HCI Group, Inc. Annual Report 2013

FY2013 Annual Report · HCI Group, Inc.

Loading PDF…

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION EDGAR FILING

Form: 10-K

Date Filed: 2014-03-12

Corporate Issuer CIK: 1400810

© Copyright 2014, Issuer Direct Corporation. All Right Reserved. Distribution of this document is strictly prohibited, subject to the
terms of use.

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF

1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

❑ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934

Commission File Number
001-34126

HCI Group, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida
(State of Incorporation)

20-5961396
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

5300 West Cypress Street, Suite 100
Tampa, FL 33607
(Address, including zip code of principal executive offices)

(813) 849-9500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Shares, no par value
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
7% Series A Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, no par value
8.00% Senior Notes due 2020

New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
NASDAQ Capital Market

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Act. Yes ❑ No ☑

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the

Act. Yes ❑ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ❑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ❑

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ❑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ❑

Non-accelerated filer

❑

Accelerated filer

☑

Smaller reporting company ❑

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange

Act). Yes ❑ No ☑

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2013, computed by

reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold on June 28, 2013, was $293,623,142.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, on March 3, 2014 was 11,146,459.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required by Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy

statement which will be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 Business
Item 1A Risk Factors
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2 Properties
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures

PART I:

PART II:

Page

2-10
10-22
22
23
24
24

Item 5

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities

25-28

Item 6 Selected Financial Data
Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
Item 9B Other Information

29
30-44
44-46
47-100
101
101-102
102

PART III:

Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11 Executive Compensation
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services

103
103
103
103
104

Item 15 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Signatures
Certifications

PART IV:

105-112

113

Table of Contents

ITEM 1 – Business

General

PART I

HCI Group, Inc. (“HCI”), formerly known as Homeowners Choice, Inc., is a Florida-based company owning subsidiaries primarily

engaged in the property and casualty insurance business. HCI was incorporated in 2006. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” “the
Company,” or “HCI” in this Form 10-K generally refer to HCI Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Our principal executive offices are
located at 5300 West Cypress Street, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33607, and our telephone number is (813) 849-9500.

Over the years, we have broadened and diversified our business portfolio through acquisitions to include information
technologies and investment real estate. Based on the organizational structure, revenue sources, and evaluation of financial and
operating performances by management, we have one reportable segment, which includes the following operations:

Insurance Operations

•

Property and casualty insurance

Reinsurance

b) Other Operations

•

Real estate

Information technology

Insurance Operations

Property and Casualty Insurance

Our principal operating subsidiary, Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. (“HCPCI”), was
incorporated and began operations in 2007. Through HCPCI, we currently provide property and casualty homeowners’ insurance,
condominium-owners’ insurance, tenants’ insurance, and dwelling fire insurance to individuals owning or occupying property in Florida
under our Homeowners Choice brand. HCPCI’s operations are supported by certain of HCI’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as
HCI Group, Inc.:

•

Homeowners Choice Managers, Inc. – acts as managing general agent and provides marketing, underwriting, claims

settlement, accounting and financial services to HCPCI; and

•

Southern Administration, Inc. – provides policy administration services to HCPCI.

Table of Contents

HCPCI began operations by participating in a “take-out program” through which we assumed insurance policies held by Citizens

Property Insurance Corporation (“Citizens”), a Florida state- supported insurer. The take-out program is a legislatively mandated
program designed to reduce the State’s risk exposure by encouraging private companies to assume policies from Citizens. We have
assumed policies in ten separate transactions, which took place from July 2007 through November 2013. In addition, we completed a
transaction with HomeWise Insurance Company (“HomeWise”) in November 2011 through which we acquired its Florida policies.
Substantially all of our premium revenue since inception has come from the policies acquired in these assumption transactions and
subsequent renewals. Through the Citizens assumptions and HomeWise policies, we have increased our geographic diversification
within the state of Florida. As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately 160,000 policies in force and $390 million in annualized
gross premiums.

Citizens has historically required us to offer renewals on the policies we acquire in the take-out program for a period of three
years subsequent to the initial expiration of the assumed policies. The policyholders have the option to renew with us or they may
place their coverage with another insurance company. Policyholders also have the option to opt out of the assumption and return to
Citizens. With respect to our November 2012 and 2013 assumptions, the opt-out provision was limited to the thirty-day period
preceding and following the assumption date. We strive to retain these policies by offering competitive rates to our policyholders. We
may selectively pursue additional assumption transactions with Citizens in the future.

We face various challenges to implementing our operating and growth strategies. Since we currently write policies that cover
Florida homeowners, condominium owners, and tenants, we cover losses that may arise from, among other things, catastrophes,
which could have a significant effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. To mitigate our risk of such
catastrophic losses, we cede a portion of our exposure to reinsurers under contracts called catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance
treaties. Even without catastrophic events, we may incur losses and loss adjustment expenses that deviate substantially from our
estimates and that may exceed our reserves, in which case our net income and capital would decrease. Our operating and growth
strategies may also be impacted by regulation of our business by the State of Florida, which must approve our policy forms and
premium rates as well as monitor HCPCI’s compliance with financial and regulatory requirements. Additionally, we may compete with
large, well-established insurance companies, possessing greater financial resources, larger agency networks, and greater name
recognition. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” below.

We plan to enter the property and casualty insurance market in the state of Alabama. Our subsidiary, Homeowners Choice
Assurance Company, Inc. (“HCA”) was approved and licensed by the Alabama Department of Insurance in August 2013 and we
expect to begin writing policies during 2014. Our presence in the state of Alabama will increase our geographic diversification and
support our overall long-term growth strategy.

In addition, HCPCI began writing flood coverage in January 2014. The flood coverage will initially be offered on a limited basis

as a policy endorsement to eligible new and pre-existing Florida customers who are likely most impacted by the significant rate
increases that may result from the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2012.

Table of Contents

Competition

We operate in highly competitive markets where we face competition from national, regional and residual market insurance
companies. We believe that we have approximately 20 material competitors writing homeowners’ property and casualty insurance in
the state of Florida. Since beginning business in 2007, we have grown our business to become the fourth largest provider of
homeowners’ property and casualty insurance in the state of Florida based on September 30, 2013 data from the Florida Office of
Insurance Regulation (“FLOIR”).

Many of our competitors have larger financial capacities, greater resource availability, and more diversification in terms of
insurance coverage. Our competitors include companies which market their products through agents, as well as companies which sell
insurance directly to their customers. Large national insurers may have certain competitive advantages such as increased name
recognition, increased loyalty of their customer base, and reduced policy acquisition costs. We may also face competition from new or
temporary entrants in our niche markets. In some cases, such entrants may, because of inexperience, desire for new business or
other reasons, price their insurance products below ours. Although our pricing is inevitably influenced to some degree by that of our
competitors, we believe that it is generally not in our best interest to compete solely on price.

Our competitive strategies focus on the following key areas:

•

Exceptional service – We are committed to maintaining superior service to our policyholders and agents.

Claims settlement practices – We focus on fair and timely settlement of policyholder claims.

Disciplined underwriting – We analyze exposures and utilize available underwriting data to ensure policies meet our

selective criteria.

•

Effective and efficient use of technology – We strive to add or improve technology that can effectively and efficiently

enhance service to our policyholders and agents.

•

New product offerings – In addition to our recently announced flood program, we may cross-sell additional insurance

products to our existing policyholders in order to broaden our lines of business and product mix.

•

Geographical expansion – We continue to seek opportunities to expand our business within the states of Alabama and

Florida and perhaps into other states to increase overall geographic diversification.

Seasonality of Our Business

Our insurance business is seasonal as hurricanes and tropical storms typically occur during the period from June 1 through
November 30 each year. With our reinsurance treaty year effective on June 1 each year, any variation in the cost of our reinsurance,
whether due to changes in reinsurance rates or a change in the total insured value of our policy base, will occur and be reflected in
our financial results beginning June 1 each year.

Table of Contents

Government Regulation

We are subject to the laws and regulations in Alabama and Florida, and the regulations of any other states in which we may

seek to conduct business in the future. The regulations cover all aspects of our business and are generally designed to protect the
interests of insurance policyholders opposed to the interests of shareholders. Such regulations relate to a wide variety of financial and
non-financial matters including:

•

authorized lines of business;

capital and surplus requirements;

approval of allowable rates and forms;

approval of reinsurance contracts;

investment parameters;

underwriting limitations;

transactions with affiliates;

dividend limitations;

changes in control; and

market conduct.

Our failure to comply with certain provisions of applicable insurance laws and regulations could have a material, adverse effect

on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Regulatory Uncertainty

Certain states including Florida have adopted laws or are considering proposed legislation which, among other things, limit the
ability of insurance companies to effect rate increases or to cancel, reduce or non-renew insurance coverage with respect to existing
policies. The Florida legislature continuously considers bills affecting the residential property insurance market in the state. Current
law penalizes insurers for noncompliance with the insurance code, establishes a private cause of action relating to claims payment
practices, extends the notice period applicable to non-renewals of certain residential policies, prevents non-renewals and cancellation
except for material misrepresentation and non-payment of premium and establishes procedures governing rate filings. Any changes in
such laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our operations or our ability to expand.

State Licensure and Approval

Most states, including Florida, require licensure and regulatory approval prior to the marketing of insurance products. Typically,

licensure review is comprehensive and includes a review of a company’s business plan, solvency, reinsurance, character of its
officers and directors, rates, forms and other financial and non-financial aspects of a company. The regulatory authorities may not
allow entry into a new market by not granting a license. In addition, regulatory authorities may preclude or delay our entry into
markets by disapproving or withholding approval of our product filings.

Table of Contents

Statutory Reporting and Examination

All insurance companies must file quarterly and annual statements with certain regulatory agencies and are subject to regular

and special examinations by those agencies. In accordance with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, all insurance
companies are required to be examined once every five years. However, the FLOIR has the authority to conduct an examination of
HCPCI whenever it is deemed appropriate. HCPCI’s latest FLOIR financial examination related to the year ended December 31,
2010.

Liability for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Our liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses represents our estimate of the total cost of (i) claims that have been
incurred, but not yet paid (case reserves), (ii) claims that have been incurred but not yet reported (“IBNR”), and (iii) loss adjustment
expenses (“LAE”) which are intended to cover the ultimate cost of settling claims, including investigation and defense of lawsuits
resulting from such claims. We base our estimates on various assumptions and actuarial data we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. The process of estimating the liability is inherently judgmental and is influenced by many variables such as past loss
experience, current claim trends and the prevailing social, economic and legal environments.

Significant time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us and our payment of that
loss. Our liability for losses and LAE, which represents the best estimate at a given point in time based on facts, circumstances and
historical trends then known, may necessarily be adjusted to reflect additional facts that become available during the loss settlement
period.

For a discussion and summary of the activity in the liability for losses and LAE for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012

and 2011, see Note 12 — “Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Loss Development

Our liability for losses and LAE represent estimated costs ultimately required to settle all claims for a given period. The following

table illustrates development of the estimated liability for losses and LAE for the years 2007 (inception) through 2013 (amounts in
thousands):

Schedule of Loss Development

Original liability for losses and LAE1
Re-estimated losses and LAE2 as of:

1 year later
2 years later
3 years later
4 years later
5 years later
6 years later

Cumulative redundancy (deficiency)3
Cumulative amount of liability paid as of:

1 year later
2 years later
3 years later
4 years later
5 years later
6 years later

Gross premiums earned

2007
$1,688 $14,763 $ 19,178 $ 22,146 $ 27,424 $ 41,168 $ 43,686

2008

2009

2012

2013

Years Ended December 31,
2011

2010

1,412 10,879 18,399 26,776 27,309 38,712
1,236 10,991 19,866 26,003 28,536
1,268 11,661 19,361 27,226
1,327 11,528 19,617
1,330 11,424
1,330

358 3,339

(439)

(5,080)

(1,112)

2,456

760 7,725 10,481 16,833 15,652 22,365

1,108 9,229 15,336 20,708 21,707
1,108 10,339 17,065 23,732
1,327 10,947 17,992
1,330 11,121
1,330
$9,546 $61,925 $110,011 $119,757 $143,606 $233,607 $337,113

1
2

Represents management’s original estimated liability for (i) unpaid claims, (ii) IBNR, and (iii) loss adjustment expenses.
Represents the re-estimated liabilities in later years for unpaid claims, IBNR and loss adjustment expenses for each of the
respective years.
Represents the difference between the latest re-estimate and the original estimate. A redundancy indicates the original estimate
is higher than the current estimate whereas a deficiency indicates the original estimate is lower than the current estimate.

Table of Contents

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, revenues from property and casualty insurance operations

represented 95.0%, 93.0% and 91.9%, respectively, of total revenues of all operating segments. As a result, we have determined the
property and casualty insurance operations is our only reportable operating segment.

Reinsurance

We have a Bermuda-based wholly-owned reinsurance subsidiary, Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company Ltd., which

participates in HCPCI’s reinsurance program under our Claddaugh brand.

Other Operations

Real Estate

Operating under our Greenleaf Capital brand, real estate operations consist of several properties we own including our

headquarters building in Tampa, Florida and a secondary site in Ocala, Florida, which is used by our insurance operations. In
addition, the Ocala location is planned for use as alternative office space in the event we experience any significant disruption at our
headquarters building. We also own investment real estate in Treasure Island, Florida and Tierra Verde, Florida with a combined 20
acres of waterfront property.

With the exception of the Ocala location, we lease office or retail space at each location to non-affiliates on various terms. In
addition, we own and operate one full-service restaurant and two marinas that we acquired in connection with our purchase of the
waterfront properties. The combined marina facilities offer to the general public: a) one dry-stack boat storage building with capacity
for approximately 180 boats; b) approximately 70 wet slips; c) two fuel facilities; and d) open areas for parking and storage. Dry-stack
boat storage space is generally rented on a monthly or annual basis while the wet slips are rented on a daily or monthly basis.

Information Technology

Our information technology operations include a team of software developers with extensive experience in developing web-

based products and applications for mobile devices. The operations, which are primarily in India, are focused on developing
innovative products or services that can be marketed to the public and also on providing our affiliates with back-office technology
support services that can facilitate and improve ongoing operations.

The technologies originally developed in-house for our own insurance operations were launched for use by third parties under
our Exzeo brand. Exzeo is a free to join, web-based application available at Exzeo.com that enables seamless integration between
organizations, co-workers and business partners. Exzeo allows users to manage projects through communication and collaboration
with other participants in a real-time work environment.

Table of Contents

Financial Highlights

The following table summarizes our financial performance of combined operating segments during the years ended

December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

(Amounts in millions except per share amounts)
For the year ended December 31:
Net premium earned
Total revenue
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Income before income taxes
Net income
Income available to common stockholders
Earnings per share of common stock:

Basic
Diluted

Dividends per common share
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash dividends paid on common stock
At December 31:
Total investments
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Total stockholders’ equity
Common shares outstanding (in millions)

2013
$234.2
$241.1
$ 65.1
$106.5
$ 65.6
$ 65.5

$ 5.82
$ 5.63
$ 0.95
$ 55.5
$ 10.8

$146.0
$293.4
$526.0
$160.5
10.9

2012
$157.7
$163.1
$ 66.3
$ 49.6
$ 30.2
$ 29.8

$ 3.45
$ 3.02
$ 0.88
$106.3
8.1
$

$ 60.9
$230.2
$338.3
$121.3
10.9

2011
$ 88.1
$ 93.8
$ 48.2
$ 16.4
$ 10.0
9.1
$

$ 1.49
$ 1.34
$ 0.53
$ 56.0
3.2
$

$ 58.8
$100.4
$214.8
$ 63.8
6.2

Environmental Matters

Our subsidiaries, which own waterfront property including marina facilities, are subject to regulation under various federal, state,

and local laws concerning the environment, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and the
management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. For a discussion of the
liability assumed in connection with our acquisition of such marina facilities and the ongoing remedial action, see Note 18 —
“Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Employees

As of February 28, 2014, we employed 176 full-time individuals working primarily from our corporate offices in Florida and 78
employees located in India. In addition, our real estate operations have approximately 75 employees leased through professional
employer organizations.

Table of Contents

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly, and current reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These filings are

accessible free of charge on our website, www.hcigroup.com (click “SEC filings” at the “Investor Information” tab), as soon as
reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, which you can access via the SEC’s
website at www.sec.gov. In addition, these filings are accessible at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, which is located at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC
at 1-800-SEC-0330.

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks, including those described below, which could have a material effect on our results

of operations, financial condition or liquidity and, additionally, could cause our operating results to vary significantly from period to
period.

Although we plan to enter the homeowners insurance market in Alabama and other states, our insurance business is
currently in Florida only. Thus, any single catastrophic event or other condition affecting losses in Florida could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.

A single catastrophic event, destructive weather pattern, general economic trend, regulatory developments or other conditions

specifically affecting the state of Florida could have a disproportionately adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and
results of operations. While we actively manage our exposure to catastrophic events through our underwriting process and the
purchase of reinsurance, the fact that our business is concentrated in the state of Florida subjects it to increased exposure to certain
catastrophic events and destructive weather patterns such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornados. Changes in the prevailing
regulatory, legal, economic, political, demographic and competitive environment, and other conditions in the state of Florida could
also make it less attractive for us to do business in Florida and would have a more pronounced effect on our business than it would
on other insurance companies that are geographically diversified. Since our business is concentrated in this manner, the occurrence
of one or more catastrophic events or other conditions affecting losses in the state of Florida could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our results may fluctuate based on many factors including cyclical changes in the insurance industry.

The insurance business historically has been a cyclical industry characterized by periods of intense price competition due to

excessive underwriting capacity, as well as periods when shortages of capacity permitted an increase in pricing and, thus, more
favorable underwriting profits. As premium levels increase, there may be new entrants to the market, which could then lead to a
decrease in premium levels. Any of these factors could lead to a significant reduction in premium rates, less favorable policy terms
and fewer opportunities to underwrite insurance risks, which could have a material, adverse effect on our results of operations and
cash flows. In addition to these considerations, changes in the frequency and severity of losses suffered by insureds and insurers
may affect the cycles of the insurance business significantly.

Table of Contents

We cannot predict whether market conditions will improve, remain constant or deteriorate. Negative market conditions may
impair our ability to write insurance at rates that we consider appropriate relative to the risk assumed. If we cannot write insurance at
appropriate rates, our business would be materially and adversely affected.

Our business could be harmed if we lose the services of our key personnel.

Our operations are highly dependent on the efforts of our senior executive officers, particularly our chief executive officer,
Paresh Patel, as well as our chief financial officer, Richard Allen, and HCPCI’s president, Scott Wallace. The loss of their leadership,
industry knowledge and experience could negatively impact our operations. However, we are developing management succession
plans to lessen any such negative impact. With the exception of Mr. Patel, Mr. Allen and Mr. Wallace, we have no employment
agreements with any of our personnel nor do we offer any guarantee of any employee’s ongoing service. We maintain key-man life
insurance on Mr. Patel although such policy may be insufficient to cover us for the damage resulting to our company from the loss of
Mr. Patel’s services.

We do not have significant redundancy in our operations.

We conduct our business primarily from offices located in Tampa, Florida where tropical storms could damage our facilities or
interrupt our power supply. The loss or significant impairment of functionality in these facilities for any reason could have a material,
adverse effect on our business although we believe we have sufficient redundancies to replace our facilities if functionality is
impaired. We contract with a third party vendor to maintain complete daily backups of our systems, which are stored at the vendor’s
facility in Atlanta, Georgia. Access to these databases is strictly controlled and limited to authorized personnel. While we have
implemented daily off-site backups, we have not fully tested our plan to recover data in the event of a disaster. Additionally, effective
February 28, 2013, we purchased an office building in Ocala, Florida to be used by our insurance operations and, also, as an
alternative location in the event a catastrophic event impacts our home office and support operations. We are currently installing and
testing systems at the Ocala facility.

Our information technology systems may fail or suffer a loss of security, which could adversely affect our business.

Our insurance business is highly dependent upon the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our computer and data
processing systems. We rely on these systems to perform actuarial and other modeling functions necessary for writing business, as
well as to handle our policy administration process (i.e., the printing and mailing of our policies, endorsements, renewal notices, etc.).
The successful operation of our systems depends on a continuous supply of electricity. The failure of these systems or disruption in
the supply of electricity could interrupt our operations and result in a material, adverse effect on our business.

Table of Contents

The development and expansion of our insurance business is dependent upon the successful development and implementation

of advanced computer and data processing systems. Because HCPCI intends to expand its business by writing additional voluntary
policies, we are enhancing our information technology systems to handle and process an increased volume of voluntary policies. The
failure of these systems to function as planned could slow our growth and adversely affect our future business volume and results of
operations.

Because we believe that our independent insurance agents will play a key role in our efforts to increase the number of voluntary
policies written by HCPCI, we are also in the process of developing business platforms and distribution initiatives that will allow us to
provide information to, and exchange information with, our agents in an effective and efficient manner. These systems are intended to
provide us with current information regarding the insurance markets in which we operate, therefore permitting us to adjust our
selective underwriting criteria as needed to rapidly respond to market changes. In the event the development of these systems does
not proceed as planned, the expansion of our business could be delayed. Internet disruptions or system failures could also adversely
affect our future business volume and results of operations.

In addition, a security breach of our computer systems could damage our reputation or result in liability. We retain confidential

business and policyholder information in our computer systems. We may be required to spend significant capital and other resources
to protect against security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. It is critical that these facilities and
infrastructure remain secure. Despite the implementation of security measures, this infrastructure may be vulnerable to physical
break-ins, computer viruses, programming errors, attacks by third parties or similar disruptive problems. In addition, we could be
subject to liability if hackers were able to penetrate our network security or otherwise misappropriate confidential information.

Increased competition, competitive pressures, industry developments, and market conditions could affect the growth of our
business and adversely impact our financial results.

The property and casualty insurance industry in Florida is cyclical and highly competitive. We compete not only with other stock
companies but also with mutual companies, other underwriting organizations and alternative risk sharing mechanisms. Our principal
lines of business are written by numerous other insurance companies. Competition for any one account may come from very large,
well-established national companies, smaller regional companies, other specialty insurers in our field, and other companies that write
insurance only in Florida. Many of these competitors have greater financial resources, larger agency networks and greater name
recognition than our company. We compete for business not only on the basis of price, but also on the basis of financial strength,
types of coverage offered, availability of coverage desired by customers, commission structure, and quality of service. We may have
difficulty continuing to compete successfully on any of these bases in the future. Competitive pressures coupled with market
conditions may affect our rate of premium growth and financial results.

