Quarterlytics / Energy / Oil & Gas Equipment & Services / Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

hlx · NYSE Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker hlx
Exchange NYSE
Sector Energy
Industry Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Employees 2313
← All annual reports
FY2005 Annual Report · Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Contents 

Chairman’s  Review…………………….………………………………………………….2 

Review  of  Operations…………………………………………………………………...4 

Introduction………………………………………………………………………...4 

Review  of Projects……………………………………………………………......4 

Corporate  Governance……………………………………………………………...…..8 

Directors’  Report……………………………………………………………………….15 

Auditor’s  Independence  Declaration………………………………………………….21 

Independent Audit Report……………………………………………………………….22 

Directors’ Declaration…………………………………………………………………....24 

Statement of Financial Position………………………………………………….……..25 

Statement  of  Financial  Performance……………………………………..……….…26 

Statement of Cashflows…………………………………………………………...…….27 

Notes to the Financial Statements………………………………………………..……28 

Shareholding  Information…………………………………………………………….…47 

Tenement  Schedule………………………………………………………………..……49 

Corporate  Directory…………………………………………………………………….52 

Annual Report 2005 |  1 

 
 
 
“the year has been a positive one, in 
which the Company has made substantial 
progress in its exploration activities..” 

Chairman’s Review 

Dear Shareholder 

I  am  pleased  to  present  this  year’s  Annual  Report, 
the  twentieth  in  the  history  of  Helix  Resources 
Limited. 

Overall,  the  year  has  been  a  positive  one,  in  which 
the  Company  has  made  substantial  progress  in  its 
exploration  activities  for  gold,  copper,  nickel  and 
diamonds. Commencing in January, we flew the first 
detailed aeromagnetic survey over the north eastern 
section of the Mt Venn layered intrusion in Western 
Australia. The results of this survey produced some 
significant  magnetic  anomalies  which  were  further 
evaluated in May 
ground-
using 
b
e 
n
r
o
electromagnetic 
(EM) techniques. 
This  EM  survey 
i d e n t i f i e d 
m a s s i v e 
sulphide conductors at relatively shallow depths and 
a  program  of  outcrop  gossan  sampling  confirmed 
highly  anomalous  copper  and  nickel  mineralisation 
up  to  24%  Cu  and  1.5%  Ni.  In  June,  the  Company 
carried out a 3,000 metre reverse circulation drilling 
program  made  up  of  24  holes  drilled  into  the  north 
eastern  ultramafic  sequence. 
In  addition  more 
ground  was  applied  for  to  the  south  providing  Helix 
with  almost  80%  coverage  of  the  Mt  Venn  layered 
intrusion. 

The  results  of  our  first  drilling  program  at  Mt  Venn 
were encouraging; drilling confirmed the presence of 
extensive  sulphide  accumulations,  with  best  assay 
results from drill hole MVRC 10 which intersected 2 
metres  of  1.2%  Nickel  from  a  4  metre  wide  zone 
grading  1.3%  Copper.  Most  holes  contained  broad 
widths  of  geochemically  anomalous  copper  and 
nickel  and  the  Company  is  now  preparing  a  further 
exploration program over the entire layered intrusion 
aimed  at  identifying  potential  structural  trap  sites 
containing sulphide accumulations. 

In South Australia, a new joint venture with Minotaur 
Exploration  Ltd  over  the  Tunkillia  gold  project  was 
signed  in  March  of  this  year.  The  Tunkillia  project 
currently  contains  an  inferred  resource  of  10.5  Mt 
grading  2.2  g/t  (approximately  730,000  ounces). 
Under  the  terms  of  the  joint  venture  Minotaur  can 
earn  a  51%  interest  in  the  project  by  spending  the 
next  $5.0  million  on  the  project.  There  is  also  a 
minimum  requirement  for  Minotaur  to  spend  $1.0 
million before the end of 2006.  

Under  a  generative  alliance  between  Minotaur  and 
Oxiana  Limited,  Minotaur  may  introduce  Oxiana  to 
the  Tunkillia  project,  providing  there  is  an  indicated 

2 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

resource estimation greater than 1 million ounces  of 
gold.  Minotaur  and  Oxiana  could  then  earn  an 
additional 24.5% (total 75.5%) equity by completing 
a  pre-feasibility  study  on  such  a  project  in  an 
additional 2 year timeframe. 

Exploration  activities  at  Tunkillia  by  Minotaur  are 
currently 
from  drilling 
in  progress  and  results 
programs should be available before year end. 

In  April,  the  Company  carried  out  drilling  at  its 
Glenburgh  gold  project  in  the  Gascoyne  region  of 
Western  Australia.  Drilling  has  now  confirmed  a 
JORC resource of 1.1 Mt grading 3.1g/t for 108,000 
ounces  of  gold. 
The  Company 
focussing 
is 
f u r
t h e r 
e x p l o r a t i o n 
around  defining 
a d d i t i o n a l 
r e s o u r c e 

ounces near the Apollo resource. 

The West Pilbara Diamond Project is being explored 
on  behalf  of  Helix  under  an  earning-in  agreement 
with  DeBeers  Australia  Exploration  Limited 
(DeBeers), whereby DeBeers can earn 51% interest 
in  the  project  by  spending  $3.0  million  before  June 
2006.  DeBeers  has  outlined  a  potential  new 
diamond  province  in  the  West  Pilbara  region,  with 
two  kimberlites 
located  on  Helix  Exploration 
Licences.  Both  kimberlites  contain  micro-diamonds 
and  occur  as  dyke  complexes.  The  Blacktop 
kimberlite,  which  straddles  both  a  joint  venture 
Exploration  Licence  and  DeBeers’ own ground, has 
had one initial bulk sample taken from the DeBeers 
Exploration Licence. The bulk sample has produced 
approximately  5  carats  of  diamonds,  and  further 
work including bulk sampling is now required on the 
the  Helix 
Blacktop  kimberlite  extensions  onto 
tenements. The other kimberlite, Clurrie, situated on 

R. Vittino, R. Mosig, J. den Dryver, Tunkillia 2004 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chairman’s Review 

Helix tenements, remains untested. The Company is 
encouraged  by  the  significant  early  success  in 
finding  kimberlites  and  diamonds  in  this  new  and 
exciting  province  and  looks  forward  to  the  next 
exploration program. 

Helix reported a loss of $1,297,895 during the year. 
Cash  reserves  available  are  $1.6  million  and  the 
Company  continues 
its  determined  exploration 
efforts throughout Western Australia. 

In  August  of  this  year,  Mr  Michael  Wilson  took  up 
the  position  as  Exploration  Manager 
the 
Company replacing Mr Tony Martin who retired after 
17 years employment. I would like to thank Tony on 
behalf  of  all  at  Helix  for  his  tremendous  assistance 
and  I  would  also  like  to  welcome  Michael  to  the 
management 
to  his 
contributions.  

team  and 

forward 

look 

for 

Mt Venn Field Camp 2005 

The staff and Board of Helix look forward to making 
2006 a significant year for the Company. 

At the last Annual General Meeting of the Company 
in November 2005, Mr Riccardo Vittino joined me as 
an executive Director and Messrs Greg Wheeler and 
John den Dryver joined as non executive Directors. I 
would  like  to  also  thank  them  and  the  rest  of  the 
Helix staff for their valuable contributions during this 
important year. 

Robert W Mosig 
Executive Chairman 

Helix Project Locations 

Annual Report 2005 |  3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 

INTRODUCTION 

Exploration  activities  focussed  on  the  Mt  Venn 
layered intrusion - Eastern Goldfields, the Glenburgh 
gold project,- Gascoyne region and the Isolated Hill 
gold and base metals project - Eastern Goldfields in 
Western Australia. 

Activities  at  the  Highway  nickel  laterite  project,  the 
Tunkillia  gold  project,  the  West  Pilbara  diamond 
project and the Loongana base metals and platinum 
group metals (PGM) project were carried out by joint 
venture partners. 

On  platinum  group  metals,  Helix  retains  an  active 
interest  in  Australian  PGM  exploration  through  its 
Fifield  and  Munni  Munni  PGM  projects.  This  year 
has seen a depressed price for palladium, generally 
below USD$200 an ounce. The Company maintains 
a continuous monitor on the potential for Australia to 
enter  the  PGM  production  arena,  and  plans  to 
undertake  a  longer  term  economic  study  on  the 
PGM market in 2006. 

Mt Venn Project – Western Australia 
Helix 80% - E38/1000 
Helix 100% - ELA 38/1476 and 1775. 

The  Mt  Venn  Project  is  situated  100km  east  of 
Laverton  W.A.,  on  the  edge  of  the  Great  Victorian 
Desert.  The  project  area  has  received  very  little 
exploration  activity  over  the  last  30  years  due  to  its 
location on an Aboriginal reserve. The last recorded 
work  on  the  project  was  carried 
out  by  Tasminex  N.L.  and 
Western  Mining  Corporation  in 
the  late  1960’s  and  early  1970’s 
respectively. 

In March of this year, an 8 square kilometre ground-
borne  electromagnetic  (EM)  survey  was  carried  out 
over a specific area of the intrusion where significant  
magnetic and geochemical anomalism was found to 
occur.  The  EM  survey  assisted  in  defining  two 
sulphide-rich horizons. The first was associated with 
the  basal  contact  of  the  intrusion  and  the  second 
was  located  up  sequence,  along  the  contact  of  a 
gabbro with a coarse-grained pyroxenite. 

Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling commenced in late 
June with a total of 24 holes drilled for 3,031 metres 
targeting  selected  geochemical,  EM,  magnetic  and 
structural  features  along  6  kilometres  of  strike 
length. 

Best assay results were from hole MVRC 10, which 
intersected  2  metres  grading  1.2%  Nickel  from  a  4 
metre  wide  zone  grading  1.3%  Copper.  Most  drill 
holes  contained  broad  widths  of  geochemically 
anomalous  copper  and  nickel  varying  from  several 
metres up to 60 metres in drilled widths. Evidence of 
weak platinum group metal anomalism was detected 
in only one drill hole specifically targeted to intersect 
the  titaniferous  magnetite  portion  of  the  Mt  Venn 
intrusion.  

By placing these assays into the context of a layered 
ultramafic intrusion, the Company is encouraged by 
these  first  pass  drilling  results.  The  Mt  Venn 
Intrusion has now been confirmed to have extensive 
sulphide  accumulation  containing  well  developed 

Mt  Venn  appears  to  have  some 
characteristics of a layered mafic/
ultramafic 
intrusion  and  was 
secured  by  Helix  to  examine  its 
potential  to  host  PGM  and  base 
metal  deposits.  After  several 
years  of  negotiations  to  support 
the  granting  of  an  Exploration 
finally 
Licence, 
commenced 
the 
project in late 2004. 

the  Company 

fieldwork  on 

Initial  work  at 
the  Mt  Venn 
Project  involved  the  flying  of  a 
detailed  magnetic  survey  over 
the entire intrusion in early 2005. 
Follow-up 
activities 
ground 
included  a  mapping  and  outcrop 
sampling  program  over 
the 
western extent of the outcropping 
intrusion  (refer 
portion  of 
Figure  1).  This  mapping  and 
sampling  identified  a  series  of 
gabbroic  and  pyroxenitic  units 
with  extensive  surface  gossan 
development. 

the 

4 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

Figure 1: Mt Venn Project Significant Drilling Results 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 

copper and nickel anomalism.  

Future  exploration  will  focus  on  the  identification  of 
likely  structural  trap  sites,  where  economic  levels  of 
copper  and  nickel  concentrations  may  occur  in  the 
untested portions of the Mt Venn intrusion.  

Glenburgh Project – Western Australia 
Helix 100%  

During  the  year,  the  Company  carried  out  new  ore 
resource estimations and a further drilling program.  

In  May,  Resource  Evaluations  Pty  Ltd  calculated  a 
new  JORC  compliant  resource  for  the  project.  The 
new resource included additional holes drilled by Helix 
in  2003-04  that  intersected  high  grade  extensions  of 
the Apollo lode. An inferred resource of 1.1Mt at 3.1g/t 
for  108,000oz  was  estimated  using  a  grade  cut  off  of 
1g/t,  whilst  the  estimation  also  took  into  account 
minimum  mining  widths  for  ore  panels.  At  the  Apollo 
Prospect, 632,000 t grading 3.4g/t for 68,500 oz were 
estimated.  This  is  a  significant  improvement  from 
previous  resource  calculations,  with  a  60%  grade 
increase  and  20%  more  ounces  at  Apollo.  Previous 
resource  calculations  had  effectively  smeared  the 
orebody  by  using  a lower 0.5g/t cutoff. The Company 
considers  that  the  new  resource  estimation  better 
reflects  the  high  grade  nature  of  the  Glenburgh 
mineralisation. 

Additionally,  a  2,000  metre  RAB  drilling  program  was 
completed  over a series of  geochemical anomalies at 
the  Mustang  Prospect,  immediately  east  of  the  main 
Apollo Prospect. This area is covered by a thin veneer 
of  alluvial  soils  masking  the  geochemical  response 
noted  elsewhere  on  the  project.  An  earlier  shallow 
vacuum drilling program in 2004 successfully identified 
numerous gold anomalies from the palaeo-soil surface 
located  1-2  metres  below  the  cover.  The  RAB  drilling 

program  was  designed 
the  weathered 
basement  below  these  anomalies  to  a  depth  of 
approximately 30 metres.  

test 

to 

The  program  highlighted  a  number  of  significant  plus 
1g/t gold intersections including 8m at 3.8g/t and 7m at 
2.1g/t over a 1.5 kilometre strike length (refer to Figure 
2).  The  results  show  potential  for  at  least  two  new 
zones  of  mineralisation,  both  with  geochemical 
signatures similar to that of the Apollo Prospect.  

Future  work  will  concentrate  on  defining  the  new 
zones of anomalous geochemistry with RC drilling and 
confirming the possibility for along strike repetitions of 
the  shallow  dipping  high  grade  Apollo-style  lodes 
under shallow cover.  

Perry Creek Base Metals Project - 
Western Australia 
Helix 100%  

is  a 
The  Perry  Creek  copper-lead-zinc  project 
conceptual base metals target situated in the Edmund 
Basin,  Western  Australia.  The  Edmund  Basin  is  an 
extensive 
intracratonic  shale-sandstone-carbonate 
basin  of  early  Mesoproterzoic  age  which  forms  the 
lower  part  of  the  Bangemall  Superbasin  (refer  Figure 
3). 

The  Perry  Creek  Project  is  an  attractive  target  for 
sediment  hosted  base  metals.  The  project  area 
contains  favourable  rock  types  including  shale  and 
dolomites which are situated within an intracratonic rift 
setting.  In  addition,  its  age  of  1.6Ga  is  comparable  to 
the Mt Isa and MacArthur River base metal deposits. 

The  primary  target  in  the  project  area  is  sulphidic 
carbonaceous shale of the Blue Billy Formation which 
overlies  a  thick  clastic  wedge  of  conglomerate  and 
(Prairie  Downs  and  Gooragoora 
sandstone 

Figure 2: Glenburgh plan and long section showing significant results 

Annual Report 2005 |  5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 

Formations respectively). 

Previous  explorers  in  the  project 
area  were  Geopeko  (1983-85)  and 
P a s m i n c o  
( 1 9 9 2 - 9 4 ) .   B o t h 
companies  carried  out  primary 
exploration  for  Mt  Isa  style  Pb-Zn 
mineralization and for Jillewarra-type 
Cu-Pb-Au  occurrences  using 
aeromagnetic studies combined with 
geochemical  sampling.  Several 
anomalous localities were defined in 
areas  of  unexposed  Blue  Billy 
Formation. 

Helix  will  carry  out  further  sampling 
and  geophysical  studies  prior  to 
drilling any defined targets in 2006. 

Lake  Everard  Project  –  South 
Australia 
Helix 100%,  
Minotaur Exploration earning 51% 

A  Joint  Venture  with  Minotaur 
Exploration Ltd (“Minotaur”) over the 
Lake  Everard  Project  was  signed  in 
the  first  quarter  of  2005.  Under  the 
terms  of  the  Joint  Venture,  Minotaur  can  earn  a  51% 
interest in all tenements by spending $5.0 million over 
four  years,  of  which  $1.0  million  is  a  minimum 
commitment to be spent before the end of 2006. 

Under  a  proposed  generative  alliance  between 
Minotaur  and  Oxiana  Limited,  Minotaur  can  introduce 
Oxiana  to  the  project.  Should  Oxiana  enter  into  the 
joint  venture,  then  Minotaur/Oxiana  can  earn  an 
additional  24.5% (total  75.5%) equity  by completing  a 
pre-feasibility  study  on  a  project  which  contains  an 
Indicated Resource of at least 1 million ounces gold.  

