At 31 March 2024, 
given our low levels of leverage, property values would have 
to fall a further 34% before covenant breach.
Balance sheet discipline
When considering the appropriate level of financial leverage 
in the business, we apply the same capital discipline that we 
use when making asset-level decisions. Typically, we aim for 
an LTV ratio (see page 161 for calculation) of between 10% and 
35% through the cycle. Additionally, we have a track record of 
accretively raising and returning equity capital to shareholders 
at the appropriate time and in the appropriate circumstances, 
including returning £616 million to shareholders between 
2017 and 2020, following profitable recycling activity. Our key 
considerations when making such capital decisions include:
	
– the market outlook;
	
– opportunities for growth (both capital expenditure 
and acquisitions);
	
– opportunities for profitable recycling activity; and
	
– current and prospective debt ratios (including LTV 
and interest cover).
Taxation
The tax credit in the income statement for the year was 
£nil million (2023: £0.1 million) and the effective tax rate on 
EPRA earnings was 0% (2023: 0%). The majority of the Group’s 
income is tax free as a result of its REIT status, and other 
allowances were available to set against non-REIT profits. 
The Group complied with all relevant REIT tests for the year 
to 31 March 2024.
As a REIT, the majority of rental profits and chargeable 
gains from our property rental business are exempt from UK 
corporation tax, provided we meet a number of conditions, 
including distributing at least 90% of the rental income profits 
of this business (known as Property Income Distributions (PIDs)) 
on an annual basis. These PIDs are then typically treated as 
taxable income in the hands of shareholders. During the year, 
the Group paid £20.0 million of PIDs.
The Group’s REIT exemption does not extend to either profits 
arising from the sale of trading properties or gains arising from 
the sale of investment properties in respect of which a major 
redevelopment has completed within the preceding three 
years (including the sale of 50 Finsbury Square, EC2, which 
completed in February 2023). The Group is otherwise subject 
to corporation tax.
Despite being a REIT, we are subject to a number of other taxes 
and certain sector-specific charges in the same way as non-
REIT companies. During the year, we incurred £10.6 million in 
respect of stamp taxes, section 106 contributions, community 
infrastructure levies, empty rates in respect of vacant space, 
head office rates, employer’s National Insurance and 
irrecoverable VAT.
All entities within the Group are UK tax resident; as our business 
is located wholly in the UK, we consider this to be appropriate. 
The Group maintains an open working relationship with HMRC 
and seeks pre-clearance in respect of complex transactions. 
HMRC regards the Group as ‘low risk’ and maintaining this 
status is a key objective of the Group.
See more about our tax strategy at:  
www.gpe.co.uk/about-us/governance
32
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Ordinary dividends
Given the low yielding nature of London real estate, the Group 
operates a low and progressive ordinary dividend policy, with 
the aim of maintaining average dividend cover of 1.0x through 
the cycle. The Board has recommended a final dividend of 
7.9 pence per share (2023: 7.9 pence) which will be paid, subject 
to shareholder approval, on 8 July 2024 to shareholders on the 
register on 31 May 2024. Approximately half of the final dividend 
will be a REIT PID in respect of the Group’s tax-exempt property 
rental business.
Together with the interim dividend of 4.7 pence per share, 
the total dividend for the year is 12.6 pence per share, 
consistent with the prior 12 months.
Ordinary dividends: 12.6 pence per share 
 
2021
2022
2020
7
13
2024
10
11
12
8
9
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
2023
EPRA performance measures
Measure
Definition of measure
March  
2024
March  
2023
EPRA earnings*
Recurring earnings from core operational activities
£17.9m
£24.0m
EPRA EPS*
EPRA earnings divided by the weighted average number of shares
7.1p
9.5p
Diluted EPRA EPS*
EPRA earnings divided by the diluted weighted average number of shares
7.1p
9.5p
EPRA costs  
(by portfolio value)*
EPRA costs (including direct vacancy costs) divided by market value 
of the portfolio
2.3%
2.2%
EPRA capital  
expenditure*
The Group’s capital expenditure on the portfolio categorised 
between acquisitions, development and on the investment portfolio
£295.0m
£149.3m
EPRA NTA*
Assumes that entities buy and sell assets, thereby crystallising certain 
levels of unavoidable deferred tax. Diluted net assets per share adjusted 
to remove the cumulative fair value movements on interest rate swaps 
and similar instruments, the carrying value of goodwill arising as a result 
of deferred tax and other intangible assets
£1,582.6m
£1,918.6m
EPRA NTA per share*
EPRA NTA assets divided by the number of shares at the balance sheet 
date on a diluted basis
624p
757p
EPRA NDV*
Represents the shareholders’ value under a disposal scenario, where 
deferred tax, financial instruments and certain other adjustments are 
calculated to the full extent of their liability, net of any resulting tax. 
Diluted net assets per share adjusted to remove the impact of goodwill 
arising as a result of deferred tax and fixed interest rate debt
£1,633.7m
£2,002.0m
EPRA NDV per share*
EPRA NDV assets divided by the number of shares at the balance sheet 
date on a diluted basis
644p
790p
EPRA NRV*
Represents the value of net assets on a long-term basis. Assets and 
liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in normal circumstances 
such as the fair value movements on financial derivatives, real estate 
transfer taxes, and deferred taxes on property valuation surpluses 
are therefore excluded
£1,752.7m
£2,092.2m
EPRA NRV per share*
EPRA NRV assets divided by the number of shares at the balance sheet 
date on a diluted basis
691p
826p
EPRA LTV
Debt (including net payables) divided by market value of the property
32.6%
19.8%
EPRA NIY
Annualised rental income based on cash rents passing at the balance 
sheet date less non-recoverable property operating expenses, 
divided by the market value of the property increased by estimated 
purchasers’ costs. See calculation table on page 166
3.2%
2.5%
EPRA ‘topped-up’ NIY
EPRA NIY adjusted to include rental income in rent-free periods 
(or other unexpired lease incentives). See calculation table on page 166
3.4%
3.2%
EPRA vacancy rate
ERV of non-development vacant space as a percentage of ERV 
of the whole portfolio (minus developments). See calculation table 
on page 197
28.4%
20.4%
*	 Audited; reconciliation to IFRS numbers included in note 9 to the financial statements.
 £633m
Cash and undrawn facilities
Strategic Report – Annual review
33
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our portfolio
Our portfolio is exclusively based in central London, 
with the majority located in the West End. Our customers 
are diverse, and their demands and preferences are 
evolving at a rapid pace. As a result, we are committed 
to shaping our products and services to meet these 
changing needs.
Well-located central London portfolio
Our specialist approach requires focus. As a result, we only 
operate in central London. Whilst our origins lie in the West 
End, we recognise that central London is growing, and as it 
grows, new locations will become sought after by customers 
seeking new homes for their businesses. As a result, we remain 
opportunistic and will invest across central London where 
we see both value and opportunities for growth.
See more about our customers on pages 69 and 70
Evolving our products
To succeed, we need to provide our customers with great 
spaces that are flexible, sustainable and beautifully designed, 
offering high quality services to provide an enticing real estate 
experience. To achieve this Customer First approach, and 
meet changing needs and working patterns, we have evolved 
our products to focus on two complementary, overlapping 
activities, and our portfolio is well suited to deliver both:
	
– HQ repositioning – developing larger, best-in-class HQ 
buildings. Growing demand for very high quality, brand 
new space has remained strong and the future supply of 
space remains limited. Today our development programme 
totals 9.7% of the Group’s existing portfolio. This pipeline 
of opportunity provides raw material, often with poor 
sustainability credentials, which we can transform into  
best-in-class spaces designed to let well in their local 
markets, be futureproofed in a rapidly changing world 
and have regard to the wider environment in which 
they are located.
	
– Flex spaces – smaller fitted units, often with higher service 
levels. Customers in our smaller spaces are increasingly 
demanding the provision of flexibility, amenity and service 
provision. Accordingly, we have developed a choice of 
Flex offerings to meet this need. We provide spaces that 
are delivered flexibly on a Fitted or Fully Managed basis, 
making life easier and hassle free. Where the management 
of the space is more intensive, delivered by the desk or room, 
we partner with another provider to meet this demand. 
Our portfolio, with around 80% of our spaces sub-
10,000 sq ft, is perfectly placed to meet this demand.
Both of these business activities are complementary and primed 
for growth. Our on-site HQ development and Flex conversions will 
commit £498 million of capital, delivering 678,300 sq ft of brand 
new space, and we have an ambition to significantly grow our 
Flex offerings to more than one million sq ft in the coming years.
Operational measures
-12.1%
Property valuation decline 
(on a like-for-like basis)
24%
Percentage of portfolio  
in Flex or HQ development 
programme
+56 bps
Outward yield movement
23.5%
Percentage of office portfolio  
in committed Flex offerings
“The rise in global interest rates  
has impacted property yields,  
reducing values. This decline has  
more than offset the positive impact  
of rental growth that we continue  
to capture across our portfolio.”
Hugh Morgan Director of Portfolio Management
Our approach
Our focused business model is based upon 
repositioning properties to unlock their often hidden 
potential. This repositioning relies on having a deep 
understanding of the markets in which we operate, 
to enable us to unearth new opportunities, provide 
spaces that customers demand and develop 
buildings for the customers of tomorrow.
We aim to position our portfolio to maximise 
the opportunity for future growth. As a result, every 
property has a detailed business plan which forecasts 
each and every customer’s future cash flows and, 
using our own assumptions for future movements in 
rents and yields, forecasts the forward look returns 
for the portfolio. If a property’s prospective returns 
do not meet our required investment hurdles, taking 
into account both our cost of capital and the risks, 
typically it is sold.
34
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

100%
Of the portfolio in central London
Valuation declines driven by outward yield shift % 
Rental value growth
0%
Yield shift
Residual
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
5%
3.8%
(8.5)%
(7.4)%
Including rent from pre-lets and leases currently in rent-free 
periods, the adjusted initial yield of the investment portfolio 
at 31 March 2024 was 3.9%, 10 basis points higher than 
the start of the financial year.
Whilst the overall valuation decreased by 12.1% during the year 
on a like-for-like basis, elements of the portfolio continued 
to show greater variation:
	
– the second half performance was down 2.4% significantly 
outperforming the first six months (down 10.3%) with our Flex 
office space reducing in value by 8.2% outperforming the 
Group’s wider office space which fell by 11.8% in value;
	
– retail space underperformed offices falling in value by 13.2% 
resulting from a greater yield expansion of 62 basis points;
	
– including developments, our West End portfolio (-8.4%)
performed better than our rest of London portfolio (-20.7%), 
given a more aggressive yield expansion in the City  
+73 basis points versus +53 basis points for the West End;
	
– newer, higher quality buildings outperformed older assets, 
with those assets with a capital value per sq ft in excess 
of £1,000 per sq ft, reducing in value by 5.5% compared 
to those with a capital value per sq ft of less than £1,000 
per sq ft which reduced by 21.5%; and
	
– buildings with better sustainability credentials outperformed. 
Buildings with an EPC rating of A or B reduced in value 
by 7.0%, outperforming properties with an EPC of C 
or D which fell by 18.2% in the year.
Our joint venture properties fell in value by 10.2% over the year,  
driven by higher investment yields whilst our wholly-owned 
portfolio decreased by 12.6% on a like-for-like basis.
The second half performance (down 2.4% like-for-like) 
indicates both interest rates and property yields are now 
likely around their peak.
Yield driven valuation decline
The valuation of our portfolio, including our share of 
joint ventures, declined over the 12 months by 12.1% on  
a like-for-like basis, to £2,331.2 million at 31 March 2024.
Our portfolio by value – 74% in West End1
37%
North of Oxford Street £870.3m
Rest of West End £849.6m
City £306.7m
Southwark £213.9m
Midtown £90.7m
9%
4%
37%
13%
1.	 Including share of joint ventures.
The key drivers behind the Group’s valuation decrease 
for the year, including joint ventures at share, were:
	
– higher investment yields – given the backdrop of higher 
interest rates, equivalent yields increased by 56 basis points 
(2023: 42 basis points) during the year (office: +54 basis points; 
retail: +62 basis points) reducing valuations. At 31 March 2024, 
the portfolio true equivalent yield was 5.3%;
See more about our markets on pages 21 and 22
	
– rental value growth – the continued demand for our 
best in class spaces has helped increase our rental values. 
Since the start of the financial year we have seen continued 
demand for the best spaces and our rental values increased 
by 3.8% on a like-for-like basis, with our office portfolio 
up by 3.6%, with our Fully Managed offices up even higher 
at 5.2%. ERVs in our retail portfolio increased by 4.4%; 
See more about our markets on pages 21 and 22
	
– developments – the valuation of our committed development 
properties decreased by 28.7% on a like-for-like basis to 
£201.5 million during the period, given development returns 
are more sensitive to movements in investment yields; and
See more about our leasing and Flex activities on pages 26 and 27
	
– portfolio management – we delivered a strong leasing year, 
signing 75 new leases, rent reviews and renewals, with new 
lettings 9.1% ahead of ERV. This secured £25.6 million (our 
share) of annual income, supporting the valuation over the 
year. At 31 March 2024, the portfolio was 10.1% reversionary.
See more about our development activity on pages 23 to 25
Strategic Report – Annual review
35
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our portfolio continued
Portfolio performance
Wholly- 
owned  
£m
Joint
ventures1
£m
Total  
£m
Proportion  
of portfolio  
%
Valuation 
movement  
%
North of Oxford Street
Office
677.3
–
677.3
29.1
(10.5)
Retail
152.3
36.7
189.0
8.1
(11.4)
Residential
4.0
–
4.0
0.2
(13.8)
Rest of West End
Office
218.1
239.2
457.3
19.6
0.6
Retail
127.1
109.5
236.6
10.2
(11.4)
Residential
0.7
–
0.7
–
(26.9)
Total West End
1,179.5
385.4
1,564.9
67.2
(7.8)
City, Midtown and Southwark
Office
340.0
90.7
430.7
18.5
(17.2)
Retail
7.7
–
7.7
0.3
(7.7)
Residential
–
–
–
–
–
Total City, Midtown and Southwark
347.7
90.7
438.4
18.8
(17.0)
Investment property portfolio
1,527.2
476.1
2,003.3
86.0
(10.0)
Development property
201.5
–
201.5
8.6
(28.7)
Total properties held throughout the year
1,728.7
476.1
2,204.8
94.6
(12.1)
Acquisitions
126.4
–
126.4
5.4
(6.6)
Portfolio valuation
1,855.1
476.1
2,331.2
100.0
(11.8)
1.	 GPE share.
Portfolio characteristics
Investment 
properties  
£m
Development 
properties  
£m
Total  
property 
portfolio  
£m
Office  
£m
Retail  
£m
Residential  
£m
Total  
£m
Net 
internal 
area sq ft 
000s
North of Oxford Street
870.3
–
870.3
677.3
189.0
4.0
870.3
760
Rest of West End
804.9
44.7
849.6
560.8
288.1
0.7
849.6
651
Total West End
1,675.2
44.7
1,719.9
1,238.1
477.1
4.7
1,719.9
1,411
City, Midtown and Southwark
454.5
156.8
611.3
600.2
8.6
2.5
611.3
1,319
Total
2,129.7
201.5
2,331.2
1,838.3
485.7
7.2
2,331.2
2,730
By use:
Office
1,684.9
153.4
1,838.3
Retail
440.1
45.6
485.7
Residential
4.7
2.5
7.2
Total
2,129.7
201.5
2,331.2
Net internal area sq ft 000s
2,197
533
2,730
 £2.3bn
 Portfolio valuation
36
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Sustainability
Creating sustainable spaces sits at the heart of our purpose. Whilst the world 
of sustainability can be complicated, our approach is simple and is set out in our 
Sustainability Statement of Intent ‘The Time is Now’.
During the year we…
– Updated ‘Our Roadmap to Net Zero’, we are increasing the ambition of our near-term targets 
and reducing 90% of our footprint, in our commitment to reach net zero by 2040.
– Continued the roll out of ‘Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ to all our HQ developments, 
major and minor refurbishments, as well as on-floor fit-out projects.
– Continued to implement the four pillars of our Sustainability Statement of Intent:
How our sustainability strategy supports our business
Statement of Intent, ‘The Time is Now v2.0’
Sets out the four pillars of our approach to sustainability
Climate resilience
Decarbonise
Our Roadmap to Net Zero v2.0
 Health and wellbeing
Social impact
Social Impact Strategy
www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability
www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability
www.gpe.co.uk/documents/ 
the-time-is-now
Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces
Sets out how we implement the four pillars of our approach as we design, construct, fit out and manage our spaces
Supported by strong governance and reporting
Transparent disclosure through our Annual Report and Sustainability Performance tables
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability/ 
governance-reporting
For TCFD response see pages 52 to 61
www.gpe.co.uk/documents/ 
sustainable-spaces-brief
Integrating 
climate resilience  
across our 
business
See page 40
Decarbonising 
our business to  
become net zero 
by 2040
See page 42
Putting health 
and wellbeing  
front and centre 
See page 48
Creating a lasting 
positive social 
impact in our 
communities
See page 50 
Strategic Report – Annual review
37
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Good governance supports progress on sustainability
Our robust governance structure ensures that appropriate oversight is given to sustainability – 
a strategic imperative at GPE.
Oversight starts with our Board, typically meeting six times 
per year, with regular sustainability updates provided by our 
Chief Executive and Sustainability and Social Impact Director. 
In addition, the Board receives an update on progress towards 
our sustainability strategy as part of the Chief Executive’s 
report at each Board meeting. Three of our Board Committees 
oversee aspects of sustainability-related governance. As a 
member of Executive Committee, our Sustainability and Social 
Impact Director is involved in all key asset-related decisions 
such as acquisitions, development appraisals, lettings and 
disposals. Furthermore, the Sustainability Committee provides 
a forum for management to discuss risks and opportunities and 
potential blockers to progress, while Operational Committees 
work to pre-empt potential challenges that may slow our 
progress. Our Committees ensure wide-scale involvement at 
all levels of the business, supporting a collaborative approach 
to sustainability. More details can be found on page 52 in our 
TCFD response and page 108 in Leadership.
Development Sustainability  
Sub-Committee
Co-Chairs: Martin Quinn & Frank Blande
Sustainable Finance  
Committee
Chair: Nick Sanderson
Management Committees
Portfolio Sustainability  
Sub-Committee
Chair: Janine Cole
Executive Committee
Chair: Toby Courtauld
Sustainability Committee
Chair: Toby Courtauld
Nomination Committee
Chair: Richard Mully
The key objectives of the Nomination 
Committee, which meets five times per 
year, are to regularly review the skills and 
experience of the Board to ensure that it 
is the right size, structure and composition 
taking into account the skills, experience, 
independence, knowledge and diversity of 
Directors and the future strategy of the Group. 
Consideration of these attributes in relation 
to climate resilience and decarbonisation 
is an important part of this process.
Our Development Sustainability  
Sub-Committee reports quarterly to the 
Sustainability Committee, and provides 
operational oversight on climate-related  
risks and opportunities within the development 
pipeline. The key areas of focus are 
embodied carbon, delivery of the circular 
economy and integration of nature-based 
solutions to support both biodiversity 
net gain and climate resilience.
The Chief Executive chairs the Executive 
Committee on a fortnightly basis. Key  
stakeholders including Finance, Legal, 
Leasing, Development, Human Resources, 
Portfolio Management, Flex, Customer 
Experience and Sustainability meet regularly 
to review key strategic and operational 
decisions to be made by the business. This  
includes development appraisals outlining 
embodied carbon and energy intensity 
benchmarks, significant procurement 
decisions outlining the resilience of our 
value chain and Sustainability Strategy.
Audit Committee
Chair: Vicky Jarman
The key objectives for the Audit Committee, 
which meets four times per year, are to 
report to the Board and shareholders on 
the Group’s financial reporting, internal 
control and risk management systems, and 
on the independence and effectiveness of 
the external auditor. Assurance processes 
and internal audit processes connected with 
sustainability and ESG key performance 
indicators are captured within the remit 
of the Audit Committee.
Our Portfolio Sustainability Sub-Committee 
reports quarterly to the Sustainability 
Committee, and provides operational 
oversight on climate-related risks and 
opportunities within the standing portfolio. 
The key area of focus being energy use 
intensity, stranding of assets both from 
a carbon and energy perspective and 
integration of nature-based solutions 
to support both biodiversity net gain 
and climate resilience.
Remuneration Committee
Chair: Emma Woods
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for 
determining the remuneration of the Executive 
Directors and the Chair of the Board, the 
members of the Executive Committee and 
other senior executives. Meeting five times a 
year, the Committee also reviews the broad 
operation of remuneration policy and practices 
for all employees. The recently updated 
bonus scorecard includes KPIs on achieving 
net zero carbon at our developments and 
reducing energy intensity.
The Sustainable Finance Committee was 
formed to manage the Sustainable Finance 
Framework and all Sustainable Debt 
Instruments issued under the Framework.
As no such Sustainable Debt Instruments 
have been issued to date, this Committee was 
not convened during the last financial year.
The Chief Executive chairs the quarterly 
Sustainability Committee meeting, also 
attended by the Chief Financial & Operating 
Officer, Executive Director, Development 
Director, Customer Experience and Flex 
Director, Sustainability and Social Impact 
Director and key department heads. 
This provides strategic oversight on climate 
risk and resilience, reviews the progress and 
evolution of the sustainability strategy, and 
monitors performance against our targets. 
Outcomes from this Committee are brought to 
the attention of the Board by the Chief Executive 
and the Sustainability and Social Impact Director.
Board Committees
Strategic
Operational
Sustainability
Social Impact Committee
Chair: Nick Sanderson
The Chief Financial Operating Officer chairs 
the Social Impact Committee which meets 
on a quarterly basis and reports to the 
Executive Committee every six months.
The Committee has oversight of the social, 
community and charitable endeavours of 
the business in line with the Social Impact 
Strategy. Representatives from HR, Marketing, 
Portfolio Management and Development 
teams attend to ensure collaboration and 
transparency across the organisation in 
relation to social initiatives, charitable 
donations and allocation of budget.
For full TCFD response see pages 52 to 61
38
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Continually adapting and evolving our approach
Roadmap to Net Zero v2.0
Version 2.0 of our Roadmap to Net Zero, released in May 2024, reflects advancing knowledge on net zero, improved clarity 
on the extent of carbon reductions necessary and much less reliance on offsetting. We have increased the ambition of our 
near- and long-term targets, requiring a 90% reduction in our Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to reach net zero carbon by 2040.
Increased near-term ambitions, longer-term targets to 2040
Collaboration is integral to success throughout the value chain
Increasing ambition
The ambition of our net zero target 
has increased to a 90% reduction 
in emissions across Scopes 1, 2 & 
3 by 2040, as compared with our 
previous target of 50% by 2030.
Our absolute emissions reductions 
targets for Scopes 1, 2 and 3, as well 
as embodied carbon and energy 
use intensity reductions required 
by 2030, are also more challenging.
Residual emissions will only be 
treated once we have reduced our 
emissions by 90%, either through 
insetting or offsetting programmes.
To drive faster progress in our Scope 
3 reductions, we have also increased 
our Internal Carbon Price from £95 
per tonne to £150 per tonne and set 
value chain engagement targets.
For further information see page 42 
Customers
We have committed to engaging 
with at least 80% of our top energy 
consuming customers by 2027. 
We have always collaborated with 
our customers but we are now 
formalising that engagement 
through specific requirements 
on sharing sustainability data 
and collaboration.
By formalising that engagement 
we can support our customers in 
achieving their own sustainability 
goals as well as reducing the Scope 3 
carbon emissions of our buildings.
We know that sustainability is 
increasingly a talent retention issue for 
our customers, therefore our spaces 
must reflect the ambition of our 
customers. As well as environmental 
concerns, our customers are 
increasingly addressing wellbeing 
considerations as well as connection 
with the local community.
Decarbonising energy
We must transition our buildings 
away from reliance on fossil fuels. 
Our updated Roadmap includes a 
commitment to remove fossil fuel-
derived energy from our existing 
buildings by 2030.
This requires us to rapidly upscale 
our investment in technologies 
such as heat pumps as well as 
increasing the on-site generation 
of renewable energy.
Whilst 100% of our procured energy is 
already purchased from Renewable 
Energy Guarantees of Origin (REGO)
and Renewable Gas Guarantees 
of Origin (RGGO) -backed tariffs, 
we recognise their validity is being 
challenged. We are reviewing 
our energy procurement policy 
and considering 24/7 matching 
targets for renewable energy 
procured by our business as well 
as a review of Power Purchase 
Agreement options. 
Supply chain partners
We have committed to engaging 
with at least 80% of our supply 
chain partners, by spend, by 2027. 
We are already reaping the benefits 
of collaboration and engagement 
across our development pipeline, 
helping us tackle the challenge 
of embodied carbon. Through our 
revised target we are looking to 
deepen our engagement across 
the whole of our supply chain.
As we evolve towards a more  
service-led, operational model 
within our Fully Managed spaces 
we know that the carbon emissions 
associated with the provision of 
those services and amenities may 
increase. We are partnering with an 
AI-based sustainable procurement 
platform to give us greater 
oversight of how our suppliers 
are already performing to inform 
our engagement programme. 
Defining net zero
In its simplest form, net zero is 
when all emissions released into 
the atmosphere are equal to 
the amount removed.
We have made considerable 
progress on emissions reductions 
since we first set out our Roadmap to 
Net Zero in 2020, however legislative 
frameworks and businesses are 
increasingly converging around a 
science-based approach to net zero.
Following the achievement of 
our original Science Based Target 
in 2023, we are now aligning our 
approach to the SBTi Corporate  
Net-Zero Standard. During the 
next year we will work towards 
SBTi validation of our targets.
For further information see page 42
Communities
In order for our customers, supply 
chain and buildings to be resilient to 
climate change it is essential that we 
work closely with our communities. 
Through our social impact strategy 
we are therefore working with 
organisations that support the 
resilience of our London boroughs. 
This strategy includes:
	
– Reducing the impact of our 
developments on the community, 
for example, our barge servicing 
strategy at our Minerva House, 
SE1, development is substantially 
reducing vehicle movements.
	
– Working with charities that 
are supporting improvements 
to London’s biodiversity.
	
– Working with charities who 
unlock the potential of London’s 
young people.
More detail found on  
pages 41 and 50 to 51
Strategic Report – Annual review
39
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Our performance during the year
In April 2023 we set a number of priorities for the financial year.
Undertake a risk assessment to better understand 
the climate risk embedded within our supply chain
Our highest risks within our supply chain are associated 
with our development activities and the management of 
mechanical and electrical services within our buildings.
During the year, we embedded Our Brief for Sustainable 
Spaces into the business. This has provided a clear framework 
for our supply chain to report their sustainability performance 
and improved the level of focus given to climate resilience 
in their proposals. In particular this has included buildability 
challenges as well as reviewing the availability of materials 
within their own specialist supply chain.
Led by our Head of Projects, we have quarterly roundtables 
with our supply chain partners from across the building life 
cycle. This includes architects, structural engineers, quantity 
surveyors, MEP consultants and contractors. During the year 
these have focused on the availability of cement replacements 
to help lower the embodied carbon of structures, as well as 
investigations into the use and availability of low-carbon 
materials and the implementation of alternative structural 
design. This focus is supporting the improved resilience of 
our developments and carbon reduction.
During the year we retendered our portfolio mechanical and 
electrical services contract, The tender process incorporated 
more sustainability and social impact requirements to 
improve engagement from our service partners on how they 
can support us in delivering more efficient, climate resilient 
buildings. The tender incorporated reward mechanisms for 
innovative approaches to building energy optimisation, 
comfort reporting and life cycle analysis to support a more 
data-driven approach to the maintenance of our portfolio.
Our partnership with Responsibly, an AI-enabled sustainability 
due diligence provider, and Nutral, a sustainable supply chain 
auditor, has improved our understanding of the climate-related 
processes of our supply chain. During the next financial year 
we will continue to work with these businesses to support 
the delivery of our supply chain engagement goal, now 
incorporated within our updated Roadmap to Net Zero.
Create net zero carbon asset plans, informed 
by data from our portfolio metering project
Despite not yet fully formalising net zero carbon transition 
plans for each asset, the findings of the initial phase of this 
work resulted in the implementation of an 18-month portfolio 
wide metering project. This project is nearing its conclusion 
and is already substantially improving the quality and 
granularity of energy data. The completion of this project 
will enable more rapid identification of further energy 
efficiency measures to support us as we respond to tightening 
legislative requirements and increasing customer and investor 
expectations on energy efficiency. Additionally, our improved 
data will be used to create a portal to allow our customers 
to access their energy data when convenient for them. 
This will support them in monitoring their own performance 
In order to become a climate resilient 
business, we are addressing transitional 
climate risk, integrating climate adaptation 
measures into building design and working 
to support the resilience of our customers, 
suppliers and communities.
Our commitments
Our Sustainability Statement of Intent, updated and 
relaunched in May 2023, repositioned our approach to 
climate resilience. A climate resilient business requires a 
net zero carbon pathway to mitigate carbon emissions and 
a climate adaptation plan to support business resilience 
to climate change. We have therefore committed to:
	
– addressing the transitional risk of climate change 
and implementing net zero carbon plans at each asset;
	
– integrating climate adaptation and physical resilience 
measures into our buildings;
	
– working with our supply chain partners to improve 
the resilience of our supply chain; and
	
– supporting the climate resilience of our communities.
Management of climate resilience
Our Sustainability Statement of Intent, Roadmap to 
Net Zero and Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces 
provide a framework (see page 37 for more on our policies 
and strategy) to support us in addressing the transitional 
risks of climate change. This includes the risk of extensive 
policy, legal, technology and market changes to address 
mitigation and adaptation requirements related to climate 
change. Additionally, they provide strategic direction on 
how we will adapt to the physical risks associated with more 
frequent extreme weather events or longer-term shifts 
in precipitation and temperature. A full disclosure on the 
risks and opportunities connected with climate change 
along with our governance arrangements can be found on 
pages 37 to 38 and in our TCFD disclosure on pages 52 to 61.
We are integrating 
climate resilience  
across our business
40
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Supporting the resilience of our communities
As energy costs continue to escalate, the link between the 
climate crisis and social inequality is clearer than ever. In the 
second year of our partnership with National Energy Action, 
we continued to support their ‘Warm Welcome’ in London 
programme. This provided energy saving advice and financial 
support to 95 parents and carers struggling to pay their 
energy bills. We have also continued to prioritise supporting 
community groups who maintain London’s green spaces, 
including Bankside Open Spaces Trust and London Wildlife 
Trust. During the year, alongside our supply partners, we spent 
more than 170 hours volunteering for charities supporting 
climate resilience. See Social Impact on pages 50 to 51.
Through our membership of the Better Buildings Partnership, 
recognising the importance of London’s climate resilience 
to the success of our business, we outlined our experiences 
through the consultation exercise undertaken by the 
Greater London Authority as part of the London Climate 
Resilience Review, We have also participated in the UKGBC 
task group which has brought together experts from across 
the built environment value chain to develop the UK’s 
first shared pathway for adapting to a changing climate.  
Reference: Building layers and their indicative lifespans on page 8  
of GLA CE Statement guidance: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/ 
default/files/circular_economy_statements_lpg_0.pdf
Our progress
Portfolio targeted  
or rated EPC A or B
 63.6%
compared to 51% in 2023 due  
to our development pipeline  
and upgrade programme
Increase in  
biodiversity
3.1%
exceeding our year on year  
3% biodiversity net gain target
Embodied  
carbon analysis
100%
third party verified embodied  
carbon analysis for all projects  
over £5 million
Charitable  
volunteering
 170+
hours from GPE and supply partners 
supporting climate resilience of our 
London communities
on emissions reductions. During the next financial year, we will 
be rolling this out across our portfolio and extending to water 
and waste data where systems allow. Due to the complexity 
of the project, some delays have been experienced during 
the digitisation process, however we will be feeding our  
much-improved data into refreshed net zero carbon asset 
plans during the next financial year.
During the year, we also continued our EPC upgrade works, 
looking to further increase the percentage of our buildings 
rated as EPC A or B. With the inclusion of developments, the 
percentage of our portfolio with EPC ratings of B and above 
has increased by 12.9% (by floor area) from last year up to 
63.6%. Due to our business model of repositioning poorly 
performing assets, we do not expect to reach a position 
where 100% of our buildings are rated A or B by 2030.
Create a climate transition plan
Despite not formally delivering a climate transition plan, 
in May 2023 we updated our Sustainability Statement 
of Intent and more recently have updated our Roadmap to 
Net Zero – essentially, these documents set out our detailed 
ambitions and actions to reduce our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. 
Further, our updated TCFD disclosure (see pages 52 to 61) sets 
out the risks posed to our business by climate change and our 
response to those risks. During the next financial year we will 
be bringing these aspects together, as well as undertaking 
an assessment of how we are contributing to the economy- 
wide transition to a lower-carbon economy and our impacts 
and dependencies. We expect to publish this in the final 
quarter of the financial year ending March 2025.
Integrate climate adaptation and resilience 
measures into our buildings
During the year we increased biodiversity net gain across 
the portfolio by 3.1% from the 2023 baseline, through the 
enhancement of existing biodiverse living roofs and new 
planters at Woolyard, SE1, Hanover Square, W1 and The 
Hickman, E1. During the year we also undertook biodiversity 
learning tours to support the understanding of the GPE team 
on biodiversity net gain and benefits of ecosystem services. 
Through design, we are integrating measures such as passive 
solar shading, sustainable drainage systems, including blue 
roofs, and greywater and rainwater harvesting as standard 
to support the climate resilience of our buildings.
By using the ‘Building in Layers’ approach, as highlighted 
opposite, our Soho Square team have been able to fine-
tune their thinking and consider the impacts of climate 
change on items such as structural stability and robustness; 
weatherproofing and detailing; the durability of materials; 
the health, safety and wellbeing of our customers and 
future building users; business continuity; and the capacity 
of building services and suitability of renewable technologies.
Looking forward
	
– We will complete our Transition Plan and launch it 
by 31 March 2025.
	
– Will complete our metering project (scheduled 
to be complete by September 2024) and roll out 
environmental dashboards using real-time data for 
each asset, with access provided to our customers.
	
– We will complete our supply chain risk assessment 
looking at the impact of climate change on 
materials availability.
Skin/Shell
Structure/frame
Space plan/interior
Stuff/contents
3–5 
years
3–40 
years
7–30 
years
30–120 
years
20–60 
years
Services (building)
Strategic Report – Annual review
41
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Our updated Roadmap includes clearer steps to reduce 
our Scope 3 emissions, including value chain targets as well 
as an approach to treatment of residual emissions, ensuring 
that corporate offsetting does not take place until we have 
reduced our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emission by 90% (previously 50%).
To ensure our actions are in line with climate science and 
to avoid following a Roadmap that may not be consistent 
with addressing the climate crisis, we have aligned our 
approach with the current Science Based Targets initiative 
Corporate Net-Zero Standard.
Our steps to net zero by 2040
Reduce our embodied carbon by 52% by 2030
Our progress so far on reducing embodied carbon has 
exceeded our expectations. Our first net zero carbon in 
construction development, in line with the UKGBC Framework 
Definition, was delivered at 50 Finsbury Square in 2023. 
Reductions forecast within our developments currently in design 
indicate a reduction of 44% from our 2020 embodied carbon 
baseline. Whilst these reductions require verification upon 
practical completion in each case, we are now increasing our 
ambition. It is envisaged that by 2040 embodied carbon of our 
developments and refurbishments will need to be less than 
140kgCO2e/m2. This is an enormous challenge. We are therefore 
focusing on the retention and reuse of materials, minimising 
the use of virgin materials and improving design and 
specification at smaller refurbishments and fit out projects. 
Reduce our energy intensity by 47% by 2030
As of 31 March 2024, our energy intensity has reduced by 36% 
compared to our 2016 baseline. We have therefore updated 
our target, looking to reach an energy intensity of 123 kWh/
m2 by 2030 (a 47% reduction). This aligns our energy intensity 
reduction trajectory with the CRREM pathway out to 2030.
We will continue our retrofit programme, implementing energy 
efficiency projects, supported by our metering project and the 
rapid digitisation of our energy data (for further detail see 
page 44). To support faster progress against our targets we 
are also increasing our Internal Carbon Price from £95 per 
tonne to £150 per tonne. This is levied on our Scope 1 and 2 
emissions and the embodied carbon of our developments 
up to practical completion.
It is envisaged that by 2040 our energy intensity will need to be 
less than 70kWh/m2. Substantial technological advancements 
as well as customer and supply chain engagement will 
be necessary to reach this target. Our business model of 
repositioning poorly performing buildings will also add to 
this challenge as we purchase inefficient buildings and 
redevelop them to meet evolving standards. 
Engage with our value chain
The Scope 3 emissions from our value chain amount to 79% 
of our carbon footprint. Whilst we have always engaged with 
our supply chain and our customers on sustainability we have 
now formally set a target to engage with 80% of our customers 
by energy consumption and to provide real-time energy data 
to 100% of our customers by 2027, supporting behavioural 
energy reductions. Within our supply chain we have set a 
target to engage with 80% of our supply chain and service 
partners, excluding principal contractors (who we already 
engage closely with on embodied carbon). Additionally, we 
are committed to developing a baseline and benchmarking 
Our Roadmap to Net Zero v2.0 sets out in 
detail how we will decarbonise our business, 
reducing our emissions by 90% by 2040. 
The updated Roadmap incorporates our 
approach to reducing embodied carbon and 
energy intensity, value chain engagement 
and decarbonising our energy procurement.
Our commitments
Our Roadmap to Net Zero, relaunched in May 2024, has 
updated our approach to decarbonisation in light of our 
changing business and evolving definitions of net zero. 
We have increased the ambition and scope of our Roadmap 
in a number of areas, as well as adding new targets to 
support our overall decarbonisation journey, We will:
	
– reduce our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 42% by 2030 
and by 90% by 2040 to become net zero (when compared 
to our 2023 baseline).
	
– reduce energy intensity by 47% (previously 40%) across 
our occupied portfolio by 2030 (when compared to 
our 2016 baseline).
	
– reduce our embodied carbon by 52% (previously 40%) 
by 2030 across our new build developments and major 
refurbishments (when compared to our 2020 baseline).
	
– engage with the top 80% of our customers (by energy 
consumed) and the top 80% of our supply chain partners 
(by spend) by 2027.
	
– remove fossil fuel derived energy from across our portfolio 
by 2030.
	
– offset, only once we have achieved a 90% reduction across 
all scopes, the total residual carbon to reach net zero.
Evolution of our approach
Climate change is the biggest long-term challenge we 
face and, as the risk and need for urgent action increases, 
the climate crisis has become both a moral and economic 
imperative. With the built environment contributing 
approximately 40% of global carbon emissions, our industry 
faces a huge challenge as it moves to decarbonising the 
whole building life cycle.
Last year we updated our Sustainability Statement of Intent 
‘The Time is Now’, setting out our ambitious sustainability vision. 
This year we have updated Our Roadmap to Net Zero, increasing 
the ambition of our short-term targets to 2030 and the 
interventions that will be necessary before we reach net zero 
in 2040 after reducing 90% of our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
We are decarbonising 
our business to become 
net zero by 2040
42
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Energy intensity  
reduction
 36%
when compared  
to our 2016 baseline
Revised Roadmap  
to Net Zero
 2040
covering Scope 1, 2 and 3  
at 90% reduction
Carbon intensity  
reduction
 66.3%
when compared  
to our 2016 baseline
Decarbonisation  
Fund contribution
 £338k
from the application of our internal 
carbon price to embodied carbon 
and operational emissions
Looking forward
	
– We will roll out our revised Roadmap to Net Zero.
	
– We will implement the findings of our energy 
procurement review.
	
– We will commence our formal value chain 
engagement programme.
	
– We will identify further opportunities to make 
energy efficiency savings through the delivery 
of our metering project across our portfolio.
Our performance during the year
In addition to the update to our Roadmap we also set 
out a number of priorities for this financial year.
Continue implementation of NABERS UK Design 
for Performance and Energy for Offices
During the year we achieved a 5 star design stage rating 
for 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, and achieved a 3 star 
rating for Elm Yard, WC1, under the Energy for Offices 
NABERS scheme. The NABERS specification has been used 
as a blueprint for our metering project, standardisation 
of plant run times and other systems improvements.
Set out our carbon offsetting strategy
At the start of the financial year, we had envisaged that we 
would set out a comprehensive carbon offsetting strategy. 
Instead we have updated Our Roadmap to Net Zero with 
residual emissions being treated once we have reduced 
our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 90%.
Implement the requirements of ‘Our Brief for 
Creating Sustainable Spaces’.
Since the completion of our first net zero carbon building 
at 50 Finsbury Square, EC2, we are taking the best practice 
and lessons learned across all development projects. 
At 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, we are incorporating the 
principles of the circular economy, including the dismantling 
and reuse of over 1,500 tonnes of structural steel during 
demolition. Through early stage contractor involvement, 
collaboration with materials manufacturers and innovative 
thinking, we are maximising the use of lower-carbon materials 
and materials with greater recycled content.
Use our metering project to identify further 
opportunities to make energy efficiency savings
We expect to complete our metering project during the 
summer. Once complete, we will have much-improved granular 
data to support further energy efficiency improvements.
tool to understand customer ambitions on sustainability, 
and progress made by our service partners in achieving 
their targets. By 2040 we hope to see this engagement 
mean that all of our customers and supply partners have 
verified science-based targets.
Decarbonise our energy consumption
Whilst we have consistently ensured that the energy we 
procure is REGO backed or RGGO backed in the case of our 
gas supplies, we are cognisant of the lack of transparency in 
the REGO market. Whilst we remain committed to installing 
renewable energy supplies at our properties, this is often 
not practical at existing buildings, where there may not be 
space. We have therefore made slow progress towards our 
on-site renewable energy generation target. We are therefore 
removing this target, in order to commit to the removal of all 
fossil fuel derived energy from our buildings by 2030. We are 
also embarking on a comprehensive review of our energy 
procurement policy, including the review of power purchase 
agreements and a target of 60% hourly matching of renewable 
energy purchased by 2030, rising to 80% by 2040.
Residual emissions strategy
In our original Roadmap we had expected to reduce 
our emissions by 50% by 2030 and then offset to net zero. 
However, the offsetting of residual emissions has become 
an increasingly complex issue with projects being called 
into question and some doing more harm than good. We  
are therefore increasing the scope of emissions reductions 
needed to reach net zero, committing to reducing our 
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 90% by 2040. Our increased 
Internal Carbon Price of £150 per tonne will be used in the 
intervening period to invest in the decarbonisation of our 
value chain, supporting energy efficiency projects at our 
projects and investment into alternative materials and 
construction techniques. Offsetting is likely to remain part 
of our strategy at asset level, aligning with the emerging 
Net Zero Carbon Building Standard.
Working towards 2040
To meet the emissions reductions outlined above we will 
need substantial technological advances, including industry 
wide roll-out of materials passports and materials exchange 
platforms to turbocharge the wider adoption of the principles 
of the circular economy. In 2040, when we offset the remaining 
10% of our emissions, we expect to invest in natural carbon 
capture and storage and local projects where carbon credits 
can be used to deliver a positive social impact.
Our progress
Strategic Report – Annual review
43
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR)
Total carbon footprint
Year ended 31 March
2023/24
tCO2e
2022/23
tCO2e
Scope 1 emissionsA
1,255
1,556
Scope 2 emissionsA
2,092
2,221
Scope 3 emissions
Category 1 – Purchased goods and services
7,674
7,055
Category 2 – Capital goods
10,814
9,501
Category 3 – Fuel and energy-related activities
2,095
2,232
Category 4 – Upstream transportation and distribution
38
25
Category 5 – Waste generated (operations and development)
44
37
Category 6 – Business travel
59
91
Category 7 – Employee commuting
69
73
Category 11 – Use of sold products
872
3,272
Category 12 – End-of-life treatment of sold products
4
45
Category 13 – Downstream leased assetsA
6,090
6,0821
Total Scope 3 emissions
27,759
28,413
Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions
31,106
32,190
A	 Metrics with independent limited assurance provided by PwC in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE3000).
1.	 2022/23 figures have been restated to reflect improved data quality and coverage for Downstream leased assets – Customer Procured Electricity.  
NB Scope 3 Category 8 (upstream leased assets), 9 (downstream transportation and distribution), 10 (processing of sold products), 14 (franchises)  
and category 15 (investments) are excluded from the footprint as per our Basis of Reporting due to not being applicable to the business.
Energy performance
We saw a 7% reduction in total energy consumption during 
the year. The reduction was partly driven by reductions in 
energy consumption for landlord areas, as electricity sub-
metered to our customers remained largely level year on year. 
Direct electricity consumption for landlord-controlled common 
parts reduced by 12%, and gas consumption for shared 
services reduced by 11%.
This year, we outperformed our energy intensity target by 
achieving 150 kWh/m2, against a benchmark of 191 kWh/m2 
and a stretch target of 174 kWh/m2. Compared with last year, 
our energy intensity dropped 6% from 158 kWh/m2. A 36% 
reduction in energy intensity has been achieved when 
compared with our 2016 baseline.
Due to further investment in energy efficiency and building 
optimisation, there was a 13% reduction during the reporting 
year in whole building electricity and gas consumption at our 
highest energy consuming site, 200 Gray’s Inn Road, WC1.
Further reductions were driven by the movement of some 
smaller buildings out of the operational portfolio into the 
development pipeline in the second half of the period.
Energy efficiency actions
During the reporting year our primary focus has been on rolling 
out our updated metering strategy, delivering improvements to 
accuracy, scope and granularity of our metering infrastructure. 
The project covers electricity, heat and water, building 
management system (BMS) controls and networks, as well as 
gas where applicable for shared services. The strategy has been 
carried out utilising best practice and lessons learned from our 
implementation of the NABERS UK energy rating scheme and 
will drive improved collaboration with our customers on energy 
efficiency improvements to support energy reductions. 
Key energy efficiency actions taken during the reporting 
year include:
	
– optimisation of gas-powered infrastructure to support 
energy and carbon savings, removing out-of-hours hot 
water demand and auxiliary equipment requirements 
leading to 130,000kWh savings annually with an 
immediate return on investment;
	
– installation of solar photovoltaic panels at our Woolyard 
building, projected to save 150,000kWh annually and 
have a return on investment of 2.5 years; 
	
– NABERS UK Energy for Offices readiness assessment and 
certification at Elm Yard, WC1. The building achieved a 3 
star rating, providing great insight into how we can improve 
this building, and others, going forward; and
	
– energy audits to meet legal compliance requirements.
For more detail on our performance see pages 42 and 43
Performance against our Roadmap to Net Zero
As a signatory of the Better Buildings Partnership’s (BBP) Climate 
Commitment, we are required to disclose progress annually 
against our Roadmap to Net Zero. Our carbon footprint and 
narrative on progress during the last year is set out below.
Overall performance
Our total carbon footprint (Scopes 1, 2 and 3) decreased by 3% 
or 1,084tCO2e during the year. We have made positive progress 
where carbon emissions are in our direct control as well as with 
respect to embodied carbon intensity. Absolute embodied 
carbon (capital goods) and emissions related to the products 
and services we procure have increased in the year, driven 
by an increase in development activity and shift towards our 
Fully Managed product. It is likely that in the short term these 
absolute numbers will continue to rise as we seek to improve 
data granularity and collection processes. 
Scope 1 and 2 emissions
Our Scope 1 and 2 (location-based) emissions decreased 
by 11% or 430tCO2e compared with last year. This decrease 
was driven, in part, by energy the efficiency projects and 
portfolio changes, as detailed in the section above.
44
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Indirect energy-related Scope 3 emissions
Our Scope 3 emissions from customer electricity (both sub-
metered and directly procured by customers) reduced by 9tCO2e 
compared with last year. Engaging our customers to continue 
to reduce energy consumption is going to be critical for us to 
meet our net zero carbon ambitions, as these cover Scope 3 
emissions from customer energy usage. This requirement is 
now incorporated within our updated Roadmap to Net Zero.
Indirect non energy-related Scope 3 emissions
The majority, 89%, of our carbon emissions fall outside our 
direct control and form our Scope 3 emissions; these are emitted 
through our value chain – customers and supply partners.
The 2.3% reduction in our total Scope 3 carbon emissions for 
the year was driven primarily by our asset disposals, equating 
to lower use, and end-of-life treatment, of sold products. 
During the reporting period, although we did not complete 
any major developments, our construction activity increased in 
the year with projects such as 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, and 
others, such as 6 St Andrew Street, EC4, Alfred Place, WC1, and 
Minerva House, SE1, starting development activities. Our on 
floor refurbishment work has also increased in line with our 
Flex ambition. As such, has led to a 17% increase in absolute 
embodied carbon emissions. Our Carbon Measurement 
Framework continues to support consistency in reporting 
and will be adopted across all development activities in 
the coming year.
Emissions from corporate business travel and employee 
commuting have decreased after a year in which travel picked 
up post-COVID. Taken together, business travel, employee 
commuting and working from home emissions have decreased 
by 23% compared with last year. This is also due to an increase 
in the use of virtual meetings and utilisation of our Head Office 
to facilitate face-to-face collaboration.
Emissions from operational procurement, including maintenance 
and repair materials and services, have remained steady 
as a proportion of our footprint. The increase of 5% this year 
compared to last is due to greater spend in more carbon 
intensive procurement categories, again highlighting how 
integral supplier engagement is to ensure procurement 
decisions include carbon considerations alongside cost.
Carbon footprint progress annual carbon emissions (tCO2e)1
6,053
5,070
4,894
7,139
4,289
309
3,095
19,726
5,669
6,973
4,681 93
12,410
29,826
3,777
6,082
9,744
164
12,423
32,190
3,347
6,090
11,370 127
10,172
31,106
7,136
11,405
424
2,418
26,453
9,320
17,921
Scope 1 & 2: Owner generated energy emissions
Scope 3: Occupier generated energy emissions
Scope 3: Embodied carbon emissions from development activities
Scope 3: Corporate emissions
Scope 3: Other (non-energy) emissions from investment portfolio
Roadmap target2
45,000
0
9,000
18,000
27,000
36,000
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2024
8,780
42,442
368
13.6k
During 2023/24 we participated in:
We are signatories of:
Longer-term performance
In Our Roadmap to Net Zero v2.0, we set out our ambition to 
reduce Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 42% by 2030 and 90% 
by 2040 from our 2023 baseline. The graph below shows our 
progress to date since 2019. This demonstrates the need to 
monitor performance towards net zero over the longer term, 
as our normal cycle of business activity, such as our decision 
to sell or develop assets, will inevitably cause fluctuations in 
emissions. Our overriding aim must be to decouple the growth 
and economic performance of our business with our carbon 
footprint. Over the next year we will embed our Roadmap v2.0 
ambitions and incorporate our refreshed approach in a robust 
and transparent transition plan.
Further information
Our full Sustainability Performance tables, aligned with 
EPRA Sustainability Best Practice Recommendations and 
SASB Real Estate indicators, can be found at www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability/governance-reporting. This includes more 
extensive detail on our emissions and our Basis of Reporting. 
We have also disclosed our performance to numerous 
organisations and external benchmarks and are signatories 
to relevant commitments detailed below.
1.	 2022/23 data restated for Downstream Leased Assets – Customer Procured.
2.	 2030 target aim from Roadmap to Net Zero v2.0.
Strategic Report – Annual review
45
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our SECR disclosure presents our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across Scope 1, 2 and select 3 metrics and associated 
energy use, together with an appropriate intensity metric, as required by the Large and Medium-Sized Companies and Groups 
(Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (as amended). Our complete Scope 3 disclosure can be found on page 44.
Energy consumption
Year ended 31 March
Unit
2023/24A
2022/23
YoY  
% change
Energy 
consumption1,2
Gas used for shared services in managed portfolio
(kWh)
6,514,198
7,325,541
-11%
Landlord purchased electricity used in common parts areas 
for the managed portfolio
(kWh)
10,103,847
11,486,161
-12%
Landlord procured electricity sub-metered to customers
(kWh)
17,662,321
17,915,413
-1%
Total absolute energy use
(kWh)
34,280,366
36,727,115
-7%
Absolute energy 
intensity4
Landlord purchased energy used for common parts areas 
and electricity sub-metered to customers (Scope 1, 2 and 3)  
across the portfolio divided by normalised floor area
(kWh/m2)
150
158
-6%
GHG emissions
Absolute Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas emissions
Unit 
2023/24A
2022/23
YoY  
% change
Scope 1  
emissions
Emissions from the combustion of fuel:  
gas used for shared services in managed portfolio
(tCO2e)
1,192
1,337
-11%
Emissions from operations of facilities:  
fugitive emissions from refrigerant losses
(tCO2e)
63
219
-71%
Total Scope 1 emissions
(tCO2e)
1,255
1,556
-19%
Scope 2  
emissions
Emission from the purchase of electricity used in common 
parts areas for the managed portfolio (location-based)
(tCO2e)
2,092
2,221
-6%
Emission from the purchase of electricity used in common 
parts areas for the managed portfolio (market-based)2
(tCO2e)
0
0
-%
Total Scope 2 emissions
(tCO2e)
2,092
2,221
-6%
Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions (location-based)
(tCO2e)
3,347
3,777
-11%
Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions (market-based)
(tCO2e)
1,255
1,556
-19%
Emissions intensity Scope 1 and 2 (location-based)
(tCO2e/m2)
0.0516
0.0593
-13%
Scope 3  
emissions
Category 13: Emissions from landlord purchased 
electricity sub-metered to customers
(tCO2e)
3,657
3,464
6%
Total energy-related Scope 1 (incl. fugitive emissions 
from refrigerant losses), 2 and select Scope 3 emissions
(tCO2e)
7,004
7,242
-3%
Absolute 
emissions 
intensity3
Emissions from landlord purchased energy used for 
common parts areas and electricity sub-metered 
to customers (Scope 1, 2 and 3) across the portfolio 
divided by normalised floor area
(tCO2e/m2)
0.0303
0.0303
0%
A	 Metrics with independent limited assurance provided by PwC in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE3000).
1.	 As a business 100% focused on central London, all energy is consumed in the UK.
2.	 100% of purchased electricity is REGO-backed and 100% of purchased gas is biogas/carbon offset gas. More detail can be found in our Basis of Reporting.
3.	 The intensity metrics include energy-related building emissions (location-based), excluding customer-procured energy. Floor area is an appropriate 
intensity metric as it directly relates to our business activities.
NB Numbers in this section may appear different to the Sustainability Performance tables due to rounding treatment.
Sustainability continued
Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) continued
Our methodology
Emissions are calculated using the UK Government’s 
Environmental Reporting Guidelines and the Greenhouse Gas 
Protocol. We have used the operational control approach for 
consolidating our GHG emissions; included in this are emissions 
and energy usage from our managed properties (including 100% 
of emissions from joint venture properties) and head office usage. 
Where we have purchased electricity, which is sub-metered 
to customers, this is itemised separately under our Scope 3 
emissions, but is included within our energy intensity target.
Our full Sustainability Performance tables, including more  
extensive reporting on our emissions aligned with EPRA 
Sustainability Best Practice Recommendations and SASB 
Real Estate indicators, can be found at www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability/governance-reporting
Independent limited assurance
PwC LLP has provided independent limited assurance over the 
published metrics identified by ‘A’ in the SECR, and supporting 
performance tables, in accordance with the International 
Standard on Assurance Engagements ISAE3000 and ISAE3410.
PwC’s full unqualified Assurance Statement, together 
with our Basis of Reporting, can be found on our website at 
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability/governance-reporting
ESG-linked Revolving Credit Facility (RCF)
Our updated Roadmap to Net Zero includes more ambitious 
short-term targets. We have aligned our RCF requirements, 
in partnership with our lenders, to these new ambitions. 
The table opposite outlines our performance against the 
final year of the existing RCF targets.
46
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

KPI 1
Reduction in energy consumption
KPI 2
Reduction in carbon impact
KPI 3
Increase in biodiversity
In line with our 40% reduction in energy 
intensity by 2030 target set out in Our 
Roadmap to Net Zero v1.0, our RCF KPI is 
to reduce our portfolio energy intensity 
(kWh per m2) by 25.5% by 2026. When 
compared with our 2016 baseline of 
234 kWh/m2.
This target applies to energy consumed 
within our portfolio and to all energy 
purchased by GPE, including electricity  
sub-metered to our customers.
In line with our 40% reduction in the embodied 
carbon of our developments by 2030 target 
set out in Our Roadmap to Net Zero v1.0, 
our RCF KPI is to reduce our embodied 
carbon of completed projects by 25% by 2026. 
This is measured against a 2020 baseline 
of 954kg CO2e per m2.
This target is tested at each design 
phase from RIBA Stage 3, and again at 
practical completion to verify reductions. 
Embodied carbon reviews are undertaken 
by an independent consultant, in line with 
the RICS professional statement.
We are committed to delivering an 
increase in biodiversity net gain across 
our buildings.
Our KPI requires us to achieve at least 
a 3% uplift in biodiversity net gain each 
year on a like-for-like basis.
Target
For March 2024, the RCF target was 
an energy intensity reduction of 18.5%  
(191 kWh/m²), when compared with 
our 2016 baseline.
Target
For March 2024, we targeted a 20% 
reduction in embodied carbon against 
our 2020 baseline for all developments 
in design or construction phase.
A 15% reduction was targeted for buildings 
reaching practical completion in 2024.
Target
For March 2024, we targeted a 3% 
increase in biodiversity net gain 
across our existing portfolio on  
a like-for-like basis.
Achievement
For the year ended March 2024 we 
achieved a reduction in energy intensity 
of 36% (150 kWh/m²) when compared  
with our 2016 baseline.
This reduction was delivered through the 
investment in energy saving initiatives 
undertaken during the last two years, 
particularly at our most energy intensive 
site, 200 Gray’s Inn Road, W1.
Achievement
We achieved an average reduction of 44% 
for the seven projects in scope, which included 
2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, 6 St Andrew 
Street, EC4, Egyptian & Dudley House, 
W1, Alfred Place, WC1, 141 Wardour St, W1, 
Minerva House, SE1 and French Railways 
House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1.
There were no projects in scope for 
practical completion.
Achievement
For the year ended March 2024, we 
achieved a 3.1% uplift in biodiversity 
net gain across our portfolio.
This increase was driven by a living  
roof retrofit at Woolyard, SE1,  
the installation of a green wall at  
45 Mortimer Street, W1 and the  
installation of a green roof at  
New City Court, SE1.
Three long term sustainability KPIs are integrated into our ESG linked RCF.
EPC ratings: percentage of portfolio (by sq ft)
B
E
C
A
0
40
G
F
D
15
35
30
25
20
5
10
Current managed portfolio EPCs
Current FRI EPCs
Targeted under development EPCs
18.2
17.7
0.2
1.4
0.8
2.0
Uncertified
0.1
7.3
23.4
9.0
5.6
1.9
12.4
0
0
Energy Performance Certification
Our portfolio is fully compliant with 2023 EPC legislation, 
(no F or G rated space). A greater proportion of our floor area 
now sits in our Development Pipeline and as such targeted 
A or B space has increased to 23.8% (2023: 7.3%).
During the year, our managed and FRI properties that are 
EPC A or B rated decreased to 40%A (2023: 43%) and the amount 
of unrated space increased to 2%A (2023: 1%). Both of these 
changes are due to our acquisition of the Soho Square Estate. 
However, overall managed and targeted floor area at EPC A 
or B has increased from 50.7% to 63.6%.
In 2022, we estimated that the cost to get our portfolio 
to EPC B and above would be approximately £23 million. 
As we continue to acquire new assets for repositioning, 
and revisit a number of existing properties after the changes 
to the EPC methodology, we will review this estimate during 
the forthcoming year as part of our transition plan and 
double materiality exercise.
Strategic Report – Annual review
47
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
As part of that focus we have taken part in a study led by 
researchers at the Institute of Sustainability Leadership, 
University of Cambridge, to provide our experience of 
exploring opportunities to deliver sustainable coworking 
spaces that improve inclusivity, and the wellbeing experience 
of a more diverse range of users.
The purpose of the research is to explore the inclusivity 
and wellbeing criteria of flexible and coworking spaces to 
understand how accessible they are, and how designs might 
be adapted to help ensure that they are made available to as 
wide a range of users as possible. We hope to use the findings 
of the research which are of particular importance to us 
at GPE as we continue the expansion of our Fully Managed 
product and the diversity of customers that are looking 
for inclusive office space.
Ensuring improved air quality across  
our portfolio and communities
At our development Minerva House, SE1, our supply chain 
partner, GPS Marine, has confirmed it is the first private 
development on the River Thames to utilise a barge to remove 
materials from site. The utilisation of the barge is reducing 
the impact of the development on local stakeholders such as 
Southwark Cathedral and Borough Market, as well as local 
community residents. We are working with partners Morrisroe 
and Multiplex to deliver the project.
Our retrofit strategy aims to maintain over 70% of the existing 
building by retaining the structure and façade. By utilising 
the barge for construction logistics, we are reducing the 
total number of heavy goods vehicles that will travel to and 
from the local area during the deconstruction phase. With the 
River Thames acting as the primary route of transport, the 
barge provides an alternative route to remove waste in an 
area with very high footfall, as well as reducing noise and 
air pollution in a congested, pedestrian heavy environment.
Monitoring and managing the health 
and wellbeing of our customers
By implementing an effective monitoring regime we are 
able to quantify a number of different measures. These include 
air quality, temperature and noise levels, To support these 
quantifiable metrics we also need to understand how these 
impact on our customers in a qualitative sense. We therefore 
regularly undertake surveys to seek feedback from our 
customers and include questions in connection with the health 
and wellbeing of their employees. This includes a review of how 
our amenity spaces and outside spaces benefit our customers, 
and this data is being fed back into our design process.
A sustainable building should also contribute 
to the wellbeing of our customers and 
the local community, supporting healthier, 
happier and more productive lives.
Our commitments
The role our buildings play in the wellbeing of not only their 
users, but the communities that surround them, should not 
be underestimated. A sustainable building must have health 
and wellbeing front and centre. We are integrating wellbeing 
considerations into the design of our spaces, supporting 
improvements in external air quality across our portfolio 
and the communities in which we operate. Furthermore, we 
are improving our internal spaces to enhance our customers’ 
experience and promoting initiatives that support the health 
and wellbeing of our people, customers and service partners.
Management of health and wellbeing
Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces ensures that 
our buildings are designed to enable the achievement 
of wellbeing ratings, such as the WELL Building Standard 
or the Fitwel rating. It also brings together our focus on 
creating biodiverse outdoor space for our customers 
to promote social interaction and access to nature.
The delivery of these accreditations is achieved through 
effective stakeholder management with regular feedback 
provided on key challenges and progress made.
Our performance during the year
In April 2023 we set a number of priorities for the financial year.
Integrating wellbeing into the design 
and operation of our spaces
We are constantly looking for ways to better consider the 
implications of the way we design and operate our spaces 
with particular regard to the health and wellbeing of our 
customers and employees.
We are putting  
health and wellbeing 
front and centre
Looking forward
	
– We will continue to deliver increases in biodiversity 
across the portfolio and establish a methodology 
for reporting the ecosystem service benefits.
	
– We will review the integration of wellbeing 
certifications into our internal design briefs, 
ensuring benefits for the customer are paramount.
	
– We will replicate the template of our own Health 
and Wellbeing Employee Impact Group with 
customers and suppliers.
Our progress
Net Promoter Interviews
122
interviews conducted to gather 
customer feedback including on 
the sustainability of spaces
Heavy goods vehicle 
movements avoided
 65%
reduction in HGVs for deconstruction 
phase at Minerva House, SE1
48
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Looking ahead, we will continue to prioritise the safety and 
wellbeing of all individuals within our properties. We continue 
to carry out regular audits under our Health and Safety audit 
programme and conduct leadership tours to reinforce our 
commitment to safety standards.
As we seek to continuously improve, we are undertaking 
a review of our suite of Health and Safety policies and 
procedures in the coming year to ensure they align with 
the latest industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Health and safety accidents by year
Where accidents occur, our goal is to provide assistance and 
foster collaboration within our supply chain. This collaboration 
aims to enhance our understanding and capitalise on 
opportunities for improvement. By doing so, we can proactively 
mitigate future risks and uphold a culture that prioritises the  
wellbeing of all workers, free from blame.
Health & Safety statistics
2023/24
2022/23
2021/22
Enforcement notices  
or fines received
–
–
–
Employees
Work-related  
fatalities (A)
–
–
–
Lost day rate (A)
–
–
–
Injury rate (A)
–
–
0.41
Absentee rate (A)
0.005
0.006
0.005
At our occupied  
buildings
Work-related  
fatalities
–
–
–
Reportable  
injuries/incidents
1
1
1
Minor injuries
3
2
8
At our developments
Work-related  
fatalities
–
–
–
Reportable  
injuries/incidents
1
–
1
Minor injuries
2
–
4
A	 Metrics with independent limited assurance provided by PwC in 
accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 
(ISAE 3000). Further detail can be found in our Basis of Reporting at 
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability/governance-reporting
We are dedicated to creating and maintaining 
safe, healthy and secure environments for our 
communities, our people and our partners. 
We are constantly striving to set the highest 
standards for health and safety in the 
industry and are committed to continuously 
improving our practices and procedures.
We monitor our health and safety performance across our 
portfolio through a set of key performance indicators, which 
help us to track our progress and identify areas for improvement, 
whether that be data granularity or system efficiency. Our  
proactive approach includes regular audits, regular training 
for our employees and supply chain, and a focus on fire 
safety management in line with current legislation.
Recognising the importance of proactive measures in health 
and safety management, we conducted a comprehensive 
training needs analysis in 2023/24 and established a health 
and safety training budget to address identified areas.  
This will be reviewed and maintained at regular intervals.
Additionally, we are proud to announce that we have attained 
Level 3 Disability Confident Leader status, further demonstrating 
our commitment to inclusivity and accessibility.
We will remain focused on fire safety management across 
the portfolio with special attention on our residential buildings 
to ensure compliance with the Building Safety Act 2022.
During the year we have registered our residential buildings 
falling within the scope of the Building Safety Act 2022 
and commenced preparations to gather the necessary 
information for the requisite building safety case reports.
We remain dedicated to proactive health and safety measures, 
inclusive practices, and compliance with evolving legislation.
Providing safe, 
healthy and secure 
environments
Looking forward
	
– We will continue our programme of Health and 
Safety audits and leadership tours with a focus 
on consistency and continuous improvement.
	
– We will further embed our Health & Safety 
Management System and refresh key policies 
and procedures.
	