Table of Contents

Our ability to compete in the property and casualty insurance industry and our ability to expand our business may be negatively
affected by the fact that we are not a long-established company. HCPCI has obtained a Demotech rating of “A Exceptional,” which is
accepted by major mortgage companies operating in the state of Florida and many other states. In addition, mortgage companies
may require homeowners to obtain property insurance from an insurance company with an acceptable A.M. Best rating. Such a
requirement could prevent us from expanding our business, which may in turn limit our ability to compete with large, national
insurance companies and certain regional insurance companies. We currently do not have an A.M. Best rating but may seek to obtain
such a rating. A downgrade or loss of our Demotech rating could result in a substantial loss of business in the event insureds move
their business to insurers with a sufficient financial strength rating.

There are inherent limitations and risks related to our projections and our estimates of claims and loss reserves. If our actual
losses exceed our loss reserves, our financial results, our ability to expand our business, and our ability to compete in the property
and casualty insurance industry may be negatively affected. In addition, industry developments could further increase competition in
our industry. These developments could include —

•

an influx of new capital in the marketplace as existing companies attempt to expand their businesses and new companies

attempt to enter the insurance business as a result of better pricing and/or terms;

•

new programs or changes to existing programs in which federally or state-sponsored entities provide property insurance in

catastrophe-prone areas or other alternative markets;

changes in Florida or any other states’ regulatory climate; and

the enactment of federal proposals for an optional federal charter that would allow some competing insurers to operate

under regulations different or less stringent than those applicable to our insurance subsidiaries.

•

These developments and others could make the property and casualty insurance marketplace more competitive by increasing

the supply of insurance available.

If competition limits our ability to write new business at adequate rates, our future results of operations would be adversely

affected.

If our actual losses from claims exceed our loss reserves, our financial results would be adversely affected.

Our objective is to establish loss reserves that are adequate and represent management’s best estimate; that is, the amounts

initially recorded as reserves should approximate the ultimate cost to investigate and settle a specific claim. However, the process of
establishing adequate reserves is complex and inherently uncertain, and the ultimate cost of a claim may vary materially from the
amounts reserved. We regularly monitor and evaluate loss and loss adjustment expense reserve development to determine reserve
adequacy.

Table of Contents

Due to these uncertainties, the ultimate losses may vary materially from current loss reserves which could have a material,

adverse effect on our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The failure of our claims department to pay claims accurately could adversely affect our insurance business, financial
results and capital requirements.

We rely on our claims department to accurately evaluate and pay the claims made under our policies. Many factors could affect

the ability of our claims department to accurately evaluate and pay claims, including the accuracy of our external independent
adjusters as they make their assessments and submit their estimates of damages; the training, background, and experience of our
claims representatives; the ability of our claims department to ensure consistent claims handling given the input by our external
independent adjusters; the ability of our claims department to translate the information provided by our external independent adjusters
into acceptable claims settlements; and the ability of our claims department to maintain and update its claims handling procedures
and systems as they evolve over time based on claims and geographical trends in claims reporting. Any failure to pay claims
accurately could lead to material litigation, undermine our reputation in the marketplace, impair our corporate image and negatively
affect our financial results.

The effects of emerging claim and coverage issues on our business are uncertain.

As industry practices and legal, judicial, social and other environmental conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues
related to claims and coverage may emerge. These issues may adversely affect our business by either extending coverage beyond
our underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent
until sometime after we have issued insurance contracts that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under
our insurance contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued and renewed, and our financial position and
results of operations may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to expand our business because our capital must be used to pay greater than anticipated claims, our
financial results may suffer.

Our future growth will depend on our ability to expand the number of insurance policies we write, to expand the kinds of

insurance products we offer, and to expand the geographic markets in which we do business, all balanced by the insurance risks we
choose to assume and cede. Our existing sources of funds include possible sales of our securities and our income from operations
and investments. Unexpected catastrophic events in our market areas, such as the hurricanes experienced in Florida and other
states, may result in greater claims losses than anticipated, which could require us to limit or halt our growth while we redeploy our
capital to pay these unanticipated claims unless we are able to raise additional capital.

Table of Contents

HCI Group, Inc. depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to generate and transfer funds to meet its debt obligations.

HCI Group, Inc. does not have significant revenue generating operations of its own. Our ability to make scheduled payments on

our debt obligations depends on the financial condition and operating performance of our subsidiaries. If the funds we receive from
our subsidiaries are insufficient to meet our debt obligations, we may be required to raise funds through the issuance of additional
debt or equity securities, reduce or suspend dividend payments, or sell assets.

We may require additional capital in the future which may not be available or may only be available on unfavorable terms.

Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including our ability to write new business successfully and to establish

premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to cover losses. To the extent that our present capital is insufficient to meet future
operating requirements or to cover losses, we may need to raise additional funds through financings or curtail our growth. Based on
our current operating plan, we believe current capital together with our anticipated retained income will support our operations.
However, we cannot provide any assurance in that regard, since many factors will affect our capital needs and their amount and
timing, including our growth and profitability, and the availability of reinsurance, as well as possible acquisition opportunities, market
disruptions and other unforeseeable developments. If we require additional capital, it is possible that equity or debt financing may not
be available at all or may be available only on terms unfavorable to us. Equity financings could result in dilution to our shareholders,
and in any case such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of existing shareholders. If we
cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms or at all, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially affected.

Our financial results may be negatively affected by the fact that a portion of our income is generated by the investment of
our available cash.

A portion of our income is, and likely will continue to be generated by the investment of our available cash. The amount of

income so generated is a function of our investment policy, available investment opportunities, and the amount of available cash
invested. At December 31, 2013, approximately 31% of our available cash was invested in fixed-maturity and equity securities with
the balance in cash and cash equivalents. We may alter our investment policy to accept higher levels of risk with the expectation of
higher returns. Fluctuating interest rates and other economic factors make it impossible to estimate accurately the amount of
investment income that will be realized. In fact, we may realize losses on our investments.

Table of Contents

Reinsurance coverage may not be available to us in the future at commercially reasonable rates or at all and we risk non-
collectability of reinsurance amounts due us from reinsurers with which we have contracted.

Reinsurance is a method of transferring part of an insurance company’s liability and premium under an insurance policy to

another insurance company. We use reinsurance arrangements to limit and manage the amount of risk we retain, to stabilize our
underwriting results and to increase our underwriting capacity. The cost of such reinsurance is subject to prevailing market conditions
beyond our control such as the amount of capital in the reinsurance market and natural and man-made catastrophes. We cannot be
assured that reinsurance will remain continuously available to us in the amounts we consider sufficient and at prices acceptable to us.
As a result, we may determine to increase the amount of risk we retain or look for other alternatives to reinsurance, which could in
turn have a material, adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

With respect to the reinsurance treaties we currently have in effect, our ability to recover amounts due from reinsurers is subject
to the reinsurance company’s ability and willingness to pay and to meet their obligations to us. We attempt to select financially strong
reinsurers with an A.M. Best rating of “A-” or better or we require the reinsurer to fully collateralize its exposure. While we monitor
from time to time their financial condition, we rely principally on A.M. Best, our broker, and other rating agencies in determining their
ability to meet their obligations to us. Any failure on the part of any one reinsurance company to meet its obligations to us could have
a material, adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have exposure to unpredictable catastrophes, which can materially and adversely affect our financial results.

We write insurance policies that cover homeowners, condominium owners, and tenants for losses that result from, among other
things, catastrophes. We are therefore subject to losses, including claims under policies we have written, arising out of catastrophes
that may have a significant effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. A significant catastrophe could also
have an adverse effect on our reinsurers. Catastrophes can be caused by various events, including hurricanes, tropical storms,
tornadoes, windstorms, earthquakes, hailstorms, explosions, power outages, fires and by man-made events, such as terrorist attacks.
The incidence and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable. The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both
the total amount of insured exposure in the area affected by the event and the severity of the event. Our policyholders are currently
concentrated in Florida, which is especially subject to adverse weather conditions such as hurricanes and tropical storms. Therefore,
although we attempt to manage our exposure to catastrophes through our underwriting process and the purchase of reinsurance
protection, an especially severe catastrophe or series of catastrophes could exceed our reinsurance protection and may have a
material, adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Industry trends, such as increased litigation against the insurance industry and individual insurers, the willingness of
courts to expand covered causes of loss, rising jury awards, and the escalation of loss severity may contribute to increased
costs and to the deterioration of the reserves of our insurance subsidiary.

Loss severity in the property and casualty insurance industry may increase and may be driven by larger court judgments. In the
event legal actions and proceedings are brought on behalf of classes of complainants, this may increase the size of judgments. The
propensity of policyholders and third party claimants to litigate and the willingness of courts to expand causes of loss and the size of
awards may render our loss reserves inadequate for current and future losses.

The failure of the risk mitigation strategies we utilize could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.

We utilize a number of strategies to mitigate risk exposure within our insurance business, which include:

•

engaging in vigorous underwriting;

carefully evaluating terms and conditions of our policies;

focusing on our risk aggregations by geographic zones and other bases; and

ceding insurance risk to reinsurance companies.

However, there are inherent limitations in all of these tactics. We cannot provide assurance that an event or series of

unanticipated events will not result in loss levels which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.

The failure of any of the loss limitation methods we employ could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition
or our results of operations.

Our insurance underwriting process is designed to limit our exposure to known risks, including but not limited to exclusions

relating to homes in close proximity to the coastline. Various provisions of our policies, such as limitations or exclusions from
coverage, which have been negotiated to limit our risks, may not be enforceable in the manner we intend.

In addition, the policies we issue contain conditions requiring the prompt reporting of claims to us and our right to decline

coverage in the event of a violation of that condition. While our insurance product exclusions and limitations reduce the loss exposure
to us and help eliminate known exposures to certain risks, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void an
exclusion or legislation could be enacted modifying or barring the use of such endorsements and limitations in a way that would
adversely affect our loss experience, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

In the future, we may rely on independent agents to write our insurance policies, and if we are not able to contract with and
retain independent agents, our revenues would be negatively affected.

Although voluntary policies comprise a small percentage of our business, we expect to increase the number of voluntary policies
we write as our business expands. An inability to sell our products through independent agents would negatively affect our revenues.

We must compete with other insurers for independent agents’ business. Our competitors may offer a greater variety of insurance
products, lower premiums for insurance coverage, or higher commissions to their agents. If our products, pricing and commissions do
not remain competitive, we may find it more difficult to attract business from independent agents to sell our products. A material
reduction in the amount of our products that independent agents sell could negatively affect our revenues.

Our success depends on our ability to accurately price the risks we underwrite.

The results of our operations and our financial condition depend on our ability to underwrite and set premium rates accurately for

a wide variety of risks, including risks associated with new product offerings. Rate adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient
premiums to pay losses, loss adjustment expenses, and underwriting expenses and to earn a profit. In order to price our products
accurately, we must collect and properly analyze a substantial amount of data; develop, test and apply appropriate rating formulas;
closely monitor and timely recognize changes in trends; and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy.
Our ability to undertake these efforts successfully, and as a result price our products accurately, is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, some of which are outside our control, including —

•

the availability of sufficient reliable data and our ability to properly analyze available data;

the uncertainties that inherently characterize estimates and assumptions;

our selection and application of appropriate rating and pricing techniques;

changes in legal standards, claim settlement practices, and restoration costs; and

legislatively imposed consumer initiatives.

In addition, we could underprice risks, which would negatively affect our profit margins. We could also overprice risks, which

could reduce our sales volume and competitiveness. In either event, our profitability could be materially and adversely affected.

Use of current operating resources may be necessary to develop future new insurance products.

We may expand our product offerings by underwriting additional insurance products and programs, and marketing them through

our independent agent network. For example, we recently announced plans to offer flood coverage to our policyholders. Moreover,
Claddaugh may offer reinsurance products to unaffiliated insurance companies. Expansion of our product offerings will result in
increases in expenses due to additional costs incurred in actuarial rate justifications, software and personnel. Offering additional
insurance products will also require regulatory approval, further increasing our costs and potentially affecting the speed with which we
will be able to pursue new market opportunities. We cannot assure you that we will be successful bringing new insurance products to
our marketplace.

Table of Contents

Use of current operating resources may be necessary to expand our insurance businesses geographically.

Although we currently conduct our homeowners’ insurance business in Florida, we plan to enter the homeowners’ insurance
markets in other states. HCA, our Alabama insurance subsidiary, was recently approved and licensed by the Alabama Department of
Insurance and is expected to begin writing policies in Alabama during 2014. We may offer insurance products in other states as well.
Geographic expansion of our insurance business will result in increases in expenses due to additional costs incurred in actuarial rate
justifications, software, personnel and regulatory compliance. Although we plan to enter other states judiciously with attention to
profitability, we cannot assure you that our entry into other states will be successful.

As an insurance holding company, we are currently subject to regulation by the states of Alabama and Florida and in the
future may become subject to federal regulation.

All states regulate insurance holding company systems. State statutes and administrative rules generally require each insurance

company in the holding company group to register with the department of insurance in its state of domicile and to furnish information
concerning the operations of the companies within the holding company system that may materially affect the operations,
management or financial condition of the insurers within the group. As part of its registration, each insurance company must identify
material agreements, relationships and transactions with affiliates, including without limitation, loans, investments, asset transfers,
transactions outside of the ordinary course of business, certain management, service, and cost sharing agreements, reinsurance
transactions, dividends, and consolidated tax allocation agreements.

Insurance holding company regulations generally provide that transactions between an insurance company and its affiliates

must be fair and equitable, allocated between the parties in accordance with customary accounting practices, and fully disclosed in
the records of the respective parties. Many types of transactions between an insurance company and its affiliates, such as transfers
of assets among such affiliated companies, certain dividend payments from insurance subsidiaries and certain material transactions
between companies within the system may be subject to prior approval by, or prior notice to, state regulatory authorities. If we are
unable to obtain the requisite prior approval for a specific transaction, we would be precluded from taking the action, which could
adversely affect our operations. In addition, state insurance regulations also frequently impose notice or approval requirements for the
acquisition of specified levels of ownership in the insurance company or insurance holding company.

In addition to Florida and Alabama, we may in the future seek authorization to transact business in other states as well. We will

therefore become subject to the laws and regulatory requirements of those states. These regulations may vary from state to state,
and states occasionally may have conflicting regulations. Currently, the federal government’s role in regulating or dictating the policies
of insurance companies is limited. However, Congress, from time to time, considers proposals that would increase the role of the
federal government in insurance regulation, either in addition to or in lieu of state regulation. The impact of any future federal
insurance regulation on our insurance operations is unclear and may adversely impact our business or competitive position.

Table of Contents

Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation, which may reduce our profitability or limit our growth.
Moreover, if we fail to comply with these regulations, we may be subject to penalties, including fines and suspensions,
which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The insurance industry is highly regulated and supervised. Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to the supervision and
regulation of the states in which they are domiciled and the states in which they transact insurance business (currently Alabama and
Florida). Such supervision and regulation is primarily designed to protect our policyholders rather than our shareholders. These
regulations are generally administered by a department of insurance in each state and relate to, among other things —

•

the content and timing of required notices and other policyholder information;

the amount of premiums the insurer may write in relation to its surplus;

the amount and nature of reinsurance a company is required to purchase;

participation in guaranty funds and other statutorily created markets or organizations;

business operations and claims practices;

approval of policy forms and premium rates;

standards of solvency, including risk-based capital measurements;

licensing of insurers and their products;

restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments;

restrictions on the ability of insurance company subsidiaries to pay dividends to insurance holding companies;

restrictions on transactions between insurance companies and their affiliates;

restrictions on the size of risks insurable under a single policy;

requiring deposits for the benefit of policyholders;

requiring certain methods of accounting;

periodic examinations of our operations and finances;

Table of Contents

•

the form and content of records of financial condition required to be filed; and

the level of reserves.

The FLOIR and regulators in other jurisdictions where we may become licensed and offer insurance products conduct periodic

examinations of the affairs of insurance companies and require the filing of annual and other reports relating to financial condition,
holding company issues and other matters. These regulatory requirements may adversely affect or inhibit our ability to achieve some
or all of our business objectives. These regulatory authorities also conduct periodic examinations into insurers’ business practices.
These reviews may reveal deficiencies in our insurance operations or non-compliance with regulatory requirements.

HCPCI is subject to assessments levied by the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. While we can recover these
assessments from policyholders through policy surcharges, our payment of the assessments and our recoveries may not offset each
other in the same reporting period in our financial statements and may cause a material, adverse effect on our results of operations in
a particular reporting period.

In addition, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the

violation of regulations. In some instances, we follow practices based on our interpretations of regulations or practices that we believe
may be generally followed by the industry. These practices may turn out to be different from the interpretations of regulatory
authorities. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements,
insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities or otherwise
penalize us. This could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

Finally, changes in the level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or

interpretations by regulatory authorities could adversely affect our ability to operate our business, reduce our profitability and limit our
growth.

Our marina operations are subject to regulation under various federal, state, and local laws concerning the environment.

Our marina operations are subject to regulation under various federal, state, and local laws concerning the environment,

including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and the management and disposal of hazardous
substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and
civil or criminal sanctions and third-party damage or personal injury claims, if in the future we were to violate or become liable under
environmental laws relating to our marina operations. With respect to an existing environmental remediation plan for the real estate in
Tierra Verde, Florida, there can be no assurance that the remediation plan will be successful or that the cost will not exceed the
$150,000 accrued at acquisition, of which $117,000 had been paid at December 31, 2013.

Table of Contents

Our restaurant operations expose us to additional risks, which could negatively impact our operating results and financial
condition.

In April 2012, we acquired real estate in Treasure Island, Florida that includes a restaurant. Our restaurant operations could
expose us to business risks that are different from the insurance business. For example, restaurant operations are dependent in large
part on food, beverage, and supply costs that are not within our control. Also, the restaurant industry is affected by changes in
consumer preferences and discretionary spending patterns that could adversely affect revenues from restaurant operations.
Moreover, the restaurant industry is affected by litigation and publicity concerning food quality, health, and other issues which can
cause guests to avoid restaurants and that can result in liabilities. Any one of these risks, among others, could negatively impact our
operating results and financial condition.

Our operations in India expose us to additional risks, which could negatively impact our business, operating results, and
financial condition.

Our India operations expose us to additional risks including currency exchange rate fluctuations and risks related to other
challenges caused by distance, language, and compliance with Indian labor laws and other complex foreign and U.S. laws and
regulations that apply to our India operations. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include anti-corruption
laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials, among
others. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, or criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or
our employees. Although policies and procedures are designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be
no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies.

Unintended consequences of the anti-takeover provisions of our shareholder rights agreement.

Our shareholder rights agreement is intended to deter coercive or unfair takeover tactics and to protect our shareholders’
interests by encouraging anyone seeking control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors. However, these rights may
discourage, delay or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt, including offers or attempts that could be beneficial to our
shareholders. In addition, the rights agreement may deter investors from participating in any future equity offerings we propose.

ITEM 1B – Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 – Properties

Real Estate Owned and Used in Operations

Tampa, Florida. The real estate consists of 3.5 acres of land, a building with gross area of 122,000 square feet, and a four-level

parking garage. This facility is used by us and our U.S. subsidiaries and serves as our principal executive and operational office. In
addition, we lease an aggregate of approximately 45,000 square feet to non-affiliates.

Ocala, Florida. The real estate consists of 1.6 acres of land and an office building with gross area of approximately 16,000

square feet. The facility is designated for our insurance operations and will be used as an alternative location in the event a
catastrophic event impacts our operations in Tampa, Florida.

Investment Real Estate

Treasure Island, Florida. The real estate consists of approximately 10 acres of waterfront property and land improvements, a

restaurant and a marina facility. The marina facility and the restaurant are currently operated by us.

Tierra Verde, Florida. The real estate consists of 7.1 acres of land, a dry rack storage building with gross area of 57,500 square

feet, and three buildings with retail space having an aggregate gross area of 25,082 square feet. This marina facility is being
operated by us. Approximately 71% of the available retail space is leased to non-affiliates.

Leased Property

Noida, India. We lease 15,000 square feet of office space for our information technology operations. The lease has an initial

term of nine years commencing January 15, 2013. We are entitled to terminate the lease after the 36-month period following the
commencement date by providing 3 months’ written notice to the landlord.

Rental expense under all facility leases was $248,000, $527,000 and $239,000 during the years ended December 31, 2013,

2012 and 2011, respectively, which includes in 2012 and 2011 expense related to our former corporate headquarters.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3 – Legal Proceedings

We are a party to claims and legal actions arising routinely in the ordinary course of our business. Although we cannot predict

with certainty the ultimate resolution of the claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding
to which we are a party will have a material, adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 – Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities

Markets for Common Stock

Our common stock is trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HCI.” Prior to October 25, 2012, our common

stock was traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “HCII.” The following table represents the high and low
sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the New York Stock Exchange for the
periods indicated:

Calendar Quarter—2013

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Calendar Quarter—2012

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Common Stock
Price

High

Low

$27.25
$35.21
$41.66
$53.50

$14.14
$17.60
$23.98
$26.60

20.16
24.66
29.99
37.79

7.88
11.85
16.51
18.29

Holders

As of February 28, 2014, the market price for our common stock was $48.42 and there were 132 holders of record of our

common stock.

Table of Contents

Dividends

The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors. Our ability to pay dividends depends on

many factors, including the Company’s operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, and legal and regulatory
constraints and requirements on the payment of dividends and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. The
following table represents the frequency and amount of all cash dividends declared on common equity for the two most recent fiscal
years:

Declaration
Date
1/16/2012
3/28/2012
7/25/2012
10/19/2012
10/19/2012
1/22/2013
4/8/2013
7/16/2013
10/18/2013

Payment
Date
3/16/2012
6/15/2012
9/21/2012
12/21/2012
12/21/2012
3/15/2013
6/21/2013
9/20/2013
12/20/2013

Date of
Record
2/17/2012
5/17/2012
8/17/2012
11/16/2012
11/16/2012
2/15/2013
5/17/2013
8/16/2013
11/15/2013

Per Share
Amount
$0.150
$0.200
$0.200
$0.225
$0.100
$0.225
$0.225
$0.225
$0.275

Under Florida law, a domestic insurer such as HCPCI may not pay any dividend or distribute cash or other property to its
stockholder unless certain requirements, which are discussed in Note 20 — “Regulatory Requirements and Restrictions” to our
consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are met.

We currently expect that we will continue to pay cash dividends on our common stock at a rate comparable to our historical
dividend payments, although we are not obligated to do so and may discontinue cash dividends or change the cash-dividend rate on
our common stock at any time and for any reason.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013. We currently have no equity

compensation plans not approved by our stockholders.

