Helmerich & Payne
Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2012 4DEC201212435137 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is the holding Company for Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., a drilling contractor with land and offshore operations in the United States, South America, Africa and the Middle East. Holdings also include commercial real estate properties in the Tulsa, Oklahoma area, and an energy-weighted portfolio of securities valued at approximately $452 million as of September 30, 2012. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 13DEC200618042693 Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted Earnings per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends Paid per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (in thousands, except per share amounts) $2,543,894 434,186 3.99 .250 694,264 5,003,891 $3,151,802 581,045 5.34 .280 1,097,680 5,721,085 $1,875,162 156,312 1.45 .210 329,572 4,265,370 Financial & Operating Review HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME*† Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 Operating Revenues Operating Costs, excluding depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and Administrative Expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and Dividend Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on Sale of Investment Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest Expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted Earnings Per Common Share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,151,802 $2,543,894 $1,875,162 1,071,959 262,658 81,479 451,796 1,811 — 17,158 286,081 156,312 1,432,602 315,468 91,452 702,511 1,951 913 17,355 434,668 434,186 1,750,510 387,549 107,307 909,599 1,380 — 8,653 573,609 581,045 Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.27 5.34 3.99 3.99 2.66 1.45 * † ** $000’s omitted, except per share data All data excludes discontinued operations except net income 2004 includes an asset impairment of $51,516 and depreciation of $88,075 SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA* Cash† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Working Capital† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96,095 $ 364,246 $ 511,574 451,144 4,351,571 5,721,085 195,000 3,834,998 1,097,680 537,034 347,924 3,677,070 5,003,891 235,000 3,270,047 694,264 63,020 417,888 320,712 3,275,020 4,265,370 360,000 2,807,465 329,572 * † $000’s omitted Excludes discontinued operations Rig Fleet Summary† Drilling Rigs— U. S. Land—FlexRigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U. S. Land—Highly Mobile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U. S. Land—Conventional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Offshore Platform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Land† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Rig Fleet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig Utilization Percentage— U. S. Land—FlexRigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U. S. Land—Highly Mobile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U. S. Land—Conventional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U. S. Land—All Rigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Offshore Platform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Land† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 — 18 9 29 320 97 0 14 89 79 77 221 4 23 9 24 281 99 0 16 86 77 70 182 11 27 9 28 257 87 0 17 73 80 71 † Excludes discontinued operations 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 $1,843,740 944,780 227,535 58,822 608,875 2,755 — 13,590 380,546 353,545 $1,869,371 987,838 195,343 56,429 640,084 3,524 21,994 18,721 420,258 461,738 $1,502,380 788,967 137,187 47,401 586,506 4,143 65,458 9,591 415,924 449,261 $1,140,219 606,945 93,363 51,873 395,341 9,688 19,866 6,499 269,852 293,858 $ 733,902 435,057 88,483 41,015 182,355 5,772 26,969 12,416 120,666 127,606 $ 532,759 375,600 139,591 37,661 (14,698) 1,622 25,418 12,541 (1,016) 4,359 $ 472,407 322,553 76,748 41,003 35,845 2,467 5,529 12,357 16,417 17,873 $ 472,865 319,330 56,208 36,563 61,946 3,624 24,820 993 55,017 63,517 3.56 3.31 3.93 4.32 3.95 4.27 2.54 2.77 1.16 1.23 (0.01) 0.04 0.17 0.17 0.54 0.63 $ 96,142 157,103 356,404 3,194,273 4,161,024 420,000 2,683,009 876,839 $ 77,549 274,519 199,266 2,605,384 3,588,045 475,000 2,265,474 697,906 $ 67,445 209,766 223,360 2,068,812 2,885,369 445,000 1,815,516 885,583 $ 32,193 126,540 218,309 1,399,974 2,134,712 175,000 1,381,892 521,847 $ 284,460 378,496 178,452 897,504 1,663,350 200,000 1,079,238 78,677 $ 63,785 157,266 161,532 913,338 1,406,844 200,000 914,110 86,057 $ 29,763 82,712 158,770 983,026 1,417,770 200,000 917,251 233,850 $ 45,699 87,584 150,175 824,815 1,227,313 100,000 895,170 298,295 163 11 27 9 33 243 76 29 39 68 89 70 146 12 27 9 19 213 100 83 80 96 75 72 118 12 27 9 16 182 100 93 87 97 65 89 73 12 28 9 16 138 100 100 95 99 69 95 50 12 29 11 14 116 100 99 82 94 53 80 48 11 28 11 19 117 99 91 67 87 48 47 43 11 29 12 21 116 97 89 58 81 51 42 26 11 29 12 19 97 96 97 70 84 83 59 (This page has been left blank intentionally.) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (cid:2) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 OR (cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-4221 HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 73-0679879 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1437 S. Boulder Ave., Suite 1400, Tulsa, Oklahoma (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 74119-3623 (Zip Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: (918) 742-5531 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code Title of Each Class Common Stock ($0.10 par value) Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer (cid:2) Accelerated filer (cid:3) Smaller reporting company (cid:3) Non-accelerated filer (cid:3) (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) At March 30, 2012, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates was $5,455,241,646 Number of shares of common stock outstanding at November 15, 2012: 105,728,157 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Certain portions of the following documents have been incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K as indicated: 10-K Parts Documents (1) Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 6, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . Parts I and II Part III DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THIS REPORT INCLUDES ‘‘FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS’’ WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. ALL STATEMENTS OTHER THAN STATEMENTS OF HISTORICAL FACTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, STATEMENTS REGARDING THE REGISTRANT’S FUTURE FINANCIAL POSITION, BUSINESS STRATEGY, BUDGETS, PROJECTED COSTS AND PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OF MANAGEMENT FOR FUTURE OPERATIONS, ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS GENERALLY CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS ‘‘MAY’’, ‘‘WILL’’, ‘‘EXPECT’’, ‘‘INTEND’’, ‘‘ESTIMATE’’, ‘‘ANTICIPATE’’, ‘‘BELIEVE’’, OR ‘‘CONTINUE’’ OR THE NEGATIVE THEREOF OR SIMILAR TERMINOLOGY. ALTHOUGH THE REGISTRANT BELIEVES THAT THE EXPECTATIONS REFLECTED IN SUCH FORWARD- LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, IT CAN GIVE NO ASSURANCE THAT SUCH EXPECTATIONS WILL PROVE TO BE CORRECT. IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE REGISTRANT’S EXPECTATIONS ARE DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT UNDER THE CAPTION ‘‘RISK FACTORS’’ BEGINNING ON PAGE 6, AS WELL AS IN MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ON, PAGES 39 THROUGH 53 OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT. ALL SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN AND ORAL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE REGISTRANT, OR PERSONS ACTING ON ITS BEHALF, ARE EXPRESSLY QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY SUCH CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS. THE REGISTRANT ASSUMES NO DUTY TO UPDATE OR REVISE ITS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN INTERNAL ESTIMATES OR EXPECTATIONS OR OTHERWISE, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW. i HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. FORM 10-K YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 2. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 3. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 4. Executive Officers of the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Item 6. Item 7. Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Item 9. Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9A. Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV Page 1 6 12 13 21 21 22 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 28 29 29 29 29 29 30 35 ii (This page has been left blank intentionally.) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 PART I Item 1. BUSINESS Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Company’’, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 3, 1940, and is successor to a business originally organized in 1920. We are primarily engaged in contract drilling of oil and gas wells for others and this business accounts for almost all of our operating revenues. Our contract drilling business is composed of three reportable business segments: U.S. Land, Offshore and International Land. During fiscal 2012, our U.S. Land operations drilled primarily in Oklahoma, California, Texas, Wyoming, Colorado, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Utah, Arkansas, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota and West Virginia. Offshore operations were conducted in the Gulf of Mexico, and offshore of California, Trinidad and Equatorial Guinea. Our International Land segment operated in six international locations during fiscal 2012: Ecuador, Colombia, Argentina, Tunisia, Bahrain and United Arab Emirates (‘‘UAE’’). We are also engaged in the ownership, development and operation of commercial real estate and the research and development of rotary steerable technology. Each of the businesses operates independently of the others through wholly-owned subsidiaries. This operating decentralization is balanced by centralized finance and legal organizations. Our real estate investments located exclusively within Tulsa, Oklahoma, include a shopping center containing approximately 441,000 leasable square feet, multi-tenant industrial warehouse properties containing approximately one million leasable square feet and approximately 210 acres of undeveloped real estate. Our subsidiary, TerraVici Drilling Solutions, Inc. (‘‘TerraVici’’), is developing patented rotary steerable technology to enhance horizontal and directional drilling operations. We acquired TerraVici to primarily complement our existing drilling rig technology as well as to potentially offer directional drilling services to third parties. By combining this new technology with our existing capabilities, we expect to improve drilling productivity and reduce total well cost to the customer. On June 30, 2010, the Venezuelan government seized 11 rigs owned by our Venezuelan subsidiary and associated real and personal property. We have sued the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and related governmental entities for damages sustained as a result of the seizure of our Venezuelan drilling business. We are also participating in one arbitration against a non-Venezuelan entity related to the seizure of our property in Venezuela (For further information, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings). We are currently unable to determine the timing or amounts we may receive, if any, or the likelihood of recovery. Our financial statements have been prepared with the net assets, results of operations, and cash flows of the Venezuelan operations presented as discontinued operations. The operations from our Venezuelan subsidiary were previously an operating segment within our International Land segment. CONTRACT DRILLING General We believe that we are one of the major land and offshore platform drilling contractors in the western hemisphere. Operating principally in North and South America, we specialize in shallow to deep drilling in oil and gas producing basins of the United States and in drilling for oil and gas in international locations. In the United States, we draw our customers primarily from the major oil companies and the larger independent oil companies. In South America, our current customers include major international oil companies. In fiscal 2012, we received approximately 59 percent of our consolidated operating revenues from our ten largest contract drilling customers. Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation, Marathon Oil Company and Devon Energy Production Co. LP (respectively, ‘‘Oxy’’, ‘‘Marathon’’ and ‘‘Devon’’), including their affiliates, are our three largest contract drilling customers. We perform drilling services for Oxy on a world-wide basis, and for Marathon and for Devon in U.S. land operations. Revenues from drilling services performed for Oxy, Marathon and Devon in fiscal 2012 accounted for approximately 12 percent, 10 percent and 10 percent, respectively, of our consolidated operating revenues for the same period. Rigs, Equipment and Facilities We provide drilling rigs, equipment, personnel and camps on a contract basis. These services are provided so that our customers may explore for and develop oil and gas from onshore areas and from fixed platforms, tension-leg platforms and spars in offshore areas. Each of the drilling rigs consists of engines, drawworks, a mast, pumps, blowout preventers, a drill string and related equipment. The intended well depth and the drilling site conditions are the principal factors that determine the size and type of rig most suitable for a particular drilling job. A land drilling rig may be moved from location to location without modification to the rig. A platform rig is specifically designed to perform drilling operations upon a particular platform. While a platform rig may be moved from its original platform, significant expense is incurred to modify a platform rig for operation on each subsequent platform. In addition to traditional platform rigs, we operate self-moving platform drilling rigs and drilling rigs to be used on tension-leg platforms and spars. The self-moving rig is designed to be moved without the use of expensive derrick barges. The tension-leg platforms and spars allow drilling operations to be conducted in much deeper water than traditional fixed platforms. Mechanical rigs rely on belts, pulleys and other mechanical devices to control drilling speed and other rig processes. As such, mechanical rigs are not highly efficient or precise in their operation. In contrast to mechanical rigs, SCR rigs rely on direct current for power. This enables motor speed to be controlled by changing electrical voltage. Compared to mechanical rigs, SCR rigs operate with greater efficiency, more power and better control. AC rigs on the other hand provide for even greater efficiency and flexibility than what can be achieved with mechanical or SCR rigs. AC rigs use a variable frequency drive that allows motor speed to be manipulated via changes to electrical frequency. The variable frequency drive permits greater control of motor speed for more precision. Among other attributes, AC rigs are electrically more efficient, produce more torque, utilize regenerative braking, have digital controls and AC motors require less maintenance. During the mid-1990’s, we undertook an initiative to use our land and offshore platform drilling experience to develop a new generation of drilling rigs that would be safer, faster-moving and more capable than mechanical rigs. In 1998, we put to work a new generation of highly mobile/depth flexible land drilling rigs (individually the ‘‘FlexRig(cid:4)’’). Since the introduction of our FlexRigs, we have focused on designing and building high-performance, high-efficiency rigs to be used exclusively in our contract drilling business. We believed that over time FlexRigs would displace older less capable rigs. With the advent of unconventional shale plays, our AC drive FlexRigs have proven to be particularly well suited for more complex horizontal drilling requirements. The FlexRig has been able to significantly reduce average rig move and drilling times compared to similar depth-rated traditional land rigs. In addition, the FlexRig allows greater depth flexibility and provides greater operating efficiency. The original rigs were designated as FlexRig1 and FlexRig2 rigs and were designed to drill wells with a depth of between 8,000 and 18,000 feet. In 2001, we announced that we would build the next generation of FlexRigs, known as ‘‘FlexRig3’’, which incorporated new drilling technology and new environmental and safety design. This new design included integrated top drive, AC electric drive, hydraulic BOP handling system, hydraulic tubular make-up and break-out system, split crown and traveling blocks and an 2 enlarged drill floor that enables simultaneous crew activities. FlexRig3s were designed to target well depths of between 8,000 and 22,000 feet. In 2006, we placed into service our first FlexRig4. While FlexRig4s are similar to our FlexRig3s, the FlexRig4s are designed to efficiently drill more shallow depth wells of between 4,000 and 18,000 feet. The FlexRig4 design includes a trailerized version and a skidding version, which incorporate additional environmental and safety design. This design permits the installation of a pipe handling system which allows the rig to be more efficiently operated and eliminates the need for a casing stabber in the mast. While the FlexRig4 trailerized version provides for more efficient well site to well site rig moves, the skidding version allows for drilling of up to 22 wells from a single pad which results in reduced environmental impact. In 2011, we announced the introduction of the FlexRig5 design. The FlexRig5 is suited for long lateral drilling of multiple wells from a single location, which is well suited for unconventional shale reservoirs. The new design preserves the key performance features of FlexRig3 combined with a bi-directional pad drilling system and equipment capacities suitable for wells in excess of 22,000 feet of measured depth. Industry trends toward more complex drilling have accelerated the retirement of less capable mechanical rigs. Over the past few years our mechanical rigs have been sold as we added new AC drive rigs to our fleet. The retirement of our remaining seven mechanical rigs in fiscal 2011 marked the end of a multi-year evolution in the high-grading of our fleet from mechanical rigs to high-efficiency, high-performance rigs. Since 1998, we have built and delivered 280 FlexRigs, including 165 FlexRig3s, 86 FlexRig4s, and 12 FlexRig5s. Of the total FlexRigs built through September 30, 2012, 162 have been built in the last five years. As of November 15, 2012, an additional 9 new FlexRigs remained under construction. The effective use of technology is important to the maintenance of our competitive position within the drilling industry. We expect to continue to refine our existing technology and develop new technology in the future. We assemble new FlexRigs at our gulf coast facility near Houston, Texas. We also have a 123,000 square foot fabrication facility located on approximately 11 acres near Tulsa, Oklahoma. During fiscal 2012, we leased a 150,000 square foot industrial facility near Tulsa, Oklahoma for the purpose of overhauling/repairing rig equipment and associated component parts. This facility is expected to be fully operational by December 2012. Drilling Contracts Our drilling contracts are obtained through competitive bidding or as a result of negotiations with customers, and often cover multi-well and multi-year projects. Each drilling rig operates under a separate drilling contract. During fiscal 2012, all drilling services were performed on a ‘‘daywork’’ contract basis, under which we charge a fixed rate per day, with the price determined by the location, depth and complexity of the well to be drilled, operating conditions, the duration of the contract, and the competitive forces of the market. We have previously performed contracts on a combination ‘‘footage’’ and ‘‘daywork’’ basis, under which we charged a fixed rate per foot of hole drilled to a stated depth, usually no deeper than 15,000 feet, and a fixed rate per day for the remainder of the hole. Contracts performed on a ‘‘footage’’ basis involve a greater element of risk to the contractor than do contracts performed on a ‘‘daywork’’ basis. Also, we have previously accepted ‘‘turnkey’’ contracts under which we charge a fixed sum to deliver a hole to a stated depth and agree to furnish services such as testing, coring and casing the hole which are not normally done on a ‘‘footage’’ basis. ‘‘Turnkey’’ contracts entail varying degrees of risk greater than the usual ‘‘footage’’ contract. We have not accepted any ‘‘footage’’ or ‘‘turnkey’’ contracts in over fifteen years. We believe that under current market conditions, ‘‘footage’’ and ‘‘turnkey’’ contract rates do not adequately compensate us for the 3 added risks. The duration of our drilling contracts are ‘‘well-to-well’’ or for a fixed term. ‘‘Well-to-well’’ contracts are cancelable at the option of either party upon the completion of drilling at any one site. Fixed-term contracts generally have a minimum term of at least six months but customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an ‘‘early termination payment’’ to be paid to us if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. However, under certain limited circumstances such as destruction of a drilling rig, our bankruptcy, sustained unacceptable performance by us or delivery of a rig beyond certain grace and/or liquidated damage periods, no early termination payment would be paid to us. Contracts generally contain renewal or extension provisions exercisable at the option of the customer at prices mutually agreeable to us and the customer. In most instances contracts provide for additional payments for mobilization and demobilization. As of September 30, 2012, we had 176 rigs under fixed-term contracts. While the original duration for these current fixed-term contracts are for six-month to seven-year periods, some fixed-term and well-to-well contracts are expected to be extended for longer periods than the original terms. However, the contracting parties have no legal obligation to extend these contracts. Backlog Our contract drilling backlog, being the expected future revenue from executed contracts with original terms in excess of one year, as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $3.6 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively. The decrease in backlog at September 30, 2012 from September 30, 2011, is primarily due to expiration of long-term contracts. Approximately 57.2 percent of the total September 30, 2012 backlog is not reasonably expected to be filled in fiscal 2013. A portion of the backlog represents term contracts for new rigs that will be constructed in the future. The following table sets forth the total backlog by reportable segment as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the percentage of the September 30, 2012 backlog not reasonably expected to be filled in fiscal 2013: Reportable Segment U.S. Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Offshore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Total Backlog Revenue 9/30/2012 9/30/2011 (in billions) $3.0 0.1 0.5 $3.6 $3.3 0.1 0.4 $3.8 Percentage Not Reasonably Expected to be Filled in Fiscal 2013 58.2% 35.4% 56.1% We obtain certain key rig components from a single or limited number of vendors or fabricators. Certain of these vendors or fabricators are thinly capitalized independent companies located on the Texas gulf coast. Therefore, disruptions in rig component deliveries may occur. Accordingly, the actual amount of revenue earned may vary from the backlog reported. For further information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors. 4 U.S. LAND DRILLING At the end of September 2012, 2011 and 2010, we had 282, 248 and 220, respectively, of our land rigs available for work in the United States. The total number of rigs at the end of fiscal 2012 increased by a net of 34 rigs from the end of fiscal 2011. The increase is due to 46 new FlexRigs being completed and placed into service, 3 rigs transferred to international operations, 3 rigs sold during fiscal 2012, and 4 mechanical highly mobile rigs and 2 conventional rigs being removed from service. Our U.S. Land operations contributed approximately 85 percent ($2.7 billion) of our consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2012, compared with approximately 83 percent ($2.1 billion) of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2011 and approximately 75 percent ($1.4 billion) of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2010. Rig utilization was approximately 89 percent in fiscal 2012, approximately 86 percent in fiscal 2011 and approximately 73 percent in fiscal 2010. Our fleet of FlexRigs had an average utilization of approximately 97 percent during fiscal 2012, while our conventional and highly mobile rigs had an average utilization of approximately 11 percent. A rig is considered to be utilized when it is operated or being mobilized or demobilized under contract. At the close of fiscal 2012, 231 out of an available 282 land rigs were working. OFFSHORE DRILLING Our Offshore operations contributed approximately 6 percent in fiscal year 2012 ($189.1 million) of our consolidated operating revenues compared to approximately 8 percent ($201.4 million) of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2011 and 11 percent ($202.7 million) of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2010. Rig utilization in fiscal 2012 was approximately 79 percent compared to approximately 77 percent in fiscal 2011 and approximately 80 percent in fiscal 2010. At the end of fiscal 2012, we had eight of our nine offshore platform rigs under contract and continued to work under management contracts for four customer-owned rigs. Revenues from drilling services performed for our largest offshore drilling customer totaled approximately 56 percent of offshore revenues during fiscal 2012. INTERNATIONAL LAND DRILLING General Our International Land operations contributed approximately 9 percent ($270.0 million) of our consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2012, compared with approximately 9 percent ($226.8 million) of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2011 and 13 percent ($247.2 million) in fiscal 2010. Rig utilization in fiscal 2012 was 77 percent, 70 percent in fiscal 2011 and 71 percent in fiscal 2010. Argentina At the end of fiscal 2012, we had nine rigs in Argentina. Our utilization rate was approximately 52 percent during fiscal 2012, approximately 49 percent during fiscal 2011 and approximately 53 percent during fiscal 2010. Revenues generated by Argentine drilling operations contributed approximately 2 percent in both fiscal years 2012 and 2011 ($54.3 million and $44.2 million, respectively) of our consolidated operating revenues compared with approximately 3 percent of consolidated operating revenues ($55.9 million) in fiscal 2010. Revenues from drilling services performed for our two largest customers in Argentina totaled approximately 2 percent of consolidated operating revenues and approximately 20 percent of international operating revenues during fiscal 2012. The Argentine drilling contracts are primarily with large international or national oil companies. 