– We will maintain focus on the Building Safety Act 2022.
Our progress
Disability Confident
 Level 3
Highest level of the UK Government 
scheme, championing equity, 
equality and diversity
Building Safety Act 2022
100%
of buildings registered that fall 
within the scope of the Act
Strategic Report – Annual review
49
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Social value created
2023/24
2022/23
2021/22
2020/21
Total social 
value created
£1,494,000
£1,157,000
£631,000
£620,000
Direct GPE 
contributions 
(cash)
£238,000
£486,000
£215,000
£475,000
Additional 
social value 
created
£1,256,000
£671,000
£416,000
£145,000
Our performance during the year
In April 2023 we set out a number of priorities for the 
financial year:
To better integrate social value within our planning applications
During the year we continued to work on completion of the 
Section 106 agreement for our Minerva House, SE1 development 
and refined the design at French Railways House & 50 Jermyn 
Street, SW1.
Enabling works commenced at Minerva House. Primarily the 
works were serviced by a pontoon on the river to ensure that 
the strip-out of the building did not increase traffic movements 
through an already congested area of south-east London. 
This minimises the impact of the development site on the 
local community. Meanwhile, at French Railways House & 
50 Jermyn Street, SW1 we are maximising biodiversity net gain 
to support improvements to biodiversity in Westminster.
We have long-standing relationships with Bankside 
Open Spaces Trust and Young Westminster Foundation. 
Through both organisations we are supporting employability 
programmes in the planning authorities of Southwark 
and Westminster respectively to support people who may 
have difficulties accessing employment opportunities.
To further support the growth of social enterprises 
across the business, having already established strong 
relationships through our Fully Managed buildings
For social enterprises to build their customer base they need 
access to new audiences. During the year, we worked with our 
service partners to ensure that where pop-up events were 
being organised within our spaces, social enterprises were 
invited to take part in the event. By improving engagement 
with our supply chain on the benefits of supporting social 
enterprises we saw spend increase to £1 million, including 
£822,000 spent through our service partners.
To improve the recording of the social value generated 
by our suppliers and to further integrate social value 
into relationships within our supply chain
During the year, we rolled out our Impact reporting framework 
to our service partners to allow them to record activities 
undertaken by them at our buildings that create social value. 
These activities included NG Bailey employing apprentices 
on GPE sites, payment of the London Living Wage (set by 
the Resolution Foundation annually) to all service partner 
employees working at our buildings and cleaning provided 
by City and Essex free of charge to The Story of Christmas, 
a charity currently occupying space at Carrington House, 
London W1. 
We know that the socially disadvantaged 
members of our communities will be most 
impacted by climate change. We are therefore 
committed to supporting the people and 
communities with whom we work to have 
a better quality of life, whilst also enabling 
a thriving economy for London’s future.
Our commitments
Our Social Impact Strategy, first published in 2021, sets out 
how we will deliver our vision to create at least £10 million 
of social value in our local communities by 2030 and create 
a lasting positive social impact. Through the four pillars of 
our Social Impact Strategy we are contributing to the needs 
of the London boroughs in which we are working.
Enabling  
healthy and  
inclusive 
communities 
Championing  
diverse skills 
and accessible 
employment 
opportunities 
Supporting 
the growth of 
local business 
and social 
enterprise
Connecting  
people  
with urban  
nature 
Management of social impact
Progress against the commitments in our strategy is overseen 
by the Social Impact Committee and is reported periodically 
to the Executive Committee and to the Board. Our Charities 
Network oversees the relationship with our main charity partner, 
XLP, and donations more broadly, including the awarding of 
£15,000 each year to employee nominated charities.
We use the National Social Value Framework (National TOMS 
framework) to measure the social value generated by our 
business. The framework allocates a proxy value for time 
spent or pound invested and is one of the most widely used 
methods for the measurement of social value, including 
by government, local authorities and businesses.
However, social impact is generated in a variety of ways and 
some of these are not easily measured financially. Therefore, 
we try and take a balanced approach between those activities 
that generate the most social value (in our case the donation 
of space to charities) and the broader, long-lasting benefits 
associated with activities such as social enterprise spend 
and time spent on employability and skills programmes. 
Since the launch of our strategy, we have created £3.8 million 
of social value towards our £10 million target.
The majority of our cash donations are made to our charity 
partners. For the year ended March 2024, our charity partners 
were XLP, National Energy Action, Young Westminster 
Foundation and Bankside Open Spaces Trust.
Sustainability continued
We are creating a lasting 
positive social impact  
in our communities
50
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Looking forward
	
– We will implement biodiversity offsetting strategy by 
partnering with local business improvement districts 
(BIDs) and local nature-focused charities.
	
– We will review the appropriateness of our £10 million 
social value goal and whether a monetary target is still 
the right approach.
	
– We will review the Social Impact Strategy in its entirety 
to ensure that it is still relevant to our changing 
business three years after publication.
Our progress
Social value created  
during the year
 £1.5m
GPE created social value (not including 
service partner contributions)
Hours donated to  
charity partner, XLP
1,450
donated by GPE employees  
(target: 240 hours)
Weeks of internships 
provided
 26
through Leonard Cheshire, 
Change 100 programme 
Spend with social 
enterprises
 £187k
direct annual spend with voluntary, 
community & social enterprises (VCSE)
Championing accessible employment opportunities
To promote entry-level roles at GPE and reach a wider, 
more diverse talent pool, we continued our Early Careers 
Programme, hiring two Customer Experience apprentices. 
We also hosted our first work placements through the Leonard 
Cheshire Change 100 programme which led to 26 weeks of 
internships in total, with all interns paid at least the London 
Living Wage. During the year ended March 2024, we hosted 
154 apprenticeship weeks. Additionally, our team reached 
90 young people through Career Workshops.
We also actively advocate for ethical labour practices 
within our supply chain, for example by ensuring all 
people working on our behalf are paid the London Living 
Wage, and by undertaking Labour Practice Audits to help 
eradicate modern slavery.
Working with our customers and service partners 
to create social impact
We recognise that in order to create a lasting positive social 
impact and contribute to improving the resilience of our 
London communities we must work with our customers 
and service partners.
This has included extending the reach of social enterprises 
and our charity partners by supporting their participation in 
building events. Additionally, we are supporting our service 
partners in creating opportunities for early careers including 
apprenticeships, volunteering and work experience. During  
the year, this created an additional £1.3 million of social value.
To develop our biodiversity offsetting strategy to support 
the climate resilience of our communities and delivery 
of nature-based solutions
Recognising the need to support our communities become 
more climate resilient and the positive social impact of 
increasing biodiversity and access to nature, during the year 
we commenced work on a biodiversity offsetting process. 
A KPI of our ESG-linked RCF is to increase biodiversity across 
our portfolio. This is much easier to achieve on our larger 
development sites or at our properties with more extensive 
outside spaces. However, this can be more difficult at smaller 
existing buildings where roofs would need to be strengthened 
to install biodiversity and there are no terraces to install 
planters. In these cases an assessment is undertaken to 
ascertain the likelihood of planting surviving elsewhere on-site, 
or whether it would be more impactful to invest in biodiversity 
in existing community gardens and parks. Whilst we will always 
try and install biodiversity interventions at our properties, 
not least due to the increased resilience of buildings with 
enhanced greening, the mechanism to offset biodiversity has 
now been agreed with an ecologist for those occasions where 
biodiversity offsetting would be a more impactful action.
Other key successes include:
	
– Generating £960,787 of social value through the letting 
of a total of 32,500 sq ft of space to six charities.
	
– Providing 150 skills-based pro bono volunteering hours 
for charities, social enterprises and not-for-profit  
organisations.
	
– The GPE team spending 1,890 hours volunteering.
Delivering impact through charitable partnerships
During the year, we held our biggest ever Community Event, 
with more than 100 of the GPE team taking part in fundraising 
activities. Activities included the National Three Peaks 
Challenge, walking the South Downs Way, tandem skydives 
and a walk through the London Royal Parks and a total of 
£82,000 was raised for XLP. Additionally, groups participated 
in a careers workshop for young people supported by XLP and 
gardening activities with the Wildfowl and Wetland Trust.
We continued to support National Energy Action, funding 
their Warm Welcome initiative in London. The Warm Welcome 
initiative supports new and expectant parents in London 
who are struggling to balance the financial impact of a 
young family and high energy bills. Support is given through 
community advice sessions to families and one-to-one 
advice to vulnerable parents with more complex issues. 
The fund also supports community energy fun days to provide 
interactive energy advice to both children and parents, 
and an emergency hardship fund to provide essential items 
such as blankets, flasks and air fryers to struggling families.
Strategic Report – Annual review
51
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Great Portland Estates plc has, at the time of publication, 
complied with the requirements of LR 9.8.6(8)R by including 
climate-related financial disclosures consistent with the 
TCFD Recommendations and Recommended Disclosures. 
Consideration has also been given to the all sector guidance 
updated in 2021 with regards Strategy: a) and b), and 
Metrics and Targets: a).
Additional supporting information that can be found on  
pages 14 to 17, page 46 in our SECR table (performance) 
and pages 74 to 87 (Our approach to risk). For further 
complimentary information, see www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability/governance-reporting
Governance
Board oversight of climate-related risks 
and opportunities
The Board, typically meet six times annually, has ultimate 
responsibility for oversight of climate and sustainability risks 
and opportunities with a particular focus on the impact 
on our business strategy. Our Governance structure can 
be found on page 38 of this report. During the year:
	
– the Board reviewed the definitive appraisal for the 
Minerva House, SE1, redevelopment including embodied 
carbon impact, use of the barge for servicing and 
payment to the Decarbonisation Fund;
	
– the Board approved the acquisition of the Soho Square 
Estate which included a review of the implications for 
our net zero commitments;
	
– the Board approved the repositioning of our Roadmap to 
Net Zero, recognising progress in reducing carbon emissions, 
evolving definitions of net zero carbon and the need to 
incorporate more of our emissions into our target;
	
– the Audit Committee reviewed findings from the ESG data 
assurance process and outcomes from a sustainability 
internal audit; and
	
– the Remuneration Committee approved new ESG-
linked KPIs for the corporate bonus scorecard.
As climate change and decarbonisation is considered 
a principal risk for the Group, at the half year and year-
end, as part of our robust risk assessment review, the 
Executive Committee, Audit Committee and Board review 
and assess the impact on the business of climate-related 
risks. This process involves consideration of the risks, 
internal controls, emerging risks and ongoing monitoring 
and mitigation of risks. Opportunities connected with 
market transition are also considered.
Risks discussed included EPC and energy performance 
legislation and changes to planning requirements, in particular 
new requirements from Westminster City Council on their 
‘retrofit first’ policy and their new carbon pricing plans. 
The increased costs and availability of materials was also 
considered as well as the climate resilience of our buildings 
in the context of London’s climate resilience.
Opportunities included the approval of costs for the reuse of 
steel from 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, in our French Railways 
House & 50 Jermyn Street development. The appraisal for our 
200 Gray’s Inn Road, WC1, project considered the impact of 
the removal of gas-fired central heating and hot water from 
the building on ability to lease the properties once works 
are complete.
Management’s role in assessing and managing 
climate-related risks and opportunities
Climate-related risks and opportunities are brought 
to the attention of the Board by the Chief Executive and 
Sustainability and Social Impact Director. Where our valuation 
or development projects are impacted by climate-related risks, 
these are reported separately within our Executive Director’s 
reports to the Board.
Regular updates are also provided to our Executive Committee. 
During the year this has included three updates on our Roadmap 
to Net Zero and additional updates from Sustainability and 
Social Impact Committees. More detail on our committee 
structure can be found on page 38 of this report.
The Sustainability and Social Impact Director – a member of 
Executive Committee – and our in-house Sustainability team 
manage the strategic direction and operational management 
of sustainability-related issues. In addition, there are clear 
departmental responsibilities for sustainability including:
	
– Joint Director of Finance – oversight of the ESG-linked  
revolving credit facility (RCF) and Sustainable 
Finance Framework.
	
– Development Director and Director of Projects – integration  
of sustainability across all projects, irrespective of scope; 
asset energy efficiency and the implementation of energy 
efficiency measures.
	
– The Sustainability and Social Impact Director and Executive 
Director – allocation of Decarbonisation Fund to retrofit 
projects, the Executive Director ensures that climate risk is 
considered in acquisition and repositioning of potentially 
stranded assets; this includes monitoring and managing 
the business response to expected legislative changes.
Our strategy
We identify and acquire unloved properties, reposition 
them through lease restructuring, delivery of flexible space, 
refurbishment or redevelopment and then manage for income 
or recycle them. The buildings we develop can be in use for 
up to 60 years; we therefore consider the whole building life 
cycle when reviewing climate-related risks.
Engagement with our stakeholders is fundamental to 
the success of our strategy and understanding their needs 
on sustainability is fundamental to success. This includes the 
provision of assets that are not at risk of stranding due to their 
energy and carbon efficiency and that are resilient to the 
physical impacts of climate change, be that overheating, flash 
flooding or other extreme weather events. We also recognise 
the importance placed on transparency of reporting from 
our investors. The above factors support the attractiveness 
of our buildings to our customers and investors.
Climate-related risks, opportunities,  
and impacts
To assess how various climate change drivers may impact GPE, 
we use the TCFD framework’s categorisation of transition 
and physical climate risks. We consider climate-related 
risks and opportunities over three time horizons: short, 
medium and long term, identified on pages 54 to 59. These  
time horizons follow our Roadmap to Net Zero targets 
and approach to business and asset planning. 
Sustainability continued
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
52
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

In line with our Group risk management policy and approach, 
GPE defines whether a risk or opportunity is ‘principal’ by the 
likelihood of it occurring and the potential impact it may 
have. We consider climate change to be a principal risk to the 
business due to the transitional risks and their potential impact 
on rental values, building valuation and our ability to attract 
and retain customers. Our full approach to defining principal 
risk is found on page 74. Through our risk review process we 
highlighted the following:
	
– the need to update physical climate change modelling, 
through further scenario analysis, on the basis of emerging 
information from the UN Committee on Climate Change;
	
– the need to improve financial modelling on the impact of 
climate change – our metering and energy management 
project is almost complete and will feed into that process 
during the next financial year; and
	
– the need to further increase value chain engagement 
to reduce our Scope 3 emissions; new targets have been 
included within our revised Roadmap to address this risk.
Additionally, we are responding to the transitional risks of 
climate change, specifically upgrading EPC ratings, retrofitting 
existing buildings, removing fossil fuels and aligning with CRREM 
pathways. Our customer requirements on sustainability 
continue to evolve as concepts such as net zero mature; 
this impacts the design of our buildings and the materials 
we use to develop and refurbish them.
This approach is where we see opportunities materialise, 
through the provision of buildings and spaces that are resilient 
to a changing climate, in turn supporting improved rents, 
valuations and speed of letting, Our design briefs and asset 
plans are structured to capitalise on this opportunity.
Physical risks and opportunities
Whilst in the short to medium term, focus remains on 
transitional risks, we see a gradual increase in focus on physical 
risks such as flash flooding and overheating.
In 2019, we conducted physical climate risk modelling using 
four IPCC projections, from a 1.5°C temperature rise (RCP 
2.6) up to 5.4°C (RCP 8.5) and applied a rating to each risk. 
With a central London portfolio the climate-related physical 
risks profile is largely consistent across all our buildings, with 
the exception of flash flooding where quantification is more 
challenging or riverside properties such as Minerva House, 
SE1 (more detail on pages 42 and 62). Following the release 
of the 2023 IPCC Report on Climate Change in March and 
the London Climate Resilience Review at the end of 2023 
we are committed to updating this modelling during the 
next financial year as part of our Transition Plan.
We have updated our Roadmap to Net Zero including our 
energy and carbon targets to 2030 (including our Scope 3 
emissions) as well as introducing long-term targets to 2040. 
We are aligning our new targets with the SBTi Corporate Net-
Zero Standard and therefore remain confident that they are in 
line with 1.5°C. Whilst our previous target was verified by the 
SBTi (SME route), we are yet to complete this process for our 
revised Roadmap and will update publicly once complete.
We recognise that current UN projections suggest that a 2°C 
or 4°C warming scenario is more likely and have therefore 
set out our response to physical and transitional risks in those 
particular scenarios within the tables on pages 54 to 59.
Resilience of organisation’s strategy considering 
different climate-related scenarios
Our strategy enables us to build resilience considerations 
into the acquisition, design, development and operation 
of buildings. We do not believe we will need to change 
our strategy in a 1.5, 2 or 4ºC warming scenario.
We have outlined on pages 54 to 59 the climate-related 
risks and opportunities identified by our business and how 
we are responding to these risks to deliver both business 
resilience and a resilient value chain.
The delivery of actions to reduce our risk has an impact on 
the remuneration of all colleagues through our Annual Bonus 
Scorecard (pages 16 to 17). Reduction in energy consumption 
and net zero carbon developments are intrinsically linked to 
energy savings and Decarbonisation Fund contributions as 
listed in the Metrics and Targets on page 61.
Risk management
In addition to the assessment of the principal and emerging 
risks facing the Group at the half-year and year end, the 
Board Committees and Management Committees, outlined 
on page 38, review the actions taken to help mitigate our 
sustainability related-risks.
During the year this included:
	
– the Audit Committee reviewing the outcome of an Internal 
Audit review of sustainability governance. A key action 
following the review has been the creation of a dashboard of 
all ESG-related KPIs to be presented to the Board regularly;
	
– a decision by the Executive Committee that our Roadmap 
to Net Zero needed to be updated to meet evolving 
definitions of net zero and to respond to our changing 
business, including raising our Internal Carbon Price 
from £95 to £150/tCO2e (more detail can be found on 
pages 42 to 43);
	
– the Sustainability Committee signing off new short-term 
targets on energy intensity and embodied carbon to 
align more closely with CRREM and SBTi guidance;
	
– oversight of our metering project and implementation of 
energy action plans by the Portfolio Sustainability Sub-
Committee, including challenges on the commissioning 
of new meters and transfer of information to our data 
management system;
	
– oversight of sustainability innovation through our 
Development Sustainability Sub-Committee, including 
in relation to the availability and use of alternative 
concrete products and circular economy innovation; and
	
– Design Review meetings considered progress against 
and the applicability of ratings such as BREEAM, SKA 
and NABERS Design for Performance and NABERS UK 
Energy for Performance.
Controls for managing our identified climate-related risks 
and opportunities are outlined on the following pages 54 to 60 
and more broadly, integrated as a principal risk, within the 
‘Our approach to risk’ section on pages 74 to 87.
During the next reporting period we will be carrying out a 
double materiality exercise that will inform our disclosure 
for the year ending 31 March 2025, as well as our Transition 
Plan that will be developed in line with the guidance from 
the Transition Plan Taskforce.
Strategic Report – Annual review
53
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
Climate-related transition and physical risks
Risk
Description
Scenario
Timeframe
Transition risks
 
Policy and legal
Risk 1
Ability to respond to uncertainty on evolving EPC legislation – 
leading to increased costs and the risk of stranded assets.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Short
Risk 2
Increased focus on ‘energy in use ratings’ within the market,  
leading to additional legislative burden.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Short
Risk 3
Evolving local planning requirements including increased 
carbon tariffs leading to increased complexity of developing 
commercial buildings.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Technology
Risk 4
Inefficiencies in building operation caused by outdated utility 
metering, lack of understanding of complex building systems.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Short
Risk 5
Increased costs associated with research and development 
of technological solutions or pace of change is not sufficient 
to respond to scale of challenge.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Market
Risk 6
Volatility in energy market, prices and availability of net zero 
energy tariffs. Energy security concerns leading to increased 
energy costs.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Risk 7
Increased costs of raw materials driven by growing demand 
for sustainable products may impact on ability to reduce 
embodied carbon of future developments.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Risk 8
Increased customer demand for highly sustainable buildings 
may lead to the risk of stranded assets.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Short
Risk 9
Increased cost of development and refurbishment driven 
by increasingly complex planning regime.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Short
Climate change and decarbonisation is considered to be 
a principal risk for GPE and the successful management 
of that risk, along with any associated opportunity, 
is critical for the Group to deliver its strategic priorities.
Our overarching risk management process comprises of 
four main stages: risk identification, risk assessment, risk 
response, and monitoring reporting and escalation. The risks, 
and opportunities, related to climate change are managed 
through that same approach. Risk management is an integral 
part of all business activities, as is consideration of the impact 
of our activities on the long-term performance of the business.
The Groups principal risks have remained largely unchanged 
from the previous reporting period, as is the case with our 
climate-related transition and physical risks that can be 
seen in the following tables. We have taken the opportunity 
to consolidate some of these risks in order to simplify 
our approach to managing them.
Climate change remains a principal risk to the business, with 
a ‘Medium’ net risk rating. We recognise the impact it has over 
our ability to deliver on our strategic priorities and as such we 
endeavour to ensure that the appropriate polices, procedures, 
internal controls and people are in place to help minimise that risk.
54
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Response to risk
Next steps
Review of EPC upgrade costs completed, asset level plans created, 
upgrade works underway, target to remove energy-related fossil fuels 
from all buildings incorporated in Roadmap to Net Zero review.
Portfolio EPC review to be updated as new acquisitions enter portfolio 
and development/refurbishment works complete. Increased focus 
additionally on energy intensity going forward in updated Roadmap.
NABERS UK Design for Performance ratings in progress for developments. 
NABERS UK Energy for offices implemented at two pilot buildings. 
Metering project implemented.
Implement more challenging target on energy intensity, now aligned 
with CRREM. Create net zero asset plans for all properties once 
metering project fully complete.
Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces sets out key requirements 
on energy performance in use, NABERS ratings, metering strategy, 
embodied carbon and circular economy in building design to 
reduce whole life carbon. Internal carbon price has supported 
behavioural change.
As developments that have NABERS accreditation as a deliverable 
get closer to practical completion we are working closely with 
contractors, engineers and our own operational teams to ensure 
delivery of energy use intensity metrics. Implement updated Roadmap 
to Net Zero including commitment to remove fossil fuel derived 
energy consumption.
Cross-portfolio, extensive metering project nearing completion 
to support improved energy consumption data. In turn will support 
identification of energy efficiency opportunities. Digital twin 
technology, energy management software and enhanced building 
management systems rolled out. New MEP service partner with 
clear energy-related KPIs. 
Finalise the portfolio-wide metering project, ensure all data can 
be pulled through to real-time dashboards, provide data directly 
to customers, to support energy reductions. Further integration of 
building information modelling/digital twins and BMS/EMS systems 
to support a more efficient approach in collaboration with new 
MEP service partner. 
Investment in Pi Labs supports innovation and R&D. Active programme 
exploring new materials and technological solutions to energy 
efficiency and construction-related challenges. Progress made 
on digital twin technology and innovation in construction. New MEP 
contract to drive innovation in operation. 
Increase in the internal carbon price will allow Decarbonisation Fund 
to be used for research. Increased focus on innovation and technology 
to improve sustainability outcomes and climate resilience of the business. 
Continue to review approach to digitisation and adoption of technology. 
Energy councils established with customers. Supply chain workshops 
underway to deal with operational energy efficiency challenges. 
100% of energy purchased on net zero carbon tariffs. Procurement 
policy under review. 
Sustainability remains a regular topic of engagement between 
all customer types, Integration of energy and carbon targets into 
service partner KPIs will lead to a performance-led approach. 
Review of renewable energy procurement underway.
Our ‘Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ launched in the 
reporting year including expectations on material specification. 
Development Sustainability Sub-Committee provides oversight 
of sustainable products in use at our developments.
Maintain our quarterly roundtables with quantity surveyors, structural 
engineers etc. to identify alternative solutions for materials that are 
in shorter supply, i.e. GGBS being replaced with calcine clay, reused steel 
products over EAF produced steel.
GPE approach to building acquisition remains the same, taking 
poor performing assets in all regards and turning them into best-
in-class space. Our development and refurbishment programme 
prioritises sustainable design.
Embed new Roadmap to support achievement of CRREM performance 
metrics. Include year of stranding when looking to acquire assets. 
Continue to raise bar across our developments to provide highly 
efficient and sustainable buildings.
The internal carbon price has been in place for three years which 
has driven behavioural change. Our approach to sustainability 
and retrofitting supports successful planning outcomes.
Development and project management teams remain integrated 
into wider industry groups such as the City and Westminster Planning 
Associations. GPE continue to feedback on public policy consultations 
to provide feedback on increasing performance requirements.
Key
Short term
Medium term
Long term
1–5 years  
(2025–2029)
6–10 years  
(2030–2034)
10+ years  
(2035+)
Strategic Report – Annual review
55
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Risk
Description
Scenario
Timeframe
Transition risks continued
Reputation
Risk 10
Ability to meet increasing requirements on sustainability 
disclosure from investors and lenders.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Risk 11
Ability to secure sufficient supplies of sustainable materials 
to meet embodied carbon targets for our developments. 
Delays caused by supply chain or transport interruptions.
2ºC
4ºC
Medium
Short
Risk 12
Potential detrimental impact on reputation of owning 
lower EPC-rated assets.
2ºC
4ºC
Medium
Short
Physical risks
Risk 13
Increased severity of extreme weather events, like flash floods.
2ºC
Medium
Risk 14
Increased annual temperature.
2ºC
Medium
Risk 15
Reduction in precipitation.
2ºC
Medium
Risk 16
Potential water shortages and subsidence within London.
4ºC
Medium/Long
Risk 17
Increased severity of extreme weather events, like flash floods.
4ºC
Medium/Long
Risk 18
Increased annual temperature.
4ºC
Medium/Long
Sustainability continued
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
Climate-related transition and physical risks continued
56
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Response to risk
Next steps
Active investor programme. Sustainability and Social Impact Director 
meets with investors to understand their priorities. Updated Roadmap 
to Net Zero includes alignment with CRREM pathways and Science 
Based Target initiative guidance. 
Remaining close to our own investors with regard to their key ESG drivers 
and requirements, as well as with our audit and assurance partners. 
Focus in FY25 towards transition planning and double materiality.
‘Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ supports longer-term 
planning on embodied carbon. Development Sustainability  
Sub-Committee provides oversight to progress against embodied 
carbon KPIs. Engagement with main contractor partners and 
specialist subcontractors.
Increase in the internal carbon price allows greater scope of investment 
to come from the Decarbonisation Fund, so that all areas of the business, 
and value chain, can benefit. Ongoing innovation programme. 
Roundtables with quantity surveyors, structural engineers to identify 
alternative solutions for materials in short supply. 
EPC reviews to be integrated within asset plans, net zero carbon 
asset plans underway, and delivered alongside metering project. 
New acquisitions quickly enter development pipeline for upgrade.
Ongoing portfolio-wide interventions to support improvements 
in EPC ratings. Continue to take advantage where vacancies arise 
to implement energy efficiency interventions. For new acquisitions, 
ensure EPC upgrade plan and net zero asset plan implemented.
Our Statement of Intent, Roadmap and Social Impact Strategy 
all include requirements for:
	
– increased biodiversity and solar shading, and the support 
of community greening;
	
– drought resistant planting;
	
– use of sustainable drainage systems;
	
– reduced water consumption;
	
– designing of climate resilient buildings that are robust, 
adaptable and have longevity;
	
– working with our supply chain to improve transparency 
of ethical sourcing processes; and
	
– working with our partners to consider impact of extreme 
weather events on our supply chain.
With the release of our updated Roadmap, next steps will include 
aligning our established Statement of Intent and Creating Sustainable 
Spaces Brief to reflect our increased ambition with regard to energy 
use intensity and embodied carbon reductions.
During the next financial year we will be:
	
– updating physical climate change modelling on the basis of 
emerging information from the UN Committee on Climate Change;
	
– improving financial modelling on the impact of climate change, 
our metering and energy management project is almost complete 
and will feed into that process during the next financial year; and,
	
– increasing value chain engagement to reduce our Scope 3 emissions; 
new targets have been included within our revised Roadmap to 
address this risk.
Our ‘Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ outlines key performance 
requirements on incorporating climate resilience in the design of all 
our spaces irrespective of size and scale.
We work with our consultants and project teams to ensure our 
developments are able to meet the evolving requirements of 
planning authorities and customer expectations.
Sustainability considerations are integrated within our acquisition 
process so that we are able to forecast the required improvements 
for assets to mitigate physical risks.
Key
Short term
Medium term
Long term
1–5 years  
(2025–2029)
5–10 years  
(2030–2034)
10+ years  
(2035+)
Strategic Report – Annual review
57
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
Climate-related transition and physical opportunities
Opportunity
Description
Scenario
Time frame
Transition opportunities
Policy and legal
Opp 1
Increasing complexity of regulatory environment may 
present opportunities to acquire lower rated buildings 
(stranded assets) at reduced prices for repositioning.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 2
Proactive response to legislative changes improves 
desirability of GPE assets for customers and investors.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 3
Deep knowledge supports transition of business to a 
‘retrofit first’ approach which is challenging in London 
and technically more difficult.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 4
Potential increased returns and improved valuation 
connected with higher demand for more sustainable space.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Technology
Opp 5
Early adoption of technology supports improved visibility 
and management of utility consumption data and associated 
reduced costs for our customers.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 6
Payback of costs (dependent on energy consumption 
and variable energy costs) likely to be short term and 
will support improved collaboration with customers.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 7
Implementation of new technologies to drive down 
embodied carbon provides opportunity to capitalise 
on customer appetite for net zero carbon buildings.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Medium
Market
Opp 8
Increased collaboration with customers and supply 
chain supporting faster progress on energy efficiency.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 9
Proactive approach to reducing consumption and improving 
energy security, including on-site energy generation, passive 
cooling and connection to local heat and power networks 
supports customer demand for sustainable spaces.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 10
Ability to capitalise on deep knowledge of London market, 
where other developers may not be as well placed to 
navigate complexities.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Reputation
Opp 11
Continued transparency of reporting coupled with frequent 
investor engagement results in increased confidence in 
ability of business to deliver on sustainability goals.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 12
‘Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ supports best 
practice approach to sustainable design irrespective of 
the product.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 13
Early engagement and collaborative relationships with 
supply chain to support early warning of supply issues 
and ability to source alternative solutions.
2ºC
4ºC
Short
Opp 14
Early adoption of innovative approaches to energy 
efficiency and low-carbon construction and materials.
2ºC
4ºC
Medium
Physical opportunities
Opp 15
Potential increase in valuation of buildings that are 
climate resilient and adaptable.
2ºC
Medium
Opp 16
Increased demand for buildings with climate resilience 
measures such as passive cooling, nature-based solutions 
and sustainable urban drainage systems incorporated.
4ºC
Long
58
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Response to opportunity
Next steps
Acquisition programme sought out lower rated buildings to 
reposition into best-in-class space.
Our Investment and acquisition teams continue to review the market 
in areas to find lower rated buildings where an innovative approach to 
redevelop or retrofit could support the creation of new best-in-class space. 
Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces has integrated a number of 
legislative changes from their inception. This has included biodiversity 
net gain, circular economy statements and climate resilience.
As we revise our Roadmap to Net Zero, we are thinking ahead to the 
introduction of further legislation, particularly focusing on retrofit 
policy and more governance around approaches to offsetting.
We have been delivering refurbishment and retrofit projects for 
a number of years and as such have built a strong supporting value 
chain around us, from architects to engineers and contractors.
Learning from our steel reuse initiative between 2 Aldermanbury Square and 
French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street we are continuing to implement 
innovative technological solutions to promote the reuse of materials.
Sustainability is a key aspect of design and research shows that 
higher rated buildings support increased valuations. The net zero 
carbon status of 50 Finsbury Square supported the sale price. 
Priority is therefore continuing to be given to sustainable design 
and achieving the appropriate sustainability ratings. 
We continue to work with our valuers to strengthen the argument for, 
and provide a stronger evidence base on how more sustainable spaces 
drive higher demand and in turn better returns. This has informed our 
newly announced commitment to remove energy-related fossil fuels 
from the portfolio.
Our portfolio wide metering project has greatly improved 
not only the visibility of data for ourselves and our customers 
but also supported greater behavioural-led change and 
performance improvements.
Completion of the metering project and integration of that data into our 
asset dashboards will ensure that our customers have real-time energy 
consumption data for their spaces, allowing us to work together to drive 
building-wide energy performance improvements and reduce costs.
We will be concentrating on the presentation of data through 
dashboards, onboarding a Data Manager into the business, and 
delivering greater Customer First and sustainability integration.
The opportunity to propose new technology has been integrated 
into the CSS brief, and innovations around the delivery of net zero 
carbon buildings are encouraged as below the line solutions in 
our tender process.
We are increasing the scope of the Decarbonisation Fund to our 
development pipeline, allowing for further investment in new technology 
and piloting solutions across development and portfolio.
Energy Councils with our customers are in place, whilst our regular 
roundtables with key members of our supply chain including architects, 
engineers, project managers and other service partners support innovation.
To take this collaboration further we have set public-facing targets 
in our new Roadmap that focus on our engagement with customers 
and supply chain partners.
Our new MEP contract supports increased innovation to reduce 
consumption. Additionally, through our Brief for Creating Sustainable 
Spaces we are supporting innovation. We are currently reviewing 
our energy procurement process to support energy security.
Reflecting on the lessons learned through our early engagement 
with the NABERS UK process we will be able to improve the integration 
of passive measures, as well as focusing on how we procure energy 
to ensure security of supply.
The GPE approach to building acquisition is well established, 
taking poor performing assets in all regards and turning them into  
best-in-class space in concentrated areas of London that we know well.
We continue to remain active participants in groups such as the Westminster 
and City Property Associations, supporting them through our own 
experience of the London market and local planning authority nuances.
Our approach to the disclosure of our data and performance 
has been established over a number of years and this has included 
our annual reporting process as well as third-party disclosures.
Through ongoing review of what we disclose and how we disclose it, 
we are making improvements to the integration of sustainability data 
into our Annual Report and creating a new accessible dataset that 
will be publicly available for download.
Over the last reporting period we have been rolling out the new 
Brief, and the reporting mechanisms that are associated with it. 
Sustainability dashboards and our Development Sustainability  
Sub-Committee provides oversight of progress against KPIs. 
We continue to implement the Brief across all our projects, including on 
floor fit-out projects. Feedback is being incorporated into new projects.
Our approach to collaboration, outside of the confines of the 
contractual environment, have supported much more transparent 
and productive conversations with our supply chain partners.
Following on from the release of our revised Roadmap, and the inclusion 
of formal engagement targets with our supply chain partners on 
sustainability, we will be holding formal workshops to raise awareness 
and foster greater collaboration between our supply chain partners, 
who in some cases will operate in different parts of the built environment.
The opportunity to propose innovative approaches has been 
integrated into our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces and solutions 
around the delivery of net zero carbon buildings are encouraged as 
below the line solutions in our tender process.
We are increasing the scope of the Decarbonisation Fund to our 
development pipeline, allowing for further investment in new 
technology and piloting solutions across development and portfolio.
Our ‘Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ outlines key performance 
requirements on incorporating climate resilience in the design of all 
our spaces irrespective of size and scale.
Being able to identify building-specific risks supports the integration 
of effective resilience measures such as increased flood defence 
being managed at our Minerva, SE1, project.
We will be reviewing our approach to climate risk modelling in the 
coming year to expand upon the work that has already been done 
across the portfolio. This will also include the identification of ways 
in which we can better support our customers, and the communities 
in which we operate, to deal with the physical risks of climate 
change such as accessibility issues and emergency preparedness.
Key
Short term
Medium term
Long term
1–5 years  
(2025–2029)
5–10 years  
(2030–2034)
10+ years  
(2035+)
Strategic Report – Annual review
59
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
Impact on strategy
Linked risks/
opportunities
Impact on financial planning
Operating costs, capital expenditure and allocation
Our Sustainability Statement of Intent, and revised Roadmap 
to Net Zero, set out our sustainability strategy. We have 
refocused our strategy with the aim of ensuring that climate 
resilience is integrated across our business as well as increasing 
our ambition with regard to embodied carbon reduction 
and energy efficiency. We consider climate risk throughout 
our processes, including leasing, customer relationships, 
development appraisals, asset business plans, financing 
arrangements, acquisitions and remuneration arrangements.
Risk:  
1-9, 11-12, 
13-18
Opp:  
1–3, 5–7, 9,  
10, 13–16
Detailed review undertaken to understand the cost of 
improving our portfolio to an EPC B rating. We estimated that 
the cost would be circa £20 million in the current regulatory 
environment and these are works that would have, in any event, 
been incorporated into our work to reposition assets. We are 
undertaking a similar exercise to create an energy intensity 
trajectory to 90 kWh per m2 by 2030 for our new developments 
and a CRREM aligned trajectory across the portfolio. Our 
recently increased Internal Carbon Price to £150 per tonne 
feeds into our Decarbonisation Fund which supports energy 
efficiency improvements.
Access to capital
It is increasingly important to demonstrate how financing 
is linked to ESG considerations. Our Sustainable Finance 
Framework is in place and sets out how we may link future 
debt facilities to our business activities. In addition, our  
ESG-linked RCF incorporates KPIs on energy intensity,  
embodied carbon and biodiversity.
Risk:  
2, 3, 5, 7, 8,  
9, 11, 12–18
Opp:  
1, 2, 4, 7, 10,  
11, 14–16
Throughout the year we have engaged in a number of discussions 
with our lenders, focusing on our ESG-linked revolving credit 
facility as well as a new debt facility negotiated during 
2023 which totals £250m. The updated energy and carbon 
targets included in our Roadmap to Net Zero have now been 
incorporated in both these debt facilities.
Acquisitions and divestments
We seek to acquire assets that are at risk of being stranded 
to refurbish and reposition them. We may also seek to divest 
from assets where it is not possible to upgrade to an EPC 
B rating. When making an acquisition, we undertake due 
diligence on the potential for the asset to reach an EPC B rating 
and net zero carbon. At 50 Finsbury Square we delivered a 
building verified as net zero carbon. This was then incorporated 
within the contract of sale with a financial penalty in the event 
it was not achieved. Our learning from this process coupled 
with our customer engagement process with Clifford Chance at 
2 Aldermanbury Square has been embedded in our processes. 
Risk:  
1, 5, 7, 8, 9,  
11, 13, 14–18
Opp:  
1, 3, 4, 6, 7,  
10, 15, 16
Appraisals for asset acquisitions are considered at a number 
of different levels within the business, particularly at Executive 
Committee and Board meetings. In order to gain sign off for 
these developments the implications on sustainability KPIs 
must be presented for discussion. This includes contributions 
to the Decarbonisation Fund, likely embodied carbon impact 
of development proposals and energy use intensities. In respect 
of divestments (asset disposals) CRREM analysis is completed 
to support the sale of these assets as sellers become more 
mature in the sustainability data they are requesting. The 
sustainability credentials of the building support the valuation. 
Developments
We take a whole life carbon approach to development, 
designing for climate resilience, longevity, and adaptability. 
All buildings in our development pipeline will be fossil fuel free, 
low embodied carbon and energy efficient, with an ambition 
of meeting the Net Zero Carbon Building Standard when it 
is released. Together these credentials support the valuations 
of our buildings. The financial implications of implementing 
this are included within our development appraisals, which 
also include the impact of our Internal Carbon Price. In the 
case of projects such as 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2 where 
we are removing steel to be reused in another development, 
costs can vary due to the complex process of dismantling steel, 
charges for warehousing the steel and impact on programme. 
When taken in combination with reusing the steel at French 
Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street we expect to be cost neutral 
whilst reducing the embodied carbon of the steel used at 
the development by 95%.
Risk:  
2, 3, 5, 6, 8,  
9, 10, 11, 13, 
14–18
Opp:  
1–5, 7–9, 10, 
12, 14–16
Costs related to sustainability innovation at our developments 
are fluctuating as the industry adapts and evolves. Our Internal 
Carbon Price, recently revised to £150 per tonne, is applied at 
practical completion of our developments and incentivises the 
reduction of embodied carbon and supports progress towards 
our short-term embodied carbon reductions.
The ICP is included into the development appraisal process as 
a financial implication and impacts the overall profit on cost as 
a key driver for the business. Our recent exchange of contracts 
for the acquisition of the Courtyard, has £450,000 included 
within its appraisal. In effect this ensures that the embodied 
carbon of design changes is better understood and drives 
commercial decisions on carbon.
Our ‘Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces’ also ensures that 
we set the right design brief for all our spaces.
Managing assets
Our Roadmap to Net Zero sets out how we can reduce energy 
consumption and carbon emissions to reach our near-term 
targets by 2030. Our Internal Carbon Price, recently raised 
to £150 per tonne, is applied to operational carbon emissions, 
with our Decarbonisation Fund supporting ongoing investment 
in energy efficiency projects across our portfolio and now into 
innovation in our developments. Our Sustainability Statement 
of Intent has been updated to reposition climate resilience 
to ensure it is integrated across our business. Our revised Brief 
for Creating Sustainable Spaces further sets out how we will 
ensure that the design of our spaces supports reductions 
in carbon emissions.
Risk:  
1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 
11, 13, 14–18
Opp:  
2–6, 8, 9,  
12, 15, 16
Our Portfolio Managers are ultimately responsible for the long-
term financial performance of our real estate assets. Energy 
performance, climate resilience, biodiversity interventions 
and social value are all monitored as part of our asset business 
planning process. In particular, scheduling energy efficiency 
interventions to support improvements in EPC ratings where 
vacancies arise to reduce the risk of stranding as legislation 
tightens, or the retrofitting of biodiversity interventions to support 
the climate resilience of an asset. The financial implications 
of implementing these actions are presented at quarterly 
asset reviews as part of overall asset performance to support 
better understanding of the impact of improving sustainability 
performance on individual asset financial performance. 
Strategy and financial planning
60
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Metrics and targets
Metrics used to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with strategy  
and risk management processes
Risk adaptation and 
mitigation metrics
Baseline
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
Target
Progress
EPCs rated A and B  
by floor area1
Risk:  
1, 2, 13
Opp:  
1, 2, 3, 15
2016
37%
43%
40%
100%  
by 2030
Compliant with current EPC legislation with plans 
in place to meet potential further EPC legislative 
changes and quarterly asset reviews are 
monitoring progress.
Our acquisition of the Soho Square Estate in the 
period led to a reduction in the overall operational 
floor area % of As and Bs but this will be remedied 
as it transitions to the development pipeline.
Including floor area in development 63.6% of the 
portfolio is meeting or targeting EPC A and B.
EPCs rated F and G  
by floor area
Risk:  
1, 2, 13
Opp:  
1, 2, 3, 15
2016
0%
0%
0%
0%
Proportion of portfolio 
with green building ratings 
by floor area
Risk:  
1, 2, 3, 9, 13, 14–18
Opp:  
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 12, 14–16
2016
55%
48%
44%
60%
Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces provides 
clear governance structure for the delivery 
of green building ratings. The Brief applies to 
all developments, refurbishments and fit outs. 
It includes certifications such as BREEAM, WELL, 
Fitwel, NABERS and SKA ratings. A further 25% 
of the portfolio in development is targeting 
green buildings ratings.
Estimated annual savings 
from energy efficiency 
measures implemented 
during the year
Risk:  
1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 11
Opp:  
4–6, 8, 9, 12, 14
2018 3,777 MWh 3,226 MWh
1,077 MWh
Develop 
target
A greater focus this year has been on upgrading 
metering infrastructure, due for completion in 
the early part of FY25. Buildings completed early 
in the programme are able to utilise automated, 
granular data and dashboards to drive improved 
energy efficiency and optimisation. We anticipate 
we will be able to quantify the savings from 
greater data availability in following disclosures.
Internal Carbon Price
Risk:  
1–10, 14–18
Opp:  
1–7, 12–16
2021
£95
£95
£95
Review 
by end  
of FY27
The ICP is currently applied to Scope 1 and 2 
location based emissions and residual embodied 
carbon emissions from our development pipeline.
It has been updated to £150 per tCO2e in the 
Roadmap v2.0.
Total (to date) contribution 
to Decarbonisation Fund
Risk:  
1–10, 14–18
Opp:  
1–7, 12–16
2022
£403k
£1.29m  
Restated
£1.63m
Develop 
target
Decarbonisation Fund in place since 2020 
supporting investment in efficiency of our 
standing assets. Plan to utilise the fund to 
support decarbonisation of our value chain.
FY23/24 contribution is lower due to reductions 
in Scope 1 and 2 emissions and no completed 
developments meeting the criteria for payment 
of the ICP.
Electricity purchased 
from renewable sources
Risk:  
5, 7, 9
Opp:  
4, 5, 8, 9, 11
2020
100%
100%
100%
100%
We procure 100% REGO-backed electricity, 
however we are reviewing this approach to 
ensure our approach to energy procurement 
is robust and transparent.
On-site renewable  
energy generation
Risk:  
5, 7, 9
Opp:  
4, 5, 8, 9, 11
2020
27 MWh
5.3 MWh  
Restated
6.7 MWh
Target 
removed
Our original target of 600MWh of renewable 
energy generation by 2030 has been reviewed 
as part of our Roadmap refresh exercise. We are 
re-prioritising this pillar of our Roadmap towards 
a more robust and transparent approach 
to energy procurement across the portfolio. 
We will continue to install on-site renewable 
energy on all new developments.
1.	 Based on operational floor area, excluding on-site development. Further detail with forecast EPC ratings can be found on page 47.
Further information complimentary to this disclosure can be found in our Sustainability Statement of Intent and our Roadmap 
to Net Zero v2.0, providing context and historic performance against all metrics and targets, at www.gpe.co.uk/reporting
Our Sustainability Performance tables detail our full performance against our targets for the last financial year. Detailed reporting of 
our sustainability performance, including energy consumption and Scope 1, 2 and relevant Scope 3 metrics (including carbon emissions 
associated with water consumption and waste management), is included within our Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) 
table on pages 46 to 48 of this report.
Strategic Report – Annual review
61
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Sustainability continued
Our business model is to take poorly performing, unloved buildings and reposition them 
into best-in-class sustainable spaces. In order to deliver our sustainability strategy we 
work with our whole value chain, whether that is our supply chain partners, our customers, 
local communities and planning authorities, investors, purchasers or lenders.
Minerva House, SE1 – Major refurbishment on the banks of the Thames
Egyptian and Dudley House, SW1 – Heritage refurbishment focused on retention
2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2 – New build driving energy efficiency
Local authorities
In our efforts to integrate climate 
resilience within our own business, as well 
as our value chain, we recognise that we 
are one part of a much larger picture 
when it comes to delivering a resilient 
built environment that can withstand 
the impacts of a changing climate 
and safeguarding London’s future.
At our major refurbishment project 
Minerva House, SE1, we have been 
collaborating with the local planning 
authority as well as the Environment 
Agency to ensure we design and build 
for a London that will be subject 
Freeholders
Across our portfolio we are often the 
long leaseholder, requiring effective 
collaboration and communication 
with our freehold partners.
At Egyptian and Dudley House, we 
have been working very closely with 
the Crown Estate, to not only align our 
sustainability ambitions, but also to 
push each other forward in a number of 
areas. By providing consistent messaging 
to both our value chains, we can create 
efficiencies whilst driving best practice 
and innovation.
Supply chain partners
Our innovative approach to dismantling 
City Place House to allow the reuse 
of steel at both 2 Aldermanbury 
Square and French Railways House 
& 50 Jermyn Street demonstrates 
the value of close collaboration with 
our supply chain partners. 
Our partners, Arup, Elliott Wood, 
Keltbray, EMR and Lendlease 
challenged each other to deliver 
a market-leading approach to the 
circular economy, delivering emissions 
savings at French Railways House.
to a number of physical climate risks. 
The project is located on the northern 
edge of Southwark, between Borough 
Market and the River Thames, and as such 
is directly impacted by a potential increase 
in flooding as climate change progresses. 
During the planning and design phases 
of the development, the project team 
have worked with the engineers at the 
Environment Agency to deliver improved 
resilience through repairs to the brick 
flood defence and specifying specialist 
render to the basement walls to increase 
their durability and lifespan. This work has 
been informed by the Environment Agency’s 
updated Thames Estuary 2100 Plan.
Supply chain partners
Strong collaboration not only supports 
the environmental element of sustainability 
but can drive positive change with regard 
to social and ethical outcomes.
We are working with our principal contractor, 
8Build, to roll-out ethical labour audits 
across the Egyptian and Dudley House 
supply chain. The aim is to identify key risk 
areas, including modern slavery, engage 
directly with the workforce on-site to hear 
their experiences and ensure we improve 
our own procurement processes to deliver 
a better, safer place of work for all.
Customers
The sustainability features of 
2 Aldermanbury Square were central 
to discussions with our customer, 
Clifford Chance LLP. Right from the start 
sustainability played a significant role 
in their decision to pre-let the building, 
three years ahead of completion. 
Discussions included energy use, 
embodied carbon and the delivery 
of a NABERS rated building, and have 
expanded to nature-based solutions  
and the impact of a joint approach 
to social value.
62
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our people and culture
Q&A with Carrie Heiss, HR Director
Q: What makes the culture at GPE so special?
Our culture is the character and personality of GPE. 
It stands out because it’s the embodiment of a great 
purpose and core values which define who we are and 
how we act. These values, outlined on page 03, are at 
the heart of what we do and what makes us special.
Of course, it’s our people who bring the culture and the 
values to life, so it’s really important that our values resonate 
with everyone. GPE’s values were developed several years ago 
in a collaborative, all-company exercise. We have recently 
reviewed these values with colleagues to ensure that they 
continue to inform our beliefs and behaviours and they are as 
relevant today as they’ve ever been. Following our colleague 
feedback, we were pleased to adopt a fifth value, ‘We value 
every customer’, which reflects the importance and the 
focus we have on providing a great customer experience.
Each year, we have an extremely high response rate to our 
Engagement Survey (February 2024 Engagement Survey: 
98% response rate and 1,300 comments). This shows our 
colleagues care deeply about our business and making their 
voices heard. We rely heavily on this input to continue to 
evolve our working practices and ensure that GPE remains 
a fantastic place to work. Our overall favourability rating 
of 74% is reassuring and reinforces that we are doing a lot 
of things very well.
Q: What actions have we taken to embed 
GPE’s values this year?
We’ve helped colleagues and leaders to personalise 
the values for themselves and their teams and I can share a 
couple of examples. All colleagues took part in Customer First 
Workshops earlier in the year where we discussed GPE’s service 
standards and made ‘team commitments’ to action these in our 
everyday activities. We even kept track of these commitments 
with a ‘Leader Board’ throughout the year. This fun and friendly 
competition between teams has helped to ensure that our 
collective commitments to customers are being actioned. 
The value, ‘We are fair and inclusive’ was similarly brought to 
life through Inclusion Workshops attended by all colleagues 
in the autumn. We worked with a specialist D&I consultant to 
create a safe space for colleagues to engage on a number 
of issues relating to inclusion. With an emphasis on personal 
and collective responsibility to create an inclusive workplace, 
colleagues were asked to make personal commitments to 
reflect what they could do to make a difference in the future. 
These were displayed for everyone to access and socialise.
We regularly take opportunities to publicly recognise 
behaviour that exemplifies our values. Colleagues have the 
opportunity to nominate their peers for a quarterly ‘Living 
our values’ award and these are awarded by the CEO.
Q: What have we done this year to deliver 
against our people priorities?
We are always looking for ways to improve our colleague 
experience at GPE and two specific initiatives come to mind. 
This year we invested heavily in our leadership capabilities, 
designing and conducting two bespoke development 
programmes: ‘Inspire’ for our people managers; and 
‘Momentum’ for our senior leaders. Having great people 
management and leadership skills makes the work 
environment better for everyone. Over several months, our 
managers and leaders worked with experts, both in small 
teams and one-on-one with coaches, to improve their 
knowledge, hone their skills and most importantly to confidently 
connect with their people as capable and inclusive leaders.
Another highlight for the year is an initiative we launched 
to promote colleagues’ willingness and comfort to speak up 
and share their views. This is clearly an important attribute 
for a positive and healthy culture and, while we consistently 
have high response rates for our anonymous surveys, this is 
an area of continuous focus. We started a listening initiative 
called ‘The Booth’, which allows members of our Executive 
Committee to host up to seven colleagues in a monthly 
session at a local cafe with the sole purpose of engaging 
with colleagues and listening to what they want to discuss. 
Across the 13 sessions held in 2023, we heard ideas, suggestions, 
complaints and concerns – all in a safe and informal setting. 
Participants appreciated the opportunity to interact with 
members of the Executive Committee, and other colleagues, 
in a relaxed and informal setting. These sessions have been 
positively received and we plan to continue them in 2024. 
“Our success is a testament to 
the passion and commitment of 
our people. At the heart of all our 
achievements lie their dedication 
and talent.”
Carrie Heiss Human Resources Director
88%
of our employees 
are proud to work 
at GPE
84%
of our employees say 
that GPE’s core values 
are aligned with their 
own personal values
Strategic Report – Annual review
63
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our people and culture continued
Q: What are the people priorities for the 
year ahead?
We will continue to progress our three-year People Strategy 
referred to internally as OneGPE which puts diversity and 
inclusion in the centre, with five additional focus areas: 
colleague experience, growth and progression, leadership 
capability, performance and reward, and health and 
wellbeing. The strategy is due to be updated in 2024 
with a roadmap to cover the next three years to achieve 
measurable progress in key areas, including engagement, 
diversity, inclusion and retention.
GPE aims to be the place where the best people do their 
best work. This means ensuring we have the right talent and the 
right skills where needed. We want everyone to achieve their 
full potential. One of GPE’s core values is ‘We are committed 
to excellence’ and with a high-performance culture it is vital to 
promote and support our colleagues’ growth and progression. 
To complement our focus on leadership capability in 2023 with 
Inspire and Momentum, we look forward to launching ‘Thrive’ 
in 2024, to support colleagues in achieving their potential and 
performance goals, focusing on the development of resilience, 
feedback and accountability skills. We will continue to run our 
highly successful internal GPE mentorship scheme, focusing 
on our high-potential population as identified in our annual 
Talent Review. This scheme matches around 20 individuals with 
senior leaders and runs for 9–12 months. Our Non-Executive 
Directors will also be continuing with mentoring sessions 
with selected members of senior management. 
Another priority is consolidating the organisational changes 
that we made in 2023/24, which are explained below. With a 
workforce of 134 colleagues as at 31 March 2024 (down from 
139 in March 2023) we rely on teamwork and collaboration to 
achieve our objectives and exemplify the value ‘We achieve 
more together’. We successfully onboarded 29 new joiners 
in the year and had 34 leavers. Our retention rate of 75.5% 
as a measure of stability (down from 83.5% in 2023) reflects 
a stable workforce.
We have continued to evolve the shape of the organisation 
to reflect our strategic ambition to grow our Flex office 
footprint and deliver an excellent customer experience. 
Changes to team structures and people within teams 
occurred predominantly in the second half of the year. 
We reviewed team structures, roles within teams, reporting 
lines and resourcing levels, making changes where 
necessary to ensure we are well positioned to deliver 
our strategic plans. Changes and the rationale for these 
changes were communicated and the priority for this 
coming year is to ensure that our teams are all working 
well and collaborating effectively.
Alexa Baden-Powell, Inspire participant  
and Senior Investment Manager:
“I found the Inspire programme very useful indeed. It gave 
me a better understanding of different managerial styles. 
The 360 feedback was really interesting and good to hear. 
It sparked some useful discussions with my team, helping 
us to improve the way we work together.”
Rebecca Bradley, Momentum participant and 
Director of Customer Experience & Relationships:
“For me, there were several benefits to taking part 
in Momentum. The one-on-one coaching sessions 
enabled me to work on my own personal development 
areas while the practical sessions facilitated an open 
environment where we could learn together and 
practice our leadership and coaching skills on each 
other. The whole programme provided the opportunity 
to build stronger relationships with peers in an informal 
environment, which has supported cross-departmental 
communication since the programme finished. I feel 
good about working for a company that invests in its 
people by providing this type of opportunity.”
64
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our employee survey is comprised of 70 questions covering all aspects of the employee experience.  
Within this, we consistently ask three core questions to give us an indication of overall employee 
engagement. While the scores for these are down slightly from the same period last year, mainly 
attributed to the organisational restructure and ensuing changes, they remain positive overall.
76%
Employee  
Engagement Index 
(February 2024)
84% in March 2023
74%
of our employees 
recommend GPE as  
a great place to work
85% in March 2023
80%
of our employees  
believe in what we are  
trying to achieve
87% in March 2023
72%
say work gives them  
a personal feeling  
of accomplishment
78% in March 23
Where we’ve improved based on feedback 
we heard and actions we’ve taken this year
We have worked hard on connecting with our colleagues, 
listening to them and generally encouraging people 
to be themselves. Our targeted efforts to foster a truly 
inclusive workplace have started to feed through to the 
feedback from colleagues. Where we have seen the biggest 
improvement in favourable scores from FY23 to FY24 are:
+11%	I feel safe and able to speak up at GPE.
+9%	 I am treated with respect.
+9%	 People from diverse backgrounds are helped to feel 
accepted and be themselves.
+7%	 I feel comfortable here, accepted and able to be myself.
+6%	 An effort is made to accommodate any particular 
need or goal that I have.
Where we still have work to do
There are three main areas of improvement that we need to focus 
on based on the input and feedback we received in February.
Area to improve
1.	 Collaboration between different teams to get things done.
2.	 Improving internal systems and processes for 
optimal productivity.
3.	 Our physical environment in our head office location; 
making it more functional and enjoyable.
Actions planned
1.	 Team objectives for FY25 are being articulated and 
shared between teams to clarify roles and responsibilities.
2.	 This has been built into the work plan for our new 
Director of Digital & Technology.
3.	 A plan has been made to refresh and reconfigure the 
space in our head office building. This will be completed 
later in the year.
Continuous improvement
A few of our key achievements in FY24
April–June  
2023
July–September  
2023
October– December  
2023
January–March  
2024
	
– Listening Initiative 
(‘The Booth’).
	
– Introduced new Bank 
Holiday Swap Policy 
(suggested by the 
Inclusion Committee).
	
– Customer First workshops 
attended by all colleagues 
in teams.
	
– Signed the Race at 
Work Charter (Business 
in the Community).
	
– Published first ‘Diversity 
Tracker’ to all colleagues 
providing full transparency  
on self-declared 
demographic profile.
	
– Introduced key new benefits 
(additional support for fertility, 
menopause, volunteering).
	
– Achieved Bronze level 
Accreditation with Clear 
Assured (global accreditation 
for best practice in diversity 
and inclusion).
	
– Following shareholder 
approval of our revised 2023 
Directors’ remuneration 
policy at the 2023 AGM, 
we communicated changes 
to our annual bonus process 
with a new corporate 
scorecard cascaded through 
the business.
	
– Achieved Level 3  
Disability Confident 
 Leader (highest status).
	
– Compulsory Inclusion 
Training for the entire 
business resulting in 
personal commitments 
and greater D&I  
competence.
	
– Rotated volunteer leaders 
for our Impact Groups.
	
–  Adopted a new Board-
approved ethnic diversity 
target for senior leaders 
(Parker Review).
	
– HR-driven social value 
confirmed – £162,460 for 
the year (combination of 
training, apprenticeships, 
mental health support).
	
– Reviewed, refreshed and 
published updated our 
corporate values (adding 
a fifth for customer).
	
– Conducted a 
comprehensive annual 
employee engagement  
survey.
Strategic Report – Annual review
65
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our people and culture continued
Powered by people
We have made several key changes and appointments 
this year, promoting from within and also recruiting talented 
specialists to support the acceleration of our flexible office 
space roll-out and our focus on customers. We have also 
taken steps to ensure our core supporting infrastructure 
is strong and future-fit, whilst remaining focused on 
headcount and cost management.
	
– Simon Rowley was promoted to the role of Director 
of Flex Workspaces with overall responsibility to grow 
our Flex office footprint.
	
– Jordan McLean was recruited as Director of Digital 
& Technology and assumed responsibility for all our 
digital transformation and innovation activities 
in addition to managing our IT infrastructure.
	
– Helen Hare expanded her Projects remit to include 
Health & Safety and two new teams; Technical Services 
and Flex Workspaces Design and Delivery.
	
– Felicity Roocke was recruited as Head of Flex 
Workspaces Design & Delivery and is responsible for 
leading our workplace design and delivery strategy 
for all our Flex projects.
	
– Federico Boronet joined as Senior Central Services 
Manager in our Customer Experience team and has 
responsibility for procurement and supply chain 
management of all outsourced service contracts 
and strategic service partner management.
	
– Anthony Osho was promoted to Customer 
Relationships and Insights Lead, a new role focused 
on Flex customers and portfolio-wide insight.
	
– Timothy Scanlon was recruited as a Customer 
Experience Senior Manager overseeing our 
Customer Operations at 200 Gray’s Inn Road.
	
– Molly Maguire joined as a Flex Leasing Manager and 
is focused on growing our flexible workplace offering.
	
– Mark Walkden was promoted to Head of Technical 
Services, with responsibility for the technical aspects 
of all our buildings.
	
– Hugh Morgan, already a commercial Director, was 
appointed as Director of Portfolio Management, 
overseeing the implementation of asset strategies 
across our entire building portfolio.
	
– Martin Leighton and Stephen Burrows were appointed  
Co-Directors of Finance in an internal restructuring 
of the Finance team. They are jointly responsible for 
Corporate Finance, Finance Operations, Financial 
Reporting, and Financial Planning & Analysis.
Anthony Osho, Customer Relationships  
& Insights Lead:
“I’m looking forward to developing a dedicated 
customer account management capability alongside 
our asset and operational teams. Also, understanding 
our customers’ experiences through what they tell 
us and what they don’t tell us (but what we see in 
how they interact with our spaces) is the next step 
for insight strategy.”
Jordan McLean, Director of Digital & Technology:
“I’m really excited about the opportunity to drive 
genuine innovation and digitisation into an industry 
that is ripe for change. GPE have the appetite, energy 
and leadership to transform not just the Company 
but the whole industry and I’m thrilled to be here 
to lead us on that journey.”
Molly Maguire, Flex Leasing Manager:
“I was very keen to join a brilliant team who all have 
a shared goal and vision of creating, delivering and 
leasing market-leading Flex spaces across London. It was 
GPE’s Flex aspirations and commitment to the growth 
of the Fully Managed portfolio which I found incredibly 
exciting and something I wanted to be a part of.”
66
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Colleagues making a difference
GPE has four very active Impact Groups that are focused on diversity, equality and inclusion issues. Each Impact Group is led 
by volunteer colleagues from across the business and is sponsored by a member of the Executive Committee. These groups 
are overseen by our Inclusion Committee, which meets six times a year and coordinates our efforts to cultivate an inclusive 
workplace. The Inclusion Committee also advocates other strands of diversity for which we do not presently have an Impact 
Group (primarily LGBTQ+ and abilities including visible and invisible disabilities).
Felicity Kelly, currently on 
a secondment to HR covering 
a maternity leave:
“In the six years I have been here, I have 
definitely seen progress in terms of 
the culture and ensuring that equal 
opportunities exist for everyone to 
succeed and advance their careers.” 
James Harrop-Griffiths, 
Investment Manager and 
Inclusion Committee member:
“I have been a member of the IC since 
it started in 2022. It’s been a fantastic 
forum to increase my own learning and 
confidence in talking about these topics 
and I feel like I am helping to make 
GPE a safe space for everyone.” 
Yasemin Kiani, Communications 
Lead and Co-Chair of the R&EIG:
“At first I was concerned that the D&I 
work would be ‘all talk, no action’ but 
I’ve actually seen the commitment from 
our most senior leaders and I believe 
they mean what they say. We still have 
a lot to do but are on the right path.”
Health & Wellbeing Impact Group
Our Health & Wellbeing Impact Group supports our vision 
of happy and healthy colleagues by raising awareness, 
increasing knowledge and ensuring people have access to 
tips and tools to improve their physical, mental and financial 
wellbeing. The group sponsors a variety of events across the 
year and there is widespread participation. Examples include 
mini ‘health-MOTs’, a January fitness challenge, monthly 
chair massages, board-game lunches, walking meetings, 
nutrition talks, and financial planning seminars.
Race & Ethnicity Impact Group
Our Race & Ethnicity Impact Group is comprised of a 
multi-cultural group of colleagues from across the business. 
The purpose of this group is to support each other to 
succeed at GPE and seeks to educate, encourage allyship, 
and to generally create an environment which empowers 
and celebrates the race, ethnicity and heritage of all our 
colleagues. By raising awareness, the group has been 
instrumental in helping colleagues in the wider business 
to become more comfortable talking about race, 
ethnicity and religion.
Women’s Impact Group
Our Women’s Impact Group advocates on issues and policies 
related to gender equality and seeks to provide a safe, 
supportive ‘network’ where colleagues can share experiences 
and challenges as well as learn from and help each other. 
This group provides networking opportunities for GPE women 
through social and learning events and a ‘buddy system’ 
which rotates on a quarterly basis. The group also organised 
events for International Women’s Day and held various 
training sessions, open to all (Panel Speaking, Resilience, 
Avoiding Burnout, and Silencing your Inner Critic).
Parents & Carers Impact Group
Our Parents & Carers Impact Group recognises the challenge 
for those with caring responsibilities outside of work to 
balance this with a thriving career. This group is committed 
to helping colleagues feel empowered to be the best they 
can be both inside and outside of work. This group has 
actively influenced our family benefit policies and has 
ensured that all colleagues have access to a widely used 
support portal which offers resources and information 
to help people achieve a healthy work-life balance.
Strategic Report – Annual review
67
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our people and culture continued
GPE gender and ethnicity balance
Diversity and inclusion is at the heart of our People Strategy. 
We genuinely believe that diversity gives us strength and we 
value all kinds of diversity including diversity of experience, 
thought and perspective. We are proud of the fact that:
	
– 89% of our colleagues say that they are treated with respect;
	
– 79% say they feel comfortable at GPE, accepted and able 
to be themselves;
	
– 70% feel that GPE is doing the right things to improve D&I.
These results are encouraging and we will continue to build 
on our progress to date. We are convinced that diverse 
leadership teams create a competitive advantage and  
we have set some important aspirational targets for 
our gender and ethnic diversity to help us achieve 
our ambitions. Specifically:
	
– 20% of all management roles will be held by colleagues 
who identify with an ethnic minority category by 
31 March 2025. 31 March 2024: 15%.
	
