HERSHA
hersha hospitality trust
h
e
r
s
h
a
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
t
y
t
r
u
s
t
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
4
2014
(cid:13)
(cid:13)
www.hersha.com
(cid:13)
2014 financial highlights
(In thousands, except per share data)
consolidated hotel
operating results
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Year Ended December 31,
hotel operating revenues
average daily rate
occupancy
revenue per available room
$
$
$
417,226
338,064
299,005
229,156
184,998
187.82
82.6%
155.19
179.70
79.7%
143.30
175.23
78.6%
137.78
166.58
76.6%
127.64
157.11
76.7%
120.52
(In thousands, except per share data)
hersha hospitality trust
operating data: (Excluding Impairment Charges) (1)
2014
2013
Year Ended December 31,
2012
2011
2010
$
Total Revenues (Including Discontinued Operations)
Net Income applicable to Common Shareholders
Adjusted EBITDA(2) (4)
Adjusted Funds from Operations (3) (4)
419,346
54,638
162,506
102,832
396,458
44,467
145,064
86,487
364,690
8,376
143,291
76,046
329,868
)
(5,133
132,969
68,710
283,597
)
(18,871
108,329
52,067
per share data: (Excluding Impairment Charges) (1)
$
Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
AFFO
Distributions to Common Shareholders
0.27
0.49
0.26
0.22
0.41
0.24
0.04
0.38
0.24
)
(0.03
0.38
0.23
)
(0.14
0.36
0.20
balance sheet data: (as of December 31st)
Total Assets
Total Debt
Noncontrolling Interest in Partnership
Total Shareholder’s Equity
$
1,855,539
918,923
28,007
829,382
1,748,097
819,336
29,181
837,958
1,707,679
792,708
31,281
829,828
1,630,909
820,132
32,124
730,671
1,457,277
694,720
39,778
683,434
(1) Operating and Per Share Data exclude charges recorded during 2010-2014 relating to impairment losses on investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and assets
held for sale.
(2) Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, and Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) is a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of the Securities and
Exchange Commission rules. Our interpretation of Adjusted EBITDA is that EBITDA derived from our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures should be added back to
net income (loss) as part of reconciling net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA. Our Adjusted EBITDA computation may not be comparable to EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA
reported by other companies that interpret the definition of EBITDA differently than we do. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA to be a meaningful measure of a REIT's
performance because it is widely followed by industry analysts, lenders and investors and that it should be considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income,
cash flow, FFO and AFFO as a measure of the company's operating performance.
(3) Funds from Operations (FFO) as defined by NAREIT represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding
extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated assets, plus certain non-cash items, such as loss from impairment of
assets and depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We present Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO),
which reflects FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition plus the following additional adjustments: adding back write-offs of deferred financing costs on debt
extinguishment, both for consolidated and unconsolidated properties, adding back amortization of deferred financing costs, adding back non-cash stock expense, adding
back acquisition and terminated transaction expenses, adding back preferred share extinguishment costs, adding back prior period tax assessment expenses, adding back
FFO attributed to our partners in consolidated joint ventures, and making adjustments to ground lease payments, which are required by GAAP to be amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease, to reflect the actual lease payment.
(4) In these financial highlights and in the Letter to Shareholders from our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer that follows, we present
non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, hotel EBITDA, FFO and AFFO. We have provided reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to
the applicable GAAP measures in the appendix section that follows the letter to our shareholders, in portions of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014, which accompanies this Letter or can be viewed at www.hersha.com, under “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.” Because hotel EBITDA is specific to individual hotels or groups of hotels and not to our Company as a whole, it is not directly comparable to any
GAAP measure and should not be relied on as a measure of performance for our portfolio of hotels taken as a whole.
HERSHA
hersha hospitality trust
Hersha Hospitality Trust (HT) is a self-advised real estate investment trust in the hospitality sector, which owns
and operates high quality upscale hotels in urban gateway markets. The Company's 51 hotels totaling 8,259 rooms
are located in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, Miami and select markets on the West Coast.
Hersha Hospitality Trust shares are traded on The New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “HT”.
(1)
hersha total returns since ipo in 1999
338%
A
H
S
R
E
H
272%
255% 251%
209% 190% 176%
154%
125%
68%
R M Z
I n d e x
B e r k s h i
r e H a t h a w a y
s n e y C o m p a n y
I n d e x
2 0 0 0
S N L U S H o t e l
s e l
D i
R u s
t
W a l
l
R E I T
I n d e x
D o w
J o n e s
W a l
- M a r
S t o r e s
S & P 5 0 0
t
hersha portfolio by location
(2)
I n d e x
N A R E I T
I n d e x
G e n e r a l
16%
-54%
r
i c
E l e c t
F o r d M o t o r
C o m p a n y
New York City 36%
California 15%
Washington, DC 14%
South Florida 12%
Boston 10%
Philadelphia 10%
hersha portfolio by market segment
(3)
hersha portfolio by hotel brand
(3)
Upscale 46%
Upper Midscale 44%
Luxury/Upper Upscale 10%
Marriott 27%
Hilton 24%
Intercontinental 20%
Hyatt 13%
Independent 13%
Other 3%
(1) Source: Bloomberg and SNL Financial. Total Returns from January 26, 1999 through December 31, 2014. Assumes dividends are reinvested.
(2) Reflects portfolio concentration by room count for consolidated operations.
(3) Reflects portfolio EBITDA concentration for consolidated operations.
annual report 2014
hersha hospitality trust
Fellow Shareholders
Last year marked our 15th year as a publicly traded real estate investment trust. Since listing in 1999, we have delivered a 338% total
return to our shareholders, outperforming most of the market’s relevant benchmarks. Our hotel investment strategy of owning urban
transient hotels in high barrier to entry, global gateway markets in the United States is unique in the sector. The hotels that we buy
produce above market cash flows and real estate value appreciation. The strategy is total return focused, with the resiliency that comes
with the high margins we produce. Today we own over 50 hotels in the best markets in the country. The positive economic fundamentals
in our markets, and the unique combination of premium room rates and efficient operating models at our hotels, position us for several
more years of outsized earnings growth. Our skilled senior management team, which has led the Company since its IPO and successfully
navigated 3 lodging cycles, is focused on driving internal growth with value-added asset and revenue management strategies. Our external
growth emanates from a disciplined acquisitions program, with emphasis on buying hotels accretive to our already impressive operating
and earnings metrics. Last year, we generated a 31% return to shareholders, meaningfully higher than the S&P 500’s 14% return and the
Dow Jones Industrial Average’s 10% return.
Urbanization
Digitization
annual report 2014
Portfolio Performance
The positive macroeconomic environment, recovering group business, and the continued growth of international visitation to the United
States drove a rare mid-cycle re-acceleration of Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) growth. Full-year 2014 RevPAR in the United
States increased 8.3%, compared to 5.4% growth in 2013. Since 1987, the industry has recorded only 3 years of 8% or stronger growth,
with each of those years occurring earlier in their respective cycles. The Average Daily Rate (ADR) in the United States increased 4.6%
driven by robust transient demand, while full-year 2014 Occupancy increased 220 basis points to 64.4%. While 2014 was the sixth year
of a typical 5-to-9-year lodging cycle, the United States lodging sector remains squarely in the ‘middle-innings’ of what most experts
believe to be a prolonged cycle.
hersha hospitality trust
Industry fundamentals played out better than expected in 2014, with low supply growth and an acceleration of room night demand
driving revenue performance. Total hotel demand was 12.6% above the last cycle’s peak and the highest recorded in U.S. history. Group
dynamics also improved in 2014, with increased group room demand creating compression in our markets that benefited pricing power
at our transient hotels.
International inbound travel grew briskly last year despite the strengthening U.S. dollar. In 2014, international visitation increased 7%
compared to 2013, with Hersha’s geographic footprint uniquely positioned to capture a greater share of inbound international travelers
vis-à-vis peers, as our gateway markets welcomed approximately 59% of total international overseas visitors in 2014.
Our portfolio achieved record high RevPAR of $155 last year representing an increase of 8.3% compared to 2013. Portfolio ADR rose
4.5% to $188, while average hotel occupancy increased 3% to a robust 83%. Growth from higher room rates, ramp-up and stabilization
of new hotels, limited disruption from renovations, and the addition of our development projects in Miami Beach and Manhattan
produced impressive EBITDA growth. In 2014, hotel EBITDA reached $157.4 million, increasing 26.4% compared to 2013, while hotel
EBITDA margins expanded to a sector leading 37.7%.
annual report 2014
Investment Discipline
During 2014, we bought 4 strategic hotels in California, South Florida and Manhattan. In March, we closed on the purchase of the Hotel
Milo in Santa Barbara for approximately $42.0 million. This popular oceanfront hotel is an attractive addition to Hersha’s West Coast
portfolio. The Santa Barbara hotel market is one of the highest RevPAR markets in the country with minimal new supply, making the
future outlook there strong. The Hotel Milo is already producing attractive returns generating an 8.2% cash flow yield by the end of the
year.
We also purchased the 148-room Parrot Key Hotel & Resort in Key West, Florida in May for $100.0 million. The hotel is one of the most
recently built waterfront hotels on the Key, with some of the largest rooms and the most oceanfront suites in Key West. The government-
imposed ordinance limiting new hotel supply and consistent year-round demand make Key West a very desirable hotel investment market.
hersha hospitality trust
Parrot Key has exceeded our underwriting expectations producing an 8.3% yield on cost by the end of 2014, and is expected to generate
$4.2 million of incremental EBITDA in 2015. Last year, our West Coast and South Florida portfolio contributed 25% of our EBITDA
compared to 5% at the beginning of this cycle.
Later in May, we opened the brand new 205-room Hilton Garden Inn Midtown East on 52nd Street off of 3rd Avenue in Manhattan. The
hotel is ideally located in a corporate office market of approximately 20 million square feet. It is proximate to the United Nations, Grand
Central Station and Rockefeller Center, and is only the second new hotel to be constructed in Midtown East in 15 years. Within its first
year of operation, the hotel’s market value has reached $125.0 million, a $40.0 million gain to the Company.
In June, we opened the brand new 81-room Hampton Inn Downtown Financial District located just a block and a half from Battery Park
and the Ellis Island Ferry. The hotel is the Company’s 4th in the Financial District, a submarket that will benefit from 10 million square
feet of brand new, world-class office space, which is expected to drive significant transient room night demand moving forward. Ramp-
up at the hotel is strong with the hotel expected to achieve first-year ADR of $241 at 88% occupancy. Both hotels add to the quality and
real estate value of our New York City portfolio and have been immediately accretive to earnings. The delivery of the Hilton Garden Inn
Midtown East and the Hampton Inn Downtown Financial District also mark the successful conclusion of the Company’s construction and
development pipeline.
Optimization
Globalization
annual report 2014
While adding high-quality hotels to the portfolio, we also sold a number of stabilized, select service assets in suburban markets and one in
the New York City market, monetizing gains and recycling the capital into new investments. During February 2014, the Company closed on
the sale of the remaining 4 hotels of our non-core portfolio. Additionally in New York City, we sold the 70-room Hotel 373 in April to an
offshore investment group for $37.0 million, realizing a gain of $7.2 million.
We further enhanced portfolio value by executing on timely renovation projects that are generating returns now and will continue to drive
outperformance in the coming years. In 2014, we completed work at The Rittenhouse Spa, Club, Salon and Pool in Philadelphia, completing
the final element of renovations at the iconic luxury urban resort. Significant renovations were also completed at some of our hotels in Boston,
Los Angeles, Washington D.C. and South Florida. These properties are enjoying improved performance and enhanced market positioning as
a result of the renovations. At present, all of our significant renovation projects are complete. With 70% of the portfolio fully renovated in
the past 3 years, our hotels are well-positioned to leverage incremental earnings at a time in the cycle when profit potential is at its highest.
hersha hospitality trust
Capital Management
We are firmly committed to a balance sheet strategy that is both secure and flexible, and provides us with economic advantages. In the
competitive transactions market, our financial strength allows us to capitalize on investment opportunities by offering agility and mitigating
execution risk for sellers. In early 2014, we closed on a new, attractively priced $500.0 million credit facility, consisting of a $250.0 million
senior unsecured revolving line of credit and a $250.0 million senior unsecured term loan. In addition to meaningful flexibility, the facility
provides extended debt maturities and a reduced weighted average cost of debt.
In addition, during the first quarter 2014, we repurchased approximately 2.6 million of our own shares for $15.2 million at a weighted
average cost of $5.80 per share. We believe opportunistic share buybacks are an attractive use of available capital and a driver of share
value when the share price is temporarily dislocated and at a material discount to the Company’s net asset value.
At our Board of Trustees Meeting in September of last year, the Trustees voted to increase the quarterly cash dividend by 16.7% to $0.07
per share, representing an annualized dividend of $0.28 per share, a 4% dividend yield at year-end. In addition to being consistent with
our total return focus, our increased common dividend reflects growing cash flow and the sound financial health of the marketplace.
As we have detailed, the completion of our ground-up development projects and the majority of our large-scale renovation projects
undertaken in the early part of the recovery has the Company well-positioned to harvest cash flow, leverage rate driven revenue growth
and return capital to our shareholders.
annual report 2014
The Company’s goal during this cycle is to remain nimble to quickly respond to any opportunities or changes within the market. The
various corporate finance actions that took place in 2014 are supportive of this goal.
Confidence is Preparation
Our range of accomplishments in 2014 demonstrate our long-term value creation approach that has led to the Company’s meaningful
total return outperformance across the last 15 years. Our clear path for earnings and value growth is more apparent than at any point
in our years as a public company.
hersha hospitality trust
As we move into 2015 and beyond, we will seek growth in markets that we understand well and where we can leverage our differentiated
investment philosophy. Last year’s strategic acquisitions, the delivery of the development pipeline and the results of our capital recycling,
uniquely position the Company for earnings and share price outperformance.
Our cash flow generation, driven by our urban transient hotel strategy in the country’s top gateway markets, the operational advantages
the Company brings and our collaborative management structure is expected to accelerate through the cycle, further driving value for
shareholders. In the coming year, we will continue to execute on our strategy, while simultaneously remaining agile and responsive to
evolving market conditions. We are grateful for your continued trust and support for our thoughtful, absolute return approach, and we
look forward to updating you across the year on our progress.
jay h. shah
chief executive officer
neil h. shah
president and
chief operating officer
Organization
®
Hersha Hospitality Trust embraces environmental and community
stewardship as an integral part of maintaining and building a successful
business. For that reason, we created and branded the EarthView®
program in 2010 with a cross-functional team from our properties and
our corporate offices.
Through EarthView, we deliver environmental and conservation
programs that positively
impact a hotel operation's financial
performance while simultaneously improving the well-being of our
guests, our associates, our communities, and our planet.
new cadillac courtyard
miami beach tower
is leed certified
The new 93 room tower built at the Cadillac
Courtyard Miami Beach is now a LEED Certified
addition to the hotel. As built, the tower will
reduce energy use by 15% and water use by
30% as compared to similar hotels.
Sustainability
Our approach to sustainability
is
thoughtful and pragmatic, meaning we
apply a rigorous analytical methodology
to measure our financial impact, as well
as our environmental and community
impact. We are pleased with our
results and EarthView’s recognition as
an award winning program, distinguished
by its innovative and strong commitment
to sustainability practices.
Initiatives implemented as a part of the
EarthView program are designed to
achieve a positive cumulative financial
return. To date, these initiatives have
resulted in net savings of approximately
$3.2 million since the inception of the
program.
capturing sunshine
in the sunshine state
Hersha recently installed 336 Solar PV panels on the roof of its Residence Inn by Marriott
Coconut Grove property in Florida. The system captures renewable energy from the sun
and will generate over 150,000 kWh of electricity each year for use by the hotel.
annual report 2014
Over the last two years, we have focused on capital initiatives to target reductions in utility expenses with clear and timely
returns on investment. For example, guestroom energy management systems began installation across our portfolio at the
end of 2013. These systems are able to reduce guestroom heating and cooling costs by 25-35%. With a capital cost of $2.1
Million and an annual savings in heating and cooling costs of roughly $1 Million, the payback period is just over 2 years.
As a triple bottom line program, EarthView also focuses on strengthening Hersha’s commitment to the communities our
properties operate in and fostering business practices that promote the public good. Within these efforts, we embrace our
ongoing partnerships with various NGOs and Trade Organizations such as the United Way, the American Hotel & Lodging
Association Educational Foundation, Clean the World, and most recently, Water.org.
hersha hospitality trust
hersha hospitality trust
financial impact
community engagement
$3.2 million
2,600 hours
EarthView’s recorded savings since inception from
Hours volunteered by all of our associates. Over 14,000
energy initiatives implemented across our portfolio.
hours since the start of the program.
environmental performance
Local and global organizations supported by EarthView’s
215 organizations supported
13% carbon reduction
Reduced energy consumption across our portfolio
resulted in a decrease in carbon emissions per
philanthropic initiatives.
23,000 pounds of soap donated
Pounds of soap donated to Clean the World, creating
occupied room versus our baseline year of 2010.
63,000 new bars sent to developing nations.
8% water reduction
clean water projects supported
Reduced water consumption across our portfolio
Support for clean water projects around the world
versus our baseline year of 2010.
42% waste reduction
Reduced waste sent to landfills across our portfolio
versus our baseline year of 2010.
through the EarthView water initiative, which donates $1
for every 1 bottle of EarthView branded water sold.
annual report 2014
new york city
philadelphia
Hyatt Union Square, Greenwich Village
Duane Street Hotel, Tribeca
NU Hotel, Brooklyn
Hilton Garden Inn, Midtown East
Hilton Garden Inn, Tribeca
Hampton Inn Manhattan/Times Square
Hampton Inn, Madison Square Garden
Hampton Inn, Chelsea
Hampton Inn, Seaport
Hampton Inn Downtown Financial District
Holiday Inn, Wall Street
Holiday Inn Express, Water Street
Holiday Inn Express, Times Square South
Holiday Inn Express, Madison Square Garden
Candlewood Suites, Times Square South
The Rittenhouse, Center City Philadelphia
Hampton Inn, Center City/Convention Center
Hyatt Place, King of Prussia/Valley Forge
Sheraton Wilmington South, Wilmington, DE
washington, d.c.
Hampton Inn, Washington, D.C.
Capitol Hill Hotel, Washington, D.C.
Residence Inn by Marriott, Tyson’s Corner, VA
Courtyard by Marriott, Alexandria, VA
Residence Inn by Marriott, Greenbelt, MD
Hyatt House, Gaithersburg, MD
hersha hospitality trust properties
miami
Cadillac Courtyard Miami Beach Oceanfront, Miami Beach
Blue Moon Hotel, Miami Beach
Winter Haven, Miami Beach
Residence Inn by Marriott Coconut Grove, Miami
Parrot Key Hotel & Resort, Key West
west coast
Hotel Milo, Santa Barbara
Courtyard by Marriott Westside, Los Angeles
Courtyard by Marriott, Downtown San Diego
Hyatt House, Pleasant Hill/Walnut Creek
Hyatt House, Pleasanton/Dublin
Hyatt House, Scottsdale, AZ
Sheraton Hotel, JFK International Airport
Hilton Garden Inn, JFK International Airport
Hyatt House, White Plains
Holiday Inn Express, Chester
boston
The Boxer, Boston
Courtyard by Marriott, Boston/Brookline
Courtyard by Marriott, South Boston
Holiday Inn Express, Cambridge
Holiday Inn Express, South Boston
Residence Inn by Marriott, Framingham
Residence Inn by Marriott, Norwood
Hawthorn Suites, Franklin
connecticut
Marriott Downtown, Hartford
Hilton Hotel, Hartford
Mystic Marriott Hotel and Spa, Mystic/Groton
Information contained in this Annual Report supercedes the information filed
in Hersha Hospitality Trust’s 10-K filed on February 20, 2015.
Please see our website for the definition and reconciliation of our historical
non-GAAP financial measures.
section
part i
item
1.
item 2.
part ii
item 5.
item 6.
item 7.
item 7a.
item 8.
item 9.
item 9a.
consolidated financial statements
index
Business
Properties
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Mark Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
HERSHA
hersha hospitality trust
page
2
7
9
12
14
34
35
92
92
The Annual Report contains excerpts from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2014, and substantially conforms with the version filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
However, the Form 10-K also contains additional information. For a free copy of our Form 10-K, please contact:
Investor Relations
Hersha Hospitality Trust
44 Hersha Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17102
Our Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC are also available on our website, www.hersha.com. The most recent
certifications by our chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
are filed as exhibits to our Form 10-K.
annual report 2014
Item
1.
Business
OVERVIEW
PART
I
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
is
a
self-‐advised
Maryland
real
estate
investment
trust
that
was
organized
in
1998
and
completed
its
initial
public
offering
in
January
of
1999.
Our
common
shares
are
traded
on
the
New
York
Stock
Exchange
under
the
symbol
“HT.”
We
invest
primarily
in
institutional
grade
hotels
in
major
urban
gateway
markets
including
New
York,
Washington
DC,
Boston,
Philadelphia,
South
Florida
and
select
markets
on
the
West
Coast.
Our
primary
strategy
is
to
continue
to
acquire
high
quality,
upscale,
mid-‐scale
and
extended-‐stay
hotels
in
metropolitan
markets
with
high
barriers
to
entry
in
markets
with
similar
characteristics.
We
have
operated
and
intend
to
continue
to
operate
so
as
to
qualify
as
a
REIT
for
federal
income
tax
purposes.
We
seek
to
identify
acquisition
candidates
located
in
markets
with
economic,
demographic
and
supply
dynamics
favorable
to
hotel
owners
and
operators.
Through
our
due
diligence
process,
we
select
those
acquisition
targets
where
we
believe
selective
capital
improvements
and
intensive
management
will
increase
the
hotel’s
ability
to
attract
key
demand
segments,
enhance
hotel
operations
and
increase
long-‐term
value.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
our
portfolio
consisted
of
46
wholly
owned
limited
and
full
service
properties
with
a
total
of
6,587
rooms
and
interests
in
five
limited
and
full
service
properties
owned
through
joint
venture
investments
with
a
total
of
1,369
rooms.
These
51
properties,
with
a
total
of
7,956
rooms,
are
located
in
Arizona,
California,
Connecticut,
Delaware,
District
of
Columbia,
Florida,
Maryland,
Massachusetts,
New
York,
Pennsylvania,
and
Virginia
and
operate
under
leading
brands,
owned
by
Marriott
International,
Inc.
(“Marriott”),
Hilton
Worldwide,
Inc.
(“Hilton”),
InterContinental
Hotels
Group
(“IHG”),
Hyatt
Corporation
(“Hyatt”),
or
Starwood
Hotels
and
Resorts
Worldwide,
Inc.
(“Starwood”).
In
addition,
some
of
our
hotels
operate
as
independent
boutique
hotels.
We
are
structured
as
an
umbrella
partnership
REIT,
or
UPREIT,
and
we
own
our
hotels
and
our
investments
in
joint
ventures
through
our
operating
partnership,
Hersha
Hospitality
Limited
Partnership,
for
which
we
serve
as
general
partner.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
owned
an
approximate
95.8%
partnership
interest
in
our
operating
partnership.
The
majority
of
our
wholly-‐owned
hotels
are
managed
by
Hersha
Hospitality
Management,
L.P.
(“HHMLP”),
a
privately
held,
qualified
management
company
owned
by
certain
of
our
trustees
and
executive
officers
and
other
unaffiliated
third
party
investors.
Third
party
qualified
management
companies
manage
the
hotels
that
we
own
through
joint
venture
interests.
We
lease
our
wholly-‐owned
hotels
to
44
New
England
Management
Company
(“44
New
England”),
our
wholly-‐owned
taxable
REIT
subsidiary
(“TRS”).
Each
of
the
hotels
that
we
own
through
a
joint
venture
investment
is
leased
to
another
TRS
that
is
owned
by
the
respective
joint
venture
or
an
entity
owned
in
part
by
44
New
England.
Our
principal
executive
office
is
located
at
44
Hersha
Drive,
Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania
17102.
Our
telephone
number
is
(717)
236-‐4400.
Our
website
address
is
www.hersha.com.
The
information
found
on,
or
otherwise
accessible
through,
our
website
is
not
incorporated
into,
and
does
not
form
a
part
of,
this
report.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We
make
available
free
of
charge
through
our
website
(www.hersha.com)
our
code
of
ethics,
corporate
governance
guidelines
and
the
charters
of
the
committees
of
our
Board
of
Trustees
(Acquisition
Committee,
Audit
Committee,
Compensation
Committee,
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
and
Risk
Sub-‐Committee
of
the
Audit
Committee).
We
also
make
available
through
our
website
our
annual
reports
on
Form
10-‐K,
quarterly
reports
on
Form
10-‐Q,
current
reports
on
Form
8-‐K
and
amendments
to
those
reports
filed
or
furnished
pursuant
to
Section
13(a)
or
15(d)
of
the
Exchange
Act
as
soon
as
reasonably
practicable
after
such
documents
are
electronically
filed
with,
or
furnished
to,
the
SEC.
The
information
available
on
our
website
is
not,
2
hersha hospitality trust
and
shall
not
be
deemed
to
be,
a
part
of
this
report
or
incorporated
into
any
other
filings
we
make
with
the
SEC.
INVESTMENT
IN
HOTEL
PROPERTIES
Our
operating
strategy
focuses
on
increasing
hotel
performance
for
our
portfolio.
The
key
elements
of
this
strategy
are:
•
•
working
together
with
our
hotel
management
companies
to
increase
revenue
per
available
room,
or
"RevPAR"
and
to
maximize
the
average
daily
rate,
or
“ADR”
and
occupancy
levels
through
active
property-‐level
management,
intensive
marketing
efforts
to
tour
groups,
corporate
and
government
extended
stay
customers
and
other
wholesale
customers
and
expanded
yield
management
programs,
which
are
calculated
to
better
match
room
rates
to
room
demand;
and
maximizing
our
earnings
by
managing
costs
and
positioning
our
hotels
to
capitalize
on
increased
demand
in
the
high
quality,
upper-‐upscale,
upscale,
mid-‐scale
and
extended-‐stay
lodging
segments,
which
we
believe
can
be
expected
to
follow
from
improving
economic
conditions.
including
ACQUISITIONS
We
selectively
acquire
high
quality
branded
upper-‐upscale,
upscale,
mid-‐scale
and
extended-‐stay
hotels
in
metropolitan
markets
with
high
barriers-‐to-‐entry
and
independent
boutique
hotels
in
similar
markets.
Through
our
due
diligence
process,
we
select
those
acquisition
targets
where
we
believe
selective
capital
improvements
and
intensive
management
will
increase
the
hotel’s
ability
to
attract
key
demand
segments,
enhance
hotel
operations
and
increase
long-‐term
value.
In
executing
our
disciplined
acquisition
program,
we
will
consider
acquiring
hotels
that
meet
the
following
additional
criteria:
•
•
•
•
nationally-‐franchised
hotels
operating
under
popular
brands,
such
as
Marriott,
Residence
Inn
by
Marriott,
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
Hilton
Hotels,
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
Hampton
Inn,
Holiday
Inn,
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Holiday
Inn
Express
and
Suites,
Candlewood
Suites,
Hyatt
House,
Hyatt
Place,
Hyatt
and
Sheraton
Hotels;
hotels
in
locations
with
significant
barriers-‐to-‐entry,
such
as
high
development
costs,
limited
availability
of
land
and
lengthy
entitlement
processes;
hotels
in
our
target
markets
where
we
can
realize
operating
efficiencies
and
economies
of
scale;
and
independent
boutique
hotels
in
similar
markets
Since
our
initial
public
offering
in
January
1999
and
through
December
31,
2014,
we
have
acquired,
wholly
or
through
joint
ventures,
a
total
of
107
hotels,
including
28
hotels
acquired
from
entities
controlled
by
certain
of
our
trustees
and
executive
officers.
Of
the
28
acquisitions
from
entities
controlled
by
certain
of
our
trustees
and
executive
officers,
25
were
newly
constructed
or
substantially
renovated
by
these
entities
prior
to
our
acquisition.
We
take
advantage
of
our
relationships
with
entities
that
are
developing
or
substantially
renovating
hotels,
including
entities
controlled
by
certain
of
our
trustees
and
executive
officers,
to
identify
future
hotel
acquisitions
that
we
believe
may
be
attractive
to
us.
We
intend
to
continue
to
acquire
hotels
from
entities
controlled
by
certain
of
our
trustees
and
executive
officers
if
approved
by
a
majority
of
our
independent
trustees
in
accordance
with
our
related
party
transaction
policy.
DISPOSITIONS
We
evaluate
our
hotels
on
a
periodic
basis
to
determine
if
these
hotels
continue
to
satisfy
our
investment
criteria.
We
may
sell
hotels
opportunistically
based
upon
management’s
forecast
and
review
of
the
cash
flow
potential
of
each
hotel
and
re-‐deploy
the
proceeds
into
debt
reduction
or
acquisitions
of
hotels.
We
utilize
several
criteria
to
determine
the
long-‐term
potential
of
our
hotels.
Hotels
are
identified
for
sale
based
upon
management’s
forecast
of
the
strength
of
each
hotel’s
cash
flows
and
its
ability
to
remain
accretive
to
our
portfolio.
Our
decision
to
sell
a
hotel
is
often
predicated
upon
the
size
of
the
hotel,
strength
of
the
franchise,
property
condition
and
related
costs
to
renovate
the
property,
strength
of
market
demand
generators,
projected
supply
of
hotel
rooms
in
the
market,
probability
of
increased
valuation
and
geographic
profile
of
the
hotel.
All
asset
sales
are
3
annual report 2014
comprehensively
reviewed
by
the
Acquisition
Committee
of
our
Board
of
Trustees,
which
committee
consists
solely
of
independent
trustees.
During
the
time
since
our
initial
public
offering
in
1999
through
December
31,
2014,
we
have
sold
a
total
of
62
hotels.
FINANCING
We
intend
to
finance
our
long-‐term
growth
with
common
and
preferred
equity
issuances
and
debt
financing
having
staggered
maturities.
Our
debt
includes
unsecured
debt
provided
primarily
under
our
$500
million
unsecured
credit
facility
which
provides
for
a
$250
million
unsecured
term
loan
and
a
$250
million
unsecured
revolving
credit
facility
and
secured
mortgage
debt
in
our
hotel
properties.
We
intend
to
use
our
loan
capacity,
expanded
in
February
2014
as
discussed
below
and
the
undrawn
portion
of
our
$500
million
senior
unsecured
credit
facility
to
pay
down
mortgage
debt
and
fund
future
acquisitions,
as
well
as
for
capital
improvements
and
working
capital
requirements.
Subject
to
market
conditions,
we
intend
to
repay
amounts
outstanding
under
the
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
credit
facility
from
time
to
time
with
proceeds
from
periodic
common
and
preferred
equity
issuances,
long-‐term
debt
financings
and
cash
flows
from
operations.
When
purchasing
hotel
properties,
we
may
issue
common
and
preferred
limited
partnership
interests
in
our
operating
partnership
as
full
or
partial
consideration
to
sellers.
FRANCHISE
AGREEMENTS
We
believe
that
the
public’s
perception
of
quality
associated
with
a
franchisor
is
an
important
feature
in
the
operation
of
a
hotel.
Franchisors
provide
a
variety
of
benefits
for
franchisees,
which
include
national
advertising,
publicity
and
other
marketing
programs
designed
to
increase
brand
awareness,
training
of
personnel,
continuous
review
of
quality
standards
and
centralized
reservation
systems.
Most
of
our
hotels
operate
under
franchise
licenses
from
national
hotel
franchisors,
including:
Franchisor
Franchises
Marriott
International
Hilton
Hotels
Corporation
IHG
Hyatt
Hotels
Corporation
Starwood
Hotels
Marriott,
Residence
Inn
by
Marriott,
Courtyard
by
Marriott
Hilton
Hotels,
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
Hampton
Inn
Holiday
Inn,
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Holiday
Inn
Express
&
Suites,
Candlewood
Suites
Hyatt
House,
Hyatt
Place,
Hyatt
Sheraton
Hotels
We
anticipate
that
most
of
the
hotels
in
which
we
invest
will
be
operated
pursuant
to
franchise
licenses.
The
franchise
licenses
generally
specify
certain
management,
operational,
record-‐keeping,
accounting,
reporting
and
marketing
standards
and
procedures
with
which
the
franchisee
must
comply.
The
franchise
licenses
generally
obligate
our
lessees
to
comply
with
the
franchisors’
standards
and
requirements
with
respect
to
training
of
operational
personnel,
safety,
maintaining
specified
insurance,
the
types
of
services
and
products
ancillary
to
guest
room
services
that
may
be
provided
by
our
lessees,
display
of
signage,
and
the
type,
quality
and
age
of
furniture,
fixtures
and
equipment
included
in
guest
rooms,
lobbies
and
other
common
areas.
In
general,
the
franchise
licenses
require
us
to
pay
the
franchisor
a
fee
typically
ranging
between
6.0%
and
9.3%
of
such
hotel’s
revenues
annually.
PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
We
work
closely
with
our
hotel
management
companies
to
operate
our
hotels
and
increase
same
hotel
performance
for
our
portfolio.
Through
our
TRS
and
our
investment
in
joint
ventures,
we
have
retained
the
following
management
companies
to
operate
our
hotels,
as
of
December
31,
2014:
4
hersha hospitality trust
Manager
Hotels
Rooms
Hotels
Rooms
Hotels
Rooms
Wholly
Owned
Joint
Ventures
Total
Hersha
Hospitality
Management,
L.P.
Waterford
Hotel
Group,
Inc.
South
Bay
Boston
Management,
Inc.
Northwood
Management,
LLC.
45
6,742
-‐
-‐
1
-‐
-‐
148
Total
46
6,890
-‐
3
2
-
5
-‐
45
1,087
282
-
3
2
1
6,439
1,087
282
148
1,369
51
8,259
Each
management
agreement
provides
for
a
set
term
and
is
subject
to
early
termination
upon
the
occurrence
of
defaults
and
certain
other
events
described
therein.
As
required
under
the
REIT
qualification
rules,
all
managers,
including
HHMLP,
must
qualify
as
an
“eligible
independent
contractor”
during
the
term
of
the
management
agreements.
Under
the
management
agreements,
the
manager
generally
pays
the
operating
expenses
of
our
hotels.
All
operating
expenses
or
other
expenses
incurred
by
the
manager
in
performing
its
authorized
duties
are
reimbursed
or
borne
by
our
applicable
TRS
to
the
extent
the
operating
expenses
or
other
expenses
are
incurred
within
the
limits
of
the
applicable
approved
hotel
operating
budget.
Our
managers
are
not
obligated
to
advance
any
of
their
own
funds
for
operating
expenses
of
a
hotel
or
to
incur
any
liability
in
connection
with
operating
a
hotel.
For
their
services,
the
managers
receive
a
base
management
fee,
and
if
a
hotel
meets
and
exceeds
certain
thresholds,
an
additional
incentive
management
fee.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
these
thresholds
were
not
met
and
incentive
management
fees
were
not
earned.
The
base
management
fee
for
a
hotel
is
due
monthly
and
is
generally
equal
to
3%
of
the
gross
revenues
associated
with
that
hotel
for
the
related
month.
EMPLOYEES
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
had
48
employees
who
were
principally
engaged
in
managing
the
affairs
of
the
Company
unrelated
to
property
operations.
We
believe
that
our
relations
with
our
employees
are
satisfactory.
TAX
STATUS
We
elected
to
be
taxed
as
a
REIT
under
Sections
856
through
860
of
the
Code,
commencing
with
our
taxable
year
ended
December
31,
1999.
As
long
as
we
qualify
for
taxation
as
a
REIT,
we
generally
will
not
be
subject
to
federal
income
tax
on
the
portion
of
our
income
that
is
currently
distributed
to
our
shareholders.
If
we
fail
to
qualify
as
a
REIT
in
any
taxable
year
and
do
not
qualify
for
certain
statutory
relief
provisions,
we
will
be
subject
to
federal
income
tax
(including
any
applicable
alternative
minimum
tax)
on
our
taxable
income
at
regular
corporate
tax
rates.
Additionally,
we
will
generally
be
unable
to
qualify
as
a
REIT
for
four
years
following
the
year
in
which
qualification
is
lost.
Even
if
we
qualify
for
taxation
as
a
REIT,
we
will
be
subject
to
certain
state
and
local
taxes
on
our
income
and
property
and
to
federal
income
and
excise
taxes
on
our
undistributed
income.
We
own
interests
in
several
TRSs.
We
may
own
up
to
100%
of
the
stock
of
a
TRS.
A
TRS
is
a
taxable
corporation
that
may
lease
hotels
from
our
operating
partnership
and
its
subsidiaries
under
certain
circumstances.
Overall,
no
more
than
25%
of
the
value
of
our
assets
may
consist
of
securities
of
one
or
more
TRSs.
In
addition,
no
more
than
25%
of
our
gross
income
for
any
year
may
consist
of
dividends
from
one
or
more
TRSs
and
income
from
certain
non-‐real
estate
related
sources.
A
TRS
is
permitted
to
lease
hotels
from
us
as
long
as
the
hotels
are
operated
on
behalf
of
the
TRS
by
a
third
party
manager
that
qualifies
as
an
"eligible
independent
contractor."
To
qualify
for
that
treatment,
the
manager
must
satisfy
the
following
requirements:
5
annual report 2014
1.
2.
3.
4.
such
manager
is,
or
is
related
to
a
person
who
is,
actively
engaged
in
the
trade
or
business
of
operating
“qualified
lodging
facilities”
for
any
person
unrelated
to
us
and
the
TRS;
such
manager
does
not
own,
directly
or
indirectly,
more
than
35%
of
our
shares;
no
more
than
35%
of
such
manager
is
owned,
directly
or
indirectly,
by
one
or
more
persons
owning
35%
or
more
of
our
shares;
and
we
do
not,
directly
or
indirectly,
derive
any
income
from
such
manager.
The
deductibility
of
interest
paid
or
accrued
by
a
TRS
to
us
is
limited
to
assure
that
the
TRS
is
subject
to
an
appropriate
level
of
corporate
taxation.
A
100%
excise
tax
is
imposed
on
transactions
between
a
TRS
and
us
that
are
not
on
an
arm’s-‐length
basis.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ABOUT
SEGMENTS
We
are
in
the
business
of
acquiring
equity
interests
in
hotels,
and
we
manage
our
hotels
as
individual
operating
segments
that
meet
the
aggregation
criteria
and
are
therefore
disclosed
as
one
reportable
segment.
See
“Note
1
-‐
Organization
and
Summary
of
Significant
Accounting
Policies”
in
Item
8
of
this
Annual
Report
on
Form
10-‐K
for
segment
financial
information.
6
hersha hospitality trust
Item
2.
Properties
The
following
table
sets
forth
certain
information
with
respect
to
the
46
hotels
we
wholly
owned
as
of
December
31,
2014,
all
of
which
are
consolidated
on
the
Company’s
financial
statements.