Minotaur  has  taken  over  management  of  the  project 
and  subsequently  carried  out  a  full  review  of  all 
geophysical  and  drilling  data,  identifying  numerous 
priority targets for their 2005 field campaign. Minotaur 
has  conducted  an  infill  gravity  survey  and  a  close-
spaced  calcrete  sampling  program  over  several 
regional targets. In addition, a regional Aircore drilling 
program has commenced to test gold and copper/gold 
targets over the entire tenement package, and an RC/
diamond  drilling  program  will  be  carried  out  to  test 
geophysical  anomalies  and  structural  targets  within 
the  20  square  kilometre  Tunkillia  gold  in  calcrete 
anomaly.  

West Pilbara Diamond Project – Western Australia 
Helix  100%,  De  Beers  Australia  Exploration  Limited 
earning 51% 

The Helix  West Pilbara Diamond Project comprises 11 
tenements,  100%  owned  by  Helix,  covering  nearly 
2,000  square  kilometres  and  situated  to  the  south  of 
the  Company’s  Munni  Munni  PGM  project.  DeBeers 
Australia Exploration (DBAE) may earn a 51% interest 
in diamonds by spending AUD$3 million by June 2006. 

6 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

Figure 3: Perry Creek project Stratigraphic Interpretation 

No  field  activities  were  carried  out  in  2005,  however, 
previous  reconnaissance  and  surface  sampling  by 
DBAE  resulted  in  the  discovery  of  two  kimberlites, 
Blacktop  and  Clurrie,  in  2004.  As  part  of  a  follow  up 
survey  three  micro-diamonds  were  recovered  from  a 
rock chip sample containing weathered kimberlite from 
the  Blacktop  area  (refer  to  Figure  4)  The  discovery  is 
immediately  adjacent  to  the  DBAE  Balmoral  Project 
tenements where a 32.85 tonne bulk sample produced 
89  macro  diamonds  totaling  4.17  carats  (-8.0  +  1.0 
mm fraction) from the Blacktop kimberlite dyke and sill 
complex.  A  further  46  diamonds  totalling  1.1  carats 
were also found in the tailings re-treatment audit of the 
bulk sample.  

located  on 

the  extension  of 

The kimberlite and micro-diamonds found on the Helix 
tenements  are 
the 
Blacktop  kimberlite  trend  found  on  DBAE’s  ground. 
DBAE’s drilling to date extends only to the boundary of 
the  Helix  tenements.  The  regional  geophysics  and 
surface loam sampling conducted by DBAE shows the 
complex  extends  for  at  least  another  1.5  kilometres 
into  Helix’s  ground  where  it  terminates  in  a  major 
regional fault.  

field  activities 

Earlier  this  year,  DBAE  advised  Helix  that  as  a  result 
of  a  reassessment  of  De  Beers’  global  exploration 
priorities, 
in  Australia  would  be 
substantially  reduced.  As  a  consequence  DBAE  and 
Helix are currently discussing a number of options with 
a view to ensure that the diamond exploration potential 
of  the  ground  held  by  both  parties  is  assessed 
thoroughly. 
Highway Nickel Project – Western Australia 
Helix 25%, Heron Resources Limited 75% 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Review of Operations 

Heron  Resources  have  notified  Helix  that  infill  RC 
drilling at the Highway resource, which stands at 96Mt 
at 0.74% Ni and 0.05% Co, is in progress. This drilling 
program  will  bring  the  resource  drill  spacing  down  to 
160  by  80  metres.  This  drilling  campaign  is  the  first 
step towards upgrading the status of the resource from 
Inferred to Indicated.  

resource 

The  Highway 
represents  a  significant 
siliceous  Nickel  laterite  resource  located  only  25 
kilometres  north  of  Heron’s  Goongarie  Hill  project 
where  INCO  has  entered  into  a  joint  venture  with 
Heron. 

the  Robe  River  where  it  crosses  the  Marra  Mamba 
and Brockman Iron Formations. The exploration target 
is  the  occurrence  of  channel  iron  deposits  (CID’s), 
accumulations  of  material  anomalously  high  in  iron 
that  have  concentrated  in  the  channels  and  become 
lithified.  

Today Rio Tinto is profitably mining CID’s from Mesa J 
at Robe River, some 20 km to the west.  

API  plans  to  conduct  programs  of  detailed  mapping 
and  sampling  to  define  the  CID’s  with  follow-up  drill 
testing of targets in the 2005/06 field season  

Yalleen Iron Ore Project – Western Australia 
Helix 100%,  API Management Pty Ltd earning 70% 

West Pilbara Base Metal Project –  
Western Australia 
Helix 100% 

The  Yalleen  Project  is  a  joint  venture  between  Helix 
and  API  Management  Pty  Ltd  (a  company  equally 
owned  by  Aquila  Resources  Ltd  and  AMCI  Holdings 
Australia  Pty  Ltd),  and  covers  an  area  of  633  square 
km  in  the  West  Pilbara  Region  of  Western  Australia 
(refer Figure 4).  

The terms of the joint venture are:  
• API will spend a total of $1.5 million over four years 
on exploration for iron ore to earn a 70% interest in the 
project,  and  may  elect  to  withdraw  from  the  project 
after spending a minimum of $150,000;  
•  Once  API  has  earned  its  70%  interest,  Helix  can 
elect  to  contribute  pro-rata  or  dilute  to  a  $0.50  per 
tonne royalty.  

The project area covers the south eastern extension of 

Figure 4: West Pilbara Project Locations 

The West Pilbara Base Metal Project covers the same 
area  as  the  DBAE  diamond  joint  venture  with  the 
the  Munni  Munni  project  area, 
addition  of 
approximately 75 kilometres south of Karratha WA.  

The tenement package covers a diverse range of rock 
types  from  sequences  of  the  Hamersley  Basin  in  the 
south,  through  Fortescue  Formation  volcanics  and 
sediments  to  Archaean  basement  in  the  north.  Aside 
from the PGM potential at Munni Munni, the region is 
considered  highly  prospective  for  gold  and  base 
metals.  Operating  nickel,  copper  and  iron  ore  mines 
the 
and  numerous  historic  workings  surround 
tenement package.  

As part of the DBAE diamond joint venture, a surface 
geochemical sample was collected by DBAE nearby to 
resulting  samples, 
each  diamond  sample.  The 
collected at approximate 5 square kilometre spacings, 
were  assayed  by  Helix  for  precious  and  base  metals. 
Results  have  highlighted  numerous  gold/PGM  and 
base  metal  anomalies  that  will  form  the  basis  for  a 
field  campaign  on  the  project  area  in  the  2005-2006 
field season. 

Narracoota Project – Western Australia 
Helix Resources Limited 90%  

The  Naracoota  project  lies  in  the  Peak  Hill  Goldfield 
100km  north  of  Meekatharra.  During  the  year  a 
regional  surface  geochemical  sampling  program  was 
carried  out  over  the  project  area.  A  total  of  834 
samples  of  coarse  lag  material  were  collected  at  800 
metre by 400 metre centres. The program outlined two 
significant  gold  anomalies.  These  gold  anomalies  are 
believed  to  be  associated  with  regional  west  north-
west  structures  on  the  northern  edge  of  a  large 
coincident  gravity  and  magnetic  feature,  the  Biluyin 
Anomaly,  where  historical  drilling  intersected  a  thick 
sequence  of  volcanic  breccias  buried  under  shallow 
colluvial sediments.  

Future  work  will be carried out in last quarter of 2005 
to  assess  the  Biluyin  breccia  system,  with  the  aim  of 
outlining  a  drilling  program  targeting  gold  and  base 
metal mineralisation associated with regional structural 
controls and associated alteration systems.   

Annual Report 2005 |  7 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

The Company is committed to implementing the highest standards of corporate governance.  In determining what those high standards 
should involve the Company has turned to the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best 
Practice  Recommendations.    The  Company  is  pleased  to  advise  that  the  Company’s  practices  are  largely  consistent  with  those  ASX 
guidelines.    As  consistency  with  the  guidelines  has  been  a  gradual  process,  where  the  Company  did  not  have  certain  policies  or 
committees  recommended  by  the  ASX  Corporate  Governance  Council  (the  Council)  in  place  during  the  reporting  period,  we  have 
identified such policies or committees. 

Where the Company’s corporate governance practices do not correlate with the practices recommended by the Council, the Company 
does not consider that the practices are appropriate for the Company due to the size of Company operations. 

To  illustrate  where  the  Company  has  addressed  each  of  the  Council’s  recommendations,  the  following  table  cross-references  each 
recommendation  with  sections  of  this  report.    The  table  does  not  provide  the  full  text  of  each  recommendation  but  rather  the  topic 
covered.    Details  of  all  of  the  recommendations  can  be  found  on  the  ASX  Corporate  Governance  Council’s  website  at  http://
www.asx.com.au/about/CorporateGovernance_AA2.shtm.   

Recommendation 

Recommendation 1.1  Functions of the Board and Management 

Recommendation 2.1  Independent Directors 

Recommendation 2.2  Independent Chairman 

Recommendation 2.3  Role of the Chairman and Chief Operating Officer 

Recommendation 2.4  Establishment of Nomination Committee 

Recommendation 2.5  Reporting on Principle 2 

Recommendation 3.1  Directors’ and Key Executives’ Code of Conduct 

Recommendation 3.2  Company Security Trading Policy 

Recommendation 3.3  Reporting on Principle 3 

Section 

1.1 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

2.3 

1.2, 1.4.6, 2.3.2 and the Direc-
tors’ Report 

1.1 

1.4.9 

1.1 and 1.4.9 

Recommendation 4.1  Attestations by Executive Chairman and Chief Operating  Officer 

1.4.11 

Recommendation 4.2  Establishment of Audit Committee 

Recommendation 4.3  Structure of Audit Committee 

Recommendation 4.4  Audit Committee Charter 

Recommendation 4.5  Reporting on Principle 4 

Recommendation 5.1  Policy for Compliance with Continuous Disclosure 

Recommendation 5.2  Reporting on Principle 5 

Recommendation 6.1  Communications Strategy 

Recommendation 6.2  Attendance of Auditor at General Meetings 

Recommendation 7.1  Policies on Risk Oversight and Management 

Recommendation 7.2  Attestations by Executive Chairman and Chief Operating Officer 

Recommendation 7.3  Reporting on Principle 7 

Recommendation 8.1  Evaluation of Board, Directors and Key Executives 

Recommendation 9.1  Remuneration Policies 

Recommendation 9.2  Establishment of Remuneration Committee 

2.1 

2.1.2 

2.1 

2.1 

1.4.4 

1.4.4 

1.4.8 

1.4.8 

2.1.3 

1.4.11 

2.1.3 

1.4.10 

2.2.4 

2.2 

Recommendation 9.3  Executive and Non-Executive Director Remuneration 

2.2.4.1 and 2.2.4.2 

Recommendation 9.4  Equity-Based Executive Remuneration 

Recommendation 9.5  Reporting on Principle 9 

Recommendation 10.1  Company Code of Conduct 

2.2.4.1 

2.2.2 and 2.2.4 

3 

8 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
Corporate Governance 

1. 

1.1 

Board of Directors 

Role of the Board 

The  Board’s  role  is  to  govern  the  Company  rather  than  to  manage  it.    In  governing  the  Company,  the  Directors  must  act  in  the  best 
interests of the Company as a whole.  It is the role of senior management to manage the Company in accordance with the direction and 
delegations of the Board  and the responsibility  of the Board to  oversee the activities  of  management  in carrying  out these  delegated 
duties.   

In carrying out its governance role, the main task of the Board is to drive the performance of the Company.  The Board must also ensure 
that  the  Company  complies  with  all  of  its  contractual,  statutory  and  any  other  legal  obligations,  including  the  requirements  of  any 
regulatory body.  The Board has the final responsibility for the successful operations of the Company.  

To assist the Board carry out its functions, it has developed a Code of Conduct to guide the Directors, the Executive Chairman, the Chief 
Operating Officer and other key executives in the performance of their roles.     

1.2 

Composition of the Board 

To  add  value  to  the  Company  the  Board  has  been  formed  so  that  it  has  effective  composition,  size  and  commitment  to  adequately 
discharge  it  responsibilities  and  duties.    The  names  of  the  Directors  and  their  qualifications  and  experience  are  stated  in  Directors’ 
Report  along  with  the  term  of  office  held  by  each  of  the  Directors.    Directors  are  appointed  based  on  the  specific  governance  skills 
required by the Company and on the independence of their decision-making and judgment.   

The  Company  recognises  the  importance  of  Non-Executive  Directors  and  the  external  perspective  and  advice  that  Non-Executive 
Directors can offer.  Mr J denDryver and Mr G Wheeler are Non-Executive Directors.  In addition to being Non-Executive Directors, they 
also meet the following criteria for independence adopted by the Company.  

An Independent Director is a Non-Executive Director and: 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

is  not  a  substantial  shareholder  of  the  Company  or  an  officer  of,  or  otherwise  associated  directly  with,  a  substantial 
shareholder of the Company; 

within the last three years has not been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member, or 
been a Director after ceasing to hold any such employment; 

within  the  last  three  years  has  not  been  a  principal  of  a  material  professional  adviser  or  a  material  consultant  to  the 
Company or another group member. Or an employee materially associated with the service provided; 

is not a material supplier or customer of the Company or another group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated 
directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer; 

has  no  material  contractual  relationship  with  the  Company  or  other  group  member  other  than  as  a  Director  of  the 
Company;  

has not served on the Board for a period which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the 
Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company; and 

is  free  from  any  interest  and  any  business  or  other  relationship  which  could,  or  could  reasonably  be  perceived  to, 
materially interfere with the Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company. 

1.3 

Responsibilities of the Board 

In general, the Board is responsible for, and has the authority to determine, all matters relating to the policies, practices, management 
and operations of the Company.  It is required to do all things that may be necessary to be done in order to carry out the objectives of the 
Company.   

Without intending to limit this general role of the Board, the principal functions and responsibilities of the Board include the following.   

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

Leadership of the Organisation:  overseeing the Company and establishing codes that reflect the values of the Company 
and guide the conduct of the Board. 

Strategy Formulation:  working with senior management to set and review the overall strategy and goals for the Company 
and ensuring that there are policies in place to govern the operation of the Company. 

Overseeing Planning Activities: overseeing the development of the Company’s strategic plan and approving that plan as 
well as the annual and long term budgets. 

Shareholder Liaison:  ensuring effective communications with shareholders through an appropriate communications policy 
and promoting participation at general meetings of the Company. 

Annual Report 2005 |  9 

 
 
Corporate Governance 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

Monitoring,  Compliance  and  Risk  Management:    overseeing  the  Company’s  risk  management,  compliance,  control  and 
accountability systems and monitoring and directing the financial and operational performance of the Company. 

Company Finances:  approving expenses in excess of those approved in the annual budget and approving and monitoring 
acquisitions, divestitures and financial and other reporting. 

Human  Resources:    appointing,  and,  where  appropriate,  removing  senior  management  as  well  as  reviewing  and 
monitoring the performance of senior management in their implementation of the Company’s strategy. 

Ensuring the Health, Safety and Well-Being of Employees:  in conjunction with the senior management team, developing, 
overseeing and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s occupational health and safety systems to ensure the well-
being of all employees. 

Delegation of Authority:  delegating appropriate powers to the Chief Operating Officer to ensure the effective day-to-day 
management of the Company and establishing and determining the powers and functions of the Committees of the Board. 

1.4 

Board Policies 

1.4.1  Conflicts of Interest 

Directors must: 

• 

• 

disclose to the Board actual or potential conflicts of interest that may or might reasonably be thought to exist between the 
interests of the Director and the interests of any other parties in carrying out the activities of the Company; and  

if  requested  by  the  Board,  within  seven  days  or  such  further  period  as  may  be  permitted,  take  such  necessary  and 
reasonable steps to remove any conflict of interest. 

If a Director cannot or is unwilling to remove a conflict of interest then the Director must, as per the Corporations Act, absent himself or 
herself from the room when discussion and/or voting occurs on matters about which the conflict relates.   

1.4.2  Commitments 

Each member of the Board is committed to spending sufficient time to enable them to carry out their duties as a Director of the Company. 

1.4.3  Confidentiality 

In accordance with legal requirements and agreed ethical standards, Directors and key executives of the Company have agreed to keep 
confidential, information received in the course of the exercise of their duties and will not disclose non-public information except where 
disclosure is authorised or legally mandated. 