5 Colombia At the end of fiscal 2012, we had seven rigs in Colombia. Our utilization rate was approximately 79 percent during fiscal 2012, approximately 83 percent during fiscal 2011 and approximately 71 percent during fiscal 2010. Revenues generated by Colombian drilling operations contributed approximately 3 percent in the three fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 of our consolidated operating revenues ($82.2 million, $74.5 million and $57.5 million, respectively). Revenues from drilling services performed for our largest customer in Colombia totaled approximately 1 percent of consolidated operating revenues and approximately 16 percent of international operating revenues during fiscal 2012. The Colombian drilling contracts are primarily with large international or national oil companies. Ecuador At the end of fiscal 2012, we had five rigs in Ecuador. The utilization rate in Ecuador was 97 percent in fiscal 2012, compared to 85 percent in fiscal 2011 and 100 percent in fiscal 2010. Revenues generated by Ecuadorian drilling operations contributed approximately 2 percent in both fiscal years 2012 and 2011 ($56.4 million and $42.6 million, respectively) of consolidated operating revenues compared with approximately 3 percent in fiscal 2010 ($52.1 million) of our consolidated operating revenues. Revenues from drilling services performed for the largest customer in Ecuador totaled approximately 1 percent of consolidated operating revenues and approximately 14 percent of international operating revenues during fiscal 2012. The Ecuadorian drilling contracts are primarily with large international or national oil companies. Other Locations In addition to our operations discussed above, at the end of fiscal 2012 we had two rigs in Tunisia, four rigs in Bahrain and two rigs in UAE. FINANCIAL Information relating to revenues, total assets and operating income by reportable operating segments may be found on, and is incorporated by reference to, pages 87 through 91 of our Annual Report. EMPLOYEES We had 8,147 employees within the United States (19 of which were part-time employees) and 1,282 employees in international operations as of September 30, 2012. AVAILABLE INFORMATION Information relating to our internet address and information relating to our Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) filings may be found on, and is incorporated by reference to, page 93 of our Annual Report. Item 1A. RISK FACTORS In addition to the risk factors discussed elsewhere in this Report, we caution that the following ‘‘Risk Factors’’ could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 6 Our offshore and land operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us. Our drilling operations are subject to the many hazards inherent in the business, including inclement weather, blowouts, well fires, loss of well control, pollution, and reservoir damage. These hazards could cause significant environmental damage, personal injury and death, suspension of drilling operations, serious damage or destruction of equipment and property and substantial damage to producing formations and surrounding lands and waters. Our Offshore drilling operations are also subject to potentially greater environmental liability, including pollution of offshore waters and related negative impact on wildlife and habitat, adverse sea conditions and platform damage or destruction due to collision with aircraft or marine vessels. Our Offshore operations may also be negatively affected by blowouts or uncontrolled release of oil by third parties whose offshore operations are unrelated to our operations. We operate several platform rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. The Gulf of Mexico experiences hurricanes and other extreme weather conditions on a frequent basis, the frequency of which may increase with any climate change. Damage caused by high winds and turbulent seas could potentially curtail operations on such platform rigs for significant periods of time until the damage can be repaired. Moreover, even if our platform rigs are not directly damaged by such storms, we may experience disruptions in operations due to damage to customer platforms and other related facilities in the area. We have a new-build rig assembly facility located near the Houston, Texas, ship channel, and our principal fabricator and other vendors are also located in the gulf coast region. Due to their location, these facilities are exposed to potentially greater hurricane damage. We have indemnification agreements with many of our customers and we also maintain liability and other forms of insurance. In general, our drilling contracts contain provisions requiring our customer to indemnify us for, among other things, pollution and reservoir damage. However, our contractual rights to indemnification may be unenforceable or limited due to negligent or willful acts by us, our subcontractors and/or suppliers. Our customers may also dispute, or be unable to meet, their contractual indemnification obligations to us. Accordingly, we may be unable to transfer these risks to our drilling customers by contract or indemnification agreements. Incurring a liability for which we are not fully indemnified or insured could have a material adverse effect our business, financial condition and results of operations. With the exception of ‘‘named wind storm’’ risk in the Gulf of Mexico, we insure rigs and related equipment at values that approximate the current replacement cost on the inception date of the policy. However, we self-insure a large deductible as well as a significant portion of the estimated replacement cost of our offshore rigs and our land rigs and equipment. We also carry insurance with varying deductibles and coverage limits with respect to offshore platform rigs and ‘‘named wind storm’’ risk in the Gulf of Mexico. We have insurance coverage for comprehensive general liability, automobile liability, worker’s compensation and employer’s liability, and certain other specific risks. Insurance is purchased over deductibles to reduce our exposure to catastrophic events. We retain a significant portion of our expected losses under our worker’s compensation, general liability and automobile liability programs. The Company self-insures a number of other risks including loss of earnings and business interruption. We are unable to obtain significant amounts of insurance to cover risks of underground reservoir damage; however, we are generally indemnified under our drilling contracts from this risk. 7 If a significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or an enforceable or recoverable indemnity from a customer, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our insurance will not in all situations provide sufficient funds to protect us from all liabilities that could result from our drilling operations. Our coverage includes aggregate policy limits. As a result, we retain the risk for any loss in excess of these limits. No assurance can be given that all or a portion of our coverage will not be cancelled during fiscal 2013, that insurance coverage will continue to be available at rates considered reasonable or that our coverage will respond to a specific loss. Further, we may experience difficulties in collecting from our insurers or our insurers may deny all or a portion of our claims for insurance coverage. Oil and natural gas prices are volatile, and low prices could negatively affect our financial results in the future. Our operations can be materially affected by low oil and gas prices. We believe that any significant reduction in oil and gas prices could depress the level of exploration and production activity and result in a corresponding decline in demand for our services. Worldwide military, political and economic events, including initiatives by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, may affect both the demand for, and the supply of, oil and gas. Fluctuations during the last few years in the demand and supply of oil and gas have contributed to, and are likely to continue to contribute to, price volatility. Any prolonged reduction in demand for our services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. A sluggish global economy may affect our business. As a result of volatility in oil and natural gas prices and a continuing sluggish global economic environment, we are unable to determine whether our customers will maintain spending on exploration and development drilling or whether customers and/or vendors and suppliers will be able to access financing necessary to sustain their current level of operations, fulfill their commitments and/or fund future operations and obligations. The current global economic environment may impact industry fundamentals and result in reduced demand for drilling rigs. These conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The contract drilling business is highly competitive. Competition in contract drilling involves such factors as price, rig availability, efficiency, condition and type of equipment, reputation, operating safety, environmental impact, and customer relations. Competition is primarily on a regional basis and may vary significantly by region at any particular time. Land drilling rigs can be readily moved from one region to another in response to changes in levels of activity, and an oversupply of rigs in any region may result, leading to increased price competition. Although many contracts for drilling services are awarded based solely on price, we have been successful in establishing long-term relationships with certain customers which have allowed us to secure drilling work even though we may not have been the lowest bidder for such work. We have continued to attempt to differentiate our services based upon our FlexRigs and our engineering design expertise, operational efficiency, safety and environmental awareness. This strategy is less effective when lower demand for drilling services intensifies price competition and makes it more difficult or impossible to compete on any basis other than price. Also, future improvements in operational efficiency and safety by our competitors could negatively affect our ability to differentiate our services. 8 The loss of one or a number of our large customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In fiscal 2012, we received approximately 59 percent of our consolidated operating revenues from our ten largest contract drilling customers and approximately 32 percent of our consolidated operating revenues from our three largest customers (including their affiliates). We believe that our relationship with all of these customers is good; however, the loss of one or more of our larger customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. International uncertainties and local laws could adversely affect our business. International operations are subject to certain political, economic and other uncertainties not encountered in U.S. operations, including increased risks of social unrest, strikes, terrorism, kidnapping of employees, nationalization, forced negotiation or modification of contracts, expropriation of equipment as well as expropriation of a particular oil company operator’s property and drilling rights, taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions, currency rate fluctuations and general hazards associated with foreign sovereignty over certain areas in which operations are conducted. On June 30, 2010, the Venezuelan government seized 11 rigs and associated real and personal property owned by our Venezuelan subsidiary. In Argentina, general economic conditions have shown improvement and political protests and social disturbances have diminished considerably since the economic crisis of 2001 and 2002. However, the rapid and radical nature of the changes in the Argentine social, political, economic and legal environment over the past several years and the absence of a clear political consensus in favor of any particular set of economic policies have given rise to significant uncertainties about the country’s economic and political future. It is currently unclear whether the economic and political instability experienced over the past several years will continue and it is possible that, despite recent economic growth, Argentina may return to a deeper recession, higher inflation and unemployment and greater social unrest. If instability persists, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that there will not be changes in local laws, regulations and administrative requirements or the interpretation thereof which could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our operations or on our ability to continue operations in certain areas. Because of the impact of local laws, our future operations in certain areas may be conducted through entities in which local citizens own interests and through entities (including joint ventures) in which we hold only a minority interest or pursuant to arrangements under which we conduct operations under contract to local entities. While we believe that neither operating through such entities nor pursuant to such arrangements would have a material adverse effect on our operations or revenues, there can be no assurance that we will in all cases be able to structure or restructure our operations to conform to local law (or the administration thereof) on terms we find acceptable. Although we attempt to minimize the potential impact of such risks by operating in more than one geographical area, during fiscal 2012, approximately 9 percent of our consolidated operating revenues were generated from the international contract drilling business. During fiscal 2012, approximately 72 percent of the international operating revenues were from operations in South America. All of the South American operating revenues were from Argentina, Colombia and Ecuador. We depend on a limited number of vendors, some of which are thinly capitalized and the loss of any of which could disrupt our operations. Certain key rig components are either purchased from or fabricated by a single or limited number of vendors, and we have no long-term contracts with many of these vendors. Shortages could occur in these essential components due to an interruption of supply or increased demands in the industry. If we are unable to procure certain of such rig components, we would be required to reduce our rig 9 construction or other operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If our principal fabricator, located on the Texas gulf coast, was unable or unwilling to continue fabricating rig components, then we would have to transfer this work to other acceptable fabricators. This transfer could result in significant delay in the completion of new FlexRigs. Any significant interruption in the fabrication of rig components could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Certain key rig components are obtained from vendors that are, in some cases, thinly capitalized, independent companies that generate significant portions of their business from us or from a small group of companies in the energy industry. These vendors may be disproportionately affected by any loss of business, downturn in the energy industry or reduction or unavailability of credit. Therefore, disruptions in rig component delivery may occur, and such disruptions and terminations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our securities portfolio may lose significant value due to a decline in equity prices and other market-related risks, thus impacting our debt ratio and financial strength. At September 30, 2012, we had a portfolio of securities with a total fair value of approximately $452 million. The fair value in Atwood Oceanics, Inc. and Schlumberger, Ltd. was $434 million at September 30, 2012. These securities are subject to a wide variety of market-related risks that could substantially reduce or increase the fair value of our holdings. Except for investments in limited partnerships carried at cost, the portfolio is recorded at fair value on our balance sheet with changes in unrealized after-tax value reflected in the equity section of our balance sheet. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we sold our share in the limited partnerships. Any reduction in fair value would have an impact on our debt ratio and financial strength. At November 15, 2012, the fair value of the portfolio had increased to approximately $438 million. Government regulations and environmental laws could adversely affect our business. Many aspects of our operations are subject to government regulation, including those relating to drilling practices, pollution, disposal of hazardous substances and oil field waste. The United States and various other countries have environmental regulations which affect drilling operations. The cost of compliance with these laws could be substantial. A failure to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us to substantial civil and criminal penalties. In addition, environmental laws and regulations in the United States impose a variety of requirements on ‘‘responsible parties’’ related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages from such spills. As an owner and operator of drilling rigs, we may be deemed to be a responsible party under these laws and regulations. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all legislation and regulations affecting our operations in the drilling of oil and gas wells and in controlling the discharge of wastes. To date, compliance costs have not materially affected our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position, although compliance measures may add to the costs of drilling operations. Additional legislation or regulation may reasonably be anticipated, and the effect thereof on our operations cannot be predicted. Regulation of greenhouse gases and climate change could have a negative impact on our business. Scientific studies have suggested that emissions of certain gases, commonly referred to as ‘‘greenhouse gases’’ (‘‘GHGs’’) and including carbon dioxide and methane, may be contributing to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. In response to such studies, the issue of climate change and the effect of GHG emissions, in particular emissions from fossil fuels, is attracting increasing attention worldwide. We are aware of the increasing focus of local, state, national and 10 international regulatory bodies on GHG emissions and climate change issues. The United States Congress may consider legislation to reduce GHG emissions. Although it is not possible at this time to predict whether proposed legislation or regulations will be adopted, any such future laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions. Any additional costs or operating restrictions associated with legislation or regulations regarding GHG emissions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. New legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could delay or limit the drilling services we provide to customers whose drilling programs could be impacted by such laws. Members of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or the EPA, are reviewing more stringent regulation of hydraulic fracturing, a technology which involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into rock formations to stimulate oil and natural gas production. Both the U.S. Congress and the EPA are studying whether there is any link between hydraulic fracturing and soil or ground water contamination or any impact on public health. Legislation has been introduced before Congress to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the fracturing process. In addition, some states have and others are considering adopting regulations that could restrict hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances. We do not engage in any hydraulic fracturing activities. However, any new laws, regulation or permitting requirements regarding hydraulic fracturing could delay or limit the drilling services we provide to customers whose drilling programs could be impacted by new legal requirements. Widespread regulation significantly restricting or prohibiting hydraulic fracturing by our customers could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by foreign currency devaluation. Contracts for work in foreign countries generally provide for payment in U.S. dollars; however, government-owned petroleum companies may in the future require that a greater proportion of these payments be made in local currencies. Based upon current information, we believe that our exposure to potential losses from currency devaluation in foreign countries is immaterial. However, in the event of future payments in local currencies or an inability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars, we may incur currency devaluation losses which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment. Fixed-term drilling contracts customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an ‘‘early termination payment’’ to be paid to us if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. However, under certain limited circumstances, such as destruction of a drilling rig, our bankruptcy, sustained unacceptable performance by us or delivery of a rig beyond certain grace and/or liquidated damage periods, no early termination payment would be paid to us. Even if an early termination payment is owed to us, the current global economic environment may affect the customer’s ability to pay the early termination payment. Shortages of drilling equipment and supplies could adversely affect our operations. The contract drilling business is highly cyclical. During periods of increased demand for contract drilling services, delays in delivery and shortages of drilling equipment and supplies can occur. These risks are intensified during periods when the industry experiences significant new drilling rig construction or refurbishment. Any such delays or shortages could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 11 New technologies may cause our drilling methods and equipment to become less competitive, resulting in an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we take measures to ensure that we use advanced oil and natural gas drilling technology, changes in technology or improvements in competitors’ equipment could make our equipment less competitive or require significant capital investments to keep our equipment competitive. Any such changes in technology could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Competition for experienced personnel may negatively impact our operations or financial results. We utilize highly skilled personnel in operating and supporting our businesses. In times of high utilization, it can be difficult to retain, and in some cases find, qualified individuals. Although to date our operations have not been materially affected by competition for personnel, an inability to obtain or find a sufficient number of qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Improvements in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Since our business depends on the level of activity in the oil and natural gas industry, any improvement in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies that increase the use of alternative forms of energy and reduce the demand for oil and natural gas could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS We have received no written comments regarding our periodic or current reports from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission that were issued 180 days or more preceding the end of our 2012 fiscal year and that remain unresolved. 12 Item 2. PROPERTIES CONTRACT DRILLING The following table sets forth certain information concerning our U.S. land and offshore drilling rigs as of September 30, 2012: Location FLEXRIGS Rig Average Depth (Feet) Rig Type Drawworks: Horsepower TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WYOMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 165 166 167 168 169 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 13 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 SCR (FlexRig1) SCR (FlexRig1) SCR (FlexRig1) SCR (FlexRig1) SCR (FlexRig1) SCR (FlexRig1) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) SCR (FlexRig2) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Location TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WYOMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MONTANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UTAH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WYOMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OHIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OHIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig 238 239 240 241 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 Average Depth (Feet) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Rig Type AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) Drawworks: Horsepower 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 14 Location ARKANSAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UTAH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WYOMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WYOMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UTAH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UTAH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MONTANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig 289 290 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 Average Depth (Feet) 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 8,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Rig Type AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) Drawworks: Horsepower 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 15 Location TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COLORADO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ARKANSAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig 348 349 351 352 353 354 355 356 360 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 Average Depth (Feet) 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 18,000 18,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Rig Type AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) Drawworks: Horsepower 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 16 Location OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CALIFORNIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH DAKOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 Average Depth (Feet) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Rig Type AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) Drawworks: Horsepower 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 17 Location NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONVENTIONAL RIGS LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OKLAHOMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEXAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig 474 475 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 486 487 488 494 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 519 122 162 79 80 89 92 94 98 137 149 72 73 125 134 136 157 161 163 Average Depth (Feet) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 26,000 26,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Rig Type AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) AC (FlexRig5) SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Drawworks: Horsepower 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,700 1,500 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 18 Location OFFSHORE PLATFORM RIGS Rig Average Depth (Feet) Rig Type Drawworks: Horsepower LOUISIANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GULF OF MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 205 206 100 105 107 201 202 204 20,000 20,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Self-Erecting Self-Erecting Self-Erecting Conventional Conventional Conventional Tension-leg Tension-leg Tension-leg 2,500 2,000 1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 The following table sets forth information with respect to the utilization of our U.S. land and offshore drilling rigs for the periods indicated: Years ended September 30, 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 U.S. Land Rigs Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig utilization rate during period (1) . . . . U.S. Offshore Platform Rigs Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig utilization rate during period (1) . . . . 