Green Brick Partners
Annual Report 2019

Plain-text annual report

201 9 ANNUAL REPORT IMPORTANT INFORMATION Trophy Signature Homes, Edgestone at Legacy Frisco, TX This annual report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements concern expectations, beliefs, projections, plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts, and they are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors. See the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 50 of this annual report for more information. This annual report also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, including pre-tax return on average invested capital, compounded annual growth of pre-tax earnings, and certain GAAP measures adjusted for the impact of the Tax Act. For more information on why we use these measures and for a reconciliation of these measures to their most comparable GAAP measures, see the section entitled “Appendix & Non-GAAP Reconciliation” on page 28 of this annual report. CONTACTS Green Brick Partners Investor Relations Anthony England, CPA Manager of Financial Analysis aengland@greenbrickpartners.com Mailing Address 2805 Dallas Pkwy Suite 400 Plano, TX 75093 Audit, RSM US LLP Mailing Address 13155 Noel Road Suite 2200 Dallas, TX 75240 Transfer Agent, Broadridge Financial Solutions Mailing Address 51 Mercedes Way Edgewood, NY 11717 2 Media Relations Shalott Cecchini Marketing Manager scecchini@greenbrickpartners.com Website www.greenbrickpartners.com Website www.rsmus.com Website www.broadridge.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 6 10 12 14 Letter from the CEO and Chairman Financial highlights Company culture & values Land development Our brands 24 28 30 32 20 Quarter financial summary Appendix & non-GAAP reconciliation Board of Directors Operating results & Form 10K Centre Living Homes, Winnetka Estates & Bungalows Dallas, TX 3 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS 2019 represented another significant year for Green Brick Partners, Inc. and our subsidiary Team Builders. This past year our award-winning homes and neighborhoods, eight Team Builder brands, and financial service operations produced record revenues of $759.8M up 31.3% from the prior year, record pre-tax income of $78.4M up 14.3% from the prior year, and record earnings per share of $1.16 up 13.7% from the prior year. Building a better HOME Though each of our Team Builders is locally branded, managed, and unique in the locations, architecture, and price-point of homes they build, all of our Team Builders are united by Green Brick Partners’ common set of values we call HOME. Our Team Builders are expected to uphold our values of Honesty, Objectivity, Maturity, and Efficiency in everything they do. Fortune Magazine recognized our significant growth by awarding us a top 100 rank in their list of 100 fastest growing companies in the world. Where many would see this as a reason for pause and celebration, this public acknowledgment of our success inspires us to work even harder, smarter, and more efficiently. Despite times of uncertainty due to COVID-19, we entered 2020 with a record backlog of $346.8M as of 12.31.2019, up 31.2% over the prior year, and record sales in January and February 2020, which we believe has positioned us for continued success. Risk and Capital Discipline We strive to balance high growth with low risk. Our 31.3% debt to capital ratio makes us one of the least leveraged balance sheets of any public builder. The credit markets have noticed. In August, we obtained an unsecured $75 million, seven-year term loan at a 4.00% interest rate; a rate only slightly higher than the long-term rates paid by the lower-leveraged large-cap builders, and more attractive than the long-term rates paid by all small-cap and all mid-cap builders at the time of placement in August 2019. This transaction represented another positive step in Green Brick Partners’ long- term balance sheet strategy by laddering debt maturities, locking in long- term borrowings at attractive rates, enabling us to have additional financial flexibility, and partnering with a world-class organization in Prudential Private Capital. Low cost debt enables us to retain more profits to fund even faster future growth. We are striving to deliver the best risk-adjusted returns in the industry. Subsidiary Team Builders Each of our Team Builders holds a strategic and market niche advantage in its local market. During the year, we continued to significantly enhance the operating capabilities and efficiency in each of our eight brands. In 2019, we entered the first-time and value proposition home buyer market with Trophy Signature Homes in Dallas and Fort Worth. We believe that expanding into high-demand markets will strategically position Trophy Signature Homes for accelerated growth off a low base. 4 For more information on HOME, we encourage you to review our chapter on company culture and values found later in this book. Conclusion As we approach $1 billion in annual revenue, we are confident our shareholders should continue to see the benefits of the synergistic integration of our culture with operating scale. Thank you for being a shareholder, stakeholder, and for your interest in Green Brick Partners. We look forward to keeping you updated on our developments in the coming years and appreciate your support. James R. Brickman CEO and Co-Founder Green Brick Partners David Einhorn Chairman and Co-Founder Green Brick Partners GHO Homes, Venezia Estates Vero Beach, FL OUR BRANDS Team Builder Market The Providence Group of Georgia Atlanta, GA Products Offered Price Range Townhomes Condominiums Single Family $320k - $690k $380k - $580k $340k - $1.01M CB JENI Homes Dallas, TX Townhomes $230k - $480k Normandy Homes Dallas, TX Single Family $330k - $760k Southgate Homes Dallas, TX Luxury Homes $500k - $1.06M GHO Homes Vero Beach, FL Treasure Coast, FL Single Family Patio Homes $250k - $750k $200k - $400k Centre Living Homes Dallas, TX Townhomes Single Family $340k - $550k $390k - $850k Trophy Signature Homes Dallas, TX Single Family $240k - $560k Challenger Homes* Colorado Springs, CO Townhomes Patio Homes Single Family $240k - $310k $315k - $385k $225k - $600k * 49.9% ownership with contractual pathway to control 5 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS $1.16 $1.02 4,734 5,189 6,219 8,976 8,078 $791.7 $623.6 $458.3 $391.0 $298.8 $0.68 $0.49 $0.38 2015 2016 2017(1)* 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Basic EPS Lots Owned & Controlled Total Revenues (in millions) * 2017 Basic EPS has been normalized to adjust for the impact of the Tax Act. See appendix. CB JENI Homes, Apple’s Crossing Fairview, TX 6 $78.4 $68.6 $53.9 $39.0 $24.4 95 76 50 55 43 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Pre-Tax Income Attributable to GRBK (in millions) Active Selling Communities Southgate Homes, Brockdale Estates Lucas, TX GREEN BRICK AT A GLANCE $791.7M 2019 company revenue of $791.7 million (+72.8% over 2017) $78.4M 2019 pre-tax income of $78.4M(2) (+45.5% over 2017) 31.3% 2019 debt to total capitalization ratio 33.9% Compounded Annual Growth of GRBK Pre-Tax Earnings(2) 7 HOMEBUYER DIVERSIFICATION Customer Diversification in Texas, Georgia, and Florida Markets In addition to managing risk by diversifying the markets where we operate, our diverse homebuyer customer mix has allowed for us to grow even in periods of more modest growth in specific product types. In 2019 we continued our diversification efforts by expanding our Age Targeted product to Georgia and Texas, a product previously only offered in Florida. We further expanded upon this strategy in 2019 through the launch of an entry-level product line with Trophy Signature Homes in Texas. Our strategy to improve diversification has contributed to a 31% YOY growth in home closings revenue from 2018 to 2019. 2% 13% 39% 46% 73% growth over 2 years 5% 15% 32% 19% 29% $435.6m 2017 Home Closings $752.3m 2019 Home Closings Suburban townhouse Single-family second time plus move-up Single-family first time move-up Age-targeted Urban 8 Southgate Homes, Edgewood Frisco, TX 9 COMPANY CULTURE & VALUES Mission Statement Our mission is to expand our business by combining our strong financial resources with our Team Builder brands in locations across the country who have deep relationships in the communities where they live and build. Company Culture Our business model is founded on the belief that locally-focused land development is the starting point for a builders’ profitability and that both homebuilding and land development are best executed on a decentralized basis. To really succeed, a builder/developer needs a track record of creating award- winning neighborhoods and decades of building superior local, political, and subcontractor relationships. Green Brick and our group of controlled builders, known as Team Builders, have outstanding local relationships in land development and are recognized by homebuyers and by our industry for our award-winning neighborhoods and homes. Our Team Builders have typically worked decades to build their reputations, establish brand recognition, and cultivate critical realtor and customer The Providence Group, Idylwilde Canton, GA relationships. We work tirelessly to preserve our Team Builders’ unique local branding and make every effort to retain key employees. These steps help ensure builder success and increase returns. We differentiate ourselves with low leverage and a strong capital base which we deploy with discipline. At the same time, we create value and strengthen our Team Builders through our GRBK- managed standardized financial and integrated operating system. This system allows comprehensive real-time visibility to enable our Team Builders to grow their business with access to state-of-the-art real-time data. We only seek local partnerships or 100% ownership with Team Builders of upstanding character who operate with the highest integrity. Notably, these Team Builders share Green Brick’s values and take the “long view” in seeking to maximize economic returns. We make a point not to run our business like our public peers, where success is measured by quarterly GAAP results that can distort the true value and economic results of the business. We believe this often causes issues including huge employee turnover at the division level, lower customer satisfaction, and lower realized returns in the long run. Much of our success can be attributed to this “long view” approach. 10 Core Values Our core values guide our business and are instrumental in building a better HOME. While each of our Team Builders are locally branded, managed, and unique in their locations, architecture, and price point of homes they build, all our Team Builders are united by Green Brick Partners’ common set of values we call HOME. Honesty: Honesty and integrity are the foundation of any lasting business, and we strive each day to treat our customers, employees, and shareholders as we would like to be treated. Objectivity: Objectivity drives our business practices, and our decisions are always made on best practices and market-driven information available. Maturity: The emotional intelligence of our staff is integral to our success. In order to accomplish our common goals, we must be solution driven and view every challenge as an opportunity. Emotionally intelligent employees see the bigger picture and strive each day to work collaboratively toward a shared story of success. is the Efficiency: Efficiency result of competent, hard-working people who perform with a competitive spirit to produce rapid and consistent results. We continually evaluate our processes and systems to ensure that we remain the most efficient in our industry. Southgate Homes, NorthGlen Haslet, TX 11 LAND DEVELOPMENT The Green Brick Difference We manage land risk through rigorous local and centralized underwriting and provide our Team Builders centralized state-of-the-art operational support in IT systems, accounting, operational systems, national purchasing, marketing analytics, and human resource management. However, daily operations and construction decisions remain in the hands of our Team Builder brands. Our ultimate goal is to build neighborhoods with timeless, classic architecture interwoven with the latest technological advancements that provide superior long- term returns for our investors, stakeholders, residents, and cities where we build. Our Team Builders have typically worked decades to build their reputations, establish brand recognition, and cultivate critical realtor and customer relationships. The Providence Group, Bellmoore Park Johns Creek , GA 12 Trophy Signature Homes, Park West Frisco, TX 13 OUR BRANDS The Team Builders The Green Brick Partners Team Builder network is composed of seven consolidated homebuilders and one homebuilder with a 49.9% ownership interest. By preserving our builders’ unique brands and working hard to retain key employees, we have been able to ensure builder success and increase returns. in product Though diverse type and branding, our Team Builders share a steadfast commitment to quality construction and unmatched customer service. Every Team Builder is required to participate in Eliant, a leader in customer experience management, ensuring consistent quality control and happy homebuyers. Our Team Builders build in the largest markets in the country including Dallas, Texas and Atlanta Georgia, and in some of the fastest growing markets including Vero Beach, Florida, the Florida Treasure Coast, and Colorado Springs, Colorado. Financial Services In addition to independently branded Team Builders, Green Brick Partners retains 100% ownership in Green Brick Title and 49% ownership in Green Brick Mortgage. 14 CB JENI Homes, Heritage Creekside Plano, TX CB JENI HOMES About CB JENI Homes Since 2009, CB JENI Homes has proudly built new townhomes in premium Dallas-Fort Worth locations for lifestyle-conscious homebuyers. CB JENI Homes, now part of the Green Brick Partners Team Builders, was founded to provide new home options for an under-served portion of the market: those looking to buy moderately-sized homes (whether first-timers or those moving down), with beautiful architecture, low maintenance, and a level of service and professionalism that puts them at ease. Over the last 10 years, CB JENI has grown to become DFW’s largest townhome builder, both in number of neighborhoods and homes sold. CB JENI townhomes lead the way in quality, amassing numerous awards each year. The CB JENI Homes leadership team boasts more than 200 years of combined homebuilding experience, expertise that is passed along to every individual customer. CB JENI Homes is currently selling in 19 communities across the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Strategic Advantages Premier lot position and substantial market share of the townhome market in Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. CB JENI Homes, Apple’s Crossing Fairview, TX CB JENI Homes, Heritage Creekside Plano, TX CB JENI Homes, Terraces of Las Colinas Irving, TX 15 THE PROVIDENCE GROUP OF GEORGIA About The Providence Group of Georgia The Providence Group of Georgia has been one of Atlanta’s most respected names in homebuilding for decades. The company’s successor joined the Green Brick Partners family of Team Builders in 2011 and has continued to build the quality homes that cemented its hometown legacy. Known for well-crafted new homes with a personal touch, the company takes pride in creating places where people can make space for life and feel right at home. The Providence Group is considered to be the leading lifestyle builder in Atlanta, offering a variety of home styles including single-family homes, townhomes, and mid-rise condominiums. From the first road to the last trim detail, The Providence Group is committed to providing its buyers a best- in-class experience that has been recognized across Atlanta through numerous awards. In 2019, The Providence Group received an astonishing 15 OBIE awards, presented by the Greater Atlanta Home Builders Association, for their superior designs, merchandising, and innovative sales centers. Strategic Advantages The Providence Group has the ability to entitle, develop, and build complex infill neighborhoods. Currently, 65% of their lots are owned. Additionally, in 2020 they intend to expand their product range by entering the age-targeted market. 16 The Providence Group, Idylwilde Canton, GA The Providence Group, Pratt Stacks Atlanta, GA The Providence Group, The Views on Ponce Atlanta, GA Southgate Homes, The Grove Frisco, TX Southgagte Homes, NorthGlen Haslet, TX The Providence Group, The Views on Ponce Atlanta, GA Southgate Homes, 5T Ranch Argyle, TX SOUTHGATE HOMES About Southgate Homes Founded in 2012, award-winning Southgate Homes is recognized as one of the top luxury production home builders in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. When you see a Southgate home, the difference is clear - the Southgate commitment to design and quality is represented inside and out in each of their homes. The builder’s proven formula of setting high standards for each of the five key home building elements - desirable communities, unsurpassed architecture and design, desirable floor plans, stylish home features, and quality construction - has made them a premier DFW luxury production home builder. Much of their success has come from combining local homebuilding expertise with the strong financial resources of Green Brick Partners. This unique position has allowed the builder to maintain nimbleness in designs while leveraging the financial strength and superior lot positions across the metroplex that come from a national, publicly traded parent company. Southgate’s boutique approach to home building offers customizable floor plans, authentic architecture, generous standard home features, and upgrade options to individualize the look and feel of every home. Strategic Advantages Delivering competitive pricing on award-winning semi- custom homes at value production pricing. 17 CENTRE LIVING HOMES About Centre Living Homes Founded in 2012, Centre Living Homes is a premier DFW residential urban infill builder dedicated to quality, solid state-of-the-art construction, excellent craftsmanship, modern features, and service beyond the sale. Their high-density housing developments boast world- class architecture, the latest in smart home technology, and rooftop decks with some of Dallas’ most coveted views of the city. Much of the builder’s success can be attributed to their unique modern aesthetic that has resonated strongly with buyers seeking uncompromising luxury and style in centrally located neighborhoods. Since inception, Centre Living Homes has been the recipient of various Dallas Builders Association McSAM awards including the 2019 award for Best Architectural Design, and the 2019 award for Best Design Series for their Residences at CityLine community. Strategic Advantages Skilled in developing lots and building urban, high- density homes in complex infill communities. Centre Living Homes, Winnetka Estates & Bungalows Dallas, TX Centre Living Homes, Swiss Avenue Crossing Dallas, TX Centre Living Homes, Residences at CityLine Richardson, TX 18 Trophy Signature Homes, Ventana Fort Worth, TX Centre Living Homes, Swiss Avenue Crossing Dallas, TX TROPHY SIGNATURE HOMES About Trophy Signature Homes Trophy Signature Homes was founded in 2018 to serve the Dallas-Fort Worth market’s ever-growing need for quality, affordable homes. Every Trophy Signature Home offers a unique blend of functionality, design, and value. This translates into thoughtfully designed communities, state-of-the-art technology, and contemporary floor plans and designs at affordable prices. Despite being Green Brick Partners’ newest addition to its Team Builder network, in its first year of inception Trophy Signature Homes developed 11 product lines, started six models, and, by the end of their first year, was actively selling in 10 communities across DFW. The builder currently owns or controls nearly 3,000 lots in Dallas and Fort Worth. Trophy Signature Homes offers unique designs with entry level homes priced as low as $240,000 to more luxurious first time move up products currently priced in excess of $550,000. Strategic Advantages Offering a wide range of products fit for first time and move up buyers. Skilled in constructing value-oriented homes with a streamlined process. Trophy Signature Homes, Hollyhock Frisco, TX Trophy Signature Homes, Ventana Fort Worth, TX Trophy Signature Homes, Edgestone at Legacy Frisco, TX 19 NORMANDY HOMES About Normandy Homes Normandy Homes has been acknowledged through numerous awards as one of Dallas’ leading single family boutique home builders. Each Normandy home is crafted with the discerning homebuyer in mind, offering upscale homes with finely-crafted architecture, stylish finishes, and superior construction. In 2019 Normandy Homes expanded their product line with the introduction of their Legends Series of homes, an age-restricted product currently offered in Allen, Texas. The one and two-story collection of homes was designed for the active-adult community in mind with an emphasis on low maintenance living, sleek designs, and energy efficiency. Upon completion, the age-restricted community will boast 200 homes and a variety of resort-style amenities including pickleball courts and a fitness studio along with a multitude of classes and events led by the onsite lifestyle director. Strategic Advantages Unbeatable lot position and value in some of Dallas- Fort Worth’s most desirable neighborhoods. Normandy Homes, Apple’s Crossing Fairview, TX 20 Normandy Homes, Villas at Southgate Flower Mound, TX Normandy Homes, Viridian Arlington, TX GHO Homes, Summer Lake North Vero Beach, FL GHO Homes, Venezia Estates Vero Beach, FL GHO Homes, Orchid Cove Vero Beach, FL GHO HOMES About GHO Homes GHO Homes proudly boasts a distinctive and diverse floor plan collection that has consistently won awards and accolades over three decades for townhome, single-family, and custom estate home design. In April of 2018, Green Brick Partners acquired the assets of GHO homes and continued the GHO tradition in a newly formed GHO LLC. As with all other Green Brick Team Builders, the company infrastructure and building production style that have made GHO so successful remained in place during the transition. GHO Homes has continued to raise the bar through the creation of the GHO Tailor-Made program. This program sets GHO apart from it’s competitors by allowing home buyers to customize their homes with numerous plan options, built-ins, and upgrades that exceed industry standards and result in custom, one-of-a-kind homes at an outstanding value. This program has proven to be a resounding success with buyers choosing to purchase a GHO home in large part due to the flexibility of their plan options. Strategic Advantages Offering a large array of customizable plans that cater to move-down and active adult buyers. 21 CHALLENGER HOMES About Challenger Homes Over the last 20 years, Challenger Homes has grown from just one home site into one of Colorado’s most trusted new home builders. Thanks to strong core values and an unwavering commitment to their homebuyers, associates, trade partners, and communities, the company strives to be Making Lives Better for decades to come. Challenger Homes joined the Green Brick Partners Team Builder family in 2017. During the acquisition, Green Brick issued 1,497,000 new shares and, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired a 49.9% ownership of Challenger Homes through an investment in a newly formed entity, GB Challenger, LLC. Strategic Advantages Located in Colorado Springs, one of Forbes’ “10 Hottest Real Estate Markets to Watch”, Challenger Homes is skilled in building value-rich homes catering to first- time buyers, move-up buyers, and military families. Due to overwhelming success, Challenger Homes has announced an expansion into the Denver area. 22 Challenger Homes, Branding Iron at Sterling Ranch Colorado Springs, CO Challenger Homes, Branding Iron at Sterling Ranch Colorado Springs, CO Challenger Homes, Revel @ Wolf Ranch Colorado Springs, CO CB JENI Homes, Vista Del Lago Lewisville, TX Challenger Homes, Revel @ Wolf Ranch Colorado Springs, CO GREEN BRICK MORTGAGE About Green Brick Mortgage* Much like our Team Builders have a reputation of delivering beautifully designed homes and unparalleled customer service, Green Brick Mortgage delivers the same level of excellence by providing our buyers with best-in-class home financing services and expertise. The company offers the powerful tools, resources, and advice our buyers need for the best home buying experience possible. Our homebuyers are currently able to finance their homes through Green Brick Mortgage’s preferred lender referral program in Dallas, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia. GREEN BRICK TITLE About Green Brick Title Green Brick Title provides outstanding depth of experience to the residential and commercial real estate industry in four locations across the country. In addition to partnering with our Team Builders to help new homeowners quickly and efficiently close on their new homes, Green Brick Title works closely with realtors, banks, land brokers, builders, developers, and mortgage companies. As part of the Green Brick Partners family, Green Brick Title’s access to resources beyond those of a traditional title company enables us to always stay one step ahead of our competition. *Green Brick Partners owns a 49% equity interest in Green Brick Mortgage LLC. 23 GRBK 20 QUARTER FINANCIAL SUMMARY (4) Summary Consolidated Statement of Income Data for Quarter Ended December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 Total revenues $230,122 $209,404 $183,506 $168,628 Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Income tax provision attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc.(2) Basic EPS Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding 15,920 4,959 20,879 $0.32 50,429 15,671 5,743 21,414 $0.31 50,475 14,460 5,216 19,676 $0.29 50,655 12,605 3,794 16,399 $0.25 50,563 Summary Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 Inventory Total assets Borrowings on lines of credit, net Senior unsecured notes, net Notes payable Term loan facility Total debt Total liabilities Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity Noncontrolling interests Total equity Number of shares outstanding Book value per share Total invested capital Pre-tax return on average invested capital (3) Home Data for Quarter Ended New homes delivered Net new home orders Home Data as of Backlog, units Backlog, $ in millions Units under construction Active communities as of Lots owned Lots controlled Lots owned and controlled 24 $753,567 $740,799 875,539 164,642 73,406 238,048 325,533 523,168 13,227 536,395 50,488 761,216 11.0% 865,789 164,792 73,358 - 238,150 337,087 508,715 7,778 516,493 50,488 746,865 10.6% $719,878 832,961 232,657 - - 232,657 321,809 493,470 5,173 498,643 50,696 726,127 10.5% $690,817 793,020 206,522 - - 206,522 297,068 480,869 4,788 485,657 50,676 687,391 11.2% December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 514 590 443 436 394 453 368 444 December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 786 $346.8 1,297 95 6,419 2,557 8,976 710 $319.7 1,306 85 6,414 2,855 9,269 717 $331.3 1,214 75 6,127 3,050 9,177 658 $307.5 1,170 79 6,186 2,308 8,494 December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 $185,120 $152,052 $157,312 $129,163 $137,424 $114,342 $105,750 $100,734 13,354 3,754 17,108 $0.26 50,678 12,197 4,746 16,943 $0.24 50,686 14,869 5,149 20,018 $0.29 50,664 11,203 3,335 14,538 $0.22 50,577 10,805 6,356 17,161 $0.21 50,555 9,280 5,336 14,616 $0.19 49,808 7,689 4,349 12,038 $0.16 49,047 6,197 3,855 10,052 $0.13 48,958 December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 $668,961 $648,241 $581,368 $528,881 $496,054 $478,616 $434,938 $406,519 784,026 200,386 - - 200,386 289,863 468,351 17,281 485,632 50,583 668,737 11.4% 771,016 198,965 - 1,045 200,010 292,981 455,686 14,508 470,194 50,720 655,696 11.6% 705,049 166,395 - 1,205 167,600 242,845 443,324 12,208 455,532 50,720 610,924 12.1% 641,944 133,752 - 9,914 143,666 202,876 428,386 10,682 439,068 50,686 572,052 11.3% 611,003 105,773 - 9,926 115,699 177,965 416,347 16,691 433,038 50,959 532,046 10.8% 605,510 94,002 - 10,204 104,206 167,265 424,214 14,031 438,245 50,585 528,420 10.1% 553,616 73,293 - 10,213 83,506 142,165 399,944 11,507 411,451 49,108 483,450 9.9% 532,681 61,716 - 10,223 71,939 126,152 392,096 14,433 406,529 49,070 464,035 9.9% December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 382 279 312 297 327 387 267 434 292 265 235 241 237 270 226 287 December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 582 $264.3 1,127 76 6,235 1,843 8,078 685 $309.0 1,113 75 5,429 2,672 8,101 700 $314.2 988 69 5,248 2,402 7,650 477 $226.5 760 54 4,816 1,502 6,318 310 $151.5 736 55 4,495 1,724 6,219 337 $164.6 715 56 4,624 1,073 5,697 331 $165.2 714 54 4,283 1,111 5,394 298 $145.2 625 52 4,039 917 4,956 25 GRBK 20 QUARTER FINANCIAL SUMMARY (4) Summary Consolidated Statement of Income Data for Quarter Ended December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 Total revenues $122,004 $94,032 $103,394 $71,556 Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Income tax provision attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. (2) Basic EPS Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding 7,676 6,001 13,677 $0.16 48,910 6,243 3,624 9,867 $0.13 48,899 $6,743 4,213 10,956 $0.14 48,894 3,094 1,423 4,517 $0.06 48,814 Summary Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 Inventory Total assets Borrowings on lines of credit, net Senior unsecured notes, net Notes payable Term loan facility Total debt Total liabilities Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity Noncontrolling interests Total equity Number of shares outstanding Book value per share Total invested capital Pre-tax return on average invested capital (3) Home Data for Quarter Ended New homes delivered Net new home orders Home Data as of Backlog, units Backlog, $ in millions Units under construction Active communities as of Lots owned Lots controlled Lots owned and controlled 26 $410,662 540,196 74,212 - 10,948 85,160 138,711 384,572 16,913 401,485 48,956 469,732 8.8% $418,356 553,399 80,785 - 9,713 90,498 164,700 376,592 12,107 388,699 48,937 467,090 7.8% $384,742 $505,260 $62,874 - 9,000 71,874 122,601 370,206 12453 382,659 48,937 442,080 6.9% $378,956 504,861 66,833 - 9,988 - 76,821 127,543 362,871 14,447 377,318 48,833 439,692 5.7% December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 275 197 196 204 212 239 161 240 December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 237 $108.0 564 50 4,235 954 5,189 315 $138.7 665 49 4,199 870 5,069 307 $140.3 660 48 3,743 744 4,487 280 $129.2 541 44 3,736 936 4,672 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 March 31, 2015 $88,789 $77,797 $72,988 $59,227 4,693 2,915 7,608 $0.10 48,802 2,826 1,832 4,658 $0.06 48,495 3,788 2,127 5,915 $0.12 31,346 4,018 2,184 6,202 $0.13 31,346 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 March 31, 2015 $346,100 $319,098 $301,527 $289,852 473,074 46,698 - 10,158 - 56,856 101,219 359,532 12,323 371,855 48,833 439,745 13,575 - 11,458 - 25,033 75,705 352,791 11,249 364,040 48,814 417,728 20,108 - 11,822 149,992 181,922 225,329 179,860 12,539 192,399 31,369 408,589 19,087 - 10,750 149,979 179,816 220,976 175,959 11,654 187,613 31,346 416,388 377,824 361,782 355,775 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 March 31, 2015 194 160 154 140 162 169 145 186 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 March 31, 2015 201 $88.1 507 43 3,650 1,084 4,734 235 $98.3 543 42 2,889 1,232 4,121 249 $102.4 522 43 3,529 1,136 4,665 242 $92.8 517 37 3,124 752 3,876 Trophy Signature Homes, Park West Frisco, TX 27 APPENDIX & NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures In this annual report, we utilize certain financial measures that are non-GAAP financial measures as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in addition to certain operational metrics. We present these measures because we believe they and similar measures are useful to management and investors in evaluating the Company’s operating performance and financing structure. We also believe these measures facilitate the comparison of our operating performance and financing structure with other companies in our industry. Because these measures are not calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), they may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. (1) As a result of the comprehensive tax legislation, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), enacted by the U.S. government on December 22, 2017, the Company remeasured its deferred tax asset which resulted in additional tax expense of $19.0 million during the three months ended December 31, 2017. Due to the effects of the Tax Act, the net (loss) income attributable to Green Brick for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2017 is not comparable to the other periods presented in this report. As such, certain annual and quarterly amounts shown in this report have been adjusted to a “Normalized” non-GAAP amount as shown below. For the quarter ended 12.31.2017 Income Before Taxes Income Tax Expense Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest Income Tax Expense Attributable to Green Brick Income Tax Provision Net (loss) income Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests Net (loss) income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Weighted average commons shares outstanding Basic earnings per share For the year ended 12.31.2017: Income Before Taxes Income Tax Expense Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest Income Tax Expense Attributable to Green Brick Income Tax Provision Net (loss) income Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests Net (loss) income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Weighted average commons shares outstanding Basic earnings per share Weighted average commons shares outstanding Basic earnings per share 28 Per GAAP Financials Adjustment "Normalized" Non-GAAP Amount Presented $21,017 (40) (25,356) (25,396) (4,379) (3,816) (8,195) 50,555 $(0.16) $- - 19,000 19,000 19,000 - 19,000 50,555 $0.38 $21,017 (40) (6,356) (6,396) 14,621 (3,816) 10,805 50,555 $0.21 Per GAAP Financials Adjustment "Normalized" Non-GAAP Amount Presented $64,237 (135) (38,896) (39,031) 25,206 (10,236) 14,970 49,597 $0.30 $- - 19,000 19,000 19,000 - 19,000 50,555 $0.38 $64,237 (135) (19,896) (20,031) 44,206 (10,236) 33,970 49,597 $0.68 (2) Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. is reconciled by quarter on pages 24 - 27 of this annual report. This measure is calculated by adding Income tax attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. to Net Income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. The compounded annual growth of this figure is shown on page 7 of this annual report and calculated as follows: Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. for the year ended 12.31.2019 Divided by: Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. for the year ended 12.31.2015 To the Power Of: One Divided by: Number of periods less one Power Less: one Compounded Annual Growth Rate 78,368 24,384 3.21 1.00 4.00 0.25 1.34 (1.00) 0.34 (3) Total invested capital and pre-tax return on average invested capital are both Non-GAAP measures. Total invested capital is calculated as the sum of total debt plus total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity. Pre-tax return on average invested capital is calculated as the sum of Pre-tax income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. for the last four quarters divided by the average of the ending invested capital and beginning invested capital for the period included in the calculation. (4) Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation; specifically, (i) mechanic’s lien contracts revenue was reclassified from other income to revenue, (ii) the cost of model home furnishings was reclassified from inventory to fixed assets, (iii) prepaid plans & development costs were reclassified from other assets to inventory, and (iv) debt balances were presented net of debt issuance costs. (5) Sales is an operational metric reflecting the number of new homes sold. This metric is not indicative of quarterly or annual revenues, gross margins, or financial results. CB JENI Homes, Riverset Garland, Texas 29 BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Einhorn, Chairman Mr. Einhorn has been a director of our predecessor company since May 2006. Mr. Einhorn co-founded and has served as the President of Greenlight Capital, Inc., since January 1996. Funds managed by Greenlight are some of our principal stockholders. Since July 2004, Mr. Einhorn has served as Chairman of the Board of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (Nasdaq: GLRE). Mr. Einhorn received a B.A. in Government from Cornell University. Harry Brandler Mr. Brandler previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Greenlight Capital, Inc. Prior to joining Greenlight Capital, Inc., he served as Chief Financial Officer of Wheatley Partners, a venture capital firm, where he oversaw the firm’s back office operations and restructured the firm’s marketing, client relations, and technology. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Brandler served as a Manager at Goldstein, Golub & Kessler, where he provided audit, tax, and consulting services to investment partnerships and other financial organizations and where he was promoted to Manager in 1999. Mr. Brandler received a B.S. in Accounting from New York University and is admitted as a Certified Public Accountant. Kathleen Olsen Since 2011, Ms. Olsen has been a private investor. From 1999 through 2011, Ms. Olsen served as Chief Financial Officer of Eminence Capital, LLC, a long/short global equity fund. From 1993 to 1999, Ms. Olsen served as audit manager specializing in investment partnerships at Anchin, Block & Anchin LLP, a public accounting firm located in New York City. Ms. Olsen received a B.S. degree with honors from the State University of New York at Albany. Ms. Olsen is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and a member of the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants. from 2006 to 2017. He is Chairman of the Board of Anesthesia Associates of Massachusetts. Previously, he served as a board member and chairman of Transatlantic Holdings (NYSE: TRH) from 2006 to 2012 and Pomeroy IT Solutions (NASDAQ: PMRY) from 2007 to 2009. He served as a board member of the Housing Authority Insurance Group from 2008 to 2015. He was a founding member of the Board of Governors and the Advisory Board of the National Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Center, Stony Brook University and Medical School, New York. Mr. Press earned a B.A. from Brown University; and after serving in the US Army, received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Elizabeth K. Blake Before retiring, Ms. Blake served as Senior Vice President — Advocacy, Government Affairs & General Counsel of Habitat For Humanity International Inc. from 2006 to 2014. Ms. Blake served on the Board of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation from 1998 through its sale to Noble Energy in 2005. From 2003 to 2005, Ms. Blake was the Executive Vice President — Corporate Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for US Airways Group, Inc. She also served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Trizec Properties, Inc., a public real estate investment trust. Ms. Blake served as Vice President and General Counsel of General Electric Power Systems from 1998 to 2002. From 1996 to 1998, Ms. Blake served as Vice President and Chief of Staff of Cinergy Corp. From 1982 to 1984, she was an associate with Frost & Jacobs, a law firm in Cincinnati, Ohio and a partner from 1984 to 1996. From 1977 to 1982, she was with the law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell in New York. She is past Chair of the Ohio Board of Regents. Ms. Blake received a B.A. degree with honors from Smith College and her JD from Columbia Law School, where she was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. Ms. Blake was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Technical Letters by Cincinnati Technical College and an Honorary Doctorate of Letters from the College of Mt. St. Joseph. Richard Press Before retiring in 2006, Mr. Press was a Senior Vice President at Wellington Management, where he started and built the firm’s insurance asset management practice. Prior to that, Mr. Press was a Senior Vice President of Stein Roe & Farnham from 1982 to 1994 and Scudder Stevens and Clark from 1964 to 1982. Mr. Press sat on various committees of the Controlled Risk Insurance Company and the Risk Management Foundation John R. Farris Since 2007, Mr. Farris has been the founder and President of Commonwealth Economics, LLC. Prior to forming Commonwealth Economics, LLC, he served as Secretary of the Finance and Administration Cabinet for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Farris served as an adjunct Professor of Economics and Finance at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky. Mr. Farris previously worked at the Center for Economics Research 30 at the Research Triangle Institute, the World Bank, and the International Finance Corporation. He currently sits on the board of directors for Farmers Capital Bank Corporation (NASDAQ: FFKT). Mr. Farris holds a B.S. from Centre College and a M.P.A. from Princeton University. James R. Brickman Mr. Brickman is responsible for all major investment decisions, capital allocation, strategic planning, and relationships with Green Brick Partners builders. He was the founding manager and advisor of each of JBGL Capital LP, since 2008, and JBGL Builder Finance LLC, since 2010. Prior to forming JBGL, Mr. Brickman was a manager of various joint ventures and limited partnerships that developed and built low- and high-rise office buildings, multi-family and condominium homes, single-family homes, entitled land and provided property management services. He previously also served as Chairman and CEO of Princeton Homes Ltd. and Princeton Realty Corporation, which developed land, constructed custom single-family homes, and managed apartments it built. Mr. Brickman has over 40 years of experience in nearly all phases of real estate construction, development, and real estate finance property management. Mr. Brickman received a B.B.A. and M.B.A degrees from Southern Methodist University. COMMITTEE MEMBERS All Green Brick Partners committee members are independent directors. Audit Committee Kathleen Olsen, Committee Chair John R. Farris and Richard Press Compensation Committee Richard Press, Committee Chair Kathleen Olsen and Elizabeth K. Blake Governance and Nominating Committee Elizabeth K. Blake, Committee Chair Kathleen Olsen and John R. Farris GHO Homes, Orchid Cove Vero Beach, FL 31 OPERATING RESULTS & FORM 10-K Part I Item 1. Business Green Brick Partners, Inc. (formerly named BioFuel Energy Corp.) and its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”, “we”, or “Green Brick”) is a diversified homebuilding and land development company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 11, 2006. We acquire and develop land, provide land and construction financing to our wholly owned and controlled builders (together, “builders”) and participate in the profits of our builders. Our core markets are in the high growth U.S. metropolitan areas of Dallas, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia, as well as the Vero Beach, Florida area. We also own a noncontrolling interest in a builder in Colorado Springs, Colorado. We are engaged in all aspects of the homebuilding process, including land acquisition and development, entitlements, design, construction, title and mortgage services, marketing and sales and the creation of brand images at our residential neighborhoods and master planned communities. We believe we offer higher quality homes with more distinctive designs and floor plans than those built by our competitors at comparable prices. Our communities are located in premium locations and we seek to enhance homebuyer satisfaction by utilizing high-quality materials, offering a broad range of customization options and building well-crafted homes. We seek to maximize value over the long term and operate our business to mitigate risks in the event of a downturn by controlling costs and quickly reacting to regional and local market trends. We are a leading lot developer in our markets and believe that our strict operating discipline provides us with a competitive advantage in seeking to maximize returns while minimizing risk. We currently own or control approximately 9,000 home sites in high-growth submarkets throughout the Dallas and Atlanta metropolitan areas and the Vero Beach, Florida market. We are strategically positioned to either build new homes on our lots through our builders or to sell finished lots to third-party homebuilders. We sell finished lots to our builders or option lots from third-party developers for our builders’ homebuilding operations and provide them with construction financing and strategic planning. Our builders provide us with their local knowledge and relationships. We support some of our Dallas and Atlanta builders by financing their purchases of land from us at an unlevered internal rate of return (“IRR”) of typically 20% or more and by providing construction financing at an interest rate target of at least 13.85%, subject to changes due to market conditions. Our income is further enhanced by our equity interest in the profits of our builders. In December 2018, EJB River Holdings, LLC joint venture (“EJB River Holdings”) was formed by The Providence Group of Georgia LLC (“TPG”) with the purpose to acquire and develop a tract of land in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In May 2019, East Jones Bridge, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“EJB”) was admitted as a member of EJB River Holdings, which resulted in TPG and EJB each having a 50% ownership interest in EJB River Holdings. EJB River Holdings had no activity in the period from its formation until October 2019. In October 2019, EJB River Holdings received two $5.0 million initial contributions from its two members, TPG and EJB. In December 2019, two additional contributions of $0.3 million were made by TPG and EJB to EJB River Holdings. The Company determined that the investment in EJB River Holdings should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Frisco Springs Amenity Center Frisco, TX 32 Effective November 30, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, SGHDAL LLC (“Southgate”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Southgate Homes DFW LLC. As a result, Southgate became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Effective December 31, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, CLH20, LLC (“Centre Living”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Centre Living Homes, LLC, and we contributed certain real estate inventory assets to Centre Living. Subsequently, the prior owner of a portion of the membership and voting interests in Centre Living Homes, LLC acquired a ten percent membership and voting interest in Centre Living for $3.6 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2019, Centre Living was an indirect subsidiary in which the Company owned a ninety percent membership interest and a ninety percent voting interest. In December 2019, the Company announced its plans to expand the business of Trophy Signature Homes, LLC, a wholly owned homebuilding company (“Trophy”) into Houston, Texas. Trophy was formed in September 2018 and allowed the Company to expand its business and offer homes at a new price point within the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex market. Trophy began home sales in the first half of 2019 and has generated revenues of $13.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. The following table presents general information about our builders, including the types of homes they build and their price ranges. Builder Year Formed Market Products Offered Price Range The Providence Group of Georgia LLC (“TPG”) 2011 Atlanta Townhomes Condominiums Single Family $320,000 to $690,000 $380,000 to $580,000 $340,000 to $1,010,000 CB JENI Homes DFW LLC (“CB JENI”) 2012 Dallas Townhomes Single Family $230,000 to $480,000 $330,000 to $760,000 CLH20 LLC (“Centre Living”) 2012 Dallas Townhomes Single Family $340,000 to $550,000 $390,000 to $850,000 SGHDAL LLC (“Southgate”) 2013 Dallas Luxury Homes $500,000 to $1,060,000 GRBK GHO Homes LLC (“GRBK GHO”) 2018 Vero Beach Patio Homes Single Family $200,000 to $400,000 $250,000 to $750,000 Trophy Signature Homes LLC (“Trophy”) 2018 Dallas Single Family $240,000 to $560,000 Centre Living Homes, CL @ Lakewood Dallas, TX 33 Revenues from homebuilding operations accounted for 96%, 94% and 96% of the Company’s total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. For more information regarding the Company’s segments, refer to Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements located in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” located in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our backlog reflects the number and value of homes for which we have entered into sales contracts with customers but not yet delivered. With the exception of a normal cancellation rate, we expect all of the backlog as of December 31, 2019 to be filled during 2020. The following table sets forth the information about selling communities and backlog of our builders. Year Ended December 31, 2019 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Builder Average Selling Communities Selling Communities Backlog, Units Backlog, in thousands Selling Communities Backlog, Units TPG CB JENI Centre Living Southgate GRBK GHO Trophy Total 23 25 7 10 16 5 86 19 28 9 11 18 10 95 104 294 14 71 147 156 786 $58,905 115,057 7,696 49,280 56,021 59,869 $346,828 27 21 6 8 14 — 76 146 170 14 55 197 — 582 Backlog in thousands $77,563 67,988 7,493 37,873 73,358 — $264,275 For more information on recent business developments and results of operations, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” located in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Centre Living Homes, Swiss Ave Crossing Dallas, TX 34 Business Strategy We believe we are well-positioned for growth through the disciplined execution of the following elements of our strategy: Combine Land Acquisition and Development Expertise with Homebuilding Operations to Maximize Profitability Our ability to identify, acquire and develop land in desirable locations and on favorable terms is critical to our success. We evaluate land opportunities based on how we expect such opportunities will contribute to overall profitability and returns, rather than how they might drive volume on a market basis. We identify attractive properties that are typically located in prime neighborhood locations. We consider the existing and future supply of developable land before working to acquire the best-valued properties. Analysis includes consideration of development costs in addition to land costs. We have found that the prime quality infill locations have limited supply competition that may result in smaller value declines in down markets. We manage and oversee all land development with our in-house staff. We believe our expertise in land development and planning enables us to create desirable communities that meet or exceed our target homebuyer’s expectations, while selling homes at competitive prices. Our strategy of holding land inventory provides us with a multi-year supply of lots for future homebuilding while limiting any excess supply that would otherwise be subject to market cycle risk. We focus on the development of entitled parcels in communities where we can generally sell all lots and homes within 24 to 60 months from the start of sales. This focus allows us to limit exposure to land development and market cycle risk while pursuing favorable returns on our investments. We seek to minimize our exposure to land risk through disciplined management of entitlements, the use of land and lot options and other flexible land acquisition arrangements. We are actively involved in every step of the land entitlement, home design and construction processes with our builders. Maximize Benefits of Diversified Homebuilding and Land Development Structure Our diversified homebuilding and land development structure provides the flexibility to monetize the value of our land assets either by building and selling homes through our builders or developing land and selling finished lots to unaffiliated homebuilders. When evaluating our land assets, we consider the potential contribution of each asset to our overall performance, taking into account the timeframe over which we may monetize the asset. While we currently expect the majority of our land to be utilized by our homebuilders, we believe our land development and homebuilding strategy provides us with increased flexibility to seek to maximize risk-adjusted returns as market conditions warrant. Increase Long-Term Value by Investing in Infrastructure In our communities, we typically make enhanced investment in infrastructure, including landscaping and amenity centers, and enforce higher construction standards through our builders. We believe this creates greater long- term value for us and for our builders, homebuyers, shareholders and the communities in which we build. Disciplined Investment Approach We seek to maximize value over the long-term and operate our business to mitigate risks in the event of a downturn by controlling costs and focusing on regional and local market trends. Our management team has gained significant operating expertise through varied economic cycles. The perspective gained from these experiences has helped shape our investment approach. We believe that our management team has learned to effectively evaluate housing trends in our markets, and to react quickly and rationally to market changes. Our cycle-tested management approach balances strategic planning with day-to-day decision-making responsibilities, freeing up our builders to concentrate on growing our homebuilding business rather than focusing on obtaining capital to fund their operations. We believe that our strict operating discipline provides us with a competitive advantage in seeking to maximize returns while minimizing risk. Increase Market Positions in Housing Markets with a Favorable Growth Outlook and Strong Demand Fundamentals We believe that we have strategically well-located land and lot positions within our core markets and that we have acquired our land and lot positions at attractive prices, providing us with significant opportunity for a healthy return on our investment. We believe our core markets exhibit attractive residential real estate investment characteristics, such as growing economies, improving levels of employment and population growth relative to national averages, favorable migration patterns, general housing affordability, and desirable 35 lifestyle and weather characteristics. We believe that increasing demand and supply constraints in our core markets create favorable conditions for our future growth. We believe that there are significant opportunities to profitably expand in our core markets. For example, we currently own or control approximately 9,000 home sites in the Dallas, Atlanta and Vero Beach markets. In Dallas and Atlanta, we seek to acquire land with convenient access to metropolitan areas which have diverse economic and employment bases and demographics that we believe will support long-term growth. We continuously review the allocation of our investments in these markets taking into account demographic trends and the likely impact on our operating results. We use the results of these reviews to reallocate our investments to those areas where we believe we can maximize our profitability and return on capital. We seek to use our local relationships with land sellers, brokers and investors to pursue the purchase of additional land parcels in our core markets. While our primary growth strategy focuses on increasing our market position in our existing markets, we may, on an opportunistic basis, explore expansion into attractive new markets. on lines of credit and the senior unsecured notes, net of debt issuance costs, divided by the total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity. It is our intent to prudently employ leverage to continue to invest in our land acquisition, development and homebuilding businesses. We target a debt to total capitalization ratio of approximately 30% to 35%, which we expect will continue to provide us with significant additional growth capital. Pursue Acquisitions of Additional Homebuilders We intend to pursue the acquisition of additional homebuilders in our core and new markets. Our preference is to continue to acquire controlling interests in homebuilders with existing management continuing to own a significant ownership stake. We will seek to acquire and then retain management teams which have strong local relationships with land owners and have a positive reputation for building well-crafted homes in their markets. We expect that our ability to provide capital discipline and strategic oversight will complement the local skills, relationships and reputations of our future homebuilder partners. Superior Design, Broad Product Range and Enhanced Homebuying Experience Marketing and Sales Process Within each of our markets, we partner our expertise with that of our builders to design attractive neighborhoods and homes to appeal to a wide variety of potential homebuyers. One of our core operating philosophies is to create a culture which provides a positive, memorable experience for our homebuyers through active engagement in the building process. At higher price points, we provide our homebuyers with customization options to suit their specific needs and tastes. In consultation with nationally and locally recognized architecture firms, interior and exterior consultants and homeowner focus groups, we research and design a diversified range of products for various levels and price points. Our homebuilding projects include townhomes, patio homes, single family homes and luxury custom homes. We believe we can adapt quickly to changing market conditions and optimize performance and returns while strategically reducing portfolio risk because of our diversified product strategy. Pursue Further Growth Through the Prudent Use of Leverage As of December 31, 2019, our debt to total capitalization ratio was 31.3%. The debt to total capitalization ratio is calculated as the sum of borrowings 36 We offer a preferred lender referral program through our mortgage subsidiary to provide lending options to homebuyers in need of financing. We offer homeowners a comprehensive warranty on each home. Homes are generally covered by a ten-year warranty for structural concerns, one year for defects and products used, two years for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning parts and labor. We sell our homes through our internal sales representatives and also through independent real estate brokers. Our in-house sales force typically works from sales offices located in model homes near or in each community. Sales representatives assist potential buyers by providing them with basic floor plans, price information, development and construction timetables, tours of model homes, and the selection of customization and upgrade options. Sales personnel are trained by us and generally have had prior experience selling new homes in the local market. Our personnel, along with subcontracted marketing and design consultants, carefully design the exterior and interior of each home to appeal to the lifestyles of targeted homebuyers. Additionally, we advertise through the use of model homes, social media, newspapers, billboards, real estate market publications, brochures, and newsletters. Raw Materials Typically, all the raw materials and most of the components used in our business are readily available in the United States. Most are standard items carried by major suppliers. However, a rapid increase in the number of homes started could cause shortages in the availability of such materials or in the price of services, thereby leading to delays in the delivery of homes. We continue to monitor the supply markets to achieve the best prices available. See “Risk Factors - Labor and raw material shortages and price fluctuations could delay or increase the cost of land development and home construction, which could materially and adversely affect our business.” Seasonality The homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes five to nine months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders are delivered. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occur during the third and fourth quarters. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long- term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry. Competition Competition in the homebuilding industry is intense, and there are relatively low barriers to entry. Homebuilders compete for, among other things, homebuyers, desirable land parcels, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. Increased competition could hurt our business, as it could prevent us from acquiring attractive land parcels on which to build homes or make such acquisitions more expensive, hinder our market share expansion, and lead to pricing pressures on our homes that may adversely impact our revenues and margins. If we are unable to successfully compete, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our competitors may independently develop land and construct housing units that are superior or substantially similar to our products. Furthermore, a number of our primary competitors are significantly larger, have a longer operating history and may have greater resources or lower cost of capital; accordingly, they may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of the markets in which we operate. Many of these competitors also have longstanding relationships with subcontractors and suppliers in the markets in which we operate. We also compete for sales with individual resales of existing homes and with available rental housing. Government Regulation and Environmental Matters Our developments are subject to numerous local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, development, building design, construction and similar matters that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements, the result of which is to limit the number of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Projects that are not entitled may be subjected to periodic delays, changes in use, less intensive development or elimination of development in certain areas due to government regulations. We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in the future. Local governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development and service fees for projects in their jurisdiction. Projects for which we have received land use and development entitlements or approvals may still require a variety of other governmental approvals and permits during the development process and can also be impacted adversely by unforeseen health, safety and welfare issues, which can further delay these projects or prevent their development. We are also subject to a variety of local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary according to multiple factors, including the site’s location, its environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site, as well as adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding and land development activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas. In addition, in those cases where an endangered or threatened species is involved, environmental rules and regulations can result in the restriction or elimination of development in identified environmentally sensitive areas. From time to time, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and similar federal or state agencies review homebuilders’ compliance with environmental laws and may levy fines and penalties for failure to comply strictly with applicable environmental laws or impose additional requirements for future compliance as a result of past failures. Any such actions taken may increase our costs. Further, we expect 37 that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on homebuilders and land developers in the future. Environmental regulations can also have an adverse impact on the availability and price of certain raw materials such as lumber. Under various environmental laws, current or former owners of real estate, as well as certain other categories of parties, may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for related damages, including bodily injury, and investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination. Please see “Risk Factors” located in Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Employees As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 460 employees, including those of our builders. Although none of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, certain of the subcontractors engaged by us or our affiliates are represented by labor unions or are subject to collective bargaining arrangements. We believe that our relations with our employees and subcontractors are good. Available Information Our website address is www.greenbrickpartners.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our website and the information contained or incorporated therein are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our investors. Any of these risks could significantly and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the information contained under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements”. 