– 40% of all senior leadership roles will be held by 
women by 31 March 2025. 31 March 2024: 33.3%.
In line with the Parker Review recommendations, we have 
also set a further target for at least 15% of our senior 
managers (Executive Committee and their direct reports) 
to be represented by individuals identifying with an ethnic 
minority category by the end of 2027. 31 March 2024: 4.2%.
Diversity disclosure tables
Gender:  
as at 31 March 2024
Number 
of Board 
members
Percentage 
of the Board
Number of  
Senior Positions 
on Board  
(CEO, CFO,  
SID and Chair)
Number 
in Executive
Management*
Percentage 
of Executive 
Management
Number  
of total 
employees
Percentage  
of total 
employees
Men
6
60%
4
6
75%
64
48%
Women
4
40%
–
2
25%
69
51%
Other categories
–
0%
–
–
0%
1
1%
Not specified/prefer not to say
–
0%
–
–
0%
–
0%
*	 In accordance with the UK Listing Rules’ definition, Executive Management comprises the Executive Committee (being the most senior executive 
body below the Board).
Ethnic Background:  
as at 31 March 2024
Number 
of Board 
members
Percentage 
of the Board
Number of  
Senior Positions 
on Board  
(CEO, CFO,  
SID and Chair)
Number 
in Executive
Management*
Percentage 
of Executive 
Management
Number  
of total 
employees
Percentage  
of total 
employees
White British or other White  
(including minority-white groups)
9
90%
4
8
100%
97
72%
Mixed/multiple ethnic groups
–
0%
–
–
0%
9
7%
Asian/Asian British
1
10%
–
–
0%
7
5%
Black/African/Caribbean/
Black British
–
0%
–
–
0%
11
8%
Other ethnic group,  
including Arab
–
0%
–
–
0%
4
3%
Not specified/prefer not to say
–
0%
–
–
0%
6
5%
Approach to data collection
All individuals are asked to self-report their ethnicity and gender identity on a strictly confidential and voluntary basis with a ‘prefer not to say’ option for 
certain fields. Over 95% of our population have self-reported personal information for ethnicity and gender identity as well as religion, sexual orientation 
and disability.
Senior leadership gender diversity as at 31 March 2024
Males
Females
% Female
Executive Committee
6
2
25.0%
Senior Management 
10
6
37.5%
All senior leadership roles
16
8
33.3%
Senior Management above is comprised of our Department 
Directors and Heads of Departments. As at 31 March 2024, and 
for the purposes of disclosure under section 414C Companies 
Act 2006, our ‘senior leader’ population of Executive 
Committee members (excluding the Executive Directors) 
and members of Senior Management comprised 16 men 
(66.6%) and 8 women (33.3%).
Executive Committee and direct reports as at 31 March 2024
63%
37%
Male 17
Female 10
The Executive Committee 
and their direct reports include 
Executive Directors, other Executive 
Committee members (including 
the General Counsel and Company 
Secretary) and their direct 
reports comprising individuals 
for whom they have direct line 
management responsibility, 
excluding administrative or 
support roles.
Information prescribed by the Listing Rules on the gender diversity of our Board and Executive Management, and also of our 
total employee population, is set out in the diversity disclosure tables below. Details regarding the Board’s Diversity Policy and 
representation targets, its approach to D&I and our Board diversity statement can be found in the Nomination Committee 
report on pages 112 and 113.
68
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our stakeholder relationships
Whichever offer our customers choose, they are each 
developed with sustainability at their core. We future proof our 
spaces, incorporating technology to enhance the customer 
experience, and they are designed to promote health and 
wellbeing for our customers and local communities, with highly 
adaptable open plan configurations and outdoor spaces.
We recognise that to deliver a high quality service, we need 
to have a direct relationship with our customers. Therefore, 
we have dedicated in-house Customer Experience and 
Workplace Technical Services teams whose roles are to 
manage the day-to-day operation of our buildings and 
deliver an attractive service provision to all of our customers.
Our service proposition
It takes a true partnership to unlock potential. That is why 
we work hand in hand with our customers to ensure we thrive 
together. We understand there is no one size fits all approach 
and that we need to work closely with our customers to 
understand their challenges and changing needs. Our service 
proposition ‘Together we thrive’ helps ensure we continue 
to deliver and maintain the highest standards and includes 
five service standards that have been rolled out across the 
business to ensure consistency in our approach, whilst also 
providing a strong promise to our customers:
Knowledge of the changing needs of our customers requires a 
close relationship and regular engagement. A key element of 
our approach, in addition to frequent day-to-day interaction, 
is to require our team to formally meet with every customer 
twice a year and we have enhanced our engagement with 
Executive Committee members meeting a cross section of 
our customers at least annually. Furthermore, our refreshed 
Roadmap to Net Zero has introduced new sustainability 
customer engagement targets. These meetings, combined 
with the independent customer satisfaction surveys we 
undertake, provide an understanding of how our customers’ 
real estate needs are developing and provide valuable insight 
into the health of the sectors in which they operate.
Examples of topics raised during the year
	
– The rising cost of energy for our customers;
	
– Ensuring safety of buildings and health and wellbeing 
of people in the office;
	
– Opportunities to improve service charge communication 
and management processes;
	
– Areas to improve the user experience of our sesame® app;
	
– Single point of contact to support customer requirements, 
enhanced strategic relationship with GPE; and
	
– Timely repair and swift communication of building issues.
Approach and objectives
Customer First
We know that every business is different, so we provide 
choice to allow our customers to create their space the way 
they want it. Our Ready to Fit offering provides flexibility for 
customers to design and build the space in our buildings that is 
just right for them and their people. We provide Fitted spaces 
that are designed for our customers by our in-house experts. 
Customers can also choose to have their space Fully Managed 
by us, where we take care of everything, making life easier 
and hassle free so they can concentrate on their business.
Customers
Understanding our customers’ businesses and 
having a deep appreciation of what they require 
enables us to deliver a workplace environment 
in which they can focus on their own business 
activities. Having a strong, enduring relationship 
with our customers means we can work with them 
to ensure they remain satisfied within their existing 
workspace, and allows us to retain or relocate 
them when their occupational requirements 
change. Our ‘Customer First’ approach is vital to  
help us design and deliver spaces and experience 
which allow our customers’ businesses to thrive.
The role of the property owner is rapidly changing 
as the needs of customers evolve. An attractive 
office is now considered more than simply a location  
in which to do business. It serves a broader purpose.  
It needs to enhance the productivity of the 
workforce, align to a business’s brand and culture 
and play a key role in attracting and retaining 
talent in a competitive marketplace.
GPE customer mix %
11%
31%
17%
23%
Retail, hospitality 
and leisure
Banking and finance
Professional
Corporates
Technology, media 
and telecoms
18%
Our key stakeholders have been identified as our investors, people, 
customers, joint venture partners, communities, local planning authorities 
and suppliers. See more on our people and culture on pages 63 to 68
See more on engaging with our investors on pages 100 and 101
See more on our communities on pages 50 and 51
Building and nurturing the relationships we have with our stakeholders is critical to our 
success and too valuable to outsource. As a result, we manage all aspects of our property 
portfolio in-house. We aim to build lasting relationships based on professionalism, 
fair dealing and integrity.
Service standards:
Actively  
listen 
Bring the  
energy 
Be  
flexible 
Add  
value
Keep our  
word
Service proposition: 
Together we thrive
Strategic Report – Annual review
69
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our stakeholder relationships continued
Our joint venture partners
Joint ventures are an important part of our business 
and today they comprise three active partnerships, 
with BP Pension Fund (GRP), the HKMA (GHS) and 
Threadneedle (GVP). Our joint ventures are built on 
long-term relationships with trusted, high quality 
partners. At 31 March 2024, they made up 20.4% 
of the portfolio valuation, 31.0% of net assets 
and  21.4% of rent roll (at 31 March 2023: 22.0%, 
28.1% and 23.9% respectively).
Approach and objectives
Our approach has been to seek joint venture partners to 
help us unlock real estate opportunities that might not have 
been available to GPE alone, either through sharing risk or 
providing access to new properties. The success of our joint 
venture activities relies on strong relationships with our 
partners, based on frequent engagement. Each partnership 
has a joint board (including at least one GPE Executive 
Director) that typically meets quarterly on a formal basis 
with frequent ad hoc engagement throughout the year. 
The joint venture properties are valued quarterly, with 
detailed management information being provided to 
the joint venture board.
Examples of topics raised during the year
	
– Evaluating the further roll out of Fitted and Fully Managed 
spaces in Elm Yard, WC1 in GRP;
	
– Consideration of the refurbishment of 200 Gray’s Inn Road, 
WC1 in GRP;
	
– Completion of the retail leasing at Hanover Square, W1 
in GHS; and
	
– The retail leasing strategy for Mount Royal, W1, in GVP 
given the evolution of Oxford Street.
How did we respond
	
– Further Flex roll out complete at Elm Yard with the 
majority of the building now let on either a Fitted 
or Fully Managed basis; 
	
– Preparation for the refurbishment of elements of 
200 Gray’s Inn Road with an anticipated start in 
summer 2024; and
	
– strong leasing at Mount Royal, W1, including a new  
22,500 sq ft flagship store for TK Maxx.
Next steps
Looking forward, we are working closely with our partners 
to advance our business plans across our existing 
joint ventures, together with actively seeking opportunities 
to acquire new assets in joint venture structures.
How did we respond
	
– Incorporated customer feedback/issue tracking 
in GPE customer CRM;
	
– Simplified our sesame® app, with phased roll out 
planned and testing underway;
	
– Senior management tours of all development sites 
and the managed portfolio exclusively focusing 
on health and safety; and
	
– Detailed customer journey mapping completed, 
service charge and Flex process improvements 
being implemented.
High levels of customer satisfaction
We commission an annual independent customer 
satisfaction survey which is designed to determine our 
customers’ satisfaction with their building, communication, 
our understanding of their business needs and ease of doing 
business with us. This year 122 retail and office customers 
participated. A key output of the survey is a Net Promoter 
Score (NPS), which is best translated as the willingness to 
recommend GPE. It is expressed as an absolute number 
between -100 and +100.
Our office NPS remains high, at +30.2 in 2024 (2023: +44.0). 
Whilst this year’s score is lower than last year, it remains 
materially ahead of the industry average of +6.9. From the 
valuable feedback and comments we receive, we prepare 
building-specific action plans to further improve our 
services. The plans are produced within four weeks of the 
results and implemented as soon as possible, demonstrating 
that we have listened and, more importantly, acted 
on feedback.
Next steps
70% of respondents to our customer survey shared a 
sustainability contact within their organisations for us 
to talk to which will help us and our customers drive down 
energy usage, drive up recycling rates and implement 
new sustainability activities to lower our joint impact 
on the environment.
Through our customer survey, this year many of our 
customers told us that they would like a more strategic 
relationship with us outside of their day-to-day interaction 
with our CXM team. To this end we will be strategic, ensuring 
that we spend more time hearing from the decision makers 
within our customer community to ensure we better 
understand their business and how we can help support 
their space requirements.
We have also recently hired a Data Analyst to join our 
CX team so 2024 will see us focusing more than ever on 
what our data tells us, and using it to draw out actionable 
insights to further improve customer experience.
Operational 
measure
Customer satisfaction  
(Office Net Promoter Score)
 +30.2
2023: +44.0
Operational 
measure
Net assets in  
joint venture
31.0%
2023: 28.1%
70
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Local planning authorities
Developing buildings in central London is challenging. 
Conservation areas protect a large proportion of 
the city, building heights are restricted, development 
needs to be considerate to local residents and 
justified in sustainability terms. Consequently, 
the planning process is increasingly demanding, 
lengthy and costly. Therefore, our relationships 
with local planning authorities and communities 
are key to the delivery of new spaces in London.
Approach and objectives
Navigating the planning process is key to our success. 
We engage with local authorities, residents and other 
stakeholders in an open, transparent and constructive manner 
to understand their needs and, where possible, adjust our 
proposals to take account of comments received. This helps 
us to secure planning consents that are beneficial to us and 
the local communities in which they are built. During the 
deconstruction and construction phases, we maintain regular 
meetings with residents and stakeholders to ensure we 
mitigate the impact of the works and aim for our projects 
to creating a lasting positive social impact in London. 
Examples of topics raised during the year
	
– The increasing importance of sustainability commitments 
and their impact on the planning landscape;
	
– The appropriate level of carbon tariffs, including new 
proposals by Westminster City Council;
	
– Successful planning consents at Minerva House, SE1 
and French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1;
	
– Planning refusal on appeal for non-determination of 
our proposed New City Court, SE1 development; and
	
– Increasing local authority preference for retrofit 
over new build.
How did we respond
	
– Proactive engagement regarding the design and 
development of schemes, with changes made to 
incorporate feedback;
	
– Maintaining an appropriate balance between retrofit 
and new build, including innovative approaches 
to the circular economy;
	
– Driving down our in-use carbon through demanding 
operational carbon intensity standards; 
	
– Continued consultation with local authorities 
directly and through business organisations; and
	
– Resident and key local stakeholder consultation 
during planning processes.
Next steps
Over the coming year, we will be focused on managing 
the procurement and delivery of our near-term projects, 
whilst also progressing the early design stages of our 
longer-term pipeline. We are also building on our innovative 
approaches to design, materials and procurement to maintain 
our market leading position on sustainability matters. 
Furthermore, we will build on our ‘responsible developer’ 
credentials and the benefits to our projects including; 
creation of employment generating space, strong 
sustainability credentials, social value and biodiversity.
Our suppliers
We work with a diverse range of suppliers, from small 
independents to large multinationals. The successful 
and profitable delivery of our larger projects requires 
strong relationships and collegiate working across 
our supply chain. Whilst most procurement is subject 
to a tender process to ensure we obtain value for 
money, we aim to partner with suppliers who share 
our values, work to secure the best people with 
an established track record and, where possible, 
retain key team members on successive projects.
Approach and objectives
The close relationship we foster with our suppliers, alongside 
a track record of successful project delivery and a deep pipeline 
of future work, means that people want to work with us, 
and ensures that we have good access to quality partners. 
For our development, refurbishment and fit-out projects, 
regular communication is paramount. This starts with the 
design process, where we encourage our project teams to 
consider the art of the possible and work with our contractors 
to explore new and innovative ways of working. We are 
increasingly working with our supply chain partners much 
earlier in the design process, including our leasing agents to 
help us to ensure our buildings are optimally designed and, 
where appropriate, evolve over the project to remain relevant. 
We also aim to treat our suppliers fairly through prompt 
payment, including bi-monthly payment terms with some 
of our largest contractors. Whilst we expect all our suppliers 
to operate to high standards, our Supplier Code of Conduct 
sets out the standards that we require. Furthermore, we work 
closely with our suppliers to enable us to achieve the goals set 
out in our Sustainability Statement of Intent, using sensible 
procurement methods to mitigate our carbon impact where 
possible. We ensure that the sustainability and social impact 
goals of our suppliers are taken into account prior to tendering 
our contracts. 
Examples of topics raised during the year
	
– Support for site safety and mental health;
	
– Impacts of inflationary pressures and supply 
chain disruption; 
	
– How to improve productivity in design, procurement 
and construction; and
	
– Greater collaboration to reduce our carbon footprint 
and improve social impact.
How did we respond
	
– 35 days’ average payment terms;
	
– Working with suppliers on information sharing and 
initiatives to reduce carbon through the supply chain; 
	
– Encouraged the adoption of the principles of the 
Private Sector Playbook; and 
	
– Working with suppliers to manage procurement options 
and minimise the risk of modern slavery.
Next steps
Continue our collaboration with Lendlease to deliver the 
redevelopment of 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, with Mace 
to deliver French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1 
and with Multiplex to deliver Minerva House, SE1. For our 
refurbishment and fit-out schemes we continue our great 
work with Faithdean, 8Build, Knight Harwood and ISG 
and also continue to expand our contractor base for  
our near-term schemes.
Strategic Report – Annual review
71
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Engaging with our stakeholders
You can read more about our approach to s.172(1) matters and stakeholder engagement as follows:
Key decisions and  
long-term consequences
Statement from the Chair
See more on page 01
An evolving strategy underpinned by our 
values and commitment to sustainability
See more on pages 02 and 03
How we create value
See more on pages 12 and 13
Impact on decisions
See more on page 104
Letter from the Chair of the Board
See more on pages 91 to 93
What we did in 2023/24
See more on pages 106 and 107
Employees
Our people and culture
See more on pages 63 to 68
Leadership and purpose
See more on pages 98, 99, 102 and 103
Fostering business relationships with 
suppliers, customers and others
Our stakeholder relationships
See more on pages 39, 50, 63 to 70, 100 to 101
Leadership and purpose
See more on page 99
Communities
We are creating a lasting positive 
social impact in our communities
See more on pages 50 and 51 and 69 to 71
Leadership and purpose
See more on page 99
Environment
Sustainability
See more on pages 37 to 62
Our stakeholder relationships
See more on pages 69 to 71
High standards of business conduct
Our people and culture
See more on pages 63 to 68
Our stakeholder relationships
See more on pages 69 to 71
Letter from the Chair of the Board
See more on pages 91 to 93
Anti-fraud, bribery and corruption,  
ethics and whistleblowing
See more on pages 105 and 120
Investors
Letter from the Chair of the Board
See more on pages 91 to 93
Leadership and purpose
See more on pages 100 and 101
Our engagement
Our extensive engagement efforts help to ensure that 
the Board can understand, consider and balance broad, 
and sometimes conflicting, stakeholder interests when 
making decisions to deliver long-term sustainable success. 
Every decision the Board makes will not necessarily result in 
a positive outcome for all stakeholders; however, the Board 
aims to treat stakeholders fairly and consistently, guided 
by GPE’s purpose, values and strategic priorities, and the  
long-term interests of the Company.
Board processes
While the Board will engage directly with stakeholders 
on certain issues, stakeholder engagement will often take 
place at an operational level, with the Board receiving regular 
updates on stakeholder views from the Executive Directors 
and senior management.
As part of our Director induction process, Directors receive 
a briefing and induction materials regarding their duties 
under s.172. Training has further been delivered by the 
Company Secretariat team to management to ensure that 
they understand the duties of the Board and the importance 
of s.172(1) matters in GPE’s strategy discussions and decision 
making. Board papers for all key decisions are required 
to include a specific section reviewing the impact of the 
proposal on relevant stakeholder groups as well as other 
s.172(1) considerations.
Page 104 sets out some examples of how the Board has 
considered s.172(1) matters in its decision making in 2023/24.
Section 172(1) statement
The Directors have acted in the way that they considered, 
in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success 
of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole 
and, in doing so, have had regard, amongst other matters, 
to those matters set out in section 172(1)(a) to (f) of the 
Companies Act 2006, being:
	
– the likely consequences of any decision in the long term;
	
– the interests of the Company’s employees;
	
– the need to foster the Company’s business relationships 
with suppliers, customers and others;
	
– the impact of the Company’s operations on the 
community and the environment;
	
– the desirability of the Company maintaining a reputation 
for high standards of business conduct; and
	
– the need to act fairly as between members of the Company.
Our stakeholders
As explained on pages 69 to 71, GPE has identified its key 
stakeholders as being its: investors, people, customers, 
JV partners, communities, local planning authorities and 
suppliers. Building and nurturing these relationships based 
on professionalism, fair dealing and integrity is critical 
to our success.
72
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Non-financial and sustainability information statement
This table is disclosed on a voluntary basis and signposts related non-financial and sustainability information in this report 
and further reading on our website.
Reporting area1
Policies
Website
Reference in 2024 Annual Report
1. Environmental  
and sustainability 
matters
Sustainability Policy Statement
Our Brief for Creating 
Sustainable Spaces 
Our Guiding Principles of Design
Sustainability Statement of Intent
Our Roadmap to Net Zero
Task Force on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Streamlined Energy and Carbon 
Reporting (SECR) disclosure
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability/ 
our-approach
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
investment-case/our-guiding-
principles
See more about sustainability, 
including our updated Roadmap  
to Net Zero on pages 37 to 62 
See our SECR disclosures 
on pages 44 to 47 
See our response to the TCFD 
Recommendations on pages 52 to 61
Additional information in response 
to the requirements of s414CB(2A) 
climate-related financial disclosures 
(a–h) can be found on pages 38, 39, 
42 to 47 and 52 to 61
2. Employees
Our values
Diversity Policy
Our People Plan
Personal Development Plans
www.gpe.co.uk/our-people/ 
our-values
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
governance
www.gpe.co.uk/our-people/
diversity-inclusion
www.gpe.co.uk/our-people
See more about our values  
on pages 03 and 63
See more about people and culture  
on pages 63 to 68 and 110 to 113
See more about diversity and inclusion 
on pages 67 and 68
3. Human rights
Supplier Code of Conduct
Annual Modern Slavery Statement
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/ 
our-relationships/our-service-
partners
www.gpe.co.uk/our-modern-
slavery-statement
See more about how we behave, 
human rights and supplier stewardship 
on page 105
See more about mitigating  
the risk of modern slavery  
on pages 51 and 105
See more about our suppliers 
on page 71
4. Social
Social Impact Strategy
Creating Sustainable  
Relationships
GPE Standard Supply Terms
Health and Safety Policy
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/our-
relationships/our-service-partners
www.gpe.co.uk/health-safety
See more about our stakeholder 
relationships on pages 69 to 71
See more about communities 
on pages 48, 50, 51 and 71
See more about our Social Impact 
Strategy on pages 50 and 51
See more about our suppliers 
on page 71
See more about providing safe, 
healthy and secure environments 
on page 49
5. Anti-corruption 
and anti-bribery
Financial Crime Policy
Ethics and Whistleblowing Policies
Gifts and Hospitality Policy
Use of GPE Suppliers Policy
Conflicts of Interest Policy
Inside Information and  
Share Dealing Policy
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
governance
See more about anti-corruption 
and anti-bribery matters  
on pages 105 and 120
See more about our Financial Crime, 
Ethics and Whistleblowing Policies 
on page 120
6. Business model
www.gpe.co.uk/why-gpe/ 
our-brand
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
investment-case
See more about how we create value 
on pages 12 and 13
7. Principal risks  
and uncertainties
Group Risk Management Policy
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
governance
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
investment-case/our-strategy
See more about our approach to risk 
on pages 74 to 87 
8. Non-financial 
key performance 
indicators
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
investment-case/key-
performance-indicators
See more about our KPIs  
on pages 16 and 17
See more about our near-term 
strategic priorities on  
pages 14 and 15
1.	 Board oversight of these policies and matters is also covered through ‘What we did in 2023/24’ on pages 106 and 107.
Strategic Report – Annual review
73
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk
The successful management of risk is critical for the 
Group to deliver its strategic priorities. Whilst the ultimate 
responsibility for risk management rests with the Board, 
the effective day-to-day management of risk is integral 
to the way we do business and the culture of our team.
Our attitude to risk is one of collective responsibility, with the 
identification and management of risks and opportunities 
being part of the mindset of the GPE team. Our organisational 
structure, including close involvement of senior management 
in all significant decisions and in-house management of our 
development, portfolio and occupational service activities, 
together with our prudent and analytical approach, is designed 
to align the Group’s interests with those of shareholders.
Setting and monitoring our ‘risk appetite’
The Group’s overarching risk appetite is set in the context that we 
focus on a single market, that of central London, operating out of 
a single head office within close proximity to all of our activities. 
Central London’s real estate markets have historically been 
highly cyclical and, as a result, we apply a disciplined approach 
to our capital allocation and managing our operational risk, 
in particular our development exposure, in tune with prevailing 
market conditions. Furthermore, we aim to operate with low 
financial risk by maintaining conservative financial leverage. 
Further details regarding our management of financial risks can 
be found in Note 16 to the Financial Statements on page 172.
We use a suite of key operational parameters as an 
important tool to set and then measure the Group’s risk 
profile. These parameters consider, amongst other matters, 
the Group’s size, financial gearing, interest and fixed charge 
cover, level of speculative and total development exposure, 
level of Flex exposure and single asset concentration risk. 
These parameters are revisited annually as part of the 
Board’s strategy review and are regularly reviewed at Board 
meetings. We monitor the Group’s actual and forecast 
position over a five-year period against these parameters.
We set a target risk position for each of our principal risks 
to determine whether the net risk position of each principal 
risk is within the Board’s risk appetite level, and to determine 
any appropriate risk response.
Our risk culture and how we manage our risks
Our overarching risk management process comprises 
four main stages, as summarised in the diagram below. 
We believe that effective management of risk is based 
1
4
2
3
Risk identification
	
– Identification and description of 
significant and emerging risks that 
could affect GPE’s key objectives
	
– Risks categorised with assignment 
of accountabilities and executive 
ownership of principal risks
Risk monitoring, reporting and escalation
	
– Risks documented, reported and monitored 
on a regular basis by management, 
Executive Committee, Audit Committee 
and Board
	
– New risks and significant changes to 
risk profiles escalated as appropriate
Risk assessment
	
– Potential impact and likelihood of 
risk assessed using defined criteria
	
– Principal risks assessed on a gross, 
net and target risk basis
Risk response
	
– Appropriate response determined 
with reference to risk appetite
	
– Risk response may include Treat, 
Transfer, Terminate or Tolerate
Communication  
and  
consultation
on a ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approach with 
appropriate controls and oversight, as outlined on page 75, 
which include:
	
– our strategy setting process; 
	
– the quality of our people and culture;
	
– established procedures and internal controls;
	
– policies for highlighting and controlling risks;
	
– oversight by the Board, Committees and management; and
	
– ongoing review of market conditions and the property cycle. 
Moreover, risk management is an integral part of all our activities. 
We consider risks and, more positively, where these might also 
provide opportunities, as part of every business decision we make, 
including how they would affect the achievement of our strategic 
priorities and the long-term performance of our business.
Six-monthly assessment of principal and emerging 
risks, opportunities and effectiveness of controls
As part of a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks 
facing the Group, at the half-year and year end, the Executive 
Committee, Audit Committee and Board formally review the 
Group’s principal and emerging risks, including those that would 
threaten its business model, future performance, solvency 
or liquidity and reputation. Importantly, part of this review 
is the consideration of:
	
– the internal operational controls in place to mitigate 
the principal risks, how key controls have operated in the  
preceding six months and additional activities and 
controls to further reduce risks where desirable, including 
any instances where net risk assessments may exceed 
the target risk position;
	
– consideration of any emerging risks and opportunities; and
	
– the Board’s ongoing monitoring of these risks.
Whilst emerging risks and opportunities are considered 
as part of this formal six-monthly assessment, the Board 
spends additional time at scheduled Board meetings on 
‘blue sky’ thinking and consideration of possible emerging 
risks. Executive Committee members are tasked to provide 
a summary in their regular Board updates of the three areas 
concerning and exciting them the most. We also ask our 
functional Directors and Heads of Department the same 
question to continually challenge ourselves as to how 
we should evolve. Emerging risks are also considered by 
the Board as part of its annual strategy review. Further  
information on emerging risks can be found on page 77.
74
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Board oversight of risk
Business risk
Nomination Committee
Audit Committee
Board
Remuneration Committee
Operational Committee oversight
Weekly/Monthly
Development management
Portfolio management
Investment management
Financial management
Customer experience & relationships
Inclusion Committee
Quarterly
Health and safety
Development management review
Portfolio management review
Sustainability
Social impact
Executive Committee
High-level risk assessment  
framework
Strict approval requirements
Extensive documentation  
to support decisions
Formal policies and procedures  
consistently applied
Defined performance indicators  
with sensitivity analysis
External review of key  
controls/internal audit
Observations from the  
external auditor
Whistleblowing Policy
Focused market expertise
Open communication
Transparent disclosure  
with stakeholders
Integrity in business conduct
Interests aligned with shareholders
Qualified and experienced  
personnel with specific roles
Intense Development,  
Portfolio Management, Leasing  
and Customer Experience teams
Conservative attitude  
to capital deployment
Analytical rigour
Investment return benchmarks
Debt leverage, covenant  
compliance and liquidity limits
Regular review of business plans,  
dashboard lead indicators  
and operational parameters
Occupancy targets
Development appraisal parameters
Leasing objectives and  
customer covenant testing
People and culture  
guided by our values
Procedures and  
internal controls
Policies for highlighting  
and controlling risk
Strategic Report – Annual review
75
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
With volatile macro conditions across the global landscape, 
the Board and the Audit Committee have overseen the 
Company’s response to the challenging macro environment, 
including persistently higher inflation and interest rates, which 
have driven up property yields, and the UK entering a shallow 
recession. This has included actions taken to mitigate risks but 
also to position GPE to take advantage of the opportunities 
arising from uncertain markets and the evolution of the 
property cycle.
The Board and Audit Committee continue to monitor  
macro-economic and political risks, including those risks 
arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, conflict in the Middle 
East and other geopolitical tensions, along with their potential 
impacts on the UK economy, our operations and London’s 
attractiveness. Further details on market impacts can be 
found in ‘Our markets’ on pages 21 and 22 and our viability 
assessment on page 88.
Our principal risks remain largely unchanged from the prior 
year when we took the opportunity to reframe, consolidate 
and simplify several principal risks while reflecting the 
increased emphasis of macro-economic uncertainty in the 
risk landscape. Amongst other changes, this included the 
introduction of a standalone ‘Adverse macro-economic 
environment’ principal risk. We have since revised the 
descriptions and assessments of some of our principal 
risks to reflect how they evolved over the past 12 months. 
Key changes include the following: 
	
– our risk assessment of ‘Adverse macro-economic 
environment’ increased at the half year. However, in view of 
moderating inflation, anticipated interest rate cuts later in 
2024 and stabilising yields, alongside improved sentiment, 
rebased property valuations and healthy customer demand 
(amidst a tightening supply of prime space and rising 
rents), our assessment of macro-economic risks has now, 
on balance, reduced back to a level comparable to where 
it was 12 months ago. While macro-economic risks remain, 
we believe that GPE is well positioned to take advantage 
of accretive acquisition opportunities presented by 
market conditions and the anticipated inflection in the 
property cycle;
	
– amidst volatile macro-uncertainty, the need to ensure 
the appeal of the London Stock Exchange to investors and 
issuers has been the subject of much high profile discussion. 
In this context, the risk of diminishing attractiveness of the 
London Stock Exchange potentially limiting the availability 
of capital has therefore been incorporated in our ‘Adverse 
macro-economic environment’ risk;
	
– the ‘Poor capital allocation decisions and/or misreading 
market conditions’ risk has been updated to expressly 
reference the risk of our failing to read and respond to 
the evolution of the property cycle. Our assessment of this 
risk has reduced on balance due to increased gearing being 
offset by less volatile market conditions, stabilising property 
valuations, and rebased residual values increasing forecast 
development returns. Market conditions are also expected 
to present opportunities for GPE to purchase assets at 
attractive pricing; 
Likelihood
Low
Medium
High
Low
High
Medium
Impact
Principal risk
1
Failure to meet customer needs
2
Climate change and decarbonisation
3
London attractiveness
4
Adverse macro-economic environment
5
Poor capital allocation decisions and/or misreading 
market conditions
6
Failure to profitably deliver the development  
and/or refurbishment programme
7
People
8
Health and safety
9
Cyber security and infrastructure failure
10 Failure to profitably deliver the Flex Strategy
Net risk heatmap
2
3
4
5
7
Net risk rating as assessed after existing controls and mitigation
1
Risk severity
Medium
Low
High
9
10
1
8
6
76
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

	
– as we progress the growth of our Flex business and 
associated refurbishment activities, our ‘Failure to 
profitably deliver the development programme’ risk 
has been expanded to also capture the risk of our not 
translating the growing refurbishment programme 
into profitable schemes;
	
– our assessment of the ‘Failure to profitably deliver the 
development and/or refurbishment programme’ risk has 
reduced overall with the progress of our development 
pipeline (planning now having been secured for our three 
major HQ development schemes), construction costs 
stabilising, expected interest rate cuts and re-based residual 
land values supporting the profitability of developments. 
The business is live to the increasingly challenging planning 
environment which is a key consideration in acquisition 
decisions and related appraisals; and
	
– the ‘Failure to profitably deliver the Flex Strategy’ risk 
has also been updated to capture the risk that failing to 
deliver our target Flex growth will impact the delivery of 
the Flex strategy and our ability to generate appropriate 
risk adjusted returns.
A description of the Group’s principal risks, and a summary 
of the key controls and steps taken to mitigate those risks, 
is shown on pages 78 to 87. The likelihood and impact of each 
principal risk is assessed on a gross, net (taking account 
of the Group’s existing controls and mitigations) and target 
risk basis (to determine whether the net risk position is within 
the Board’s appetite level). The net risk assessment for each 
principal risk is shown on the heatmap on page 76.
The Board’s ongoing monitoring of the 
Group’s principal risks and controls
Ongoing monitoring of our principal risks and controls 
by the Board is undertaken through:
	
– relatively low levels of authority for transactions 
requiring Board approval, with investment transactions 
and development approvals requiring, amongst other 
matters, consideration of the impact on financial 
leverage, interest cover and portfolio risk/composition;
	
– the Executive Committee’s oversight of all day-to-day 
significant decisions;
	
– the Chief Executive reporting on the market conditions 
dashboard, operational parameters, sustainability 
and digital, IT and innovation activities, as appropriate, 
at each scheduled Board meeting;
	
– members of the Executive Committee regularly providing 
a review of the development programme, occupational 
markets and key property matters to the Board;
	
– the Chief Financial & Operating Officer reporting 
on Group forecasts, including actual and prospective 
leverage metrics, HR, Flex, customer experience, 
marketing and social impact matters at scheduled 
Board meetings;
	
– the Executive Director reporting on the customer 
watch list and delinquencies, voids and vacancy rates, 
health and safety matters and new business developments 
at scheduled Board meetings; 
	
– the Executive Directors communicating with the Board 
on any significant market and operational matters 
between Board meetings;
	
– senior managers attending the Board and Committee 
meetings as appropriate to discuss specific risks 
across the business, such as sustainability, health and 
safety, regulatory, people and cyber risks, or relating 
to transactions;
	
– the Audit Committee meeting with the valuers at least 
twice a year to better understand market conditions 
and challenge the assumptions underlying the 
valuation; and
	
– the Audit Committee receiving internal audit reports 
on key risk and control areas and observations from 
the external auditor.
Board consideration of emerging risks
As explained on page 74, the Board regularly considers 
emerging risks and opportunities which could impact 
the business. Whilst risks relating to structural market changes 
and short and medium-term climate change are considered 
within our principal risks, we have also spent time discussing 
emerging risks across a number of themes, examples of 
which are set out below:
	
– technological advances including artificial intelligence, 
the emergence of the metaverse and other disruptive 
technologies could impact the quantum and nature of 
demand for work space in central London. Failure to evolve 
quickly enough could also result in the loss of customers 
to competitors. Our Digital, Technology and Innovation 
Strategy is designed to identify innovation opportunities 
for GPE to enhance its offer and demand;
	
– the long-term impacts of climate change could impact 
the ability to travel to, live, work and shop in central 
London. Our approach to climate resilience is set out in our 
Sustainability Statement of Intent, updated Roadmap to 
Net Zero and Our Brief for Creating Sustainable Spaces;
	
– deglobalisation resulting from geopolitical tensions could 
lead to recognised world centres becoming less relevant, 
which could impact London’s status as a capital city and 
global gateway. Geopolitical risks could restrict capital 
flows, adversely impact investment markets and impact 
the availability of materials, labour and energy security;
	
– changes to tax and economic policies given current 
levels of government debt and/or as a consequence of 
a general election in 2024 could result in increases in sales 
taxes, stamp duty, business rates and corporation tax 
and adversely impact the real estate market, occupier 
demand and GPE returns; and
	
– increasing regulation, reporting and assurance requirements 
could increase operational costs and constrain resources, 
impacting returns.
Strategic Report – Annual review
77
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
How we manage principal risks and uncertainties
Principal risk
Strategic priorities
How we monitor and manage risk
Failure to meet customer needs
We fail to identify and react 
effectively to shifting patterns of 
workspace use and/or understand 
and provide spaces that meet quickly 
evolving customer needs, including 
potential longer-term structural 
changes in working and/or retail 
practices that change the level 
and nature of demand for space 
in central London. This could lead 
to GPE failing to deliver space and 
lease terms that customers want 
and/or an inappropriate mix of Flex 
versus traditional space, resulting in 
poor investment returns, potentially 
stranded assets and losing customers 
to competitors.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– HQ repositioning and Flex office strategy to meet evolving customer demand.
	
– Quarterly review of individual property business plans and the market 
more generally.
	
– Portfolio Management, Leasing, Flex and Customer Experience quarterly 
updates to the Executive Committee with reporting at scheduled 
Board meetings.
	
– Board and management review of GPE’s flexible space offer across 
the portfolio, including broadening our product offer.
	
– The Group’s in-house Customer Experience team has proactive engagement 
with customers to understand their occupational needs and requirements 
with a focus on retaining income, including through meetings and regular 
customer surveys which help us track our Net Promoter Score. Includes 
proactive communication with customers to manage the impacts of 
building works and refurbishments.
	
– Cross-functional customer and building action plans are regularly reviewed 
to align the customer strategy with customer needs.
	
– Programme of engagement for members of the Executive Committee to 
meet with a selection of customers across the portfolio at least once a year.
	
– Working with potential customers to address their needs and aspirations 
during design stages of projects. Board and management oversight of the 
development and implementation of our Digital, Technology and Innovation 
Strategy and related initiatives.
	
– Design (supported by a specialist fit-out team) and innovation activities 
in the areas of sustainability, technology, wellbeing and experience.
	
– Customer First programme and strategy in place, with dedicated leadership, 
relationship management and insights capabilities supported by our customer 
relationship management system. Customer service proposition and 
standards in place to ensure consistency when delivering the strategy.
	
– Board annual strategy review, including market updates received from 
third parties.
	
– New ‘We value every customer’ corporate value adopted in the year to 
reflect and reinforce our Customer First approach. 
Climate change and decarbonisation
The need to decarbonise our business 
increases the cost of our activities 
through the need to retro-fit buildings 
to improve their sustainability 
credentials (e.g. minimum energy 
efficiency standards and building 
ratings) and make them resilient to  
the impact of climate change. This  
also reduces our ability to redevelop 
due to planning restrictions, increased 
regulation (including additional 
reporting obligations and costs) 
and stakeholder expectations, 
the increased cost of low carbon 
technology/materials (including 
utilisation of the circular economy) 
and potentially the pricing of carbon. 
Failure to meet the climate challenge 
could impact our ability to raise 
capital, deliver buildings, reduce 
the demand for the buildings we 
own, cause significant reputational 
damage and result in exposure 
to environmental activism and 
potentially stranded assets.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Regular Board and Executive Committee review of Sustainability Policy 
and response to climate risk.
	
– Sustainability Committee meets quarterly to consider strategy in 
respect of climate change-related risks. Its Portfolio and Development 
sub-committees meet regularly and report to the Sustainability 
Committee on progress.
	
– Social Impact Committee meets quarterly to oversee the delivery  
of our Social Impact Strategy.
	
– Dedicated Sustainability and Social Impact Director on the Executive 
Committee supported by Sustainability Lead.
	
– Design Review meetings to review design brief for all buildings to ensure 
that forthcoming sustainability risks are considered.
	
– Sustainable Spaces Brief and Sustainability Strategy in place with climate 
resilience strategy.
	
– Updated Roadmap to Net Zero with challenging embodied carbon and 
energy intensity targets. Decarbonisation Fund and internal carbon 
price established to support initiatives including energy efficiency  
retro-fitting in existing buildings.
	
– ESG-linked RCF and annual bonus measures to support delivery of 
decarbonisation and reduction in energy consumption within the business.
	
– Programme of ESG investor engagement in place, with regular review 
of reporting requirements and participation in investor indices.
	
– Steering group to assess, manage and monitor EPC risks across the 
portfolio both to estimate compliance costs and to inform our buy, 
hold and sell strategy and decisions.
	
– Participation in industry bodies to influence policy and drive innovation.
78
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Net risk movement  
over the last 12 months
Commentary
No change
With hybrid working here to stay, and customers having more choices about where they work, our spaces need to 
provide compelling reasons to come into the office. With average office rents only c.5%–10% of a typical London 
business’ salary cost, and the office environment a key tool in attracting and retaining talent, we anticipate that 
competition for the very best spaces will remain healthy. We continue to witness a growing divergence between the 
prospects of the best spaces versus the rest, and we believe this is set to widen further as customers seek out sustainable 
and well designed, prime spaces, of which there is a marked shortage, particularly in the West End.
Our strategy of focusing on the best spaces, both through our development of large, best-in-class HQ buildings and 
smaller fitted units, often with higher service levels, is underpinned by the need to meet the evolving demands of our 
customers. To ensure we are delivering the spaces our customers want, we have continued to develop our Customer 
First approach and embed this into our culture and across our business operations. This has included, amongst other 
things, a refresh of our Fully Managed branding, the reorganisation and strengthening of our teams with new hires 
and promotions, and the further roll out of our new customer service proposition and associated service standards 
supported by our Customer Relationship Management System.
Reflecting how our Customer First approach is becoming entrenched in our culture, we also adopted a new GPE 
Value in the year – ‘We value every customer’.
Testament to our approach, we had a good leasing year, completing 66 new leases and renewals, and securing 
£22.5 million of rent at a 9.1% premium to March 2023 ERVs, whilst continuing the successful roll-out of our flexible 
space offering.
We continue to design and innovate in the areas of sustainability, technology, wellbeing and service provision. During the 
year, we expanded our flexible offerings in line with quickly evolving customer demand, including the further roll-out 
of our Fully Managed offer. Together with planned acquisitions, we are aiming to expand our Flex office offering to 
more than one million sq ft.
A close relationship with our customers is vital to our success. We were pleased by this year’s independent customer 
satisfaction survey, which updated our understanding of how our customers view their buildings and the services 
we provide. Our office Net Promoter Score remained high (albeit down from last year’s score) at +30.2, significantly 
above the office industry average of +6.9.
No change
With the built environment contributing approximately 40% of the UK’s carbon footprint and the climate change 
debate being both a moral and economic imperative, particularly for our customers and other stakeholders, we have 
been further expanding our sustainability commitments and activities. Our Statement of Intent ‘The Time is Now’ 
was launched in 2020. Since then, our approach and thinking has developed considerably. In our recently released 
version 2.0, we set out our increased ambitions to reduce our carbon impacts and revised timelines in which to 
achieve them. 
For further details, see pages 39 to 43.
Our Sustainable Finance Framework governs our potential future debt issuance, with the aim of financing projects 
that have a positive environmental and/or social impact. This builds on our ESG-linked revolving credit facility, which 
includes targets to reduce embodied carbon from our new developments and major refurbishments and to improve 
biodiversity across our portfolio. The rate of interest we pay on this facility depends on our performance against these 
targets. Furthermore, sustainability targets have been included within the annual bonus scorecard of the whole GPE 
team and are being used to assess levels of remuneration. Good progress has been made against the 2023/24 annual 
targets, as set out on pages 17, 41, 43 and 130.
We continue to work to improve the number of our buildings rated for their sustainability credentials. The UK Government 
has previously announced its intention that all buildings will require an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating 
of B or above by 2030. As a result, we have created individual asset plans to proactively improve our EPC ratings to meet 
government and broader stakeholder expectations, to assess potential exposures and inform our hold/sell strategies. 
We expect the sustainability challenge to provide us with potential opportunities to acquire orphaned assets 
needing a sustainability solution.
Strategic Report – Annual review
79
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
How we manage principal risks and uncertainties continued
Principal risk
Strategic priorities
How we monitor and manage risk
London attractiveness
London’s appeal may be impacted by 
reduced appetite to travel to, work 
and shop in London due to changes in 
working patterns, changes in government 
policies or political instability, the rise of 
alternative destinations for international 
trade, the impact of civil unrest, terrorism, 
a pandemic, the impact of long-term 
climate change (including risk of flooding), 
disruption to energy supplies and/or the 
relative expense of operating in London. 
This results in reduced international capital 
flows into London, leading to a lack of 
investment and/or capital flight (including 
diminished appeal of the London Stock 
Exchange), lower leasing demand and 
elevated vacancy, decreasing income, 
asset values and development viability.
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Board annual strategy review with regular economic and market 
updates received from third parties.
	
– Strategic financial forecasts are updated prior to each Board meeting 
with scenario planning for different economic cycles and eventualities. 
	
– Regular review of strategic priorities and transactions in light of the 
Group’s dashboard of lead indicators and operational parameters.
	
– Key London indicators are monitored to help inform GPE’s view of 
London’s economy.
	
– The impacts of international trading relationships, supply chain disruption 
and geopolitical issues continue to be monitored and reported to the 
Executive Committee and Board.
	
– Active participation in industry groups to promote London.
	
– Business Continuity Plan in place to manage our response to a major 
incident or disruption.
Adverse macro-economic environment 
Adverse macro-economic conditions 
driven by events such as geopolitical 
tensions (including conflicts in the Ukraine 
and Middle East), UK political instability 
or government policy and supply chain 
disruption result in weakened UK GDP 
growth and recession. Elevated inflation 
(including energy prices), persistently 
higher interest rates and reduced 
consumer spending impair investor and 
occupier demand, increase customer 
and supplier failure, limit the availability 
and increase the costs of debt financing, 
curtail income and reduce asset values 
and returns. As a result, GPE’s financial 
leverage increases and potentially results 
in limited availability of capital (including 
the reduced attractiveness of the London 
Stock Exchange) and/or a breach of our 
banking covenants.
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Regular review of financing and capital structure, including gearing levels, 
by the Chief Financial & Operating Officer and Executive Committee.
	
– Board annual strategy review including regular economic and market 
updates received from third parties.
	
– Strategic financial forecasts are updated prior to each scheduled 
Board meeting with scenario planning for different economic cycles 
and eventualities.
	
– Regular review of strategic priorities and transactions in light of the 
Group’s dashboard of lead indicators and operational parameters.
	
– Regular review of current and forecast debt, hedging levels and 
financing ratios under various market scenarios.
	
– The Group aims to maintain a consistent policy of conservative 
financial leverage.
	
– Proactive balance sheet management.
	
– Investor relations programme, with regular broker consultation, 
to build a supportive base in the event of future fundraisings.
	
– The Group’s funding measures are diversified across a range of bank 
and bond markets. Sustainable Finance Framework in place for 
future debt issuances. During the year, the Group secured a new 
£250 million term loan and £200 million backstop facility.
	
– Selection of customers, contractors and suppliers based on 
creditworthiness and close monitoring of rent and service charge 
collection rates.
80
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Net risk movement  
over the last 12 months
Commentary
No change
London generates around a quarter of UK GDP and is one of the world’s leading commercial, creative and financial 
centres, with a deep pool of talent. It has one of the world’s largest commercial real estate markets, with around 
440 million sq ft of office and retail property attracting a deep and diverse mix of customers and property investors, 
many from overseas. London remains one of the leading global destinations for real estate investment due to its 
combination of relative value, strong legal system, time zone advantages, international connectivity and a welcoming 
attitude to global businesses.
Factors such as the impact of geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruption, lower GDP forecasts, inflationary pressures, 
elevated interest rates and rising costs of living have weighed on sentiment and impacted activity in our investment 
markets. However, London is resilient, our leasing activity remains robust and West End footfall and tourism has returned 
to near pre-pandemic levels. Central London is busy and office workers have returned, with hybrid working now 
the norm. With the macro-economic environment anticipated to improve during 2024, we believe that London’s 
attraction as a global cultural and business centre is undiminished.
No change
Our markets remained challenging over the course of the financial year. However, inflation has moderated, interest rate 
cuts are anticipated over the course of 2024 and we believe yields are stabilising. This, alongside improved sentiment, 
rebased property valuations and healthy customer demand amidst a tightening supply of prime space and rising 
rents, has resulted in our assessment of macro-economic risks being comparable to where it was 12 months ago.
Given this backdrop, our property values reduced by 12.1%, on a like-for-like basis, over the year driven by the impact of 
elevated interest rates on property yields. Whilst values were down, GPE delivered a strong leasing year and our portfolio 
ERVs continued to grow, up 3.8% in the year, reflecting the continued shortage of high quality space across our markets.
Over the long term, real estate markets have historically been cyclical, and London has been no exception to this. 
As a result, we have consistently adopted a conservative approach to financial leverage. As at 31 March 2024, 
our property LTV was 32.6%, net gearing was 46.8% and interest cover was 3.7 times. Accordingly, we have substantial 
headroom above our Group debt covenants. We estimate property values could fall around 34% before Group 
debt covenants could be endangered, even before factoring in mitigating management actions. The Group also 
has significant financial capacity with liquidity of £633 million (including joint ventures), comprising unrestricted 
cash of £30.4 million and undrawn committed credit facilities of £603.0 million.
While macro-economic risks remain, we believe that GPE is well positioned to take advantage of accretive acquisition 
opportunities presented by market conditions and the anticipated inflection in the property cycle.
Strategic Report – Annual review
81
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
How we manage principal risks and uncertainties continued
Principal risk
Strategic priorities
How we monitor and manage risk
Poor capital allocation decisions and/or misreading market conditions 
We make poor decisions regarding 
the allocation of capital and/or fail 
to adequately read the property cycle 
or market conditions (including global 
investor appetite for commercial 
real estate and offices) such that our 
leasing, buying, selling or development 
activities deliver inadequate investment 
returns, restrict our ability to finance 
our operations or result in inappropriate 
asset concentration, building mix and/
or level of development undertaken 
as a percentage of the portfolio.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Board annual strategy review including regular economic and market 
updates received from third parties.
	
– Strategy review forecast on an asset-by-asset basis to provide a business 
plan for each individual property which is subsequently reviewed against 
the performance of the business as a whole.
	
– Strategic financial forecasts are updated prior to each scheduled 
Board meeting with scenario planning for different economic cycles.
	
– Regular reviews conducted of individual property IRRs, including quarterly 
review of individual property dashboards, and market generally. Quarterly 
review of asset-by-asset business plans to assess future performance 
and to inform hold/sell decision making.
	
– Weekly investment meetings held and regular dialogue maintained  
with key intermediaries. 
	
– Portfolio Management, Flex, Customer Experience, Development and 
Leasing quarterly updates to the Executive Committee with reporting 
at scheduled Board meetings.
	
– Regular review of property cycle by reference to a dashboard 
of lead indicators.
	
– Dedicated in-house team with remit to research submarkets in central 
London, seeking the right balance between investment and development 
opportunities for both current and prospective market conditions.
	
– Detailed due diligence processes for all prospective acquisitions/capital 
expenditure to help ensure appropriate returns. Key decisions are subject 
to Board and/or Executive Committee approval in line with the Group’s 
delegated authorities.
Failure to profitably deliver the development and/or refurbishment programme
We fail to translate the development 
and/or refurbishment pipeline and 
current committed schemes into 
profitable schemes. This may result from 
poor scheme management (including of 
supply chain disruption, the impacts of 
inflation or adverse yield movements), 
an increasingly challenging planning 
and regulatory environment, failure 
to agree acceptable terms with 
freeholders/adjoining owners/other 
stakeholders, poor timing of activity 
and/or inappropriate products for an 
evolving market and customer needs 
(including sustainability expectations). 
This results in reduced development 
and/or refurbishment activity, weak 
leasing performance, reputational 
damage and reducing property returns.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Strategic financial forecasts are updated prior to each scheduled 
Board meeting with scenario planning for different economic cycles.
	
– Development management quarterly updates to the Executive Committee 
with reporting to each scheduled Board meeting.
	
– Regular review of portfolio mix and asset concentration. Adjustment 
of the portfolio as appropriate through undertaking acquisitions and/or 
development projects in joint venture or forward funding.
	
– Regular meetings with key cost advisers, main contractors and subcontractors 
to monitor market conditions. Procurement routes and when to fix prices kept 
under close review.
	
– Prior to committing to a scheme, the Group conducts a detailed financial and 
operational appraisal process which evaluates the expected returns from a 
scheme in light of likely risks. During the course of a scheme, the actual costs 
and estimated returns are regularly monitored to signpost prompt decisions 
on project management, leasing and ownership.
	
– Regular pipeline review meetings between the Development and Portfolio 
Management teams and quarterly asset review sessions.
	
– Selection of contractors and suppliers based on their track record of delivery 
and creditworthiness, corporate responsibility and sustainability credentials.
	
– Post-completion reviews undertaken through Final Appraisal process on 
all developments to identify best practice and areas for improvement.
	
– Regular, proactive engagement with key stakeholders: working closely with 
agents, potential customers, and purchasers to identify and address their 
needs and aspirations, including in respect of safety, sustainability, wellbeing 
and technology during the planning application and design stages; regular 
meetings with local authorities, planning officers and experienced planning 
advisers; early engagement with local residents and community groups, 
adjoining owners and freeholders.
	
– Design Review meetings to review design briefs for all buildings for 
sustainability considerations. All our major developments are subject 
to an appropriate sustainability rating requirement.
	
– Regular review of the prospective performance of individual assets 
and their business plans with joint venture partners.
82
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Net risk movement  
over the last 12 months
Commentary
Decreased
During the year, we committed to the development of Minerva House, SE1 and French Railways House & 50 Jermyn 
Street, SW1. We are also on-site at four Flex refurbishment schemes which are anticipated to deliver 145,000 sq ft of 
Fully Managed space. In total, our HQ development and Flex capex programme provides a strong platform for organic 
growth. Together, our seven on-site schemes will deliver 678,300 sq ft of well designed, tech-enabled and sustainable 
space into a market where prospective supply is increasingly limited. Moreover, with around £120 million of anticipated 
development surplus to come from these schemes, they will provide a strong foundation to the Group’s growth in the 
coming years.
We continue to assess potential HQ development and Flex acquisition opportunities across central London and regularly 
review the forward-look performance of our portfolio to maximise returns. During the year, we acquired £122.9 million 
of new opportunities, including 141 Wardour Street, W1 and the Soho Square Estate, W1. More recently, we exchanged 
contracts to acquire the long leasehold interest at The Courtyard, WC1.
Our assessment of this risk has reduced on balance with increased gearing being offset by volatile market conditions, 
stabilising property valuations and rebased residual values increasing forecast development returns. Market conditions 
are also expected to present opportunities for GPE to purchase assets at attractive pricing. With the return of the 
property cycle, the Board remains focused on the acquisition pipeline and ensuring GPE is well positioned to take 
advantage of accretive acquisitions.
Decreased
During the year, our assessment of the ‘Failure to profitably deliver the development and/or refurbishment programme’ 
risk has reduced overall with the progress of our development pipeline (planning now secured for our three major HQ 
development schemes), construction costs stabilising, expected interest rate cuts and re-based residual land values 
supporting the profitability of developments. The business is live to the increasingly challenging planning environment 
which is a key consideration in acquisition decisions and related appraisals.
Our seven on-site schemes, three HQ developments and four Flex refurbishments will deliver 678,000 sq ft of well designed, 
tech-enabled and sustainable space into a market where prospective supply is increasingly limited. Moreover, we 
have around £120 million of anticipated development surplus to come from these schemes.
To successfully deliver our developments, we work closely with both local authorities and communities to secure 
planning consents to create great new sustainable spaces, helping London to thrive. We aim to engage with local 
authorities in an open, transparent and non-adversarial manner. Furthermore, in line with our Social Impact Strategy, 
as a matter of course, we liaise with community stakeholders to understand their needs and, where possible, we will 
adjust our proposals to take account of comments received. We use planning performance agreements with the 
local planning authority to ensure that our planning applications are determined in a timely manner. 
With planning permissions in place for Minerva House, SE1, French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1 
and 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2, we are now progressing on-site for these schemes. 
The planning environment remains challenging, especially for new build development schemes, where there is an 
increasing preference for ‘retrofit first’. Sustainability is becoming ever more important in the planning process with 
key local authorities declaring climate emergencies. As such, we will look to work with them to support their principles 
of ‘good growth’ and continue to evolve our strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of our development activities, 
including through the use of the circular economy. 
At New City Court, SE1, following an appeal for non-determination, in September 2023, we received confirmation that the 
Planning Inspector’s report recommended the planning applications were refused and the Secretary of State agreed with 
its conclusions. As a result of the planning decision, we are exploring the opportunity to reuse and extend the existing 
building, combining Fully Managed and Ready to Fit spaces, to create a renewed building with exemplary sustainability 
credentials, amenity provision, flexible spaces and far-reaching views from large, landscaped roof terraces.
Strategic Report – Annual review
83
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
How we manage principal risks and uncertainties continued
Principal risk
Strategic priorities
How we monitor and manage risk
People
Failure to attract, incentivise 
and retain high quality, suitably 
diverse and experienced individuals 
negatively impacts our ability 
to deliver our strategic objectives 
and has a detrimental impact on 
our values and inclusive culture. 
Additionally, failure to design and 
implement the right organisational 
structure (structure, skills, resourcing 
levels) will impede our ability to 
achieve our strategic objectives. 
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Regular review is undertaken of the Group’s resourcing requirements, 
performance management, talent review and succession planning.
	
– The Group has a competitive and attractive employee value proposition 
that is strongly linked to performance and values and a formal six‑monthly 
appraisal system to provide regular assessment of individual performance.
	
– Regular benchmarking of remuneration and non-financial packages to 
ensure they remain competitive in the market, supported by shareholder 
adoption of a new remuneration policy in 2023 which is cascaded through 
the business. Cost of living actions taken where appropriate.
	
– Personal development planning and ongoing training support for employees, 
together with focused initiatives to nurture potential successors, including 
talent development, mentoring and coaching programmes.
	
– Clear articulation of GPE values and behaviours which are embedded in key 
people practices. We place strong emphasis on creating an inclusive culture, 
supported by the work of our Inclusion Committee and four employee-led 
impact groups.
	
– Board, Nomination and Executive Committee oversight of our People Plan 
and diversity and inclusion strategy.
	
– Hybrid Working Policy to give employees appropriate flexibility to perform 
their roles.
	
– Focus on people engagement with regular two-way communication 
and responsive employee-focused activities.
Health and safety
A health and safety incident 
(including by our contractors) results  
in loss of life, significant injury or 
widespread infection, and financial 
and/or reputational damage to GPE. 
Furthermore, significant changes 
in health and safety and fire safety 
regulations (including pursuant to the 
Building Safety Act 2022) and practice 
driven by government intervention 
increase compliance and development 
costs and/or risks of non-compliance.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Quarterly Health and Safety Committee meetings are held, with regular 
reporting on health and safety to the Executive Committee and Board, 
including on progress against our Health and Safety Strategy and KPIs.
	
– Regular health and safety site checks are undertaken by internal teams 
and third parties, along with regular senior leadership building tours.
	
– Pre-qualification and competency checks are undertaken for contractors 
and consultants with contractor management processes in place.
	
– Formal reporting on near misses/significant incidents and accidents.
	
– Proactive health and safety KPIs to monitor and track performance 
and drive behaviours.
	
– Annual external cycle of health and safety, asbestos, fire safety and water 
safety risk assessments and surveys.
	
– Online health and safety risk management system in place for the business.
	
– Fire safety management procedures in place.
	
– Activities are undertaken to monitor and raise employee awareness and 
understanding of health and safety matters, including through employee 
engagement surveys.
	
– Comprehensive health and wellbeing programme in place for employees 
with mental health first aiders and an employee assistance programme.
Cyber security and infrastructure failure
A cyber attack or infrastructure 
failure leads to business or network 
disruption within our portfolio or loss 
of information or personal and/or 
customer data. There is the potential 
for greater impact on Fully Managed 
customers, to which we provide 
increased infrastructure support, and 
high-risk customers. This results in 
litigation, reputational damage and/
or financial or regulatory penalties.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
	
– IT and cyber security updates are regularly reported to the Executive 
Committee and the Board, which oversee the implementation of our  
new three-year Digital, Technology & Innovation Strategy approved 
by the Board in April 2024.
	
– Cyber security systems and controls are in place and regularly reviewed, 
with external support, against best practice.
	
– A head office and portfolio IT risk register is maintained.
	
– The Group’s IT Disaster Recovery Plan is regularly reviewed and tested 
and recovery of data at an off-site recovery centre is tested during the year.
	
– Regular testing of IT security is undertaken, including penetration testing 
of key systems.
	
– The Group’s data is regularly backed up and replicated.
	
– The Group’s Cyber Third Party Management and Security Policy and 
processes are designed to identify and control cyber-related risks 
arising from our third-party relationships.
	
– Employee awareness training on cyber risk is undertaken regularly.
	
– Cyber risk insurance is in place.
	
– Each building has a bespoke Emergency Action Plan, maintaining 
appropriate systems to mitigate any infrastructure failure.
84
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Net risk movement  
over the last 12 months
Commentary
No change
The motivation of our people and maintaining our strong inclusive culture remains fundamental to the delivery of our 
strategic priorities. The strength of our values and appeal of our culture was highlighted with our most recent employee 
survey showing 88% of our people ‘are proud to work at GPE’. While our overall employee engagement scores were 
slightly down from the prior year, participation levels were high with 98% of the GPE team completing the survey. 
To enhance our Customer First approach, as we continue to innovate, digitise our activities and grow our Flex workspace 
offer, we made a number of organisational design changes to support the delivery of our strategic priorities.  
We continue to develop our talent and made several senior hires and internal promotions in our management team  
during the year.
We continue to progress our diversity and inclusion strategy, which forms an integral part of our People Strategy. 
During the year, the Board and Nomination Committee have continued to oversee the implementation of key initiatives 
and the setting of clear representation targets across the Group. See pages 68, 112 and 113 for further details.
The physical and mental wellbeing of our people remains a key priority. We seek to be a caring and supportive employer 
with a comprehensive Wellbeing Programme to support physical and mental health with a focus on de-stigmatising 
the reality of mental health challenges. We have trained mental health first aiders and have introduced innovative 
tools to support the mental health of our employees and family members.
We have continued our Board Engagement Programme to enable the Board to listen and respond to feedback 
from employees and to discuss important matters impacting the business. During the year, we continued the work 
of our four Employee Impact Groups to strengthen our engagement and feedback from under-represented groups, 
overseen by our Inclusion Committee.
We continue to focus on growing the breadth, depth and diversity of our talent, providing focused development 
support where needed in an inclusive environment.
No change
We continue to focus on ensuring that we have a best-in-class and proactive health and safety culture. With the 
introduction of the Fire Safety Act and Building Safety Act and subsequent guidance, we are proactively strengthening 
our practices and procedures in response to requirements. We continue to monitor evolving regulation and assess 
its potential impact on our portfolio.
The Group had two reportable accidents during the year, each of which involved contractors. Where accidents do 
occur, we work with our supply chain on accident investigation to understand lessons learned and opportunities for 
improvement, to consider how the work could have been set up differently and to understand how, as a client, we can 
better support our suppliers.
We continue to undertake activities to raise employee awareness and understanding of health and safety requirements 
and monitor health and safety across the portfolio through a set of proactive key performance indicators. 
No change
Cyber security risk has remained elevated due to the rise in attempted cyber crime amidst geopolitical tensions, combined 
with greater reliance on technology and increased vulnerabilities created by remote and hybrid working. We have 
continued to invest time and resource into our cyber security measures, both in our head office and across our portfolio.
We continue to strengthen the design and operation of our IT controls, including our IT disaster recovery procedures 
in response to recommendations arising from a recent internal audit review.
The Board approved a new Digital, Technology and Innovation Strategy in April 2024, which was presented by GPE’s new 
Director of Digital & Technology. The new strategy will apply for three years and includes goals and objectives to manage 
risk, become a more digitally enabled business and deliver an improved digital customer experience. 
 We regularly consider the potential risks arising from technological advances, such as artificial intelligence, as well as 
the opportunities this may present for our business and our customers.
Strategic Report – Annual review
85
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
How we manage principal risks and uncertainties continued
Principal risk
Strategic priorities
How we monitor and manage risk
Failure to profitably deliver the Flex Strategy
The failure to appropriately structure 
our activities, achieve appropriate 
pricing, maximise operational 
efficiencies, deliver target growth or 
adequately control costs impacts the 
delivery of our Flex office strategy and 
our ability to generate appropriate 
risk-adjusted returns. Further, as 
we scale up our Flex office delivery 
and increase our focus on service 
provision, the failure by GPE and/
or its service partners to deliver high 
quality service impacts customer 
satisfaction, demand and retention 
and asset values.
1
Progress  
sustainability 
and innovation 
agenda
2
Enhance 
portfolio 
through sales 
and acquisitions
3
Deliver on our 
Flex ambition
4
Embed our 
Customer 
First approach
5
Deliver and lease 
the committed  
schemes
6
Prepare 
the pipeline
	
– Board and management oversight of the development and implementation 
of the Flex strategy and business plan with regular review of Flex KPIs to 
monitor performance.
	
– Board annual strategy review with regular market updates.
	
– Regular Flex updates and formal quarterly updates to the Executive 
Committee with reporting at scheduled Board meetings.
	
– Dedicated Flex leadership and team in place under a new organisational 
structure with senior design and delivery, customer relationship and retention 
and operational capabilities. Regular review of skills and capabilities to 
ensure appropriate resourcing is in place for the effective delivery of service 
and experience.
	
– Customer First programme and strategy in place, led by our dedicated 
Customer Experience team, to drive customer engagement and insight 
and to ensure our customers’ occupational needs are met.
	
– Quarterly review of individual assets plans and the market generally.
	
– Close management oversight of costs and services, including design 
and delivery.
	
– Flex Design Guidelines & Principles in place to provide consistency 
and increase efficiencies across the portfolio.
	
– Board and management oversight of our Digital, Technology and 
Innovation Strategy and related initiatives to support customer needs.
86
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Net risk movement  
over the last 12 months
Commentary
No change
To profitably deliver our Flex Strategy and scale up our Flex operations, we have improved our ability to deliver this 
operationally intensive side of our business, control the associated cost base and generate appropriate risk-adjusted 
returns. We have also recruited additional expertise to focus on improving management information, budgeting, 
customer experience and delivery.
In order to expand our Flex office offers, and meet our ambitious targets for growth, we are on-site at four refurbishments 
to provide new dedicated Fully Managed spaces, as well as converting a significant number of individual floors 
across our portfolio. During the year, we acquired £122.9 million of new opportunities, including 141 Wardour Street, 
W1 and Bramah House, SE1 for our Fully Managed offerings. More recently, we exchanged contracts to acquire the 
leasehold interest at The Courtyard, WC1 which will form a new Flex cluster with our other Flex building on Alfred Place.
During the year, including our Flex Partnerships, we increased our committed Flex offerings across the portfolio, 
and they now total 503,000 sq ft (or approximately 23.5 % of our office portfolio). In total, we signed £13.7 million 
of new leases in our Flex space, which included five Fitted and 24 Fully Managed leases at a combined 12.3% ahead 
of March 2023 ERV.
We continue to evolve our operating model and closely monitor costs and prospective risk-adjusted returns 
as we refine our offer. A Flex management pack with operational KPIs has been further developed to monitor 
performance and maximise returns.
To date, we remain encouraged by the leasing performance and feedback we have had for our products, 
which was reflected in this year’s independent customer satisfaction survey, where our Net Promoter Score 
remained high, particularly for our Flex offers. The ongoing development of our Customer First programme is 
designed to ensure continuous feedback and provide valuable insight to help us deliver the type and quality 
of services our customers demand.
Strategic Report – Annual review
87
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our approach to risk continued
Viability statement
Assessment of the Group’s prospects
In accordance with Provision 31 of the 2018 UK Corporate 
Governance Code, the Board has assessed the prospects 
of the Group over a longer period than the 12 months required 
by the ‘Going Concern’ provision. The work conducted for 
this longer-term assessment supports the Board’s statements 
on both viability, as set out below, and going concern, as set 
out on page 152.
The Group’s future prospects are assessed regularly and at an 
annual strategy review in late March. This review is led by the 
Chief Executive drawing on expertise across the Group. This year 
it included an assessment of the macro-economic environment, 
forecasts of key property market metrics (including yields and 
rental value movements), annual valuation movements for 
each of our properties, the financial metrics associated with 
our Flex offerings, the costs associated with meeting emerging 
sustainability regulations and a selection of development 
scenarios. It also included a number of market assumptions, 
including base, upside and downside scenarios, to reflect different 
potential economic outcomes, including further disruption 
from political and economic uncertainty, and a number of 
business activity responses, including development activity, 
sales and acquisitions.
The key outputs from this process are full financial statements 
for a five-year forecast period, with a primary focus on the 
first three years. The forecasts are summarised in a dashboard, 
which analyses profits, cash flows, funding requirements, key 
financial ratios, compliance with the REIT rules and headroom 
in respect of the financial covenants contained in the Group’s 
various loan arrangements. The strategy review was considered 
by the Board in March 2024, with updated forecasts, including 
a Going Concern market scenario to reflect the impact of 
an event similar to the 2008/09 financial crisis in severity, 
presented to the Board in May.
The forecasts contain a number of assumptions, including:
	
– estimated year on year movements in rental values and 
yields for each of our properties under a number of scenarios;
	
– the continued conversion of some of our office space 
to our Flex offerings;
	
– the refinancing of the Group’s existing debt facilities as they 
fall due, including its £175 million private placement notes 
maturing in May 2024 and its revolving credit facility maturing 
in January 2027, as disclosed in note 16;
	
– a number of sales and acquisition scenarios with appropriate 
new debt facilities to support growth;
	
– the completion of the Group’s committed development 
programme in line with our most recent estimated 
completion dates and the commencement of certain 
pipeline projects; and
	
– forecast interest rates.
Assessment of risks
The Group’s principal risks are subject to regular review by the 
Executive Committee, the Audit Committee and the Board. 
The review conducted for the preparation of the Annual Report 
and the Viability Statement demonstrated limited change in 
our principal risks over the year.
The risks with the greatest potential impact on the Group’s 
viability were considered as follows (see pages 74 to 87 above):
	
– London attractiveness: we rely on London’s magnetism 
and relative appeal to other financial centres to continue 
to attract global capital, businesses and talent from around 
the world to support demand for our properties; 
	
– Adverse macro-economic environment: a challenging 
economic backdrop could instigate financial stress in our 
key markets materially reducing property values, and the 
viability of Group’s developments, and impairing the Group’s 
income risking a breach of our banking covenants; and
	
– Climate change and decarbonisation: a changing climate 
could impact the resilience of our buildings, impact our 
ability to deliver new developments and reduce the demand 
for the buildings we own.
Assessment of viability
A three-year viability period is considered an optimum balance 
between our need to plan for the long term and the shorter-term 
nature of our active business model, which often includes high 
levels of recycling of our property portfolio, an average lease 
length of around three years and a near-term development 
programme which will be commenced over the same period.
The assessment of viability included stress testing the resilience 
of the Group, and its business model, to the potential impact of 
the risks set out above. Specifically, given the ongoing macro-
economic uncertainty, high inflationary environment and rising 
interest rates, our assessment of viability was based on the 
Group’s performance under a Going Concern market scenario, 
with further sensitivity analysis to understand the resilience 
of the Group to a significant economic shock.
The Going Concern market scenario reduced rental values across 
both offices and retail by 10% and assumed an outward yield shift 
of 50 basis points. When combined, over the three-year period this 
scenario reduced property values by around 15%, with a 32% peak 
to trough from 31 March 2022. The assessment demonstrated that 
given the Group’s low levels of debt and high liquidity, it would be 
able to withstand the impact of this scenario over the period of the 
financial forecast and continue to operate with headroom above 
the financial covenants contained in its various loan arrangements. 
Moreover, this was before any mitigating actions such as property 
sales or pausing of the capital expenditure associated with the 
conversion of office space to the Group’s Flex offerings.
In addition, reverse stress tests were performed, to understand 
how extensive any valuation and income fall would be required to 
extinguish the Group’s liquidity and/or breach the Group’s gearing, 
interest cover ratio or inner borrowing covenants. In the three-year 
period, before any mitigating actions, rental income would need to 
fall by an additional 14% and property values would need to fall by 
a further 17%, before the Group breached its banking covenants.
The assessment also included a review of the potential impact of 
climate change on the Group. Whilst it would be unlikely to affect 
the viability of the Group within the three-year review period, 
we ran a scenario to assess the impact of significant increases 
in the cost of development to meet sustainability requirements 
(an additional 5% on our committed development capex). 
This did not impact our viability assessment.
Viability statement
Based on the Board’s assessments, the Directors confirm that 
they have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able 
to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due 
over the three-year period ending 31 March 2027.
88
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

We are decarbonising  
our business to become  
net zero by 2040
Our updated Roadmap to Net Zero v2.0 sets out, in detail, how we will tackle the 
challenge of decarbonising our business and value chain, collaborating with our 
stakeholders to reduce our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 90% by 2040 before 
reaching net zero.
As a business we recognise that we have more than just a moral obligation to 
decarbonise our business with our customers increasingly holding us to account 
on the sustainability performance of the spaces that they occupy.
In this section:
90
Overview
91
Introduction from the Chair
94
The Board
96
Leadership and purpose
100
Engaging with our investors
102
Engaging with our employees
104
Board consideration of stakeholder 
interests and s.172(1) matters
108
Division of responsibilities
110
Composition, succession and evaluation
116
Audit, risks and internal controls
124
Directors’ remuneration report
144
Report of the Directors
146
Directors’ responsibilities statement
Governance
Governance
89
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Overview
Statement by the Directors on compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code
The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Code) applied to GPE’s financial year ended 31 March 2024. The Board 
considers that it has complied in full with the provisions of the Code during the year. The Code is publicly available 
at www.frc.org.uk. A summary of the system of governance adopted by the Company and how we have applied the 
principles of the Code is set out on pages 91 to 145. The Company is aware of the revised UK Corporate Governance Code 
published in January 2024 (Revised Code), which will begin applying to GPE from 1 April 2025. The Directors are already 
considering the changes introduced in the Revised Code and will report on progress at the appropriate time.
Leadership 
and purpose
Provides an overview of 
the activities undertaken 
by the Board in the year,  
how the Board has 
considered its s.172 
responsibilities and its 
governance framework.
	