1.4.4  Continuous Disclosure  

The Board has designated the Company Secretary as the person responsible for overseeing and coordinating disclosure of information 
to the ASX as well as communicating with the ASX.  In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules the Company immediately notifies the 
ASX of information: 

1. 

2. 

concerning the Company that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the 
Company’s securities; and 

that would, or would be likely to, influence persons who commonly invest in securities in deciding whether to acquire or 
dispose of the Company’s securities. 

Upon confirmation of receipt from the ASX, the Company posts all information disclosed in accordance with this policy on the Company’s 
website in an area accessible by the public. 

1.4.5  Education and Induction 

New  Directors  undergo  an  induction  process  in  which  they  are  given  a  full  briefing  on  the  Company.    Where  possible,  this  includes 
meetings  with  key  executives,  site  visits  of  key  operations,  an  induction  package  and  presentations.    Information  conveyed  to  new 
Directors include: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

details of the roles and responsibilities of a Director;  

formal policies on Director appointment as well as conduct and contribution expectations;  

details of all relevant legal requirements; 

access to a copy of the Board Charter; 

Guidelines on how the Board processes function; 

10 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
Corporate Governance 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

details of past, recent and likely future developments relating to the Board; 

background information on and contact information for key people in the organisation; 

an analysis of the Company;  

a  synopsis  of  the  current  strategic  direction  of  the  Company  including  a  copy  of  the  current  strategic  plan  and  annual 
budget; and 

a copy of the Constitution of the Company. 

In  order  to  achieve  continuing  improvement  in  Board  performance,  all  Directors  are  encouraged  to  undergo  continual  professional 
development.     

1.4.6 

Independent Professional Advice 

The  Board  collectively  and  each  Director  has  the  right  to  seek  independent  professional  advice  at  the  Company’s  expense,  up  to 
specified limits, to assist them to carry out their responsibilities.   

1.4.7  Related Party Transactions 

Related party transactions include any financial transaction between a Director and the Company and will be reported in writing to each 
Board meeting.  Unless there is an exemption under the Corporations Act from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval for the 
related party transaction, the Board cannot approve the transaction.  

1.4.8  Shareholder Communication 

The Company respects the rights of its shareholders and to facilitate the effective exercise of those rights the Company is committed to: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Communicating effectively with shareholders through releases to the market via ASX, the Company’s website, information 
mailed to shareholders and the general meetings of the Company; 

giving  shareholders  ready  access  to  balanced  and  understandable  information  about  the  Company  and  corporate 
proposals;  

making it easy for shareholders to participate in general meetings of the Company; and 

requesting the external auditor to attend the annual general meeting and be available to answer shareholder questions 
about the conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the auditor’s report.   

The Company also makes available a telephone number and email address for shareholders to make enquiries of the Company.   

1.4.9 

Trading in Company Shares 

The  Company  has  a  Share  Trading  Policy  under  which  Directors  and  certain  employees  and  their  associates  may  only  trade  in  the 
Company’s securities during the 30 days commencing immediately after each of the following (“trading window”): 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the release by the Company of its half-yearly results to the ASX;  

the release by the Company of its annual results to the ASX;  

the close of the general meeting of the Company; and 

the release by the Company of its Quarterly Reports to the ASX. 

In addition, consistent with the law, designated officers are prohibited from trading in the Company’s securities while in the possession of 
unpublished price sensitive information concerning the Company.  Unpublished price sensitive information is information regarding the 
Company, of which the market is not aware, that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the 
Company’s securities. 

Notice of an intention to trade must be given prior to trading in the Company’s securities as well as a confirmation that the person is not 
in possession of any unpublished price sensitive information.  The completion of any such trade by a Director must also be notified to the 
Company Secretary who in turn advises the ASX. 

1.4.10  Performance Review/Evaluation 

Each  year  the  Board  conducts  an  evaluation  of  its  performance.    The  evaluation  for  this  and  past  financial  years  was  conducted 
internally. The Board’s performance was measured against both qualitative and quantitative indicators.  The objective of this evaluation 
was to identify strengths and weaknesses and provide best practice corporate governance to the Company. In future years this process 
may carried out by an external consultant.   

Annual Report 2005 |  11 

 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance 

1.4.11  Attestations by Executive Chairman and Chief Operating Officer 

In accordance with the Board’s policy, the Executive Chairman and the Chief Operating Officer made the attestations recommended by 
the ASX Corporate Governance Council as to the Company’s financial condition prior to the Board signing this Annual Report. 

2. 

Board Committees 

2.1 

Audit Committee 

Due to the size and scale of operations of the Company, the full Board undertakes the role of the Audit Committee. Below is a summary 
of the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.  Further details are contained in the Audit Committee’s Charter. 

2.1.1  Role  

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting and overseeing the independence of 
the external auditors.   

2.1.2  Composition 

The Audit Committee consists of four members, being the full Board. All members can read and understand financial statements and are 
otherwise financially literate. The details of the member’s qualifications may be found in their Director Profiles in the Directors’ Report. 

The Audit Committee holds two meetings throughout a normal year and details of attendance of the members of the Audit Committee are 
contained in the Directors’ Report.  

2.1.3  Responsibilities 

The  Audit  Committee  reviews  the  audited  annual  and  half-yearly  financial  statements  and  any  reports  which  accompany  published 
financial statements before submission to the Board and recommends their approval.  

The Audit Committee also recommends to the Board the appointment of the external auditor and each year, reviews the appointment of 
the external auditor, their independence, the audit fee, and any questions of resignation or dismissal. 

The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing policies on risk oversight and management. 

2.2 

Remuneration Committee 

Due to the size and scale of operations of the Company, the full Board undertakes the role of the Remuneration Committee. 

2.2.1  Role 

The  role  of  the  Remuneration  Committee  is  to  assist  the  Board  in  fulfilling  its  responsibilities  in  respect  of  establishing  appropriate 
remuneration levels and incentive policies for employees. 

2.2.2  Composition 

The full Board comprises  the Remuneration Committee.  

The Remuneration Committee holds meetings as required throughout the year.  

2.2.3  Responsibilities 

The responsibilities of the Remuneration Committee include setting policies, terms and conditions of employment for senior executives’ 
remuneration,  reviewing  and  implementing  the  Company’s  incentive  schemes  and  superannuation  arrangements,  reviewing  the 
remuneration of both Executive and Non-Executive Directors and undertaking an annual review of the senior executives’ performance,  
including, setting with the Executive Chairman goals for the coming year and reviewing progress in achieving these goals. 

2.2.4  Remuneration Policy 

The Senior Executives’ Remuneration Policy was approved by resolution of the Board in October 2004 and the Non-Executive Director 
Remuneration Policy was also approved by resolution of the Board in January 2005. 

2.2.4.1  Senior Executive Remuneration Policy 

The  Company  is  committed  to  remunerating  its  senior  executives  in  a  manner  that  is  market-competitive  and  consistent  with  best 
practice  as  well  as  supporting  the  interests  of  shareholders.    Consequently,  under  the  Senior  Executive  Remuneration  Policy  the 

12 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance 

remuneration of senior executive may be comprised of the following: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

fixed salary that is determined from a review of the market and reflects core performance requirements and expectations; 

a  performance  bonus  designed  to  reward  actual  achievement  by  the  individual  of  performance  objectives  and  for 
materially improved Company performance; 

participation in share/option schemes with thresholds approved by shareholders; and  

statutory superannuation.   

By  remunerating  senior  executives  through  performance  and  long-term  incentive  plans  in  addition  to  their  fixed  remuneration  the 
Company aims to align the interests of senior executives with those of shareholders and increase Company performance.  Details of the 
remuneration, including both monetary and non-monetary components, for each of the Executives during the year are included in the 
Directors’ Report. 

The Board may use its discretion with respect to the payment of bonuses, stock options and other incentive payments.   

2.2.4.2  Non-Executive Director Remuneration Policy 

Non-Executive Directors are paid their fees out of the maximum aggregate amount approved by shareholders for the remuneration of 
Non-Executive Directors.  Non-Executive Directors do not receive performance based bonuses and do not participate in equity schemes 
of the Company.   

Non-Executive Directors are entitled to statutory superannuation.   

2.2.5  Current Director Remuneration 

The  aggregate  amount  of  remuneration  paid  to  Non-Executive  Directors  was  approved  by  shareholders  in  1996  and  is  currently 
$150,000.  Details of the remuneration received by all of the Company’s Directors are contained in the Directors’ Report. 

2.3 

Nomination Committee 

2.3.1  Role 

The role of a Nomination Committee is to help achieve a structured Board that adds value to the Company by ensuring an appropriate 
mix of skills are present in Directors on the Board at all times. 

As the whole Board only consists of four members, the Company does not have a nomination committee because it would not be a more 
efficient mechanism than the full Board for focusing the Company on specific issues.   

2.3.2  Responsibilities 

The responsibilities of a Nomination Committee include devising criteria for Board membership, regularly reviewing the need for various 
skills  and  experience  on  the  Board  and  identifying  specific  individuals  for  nomination  as  Directors  for  review  by  the  Board.    The 
Nomination  Committee  would  also  oversee  management  succession  plans  and  evaluates  the  Board’s  performance  and  makes 
recommendations for the appointment and removal of Directors. 

2.3.3  Criteria for selection of Directors 

Directors  are  appointed  based  on  the  specific  governance  skills  required  by  the  Company.    Given  the  size  of  the  Company  and  the 
business  that  it  operates,  the  Company  aims  at  all  times  to  have  at  least  one  Director  with  experience  in  the  Company’s  industry, 
appropriate to the Company’s market.  In addition, Directors should have the relevant blend of personal experience in: 

• 

• 

• 

 accounting and financial management; 

 legal skills; and 

 CEO-level business experience. 

3. 

Company Code Of Conduct 

As part of its commitment to recognising the legitimate interests of stakeholders, the Company has an established a Code of Conduct to 
guide compliance with legal and other obligations to legitimate stakeholders.  These stakeholders include employees, clients, customers, 
government authorities, creditors and the community as whole.  This Code includes the following. 

Responsibilities to Shareholders and the Financial Community Generally 

The Company complies with the spirit as well as the letter of all laws and regulations that govern shareholders’ rights.  The Company has 
processes  in  place  designed  to  ensure  the  truthful  and  factual  presentation  of  the  Company’s  financial  position  and  prepares  and 
maintains its accounts fairly and accurately in accordance with the generally accepted accounting and financial reporting standards. 

Annual Report 2005 |  13 

 
Corporate Governance 

Responsibilities to Clients, Customers and Consumers 

Each employee has an obligation to use their best efforts to deal in a fair and responsible manner with each of the Company’s clients, 
customers and consumers.  The Company for its part is committed to providing clients, customers and consumers with fair value.  

Employment Practices 

The Company endeavours to provide a safe workplace in which there is equal opportunity for all employees at all levels of the Company.  
The Company does not tolerate the offering or acceptance of bribes or the misuse of Company assets or resources. 

Obligations Relative to Fair Trading and Dealing 

The  Company  aims  to  conduct  its  business  fairly  and  to  compete  ethically  and  in  accordance  with  relevant  competition  laws.    The 
Company strives to deal fairly with the Company’s customers, suppliers, competitors and other employees and encourages it employees 
to strive to do the same.   

Responsibilities to the Community 

As part of the community the Company: 

• 

• 

• 

is  committed  to  conducting  its  business  in  accordance  with  applicable  environmental  laws  and  regulations  and 
encourages all employees to have regard for the environment when carrying out their jobs; 

encourages all employees to engage in activities beneficial to their local community; and 

supports community charities. 

Responsibility to the Individual  

The Company is committed to keeping private information from employees, clients, customers, consumers and investors confidential and 
protected from uses other than those for which it was provided. 

Conflicts of Interest 

Employees and Directors must avoid conflicts as well as the appearance of conflicts between personal interests and the interests of the 
Company. 

How the Company Complies with Legislation Affecting its Operations 

Within Australia, the Company strives to comply with the spirit and the letter of all legislation affecting its operations.  Outside Australia, 
the Company will  abide  by local laws in all countries in which  it  operates.  Where those laws are not  as stringent  as the Company’s 
operating policies, particularly in relation to the environment, workplace practices, intellectual property and the giving of “gifts”, Company 
policy will prevail. 

How the Company Monitors and Ensures Compliance with its Code 

The Board, management and all employees of the Company are committed to implementing this Code of Conduct and each individual is 
accountable for such compliance.  Disciplinary measures may be imposed for violating the Code.  

14 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
Directors’ Report 

In respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2005, the Directors of Helix Resources Limited, (the parent  
entity), submit the financial report. In order to comply with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, the  
Director’s report as follows:  

DIRECTORS 
The following persons held office as Directors of Helix Resources Limited during the whole of the financial year and up to the date of this 
report: 

Robert W Mosig MSc, FAusIMM, FAICD 
Executive Chairman 
Appointed 1 July 1985 
Mr Mosig is a Geologist with over 25 years experience in platinum group metals, gold and diamond exploration within Australasia. Mr 
Mosig was appointed Executive Chairman on 30 November 2004. 

The following persons were appointed as Directors of Helix Resources Limited during the financial year: 

Riccardo E Vittino 
Executive Director / Chief Operating Officer / Company Secretary 
Appointed 30 November 2004 
Mr Vittino is an Accountant with 20 years experience in company secretarial and corporate management. He has held numerous 
directorships in resource companies including Diamond Ventures and Platinum Australia. 

Greg Wheeler 
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed 25 October 2004 
Mr Wheeler has developed significant expertise over 13 years as a Partner of Chartered Accounting firms Grant Thornton and Deloitte 
Touche Tohmatsu, prior to establishing his own consulting company. His consulting skills include:- company and business valuations; 
advice to directors/shareholders on acquisitions or divestitures; commercial negotiations; risk assessment and mitigation. 

John denDryver 
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed 25 October 2004 
John den Dryver is a mining engineer with some 30 years mining  experience in operational and corporate  management. John joined 
Mount Isa Mines in 1973.  In 1982, John joined North Flinders Mines as the Company Mining Engineer.   He became the Operations 
Manager for North Flinders after the mine was commissioned in 1986 and over the next 10 years managed the operations as well as 
developing the further discoveries in this region including the Callie Mine. In 1987 he was invited to join the Board of North Flinders to 
become  Executive  Director-  Operations.    In  1997  after  Normandy  Mining  took  over  North  Flinders,  John  was  appointed  Executive 
General Manager-Technical leading a team of specialist geologists, mining engineers and metallurgists in operational support, technical 
review  and  due-diligence  activities.  In  2003,  after  the  takeover  of  Normandy  by  Newmont  Corporation  John  set  up  his  own  mining 
consultancy business. 

The following persons resigned as Directors of Helix Resources Limited during the financial year: 

Dr G. Michael Folie BE (Civil), DIC, MSc (Econ) PhD 
Non-Executive Chairman 
Resigned 25 October 2004 

Anthony R Martin BSc (Hons), MAusIMM  
Director Exploration – Executive Director 
Resigned 30 November 2004 

Ian K Macpherson BCom, CA 
Non-Executive Director 
Resigned 30 November 2004  

Bryce E Wauchope FCA, FAICD 
Non-Executive Director 
Resigned 30 November 2004 

Annual Report 2005 |  15 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Report 

DIRECTORSHIPS OF OTHER LISTED COMPANIES 
Directorships of other listed companies held by directors in the 3 years immediately before the end of the  
financial year are as follows: 

Name 
Riccardo Vittino   
John den Dryver  

Greg Wheeler 

COMPANY SECRETARY 
Riccardo Vittino   

Company 
Platinum Australia Limited 
Nustar Mining Corporation Limited  
Adelaide Resources Limited 
Acclaim Exploration NL 

Period of directorship 
7 August 2000 - 20 August 2002 
23 December 2003 – current 
18 April 2005 – current 
November 2002 to June 2003 

Mr Vittino is an Accountant with 20 years experience in company secretarial and corporate  
management. 

FORMER PARTNER OF THE AUDIT FIRM 
Greg Wheeler 

Past Lead Partner – Assurance & Advisory Division 
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 
October 1999 – April 2002 

Past Lead Partner – Assurance & Corporate Services Division 
Grant Thornton 
January 1987 – October 1999 

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES 
The  principal  activity  of  the  Consolidated  entity  constituted  by  Helix  Resources  Limited  and  the  entities  it  controlled  during  the  year 
consisted of platinum group metals (PGM), gold and mineral exploration. There has been no significant change in the nature of these 
activities during the year.  

FINANCIAL RESULTS 
The  net  consolidated  loss  of  the  Consolidated  entity  for  the  financial  period,  after  provision  for  income  tax  was  $1,297,895  (2004: 
$4,769,008). 