Market
Name
Location
Year
Opened
Number
of
Rooms
Boston
Urban
and
Metro
Courtyard
Brookline/Boston,
MA*
Hawthorn
Suites
by
Wyndham
Franklin,
MA
Holiday
Inn
Express
Cambridge,
MA
Residence
Inn
Residence
Inn
The
Boxer
Framingham,
MA
Norwood,
MA
Boston,
MA
California
-‐
Arizona
Courtyard
Courtyard
Hyatt
House
Hyatt
House
Hyatt
House
Hotel
Milo
Blue
Moon
Courtyard
Residence
Inn
Winter
Haven
South
Florida
San
Diego,
CA
Los
Angeles,
CA
Pleasant
Hill,
CA
Pleasanton,
CA
Scottsdale,
AZ
Santa
Barbara,
CA*
Miami,
FL
Miami,
FL
Coconut
Grove,
FL
Miami,
FL
Parrot
Key
Hotel
&
Resort
Key
West,
FL
NYC
Urban
Candlewood
Suites
Times
Square,
NY
Duane
Street
Hampton
Inn
Hampton
Inn
Hampton
Inn
Hampton
Inn
Hampton
Inn
TriBeCa,
NY
Chelsea/Manhattan,
NY
Herald
Square,
Manhattan,
NY
Seaport,
NY
Times
Square,
NY
Pearl
Street,
Manhattan,
NY
Hilton
Garden
Inn
JFK
Airport,
NY*
Hilton
Garden
Inn
TriBeCa,
NY
Holiday
Inn
Wall
Street,
NY
Holiday
Inn
Express
Times
Square,
NY
Holiday
Inn
Express
Water
Street,
Manhattan,
NY
Holiday
Inn
Express
Madison
Square
Garden,
Manhattan,
NY
Hyatt
Nu
Hotel
Union
Square,
NY
Brooklyn,
NY
Sheraton
Hotel
JFK
Airport,
NY*
Hilton
Garden
Inn
Midtown
East,
Manhattan,
NY
NY-‐NJ
Metro
Holiday
Inn
Express
Chester,
NY
Hyatt
House
White
Plains,
NY
2003
1999
1997
2000
2006
2004
1999
2008
2003
1998
1999
2001
2013
2004
2000
2013
2013
2009
2008
2003
2005
2006
2009
2012
2005
2009
2010
2009
2010
2006
2013
2008
2008
2014
2006
2000
188
100
112
125
96
80
245
260
142
128
164
122
75
357
140
70
148
188
43
144
136
65
184
81
192
151
113
210
112
228
178
93
150
205
80
159
7
annual report 2014
Market
Name
Property
Name
Year
Opened
Number
of
Rooms
Philadelphia
Hampton
Inn
Hyatt
Place
Philadelphia,
PA
King
of
Prussia,
PA
Sheraton
Hotel
New
Castle,
DE
The
Rittenhouse
Hotel
Philadelphia,
PA
Washington
D.C.
Courtyard
Hampton
Inn
Hyatt
House
Residence
Inn
Residence
Inn
Alexandria,
VA
Washington,
DC
Gaithersburg,
MD
Tysons
Corner,
VA
Greenbelt,
MD
The
Capitol
Hill
Hotel
Washington,
DC
2001
2010
2011
2004
2006
2005
1998
1984
2002
2007
250
129
192
116
203
228
140
96
120
152
TOTAL
ROOMS
6,890
*
Our
interests
in
these
hotels
are
subject
to
ground
leases
which,
in
most
cases,
require
monthly
rental
payment
as
determined
by
the
applicable
ground
lease
agreement.
These
ground
lease
agreements
typically
have
initial
terms
of
99
years
and
all
have
a
remaining
term
of
at
least
85
years.
The
following
table
sets
forth
certain
information
with
respect
to
the
five
hotels
we
owned
through
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
with
third
parties
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Market
Name
Location
Boston
Courtyard
South
Boston,
MA**
Holiday
Inn
Express
South
Boston,
MA**
Connecticut
Hilton
Marriott
Marriott
Hartford,
CT
Mystic,
CT
Hartford,
CT
Year
Opened
Number
of
Rooms
HHLP
Ownership
in
Asset
HHLP
Preferred
Return
2005
1998
2005
2001
2005
164
118
393
285
409
50.0%
50.0%
8.8%
66.7%
15.0%
N/A
N/A
8.5%
8.5%
8.5%
TOTAL
ROOMS
1,369
**
The
joint
ventures
interests
in
these
hotels
are
subject
to
ground
leases
which,
in
most
cases,
require
monthly
rental
payment
as
determined
by
the
applicable
ground
lease
agreements.
These
ground
lease
agreements
typically
have
terms
of
60
years
and
all
have
a
remaining
term
of
at
least
47
years.
8
hersha hospitality trust
PART
II
Item
5.
Market
for
Registrant’s
Common
Equity,
Related
Stockholder
Matters
and
Issuer
Purchases
of
Equity
Securities
MARKET
INFORMATION
Our
common
shares
trade
on
the
New
York
Stock
Exchange
under
the
symbol
“HT.”
As
of
February
19,
2015,
the
last
reported
closing
price
per
common
share
on
the
New
York
Stock
Exchange
was
$6.80.
The
following
table
sets
forth
the
high
and
low
sales
price
per
common
share
reported
on
the
New
York
Stock
Exchange
as
traded
and
the
dividends
paid
on
the
common
shares
for
each
of
the
quarters
indicated.
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
High
Low
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7.49
6.95
6.74
6.05
High
5.94
6.21
6.24
6.30
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6.15
6.35
5.52
5.18
Low
5.33
5.18
5.27
5.07
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Dividend
Per
Common
Share
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.06
Dividend
Per
Common
Share
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
At
December
31,
2014
we
had
approximately
120
shareholders
of
record
of
our
common
shares.
Common
Units
(which
are
redeemable
by
holders
for
cash
or,
at
our
option,
for
common
shares
on
a
one
for
one
basis,
subject
to
certain
limitations)
were
held
by
approximately
38
entities
and
persons,
including
our
company.
9
annual report 2014
SHARE
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The
following
graph
compares
the
yearly
change
in
our
cumulative
total
shareholder
return
on
our
common
shares
for
the
period
beginning
December
31,
2008
and
ending
December
31,
2014,
with
the
yearly
changes
in
the
Standard
&
Poor’s
500
Stock
Index
(the
S&P
500
Index),
the
Russell
2000
Index,
and
the
SNL
Hotel
REIT
Index
for
the
same
period,
assuming
a
base
share
price
of
$100.00
for
our
common
shares,
the
S&P
500
Index,
the
Russell
2000
Index
and
the
Hotel
REIT
Index
for
comparative
purposes.
The
Hotel
REIT
Index
is
comprised
of
publicly
traded
REITs
which
focus
on
investments
in
hotel
properties.
Total
shareholder
return
equals
appreciation
in
stock
price
plus
dividends
paid
and
assumes
that
all
dividends
are
reinvested.
The
performance
graph
is
not
indicative
of
future
investment
performance.
We
do
not
make
or
endorse
any
predictions
as
to
future
share
price
performance.
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
$
S&P
500
Russell
2000
SNL
Hotel
REIT
Index
$
2008
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
2009
104.67
$
123.45
125.22
163.13
2010
220.00
$
139.23
156.90
225.86
2011
162.67
$
139.23
148.35
191.77
2012
166.67
$
157.90
170.06
210.14
2013
218.13
$
204.63
232.98
257.04
2014
285.49
232.30
244.24
339.27
10
70542_PG10-10K-final.indd 1
4/2/15 8:01 PM
hersha hospitality trust
UNREGISTERED
SALES
OF
EQUITY
SECURITIES
AND
USE
OF
PROCEEDS
A
summary
of
our
common
share
repurchases
(in
millions,
except
average
price
per
share)
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
under
the
$75
million
repurchase
program
authorized
by
our
Board
of
Trustees
in
December
2012
and
reauthorized
in
January
2014,
which
expired
on
December
31,
2014,
is
set
forth
in
the
table
below.
In
February
2015,
our
Board
of
Trustees
again
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$100
million
of
our
outstanding
common
shares.
All
such
common
shares
were
repurchased
pursuant
to
open
market
transactions.
Issuer
Purchases
of
Common
Stock
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
Average
Price
Paid
Per
Share
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
As
Part
of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
or
Programs
Maximum
Number
(or
Approximate
Dollar
Value)
of
Shares
That
May
Yet
Be
Purchased
Under
the
Plans
or
Programs
(in
thousands)
as
of
12/31/2014
-‐
-‐
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,626,854
$
5.80
2,626,854
$
Period
January
1
to
January
31,
2014
February
1
to
February
28,
2014
March
1
to
March
31,
2014
April
1
to
April
30,
2014
May
1
to
May
31,
2014
June
1
to
June
30,
2014
July
1
to
July
31,
2014
August
1
to
August
31,
2014
September
1
to
September
30,
2014
October
1
to
October
31,
2014
November
1
to
November
30,
2014
December
1
to
December
31,
2014
Total
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
2,626,854
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
75,000
-‐
-‐
(15,418)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
2,626,854
$
59,582
*
*
The
repurchase
program
was
reauthorized
by
our
Board
of
Trustees
in
February
2015,
resulting
in
an
aggregate
dollar
value
of
the
maximum
number
of
common
shares
that
may
be
purchased
as
of
February
20,
2015
of
$100
million.
11
annual report 2014
Item
6.
Selected
Financial
Data
The
following
sets
forth
selected
financial
and
operating
data
on
a
historical
consolidated
basis.
The
following
data
should
be
read
in
conjunction
with
the
financial
statements
and
notes
thereto
and
Management’s
Discussion
and
Analysis
of
Financial
Condition
and
Results
of
Operations
included
elsewhere
in
this
Form
10-‐K.
As
a
result
of
the
early
adoption
on
January
1,
2014
of
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08,
we
do
not
expect
to
classify
most
of
our
hotel
dispositions
as
discontinued
operations.
For
purposes
of
this
table
below,
the
operating
results
of
certain
real
estate
assets
which
have
been
sold
prior
to
the
adoption
of
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08
are
included
in
discontinued
operations
for
all
periods
presented.
HERSHA
HOSPITALITY
TRUST
SELECTED
FINANCIAL
DATA
(In
thousands,
except
per
share
data)
Revenue:
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
Interest
Income
From
Development
Loans
Other
Revenues
Total
Revenue
Operating
Expenses:
Hotel
Operating
Expenses
Gain
on
Insurance
Settlements
Hotel
Ground
Rent
Real
Estate
and
Personal
Property
Taxes
and
Property
Insurance
General
and
Administrative
(including
Share
Based
Payments
of
$6,028,
$9,746,
$9,678,
$7,590,
$6,649)
Acquisition
and
Terminated
Transaction
Costs
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Contingent
Consideration
Total
Operating
Expenses
Operating
Income
(Loss)
Interest
Income
Interest
Expense
Other
Expense
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
Gain
on
Hotel
Acquisitions,
net
Development
Loan
Recovery
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
$
417,226
$
-‐
180
417,406
227,324
(4,604)
2,433
30,342
20,363
2,472
69,167
2,000
349,497
67,909
805
(43,357)
(485)
7,195
12,667
22,494
(670)
338,064
$
158
191
338,413
299,005
$
1,998
212
301,215
229,156
$
3,427
330
232,913
184,998
4,686
324
190,008
188,431
(403)
985
24,083
23,869
974
55,784
-‐
293,723
44,690
1,784
(40,935)
(102)
-‐
12,096
-‐
(545)
161,982
-‐
835
19,341
23,377
1,179
48,243
-‐
254,957
46,258
1,311
(38,070)
(43)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(3,189)
121,402
-‐
877
15,936
18,449
2,734
40,562
-‐
199,960
32,953
456
(34,266)
(231)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(102)
98,930
-‐
941
13,738
16,833
4,785
34,060
-‐
169,287
20,721
168
(32,409)
(240)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(852)
Income
(Loss)
before
(Loss)
Income
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
and
Discontinued
Operations
66,558
16,988
6,267
(1,190)
(12,612)
(Loss)
Income
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
693
(22)
(232)
210
(1,751)
Impairment
of
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
(Loss)
Gain
from
Remeasurement
of
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
(Loss)
Income
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
Income
(Loss)
Before
Income
Taxes
Income
Tax
Benefit
Income
(Loss)
from
Continuing
Operations
Discontinued
Operations:
Gain(Loss)
on
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
Impairment
of
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Income
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
Income
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
Net
Income
(Loss)
(Income)
Loss
Allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Issuance
Costs
of
Redeemed
Preferred
Shares
Preferred
Distributions
Net
Income
(Loss)
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
$
-‐
(1,813)
-‐
(1,677)
-‐
-‐
693
67,251
2,685
69,936
-‐
(1,835)
15,153
5,600
20,753
(128)
(1,800)
263
(1,665)
68,271
(1,016)
-‐
(14,356)
52,899
$
32,121
(10,314)
7,388
29,195
49,948
(335)
(2,250)
(14,611)
32,752
$
(1,892)
(2,124)
4,143
3,355
7,498
11,231
-‐
3,489
14,720
22,218
158
-‐
(14,000)
8,376
$
2,757
1,290
100
-‐
100
991
(30,248)
2,189
(27,068)
(26,968)
1,734
-‐
(10,499)
(35,733)
$
4,008
2,257
(10,355)
-‐
(10,355)
347
(2,433)
(4,761)
(6,847)
(17,202)
845
-‐
(4,800)
(21,157)
12
hersha hospitality trust
HERSHA
HOSPITALITY
TRUST
SELECTED
FINANCIAL
DATA
(In
thousands,
except
per
share
data)
Basic
Income
(Loss)
from
Continuing
Operations
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Diluted
Income
(Loss)
from
Continuing
Operations
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
(1)
Dividends
declared
per
Common
Share
$
0.27
$
0.02
$
(0.03)
$
(0.06)
$
(0.11)
0.27
0.26
0.02
0.24
(0.03)
0.24
(0.06)
0.23
(0.11)
0.20
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Balance
Sheet
Data
Net
investment
in
hotel
properties
$
1,745,483
$
1,535,835
$
1,466,713
$
1,341,536
$
1,245,851
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Noncontrolling
Interests
Common
Units
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interest
Noncontrolling
Interests
Consolidated
Joint
Ventures
-‐
29,082
56,583
29,523
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Noncontrolling
Interests
Consolidated
Variable
Interest
Entity
(1,075)
(342)
-‐
15,484
15,321
-‐
476
93,829
16,862
14,955
307
-‐
-‐
19,410
19,894
474
-‐
Shareholder's
equity
Total
assets
Total
debt
829,382
837,958
829,828
730,673
683,434
1,855,539
1,748,097
1,707,679
1,630,909
1,457,277
918,923
773,501
792,708
758,374
694,720
Liabilities
related
to
Assets
Held
for
Sale
-‐
45,835
-‐
61,758
-‐
Other
Data
Net
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
Net
cash
used
in
investing
activities
Net
cash
provided
by
financing
activities
Weighted
average
shares
outstanding
Basic
Diluted
(1)
$
$
$
112,894
$
90,261
$
71,756
$
58,668
$
42,486
(180,504)
$
(125,474)
$
(55,817)
$
(230,758)
$
(310,567)
53,072
$
2,367
$
28,552
$
131,062
$
322,273
199,109,209
198,390,450
187,415,270
168,753,382
134,370,172
201,197,310
201,918,177
187,415,270
168,753,382
134,370,172
(1)
Income
allocated
to
noncontrolling
interest
in
HHLP
has
been
excluded
from
the
numerator
and
Common
Units
have
been
omitted
from
the
denominator
for
the
purpose
of
computing
diluted
earnings
per
share
because
the
effect
of
including
these
amounts
in
the
numerator
and
denominator
would
have
no
impact.
13
annual report 2014
Item
7.
Management’s
Discussion
and
Analysis
of
Financial
Condition
and
Results
of
Operations
Certain
statements
appearing
in
this
Item
7
are
forward-‐looking
statements
within
the
meaning
of
the
federal
securities
laws.
Our
actual
results
may
differ
materially.
We
caution
you
not
to
place
undue
reliance
on
any
such
forward-‐looking
statements.
See
“Cautionary
Factors
That
May
Affect
Future
Results”
for
additional
information
regarding
our
forward-‐looking
statements.
BACKGROUND
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
owned
interests
in
51
hotels
in
major
urban
gateway
markets
including
New
York,
Washington
DC,
Boston,
Philadelphia,
San
Diego,
Los
Angeles
and
Miami,
including
46
wholly-‐owned
hotels
and
interests
in
five
hotels
owned
through
unconsolidated
joint
ventures.
Our
"Summary
of
Operating
Results"
section
below
contains
operating
results
for
46
consolidated
hotel
assets
and
five
hotel
assets
owned
through
unconsolidated
joint
ventures.
We
have
elected
to
be
taxed
as
a
REIT
for
federal
income
tax
purposes,
beginning
with
the
taxable
year
ended
December
31,
1999.
For
purposes
of
the
REIT
qualification
rules,
we
cannot
directly
operate
any
of
our
hotels.
Instead,
we
must
lease
our
hotels
to
a
third
party
lessee
or
to
a
TRS,
provided
that
the
TRS
engages
an
eligible
independent
contractor
to
manage
the
hotels.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
have
leased
all
of
our
hotels
to
a
wholly-‐owned
TRS,
a
joint
venture
owned
TRS,
or
an
entity
owned
by
our
wholly-‐owned
TRS.
Each
of
these
TRS
entities
will
pay
qualifying
rent,
and
the
TRS
entities
have
entered
into
management
contracts
with
qualified
independent
managers,
including
HHMLP,
with
respect
to
our
hotels.
We
intend
to
lease
all
newly
acquired
hotels
to
a
TRS.
The
TRS
structure
enables
us
to
participate
more
directly
in
the
operating
performance
of
our
hotels.
The
TRS
directly
receives
all
revenue
from,
and
funds
all
expenses
relating
to,
hotel
operations.
The
TRS
is
also
subject
to
income
tax
on
its
earnings.
OVERVIEW
We
believe
the
improvements
in
our
equity
and
debt
capitalization
and
repositioning
of
our
portfolio
better
enables
us
to
capitalize
on
further
improvement
in
lodging
fundamentals.
During
2014,
we
continued
to
see
improvements
in
ADR,
RevPAR
and
operating
margins,
led
by
hotels
in
most
of
our
major
locations.
We
continue
to
seek
acquisition
opportunities
in
urban
centers
and
central
business
districts.
In
addition,
we
will
continue
to
look
for
attractive
opportunities
to
dispose
of
properties
in
secondary
and
tertiary
markets
at
favorable
prices,
potentially
redeploying
that
capital
in
our
focus
markets.
We
do
not
expect
to
actively
pursue
acquisitions
made
through
joint
ventures
in
the
near
term;
however,
we
may
seek
to
buy
out,
or
sell
our
joint
venture
interests
to,
select
existing
joint
venture
partners.
We
do
not
expect
to
actively
pursue
development
loans
or
land
leases
in
the
near
term.
Although
we
expect
continued
stabilization
and
improvement
in
consumer
and
commercial
spending
and
lodging
demand
during
2015,
the
manner
in
which
the
economy
will
continue
to
grow,
if
at
all,
is
not
predictable.
In
addition,
the
availability
of
hotel-‐level
financing
for
the
acquisition
of
new
hotels
is
not
within
our
control.
As
a
result,
there
can
be
no
assurances
that
we
will
be
able
to
grow
hotel
revenues,
occupancy,
ADR
or
RevPAR
at
our
properties
as
we
hope.
Factors
that
might
contribute
to
less
than
anticipated
performance
include
those
described
under
the
heading
“Item
1A.
Risk
Factors”
and
other
documents
that
we
may
file
with
the
SEC
in
the
future.
We
will
continue
to
cautiously
monitor
recovery
in
lodging
demand
and
rates,
our
third
party
hotel
managers
and
our
performance
generally.
14
hersha hospitality trust
SUMMARY
OF
OPERATING
RESULTS
The
following
table
outlines
operating
results
for
the
Company’s
portfolio
of
wholly
owned
hotels
and
those
owned
through
joint
venture
interests
(excluding
hotel
assets
classified
as
discontinued
operations)
that
are
consolidated
in
our
financial
statements
for
the
three
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012.
CONSOLIDATED
HOTELS:
Year
Ended
2014
Year
Ended
2013
2014
vs.
2013
%
Variance
Year
Ended
2012
2013
vs.
2012
%
Variance
Occupancy
$
Average
Daily
Rate
(ADR)
Revenue
Per
Available
Room
(RevPAR)
$
82.6%
187.82
$
155.19
$
79.7%
179.70
143.30
2.9%
4.5%
8.3%
78.6%
175.23
137.78
$
$
1.1%
2.6%
4.0%
Room
Revenues
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
$
$
380,461
$
417,226
$
309,452
338,064
22.9%
23.4%
$
$
273,410
299,005
13.2%
13.1%
RevPAR
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
increased
8.3%
for
our
consolidated
hotels
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2013.
This
increase
represents
a
continued
growth
trend
in
RevPAR,
which
is
primarily
due
to
the
improving
economic
conditions
in
2014
and
the
acquisition
of
hotel
properties
consummated
in
2014
that
are
accretive
to
RevPAR.
The
increase,
as
noted
in
the
table
above,
was
the
result
of
increases
in
both
occupancy
and
ADR.
Performing
particularly
well
in
2014
were
hotels
in
our
Boston,
West
Coast,
South
Florida
and
Washington
DC
markets,
each
of
which
posted
RevPAR
growth
in
excess
of
11.0%
versus
the
same
period
in
2013.
The
following
table
outlines
operating
results
for
the
three
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
for
hotels
we
own
through
unconsolidated
joint
venture
interests
(excluding
those
hotel
assets
have
been
sold
to
an
independent
third
party
during
the
period
presented).
These
operating
results
reflect
100%
of
the
operating
results
of
the
property
including
our
interest
and
the
interests
of
our
joint
venture
partners
and
other
noncontrolling
interest
holders.
UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT
VENTURES:
Year
Ended
2014
Year
Ended
2013
2014
vs.
2013
%
Variance
Year
Ended
2012
2013
vs.
2012
%
Variance
Occupancy
67.2%
68.3%
-‐1.1%
68.6%
-‐0.3%
Average
Daily
Rate
(ADR)
$
164.10
$
154.57
Revenue
Per
Available
Room
(RevPAR)
$
110.33
$
105.52
6.2%
4.6%
$
$
152.51
104.66
Room
Revenues
Total
Revenues
$
$
59,135
$
58,273
80,860
$
80,879
1.5%
0.0%
$
$
62,058
84,364
1.4%
0.8%
-‐6.1%
-‐4.1%
15
annual report 2014
For
our
unconsolidated
hotels,
RevPAR
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
increased
4.6%
compared
to
RevPAR
achieved
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
The
2014
results
reflect
the
overall
condition
of
the
market
in
which
our
unconsolidated
joint
venture
hotels
operate,
particularly
Boston,
where
our
2
hotels
posted
RevPAR
growth
of
15.1%.
The
relatively
stable
results
in
RevPar
during
the
year
of
2013
when
compared
to
the
year
of
2012
is
primarily
the
result
of
a
joint
venture
asset
which
is
now
consolidated
for
financial
reporting
purposes
and
therefore
no
longer
contributes
to
the
operating
results
of
our
portfolio
of
unconsolidated
hotels.
The
Holiday
Inn
Express
29th
Street,
New
York,
NY,
which
as
of
June
18,
2012,
no
longer
was
included
in
our
unconsolidated
joint
venture
hotel
portfolio,
tended
to
have
higher
occupancy
and
ADR
than
the
remaining
hotels
in
our
unconsolidated
joint
venture
portfolio,
resulting
in
the
lower
room
revenues
and
total
revenues
in
the
above
table.
When
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2012,
the
remaining
unconsolidated
joint
venture
hotels
follow
the
same
growth
trend
for
RevPar
as
experienced
in
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels
reported
below
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
We
define
a
same
store
consolidated
hotel
as
one
that
is
currently
consolidated,
that
we
have
owned
in
whole
or
in
part
for
the
entire
period
being
reported
and
the
comparable
period
in
each
of
the
periods
being
presented,
and
is
deemed
fully
operational.
Based
on
this
definition,
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
there
are
34
same
store
consolidated
hotels
and
31
same
store
consolidated
hotels
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2013
and
2012.
The
following
table
outlines
operating
results
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
for
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels:
SAME
STORE
CONSOLIDATED
HOTELS:
(includes
34
hotels
in
both
years)
2014
vs.
2013
%
Variance
Year
Ended
2013
Year
Ended
2014
(includes
31
hotels
in
both
years)
Year
Ended
2013
Year
Ended
2012
2013
vs.
2012
%
Variance
Occupancy
Average
Daily
Rate
(ADR)
Revenue
Per
Available
Room
(RevPAR)
82.9%
179.76
$
79.7%
176.85
$
3.2%
1.6%
80.5%
174.65
$
78.6%
172.67
$
1.9%
1.1%
$
148.97
$
140.95
5.7%
$
140.55
$
135.69
3.6%
Room
Revenues
Total
Revenues
$
280,421
$
265,142
$
305,961
$
288,635
5.8%
6.0%
$
258,047
$
$
272,780
$
249,848
263,893
3.3%
3.4%
Driven
by
strong
performance
in
our
Boston,
West
Coast,
and
Washington
DC
markets,
RevPAR
for
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels
increased
5.7%,
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2013.
COMPARISON
OF
THE
YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER
31,
2014
TO
DECEMBER
31,
2013
(dollars
in
thousands,
except
ADR
and
per
share
data)
Revenue
Our
total
revenues
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
2013
primarily
consisted
of
hotel
operating
revenues
and
other
revenue.
Hotel
operating
revenues
were
approximately
100.0%
and
99.9%
of
total
revenues
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
respectively.
Hotel
operating
revenues
are
recorded
for
wholly
owned
hotels
that
are
leased
to
our
wholly
owned
TRS
and
hotels
owned
through
joint
venture
interests
that
were
consolidated
in
our
financial
statements
during
the
period.
Hotel
operating
revenues
increased
$79,162,
or
23.4%,
from
$338,064
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
to
$417,226
for
the
same
period
in
2014.
This
increase
in
hotel
operating
revenues
was
primarily
attributable
to
the
acquisitions
consummated
in
2014
and
2013
as
well
as
increases
in
hotel
operating
revenues
for
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels.
16
hersha hospitality trust
Since
December
31,
2013,
we
have
acquired
interests
in
three
consolidated
hotels
and
have
commenced
operations
at
the
Hampton
Inn
Pearl
Street.
These
four
hotels
contributed
the
following
operating
revenues
for
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014.
Brand
Location
Acquisition
Date
Rooms
2014
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
Hotel
Milo
Parrot
Key
Resort
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street
Hampton
Inn
Pearl
Street
Santa
Barbara,
CA
February
28,
2014
Key
West,
FL
May
7,
2014
New
York,
NY
May
30,
2014*
New
York,
NY
June
23,
2014*
*
Date
the
hotel
began
operations.
122
148
205
81
556
$
8,655
9,145
10,439
2,867
31,106
Revenues
for
all
hotels
were
recorded
from
the
date
of
acquisition
as
hotel
operating
revenues.
Further,
hotel
operating
revenues
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
included
revenues
for
the
following
hotels
that
were
purchased
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Hotels
acquired
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
would
have
a
full
year
of
results
included
in
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
but
not
necessarily
a
full
year
of
results
during
the
same
period
in
2013.
We
acquired
interests
in
the
following
consolidated
hotels
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013:
Brand
Location
Acquisition
Date
Rooms
2014
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
2013
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
Hyatt
Union
Square
New
York,
NY
April
9,
2013
178
$
19,066
$
Courtyard
by
Marriott
San
Diego,
CA
May
30,
2013
Residence
Inn
Coconut
Grove,
FL
June
12,
2013
Winter
Haven
Miami,
FL
December
20,
2013
Blue
Moon
Miami,
FL
December
20,
2013
245
140
70
75
16,205
4,424
4,185
4,446
11,272
8,350
2,889
203
175
708
$
48,326
$
22,889
In
addition,
our
same
store
consolidated
portfolio
experienced
improvements
in
ADR
and
occupancy
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2013.
Occupancy
in
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels
increased
320
basis
points
from
79.7%
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
to
82.9%
for
the
same
period
in
2014.
ADR
improved
1.6%,
increasing
from
$176.85
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
to
$179.76
during
the
same
period
in
2014.
These
improvements
were
due
to
improvements
in
lodging
trends
in
the
markets
in
which
our
hotels
are
located.
Expenses
Total
hotel
operating
expenses
increased
20.6%
to
approximately
$227,324
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
from
$188,431
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Consistent
with
the
increase
in
hotel
operating
revenues,
hotel
operating
expenses
increased
primarily
due
to
the
acquisitions
consummated
since
the
comparable
period
in
2013,
as
mentioned
above.
The
acquisitions
also
resulted
in
an
increase
in
depreciation
and
amortization
of
24.0%,
or
$13,383,
to
$69,167
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
from
$55,784
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Real
estate
and
personal
property
tax
and
property
insurance
increased
$6,259,
or
26.0%,
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2013
due
to
our
acquisitions
17
annual report 2014
along
with
a
general
overall
increase
in
tax
assessments
and
tax
rates
as
the
economy
improves,
but
was
partially
offset
by
reductions
resulting
from
our
rigorous
management
of
this
expense.
General
and
administrative
expense
decreased
by
approximately
$3,506
from
$23,869
in
2013
to
$20,363
in
2014.
General
and
administrative
expense
includes
expense
related
to
non-‐cash
share
based
payments
issued
as
incentive
compensation
to
the
Company’s
trustees,
executives,
and
employees.
Expense
related
to
share
based
compensation
decreased
$3,718
when
comparing
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
to
the
same
period
in
2013.
This
decrease
in
share
based
compensation
expense
is
due
primarily
to
the
vesting
of
the
2010
Multi-‐Year
LTIP
Plan
as
of
December
31,
2013
as
well
as
a
lesser
amount
of
restricted
shares
issued
since
December
31,
2013.
Please
refer
to
“Note
8
–
Share
Based
Payments”
of
the
notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements
for
more
information
about
our
stock
based
compensation.
Amounts
recorded
on
our
consolidated
statement
of
operations
for
acquisition
and
terminated
transactions
costs
will
fluctuate
from
period
to
period
based
on
our
acquisition
activities.
Acquisition
costs
typically
consist
of
transfer
taxes,
legal
fees
and
other
costs
associated
with
acquiring
a
hotel
property
and
transactions
that
were
terminated
during
the
year.
Acquisition
and
terminated
transaction
costs
increased
$1,498
from
$974
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
to
$2,472
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
While
we
acquired
more
properties
in
2013,
the
manner
in
which
acquisition
targets
are
found
can
and
do
dictate
the
costs
necessary
to
complete
the
acquisition.
The
costs
incurred
in
2014
were
related
to
the
following
hotels:
$1,836
related
to
our
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street
acquisition,
$173
related
to
our
Hotel
Milo
acquisition,
and
$169
related
to
our
Parrot
Key
Resort
acquisition.
The
costs
incurred
in
2013
were
related
to
the
following
hotels:
$500
related
to
our
Hyatt
Union
Square
acquisition;
$152
related
to
our
Residence
Inn
Coconut
Grove
acquisition;
$65
related
to
our
Courtyard
San
Diego
acquisition;
and
$138
for
our
Winter
Haven
and
Blue
Moon
Hotel
acquisitions.
Also
included
in
these
costs
are
charges
related
to
transactions
that
were
terminated
during
the
year.
Operating
Income
Operating
income
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$67,909
compared
to
operating
income
of
$44,690
during
the
same
period
in
2013.
Operating
income
was
positively
impacted
by
the
improved
operating
results
of
our
hotels
discussed
above
as
well
as
insurance
recoveries
of
$4,604,
much
of
which
represents
settlement
of
business
interruption
insurance
claims
that
arose
from
the
Hurricane
Sandy
natural
disaster
in
2012.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense
increased
$2,422
from
$40,935
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
to
$43,357
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
The
increase
in
interest
expense
is
primarily
due
to
increased
borrowings
drawn
on
our
unsecured
credit
facilities.
During
2014,
we
entered
into
a
new
credit
facility
which
allowed
for
an
additional
$100,000
in
unsecured
term
loan,
which
we
drew
during
the
second
quarter
of
2014.
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
recorded
a
gain
of
$7,195
related
to
its
sale
of
Hotel
373
in
Manhattan.
Gain
on
Hotel
Acquisitions,
net
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
recorded
a
net
gain
of
$12,667
related
primarily
to
its
purchase
of
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn
on
52nd
Street
in
Manhattan
as
the
purchase
price
of
the
asset
was
less
than
the
appraised
fair
value
as
of
the
closing
date.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
the
company
had
recorded
a
similar
net
gain
of
$12,096
related
to
its
purchase
of
Hyatt
Union
Square.
18
hersha hospitality trust
Development
Loan
Recovery
Consideration
given
in
exchange
for
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street
included
cash
to
the
seller
and
our
reinstatement
and
cancellation
of
a
development
loan
receivable
in
the
original
principal
amount
of
$10,000
and
$12,494
of
accrued
interest
and
late
fees.
This
development
loan
receivable
had
previously
been
fully
impaired
in
2009,
but
was
recovered
as
part
of
this
acquisition.
As
a
result,
we
recognized
a
gain
of
$22,494
on
the
recovery
of
the
previously
impaired
development
loan.
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
The
loss
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
consists
of
our
interest
in
the
operating
results
of
the
properties
we
own
in
joint
ventures.
The
operating
results
of
the
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
improved
by
$715
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
This
is
primarily
because
of
the
improved
performance
in
our
Boston
market,
where
two
of
our
five
properties
owned
in
joint
ventures
are
located.
We
recorded
an
impairment
loss
of
$1,813
related
to
the
Courtyard,
Norwich,
CT,
one
of
the
properties
owned
by
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
At
that
time,
we
did
not
anticipate
recovering
our
investment
balance
in
this
asset,
and
as
such
we
reduced
our
investment
attributed
to
this
property
to
$0
as
of
December
31,
2013.
During
the
third
quarter
of
2014,
the
title
on
this
property
was
transferred
to
the
lender.
Income
Tax
Benefit
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
recorded
an
income
tax
benefit
of
$2,685
compared
to
an
income
tax
benefit
of
$5,600
in
2013.
Prior
year
income
tax
benefit
included
the
reversal
of
allowances
against
state
deferred
tax
assets
resulting
from
cumulative
net
operating
losses
that
were
deemed
to
be
realizable
based
on
projections
of
future
performance
of
the
hotels
generating
these
net
operating
losses.
Discontinued
Operations
On
September
20,
2013,
the
Company
entered
into
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
to
sell
a
portfolio
of
16
non-‐core
hotels
for
an
aggregate
purchase
price
of
approximately
$217,000.
During
the
third
quarter
of
2013,
the
Company
had
recorded
an
impairment
of
$6,591
in
connection
with
the
anticipated
disposition.
As
of
December
31,
2013,
the
Company
had
closed
on
the
sale
of
12
of
the
hotels,
with
the
remaining
four
hotels
closing
during
the
first
quarter
of
2014.
Accordingly,
a
gain
of
$31,559
was
recognized
during
the
fourth
quarter
of
2013
as
the
proceeds
from
the
sale
exceeded
the
carrying
value.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
recorded
a
loss
of
$128
in
connection
with
the
closing
of
the
remaining
4
properties.
In
addition,
we
recorded
an
impairment
loss
of
$1,800
in
the
first
quarter
of
2014,
as
the
proceeds
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value
for
certain
of
these
properties.
On
June
12,
2013,
we
closed
on
the
sale
of
our
Comfort
Inn,
Harrisburg,
PA.
The
Company
sold
the
hotel
for
$3,700
and
recorded
a
gain
on
sale
of
$442.
Additionally,
on
September
17,
2013,
we
closed
on
the
sale
of
Holiday
Inn
Express
Camp
Springs,
MD
property.
The
Company
sold
the
hotel
for
$8,500
and
recorded
a
gain
on
the
sale
of
$120
and
an
impairment
charge
of
$3,723
during
the
second
quarter
of
2013
as
the
anticipated
net
proceeds
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
The
operating
results
for
all
18
of
the
above
described
hotel
properties
and
one
land
parcel
have
been
reclassified
to
discontinued
operations
in
the
statement
of
operations
for
the
years
end
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
respectively.
19
annual report 2014
We
recorded
income
from
discontinued
operations
of
approximately
$263
during
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
compared
to
income
of
approximately
$7,388
during
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2013.
See
“Note
12
–
Discontinued
Operations”
for
more
information.
Effective
January
1,
2014,
we
early
adopted
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08
concerning
the
classification
and
reporting
of
discontinued
operations.
This
amendment
defines
discontinued
operations
as
a
component
of
an
entity
that
represents
a
strategic
shift
that
has
(or
will
have)
a
major
effect
on
an
entity’s
operations
and
financial
results.
As
a
result
of
the
early
adoption
of
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08,
we
anticipate
that
most
of
our
hotel
dispositions
will
not
be
classified
as
discontinued
operations
as
most
will
not
fit
this
definition.
Net
Income
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$52,899
compared
to
net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
of
$32,752
for
the
same
period
in
2013.
Net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
positively
impacted
by
the
improved
operating
results
of
our
hotels
and
one-‐time
gains
discussed
above.
Net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
negatively
impacted
by
the
extinguishment
of
$2,250
of
issuance
costs
associated
with
the
redemption
of
all
of
our
outstanding
Series
A
Preferred
Shares.
Comprehensive
Income
Attributable
to
Common
Shareholders
Comprehensive
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$52,917
compared
to
$34,162
for
the
same
period
in
2013.
This
amount
was
primarily
attributable
to
net
income
as
more
fully
described
above.
Further
change
in
other
comprehensive
income
was
primarily
the
result
of
the
positive
shift
in
the
position
of
the
fair
value
of
our
derivative
instruments.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
recorded
other
comprehensive
income
of
$68,289
when
compared
to
$51,358
of
other
comprehensive
income
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
The
expected
rise
in
the
interest
rate
yield
curve
in
the
next
few
years
has
continued
to
increase
the
fair
value
of
our
interest
rate
swaps,
increasing
the
asset
value
of
certain
derivative
instruments
and
decreasing
the
liability
of
shifting
the
liability
to
an
asset
position
for
other
derivative
instruments.
COMPARISON
OF
THE
YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER
31,
2013
TO
DECEMBER
31,
2012
(dollars
in
thousands,
except
per
share
data)
Revenue
Our
total
revenues
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2013
and
2012
consisted
of
hotel
operating
revenues,
interest
income
from
our
development
loan
program
and
other
revenue.
Hotel
operating
revenues
were
approximately
99.9%
and
99.3%
of
total
revenues
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2013
and
2012,
respectively.
Hotel
operating
revenues
are
recorded
for
wholly
owned
hotels
that
are
leased
to
our
wholly
owned
TRS
and
hotels
owned
through
joint
venture
interests
that
were
consolidated
in
our
financial
statements
during
the
period.