(a)

(b)

Number of Securities
To be Issued Upon
Exercise of

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options

(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))

Plan Category
Equity Compensation Plans

Approved by Stockholders

280,000

2.91

4,344,350

Table of Contents

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the 5-year cumulative total dollar return to shareholders on our common stock relative to the
cumulative total returns of the Russell 2000 Index and the NASDAQ Insurance Index. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all
dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each index on December 31, 2008 and its relative
performance is tracked through December 31, 2013. The returns shown are based on historical results and are not intended to
suggest future performance.

Table of Contents

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

All information related to sales of unregistered securities had been reported in a current report on Form 8-K.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below includes the number of shares of common stock surrendered by employees to satisfy their minimum federal

income tax liability associated with the vesting of restricted shares and also the number of common shares repurchased under a
prepaid forward contract (share amounts not in thousands) in conjunction with our December 2013 convertible note offering:

For the Month Ended
October 31, 2013
November 30, 2013
December 31, 2013 (b)

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
1,641
—
622,751

Average
Price Paid
Per Share
$ 42.24
—
48.05

624,392

$ 48.03

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (a)

Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under The Plans
or Programs (a)

n/a
n/a
n/a

(a) As of December 31, 2013, there was no established share repurchase plan.
(b)

622,751 represents the number of shares repurchased under the prepaid forward contract (see Note 15 — “Stockholders’
Equity” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Table of Contents

ITEM 6 – Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing
in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of
income data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 and the consolidated balance sheet data at December 31,
2013 and 2012 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-
K. The consolidated statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated balance
sheet data at December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any
future period.

2013

As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
2011
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

2010

2012

2009

Operating Revenue
Gross premiums earned
Premiums ceded

Net premiums earned
Net investment income
Policy fee income
Net realized investment gains
Gain on bargain purchase
Other income

Total operating revenue

Operating Expenses
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
Interest expense
Goodwill impairment loss
Other operating expenses

Total operating expenses

Income before income taxes
Income tax expense

Net income
Preferred stock dividends

$ 337,113
(102,865)

$233,607
(75,939)

$143,606
(55,525)

$119,757
(57,322)

$110,011
(44,674)

234,248
1,469
3,098
80
—
2,193

157,668
980
2,538
276
179
1,424

88,081
2,061
1,438
290
936
1,003

62,435
1,962
1,464
2,003
—
751

65,337
1,793
1,226
—
—
22

241,088

163,065

93,809

68,615

68,378

65,123
31,619
3,607
—
34,286

66,310
25,930
—
161
21,084

48,243
18,129
—
—
11,032

37,667
14,878
—
—
7,484

35,230
9,611
—
—
5,788

134,635

113,485

77,404

60,029

50,629

106,453
40,891

49,580
19,423

16,405
6,441

8,586
3,164

17,749
6,839

$ 65,562
(104)

$ 30,157
(322)

9,964
(815)

5,422
—

$ 10,910
—

Income available to common stockholders

$ 65,458

$ 29,835

9,149

5,422

$ 10,910

Per Share Data:

Basic earnings per common share

Diluted earnings per common share

Dividends per common share

Ratios to Net Premium Earned:

Loss Ratio
Expense Ratio

Combined Ratio

Ratios to Gross Premiums Earned:

Loss Ratio
Expense Ratio

Combined Ratio

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Total investments
Total cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Total stockholders’ equity

5.82

3.45

1.49

0.88

5.63

3.02

1.34

0.81

0.95

0.88

0.53

0.30

27.80%
29.67%

57.47%

19.32%
20.62%

39.94%

42.06%
29.92%

71.98%

28.39%
20.19%

48.58%

54.77%
33.11%

87.88%

33.59%
20.31%

53.90%

60.33%
35.82%

96.15%

31.45%
18.67%

50.12%

1.62

1.52

—

53.92%
23.57%

77.49%

32.02%
14.00%

46.02%

$ 146,028
$ 293,398
$ 526,316
$ 160,521

$ 60,916
$230,214
$338,288
$121,253

$ 58,759
$100,355
$214,818
$ 63,830

$ 43,481
$ 54,849
$140,948
$ 46,629

$ 48,343
$ 43,453
$137,892
$ 45,378

Table of Contents

ITEM 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included

elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. All dollar amounts, except per share amounts stated in this Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are in thousands unless specified otherwise.

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements as defined

under federal securities laws. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements about our plans,
objectives, expectations, assumptions or future events. These statements involve estimates, assumptions, known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results,
performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited
to the effect of governmental regulation; changes in insurance regulations; the frequency and extent of claims;
uncertainties inherent in reserve estimates; catastrophic events; a change in the demand for, pricing of, availability of or
collectability of reinsurance; restrictions on our ability to change premium rates; increased rate pressure on premiums; and
other risks and uncertainties and other factors listed under Item 1A — “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report
on Form 10-K and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

OVERVIEW

General

HCI is a Florida-based holding company primarily providing property and casualty insurance to homeowners, condominium
owners, and tenants in the state of Florida through its subsidiaries. We offer insurance products at competitive rates, while pursuing
profitability using selective underwriting criteria.

We began operations in 2007 by participating in a “take-out program” which is a legislatively mandated program designed to
encourage private companies to assume policies from Citizens. Our growth since inception has resulted primarily from a series of
policy assumptions from Citizens and one assumption transaction with HomeWise Insurance Company (“HomeWise”). This growth
track has been beneficial to us in terms of reduced policy acquisition and reinsurance costs. Even though expanding our policyholder
base through opportunistic assumptions continues to be important to our growth plan, we plan to seek opportunities to expand and to
provide new product offerings such as our flood product, which we began offering in January 2014.

Table of Contents

Recent Developments

On February 4, 2014, we announced our Board of Directors fixed April 1, 2014 as the cancellation date for the conversion rights

on our 7% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock (“Series A Preferred”). As such, the record holders of the Series A
Preferred will no longer have conversion rights on and after April 1, 2014. In addition, on February 27, 2014 we voluntarily delisted
our Series A Preferred from the NASDAQ Capital Market.

On January 23, 2014, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.275 per common share. The dividends will be

paid March 21, 2014 to stockholders of record on February 21, 2014. In addition, HCPCI, our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary,
announced it began writing flood insurance coverage in the state of Florida to eligible new and pre-existing Homeowners Choice
customers.

On January 13, 2014, we announced that a U.S. appeals court affirmed a trial court decision in our favor in connection with a

dispute with insurance intermediary Aon Benfield relating to a 2009 revenue sharing agreement.

In December 2013, we completed the issuance of our 3.875% convertible senior notes due 2019 for aggregate proceeds of

$103,000 in a private offering. We used $29,923 of the proceeds to repurchase shares of our common stock.

Effective November 5, 2013, we assumed approximately 34,000 policies upon completion of our tenth assumption transaction

with Citizens representing approximately $78,000 in additional annualized premiums.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2013 to the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 reflect income available to common stockholders of $65,458, or

$5.63 earnings per diluted common share, compared with income available to common stockholders of $29,835, or $3.02 earnings
per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Revenue

Gross Premiums Earned for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $337,113 and $233,607, respectively, and
primarily reflect the revenue from policies acquired from HomeWise and Citizens and subsequent renewals. The increase in 2013
was primarily attributable to revenue from the Citizens assumptions completed in November 2013 and 2012.

Table of Contents

Premiums Ceded for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $102,865 and $75,939, respectively. Our premiums

ceded represent amounts paid to reinsurers to cover losses from catastrophes that exceed the thresholds defined by our catastrophe
excess of loss reinsurance treaties. During the year ended December 31, 2013, premiums ceded were reduced by $12,521 related to
the provisions under certain reinsurance contracts. See “Economic Impact of Reinsurance Contracts with Retrospective Provisions”
under “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” Our reinsurance rates are based primarily on policy exposures reflected in gross
premiums earned. Premiums ceded were 30.5% and 32.5% of gross premiums earned during the years ended December 31, 2013
and 2012, respectively.

Net Premiums Earned for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $234,248 and $157,668, respectively, and reflect

the gross premiums earned less reinsurance costs as described above.

Net Premiums Written during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled $251,906 and $203,240, respectively. Net

premiums written represent the premiums charged on policies issued during a fiscal period less reinsurance costs.

The following is a reconciliation of our total Net Premiums Written to Net Premiums Earned for the years ended December 31,

2013 and 2012:

Net Premiums Written
Increase in Unearned Premiums

Net Premiums Earned

Years Ended
December 31,

2013
$251,906
(17,658)

2012
$203,240
(45,572)

$234,248

$157,668

Net Investment Income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1,469 and $980, respectively. The increase in

2013 is primarily due to higher returns on investments and lower operating losses related to certain of our real estate investments.

Policy Fee Income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $3,098 and $2,538, respectively, and reflects the

policy fee income we earn with respect to our issuance of renewal policies.

Other Income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $2,193 and $1,424, respectively. The increase in other

income in 2013 is primarily due to the recognition of income related to the Aon Benfield settlement.

Table of Contents

Expenses

Our Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses amounted to $65,123 and $66,310, respectively, during the years ended

December 31, 2013 and 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we experienced favorable development of $2,456 with
respect to our net unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses established as of December 31, 2012, which contributed to the overall
favorable variance of $1,187 with respect to the total losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in 2013 as compared with 2012.
In addition, our losses and loss adjustment expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 included approximately $3,500 related
to claims from Tropical Storm Debby and Tropical Storm Isaac, which occurred in June and August 2012, respectively. See “Reserves
for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses” under “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.”

Policy Acquisition and Other Underwriting Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $31,619 and

$25,930, respectively, and primarily reflect the amortization of deferred acquisition costs, commissions payable to agents for
production and renewal of policies, and premium taxes, marketing costs and policy fees. The increase in 2013 is primarily attributable
to an increase in commissions and premium taxes related to the increase in policy renewals in 2013, the effect of which is offset by a
one-time charge of $1,210 in 2012 resulting from a change in accounting standards with respect to deferred acquisition costs.

Interest Expense totaled $3,607 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and relates to the two debt offerings we completed
during 2013. See Note 10 — “Long-Term Debt” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

Other Operating Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $34,286 and $21,084, respectively. The

$13,202 increase is primarily attributable to a $9,296 increase in compensation and related expenses of which $7,183 relates to an
increase in stock-based compensation and cash bonus expense. The remaining increase of $3,906 relates to charitable contributions
of $1,066 and other administrative costs, which include a variety of professional service fees, corporate insurances, information
system expense, and other general expenses of $2,840. As of December 31, 2013, we had 177 employees located at our offices in
Florida compared with 145 employees as of December 31, 2012. We also had 67 employees located in Noida, India at December 31,
2013 versus 62 at December 31, 2012.

Income Tax Expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $40,891 and $19,423, respectively, for state,

federal and foreign income taxes resulting in an effective tax rate of 38.4% for 2013 and 39.2% for 2012.

Table of Contents

Ratios:

The loss ratio applicable to the year ended December 31, 2013 (losses and loss adjustment expenses related to net premiums

earned) was 27.8% compared with 42.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our loss ratio was positively impacted by a
significant increase in our net premiums earned during 2013 combined with favorable development in claim trends for frequency and
severity and favorable development of reserves for prior accident years (see Gross Premiums Earned and Losses and Loss
Adjustment Expenses above).

The expense ratio applicable to the year ended December 31, 2013 (defined as underwriting expenses, interest and other
operating expenses related to net premiums earned) was 29.7% compared with 29.9% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The combined loss and expense ratio (total of all expenses related to net premiums earned) is the key measure of underwriting

performance traditionally used in the property and casualty industry. A combined ratio under 100% generally reflects profitable
underwriting results. A combined ratio over 100% generally reflects unprofitable underwriting results. Our combined ratio for the year
ended December 31, 2013 was 57.5% compared with 72.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our combined ratio was
positively impacted by a significant increase in our net premiums earned during 2013 (see Gross Premiums Earned above) and, also,
by continued favorable trends in 2013 related to our losses and loss adjustment expenses.

Due to the impact our reinsurance costs have on net premiums earned from period to period, our management believes the

combined loss and expense ratio measured to gross premiums earned is more relevant in assessing overall performance. The
combined loss and expense ratio to gross premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 39.9% compared with
48.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2012 to the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 reflect income available to common stockholders of $29,835, or
$3.02 earnings per diluted common share, compared with income available to common stockholders of $9,149, or $1.34 earnings per
diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our results for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 include
bargain purchase gains on acquisitions of $179 ($110 net of tax) and $936 ($575 net of tax), respectively, or $0.01 and $0.08 diluted
earnings per common share, respectively.

Revenue

Gross Premiums Earned for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $233,607 and reflect the revenue from policies acquired
from HomeWise in November 2011 and policies originally assumed from Citizens and subsequent renewals, including approximately
60,000 policies assumed in November 2012. Gross premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $143,606 and
principally reflect the revenue from policies assumed from Citizens and subsequent renewals.

Table of Contents

Premiums Ceded for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $75,939 and $55,525, respectively. Our premiums
ceded represent amounts paid to reinsurers to cover losses from catastrophes that exceed the thresholds defined by our catastrophe
excess of loss reinsurance treaties. Our reinsurance rates are based primarily on policy exposures reflected in gross premiums
earned. Premiums ceded were 32.5% and 38.7% of gross premiums earned during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011,
respectively. The percentage decrease in 2012 is primarily due to lower costs during the first five months of 2012 related to policies
assumed from HomeWise, which were subject to minimal reinsurance premiums. In addition, we had approximately two months of
earned premium in 2012 related to the November 2012 Citizens assumption with no associated increase in reinsurance premium.

Net Premiums Earned for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $157,668 and $88,081, respectively, and reflect

the gross premiums earned less reinsurance costs as described above.

Net Premiums Written during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $203,240 and $131,724, respectively. Net

premiums written represent the premiums charged on policies issued during a fiscal period less reinsurance costs.

The following is a reconciliation of our total Net Premiums Written to Net Premiums Earned for the years ended December 31,

2012 and 2011:

Net Premiums Written
Increase in Unearned Premiums

Net Premiums Earned

Years Ended
December 31,

2012
$203,240
(45,572)

2011
$131,724
(43,643)

$157,668

$ 88,081

Net Investment Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $980 and $2,061, respectively. The decline in

2012 is primarily due to operating losses incurred with respect to certain operations of our real estate investments.

Policy Fee Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $2,538 and $1,438, respectively, and reflects the

policy fee income we earn with respect to our issuance of renewal policies.

Gain on Bargain Purchase was $179 ($110 net of tax), or $0.01 diluted earnings per common share, and $936 ($575 net of tax),
or $0.08 diluted earnings per common share, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The bargain purchase
gains relate to our business acquisitions completed in April 2012 and in April 2011. See Note 6 — “Business Acquisitions” to our
consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Other Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,424 and $1,003, respectively. The increase in other
income in 2012 is primarily due to policy payment plan fees, which are the fees paid by policyholders who elect to pay premiums in
installments.

Table of Contents

Expenses

Our Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses amounted to $66,310 and $48,243, respectively, during the years ended

December 31, 2012 and 2011. Our losses for the year ended December 31, 2012 include approximately $1,417 and $2,090 related to
case reported claims from Tropical Storm Debby and Tropical Storm Isaac, respectively, which occurred in June and August 2012.
See “Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses” under “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.”

Policy Acquisition and Other Underwriting Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $25,930 and

$18,129, respectively, and primarily reflect the amortization of deferred acquisition costs, commissions payable to agents for
production and renewal of policies, and premium taxes and policy fees. The $7,801 increase in 2012 is primarily attributable to an
increase in our commissions and premium taxes for policy renewals combined with the one-time, $1,210 adjustment specific to our
adoption in January 2012 of the accounting standard update related to deferred acquisition costs.

Other Operating Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $21,084 and $11,032, respectively. The

$10,052 increase is primarily attributable to a $7,412 increase in compensation and related expenses of which $2,378 relates to an
increase in stock-based compensation and cash bonus expense. The remaining increase of $2,640 relates to our other administrative
costs, which include a variety of professional service fees, license fees, corporate insurances, lease expense, information system
expense, and other general expenses. Our 2012 compensation and related expenses include a full year of payroll expense related to
our India operations (acquired in November 2011) and to the employees hired in late 2011 to service policies acquired from
HomeWise. As of December 31, 2012, we had 145 employees located at our headquarters in Tampa, Florida compared with 119
employees as of December 31, 2011. We also had 62 employees located in Noida, India at December 31, 2012 versus 68 at
December 31, 2011.

Income Tax Expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $19,423 and $6,441, respectively, for state,

federal and foreign income taxes resulting in an effective tax rate of 39.2% for 2012 and 39.3% for 2011.

Ratios:

The loss ratio applicable to the year ended December 31, 2012 was 42.1% compared with 54.8% for the year ended

December 31, 2011. Our loss ratio was positively impacted by a significant increase in our gross premiums earned during 2012 (see
Gross Premiums Earned above).

The expense ratio applicable to the year ended December 31, 2012 was 29.9% compared with 33.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2011. The decrease in our expense ratio is attributable to the significant increase in our gross premiums earned as we
experienced an increase in other operating expenses during 2012 (see Other Operating Expenses above).

Our combined ratio for the year ended December 31, 2012 was 72.0% compared with 87.9% for the year ended December 31,

2011.

Table of Contents

Our combined loss and expense ratio to gross premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2012 was 48.6% compared

with 53.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Seasonality of Our Business

Our insurance business is seasonal as hurricanes and tropical storms typically occur during the period from June 1 through
November 30 each year. With our reinsurance treaty year effective on June 1 each year, any variation in the cost of our reinsurance,
whether due to changes in reinsurance rates or changes in the total insured value of our policy base, will occur and be reflected in
our financial results beginning June 1 each year.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Over the years, our liquidity requirements have been met through issuance of our common and preferred stock, debt offerings

and funds from operations. We expect our future liquidity requirements will be met by funds from operations, primarily the cash
received by insurance subsidiaries from premiums written and investment income. We may consider raising additional capital through
debt and equity offerings to support our growth and future investment opportunities.

HCPCI requires liquidity and adequate capital to meet ongoing obligations to policyholders and claimants and to fund operating

expenses. In addition, we attempt to maintain adequate levels of liquidity and surplus to manage any differences between the
duration of our liabilities and invested assets. In the insurance industry, cash collected for premiums from policies written is invested,
interest and dividends are earned thereon, and losses and loss adjustment expenses are paid out over a period of years. This period
of time varies by the circumstances surrounding each claim. A substantial portion of our losses and loss adjustment expenses are
fully settled and paid within 90 days of the claim receipt date. Additional cash outflow occurs through payments of underwriting costs
such as commissions, taxes, payroll, and general overhead expenses.

We believe that we maintain sufficient liquidity to pay HCPCI’s claims and expenses, as well as to satisfy commitments in the

event of unforeseen events such as reinsurer insolvencies, inadequate premium rates, or reserve deficiencies. We maintain a
comprehensive reinsurance program at levels management considers adequate to diversify risk and safeguard our financial position.

In the future, we anticipate our primary use of funds will be to pay claims, reinsurance premiums and interest, and also to fund

operating expenses.

Common Stock

In 2012, we sold an aggregate of 1,840,000 shares of our common stock for net proceeds of $20,082 after underwriting
commissions and offering expenses. See Note 15 — “Stockholders’ Equity” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Preferred Stock

In 2011, a total of 1,247,700 shares of our Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock were sold for net proceeds of $11,307
after offering costs. See Note 15 — “Stockholders’ Equity” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

Senior Notes

In January 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of approximately $40,250 of our 8.00% Senior Notes due 2020. In
December 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of $103,000 of our 3.875% senior convertible notes due 2019. See Note 10
— “Long-term debt” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cash Flows

Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are

summarized below.

Cash Flows for the Year ended December 31, 2013

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $55,472, which consisted primarily of cash

received from net written premiums less cash disbursed for operating expenses, reinsurance premiums and losses and loss
adjustment expenses. Net cash used in investing activities of $90,040 was primarily due to the purchases of available-for-sale
securities of $94,215, the purchase of $3,433 in property and equipment and the purchase of $565 in other investments offset by
redemptions and repayments of fixed-maturity securities of $3,607, and the proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities of
$4,558. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $97,752, which was primarily due to $143,250 from the issuance of long-term
debt offset by $4,770 of related underwriting and issuance costs, $10,902 of cash dividend payments, and $30,886 of payments to
repurchase common stock.

Cash Flows for the Year ended December 31, 2012

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $106,266, which consisted primarily of
cash received from net written premiums less cash disbursed for operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses. Net
cash used in investing activities amounted to $1,211 and was primarily due to $8,157 used to complete our business acquisitions in
2012, $16,538 used for the purchases of fixed-maturity and equity securities, and $2,796 used for the purchases of property,
equipment and other investments offset by $10,726 from the proceeds from sales of fixed-maturity and equity securities, $3,127 of
proceeds from calls, repayments, and maturities of fixed-maturity securities and $12,427 from time deposit redemptions. Net cash
provided by financing activities totaled $24,799, which was primarily due to $20,082 from the issuance of common stock, $12,152
related to the exercise of stock options and warrants and $1,161 excess tax benefit from stock options exercised offset by $8,561 in
cash dividends paid.

Table of Contents

Cash Flows for the Year ended December 31, 2011

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $56,033, which consisted primarily of cash
received from net written premiums less cash disbursed for operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses. Net cash
used in investing activities of $16,951 was primarily due to $5,309 used for our business acquisitions completed in 2011, $3,349 used
for the purchase of property and equipment, and $37,795 used for the purchases of fixed-maturity and equity securities offset by
$26,569 from the proceeds from sales of fixed-maturity and equity securities, $1,327 from the proceeds from calls, repayments,
maturities of fixed-maturity securities, and $1,606 from time deposit redemptions. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled
$6,424, which was primarily due to $11,307 from the issuance of preferred stock and $829 related to the exercise of stock options
offset by $3,825 in cash dividends paid and $1,887 used to repurchase our common shares.

Investments

The main objective of our investment policy is to maximize our after-tax investment income with a minimum of risk given the

current financial market. Our excess cash is invested primarily in money market accounts and available-for-sale investments.

At December 31, 2013, we had $129,800 of available-for-sale investments, which are carried at fair value. Changes in the

general interest rate environment affect the returns available on new fixed-maturity investments. While a rising interest rate
environment enhances the returns available on new investments, it reduces the market value of existing fixed-maturity investments
and thus the availability of gains on disposition. A decline in interest rates reduces the returns available on new fixed-maturity
investments but increases the market value of existing fixed-maturity investments, creating the opportunity for realized investment
gains on disposition.