– A review of the year from the Chair
	
– The Board’s attendance and activities during the year
	
– Setting the Company’s standards
	
– Purpose, values and culture
	
– Stakeholder engagement and how the Board has 
considered its s.172 and stakeholder responsibilities
	
– Our conflicts of interest procedures
	
– Board induction and development
See more about our approach to leadership  
and purpose on pages 91 to 107
Division of 
responsibilities
Explains the roles of the 
Board and its Directors.
	
– The role and interaction of the Board 
and its Committees during the year
	
– The roles of the individual Directors
See more about our approach to division 
of responsibilities on pages 108 and 109
Composition, 
succession 
and evaluation
Sets out the key processes 
which ensure that the 
Board and its Committees 
can operate effectively.
	
– Composition and diversity
	
– Nomination Committee report
	
– This year’s Board evaluation
See more about our approach to effectiveness  
on pages 110 to 115
Audit, risks and 
internal controls
Explains the role of 
the Board and the Audit 
Committee in ensuring 
the integrity of the 
financial statements and 
maintaining effective  
systems of internal controls.
	
– Internal controls and ongoing risk management
	
– Fair, balanced and understandable
	
– Audit Committee report
See more about our approach to accountability  
on pages 116 to 123
Remuneration
Describes the Company’s 
remuneration arrangements 
in respect of its Directors 
and how these have been 
implemented in 2023/24.
	
– Statement by the Remuneration Committee Chair
	
– Annual report on remuneration
See more about our approach to remuneration  
on pages 124 to 143
90
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Introduction from the Chair 
Dear fellow shareholder
I am delighted to present this year’s Corporate Governance 
report for the financial year ended 31 March 2024.
The Board recognises that how the Group does business is as 
important as what it does. A strong governance framework 
with robust supporting processes across the Group, with high 
standards set from the top, is a key factor in our ability to 
deliver sustainable business performance, generate value 
for our shareholders and contribute to wider society.
A key part of the Board’s role is to provide entrepreneurial 
leadership, with appropriate oversight, challenge and support 
to management. At GPE, the Board’s support, advice and 
interaction extend beyond the boardroom, supporting 
our efforts to promote and monitor culture and ensure its 
alignment with our purpose, values and strategy.
Board focus and oversight
Key areas of the Board’s focus during the year have included 
our response to macro conditions and the volatile global and 
political landscape, evolving and executing our strategy, 
driving our Flex ambitions alongside the development 
pipeline, developing our organisational structure to deliver 
our ambitions plans, further embedding our Customer First 
approach, wider stakeholder engagement and progressing 
our sustainability and diversity and inclusion agendas. 
Further details can be found in ‘What we did in 2023/24’ 
on pages 106 to 107.
UK Corporate Governance Code  
and s.172 reporting
This report demonstrates how we have applied the principles 
and complied with the provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018 (the Code) during the year and our 
approach to governance in practice. Our Code compliance 
statement can be found on page 90. Details of how the 
Board has discharged its duty under s.172 of the Companies 
Act 2006 can be found on pages 72, 104 and 106 and 107.
The Board and its Committees have spent time considering 
corporate governance reforms and their implications for 
the Company. This has included reviewing the Revised Code, 
the majority of the provisions of which will apply to the 
Company from the financial year commencing 1 April 2025.
Board composition
Succession planning is an important part of our governance 
processes. As planned, Alison Rose stepped down from the 
Board from the  conclusion of the 2023 AGM to focus on her 
other commitments. Having already identified a need to 
strengthen the Board’s City, financial markets and transaction 
experience, we were pleased to welcome Karen Green to 
the Board from 1 December 2023. 
With both Nick Hampton’s and my own nine-year tenure 
due to be completed in October 2025 and December 2025 
respectively, succession planning for the Senior Independent 
Director and Chair roles is a continuing area of focus for the 
Board and Nomination Committee.
Further details regarding the Board changes in the year, and 
our Board appointment and succession planning processes, 
can be found in the Nomination Committee report on page 112.
Diversity and inclusion
The Board continues to focus on strengthening diversity 
and inclusion at GPE, both in relation to the Board and 
more broadly throughout the organisation. A diverse Board 
and workforce, which is representative of London and 
our customers, is a strategic imperative as we enhance our 
customer approach and develop our operations to meet the 
evolving needs of a diverse customer base. We believe that 
a more diverse and inclusive culture will help GPE to become 
a more profitable, successful and innovative organisation.
We have seen good progress in a number of areas under our 
People Plan, supported by the incorporation of diversity and 
inclusion metrics within the annual bonus objectives of our 
Executive Committee members and other senior executives.  
These include targets to drive progress against our aspirational 
diversity targets for the organisation which were introduced 
last year. These targets have now been supplemented by 
a new target introduced in the year in line with the Parker 
Review. By the end of 2027, we are aiming for at least 15% of 
the senior management population (comprising the Executive 
Committee and their direct reports) to be represented by 
individuals who self-identify as being from an ethnic minority.
However, there is more work to do, and we continue to 
monitor performance against our targets, and the impact and 
development of wider initiatives to drive meaningful progress 
to foster a diverse and inclusive culture. See ‘Our people and 
culture’ on pages 63 to 68 and our Nomination Committee 
report on pages 112 and 113 for further details, including for 
our disclosure against Listing Rule requirements.
Our Board Diversity Policy setting out our diversity targets 
at Board level can be found at www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
governance, reflecting the latest recommendations from 
the FTSE Women Leaders Review and the Parker Review. 
Diversity continues to be a key consideration in Board 
recruitment and succession planning.
Board effectiveness review
This year, we undertook an internal Board evaluation which 
was led by Nick Hampton, our Senior Independent Director. 
Details of this process, the findings of the review and our 
progress against the actions arising from the 2022/23 
Board evaluation can be found on pages 114 and 115.
“A strong governance framework with 
robust supporting processes across the 
Group, with high standards set from 
the top, is a key factor in our ability to 
deliver sustainable business performance, 
generate value for our shareholders and 
contribute to wider society.”
Richard Mully Chair
Governance
91
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Purpose, strategy and consideration of the likely 
consequences of decisions for the long term
In the context of uncertain markets and evolving customer 
needs, the Board has spent significant time this year 
considering the development and execution of our strategy, 
in particular our Flex plans and Customer First approach, 
to ensure we maximise opportunities to generate long-term 
value for our stakeholders in line with our purpose – to unlock 
potential, creating sustainable space for London to thrive. 
As part of these discussions, we challenge our purpose and 
strategic ‘givens’ and reflect on our customers’ changing 
needs, the optimum size for our business, whether our risk 
profile is appropriate and on our investment and disposal 
strategies in the context of the property cycle. The Group’s 
business model and strategy are outlined on pages 12 to 15.
We remain confident that London’s commercial property 
market has enduring appeal and we have been pleased 
to see strong customer demand across our prime office 
and retail portfolio, signing £22.5 million of leases in the 
year. This included completing the leasing at The Hickman, 
E1, signing 29 Flex leases and substantial progress across 
our retail portfolio, with significant lettings at Mount Royal, 
508/540 Oxford Street, W1, Walmar House, 288/300 Regent 
Street, W1, and Kingsland House, 124 Regent Street, W1. 
We continue to evolve with the needs of our customers 
to create market-leading, high quality and sustainable 
workspaces in London. As the market continues to bifurcate, 
with demand focusing on the best spaces which remain 
in limited supply, our activities remain focused on our two 
complementary, overlapping activities of HQ repositioning 
and the delivery of flexible office spaces, providing quality, 
choice and flexibility for our customers.
The Board has progressed our development programme 
this year, including commitments to the redevelopments of 
French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1 and of Minerva 
House, SE1. At the same time, we have continued to grow our 
committed Flex space to more than 500,000 sq ft, and we 
are seeking to grow this to over one million sq ft through a 
combination of organic growth and acquisitions. To this end, 
since approving the acquisition of 141 Wardour Street, W1 in 
May 2023, the Board was pleased to approve the acquisitions of 
the Soho Square Estate, W1 in August 2023 and The Courtyard, 
WC1 in March 2024, the latter being part of a swap deal for 
our asset at 95/96 New Bond Street following progression 
of our business plan for that asset. The Board also approved 
Flex refurbishment schemes for Egyptian & Dudley House, 
Alfred Place and 141 Wardour Street.
With the return of the property cycle, the Board remains focused 
on the acquisition pipeline and ensuring GPE is well positioned to 
take advantage of market conditions and accretive acquisition 
opportunities. We have identified a compelling set of acquisition 
and development opportunities, and the rights issue to be 
announced alongside our year end results will provide us 
with further capacity for new investment to deliver returns 
for our shareholders.
Our customers are at the heart of everything we do, and 
the Board has therefore devoted time to overseeing the 
continued implementation of our Customer First approach. 
Reflecting how our customer-centric approach is becoming 
entrenched in our culture, we were pleased to adopt a new 
GPE Value in the year which was selected by our colleagues – 
‘We value every customer’.
Sustainability is integral to our offer and sits at the core of 
our purpose. The Board sees sustainability as a differentiator 
and an opportunity for GPE, including the acquisition of 
perceived stranded assets where GPE’s skills and credentials 
could potentially allow us to address sustainability demands 
and requirements that existing owners cannot.
It is essential that GPE has the right organisational structure and 
people capabilities in place to deliver our ambitious strategic 
plans. With this objective in mind, the Board and Nomination 
Committee endorsed organisational design changes along 
with several senior management hires and promotions in the 
year, as explained on page 112. 
The Board recognises the importance of innovation and 
technology in enhancing our operations and our customer 
offer and discusses the related risks and opportunities, including 
those posed by artificial intelligence and other developments. 
The Board was pleased to approve a new Digital, Technology & 
Innovation Strategy in April 2024 which was presented by GPE’s 
Director of Digital & Technology, who was recruited into this 
newly created role during the year. The new strategy will apply 
for the next three years and includes goals and objectives for 
GPE to become a more digitally enabled business and deliver 
an improved digital customer experience. 
Stakeholder engagement and support
Building and nurturing strong working relationships with our 
stakeholders is critical to our success and the development 
of our strategy and is intrinsic in our day-to-day activities. 
As well as direct engagement, a key part of the Board’s role is, 
therefore, the oversight of work undertaken by the GPE team 
to maintain and enhance these relationships.
The past year has continued to be impacted by the volatile 
economic and political landscape. The wellbeing of our 
employees has remained paramount and we have continued 
to engage extensively with our colleagues to understand 
what matters most to them. The work of our Employee Impact 
Groups has also continued to strengthen our engagement 
with our colleagues from under-represented groups. We were 
pleased to see positive employee engagement scores this year, 
as set out on page 65, and the Board continues to consider 
colleague feedback and to oversee initiatives designed to 
further strengthen our inclusive culture.
Our Customer First programme continues to be a real 
differentiator, delivering high quality, personal customer 
experiences every day, and we are delighted that this was 
reflected in our Net Promoter Score of +30.2%. We continue 
to focus on customer and supplier engagement as we 
further embed our Customer First approach and progress 
our sustainability ambitions.
Further details of how we engage with our stakeholders 
are set out on pages 50, 63 to 72 and 99 to 104.
Sustainability and the impact of the 
Company’s operations on the community 
and the environment
We see sustainability and responding to climate change as 
an economic and strategic imperative as well as a moral 
obligation. Sustainability and our wider ESG considerations 
are therefore integrated across all our business activities.
Introduction from the Chair continued
92
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

During the year, the Board has received regular reports and 
updates from our Sustainability and Social Impact Director 
and has held detailed discussions regarding our sustainability 
objectives, strategy, risks and opportunities. The Board has 
continued to monitor the progress against our Roadmap to Net 
Zero, the impact of our Internal Carbon Price (now increased 
to £150 per tonne) and the deployment of monies from our 
Decarbonisation Fund to finance the reduction of emissions 
from our buildings. These and other initiatives continue to 
drive meaningful behavioural change across the business.
However, we recognise that sustainability regulations 
and expectations are fast evolving. In May 2024, the Board 
therefore approved our updated Roadmap to Net Zero v.2.0 
to align with the Science Based Targets initiative Corporate 
Net-Zero Standard. The updated Roadmap sets out our new 
near-term and longer-term targets to reduce our Scope 1, 2 
and 3 carbon emissions by 90% by 2040 in order to reach net 
zero by 2040. Working collaboratively with our stakeholders 
is key to achieving our sustainability ambitions and we 
have therefore introduced new customer and supply chain 
engagement targets as part of our Roadmap. Further details 
can be found on page 39.
ESG metrics continue to feature as an important element 
of our annual bonus targets, and we were pleased to see 
strong performance against these targets during the year, 
as further explained in the Directors’ remuneration report 
on page 130.
We have continued to oversee the delivery of our Social 
Impact Strategy, which is designed to create a lasting 
positive social impact in our communities, with a target 
of creating £10 million of social value by 2030. We are 
delighted that, for 2023/24, GPE generated £1.5 million 
in social value through our community programmes and 
direct business activities. See pages 50 and 51 for further 
details regarding the social value we created in the year.
As we seek to build a sustainable legacy for London, we also 
extended our charity partnerships with XLP, a charity focused 
on creating positive futures for young people growing up 
on inner city estates in London, National Energy Action, a 
charity which focuses on alleviating fuel poverty, and Young 
Westminster Foundation, which supports members of local 
youth clubs and organisations through grants, training, 
and networking opportunities. See pages 50 and 51 for 
further details.
Maintaining a reputation for high standards 
of business conduct
We aspire to the highest standards of conduct and, together 
with a culture of continuous improvement in standards and 
performance, this helps to ensure that good governance 
extends beyond the boardroom. In April 2024, the Board 
approved the creation of a new Board Disclosure Committee 
as part of its continuous process review with the aim of 
maximising effectiveness. The new Committee will support 
the Board in the identification, assessment and disclosure of 
market sensitive information and oversight of key procedures.
Annually, the Board approves the Group’s Financial Crime, 
Ethics, Gifts and Hospitality and Whistleblowing Policies, 
each of which are also reviewed in advance by the Audit 
Committee. Each of these policies is available on our 
website at www.gpe.co.uk/about-us/governance
In September each year, the Board considers and approves 
our Modern Slavery Statement, which explains the activities 
we have undertaken during the year to demonstrate our 
commitment to seeking to ensure that there is no slavery, 
forced labour or human trafficking within any part of our 
business or in our supply chains. A copy of our Modern 
Slavery Statement is available at www.gpe.co.uk/our-
modern-slavery-statement. More on how we behave 
can be found on pages 51 and 105.
We seek sustainable long-term, two-way relationships with 
our supply chain, building mutual trust to deliver exceptional 
results in a responsible way. Our Supplier Code of Conduct, 
which is available on our website at www.gpe.co.uk/
our-relationships/our-suppliers, sets out the standards 
we require of our suppliers to help ensure they operate 
ethically and responsibly.
I am delighted that the efforts of our team have been 
rewarded by winning a number of awards, including, 
amongst others, Britain’s Most Admired Company 2023 
(Property/Residential & Commercial REITs), the Best Use of 
Data (Property) award at the UK PropTech Association Awards 
2023, the UK Green Business Circular Economy Project of the 
Year 2023 award for our steel reuse project at 2 Aldermanbury 
Square, the 2023 RIBA National Award for our Hanover Square 
development and the Best Overall Company IR (Small Cap) 
award at the IR Society Best Practice Awards 2023. I am 
also very pleased to report on our achieving gold awards 
in relation to EPRA’s 2023 Best Practice Recommendations 
and Sustainability Best Practices Recommendations.
Engaging with our shareholders
We believe that communication with our shareholders is key. 
To this end, in addition to our comprehensive investor relations 
programme led by Toby Courtauld and Nick Sanderson, 
as detailed on pages 100 and 101, as Chair of GPE, I proactively 
seek periodic engagement with many of our institutional 
shareholders to discuss and hear their views on GPE’s business 
and governance arrangements.
I, together with Nick Hampton as Senior Independent Director, 
am available to meet with shareholders as appropriate. 
Each of our Committee Chairs will also seek engagement 
with shareholders on significant matters related to their 
areas of responsibility. Most recently, Emma Woods, as Chair 
of our Remuneration Committee, met with many of our 
largest shareholders to discuss the changes to our Directors’ 
remuneration policy prior to its approval at the 2023 AGM.
The AGM also provides the Board with an opportunity 
to engage with and answer questions from shareholders. 
Arrangements for the 2024 AGM can be found in our 
2024 AGM Notice.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank all our of 
shareholders and other stakeholders for their continued 
support as we work to evolve and execute GPE’s strategy 
to deliver long-term sustainable success.
Richard Mully
Chair  
22 May 2024
Governance
93
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Richard Mully
BSc (Hons), MBA
Chair
Committees: N
Date appointed to the Board:
December 2016
Date appointed as Chair:
February 2019
Independent: Yes, on 
appointment as Chair
Relevant skills and experience:
Richard is currently Senior 
Advisor to TPG Global LLC. 
He has extensive property, 
banking and private equity 
experience. This, combined 
with his Senior Independent 
and Non-Executive Director 
experience, enables him 
to provide constructive 
leadership, challenge and 
support to the Board and 
wider business for the benefit 
of all stakeholders. Richard 
was formerly Chairman 
of Arlington Business Parks 
Partnership LLP, Vice Chairman 
and member of the Supervisory 
Board of Alstria Office REIT-AG,  
co-founder and Managing 
Partner of Soros Real Estate 
Partners LLC, a Non-Executive 
Director and Chairman of the 
Remuneration Committee 
of Standard Life Aberdeen 
plc and Senior Independent 
Director at ISG, Hansteen 
Holdings and St Modwen 
Properties.
Current external 
commitments:
Senior Advisor to TPG Global 
LLC and Chairman of RX 
Propellant Pvt Ltd (an Actis-
controlled private company 
based in India). Also a Director 
of Starr Street Limited, which 
co-invests in and acts as a 
corporate director of several 
TPG-controlled European 
private real estate companies, 
and as an Advisory Board 
Member of Brydell Partners, 
a private UK investment firm. 
Toby Courtauld
MA, MRICS
Chief Executive
Committees: E  S
Joint venture directorships:
Director of the GHS Limited 
Partnership general partner
Date appointed to the Board:
April 2002
Independent: No
Relevant skills and experience:
Toby joined the Group in 
April 2002 as Chief Executive 
and has more than three 
decades of extensive 
experience in real estate. 
He was previously with the 
property company MEPC 
for 11 years, where he gained 
broad experience ranging from 
portfolio management through 
to corporate transactions and 
general management as a 
member of the Group Executive 
Committee. He has previously 
been President and member of 
the British Property Federation 
Board and Policy Committee. 
Toby’s significant knowledge 
of the Company and the sector 
enables him to provide broad 
leadership of the business 
internally and externally, 
through the successful design 
and implementation of the 
Company’s strategy, values 
and business plans and their 
exemplary communication to 
a wide range of stakeholders.
Current external  
commitments:
Director of The New West 
End Company, Non-Executive 
Director of Liv-ex Limited, 
Member of the Council of 
Imperial College, London and 
Chair of its Property Committee.
Nick Sanderson
BA (Hons), ACA
Chief Financial & 
Operating Officer
Committees: E  S  S  I
Joint venture directorships:
Director of the GHS Limited 
Partnership and the Great 
Ropemaker Partnership general 
partners
Date appointed to the Board:
July 2011
Independent: No
Relevant skills and experience:
Nick joined the Group in 
July 2011 as Finance Director, 
was subsequently promoted 
to Finance & Operations 
Director and is now Chief 
Financial & Operating Officer. 
He was formerly Partner, Head 
of Real Estate Corporate 
Finance Advisory at Deloitte, 
following ten years of real 
estate investment banking 
experience in Europe and Asia 
with Nomura, Lehman Brothers 
and UBS Investment Bank. Nick’s 
wide-ranging property-related 
financial experience combined 
with strategic and corporate 
finance skills enables him to 
provide valuable support in 
developing, implementing and 
articulating the Company’s 
strategy, and taking leadership 
over the delivery of a wide 
range of financial and 
operational matters along with 
our Flex, customer experience 
and corporate marketing 
activities.
Current external  
commitments:
Member of the Reporting 
and Accounting Committee 
of EPRA and Trustee of the 
Outward Bound Trust.
Dan Nicholson
MA (Cantab), MA, MRICS
Executive Director
Committees: E  S  H  
Joint venture directorships:
Director of the Great  
Ropemaker Partnership,  
the Great Victoria Partnership 
and the Great Victoria 
Partnership (No. 2) general 
partners
Date appointed to the Board:
September 2021
Independent: No
Relevant skills and experience:
Dan joined the Group in 
September 2021 as an 
Executive Director and now 
has responsibility for the New 
Business, Portfolio Management 
and Development Management 
teams. He has extensive 
knowledge of the real estate 
industry and, prior to joining GPE, 
spent over ten years with Tishman 
Speyer, for the majority of which 
he ran their UK business. Dan 
started his career as a surveyor 
at Lambert Smith Hampton 
before gaining broad property 
investment, development and 
asset management experience 
in a number of organisations, 
including at City & West End 
Property Group, Quintain 
Estates & Development plc 
and real estate private equity 
firm, Three Delta LLP. Dan’s 
significant sector and business 
expertise enables him to 
provide valuable support in 
developing and implementing 
the Company’s strategy.
Current external  
commitments:
Non-Executive Director of 
Bioregional Homes Limited.
Chair
Executive Directors
The Board
R
N
S
S
A
E
H
Committee memberships:
Committee Chair:
A Audit Committee
E
Executive Committee
N Nomination Committee
S
Sustainability Committee
R Remuneration Committee
H Health & Safety Committee
S
Social Impact Committee
I
Inclusion Committee
94
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Non-Executive Directors
business experience gained in 
multiple industries and diverse 
functional areas, underpinned 
by a strong technology focus, 
and a background in leading 
successful customer-facing 
and digital transformation 
initiatives. Before joining Trainline, 
Champa held senior positions 
at Amadeus IT Group between 
2015 and 2020 and previously 
held leadership roles at American 
Express, Royal Bank of Scotland 
and Cisco Systems. Champa’s 
significant digital transformation, 
technology, operational and 
broad commercial experience 
enable her to provide valuable 
insight as GPE evolves its strategy, 
products and Customer First 
approach.
Current external commitments:
Managing Director for  
the Hospitality division  
of The Access Group.
Karen Green
BSc (Hons)
Non-Executive Director 
Committees: A  N  R  
Date appointed to the Board:
December 2023
Independent: Yes
Relevant skills and experience:
Karen is currently a Non-Executive 
Director, Senior Independent 
Director and Chair of the 
Sustainability Committee at 
Phoenix Group Holdings plc and a 
Non-Executive Director and Chair 
of the Remuneration Committee 
at Admiral Group plc. She was 
previously a Council Member 
and Chair of the Investment 
Committee at Lloyd’s of London 
until November 2023. Karen was 
formerly Chief Executive of Aspen 
UK between 2011 and 2017, which 
comprised the UK insurance 
and reinsurance companies 
of US-listed Aspen Insurance 
Holdings, and also held a number 
of other senior positions at Aspen 
including Group Head of Strategy 
and Corporate Development. 
Prior to that, Karen held various 
senior corporate finance, M&A 
and private equity roles at GE 
Capital and then MMC Capital 
(now Stone Point Capital), 
having started her career as 
an investment banker at Baring 
Brothers and then Schroders plc. 
Karen’s considerable City, 
financial markets and non-
executive experience enable her 
to provide valuable commercial 
insight and to contribute to the 
development and execution 
of the Group’s strategy.
Current external commitments:
Non-Executive Director of 
Phoenix Group Holdings PLC, 
Admiral Group plc, Miller 
Insurance Services LLP and 
Asta Managing Agency 
Limited. Also a member of 
the Supervisory Board of TMF 
Group Holdings BV, Trustee of 
Wellbeing of Women Limited 
and Adviser to Cytora Limited.
Emma Woods
MA (Hons)
Non-Executive Director
Committees: A  N  R  
Date appointed to the Board:
February 2022
Independent: Yes
Relevant skills and experience:
Emma is currently Chair of 
Ancient + Brave, Non-Executive 
Director and Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee 
of Huel Limited (a nutritional 
food company) and Chair of 
Tortilla Mexican Grill plc. Emma 
was formerly Non-Executive 
Director, Senior Independent 
Director and Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee of 
The Gym Group plc. She was 
previously Chief Executive 
Officer at Wagamama and 
subsequently an Advisory Board 
Member of the Wagamama 
Brand Board. Emma has also 
held senior marketing roles at 
Merlin Entertainments, Pizza 
Express and Unilever. Emma’s 
extensive operational, customer 
service, digital and marketing 
skills, combined with her non-
executive and remuneration 
committee experience, allow 
her to provide valuable strategic 
insight and challenge, including 
to further enhance delivery on 
our customers’ needs, as well 
serving as a strong foundation 
for her effective performance as 
Remuneration Committee Chair.
Current external commitments:
Chair of Tortilla Mexican Grill plc, 
Non-Executive Director of  
Huel Limited and Chair of 
Ancient + Brave.
Vicky Jarman
BEng, ACA
Non-Executive Director
Committees: A  N  R
Date appointed to the Board:
February 2020
Independent: Yes
Relevant skills and experience:
Vicky is currently a Non-Executive 
Director of Melrose Industries plc. 
She is a chartered accountant 
who qualified at KPMG before 
spending over ten years with 
Lazard Ltd working in the 
Investment Banking team and 
then as Chief Operating Officer 
for the London and Middle East 
operations until 2009. Vicky has 
previously been a Non-Executive 
Director and Chair of the Audit 
Committees of Equiniti Group plc, 
Hays plc and De La Rue plc, a Non-
Executive Director of Signature 
Aviation plc and Entain plc and 
Senior Independent Director 
at Equiniti Group plc. Vicky’s 
significant financial, commercial 
and non-executive experience 
enable her to contribute to the 
strategy of the business and its 
long-term sustainable success, 
and provide a strong basis for 
her effective performance as 
Audit Committee Chair.
Current external commitments:
Non-Executive Director 
of Melrose Industries plc.
Champa Magesh
MBA, MSIM
Non-Executive Director
Committees: A  N  R
Date appointed to the Board:
August 2022
Independent: Yes
Relevant skills and experience:
Champa is currently Managing 
Director for the Hospitality 
division of The Access Group, a 
private equity-owned business 
management software provider. 
Champa was formerly a member 
of the executive team at Trainline 
plc and President of Trainline 
Partner Solutions, where she 
was responsible for Trainline’s 
business travel and white 
label businesses. Champa has 
over 20 years’ international 
Nick Hampton
MA (Hons)
Senior Independent Director
Committees: A  N  R
Date appointed to the Board:
October 2016 (Senior Independent 
Director from 30 March 2023)
Independent: Yes
Relevant skills and experience:
Nick is currently Chief Executive 
Officer (previously Chief Financial 
Officer) of Tate & Lyle PLC, and 
prior to this spent 20 years with 
PepsiCo in a number of financial, 
commercial and operational 
roles. Nick’s strong financial 
background, and general 
management experience, as well 
as his deep knowledge of GPE, 
provide a strong basis for him 
to offer wise counsel in his role 
as Senior Independent Director.
Current external commitments:
Chief Executive Officer 
of Tate & Lyle PLC.
Mark Anderson
Dip Mgmt, MBA, FRICS
Non-Executive Director
Committees: A  N  R  
Date appointed to the Board:
September 2021
Independent: Yes
Relevant skills and experience:
Mark is currently Property and 
International Managing Director 
of Whitbread Plc and leads its 
international businesses and 
M&A activities. Mark previously 
spent 16 years at J Sainsbury PLC 
in a variety of senior positions, 
finally managing all aspects 
of its property estate. Mark’s 
significant property, operational 
and customer service knowledge 
and expertise, gained over many 
years, enable him to provide 
valuable strategic insight 
and challenge to Board and 
Committee discussions.
Current external commitments:
Property and International 
Managing Director of Whitbread 
Plc and Trustee of Tourism for 
All UK. 
Changes to the Board during 2023/24
	
– Alison Rose stepped down from the Board on 6 July 2023.
	
– Karen Green joined the Board on 1 December 2023.
Governance
95
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Audit  
Committee
See Committee  
report on pages  
116 to 123
Nomination  
Committee
See Committee  
report on pages  
110 to 115
Leadership and purpose
The Board’s attendance in 2023/24
Attendance at scheduled Board and Committee meetings during the year was as follows:
1.	 There were five scheduled Board meetings in 2023/24. The Board 
meeting that would typically be held at the end of March was 
held on 4 April 2024 and therefore technically falls into 2024/25. 
All Directors attended that meeting. The Board also held a 
strategy review session on 5 April 2024 and additional meetings 
in the year to consider matters of a time-sensitive nature – 
see Board activities on pages 97 and 106 and 107.
2.	 Non-Executive Directors (including the Chair), where not a 
member of a Committee, have a standing invitation to attend 
meetings of that Committee where appropriate.
3.	 Executive Directors are not members of the Audit, Nomination 
or Remuneration Committees. However, they are invited to  
attend for parts or all of certain Committee meetings 
where appropriate.
4.	 Karen Green was appointed to the Board and also the Audit, 
Nomination and Remuneration Committees with effect from 
1 December 2023. The numbers in parentheses are the number 
of meetings she could have attended in the year.
5.	 Alison Rose stepped down from the Board at the conclusion 
of the 2023 AGM held on 6 July 2023. The numbers in parentheses 
are the number of meetings she could have attended in the year.  
Alison Rose was unable to attend the Remuneration Committee 
meeting held on 18 April 2023 due to a late scheduling conflict 
with a material business commitment. Alison received meeting 
papers in advance and was able to provide comments to the 
Committee Chair.
5
Scheduled meetings
5
Scheduled meetings
4
Scheduled meetings
5
Scheduled meetings1
Chair2
Richard Mully
–
–
Executive Directors2
Toby Courtauld
–
–
–
Nick Sanderson
–
–
–
Dan Nicholson
–
–
–
Non-Executive 
Directors3
Mark Anderson
Karen Green4
Nick Hampton
Vicky Jarman
Champa Magesh
Alison Rose5
Emma Woods
  Board meetings attended	
  Board meetings not attended
  Committee meetings attended	
  Committee meetings not attended
Board
Remuneration  
Committee
See Committee  
report on pages  
124 to 143
 (1/1)
 (1/1)
 (2/2)
 (1/1)
 (2/2)
 (1/1)
 (1/1)
 (1/2)
96
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Board activities
The Board typically meets for scheduled Board meetings six times a year in addition to an annual strategy review session. 
The Board also meets as necessary to consider matters of a time-sensitive nature.
The role and interaction of the Board and its Committees during the year
The Board has a duty to promote the long-term sustainable success of the Company for its shareholders. The Board is  
responsible for establishing and monitoring the Company’s purpose, values and strategy and ensuring that these and its culture  
are aligned. Its role includes the oversight of human resource levels and succession planning, approval of major acquisitions, 
disposals, capital expenditure and financing arrangements and of the Group’s systems of internal control, governance and 
risk management. The Board provides and promotes effective and entrepreneurial leadership across the business within 
the Group’s governance framework.
May
July
September November
January
April1
Purpose, strategy and implementation
Purpose and strategic review, discussion and setting of business plan
Chief Executive’s report including market conditions dashboard, operational 
parameters, strategic risks and opportunities, leasing activity, sustainability, 
IT & innovation and team resourcing
–
Executive Director’s and other Board reports on valuation, key portfolio 
and development activities, asset strategies, the longer-term pipeline, 
new business opportunities and health and safety updates
–
Chief Financial & Operating Officer’s report including forecasts, finance 
initiatives, debt and equity markets updates, social impact updates and 
operational matters including Flex, customer experience, marketing and HR
–
Shareholder analysis and/or investor relations updates
–
Board property tour
–
–
–
–
–
Risks
Formal review of risk management and internal controls
–
–
–
–
Ongoing monitoring of risks
Governance
Review of half-year or annual results, going concern,  
viability statement, dividend policy and analyst presentation
–
–
–
–
Stakeholder feedback, including shareholders and analysts,  
employees, customers, communities, suppliers, joint venture partners  
and local planning authorities
Reports from Board Committees
–
Corporate governance matters including authority levels,  
Terms of Reference, UK Corporate Governance Code compliance
–
–
–
–
–
Health and safety updates
–
Sustainability updates including vision, strategy, targets and Roadmap
Corporate Responsibility including review of the Company’s 
Modern Slavery Statement, Financial Crime, Ethics, Gifts and Hospitality 
and Whistleblowing Policies
–
–
–
–
Evaluation
Board evaluation
–
–
–
–
–
Conflicts of interest
  Board meeting matter
1.	 The Board meeting that would typically be held at the end of March was held shortly after the year end, on 4 April 2024.
Other ad hoc matters for consideration by the Board at both 
scheduled and unscheduled Board meetings, in addition to 
the above, include:
	
– major potential acquisitions and disposals;
	
– significant leasing arrangements;
	
– approval of major developments;
	
– significant financing arrangements;
	
– Board and senior management appointments; and
	
– appointments of principal advisers.
A forward agenda for the Board is maintained to ensure that 
all necessary and appropriate matters are covered during the 
year and to allow sufficient time for discussion and debate.
The Board receives papers and presentations from the Executive 
Directors and senior managers are regularly invited to attend 
to provide further insight and feedback on specific matters.
Significant matters discussed and major transactions approved 
by the Board in the year are shown on pages 106 and 107.
Where Directors are unable to attend meetings, their comments, 
as appropriate, are provided to the Board or Committee 
Chair prior to the meeting.
At least annually, the Board reviews the nature and scale 
of matters reserved for its decision.
Governance
97
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Our purpose, strategy, values and culture 
Our purpose is to unlock potential, creating sustainable space 
for London to thrive. In setting our purpose, we believe our role 
relates not only to our buildings, but also to the people who live 
and work there and what and how we contribute to the wider 
public realm, community and environment.
The Board sets our strategy and strategic priorities to align 
with our purpose, which informs our decisions regarding our 
acquisition, repositioning, operation or sale of properties.
Our purpose is underpinned by our values and behaviours, which 
encapsulate who we are and how we do business. Our purpose, 
values and behaviours were originally articulated through a 
Board-sponsored, employee-driven initiative and we again 
enlisted the help of our colleagues to revisit and update our 
values in the year. Engaging all our employees in this way helps 
to ensure we have a unifying purpose and set of values which 
are well understood and regularly discussed. At GPE, everyone 
is accountable for living by our shared set of behaviours, 
which form an important part of our workforce policies 
and remuneration processes.
Our culture is underpinned by a clear alignment of purpose, 
strategy, values and incentives. It is our culture that makes 
us unique. Further details regarding our culture, values 
and behaviours can be found on page 63.
Our culture inspires us to go further for our customers, 
partners, each other and the business. As we innovate and 
adapt in a fast-changing market to deliver our customer, 
sustainability, technology and flexible space ambitions, 
our strong culture has never been more important and 
we must therefore work hard to preserve and enhance it.
A key objective for the Board is to monitor our culture, 
and to address any instances where there is a misalignment 
between our purpose, culture, values and behaviours. 
Our culture is not about rules, but about actions, and the 
Board and senior management seek to lead by example 
in communicating and demonstrating the values and 
behaviours which lie at the heart of our culture.
How the Board monitors culture 
The Board is committed to ensuring that 
the tone of our values is set from the top by 
both the Board and senior management. 
Our smaller size and the high level of 
regular Board interaction with employees 
facilitates the Board’s monitoring of 
culture and the implementation of our 
values, which we do in a number of ways:
	
– inclusion of culture, values and 
behaviour-led questions within 
employee surveys, with Board 
analysis of the results;
	
– regular face-to-face engagement 
with employees as part of our 
Non-Executive Director breakfast 
programme, our programme of 
employee engagement sessions, 
Board and Committee presentations, 
property tours and other meetings 
and engagements throughout the year 
(see ‘Engaging with our employees’ 
on pages 102 and 103 for more details);
	
– demonstration of our values is 
an integral part of our annual 
performance reviews, with outcomes 
being reported via the Remuneration 
Committee. 360-degree feedback 
reviews for senior management 
prompt open feedback on culture 
and values which then feeds into an 
individual’s personal development plan. 
Our personal bonus structure ensures 
a strong link between the values and 
remuneration, with a proportion of 
each employee’s personal bonus based 
on their values and behaviours;
	
– Executive Committee members 
hold regular ‘Listening’ sessions 
with colleagues across the business, 
the feedback from which is discussed 
with the Board;
	
– policies, pay and diversity and inclusion 
activities are reviewed and developed 
to ensure they appropriately capture 
and reflect our values;
	
– reviews of compliance, whistleblowing 
statistics, health and safety incidents 
and internal audit reports to identify 
and address any areas not meeting 
expected standards of conduct 
or behaviour;
	
– feedback from our stakeholder 
engagement programmes, including 
our customer survey results, helps 
the Board to assess how the values 
and behaviours are embedded in 
our interactions with third parties 
and the way we do business; and
	
– review of supplier payment practices.
The Board is satisfied that there remains a 
high level of engagement with our values. 
However, safeguarding our culture and 
further embedding our values remains 
a continuous area of focus. Following  
this year’s feedback, a number of  
actions have been taken to help further 
strengthen our culture and drive the 
right behaviours through our activities. 
These have included:
	
– implementing initiatives within our 
People Plan, an ongoing process, to 
positively impact our culture through a 
focus on diversity, equity and inclusion; 
	
– endorsing the launch of new 
development programmes for 
our managers and senior leaders 
to build on their leadership and 
management capabilities;
	
– following the participation by all 
members of our Executive Committee 
in a nine-month inclusive leadership 
programme, running a similar 
programme for other members 
of senior management together 
with compulsory Inclusion Workshops 
for all colleagues;
	
– the inclusion of diversity and inclusion 
KPIs within the annual bonus measures 
for senior executives;
	
– continuing the work of our 
Race & Ethnicity, Women’s, Health 
& Wellbeing and Parents & Carers’ 
employee-led impact groups, 
overseen by the Inclusion Committee, 
aimed at making our culture even 
more inclusive through engagement, 
initiatives and events;
	
– adopting a new Company value which 
was developed with our colleagues –  
‘We value every customer’ – as we 
continue to build on our customer-
centric culture;
	
– holding a series of compulsory  
all-employee workshops designed 
to embed our Customer First 
approach across all our operations 
and business activities; and
	
– demonstrating support for wellbeing 
and good mental health by sponsoring 
activities throughout the year and 
regularly communicating the resources 
made available to colleagues.
Leadership and purpose continued
98
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Stakeholder engagement
Understanding the views of all our stakeholders and fostering of business relationships
The Board oversees and receives regular updates throughout the year on engagement activities with our key stakeholders. 
The Board develops its understanding of these key stakeholder views in a number of different ways, including the following:
Investors
The Chair engages with major shareholders on matters of governance and strategy, 
and Committee Chairs engage, as appropriate, on their areas of responsibility. Formal  
and informal discussions are held with shareholders in the context of the Company’s AGM. 
Shareholders are invited to attend the AGM in person and those unable to attend in person 
are given the opportunity to ask questions of the Board via e-mail in advance of the meeting. 
We have a comprehensive investor relations programme with regular reporting of feedback 
to the Board. Members of the Board also attend investor events to hear views and questions 
first-hand. Our Executive Directors and Corporate Finance team have regular dialogue 
with our debt providers and report to the Board on their feedback.
Our people
High levels of direct engagement are maintained throughout the year through numerous 
mechanisms, including our formal programmes of Non-Executive Director breakfast 
meetings and ‘An Audience with…’ employee engagement sessions, our Non-Executive 
Director mentoring programme, property tours, employee presentations and other meetings 
and events. The Board also receives regular reports on employee feedback, including from 
employee engagement surveys, ‘Listening Sessions’ hosted by Executive Committee members 
with small groups of employees, and from the work of the Inclusion Committee and our 
various Employee Impact Groups.
Customers 
The Board meets customers where possible as part of its cycle of property tours. 
Board papers include regular updates on our Customer First programme and customer 
engagement activities, including feedback from customer meetings which are periodically 
attended by Executive Directors, updates on discussions with property agents and feedback 
from industry forums and events and marketing campaigns. The Board discusses Net Promoter 
Scores and feedback from independent customer surveys. The Board also receives updates 
on occupier trends and market analysis from internal and external presenters.
Joint venture partners
Frequent engagement with joint venture partners throughout the year is led by our 
Executive Directors, at least one of whom serves on each joint venture board, with regular 
updates and reporting of key matters to the Board.
Communities
Our Social Impact Strategy, which is designed to create a lasting positive social impact 
in our communities, is set by the Board, with implementation overseen by our Social Impact 
Committee which is chaired by the Chief Financial & Operating Officer. The Board receives 
regular updates on activities and initiatives, including the measurement of the social 
value we create.
Local planning  
authorities
Our relationships with key planning authorities are critical to the delivery of new spaces 
in London. Our Executive Director and Development Director regularly report to the Board 
on recent engagement activities, including planning discussions, community considerations 
and any development consultations involving key stakeholders and local residents.
Suppliers
Engagement is led through our Development, Leasing, Customer Experience, Health and 
Safety and Sustainability teams, with information received through regular Board reports 
and presentations. The Board often engages directly with contractors during development 
site visits and may also receive external presentations from suppliers such as property 
agents and valuers. The Audit Committee reviews GPE’s supplier payment practices 
and performance twice-yearly.
Further details of our relationships and engagement with key stakeholders, how stakeholder issues have been monitored 
and considered by the Board through our scheduled Board meetings, and discussion of matters between these meetings, 
are explained in more detail in:
Our stakeholder relationships on pages 69 to 72
Our people and culture on pages 63 to 68
Our approach to risk on pages 74 to 87
Engaging with our investors on pages 100 and 101
Engaging with our employees on pages 102 and 103
Impact of engagement on Board decisions on page 104
What we did in 2023/24 on pages 106 and 107
Governance
99
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

What we did in 2023/24
	
– Roadshow: US  
(New York & Chicago)
	
– Conference: 
Morgan Stanley 
(London)
	
– Equity sales force 
meetings x1
June
May
November
January
	
– Roadshows: London
	
– Conference: Kempen 
(Netherlands)
	
– Equity sales force 
meetings x3
	
– Roadshows: London & 
Netherlands (virtual)
	
– Conferences: 
JP Morgan (London), 
UBS (London)
	
– Equity sales force 
meetings x2
	
– Conference: 
Barclays (London)
	
– Roadshow: Asia  
(Hong Kong and 
Singapore)
July
	
– Annual General 
Meeting
	
– Fireside chat: 
Numis (London)
	
– Equity sales force 
meetings x1
	
– Conferences:  
Bank of America 
(New York), EPRA 
(London), Goldman 
Sachs (London)
September
Institutional shareholders by geography at 31 March 2024
1%1%
45%
28%
United Kingdom
United States
Europe
Asia Pacific
Rest of World
25%
Investor contact by method
90
53
15
158
meetings
Meeting
Conference
Tour
2023
2024
Engaging with our investors
The Board aims to maintain an open relationship with our investors based on a clear investment case and transparent disclosure. 
As a result, we maintain a regular dialogue with shareholders, potential shareholders, debt providers and analysts through a 
comprehensive investor relations programme.
See more about our largest shareholders on page 145
Sustainability indices 2023/24
Given the increased focus on sustainability, the Board 
believes that it is essential to provide transparent reporting. 
We therefore participated in a number of sustainability 
indices during the year:
	
– CDP
	
– EPRA
	
– MSCI
	
– FTSE4Good
	
– ISS
	
– GRESB
See more about our approach to sustainability on pages 37 to 62
200+
 Investors met during the year
Leadership and purpose continued
	
– Conference: Peel Hunt 
(London)
	
– EPRA/Bloomberg  
Real Estate Summit 
(London)
April
	
– Investor & Analyst 
Flex Session
	
– Property tours
February
March
	
– Conferences:  
Citi (US), Bank of 
America (London)
	
– Property tours
	
– Equity sales force 
meetings x1
100
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Investor & Analyst Flex Session
Since 2017, we have been expanding our provision of 
flexible office spaces across our portfolio. As our Flex 
offers have grown, we have also increased the amount 
of information we provide to investors and analysts to 
help deepen market understanding of our activities.
In February 2024, we hosted an online Investor & 
Analyst Flex session to highlight the opportunity that 
Flex presents when leasing smaller offices in London, 
including an overview of our activities, how we differ 
from our competitors and the returns we expect over 
the coming years. We also took the opportunity to 
provide an update on progress at our exciting larger 
refurbishments including 6 St Andrew Street, EC4 
and 141 Wardour Street, W1. There were more than 
100 attendees at the session.
Our approach
Our Investor Relations programme is executed across 
a number of geographies, reflecting the international 
nature of our share register, and through a variety 
of routes including roadshows, meetings at industry 
conferences, investor and analyst events, property 
tours and presentations to analysts and investment 
banks’ equity sales teams.
The Board is also committed to providing investors 
with regular announcements of significant events 
affecting the Group, including its business activity 
and financial performance. These announcements 
are available on the Group’s website at www.gpe.co.uk 
along with results webcasts, analyst presentations, 
property videos, press releases and interviews with 
the management team.
The Executive Directors and the Director of Financial 
Reporting and Investor Relations are the Company’s 
principal representatives with investors, analysts, 
fund managers, press and other interested parties, 
and independent feedback on presentations by the 
Executive Directors to shareholders and analysts is 
provided to the Board on a regular basis.
The Executive Directors and Corporate Finance team 
also have regular dialogue with our debt providers, 
including relationship banks, private placement 
investors and debenture holders and report back 
to the Board as appropriate.
Activities during the year
Our engagement with our shareholders during the year 
was extensive. In addition to roadshows and attendance 
at conferences, we hosted an Investor and Analyst Flex 
session online to provide a deeper dive on our Flex activities 
and held a series of property tours to showcase a number 
of our recent property acquisitions.
The Executive Directors and senior management had 158 
virtual and in-person meetings with over 200 shareholders, 
and potential shareholders, from a broad range of institutions 
during the year. This included participating in 12 industry 
conferences, which provided the management team with 
the ability to meet a large number of investors on a formal 
and informal basis. We also held five roadshows to meet 
with investors from London, the Netherlands (virtual) and the US 
and a trip to Asia to meet investors in Hong Kong and Singapore. 
We actively seek feedback after every roadshow, which is 
provided to the Board on a regular basis.
Examples of topics raised in the year
	
– Our view on the markets in which we operate;
	
– London economic activity and its impact on office demand, 
retail footfall and occupancy;
	
– Higher interest rates and their impact on future returns 
from the development pipeline;
	
– Our expectation of when the interest rate cycle will turn 
and the implications for forward-look property values;
	
– The expansion of our Flex offers, our ambition for 
growth and their respective financial returns;
	
– The increasingly challenging planning regime in London 
and the impact on the supply of new space;
	
– The increasing bifurcation between the best space and 
the rest, including the importance of sustainability; and
	
– Evolving working patterns including the impact of 
working from home, technology and design.
We used these topics to shape both the content of 
subsequent investor presentations and our communications 
to the market to ensure that we meet their expectations.
Next steps
Following the announcement of our year-end results, 
we will be embarking on our post-results IR programme 
over the early summer. We will be conducting in-person 
roadshows in London, the Netherlands and the US and 
attending the Morgan Stanley and BNP conferences  
in London.
“We had a busy year from an IR perspective. 
Our priorities included showcasing a 
number of our recent property acquisitions 
and providing more granular information on 
our Flex office activities, which culminated 
in an online Flex event in February 2024.”
Stephen Burrows Director of Investor Relations  
and Joint Director of Finance
6 St Andrew Street
Governance
101
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

An audience 
with Champa 
Magesh
One of our ‘Audience with…’ 
sessions this year was held 
with Champa Magesh, 
hosted by Rebecca Bradley, 
our Director of Customer 
Experience & Relationships. 
Rebecca opened the session by 
exploring the evolution of Champa’s 
career and her extensive international 
business experience. Champa discussed 
the importance of having a growth 
mindset and seeking out opportunities 
for development, which resonated 
with colleagues.
This led to an engaging discussion 
on resilience, and how GPE and its 
employees can navigate change by 
amplifying its passion and strengths, 
embracing opportunity and focusing 
on the positive outcomes for customers. 
Champa also highlighted the need 
to stay true to GPE’s strong culture 
and values during periods of change 
and transformation.
Champa answered questions and 
provided her insights on customer 
service, maintaining positive 
relationships, the need for continuous 
feedback and improvement and 
how GPE can further drive progress 
in this area, also learning from 
other industries. This was a helpful 
discussion as we strengthen our 
approach to customer engagement.
Champa spoke about the future of 
technology and artificial intelligence, 
its potential impacts on the workplace 
and how it could be an enabler of 
revenue growth and efficiency for 
GPE and a tool to provide further data 
insight to support decision making.
Champa answered questions 
regarding diversity and inclusion, 
the use of diversity targets, the 
role of GPE’s Employee Impact 
Groups and the responsibility 
of all colleagues to foster and 
maintain an inclusive environment. 
The discussion supported GPE’s 
ongoing focus in this area.
There was an opportunity for 
employees to ask questions and 
exchange views with Champa 
across a broad range of topics 
which affected them.
The session was engaging and 
interactive. It was well attended 
by employees and received 
positive feedback.
Engaging with our employees
Being a relatively small company of approximately 135 
employees operating in one location, there is a high level of 
visibility of the Board by employees and vice versa. Given this 
high level of visibility, the Board has decided not to adopt any 
of the three specific employee engagement methods referred 
to in the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code at this time. 
Instead, we have adopted the following employee engagement 
arrangements, which the Board believes have operated 
effectively during the year, to provide it with regular formal 
and informal employee feedback for consideration as part 
of the Board’s decision-making process:
	
– a formal programme of breakfast meetings between the  
Non-Executive Directors and members of the Executive 
Committee and senior management. These meetings have 
no fixed agenda and provide a useful forum to discuss what 
is happening in day-to-day operations and the associated 
challenges which might not be significant enough individually 
to warrant formal reporting at Board meetings; and
	
– a Non-Executive Director, on a rotational basis, presenting to 
all employees in a discursive format approximately twice yearly 
on a particular theme, followed by a Q&A session. To facilitate 
these sessions, we have set up an online portal for employees 
to raise questions, anonymously if they wish, in advance of the 
event. Employees are also invited to ask questions and to share 
their views on the day. These sessions are also designed for 
Board members to provide the Board’s views, as appropriate, 
on matters raised through employee engagement, and 
feedback from the sessions is reported to the Board. Our latest 
sessions were led by Champa Magesh in November 2023 and 
by Karen Green in April 2024, each of which is described below.
In addition to these arrangements, direct Board engagement 
with employees during the year has included the following:
	
– in September, property tours of 141 Wardour Street and the 
Soho Square Estate as part of the annual Board property tour 
involving our New Business, Development, Project Management, 
Leasing and Flex and Customer Experience teams;
Leadership and purpose continued
“The session was an excellent 
opportunity to hear 
Champa’s views on the 
evolving digital landscape 
and the transformative 
impact that AI might have 
in general and for GPE. She 
also shared helpful insight on 
her career progression and 
how to become a successful 
female executive.”
Kay Fraser  
Deputy Company Secretary
102
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

An audience 
with Karen 
Green
Our latest ‘Audience with…’  
session was held with  
Karen Green, hosted by 
Andrew White, our  
Development Director. 
Andrew introduced Karen, GPE’s newest 
NED, and explored with Karen her career 
path and motivations. Karen discussed 
personal development, self-belief 
and suggestions for how everyone 
can develop their confidence and 
raise their profile.
Karen responded to questions about 
her role as a Non-Executive Director 
and what attracted her to GPE, 
and shared her impressions of GPE as 
a leader in its industry and on matters 
of sustainability. This led to a discussion 
regarding the risks and opportunities 
presented by sustainability challenges, 
and the importance of GPE’s Social 
Impact Strategy.
Karen discussed her experience 
of customer service in the insurance 
industry and the need to prioritise 
areas that will deliver most value 
for GPE’s customers.
Karen spoke about the importance 
of a strong culture, and how it was 
hoped that GPE’s organisational 
redesign would help empower 
colleagues to learn and to develop. 
Employees were interested to 
hear Karen’s views on employee 
engagement and colleagues 
considered additional feedback 
mechanisms which will now be 
considered for the coming year.
There was an engaging conversation 
on diversity and inclusion, the need 
to accelerate progress both at 
GPE and across the wider industry 
and the value of mentoring in 
developing a diverse talent pipeline. 
Additional mentoring opportunities 
for diverse talent are now being 
planned. Karen also shared her own 
experience as a woman in business 
and her work as a Trustee of the 
Wellbeing of Women charity.
Karen also answered questions 
covering a variety of subjects, 
including hybrid working, the role 
and potential impacts of artificial 
intelligence for the real estate 
industry and areas in which the 
insurance and real estate sectors 
might collaborate.
The event was well-received 
with good levels of attendance.
	
– presentations made to the Board by the Executive 
Committee team at scheduled Board meetings;
	
– Board presentations and Q&A sessions by Heads 
of Department and other employees on key matters 
including acquisitions, development appraisals, leasing, 
our Flex business, customer experience, IT and cyber 
security, health and safety, sustainability, financing, 
leasing, investor relations, diversity and inclusion 
and corporate governance;
	
– mentoring sessions between Non-Executive Directors 
and members of senior management as part of our  
Non-Executive Director Mentoring Programme; 
	
– all-staff quarterly review meetings led by our Chief Executive 
which provide an informal forum for employees to discuss 
and raise questions regarding key events at GPE; and
	
– all employees are invited to attend a weekly update 
meeting on Monday mornings, led by our Chief 
Executive and other Executive Directors, to discuss key 
developments and concerns.
During the year, we also adopted a number of initiatives 
and activities to maintain levels of employee engagement, 
wellbeing and feedback, which we continue to evolve to 
further support our people.
See more on pages 63 to 68
“It was great to hear 
directly from Karen at our 
latest ‘Audience with…’ 
She offered a really fresh 
perspective on why GPE 
appeals to her, and her 
extensive journey to date. 
It was a very authentic 
conversation about 
her career but also the 
importance of embedding 
a positive culture in 
the workplace.” 
Yasemin Kiani  
Communications Lead
Governance
103
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Board consideration of stakeholder interests and s.172(1) matters
Impact on decisions
Some examples of how the Board has considered stakeholder interests and s.172(1) matters in its decision making in 2023/24 
are set out below and in ‘What we did in 2023/24’ on pages 106 and 107. Further details on our stakeholder engagement, 
and our response, can also be found on pages 69 to 72.
French Railways House &  
50 Jermyn Street, SW1 (FRH) 
1
4
5
6
In September 2023, the Board approved the 
redevelopment of FRH having secured an 
to option sign a development agreement 
and regear the headlease with freeholder, 
The Crown Estate.
The Board discussed the strong business case for the 
redevelopment and its wider stakeholder impacts 
compared to alternative business 
strategies, including a sale or 
refurbishment. This included 
the review of performance 
metrics, procurement 
and construction costs 
in a volatile market, 
the leasing prospects 
for the scheme and the 
prospective returns for 
GPE and its shareholders.
The Board considered 
customer and agent feedback 
and market analysis, which had 
highlighted strong customer demand for prime office 
space in a location where there was a tightening of 
supply and a limited development pipeline.
The Board had regard to the positive impact the 
scheme would have on local communities and the 
engagement to date with key stakeholders in designing 
the scheme. The impact on the Group’s employees was 
also considered, noting that the scheme would offer 
employees development, project management and 
innovation opportunities.
The Board considered GPE’s sustainability agenda 
and stakeholder expectations and the exemplary and 
market-leading sustainability credentials of the building 
which would include a steel frame comprised of reused 
steel from the careful deconstruction of the previous 
building at 2 Aldermanbury Square, EC2. The Board also 
considered GPE’s ongoing work with suppliers to reduce 
carbon impacts.
Having weighed up the balance of risks and potential 
returns, it was concluded that the proposals aligned 
with GPE’s purpose and strategy and, in view of the 
value expected to be delivered to stakeholders, that 
GPE should proceed with the redevelopment of FRH.
See more on pages 23 and 24
Acquisition of 16/19 Soho Square, 
29/43 Oxford Street and 
7 Falconberg Mews, W1  
(the Soho Square Estate)  
1
2
4
6
In August 2023, the Board approved the 
acquisition of the corporate vehicle holding 
the freehold interests of the Soho Square Estate 
for cash consideration based on a property 
value of £70 million.
The Board noted how the acquisition of the mixed-use 
buildings presented the opportunity to build on GPE’s HQ 
development footprint in a core target Soho location, 
close to the Elizabeth line, along with flagship retail 
fronting Oxford Street. Office and retail market analysis 
for the area was reviewed which indicated the likelihood 
of strong customer demand for prime 
assets in an undersupplied market.
The Board considered the 
mitigation of transaction risks 
and the financial impact of 
the acquisition, including 
the attractive pricing and 
anticipated returns for 
GPE and its shareholders. 
While the site benefited 
from an existing planning 
consent for a new development 
scheme, opportunities also existed 
to enhance the scheme’s design and 
massing to further improve prospective returns  
for shareholders and respond to customer demand.
The Board noted plans to upgrade the buildings to improve 
their sustainability, biodiversity and wellbeing credentials 
in accordance with GPE’s net zero carbon commitments 
and stakeholder expectations. Opportunities to support 
local community needs were also noted. 
From an employee perspective, the acquisition would 
drive further momentum in the business and provide 
employees with additional development opportunities.
Having regard to stakeholder interests, and the  
long-term sustainable value expected to be delivered 
for stakeholders, the Board approved the acquisition 
of the Soho Square Estate. 
See more on pages 11, 24 and 25
Leadership and purpose continued
1  Denotes strategic priorities for 2023/24 as set out on pages 14 and 15.
104
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

How we behave, human rights, supplier 
stewardship and anti-corruption and 
anti-bribery matters
We aspire to the highest standards of conduct based on 
honesty and transparency in everything we do. Our Executive 
Committee has a high level of oversight over the Group’s day-
to-day policies and procedures and carries out regular reviews 
of the appointment of contractors, consultants and suppliers.
We support the principles of the UN Declaration of Human Rights 
and core conventions of the International Labour Organization. 
Our expectations on human rights are set out across a number 
of our policies and procedures as we seek to avoid causing 
or contributing to adverse human rights impacts through our 
activities. In our business relationships, we look to demonstrate 
a commitment to fundamental human rights through our 
own behaviours and look to engage suppliers whose values 
and business principles are consistent with our own. Whilst we 
require all our suppliers to comply with standards and codes that 
may be specific to their industry, our Supplier Code of Conduct 
also sets out the additional standards that we require of our 
suppliers in this regard. GPE team members regularly meet 
with main contractors to share information on industry best 
practice, including in relation to human rights, modern slavery, 
health and safety and responsible sourcing.
In September 2023, we published our latest Modern Slavery 
Act Statement, which can be found at www.gpe.co.uk/our-
modern-slavery-statement, setting out the steps we have 
taken over the past year, and intend to take over the next 
12 months, to ensure our suppliers and their supply chains 
adopt similar standards to our own to prevent slavery and 
human trafficking taking place within our supply chain. 
Formal policies in place in relation to human rights,  
anti-bribery and corruption, fraud and sanctions matters 
include our overarching Financial Crime Policy, together with 
our Ethics, Gifts and Hospitality, Whistleblowing, Use of GPE 
Suppliers, Conflicts of Interest and our Inside Information and 
Share Dealing Policies. All new employees receive training 
on these policies as part of their induction process. A formal 
compliance statement relating to these policies is required 
to be signed off by employees annually, with any matters 
of concern reported to the Audit Committee. There were no 
significant matters to report to the Audit Committee in relation 
to these policies in the year ended 31 March 2024. The Audit 
Committee also reviews our Financial Crime, Ethics, Gifts and 
Hospitality and Whistleblowing Policies annually. Our policies 
can be found at www.gpe.co.uk/about-us/governance
Whilst we consider our industry to be relatively low risk 
with regard to money laundering, we also have a formal 
Anti-Money Laundering Policy in place and specific 
training is provided to employees as appropriate.
Our conflict of interest procedures
The Company’s Articles of Association allow the Board to 
authorise potential conflicts of interest that may arise and to 
impose such limits or conditions as it thinks fit. The Company 
has established a procedure whereby any actual or potential 
conflicts of interest that may arise must be authorised by the 
Board, maintained on a register and periodically reviewed, 
with Directors required to update the Board with any 
changes to the nature of any conflicts disclosed.
A Director who has a conflict of interest is not counted in 
the quorum or entitled to vote when the Board considers 
the matter in which the Director has an interest and 
the Director may be excluded from the meeting where 
appropriate. The Board considers these procedures to 
be working effectively.
Our approach to Board induction 
and development
Having joined the Board as a new Non-Executive Director 
this year, Karen Green received a comprehensive induction 
programme over a number of months which was facilitated 
by the Chair and the General Counsel & Company Secretary 
and tailored to Karen’s individual needs. Our induction 
process is designed to develop the Director’s knowledge and 
understanding of the Group, covering key areas including 
GPE’s purpose, values, culture and strategy, its corporate 
governance, risks and internal controls and the industry and 
markets in which it operates. Our induction programme 
for new Directors is delivered through:
	
– meetings with the Chair, wider Board, General Counsel 
& Company Secretary and relevant Committee Chairs;
	
– a structured programme of meetings with executives 
and senior managers to provide a deeper understanding 
of risks and opportunities and stakeholder interests;
	
– meetings with advisers, including the internal and 
external auditors and brokers, to provide a valuable 
external perspective;
	
– property tours to see assets first-hand and to learn 
more about GPE’s asset and development plans;
	
– access to a library of reference materials covering 
key areas including strategy, finance and operations, 
governance, risk management and internal controls; and
	
– training as appropriate on key policies, statutory duties 
and legal and governance requirements.
To enable the Board to discharge its duties, all Directors 
receive appropriate and timely information, including briefing 
papers distributed in advance of Board meetings and regular 
property tours conducted by the relevant GPE teams.
The Board strongly supports the ongoing development of 
its Directors. The Directors may, at the Company’s expense, 
take independent professional advice and are encouraged 
to continually update their professional skills and knowledge 
of the business and wider industry. Senior managers and 
external advisers presented to the Board during the year on 
a range of subjects, including: macro-economic and political 
risks; industry themes and developments; the global and UK 
real estate investment market; the flexible space market and 
GPE’s flexible space offer; property innovation and technology; 
climate change and sustainability; planning regulation; 
cyber risk; and accounting and governance developments.
Directors also individually attend seminars or conferences 
associated with their expertise or areas of responsibility and 
are provided each quarter with a list of relevant upcoming 
seminars by various firms. Director training is reviewed 
by the Nomination Committee and development areas are 
discussed with individual Directors as part of the annual 
performance evaluation process.
Governance
105
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

May/June
June/July
August/September
Strategy, 
governance, risk 
and opportunity 
management
	
– Discussion of 2023/24 key 
priorities, themes, strategic 
actions and team resourcing
	
– Discussion of market 
conditions, the macro-
economic environment, 
capital allocation implications 
and the strategic risks and 
opportunities 
	
– Update on real estate trends, 
customer demand and rent 
collection
	
– Discussed asset strategies 
and potential sales and 
acquisitions
	
– Received an update on 
activities being undertaken in 
relation to the development 
pipeline, including the Minerva 
House planning process and 
the challenging planning 
environment
	
– Received an update from 
GPE’s corporate brokers 
on the market backdrop 
and GPE’s positioning 
and opportunity
	
– Approval of the refurbishments 
of (i) Egyptian & Dudley 
House, Piccadilly; and (ii) 
Alfred Place, each as Fully 
Managed spaces
	
– Approval of an option 
to regear the headlease 
and sign a development 
agreement with the 
freeholder at FRH
	
– Update on Executive 
Committee ‘Away Day’, 
including discussions on 
market dynamics, team 
effectiveness, delivery of 
a Customer First culture 
and the evolution of GPE’s 
Roadmap to Net Zero 
	
– Approval of the appointment 
of Karen Green as a  
Non-Executive Director
	
– Approval of the acquisition 
of the Soho Square Estate
	
– Strategy update and 
discussion of GPE’s strategic 
response to the economic 
environment and return of 
the property cycle
	
– Update on Flex activities, 
including market conditions, 
performance, customer 
retention and team resourcing
	
– Approval of a new 
£250 million unsecured term 
loan to support the delivery 
of strategic priorities and 
funding of a £175 million 
private placement debt 
maturity
	
– Approval of the definitive 
appraisal and commitment to 
progress the redevelopment 
of FRH
	
– Authority given to progress 
the Minerva House scheme 
design and prepare the 
building for demolition
	
– Noted a health and safety 
update and progress 
against KPIs
Understanding 
the views of 
stakeholders, 
the interests of 
employees and 
the fostering 
of business 
relationships
	
– Received an update on recent 
employee ‘pulse’ engagement 
survey results and feedback 
from Executive Committee 
‘Listening Sessions’
	
– Discussion of customer 
experience initiatives, strong 
NPS results and development 
of actions plans in response to 
feedback, including meetings 
with detractors and process 
improvements
	
– Approved updates to GPE’s 
Sustainability Policy
	
– Consideration of engagement 
with freeholders, including 
to progress the regear of the 
headlease at French Railways 
House & 50 Jermyn Street 
(FRH)
	
– Recommendation of the 
payment of a final dividend 
to shareholders
	
– Noted shareholder feedback 
on the proposed new Directors’ 
remuneration policy and 
changes made in response
	
– Approved proposed new 
Restricted Share Plan to 
support employee motivation 
and retention
	
– Consideration of feedback 
from investor meetings 
following the year-end 
results, including in respect 
of macro challenges, market 
bifurcation, earnings and 
opportunities to strengthen 
GPE’s Flex messaging 
	
– Noted updates on Customer 
First employee workshops and 
a customer panel discussion 
focused on customer 
service strategies 
	
– Noted feedback from joint 
venture partners regarding 
the management of assets 
and JV strategies
	
– Received feedback regarding 
GPE’s successful Community 
Week and funds raised for 
charity partner, XLP
	
– Consideration of reports 
from institutional shareholder 
advisory bodies and the 
recommendations for  
the AGM
	
– Discussion of the sustainability 
landscape and developing 
stakeholder, local authority, 
regulatory and wider 
expectations, including in 
respect of net zero carbon 
and offsetting strategies, 
and the implications for 
GPE’s sustainability strategy 
	
– Noted activities to deepen 
freeholder relationships with 
potential to pursue wider 
acquisition and partnership 
opportunities
	
– Discussion of a review 
to simplify the sesame® 
workplace app and improve 
user experience in response 
to feedback
	