201 185 96% 68% 73% 86% 89% 220 282 248 9 9 9 75% 89% 80% 77% 79% 9 9 (1) A rig is considered to be utilized when it is operated or being moved, assembled or dismantled under contract. 19 The following table sets forth certain information concerning our international drilling rigs as of September 30, 2012: Location UAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bahrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bahrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bahrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bahrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tunisia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tunisia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig 476 484 335 336 337 338 123 175 177 151 230 291 292 301 339 333 334 237 190 133 139 152 132 176 121 117 138 228 242 Average Depth (Feet) 22,000 22,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 26,000 30,000 30,000 30,000+ 22,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 22,000 26,000 30,000 30,000+ 30,000+ 18,000 18,000 20,000 26,000 26,000 22,000 22,000 Rig Type AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) SCR SCR SCR SCR AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig4) AC (FlexRig3) SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR AC (FlexRig3) AC (FlexRig3) Drawworks: Horsepower 1,500 1,500 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 2,100 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,500 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,500 1,700 2,500 2,500 1,500 1,500 The following table sets forth information with respect to the utilization of our international drilling rigs for the periods indicated: Years ended September 30, 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig utilization rate during period (1)(2) . . . 33 19 28 72% 70% 71% 70% 77% 29 24 (1) A rig is considered to be utilized when it is operated or being moved, assembled or dismantled under contract. (2) Does not include rigs returned to the United States for major modifications and upgrades. 20 STOCK PORTFOLIO Information required by this item regarding our stock portfolio may be found on, and is incorporated by reference to, page 48 of our Annual Report under the caption, ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.’’ Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 1. Pending Investigation by the U.S. Attorney. In May 2010, one of our employees reported certain possible choke manifold testing irregularities at one offshore platform rig. Operations were promptly suspended on that rig after receiving the employee’s report. The Minerals Management Service (now known as the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement) was promptly notified of the employee’s report and it conducted an initial investigation of this matter. Upon conclusion of the initial investigation, we were permitted to resume normal operations on the rig. Also, we promptly commenced an internal investigation of the employee’s allegations. Our internal investigation found that certain employees on the rig failed to follow our policies and procedures, which resulted in termination of those employees. There were no spills or discharges to the environment. The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana has commenced a grand jury investigation, which is ongoing. We received, and have complied with, a subpoena for documents in connection with that investigation. Certain of our current and former employees have been interviewed by the government or have testified before the grand jury. In late April 2011, the Company was advised that it is a subject of this investigation. Mr. Donald Hudson, former offshore platform rig manager, pleaded guilty to one felony charge of making false statements to a federal investigator concerning his participation in the testing irregularities that were reported in May 2010. He has been sentenced to two years probation and 120 hours community service. Mr. Hudson’s employment was terminated by the Company in June 2010. We continue to cooperate with this government investigation. Although we presently believe that this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company, we can provide no assurances as to the timing or eventual outcome of this investigation. 2. Venezuela Expropriation. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Helmerich & Payne de Venezuela, C.A. filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on September 23, 2011 against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (‘‘Petroleo’’) and PDVSA Petroleo, S.A. (‘‘PDVSA’’). We are seeking damages for the taking of our Venezuelan drilling business in violation of international law and for breach of contract. Additionally, we are participating in one arbitration against a third party not affiliated with the Venezuelan government, Petroleo or PDVSA in an attempt to collect an aggregate $50 million relating to the seizure of our property in Venezuela. The arbitration hearing is presently scheduled for late May 2013. While there exists the possibility of realizing a recovery, we are currently unable to determine the timing or amounts we may receive, if any, or the likelihood of recovery. In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2012, we settled an arbitration dispute with a third party not affiliated with the Venezuelan government, Petroleo or PDVSA related to the seizure of our property in Venezuela. Proceeds of $7.5 million were received and recorded as discontinued operations. Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 21 OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The following table sets forth the names and ages of our executive officers, together with all positions and offices held with the Company by such executive officers. Officers are elected to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and have qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Hans Helmerich, 54 . . . . . Chairman of the Board since January 2012; Chief Executive Officer since September 2012; President and Chief Executive Officer from 1989 to September 2012; Director since 1987 John W. Lindsay, 51 . . . . . President and Chief Operating Officer since September 2012; Director since September 2012; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2010 to September 2012; Executive Vice President, U.S. and International Operations of Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. from 2006 to 2012; Vice President of U.S. Land Operations of Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. from 1997 to 2006 Steven R. Mackey, 61 . . . . Executive Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer since March 2010; Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel from June 2008 to March 2010; Secretary since 1990; Vice President from 1988 to 2010; General Counsel since 1988 Juan Pablo Tardio, 47 . . . . Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2010; Director of Investor Relations from January 2008 to April 2010; Manager of Investor Relations from August 2005 to January 2008 22 PART II Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES The principal market on which our common stock is traded is the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘‘HP’’. The high and low sale prices per share for the common stock for each quarterly period during the past two fiscal years as reported in the NYSE-Composite Transaction quotations follow: Quarter 2011 2012 High Low High Low First . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $49.46 69.72 70.47 73.40 $39.65 47.53 57.08 40.60 $60.88 68.60 55.74 51.71 $35.58 51.69 38.71 41.82 We paid quarterly cash dividends during the past two fiscal years as shown in the following table: Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paid per Share Total Payment Fiscal Fiscal 2011 $.06 .06 .06 .07 2012 $.07 .07 .07 .07 2011 2012 $6,376,282 6,408,617 6,438,106 7,518,604 $7,522,280 7,548,299 7,549,986 7,428,943 Payment of future dividends will depend on earnings and other factors. As of November 15, 2012, there were 620 record holders of our common stock as listed by our transfer agent’s records. Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table summarizes selected financial information and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained on pages 39 through 53 of our Annual Report. Amounts for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 have been restated to reflect the Venezuelan operations as discontinued operations. Refer to Part I, Item 1 above for additional information regarding discontinued operations. 23 Five-year Summary of Selected Financial Data 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . Total assets* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends declared per common $1,869,371 420,258 (in thousands except per share amounts) $1,875,162 286,081 $1,843,740 380,546 $2,543,894 434,668 $3,151,802 573,609 41,480 461,738 (27,001) 353,545 (129,769) 156,312 (482) 434,186 7,436 581,045 4.02 0.40 4.42 3.93 3.61 2.70 (0.26) 3.35 (1.23) 1.47 3.56 2.66 4.06 — 4.06 3.99 5.35 0.07 5.42 5.27 0.39 4.32 3,588,045 475,000 (0.25) 3.31 4,161,024 420,000 (1.21) 1.45 4,265,370 360,000 — 3.99 5,003,891 235,000 0.07 5.34 5,721,085 195,000 share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.1850 0.2000 0.2200 0.2600 0.2800 * Total assets for all years include amounts related to discontinued operations. Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Information required by this item may be found on, and is incorporated by reference to, pages 39 through 53 of our Annual Report under the caption ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.’’ Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Information required by this item may be found under the caption ‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 6 of this Annual Report and on, and is incorporated by reference to, the following pages of our Annual Report under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements: Market Risk (cid:129) Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (cid:129) Commodity Price Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (cid:129) Interest Rate Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (cid:129) Equity Price Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 52 52-53 53 53 Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Information required by this item may be found on, and is incorporated by reference to, pages 55 through 92 of our Annual Report. 24 Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2012. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that: (cid:129) our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (cid:129) our disclosure controls and procedures operate such that important information flows to appropriate collection and disclosure points in a timely manner and are effective to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, and made known to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, particularly during the period when this Form 10-K was prepared, as appropriate to allow timely decision regarding the required disclosure. b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and the Board of Directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial 25 reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting, based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2012. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. This report appears below at the end of this Item 9A of Form 10-K. c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our fourth fiscal quarter of 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. * * * 26 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders Helmerich & Payne, Inc. We have audited Helmerich & Payne, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Helmerich & Payne, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012 and our report dated November 21, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Tulsa, Oklahoma November 21, 2012 27 Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 28 PART III Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions ‘‘Proposal 1—Election of Directors,’’ ‘‘Corporate Governance’’ and ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 6, 2013, to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after September 30, 2012. Information required under this item with respect to executive officers under Item 401 of Regulation S-K appears under ‘‘Our Executive Officers’’ in Part I of this Form 10-K. We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. The text of this code is located on our website under ‘‘Corporate Governance.’’ Our Internet address is www.hpinc.com. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers from this code on our website. Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this item regarding executive compensation, as well as director compensation and compensation committee interlocks and insider participation is incorporated herein by reference to the material beginning with the caption ‘‘Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis’’ and ending with the caption ‘‘Potential Payments Upon Termination’’, as well as under the captions ‘‘Director Compensation in Fiscal 2012’’ and ‘‘Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 6, 2013, to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after September 30, 2012. Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions ‘‘Summary of All Existing Equity Compensation Plans,’’ ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners’’ and ‘‘Security Ownership of Management’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 6, 2013, to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after September 30, 2012. Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions ‘‘Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons’’ and ‘‘Corporate Governance’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 6, 2013, to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after September 30, 2012. Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption ‘‘Audit Fees’’ in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 6, 2013, to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after September 30, 2012. 29 Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES a) 1. Financial Statements: The following appear in our Annual Report to Stockholders on the pages indicated below: PART IV Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 54 55 Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-57 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 59 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60-92 2. Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted as inapplicable or because the required information is contained in the financial statements or included in the notes thereto. 3. Exhibits. The following documents are included as exhibits to this Annual Report. Exhibits incorporated by reference, or which are otherwise not included herein are available free of charge upon written request. 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 *10.1 *10.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Amended and Restated By-laws of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Rights Agreement dated as of January 8, 1996, between the Company and The Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 18, 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221. Amendment to Rights Agreement dated December 8, 2005, between the Company and UMB Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2005, SEC File No. 001-04221. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Appendix ‘‘A’’ of the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on January 26, 2001. 2012-1 Amendment to Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. 30 *10.3 *10.4 *10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 Form of Agreements for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan being (i) Restricted Stock Award Agreement, (ii) Incentive Stock Option Agreement and (iii) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 333-63124 on Form S-8 dated June 15, 2001. Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221. Form of Change of Control Agreement for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221. Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 15, 2002, among Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and various insurance companies is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221. Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 15, 2009, among Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and various Note purchasers is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July 21, 2009, SEC File No. 001-04221. Credit Agreement dated May 25, 2012, among Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Office Lease dated May 30, 2003, between K/B Fund IV and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2003, SEC File No. 001-04221. 10.10 10.11 First Amendment to Lease between ASP, Inc. and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2008, SEC File No. 001-04221. Second Amendment to Office Lease dated December 13, 2011, between ASP, Inc. and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed by the Company on December 14, 2011, SEC File No. 001-04221. 10.12 Third Amendment to Office Lease dated September 5, 2012, between ASP, Inc. and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 31 *10.13 *10.14 *10.15 *10.16 *10.17 *10.18 *10.19 *10.20 *10.21 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Annual Bonus Plan for Executive Officers is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Appendix ‘‘A’’ to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed January 26, 2006. 2012-1 Amendment to Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Form of Agreements for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to certain executives: (i) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, (ii) Incentive Stock Option Agreement, and (iii) Restricted Stock Award Agreement are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2009, SEC File No. 001-04221. Form of Agreements for the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to participants other than certain executives: Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, Incentive Stock Option Agreement, and Restricted Stock Award Agreement are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2009, SEC File No. 001-04221. Form of Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreements and Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreements for the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to certain executive officers are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2009, SEC File No. 001-04221. Form of Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreements and Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreements for the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to participants other than certain executive officers are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2009, SEC File No. 001-04221. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Appendix ‘‘A’’ of the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on January 26, 2011. Form of Agreements for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to certain executives: (i) Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement and (ii) Restricted Stock Award Agreement are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. 32 *10.22 *10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 Form of Agreements for the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to participants other than certain executives: (i) Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement and (ii) Restricted Stock Award Agreement are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Form of Agreements for the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to Directors: (i) Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement and (ii) Restricted Stock Award Agreement are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2012, SEC File No. 001-04221. Fabrication Contract between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industries, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2006, SEC File No. 001-04221. Contract dated July 18, 2007, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industrial Services, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2007, SEC File No. 001-04221. Amendment to Contract dated August 8, 2008, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industries, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2008, SEC File No. 001-04221. Amendment to Contract dated August 8, 2008, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industrial Services, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2008, SEC File No. 001-04221. Second Amendment to Contract dated March 26, 2010, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industries, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2011, SEC File No. 001-04221. Second Amendment to Contract dated March 26, 2010, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industrial Services, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2011, SEC File No. 001-04221. Third Amendment to Contract dated August 4, 2011, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industries, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2011, SEC File No. 001-04221. 33 10.31 *10.32 *10.33 *10.34 13. 21. 23.1 31.1 31.2 32. 101. Third Amendment to Contract dated August 4, 2011, between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Southeast Texas Industrial Services, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2011, SEC File No. 001-04221. Supplemental Retirement Income Plan for Salaried Employees of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-04221. Supplemental Savings Plan for Salaried Employees of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-04221. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, SEC File No. 001-04221. The Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for fiscal 2012. List of Subsidiaries of the Company. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Financial statements from the annual report on Form 10-K of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, filed on November 21, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. * Management or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement. 34 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized: SIGNATURES HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. By /s/ HANS HELMERICH Hans Helmerich, Chief Executive Officer Date: November 21, 2012 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated: By /s/ WILLIAM L. ARMSTRONG By /s/ RANDY A. FOUTCH William L. Armstrong, Director Date: November 21, 2012 Randy A. Foutch, Director Date: November 21, 2012 By /s/ HANS HELMERICH By /s/ JOHN W. LINDSAY Hans Helmerich, Director & CEO Date: November 21, 2012 John W. Lindsay, Director & President Date: November 21, 2012 By /s/ PAULA MARSHALL By /s/ THOMAS A. PETRIE Paula Marshall, Director Date: November 21, 2012 Thomas A. Petrie, Director Date: November 21, 2012 By /s/ DONALD F. ROBILLARD, JR. By /s/ FRANCIS ROONEY Donald F. Robillard, Jr., Director Date: November 21, 2012 Francis Rooney, Director Date: November 21, 2012 By /s/ EDWARD B. RUST, JR. By /s/ JOHN D. ZEGLIS Edward B. Rust, Jr., Director Date: November 21, 2012 John D. Zeglis, Director Date: November 21, 2012 By /s/ JUAN PABLO TARDIO By /s/ GORDON K. HELM Juan Pablo Tardio (Principal Financial Officer) Date: November 21, 2012 Gordon K. Helm (Principal Accounting Officer) Date: November 21, 2012 35 I, Hans Helmerich, certify that: CERTIFICATION 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 21, 2012 /s/ HANS HELMERICH Hans Helmerich Chief Executive Officer 36 I, Juan Pablo Tardio, certify that: CERTIFICATION 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 21, 2012 /s/ JUAN PABLO TARDIO Juan Pablo Tardio Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 37 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), Hans Helmerich, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Juan Pablo Tardio, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ HANS HELMERICH Hans Helmerich Chief Executive Officer Date: November 21, 2012 /s/ JUAN PABLO TARDIO Juan Pablo Tardio Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: November 21, 2012 38 Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Part I of our Form 10-K as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto. Our future operating results may be affected by various trends and factors which are beyond our control. These include, among other factors, fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices, unexpected expiration or termination of drilling contracts, currency exchange gains and losses, expropriation of real and personal property, changes in general economic conditions, disruptions to the global credit markets, rapid or unexpected changes in technologies, risks of foreign operations, uninsured risks, changes in domestic and foreign policies, laws and regulations and uncertain business conditions that affect our businesses. Accordingly, past results and trends should not be used by investors to anticipate future results or trends. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions. We caution that, while we believe such assumptions to be reasonable and make them in good faith, assumed facts almost always vary from actual results. The differences between assumed facts and actual results can be material. We are including this cautionary statement to take advantage of the ‘‘safe harbor’’ provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by us or persons acting on our behalf. The factors identified in this cautionary statement and those factors discussed under Risk Factors beginning on page 6 of our Form 10-K are important factors (but not necessarily inclusive of all important factors) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us or persons acting on our behalf. Except as required by law, we undertake no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on changes of internal estimates or expectations or otherwise. Executive Summary Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is primarily a contract drilling company with a total fleet of 320 drilling rigs at September 30, 2012. Our contract drilling segments consist of the U.S. Land segment with 282 rigs, the Offshore segment with 9 offshore platform rigs and the International Land segment with 29 rigs at September 30, 2012. We continued to expand our rig fleet and activity in 2012 even as pronounced volatility in oil and natural gas prices impacted drilling market conditions and prospects. Our position in the market is strengthened by our high quality fleet, our long-term contracts and our customer base. During 2012, we placed into service 48 new FlexRigs, all with fixed multi-year contracts. Two of these new FlexRigs were sent to an international location. At September 30, 2012, we had 264 active rigs, as compared to 250 active rigs at the same time during the prior year. As we begin 2013, we expect our customers to continue to become more focused in their efforts to enhance drilling efficiencies to reduce total well costs. We believe that our superior field performance and safety record will allow us to continue to gain market share over the coming years. As further discussed in Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, our Venezuelan subsidiary was classified as discontinued operations on June 30, 2010, after the seizure of our drilling assets in that country by the Venezuelan government. Except as specifically discussed, the following results of operations pertains only to our continuing operations. Unless otherwise indicated, references to 2012, 2011 and 2010 in the following discussion are referring to our fiscal year 2012, 2011 and 2010. 