With the exception of large national banks, it is our current practice not to maintain cash deposits of more than an aggregate of
$5,500 in any one bank at any time. From time to time, we may have in excess of $5,500 of cash designated for investment and on
deposit at a single national brokerage firm. In the future, we may alter our investment policy to include or increase investments in
federal, state and municipal obligations, preferred and common equity securities, real estate and real estate mortgages. The types of
investments held by HCPCI and HCA are limited by insurance law and regulations.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation

S-K.

Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013:

Payment Due by Period (in thousands)

Operating lease (1)
Service agreement (1)
Long-term debt obligations (2)

Total

1,093 $
197
184,385

Less than
1 Year

More than
5 Years
461
83
6,269 14,423 14,422 149,271

1-3 Years 3-5 Years
246 $
44

114 $
21

272 $
49

$185,675 $ 6,404 $14,713 $14,743 $149,815

(1) Represents the lease and maintenance service agreement for office space in Noida, India. Liabilities were converted from India

Rupee to U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2013 exchange rate.

(2) Amounts represent principal and interest payments over the life of the debts. See Note 10 — “Long-Term Debt” to our

consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the

United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments
to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in our financial statements. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near term are related to our losses and loss adjustment expenses, which include amounts estimated for
claims incurred but not yet reported. We base our estimates on various assumptions and actuarial data we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

We believe our accounting policies specific to losses and loss adjustment expenses, reinsurance with retrospective provisions,

deferred income taxes, and stock-based compensation expense involve our most significant judgments and estimates material to our
consolidated financial statements.

Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. We establish Reserves for the estimated total unpaid costs of losses
including LAE. Reserves reflect management’s best estimate of the total cost of (i) claims that have been incurred, but not yet paid,
and (ii) claims that have been incurred but not yet reported. Reserves established by us are not an exact calculation of our liability.
Rather, loss reserves represent management’s best estimate of our company’s liability based on the application of actuarial
techniques and other projection methodology and taking into consideration other facts and circumstances known at the balance sheet
date. The process of establishing loss reserves is complex and inherently imprecise, as it involves using judgment that is affected by
many variables such as past loss experience, current claim trends and the prevailing social, economic and legal environments. The
impact of both internal and external variables on ultimate losses and LAE costs is difficult to estimate. Our exposure is impacted by
both the risk characteristics of the physical locations where we write policies, such as hurricane and tropical storm-related risks, as
well as risks associated with varying social, judicial and legislative characteristics in the states in which we operate. In determining
loss reserves, we give careful consideration to all available data and actuarial analyses, and this process involves significant
judgment.

Table of Contents

Reserves represent estimates of the ultimate unpaid cost of all losses incurred, including losses for claims that have not yet been

reported to our insurance company. The amount of loss reserves for reported claims is based primarily upon a case-by-case
evaluation of the kind of risk involved, knowledge of the circumstances surrounding each claim and the insurance policy provisions
relating to the type of loss. The amounts of Reserves for unreported claims and LAE are determined using historical homeowners
insurance information as adjusted to current conditions. Inflation is ordinarily implicitly provided for in the reserving function through
analysis of costs, trends and reviews of historical reserving results over multiple years.

Reserves are closely monitored and are recalculated periodically using the most recent information on reported claims and a
variety of actuarial techniques. Specifically, claims management personnel complete weekly and ongoing reviews of existing case
reserves, new claims, changes to existing case reserves, and paid losses with respect to the current and prior years. As we develop
historical data regarding paid and incurred losses, we use this data to develop expected ultimate loss and loss adjustment expense
ratios. We then apply these expected loss and loss adjustment expense ratios to earned premium to derive a reserve level for our
homeowners line of business. In connection with the determination of these reserves, we will also consider other specific factors such
as recent weather-related losses, trends in historical paid losses, and legal and judicial trends regarding liability. Most of our
business was assumed from Citizens and HomeWise. Therefore, we use the loss ratio method, among other methods, to project an
ultimate loss expectation, and then the related loss history must be regularly evaluated and loss expectations updated, with the
possibility of variability from the initial estimate of ultimate losses.

When a claim is reported to us, our claims personnel establish a “case reserve” for the estimated amount of the ultimate
payment. This estimate reflects an informed judgment based upon general insurance reserving practices and on the experience and
knowledge of the estimator. The individual estimating the reserve considers the nature and value of the specific claim, the severity of
injury or damage, location, and the policy provisions relating to the type of loss. Case reserves are adjusted by us as more
information becomes available. It is our policy to settle each claim as expeditiously as possible.

We maintain IBNR Reserves to provide for claims that have been incurred but have not been reported and subsequent

development on reported claims. The IBNR reserve is determined by estimating our insurance company’s ultimate net liability for both
reported and unreported claims and then subtracting the case reserves and payments made to date for reported claims.

Loss Reserve Estimation Methods. We apply the following general methods in projecting loss and LAE reserves:

•

Reported loss development;

Paid loss development;

Loss ratio method; and

Average outstanding and open claims.

The results of the reserve calculations using these methods were similar, and therefore, we relied on an average of the four

methods.

Table of Contents

Description of Ultimate Loss Estimation Methods. The reported loss development method relies on the assumption that, at any

given state of maturity, ultimate losses can be predicted by multiplying cumulative reported losses (paid losses plus case reserves) by
a cumulative development factor. The validity of the results of this method depends on the stability of claim reporting and settlement
rates, as well as the consistency of case reserve levels. Case reserves do not have to be adequately stated for this method to be
effective; they only need to have a fairly consistent level of adequacy at all stages of maturity. Because of our limited loss experience,
we select loss development factors based on industry data found in current A.M. Best’s Aggregates and Averages –
Property/Casualty – United States & Canada. We assume that our loss development patterns will be reasonably consistent with
industry averages, and use the selected factors to assist in the projection of the ultimate losses.

The paid loss development method is mechanically identical to the reported loss development method described above. The

paid method does not rely on case reserves or claim reporting patterns in making projections.

The validity of the results from using a loss development approach can be affected by many conditions, such as internal claim

department processing changes, a shift between single and multiple claim payments, legal changes, or variations in our mix of
business from year to year. Also, since the percentage of losses paid for immature years is often low, development factors are
volatile. A small variation in the number of claims paid can have a leveraging effect that can lead to significant changes in estimated
ultimate losses. Therefore, ultimate values for immature loss years are often based on alternative estimation techniques.

The loss ratio method used by us relies on the assumption that remaining unreported losses are a function of the total expected
losses rather than a function of currently reported losses. The expected loss ratio is multiplied by earned premium to produce ultimate
losses. Reported incurred losses are then subtracted from this estimate to produce expected unreported losses.

The loss ratio method is most useful as an alternative to other models for immature loss years. For these immature years, the

amounts reported or paid may be small and unstable, and therefore, not predictive of future development. Therefore, future
development is assumed to follow an expected pattern that is supported by more stable historical data or by emerging trends. This
method is also useful when changing reporting patterns or payment patterns distort the historical development of losses.

Finally, we employ the average outstanding and open claims method. We segregate our claims according to when they were
incurred and conduct a detailed review in order to estimate average future development of open claims and average projected loss on
IBNR claims. We combine this estimate with our open claims in order to derive an estimate of expected unreported losses. Paid
losses are added to this estimate in order to derive an estimate of ultimate losses. This method is based on the assumption that
future unreported claims and the average severity of open claims and unreported claims can be reasonably estimated from the
experience available.

Table of Contents

While the property and casualty industry has incurred substantial aggregate losses from claims related to asbestos-related
illnesses, environmental remediation, product and mold, and other uncertain or environmental exposures, we have not experienced
significant losses from these types of claims.

Currently, our estimated ultimate liability is calculated monthly using these principles and procedures applicable to the lines of

business written. However, because the establishment of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process, we cannot be certain that
ultimate losses will not exceed the established loss reserves and have a material, adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition. Changes in estimates, or differences between estimates and amounts ultimately paid, are reflected in the
operating results of the period during which such adjustments are made.

Our reported results, financial position and liquidity would be affected by likely changes in key assumptions that determine our
net loss reserves. Management does not believe that any reasonably likely changes in the frequency of claims would affect our loss
reserves. However, management believes that a reasonably likely increase or decrease in the severity of claims could impact our net
loss reserves. The table below summarizes the effect on net loss reserves and equity in the event of reasonably likely changes in the
severity of claims considered in establishing loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. The range of reasonably likely changes in
the severity of our claims was established based on a review of changes in loss year development and applied to loss reserves as a
whole. The selected range of changes does not indicate what could be the potential best or worst case or likely scenarios:

Change in Reserves

-10.0%
-7.5%
-5.0%
-2.5%
Base
2.5%
5.0%
7.5%
10.0%

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Reserves
39,317
40,410
41,502
42,594
43,686
44,778
45,870
46,962
48,055

Percentage
change in
equity, net of tax
1.66%
1.25%
0.83%
0.42%
—
-0.42%
-0.83%
-1.25%
-1.66%

Economic Impact of Reinsurance Contracts with Retrospective Provisions. For the reinsurance treaty year June 1, 2013

through May 31, 2014, the total premium cost of the program to HCI is approximately $142,000 before broker fees. Certain of the
reinsurance agreements include retrospective provisions that adjust premiums, increase the amount of future coverage, or result in
profit commissions in the event losses are minimal or zero. As a result, we expect to recognize net reinsurance premiums ceded of
approximately $121,000 assuming no losses occur during that period. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
we will recognize an asset in the period in which the absence of loss experience gives rise to an increase in future coverage or
obligates the reinsurer to pay cash or other consideration under the contract. In the event that a loss arises, we will derecognize such
asset in the period in which a loss arises. Such adjustments to the asset, which accrue throughout the contract term, will negatively
impact our operating results when a catastrophic loss event occurs.

Table of Contents

There were no benefits recognized prior to 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we have accrued a benefit of $8,815

and deferred recognition of $3,706 in ceded premiums for a total reduction in 2013 ceded premiums of $12,521 in connection with
these agreements, an amount that would be charged to earnings in the event we experience a catastrophic loss that exceeds the
coverage retention limits provided under such agreements.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States

of America (“U.S. GAAP”), resulting in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense
reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or
excess of deductions over revenues. We determine deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this
method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets
and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur. Valuation allowances are
provided against assets that are not likely to be realized, if any. We have elected to classify interest and penalties, if any, as income
tax expense as permitted by current accounting standards.

Stock-Based Compensation. We account for our stock option and incentive plan under the fair value recognition provisions of

U.S. GAAP, which requires the measurement, and recognition of compensation for all stock-based awards made to employees and
directors including stock options and restricted stock issuances based on estimated fair values. We recognize stock-based
compensation in the consolidated statements of income on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. We use the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, which requires the following variables for input to calculate the fair value of each stock award on the option grant
date: 1) expected volatility of our stock price, 2) the risk-free interest rate, 3) expected term of each award, 4) expected dividends, and
5) an expected forfeiture rate. For restricted stock awards with market-based conditions, we estimate their fair values by using a
Monte Carlo simulation model, which requires for input the following variables: 1) expected dividends per share, 2) expected volatility,
3) risk-free interest rate, 4) estimated cost of capital, and 5) expected term of each award.

ITEM 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our investment portfolios at December 31, 2013 included fixed-maturity and equity securities, the purposes of which are not for

trading or speculation. Our main objective is to maximize after-tax investment income and maintain sufficient liquidity to meet
policyholder obligations while minimizing market risk, which is the potential economic loss from adverse fluctuations in securities
prices. We consider many factors including credit ratings, investment concentrations, regulatory requirements, anticipated fluctuation
of interest rates, durations and market conditions in developing investment strategies. Investment securities are managed by
investment companies and are overseen by the investment committee appointed by our board of directors.

Table of Contents

Our investment portfolios are primarily exposed to interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk. Fiscal and economic
uncertainties caused by any government shutdown, as well as debt ceiling and spending cut debates in Washington may exacerbate
these risks and potentially have adverse impacts on the securities markets as well as the value of our investment portfolios.

We classify our fixed-maturity and equity securities as available-for-sale and report any unrealized gains or losses, net of
deferred income taxes, as a component of other comprehensive income within our stockholders’ equity. As such, any material
temporary changes in their fair value can adversely impact the carrying value of our stockholders’ equity.

Interest Rate Risk

Our fixed-maturity securities are sensitive to potential losses resulting from unfavorable changes in interest rates. We manage

the risk by analyzing anticipated movement in interest rates and considering our future capital needs.

The following table illustrates the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates to the fair value of our fixed-maturity securities

at December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

Hypothetical Change in Interest Rates
300 basis point increase
200 basis point increase
100 basis point increase
100 basis point decrease
200 basis point decrease
300 basis point decrease

Credit Risk

Change
in
Estimated
Fair Value
$(17,183)
(11,457)
(5,729)
5,655
11,110
15,802

Percentage
Increase
(Decrease) in
Estimated
Fair Value

(15.32)%
(10.22)%
(5.11)%
5.04%
9.91%
14.09%

Estimated
Fair Value
$ 94,968
100,694
106,422
117,806
123,261
127,953

Credit risk can expose us to potential losses arising principally from adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuers of
our fixed-maturity securities. We mitigate the risk by investing in fixed-maturity securities that are generally investment grade and by
diversifying our investment portfolio to avoid concentrations in any single issuer or business sector.

The following table presents the composition of our fixed-maturity securities, by rating, at December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

Comparable Rating
AAA
AA1, AA2, AA3
A1, A2, A3
BBB1, BBB2, BBB3
BB1, BB2

Total

% of
Total
Amortized
Cost

12
20
40
25
3

Estimated
Fair Value
$ 13,187
22,857
44,777
27,480
3,850

% of
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
12
20
40
25
3

100

$112,151

100

Amortized
Cost

$ 12,812
22,583
44,394
27,131
3,818

$110,738

Table of Contents

Equity Price Risk

Our equity investment portfolio at December 31, 2013 included common stocks, perpetual preferred stocks, mutual funds and

exchange traded funds (“ETF”). We may incur potential losses due to adverse changes in equity security prices. We manage the risk
primarily through industry and issuer diversification and asset allocation techniques.

The following table illustrates the composition of our equity securities at December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

Stocks by sector:
Financial
Energy
Consumer
Other (1)

Mutual funds and ETF by type:

Debt
Equity

Total

Estimated
Fair Value

$ 7,950
1,506
1,042
522

11,020

6,262
367

6,629

% of Total
Estimated
Fair Value

45
9
6
2

35
3

$ 17,649

100

(1) Represents an aggregate of less than 5% sectors.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

At December 31, 2013, we did not have any material exposure to foreign currency related risk.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:

Reports of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting firm
Report of Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA, Independent Registered Public Accounting firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

Page

48-49
50
51
52
53
54-56
57-58
59-100

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders of
HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-
Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our
report dated March 12, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

Clearwater, Florida
March 12, 2014

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,

2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the

reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.

In our opinion, HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial

reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),

the consolidated financial statements of HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, and our
report dated March 12, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

Clearwater, Florida
March 12, 2014

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders
HCI Group, Inc.
Tampa, Florida:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Company at December 31, 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations, its comprehensive income
and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.

/s/ Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA

HACKER, JOHNSON & SMITH PA
Tampa, Florida
March 12, 2014

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

Fixed-maturity securities, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: $110,738 and $33,436,

respectively)

Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost: $17,248 and $8,756, respectively)
Other investments

Assets

Total investments
Cash and cash equivalents
Accrued interest and dividends receivable
Premiums receivable
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
Deferred policy acquisition costs
Property and equipment, net
Deferred income taxes, net
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Unearned premiums
Advance premiums
Assumed reinsurance balances payable
Accrued expenses
Dividends payable
Income taxes payable
Deferred income taxes, net
Long-term debt
Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
Stockholders’ equity:

7% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock (liquidation preference $10.00 per share), no par
value, 1,500,000 shares authorized, 110,684 and 241,182 shares issued and outstanding in 2013
and 2012, respectively

Series B junior participating preferred stock (no par value, 400,000 shares authorized, no shares

issued or outstanding)

Preferred stock (no par value, 18,100,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding)
Common stock (no par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 10,939,268 and 10,877,537 shares

issued and outstanding in 2013 and 2012, respectively)

Additional paid-in capital
Retained income
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

December 31,

2013

2012

$112,151 $ 35,953
8,876
16,087

17,649
16,228

146,028
293,398
1,133
14,674
28,066
14,071
13,132
—
15,814

60,916
230,214
375
10,642
9,112
10,032
10,853
3,848
2,296

$526,316 $338,288

$ 43,686 $ 41,168
154,249
4,029
1,377
3,041
42
8,813
—
—
4,316

171,907
4,504
4,660
4,032
19
543
2,740
126,932
6,772

365,795

217,035

—

—
—

—
48,966
110,441
1,114

—
63,875
55,758
1,620

160,521

121,253

$526,316 $338,288

Years Ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

$ 337,113 $233,607 $143,606
(55,525)

(102,865)

(75,939)

234,248
1,469
3,098
80
—
2,193

157,668
980
2,538
276
179
1,424

88,081
2,061
1,438
290
936
1,003

241,088

163,065

93,809

65,123
31,619
3,607
—
34,286

66,310
25,930
—
161
21,084

48,243
18,129
—
—
11,032

134,635

113,485

77,404

106,453
40,891

49,580
19,423

16,405
6,441

$ 65,562 $ 30,157 $

(104)

(322)

9,964
(815)

$ 65,458 $ 29,835 $

9,149

5.82 $

3.45 $

5.63 $

3.02 $

0.95 $

0.88 $

1.49

1.34

0.53

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Table of Contents

Revenue
Gross premiums earned
Premiums ceded

Net premiums earned
Net investment income
Policy fee income
Net realized investment gains
Gain on bargain purchase
Other

Total revenue

Expenses
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
Interest expense
Goodwill impairment loss
Other operating expenses

Total expenses

Income before income taxes
Income tax expense

Net income
Preferred stock dividends

Income available to common stockholders

Basic earnings per common share

Diluted earnings per common share

Dividends per common share

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Amounts in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,

2013

2011
$65,562 $30,157 $ 9,964

2012

(767)
24
(80)

(823)
317

2,571
3
(276)

2,298
(886)

(506)

1,412

674
23
(290)

407
(157)

250

$65,056 $31,569 $10,214

Net income

Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on investments:
Unrealized (loss) gain arising during the period
Call and repayment losses charged to investment income
Reclassification adjustment for realized (loss) gain

Net change in unrealized (loss) gain
Deferred income taxes on above change

Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes

Comprehensive income

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Balance at December 31,

2012
Net income
Total other

comprehensive loss,
net of income taxes
Conversion of preferred

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

Additional

Series A Preferred Stock
Amount

Common Stock

Amount Capital

Paid-In Retained
Income

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income, Net
of Tax

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

241,182 $ — 10,877,537 $ — $ 63,875 $ 55,758 $
— 65,562

— —

—

1,620 $
—

121,253
65,562

—

— —

—

(506)

stock to common stock

(130,498)

—

130,498 —

—

612,000 —

—

(29,670) —

—

Issuance of restricted

stock

Forfeiture of restricted

stock

Repurchase and

retirement of common
stock

Repurchase of common
stock under prepaid
forward contract
Equity component on
3.875% convertible
senior notes (net of
offering costs of $557)

Deferred taxes on debt

discount

Common stock dividends
Preferred stock dividends
Tax benefits on stock-
based compensation

Stock-based

compensation

Balance at December 31,

—

(28,346) —

(963)

—

(963)

—

(622,751) — (29,923)

—

(29,923)

—

— — 15,900

—

15,900

—
—
—

— —
— —
— —

(6,348)

—
— (10,775)
(104)
—

—
—
—

(6,348)
(10,775)
(104)

—

— —

1,060

—

1,060

—

— —

5,365

—

5,365

2013

110,684 $ — 10,939,268 $ — $ 48,966 $110,441 $

1,114 $

160,521

Table of Contents

Balance at December 31,

2011
Net income
Total other

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity – (Continued)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

Additional

Series A Preferred Stock
Amount

Common Stock

Amount Capital

Paid-In Retained
Income

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive,
Net of
Tax

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

1,247,700 $ — 6,202,485 $ — $ 29,636 $33,986 $
— 30,157

— —

208 $
—

63,830
30,157

comprehensive income,
net of income taxes
Exercise of common stock

— —

1,412

options

— —

340,000 —

283 —

—

283

Shares surrendered upon
exercising common
stock options

Exercise of common stock

warrants

Excess tax benefit from

— —

(72,592) —

— —

—

— — 1,314,806 — 11,869 —

—

11,869

stock options exercised

— —

1,161 —

—

1,161

Conversion of preferred

stock to common stock (1,006,518) — 1,006,518 —

— —

—

— —

246,320 —

— —

—

— — 1,840,000 — 20,082 —
— (8,063)
— —
— —
(322)
—
— —
— —

—
—
—

20,082
(8,063)
(322)

compensation

— —

844 —

—

844

Balance at December 31,

2012

241,182 $ — 10,877,537 $ — $ 63,875 $55,758 $

1,620 $

121,253

Issuance of restricted

stock

Issuance of common

stock (net of offering
costs of $220)

Common stock dividends
Preferred stock dividends
Stock-based

Table of Contents

Balance at December 31,

2010
Net income
Total other comprehensive
income, net of income
taxes

Proceeds from sale of

preferred stock (net of
offering costs of $1,170)
Exercise of common stock

options

Shares surrendered upon

exercising common stock
options

Excess tax benefit from

stock options exercised
Common stock dividends
Preferred stock dividends
Repurchase and retirement

of common stock
Warrants issued in
connection with
assumption transaction

Stock-based compensation

Balance at December 31,

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity – (Continued)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

Additional

Series A Preferred Stock
Amount

Common Stock

Amount Capital

Paid-In Retained
Income

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income, Net
of Tax

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

— $ — 6,205,396 $ — $ 18,606 $28,065 $
— 9,964
— —
— —

(42) $
—

46,629
9,964

— —

250

1,247,700 —

— — 11,307 —

—

11,307

— — 255,200 —

564 —

—

564

— —

(9,317) —

— —

—

— —
— —
— —

265 —
— (3,229)
(814)
—

—
—
—

265
(3,229)
(814)

— — (248,794) —

(1,887) —

—

(1,887)