DIVIDENDS 
No dividend has been paid since the end of the previous financial year and no dividend is recommended for the current period. 

REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Following the decision in October 2004 to re-focus on exploration, Helix Resources has achieved several milestones which have resulted 
in positive outcomes for the Company.  

Firstly, considerable cost savings have been achieved through the company restructure, not only in the area of staffing, but also through 
the reduction of corporate overheads. 

Secondly, the Company has been  able to  attract joint venture partners to share the on-going exploration  and/or  development risk on 
several of its projects.  

A Joint Venture with Minotaur Exploration Ltd (“Minotaur”) over the Tunkillia Gold Project in South Australia was entered into in March of 
this year. Under the terms of the Joint Venture, Minotaur may earn a 51% interest in the tenements for an expenditure of $5 million over 
4  years,  of  which  $1,000,000  is  a  first  18  month,  minimum  commitment.  Under  a  proposed  generative  alliance  with  Oxiana  Limited, 
Minotaur may introduce Oxiana to the project, under terms to be finalised, in which case Minotaur/Oxiana may earn an additional 24.5% 
(total 75.5% equity) by completing a pre-feasibility study on the project, and achieving an Indicated Resource of at least 1 million ounces 
gold or gold-equivalent, in an additional 2 years. Minotaur will be the initial project operator. 

Another Joint Venture was entered into with API Management Pty Ltd (“API”) (a company equally owned by Aquila Resources Limited 
and  AMCI  Holdings  Australia  Ltd),  to  assess  the  Iron  Ore  potential  on  Helix’s  Yalleen  Project  in  the  Hamersley  Region  of  Western 
Australia. Under the terms of the Joint Venture API will spend a total of $1.5 million over 4 years to earn a 70% interest. 

Significant advances have been made at the Company’s West Pilbara Diamond Project, which is currently the subject of a Joint Venture 
with DeBeers Australia Exploration Limited (“DeBeers”). The Helix West Pilbara Diamond Project comprises 11 tenements, 100% owned 
by  Helix,  covering  nearly  2,000  square  kilometres  and  situated  to  the  south  of  the  Company’s  Munni  Munni  PGM  project  in  which 
DeBeers may earn a 51% interest in diamonds by spending AUD$3 million by June 2006.  

16 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Report 

In January of this year, Helix advised that initial reconnaissance and surface sampling by DeBeers had resulted in the discovery of two 
kimberlites  and  three  micro-diamonds  on  its  West  Pilbara  Diamond  tenements.  The  discovery  is  immediately  adjacent  to  the  DBAE 
Balmoral Project tenements where recently a 32.85 tonne bulk sample produced 89 macro diamonds totalling 4.17 carats from the -8.0 + 
1.0 mm fraction from the Blacktop kimberlite dyke and sill complex. A further 46 diamonds totalling 1.1 carats were also found  in the 
tailings re-treatment audit of the bulk sample. 

The kimberlite and micro-diamonds found on the Helix ground are located on the extension of the Blacktop kimberlite trend found on 
DeBeers’ ground. DeBeers’ drilling to date extends only to the boundary of the Helix tenements. There has been only limited sampling 
carried out on the Helix side of the boundary.  

Earlier  this  year,  DeBeers  advised  Helix  that  as  a  result  of  a  reassessment  of  DeBeers’  global  exploration  priorities,  field  activities  in 
Australia would be substantially reduced. As a consequence DeBeers and Helix are currently discussing a number of options with a view 
to ensure that the diamond exploration potential of the ground held by both parties is assessed thoroughly. 

The  Company  also  carried  out  exploration  activities  on  several  of  its  own  Projects.  At  the  Mt  Venn  Copper  and  Nickel  Project  near 
Laverton in Western Australia, twenty- four holes were drilled for a total of 3,031 metres, with most holes drilled to 120 metres depth on 
60 degrees inclinations. The targets for the drilling were the EM and magnetic anomalies situated below the gossanous outcrops which 
had been identified by the Company earlier in the year. 

Best assay results were achieved in hole MVRC 10, which intersected 2 metres grading 1.2% Nickel (including 1m at 1.8%Ni) from a 4 
metre wide zone grading 1.3% Copper. However, most drill holes contained broad widths of geochemically anomalous copper and nickel 
varying from several metres up to 30 metres in drilled widths. Evidence of weak platinum group metal anomalism was detected in only 
one drill hole specifically targeted into a titaniferous magnetite portion of the Mt Venn Intrusion. 

By placing these assays into the context of a layered ultramafic intrusive, the Company is encouraged by these first pass drilling results. 
The  Mt  Venn  Intrusion  has  now  been  confirmed  to  have  an  extensive  sulphide  layer  containing  well  developed  copper  and  nickel 
anomalism. Further exploration work must now focus on the identification of likely structural trap sites where economic levels of copper 
and nickel concentrations may occur. 

A RAB drilling program undertaken at the 100% owned Glenburgh Project during the year returned encouraging results including 8m at 
3.8g/t and 7m at 2.1g/t gold. The latest drilling has improved the prospectivity of increasing the resource inventory, which now stands at 
1.1Mt  at  3.1g/t  containing  108,000oz  of  gold.  This  new  resource  estimate  is  classed  as  inferred  and  complies  with  recommendations 
under the JORC Code. 

The  Company  reported  a  loss  of  $1,297,895  during  the  year,  related  essentially  to  the  write  down  of  carry  forward  exploration 
expenditure of $796,052. 

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS 
In the opinion of the Directors, other than that disclosed elsewhere in this Report, there were no significant changes in the state of affairs 
of the Consolidated entity that occurred during the period under review. 

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 
There has not been any matter or circumstance, other than that referred to in the financial statements or notes thereto, that has arisen 
since the end of the financial year, that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of the Consolidated Entity, the 
results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Consolidated Entity in future financial years.  

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 
Disclosure  of  information  regarding  likely  developments  in  the  operations  of  the  Consolidated  Entity  in  future  financial  years  and  the 
expected results of those operations is likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the Consolidated Entity.  Accordingly, this information 
has not been disclosed in this report. 

REMUNERATION REPORT 
The  Company’s  Executive  Officers’  remuneration  policy  is  set  to  ensure  that  remuneration  packages  properly  reflect  the  duties  and 
responsibilities of the senior executives and are sufficient to attract, retain and motivate personnel of the requisite quality. The policy is 
administered by the Remuneration Committee, which is composed of all board members. The Executive Officers of the Company are 
employed under Service Agreements which have been in existence since May 1997. The Service Agreements are all identical in their 
contents and only differ in remuneration levels. They have a duration of twelve months and renew automatically unless terminated by 
either the Company by giving twelve months notice to the individual; or by the individual by giving six months notice to the Company. The 
level of remuneration is not dependent on the satisfaction of any performance condition. 

Non-executive  Directors  are  remunerated  by  fees  determined  by  the  Board  within  the  aggregate  Directors’  fee  pool  limit  of  $150,000 
approved  by  shareholders  in  April  1996.  The  pool  limit  is  not  at  present  fully  utilised.  In  setting  the  fees,  account  is  taken  of  the 

Annual Report 2005 |  17 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors’ Report 

responsibilities inherent in the stewardship of the Company and the demands made of Directors in the discharge of their responsibilities. 
Advice is taken from independent consultancy sources to ensure remuneration accords with market practice.  

During the year certain non-executive directors retired and were paid a retirement benefit based on the policy in place at the time.  The 
policy  recognised  the  length  of  time  served  by  the  individual  as  a  non-executive  director  of  the  company.  The  company  has  largely 
adopted the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations and 
decided to remunerate its non-executive directors on an ongoing basis with no accrual or entitlement to a retirement benefit. 

Remuneration packages contain the following key elements: 

Primary benefits – salary / fees and performance based bonuses; 
Post employment benefits – prescribed retirement benefit; and 
Equity – share options granted under the executive share option plan as disclosed in note 17 to the financial statements. 

The following table discloses the remuneration of the directors and executives of the company: 

2005 

Primary 

Perfor-
mance 
Based 
Pay-
ment 
 $ 

Salary 
& Fees 

$ 

Post Employment 

Equity 

Non 
Monet-
ary 

Supera- 
nnua-
tion 

Pre- 
scribed 
Bene-
fits 

 $ 

 $ 

$ 

Other 
Retire-
ment 
Bene-
fits 
 $ 

Options 

% of 
Remu-
nera-
tion 

Other 
Bene-
fits 

Total 

$ 

 $ 

$ 

$ 

Directors 

R W Mosig 

156,750 

R E Vittino 

115,180 

G Wheeler 

19,267 

J denDryver 

18,826 

G M Folie 

31,570 

I Macpherson 

10,857 

B Wauchope 

9,832 

A R Martin 

118,850 

Total 

481,132 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

12,000 

12,000 

- 

- 

2,718 

-  

1,025 

10,639 

38,382 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

27,156 

13.86 

13,578 

9.65 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

13,578 

9.49 

54,312 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

195,906 

140,758 

19,267 

18,826 

34,288 

10,857 

10,857 

143,067 

573,826 

During the financial year retirement benefits of $50,000 each were paid to IK Macpherson and B Wauchope which had been accrued in 
prior years. 

Value of Options issued to directors 
The value attributed to the Equity Option is  calculated using the Black Scholes Model.  No cash has been paid to the individuals.  The 
value of the Options will only be realised if and when the market price of Helix shares, as quoted by the Australian Stock Exchange, rises 
above the Exercise Price of the options. Further details of the options are contained in note 16 to the financial statements.  
Details of Directors’ appointment and retirement dates which occurred during the year are outlined below: 
There are no other executives of the company or consolidated entity. 

Name 

Position 

Date Appointed 

Date Retired 

Dr G M Folie 
A R Martin 

I K Macpherson 
B E Wauchope 
R E Vittino 

G Wheeler 
J denDryver 

Non-executive Chairman 
Executive Director / Director 
Exploration 
Non-executive Director 
Non-executive Director 
Executive Director / Chief 
Operating Officer / Company 
Secretary 
Non-executive Director 
Non-executive Director 

30 November 2004 

30 November 2004 
30 November 2004 

25 October 2004 
30 November 2004 

30 November 2004 
30 November 2004 

18 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Director’s Report 

DIRECTORS’ AND EXECUTIVES’ SHARE OPTIONS 
In accordance with the provisions of the Employee Share Option Plan, executives and employees are entitled to subscribe for ordinary 
shares on the terms agreed to by the Shareholders at a meeting held on 10 November 2003 in respect of the 2009 options.  At the date 
of this report directors and executives are entitled to purchase an aggregate of 3,450,000 ordinary shares of Helix Resources Limited 
according to the following terms: 

Directors                 

and Executives 

Number of 
Executive 
Options 
Held 

Issuing Entity 

Exercise Price 

Expiry Date 

Number of ordinary 
shares under option 

 Robert W Mosig 

533,333 

Helix Resources Limited 

Chairman 

533,334 

Helix Resources Limited 

533,333 

Helix Resources Limited 

1,600,000 

 Anthony R Martin 

316,668 

Helix Resources Limited 

Exploration Manager 

316,666 

Helix Resources Limited 

316,666 

Helix Resources Limited 

$0.42 

$0.46 

$0.50 

$0.42 

$0.46 

$0.50 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

 Riccardo E Vittino 

Executive Director 

950,000 

300,001 

300,000 

299,999 

900,000 

Helix Resources Limited 

Helix Resources Limited 

Helix Resources Limited 

$0.42 

$0.46 

$0.50 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

29.03.2009 

533,333 

533,334 

533,333 

1,600,000 

316,668 

316,666 

316,666 

950,000 

300,001 

300,000 

299,999 

900,000 

No options were granted as remuneration to directors or executives during the year.   

DIRECTORS’ SHAREHOLDINGS 

Director 

*Fully Paid 

*Listed Options 

Staff Options 

R W Mosig 

R E Vittino 

G J Wheeler 

J den Dryver 

Ordinary Shares 

2,484,846 

900,000 

753,880 

- 

857,516 

614,271 

- 

- 

1,600,000 

900,000 

- 

- 

4,138,726 

1,471,787 

2,500,000 

* 

Directors’ interests in ordinary shares and options of the parent entity are shown at the date of this Directors’ Report. 

OFFICERS’ INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE 
During  the  year  the  Company  paid  an  insurance  premium  to  insure  the  Directors  and  Officers  of  the  Company  and  related  bodies 
corporate. The Officers of the Company covered by the insurance policy include the Directors named in this report. 

The Directors’ and Officers’ Liability insurance provides cover against all costs and expenses that may be incurred in defending civil or 
criminal proceedings that fall within the scope of the indemnity and that may be brought against the officers in their capacity as officers of 

Annual Report 2005 |  19 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Directors’ Report 

the Company  or a related body corporate.  The insurance  policy does  not contain details of  the premium paid in respect of individual 
officers of the Company. Disclosure of the nature of the liability cover and the amount of the premium is subject to a confidentiality clause  
under the insurance policy. 

The Company has entered into an agreement with the Directors and Officers to indemnify them against any claim and related expenses, 
which arise as a result of work completed in their respective capacities. 

The  Company  has  not  otherwise,  during  or  since  the  financial  year  indemnified  or  agreed  to  indemnify  an  officer  or  auditor  of  the 
Company or of any related body corporate against a liability incurred as such an officer or auditor. 

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS 
The Consolidated entity is subject to environmental regulations under laws of the Commonwealth and State. The Consolidated entity has 
a policy of complying with its environmental performance obligations and at the date of this report, is not aware of any breach of such 
regulations. 

MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS 
The number of meetings held during the year by Company Directors (including meetings of committees of Directors) and the number of 
those meetings attended by each Director was: 

Board of Directors’ 
 Meetings 

Remuneration Committee 
Meetings 

Audit Committee 
Meetings 

Held* 

Attended 

Held* 

Attended 

Held 

Attended 

Dr G M Folie 

R W Mosig 

A R Martin 

I K Macpherson 

B E Wauchope 

R E Vittino 

G J Wheeler 

J den Dryver 

4 

7 

5 

5 

5 

3 

3 

3 

4 

7 

5 

5 

5 

3 

3 

3 

1 

1 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

1 

1 

1 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

1 

1 

1 

* Reflects the number of meetings held during the time that the Director held office during the year. 

NON-AUDIT SERVICES 
The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services, during the year, by the auditor is compatible with the general standard 
of  independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001 as the nature of the services was limited to the review of the 1 July 
2004 A-IFRS balance sheet and the review of the company’s 2004 tax returns.  Details of amounts paid or payable to the auditor for non-
audit services provided during the year by the auditor are outlined in note 24. 

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 
The auditor’s independence declaration is included on page 14 of the financial report.  

Dated at Perth this   5th  day of    September 2005. 
This report is made and signed in accordance with a resolution of Directors made pursuant to s.298(2) of the Corporations Act 2001. 
On behalf of the Directors 

Robert W Mosig 
Executive Chairman 

20 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Independence Decaration 

Annual Report 2005 |  21 

 
Independent Audit Report 

22 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
Independent Audit Report 

Annual Report 2005 |  23 

 
 
Directors’ Declaration 

The Directors declare that: 

In the directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they 
become due and payable; 

In the directors’ opinion, the attached financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including 
compliance with accounting standards and giving a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the Consolidated 
Entity; and 

The directors have been given the declarations required by s295A of the Corporations Act 2001. 

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors made pursuant to s.295(5) of the Corporations Act 2001. 

On behalf of the Directors 

Robert W Mosig 
Executive Chairman 

Signed at Perth this   5th day of  September  2005. 