Hotel
operating
revenues
increased
$39,059,
or
13.1%,
from
$299,005
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
$338,064
for
the
same
period
in
2013.
This
increase
in
hotel
operating
revenues
was
primarily
attributable
to
the
acquisitions
consummated
in
2013
and
2012
as
well
as
increases
in
hotel
operating
revenues
for
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels.
20
hersha hospitality trust
We
acquired
interests
in
the
following
consolidated
hotels
that
contributed
the
following
operating
revenues
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013:
Brand
Location
Hyatt
Union
Square
Courtyard
by
Marriott
New
York,
NY
San
Diego,
CA
Acquisition
Date
April
9,
2013
May
30,
2013
Residence
Inn
Winter
Haven
Blue
Moon
Coconut
Grove,
FL
June
12,
2013
Miami,
FL
Miami,
FL
December
20,
2013
December
20,
2013
Rooms
2013
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
178
$
245
140
70
75
708
$
11,272
8,350
2,889
203
175
22,889
Revenues
for
all
hotels
were
recorded
from
the
date
of
acquisition
as
hotel
operating
revenues.
Further,
hotel
operating
revenues
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
included
revenues
for
the
following
hotels
that
were
purchased
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
Hotels
acquired
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
would
have
a
full
year
of
results
included
in
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
but
not
necessarily
a
full
year
of
results
during
the
same
period
in
2012.
We
acquired
interests
in
the
following
consolidated
hotels
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012:
Brand
Location
Acquisition
Date
Rooms
2013
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
2012
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
Rittenhouse
Hotel
Philadelphia,
PA
March
1,
2012
116
$
16,969
$
The
Boxer
Boston,
MA
May
7,
2012
Holiday
Inn
Express
New
York,
NY
June
18,
2012
80
228
3,799
16,746
424
$
37,514
$
16,809
2,791
10,170
29,770
In
addition,
our
same
store
consolidated
portfolio
experienced
improvements
in
ADR
and
occupancy
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2012.
Occupancy
in
our
same
store
consolidated
hotels
increased
190
basis
points
from
78.6%
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
80.5%
for
the
same
period
in
2013.
ADR
improved
1.1%,
increasing
from
$172.67
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
$174.65
during
the
same
period
in
2013.
These
improvements
were
due
to
improvements
in
lodging
trends
in
the
markets
in
which
our
hotels
are
located.
We
had
previously
invested
in
hotel
development
projects
by
providing
mortgage
or
mezzanine
financing
to
hotel
developers
and
through
the
acquisition
of
land
that
is
then
leased
to
hotel
developers.
Interest
income
from
development
loans
receivable
was
$158
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
compared
to
$1,998
for
the
same
period
in
2012.
In
April
2013,
we
acquired
the
Hyatt
Union
Square
and
as
part
of
the
consideration
we
agreed
to
cancel
the
$13,303
development
loan
receivable
in
its
entirety.
Furthermore,
the
only
remaining
development
loan,
related
to
the
Hyatt
48Lex,
was
paid
off
in
full
during
April
2013.
As
of
December
31,
2013,
we
had
no
outstanding
development
loans
receivable.
Expenses
Total
hotel
operating
expenses
increased
16.3%
to
approximately
$188,431
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
from
$161,982
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
Consistent
with
the
increase
in
hotel
operating
revenues,
hotel
operating
expenses
increased
primarily
due
to
the
acquisitions
consummated
since
the
comparable
period
in
2012,
as
mentioned
above.
The
acquisitions
also
resulted
in
an
increase
in
depreciation
and
21
annual report 2014
amortization
of
15.6%,
or
$7,541,
to
$55,784
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
from
$48,243
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
Real
estate
and
personal
property
tax
and
property
insurance
increased
$4,742,
or
24.5%,
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2012
due
to
our
acquisitions
along
with
a
general
overall
increase
in
tax
assessments
and
tax
rates
as
the
economy
improves.
General
and
administrative
expense
increased
by
approximately
$492
from
$23,377
in
2012
to
$23,869
in
2013.
Increases
in
other
general
and
administrative
expenses
were
primarily
from
increases
in
employee
headcount
and
resulting
base
compensation
and
payroll
taxes
increases.
General
and
administrative
expense
includes
expense
related
to
non-‐cash
share
based
payments
issued
as
incentive
compensation
to
the
Company’s
trustees,
executives,
and
employees.
Expense
related
to
share
based
compensation
increased
$68
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
when
compared
to
the
same
period
of
2012.
Please
refer
to
“Note
8
–
Share
Based
Payments”
of
the
notes
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements
for
more
information
about
our
stock
based
compensation.
Amounts
recorded
on
our
consolidated
statement
of
operations
for
acquisition
and
terminated
transactions
costs
will
fluctuate
from
period
to
period
based
on
our
acquisition
activities.
Acquisition
costs
typically
consist
of
transfer
taxes,
legal
fees
and
other
costs
associated
with
acquiring
a
hotel
property
and
transactions
that
were
terminated
during
the
year.
Acquisition
and
terminated
transaction
costs
decreased
$205
from
$1,179
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
$974
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
While
we
acquired
more
properties
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2012,
the
manner
in
which
acquisition
targets
are
found
can
and
do
dictate
the
costs
necessary
to
complete
the
acquisition.
The
costs
incurred
in
2013
were
related
to
the
following
hotels:
$500
related
to
our
Hyatt
Union
Square
acquisition;
$152
related
to
our
Residence
Inn
Coconut
Grove
acquisition;
$65
related
to
our
Courtyard
San
Diego
acquisition;
and
$138
for
our
Winter
Haven
and
Blue
Moon
Hotel
acquisitions.
The
costs
incurred
in
2012
were
related
to
following
hotels:
$963
related
to
our
acquisition
of
The
Rittenhouse
Hotel;
$61
related
to
acquisition
of
The
Boxer;
$67
related
to
our
acquisition
of
Holiday
Inn
Express
Manhattan.
The
remaining
costs
were
primarily
related
to
transactions
that
were
terminated
during
the
year.
Operating
Income
Operating
income
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
$44,690
compared
to
operating
income
of
$46,258
during
the
same
period
in
2012.
As
noted
above,
the
decrease
in
operating
income
resulted
partially
from
improved
performance
of
our
portfolio
and
acquisitions
that
have
occurred
since
the
beginning
of
2012,
but
is
offset
by
increases
in
real
estate
taxes.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense
increased
$2,865
from
$38,070
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
$40,935
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
The
increase
in
interest
expense
is
due
primarily
to
an
increase
in
borrowings
drawn
on
our
senior
unsecured
term
loan
and
our
line
of
credit
throughout
the
year.
A
portion
of
these
borrowings
were
used
to
repay
various
mortgage
loans,
which
lowered
our
overall
consolidated
secured
mortgage
indebtedness
outstanding.
Additionally,
we
used
proceeds
from
the
line
of
credit
to
fund
the
purchase
of
our
Residence
Inn
Coconut
Grove
and
Courtyard
San
Diego
acquisitions.
Finally,
we
financed
a
portion
of
our
Hyatt
Union
Square
acquisition
with
variable
rate
mortgage
debt
and
borrowed
an
additional
$10,000
to
fund
construction
of
the
tower
at
our
Courtyard
Miami
Beach
hotel.
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
The
loss
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
consists
of
our
interest
in
the
operating
results
of
the
properties
we
own
in
joint
ventures.
The
operating
results
of
the
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
improved
by
$210
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Since
the
beginning
of
2012,
we
have
made
efforts
to
decrease
our
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
resulting
in
the
sale
of
5
of
these
assets
to
third
parties
and
the
purchase
of
the
remaining
50%
interest
in
22
hersha hospitality trust
our
Holiday
Inn
Express,
New
York,
NY
hotel
on
June
18,
2012.
Accordingly,
the
results
of
this
hotel
are
now
included
in
our
consolidated
results
and
our
interest
in
Metro
29th
was
remeasured.
As
a
result,
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012,
we
recorded
a
loss
from
the
remeasurement
of
our
investments
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture
of
approximately
$224.
On
August
13,
2012,
the
Company
purchased
the
remaining
50%
ownership
interest
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing,
the
lessee
of
the
Courtyard
by
Marriot,
Ewing,
NJ.
As
such,
we
ceased
to
account
for
our
investment
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing
under
the
equity
method
of
accounting
as
of
August
10,
2012
because
it
became
a
consolidated
subsidiary.
Our
interest
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing,
which
consisted
of
our
investment
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing
and
a
receivable,
was
remeasured
and
as
a
result
based
on
the
appraised
value
of
the
hotel,
we
recorded
a
loss
from
the
remeasurement
of
our
investments
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture
of
approximately
$1,668
during
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2012.
We
recorded
an
impairment
loss
of
$1,813
related
to
the
Courtyard,
Norwich,
CT,
one
of
the
properties
owned
by
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
At
that
time,
we
did
not
anticipate
recovering
our
investment
balance
in
this
asset,
and
as
such
we
reduced
our
investment
attributed
to
this
property
to
$0
as
of
December
31,
2013.
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
transferred
title
to
the
property
to
the
lender
in
the
third
quarter
of
2014.
Income
Tax
Benefit
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
the
Company
recorded
an
income
tax
benefit
of
$5,600
compared
an
income
tax
benefit
of
$3,355
in
2012.
Excluded
from
the
income
tax
benefit
for
2013
is
$190
of
income
tax
expense
related
to
discontinued
operations.
Approximately
$2,866
of
the
income
tax
benefit
relates
to
deferred
tax
assets
that
the
Company
now
believes
are
realizable
and
variances
between
the
tax
return
and
year
end
provision
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
The
remaining
income
tax
benefit
is
a
result
of
the
operations
of
the
Company’s
taxable
REIT
subsidiary,
44
New
England.
Discontinued
Operations
On
September
20,
2013,
the
Company
entered
into
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
to
sell
a
portfolio
of
16
non-‐core
hotels
for
an
aggregate
purchase
price
of
approximately
$217,000.
During
the
third
quarter
of
2013,
the
Company
had
recorded
an
impairment
of
$6,591
in
connection
with
the
anticipated
disposition.
As
of
December
31,
2013,
the
Company
had
closed
on
the
sale
of
12
of
the
hotels.
Accordingly,
a
gain
of
$31,559
was
recognized
during
the
fourth
quarter
of
2013
as
the
proceeds
from
the
sale
exceeded
the
carrying
value.
The
Company
closed
on
the
remaining
four
non-‐core
hotels
during
the
first
quarter
of
2014.
On
June
12,
2013,
we
closed
on
the
sale
of
our
Comfort
Inn,
Harrisburg,
PA.
The
Company
sold
the
hotel
for
$3,700
and
recorded
a
gain
on
sale
of
$442.
Additionally,
on
September
17,
2013,
we
closed
on
the
sale
of
Holiday
Inn
Express
Camp
Springs,
MD
property.
The
Company
sold
the
hotel
for
$8,500
and
recorded
a
gain
on
the
sale
of
$120
and
an
impairment
charge
of
$3,723
during
the
second
quarter
of
2013
as
the
anticipated
net
proceeds
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012,
the
Company
closed
on
the
sale
of
18
non-‐core
hotel
properties,
transferred
the
title
of
the
Comfort
Inn
North
Dartmouth,
MA
to
the
lender
and
closed
on
the
sale
of
the
land
parcel
and
improvements
located
at
585
Eighth
Avenue,
New
York,
NY.
As
a
result
of
these
transactions,
we
recognized
a
gain
of
approximately
$11,231
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
The
operating
results
for
all
37
of
the
above
described
hotel
properties
and
one
land
parcel
have
been
reclassified
to
discontinued
operations
in
the
statement
of
operations
for
the
years
end
December
31,
2013
and
2012,
respectively.
23
annual report 2014
We
recorded
income
from
discontinued
operations
of
approximately
$7,388
during
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2013,
compared
to
income
of
approximately
$3,489
during
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2012.
See
“Note
11
–
Discontinued
Operations”
for
more
information.
Net
Income
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
$32,752
compared
to
net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
of
$8,376
for
the
same
period
in
2012.
As
previously
discussed,
net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
positively
impacted
by
a
net
gain
of
approximately
$12,096
on
the
purchase
of
the
Hyatt
Union
Square,
New
York,
NY,
as
the
fair
value
of
the
assets
acquired
less
any
liabilities
assumed
exceeded
the
consideration
transferred.
Additionally,
the
$31,559
gain
on
the
sale
of
12
of
the
16
non-‐core
hotels
that
closed
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
positively
impacted
net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders.
Comprehensive
Income
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Comprehensive
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
$34,162
compared
to
$7,741
for
the
same
period
in
2012.
This
amount
was
primarily
attributable
to
net
income/loss
as
more
fully
described
above.
Further
change
in
other
comprehensive
income
was
primarily
the
result
of
the
positive
shift
in
the
position
of
the
fair
value
of
our
derivative
instruments.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
we
recorded
other
comprehensive
income
of
$1,410
when
compared
to
$635
of
other
comprehensive
loss
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
During
the
year,
a
projected
rise
in
the
interest
rate
yield
curve
had
favorably
shifted
many
of
our
interest
rate
swaps
from
a
liability
to
an
asset
position.
LIQUIDITY,
CAPITAL
RESOURCES,
AND
EQUITY
OFFERINGS
(dollars
in
thousands,
except
per
share
data)
Potential
Sources
of
Capital
Our
organizational
documents
do
not
limit
the
amount
of
indebtedness
that
we
may
incur.
Our
ability
to
incur
additional
debt
is
dependent
upon
a
number
of
factors,
including
the
current
state
of
the
overall
credit
markets,
our
degree
of
leverage
and
borrowing
restrictions
imposed
by
existing
lenders.
Our
ability
to
raise
funds
through
the
issuance
of
debt
and
equity
securities
is
dependent
upon,
among
other
things,
capital
market
volatility,
risk
tolerance
of
investors,
general
market
conditions
for
REITs
and
market
perceptions
related
to
the
Company’s
ability
to
generate
cash
flow
and
positive
returns
on
its
investments.
In
addition,
our
mortgage
indebtedness
contains
various
financial
and
non-‐financial
covenants
customarily
found
in
secured,
nonrecourse
financing
arrangements.
If
the
specified
criteria
are
not
satisfied,
the
lender
may
be
able
to
escrow
cash
flow
generated
by
the
property
securing
the
applicable
mortgage
loan.
We
have
determined
that
certain
debt
service
coverage
ratio
covenants
contained
in
the
loan
agreements
securing
a
number
of
our
hotel
properties
were
not
met
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Pursuant
to
the
loan
agreements,
certain
lenders
have
elected
to
escrow
the
operating
cash
flow
for
these
properties.
However,
these
covenants
do
not
constitute
an
event
of
default
for
these
loans.
Future
deterioration
in
market
conditions
could
cause
restrictions
in
our
access
to
the
cash
flow
of
additional
properties.
On
February
28,
2014,
we
entered
into
a
senior
unsecured
credit
agreement
with
Citigroup
Global
Markets
Inc.
and
various
other
lenders.
The
credit
agreement
provides
for
a
$500,000
senior
unsecured
credit
facility
consisting
of
a
$250,000
senior
unsecured
revolving
line
of
credit
and
a
$250,000
senior
unsecured
term
loan.
This
new
facility
amended
and
restated
the
existing
$400,000
senior
secured
credit
facility.
The
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
expires
on
February
28,
2018
and,
provided
no
event
of
default
has
occurred,
we
may
request
that
the
lenders
renew
the
credit
facility
for
an
additional
one-‐year
period.
The
credit
facility
is
also
expandable
to
$850,000
at
our
request,
subject
to
the
satisfaction
of
certain
conditions.
24
hersha hospitality trust
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
outstanding
unsecured
term
loan
balance
under
the
$500,000
senior
unsecured
credit
facility
was
$250,000
and
therefore
fully
drawn,
and
we
had
no
outstanding
borrowings
under
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
our
remaining
borrowing
capacity
under
the
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility’s
revolving
line
of
credit
was
$245,745,
which
is
based
on
certain
operating
metrics
of
unencumbered
hotel
properties
designated
as
borrowing
base
assets.
We
intend
to
repay
indebtedness
incurred
under
the
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
from
time
to
time,
for
acquisitions
or
otherwise,
out
of
cash
flow
and
from
the
proceeds
of
issuances
of
additional
common
and
preferred
shares
and
potentially
other
securities.
We
will
continue
to
monitor
our
debt
maturities
to
manage
our
liquidity
needs.
However,
no
assurances
can
be
given
that
we
will
be
successful
in
refinancing
all
or
a
portion
of
our
future
debt
obligations
due
to
factors
beyond
our
control
or
that,
if
refinanced,
the
terms
of
such
debt
will
not
vary
from
the
existing
terms.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
have
$69,063
of
indebtedness
maturing
on
or
before
December
31,
2015.
We
currently
expect
that
cash
requirements
for
all
debt
that
is
not
refinanced
by
our
existing
lenders
for
which
the
maturity
date
is
not
extended
will
be
met
through
a
combination
of
cash
on
hand,
refinancing
the
existing
debt
with
new
lenders,
draws
on
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
$500,000
credit
facility
and
the
issuance
of
our
securities.
On
February
25,
2013,
we
completed
a
public
offering
of
3,000,000
6.875%
Series
C
preferred
shares.
These
shares
have
a
par
value
of
$0.01
per
share
with
a
$25.00
liquidation
preference
per
share.
Net
proceeds
of
the
offering,
after
deducting
underwriting
discounts
and
offering
expenses,
were
approximately
$72,370.
We
utilized
the
net
proceeds
of
the
offering
to
redeem
all
outstanding
8.00%
Series
A
preferred
shares
on
March
28,
2013,
and
for
general
corporate
purposes.
The
Series
A
preferred
shares
were
redeemed
at
a
per
share
redemption
price
of
$25.00
together
with
accrued
and
unpaid
dividends
to
the
redemption
date
for
an
aggregate
per
share
redemption
price
of
$25.4056.
Dividends
ceased
accruing
on
the
Series
A
preferred
shares
on
March
28,
2013.
Common
Share
Repurchase
Plan
In
December
2012,
our
Board
of
Trustees
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$75,000
of
our
outstanding
common
shares
through
December
31,
2013.
We
did
not
repurchase
any
common
shares
prior
to
the
expiration
of
the
share
repurchase
program.
In
January
2014,
our
Board
of
Trustees
again
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$75,000
of
our
outstanding
common
shares.
In
February
2015,
our
Board
of
Trustees
again
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$100,000
of
our
outstanding
common
shares.
The
current
share
repurchase
program
will
expire
on
December
31,
2015.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
repurchased
2,626,854
common
shares
for
an
aggregate
purchase
price
of
$15,418.
As
of
February
20,
2015,
we
have
not
repurchased
any
common
shares
pursuant
to
the
newly
reauthorized
share
repurchase
program.
Upon
repurchase
by
the
Company,
these
common
shares
ceased
to
be
outstanding
and
became
authorized
but
unissued
commons
shares.
Development
Loans
Receivable
During
April
2013,
we
acquired
the
Hyatt
Union
Square,
and
as
part
of
the
consideration
we
agreed
to
cancel
the
$13,303
development
loan
receivable
in
its
entirety.
Furthermore,
the
development
loan
related
to
the
Hyatt
48Lex
was
paid
in
full
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
had
no
outstanding
development
loans
receivable.
25
annual report 2014
Acquisitions
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
acquired
the
following
wholly-‐owned
hotel
properties:
Hotel
Acquisition
Date
Land
Buildings
and
Improvements
Furniture
Fixtures
and
Equipment
Ground
Lease
Intangible
Franchise
Fees
and
Loan
Costs
Total
Purchase
Price
Assumption
of
Debt
Hotel
Milo,
Santa
Barbara,
CA
Parrot
Key
Resort,
Key
West,
FL
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
2/28/2014
$
-‐
$
55,080
$
805
$
(14,230)
$
273
$
41,928
$
24,924
5/7/2014
57,889
33,959
8,152
-‐
-‐
100,000
-
5/27/2014
45,480
60,762
4,920
-‐
1,123
112,285
-‐
TOTAL
$
103,369
$
149,801
$
13,877
$
(14,230)
$
1,396
$
254,213
$
24,924
We
intend
to
invest
in
additional
hotels
only
as
suitable
opportunities
arise
and
adequate
sources
of
financing
are
available.
We
expect
that
future
investments
in
hotels
will
depend
on
and
will
be
financed
by,
in
whole
or
in
part,
our
existing
cash,
the
proceeds
from
additional
issuances
of
common
or
preferred
shares,
proceeds
from
the
sale
of
assets,
issuances
of
Common
Units,
issuances
of
preferred
units
or
other
securities
or
borrowings.
Operating
Liquidity
and
Capital
Expenditures
We
expect
to
meet
our
short-‐term
liquidity
requirements
generally
through
net
cash
provided
by
operations,
existing
cash
balances
and,
if
necessary,
short-‐term
borrowings
under
the
$250,000
unsecured
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility.
We
believe
that
the
net
cash
provided
by
operations
in
the
coming
year
and
borrowings
drawn
on
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
will
be
adequate
to
fund
the
Company’s
operating
requirements,
monthly
recurring
debt
service
and
the
payment
of
dividends
in
accordance
with
REIT
requirements
of
the
Code,
as
amended.
To
qualify
as
a
REIT,
we
must
distribute
annually
at
least
90%
of
our
taxable
income.
This
distribution
requirement
limits
our
ability
to
retain
earnings
and
requires
us
to
raise
additional
capital
in
order
to
grow
our
business
and
acquire
additional
hotel
properties.
However,
there
is
no
assurance
that
we
will
be
able
to
borrow
funds
or
raise
additional
equity
capital
on
terms
acceptable
to
us,
if
at
all.
In
addition,
we
cannot
guarantee
that
we
will
continue
to
make
distributions
to
our
shareholders
at
the
current
rate
or
at
all.
Due
to
the
seasonality
of
our
business,
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
fluctuates
significantly
from
quarter
to
quarter.
However,
we
believe
that,
based
on
our
current
estimates,
which
include
the
addition
of
cash
provided
by
hotels
acquired
during
2014,
our
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
will
be
sufficient
over
the
next
12
months
to
fund
the
payment
of
our
dividend
at
its
current
level.
However,
our
Board
of
Trustees
continues
to
evaluate
the
dividend
policy
in
the
context
of
our
overall
liquidity
and
market
conditions
and
may
elect
to
reduce
or
suspend
these
distributions.
Net
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$112,894
and
cash
used
for
the
payment
of
distributions
and
dividends
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$66,366.
We
also
project
that
our
operating
cash
flow
and
available
borrowings
under
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
will
be
sufficient
to
satisfy
our
liquidity
and
other
capital
needs
over
the
next
twelve
to
eighteen
months.
Our
long-‐term
liquidity
requirements
consist
primarily
of
the
costs
of
acquiring
additional
hotel
properties,
renovation
and
other
non-‐recurring
capital
expenditures
that
need
to
be
made
periodically
with
respect
to
hotel
properties
and
scheduled
debt
repayments.
We
will
seek
to
satisfy
these
long-‐term
liquidity
requirements
through
26
hersha hospitality trust
various
sources
of
capital,
including
borrowings
under
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
and
through
secured,
non-‐recourse
mortgage
financings
with
respect
to
our
unencumbered
hotel
properties.
In
addition,
we
may
seek
to
raise
capital
through
public
or
private
offerings
of
our
securities.
Certain
factors
may
have
a
material
adverse
effect
on
our
ability
to
access
these
capital
sources,
including
our
degree
of
leverage,
the
value
of
our
unencumbered
hotel
properties
and
borrowing
restrictions
imposed
by
lenders
or
franchisors.
We
will
continue
to
analyze
which
source
of
capital
is
most
advantageous
to
us
at
any
particular
point
in
time,
but
financing
may
not
be
consistently
available
to
us
on
terms
that
are
attractive,
or
at
all.
Spending
on
capital
improvements
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
decreased
when
compared
to
spending
on
capital
improvements
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
spent
$38,342
on
capital
expenditures
to
renovate,
improve
or
replace
assets
at
our
hotels.
This
compares
to
$42,854
during
the
same
period
in
2013.
These
capital
expenditures
were
undertaken
to
comply
with
brand
mandated
improvements
and
to
initiate
projects
that
we
believe
will
generate
a
return
on
investment
to
take
advantage
of
the
continuing
recovery
in
the
lodging
sector.
In
addition
to
capital
reserves
required
under
certain
loan
agreements
and
capital
expenditures
to
renovate,
improve
or
replace
assets
at
our
hotels,
we
have
opportunistically
engaged
in
hotel
development
projects.
During
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
spent
$16,290
less
on
hotel
development
projects
than
during
the
same
period
of
2013
as
both
the
new
tower
construction
at
Courtyard
Miami
Beach
and
re-‐development
project
at
Hampton
Inn
Pearl
Street
hotels
neared
completion.
Projects
such
as
these
require
significant
capital,
which
we
expect
to
fund
with
various
sources
of
capital,
including
available
borrowings
under
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
credit
facility
and
through
secured,
non-‐recourse
mortgage
financings.
In
addition,
we
may
seek
to
raise
capital
through
public
or
private
offerings
of
our
securities
to
fund
these
capital
improvements.
We
may
spend
additional
amounts,
if
necessary,
to
comply
with
the
reasonable
requirements
of
any
franchise
license
under
which
any
of
our
hotels
operate
and
otherwise
to
the
extent
we
deem
such
expenditures
to
be
in
our
best
interests.
We
are
also
obligated
to
fund
the
cost
of
certain
capital
improvements
to
our
hotels.
We
expect
to
use
operating
cash
flow,
borrowings
under
the
$250,000
revolving
line
of
credit
portion
of
our
credit
facility,
and
proceeds
from
issuances
of
our
securities
to
pay
for
the
cost
of
capital
improvements
and
any
furniture,
fixture
and
equipment
requirements
in
excess
of
the
set
aside
referenced
above.
CASH
FLOW
ANALYSIS
(dollars
in
thousands,
except
per
share
data)
Comparison
of
the
Years
Ended
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
Net
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
increased
$22,633
from
$90,261
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
to
$112,894
for
the
comparable
period
in
2014.
Net
income,
adjusted
for
non-‐cash
items
reflected
in
the
statement
of
cash
flows
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
increased
$17,698
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
when
compared
to
2013.
This
is
primarily
due
to
cash
provided
by
properties
acquired
over
the
past
twelve
months
and
improving
operating
results
within
our
existing
portfolio.
The
offsetting
decrease
in
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
was
attributable
to
an
increase
in
working
capital
assets.
Net
cash
used
in
investing
activities
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
increased
$55,030
from
$125,474
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
compared
to
$180,504
for
2014.
While
spending
on
the
purchase
of
hotel
properties
and
deposits
on
hotel
acquisitions
was
$43,742
higher
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
compared
to
same
period
in
2014,
proceeds
from
the
disposition
of
hotel
properties
was
$105,959
less
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
when
compared
to
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Offsetting
this
was
spending
on
hotel
development
projects
which
was
$16,290
less
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
when
compared
to
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
and
a
repayment
of
note
receivable
of
$15,122
which
occurred
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
we
received
27
annual report 2014
$30,056
in
proceeds
from
the
disposition
of
Hotel
373
in
the
second
quarter
and
the
remaining
4
non-‐core
properties
during
the
first
quarter.
Net
cash
provided
by
financing
activities
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
was
$53,072
compared
to
net
cash
provided
by
financing
activities
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
of
$2,367.
Net
proceeds
received
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
under
our
unsecured
credit
facility
were
$50,000
higher
than
during
the
same
period
in
2013.
Net
proceeds
from
mortgages
and
notes
payable
were
$29,050
higher
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
when
compared
to
the
same
period
in
2013.
During
the
first
quarter
of
2013,
we
completed
an
offering
of
Series
C
Preferred
Shares
with
net
proceeds
of
$72,370,
after
deducting
underwriting
discounts
and
offering
expenses,
which
was
primarily
used
to
redeem
all
of
the
issued
and
outstanding
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
with
a
redemption
value
of
$60,000.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
used
$15,418
for
the
repurchase
of
common
shares.
Dividends
and
distributions
payable
decreased
$391
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
compared
to
2013,
due
to
a
decrease
in
the
number
of
outstanding
common
shares.
Comparison
of
the
Years
Ended
December
31,
2013
and
December
31,
2012
Net
cash
provided
by
operating
activities
increased
$18,505,
from
$71,756
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
$90,261
for
2013.
Net
income,
adjusted
for
non-‐cash
items
such
as
gain
on
acquisition
of
hotel
assets,
gain
on
disposition
of
hotel
properties,
impairment
of
assets,
benefit
for
income
taxes,
depreciation
and
amortization,
non-‐cash
debt
extinguishment,
development
loan
interest
income
added
to
principal,
interest
in
income/loss
from
and
distributions
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures,
loss
recognized
on
change
in
fair
value
of
derivative
instruments
and
stock
based
compensation
increased
$4,720
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
when
compared
to
2012.
This
is
primarily
due
to
cash
provided
by
properties
acquired
over
the
past
twelve
months
and
improving
operating
results
within
our
existing
portfolio.
In
addition
to
these
increases
in
cash
provided
by
these
operating
activities
was
an
increase
in
net
cash
used
in
funding
working
capital
assets,
such
as
payments
into
escrows,
and
repaying
working
capital
liabilities,
such
as
accounts
payable
and
accrued
expenses.
Net
cash
used
in
investing
activities
increased
$69,657,
from
$55,817
for
year
ended
December
31,
2012
to
$125,474
for
2013.
Spending
on
the
purchase
of
hotel
properties,
deposits
on
hotel
acquisitions
and
development
projects
was
$142,474
higher
during
2013
compared
to
2012.
Offsetting
this
increase
in
spending
on
the
purchase
of
new
hotels
was
in
increase
in
proceeds
from
the
disposition
of
hotel
properties,
which
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
$72,293
higher
than
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
Net
cash
provided
by
financing
activities
for
year
ended
December
31,
2013
was
$2,367
compared
to
$28,552
during
the
same
period
in
2012.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
we
received
proceeds
of
$72,370
from
the
issuance
of
our
series
C
preferred
shares
and
used
$60,000
of
these
proceeds
to
redeem
our
series
A
preferred
shares,
resulting
in
net
proceeds
of
$12,370.
During
the
same
period
in
2012
we
received
net
proceeds
of
$128,558
from
the
issuance
of
common
shares.
Dividends
and
distributions
payable
increased
$6,630
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
compared
to
2012,
due
to
an
increase
in
the
number
of
outstanding
common
shares
as
a
result
of
a
common
stock
offering
completed
in
May
2012,
and
the
additional
preferred
share
dividends
we
paid
due
to
the
timing
of
the
preferred
stock
offering
and
subsequent
redemption
which
occurred
in
March
2013.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
borrowings
under
our
unsecured
term
loan
and
mortgages
and
notes
payable,
net
of
repayments
provided
cash
of
$60,602,
compared
to
net
repayments
of
$39,783
for
the
same
period
in
2012.
OFF
BALANCE
SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
The
Company
does
not
have
off
balance
sheet
arrangements
that
have
or
are
reasonably
likely
to
have
a
current
or
future
effect
on
our
financial
condition,
revenues
or
expenses,
results
of
operations,
liquidity,
capital
expenditures
or
capital
resources.
28
hersha hospitality trust
FUNDS
FROM
OPERATIONS
(in
thousands,
except
share
data)
The
National
Association
of
Real
Estate
Investment
Trusts
(“NAREIT”)
developed
Funds
from
Operations
(“FFO”)
as
a
non-‐GAAP
financial
measure
of
performance
of
an
equity
REIT
in
order
to
recognize
that
income-‐producing
real
estate
historically
has
not
depreciated
on
the
basis
determined
under
GAAP.
We
calculate
FFO
applicable
to
common
shares
and
Common
Units
in
accordance
with
the
April
2002
National
Policy
Bulletin
of
NAREIT,
which
we
refer
to
as
the
White
Paper.
The
White
Paper
defines
FFO
as
net
income
(loss)
(computed
in
accordance
with
GAAP)
excluding
extraordinary
items
as
defined
under
GAAP
and
gains
or
losses
from
sales
of
previously
depreciated
assets,
gains
on
hotel
acquisitions,
plus
certain
non-‐cash
items,
such
as
loss
from
impairment
of
assets
and
depreciation
and
amortization,
and
after
adjustments
for
unconsolidated
partnerships
and
joint
ventures.
Our
interpretation
of
the
NAREIT
definition
is
that
noncontrolling
interest
in
net
income
(loss)
should
be
added
back
to
(deducted
from)
net
income
(loss)
as
part
of
reconciling
net
income
(loss)
to
FFO.
Our
FFO
computation
may
not
be
comparable
to
FFO
reported
by
other
REITs
that
do
not
compute
FFO
in
accordance
with
the
NAREIT
definition,
or
that
interpret
the
NAREIT
definition
differently
than
we
do.
The
GAAP
measure
that
we
believe
to
be
most
directly
comparable
to
FFO,
net
income
(loss)
applicable
to
common
shareholders,
includes
loss
from
the
impairment
of
certain
depreciable
assets,
our
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
and
land,
depreciation
and
amortization
expenses,
gains
or
losses
on
property
sales,
gains
on
hotel
acquisitions,
noncontrolling
interest
and
preferred
dividends.
In
computing
FFO,
we
eliminate
these
items
because,
in
our
view,
they
are
not
indicative
of
the
results
from
our
property
operations.
We
determined
that
the
loss
from
the
impairment
of
certain
depreciable
assets
including
investments
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
and
land,
was
driven
by
a
measurable
decrease
in
the
fair
value
of
certain
hotel
properties
and
other
assets
as
determined
by
our
analysis
of
those
assets
in
accordance
with
applicable
GAAP.
As
such,
these
impairments
have
been
eliminated
from
net
loss
to
determine
FFO.
FFO
does
not
represent
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
in
accordance
with
GAAP
and
should
not
be
considered
an
alternative
to
net
income
as
an
indication
of
the
Company’s
performance
or
to
cash
flow
as
a
measure
of
liquidity
or
ability
to
make
distributions.
We
consider
FFO
to
be
a
meaningful,
additional
measure
of
operating
performance
because
it
excludes
the
effects
of
the
assumption
that
the
value
of
real
estate
assets
diminishes
predictably
over
time,
and
because
it
is
widely
used
by
industry
analysts
as
a
performance
measure.
We
show
both
FFO
from
consolidated
hotel
operations
and
FFO
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
because
we
believe
it
is
meaningful
for
the
investor
to
understand
the
relative
contributions
from
our
consolidated
and
unconsolidated
hotels.
The
display
of
both
FFO
from
consolidated
hotels
and
FFO
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
allows
for
a
detailed
analysis
of
the
operating
performance
of
our
hotel
portfolio
by
management
and
investors.
We
present
FFO
applicable
to
common
shares
and
Common
Units
because
our
Common
Units
are
redeemable
for
common
shares.
We
believe
it
is
meaningful
for
the
investor
to
understand
FFO
applicable
to
all
common
shares
and
Common
Units.
29
annual report 2014
The
following
table
reconciles
FFO
for
the
periods
presented
to
the
most
directly
comparable
GAAP
measure,
net
income,
for
the
same
periods
(dollars
in
thousands):
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
December
31,
2012
Year
Ended
Net
income
applicable
to
common
shareholders
$
Income
(loss)
allocated
to
noncontrolling
interests
(Income)
loss
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
Gain
on
hotel
acquisition
Development
Loan
Recovery
Gain
on
disposition
of
hotel
properties
Loss
from
impairment
of
depreciable
assets
Depreciation
and
amortization
Depreciation
and
amortization
from
discontinued
operations
Funds
from
consolidated
hotel
operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders
and
Partnership
units
52,899
$
1,016
(693)
(12,667)
(22,494)
(7,067)
1,800
69,167
-‐
32,752
$
335
1,835
(12,096)
-‐
(32,121)
10,314
55,784
7,050
8,376
(158)
2,124
-‐
-‐
(11,231)
-‐
48,243
9,148
81,961
63,853
56,502
Income
(loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
693
(1,835)
(2,124)
Loss
from
remeasurement
of
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
Impairment
of
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
Depreciation
and
amortization
of
purchase
price
in
excess
of
historical
cost
(1)
Interest
in
depreciation
and
amortization
of
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
(2)
Funds
from
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders
and
Partnership
units
-‐
-‐
570
5,915
7,178
-‐
1,813
596
6,068
6,642
1,892
-‐
902
5,441
6,111
Funds
from
Operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders
and
Partnership
units
$
89,139
$
70,495
$
62,613
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
and
Units
Outstanding
Basic
Diluted
(1)
(2)
199,109,209
208,139,670
198,390,450
208,886,212
187,415,270
198,110,615
Adjustment
made
to
add
depreciation
of
purchase
price
in
excess
of
historical
cost
of
the
assets
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture
at
the
time
of
our
investment.
Adjustment
made
to
add
our
interest
in
real
estate
related
depreciation
and
amortization
of
our
unconsolidated
joint
ventures.
Allocation
of
depreciation
and
amortization
is
consistent
with
allocation
of
income
and
loss.
Certain
amounts
related
to
depreciation
and
amortization
and
depreciation
and
amortization
from
discontinued
operations
in
the
prior
year
FFO
reconciliation
have
been
recast
to
conform
to
the
current
year
presentation.
In
addition,
based
on
guidance
provided
by
NAREIT,
we
have
eliminated
loss
from
the
impairment
of
certain
depreciable
assets,
including
investments
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
and
land,
from
net
income
(loss)
to
arrive
at
FFO
in
each
year
presented.
INFLATION
Operators
of
hotel
properties,
in
general,
possess
the
ability
to
adjust
room
rates
daily
to
reflect
the
effects
of
inflation.
However,
competitive
pressures
may
limit
the
ability
of
our
management
companies
to
raise
room
rates.
30
hersha hospitality trust
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
AND
ESTIMATES
Our
discussion
and
analysis
of
our
financial
condition
and
results
of
operations
are
based
upon
our
consolidated
financial
statements,
which
have
been
prepared
in
accordance
with
accounting
principles
generally
accepted
in
the
United
States.
The
preparation
of
these
financial
statements
requires
us
to
make
estimates
and
judgments
that
affect
the
reported
amounts
of
assets,
liabilities,
revenues
and
expenses,
and
related
disclosure
of
contingent
assets
and
liabilities.
On
an
on-‐going
basis,
estimates
are
evaluated
by
us,
including
those
related
to
carrying
value
of
investments
in
hotel
properties.
Our
estimates
are
based
upon
historical
experience
and
on
various
other
assumptions
we
believe
to
be
reasonable
under
the
circumstances,
the
results
of
which
form
the
basis
for
making
judgments
about
the
carrying
values
of
assets
and
liabilities
that
are
not
readily
apparent
from
other
sources.
Actual
results
may
differ
from
these
estimates
under
different
assumptions
or
conditions.