— —
— —

754 —
27 —

—
—

754
27

2011

1,247,700 $ — 6,202,485 $ — $ 29,636 $33,986 $

208 $

63,830

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amounts in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Stock-based compensation
Net amortization of discounts and premiums on investments in fixed-maturity

securities

Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Net realized investment gains
Gain on bargain purchase
Goodwill impairment loss
Loss on sale of other investment
Loss on disposal of other investment
Foreign currency remeasurement loss
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Premiums and reinsurance receivable
Advance premiums
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
Accrued interest and dividends receivable
Other assets
Assumed reinsurance balances payable
Deferred policy acquisition costs
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Unearned premiums
Income taxes payable
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

Years Ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

$ 65,562

$ 30,157

$ 9,964

5,365

844

336
2,103
557
(80)
—
—
20
6
69

279
1,591
(2,366)
(276)
(179)
161
—
—
23

195
576
(1,984)
(290)
(936)
—
—
—
—

(4,032)
475
(18,954)
(758)
(9,728)
3,283
(4,039)
2,518
17,658
(8,270)
3,381

3,267
1,897
5,057
33
(803)
1,377
2,289
13,744
45,572
3,857
(258)

(8,061)
1,018
3,618
(228)
82
—
(2,914)
5,278
43,643
4,646
1,399

Net cash provided by operating activities

55,472

106,266

56,033

Cash flows from investing activities:

Cash consideration paid for acquired business, net of cash acquired
Purchase of property and equipment, net
Purchase of other investments
Purchase of fixed-maturity securities
Purchase of equity securities
Proceeds from sales of fixed-maturity securities
Proceeds from calls, repayments and maturities of fixed-maturity securities
Proceeds from sales of equity securities
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
Proceeds from sales of other investment
Time deposits, net

Net cash used in investing activities

—
(3,433)
(565)
(82,907)
(11,308)
1,749
3,607
2,809
1
7
—

(90,040)

(8,157)
(1,196)
(1,600)
(10,128)
(6,410)
8,991
3,127
1,735
—
—
12,427

(5,309)
(3,144)
(205)
(31,170)
(6,625)
24,904
1,327
1,665
—
—
1,606

(1,211)

(16,951)

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock
Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock warrants
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
Cash dividends paid
Repurchases of common stock
Debt issuance costs
Tax benefits on stock-based compensation

Net cash provided by financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid for income taxes

Cash paid for interest

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

Unrealized (loss) gain on investments in available-for-sale securities, net of tax

Common stock warrants issued for outside services

Conversion of Series A preferred stock to common stock

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

—
—
—
—
143,250
(10,902)
(30,886)
(4,770)
1,060

20,082
—
283
11,869
—
(8,561)
—
(35)
1,161

97,752

24,799

—

—
11,307
564
—
—
(3,825)
(1,887)
—
265

6,424

—

63,184
230,214

129,859
100,355

45,506
54,849

$293,398 $230,214 $100,355

$ 47,435 $ 16,710 $

3,451

2,531 $

— $

—

(506) $

1,412 $

— $

1,170 $

9,121 $

250

754

—

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 1 — Nature of Operations

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HCI Group, Inc. (“HCI” or the “Company”), formerly known as
Homeowners Choice, Inc., include the accounts of HCI, Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
(“HCPCI”), HCI’s principal operating subsidiary, and certain other insurance and non-insurance subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Through its subsidiaries, the Company is primarily engaged in the property and casualty insurance business. HCPCI is
authorized to underwrite various homeowners’ property and casualty insurance products in the state of Florida. HCPCI’s operations
are supported by the following HCI subsidiaries:

•

Homeowners Choice Managers, Inc. (“HCM”) – acts as managing general agent and provides marketing, underwriting,

claims settlement, accounting and financial services to HCPCI;

•

Southern Administration, Inc. – provides policy administration services to HCPCI; and

Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company, Ltd. – participates in the reinsurance program to HCPCI.

As part of geographical expansion into other states, Homeowners Choice Assurance Company, Inc. (“HCA”) was organized to

enter the Alabama property and casualty insurance market. HCA was approved and licensed by the Alabama Department of
Insurance in August 2013. HCA did not commence underwriting during 2013.

In addition, while not material to the consolidated financial statements, HCI has various subsidiaries primarily engaged in the

businesses of owning and leasing real estate, operating marina facilities and one restaurant and developing software.

The Company reports its operations under one business segment.

The Company obtained a majority of its policies through participation in a “take-out program” with Citizens Property Insurance

Corporation (“Citizens”), a Florida state supported insurer. Policies were obtained in ten separate assumption transactions with
Citizens that took place from July 2007 through November 2013. The Company is required to offer renewals on the policies acquired
for a period of three years subsequent to the initial expiration of the assumed policies. During the first full year after assumption, such
renewals are required to have rates that are equivalent to or less than the rates charged by Citizens. The Company’s premium
revenue since inception comes from these assumptions and one additional assumption from HomeWise Insurance Company
(“HomeWise”) in November 2011 through which the Company acquired the Florida policies of HomeWise.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles

generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Acquisition Accounting. The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method, which requires an

allocation of the purchase price of an acquired entity to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets
acquired. In the event the net assets acquired exceed the purchase price, the Company will recognize a gain on bargain purchase.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires

management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. Material estimates that are
particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term are primarily related to losses and loss adjustment expenses,
reinsurance with retrospective provisions, deferred income taxes, and stock-based compensation expense.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of less

than three months to be cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on
deposit with financial institutions and securities brokerage firms and also includes a $300 statutory deposit held by the State of Florida
for the benefit of all policyholders.

Investments. Investments consist of fixed-maturity and equity securities. Fixed-maturity securities include debt securities and

redeemable preferred stock. Securities may be classified as either trading, held to maturity or available-for-sale. The Company’s
available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. Temporary changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities are excluded
from net investment income and reported in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
deferred income taxes. Realized investment gains and losses from sales are recorded on the trade date and are determined using
the first-in first-out (FIFO) method. Investment income is recognized as earned and discounts or premiums arising from the purchase
of debt securities are recognized in investment income using the interest method over the estimated remaining term of the security.
Gains and losses from call redemptions and repayments are charged to investment income.

The Company reviews all securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis and more frequently

when economic or market conditions warrant such review. When the fair value of any investment is lower than its cost, an
assessment is made to determine whether the decline is temporary or other-than-temporary. If the decline is determined to be other-
than-temporary, the investment is written down to fair value and an impairment charge is recognized in income in the period in which
the Company makes such determination. For a debt security that the Company does not

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

intend to sell nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell before recovery of its amortized cost, only the
credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in income, while the impairment related to all other factors is recognized in
other comprehensive income. The Company considers various factors in determining whether an individual security is other-than-
temporarily impaired (see Note 4 — “Investments”).

Other investments consist primarily of real estate and the related assets purchased for investment purposes (see Note 4 —

“Investments” and Note 6 — “Business Acquisitions”). Real estate and the related depreciable assets are carried at cost, net of
accumulated depreciation, which is included in net investment income and allocated over the estimated useful life of the asset using
the straight-line method of depreciation. Real estate is evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying
value of the real estate may not be recoverable.

Deferred policy acquisition costs. Deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) primarily represent commissions paid to outside

agents at the time of collection of the policy premium and premium taxes and are amortized over the life of the related policy in
relation to the amount of gross premiums earned.

The method followed in computing DAC limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value, which gives

effect to the gross premium earned, related investment income, unpaid losses and LAE and certain other costs expected to be
incurred as the premium is earned.

DAC is reviewed to determine if it is recoverable from future income, including investment income. If such costs are determined
to be unrecoverable, they are expensed at the time of determination. The amount of DAC considered recoverable could be reduced
in the near term if the estimates of total revenues discussed above are reduced or permanently impaired as a result of the disposition
of a line of business. The amount of amortization of DAC could be revised in the near term if any of the estimates discussed above
are revised.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, which is

included in other operating expenses. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives as follows:
building 39 years; computer hardware and software 3 years; office and furniture equipment 3 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the asset’s useful life. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized to the property
accounts. Replacements and maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as
incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment annually

or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The
Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the assets can be recovered from undiscounted
future cash flows. Recoverability of long-lived assets is dependent upon, among other things, the Company’s ability to maintain
profitability, so as to be able to meet its obligations when they become due. In the opinion of management, based upon current
information and projections, long-lived assets will be recovered over the period of benefit.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Long-Term Debt. Long-term debt is generally classified as a liability and carried at amortized cost, net of any discount. At
issuance, a debt instrument with embedded features such as conversion and redemption options is evaluated to determine whether
bifurcation and derivative accounting is applicable. If such instrument is not subject to derivative accounting, it is further evaluated to
determine if the Company is required to separately account for the liability and equity components.

To determine the carrying values of the liability and equity components at issuance, the Company measures the fair value of a

similar liability, including any embedded features other than the conversion option, and assigns such value to the liability component.
The liability component’s fair value is then subtracted from the initial proceeds to determine the carrying value of the debt instrument’s
equity component, which is included in additional paid-in capital.

Any embedded feature other than the conversion option is evaluated at issuance to determine if it is probable that such
embedded feature will be exercised. If the Company concludes that the exercisability of that embedded feature is not probable, the
embedded feature is considered to be nonsubstantive and would not impact the initial measurement and expected life of the debt
instrument’s liability component.

Transaction costs related to issuing a debt instrument that embodies both liability and equity components are allocated to the
liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of the proceeds and accounted for as debt issuance costs and equity
issuance costs, respectively. Debt issuance costs are recognized in other assets. Both debt discount and deferred debt issuance
costs are amortized to interest expense over the expected life of the debt instrument using the effective interest method. Equity
issuance costs are a reduction to the proceeds allocated to the equity component.

Prepaid Share Repurchase Forward Contract. A prepaid share repurchase forward contract is generally a contract that allows

the Company to buy from the counterparty a specified number of common shares at a specific time at a given forward price. The
Company entered into such a contract in December 2013 and evaluated the characteristics of the forward contract to determine
whether it met the definition of a derivative financial instrument pursuant to U.S. GAAP. The Company determined the forward
contract is an equity contract on the Company’s common shares requiring physical settlement in common shares of the Company. As
such, the transaction is recognized as a component of stockholders’ equity with a charge to additional paid-in capital equal to the
prepayment amount, which represents the cash paid to the counterparty. There will be no recognition in earnings for changes in fair
value in subsequent periods.

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. Reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) are determined by

establishing liabilities in amounts estimated to cover incurred losses and LAE. Such reserves are determined based on the
assessment of claims reported and the development of pending claims. These reserves are based on individual case estimates for
the reported losses and LAE and estimates of such amounts that are incurred but not reported. Changes in the estimated liability are
charged or credited to income as the losses and LAE are settled.

The estimates of unpaid losses and LAE are subject to trends in claim severity and frequency and are continually reviewed. As

part of the process, the Company reviews historical data and considers various factors, including known and anticipated regulatory
and legal developments, changes in social attitudes, inflation and economic conditions. As experience develops and other data
becomes available, these estimates are revised, as required, resulting in increases or decreases to the existing unpaid losses and
LAE. Adjustments are reflected in the results of operations in the period in which they are made and the liabilities may deviate
substantially from prior estimates.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Advance Premiums. Premium payments received prior to the policy effective date are recorded as advance premiums. Once

the policy is in force, the premiums are recorded as described under “Premium Revenue” below.

Reinsurance. In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to reduce the loss that may arise from catastrophes or
other events that cause unfavorable underwriting results by reinsuring certain levels of risk in various areas of exposure with other
insurance enterprises or reinsurers. The Company contracts with a number of reinsurers to secure its annual reinsurance coverage,
which generally becomes effective June 1st each year. The Company purchases reinsurance each year taking into consideration
probable maximum losses and reinsurance market conditions. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers would be estimated in a manner
consistent with the applicable reinsurance contract(s). Reinsurance premiums and reserves related to reinsured business are
accounted for on a basis consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance
contracts. Premiums ceded to other companies have been reported as a reduction of gross premiums earned. Prepaid reinsurance
premiums represent the unexpired portion of premiums ceded to reinsurers.

Certain of the Company’s current contracts contain retrospective provisions including terms and conditions that adjust premiums,

increase the amount of future coverage, or result in profit commissions based on the loss experience under the contracts. In such
cases, a with-and-without method is used to estimate the asset or liability amount to be recognized at each reporting date. The
amount of the estimate is the difference between the net contract costs before and after the loss experience under the contract.
Estimates related to premium adjustments, profit commissions and coverage changes are recognized in ceded premiums earned.
These estimates are reviewed monthly based on the loss experience to date and as adjustments become necessary. Such
adjustments are reflected in the Company’s current operations.

Premium Revenue. Premium revenue is earned on a daily pro-rata basis over the term of the policies and is included in gross

premiums earned. Unearned premiums represent the portion of the premium related to the unexpired policy term. The Company
reviews its policy detail and establishes an allowance for any amount outstanding for more than 90 days. As of December 31, 2013
and 2012, there was no allowance required.

Policy Fees. Policy fees represent nonrefundable fees for insurance coverage, which are intended to reimburse a portion of the

costs incurred to underwrite the policy. Effective October 1, 2013 on a prospective basis, policy fees are recognized ratably over the
policy coverage period. Prior to October 1, 2013, the fees were recognized in income when the policy was written on the basis that
the revenues were appropriately matched to the Company’s incremental direct costs related to policy underwriting.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Florida Insurance Guaranty Association Assessments. The Company may be assessed by the state guaranty association.

The assessments are intended to be used for the payment of covered claims of insolvent insurance entities. The assessments are
generally based on a percentage of premiums written during or following the year of insolvency. Liabilities are recognized when the
assessments are probable to be imposed on the premiums on which they are expected to be based and the amounts can be
reasonably estimated. The Company is permitted by Florida statutes to recover the entire amount of assessments from in-force and
future policyholders through policy surcharges. U.S. GAAP provides that the Company should record an asset based on the amount
of written or obligated-to-write premiums and limited to the amounts recoverable over the life of the in-force policies.

Foreign Currency. The functional currency of the Company’s Indian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. As such, the monetary assets

and liabilities of this subsidiary are remeasured into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date. Non-
monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured using historical rates. Expenses recorded in the local currency are remeasured at the
prevailing exchange rate. Exchange gains and losses resulting from these remeasurements are included in other operating expenses.

Income Taxes. The Company files consolidated federal and state income tax returns and allocates taxes among its wholly-

owned subsidiaries in accordance with a written tax-allocation agreement approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with U.S. GAAP, resulting in two components of income tax expense:

current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the
provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred
income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the
tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are
recognized in the period in which they occur.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets

are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon
examination. The term “more likely than not” means a likelihood of more than fifty percent; the terms “examined” and “upon
examination” also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-
than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than fifty
percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The
determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts,
circumstances, and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a
deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of December 31, 2013, management is not aware of any uncertain tax positions that would
have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The carrying amounts for the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate their

fair values at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Fair values for securities are based on the framework for measuring fair value
established by U.S. GAAP (see Note 5 — “Fair Value Measurements”).

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the fair value recognition
provisions of U.S. GAAP which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation for all stock-based awards made to
employees and directors including stock options and restricted stock issuances based on estimated fair values. In accordance with
U.S. GAAP, the fair value of stock-based awards is generally recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period,
which is defined as the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. The Company uses
a straight-line attribution method for all grants that include only a service condition. The Company’s restricted stock awards include
service, market and performance conditions. As a result, restricted stock grants with market condition are expensed over the derived
service period for each separately vesting tranche. For awards with performance conditions, the Company recognizes compensation
expense over the requisite service period when it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. Compensation
expense related to all awards is included in other operating expense.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income

attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. U.S. GAAP
requires the inclusion of restricted stock as participating securities since holders of the Company’s restricted stock have the right to
share in dividends, if declared, equally with common stockholders. During periods of net income, participating securities are allocated
a proportional share of net income determined by dividing total weighted-average participating securities by the sum of total weighted-
average common shares and participating securities (the “two-class method”). Diluted earnings per common share reflect the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted as well as
participating equities. Potentially dilutive securities at December 31, 2013 consisted of stock options, the 7.0% Series A cumulative
convertible preferred stock (see Note 15 — “Stockholders’ Equity”) and the 3.875% convertible senior notes (see Note 10 — “Long-
term debt”).

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02. In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting

Standards Update No. 2013-02 (“ASU 2013-02”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or
other comprehensive income in the financial statements. However, the amendments require an entity to provide information about the
amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present,
either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required to be
reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required that provide additional
detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for public entities for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 — Investments

The Company holds investments in fixed-maturity securities as well as equity securities, which are classified as available-for-

sale. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the
Company’s available-for-sale securities by security type were as follows:

As of December 31, 2013
Fixed-maturity securities
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions
Redeemable preferred stock

Total

Equity securities

Cost or
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gain

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

$
4,549
25,139
10,929
69,715
406

110,738
17,248

37
484
499
917
5

1,942
920

(22)
(219)
(96)
(181)
(11)

(529)
(519)

$
4,564
25,404
11,332
70,451
400

112,151
17,649

Total available-for-sale securities

$127,986

2,862

$ (1,048)

$129,800

As of December 31, 2012
Fixed-maturity securities
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions
Redeemable preferred stock

Total

Equity securities

1,359
$
10,298
10,708
10,152
919

33,436
8,756

88
572
936
914
18

2,528
303

—
(10)
—
—
(1)

(11)
(183)

1,447
$
10,860
11,644
11,066
936

35,953
8,876

Total available-for-sale securities

$ 42,192

2,831

(194)

$ 44,829

At December 31, 2013, fixed-maturity securities included $105 of U.S. Treasury securities, which represents a statutory deposit

held in trust with the Treasurer of Alabama.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or
without penalties. The scheduled contractual maturities of fixed-maturity securities at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

Available-for-sale
Due in one year or less
Due after one year through five years
Due after five years through ten years
Due after ten years
Commercial mortgage-backed securities

December 31,

2013

2012

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair
Value

Amortized
Cost

$
2,366
24,829
59,083
13,531
10,929

$
2,381
25,145
59,582
13,711
11,332

$ 1,258
8,387
8,045
5,038
10,708

Estimated
Fair
Value

$ 1,264
8,728
8,612
5,705
11,644

$110,738

$112,151

$ 33,436

$ 35,953

Proceeds received, and the gross realized gains and losses from sales of available-for-sale securities, for the years ended

December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2013
Fixed-maturity securities

Equity securities

Year ended December 31, 2012
Fixed-maturity securities

Equity securities

Year ended December 31, 2011
Fixed-maturity securities

Equity securities*

Gross
Realized

Proceeds

Gains

Gross
Realized
Losses

$ 1,749

$ 2,809

$ 8,991

$ 1,735

$ 24,904

$ 1,665

(4)

155

$ (163)

421

(6)

$ (230)

545

121

(96)

$ (280)

Amounts reported for the year ended December 31, 2011 include the gross realized gains and losses from equity option
contracts. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company entered into equity contracts for exchange-traded call and
put options to meet certain investment objectives. With respect to these option contracts, the Company received net proceeds of
$89 and realized gains of $49 during the year ended December 31, 2011. Such gains are included in the realized investment
gains in the Consolidated Statements of Income. There were no open option contracts at December 31, 2011 or in subsequent
years.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Other-than-temporary Impairment (“OTTI”)

The Company regularly reviews its individual investment securities for OTTI. The Company considers various factors in

determining whether each individual security is other-than-temporarily impaired, including:

•

the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events that may affect its operations or

income;

•

the length of time and the extent to which the market value of the security has been below its cost or amortized cost;

general market conditions and industry or sector specific factors;

nonpayment by the issuer of its contractually obligated interest and principal payments; and

the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of costs.

Securities with gross unrealized loss positions at December 31, 2013 and 2012, aggregated by investment category and length

of time the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows:

As of December 31, 2013
Fixed-maturity securities
U.S. treasury and U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions
Redeemable preferred stock

Total fixed-maturity securities
Equity securities

Less Than Twelve Months

Twelve Months or
Greater

Total

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

(22) $

(212)
(96)
(181)
(11)

(522)
(273)

3,291 $
9,502
2,179
20,233
239

35,444
10,742

— $ — $
230
—
—
—

(7)
—
—
—

(22) $ 3,291
9,732
2,179
20,233
239

(219)
(96)
(181)
(11)

(7)
(246)

230
1,069

(529)
(519)

35,674
11,811

Total available-for-sale securities

(795) $ 46,186 $

(253) $ 1,299 $ (1,048) $ 47,485

As of December 31, 2012
Fixed-maturity securities
Corporate bonds
Redeemable preferred stock

Total fixed-maturity securities
Equity securities

Less Than Twelve Months

Twelve Months or
Greater

Total

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Estimated
Fair
Value

(2) $
(1)

444 $
66

(3)
(136)

510
3,019

(8) $

—

(8)
(47)

981 $
—

(10) $ 1,425
66

(1)

981
201

(11)
(183)

1,491
3,220

Total available-for-sale securities

(139) $

3,529 $

(55) $ 1,182 $

(194) $ 4,711

The Company believes there were no fundamental issues such as credit losses or other factors with respect to any of its
available-for-sale securities. The unrealized losses on investments in fixed-maturity securities were caused by interest rate changes.
It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the par value of the investments. In determining whether
equity securities are

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

other than temporarily impaired, the Company considers its intent and ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow
for the recovery of cost. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates or market conditions and not
credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold its available-for-sale investments until a market price
recovery or maturity, the Company does not consider any of its investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31,
2013 and 2012.

Other Investments

Other investments consist primarily of the Company’s real estate portfolio and the related assets of the marina and restaurant
facilities acquired in 2012 and 2011. Operating activities related to the Company’s real estate investments include leasing of office and
retail space to tenants, wet and dry boat storage, a restaurant, and fuel services with respect to marina clients and recreational
boaters.

Other investments consist of the following as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Land
Land improvements
Building
Other

Total, at cost

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

Other investments

December 31,

2013
$11,299
1,351
3,022
1,262

16,934
(706)

2012
$10,993
1,326
2,869
1,238

16,426
(339)

$16,228

$16,087

Depreciation and amortization expense for other investments was $388 and $279, respectively, for the years ended

December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Net investment income (loss), by source, is summarized as follows:

Available-for-sale securities:
Fixed-maturity securities
Equity securities
Investment expense

Time deposits
Other investments
Cash and cash equivalents

Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

$ 1,868
499
(210)
—
(1,045)
357

$ 1,464
492
(150)
357
(1,334)
151

$1,339
247
(92)
538
(96)
125

$ 1,469

980

$2,061

At December 31, 2013, $241,378 or 82.3% of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were deposited at three national banks

and included $22,252 in two custodial accounts. At December 31, 2012, deposits at two national banks totaled $208,890,
representing 90.7% of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and included $22,957 in two custodial accounts.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 5 — Fair Value Measurements

The Company records and discloses certain financial assets at their estimated fair value but does not elect the fair value option

for its long-term debt. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three
broad levels as follows:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2 – Other inputs that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Inputs that are unobservable.