39 Results of Operations All per share amounts included in the Results of Operations discussion are stated on a diluted basis. Our net income for 2012 was $581.0 million ($5.34 per share), compared with $434.2 million ($3.99 per share) for 2011 and $156.3 million ($1.45 per share) for 2010. Included in our net income for 2011 was an after-tax gain from the sale of an investment in a limited partnership of $0.6 million ($0.01 per share). Net income also includes after-tax gains from the sale of assets of $12.3 million ($0.11 per share) in 2012, $8.8 million ($0.08 per share) in 2011 and $3.3 million ($0.03 per share) in 2010. Consolidated operating revenues were $3.2 billion in 2012, $2.5 billion in 2011 and $1.9 billion in 2010. As 2012 progressed, commodity price volatility and our customers’ desire to stay within their 2012 budgets caused our active rig count to decline late in the fiscal year after experiencing increases since early 2010 through the first three quarters of fiscal 2012. As a result, our U.S. land rig utilization was 89 percent in 2012, 86 percent in 2011 and 73 percent in 2010. The average number of U.S. land rigs available was 266 rigs in 2012, 237 rigs in 2011 and 207 rigs in 2010. Revenue in the Offshore segment declined in 2012, after remaining steady in 2011 and 2010. Rig utilization for offshore rigs was 79 percent in 2012, compared to 77 percent in 2011 and 80 percent in 2010. Revenue in the International Land segment increased in 2012 after declining in 2011 from 2010. Rig utilization in our International Land segment was 77 percent in 2012, 70 percent in 2011 and 71 percent in 2010. In 2011, we had a $0.9 million gain from the sale of investment securities. We did not sell any investment securities in 2012 or 2010. Interest and dividend income was $1.4 million, $2.0 million and $1.8 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Direct operating costs in 2012 were $1.8 billion or 56 percent of operating revenues, compared with $1.4 billion or 56 percent of operating revenues in 2011 and $1.1 billion or 57 percent of operating revenues in 2010. Depreciation expense was $387.5 million in 2012, $315.5 million in 2011 and $262.7 million in 2010. Included in depreciation are abandonments of equipment of $16.4 million in 2012, $4.9 million in 2011 and $4.2 million in 2010. Depreciation expense, exclusive of the abandonments, increased over the three-year period as we placed into service 48 new rigs in 2012, 36 in 2011 and 23 in 2010. Depreciation expense in 2013 is expected to increase from 2012 from new rigs placed into service during 2012 and additional rigs placed into service during 2013. (See Liquidity and Capital Resources.) As conditions warrant, management performs an analysis of the industry market conditions impacting its long-lived assets in each drilling segment. Based on this analysis, management determines if any impairment is required. In 2012, 2011 and 2010, no impairment was recorded. General and administrative expenses totaled $107.3 million in 2012, $91.5 million in 2011 and $81.5 million in 2010. The $15.8 million increase in 2012 from 2011 is due to increases in salaries, bonuses, and stock-based compensation of approximately $12.5 million associated with growth in the number of employees and increases in wages in comparative periods. The remaining increase is primarily due to higher professional services and to other corporate overhead associated with supporting continued growth of our drilling business. Interest expense was $8.7 million in 2012, $17.4 million in 2011 and $17.2 million in 2010. Interest expense is primarily attributable to the fixed-rate debt outstanding. Interest expense decreased in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to a reduction in outstanding debt balances, a reduction in interest related to uncertain tax positions, interest accrued for settlement of a lawsuit in 2011 not incurred in 2012 and an increase in capitalized interest. Capitalized interest was $12.9 million, $8.2 million and $6.4 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. All of the capitalized interest is attributable to our rig construction program. 40 The provision for income taxes totaled $329.0 million in 2012, $252.4 million in 2011 and $152.2 million in 2010. The effective income tax rate was 36 percent in 2012 compared to 37 percent in 2011 and 35 percent in 2010. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. Recoverability of any tax assets are evaluated and necessary allowances are provided. The carrying value of the net deferred tax assets is based on management’s judgments using certain estimates and assumptions that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the benefits of such assets. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future, additional valuation allowances may be recorded against the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in the future. (See Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional income tax disclosures.) During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $16.1 million, $15.8 million and $12.3 million, respectively, of research and development expenses primarily related to the ongoing development of the rotary steerable system tools. We anticipate research and development expenses to continue during 2013. In 2012, we had income from discontinued operations of $7.4 million compared to a loss from discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 of $0.5 million and $129.8 million, respectively. In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2012, we settled an arbitration dispute with a third party not affiliated with the Venezuelan government, Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (‘‘Petroleo’’) or PDVSA Petroleo, S.A. (‘‘PDVSA’’) related to the seizure of our property in Venezuela. Proceeds of $7.5 million were received and recorded as discontinued operations. The loss from discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 was the result of our Venezuelan drilling business, including eleven rigs and associated real and personal property, being seized by the Venezuelan government on June 30, 2010. In 2010, we derecognized our Venezuela property and equipment and warehouse inventory and wrote off other accounts where future cash inflows and outflows associated with them were no longer expected to occur. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Helmerich & Payne de Venezuela, C.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on September 23, 2011 against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Petroleo and PDVSA. Our subsidiaries seek damages for the taking of their Venezuelan drilling business in violation of international law and for breach of contract. Additionally, we are participating in another arbitration against a third party not affiliated with the Venezuelan government, Petroleo or PDVSA in an attempt to collect an aggregate $50 million relating to the seizure of our property in Venezuela. The arbitration hearing is presently scheduled for late May 2013. While there exists the possibility of realizing a recovery, we are currently unable to determine the timing or amounts we may receive, if any, or the likelihood of recovery. No gain contingencies are recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. 41 The following tables summarize operations by reportable operating segment. Comparison of the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 U.S. LAND OPERATIONS Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Direct operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 2011 % Change (in thousands, except operating statistics) $2,678,475 1,407,986 30,798 332,723 $2,100,508 1,119,700 25,066 264,127 27.5% 25.7 22.9 26.0 Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 906,968 $ 691,615 31.1 Operating Statistics: Revenue days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig revenue per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig expense per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig margin per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ 86,340 27,737 13,022 14,715 282 89% $ $ $ 73,905 25,809 12,538 13,271 248 16.8% 7.5 3.9 10.9 13.7 86% 3.5 Operating statistics for per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of ‘‘out-of-pocket’’ expenses of $283,640 and $193,093 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. Operating income in the U.S. Land segment increased to $907.0 million in 2012 from $691.6 million in 2011. Included in U.S. land revenues for 2012 and 2011 is approximately $10.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively, from early termination revenue. Excluding early termination related revenue, the average revenue per day for 2012 increased by $1,885 to $27,620 from $25,735 in 2011, primarily attributable to increases in dayrates in 2012 compared to 2011. Direct operating expenses increased 25.7 percent in 2012 from 2011; however, the expense as a percentage of revenue was 53 percent in both 2012 and 2011. Rig utilization increased to 89 percent in 2012 from 86 percent in 2011. The total number of rigs at September 30, 2012 was 282 compared to 248 rigs at September 30, 2011. The net increase is due to 46 new FlexRigs having been completed and placed into service, 3 FlexRigs transferred to the International Land segment, 3 idle conventional rigs sold, and four older mechanical highly mobile rigs and two older conventional rigs removed from service. Depreciation includes charges for abandoned equipment of $15.9 million and $3.8 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Excluding the abandonment amounts, depreciation in 2012 increased 22 percent from 2011 due to the increase in available rigs. We expect to complete and deliver approximately four rigs per month through early calendar 2013. Like those completed in fiscal 2012, each of these new rigs is committed to work for an exploration and production company under a fixed multi-year term contract, performing drilling services on a daywork contract basis. As a result of the new FlexRigs added in fiscal 2012 and additional rigs scheduled for completion in fiscal 2013, we anticipate depreciation expense to continue to increase in fiscal 2013. At September 30, 2012, 231 out of 282 existing rigs in the U.S. Land segment were generating revenue. Of the 231 rigs generating revenue, 158 were under fixed-term contracts, and 73 were working in the spot market. At November 15, 2012, the number of existing rigs under fixed-term contracts in the segment was 159 and the number of rigs working in the spot market increased to 78. 42 Comparison of the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 2012 2011 % Change (in thousands, except operating statistics) OFFSHORE OPERATIONS Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Direct operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $189,086 126,470 7,386 13,455 $201,417 135,368 6,074 14,684 Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 41,775 $ 45,291 Operating Statistics: Revenue days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig revenue per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig expense per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig margin per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,625 $ 53,927 $ 33,051 $ 20,876 9 79% 2,544 $ 51,794 $ 29,379 $ 22,415 9 77% (6.1)% (6.6) 21.6 (8.4) (7.8) 3.2% 4.1 12.5 (6.9) — 2.6 Operating statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of ‘‘out-of-pocket’’ expenses of $18,346 and $33,718 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. Also excluded are the effects of offshore platform management contracts and currency revaluation expense. Segment operating income and average rig margin per day in our Offshore segment declined in 2012 from 2011 partly because our rig previously working offshore Trinidad completed its contract in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, returned to the U.S. during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and was idle the remainder of the fiscal year. Additionally, a second rig was on standby for five months during 2012 compared to working all of 2011. Comparison of the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 2012 2011 % Change (in thousands, except operating statistics) INTERNATIONAL LAND OPERATIONS Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Direct operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $270,027 215,642 3,318 30,701 $226,849 175,728 3,392 28,018 Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20,366 $ 19,711 Operating Statistics: Revenue days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig revenue per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig expense per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig margin per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,343 $ 32,998 $ 25,524 7,474 $ 29 77% 6,406 $ 31,633 $ 23,416 8,217 $ 24 70% 19.0% 22.7 (2.2) 9.6 3.3 14.6% 4.3 9.0 (9.0) 20.8 10.0 Operating statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of ‘‘out-of-pocket’’ expenses of $27,720 and $24,207 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. Also excluded are the effects of currency revaluation expense. 43 The International Land segment had operating income of $20.4 million for 2012 compared to $19.7 million for 2011. Revenues in 2012 increased by $43.2 million from 2011 in our international land operations with rig utilization increasing to 77 percent in 2012 from 70 percent in 2011. The total number of rigs at September 30, 2012 was 29 compared to 24 rigs at September 30, 2011. The increase was due to two new FlexRigs having been completed and placed into service and three FlexRigs transferred from the U.S. Land segment. Segment operating income and average margin per day decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to early termination revenue earned in 2011 and higher operating expenses in 2012. Comparison of the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 2011 2010 % Change (in thousands, except operating statistics) U.S. LAND OPERATIONS Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Direct operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,100,508 1,119,700 25,066 264,127 $1,412,495 772,766 23,799 211,652 Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 691,615 $ 404,278 48.7% 44.9 5.3 24.8 71.1 Operating Statistics: Revenue days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig revenue per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig expense per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig margin per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ 73,905 25,809 12,538 13,271 248 86% $ $ $ 55,051 23,909 12,288 11,621 220 34.2% 7.9 2.0 14.2 12.7 73% 17.8 Operating statistics for per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of ‘‘out-of-pocket’’ expenses of $193,093 and $96,304 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Rig utilization excludes one FlexRig completed and ready for delivery at September 30, 2010. Operating income in the U.S. Land segment increased to $691.6 million in 2011 from $404.3 million in 2010. Included in U.S. land revenues for 2011 and 2010 was approximately $5.4 million and $41.2 million, respectively, from early termination revenue and revenue from customers that requested delivery delays for new FlexRigs. Excluding early termination related revenue and customer requested delivery delay revenue for new FlexRigs, the average revenue per day for 2011 increased by $2,574 to $25,735 from $23,161 in 2010, primarily attributable to increases in dayrates in 2011 compared to 2010. Direct operating expenses increased 44.9 percent in 2011 from 2010; however, the expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 53 percent in 2011 from 55 percent in 2010. The average rig expense per day increased by only $250 during 2011. Rig utilization increased to 86 percent in 2011 from 73 percent in 2010. The total number of rigs at September 30, 2011 was 248 compared to 220 rigs at September 30, 2010. The net increase was due to 35 new FlexRigs completed and placed into service, five transferred from the International Land segment, one transferred to the International Land segment, four sold and seven old mechanical highly mobile rigs removed from service. 44 Depreciation includes charges for abandoned equipment of $3.8 million and $3.5 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Excluding the abandonment amounts, depreciation in 2011 increased 25 percent from 2010 due to the increase in available rigs. Comparison of the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 OFFSHORE OPERATIONS Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Direct operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 2010 % Change (in thousands, except operating statistics) $201,417 135,368 6,074 14,684 $202,734 131,325 5,821 12,519 (0.6)% 3.1 4.3 17.3 Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45,291 $ 53,069 (14.7) Operating Statistics: Revenue days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig revenue per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig expense per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig margin per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,544 $ 51,794 $ 29,379 $ 22,415 9 77% 2,642 $ 47,534 $ 24,653 $ 22,881 9 80% (3.7)% 9.0 19.2 (2.0) — (3.8) Operating statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of ‘‘out-of-pocket’’ expenses of $33,718 and $37,594 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Also excluded are the effects of offshore platform management contracts and currency revaluation expense. Segment operating income in our Offshore segment declined by 14.7 percent in 2011 from 2010 primarily due to a decrease in revenue days. The decrease in revenue days was primarily due to the temporary stacking of a rig in early fiscal 2011 compared to the same rig working all of 2010. 45 Comparison of the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 INTERNATIONAL LAND OPERATIONS Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Direct operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 2010 % Change (in thousands, except operating statistics) $226,849 175,728 3,392 28,018 $247,179 166,021 2,949 29,938 (8.2)% 5.8 15.0 (6.4) Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,711 $ 48,271 (59.2) Operating Statistics: Revenue days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig revenue per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig expense per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average rig margin per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of rigs at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rig utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,406 $ 31,633 $ 23,416 8,217 $ 24 70% 7,254 $ 32,451 $ 21,142 $ 11,309 28 71% (11.7)% (2.5) 10.8 (27.3) (14.3) (1.4) Operating statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of ‘‘out-of-pocket’’ expenses of $24,207 and $11,779 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Also excluded are the effects of currency revaluation expense. The International Land segment had operating income of $19.7 million for 2011 compared to $48.3 million for 2010. Rig utilization for International land operations decreased to 70 percent in 2011 from 71 percent in 2010. The total number of rigs at September 30, 2011 was 24 compared to 28 rigs at September 30, 2010. The decrease was due to five rigs transferred to the U.S. Land segment and one rig transferred from the U.S. Land segment. Segment operating income and average margin per day decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to labor union interruptions in one country and idle rigs incurring fixed expenses. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Our capital spending was $1.1 billion in 2012, $694.3 million in 2011 and $329.6 million in 2010. Net cash provided from operating activities was $1.0 billion in 2012, $977.6 million in 2011 and $462.3 million in 2010. Our 2013 capital spending is currently estimated at $740 million. In addition to capital maintenance requirements, tubulars and other special projects, this annual estimate includes the completion of new FlexRigs that are already under long-term contracts and capital components and spares to either service existing rigs or be used to build additional rigs. Historically, we have financed operations primarily through internally generated cash flows. In periods when internally generated cash flows are not sufficient to meet liquidity needs, we will either borrow from available credit sources or we may sell portfolio securities. Likewise, if we are generating excess cash flows, we may invest in short-term money market securities. We manage a portfolio of marketable securities that, at the close of fiscal 2012, had a fair value of $451.6 million. Our investments in Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (‘‘Atwood’’) and Schlumberger, Ltd. made up 96 percent of the portfolio’s fair value on September 30, 2012. The value of the portfolio is subject to fluctuation in the market and may vary considerably over time. Excluding our investments in limited partnerships carried at cost, the portfolio is recorded at fair value on our balance sheet. 46 We generated cash proceeds from the sale of an investment in a limited partnership of $3.9 million in 2011. We did not sell any portfolio securities in 2012 or 2010. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we sold our share in three limited partnerships that were primarily invested in international equities. Proceeds of approximately $18.1 million were received during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Our proceeds from asset sales totaled $39.9 million in 2012, $26.8 million in 2011 and $7.9 million in 2010. Income from asset sales in 2012 totaled $19.2 million which includes the sale of three conventional rigs. In each year we also had sales of old or damaged rig equipment and drill pipe used in the ordinary course of business. We have $75 million of intermediate-term unsecured debt obligations that mature in August 2014. The interest rate through maturity will be 6.56 percent. The terms of the debt obligations require that we maintain a ratio of debt to total capitalization of less than 55 percent. We have $160 million senior unsecured fixed-rate notes outstanding at September 30, 2012 that mature over a period from July 2013 to July 2016. Interest on the notes is paid semi-annually based on an annual rate of 6.10 percent. Annual principal repayments of $40 million are due July 2013 through July 2016. Financial covenants require that we maintain a funded leverage ratio of less than 55 percent and an interest coverage ratio (as defined) of not less than 2.50 to 1.00. On May 25, 2012, we entered into an agreement with a multi-bank syndicate for a $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility that will mature May 25, 2017. We anticipate that the majority of any borrowings under the facility will accrue interest at a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). We will also pay a commitment fee based on the unused balance of the facility. Borrowing spreads as well as commitment fees are determined according to a scale based on a ratio of our total debt to total capitalization. The LIBOR spread ranges from 1.125 percent to 1.75 percent per annum and commitment fees range from .15 percent to .35 percent per annum. Based on our debt to total capitalization on September 30, 2012, the LIBOR spread and commitment fees would be 1.125 percent and .15 percent, respectively. Financial covenants in the facility require us to maintain a funded leverage ratio (as defined) of less than 50 percent and interest coverage ratio (as defined) of not less than 3.00 to 1.00. The credit facility contains additional terms, conditions, restrictions and covenants that we believe are usual and customary in unsecured debt arrangements for companies of similar size and credit quality. As of September 30, 2012, there were no borrowings and one letter of credit outstanding in the amount of $3.5 million. The $3.5 million letter of credit was issued to guarantee a separate line of credit for an international subsidiary. At September 30, 2012, we had $296.5 million available to borrow under our $300 million unsecured credit facility. At September 30, 2012, we had two collateral trusts totaling $26.1 million that were classified as restricted cash and included in prepaid expense and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we terminated both collateral trusts and proceeds totaling $26.1 million were returned to us. We replaced the collateral trusts with two letters of credit totaling $27.2 million. This reduced the amount available to borrow under the $300 million unsecured credit facility to approximately $269.3 million. At September 30, 2012, we had two stand-by letters of credit that were issued separately from the $300 million unsecured credit facility. One letter of credit for $0.1 million was issued by a bank on our behalf to support customs and transportation guaranties that were required to move a rig between two international locations. The second letter of credit for $0.2 million was issued by a bank on our behalf to guarantee payment of certain expenses incurred by an international transportation vendor. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we issued two letters of credit totaling $12 million to a bank for the purposes of issuing two performance guaranties required under an international drilling contract. These letters of credit were issued separate from the $300 million credit facility and therefore did not reduce that borrowing capacity. The applicable agreements for all of the unsecured debt described above contain additional terms, conditions and restrictions that we believe are usual and customary in unsecured debt arrangements for 47 companies that are similar in size and credit quality. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all debt covenants. At September 30, 2012, we had 176 existing rigs with contracts under fixed terms with original term durations ranging from six months to seven years, with some expiring in fiscal 2013. The contracts provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an early termination payment to be paid if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. While most of our customers are primarily major oil companies and large independent oil companies, a risk exists that a customer, especially a smaller independent oil company, may become unable to meet its obligations and may exercise its early termination election in the future and not be able to pay the early termination fee. Although not expected at this time, our future revenue and operating results could be negatively impacted if this were to happen. Our operating cash requirements, scheduled debt repayments, any stock repurchases and estimated capital expenditures, including our rig construction program, for fiscal 2013 are expected to be funded through current cash, cash provided from operating activities and, possibly, from funds available under our credit facility and from sales of available-for-sale securities. The current ratio was 2.4 at September 30, 2012 and 2.3 at September 30, 2011. The long-term debt to total capitalization ratio, including the current portion of long-term debt, was six percent at September 30, 2012 compared to ten percent at September 30, 2011. During 2012, we purchased 1,747,819 common shares at an aggregate cost of $77.6 million, which are held as treasury shares. During 2012, we paid dividends of $0.28 per share, or a total of $30.0 million, representing the 40th consecutive year of dividend increases. STOCK PORTFOLIO HELD September 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Atwood Oceanics, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schlumberger, Ltd. Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Cost Basis Market Value Number of Shares (in thousands, except share amounts) $363,600 $121,498 69,979 7,685 18,026 9,350 $451,605 $138,533 8,000,000 967,500 Material Commitments We have no off balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases discussed below. Our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2012, are summarized in the table below in thousands: Contractual Obligations Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 After 2017 Payments due by year Long-term debt and estimated interest (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $267,139 $ 54,205 $126,564 $44,405 $41,965 $ — $ — 16,941 Operating leases (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase obligations (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . — Total contractual obligations . . . . . . . . . $495,358 $253,722 $130,506 $47,432 $44,377 $2,380 $16,941 34,430 193,789 5,728 193,789 3,942 — 3,027 — 2,412 — 2,380 — (a) Interest on fixed-rate debt was estimated based on principal maturities. See Note 3 ‘‘Debt’’ to our Consolidated Financial Statements. (b) See Note 14 ‘‘Commitments and Contingencies’’ to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The above table does not include obligations for our pension plan or amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions. 48 In 2012, we contributed $8.3 million to the pension plan. Based on current information available from plan actuaries, we estimate contributing at least $0.1 million in 2013 to meet the minimum contribution required by law. We expect to make additional contributions in 2013 to fund unexpected distributions in lieu of liquidating pension assets. Future contributions beyond 2013 are difficult to estimate due to multiple variables involved. At September 30, 2012, we had $14.6 million recorded for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties. However, the timing of such payments to the respective taxing authorities cannot be estimated at this time. Income taxes are more fully described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES The Consolidated Financial Statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and by the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. These estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an on-going basis. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following is a discussion of the critical accounting policies and estimates used in our financial statements. Other significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment, including renewals and betterments, are stated at cost, while maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Interest costs applicable to the construction of qualifying assets is capitalized as a component of the cost of such assets. We account for the depreciation of property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets considering the estimated salvage value of the property, plant and equipment. Both the estimated useful lives and salvage values require the use of management estimates. Certain events, such as unforeseen changes in operations, technology or market conditions, could materially affect our estimates and assumptions related to depreciation. Management believes that these estimates have been materially accurate in the past. For the years presented in this report, no significant changes were made to the determinations of useful lives or salvage values. Upon retirement or other disposal of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gains or losses are recorded in the results of operations. Impairment of Long-lived Assets Management assesses the potential impairment of our long-lived assets whenever events or changes in conditions indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Changes that could prompt such an assessment may include equipment obsolescence, changes in the market demand for a specific asset, periods of relatively low rig utilization, declining revenue per day, declining cash margin per day, completion of specific contracts and/or overall changes in general market conditions. If a review of the long-lived assets indicates that the carrying value of certain of these assets is more than the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is made to adjust the carrying value to the estimated fair market value of the asset. The fair value of drilling rigs is determined based upon estimated discounted future cash flows or estimated fair market value, if available. Cash flows are estimated by management considering factors such as prospective market demand, recent changes in rig technology and its effect on each rig’s marketability, any cash investment required to make a rig marketable, suitability of rig size and makeup to existing platforms, and competitive dynamics due to lower industry utilization. Fair value is estimated, if applicable, considering factors such as recent market sales of rigs of other companies and our own sales of rigs, appraisals and other factors. Use of different assumptions could result in an impairment charge different from that reported. 49 Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as an exit price, which is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial assets and liabilities with readily available, actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and require less judgment in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial assets and liabilities that are rarely traded or not quoted have less price observability and are generally measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency of the asset, liability or market and the nature of the asset or liability. The carrying amounts reported in the statement of financial position for current assets and current liabilities qualifying as financial instruments approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of the instruments. Marketable securities are carried at fair value which is generally determined by quoted market prices. We have categorized financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 820. (See Note 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for fair value disclosures.) Self-Insurance Accruals We self-insure a significant portion of expected losses relating to worker’s compensation, general liability, employer’s liability and automobile liability. Generally, deductibles range from $1 million to $3 million per occurrence depending on the coverage and whether a claim occurs outside or inside of the United States. Insurance is purchased over deductibles to reduce our exposure to catastrophic events. Estimates are recorded for incurred outstanding liabilities for worker’s compensation, general liability claims and for claims that are incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on adjusters’ estimates, historic experience and statistical methods that we believe are reliable. Nonetheless, insurance estimates include certain assumptions and management judgments regarding the frequency and severity of claims, claim development and settlement practices. Unanticipated changes in these factors may produce materially different amounts of expense that would be reported under these programs. Our wholly-owned captive insurance company finances a significant portion of the physical damage risk on company-owned drilling rigs as well as international casualty deductibles. With the exception of ‘‘named wind storm’’ risk in the Gulf of Mexico, we insure rig and related equipment at values that approximate the current replacement cost on the inception date of the policy. We self-insure a $5 million per occurrence deductible, as well as 20 percent of the estimated replacement cost of offshore rigs and 30 percent of the estimated replacement cost for land rigs and equipment. We have two insurance policies covering eight offshore platform rigs for ‘‘named windstorm’’ risk in the Gulf of Mexico. The first policy covers four rigs and has a $75 million aggregate insurance limit over a $3 million deductible. The second policy covers four rigs and has a $40 million aggregate limit and a $3.5 million deductible. We maintain certain other insurance coverage with deductibles as high as $2.5 million. Excess insurance is purchased over these coverage amounts to limit our exposure to catastrophic claims, but there can be no assurance that such coverage will respond or be adequate in all circumstances. Retained losses are estimated and accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and, using adjuster’s estimates, our historical loss experience or estimation methods that are believed to be reliable. Nonetheless, insurance estimates include certain assumptions and management judgments regarding the frequency and severity of claims, claim development and settlement practices. Unanticipated changes in these factors may produce materially different amounts of expense and related liabilities. We self-insure a number of other risks including loss of earnings and business interruption. Pension Costs and Obligations Our pension benefit costs and obligations are dependent on various actuarial assumptions. We make assumptions relating to discount rates and expected return on plan 50 assets. Our discount rate is determined by matching projected cash distributions with the appropriate corporate bond yields in a yield curve analysis. The discount rate was lowered from 4.33 percent to 4.06 percent as of September 30, 2012 to reflect changes in the market conditions for high-quality fixed-income investments. The expected return on plan assets is determined based on historical portfolio results and future expectations of rates of return. Actual results that differ from estimated assumptions are accumulated and amortized over the estimated future working life of the plan participants and could therefore affect the expense recognized and obligations in future periods. As of September 30, 2006, the Pension Plan was frozen and benefit accruals were discontinued. As a result, the rate of compensation increase assumption has been eliminated from future periods. We anticipate pension expense to be approximately $1.2 million in 2013. Stock-Based Compensation Historically, we have granted stock-based awards to key employees and non-employee directors as part of their compensation. We estimate the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of grant by applying the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions, some of which are judgmental and highly sensitive. These assumptions include, among others, the expected stock price volatility, the expected life of the stock options and the risk-free interest rate. Expected volatilities were estimated using the historical volatility of our stock based upon the expected term of the option. We consider information in determining the grant date fair value that would have indicated that future volatility would be expected to be significantly different from historical volatility. The expected term of the option was derived from historical data and represents the period of time that options are estimated to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the estimated life of the option was based on the U.S. Treasury Strip rate in effect at the time of the grant. The fair value of each award is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for awards granted to employees. Stock-based awards granted to non-employee directors are expensed immediately upon grant. The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. We amortize the fair value of restricted stock awards to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. At September 30, 2012, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock was $13.3 million. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years. Revenue Recognition Contract drilling revenues are comprised of daywork drilling contracts for which the related revenues and expenses are recognized as services are performed and collection is reasonably assured. For certain contracts, we receive payments contractually designated for the mobilization of rigs and other drilling equipment. Mobilization payments received, and direct costs incurred for the mobilization, are deferred and recognized over the term of the related drilling contract. Costs incurred to relocate rigs and other drilling equipment to areas in which a contract has not been secured are expensed as incurred. Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses are recorded as both revenues and direct costs. For contracts that are terminated prior to the specified term, early termination payments received by us are recognized as revenues when all contractual requirements are met. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS On October 1, 2011, we adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, requiring a reconciliation of purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of financial instruments valued with a Level 3 method, which is used to price the hardest to value instruments. The adoption had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. On May 12, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and 51 Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 is intended to create consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (‘‘IFRS’’) on the definition of fair value and on the guidance on how to measure fair value and on what to disclose about fair value measurements. ASU No. 2011-04 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption prohibited for public entities. We do not expect the adoption of these provisions to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 was issued to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income (‘‘OCI’’) in financial statements. The guidance provides two options for presenting OCI. An OCI statement can be included with the net income statement, which together will make a statement of total comprehensive income. Alternatively, an OCI statement can be separate from a net income statement but the two statements will have to appear consecutively within a financial report. ASU No. 2011-05 will be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the method of presentation but the adoption on October 1, 2012 will have no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk We have operations in several South American countries, Africa and the Middle East. Our exposure to currency valuation losses is usually immaterial due to the fact that virtually all invoice billings and receipts in other countries are in U.S. dollars. We are not operating in any country that is currently considered highly inflationary, which is defined as cumulative inflation rates exceeding 100 percent in the most recent three-year period. All of our foreign operations use the U.S. dollar as the functional currency and local currency monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars with gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions included in current results of operations. As such, if a foreign economy is considered highly inflationary, there would be no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. Commodity Price Risk The demand for contract drilling services is a result of exploration and production companies spending money to explore and develop drilling prospects in search of crude oil and natural gas. Their appetite for such spending is driven by their cash flow and financial strength, which is very dependent on, among other things, crude oil and natural gas commodity prices. Crude oil prices are determined by a number of factors including supply and demand, worldwide economic conditions and geopolitical factors. Crude oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and very difficult to predict. While current energy prices are important contributors to positive cash flow for customers, expectations about future prices and price volatility are generally more important for determining future spending levels. This volatility can lead many exploration and production companies to base their capital spending on much more conservative estimates of commodity prices. As a result, demand for contract drilling services is not always purely a function of the movement of commodity prices. In addition, customers may finance their exploration activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of equity. Any deterioration in the credit and capital markets, as experienced in 2008 and 2009, can make it difficult for customers to obtain funding for their capital needs. A reduction of cash flow resulting from declines in commodity prices or a reduction of available financing may result in a reduction in customer spending and the demand for drilling services. This reduction in spending could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results or operations. We attempt to secure favorable prices through advanced ordering and purchasing for drilling rig components. While these materials have generally been available at acceptable prices, there is no assurance the prices will not vary significantly in the future. Any fluctuations in market conditions 52 causing increased prices in materials and supplies could have a material adverse effect on future operating costs. Interest Rate Risk Our interest rate risk exposure results primarily from short-term rates, mainly LIBOR-based, on borrowings from our commercial banks. Because all of our debt at September 30, 2012 has fixed-rate interest obligations, there is no current risk due to interest rate fluctuation. The following tables provide information as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 about our interest rate risk sensitive instruments: INTEREST RATE RISK AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands) Fixed-Rate Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Interest Rate . . . . . . . Variable Rate Debt . . . . . . . . . . Average Interest Rate 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 After 2017 Total Fair Value 9/30/12 $40,000 $115,000 $40,000 $40,000 $— $— $235,000 $252,705 6.1% $ — $ 6.5% — $ — $ — $— $— $ 6.1% —% —% 6.1% 6.3% — $ — INTEREST RATE RISK AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands) Fixed-Rate Debt . . . . . . . . . Average Interest Rate . . . . Variable Rate Debt . . . . . . . Average Interest Rate 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 After 2016 Total Fair Value 9/30/11 $115,000 $40,000 $115,000 $40,000 $40,000 $— $350,000 $376,882 6.4% — $ — $ 6.1% $ 6.5% — $ — $ — $— $ 6.1% —% 6.1% 6.3% — $ — Equity Price Risk On September 30, 2012, we had a portfolio of securities with a total fair value of $451.6 million. The total fair value of the portfolio of securities was $348.5 million at September 30, 2011. The fair value in Atwood and Schlumberger, Ltd. was $433.6 million or 96 percent of the portfolio’s fair value at September 30, 2012. We make no specific plans to sell securities, but rather sell securities based on market conditions and other circumstances. These securities are subject to a wide variety and number of market-related risks that could substantially reduce or increase the fair value of our holdings. Except for our investments in limited partnerships carried at cost, the portfolio is recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with changes in unrealized after-tax value reflected in the equity section of the balance sheet. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we sold our share in the limited partnerships. At November 15, 2012, the total fair value of the remaining securities had increased to approximately $437.9 million with an estimated after-tax value of $278.1 million. Currently, the fair value exceeds the cost of the investments. We continually monitor the fair value of the investments but are unable to predict future market volatility and any potential impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 53 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. The Board of Directors and Shareholders Helmerich & Payne, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. at September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Helmerich & Payne, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 21, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Tulsa, Oklahoma November 21, 2012 54 Consolidated Statements of Income HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts) Operating revenues Drilling—U.S. Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Drilling—Offshore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Drilling—International Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,678,475 189,086 270,027 14,214 $2,100,508 201,417 226,849 15,120 $1,412,495 202,734 247,179 12,754 Operating costs and expenses Operating costs, excluding depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from asset sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151,802 2,543,894 1,875,162 1,750,510 387,549 16,060 107,307 (19,223) 1,432,602 315,468 15,764 91,452 (13,903) 1,071,959 262,658 12,262 81,479 (4,992) 2,242,203 1,841,383 1,423,366 Operating income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909,599 702,511 451,796 Other income (expense) Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes Income tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,380 (8,653) — 254 (7,019) 902,580 328,971 573,609 7,355 (81) 7,436 1,951 (17,355) 913 (953) (15,444) 687,067 252,399 434,668 (487) (5) 1,811 (17,158) — 1,787 (13,560) 438,236 152,155 286,081 (125,944) 3,825 (482) (129,769) NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 581,045 $ 434,186 $ 156,312 Basic earnings per common share: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per common share: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands): $ $ $ $ $ $ 5.35 0.07 5.42 5.27 0.07 5.34 $ $ $ $ $ $ 4.06 $ — $ 4.06 $ 3.99 $ — $ 3.99 $ 2.70 (1.23) 1.47 2.66 (1.21) 1.45 Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106,819 108,377 106,643 108,632 105,711 107,404 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. 55 Consolidated Balance Sheets HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. Assets CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, less reserve of $942 in 2012 and $776 in 2011 . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INVESTMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost: Contract drilling equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less-Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) 96,095 620,489 78,777 17,555 74,693 7,619 895,228 451,144 5,743,354 215,754 62,177 284,813 6,306,098 1,954,527 $ 364,246 460,540 54,407 19,855 49,736 7,529 956,313 347,924 4,834,985 232,703 61,476 211,897 5,341,061 1,663,991 Net property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,351,571 3,677,070 NONCURRENT ASSETS: Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,142 22,584 TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,721,085 $5,003,891 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. 56 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands, except share data and per share amounts) CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 159,420 176,615 40,000 5,129 $ 103,852 192,898 115,000 4,979 Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381,164 416,729 NONCURRENT LIABILITIES: Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195,000 1,209,040 98,393 2,490 235,000 975,280 104,285 2,550 Total noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,504,923 1,317,115 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Common stock, $.10 par value, 160,000,000 shares authorized, 107,598,889 and 107,243,473 shares issued as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and 105,697,693 and 107,086,324 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less treasury stock, 1,901,196 shares in 2012 and 157,149 shares in 2011, at cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,760 — 236,240 3,505,295 166,807 10,724 — 210,909 2,954,210 98,908 3,919,102 3,274,751 84,104 4,704 Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,834,998 3,270,047 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,721,085 $5,003,891 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. 57 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. Balance, September 30, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,058 $10,706 $176,039 $2,414,942 Comprehensive Income: $112,451 1,572 $(31,129) $2,683,009 Common Stock Shares Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Treasury Stock Shares Amount Total (in thousands, except per share amounts) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive loss: Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net periodic benefit costs—net of actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared ($.22 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit of stock-based awards, including excess tax benefits of $3.9 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock issued for vested restricted stock . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,312 (22,885) (5,459) (23,337) (2,721) 4,172 (1,445) 15,855 (263) 2,519 (70) 1,445 156,312 (22,885) (5,459) (28,344) 127,968 (23,337) (202) 4,172 — 15,855 Balance, September 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,058 Comprehensive Income: 10,706 191,900 2,547,917 84,107 1,239 (27,165) 2,807,465 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net periodic benefit costs—net of actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared ($.26 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit of stock-based awards, including excess tax benefits of $13.4 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock issued for vested restricted stock . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434,186 18,414 (3,613) 185 18 (3,942) (948) 19,365 (27,893) 13,946 (3,096) 12,101 (134) 3,096 434,186 18,414 (3,613) 14,801 448,987 (27,893) 15,441 13,946 — 12,101 Balance, September 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,243 Comprehensive Income: 10,724 210,909 2,954,210 98,908 157 (4,704) 3,270,047 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net periodic benefit costs—net of actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared ($.28 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit of stock-based awards, including excess tax benefits of $3.6 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock issued for vested restricted stock, net of shares withheld for employee taxes . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581,045 63,725 4,174 315 32 5,398 47 (2,757) (29,960) 4,340 41 4 (2,485) 18,078 (51) 1,748 967 (77,610) 581,045 63,725 4,174 67,899 648,944 (29,960) 2,673 4,340 (1,514) (77,610) 18,078 Balance, September 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,599 $10,760 $236,240 $3,505,295 $166,807 1,901 $(84,104) $3,834,998 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. 58 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment for (income) loss from discontinued operations $ 581,045 (7,436) $ 434,186 482 $ Income from continuing operations Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573,609 434,668 Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from asset sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387,549 205 18,078 — (19,223) 196,931 — (160,154) (22,170) (27,758) 54,906 195 (180) (1,592) Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000,396 (64) 315,468 106 12,101 (913) (13,903) 187,651 — (2,987) (11,005) 12,623 17,362 20,483 251 6,129 978,034 (482) Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000,332 977,552 INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of TerraVici Drilling Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from asset sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations . . . . . . (1,097,680) — 39,894 — — (1,057,786) 7,500 (694,264) (4,000) 26,795 — 3,932 (667,537) — 156,312 129,769 286,081 262,658 206 15,855 — (4,992) 105,691 79 (223,916) (3,858) (12,800) 16,760 14,031 2,453 8,402 466,650 (4,362) 462,288 (329,572) — 7,867 (16) 12,516 (309,205) (55) Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,050,286) (667,537) (309,260) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease in long-term debt Proceeds from line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments on line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease in bank overdraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax withholdings related to net share settlements of restricted stock operations . . . . . . Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (115,000) 20,000 (20,000) — (77,610) (30,049) 2,673 (1,514) 3,303 (218,197) (268,151) 364,246 — 10,000 (20,000) — — (26,741) 15,441 — 12,511 — 895,000 (1,060,000) (2,038) — (22,254) (202) — 3,344 (8,789) (186,150) 301,226 63,020 (33,122) 96,142 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 96,095 $ 364,246 $ 63,020 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. 59 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Fiscal years of our foreign operations end on August 31 to facilitate reporting of consolidated results. There were no significant intervening events which materially affected the financial statements. BASIS OF PRESENTATION We classified our former Venezuelan operation, an operating segment within the International Land segment, as a discontinued operation in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, as more fully described in Note 2. Unless indicated otherwise, the information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements relates only to our continuing operations. FOREIGN CURRENCIES The functional currency for all our foreign operations is the U.S. dollar. Nonmonetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates and monetary assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. Income statement accounts are translated at average rates for the year. Gains and losses from remeasurement of foreign currency financial statements and foreign currency translations into U.S. dollars are included in direct operating costs. Included in direct operating costs are aggregate foreign currency remeasurement and transaction gains of $0.3 million in fiscal 2012 and losses totalling $1.2 million and $0.5 million in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘‘GAAP’’) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS On October 1, 2011, we adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, requiring a reconciliation of purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of financial instruments valued with a Level 3 method, which is used to price the hardest to value instruments. The adoption had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash equivalents consist of investments in short-term, highly liquid securities having original maturities of three months or less. The carrying values of these assets approximate their fair values. We primarily utilize a cash management system with a series of separate accounts consisting of lockbox accounts for receiving cash, concentration accounts, and several ‘‘zero-balance’’ disbursement accounts for funding payroll and accounts payable. As a result of our cash management system, checks issued, but not presented to the banks for payment, may create negative book cash balances. Checks 60 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) outstanding in excess of related book cash balances are included in accounts payable where applicable and included as a financing activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS We had restricted cash and cash equivalents of $31.0 million and $18.0 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Restricted cash consists of $26.2 million for two trusts established to collateralize self-insurance programs and $4.8 million for the purpose of potential insurance claims in our wholly-owned captive insurance company. Of the total at September 30, 2012, $2.0 million is from the initial capitalization of the captive company and management has elected to restrict an additional $2.8 million. The restricted amounts are primarily invested in short-term money market securities. The restricted cash and cash equivalents are reflected in the balance sheet as follows: September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28,989 $ 2,000 $16,015 $ 2,000 INVENTORIES AND SUPPLIES Inventories and supplies are primarily replacement parts and supplies held for use in our drilling operations. Inventories and supplies are valued at the lower of cost (moving average or actual) or market value. INVESTMENTS We maintain investments in equity securities of certain publicly-traded companies. The cost of securities used in determining realized gains and losses is based on the average cost basis of the security sold. We regularly review investment securities for impairment based on criteria that include the extent to which the investment’s carrying value exceeds its related fair value, the duration of the market decline and the financial strength and specific prospects of the issuer of the security. Unrealized losses that are other than temporary are recognized in earnings. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Substantially all property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets (contract drilling equipment, 4-15 years; real estate buildings and equipment, 10-45 years; and other, 2-23 years). Depreciation in the Consolidated Statements of Income includes abandonments of $16.4 million, $4.9 million and $4.2 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to direct operating cost, while betterments and refurbishments are capitalized. Effective September 30, 2012, we decommissioned four idle mechanical highly mobile rigs and two idle conventional rigs. 61 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) We lease office space and equipment for use in operations. Leases are evaluated at inception or at any subsequent material modification and, depending on the lease terms, are classified as either capital leases or operating leases as appropriate under Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 840, Leases. We do not have significant capital leases. CAPITALIZATION OF INTEREST We capitalize interest on major projects during construction. Interest is capitalized based on the average interest rate on related debt. Capitalized interest for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $12.9 million, $8.2 million and $6.4 million, respectively. VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Changes that could prompt such an assessment include a significant decline in revenue or cash margin per day, extended periods of low rig utilization, changes in market demand for a specific asset, obsolescence, completion of specific contracts and/or overall general market conditions. If a review of the long-lived assets indicates that the carrying value of certain of these assets is more than the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is made to adjust the carrying value down to the estimated fair value of the asset. The fair value of drilling rigs is determined based upon estimated discounted future cash flows or estimated fair market value, if available. Cash flows are estimated by management considering factors such as prospective market demand, recent changes in rig technology and its effect on each rig’s marketability, any cash investment required to make a rig marketable, suitability of rig size and make up to existing platforms, and competitive dynamics due to lower industry utilization. Fair value is estimated, if applicable, considering factors such as recent market sales of rigs of other companies and our own sales of rigs, appraisals and other factors. SELF-INSURANCE ACCRUALS We have accrued a liability for estimated worker’s compensation and other casualty claims incurred. The liability for other benefits to former or inactive employees after employment but before retirement is not material. DRILLING REVENUES Contract drilling revenues are comprised of daywork drilling contracts for which the related revenues and expenses are recognized as services are performed and collection is reasonably assured. For certain contracts, we receive payments contractually designated for the mobilization of rigs and other drilling equipment. Mobilization payments received, and direct costs incurred for the mobilization, are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related drilling contract. Costs incurred to relocate rigs and other drilling equipment to areas in which a contract has not been secured are expensed as incurred. Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses are recorded as both revenues and direct costs. Reimbursements for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $329.7 million, $251.0 million and $145.7 million, respectively. For contracts that are terminated prior to the specified term, early termination payments received by us are recognized as revenues when all contractual requirements are met. 62 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) RENT REVENUES We enter into leases with tenants in our rental properties consisting primarily of retail and multi- tenant warehouse space. The lease terms of tenants occupying space in the retail centers and warehouse buildings generally range from one to eleven years. Minimum rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases. Overage and percentage rents are based on tenants’ sales volume. Recoveries from tenants for property taxes and operating expenses are recognized in other operating revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Our rent revenues are as follows: Minimum rents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Overage and percentage rents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,757 $1,485 (in thousands) $8,941 $1,135 $8,613 $1,241 At September 30, 2012, minimum future rental income to be received on noncancelable operating Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 leases was as follows: Fiscal Year 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount (in thousands) $ 7,530 6,802 5,579 4,223 3,326 7,306 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,766 Leasehold improvement allowances are capitalized and amortized over the lease term. At September 30, 2012 and 2011, the cost and accumulated depreciation for real estate properties were as follows: Real estate properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 62,177 (40,882) $ 61,476 (39,665) $ 21,295 $ 21,811 September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) INCOME TAXES Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. Deferred income taxes are computed using the liability method and are provided on all temporary differences between the financial basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. 63 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) We provide for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards prescribed in ASC 740, Income Taxes, which is more fully discussed in Note 4. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in periods when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. We recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share is computed utilizing the two-class method and is calculated based on weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the periods utilizing the two-class method for stock options and nonvested restricted stock. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION We record compensation expense associated with stock options in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. Compensation expense is determined using a fair-value-based measurement method for all awards granted. In computing the impact, the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant based on the Black-Scholes options-pricing model utilizing certain assumptions for a risk free interest rate, volatility, dividend yield and expected remaining term of the awards. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the stock awards, which is generally the vesting period. Compensation expense related to stock options is recorded as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. TREASURY STOCK Treasury stock purchases are accounted for under the cost method whereby the cost of the acquired stock is recorded as treasury stock. Gains and losses on the subsequent reissuance of shares are credited or charged to additional paid-in capital using the average-cost method. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS On May 12, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 is intended to create consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (‘‘IFRS’’) on the definition of fair value and on the guidance on how to measure fair value and on what to disclose about fair value measurements. ASU No. 2011-04 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption prohibited for public entities. We do not expect the adoption of these provisions to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 was issued to increase the prominence of 64 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) other comprehensive income (‘‘OCI’’) in financial statements. The guidance provides two options for presenting OCI. An OCI statement can be included with the net income statement, which together will make a statement of total comprehensive income. Alternatively, an OCI statement can be separate from a net income statement but the two statements will have to appear consecutively within a financial report. ASU No. 2011-05 will be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the method of presentation which will be the only impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements when adopted October 1, 2012. NOTE 2 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS On June 30, 2010, the Official Gazette of Venezuela published the Decree of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, which authorized the ‘‘forceful acquisition’’ of eleven rigs owned by our Venezuelan subsidiary. The Decree also authorized the seizure of ‘‘all the personal and real property and other improvements’’ used by our Venezuelan subsidiary in its drilling operations. The seizing of our assets became effective June 30, 2010, and met the criteria established for recognition as discontinued operations under accounting standards for presentation of financial statements. Therefore, operations from the Venezuelan subsidiary, an operating segment previously within the International Land segment, have been classified as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Summarized operating results from discontinued operations are as follows: Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) $ — $ — $ 13,534 (125,944) (487) 7,355 3,825 (5) (81) Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . $7,436 $(482) $(129,769) Income from discontinued operations in fiscal 2012 is attributable to proceeds from arbitration, as more fully described in Note 14, net of expenses incurred for in-country obligations. Significant categories of assets and liabilities from discontinued operations are as follows: September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,619 $7,529 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,619 $7,529 Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,129 2,490 $4,979 2,550 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,619 $7,529 65 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 2 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued) Other current assets consist of restricted cash to meet remaining in-country current obligations. Liabilities consist of municipal and income taxes payable and social obligations due within the country of Venezuela. NOTE 3 DEBT At September 30, 2012 and 2011, we had $195 million and $235 million, respectively, in unsecured long-term debt outstanding at rates and maturities shown in the following table: September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) Unsecured intermediate debt issued August 15, 2002: Series C, due August 15, 2012, 6.46% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Series D, due August 15, 2014, 6.56% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 75,000 75,000 75,000 Unsecured senior notes issued July 21, 2009: Due July 21, 2012, 6.10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due July 21, 2013, 6.10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due July 21, 2014, 6.10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due July 21, 2015, 6.10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due July 21, 2016, 6.10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unsecured revolving credit facility due May 25, 2017 . . . . . . . . Less long-term debt due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 — 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 — $235,000 40,000 $350,000 115,000 Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $195,000 $235,000 The intermediate unsecured debt outstanding at September 30, 2012 matures August 15, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 6.56 percent, which is paid semi-annually. The terms require that we maintain a ratio of debt to total capitalization of less than 55 percent. The debt is held by various entities. We have $160 million senior unsecured fixed-rate notes outstanding at September 30, 2012 that mature over a period from July 2013 to July 2016. Interest on the notes is paid semi-annually based on an annual rate of 6.10 percent. Annual principal repayments of $40 million are due July 2013 through July 2016. We have complied with our financial covenants which require us to maintain a funded leverage ratio of less than 55 percent and an interest coverage ratio (as defined) of not less than 2.50 to 1.00. Our $400 million senior unsecured credit facility matured in December 2011 and was allowed to expire. On May 25, 2012, we entered into an agreement with a multi-bank syndicate for a $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility that will mature May 25, 2017. We anticipate that the majority of any borrowings under the facility will accrue interest at a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). We will also pay a commitment fee based on the unused balance of the facility. Borrowing spreads as well as commitment fees are determined according to a scale based on a ratio of our total debt to total capitalization. The LIBOR spread ranges from 1.125 percent to 1.75 percent per annum and commitment fees range from .15 percent to .35 percent per annum. Based on our debt to total capitalization on September 30, 2012, the LIBOR spread and commitment fees would be 1.125 percent 66 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 3 DEBT (Continued) and .15 percent, respectively. Financial covenants in the facility require us to maintain a funded leverage ratio (as defined) of less than 50 percent and an interest coverage ratio (as defined) of not less than 3.00 to 1.00. The credit facility contains additional terms, conditions, restrictions, and covenants that we believe are usual and customary in unsecured debt arrangements for companies of similar size and credit quality. As of September 30, 2012, there were no borrowings and one letter of credit was outstanding in the amount of $3.5 million. The $3.5 million letter of credit was issued to guarantee a separate line of credit for an international subsidiary. At September 30, 2012, we had $296.5 million available to borrow under our $300 million unsecured credit facility. During the first fiscal quarter of 2012, we funded two collateral trusts totaling $26.1 million and terminated two letters of credit. The September 30, 2012 balances of the collateral trusts are classified as restricted cash and are included in prepaid expense and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we terminated both collateral trusts and proceeds totaling $26.1 million were returned to us. We replaced the collateral trusts with two letters of credit totaling $27.2 million. This reduced the amount available to borrow under the $300 million unsecured credit facility to approximately $269.3 million. At September 30, 2012, we had two letters of credit outstanding that were issued separately from the $300 million unsecured credit facility. One letter of credit for $0.1 million was issued by a bank on our behalf to support customs and transportation guaranties that were required to move a rig between two international locations. The second letter of credit for $0.2 million was issued by a bank on our behalf to guarantee payment of certain expenses incurred by an international transportation vendor. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we issued two letters of credit totaling $12 million to a bank for the purposes of issuing two performance guaranties required under an international drilling contract. These letters of credit were issued separate from the $300 million credit facility and therefore did not reduce our borrowing capacity discussed above. The applicable agreements for all unsecured debt described in this Note 3 contain additional terms, conditions and restrictions that we believe are usual and customary in unsecured debt arrangements for companies that are similar in size and credit quality. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all debt covenants. At September 30, 2012, aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands): Years ending September 30, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40,000 115,000 40,000 40,000 $235,000 67 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 4 INCOME TAXES The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows: Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) Current: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $108,297 13,201 10,542 $ 42,377 14,259 8,112 $ 31,312 13,215 1,937 132,040 64,748 46,464 Deferred: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196,373 (6,484) 7,042 185,076 (4,117) 6,692 100,206 7,846 (2,361) Total provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $328,971 $252,399 $152,155 196,931 187,651 105,691 The amounts of domestic and foreign income before income taxes are as follows: Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $886,484 16,096 (in thousands) $666,073 20,994 $389,383 48,853 $902,580 $687,067 $438,236 Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. Recoverability of any tax assets are evaluated and necessary allowances are provided. The carrying value of the net deferred tax assets is based on management’s judgments using certain estimates and assumptions that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the benefits of such assets. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future, additional valuation allowances may be recorded against the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in the future. 68 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 4 INCOME TAXES (Continued) The components of our net deferred tax liabilities are as follows: September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) Deferred tax liabilities: Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,103,769 154,463 4 $ 898,657 119,464 62 Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,258,236 1,018,183 Deferred tax assets: Pension reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Self-insurance reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,482 7,737 59,730 39,833 6,533 123,315 56,564 66,751 14,260 8,344 54,967 36,672 3,224 117,467 54,709 62,758 Net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,191,485 $ 955,425 The change in our net deferred tax assets and liabilities is impacted by foreign currency remeasurement. As of September 30, 2012, we had state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of $21.4 million and $34.7 million, respectively, and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $49.9 million (of which $46.0 million is reflected as a deferred tax asset in our Consolidated Financial Statements prior to consideration of our valuation allowance) which will expire in years 2013 through 2022. The valuation allowance is primarily attributable to state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $1.6 million and $11.4 million, respectively, and foreign tax credit carryforwards of $43.5 million which more likely than not will not be utilized. Effective income tax rates as compared to the U.S. Federal income tax rate are as follows: Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 U.S. Federal income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of foreign taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35% 35% 35% 1 1 1 (1) 1 0 Effective income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36% 37% 35% We recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, and penalties in other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, we had accrued interest and penalties of $6.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively. 