38 Risks Related to our Business and Industry The homebuilding industry is cyclical. A severe downturn in the industry could adversely affect our business, results of operations and stockholders’ equity. The residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in general economic conditions such as levels of employment, consumer confidence and income, availability of financing for acquisitions, construction and permanent mortgages, interest rate levels, inflation and demand for housing. The U.S. housing market could be negatively impacted by declining consumer confidence, restrictive mortgage standards and large supplies of foreclosures, resales and new homes, among other factors. When combined with a prolonged economic downturn, high unemployment levels, increases in the rate of inflation and uncertainty in the U.S. economy, these conditions could contribute to decreased demand for housing, declining sales prices and increasing pricing pressure. In the event that demand for housing stalls or declines, we could experience declines in the market value of our inventory and demand for our lots, homes and construction loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Our operating performance is subject to risks associated with the real estate industry. Real estate investments are subject to various risks and fluctuations and cycles in value and demand, many of which are beyond our control. Certain events may decrease cash available for operations, as well as the value of our real estate assets. These events include, but are not limited to: •adverse changes in international, national or local economic and demographic conditions; •adverse changes in financial conditions of buyers and sellers of properties, particularly residential homes and land suitable for development of residential homes; •competition from other real estate investors with significant capital, including other real estate operating companies and developers and institutional investment funds; •fluctuations in interest rates, which could adversely affect the ability of homebuyers to obtain financing on favorable terms or their willingness to obtain financing at all; •unanticipated increases in expenses, including, without limitation, insurance costs, development costs, real estate assessments and other taxes and costs of compliance with laws, regulations and governmental policies; and •changes in enforcement of laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety, environmental, zoning and tax laws. Alternatively, a significant period of deflation could cause a decrease in overall spending and borrowing levels. This could lead to a deterioration in economic conditions, including an increase in the rate of unemployment. Deflation could also cause the value of our inventory to decline or reduce the value of existing homes below the related mortgage loan balance, which could potentially increase the supply of existing homes and have a negative impact on our results of operations. In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in the purchase of homes or an increased incidence of home order cancellations. If we cannot successfully implement our business strategy, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected. Further, acts of war, any outbreak or escalation of hostilities between the United States and any foreign power or acts of terrorism may cause disruption to the U.S. economy, or the local economies of the markets in which we operate, cause shortages of building materials, increase costs associated with obtaining building materials, result in building code changes that could increase costs of construction, affect job growth and consumer confidence or cause economic changes that we cannot anticipate, all of which could reduce demand for our lots, homes and construction loans and adversely impact our business and results of operations. We are dependent on the continued availability and satisfactory performance of subcontractors which, if unavailable, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We conduct our land development and homebuilding operations primarily as a general contractor. Virtually all land development and construction work is performed by unaffiliated third-party subcontractors. As a consequence, the timing and quality of the development of our land and the construction of our homes depends on the availability and skill of our subcontractors. There may not be sufficient availability of and satisfactory performance by these unaffiliated third-party subcontractors in the markets in which we operate. If there are inadequate subcontractor resources, our ability to meet customer demands, both timing and quality, could be adversely affected which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our future growth and our profitability. Our business and financial results could be adversely affected by significant inflation or deflation. Inflation can adversely affect our homebuilding operations by increasing costs of land, financing, materials, labor and construction. While we attempt to pass on cost increases to homebuyers through increased prices, in a weak housing market, we may not be able to offset cost increases with higher selling prices. In addition, significant inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which have a negative impact on housing demand. In a highly inflationary environment, depending on industry and other economic conditions, we may be precluded from raising home prices enough to keep up with the rate of inflation, which could reduce our profit margins. Moreover, with inflation, the costs of capital increase and the purchasing power of our cash resources could decline. Current or future efforts by the government to stimulate the economy may increase the risk of significant inflation and its adverse impact on our business or financial results. Labor and raw material shortages and price fluctuations could delay or increase the cost of land development and home construction, which could materially and adversely affect our business. The residential construction industry experiences labor and raw material shortages from time to time, including shortages in qualified tradespeople and supplies such as insulation, drywall, cement, steel and lumber. These labor and raw material shortages can be more severe during periods of strong demand for housing or during periods when a region in which we operate experiences a natural disaster that has a significant impact on existing residential and commercial structures. The cost of labor and raw materials may also be adversely affected during periods of shortage or high inflation. Shortages and price increases could cause delays in, and increase our costs of, land development and home construction, which we may not be able to recover by raising home prices due to market demand and because the price for each home is typically set prior to its delivery pursuant to the agreement of sale with the homebuyer. In addition, the federal government has, at various times during 2018 and 2019, imposed tariffs on a variety 39 of imports from foreign countries and may impose additional tariffs in the future. Significant tariffs or other restrictions are placed on raw materials that we use in our homebuilding operation, such as lumber or steel, could cause the cost of home construction to increase which we may not be able to recover by raising home prices or which could slow our absorption due to being constrained by market demand. As a result, shortages or increased costs of labor and raw materials could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to recruit, retain and develop highly skilled, competent employees may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Key employees, including management team members at both the corporate and homebuilder subsidiary levels, are fundamental to our ability to obtain, generate and manage opportunities. If any of the management team members were to cease employment with us, our results of operations could suffer. Our ability to retain our management team or to attract suitable replacements should any members of its management team leave is dependent on the competitive nature of the employment market. The loss of services from key management team members or a limitation in their availability could materially and adversely impact our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets. In addition, we do not maintain key person insurance in respect of any member of our named executive officers. In addition, key employees working in the land development, homebuilding and construction industries are highly sought after. Experienced employees in the homebuilding, land acquisition and construction industries are fundamental to our ability to generate, obtain and manage opportunities. In particular, local knowledge and relationships are critical to our ability to source attractive land acquisition opportunities. Failure to attract and retain such personnel or to ensure that their experience and knowledge is not lost when they leave the business through retirement, redundancy or otherwise may adversely affect the standards of our service and may have an adverse impact on our business, financial conditions and results of operations. Our long-term success depends on our ability to acquire undeveloped land, partially finished developed lots and finished lots suitable for residential homebuilding at reasonable prices, in accordance with our land investment criteria. The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for suitable land and the risk inherent in purchasing and developing land is directly impacted by changes in consumer demand for housing. The availability of finished and partially finished developed lots and undeveloped land for purchase that meet our investment criteria depends on a number of factors outside our control, including land availability, competition with other homebuilders and land buyers, inflation in land prices, zoning, allowable housing density, the ability to obtain building permits and other regulatory requirements. Should suitable land or lots become more difficult to locate or obtain, the number of lots we may be able to develop and sell could decrease, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell could be reduced and the cost of land could increase, perhaps substantially, which could adversely impact our results of operations. As competition for suitable land increases, the cost of acquiring both finished and undeveloped lots and the cost of developing owned land could rise and the availability of suitable land at acceptable prices may decline, which could adversely impact our financial results. The availability of suitable land assets could also affect the success of our land acquisition strategy, which may impact our ability to increase the number of active selling communities, to grow our revenues and margins and to achieve or maintain profitability. If we are unable to develop communities successfully or within expected timeframes, our results of operations could be adversely affected. Before a community generates any revenue, time and material expenditures are required to acquire and prepare land, entitle and finish lots, obtain development approvals, pay taxes and construct significant portions of project infrastructure, amenities, model homes and sales facilities. It can take several years from the time that we acquire control of a property to the time that we make our first home sale on the site. Delays in the development of communities expose us to the risk of changes in market conditions for homes. A decline in our ability to develop and market our communities successfully and to generate positive cash flow from these operations in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and on our ability to service our debt and to meet our working capital requirements. 40 Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions may be limited and we may be forced to hold non- income producing assets for an extended period of time. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms that we set or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. We depend on the success of our partially owned controlled builders. We participate in the homebuilding business, in part, through non-wholly owned subsidiaries, which we refer to as our “controlled builders.” We are able to exercise control over the operations of each controlled builder. We have entered into arrangements with these controlled builders in order to take advantage of their local knowledge and relationships, acquire attractive land positions and brand images, manage our risk profile and leverage our capital base. Even though the co-investors in our controlled builders are subject to certain non-competition provisions, the viability of our participation in the homebuilding business depends on our ability to maintain good relationships with our controlled builders. Our controlled builders are focused on maximizing the value of their operations and working with a partner that can help them be successful. The effectiveness of our management, the value of our expertise and the rapport we maintain with our controlled builders are important factors for new builders considering doing business with us and may affect our ability to attract homebuyers, subcontractors, employees or others upon whom our business, financial condition and results of operations ultimately depend. Further, our relationships with our controlled builders generate additional business opportunities that support our growth. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with our controlled builders, we may be unable to fully take advantage of existing agreements or expand our relationships with these controlled builders. Additionally, our opportunities for pursuing acquisitions of additional builders may be adversely impacted. In Dallas and Atlanta, we sell lots to our controlled builders for their homebuilding operations and provide them loans to finance home construction. If our controlled builders fail to successfully execute their business strategies for any reason, they may be unable to purchase lots from us, repay outstanding construction finance loans made by us or borrow from us in the future, any of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. An integral component of our growth strategy is the use of controlled builders, joint ventures, partnerships and other strategic investments, and these counterparties’ interests may not be wholly aligned with ours or those of our investors. Our controlled builders and the third parties with whom we enter into partnerships, joint ventures or other strategic investments are separate and distinct entities from us. Consequently, these counterparties may have different economic, financial and industry positions from us which could influence their business decisions, including but not limited to strategic decision-making which they believe to be in their best interests but which may not be aligned with those of our shareholders. While we exercise different levels of control over the entities in which we invest or co-invest, our rights may be limited contractually or by statute and we may not be able to ensure that their decisions are in alignment with those of our investors. Disputes between us and these third parties could result in legal proceedings that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. If our counterparties take actions that are not in our best interests it could have a material adverse effect on our business and our profitability. If we are required to either repurchase or sell a substantial portion of the equity interest in our controlled homebuilding subsidiaries, our capital resources and liquidity could be adversely affected. The operating agreements governing our partially owned controlled builders contain buy-sell provisions that may be triggered in certain circumstances. In the event that a buy-sell event occurs, our builder will have the right to initiate a buy-sell process, which may happen at an inconvenient time for us. In the event the buy-sell provisions are exercised at a time when we lack sufficient capital to purchase the remaining equity interest, we may elect to sell our equity interest in the entity. If we are forced to sell our equity interest, we will no longer benefit from the future operations of the applicable entity. If a buy-sell provision is exercised and we elect to purchase the interest in an entity that we do not already own, we may be obligated to expend significant capital in order to complete such acquisition, which may result in our being unable to pursue other investments or opportunities. If either of these events occurs, our revenue and net income could decline or we may not have sufficient capital necessary to implement our growth strategy. 41 Our geographic concentration could materially and adversely affect us if the homebuilding industry in our current markets should decline. Changes in global or regional environmental conditions and governmental actions in response to such changes may adversely affect us by increasing the costs of or restricting our planned or future growth activities. In Dallas, we principally operate in the counties of Dallas, Collin and Denton. In Atlanta, we principally operate in the counties of Fulton, Gwinnett, Cobb, Forsyth, Cherokee and Dekalb. In Florida, we principally operate in the counties of Indian River and St. Lucie. To the extent housing demand and population growth slow in our core markets, our favorable growth outlook may not be realized. Furthermore, we may be unable to compete effectively with the resale home market in our core markets. Because our operations are concentrated in these areas, a prolonged economic downturn in one or more of these areas could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, and a disproportionately greater impact on us than other homebuilders with more diversified operations. Further, slower rates of population growth or population declines in the Dallas, Atlanta or Vero Beach markets, especially as compared to the high population growth rates in prior years, could affect the demand for housing, causing home prices in these markets to decline and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our developments are subject to government regulation, which could cause us to incur significant liabilities or restrict our business activities. Our developments are subject to numerous local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, development, building design, construction and similar matters that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements, the result of which is to limit the number and type of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Projects that are not yet entitled may be subjected to periodic delays, changes in use, less intensive development or elimination of development in certain specific areas due to government regulations. We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in the future. Local governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development and service fees for projects in their jurisdiction. Projects for which we have received land use and development entitlements or approvals may still require a variety of other governmental approvals and permits during the development process and can also be impacted adversely by unforeseen health, safety and welfare issues, which can further delay these projects or prevent their development. As a result, lot and home sales could decline and costs could increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our current results of operations and our long-term growth prospects. 42 There is growing concern from many members of the scientific community and the general public that an increase in global average temperatures due to emissions of greenhouse gases and other human activities have caused, or will cause, significant changes in weather patterns and increase the frequency and severity of natural disasters. Government mandates, standards or regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or projected climate change impacts have resulted, and are likely to continue to result, in restrictions on land development in certain areas and increased energy, transportation and raw material costs. Governmental requirements directed at reducing effects on climate could cause us to incur expenses that we cannot recover or that will require us to increase the price of homes we sell to the point that it affects demand for those homes. Our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by and decrease in the value of our land or homes declines as well as the associated carrying costs. We continuously acquire land for replacement of land inventory and expansion within our current markets, and may in the future acquire land for expansion into new markets. However, the market value of land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions, and the measures we employ to manage inventory risk may not be adequate to insulate our operations from a severe drop in inventory values. If housing demand decreases below what we anticipated when we acquired our inventory, we may not be able to generate profits consistent with those we have generated in the past and we may not be able to recover our costs when we sell lots and homes. When market conditions are such that land values are not appreciating, option arrangements previously entered into may become less desirable, at which time we may elect to forgo deposits and pre- acquisition costs and terminate such arrangements. In the face of adverse market conditions, we may have substantially higher inventory carrying costs, may have to write down our inventory as a result of impairment and/or may have to sell land or homes at a loss. Any material write-downs of assets, or sales at a loss, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Demand for our homes and lots is dependent on the cost and availability of mortgage financing. Changes in the method pursuant to which LIBOR rates are determined and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may affect our financial results. Our business depends on the ability of our homebuyers, as well as the ability of those who buy homes from the third-party homebuilding entities to which we sell lots (our “homebuilding customers”), to obtain financing for the purchase of their homes. Many of these homebuyers must sell their existing homes in order to buy a home from us or our homebuilding customers. Rising interest rates, decreased availability of mortgage financing or of certain mortgage programs, higher down payment requirements or increased monthly mortgage costs may lead to reduced demand for our homes, lots and construction loans. Increased interest rates can also hinder our ability to realize our backlog because certain of our home purchase contracts provide homebuyers with a financing contingency. Financing contingencies allow homebuyers to cancel their home purchase contracts in the event that they cannot arrange for adequate financing. As a result, rising interest rates can decrease our home sales and mortgage originations. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the federal government has a significant role in supporting mortgage lending through its conservatorship of Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), both of which purchase home mortgages and mortgage- backed securities originated by mortgage lenders, and its insurance of mortgages originated by lenders through the Federal Housing Administration (the “FHA”) and the Veterans Administration (“VA”). The availability and affordability of mortgage loans, including consumer interest rates for such loans, could be adversely affected by a curtailment or cessation of the federal government’s mortgage-related programs or policies. The FHA may continue to impose stricter loan qualification standards, raise minimum down payment requirements, impose higher mortgage insurance premiums and other costs and/or limit the number of mortgages it insures. Due to growing federal budget deficits, the U.S. Treasury may not be able to continue supporting the mortgage-related activities of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FHA and the VA at present levels, or it may revise significantly the federal government’s participation in and support of the residential mortgage market. Because the availability of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA- and VA-backed mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing and selling many of our homes, any limitations, restrictions or changes in the availability of such government- backed financing could reduce our home sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) has announced that the FCA intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021 (the “FCA Announcement”). The FCA Announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. Following the implementation of any reforms to LIBOR or the methods pursuant to which LIBOR rates are determined, or other benchmark rates that may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, the manner of administration of such benchmarks may change, with the result that such benchmarks may perform differently than in the past, such benchmarks could be eliminated entirely, or there could be other consequences which cannot be predicted. Under our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, LIBOR may be used to set the fluctuating interest rate (the “Base Rate”) and the interest rate for any Eurodollar Rate Advance. If LIBOR is phased out, we may be required to renegotiate with our lender to establish a new interest rate (the “LIBOR Successor Rate”). We can give no assurance that we and our lender will be able to agree on a LIBOR Successor Rate. If we and our lender cannot agree on a LIBOR Successor Rate, our ability to draw upon the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility may be materially impacted. Any increase in unemployment or underemployment may lead to an increase in the number of loan delinquencies and property repossessions, which would have an adverse impact on our business. People who are not employed, are underemployed, who have left the labor force or are concerned about the loss of their jobs are less likely to purchase new homes, may be forced to try to sell the homes they own and may face difficulties in making required mortgage payments. Therefore, any increase in unemployment or underemployment may lead to an increase in the number of loan delinquencies and property repossessions and have an adverse impact on our business both by reducing demand for our homes, lots and construction loans and by increasing the supply of homes for sale. Increases in the after-tax costs of owning a home could prevent reduce demand for our homes and lots. On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). 43 The Tax Act made major changes to the Internal Revenue Code that, in part, affect the after-tax cost of owning a home. Specifically, the Tax Act limited the ability of homebuyers to deduct (i) property taxes, (ii) mortgage interest, and (iii) state and local income taxes. Due to such changes, the after-tax cost of owning a new home has increased for many of our potential homebuyers and the potential homebuyers of our homebuilding customers. In addition, if the federal government or a state government further changes its income tax laws to further eliminate or substantially limit these income tax deductions, the after-tax cost of owning a new home would further increase for many of our potential customers. The loss or reduction of these homeowner tax deductions that have historically been available has and could further reduce the perceived affordability of homeownership, and therefore the demand for and sales price of new homes, including ours. In addition, increases in property tax rates or fees on developers by local governmental authorities, as experienced in response to reduced federal and state funding or to fund local initiatives, such as funding schools or road improvements, or increases in insurance premiums can adversely affect the ability of potential customers to obtain financing or their desire to purchase new homes, and can have an adverse impact on our business and financial results. The occurrence of severe weather or natural disasters could increase our operating expenses and reduce our revenues and cash flows. The climates and geology of the states in which we operate present increased risks of severe weather and natural disasters. The occurrence of severe weather conditions or natural disasters can delay new home deliveries and lot development, reduce the availability of materials and/or negatively impact the demand for new homes in affected areas. Further, to the extent that hurricanes, severe storms, earthquakes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, wildfires or other natural disasters or similar events occur, our homes under construction or our lots under development could be damaged or destroyed, which may result in losses exceeding our insurance coverage. Any of these events could increase our operating expenses, impair our cash flows and reduce our revenues. To the extent that climate change increases the frequency and severity of weather related disasters, we may experience increasing negative weather related impacts to our operations in the future. High cancellation rates may negatively impact our business. Our backlog reflects the number and value of homes for which we have 44 entered into non-contingent sales contracts with homebuyers but not yet delivered. Although these sales contracts require a cash deposit, a homebuyer may in certain circumstances cancel the contract and receive a complete or partial refund of the deposit as a result of contract provisions. If home prices decline, the national or local homebuilding environment or general economy weakens, our neighboring competitors reduce their sales prices (or increase their sales incentives), interest rates increase or the availability of mortgage financing tightens, homebuyers may have an incentive to cancel their contracts with us, even where they might be entitled to no refund or only a partial refund. Significant cancellations could have a material adverse effect on our business as a result of lost sales revenue and the accumulation of unsold housing inventory. We may not be able to compete effectively against competitors in the homebuilding, land development and financial services industries. Competition in the land development and homebuilding industries is intense, and there are relatively low barriers to entry. Land developers and homebuilders compete for, among other things, homebuyers, desirable land parcels, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. Increased competition could hurt our business, as it could prevent us from acquiring attractive land parcels for development and resale or homebuilding (or make such acquisitions more expensive), hinder our market share expansion and lead to pricing pressures that adversely impact our margins and revenues. If we are unable to compete successfully, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our competitors may independently develop land and construct housing units that are superior or substantially similar to our products. Furthermore, a number of our primary competitors are significantly larger, have a longer operating history and may have greater resources or lower cost of capital than us. Accordingly, competitors may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of the markets in which we operate. Many of these competitors also have longstanding relationships with subcontractors and suppliers in the markets in which we operate. Our homebuilding business also competes for sales with individual resales of existing homes and with available rental housing. Our construction financing business competes with other lenders, including national, regional and local banks and other financial institutions, some of which have greater access to capital or different lending criteria and may be able to offer more attractive financing to potential homebuyers. Our future growth may include additional strategic investments, joint ventures, partnerships and/or acquisitions of companies that may not be as successful as we anticipate and could disrupt our ongoing businesses and adversely affect our operations. In addition to the financing provided by the senior unsecured notes, we currently have access to a senior secured revolving credit facility and a senior unsecured revolving credit facility. We cannot ensure that we will be able to extend the maturity of these credit facilities or arrange another facility on acceptable terms or at all. Our investments in our homebuilding subsidiaries have contributed to our historical growth and similar investments may be a component of our growth strategy in the future. We may make additional strategic investments, enter into new joint venture or partnership arrangements or acquire businesses, some of which may be significant. These endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from current operations, significant start-up costs, insufficient revenues to offset expenses associated with these new investments and inadequate return of capital on these investments, any of which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our failure to successfully identify and manage future investments, joint ventures, partnerships or acquisitions could harm our results of operations. We may be unable to obtain suitable bonding for the development of our housing projects. We are periodically required to provide bonds to governmental authorities and others to ensure the completion of our projects. Depending on market conditions, surety providers may be reluctant to issue new bonds and may request credit enhancements (such as cash deposits or letters of credit) in order to maintain existing bonds or to issue new bonds. If we are unable to obtain required bonds for our future projects, or if we are required to provide credit enhancements with respect to our current or future bonds, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital could result in an inability to acquire land for our developments or increased costs and delays in the completion of development projects. The homebuilding industry is capital-intensive and requires significant up- front expenditures to acquire land parcels and begin development. Land acquisition, development and construction activities may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost of financing or the unwillingness of third parties to engage in partnerships, joint ventures or other alternative arrangements. Furthermore, in the future, we may seek additional capital in the form of equity or debt financing from a variety of potential sources, including additional bank financings and/or securities offerings. The availability of borrowed funds, especially for land acquisition and construction financing, may be greatly reduced nationally, and the lending community may require increased amounts of equity to be invested in a project by borrowers in connection with both new loans and the extension of existing loans. The credit and capital markets are subject to volatility. If we are required to seek additional financing to fund our operations, volatility in these markets may restrict our flexibility to access such financing. If we are not successful in obtaining sufficient capital to fund our planned capital and other expenditures, we may be unable to acquire land for our housing developments and/or to develop the housing. Any difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital for planned development expenditures could also cause project delays and any such delay could result in cost increases. Any one or more of the foregoing events could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Our debt instruments contain limitations and restrictions that could prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and could adversely affect our growth. Our revolving credit facilities and the terms of our senior unsecured notes impose certain restrictions on our and certain of our subsidiaries’ operations and activities and require us to maintain certain financial covenants. The most significant restrictions relate to debt incurrence (including non-recourse indebtedness), creation of liens, repayment of certain indebtedness prior to its respective stated maturity, sales of assets, cash distributions, (including paying dividends), capital stock repurchases, and investments by us and certain of our subsidiaries. These restrictions may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and could adversely affect our growth. The restrictions in our debt instruments could prohibit or restrict our and certain of our subsidiaries’ activities, such as undertaking capital raising or restructuring activities or entering into other transactions. In addition, if we fail to comply with these restrictions, an event of default could occur and our debt under these debt instruments could become due and payable prior 45 to maturity. Any such event of default could lead to cross defaults under certain of our other debt or negatively impact other covenants. In any of these situations, we may be unable to amend the applicable instrument or obtain a waiver without significant additional cost, or at all. Any such situation could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. We are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which may increase our costs, limit the areas in which we can build homes and develop land and delay completion of our projects. We are subject to a variety of local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding or development site vary according to multiple factors, including the site’s location, its environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site, as well as adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs and can prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding and land development activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas. In addition, in those cases where an endangered or threatened species is involved, environmental rules and regulations can result in the restriction or elimination of development in identified environmentally sensitive areas. From time to time, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and similar federal or state agencies review homebuilders’ compliance with environmental laws and may levy fines and penalties for failure to comply strictly with applicable environmental laws or impose additional requirements for future compliance as a result of past failures. Any such actions taken with respect to our business may increase our costs. Environmental regulations can also have an adverse impact on the availability and price of certain raw materials such as lumber. Further, we expect that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on homebuilders and land developers in the future. Under various environmental laws, current or former owners of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for related damages, including for bodily injury, and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. A major health and safety incident relating to our business could be costly in terms of potential liabilities and reputational damage. Building sites are inherently dangerous, and operating in the land development 46 and homebuilding industries poses certain inherent health and safety risks. Due to health and safety regulatory requirements, health and safety performance is critical to the success of our business. Any failure in health and safety performance may result in penalties for non-compliance with relevant regulatory requirements, and a failure that results in a major or significant health and safety incident is likely to be costly in terms of potential liabilities incurred as a result. Such a failure could generate significant negative publicity and have a corresponding impact on our reputation, our relationships with relevant regulatory agencies or governmental authorities and our ability to attract employees, subcontractors and homebuyers, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Poor relations with the residents of our communities, or with local real estate agents, could negatively impact our home sales, which could cause our revenues or results of operations to decline. Residents of communities we develop rely on us to resolve issues or disputes that may arise in connection with the operation or development of their communities. Efforts made by us to resolve these issues or disputes could be deemed unsatisfactory by the affected residents and subsequent actions by these residents could adversely affect sales or our reputation. In addition, we could be required to make material expenditures related to the settlement of such issues or disputes or to modify community development plans, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Most of our potential homebuyers engage local real estate agents who are unaffiliated with us in connection with their search for a new home. If we do not maintain good relations with, and a good reputation among, these real estate agents, the agents may not encourage potential homebuyers to consider, or may actively discourage homebuyers from considering, our communities, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Information technology failures and data security breaches could harm our business. We use information technology and other computer resources to carry out operational and marketing activities, as well as to maintain our business records. As part of our normal business activities, we may collect and store certain confidential information, including information about employees, homebuyers, customers, vendors and suppliers and may share information with vendors who assist us with certain aspects of our business. Many of these resources are provided to us and/or maintained on our behalf by third-party service providers pursuant to agreements that specify certain security and service level standards. Our ability to conduct our business may be impaired if these resources are compromised, degraded, damaged or fail, whether due to a virus or other harmful circumstance, intentional penetration or disruption of our information technology resources by a third- party, natural disaster, hardware or software corruption or failure or error (including a failure of security controls incorporated into or applied to such hardware or software), telecommunications system failure, service provider error or failure, intentional or unintentional personnel actions (including the failure to follow our security protocols) or lost connectivity to networked resources. Breaches of our data security systems, including by cyber-attacks, could result in the unintended public disclosure or the misappropriation of our proprietary information or personal and confidential information, about our employees, consumers who view our homes, homebuyers or business partners, requiring us to incur significant expense to address and resolve such issues. The release of confidential information may also lead to identity theft and related fraud, litigation or other proceedings against us by affected individuals and/or business partners and/or regulators, and the outcome of such proceedings, which could include penalties or fines, and any significant disruption of our business could have a material and adverse effect on our reputation and cause us to lose homebuyers, customers, sales and revenue. We maintain insurance coverage for potential breaches but the costs to remedy a breach may not be fully covered by our insurance. We provide employee awareness training of cybersecurity threats and utilize information technology security experts to assist us in our evaluations of the effectiveness of the security of our information technology systems, and we regularly enhance our security measures to protect our systems and data. We use various encryption, tokenization and authentication technologies to mitigate cybersecurity risks and have increased our monitoring capabilities to enhance early detection and rapid response to potential cyber threats. Product liability claims and litigation and warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of business may be costly, which could adversely affect our business. As a homebuilder, we are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be costly. In addition, the costs of insuring against construction defect and product liability claims are high. This coverage may be restricted and become more costly in the future. If the limits or coverages of our current and former insurance programs prove inadequate, or we are not able to obtain adequate, or reasonably priced, insurance against these types of claims in the future, or the amounts currently provided for future warranty or insurance claims are inadequate, we may experience losses that could negatively impact our financial results. Our business is seasonal in nature, so our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate. The homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly results of operations and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes five to nine months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders convert to home deliveries. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occurs during the second half of the year. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although we may also be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry. Additionally, weather-related problems may occur, delaying starts or closings or increasing costs and reducing profitability. In addition, delays in opening new communities or new sections of existing communities could have an adverse impact on home sales and revenues. Expenses are not incurred and recognized evenly throughout the year. Because of these factors, our quarterly results of operations may be uneven and may be marked by lower revenues and earnings in some quarters compared with others. Shortages or extreme fluctuation in availability of natural resources and utilities could have an adverse effect on our operations. The markets in which we operate may in the future be subject to utility or other resource shortages, including significant changes to the availability of electricity and water. Shortages of natural resources in our markets, particularly of water, may make it more difficult for us to obtain regulatory approval of new developments. We may experience material fluctuations in utility and resource costs across our markets, and we may incur additional costs and may not be able to complete construction on a timely basis if such 47 fluctuations arise. Furthermore, these shortages and interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect the regional economies in which we operate, which may reduce demand for our homes, lots and construction loans and negatively affect our business and results of operations. Our business and financial results could be adversely affected by the failure of persons who act on our behalf to comply with applicable regulations and guidelines. Although we expect all of our employees, officers and directors to comply at all times with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, there may be instances in which subcontractors or others through whom we do business engage in practices that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines. Should we learn of practices relating to homes we build, lots we develop or financing we provide that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines, we would move actively to stop the non-complying practices as soon as possible and would take disciplinary action with regard to employees who were aware of the practices and did not take steps to address them, including in some instances terminating their employment. However, regardless of the steps we take after we learn of practices that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines, we can in some instances be subject to fines or other governmental penalties, and our reputation can be injured, due to the practices having taken place. We may suffer uninsured losses or suffer material losses in excess of insurance limits. We could suffer physical damage to property or incur liabilities resulting in losses that may not be fully recoverable by insurance. In addition, certain types of risks, such as personal injury claims, may be, or may become in the future, either uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may not be currently or in the future covered by our insurance policies or otherwise be subject to significant deductibles or limits. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur or be subject to deductibles, we could sustain financial loss or lose capital invested in the affected property as well as anticipated future income from that property. In addition, we could be liable to repair damage or meet liabilities caused by risks that are uninsured or subject to deductibles. We may be liable for any debt or other financial obligations related to affected property. Material losses or liabilities in excess of insurance proceeds may occur in the future. Products supplied to us and work done by subcontractors can expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business. We rely on subcontractors to perform the actual construction of our homes, and, in some cases, to select and obtain building materials. Despite our detailed specifications and quality control procedures, in some cases, subcontractors may use improper construction processes or defective materials. Defective products widely used by the homebuilding industry can result in the need to perform extensive repairs to large numbers of homes. The cost of complying with our warranty obligations may be significant if we are unable to recover the cost of repairs from subcontractors, materials suppliers and insurers. Laws and regulations governing the residential mortgage industry could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results. In 2018, we established a joint venture, Green Brick Mortgage, to provide mortgage related services to homebuyers. The residential mortgage lending industry remains under intense scrutiny and is heavily regulated at the federal, state and local levels. Although we do not originate mortgages, we are directly or indirectly subject to certain of these regulations. Changes to existing laws or regulations or adoption of new laws or regulations could require our joint venture to incur significant compliance costs. A material failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could result in the loss or suspension of required licenses or other approvals, the imposition of monetary penalties, and restitution awards or other relief. Any of these outcomes could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock The price of our common stock may continue to be volatile. The trading price of our common stock is highly volatile and could be subject to future fluctuations in response to a number of factors beyond our control. In recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause declines in the market price of our common stock. The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our company or its performance, and those fluctuations could materially reduce our common stock price. If we fail to meet expectations 48 related to future growth, profitability or other market expectations, our stock price may decline significantly, which could have a material adverse impact on investor confidence and our stock price. Certain large stockholders own a significant percentage of our shares and exert significant influence over us. Their interests may not coincide with ours and they may make decisions with which we may disagree. Greenlight Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (“Greenlight”) and James R. Brickman own approximately 48% and 4%, respectively, of the voting power of the Company. These large stockholders, acting together, could determine substantially all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a sale or other change of control transaction. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of our company and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our interests as a company or the interests of other stockholders. Accordingly, these stockholders could cause us to enter into transactions or agreements that you would not approve or make decisions with which you may disagree. We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors (“BOD”) and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, levels of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends or contained in our financing instruments and other considerations that the BOD deems relevant. Investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize a return on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock. Certain large stockholders’ shares may be sold into the market in the future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease significantly. We believe that all or a significant portion of our common stock beneficially owned by Greenlight and Mr. Brickman are “restricted securities” within the meaning of the federal securities laws because they were acquired from us on a private, non-registered basis. We have entered into registration rights agreements with each of these parties, however, that gives these parties the right to require us to register the resale of their shares under certain circumstances. If these holders sell substantial amounts of these shares, the price of our common stock could decline. In addition, the sale of these shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES We lease our principal executive office located at 2805 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400, Plano, Texas, 75093. Our homebuilding and title division offices are located in leased space in the markets where we conduct business. We believe that such properties are suitable and adequate to meet the needs of our businesses. Because of the nature of our homebuilding operations, we and our builders hold significant amounts of property as inventory in connection with our homebuilding business. We discuss these properties in the discussion of our homebuilding operations in Part I, Item 1 and Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We are involved in various claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that any such claims and litigation will have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial position. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not Applicable. 49 PART II FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Market Information Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “GRBK”. Holders of Record On March 2, 2020, there were 27 stockholders of record of our common stock. We believe the number of beneficial owners of our common stock is substantially greater than the number of record holders because a large portion of our outstanding common stock is held of record in broker “street names” for the benefit of individual investors. As of March 2, 2020, there were 50,488,010 common shares outstanding. Dividends We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently anticipate that we will retain all of our available cash for general corporate purposes. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our BOD and will depend on many factors, including general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, legal requirements and other factors as our BOD deems relevant. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Not applicable to smaller reporting companies. 50 This annual report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements concern expectations, beliefs, projections, plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements typically include the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “consider,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “objective,” “plan,” “predict,” “projection,” “seek,” “strategy,” “target,” “will” or other words of similar meaning. Some of them are opinions formed based upon general observations, anecdotal evidence and industry experience, but that are not supported by specific investigation or analysis. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include statements concerning our belief that we have ample liquidity; our goals and strategies and their anticipated benefits; our intentions and the expected benefits and advantages of our product and land positioning strategies; our exposure to supplier concentration risk; our delivery of substantially all of our backlog existing as of year end; our positions and our expected outcome relating to litigation in general; the sufficiency of our warranty accruals; our intentions to not pay dividends; expectations regarding our industry and our business into 2020 and beyond, the demand for and the pricing of our homes; our land and lot acquisition strategy and potential expansion into new markets; the availability of labor and materials for our operations; the sufficiency of our insurance coverage and warranty accruals; the sufficiency of our capital resources to support our business strategy; our balance sheet strategy; the sufficiency of our land pipeline; the impact of new accounting standards and changes in accounting estimates; trends and expectations regarding sales prices, sales orders, cancellations, construction costs, gross margins, land costs and profitability and future home inventories; the impact of January and February 2020 sales on future results; our future cash needs; the impact of seasonality; and our future compliance with debt covenants. These statements are necessarily subjective and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements described in or implied by such statements. Actual results may differ materially from expected results described in our forward-looking statements, including with respect to correct measurement and identification of factors affecting our business or the extent of their likely impact, the accuracy and completeness of the publicly available information with respect to the factors upon which our business strategy is based or the success of our business. In addition, even if results are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, those results may not be indicative of ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For business overview and developments during the year ended December 31, 2019, refer to Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Overview and Outlook Our key financial and operating metrics are home deliveries, home closings revenue, average sales price of homes delivered, and net new home orders, which refers to sales contracts executed reduced by the number of sales contracts canceled during the relevant period. During the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018: •Home deliveries increased by 33.6% •Home closings revenue increased by 31.7% •Average sales price of homes delivered decreased by 1.4% •Net new home orders increased by 37.7% From December 2018 to December 2019, homes in the Dallas and Atlanta markets appreciated by 2.6% and 4.1%, respectively (Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices & CoreLogic, December 2019). We believe that we operate in two of the most desirable housing markets in the nation. Among the 12 largest metropolitan areas in the country, the Dallas area ranked first and the Atlanta area ranked fifth in the annual rate of job growth from November 2018 to November 2019 (Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, November 2019). We believe that increasing demand and supply constraints in our target markets create favorable conditions for our future growth. results or developments in subsequent periods. Furthermore, industry forecasts are likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time and in industries particularly sensitive to market conditions such as land development, homebuilding and builder financing. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. We wish to caution readers that certain important factors may have affected and could in the future affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ significantly from what is anticipated by our forward-looking statements. The most important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: slowdowns in the real estate markets across the nation, including a slowdown in real estate markets in regions where we have significant homebuilding or multifamily development activities; increases in operating costs, including costs related to labor, construction materials, real estate taxes and insurance, which exceed our ability to increase prices; our inability to successfully execute our strategies; changes in general economic and financial conditions that reduce demand for our homes and finished lots, lower our profit margins or reduce our access to credit; our inability to acquire land at anticipated prices; the possibility that we will incur nonrecurring costs that affect earnings in one or more reporting periods; decreased demand for our homes and finished lots; increased competition for home sales from other sellers of new and resale homes; increases in mortgage interest rates or tightening of mortgage lending practices; a decline in the value of our inventories and resulting write-downs of the carrying value of our real estate assets; the failure of the controlled builders or third parties with whom we enter into joint ventures, partnerships or other strategic investments; participants in various joint ventures to honor their commitments; difficulty obtaining land-use entitlements or construction financing; natural disasters and other unforeseen events for which our insurance does not provide adequate coverage; new laws or regulatory changes that adversely affect the profitability of our businesses; our inability to refinance our debt as it matures on terms that are acceptable to us; and changes in accounting standards that adversely affect our reported earnings or financial condition. Please see “Risk Factors” located in Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties which could affect our future results. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of those statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except to the extent we are legally required to disclose certain matters in SEC filings or otherwise. 51 Results of Operations New Home Orders and Backlog Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018 The table below represents new home orders and backlog related to our builder operations segments, excluding mechanic’s liens contracts (dollars in thousands): Residential Units Revenue and New Homes Delivered The table below represents residential units revenue and new homes delivered for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Change % Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Change % Net new home orders 1,923 1,397 526 37.7% Cancellation rate 12.9% 14.9% (2.0)% (13.4)% Absorption rate per average active selling community per quarter Average active selling communities Active selling communities at end of period 5.6 86 95 5.3 66 76 0.3 5.7% 20 19 30.3% 25.0% Home closings revenue $752,273 $571,177 $181,096 31.7% Backlog $346,828 $264,275 $82,553 31.2% Mechanic’s lien contracts revenue 7,557 7,716 (159) (2.1)% Backlog (units) 786 582 204 35.1% Residential units revenue $759,830 $578,893 $180,937 31.3% Average sales price of backlog $441.3 $454.1 $(12.8) (2.8)% New homes delivered 1,719 1,287 432 33.6% Average sales price of homes delivered $437.6 443.8 (6.2) (1.4)% The $180.9 million increase in residential units revenue was driven by the 33.6% increase in the number of homes delivered, which was primarily due to an organic increase in the number of active selling communities during the year ended December 31, 2019, as well as the acquisition of GRBK GHO in April 2018. The 1.4% decline in the average sales price of homes delivered for the year ended December 31, 2019 was attributable to a change in product mix. Backlog refers to homes under sales contracts that have not yet closed at the end of the relevant period, and absorption rate refers to the rate at which net new home orders are contracted per average active selling community during the relevant period. Upon a cancellation, the escrow deposit may be returned to the prospective purchaser. Accordingly, backlog may not be indicative of our future revenue. Our cancellation rate, which refers to sales contracts canceled divided by sales contracts executed during the relevant period, was 12.9% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 14.9% for the year ended December 31, 2018. Sales contracts relating to homes in backlog may be canceled by the prospective purchaser for a number of reasons, such as the prospective purchaser’s inability to obtain suitable mortgage financing. Upon a cancellation, the escrow deposit may be returned to the prospective purchaser. Accordingly, backlog may not be indicative of our future revenue. Management believes a cancellation rate in the range of 15% to 20% is representative of an industry average cancellation rate. Our cancellation rate is on the lower end of the industry average, which we believe is due to our target buyer demographics which generally have not included a significant amount of the first time homebuyers through December 31, 2019. 52 Residential Units Gross Margin Land and Lots Revenue The table below represents the components of residential units gross margin (dollars in thousands): The table below represents lots closed and land and lots revenue (dollars in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Change % Home closings revenue $752,273 100.0% $571,177 100.0% Lots revenue $31,820 $35,074 $(3,254) (9.3)% Cost of homebuilding units 591,321 78.6% 427,164 74.8% Land revenue 10 9,680 (9,670) (99.9)% Homebuilding gross margin $160,952 21.4% $144,013 25.2% Land and lots revenue $31,830 $44,754 $(12,924) (28.9)% Mechanic’s lien contracts revenue $7,557 100.0% $7,716 100.0% Cost of mechanic’s lien contracts 6,563 86.8% 6,115 79.3% Mechanic’s lien contracts gross margin $994 13.2% $1,601 20.7% Residential units revenue $759,830 100.0% $578,893 100.0% Cost of residential units 597,884 78.7% 433,279 74.8% Residential units gross margin $161,946 21.3% $145,614 25.2% Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, the Company reclassified its sales commission expenses from cost of residential units to selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income in order to be more comparable with a majority of its peers. Sales commission expenses represented 4.2% and 4.1% of the residential units revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Cost of residential units for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased by $164.6 million, or 38.0%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the 33.6% increase in the number of new homes delivered, a change in mix of homes delivered, and a decrease in the number of homes built on self-developed lots. Residential units gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased to 21.3%, compared to 25.2% for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily because of lower initial prices on new communities opened and increases in sales incentives to customers. Such sales incentives have contributed to an overall 31.3% increase in residential units revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Lots closed 211 239 (28) (11.7)% Average sales price of lots closed $150.8 $146.8 $4.0 2.7% The 9.3% decrease in lots revenue was driven by the 11.7% decrease in the number of lots closed, which was due to us retaining more lots for our builders, partially offset by the 2.7% increase in the average lot price. The decrease in land revenue is due to the lower volume of land sold during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Selling, General and Administrative Expense The table below represents the components of selling, general and administrative expense (dollars in thousands): Years Ended December 31, As Percentage of Segment Revenue 2019 2018 2019 2018 Builder operations $94,520 $73,037 12.4% 12.5% Land development 1,730 3,147 5.6% 7.9% Corporate and other unallocat- ed Total selling, general and administrative expense 2,409 4,518 —% —% $98,659 $80,702 12.5% 12.9% The 0.4% decrease of total selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue was driven by an increase in expenditures to support the growth in home sales, more than offset by an increase in revenues and in capitalized overhead adjustments. 53 Builder Operations Other Income, Net Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue for builder operations remained relatively flat. Builder operations expenditures include salary expenses, sales commissions, and community costs such as advertising and marketing expenses, rent, professional fees, and non- capitalized property taxes. Other income, net, increased to $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to approximately $5.0 million in forfeited deposit monies on the sale of finished lots and an increase in title closing and settlement services. Land Development Income Tax Expense The 2.3% decrease in selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue for land development was primarily driven by an increase in capitalized property taxes during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Corporate, Other and Unallocated Selling, general and administrative expense for the corporate, other and unallocated non-operating segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $2.4 million, compared to $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, the decrease driven primarily by transaction expenses related to a public secondary offering of the Company’s shares in 2018 and an increase in capitalized overhead adjustments that are not allocated to builder operations and land development segments. Income tax expense increased to $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $17.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, driven by the increase in the projected effective tax rate, which was primarily attributable to the decrease in tax benefits related to noncontrolling interests and an increase in state income taxes. As of December 31, 2019, all federal net operating loss carryforwards were fully utilized. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company decided to write off its gross state net operating loss carryforwards in Minnesota of $13.7 million, as well as the related deferred tax asset and valuation allowance. Management believes on a more-likely-than-not basis that the Minnesota net operating loss carryforwards would not have been utilized. Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Entities Equity in income of unconsolidated entities increased to $9.8 million, or 35.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase in earnings from GB Challenger, LLC and the formation of Green Brick Mortgage. Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2017 For discussion and analysis of the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 as well as for comparison to the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017, refer to Item 7 of Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. 54 Lots Owned and Controlled The following table presents the lots we owned or controlled, including lot option contracts, as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Owned lots are those for which we hold title, while controlled lots are lots past feasibility studies for which we do not hold title but have the contractual right to acquire title. December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Lots owned Central Southeast Total lots owned Lots controlled Central Southeast Total lots controlled Total lots owned and controlled (1) Percentage of lots owned 4,223 2,196 6,419 1,410 1,147 2,557 8,976 71.5% 4,447 1,788 6,235 853 990 1,843 8,078 77.2% * Total lots excludes lots with homes under construction. The increase in the number of lots controlled is related to the formation of Trophy in Dallas in September 2018. Liquidity and Capital Resources Overview As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had $33.3 million and $38.3 million of unrestricted cash, respectively. Management believes that we have a prudent cash management strategy, including consideration of cash outlays for land and lot acquisition and development. We intend to generate and redeploy net cash from the sale of inventory to acquire and develop land and lots that represent opportunities to generate desired margins. We may also use cash to make additional investments in business acquisitions, joint ventures, or other strategic activities. Our principal uses of capital for the year ended December 31, 2019 were home construction, land purchases, land development, operating expenses, and payment of routine liabilities. We used funds generated by operations and available borrowings to meet our short-term working capital requirements. We remain focused on generating positive margins in our builder operations segments and acquiring desirable land positions in order to maintain a strong balance sheet and remain poised for continued growth. Cash flows for each of our communities depend on the community’s stage in the development cycle and can differ substantially from reported earnings. Early stages of development or expansion require significant cash outlays for land acquisitions, entitlements and other approvals, roads, utilities, general landscaping and other amenities. These costs are a component of our inventory and are not recognized in our statement of income until a home closes. In the later stages of community development, cash inflows may significantly exceed earnings reported for financial statement purposes, as the cash outflows associated with home construction and land development previously occurred. Our debt to total capitalization ratio, which is calculated as the sum of borrowings on lines of credit and the senior unsecured notes, net of debt issuance costs, divided by the total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity, was approximately 31.3% as of December 31, 2019. It is our intent to prudently employ leverage to continue to invest in our land acquisition, development and homebuilding businesses. We target a debt to total capitalization ratio of approximately 30% to 35%, which we expect will continue to provide us with significant additional growth capital. The Company’s key sources of liquidity were funds generated by operations and provided by lines of credit and issuance of senior unsecured notes during the year ended December 31, 2019. Borrowings on lines of credit outstanding, net of debt issuance costs, as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands): Secured revolving credit facility $38,000 $46,500 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Unsecured revolving credit facility 128,000 155,500 Debt issuance costs, net of amortization (1,358) (1,614) Total borrowings on lines of credit, net $164,642 $200,386 55 Borrowings on the secured revolving credit facility have a maturity date of May 1, 2022 and bear interest at a floating rate per annum equal to the rate announced by Bank of America, N.A. as its “Prime Rate” less 0.25%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the interest may not, at any time, be less than 4% per annum or more than the lesser amount of 18% and the highest maximum rate allowed by applicable law. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility was 4.50% per annum. December 31, 2019 were primarily driven by an increase in inventory of $84.0 million, a decrease in customer and builder deposits of $8.0 million, a decrease in accrued expenses of $4.4 million, an increase in other assets of $1.5 million, and a $1.3 million payment of contingent consideration related to the acquisition of GRBK GHO in excess of acquisition date fair value, partially offset by $71.0 million of cash generated from business operations, a $4.0 million increase in accounts payable and a $2.1 million decrease in earnest money deposits. Borrowings on the unsecured revolving credit facility have a maturity date of December 14, 2021 for $17.9 million and December 14, 2022 for $110.1 million, respectively, and bear interest at a floating rate equal to either (a) for base rate advances, the highest of (1) the lender’s base rate, (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and (3) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%, in each case plus 1.5%; or (b) in the case of Eurodollar rate advances, the reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 2.5%. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings under the unsecured revolving credit facility ranged from 4.25% to 4.30% per annum. Senior unsecured notes, net of debt issuance costs, were $73.4 million and $0.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Principal on the senior unsecured notes is required to be paid in increments of $12.5 million on August 8, 2024 and $12.5 million on August 8, 2025. The final principal payment of $50.0 million is due on August 8, 2026. Optional prepayment is allowed with payment of a “make-whole” premium which fluctuates depending on market interest rates. Interest, which accrues at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, is payable quarterly in arrears commencing November 8, 2019. • Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased to $7.9 million compared to $30.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The $23.0 million decrease in cash outflows was primarily attributable to the acquisition of GRBK GHO during the year ended December 31, 2018, partially offset by the $5.3 million investment in EJB River Holdings joint venture during the year ended December 31, 2019. • Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $25.9 million, compared to $71.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily due to borrowings on lines of credit of $224.0 million and borrowings from senior unsecured notes of $75.0 million, partially offset by $260.0 million of repayments of lines of credit and $11.5 million of distributions to noncontrolling interests partners. For discussion and analysis of the Company’s cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018 as well as for comparison to the Company’s cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, refer to Item 7 of Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. For more detailed information on the Company’s lines of credit, refer to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements located in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Cash Flows Land and Lot Option Contracts The following summarizes our primary sources and uses of cash for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018: • Operating activities. Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $22.1 million, compared to $39.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The net cash outflows for the year ended In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land purchase contracts with third-party developers in order to procure lots for the construction of our homes in the future. We are subject to customary obligations associated with such contracts. These purchase contracts typically require an earnest money deposit, and the purchase of properties under these contracts is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements, including obtaining applicable property and development entitlements. 56 We also utilize option contracts with lot sellers as a method of acquiring lots in staged takedowns, which are the schedules that dictate when lots must be purchased to help manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings, and to reduce the use of funds from our corporate financing sources. Lot option contracts generally require us to pay a non-refundable deposit for the right to acquire lots over a specified period of time at pre- determined prices which typically include escalations in lot prices over time. Our utilization of lot option contracts is dependent on, among other things, the availability of land sellers willing to enter into these arrangements, the availability of capital to finance the development of optioned lots, general housing market conditions and local market dynamics. Options may be more difficult to procure from land sellers in strong housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions. We generally have the right, at our discretion, to terminate our obligations under both purchase contracts and option contracts by forfeiting the earnest money deposit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had earnest money deposits of $17.3 million at risk associated with contracts to purchase 2,557 lots past feasibility studies with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $189.8 million. Deposits and pre-acquisition costs written off related to option contracts abandoned totaled $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds Refer to Note 17 in the accompanying Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details of letters of credit and performance bonds outstanding. Guarantee Refer to Note 3 in the accompanying Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details of our guarantee in relation to EJB River Holdings joint venture. Critical Accounting Policies The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to use judgment and make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, costs and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the following accounting area is most critical to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and requires the most subjective or complex judgments. Impairment of Inventory The Company values inventory at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”), we evaluate our inventory for indicators of impairment by individual community and development during each reporting period. For our builder operations segments, management reviews community gross margins, levels of completed speculative home units, quantities of lots not started, and community outlook factors. In the event that this review suggests higher potential for losses at a specific community, the Company monitors such communities by adding them to its “watchlist” communities, and, when an impairment indicator is present, further analysis is performed. For our land development segment, we perform a quarterly review for indicators of impairment for each project which involves projecting future lot closings based on executed contracts and comparing these anticipated revenues to projected costs. In determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel, we rely on project budgets which are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about development schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is common that actual results differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including delays, changes in costs that have not been committed, unforeseen issues encountered during project development that fall outside the scope of existing contracts, or items that ultimately cost more or less than the budgeted amount. We apply procedures to maintain best estimates in our budgets, including assessing and revising project budgets on a periodic basis, obtaining commitments 57 from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs. that could have an impact on sales pace, sales price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property. Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales absorption rates has a direct impact on the estimated per unit sales price of a home, the level of time-sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and carrying costs), and selling and marketing costs (such as model home maintenance costs and advertising costs). Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the volatility in demand for new housing and the long life cycle of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. Refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further description of the Company’s significant accounting policies. Recent Accounting Pronouncements See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for recent accounting pronouncements. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Not applicable to smaller reporting companies. For each real estate asset that has an indicator of impairment, we analyze whether the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows are more or less than the asset’s carrying value. The estimated cash flows are determined by projecting the remaining revenue from closings based on the contractual lot takedowns remaining or historical and projected home sales or delivery absorptions for homebuilding operations and then comparing such projections to the remaining projected expenditures for development or home construction. Remaining projected expenditures are based on the most current pricing/bids received from subcontractors for current phases or homes under development. For future phases of land development, management uses its judgment to project potential cost increases. When projecting revenue, management does not assume improvement in market conditions. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and will be written down to fair value less associated costs to sell. These impairment evaluations require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including the timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if expected future cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development activities, construction and delivery timelines, market risk of price erosion, uncertainty of development or construction cost increases, and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities. When estimating cash flows of a community, management makes various assumptions, including: (i) expected sales prices and sales incentives to be offered, including the number of homes available, pricing and incentives being offered by us or other builders, and future sales price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred including, but not limited to, land and land development costs, home construction costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered 58 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Green Brick Partners, Inc. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Green Brick Partners, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ RSM US LLP We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016. Dallas, Texas March 6, 2020 59 Green Brick Partners, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (In Thousands, Except Share Data) As of December 31, Assets Cash Restricted cash Receivables Inventory Investments in unconsolidated entities Right-of-use assets - operating leases Property and equipment, net Earnest money deposits Deferred income tax assets, net Intangible assets, net Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued expenses Customer and builder deposits Lease liabilities - operating leases Borrowings on lines of credit, net Senior unsecured notes, net Contingent consideration Total liabilities Commitments and contingencies Liabilities and Equity Redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary Equity: Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; 50,879,949 and 50,719,884 issued and 50,488,010 and 50,583,128 outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively Treasury stock, at cost, 391,939 and 136,756 shares as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity Noncontrolling interests Total equity Total liabilities and equity 60 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2019 2018 $33,269 $38,315 4,416 4,720 3,440 4,842 753,567 668,961 30,294 20,269 3,462 4,309 14,686 15,262 707 680 — 4,690 16,793 16,499 856 680 10,167 8,681 $875,539 $784,026 $30,044 $26,091 24,656 23,954 3,564 29,201 31,978 — 164,642 200,386 73,406 5,267 — 2,207 325,533 289,863 13,611 8,531 - 509 (3,167) - 507 (981) 290,799 291,299 235,027 177,526 523,168 468,351 13,227 17,281 536,395 485,632 $ 875,539 $784,026 Green Brick Partners, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Income (In Thousands, Except Share Data) Southgate Homes, The Village at Twin Creeks Allen, TX Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue Total revenues Cost of residential units Cost of land and lots Total cost of revenues Total gross profit Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $759,830 $578,893 $439,520 31,830 44,754 18,730 791,660 623,647 458,250 597,884 433,279 325,934 24,694 36,166 13,856 622,578 469,445 339,790 169,082 154,202 118,460 Selling, general and administrative expense 98,659 80,702 58,442 Change in fair value of contingent consideration Equity in income of unconsolidated entities Other income, net 4,906 9,809 9,003 1,693 7,259 2,605 — 2,746 1,473 Income before income taxes 84,329 81,671 64,237 Income tax expense Net income Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 20,027 64,302 5,646 17,136 64,535 12,912 39,031 25,206 10,236 Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. $58,656 $51,623 $14,970 Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share: Basic Diluted $1.16 $1.16 $1.02 $1.02 $0.30 $0.30 Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share: Basic Diluted 50,530 50,636 50,652 50,751 49,597 49,683 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 61 Green Brick Partners, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (In Thousands, Except Share Data) Common Stock Treasury Stock Shares Ammount Shares Ammount Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Stockholders’ Equity Balance at December 31, 2016 48,955,909 $490 Share-based compensation Issuance of common stock under 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan Withholdings from vesting of restricted stock awards Amortization of deferred share-based compensation — 229,049 (63,057) — Common stock issued in connection with the investment in Challenger 1,477,000 Common stock issuable in connection with the investment in Challenger Contributions Distributions Net income — — — — — 2 (1) — 15 — — — — Balance at December 31, 2017 50,598,901 $506 Share-based compensation Issuance of common stock under 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan Withholdings from vesting of restricted stock awards Amortization of deferred share-based compensation Common stock issued in connection with the investment in Challenger Stock repurchases Contributions Distributions Net income — 140,211 (39,228) — 20,000 — — — — — 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (136,756) (981) — — — — — — $273,149 $110,933 $384,572 $16,913 $401,485 289 1,924 (585) 356 14,607 198 — — — — — — — — — — — 289 1,926 (586) 356 14,622 198 — — — — — — — — 438 289 1,926 (586) 356 14,622 198 438 (10,896) (10,896) 14,970 14,970 10,236 25,206 $289,938 $125,903 $416,347 $16,691 $433,038 288 1,081 (412) 404 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 288 1,082 (412) 404 — (981) — — — — — — — — 5 288 1,082 (412) 404 — (981) 5 (10,747) (10,747) 51,623 51,623 11,332 62,955 Balance at December 31, 2018 50,719,884 $507 (136,756) (981) $291,299 $177,526 $468,351 $17,281 $485,632 62 Green Brick Partners, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (In Thousands, Except Share Data) Common Stock Treasury Stock Shares Ammount Shares Ammount Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Stockholders’ Equity Balance at December 31, 2018 50,719,884 $507 (136,756) (981) $291,299 $177,526 $468,351 $17,281 $485,632 Share-based compensation Issuance of common stock under 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan Withholdings from vesting of restricted stock awards Amortization of deferred share-based compensation Stock repurchases Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest Increase in ownership in Southgate Homes Increase in ownership in Centre Living Homes Contributions Distributions Net income — 219,181 (59,116) — — — — — — — — — 3 (1) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (255,183 (2,186) — — — — — — — — — — — — 236 1,463 (543) 489 — (2,145) — — — — — — — — — — — (891) (264) — — 236 1,466 (544) 489 (2,186) (2,145) (891) (264) — — — — — — — — 891 264 236 1,466 (544) 489 (2,186) (2,145) — — 3,600 3,600 (10,993) (10,993) 58,656 58,656 2,184 60,840 Balance at December 31, 2019 50,879,949 $509 (391,939) $(3,167) $290,799 $235,027 $523,168 $13,227 $536,395 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. Trophy Signature Homes, Park West Frisco, TX 63 Green Brick Partners, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In Thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization expense Share-based compensation expense Change in fair value of contingent consideration Deferred income taxes, net Equity in income of unconsolidated entities Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables Increase in inventory Decrease (increase) in earnest money deposits Increase in other assets Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (Decrease) increase in accrued expenses Payment of contingent consideration in excess of acquisition date fair value Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Continued Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Cash flows from financing activities: $64,302 $64,535 $25,206 Borrowings from lines of credit 224,000 165,000 88,500 3,079 2,191 4,906 1,237 (9,809) 5,084 2,943 1,774 1,693 14,712 (7,259) 4,623 Borrowings from senior unsecured notes Payments of debt issuance costs Repayments of lines of credit Repayments of notes payable Payment of contingent consideration Payments of withholding tax on vesting of restricted stock awards 325 2,571 — 36,299 (2,746) 974 Stock repurchases Contributions from noncontrolling interests 75,000 (1,974) — (870) — (809) (260,000) (70,000) (56,500) — (10,226) (1,022) (514) (544) (2,186) 3,600 — (412) (981) 5 — (586) — 438 Distributions to noncontrolling interests (10,993) (10,747) (10,896) 122 (3,029) 843 (83,970) (129,291) (95,452) Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest Net cash provided by financing activities 2,107 2,119 (1,525) (2,741) (483) 9,470 3,953 (4,384) (1,332) (3,097) (1,701) 7,241 4,175 — — Cash, end of period Net (decrease) increase in cash and restricted cash Cash, beginning of period Restricted cash, beginning of period (527) 25,862 (4,070) 38,315 3,440 — — 71,769 1,466 36,684 3,605 19,125 687 35,157 4,445 33,269 4,416 38,315 3,440 36,684 3,605 Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period $41,755 $40,289 $39,602 (Decrease) increase in customer and builder deposits (8,024) 1,458 7,359 Restricted cash, end of period Net cash used in operating activities (22,063) (39,476) (18,003) Cash and restricted cash, end of period $37,685 $41,755 $40,289 Cash flows from investing activities: Business combination, net of acquired cash Investments in unconsolidated entities Purchase of property and equipment Net cash used in investing activities — (26,861) (5,300) (2,569) (755) (3,211) (7,869) (30,827) — (286) (149) (435) Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest — — — Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds $14,313 $4,611 $2,941 Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities: Equity issuance related to investment in unconsolidated entity — — $14,622 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow continued on right The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 64 GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Use of Estimates 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, including the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Principles of Consolidation Reclassifications The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Green Brick Partners, Inc., its controlled subsidiaries, and variable interest entities in which Green Brick Partners, Inc. or one of its controlled subsidiaries is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (together, the “Company”, “we”, or “Green Brick”). The Company evaluated its wholly-owned subsidiaries and controlled builders under ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”) and concluded that each controlled builder is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company owns a 50% percent equity interest and a 51% voting interest in each controlled builder. In addition, the Company appoints two of the three board managers of each controlled builder and is able to exercise control over the operations of each controlled builder. The Company accounts for its controlled builders under the variable interest model and is the primary beneficiary of each controlled builder in accordance with ASC 810. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in unconsolidated entities over which it exercises significant influence but does not have a controlling interest. Under the equity method, the Company’s share of the unconsolidated entities’ earnings or losses is included in the consolidated statements of income. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, the Company reclassified its sales commission expenses from cost of residential units to selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income in order to be more comparable with a majority of its peers. There was no impact on net income from the reclassification in any period. Cash The cash balances of the Company are held with multiple financial institutions. At times, cash balances at certain banks and financial institutions may exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes it mitigates this risk by monitoring the financial stability of institutions holding material cash balances. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes that the risk of loss is minimal. Restricted Cash Restricted cash primarily relates to cash held in escrow for sales of developed lots to third parties and customer deposits from homebuyers. 65 Receivables Receivables consist of amounts collectible from manufacturing rebates earned by our homebuilders during the normal course of business, amounts collectible from third-party escrow agents related to closings on land, lots and homes, amounts collectible related to mechanic’s lien contracts, as well as income tax receivables. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, all amounts are considered fully collectible and no allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded. Any allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on our historical losses, the existing economic conditions, and the financial stability of our customers. Receivables are written off in the period that they are deemed uncollectible. Inventory and Cost of Revenues Inventory consists of undeveloped land, raw land scheduled for development, land in the process of development, land held for sale, developed lots, homes completed and under construction, and model homes. Inventory is valued at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes any related pre-acquisition costs that are directly identifiable with a specific property so long as those pre-acquisition costs are anticipated to be recoverable at the sale of the property. Residential lots held for sale and lots held for development include the initial cost of acquiring the land as well as certain costs capitalized related to developing the land into individual residential lots including direct overhead, interest and real estate taxes. Land development and other project costs, including direct overhead, interest and property taxes incurred during development and home construction, are capitalized. Land development and other common costs that benefit an entire community are allocated to individual lots or homes based on relative sales value. The costs of completed lots are transferred to work in process when home construction begins. Home construction costs and related carrying charges (principally interest and real estate taxes) are allocated to the cost of individual homes. Inventory costs for completed homes are expensed upon closing and delivery of the homes. Changes to estimated total land development costs subsequent to initial home closings in a community are generally allocated to the unclosed homes and lots in the community on a pro-rata basis. The 66 life cycle of a community generally ranges from 2 to 6 years, commencing with the acquisition of land, continuing through the land development phase, construction, and concluding with the sale and delivery of homes. We recognize costs as incurred on our mechanic’s lien contracts. Impairment of Inventory In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”), we evaluate our inventory for indicators of impairment by individual community and development during each reporting period. For our builder operations segments, during each reporting period, community gross margins, levels of completed speculative home units, quantities of lots not started, and community outlook factors are reviewed by management. In the event that this review suggests higher potential for losses at a specific community, the Company monitors such communities by adding them to its “watchlist” communities, and, when an impairment indicator is present, further analysis is performed. For our land development segment, we perform a quarterly review for indicators of impairment for each project which involves projecting future lot closings based on executed contracts and comparing these anticipated revenues to projected costs. In determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel, we rely on project budgets which are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about development schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is common that actual results differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including delays, changes in costs that have not been committed, unforeseen issues encountered during project development that fall outside the scope of existing contracts, or items that ultimately cost more or less than the budgeted amount. We apply procedures to maintain best estimates in our budgets, including assessing and revising project budgets on a periodic basis, obtaining commitments from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs. Each reporting period, management reviews each real estate asset which has an indicator of impairment in order to determine whether the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows are more or less than the asset’s carrying value. The estimated cash flows are determined by projecting the remaining revenue from closings based on the contractual lot takedowns remaining or historical and projected home sales or delivery absorptions for homebuilding operations and then comparing such projections to the remaining projected expenditures for development or home construction. Remaining projected expenditures are based on the most current pricing/ bids received from subcontractors for current phases or homes under development. For future phases of land development, management uses its judgment to project potential cost increases. In determining the estimated cash flows for land held for sale, management considers recent comparisons to market comparable transactions, bona fide letters of intent from outside parties, executed sales contracts, broker quotes, and similar information. When projecting revenue, management does not assume improvement in market conditions. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are more than the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and will be written down to fair value less associated costs to sell. These impairment evaluations require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including the timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if expected future cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development activities, construction and delivery timelines, market risk of price erosion, uncertainty of development or construction cost increases, and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities. When estimating cash flows of a community, management makes various assumptions, including: (i) expected sales prices and sales incentives to be offered, including the number of homes available, pricing and incentives being offered by us or other builders, and future sales price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred including, but not limited to, land and land development costs, home construction costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, sales price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property. Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales absorption rates has a direct impact on the estimated per unit sales price of a home, the level of time-sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and carrying costs), and selling and marketing costs (such as model home maintenance costs and advertising costs). Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the volatility in demand for new housing and the long life cycle of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. Capitalization of Interest The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred to inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Interest capitalized as cost of inventory is charged to cost of revenues as related homes, land and lots are closed. Interest incurred on undeveloped land is directly expensed and included in interest expense in our consolidated statements of income. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities In accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (“ASC 323”), the Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in unconsolidated entities over which it exercises significant influence but does not have a controlling interest. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the unconsolidated entity’s earnings or losses. The Company evaluates the carrying amount of the investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment in accordance with ASC 323. If the Company determines that a loss in the value of the investment is other than temporary, the Company writes down the investment to its estimated fair value. Any such losses are recorded to equity in income of unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and the volatility in demand for new housing, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. The Company has made an election to classify distributions received from unconsolidated entities using the nature of the distribution approach. Distributions received are classified as cash inflows from operating activities based on the nature of the activities of the investee that generated the distribution. 67 Variable Interest Entities The Company accounts for variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in accordance with ASC 810. In accordance with ASC 810, an entity is a VIE when: (a) the equity investment at risk in the entity is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by other parties, including the equity holders; (b) the entity’s equity holders as a group either (i) lack the direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (ii) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (iii) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the entity’s equity holders have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests, and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of the equity holder with disproportionately few voting rights. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE pursuant to ASC 810, the enterprise that has both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or right to receive benefits from the entity that could be potentially significant to the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company performs ongoing reassessments of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The financial statements of the VIEs for which the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary, if any, are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interests attributable to other beneficiaries of the VIEs are included as noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Property and Equipment, Net Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives of assets range from 1 to 15 years. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets In accordance with ASC 360, our property and equipment and right-of-use assets related to operating leases are reviewed for possible impairment if there are indicators that their carrying amounts are not recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from 68 the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Earnest Money Deposits In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land and lot option contracts in order to procure land for the construction of homes in the future. Pursuant to these option contracts, the Company generally provides a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such contracts enable the Company to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties or unconsolidated entities until the Company has determined whether and when to exercise its option, which reduces the Company’s financial risk associated with long-term land holdings. Option deposits and pre-acquisition costs (such as environmental testing, surveys, engineering, and entitlement costs) are capitalized if the costs are directly identifiable with the land under option and acquisition of the property is probable. Such costs are reflected in earnest money deposits and are reclassified to inventory upon taking title to the land. The Company writes off deposits and pre- acquisition costs if it becomes probable that the Company will not proceed with the project or recover the capitalized costs. Such decisions take into consideration changes in local market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the availability and best use of necessary incremental capital, and other factors. Under ASC 810, a non-refundable deposit paid to an entity is deemed to be a variable interest that will absorb some or all of the entity’s expected losses if they occur and, as such, the Company’s land and lot option contracts are considered variable interests. The Company’s option contract deposits along with any related pre-acquisition costs represent the Company’s maximum exposure to the land seller if the Company elects not to purchase the optioned property. Therefore, whenever the Company enters into an option or purchase contract with an entity and makes a non-refundable deposit, a VIE assessment is performed. However, the Company generally has little control or power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance due to the Company’s lack of an equity interest in them. Additionally, creditors of the VIE typically have no material recourse against the Company, and the Company does not provide financial or other support to these VIEs other than as stipulated in the option contracts. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company performs ongoing reassessments of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Intangible Assets Intangible assets, net consists of the estimated fair value of the acquired trade name, net of amortization. The trade name has a definite life and is amortized over ten years. Intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The impairment loss recorded would be the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. Fair value would be determined using a discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation technique. Goodwill The excess of the purchase price of a business acquisition over the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is capitalized as goodwill in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators are present. Goodwill impairment exists when a reporting unit’s goodwill carrying value exceeds its implied fair value. Per ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), an entity may make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying a two-step goodwill impairment test. When performing a qualitative assessment, an entity evaluates relevant events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, overall financial performance, reporting unit specific events and entity specific events. If, after completing a qualitative assessment, an entity concludes that it is not likely that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a two-step impairment test would not be required for that reporting unit. In the event that the conclusion of the qualitative assessment requires the two-step test, the first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and the entity must perform step two of the impairment test. Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, step two is not required. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. If the Company is required to perform the two-step test, it would determine fair value using generally accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. The Company’s valuation methodology for assessing impairment would require management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical experience and projections of future operating performance. If these assumptions differ materially from future results, the Company may record impairment charges in the future. Warranties The Company accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty claims based on both current and historical home closings data and warranty costs incurred. The Company offers homeowners a comprehensive third-party warranty on each home. Homes are generally covered by a ten-year warranty for qualified and defined structural defects, one year for defects and products used, and two years for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning parts and labor. Warranty accruals are included within accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. Any legal costs associated with loss contingencies related to warranties are expensed as incurred. Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs represent costs incurred related to the senior unsecured notes and revolving secured and unsecured credit facilities, including amendments thereto, and reduce the carrying amount of debt on the consolidated balance sheets. These costs are subject to capitalization to inventory over the term of the related debt facility using the straight-line method. 69 Business Combinations Acquisitions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 805. Following the determination that control of a business and its inputs, processes and outputs were obtained in exchange for consideration, all material assets and liabilities of the business, including contingent consideration, are measured and recognized at fair value as of the date of the acquisition to reflect the purchase price. Depending on the fair value of net assets acquired, the purchase price allocation may or may not result in goodwill. and requires third-party builders to submit a deposit in connection with land sale or lot option contracts. The non-refundable deposits serve as an incentive for performance under homebuilding and land sale or development contracts. Cash received as customer deposits, if held in escrow, is reflected as restricted cash and as customer and builder deposits on the consolidated balance sheets. Performance Obligations Contingent consideration is subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, with any change in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The Company’s contracts with homebuyers contain a single performance obligation. The performance obligation is satisfied when homes are completed and legal title has been transferred to the buyer. The Company does not have any variable consideration associated with home sales transactions. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Equity of Consolidated Subsidiary Redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary represents equity related to a put option held by a minority shareholder of a subsidiary. Based on the put option structure, the minority shareholder’s interest in the controlled subsidiary is classified as a redeemable noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets. The accretion of the redeemable noncontrolling interest to its estimated redemption value is recorded in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets if the estimated redemption value, net of accretion, is greater than the current value of the noncontrolling interest capital account. Revenue Recognition Contracts with Customers The Company derives revenues from two primary sources: the closing and delivery of homes through our builder operations segments and the closing of lots sold to homebuilders through our land development segment. All of our revenue is from contracts with customers. Contract Liabilities The Company requires homebuyers to submit a deposit for home purchases 70 Revenue from mechanic’s lien contracts in which the Company serves as the general contractor for custom homes where the customer, and not the Company, owns the underlying land and improvements is recognized based on the input method, where progress toward completion is measured by relating the actual cost of work performed to date to the estimated total cost of the respective contracts. Lot option contracts contain multiple performance obligations. The performance obligations are satisfied as lots are closed and legal title has been transferred to the builder. For lot option contracts, individual performance obligations are accounted for separately. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. Certain lot option contracts require escalations in lot price over the option period. Any escalator is not collectible until the lot closing occurs. While we recognize lot escalators as variable consideration within the transaction price, we do not recognize escalator revenue until a builder closes on a lot subject to an escalator as the escalator relates to general inflation and holding costs. Occasionally, the Company sells developed and undeveloped land parcels. If the land parcel is developed prior to the sale of the land, the revenue is recognized at closing since we deliver a single performance obligation in the form of a developed parcel. We also recognize revenue at closing on undeveloped land parcel sales as there are no other obligations beyond delivering the undeveloped land. Homebuyers are not obligated to pay for a home until the closing and delivery of the home. The selling price of a home is based on the contract price adjusted for any change orders, which are considered modifications of the contract price. Homebuilders are not obligated to pay for developed lots prior to control of the lots and any associated improvements being transferred to them. The term of our lot option contracts is generally based upon the number of lots being purchased and an agreed upon lot takedown schedule, which can be in excess of one year. Lots cannot be taken down until development is substantially complete. There is no significant financing component related to our third-party lot sales. The Company does not sell warranties outside of the customary workmanship warranties provided on homes or developed lots at the time of sale. The warranties offered to homebuyers are short term, with the exception of ten- year warranties on structural concerns for homes. As these are assurance- type warranties, there is no separate performance obligation related to warranties provided to homebuyers or homebuilder. Significant Judgments and Estimates completion and customer satisfaction. The builder incentives do not represent incremental costs that would require capitalization as we would incur these costs whether or not we sold the home. As such, we recognize builder incentives as expense at the time they are paid. Advertising costs, sales salaries and certain costs associated with model homes, such as signage, do not qualify for capitalization under ASC 340- 40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs - Contracts with Customers, as they are not incremental costs of obtaining a contract. As such, we expense these costs to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred. Costs incurred related to model home furnishings and sales office construction are capitalized and included in property and equipment, net on the consolidated balance sheets. Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expense represents salaries, benefits, share-based compensation, property taxes on finished homes, depreciation, amortization, advertising and marketing, rent, and other administrative items, and is recorded in the period incurred. There are no significant judgments involved in the recognition of residential units revenue. The performance obligation of delivering a completed home is satisfied upon the sale closing when title transfers to the buyer. Advertising Expense There are no significant judgments involved in the recognition of land and lots revenue. The performance obligation of delivering land and lots is satisfied upon the closing of the sale when title transfers to the homebuilder. The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 totaled $2.1 million, $1.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Contract Costs The Company recognizes an asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if it expects to recover those costs. Interest Expense The Company pays sales commissions to employees and/or outside realtors related to individual home sales which are expensed as incurred at the time of closing. Commissions on the sale of land parcels are also expensed as incurred upon closing. Sales commissions on the sale of homes are included in the cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of income. The Company also pays builder incentives to employees which are based on the time it takes to build individual homes, as well as quality inspection Interest expense consists primarily of interest costs incurred on our debt that are not capitalized, and amortization of debt issuance costs. We capitalize interest costs incurred to inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Debt issuance costs are capitalized to inventory over the term of the underlying debt using the straight-line method, in accordance with our interest capitalization policy. All interest costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. 71 Net Income Attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per Share Income Taxes The Company’s restricted stock awards have the right to receive forfeitable dividends on an equal basis with common stock and therefore are not considered participating securities that must be included in the calculation of net income per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock awards during each period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect of all dilutive securities, including stock options and restricted stock awards. Cost Recognition Lot acquisition, materials, direct costs, interest and indirect costs related to the acquisition, development, and construction of lots and homes are capitalized. Direct and indirect costs of developing residential lots are allocated evenly to all applicable lots. Capitalized costs of residential lots are charged to earnings when the related revenue is recognized. Non-capitalizable costs in connection with developed lots and completed homes and other selling and administrative costs are charged to earnings when incurred. Share-Based Compensation The Company measures and accounts for share-based awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. The Company expenses share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options and restricted stock awards. Share-based compensation expense associated with stock options and restricted stock awards with vesting contingent upon the achievement of service conditions is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period over which the awards are expected to vest. The Company estimates the value of stock options with vesting contingent upon the achievement of service conditions as of the date the award was granted using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the use of certain input variables, such as expected volatility, risk- free interest rate and expected award life. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company regularly reviews historical and anticipated future pre-tax results of operations to determine whether we will be able to realize the benefit of deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax asset when it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. The Company assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In making this assessment, management considers all available positive and negative evidence and available income tax planning to determine whether it is more- likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods. This assessment requires significant judgment and estimates involving current and deferred income taxes, tax attributes relating to the interpretation of various tax laws, historical bases of tax attributes associated with certain assets and limitations surrounding the realization of deferred tax assets. We establish accruals for uncertain tax positions that reflect our best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more- likely-than-not basis. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Accrued interest and penalties, if any, are included within accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions have a more-likely-than-not chance of being sustained by the Company. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. 72 Fair Value Measurements The Company has adopted and implemented the provisions of ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements, with respect to fair value measurements of: all elected financial assets and liabilities and any nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). Under ASC 820-10, fair value is defined as an exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. These provisions establish a three- tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of input are defined as follows: Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company; Level 2 — inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those classified as Level 1; and Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation. Entities are encouraged to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation. Our valuation methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred on the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. Segment Information In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), an operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), or decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. A reportable segment is an operating segment, either separately defined or aggregated from several operating segments based on similar economic and other characteristics, that exceeds certain quantitative thresholds of ASC 280. Effective November 15, 2019, the Company identifies its CODM as three key executives - the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the President of Texas Region. In determining the reportable segments, the CODM considers similar economic and other characteristics, including geography, class of customers, product types, and production processes. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases (“Topic 842”), by issuing ASU 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the statement of income. The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. 73 In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017- 04”), which removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. A goodwill impairment will now be determined by the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU 2019-12 also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. ASU 2019-12 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2019-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Providence Group, Pratt Stacks Atlanta, GA The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We did not elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements, the latter not being applicable to us. The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We believe the most significant effects relate to (1) the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet for our office operating leases and (2) providing new disclosures about our leasing activities. There was no change in our leasing activities as a result of adoption. Upon adoption, we recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $4.2 million, with corresponding ROU assets of the same amount based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments from an “incurred loss” approach to an “expected credit loss” methodology. Following the issuance of ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates in November 2019, ASU 2016-13 is expected to be effective for the Company for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022, with early adoption permitted, and requires full retrospective application on adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements but does not expect such impact to be material. 74 Normandy Homes, Viridian Arlington, Texas 75 2. BUSINESS COMBINATION Acquisition of GRBK GHO Homes, LLC the date of the acquisition to reflect the purchase price. The following is a summary of fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands): On April 26, 2018 (the “Acquisition Date”), following a series of transactions, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of GHO Homes Corporation and its affiliates (“GHO”) through a newly formed subsidiary, GRBK GHO Homes, LLC (“GRBK GHO”), in which the Company holds an 80% controlling interest. The owner of GHO contributed $8.3 million of net assets to GRBK GHO in an exchange for a 20% interest in GRBK GHO. The minority partner of GRBK GHO serves as the president of GRBK GHO. GRBK GHO operates primarily in the Vero Beach, Florida market and is engaged in land and lot development, as well as all aspects of the homebuilding process. The acquisition allowed the Company to expand its operations into a new geographic market. The Company consolidates the financial statements of GRBK GHO as the Company owns 80% of the outstanding voting shares of the builder. The noncontrolling interest attributable to the 20% minority interest owned by our Florida-based partner is included as redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The original consideration of $42.2 million consisted of $33.2 million in cash paid by the Company to the owner of GHO, $8.3 million of assets contributed by the owner of GHO, and an estimated $0.6 million of contingent consideration. Following completion of the audit of the balance sheet of GHO as of the Acquisition Date, the purchase price was adjusted by $2.0 million that was contributed by the Company in cash, and the value of contributed assets from the minority partner was increased by $0.5 million. Contingent consideration was adjusted to $0.5 million based on finalization of valuation procedures. Thus, the final total consideration was $44.6 million. Total consideration for the Company’s 80% interest in GRBK GHO was $35.8 million. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company may be obligated to pay contingent consideration to our partner if certain annual performance targets are met over the three-year period following the Acquisition Date. The contingent consideration amounts are not contractually limited. In accordance with ASC 805, all material assets and liabilities, including contingent consideration, were measured and recognized at fair value as of 76 Assets acquired Cash Inventory Property and equipment Intangible assets - trade name Intangible assets - home construction contracts Goodwill(1) Other assets Total Assets Liabilities assumed Notes payable Accrued expenses and other liabilities Customer deposits Total liabilities Redeemable noncontrolling interest Net assets acquired(2) 8,399 45,005 1,462 850 290 680 898 57,584 300 5,486 9,073 14,859 6,951 35,774 (1) Goodwill is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes. (2) Contingent consideration of $0.5 million is included in the fair value of net assets acquired. The final purchase price allocation reflected above is based upon estimates and assumptions. The Company engaged a valuation firm to assist in the allocation of the purchase price, and valuation procedures related to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been completed. The estimated cash flows and ultimate valuation have been significantly affected by estimated discount rates, estimates related to expected average selling prices and sales incentives, expected sales pace and cancellation rates, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs and may vary significantly between communities. The valuation of redeemable noncontrolling interest is based on a market approach, considering the equity contribution made by the 20% partner, adjusted for control and marketability factors. Acquired inventory consisted of both land under development and work in process inventory, as well as completed homes held for sale. The estimated fair value of real estate inventory was determined on a community-by- community basis, primarily using the income approach which derives a value using a discounted cash flow for income-producing real property. The values of work in process and completed home inventory were estimated based upon the stage of production of each unit and a gross margin that we believe a market participant would require to complete the remaining construction and sales and marketing efforts through the sale of the homes. The stage of production, as of the acquisition date, ranged from recently started lots to fully completed homes. A sales comparison approach was used for land for which significant lot development had not yet begun as of the Acquisition Date. An income approach was also utilized to value mechanic’s lien home construction contracts acquired. The estimated fair values of the acquired trade name, GHO Homes, and the home construction contracts, were determined using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach, which involved assumptions related to revenue growth, market awareness and useful life. The supplemental pro forma information for revenue and earnings of the Company as though the business combination had occurred as of January 1, 2017 is impractical to provide due to the fact that consolidated reporting for the specific group of entities acquired had not existed prior to the acquisition. 31, 2019, all the home construction contracts have been completed, and the carrying value of the related intangible asset and accumulated amortization were written off with no impact to net income. As of December 31, 2019, all the home construction contracts have been completed, and the carrying value of the related intangible asset and accumulated amortization were written off with no impact to net income. The amortization of the acquired trade name of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. The accumulated amortization of the acquired trade name was $0.1 million as of December 31, 2019. The estimated amortization expense related to the acquired trade name for each of the next five years as of December 31, 2019 is as follows (in thousands): 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total $85 85 85 85 85 $425 During the year ended December 31, 2018, we had incurred transaction costs of $0.5 million related to the business combination, which have been expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expense. Goodwill Intangible Assets The amortization of the acquired intangible assets of $0.2 million for the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018 was recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. The accumulated amortization of the acquired intangible assets was $0.2 million as of December 31, 2018. The estimated fair value of the acquired home construction contracts intangible asset was amortized to cost of residential units as income on the related contracts was earned, over a period of eleven months. As of December The allocation to goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price, including contingent consideration, over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill results primarily from operational synergies expected from the business combination. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2019 by completing a qualitative assessment in accordance with ASC 350. The Company determined that it was not more likely than not that the reporting unit’s estimated fair value was more than its carrying value and, therefore, the two-step goodwill impairment test was unnecessary. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. 77 The following table shows the changes in redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary during the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands): Redeemable noncontrolling interest, beginning of period Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest partner Distributions of income to redeemable noncontrolling interest partner Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest Redeemable noncontrolling interest, end of period Year Ended December 31, 2019 $8,531 3,462 (527) 2,145 $13,611 Contingent Consideration The performance targets specified in the purchase agreement were met for the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and contingent consideration of $1.8 million was earned by the minority partner and paid by the Company in April 2019 in addition to a $0.5 million distribution of income. The performance targets specified in the purchase agreement were met for the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and the contingent consideration of $5.3 million was earned by the minority partner. As of December 31, 2019, the estimate of the undiscounted contingent consideration payouts for the period from January 1, 2020 through April 26, 2021 was $0. The change in the range of estimates of the undiscounted contingent consideration compared to the range of estimates disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 was due to revision of the Company’s forecasts of GRBK GHO profits and capital requirements, as well as reduced volatility of earnings. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Equity of Consolidated Subsidiary As part of the GRBK GHO business combination, we entered into a put/call agreement (“Put/Call Agreement”) with respect to the equity interest in the joint venture held by the minority partner. The Put/Call Agreement provided that the 20% ownership interest in GRBK GHO held by the minority partner would be subject to put and purchase options starting in April 2021. Refer to Note 18 for additional information on subsequent events. The exercise price would be based on the financial results of GRBK GHO for the three years prior to exercise of the option. If the minority partner does not exercise the put option, we have the option, but not the obligation, to buy the 20% interest in GRBK GHO from our partner. Based on the nature of the put/call structure, the noncontrolling interest attributable to the 20% minority interest owned by our Florida-based partner is included as redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 78 CB JENI Homes, The Village at Twin Creeks Allen, TX 3. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES Effective November 30, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, SGHDAL LLC (“Southgate”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Southgate Homes DFW LLC. As a result, Southgate became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was no longer considered a VIE and was consolidated based on the majority voting interest pursuant to ASC 810. Effective December 31, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, CLH20, LLC (“Centre Living”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Centre Living Homes, LLC, and we contributed certain real estate inventory assets to Centre Living. As both Centre Living, to which ownership interests were assigned and assets and liabilities were transferred, and Centre Living Homes, LLC were controlled by the Company on December 31, 2019, the acquisition of the remaining membership interest and the contribution of the real estate inventory assets were accounted for at carrying amounts on Centre Living Homes, LLC’s books on the date of the transfer, pursuant to provisions of ASC 805 that govern transactions between entities under common control. Subsequently, the prior owner of a portion of the membership and voting interests in Centre Living Homes, LLC acquired a ten percent membership and voting interest in Centre Living for $3.6 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2019, Centre Living was an indirect subsidiary in which the Company owned a ninety percent membership interest and a ninety percent voting interest, was no longer considered a VIE and was consolidated based on the majority voting interest pursuant to ASC 810. Consolidated VIEs CB JENI Homes DFW LLC (“CB JENI”) and The Providence Group of Georgia LLC (“TPG”), the controlled builders based in Dallas and Atlanta, respectively, in which the Company owns a 50% equity interest and a 51% voting interest, are deemed to be VIEs for which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. We sell finished lots and option lots from third-party developers to these controlled builders for their homebuilding operations and provide them with construction financing and strategic planning. The board of managers of each of these controlled builders has the power to direct the activities that significantly impact the controlled builder’s economic performance. Pursuant to the Company’s agreements with these controlled builders, it has the ability to appoint two of the three members to the controlled builder’s board of managers. A majority of the board of managers constitutes a quorum to transact business. No action can be approved by the board of managers without the approval from at least one individual whom the Company has appointed at the controlled builder. The Company has the ability to control the activities of each controlled builder that most significantly impact the controlled builder’s economic performance. Such activities include, but are not limited to, involvement in the day to day capital and operating decisions, the ability to determine the budget and plan, the ability to control financing decisions, and the ability to acquire additional land or dispose of land. In addition, the Company has the right to receive the expected residual returns and obligation to absorb the expected losses of each controlled builder through the pro rata profits and losses we are allocated based on our ownership interest. Therefore, the financial statements of the Dallas and Atlanta-based controlled builders are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements following the variable interest model. The aggregated carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of CB JENI and TPG consolidated following the variable interest model were $279.8 million and $265.3 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019 and $262.9 million and $234.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018. The noncontrolling interests attributable to the 50% minority interests owned by the Dallas and Atlanta-based controlled builders were included as noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The creditors of the above controlled builders have no recourse against the Company. Unconsolidated VIEs Land and lot option purchase contracts The Company evaluates all option contracts to purchase land and lots to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of counterparts of these option contracts. Although the Company does not have legal title to the optioned land or lots, if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of or makes a significant deposit for optioned land or lots, it may need to consolidate the land or lots under option at the purchase price of the optioned land or lots. 79 As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s exposure to loss related to its option contracts with third parties primarily consisted of its non- refundable option deposits. Following VIE evaluation, it was concluded that the Company was not the primary beneficiary in any of the VIEs related to land or lot option contracts as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. EJB River Holdings, LLC In December 2018, EJB River Holdings, LLC joint venture (“EJB River Holdings”) was formed by TPG with the purpose to acquire and develop a tract of land in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In May 2019, East Jones Bridge, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“EJB”) was admitted as a member of EJB River Holdings, which resulted in TPG and EJB each having a 50% ownership interest in EJB River Holdings. EJB River Holdings had no activity in the period from its formation until October 2019. In October 2019, EJB River Holdings received two $5.0 million initial contributions from its two members, TPG and EJB. In December 2019, two additional contributions of $0.3 million were made by TPG and EJB to EJB River Holdings. Per EJB River Holdings’ operating agreement, TPG and EJB share equally in the profits and losses of EJB River Holdings, with the exception of certain customary fees. In October 2019, EJB River Holdings issued two loans with the total maximum amount of borrowings of $21.9 million to finance its land acquisition and development in Gwinnett County, Georgia. One of the investors in EJB issued a personal guarantee on one of the loans in the amount of $9.4 million. Subsequently, in October 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company provided a limited $2.0 million guarantee to the investor in EJB. The approximate term of the guarantee is 35 months. In the event EJB River Holdings defaults on its $9.4 million loan and the investor in EJB makes the $9.4 million payment under his personal guarantee, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under its limited guarantee is $2.0 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has no current liability related to the guarantee obligation as the payment risk of the guarantee has been assessed to be very low. Following the analysis of the above facts and provisions of EJB River Holdings’ operating agreement, the Company has determined that EJB River Holdings is a VIE in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the investment in EJB River Holdings was treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and was included in investments in 80 unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of EJB River Holdings were $23.7 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Assets were comprised of real estate inventory and cash, whereas the liabilities were comprised of loans and interest payable. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with EJB River Holdings was $7.3 million, represented by the sum of the Company’ investment in EJB River Holdings of $5.3 million and the $2.0 million limited guarantee described above. 4. INVENTORY A summary of inventory is as follows (in thousands): Homes completed or under construction Land and lots - developed and under development Land held for sale Total inventory December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 $314,966 $268,763 437,553 1,048 399,809 389 $753,567 $668,961 A summary of interest costs incurred, capitalized and expensed is as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Interest capitalized at beginning of period $14,780 $10,474 $9,417 Interest incurred 12,140 9,003 4,456 Interest charged to cost of revenues (8,324) (4,697) (3,399) Interest capitalized at end of period $18,596 $14,780 $10,474 As of December 31, 2019, the Company reviewed the performance and outlook for all of its communities for indicators of potential impairment and performed detailed impairment analysis when necessary. As of December 31, 2019, the Company performed further impairment analysis of the selling communities with indicators of impairment with a combined corresponding carrying value of approximately $11.2 million. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded impairment adjustments of $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $0.1 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of impaired communities to fair value. The recorded impairment adjustments related to real estate inventory in our builder operations segments and were included in cost of residential units in our consolidated statements of income. 5. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES Challenger On August 15, 2017, the Company, JBGL and GB Challenger, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Challenger”) entered into a Membership Interest Purchase and Contribution Agreement (the “Challenger Agreement”) with The Challenger Group, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (“TCGI”), and certain of its affiliates (the “Challenger Entities”) and Brian R. Bahr (“Bahr”), resulting in the Company, through its interest in JBGL, and the Challenger Entities owning a 49.9% and 50.1% ownership interest, respectively, in Challenger, and Challenger owning all of the membership and ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Challenger Entities named in the Challenger Agreement. As consideration for such interests, the Company agreed to issue to the Challenger Entities, or their designees, 1,497,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, in a private placement, with 20,000 shares of its common stock held back pending satisfactory resolution of indemnification claims (“Holdback Shares”). On March 16, 2018, the Company issued the Holdback Shares; therefore, $0.2 million was recorded in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. The Challenger Entities, at their discretion, may offer to sell and transfer an additional 20.1% or, in certain circumstances, all of the Challenger Entities’ interest in Challenger (“Additional Membership Interests”) to the Company on or after the third anniversary of the Challenger Agreement. The Company is not required to purchase the Additional Membership Interests. The Company incurred $0.3 million in related acquisition costs during the year ended December 31, 2017 which are included in the cost basis of investment in the unconsolidated entity. gain a presence in the Colorado Springs market. The issuance of the common stock by the Company related to the investment in Challenger was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the safe harbor provided by Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The Company relied, in part, upon representations from each of the individuals that they are “accredited investors” as such term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D. The Company’s investment in Challenger at August 15, 2017 of $15.1 million was more than its share of the estimated underlying net assets of Challenger, resulting in a preliminary difference in basis of $5.1 million, which was attributed to inventory and intangible assets. The Company’s investment in Challenger on August 15, 2017 was determined as follows (in thousands, except per share data): Consideration transferred at closing Green Brick common stock issued Price per share of Green Brick common stock (1) Fair value of common stock consideration Acquisition related costs Total fair value of consideration Subsequent consideration Holdback Shares Price per share of Green Brick common stock (1) Total fair value of subsequent consideration Total fair value of consideration 1,477 $9.90 $14,622 $241 $14,863 20 $9.90 198 $15,061 (1) Based upon closing price of the Company’s common stock upon the parties’ execution of the Challenger Agreement. The Challenger Entities operate homebuilding operations under the name Challenger Homes. Challenger constructs townhouses, single family homes and luxury patio homes, and is located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The Company partnered with Challenger in order to expand its business with partners that are complementary to its current builder partner group and to The Company holds two of the five board of managers (the “Managers”) seats of Challenger. Challenger’s six officers, employees of the Challenger Entities, were designated by the Managers for the purpose of managing the day to day operations. The Company does not have a controlling financial 81 interest in Challenger as the Company has less than 50% of the voting interests in Challenger. The Company’s investment in Challenger is treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and is included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s investment in Challenger is carried at cost, as adjusted for the Company’s share of income or losses and distributions received, as well as for adjustments related to basis differences between the Company’s cost and the Company’s underlying equity in net assets recorded in Challenger’s financial statements as of the date of acquisition. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the investment in Challenger was $23.8 million, whereas the underlying 49.9% equity in net assets of Challenger was $19.6 million. The $4.2 million difference represents the premium paid for the Company’s equity interest in excess of Challenger’s carrying value. This basis difference primarily relates to the estimated fair value of inventory, as well as the Challenger Homes trade name and capitalized acquisition costs. The amortization of the basis differences related to inventory is recorded as a reduction of equity in income of unconsolidated entities as homes are closed on and delivered to homebuyers. The basis difference related to the trade name is amortized over ten years as a reduction of equity in income of unconsolidated entities. The Company recognized $8.3 million, $7.0 million, and $2.7 million related to Challenger in equity in income of unconsolidated entities during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Providence Title In March 2018, the Company formed a joint venture with a title company in Georgia to provide title closing and settlement services to our Atlanta-based builder. The Company, through its controlled builder, The Providence Group of Georgia, L.L.C. (“TPG”), owns a 49% equity interest in Providence Group Title, LLC (“Providence Title”). The Company determined that the investment in Providence Title should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Green Brick Mortgage In June 2018, the Company formed a joint venture with PrimeLending to provide mortgage loan origination services to our builders. The Company owns a 49% equity interest in Green Brick Mortgage, LLC (“Green Brick Mortgage”) which initiated mortgage loan origination activities in September 2018. The Company determined that the investment in Green Brick Mortgage should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. CB JENI Homes, Vista Del Lago 82 Lewisville, TX EJB River Holdings In December 2018, EJB River Holdings joint venture was formed by TPG with the purpose to acquire and develop a tract of land in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In May 2019, EJB was admitted as a member of EJB River Holdings, which resulted in TPG and EJB each having a 50% ownership interest in EJB River Holdings. EJB River Holdings had no activity in the period from its formation until October 2019. Please refer to Note 3 for more information. Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Revenues $166,368 $166,102 $58,958 Costs and expenses 144,097 148,222 44,969 Net earnings of unconsolidated entities $22,271 $17,880 $13,989 Company’s share in net earnings of unconsolidated entities $9,809 $7,259 $2,746 The Company determined that the investment in EJB River Holdings should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company did not identify indicators of impairment for its investments in unconsolidated entities. A summary of the financial information of the unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method is as follows (in thousands): 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Assets: Cash Accounts receivable Bonds and notes receivable Loans held for sale, at fair value Inventory Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued expenses and other liabilities Notes payable Total liabilities Owners’ equity: Green Brick Others Total owners’ equity Total liabilities and owners’ equity December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 The following is a summary of property and equipment by major classification and related accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): $11,699 $14,584 3,252 5,864 23,143 73,704 4,012 1,259 5,864 3,083 44,375 3,132 $121,674 $72,297 $1,726 7,784 58,223 $2,173 5,328 31,402 $67,733 $38,903 $25,910 28,031 $53,941 $121,674 $15,653 17,741 $33,394 $72,297 Land Building Model home furnishings and capitalized sales office costs Office furniture and equipment Leasehold improvements Computers and equipment Vehicles and field trailers December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 $763 180 6,090 424 1,824 912 357 10,550 $763 82 5,218 427 1,692 901 279 9,362 Less: accumulated deprecation (6,241) (4,672) Total property and equipment, net $4,309 $4,690 Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 totaled $2.9 million, $2.7 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of income. 83 7. DEBT and the maturity date of the Secured Revolving Credit Facility was May 1, 2022. The aggregated annual principal payments under the borrowings on lines of credit and senior unsecured notes over the next five years as of December 31, 2019 are (in thousands): As of December 31, 2019, letters of credit outstanding totaling $8.9 million reduced the aggregate maximum commitment amount to $66.1 million. 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total $— 17,860 148,140 — 12,500 62,500 $241,000 Lines of Credit Borrowings on lines of credit outstanding, net of debt issuance costs, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of the following (in thousands): Secured revolving credit facility Unsecured revolving credit facility Debt issuance costs, net of amortization Total borrowings on lines of credit, net Secured Revolving Credit Facility December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 38,000 46,500 128,000 155,500 (1,358) (1,614) 164,642 200,386 On July 30, 2015, the Company entered into a secured revolving credit facility (the “Secured Revolving Credit Facility”) with Inwood National Bank, which initially provided for up to $50.0 million. Amounts outstanding under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility are secured by mortgages on real property and security interests in certain personal property (to the extent that such personal property is connected with the use and enjoyment of the real property) that is owned by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. The entire unpaid principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable on the maturity date. Following several amendments, as of December 31, 2019, the aggregate commitment amount was $75.0 million 84 As of December 31, 2019, outstanding borrowings under the amended Secured Revolving Credit Facility bear interest payable monthly at a floating rate per annum equal to the rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., from time to time, as its “Prime Rate” (the “Index”) with such adjustments to the interest rate being made on the effective date of any change in the Index, less 0.25%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the interest may not, at any time, be less than 4% per annum or more than the lesser amount of 18% and the highest maximum rate allowed by applicable law. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility was 4.50% per annum. As of December 31, 2019, the amended Secured Revolving Credit Facility was subject to a borrowing base limitation equal to the sum of 50% of the total value of land and 65% of the total value of lots owned by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, each as determined by an independent appraiser, with the value of land being restricted from being more than 65% of the borrowing base. As of December 31, 2019, the amended Secured Revolving Credit Facility was also subject to a non-usage fee equal to 0.25% of the average unfunded amount of the commitment amount over a trailing 12 month period. Under the terms of the amended Secured Revolving Credit Facility, the Company is required, among other things, to maintain minimum multiples of tangible net worth in excess of the outstanding Secured Revolving Credit Facility balance, minimum interest coverage and maximum leverage. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019. Fees and other debt issuance costs of $0.0 million, $0.0 million and $0.2 million were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, associated with the Secured Revolving Credit Facility amendments. These costs are deferred and reduce the carrying amount of debt in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company capitalizes these costs to inventory over the term of the Secured Revolving Credit Facility using the straight-line method. Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility On December 15, 2015, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Citibank, N.A. and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (“Credit Suisse”) as lenders, and Citibank, N.A. as administrative agent, providing for a senior, unsecured revolving credit facility with initial aggregate lending commitments of up to $40.0 million (the “Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility”). The Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility provides for interest rate options on advances at rates equal to either: (a) in the case of base rate advances, the highest of (1) Citibank’s base rate, (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (3) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%, in each case plus 1.5%; or (b) in the case of Eurodollar rate advances, the reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 2.5%. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility is payable in arrears on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility ranged from 4.25% to 4.30% per annum. The Company pays the lenders a commitment fee on the amount of the unused commitments on a quarterly basis at a rate per annum equal to 0.45%. Outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility are subject to, among other things, a borrowing base. The borrowing base limitation is equal to the sum of: 100% of unrestricted cash in excess of $15.0 million; 85% of the book value of model homes, construction in progress homes, completed sold and speculative homes (subject to certain limitations on the age and number of speculative homes and model homes); 65% of the book value of finished lots and land under development; and 50% of the book value of entitled land (subject to certain limitations on the value of entitled land and land under development as a percentage of the borrowing base). Following amendments to the Credit Agreement and the addition of Flagstar Bank, FSB (“Flagstar Bank”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) and Chemical Financial Corporation (“Chemical”) as lenders, the aggregate lending commitment available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019 was $215.0 million, the maximum aggregate amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility was $275.0 million, and the termination date with respect to commitments under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility was December 14, 2021 for $30.0 million and December 14, 2022 for $185.0 million out of the aggregate lending commitment of $215.0 million. Fees and other debt issuance costs of $0.3 million, $0.9 million and $0.7 million were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, associated with the amendments, term extensions and increases in lenders’ commitments. These costs are deferred and reduce the carrying amount of debt in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company capitalizes these costs to inventory over the term of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility using the straight-line method. Under the terms of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain compliance with various financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio, and a minimum consolidated tangible net worth. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019. Senior Unsecured Notes On August 8, 2019, the Company issued $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due on August 8, 2026 at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum to Prudential Private Capital in a Section 4(a)(2) private placement transaction and received net proceeds of $73.3 million. A brokerage fee of approximately $1.5 million associated with the issuance was paid at closing. The brokerage fee, and other debt issuance costs of approximately $0.2 million, were deferred and reduced the amount of debt on our consolidated balance sheet. The Company used the net proceeds from the issuance of the senior unsecured notes to repay borrowings under the Company’s existing revolving credit facilities. Principal on the senior unsecured notes is required to be paid in increments of $12.5 million on August 8, 2024 and $12.5 million on August 8, 2025. The final principal payment of $50.0 million is due on August 8, 2026. Optional prepayment is allowed with payment of a “make-whole” premium which fluctuates depending on market interest rates. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears commencing November 8, 2019. Under the terms of the senior unsecured notes, the Company is required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various financial covenants, including maximum leverage ratios, a minimum interest coverage ratio, and a minimum consolidated tangible net worth. The senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by the Company’s significant subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries. The senior unsecured notes will rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. 85 8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Common Stock Pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”), the Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2019, there were 50,879,949 shares of common stock issued and 50,488,010 outstanding. On March 16, 2018, 20,000 shares of common stock were issued as additional consideration for the investment in Challenger upon resolution of terms for such holdback shares. Preferred Stock Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Board of Directors (the “BOD”) has the authority, subject to any limitations imposed by law or Nasdaq rules, without further action by the stockholders, to issue such preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the voting powers (if any), the preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights or privileges, if any, of such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. These rights, preferences and privileges may include, but are not limited to, dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of that series. As of December 31, 2019, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Share Repurchase Programs In March 2016, the Company’s BOD authorized a share repurchase program of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through 2017. The share repurchase program expired in 2017. No shares were repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2017. to exceed $30.0 million. The timing, volume and nature of share repurchases are at the discretion of management and dependent on market conditions, corporate and regulatory requirements, available cash and other factors, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Authorized repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, through block trades or in privately negotiated transactions. No assurance can be given that any particular amount of common stock will be repurchased. All or part of the repurchases may be implemented under a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 or Rule 10b-18 established by the SEC, which would allow repurchases under pre-set terms at times when the Company might otherwise be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed blackout periods. This repurchase program may be modified, extended or terminated by the BOD at any time. The Company intends to finance any repurchases with available cash and proceeds from borrowings under lines of credit. In December 2018, the Company repurchased 136,756 shares for approximately $1.0 million. On December 31, 2018, the Company’s BOD authorized implementation of share repurchases in accordance with a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 (the “December 2018 Trading Plan”) within the 2018 Share Repurchase Program. The trading plan was effective from January 2, 2019 until March 30, 2019. In January 2019, the Company repurchased 7,862 shares for approximately $0.1 million under the December 2018 Trading Plan. In June 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized discrete repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program of 39,320 shares for approximately $0.3 million. On June 27, 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized implementation of share repurchases in accordance with a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 (the “June 2019 Trading Plan”) within the 2018 Share Repurchase Program. The trading plan was effective from July 1, 2019 until August 5, 2019. In July 2019, the Company repurchased 144,584 shares for approximately $1.2 million under the June 2019 Trading Plan. In September 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized discrete repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program of 63,417 shares for approximately $0.6 million. In October 2018, the Company’s BOD authorized a share repurchase program for the period beginning on October 3, 2018 and ending on October 3, 2020 of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate price not As of December 31, 2019, the remaining dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program was $26.8 million. 86 that can only be settled in cash will not be treated as shares of common stock granted for purposes of the 2014 Equity Plan. The maximum amount that can be paid to any single participant in any one calendar year pursuant to a cash bonus award under the 2014 Equity Plan is $2.0 million. As of December 31, 2019, 1,656,703 shares remain available for future grant of awards under the 2014 Equity Plan. The Providence Group, Pratt Stacks Atlanta, GA 9. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan On October 17, 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved the Green Brick Partners, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Equity Plan”). The purpose of the 2014 Equity Plan is to provide a means for the Company to attract and retain key personnel and to provide a means whereby current and prospective directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors can acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to the value of the Company’s common stock, thereby strengthening their commitment to the welfare of the Company and aligning their interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The 2014 Equity Plan will terminate automatically on the tenth anniversary of the date it became effective. No awards will be granted under the 2014 Equity Plan after that date, but awards granted prior to that date may extend beyond that date. Under the 2014 Equity Plan, awards of stock options, including both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, other share-based awards and performance compensation awards, may be granted. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that is authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2014 Equity Plan is 2,350,956 shares, subject to adjustment for certain corporate events or changes in the Company’s capital structure. In general, the Company’s employees or those reasonably expected to become the Company’s employees, consultants and directors, are eligible for awards under the 2014 Equity Plan, provided that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. The Company has six non-employee directors and approximately 460 employees (including employees of our builders) who are eligible to receive awards under the 2014 Equity Plan. Written agreements between the Company and each participant evidence the terms of each award granted under the 2014 Equity Plan. If any award under the 2014 Equity Plan expires or otherwise terminates, in whole or in part, without having been exercised in full, the common stock withheld from issuance under that award will become available for future issuance under the plan. If shares issued under the 2014 Equity Plan are reacquired by the Company pursuant to the terms of any forfeiture provision, those shares will become available for future awards under the plan. Awards 87 Share-Based Award Activity Stock Options During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company granted restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) under the 2014 Equity Plan to Executive Officers (“EOs”) and non-employee members of the BOD. The RSAs granted to EOs were 100% vested and non-forfeitable on the grant date. Some members of the BOD elected to defer up to 100% of their annual retainer fee in the form of common stock. The RSAs granted to the BOD will become fully vested on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the date of grant of the shares of restricted common stock or (ii) the date of the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The fair value of the RSAs granted to EOs and non- employee members of the BOD were recorded as share-based compensation expense on the grant date and over the vesting period, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company withheld 59,116 shares of common stock from EOs, at a total cost of $0.5 million, to satisfy statutory minimum tax requirements upon grant of the RSAs. A summary of share-based awards activity during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Stock options granted to date were not granted under the 2014 Equity Plan. The stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 vested and became exercisable in five substantially equal installments on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date and expire 10 years after the date on which they were granted. Compensation expense related to these options was expensed on a straight-line basis over the 5 years year service period. All of the stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 are vested. We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the grant date fair value of the stock options. There were no stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. A summary of stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2019 is as follows: Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share Weighted Aver- age Remaining Contractual Term (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share 38 229 (229) — 38 140 (144) — 34 219 (194) — 59 $7.51 $10.11 $9.66 — $10.25 $10.45 $10.03 — $12.00 $9.14 $9.67 — $9.05 Options outstanding, December 31, 2018 500 $7.49 Granted Exercised Forfeited Options outstanding, December 31, 2019 Options exercisable, December 31, 2019 — — — 500 500 — — — $7.49 $7.49 4.82 4.82 $1,995 $1,995 A summary of unvested stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2019 is as follows: Unvested, December 31, 2018 Granted Vested Forfeited Unvested, December 31, 2019 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share 100 — (100) — — $2.88 — $2.88 — $2.88 Nonvested, December 31, 2016 Granted Vested Forfeited Nonvested, December 31, 2017 Granted Vested Forfeited Nonvested, December 31, 2018 Granted Vested Forfeited Nonvested, December 31, 2019 88 Share-Based Compensation Expense Share-based compensation expense was $2.2 million, $1.8 million and $2.6 million for the years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Recognized tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense was $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the estimated total remaining unamortized share-based compensation expense related to unvested RSAs, net of forfeitures, was $0.2 million which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.4 years. The total fair value of RSAs vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1.9 million, $1.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, there was no remaining unamortized share-based compensation expense related to stock options. 10. REVENUE RECOGNITION Disaggregation of Revenue The following reflects the disaggregation of revenue by primary geographic market, type of customer, product type, and timing of revenue recognition (in thousands): 2019 2018 2017 Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue Years Ended December 31, Primary Geographical Market Central Southeast Total revenues Type of Customer Homebuyers Homebuilders Total revenues Product Type Residential units Land and lots Total revenues Timing of Revenue Recognition Transferred at a point in time Transferred over time Total revenues $396,900 362,930 $759,830 $759,830 — $759,830 $759,830 — $759,830 $752,273 7,557 $759,830 $31,080 750 $31,830 $185 31,645 $31,830 $— 31,830 $31,830 $31,830 — $31,830 $281,868 297,025 $578,893 $578,893 — $578,893 $578,893 — $578,893 $571,177 7,716 $578,893 $40,184 4,570 $44,754 $670 44,084 $44,754 $— 44,754 $44,754 $44,754 — $44,754 $224,670 214,850 $439,520 $439,520 — $439,520 $439,520 — $439,520 $435,644 3,876 $439,520 Revenue recognized over time represents revenue from mechanic’s lien contracts. $17,928 802 $18,730 $— 18,730 $18,730 $— 18,730 $18,730 $18,730 — $18,730 89 Contract Balances Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations Opening and closing contract balances included in customer and builder deposits on the consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Customer and builder deposits $23,954 $31,978 The aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations on our land sale and lot option contracts is $50.4 million. The Company will recognize the remaining revenue when the lots are taken down, or upon closing for the sale of a land parcel, which is expected to occur as follows (in thousands): The difference between the opening and closing balances of customer and builder deposits results from the timing difference between the customer’s payment of a deposit and the Company’s performance, impacted slightly by terminations of contracts. 2020 2021 2022 Total $30,333 18,940 1,160 $50,433 The amount of deposits on residential units and land and lots held as of the beginning of the period and recognized as revenue during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (in thousands): The timing of lot takedowns is contingent upon a number of factors, including customer needs, the number of lots being purchased, receipt of acceptance of the plat by the municipality, weather-related delays, and agreed-upon lot takedown schedules. 2019 2018 Type of Customer Homebuyer Homebuilder Total deposits recognized as revenue $17,888 $3,417 $21,305 $19,342 $1,806 $21,148 Our contracts with homebuyers have a duration of less than one year. As such, the Company uses the practical expedient as allowed under ASC 606 and has not disclosed the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations as of the end of the reporting period. 11. SEGMENT INFORMATION As a result of the GRBK GHO business combination, customer deposits from homebuyers in the amount of $9.1 million were acquired, of which $8.2 million was recognized during the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The Company has three reportable segments - Builder operations Central, Builder operations Southeast, and Land development. Builder operations Central represents operations of our builders in Texas, whereas Builder operations Southeast represents operations of our builders in Georgia and Florida. Performance Obligations There was no revenue recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 from performance obligations satisfied in prior periods. The operations of the Company’s builders were aggregated in these three reportable segments based on similar economic characteristics, including geography, housing products, class of homebuyer, regulatory environments, and methods used to construct and sell homes. The Company believes such presentation is consistent with the objective and basic principles of ASC 280 and provides the most meaningful information about the types of business activities in which the Company engages and the economic environments in which it operates. 90 Corporate operations are reported as a non-operating segment and include activities which support the Company’s builder operations, land development, title and mortgage operations through centralization of certain administrative functions, such as finance, treasury, information technology and human resources, as well as development of strategic initiatives. Unallocated corporate expenses are reported in the corporate, other and unallocated segment as these activities do not share a majority of aggregation criteria with either the builder operations or land development segments. While the operations of Challenger meet the criteria for an operating segment, they do not meet the quantitative thresholds of ASC 280 to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, Challenger’s results are included within the corporate, other and unallocated segment. Green Brick Title, LLC (“Green Brick Title”), Providence Title and Green Brick Mortgage operations are not economically similar to either builder operations or land development and do not meet the quantitative thresholds of ASC 280 to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, these entities’ results are included within the corporate, other and unallocated segment. Operations of EJB River Holdings do not meet the criteria for an operating segment, and they do not meet the quantitative thresholds of ASC 280 to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, EJB River Holdings’ results are included within the corporate, other and unallocated segment. Segment information for the year ended December 31, 2017 has been restated to conform with the revised segment presentation for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Edgewood Frisco, Texas 91 Financial information relating to the Company’s reportable segments is as follows. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented. Years Ended December 31, (in thousands) December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 2019 2018 2017 Inventory: Builder operations Central $396,900 $282,218 $224,670 Southeast 363,680 760,580 31,080 301,595 583,813 39,834 214,850 Total builder operations 439,520 Land development 18,730 Corporate, other and unallocated (5) $791,660 $623,647 $458,250 Total inventory $251,677 168,140 419,817 308,071 25,679 $753,567 $160,980 159,616 320,596 329,105 19,260 $668,961 Goodwill: (6) Builder operations - Southeast $680 $680 (1) The sum of Builder operations Central and Southeast segments’ revenues does not equal residential units revenue included in the consolidated statements of income in periods when our builders have revenues from land or lot closings, which for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $0.8 million, $4.9 million and $0.0 million, respectively. (2) Corporate, other and unallocated gross loss is comprised of capitalized overhead and capitalized interest adjustments that are not allocated to builder operations and land development segments. (3) Interest expense of Builder operations Central and Southeast segments represents an interest expense charged by Corporate, other and unallocated segment in relation to financing purchases of land and construction of some of the Company’s Dallas and Atlanta builders. Intercompany interest revenue of the Corporate, other and unallocated segment is eliminated in consolidation. (4) Corporate, other and unallocated loss before income taxes includes results from Green Brick Title, Challenger, Green Brick Mortgage, EJB River Holdings, and Providence Title. (5) Corporate, other and unallocated inventory consists of capitalized overhead and interest related to work in process and land under development. (6) In connection with the GRBK GHO business combination, the Company recorded goodwill of $0.7 million. $88,480 92,088 180,568 8,050 (19,536) $169,082 $24,072 15,686 39,758 (39,758) $— $75,006 82,935 157,941 9,334 (13,073) $154,202 $18,207 12,795 31,002 (31,002) $— $64,427 57,820 122,247 5,506 (9,293) $118,460 $11,623 14,141 25,764 (25,764) $— $36,569 $37,535 $36,224 47,210 83,779 10,759 (10,209) $84,329 47,237 84,772 6,155 (9,256) $81,671 34,636 70,860 4,320 (10,943) $64,237 (in thousands) Revenues: (1) Builder operations Central Southeast Total builder operations Land development Total revenues Gross profit: Builder operations Central Southeast Total builder operations Land development Corporate, other and unallocated (2) Total gross profit Interest expense: (3) Builder operations Central Southeast Total builder operations Corporate, other and unallocated Total interest expense Income before income taxes: Builder operations Central Southeast Total builder operations Land development Corporate, other and unallocated (4) Income before income taxes 92 12. INCOME TAXES Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act made major changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Company recognized the income tax effects of the Tax Act in its financial statements in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 which provides SEC staff guidance for the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes. The Company finalized its accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act in the fourth quarter of 2018 with no adjustments recorded during the measurement period. Income Tax Expense The components of current and deferred income tax expense are as follows (in thousands): Current income tax expense (benefit): Federal State Total current income tax expense Deferred income tax expense (benefit): Federal State Total deferred income tax expense Total income tax expense $15,980 2,810 18,790 774 463 1,237 $20,027 $(569) 2,993 2,424 15,023 (311) 14,712 $999 1,733 2,732 36,569 (270) 36,299 $17,136 $39,031 Years Ended December 31, Change in valuation allowance 2019 2018 2017 Change in federal statutory tax rate The income tax expense differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rates of 21%, 21% and 35% for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, to income before income taxes as a result of the following (amounts in thousands): Tax on pre-tax book income (before reduction of noncontrolling interests) Tax effect of non-controlled earnings State income tax expense, net of federal benefit Adjustments to deferred tax assets related to state net operating losses Other Total income tax expense Effective income tax rate Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $17,709 $17,151 $22,483 (1,252) 2,706 1,063 (1,063) — 864 $20,027 23.7% (2,743) 1,940 283 (283) — 788 $17,136 21.0% (3,630) 931 41 (41) 19,017 230 $39,031 60.8% The effective income tax rate for 2017 reflects the impact of compliance with the Tax Act, signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Company remeasured its deferred tax assets due to the change in federal statutory tax rate which resulted in additional tax expense of $19.0 million. The Village at Twin Creeks Allen, Texas 93 Deferred Income Taxes The rollforward of valuation allowance is as follows (amounts in thousands): The primary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands): Valuation allowance at beginning of the year December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Write-off of state net operating losses $9,212 $10,947 Valuation allowance at end of the year Expiration of state net operating losses Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 $1,063 (1,063) - $- $1,346 - (283) $1,063 Deferred tax assets: Basis in partnerships Accrued expenses Inventory Change in fair value of contingent consideration Lease liabilities - operating leases State net operating loss carryover Federal net operating loss carryover Alternative minimum tax credit carryover Stock-based compensation Other Deferred tax assets, gross Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets, net Deferred tax liabilities: Right-of-use assets - operating leases Prepaid insurance Other Deferred tax liabilities 2,206 2,316 1,444 832 — — — 408 191 16,609 — $16,609 $(818) (419) (110) $(1,347) $15,262 2,182 1,521 385 — 1,063 432 576 347 175 17,628 (1,063) $16,565 $— (66) — $(66) $16,499 Uncertain Tax Positions The Company establishes accruals for uncertain tax positions that reflect management’s best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more-likely-than-not basis. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions have a more-likely-than-not chance of being sustained by the Company. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is considered greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. There were no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions for the year ended December 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands): Uncertain tax positions at beginning of year Change related to Georgia state income taxes Uncertain tax positions at end of year Year Ended December 31, 2017 $249 (249) $- There were no expenses for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. There were no accrued liabilities related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Statutes of Limitations Total deferred income tax assets, net Net Operating Losses and Valuation Allowances As of December 31, 2019, all federal net operating loss carryforwards were fully utilized. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company decided to write off its gross state net operating loss carryforwards in Minnesota of $13.7 million, as well as the related deferred tax asset and valuation allowance. Management believes on a more-likely-than-not basis that the Minnesota net operating loss carryforwards would not have been utilized. The U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for our 2016 and subsequent tax years. Due to the carryover of the federal net operating losses for years 2009 and forward, income tax returns going back to the 2009 tax year are subject to adjustment. 94 The Colorado and Minnesota statutes of limitations remain open for our 2015 and subsequent tax years. The Nebraska statute of limitations remains open for our 2016 and subsequent tax years. The computation of basic and diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts): The Company’s subsidiaries file returns in Texas, Georgia and Florida. The Texas statute of limitations remains open for the 2015 and subsequent tax years. Any Texas adjustments relating to returns filed by the subsidiary partnerships would be borne by the subsidiary partnership entities. The Georgia statute of limitations remains open for the 2016 and subsequent tax years. Any Georgia adjustments relating to returns filed by the subsidiary partnerships would be borne by the partner. The Florida statute of limitations will remain open for the 2018 and subsequent tax years. Any Florida adjustments relating to returns filed by the subsidiary partnerships would be borne by the partner. Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $58,656 $51,623 $14,970 Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic 50,530 50,652 49,597 Basic net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share $1.16 $1.02 $0.30 Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic 50,530 50,652 49,597 The Company is not presently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authority. Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards 106 99 86 13. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS We have a qualifying 401(k) defined contribution plan that covers all employees of the Company. Each year, we may make discretionary matching contributions equal to a percentage of the employees’ contributions. The Company contributed $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million of matching contributions to the 401(k) plan during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. 14. EARNINGS PER SHARE The Company’s restricted stock awards have the right to receive forfeitable dividends on an equal basis with common stock and therefore are not considered participating securities that must be included in the calculation of net income per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock awards during each period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect of all dilutive securities, including stock options and restricted stock awards. Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - diluted 50,636 50,751 49,683 Diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share $1.16 $1.02 $0.30 The following shares that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future are not included in the determination of diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share (in thousands): Antidilutive options to purchase common stock and restricted stock awards 14 8 - Years Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 95 15. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments, none of which are held for trading include cash, restricted cash, receivables, earnest money purposes, deposits, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, customer and builder deposits, borrowings on lines of credit, senior unsecured notes, and contingent consideration liability. Per the fair value hierarchy, level 1 financial instruments include: cash, restricted cash, receivables, earnest money deposits, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and customer and builder deposits due to their short-term nature. The Company estimates that, due to the short-term nature of the underlying financial instruments or the proximity of the underlying transaction to the applicable reporting date, the fair value of level 1 financial instruments does not differ materially from the aggregate carrying values recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Level 2 financial instruments include borrowings on lines of credit and senior unsecured notes. Due to the short-term nature and floating interest rate terms, the carrying amounts of borrowings on lines of credit are deemed to approximate fair value. The estimated fair value of the senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2019 was $78.6 million. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the GRBK GHO business combination was estimated using an internally developed discounted cash flow analysis. As the measurement of the contingent consideration is based primarily on significant inputs not observable in the market, it represents a level 3 measurement. Key inputs in measuring the fair value of the contingent consideration liability are management’s projections of GRBK GHO’s net income and debt, and the annual discount rate of 16.5% that reflects the risk associated with achieving the milestones of the contingent consideration payments. The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for level 3 measurements is as follows (in thousands): Contingent consideration liability, balance as of December 31, 2018 $2,207 $2,207 Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Payment of contingent consideration (514) (514) Payment of contingent consideration in excess of acquisition date fair value (1,332) (1,332) Change in fair value of contingent consider- ation 4,906 4,906 Contingent consideration liability, balance as of December 31, 2019 $5,267 $5,267 There were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy for any of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2019 when compared to December 31, 2018. Fair Value of Nonfinancial Instruments Nonfinancial assets and liabilities include inventory which is measured at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected instrument is written down to fair value. Per the fair value hierarchy, these items are level 3 nonfinancial instruments. For additional information on the Company’s inventory, refer to Note 4. 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company had the following related party transactions through the normal course of business. The Parc at Cogburn In September 2015, the Company purchased 11 lots from an entity affiliated with the president of TPG, one of its controlled builders. The lots are part of a 19-home community, The Parc at Cogburn in Atlanta. The total paid for the lots in 2015 was $1.8 million. Under the option contract in place, the 96 Company purchased $0.3 million in lots during the year ended December 31, 2016, and $1.0 million in lots during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company purchased all 19 lots as of December 31, 2017. Company entered into a partnership agreement with an entity affiliated with the president of TPG to develop the land for sale of the lots to TPG. Contributions and profits are shared 50% by the Company and 50% by the affiliated entity. Academy Street In March 2016, the Company purchased undeveloped land for an 83-lot community, Academy Street in Atlanta. Simultaneously, the Company entered into a partnership agreement with an entity affiliated with the president of TPG to develop the land for sale of the lots to TPG. Contributions and profits are shared 80% by the Company and 20% by the affiliated entity. During the year ended December 31, 2017, TPG purchased 62 lots within the community for $11.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018, TPG purchased the remaining 21 lots within the community for $2.9 million. Total capital contributions as of December 31, 2019 were $11.7 million. Total capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2016 were $11.2 million, of which $9.0 million was paid by the Company. Total capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $0.5 million, of which $0.4 million was paid by the Company. There were no capital contributions made to the partnership during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Total capital distributions as of December 31, 2019 were $14.8 million. There were no capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2016. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $11.5 million, of which $9.2 million was paid to the Company. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2018 were $3.3 million, of which $2.7 million was paid to the Company. The capital distributions made during the year ended December 31, 2018 were final, and the affiliated entity has ceased its activity. The Company has consolidated the entity’s results of operations and financial condition into its consolidated financial statements based on its 80% ownership. Suwanee Station In March 2016, the Company purchased undeveloped land for a 73-unit townhome community, Suwanee Station in Atlanta. Simultaneously, the During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, TPG purchased 13, 25, and 27 lots within the community for $0.5 million, $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, there were no lots remaining to be sold to TPG. Total capital contributions as of December 31, 2019 were $2.5 million. Total capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2016 were $1.8 million, of which $0.9 million was paid by the Company. The capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $0.7 million, of which $0.4 million was paid by the Company. The were no capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Total capital distributions as of December 31, 2019 were $3.3 million. There were no capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2016. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $1.5 million, of which $0.7 million was paid to the Company. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2018 were $0.9 million, of which $0.4 million was paid to the Company. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2019 were $0.9 million, of which $0.5 million was paid to the Company. The capital distributions made during the year ended December 31, 2019 were final, and the affiliated entity has ceased its activity. The Company holds two of the three board seats and is able to exercise control over the operations of the partnership and therefore has consolidated the entity’s results of operations and financial condition into its consolidated financial statements. Dunwoody Towneship In June 2016, the Company purchased 14 lots from an entity affiliated with the president of TPG. The lots are part of a 40-unit townhome community, Dunwoody Towneship in Atlanta. The total paid for the 14 lots in 2016 was $1.8 million. The Company purchased the remaining 26 lots during the year ended December 31, 2017 for $3.3 million. 97 Corporate Officers 17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES In February 2017, Richard A. Costello paid a $0.1 million deposit to Centre Living Homes, LLC, one of the Company’s builders, on a townhome. During the fourth quarter of 2017, Mr. Costello closed on the townhome for approximately $0.5 million. In accordance with the Company’s employee discount policy, the contract price resulted in a margin of approximately 13%. In February 2017, Jed Dolson paid a $0.1 million deposit to Centre Living on a townhome. During the fourth quarter of 2017, as allowed for in the Company’s employee discount policy, Mr. Dolson assigned his rights to purchase the townhome to his sister-in-law. The townhome was closed on in the fourth quarter of 2017 for approximately $0.5 million. In accordance with the Company’s employee discount policy, the contract price resulted in a margin of approximately 13%. Trevor Brickman, the son of Green Brick’s Chief Executive Officer, is the President of Centre Living. Following a series of transactions described in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Note 3, effective December 31, 2019, Green Brick’s ownership interest in Centre Living is 90% and Trevor Brickman’s ownership interest is 10%. Green Brick has 90% voting control over the operations of Centre Living. As such, 100% of Centre Living’s operations are included within our consolidated financial statements. GRBK GHO GRBK GHO leases office space from entities affiliated with the president of GRBK GHO. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and during the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018, GRBK GHO incurred a lease cost of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, under such lease agreements. As of December 31, 2019, there were no amounts due to the affiliated entities related to such lease agreements. Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds During the ordinary course of business, certain regulatory agencies and municipalities require the Company to post letters of credit or performance bonds related to development projects. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, letters of credit outstanding were $9.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and performance bonds outstanding totaled $5.4 million and $5.3 million, respectively. The Company does not believe that it is likely that any material claims will be made under a letter of credit or performance bond in the foreseeable future. Warranties Warranty activity, included in accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets, for 2019, 2018 and 2017 consists of the following (in thousands): Warranty accrual, beginning of period 2019 2018 2017 $2,980 $2,083 $1,210 Warranties issued 3,358 2,384 1,454 Changes in liability for existing warranties 37 163 482 Settlements (2,535) (1,650) (1,063) Warranty accrual, end of period $3,840 $2,980 $2,083 Operating Leases GRBK GHO receives title closing services on the purchase of land and third- party lots from an entity affiliated with the president of GRBK GHO. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and during the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018, GRBK GHO incurred de minimus fees related to such title closing services. As of December 31, 2019, no amounts were due to the title company affiliate. The Company has leases associated with office and design center space in Georgia, Texas, and Florida that, at the commencement date, have a lease term of more than 12 months and are classified as operating leases. The exercise of any extension options available in such operating lease contracts is not reasonably certain. Operating lease cost of $1.3 million for these leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. For the year ended December 31, 98 2019, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $1.2 million. Rental expense for these leases totaled $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and was included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted-average remaining lease term and the weighted-average discount rate used in calculating our lease liabilities were 3.3 years and 5.22%, respectively. The future annual undiscounted cash flows in relation to the operating leases and a reconciliation of such undiscounted cash flows to the operating lease liabilities recognized in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 are presented below (in thousands): 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total future lease payments Less: Interest Present value of lease liabilities $1,320 1,096 819 1,218 14 $4,467 $903 $3,564 The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that, at the commencement date, have a lease term of 12 months or less and do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. For such leases, the Company does not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities and instead recognizes lease payments in the consolidated income statements on a straight-line basis. Short-term lease cost of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to such lease contracts is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. Legal Matters Lawsuits, claims and proceedings may be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business. The Company is also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, title company regulations, employment practices and environmental protection. As a result, the Company may be subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations. The Company records an accrual for legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable. The Company accrues for these matters based on facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revises these estimates when necessary. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting outcomes of legal claims and related contingencies, the Company generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. If evaluations indicate loss contingencies that could be material are not probable, but are reasonably possible, the Company will disclose their nature with an estimate of the possible range of losses or a statement that such loss is not reasonably estimable. We believe that the disposition of legal claims and related contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity or on our financial condition. 18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In February 2020, the Company and the minority partner of GRBK GHO amended the operating agreement of GRBK GHO to change the start of the put and purchase options described in Note 2 from April 2021 to April 2024. The Company is currently evaluating the accounting for this change on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. 99 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures has audited our consolidated financial statements included in this report and has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein. The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and, as such, is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, together with our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2019. Based on our evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019. Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based upon Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019. RSM US LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, 100 Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, there were no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our internal control over financial reporting. Challenger Homes, Enclaves at Mountain Vista Colorado Springs, CO Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Green Brick Partners, Inc. necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting We have audited Green Brick Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ RSM US LLP Dallas, Texas March 6, 2020 101 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information required by Part III, Item 12, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Information required by Part III, Item 10, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s proxy statement for its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders (“Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. Information required by Part III, Item 13, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES Information required by Part III, Item 11, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. Information required by Part III, Item 14, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. GHO Homes, Timberlake Vero Beach, FL 102 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: (1) Financial Statements See Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (2) Financial Statement Schedules Financial statements schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. (3) Exhibits The following exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference: Number 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2* 10.1 Exhibit Description Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014). Amended and Restated Bylaws of BioFuel Energy Corp, dated as of March 20, 2009, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 23, 2009). Specimen Common Stock Certificate, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014). Description of Capital Stock. Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of The Providence Group of Georgia, L.L.C., dated as of July 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). 10.2* Second Amended and Restated Company Agreement of CB JENI Homes DFW LLC, dated as of January 1, 2018. 10.3 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of JBGL A&A, LLC, dated November 15, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). 10.4† Green Brick Partners, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2015). 10.5† 10.6† 10.7† 10.8† 10.9 10.10 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2019, between the Company and James R. Brickman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2019). Green Brick Partners, Inc. Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, between the Company and James R. Brickman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014). Employment Agreement, effective as of January 15, 2019, between the Company and Richard A. Costello (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2018). Employment Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2017, between the Company and Jed Dolson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2017). Promissory Note, dated as of October 13, 2011, by JBGL Builder Finance LLC for the benefit of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Promissory Note, dated October 13, 2012, by JBGL Builder Finance LLC for the benefit of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). 103 Number Exhibit Description Second Renewal, Extension and Modification of Promissory Note and Second Amendment to Business Loan Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2013, by and between JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Commercial Security Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2011, by and between JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Commercial Security Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2012 by and between JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Business Loan Agreement (Asset Based), dated as of October 13, 2011, by and between JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Business Loan Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2012, by and between JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Cross-Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, between Inwood National Bank, JBGL Builder Finance LLC and JBGL Model Fund 1, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014). Third Renewal, Extension, and Modification of Promissory Note and Third Amendment to Business Loan Agreement, effective as of September 23, 2014, by and between JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 22, 2015). Loan Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2015, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., Inwood National Bank, JBGL Mustang, LLC, JBGL Exchange, LLC, JBGL Chateau, LLC, Johns Creek 206, LLC and JBGL Builder Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Revolving Line of Credit Note, dated as of July 30, 2015, issued by Green Brick Partners, Inc. in favor of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Guaranty Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2015, by and among JBGL Mustang, LLC, JBGL Chateau, LLC, JBGL Exchange, LLC, JBGL Builder Finance, LLC, and Johns Creek 206, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2015, by JBGL Mustang, LLC, as grantor, to Gary L. Tipton, as trustee, for the benefit of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2015, by JBGL Exchange, LLC, as grantor, to Gary L. Tipton, as trustee, for the benefit of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2015, by JBGL Chateau, LLC, as grantor, to Gary L. Tipton, as trustee, for the benefit of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Deed to Secure Debt, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated as of July 30, 2015, by Johns Creek 206, LLC, as grantor, to Inwood National Bank, as grantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015). Credit Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2015, among Green Brick Partners, Inc., the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2015). Guarantee Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2015, among Green Brick Partners, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Green Brick Partners, Inc. from time to time party thereto, and Citi- bank, N.A., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2015). First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2016, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., Inwood National Bank, JBGL Mustang, LLC, JBGL Exchange, LLC, JBGL Chateau, LLC, Johns Creek 206, First Modification of Promissory Note, dated as of May 3, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2016). Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2016, by GRBK Frisco LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2016). Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2016, by GRBK Frisco LLC, as grantor, to Gary L. Tipton, as trustee, for the benefit of Inwood National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2016). First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2016, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB, the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 1, 2016). Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 1, 2016). 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 10.21 10.22 10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.31 10.32 104 Number 10.33 10.34 10.35 10.36 10.37† 10.38† 10.39 10.40 21* 23* 31.1* 31.2* 32.1* 32.2* Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2017, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., the lenders named therein, Flagstar Bank, FSB, as successor administrative agent, and Citibank, N.A., as existing administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 6, 2017). Amendment No. 4 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2017, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., the lenders named therein, and Flagstar Bank, FSB, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 4, 2017). Exhibit Description Fifth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2018, by and among Green Brick Partners, Inc., the lenders named therein, Flagstar Bank, FSB, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 5, 2018). Third Modification of Promissory Note, dated as of October 26, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 8, 2019). Form of Other Stock-Based Award Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2018). Form of Performance Compensation Award Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2018). Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2019). Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2019). List of Subsidiaries of the Company. Consent of RSM US LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Company. Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241). Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241). Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). 101.INS** XBRL Instance Document. 101.SCH** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. 101.CAL** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. 101.DEF** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. 101.LAB** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. 101.PRE** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. 104** Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document contained in Exhibit 101). * Filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ** Submitted electronically herewith. † Management Contract or Compensatory Plan. # The Company hereby undertakes to furnish a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to such agreement to the SEC upon request. ITEM 16. 10-K SUMMARY None. 105 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 6, 2020. Green Brick Partners, Inc. /s/ James R. Brickman By: James R. Brickman Its: Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated below. Signature /s/ James R. Brickman James R. Brickman Title Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) Date March 6, 2020 /s/ Richard A. Costello Richard A. Costello Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) /s/ Elizabeth K. Blake Elizabeth K. Blake /s/ Harry Brandler Harry Brandler /s/ David Einhorn David Einhorn /s/ John R. Farris John R. Farris /s/ Kathleen Olsen Kathleen Olsen /s/ Richard S. Press Richard S. Press 106 Director Director Chairman of the Board Director Director Director March 6, 2020 March 6, 2020 March 6, 2020 March 6, 2020 March 6, 2020 March 6, 2020 March 6, 2020 Southgate Homes, The Village at Twin Creeks Allen, Texas 107 108 Mailing Address 2805 Dallas Pkwy Suite 400 Plano, TX 75093 Website www.greenbrickpartners.com 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above