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of money-market funds. Their carrying value approximates fair value due to the

short maturity and high liquidity of these funds.

Available-for-sale securities:

Estimated fair values of the Company’s available-for-sale securities are determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, using
valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Fair values are
generally measured using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities or other inputs that are observable either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar securities. In those instances where observable inputs are not available, fair values are
measured using unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the security and are developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances. Fair value estimates derived from unobservable inputs are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including
the discount rates and the estimated amounts and timing of future cash flows. The derived fair value estimates cannot be
substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a
current market exchange.

The estimated fair values for securities that do not trade on a daily basis are determined by management, utilizing prices
obtained from an independent pricing service and information provided by brokers. Management reviews the assumptions and
methods utilized by the pricing service and then compares the relevant data and pricing to broker-provided data. The Company gains
assurance of the overall reasonableness and consistent application of the assumptions and methodologies and compliance with
accounting standards for fair value determination through ongoing monitoring of the reported fair values.

Long-term debt:

Long-term debt includes the Company’s 8% senior notes due 2020 and 3.875% convertible senior notes due 2019. The 8%
senior notes were initially sold to the public in January 2013 and trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The estimated fair value of
the 8% senior notes is based on the closing market price on December 31, 2013. The 3.875% convertible senior notes were sold in a
private offering completed December 30, 2013. The fair value of the 3.875% convertible senior notes is estimated using a discounted
cash flow method that relies on Level 3 inputs.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Assets Measured at Estimated Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

The following table presents information about the Company’s financial assets measured at estimated fair value on a recurring

basis and the estimated fair value of its long-term debt that is reflected in the financial statements at carrying value. The table
indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value as of December 31,
2013 and 2012:

As of December 31, 2013
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents

Fixed-maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Corporate bonds
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
State, municipalities, and political subdivisions
Redeemable preferred stock

Total fixed-maturity securities

Equity securities

Total available-for-sale securities

Total

Financial Liabilities:
Long-term debt:
8% Senior notes
3.875% Convertible senior notes

Total long-term debt

As of December 31, 2012
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents

Total fixed-maturity securities

Equity securities

Total available-for-sale securities

Total

Fair Value Measurements Using

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

$293,398 $ — $ — $293,398

3,520
24,476
—
—
400

1,044
928
11,332
70,451
—

—
—
—
—
—

4,564
25,404
11,332
70,451
400

28,396
17,649

83,755
—

—
—

112,151
17,649

46,045

83,755

—

129,800

$339,443 $83,755 $ — $423,198

— $43,390 $ — $ 43,390
86,630
—

86,630

—

— $43,390 $86,630 $130,020

Fair Value Measurements Using

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

$230,214

$ —

$230,214

583
10,860
—
11,066
936

23,445
8,876

864
—
11,644
—
—

12,508
—

—
—
—
—
—

—
—

1,447
10,860
11,644
11,066
936

35,953
8,876

32,321

12,508

—

44,829

$262,535

$12,508

$ —

$275,043

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company analyzed its investment portfolio and determined the municipal bonds, which
were previously classified as Level 1, should be classified as Level 2 based on the inputs used to measure fair value and the level of
market activity in those instruments. As such, transfers into Level 2 from Level 1 were $10,684 during the year ended December 31,
2013. In addition, $11,066 related to municipal bonds included in the table related to December 31, 2012 was transferred from Level
1 to Level 2. There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Assets Measured at Estimated Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis:

The Company used a discounted cash flow method, which relies on Level 3 inputs in valuing goodwill at November 30, 2012.
The Company did not identify the existence of goodwill and, as a result, goodwill was eliminated resulting in an impairment loss of
$161 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

With respect to the Company’s business acquisition completed in 2012 (see Note 6 — “Business Acquisitions”), all assets
acquired, aside from cash which was valued based on Level 1 measurements, and liabilities assumed were valued based on Level 3
measurements. Property, plant and equipment acquired in April 2012 was valued based on an external appraisal using the sales
comparison approach and other unobservable inputs. The carrying amounts of all other acquired assets and assumed liabilities
approximated their fair values at the acquisition date.

Note 6 — Business Acquisitions

Effective April 2, 2012, the Company, through its subsidiary, Greenleaf Capital LLP (formerly known as HCI Holdings LLC),
acquired the assets and operations of John’s Pass Marina, Inc. and Rice Family Holdings LLLP. The real estate consists primarily of
ten acres of waterfront property and land improvements, which include a waterfront restaurant and a marina facility purchased for
approximately $8,157. Operating activities at acquisition include the restaurant as well as wet boat storage and fuel services with
respect to marina clients and recreational boaters. The Treasure Island, Florida real estate and operations were acquired to further
strengthen and diversify the Company’s investment portfolio.

The fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $8,285, which exceeded the $8,157 purchase price. As a result, the
Company recognized a gain on bargain purchase in the amount of $179 ($119 net of tax), which is included in operations for the year
ended December 31, 2012. The following table summarizes the Company’s preliminary allocation of the net consideration paid to the
fair value of the assets acquired, identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at April 2, 2012:

Property, plant and equipment
Other assets
Cash
Deferred tax liability

Fair value of net assets acquired
Gain on bargain purchase, net of tax of $60

Cash consideration paid

$8,280
56
9
(60)

8,285
(119)

$8,166

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the effect of the acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial

statements and basic and diluted earnings per share and, as such, pro forma information has not been presented. The acquired
assets are included in other investments of the consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the acquired
business contributed approximately $4,553 in revenues and $698 of net loss inclusive of the net gain on bargain purchase.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 7 — Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

The following table summarizes the activity with respect to deferred policy acquisition costs:

Beginning balance
Policy acquisition costs deferred
Amortization

Ending balance

December 31,

2013
$ 10,032
31,097
(27,058)

2012
$ 12,321
15,984
(18,273)

$ 14,071

$ 10,032

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted, on a prospective basis, the accounting standards update related to DAC. As

such, the Company recognized additional amortization expense of $1,210 with a corresponding decrease in deferred acquisition
costs as of the date of adoption. This one-time adjustment reduced our net income for the year ended December 31, 2012 by
approximately $741, or $0.08 earnings per diluted common share. In addition, certain direct marketing, compensation, and other
administrative costs are no longer deferred. Rather, such costs are expensed as incurred beginning January 1, 2012.

The amount of policy acquisition costs amortized and included in policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses for the

years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $27,058, $18,273, and $19,450, respectively.

Note 8 — Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment, net consists of the following:

Land
Building
Computer hardware and software
Office furniture and equipment
Tenant and leasehold improvements
Other

Total, at cost
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

Property and equipment, net

December 31,

2013
$ 1,642
7,596
1,486
1,407
3,093
629

15,853
(2,721)

2012
$ 1,241
5,955
1,089
1,131
2,767
251

12,434
(1,581)

$13,132

$10,853

On February 28, 2013, the Company purchased real estate in Ocala, Florida for a total purchase price of $2,002. At acquisition,
the real estate consisted of 1.6 acres of land and a vacant office building with rentable area of approximately 16,000 square feet. The
facility is currently used by the Company’s insurance operations and, also, as an alternative location in the event a catastrophic event
impacts the Company’s home office and other support operations.

Depreciation and amortization expense under property and equipment was $1,151, $848 and $466, respectively, for the years

ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 9 — Other Assets

The following table summarizes the Company’s other assets:

Benefits receivable related to retrospective reinsurance contracts
Deferred costs related to retrospective reinsurance contracts
Deferred offering costs on senior notes issued in 2013
Prepaid expenses
Guarantee fund assessment recoverable
Other

Total other assets

December 31,

2013
$ 8,815
194
4,305
771
—
1,729

2012
$ —
—
127
582
482
1,105

$15,814

$2,296

Other assets include a $757 receivable related to the settlement of a 2009 revenue sharing agreement. The full settlement

amount was received in January 2014.

Note 10 — Long-Term Debt

The following table summarizes the Company’s long-term debt:

8% Senior Notes, due January 30, 2020
3.875% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2019*

Total long-term debt

December 31,

2013

$ 40,250
86,682

2012
$—
—

$126,932

$—

* net carrying value

8% Senior Notes

On January 17, 2013, the Company completed the sale of unsecured senior notes in a public offering for an aggregate principal
amount of $35,000. In addition, effective January 25, 2013, the Company received an aggregate principal amount of $5,250 pursuant
to the underwriters’ exercise of the over-allotment option. The offering was made pursuant to the Company’s effective registration
statement on Form S-3, as amended (Registration Statement No. 333-185228) and the prospectus supplement dated January 10,
2013. The combined net proceeds were $38,690 after underwriting and issuance costs of approximately $1,560, $1,525 of which was
paid during the year ended December 31, 2013. The notes will mature on January 30, 2020 and bear interest at a fixed annual rate of
8% payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30, commencing on April 30, 2013. The notes may be redeemed,
in whole or in part, at any time on and after January 30, 2016 upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days’ notice. The redemption
price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest. Additionally, the Company may, at
any time, repurchase the senior notes at any price in the open market and may hold, resell or surrender the notes for cancellation.

The senior notes rank on parity with all of the Company’s other existing and future senior unsecured obligations. In addition, to
the extent the senior notes are unsecured, they also rank junior in right of payment to any secured debt that the Company may have
outstanding to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

The senior notes contain customary restrictive covenants relating to merger, modification of the indenture, subordination,

issuance of debt securities and sale of assets, the most significant of which include limitations with respect to certain designated
subsidiaries on the incurrence of additional indebtedness or guarantees secured by any security interest on any shares of their
capital stock. The senior note covenants also limit the Company’s ability to sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of capital stock of
such designated subsidiaries. The senior note covenants do not contain any restrictions on the Company’s payment or declaration of
dividends nor require a sinking fund to be established for the purpose of redemption.

Interest expense with respect to the senior notes was approximately $3,228 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and

included amortization of debt issuance costs of approximately $159. The effective interest rate, taking into account the stated interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, approximates 8.7%.

3.875% Convertible Senior Notes

On December 11, 2013, the Company issued 3.875% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) in a private offering for

an aggregate principal amount of $100,000. In addition, pursuant to the over-allotment option exercised by the underwriters, the
Company received an aggregate principal amount of $3,000 on December 30, 2013. The aggregate net proceeds of the Convertible
Notes were $99,514, after $3,486 in related issuance and transaction costs of which $3,245 had been paid as of December 31, 2013.
The Convertible Notes rank equally in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated
obligations. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.875% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and
September 15 of each year. The Convertible Notes will mature on March 15, 2019 unless repurchased or converted prior to such
date. The Company may not redeem the Convertible Notes prior to maturity unless requested by the note holders under certain
events specified in the indenture.

The Convertible Notes do not contain any financial or operating covenants or restrictions on the payments of dividends, the

incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance or repurchase of securities by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Convertible
Notes provide no protection to the note holders in the event of a fundamental change or other corporate transaction involving the
Company except those described in the indenture to the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes do not require a sinking fund to be
established for the purpose of redemption.

In conjunction with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into a prepaid stock repurchase forward

contract and used $29,923 of the net proceeds from the Convertible Notes offering to repurchase the Company’s common stock. See
Note 15 — “Stockholders’ Equity” for the effect of the repurchase forward contract on earnings per share.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, interest expense applicable to the Convertible Notes included the contractual interest

coupon, discount amortization and amortization of allocated issuance costs aggregating $379, the amount of which included non-cash
interest expense of $164. The effective interest rate, taking into account both cash and non-cash components, approximates 8.3%. As
of December 31, 2013, the remaining amortization period of the debt discount was expected to be 5.2 years.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

The following table summarizes information regarding the equity and liability components of the Convertible Notes:

Principal amount
Unamortized discount

Liability component – net carrying value

Equity component – conversion, net of offering costs

December 31,
2013
$103,000
(16,318)

2012
$—
—

$ 86,682

$—

$ 15,900

$—

Embedded Conversion Feature

Each $1 of principal of the Convertible Notes will initially be convertible into 16.0090 shares of common stock, which is the
equivalent of approximately $62.47 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events but will not be adjusted
for any accrued and unpaid interest. The note holders may convert all or a portion of their Convertible Notes during specified periods
as follows: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2014, if the last reported sale
price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last
trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading
day; (2) during the five business-day period after any ten consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price per $1 principal
amount of the Convertible Notes is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price and the conversion rate on each such
trading day; (3) if specified corporate events, including a change in control, occur; or (4) at any time on or after January 1, 2019.

The note holders who elect to convert their Convertible Notes in connection with a fundamental change as described in the

indenture will be entitled to a “make-whole” adjustment in the form of an increase in the conversion rate. Upon conversion, the
Company has options to satisfy its conversion obligation by paying or delivering cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of
cash and shares of its common stock. As of December 31, 2013, none of the conditions allowing the note holders to convert had been
met.

The Company determined that the embedded conversion feature is not a derivative financial instrument but rather is required to
be separately accounted for in equity because the Company may elect to settle the conversion option entirely or partially in cash. At
issuance, the Company accounted for the equity component of the embedded conversion feature, which amounted to $16,457, as a
reduction in the carrying amount of the debt and an increase in additional paid-in capital. The increase in additional paid-in capital
was offset in part by $557 in related transaction costs.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Embedded Redemption Feature

The note holders also have the right to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of the Convertible Notes at

par prior to the maturity date should any of the fundamental change events described in the indenture occur. The Company
concluded that the embedded redemption feature is not a derivative financial instrument and that it is not probable at issuance that
any of the specified fundamental change events will occur. Therefore, the embedded redemption feature is not substantive and will
not affect the expected life of the liability component.

Note 11 — Reinsurance

The Company cedes a portion of its homeowners insurance exposure to other entities under catastrophe excess of loss
reinsurance treaties. The Company remains liable with respect to claims payments in the event that any of the reinsurers are unable
to meet their obligations under the reinsurance agreements. Failure of reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to
the Company. The Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentrations of credit risk arising from
similar geographic regions, activities or economic characteristics of the reinsurers to minimize its exposure to significant losses from
reinsurer insolvencies. The Company contracts with a number of reinsurers to secure its annual reinsurance coverage, which
generally becomes effective June 1st each year. The Company purchases reinsurance each year taking into consideration maximum
projected losses and reinsurance market conditions.

The impact of the catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance treaties on premiums written and earned is as follows:

Premiums Written:

Direct
Assumed

Gross written
Ceded

Net premiums written

Premiums Earned:

Direct
Assumed

Gross earned
Ceded

Net premiums earned

Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

$ 315,695
39,076

354,771
(102,865)

$205,839
73,340

279,179
(75,939)

$125,145
62,104

187,249
(55,525)

$ 251,906

$203,240

$131,724

$ 273,037
64,076

337,113
(102,865)

$168,937
64,670

233,607
(75,939)

$119,756
23,850

143,606
(55,525)

$ 234,248

$157,668

$ 88,081

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were no recoveries pertaining to reinsurance contracts that

were deducted from losses incurred. Prepaid reinsurance premiums related to 27 reinsurers at December 31, 2013 and 31 reinsurers
at December 31, 2012, respectively. There were no amounts receivable with respect to reinsurers at December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Thus, there were no concentrations of credit risk associated with reinsurance receivables and prepaid reinsurance premiums as of
December 31, 2013 and 2012. The ratio of assumed premiums earned to net premiums earned for the years ended December 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011 were 27.4%, 41.0%, and 27.1%, respectively.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Certain of the reinsurance contracts include retrospective provisions that adjust premiums, increase the amount of future
coverage, or result in profit commissions in the event losses are minimal or zero. As a result, the Company’s reported revenue for the
year ended December 31, 2013 includes a net reduction in ceded premiums of $12,521 comprised of various components of these
adjustments, with $9,009 and $3,512 included in other assets and prepaid reinsurance premiums, respectively. See “Reinsurance”
under Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Note 12 — Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) is determined on an individual case basis for all claims reported.

The liability also includes amounts for unallocated expenses, anticipated future claim development and losses incurred, but not
reported.

Activity in the liability for losses and LAE is summarized as follows:

Balance, beginning of year

Incurred related to:

Current year
Prior years

Total incurred

Paid related to:

Current year
Prior years

Total paid

Balance, end of year

Years Ended December 31,
2012
$ 27,424

2013
$ 41,168

2011
$ 22,146

67,579
(2,456)

66,425
(115)

43,613
4,630

65,123

66,310

48,243

(40,240)
(22,365)

(36,914)
(15,652)

(26,132)
(16,833)

(62,605)

(52,566)

(42,965)

$ 43,686

$ 41,168

$ 27,424

The significant increase in the Company’s liability for unpaid losses and LAE from 2011 to 2012 is primarily due to the increase

in policy base as a result of the HomeWise assumption in November 2011 and the Citizens assumption in November 2012.

The establishment of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process and changes in loss reserve estimates are expected as
such estimates are subject to the outcome of future events. Changes in estimates, or differences between estimates and amounts
ultimately paid, are reflected in the operating results of the period during which such adjustments are made. During the year ended
December 31, 2013, the Company experienced favorable development of $2,456 with respect to its net unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses established for the year ended December 31, 2012. Factors attributable to this favorable development include a
lower severity of claims and reduced frequency of reported claims.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

The Company writes insurance in the state of Florida, which could be exposed to hurricanes or other natural catastrophes. The
occurrence of a major catastrophe could have a significant effect on the Company’s yearly results and cause a temporary disruption
of the normal operations of the Company. However, the Company is unable to predict the frequency or severity of any such events
that may occur in the near term or thereafter.

Note 13 — Income Taxes

A summary of income tax expense is as follows:

Current:

Federal
State
Foreign

Total current taxes

Deferred:

Federal
State

Total deferred taxes

Income tax expense

Years Ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

$34,372
5,844
118

$18,484
3,168
137

$ 7,220
1,196
9

40,334

21,789

8,425

514
43

(1,986)
(380)

(1,715)
(269)

557

(2,366)

(1,984)

$40,891

$19,423

$ 6,441

The reasons for the differences between the statutory Federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate are summarized as

follows:

Income taxes at statutory rate
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from :

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
Other

Income tax expense

2013

Years Ended December 31,
2012
Amount % Amount % Amount %
$37,258 35.0 $17,353 35.0 $ 5,785 35.0

2011

3,802 3.6 1,799 3.6
271 0.6

(169) (0.2)

599 3.6
57 0.7

$40,891 38.4 $19,423 39.2 $ 6,441 39.3

The Company has no uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective income

tax rate. The tax years ending December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 remain subject to examination by the Company’s major taxing
jurisdictions. The Company elected to classify, if any, interest and penalties arising from uncertain tax positions as income tax
expense as permitted by current accounting standards. There have been no such interest or penalties during the three years ended
December 31, 2013. In January 2014, the Company received notice from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to an
examination of the Company’s 2011 federal income tax return. The examination commenced in the first quarter of 2014. In February
2014, the Company received notice from the Florida Department of Revenue with respect to an examination of the Company’s 2010,
2011 and 2012 state income tax returns. The examination commenced in the first quarter of 2014.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities

for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income tax (liabilities) assets are as follows:

Deferred tax assets:

Unearned premiums
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Organizational costs
Stock-based compensation
Accrued expenses
Deferred expenses
Unearned revenue
Bad debt reserve

Total deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities:

Property and equipment
Deferred policy acquisition costs
Unrealized net gain on securities available-for-sale
Basis difference related to convertible senior notes
Prepaid expenses
Unearned brokerage income
Other

Total deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets

December 31,

2013

2012

$ 8,829
885
95
2,026
163
—
52
5

$ 9,149
1,116
106
394
40
72
—
—

12,055

10,877

(1,748)
(5,600)
(700)
(6,295)
(296)
—
(156)

(1,519)
(4,027)
(1,017)
—
(225)
(105)
(136)

(14,795)

(7,029)

$ (2,740)

$ 3,848

A valuation allowance is established if, based upon the relevant facts and circumstances, management believes any portion of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Although realization of deferred income tax assets is not certain, management believes it
is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result, the Company did not have a valuation allowance
established as of December 31, 2013 or 2012.

Note 14 — Earnings Per Share

U.S. GAAP requires the Company to use the two-class method in computing basic earnings per share since holders of the
Company’s restricted stock have the right to share in dividends, if declared, equally with common stockholders. These participating
securities effect the computation of both basic and diluted earnings per share during periods of net income.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

A summary of the numerator and denominator of the basic and fully diluted earnings per common share is presented below:

Year Ended December 31, 2013
Net income
Less: Preferred stock dividends
Less: Income attributable to participating securities

Basic Earnings Per Share:
Income allocated to common stockholders

Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock options
Convertible preferred stock
Convertible senior notes

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions

Year Ended December 31, 2012
Net income
Less: Preferred stock dividends
Less: Income attributable to participating securities

Basic Earnings Per Share:
Income available to common stockholders

Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock options
Convertible preferred stock
Warrants

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions

Year Ended December 31, 2011
Net income
Less: Preferred stock dividends

Basic Earnings Per Share:
Income available to common stockholders

Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock options
Convertible preferred stock

Income
(Numerator)

(Denominator)

Per Share
Amount

65,562
(104)
(3,213)

62,245

10,691

5.82

—
104
237

163
178
90

62,586

11,122

5.63

30,157
(322)
(488)

29,347

8,497

3.45

—
322
—

220
655
441

29,669

9,813

3.02

9,964
(815)

9,149

6,132

1.49

—
815

352
961

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions

9,964

7,445

1.34

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended December 31, 2011, 2,738,335 warrants to purchase 1,405,001 shares of common stock were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of $9.10 exceeded the average market price of the
Company’s common stock. On September 26, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors fixed October 27, 2012 as the cancellation
date for the IPO warrants. As such, the record holders of the IPO warrants had no further rights under the warrants on and after
October 27, 2012.

Note 15 — Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

In April 2012, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of its common stock, in which the Company sold an

aggregate of 1,840,000 shares of its common stock at $11.75 per share. The offering resulted in aggregate gross proceeds to the
Company of $21,620 and net proceeds of approximately $20,082 after underwriting commissions and offering expenses.