69 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 4 INCOME TAXES (Continued) A reconciliation of the change in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows: September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) Unrecognized tax benefits at October 1, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross decreases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross increases—current period effect of tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expiration of statute of limitations for assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,878 (4) 2,632 (242) (826) $ 5,549 (249) 2,561 434 (1,417) Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,438 $ 6,878 As of September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, our liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $8.4 million and $6.9 million, respectively, which would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. The liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties are included in other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the next 12 months, we cannot predict with certainty whether we will achieve ultimate resolution of any uncertain tax position associated with our international operations that could result in increases or decreases of our unrecognized tax benefits. However, we believe it is reasonably possible that the reserve for uncertain tax positions may increase by approximately $7.0 million to $9.5 million during the next 12 months due to an international matter. We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The tax years that remain open to examination by U.S. federal and state jurisdictions include fiscal years 2008 through 2011. Audits in foreign jurisdictions are generally complete through fiscal year 2000. NOTE 5 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY On September 30, 2012, we had 105,697,693 outstanding preferred stock purchase rights (‘‘Rights’’) pursuant to the terms of the Rights Agreement dated January 8, 1996, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 8, 2005. As adjusted for the two-for-one stock splits in fiscals 1998 and 2006, and as long as the Rights are not separately transferable, one-half Right attaches to each share of our common stock. Under the terms of the Rights Agreement each Right entitles the holder thereof to purchase one full unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (‘‘Preferred Stock’’), without par value, at a price of $250 per unit. The exercise price and the number of units of Preferred Stock issuable on exercise of the Rights are subject to adjustment in certain cases to prevent dilution. The Rights will be attached to the common stock certificates and are not exercisable or transferable apart from the common stock, until ten business days after a person acquires 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock or ten business days following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in a person owning 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock. In that event, each holder of a Right (other than the acquiring person) shall have the right to receive, upon exercise of the Right, common stock of the Company having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. In the event we are acquired in a 70 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 5 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued) merger or certain other business combination transactions (including one in which we are the surviving corporation), or more than 50 percent of our assets or earning power is sold or transferred, each holder of a Right shall have the right to receive, upon exercise of the Right, common stock of the acquiring company having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. The Rights are redeemable under certain circumstances at $0.01 per Right and will expire, unless earlier redeemed, on January 31, 2016. The Company has authorization from the Board of Directors for the repurchase of up to four million common shares in any calendar year. The repurchases may be made using our cash and cash equivalents or other available sources. During fiscal 2012, we purchased 1,747,819 common shares at an aggregate cost of $77.6 million, which are held as treasury shares. NOTE 6 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION On March 2, 2011, the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2010 Plan’’) was approved by our stockholders. The 2010 Plan, among other things, authorizes the Board of Directors to grant nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights to selected employees and to non-employee Directors. Restricted stock may be granted for no consideration other than prior and future services. The purchase price per share for stock options may not be less than market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Stock options expire ten years after the grant date. We have the right to satisfy option exercises from treasury shares and from authorized but unissued shares. There were 455,900 nonqualified stock options and 243,600 shares of restricted stock awards granted under the 2010 Plan during fiscal 2012. Awards outstanding in the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2005 Plan’’) and one prior equity plan remain subject to the terms and conditions of those plans. On December 1, 2009, we amended the forms of agreement under the 2005 Plan for awards of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options and restricted stock. We also amended existing stock option and restricted stock award agreements under the 2005 Plan. The amendments provided for continued vesting (and accelerated vesting upon death) of restricted stock and stock options effective upon a participant becoming retirement eligible. A participant meets the definition of retirement eligible if the participant attains age 55 and has 15 or more years of continuous service as a full-time employee. The amendments were applied retroactively. As a result of the continued vesting provisions, we incurred additional compensation cost of approximately $4.9 million in fiscal 2010. A summary of compensation cost for stock-based payment arrangements recognized in general and administrative expense in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows: Compensation expense Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,791 8,287 $ 7,224 4,877 $11,475 4,380 $18,078 $12,101 $15,855 September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) 71 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 6 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) Benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost of $3.3 million, $12.5 million and $3.3 million are reported as a financing cash flow in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. STOCK OPTIONS Vesting requirements for stock options are determined by the Human Resources Committee of our Board of Directors. Options currently outstanding began vesting one year after the grant date with 25 percent of the options vesting for four consecutive years. We use the Black-Scholes formula to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees. The fair value of the options is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the stock awards, which are generally the vesting periods. The weighted- average fair value calculations for options granted within the fiscal period are based on the following weighted-average assumptions set forth in the table below. Options that were granted in prior periods are based on assumptions prevailing at the date of grant. Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected stock volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected term (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0% 1.9% 2.3% 53.3% 51.6% 49.9% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 5.5 5.5 5.8 2012 2011 2010 Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities for the expected term of the option. Expected Volatility Rate. Expected volatilities are based on the daily closing price of our stock based upon historical experience over a period which approximates the expected term of the option. Expected Dividend Yield. The dividend yield is based on our current dividend yield. Expected Term. The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the expected term of options granted based on historical experience with grants and exercises. Based on these calculations, the weighted-average fair value per option granted to acquire a share of common stock was $27.70, $22.20 and $17.64 per share for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 72 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 6 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) The following summary reflects the stock option activity for our common stock and related information for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 (shares in thousands): 2012 2011 2010 Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price Options Weighted-Average Exercise Price Outstanding at October 1, Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited/Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,589 456 (314) (41) Outstanding on September 30, . . . 4,690 Exercisable on September 30, . . . . 3,575 Shares available to grant . . . . . . . 5,082 $25.84 59.68 17.24 42.21 $29.56 $24.66 5,572 324 (1,289) (18) 4,589 3,287 6,000 $22.82 47.94 18.24 34.06 $25.84 $22.35 5,401 570 (397) (2) 5,572 3,888 761 $20.55 38.02 13.63 38.02 $22.82 $19.68 The following table summarizes information about stock options at September 30, 2012 (shares in thousands): Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding Stock Options Exercisable Stock Options Options Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Remaining Life Exercise Price Options Weighted-Average Exercise Price $11.3318 to $16.01 . . . . . . . . . . . . $21.05 to $30.2375 . . . . . . . . . . . . $35.105 to $59.76 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11.3318 to $59.76 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,269 1,571 1,850 4,690 1.3 4.9 7.6 4.8 $14.18 $25.00 $43.98 $29.56 1,269 1,371 935 3,575 $14.18 $25.57 $37.55 $24.66 At September 30, 2012, the weighted-average remaining life of exercisable stock options was 3.8 years and the aggregate intrinsic value was $82.3 million with a weighted-average exercise price of $24.66 per share. The number of options vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2012 was 4,648,528 with an aggregate intrinsic value of $89.4 million and a weighted-average exercise price of $28.38 per share. As of September 30, 2012, the unrecognized compensation cost related to the stock options was $12.1 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $12.0 million, $50.5 million and $11.3 million, respectively. The grant date fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $8.1 million, $7.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively. RESTRICTED STOCK Restricted stock awards consist of our common stock and are time vested over three to six years. We recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of restricted stock awards under the 2010 Plan is determined based on the closing price of our shares on the grant date. As of September 30, 2012, there was $13.3 million of total unrecognized compensation 73 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 6 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) cost related to unvested restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years. A summary of the status of our restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2012, and of changes in restricted stock outstanding during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, is as follows (share amounts in thousands): 2012 Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share $42.38 59.76 40.21 49.75 2011 Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share $35.23 47.94 33.92 47.94 2010 Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share $30.06 38.02 29.36 — Shares 177 182 (70) — Shares 289 169 (134) (1) Shares 323 244 (119) (18) Outstanding at October 1, . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited/Expired . . . . . . . . . Outstanding on September 30, . . . . . . . . . 430 $52.52 323 $42.38 289 $35.23 (1) The number of restricted stock awards vested includes shares that we withheld on behalf of our employees to satisfy the statutory tax withholding requirements. NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER SHARE ASC 260, Earnings per Share, requires companies to treat unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividend or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. We have granted and expect to continue to grant to employees restricted stock grants that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends. Such grants are considered participating securities under ASC 260. As such, we are required to include these grants in the calculation of our basic earnings per share and calculate basic earnings per share using the two-class method. The two-class method of computing earnings per share is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Basic earnings per share is computed utilizing the two-class method and is calculated based on weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the periods utilizing the two-class method for stock options and nonvested restricted stock. 74 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued) The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share: September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) Numerator: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $573,609 7,436 $434,668 (482) $ 286,081 (129,769) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581,045 434,186 156,312 Adjustment for basic earnings per share Earnings allocated to unvested shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,246) (1,295) (404) Numerator for basic earnings per share: From continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . From discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571,363 7,436 433,373 (482) 285,677 (129,769) Adjustment for diluted earnings per share: Effect of reallocating undistributed earnings of unvested shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 22 6 Numerator for diluted earnings per share: From continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . From discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571,394 7,436 433,395 (482) 285,683 (129,769) 578,799 432,891 155,908 $578,830 $432,913 $ 155,914 Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted-average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of dilutive shares from stock options and restricted stock . . 106,819 1,558 106,643 1,989 105,711 1,693 Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted- average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,377 108,632 107,404 Basic earnings per common shares: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per common shares: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 5.35 0.07 5.42 5.27 0.07 5.34 $ $ $ $ 4.06 — 4.06 3.99 — 3.99 $ $ $ $ 2.70 (1.23) 1.47 2.66 (1.21) 1.45 75 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued) The following shares attributable to outstanding equity awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive: 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts) Shares excluded from calculation of diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . Weighted-average price per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446 $59.68 310 $47.94 554 $38.02 NOTE 8 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT The estimated fair value of our available-for-sale securities is primarily based on market quotes. The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities, which excludes investments in limited partnerships carried at cost and assets held in a Non-qualified Supplemental Savings Plan: Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Cost (in thousands) Equity Securities: September 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $129,183 $129,183 $304,396 $203,486 $— $— $433,579 $332,669 On an on-going basis, we evaluate the marketable equity securities to determine if a decline in fair value below cost is other-than-temporary. If a decline in fair value below cost is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis established. We review several factors to determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary. These factors include, but are not limited to, (i) the length of time a security is in an unrealized loss position, (ii) the extent to which fair value is less than cost, (iii) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer and (iv) our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The investments in the limited partnerships carried at cost were approximately $9.4 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011. The estimated fair value of the limited partnerships was $18.0 million and $15.8 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During fiscal 2011, we sold our investment in a limited partnership that was carried at a cost of approximately $3.0 million and had a fair value of approximately $3.9 million at the date of the sale. A gross realized gain of approximately $0.9 million is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we sold our shares in three limited partnerships that were primarily invested in international equities. Proceeds of approximately $18.1 million were received during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The assets held in a Non-qualified Supplemental Savings Plan are carried at fair market value which totaled $8.2 million and $5.9 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The majority of cash equivalents are invested in money-market mutual funds invested primarily in direct or indirect obligations of the U.S. Government. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short maturity of those investments. 76 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 8 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (Continued) The carrying value of other assets, accrued liabilities and other liabilities approximated fair value at September 30, 2012 and 2011. ASC 820 defines fair value as ‘‘the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date’’. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels as follows: (cid:129) Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. (cid:129) Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. (cid:129) Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. At September 30, 2012, our financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include cash equivalents, equity securities with active markets and money market funds we have elected to classify as restricted assets that are included in other current assets and other assets. Also included is cash denominated in a foreign currency we have elected to classify as restricted that is included in current assets of discontinued operations and limited to remaining liabilities of discontinued operations. For these items, quoted current market prices are readily available. At September 30, 2012, Level 2 inputs include a bank certificate of deposit, which is included in current assets. Currently, we do not have any financial instruments utilizing Level 3 inputs. The following table summarizes our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis presented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2012: Total Measured at Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Significant Observable Unobservable Inputs (Level 2) Inputs (Level 3) (in thousands) Assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 96,095 433,579 36,608 2,000 $ 96,095 433,579 36,358 2,000 Total assets measured at fair value . $568,282 $568,032 $ — — 250 — $250 $— — — — $— 77 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 8 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (Continued) The following information presents the supplemental fair value information about long-term fixed-rate debt at September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011. September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) Carrying value of long-term fixed-rate debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair value of long-term fixed-rate debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $235.0 $252.7 $350.0 $376.9 The fair value for fixed-rate debt was estimated using discounted cash flows at rates reflecting current interest rates at similar maturities plus credit spread which was estimated using the outstanding market information on debt instruments with a similar credit profile to us. The debt was valued using a Level 2 input. NOTE 9 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows: Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities, net of tax of $37,185, $11,047 and $(13,730) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $63,725 $18,414 $(22,885) Amortization of net periodic benefit costs—net of actuarial gain (loss), net of tax of $2,436, $(2,167) and $(3,276) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,174 (3,613) (5,459) $67,899 $14,801 $(28,344) The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at September 30, 2012 and 2011, net of applicable tax effects, were as follows: Unrealized appreciation on securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . $189,851 (23,044) $126,126 (27,218) $166,807 $ 98,908 September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) NOTE 10 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS We maintain a domestic noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain U.S. employees who meet certain age and service requirements. In July 2003, we revised the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Employee Retirement Plan (‘‘Pension Plan’’) to close the Pension Plan to new participants effective October 1, 2003, and reduce benefit accruals for current participants through September 30, 2006, at which time benefit accruals were discontinued and the Pension Plan was frozen. 78 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 10 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the pension benefit obligations and fair value of Pension Plan assets over the two-year period ended September 30, 2012 and a statement of the funded status as of September 30, 2012 and 2011: 2012 2011 (in thousands) Accumulated Benefit Obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $112,062 $104,911 Changes in projected benefit obligations Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $104,911 4,498 5,990 (3,337) $102,097 4,519 2,411 (4,116) Projected benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $112,062 $104,911 Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 67,284 14,495 8,276 (3,337) $ 61,388 (1,323) 11,335 (4,116) Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 86,718 $ 67,284 Funded status of the plan at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (25,344) $ (37,627) The amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows (in thousands): Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent liabilities-other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (95) $ (25,249) (68) (37,559) Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(25,344) $(37,627) The amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income at September 30, 2012 and 2011, and not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost, are as follows (in thousands): Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(37,172) $(43,781) (2) (1) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(37,173) $(43,783) The amount recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and not yet reflected in periodic benefit cost expected to be amortized in next year’s periodic benefit cost is a net actuarial loss of $2.7 million. 79 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 10 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) The weighted average assumptions used for the pension calculations were as follows: Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 Discount rate for net periodic benefit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount rate for year-end obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.33% 4.48% 5.42% 4.06% 4.33% 4.48% 7.16% 8.00% 8.00% We contributed $8.3 million to the Pension Plan in fiscal 2012 to fund distributions in lieu of liquidating pension assets. We estimate contributing at least $0.1 million in fiscal 2013 to meet the minimum contribution required by law and expect to make additional contributions in fiscal 2013 if needed to fund unexpected distributions. Components of the net periodic pension expense (benefit) were as follows: Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlement/curtailment Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 $ 4,498 (5,463) 2 3,567 — (in thousands) $ 4,519 (5,050) — 2,976 28 $ 4,825 (4,552) — 2,295 — Net pension expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,604 $ 2,473 $ 2,568 The following table reflects the expected benefits to be paid from the Pension Plan in each of the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter (in thousands). Years Ended September 30, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 - 2022 Total $6,477 $5,555 $5,997 $6,593 $6,350 $36,900 $67,872 Included in the Pension Plan is an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan. INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND ASSET ALLOCATION Our investment policy and strategies are established with a long-term view in mind. The investment strategy is intended to help pay the cost of the Plan while providing adequate security to meet the benefits promised under the Plan. We maintain a diversified asset mix to minimize the risk of a material loss to the portfolio value that might occur from devaluation of any single investment. In determining the appropriate asset mix, our financial strength and ability to fund potential shortfalls are considered. Plan assets are invested in portfolios of diversified public-market equity securities and fixed income securities. The Plan does not directly hold securities of the Company. 80 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 10 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) The expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the Plan’s investment portfolio after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the return and volatility of various asset classes. The target allocation for 2013 and the asset allocation for the Pension Plan at the end of fiscal 2012 and 2011, by asset category, follows: Asset Category Percentage of Plan Assets At September 30, Target Allocation 2013 2012 2011 U.S. equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56% 55% 56% 12 14 25 25 8 5 13 30 1 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100% 100% 100% PLAN ASSETS The fair value of Plan assets at September 30, 2012 and 2011, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 8, are as follows: Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mutual funds: Domestic stock funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International stock funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Domestic common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign equity stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair Value as of September 30, 2012 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (in thousands) $ 7,233 $ 7,233 $— $ — 36,209 21,458 10,069 67,736 10,543 907 299 36,209 21,458 10,069 67,736 10,543 907 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 299 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $86,718 $86,419 $— $299 81 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 10 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued) Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mutual funds: Domestic stock funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International stock funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total mutual funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Domestic common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign equity stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair Value as of September 30, 2011 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (in thousands) $ 691 $ 691 $— $ — 28,288 20,127 8,848 57,263 8,252 803 275 28,288 20,127 8,848 57,263 8,252 803 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 275 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $67,284 $67,009 $— $275 The Plan’s financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The Plan has no assets utilizing Level 2. The Plan’s assets utilizing Level 3 inputs consist of oil and gas properties. The fair value of oil and gas properties is determined by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., based upon actual revenue received for the previous twelve-month period and experience with similar assets. The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Plan’s Level 3 assets for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011: Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gains relating to property still held at the reporting date . . Oil and Gas Properties Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 (in thousands) $275 $275 — 24 Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $299 $275 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN Substantially all employees on the United States payroll may elect to participate in the 401(k)/ Thrift Plan by contributing a portion of their earnings. We contribute an amount equal to 100 percent of the first five percent of the participant’s compensation subject to certain limitations. The annual expense incurred for this defined contribution plan was $26.7 million, $21.0 million and $14.2 million in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 82 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 11 SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION The following reflects the activity in our reserve for bad debt for 2012, 2011 and 2010: September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) Reserve for bad debt: Balance at October 1, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for (recovery of) bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-off of bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $776 205 (39) $ 830 106 (160) $659 206 (35) Balance at September 30, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $942 $ 776 $830 Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accrued liabilities and long-term liabilities at September 30 consist of the following: September 30, 2012 2011 Prepaid expenses and other: Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred mobilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid value added tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 28,989 15,522 19,809 1,470 8,903 $ 16,015 10,117 8,512 3,884 11,208 Total prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74,693 $ 49,736 Accrued liabilities: Accrued operating costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payroll and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Taxes payable, other than income tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred mobilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Self-insurance liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 37,645 52,187 35,842 1,325 13,351 5,611 11,280 19,374 $ 50,415 43,077 37,789 17,075 11,281 5,452 4,073 23,736 Total accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $176,615 $192,898 Noncurrent liabilities—Other: Pension and other non-qualified retirement plans . . . . . . . . Self-insurance liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred mobilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40,142 12,385 19,364 6,766 12,184 7,552 $ 50,225 13,780 12,033 10,569 9,829 7,849 Total noncurrent liabilities—other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98,393 $104,285 83 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 12 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) Cash payments: Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized . . . . . . . . . Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,711 $144,959 $16,107 $19,621 $ 16,721 $104,028 Capital expenditures on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 do not include additions which have been incurred but not paid for as of the end of the year. The following table reconciles total capital expenditures incurred to total capital expenditures in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Capital expenditures incurred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions incurred prior year but paid for in current year . . . . . . . . Additions incurred but not paid for as of the end of the year . . . . . September 30, 2012 2011 2010 $1,082,678 61,591 (46,589) (in thousands) $730,347 25,508 (61,591) $345,264 9,816 (25,508) Capital expenditures per Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . $1,097,680 $694,264 $329,572 NOTE 13 RISK FACTORS CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of temporary cash investments, short-term investments and trade receivables. We place temporary cash investments in the U.S. with established financial institutions and invest in a diversified portfolio of highly rated, short-term money market instruments. Our trade receivables, primarily with established companies in the oil and gas industry, may impact credit risk as customers may be similarly affected by prolonged changes in economic and industry conditions. International sales also present various risks including governmental activities that may limit or disrupt markets and restrict the movement of funds. Most of our international sales, however, are to large international or government-owned national oil companies. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and do not typically require collateral in support for trade receivables. We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts, when necessary, to cover estimated credit losses. Such an allowance is based on management’s knowledge of customer accounts. Except as disclosed in Note 2, Discontinued Operations, no significant credit losses have been experienced in recent history. VOLATILITY OF MARKET Our operations can be materially affected by oil and gas prices. Oil and natural gas prices are volatile and very difficult to predict. While current energy prices are important contributors to positive cash flow for customers, expectations about future prices and price volatility are generally more important for determining a customer’s future spending levels. This volatility, along with the difficulty in predicting future prices, can lead many exploration and production companies to base their capital 84 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 13 RISK FACTORS (Continued) spending on much more conservative estimates of commodity prices. As a result, demand for contract drilling services is not always purely a function of the movement of commodity prices. In addition, customers may finance their exploration activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of equity. Any deterioration in the credit and capital markets may cause difficulty for customers to obtain funding for their capital needs. A reduction of cash flow resulting from declines in commodity prices or a reduction of available financing may result in a reduction in customer spending and the demand for drilling services. This reduction in spending could have a material adverse effect on our operations. SELF-INSURANCE We self-insure a significant portion of expected losses relating to worker’s compensation, general liability and automobile liability. Generally, deductibles range from $1 million to $3 million per occurrence depending on the coverage and whether a claim occurs outside or inside of the United States. Insurance is purchased over deductibles to reduce our exposure to catastrophic events. Estimates are recorded for incurred outstanding liabilities for worker’s compensation, general liability claims and claims that are incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on adjusters’ estimates, historic experience and statistical methods that we believe are reliable. Nonetheless, insurance estimates include certain assumptions and management judgments regarding the frequency and severity of claims, claim development and settlement practices. Unanticipated changes in these factors may produce materially different amounts of expense that would be reported under these programs. We have a wholly-owned captive insurance company which finances a significant portion of the physical damage risk on company-owned drilling rigs as well as international casualty deductibles. With the exception of ‘‘named wind storm’’ risk in the Gulf of Mexico, we insure rigs and related equipment at values that approximate the current replacement cost on the inception date of the policy. INTERNATIONAL DRILLING OPERATIONS International drilling operations may significantly contribute to our revenues and net operating income. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully conduct such operations, and a failure to do so may have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Also, the success of our international operations will be subject to numerous contingencies, some of which are beyond management’s control. These contingencies include general and regional economic conditions, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, modified exchange controls, changes in international regulatory requirements and international employment issues, risk of expropriation of real and personal property and the burden of complying with foreign laws. Additionally, in the event that extended labor strikes occur or a country experiences significant political, economic or social instability, we could experience shortages in labor and/or material and supplies necessary to operate some of our drilling rigs, thereby potentially causing an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are not operating in any country that is currently considered highly inflationary, which is defined as cumulative inflation rates exceeding 100 percent in the most recent three-year period. All of our foreign subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as the functional currency and local currency monetary assets are remeasured into U.S. dollars with gains and losses resulting from foreign currency 85 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 13 RISK FACTORS (Continued) transactions included in current results of operations. As such, if a foreign economy is considered highly inflationary, there would be no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTE 14 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES PURCHASE OBLIGATIONS During fiscal 2012, we announced agreements to build and operate 29 new FlexRigs. As of November 15, 2012, nine new FlexRigs with customer commitments remained under construction. During construction, rig construction cost is included in construction in progress and then transferred to contract drilling equipment when the rig is placed in the field for service. Equipment, parts and supplies are ordered in advance to promote efficient construction progress. At September 30, 2012, we had purchase orders outstanding of approximately $193.8 million for the purchase of drilling equipment. LEASES At September 30, 2012, we were leasing approximately 174,000 square feet of office space near downtown Tulsa, Oklahoma. We also lease other office space and equipment for use in operations. For operating leases that contain built-in pre-determined rent escalations, rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over the lease term. Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of a year at September 30, 2012 are as follows: Fiscal Year 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount (in thousands) $ 5,728 3,942 3,027 2,412 2,380 16,941 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,430 Total rent expense was $8.5 million, $5.8 million and $5.4 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. CONTINGENCIES Various legal actions, the majority of which arise in the ordinary course of business, are pending. We maintain insurance against certain business risks subject to certain deductibles. None of these legal actions are expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. We are contingently liable to sureties in respect of bonds issued by the sureties in connection with certain commitments entered into by us in the normal course of business. We have agreed to indemnify the sureties for any payments made by them in respect of such bonds. 86 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 14 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) During the ordinary course of our business, contingencies arise resulting from an existing condition, situation, or set of circumstances involving an uncertainty as to the realization of a possible gain contingency. We account for gain contingencies in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450, Contingencies, and, therefore, we do not record gain contingencies and recognize income until realized. As discussed in Note 2, Discontinued Operations, property and equipment of our Venezuelan subsidiary was seized by the Venezuelan government on June 30, 2010. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Helmerich & Payne de Venezuela, C.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on September 23, 2011 against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (‘‘Petroleo’’) and PDVSA Petroleo, S.A. (‘‘PDVSA’’). Our subsidiaries seek damages for the taking of their Venezuelan drilling business in violation of international law and for breach of contract. Additionally, we are participating in an arbitration against a third party not affiliated with the Venezuelan government, Petroleo or PDVSA in an attempt to collect an aggregate $50 million relating to the seizure of our property in Venezuela. The arbitration hearing is presently scheduled for late May 2013. While there exists the possibility of realizing a recovery, we are currently unable to determine the timing or amounts we may receive, if any, or the likelihood of recovery. No gain contingencies are recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2012, we settled another arbitration dispute with a third party not affiliated with the Venezuelan government, Petroleo or PDVSA related to the seizure of our property in Venezuela. Proceeds of $7.5 million were received and recorded in discontinued operations. NOTE 15 SEGMENT INFORMATION We operate principally in the contract drilling industry. Our contract drilling business includes the following reportable operating segments: U.S. Land, Offshore and International Land. The contract drilling operations consist mainly of contracting Company-owned drilling equipment primarily to large oil and gas exploration companies. To provide information about the different types of business activities in which we operate, we have included Offshore and International Land, along with our U.S. Land reportable operating segment, as separate reportable operating segments. Additionally, each reportable operating segment is a strategic business unit which is managed separately. Our primary international areas of operation include Colombia, Ecuador, Argentina, Tunisia, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi and other South American countries. Other includes additional non-reportable operating segments. Revenues included in Other consist primarily of rental income. Consolidated revenues and expenses reflect the elimination of all material intercompany transactions. We evaluate segment performance based on income or loss from operations (segment operating income) before income taxes which includes: (cid:129) revenues from external and internal customers (cid:129) direct operating costs (cid:129) depreciation and (cid:129) allocated general and administrative costs but excludes corporate costs for other depreciation, income from asset sales and other corporate income and expense. 87 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 15 SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) General and administrative costs are allocated to the segments based primarily on specific identification and, to the extent that such identification is not practical, on other methods which we believe to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided. Segment operating income for all segments is a non-GAAP financial measure of our performance, as it excludes certain general and administrative expenses, corporate depreciation, income from asset sales and other corporate income and expense. We consider segment operating income to be an important supplemental measure of operating performance for presenting trends in our core businesses. We use this measure to facilitate period-to-period comparisons in operating performance of our reportable segments in the aggregate by eliminating items that affect comparability between periods. We believe that segment operating income is useful to investors because it provides a means to evaluate the operating performance of the segments on an ongoing basis using criteria that are used by our internal decision makers. Additionally, it highlights operating trends and aids analytical comparisons. However, segment operating income has limitations and should not be used as an alternative to operating income or loss, a performance measure determined in accordance with GAAP, as it excludes certain costs that may affect our operating performance in future periods. 88 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 15 SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) Summarized financial information of our reportable segments for continuing operations for each of the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is shown in the following table: External Sales Inter- Segment Total Sales Segment Operating Income (Loss) Depreciation Total Assets Additions to Long-Lived Assets (in thousands) 2012 Contract Drilling U.S. Land . . . . . . . . . . $2,678,475 $ — $2,678,475 189,086 Offshore . . . . . . . . . . . 270,027 International Land . . . . 189,086 270,027 — — Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . 3,137,588 14,214 — 3,137,588 15,055 841 3,151,802 841 — (841) 3,152,643 (841) $906,968 41,775 20,366 969,109 (8,824) 960,285 — $332,723 13,455 30,701 $4,422,297 $ 991,966 8,547 52,864 160,135 467,538 376,879 10,670 387,549 — 5,049,970 663,496 5,713,466 — 1,053,377 29,301 1,082,678 — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,151,802 $ — $3,151,802 $960,285 $387,549 $5,713,466 $1,082,678 2011 Contract Drilling U.S. Land . . . . . . . . . . $2,100,508 $ — $2,100,508 201,417 Offshore . . . . . . . . . . . 226,849 International Land . . . . 201,417 226,849 — — Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . 2,528,774 15,120 — 2,528,774 15,949 829 2,543,894 829 — (829) 2,544,723 (829) $691,615 45,291 19,711 756,617 (7,682) 748,935 — $264,127 14,684 28,018 $3,719,387 $ 694,249 7,092 20,638 151,656 333,142 306,829 8,639 315,468 — 4,204,185 792,177 4,996,362 — 721,979 8,368 730,347 — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,543,894 $ — $2,543,894 $748,935 $315,468 $4,996,362 $ 730,347 2010 Contract Drilling U.S. Land . . . . . . . . . . $1,412,495 $ — $1,412,495 202,734 Offshore . . . . . . . . . . . 247,179 International Land . . . . 202,734 247,179 — — Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . 1,862,408 12,754 — 1,862,408 13,568 814 1,875,162 814 — (814) 1,875,976 (814) $404,278 53,069 48,271 505,618 (6,765) 498,853 — $211,652 12,519 29,938 $3,257,382 $ 305,206 9,982 23,865 132,342 411,339 254,109 8,549 262,658 — 3,801,063 454,037 4,255,100 — 339,053 6,211 345,264 — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,875,162 $ — $1,875,162 $498,853 $262,658 $4,255,100 $ 345,264 89 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 15 SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) The following table reconciles segment operating income to income from continuing operations before income taxes as reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income: Segment operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from asset sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate general and administrative costs and Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 $960,285 19,223 (in thousands) $748,935 13,903 $498,853 4,992 corporate depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (69,909) (60,327) (52,049) Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909,599 702,511 451,796 Other income (expense) Interest and dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of investment securities . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,380 (8,653) — 254 1,951 (17,355) 913 (953) 1,811 (17,158) — 1,787 Total unallocated amounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7,019) (15,444) (13,560) Income from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $902,580 $687,067 $438,236 The following table presents revenues from external customers and long-lived assets by country based on the location of service provided: Years Ended September 30, 2012 2011 2010 (in thousands) Revenues United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,864,570 82,247 54,317 56,448 94,220 $2,276,118 74,504 44,205 42,598 106,469 $1,572,139 57,533 55,855 52,115 137,520 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,151,802 $2,543,894 $1,875,162 Long-Lived Assets United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,039,770 81,886 84,389 38,265 107,261 $3,423,185 78,221 67,369 28,439 79,856 $2,973,712 91,322 59,798 27,772 122,416 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,351,571 $3,677,070 $3,275,020 Long-lived assets are comprised of property, plant and equipment. 90 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 15 SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) Revenues from one customer accounted for approximately 12.0 percent of total operating revenues during the year ended September 30, 2012, and 12.5 percent for years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Revenues from another customer accounted for approximately 10.2 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.6 percent of total operating revenues during the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Collectively, the receivables from these customers were approximately $108.4 million and $70.5 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. NOTE 16 SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) 2012 Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per common share: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per common share: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per common share: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per common share: Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (in thousands, except per share amounts) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter $732,588 230,539 144,297 144,286 $769,982 207,025 129,763 129,719 $819,785 232,655 149,943 149,925 $829,447 239,380 149,606 157,115 1.34 1.34 1.32 1.32 1.20 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.40 1.40 1.38 1.38 1.41 1.48 1.39 1.46 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter $594,642 170,726 104,365 104,150 $604,406 164,265 98,961 98,790 $644,095 174,418 109,828 109,826 $700,751 193,102 121,514 121,420 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.01 1.13 1.13 1.11 1.11 The sum of earnings per share for the four quarters may not equal the total earnings per share for the year due to changes in the average number of common shares outstanding. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $3.0 million, $0.03 per share on a diluted basis. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $4.9 million, $0.05 per share on a diluted basis. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $1.3 million, $0.01 per share on a diluted basis. 91 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. NOTE 16 SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Continued) In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $3.0 million, $0.03 per share on a diluted basis. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $1.7 million, $0.02 per share on a diluted basis. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $2.6 million, $0.02 per share on a diluted basis. In the third quarter of fiscal 2011, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $2.2 million, $0.02 per share on a diluted basis, and an after-tax gain from the sale of investment securities of $0.6 million, $0.01 per share on a diluted basis. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, net income includes an after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $2.4 million, $0.02 per share on a diluted basis. Performance Graph The following performance graph reflects the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total stockholder return on common stock as compared with the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Oil & Gas Drilling Index. All cumulative returns assume reinvestment of dividends and are calculated on a fiscal year basis ending on September 30 of each year. Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. S&P 500 Index S&P 500 Oil & Gas Drilling Index 4DEC201215355067 92 Directors Officers Hans Helmerich Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer John W. Lindsay President and Chief Operating Officer Stockholders’ Meeting The annual meeting of stockholders will be held on March 6, 2013. A formal notice of the meeting, together with a proxy statement and form of proxy will be mailed to shareholders on or about January 24, 2013, and the proxy statement and form of proxy will be made available via the Internet on that date. Hans Helmerich Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Tulsa, Oklahoma William L. Armstrong**(***) President Colorado Christian University Lakewood, Colorado Randy A. Foutch*(***) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Laredo Petroleum, Inc. Tulsa, Oklahoma Steven R. Mackey Executive Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel & Chief Administrative Officer Juan Pablo Tardio Vice President and Chief Financial Officer John W. Lindsay President and Chief Operating Officer Gordon K. Helm Tulsa, Oklahoma Vice President and Controller John R. Bell Vice President, Human Resources Paula Marshall**(***) Chief Executive Officer The Bama Companies, Inc. Tulsa, Oklahoma Thomas A. Petrie**(***) Chairman Petrie Partners, LLC Denver, Colorado Donald F. Robillard, Jr.*(***) Chief Financial Officer Hunt Consolidated, Inc. Dallas, Texas Hon. Francis Rooney*(***) Chief Executive Officer, Rooney Holdings, Inc. Former U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See, 2005 - 2008 Tulsa, Oklahoma Edward B. Rust, Jr.*(***) Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Bloomington, Illinois John D. Zeglis**(***) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Retired AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Basking Ridge, New Jersey * Member, Audit Committee ** Member, Human Resources Committee *** Member, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Stock Exchange Listing Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange with the ticker symbol ‘‘HP.’’ The newspaper abbreviation most commonly used for financial reporting is ‘‘HelmP.’’ Options on the Company’s stock are also traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar As of November 15, 2012, there were 620 record holders of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Common Stock as listed by the transfer agent’s records. Our transfer agent is responsible for our shareholder records, issuance of stock certificates, and distribution of our dividends and the IRS Form 1099. Your requests, as shareholders, concerning these matters are most efficiently answered by corresponding directly with the transfer agent at the following address: Computershare Trust Company, N.A. Investor Services P.O. Box 43078 Providence, RI 02940-3078 Telephone: (800) 884-4225 (781) 575-4706 Available Information Annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, earnings releases, and financial statements are made available free of charge on the investor relations section of the Company’s website as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such materials with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. Also located on the investor relations section of the Company’s website are certain corporate governance documents, including the following: the charters of the committees of the Board of Directors; the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers; the Related Person Transaction Policy; the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance Policy; certain Audit Committee Practices and a description of the means by which employees and other interested persons may communicate certain concerns to the Company’s Board of Directors, including the communication of such concerns confidentially and anonymously via the Company’s ethics hotline at 1-800-205-4913. Annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports, amendments to those reports, earnings releases, financial statements and the various corporate governance documents are also available free of charge upon written request. Direct Inquiries To: Investor Relations Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1437 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 Telephone: (918) 742-5531 Internet Address: http://www.hpinc.com 4DEC201212435137 HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC. 1437 SOUTH BOULDER AVENUE TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74119 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2012 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above