– Noted improvements to 
customer engagement to 
drive actionable insights
	
– Discussion of development, 
planning, procurement and 
construction pricing risks 
and mitigating actions in 
collaboration with suppliers
	
– Review of investor relations 
activities and analyst updates
	
– Approval of GPE’s 2023  
Modern Slavery Statement
What we did in 2023/24
Leadership and purpose continued
2023
Soho Square  
Estate
Consideration of stakeholder engagement
Alfred Place
Soho Square  
Estate
French 
Railways House
106
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

November
January/February
March/April
	
– Discussion of key 
market themes, macro 
conditions and the relative 
performance of the London 
office market
	
– Received an update from 
GPE’s corporate brokers 
regarding macro conditions 
and opportunities as the 
property cycle returns 
	
– Received a review of GPE’s 
technological capabilities 
and discussed opportunities 
to strengthen the enterprise 
architecture and the 
role of data analytics in 
decision-making
	
– Review of potential 
asset sales
	
– Discussion of a 
potential acquisition 
	
– Noted void rates and 
void mitigation strategies
	
– Noted progress against the 
GPE Customer Roadmap 
	
– Supported the 
appointment of PwC 
as GPE’s third-party 
sustainability data 
assurance provider
	
– Review of key themes and 
priorities to be addressed 
as part of the March 2024 
strategy review
	
– Approval of a £200 million 
short term debt facility
	
– Approval of the definitive 
appraisal for the 141 Wardour 
Street refurbishment scheme
	
– Discussion of the London 
Flex office leasing market, 
customer retention and 
the benefits of product 
differentiation and building 
clusters in micro-locations 
	
– Discussion of the 
recommendations arising 
from the internal Board 
evaluation
	
– External presentations on 
the economy and the central 
London office market 
	
– Adoption of a new Digital, 
IT and Innovation Strategy 
	
– Approved a revised Health 
& Safety Policy Statement
	
– Received an update on 
customer experience 
activities 
	
– Approved the acquisition 
of The Courtyard building 
as part of a swap deal with 
95/96 New Bond Street
	
– Approval of the definitive 
appraisal and commitment to 
progress the redevelopment 
of Minerva House
	
– Approval of the definitive 
appraisal for the 
refurbishment of 200 
Gray’s Inn Road
	
– Discussion of feedback 
from joint venture partners
	
– Supported the adoption of a 
new GPE senior management 
ethnic diversity target to 
increase representation 
and further support 
GPE’s inclusive culture
	
– Discussion of design 
progression for near-term 
schemes, including Minerva 
House, to meet evolving 
customer, local community 
and sustainability needs
	
– Approval of the 
interim dividend
	
– Discussion of Customer 
Experience team resourcing 
to meet GPE’s customer 
ambitions and positive 
feedback from new Flex 
customer onboarding 
surveys
	
– Discussion of a planned ‘Flex 
teach-in’ session for investors 
and analysts and feedback 
indicating that Flex was well-
understood and considered 
to be an important part of 
the market going forward
	
– Discussed feedback from 
an investor roadshow in Asia 
suggesting improvements 
in sentiment towards the 
UK real estate market
	
– Received an update, in 
response to evolving market 
expectations, on plans to 
update GPE’s Roadmap to 
Net Zero and sustainability 
targets, including to work 
with customers and suppliers 
to reduce their carbon 
emissions
	
– Noted feedback from 
freeholders in relation to 
proposed headlease regears 
and asset business plans
	
– Review of feedback from an 
institutional investor roadshow 
in November, including positive 
feedback on Flex progress and 
ongoing focus on development 
returns, leverage, growth 
and the scale of acquisition 
opportunities 
	
– Noted GPE’s attainment 
of Level Three Disability 
Confident Employer 
accreditation
	
– Approved GPE’s updated 
Roadmap to Net Zero 
and sustainability targets 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
– Update on results of 
the recent customer 
satisfaction survey and 
Net Promoter Score and 
action plans to respond 
to feedback on processes 
to address maintenance 
and building issues and 
opportunities to strengthen 
strategic relationships, 
customer communications 
and the sesame® app
	
– Approved the adoption 
of a new Company value – 
‘We value every customer’
	
– Discussion of the impacts 
of social impact activities 
and the creation of 
£1.5 million of social value 
in the year
The table below provides examples of our significant discussions, transactions and appointments over and above the 
scheduled matters outlined on page 97, together with examples of our oversight of engagement with stakeholders 
and consideration of s.172(1) matters since April 2023. You can read our s.172(1) statement on page 72.
2024
141 Wardour Street
Minerva House
141 Wardour Street
The Courtyard
Minerva House
Governance
107
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Division of responsibilities
Audit Committee
four scheduled meetings a year
oversees financial reporting
monitors risk management  
and internal controls
scrutinises activities and performance  
of the external auditor
conducts, as appropriate, the tender 
process for the external audit contract
evaluates internal auditor  
and audit plan
Remuneration Committee
five scheduled meetings a year
establishes Directors’ remuneration policy to 
be proposed to shareholders for approval
sets executive remuneration schemes
reviews Executive Committee member 
objectives and achievements
approves senior management  
remuneration and incentive awards
approves variable remuneration targets
approves the Directors’ remuneration report
reviews wider workforce pay policies and 
alignment of incentives with culture
Executive  
Committee
meets fortnightly
implements the  
Group’s strategy
oversees transactions
monitors risks and  
opportunities
responsible for succession 
planning, resourcing and 
people development
Sustainability  
Committee
meets four times a year
manages climate change 
risk and resilience
reviews progress  
and development of  
sustainability strategy
monitors environmental  
compliance
oversees allocation of 
Decarbonisation Fund
development sub-committee 
focuses on innovation and 
opportunities of net zero carbon 
development and refurbishment
portfolio sub-committee focuses 
on reducing carbon emissions 
in the existing portfolio
Social Impact  
Committee
meets four times a year
sets direction for the Group’s 
social value creation
oversees implementation 
of the Group’s Social 
Impact Strategy, charitable 
partnerships and donations
Inclusion Committee
meets six times a year
provides oversight of Group 
diversity and inclusion initiatives
oversees the work of 
Employee Impact Groups
monitors feedback and identifies 
areas for improvement
Health and Safety  
Committee
meets four times a year
reviews the Group’s health 
and safety compliance 
and performance
provides oversight on  
Health and Safety Strategy
identifies and reviews  
opportunities for improvement
Nomination Committee
five scheduled meetings a year
recommends Board appointments
approves senior  
management appointments
oversees succession planning and 
development of a diverse pipeline
responsible for Board  
effectiveness evaluation
typically six scheduled  
meetings a year
sets strategy
provides oversight of  
purpose, culture and risk
approves major transactions
provides oversight of governance
oversees climate change risk 
and sustainability strategy
The role of the Board 
and its Committees 
during the year
Board
Board 
Committees
Management 
Committees
See Nomination Committee report  
on pages 110 to 115
See Our people and culture  
on pages 63 to 68
See Strategic Report  
on pages 01 to 80
See Strategic Report  
on pages 01 to 80
See Sustainability on our 
website www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability/working-safely
See Sustainability on our 
website www.gpe.co.uk/
sustainability
See Directors’ remuneration report  
on pages 124 to 143
See Audit Committee report  
on pages 116 to 123
See Our approach to risk  
on pages 74 to 87
See Board activities on pages 97 to 107
See biographies of the current Directors on pages 94 and 95
See the division of responsibilities of the Directors on pages 108 and 109
108
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

The division of responsibilities of the Directors
The Board currently comprises the Non-Executive Chair, three Executive Directors and six independent Non-Executive 
Directors and is supported by the General Counsel & Company Secretary. The Chair and the other Non-Executive Directors 
meet regularly without the Executive Directors, and at least once a year the Non-Executive Directors meet without the Chair. 
In addition, individual Directors meet routinely outside the formal Board meetings as part of each Director’s contribution 
to the delivery of the Company’s strategy and review of operations.
The Executive Directors meet every two weeks with senior management as the Executive Committee, chaired by the 
Chief Executive, to attend to the ongoing management of the Group. The Executive Committee makes decisions within 
the parameters set out in the Group’s Delegated Authorities which govern the taking and escalation of significant decisions. 
Significant operational and market matters are communicated to the Non-Executive Directors on a timely basis outside 
of the Board meetings. All Directors have access to the advice and services of the General Counsel & Company Secretary, 
who is responsible to the Chair on matters of corporate governance.
Each year the Schedule of Board Responsibilities and Terms of Reference for the roles of Chair, Chief Executive and Senior 
Independent Director are revisited by the whole Board and are available on our website at www.gpe.co.uk/investors/governance
Roles and responsibilities of the Directors:
Chair 
Richard Mully
Richard is responsible for leading the Board and for its effectiveness, meeting 
with shareholders as appropriate, ensuring a culture of openness, transparency 
and debate and helping the Chief Executive ‘to set the tone from the top’ on the 
Company’s purpose, values and culture. As part of his role in leading the Board, 
he ensures that the Board provides constructive input into the development 
of strategy, understands the views of the Company’s key stakeholders and 
provides appropriate oversight, challenge and support.
As Chair, Richard also leads the Nomination Committee.
Chief Executive
Toby Courtauld
Toby is responsible for setting the Group’s strategic direction, implementing the 
agreed strategy, the operational and financial performance of the Group and 
the day-to-day management of the Company, including setting the tone for, and 
ensuring oversight of, the Company’s culture through ‘living our values’ and ensuring 
the Board is aware of key stakeholders’ views. As part of his role, Toby is responsible 
for leading the Executive and Sustainability Committees, has executive responsibility 
for climate change and sustainability matters and has responsibility for oversight 
of the IT, Innovation & Digital Transformation, Leasing and Legal & Corporate 
Secretariat functions.
Chief Financial & 
Operating Officer
Nick Sanderson
Nick supports the Chief Executive in developing and implementing the Group 
strategy and all financial matters. As part of his operations role, Nick has responsibility 
for oversight of the valuation process and the HR, Customer Experience, Flex and 
corporate Marketing functions. Nick also leads the Social Impact Committee.
Executive Director
Dan Nicholson
Dan further supports the Chief Executive in developing and implementing the 
Group strategy while he has specific responsibility for portfolio management and 
development management. Dan also leads the Health and Safety Committee, 
has Board responsibility for health and safety and leads the New Business team. 
Senior  
Independent 
Director
Nick Hampton
Nick acts as a sounding board for the Chair, leads the other independent  
Non-Executive Directors in the performance evaluation of the Chair and is available 
to shareholders as required. As part of his role, he also acts as an intermediary for 
the Non-Executive Directors if necessary and is an independent point of contact 
in the Group’s whistleblowing procedure. As Senior Independent Director, Nick 
is also responsible for the Chair’s succession process, working closely with the 
Nomination Committee.
Non-Executive 
Directors
Mark Anderson
Karen Green
Vicky Jarman
Champa Magesh
Emma Woods
Responsible for bringing an external perspective and providing constructive 
challenge and support to the Board’s deliberations and decision making, using 
their broad mix of business skills, knowledge and experience acquired across 
different business sectors. They are also responsible for monitoring the delivery of 
the agreed strategy within the risk management framework set by the Board and 
promoting high standards of integrity and corporate governance. As Committee 
Chair, Emma Woods is responsible for leading the Remuneration Committee, 
while Vicky Jarman is responsible for leading the Audit Committee. Each Committee 
Chair seeks engagement with shareholders, as appropriate, on significant matters 
relating to their areas of responsibility.
Governance
109
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Composition, succession and evaluation
Directors’ tenure (as at 31 March 2024)
’02
’03
’04
’05
’06
’07
’08
’09
’10
’11
’12
’13
’14
’15
’16
’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
’24
Toby Courtauld
21 yrs 11 mths
Nick Sanderson
12 yrs 8 mths
Dan Nicholson
2 yrs 7 mths
Richard Mully
7 yrs 5 mths
Mark Anderson
2 yrs 7 mths
Karen Green
4 mths
Nick Hampton
7 yrs 7 mths
Vicky Jarman
4 yrs 2 mths
Champa Magesh
1 yr 8 mths
Emma Woods
2 yrs 2 mths
 Executive Directors 
 Non-Executive Directors
Board diversity and tenure (as at 31 March 2024 and the date of this report)
Gender1
Male – 60%
Female – 40%
Age
40–50
51–56
57+
Ethnic group1
White – 90%
Ethnic Minority – 10%
Board balance
Chair
Executive Directors
Independent Non-Executive Directors
1.	 As at 31 March 2024 and the date of this 
report, GPE met the FTSE Women Leaders 
Review target to have at least 40% female 
representation on the Board and the Parker 
Review target to have at least one Director 
from an ethnic minority background. GPE  
does not currently meet the FTSE Women 
Leaders Review target to have at least one 
woman in a senior Board role (Chair, SID, CFO 
or CEO). GPE’s Board Diversity & Inclusion 
Policy, which was updated in March 2023, can 
be found on our website at www.gpe.co.uk/
investors/governance. Further information 
can be found on pages 112 and 113.
8
1
1
4
6
3
1
6
9
Par
ker
 Re
vie
w
Diversity
characteristics 
FTS
E W
om
en 
Le
ad
ers
1
Board composition and diversity
The diagrams below show the Board’s composition, tenure and diversity characteristics.
The biographical details of the Directors can be found on pages 94 and 95 which show the breadth of their skills 
and experience, why their contribution is important to the Company’s long-term sustainable success, and their 
membership of the Company’s various Committees.
Further details regarding diversity and inclusion at GPE can be found on pages 68, 112 and 113.
110
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

In making any recommendations for Board appointments, 
the Nomination Committee consults with the Chief Executive 
and other members of the Board as appropriate. During the 
year, the Chief Executive was invited to attend Nomination 
Committee meetings to provide the Committee with updates 
on human resourcing, diversity and inclusion activities, talent 
development and succession planning. The Chief Executive 
and the Chief Financial & Operating Officer also provided 
their input into Board recruitment processes.
In making recommendations to the Board on Non-Executive 
Director appointments, the Nomination Committee 
specifically considers the expected time commitment of the 
proposed Non-Executive Director and other commitments 
they already have. Agreement of the Board is also required 
before a Director may accept any additional commitments 
to ensure possible conflicts of interest are identified and that 
the Directors will continue to have sufficient time available 
to devote to the Company. In November 2023, the Board 
carefully considered the proposed appointments of Emma 
Woods as a Non-Executive Director of Ancient + Brave and 
of Champa Magesh as Managing Director for the Hospitality 
division of The Access Group, noting their other current 
commitments. The Board was satisfied that these changes 
would not impact Emma’s or Champa’s independence or 
commitment and that in each case they would continue 
to be able to add significant value to their respective 
roles at GPE.
Non-Executive Directors are not appointed for specific terms 
but, in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, 
are subject to annual re-election. All proposed re-elections 
to the Board are formally considered by the Nomination 
Committee, taking account of each individual’s effectiveness 
and commitment to the role.
The Nomination Committee also reviews the recommendations 
of the Board evaluation process and progress against the 
recommendations from the previous year.
Our process
The Nomination Committee Terms of Reference are 
available on the Company website at www.gpe.co.uk/ 
investors/governance
The Nomination Committee membership generally 
includes all of the Non-Executive Directors. At the start of 
the financial year, the Nomination Committee comprised 
the Chair of the Board, Richard Mully, and six independent 
Non-Executive Directors, namely Mark Anderson, Nick 
Hampton, Vicky Jarman, Champa Magesh, Alison Rose and 
Emma Woods. Alison Rose stepped down from the Board, 
and therefore the Committee, with effect 6 July 2023. 
Karen Green was appointed to the Committee with effect 
from her appointment to the Board on 1 December 2023.
Our approach
The key objectives of the Committee are to 
regularly review the skills and experience of the 
Board to ensure that it is the right size, structure 
and composition taking into account the skills, 
experience, independence, knowledge and diversity 
of Directors and the future strategy of the Group.
It is the Committee’s role to consider succession 
planning for the Board and senior executives below 
Board level, to oversee the development of a diverse 
pipeline for succession and to lead on the process 
for Board appointments.
As part of its objectives, the Committee reviews 
and recommends to the Board (i) the compositions 
of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration 
Committees, taking into consideration individuals’ 
experience, ongoing training and development 
needs, their time commitments and the benefits 
of diversity; and (ii) the re-election of Directors by 
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
Nomination  
Committee
1.	 Alison Rose also served as a member of the Nomination Committee during 
the year, stepping down from the Board and the Committee on 6 July 2023.
Committee members1
Director
Role
Richard Mully
Chair
Nick Hampton
Senior Independent Director
Mark Anderson
Non-Executive Director
Karen Green
Non-Executive Director
Vicky Jarman
Non-Executive Director
Champa Magesh
Non-Executive Director
Emma Woods
Non-Executive Director
Further details regarding Committee 
memberships, meetings and attendance 
can be found on page 96.
Governance
111
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Composition, succession and evaluation continued
Dear fellow shareholder
On behalf of the Nomination Committee, welcome to the 
report of the Nomination Committee for the year ended 
31 March 2024. The Committee has continued to focus 
on Board recruitment and succession planning and the 
progression of our diversity and inclusion agenda.
Board and Committee composition
The Nomination Committee regularly reviews the composition 
of the Board and its Committees to ensure they have the 
requisite skills, experience, diversity and knowledge in 
alignment with the Group’s strategy. The Committee also gives 
ongoing consideration to the length of service of, in particular, 
Non-Executive Directors, to ensure Board membership is 
regularly refreshed and that appropriate succession plans 
are in place.
As I explained in last year’s report, having identified the need 
to strengthen the Board’s City, financial and transaction 
experience, the Committee instructed executive search 
firm, Russell Reynolds, to support with the search for an 
additional Non-Executive Director with the desired skills 
and experience. Russell Reynolds has no connection 
with the Company or any individual Directors other than 
to assist with Executive and Non-Executive succession 
planning and appointment processes.
As part of the recruitment process, the Committee reviewed 
diverse longlists from which refined shortlists of candidates 
were selected for interview. Following a detailed selection 
process the Committee recommended to the Board the 
appointment of Karen Green, who joined the Board and each 
of its Committees from 1 December 2023. Karen’s considerable 
City, financial markets and non-executive experience enables 
her to provide valuable commercial insight and to contribute 
to the development and execution of the Group’s strategy.
I am delighted Karen has joined us, together with the other 
additions we have made to the Board over the last few years, 
bringing essential skills and expertise to the Board for the 
future. I would also like to record my thanks to Alison Rose, 
who stepped down from the Board at our AGM on 6 July 2023, 
for her valuable contributions and insight.
The Committee also spent time during the year discussing 
succession planning for Nick Hampton, our Senior Independent 
Director (SID), whose nine-year tenure is due to end in October 
2025, and also for my role as Chair, given I will have served 
nine years on the Board in December 2025. Chair and SID 
succession planning, and the shape and timings of associated 
processes to ensure a smooth transition, will remain an area of 
focus over the next year. We anticipate that Nick Hampton will 
lead the process at the appropriate time to find my successor.
The Committee aims for GPE to achieve the FTSE Women 
Leaders Review and Listing Rule target for at least one of the 
Chair, SID, CEO and CFO positions to be held by a woman, 
and the benefits of diversity will continue to be an important 
consideration in our Board succession planning, including 
our ongoing succession planning for the Chair and SID roles.
Succession planning and talent development
During the year, in addition to the Board processes described 
above, we have considered the development plans and 
succession planning for Executive Directors, the Executive 
Committee and senior leaders. As part of this process, the 
Committee considers the depth and quality of the succession 
pipeline, the skills and capabilities required for the future 
strategic needs of the business, retention and succession 
planning risks, personal development needs and the 
strengthening of diversity and inclusion.
Recognising and developing our top talent is key to ensuring 
that we have a healthy and diverse pipeline of current and 
potential future leaders, and this remains a key area of focus 
for the Board and Committee. We have progressed our 
Non-Executive Director mentoring programme for selected 
members of the GPE team and continue to oversee our wider 
talent development programme. Further details can be 
found on pages 63 to 68.
To enhance the delivery of our Customer First approach as we 
continue to innovate, digitise our activities and grow our Flex 
workspace offer, we were pleased to endorse organisational 
design changes as well as several senior operational role 
changes in the year. This included: Rebecca Bradley, Director 
of Customer Experience & Relationships, assuming leadership 
of our new Customer Strategy & Insights team; Simon Rowley 
being appointed to the newly created role of Director of Flex 
Workspaces; Jordan McLean joining GPE in the newly created 
role of Director of Digital & Technology; and Helen Hare, 
Director of Projects, assuming responsibility for our Building 
Surveying and Technical Services teams. Details of these and 
other changes made to strengthen the team can be found 
on page 66.
Our approach to diversity and inclusion
We recognise the strategic importance of a diverse Board 
and workforce which is representative of our stakeholders 
and which provides different perspectives to support the 
development and delivery of our strategy.
The Board’s Diversity & Inclusion Policy, adopted in March 
2023, specifically applies to the Board and its Committees 
and supports GPE’s wider approach to diversity. A copy of 
the policy can be found on our website at www.gpe.co.uk/
investors/governance. We believe that the Board should 
comprise Directors with a diverse mix of attributes including 
but not limited to skills, knowledge, experience, gender, 
ethnicity, age and educational, professional and socio-
economic background. Different perspectives and points of 
view improve decision making, and we believe that ultimately 
“The Committee has continued  
to focus on Board recruitment  
and succession planning, and 
the progression of our diversity 
and inclusion agenda.”
Richard Mully Chair of the Nomination Committee
112
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

this will benefit GPE’s stakeholders through better business 
performance. The Board also believes that the tone for 
diversity and inclusion at GPE must be set from the top; 
having a diverse leadership team and an open and inclusive 
culture is aligned to our core values and expected behaviours.
We expect our search consultants to ensure that the 
candidate pool for appointments to the Board is sufficiently 
wide and includes candidates from a variety of backgrounds 
with a wide range of experience and strengths to reflect 
the Board’s diversity aims. This approach to recruitment is 
mirrored across the business.
From a gender perspective, the Committee supports 
the recommendations set out in the FTSE Women Leaders 
Review. As at 31 March 2024, women represented 40% of 
the Board, 25% of the Executive Committee and 37% of 
the population comprising the Executive Committee and 
their direct reports. The Board’s Diversity & Inclusion Policy 
also states our aim for there to be at least one woman in 
a senior Board role (Chair, SID, CEO or CFO) by the end of 
2025 at the latest.
We are pleased to have met the Parker Review target to 
have at least one Director from a minority ethnic background 
and, as explained below, we are working to increase ethnic 
minority representation across the organisation.
Diversity and inclusion, and the development of a diverse 
management pipeline, remain a key priority and the Board, 
along with the Nomination and Remuneration Committees, 
continues to drive and oversee our progress in these areas 
under our People Plan. To inject further pace, for 2023/24, 
Executive Directors and other senior executives were 
given a specific annual bonus scorecard measure linked 
to progress against two of our aspirational diversity and 
inclusion targets:
	
– for 40% of senior leadership roles (Executive Committee, 
Department Director and Heads of Department roles) 
to be held by women by 2025 (31 March 2024: 33.3%); and
	
– for 20% of all management roles to be held by colleagues 
who identify with an ethnic minority category (as identified 
by the ONS) by 2025 (31 March 2024: 15%).
In line with the Parker Review recommendations for 
FTSE 350 companies, the Committee has also set a further 
target for at least 15% of the population comprising 
the Executive Committee and their direct reports to be 
represented by individuals who identify with an ethnic 
minority category (as identified by the ONS) by the end 
of 2027 (31 March 2024: 4.2%).
We continue to make progress in many areas but 
recognise there is much work still to do and the Committee 
continues to oversee the development, implementation 
and progress of diversity and inclusion initiatives under our 
Board-approved People Strategy. The work of our Inclusion 
Committee and four Employee Impact Groups has continued 
to provide a voice for colleagues from under-represented 
groups. This year also saw the launch of compulsory inclusion 
workshops for all colleagues, the completion of an inclusive 
leadership programme by Department Directors and Heads 
of Department and a series of ‘Listening Sessions’ hosted 
by Executive Committee members with colleagues from 
across the business. 
We believe that these, and the many other initiatives 
across the business, are helping to educate colleagues 
and foster a diverse and inclusive culture. We were delighted 
to become a Level 3 Disability Confident Employer in the 
year and to receive a Clear Assured Bronze level diversity 
and inclusion accreditation, reflecting the positive progress 
being made in many areas.
Further details regarding our diversity and inclusion initiatives  
and progress can be found on pages 63 to 68.
Committee and Director effectiveness review
This year, the Committee oversaw an internal Board and 
Committee effectiveness review. The review concluded that 
the Board and its Committees, including the Nomination 
Committee, continue to operate efficiently and effectively. 
Details of the review and its findings can be found on 
pages 114 and 115.
All proposed elections and re-elections to the Board are 
formally considered by the Nomination Committee, taking 
account of each individual’s continued effectiveness and 
commitment to the role. Following this review, I can confirm 
that each of the Non-Executive Directors is considered 
effective in their roles and both independent of the executive 
management and free from any business or other relationship 
which could materially interfere with their exercising 
of independent judgement. The SID also met with the 
Directors to appraise my own performance.
Richard Mully
Chair of the Nomination Committee  
22 May 2024
Statement in accordance with Listing Rule  
9.8.6R(9) on Board Diversity
As at 31 March 2024, GPE met the targets specified in Listing 
Rules 9.8.6R(9)(a) and (c) with the Board comprising 40% women 
and having one Director from a minority ethnic background. 
However, while the key roles of Audit Committee Chair and 
Remuneration Committee Chair are both held by women, the 
Board has not yet met the target under Listing Rule 9.8.6R(9)(b)  
for at least one of the Chair of the Board, Chief Executive, 
SID or CFO positions to be held by a woman.
All Board appointments are based on merit and objective criteria, 
taking account of the benefits of diversity and, as explained on 
page 112, the benefits of diversity are an important consideration 
in our ongoing succession planning for the roles of Nick Hampton 
(SID) and Richard Mully (Chair) who will have served on the Board 
for nine years in October 2025 and December 2025 respectively. 
It is the Board’s aspiration and intention to meet the target 
specified in Listing Rule 9.8.6R(9)(b) as we refresh our Board over 
time and, as set out in our Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy, we 
aim to meet all targets set out in Listing 9.8.6(9) by no later than 
the end of 2025. We will provide further updates on our succession 
planning and recruitment processes at the appropriate time.
Details regarding GPE’s gender and ethnic diversity data, 
including that required by Listing Rule 9.8.6R(10), and our 
approach to collecting data, can be found on page 68.
Governance
113
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Composition, succession and evaluation continued
Our 2023/24 Board evaluation process
In accordance with the recommendations of the Code, we undertake a review of the effectiveness of the Board’s performance 
and that of its Committees and Directors every year, with an external evaluation held at least every three years. 
Our progress against the actions identified through the 2022/23 external review facilitated by Milena Djurdjevic of Calibro 
Consult, an external board evaluation specialist, is set out below:
An internal Board and Committee effectiveness review 
was undertaken in 2023/24 which was led by Nick Hampton, 
our SID, with the support of the General Counsel & Company 
Secretary. The process, which was agreed by the Nomination 
Committee, involved completion of an online questionnaire 
followed by individual meetings with Directors, a detailed 
report of findings and discussion at the January 2024 
Board meeting.
The aim of the review was to assess the effectiveness of 
the Board, its Committees and individual Directors in order 
to identify any actions to improve how Directors fulfil their 
duties and become a more effective Board. The review 
covered the following key themes:
	
– the Board’s role, composition and operation;
	
– the Board’s protocols and behaviours and how 
effectively Directors work together to achieve the 
Board’s objectives;
	
– the performance of the Board and its Committees;
	
– progress against the key actions arising from the 
2022/23 external evaluation; and
	
– focused questions on the Board’s strategic oversight 
in the context of the challenging macro environment, 
stakeholder feedback, transition to a new external 
auditor and diversity and inclusion.
Progress against 2022/23 Board evaluation actions 
Actions
Progress
Enhancing the Board’s 
City, financial markets and 
transaction experience. 
	
– Following a detailed recruitment process, Karen Green was appointed to the Board 
on 1 December 2023 bringing considerable City and financial markets experience.
To allocate additional Board 
time to GPE’s strategy and 
transformation.
	
– Additional time allocated at scheduled Board and Committee meetings to 
discuss strategy and transformation, including transformation in the areas 
of Flex operations, customer experience, technology and people.
To further deepen the Board’s 
knowledge of the developing 
flexible space market and 
continue to ensure that Flex 
has the right structure, 
resourcing and oversight.
	
– Updates on Flex performance and market received at each scheduled Board 
meeting. Flexible space market also considered in the context of GPE’s strategy, 
acquisition pipeline, refurbishment and customer feedback discussions.
	
– Further development of Flex management pack and KPIs to monitor performance, 
with additional reporting on operational improvements.
	
– Simon Rowley appointed to the newly created role of Director of Flex Workspaces 
with team recruitment and reorganisation to support Flex delivery.
To further develop the Board’s 
understanding of technology 
and innovation threats and 
opportunities, GPE’s ambitions 
in these areas and the best 
means of achieving them.
(Ongoing focus area)
	
– Presentations to the Board on progress against prior Innovation Strategy 
and internal and external technology risks and opportunities, including AI. 
	
– Creation of new Director of Digital & Technology role. Adoption of new Digital, 
IT & Innovation Strategy in April 2024. 
	
– Updates received on cyber security controls and recommendations arising 
from a simulated cyber attack exercise.
	
– Updates received on a review of the sesame® app to maximise its benefits 
and further support customer experience.
Board and Nomination 
Committee continued focus 
on talent development and 
Executive Committee and 
Board succession planning 
and diversity.
 (Ongoing focus area)
	
– Board and Executive Committee gender diversity increased.
	
– Nomination Committee oversaw organisational design changes, team 
reorganisations and associated talent development and succession opportunities.
	
– Implementation of meaningful diversity and inclusion initiatives – see pages 63 to 68, 
112 and 113.
	
– Diversity and inclusion targets tracked, new senior management ethnic diversity 
target introduced in line with Parker Review and clear D&I annual bonus targets set.
114
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

2023
2024
The process also considered the effectiveness of individual 
Directors and one-to-one performance feedback was given 
by the SID to the Chair and by the Chair to the other Directors 
at the end of the process. The review concluded that the 
Board, its Committees and individual Directors continue 
to operate effectively.
Some of the key strengths identified included:
	
– an inclusive Board culture which is open, collaborative 
and collegiate;
	
– high levels of engagement from Directors with 
strong contributions to both strategic and 
organisational discussions;
	
– a diverse range of skills and perspectives, supported 
by recent additions to the Board;
	
– constructive discussion with good debate and an 
appropriate balance of challenge and support; 
	
– well-managed Board and Committee meetings supported 
by high quality papers and effective leadership from their 
respective Chairs, with a clear focus on priorities; and
	
– strong progress having been made in response to key 
areas of feedback arising from the prior year’s review, 
in particular in relation to the implementation of 
organisational changes and the development of the 
Flex strategy, business plan and operations. 
The review identified some recommendations and 
opportunities and the key actions arising from the review 
are as follows:
What we did in 2023/24
Nomination Committee
	
– Richard Mully and  
Russell Reynolds updated  
the Committee on the 
search for an additional  
Non-Executive Director  
with City and financial 
markets experience
	
– The Committee discussed 
Executive Committee 
talent planning, succession 
and development
	
– The Committee noted 
Alison Rose’s decision not 
to stand for re-election at 
the AGM and subsequently 
recommended the 
appointment of Karen 
Green as a Non-Executive 
Director and member of 
the Audit, Nomination and 
Remuneration Committees
Board
	
– The Board approved 
the appointment of Karen 
Green as a Non-Executive 
Director
Nomination Committee
	
– The Committee discussed 
the findings from the 2023/24 
external Board and Board 
Committee evaluation
	
– The Committee reviewed 
Board and Board 
Committee compositions 
and Board training
	
– The Committee received 
an update on governance 
and regulatory requirements, 
including the revised UK 
Corporate Governance Code
	
– The Committee reviewed 
its Terms of Reference
Board meeting
	
– The Board and Committee 
memberships were approved
Nomination Committee
	
– The Committee discussed 
Executive Director 
performance and 
development
	
– The Committee endorsed 
proposed senior  
operational role changes 
and appointments
Nomination Committee
	
– The Committee endorsed 
proposed changes to GPE’s 
organisational design 
and structure
	
– The Committee discussed 
the findings from a senior 
management talent 
development, retention and 
succession planning review 
and Executive Committee 
succession planning
	
– The Committee considered 
Chair and SID succession 
planning 
Board
	
– The Board considered the 
findings from the 2023/24 
Board and Board Committee 
evaluation
Nomination Committee
	
– The Committee discussed 
the diversity and inclusion 
agenda and initiatives 
and the development 
of a diverse pipeline 
	
– The Committee approved 
GPE’s new voluntary ethnic 
diversity target for senior 
management in line with 
the Parker Review
	
– The Committee received 
an update on proposed 
organisational design 
changes
Key recommendations from the 
2023/24 Board evaluation
1
To monitor the implementation of 
organisational design and people 
changes to ensure that GPE has the 
right structure and capabilities to 
deliver its ambitious strategic plan.
2
Continuing to oversee the evolution 
of the Flex strategy and product 
offer to drive differentiated returns 
and shareholder value.
3
To maintain close oversight of macro 
conditions and the next property cycle 
and the implications for GPE’s strategy 
and capital allocation decisions.
4
To allocate additional Board 
time to considering technology 
risks and opportunities, including 
implementation of the new Digital, 
IT & Innovation Strategy.
5
Ongoing focus on Board composition 
and succession planning in view of 
Chair and SID tenures and on diversity 
representation levels of the Board 
and wider business.
March
May/June
November
September
January
February
Governance
115
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Audit, risks and internal controls
Together, the Audit Committee and the Board are responsible 
for ensuring the Group has an effective internal control and 
risk management system and that the Annual Report provides 
a fair reflection of the Group’s activities during the year.
Internal controls and ongoing risk management
The Board is responsible for maintaining and monitoring 
the Group’s system of internal control and, at least annually, 
reviewing its effectiveness.
Such a system can only provide reasonable, and not absolute, 
assurance against material misstatement or loss, as it is 
designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure 
to achieve business objectives.
The identification and management of risks and opportunities 
is part of the GPE mindset, underpinned by evolving processes 
and procedures in place for identifying, evaluating and 
managing the principal and emerging risks faced by the 
Group. These processes and procedures have been in place 
for the year under review and up to the date of this report, 
are regularly reviewed by the Board and accord with the 
Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on Risk Management, 
Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting.
Key features of our system of internal control include:
	
– a comprehensive system of financial reporting and 
business planning;
	
– a defined schedule of matters reserved for Board decision, 
which is reviewed by the Board at least annually;
	
– an organisational structure with clearly defined levels 
of authority and division of responsibilities;
	
– formal documentation of procedures;
	
– the close involvement of the Executive Directors and the  
other Executive Committee members in day-to-day 
operations, including regular meetings with senior 
managers to review operational activities and risk 
management systems;
	
– the Executive Committee reporting on control systems 
to the Audit Committee and Board, including to annually 
confirm its view on whether GPE’s internal controls, 
and broader control environment, are appropriate 
and operating effectively;
	
– regular Board review of Group strategy, including forecasts 
of the Group’s future performance and progress on the 
Group’s development projects;
	
– formal sign-off on the Group’s Ethics, Financial Crime 
(incorporating anti-fraud, bribery and corruption, 
facilitation of tax evasion and sanctions), Gifts and 
Hospitality and Whistleblowing Policies by all employees 
annually; and
	
– review by the Audit Committee of internal audit reports 
and reports from the external auditor.
Twice a year, the Audit Committee carries out, on behalf 
of the Board, a review of the Group’s risk management 
framework, its principal and emerging risks, key controls and 
their oversight during the year. The Group’s systems of risk 
management and internal controls involves the identification 
of business and financial market risks including social, 
ethical and sustainability issues which may impact on the 
Group’s objectives, together with the controls and reporting 
procedures designed to minimise those risks.
As part of its review, the Audit Committee formally considers 
the key controls forming the Group’s system of internal control 
and whether these are considered to be operating effectively. 
The Committee considers a report from management, 
the work of internal audit, as described on page 120, and 
feedback from the external auditor. Key control observations, 
exceptions and management actions are reviewed and 
discussed, and identified risk areas are considered for inclusion 
in the internal audit plan where appropriate. Once complete, 
the Audit Committee’s review of the Group’s risks and internal 
controls, and their effectiveness, is considered by the full 
Board. No significant control weaknesses or failures were 
identified as part of this year’s internal controls effectiveness 
review. During the year, the Board and Audit Committee 
have overseen actions to further enhance controls 
and the efficiency of GPE’s internal control framework. 
This has included:
	
– the continued embedding of GPE’s fraud risk 
assessment process;
	
– the reorganisation of the Finance team, strengthening 
information flows and management oversight of control 
areas. Further enhancement of GPE’s controls framework 
is being considered in view of the new provisions under 
the revised UK Corporate Governance Code;
	
– the ongoing strengthening of IT disaster recovery 
controls in response to recommendations arising from 
an internal audit review and the adoption of a new Digital, 
Technology and Innovation Strategy; and
	
– enhancements to sustainability data assurance activities.
The Board and Audit Committee have also continued 
to oversee the implementation and development of the 
Company’s risk management framework and processes 
to ensure these remain fit for purpose.
During the year, the Board and the Audit Committee 
have continued to regularly review and monitor the risks, 
potential impacts and controls associated with the volatile 
macro-economic environment and geopolitical risks arising 
from the war in Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, 
including in respect of rising inflation, interest rates and 
property yields, and supply chain pressures. This has included 
a review of the impacts on GPE’s operations, development 
delivery and costs, valuations, financial forecasts and business 
plans. The Group’s business plans continue to be prepared 
under a variety of market scenarios to reflect a number 
of potential outcomes.
The Board and the Audit Committee have continued their 
focus on climate change and decarbonisation risks and the 
steps being taken by GPE to mitigate these risks and their 
potential impacts on our business and operations. Such steps 
have included the updating of our Roadmap to Net Zero, 
further details of which can be found on page 39.
The Group’s principal risks relating to ‘Climate change and 
decarbonisation’, ‘Adverse macro-economic environment’, 
and ‘London attractiveness’ continue to be identified as 
the risks which the Board believes could have the greatest 
potential impact on the Group’s viability. The Group’s viability 
statement can be found on page 88. 
The Group’s principal risks and the processes in place 
to manage those risks are described in more detail on 
pages 74 to 87.
116
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Audit  
Committee
Our process
The Audit Committee Terms of Reference are available on the 
Company website at www.gpe.co.uk/investors/governance
At the beginning of the financial year, the Committee 
comprised six independent Non-Executive Directors: Vicky 
Jarman as Chair, Mark Anderson, Nick Hampton, Champa 
Magesh, Alison Rose and Emma Woods. Alison Rose stepped 
down from the Board, and therefore the Committee, 
at the end of the Company’s Annual General Meeting on 
6 July 2023. Karen Green joined the Committee with effect 
from her appointment to the Board on 1 December 2023.
The biographies of the current Committee members are set 
out on pages 94 and 95. Vicky Jarman, Nick Hampton and 
Karen Green have recent and relevant financial experience 
and are considered suitably competent in accounting and/
or auditing. The Committee, as a whole, has competence 
relevant to the real estate sector.
The Committee provides a forum for review of the Group’s 
financial external reporting, including its accounting policies. 
In respect of the Group’s half-year and year-end results, 
this includes discussions with the Group’s external valuer, 
CBRE, on the valuation process and conditions in London’s 
real estate markets and with the Group’s external auditor, 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), on any accounting 
or audit matters. The Committee reviews the Company’s 
sustainability data assurance activities being carried out 
by PwC’s sustainability assurance team and considers 
the Company’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures in the Annual Report. The Committee also reviews 
the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s internal 
financial controls and internal control and risk management 
systems and is responsible for the selection and review of 
the effectiveness of the internal and external auditors.
The Chair of the Board, Richard Mully, attends the 
meetings reviewing the half-year and year-end results 
and has a standing invitation to attend any other meetings 
as appropriate. The Chief Executive, Chief Financial & 
Operating Officer, Executive Director, Director of Investor 
Relations and Joint Director of Financial Reporting, other 
members of senior management and representatives 
from the external auditor and internal auditor also attend 
Committee meetings as appropriate.
The Committee typically meets four times a year, with the 
meetings aligned with our financial reporting timetable.
Our approach
The key objectives for the Audit Committee are to 
review and report to the Board and shareholders on 
the Group’s financial reporting, internal control and 
risk management systems, and on the independence 
and effectiveness of the external auditor.
Committee members1
Director
Role
Vicky Jarman
Committee Chair
Nick Hampton
Senior Independent Director
Mark Anderson
Non-Executive Director
Karen Green
Non-Executive Director
Champa Magesh
Non-Executive Director
Emma Woods
Non-Executive Director
Further details regarding Committee 
memberships, meetings and attendance 
can be found on page 96.
1.	 Alison Rose also served as a member of the Audit Committee during the year, 
stepping down from the Board and the Committee on 6 July 2023.
Governance
117
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

In addition, the Committee has continued to monitor UK 
audit and corporate governance reforms and consider the 
implications of the revised UK Corporate Governance Code 
(the Revised Code) which was published in January 2024. 
The majority of the changes will apply to the Company from 
the accounting period commencing 1 April 2025 with certain 
provisions concerning internal controls and risk management 
reporting to apply from the subsequent accounting period. 
The Committee has also had regard to the ‘Audit Committees 
and the External Audit: Minimum Standard (Minimum Standard)’ 
against which it will report under the Revised Code. While the 
Committee considers that it met the requirements of the 
Minimum Standard in 2023/24, it is considering opportunities 
to enhance processes regarding the evidence it obtains from 
stakeholders regarding the effectiveness of the external audit 
in view of the recommendations of the Minimum Standard.
Valuation of the portfolio, accounting 
considerations and key areas of judgement
As expected of a listed property REIT, the most significant 
financial judgement in the preparation of the Group accounts 
is GPE’s property valuation, which is central to the Group’s 
performance and net tangible asset value and is inherently 
subjective. A key responsibility of the Committee is, therefore, 
to satisfy itself that the valuation process in relation to the 
Group’s property portfolio has been carried out appropriately 
by the Group’s valuer, CBRE. Following a comprehensive 
process, which is outlined in more detail below, the Committee 
is satisfied that the valuation process is sufficiently robust.
In October 2023, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors 
published an updated UK supplement of its ‘Red Book’ – 
its master document for regulating the valuation profession 
globally – implementing new rules that will prevent valuation 
firms from valuing an asset for regulated purposes for more 
than ten consecutive years. It is expected that CBRE will 
remain as the Group’s valuer until 31 March 2026 in accordance 
with the applicable rules and the Committee will be overseeing 
the process for the appointment of a new valuer with 
appropriate transitional arrangements.
During the year, the Committee considered a number of items 
that impacted the Group’s financial statements, including: 
	
– the segmental reporting of GPE’s Fully Managed activities 
in accordance with ‘IFRS 8 – Segmental Reporting’ as 
these activities have grown along with associated Flex 
management information produced by the business;
	
– the accounting treatment of the acquisition of King 
Sloane Properties Limited, being the corporate vehicle 
which held the Soho Square Estate, W1;
	
– the accounting treatment of the £200 million interest 
rate cap taken out alongside GPE’s new £250 million term 
loan in September 2023 to protect against further interest 
rate increases; 
	
– the accounting treatment in respect of the New City Court, 
SE1 redevelopment in accordance with ‘IAS 40 – Investment 
Property’; and
	
– the rate of capitalisation of interest for upcoming 
redevelopments under IAS 23 in view of the Group’s 
new debt facilities – ‘Borrowing Costs’.
Dear fellow shareholder
On behalf of the Audit Committee, I am pleased to present 
the report of the Audit Committee for the year ended 
31 March 2024.
During a year which was marked by continued macro-
economic volatility and the impacts of the war in Ukraine 
and conflict in the Middle East, the Committee has played 
a crucial role in providing comfort to the Board on the 
integrity of the Group’s processes and procedures in relation 
to financial reporting, internal control and risk management.
The Committee’s report is intended to provide insight into its 
activities during the year and sets out how it has performed 
against its key objectives.
As outlined on pages 117 and 123, the Committee meets 
four times a year to:
	
– review the plan for the external audit;
	
– agree the internal audit plan;
	
– identify key accounting matters and areas of judgement 
as early as possible;
	
– review reports from the external and internal auditors 
and valuer;
	
– consider how risks and internal controls have operated 
in the preceding six months in respect of the half-year 
and year-end results;
	
– monitor the integrity of the Group’s financial reporting 
and consider any key accounting judgements by 
management; and
	
– review the independence and effectiveness of both 
the external and internal auditors.
This year, the Committee spent time ensuring the 
effective transition to the new external auditor, 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), which succeeded 
Deloitte as the Group’s external auditor from the conclusion 
of the Company’s Annual General Meeting on 6 July 2023. 
Further details can be found on page 121.
The Committee also oversaw a tender process resulting in 
the appointment of PwC as the Group’s sustainability data 
assurance provider in respect of selected data presented in 
this Annual Report, and agreed the scope of the assurance 
work to be performed.
Audit, risks and internal controls continued
“The Committee has continued to  
play a crucial role in providing comfort 
to the Board on the integrity of the 
Group’s processes and procedures in 
relation to financial reporting, internal 
control and risk management.”
Vicky Jarman Chair of the Audit Committee
118
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Accounting and key areas of judgement
Significant matter
Action taken
Valuation of the Group’s portfolio
The valuation of the Group’s property 
portfolio is a key determinant of the 
Group’s net tangible asset value as well 
as indirectly impacting executive and 
employee remuneration. The valuation 
is conducted externally by independent 
valuers; however, the nature of the 
valuation process is inherently subjective 
due to the assumptions made on market 
comparable yields, estimated rental 
values, void periods and the costs to 
complete development projects.
The Audit Committee, together with the Chair of the Board, meets with the valuer, 
the Executive Directors and senior management involved in the valuation process along 
with the external auditor in November and May to discuss the valuation included within 
the half-year and year-end financial statements. This review includes the valuation 
process undertaken, changes in market conditions, including higher interest rates 
and property yields, recent transactions in the market and how these have impacted 
our portfolio, the valuation of individual buildings and the valuer’s expectations in 
relation to future rental growth and yield movement. The Committee asks the valuer 
to highlight significant judgements or disagreements with management during the 
valuation process.
The external auditor, PwC, using its real estate experts, separately meets the valuer 
and provides the Audit Committee with a summary of its work as part of its reports 
on the half-year review and year-end audit.
As a result of these reviews, the Committee concluded that the valuation had been 
carried out appropriately and independently and was suitable for inclusion in the 
Group’s accounts.
Fair, balanced and understandable
As part of the fair, balanced and understandable review, 
an advanced draft of the whole Annual Report was reviewed 
by senior management, with independent functions also 
reviewing and verifying relevant sections. The Chief Financial & 
Operating Officer, in his year-end Audit Committee and Board 
papers, includes a checklist of areas for the Audit Committee 
and Board to consider (including successes and challenges 
over the year and looking ahead) when reviewing the fairness, 
consistency and balance of the Annual Report and Financial 
Statements, including whether there are significant omissions 
of information. The external auditor also reported its findings 
to the Committee.
The Committee considered this Annual Report and Financial 
Statements 2024, taken as a whole, and concluded that the 
disclosures, as well as the process and controls underlying 
its production, were appropriate and recommended to the 
Board that the Annual Report and Financial Statements 
2024 is fair, balanced and understandable while providing 
the necessary information to assess the Company’s position 
and performance, business model and strategy.
Viability and going concern statements
The Committee considered the viability and going concern 
statements and their underlying assumptions. This included 
management’s work on assessing the potential risks to 
the business and the impacts arising from the adverse  
macro-economic environment (including the impact of 
high inflation and higher interest rates on property yields, 
property valuation, the costs and availability of financing, 
and on the supply chain), London attractiveness risks,  
(including the rise of alternative destinations 
for international trade), development risk, and climate 
change and decarbonisation risks. Following this review, 
the Committee was satisfied that management had 
conducted robust viability and going concern assessments 
and recommended the approval of the viability and 
going concern statements to the Board.
Internal controls and risk management
The Audit Committee’s role in supporting the Board’s 
oversight and review of the Group’s principal and emerging risks, 
internal controls and risk management processes is covered 
on pages 74 to 77 and page 116.
The Committee continues to consider and monitor 
developments and practice in the areas of internal controls 
assurance and risk management, including in the context 
of relevant new provisions under the Revised Code which 
will apply to the Company from the accounting period 
commencing 1 April 2026.
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) review
During the year, the Group received a letter from the Corporate 
Reporting Review team of the FRC concerning its review of 
the Group’s interim report for the period ended 30 September 
2023. The FRC did not raise any questions or queries based on 
its review, although the FRC caveated that it could do so in the 
future should new information become available to it which it 
considers relevant. The review conducted by the FRC was based 
solely on the interim report and does not provide any assurance 
that the interim report is correct in all material respects.
Governance
119
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Audit, risks and internal controls continued
Internal audit
Our internal audit function, which is outsourced to Grant 
Thornton, provides independent assurance as to the 
adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal 
controls and risk management systems, and reports its 
findings to the Committee.
During the year, Grant Thornton undertook internal 
audit reviews in relation to: the Flex management 
reporting; Information Technology Disaster Recovery; 
HR Operations; and Sustainability Governance. The reviews 
did not identify any major causes for concern. A number 
of recommendations were made to strengthen the design 
and operation of certain controls and to implement ‘best 
practice’ alongside other opportunities for improvements. 
Following reviews, the Committee receives regular updates 
on the implementation of agreed actions arising from 
internal audit findings. Periodic reports on IT general 
controls and cyber governance are also presented to 
the Board during the year.
At the Audit Committee meeting in February 2024, the 
Committee reviewed and agreed with Grant Thornton 
the internal audit plan for 2024/25, having regard to the 
Company’s risk management framework. It was concluded 
that, for the current financial year, Grant Thornton should 
carry out an internal audit of:
	
– the Customer Relationship Management system, 
post implementation review;
	
– the end-to-end service charges management  
process; and
	
– business applications governance and procurement.
The Committee believes that the process for determining 
the internal audit plan is appropriate and effective with 
scope for the Committee to react to events, new information 
and situations which become known during the year and to 
include them as necessary. The internal audit plan for 2023/24 
will continue to be reviewed and adapted, if appropriate, 
to meet the changing needs of the business.
Supplier payment practices
The Committee reviews the Group’s supplier payment 
practices twice per year along with opportunities to further 
enhance processes. For the period to 31 March 2024, the 
average supplier payment period of the Group’s largest 
subsidiary was 35 days (2023: 31 days).
Our Anti-Fraud, Bribery & Corruption 
and Whistleblowing Policies
Each year, as part of the year-end planning meeting, 
the Committee reviews the Group’s Financial Crime, Ethics, 
Gifts and Hospitality and Whistleblowing Policies, which 
comprise the Company’s key policies on bribery and fraud, 
for reporting to the Board. The Board has a zero tolerance 
for bribery and corruption of any kind. The Committee 
also oversees the periodic review of the Group’s fraud risk 
assessment matrix.
This year, the Committee also considered the implications 
of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 
(ECCTA), including the new ‘failure to prevent fraud’ corporate 
offence which is expected to come into force and apply to the 
Group in 2024, following the awaited publication of associated 
guidance by the government. A review of the Group’s fraud 
procedures will be undertaken against the government’s 
pending guidance to ensure they remain appropriate.
Annually, all employees are required to confirm their compliance  
with the Group’s Financial Crime, Ethics, Gifts and Hospitality 
and Whistleblowing Policies as outlined on page 105, and 
any non-compliance is escalated to the Committee as 
appropriate. No matters were escalated to the Committee 
during the year.
The Company’s whistleblowing processes include a 
confidential hotline, operated by an independent third party, 
through which employees can anonymously raise matters 
of concern relating to suspected wrongdoings or dangers at 
work. Any matters reported are investigated by the General 
Counsel & Company Secretary or the Senior Independent 
Director. During the year, there were no whistleblowing 
incidents reported.
Committee effectiveness
I believe that the quality of discussion and level of challenge 
by the Committee with management, the internal and external 
audit teams and the valuer, together with the timeliness and 
quality of papers received by the Committee, ensures the 
Committee is able to perform its role effectively. The formal 
review of the Committee’s effectiveness was covered as 
part of this year’s internal Board and Committee evaluation 
process and I am pleased that the review confirmed that the 
Committee continues to operate effectively. Further details 
on the evaluation process and its broader findings can be 
found on pages 114 and 115.
Vicky Jarman
Chair of the Audit Committee 
22 May 2024
120
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

The external audit and review  
of its effectiveness
The Audit Committee advises the Board on the appointment 
of the external auditor, negotiates and agrees its remuneration 
for audit and non-audit work, reviews its effectiveness, 
independence and objectivity and discusses the nature, 
scope and results of the audit with the external auditor.
Following a competitive tender process in 2022/23 and 
approval by shareholders at the 2023 AGM, PwC was 
appointed as the Group’s external auditor for 2023/24.
In view of Deloitte stepping down and PwC being newly 
appointed as the Company’s external auditor in July 2023, 
the Committee did not conduct a formal backward-looking 
effectiveness review in respect of the 2022/23 external 
audit. Nevertheless, taking relevant factors into account, 
the Committee was satisfied with the independence and 
effectiveness of the 2022/23 external audit. The next such 
backward-looking evaluation will take place later this 
year after PwC has completed its first audit of the Group’s 
financial statements.
The Committee has closely monitored the performance 
of PwC since its appointment and the effectiveness of 
the external audit process throughout the year. As part 
of this work, the Audit Committee has considered:
	
– the risks to audit quality identified by PwC and how 
these are being addressed, including through the use 
of technology;
	
– PwC’s key audit firm level controls relied on to address 
audit quality risks, reports on PwC’s work from the FRC’s 
Audit Quality Review, PwC’s Audit Quality Plan, Strategy 
and audit culture and behaviours and the findings of 
FRC reviews of Company financial statements;
	
– the calibre of PwC as an external audit firm – including 
reputation, coverage and industry presence;
	
– progress against the agreed audit plan and any changes 
to its scope or perceived audit risks; 
	
– the quality of the audit team and its individuals, their 
character and knowledge, resources, partner involvement, 
team rotation, planning and execution, scope adequacy 
and specialist areas and understanding of the business;
	
– audit fee reasonableness and scope changes;
	
– audit communications and effectiveness – response to 
new developments and regulations, approach to critical 
accounting policies, issues and risks, quality of processes, 
timely resolution of issues, level of professional scepticism 
and challenge of management assumptions and the results 
of those challenges, robustness in handling key judgements, 
quality of responses to questions from the Audit Committee 
and feedback on management performance and internal 
control systems;
	
– feedback from key stakeholders on the conduct of the audit, 
including in private sessions held with (i) management; and 
(ii) internal audit without the auditors present and regular 
meetings between the Audit Committee Chair and members 
of management and the internal audit partner; 
	
– governance and independence – internal governance 
arrangements, lines of communication with the Audit 
Committee, integrity of the audit team, Audit Committee 
confidence in the audit team and transparency;
	
– ethical standards, including potential conflicts of interest; and
	
– non-audit work and the potential impairment of 
independence by non-audit fee income.
The Committee also considered the effectiveness of the Group’s 
management during the external audit process and sought 
feedback from PwC on the conduct and responsiveness of 
members of the Finance team. The Committee is satisfied that 
there has been a good level of interaction and communication 
between the GPE team and PwC.
The Committee believes that there has been a smooth 
transition of the external audit to PwC and that the audit 
process and external auditor have been effective. As explained 
above, a formal annual evaluation of PwC will also take 
place later this year after PwC has completed its first audit. 
The Committee is also satisfied with PwC’s independence, 
with non-audit services previously provided by PwC having 
been transferred to other service providers ahead of PwC’s 
appointment, where considered appropriate.
In line with best practice, the Company intends to put the 
external audit out to tender at least every ten years in 
the future.
The Company has complied during the year ended 
31 March 2024, and up to the date of this report, with the 
provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies 
Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender 
Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014.
Non-audit services
The external auditor, PwC, is responsible for the annual 
statutory audit and also provides certain other services 
which the Audit Committee believes PwC is best placed to 
undertake due to its position as auditor. These arrangements 
are governed by the Group’s policy for provision of non-
audit services by the external auditor, which is available 
on the Company’s website at www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
governance. The policy, which is reviewed annually, reflects 
the FRC’s Revised Ethical Standard that came into force 
on 15 March 2020.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that auditor 
independence and objectivity are maintained and, under 
the policy, prior approval is required by the Committee for 
any permitted non-statutory assignments over £50,000, or 
where such an assignment would take the cumulative total 
of non-audit fees paid to the external auditor over 50% of 
that year’s audit fees. The appointment of PwC to undertake 
any non-audit services also requires the prior approval of 
the Chief Financial & Operating Officer and, importantly, 
he is required to consider whether it is in the interests 
of the Company that the services are provided by PwC, 
rather than another supplier.
Governance
121
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Audit, risks and internal controls continued
The policy also applies a fee cap on permitted non-audit 
services, whereby such fees in any financial year must 
not exceed 70% of the average statutory audit fee for the 
prior three consecutive financial years paid to the appointed 
auditor. The cap on PwC‘s non-audit services will therefore 
apply from the year ending 31 March 2027, after it has 
completed three audits. 
During the year, activities undertaken by PwC for the Group 
outside of the main audit included:
	
– the interim review;
	
– reporting on the income cover in connection with the 
debenture trust deed compliance certificate; and
	
– third-party sustainability assurance.
In each case, PwC was considered the most appropriate 
service provider due to its position as auditor and given its 
detailed knowledge and understanding of our business and 
industry. Ahead of its appointment as the Group’s external 
auditor for the 2023/24 audit, non-audit services previously 
provided to the Group by PwC were transitioned to other 
service providers where considered appropriate.
Payments made by the Group for audit and non-audit fees for 
the year are disclosed on page 157. The Group’s audit fees are 
presented to, discussed and approved by the Audit Committee 
at its February year-end planning meeting. In addition, audit 
and non-audit fees paid to PwC in respect of joint ventures 
totalled £94,000 (GPE share: £46,000) (2023: £52,500) and 
£nil (2023: £52,500) respectively.
Non-audit fees represented 23% of the 2023/24 audit fee 
of £548,000 (including Group share of joint ventures). A more 
detailed analysis is provided on page 157.
PwC’s non-audit service fees for the year ending 31 March 
2025 will be higher than for the year ended 31 March 2024 as 
a consequence of its appointment as reporting accountants 
to the Company in connection with the rights issue to be 
announced alongside our 2023/24 year-end results.
In addition to ensuring compliance with the Group’s policy in 
respect of non-audit services, the Committee also receives 
confirmation from PwC that it remains independent and has 
maintained internal safeguards to ensure its objectivity.
Internal audit and review  
of its effectiveness
An Internal Audit Charter approved by the Committee 
governs the internal audit remit and provides the framework 
for the conduct of the internal audit function, which has 
been outsourced to Grant Thornton since January 2022. 
The Internal Audit Charter reflects market practice and 
recommendations in the Internal Audit Code published 
by the Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors in 2020.
The Committee reviews and approves the internal audit 
plan annually which is closely aligned to the review by 
management and the Committee of the Group’s risk 
management framework. In addition, the Committee 
Chair meets with the internal auditor separately from the 
Committee to discuss planned internal audit activities 
and the results of internal audit reviews.
The Committee meets annually with the internal auditor 
without management present to discuss the effectiveness 
of the internal audit function, and also to seek feedback 
from the internal auditor on the conduct of members of the 
GPE team during the internal audit process. The external 
audit partner also meets separately with the internal 
auditor at least annually.
In January 2024, the Committee conducted a formal 
assessment of the effectiveness of internal audit, which was 
facilitated by the Company Secretariat team. Key stakeholders 
were asked to complete a questionnaire-based assessment 
which was designed to evaluate internal audit’s purpose, 
objectives and understanding, position, process, relationships 
and communication, people and performance. The responses 
were collated on an anonymous basis and the results were 
shared with the Committee Chair, internal audit partner and 
Chief Financial & Operating Officer prior to consideration 
at the Committee’s meeting in February 2024.
The overall assessment concluded that the internal 
audit function remained effective. The review found that 
internal audit was trusted and respected by the business 
and respondents believed that its work led to lasting 
positive change and a stronger risk management culture. 
Internal audit was also considered to have good relationships 
and open communications with stakeholders. Feedback was 
constructive and provided areas of opportunity for Grant 
Thornton to deepen its understanding of the business and 
its risk environment, and to continue to build its standing 
in the business.
Where it is proposed to appoint Grant Thornton in any 
advisory role, careful consideration must first be given to 
any potential conflict with its internal audit role. The Audit 
Committee will also specifically consider Grant Thornton’s 
independence when annually reviewing and approving 
the internal audit plan to ensure that there are no conflicts 
in Grant Thornton undertaking the proposed internal 
audit work.
122
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Internal audit
Met with Grant Thornton to approve the 2024/25 internal 
audit plan, approve updates to the internal audit charter 
and discuss the findings from the internal audit reviews 
of HR Operations and Sustainability Governance.
Year-end planning update
Met with PwC and management to consider/approve:
	
– significant accounting and key areas of judgement;
	
– proposed changes to disclosures planned for the 2024 
Annual Report;
	
– developments in corporate governance presented by PwC;
	
– the 2023/24 audit plan update; and
	
– the 2023/24 audit fee – see page 122.
Other matters
Discussed the internal audit effectiveness review.
Discussed the roles and structure of the GPE Finance team.
Discussed the outcome of the process to appoint a new 
sustainability data assurance provider and the scope of work.
Corporate governance and legal update received from 
the General Counsel & Company Secretary and PwC, 
including in respect of the Revised Code and ECCTA.
Review of GPE’s Financial Crime, Ethics, Gifts and Hospitality 
and Whistleblowing Policies – see page 120.
Reviewed the Audit Committee Terms of Reference.
Reviewed non-audit fees and the Provision of Non-Audit 
Services Policy.
Reviewed the Committee’s effectiveness.
Discussed valuer rotation requirements and likely process 
and supported CBRE remaining as the Group’s valuer in 
the interim period.
Review of half-year results
Met with CBRE to consider the September 2023 valuation. 
Met with PwC and management to consider:
	
– PwC’s independence;
	
– their review of the September 2023 valuation and the 
half-year results announcement;
	
– significant accounting and key areas of judgement, 
including going concern – see page 119;
	
– the principal and emerging risks, monitoring of 
internal controls and risk management processes;
	
– the half-year results announcement; and
	
– the relationship between PwC and management, 
with feedback provided by PwC without management 
present and from management without PwC present.
Other matters
Discussed an update from the General Counsel 
on corporate governance and legal developments, 
including the ECCTA.
Received an update on supplier payment practices.
Considered the findings from Grant Thornton’s internal 
audit review of Information Technology Disaster and 
progress against the FY23 internal audit plan.
What we did in relation to the financial year ended 31 March 2024
Review of year-end results
Met with CBRE to consider the March 2024 valuation – 
see pages 34 to 36.
Met with PwC and management to review:
	
– PwC’s audit of the March 2024 valuation – 
see pages 34 to 36;
	
– significant accounting and key areas of judgement, 
including going concern and viability work – 
see page 119;
	
– an update on Group tax matters;
	
– an update on GPE’s supplier payment practices;
	
– the principal and emerging risks, monitoring of 
internal controls and risk management processes – 
see pages 74 to 87;
	
– the year-end results announcement and Annual Report; 
	
– the relationship between PwC and GPE management, 
with feedback provided by PwC without management 
present.
Other matters
Met with Grant Thornton to receive an update on the 
status of the 2024/25 internal audit plan and actions 
arising from previous internal audits.
September
February
Annual planning meeting
Met with CBRE to receive a market update ahead of the 
half-year valuation.
Met with the external auditor, PwC, and management 
to review:
	