We
believe
the
following
critical
accounting
policies
affect
our
more
significant
judgments
and
estimates
used
in
the
preparation
of
our
consolidated
financial
statements:
Revenue
Recognition
Approximately
95%
of
our
revenues
are
derived
from
hotel
room
revenues
and
revenue
from
other
hotel
operating
departments.
We
directly
recognize
revenue
and
expense
for
all
consolidated
hotels
as
hotel
operating
revenue
and
hotel
operating
expense
when
earned
and
incurred.
These
revenues
are
recorded
net
of
any
sales
or
occupancy
taxes
collected
from
our
guests.
All
revenues
are
recorded
on
an
accrual
basis,
as
earned.
We
participate
in
frequent
guest
programs
sponsored
by
the
brand
owners
of
our
hotels
and
we
expense
the
charges
associated
with
those
programs,
as
incurred.
Revenue
for
interest
on
development
loan
financing
is
recorded
in
the
period
earned
based
on
the
interest
rate
of
the
loan
and
outstanding
balance
during
the
period.
Development
loans
receivable
and
accrued
interest
on
the
development
loans
receivable
are
evaluated
to
determine
if
outstanding
balances
are
collectible.
Interest
is
recorded
only
if
it
is
determined
the
outstanding
loan
balance
and
accrued
interest
balance
are
collectible.
Other
revenues
consist
primarily
of
fees
earned
for
asset
management
services
provided
to
hotels
we
own
through
unconsolidated
joint
ventures.
Fees
are
earned
as
a
percentage
of
hotel
revenue
and
are
recorded
in
the
period
earned.
New
Accounting
Pronouncements
On
May
28,
2014,
the
FASB
issued
ASU
No.
2014-‐09,
Revenue
from
Contracts
with
Customers,
which
requires
an
entity
to
recognize
the
amount
of
revenue
to
which
it
expects
to
be
entitled
for
the
transfer
of
promised
goods
or
services
to
customers.
The
ASU
will
replace
most
existing
revenue
recognition
guidance
in
U.S.
GAAP
when
it
becomes
effective.
The
new
standard
is
effective
for
the
Company
on
January
1,
2017.
Early
adoption
is
not
permitted.
The
standard
permits
the
use
of
either
the
retrospective
or
cumulative
effect
transition
method.
The
Company
is
evaluating
the
effect
that
ASU
No.
2014-‐09
will
have
on
its
consolidated
financial
statements
and
related
disclosures.
The
Company
has
not
yet
selected
a
transition
method
nor
has
it
determined
the
effect
of
the
standard
on
its
ongoing
financial
reporting.
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties
Investments
in
hotel
properties
are
recorded
at
cost.
Improvements
and
replacements
are
capitalized
when
they
extend
the
useful
life
of
the
asset.
Costs
of
repairs
and
maintenance
are
expensed
as
incurred.
Depreciation
is
computed
using
the
straight-‐line
method
over
the
estimated
useful
life
of
up
to
40
years
for
buildings
and
improvements,
two
to
seven
years
for
furniture,
fixtures
and
equipment.
We
are
required
to
make
31
annual report 2014
subjective
assessments
as
to
the
useful
lives
of
our
properties
for
purposes
of
determining
the
amount
of
depreciation
to
record
on
an
annual
basis
with
respect
to
our
investments
in
hotel
properties.
These
assessments
have
a
direct
impact
on
our
net
income
because
if
we
were
to
shorten
the
expected
useful
lives
of
our
investments
in
hotel
properties
we
would
depreciate
these
investments
over
fewer
years,
resulting
in
more
depreciation
expense
and
lower
net
income
on
an
annual
basis.
Most
identifiable
assets,
liabilities,
noncontrolling
interests,
and
goodwill
related
to
hotel
properties
acquired
in
a
business
combination
are
recorded
at
full
fair
value.
Estimating
techniques
and
assumptions
used
in
determining
fair
values
involve
significant
estimates
and
judgments.
These
estimates
and
judgments
have
a
direct
impact
on
the
carrying
value
of
our
assets
and
liabilities
which
can
directly
impact
the
amount
of
depreciation
expense
recorded
on
an
annual
basis
and
could
have
an
impact
on
our
assessment
of
potential
impairment
of
our
investment
in
hotel
properties.
The
operations
related
to
properties
that
have
been
sold
or
properties
that
are
intended
to
be
sold
are
presented
as
discontinued
operations
in
the
statement
of
operations
for
all
periods
presented,
and
properties
intended
to
be
sold
are
designated
as
“held
for
sale”
on
the
balance
sheet.
Based
on
the
occurrence
of
certain
events
or
changes
in
circumstances,
we
review
the
recoverability
of
the
property’s
carrying
value.
Such
events
or
changes
in
circumstances
include
the
following:
•
•
a
significant
decrease
in
the
market
price
of
a
long-‐lived
asset;
a
significant
adverse
change
in
the
extent
or
manner
in
which
a
long-‐lived
asset
is
being
used
or
in
its
physical
condition;
a
significant
adverse
change
in
legal
factors
or
in
the
business
climate
that
could
affect
the
value
of
a
long-‐lived
asset,
including
an
adverse
action
or
assessment
by
a
regulator;
an
accumulation
of
costs
significantly
in
excess
of
the
amount
originally
expected
for
the
acquisition
or
construction
of
a
long-‐lived
asset;
a
current-‐period
operating
or
cash
flow
loss
combined
with
a
history
of
operating
or
cash
flow
losses
or
a
projection
or
forecast
that
demonstrates
continuing
losses
associated
with
the
use
of
a
long-‐lived
asset;
and
a
current
expectation
that,
it
is
more
likely
than
not
that,
a
long-‐lived
asset
will
be
sold
or
otherwise
disposed
of
significantly
before
the
end
of
its
previously
estimated
useful
life.
•
•
•
•
We
review
our
portfolio
on
an
on-‐going
basis
to
evaluate
the
existence
of
any
of
the
aforementioned
events
or
changes
in
circumstances
that
would
require
us
to
test
for
recoverability.
In
general,
our
review
of
recoverability
is
based
on
an
estimate
of
the
future
undiscounted
cash
flows,
excluding
interest
charges,
expected
to
result
from
the
property’s
use
and
eventual
disposition.
These
estimates
consider
factors
such
as
expected
future
operating
income,
market
and
other
applicable
trends
and
residual
value
expected,
as
well
as
the
effects
of
hotel
demand,
competition
and
other
factors.
If
impairment
exists
due
to
the
inability
to
recover
the
carrying
value
of
a
property,
an
impairment
loss
is
recorded
to
the
extent
that
the
carrying
value
exceeds
the
estimated
fair
value
of
the
property.
We
are
required
to
make
subjective
assessments
as
to
whether
there
are
impairments
in
the
values
of
our
investments
in
hotel
properties.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
based
on
our
analysis,
we
have
determined
that
the
future
cash
flow
of
each
of
the
properties
in
our
portfolio
is
sufficient
to
recover
its
carrying
value.
Investment
in
Joint
Ventures
Properties
owned
in
joint
ventures
are
consolidated
if
the
determination
is
made
that
we
are
the
primary
beneficiary
in
a
variable
interest
entity
(VIE)
or
we
maintain
control
of
the
asset
through
our
voting
interest
or
other
rights
in
the
operation
of
the
entity.
To
determine
if
we
are
the
primary
beneficiary
of
a
VIE,
we
evaluate
whether
we
have
a
controlling
financial
interest
in
that
VIE.
An
enterprise
is
deemed
to
have
a
controlling
financial
interest
if
it
has
i)
the
power
to
direct
the
activities
of
a
variable
interest
entity
that
most
significantly
impact
the
entity’s
economic
performance,
and
ii)
the
obligation
to
absorb
losses
of
the
VIE
that
could
be
significant
to
the
VIE
32
hersha hospitality trust
or
the
rights
to
receive
benefits
from
the
VIE
that
could
be
significant
to
the
VIE.
Control
can
also
be
demonstrated
by
the
ability
of
a
member
to
manage
day-‐to-‐day
operations,
refinance
debt
and
sell
the
assets
of
the
partnerships
without
the
consent
of
the
other
member
and
the
inability
of
the
members
to
replace
the
managing
member.
This
evaluation
requires
significant
judgment.
If
it
is
determined
that
we
do
not
have
a
controlling
interest
in
a
joint
venture,
either
through
our
financial
interest
in
a
VIE
or
our
voting
interest
in
a
voting
interest
entity,
the
equity
method
of
accounting
is
used.
Under
this
method,
the
investment,
originally
recorded
at
cost,
is
adjusted
to
recognize
our
share
of
net
earnings
or
losses
of
the
affiliates
as
they
occur
rather
than
as
dividends
or
other
distributions
are
received,
limited
to
the
extent
of
our
investment
in,
advances
to
and
commitments
for
the
investee.
Pursuant
to
our
joint
venture
agreements,
allocations
of
profits
and
losses
of
some
of
our
investments
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
may
be
allocated
disproportionately
as
compared
to
nominal
ownership
percentages
due
to
specified
preferred
return
rate
thresholds.
The
Company
periodically
reviews
the
carrying
value
of
its
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
to
determine
if
circumstances
exist
indicating
impairment
to
the
carrying
value
of
the
investment
that
is
other
than
temporary.
When
an
impairment
indicator
is
present,
we
will
estimate
the
fair
value
of
the
investment.
Our
estimate
of
fair
value
takes
into
consideration
factors
such
as
expected
future
operating
income,
trends
and
prospects,
as
well
as
the
effects
of
demand,
competition
and
other
factors.
This
determination
requires
significant
estimates
by
management,
including
the
expected
cash
flows
to
be
generated
by
the
assets
owned
and
operated
by
the
joint
venture.
Subsequent
changes
in
estimates
could
impact
the
determination
of
whether
impairment
exists.
To
the
extent
impairment
has
occurred,
the
loss
will
be
measured
as
the
excess
of
the
carrying
amount
over
the
fair
value
of
our
investment
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture.
Accounting
for
Derivative
Financial
Investments
and
Hedging
Activities
We
use
derivatives
to
hedge,
fix
and
cap
interest
rate
risk
and
we
account
for
our
derivative
and
hedging
activities
by
recording
all
derivative
instruments
at
fair
value
on
the
balance
sheet.
Derivative
instruments
designated
in
a
hedge
relationship
to
mitigate
exposure
to
variability
in
expected
future
cash
flows,
or
other
types
of
forecasted
transactions,
are
considered
cash
flow
hedges.
We
formally
document
all
relationships
between
hedging
instruments
and
hedged
items,
as
well
as
our
risk-‐management
objective
and
strategy
for
undertaking
each
hedge
transaction.
Cash
flow
hedges
that
are
considered
highly
effective
are
accounted
for
by
recording
the
fair
value
of
the
derivative
instrument
on
the
balance
sheet
as
either
an
asset
or
liability,
with
a
corresponding
amount
recorded
in
other
comprehensive
income
within
shareholders’
equity.
Amounts
are
reclassified
from
other
comprehensive
income
to
the
income
statements
in
the
period
or
periods
the
hedged
forecasted
transaction
affects
earnings.
Under
cash
flow
hedges,
derivative
gains
and
losses
not
considered
highly
effective
in
hedging
the
change
in
expected
cash
flows
of
the
hedged
item
are
recognized
immediately
in
the
income
statement.
For
hedge
transactions
that
do
not
qualify
for
the
short-‐cut
method,
at
the
hedge’s
inception
and
on
a
regular
basis
thereafter,
a
formal
assessment
is
performed
to
determine
whether
changes
in
the
cash
flows
of
the
derivative
instruments
have
been
highly
effective
in
offsetting
changes
in
cash
flows
of
the
hedged
items
and
whether
they
are
expected
to
be
highly
effective
in
the
future.
RELATED
PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
We
have
entered
into
a
number
of
transactions
and
arrangements
that
involve
related
parties.
For
a
description
of
the
transactions
and
arrangements,
please
see
Note
6,
“Commitments
and
Contingencies
and
Related
Party
Transactions,”
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements.
33
annual report 2014
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
AND
COMMERCIAL
COMMITMENTS
The
following
table
summarizes
our
contractual
obligations
and
commitments
to
make
future
payments
under
contracts,
such
as
debt
and
lease
agreements,
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Contractual
Obligations
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
Long
Term
Debt
$
69,063
$
273,824
$
204,219
$
1,564
$
44,892
$
73,777
Interest
Expense
on
Long
Term
Debt
29,450
22,908
5,155
3,730
3,541
31,072
Unsecured
Term
Loan
Unsecured
Line
of
Credit
Interest
Expense
on
Unsecured
Term
Loan
Hotel
Ground
Rent
Total
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
250,000
-‐
7,320
2,342
7,320
2,374
7,320
2,374
7,320
2,374
651
2,374
-‐
-‐
-‐
229,028
$
108,175
$
306,426
$
219,068
$
14,988
$
301,458
$
333,877
From
time
to
time,
we
acquire
properties
subject
to
an
obligation
to
pay
contingent
consideration
arrangements
with
the
former
owner
if
specified
operating
objectives
are
achieved
by
the
acquired
entity.
Our
current
maximum
cash
payment
under
this
arrangement
is
$2,000
in
2015
the
Parrot
Key
Resort
in
Key
West,
FL.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
recorded
the
full
amount
of
contingent
consideration
as
we
believe
the
likelihood
of
the
hotel
achieving
the
specific
operating
targets
is
probable.
34
hersha hospitality trust
Item
7A.
Quantitative
and
Qualitative
Disclosures
About
Market
Risk
(in
thousands,
except
per
share
data)
Our
primary
market
risk
exposure
is
to
changes
in
interest
rates
on
our
variable
rate
debt
which
has
not
been
effectively
hedged
with
interest
swaps
or
interest
rate
caps.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
are
exposed
to
interest
rate
risk
with
respect
to
variable
rate
borrowings
under
our
$500,000
credit
facility
and
certain
variable
rate
mortgages
and
notes
payable.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
had
total
variable
rate
debt
outstanding
of
$298,048
with
a
weighted
average
interest
rate
of
3.04%.
The
effect
of
a
100
basis
point
increase
or
decrease
in
the
interest
rate
on
our
variable
rate
debt
outstanding
as
of
December
31,
2014
would
be
an
increase
or
decrease
in
our
interest
expense
for
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2014
of
$2,083.
Our
interest
rate
risk
objectives
are
to
limit
the
impact
of
interest
rate
fluctuations
on
earnings
and
cash
flows
and
to
lower
our
overall
borrowing
costs.
To
achieve
these
objectives,
we
manage
our
exposure
to
fluctuations
in
market
interest
rates
for
a
portion
of
our
borrowings
through
the
use
of
fixed
rate
debt
instruments
to
the
extent
that
reasonably
favorable
rates
are
obtainable
with
such
arrangements.
We
have
also
entered
into
derivative
financial
instruments
such
as
interest
rate
swaps
or
caps,
and
in
the
future
may
enter
into
treasury
options
or
locks,
to
mitigate
our
interest
rate
risk
on
a
related
financial
instrument
or
to
effectively
lock
the
interest
rate
on
a
portion
of
our
variable
rate
debt.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
have
an
interest
rate
cap
related
to
debt
on
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
52nd
Street,
New
York,
Hyatt
Union
Square,
New
York,
NY
and
our
two
subordinated
notes
payable,
and
we
have
six
interest
rate
swaps
related
to
debt
on
the
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
Westside,
Los
Angeles,
CA,
Capitol
Hill
Hotel,
Washington
DC,
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
Miami
Beach,
FL,
Duane
Street
Hotel,
New
York,
NY,
and
our
unsecured
credit
facility.
We
do
not
intend
to
enter
into
derivative
or
interest
rate
transactions
for
speculative
purposes.
As
of
December
31,
2014
approximately
84%
of
our
outstanding
consolidated
long-‐term
indebtedness
is
subject
to
fixed
rates
or
effectively
capped,
while
16%
of
our
outstanding
long
term
indebtedness
is
subject
to
floating
rates,
including
borrowings
under
our
revolving
credit
facility.
Changes
in
market
interest
rates
on
our
fixed-‐rate
debt
impact
the
fair
value
of
the
debt,
but
such
changes
have
no
impact
on
interest
expense
incurred.
If
interest
rates
rise
100
basis
points
and
our
fixed
rate
debt
balance
remains
constant,
we
expect
the
fair
value
of
our
debt
to
decrease.
The
sensitivity
analysis
related
to
our
fixed-‐rate
debt
assumes
an
immediate
100
basis
point
move
in
interest
rates
from
their
December
31,
2014
levels,
with
all
other
variables
held
constant.
A
100
basis
point
increase
in
market
interest
rates
would
cause
the
fair
value
of
our
fixed-‐rate
debt
outstanding
at
December
31,
2014
to
be
approximately
$901,571
and
a
100
basis
point
decrease
in
market
interest
rates
would
cause
the
fair
value
of
our
fixed-‐rate
debt
outstanding
at
December
31,
2014
to
be
approximately
$932,755.
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
Total
Fixed
Rate
Debt
$
69,063
$
218,824
$
203,172
$
491
$
150,513
$
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
4.77%
4.29%
3.36%
3.36%
4.40%
22,229
$
4.40%
664,292
4.10%
Floating
Rate
Debt
$
-‐
$
55,000
$
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
3.04%
2.68%
1,047
$
2.68%
1,073
$
144,379
$
2.68%
3.17%
51,548
$
3.17%
253,047
2.88%
$
69,063
$
273,824
$
204,219
$
1,564
$
294,892
$
73,777
$
917,339
Line
of
Credit
Facility
$
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
-‐
$
-
-‐
$
-
-‐
$
-
-‐
$
2.62%
-‐
$
-‐
-‐
$
-‐
$
69,063
$
273,824
$
204,219
$
1,564
$
294,892
$
73,777
$
-‐
2.62%
917,339
The
table
incorporates
only
those
exposures
that
existed
as
of
December
31,
2014,
and
does
not
consider
exposure
or
positions
that
could
arise
after
that
date.
As
a
result,
our
ultimate
realized
gain
or
loss
with
respect
to
interest
rate
fluctuations
will
depend
on
the
exposures
that
arise
during
the
future
period,
prevailing
interest
rates,
and
our
hedging
strategies
at
that
time.
35
annual report 2014
Item
8.
Financial
Statements
and
Supplementary
Data
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
Report
of
Independent
Registered
Public
Accounting
Firm
Consolidated
Balance
Sheets
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
2013
Consolidated
Statement
of
Operations
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
Consolidated
Statements
of
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
Consolidated
Statements
of
Equity
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
Consolidated
Statements
of
Cash
Flows
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
Notes
to
Consolidated
Financial
Statements
Schedule
III
-‐
Real
Estate
and
Accumulated
Depreciation
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
Page
37
38
39
41
42
44
46
88
36
hersha hospitality trust
Report
of
Independent
Registered
Public
Accounting
Firm
The
Board
of
Trustees
and
Shareholders
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust:
We
have
audited
the
accompanying
consolidated
balance
sheets
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
and
subsidiaries
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
and
the
related
consolidated
statements
of
operations,
comprehensive
income,
equity,
and
cash
flows
for
each
of
the
years
in
the
three-‐year
period
ended
December
31,
2014.
In
connection
with
our
audits
of
the
consolidated
financial
statements,
we
have
also
audited
the
financial
statement
schedule
as
listed
in
the
accompanying
index.
These
consolidated
financial
statements
and
financial
statement
schedule
are
the
responsibility
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust’s
management.
Our
responsibility
is
to
express
an
opinion
on
these
consolidated
financial
statements
and
financial
statement
schedule
based
on
our
audits.
We
conducted
our
audits
in
accordance
with
the
standards
of
the
Public
Company
Accounting
Oversight
Board
(United
States).
Those
standards
require
that
we
plan
and
perform
the
audit
to
obtain
reasonable
assurance
about
whether
the
financial
statements
are
free
of
material
misstatement.
An
audit
includes
examining,
on
a
test
basis,
evidence
supporting
the
amounts
and
disclosures
in
the
financial
statements.
An
audit
also
includes
assessing
the
accounting
principles
used
and
significant
estimates
made
by
management,
as
well
as
evaluating
the
overall
financial
statement
presentation.
We
believe
that
our
audits
provide
a
reasonable
basis
for
our
opinion.
In
our
opinion,
the
consolidated
financial
statements
referred
to
above
present
fairly,
in
all
material
respects,
the
financial
position
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
and
subsidiaries
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
and
the
results
of
their
operations
and
their
cash
flows
for
each
of
the
years
in
the
three-‐year
period
ended
December
31,
2014,
in
conformity
with
U.S.
generally
accepted
accounting
principles.
Also
in
our
opinion,
the
related
financial
statement
schedule,
when
considered
in
relation
to
the
basic
consolidated
financial
statements
taken
as
a
whole,
presents
fairly,
in
all
material
respects,
the
information
set
forth
therein.
As
discussed
in
Note
11
to
the
consolidated
financial
statements,
the
Company
has
changed
its
method
for
reporting
discontinued
operations
as
of
January
1,
2014.
We
have
also
audited,
in
accordance
with
the
standards
of
the
Public
Company
Accounting
Oversight
Board
(United
States),
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
as
of
December
31,
2014,
based
on
criteria
established
in
Internal
Control
-‐
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued
by
the
Committee
of
Sponsoring
Organizations
of
the
Treadway
Commission
(COSO),
and
our
report
dated
February
20,
2015,
expressed
an
unqualified
opinion
on
the
effectiveness
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting.
/s/
KPMG
LLP
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
February
20,
2015
37
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated balance sheets
as of december 31, 2014 and 2013
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
Assets:
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties,
Net
of
Accumulated
Depreciation,
Including
Consolidation
of
Variable
Interest
Entity
Assets
of
$84,247
and
$85,759
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Cash
and
Cash
Equivalents
Escrow
Deposits
Hotel
Accounts
Receivable,
Net
of
Allowance
for
Doubtful
Accounts
of
$39
and
$43
Deferred
Financing
Costs,
Net
of
Accumulated
Amortization
of
$6,938
and
$7,070
Due
from
Related
Parties
Intangible
Assets,
Net
of
Accumulated
Amortization
of
$3,514
and
$3,227
Deposits
on
Hotel
Acquisitions
Other
Assets
Hotel
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Total
Assets
Liabilities
and
Equity:
Line
of
Credit
Unsecured
Term
Loan
Unsecured
Notes
Payable
Mortgages
Payable,
including
Net
Unamortized
Premium
and
Consolidation
of
Variable
Interest
Entity
Debt
of
$54,132
and
$55,714
Accounts
Payable,
Accrued
Expenses
and
Other
Liabilities
Dividends
and
Distributions
Payable
Due
to
Related
Parties
Liabilities
Related
to
Hotel
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Total
Liabilities
Equity:
Shareholders'
Equity:
Preferred
Shares:
$.01
Par
Value,
29,000,000
Shares
Authorized,
4,600,000
Series
B
and
3,000,000
Series
C
Shares
Issued
and
Outstanding
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
with
Liquidation
Preferences
of
$25
Per
Share
(Note
1)
Common
Shares:
Class
A,
$.01
Par
Value,
300,000,000
Shares
Authorized
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
198,835,083
and
202,759,419
Shares
Issued
and
Outstanding
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively
Common
Shares:
Class
B,
$.01
Par
Value,
1,000,000
Shares
Authorized,
None
Issued
and
Outstanding
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Additional
Paid-‐in
Capital
Distributions
in
Excess
of
Net
Income
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
(Note
1):
Noncontrolling
Interests
-‐
Common
Units
Noncontrolling
Interests
-‐
Consolidated
Variable
Interest
Entity
Total
Noncontrolling
Interests
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
$
$
$
$
$
1,745,483
11,150
21,675
16,941
9,363
8,605
6,580
7,316
-‐
28,426
-‐
1,855,539
-‐
250,000
51,548
617,375
54,115
17,909
7,203
-‐
998,150
$
$
$
$
1,535,835
12,044
36,213
25,938
9,141
7,570
11,124
7,603
18,586
27,460
56,583
1,748,097
-‐
150,000
51,548
571,953
40,852
15,955
4,815
45,835
880,958
76
$
76
1,989
2,028
-‐
(358)
1,193,056
(365,381)
829,382
29,082
(1,075)
28,007
-‐
(376)
1,200,798
(364,568)
837,958
29,523
(342)
29,181
Total
Equity
Total
Liabilities
and
Equity
857,389
867,139
$
1,855,539
$
1,748,097
The
Accompanying
Notes
Are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
38
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of operations
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
Revenue:
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
Interest
Income
from
Development
Loans
Other
Revenues
Total
Revenues
Operating
Expenses:
Hotel
Operating
Expenses
Insurance
Recoveries
Hotel
Ground
Rent
Real
Estate
and
Personal
Property
Taxes
and
Property
Insurance
General
and
Administrative
(including
Share
Based
Payments
of
$6,028,
$9,746,
and
$9,678
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012,
respectively)
Acquisition
and
Terminated
Transaction
Costs
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Contingent
Consideration
Related
to
Acquisition
of
Hotel
Property
Total
Operating
Expenses
Operating
Income
Interest
Income
Interest
Expense
Other
Expense
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
Gain
on
Hotel
Acquisitions,
net
Development
Loan
Recovery
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2012
$
$
417,226
-‐
180
417,406
$
338,064
158
191
338,413
299,005
1,998
212
301,215
227,324
(4,604)
2,433
30,342
20,363
2,472
69,167
2,000
349,497
188,431
(403)
985
24,083
23,869
974
55,784
-‐
293,723
161,982
-‐
835
19,341
23,377
1,179
48,243
-‐
254,957
67,909
44,690
46,258
805
(43,357)
(485)
7,195
12,667
22,494
(670)
1,784
(40,935)
(102)
-‐
12,096
-‐
(545)
1,311
(38,070)
(43)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(3,189)
Income
Before
Income
(Loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments,
Income
Taxes
and
Discontinued
Operations
66,558
16,988
6,267
Income
(Loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Impairment
of
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Loss
from
Remeasurement
of
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Income
(Loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
Income
Before
Income
Taxes
Income
Tax
Benefit
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
Discontinued
Operations
(Note
11):
(Loss)
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Discontinued
Assets
Impairment
of
Discontinued
Assets
Income
from
Discontinued
Operations,
Net
of
Income
Taxes
(Loss)
Income
from
Discontinued
Operations
693
-‐
-‐
693
(22)
(1,813)
-‐
(1,835)
67,251
15,153
2,685
5,600
69,936
20,753
(128)
(1,800)
263
(1,665)
32,121
(10,314)
7,388
29,195
(232)
-‐
(1,892)
(2,124)
4,143
3,355
7,498
11,231
-‐
3,489
14,720
Net
Income
68,271
49,948
22,218
(Income)
Loss
Allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Preferred
Distributions
Extinguishment
of
Issuance
Costs
Upon
Redemption
of
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
(1,016)
(14,356)
-‐
(335)
(14,611)
(2,250)
158
(14,000)
-‐
Net
Income
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
$
52,899
$
32,752
$
8,376
The
Accompanying
Notes
Are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
39
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of operations (continued)
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
Earnings
Per
Share:
BASIC
Income
(Loss)
from
Continuing
Operations
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Income
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2012
$
0.27
$
0.02
$
(0.03)
(0.01)
0.14
Net
Income
(Loss)
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
$
0.26
$
0.16
$
DILUTED
Income
(Loss)
from
Continuing
Operations
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Income
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
$
0.27
$
0.02
$
(0.03)
(0.01)
0.14
Net
Income
(Loss)
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
$
0.26
$
0.16
$
0.07
0.04
0.07
0.04
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding:
Basic
Diluted*
199,109,209
198,390,450
187,415,270
201,197,310
201,918,177
187,415,270
*
Income
(loss)
allocated
to
noncontrolling
interest
in
Hersha
Hospitality
Limited
Partnership
(the
“Operating
Partnership”
or
“HHLP”)
has
been
excluded
from
the
numerator
and
common
units
of
limited
partnership
interest
(“Common
Units”)
in
the
Operating
Partnership
have
been
omitted
from
the
denominator
for
the
purpose
of
computing
diluted
earnings
per
share
since
the
effect
of
including
these
shares
and
units
in
the
numerator
and
denominator
would
have
no
impact.
In
addition,
potentially
dilutive
common
shares,
if
any,
have
been
excluded
from
the
denominator
if
they
are
anti-‐dilutive
to
income
(loss)
from
continuing
operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders.
The
following
table
summarizes
potentially
dilutive
securities
that
have
been
excluded
from
the
denominator
for
the
purpose
of
computing
diluted
earnings
per
share:
Common
Units
LTIP
Units
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Outstanding
Contingently
Issuable
Share
Awards
Options
to
Acquire
Common
Shares
Outstanding
Total
Potentially
Dilutive
Securities
Excluded
from
the
Denominator
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2012
6,909,649
32,711
-‐
-‐
-‐
6,942,360
6,968,035
7,208,123
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
433,097
2,778,545
275,580
6,968,035
10,695,345
The
Accompanying
Notes
Are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
40
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss)
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands]
Net
Income
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Less:
Reclassification
Adjustment
for
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Included
in
Net
Income
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2012
$
68,271
$
49,948
$
22,218
1,527
2,694
1,073
(1,509)
(1,284)
(1,708)
Comprehensive
Income
Less:
Comprehensive
Loss
(Income)
Attributable
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Less:
Preferred
Distributions
Less:
Extinguishment
of
Issuance
Costs
Upon
Redemption
of
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
Comprehensive
Income
Attributable
to
Common
Shareholders
68,289
(1,016)
(14,356)
-‐
$
52,917
$
51,358
(335)
(14,611)
(2,250)
34,162
$
21,583
158
(14,000)
-‐
7,741
The
Accompanying
Notes
are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
41
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of equity
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
[in thousands, except shares and per share amounts]
Shareholders'
Equity
Class
B
Common
Shares
($)
Preferred
Shares
($)
Additional
Paid-‐In
Capital
($)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
($)
Distributions
in
Excess
of
Net
Earnings
($)
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
($)
70
1,041,027.00
571
(966)
-‐
-‐
(1,151)
-‐
-‐
(310,972)
-‐
-‐
730,673
572
(966)
Preferred
Shares
7,000,000
-‐
-‐
Balance
at
December
31,
2011
Unit
Conversion
Reallocation
of
Noncontrolling
Interest
Common
Stock
Issuance
Common
Stock
Offering,
Net
of
Costs
Common
Stock
Option
Cancellation
Dividends
and
Distributions
declared:
Common
Stock
($0.24
per
share)
Preferred
Stock
Common
Units
($0.24
per
share)
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Stock
Based
Compensation
Grants
Amortization
Consolidation
of
Variable
Interest
Entity
Deconsolidation
of
Consolidated
Joint
Ventures
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Net
Income
(Loss)
Balance
at
December
31,
2012
Unit
Conversion/Redemption
Reallocation
of
Noncontrolling
Interest
Preferred
Shares
Preferred
Share
Offering,
Net
of
Costs
Preferred
Share
Redemption
Dividends
and
Distributions
declared:
Common
Shares
($0.24
per
share)
Preferred
Shares
Common
Units
($0.24
per
share)
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Share
Based
Compensation:
Grants
Amortization
Consolidation
of
Variable
Interest
Entity
Deconsolidation
of
Consolidated
Joint
Ventures
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Net
Income
Balance
at
December
31,
2013
Unit
Conversion/Redemption
Restricted
Shares
Forfeiture/LTIP
Unit
Issuance
Repurchase
of
Common
Shares
Reclassification
of
Noncontrolling
Interest
Preferred
Stock
Preferred
Stock
Offering,
Net
of
Costs
Preferred
Stock
Redemption
Dividends
and
Distributions
declared:
Common
Shares
($0.26
per
share)
Preferred
Shares
Common
Units
($0.26
per
share)
LTIP
Units
($0.07
per
share)
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Share
Based
Compensation:
Grants
Amortization
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Net
Income
Balance
at
December
31,
2014
Common
Shares
169,969,973
157,810
-‐
Class
A
Common
Shares
($)
1,699
1
-‐
24,000,000
2,521,561
240
25
-‐
-‐
-‐
5,117
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
2,017,895
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
198,672,356
27,790
-‐
21
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
1,986
1
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
7,206
4,052,067
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
41
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
202,759,419
18,900
(1,948,324)
(2,626,854)
-‐
-‐
-‐
2,028
-‐
(19)
(26)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
8,647
641,295
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
6
-‐
-‐
-‐
198,853,083
-‐
-‐
1,989
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
7,000,000
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
70
-‐
-‐
128,318
(25)
-‐
-‐
-‐
24
2,616
6,727
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
1,178,292
(234)
-‐
-‐
3,000,000
-‐
(2,400,000)
30
(24)
72,340
(59,976)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
38
467
9,871
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(635)
-‐
(1,786)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
7,600,000
-‐
-‐
-‐
76
-‐
-‐
-‐
1,200,798
(77)
1,410
-‐
(376)
-‐
-‐
49,613
(364,568)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
19
(13,771)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
50
641
5,396
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
7,600,000
-‐
-‐
76
-‐
-‐
1,193,056
18
-‐
(358)
-‐
67,255
(365,381)
18
67,255
829,382
-‐
-‐
-‐
128,558
-‐
(46,138)
(14,000)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
22,376
(348,734)
-‐
-‐
(46,138)
(14,000)
-‐
24
2,637
6,727
-‐
-‐
(635)
22,376
829,828
(233)
-‐
-‐
72,370
(60,000)
(50,836)
(14,611)
-‐
-‐
(50,836)
(14,611)
-‐
38
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
508
9,871
-‐
-‐
1,410
49,613
837,958
(77)
-‐
(15,418)
-‐
-‐
(1,621)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(52,091)
(14,356)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(52,091)
(14,356)
-‐
-‐
50
-‐
-‐
647
5,396
The
Accompanying
Notes
are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
42
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
($)
Shares
730,673
572
(966)
4,206,064
-‐
(157,810)
Common
Units
($)
16,862
(572)
-‐
Consolidated
Joint
Ventures
($)
307
-‐
-‐
Consolidated
Variable
Interest
Entity
($)
-‐
-‐
-‐
Total
Noncontrolling
Interests
($)
17,169
(572)
-‐
Shares
Total
Equity
($)
747,842
3,064,252
-‐
-‐
-‐
(966)
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of equity (continued)
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
[in thousands, except shares and per share amounts]
Balance
at
December
31,
2011
Unit
Conversion
Reallocation
of
Noncontrolling
Interest
Common
Stock
Issuance
Common
Stock
Offering,
Net
of
Costs
Common
Stock
Option
Cancellation
Dividends
and
Distributions
declared:
Common
Stock
($0.24
per
share)
Preferred
Stock
Common
Units
($0.24
per
share)
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Stock
Based
Compensation
Grants
Amortization
Consolidation
of
Variable
Interest
Entity
Deconsolidation
of
Consolidated
Joint
Ventures
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Net
Income
(Loss)
Balance
at
December
31,
2012
Unit
Conversion/Redemption
Reallocation
of
Noncontrolling
Interest
Preferred
Shares
Preferred
Share
Offering,
Net
of
Costs
Preferred
Share
Redemption
Dividends
and
Distributions
declared:
Common
Shares
($0.24
per
share)
Preferred
Shares
Common
Units
($0.24
per
share)
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Share
Based
Compensation:
Grants
Amortization
Consolidation
of
Variable
Interest
Entity
Deconsolidation
of
Consolidated
Joint
Ventures
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Net
Income
Balance
at
December
31,
2013
Unit
Conversion/Redemption
Restricted
Shares
Forfeiture/LTIP
Unit
Issuance
Repurchase
of
Common
Shares
Reclassification
of
Noncontrolling
Interest
Preferred
Stock
Preferred
Stock
Offering,
Net
of
Costs
Preferred
Stock
Redemption
Dividends
and
Distributions
declared:
Common
Shares
($0.26
per
share)
Preferred
Shares
Common
Units
($0.26
per
share)
LTIP
Units
($0.07
per
share)
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Share
Based
Compensation:
Grants
Amortization
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instruments
Net
Income
Balance
at
December
31,
2014
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
128,558
-‐
(46,138)
(14,000)
-‐
24
2,637
6,727
-‐
-‐
(635)
22,376
829,828
(233)
-‐
72,370
(60,000)
4,048,254
(197,790)
3,064,252
-‐
-‐
(50,836)
(14,611)
-‐
38
508
9,871
-‐
-‐
1,410
49,613
837,958
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
6,914,716
(77)
(65,304)
-‐
(15,418)
-‐
1,948,324
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(52,091)
(14,356)
-‐
-‐
50
647
5,396
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(991)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
185
15,484
(766)
15,365
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,669)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
1,109
29,523
(261)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,793)
(136)
-‐
-‐
-‐
18
67,255
829,382
8,797,736
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
1,749
29,082
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(307)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
956
-‐
(480)
476
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(818)
(342)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
128,558
-‐
(46,138)
(14,000)
(991)
24
2,637
6,727
956
(307)
-‐
-‐
(991)
-‐
-‐
-‐
956
(307)
-‐
(295)
15,960
(766)
15,365
(635)
22,081
-‐
-‐
845,788
3,064,252
-‐
(999)
15,365
-‐
-‐
72,370
(60,000)
(3,064,252)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,669)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
291
29,181
(261)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(50,836)
(14,611)
(1,669)
38
508
9,871
-‐
-‐
1,410
49,904
867,139
(338)
-‐
(15,418)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,793)
(136)
-‐
(52,091)
(14,356)
(1,793)
(136)
50
-‐
-‐
647
5,396
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Common
Units
($)
14,955
-‐
966
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(736)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
136
15,321
-‐
(15,365)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
44
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
43
The
Accompanying
Notes
are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
-‐
(733)
(1,075)
-‐
1,016
28,007
18
68,271
857,389
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of cash flows
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
[in thousands]
Operating
Activities:
Net
Income
Adjustments
to
Reconcile
Net
Income
to
Net
Cash
Provided
by
Operating
Activities:
Gain
on
Hotel
Acquisitions,
Net
Contingent
Consideration
Development
Loan
Recovery
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
Impairment
of
Hotel
Assets
Deferred
Taxes
Depreciation
Amortization
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
Development
Loan
Interest
Added
to
Principal
Equity
in
Loss
of
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Distributions
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Loss
Recognized
on
Change
in
Fair
Value
of
Derivative
Instrument
Share
Based
Compensation
Expense
Change
in
Assets
and
Liabilities:
(Increase)
Decrease
in:
Hotel
Accounts
Receivable
Escrows
Other
Assets
Due
from
Related
Parties
Increase
(Decrease)
in:
$
$
Due
to
Related
Parties
Accounts
Payable,
Accrued
Expenses
and
Other
Liabilities
Net
Cash
Provided
by
Operating
Activities
Investing
Activities:
Purchase
of
Hotel
Property
Assets
Deposits
on
Hotel
Acquisitions,
Net
Capital
Expenditures
Cash
Paid
for
Hotel
Development
Projects
Proceeds
from
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
Net
Changes
in
Capital
Expenditure
Escrows
Investment
in
Notes
Receivable
Repayment
of
Notes
Receivable
Proceeds
from
Insurance
Claims
Repayment
of
Development
Loans
Receivable
Distributions
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Advances
and
Capital
Contributions
to
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Net
Cash
Used
in
Investing
Activities
$
2014
2013
2012
$
68,271
$
49,948
$
22,218
(12,667)
2,000
(22,494)
(7,067)
1,800
(2,685)
68,753
1,979
673
-‐
(693)
1,262
71
6,028
(350)
1,272
2,182
4,544
2,388
(2,373)
112,894
(175,236)
-‐
(38,342)
(3,764)
30,056
4,577
-‐
-‐
1,881
-‐
324
-‐
(180,504)
$
$
$
(12,096)
-‐
-‐
(32,121)
10,314
(5,500)
61,801
2,545
471
-‐
1,835
568
22
9,746
2,419
476
(4,269)
(2,636)
412
6,326
90,261
(217,142)
(1,836)
(42,854)
(20,054)
136,015
(1,287)
-‐
-‐
5,001
15,122
1,711
(150)
(125,474)
$
$
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
(11,231)
-‐
(3,355)
56,071
3,680
2,261
(678)
2,124
1,387
658
9,678
(235)
(1,944)
(2,683)
(5,500)
1,541
(2,236)
71,756
(67,637)
(18,750)
(28,443)
(10,171)
63,722
(4,454)
(150)
1,720
-‐
8,000
476
(130)
(55,817)
The
Accompanying
Notes
are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
44
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
consolidated statements of cash flows (continued)
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands]
Financing
Activities:
Proceeds
from
(Repayments
of)
Borrowings
Under
Line
of
Credit,
Net
Proceeds
from
Unsecured
Term
Loan
Borrowing
Principal
Repayment
of
Mortgages
and
Notes
Payable
Proceeds
from
Mortgages
and
Notes
Payable
Cash
Paid
for
Deferred
Financing
Costs
Proceeds
from
Issuance
of
Preferred
Shares,
Net
Proceeds
from
Issuance
of
Common
Shares,
Net
Redemption
of
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
Repurchase
of
Common
Shares
Redemption
of
Common
Partnership
Units
Settlement
of
Interest
Rate
Cap
Dividends
Paid
on
Common
Shares
Dividends
Paid
on
Preferred
Shares
Distributions
Paid
on
Common
Partnership
Units
Net
Cash
Provided
by
Financing
Activities
Net
Increase
(Decrease)
in
Cash
and
Cash
Equivalents
Cash
and
Cash
Equivalents
-‐
Beginning
of
Period
2014
2013
2012
$
$
$
-‐
100,000
(61,348)
101,000
(4,450)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(15,418)
(338)
(8)
(50,286)
(14,356)
(1,724)
53,072
(14,538)
36,213
$
$
$
-‐
50,000
(54,398)
65,000
(2,283)
72,370
-‐
(60,000)
-‐
(1,000)
(565)
(50,553)
(14,522)
(1,682)
2,367
(32,846)
69,059
$
$
$
(51,000)
100,000
(187,478)
98,695
(96)
-‐
128,558
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
(44,391)
(14,000)
(1,736)
28,552
44,491
24,568
Cash
and
Cash
Equivalents
-‐
End
of
Period
$
21,675
$
36,213
$
69,059
The
Accompanying
Notes
are
an
Integral
Part
of
These
Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
45
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
(“we”
or
the
“Company”)
was
formed
in
May
1998
as
a
self-‐administered,
Maryland
real
estate
investment
trust.