Series B Junior Participating Preferred Share Purchase Right

On October 17, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (“Right”) for

each outstanding share of its common stock to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2013. Each Right
entitles the common shareholder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Junior Participating
Preferred Stock, no par value, at a price of $125.00 per one one-hundredth of such preferred share, subject to adjustment for certain
events. The Right is intended to prevent any unsolicited takeover attempt that is unfair and unfavorable to the Company’s
shareholders. The Right will not interfere with any merger approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Right will not be exercisable until ten days following a public announcement that a person or group has acquired beneficial

ownership of 10% or more of the Company’s common stock or until ten business days after a person or group begins a tender or
exchange offer that would result in beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the Company’s common stock. The Right may be
redeemed or exchanged by the Company for $0.001 per Right at any time until the Right’s expiration date on October 18, 2018.

Prepaid Share Repurchase Forward Contract

Effective December 11, 2013, in conjunction with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into a prepaid

share repurchase forward contract (the “forward contract”) with Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch (the “forward counterparty”).
Pursuant to the forward contract, the Company prepaid $29,923 of the net proceeds of the offering to repurchase 622,751 shares of
the Company’s common stock under which the shares will be delivered over a settlement period in 2019. The forward contract is
subject to early settlement, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the final settlement date at the option of the forward counterparty,
as well as early settlement or settlement with alternative consideration in the event of certain corporate transactions. In the event the
Company pays any cash dividends on its common shares, the forward counterparty will pay an equivalent amount to the Company.
The shares to be purchased under the prepaid forward contract will be treated as retired as of the effective date of the forward
contract, but will remain outstanding for corporate law purposes, including for purposes of any future stockholders votes.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

The Company determined that the forward contract does not meet the characteristic of a derivative instrument and, as such, the

transaction resulted in an immediate reduction of the outstanding shares used to calculate the weighted-average common shares
outstanding for both basic and diluted earnings per share.

Common Stock Warrants

On September 26, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors fixed October 27, 2012 as the cancellation date for the warrants that

were issued in 2008 in connection with the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”). As such, the record holders of the IPO warrants
had no further rights under the warrants on and after October 27, 2012.

Effective December 31, 2012, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued upon the exercise of 1,000,000 warrants that were
issued in 2011 in connection with the HomeWise assumption transaction. The fair value of the warrants issued in 2011 was estimated
on the date of issuance using the following assumptions and the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

Expected dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life (in years)
Per share grant date fair value of warrants issued

5.0%
52%
0.23%
1.75
$0.754

The $754 aggregate value of the warrants was deferred and amortized over the expected policy term of the policies assumed in

the transaction. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $241, $463, and $50 of
expense, respectively, which is included in other operating expenses.

As of December 31, 2012, there were no warrants outstanding.

Preferred Stock

Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”)

As of December 31, 2013, 110,684 shares of Series A Preferred remain outstanding. Dividends on the Series A Preferred are

cumulative and accrue on the last day of each month, at an annual rate of 7.0% of the $10 liquidation preference per share,
equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $0.70 per share. Accrued but unpaid dividends accumulate and earn additional dividends at
7.0%, compounded monthly.

Shareholders of Series A Preferred may convert all or any portion of their shares, at their option, at any time, into shares of the
Company’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of one share of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred, which is
equivalent to an initial conversion price of $10 per share; provided, however, that the Company may terminate this conversion right
on or after

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

March 31, 2014, if for at least twenty trading days within any period of thirty consecutive trading days, the market price of the
Company’s common stock exceeds the conversion price of the Series A Preferred by more than 20% and the Company’s common
stock is then traded on specified exchange markets. Under certain circumstances, the Company will be required to adjust the
conversion rate. The initial conversion price of $10 per share is subject to proportionate adjustment in the event of stock splits,
reverse stock splits, stock dividends, or similar changes with respect to the Company’s common stock. On February 4, 2014, the
Company announced its Board of Directors fixed April 1, 2014 as the cancellation date for the conversion rights on its 7% Series A
Preferred. As such, the record holders of the Series A Preferred will no longer have conversion rights on and after April 1, 2014.

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, holders of 130,498 and 1,006,518 shares of Series A Preferred

converted their Series A Preferred shares to 130,498 and 1,006,518 shares of common stock, respectively.

Shareholders of the Company’s Series A Preferred at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to receive the
dividends payable on their Series A Preferred shares on the corresponding dividend payment date notwithstanding the conversion of
such Series A Preferred shares before the dividend payment date. The Series A Preferred terms include a provision requiring such
shareholders to pay an amount equal to the amount of the dividend payable. That requirement has been permanently waived by the
Company.

Holders of the Series A Preferred shares generally have no voting rights, except under limited circumstances, and holders are

entitled to receive cumulative preferential dividends when and as declared by the Company’s Board of Directors.

On December 24, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on its Series A Preferred shares in the

amount of $0.05833 per share for each of the months of December 2013, January 2014, and February 2014. The December 2013
dividend was paid on January 27, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 2, 2014. The January 2014
dividend was paid on February 27, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 3, 2014. The February 2014
dividend is payable on March 27, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 3, 2014.

Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”)

On October 17, 2013, in connection with the declaration of the Right dividends, the Company’s Board of Directors established

and fixed the rights and preferences of the Series B Preferred. Of the authorized shares, the Company designated 400,000 shares as
Series B Preferred. Each Series B Preferred will be entitled to a minimum preferential quarterly dividend payment of $1.00 per share
but will be entitled to an aggregate dividend of 100 times the dividend declared per common share of the Company. In the event of
liquidation, the holders of the Series B Preferred will be entitled to a minimum preferential liquidation payment of $100 per share but
will be entitled to an aggregate payment of 100 times the payment made per common share. Each Series B Preferred will have 100
votes per share, voting together as one class on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company. Finally, in the event
of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which common shares are exchanged, each Series B Preferred will be entitled to
receive 100 times the amount received per common share. The aforementioned rights of Series B Preferred are protected by
customary anti-dilution provisions. As of December 31, 2013, there were no Series B Preferred issued or outstanding.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Undesignated Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to an additional 18,100,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value. The authorized but

unissued and undesignated preferred stock may be issued in one or more series and the shares of each series shall have such rights
as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors subject to the rights of the holders of the Series A Preferred and Series B
Preferred.

Note 16 — Stock-Based Compensation

Incentive Plan

The Company has outstanding stock-based awards granted under the 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (“2007 Plan”) and

its 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) which are collectively called “the Incentive Plan.” The Company terminated the
2007 Plan in 2012 and thus there were no shares available for future grant under the 2007 Plan. With respect to the Incentive Plan
which permits the granting of stock-based awards to employees, directors, consultants, and advisors of the Company, the aggregate
number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance is 5,000,000. At December 31, 2013, there were 4,344,350
shares available for grant under the Incentive Plan.

Stock Options

Stock options granted and outstanding under the Incentive Plan vest over periods ranging from immediately vested to five years

and are exercisable over the contractual term of ten years.

A summary of the stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual

Term
6.5 years

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ 4,675

2.97

5.7 years

$ 3,122

3.03

2.91

4.9 years

$ 5,007

2.91

3.9 years

$ 14,166

2.78

3.8 years

$ 13,694

Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price
2.71
6.30
2.50
2.50

$
$
$
$

Outstanding at January 1, 2011
Issued
Forfeited
Exercised

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

Exercised

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

Exercisable at December 31, 2013

Number of

Options
870,000
30,000
(24,800)
(255,200)

620,000

(340,000)

280,000

270,000

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

The following table summarizes information about options exercised, and the fair value of vested options for the years ended

December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

Options exercised
Intrinsic value of exercised options
Tax benefits realized
Fair value of vested options

2013
—
—
—
$ 17

2012

340,000
3,648
$
1,161
$
22
$

2011
255,200
1,184
$
265
$
76
$

During the year ended December 31, 2012, a total of 340,000 options were exercised of which 227,003 options were net settled
by surrender of 72,592 shares. During the year ended December 31, 2011, a total of 255,200 options were exercised, which includes
30,000 options exercised and net settled by surrender of 9,317 shares. Compensation expense recognized for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 totaled approximately $19, $68 and $27, respectively, and is included in other operating
expenses. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was approximately $6 and $25, respectively, of unrecognized compensation
expense related to nonvested stock options granted under the plan. The Company expects to recognize the remaining compensation
expense over a weighted-average period of 4 months. Deferred tax benefits related to stock options for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were immaterial.

No options were granted during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. In 2011, 30,000 options were granted with fair

value estimated on the date of grant using the following assumptions and the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

Expected dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life (in years)

6.3%
53.3%
0.97%
5.00

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Restricted Stock Awards

From time to time, the Company has granted and may grant restricted stock awards to certain executive officers, other
employees and nonemployee directors in connection with their service to the Company. The terms of the Company’s outstanding
restricted stock grants may include service, performance and market-based conditions. The fair value of the awards with market-
based conditions is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation method, which calculates many potential outcomes for an award and
then establishes fair value based on the most likely outcome. The determination of fair value with respect to the awards with only
performance or service-based conditions is based on the value of the Company’s stock on the grant date.

Information with respect to the activity of unvested restricted stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2013 and

2012 is as follows:

Nonvested at January 1, 2012
Granted

Nonvested at December 31, 2012

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
—
14.54

14.54

27.36

Number of
Restricted
Stock
Awards
—
246,320

246,320

612,000
(93,000)
(29,670)

Nonvested at December 31, 2013

735,650

25.48

The Company recognized compensation expense, which is included in other operating expenses, of $5,346 and $776,

respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was approximately $13,757
and $2,805, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock arrangements. The
Company expects to recognize the remaining compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 27 months. The following
table summarizes information about deferred tax benefits recognized related to restricted stock awards and the fair value of vested
restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Deferred tax benefits recognized
Fair value of vested restricted stock

2013
$2,062
$1,133

2012
$299
$ —

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company realized tax benefits of approximately $277 related to cash dividends

paid on restricted stock. The following presents assumptions used in a Monte Carlo simulation model to determine the fair value of
the awards with market-based conditions:

Expected dividends per share
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Estimated cost of capital
Expected life (in years)

Note 17 — Employee Benefit Plan

2013

0.90

$
41.5 – 51.6%
0.0 – 1.9%
9.3 – 10.3%
4.00 – 6.00

2012

0.80

$
36.7 – 50.0%
0.1 – 1.2%
11.9 – 12.1%

6.00

Effective July 1, 2013, the Company implemented a 401(k) Safe Harbor Profit Sharing Plan (“401(k) Plan”) that qualifies as a
defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, participating employees are
eligible for company matching and discretionary profit sharing contributions. Plan participants may elect to defer up to one hundred
percent of their pre-tax gross wages, subject to annual limitations. The company matching contribution is limited to a maximum of four
percent of the employee’s annual salary or wage and is fully vested when contributed. Eligibility and vesting of the Company’s
discretionary profit sharing contribution is subject to the plan participant’s years of service. During the year ended December 31,
2013, the Company contributed approximately $183 in matching contributions, which is included in other operating expenses. There
was no discretionary profit sharing contribution in 2013.

The Company also maintains benefit plans for its employees in India including a statutory post-employment benefit plan, or
gratuity plan, providing defined, lump-sum benefits. The Company’s liability for the gratuity plan reflects the undiscounted benefit
obligation payable as of the balance sheet date, which was based upon the employees’ salary and years of service. As of
December 31, 2013, the amount accrued under the gratuity plan was $6. In addition, the Company provides matching contributions
with respect to two defined contribution plans; the Provident Fund and the Employees State Insurance Fund, both of which are
available to qualifying employees in India. Expense recognized by the Company for all benefit plans in India was $7 for the year
ended December 31, 2013. No expense was recognized for any benefit plan in India for the years ended December 31, 2012 and
2011.

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

The Company currently leases 15,000 square feet of office space in Noida, India. The lease has an initial term of nine years

commencing January 15, 2013 with monthly rental payments of approximately $10 plus applicable service tax for the first year.
Thereafter the monthly rental payment will increase by five percent every year. The Company is entitled to terminate the lease 36
months after the commencement date by providing 3 months’ written notice to the landlord.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Provided the lease is not early terminated, minimum future rental payments under operating leases after December 31, 2013 are

as follows:

Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter

Total minimum future payments

Amount
$ 114
120
126
133
139
461

$ 1,093

Rental expense under all facility leases was $248, $527 and $239, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2013,

2012 and 2011. Expense in 2012 and 2011 include amounts related to the Company’s former corporate headquarters.

Service Agreement

In connection with the lease for new office space in India as described in the lease commitments above, the Company signed a

long-term contract with the landlord to receive maintenance and facility services. The agreement has the same initial term of nine
years with monthly payments of approximately $2 plus applicable service tax for the first year. Thereafter the monthly payment will
increase by five percent every year. The Company is also entitled to terminate the agreement 36 months after the commencement
date by providing 3 months’ written notice to the landlord.

Provided the agreement is not early terminated, minimum future payments under the service agreement after December 31,

2013 are as follows:

Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter

Total minimum future payments

Rental Income

Amount
21
$
21
23
24
25
83

$ 197

The Company owns real estate that consists of 3.5 acres of land, a building with gross area of 122,000 square feet, and a four-

level parking garage. This facility is used by the Company and its subsidiaries. In addition, the Company leases space to non-
affiliates.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Expected annual rental income due under non-cancellable operating leases for all properties and other investments owned at

December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Year
2014
2015
2016
2017

Total

Amount
$ 894
618
307
27

$ 1,846

Regulatory Assessments

a) Regular Insurance Assessments and Surcharges

As a direct premium writer in the state of Florida, the Company is subject to mandatory assessments by Citizens and the Florida
Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (“FHCF”). These assessments are paid based on a percentage of the Company’s direct written premium
by line of business. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, HCPCI paid assessments to FHCF amounting to
$4,103, $2,517 and $1,592, respectively. Additionally, HCPCI paid assessments to Citizens of $3,156, $1,936 and $1,604,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s other liabilities
included $341 and $444 payable to Citizens and FHCF, respectively. These assessments are recorded as a surcharge in premium
billings to insureds. As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the surcharge rates in effect for FHCF and Citizens were 1.3% and
1.0%, respectively, for each of these years.

b) Guaranty Fund

The Florida Insurance Guaranty Association may assess the Company to provide for the payment of covered claims of insolvent
insurance entities. The assessments are generally based on a percentage of premiums written as of the end of the prior year in which
the assessment is levied. Although the Company is permitted by Florida statutes to recover the entire amount of assessments from
existing and future policyholders through policy surcharges, liabilities are recognized when the assessments are probable to be
imposed on the premiums on which they are expected to be based and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. During 2012, the
Company paid $1,139 of guaranty fund assessments, $482 of which was recognized as an asset recoverable from policyholders. The
balance of $657 was charged to expense in 2012. As approved by the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, the Company had
recovered a total of $1,030 during 2013, $434 of which was credited to the asset recoverable from policyholders. The amount
recovered in excess of $434 reduced the Company’s 2013 policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses and was offset by a
$48 expense for the amount unrecovered from policyholders. At December 31, 2013, the Company has no liability related to guaranty
fund assessments.

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

In connection with the acquisition of one of the Company’s properties located in Pinellas County, Florida, the Company assumed

the liability to complete a site assessment and remediation of environmental contamination that resulted from a petroleum release at
the marina site in late 2009. At acquisition, the Company recorded a liability of $150 with respect to the planned remedial action.
Such liability was determined based on reasonably estimable costs of completing the actions defined in the work plan. As of
December 31, 2013, a total of $117 has been expended with respect to the site assessment and remediation and the remaining $33
accrued at acquisition is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Even with the Company’s best
effort in estimating the costs, it is possible that additional testing and additional environmental monitoring and remediation will be
required as part of the Company’s ongoing discussions with the Florida Department of Health, the agency contracted by the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection to administer cases of petroleum contamination in Pinellas County, in which case additional
expenses could exceed the current estimated liability. However, based on information known at December 31, 2013, the Company
does not expect that such additional expenses would have a material, adverse effect on the liquidity or financial condition of the
Company.

Premium Tax

In September 2013, the Company received a notice of intent to make audit adjustments from the Pittsburgh Service Center of
the Florida Department of Revenue (“FDR”) in connection with the FDR’s audit of the Company’s premium tax returns for the three-
year period ended December 31, 2012. The auditor’s proposed adjustments primarily relate to the disallowance of the entire amount
of $1,754 in Florida salary credits applicable to that period. The proposed adjustment, which includes interest through September 10,
2013, approximates $1,913. Management has held discussions with the FDR staff and will continue working with the FDR to resolve
this matter. The Company is confident in the merits of its position in claiming the Florida salary credits and intends to vigorously
defend its position. As such, and based on the current status of and likelihood of final resolution, the Company has no amount
accrued as of December 31, 2013 related to this contingency.

Litigation

The Company is party to claims and legal actions arising routinely in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of

management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material, adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or
liquidity.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 19 — Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The tables below summarize unaudited quarterly results of operations for 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Three Months Ended
06/30/13

09/30/13

03/31/13

12/31/13
$60,551 $57,335 $52,934 $63,428
65,252
17,348
9,456
1,228
40,020
25,232
15,562
15,546

59,333
17,414
7,308
846
32,926
26,407
16,235
16,203

54,692
14,489
8,887
847
33,048
21,644
13,378
13,356

61,811
15,872
5,968
686
28,641
33,170
20,387
20,353

$
$

1.87 $
1.81 $

1.44 $
1.40 $

1.17 $
1.13 $

1.36
1.31

Three Months Ended
06/30/12

09/30/12

03/31/12

12/31/12
$40,431 $37,070 $30,603 $49,564
51,077
15,928
6,240
30,012
21,065
13,101
13,065

38,855
16,197
6,243
26,846
12,009
7,262
7,199

31,481
15,017
6,611
26,356
5,125
2,826
2,784

41,652
19,168
6,836
30,271
11,381
6,968
6,787

$
$

1.07 $
0.88 $

0.85 $
0.74 $

0.30 $
0.27 $

1.27
1.19

Three Months Ended
06/30/11

09/30/11

03/31/11

12/31/11
$16,674 $17,044 $18,530 $35,833
36,566
16,886
7,557
28,543
8,023
4,796
4,578

19,713
10,431
3,529
16,407
3,306
2,074
1,856

19,481
10,523
2,780
15,660
3,821
2,301
1,940

18,049
10,403
4,263
16,794
1,255
793
776

$
$

0.13 $
0.12 $

0.32 $
0.30 $

0.30 $
0.27 $

0.74
0.62

Net premiums earned
Total revenue
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
Interest expense
Total expenses
Income before income taxes
Net income
Net income available to common stockholders
Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

Net premiums earned
Total revenue
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
Total expenses
Income before income taxes
Net income
Net income available to common stockholders
Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 20 — Regulatory Requirements and Restrictions

The following briefly describes certain requirements and restrictions regulated by the states or jurisdiction in which the

Company’s insurance subsidiaries are incorporated.

Florida

HCPCI, which is domiciled in Florida, prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting principles and

practices prescribed or permitted by the Florida Department of Financial Services, Office of Insurance Regulation (the “FLOIR”),
which Florida utilizes for determining solvency under the Florida Insurance Code (the “Code”). The commissioner of the FLOIR has
the right to permit other practices that may deviate from prescribed practices. Prescribed statutory accounting practices are those
practices that are incorporated directly or by reference in state laws, regulations, and general administrative rules applicable to all
insurance enterprises domiciled in Florida. Permitted statutory accounting practices encompass all accounting practices that are not
prescribed; such practices differ from state to state, may differ from entity to entity within a state, and may change in the future.

The Code requires HCPCI to maintain capital and surplus equal to the greater of 10% of its liabilities or a statutory minimum as

defined in the Code. At December 31, 2013, HCPCI is required to maintain a minimum capital and surplus of $20,435.

U.S. GAAP differs in certain respects from the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities

(statutory-basis). HCPCI’s statutory-basis financial statements are presented on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or
permitted by the FLOIR. The FLOIR has adopted the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s (“NAIC”) Accounting
Practices and Procedures Manual as the basis of its statutory accounting practices. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, HCPCI’s
statutory-basis capital and surplus was $116,900, $69,800 and $46,500, respectively. HCPCI had a statutory-basis net income of
$45,700 and $13,200, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and a statutory net loss of $4,300 for the year
ended December 31, 2011. Statutory-basis surplus differs from stockholders’ equity reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP primarily
because policy acquisition costs are expensed when incurred. In addition, the recognition of deferred tax assets is based on different
recoverability assumptions.

Since inception, HCPCI has maintained a cash deposit with the Insurance Commissioner of the state of Florida, in the amount of

$300, to meet regulatory requirements.

Under Florida law, a domestic insurer may not pay any dividend or distribute cash or other property to its stockholders except
out of that part of its available and accumulated capital and surplus funds which is derived from realized net operating profits on its
business and net realized capital gains. A Florida domestic insurer may not make dividend payments or distributions to stockholders
without prior approval of the FLOIR if the dividend or distribution would exceed the larger of (1) the lesser of (a) 10.0% of its capital
surplus or (b) net income, not including realized capital gains, plus a two year carry forward, (2) 10.0% of capital surplus with
dividends payable constrained to unassigned funds minus 25% of unrealized capital gains or (3) the lesser of (a) 10.0% of capital
surplus or (b) net investment income plus a three year carry forward with dividends payable constrained to unassigned funds minus
25% of unrealized capital gains.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Alternatively, a Florida domestic insurer may pay a dividend or distribution without the prior written approval of the FLOIR (1) if

the dividend is equal to or less than the greater of (a) 10.0% of the insurer’s capital surplus as regards policyholders derived from
realized net operating profits on its business and net realized capital gains or (b) the insurer’s entire net operating profits and realized
net capital gains derived during the immediately preceding calendar year, (2) the insurer will have policy holder capital surplus equal
to or exceeding 115.0% of the minimum required statutory capital surplus after the dividend or distribution, (3) the insurer files a
notice of the dividend or distribution with the FLOIR at least ten business days prior to the dividend payment or distribution and (4) the
notice includes a certification by an officer of the insurer attesting that, after the payment of the dividend or distribution, the insurer will
have at least 115% of required statutory capital surplus as to policyholders. Except as provided above, a Florida domiciled insurer
may only pay a dividend or make a distribution (1) subject to prior approval by the FLOIR or (2) 30 days after the FLOIR has received
notice of such dividend or distribution and has not disapproved it within such time.

HCPCI may make dividend payments for the year ended December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, no dividends

were available to be paid by HCPCI.

In addition, a Florida insurance company is required to adhere to prescribed premium-to-capital surplus ratios. Florida state law

requires that the ratio of 90% of written premiums divided by surplus as to policyholders does not exceed 10 to 1 for gross written
premiums or 4 to 1 for net written premiums. The ratio of gross and net written premium to surplus for the year ended December 31,
2013, was 2.76 to 1, and 1.68 to 1, respectively. The ratio of gross and net written premium to surplus for the year ended
December 31, 2012, was 3.63 to 1, and 2.27 to 1, respectively. The ratio of gross and net written premium to surplus for the year
ended December 31, 2011, was 3.65 to 1, and 2.44 to 1, respectively.

Alabama

Homeowners Choice Assurance Company, Inc. (“HCA”) is domiciled in Alabama and was organized in 2013. HCA is required to

maintain minimum paid-in capital of $500. In addition, HCA must maintain a minimum deposit in trust of $100 with the Treasurer of
Alabama. At December 31, 2013, HCA’s statutory capital and surplus was $1,969. Similar to HCPCI in Florida, HCA is required to file
statutory-basis financial statements with the Alabama Department of Insurance, which has also adopted the NAIC Accounting
Practices and Procedures Manual as the basis of its statutory accounting practices.

Table of Contents

Bermuda

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

The Bermuda Monetary Authority requires Claddaugh to maintain minimum capital and surplus of $2,000. At December 31,

2013, 2012 and 2011, Claddaugh’s statutory capital and surplus was $15,526, $10,313 and $8,801, respectively. Claddaugh’s
statutory net profit was $4,164, $4,818 and $4,259, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. During the
years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Claddaugh paid its parent, HCI, cash dividends of $4,000, $6,000 and $0,
respectively.

HCPCI and HCA are subject to risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements as specified by the NAIC. Under those requirements,

the amount of minimum capital and surplus maintained by a property and casualty insurance company is to be determined based on
the various risks related to it. Pursuant to the RBC requirements, insurers having less statutory capital than required by the RBC
calculation will be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action, depending on the level of capital inadequacy. At December 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s insurance subsidiaries exceeded any applicable minimum risk-based capital requirements and
no corrective actions have been required

Note 21 — Related Party Transactions

Claddaugh has one reinsurance treaty with Moksha Re SPC Ltd. and multiple capital partners (“Moksha”) whereby a portion of

the business assumed from the Company’s insurance subsidiary, HCPCI, is ceded by Claddaugh to Moksha. With respect to the
period from June 1, 2013 through May 31, 2014, Moksha assumed approximately $15,400 of the total covered exposure for
approximately $4,300 in premiums, a rate which management believes to be competitive with market rates available to Claddaugh.
The $4,300 premium was fully paid by Claddaugh on June 27, 2013. With respect to the 2012-2013 treaty year, which covers the
period from June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013, Moksha assumed $13,800 of the total covered exposure for approximately $4,000 in
premiums. Moksha has deposited funds into a trust account to fully collateralize Moksha’s exposure. Trust assets may be withdrawn
by HCPCI, the trust beneficiary, in the event amounts are due under the 2013-2014 Moksha reinsurance agreement. Among the
Moksha capital partner participants are the Company’s chief executive officer, Paresh Patel, and certain of his immediate family
members and Sanjay Madhu, one of the Company’s non-employee directors.

Claddaugh also has reinsurance treaties with Oxbridge Reinsurance Limited (“Oxbridge”) whereby a portion of the business

assumed from HCPCI is ceded by Claddaugh to Oxbridge. With respect to the period from June 1, 2013 through May 31, 2014,
Oxbridge assumed $10,100 of the total covered exposure for approximately $4,900 in premiums, a rate which management believes
to be competitive with market rates available to Claddaugh. The $4,900 premium was fully paid by Claddaugh on July 9, 2013.
Oxbridge has deposited funds into a trust account to fully collateralize Oxbridge’s exposure. Trust assets may be withdrawn by
HCPCI, the trust beneficiary, in the event amounts are due under the 2013-2014 Oxbridge reinsurance agreement. Among the
Oxbridge capital partner participants are Paresh Patel, the Company’s chief executive officer who is also chairman of the board of
directors for Oxbridge, and members of his immediate family and Anthony Saravanos, president of Greenleaf Capital, the Company’s
real estate division. In addition, two of the Company’s non-employee directors, including Sanjay Madhu who serves as Oxbridge’s
president and chief executive officer, are investors in Oxbridge.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

One of the Company’s directors is a partner at a law firm that manages certain of the Company’s corporate legal matters. Fees

incurred with respect to this law firm for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were approximately $450, $335 and
$232, respectively.

During 2011 and 2012, the Company leased office space under an operating lease agreement with one director. The lease

required annual base rental payments of approximately $150. The lease was terminated in December 2012 and the total payments
during 2012 and 2011 were $179 and $160, respectively.

Effective April 4, 2011, the Company repurchased and retired a total of 80,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a

price of $8.00 per share for a total cost of $640. Such shares were repurchased under a stock purchase agreement with one of the
Company’s directors at a price below the $8.20 market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the transaction. Such
repurchases were not part of a publicly announced plan or program.

Effective June 27, 2011, the Company repurchased and retired a total of 85,200 shares of the Company’s common stock at a

price of $6.50 per share for a total cost of $554. Such shares were repurchased under a stock purchase agreement with the
Company’s former Chief Executive Officer at a price below the $6.96 market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the
transaction. Such repurchases were not part of a publicly announced plan or program.

One of the Company’s directors received a consulting fee and software license fees for development and use of the Company’s

premium administration application software. Under this arrangement, the Company incurred a fee of $181 for the year ended
December 31, 2011. Effective June 30, 2011, all rights to the software license were assigned to the Company in exchange for a one-
time payment of $50. Such payment was made to the Company’s director who developed and licensed the software to the Company.
The related software license and consulting agreements were terminated coincident with this exchange.

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 22 — Condensed Financial Information of HCI Group, Inc.

Condensed financial information of HCI Group, Inc. is as follows:

Balance Sheets

December 31,

2013

2012

$ 87,715 $

56
6,581
214,958
1,119
1,782
5,705

6,317
—
—
140,563
1,293
2,379
916

$317,916 $151,468

1,863 $
5,888
19
126,932
22,693

727
415
42
—
29,031

157,395
160,521

30,215
121,253

$317,916 $151,468

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Fixed-maturity securities, available for sale, at fair value
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value
Investment in subsidiaries
Property and equipment, net
Income tax receivable
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Deferred income taxes, net
Dividends payable
Long-term debt
Due to related parties

Total liabilities
Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Statements of Income

Years Ended December 31,

8 $

2013

2012

84 $
(2)
864
(3,607)
(4,865)

—
144
—
(2,812)

2011
75
—
66
—
(2,428)

(7,526)
2,863

(2,660)
750

(2,287)
846

(4,663)
70,225

(1,910)
32,067

(1,441)
11,405

$65,562 $30,157 $ 9,964

Net investment income
Net realized loss on investments
Other income
Interest expense
Operating expenses

Loss before income tax benefit and equity in income of subsidiaries
Income tax benefit

Net loss before equity in income of subsidiaries
Equity in income of subsidiaries

Net income

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Statements of Cash Flows

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating

$ 65,562

$ 30,157

$ 9,964

Years Ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

2,362
2
1,000
(70,225)
(914)

237
—
788
(32,067)
763

27
—
214
(11,405)
(83)

—
(348)
1,488
(1,957)
10,489

(2,379)
84
(1,051)
(1,605)
5,314

241

8,389

—
—
—
(668)
—
6,000
(24,056)

2,074
—
—
(900)
—
—
(16,400)

597
(1,001)
1,136
—
(6,338)

(7,819)

—
(64)
(6,835)
(262)
361
4,000
(5,735)

(8,535)

(18,724)

(15,226)

—
(30,886)
(10,902)
—
—
—
143,250
(4,770)
1,060

20,082
—
(8,561)
283
11,869
—
—
(35)
1,161

—
(1,887)
(3,827)
564
—
11,307
—
—
265

97,752

24,799

6,422

81,398
6,317

6,316
1

$ 87,715

$ 6,317

(415)
416

activities:

Stock-based compensation
Net realized investment loss
Depreciation and amortization
Equity in income of subsidiaries
Deferred income taxes
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Income taxes receivable
Other assets
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Income taxes payable
Due to related parties

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities:

Redemption of short-term investments
Purchase of fixed-maturity securities
Purchase of equity securities
Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from sales of equity securities
Dividends received from subsidiary
Investment in subsidiaries

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock
Repurchases of common stock
Dividends paid to stockholders
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, net of costs
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Debt issuance costs paid
Tax benefits on stock-based compensation

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Table of Contents

HCI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

Note 23 — Subsequent Events

On January 23, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.275 per common share. The

dividends are scheduled for payment on March 21, 2014 to stockholders of record on February 21, 2014.

On February 4, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors fixed April 1, 2014 as the cancellation date for the conversion rights on

the Company’s 7% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock . As such, the record holders of the Series A Preferred will no
longer have conversion rights on and after April 1, 2014. On February 27, 2014, the Company voluntarily delisted its Series A
Preferred from the NASDAQ Capital Market.

100

Table of Contents

ITEM 9 – Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

ITEM 9A – Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer,

conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual
Report (December 31, 2013). Our disclosure controls and procedures are intended to ensure that the information we are required to
disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period

covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting (as defined in

Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records

that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

101

Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Our management, with the
participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the 2013 consolidated financial

statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of their audit, has issued an attestation report, included herein,
on our internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During our most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have

materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B – Other Information

None.

102

Table of Contents

ITEM 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Code of Ethics

PART III

We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to all of our employees and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer). We have posted the text of our code of ethics to our
Internet web site: www.hcigroup.com. Select “Investors” from the left and then select “Corporate Governance” and then “Code of
Conduct.” We intend to disclose any change to or waiver from our code of ethics by posting such change or waiver to our Internet
web site within the same section as described above.

The other information required under this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our
annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our
fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

ITEM 11 – Executive Compensation

The information required under this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our annual
meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal
year ended December 31, 2013.

ITEM 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans are summarized under Part II – Item 5 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 13 – Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

103

Table of Contents

ITEM 14 – Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for services related to the year ended December 31, 2013 provided by Dixon

Hughes Goodman, LLP, our principal accountant, and Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA, the Company’s principal accountant for the year
ended December 31, 2012:

Audit fees (a)
All other fees (b)

2013
$262
235

2012
$190
58

$497

$248

(a) Audit Fees represent fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of our
quarterly financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and audit services provided in connection with
other statutory and regulatory filings. Of the amount for the year ended December 31, 2013, $258 related to services provided by
Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP.

(b) All Other Fees represent fees billed for services provided to us not otherwise included in the category above, which are primarily
fees related to our senior note offerings completed in January 2013 and December 2013 and our follow-on common stock
offering in 2012. Of the amount for the year ended December 31, 2013, $162 related to services provided by Dixon Hughes
Goodman, LLP.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all 2013 engagements and fees for services provided by our principal accountant.

Other information required under this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our annual
meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal
year ended December 31, 2013.

104

Table of Contents

ITEM 15 – Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits

PART IV

(1)

Consolidated Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form
10-K.

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules:

Any supplemental information we are required to file with respect to our property and casualty insurance operations is included

in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K or is not applicable.

(3)

Exhibits: See the exhibit listing set forth below:

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

3.1

3.1.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

4.3

DESCRIPTION

Articles of Incorporation, with amendments. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation designating the rights, preferences and limitations of Series B
Junior Participating Preferred Stock. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed October 18, 2013.

Bylaws. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Form of common stock certificate. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form
10-Q filed November 7, 2013.

Supplement No. 1, dated as of January 17, 2013, to the Indenture, dated as of January 17, 2013, between HCI
Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice, Inc.) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 8-K filed January 17,
2013.

Form of 8.00% Senior Note due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.2). Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly
numbered exhibit to our Form 8-K filed January 17, 2013.

105

Table of Contents

4.4

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

4.10

10.1

10.2**

10.3

10.4**

Indenture, dated as of January 17, 2013, between HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice, Inc.) and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Amendment No. 1 to our
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-185228) filed December 10, 2012.

Form of Subordinated Indenture. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to Amendment No.
1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-185228) filed December 10, 2012.

Form of 7% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock certificate. Incorporated by reference to the
correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q (File No. 333-150513) filed August 7, 2013.

See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 of this report for provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and our Bylaws, as
amended, defining certain rights of security holders. See also Exhibits 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 defining certain rights of the
recipients of stock options and other equity-based awards.

Rights Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2013, between HCI Group, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC, which includes as Exhibit A thereto a summary of the terms of the Series B Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, as Exhibit B thereto the Form of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C thereto the Summary of Rights to Purchase
Preferred Shares. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed October 18, 2013.

Indenture, dated December 11, 2013, between HCI Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
(including Global Note). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed December 12, 2013.

Excess of Loss Retrocession Contract, effective June 1, 2012, issued to Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company, Ltd.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed August 13, 2012.

Executive Agreement dated May 1, 2007 between HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice, Inc.) and
Richard R. Allen. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-150513), originally filed April 30, 2008, effective July 24, 2008, as amended.

Reimbursement Contract effective June 1, 2013 between Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company
and the State Board of Administration which administers the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. Incorporated by
reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Executive Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2011 between HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners
Choice, Inc.) and Paresh Patel. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q
filed August 12, 2011.

106

Table of Contents

10.5**

10.6**

10.7**

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.17

10.18

HCI Group, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our
Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice, Inc.) 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Incorporated by
reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 29, 2008.

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-150513), originally filed April 30, 2008, effective July 24, 2008, as
amended.

Addendum No. 1 to Reimbursement Contract effective June 1, 2013 between Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty
Insurance Company and the State Board of Administration which administers the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund.
Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Catastrophe Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (1). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Catastrophe Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (2). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Form of indemnification agreement for our officers and directors. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly
numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 12, 2009.

Catastrophe Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (3). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

107

Table of Contents

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.23

10.24**

10.25

10.26

10.27**

Catastrophe Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (4). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Per Occurrence Excess Of Loss Reinsurance contract dated June 1, 2012 by Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty
Insurance Company, Inc. and subscribing reinsurers. Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August
14, 2012.

Catastrophe Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (6). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Catastrophe Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (5). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Executive Employment Agreement dated March 8, 2012 between HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners
Choice, Inc.) and Scott R. Wallace. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-
K filed March 30, 2012.

Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice Property &
Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (1). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to
a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-
Q filed August 7, 2013.

Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice Property &
Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (2). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to
a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-
Q filed August 7, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated April 20, 2012 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to Scott R. Wallace. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27
of our Form 10-Q filed May 14, 2012.

108

Table of Contents

10.28**

10.29**

10.30**

10.31

10.32

10.33

10.34**

10.35**

10.36**

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 8, 2012 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 30,000 shares of restricted common stock to Richard R. Allen. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of
our Form 8-K filed May 10, 2012.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 8, 2012 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 30,000 shares of restricted common stock to Sanjay Madhu. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of
our Form 8-K filed May 10, 2012.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 8, 2012 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 20,000 shares of restricted common stock to Andrew L. Graham. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30
of our Form 8-K filed May 10, 2012.

PR-M Non-Bonus Assumption Agreement, dated September 20, 2012, by and between Homeowners Choice Property &
Casualty Insurance Company and Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
of our Form 8-K filed September 25, 2012.

Endorsement No. 1 to the Per Occurrence Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract Effective June 1, 2012 by
Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. and subscribing reinsurers. Incorporated by
reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2013.

Working Layer Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract effective June 1, 2013 issued to Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company by subscribing reinsurers. Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant
to a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form
10-Q filed May 9, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 400,000 shares of restricted common stock to Paresh Patel. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of
our Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock to Sanjay Madhu. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of
our Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock to George Apostolou. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36
of our Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

109

Table of Contents

10.37**

10.38**

10.39**

10.40**

10.41

10.42

10.43

10.44

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock to Harish Patel. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of our
Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock to Gregory Politis. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 of
our Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock to Anthony Saravanos. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39
of our Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 16, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. (formerly known as Homeowners Choice,
Inc.) issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock to Martin Traber. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of
our Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013.

Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice Property &
Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (3). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to
a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-
Q filed August 7, 2013.

Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice Property &
Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (4). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to
a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-
Q filed August 7, 2013.

Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract, effective: June 1, 2013, issued to, Homeowners Choice Property &
Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. by subscribing reinsurers (5). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to
a request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-
Q filed August 7, 2013.

Reinstatement Premium Protection Agreement effective June 1, 2013 by Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty
Insurance Company, Inc. and subscribing reinsurers (1). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q
filed August 7, 2013.

110

Table of Contents

10.45

10.46

10.47

10.48

10.49

10.50

10.51

10.52**

10.53**

Reinstatement Premium Protection Agreement effective June 1, 2013 by Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty
Insurance Company, Inc. and subscribing reinsurers (2). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q
filed August 7, 2013.

Reinstatement Premium Protection Agreement effective June 1, 2013 by Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty
Insurance Company, Inc. and subscribing reinsurers (3). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q
filed August 7, 2013.

Endorsement No 1, effective June 1, 2013, to Per Occurrence Excess of Loss Reinsurance contract dated June 1, 2013
by Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. and subscribing reinsurers. Incorporated by
reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Excess of Loss Retrocession Contract, effective June 1, 2013, issued to Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company Ltd.
by subscribing reinsurers, including Oxbridge Reinsurance Limited (aggregate). Incorporated by reference to the
correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Excess of Loss Retrocession Contract, effective June 1, 2013, issued to Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company Ltd.
by subscribing reinsurers, including Oxbridge Reinsurance Limited (working layer). Incorporated by reference to the
correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Excess of Loss Retrocession Contract, effective June 1, 2012, issued to Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company Ltd.
by Moksha Re SPC Ltd. (aggregate). Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form
10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Endorsement No. 1 Excess of Loss Retrocession Contract, effective June 1, 2013, issued to Claddaugh Casualty
Insurance Company Ltd. by Moksha Re SPC Ltd. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to
our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated August 29, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. issued 10,000 shares of restricted
common stock to Anthony Saravanos. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 of our Form 8-K filed August 29, 2013.

Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 12, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. issued 24,000 shares of restricted
common stock to Wayne Burks. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our Form 8-K filed November 13, 2013.

111

Table of Contents

10.54**

10.55

10.56

23.1

23.2

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 12, 2013 whereby HCI Group, Inc. issued 24,000 shares of restricted
common stock to James J. Macchiarola. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of our Form 8-K filed
November 13, 2013.

Purchase Agreement, dated December 5, 2013, by and between HCI Group, Inc. and JMP Securities LLC, as
representative of the several initial purchasers named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form
8-K filed December 6, 2013.

Prepaid Forward Contract, dated December 5, 2013 and effective as of December 11, 2013, between HCI Group, Inc.
and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed December
12, 2013.

Code of Conduct of HCI Group, Inc. Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to our Form
10-Q filed August 7, 2013.

Subsidiaries of HCI Group, Inc.

Consent of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP.

Consent of Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA.

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF

XBRL Definition Linkbase.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

** Management contract or compensatory plan.

112

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this

report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

March 12, 2014

HCI GROUP, INC.

By /s/ Paresh Patel

Paresh Patel, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of The Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following

persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

March 12, 2014

By /s/ Paresh Patel

March 12, 2014

Paresh Patel, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of The Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)

By /s/ Richard R. Allen

Richard R. Allen, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

By /s/ George Apostolou

George Apostolou, Director

By /s/ Wayne Burks

Wayne Burks, Director

By /s/ James Macchiarola

James Macchiarola, Director

By /s/ Sanjay Madhu

Sanjay Madhu, Director

By /s/ Harish M. Patel

Harish M. Patel, Director

By /s/ Gregory Politis

Gregory Politis, Director

By /s/ Anthony Saravanos

Anthony Saravanos, Director

By /s/ Martin A. Traber

Martin A. Traber, Director

A signed original of this document has been provided to HCI Group, Inc. and will be retained by HCI Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

113

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:

HCI GROUP, INC.

Subsidiaries

Wholly-owned subsidiaries of HCI Group, Inc.

Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
Homeowners Choice Managers, Inc.
Claddaugh Casualty Insurance Company Ltd.
Cypress Property Management Services, Inc.
Cypress Claims Services, Inc.
Cypress Tech Development Company, Inc.
Exzeo USA, Inc.
HCI Technical Resources, Inc.
Greenleaf Capital LLC (formerly known as HCI Holdings LLC)
Homeowners Choice Assurance Company, Inc.
Omega Insurance Agency, Inc.
Southern Administration, Inc.

Wholly-owned subsidiary of Homeowners Choice
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.

HCPCI Holdings LLC

Wholly-owned subsidiary of HCI Technical Resources, Inc.

Unthink Technologies Private Limited

Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Greenleaf Capital LLC
Gators on the Pass Holdings, LLC
John’s Pass Marina Investment Holdings, LLC
JP Beach Holdings, LLC
Pass Investment Holdings, LLC
TI Marina Company, Inc.
Treasure Island Restaurant Company, Inc.
TV Investment Holdings LLC
Silver Springs Property Investments LLC

Wholly-owned subsidiary of Cypress Tech Development Company, Inc.

Exzeo Software Private Limited

Exhibit 21

State or Sovereign Power

of Incorporation

Florida
Florida
Bermuda
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Alabama
Florida
Florida

State or Sovereign Power

of Incorporation

Florida

State or Sovereign Power

of Incorporation
India

State or Sovereign Power

of Incorporation

Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida

State or Sovereign Power

of Incorporation
India

Consent of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-180322 and 333-185228) on Form S-3 and
registration statements (Nos. 333-154436 and 333-184227) on Form S-8 of HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated
March 12, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which reports
appear in HCI Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP
DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN, LLP
Clearwater, Florida
March 12, 2014

Consent of Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Exhibit 23.2

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Form S-3 No. 333-180322, and No. 333-185228 as
supplemented from time to time and Form S-8 No. 333-154436 and No. 333-184227) of our report dated March 12, 2014, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of HCI Group, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013.

/s/ Hacker, Johnson & Smith PA
HACKER, JOHNSON & SMITH PA
Tampa, Florida
March 12, 2014

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 31.1

I, Paresh Patel, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HCI Group, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

March 12, 2014

/s/ PARESH PATEL
Paresh Patel

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this document has been provided to HCI Group, Inc. and will be retained by HCI Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 31.2

I, Richard R. Allen, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HCI Group, Inc.;

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

March 12, 2014

/s/ RICHARD R. ALLEN
Richard R. Allen

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this document has been provided to HCI Group, Inc. and will be retained by HCI Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Exhibit 32.1

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of HCI Group, Inc. (the

“Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2014 (the “Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this document has been provided to HCI Group, Inc. and will be retained by HCI Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ PARESH PATEL
Paresh Patel
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2014

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Exhibit 32.2

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of HCI Group, Inc. (the

A signed original of this document has been provided to HCI Group, Inc. and will be retained by HCI Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ RICHARD R. ALLEN
Richard R. Allen
Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2014