– significant accounting and key areas of judgement – 
see page 119; and
	
– PwC’s 2023/24 audit plan.
Internal audit
Met with the internal auditor, Grant Thornton, to discuss 
its findings from its Flex Management Reporting review.
Other matters
Discussed the scope of sustainability data assurance 
going forward and the process to appoint a third-party 
assurance provider.
Received an update from PwC regarding the latest 
developments in audit and corporate governance reforms.
2023
2024
November
May
Governance
123
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report
Our process
The Committee’s Terms of Reference are available on the 
Company’s website at www.gpe.co.uk/about-us/governance.
The Committee currently comprises six independent  
Non-Executive Directors, namely Emma Woods as Chair, 
Nick Hampton, Mark Anderson, Karen Green, Vicky Jarman 
and Champa Magesh. Karen Green joined the Board and 
the Committee on 1 December 2023, whilst Alison Rose 
stepped down from the Board and the Committee on 
6 July 2023. Non-Executive Directors who are not members of 
the Committee have a standing invitation to attend meetings 
of the Committee as appropriate. While not a member, 
the Company’s Chair generally attends the meetings 
except where his own remuneration is under discussion.
At the request of the Committee, Toby Courtauld, the Chief 
Executive, attends Committee meetings where appropriate 
and provides input with regard to the achievement of 
personal objectives for senior executives. He also attends 
discussions on remuneration as considered appropriate 
by the Committee, including on new appointments and 
promotions and to provide his input on the development 
of the Directors’ remuneration policy. The Chief Financial 
& Operating Officer attends discussions regarding the 
setting of, and performance against, annual bonus targets. 
Carrie Heiss, HR Director, attends Committee meetings 
where appropriate to present proposals regarding Executive 
Director and workforce remuneration and related policies, 
to discuss the alignment of remuneration across the 
organisation and to voice the perspectives of employees 
on relevant matters.
The Committee ensures it seeks independent advice as 
appropriate and was advised during the year by independent 
remuneration consultants, FIT Remuneration Consultants LLP. 
The Committee also has access to the HR Director and General 
Counsel & Company Secretary without the Executives present. 
Consistent with good practice, no Director or employee is 
involved in discussions on their own pay and any decisions 
are taken without the affected individual present.
Our approach
The key objectives of the Remuneration Committee 
(the Committee) are to ensure that the Executive 
Directors are appropriately incentivised and 
remuneration arrangements are fully aligned 
with the Company’s strategy to generate superior 
portfolio and shareholder returns.
As well as being responsible for determining 
the remuneration of the Executive Directors, the 
Committee is responsible for setting the remuneration 
of the Chair of the Board, the members of the Executive 
Committee and other senior executives. The Committee 
also reviews the broad operation of remuneration 
policy and practices for all employees.
The Directors’ remuneration policy (the Policy), 
approved at the 2023 AGM, was updated to reflect 
the current strategy and wider economic backdrop 
with a revised bonus scorecard focusing on the 
Company’s key business priorities to drive its strategy, 
with this scorecard being applied to all colleagues, 
and the previous LTIP being replaced by a restricted 
share plan. It is felt that the updated policy better 
aligns the whole workforce to the Company’s success.
Remuneration  
Committee
Further details regarding Committee 
memberships, meetings and attendance 
can be found on page 96.
Committee members
Director
Role
Emma Woods
Committee Chair
Nick Hampton
Senior Independent Director
Mark Anderson
Non-Executive Director
Karen Green
Non-Executive Director
Vicky Jarman
Non-Executive Director
Champa Magesh
Non-Executive Director
Employee remuneration and engagement
The Committee applies consistent remuneration 
principles for employees across the Group. As part 
of its responsibilities, the Committee reviews GPE’s 
wider employee remuneration policies and practices 
and the alignment of incentives and rewards with 
the Company’s culture.
The Committee is advised of pay levels throughout 
the Group, and takes into account wider pay and 
conditions across the Group when determining the 
remuneration of the Executive Directors and other 
members of senior management. It specifically approves 
the packages of more senior colleagues and is advised 
of benchmark pay levels for most roles. As part of the 
annual pay review, the Committee receives a report 
setting out changes to employee remuneration levels and 
proposed discretionary bonus awards. The Committee 
also discusses GPE’s gender pay gap statistics alongside 
our D&I objectives and related policies.
The Company engages with employees on remuneration 
generally, including executive remuneration. In March 
2023, the Committee Chair led an interactive all-
employee event to discuss the proposed changes to the 
Policy. Employees have since been periodically updated 
in the year on the implementation of the Policy and 
performance against the bonus scorecard measures. 
More broadly, remuneration is regularly discussed with 
employees. GPE’s annual review process and how this 
links to employees’ remuneration is incorporated into our 
new joiner induction process, along with an introduction 
to GPE’s all-employee share plan. Briefing sessions are 
also held with employees from time to time to discuss 
pay policies and the work of the Committee, as well as to 
enable employees to find out more about GPE’s pension 
scheme and all-employee share plan offer. 
124
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Clarity
Remuneration 
arrangements should be 
transparent and promote 
effective engagement 
with shareholders and 
the workforce
The Committee proactively engages with shareholders and their 
representative bodies as part of the Policy renewal process. As such, it 
engaged with shareholders representing over 73% of the share register as 
part of the 2023 Policy review. The Committee is also regularly updated on 
developments in market practice and receives reports on pay and conditions 
across the business. In March 2023, the Chair of the Committee invited all 
staff to attend an interactive event to discuss the planned Policy revisions 
and broader remuneration matters. Employees are periodically updated 
on implementation of the Policy and performance against the bonus 
scorecard measures.
Simplicity
Remuneration structures 
should avoid complexity 
and their rationale and 
operation should be easy 
to understand
The Company operates a simple pay model which comprises fixed and 
variable remuneration, with the performance conditions for variable elements 
clearly communicated to participants. Under the Policy, at least 80% of bonus 
measures must be objectively measurable.
The restricted share plan (RSP) provides a simple mechanism for aligning 
Executive Director and shareholder interests. The RSP removes the difficult 
challenge of setting robust and appropriately challenging longer-term 
performance targets in a volatile market, thereby avoiding potentially 
unintended remuneration outcomes, and significantly reduces the 
maximum pay available to Executive Directors.
Risk
Remuneration 
arrangements should 
ensure reputational and 
other risks from excessive 
rewards, and behavioural 
risks that can arise from 
target-based incentive 
plans, are identified 
and mitigated
There is broad discretion to reduce variable pay if the Committee does 
not consider the formulaic outcome to be appropriate in the circumstances, 
and all plans include the ability to operate malus and clawback, where 
appropriate. A proportion of Executive Director bonuses is deferred into 
shares for three years and post-cessation shareholding guidelines apply 
to mitigate the risk of short-termist behaviours.
Predictability
The range of possible 
reward values to individual 
directors and any other 
limits or discretions should 
be identified and explained 
at the time of approving 
the policy
The Policy includes a scenario chart showing potential pay levels on 
various assumptions, and all awards are subject to maximum grant levels 
as set out in the Policy, together with the discretions set out under ‘Risk’ 
above. The RSP has increased the predictability of reward values subject 
to an overriding discretion to reduce vesting if not considered appropriate 
through its underpin.
Proportionality
The link between individual 
awards, the delivery of 
strategy and the long-term  
performance of the 
Company should be clear. 
Outcomes should not 
reward poor performance
The outturn in respect of variable pay is clearly set out in this report on 
pages 129 to 135, with payment clearly linked to our strategic and financial 
priorities. Pages 17 and 130 set out how the measures under the bonus 
scorecard are clearly linked to the Company’s strategy and KPIs. As indicated 
under ‘Risk’, the outturn can be reduced by the Committee as appropriate 
to ensure that outcomes do not reward poor performance.
Alignment  
to culture
Incentive schemes should 
drive behaviours consistent 
with Company purpose, 
values and strategy
Equivalent incentive plans apply to the wider workforce to engender a  
high-performance culture. The bonus scorecard is cascaded to all colleagues, 
albeit with a higher weighting on personal performance for less senior 
colleagues (and with the colleague engagement and diversity elements 
excluded for most colleagues to avoid potential for conflicts). All objectives 
are linked to the Group’s strategy and KPIs. An individual’s commitment 
to GPE’s values and behaviours is also reviewed as part of the personal 
performance assessment process.
The RSP clearly aligns Executive Directors’ interests with those of shareholders 
by ensuring a focus on delivering the strategy to generate long-term value 
for shareholders.
Compliance with the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code
Throughout the year, the Committee has considered the provisions set out in the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code 
(the Code). In the Committee’s view, it has complied with the provisions of the Code, including those set out in Provision 40  
of the Code as set out below.
Governance
125
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Dear shareholder
I am pleased to present our Directors’ remuneration 
report for the year ended 31 March 2024 (the Report) 
on behalf of the Committee. In particular, I want to thank 
shareholders for the support shown in approving our revised 
2023 Directors’ remuneration policy (the Policy) at our AGM 
held on 6 July 2023, with all of the remuneration-related 
resolutions receiving over 92% support. Whilst we note that 
a minority of shareholders were unable to support the move 
to an RSP, and we will continue to engage with shareholders 
where appropriate over the three-year life of this Policy to 
ensure that they understand its rationale and operation, 
we consider the support achieved as endorsing the  
approach adopted to date.
The Committee has implemented the Policy during the 
year as set out in this Report and no changes to the Policy 
are proposed for 2024/25. A full copy of the Policy can be 
found on our website at www.gpe.co.uk/investors and 
on pages 136 to 146 of last year’s Annual Report.
Key decisions
The Committee has had regard to business performance 
alongside the wider context explained below when considering 
reward and incentive outcomes. Key Committee decisions 
for the year, as more fully described in this Report, include:
	
– determining annual bonus and Long Term Incentive 
Plan (LTIP) outcomes;
	
– agreeing salary and fee increases for the Executive 
Directors and the Chair of the Board below the  
all-colleague average increase; and
	
– setting suitably stretching targets for the 2024/25 
annual bonus.
Remuneration outcomes in respect  
of the year ended 31 March 2024
As anticipated, real estate markets have continued to be 
challenging, with the macro-economic backdrop impacted 
by elevated inflation and interest rates. As a consequence, 
property valuations reduced by 12.1% on a like-for-like 
basis, driven by increased investment yields. This resulted 
in a negative Total Accounting Return (TAR) in absolute 
terms. While a number of real estate companies are yet 
to publish their financial results, we anticipate that our TAR 
for the year underperformed the FTSE 350 Real Estate Index 
due to the comparatively stronger performance of other 
real estate sectors, including student accommodation, 
industrial and logistics space. Shareholder returns were 
also down, with GPE delivering a Total Shareholder 
Return (TSR) of -21.3%.
Despite the challenging macro-economic environment, 
GPE has made significant progress against its strategy during 
the year, increasing our Flex commitments by over 21%, 
committing to our HQ redevelopments at Minerva House, 
SE1 and French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street, SW1 and 
progressing our development pipeline in line with our net zero 
carbon commitments. We have delivered strong operational 
performance, signing £22.5 million of leases in the year with 
total rents 9.1% ahead of ERV (estimated rental values set by 
CBRE at 31 March 2023). We also completed the acquisitions 
of 141 Wardour Street, W1, Bramah House, SE1, the Soho 
Square Estate, W1 and exchanged contracts for the  
acquisition of The Courtyard, WC1.
We have continued to evolve our strategy in response to market 
trends and the changing needs of our customers, people and 
wider stakeholders as we focus on our business priorities to 
position GPE for success for when markets recover. We have 
strengthened our Customer First approach, further developed 
our Flex offerings, developed our updated Roadmap to Net 
Zero and progressed our diversity and inclusion agenda.
Moreover, we have maintained our financial strength and 
capital discipline, with our loan-to-property value ratio 
being 32.6% and our liquidity position remains strong, with 
£633 million of available cash and undrawn facilities. We have 
also maintained the payment of our ordinary dividends.
Taken as a whole, we are well positioned to deliver both 
our purpose and long-term shareholder value and, with 
the market moving in our favour, to take advantage of 
the investment opportunities that are starting to emerge.
Against this backdrop of business performance, the Company’s 
variable pay was assessed as set out in the following sections.
Salaries
As explained in last year’s report, for the year commencing 
1 April 2023, the average like-for-like all-colleague salary 
increase was 5.7%. The Committee continued to focus 
increases on the lowest-paid colleagues and increased 
Toby Courtauld’s, Nick Sanderson’s and Dan Nicholson’s 
salaries by 5%, below the employee average.
Annual Bonus Plan
This was the inaugural year of our new bonus scorecard and 
I am delighted with how it has landed in the organisation. 
Shareholders will recall that we made the move to a more 
target-focused operational scorecard to drive GPE’s 
strategy and performance and to ensure that our talented 
team is motivated to optimise returns for shareholders 
as the economy recovers. Our scorecard is designed to 
focus on the Company’s clear priorities. The changes we 
made followed both external and internal feedback and 
we were mindful of just how important it would be for us 
and our shareholders to retain our talent over the next 
few years. I’m pleased to report that the new scorecard is 
being used as an effective management tool to incentivise 
and challenge our people, with progress being discussed 
regularly at all-company meetings led by our Chief Executive, 
enabling colleagues to really understand the link between 
performance and reward.
“I am particularly pleased that 
our new bonus scorecard has 
been embedded across all levels 
within the business as a key tool 
for continuous assessment of our 
ambition and achievement.”
Emma Woods Chair of the Remuneration Committee
126
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

As outlined above and in the Chief Executive’s report on 
pages 19 and 20, the key scorecard achievements over 
the year were:
	
– our total rent on market lettings in the year beating 
ERV by over 9% whilst maintaining a low vacancy rate 
at 1.3%, despite the challenging macro-economic  
environment;
	
– committing to over 100,000 square feet of new 
Flex space as we expand this area of the business;
	
– achieving an office customer Net Promoter Score of 
+30.2, being (albeit down on last year’s score), ahead 
of the office industry average of +6.9, as we continue 
to strengthen our approach to customer experience;
	
– exceeding our energy consumption reduction targets 
while ensuring that our new developments remain 
on track to being net zero; and
	
– achieving the vast majority of our planning 
milestones in the year, enabling us to progress 
our development pipeline.
The business has worked hard to foster an inclusive and 
diverse culture. Whilst we have seen progress in many areas, 
there is more work do to here and this was reflected in the 
outcomes of our culture and diversity targets for the year.
Full details of the bonus outturn, and the linkage of the 
targets to our strategic priorities, can be found on page 130.
The bonus outcome for 2023/24 is 63.5% achievement 
before the operation of the personal element (which now 
applies to a reduced 10% of the total bonus). This resulted 
in total payouts for the three Executive Directors being 
broadly in line with the prior year at 64.2% for the Chief 
Executive and Chief Financial & Operating Officer and 
63.7% for the Executive Director.
The Committee considered the bonus outturn against 
this wider context and confirmed both that the scorecard 
was operating as intended in aligning variable pay to key 
milestones and that the outturn should be applied without 
the exercise of any discretion. Consistent with the previous 
policy, 40% of the achieved bonuses of the Executive 
Directors will be deferred into shares in the Company 
for three years.
2021 LTIP vesting
While the LTIP has been replaced by the RSP and no further 
grants will be made, outstanding awards will continue to run 
their course. Performance under the 2021 LTIP is expected 
to result in no vesting based on the information available 
as at 31 March 2024 (a nil vesting of the TAR measure having 
already been confirmed).
Overall outturn
The Committee considered the overall outturn for the year, 
with a moderately above target bonus and a zero vest on the 
2021 LTIP, to be in line with both the significant progress against 
the Board’s strategic objectives (justifying the bonus outturn) 
and the shareholder experience (leading to the zero vest of 
the LTIP) resulting in the Committee approving this outturn 
without the exercise of discretion.
Chief Executive outturn vs max and target opportunity £000
Base salary
Benefits
Pension
Annual bonus
LTIP
2,500
0
1,000
500
1,500
2,000
3,000
4,000
3,500
Achieved
Maximum
Target
Toby Courtauld
Decisions relating to the year to March 2025
Salaries
For the year commencing 1 April 2024, the average all-
colleague salary increase has been reduced from 5.7% last 
year to 4.9% (inclusive of an allowance for promotions and 
some benchmarking adjustments). However, we remain 
mindful that cost of living increases will still be impacting our 
lower-paid colleagues the most and so salary increases have 
been focused on our lower-paid colleagues who will generally 
receive a 5% salary increase, with our Executive Directors 
receiving a more modest 2% salary increase.
Annual bonus
The Executive Directors’ bonus opportunity will remain at 
150% of salary, with 40% of any bonus earned deferred into 
shares for three years through the Company’s Deferred Share 
Bonus Plan. The scorecard for 2024/25 will be largely carried 
forward although, reflecting our evolving strategic priorities 
and our experience of now having operated it for a year, 
the following minor changes have been made:
	
– given our increasing focus on income returns, the Flex 
measure will change from a space commitment measure 
(with a 5% weighting) to a net operating income measure 
(with a higher 10% weighting);
	
– as we look to take advantage of market conditions, 
we have introduced a deployment of capital measure 
in place of the previous liquidity measure;
	
– having progressed our planning targets, our development 
measure will focus on achieving key development milestones 
in the year; and
	
– there will be some minor definitional changes to the 
NPS metric to capture retail as well as office customers.
As a result, 60% (previously 50%) of the bonus scorecard 
will comprise financial measures, as set out on page 136.
Restricted Share Plan (RSP)
The second grant under the RSP will be made in or around 
June 2024. Under this grant, the Executive Directors are 
expected to again receive an award each over shares worth 
150% of salary, which will be subject to assessment against 
a performance underpin following the third anniversary of 
grant and then subject to a further two-year holding period.
I hope you find this Report clear and informative and I look 
forward to receiving your support for the resolution approving 
the Report at the 2024 AGM, where I will be available to 
engage with shareholders.
Emma Woods
Chair of the Remuneration Committee  
22 May 2024
Governance
127
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Our overarching remuneration policy principles 
and a fair and consistent approach
The Executive Directors’ total pay is analysed by looking 
at each of the different elements of remuneration, including 
salary, benefits, pension, the Annual Bonus Plan and long-
term incentives, to provide the Committee with a view of 
total remuneration rather than just the competitiveness 
of the individual elements. It is important that the Group’s 
remuneration policy reinforces the Company’s purpose, 
culture and values, providing effective incentives for 
exceptional Group and individual performance. As well as 
providing motivation to perform, remuneration plays an 
important retention role and needs to be appropriately 
competitive without being excessive.
To achieve the aims of the Company’s Policy, the Committee 
generally seeks to position fixed remuneration, including 
benefits and pension, by reference to the mid-market position, 
taking into account the size and complexity of the business 
as compared with other peer companies in the sector, 
and, using a significant proportion of variable reward, 
offers the ability to increase total potential remuneration 
for superior performance through the Annual Bonus Plan 
and long-term incentives.
The Committee seeks to apply consistent principles 
to remuneration across the organisation. Our approach 
to salary reviews is to consider each employee’s level 
of responsibility, experience, individual performance, 
salary levels in comparable companies and the Company’s 
ability to pay. Remuneration surveys and meetings 
with sector specialists are used, where appropriate, 
to establish market rates.
The weighting of the different components of an 
employee’s remuneration will vary depending on their 
role, responsibilities and seniority, with senior employees 
having a higher proportion of their remuneration linked 
to variable reward and Company performance. However, 
we apply our overarching remuneration principles, 
and provide a competitive and consistent remuneration 
and benefits package, as appropriate, throughout GPE. 
This is made up of the following key components:
Salary 
All employees receive a market-competitive base salary reflective of the individual’s role, responsibilities 
and experience, which is subject to an annual external benchmarking review for approximately 95% 
of our roles.
Executive Directors: same approach.
Benefits 
All employees receive market-competitive benefits, including private medical insurance.
Executive Directors: same approach (no car allowance).
Pension 
All employees are eligible and encouraged to join the GPE pension scheme to save for their retirement, 
with an employer contribution of 15%.
Executive Directors: contribution levels are aligned with the wider workforce at 15%.
All-  
employee 
share  
plans
All employees can join the Company’s Share Incentive Plan, allowing employees to purchase Company 
shares in a tax-efficient way and to receive matching shares, thereby encouraging employee share ownership. 
63% of GPE’s employees participate in the Share Incentive Plan.
Executive Directors: also eligible to participate.
Annual  
Bonus  
Plan 
All employees participate in the Annual Bonus Plan. All employees are subject to the same measures with 
the exception of the employee engagement and diversity measures which will not apply to most colleagues 
to avoid conflicts of interest while less senior colleagues have a higher weighting on personal performance.
Executive Directors: have a bonus opportunity of 150% of salary with 40% of any outturn being deferred 
into shares for three years.
Restricted 
Share Plan 
(RSP)
Those able to influence long-term performance, generate significant sustainable returns or managing major 
capital budgets may participate in the RSP. RSP awards (like prior LTIP awards) will vest after three years.
Executive Directors: have a larger potential maximum opportunity under the RSP, being eligible to 
receive an award of up to 150% of base salary. RSP awards are subject to a five-year release period 
(comprising a three-year underpin period followed by a two-year holding period).
128
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

This Report sets out how the Policy was applied in 2023/24 and how it will be applied for the forthcoming year. It is divided into 
four sections:
Section of Report
Page numbers
Executive Directors’ remuneration for the year ended 31 March 2024
See pages 129 to 135
Executive Directors’ remuneration for the year ending 31 March 2025
See pages 136 and 137
Chair and Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration
See page 138
Other disclosures
See pages 139 to 143
The Company’s auditor has reported on specific sections of this Report and stated, where applicable, that in its opinion those 
sections have been properly prepared in accordance with Schedule 8 to the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups 
(Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, as amended. The sections that have been subject to audit are marked with an asterisk (*).
The Policy was approved by shareholders at the 2023 AGM and is available on the Company’s website at www.gpe.co.uk/investors. 
Executive Directors’ remuneration for the year ended 31 March 2024
Executive Directors’ single figure table* 
Base  
salary1
Benefits
Pension2
SIP3
Fixed  
Total
Annual  
Bonus4
LTIP
Variable  
Total
Total8,9
Executive 
Directors
2024 
£000
2023 
£000
2024 
£000
2023 
£000
2024 
£000
2023 
£000
2024 
£000
2023 
£000
2024 
£000
2023 
£000
20245
£000
2023
£000
20246
£000
20237
£000
2024  
£000
2023 
£000
2024 
£000
2023  
£000
Toby 
Courtauld
679
646
18
16
102
121
4
4
803
787
653
630
–
–
653
630
1,456
1,417
Nick 
Sanderson
467
445
19
18
70
83
4
4
560
550
449
439
–
–
449
439
1,009
989
Dan 
Nicholson2
380
362
8
6
57
54
4
4
449
426
363
345
–
–
363
345
812
771
1.	 Please refer to the ‘Salary’ table on page 136 for details of Executive Directors’ annual salaries.
2.	 Toby Courtauld and Nick Sanderson received a pension allowance of 15% of their basic salary in line with the wider workforce. Dan Nicholson has 
received a mix of employer pension contributions and pension allowance of 15% of his basic salary (receiving £10,000 of his total contribution into 
a registered pension).
3.	 The value of the matching shares awarded under the SIP are calculated using the share price on the date the shares were purchased.
4.	 40% of the annual bonus will be deferred into shares for three years under the Deferred Share Bonus Plan. Deferred bonus shares are not subject to any 
further conditions.
5.	 The estimated 2024 annual bonus outcome based on information available as at 19 May 2024, with the relative TAR measure to be confirmed following 
the publication of results by comparator companies.
6.	 A nil vesting of the 2021 LTIP awards has been assumed based on the information available as at 19 May 2024.
7.	 The figures disclosed in the 2023 Annual Report for the 2020 LTIP vesting were based on an estimated nil vesting which was subsequently confirmed. 
There was therefore no value attributed to share price appreciation.
8.	 The single figure for the total remuneration due to the Directors for the year ended 31 March 2024.
9.	 The aggregate emoluments (being salary/fees, benefits, cash allowances in lieu of pension and bonus) of all Directors for the year ended 31 March 2024 
was £3,958,000 (2023: £3,929,000).
Fixed pay:
Taxable benefits*
Benefits principally comprise private medical insurance, membership subscriptions, travel expenses, luncheon vouchers, 
the Employee Assistance Programme and entertainment. No individual benefit provided has a value which is significant 
enough to warrant separate disclosure.
Pensions*
None of the Executive Directors participate in the Group’s defined benefit final salary pension plan, which was closed to 
new entrants in 2002. Each Executive Director’s employer pension contribution rate is 15%, in line with the wider workforce.
All-employee Share Incentive Plan*
In line with the wider workforce, Executive Directors may participate in the GPE Share Incentive Plan, which is an HMRC  
tax-advantaged plan. Participants may save up to £150 from their monthly pre-tax salary to purchase shares. For every 
share purchased, GPE grants two matching shares. Shares acquired attract dividends paid by the Company, typically  
at the half-year and year end.
Governance
129
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Variable pay:
Executive Directors’ 2024 bonus outcome*
As explained in the Committee Chair’s statement and last year’s Annual Report, a new bonus scorecard was introduced for 
2023/24 as part of the wider Policy renewal to better align with the Company’s strategic priorities and to focus on relative TAR 
and key business priorities to drive our financial KPIs.
Key  
elements  
of strategy
Max.  
% of  
salary Measured by
Threshold 
performance  
target  
(20% payout)
Maximum 
performance  
target  
(100% payout)
Actual 
performance 
achieved
Actual 
performance  
level as a % 
of maximum
Bonus receivable (£000)
Toby  
Courtauld
Nick  
Sanderson
Dan
Nicholson
Market  
performance
(20% 
weighting)
1
2
3
4
5
6
30%
GPE Relative TAR1 (EPRA 
NTA growth + dividends) 
per share vs FTSE 350 
real estate companies 
excluding agencies†
Median
Upper  
quartile
Below 
median2  
(estimated)
0%2
£02
£02
£02
Optimising  
financial  
performance  
(during  
downturn)
(30% 
weighting – 
10% each)
1
2
3
4
5
15%
Rent achieved on market 
lettings during year vs ERV 
(as per CBRE valuation 
at start of year) – ‘%  
beat to market rent’†
31 March 2023 
ERV
3.5% above  
ERV
9.1% above 
ERV
100%
£101,799
£70,038
£57,055
15%
Vacancy rate at year end 
(including completed 
development/refurbished  
space during year)†
8%
6%
4.4%4
100%
£101,799
£70,038
£57,055
15%
Maintain appropriate 
liquidity
£150m
£350m
£433m5
100%
£101,799
£70,038
£57,055
Transforming  
the business  
and putting  
customers 
first
(15%  
weighting – 
5% each)
2
3
4
5
6
7.5%
Hitting planning 
milestones in year 
(combination of  
planning submissions  
and planning approvals 
across entire portfolio)
50% of major 
and 50% of 
minor in-scope 
applications 
approved
All in-scope 
applications 
approved
50% of major 
and 100% 
of minor 
applications 
approved
50%
£25,449
£17,510
£14,264
7.5%
Commitments to new  
Flex space over the year† 
30,000 sq ft
100,000 sq ft
102,353 sq ft
100%
£50,899
£35,019
£28,527
7.5%
Market leading office 
customer NPS† 
+20 points
>+40 points
+30.2 points
60.8%
£30,947
£21,292
£17,344
Delivering  
our Roadmap 
to Net Zero
(15%  
weighting – 
7.5% each)
1
5 
6
11.25% Reduction in energy 
consumption (targets 
set each year against 
Roadmap)†
191 kWh/m2
<174 kWh/m2
149.7 kWh/m2 100%
£76,349
£52,529
£42,791
11.25% All new developments  
to be net zero or on  
track to be net zero†
50%
100%
83.33% 6
75%
£57,262
£39,397
£32,093
Personal  
and business  
culture
(20% 
weighting 
– 10% for 
personal 
objectives,  
5% and 5%)
15%
Personal  
objectives (reduced  
from historic 15%)
Partial 
achievement 
of personal 
objectives
Exceeding  
personal  
objectives
See pages  
131 and 132
Toby Courtauld 
70%
Nick Sanderson 
70%
Dan Nicholson 
65%
£71,259
£49,027
£37,085
7.5%
Maintaining and 
nurturing a positive and 
inclusive culture (measured 
through employee 
engagement and inclusion 
index survey scores)
Score between 
65% and 70%
Score above 
80%
74%
50%
£25,450
£17,510
£14,263
7.5%
Achievement  
against gender and 
diversity targets3
Progress made 
against both 
targets
Both targets 
achieved
Progress 
made against 
both targets
20%
£10,180
£7,004
£5,705
Total
% of max
£653,192
64.2% 
£449,402
64.2%
£363,237
63.7%
†	 On a straight-line basis.
1 	 Denotes strategic priorities as set out on pages 14 and 15.
1.	 As with the previous arrangements, any dividends will be deducted from the base figure from the point of distribution (as it is not realistic to 
deliver growth after capital has been repaid to shareholders), except where reflected in some other way such as through a share consolidation.
2.	 Estimated based on information available as of 19 May 2024. The actual outcome will be confirmed in next year’s Annual Report.
3.	 Objectives are to achieve (i) 40% women in senior leadership roles; and (ii) 20% of management roles to be filled by colleagues identifying with 
an Office for National Statistics ethnic minority category, each by March 2025. Targets for March 2024: (i) 34% and (ii) 17%.
4.	 The actual vacancy rate at the year-end was 1.3%. To ensure that the measure operated as intended when the targets were set, the Committee  
added back schemes which had been scheduled to be completed in the period, increasing this figure to 4.4%.
5.	 Excludes £200 million undrawn short-term facility arranged in the year to ensure that the measure operated as intended when the targets were set.
6.	 A strict interpretation of the performance condition implied a 100% vesting, however the Committee felt that this was not intended and calculated  
the outturn with New City Court, for which original planning was declined, regarded as a non-achievement.
130
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Executive Directors’ personal objectives*
Under the new bonus system for the 2023/24 bonus year, the weighting on personal objectives was reduced from 15% to 10% 
of the total opportunity. These objectives, approved by the Committee, are designed to focus on the delivery of the strategic 
priorities and the successful management of risk for both 2023/24 and the longer term. Following consideration of achievement 
against the Executive Directors’ personal objectives set at the beginning of the year as listed below, the Committee awarded 
Toby Courtauld, Nick Sanderson and Dan Nicholson 80%, 80% and 75% respectively for performance against personal objectives 
but lowered the bonus payout by 10% each at the request of the Executive Directors in recognition of the challenging market 
conditions and to align with the shareholder experience.
Measure
Score
Key achievements
Execute approved 
strategy and operational 
excellence
CEO
45%/60%
CF&OO
45%/60%
ED
40%/55%
Shared
	
– Determined and executed major capital allocation activities, including new development  
and refurbishment commitments.
	
– Drove growth of Flex space to more than 500,000 sq ft.
	
– Grew Fully Managed annualised net operating income to over £8.5m.
	
– Delivered two Flex acquisitions and one HQ acquisition.
	
– Exceeded leasing targets; beating both void and ERV targets.
	
– Refreshed Net Promoter Score and new customer services KPIs.
CEO
	
– Presented and secured Board approval for a return to targeted acquisitions strategy.
	
– Flex, Customer and Digital/technology strategies all addressed through team changes.
	
– Drove sustainability strategy with notable circular economy successes at 2 Aldermanbury Square, 
French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street and Minerva House. Oversaw development of 
Our Roadmap to Net Zero v.2.0.
CF&OO
	
– Led debt financing activity. 
	
– Worked with CEO on ‘Customer First’ strategy implementation.
	
– Oversaw growth in net operating income from Fully Managed spaces.
	
– Oversaw delivery of £1.5 million of social value under our Social Impact Strategy.
ED
	
– Ensured that sustainability remained central to operational performance with use  
of new materials and driving down carbon footprint of development schemes.
	
– Planning permission secured at Minerva House and French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street.
	
– Oversaw completion of two property sales (Brook Street and Poland Street) as well as 
headlease regears.
Governance
131
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Measure
Score
Key achievements
Develop the team
CEO
25%/30%
CF&OO
27%/30%
ED
25%/30%
Shared
	
– Delivered restructure of the leadership team to meet new strategy.
	
– Identified and developed potential successors, conducted Company-wide Talent Review.
CEO
	
– Ensuring the team is well positioned to lead the refocus of our strategy on targeted acquisitions.
	
– Development of direct reports through mentoring and coaching.
CF&OO
	
– Completed roll out of Customer First training throughout the business to customer partners.
	
– Restructure of Customer Experience, marketing and finance teams to align with stakeholder 
needs.
	
– Elevated senior employees into new roles with Customer Experience and Flex.
	
– Focus on development and growth for high-potential leadership successors.
ED
	
– Provided support and commercial oversight and leadership to the Portfolio Management, 
Investment, Development and Project Management Teams.
	
– Restructured health & safety function.
Champion our purpose, 
live our values
CEO
10%/10%
CF&OO
8%/10%
ED
10%/15%
Shared
	
– Maintained strong employee engagement scores.
	
– Demonstrated role model behaviours.
	
– Embedded the ethos of sustainable spaces into all our processes.
	
– Diversity and inclusion initiatives progressed. Stretch target of 60% exceeded with 66.6% female 
hires into roles above £75,000. Ensured that all recruitment shortlists have equal gender splits.
CEO
	
– Provided inspirational leadership throughout a significant period of change during the 
restructuring process.
	
– Delivered regular internal communications to ensure clarity of strategic vision and performance.
CF&OO
	
– Role model behaviours and provided strong support to rising leaders of the business.
	
– Implemented means of publishing diversity representation statistics on a quarterly basis.
ED
	
– Increased leadership and oversight of direct reports while promoting empowerment.
Total Performance  
Assessment
CEO
80%/100%
CF&OO
80%/100%
ED
75%/100%
Total Bonus  
Assessment
(following a 10% reduction 
to the performance 
assessment at the request 
of the Executive Directors, 
as explained above)
CEO
70%/100%
CF&OO
70%/100%
ED
65%/100%
While each of the Executive Directors was separately assessed, they inevitably had a number of common objectives so the 
above table identifies both individual and shared objectives. In each case, their contribution to the delivery of those objectives 
was considered.
Executive Directors’ personal objectives continued
132
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Executive Directors’ LTIPs*
Anticipated vesting of 2021 LTIP awards
The table below sets out the anticipated vesting of the 2021 LTIP awards in June 2024, together with indicative payouts for the 
Executive Directors. The anticipated value of these awards at vesting reflects the disclosure in the single figure table on page 129.
Anticipated vesting of LTIP awards granted in the year ended 31 March 2022, vesting in the year ending 31 March 2025, is included 
in the 2024 single figure table.
Key elements 
of strategy
% of award
Measured by
Threshold 
performance  
target (20%)
Maximum 
performance  
target (100%)
Estimated 
performance
Estimated  
vesting level as at 
19 May 2024  
as a percentage 
of maximum by
vesting date1
Shareholder 
value
50%
Relative Total Shareholder Return  
(based on a three-year 
performance period)
Median
Upper  
quartile
Below 
Median
0%
Absolute 
performance
50%
Absolute Total Accounting Return  
(based on a three-year 
performance period)
3% p.a.
7% p.a.
-5.5% p.a.  
(actual)
0%
Total 
(estimated)
0%
1.	 Toby Courtauld and Nick Sanderson’s 2021 LTIP is due to vest on 7 June 2024. For the TAR target, the performance period for the 2021 awards is the three-year 
period to 31 March 2024. For the TSR element, the vesting period is the three-year period from the award date (7 June 2021) and compares the Company’s TSR 
to that of the constituents, at the date of grant, of the FTSE 350 Real Estate Index excluding agencies.
Confirmed vesting of 2020 LTIP awards
The figures provided in last year’s Annual Report for the 2020 LTIP awards were disclosed on an estimated basis. The table below 
sets out the confirmed performance outcomes of the 2020 LTIP awards that resulted in a 0% vesting following the expiry of the 
three-year performance period on 29 July 2023.
Key elements 
of strategy
% of award
Measured by
Threshold 
performance  
target (20%)
Maximum 
performance  
target (100%)
Performance
Confirmed 
percentage  
of maximum  
at end of 
performance 
period  
(29 July 2023)
Shareholder 
value
50%
Relative Total Shareholder Return  
(based on a three-year 
performance period)
Median
Upper  
quartile
20.8th  
percentile
0%
Absolute 
performance
50%
Total Accounting Return  
(based on a three-year 
performance period)
868p
925p
795p
0%
Total
0%
Number of shares at the end of the performance period for 2020 LTIP awards
No. of shares awarded  
as nil cost options
% overall vesting
No. of shares under  
option at the end of the
performance period1
Toby Courtauld
317,906
0
0
Nick Sanderson
218,722
0
0
1.	 The LTIP awards made in 2020 are subject to a five-year release period, comprising a three-year performance period (to 29 July 2023) followed by 
a further two-year holding period. No share options will become exercisable on the fifth anniversary of the date of award because no options vested 
after the three-year performance period.
Governance
133
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Outstanding share awards*
The following tables provide details of outstanding share awards under the LTIP, RSP, DSBP and the performance measures that 
apply to the awards. All awards were granted in the form of nil cost options.
Executive Director
Date of grant
Basis of award
Face value  
of award 
made  
£000
Number  
of shares 
under
award1,2
Percentage  
of award 
receivable for 
threshold 
performance
End of 
performance/
underpin period
Performance  
measures
Toby Courtauld
LTIP
7 June 20213
300% of salary
1,873
255,587
20%
6 June 2024
TSR – 50%
TAR Target – 50%
27 May 2022
300% of salary
1,939
300,391
20%
26 May 2025
TSR – 50%
TAR Target – 50%
DSBP
2 May 2021
40% of bonus
88
12.410
n/a
n/a
n/a
27 May 2022
40% of bonus
211
32,652
n/a
n/a
n/a
2 June 2023
40% of bonus
252
51,486
n/a
n/a
n/a
RSP
7 July 2023
150% of salary
1,018
241,024
n/a
6 July 2026
n/a – subject
to underpin5
Total
893,550
Nick Sanderson
LTIP
7 June 20213
300% of salary
1,289
175,845
20%
6 June 2024
TSR – 50%
TAR Target – 50%
27 May 2022
300% of salary
1,334
206,671
20%
26 May 2025
TSR – 50%
TAR Target – 50%
DSBP
2 May 2021
40% of bonus
64
9,075
n/a
n/a
n/a
27 May 2022
40% of bonus
145
22,465
n/a
n/a
n/a
2 June 2023
40% of bonus
175
35,832
n/a
n/a
n/a
RSP
7 July 2023
150% of salary
700
165,826
n/a
6 July 2026
n/a – subject
to underpin5
Total
615,714
Dan Nicholson4
LTIP
27 May 20223
300% of salary
1,087
168,357
20%
26 May 2025
TSR – 50%
TAR Target – 50%
DSBP
 27 May 2022
40% of bonus
54
8,377
n/a
n/a
n/a
2 June 2023
40% of bonus
138
28,190
n/a
n/a
n/a
RSP
7 July 2023
150% of bonus
571
135,084
n/a
6 July 2026
n/a – subject
to underpin5
Total
340,008
1.	 For all awards, the face value is calculated on the five-day average share price prior to the date of grant.  
For the 2021 LTIP, this was up to and including 4 June 2021, being £7.33. For the 2022 LTIP, this was up to and including 26 May 2022, being £6.46. For the 
2023 RSP, this was up to and including 6 July 2023, being £4.22. For the 2021 DSBP, this was up to and including 1 May 2021, being £7.09. For the 2022 DSBP, 
this was up to and including 26 May 2022, being £6.455. For the 2023 DSBP, this was up to and including 1 June 2023, being £4.896.
2.	 In addition, a cash sum equivalent to the value of dividends on the number of plan shares which vest in respect of the period from the award date 
to the expiry of the applicable two-year holding period will be payable at the end of that period.
3.	 The estimated overall outcome for the 4 June 2021 LTIP as at 19 May 2024 is 0%. This would equate to nil shares vesting for each of Toby Courtauld 
and Nick Sanderson.
4.	 Dan Nicholson joined the Board on 6 September 2021 and was entitled to his first LTIP and DSBP awards in 2022.
5.	 The underpin is the same as that set out on page 136, i.e. the vesting is subject to a robust underpin allowing the Committee to reduce the vesting of awards 
in whatever circumstances it considers to be appropriate. The Committee will also specifically consider reducing vesting levels in the event of a breach of 
the financial covenants of the Group’s principal debt facilities; failure to make satisfactory progress in delivering our Sustainability of Intent; or there being 
material damage to the reputation of the Company.
2021 and 2022 LTIP awards – performance measures*
Performance measure over three years
% of award
Vesting 
level
Start of  
measurement period
20%
Straight-line vesting  
between these points
100%
2021 LTIP Award
Total Accounting Return
50%
3% p.a.
7% p.a.
1 April prior to grant date
TSR against constituents of FTSE 350  
Real Estate Sector (excluding agencies)
50%
Median
Upper  
quartile
Grant date
2022 LTIP Award
Total Accounting Return
50%
3% p.a.
8% p.a.
1 April prior to grant date
TSR against constituents of FTSE 350  
Real Estate Sector (excluding agencies)
50%
Median
Upper  
quartile
Grant date
134
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Executive Director remuneration from other roles
Executive Directors are able to accept external Board appointments with the consent of the Board. Any fees received by 
an Executive Director for such an external appointment can be retained by the individual. Toby Courtauld is a Non-Executive 
Director of Liv-ex Limited, for which he received no remuneration during the year. He also received no remuneration for 
serving as a Director of the New West End Company.
Nick Sanderson is a Trustee of the Outward Bound Trust, for which he received no remuneration during the year. Dan Nicholson  
is a Non-Executive Director of Bioregional Homes Limited, for which he also received no remuneration during the year.
Statement of Executive Directors’ shareholdings and share interests*
Executive Directors are required to hold a minimum of 300% of base salary in shares. The table below sets out their holdings 
against the requirement and their beneficial and conditional ownership as at 31 March 2024. Dan Nicholson joined the Board 
on 6 September 2021. As with the other Executive Directors, Dan will be required to build up a shareholding of 300% of base 
salary and to retain all shares that are vested to him, net of any tax liabilities, until the requirement is satisfied. 
Director
Beneficial ownership
Conditional ownership6
Shareholding 
requirement
met9,10
Comparator 
to 2023
Number  
of shares
owned1
SIP  
Matching 
shares 
subject to 
forfeiture
Total  
beneficial 
ownership 
2,3,4,5
LTIP/RSP  
subject to 
performance 
conditions/
underpins
LTIP awards 
which have 
met their 
performance
conditions 
and remain 
subject to a 
holding 
period7
Deferred 
Share  
Bonus
Plan8
Total  
beneficial 
and  
conditional 
ownership  
as at  
31 March  
2024
Total 
beneficial 
and 
conditional  
ownership 
as at  
31 March 
2023
Toby  
Courtauld
1,399,022
2,018
1,401,040
797,002
18,686
96,548
2,313,276
2,337,379
835% – Yes
1,112%
Nick  
Sanderson
281,531
2,016
283,547
548,342
12,856
67,372
912,117
927,891
271%11
326%
Dan  
Nicholson
20,556
1,564
22,120
303,441
–
36,567
362,128
177,787
42%12
1%
1.	 Excludes SIP shares that are subject to forfeiture.
2.	 Holdings are calculated based on the share price as at 31 March 2024 of £3.878.
3.	 Beneficial interests include shares held directly or indirectly by connected persons.
4.	 The Executive Directors did not exercise any share options in the year ended 31 March 2024. Between 1 April 2024 and 19 May 2024, Toby Courtauld and  
Dan Nicholson each acquired 37 Partnership shares and 74 conditional Matching shares and Nick Sanderson acquired 38 Partnership Shares and 76 Matching 
Shares under the SIP. In addition, under the SIP, 40 Matching shares vested to each of Toby Courtauld and Nick Sanderson. Otherwise there were no changes  
in their shareholdings during that period.
5.	 40% of the Executive Directors’ annual bonuses for the year ended 31 March 2024 will be deferred into shares for three years under the Deferred Share 
Bonus Plan (DSBP). The number of shares awarded will be disclosed following the awards, in the 2025 Annual Report. In respect of their annual bonuses 
for the year ended 31 March 2023, Toby Courtauld, Nick Sanderson and Dan Nicholson were granted DSBP awards over 51,486, 35,832 and 28,190 
shares respectively.
6.	 LTIP, RSP and DSBP awards are granted in the form of nil cost options. A nil vesting of the 2021 LTIP awards has been assumed based on the information 
available as at 19 May 2024.
7.	 Consistent with best practice, estimated after-tax shares that will be retained after the cessation of the two-year holding period are included in 
the shareholding requirement (53% of shares retained).
8.	 Consistent with best practice, estimated after-tax shares retained are included in the shareholding requirement (53% of shares retained).
9.	 Post-cessation shareholding guidelines came into effect following the approval of the Policy at the 2020 AGM. Executive Directors are expected 
to retain the lower of actual shares held at cessation and shares equal to 300% of salary for two years post-cessation. Shares retained following 
vesting of LTIP, RSP and DSBP awards granted after the 2020 AGM will be held in via escrow/a nominee arrangement to enable enforcement of the  
post-cessation guidelines.
10.	Executive Directors are required to hold 300% of their base salary and are expected to retain the after-tax shares received on the exercise of awards 
until they have acquired the necessary shares to meet their shareholding requirement.
11.	The fall in share price over the year resulted in Nick Sanderson’s holding falling moderately below the guideline level. He will not sell any shares other 
than to meet tax liabilities until this requirement is met. 
12. Dan Nicholson joined the Board with effect from 6 September 2021 and is working towards his minimum shareholding requirement.
Governance
135
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Executive Directors’ remuneration for the year ending 31 March 2025
Statement of implementation of Policy for the year ending 31 March 2025
The Policy and its implementation for the Executive Directors for the forthcoming financial year is summarised below. 
For information on the Chair of the Board and Non-Executive Directors, please refer to page 138.
Salary
Executive Director
Year ending  
31 March 2025
£0001
Year ended  
31 March 2024
£0001
Base salary  
increase
Toby Courtauld
692
679
2%
Nick Sanderson
476
467
2%
Dan Nicholson
388
380
2%
1.	 Rounded to the nearest £1,000.
Executive Directors have received an increase in salary below the all-colleague average increase of 4.9%. In reviewing 
the salaries of the Executive Directors, the Committee has also taken account of both the individual’s and the Company’s 
performance and the employment conditions and salary increases awarded to employees across the Group.
Pension and benefits
There have been no changes to the benefits and pension provision for the Executive Directors.
Bonus for the year ending 31 March 2025
The target and maximum annual bonus potentials will remain unchanged at 75% and 150% of salary respectively for the 
Executive Directors. As with the existing Policy, under the proposed new Policy, 40% of any annual bonus outcome will be 
deferred into shares for three years under the Deferred Share Bonus Plan.
The scorecard measures will be consistent with those for 2023/24 except that, as explained on page 127, the Flex measure will 
change from a space commitment to a net operating income measure, a deployment of capital measure will replace the 
liquidity measure, the development measure will focus on achieving key development milestones in the year and there will be 
some minor definitional changes to the NPS metric to capture retail as well as office customers. Furthermore, the weighting 
of measures will be adjusted, increasing the total weightings on financial measures from 50% to 60% as follows:
2024/25 Bonus weightings
Financial measures
Total weighting
Non-financial measures
Total weighting
Relative TAR
20%
Development milestones
5%
Rent achieved vs ERV
10%
Customer NPS
5%
Vacancy rate
10%
Energy consumption
5% (previously 7.5%)
Deployment of capital
10% 
Net zero developments
5% (previously 7.5%)
Flex net operating income
10% (replaces 5% Flex space measure)
Personal objectives
10%
Positive and inclusive culture
5%
Diversity targets
5%
Total
60%
40%
The Committee is of the opinion that, given the commercial sensitivity around GPE’s business, disclosing precise targets for the Annual 
Bonus Plan in advance would not be in the best interests of shareholders or the Company. Objectives, performance achieved and 
awards made will be published at the end of the performance period so shareholders can fully assess the basis for any payouts.
Restricted Share Plan awards for the year ending 31 March 2025
Performance measure over three years
Award as %  
of base salary
Subject to underpins as described in full in the Remuneration Policy
150%
The maximum potential award for the 2024 Restricted Share Plan Award is 150% of base salary, being 50% of the 300% of base 
salary awarded under historic LTIPs. This conversion rate is reflective of common market practice. The awards, granted in the 
form of nil cost options, will be subject to the underpins set out in the Policy. Alongside the operation of a robust underpin allowing 
the Committee to reduce the vesting of awards in whatever circumstances it considers to be appropriate, the Committee will 
also specifically consider reducing vesting levels in the event of a breach of the financial covenants of the Group’s principal 
debt facilities; failure to make satisfactory progress in delivering our Sustainability Statement of Intent; or there being material 
damage to the reputation of the Company. Following a three-year vesting period, the 2024 RSP awards will be subject to a 
two-year holding period, whereby participants will not be permitted to exercise any performance-vested awards until the 
fifth anniversary of the award date. The holding period will generally continue to operate post-cessation of employment.
136
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Chief Executive £000
818
818
818
818
1,038
2,894
519
1,038
2,375
1,038
2,500
0
1,000
500
1,500
2,000
3,000
3,500
Maximum
On target
Minimum
818
1,557
3,313
1,038
Maximum with 50%
share price increase
Executive Director £000
2,500
0
1,000
500
1,500
2,000
3,000
3,500
Fixed
Annual bonus
RSP
Maximum with 50%
share price increase
458
458
458
458
582
1,622
291
582
1,331
582
458
873
1,913
582
Maximum
On target
Minimum
Chief Financial & Operating Officer £000
2,500
0
1,000
500
1,500
2,000
3,000
3,500
Maximum with 50%
share price increase
570
570
570
570
714
1,998
357
714
1,641
714
570
1,071
2,355
714
Maximum
On target
Minimum
Executive Director remuneration scenarios based on performance
The charts below set out the potential remuneration receivable by Executive Directors for minimum (where performance is below 
threshold for variable awards), on-target and maximum performance. Potential reward opportunities are based on the Policy 
and applied to salaries for the year ending 31 March 2025. It should be noted that the projected values exclude the impact of any 
dividend accrual.
Governance
137
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Chair and Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration
Single figure table annual fees for year ended 31 March 2024*
This section of the Report contains details of how the Policy for the Chair and Non-Executive Directors was implemented 
during the financial year ended 31 March 2024.
Name
Fees
Benefits
Totals
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
Richard Mully
256
244
21
21
258
246
Mark Anderson
75
72
–
–
75
72
Karen Green2
25
–
–
–
25
–
Nick Hampton3,4
85
74
–
–
85
74
Vicky Jarman4
82
77
–
–
82
77
Champa Magesh5
75
48
26
–
77
48
Alison Rose7
20
72
–
–
20
72
Emma Woods8
82
77
–
–
82
77
Total
700
664
4
2
704
666
1.	 Richard Mully’s benefits of less than £2,000 related to reimbursed travel (and related tax) for GPE meetings.
2.	 Karen Green joined the Board and each of its Committees on 1 December 2023.
3.	 Nick Hampton became Senior Independent Director from 30 March 2023.
4.	 Vicky Jarman succeeded Nick Hampton as Chair of the Audit Committee from 7 July 2022.
5.	 Champa Magesh joined the Board and each of its Committees on 1 August 2022.
6.	 Champa Magesh’s benefits of less than £2,000 related to reimbursed travel (and related tax) for GPE meetings.
7.	 Alison Rose stepped down from the Board and its Committees on 6 July 2023.
8.	 Emma Woods became Chair of the Remuneration Committee from 7 July 2022.
Shareholdings*
31 March 2024 31 March 2023
Richard Mully
60,000
31,379
Mark Anderson
2,451
2,451
Karen Green
–
–
Nick Hampton
2,500
2,500
Vicky Jarman
2,708
2,708
Champa Magesh
–
–
Alison Rose
–
–
Emma Woods
–
–
There were no changes in the shareholdings of the Chair and Non-Executive Directors in office between 1 April 2024 and 19 May 2024. 
The reported figures reflect the position at the stated dates or date of appointment if later/date of retirement if earlier.
Annual fees for year ending 31 March 2025
The table below sets out the fee rates for the Chair of the Board and Non-Executive Directors for the year ending 31 March 2025. 
The fees of the Chair and the base fees of the Non-Executive Directors have been increased by approximately 2%, being below 
the average of 4.9% awarded to colleagues. Fee levels for the Chair and Non-Executive Directors are assessed having regard 
to individual responsibility and fees paid to Non-Executive Directors in the wider FTSE 250.
1 April 2023 to  
31 March 2024  
£
From  
1 April 2024  
(per annum)
£
Chair fee
256,000
261,100
Non-Executive Director base fee
61,500
62,700
Senior Independent Director fee
10,000
10,000
Audit or Remuneration Committee Chair
12,500
12,500
Audit or Remuneration Committee Member
5,000
5,000
Nomination Committee Member
3,350
3,350
138
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Other disclosures
Percentage change in Board remuneration vs Group employees
The table below shows the percentage change in remuneration/fees for the years ended 31 March 2021, 31 March 2022, 
31 March 2023 and 31 March 2024 for each of the Directors who served during the year ended 31 March 2024 (including salary, 
taxable benefits and annual bonus) compared to that for an average Group employee (noting that the Group has been used 
rather than parent company on the basis that there are no Company employees).
Name
Base salary/fees
Taxable benefits10
Bonus11
Change
Change
Change
2020/21
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2020/21
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
Average employee1
+5.1%
+3.2%
+6.2%
+6.6%
+4.1%
-20,1%
-0.3%
+15.2%
+71.3%
+13.5%8
+12.4%
Executive Directors
Toby Courtauld
+1.5%
+1.5%
+3.5%
+5.0%
-3.6%
-38.5%
0%
+12.5%
+139.5%
+19.5%
+3.7%
Nick Sanderson
+1.5%
+1.5%
+3.5%
+5.0%
-22.7%
-12.5%
+18.6%
+5.6%
+125.5%
+20.9%
+2.3%
Dan Nicholson2
n/a
n/a
80.1%
+5.0%
n/a
n/a
+100%
+33.3%
n/a
+155.6%
+5.2%
Non-Executive 
Directors
Richard Mully (Chair)
-5.0%
0%
3.8%
+4.9%
-100%
+100%
+100%
+0%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Mark Anderson3
n/a
0%
75.6%
+4.2%
n/a
–
–
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
Karen Green4
n/a
n/a
n/a
-%
n/a
–
–
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
Nick Hampton5,6
-4.2%
0%
-1.3%
+14.9%
-100%
–
–
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
Vicky Jarman6
-2.9%
0%
+10.0%
+6.5%
–
–
–
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
Champa Magesh7
–
–
0%
+56.3%
–
–
–
+100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Alison Rose8
-2.9%
0%
+2.9%
-72.2%
–
–
–
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
Emma Woods9
n/a
n/a
+541.7
+6.5%
n/a
–
–
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
1.	 Based on all employees who were employed for the full consecutive financial years being compared. Average employee pay has been calculated  
on a full-time equivalent basis.
2.	 Dan Nicholson joined the Group in September 2021, part-way through the financial year. His remuneration in 2021/22 reflected this period of service, 
whereas his remuneration from 2022/23 was for a full year’s service, explaining his large percentage increase over the two years.
3.	 Mark Anderson joined the Board on 1 September 2021.
4.	 Karen Green joined the Board on 1 December 2023.
5.	 Nick Hampton become Senior Independent Director on 30 March 2023.
6.	 Vicky Jarman succeeded Nick Hampton as Chair of the Audit Committee from 7 July 2022.
7.	 Champa Magesh joined the Board from 1 August 2022.
8.	 Alison Rose stepped down from the Board on 6 July 2023.
9.	 Emma Woods joined the Board on 1 February 2022 and became Chair of the Remuneration Committee from 7 July 2022.
10.	Taxable benefits from 31 March 2023, in line with the single figure table on page 129, have been updated to include: private medical insurance, 
membership subscriptions, travel expenses, luncheon vouchers, Employee Assistance Programme and entertainment. Prior years included death 
in service, life assurance and permanent health insurance which are not taxable benefits in line with HMRC guidelines.
11.	 Executive Directors have a higher proportion of their remuneration linked to variable pay and Company performance for greater alignment with shareholders. 
The percentage change in bonus payments will therefore fluctuate according to variable pay outcomes each year. The payout for the 2020/21 annual 
bonus financial measures was nil, resulting in the higher percentage change in bonuses for 2022/23.
Governance
139
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Ten-year Chief Executive remuneration package 
The table below shows the Chief Executive’s (Toby Courtauld throughout) remuneration package over the past ten years, 
together with incentive payout/vesting as compared to the maximum opportunity.
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Single figure of total remuneration (£000)
3,689
2,650
1,420
1,174
905
1,599
984
1,425
1,417
1,456
Bonus payout (as % of 
maximum opportunity)
48%
100%
20%
37%
19%
31%
23.9%
56.3%
65%
64.2%
Long-term incentive vesting rates  
(as % of maximum opportunity)
81%
58%
33%
10%
0%
28.8%
0%
7.4%
0%2
0%1
1.	 Based on estimated performance as at 19 May 2024.
2.	 This reflects the actual LTIP performance outcome of 0% as referred to in the single figure table on page 129. The figure provided in last year’s Annual Report, 
of 0%, was disclosed on an estimated basis.
Total Shareholder Return performance
The following graph shows the Total Shareholder Returns for the Company for each of the last ten financial years compared 
to the FTSE 350 Real Estate Index (excluding agencies). The Company is a constituent of the FTSE 350 Real Estate Index and 
the Committee considers this benchmark to be the most appropriate for illustrating the Company’s performance.
Total Shareholder Return over ten years (indexed) 
31 March
2014
31 March
2015
31 March
2016
31 March
2017
31 March
2018
31 March
2019
31 March
2020
31 March
2024
31 March
2023
31 March
2022
31 March
2021
Great Portland Estates plc
Source: Refinitiv Datastream.
FTSE 350 Real Estate – Sector (Excluding Agencies)
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
CEO pay ratio
Although the Company has fewer than 250 employees and is not, therefore, subject to any legal requirement to include 
such ratios, the Committee considers inclusion of the ratio to be reflective of best practice and includes this on a voluntary 
basis. The Committee notes the general preference of institutional shareholders for companies to use statutory Method A 
and prepared the calculations on that basis. However, for a company with a relatively small number of employees (134 as  
at 31 March 2024), the ratios can be unduly impacted by joiners and leavers who may not participate in the full suite of 
remuneration arrangements in the year of joining or leaving. Accordingly, the Committee modified the statutory basis to 
exclude any employee not employed throughout the financial year. In all other respects, Method A was followed so the 
following tables refer to modified Method A being adopted.
The Company believes that a bias towards variable pay for senior executives is the most appropriate means of both incentivising 
the senior executives and aligning them with shareholders. The ratios will therefore fluctuate according to variable pay  
outcomes each year. Variable pay outcomes were broadly consistent in 2022/23 and 2023/24 and the ratios have therefore 
remained broadly consistent in these years. Overall, the outcomes and the resulting ratios are considered appropriate.
140
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Ratio of the pay of the Chief Executive to that of the UK lower quartile, median and upper quartile employees
Year
Method
Pay ratio
25th percentile
50th percentile (median)
75th percentile
31 March 2024
Modified Method A
17.3:1
12.1:1
6.5:1
31 March 2023
Modified Method A
18.0:1
12.6:1
6.7:1
31 March 2022
Modified Method A
19.9:1
15.4:1
7.2:1
31 March 2021
Modified Method A
15.1:1
11.2:1
5.8:1
31 March 2020
Modified Method A
24.1:1
18.2:1
8.7:1
Additional information on the ratio of the pay of the Chief Executive to that of employees
	
– Employee pay data is based on full-time equivalent pay for UK employees as at 31 March 2024. For each employee, 
total pay is calculated in line with the single figure methodology (i.e. fixed pay accrued during the financial year 
and the value of performance-based incentive awards vesting in relation to the performance year).
	
– Employee pay data excludes leavers and joiners to help ensure data is on a like-for-like basis. No other calculation 
adjustments or assumptions have been made.
	
– Chief Executive pay is as per the single total figure of remuneration for 2024, as disclosed on page 129.
	
– The 2024 ratio will be re-stated in the 2025 Directors’ remuneration report (if required) to take account of the final  
LTIP vesting data for eligible employees and for the Chief Executive.
The Committee has considered the pay data for the three individuals identified for 2024 and believes that it fairly reflects 
pay at the relevant quartiles among the UK employee population. Each of the individuals identified was a full-time employee 
during the year and received remuneration in line with the Policy. The Company employs a highly skilled and experienced 
workforce which leads to a narrower CEO ratio than at many other listed companies with a different employee base. The ratios 
reflect this and are felt appropriate in this context. This year, there was no LTIP vesting and, in a year in which the LTIP did vest, 
the ratio would widen given the greater focus on variable pay for more senior levels.
Salary and total remuneration used to calculate the pay ratio
Chief Executive
£000
25th percentile
£000
50th percentile (median)
£000
75th percentile
£000
Total salary
679
58
76
130
Total remuneration (single figure)
1,456
84
120
224
Employee Share Trust
Upon the vesting of share awards, shares used to satisfy awards under the LTIP, RSP and Deferred Share Bonus Plan are 
transferred out of the Great Portland Estates plc LTIP Employee Share Trust (the Trust), a discretionary trust established 
to facilitate the operation of the Company’s share plans. The shares to satisfy vested awards have been purchased by the 
Trustees of the Trust in the open market. The number of shares held by the Trust as at 31 March 2024 was 887,159 (2023: 877,159).
Dilution
The Company currently funds the Trustees to purchase all of the shares required to satisfy awards under the Company’s share 
plans and no shares have been issued to satisfy any grants made in the last ten years. However, if the Company decided to issue 
new shares to meet these awards, the Company would operate all of its share incentive arrangements within The Investment 
Association (IA) Guidelines on dilution. The following table sets out the level of dilution against the IA limits for all share plans 
and discretionary plans in respect of the outstanding awards should the Company issue shares rather than use purchased 
shares held in Trust.
Maximum
As at 31 March 20241
10% dilution in ten years (all plans)
1.23%
5% dilution in ten years (discretionary plans)
1.28%
1.	 This figure shows the number of shares required to satisfy all outstanding awards as at 31 March 2024 as a percentage of the Company’s issued share 
capital were these to be satisfied by the issue of new shares. This does not include vested awards that have been satisfied using market purchased shares.
Governance
141
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ remuneration report continued
Relative importance of spend on pay
The table below sets out the relative importance of spend on pay in 2023 and 2024:
Relative importance of spend on pay £m
Overall spend on pay
Overall spend on dividend
2023
2024
2023
2024
+18.5%
27.6
32.7
0%
31.9
31.9
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Committee advisers
The Committee was advised during the year by FIT Remuneration Consultants LLP (FIT Rem) as independent remuneration 
consultants. FIT Rem, which was appointed by the Committee in August 2014 following a review of advisers, attends Committee 
meetings and provides advice on remuneration for the Executive Directors, analysis on all elements of the Directors’ 
remuneration policy and regular market and best practice updates. 
FIT Rem reports directly to the Committee and does not provide any other services to the Company.
The Committee is satisfied that the advice received from FIT Rem is independent and objective as FIT Rem complies with 
the Code of Conduct for Remuneration Consultants (which can be found at www.remunerationconsultantsgroup.com)
and provides no other advice to the Group. FIT Rem’s fees for the year to 31 March 2024 were £68,127.50 (2023: £112,056) 
which were charged on the basis of the time spent advising the Company.
Independent and objective performance certificates are provided to the Committee by Aon Hewitt on measurement 
of TSR performance targets for the LTIP. Fees paid to Aon Hewitt in respect of this were £10,750. Aon Hewitt also provides 
gender pay gap assistance and salary benchmarking to the Group and fees paid in relation to these totalled £15,000 
and £1,750 respectively.
142
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Statement of voting at the AGM
The following table shows the results of the remuneration related resolutions at the 2023 AGM:
It is the Committee’s policy to consult with major shareholders prior to any major changes to its Executive remuneration.
For
Against
Abstentions
2023 Directors’ remuneration report
197,428,528 (96.51%)
7,135,959 (3.49%)
3,186
2023 Directors’ remuneration policy
189,336,232 (92.56%)
15,228,255 (7.44%)
3,186
Consideration of shareholder views
When determining remuneration, the Committee takes into account the guidelines of investor bodies and shareholder views. 
The Committee is always open to feedback from shareholders on remuneration policy and arrangements, and commits to 
undertaking shareholder consultation in advance of any significant changes to the remuneration policy.
The Policy was subject to thorough consultation with our major shareholders and the main proxy voting advisers ahead of being 
approved by shareholders at the 2023 AGM.
Service agreements and payments for loss of office/payments to former Directors*
The policy of the Company is to have service contracts for Executive Directors with notice periods of one year. It is sometimes 
necessary when recruiting a new Executive Director to give a service contract with an initial term of up to 18 months, in which 
case a 12-month notice period may be given no earlier than six months from the start date of the contract.
Non-Executive Directors, who have letters of appointment, are subject to annual re-election under the Company’s Articles 
of Association and have a notice period of three months by either party. They are not eligible for payment in lieu of notice 
or any other payment on termination.
The following table sets out the dates of each of the Executive Directors’ service agreements and their unexpired term, the dates 
of the Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment and the date on which the Non-Executive Director is next subject to 
reappointment or re-election.
Executive
Date of service agreement 
Unexpired term (months)
Toby Courtauld
18 March 2002 (amended 2017)
12
Nick Sanderson
7 June 2011 (amended 2017)
12
Dan Nicholson
30 July 2021
12
Non-Executive
Date of appointment letter
Date when next subject to appointment or re-election
Richard Mully
12 October 2016
4 July 2024
Karen Green1
15 June 2023
4 July 2024
Nick Hampton
28 September 2016
4 July 2024
Vicky Jarman
22 January 2020
4 July 2024
Mark Anderson
30 July 2021
4 July 2024
Emma Woods
25 January 2022
4 July 2024
Champa Magesh
6 June 2022
4 July 2024
1.	 Karen Green was appointed to the Board on 1 December 2023 and will be subject to election at the next AGM on 4 July 2024.
No Directors received termination payouts or payments for loss of office in respect of the year and no former Director received 
any relevant payments.
This Report will be submitted to shareholders for approval at the AGM to be held on 4 July 2024.
Approved by the Board on 22 May 2024 and signed on its behalf by:
Emma Woods
Chair of the Remuneration Committee  
22 May 2024
Governance
143
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Report of the Directors
Strategic Report
The Group’s Strategic Report on pages 01 to 88 includes 
the Company’s business model and strategy, the principal 
risks and uncertainties facing the Group and how these 
are managed and mitigated, an indication of likely future 
developments in the Company and details of important 
events since the year ended 31 March 2024.
The purpose of the Annual Report is to provide information 
to the members of the Company, as a body. The Company, 
its Directors, employees, agents or advisers do not accept 
or assume responsibility to any other person to whom this 
document is shown or into whose hands it may come and 
any such responsibility or liability is expressly disclaimed. 
The Annual Report contains certain forward-looking 
statements with respect to the operations, performance 
and financial condition of the Group. By their nature, 
these statements involve uncertainty since future events 
and circumstances can cause results and developments 
to differ from those anticipated. The forward-looking 
statements reflect knowledge and information available 
at the date of preparation of this Annual Report. Nothing in 
this Annual Report should be construed as a profit forecast.
Results and dividends for the year
The Group’s results for the year are set out on pages 148 to 178. 
An interim dividend of 4.7 pence per share (2023: 4.7 pence) 
was paid on 4 January 2024, and the Directors propose to 
pay a final dividend of 7.9 pence per share on 8 July 2024 
to shareholders on the register of members as at the close 
of business on 31 May 2024. This makes a total of 12.6 pence 
per share (2023: 12.6 pence) for the year ended 31 March 2024.
Directors
Biographical details of the current Directors of the 
Company are shown on pages 94 and 95. Alison Rose 
also served as a Director during the year under review, 
stepping down from the Board on 6 July 2023.
In accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, 
all the current Directors will retire, and those who wish 
to continue to serve will offer themselves for election  
or re-election at the forthcoming Annual General 
Meeting (AGM).
Directors’ shareholdings
The interests of the Directors of the Company (and of their 
connected persons) in the shares of the Company, which 
have been notified to the Company in accordance with 
the UK Market Abuse Regulation, are set out in the Directors’ 
remuneration report on pages 135 and 138. The Directors’ 
remuneration report also sets out details of any changes 
in those interests between 31 March 2024 and 19 May 2024.
Directors’ indemnities and insurance
On 14 September 2007, an indemnity was given by the 
Company to the Directors in terms which comply with 
company law. The indemnity was in force during the 
year and remains in force at the date of this Report 
of the Directors.
The Company maintains directors’ and officers’ liability 
insurance and pension trustee liability insurance, both 
of which are reviewed annually.
Directors’ powers
The powers of the Directors are contained in the Company’s 
Articles of Association. These include powers, subject to relevant 
legislation, to authorise the issue and buyback of the Company’s 
shares by the Company, subject to authority being given 
to the Directors by the shareholders in a general meeting.
Appointment and replacement of Directors
The rules about the appointment and replacement of Directors 
are contained in the Company’s Articles of Association. 
Under the Articles of Association, every Director who held office 
on the date seven days before the date of notice of the AGM 
shall retire from office. A retiring Director shall be eligible for 
re-election at the AGM, and a Director who is re-elected will 
be treated as continuing in office without a break. This is in line 
with the UK Corporate Governance Code, which recommends 
that all Directors should be subject to annual re-election.
Changes to the Articles of Association must be approved 
by the Company’s shareholders in accordance with 
legislation in force from time to time.
Corporate governance statement
The information fulfilling the requirements of the corporate 
governance statement can be found in this Report of the 
Directors and on pages 89 to 143, all of which are incorporated 
into this Report of the Directors by reference.
Political donations
It is the Company’s policy not to make political donations 
or undertake any activities incurring political expenditure.
Annual General Meeting
Details of the Company’s AGM can be found in the Notice of AGM 
2024, which will be made available on the Company’s website at 
www.gpe.co.uk/investors/shareholder-information/agmgm
Additional disclosures
Disclosures required by Schedule 7, Large and Medium-sized 
Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 
2008 (as amended), to the extent not already disclosed 
or referred to in this Report of the Directors, can be found 
on the following pages, all of which are incorporated into 
this Report of the Directors by reference:
Page/s
Financial instruments
154, 171 to 173
Greenhouse gas emissions, 
energy consumption and 
energy efficiency action
37 to 62
Engagement with suppliers,  
customers and others
39 to 41, 48 to 51, 62,  
69 to 72 and 99 to 103
Research and development
01, 08, 14, 22 to 25, 26,  
27, 39 to 42, 69 to 70
Disclosures required by the Financial Conduct Authority’s 
Listing Rule 9.8.4R can be found on the following pages:
Page/s
Capitalised interest
158 and 163
Waiver of dividends
145
The Directors’ responsibilities statement is on page 146 and is 
incorporated into this Report of the Directors by reference. 
The ‘Other information’ found on pages 194 to 203 is also 
incorporated into this Report of the Directors by reference.
144
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Significant shareholdings
As at 31 March 2024, the Company had been notified, in 
accordance with the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure 
Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 5), of the following 
interests in the voting rights in its ordinary share capital:
Number of
voting rights1
%1
Nature of
holding1
Norges Bank  
Investment  
Management
32,829,313
12.93
Direct
T. Rowe Price  
Associates, Inc.
27,888,682
10.99
Indirect
BlackRock, Inc.
20,088,428
2,638,337
7.91
1.03
Indirect
Financial 
instruments
KKR Investment 
Management LLC
13,579,569
5.35
Indirect
1.	 As at date of notification.
In the period from 31 March 2024 to 19 May 2024, the Company 
received a further notification from BlackRock, Inc. disclosing  
that its interests in voting rights in the Company through indirect 
holdings and holdings of financial instruments had increased 
to 21,297,445 (8.38%) and 4,062,147 (1.59%) respectively.
Information provided to the Company under the Financial 
Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency 
Rules is publicly available via the regulatory information 
service and on the Company’s website.
Share capital and control
As at 31 March 2024, the issued share capital of the Company 
was 253,867,911 (2023: 253,867,911) ordinary shares of 154/19 pence 
each, all fully paid up and listed on the London Stock Exchange.
At the 2023 AGM, shareholders authorised the Company to 
make market purchases of up to 38,054,799 ordinary shares 
of 155/19 pence each, representing 14.99% of the issued share 
capital of the Company as at 29 May 2023, such authority 
to expire at the earlier of the conclusion of the 2024 AGM 
or 1 October 2024. No shares were purchased under that 
authority during the financial year. The Company is seeking 
to renew the authority at the forthcoming AGM, within the 
limits set out in the Company’s Notice of AGM 2024.
There are no restrictions on transfer or limitations on the 
holding of the ordinary shares. None of the shares carry 
any special rights with regard to the control of the Company. 
There are no known arrangements under which financial 
rights are held by a person other than the holder of the 
shares and no known agreements on restrictions on share 
transfers and voting rights. The Great Portland Estates plc 
LTIP Employee Share Trust (the Trust) is an employee share 
scheme which holds ordinary shares in the Company on trust 
for the benefit of employees within the Group. The Trustee of 
the Trust has the power to exercise all the rights and powers 
(including rights with regard to control of the Company) 
incidental to, and to generally act in relation to, the ordinary 
shares subject to the Trust in such manner as the Trustee in 
its absolute discretion thinks fit as if it were absolutely entitled 
to those ordinary shares. The Trustee has waived the right 
to receive dividends on the shares held in the Company.
Change of control
The Company has a number of unsecured borrowing 
facilities provided by various lenders. These facilities generally 
include provisions that may require any outstanding borrowings 
to be repaid or the alteration or termination of the facilities 
upon the occurrence of a change of control of the Company. 
The Company’s Restricted Share Plan, Long Term Incentive 
Plan, Deferred Share Bonus Plan, Restricted Share Plan 
and Annual Bonus Plan contain provisions relating to the 
vesting of awards in the event of a change of control.
Going concern
The Group’s business activities, together with the factors 
affecting its performance, the impact of recent macro-
economic uncertainty and weak UK growth, are set out in 
the Strategic Report on pages 01 to 88. Details of the finances 
of the Group, including its strong liquidity position, attractively 
priced borrowing facilities and favourable debt maturity profile, 
are set out in ‘Our financial results’ on pages 30 to 33 including 
‘Our capital strength’ on page 32 and in notes 9, 16 and 17 
of the financial statements on pages 152 to 178.
The Directors have reviewed the current and projected financial 
position of the Group, making reasonable assumptions about 
future trading performance, with particular focus on macro-
economic conditions in which the Group is operating, including 
weak UK growth, the ongoing economic disruption from 
geopolitical tensions, a high inflationary environment and 
elevated interest rates. This included a going concern scenario 
to consider the impact of market disruption on the Group’s cash 
balances, its capital commitments, its debt maturity profile, 
including undrawn facilities and the long-term nature of customer 
leases. The going concern scenario did not include the proceeds of 
the intended rights issue. The Directors also conducted extensive 
stress testing, including sensitising significant increases in the 
cost of development to meet sustainability requirements as 
detailed further in the viability statement. Further information 
on the assumptions contained in the going concern scenario is 
on page 88. On the basis of this review, and after making due 
enquiries, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the 
Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in 
operational existence for a period of at least 12 months from the 
date of approval of the financial statements. Accordingly, 
they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing 
the Annual Report and financial statements.
Viability statement
The Company’s viability statement is on page 88.
Events after the balance sheet date
In April 2024, the Group exchanged contracts to buy 
The Courtyard, WC1 for £10.4 million of cash and through a 
property exchange of 95/96 New Bond Street for £18.2 million. 
At the reporting date, the acquisition had not yet completed. 
In addition, the Group’s £175.0 million 2.15% private placement 
notes 2024 were repaid on 22 May 2024.
Statement as to disclosure of information  
to the auditor
So far as the Directors who held office at the date of approval 
of this Report of the Directors are aware, there is no relevant audit 
information of which the auditor is unaware and each Director has 
taken all steps that he or she ought to have taken as a Director to 
make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information 
and to establish that the auditor is aware of that information. 
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance 
with the provisions of section 418 of the Companies Act 2006.
By order of the Board
Darren Lennark
General Counsel & Company Secretary
Great Portland Estates plc  
Company number: 596137  
22 May 2024
Governance
145
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Directors’ responsibilities statement
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report 
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable 
law and regulation.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial 
statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors 
have prepared the Group financial statements in accordance 
with UK-adopted international accounting standards and 
the Company financial statements in accordance with 
United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice 
(United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 
“Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and applicable law).
Under company law, the Directors must not approve the 
financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give 
a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and 
Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. 
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are 
required to:
	