24 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Financial Position 
as at 30 June 2005 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

Note 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

Current Assets 

Cash assets 

Receivables 

Other 

Total Current Assets 

Non-Current Assets 

Investments 

Property, plant & equipment 

Mineral interests 

Other 

Total Non-Current Assets 

Total Assets 

Current Liabilities 

Payables 

Provisions 

Total Current Liabilities 

Non Current Liabilities 

Provisions 

2 

3 

4 

3 

5 

6 

4 

7 

8 

8 

1,635,873 

1,634,457 

1,635,871 

1,634,455 

78,088 

306,410 

156,058 

284,222 

78,088 

306,410 

156,058 

284,222 

2,020,371 

2,074,737 

2,020,369 

2,074,735 

890 

171,250 

163,391 

223,725 

1,815 

171,250 

164,316 

223,725 

11,201,564 

10,425,408 

11,201,564 

10,425,408 

149,242 

136,779 

149,242 

136,779 

11,522,946 

10,949,303 

11,523,871 

10,950,228 

13,543,317 

13,024,040 

13,544,240 

13,024,963 

214,856 

67,375 

159,252 

59,313 

214,856 

67,375 

159,252 

59,313 

282,231 

218,565 

282,231 

218,565 

10,538 

212,516 

10,538 

212,516 

Total Non Current Liabilities 

10,538 

212,516 

10,538 

212,516 

Total Liabilities 

292,769 

431,081 

292,769 

431,081 

Net Assets 

13,250,548 

12,592,959 

13,251,471 

12,593,882 

Equity 

Contributed Equity 

Accumulated Losses 

9 

11 

43,567,055 

41,611,571 

43,567,055 

41,611,571 

  (30,316,507) 

(29,018,612) 

   (30,315,584) 

(29,017,689) 

Total Equity 

13,250,548 

12,592,959 

13,251,471 

12,593,882 

Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 28 to 46 

Annual Report 2005 |  25 

 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Statement of Financial Performance 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

Note 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

12 

12 

Revenue from operating activities 

Proceeds from sale of investments 
Reversal of Directors’ Retirement 
Provision 
Write down of investments 

Depreciation 
Exploration and evaluation expenditure 
written off 
Legal Expenses and Professional 
Services 
Consultancy fees 

Public Relations expenses 

Travel and Accommodation expenses 

Rental expenses 

Employee benefits expense 

Directors’ Fees 
Written Down Value of Investments 
disposed 

123,008        

124,801 

284,595 

104,217 

(54,501) 

(56,993) 

1,928,351 

- 

(111,000) 

(51,270) 

123,008 

284,595 

104,217 

(54,501) 

(56,993) 

124,801 

1,928,351 

- 

(111,000) 

(51,270) 

(796,052) 

(4,533,390) 

(796,052) 

(4,533,390) 

(97,162) 

(3,426) 

(26,378) 

(30,871) 

(83,997) 

(300,626) 

(94,095) 

(141,015) 

(126,275) 

(74,438) 

(139,391) 

(47,217) 

(557,874) 

(112,646) 

(97,162) 

(3,426) 

(26,378) 

(30,871) 

(83,997) 

(300,626) 

(94,095) 

(141,015) 

(126,275) 

(74,438) 

(139,391) 

(47,217) 

(557,874) 

(112,646) 

 (108,000) 

 (749,852) 

 (108,000) 

 (749,852) 

Other expenses from ordinary activities 

 (157,614) 

 (177,792) 

 (157,614) 

 (177,792) 

Loss from ordinary activities before 
income tax 

Income tax expense relating to ordinary 
activities 

Net Loss 

Total  Changes in Equity Other than 
those Resulting from Transactions with 
Owners as Owners 

Earnings / (Loss) per share 

Basic (cents per share) 

Diluted (cents per share) 

11 

18 

20 

20 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1.84) 

(1.84) 

(8.28) 

(8.28) 

Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 28 to 46   

26 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Statement of Cash Flows 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

Note 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

Cash Flow From Operating Activities 

Payments to suppliers and employees 

(762,687) 

(1,662,717) 

(762,324) 

(1,662,717) 

Interest received 

Other receipts 

111,638 

11,370 

114,307 

10,494 

111,638 

11,007 

114,307 

10,494 

Net cash used in operating activities 

2(b) 

(639,679) 

(1,537,916) 

(639,679) 

(1,537,916) 

Cash Flow From Investing Activities 

Payments for capitalised exploration & evaluation 
expenditure 

(1,552,208) 

(4,252,865) 

(1,552,208) 

(4,252,865) 

Payment for property, plant & equipment 

(5,465) 

(85,896) 

(5,465) 

(85,896) 

Proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipment 

Payments for shares – listed companies 

363 

- 

- 

(86,130) 

363 

- 

- 

(86,130) 

Proceeds from sale of shares 

284,595 

1,928,351 

284,595 

1,928,351 

Payments for security deposits 

Proceeds from bills of exchange 

(21,674) 

(16,020) 

(21,674) 

(16,020) 

- 

995,905 

- 

995,905 

Net cash used in investing activities 

(1,294,389) 

(1,516,655) 

(1,294,389) 

(1,516,655) 

Cash Flow From Financing Activities 

Proceeds from issue of shares/options 

2,053,997 

2,311,366 

2,053,997 

2,311,366 

Share issue costs paid 

(118,513) 

- 

(118,513) 

- 

Net cash provided by Financing Activities 

1,935,484 

2,311,366 

1,935,484 

2,311,366 

Net increase/(decrease) in cash held 

1,416 

(743,205) 

1,416 

(743,205) 

Cash at beginning of financial year 

1,634,457 

2,377,662 

1,634,455 

2,377,660 

Cash at End of Financial Year 

2(a) 

1,635,873 

1,634,457 

1,635,871 

1,634,455 

Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 28 to 46   

Annual Report 2005 |  27 

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

1. 

SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES 
Financial Reporting Framework 
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report that has been prepared in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, 
applicable Accounting Standards and Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views, and complies with other requirements of the law. 

The  financial  report  has  been  prepared  on  the  basis  of  historical  cost  and  except  where  stated,  does  not  take  into  account 
changing money values or current valuations of non-current valuations of non-current assets.  Cost is based on the fair values of 
the consideration given in exchange for assets. 

Significant Accounting Policies 
Accounting  policies  are  selected  and  applied  in  a  manner,  which  ensure  that  the  resulting  financial  information  satisfied  the 
concepts  of  relevance  and  reliability,  thereby  ensuring  that  the  substance  of  the  underlying  transactions  or  other  events  is 
reported. 

The following significant accounting policies have been adopted in the preparation and presentation of the financial report. 

a)     Going Concern 

The Directors have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal business 
activities and the realisation of assets and extinguishment of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. 

The  Company’s  operations  require  it  to  raise  capital  on  an  ongoing  basis  to  fund  its  planned  exploration  program  and  to 
commercialise its tenement assets.  If the Company does not raise further capital in the short term, it can continue as a going 
concern by reducing planned, but not committed exploration expenditure until funding is available and/or entering into joint venture 
arrangements. 

The  Directors  believe  the  going  concern  basis  of  accounting  is  appropriate  as  the  Company  has  a  successful  track  record  in 
raising capital and believe they will be able to obtain further funding to commercialise the tenement assets in the form currently 
envisaged. 

Exploration expenditure has decreased on some projects during the financial year due to the Company entering into various joint 
ventures, where exploration is funded by the joint venture partner.  Joint ventures are detailed in note 21. 

b)  

Principles of Consolidation 
The  consolidated  financial  statements  are  prepared  by  combining  the  financial  statements  of  all  the  entities  that  comprise  the 
Consolidated  entity,  being  the  Company  (the  parent  entity)  and  its  controlled  entities  as  defined  in  accounting  standard  AASB 
1024 “Consolidated Accounts”.  A list of controlled entities appears in note 3 to the financial statements.  Consistent accounting 
policies are employed in the preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements. 

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  information  and  results  of  each  controlled  entity  from  the  date  on  which  the 
Company obtains control and until such time as the Company ceases to control such entity. 

In  preparing  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  all  intercompany  balances  and  transactions,  and  unrealised  profits  arising 
within the Consolidated entity are eliminated in full. 

c)     Cash and Cash Equivalents 

Cash on hand and in banks and short term deposits are stated at nominal value.  For the purposes of the Statement of Cash 
Flows, cash includes cash on hand and in banks, and money market investments readily convertible to cash within 90 days, net of 
outstanding bank overdrafts. 

d)  

Income Tax 
Tax-effect accounting principles are adopted whereby the income tax expense shown in the statement of financial performance is 
based on the pre-tax accounting profit adjusted for any permanent differences. Timing differences, which arise due to the different 
accounting  periods  in  which  items  of  revenue  and  expense  are  included  in  the  determination  of  pre-tax  accounting  profit  and 
taxable income, are brought to account as either a provision for deferred income tax, or an asset described as future income tax 
benefit at the rate of income tax applicable to the period in which the benefit will be received, or the liability will become payable. 
The net future income tax benefit relating to tax losses and timing differences is not carried forward as an asset unless the benefit 
is virtually certain of being realised.  

28 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

e)  

Property, Plant and Equipment 
Property,  plant  and  equipment  is  stated  at  cost  and  is  depreciated  at  rates  based  upon  their  expected  useful  lives  to  the 
Consolidated entity. The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment is reviewed annually by Directors to ensure it is not in 
excess  of  the  recoverable  amount  from  these  assets.  Expected  net  cash  flows  have  not  been  discounted  in  determining 
recoverable amount. The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable assets are: 

Plant and equipment 

Straight line 

Diminishing value 

10% - 33% 

20% - 40% 

Motor Vehicles 

Diminishing value 

22.5% 

Mineral Interests, Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure 
Exploration and  evaluation expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. These costs are 
only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area, or where 
activities  in  the  area  have  not  yet  reached  a  stage,  which  permits  reasonable  assessment  of  the  existence  of  economically 
recoverable reserves. When production commences, the accumulated costs for the relevant area of interest are amortised over 
the life of the area according to the rate of depletion of the economically recoverable reserves. Any costs of site restoration are 
provided for during the relevant production stages and included in the costs of that stage. A regular review is undertaken of each 
area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest and costs 
are written down to the extent they are not considered recoverable. 

Leases 
Lease payments for operating leases where substantially all the risks and benefits remain with the lessor are charged as expenses 
in the periods in which they are incurred. 

Investments 
Investments  in  controlled  entities  are  held  at  cost.    Other  investments  are  valued  at  cost  or  recoverable  amount.  The  carrying 
amount  of  investments  is  reviewed  annually  by  Directors  to  ensure  it  is  not  in  excess  of  the  recoverable  amount  of  these 
investments.  The  recoverable  amount  is  assessed  from  the  shares'  current  market  value  or  the  underlying  net  assets  in  the 
particular entities. Expected net cash flows have not been discounted in determining recoverable amounts. 

Employee Benefits 
Provision is made for benefits accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave and long service leave when 
it is probable that settlement will be required and they are capable of being measured reliably. 
Provision is made in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave and other employee benefits expected to be settled within 12 
months, are measured at their nominal values using the remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement. 

Provision made in respect of long service leave which is not expected to be settled within 12 months is measured as the present 
value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made by the consolidated entity in respect of services provided by the employees 
up to reporting date. 

g)  

h)  

i)  

j)     Interest in Joint Venture Operations 

Interest  in  joint  venture  operations,  where  material,  are  brought  to  account  by  including  in  the  respective  classifications,  the 
Consolidated entity's share of the individual assets employed and liabilities and expenses incurred. 

Details of interests in joint ventures are shown at Note 21. 

k)      Revenue Recognition 

Revenue from the disposal of assets is recognised when the Consolidated entity has passed control of the goods or other assets 
to the buyer. Interest on bank deposits is recognised as income as it accrues. 

l) 

Accounts Payable 
Trade  payables  and  other  accounts  payable  are  recognised  when  the  Consolidated  entity  becomes  obliged  to  make  future 
payments resulting from the purchase of goods and services. 

m)  Receivables 

Other receivables are recorded at amounts due less any specific provision for doubtful debts.  

Annual Report 2005 |  29 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

n)      Goods and Services Tax 

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax GST), except: 
where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the taxation authority, it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition 
of an asset or as part of an item of expense; or 
for receivables and payables which are recognised inclusive of GST. 

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables. 

Cash flows are included in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis. The GST component of cash flows arising from investing 
and financing activities which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is classified as operating cash flows.  

o)    Recoverable Amount of Non-Current Assets 

Non-current  assets  are  written  down  to  recoverable  amount  where  the  carrying  value  of  any  non-current  asset  exceeds 
recoverable amount. In determining the recoverable  amount of non-current  assets, the  expected net cash flows have  not  been 
discounted to their present value. 

p)     Reclassification 

Deposits with financial institutions of $227,686 at 30 June 2004 have been reclassified from ‘security deposits’ and disclosed as 
current assets as  these deposits had a maturity date greater than 90 days but less than 1 year ( see note 4). 

30 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

NOTES TO THE STATEMENT  OF CASHFLOWS 

2. 
a)  Reconciliation of Cash 

For the purposes of the statement of cashflows, cash includes cash on hand and in banks, and investments in money market 
instruments, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.  Cash at the end of the financial year as shown in the statement of cash flows is 
reconciled to the related items in the statement of financial position as follows 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

Cash at Bank and on Deposit 

1,635,873 

1,634,457 

1,635,871 

1,634,455 

b)   Reconciliation of loss from ordinary activities 
after related income tax to net cash flows 
from operating activities 

Loss from Ordinary Activities after related income 
tax 

Non-cash flows in Operating Loss 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

Depreciation 

56,993 

51,270 

56,993 

51,270 

Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off 

796,052 

4,533,390 

796,052 

4,533,390 

        Write down of investments 

54,501 

(459,204) 

54,501 

(459,204) 

(Profit)/loss on sale of investments 

(176,595) 

(608,295) 

(176,595) 

(608,295) 

Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment 

584 

1,467 

584 

1,467 

Changes in Net Assets and Liabilities 

(Increase)/Decrease in Assets 

(Increase)/decrease in other receivables 

77,970 

(130,288) 

77,970 

(130,288) 

Increase in prepayments 

(12,977) 

(3,114) 

(12,977) 

(3,114) 

Increase/(decrease) in Liabilities 

Increase/(Decrease) in trade payables 

55,604 

(11,129) 

55,604 

(11,129) 

Provisions employee entitlements 

(193,916) 

(143,005) 

(193,916) 

(143,005) 

Net Cash used in Operating Activities 

(639,679) 

1,537,916) 

(639,679) 

(1,537,916) 

c)    Non-cash Transactions 

JA Bunting & Associates was issued 100,000 shares at $0.20c per share as option payment over Loongana project.  
 See note 9. 

Annual Report 2005 |  31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

3.     RECEIVABLES & INVESTMENTS 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

 2005 

$ 

 2004 

$ 

78,088 

78,088 

156,058 

156,058 

78,088 

78,088 

156,058 

156,058 

Current 

Other 

Total Current Receivables 

Non-Current  

Shares in unlisted companies—at cost 

890 

55,391 

Shares in controlled entities—-at cost (3a) 

Shares in companies listed on a stock 
exchange—at recoverable amount 

- 

- 

890 

925 

55,391 

925 

- 

108,000 

- 

108,000 

Total Non-Current Receivables 

890 

163,391 

1,815 

164,316 

Shares in companies listed on a 
prescribed stock exchange at market value 

- 

108,000 

- 

108,000 

3(a)       Shares in controlled entities 

Name 

Country of Incorporation 

Hillview Mining NL 

Australia 

Helix Mining Investments P/L 

Australia 

Percentage Held 
2005 

Percentage Held 
2004 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

 4.    OTHER ASSETS 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

 2005 
$ 

 2004 
$ 

69,513 

236,897 

306,410 

149,242 

149,242 

56,536 

227,686 

284,222 

136,779 

136,779 

69,513 

56,536 

236,897 

227,686 

306,410 

284,222 

149,242 

149,242 

136,779 

136,779 

Current 

Prepayments 

Deposits – Financial Institutions 

Total Other Assets— Current 

 Non-Current 

Security Deposits 

Total Other Assets—Non Current 

32 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

5.    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 

CONSOLIDATED AND COMPANY 
Motor Vehicles 

Plant &  
Equipment 
$ 

Gross Carrying Amount 
Balance at 30 June 2004 
Additions 
Disposals 
Balance at 30 June 2005 

Accumulated Depreciation 
Balance at 30 June 2004 
Disposals 
Depreciation 
Balance at 30 June 2005 

Net Book Value 
30 June 2004 
30 June 2005 

432,485 
5,465 
(1,377) 
436,573 

233,812 
(430) 
51,356 
284,738 

198,673 
151,835 

$ 

50,024 
- 
- 
50,024 

24,972 
- 
5,637 
30,609 

25,052 
19,415 

Total 

$ 

482,509 
5,465 
(1,377) 
486,597 

258,784 
(430) 
56,993 
315,347 

223,725 
171,250 

Aggregate depreciation has been allocated, whether recognised as an expense or capitalised as part of the carrying amount of other 
assets during the year. 