We
have
elected
to
be
taxed
and
expect
to
continue
to
elect
to
be
taxed
as
a
real
estate
investment
trust,
or
REIT,
for
federal
income
tax
purposes.
The
Company
owns
a
controlling
general
partnership
interest
in
Hersha
Hospitality
Limited
Partnership
(“HHLP”
or
the
“Partnership”),
which
owns
a
99%
limited
partnership
interest
in
various
subsidiary
partnerships.
Hersha
Hospitality,
LLC
(“HHLLC”),
a
Virginia
limited
liability
company,
owns
a
1%
general
partnership
interest
in
the
subsidiary
partnerships
and
the
Partnership
is
the
sole
member
of
HHLLC.
The
Partnership
owns
a
taxable
REIT
subsidiary
(“TRS”),
44
New
England
Management
Company
(“44
New
England”
or
“TRS
Lessee”),
which
leases
certain
of
the
Company’s
hotels.
Hersha’s
common
shares
of
beneficial
interest
trade
on
the
New
York
Stock
Exchange
(“the
NYSE”)
under
the
ticker
symbol
"HT",
its
8.0%
Series
B
preferred
shares
of
beneficial
interest
trade
on
the
NYSE
under
the
ticker
symbol
“HT
PR
B”
and
its
6.875%
Series
C
preferred
shares
of
beneficial
interest
trade
on
the
NYSE
under
the
ticker
symbol
“HT
PR
C.”
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
Company,
through
the
Partnership
and
subsidiary
partnerships,
wholly
owned
46
limited
and
full
service
hotels.
All
of
the
wholly
owned
hotel
facilities
are
leased
to
the
Company’s
TRS,
44
New
England.
In
addition
to
the
wholly
owned
hotel
properties,
as
of
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
owned
joint
venture
interests
in
another
five
properties.
The
properties
owned
by
the
joint
ventures
are
leased
to
a
TRS
owned
by
the
joint
venture
or
to
an
entity
owned
by
the
joint
venture
partners
and
44
New
England.
The
following
table
lists
the
properties
owned
by
these
joint
ventures:
Joint
Venture
Ownership
Property
Location
Lessee/Sublessee
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
66.7%
Marriott
Mystic,
CT
Mystic
Partners
Leaseco,
8.8%
Hilton
Hartford,
CT
Mystic
Partners
Leaseco,
LLC
15.0%
Marriott
Hartford,
CT
LLC
Mystic
Partners
Leaseco,
LLC
SB
Partners,
LLC
Hiren
Boston,
LLC
50.0%
50.0%
Holiday
Inn
Express
Courtyard
South
Boston,
MA
South
Bay
Sandeep,
LLC
South
Boston,
MA
South
Bay
Boston,
LLC
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
owns
an
interest
in
three
hotel
properties.
Our
interest
in
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
is
relative
to
our
interest
in
each
of
the
three
properties
owned
by
the
joint
venture
as
defined
in
the
joint
venture’s
governing
documents.
Each
of
the
three
properties
owned
by
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
is
leased
to
a
separate
entity
that
is
consolidated
in
Mystic
Partners
Leaseco,
LLC
which
is
owned
by
44
New
England
and
our
joint
venture
partner
in
Mystic
Partners,
LLC.
The
properties
are
managed
by
eligible
independent
management
companies,
including
Hersha
Hospitality
Management,
LP
(“HHMLP”).
HHMLP
is
owned
in
part
by
certain
of
our
trustees
and
executive
officers
and
other
unaffiliated
third
party
investors.
Principles
of
Consolidation
and
Presentation
The
accompanying
consolidated
financial
statements
have
been
prepared
in
accordance
with
U.S.
generally
accepted
accounting
principles
and
include
all
of
our
accounts
as
well
as
accounts
of
the
Partnership,
subsidiary
partnerships
and
our
wholly
owned
TRS
Lessee.
All
significant
inter-‐company
amounts
have
been
eliminated.
46
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Consolidated
properties
are
either
wholly
owned
or
owned
less
than
100%
by
the
Partnership
and
are
controlled
by
the
Company
as
general
partner
of
the
Partnership.
Properties
owned
in
joint
ventures
are
also
consolidated
if
the
determination
is
made
that
we
are
the
primary
beneficiary
in
a
variable
interest
entity
(VIE)
or
we
maintain
control
of
the
asset
through
our
voting
interest
in
the
entity.
Control
can
be
demonstrated
when
the
general
partner
has
the
power
to
impact
the
economic
performance
of
the
partnership,
which
includes
the
ability
of
the
general
partner
to
manage
day-‐to-‐day
operations,
refinance
debt
and
sell
the
assets
of
the
partnerships
without
the
consent
of
the
limited
partners
and
the
inability
of
the
limited
partners
to
replace
the
general
partner.
Control
can
be
demonstrated
by
the
limited
partners
if
the
limited
partners
have
the
right
to
dissolve
or
liquidate
the
partnership
or
otherwise
remove
the
general
partner
without
cause
or
have
rights
to
participate
in
the
significant
decisions
made
in
the
ordinary
course
of
the
partnership’s
business.
We
evaluate
each
of
our
investments
and
contractual
relationships
to
determine
whether
they
meet
the
guidelines
of
consolidation.
Entities
are
consolidated
if
the
determination
is
made
that
we
are
the
primary
beneficiary
in
a
VIE
or
we
maintain
control
of
the
asset
through
our
voting
interest
or
other
rights
in
the
operation
of
the
entity.
To
determine
if
we
are
the
primary
beneficiary
of
a
VIE,
we
evaluate
whether
we
have
a
controlling
financial
interest
in
that
VIE.
An
enterprise
is
deemed
to
have
a
controlling
financial
interest
if
it
has
i)
the
power
to
direct
the
activities
of
a
variable
interest
entity
that
most
significantly
impact
the
entity’s
economic
performance,
and
ii)
the
obligation
to
absorb
losses
of
the
VIE
that
could
be
significant
to
the
VIE
or
the
rights
to
receive
benefits
from
the
VIE
that
could
be
significant
to
the
VIE.
Control
can
also
be
demonstrated
by
the
ability
of
a
member
to
manage
day-‐to-‐day
operations,
refinance
debt
and
sell
the
assets
of
the
partnerships
without
the
consent
of
the
other
member
and
the
inability
of
the
members
to
replace
the
managing
member.
Based
on
our
examination,
the
following
entities
were
determined
to
be
VIE’s:
Mystic
Partners,
LLC;
Mystic
Partners
Leaseco,
LLC;
South
Bay
Boston,
LLC;
Brisam
Management
DE,
LLC;
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
I;
and
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
II.
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
is
a
VIE
entity,
however
because
we
are
not
the
primary
beneficiary
it
is
not
consolidated
by
the
Company.
Our
maximum
exposure
to
losses
due
to
our
investment
in
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
is
limited
to
our
investment
in
the
joint
venture
which
is
$5,556
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Also,
Mystic
Partners
Leaseco,
LLC;
and
South
Bay
Boston,
LLC
lease
hotel
properties
from
our
joint
venture
interests
and
are
VIEs.
These
entities
are
consolidated
by
the
lessors,
the
primary
beneficiaries
of
each
entity.
Brisam
Management
DE,
LLC
is
consolidated
in
our
financial
statements,
as
we
are
considered
to
be
the
primary
beneficiary.
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
I
and
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
II
are
VIEs
but
HHLP
is
not
the
primary
beneficiary
in
these
entities.
Accordingly,
the
accounts
of
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
I
and
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
II
are
not
consolidated
with
and
into
HHLP.
We
allocate
resources
and
assess
operating
performance
based
on
individual
hotels
and
consider
each
one
of
our
hotels
to
be
an
operating
segment.
All
of
our
individual
operating
segments
meet
the
aggregation
criteria.
All
of
our
other
real
estate
investment
activities
are
immaterial
and
meet
the
aggregation
criteria,
and
thus,
we
report
one
segment:
investment
in
hotel
properties.
Use
of
Estimates
The
preparation
of
financial
statements
in
conformity
with
accounting
principles
generally
accepted
in
the
United
States
(US
GAAP)
requires
management
to
make
estimates
and
assumptions
that
affect
the
reported
amount
of
assets
and
liabilities
and
disclosure
of
contingent
assets
and
liabilities
at
the
date
of
the
financial
statements
and
the
reported
amounts
of
revenue
and
expenses
during
the
reporting
period.
Actual
results
could
differ
from
those
estimates.
Although
we
believe
the
assumptions
and
estimates
we
made
are
reasonable
and
appropriate,
as
discussed
in
the
applicable
sections
throughout
these
Consolidated
Financial
Statements,
different
assumptions
and
estimates
could
materially
impact
our
reported
results.
The
current
economic
environment
has
increased
the
degree
of
uncertainty
inherent
in
these
estimates
and
assumptions
and
changes
in
market
conditions
could
impact
our
future
operating
results.
47
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties
The
Company
allocates
the
purchase
price
of
hotel
properties
acquired
based
on
the
fair
value
of
the
acquired
real
estate,
furniture,
fixtures
and
equipment,
and
intangible
assets
and
the
fair
value
of
liabilities
assumed,
including
debt.
The
fair
value
allocations
were
determined
using
Level
3
inputs,
which
are
typically
unobservable
and
are
based
on
our
own
assumptions,
as
there
is
little,
if
any,
related
market
activity.
The
Company’s
investments
in
hotel
properties
are
carried
at
cost
and
are
depreciated
using
the
straight-‐line
method
over
the
following
estimated
useful
lives:
Building
and
Improvements
7
to
40
Years
Furniture,
Fixtures
and
Equipment
2
to
7
Years
The
Company
periodically
reviews
the
carrying
value
of
each
hotel
to
determine
if
circumstances
indicate
impairment
to
the
carrying
value
of
the
investment
in
the
hotel
or
that
depreciation
periods
should
be
modified.
If
facts
or
circumstances
support
the
possibility
of
impairment,
the
Company
will
prepare
an
estimate
of
the
undiscounted
future
cash
flows,
without
interest
charges,
of
the
specific
hotel.
Based
on
the
properties
undiscounted
future
cash
flows,
the
Company
will
determine
if
the
investment
in
such
hotel
is
recoverable.
If
impairment
is
indicated,
an
adjustment
will
be
made
to
reduce
the
carrying
value
of
the
hotel
to
reflect
the
hotel
at
fair
value.
We
consider
a
hotel
to
be
held
for
sale
when
management
and
our
independent
trustees
commit
to
a
plan
to
sell
the
property,
the
property
is
available
for
sale,
management
engages
in
an
active
program
to
locate
a
buyer
for
the
property
and
it
is
probable
the
sale
will
be
completed
within
a
year
of
the
initiation
of
the
plan
to
sell.
Acquisition-‐related
cost,
such
as
due
diligence,
legal
and
accounting
fees,
are
not
capitalized
or
applied
in
determining
the
fair
value
of
the
above
acquired
assets.
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
If
it
is
determined
that
we
do
not
have
a
controlling
interest
in
a
joint
venture,
either
through
our
financial
interest
in
a
VIE
or
our
voting
interest
in
a
voting
interest
entity,
the
equity
method
of
accounting
is
used.
Under
this
method,
the
investment,
originally
recorded
at
cost,
is
adjusted
to
recognize
our
share
of
net
earnings
or
losses
of
the
affiliates
as
they
occur
rather
than
as
dividends
or
other
distributions
are
received,
limited
to
the
extent
of
our
investment
in,
advances
to
and
commitments
for
the
investee.
Pursuant
to
our
joint
venture
agreements,
allocations
of
profits
and
losses
of
some
of
our
investments
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
may
be
allocated
disproportionately
as
compared
to
nominal
ownership
percentages
due
to
specified
preferred
return
rate
thresholds.
The
Company
periodically
reviews
the
carrying
value
of
its
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
to
determine
if
circumstances
indicate
impairment
to
the
carrying
value
of
the
investment
that
is
other
than
temporary.
When
an
impairment
indicator
is
present,
we
will
estimate
the
fair
value
of
the
investment.
Our
estimate
of
fair
value
takes
into
consideration
factors
such
as
expected
future
operating
income,
trends
and
prospects,
as
well
as
the
effects
of
demand,
competition
and
other
factors.
This
determination
requires
significant
estimates
by
management,
including
the
expected
cash
flows
to
be
generated
by
the
assets
owned
and
operated
by
the
joint
venture.
To
the
extent
impairment
has
occurred
and
the
impairment
is
considered
other
than
temporary,
the
loss
will
be
measured
as
the
excess
of
the
carrying
amount
over
the
fair
value
of
our
investment
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture.
Cash
and
Cash
Equivalents
Cash
and
cash
equivalents
represent
cash
on
hand
and
in
banks
plus
short-‐term
investments
with
an
initial
maturity
of
three
months
or
less
when
purchased.
48
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Escrow
Deposits
Escrow
deposits
include
reserves
for
debt
service,
real
estate
taxes,
and
insurance
and
reserves
for
furniture,
fixtures,
and
equipment
replacements,
as
required
by
certain
mortgage
debt
agreement
restrictions
and
provisions.
Hotel
Accounts
Receivable
Hotel
accounts
receivable
consists
primarily
of
meeting
and
banquet
room
rental
and
hotel
guest
receivables.
The
Company
generally
does
not
require
collateral.
Ongoing
credit
evaluations
are
performed
and
an
allowance
for
potential
losses
from
uncollectible
accounts
is
provided
against
the
portion
of
accounts
receivable
that
is
estimated
to
be
uncollectible.
Deferred
Financing
Costs
Deferred
financing
costs
are
recorded
at
cost
and
amortized
over
the
terms
of
the
related
indebtedness
using
the
effective
interest
method.
Due
from/to
Related
Parties
Due
from/to
Related
Parties
represents
current
receivables
and
payables
resulting
from
transactions
related
to
hotel
management
and
project
management
with
affiliated
entities.
Due
from
related
parties
results
primarily
from
advances
of
shared
costs
incurred
and
interest
receivable
on
development
loans
made
to
related
parties.
Due
to
affiliates
results
primarily
from
hotel
management
and
project
management
fees
incurred.
Both
due
to
and
due
from
related
parties
are
generally
settled
within
a
period
not
to
exceed
one
year.
Intangible
Assets
and
Liabilities
Intangible
assets
consist
of
leasehold
intangibles
for
above-‐market
value
of
in-‐place
leases
and
deferred
franchise
fees.
The
leasehold
intangibles
are
amortized
over
the
remaining
lease
term.
Deferred
franchise
fees
are
amortized
using
the
straight-‐line
method
over
the
life
of
the
franchise
agreement.
Intangible
liabilities
consist
of
leasehold
intangibles
for
below-‐market
value
of
in-‐place
leases.
The
leasehold
intangibles
are
amortized
over
the
remaining
lease
term.
Intangible
liabilities
are
included
in
the
accounts
payable,
accrued
expenses
and
other
liabilities
on
the
Company’s
consolidated
balance
sheets.
Development
Project
Capitalization
We
have
opportunistically
engaged
in
the
development
and
re-‐development
of
hotel
assets.
We
capitalize
expenditures
related
to
hotel
development
projects
and
renovations,
including
indirect
costs
such
as
interest
expense,
real
estate
taxes
and
utilities
related
to
hotel
development
projects
and
renovations.
Noncontrolling
Interest
Noncontrolling
interest
in
the
Partnership
represents
the
limited
partner’s
proportionate
share
of
the
equity
of
the
Partnership.
Income
(loss)
is
allocated
to
noncontrolling
interest
in
accordance
with
the
weighted
average
percentage
ownership
of
the
Partnership
during
the
period.
At
the
end
of
each
reporting
period
the
appropriate
adjustments
to
the
income
(loss)
are
made
based
upon
the
weighted
average
percentage
ownership
of
the
Partnership
during
the
period.
Our
ownership
interest
in
the
Partnership
as
of
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
was
95.8%,
96.7%,
and
96.5%,
respectively.
49
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
We
define
a
noncontrolling
interest
as
the
portion
of
equity
in
a
subsidiary
not
attributable,
directly
or
indirectly,
to
a
parent.
Such
noncontrolling
interests
are
reported
on
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
within
equity,
but
separately
from
the
shareholders’
equity.
Revenues,
expenses
and
net
income
or
loss
attributable
to
both
the
Company
and
noncontrolling
interests
are
reported
on
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations.
In
accordance
with
US
GAAP,
we
classify
securities
that
are
redeemable
for
cash
or
other
assets
at
the
option
of
the
holder,
or
not
solely
within
the
control
of
the
issuer,
outside
of
permanent
equity
in
the
consolidated
balance
sheet.
The
Company
makes
this
determination
based
on
terms
in
applicable
agreements,
specifically
in
relation
to
redemption
provisions.
Additionally,
with
respect
to
noncontrolling
interests
for
which
the
Company
has
a
choice
to
settle
the
contract
by
delivery
of
its
own
shares,
the
Company
considers
the
guidance
in
US
GAAP
to
evaluate
whether
the
Company
controls
the
actions
or
events
necessary
to
issue
the
maximum
number
of
common
shares
that
could
be
required
to
be
delivered
at
the
time
of
settlement
of
the
contract.
We
classify
the
noncontrolling
interests
of
our
consolidated
joint
ventures,
consolidated
variable
interest
entity,
and
certain
Common
Units
(“Nonredeemable
Common
Units”)
as
equity.
The
noncontrolling
interests
of
Nonredeemable
Common
Units
totaled
$29,082
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
$29,523
as
of
December
31,
2013.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
there
were
8,797,736
Nonredeemable
Common
Units
outstanding
with
a
fair
market
value
of
$61,848,
based
on
the
price
per
share
of
our
common
shares
on
the
NYSE
on
such
date.
In
accordance
with
the
partnership
agreement
of
the
Partnership,
holders
of
these
units
may
redeem
them
for
cash
unless
we,
in
our
sole
and
absolute
discretion,
elect
to
issue
common
shares
on
a
one-‐for-‐one
basis
in
lieu
of
paying
cash.
Prior
to
February
1,
2013,
certain
Common
Units
(“Redeemable
Common
Units”)
had
been
pledged
as
collateral
in
connection
with
a
pledge
and
security
agreement
entered
into
by
the
Company
and
the
holders
of
the
Redeemable
Common
Units.
The
redemption
feature
contained
in
the
pledge
and
security
agreement
where
the
Redeemable
Common
Units
served
as
collateral
contains
a
provision
that
could
result
in
a
net
cash
settlement
outside
of
the
control
of
the
Company.
As
a
result,
prior
to
February
1,
2013,
the
Redeemable
Common
Units
were
classified
in
the
mezzanine
section
of
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
as
they
did
not
meet
the
requirements
for
equity
classification
under
US
GAAP.
Effective
February
1,
2013,
the
aforementioned
pledge
and
security
agreement
is
no
longer
in
place
and
therefore
these
Common
Units
have
been
treated
as
Nonredeemable
Common
Units.
The
carrying
value
of
the
Redeemable
Common
Units
equals
the
greater
of
carrying
value
based
on
the
accumulation
of
historical
cost
or
the
redemption
value.
As
of
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
there
were
no
outstanding
Common
Units
designated
as
Redeemable
Common
Units.
Net
income
or
loss
attributed
to
Nonredeemable
Common
Units
and
Redeemable
Common
Units
(collectively,
“Common
Units”),
as
well
as
the
net
income
or
loss
related
to
the
noncontrolling
interests
of
our
consolidated
joint
venture
and
consolidated
variable
interest
entity,
is
included
in
net
income
or
loss
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations.
Net
income
or
loss
attributed
to
the
Common
Units
and
the
noncontrolling
interests
of
our
consolidated
joint
ventures
and
consolidated
variable
interest
entity
is
excluded
from
net
income
or
loss
applicable
to
common
shareholders
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations.
Shareholders’
Equity
On
February
25,
2013,
we
completed
a
public
offering
of
3,000,000
6.875%
Series
C
Cumulative
Redeemable
Preferred
Shares.
These
shares
have
a
par
value
of
$0.01
per
share
with
a
$25.00
liquidation
preference
per
share.
Net
proceeds
of
the
offering,
after
deducting
the
underwriting
discount
and
the
offering
expenses
payable
by
us,
were
approximately
$72,370.
We
utilized
the
net
proceeds
of
the
offering
to
redeem
all
outstanding
8.00%
Series
A
Cumulative
Redeemable
Preferred
Shares
on
March
28,
2013,
and
for
general
corporate
purposes.
The
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
were
50
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
redeemed
at
a
per
share
redemption
price
of
$25.00
together
with
accrued
and
unpaid
dividends
to
the
redemption
date
for
an
aggregate
per
share
redemption
price
of
$25.4056.
Dividends
ceased
accruing
on
the
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
on
March
28,
2013.
Terms
of
the
Series
B
and
Series
C
Preferred
Shares
outstanding
at
December
31,
2014
and
2013
are
summarized
as
follows:
Shares
Outstanding
Dividend
Per
Share
Year
Ended
December
31,
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
Aggregate
Liquidation
Preference
Distribution
Rate
2014
2013
4,600,000
3,000,000
7,600,000
4,600,000
$
3,000,000
7,600,000
115,000
75,000
8.000%
$
6.875%
2.0000
$
1.7188
2.0000
1.4753
Series
Series
B
Series
C
Total
In
December
2012,
our
Board
of
Trustees
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$75,000
of
our
outstanding
common
shares
through
December
31,
2013.
We
did
not
repurchase
any
common
shares
prior
to
the
expiration
of
the
share
repurchase
program.
In
January
2014,
our
Board
of
Trustees
again
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$75,000
of
our
outstanding
common
shares.
In
February
2015,
our
Board
of
Trustees
again
authorized
us
to
repurchase
from
time
to
time
up
to
an
aggregate
of
$100,000
of
our
outstanding
shares.
The
current
share
repurchase
program
will
expire
on
December
31,
2015.
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
the
Company
repurchased
2,626,854
common
shares
for
an
aggregate
purchase
price
of
$15,418.
As
of
February
20,
2015,
we
have
not
repurchased
any
common
shares
pursuant
to
the
newly
reauthorized
share
repurchase
program.
Upon
repurchase
by
the
Company,
these
common
shares
ceased
to
be
outstanding
and
became
authorized
but
unissued
common
shares.
On
August
4,
2009,
we
entered
into
a
purchase
agreement
with
Real
Estate
Investment
Group
L.P.
(“REIG”),
pursuant
to
which
we
sold
5,700,000
common
shares
at
a
price
of
$2.50
per
share
to
REIG
for
gross
proceeds
of
$14,250.
We
also
granted
REIG
the
option
to
buy
up
to
an
additional
5,700,000
common
shares
at
a
price
of
$3.00
per
share,
which
was
exercisable
through
August
4,
2014.
On
February
13,
2012,
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
the
original
option,
we
called
in
and
canceled
the
option
granted
to
REIG
in
exchange
for
the
issuance
of
2,521,561
common
shares
with
an
aggregate
value
equal
to
$13,566.
This
amount
equals
the
volume
weighted
average
price
per
common
share
for
the
20
trading
days
prior
to
the
exercise
of
the
option,
less
the
$3.00
option
price,
multiplied
by
the
5,700,000
common
shares
remaining
under
the
option.
On
December
23,
2014,
we
amended
our
partnership
agreement
to
allow
for
the
issuance
of
profits
interests
in
HHLP
in
the
form
of
LTIP
Units,
a
new
class
of
limited
partnership
units
in
HHLP,
and
to
establish
the
terms
of
the
LTIP
Units.
The
LTIP
Units
vest
on
December
31
and
June
1
of
each
year,
beginning
on
December
31,
2014
and
ending
on
June
1,
2017.
The
LTIP
units
contain
restricted
stock
awards
that
were
forfeited
and
replaced
with
LTIP
unit
awards
with
similar
terms.
The
total
number
of
Restricted
Stock
Awards
forfeited
and
LTIP
Units
awarded
was
1,948,324.
Stock
Based
Compensation
We
measure
the
cost
of
employee
service
received
in
exchange
for
an
award
of
equity
instruments
based
on
the
grant-‐date
fair
value
of
the
award.
The
compensation
cost
is
amortized
on
a
straight
line
basis
over
the
period
during
which
an
employee
is
required
to
provide
service
in
exchange
for
the
award.
The
compensation
cost
related
to
performance
awards
that
are
contingent
upon
market
based
criteria
being
met
is
recorded
at
the
fair
value
of
the
award
on
the
date
of
the
grant
and
amortized
over
the
performance
period.
51
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Derivatives
and
Hedging
The
Company’s
objective
in
using
derivatives
is
to
add
stability
to
interest
expense
and
to
manage
its
exposure
to
interest
rate
movements.
To
accomplish
this
objective,
the
Company
primarily
uses
interest
rate
swaps
and
interest
rate
caps
as
part
of
its
cash
flow
hedging
strategy.
Interest
rate
swaps
designated
as
cash
flow
hedges
involve
the
receipt
of
variable-‐rate
amounts
in
exchange
for
fixed-‐rate
payments
over
the
life
of
the
agreements
without
exchange
of
the
underlying
principal
amount.
Interest
rate
caps
designated
as
cash
flow
hedges
limit
the
Company’s
exposure
to
increased
cash
payments
due
to
increases
in
variable
interest
rates.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize
revenue
and
expense
for
all
consolidated
hotels
as
hotel
operating
revenue
and
hotel
operating
expense
when
earned
and
incurred.
These
revenues
are
recorded
net
of
any
sales
or
occupancy
taxes
collected
from
our
guests.
We
participate
in
frequent
guest
programs
sponsored
by
the
brand
owners
of
our
hotels
and
we
expense
the
charges
associated
with
those
programs,
as
incurred.
Interest
income
on
development
loan
financing
is
recorded
in
the
period
earned
based
on
the
interest
rate
of
the
loan
and
outstanding
balance
during
the
period.
Development
loans
receivable
and
accrued
interest
on
the
development
loans
receivable
are
evaluated
to
determine
if
outstanding
balances
are
collectible.
Interest
is
recorded
only
if
it
is
determined
the
outstanding
loan
balance
and
accrued
interest
balance
are
collectible.
Other
revenues
consist
primarily
of
fees
earned
for
asset
management
services
provided
to
hotels
we
own
through
unconsolidated
joint
ventures.
Fees
are
earned
as
a
percentage
of
hotel
revenue
and
are
recorded
in
the
period
earned
to
the
extent
of
the
noncontrolling
interest
ownership.
Income
Taxes
The
Company
qualifies
as
a
REIT
under
applicable
provisions
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code,
as
amended,
and
intends
to
continue
to
qualify
as
a
REIT.
In
general,
under
such
provisions,
a
trust
which
has
made
the
required
election
and,
in
the
taxable
year,
meets
certain
requirements
and
distributes
to
its
shareholders
at
least
90%
of
its
REIT
taxable
income
will
not
be
subject
to
Federal
income
tax
to
the
extent
of
the
income
which
it
distributes.
Earnings
and
profits,
which
determine
the
taxability
of
dividends
to
shareholders,
differ
from
net
income
reported
for
financial
reporting
purposes
due
primarily
to
differences
in
depreciation
of
hotel
properties
for
Federal
income
tax
purposes.
Deferred
income
taxes
relate
primarily
to
the
TRS
Lessee
and
are
accounted
for
using
the
asset
and
liability
method.
Under
this
method,
deferred
income
taxes
are
recognized
for
temporary
differences
between
the
financial
reporting
bases
of
assets
and
liabilities
of
the
TRS
Lessee
and
their
respective
tax
bases
and
for
their
operating
loss
and
tax
credit
carry
forwards
based
on
enacted
tax
rates
expected
to
be
in
effect
when
such
amounts
are
realized
or
settled.
However,
deferred
tax
assets
are
recognized
only
to
the
extent
that
it
is
more
likely
than
not
that
they
will
be
realized
based
on
consideration
of
available
evidence,
including
tax
planning
strategies
and
other
factors.
The
Company
may
recognize
a
tax
benefit
from
an
uncertain
tax
position
when
it
is
more-‐likely-‐than-‐not
(defined
as
a
likelihood
of
more
than
50%)
that
the
position
will
be
sustained
upon
examination,
including
resolutions
of
any
related
appeals
or
litigation
processes,
based
on
the
technical
merits.
If
a
tax
position
does
not
meet
the
more-‐likely-‐than-‐not
recognition
threshold,
despite
the
Company’s
belief
that
its
filing
position
is
supportable,
the
benefit
of
that
tax
position
is
not
recognized
in
the
statements
of
operations.
The
Company
recognizes
interest
and
penalties,
as
applicable,
related
to
unrecognized
tax
benefits
as
a
component
of
income
tax
expense.
The
Company
recognizes
unrecognized
tax
benefits
in
the
period
that
the
uncertainty
is
eliminated
by
either
affirmative
agreement
of
the
uncertain
tax
position
by
the
applicable
taxing
authority,
or
by
expiration
of
the
applicable
52
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
1
–
ORGANIZATION
AND
SUMMARY
OF
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
statute
of
limitation.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012,
the
Company
did
not
record
any
uncertain
tax
positions.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
with
few
exceptions,
the
Company
is
subject
to
tax
examinations
by
U.S.
federal,
state,
and
local
income
tax
authorities
for
years
2003
through
2014.
Reclassification
Certain
amounts
in
the
prior
year
financial
statements
have
been
reclassified
to
conform
to
the
current
year
presentation.
New
Accounting
Pronouncements
On
May
28,
2014,
the
FASB
issued
ASU
No.
2014-‐09,
Revenue
from
Contracts
with
Customers,
which
requires
an
entity
to
recognize
the
amount
of
revenue
to
which
it
expects
to
be
entitled
for
the
transfer
of
promised
goods
or
services
to
customers.
The
ASU
will
replace
most
existing
revenue
recognition
guidance
in
U.S.
GAAP
when
it
becomes
effective.
The
new
standard
is
effective
for
the
Company
on
January
1,
2017.
Early
adoption
is
not
permitted.
The
standard
permits
the
use
of
either
the
retrospective
or
cumulative
effect
transition
method.
The
Company
is
evaluating
the
effect
that
ASU
No.
2014-‐09
will
have
on
its
consolidated
financial
statements
and
related
disclosures.
The
Company
has
not
yet
selected
a
transition
method
nor
has
it
determined
the
effect
of
the
standard
on
its
ongoing
financial
reporting.
53
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
2
–
INVESTMENT
IN
HOTEL
PROPERTIES
Investment
in
hotel
properties
consists
of
the
following
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
Land
Buildings
and
Improvements
Furniture,
Fixtures
and
Equipment
Construction
in
Progress
$
Less
Accumulated
Depreciation
$
439,540
1,424,842
203,275
-‐
2,067,657
(322,174)
339,027
1,222,639
171,116
63,168
1,795,950
(260,115)
Total
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties
$
1,745,483
$
1,535,835
Depreciation
expense
was
$68,418,
$61,500
and
$55,956
(including
depreciation
on
assets
held
for
sale)
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
acquired
the
following
wholly-‐owned
hotel
properties:
Hotel
Acquisition
Date
Land
Buildings
and
Improvements
Furniture
Fixtures
and
Equipment
Ground
Lease
Intangible
Franchise
Fees
and
Loan
Costs
Total
Purchase
Price
Assumption
of
Debt
Hotel
Milo,
Santa
Barbara,
CA
Parrot
Key
Resort,
Key
West,
FL
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
2/28/2014
$
-‐
$
55,080
$
805
$
(14,230)
$
273
$
41,928
$
24,924
5/7/2014
57,889
33,959
8,152
-‐
-‐
100,000
1,123
112,285
1,396
$
254,213
$
-
-‐
24,924
TOTAL
$
103,369
$
149,801
$
13,877
$
(14,230)
$
5/27/2014
45,480
60,762
4,920
-‐
Acquisition-‐related
cost,
such
as
due
diligence,
legal
and
accounting
fees,
are
not
capitalized
or
applied
in
determining
the
fair
value
of
the
above
acquired
assets.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014,
we
paid
$2,178
in
acquisition
costs
related
to
the
above
acquired
assets.
The
purchase
agreement
for
the
acquisition
of
the
Parrot
Key
Resort
in
Key
West,
FL,
contains
a
provision
that
entitles
the
seller
to
additional
consideration
of
$2,000
contingent
upon
the
hotel
achieving
certain
net
operating
income
thresholds
within
twelve
months
of
acquisition.
At
the
time
of
acquisition,
no
liability
was
recorded
as
the
fair
market
value
of
the
contingent
consideration
was
determined
to
be
$0.
Upon
remeasurement
at
December
31,
2014,
a
liability
was
recorded
as
the
fair
market
value
of
the
contingent
consideration
was
determined
to
be
$2,000.
On
May
27,
2014,
we
completed
the
acquisition
of
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street
hotel
in
New
York,
NY
from
an
unaffiliated
seller.
Previously,
we
had
entered
into
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
to
acquire
this
property
for
total
consideration
of
$84,000.
The
purchase
price
for
this
property
was
contractually
fixed
on
August
23,
2012,
the
date
we
entered
into
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
During
the
21-‐month
period
of
time
between
entering
in
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
on
August
23,
2012
and
the
closing
date,
the
real
estate
market
for
hotels
located
in
Manhattan
experienced
significant
price
appreciation
due
to
improved
economic
conditions
in
the
market
and
in
the
overall
economy.
This
resulted
in
an
increase
in
the
fair
value
of
the
property
at
the
time
of
closing
the
acquisition
and,
as
such,
we
recognized
a
gain
of
approximately
$13,594,
which
is
net
of
preopening
expenses
of
$927
on
the
statement
of
operations,
as
the
fair
value
of
the
asset
acquired
less
any
liabilities
assumed
exceeded
the
consideration
transferred.
54
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
2
–
INVESTMENT
IN
HOTEL
PROPERTIES
(CONTINUED)
Consideration
given
in
exchange
for
the
property
included
$27,500
paid
in
cash
to
the
seller
and
our
reinstatement
and
cancellation
of
a
development
loan
receivable
in
the
original
principal
amount
of
$10,000
and
$12,494
of
accrued
interest
and
late
fees.
This
development
loan
receivable
had
previously
been
fully
impaired
in
2009,
but
was
recovered
as
part
of
this
acquisition.
As
a
result,
we
recognized
a
gain
of
$22,494
on
the
recovery
of
the
previously
impaired
development
loan.
In
addition,
we
paid
off
the
existing
construction
financing
and
entered
into
a
new
mortgage
loan
of
$45,000.
Concurrent
with
our
entry
into
the
new
mortgage
loan,
we
entered
into
an
interest
rate
cap
and
swap
–
see
“Note
7
–
Fair
Measurements
and
Derivative
Instruments”
for
more
information
on
this
derivative.
No
other
consideration
was
exchanged
in
connection
with
the
acquisition
of
this
property.
Below
is
a
tabular
reference
to
illustrate
the
components
of
the
consideration
and
fair
value
of
the
property:
Hotel
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
Initial
Purchase
Price
Interest
and
Late
Fees
on
Development
Loan
Non-‐Cash
Fair
Market
Value
Gain
on
Acquisition
Fair
Market
Value
At
Acquisition
Franchise
Fees
and
Loan
Costs
Asset
Value
Upon
Acquisition
Other
$
84,000
$
12,494
$
13,594
$
1,074
$
111,162
$
1,123
$
112,285
Included
in
the
consolidated
statement
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014
are
total
revenues
of
$28,239
and
a
total
net
income
of
$6,219
for
hotels
we
have
acquired
and
consolidated
since
the
date
of
acquisition.