– select suitable accounting policies and then apply 
them consistently;
	
– state whether applicable UK-adopted international 
accounting standards have been followed for the group 
financial statements and United Kingdom Accounting 
Standards, comprising FRS 101 have been followed 
for the company financial statements, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and explained in the 
financial statements;
	
– make judgements and accounting estimates that are 
reasonable and prudent; and
	
– prepare the financial statements on the going concern 
basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the group 
and company will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets of 
the Group and Company and hence for taking reasonable 
steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and 
other irregularities.
The Directors are also responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain 
the Group’s and Company’s transactions and disclose with 
reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of 
the Group and Company and enable them to ensure that 
the financial statements and the Directors’ remuneration 
report comply with the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity 
of the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial 
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Directors’ confirmations
The Directors consider that the Annual Report and accounts, 
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable 
and provides the information necessary for shareholders to 
assess the Group’s and Company’s position and performance, 
business model and strategy.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed 
in pages 94 to 95 confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
	
– the Group financial statements, which have been prepared 
in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting 
standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, 
financial position and loss of the Group;
	
– the Company financial statements, which have been 
prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Accounting 
Standards, comprising FRS 101, give a true and fair view 
of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the 
Company; and
	
– the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the 
development and performance of the business and 
the position of the Group and Company, together with 
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties 
that it faces.
This responsibility statement was approved by the Board 
of Directors and is signed on its behalf by:
Toby Courtauld	
Nick Sanderson
Chief Executive	
Chief Financial & Operating Officer  
22 May 2024	
22 May 2024
146
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

In this section:
148
Group income statement
148
Group statement of comprehensive income
149
Group balance sheet
150
Group statement of cash flows
151
Group statement of changes in equity
152
Notes forming part of the 
Group financial statements
179
Independent auditors’ report
187
Company balance sheet
188
Company statement of changes in equity
189
Notes forming part of the 
Company financial statements
Financial 
statements
We are putting health and 
wellbeing front and centre
We are in the age of the conscious consumer. Therefore, it’s more important than 
ever for businesses to consider its customers, as customers will make decisions on 
whom they work for and where they work, based on social and environmental issues. 
A sustainable building should contribute to the wellbeing of our customers and the 
local community, supporting healthier, happier and more productive lives.
Financial statements
147
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes
2024  
£m
2023
£m
Revenue
3
95.4
91.2
Cost of sales
4
(33.3)
(32.2)
62.1
59.0
Administration expenses
5
(42.3)
(38.3)
Expected credit losses
(0.1)
(0.8)
Development management losses
–
(0.1)
Operating profit before deficit from investment property,  
revaluation movements and results of joint ventures
19.7
19.8
Deficit from investment property
10
(267.3)
(145.0)
(Deficit)/surplus on revaluation of other investments
13
(0.2)
0.1
Share of results of joint ventures
11
(46.7)
(33.4)
Operating loss
(294.5)
(158.5)
Finance income
6
6.1
6.0
Finance costs
7
(17.7)
(11.5)
Fair value loss on derivatives
17
(1.7)
–
Loss before tax
(307.8)
(164.0)
Tax
8
–
0.1
Loss for the year
(307.8)
(163.9)
Basic loss per share
9
(121.7p)
(64.8p)
Diluted loss per share
9
(121.7p)
(64.8p)
Basic EPRA earnings per share
9
7.1p
9.5p
Diluted EPRA earnings per share
9
7.1p
9.5p
All results are derived from continuing operations in the UK and are attributable to ordinary equity holders.
Group statement of comprehensive income
For the year ended 31 March 2024
Notes
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Loss for the year
(307.8)
(163.9)
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss
Actuarial gain on defined benefit scheme
26
0.1
0.3
Deferred tax on actuarial gain on defined benefit scheme
8
–
(0.1)
Total comprehensive expense for the year
(307.7)
(163.7)
Group income statement
For the year ended 31 March 2024
148
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Notes
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Non-current assets
Investment property
10
1,911.0
1,922.2
Investment in joint ventures
11
491.3
538.8
Property, plant and equipment
12
2.0
3.5
Pension asset
26
4.9
4.1
Derivative financial instruments
17
0.4
–
Other investments
13
2.4
1.8

2,412.0
2,470.4
Current assets
Trade and other receivables
14
24.9
15.8
Cash and cash equivalents
22
22.9
19.4
47.8
35.2
Current assets held for sale
Investment property held for sale
10
18.2
–
18.2
–
Total assets
2,478.0
2,505.6
Current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings 
16
(175.0)
–
Trade and other payables
15
(76.2)
(56.8)
Corporation tax
8
(0.3)
–
(251.5)
(56.8)
Non-current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
16
(565.4)
(458.5)
Head lease obligations
18
(74.1)
(66.7)
Occupational lease obligations
19
(1.0)
(2.0)
Provisions in respect of warranties on sold buildings
(3.0)
(3.0)
(643.5)
(530.2)
Total liabilities
(895.0)
(587.0)
Net assets
1,583.0
1,918.6
Equity
Share capital
20
38.7
38.7
Share premium account
46.0
46.0
Capital redemption reserve
326.7
326.7
Retained earnings
1,166.0
1,504.4
Investment in own shares
21
5.6
2.8
Total equity
1,583.0
1,918.6
Basic net assets per share (diluted)
9
624p
757p
EPRA NTA (diluted)
9
624p
757p
Approved by the Board on 22 May 2024 and signed on its behalf by:
Toby Courtauld	
	
Nick Sanderson
Chief Executive	
	
Chief Financial & Operating Officer
Group balance sheet
At 31 March 2024
Financial statements
149
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes
2024  
£m
2023 
£m
Operating activities
Operating loss
(294.5)
(158.5)
Adjustments for non-cash items
23
313.4
175.1
(Increase)/decrease in receivables
(8.6)
5.3
Increase/(decrease) in payables
4.1
(6.1)
Cash generated from operations
14.4
15.8
Interest paid
(22.3)
(17.6)
Interest received
0.3
0.1
Cash flows used in operating activities
(7.6)
(1.7)
Investing activities
Distributions from joint ventures
–
7.5
Repayment of loans by joint ventures
6.7
9.0
Investment in joint ventures
(0.1)
–
Purchase of other investments
(0.8)
(0.7)
Development of investment property
(121.7)
(80.5)
Purchase of investment property
(128.3)
(39.9)
Purchase of plant and equipment 
(0.1)
(0.2)
Sale of properties
12.6
217.4
Cash flows (used in)/generated from investing activities
(231.7)
112.6
Financing activities
Revolving credit facility repaid
16
(275.4)
(387.0)
Revolving credit facility drawn
16
308.4
314.0
Term loan drawn
16
248.0
–
Purchase of derivative
17
(2.1)
–
Payment of lease obligations
(3.4)
(3.3)
Dividends paid
24
(32.7)
(31.9)
Cash flows generated from/(used in) financing activities
242.8
(108.2)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
3.5
2.7
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 April
19.4
16.7
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 March
22
22.9
19.4
Group statement of cash flows
For the year ended 31 March 2024
150
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Group statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 March 2024
Notes
Share  
capital  
£m
Share  
premium  
account 
£m
Capital  
redemption  
reserve  
£m
Retained  
earnings  
£m
Investment  
in own  
shares  
£m
Total  
equity  
£m
Total equity at 1 April 2023
38.7
46.0
326.7
1,504.4
2.8
1,918.6
Loss for the year
–
–
–
(307.8)
–
(307.8)
Actuarial gain on defined benefit scheme
26
–
–
–
0.1
–
0.1
Deferred tax on defined benefit scheme
–
–
–
–
–
–
Total comprehensive expense for the year
–
–
–
(307.7)
–
(307.7)
Employee incentive plan charges
21
–
–
–
–
4.0
4.0
Dividends to shareholders
24
–
–
–
(31.9)
–
(31.9)
Transfer to retained earnings
21
–
–
–
1.2
(1.2)
–
Total equity at 31 March 2024
38.7
46.0
326.7
1,166.0
5.6
1,583.0
Notes
Share  
capital  
£m
Share  
premium  
account 
£m
Capital  
redemption  
reserve  
£m
Retained  
earnings  
£m
Investment  
in own  
shares  
£m
Total  
equity  
£m
Total equity at 1 April 2022
38.7
46.0
326.7
1,697.9
3.6
2,112.9
Loss for the year
–
–
–
(163.9)
–
(163.9)
Actuarial gain on defined benefit scheme
26
–
–
–
0.3
–
0.3
Deferred tax on defined benefit scheme
–
–
–
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
Total comprehensive expense for the year
–
–
–
(163.7)
–
(163.7)
Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan charge
21
–
–
–
–
1.3
1.3
Dividends to shareholders
24
–
–
–
(31.9)
–
(31.9)
Transfer to retained earnings
21
–
–
–
2.1
(2.1)
–
Total equity at 31 March 2023
38.7
46.0
326.7
1,504.4
2.8
1,918.6
Group statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 March 2023
Financial statements
151
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements
1 Material accounting policies
Basis of preparation
Great Portland Estates plc is a public company limited by 
shares incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom 
(England and Wales). The address of the registered office 
is given on page 202. The financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with United Kingdom adopted 
international accounting standards and the requirements 
of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies 
reporting under those standards.
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical 
cost basis, except for the revaluation of properties and 
certain financial instruments which are held at fair value. 
The consolidated financial statements, including the results 
and financial position, are expressed in sterling (£), which is 
the presentation currency of the Group.
The Directors have considered the appropriateness of 
adopting the going concern basis in preparing the financial 
statements for the year ended 31 March 2024, with particular 
focus on the impact of the macro-economic conditions in 
which the Group is operating. The Directors also considered 
the Group’s net current liability position as at 31 March 2024, 
which is primarily driven by the maturity in May 2024 of a 
£175 million private placement note (see note 16). The Directors’ 
assessment is based on the next 12 months of the Group’s 
financial forecasts from the date of approval of the annual 
report, including a going concern scenario which included 
the following key assumptions:
	
– a 14% decline in the valuation of the property portfolio; and
	
– a 35% decline in earnings before interest and tax.
The going concern scenario did not include the proceeds 
of the intended rights issue and demonstrates that the 
Group over the next 12 months:
	
– has sufficient liquidity to fund its ongoing operations;
	
– is operating with significant headroom above its Group 
debt financing covenants;
	
– property values would have to fall by 18% before breach 
(or 34% from 31 March 2024 values);
	
– earnings before interest and tax would need to fall by 42% 
before breach (or 63% from 31 March 2024 levels); and
	
– has sufficient liquidity to continue its operations on repayment 
of the Group’s £175 million private placement notes, that 
mature in May 2024, as were repaid on 22 May 2024.
The Directors also conducted extensive stress testing, sensitising 
the potential impact of climate change as detailed further 
in the viability statement as well as the impact of removing 
non-committed disposal proceeds and capital expenditure. 
Based on these considerations, together with available market 
information and the Directors’ knowledge and experience of 
the Group’s property portfolio and markets, the Directors have 
adopted the going concern basis in preparing the accounts 
for the year ended 31 March 2024. The Group has adopted 
a number of alternative performance measures, see note 9 
for further detail.
Critical accounting judgements and key sources 
of estimation uncertainty
In the process of preparing the financial statements, the 
Directors are required to make certain judgements, assumptions 
and estimates. Not all of the Group’s accounting policies 
require the Directors to make difficult, subjective or complex 
judgements or estimates. Any estimates and judgements made 
are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience 
and other factors, including expectations of future events 
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. 
Although these estimates are based on the Directors’ best 
knowledge of the amount, event or actions, actual results 
may differ from those estimates.
No critical judgements have been made.
The following is intended to provide an understanding of 
the estimates that management consider critical because 
of the level of complexity, judgement or estimation involved 
in their application and their material impact on the 
financial statements.
Key source of estimation uncertainty:  
investment property portfolio valuation
The valuation to determine the fair value of the Group’s 
investment properties is prepared by its external valuer. 
The valuation is based upon a number of assumptions and 
estimations, including future rental income, anticipated 
capital expenditure, including future development costs and 
an appropriate discount rate. The valuer also makes reference 
to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties. 
Information about the valuation techniques, significant 
assumptions and associated key unobservable inputs 
sensitivity disclosures are disclosed in note 10. An adjustment 
to any of these assumptions could lead to a material change 
in the property valuation. For the current year and prior year, 
the Directors adopted the valuation without adjustment 
– further information is provided in the accounting policy 
for investment property and note 10.
New accounting standards
In the current year, the Group has applied a number of 
amendments to IFRSs that are mandatorily effective for an 
accounting period that begins on or after 1 January 2024. 
Their adoption has not had any material impact on the 
disclosures or on the amounts reported in these financial 
statements. These new standards and amendments are 
listed below:
	
– IFRS 17 – Insurance contracts;
	
– Disclosure of accounting policies amendments to IAS 1 
and IFRS Practice Statement 2;
	
– Amendments to IAS 8 – Accounting policies – definition 
of accounting estimates;
	
– Amendments to IAS 12 – Income taxes – deferred tax 
relating to assets and liabilities arising from a single 
transaction; and
	
– OECD Pillar Two Rules (out of scope).
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, 
the Group has not applied the following new and revised 
IFRSs that have been issued but are not yet effective:
152
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

1 Material accounting policies continued
	
– Amendments to IAS 1 – Presentation of financial 
statements – classification of liabilities as current or  
non-current and non-current liabilities with covenants;
	
– Amendments to IFRS 16 – Leases – lease liability in a sale 
and leaseback;
	
– IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements;
	
– Amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7 – supplier finance 
arrangements; and
	
– Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 – sale or contribution 
of assets between an investor and its associate or 
joint venture.
The Directors do not expect that the adoption of the standards 
listed above will have a material impact on the financial 
statements of the Group in future periods, with the exception of 
IFRS 18, where the Directors are assessing its potential impact.
Basis of consolidation
The Group’s financial statements consolidate the financial 
statements of the Company and all its subsidiary undertakings 
for the year ended 31 March 2024. Subsidiary undertakings 
are those entities controlled by the Group. Control exists 
when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable 
returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability 
to affect those returns through its power over the investee.
Revenue
Gross rental income comprises rental income and premiums 
on lease surrenders on investment properties for the year, 
exclusive of service charges receivable, on a straight-line 
basis. Initial direct costs incurred in arranging a lease are 
added to the carrying value of investment properties and 
are subsequently recognised as an expense over the lease 
term on the same basis as the lease income.
Lease incentives, including rent-free periods and payments 
to customers, are allocated to the income statement on 
a straight-line basis over the lease term or on another 
systematic basis, if applicable. The value of resulting accrued 
rental income is included within the respective property, 
with the aggregate cost of the incentive recognised as 
a reduction in rental income on a straight-line basis over 
the term of the lease.
Revenue from Fully Managed spaces is split between an 
amount attributable to the rent on a fitted basis and services 
income as set out in the lease agreement, which is based 
on stand-alone selling prices. Where the lease agreement 
does not provide an attribution, the Group splits the revenue 
based on the ERV of the fitted rent, which represents the 
stand-alone selling price. The rent is recognised in gross rental 
income (see above) and the services income is recorded 
over the period when the services are provided and benefit 
the customer. 
The Group’s Flex Partnerships represent leases with third-party 
operators where the rent payable is calculated by reference 
to the profitability of the space under management. The rent 
is recognised in gross rental income (see above).
Service charge income is recorded over the period when 
the services are provided and benefit the customer.
Cost of sales
Service charge expenses represent the costs of operating 
the Group’s portfolio and are expensed as incurred.
Fully Managed service costs represent the costs of operating 
the Group’s Fully Managed spaces and are expensed as incurred.
Other property expenses represent irrecoverable running 
costs directly attributable to specific properties within 
the Group’s portfolio. Costs incurred in the improvement 
of the portfolio which, in the opinion of the Directors, 
are not of a capital nature are written-off to the income 
statement as incurred.
Administration expenses
Costs not directly attributable to individual properties 
are treated as administration expenses.
Share-based payments
The cost of granting share-based payments to employees 
and Directors is recognised within administration expenses 
in the income statement. The Group has used the stochastic 
model to fair value LTIP grants, which is dependent upon 
factors including the share price, expected volatility and 
vesting period. The fair value of the RSP is based on the share 
price at grant date. The resulting fair value is amortised 
through the income statement over the vesting period. 
The charge is recognised over the vesting period and reversed 
if it is likely that any non-market-based performance or service 
criteria will not be met. Any cost in respect of share-based 
payments relating to the employees of a subsidiary company 
is recharged accordingly.
Investment property
Both leasehold and freehold investment properties and 
investment properties under development are professionally 
valued on a fair value basis by qualified external valuers 
and the Directors must ensure that they are satisfied that 
the valuation of the Group’s properties is appropriate for 
inclusion in the accounts without adjustment. The valuation 
of the property portfolio reflects its fair value taking into 
account the market view of all relevant factors, including 
the climate-related risks associated with the properties. 
This includes the impact of expected regulatory changes.
The valuations have been prepared in accordance with the 
current versions of the RICS Valuation – Global Standards 
(incorporating the International Valuation Standards (IVS)) 
and the UK national supplement (the Red Book) and have 
been primarily derived using comparable recent market 
transactions on arm’s length terms.
For investment property, this approach involves applying 
market-derived capitalisation yields to current and market-
derived future income streams with appropriate adjustments 
for income voids arising from vacancies or rent-free periods.
These capitalisation yields and future income streams are 
derived from comparable property and leasing transactions 
and are considered to be the key inputs in the valuation. 
Other factors that are taken into account in the valuations 
include the tenure of the property, tenancy details, non-payment 
of rent, planning, building and environmental factors that 
might affect the property.
Financial statements
153
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
1 Material accounting policies continued
An investment property will be classified as held for sale where 
it is available for immediate sale in its present condition and 
the sale is highly probable.
In the case of investment property under development, the 
approach applied is the ‘residual method’ of valuation, which is 
the investment method of valuation as described above with a 
deduction for the costs necessary to complete the development, 
together with an allowance for the remaining risk.
The Group recognises sales and purchases of property when 
control passes on completion of the contract. Gains or losses 
on the sale of properties are calculated by reference to the 
carrying value at the end of the previous year, adjusted  
for subsequent capital expenditure.
Lease obligations
Where the Group is a lessee, a right of use asset and lease 
liability are recognised at the outset of the lease. The lease 
liability is initially measured at the present value of the 
lease payments based on the Group’s expectations of the 
likelihood of the lease term. The lease liability is subsequently 
adjusted to reflect an imputed finance charge, payments 
made to the lessor and any lease modifications.
The right of use asset is initially measured at cost, which 
comprises the amount of the lease liability and direct costs 
incurred, less any lease incentives received by the Group. 
The Group has two categories of right of use assets: those 
in respect of head leases related to its leasehold properties and 
an occupational lease for its head office. The right of use asset 
in respect of head leases is classified as investment property 
and is added to the carrying value of the leasehold investment 
property. The right of use asset in respect of its occupational 
leases is classified as property, plant and equipment and is 
subsequently depreciated over the length of the lease.
Depreciation
No depreciation is provided in respect of freehold investment 
properties and leasehold investment properties. Plant and 
equipment is held at cost less accumulated depreciation. 
Depreciation is provided on plant and equipment, at rates 
calculated to write off the cost, less residual value prevailing 
at the balance sheet date of each asset evenly over its 
expected useful life, as follows:
Fixtures and fittings – over three to five years.
Leasehold improvements – over the term of the lease.
Joint ventures
Joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method 
where, in the Directors’ judgement, the Group has joint 
control of the entity. The Group’s level of control in its joint 
ventures is driven both by the individual agreements which 
set out how control is shared by the partners and how that 
control is exercised in practice. The Group balance sheet 
contains the Group’s share of the net assets of its joint 
ventures. Balances with partners owed to or from the Group 
by joint ventures are included within investments. The Group’s 
share of joint venture profits and losses are included in the 
Group income statement in a single line. All of the Group’s 
joint ventures adopt the accounting policies of the Group 
for inclusion in the Group financial statements. There have 
been no new joint ventures during the year and no changes 
to any of the agreements in place.
Income tax
Current tax is the amount payable on the taxable income 
for the year and any adjustment in respect of previous years. 
Deferred tax is provided in full on temporary differences between 
the tax base of an asset or liability and its carrying amount in the 
balance sheet. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates that 
have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance 
sheet date and are expected to apply when the asset is realised 
or the liability is settled. Deferred tax assets are recognised when 
it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which 
the deferred tax assets can be utilised. No provision is made 
for temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of 
assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable 
profit, with the exception of leases. Tax is included in the 
income statement except when it relates to items recognised 
directly in other comprehensive income or equity, in which 
case the related tax is also recognised directly in other 
comprehensive income or equity.
Pension benefits
The Group contributes to a defined benefit pension plan which 
is funded with assets held separately from those of the Group. 
The full value of the net assets or liabilities of the pension fund 
is brought onto the balance sheet at each balance sheet date. 
Actuarial gains and losses are taken to other comprehensive 
income; all other movements are taken to the income statement.
Capitalisation of interest
Interest associated with direct expenditure on investment and 
trading properties under development and refurbishment is 
capitalised. Direct expenditure includes the purchase cost 
of a site if it has been purchased with the specific intention 
to redevelop, but does not include the original book cost of 
a site where no intention existed. Interest is capitalised from 
the start of the development work until the date of practical 
completion. The rate used is the Group’s weighted average 
cost of borrowings or, if appropriate, the rate on specific 
associated borrowings.
Other investments
Other investments comprise investments in Pi Labs European 
PropTech venture capital fund, which is measured at fair value, 
based on the net assets of the fund; this is a Level 3 valuation 
as defined by IFRS 13. Changes in fair value are recognised 
in profit or loss.
Financial instruments
i Borrowings The Group’s borrowings in the form of its 
debentures, private placement notes and bank loans are 
recognised initially at fair value, after taking account of any 
discount or premium on issue and attributable transaction 
costs. Subsequently, borrowings are held at amortised 
cost, with any discounts, premiums and attributable costs 
charged to the income statement using the effective 
interest rate method.
ii Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents 
comprise cash in hand, demand deposits and other short-term 
highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into a 
known amount of cash and are subject to insignificant risk  
of changes in value. 
154
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

1 Material accounting policies continued
iii Trade receivables and payables Trade receivables 
are initially measured at the transaction price, and are 
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective 
interest rate method. See note 14 for further information 
on trade receivables and associated expected credit losses. 
Trade payables are initially measured at fair value and 
subsequently measured at amortised cost.
iv Derivative financial instruments The Group uses derivatives 
(principally interest rate caps) in managing interest rate risk, 
and does not use them for trading. They are recorded, and 
subsequently revalued, at fair value, with revaluation gains 
or losses being immediately taken to the income statement. 
Derivatives with a maturity of less than 12 months or that expect 
to be settled within 12 months of the balance sheet date are 
presented as current assets or liabilities. Other derivatives 
are presented as non-current assets or liabilities.
2. Segmental analysis
IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires the identification of operating segments based on internal financial reports detailing 
components of the Group regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision makers (the Group’s Executive Committee) in order 
to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance.
In recent years, the Group has evolved the types of office space it provides to its customers. This has included a Fully Managed 
offer with additional service provision. As this element of the Group’s business has grown, so has the level of financial information 
and oversight. As a result, the Directors have concluded that, based on the level of information provided to the Executive 
Committee, for the current year this element of the business is an operating segment as defined by IFRS 8. Furthermore, given the 
revenue for the current financial year is in excess of 10% of wider Group revenue, the segment should be separately reported from 
the remainder of the Group’s activities. The Executive Committee reviews the performance of its Fully Managed offer based on 
gross revenue (including Fully Managed services income) net of cost of sales on a proportionally consolidated basis (including the 
Group’s joint ventures at share). The cost of sales information is not available for the prior year due to the information not being 
available and the cost to develop it would be excessive. Total assets and liabilities are not monitored by segment.
The remainder of the Group’s components are managed together, with their operating results reviewed on an aggregated basis. 
All of the Group’s revenue is generated from investment properties located in a small radius within central London. The properties 
are managed as a single portfolio by a portfolio management team whose responsibilities are not segregated by location or 
type, but are managed on an asset-by-asset basis. The majority of the Group’s assets are mixed-use, therefore the office, retail 
and any residential space is managed together. The Directors have considered the nature of the business, how the business is 
managed and how they review performance, and in their judgement, the Group has only two reportable segments.
Segmental analysis for the year ended 31 March 2024
Fully Managed 
offices including 
joint ventures
£m
Joint  
ventures
£m
Group Fully 
Managed 
offices
£m
Remainder  
of portfolio
£m
Total
2024
£m
Total
 2023
 £m
Revenue
13.6
(1.4)
12.2
83.2
95.4
91.2
Cost of sales
(8.6)
0.5
(8.1)
(25.2)
(33.3)
n/a
Net result
5.0
(0.9)
4.1
58.0
62.1
n/a
Revenue for the Group’s Fully Managed offices in the year to 31 March 2023 was £7.8 million (£8.0 million including share of joint ventures).
3 Revenue
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Gross rental income
67.2
66.6
Spreading of lease incentives
5.7
5.9
Service charge income
14.4
12.5
Fully Managed services income
6.4
3.7
Trading property revenue
–
0.1
Joint venture fee income
1.7
2.4
95.4
91.2
Financial statements
155
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
3 Revenue continued
The table below sets out the Group’s gross rental income split between types of space provided:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Ready to Fit
37.9
42.4
Retail
10.5
11.1
Fitted
6.8
3.8
Fully Managed
5.8
4.1
Flex Partnerships
3.8
3.2
Hotel
2.4
2.0
67.2
66.6
The table below sets out the Group’s net rental income, which is an alternative performance measure:
2024  
£m
2023 
£m
Gross rental income
67.2
66.6
Expected credit loss
(0.2)
(0.6)
Rental income
67.0
66.0
Spreading of lease incentives
5.7
5.9
Ground rent
(0.6)
(1.0)
Net rental income
72.1
70.9
4 Cost of sales
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Service charge expenses (including Fully Managed service costs – see note 2)
25.8
19.3
Other property expenses
6.9
11.9
Ground rent
0.6
1.0
33.3
32.2
For the year ended 31 March 2024, the Fully Managed service costs comprised £8.1 million of the £25.8 million service charge 
expenses (see note 2).
The table below sets out the Group’s property costs, which is an alternative performance measure:
2024  
£m
2023 
£m
Service charge income
(14.4)
(12.5)
Fully Managed services income
(6.4)
(3.7)
Service charge expenses (including Fully Managed service costs)
25.8
19.3
Other property expenses
6.9
11.9
Expected credit (recovery)/loss
(0.1)
0.2
Property costs
11.8
15.2
5 Administration expenses
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Employee costs
30.9
26.3
Depreciation (see note 12)
1.6
1.7
Other head office costs
9.8
10.3
42.3
38.3
156
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

5 Administration expenses continued
Included within employee costs is an accounting charge for the Employee Long Term Incentive Plan and deferred bonus shares 
of £4.0 million (2023: £1.3 million). Employee costs, including those of Directors, comprise the following:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Wages and salaries (including annual bonuses)
24.4
22.4
Share-based payments
4.1
1.5
Social security costs
3.7
3.4
Other pension costs
2.4
2.3
34.6
29.6
Less: recovered through service charges
(1.9)
(2.0)
Less: capitalised into development projects
(1.8)
(1.3)
30.9
26.3
Key management compensation
The emoluments and pension benefits of the Directors are set out in detail within the Directors’ remuneration report on 
pages 124 to 143. The Directors and the Executive Committee are considered to be key management for the purposes of IAS 24 – 
Related Party Transactions with their aggregate compensation set out below:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Wages and salaries (including annual bonuses)
6.8
6.8
Share-based payments
1.9
0.3
Social security costs
1.1
1.0
Other pension costs
0.5
0.5
10.3
8.6
The number of people considered key management totalled 17 (2023: 18). The Group had loans to key management of £2,880 
(2023: £17,882) outstanding at 31 March 2024. The Group’s key management, its pension plan and joint ventures are the Group’s 
only related parties.
Employee information
The monthly average number of employees of the Group, including Directors, was:
2024  
Number
2023  
Number
Head office and property management
150
145
Auditor’s remuneration
2024  
£000
2023  
£000
Audit of the Group and Company’s annual accounts
394
242
Audit of subsidiaries
107
94
501
336
Audit-related assurance services, including the interim review
61
49
Sustainability assurance
68
63
Auditor’s remuneration
630
448
For the year ended 31 March 2024, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was appointed as auditor to the Group, succeeding Deloitte LLP.
Financial statements
157
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
6 Finance income
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Interest income on joint ventures balances
5.8
5.9
Interest on cash deposits
0.3
0.1
6.1
6.0
7 Finance costs
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Interest on revolving credit facilities
5.8
5.7
Interest on term loan
8.5
–
Interest on private placement notes
11.0
10.9
Interest on debenture stock
1.2
1.2
Interest on obligations under occupational leases
–
0.1
Interest on obligations under head leases
2.4
2.4
Other
0.1
–
Gross finance costs
29.0
20.3
Less: capitalised interest 
(11.3)
(8.8)
17.7
11.5
The Group capitalised interest on certain developments with specific associated borrowings at 6.8% (2023: nil), with the remainder 
at the Group’s weighted average cost of non-specific borrowings of 3.5% (2023: 3.0%).
8 Tax
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Current tax
UK corporation tax – current period
–
–
UK corporation tax – prior periods
–
–
Total current tax
–
–
Deferred tax
–
(0.1)
Tax credit for the year
–
(0.1)
The effective rate of tax is lower (2023: lower) than the standard rate of tax. The difference arises from the items set out below:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Loss before tax
(307.8)
(164.0)
Tax credit on loss at standard rate of 25% (2023: 19%)
(77.0)
(31.2)
REIT tax exempt rental profits and gains
(7.4)
(7.1)
Changes in fair value of properties not subject to tax
80.5
35.1
Difference between accounting profit and tax profit on disposal
–
2.0
Other
3.9
1.1
Tax credit for the year
–
(0.1)
During the year, £nil million (2023: £0.1 million) of deferred tax was debited directly to equity. The Group recognised a net 
deferred tax asset at 31 March 2024 of £nil (2023: £nil). This consists of deferred tax assets of £1.6 million (2023: £1.2 million) 
and deferred tax liabilities of £1.6 million (2023: £1.2 million).
158
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

8 Tax continued
Deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. 
The standard rate of tax increased on 1 April 2023 from 19% to 25%.
Movement in deferred tax
At 1 April  
2023  
£m
Recognised  
in the income 
statement  
£m
Recognised  
in equity  
£m
At 31 March 
2024  
£m
Net deferred tax asset/(liability) in respect of other temporary differences
–
–
–
–
The Group has not recognised further deferred tax assets in respect of gross temporary differences arising from the following 
items, because it is uncertain whether future taxable profits will arise against which these assets can be utilised:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Revenue losses
24.6
15.7
Share-based payments
8.4
10.5
Other
1.3
1.4
34.3
27.6
As a REIT, the majority of rental profits and chargeable gains from the Group’s property rental business are exempt from UK 
corporation tax. The Group is otherwise subject to corporation tax. In particular, the Group’s REIT exemption does not extend 
to either profits arising from the sale of trading properties or gains arising from the sale of investment properties in respect 
of which a major redevelopment has completed within the preceding three years (including the sale of 50 Finsbury Square, EC2, 
which completed in February 2023).
In order to ensure that the Group is able to both retain its status as a REIT and avoid financial charges being imposed, a number 
of tests (including a minimum distribution test) must be met by both Great Portland Estates plc and by the Group as a whole on 
an ongoing basis. These conditions are detailed in the Corporation Tax Act 2010.
9 Alternative performance measures and EPRA metrics
As is usual practice in our sector, we use alternative performance measures (APMs) to help explain the performance of the business. 
These include quoting a number of measures on a proportionally consolidated basis to include joint ventures, as it best describes 
how we manage the portfolio, and using measures prescribed by the European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA). The measures 
defined by EPRA are designed to enhance transparency and comparability across the European real estate sector in accordance 
with its Best Practice Recommendations. The Directors consider these EPRA metrics, and the other metrics provided, to be 
the most appropriate method of reporting the value and performance of the business. A summary of our EPRA measures is 
on page 33. EPRA capital expenditure and EPRA NIY are included in note 10 and EPRA vacancy is set out on page 197.
Earnings per share
Weighted average number of ordinary shares
2024  
Number of  
shares
2023  
Number of  
shares
Issued ordinary share capital at 1 April
253,867,911
253,867,911
Investment in own shares
(887,159)
(941,432)
Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 31 March – basic
252,980,752
252,926,479
Basic and diluted earnings per share
Loss  
after tax  
2024  
£m
Number  
of shares  
2024  
million
Loss  
per share  
2024  
pence
Loss  
after tax  
2023  
£m
Number  
of shares  
2023  
million
Loss  
per share  
2023  
pence
Basic
(307.8)
253.0
(121.7)
(163.9)
252.9
(64.8)
Dilutive effect of LTIP shares
–
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted
(307.8)
253.0
(121.7)
(163.9)
252.9
(64.8)
Financial statements
159
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
9 Alternative performance measures and EPRA metrics continued 
Basic and diluted EPRA earnings per share
 
(Loss)/
Earnings  
after tax  
2024  
£m
Number  
of shares  
2024  
million
(Loss)/
Earnings 
per share  
2024  
pence
 
(Loss)/
Earnings  
after tax  
2023  
£m
Number  
of shares  
2023  
million
(Loss)/
Earnings 
per share  
2023  
pence
Basic
(307.8)
253.0
(121.7)
(163.9)
252.9
(64.8)
Deficit from investment property net of tax (note 10)
267.3
–
105.7
145.0
–
57.3
Deficit from joint venture investment property (note 11)
56.5
–
22.3
43.2
–
17.1
Trading property revenue
–
–
–
(0.1)
–
–
Deficit on revaluation of derivatives
1.7
–
0.7
–
–
–
Deficit/(surplus) on revaluation of other investments (note 13)
0.2
–
0.1
(0.1)
–
–
Deferred tax in respect of adjustments (note 8)
–
–
–
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
Basic EPRA earnings
17.9
253.0
7.1
24.0
252.9
9.5
Dilutive effect of LTIP shares (note 21)
–
0.2
–
–
0.2
–
Diluted EPRA earnings
17.9
253.2
7.1
24.0
253.1
9.5
Net assets per share
The Group has adopted EPRA’s Best Practice Recommendations for Net Asset Value (NAV) metrics. The recommendations include 
three NAV metrics: EPRA Net Tangible Assets (NTA), Net Reinvestment Value (NRV) and Net Disposal Value (NDV). We consider 
EPRA NTA to be the most relevant measure for the Group and the primary measure of IFRS net asset value, definitions are 
included in the glossary.
Number of ordinary shares
2024  
Number of  
shares
2023  
Number of  
shares
Issued ordinary share capital
253,867,911
253,867,911
Investment in own shares
(887,159)
(887,159)
Number of shares – basic
252,980,752
252,980,752
Dilutive effect of LTIP shares
563,956
326,340
Number of shares – diluted
253,544,708
253,307,092
EPRA net assets per share at 31 March 2024
IFRS  
£m
EPRA  
NTA  
£m
EPRA  
NDV  
£m
EPRA  
NRV  
£m
IFRS basic and diluted net assets
1,583.0
1,583.0
1,583.0
1,583.0
Fair value of derivative financial instruments
–
(0.4)
–
(0.4)
Fair value of financial liabilities (note 17)
–
–
50.7
–
Real estate transfer tax
–
–
–
170.1
Net assets used in per share calculations
1,583.0
1,582.6
1,633.7 
1,752.7
IFRS 
EPRA  
NTA 
EPRA  
NDV 
EPRA  
NRV 
Net assets per share (pence)
626
626
646
693
Diluted net assets per share (pence)
624
624
644
691
160
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

9 Alternative performance measures and EPRA metrics continued 
EPRA net assets per share at 31 March 2023
IFRS  
£m
EPRA  
NTA  
£m
EPRA  
NDV  
£m
EPRA  
NRV  
£m
IFRS basic and diluted net assets
1,918.6
1,918.6
1,918.6
1,918.6
Fair value of financial liabilities (note 17)
–
–
83.4
–
Real estate transfer tax
–
–
–
173.6
Net assets used in per share calculations
1,918.6
1,918.6
2,002.0
2,092.2
IFRS 
EPRA  
NTA 
EPRA  
NDV 
EPRA  
NRV 
Net assets per share (pence)
758
758
791
827
Diluted net assets per share (pence)
757
757
790
826
Total Accounting Return (TAR)
2024  
Pence per  
share
2023  
Pence per  
share 
Opening EPRA NTA (A)
757.0
835.0
Closing EPRA NTA 
624.0
757.0
Decrease in EPRA NTA
(133.0)
(78.0)
Ordinary dividends paid in the year
12.6
12.6
Total return (B)
(120.4)
(65.4)
Total Accounting Return (B/A)
(15.9%)
(7.8%)
EPRA loan-to-property value and net debt
We consider loan-to-property value, including our share of joint ventures, to be the best measure of the Group’s risk 
from financial leverage. We also present net gearing as it is a key covenant on our loan facilities (see note 16).
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
£21.9 million 55⁄8% debenture stock 2029
21.9
21.9
£450.0 million revolving credit facility
47.0
14.0
£250.0 million term loan
250.0
–
Private placement notes
425.0
425.0
Less: cash and cash equivalents
(22.9)
(19.4)
Group net debt
721.0
441.5
Net payables (including customer rent deposits)
54.6
44.0
Group net debt including net payables
775.6
485.5
Joint venture net payables (at share)
10.5
3.4
Less: joint venture cash and cash equivalents (at share)
(25.7)
(17.7)
Net debt including joint ventures (A)
760.4
471.2
Group properties at market value 
1,855.1
1,855.5
Joint venture properties at market value (at share)
476.1
524.5
Property portfolio at market value including joint ventures (B)
2,331.2
2,380.0
EPRA loan-to-property value (A/B)
32.6%
19.8%
Group cash and cash equivalents includes customer rent deposits (as restated) held in separate designated bank accounts 
of £17.0 million (2023: £16.2 million), the use of the deposits is subject to restrictions as set out in the customer’s lease agreement 
and therefore not available for general use by the Group.
Financial statements
161
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
9 Alternative performance measures and EPRA metrics continued
EPRA cost ratio (including share of joint ventures)
2024 
£m
2023
£m
Administration expenses
42.3
38.3
Net property costs (excluding Fully Managed services income and costs1)
10.1
15.2
Joint venture management fee income (note 3)
(1.7)
(2.4)
Joint venture property and administration costs (note 11)
3.6
2.2
EPRA costs (including direct vacancy costs) (A)
54.3
53.3
Direct vacancy costs
(5.1)
(7.8)
Joint venture direct vacancy cost
(2.2)
(0.3)
EPRA costs (excluding direct vacancy costs) (B)
47.0
45.2
Net rental income (note 3)
72.1
70.9
Joint venture net rental income (note 11)
19.4
18.2
Gross rental income (C)
91.5
89.1
Portfolio at fair value including joint ventures (D)
2,331.2
2,380.0
Cost ratio (including direct vacancy costs) (A/C)
59.3%
59.8%
Cost ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs) (B/C)
51.4%
50.7%
Cost ratio (by portfolio value) (A/D)
2.3%
2.2%
1. For 2024 only, the information is not available for the prior year see note 2.
Net gearing
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Nominal value of interest-bearing loans and borrowings (see note 16)
743.9
460.9
Obligations under occupational leases
1.0
2.0
Less: cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted) (see note 22)
(5.9)
(3.2)
Adjusted net debt (A)
739.0
459.7
Net assets
1,583.0
1,918.6
Pension scheme asset
(4.9)
(4.1)
Adjusted net equity (B)
1,578.1
1,914.5
Net gearing (A/B)
46.8%
24.0%
Cash earnings per share
Profit  
after tax  
2024  
£m
Number  
of shares  
2024  
million
Earnings  
per share  
2024  
pence
Profit  
after tax  
2023  
£m
Number  
of shares  
2023  
million
Earnings  
per share  
2023  
pence
Diluted EPRA earnings
17.9
253.2
7.1
24.0
253.1
9.5
Capitalised interest
(11.3)
–
(4.5)
(8.8)
–
(3.5)
Spreading of lease incentives
(5.7)
–
(2.3)
(5.9)
–
(2.3)
Spreading of lease incentives in joint ventures
(1.4)
–
(0.5)
(7.0)
–
(2.8)
Employee incentive plan charges
4.0
–
1.6
1.3
–
0.5
Cash earnings per share
3.5
253.2
1.4
3.6
253.1
1.4
162
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

10 Investment property
Investment property
Freehold
£m
Leasehold
£m
Total
£m
Book value at 1 April 2022
929.6
1,047.2
1,976.8
Costs capitalised
17.6
11.2
28.8
Movement in lease incentives
4.8
1.1
5.9
Acquisitions
7.5
36.1
43.6
Disposals
(27.3)
–
(27.3)
Transfer to investment property under development
–
(101.2)
(101.2)
Net valuation deficit on investment property
(48.7)
(69.4)
(118.1)
Book value at 31 March 2023
883.5
925.0
1,808.5
Costs capitalised
28.0
57.3
85.3
Movement in lease incentives
7.8
(0.4)
7.4
Interest capitalised
2.2
2.6
4.8
Acquisitions
128.3
–
128.3
Disposals
(5.8)
(8.4)
(14.2)
Transfer to investment property under development
(50.1)
(59.6)
(109.7)
Transfer to investment property held for sale
–
(18.2)
(18.2)
Net valuation deficit on investment property
(108.8)
(106.0)
(214.8)
Book value at 31 March 2024 (A)
885.1
792.3
1,677.4
Investment property under development
Freehold  
£m
Leasehold  
£m
Total  
£m
Book value at 1 April 2022
167.6
–
167.6
Costs capitalised
21.1
32.0
53.1
Disposals
(193.4)
–
(193.4)
Interest capitalised
4.7
4.1
8.8
Transfer from investment property
–
101.2
101.2
Net valuation deficit on investment property under development
–
(23.6)
(23.6)
Book value at 31 March 2023
–
113.7
113.7
Costs capitalised
–
54.6
54.6
Interest capitalised
–
6.5
6.5
Transfer from investment property
50.1
59.6
109.7
Net valuation deficit on investment property under development
–
(50.9)
(50.9)
Book value at 31 March 2024 (B)
50.1
183.5
233.6
Book value of investment property & investment property under development (A+B)
935.2
975.8
1,911.0
Investment property held for sale
Freehold  
£m
Leasehold  
£m
Total  
£m
Book value at 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2023
–
–
–
Transfer from investment property – held for sale
–
18.2
18.2
Book value of investment property held for sale at 31 March 2024 (C)
–
18.2
18.2
Book value of total investment property at 31 March 2024 (A+B+C)
935.2
994.0
1,929.2
The book value of investment property includes £74.1 million (2023: £66.7 million) in respect of the present value of future 
ground rents. The market value of the portfolio (excluding these amounts) is £1,855.1 million. The total portfolio value 
including joint venture properties of £476.1 million (see note 11) was £2,331.2 million. At 31 March 2024, property with a 
carrying value of £107.0 million (2023: £111.0 million) was secured under the first mortgage debenture stock (see note 16). 
At the balance sheet date, one property had exchanged for sale and accordingly was classified as held for sale. The sale 
is anticipated to complete in January 2025.
Financial statements
163
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
10 Investment property continued
Surplus from investment property
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Net valuation deficit on investment property
(265.7)
(141.7)
Loss on sale of investment properties
(1.6)
(3.3)
(267.3)
(145.0)
The Group’s investment properties, including those held in joint ventures (note 11), were valued on the basis of fair value by 
CBRE Limited (CBRE), external valuers, as at 31 March 2024. The valuations have been prepared in accordance with the current 
versions of the RICS Valuation – Global Standards (incorporating the International Valuation Standards (IVS)) and the UK 
national supplement (the Red Book) and have been primarily derived using comparable recent market transactions on arm’s 
length terms.
The total fees, including the fixed fee for this assignment, earned by CBRE (or other companies forming part of the same group of 
companies within the UK) from the Group are less than 5.0% of its total UK revenues. CBRE has carried out valuation instructions, 
agency and professional services on behalf of the Group for in excess of 20 years.
Real estate valuations are complex and derived using comparable market transactions which are not publicly available 
and involve an element of judgement. Therefore, we have classified the valuation of the property portfolio as Level 3 as defined 
by IFRS 13; this is in line with EPRA guidance. There were no transfers between levels during the year. Inputs to the valuation, 
including capitalisation yields (typically the true equivalent yield) and rental values, are defined as ‘unobservable’ as defined 
by IFRS 13.
Everything else being equal, there is a positive relationship between rental values and the property valuation, such that an 
increase in rental values will increase the valuation of a property and a decrease in rental values will reduce the valuation of the 
property. Any percentage movement in rental values will translate into approximately the same percentage movement in the 
property valuation. However, due to the long-term nature of leases, where the passing rent is fixed and often subject to upwards 
only rent reviews, the impact will not be immediate and will be recognised over a number of years. The relationship between 
capitalisation yields and the property valuation is negative and more immediate; therefore, an increase in capitalisation yields 
will reduce the valuation of a property and a reduction will increase its valuation. There is a negative relationship between 
development costs and the property valuation, such that an increase in estimated development costs will decrease the valuation 
of a property under development and a decrease in estimated development costs will increase the valuation of a property 
under development. 
An increase of 10% on the capital expenditure on the Group’s three HQ development schemes and four Flex conversion schemes, 
which the Directors believe is a reasonable variance to budgeted cost based on industry experience, would reduce the valuation 
by £49.8 million, with a decrease of 10% increasing the valuation by £49.8 million.
A decrease in the capitalisation yield by 50 basis points would result in an increase in the fair value of the Group’s investment 
property by £203.2 million (£241.4 million including a share of joint ventures), whilst a 50 basis point increase would reduce the 
fair value by £166.7 million (£200.0 million including a share of joint ventures). A movement of 56 basis points was shown across 
the portfolio over the last 12 months and a 50 basis point movement is therefore considered to be a reasonably possible change. 
Given there is only a marginal difference in the overall yields for office and retail and the movement in year, we feel this sensitivity 
to be appropriate. There are interrelationships between these inputs as they are determined by market conditions, and the 
valuation movement in any one period depends on the balance between them. If these inputs move in opposite directions 
(i.e. rental values increase and yields decrease), valuation movements can be amplified, whereas if they move in the same 
direction, they may offset, reducing the overall net valuation movement.
The valuation of the property portfolio reflects its fair value taking into account the climate related risks associated with 
the properties. This includes the impact of expected regulatory changes, and we estimate that the investment required to 
upgrade our existing buildings to the new minimum EPC B rating by 2030 is less than £10 million (including share of joint ventures) 
over and above specific refurbishment and development assumptions included in the valuation.
During the year, the Group capitalised £1.8 million (2023: £1.3 million) of employee costs in respect of its development team 
into investment properties under development. At 31 March 2024, the Group had capital commitments of £502.3 million 
(2023: £311.6 million). For further detail, see Our development activities on pages 23 to 25.
In April 2024, the Group exchanged contracts to buy The Courtyard, WC1 for £10.4 million of cash and through a property 
exchange of 95/96 New Bond Street for £18.2 million. At the reporting date, the acquisition has not yet completed.
164
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

10 Investment property continued
Key inputs to the valuation (by building and location) at 31 March 2024
ERV
True equivalent yield
Average  
£ per sq ft
Range  
£ per sq ft
Average  
%
Range  
%
North of Oxford Street
Office
102
74 – 174
5.3
4.8 – 7.3
Retail
67
34 – 110
5.3
4.5 – 10.0
Rest of West End
Office
143
70 – 249
5.8
5.0 – 7.3
Retail
115
15 – 295
5.0
3.2 – 6.8
City, Midtown and Southwark
Office
83
47 – 173
5.7
5.4 – 7.3
Retail
36
28 – 363
5.9
5.5 – 6.7
Key inputs to the valuation (by building and location) at 31 March 2023
ERV
True equivalent yield
Average  
£ per sq ft
Range  
£ per sq ft
Average  
%
Range  
%
North of Oxford Street
Office
88
54 – 131
4.8
4.3 – 6.8
Retail
63
33 – 107
4.5
4.2 – 7.5
Rest of West End
Office
101
57 – 163
5.4
3.3 – 7.3
Retail
96
15 – 266
4.7
3.2 – 7.1
City, Midtown and Southwark
Office
75
47 – 167
5.0
4.5 – 6.1
Retail
25
25 – 27
5.5
4.6 – 5.9
EPRA capital expenditure
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Group
Acquisitions
128.3
43.6
Developments
54.6
53.1
Interest capitalised
11.3
8.8
Investment properties: incremental lettable space
–
–
Investment properties: no incremental lettable space
85.3
28.8
Movement in lease incentives
7.4
5.9
Group total
286.9
140.2
Joint ventures (at share)
Developments
–
–
Interest capitalised
–
–
Investment properties: incremental lettable space
–
–
Investment properties: no incremental lettable space
5.7
1.3
Movement in lease incentives
2.4
7.8
Total capital expenditure
295.0
149.3
Conversion from accrual to cash basis
(12.0)
7.3
Total capital expenditure on a cash basis
283.0
156.6
Financial statements
165
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
10 Investment property continued
EPRA net initial yield (NIY) and topped-up NIY
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Properties at fair value including joint ventures
2,331.2
2,380.0
Less: properties under development including joint ventures
(201.5)
(89.0)
Less: residential properties
(4.7)
(12.4)
Like-for-like investment property portfolio, proposed and completed developments
2,125.0
2,278.6
Plus: estimated purchasers’ costs
155.0
166.3
Grossed-up completed property portfolio valuation (B)
2,280.0
2,444.9
Annualised cash passing rental income1
85.9
76.7
Net service charge expense including joint ventures
(5.1)
(3.3)
Other irrecoverable property costs including joint ventures
(7.9)
(12.9)
Annualised net rents (A)
72.9
60.5
Plus: rent-free periods and other lease incentives including joint ventures
3.9
16.8
Topped-up annualised net rents (C)
76.8
77.3
EPRA net initial yield (A/B)
3.2%
2.5%
EPRA topped-up initial yield (C/B)
3.4%
3.2%
1.	 Annualised passing rental income as calculated by the Group’s external valuers including joint ventures at share.
See note 9 for further detail on EPRA measures which are Alternative Performance Metrics.
11 Investment in joint ventures
The Group has the following investments in joint ventures:
Equity  
£m
Balances  
with  
partners  
£m
2024  
Total  
£m
2023  
Total  
£m
At 1 April
324.4
214.4
538.8
582.8
Movement on joint venture balances
–
(0.9)
(0.9)
(3.1)
Additions
0.1
–
0.1
–
Share of profit of joint ventures
9.8
–
9.8
9.8
Share of revaluation deficit of joint ventures
(56.5)
–
(56.5)
(43.2)
Share of results of joint ventures
(46.7)
–
(46.7)
(33.4)
Distributions
–
–
–
(7.5)
At 31 March
277.8
213.5
491.3
538.8
All of the Group’s joint ventures operate solely in the United Kingdom and comprise the following:
Country of registration
2024  
ownership
2023  
ownership
The GHS Limited Partnership
Jersey
50%
50%
The Great Ropemaker Partnership
United Kingdom
50%
50%
The Great Victoria Partnerships
United Kingdom
50%
50%
166
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

11 Investment in joint ventures continued 
The Group’s share in the assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses for the joint ventures is set out below:
The GHS  
Limited  
Partnership  
£m
The Great  
Ropemaker  
Partnership  
£m
The Great  
Victoria  
Partnerships  
£m
2024  
Total  
£m
2024  
At share  
£m
2023  
At share  
£m
Balance sheets
Investment property
643.6
245.4
73.5
962.5
481.2
529.6
Current assets
0.5
3.8
1.1
5.4
2.7
3.6
Cash and cash equivalents
13.1
19.6
18.7
51.4
25.7
17.7
Balances from partners
(222.0)
(131.8)
(73.1)
(426.9)
(213.5)
(214.4)
Current liabilities
(12.0)
(13.2)
(1.3)
(26.5)
(13.2)
(7.0)
Obligations under head leases
–
(10.2)
–
(10.2)
(5.1)
(5.1)
Net assets
423.2
113.6
18.9
555.7
277.8
324.4
The GHS  
Limited  
Partnership  
£m
The Great  
Ropemaker  
Partnership  
£m
The Great  
Victoria  
Partnerships  
£m
2024 
Total  
£m
2024  
At share  
£m
2023  
At share  
£m
Income statements
Revenue
24.7
21.5
6.8
53.0
26.5
25.5
Net rental income
20.1
14.6
4.1
38.8
19.4
18.2
Property and administration costs
(2.0)
(3.2)
(2.0)
(7.2)
(3.6)
(2.2)
Net finance costs
(9.0)
(3.1)
0.1
(12.0)
(6.0)
(6.2)
Share of profit from joint ventures
9.1
8.3
2.2
19.6
9.8
9.8
Revaluation of investment property
(25.8)
(77.4)
(9.8)
(113.0)
(56.5)
(43.2)
Results of joint ventures
(16.7)
(69.1)
(7.6)
(93.4)
(46.7)
(33.4)
At 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2023, the joint ventures had no external debt facilities.
Transactions during the year between the Group and its joint ventures, which are related parties, are disclosed below:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Movement on joint venture balances during the year
0.9
3.1
Balances receivable at the year end from joint ventures
(213.5)
(214.4)
Interest on balances with partners (see note 6)
5.8
5.9
Distributions
–
7.5
Joint venture fees paid (see note 3)
1.7
2.4
The joint venture balances are repayable on demand and bear interest as follows: the GHS Limited Partnership at 4.0% and the 
Great Ropemaker Partnership at 2.0%. In measuring expected credit losses of the balances receivable at the year end from 
joint ventures under IFRS 9, the ability of each joint venture to repay the loan at the reporting date if demanded by the Group 
is assumed to be through the sale of the investment properties held by the joint venture. Investment properties are held at fair 
value at each reporting date as described in note 10. Therefore, the net asset value of the joint venture is considered to be a 
reasonable approximation of the available assets that could be realised to recover the loan balance and the requirement to 
recognise expected credit losses.
The investment properties include £5.1 million (2023: £5.1 million) in respect of the present value of future ground rents; net of 
these amounts, the market value of our share of the total joint venture properties is £476.1 million. The Group earns fee income from 
its joint ventures for the provision of management services. All of the above transactions are made on terms equivalent to those 
that prevail in arm’s length transactions. See notes 10, 14 and 17 for more information on the valuation of investment properties 
and expected credit losses in joint ventures.
At 31 March 2024, the Group had £nil contingent liabilities arising in its joint ventures (2023: £nil). At 31 March 2024, the Group 
had capital commitments in respect of its joint ventures of £nil million (2023: £0.4 million).
Financial statements
167
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
12 Property, plant and equipment
Right of use 
asset for 
occupational 
leases  
£m
Leasehold  
improvements  
£m
Fixtures and  
fittings/
other  
£m
Total  
£m
Cost
At 1 April 2022
4.9
5.6
1.9
12.4
Costs capitalised
–
–
0.2
0.2
At 31 March 2023
4.9
5.6
2.1
12.6
Costs capitalised
–
–
0.1
0.1
At 31 March 2024
4.9
5.6
2.2
12.7
Depreciation
At 1 April 2023
3.3
3.9
1.9
9.1
Charge for the year
0.8
0.6
0.2
1.6
At 31 March 2024
4.1
4.5
2.1
10.7
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023
1.6
1.7
0.2
3.5
Carrying amount at 31 March 2024
0.8
1.1
0.1
2.0
13 Other investments
2024 
£m
2023 
£m
At 1 April
1.8
1.0
Acquisitions
0.8
0.7
(Deficit)/surplus on revaluation
(0.2)
0.1
At 31 March
2.4
1.8
In January 2020, the Group entered into a commitment of up to £5.0 million to invest in the Pi Labs European PropTech venture 
capital fund. At 31 March 2024, the Group had made net investments of £2.5 million. Launched in 2014, Pi Labs is Europe’s longest 
standing PropTech VC, and this third fund has a primary focus to invest in early stage PropTech start-ups across Europe and the 
UK that use technology solutions to enhance any stage of the real estate value chain. The valuation of the fund is based on the 
net assets of its investments therefore, given these are not readily traded, we have classified the valuation of the investments 
as Level 3 as defined by IFRS 13. Key areas of focus for the fund include sustainability, future of work, future of retail, commercial 
real estate technologies, construction technology and smart cities.
14 Trade and other receivables
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Trade receivables
6.7
8.3
Expected credit loss allowance
(0.3)
(1.7)
6.4
6.6
Prepayments
0.2
4.4
Other sales taxes
5.9
–
Other receivables
12.4
4.8
24.9
15.8
168
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

14 Trade and other receivables continued
Trade receivables consist of rent and service charge monies, which are typically due on the quarter day with no credit period. 
Interest is charged on trade receivables in accordance with the terms of the customer’s lease. Trade receivables are provided 
for based on the expected credit loss, which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance for all trade receivables based on an 
assessment of each individual customer’s circumstances. This assessment reviews the outstanding balances of each individual 
customer and makes an assessment of the likelihood of recovery, based on an evaluation of their financial situation. Where the 
expected credit loss relates to revenue already recognised, this has been recognised immediately in the income statement.
Of the gross trade receivables of £6.7 million, £4.4 million (2023: £5.5 million) was past due, of which £1.2 million (2023: £3.0 million) 
was over 30 days.
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Movements in expected credit loss allowance
Balance at the beginning of the year
(1.7)
(6.0)
Expected credit loss allowance during the year 
(0.3)
(1.0)
Expected credit loss allowance in respect of prior years
–
0.8
Amounts written-off as uncollectable
1.7
4.5
(0.3)
(1.7)
The expected credit loss for the year represents 5% (2023: 26%) of the net trade receivables balance at the balance sheet date.
15 Trade and other payables
2024 
£m
2023  
£m
Rents received in advance
16.4
15.1
Accrued capital expenditure
18.1
5.9
Payables in respect of customer rent deposits
17.0
16.2
Other accruals
23.3
15.2
Other taxes
–
0.7
Other payables
1.4
3.7
76.2
56.8
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade payables approximates their fair value.
Financial statements
169
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
16 Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Current liabilities at amortised cost
Unsecured
£175.0 million 2.15% private placement notes 2024
175.0
–
Non-current liabilities at amortised cost
Secured
£21.9 million 55⁄8% debenture stock 2029
22.0
22.0
Unsecured
£450.0 million revolving credit facility
46.1
12.8
£250.0 million term loan
248.3
–
£175.0 million 2.15% private placement notes 2024
–
174.8
£40.0 million 2.70% private placement notes 2028
39.9
39.9
£30.0 million 2.79% private placement notes 2030
29.9
29.9
£30.0 million 2.93% private placement notes 2033
29.9
29.9
£25.0 million 2.75% private placement notes 2032
24.9
24.9
£125.0 million 2.77% private placement notes 2035
124.4
124.3
Non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings
565.4
458.5
Total interest-bearing loans and borrowings
740.4
458.5
In April 2023, the Group extended the maturity of £50 million of its £450 million unsecured revolving credit facility (RCF) to 
January 2027, coterminous with the remainder of the facility. The facility is unsecured, attracts a floating rate based on a headline 
margin that was unchanged at 90.0 basis points over SONIA (plus or minus 2.5 basis points subject to a number of ESG-linked 
targets in future years).
In September 2023, the Group arranged a new £250 million unsecured term loan at a headline margin of 175 basis points over 
SONIA with three existing relationship banks. The loan has an initial three-year term which may be extended to a maximum 
of five years at GPE’s request, subject to bank consent. The Group also entered a £200 million interest rate cap (at a cost of 
£2.1 million) to protect against any further increases in rates whilst preserving the benefit of any reductions. The loan and 
interest rate cap were both effective from 9 October 2023.
In January 2024, the Group arranged a new £200 million loan facility at a headline margin of 75 basis points over SONIA, 
with the margin stepping up by 0.25% after six months, a further 0.25% after 12 months and a final step-up of 0.50% at 18 months. 
The loan has a one-year term, which may be extended by up to a further year at GPE’s request and was undrawn at 
31 March 2024. 
The Group’s £175.0 million 2.15% private placement notes 2024 were repaid on 22 May 2024.
At 31 March 2024, the nominal value of the Group’s interest-bearing loans and borrowing was £743.9 million (2023: £460.9 million) 
and the Group had £603 million (2023: £436.0 million) of undrawn credit facilities.
170
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

17 Financial instruments
Categories of financial instrument
Carrying  
amount  
2024  
£m
Amounts  
recognised in  
income  
statement  
2024  
£m
Gain/(loss)  
to equity  
2024  
£m
Carrying  
amount  
2023  
£m
Amounts  
recognised in  
income  
statement  
2023  
£m
Gain/(loss)  
to equity  
2023  
£m
Other investments
2.4
(0.2)
–
1.8
0.1
–
Interest rate cap
0.4
(1.7)
–
–
–
–
Assets at fair value
2.8
(1.9)
–
1.8
0.1
–
Balances with joint ventures 
213.5
5.8
–
214.4
5.9
–
Trade receivables
24.7
(0.1)
–
11.4
(0.8)
–
Cash and cash equivalents
22.9
0.3
–
19.4
0.1
–
Assets at amortised cost
261.1
6.0
–
245.2
5.2
–
Trade and other payables
(1.4)
–
–
(4.4)
–
–
Payables in respect of customer rent deposits
(17.0)
–
–
(16.2)
–
–
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
(740.4)
(15.2)
–
(458.5)
(9.0)
–
Obligations under occupational leases
(1.0)
–
–
(2.0)
(0.1)
–
Obligations under finance leases
(74.1)
(2.4)
–
(66.7)
(2.4)
–
Liabilities at amortised cost
(833.9)
(17.6)
–
(547.8)
(11.5)
–
Total financial instruments
(570.0)
(13.5)
–
(300.8)
(6.2)
–
Financial risk management objectives
Capital risk
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to operate on a going concern basis and as such 
it aims to maintain an appropriate mix of debt and equity financing. The current capital structure of the Group consists of a mix 
of equity and debt. Equity comprises issued share capital, reserves and retained earnings as disclosed in the Group statement 
of changes in equity. Debt comprises long-term debenture stock, private placement notes and drawings against committed 
revolving credit facilities from banks. The Group aims to maintain a loan-to-property value of between 10–35% (see note 10). 
The Group operates solely in the United Kingdom, and its operating profits and net assets are sterling denominated. As a result, 
the Group’s policy is to have no unhedged assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. 
The Group has a policy of reviewing the financial information of prospective customers and only dealing with those that are 
creditworthy and obtaining sufficient rental cash deposits or third-party guarantees as a means of mitigating financial loss 
from defaults. The concentration of credit risk is limited due to the large and diverse customer base, with no one customer 
providing more than 10% of the Group’s rental income. Details of the Group’s receivables, and the associated expected credit loss, 
are summarised in notes 11 and 14 of the financial statements. The Directors believe that there is no further expected credit 
loss required in excess of that provided. The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, which is 
net of impairment losses, represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk. The Group’s cash deposits are placed with 
a diversified range of investment grade banks, and strict counterparty limits ensure the Group’s exposure to bank failure 
is minimised.
Liquidity risk
The Group operates a framework for the management of its short-, medium- and long-term funding requirements. Cash flow 
and funding needs are regularly monitored to ensure sufficient undrawn facilities are in place. The Group’s funding sources 
are diversified across a range of bank and bond markets and strict counterparty limits are operated on deposits.
Financial statements
171
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
17 Financial instruments continued
The Group meets its day-to-day working capital requirements through the utilisation of its revolving credit facility. 
The availability of this facility depends on the Group complying with a number of key financial covenants; these covenants 
and the Group’s compliance with them are set out in the table below:
Key covenants
Covenant
March 2024  
actuals
Group
Net gearing (see note 9)
<125%
46.8%
Inner borrowing (unencumbered asset value/unsecured borrowings)
>1.66x
2.42x
Interest cover
>1.35x
3.65x
The Group has undrawn credit facilities of £603.0 million and has substantial headroom above all of its key covenants. As a result, 
the Directors consider the Group to have adequate liquidity to be able to fund the ongoing operations of the business.
The following tables detail the Group’s remaining contractual maturity on its financial instruments and have been drawn up 
based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities, including associated interest payments, based on the earliest 
date on which the Group is required to pay, and conditions existing at the balance sheet date:
At 31 March 2024
Carrying  
amount  
£m
Contractual  
cash flows  
£m
Less than  
one year  
£m
One to  
two years  
£m
Two to  
five years  
£m
More than  
five years  
£m
Non-derivative financial liabilities
£21.9 million 55⁄8% debenture stock 2029
22.0
27.8
1.2
1.2
25.4
–
£450.0 million revolving credit facility
46.1
58.9
4.2
4.2
50.5
–
£250.0 million term loan
248.3
291.3
17.2
17.2
256.9
–
Private placement notes
424.0
489.6
182.5
7.0
60.0
240.1
Derivative financial instruments
Interest rate cap
(0.4)
(0.3)
(0.2)
(0.1)
–
–
740.0
867.3
204.9
29.5
392.8
240.1
At 31 March 2023
Carrying  
amount  
£m
Contractual  
cash flows  
£m
Less than  
one year  
£m
One to  
two years  
£m
Two to  
five years  
£m
More than  
five years  
£m
Non-derivative financial liabilities
£21.9 million 55⁄8% debenture stock 2029
22.0
29.0
1.2
1.2
3.7
22.9
£450.0 million revolving credit facility
12.8
22.0
2.1
2.1
17.8
–
Private placement notes
423.7
500.2
10.8
182.5
20.8
286.1
458.5
551.2
14.1
185.8
42.3
309.0
The maturity of lease obligations is set out in notes 18 and 19.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk arises from the Group’s use of interest-bearing financial instruments. It is the risk that future cash flows arising 
from a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in interest rates. It is the Group’s policy to reduce interest rate risk in 
respect of the cash flows arising from its debt finance either through the use of fixed rate debt or through the use of interest 
rate derivatives such as swaps, caps and floors. It is the Group’s usual policy to maintain the proportion of floating interest rate 
exposure to between 20–40% of forecast total debt. However, this target is flexible, and may not be adhered to at all times 
depending on, for example, the Group’s view of future interest rate movements.
Interest rate caps
Interest rate caps protect the Group from rises in short-term interest rates by making a payment to the Group when the 
underlying interest rate exceeds a specified rate (the ‘cap rate’) on a notional value. If the underlying rate exceeds the cap rate, 
the payment is based upon the difference between the two rates, ensuring the Group only pays the maximum of the cap rate. 
At 31 March 2024, the Group’s only interest rate derivative was a £200 million interest rate cap.
172
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