Plant and Equipment 

Motor Vehicles 

6.  MINERAL INTERESTS 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

51,356 

5,637 

56,993 

44,516 

6,754 

51,270 

51,356 

5,637 

56,993 

44,516 

6,754 

51,270 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

Balance at beginning of the financial year 

10,425,408 

 10,423,932 

10,425,408 

10,423,932 

Expenditure incurred during the year 

1,572,208 

4,534,866 

1,572,208 

4,534,866 

Expenditure written off during the year 

(796,052) 

(4,533,390) 

(796,052) 

(4,533,390) 

Balance at the end of the financial year 

11,201,564 

10,425,408 

11,201,564 

10,425,408 

The Directors' assessment of recoverable amount was after: consideration of prevailing market conditions; previous expenditure carried 
out on the tenements; and the potential for mineralisation based on both the entity's and independent  geological reports. The ultimate 
value of these assets is dependent upon recoupment by commercial development or the sale of the whole, or part, of the Consolidated 
entity's interests in those areas for an amount at least equal to the carrying value. There may exist, on the Consolidated entity’s 
exploration properties, areas subject to claim under native title or containing sacred sites or sites of significance to Aboriginal people. As 
a result, exploration properties or areas within the tenements may be subject to exploration and mining restrictions. 

Annual Report 2005 |  33 

 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

214,856 

159,252 

214,856 

159,252 

41,454 

25,921 

67,375 

36,559 

 22,754 

59,313 

41,454 

25,921 

67,375 

36,559 

 22,754 

59,313 

- 

204,217 

- 

204,217 

10,538 

10,538 

8,299 

212,516 

10,538 

10,538 

8,299 

212,516 

7.  CURRENT PAYABLES 

Trade payables 

8.  PROVISIONS 

Current 

Provision for annual leave 

Provision for long service leave 

Non Current 

Provision  for  Non-Executive  Directors’ 
retirement 

Provision for long service leave 

9.  CONTRIBUTED EQUITY 

76,660,120  Fully  Paid  Ordinary  Shares 
(2004: 62,866,808) 

16,437,863 Listed Options  
(2004: 16,437,863) 

43,409,956 

 41,454,472 

43,409,956 

  41,454,472 

157,099 

 157,099 

157,099 

157,099 

Balance at end of financial year 

43,567,055 

 41,611,571 

43,567,055 

 41,611,571 

34 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

9.  CONTRIBUTED EQUITY (cont’d) 

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares 

2005 

2004 

No. 

$ 

No. 

$ 

Balance at beginning of financial year 

62,866,808 

41,454,472 

50,525,458 

38,889,600 

Issue of shares to Anglogold as part consideration for 
purchase of Tunkillia project 

- 

- 

1,250,000 

250,000 

Shareholder Purchase Plan and Placement 

13,693,312 

2,053,997 

5,162,500 

826,000 

Share Issue Costs 

Issue of shares to JA Bunting & Associates as Option 
payment over Loongana Project 

Exercise of Options  to Fully Paid Shares 

Share placement through Rights Issues 

Balance at end of financial year 

Listed Options 

- 

(118,513) 

100,000 

20,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

424,681 

112,830 

5,504,169 

1,376,042 

76,660,120 

43,409,956 

62,866,808 

41,454,472 

. 

Balance at beginning of financial year 

16,437,863 

157,099 

12,860,310 

128,605 

Issue of options to Anglogold as part consideration for 
purchase of Tunkillia project. 

Options issue through Rights Issue 

Exercise of Options to Fully Paid Shares 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1,250,000 

32,500 

2,752,234 

- 

(424,681) 

(4,006) 

Balance at end of financial year 

16,437,863 

157,099 

16,437,863 

157,099 

Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends. 
Listed options carry no votes until converted to fully paid ordinary shares. 

10. RESERVES  

Asset Revaluation Reserve 

Balance at beginning of financial year 

Transfer to accumulated losses balance of reserve 
relating to assets sold 

Balance at end of financial year 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

- 

- 

 - 

 190,606 

(190,606) 

 - 

- 

- 

 - 

 490,606 

(490,606) 

 - 

The asset revaluation reserve arose on the revaluation of non-current assets. During the prior year the asset was sold and accordingly 
the portion of the asset revaluation reserve which related to that asset, was effectively realised, and transferred to accumulated losses. 

Annual Report 2005 |  35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

11.ACCUMULATED LOSSES 

Balance at beginning of financial year 

Transfer from Asset Revaluation Reserve 

 (29,018,612) 

 (24,440,210) 

 (29,017,689) 

 (24,739,287) 

 - 

 190,606 

 - 

 490,606 

Net Loss attributable to members of the parent entity 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

Balance at end of financial year 

(30,316,507) 

 (29,018,612) 

(30,315,584) 

 (29,017,689) 

  12. LOSS FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES 

Loss from ordinary activities before Income Tax includes the following items of revenue and expense: 

a)  Operating Revenue 
Interest Revenue 
Other 

b) Non-Operating Revenue 
Proceeds from Sale of listed securities in Diamond 
Ventures NL 

Proceeds from sale of RAMA Mines shares 

C)- Expenses 
Depreciation of non-current assets: Property, plant 
and equipment 
Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off 
Operating lease rental expenses Minimum lease 
payments 

111,638 
11,370 
123,008 

107,208 

177,387 

284,595 

56,993 
796,052 

83,997 

114,307 
10,494 
124,801 

111,638 
11,370 
123,008 

114,307 
10,494 
124,801 

1,928,351 

- 

1,928,351 

51,270 
 4,533,390 

47,217 

107,208 

177,387 

284,595 

56,993 
796,052 

83,997 

1,928,351 

- 

1,928,351 

51,270 
 4,533,390 

47,217 

13. SALE OF ASSETS 
Sales of assets in the ordinary course of business have given rise to the following profits / (losses): 
NET PROFITS / (LOSSES) 

Property, plant & equipment 

Investments 

14. COMMITMENTS 
a) Operating Lease Commitments 

Not later than 1 year 

Later than 1 year but not later than 2 years 

(584) 

176,595 

 176,011 

(1,467) 

1,178,499 

 1,177,032 

(584) 

176,595 

 176,011 

(1,467) 

1,178,499 

 1,177,032 

65,000 

27,083 

92,083 

129,420 

 64,710 

194,130 

65,000 

27,083 

92,083 

129,420 

 64,710 

194,130 

The term of the Operating Lease in existence over the Company’s head office was for an initial period of two years. As at balance date 
there was a balance of seventeen months remaining.  The Company has an option to renew the operating lease for a further period of 
two years. 

36 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

b)  Exploration Expenditure Commitments 
In  order  to  maintain  current  rights  of  tenure  to  exploration  tenements,  the  company  and  consolidated  entity  are  required  to  perform 
minimum  exploration  work  to  meet  the  requirements  specified  by  various  State  governments.    These  obligations  can  be  reduced  by 
selective  relinquishment  of  exploration  tenure  or  application  for  expenditure  exemptions.    Due  to  the  nature  of  the  company  and 
consolidated entity’s operations in exploring and evaluating areas of interest, it is very difficult to forecast the nature and amount of future 
expenditure.    It  is  anticipated  that  expenditure  commitments  for  the  next  twelve  months  will  be  tenement  rentals  of    $105,891  (2004: 
$202,166) and exploration expenditure of $747,766 (2004: $1,941,520). 

DIRECTORS’ AND EXECUTIVES’ REMUNERATION 
15. 
The specified Directors of Helix Resources Limited during the year were: 

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

R W Mosig  (Chairman), Managing Director 
R E Vittino  (Executive), appointed 30.11.04 – Company Secretary / Chief Operating Officer 
G Wheeler (Non-executive), appointed 25.10.04 
J den Dryver (Non-executive), appointed 25.10.04 
Dr G M Folie  (Chairman), resigned 25.10.04 
I K Macpherson  (Non-executive), resigned 30.11.04 
B E Wauchope  (Non-executive), resigned 30.11.04 
A R Martin (Executive), resigned 30.11.04 – Exploration Manager 

There were no specified executives during the year. 

The  Company’s  Executive  Officers’  remuneration  policy  is  set  to  ensure  that  remuneration  packages  properly  reflect  the  duties  and 
responsibilities of the senior executives and are sufficient to attract, retain and motivate personnel of the requisite quality. The policy is 
administered  by  the  Remuneration  Committee,  which  is  composed  of  all  board  members.  Remuneration  packages  are  reviewed  and 
determined with due regard to current market rates and are benchmarked against comparable industry salaries. The Executive Officers 
of the Company are employed under Service Agreements which have been in existence since May 1997. The Service Agreements are 
all  identical  in  their  contents  and  only  differ  in  remuneration  levels.  They  have  a  duration  of  twelve  months  and  renew  automatically 
unless terminated by either the Company by giving twelve months notice to the individual; or by the individual by giving six months notice 
to the Company.  

Non-executive  Directors  are  remunerated  by  fees  determined  by  the  Board  within  the  aggregate  Directors’  fee  pool  limit  of  $150,000 
approved  by  shareholders  in  April  1996.  The  pool  limit  is  not  at  present  fully  utilised.  In  setting  the  fees,  account  is  taken  of  the 
responsibilities inherent in the stewardship of the Company and the demands made of Directors in the discharge of their responsibilities. 
Advice is taken from independent consultancy sources to ensure remuneration accords with market practice  

2004 

Salary & 
Fees 

Primary 
Perfor-
mance 
Based 
Payment 
$ 

- 
- 
(iii)56,250 
(iii)35,625 
- 
- 
91,875 

$ 

40,125 
11,223 
230,308 
131,981 
30,094 
27,094 
470,825 

127,154 
127,154 

(iii)33,750 
33,750 

Supera- 
nnuation 

Post Employment  
Pre- 
scribed 
Benefits 

Non 
Mone-
tary 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Other 
Retire-
ment 
Benefits 
$ 

Equity 
Options 

Total 

Other 
Bene-
fits 

$ 

$ 

$ 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
1,110 
12,000 
10,519 
 - 
 3,000 
26,629 

12,000 
12,000 

- 
 - 
- 
- 
 - 
- 
- 

- 
- 

(i)156,933 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
156,933 

- 
- 
(ii)53,228 
(ii)26,614 
- 
- 
79,842 

- 
- 

(ii)26,614 
26,614 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

197,058 
12,333 
351,786 
204,739 
30,094 
30,094 
826,104 

199,518 
199,518 

Directors 
E W J Tyler 
Dr G M Folie 
R W Mosig 
A R Martin 
I K Macpherson 
B E Wauchope 
Total 

Executives 
R E Vittino 
Total 

(i) 

Mr E W J Tyler received an Eligible Termination Payment of $156,933 upon his retirement on 16.4.04. 

Annual Report 2005 |  37 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

(ii) Equity Options were issued to the Management Team comprising of Messrs R Mosig, A Martin and R Vittino after   shareholder 
approval was received at the Company’s 2003 Annual General Meeting. The value attributed to the Equity Options were calculated using 
the Black Scholes Model based on the following input: 

Grant date share price 
Exercise price 
Exercise volatility 
Option life 
Dividend yield 
Risk-free interest rate 

Issued 11 November 
2003 – 1st tranche 

$0.17 
$0.42 
82% 
5.5 years 
- 
5.136% 

Option Series 
Issued 11 November 
2003 – 2nd tranche 
$0.17 
$0.46 
82% 
5.5 years 
- 
5.136% 

Issued 11 November 
2003 – 3rd tranche 

$0.17 
$0.50 
82% 
5.5 years 
- 
5.136% 

No cash has been paid to the individuals.  The value of the Options will only be realised if and when the market price of Helix shares, as 
quoted by the Australian Stock Exchange, rises above the Exercise Price of the options. Further details of the options are contained in 
note 16 to the financial statements. 

(iii) Messrs R Mosig, A Martin and R Vittino were granted a cash bonus during the year. The payments were made in recognition for 
achievements during the year and were not related to specific targets being met or formed part of employment contracts. Details of the 
payments are listed below: 
• 
• 
• 

Granted on 16 April 2004; 
The payments were cash and taxed accordingly; and 
The  service  and  performance  criteria  used  to  determine  the  amount  of  the  payments  was  reviewed  by  the  remuneration 
committee of the Company and included the acquisition of remaining 50% interest in Gawler Craton JV from AngloGold for $1.5 
million; the completion of a Scoping Study on Area 223 with the results showing an undiscounted pre-tax cash surplus of over 
$62 million before capital costs at an AUD$550 gold price; as well as Corporate achievements. 

2005 

Salary & 
Fees 

Directors 
R W Mosig 
R E Vittino 
G Wheeler 
J denDryver 
G M Folie 
I Macpherson 
B Wauchope 
A R Martin * 
Total 

$ 

156,750 
115,180 
19,267 
18,826 
31,570 
10,857 
9,832 
118,850 
481,132 

Primary 
Perfor-
mance 
Based 
Payment 
$ 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

Non 
Monet-
ary 

Post Employment 
Pre- 
scribed 
Benefits 

Supera- 
nnua-
tion 

Other 
Retire-
ment 
Benefits 
$ 

Equity 
Options 

Other 
Benefits 

Total 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

12,000 
12,000 
- 
- 
2,718 
- 
1,025 
10,639 
38,382 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

27,156 
13,578 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
13,578 
54,312 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

195,906 
140,758 
19,267 
18,826 
34,288 
10,857 
10,857 
143,067 
573,826 

* Mr Martin resigned as director on 30 November 2004 and was appointed as an executive for the period from  1 December 2004 to 30 
June 2005. Remuneration during this period as executive was $72,936. 

16. EXECUTIVE SHARE OPTION PLAN 
As  at  30  June  2005  the  Company  had  issued  3,450,000  share  options  (30  June  2004  3,450,000).  Share  options  carry  no  rights  to 
dividends and no voting rights. The difference between the total market value of options issued during the financial year, at the date of 
issue,  and  the  total  amount  received  from  executives  and  employees  is  not  recognised  in  the  financial  statements  except  for  the 
purposes  of  determining  directors’  and  executives’  remuneration  in  respect  of  that  financial  year.  The  amounts  are  disclosed  in 
remuneration in respect of the financial year in which the entitlement was earned.  
Further details are disclosed below: 

Executive Share Option Plan 

Balance at beginning of financial year    (i) 
Cancelled during the financial year        (ii) 
Granted during the financial year          (iii) 
Exercised during  the financial year      (iv) 
Balance at end of financial year             (v) 

2005 
No. 
3,450,000 
- 
- 
- 
3,450,000 

Weighted average 
exercise price 
$0.46 
- 
- 
- 
$0.46 

2004 
No. 
3,450,000 
(2,200,000) 
2,200,000 
- 
3,450,000 

Weighted average 
exercise price 
$0.46 
$1.00 
$0.46 
- 
$0.46 

38 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

Balance at beginning of financial year 

Options - Series 

No. 

Vested 

Unvested 

Grant Date 

Expiry Date 

Issued 26 May 1999 
Issued 26 May 1999 
Issued 26 May 1999 
Issued 11 Nov 2003 
Issued 11 Nov 2003 
Issued 11 Nov 2003 

416,665 
416,667 
416,668 
733,335 
733,333 
733,332 
3,450,000 

416,665 
416,667 
416,668 

733,335 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
733,333 
733,332 

26/5/99 
26/5/99 
26/5/99 

11/11/03 
11/11/03 
11/11/03 

1,983,335 

1,466,665 

29/3/09 
29/3/09 
29/3/09 

29/3/09 
29/3/09 
29/3/09 

(ii) Cancelled during the financial year 
There were no options cancelled during the year ended 30 June 2005. 

Exercise 
Price 
$ 

$0.42 
$0.46 
$0.50 
$0.42 
$0.46 
$0.50 

Fair value at 
grant date 

Not valued 
Not valued 
Not valued 
9.36c per option 
8.84c per option 
8.37c per option 

Options cancelled during the year ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: 

Options - Series 

No. 

Grant Date 

Expiry Date 

Issued 24 May 2001 
Issued 24 May 2001 
Issued 24 May 2001 

733,335 
733,333 
733,332 
2,200,000 

24/5/01 
24/5/01 
24/5/01 

14/5/05 
14/5/05 
14/5/05 

Exercise Price 
$ 
$0.80 
$1.00 
$1.20 

(iii) Granted during the financial year 
There were no options granted during the year ended 30 June 2005 

Options granted during the year ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: 

Options - Series 

No. 

Grant Date 

Expiry Date 

First Tranche - Issued 11 Nov 2003 
Second Tranche - Issued 11 Nov 2003 
Third Tranche - Issued 11 Nov 2003 

733,335 
733,333 
733,332 
2,200,000 

11/11/03 
11/11/03 
11/11/03 

29/3/09 
 29/3/09 
 29/3/09 

Exercise 
Price 

$0.42 
$0.46 
$0.50 

Fair Value Received 
$ 

- 
- 
- 

(iv)  Exercised during the financial year 
There were no options exercised during the financial years ended 30 June 2005 and 2004.  

(v) Balance at end of the financial year 

      Options – Series 

No. 

Vested 
No. 

Un-
vested 
No. 