These
amounts
represent
the
results
of
operations
for
these
hotels
since
the
date
of
acquisition:
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
Hotel
Revenue
Hotel
Milo,
Santa
Barbara,
CA
Parrot
Key
Resort,
Key
West,
FL
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
Total
$
$
8,655
$
9,145
10,439
28,239
$
Net
Income
668
2,978
2,573
6,219
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
we
acquired
the
following
wholly-‐owned
hotel
properties:
Hotel
Hyatt
Union
Square,
New
York,
NY*
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
San
Diego,
CA
Residence
Inn,
Coconut
Grove,
FL
Blue
Moon,
Miami
Beach,
FL
Winter
Haven,
Miami
Beach,
FL
Acquisition
Date
Land
Buildings
and
Improvements
Furniture
Fixtures
and
Equipment
Franchise
Fees
and
Loan
Costs
Total
Purchase
Price
4/9/2013
$
32,940
$
79,300
$
9,760
$
1,945
$
5/30/2013
15,656
51,674
3,671
183
123,945
71,184
6/12/2013
4,146
17,456
218
75
21,895
12/20/2013
4,874
20,354
1,125
12/20/2013
5,400
18,147
1,050
-‐
-‐
Total
$
63,016
$
186,931
$
15,824
$
2,203
$
26,353
24,597
267,974
55
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
2
–
INVESTMENT
IN
HOTEL
PROPERTIES
(CONTINUED)
On
April
9,
2013,
we
completed
the
acquisition
of
the
Hyatt
Union
Square
hotel
in
New
York,
NY
from
*
Risingsam
Union
Square
LLC.
Consideration
given
in
exchange
for
the
property
included
$36,000
paid
in
cash
to
the
seller
and
our
cancellation
of
a
development
loan
receivable
in
the
original
principal
amount
of
$10,000
and
$3,303
of
accrued
interest
on
the
loan.
In
addition,
we
paid
off
the
existing
construction
financing
and
entered
into
a
new
mortgage
loan
of
$55,000.
We
recognized
a
net
gain
of
approximately
$12,108
on
the
purchase
of
the
Hyatt
Union
Square
hotel
as
the
fair
value
of
the
assets
acquired
less
any
liabilities
assumed
exceeded
the
consideration
transferred.
During
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013,
we
paid
$855
in
acquisition
costs
related
to
the
above
acquired
assets.
As
shown
in
the
table
below,
included
in
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
are
total
revenues
of
$22,889
and
a
total
net
income
of
$1,412
for
hotels
we
have
acquired
and
consolidated
since
the
date
of
acquisition.
These
amounts
represent
the
results
of
operations
for
these
hotels
since
the
date
of
acquisition:
Hotel
Hyatt
Union
Square,
New
York,
NY
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
San
Diego,
CA
Residence
Inn,
Coconut
Grove,
FL
Blue
Moon,
Miami
Beach,
FL
Winter
Haven,
Miami
Beach,
FL
$
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
Revenue
Net
(Loss)
Income
$
11,272
8,350
2,889
175
203
(1,466)
1,914
713
111
140
Total
$
22,889
$
1,412
Pro
Forma
Results
(Unaudited)
The
following
condensed
pro
forma
financial
data
are
presented
as
if
all
acquisitions
completed
since
January
1,
2014
and
2013
had
been
completed
on
January
1,
2013
and
2012.
Properties
acquired
without
any
operating
history
are
excluded
from
the
condensed
pro
forma
operating
results.
The
condensed
pro
forma
financial
data
is
not
necessarily
indicative
of
what
actual
results
of
operations
of
the
Company
would
have
been
assuming
the
acquisitions
had
been
consummated
on
January
1,
2014
and
2013
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
presented,
nor
do
they
purport
to
represent
the
results
of
operations
for
future
periods.
Pro
Forma
Total
Revenues
Pro
Forma
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
Pro
Forma
Net
Income
Income
(Loss)
Allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interest
Preferred
Distributions
Extinguishment
of
Issuance
Costs
Upon
Redemption
of
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
Pro
Forma
Net
Income
(Loss)
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Pro
Forma
Income
Applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
per
Common
Share
Basic
Diluted
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
Basic
Diluted
56
$
$
$
$
$
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
425,029
$
376,767
72,864
(1,665)
71,199
(1,016)
(14,356)
-‐
55,827
$
$
0.28
0.28
$
$
27,859
29,195
57,054
(335)
(14,611)
(2,250)
39,858
0.20
0.20
199,109,209
201,197,310
198,390,450
201,918,177
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
2
–
INVESTMENT
IN
HOTEL
PROPERTIES
(CONTINUED)
Asset
Development
and
Renovation
The
Company
has
opportunistically
engaged
in
the
development
of
hotel
assets.
On
July
22,
2011,
the
Company
completed
the
acquisition
of
the
real
property
and
improvements
located
at
32
Pearl
Street,
New
York,
NY,
from
an
unaffiliated
seller
for
a
total
purchase
price
of
$28,300.
On
June
23,
2014,
this
property
opened
as
a
Hampton
Inn.
The
total
construction
costs
spent
on
this
property
since
acquisition
were
$9,564,
which
equates
to
a
total
carrying
value
of
approximately
$37,864
when
the
property
opened.
In
January
2014,
the
Company
completed
the
construction
of
an
additional
oceanfront
tower,
additional
meeting
space
and
structured
parking
on
a
land
parcel
adjacent
to
the
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
Miami,
FL,
a
hotel
acquired
on
November
16,
2011.
This
land
parcel
was
included
in
the
acquisition
of
the
hotel.
We
capitalize
expenditures
related
to
hotel
development
projects
and
renovations,
including
indirect
costs
such
as
interest
expense,
real
estate
taxes
and
utilities
related
to
hotel
development
projects
and
renovations.
We
have
capitalized
the
following
indirect
development
costs
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012:
2014
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
2012
Property
Tax
Interest
Expense
Utilities
Total
$
$
223
458
73
754
$
$
388
1,320
3
1,711
$
$
296
1,542
9
1,847
During
the
second
quarter
of
2014,
we
finalized
our
settlement
of
the
insurance
claim
we
had
for
losses
incurred
as
a
result
of
Hurricane
Sandy.
In
October
2012,
Hurricane
Sandy
affected
numerous
hotels
within
our
portfolio.
Two
hotels
within
our
portfolio
were
significantly
impacted
by
this
natural
disaster;
one
hotel
was
inoperable
(Holiday
Inn
Express
Water
Street,
New
York,
NY)
and
one
hotel
development
project,
which
was
subsequently
completed
on
June
23,
2014,
incurred
delays
in
construction
(Hampton
Inn,
Pearl
Street,
New
York,
NY).
Prior
to
March
31,
2014,
we
had
recorded
estimated
property
losses
of
$1,586
on
the
Holiday
Inn
Express
Water
Street
and
a
corresponding
insurance
claim
receivable
of
$1,486.
This
hotel
reopened
in
April
2013.
We
also
had
recorded
estimated
property
losses
of
$1,997
on
the
Hampton
Inn
Pearl
Street
and
a
corresponding
insurance
claim
receivable
of
$1,897.
This
hotel
opened
in
June
2014.
As
a
result
of
the
claim
settlement,
we
recorded
a
gain
on
insurance
settlements
of
approximately
$4,604,
which
included
business
interruption
claims.
57
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
3
–
INVESTMENT
IN
UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT
VENTURES
As
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
our
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
consisted
of
the
following:
Joint
Venture
Hotel
Properties
Owned
Return
2014
2013
Percent
Preferred
December
31,
December
31,
SB
Partners,
LLC
Holiday
Inn
Express,
South
Boston,
MA
Hiren
Boston,
LLC
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
South
Boston,
MA
50.0%
N/A
$
913
$
1,057
50.0%
N/A
4,680
4,777
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
Hilton
and
Marriott
branded
hotels
in
CT
8.8%-‐66.7%
8.5%
non-‐cumulative
$
5,556
11,150
$
6,210
12,044
In
2013,
we
recorded
an
impairment
loss
of
$1,813
related
to
the
Courtyard,
Norwich,
CT,
one
of
the
properties
owned
by
Mystic
Partners,
LLC.
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
transferred
the
title
to
the
property
to
the
lender
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
As
we
did
not
anticipate
recovering
our
investment
balance
in
this
asset,
we
reduced
the
portion
of
our
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
investment
related
to
this
property
to
$0
as
of
December
31,
2013.
On
February
1,
2013,
the
Company
closed
on
the
sale
of
its
interest
in
one
of
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture
properties
owned
in
part
by
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
to
its
joint
venture
partner.
As
our
investment
in
this
unconsolidated
joint
venture
equated
the
net
proceeds
distributed
to
us,
we
did
not
record
a
gain
or
loss
in
connection
with
the
sale
of
this
hotel.
As
noted
in
“Note
2
–
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties,”
on
August
13,
2012,
the
Company
purchased
the
remaining
50%
ownership
interest
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing,
the
lessee
of
the
Courtyard
by
Marriot,
Ewing,
NJ.
As
such,
we
ceased
to
account
for
our
investment
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing
under
the
equity
method
of
accounting
as
of
August
13,
2012
because
it
became
a
consolidated
subsidiary.
Our
interest
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing,
which
consisted
of
our
investment
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing
and
a
receivable,
was
remeasured
and
as
a
result
based
on
the
appraised
value
of
the
hotel,
we
recorded
a
loss
of
approximately
$1,668
during
the
twelve
months
ended
December
31,
2012.
As
noted
in
“Note
2
–
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties,”
on
June
18,
2012,
the
Company
purchased
the
remaining
50%
ownership
interest
in
Metro
29th,
the
lessee
of
the
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Manhattan,
New
York,
NY.
As
such,
we
ceased
to
account
for
our
investment
in
Metro
29th
under
the
equity
method
of
accounting
as
of
June
18,
2012
because
it
became
a
consolidated
subsidiary.
Our
interest
in
Metro
29th
was
remeasured,
and
as
a
result,
we
recorded
a
loss
of
approximately
$224.
Fair
value
for
our
previously
held
investments
in
Inn
America
Hospitality
at
Ewing
and
Metro
29th
was
determined
through
the
use
of
an
income
approach
and
was
measured
using
Level
3
inputs.
The
income
approach
estimates
an
income
stream
for
a
hotel
property
(typically
5
years)
and
discounts
this
income
plus
a
reversion
(presumed
sale)
into
a
present
value
at
a
risk
adjusted
rate.
RevPAR
growth
assumptions
utilized
in
this
approach
are
derived
from
market
transactions
as
well
as
other
financial
and
industry
data.
The
terminal
cap
rate
and
discount
rate
are
significant
inputs
to
this
valuation.
The
fair
value
measurements
determined
during
the
year
included
RevPAR
growth
assumptions
ranging
between
3%
and
8%,
terminal
cap
rates
ranging
between
8.5%
and
9.5%,
and
a
discount
rate
of
10.5%.
Changes
in
these
inputs
could
result
in
a
significant
change
in
the
valuation
of
our
original
joint
venture
investments
and
a
change
in
the
loss
from
remeasurement
of
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
venture
recognized
during
the
period.
58
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
3
–
INVESTMENT
IN
UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT
VENTURES
(CONTINUED)
On
February
23,
2012,
the
Company
closed
on
the
sale
of
14
non-‐core
hotel
properties,
including
three
of
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture
hotel
properties.
On
May
8,
2012,
the
Company
closed
on
the
remaining
four
non-‐core
hotel
properties,
including
one
of
the
unconsolidated
joint
venture
hotel
properties.
As
our
investment
in
these
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
equated
the
net
proceeds
distributed
to
us,
we
did
not
record
a
gain
or
loss
in
connection
with
the
sale
of
these
hotel
properties.
See
“Note
11
–
Hotel
Dispositions”
for
more
information.
Income
or
loss
from
our
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
is
allocated
to
us
and
our
joint
venture
partners
consistent
with
the
allocation
of
cash
distributions
in
accordance
with
the
joint
venture
agreements.
Any
difference
between
the
carrying
amount
of
these
investments
and
the
underlying
equity
in
net
assets
is
amortized
over
the
expected
useful
lives
of
the
properties
and
other
intangible
assets.
Income
(loss)
recognized
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
for
our
investments
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
is
as
follows:
SB
Partners,
LLC
Hiren
Boston,
LLC
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
Metro
29th
Street
Associates,
LLC
$
Income
(Loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
Impairment
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Loss
from
Remeasurement
of
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
Income
(Loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
2014
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
2012
407
$
603
(317)
-‐
264
$
113
(399)
-‐
693
(22)
85
230
(433)
(114)
(232)
-‐
(1,813)
-‐
-‐
-‐
(1,892)
$
693
$
(1,835)
$
(2,124)
The
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
joint
venture
agreement
provides
for
an
8.5%
non-‐cumulative
preferred
return
based
on
our
contributed
equity
interest
in
the
venture.
Cash
distributions
will
be
made
from
cash
available
for
distribution,
first,
to
us
to
provide
an
8.5%
annual
non-‐compounded
return
on
our
unreturned
capital
contributions
and
then
to
our
joint
venture
partner
to
provide
an
8.5%
annual
non-‐compounded
return
of
their
unreturned
contributions.
Any
remaining
cash
available
for
distribution
will
be
distributed
to
us
10.5%
with
respect
to
the
net
cash
flow
from
the
Hartford
Marriott,
7.0%
with
respect
to
the
Hartford
Hilton
and
56.7%,
with
respect
to
the
remaining
property.
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
allocates
income
to
us
and
our
joint
venture
partner
consistent
with
the
allocation
of
cash
distributions
in
accordance
with
the
joint
venture
agreements.
Each
of
the
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
hotel
properties,
except
the
Hartford
Hilton,
is
under
an
Asset
Management
Agreement
with
44
New
England
to
provide
asset
management
services.
Fees
for
these
services
are
paid
monthly
to
44
New
England
and
recognized
as
income
in
the
amount
of
1%
of
operating
revenues,
except
for
the
Hartford
Marriott
which
is
0.25%
of
operating
revenues.
The
Company
and
our
joint
venture
partner
in
Mystic
Partners,
LLC
jointly
and
severally
guarantee
the
performance
of
the
terms
of
a
loan
to
Adriaen’s
Landing
Hotel,
LLC,
owner
of
the
Hartford
Marriott,
in
the
amount
of
$50,000,
and
315
Trumbull
Street
Associates,
LLC,
owner
of
the
Hartford
Hilton,
in
the
amount
of
$27,000,
if
at
any
time
during
the
term
of
the
note
and
during
such
time
as
the
net
worth
of
Mystic
Partners
falls
below
the
amount
of
the
guarantee.
We
have
determined
that
the
probability
of
incurring
loss
under
this
guarantee
is
remote
and
the
value
attributed
to
the
guarantee
is
de
minimis.
59
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
3
–
INVESTMENT
IN
UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT
VENTURES
(CONTINUED)
The
following
tables
set
forth
the
total
assets,
liabilities,
equity
and
components
of
net
income
or
loss,
including
the
Company’s
share,
related
to
the
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
discussed
above
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
and
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012.
Balance
Sheets
Assets
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties,
Net
Other
Assets
Total
Assets
Liabilities
and
Equity
Mortgages
and
Notes
Payable
Other
Liabilities
Equity:
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
Joint
Venture
Partner(s)
Total
Equity
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
$
$
$
106,430
$
19,032
125,462
$
115,446
$
30,832
23,060
(43,876)
(20,816)
114,221
19,146
133,367
112,654
37,464
26,230
(42,981)
(16,751)
Total
Liabilities
and
Equity
$
125,462
$
133,367
Statements
of
Operations
Room
Revenue
Other
Revenue
Operating
Expenses
Lease
Expense
Property
Taxes
and
Insurance
General
and
Administrative
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Interest
Expense
Debt
Extinguishment
and
Gain
on
Debt
Forgiveness
Gain
(Loss)
allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Net
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
(Loss)
Income
from
Discontinued
Operations
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Hotel
Properties
$
2014
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
2012
59,135
$
21,725
(54,831)
(1,063)
(2,934)
(5,783)
(6,376)
(11,995)
58,273
$
22,606
(55,179)
(996)
(3,034)
(5,794)
(6,697)
(7,526)
62,058
22,306
(57,131)
(3,729)
(3,438)
(5,904)
(6,533)
(7,650)
3,016
-‐
-‐
115
(179)
(2,614)
1,009
1,474
(2,635)
-‐
-‐
(55)
1,161
121
25,131
Net
Income
$
1,009
$
2,580
$
22,617
60
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
3
–
INVESTMENT
IN
UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT
VENTURES
(CONTINUED)
The
following
table
is
a
reconciliation
of
the
Company’s
share
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
ventures’
equity
to
the
Company’s
investment
in
the
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
as
presented
on
the
Company’s
balance
sheets
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
Company's
share
of
equity
recorded
on
the
joint
ventures'
financial
statements
$
Adjustment
to
reconcile
the
Company's
share
of
equity
recorded
on
the
joint
ventures'
financial
statements
to
our
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures(1)
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
23,060
$
26,230
(11,910)
(14,186)
12,044
Investment
in
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
$
11,150
$
(1)
Adjustment
to
reconcile
the
Company's
share
of
equity
recorded
on
the
joint
ventures'
financial
statements
to
our
investment
in
unconsolidated
joint
ventures
consists
of
the
following:
•
•
•
cumulative
impairment
of
the
Company’s
investment
in
joint
ventures
not
reflected
on
the
joint
ventures'
financial
statements;
the
Company’s
basis
in
the
investment
in
joint
ventures
not
recorded
on
the
joint
ventures'
financial
statements;
and
accumulated
amortization
of
the
Company’s
equity
in
joint
ventures
that
reflects
the
Company’s
portion
of
the
excess
of
the
fair
value
of
joint
ventures'
assets
on
the
date
of
our
investment
over
the
carrying
value
of
the
assets
recorded
on
the
joint
ventures
financial
statements
(this
excess
investment
is
amortized
over
the
life
of
the
properties,
and
the
amortization
is
included
in
Income
(Loss)
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Venture
Investments
on
the
Company’s
consolidated
statement
of
operations).
61
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
4
–
OTHER
ASSETS
AND
DEPOSITS
ON
HOTEL
ACQUISITIONS
Other
Assets
Other
Assets
consisted
of
the
following
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013:
Transaction
Costs
Investment
in
Statutory
Trusts
Prepaid
Expenses
Insurance
Claims
Receivable
Deferred
Tax
Asset,
Net
of
Valuation
Allowance
of
$804
Other
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
$
$
-‐
1,548
7,883
64
11,448
7,483
28,426
$
$
115
1,548
9,256
1,706
8,766
6,069
27,460
Transaction
Costs
-‐
Transaction
costs
include
legal
fees
and
other
third
party
transaction
costs
incurred
relative
to
entering
into
debt
facilities,
issuances
of
equity
securities,
and
other
costs
which
are
recorded
in
other
assets
prior
to
the
closing
of
the
respective
transactions.
Investment
in
Statutory
Trusts
-‐
We
have
an
investment
in
the
common
stock
of
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
I
and
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
II.
Our
investment
is
accounted
for
under
the
equity
method.
Prepaid
Expenses
-‐
Prepaid
expenses
include
amounts
paid
for
property
tax,
insurance
and
other
expenditures
that
will
be
expensed
in
the
next
twelve
months.
Insurance
Claims
Receivable
–
As
noted
in
“Note
2
–
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties,”
we
recorded
an
insurance
claim
receivable
due
to
the
property
damage
that
occurred
at
several
of
our
hotel
properties
as
a
result
of
Hurricane
Sandy
in
October
2012.
This
claim
was
settled
in
June
2014,
and
we
received
our
final
claim
payment
in
July
2014
in
the
amount
of
$2,498.
The
remaining
balance
in
insurance
claims
receivable
as
of
December
31,
2014
is
comprised
of
claims
that
arose
from
property
damage
at
hotel
properties
as
a
result
of
other
events.
Deferred
Tax
Asset
-‐
We
have
approximately
$11,448
of
net
deferred
tax
assets
as
of
December
31,
2014.
We
have
considered
various
factors,
including
future
reversals
of
existing
taxable
temporary
differences,
future
projected
taxable
income
and
tax
planning
strategies
in
determining
a
valuation
allowance
for
our
deferred
tax
assets,
and
we
believe
that
it
is
more
likely
than
not
that
we
will
be
able
to
realize
the
$11,448
of
net
deferred
tax
assets
in
the
future.
Deposits
on
Hotel
Acquisitions
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
had
no
deposits
on
hotel
acquisitions.
As
of
December
31,
2013,
deposits
on
hotel
acquisitions
consisted
of
$15,486
in
interest
bearing
deposits
related
to
the
acquisition
of
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
and
$3,100
in
non-‐interest
bearing
deposits
related
to
the
acquisition
of
the
Hotel
Milo,
located
in
Santa
Barbara,
California.
The
acquisition
of
the
Hotel
Milo
closed
in
the
first
quarter
and
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street
closed
in
the
second
quarter
of
2014.
See
“Note
2
–
Investment
In
Hotel
Properties”
for
more
information.
62
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
5
–
DEBT
Mortgages
We
had
total
mortgages
payable
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
of
$617,375
and
$617,788
(including
$45,835
in
outstanding
mortgage
indebtedness
related
to
assets
held
for
sale
at
December
31,
2013),
respectively.
These
balances
consisted
of
mortgages
with
fixed
and
variable
interest
rates,
which
ranged
from
2.47%
to
6.50%
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Included
in
these
balances
are
net
premiums
of
$1,584
and
$2,466
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively,
which
are
amortized
over
the
remaining
life
of
the
loans.
Aggregate
interest
expense
incurred
under
the
mortgage
loans
payable
totaled
$31,046,
$34,854,
and
$38,343
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
Our
mortgage
indebtedness
contains
various
financial
and
non-‐financial
covenants
customarily
found
in
secured,
non-‐recourse
financing
arrangements.
Our
mortgage
loans
payable
typically
require
that
specified
debt
service
coverage
ratios
be
maintained
with
respect
to
the
financed
properties
before
we
can
exercise
certain
rights
under
the
loan
agreements
relating
to
such
properties.
If
the
specified
criteria
are
not
satisfied,
the
lender
may
be
able
to
escrow
cash
flow
generated
by
the
property
securing
the
applicable
mortgage
loan.
We
have
determined
that
certain
debt
service
coverage
ratio
covenants
contained
in
the
loan
agreements
securing
four
of
our
hotel
properties
were
not
met
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Pursuant
to
these
loan
agreements,
the
lender
has
elected
to
escrow
the
operating
cash
flow
for
a
number
of
these
properties.
However,
these
covenants
do
not
constitute
an
event
of
default
for
these
loans.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
maturity
dates
for
the
outstanding
mortgage
loans
ranged
from
January
2015
to
April
2023.
Subordinated
Notes
Payable
We
have
two
junior
subordinated
notes
payable
in
the
aggregate
amount
of
$51,548
to
the
Hersha
Statutory
Trusts
pursuant
to
indenture
agreements
which
will
mature
on
July
30,
2035,
but
may
be
redeemed
at
our
option,
in
whole
or
in
part,
prior
to
maturity
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
the
indenture
agreements.
The
$25,774
notes
issued
to
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
I
and
Hersha
Statutory
Trust
II,
bear
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
LIBOR
plus
3%
per
annum.
This
rate
resets
two
business
days
prior
to
each
quarterly
payment.
The
weighted
average
interest
rate
on
our
two
junior
subordinated
notes
payable
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
was
3.28%,
3.32%,
and
3.51%,
respectively.
Interest
expense
in
the
amount
of
$1,690,
$1,712,
and
$1,810
was
recorded
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
Credit
Facilities
On
February
28,
2014,
we
entered
into
a
senior
unsecured
credit
agreement
with
Citigroup
Global
Markets
Inc.
and
various
other
lenders.
The
credit
agreement
provides
for
a
$500,000
senior
unsecured
credit
facility
consisting
of
a
$250,000
senior
unsecured
revolving
line
of
credit
and
a
$250,000
senior
unsecured
term
loan.
This
new
facility
amended
and
restated
the
existing
$400,000
senior
unsecured
credit
facility.
The
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
expires
on
February
28,
2018
and,
provided
no
event
of
default
has
occurred,
we
may
request
that
the
lenders
renew
the
credit
facility
for
an
additional
one-‐year
period.
The
credit
facility
is
also
expandable
to
$850,000
at
our
request,
subject
to
the
satisfaction
of
certain
conditions.
Prior
to
February
28,
2014,
we
maintained
a
senior
unsecured
credit
agreement
with
Citigroup
Global
Markets
Inc.
and
various
other
lenders.
The
credit
agreement
provided
for
a
$400,000
senior
unsecured
credit
facility
consisting
of
a
$250,000
senior
unsecured
revolving
line
of
credit
and
a
$150,000
senior
unsecured
term
loan.
63
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
5
–
DEBT
(CONTINUED)
The
amount
that
we
can
borrow
at
any
given
time
on
our
credit
facility
is
governed
by
certain
operating
metrics
of
designated
unencumbered
hotel
properties
known
as
borrowing
base
assets.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
following
hotel
properties
were
borrowing
base
assets:
-‐
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Cambridge,
MA
-‐
Hampton
Inn,
Philadelphia,
PA
-‐
Holiday
Inn,
Wall
Street,
NY
-‐
Hampton
Inn,
Washington,
DC
-‐
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Times
Square,
NY
-‐
Hyatt
Place,
King
of
Prussia,
PA
-‐
Residence
Inn,
Norwood,
MA
-‐
Nu
Hotel,
Brooklyn,
NY
-‐
Residence
Inn,
Framingham,
MA
-‐
The
Rittenhouse
Hotel,
Philadelphia,
PA
-‐
Sheraton,
Wilmington
South,
DE
-‐
The
Boxer,
Boston,
MA
-‐
Sheraton
Hotel,
JFK
Airport,
New
York,
NY
-‐
Holiday
Inn
Express
(Water
Street),
New
York,
NY
-‐
Candlewood
Suites,
Times
Square,
NY
-‐
Courtyard,
San
Diego,
CA
-‐
Hampton
Inn,
Times
Square,
NY
-‐
Residence
Inn,
Coconut
Grove,
FL
-‐
Winter
Haven,
Miami,
FL
-‐
Hampton
Inn,
Pearl
Street,
NY
-‐
Residence
Inn,
Greenbelt,
MD
-‐
Blue
Moon,
Miami,
FL
-‐
Parrot
Key
Resort,
Key
West,
FL
The
interest
rate
for
the
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
is
based
on
a
pricing
grid
with
a
range
of
one
month
U.S.
LIBOR
plus
1.70%
to
2.45%
for
the
revolving
line
of
credit
and
1.60%
to
2.35%
for
the
unsecured
term
loan.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
had
borrowed
$250,000
in
unsecured
term
loans
under
the
unsecured
credit
facility,
$150,000
for
which
we
had
entered
into
interest
rate
swaps
which
effectively
fix
the
interest
rate
on
these
term
loans
at
a
blended
rate
of
3.217%.
See
“Note
7
–
Fair
Value
Measurements
and
Derivative
Instruments”
for
more
information.
The
credit
agreement
providing
for
the
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
includes
certain
financial
covenants
and
requires
that
we
maintain:
(1)
a
minimum
tangible
net
worth
of
$803,711,
which
is
calculated
by
adding
back
accumulated
depreciation
to
the
recorded
value
of
our
investment
in
hotel
properties
and
subtracting
certain
intangible
assets
and
debt
and
is
subject
to
increases
under
certain
circumstances;
(2)
annual
distributions
not
to
exceed
95%
of
adjusted
funds
from
operations;
and
(3)
certain
financial
ratios,
including
the
following:
·∙
·∙
·∙
a
fixed
charge
coverage
ratio
of
not
less
than
1.45
to
1.00,
which
increases
to
1.50
to
1.00
as
of
January
1,
2016;
a
maximum
leverage
ratio
of
not
more
than
60%;
and
a
maximum
secured
debt
leverage
ratio
of
50%,
which
decreases
to
45%
as
of
January
1,
2016
The
Company
is
in
compliance
with
each
of
the
covenants
listed
above
as
of
December
31,
2014.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
our
remaining
borrowing
capacity
under
the
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
was
$245,745,
based
on
the
borrowing
base
assets
at
December
31,
2014.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
outstanding
unsecured
term
loan
balance
under
the
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
was
$250,000
and
we
had
outstanding
borrowings
of
$0
on
the
revolving
line
of
credit.
As
of
December
31,
2013,
the
outstanding
unsecured
term
loan
under
the
prior
$400,000
unsecured
credit
facility
was
$150,000
and
64
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
5
–
DEBT
(CONTINUED)
the
revolving
line
of
credit
had
no
balance
outstanding.
The
Company
recorded
interest
expense
of
$6,218,
$5,413,
and
$2,405
related
to
borrowings
drawn
on
each
of
the
aforementioned
credit
facilities,
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
The
weighted
average
interest
rate
on
our
credit
facilities
was
2.82%,
3.08%,
and
4.57%
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
Aggregate
annual
principal
payments
for
the
Company’s
credit
facility
and
mortgages
and
subordinated
notes
payable
for
the
five
years
following
December
31,
2015
and
thereafter
are
as
follows:
Year
Ending
December
31,
Amount
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
Net
Unamortized
Premium
Capitalized
Interest
$
$
69,063
273,824
204,219
1,564
294,892
73,777
1,584
918,923
We
utilize
mortgage
debt
and
our
$500,000
revolving
credit
facility
to
finance
on-‐going
capital
improvement
projects
at
our
hotels.
Interest
incurred
on
mortgages
and
the
revolving
credit
facility
that
relates
to
our
capital
improvement
projects
is
capitalized
through
the
date
when
the
assets
are
placed
in
service.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
we
capitalized
$458,
$1,320,
and
$1,542
respectively,
of
interest
expense
related
to
these
projects.
Deferred
Financing
Costs
Costs
associated
with
entering
into
mortgages
and
notes
payable
and
our
revolving
line
of
credit
are
deferred
and
amortized
over
the
life
of
the
debt
instruments.
Amortization
of
deferred
financing
costs
is
recorded
in
interest
expense.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
deferred
costs
were
$8,605,
net
of
accumulated
amortization
of
$6,938.
Amortization
of
deferred
costs
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
was
$2,768,
$2,886,
and
$2,991
respectively.
Debt
Payoff
On
October
27,
2014,
we
repaid
$10,179
on
our
mortgage
with
Berkadia
Commercial
Mortgage,
LLC
for
the
Residence
Inn,
Greenbelt,
MD
property.
The
loan
was
due
to
mature
in
October
2014,
and
we
incurred
no
loss
on
debt
extinguishment
in
paying
off
the
loan.
On
June
30,
2013,
we
repaid
$7,928
on
our
mortgage
with
Berkadia
Commercial
Mortgage,
LLC
for
the
Residence
Inn,
Tysons
Corner,
VA
property.
The
loan
was
due
to
mature
in
July
2013,
and
we
incurred
no
loss
on
debt
extinguishment
in
paying
off
the
loan.
On
January
3,
2013,
we
funded
an
additional
$50,000
in
unsecured
term
loan
borrowings
under
our
then
$400,000
unsecured
credit
facility
which
was
used
to
pay
off
the
balance
of
the
mortgage
loan
secured
by
the
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Times
Square,
New
York,
NY
on
January
7,
2013.
This
mortgage
was
also
subject
to
an
interest
rate
swap,
65
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
5
–
DEBT
(CONTINUED)
which
was
terminated
as
a
cash
flow
hedge
as
of
December
31,
2012
due
to
this
payoff.
As
a
result
of
this
payoff,
we
expensed
$261
in
unamortized
deferred
financing
costs
and
fees,
which
are
included
in
the
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
caption
of
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013.
Due
to
the
timing
of
this
transaction,
the
hedge
relationship
on
our
interest
rate
swap
was
derecognized
as
of
December
31,
2012.
Therefore,
the
accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
on
this
swap
as
of
December
31,
2012,
was
reclassified
to
income
and
we
recorded
$530
in
the
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
on
the
statement
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
As
previously
mentioned,
we
replaced
our
previous
$250,000
secured
credit
facility
with
a
new
$400,000
unsecured
credit
facility
with
Citigroup
Global
Markets
Inc.
and
various
other
lenders
on
November
5,
2012.
Concurrently
with
this
closing,
we
funded
$100,000
in
unsecured
term
loan
borrowings.
These
borrowings
were
used
to
pay
off
in
full
the
balance
on
seven
mortgage
loans
on
hotel
properties.
As
a
result
of
terminating
our
previous
$250,000
secured
credit
facility
and
extinguishing
the
debt
on
these
seven
properties,
we
expensed
$2,410
in
unamortized
deferred
financing
costs
and
fees,
which
are
included
in
the
Loss
of
Debt
Extinguishment
caption
on
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
New
Debt/Refinance
On
November
13,
2014,
we
repaid
outstanding
mortgage
debt
on
with
an
original
principal
balance
of
$32,000
secured
by
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
Tribeca,
NY
and
simultaneously
entered
into
a
new
mortgage
obligation
of
$46,500
with
a
new
lender.
The
new
mortgage
debt
bears
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
one
month
U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
plus
2.30%
and
matures
on
November
1,
2019.
As
previously
mentioned,
we
refinanced
our
previous
$400,000
unsecured
credit
facility
with
a
$500,000
unsecured
credit
facility
with
Citigroup
Global
Markets
Inc.
and
various
other
lenders
on
February
28,
2014.
As
a
result
of
this
refinance,
we
expensed
$579
in
unamortized
deferred
financing
costs
and
fees,
which
are
included
in
the
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
caption
of
the
consolidated
statements
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
On
January,
31,
2014,
we
paid
down
$5,175
of
the
outstanding
debt
and
modified
the
mortgage
loan
on
the
Duane
Street
Hotel,
New
York,
NY.
As
a
result,
we
entered
into
a
$9,500
loan
with
a
maturity
date
of
February
1,
2017.
The
modified
loan
bears
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
one
month
U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
plus
4.50%.
The
modification
also
includes
an
interest
rate
swap,
which
effectively
fixes
the
interest
rate
at
5.433%.
As
a
result
of
this
modification,
we
expensed
$91
in
unamortized
deferred
financial
costs
and
fees
during
the
year
ended
December
31,
2014.
On
April
24,
2013,
we
modified
the
$30,000
mortgage
loan
on
the
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
Westside,
Los
Angeles,
CA.
The
modified
loan
bears
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
one
month
U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
plus
3.00%,
and
matures
on
September
29,
2017.
The
modification
also
contains
an
option
for
the
Company
to
advance
$5,000
in
principal
subject
to
certain
conditions,
including
there
being
no
event
of
default
and
compliance
with
debt
service
coverage
ratio
requirements.
As
a
result
of
this
modification,
we
incurred
a
loss
on
debt
extinguishment
of
$284.
This
modification
did
not
change
the
terms
of
the
interest
rate
swap
that
we
entered
into
in
2011,
which
had
effectively
fixed
the
interest
at
4.947%,
and
now
effectively
fixes
the
interest
at
4.10%
through
September
29,
2015.
After
the
maturity
date
of
the
swap,
the
loan
will
bear
interest
at
the
stated
variable
rate
of
one-‐month
U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
plus
3.00%,
with
a
LIBOR
floor
of
0.75%.
See
“Note
7
–
Fair
Value
Measurements
and
Derivative
Instruments”
for
more
information.
On
May
23,
2012,
we
repaid
outstanding
mortgage
debt
with
an
original
principal
balance
of
$22,000
secured
by
the
Hotel
373,
Fifth
Avenue,
NY,
and
on
May
24,
2012
entered
into
a
new
mortgage
obligation
of
$19,000,
66
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
5
–
DEBT
(CONTINUED)
incurring
a
loss
on
debt
extinguishment
of
approximately
$66.
The
new
mortgage
debt
bears
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
one
month
U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
plus
3.85%
and
matures
on
June
1,
2017.
In
conjunction
with
this
refinance,
we
entered
into
an
interest
rate
cap
that
matures
on
June
1,
2015
that
effectively
limits
interest
to
5.85%
per
annum.
On
May
9,
2012,
we
repaid
outstanding
mortgage
debt
with
a
principal
balance
of
$29,730
secured
by
the
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
Miami,
FL.
On
July
2,
2012,
we
entered
into
a
new
mortgage
with
an
initial
obligation
of
$45,000,
with
three
additional
draws
of
$5,000
every
90
days
to
fund
the
construction
of
the
new
oceanfront
tower
as
described
in
“Note
2
–
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties”.
The
new
mortgage
debt
bears
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
one
month
U.S.
LIBOR
plus
3.50%
and
matures
on
July
1,
2016.
Also
on
July
2,
2012,
we
entered
into
an
interest
rate
cap
that
effectively
limits
interest
to
4.32%
per
annum.
On
January
31,
2012,
we
repaid
outstanding
mortgage
debt
with
an
original
principal
balance
of
$32,500
secured
by
the
Capitol
Hill
Suites,
Washington,
D.C.,
incurring
a
loss
on
debt
extinguishment
of
approximately
$7
and
simultaneously
entered
into
a
new
mortgage
obligation
of
$27,500.
The
new
mortgage
debt
bears
interest
at
a
variable
rate
of
one
month
U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
plus
3.25%
and
matures
on
February
1,
2015.
On
the
same
date,
we
entered
into
an
interest
rate
swap
that
effectively
fixes
the
interest
at
3.79%
per
annum.
As
a
result
of
our
acquisition
of
Metro
29th,
first
mortgage
debt
with
a
principal
balance
of
$54,602
secured
by
the
Holiday
Inn
Express,
New
York,
NY
is
included
on
our
consolidated
balance
sheet.
This
debt
bears
interest
at
a
fixed
rate
of
6.50%
and
matures
on
November
5,
2016.
In
addition,
we
consolidated
mezzanine
debt
with
a
principal
balance
of
$15,000.
We
repaid
this
mezzanine
debt
on
June
29,
2012
and
incurred
a
loss
on
debt
extinguishment
of
approximately
$176.
67
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
6
–
COMMITMENTS
AND
CONTINGENCIES
AND
RELATED
PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Management
Agreements
Our
wholly-‐owned
taxable
REIT
subsidiary
("TRS"),
44
New
England,
engages
eligible
independent
contractors
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
for
qualification
as
a
REIT
under
the
internal
revenue
code
of
1986,
as
amended,
including
HHMLP,
as
the
property
managers
for
hotels
it
leases
from
us
pursuant
to
management
agreements.
HHMLP
is
owned,
in
part,
by
certain
executives
and
trustees
of
the
Company.
Our
management
agreements
with
HHMLP
provide
for
five-‐year
terms
and
are
subject
to
early
termination
upon
the
occurrence
of
defaults
and
certain
other
events
described
therein.
As
required
under
the
REIT
qualification
rules,
HHMLP
must
qualify
as
an
“eligible
independent
contractor”
during
the
term
of
the
management
agreements.
Under
the
management
agreements,
HHMLP
generally
pays
the
operating
expenses
of
our
hotels.
All
operating
expenses
or
other
expenses
incurred
by
HHMLP
in
performing
its
authorized
duties
are
reimbursed
or
borne
by
our
TRS
to
the
extent
the
operating
expenses
or
other
expenses
are
incurred
within
the
limits
of
the
applicable
approved
hotel
operating
budget.
HHMLP
is
not
obligated
to
advance
any
of
its
own
funds
for
operating
expenses
of
a
hotel
or
to
incur
any
liability
in
connection
with
operating
a
hotel.
Management
agreements
with
other
unaffiliated
hotel
management
companies
have
similar
terms.
For
its
services,
HHMLP
receives
a
base
management
fee
and,
if
a
hotel
exceeds
certain
thresholds,
an
incentive
management
fee.
The
base
management
fee
for
a
hotel
is
due
monthly
and
is
equal
to
3%
of
gross
revenues
associated
with
each
hotel
managed
for
the
related
month.
The
incentive
management
fee,
if
any,
for
a
hotel
is
due
annually
in
arrears
on
the
ninetieth
day
following
the
end
of
each
fiscal
year
and
is
based
upon
the
financial
performance
of
the
hotels.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
base
management
fees
incurred
totaled
$12,263,
$11,713,
and
$10,781
respectively,
and
are
recorded
as
Hotel
Operating
Expenses.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
we
did
not
incur
incentive
management
fees.
Franchise
Agreements
Our
branded
hotel
properties
are
operated
under
franchise
agreements
assumed
by
the
hotel
property
lessee.
The
franchise
agreements
have
10
to
20
year
terms,
but
may
be
terminated
by
either
the
franchisee
or
franchisor
on
certain
anniversary
dates
specified
in
the
agreements.
The
franchise
agreements
require
annual
payments
for
franchise
royalties,
reservation,
and
advertising
services,
and
such
payments
are
based
upon
percentages
of
gross
room
revenue.
These
payments
are
paid
by
the
hotels
and
charged
to
expense
as
incurred.
Franchise
fee
expense
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
were
$26,015,
$26,247,
and
$24,278
respectively,
and
are
recorded
in
Hotel
Operating
Expenses.
The
initial
fees
incurred
to
enter
into
the
franchise
agreements
are
amortized
over
the
life
of
the
franchise
agreements.
Accounting
and
Information
Technology
Fees
Each
of
the
wholly-‐owned
hotels
and
consolidated
joint
venture
hotel
properties
managed
by
HHMLP
incurs
a
monthly
accounting
and
information
technology
fee.
Monthly
fees
for
accounting
services
are
between
$2
and
$3
per
property
and
monthly
information
technology
fees
range
from
$1
to
$2
per
property.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
the
Company
incurred
accounting
fees
of
$1,410,
$1,739,
and
$1,741
respectively.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
the
Company
incurred
information
technology
fees
of
$416,
$510,
and
$509
respectively.
Accounting
fees
and
information
technology
fees
are
included
in
Hotel
Operating
Expenses.
Capital
Expenditure
Fees
HHMLP
charges
a
5%
fee
on
all
capital
expenditures
and
pending
renovation
projects
at
the
properties
as
compensation
for
procurement
services
related
to
capital
expenditures
and
for
project
management
of
renovation
projects.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
we
incurred
fees
of
$742,
$1,459,
and
$1,076
respectively,
which
were
capitalized
with
the
cost
of
fixed
asset
additions.
68
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
6
–
COMMITMENTS
AND
CONTINGENCIES
AND
RELATED
PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
(CONTINUED)
Acquisitions
from
Affiliates
We
have
entered
into
an
option
agreement
with
each
of
our
officers
and
certain
trustees
such
that
we
obtain
a
right
of
first
refusal
to
purchase
any
hotel
owned
or
developed
in
the
future
by
these
individuals
or
entities
controlled
by
them
at
fair
market
value.
This
right
of
first
refusal
would
apply
to
each
party
until
one
year
after
such
party
ceases
to
be
an
officer
or
trustee
of
the
Company.
Our
Acquisition
Committee
of
the
Board
of
Trustees
is
comprised
solely
of
independent
trustees,
and
the
purchase
prices
and
all
material
terms
of
the
purchase
of
hotels
from
related
parties
are
approved
by
the
Acquisition
Committee.
Hotel
Supplies
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
we
incurred
charges
for
hotel
supplies
of
$163,
$222,
and
$149
respectively.
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
we
incurred
charges
for
capital
expenditure
purchases
of
$10,610,
$19,783,
and
$11,809
respectively.
These
purchases
were
made
from
Hersha
Purchasing
and
Design,
a
hotel
supply
company
owned,
in
part,
by
certain
executives
and
trustees
of
the
Company.
Hotel
supplies
are
expensed
and
included
in
Hotel
Operating
Expenses
on
our
consolidated
statements
of
operations,
and
capital
expenditure
purchases
are
included
in
investment
in
hotel
properties
on
our
consolidated
balance
sheets.
Approximately
$2
is
included
in
accounts
payable
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively.
Due
From
Related
Parties
The
due
from
related
parties
balance
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
was
approximately
$6,580
and
$11,124,
respectively.
The
balances
primarily
consisted
of
working
capital
deposits
made
to
Hersha
affiliates.
Due
to
Related
Parties
The
balance
due
to
related
parties
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
was
approximately
$7,203
and
$4,815,
respectively.
The
balances
consisted
of
amounts
payable
to
HHMLP
for
administrative,
management,
and
benefit
related
fees.
Hotel
Ground
Rent
For
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
we
incurred
$2,433,
$985,
and
$835
respectively,
of
rent
expense
payable
pursuant
to
ground
leases
related
to
certain
hotel
properties.
Future
minimum
lease
payments
(without
reflecting
future
applicable
Consumer
Price
Index
increases)
under
these
agreements
are
as
follows:
Year
Ending
December
31,
Amount
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
$
$
2,342
2,374
2,374
2,374
2,374
229,028
240,866
69
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
6
–
COMMITMENTS
AND
CONTINGENCIES
AND
RELATED
PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
(CONTINUED)
Contingent
Consideration
As
noted
in
“Note
2
–
Investment
in
Hotel
Properties”,
the
purchase
agreement
for
the
acquisition
of
the
Parrot
Key
Resort
in
Key
West,
FL,
contains
a
provision
that
entitles
the
seller
to
additional
consideration
of
$2,000
contingent
upon
the
hotel
achieving
certain
net
operating
income
thresholds
within
twelve
months
of
acquisition.
Since
the
time
of
acquisition
and
upon
measurement
at
December
31,
2014,
a
liability
of
$2,000
was
recorded
as
the
fair
value
of
the
contingent
consideration
was
determined
to
be
$2,000.
The
maximum
cash
payment
under
this
arrangement
is
$2,000
in
2015.
Litigation
We
are
not
presently
subject
to
any
material
litigation
nor,
to
our
knowledge,
is
any
other
litigation
threatened
against
us,
other
than
routine
actions
for
negligence
or
other
claims
and
administrative
proceedings
arising
in
the
ordinary
course
of
business,
some
of
which
are
expected
to
be
covered
by
liability
insurance
and
all
of
which
collectively
are
not
expected
to
have
a
material
adverse
effect
on
our
liquidity,
results
of
operations
or
business
or
financial
condition.
70
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
7
–
FAIR
VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
AND
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
Fair
Value
Measurements
Our
determination
of
fair
value
measurements
are
based
on
the
assumptions
that
market
participants
would
use
in
pricing
the
asset
or
liability.
As
a
basis
for
considering
market
participant
assumptions
in
fair
value
measurements,
we
utilize
a
fair
value
hierarchy
that
distinguishes
between
market
participant
assumptions
based
on
market
data
obtained
from
sources
independent
of
the
reporting
entity
(observable
inputs
that
are
classified
within
Levels
1
and
2
of
the
hierarchy)
and
the
reporting
entity’s
own
assumptions
about
market
participant
assumptions
(unobservable
inputs
classified
within
Level
3
of
the
hierarchy).
Level
1
inputs
utilize
quoted
prices
(unadjusted)
in
active
markets
for
identical
assets
or
liabilities
that
the
Company
has
the
ability
to
access.
Level
2
inputs
are
inputs
other
than
quoted
prices
included
in
Level
1
that
are
observable
for
the
asset
or
liability,
either
directly
or
indirectly.
Level
2
inputs
may
include
quoted
prices
for
similar
assets
and
liabilities
in
active
markets,
as
well
as
inputs
that
are
observable
for
the
asset
or
liability
(other
than
quoted
prices),
such
as
interest
rates,
foreign
exchange
rates
and
yield
curves
that
are
observable
at
commonly
quoted
intervals.
Level
3
inputs
are
unobservable
inputs
for
the
asset
or
liabilities,
which
are
typically
based
on
an
entity’s
own
assumptions,
as
there
is
little,
if
any,
related
market
activity.
In
instances
where
the
determination
of
the
fair
value
measurement
is
based
on
inputs
from
different
levels
of
the
fair
value
hierarchy,
the
level
in
the
fair
value
hierarchy
within
which
the
entire
fair
value
measurement
falls
is
based
on
the
lowest
level
input
that
is
significant
to
the
fair
value
measurement
in
its
entirety.
The
Company’s
assessment
of
the
significance
of
a
particular
input
to
the
fair
value
measurement
in
its
entirety
requires
judgment,
and
considers
factors
specific
to
the
asset
or
liability.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
Company’s
derivative
instruments
represented
the
only
financial
instruments
measured
at
fair
value.
Currently,
the
Company
uses
derivative
instruments,
such
as
interest
rate
swaps
and
caps,
to
manage
its
interest
rate
risk.
The
valuation
of
these
instruments
is
determined
using
widely
accepted
valuation
techniques,
including
discounted
cash
flow
analysis
on
the
expected
cash
flows
of
each
derivative.
This
analysis
reflects
the
contractual
terms
of
the
derivatives,
including
the
period
to
maturity,
and
uses
observable
market-‐based
inputs.
We
incorporate
credit
valuation
adjustments
to
appropriately
reflect
both
our
own
nonperformance
risk
and
the
respective
counterparty’s
nonperformance
risk
in
the
fair
value
measurements.
In
adjusting
the
fair
value
of
its
derivative
contracts
for
the
effect
of
nonperformance
risk,
we
have
considered
the
impact
of
netting
and
any
applicable
credit
enhancements,
such
as
collateral
postings,
thresholds,
mutual
puts
and
guarantees.
Although
we
have
determined
that
the
majority
of
the
inputs
used
to
value
our
derivatives
fall
within
Level
2
of
the
fair
value
hierarchy,
the
credit
valuation
adjustments
associated
with
our
derivatives
utilize
Level
3
inputs,
such
as
estimates
of
current
credit
spreads,
to
evaluate
the
likelihood
of
default
by
us
and
the
counterparties.
However,
as
of
December
31,
2014
we
have
assessed
the
significance
of
the
effect
of
the
credit
valuation
adjustments
on
the
overall
valuation
of
our
derivative
positions
and
have
determined
that
the
credit
valuation
adjustments
are
not
significant
to
the
overall
valuation
of
our
derivatives.
As
a
result,
we
have
determined
that
our
derivative
valuations
in
their
entirety
are
classified
in
Level
2
of
the
fair
value
hierarchy.
71
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
7
–
FAIR
VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
AND
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Derivative
Instruments
Hedged
Debt
Strike
Rate
Type
Index
Effective
Date
Maturity
Date
Estimated
Fair
Value
Notional
Amount
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
Courtyard,
LA
Westside,
Culver
City,
LA
Capitol
Hill
Hotel,
Washington,
DC
Swap
1.097%
Swap
0.540%
September
29,
2011
February
1,
2012
September
29,
2015
February
1,
2015
Hotel
373,
New
York,
NY
*
Cap
2.000%
May
24,
2012
June
1,
2015
$
30,000
$
(174)
$
(374)
26,639
(8)
(88)
18,356
-‐
1
Courtyard,
Miami,
FL
Swap
0.820%
July
2,
2012
July
1,
2016
60,000
(218)
(354)
Subordinated
Notes
Payable
Cap
2.000%
Unsecured
Term
Loan
Unsecured
Term
Loan
Hyatt,
Union
Square,
New
York,
NY
Duane
Street
Hotel,
New
York,
NY
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY
Swap
0.545%
Swap
0.600%
Cap
2.000%
Swap
0.933%
Cap
1.100%
Swap
1.152%
July
30,
2012
November
5,
2012
December
18,
2012
April
9,
2013
February
1,
2014
July
30,
2014
November
5,
2016
November
5,
2016
April
9,
2016
February
1,
2017
May
27,
2014
June
1,
2015
February
21,
2017
June
1,
2015
51,548
-‐
-‐
100,000
272
430
50,000
85
137
55,000
9
76
9,352
(29)
45,000
-‐
45,000
$
(149)
(212)
$
-‐
-‐
-‐
(172)
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
3.85%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
3.25%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
3.85%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
3.50%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
3.00%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
2.40%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
2.40%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
4.19%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
4.50%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
2.90%
1-‐Month
LIBOR
+
2.90%
*
On
April
30,
2014,
we
sold
Hotel
373,
New
York,
NY,
and
therefore,
terminated
the
interest
rate
cap
associated
with
the
mortgage
on
this
property.
As
a
result
of
this
termination,
we
expensed
$55
in
fees,
which
are
included
in
the
gain
on
disposition
of
hotel
properties.
On
January
31,
2014,
we
entered
into
an
interest
rate
swap
that
effectively
fixes
interest
payments
at
5.433%
on
a
variable
rate
mortgage
on
the
Duane
Street
Hotel.
See
“Note
5
–
Debt”
for
more
information
on
the
interest
rate
swap.
On
May
27,
2014,
we
entered
into
an
interest
rate
cap
that
effectively
fixes
interest
payments
when
1
month-‐U.S.
dollar
LIBOR
exceeds
1.10%
on
a
variable
rate
mortgage
on
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn
52nd
Street,
New
York,
NY.
The
notional
amount
of
the
interest
rate
cap
is
$45,000
and
equals
the
principal
of
the
variable
rate
mortgage
being
hedged.
This
interest
rate
cap
matures
on
June
1,
2015.
Upon
maturity
of
the
interest
rate
cap,
an
interest
rate
swap
will
go
into
effect
that
effectively
fixes
the
interest
payment
at
4.052%.
The
fair
value
of
certain
swaps
and
our
interest
rate
caps
is
included
in
other
assets
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
and
the
fair
value
of
certain
of
our
interest
rate
swaps
is
included
in
accounts
payable,
accrued
expenses
and
other
liabilities
at
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013.
The
net
change
in
fair
value
of
derivative
instruments
designated
as
cash
flow
hedges
was
a
gain
of
$18
and
a
gain
of
$1,410,
and
a
loss
of
$635
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
These
unrealized
gains
and
losses
were
reflected
on
our
consolidated
balance
sheet
in
accumulated
other
comprehensive
income.
Amounts
reported
in
accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
related
to
derivatives
will
be
reclassified
to
interest
expense
as
interest
payments
are
made
on
the
Company’s
variable-‐rate
derivative.
The
change
in
net
72
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
7
–
FAIR
VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
AND
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
(CONTINUED)
unrealized
gains/losses
on
cash
flow
hedges
reflects
a
reclassification
of
$1,509
of
net
unrealized
gains/losses
from
accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
as
an
increase
to
interest
expense
during
2014.
During
2015,
the
Company
estimates
that
an
additional
$1,113
will
be
reclassified
as
an
increase
to
interest
expense.
Fair
Value
of
Debt
The
Company
estimates
the
fair
value
of
its
fixed
rate
debt
and
the
credit
spreads
over
variable
market
rates
on
its
variable
rate
debt
by
discounting
the
future
cash
flows
of
each
instrument
at
estimated
market
rates
or
credit
spreads
consistent
with
the
maturity
of
the
debt
obligation
with
similar
credit
policies.
Credit
spreads
take
into
consideration
general
market
conditions
and
maturity.
The
inputs
utilized
in
estimating
the
fair
value
of
debt
are
classified
in
Level
2
of
the
fair
value
hierarchy.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
the
carrying
value
and
estimated
fair
value
of
the
Company’s
debt
were
$918,923
and
$916,877,
respectively.
As
of
December
31,
2013,
the
carrying
value
and
estimated
fair
value
of
the
Company’s
debt
were
$819,336
and
$828,974,
respectively.
Impaired
Hotel
Property
As
discussed
in
“Note
12-‐Discontinued
Operations,”
the
Company
recorded
an
impairment
loss
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
of
approximately
$3,723
for
the
Holiday
Inn
Express
Camp
Springs,
MD
for
which
the
anticipated
net
proceeds
from
the
sale
of
the
hotel
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
The
fair
value
of
the
hotel
was
estimated
using
level
2
inputs.
As
discussed
in
“Note
12-‐Discontinued
Operations,”
the
Company
recorded
an
impairment
loss
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
of
approximately
$6,591
for
the
non-‐core
hotel
portfolio
the
Company
was
under
contract
to
sell
for
which
the
anticipated
net
proceeds
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
The
fair
value
of
the
non-‐core
hotel
portfolio
was
estimated
using
level
2
inputs.
73
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
8
–
SHARE
BASED
PAYMENTS
In
May
2011,
the
Company
established
and
our
shareholders
approved
the
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
2012
Equity
Incentive
Plan
(the
“2012
Plan”)
for
the
purpose
of
attracting
and
retaining
executive
officers,
employees,
trustees
and
other
persons
and
entities
that
provide
services
to
the
Company.
Executives
&
Employees
Annual
Long
Term
Equity
Incentive
Programs
To
further
align
the
interests
of
the
Company’s
executives
with
those
of
shareholders,
the
Compensation
Committee
grants
annual
long
term
equity
incentive
awards
that
are
both
“performance
based”
and
“time
based.”
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
all
share
awards
issued
to
executives
under
the
Annual
LTIPs:
Original
Issuance
Date
Shares
Issued
Share
Price
on
date
of
grant
Vesting
Period
Vesting
Schedule
December
23,
2014
December
31,
2013
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
Shares
Vested
(2)
Unearned
Compensation
(2)
March
21,
2014
(2013
Annual
LTIP)
March
20,
2013
(2012
Annual
LTIP)
March
26,
2012
(2011
Annual
LTIP)
447,959
$
5.80
3
years
25%/year
(1)
111,988
-‐
$
-‐
$
-‐
779,045
$
5.95
3
years
25%/year
(1)
389,520
389,520
-‐
1,039
748,927
$
5.45
3
years
25%/year
(1)
561,694
561,694
1,063,202
951,214
$
-‐
-‐
$
266
1,305
(1)
(2)
25%
of
the
issued
shares
vested
immediately
upon
issuance.
In
general,
the
remaining
shares
vest
25%
on
the
first
through
third
anniversaries
of
the
date
of
effective
issuance
(subject
to
continuous
employment
through
the
applicable
vesting
date).
All
of
the
unvested
shares
issued
as
part
of
the
Annual
LTIP
plans
noted
above
were
forfeited
on
December
23,
2014,
and
concurrently
issued
as
LTIP
Units.
See
below
for
more
information.
Stock
based
compensation
expense
related
to
the
Annual
LTIP
Plans
of
$2,987,
$3,762,
and
$3,925
was
incurred
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
Unearned
compensation
related
to
the
Annual
LTIPs
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
was
$0
and
$1,305,
respectively.
LTIP
Units
On
December
23,
2014,
the
2012
Plan
was
amended
and
restated
to
add
LTIP
Units
as
a
type
of
award
available
under
the
2012
Plan.
On
this
date,
the
Compensation
Committee
approved
an
aggregate
of
1,948,324
LTIP
Units
to
certain
executive
officers.
These
executive
officers
forfeited
an
aggregate
of
1,948,324
Class
A
Common
Shares,
all
of
which
were
unvested
as
of
the
grant
date
of
the
LTIP
Units
and
previously
awarded
to
the
executive
officers
under
the
2012
Plan
as
restricted
stock
awards.
The
LTIP
Units
granted
on
December
23,
2014
are
subject
to
the
same
time-‐based
vesting
conditions
that
applied
to
the
forfeited
restricted
stock
awards.
74
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
8
–
SHARE
BASED
PAYMENTS
(CONTINUED)
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
the
LTIP
Units
issued
to
executive
officers
as
of
December
31,
2014.:
Issuance
Date
December
23,
2014
(2013
Annual
LTIP)
December
23,
2014
(2012
Annual
LTIP)
December
23,
2014
(2011
Annual
LTIP)
December
23,
2014
LTIP
Units
Issued
Vesting
Period
Vesting
Schedule
Units
Vested
Unearned
Compensation
December
31,
2014
335,972
3
years
25%/year
(1)
111,991
$
389,524
3
years
25%/year
(1)
194,761
187,233
3
years
25%/year
(1)
1,035,595
5
years
33%
Year
3,
4,
5
(2)
1,948,324
187,233
-‐
493,985
$
582
309
-‐
2,650
3,541
(1)
(2)
As
noted
above,
the
vesting
schedule
for
each
of
the
Annual
LTIP
Plans
remains
intact
with
the
conversion
to
LTIP
Units.
On
April
18,
2012,
the
Company
entered
into
amended
and
restated
employment
agreements
with
the
Company’s
executive
officers.
To
induce
the
executives
to
agree
to
the
substantial
reduction
in
benefits
upon
certain
terminations
following
a
change
of
control
as
described
in
the
agreements,
the
Company
awarded
an
aggregate
of
1,035,595
restricted
common
shares
to
the
executives
pursuant
to
the
2012
Plan.
None
of
these
restricted
common
shares
will
vest
prior
to
the
third
anniversary
of
the
date
of
issuance.
Thereafter,
33.3%
of
each
award
of
restricted
common
shares
will
vest
on
each
of
the
third,
fourth
and
fifth
anniversaries
of
the
date
of
issuance.
Vesting
will
accelerate
upon
a
change
of
control
or
if
the
relevant
executive’s
employment
with
the
Company
were
to
terminate
for
any
reason
other
than
for
cause
(as
defined
in
the
agreements).
Multi-‐Year
LTIP
On
April
11,
2014,
the
Compensation
Committee
approved
the
2014
Multi-‐Year
LTIP.
The
common
shares
issuable
under
this
program
are
based
on
the
Company’s
achievement
of
a
certain
level
of
(1)
absolute
total
shareholder
return
(37.50%
of
the
award),
(2)
relative
total
shareholder
return
as
compared
to
the
Company’s
peer
group
(37.50%
of
the
award),
and
(3)
relative
growth
in
revenue
per
available
room
compared
to
the
Company’s
peer
group
(25%
of
the
award).
This
program
has
a
three-‐year
performance
period
which
commenced
on
January
1,
2014
and
ends
December
31,
2016.
As
of
December
31,
2014
no
common
shares
have
been
issued
in
accordance
with
the
2014
Plan
to
the
executive
officers
in
settlement
of
2014
Multi-‐Year
LTIP
awards.
On
April
15,
2013,
the
Compensation
Committee
approved
the
2013
Multi-‐Year
LTIP.
The
common
shares
issuable
under
this
program
are
based
on
the
Company’s
achievement
of
a
certain
level
of
(1)
absolute
total
shareholder
return
(50%
of
the
award),
(2)
relative
total
shareholder
return
as
compared
to
the
Company’s
peer
group
(25%
of
the
award),
and
(3)
relative
growth
in
revenue
per
available
room
compared
to
the
Company’s
peer
group
(25%
of
the
award).
This
program
has
a
three
year
performance
period
which
commenced
on
January
1,
2013
and
ends
December
31,
2015.
As
of
December
31,
2014
no
common
shares
have
been
issued
in
accordance
with
the
2013
Plan
to
the
executive
officers
in
settlement
of
2013
Multi-‐Year
LTIP
awards.
The
Company
accounts
for
the
total
shareholder
return
components
of
these
grants
as
market-‐based
awards
where
the
Company
estimates
unearned
compensation
at
the
grant
date
fair
value
which
is
then
amortized
into
compensation
cost
over
the
vesting
period
of
each
individual
plan.
The
Company
accounts
for
the
RevPAR
component
of
the
grants
as
performance-‐based
awards.
75
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
8
–
SHARE
BASED
PAYMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Stock
based
compensation
expense
of
$598,
$3,481
and
$3,192
was
recorded
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively,
for
the
Multi-‐Year
LTIPs.
Unearned
compensation
related
to
the
Multi
Year
LTIPs
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively,
was
$1,621
and
$1,157.
Restricted
Share
Awards
In
addition
to
stock
based
compensation
expense
related
to
awards
under
the
Multi-‐Year
LTIPs
and
Annual
LTIPs,
stock
based
compensation
expense
related
to
restricted
common
shares
issued
to
executives
and
employees
of
the
Company
of
$1,495,
$1,618,
and
$1,911
was
incurred
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012
respectively.
Unearned
compensation
related
to
the
restricted
share
awards
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
was
$322
and
$4,102,
respectively.
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
all
unvested
share
awards
issued
to
executives
under
the
2012
Plan
and
prior
equity
incentive
plans:
Original
Issuance
Date
July
15,
2014
June
23,
2014
March
24,
2014
February
13,
2014
September
20,
2013
June
28,
2013
June
29,
2012
Shares
Issued
52,077
4,411
8,184
1,846
4,605
48,600
52,703
April
18,
2012
June
30,
2011
1,035,595
17,692
Total
1,225,713
Share
Price
on
Date
of
Grant
6.75
6.50
5.69
5.44
5.52
5.64
5.28
5.47
5.57
Vesting
Period
2
years
2
years
2
years
2
years
2-‐4
years
2-‐4
years
2-‐4
years
Vesting
Schedule
50%
/year
50%
/year
50%
/year
50%
/year
25-‐50%
/year
25-‐50%
/year
25-‐50%
/year
5
years
33%
Year
3,
4,
5
(1)
25-‐50%
/year
2-‐4
years
Shares
Vested
Unearned
Compensation
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
6,126
-‐
4,091
923
4,605
22,895
44,967
-‐
13,804
97,411
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
22,480
177
20
10
2
-‐
69
36
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
19
199
110
-‐
9,919
32,399
$
-‐
8
322
$
3,746
28
4,102
(1)
As
noted
above,
the
unvested
shares
associated
with
this
issuance
were
forfeited
and
immediately
issued
as
LTIP
Units
on
December
23,
2014.
The
historical
information
pertaining
to
the
unvested
shares
before
the
conversion
is
shown
this
table.
Trustees
Annual
Retainer
The
Compensation
Committee
approved
a
program
that
allows
the
Company’s
trustees
to
make
a
voluntary
election
to
receive
any
portion
of
the
annual
cash
retainer
in
the
form
of
common
equity
valued
at
a
25%
premium
to
the
cash
that
would
have
been
received.
On
December
30,
2014,
we
issued
12,860
shares
which
do
not
fully
vest
until
December
31,
2015.
Compensation
expense
incurred
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively,
was
$220,
$160,
and
$66.
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
all
unvested
share
awards
issued
to
trustees
in
lieu
of
annual
cash
retainer:
Original
Issuance
Date
December
30,
2014
December
27,
2013
Total
Shares
Issued
12,860
$
39,133
51,993
Share
Price
on
Date
of
Grant
7.25
5.63
Vesting
Period
1
year
1
year
Vesting
Schedule
100%
100%
$
Unearned
Compensation
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
93
$
-‐
93
-‐
220
220
76
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
8
–
SHARE
BASED
PAYMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Multi-‐Year
Long-‐Term
Equity
Incentives
Compensation
expense
for
the
multi-‐year
long
term
incentive
plans
for
the
Company’s
trustees
incurred
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively,
was
$71,
$55,
and
$43.
Unearned
compensation
related
to
the
multi-‐year
long
term
equity
incentives
was
$127
and
$124
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013,
respectively.
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
all
unvested
share
awards
issued
to
trustees
under
the
2012
Plan
and
prior
to
equity
incentive
plans:
Original
Issuance
Date
December
30,
2014
December
27,
2013
December
28,
2012
June
5,
2012
Shares
Issued
10,000
12,000
12,000
10,800
Vesting
Period
3
years
3
years
3
years
3
years
Vesting
Schedule
33%
/year
33%
/year
33%
/year
33%
/year
Shares
Vested
Unearned
Compensation
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
-‐
5,335
8,670
10,800
24,805
-‐
$
-‐
4,002
7,200
11,202
$
73
$
38
16
-‐
127
$
-‐
67
39
18
124
Share
Awards
Compensation
expense
related
to
share
awards
issued
to
the
Board
of
Trustees
of
$457,
$496
and
$402
was
incurred
during
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively
and
is
recorded
in
general
and
administrative
expense
on
the
statement
of
operations.
Share
awards
issued
to
the
Board
of
Trustees
are
immediately
vested.
On
June
23,
2014
an
aggregate
47,475
shares
were
issued
to
the
Board
of
Trustees
at
a
price
per
share
on
the
date
of
grant
of
$6.50.
On
December
30,
2014,
an
aggregate
20,500
shares
were
issued
to
the
Board
of
Trustees
at
a
price
per
share
on
the
date
of
grant
of
$7.25.
Non-‐employees
The
Company
issues
share
based
awards
as
compensation
to
non-‐employees
for
services
provided
to
the
Company
consisting
primarily
of
restricted
common
shares.
The
Company
recorded
stock
based
compensation
expense
of
$200,
$174,
and
$139
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
Unearned
compensation
related
to
the
restricted
share
awards
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
December
31,
2013
was
$81
and
$81,
respectively.
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
all
unvested
share
awards
issued
to
non-‐employees
under
the
Company’s
2008
Equity
Incentive
Plan
and
the
2012
Plan:
Original
Issuance
Date
March
24,
2014
Shares
Issued
30,000
$
Share
Price
on
Date
of
Grant
Vesting
Period
5.69
2
years
Vesting
Schedule
50%
/year
Shares
Vested
Unearned
Compensation
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
December
31,
2014
December
31,
2013
15,000
-‐
$
81
$
February
1,
2013
30,000
$
5.41
2
years
50%
/year
30,000
14,999
Total
60,000
45,000
14,999
$
-‐
81
$
-‐
81
81
77
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
9
–
EARNINGS
PER
SHARE
The
following
table
is
a
reconciliation
of
the
income
or
loss
(numerator)
and
the
weighted
average
shares
(denominator)
used
in
the
calculation
of
basic
and
diluted
earnings
per
common
share.
The
computation
of
basic
and
diluted
earnings
per
share
is
presented
below.
NUMERATOR:
Basic
and
Diluted*
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
$
69,936
$
20,753
$
7,498
For
the
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2012
(Income)
Loss
from
Continuing
Operations
allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Distributions
to
Preferred
Shareholders
Dividends
Paid
on
Unvested
Restricted
Shares
and
LTIP
Units
Extinguishment
of
Issuance
Costs
Upon
Redemption
of
Series
A
Preferred
Stock
Income
(Loss)
from
Continuing
Operations
attributable
to
Common
Shareholders
Discontinued
Operations
(1,069)
(14,356)
658
703
(14,611)
(14,000)
(515)
(804)
(459)
-‐
(2,250)
-‐
53,996
3,746
(6,258)
(Loss)
Income
from
Discontinued
Operations
(1,665)
29,195
14,720
Loss
(Income)
from
Discontinued
Operations
allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
attributable
to
Common
Shareholders
53
(993)
(545)
(1,612)
28,202
14,175
Net
Income
attributable
to
Common
Shareholders
$
52,384
$
31,948
$
7,917
DENOMINATOR:
Weighted
average
number
of
common
shares
-‐
basic
199,109,209
198,390,450
187,415,270
Effect
of
dilutive
securities:
Restricted
Stock
Awards
(unvested)
Contingently
Issued
Shares
1,358,603
729,498
2,384,165
1,143,562
-‐
*
-‐
*
Weighted
average
number
of
common
shares
-‐
diluted
201,197,310
201,918,177
187,415,270
Income
(loss)
allocated
to
noncontrolling
interest
in
Hersha
Hospitality
Limited
Partnership
has
been
excluded
from
the
numerator
and
units
of
limited
partnership
interest
in
Hersha
Hospitality
Limited
Partnership
have
been
omitted
from
the
denominator
for
the
purpose
of
computing
diluted
earnings
per
share
since
the
effect
of
including
these
amounts
in
the
numerator
and
denominator
would
have
no
impact.
In
addition,
potentially
dilutive
common
shares,
if
any,
have
been
excluded
from
the
denominator
if
they
are
anti-‐dilutive
to
income
(loss)
from
continuing
operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders.
*
78
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
9
–
EARNINGS
PER
SHARE
(CONTINUED)
The
following
table
summarizes
potentially
dilutive
securities
that
have
been
excluded
from
the
denominator
for
the
purpose
of
computing
diluted
earnings
per
share:
Common
Units
LTIP
Units
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Outstanding
Contingently
Issuable
Share
Awards
Options
to
Acquire
Common
Shares
Outstanding
Total
potentially
dilutive
securities
excluded
from
the
denominator
For
the
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
2013
2012
6,909,649
32,711
-‐
-‐
-‐
6,968,035
7,208,123
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
433,097
2,778,545
275,580
6,942,360
6,968,035
10,695,345
79
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
10
–
CASH
FLOW
DISCLOSURES
AND
NON
CASH
INVESTING
AND
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Interest
paid
during
2014,
2013,
and
2012
totaled
$40,760,
$42,984,
and
$41,744
respectively.
The
following
non-‐cash
investing
and
financing
activities
occurred
during
2014,
2013
and
2012:
Common
Shares
issued
as
part
of
the
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan
Acquisition
of
hotel
properties:
Debt
assumed
Development
loan
accrued
interest
revenue
receivable
paid
in-‐kind
by
adding
balance
to
development
loan
principal
Settlement
of
development
loan
receivable
principal
and
accrued
interest
revenue
receivable
Disposition
of
hotel
properties:
Investment
in
hotel
properties,
net,
conveyed
to
mortgage
lender
Debt
conveyed
to
mortgage
lender
Debt
assumed
by
purchaser
Conversion
of
Common
Units
to
Common
Shares
Reallocation
of
noncontrolling
interest
Accrued
payables
for
fixed
assets
placed
into
service
2014
2013
2012
$
50
$
38
$
24
24,924
-‐
85,913
-‐
-‐
678
22,494
13,303
-‐
-‐
-‐
45,710
72
-‐
1,312
-‐
-‐
-‐
106
-‐
2,572
1,938
2,940
54,217
572
(966)
-‐
80
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
11
–
HOTEL
DISPOSITIONS
Effective
January
1,
2014,
we
early
adopted
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08
concerning
the
classification
and
reporting
of
discontinued
operations.
This
amendment
defines
discontinued
operations
as
a
component
of
an
entity
that
represents
a
strategic
shift
that
has
(or
will
have)
a
major
effect
on
an
entity’s
operations
and
financial
results.
As
a
result
of
the
early
adoption
of
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08,
we
anticipate
that
most
of
our
hotel
dispositions
will
not
be
classified
as
discontinued
operations
as
most
will
not
fit
this
definition.
For
transactions
that
have
been
classified
as
held
for
sale
or
as
discontinued
operations
for
periods
prior
to
our
adoption
of
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08,
we
will
continue
to
present
the
operating
results
as
discontinued
operations
in
the
statements
of
operations
for
all
applicable
periods
presented.
Disposed
Assets
Hotel
Acquisition
Date
Disposition
Date
Consideration
Gain
on
Disposition
Hotel
373
2014
Total
June
2007
April
2014
$
37,000
$
$
Non-‐Core
Portfolio
II
(12)
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Camp
Springs,
MD
January
1999
-‐
July
2010
December
2013
$
158,600
$
June
2008
September
2013
8,500
Comfort
Inn,
Harrisburg,
PA
January
1999
June
2013
3,700
2013
Total
Non-‐Core
Hotel
Portfolio
(18)
Land
Parcel,
Eighth
Ave,
Manhattan,
NY
Comfort
Inn,
North
Dartmouth,
MA
2012
Total
January
1999
-‐
July
2007
2012
$
155,000
$
February
2012
&
May
June
2006
May
2006
April
2012
19,250
March
2012
-‐
7,195
7,195
(1)
31,559
(2)
120
(3)
442
32,121
4,978
(4)
5,037
1,216
(5)
$
11,231
(1)
(2)
The
operations
from
this
property
included
(loss)
income
of
($137),
$858,
$546
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012,
respectively.
In
September
2013,
our
Board
of
Trustees
authorized
management
of
the
Company
to
sell
this
portfolio.
On
September
20,
2013,
the
Company
entered
into
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
to
dispose
of
a
portfolio
of
16
non-‐core
hotel
properties,
for
an
aggregate
purchase
price
of
approximately
$217,000.
The
16
non-‐core
hotel
properties
in
the
portfolio
were
acquired
by
the
Company
between
1999
and
2010.
We
recorded
an
impairment
loss
of
approximately
$6,591
for
those
assets
for
which
the
anticipated
net
proceeds
do
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
On
December
20,
2013,
the
Company
closed
on
the
sale
of
12
of
these
non-‐core
hotel
properties.
As
a
result
of
entering
into
these
purchase
and
sale
agreements
for
the
16
non-‐core
assets
mentioned
above,
the
operating
results
for
the
consolidated
assets
were
reclassified
to
discontinued
operations
in
the
statement
of
operations
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012.
The
12
assets
were
sold
for
a
total
sales
price
of
$158,600,
reduced
the
Company’s
consolidated
mortgage
debt
by
$33,044
and
generated
a
gain
on
sale
of
approximately
$31,559.
In
February
2014,
the
remaining
4
assets
were
sold
for
a
total
sales
price
of
$58,400
and
reduced
the
Company’s
consolidated
mortgage
debt
by
$45,710.
We
recorded
an
impairment
loss
of
approximately
$1,800
for
those
assets
for
which
the
anticipated
net
proceeds
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
81
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
11
–
HOTEL
DISPOSITIONS
(CONTINUED)
(3)
(4)
(5)
We
recorded
an
impairment
loss
for
this
property
of
approximately
$3,723
as
the
net
proceeds
did
not
exceed
the
carrying
value.
On
February
23,
2012,
the
Company
closed
on
the
sale
of
14
non-‐core
hotel
properties,
including
three
hotel
properties
owned
in
part
by
the
Company
through
an
unconsolidated
joint
venture,
and
closed
on
the
remaining
four
properties,
on
May
8,
2012,
including
one
hotel
property
owned
in
part
by
the
Company
through
an
unconsolidated
joint
venture.
The
operating
results
for
the
consolidated
assets
were
reclassified
to
discontinued
operations
in
the
statement
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
The
18
assets
were
sold
for
a
total
sales
price
of
$155,000,
reduced
the
Company’s
consolidated
mortgage
debt
by
$61,298
and
generated
a
gain
on
sale
of
approximately
$4,978.
On
March
30,
2012,
we
transferred
the
title
to
the
Comfort
Inn,
located
in
North
Dartmouth,
to
the
lender.
Previously,
we
had
ceased
operations
at
this
property
on
March
31,
2011.
The
operating
results
were
reclassified
to
discontinued
operations
in
the
statements
of
operations
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2012.
The
transfer
of
the
title
resulted
in
a
gain
of
approximately
$1,216,
since
the
outstanding
mortgage
loan
payable
exceeded
the
net
book
value
of
the
property.