17 Financial instruments continued
Interest rate sensitivity
The sensitivity analysis below has been determined based on the exposure to interest rates for financial instruments at the 
balance sheet date, and represents management’s assessment of possible changes in interest rates based on historical trends. 
For the floating rate liabilities, the analysis is prepared assuming the amount of the liability at 31 March 2024 was outstanding 
for the whole year:
Impact on loss
Impact on equity
2024 
£m
2023  
£m
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Increase of 50 basis points
(0.5)
(0.1)
(0.5)
(0.1)
Increase of 25 basis points
(0.2)
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.1)
Decrease of 25 basis points
0.7
0.1
0.7
0.1
Decrease of 50 basis points
1.5
0.1
1.5
0.1
Fair value of interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Book value  
2024  
£m
Fair value  
2024  
£m
Book value  
2023  
£m
Fair value  
2023  
£m
Items carried at fair value
Interest rate cap (asset)
(0.4)
(0.4)
–
–
Items not carried at fair value
£21.9 million 55⁄8% debenture stock 2029
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.4
£450.0 million revolving credit facility
46.1
46.1
12.8
12.8
£250.0 million term loan
248.3
248.3
–
–
Private placement notes
424.0
373.3
423.7
339.9
740.0
689.3
458.5
375.1
The fair values of the Group’s private placement notes were determined by comparing the discounted future cash flows using 
the contracted yields with those of the reference gilts plus the implied margins, representing Level 2 fair value measurements 
as defined by IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement. The fair values of the Group’s outstanding interest rate cap has been estimated 
by calculating the present value of future cash flows, using appropriate market discount rates, representing Level 2 fair value 
measurements as defined by IFRS 13. The fair values of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents and trade payables and receivables 
are not materially different from those at which they are carried in the financial statements.
The following table details the principal amounts and remaining terms of interest rate derivatives outstanding:
Average contracted  
fixed interest rate
Notional  
principal amount
Fair value asset
2024  
%
2023  
%
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Cash flow hedges
Interest rate cap
5.094%
–
200.0
–
0.4
–
The Group entered a £200 million interest rate cap (at a cost of £2.1 million) effective from 9 October 2023 and expires in 
September 2025.
18 Head lease obligations
Head lease obligations in respect of the Group’s leasehold properties are payable as follows:
Minimum  
lease  
payments  
2024  
£m
Interest  
2024  
£m
Principal 
payments  
2024  
£m
Minimum  
lease  
payments  
2023  
£m
Interest  
2023  
£m
Principal 
payments 
2023  
£m
Less than one year
2.9
(2.9)
–
2.4
(2.4)
–
Between one and five years
11.5
(11.3)
0.2
9.7
(9.5)
0.2
More than five years
358.0
(284.1)
73.9
304.5
(238.0)
66.5
372.4
(298.3)
74.1
316.6
(249.9)
66.7
Financial statements
173
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
19 Occupational lease obligations
Obligations in respect of the Group’s occupational leases for its head office are payable as follows:
Minimum  
lease  
payments  
2024  
£m
Interest  
2024  
£m
Principal  
payments  
2024  
£m
Minimum  
lease  
payments  
2023  
£m
Interest  
2023  
£m
Principal  
payments  
2023  
£m
Less than one year
1.0
–
1.0
1.0
–
1.0
Between one and five years
–
–
–
1.0
–
1.0
1.0
–
1.0
2.0
–
2.0
20 Share capital
2024  
Number
2024  
£m
2023 
Number
2023  
£m
Allotted, called up and fully paid ordinary shares of 155⁄19 pence
At 1 April and 31 March
253,867,911
38.7
253,867,911
38.7
At 31 March 2024, the Company had 253,867,911 ordinary shares with a nominal value of 155⁄19 pence each.
21 Investment in own shares
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
At 1 April
(2.8)
(3.6)
Employee share-based incentive charges
(4.0)
(1.3)
Transfer to retained earnings
1.2
2.1
At 31 March
(5.6)
(2.8)
The investment in the Company’s own shares is held at cost and comprises 887,159 shares (2023: 887,159 shares) held by the 
Great Portland Estates plc LTIP Employee Share Trust, which will vest for certain senior employees of the Group if performance 
conditions are met. During the year, no shares (2023: 192,112) vested to Directors and senior employees and no additional shares 
were acquired by the Trust (2023: 201,936). The fair value of shares awarded and outstanding at 31 March 2024 was £9.8 million 
(2023: £8.4 million).
Details of outstanding share plans are set out below:
Date of Grant/Fair value (pence)
At 1 April 2023
No. of shares
Granted
No. of shares
Vested
No. of shares
Lapsed/ 
forfeit
No. of shares
At 31 March 
2024
No. of shares
Vesting dates
Long Term Incentive Plan
29 July 2020/581p
1,619,621
–
–
(1,619,621)
–
28 July 2023
12 November 2020/704p
19,522
–
–
(19,522)
–
11 November 2023
7 June 2021/733p
1,358,980
–
–
(19,545)
1,339,435
6 June 2024
27 May 2022/645p
1,926,632
–
–
(126,942)
1,799,690
26 May 2025
Restricted Share Plan
7 July 2023/422p
–
1,220,784
–
(119,474)
1,101,310
6 July 2026
24 November 2023/408p
–
10,283
–
–
10,283
23 November 2026
4,924,755
1,231,067
–
(1,905,104)
4,250,718
174
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

22 Cash and cash equivalents
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Cash held at bank (unrestricted)
5.9
3.2
Amounts held in respect of customer rent deposits (restricted)
17.0
16.2
22.9
19.4
Amounts held in respect of customer rent deposits are subject to restrictions as set out in the customers’ lease agreement 
and therefore not available for general use by the Group.
23 Notes to the Group statement of cash flows
Reconciliation of financing liabilities
1 April  
2023  
£m
New  
obligations  
£m
Inflows/
(outflows)  
£m
Other 
non-cash 
movements  
£m
31 March  
2024  
£m
Long-term interest-bearing loans and borrowings
458.5
248.0
33.5
(174.6)
565.4
Short-term interest-bearing loans and borrowings
–
–
–
175.0
175.0
Obligations under leases
68.7
7.4
(3.3)
2.3
75.1
527.2
255.4
30.2
2.7
815.5
1 April  
2022  
£m
New 
obligations  
£m
Inflows/
(outflows)  
£m
Other non 
cash 
movements  
£m
31 March  
2023  
£m
Long-term interest-bearing loans and borrowings
531.0
–
(73.0)
0.5
458.5
Short-term interest-bearing loans and borrowings
0.2
–
(0.2)
–
–
Obligations under leases
58.5
11.1
(3.3)
2.4
68.7
589.7
11.1
(76.5)
2.9
527.2
Adjustment for non-cash items
Adjustments for non-cash items used in the reconciliation of cash generated used in operations in the Group statement of cash 
flows’ is disclosed below:
2024 
£m
2023
£m
Deficit from investment property
267.3
145.0
Deficit/(surplus) on revaluation of other investments
0.2
(0.1)
Employee share-based incentive charge
4.0
1.3
Spreading of lease incentives
(5.7)
(5.9)
Share of results of joint ventures
46.7
33.4
Depreciation
1.6
1.7
Other
(0.7)
(0.3)
Adjustments for non-cash items
313.4
175.1
24 Dividends
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Dividends paid
Interim dividend for the year ended 31 March 2024 of 4.7 pence per share
11.9
–
Final dividend for the year ended 31 March 2023 of 7.9 pence per share
20.0
–
Interim dividend for the year ended 31 March 2023 of 4.7 pence per share
–
11.9
Final dividend for the year ended 31 March 2022 of 7.9 pence per share
–
20.0
31.9
31.9
A final dividend of 7.9 pence per share was approved by the Board on 22 May 2024 and, subject to shareholder approval, will be paid 
on 8 July 2024 to shareholders on the register on 31 May 2024. The dividend is not recognised as a liability at 31 March 2024. The 2023 
final dividend and the 2023 interim dividend are included within the Group statement of changes in equity.
Financial statements
175
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
25 Lease receivables
Future aggregate minimum rentals receivable under non-cancellable leases are:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
The Group as a lessor
Less than one year
66.0
58.3
Between two and five years
141.0
129.9
More than five years
62.9
66.7
269.9
254.9
The Group leases its investment properties under operating leases. The weighted average length of lease at 31 March 2024 
was 3.4 years (2023: 3.2 years). All investment properties, except those under development, generated rental income, and 
£nil contingent rents were recognised in the year (2023: £nil).
26 Employee benefits
The Group operates a UK-funded approved defined contribution plan. The Group’s contribution for the year was £1.8 million 
(2023: £1.5 million). The Group also contributes to a defined benefit final salary pension plan (the Plan), the assets of which 
are held and managed by trustees separately from the assets of the Group. The Plan has been closed to new entrants since 
April 2002. The most recent actuarial valuation of the Plan was conducted at 1 April 2023 by a qualified independent actuary 
using the projected unit method. The Plan was valued using the following key actuarial assumptions:
2024  
%
2023  
%
Discount rate
4.90
4.80
Expected rate of salary increases
4.10
4.20
RPI inflation
3.10
3.20
Rate of future pension increases
2.90
2.90
Life expectancy assumptions at age 65:
2024  
Years
2023  
Years
Retiring today age 65 – male:female
23:25
25:26
Retiring in 25 years (age 40 today) – male:female
25:27
27:29
Changes in the present value of the pension obligation are as follows:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Defined benefit obligation at 1 April
26.9
35.9
Service cost
0.2
0.3
Interest cost
1.2
1.1
Effect of changes in demographic assumptions
(1.9)
–
Effect of changes in financial assumptions
(0.5)
(10.5)
Effect of experience adjustments
1.3
1.1
Benefits paid
(1.3)
(1.0)
Present value of defined benefit obligation at 31 March
25.9
26.9
176
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

26 Employee benefits continued
Changes to the fair value of the Plan assets are as follows:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Fair value of the Plan assets at 1 April
31.0
39.4
Interest income
1.5
1.1
Actuarial loss
(1.0)
(9.1)
Employer contributions
0.6
0.6
Benefits paid
(1.3)
(1.0)
Fair value of the Plan assets at 31 March
30.8
31.0
Net pension asset
4.9
4.1
The amount recognised immediately in the Group statement of comprehensive income was £0.1 million (2023: £0.3 million).
The amount recognised in the balance sheet in respect of the Plan is as follows:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Present value of unfunded obligations
(25.9)
(26.9)
Fair value of the Plan assets
30.8
31.0
Pension asset
4.9
4.1
Amounts recognised as administration expenses in the income statement are as follows:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Current service cost
(0.2)
(0.3)
Net interest income
0.3
–
0.1
(0.3)
All equity and debt instruments have quoted prices in active markets. The fair value of the Plan assets at the balance sheet date 
is analysed as follows:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Cash
0.1
0.1
Equities
1.6
11.9
Bonds
27.6
19.0
Derivatives
1.5
–
30.8
31.0
Other than market and demographic risks, which are common to all retirement benefit schemes, there are no specific risks 
in the relevant benefit schemes which the Group considers to be significant or unusual. Detail on two of the more specific risks 
are detailed below:
Changes in bond yields
Falling bond yields tend to increase the funding and accounting liabilities. However, the investment in corporate and government 
bonds offers a degree of matching, i.e. the movement in assets arising from changes in bond yields partially matches the 
movement in the funding or accounting liabilities. In this way, the exposure to movements in bond yields is reduced.
Financial statements
177
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continued
26 Employee benefits continued
Life expectancy
The majority of the obligations are to provide a pension for the life of the member on retirement, so increases in life expectancy 
will result in an increase in the liabilities. The inflation-linked nature of the majority of benefit payments increases the sensitivity 
of the liabilities to changes in life expectancy.
The effect on the defined benefit obligation of changing the key assumptions, calculated using approximate methods based 
on historical trends, is set out below:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Discount rate -0.25%
26.9
27.9
Discount rate +0.25%
25.1
26.0
RPI inflation -0.25%
25.6
26.5
RPI inflation +0.25%
26.3
27.4
Post-retirement mortality assumption – one year age rating
26.9
27.9
Given the Plan surplus, the Group has agreed to pause contributions to the Plan. Accordingly, the Group expects to contribute 
£nil (2023: £0.6 million) to the Plan in the year ending 31 March 2024. The expected total benefit payments for the year ending 
31 March 2024 are £0.9 million, rising to around £1.1 million per annum over the next five years. A total of c.£6.6 million is expected 
to be paid over the subsequent five year period.
27 Reserves
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within equity:
Share capital: The nominal value of the Company’s issued share capital, comprising 155⁄19 pence ordinary shares.
Share premium: Amount subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value, less directly attributable issue costs.
Capital redemption reserve: Amount equivalent to the nominal value of the Company’s own shares acquired as a result 
of share buyback programmes.
Retained earnings: Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the Group income statement together with other items 
such as dividends.
Investment in own shares: Amount paid to acquire the Company’s own shares for its Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan 
less accounting charges.
178
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Great Portland Estates plc
Report on the audit of the financial statements
Opinion
In our opinion:
	
– Great Portland Estates plc’s group financial statements and company financial statements (the “financial statements”) 
give a true and fair view of the state of the group’s and of the company’s affairs as at 31 March 2024 and of the group’s loss 
and the group’s cash flows for the year then ended;
	
– the group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting 
standards as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006;
	
– the company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting 
Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and applicable law); and
	
– the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Accounts (the “Annual Report”), which comprise: 
the group and company Balance Sheets as at 31 March 2024; the group Income Statement, the group Statement of Comprehensive 
Income, the group Statement of Cash Flows, and the group and company Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended; 
and the notes to the financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.
Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our  
responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section  
of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We remained independent of the group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the 
financial statements in the UK, which includes the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, 
and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were 
not provided.
Other than those disclosed in Note 5 to the Financial Statements, we have provided no non-audit services to the company 
or its controlled undertakings in the period under audit.
Our audit approach
Context
The year ended 31 March 2024 is our first year as the external auditors of the group. Following the external audit tender in 2022,  
we undertook certain transition activities, including attending key governance meetings during the 2023 financial reporting process.  
In planning for our first year audit, we met with the Audit Committee and members of management across the group to understand 
the business and any significant changes during the year, and to understand their perspectives on associated business risks. 
We used this insight, in addition to our reviewing the previous auditors’ audit work papers, when forming our own views regarding 
the audit risks and as part of developing our planned audit approach to address those risks.
Overview
Audit scope
	
– Our audit scope has been determined to provide coverage of all material financial statement line items, and as part of 
designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.
	
– The group’s investment properties are held across a number of subsidiary and joint venture entities within the group 
financial statements. All work was carried out by the group audit team with additional procedures performed at the group 
level to ensure sufficient coverage for our opinion on the group financial statements as a whole.
Key audit matters
	
– Valuation of investment properties, either held directly or through joint ventures (group).
	
– Recoverability of investments and loans to subsidiaries and joint ventures (parent).
Materiality
	
– Overall group materiality: £24.7 million based on 1% of total assets.
	
– Overall company materiality: £22.3 million based on 1% of total assets.
	
– Performance materiality: £18.5 million (group) and £16.7 million (company).
	
– Specific group materiality: £0.89 million based on 5% of the group’s adjusted profit before tax. 
Financial statements
179
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Independent auditors’ report continued
The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit 
of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement 
(whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit 
strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and 
any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial 
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation of investment properties, 
either held directly or through joint 
ventures (group)
Refer to the Audit Committee Report and 
the Financial Statements (including notes to 
the Financial Statements; Note 1, Accounting 
policies; Note 10, Investment property; and 
Note 11, Investments in joint ventures).
We focused on the valuation of investment 
properties because investment properties 
represent the principal element of the net 
asset value as disclosed in the group Balance 
Sheet in the Financial Statements and is an 
area of significant estimation uncertainty. 
The portfolio is held by the group, and 
through joint ventures.
The portfolio includes completed investment 
properties and properties under development. 
The valuation of the group’s portfolio is 
inherently subjective due to, among other 
factors, the individual nature of each property, 
its location and the expected future rentals 
for that particular property. The wider 
challenges currently facing the real estate 
sector as a result of the macroeconomic 
environment further contributed to the 
subjectivity at 31 March 2024.
Valuations are carried out by third party 
valuers CBRE (the ‘Valuers’). The Valuers were 
engaged by the Directors, and performed 
their work in accordance with the Royal 
Institution of Chartered Surveyors (‘RICS’) 
Valuation – Global Standards 2022. The 
valuations take into account the property-
specific information including the current 
tenancy agreements and rental income, 
condition and location of the property, and 
future rental prospects, as well as prevailing 
market yields and market transactions.
Given the inherent subjectivity involved in the valuation of investment properties, 
and therefore the need for deep market knowledge when determining the most 
appropriate assumptions, and the technicalities of the valuation methodology, 
we engaged our internal valuation experts to assist us in our audit of this matter.
Assessing group’s external Valuers’ expertise and objectivity
We assessed the Valuers’ qualifications and expertise and read their terms of 
engagement with the group to determine whether there were any matters that 
might have affected their objectivity or may have imposed scope limitations 
upon their work. We also considered fees and other contractual arrangements 
that might exist between the group and the Valuers. We found no evidence to 
suggest that the objectivity of the Valuers was compromised.
Testing the valuations assumptions and capital movement
We obtained and read the CBRE valuation reports covering all of the group’s 
investment properties. We held meetings with management and the Valuers, 
at which the valuations and the key assumptions therein were discussed. We 
focused on the largest properties, properties under development, flex spaces, 
short leaseholds and any outliers (where the assumptions used and/or year on 
year capital value movement were out of line with our range of assumptions 
developed using externally published market data for the relevant sector). 
To verify that the valuation approach was suitable for use in determining the 
carrying value for investment properties in the Financial Statements, we:
	
– Confirmed that the valuation approach was in accordance with RICS standards;
	
– Obtained valuation details of every property held by the group and 
developed ranges for each key valuation assumption or capital value 
movement, determined by reference to published benchmarks and using 
our experience and knowledge of the market. We compared the investment 
yields used by the Valuers with the expected range of yields and the year 
on year capital movement to our expected range;
	
– Assessed the reasonableness of other assumptions that are not readily 
comparable with published benchmarks, such as Estimated Rental Value;
	
– For developments valued using the residual valuation method, we obtained 
the development appraisals and assessed the reasonableness of the Valuers’ 
key assumptions. This included comparing the yield to comparable market 
benchmarks, comparing the costs to complete estimates to development 
plans and contracts, and considering the reasonableness of other assumptions 
that are not so readily comparable with published benchmarks, such as 
estimated rental value and developers’ profit; and
	
– With the support of our internal valuation experts, we also questioned the 
Valuers as to the extent to which yields and expected rental values used 
in deriving their valuations took into account the impact of climate change 
and ESG considerations.
180
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation of investment properties, 
either held directly or through joint 
ventures (group) continued
In addition to the above, where assumptions were outside the expected 
range or otherwise appeared unusual, and/or valuations showed unexpected 
movements, we undertook further investigations and, when necessary, 
held further discussions with the Valuers and obtained evidence to support 
explanations received. The supporting evidence and valuation commentaries 
provided by the Valuers, enabled us to consider the property specific factors 
that had or may have had an impact on value, including recent comparable 
transactions where appropriate.
Information and standing data
We agreed the amounts per the valuation reports to the accounting records 
and from there we agreed the related balances through to the Financial 
Statements. We tested the standing data which the group provided to the 
Valuers for use in the performance of the valuation. For operating properties, 
we agreed tenancy information to supporting evidence on a sample basis. 
For properties under development, we confirmed that the supporting information 
for construction contracts and budgets, which was supplied to the Valuers, 
was also consistent with the group’s records for example by inspecting 
construction contracts. For these properties, capitalised expenditure was 
tested on a sample basis to invoices, and budgeted costs to complete 
compared to supporting evidence.
We have no matters to report in respect of our work over the valuation 
of investment properties.
Recoverability of investments and loans 
to subsidiaries and joint ventures (parent)
Refer to the Financial Statements 
(including notes to the Financial Statements; 
Note 1, Accounting policies; Note 11, 
Investments in joint ventures; and Note iii, 
Fixed asset investments).
The company has investments in subsidiaries 
of £1,240.6 million (2023: £1,240.8 million) 
and loans to subsidiaries of £761.2 million 
(2023: £548.4 million) at 31 March 2024. The 
company has investments in joint ventures 
of £0.1 million (2023: £0.1 million) and loans 
to joint ventures of £213.5 million (2023: £214.4 
million) at 31 March 2024. This is following the 
recognition of a £11.2 million (2023: £2.2 million) 
provision for impairment in investments 
and loans to subsidiaries, and a £0.0 million 
(2023: £0.1 million) provision for impairment 
investments and loans to joint ventures in 
the year.
The company’s accounting policy for 
investments and loans is to hold them at 
cost less any impairment. Impairment of the 
loans is calculated in accordance with IFRS 9, 
where expected credit losses are considered 
to be the excess of the company’s loan to a 
subsidiary over the subsidiary net asset value. 
Investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures 
are assessed for impairment in line with IAS 36.
We assessed the accounting policy for investments and loans to subsidiaries 
and joint ventures to ensure they were compliant with FRS 101 “Reduced 
Disclosure Framework”. We obtained management’s impairment assessments 
for the recoverability of investments and loans in subsidiaries and joint 
ventures as at 31 March 2024.
We verified that the methodology used by management in arriving at the 
carrying value of the investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures was in line 
with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, and that for loans to subsidiaries and joint 
ventures the expected credit loss was in line with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, 
including the related provision for impairment of investments and loans.
We identified the key estimate within the assessment of impairment of the 
investments and loans to subsidiaries and joint ventures to be the underlying 
valuation of investment property held by the subsidiaries and joint ventures. 
For details of our procedures over investment property valuations please 
refer to the related group key audit matter above.
We have no matters to report in respect of this work.
Financial statements
181
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Independent auditors’ report continued
How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial 
statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the group and the company, the accounting processes and controls, 
and the industry in which they operate.
The group’s investment properties are held across a number of subsidiary and joint venture entities within the group 
financial statements. All work was carried out by the group audit team with additional procedures performed at the group 
level to ensure sufficient coverage for our opinion on the group financial statements as a whole.
The group operates a common IT environment, processes and controls across all reported segments. In establishing the 
overall approach to our audit, we assessed the risk of material misstatement, taking into account the nature, likelihood and 
potential magnitude of any misstatement. Following this assessment, we applied professional judgement to determine 
the extent of testing required over each balance in the financial statements.
In respect of the audit of the company, the group audit team performed a full scope statutory audit, leveraging on the 
work performed on the group audit where appropriate with additional audit procedures performed on other company 
specific balances.
The impact of climate risk on our audit
In planning our audit, we made enquiries with management to understand the extent of the potential impact of climate change 
risk on the financial statements. Our evaluation of this conclusion included challenging key judgements and estimates in areas 
where we considered that there was greatest potential for climate change impact. We particularly considered how climate 
change risks would impact the assumptions made in the valuation of investment properties as explained in our key audit 
matter above. We also considered the consistency of the disclosures in relation to climate change made within the Annual Report, 
the financial statements and the knowledge obtained from our audit. We assessed the consideration of the cost of delivering 
the group’s climate change and sustainability strategy within the going concern and viability forecasts.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. 
These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and 
extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect 
of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
Financial statements – group
Financial statements – company
Overall materiality
£24.7 million.
£22.3 million.
How we determined it
1% of total assets.
1% of total assets.
Rationale for 
benchmark applied
The primary measurement attribute of the group 
is the carrying value of investment properties. 
On this basis,we set an overall group materiality 
level based on total assets.
The primary measurement attribute of the 
company is the carrying value of investments 
in subsidiaries. On this basis, we set an overall 
company materiality level based on total assets.
For each component in the scope of our group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall group materiality. 
The range of materiality allocated across components was between £1.1 million and £22.3 million. Certain components were 
audited to a local statutory audit materiality that was also less than our overall group materiality.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and 
undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope 
of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example 
in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% of overall materiality, amounting to £18.5 million for the 
group financial statements and £16.7 million for the company financial statements.
In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors – the history of misstatements, risk assessment 
and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls – and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range 
was appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £1.2 million 
(group audit) and £1.1 million (company audit) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our view, warranted 
reporting for qualitative reasons.
In addition we agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our group 
audit above £0.04 million for misstatements related to adjusted profit before tax within the financial statements, as well as 
misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
182
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Conclusions relating to going concern
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the group’s and the company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern 
basis of accounting included:
	
– Procedures to identify events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the ability to continue as a going concern 
and whether or not a material uncertainty related to going concern exists;
	
– Obtaining the directors’ assessment of going concern and assessing the current impact of severe, but plausible, downside 
scenarios and the basis for the downside stress scenarios that have been applied;
	
– Evaluation and corroboration of management’s significant assumptions used to assess going concern, including whether 
or not they align with our understanding of the entity and other relevant areas of the entity’s business activities; and
	
– Considered the appropriateness of the mitigating actions available to management in the event of the downside scenario 
materialising. Specifically, we focused on whether these actions are within the group’s control and are achievable.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, 
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the group’s and the company’s ability to continue as a going concern 
for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in 
the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the group’s 
and the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the directors’ reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material 
to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the directors 
considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections 
of this report.
Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ 
report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover 
the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated 
in this report, any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, 
consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained 
in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material 
misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial 
statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that 
there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report 
based on these responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic report and Report of the Directors, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the 
UK Companies Act 2006 have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions 
and matters as described below.
Strategic report and Report of the Directors
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report and 
Report of the Directors for the year ended 31 March 2024 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared 
in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the group and company and their environment obtained in the course of 
the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic report and Report of the Directors.
Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with 
the Companies Act 2006.
Financial statements
183
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Independent auditors’ report continued
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’ statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of 
the corporate governance statement relating to the company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other 
information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate 
governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, 
and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
	
– The directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
	
– The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging 
risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;
	
– The directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern 
basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the group’s and company’s 
ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements;
	
– The directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the group’s and company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers 
and why the period is appropriate; and
	
– The directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in 
operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing 
attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.
Our review of the directors’ statement regarding the longer-term viability of the group and company was substantially less in 
scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process supporting their statement; 
checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering 
whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the group and 
company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the 
corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during 
the audit:
	
– The directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, 
and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the group’s and company’s position, performance, 
business model and strategy;
	
– The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and
	
– The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee.
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors’ statement relating to the company’s 
compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the 
Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the 
financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view.  
The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of 
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the group’s and the company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis 
of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the group or the company or to cease operations, or have no 
realistic alternative but to do so.
184
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance 
is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a 
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually 
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of 
these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with 
our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent 
to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the group and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and 
regulations related to compliance with the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) status Part 12 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and 
UK regulatory principles, such as those governed by the Listings Rules, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance 
might have a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct 
impact on the financial statements such as Companies Act 2006. We evaluated management’s incentives and opportunities 
for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the 
principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to increase revenue, and management bias in accounting 
estimates and judgemental areas of the financial statements such as the valuation of investment properties. Audit procedures 
performed by the engagement team included:
	
– Discussions with management and internal audit, including consideration of known or suspected instances of non-compliance 
with laws and regulations and fraud, and review of the reports made by internal audit;
	
– Understanding management’s internal controls designed to prevent and detect irregularities;
	
– Reviewing the group’s litigation register in so far as it related to non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud;
	
– Reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including those of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee;
	
– Designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around the nature, timing and extent of our testing;
	
– Reviewing tax compliance with the involvement of our tax specialists in the audit;
	
– Challenging assumptions and judgements made by management in their significant areas of estimation including 
procedures relating to the valuation of investment properties; and
	
– Identifying and testing journal entries, in particular any journal entries posted with unusual account combinations.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of 
non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial 
statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one 
resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, 
or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing 
techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. 
We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit 
sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at: 
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report.
Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company’s members as a body in accordance with 
Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume 
responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save 
where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Financial statements
185
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Independent auditors’ report continued
Other required reporting
Companies Act 2006 exception reporting
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
	
– we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
	
– adequate accounting records have not been kept by the company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been 
received from branches not visited by us; or
	
– certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
	
– the company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement 
with the accounting records and returns.
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Appointment
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members on 6 July 2023 to audit the 
financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2024 and subsequent financial periods. This is therefore our first year 
of uninterrupted engagement.
Other matter
The company is required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules to include these 
financial statements in an annual financial report prepared under the structured digital format required by DTR 4.1.15R – 4.1.18R 
and filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the Financial Conduct Authority. This auditors’ report provides no assurance 
over whether the structured digital format annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
Saira Choudhry
(Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors  
London
22 May 2024
186
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Notes
2024  
£m
2023
£m
Non-current assets
Fixed asset investments
iii
1,240.7
1,240.9
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings
761.2
548.4
Amounts owed by joint ventures
213.5
214.4
Derivative financial instruments
17
0.4
–
2,215.8
2,003.7
Current assets
Other debtors
6.6
1.3
Deferred tax
vi
–
1.2
Cash at bank and short-term deposits
6.0
9.2
12.6
11.7
Total assets
2,228.4
2,015.4
Current liabilities
iv
(1,205.0)
(1,023.2)
Non-current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
v
(565.4)
(458.5)
(565.4)
(458.5)
Total liabilities
(1,770.4)
(1,481.7)
Net assets
458.0
533.7
Capital and reserves
Share capital
20
38.7
38.7
Share premium account
46.0
46.0
Capital redemption reserve
326.7
326.7
Retained earnings
41.0
119.5
Investment in own shares
21
5.6
2.8
Shareholders’ funds
458.0
533.7
Notes: The loss within the Company financial statements was £47.8 million (2023: £25.0 million). References in roman numerals refer 
to the notes to the Company financial statements, references in numbers refer to the notes to the Group financial statements.
The financial statements of Great Portland Estates plc (registered number: 00596137) were approved by the Board on  
22 May 2024 and signed on its behalf by:
Toby Courtauld	
	
Nick Sanderson
Chief Executive	
	
Chief Financial & Operating Officer
Company balance sheet
At 31 March 2024
Financial statements
187
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes
Share 
capital 
£m
Share  
premium 
account 
£m
Capital 
redemption 
reserve 
£m
Retained 
earnings 
£m
Investment  
in own  
shares  
£m
Total  
equity  
£m
Total equity at 1 April 2023
38.7
46.0
326.7
119.5
2.8
533.7
Loss for the year and total 
comprehensive expense
–
–
–
(47.8)
–
(47.8)
Dividends to shareholders
24
–
–
–
(31.9)
–
(31.9)
Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan charge
21
–
–
–
–
4.0
4.0
Transfer to retained earnings
21
–
–
–
1.2
(1.2)
–
Total equity at 31 March 2024
38.7
46.0
326.7
41.0
5.6
458.0
At 31 March 2024, the Company had unaudited realised profits available for distribution of approximately £30 million.
Company statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 March 2023
Notes
Share 
capital 
£m
Share  
premium 
account 
£m
Capital 
redemption 
reserve 
£m
Retained 
earnings 
£m
Investment  
in own  
shares  
£m
Total  
equity  
£m
Total equity at 1 April 2022
38.7
46.0
326.7
174.3
3.6
589.3
Loss for the year and total 
comprehensive expense
–
–
–
(25.0)
–
(25.0)
Dividends to shareholders
24
–
–
–
(31.9)
–
(31.9)
Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan charge
21
–
–
–
–
1.3
1.3
Transfer to retained earnings
21
–
–
–
2.1
(2.1)
–
Total equity at 31 March 2023
38.7
46.0
326.7
119.5
2.8
533.7
Company statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 March 2024
188
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Notes forming part of the Company financial statements
i Accounting policies
Accounting convention
Great Portland Estates plc is a public company limited by shares incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom 
(England and Wales). The address of the registered office is given on page 202. The financial statements have been prepared 
on the historical cost basis except for the remeasurement of certain financial instruments to fair value. Historical cost is 
generally based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for the goods and services. There were no significant 
judgements made or critical estimates applied in the preparation of the financial statements.
Disclosure exemptions adopted
The separate financial statements of the Company are presented as required by the Companies Act 2006. The Company meets 
the definition of a qualifying entity under FRS 100 (Financial Reporting Standard 100) issued by the Financial Reporting Council. 
Accordingly, the financial statements have therefore been prepared in accordance with FRS 101 (Financial Reporting Standard 
101) Reduced Disclosure Framework as issued by the Financial Reporting Council incorporating the Amendments to FRS 101 
issued by the FRC in July 2015 and July 2016.
In preparing these financial statements, Great Portland Estates plc has taken advantage of all disclosure exemptions conferred 
by FRS 101. Therefore these financial statements do not include:
	
– certain comparative information as otherwise required by the United Kingdom adopted international accounting standards;
	
– certain disclosures regarding the Company’s capital;
	
– a statement of cash flows;
	
– certain disclosures in respect of financial instruments;
	
– the effect of future accounting standards not yet adopted; and
	
– disclosure of related party transactions with wholly-owned members of the Group.
The above disclosure exemptions have been adopted because equivalent disclosures are included in the consolidated Group 
accounts into which Great Portland Estates plc is consolidated.
Subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures
The Company is a holding and financing company for the Great Portland Estates plc Group. Shares in subsidiary undertakings 
and joint ventures are carried at amounts equal to their original cost less any provision for impairment.
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures are expected to remain outstanding for the foreseeable future and 
therefore deemed long term in nature and classified as non-current assets and are stated at amortised cost including a provision 
for expected credit losses. For the purposes of impairment assessment, amounts to subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures 
are considered low credit risk and, therefore, the Company measures the provision at an amount equal to 12-month expected 
credit losses. Provision for expected credit losses in the current and prior year are immaterial.
Other
Accounting policies for share-based payments, other investment, deferred tax and financial instruments are the same as those 
of the Group and are set out on pages 152 to 155.
The Company participates in a Group defined benefit scheme which is the legal responsibility of Great Portland Estates Services 
Limited as the sponsoring employer. There is no contractual agreement or stated policy for charging the net defined benefit 
cost. In accordance with IAS 19 (Revised 2011), the Company accounts for the contributions to the scheme as if it were a defined 
contribution scheme. Details of the Group’s pension plan can be found on pages 176 to 178.
The auditor’s remuneration for audit and other services is disclosed in note 4 to the Group accounts.
ii Profit attributable to members of the parent undertaking
As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has not presented its own profit and loss account. 
The loss dealt within the financial statements of the Company was £47.8 million (2023: £25.0 million). The employees of the 
Company are the Directors and the Company Secretary. Full disclosure of the Directors’ remuneration can be found on 
pages 124 to 143.
Financial statements
189
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Company financial statements continued
iii Fixed asset investments
Investment in 
joint ventures 
£m
Shares in 
subsidiary 
undertakings 
£m
Total  
£m
At 1 April 2023
0.1
1,240.8
1,240.9
Additions
–
11.0
11.0
Impairment
–
(11.2)
(11.2)
31 March 2024
0.1
1,240.6
1,240.7
Shares in subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures are carried at cost less any provision for impairment. The historical cost 
of the shares in subsidiary undertakings and joint ventures at 31 March 2024 was £1,240.7 million (2023: £1,240.9 million).
The subsidiaries of the Company at 31 March 2024 were:
Direct subsidiaries
The Company has a 100% interest in the ordinary share capital of the following entities:
Principal activity
Principal activity
Great Portland Estates Services 
Limited (00517550)
Property management
G.P.E. (St Thomas Street) Limited 
(05593274)
Property investment
Collin Estates Limited*  
(00349259)
Property investment
J.L.P. Investment Company Limited 
(00459857)
Property investment
Courtana Investments Limited 
(00764696)
Property investment
Knighton Estates Limited  
(00379493)
Property investment
G.P.E. (Bermondsey Street) Limited 
(05593239)
Property investment
Pontsarn Investments Limited 
(00611070)
Property investment
73/77 Oxford Street Limited 
(00628026)
Property investment
Portman Square Properties Holdings 
Limited (06049187)
Holding company
GPE (Brook Street) Limited* 
(09144095)
Property investment
GPE Pension Trustee Limited  
(05406955)
Corporate trustee
GPE (GHS) Limited*  
(08737134)
Property investment
G.P.E. (Marcol House) Limited 
(07046709)
Holding company
Gresse Street Limited*  
(05279893)
Property investment
G.P.E. (Rathbone Place 1) Limited 
(0774083)
Property investment
GPE (Dufour’s Place) Limited* 
(14078313)
Property investment
GPE St Andrew Street Limited* 
(14085827)
Property investment
GPE (Soho Square) Limited 
(15088898)
Property investment
GPE (Piccadilly) Limited  
(14832783)
Property investment
GPE (Bramah House) Limited* 
(14790117)
Property investment
GPE (135-141 Wardour Street) Limited* 
(14780172)
Property investment
G.P.E. Construction Limited* 
(04936146)
Development  
management
G.P.E. (Rathbone Place 2) Limited 
(07754121)
Property investment
The Rathbone Place Partnership  
(G.P. 1) Limited (07740829)
Property investment
G.P.E. (Rathbone Place 3) Limited 
(07754130)
Property investment
King Sloane Properties Limited 
(22867/OE027819)
Property investment
*	 Great Portland Estates plc has guaranteed the liabilities of these subsidiaries under section 479A and C of the Companies Act 2006 (as amended).  
As such, these subsidiaries will take advantage of the audit exemption set out within section 479A for the year ended 31 March 2024. 
190
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

iii Fixed asset investments continued
Indirect subsidiaries
Principal activity
Principal activity
The Rathbone Place Partnership  
(G.P. 2) Limited (07742507)
Property investment
Portman Square Properties Limited 
(03872261)
Property investment
The Rathbone Place Limited 
Partnership** (LP014603)
Property investment
G.P.E. (Newman Street) Limited* 
(07796204)
Property investment
Rathbone Square No. 1 Limited 
(04122795)
Property investment
Rathbone Square No.2 Limited 
(04122784)
Property investment
The Newman Street Unit Trust
Property investment
Marcol House Jersey Limited  
(95425)
Property investment
**	 The Group has taken advantage of the exemption, which is conferred by The Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008, for preparing financial statements  
for The Rathbone Place Limited Partnership.
Directly held joint venture entities
Principal activity
Principal activity
The Great Victoria Partnership  
(G.P.) Limited (05216728)
Property investment
The Great Victoria Partnership  
(G.P.) (No. 2) Limited (05375913)
Property investment
Great Ropemaker Partnership  
(G.P.) Limited (06526534)
Property investment
GHS (GP) Limited  
(114189)
Property investment
Indirectly held joint venture entities
Principal activity
Principal activity
Great Victoria Property Limited 
(05208609)
Property investment
The Great Victoria Partnership 
(LP009971)
Property investment
The Great Victoria Partnership (No. 2) 
(LP010380)
Property investment
Great Victoria Property (No. 2) Limited 
(05385912)
Property investment
Great Ropemaker Property Limited 
(06526552)
Property investment
The Great Ropemaker Partnership 
(LP012802)
Property investment
Great Ropemaker Property 
(Nominee 1) Limited (07830921)
Property investment
Great Ropemaker Property  
(Nominee 2) Limited (07830923)
Property investment
The GHS Limited Partnership  
(1697)
Property investment
GPE (Hanover Square) Limited 
(03723180)
Property investment
14 Brook Street Management 
Company Limited (12938268)
Property investment
GHS (Nominee) Limited  
(114197)
Property investment
All of the above companies are registered at 33 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PW and operate in England and Wales 
except for: Marcol House Jersey Limited, GHS (GP) Limited, GHS (Nominee) Limited and The GHS Limited Partnership, which are 
registered at 44 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey, JE4 9WG, The Newman Street Unit Trust, which is registered at 11 Old Jewry, London, 
EC2R 8DU and King Sloane Properties Limited, which is registered in One Welches, Welches, St. Thomas BB22025, Barbados. 
Great Portland Estates plc is the ultimate parent undertaking of the GPE Group.
Financial statements
191
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Notes forming part of the Company financial statements continued
iv Current liabilities
2024 
£m
2023  
£m
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings
1,017.6
1,014.0
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
175.0
–
Other creditors
–
1.0
Accruals
12.4
8.2
1,205.0
1,023.2
Interest on intercompany debt is charged at variable rates based on the weighted average interest rate of Group third-party debt. 
Amounts are unsecured and are repayable on demand.
v Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Bank loans
294.4
12.8
Debentures
22.0
22.0
Private placement notes
249.0
423.7
565.4
458.5
At 31 March 2024, property with a carrying value of £107.0 million (2023: £111.0 million) was secured under the first mortgage 
debenture stock. Further details of the Company’s loans and borrowings can be found on notes 16 and 17 of the Group accounts.
vi Deferred tax
1 April  
2023  
£m
Recognised in 
the income 
statement  
£m
Recognised  
in equity
£m
31 March  
2024  
£m
Net deferred tax asset in respect of other temporary differences
1.2
(1.2)
–
–
1.2
(1.2)
–
–
The Company has not recognised further deferred tax assets in respect of gross temporary differences arising from the 
following items, because it is uncertain whether future taxable profits will arise against which these assets can be utilised:
2024  
£m
2023  
£m
Revenue losses
30.7
15.7
Share-based payments
2.7
2.7
33.4
18.4
192
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

In this section:
194
Five-year record
195
Our properties and customers
197
Portfolio statistics
198
Glossary
201
Shareholders’ information
203
Financial calendar
Other  
information
(unaudited)
We are creating a lasting 
positive social impact in 
our communities
We know that the socially disadvantaged members of our communities will be 
the most impacted by climate change. We are therefore committed to supporting 
the people, and the communities, in which we work to have a better quality of life, 
whilst also supporting a thriving economy for London’s future.
Through the continued implementation of our Social Impact Strategy and by 
maintaining long-term community relationships, we are creating at least £10 million 
of social value by 2030 and disclosing our progress against this target annually.
Other information
193
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc

Based on the Group financial statements for the years ended 31 March
Balance sheet
2020
£m
2021
£m
2022
£m
2023
£m
2024
£m
Property portfolio
1,987.1
1,894.5
2,144.4
1,922.2
1,929.2
Joint ventures
647.0
626.4
582.8
538.8
491.3
Trading property
–
–
–
–
–
Loans and borrowings
(444.3)
(488.6)
(531.2)
(458.5)
(740.4)
Other assets/(liabilities)
13.3
(60.7)
(83.1)
(83.9)
(97.1)
Net assets
2,203.1
1,971.6
2,112.9
1,918.6
1,583.0
Financed by
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Issued share capital
38.7
38.7
38.7
38.7
38.7
Reserves
2,164.4
1,932.9
2,074.2
1,879.9
1,544.3
Total equity
2,203.1
1,971.6
2,112.9
1,918.6
1,583.0
Net assets per share
868p
779p
835p
757p
624p
EPRA NTA 
868p
779p
835p
757p
624p
Income statement
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Revenue
102.5
88.5
84.2
91.2
95.4
Cost of sales
(27.7)
(24.7)
(30.1)
(32.2)
(33.3)
74.8
63.8
54.1
59.0
62.1
Administration expenses
(29.0)
(25.2)
(35.0)
(38.3)
(42.3)
Estimated credit loss
(0.1)
(7.7)
(4.1)
(0.8)
(0.1)
Development management losses
(0.2)
(0.1)
(0.4)
(0.1)
–
Operating profit before (deficit)/surplus from property  
and results of joint ventures
45.5
30.8
14.6
19.8
19.7
(Deficit)/surplus on investment property
(52.6)
(156.8)
107.9
(145.0)
(267.3)
(Deficit)/surplus on revaluation of investments
–
–
–
0.1
(0.2)
Share of results of joint ventures
57.9
(76.2)
45.9
(33.4)
(46.7)
Operating (loss)/profit
50.8
(202.2)
168.4
(158.5)
(294.5)
Finance income
7.3
8.0
7.4
6.0
6.1
Finance costs
(6.5)
(7.8)
(9.1)
(11.5)
(17.7)
Fair value loss on derivatives
–
–
–
–
(1.7)
(Loss)/profit before tax
51.6
(202.0)
166.7
(164.0)
(307.8)
Tax
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.1
–
(Loss)/profit for the year
51.8
(201.9)
167.2
(163.9)
(307.8)
(Loss)/earnings per share – basic
20.0p
(79.8)p
66.1p
(64.8)p
(121.7)p
(Loss)/earnings per share – diluted
20.0p
(79.8)p
66.0p
(64.8)p
(121.7)p
EPRA earnings per share – diluted
22.0p
15.8p
10.8p
9.5p
7.1p
Dividend per share
12.6p
12.6p
12.6p
12.6p
12.6p
Five-year record
194
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Our properties and customers
In value order (GPE share)
Location
Tenure
Rent roll  
(GPE share)  
£
Net  
internal area  
sq ft
Ownership
Property name
£200 million plus
50%
Hanover Square
Rest of West End
FH/LH
12,501,400
220,500
100%
1 Newman Street & 70/88 Oxford Street
Noho
FH
11,257,600
122,700
£100 million – £200 million
100%
Wells & More
Noho
FH
5,358,500
122,200
100%
Elsley House
Noho
FH
4,105,600
65,000
100%
2 Aldermanbury Square 
Noho
FH
–
322,600
100%
Kent House
Noho
FH
6,183,100
59,300
£75 million – £100 million
100%
City Tower
City
LH
6,963,000
138,600
100%
Walmar House
Noho
LH
4,485,000
56,500
£50 million – £75 million
100%
Soho Square Estate
Rest of West End
FH
1,249,100
57,500
50%
200 & 214 Gray’s Inn Road
Midtown
LH
2,999,200
287,900
100%
Empire House 
Rest of West End
LH
4,333,900
45,700
100%
The Hickman
City
FH
4,202,500
74,900
100%
35 Portman Square
Noho
LH
5,483,900
73,400
100%
Carrington House, 126/130 Regent Street
Rest of West End
LH
3,178,200
30,900
100%
Woolyard
Southwark
FH
4,682,200
46,300
100%
New City Court, 14/20 St Thomas Street
Southwark
FH
3,811,800
98,000
100%
Egyptian & Dudley House
Rest of West End
LH
490,000
30,100
100%
Minerva House
Southwark
FH
85,500
166,800
£30 million – £50 million
100%
54/56 Jermyn Street
Rest of West End
LH
2,803,500
28,700
100%
French Railways House & 50 Jermyn Street
Rest of West End
LH
–
67,600
100%
48/54 Broadwick Street and 16 Dufour’s Place
Rest of West End
FH
3,909,700
24,500
100%
Challenger House
City
FH
2,439,200
59,200
100%
6 St Andrew Street
Midtown
FH
–
47,800
100%
31/34 Alfred Place
Noho
LH
532,200
41,700
100%
141 Wardour Street
Rest of West End
FH
–
33,700
50%
Mount Royal, 508/540 Oxford Street
Noho
LH
2,977,800
92,100
100%
Pollen House
Rest of West End
LH
2,725,500
21,300
£10 million – £30 million
100%
7/15 Gresse Street
Noho
LH
2,490,000
43,100
50%
103/113 Regent Street
Rest of West End
LH
2,466,600
56,900
100%
Orchard Court
Noho
LH
295,600
47,900
50%
Elm Yard
Midtown
FH
2,020,900
49,400
100%
Foxglove House
Rest of West End
LH
1,246,800
18,100
100%
95/96 New Bond Street
Rest of West End
LH
188,000
9,000
100%
Bramah House 
Southwark
FH
247,300
16,000
100%
Kingsland House, 122/124 Regent Street
Rest of West End
LH
970,300
8,700
Below £10 million
100%
Cathedral Street
Southbank
LH
332,000
6,400
100%
23/24 Newman Street
Noho
LH
7,900
25,200
100%
183/190 Tottenham Court Road
Noho
LH
438,400
12,000
FH = Freehold or Virtual Freehold.
LH = Leasehold.
195
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc
Other information

Top ten customers
Customer
Use
Rent roll  
(our share)  
£m
% of rent roll  
(our share)
1
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts LLP
Office
4.4
4.1
2
Runway East
Office
3.6
3.4
3
Glencore UK Limited
Office
3.1
2.9
4
Exane SA
Office
2.8
2.6
5
Richemont UK Limited
Office
2.7
2.5
6
Fashion Retail Academy
Office
2.5
2.3
7
Uniqlo
Retail
2.5
2.3
8
RBH Group
Hotel
2.4
2.2
9
New Look
Office
1.9
1.8
10
Synthesia 
Office
1.7
1.6
Total
27.6
25.7
Our properties and customers continued
196
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Rental income
Wholly-owned
Share of joint ventures
Rent roll  
£m
Reversionary  
potential  
£m
Rental  
values  
£m
Rent roll  
£m
Reversionary  
potential  
£m
Rental  
values  
£m
Total rental  
values  
£m
London
North of Oxford Street
Office
32.5
3.1
35.6
–
–
–
35.6
Retail
8.1
0.9
9.0
3.0
0.1
3.1
12.1
Rest of West End
Office
14.6
2.3
16.9
9.7
1.8
11.5
28.4
Retail
6.5
0.7
7.2
5.3
0.2
5.5
12.7
Total West End
61.7
7.0
68.7
18.0
2.1
20.1
88.8
City, Midtown and Southwark
Office
20.0
2.1
22.1
5.0
0.3
5.3
27.4
Retail
2.8
(0.7)
2.1
–
–
–
2.1
Total City, Midtown and Southwark
22.8
1.4
24.2
5.0
0.3
5.3
29.5
Total let portfolio
84.5
8.4
92.9
23.0
2.4
25.4
118.3
Voids (A)
2.7
–
2.7
Premises under refurbishment and development
89.0
4.5
93.5
Total portfolio (B)
184.6
29.9
214.5
Vacancy rate % (A/B)
1.5
–
1.3
EPRA vacancy
Wholly-
owned  
£m
Joint 
ventures  
£m
Total  
£m
Voids and premises under refurbishment excluding development (A)
42.5
4.5
47.0
Total portfolio 
184.6
29.9
214.5
Less: premises under development
(49.2)
–
(49.2)
Total (B)
135.4
29.9
165.3
EPRA vacancy rate % (A/B)
31.4
15.1
28.4
Rent roll security, lease lengths and voids
Wholly-owned
Joint ventures
Rent roll  
secure for  
five years  
% 
Weighted  
average  
lease length  
Years 
Void  
% 
Rent roll  
secure for 
five years  
% 
Weighted  
average  
lease length  
Years 
Void  
% 
London
North of Oxford Street
Office
34.2
4.2
1.2
–
–
–
Retail
48.4
5.6
2.0
–
1.7
–
Rest of West End
Office
0.7
1.6
0.7
89.1
11.3
–
Retail
19.8
4.0
1.2
30.7
5.3
–
Total West End
25.8
3.7
1.1
57.2
7.9
–
City, Midtown and Southwark
Office
13.9
2.6
2.0
–
1.6
–
Retail
11.3
2.2
–
–
–
–
Total City, Midtown and Southwark
13.6
2.5
2.0
–
1.6
–
Total portfolio
22.5
3.4
1.5
44.7
6.5
–
Rental values and yields
Wholly-owned
Joint ventures
Wholly-owned
Joint ventures
Average 
rent  
£psf
Average 
ERV  
£psf
Average 
rent  
£psf
Average 
ERV  
£psf
Initial  
yield  
%
True 
equivalent 
yield 
%
Initial  
yield  
%
True 
equivalent 
yield 
%
London
North of Oxford Street
Office
86
102
–
–
3.3
5.3
–
–
Retail
66
67
83
83
2.2
5.3
4.7
5.8
Rest of West End
Office
99
143
116
138
4.6
5.8
3.6
4.6
Retail
99
115
108
113
3.9
5.0
4.1
4.4
Total West End
86
106
107
113
3.5
5.4
3.9
4.8
City, Midtown and Southwark
Office
64
83
46
53
4.4
5.7
4.5
6.1
Retail
39
36
–
–
4.3
5.9
–
–
Total City, Midtown and Southwark
59
76
46
53
4.4
5.7
4.5
6.1
Total portfolio
77
91
83
84
3.7
5.4
4.0
5.1
Portfolio statistics at 31 March 2024
197
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc
Other information

Building Research Establishment Environmental 
Assessment Methodology (BREEAM)
Building Research Establishment method of assessing, 
rating and certifying the sustainability of buildings.
Cash EPS
EPRA EPS adjusted for certain non-cash items (including 
our share of joint ventures): lease incentives, capitalised 
interest and charges for share-based payments.
Core West End
Areas of London with W1 and SW1 postcodes.
Development profit on cost
The value of the development at completion, less the value 
of the land at the point of development commencement 
and costs to construct (including finance charges, 
letting fees, void costs and marketing expenses).
Development profit on cost %
The development profit on cost divided by the land 
value at the point of development commencement 
together with the costs to construct.
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Profit after tax divided by the weighted average 
number of ordinary shares in issue.
EPRA metrics
Standard calculation methods for adjusted EPS and NAV 
and other operating metrics as set out by the European 
Public Real Estate Association (EPRA) in their Best Practice 
and Policy Recommendations.
EPRA Net Disposal Value (NDV)
Represents the shareholders’ value under a disposal 
scenario, where deferred tax, financial instruments and 
certain other adjustments are calculated to the full extent 
of their liability, net of any resulting tax. Diluted net assets 
per share adjusted to remove the impact of goodwill 
arising as a result of deferred tax and fixed interest 
rate debt.
EPRA Net Reinstatement Value (NRV)
Represents the value of net assets on a long-term basis. 
Assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise 
in normal circumstances, such as the fair value movements 
on financial derivatives, real estate transfer taxes and 
deferred taxes on property valuation surpluses, are 
therefore excluded.
EPRA Net Tangible Assets (NTA)
Assumes that entities buy and sell assets, thereby 
crystallising certain levels of unavoidable deferred 
tax. Diluted net assets per share adjusted to remove 
the cumulative fair value movements on interest-rate 
swaps and similar instruments, the carrying value of 
goodwill arising as a result of deferred tax and other 
intangible assets.
Estimated rental value (ERV)
The market rental value of lettable space as estimated 
by the Group’s valuers at each balance sheet date.
Fair value – investment property
The amount as estimated by the Group’s valuers 
for which a property should exchange on the date of 
valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an 
arm’s-length transaction after proper marketing wherein 
the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently 
and without compulsion. In line with market practice, 
values are stated net of purchasers’ costs.
Ready to fit
For businesses typically taking larger spaces on longer 
leases who want to fit out the space themselves.
Fitted spaces
Where businesses can move into fully furnished, well 
designed workspaces, with their own front door, furniture, 
meeting rooms, kitchen and branding.
Fully Managed
Fitted space where GPE handles all day-to-day services 
and running of the workplace in one monthly bill.
Flex space partnerships
Revenue share agreements with flexible space operators; 
these are typically structured via lease arrangements 
with the revenue share recognised within rental income.
Full repairing and Insuring (FRI) lease
In an FRI lease, the customer is responsible for managing 
the space they occupy, including all costs associated 
with repairing and maintaining the property, as well as 
obtaining insurance coverage.
IFRS
United Kingdom adopted international 
accounting standards.
Internal rate of return (IRR)
The rate of return that if used as a discount rate and 
applied to the projected cash flows that would result 
in a net present value of zero.
Glossary
198
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Like-for-like (Lfl)
The element of the portfolio that has been held for the 
whole of the period of account.
MSCI
Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) is a 
company that produces an independent benchmark 
of property returns.
EPRA Loan-to-Value (LTV)
The nominal value of total bank loans, private placement 
notes, debenture stock and any net liabilities/assets, 
net of cash (including our share of joint ventures balances), 
expressed as a percentage of the market value of the 
property portfolio (including our share of joint ventures).
MSCI central London
An index, compiled by MSCI, of the central and inner 
London properties in their March annual valued universes.
Net assets per share or net asset value (NAV)
Equity shareholders’ funds divided by the number 
of ordinary shares at the balance sheet date.
Net debt
The book value of the Group’s bank and loan facilities, 
private placement notes and debenture loans plus the 
nominal value of the convertible bond less cash and 
cash equivalents.
Net gearing
Total Group borrowings at nominal value plus obligations 
under occupational leases less short-term deposits 
and cash as a percentage of equity shareholders’ funds 
adjusted for value of the Group’s pension scheme, 
calculated in accordance with our bank covenants.
Net initial yield
Annual net rents on investment properties as a percentage 
of the investment property valuation having added 
notional purchasers’ costs.
Net rental income
Gross rental income adjusted for the spreading of lease 
incentives less expected credit losses for rental income 
and ground rents.
Non-PIDs
Dividends from profits of the Group’s taxable 
residual business.
Property costs
Service charge and Fully Managed services income less 
service charge expenses, Fully Managed services cost, 
other property expenses and expected credit losses 
for service charges.
Property Income Distributions (PIDs)
Dividends from profits of the Group’s tax-exempt 
property rental business.
PMI
Purchasing Managers Index.
REIT
UK Real Estate Investment Trust.
Rent roll
The annual contracted rental income.
Reversionary potential
The percentage by which ERV exceeds rent roll on 
let space.
Topped-up initial yield
Annual net rents on investment properties as a percentage 
of the investment property valuation having added 
notional purchasers’ costs and contracted uplifts from 
tenant incentives.
Total potential future growth
Portfolio rent roll plus the ERV of void space, space under 
refurbishment and the committed development schemes, 
expressed as a percentage uplift on the rent roll at the 
end of the period. 
Total Accounting Return (TAR)
The growth in EPRA NTA per share plus ordinary dividends 
paid, expressed as a percentage of EPRA NTA per share 
at the beginning of the period.
Total Property Return (TPR)
Capital growth in the portfolio plus net rental income 
derived from holding these properties plus profit on sale 
of disposals expressed as a percentage return on the 
period’s opening value.
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
The growth in the ordinary share price as quoted on the 
London Stock Exchange, plus dividends per share received 
for the period expressed as a percentage of the share 
price at the beginning of the period.
199
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc
Other information

True equivalent yield
The constant capitalisation rate which, if applied to all 
cash flows from an investment property, including current 
rent, reversions to current market rent and such items 
as voids and expenditures, equates to the market value 
having taken into account notional purchasers’ costs. 
Assumes rent is received quarterly in advance.
Ungeared IRR
The ungeared internal rate of return (IRR) is the interest 
rate at which the net present value of all the cash flows 
(both positive and negative) from a project or investment 
equal zero, without the benefit of financing. The internal 
rate of return is used to evaluate the attractiveness of 
a project or investment.
EPRA vacancy rate
The element of a property which is unoccupied, expressed 
as the ERV of the vacant space divided by the ERV of the 
total portfolio, excluding committed developments.
Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term (WAULT)
The Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term expressed 
in years.
Whole life surplus
The value of the development at completion, less the 
value of the land at the point of acquisition and costs 
to construct (including finance charges, letting fees, 
void costs and marketing expenses), plus any income 
earned over the period.
Glossary continued
200
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Shareholder enquiries
Enquiries relating to shareholdings, such as the transfer 
of shares, change of name or address, lost share certificates 
or dividend cheques, should be referred to the Company’s 
Registrar at:
Equiniti Limited  
Aspect House  
Spencer Road  
Lancing  
West Sussex  
BN99 6DA
Tel: +44 (0) 371 384 2030  
(Lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, 
excluding bank holidays in England and Wales).
See help.shareview.co.uk for additional information.
Managing your shares online
Shareholders and employees can manage their 
Great Portland Estates plc holdings online by registering 
with Shareview, a secure online platform provided by 
Equiniti Limited. Registration is a straightforward process 
and allows shareholders to:
	
– access information on their shareholdings, including 
share balance and dividend information;
	
– sign up for electronic shareholder communications;
	
– buy and sell shares;
	
– update their records following a change of address;
	
– have dividends paid into their bank account; and
	
– vote by proxy online in advance of general meetings 
of the Company.
Electronic communication
Shareholders are encouraged to elect to receive all 
shareholder documentation electronically by registering  
with Shareview at www.shareview.co.uk. Shareholders  
who have registered for this option will receive an email 
notification when shareholder documents are available 
on the Company’s website and a link will be provided 
to that information.
When registering, shareholders will need their shareholder 
reference number, which can be found on their share 
certificate or proxy form.
Equiniti Limited offers a range of shareholder information 
and services online at www.shareview.co.uk
For deaf and speech impaired customers, Equiniti welcomes 
calls via Relay UK. Please see www.relayuk.bt.com for 
more information.
Unsolicited telephone calls – boiler room scams
In recent years, some of our shareholders have received 
unsolicited telephone calls or correspondence concerning 
investment matters from organisations or persons 
claiming or implying that they have some connection 
with the Company.
These are typically from overseas based ‘brokers’ who target 
UK shareholders offering to sell them shares that often turn 
out to be worthless or non-existent, or an inflated price for 
shares they own. These operations are commonly known as 
‘boiler rooms’. Shareholders are advised to be very wary of 
any offers of unsolicited advice, discounted shares, premium 
prices for shares they own or free reports into the Company. 
If you receive any unsolicited investment advice:
	
– ensure you get the correct name of the person and firm;
	
– check that the firm is on the Financial Conduct Authority 
(FCA) Register to ensure they are authorised at  
https://register.fca.org.uk;
	
– use the details on the FCA Register to contact the firm;
	
– call the FCA Consumer Helpline (0800 111 6768) if there 
are no contact details in the Register or you are told 
they are out of date; and
	
– if the calls persist, hang up.
If you use an unauthorised firm to buy or sell shares, you will 
not have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the 
Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
Dividends
Dividends can be paid by BACS directly into a UK bank 
account, with the dividend confirmation being sent to the 
shareholder’s address. This is the easiest way for shareholders 
to receive dividend payments and avoids the risk of lost or 
out-of-date cheques. A dividend mandate form is available 
from Equiniti Limited or online at www.shareview.co.uk/info/
directdividends
Dividends payable in foreign currencies
Equiniti is able to pay dividends to shareholder bank accounts 
in over 83 currencies worldwide through the Overseas Payment 
Service. An administrative fee will be deducted from each 
dividend payment. Further details can be obtained from 
Equiniti or online at www.shareview.co.uk/info/ops
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Our Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) enables shareholders 
to use their dividends to buy further Great Portland Estates plc 
shares. Full details of the DRIP can be obtained from Equiniti 
Limited or online at www.shareview.co.uk/info/drip
Shareholders’ information
201
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc
Other information

Shareholders’ information continued
Tax consequences of REIT status
As a REIT, dividend payments may be split between PIDs and 
non-PIDs. Information in respect of the tax consequences 
for shareholders of receiving dividends can be found on 
the Company’s website at www.gpe.co.uk/investors/
shareholder-information/reits
Share dealing
Great Portland Estates plc shares can be traded through 
most banks, building societies or stockbrokers. Equiniti Limited 
offers a telephone and internet dealing service. Terms and 
conditions and details of the commission charges are 
available on request.
For telephone dealing, please telephone 0345 603 7037 
between 8.00am and 4.30pm, Monday to Friday (excluding 
bank holidays in England and Wales), and for internet dealing 
visit www.shareview.co.uk/dealing
Shareholders will need their reference number, which can 
be found on their share certificate.
Website
The Company has a corporate website, which holds, amongst 
other information, a copy of our latest Annual Report and 
financial statements, a list of properties held by the Group 
and copies of all press announcements released over the 
last 12 months. The site can be found at www.gpe.co.uk
General Counsel & Company Secretary
Darren Lennark
Registered office  
33 Cavendish Square  
London W1G 0PW  
Tel: 020 7647 3000  
Registered number: 596137
202
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

2024
30 May
Ex-dividend date for 2023/24 final dividend
31 May
Registration qualifying date for 2023/24 final dividend
4 July
Annual General Meeting­
8 July
2023/24 final dividend payable
14 November
Announcement of 2024/25 interim results (provisional)
21 November
Ex-dividend date for 2024/25 interim dividend (provisional)1
22 November
Registration qualifying date for 2024/25  
interim dividend (provisional)1
2025
3 January
2024/25 interim dividend payable (provisional)1­
21 May
Announcement of 2024/25 full-year results (provisional)1, 2
1.	 Provisional dates will be confirmed in the half-year results 
announcement 2025. All dividends are subject to the Board’s 
recommendation (and also, in the case of the final dividend, 
to shareholder approval) at the appropriate time.
2.	 The timetable for the potential final dividend will be confirmed  
in the 2025 Annual Report.
Financial calendar
203
Annual Report 2024  Great Portland Estates plc
Other information

204
Great Portland Estates plc  Annual Report 2024

Design and production by Radley Yeldar | ry.com
Key photography by Edward Hill, Steve Bates, 
and Andy Wilson.
Printed by Pureprint Group, using 
pureprint environmental print technology, 
a CarbonNeutral® company certified to 
FSC® and IS0 14001.
This Annual Report is printed on TREE FREE 
and uses 25% cotton linters and 75% bamboo. 
Both are renewable annual crops which yield 
high quality fibres giving a smooth, natural 
and soft to the touch finish to the paper and 
high performance in printing.
To complete the story of sustainability 
it is recyclable, biodegradable and made 
using EKOenergy from our own hydroelectric 
power station. The emissions generated 
during production of this eco-friendly paper 
are fully offset through Carbon Credits used 
to finance activities that can absorb CO2 
in the atmosphere.
Needless to say Tree Free carries the FSC® 
certification, even though like the name 
implies it has no impact on forests. 
If after reading, you no longer wish to 
retain this report, please pass it on to other 
interested readers or dispose of it in your 
recycled paper waste.
For more information on how we are working to  
decarbonise our business, please visit our website:
www.gpe.co.uk/sustainability

Great Portland Estates plc  
33 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0PW 
Tel: 020 7647 3000
www.gpe.co.uk