Grant 
Date 

Expiry 
Date 

Issued 26 May 1999 
Issued 26 May 1999 
Issued 26 May 1999 

First Tranche - Issued 11 Nov 2003 
Second Tranche - Issued 11 Nov 2003 
Third Tranche - Issued 11 Nov 2003 

416,665 

416,665 

- 

26/5/99 

29/3/09 

416,667 
416,668 
733,335 
733,333 
733,332 
3,450,000 

416,667 
416,668 
733,335 
733,333 
- 
2,716,668 

- 
- 
- 
- 
733,332 
733,332 

26/5/99 
26/5/99 
11/11/03 
11/11/03 
11/11/03 

29/3/09 
29/3/09 
29/3/09 
29/3/09 
29/3/09 

Exer-
cise 
Price 
$ 
$0.42 

$0.46 
$0.50 
$0.42 
$0.46 
$0.50 

Fair value at grant 
date 

Not valued 

Not valued 
Not valued 
9.36c per option 
8.84c per option 
8.37c per option 

Fair value of consideration received is measured as the nominal value of cash receipts on conversion. The fair value of shares at the 
date of their issue is measured as the market value at close of trade on the date of their issue.  
Employee share options carry no rights to dividends and no voting rights. 
The options issued on 26 May 1999 which remain on issue at the end of the financial year ended 30 June 2004 are fully vested. 

Annual Report 2005 |  39 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

In accordance with the Notice of Annual General Meeting 2003, options issued during the year ended 30 June 2004 vest at the following 
dates: 
• 
• 
• 

First tranche of options issued at $0.42 vest immediately. 
Second tranche of options issued at $0.46 vest 12 months from issue date. 
Third tranche of options issued at $0.50 vest 24 months from issue date. 

In accordance with the terms of the executive share option plan, options may be exercised at any time from the date the vesting period 
ends to the date of their expiry. 

The  difference  between  the  total  market  value  of  options  issued  during  a  financial  year,  at  the  date  of  issue,  and  the  total  amount 
received from executives and employees is not recognised in the financial statements except for the purposes of determining directors’ 
and  executives’  remunerations  in  respect  of  that  financial  year  as  disclosed  in  note  15  to  the  financial  statements.  The  amounts  are 
disclosed in remuneration in respect of the financial years over which the entitlement was earned.  

Consideration received on the exercise of executive options is recognised in contributed equity. During the financial year no options were 
exercised, hence no amount was recognised in contributed equity arising from the exercise of executive options (2004: $nil) 

17.   RELATED PARTY AND DIRECTORS’ DISCLOSURES 

  a)  Other Transactions with Specified Directors 

The loss from ordinary activities before income tax includes the following items of expenses that resulted from transactions 
other than remuneration with specified directors or their personally-related entities. Transactions between related parties are 
on normal commercial terms and conditions unless otherwise stated.  

(i)  During the year, Ord Partners provided professional services to the value of $16,166 (2004 $13,089) payable within 30 days 

from date of invoice (net of GST).  Mr I K Macpherson, a Director, has significant influence in Ord Partners. 

  Greg Wheeler Consulting Pty Ltd provided professional services to the value of $10,000 (2004 nil) payable within 30 days 
from date of invoice (net of GST).  Mr Greg Wheeler, a Director, has significant influence in Greg Wheeler Consulting Pty Ltd. 

    There were no balances outstanding at 30 June 2005 to either Mr I K Macpherson or Mr Greg Wheeler. 

b) Specified Directors’ Equity Holdings   

Fully paid ordinary shares issued by Helix Resources Limited 

Balance @ 
1/7/04 

Granted as 
remuneration 

No. 

No. 

Received on 
exercise of 
options 
No. 

Net other 
change 

Balance @ 
30/6/05 

Balance held 
nominally 

No. 

No. 

No. 

Specified Directors 

R W Mosig 

R E Vittino 

G Wheeler 

J den Dryver 

A R Martin 

I K Macpherson 

B Wauchope 

Total 

2,484,846 

442,500 

- 

- 

262,095 

267,667 

962,449 

4,419,557 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-  

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-  

- 

2,484,846 

457,500 

753,880 

- 

- 

(267,667) 

(962,449) 

(18,736) 

900,000 

753,880 

- 

262,095 

- 

- 

4,400,821 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

It should be noted that Messrs Macpherson and Wauchope resigned on 30 November 2004 and therefore the balance of securities held 
as at 30 June 2005 is nil as they are no longer specified directors and therefore the net change of 1,230,116 is not as a result of the sale 
of any securities whilst a specified directors. 

40 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

Listed Share Options issued by Helix Resources Limited 
Bal @ 1/7/04 

Granted as 
remuneration 

Exercised 

Other change 

Bal @ 30/6/05 

Balance held 
nominally 

No. 

No. 

No. 

No. 

No. 

No. 

Specified 
Directors 
R W Mosig 

R E Vittino 

G.Wheeler 

J. den Dryver 
A R Martin 

I K Macpherson 

B Wauchope 

Total 

857,516 

614,271 

- 

- 
85,538 

182,002 

120,306 

1,859,633 

- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

(182,002) 

(120,306) 

(302,308) 

857,516 

614,271 

- 

- 
85,538 

- 

- 

1,557,325 

- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

- 

It should be noted that Messrs Macpherson and Wauchope resigned on 30 November 2004 and therefore the balance of securities held 
as at 30 June 2005 is nil as they are no longer specified directors and therefore the net change of 302,308 is not as a result of the sale of 
any securities whilst a specified director. 

Executive Share Options issued by Helix Resources Limited 
Other 
change 

Bal @ 
1/7/04 

Exer-
cised 

Granted 
as re-
munerat
ion 

Bal @ 
30/6/05 

Bal vested 
@ 30/6/05 

No. 

No. 

No. 

No. 

No. 

No. 

Vested 
but not 
exer-
cise-
able  
No. 

Vested 
and exer-
cisable 

Options 
vested 
during 
year  

No. 

No. 

Specified 
Directors 
R W Mosig 
R E Vittino 
G Wheeler 
J denDryver 
A R Martin 

Total 

1,600,000 
900,000 
- 
- 
950,000 

3,450,000 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

1,600,000 
900,000 
- 
- 
950,000 

1,233,334 
716,667 
- 
- 
766,667 

3,450,000 

2,716,668 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 

1,233,334 
716,667 
- 
- 
766,667 

366,667 
183,333 
- 
- 
183,333 

2,716,668 

733,333 

Each executive share option converts into 1 ordinary share of Helix Resources Limited on exercise. No amounts are paid or payable by 
the recipient on receipt of the option. 

During the financial year, no executive share options were exercised by specified directors and executives.  

MR R.W. Mosig, Mr A.R. Martin and MR R.E. Vittino were issued options on 11 November 2003.  The fair value of the options issued 
were as follows: 

Mr R.W. Mosig    

Messrs A R Martin & R E Vittino  

366,667 options @ 9.36c (first tranche) 
366,667 options @ 8.84c  (second tranche) 
366,667 options @ 8.37c  (third tranche) 

183,334 options @ 9.36c (first tranche) 
183,334 options @ 8.84c (second tranche) 
183,334 options @ 8.37c (third tranche) 

Further details of the options granted during the year are contained in note 15 and 16 to the financial statements. 

Annual Report 2005 |  41 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                             
 
 
                             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

18.  INCOME TAX 

CONSOLIDATED   
2004 

2005 

COMPANY 

2005 

2004 

Loss before income tax   

(1,297,895) 

 (4,769,008) 

(1,297,895) 

 (4,769,008) 

Income Tax Expense:   

Income tax expense/(benefit) calculated at 30% 

(389,369) 

 (1,430,702) 

(389,369) 

 (1,430,702) 

(Increase)/Decrease in income tax benefit due to: 
- non-deductible expenses 
- Share issue costs deductible 

4,739 
(7,111) 

71,884 
- 

4,739 
(7,111) 

71,884 
- 

Benefit of tax losses not brought to account as an asset 

391,741 

1,358,818 

391,741 

1,358,818 

Income tax expense attributable to operating loss 

- 

 - 

- 

 - 

As of  30 June 2005, the parent entity and its controlled entities have future income tax benefits not brought to account as assets in 
relation to tax losses of the parent entity of $10,200,380 (2004: $9,996,914), Consolidated entity of  $10,797,624 (2004: $10,627,104), 
available to offset against future year's taxable income.  The benefit will only be obtained if: 
a) 

the  Company  and  Consolidated  entity  derives  future  assessable  income  of  a  nature  and  of  an  amount  sufficient  to  enable  the 
benefits from the deductions for the losses to be realised; 
the Company and Consolidated entity continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law; and 
no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the companies in realising the benefit from the deductions for the losses. 

b) 
c) 
Legislation to allow groups, comprising a parent entity and its Australian resident wholly-owned entities, to elect to consolidate and be 
treated as a single entity for income tax purposes was substantively enacted on 21 October 2002.  This legislation, which includes both 
mandatory and elective elements, is applicable to the company. 

At the date of this report the directors have not assessed the financial effect, if any, the legislation may have on the company and the 
consolidated entity and, accordingly, the directors have not made a decision whether or not to elect to be taxed as a single entity.The 
financial effect of the implementation of the tax consolidation system on the Company and Consolidated entity has not been recognised 
in the financial statements.  

19.  SEGMENT INFORMATION 
The Consolidated entity operated predominantly in one geographical segment and one business, being platinum, gold and other base 
metals exploration and development in Western Australia, South Australia and New South Wales.  

20. EARNINGS PER SHARE 

Basic loss per share 

Diluted loss per share 

COMPANY  

2005 
Cents per share 

2004 
Cents per share 

(1.84) 

(1.84) 

(8.28) 

(8.28) 

The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share are as follows: 

Earnings / (Loss) (a) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (b) 

70.613,737 

62,866,808 

(a) 

Earnings used in the calculation of basic earnings per share is net loss after tax of $1,297,895 (2004:$4,769,008) 

2005 
No 

2004 
No 

42 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

(b) The staff and listed options are considered to be potential ordinary shares and are therefore excluded from the weighted average 
number of shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share.  Where dilutive, potential ordinary shares are included in the 
calculation of diluted earnings per share (refer below). 

Diluted Loss per Share 

The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary and potential ordinary shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per 
share are as follows: 

Earnings (a) 

(1,297,895) 

(4,769,008) 

2005 
$ 

2004 
$ 

Weighted  average  number  of  ordinary  shares  and 
potential ordinary shares (b) 

12 months to 30 June 2005 
No. 

12 months to 30 June 2004 
No. 

70,613,737 

62,866,808 

(a) Earnings used in the calculation of diluted loss per share is net loss after tax of $1,297,895 (2004: $4,769,008). 

(b) The following potential ordinary shares are not dilutive and are therefore excluded from the weighted average number of ordinary 
shares and potential ordinary shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share: 

Staff options 

Listed options 

2005 

No. 

3,450,000 

16,437,863 

2004 

No. 

3,450,000 

16,437,863 

INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURES 

21. 
The parent entity has entered into the following unincorporated joint ventures: 

Joint Venture Project 

Percentage Interest 

Principal Exploration Activities 

Menzies 

Loongana 

Pilbara Diamonds 

Tunkillia 

Yalleen 

38%(2004: 49%) Diluting (Heron Resources Limited 62%) 

Nickel 

90%(2004:  90%)  Diluting  (J  A  Bunting  &  Associates  Pty  Ltd 
10%) 
100%(2004:100%) Diluting (DeBeers Australia Exploration 
Limited) 
100% (2004: nil) Diluting (Mintoaur Exploration) 

100% (2004: nil) Diluting (API Management Pty Ltd) 

Platinum Group Metals 

Diamonds 

Gold 

Iron Ore 

The joint ventures are not separate legal entities but are contractual arrangements between the participants for sharing costs and output 
and do not in themselves generate revenue and profit. Exploration expenditure is the only asset of the joint ventures.  The consolidated 
entity’s interest in exploration expenditure in the above mentioned joint ventures is included in note 6 and at 30 June 2005 is $399,220 
(2004 : $655,175). 

Annual Report 2005 |  43 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

22.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and 
the basis on which revenues and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity 
instrument are disclosed in Note 1 to the financial statements. 
The Consolidated entity's exposure to interest rate risk and effective weighted average interest rate for classes of financial assets is set 
out below: 

Average 
Interest 
Rate 

5.07% 

5.17% 

Fixed 
Interest 
Rate 
$ 

- 
- 
1,635,673 

- 

1,635,673 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
5.25% 

5.00% 

- 
- 
1,634,257 

- 

1,634,257 

Floating Interest Rate 
Maturity  

   Less than 

1 year 

More than 
1 Year 

$ 

- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

236,897 

236,897 

149,242 

149,242 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

227,686 

227,686 

136,779 

136,779 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

Non 
 Interest 
Bearing 
$ 

41,699 
890 
200 

- 

42,789 

214,856 
77,913 
292,769 

34,539 
163,391 
200 

- 

198,130 

159,252 
271,829 
431,081 

Total 

$ 

41,699 
890 
1,635,873 

386,139 

2,064,601 

214,856 
77,913 
292,769 

34,539 
163,391 
1,634,457 

364,465 

2,196,852 

159,252 
271,829 
431,081 

2005 
Financial Assets 
Other Receivables 
Investments 
Cash assets 
Security deposits and deposits 
at financial institutions 

Financial Liabilities 
Trade Payables 
Employee Entitlements 

2004 
Financial Assets 
Other Receivables 
Investments 
Cash assets 
Security deposits and deposits 
at financial insitutions 

Financial Liabilities 
Trade Payables 
Employee Entitlements 

Other than those classes of assets and liabilities denoted as "listed" in note 4, none of the classes of financial assets and liabilities are 
readily traded on organised markets in standardised form. 

c) Credit Risk 
Credit Risk refers to the risk that counterparty will default on, its contractual  obligations resulting in financial loss to the Consolidated 
entity.  The Consolidated entity has adopted the policy of only dealing with credit worthy counterparties and obtaining sufficient collateral 
or other security where appropriate, as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults.  The Consolidated entity measures 
risk on a fair value basis. 

The  maximum  credit  risk  on  financial  assets  of  the  Consolidated  entity  which  have  been  recognised  on  the  statement  of  financial 
position, other than investments in shares, is generally the carrying amount, net of any provisions for doubtful debts. 

d) Net Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities 
The net fair value of cash and cash equivalents and non-interest bearing monetary financial assets and financial liabilities approximates 
their carrying value. 

The net fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities is based upon market prices where a market exists or by discounting the 
expected future cash flows by the current interest rates for assets and liabilities with similar risk profiles. 

Listed equity investments have been valued by reference to market prices prevailing at balance date. The market value of listed equity 
investments  has  been  disclosed  in  Note  4  to  the  financial  statements.  For  unlisted  equity  investments,  the  net  fair  value  is  an 
assessment by the Directors based on the underlying net assets, future maintainable earnings and any special circumstances pertaining 
to a particular investment. 

44 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

23. EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS 
 The aggregate employee entitlement liability recognized and included in the financial statements is as follows: 

Provision for employee entitlements: 

Current (Note 8) 

Non-Current (Note 8) 

Number of employees at end of finan-
cial year 

24. REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS 

a) Auditor of the Parent Entity 

Auditing the financial report 

Taxation services 

Other services – A-IFRS 

CONSOLIDATED 

COMPANY 

2005 

$ 

 2004 

$ 

2005 

$ 

2004 

$ 

67,375 

10,538 

77,913 

59,313 

212,516 

271,829 

67,375 

10,538 

77,913 

59,313 

212,516 

271,829 

No 

8 

2005 

$ 

No 

9 

2004 

$ 

No 

8 

2005 

$ 

No 

9 

2004 

$ 

27,000 

6,300 

7,700 

41,000 

39,000 

7,700 

2,300 

49,000 

27,000 

6,300 

7,700 

41,000 

39,000 

7,700 

2,300 

49,000 

The auditor of Helix Resources Limited is Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. 

25. IMPACTS OF ADOPTING THE AUSTRALIAN EQUIVALENTS TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS 
The  Australian  Accounting  Standards  Board  (AASB)  has  issued  Australian  equivalents  to  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards 
(“A-IFRS”) for application to reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. Helix Resources Limited has commenced reviewing 
the transition from its current policies to A-IFRS. The adoption of A-IFRS will be first reflected in the financial statements for the half-year 
ending 31 December 2005 and the year ending 30 June 2006.  

Under AASB1 the Company and Consolidated Entity, in complying with A-IFRS for the first time is required to restate its comparative 
financial statements to amounts reflecting the application of A-IFRS to that comparative period. Most adjustments required on transition 
to A-IFRS will be made, retrospectively, against opening retained earnings as at 1 July 2004. 