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Assets
held
for
sale
or
liabilities
related
to
assets
held
for
sale
consisted
of
the
following
as
of
December
31,
2013:
Land
Buildings
and
Improvements
Furniture,
Fixtures
and
Equipment
Less:
Accumulated
Depreciation
&
Amortization
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Liabilities
Related
to
Assets
Held
for
Sale
December
31,
2013
$
$
$
9,517
58,129
9,198
76,844
(20,261)
56,583
45,835
82
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
11
–
HOTEL
DISPOSITIONS
(CONTINUED)
The
following
table
sets
forth
the
components
of
discontinued
operations
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013,
and
2012.
Discontinued
operations
include
the
results
of
operations
for
hotels
sold
in
2013
and
the
first
quarter
of
2014
(which
were
held
for
sale
as
of
December
31,
2013).
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
2014
2012
Revenue:
Hotel
Operating
Revenues
Other
Revenue
Total
Revenues
Expenses:
$
1,940
$
-‐
1,940
58,045
$
-‐
58,045
Hotel
Operating
Expenses
Gain
on
Insurance
Settlements
Hotel
Ground
Rent
Real
Estate
and
Personal
Property
Taxes
and
Property
Insurance
General
and
Administrative
Acquisition
and
Termination
Transaction
Costs
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Interest
Expense
Other
Expense
Loss
on
Debt
Extinguishment
Income
Tax
Expense
Total
Expenses
1,151
74
-‐
91
4
-‐
1
354
-‐
-‐
2
1,677
35,158
-‐
-‐
3,316
36
-‐
7,050
4,863
44
-‐
190
50,657
63,465
11
63,476
39,046
-‐
72
3,636
27
8
9,148
7,872
10
168
-‐
59,987
Income
from
Discontinued
Operations
$
263
$
7,388
$
3,489
We
allocate
to
income
or
loss
from
discontinued
operations
interest
expense
related
to
debt
that
is
to
be
assumed
or
that
is
required
to
be
repaid
as
a
result
of
the
disposal
transaction.
83
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
12
–
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
AND
NONCONTROLLING
INTERESTS
IN
PARTNERSHIP
Common
Shares
The
Company’s
outstanding
common
shares
have
been
duly
authorized,
and
are
fully
paid
and
non-‐assessable.
Common
shareholders
are
entitled
to
receive
dividends
if
and
when
authorized
and
declared
by
the
Board
of
Trustees
of
the
Company
out
of
assets
legally
available
and
to
share
ratably
in
the
assets
of
the
Company
legally
available
for
distribution
to
its
shareholders
in
the
event
of
its
liquidation,
dissolution
or
winding
up
after
payment
of,
or
adequate
provision
for,
all
known
debts
and
liabilities
of
the
Company.
Preferred
Shares
The
Declaration
of
Trust
authorizes
our
Board
of
Trustees
to
classify
any
unissued
preferred
shares
and
to
reclassify
any
previously
classified
but
unissued
preferred
shares
of
any
series
from
time
to
time
in
one
or
more
series,
as
authorized
by
the
Board
of
Trustees.
Prior
to
issuance
of
shares
of
each
series,
the
Board
of
Trustees
is
required
by
Maryland
REIT
Law
and
our
Declaration
of
Trust
to
set
for
each
such
series,
subject
to
the
provisions
of
our
Declaration
of
Trust
regarding
the
restriction
on
transfer
of
shares
of
beneficial
interest,
the
terms,
the
preferences,
conversion
or
other
rights,
voting
powers,
restrictions,
limitations
as
to
dividends
or
other
distributions,
qualifications
and
terms
or
conditions
of
redemption
for
each
such
series.
Thus,
our
Board
of
Trustees
could
authorize
the
issuance
of
additional
preferred
shares
with
terms
and
conditions
which
could
have
the
effect
of
delaying,
deferring
or
preventing
a
transaction
or
a
change
in
control
in
us
that
might
involve
a
premium
price
for
holders
of
common
shares
or
otherwise
be
in
their
best
interest.
Common
Units
Common
Units
are
issued
in
connection
with
the
acquisition
of
wholly
owned
hotels
and
joint
venture
interests
in
hotel
properties.
The
total
number
of
Common
Units
outstanding
as
of
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
was
6,849,412,
6,914,716,
and
7,112,506,
respectively.
These
units
can
be
redeemed
for
cash
or
converted
to
common
shares,
at
the
Company’s
option,
on
a
one-‐for-‐one
basis.
The
number
of
common
shares
issuable
upon
exercise
of
the
redemption
rights
will
be
adjusted
upon
the
occurrence
of
stock
splits,
mergers,
consolidation
or
similar
pro
rata
share
transactions,
that
otherwise
would
have
the
effect
of
diluting
the
ownership
interest
of
the
limited
partners
or
our
shareholders.
During
2014,
2013
and
2012,
18,900,
27,790,
and
157,810
Common
Units
were
converted
to
common
shares,
respectively.
The
Company
redeemed
46,404
Common
Units
for
$338
during
2014.
In
addition,
as
noted
in
“Note
8
–
Share
Based
Payments,”
during
2014,
the
Company
issued
1,948,324
of
LTIP
Units.
84
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
13
–
INCOME
TAXES
The
Company
elected
to
be
taxed
as
a
REIT
under
Sections
856
through
860
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
commencing
with
its
taxable
year
ended
December
31,
1999.
To
qualify
as
a
REIT,
the
Company
must
meet
a
number
of
organizational
and
operational
requirements,
including
a
requirement
that
it
currently
distribute
at
least
90%
of
its
REIT
taxable
income
to
its
shareholders.
It
is
the
Company’s
current
intention
to
adhere
to
these
requirements
and
maintain
the
Company’s
qualification
for
taxation
as
a
REIT.
As
a
REIT,
the
Company
generally
will
not
be
subject
to
federal
corporate
income
tax
on
that
portion
of
its
net
income
that
is
currently
distributed
to
shareholders.
If
the
Company
fails
to
qualify
for
taxation
as
a
REIT
in
any
taxable
year,
it
will
be
subject
to
federal
income
taxes
at
regular
corporate
rates
(including
any
applicable
alternative
minimum
tax)
and
may
not
be
able
to
qualify
as
a
REIT
for
four
subsequent
taxable
years.
Even
if
the
Company
qualifies
for
taxation
as
a
REIT,
the
Company
may
be
subject
to
certain
state
and
local
taxes
on
its
income
and
property,
and
to
federal
income
and
excise
taxes
on
its
undistributed
taxable
income.
Taxable
income
from
non-‐REIT
activities
managed
through
taxable
REIT
subsidiaries
is
subject
to
federal,
state
and
local
income
taxes.
44
New
England
is
subject
to
income
taxes
at
the
applicable
federal,
state
and
local
tax
rates.
The
provision
for
income
taxes
differs
from
the
amount
of
income
tax
determined
by
applying
the
applicable
U.S.
statutory
federal
income
tax
rate
to
pretax
income
from
continuing
operations
as
a
result
of
the
following
differences:
Statutory
federal
income
tax
provision
Adjustment
for
nontaxable
loss
State
income
taxes,
net
of
federal
income
tax
effect
Recognition
of
deferred
tax
assets
Changes
in
valuation
allowance
$
(25,274)
(367)
91
-‐
5,152
$
(7,472)
(1,317)
(1,963)
-‐
1,409
(623)
151
-‐
(4,292)
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
2012
2014
22,865
$
Total
income
tax
benefit
$
(2,685)
$
(5,600)
$
(3,355)
The
components
of
the
Company’s
income
tax
expense
(benefit)
from
continuing
operations
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
were
as
follows:
For
the
year
ended
December
31,
2013
2014
2012
Income
tax
expense
(benefit):
Current:
Federal
State
Deferred:
Federal
State
Total
Income
tax
expense
(benefit):
From
continuing
operations
From
discontinued
operations
Total
$
$
-‐
$
-‐
-‐
$
-‐
-‐
229
(2,130)
(555)
(2,685)
$
(3,604)
(1,996)
(5,600)
$
(3,584)
-‐
(3,355)
$
(2,685)
2
(2,683)
$
(5,600)
190
(5,410)
$
(3,355)
-‐
(3,355)
85
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
13
–
INCOME
TAXES
(CONTINUED)
The
components
of
consolidated
TRS’s
net
deferred
tax
asset
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
2013
were
as
follows:
Deferred
tax
assets:
Net
operating
loss
carryforwards
Accrued
expenses
and
other
Tax
credit
carryforwards
Total
gross
deferred
tax
assets
Valuation
allowance
Total
net
deferred
tax
assets
Deferred
tax
liabilities:
Depreciation
and
amortization
Total
Net
deferred
tax
assets
(liabilities)
As
of
December
31,
2014
2013
$
$
$
11,387
616
481
12,484
(804)
11,680
232
11,448
$
$
$
8,605
685
280
9,570
(804)
8,766
-‐
8,766
In
assessing
the
realizability
of
deferred
tax
assets,
management
considers
whether
it
is
more
likely
than
not
that
some
portion
or
all
of
the
deferred
tax
assets
will
not
be
realized.
Based
on
limitations
related
to
the
utilization
of
certain
tax
attribute
carryforwards,
the
Company
recorded
a
valuation
allowance
of
approximately
$804
as
these
attributes
are
not
more
likely
than
not
to
be
realized
prior
to
their
expiration.
Based
on
the
level
of
historical
taxable
income,
tax
planning
strategies
and
projections
for
future
taxable
income
over
the
periods
in
which
the
remaining
deferred
tax
assets
are
deductible,
Management
believes
it
is
more
likely
than
not
that
the
remaining
deferred
tax
assets
will
be
realized.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
have
gross
federal
net
operating
loss
carryforwards
of
$28,732
which
expire
over
various
periods
from
2023
through
2034.
As
of
December
31,
2014,
we
have
gross
state
net
operating
loss
carryforwards
of
$30,868
which
expire
over
various
periods
from
2014
to
2034.
The
Company
has
tax
credits
of
$481
available
which
begin
to
expire
in
2028.
Earnings
and
profits,
which
will
determine
the
taxability
of
distributions
to
shareholders,
will
differ
from
net
income
reported
for
financial
reporting
purposes
due
to
the
differences
for
federal
tax
purposes
in
the
estimated
useful
lives
and
methods
used
to
compute
depreciation.
The
following
table
sets
forth
certain
per
share
information
regarding
the
Company’s
common
and
preferred
share
distributions
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012.
2014
2013
2012
Preferred
Shares
-‐
8%
Series
A
Ordinary
income
Return
of
Capital
Capital
Gain
Distribution
Preferred
Shares
-‐
8%
Series
B
Ordinary
income
Return
of
Capital
Capital
Gain
Distribution
Preferred
Shares
-‐
6.875%
Series
C
Ordinary
income
Return
of
Capital
Capital
Gain
Distribution
Common
Shares
-‐
Class
A
Ordinary
income
Return
of
Capital
Capital
Gain
Distribution
86
N/A
N/A
N/A
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
76.34%
23.66%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
45.15%
54.85%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.28%
98.72%
0.00%
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended december 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012
[in thousands, except share/unit and per share amounts]
NOTE
14
–
SELECTED
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL
DATA
(UNAUDITED)
Year
Ended
December
31,
2014
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Total
Revenues
Total
Expenses
$
80,348
$
85,203
111,830
$
53,593
Fourth
Quarter
112,985
106,232
113,048
$
106,625
(Loss)
Income
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
(Loss)
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
(420)
(5,275)
419
58,656
607
7,030
87
6,840
Income
Tax
Benefit
Income
(Loss)
from
Discontinued
Operations
(including
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Discontinued
Assets)*
Net
(Loss)
Income
(Loss)
Income
Allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
in
Continuing
Operations
Issuance
Costs
of
Redeemed
Preferred
Stock
Preferred
Distributions
Net
(Loss)
Income
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Basic
and
diluted
earnings
per
share:
(Loss)
Income
from
continuing
operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders
Discontinued
Operations
Net
(Loss)
Income
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
$
$
$
108
(1)
699
1,879
(1,346)
(6,513)
(507)
-‐
3,589
(69)
58,586
1,655
-‐
3,589
(142)
7,587
(49)
-‐
3,589
(9,595)
$
53,342
$
4,047
$
(0.04)
$
0.27
$
0.02
$
(0.01)
0.00
0.00
(0.05)
$
0.27
$
0.02
$
(108)
8,611
(83)
-‐
3,589
5,105
0.03
0.00
0.03
Basic
Diluted
Total
Revenues
Total
Expenses
(Loss)
Income
from
Unconsolidated
Joint
Ventures
(Loss)
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
200,743,751
198,494,473
198,597,517
198,629,945
200,743,751
200,213,554
200,621,986
200,779,472
Year
Ended
December
31,
2013
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
$
65,878
$
91,068
$
90,741
$
92,510
73,174
(396)
(7,692)
71,703
148
19,513
87,512
227
3,456
90,820
(1,814)
(124)
Income
Tax
Benefit
(Loss)
Income
from
Discontinued
Operations
(including
Gain
on
Disposition
of
Discontinued
Assets)
Net
(Loss)
Income
1,129
(1,222)
2,375
3,318
(1,113)
(7,676)
(206)
18,085
(3,532)
2,299
34,046
37,240
(Loss)
Income
Allocated
to
Noncontrolling
Interests
in
Continuing
Operations
Extinguishment
of
Issuance
Costs
Upon
Redemption
of
Series
A
Preferred
Shares
Preferred
Distributions
Net
(Loss)
Income
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Basic
and
diluted
earnings
per
share:
(Loss)
Income
from
continuing
operations
applicable
to
common
shareholders
Discontinued
Operations
Net
Loss
(Income)
applicable
to
Common
Shareholders
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
Basic
Diluted
*
(673)
210
(164)
962
2,250
3,844
-‐
-‐
-‐
3,589
3,589
3,589
(13,097)
$
14,286
$
(1,126)
$
32,689
(0.07)
$
0.00
(0.07)
$
0.08
$
(0.01)
0.01
$
(0.02)
0.07
$
(0.01)
$
0.00
0.16
0.16
$
$
$
197,029,017
198,633,051
198,878,496
198,944,277
197,029,017
201,201,337
201,644,633
198,944,277
Effective
January
1,
2014,
we
early
adopted
ASU
Update
No.
2014-‐08
concerning
the
classification
and
reporting
of
discontinued
operations.
As
such,
this
line
item
for
quarterly
results
presented
for
2014
will
not
be
comparable.
87
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
schedule iii – real estate and accumulated depreciation as of december 31, 2014
[in thousands]
Initial
Costs
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
Gross
Amounts
at
which
Carrried
at
Close
of
Period
Accumulated
Depreciation
Net
Book
Value
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings
&
Improvements
Land
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Improvements
Land
Improvements
Total
Buildings
&
Improvements*
Land,
Buildings
&
Improvements
Date
of
Acquisition
Residence
Inn,
Framingham,
MA
Hampton
Inn,
New
York,
NY
Residence
Inn,
Greenbelt,
MD
Courtyard,
Brookline,
MA
Residence
Inn,
Tyson's
Corner,
VA
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
JFK
Airport,
NY
Hawthorne
Suites,
Franklin,
MA
Holiday
Inn
Exp,
Cambridge,
MA
Residence
Inn,
Norwood,
MA
Hampton
Inn,
Chelsea,
NY
Hyatt
House,
Gaithersburg,
MD
Hyatt
House,
Pleasant
Hills,
CA
Hyatt
House,
Pleasanton,
CA
Hyatt
House,
Scottsdale,
AZ
Hyatt
House,
White
Plains,
NY
Holiday
Inn
Exp
&
Suites,
Chester,
NY
1,325
12,737
-‐
4,844
1,325
17,581
18,906
($4,860)
14,046
03/26/04
(23,026)
5,472
23,280
-‐
1,458
5,472
24,738
30,210
(6,703)
23,507
04/01/05
2,615
14,815
-‐
2,250
2,615
17,065
19,680
(5,021)
14,659
07/16/04
(36,453)
-‐
47,414
-‐
1,554
-‐
48,968
48,968
(12,438)
36,530
06/16/05
4,283
14,475
-‐
1,920
4,283
16,395
20,678
(4,113)
16,565
02/02/06
(19,707)
-‐
25,018
-‐
2,618
-‐
27,636
27,636
(6,770)
20,866
02/16/06
(7,520)
1,872
8,968
-‐
505
1,872
9,473
11,345
(2,211)
9,134
04/25/06
1,956
9,793
-‐
2,352
1,956
12,145
14,101
(3,469)
10,632
05/03/06
1,970
11,761
-‐
1,482
1,970
13,243
15,213
(2,904)
12,309
07/27/06
(33,696)
8,905
33,500
-‐
1,944
8,905
35,444
44,349
(8,215)
36,134
09/29/06
(13,720)
2,912
16,001
-‐
3,812
2,912
19,813
22,725
(4,616)
18,109
12/28/06
(20,160)
6,216
17,229
-‐
2,996
6,216
20,225
26,441
(4,200)
22,241
12/28/06
(14,490)
3,941
12,560
-‐
3,497
3,941
16,057
19,998
(3,815)
16,183
12/28/06
(16,778)
3,060
19,968
-‐
3,408
3,060
23,376
26,436
(5,575)
20,861
12/28/06
(33,030)
8,823
30,273
-‐
2,700
8,823
32,973
41,796
(7,501)
34,295
12/28/06
(6,264)
1,500
6,671
-‐
242
1,500
6,913
8,413
(1,404)
7,009
01/25/07
(1)
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
include
reductions
of
asset
value
due
to
impairment.
88
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
schedule iii – real estate and accumulated depreciation as of december 31, 2014
[in thousands]
Initial
Costs
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
Gross
Amounts
at
which
Carrried
at
Close
of
Period
Accumulated
Depreciation
Net
Book
Value
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Improvements
Land
Improvements
Land
Improvements
Total
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Improvements*
Land,
Buildings
&
Improvements
Date
of
Acquisition
Hampton
Inn,
Seaport,
NY
Sheraton
Hotel,
JFK
Airport,
NY
Hampton
Inn,
Philadelphia,
PA
Duane
Street,
Tribeca,
NY
NU
Hotel,
Brooklyn,
NY
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
Tribeca,
NY
Hampton
Inn,
Times
Square,
NY
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Times
Square,
NY
Candlewood
Suites,
Times
Square,
NY
Hyatt
Place,
KOP,
PA
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Wall
Street,
NY
Hampton
Inn,
Washington,
DC
Courtyard,
Alexandria,
VA
Sheraton,
Wilmington
South,
DE
Holiday
Inn,
Water
Street,
NY
(17,764)
7,816
19,040
-‐
811
7,816
19,851
27,667
(4,049)
23,618
02/01/07
-‐
27,315
-‐
1,430
-‐
28,745
28,745
(4,877)
23,868
06/13/08
3,490
24,382
-‐
5,914
3,490
30,296
33,786
(10,619)
23,167
02/15/06
(9,352)
8,213
12,869
-‐
1,276
8,213
14,145
22,358
(2,883)
19,475
01/04/08
-‐
22,042
-‐
1,515
-‐
23,557
23,557
(3,947)
19,610
01/14/08
(46,500)
21,077
42,955
-‐
583
21,077
43,538
64,615
(6,222)
58,393
05/01/09
10,691
41,637
-‐
316
10,691
41,953
52,644
(5,163)
47,481
02/09/10
11,075
43,113
-‐
54
11,075
43,167
54,242
(5,288)
48,954
02/09/10
10,281
36,687
-‐
44
10,281
36,731
47,012
(4,491)
42,521
02/09/10
1,133
7,267
-‐
4,012
1,133
11,279
12,412
(4,436)
7,976
08/17/10
12,152
21,100
-‐
323
12,152
21,423
33,575
(2,526)
31,049
05/09/10
9,335
58,048
-‐
1,191
9,335
59,239
68,574
(6,651)
61,923
09/01/10
(23,403)
6,376
26,089
-‐
2,555
6,376
28,644
35,020
(6,701)
28,319
09/29/06
1,765
16,929
-‐
1,187
1,765
18,116
19,881
(2,902)
16,979
12/21/10
7,341
28,591
-‐
326
7,341
28,917
36,258
(2,415)
33,843
03/25/11
(1)
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
include
reductions
of
asset
value
due
to
impairment.
89
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
schedule iii – real estate and accumulated depreciation as of december 31, 2014
[in thousands]
Initial
Costs
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
Gross
Amounts
at
which
Carrried
at
Close
of
Period
Accumulated
Depreciation
Net
Book
Value
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Improvements
Land
Improvements
Land
Improvements
Total
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Buildings
&
Improvements*
Land,
Buildings
&
Improvements
Date
of
Acquisition
Capitol
Hill
Suites
Washington,
DC
Courtyard,
LA
Westside,
CA
Hampton
Inn,
Pearl
Street,
NY
Courtyard,
Miami,
FL
The
Rittenhouse
Hotel,
PA
Bulfinch,
Boston,
MA
Holiday
Inn
Express,
Manhattan,
NY
Hyatt,
Union
Square,
NY
Courtyard,
San
Diego,
CA
Residence
Inn,
Coconut
Grove,
FL
Hotel
Milo,
Santa
Barbara,
CA
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
Midtown
East,
NY
(26,639)
8,095
35,141
-‐
3,874
8,095
39,015
47,110
(4,318)
42,792
04/15/11
(30,000)
13,489
27,025
-‐
4,531
13,489
31,556
45,045
(3,142)
41,903
05/19/11
11,384
23,432
-‐
480
11,384
23,912
35,296
(295)
35,001
07/22/11
(60,000)
35,699
55,805
-‐
22,163
35,699
77,968
113,667
(5,080)
108,587
11/16/11
7,108
29,556
-‐
13,661
7,108
43,217
50,325
(4,819)
45,506
03/01/12
1,456
14,954
-‐
1,448
1,456
16,402
17,858
(1,338)
16,520
05/07/12
30,329
57,016
-‐
731
30,329
57,747
88,076
(3,805)
84,271
06/18/12
(55,000)
32,940
79,300
-‐
759
32,940
80,059
112,999
(3,499)
109,500
04/09/13
15,656
51,674
-‐
274
15,656
51,948
67,604
(2,061)
65,543
05/30/13
4,146
17,456
-‐
5,107
4,146
22,563
26,709
(953)
25,756
06/12/13
(24,577)
-‐
55,080
-‐
193
-‐
55,273
55,273
(1,156)
54,117
02/28/14
(45,000)
45,480
60,762
-‐
21
45,480
60,783
106,263
(908)
105,355
05/27/14
(1)
Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
include
reductions
of
asset
value
due
to
impairment.
90
hersha hospitality trust and subsidiaries
schedule iii – real estate and accumulated depreciation as of december 31, 2014
[in thousands]
Initial
Costs
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
Gross
Amounts
at
which
Carrried
at
Close
of
Period
Accumulated
Depreciation
Net
Book
Value
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings
&
Improvements
Land
Buildings
&
Improvements
Land
Buildings
&
Improvements
Total
Buildings
&
Improvements*
Land,
Buildings
&
Improvements
Date
of
Acquisition
Parrot
Key
Hotel,
Key
West,
FL
Winter
Haven
Hotel,
Miami
Beach,
FL
Blue
Moon
Hotel,
Miami
Beach,
FL
Total
Investment
in
Real
Estate
$
-‐
57,889
33,959
-‐
54
57,889
34,014
91,903
(555)
91,348
05/07/14
-‐
5,400
18,147
-‐
110
5,400
18,258
23,658
(477)
23,181
12/20/13
-‐
4,874
20,354
-‐
127
4,873
20,482
25,354
(498)
24,856
12/20/13
(563,079)
439,540
1,312,189
-‐
112,653
439,540
1,424,842
1,864,382
($189,889)
1,674,493
*
Assets
are
depreciated
over
a
7
to
40
year
life,
upon
which
the
latest
income
statement
is
computed
The
aggregate
cost
of
land,
buildings
and
improvements
for
Federal
income
tax
purposes
for
the
years
ended
December
31,
2014,
2013
and
2012
is
approximately
$1,836,861,
$1,575,555,
and
$1,278,318
respectively.
Depreciation
is
computed
for
buildings
and
improvements
using
a
useful
life
for
these
assets
of
7
to
40
years.
See
Accompanying
Report
of
Independent
Registered
Public
Accounting
Firm
2014
2013
2012
Reconciliation
of
Real
Estate
Balance
at
beginning
of
year
Additions
during
the
year
Dispositions/Deconsolidation
of
consolidated
joint
venture
during
the
year
Changes/Impairments
in
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Total
Real
Estate
$
1,629,312
$
1,520,151
$
1,481,433
167,916
333,889
275,032
(98,819)
-‐
(127,992)
(1,206)
$
1,864,382
$
1,629,312
$
1,520,151
(156,504)
(9,367)
Reconciliation
of
Accumulated
Depreciation
Balance
at
beginning
of
year
Depreciation
for
year
Changes/Impairments
in
Assets
Held
for
Sale
Accumulated
depreciation
on
assets
sold
Balance
at
the
end
of
year
$
162,189
$
150,353
$
43,218
-‐
(15,518)
189,889
$
39,771
51
(27,986)
162,189
$
$
139,057
35,597
-‐
(24,301)
150,353
91
annual report 2014
Item
9.
Changes
in
and
Disagreements
with
Accountants
on
Accounting
and
Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item
9A.
Controls
and
Procedures
EVALUATION
OF
DISCLOSURE
CONTROLS
AND
PROCEDURES
Under
the
supervision
and
with
the
participation
of
our
management,
including
our
Chief
Executive
Officer
and
Chief
Financial
Officer,
we
conducted
an
evaluation
of
our
disclosure
controls
and
procedures,
as
such
term
is
defined
under
Rule
13a-‐15(e)
promulgated
under
the
Securities
Exchange
Act
of
1934,
as
amended
(the
Exchange
Act),
as
of
the
end
of
the
period
covered
by
this
report.
Based
on
that
evaluation,
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
and
Chief
Financial
Officer
concluded
that
our
disclosure
controls
and
procedures
as
of
the
end
of
the
period
covered
by
this
report
are
functioning
effectively
to
provide
reasonable
assurance
that
the
information
required
to
be
disclosed
by
us
in
reports
filed
under
the
Securities
Exchange
Act
of
1934
is
(i)
recorded,
processed,
summarized
and
reported
within
the
time
periods
specified
in
the
SEC’s
rules
and
forms
and
(ii)
accumulated
and
communicated
to
our
management,
including
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
and
Chief
Financial
Officer,
as
appropriate
to
allow
timely
decisions
regarding
disclosure.
A
control
system
cannot
provide
absolute
assurance,
however,
that
the
objectives
of
the
controls
system
are
met,
and
no
evaluation
of
controls
can
provide
absolute
assurance
that
all
control
issues
and
instances
of
fraud,
if
any,
within
a
company
have
been
detected.
MANAGEMENT’S
ANNUAL
REPORT
ON
INTERNAL
CONTROL
OVER
FINANCIAL
REPORTING
The
Company’s
management
is
responsible
for
establishing
and
maintaining
adequate
internal
control
over
financial
reporting,
as
defined
within
Exchange
Act
Rules
13a-‐15(f)
and
15d-‐15(f).
Internal
control
over
financial
reporting
refers
to
the
processes
designed
to
provide
reasonable
assurance
regarding
the
reliability
of
financial
reporting
and
the
preparation
of
financial
statements
for
external
purposes
in
accordance
with
generally
accepted
accounting
principles,
and
includes
policies
and
procedures
that:
•
•
•
pertain
to
the
maintenance
of
records
that,
in
reasonable
detail,
accurately
and
fairly
reflect
the
transactions
and
dispositions
of
the
assets
of
the
Company;
provide
reasonable
assurance
that
transactions
are
recorded
as
necessary
to
permit
preparation
of
financial
statements
in
accordance
with
generally
accepted
accounting
principles,
and
that
receipts
and
expenditures
of
the
Company
are
being
made
only
in
accordance
with
authorizations
of
management
and
directors
of
the
Company;
and
provide
reasonable
assurance
regarding
prevention
or
timely
detection
of
unauthorized
acquisition,
use,
or
disposition
of
the
Company’s
assets
that
could
have
a
material
effect
on
the
financial
statements.
Because
of
its
inherent
limitations,
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
may
not
prevent
or
detect
misstatements.
Also,
projections
of
any
evaluation
of
effectiveness
to
future
periods
are
subject
to
the
risk
that
controls
may
become
inadequate
because
of
changes
in
conditions,
or
that
the
degree
of
compliance
with
the
policies
or
procedures
may
deteriorate.
Management
conducted
an
evaluation
of
the
effectiveness
of
the
Company’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
based
on
the
criteria
contained
in
Internal
Control
—
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued
by
the
Committee
of
Sponsoring
Organizations
(COSO)
of
the
Treadway
Commission
as
of
December
31,
2014.
Based
on
that
evaluation,
management
has
concluded
that,
as
of
December
31,
2014,
the
Company’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
was
effective
based
on
those
criteria.
The
effectiveness
of
our
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
as
of
December
31,
2014
has
been
audited
by
KPMG
LLP,
an
independent
registered
public
accounting
firm,
as
stated
in
their
attestation
report
which
is
included
herein.
92
hersha hospitality trust
Report
of
Independent
Registered
Public
Accounting
Firm
The
Board
of
Trustees
and
Shareholders
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust:
We
have
audited
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
and
subsidiaries’
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
as
of
December
31,
2014,
based
on
criteria
established
in
Internal
Control
-‐
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued
by
the
Committee
of
Sponsoring
Organizations
of
the
Treadway
Commission
(COSO).
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust's
management
is
responsible
for
maintaining
effective
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
and
for
its
assessment
of
the
effectiveness
of
internal
control
over
financial
reporting,
included
in
the
accompanying
Management’s
Annual
Report
on
Internal
Control
Over
Financial
Reporting.
Our
responsibility
is
to
express
an
opinion
on
the
Company’s
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
based
on
our
audit.
We
conducted
our
audit
in
accordance
with
the
standards
of
the
Public
Company
Accounting
Oversight
Board
(United
States).
Those
standards
require
that
we
plan
and
perform
the
audit
to
obtain
reasonable
assurance
about
whether
effective
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
was
maintained
in
all
material
respects.
Our
audit
included
obtaining
an
understanding
of
internal
control
over
financial
reporting,
assessing
the
risk
that
a
material
weakness
exists,
and
testing
and
evaluating
the
design
and
operating
effectiveness
of
internal
control
based
on
the
assessed
risk.
Our
audit
also
included
performing
such
other
procedures
as
we
considered
necessary
in
the
circumstances.
We
believe
that
our
audit
provides
a
reasonable
basis
for
our
opinion.
A
company's
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
is
a
process
designed
to
provide
reasonable
assurance
regarding
the
reliability
of
financial
reporting
and
the
preparation
of
financial
statements
for
external
purposes
in
accordance
with
generally
accepted
accounting
principles.
A
company's
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
includes
those
policies
and
procedures
that
(1)
pertain
to
the
maintenance
of
records
that,
in
reasonable
detail,
accurately
and
fairly
reflect
the
transactions
and
dispositions
of
the
assets
of
the
company;
(2)
provide
reasonable
assurance
that
transactions
are
recorded
as
necessary
to
permit
preparation
of
financial
statements
in
accordance
with
generally
accepted
accounting
principles,
and
that
receipts
and
expenditures
of
the
company
are
being
made
only
in
accordance
with
authorizations
of
management
and
directors
of
the
company;
and
(3)
provide
reasonable
assurance
regarding
prevention
or
timely
detection
of
unauthorized
acquisition,
use,
or
disposition
of
the
company’s
assets
that
could
have
a
material
effect
on
the
financial
statements.
Because
of
its
inherent
limitations,
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
may
not
prevent
or
detect
misstatements.
Also,
projections
of
any
evaluation
of
effectiveness
to
future
periods
are
subject
to
the
risk
that
controls
may
become
inadequate
because
of
changes
in
conditions,
or
that
the
degree
of
compliance
with
the
policies
or
procedures
may
deteriorate.
In
our
opinion,
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
maintained,
in
all
material
respects,
effective
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
as
of
December
31,
2014,
based
on
criteria
established
in
Internal
Control
-‐
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued
by
the
Committee
of
Sponsoring
Organizations
of
the
Treadway
Commission
(COSO).
We
also
have
audited,
in
accordance
with
the
standards
of
the
Public
Company
Accounting
Oversight
Board
(United
States),
the
consolidated
balance
sheets
of
Hersha
Hospitality
Trust
as
of
December
31,
2014
and
2013,
and
the
related
consolidated
statements
of
operations,
comprehensive
income,
equity,
and
cash
flows
for
each
of
the
years
in
the
three-‐year
period
ended
December
31,
2014,
and
our
report
dated
February
20,
2015
expressed
an
unqualified
opinion
on
those
consolidated
financial
statements.
/s/
KPMG
LLP
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
February
20,
2015
93
annual report 2014
CHANGES
IN
INTERNAL
CONTROL
OVER
FINANCIAL
REPORTING
There
were
no
changes
in
our
internal
control
over
financial
reporting
during
the
quarter
ended
December
31,
2014,
that
have
materially
affected,
or
are
reasonably
likely
to
materially
affect,
our
internal
control
over
financial
reporting.
94
2014 financial highlights
(In thousands, except per share data)
consolidated hotel
operating results
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Year Ended December 31,
hotel operating revenues
average daily rate
occupancy
revenue per available room
$
$
$
417,226
338,064
299,005
229,156
184,998
187.82
82.6%
155.19
179.70
79.7%
143.30
175.23
78.6%
137.78
166.58
76.6%
127.64
157.11
76.7%
120.52
(In thousands, except per share data)
hersha hospitality trust
operating data: (Excluding Impairment Charges) (1)
2014
2013
Year Ended December 31,
2012
2011
2010
$
Total Revenues (Including Discontinued Operations)
Net Income applicable to Common Shareholders
Adjusted EBITDA(2) (4)
Adjusted Funds from Operations (3) (4)
419,346
54,638
162,506
102,832
396,458
44,467
145,064
86,487
364,690
8,376
143,291
76,046
329,868
)
(5,133
132,969
68,710
283,597
)
(18,871
108,329
52,067
per share data: (Excluding Impairment Charges) (1)
$
Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
AFFO
Distributions to Common Shareholders
0.27
0.49
0.26
0.22
0.41
0.24
0.04
0.38
0.24
)
(0.03
0.38
0.23
)
(0.14
0.36
0.20
balance sheet data: (as of December 31st)
Total Assets
Total Debt
Noncontrolling Interest in Partnership
Total Shareholder’s Equity
$
1,855,539
918,923
28,007
829,382
1,748,097
819,336
29,181
837,958
1,707,679
792,708
31,281
829,828
1,630,909
820,132
32,124
730,671
1,457,277
694,720
39,778
683,434
(1) Operating and Per Share Data exclude charges recorded during 2010-2014 relating to impairment losses on investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and assets
held for sale.
(2) Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, and Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) is a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of the Securities and
Exchange Commission rules. Our interpretation of Adjusted EBITDA is that EBITDA derived from our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures should be added back to
net income (loss) as part of reconciling net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA. Our Adjusted EBITDA computation may not be comparable to EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA
reported by other companies that interpret the definition of EBITDA differently than we do. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA to be a meaningful measure of a REIT's
performance because it is widely followed by industry analysts, lenders and investors and that it should be considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income,
cash flow, FFO and AFFO as a measure of the company's operating performance.
(3) Funds from Operations (FFO) as defined by NAREIT represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding
extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated assets, plus certain non-cash items, such as loss from impairment of
assets and depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We present Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO),
which reflects FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition plus the following additional adjustments: adding back write-offs of deferred financing costs on debt
extinguishment, both for consolidated and unconsolidated properties, adding back amortization of deferred financing costs, adding back non-cash stock expense, adding
back acquisition and terminated transaction expenses, adding back preferred share extinguishment costs, adding back prior period tax assessment expenses, adding back
FFO attributed to our partners in consolidated joint ventures, and making adjustments to ground lease payments, which are required by GAAP to be amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease, to reflect the actual lease payment.
(4) In these financial highlights and in the Letter to Shareholders from our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer that follows, we present
non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, hotel EBITDA, FFO and AFFO. We have provided reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to
the applicable GAAP measures in the appendix section that follows the letter to our shareholders, in portions of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014, which accompanies this Letter or can be viewed at www.hersha.com, under “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.” Because hotel EBITDA is specific to individual hotels or groups of hotels and not to our Company as a whole, it is not directly comparable to any
GAAP measure and should not be relied on as a measure of performance for our portfolio of hotels taken as a whole.
HERSHA
hersha hospitality trust
corporate headquarters
44 Hersha Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17102
Telephone: (717) 236-4400
Fax: (717) 774-7383
executive offices
One Washington Square
510 Walnut Street, 9th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Telephone: (215) 238-1046
Fax: (215) 238-0157
corporate/securities counsel
Hunton & Williams LLP
independent auditors
KPMG LLP
registrar & stock
transfer agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
common stock information
The Common Stock of Hersha Hospitality Trust
is traded on The New York Stock Exchange
under the Symbol “HT”.
management certifications
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer provided certifications to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and these certifications are
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, as required
by Section 303A.12(a) of The New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) Listed Company Manual, on June 22, 2014, the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer submitted to the NYSE
the annual CEO certification regarding the Company’s
compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing
standards.
annual report on form 10-k
Shareholders may obtain a copy of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission free of charge (except for exhibits),
by writing to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Hersha
Hospitality Trust, 44 Hersha Drive, Harrisburg, PA; or, visit
the Company’s website at www.hersha.com and refer to
the Company’s SEC Filings.
annual meeting
The annual meeting of shareholders of Hersha Hospitality
Trust will be held at 9:00 A.M. (EDT) on Thursday, May 21,
2015 at One Washington Square, 510 Walnut Street, 9th
Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
board of trustees
Hasu P. Shah
Chairman,
Hersha Hospitality Trust
Jay H. Shah
Chief Executive Officer,
Hersha Hospitality Trust
Donald J. Landry
Lead Director, Hersha Hospitality Trust
Former President & CEO, Sunburst Hospitality Inc.
Michael A. Leven
Former President and Chief Operating Officer,
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Thomas J. Hutchison III
Former CEO,
CNL Hotels & Resorts
and CNL Retirement Properties, Inc.
Dianna F. Morgan
Former Senior Vice President,
Walt Disney World Co.
John M. Sabin
Executive Vice President and CFO,
Revolution LLC. and Case Foundation
management team
Jay H. Shah
Chief Executive Officer
Neil H. Shah
President and Chief Operating Officer
Ashish R. Parikh
Chief Financial Officer
Michael R. Gillespie
Chief Accounting Officer
David L. Desfor
Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
William J. Walsh
Senior Vice President of Asset Management
Robert C. Hazard III
Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Development
Bennett Thomas
Vice President of Finance and Sustainability
HERSHA
hersha hospitality trust
h
e
r
s
h
a
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
t
y
t
r
u
s
t
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
4
2014
(cid:13)
(cid:13)
www.hersha.com
(cid:13)