At the date of this financial report, the Company and Consolidated Entity have substantially completed the assessment of accounting 
policy  alternatives  on  transition  to  A-IFRS,  and  A-IFRS  accounting  policies  that  will  be  adopted  from  1  July  2005.    In  addition,  the 
Company and Consolidated Entity are in the process of completing its analysis of the likely impact on the results and financial position of 
the Company and Consolidated Entity. 

Key areas where accounting policies are likely to change and may impact on the financial statements of the Company and Consolidated 
Entity include the following: 

(a)     Capitalisation of Exploration and Evaluation Costs  
AASB  6  Exploration  for  and  Evaluation  of  Mineral  Resources  permits  the  area  of  interest  method  of  accounting  to  continue  for 
exploration  and  evaluation  expenditure  and  thus  AASB  6  should  provide  outcomes  consistent  with  those  under  the  existing  standard 
AASB 1022 Accounting for the Extractive Industries in accounting for the initial recognition of exploration and evaluation assets.   

Annual Report 2005 |  45 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Notes to the Financial Statements 
for the Financial Year Ended 30 June 2005 

In  addition,  AASB  6  requires  an  annual  assessment  of  impairment  for  exploration  and  evaluation  assets  using  four  indicators  of 
impairment.  These indicators are consistent with the initial recognition criteria of the existing standard and thus it is not expected that 
there will be a significant impact on results arising from the impairment testing requirements. 

(b)     Income Tax  
In accordance with Australian Standard AASB 112 Income Taxes, deferred tax balances are determined using the balance sheet method 
which calculates temporary differences based on the carrying amounts of the Company’s and Consolidated Entity’s assets and liabilities 
in the statement of financial position and their associated tax bases. This represents a fundamental change to the way the Company and 
Consolidated  Entity    currently  calculates  its  tax  balances,  where  deferred  tax  balances  are  determined  using  the  income  statement 
method.      The  Company  is  currently  evaluating  the  impacts  of  AASB  112  on  the  financial  statements  of  the  company  and  the 
consolidated entity.  The Company and Consolidated Entity have carried forward tax losses which have not been recognised as deferred 
tax assets in the 30 June 2005 financial statements as they do not satisfy the ‘virtually certain’ criteria under current Australian GAAP.  
Although the Company’s evaluation of the impacts of AASB 112 is not complete, the Company believes that these losses will also not be 
recognised as deferred tax assets under A-IFRS because at this stage it is believed that they will not meet the ‘probable’ recognition 
criteria under A-IFRS.  The Company and Consolidated Entity may also be required to recognised additional deferred tax liabilities on 
transition to A-IFRS, however the impacts, if any, is not yet determinable. 

(c)     Provision for Rehabilitation and Restoration  
In  accordance  with  Australian  Standard  AASB  137  Provisions,  Contingent  Liabilities  and  Contingent  Assets,  the    Company  and 
Consolidated Entity will be required to fully provide, based on discounted future cash flows, for rehabilitation and restoration where there 
is  a  legal  or  constructive  obligation.  A  corresponding  asset,  net  of  depreciation  to  the  date  of  transition  will  be  recognised  and  be 
depreciated together with development assets. The Company and Consolidated Entity will be required to recognise the unwinding of the 
discount in relation to the provision applied directly as an interest expense.  As the Company performs restoration activity on a continuing 
basis, the impact of these changes are likely to be immaterial. 

 (d)     Share Based Payments  
Under Australian Standard AASB 2 Share-based Payment, the Company and Consolidated Entity will be required to determine the fair 
value of options issued to employees and recognise an expense in the Statement of Financial Performance. For options on issue on the 
application of AASB 2 an adjustment for their recognition will be made against opening retained earnings.  The consolidated entity had 
733,332 share options that were issued on 11 November 2003 and unvested as at 1 January 2005. 

As a consequence share based payment expense will increase by $30,690 (Consolidated Entity $30,690) for the year ended 30 June 
2005 and be recognised as an employee equity – settled benefit reserve. The increase in the opening accumulated loss at 1 July 2004 in 
respect of years prior to fiscal 2005 will be $19,507.  
The Company and Consolidated Entity will not be recognising share options issued on 11 November 2003 and vested prior to 1 January 
2005 as permitted by AASB1. 

Revenue 

(e) 
Although not impacting upon the profit of the Company and Consolidated Entity, the adoption of A-IFRS will result in a number of 
transactions being recorded on a “net” rather than “gross” basis.  In addition the adoption of A-IFRS results in the reclassification of 
proceeds from the sale of non current assets from “revenue from ordinary activities” to “other income and expense” items in the 
statement of financial performance. 
As a consequence, proceeds from the sale of investments will decrease by $284,595 (Company $284,595) and the written down value of 
investments disposed will decrease by $108,000 (Company $108,000). The difference is a gain on sale of non current assets of 
$176,595 (Company $176,595) which will be recognized for the financial year ended 30 June 2005 as part of “other income”.  This is a 
reclassification and will not impact upon the profit and loss of the Company and Consolidated Entity. 

Financial Instruments 

(f) 
The Company and Consolidated Entity have elected not to retrospectively apply AASB132 and 139.  Accordingly there are no financial 
impacts on the financial statements in relation to these two standards as at 30 June 2005. 

Property, plant and equipment 

(g) 
On initial adoption of A-IFRS items of plant and equipment are measured at the A-IFRS cost.  The directors have not elected to use fair 
value or revaluation as deemed cost to measure an item of property, plant and equipment. 

26. ADDITIONAL COMPANY INFORMATION 
Helix Resources Limited is a listed public company, incorporated and operating in Australia. 
Registered Office 
9 Richardson Street 
WEST PERTH  WA 6005  
Tel (08) 9321 2644 

Principal Place of Business 
9 Richardson Street 
WEST PERTH  WA  6005 
Tel (08) 9321 2644 

46 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shareholding Information 
Analysis of Shareholders as at 5th September 2005 

NUMBER OF SHARES HELD 

Spread of Holdings 

1–1000 
1,001–5,000 
5,001–10,000 
10,001–100,000 
100,001and over 
Total 

Number of Share-
holders 

Number of Shares 

587 
816 
428 
743 
107 
2,681 

342,982 
2,304,665 
3,629,588 
25,866,979 
44,516,516 
76,660,730 

Number of shareholders holdingless than a marketable parcel                                                           1,153 

      1,530,474 

PERCENTAGE HELD BY 20 LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS 

1 
2 
3 
4 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19. 
20. 

Shareholder 
Yandal Investments Pty Ltd 
Cairnglen Investments Pty Ltd 
National Nominees Limited 
Invia Custodian Pty Ltd 
Colter Holdings Group 
AngloGold Australia Limited 
Niddrie Holdings Pty Limited 
ANZ Nominees Limited 
Zero Nominees Pty Ltd 
Blamco Trading Pty Ltd 
Nefco Nominees Pty Ltd 
Mr. Maxwell Alfred Kippe 
Equities Trustees Limited 
Mr. Abdelaziz Soliman 
Irrewarra Investments Pty Ltd 
Gee Vee Pty Ltd 
Mr. John Egan 
Yan’s Investments Pty Ltd 
Mr. John Halaska 
Mr. Philip Broadley 
Top 20 Total 

Shares 

6,734,406 
5,118,912 
3,083,158 
2,928,362 
2,547,179 
1,666,667 
1,129,115 
1,014,448 
886,667 
850,000 
674,367 
600,000 
521,250 
510,000 
480,942 
453,880 
450,000 
450,000 
419,622 
407,668 
30,926,643 

% 
8.78 
6.68 
4.02 
3.82 
3.32 
2.17 
1.47 
1.32 
1.16 
1.11 
0.88 
0.78 
0.68 
0.67 
0.63 
0.59 
0.59 
0.59 
0.55 
0.53 
40.32 

VOTING RIGHTS 
One vote for each ordinary share held in accordance with the Company's Constitution. 

SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS 

Shareholder 

 Cairnglen Investments Pty Ltd 
 Yandal Investments Pty Ltd 

DIRECTORS' INTEREST IN SHARE CAPITAL 

DIRECTORS’ SHAREHOLDINGS 

Director 

R W Mosig 

R E Vittino 

G J Wheeler 

J den Dryver 

Shares 

7,268,024 
6,734,406 

% of 

Issued Capital 
9.48 
8.78 

Fully Paid 

Listed Options 

Staff Options 

Ordinary Shares 

2,548,179 

900,000 

753,880 

-- 

4,202,059 

857,516 

614,271 

-- 

-- 

1,600,000 

900,000 

-- 

-- 

1,471,787 

2,500,000 

Annual Report 2005 |  47 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Shareholding Information 
Analysis of Optionholders as at 5th September 2005 

NUMBER OF OPTIONS HELD 

Spread of Holdings 

Number of Option Holders 

Number of Options 

1–1000 

1,001–5,000 

5,001–10,000 

10,001–100,000 

100,001and over 
TOTAL 

PERCENTAGE HELD BY 20 LARGEST OPTIONHOLDERS 

234 

261 

101 

156 

36 
788 

110,296 

679,091 

762,573 

4,807,768 

10,078,135 
16,437,883 

Optionholder 

Options 

% 

AngloGold Australia Limited 

1,287,281 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

Colter Holdings Group 

Mr Shaun Redmond 

City Corp Pty Ltd 

Zero Nominees Pty Ltd 

Mr. Abdelaziz Soliman 

Technica Pty Ltd 

Yandal Investments Pty Ltd 

Mr. John Halaska 

10,  Mr BJ Collins & Mrs SL Collins 

11.  Mr. Andrew Bruce Doak 

12.  Mr SM Baker 

13.  Mr CD Rose 

14. 

15. 

16. 

Arco Four Investments Pty Ltd 

Truwest Pty Ltd 

ANZ Nominees Limited 

17.  Mr. Neil John Strong 

18. 

19. 

20. 

Karalco Pty Ltd 

Invia Custodian Pty Ltd 

Jomot Pty Ltd 

Top 20 Total 

857,182 

600,000 

600,000 

599,800 

510,000 

484,703 

411,470 

330,417 

300,000 

300,000 

254,259 

250,000 

250,000 

236,168 

232,927 

230,000 

217,500 

210,000 

202,963 

7.83 

5.21 

3.65 

3.65 

3.65 

3.10 

2.95 

2.50 

2.01 

1.82 

1.82 

1.55 

1.52 

1.52 

1.44 

1.42 

1.40 

1.32 

1.28 

1.23 

8,161,707 

50.87 

The above listed options are due to expire on 30 November 2005 and are exercisable at $0.25 each. 

48 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
Tenement Schedule 
as at 30th June 2005 

Tenement Type and Number  Name 

Mineral 

Ownership 

WESTERN AUSTRALIA 

ELA47/1144 

ELA47/1145 

ELA47/1146 

EL09/644 

ELA09/1079 

MLA09/87 

MLA09/88 

PLA09/424 

PLA09/425 

PLA09/426 

PLA09/427 

EL38/1477 

EL38/1478 

ELA38/1807 

ELA38/1808 

EL69/1516 

EL69/1517 

EL69/1718 

EL69/1719 

EL69/1720 

PL69/34 

PL69/35 

PL69/36 

PL69/37 

EL29/139* 

MLA29/214 

EL29/139* 

MLA29/171 

MLA29/173 

MLA29/215 

MLA29/216 

MLA29/217 

MLA29/218 

MLA29/219 

MLA29/220 

MLA29/226 

MLA29/227 

Elvire 

Elvire 

Elvire 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Glenburgh 

Isolated Hill 

Isolated Hill 

Diamonds/Basemetals 

Helix Resources Limited 100%  

Diamonds/Basemetals 

DeBeers Australia Exploration earning 51% of Dia-

Diamonds/Basemetals 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold, Nickel 

Gold, Nickel 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Lake Throssell 

Base Metals 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Loongana 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Menzies 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

J A Bunting & Assoc Pty Ltd 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Joint Venture (Helix 90%) 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Inco (earning 51%) 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Gold, PGM, Base metals 

Menzies Nickel Joint Venture 

(*Heron Resources NL 62%, Helix 38% diluting) 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Nickel 

Nickel 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Abbreviations and Definitions used in Schedule: 

EL 

ML 

PL 

Exploration Licence 

Mining Lease 

Prospecting Licence 

ELA 

MLA 

PLA 

Exploration Licence Application 

Mining Lease Application 

Prospecting Licence Application 

Annual Report 2005 |  49 

 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tenement Schedule 
as at 30th June 2005 

Tenement Type and Number  Name 

Mineral 

Ownership 

WESTERN AUSTRALIA 

EL38/1000 

Mt Venn 

PGM, Nickel 

Helix 80% Kelray Resources NL 20% 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Helix Resources 100% 

West Pilbara Joint Venture 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

DeBeers Australia Exploration  

Limited earning 51% 

ELA38/1476 

ELA38/1775 

ML47/123 

ML47/124 

ML47/125 

ML47/126 

ML47/141 

ML47/142 

ML47/143 

ML47/144 

MLA47/569 

ELA47/1089 

ELA47/1090 

EL47/905 

EL47/1015 

EL47/1074 

MLA47/693 

MLA47/786 

MLA47/787 

MLA47/788 

MLA47/789 

MLA47/790 

MLA47/791 

MLA47/792 

MLA47/793 

MLA47/570 

MLA47/571 

MLA47/572 

MLA47/573 

MLA47/574 

MLA47/639 

MLA47/640 

MLA47/641 

MLA47/642 

MLA47/643 

Mt Venn 

Mt Venn 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

PGM 

Munni Munni South  PGM 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni South  Diamonds 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Munni Munni 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Diamonds 

Abbreviations and Definitions used in Schedule: 

EL 

ML 

PL 

Exploration Licence 

Mining Lease 

Prospecting Licence 

ELA 

MLA 

PLA 

Exploration Licence Application 

Mining Lease Application 

Prospecting Licence Application 

50 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED 

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tenement Schedule 
as at 30th June 2005 

Tenement Type and Number  Name 

Mineral 

Ownership 

WESTERN AUSTRALIA 

EL51/946 

EL52/1495 

EL52/1496 

EL52/1623 

EL52/1624 

EL52/1625 

EL52/1626 

ELA47/1169 

ELA47/1170 

ELA47/1171 

Narracoota 

Narracoota 

Narracoota 

Perry Creek 

Perry Creek 

Perry Creek 

Perry Creek 

Yalleen 

Yalleen 

Yalleen 

SOUTH AUSTRALIA 

ELA2005/20 

EL2854 

EL3335 

NEW SOUTH WALES 

Lake Everard 

Lake Everard West 

Childarra 

J A Bunting & Assoc Pty Ltd 

Joint Venture (Helix 90%) 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Gold 

Gold 

Gold 

Base Metals 

Base Metals 

Base Metals 

Base Metals 

Pecious and Base Metals 

Helix Resources Limited 100%, 

Pecious and Base Metals 

API limited earning 51% (Iron ore) 

Pecious and Base Metals 

DBAE limited earning 51% (Diamonds) 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Minotaur Exploration earning 51%  

EL6228 

Fifield 

Helix Resources Limited 100% 

Abbreviations and Definitions used in Schedule: 

EL 

ML 

PL 

Exploration Licence 

Mining Lease 

Prospecting Licence 

ELA 

MLA 

PLA 

Exploration Licence Application 

Mining Lease Application 

Prospecting Licence Application 

Annual Report 2005 |  51 

 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Directory 

Directors 

Robert W Mosig 

Executive Chairman 

Riccardo E Vittino -   Executive Director and Company Secretary 

Greg Wheeler  

Non Executive Director 

John den Dryver 

Non Executive Director 

Australian Business Number 

27 009 138 738 

Head and Registered Office  

9 Richardson Street 

West Perth Western Australia 6005 

PO Box 825 West Perth Western Australia 6872 

Telephone:  +61 8 9321 2644 

Facsimilie: 

+61 8 9321 3909 

Email:  

helix@helix.net.au 

Website: 

http://helix.net.au 

Share Registry 

Advanced Share Registry 

110 Stirling Highway 

Nedlands Western Australia 6009 

PO Box 1156 Nedlands Western Australia 6909 

Telephone:  +61 8 9389 8033 

Facsimilie: 

+61 8 9389 7871 

Auditor 

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 

Woodside Plaze Level 14, 240 St George’s Tce 

Perth Western Australia 6000 

Telephone:  +61 8 9365 7000 

Facsimilie: 

+61 8 9365 7001 

Stock Exchange 

The Company Securities are quoted on the  

Australian Stock Exchange Limited 

CODE: HLX and HLXOA 

52 | HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED