Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Home Improvement / Huttig Building Products Inc.

Huttig Building Products Inc.

hbp · TSX Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker hbp
Exchange TSX
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Home Improvement
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2019 Annual Report · Huttig Building Products Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report 2019 

Message to Shareholders 

Dear Shareholders, 

I would like to begin by first acknowledging the Company’s dedicated staff and thanking you for your continuing support.  
At the beginning of 2019, we set out to complete a number of major clinical development milestones and key corporate 
objectives.  Despite tight financial constraints throughout the fiscal year, we managed to position the company to move 
forward. 

In clinical development: 

 

 

 

 

Phase I/II L-DOS47 monotherapy clinical study final study report is almost ready, and a scientific paper 
is being prepared for publication; 

Patient enrollment in the Phase I dose escalation study of L-DOS47 in combination with pemetrexed 
and carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer patients has come to and end.  Fourteen (14) patients 
were dosed, of which, six (6) patients had a partial response.  The full data report is expected to be 
available no later than the first quarter of calendar 2020.  The Company is currently evaluating the 
possibility of launching a Phase II study to determine whether this combination can be considered as 
second line therapy in this indication; 

Phase II Study of L-DOS47 in combination with vinorelbine/cisplatin in lung adenocarcinoma began 
patient dosing in March 2019.  The Company expects dose escalation to be completed by the end of 
calendar 2019.  Randomized portion of the study may start in the new year pending dose escalation 
results and other factors such as financial resources; 

In August 2019, the Company received US Food and Drug Administration acceptance to start a Phase 
Ib/II study in pancreatic cancer of L-DOS47 in combination with doxorubicin.  The Company plans to 
enrol approximately twenty (20) patients in this study which has been designed to demonstrate the 
potential utility of L-DOS47 in a second indication other than for lung cancer. 

In corporate development: 

 

 

The Company has begun discussions with various capital firms, both in the US and Canada, to assist 
in an equity raise that would qualify the Company to list on a US Exchange such as NASDAQ. 

The  company  recently  divested  25%  of  its  interests  in  Helix  Immuno-Oncology  S.A.  (“HIO”).    The 
Company intends to fully divest its remaining interests in HIO. 

I personally feel 2020 will be an exciting year.  The Company is looking to expands its footprint in the U.S. and consolidate 
it leading position as the only Company with a clinical compound that treats cancer by combating tumor acidosis. 

Sincerely, 
Heman Chao, PhD 
Chief Executive Officer 

This letter contains certain forward-looking statements. By their nature,  forward-looking statements require us to make 
assumptions and are  subject  to inherent  risks  and  uncertainties.  Please  refer to  the  caution  regarding  Forward-Looking 
Statements  and Information on page 1 of this Annual  Report for a discussion of such risks and uncertainties and the material 
factors and assumptions related to these statements. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

This  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations  (“MD&A”)  should  be  read  in 
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Helix BioPharma Corp. (the “Company” or “Helix”) for the years ended 
July 31,  2019 and 2018 and the accompanying notes thereto.  This MD&A is based on financial statements which have been 
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  All amounts are depicted in Canadian currency 
unless otherwise noted. 

Additional information relating to the Company can be found in the Company’s Annual Information Form, which is available on 
SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION  

This  MD&A  contains  forward-looking  information  (collectively,  “forward-looking  information”)  within  the  meaning  of  applicable 
Canadian  securities  laws.    Forward-looking  information  means  disclosure  regarding  possible  events,  conditions  or  financial 
performance  that  is  based  on  assumptions  about  future  economic  conditions  and  courses  of  action  and  includes  financial 
projections  and  estimates;  statements  regarding  plans,  goals,  objectives,  intentions  and  expectations  with  respect  to  the 
Company’s future business, operations, research and development, including the focus of the Company’s primary drug product 
candidate  L-DOS47  and  other  information  relating  to  future  periods.    Forward-looking  information  includes,  without  limitation, 
statements  concerning  (i)  the  Company’s  ability  to  continue  to  operate  on  a  going  concern  basis  being  dependent  mainly  on 
obtaining additional financing; (ii) the Company’s growth and future prospects being dependent mainly on the success of L-DOS47; 
(iii) the Company’s priority continuing to be L-DOS47; (iv) the Company’s development programs, including but not limited to, 
extension of the current drug candidate(s) to other indications and the identification and development of further tumour-targeting 
antibodies for DOS47; (v) the nature, design and anticipated timeline for completion of enrollment and other matters relating to 
the  Company’s  ongoing  clinical  study  programs  such  as  the  LDOS003  study  combining  L-DOS47  with  Vinorelbine/Cisplatin 
(“VIN/CIS”)  for  advanced  stage  lung  cancer  patients  and  the  recently  approved  Investigational  New  Drug  (“IND”)  Phase  Ib/II 
combination study combination with doxorubicin for previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer patients by U.S Food and Drug 
Administration  (“FDA”);  (vi)  seeking  strategic  partner  support  and  therapeutic  market  opportunities;  (vii)  the  Company’s 
advancement in the area of cell based therapy via its subsidiary Helix Immuno-Oncology S.A. (“HIO”) (vii) future expenditures, 
insufficiency of the Company’s current cash resources and the need for financing and the Company’s possible response for such 
matters;  (ix)  future  financing  requirements,  the  seeking  of  additional  funding  (including  the  possible  receipt  of  grants)  and 
anticipated future operating losses; (x) changes in  the application of accounting standards and interpretations; and (xi) industry 
performance, competition (including potential developments relating to immunotherapies and the Company’s possible response 
to such developments), prospects, and general prevailing business and economic conditions.  Forward-looking information can 
further  be  identified  by  the  use  of  forward-looking  terminology  such  as  “expects”,  “plans”,  “designed  to”,  “potential”,  “believe”, 
“intended”,  “continues”,  “opportunities”,  “anticipated”,  “2019”,  “2020”,  “2021”,  “2022”,  “next”,  “ongoing”,  “seek”,  “objective”, 
“estimate”, “future”, or the negative thereof or any other variations thereon or comparable terminology referring to future events or 
results, or that events or conditions “will”, “may”, “could”, “would”, or “should” occur or be achieved, or comparable terminology 
referring to future events or results. 

Forward-looking information includes statements about the future and are inherently uncertain and are necessarily based upon a 
number of estimates and assumptions that are also uncertain.  Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in 
such forward-looking information are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not 
be placed on such statements.  Forward-looking information, including financial outlooks, are intended to provide information about 
management’s  current  plans  and  expectations  regarding  future  operations,  including  without  limitation,  future  financing 
requirements, and may not be appropriate for other purposes.  The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those 
anticipated  in  the forward-looking  information contained in  this  MD&A  as  a  result  of  numerous  known  and  unknown  risks  and 
uncertainties, including, but not limited to: 

 

the Company’s need for additional capital which may not be available in a timely manner or at all (whether from additional 
issuances of the Company’s securities, grant applications or otherwise) and which, if not obtained, will have a material 
adverse impact on the Company and its ability to continue as a going concern; 
the risk that the Company may have to suspend or terminate one or more of its clinical trials for lack of funding, as the 
Company does not have sufficient funds to complete them and will need to raise additional funding, which is not assured; 
  uncertainty as to whether the Company’s drug product candidate(s), especially L-DOS47, will be successfully developed 

 

and marketed; 

  developments  in  immunotherapies  may  result  in  significant  changes  in  the  treatment  of  cancer  and  may  result  in  a 
reduction,  which  may  be  significant,  in  the  potential  patient  population  and/or  treatment  protocols  available  to 
chemotherapies and other treatments currently in development, such as the Company’s primary drug product L-DOS47; 

1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

the possibility of dilution to current shareholders from future equity financings; 
the impact of the ongoing volatility in the economic environment which has negatively affected the availability and terms 
of debt and equity financings and may have a negative effect on the Company’s ability to raise further financing and its 
research and development initiatives; 
risk relating to the difficulty in enrolling patients in clinical trials which may result in delays or cancellation of clinical trials; 
intellectual property risks, including the possibility that patent applications may not result in issued patents, that issued 
patents  may  be  circumvented  or  challenged  and  ultimately  struck  down,  that  any  expiry  of  an  issued  patent,  may 
negatively impact the further development or commercialization of the underlying technology, and that the Company may 
not be able to protect its trade secrets or other confidential proprietary information; 
research and development risks, including without limitation, the fact that the Company’s drug product candidate(s) are 
complex compounds and the Company faces difficult challenges in connection with the manufacture of clinical batches, 
and  the  risk  of  obtaining  negative  findings  or  factors  that  may  become  apparent  during  the  course  of  research  or 
development, any of which may result in the delay or discontinuation of the research or development projects;  
  partnership/strategic alliance risks and the need to secure new strategic relationships, which are both not assured; 
 

the  Company’s  dependence  on  third  parties,  including  without  limitation,  contract  research  organizations,  contract 
manufacturing organizations, clinical trial consultants, collaborative research consultants, regulatory affairs advisors, and 
others, whose performance and interdependence can critically affect the Company’s performance and the achievement 
of its milestones;  
the Company’s dependence on assurances from third parties regarding licensing of proprietary technology owned by 
others, including the Company’s dependence on its license of the L-DOS47 antibody;  
the need for future clinical trials, the occurrence and success of which cannot be assured, and the fact that results seen 
in earlier clinical trials may not be repeated in later trials;  

 

 

  manufacturing risks, the need to manufacture to regulatory standards, uncertainty whether the manufacturing process 
for the Company’s drug candidates can be further scaled-up successfully or at all and the risk that clinical batches of the 
Company’s drug candidate may not be able to be produced in a timely manner or at all, which would have a negative 
effect on the timing and/or occurrence of planned clinical trials and the potential commercialization of the drug candidates; 
the possibility that ongoing drug product stability assay tests may fail, resulting in stoppage and delay of clinical study 
activity until such time that approved drug product is available and approved for use; 

 

  uncertainty  as  to  the  size  and  existence  of  a  market  opportunity  for,  and market  acceptance  of  the  Company’s  drug 
product candidate(s) including as a result of possible changes in the market for the Company’s drug candidates resulting 
from development in immunotherapies or other future cancer treatments; 

  uncertainty as to the availability of raw materials that the Company utilizes to manufacture its products, and in particular, 
Good Manufacturing Practice (“GMP”) grade materials, on acceptable terms or at all, and that the Company may not be 
able to timely obtain alternative suppliers upon commercially viable terms or at all, which could have a material adverse 
effect on the further development and commercialization of any or all of the Company’s drug product candidate(s);  
the risk that either the Polish National Centre for Research and Development (“PNCRD”) or the Company will terminate 
the grant funding agreement &/or that the PNCRD will not extend any extensions to the already set milestones for reasons 
that may result in the PNCRD requesting from the Company that any received financial support be paid in full within 
fourteen days of the day notice is served, with interest, as per the agreement; 

 

  product liability and insurance risks;  
 
 
 
  uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to maintain product liability insurance required by third parties and the risk of the 

the risk of lawsuits and other legal proceedings against the Company; 
the effect of competition, especially from the new immunotherapy treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (“NSCLC”);  
the risk of unknown side effects arising from the development, manufacture or use of the Company’s products;  

 

corresponding agreement being terminated; 
the risk of misconduct on the part of employees and consultants, including non-compliance with regulatory standards 
and requirements; 
the need to attract and retain key personnel and reliance on key personnel;  
that the Company has no sales, marketing and distribution experience;  

 
 
  government regulation, including drug price regulation, and the need for regulatory approvals for both the development 

 

 

 

and profitable commercialization of products, which are not assured;  
risks associated with the fact that the FDA and any other regulatory agency that the Company has consulted are not 
bound by their scientific advice, nor are any approvals given by one regulatory body binding on another;   
rapid technological change and competition from pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and universities, 
which may make the Company’s technology or products obsolete or uncompetitive;  
risks associated with claims, or potential claims, of infringement of third-party intellectual property and other proprietary 
rights;  

2 
 
 
 
 

the risk of unanticipated expenses;  
the impact on the Company’s finances resulting from shifts in foreign exchange rates, credit risk and interest rate risk, 
risks relating to changes in the Company’s tax rates; 
risk relating to a failure to maintain an effective system of internal controls; 
risks relating to the requirements of remaining a public company; 

and other risk factors that are discussed above and elsewhere in this MD&A or identified in the Company’s other public filings 
under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com (together the “Helix Risk Factors”), any of which could cause actual 
results to vary materially from current results or the Company’s anticipated future results.  Certain material factors, estimates or 
assumptions have been applied in making forward-looking information in this MD&A, including, but not limited to, the safety and 
efficacy of the Company’s drug product candidate(s); the Company’s cost and timing in connection with the various clinical studies 
the Company is currently conducting or plans to conduct; that additional and sufficient financing will be obtained in a timely manner 
or  at  all  to  allow  the  Company  to  continue  operations;  the  timely  provision  of  services  and  supplies  or  other  performance  of 
contracts by third parties; future costs; the absence of any material changes in business strategy or plans, the timely receipt of 
required  regulatory  approvals,  strategic  partner  support;  and  that  the  Helix  Risk  Factors  will  not  cause  the  Company’s  actual 
results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking information. 

For all of the reasons set forth above, which do not represent an exhaustive list of factors that may affect the forward-looking 
information, investors should not place undue reliance on forward looking information.  The forward-looking information is based 
on  the  beliefs,  assumptions,  opinions  and  expectations  of  the  Company’s  management  at  the  time  they  are  made,  and  the 
Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking information should those beliefs, assumptions, opinions 
or expectations, or other circumstances change, except as required by law. 

Data relevant to estimated market sizes in connection with Company’s lead products under development are presented in this 
MD&A.  These data have been obtained from a variety of published resources, including published scientific literature, websites 
and information generally available through publicized means.  The Company attempts to source reference data from multiple 
sources whenever possible for confirmatory purposes.  Although the Company believes the data is reliable, the Company has not 
independently verified the accuracy and completeness of this data. 

OVERVIEW 

Helix is an immuno-oncology company primarily focused in cancer drug development.  The Company is developing products for 
the treatment and prevention of cancer based on its proprietary technologies.  The Company’s product development initiatives are 
focused primarily on technologies that modulate the tumour microenvironment.  

To date, the Company’s proprietary technology platform, DOS47 has yielded two new drug product candidates, L-DOS47 and V-
DOS47.  L-DOS47 is currently under  clinical  study  for  the  treatment  of  non-small cell lung cancer (“NSCLC”) and previously 
treated advanced pancreatic cancer.  L-DOS47  has  completed  extensive  preclinical  testing and manufacturing development, 
following which, regulatory  approvals to conduct a Phase I/II clinical trial In Poland and a Phase I study in the U.S. in the NSCLC 
were obtained.  In August 2019, the Company also received approval to conduct a Phase Ib/II combination study in patients with 
previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer.  V-DOS47 has been licensed  to  the  Company’s  Polish  subsidiary  for  preclinical 
and  clinical  development.  The  V-DOS47  drug  candidate  uses  the Company’s  proprietary  DOS47  technology conjugated to 
anti-VEGFR2 antibody targeting a wide range of cancers. 

The  Company continues  to  actively pursue  additional new antibody-based technologies for cell-based therapies.  In  September 
2016  the  Company  announced  that  it  was  developing  a  novel  Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) therapeutic.  The 
Company  believes CEACAM6 specific CAR  immune  cells  may  have  broad  applications  in  a  number  of  cancer  types and is 
working on two camelid single domain antibodies that target CEACAM6.  In 2018, the Company announced a collaboration with 
ProMab Biotechnology to co-develop CAR-T for hematological cancer.  The Company has since sublicensed its cellular therapy 
IP and license to its subsidiary, HIO, to further develop and commercialize these technologies.   The Company maintains rights 
to the Canadian market, milestones and royalties from other territories.    

The Company currently believes that its growth and future prospects are mainly dependent on the success of its DOS47 drug 
product candidates. 

On December 23, 2016, the Company announced, it signed an exclusive out-license agreement with Xisle Pharma Ventures Trust 
(“Xisle”)  for  the  Company's  late-stage,  Biphasix™  technology  platform, including  the  lead  product  candidate, interferon alpha. 
Under the terms of the agreement, Xisle paid an up-front fee and agreed to pay subsequent milestone payments and royalties as 
Xisle advances the technology.  As part of the agreement, Helix retained marketing rights for Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, 
former Eastern Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and Ukraine. In addition, the Company also 
retained non-exclusive rights for co-promotion in Canada. 

3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Company subsequently assigned the foregoing marketing rights which it retained to HIO, its subsidiary in Poland, pursuant 
to an agreement between the Company and HIO with the agreement being subject to the restrictions and limitations associated 
with the out-license agreement signed between the Company and Xisle.  In addition, HIO will be responsible for commercialization 
with  milestone  and  royalty  payments  to  be  paid  back  to  the  Company  upon  successful  product  development  through  to 
commercialization. 

The  Company  finances  its  research  and  development  programs  primarily  from  the  issuance  of  its  securities.    In  addition,  the 
Company is also looking at alternative sources of additional financing.  On July 21, 2016, the Company announced that its Poland 
subsidiary  had  been  awarded  a  funding  grant  from  the  PNCRD  to  develop  V-DOS47.    There  can  be  no  assurance  that  the 
Company will be successful in qualifying and/or receiving any additional grant money or that it will obtain additional financing or 
that the V-DOS47 program will be successful. 

The Company expects to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future and will require additional financial resources to fund 
the Company’s ongoing research and development activities and overhead costs. 

The  Company  continues  to  not  have  sufficient  cash  reserves  to  meet  anticipated  cash  needs  for  working  capital  and  capital 
expenditures through the next twelve months.  The Company’s cash reserves as at July 31, 2019 of $206,000 are not sufficient 
to see the current research and development initiatives through to completion or properly allocate scarce cash resources efficiently 
and as such, the Company will require additional financing in the very near term.  Securing additional sufficient financing continues 
to be of critical importance to the Company. 

On August 21, 2019, the Company completed a private placement financing for gross proceeds of $7,000,005.  Nevertheless, the 
Company still requires additional funding for it’s ongoing clinical development program and working capital.  Given the possibility 
of not being able to secure sufficient additional financing, whether on a timely basis or not at all, the Company may be required to 
reduce, delay or cancel one or more of its planned research and development initiatives, including clinical trials along with further 
reductions in overhead, any of which could impair the current and future value of the Company. 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 

Background 

The immune system utilizes two strategies in attacking different types of pathogens.  The humoral immune system uses antibodies 
as  its  main  weapon.  Antibodies  are  proteins  that  bind  to  extracellular  foreign  invaders,  such  as  bacteria,  and  lead  to 
their 
destruction.  The  cellular  immune  system  utilizes  specialized  immune  cells, called  T-cells  to  identify  and  bind  to  abnormal 
cells  and  subsequently  destroy  them. 

Cancer  cells  have  adopted  and  developed  several  strategies  for  evading  the  immune  system.  In  some  cases,  proteins  are 
expressed  on  the  surface  of  tumour  cells  that  “turn  off”  attacking  T-cells.  By  using  antibodies  to  block  these  interactions 
(such as anti-PD1), T-cells are reactivated to kill the tumours. Although anti-PD1  and  anti-PDL1  therapies  (checkpoint  inhibitors) 
have improved  outcomes for patients, there are many that do not respond to these treatments.  One possible explanation suggests 
that  the  unique  metabolism  of  cancer  cells  creates  an  acidic  tumour  microenvironment  and  this  acidity  has  the  effect  of 
interfering with T-cell function. The Company believes it has developed a novel system to raise pH at the tumour site, thus breaking 
the physiologic barrier that acts to defend against tumour-killing T-cells. 

Alkalization using Urease 

Urease is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into carbon dioxide and ammonia ((NH2)2CO + H2O  → CO2 + 2NH3).  
The Company has conjugated urease to an antibody that specifically targets  lung cancer cells,  thus  delivering  the  urease directly 
to the site of the tumour. L-DOS47, the Company’s first drug product candidate, has recently completed a Phase I/II  monotherapy 
trial in Poland.  It is currently in a Phase I combination trial with carboplatin and pemetrexed in the United States and a Phase II 
combination trial with vinorelbine and cisplatin in Ukraine and Poland.  By  delivering  urease  to  the  tumour  site,  the  company 
expects the pH of the tumour microenvironment to increase and activity of tumour-killing T-cells  to  be  enhanced.  The Company 
believes the urease  system  can  be  used  with  any  tumour specific  antibody as a  general  method  for  modifying  the tumour 
microenvironment,  and  as  such,  could  be  combined  with  any  of  the  current  checkpoint inhibitor products to improve patient 
outcomes. 

CAR-T Cells 

To date, success  in Adoptive Cell  Transfer  (“ACT”) with  engineered  T-cells  such as Chimeric  Antigen  Receptor T- cells  (“CAR-
T”) has occurred mainly in the area of hematological malignancies. As of the end of 2016, 220 CAR T cell trials were documented 
up studies. Of the current trials, 133 target hematological 
term follow
of which approximately 188 are ongoing including nine long
malignancies and 78 solid tumors (Hartman et. al, EMBO Mol Med (2017) 9: 1183–1197). Most clinical trials have used autologous, 
‐
unselected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (“PBMC”) as the starting material and IL
2 for stimulation resulting in a CAR-T cell 
product consisting of CD4 and CD8 T cells with an activated effector T
cell phenotype. In five trials, more than 85% of treated 
patients reached complete response (“CR”) as best clinical outcome (Hartman et. al, EMBO Mol Med (2017) 9: 1183–1197). 

‐

‐

‐

4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
While CAR-T cell therapy has shown impressive clinical benefit, it is sometimes associated with a variety of toxicities that can be 
threatening. Several death cases have been reported, especially in the last year. These were due to neurotoxicity caused by 
life
CAR trials sponsored by Juno Therapeutics. Whether neurological toxicities are solely restricted to 
cerebral edemas in the CD19
‐
CD19
specific CAR-T cells or generally associated with CAR-T cell therapy remains to be elucidated (Hartman et. al, EMBO Mol 
Med (2017) 9: 1183–1197). 

‐

‐

A direct connection to another frequent side effect, the cytokine
been the most frequently observed adverse drug reaction. On
many targeted tumor antigens are also expressed on normal tissue (Hartman et. al, EMBO Mol Med (2017) 9: 1183–1197). 
‐

release syndrome (“CRS”), also appears likely. CRS has so far 
tumor recognition has become a relevant concern, since 

target, off

‐

‐

On August 30, 2017, the FDA approved Novartis’ Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) for certain pediatric and young adult patients with a 
form of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (“ALL”). Kymriah is a genetically-modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy. Each dose of 
Kymriah is a customized treatment created using an individual patient’s own T-cells.  

Solid tumours have created challenges and as such, it is hypothesized that the failure of CAR-T therapies to date may be the result 
of the acidic tumour microenvironment surrounding the cancer cell that inhibits CAR T-cell activity.  The Company believes it is well 
positioned to use its proprietary urease-antibody  technology to alkalinize the tumour microenvironment and improve the ability of 
CAR-T cells to destroy solid tumours. 

Check Point Inhibitors 

Dr. Robert  J.  Gillies of the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa Florida demonstrated some interesting results when treating  acidic 
tumours  in animal models.  Dr. Gillies demonstrated that in alkalized tumour cells, the activity of antibodies  that target  PD-L1, is 
enhanced.  This  would  indicate  that  tumour  acidosis  may  protect  tumours  from  immune  check-point  inhibitors.  Since  tumour 
acidosis  is  experimentally  shown  to  occur  in  cancers  such  as  breast,  colon,  lung  and  pancreas,  the  Company  believes 
methodologies that can alkalize the tumour microenvironment,  such as the Company’s proprietary DOS47 platform technology, 
may work beneficially with check-point inhibitors. 

DOS47 – A broad anti-cancer therapeutic platform 

DOS47  is  based  upon  a  naturally  occurring  enzyme  isolated  from  the  jack-bean plant called urease that breaks down a natural 
substance found in the body, urea, into metabolites that include ammonia and hydroxyl ions.  By doing so at the site of cancerous 
tissues in the body, the Company believes DOS47 can modify the micro environmental conditions of cancerous cells in a manner that 
leads to apoptosis. 

DOS47 stimulates an increase in the pH of the microenvironment surrounding the cancerous cells, effectively reversing the acidic 
extra-cellular conditions  that are  believed to act to defend the  tumour.  This acidic environment can also reduce or  negate  the 
effectiveness  of  some  commonly  used  anti-neoplastic  agents.  The  local production of ammonia at the site of cancerous tissues 
is thought to readily diffuse into the cancer cells to exert a potent cytotoxic effect by interfering with their critical metabolic functions. 
Enzymatic action of urease at the site of cancerous cells is potentially repetitive and sustainable due to the plentiful supply of urea. 

The Company is pursuing the development of DOS47 as  an  adjunct  therapy  in  combination  with  certain  chemotherapeutics, 
immunotherapies  and/or radiation regimens, with a view to maximizing the DOS47 commercial potential. 

DOS47 candidates are produced by conjugating urease with a targeting antibody or antibody fragment that can specifically direct 
the urease to the surface of a cancer cell.  Once docked to the cell, the urease produces ammonia enzymatically through the 
conversion  of  urea  found  throughout  the  body.    These  conjugates  of  antibodies  to  urease  are  called  DOS47  candidates.    By 
selecting antibodies that are selective to different tumour cell surface receptors, the Company believes that DOS47 candidates 
can be used in several types of solid tumours. 

In  fiscal  2015,  the  Company  entered  into  a  collaborative  research  agreement  with  Affilogic  to  assess  proprietary  anti-tumour 
targeting agents in combination with DOS47.  The agreement calls for a feasibility study using a targeting agent in conjugation 
with DOS47.  Continuing development of these new conjugates is subject to a successful feasibility study, execution of a formal 
development and licensing agreement, and the availability sufficient financial resources. 

The  Company  continues  to  reach  out  to  third  parties  in  order  to  identify  and  test  additional  tumour-targeting  antibodies  for 
conjugation with DOS47.  In the event that antibody candidates worthy of further development are identified, the Company will 
need to discuss development and licensing arrangements, which may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at 
all. 

L-DOS47 

L-DOS47 is the Company’s first targeted therapeutic immune-conjugate under development based on the DOS47 technology. 

5 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
L-DOS47  is  an  antibody  protein  conjugate  where  the  urease  component  enzymatically  converts  naturally  occurring  urea  to 
ammonia.  The L-DOS47 drug molecule includes a highly specialized camelid-derived single domain antibody, designed to identify 
a unique CEACAM6 antigenic site associated with NSCLC cells.  By delivering the conjugate in a targeted manner, the Company 
believes L-DOS47 stimulates an increase in the pH of the microenvironment surrounding the NSCLC cells, reversing the acidic 
extra-cellular conditions that are shown to be favourable for cancer cell survival. 

In 2005, the Company entered into a worldwide exclusive license with the National Research Council of Canada (“NRC”), through 
which it  obtained  the  rights  to  combine  this  highly  specialized  camelid-derived  single  domain  antibody  with  Helix’s  DOS47 
technology.  As a result, the Company has certain royalty and milestone payment obligations pursuant to the license agreement.  
The license agreement with the NRC has been filed under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.  The NRC filed 
patent applications in respect of the antibody in Canada, the United States and other countries.  On March 2, 2011, the NRC was 
issued a U.S. patent in respect of the antibody. 

In addition to being a key for cancer progression by promoting invasiveness and metastatic behaviors of cancer cells, the acidic 
tumour microenvironment protects cancer cells from immunotherapy by suppressing the proliferation and cytotoxic activities of 
local immune cells. A series of experiments were performed in which L-DOS47 was used to neutralize acidic tissue culture media 
and the effects on tumor and immune cells in vitro were studied. L-DOS47 treatment reduced PD-L1 expression on the MDA-MB-
231 breast cancer cell line and increased IL-2 production from the Jurkat human T cell line. In addition, L-DOS47 reduced PD-1 
expression on primary human CD8+ T cells, and increased IL-2 and IFNγ production by primary human CD8+ T cells, suggesting 
that L-DOS47 treatment may improve anti-tumor immune responses. 

On July 11 and 18, 2017, the Company announced that it had entered into a collaboration agreement with Moffitt Cancer Center 
to perform basic research studies to further investigate the pharmacodynamics of L-DOS47 and determine the potential benefits 
of combining L-DOS47 with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Under the research plan Moffitt Cancer Center will perform in vitro and 
in vivo research studies to study the pharmacodynamics of L-DOS47 and its effect when combined with check-point blockage 
agents using their unique tumor models. 

V-DOS47 

V-DOS47 is an antibody DOS47 conjugate that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor 2 receptor (VEGFR2).  V-DOS47 is 
the second immuno-oncology drug candidate derived from the Company’s DOS47 technology platform.   

In January 2016, the Company granted a world-wide exclusive license for V-DOS47 to HIO in Poland.  The Company expects that 
day-to-day development activities in respect of V-DOS47 will be coordinated by HIO with coordination and oversight from some 
of the Company’s scientists in Canada. 

As a condition of successfully being awarded grant funding from the PNCRD to advance the V-DOS47, the Company established 
a wet lab facility in Poland.  Based on the grant funding agreement, certain expenditures made commencing on March 1, 2016 
are eligible for reimbursement with the final reimbursement submission to be made no later than September 30, 2021. Given the 
Company’s  forecasted  spend  goes  beyond  September  20,  2021,  the  Company  will  be  asking  the  PNCRD  in  writing  for  an 
extension to the grant funding program which may or may not be granted by the PNCRD.  Total costs associated with the V-
DOS47 development program under the Agreement is PLN19,794,416 ($6,756,000).  Of the total project costs, the PNCRD will 
reimburse  the  Company’s  Polish  subsidiary  approximately  60%  to  80%  of  eligible  expenditures,  depending  on  the  stage  of 
development plus a flat 17% for overhead costs, on the total government funded eligible portion of PLN12,506,956 ($4,269,000).  
The Company’s subsidiary is required to spend PLN4,437,460 ($1,515,000) towards the project plus an additional PLN2,850,000 
($973,000) for manufacturing and clinical trial documentation costs, all of which, are not eligible for subsidies from the PNCRD.   
Subsidized amounts may be drawn in advance or on a reimbursement basis, with varying criteria and timelines for justification of 
claims  being  made  by  the  Company’s  subsidiary.    Of  the  $5,266,000  in  total  future  commitments  towards  this  program,  the 
Company  is  projecting  that  a  total  of  approximately  $2,543,000  will  be  reimbursed  by  the  PNCRD.    The  Agreement  may  be 
terminated by either party upon one month’s written notice with reasons for the termination clearly indicated in writing.  In certain 
cases of termination, the Subsidiary may be obligated to return the received financial support in full within fourteen days of the 
day notice is served, with interest. As at July 31, 2019, the Company has received subsidies from the PNCRD of approximately 
$1,289,000.   

The Company had previously developed four V-DOS47 research candidates and conducted in vitro feasibility studies to establish 
the potential clinical applications for these molecules.  HIO is expected to leverage this know-how to develop a V-DOS47 clinical 
drug  product  candidate.    The  Company  will  assist  HIO  by  sharing  its  extensive  knowledge  in  GMP  manufacturing,  preclinical 
research and clinical experiences.  HIO will collaborate with several Polish institutes through the grant to complete the development 
of the first v-DOS47 clinical drug product candidate.  The development of the clinical drug product candidate for Phase I testing is 
expected to take two to three years.  The actual duration of the development process will depend on successful completion of 
preclinical research favorable for clinical testing and establishment of cGMP manufacturing processes. 

As announced by the Company in August of 2017, a peer-review of V-DOS47 was published in the "Frontiers in Immunology” 
journal. V-DOS47 is Helix’s second DOS47 development candidate following L-DOS47, which is currently in clinical testing for the 
treatment of triple negative breast cancer.  The article, entitled "Development and Characterization of a Camelid Single Domain 

6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Antibody–Urease Conjugate That Targets Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2", describes the design and construction 
of V-DOS47 for breast cancer and other potential indications. 

CAR-T for solid tumours and hematological malignancies 

CEACAM6 specific CARs 

Expression of CEACAM6 protein has been reported in a variety of normal human tissues including granulocytes. However, its 
expression is elevated in many types of solid tumours such as breast, pancreatic, ovarian, lung and colon.  CEACAM6 is envisaged 
as  a  biomarker  and  potential  therapy  target  for  pancreatic  ductal  adenocarcinoma  and  pancreatic  intraepithelial  neoplasia 
(Duxbury et al., 2004a, 2004c, 2004d).  Recently CEACAM6 is suggested to be check point molecule in multiple myeloma. 

The Company believes CEACAM6 specific CAR immune cells may have broad applications in a number of cancer types.  The 
Company is working on two camelid single domain antibodies that target CEACAM6. 

2A3 is a camelid single domain antibody isolated from a whole cancer cell immunized llama library.  The antibody binds specifically 
to the CEACAM6 antigen with high affinity and inhibits the proliferation of CEACAM6-expressing cancer cells in vitro.  The efficacy 
of CEACAM6-CAR-T cells in xenograft model was examined in vivo.  The results strongly support that CEACAM6-CAR-T cells 
can  be  used  as  an  effective  immunotherapy  agent  against  CEACAM6-expressing  cancers,  and  that  camelid  single  domain 
antibodies can be easily adopted for CAR-T type therapies. 

The Company continues to collaborate with ProMab Technologies Inc. (“ProMab”) on CAR-T. Most recently ProMab published a 
paper describing research and validation work on the antibody that the we are co-developing for a CAR-T application against 
multiple myeloma. Data described in the paper included in vitro work and proof-of-concept CAR-T animal studies. 

Vascular epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) CARs 

Most  solid  tumours  and  some  hematologic  malignancies  are  characterized  by  an  angiogenic  phenotype  that  is  an  absolute 
requirement for tumour survival, progression, and metastasis. Therapeutic approaches targeting molecules involved in tumour 
angiogenesis can inhibit tumour growth. Proliferating endothelial cells in the vessels within solid tumours aberrantly express high 
levels of angiogenic growth factors, receptors, and adhesion molecules that are absent or barely detectable in established blood 
vessels,  which  are  normally  quiescent.  Among  these,  VEGF  and  its  receptors  appear  to  be  the  dominant  regulators  of 
angiogenesis responsible for the vascularization of normal and neoplastic tissues. Overexpression of VEGF and its receptors is 
associated  with  tumour  angiogenesis,  survival,  invasion,  metastasis,  recurrence,  and  prognosis  in  human  cancers.  VEGF 
stimulates angiogenesis mainly through VEGFR-2 (also known as Flk1 in mice and KDR in humans), a tyrosine kinase receptor 
that is overexpressed in tumour endothelial cells and on some tumour cells. Pharmacologic approaches to inhibit VEGF, using 
monoclonal antibodies or small molecules, are of value in cancer treatment, though the cytostatic rather than cytotoxic nature of 
these  interventions  and  the  redundancy  of  angiogenic  pathways  have  limited  the  curative  potential  of  these  treatments.  The 
Company believes VEGFR2 specific CAR immune cells may have broad applications in a number of cancer types.  Helix is working 
on two camelid single domain antibodies that target VEGFR2. 

The Company is also leveraging its know-how in manipulating the tumour microenvironment, and its expertise in developing unique 
single domain antibody therapeutics to develop CAR-T novel cell-based treatments. Helix intends to develop CARs for ACT for 
solid and hematological malignancies.  The Company has selected CEACAM6 and VEGFR2 specific CARs for solid tumour.  For 
hematological malignancies the Company has selected CD19, CD22 and BCMA as potential targets. 

On March 2018, The Company has entered a collaboration agreement with ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc. (“ProMab”) to develop 
novel  antibody  and  chimeric  antigen  receptor  T-cell  therapy  (“CAR-T”)  that  targets  BCMA  to  treat  multiple  myeloma.    In  this 
collaboration, the Company retains commercial rights for this CAR-T in Canada and Europe.   

The Company has had discussions with five Polish hospitals with plans to establish centers of excellence, the European Center for 
Cancer Immunotherapy (“ECCI”), that will participate in the development of proprietary immune therapies. seeking investment in 
the establishment of the ECCI in Poland once a business/strategic plan has been finalized and approved by the Company’s Board 
of Directors. 

Clinical study initiatives 

Regulatory approvals have been granted to the Company to conduct three LDOS-47 clinical studies for the treatment of NSCLC, 
a Phase I combination study (LDOS001) in the U.S., a Phase I monotherapy study in Poland and a Phase II combination study in 
Poland, Ukraine and Hungary.  In addition, the Company recently received regulatory approval for an L-DOS47 Phase Ib/II study 
(LDOS006) in the U.S. for a new pancreatic cancer indication. 

7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Phase I clinical study (“LDOS001”) 

On April 22, 2014, the Company announced an IND approval by the FDA to commence a study for an L-DOS47 Phase I, open 
label, dose escalation study in combination with standard doublet therapy of pemetrexed/carboplatin in patients with Stage IV 
recurrent  or  metastatic  non-squamous  NSCLC.    The  Company  has  initiated  three  U.S.  sites:  Dr.  Sarina  Piha-Paul  at  the  MD 
Anderson Cancer Center, Dr. Chandra Belani at Penn State University and the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, and Dr. Afshin 
Dowlati at University Hospitals Case Medical Center. 

On November 30, 2016 the Company announced that after reviewing safety data from the Phase I/II study of L-DOS47 in non-
squamous non-small cell lung cancer (LDOS002), the FDA had accepted an accelerated escalation scheme for L-DOS47 dosing 
in the U.S. Phase I study (LDOS001) up to 12µg/kg in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin. 

The Company provided an update to the LDOS001 study at the Biotech Showcase meeting on January 10, 2017 in San Francisco. 
Highlights of the presentation included the following: 

 No dose limiting toxicities reported at doses up to 0.78µg/kg;
 Partial responses were reported in three (3) of the first six (6) patients dosed;
 Best tumour response reported was a 44% reduction in the sum of target lesions measured; and
 Three  (3)  patients  continued  L-DOS47  monotherapy  following  induction  therapy  of  L-DOS47  in  combination  with

pemetrexed/carboplatin.

On May 26, 2017, the Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI) announced closure of the site due to limited enrollment activity.  The 
site has subsequently been closed and no longer actively recruiting patients. 

On  June  29,  2017,  the  MD  Anderson  Electronic  Protocol  Accrual  Auditing  Committee  (ePAAC)  met  to  review  the  LDOS001 
protocol due to slow patient recruitment. The committee decided to keep the protocol open for an additional six months at which 
time, another review will be conducted. 

On July 25, 2017 the Company announced the opening of patient screening in the third dosing cohort. After a review of safety 
data, the Safety Review Committee (“SRC”) recommended that Helix begin enrollment of patients into the third dosing cohort of 
study LDOS001. Patients enrolled in the third dosing cohort will receive 1.50 µg/kg in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin. 

On September 27, 2017 the Company announced that the FDA had approved an amendment to their U.S. Phase I study, protocol 
LDOS001, accelerating the dose escalation phase of the study. In order to maximize the number of patients receiving a potentially 
active dose of L-DOS47, the study implemented an accelerated dose design up to 6µg/kg followed by a standard 3+3 design for 
the final two dosing cohorts, 9 and 12 µg/kg respectively. 

On May 29, 2018 the Company announced the opening of patient screening in the fourth dosing cohort. After a review of safety 
data, the SRC recommended that Helix begin enrollment into the fourth dosing cohort. Patients enrolled in this cohort will receive 
LDOS47 at a dose level of 3.0 µg/kg in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin. 

On  July  25,  2018  the  Company  announced  the  completion  of  safety  review  for  the  fourth  dosing  cohort  and  following  SRC 
recommendations, will open patient screening in the fifth dosing cohort. Patients enrolled in this cohort will receive L-DOS47 at a 
dose level of 6.0 µg/kg in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin. 

On September 13, 2018 the Company announced the opening of patient screening in the sixth cohort, following SRC review of 
safety data from cohort five. Patients enrolled in the sixth of seven dose escalation cohorts will receive L-DOS47 at a dose level 
of 9.0 µg/kg in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin.  

On July 1, 2019, patient recruitment was closed with the final cohort enrolling only two patients rather than the expected three 
patients due to slow enrolment. A total of fourteen (14) patients have been dosed across 6 dose levels:  0.59 µg/kg, 0.78 µg/kg, 
1.5 µg/kg, 3.0 µg/kg, 6.0 µg/kg and 9.0 µg/kg.  Of fourteen patients assessed for tumour response, six (6) patients have had a 
confirmed  partial  response  (as  defined  by  RECIST  v1.1) 
in  combination  with 
pemetrexed/carboplatin, remaining progression-free ranging from 5.9 to 12.4 months. One additional patient had stable disease 
and remained progression-free for 13.3 months. 

treatment  of  L-DOS47 

following 

With the recent FDA approval of pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) as first line treatment for NSCLC with PD-L1>1%, either as first line 
or in combination with carboplatin/pemetrexed, there is an urgent need for data to demonstrate safety of LDOS47 in combination 
with  accepted  standard  chemotherapies,  and  also  in  combination  with  immunotherapies  that  are  being  offered  with  growing 
frequency. 

The Company expect to have a final clinical study report no later than the first calendar quarter of 2020. 

8European Phase I/II clinical study in Poland (“LDOS002”) 

On July 25, 2011, Helix announced that the Company had received approval from the Central Register of Clinical Trials at the 
Polish Ministry of Health to perform a European Phase I/II clinical study with L-DOS47 and, on May 14, 2012, announced that 
clinical site initiation and patient recruitment activities had commenced for its European Phase I/II clinical study of L-DOS47.  On 
October 23, 2012, the Company announced that its first patient had been enrolled and the first dose had been administered in 
this study. 

The  study  was  conducted  at  five  Polish  centers  under  the  direction  of  Dr.  Dariusz  Kowalski  at  The  Maria  Sklodowska-Curie 
Memorial  Cancer  Centre  &  Institute  of  Oncology  as  the  overall  coordinating  investigator,  together  with  four  other  principal 
investigators:  Prof.  Cezary  Szczylik,  MD,  PhD  at  the  Military  Medical  Institute,  Prof.  Elzbieta  Wiatr,  MD,  PhD  at  the  National 
Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, Dr. Aleksandra Szczensa, MD, PhD at the Mazovian Center of Pulmonary 
Diseases and Tuberculosis in Otwock and Prof. Rodryg Ramlau, MD, PhD at Med. Polonia Hospital Poznan. 

The  study  was  conducted  in  patients  with  inoperable,  locally  advanced,  recurrent  or  metastatic,  non-squamous  stage  IIIb/IV 
NSCLC.  The study recruited patients eligible for inclusion into escalating doses of L-DOS47 given as a monotherapy.  The study 
utilized an open-label design, allowing for periodic status updates through its course.  The study was intended to demonstrate 
valuable safety and proof-of-concept efficacy data for L-DOS47. 

In the Phase I portion of the study, patients received weekly doses of L-DOS47, administered as an intravenous infusion over 14 
days, followed by seven days' rest (one treatment cycle is three weeks), in order to determine the MTD of L-DOS47. The Phase 
II portion of the study evaluated the preliminary efficacy of L-DOS47. 

In the Phase I component of the study, a total of 55 male and female patients, at least 18 years of age, with histologically confirmed 
non-squamous NSCLC were dosed at 16 L-DOS47 dose levels.  Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology 
Group  performance  status  of 0  –  2  at  the screening visit  for  this study and  have  at  least  one  site of  measurable  disease  per 
RECIST v1.1. 

The Phase II component enrolled the same patient population as the Phase I at an L-DOS47 dose of 13.55µg/kg. Patients in the 
study were dosed twice weekly over 14 days (Days 1, 4, 8, 11) followed by a 7-day rest. A total of 21 patients were dosed in the 
first stage of the Phase II component of the study.  

To date, the Company completed four interim data reviews in connection with the LDOS002 Phase I study and one final review of 
Phase II study. 

On October 15, 2013, the Company announced the completion of an interim data review of the first four cohorts for this study. 
The  release  stated  that  L-DOS47  was  well  tolerated  for  all  patients  treated  within  all  cohorts.    None  of  the  treatment  related 
adverse events reported to date met the definition of a dose-limiting toxicity.  Adverse events reported as of that date were those 
normally expected for the population under study. 

A review of available pharmacokinetic (“PK”) and immunogenicity data showed that these data so far, were consistent with trends 
seen within pre-clinical animal studies of L-DOS47.  Results from these reviews, together with safety data provided guidance on 
the treatment schedule and dosing for the Phase II portion of the study. 

Based  on  Radiologic  Evaluations,  patients  assigned  a  status  of  “Progressive  Disease”  following  any  such  assessment  were 
withdrawn  from  the  study.    At  least  one  patient  in  each  of  the  four  cohorts  dosed  had  a  radiological  assessment  of  “Stable 
Response”.  Duration of treatment increased with each dose escalation up to Cohort 4.  One patient in Cohort 3 was dosed for 6 
cycles without disease progression.  None of the patients treated to date had a partial or complete response as defined by RECIST 
v1.1 definition. 

On September 30, 2014, the Company announced the completion of a further interim data review for the first eight cohorts for the 
LDOS002  study.    The  review  included  all  available  data,  including  patient  demographics,  safety  assessments,  PK  data, 
immunogenicity and radiological tumour assessments.  The following observations were made: 

 Adverse events reported were expected for investigational product and population under study;
 No Dose Limiting Toxicities (“DLTs”) have been reported;
 Stable disease observed in radiological assessments of 12 of 24 (50%) of patients treated; and
 Two patients completed six cycles of treatment each.

On  September  8,  2015, the  Company  announced  the  presentation  and update of  the ongoing  clinical  study  LDOS002  for  the 
Company’s  drug  candidate  L-DOS47  during  the  16th  World  Conference  on  Lung  Cancer  held  in  Denver  Colorado.    The 
presentation included the following data: 

 40 patients were enrolled in the first twelve dosing cohorts;
 L-DOS47 was well tolerated at the dose levels up to 4.33 µg/kg;

9 No DLTs were reported for Cohorts 1-12;
 One (1) DLT was reported for Cohort 13;
 adverse events reported to date were expected for the population under study;
 21 of the 40 patients had an overall response of stable disease based on radiological assessment after completing two

cycles of L-DOS47;

 11 of these 21 patients continued with a response of stable disease based on radiological assessment after completing

four cycles of L-DOS47;

 one (1) patient in cohort 9 was dosed for 10 cycles (approximately seven (7) months) without disease progression;
 the study is currently enrolling patients in the thirteen-dosing cohort (5.76 µg/kg).

On December 6, 2016, the Company presented the following LDOS002 Phase I data for the Company’s drug candidate L-
DOS47 during the 17th World Conference on Lung Cancer held in Vienna, Austria: 

 90 patients were consented and screened for participation in the study;
 55 patients were administered at least one dose of L-DOS47 at dose levels ranging from 0.12 to 13.55µg/kg;
 21 patients completed four treatment cycles and 16 patients were administered additional L-DOS47 cycles;
 Comparatively, patients in cohorts 13 to 16 (5.76 to 13.55µg/kg) were exposed to more L-DOS47 for a longer duration

without a significant change to the safety profile of L-DOS47 compared to the other dosing cohorts;
 44, or 80% of the patients in the safety population had at least one treatment emergent adverse events;
 L-DOS47 did not elicit a dose-dependent release of cytokines at doses up to 13.55µg/kg
 The  MTD  of  L-DOS47  was  not  reached  in  the  Phase  I  component  of  study  LDOS002  at  doses  administered  up  to

13.55µg/kg;

 L-DOS47 was well tolerated at all dose levels up to 13.55µg/kg.
 A dose response trend was observed when comparing the percentage of patients who were progression free at 16 weeks

across dose ranges;

 A similar trend was observed when comparing the percentage of patient who had an overall tumour response of Stable

Disease (as defined in RECIST v1.1) and had a reduction in the sum of target lesions;

 11 of 14 or 79% of patients in the highest dosing cohorts (5.76 to 13.55µg/kg) had an overall tumour response of Stable

Disease following the administration of two cycles of L-DOS47;

 Seven (7) of 14 or 50% of patients in the same dosing cohorts had an overall tumour response of Stable Disease and a

reduction in the sum of target lesions and 57% of patients were progression free for greater than 16 weeks.

On  March  8,  2016,  the  Company announced  the  following approved changes  by  the  central  ethics committee overseeing  the 
Phase I/II study in Poland as it relates to the Phase II component of the study, which the Company intends to initiate:  

 There will be no further escalations of L-DOS47 past cohort 16. If there are no further dose limiting toxicities, the cohort

16 dose, 13.55 µg/kg, will be the dose administered to patients in the Phase II dose.

 The  safety  profile  supports  a  more  frequent  administration  of  L-DOS47.  After  reviewing  safety,  pharmacokinetic  and
immunogenicity data, L-DOS47 will be dosed twice weekly over 14 days (Days 1, 4, 8, 11) followed by a 7-day rest in the
Phase II study.

 The number of patients in the Phase II study will be increased to 45 patients. Based on Simon’s optimal two-stage design, 
17  evaluable  patients  will  be  enrolled  in  the  first  stage  of  the  Phase II  component  of  the  study.  If  there  is/are
≥ 1 response(s) out of these initial 17 evaluable patients, 22 additional evaluable patients will need to be enrolled. To
obtain 39 patients evaluable for response, enrolment of approximately 45 patients are needed.

On April 21, 2016, the Company announced the approval by the Trial Steering Committee to initiate the Phase II component of 
the LDOS002 study. On April 28, 2016, the Company announced the enrolment of the first patient in the Phase II component of 
the LDOS002 study. The first Phase II patient was dosed on May 10, 2016 and had now completed their first L-DOS47 cycle. 

Although  the  Phase  II  intensified  L-DOS47  regimen  was  well  tolerated  by  patients  enrolled  in  the  first  stage  of  the  study,  an 
improvement in potential benefit to patients compared to the Phase I regimen (L-DOS47 dosed once weekly over 14 days (Days 
1,  8)  followed  by  a  7-day  rest)  was  not  observed.  The  potential  complications  associated  with  more  frequent  intravenous 
administrations in LDOS002 did not support the potential benefit to patients, past cycle four. As a result, the LDOS002 protocol 
was amended to limit the number of dosing cycles to a maximum of 6 cycles.  

Following the review of clinical data collected to date, L-DOS47 continues to be well tolerated. The data also suggests that L-
DOS47 may provide a clinical benefit for certain patients. After completion of enrolment for the first stage of the Phase II component 
of study LDOS002 (n=21), a Trial Steering Committee Meeting was held on December 19, 2017 to review safety and efficacy data 
to determine next steps. A recommendation was made by the committee to stop further enrolment into the second stage of the 
Phase II component of the study due to lack of efficacy as defined by protocol (≤ 1objective response). 

All analyses have been completed and a draft clinical study report is currently under review and expected to be finalized by the 
end of calendar 2019. 

10Phase II clinical study (“LDOS003”) 

A potential secondary yet unproven aspect of L-DOS47 action is the observation that an acidic pH microenvironment (< pH 6.8) 
may  limit  the  effectiveness  of  weakly  basic  cytotoxic  drugs  employed  in  treatment  of  lung  and  other  solid  tumours.  An  acidic 
microenvironment is associated with protonation of these agents and decreased uptake and alkalinisation can result in enhanced 
agent uptake and cytotoxicity. Furthermore, extracellular acidity may also inhibit the active transport of some drugs.  This raises 
the possible application of L-DOS47 to combination cancer therapies with agents which have little or no overlapping toxicities. 

This study is designed to determine the possible chemo-enhancing properties of L-DOS47. The possibility of combining L-DOS47 
with  a  weakly  basic  agent  like  vinorelbine  may  improve  therapeutic  outcomes  for  cancer  patients.  The  vinorelbine/cisplatin 
combination is used as a first-line treatment for lung adenocarcinoma. 

The  Company  has  initiated  a  Phase II,  open-label,  randomized  study  in  male  and  female  patients  aged  ≥ 18  years  old  with 
metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The staging will be conducted according to Tumour Node Metastases (TNM), 8th Edition.  In 
Part 1 of the study (Dose Escalation), patients will receive eight (8) doses of L-DOS47 over four (4) cycles. On Day 1 and Day 8 
of each cycle, L-DOS47 (administered as an intravenous (“IV”) infusion) will be administered 24 hours before vinorelbine/cisplatin. 
Once the maximum tolerated dose of L-DOS47 as an adjunct to vinorelbine/cisplatin is determined, patients in Part 2 of the study 
(Randomized  Treatment)  will  be  randomly  assigned  to  receive  L-DOS47  in  combination  with  vinorelbine/cisplatin  or 
vinorelbine/cisplatin alone. Six (6) sites have been identified in Poland and the Ukraine to participate in Part 1. Initial Competent 
Authority approval was received for Ukraine in February 2018, and a further amendment approval was received in March 2018. 
Ethics  approvals  for  three  Ukraine  sites  are  already  in  receipt  since  end  of  February  2018.  Competent  Authority  and  Ethics 
Committee approvals for three sites in Poland were received in April 2018. Site selection activities to add a third country, Hungary, 
to the randomized treatment part of the study were completed in March 2018. 

The Company had placed the LDOS003 study on hold since April 2018 due to the Company’s limited financial resources at the 
time.  Activities  resumed in  November  2018,  and  Competent  Authorities  approval for  Hungary  was  received  on  November  29, 
2018. First sites were initiated in Ukraine and Poland on December 13, 2018 and January 24, 2019, respectively. The first subject 
entered into screening for the Part I dose escalation phase of the study was in Ukraine on February 19, 2019, and the first study 
drug dose was subsequently initiated on March 6, 2019. Safety data review for the first cohort (6 µg/kg) was completed by the 
Trial Steering Committee on April 15, 2019, with a recommendation to escalate to the next cohort dose level (9 µg/kg). The Trial 
Steering  Committee  completed  safety  data  review  for  the  second  cohort  of  patients  (9  µg/kg)  on  July  18,  2019,  with  a 
recommendation to escalate to the next cohort dose level (12 µg/kg). To date, two (2) patients have been dosed at 12 µg/kg on 
October 8 and 16, 2019, respectively. 

The Company has determined that it will not be moving forward with Part 2 of the study unless certain clinical objectives are met 
in Part 1 of the study and sufficient capital is obtained, or the Company enters into a co-development partnership with a third party. 

In the event that both conditions above are met, the Company does not have sufficient supply of L-DOS47 to complete Part 2 of 
the study and as a result, would have to manufacture additional drug product. Manufacturing of any new drug product could take 
up to one year and would be subject to successful quality assurance release and availability. 

Vinorebine/cisplatin chemotherapy combination in the US has become infrequent due to the rapidly evolving treatment landscape 
and the growing prominence of immunotherapies such as Keytruda®. The Company had commenced this study based on the use 
of vinorebine/cisplatin chemotherapy combinations in Eastern Europe and Asian markets. 

U.S. Phase I clinical study (“LDOS006”) 

Following a June 4, 2018 Scientific and Strategic Advisory Board (“SSAB”), in collaboration with Dr. Von Hoff at Translational 
Genomics Research Institute in Scottsdale, Arizona, the Company began early development of a Phase I/II study, L-DOS47 given 
in combination with doxorubicin, for previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer accounts for approximately 
3% of all cancers in U.S. for which there are currently few treatment options. An IND was filed on July 8, 2019 and the subsequent 
approval of the FDA was received on August 6, 2019. The first site and Principal Investigator, Dr. Erkut Borazanci at HonorHealth 
in Scottsdale, Arizona, has been identified. Study start-up activities are currently well under way with a site initiation anticipated in 
November 2019. 

The Company does not have sufficient supply of L-DOS47 to complete the study, and as a result, has recently contracted with a 
third-party manufacturer to produce new drug product that could take up to one year and would be subject to successful quality 
assurance release and availability. The Company’s current supply of L-DOS47 continues to be subjected to stability assays every 
six months.  The next planned stability study for the current batch of drug product is scheduled for November 2019.  Provided the 
stability assay passes, the current available batch of drug product should be available for use up to April of 2020 at which point in 
time another stability assay will be scheduled.  In the event that any of the stability assays (current batch or new production batch) 
does not pass, the Company’s clinical studies and any planned research and development programs would likely face delays and 
possibly be cancelled which could impair the current and future value of the business. 

11Given the Company’s limited current cash resources and the possibility of not being able to obtain additional financing on a timely 
basis, the Company may be required to reduce, delay or cancel one or more of its planned research and development programs, 
including clinical studies, along with further reductions in overhead, any of which could impair the current and future value of the 
business. 

Commercialization 

The  Company’s  DOS47  commercialization  objective  is  to  eventually  enter  into  a  strategic  partnering  alliance  with  a  large 
pharmaceutical company, on an individual or multiple drug candidate basis, such as L-DOS47 or any potential new DOS47 drug 
product  candidate.  The  Company  has  retained  Deloitte  Corporate  Finance  as  its  strategic  advisor  to  explore  partnering  and 
licensing Opportunities in February.  The intention of Company is to enter a structured process that will include preparing the 
Company  to  have  discussions  with  potential  partners,  engaging  in  dialogue  with  a  targeted  group  of  qualified  partners  and 
licensees, and entering negotiations on a prospective partnership, alliance or licensing transaction. In the meantime, the Company 
will  continue  to  gather  as  much  value-adding  clinical  data/findings,  which  demonstrate  the  safety  and  efficacy  of  L-DOS47  in 
patients or any other new potential DOS47 drug candidate so as to maximize value for shareholders when entering into a strategic 
partnering alliance. 

Market and Competition 

Based on information published in “Key Statistics for Lung Cancer” by the American Cancer Society (www.cancer.org), lung cancer 
accounts for about one out of four of all cancer deaths and is by far the leading cause of cancer death among men and women in 
the U.S. It is estimated that in 2017 there will be over 222,500 new lung cancer cases. 

If detected early, surgical removal of the cancerous tissue is currently a patient’s best option.  However, in the vast majority of 
cases, the cancer is not typically identified until it has advanced to a level at which surgical intervention is no longer an option.  In 
the cases of inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC and with no known targetable mutations, treatment 
strategies  consist  of  one  or  more  of  today’s  leading  chemotherapeutic  drug  regimens  for  lung  cancer  (e.g.  platinum  therapy 
together  with  certain  leading  chemotherapeutic  drugs).    Typically,  these  regimens  relieve  symptoms  and,  at  best,  delay 
progression of the disease. 

Disease progression, even with targeted therapies, is highly likely to occur, and there are no clear guidelines and/or indications 
once such therapies fail.  Maintenance therapy following the induction of first-line therapy is also a treatment strategy gaining 
support. 

Immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors that target Programmed Death 1 (“PD-1”) or its ligands, Programmed 
Death Ligand 1 or 2 (“PD-L1” and “PD-L2”, respectively) are showing significant clinical successes in NSCLC. On March 4, 2015 
the  FDA  approved  Nivolumab,  the  generic  name  for  the  trade  drug  named  Opdivo®,  which  targets  PD-1  for  the  treatment  of 
metastatic squamous NSCLC with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.  On October 2, 2015, the FDA granted 
accelerated  approval for  Pembrolizumab,  the  generic  name  for  the  trade  drug  named  Keytruda®,  which  targets  PD-1 to  treat 
patients with advanced metastatic NSCLC whose disease has progressed after other treatments and with tumours that express 
PD-L1.  Anti-PD-L1 drugs such as MPDL3280A from Roche are also advancing rapidly through late stage clinical trials. 

In 2015, three randomized Phase III trials found the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab to have superior 
efficacy and less toxicity compared with second-line docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. For the first time, agents 
blocking a single pathway have shown significant benefit across multiple tumour types, with US Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA) approval in NSCLC, melanoma, and bladder and renal cell carcinoma. Now more than 1,000 immune checkpoint clinical 
trials  are  underway.  Many  possible  treatment  avenues  are  being  explored  with  immune  checkpoint  inhibitors,  including 
combinations with radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and other checkpoint inhibitors. Some studies are also investigating 
checkpoint inhibitors as front-line therapy. 

As of March 2017, the FDA had approved five checkpoint inhibitor drugs: ipilimumab (Yervoy®), pembrolizumab (Keytruda®), 
nivolumab (Opdivo®), atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) and avelumab (Bavencio®). 

On May 10, 2017, the FDA granted accelerated approval to pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®, Merck and Co., Inc.) in combination 
with pemetrexed and carboplatin for the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic non-squamous non-small cell 
lung cancer (NSCLC). Approval was based on a cohort (G1) of patients enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, multi-cohort study 
(KEYNOTE-021).  As  a  result  of  these  developments  in  the  treatment  of  NSCLC,  the  Company  is  currently  reassessing  its  L-
DOS47 clinical program given that: (a) its target therapeutic indication, being inoperable, locally-advanced, recurrent or metastatic 
NSCLC, may be a good candidate to combine with the emerging best-in-class immunotherapies; and (b) leading therapeutics for 
such  oncology  applications  have  commonly  been  high  revenue  generators  for  the  pharmaceutical  sector.  The  FDA  recently 
approval pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) as first line treatment for NSCLC with PD-L1>1%, either as first line or in combination with 
carboplatin/pemetrexed. Consequently, there is an urgent need for data to demonstrate safety of LDOS47 in combination with 
accepted standard chemotherapies, and also in combination with immunotherapies that are being offered with growing frequency. 

12Technological competition from pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and university researchers is intense and 
is  expected  to  continue  to  be  very  intense.  Many  competitors  and  potential  competitors  have  substantially  greater  product 
development  capabilities  and  financial,  scientific,  marketing  and  human  resources  than  the  Company,  providing  them  with  a 
competitive advantage over the Company. 

The BiphasixTM Topical Formulation System 

The  Biphasix™  Topical  Formulation  System  is  a  platform  technology  which  the  Company  acquired  and  further  developed  for 
microencapsulating  therapeutic  compounds  in  multilayered,  lipid-based  microvesicles.    These  microvesicles  have  complex 
structures that include a variety of compartments into which drug molecules can be integrated.  The principal application of the 
technology is in the preparation of topical dosage forms for the dermal (into the skin) or mucosal (into the mucosal tissues) delivery 
of large molecular weight drug compounds. 

Topical Interferon Alpha-2b 

Due to a lack of funding, a decision was made by the Company in fiscal 2012 to downsize and eventually close the Saskatoon 
laboratory which supported the Topical Interferon Alpha-2b drug development program. 

On December 23, 2016, the Company announced, it signed an exclusive out-license agreement with Xisle for the Company's late-
stage, Biphasix™ technology platform, including the lead product candidate, interferon alpha. Xisle is responsible for the continued 
clinical  development  and  subsequent  commercialization  of  the  product  for  the  treatment  of  HPV-induced,  low-grade,  cervical 
intraepithelial  lesions.  Under  the  terms  of  the  agreement,  Xisle  paid  an  up-front  fee  of  $125,000  USD  and  agreed  to  pay 
subsequent milestone payments as they advance the technology to registration and market approvals and royalties.  As part of 
the agreement, Helix retains marketing rights for Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, former Eastern Germany, Hungary, Moldova, 
Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and Ukraine. In addition, the Company also retains non-exclusive rights for co-promotion in 
Canada. 

The  Company subsequently  assigned  the marketing  rights which it  retained  over  to  HIO in  Poland pursuant  to  an  agreement 
between the Company and HIO with the agreement being subject to the restrictions and limitations associated with the out-license 
agreement signed between the Company and Xisle.  In addition, HIO will be responsible for commercialization with milestone and 
royalty payments to be paid back to the Company upon successful product development through to commercialization. 

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss, over the last eight quarters, has ranged from a high of $2,564,000 in fiscal Q2 2018 to a 
low of $1,379,000 in fiscal Q1 of 2019 with fluctuations mainly dependant on the availability of cash reserves and the resulting 
impact on research and development activities and operating, general and administration expenses. 

From a research and development spending perspective, the Company’s L-DOS47 clinical studies in NSCLC have been in the 
later  stages  of  patient  enrollment  while  the  Company  prepared  for  a  new  IND  clinical  study  in  previously  treated  advanced 
pancreatic cancer patients, which was just approved by the FDA in August of 2019 and therefore reflects the overall lower research 
and developments spend.  Operating and general expenditures after the Company’s cost reduction initiatives in late fiscal 2017 
and early 2018 have now leveled off on a year-to-year basis with some slight fluctuations quarterly. For example, in fiscal Q4 
2019, the Company granted stock options resulting in stock-based compensation expenses and paid bonuses to the Company’s 
CEO and CFO resulting in higher fiscal Q4 2019 operating, general and administrative expenses. 

The  Company  closed  several  private  placements  in  fiscal  2019  for  gross  proceeds  of  approximately  $6,522,000  (2018  - 
$8,518,000). 

The following table depicts selected annual data from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended July 31: 

Research and development expense 
Operating, general and administration expense 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss 
Deficit, end of year 

Basic and diluted loss per common share 
Weighted average number of common shares 

Cash 
Working capital / (deficiency) 
Total assets 

2019 
5,006,000 
2,486,000 

$ 
$ 

2018 
6,084,000 
2,462,000 

$ 
$ 

$ 
(7,526,000) 
$  171,531,000 

$ 
(8,625,000) 
$  164,005,000 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

0.07 
106,645,801 

206,000 
(3,534,000) 
940,000 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

0.09 
99,928,708 

366,000 
(1,901,000) 
1,147,000 

$ 
$ 

2017 
6,524,000 
3,738,000 
(10,059,000) 
$ 
$  155,380,000 

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

0.11 
91,797,627 

897,000 
(504,000) 
2,187,000 

13 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table depicts selected quarterly data from continuing operations for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2019: 

Research and development 
Operating, general and administration 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss  
Basic and diluted loss per common share 
Weighted average number of common shares 

Cash 
Working Capital / (deficiency) 

Q4 
$  1,311,000 
881,000 
$ 

$  (2,168,000) 
(0.02) 
$ 
106,645,801 

$ 
206,000 
$  (3,534,000) 

Q3 
$  1,351,000 
699,000 
$ 

$  (2,071,000) 
(0.02) 
$ 
106,939,164 

$ 
938,000 
$  (2,203,000) 

Q2 
$  1,330,000 
533,000 
$ 

$  (1,908,000) 
(0.02) 
$ 
105,086,590 

$ 
306,000 
$  (1,998,000) 

Q1 
$  1,014,000 
373,000 
$ 

$  (1,379,000) 
(0.01) 
$ 
103,646,025 

$ 
871,000 
$  (1,997,000) 

The following table depicts selected quarterly data from continuing operations for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018: 

Research and development 
Operating, general and administration 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss  
Basic and diluted loss per common share 
Weighted average number of common shares 

Cash 
Working Capital / (deficiency) 

RESULTS FROM OPERATIONS 

Q4 
990,000 
606,000 

$ 
$ 

$  (1,611,000) 
(0.02) 
$ 
99,928,708 

366,000 
$ 
$  (1,901,000) 

Q3 
$  1,435,000 
686,000 
$ 

$  (2,147,000) 
(0.02) 
$ 
99,280,711 

770,000 
$ 
$  (1,915,000) 

Q2 
$  1,895,000 
644,000 
$ 

$  (2,564,000) 
(0.03) 
$ 
98,461,495 

$  1,641,000 
(263,000) 
$ 

Q1 
$  1,764,000 
526,000 
$ 

$  (2,303,000) 
(0.02) 
$ 
96,860,911 

$  3,175,000 
$  1,674,000 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss from continuing operations 

The Company recorded a net loss and total comprehensive loss of $7,526,000 ($0.07 loss per common share) and $8,625,000 
($0.09 loss per common share) for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018, respectively. 

Research & development 

Research and development costs for fiscal 2019 and 2018 totalled $5,006,000 and $6,084,000, respectively. 

The following table outlines research and development costs expensed and investment tax credits for the Company’s significant 
research and development projects for the fiscal years ended July 31:  

L-DOS47 
V-DOS47 
CAR-T 
Corporate research and development expenses 
Trademark and patent related expenses 
Stock-based compensation expense 
Depreciation expense 
Research and development investment tax credit 
Polish government grant subsidy (V-DOS47) 

2019 
$  3,530,000 
478,000 
333,000 
528,000 
435,000 
198,000 
109,000 
(126,000) 
(479,000) 

2018 
$ 4,893,000 
457,000 
318,000 
432,000 
440,000 
10,000 
141,000 
(132,000) 
(475,000) 

$  5,006,000 

$ 6,084,000 

L-DOS47 research and development expenses for fiscal 2019 totalled $3,530,000 (2018 - $4,893,000).  L-DOS47 research and 
development expenditures relate primarily to the Company’s LDOS001 Phase I clinical study in the U.S., the LDOS002 European 
Phase I/II clinical study  in  Poland,  the  LDOS003  Phase  II  clinical  study in  Poland  and  the  Ukraine  and  the  Company’s  newly 
approved Phase Ib/II clinical study in the U.S.. 

The Company’s overall reduction in research and development spend when compared to the previous fiscal year is the result of 
the Company’s NSCLC studies (LDOS001 and LDOS002) all being in the late stage of development within their respective clinical 
phases while at the same time, the Company starts ramping up activity of its newly approved IND clinical study for previously 
treated advanced pancreatic cancer (LDOS006). 

The supporting L-DOS47 expenditures include costs associated with the Company’s research laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta 
which includes employee wages and benefits, fixed overhead costs such as rent, light, heat, water and variable costs such as 
laboratory  consumables.    Also  included  are  costs  associated  with  the  manufacture  of  L-DOS47  drug  substance/product  and 
related assays from third party suppliers and costs associated with running and managing the L-DOS47 clinical trials in the various 

14 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
geographic jurisdiction.  These include wages and benefits of employees involved in overseeing third-party vendors who monitor 
the trials on behalf of the Company in addition to all patient clinical study costs incurred at the various clinics where patients are 
being dosed. 

V-DOS47 research and development expenses for fiscal 2019 totalled $478,000 (2018 - $457,000).  Research and development 
expenditures in the program remained flat when compared to fiscal 2018.  The Company’s Polish subsidiary entered into a grant 
funding  agreement  with  the  PNCRD  for  research  and  development  expenditures  associated  with  V-DOS47.    The  V-DOS47 
expenditures  include  costs  associated  with  the  Company’s  research  laboratory  in  Warsaw,  Poland  which  includes  employee 
wages and benefits, fixed overhead costs such as rent, light, heat, water and variable costs such as laboratory consumables.  In 
fiscal 2019, the Company’s Polish subsidiary received grant funding of $479,000 (2018 - $475,000).  The grant funds received by 
the Company’s Polish subsidiary are offset against the eligible research and development expenditures associated with the V-
DOS47 program.  Subsidized amounts may be drawn in advance or on a reimbursement basis, with varying criteria and timelines 
for justification of claims being made by the Company’s Polish subsidiary.  The Agreement may be terminated by either party upon 
one  month’s  written  notice  clearly  spelling  out  the  reasons  for  which  the  Agreement  is  being  terminated.    In  certain  cases  of 
termination, the Subsidiary may be obligated to return the received financial support in full within fourteen days of the day notice 
is served, with interest. As at July 31, 2019, the Company has received subsidies from the PNCRD of approximately $1,289,000.  

CAR-T research and development expenses for fiscal 2019 totalled $333,000 (2018 - $318,000).  The  Company  commenced 
development of novel CAR-T therapeutics and new antibody-based technologies for cell-based therapies. The Company’s CAR-T 
expenditures relate primarily to collaborative research activities with ProMab Biotechnologies Inc. 

Corporate research and development expenses for fiscal 2019 totalled $528,000 (2018 - $432,000).  The increase in corporate 
research and development expenditures mainly represents a bonus payout to the Chief Executive Officer. 

Trademark and patent related expenses for fiscal 2019 totalled $435,000 (2018 - $440,000).  The Company continues to ensure 
it adequately protects its intellectual property. 

Operating, general and administration 

Operating, general and administration expenses for fiscal 2019 totalled $2,486,000 (2018 - $2,462,000). Operating, general and 
administration expenses remained relatively flat.  The Increase in wages and benefits and stock-based compensation were offset 
by a reduction in lower director fees and other general and administrative expenditures.  The increase in wages & benefits and 
stock-based compensation is the result of a bonus payout to the CFO and stock options granted to administrative employees and 
non-management directors. The reduction in director fees reflects a reduction in committee and board meetings held as well as a 
reduction  in  the  number  of  directors  on  the  board  of  the  company.    Limited  working  capital  throughout  the  year  resulted  in 
reductions in other general and administrative spending activity. 

The following table outlines operating, general and administration costs expensed for the following periods: 

Wages & benefits 
Director fees 
Third-party advisors 
Other general and administrative 
Stock-based compensation expense 
Depreciation expense 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES 

$ 

2019 
759,000 
162,000 
1,068,000 
316,000 
164,000 
17,000 
$  2,486,000 

$ 

2018 
665,000 
214,000 
1,089,000 
468,000 
– 
26,000 
$  2,462,000 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  IFRS  requires  management  to  make  judgments,  estimates  and 
assumptions  that  affect the  application  of  accounting  policies and  the  reported  amounts of  assets  and  liabilities,  revenue and 
expenses and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and the determination of the Company’s ability to continue 
as  a  going  concern.  Actual  results  could  differ  materially  from  these  estimates  and  assumptions.    The  Company  reviews  its 
estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis.  Revisions are recognized in the period in which the estimates are 
revised and may impact future periods. 

The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the 
Company’s financial statements have been set out in Note 1 of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the 
fiscal year ended July 31, 2019. 

15 
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

The significant accounting policies used in preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements are described in Note 2 of 
the Company’s audited consolidated financial statement for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2019, except for those related accounting 
policies and methods of computation related to any new accounting standards and pronouncements. 

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED 

New  accounting  standards  and  pronouncements  issued  but  not  yet  effective  up  to  the  date  of  issuance  of  the  Company's 
consolidated financial statements are listed below.  This listing includes standards and interpretations issued, which the Company 
reasonably expects to be applicable at a future date.  The Company intends to adopt those standards when they become effective. 
Certain pronouncements have been issued by the IASB or International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee.  Many of 
these updates are not applicable or are inconsequential to the Company and have been excluded from the discussion below: 

New accounting standards 
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 
Effective  August  1,  2018,  the  Company  adopted  IFRS  9  Financial  Instruments  (IFRS  9)  which  replaced  IAS  39,  Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39). IFRS 9 includes revised guidance on the classification and measurement 
of financial assets and liabilities; new guidance for measuring impairment on financial assets; and new hedge accounting guidance. 

On adoption of IFRS 9, the Company has classified the financial assets and financial liabilities held at August 1, 2018, based on 
the  new  classification  requirements  and  the  characteristics  of  each  financial  instrument  as  at  the  transition  date.  The  new 
classification did not require a restatement of prior periods. 

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers 
The Company currently has no revenue stream as it is still in the research and development stage.  As it evolves out of that stage, 
the Company will have a closer look at how this standard will impact how it recognizes revenue. 

Future accounting standards 
New  accounting  standards  and  pronouncements  issued  but  not  yet  effective  up  to  the  date  of  issuance  of  the  Company's 
consolidated financial statements are listed below.  This listing includes standards and interpretations issued, which the Company 
reasonably expects to be applicable at a future date.  The Company intends to adopt those standards when they become effective. 

Certain pronouncements have been issued by the IASB or International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee.  Many of 
these updates are not applicable or are inconsequential to the Company and have been excluded from the discussion below: 

IFRS 16, Leases 
In  January  2016,  the  IASB  has  issued  IFRS  16  Leases  (“IFRS  16”),  its  new  leases  standard  that  requires  lessees  to 
recognize  assets  and  liabilities  for  most  leases  on  their  balance  sheets.  Lessees  applying  IFRS  16  will  have  a  single 
accounting model for all leases, with certain exemptions. Lessor accounting is substantially unchanged. The new standard  will 
be  effective  from January 1,  2019  with  limited  early application permitted.  The  Company  is  evaluating  the  impact  of  the  new 
standard on its results of operations, financial position and disclosures. 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 

Since inception, the Company has mainly relied on financing its operations from public and private sales of equity.  The Company 
does not have any credit facilities and is therefore not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements or covenants.  The 
Company manages its liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecasts and actual cash flow from operations and anticipated 
investing and financing activities. 

The  Company  reported  a consolidated net  loss and total comprehensive loss of $7,526,000 for fiscal 2019 (2018 - $8,625,000).  
As at July 31, 2019 the Company had a working capital deficiency of $3,534,000 (2018 - $1,901,000), shareholders’ deficiency of 
$3,281,000 (2018 - $1,527,000) and a deficit of $171,531,000 (2018 - $164,005,000). 

In order for the Company to advance its various currently planned preclinical and clinical research and development activities and 
pay for its overhead costs, the Company will need to raise approximately $20,000,000 to $25,000,000.  The Company is projecting 
average monthly fixed overhead costs of approximately $425,000 per month This amount does not include the costs related to 
any of the Company’s third-party activities such as clinical studies, collaborative research activities and contract manufacturing.  

The  Company  currently  has  several  clinical  studies  (see  Clinical  Study  Initiatives  above  for  details)  in  various  stages  of 
development. 

Due to slow enrollment, the Company stopped LDOS001 enrollment in July 2019 with the final cohort enrolling two patients rather 
than the planned three patients.  The Company expect to have a final clinical study report no later than the first calendar quarter 

16of 2020 and is forecasting a cost of approximately $627,000 to complete.  The Company’s LDOS002 clinical study is complete 
and the Company is currently awaiting the finalized clinical reports.  The Company previously forecasted LDOS003 as a large 
randomized study.  The Company has concluded that it would not move forward with the randomized portion of the study unless 
certain clinical objectives are met in the does escalation phase and sufficient capital is obtained, or the Company enters into a co-
development partnership with a third party.  As a result, the Company is now forecasting the non-randomized portion of the study 
to cost approximately $1,028,000 and to be completed by first calendar quarter of 2020. 

The Company recently received IND approval by the FDA to conduct a Phase Ib/II study (LDOS006) in the U.S., L-DOS47 in 
combination  with  doxorubicin,  for  previously  treated  advanced  pancreatic  cancer.  The  Company  forecasting  a  cost  of 
approximately $6,400,000 in order to fully complete the study, which is projected to be some time by the end of calendar 2021.  

In support of the clinical study programs, the Company will need to manufacture drug product.  The Company originally determine 
that it would likely need an entire new manufacturing batch but has since determine that a current batch could be repurposed at 
a  cost  of  approximately  $1,640,000  which  includes  all  assay  development  and  stability  studies.    The  manufactured  batch  is 
expected to be available, at the latest, by the fourth quarter of calendar 2020. 

The Company is currently forecasting to spend approximately $90,000 in collaborative research initiatives with the Moffit Cancer 
Centre and is assessing additional collaborations. 

As for the Company’s V-DOS47 preclinical program in Poland, the Company is committed to spending approximately $5,266,000 
of  which  a  portion  of  these  costs,  approximately  $2,543,000  are  to  be  reimbursed  from  PNCRD  government  subsidies.    The 
Company  previously  disclosed  that  it  was  looking  to  dispose  of  its  ownership  position  in  its  Polish  subsidiary  while  retaining 
licensing agreement for future milestones and royalty payments.  More recently, as part of a financing on August 21, 2019 for 
gross proceeds of $7,000,005, the Company disposed 25% of it’s investment in its Polish subsidiary.  As part of the Company’s 
plan to divest of its Polish subsidiary, the Company is looking at its Polish subsidiary to raise capital, to fund the CAR-T program. 

The Company raised gross proceeds of approximately $6,522,000 in fiscal 2019.  The Company’s cash reserves of $206,000 as 
at July 31, 2019 in addition to the subsequent private placements the Company closed on August 21, 2019 for gross proceeds of 
approximately $7,000,005 are insufficient to meet anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures through the 
next twelve months, and nor are they sufficient to see planned research and development initiatives through to completion.  Though 
the funds raised have assisted the Company in dealing with its working capital deficiency, additional funds are required to advance 
the Company’s clinical and preclinical programs and deal with working capital requirements  To the extent that the Company does 
not believe it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current obligations, management considers securing additional funds, primarily 
through the issuance of equity securities of the Company, to be critical for its development needs. 

The Company’s long-term liquidity depends on its ability to raise funds from various sources, which depends substantially on the 
success of its ongoing research and development programs, economic conditions and the state of the biotech industry. 
Accessing  the  capital  markets  can  be  particularly  challenging  for  companies  that  operate  in  the  biotechnology  industry.    The 
Company has predominately raised funds utilizing the services of ACM Alpha Consulting Management.  While the Company has 
been able to raise equity financing in recent years, there can be no assurance that additional funding by way of equity financing 
will continue to be available.  Any additional equity financing, if secured, would result in dilution to the existing shareholders and 
such  dilution  may  be  significant.    The  Company  may  also  seek  additional  funding  from  or  through  other  sources,  including 
technology  licensing,  co-development  collaborations,  mergers  and  acquisitions,  joint  ventures,  and  other  strategic  alliances, 
which,  if  obtained,  may  reduce  the  Company’s  interest  in  its  projects  or  products  or  result  in  significant  dilution  to  existing 
shareholders.  The Company may also seek additional funding from government grants.  The Company is also assessing the 
possibility of a Nasdaq listing in order to reach the U.S. capital markets for funding.  There can be no assurance, however, that 
any alternative sources of funding will be available.  The failure of the Company to obtain additional financing on a timely basis 
may result in the Company reducing, delaying or cancelling one or more of its planned research, development and/or marketing 
programs, including clinical trials, further reducing overhead, or monetizing non-core assets, any of which could impair the current 
and future value of the business or cause the Company to consider ceasing operations and undergoing liquidation. 

Given the Company’s conclusion about the insufficiency of its cash reserves, significant doubt may be cast about the Company’s 
ability to continue operating as a going concern.  The continuation of the Company as a going concern for the foreseeable future 
depends mainly on raising sufficient capital, and in the interim, reducing, where possible, operating expenses (including making 
changes to the Company’s research and development plans), including the delay of one or more of the Company’s research and 
development programs, further reducing overhead and the possible disposition of assets. 

The Company had a total number of 111,225,501 common shares issued and outstanding as at July 31, 2019 (July 31, 2018 – 
102,809,579 common shares). 

17RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

The following table summarizes key management personnel compensation for the fiscal years ended: 

Compensation 
Stock-based compensation 

$ 

   2019 
767,000 
291,000 

2018 
$  695,000 
– 

$  1,058,000 

$  695,000 

An amount of $225,000 was advanced to the Company by an officer.  The advance is interest bearing at 4% per annum and is 
repayable, on demand, no later than August 30, 2019.  The principle amount along with interest, was repaid, as per terms.  The 
advance is included in accruals as at July 31, 2019. 

The following table summarizes non-management directors’ compensation for the fiscal years ended: 

Directors’ fees 
Stock-based compensation 

$ 

2019 
162,000 
24,000 

2018 
$  212,000 
– 

$ 

186,000 

$  212,000 

The following table summarizes the total compensation for both ACMest and ACMag for the fiscal years ended: 

Finder’s fee commissions 
Investor relations consulting fee 

$ 

2019 
940,000 
571,000 

2018 
$ 1,065,000 
  516,000 

$  1,511,000 

$ 1,581,000 

The  Company  has  agreements  with  both  ACM  Alpha  Consulting  Management  EST  (“ACMest”)  and  ACM  Alpha  Consulting 
Management AG (“ACMag”).  The agreements are both effective July 2, 2018 and can be terminated upon ninety days notice. 
Mr. Kandziora is President of ACMest and acted as Observer on the Board of Directors of the Company up until August 22, 2019 
in  addition  to  also  being  on  the  Supervisory  Board  of  the  Company’s  Polish  subsidiary,  Helix  Immuno-Oncology  S.A.    Mrs. 
Kandziora is President of ACMest and was Corporate Secretary up until August 22, 2019. 

Related party transactions are at arm’s length and recorded at the amount agreed to by the related parties. 

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

Fair value hierarchy 

Financial  instruments  recorded  at  fair  value  on  the  balance  sheet  are  classified  using  a  fair  value  hierarchy  that  reflects  the 
significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.  The fair value hierarchy has the following levels: 

 Level 1 reflects valuation based on quoted prices observed in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 Level 2 reflects valuation techniques based on inputs that are quoted prices of similar instruments in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices used in a
valuation model that are observable for that instrument; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data by correlation or other means; and

 Level 3 reflects valuation techniques with significant unobservable market inputs.

A financial instrument is classified to the lowest level of the hierarchy for which a significant input has been considered in measuring 
fair value.  The financial instrument in the Company’s financial statements, measured at fair value, is cash. 

Fair value 

The fair value of financial instruments as at July 31, 2019 and July 31, 2018 approximates their carrying value because of the 
near-term maturity of these instruments. 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

Patents  and  other  proprietary  rights  are  very  valuable  to  the  Company,  even  though  the  patent  positions  of  biotechnology 
companies may be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual issues.  The Company has no assurance that any of its patent 
applications will result in the issuance of any patents.  Even issued patents may not provide the Company with a competitive 
advantage against competitors with similar technologies, or who have designed around the Company’s patents.  Furthermore, the 

18 
 
 
Company’s patents may be struck down if challenged.  Intellectual property laws do not protect intellectual property to the same 
extent from one country to another. 

Because of the substantial length of time and expense associated with developing new products, the pharmaceutical, medical 
device, and biotechnology industries place considerable importance on obtaining patent protection for new technologies, products, 
and processes.  The Company’s policy is to file patent applications to protect inventions, technology, and improvements that are 
important to the development of our business and with respect to the application of our products and technologies to the treatment 
of  a  number  of  disease  indications.    The  Company’s  policy also  includes  regular  reviews  related  to  the  development  of  each 
technology and product in light of its intellectual property protection, with the goal of protecting all key research and developments 
by patent. 

The  Company  seeks  intellectual  property  protection  in  various  jurisdictions  around  the  world  and  owns  patents  and  patent 
applications relating to products and technologies in the United States, Canada, Europe and other jurisdictions.  The scope and 
duration  of  our  intellectual property  rights  vary  from  country  to  country  depending  on  the nature and  extent  of  our  intellectual 
property filings, the applicable statutory provisions governing the intellectual property, and the nature and extent of our legal rights. 
The Company will continue to seek intellectual property protection as appropriate and require our employees, consultants, outside 
scientific collaborators, and sponsored researchers to enter into confidentiality agreements with us that contain assignment of 
invention clauses outlining ownership of any intellectual property developed during the course of the individual’s relationship with 
us. 

DOS47, L-DOS47 and V-DOS47 

The Company currently owns two U.S. patents in respect of the DOS47 technology, and also has also licensed patent rights from 
the  NRC  for  the  antibody  component  of  L-DOS47.    With  respect  to  non-U.S.  patents,  the  Company  owns  52  DOS47  related 
patents in other jurisdictions with a number of patent applications in countries around the world.  The Company has recently filed 
a joint patent application in the U.S. with Amorfix to cover the antibody-DOS47 conjugates derived from their collaboration.  A new 
U.S.  patent application  to cover  new  features  of  the  DOS47  technology  was  filed  by  the  Company  during  fiscal 2013.  During 
January 2015, an additional U.S. patent application covering specific L-DOS47 manufacturing and novel features was filed.  During 
fiscal  2017,  a  new  U.S.  patent  application  protecting  the  novel  use  of  L-DOS47  in  restoring  T  cell  function  for  therapeutic 
application was filed. In addition, two US patents covering anti-VEGFR2 antibodies and their use in DOS47 conjugates (V-DOS4) 
were filed. 

Cell Based Therapy 

The company has recently filed a joint patent application with NRC to protect the use of an antibody for use in cell-based therapies.  
In addition, the company has also filed new patent application covering the use of anti-VEGFR2 antibodies in cell-based therapy 
in July 2017.  The Company is currently in discussion with third parties to license additional intellectual properties to strengthen 
the company’s portfolio. 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS 

The Company has no material off-balance sheet arrangements. 

SUBSEQUENT EVENT 

On  August  21,  2019,  the  Company  completed  a  private  placement  financing  of  13,725,500  units  of  the  Company  and  the 
disposition of a 25% stake of its Polish subsidiary for $7,000,005. Each unit comprises one common share and one common share 
purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one common share at an exercise 
price of $0.72 and will have an expiry of five years from the date of issuance. 

TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 

The Company’s commitments are summarized as follows: 

2020 

V-DOS47 co-funded project (1) 
Clinical research organizations (2) 
452,000 
Royalty and in-licensing (3) 
20,000 
Financial & investor relations (4) 
131,000 
Collaborative research organizations (5)  88,000 
Facility leases (6)  
66,000 
Contract manufacturing organizations (7)  17,000 

2023 
$  1,365,000   $ 2,382,000  $ 1,163,000  $  356,000 
– 
– 
20,000 
20,000 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

 – 
20,000 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2021 

2022 

$ 

2024 
–
– 
20,000 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2025 and 
beyond 

$

Total 
– $5,266,000
452,000
–
160,000 
60,000 
131,000
–
88,000
–
66,000
–
17,000
–

$  2,139,000  $  2,402,000  $ 1,183,000  $  376,000     $ 20,000 

$  60,000  $6,180,000 

19(1)  PNCRD V-DOS47 co-funding program.  Subsidized amounts may be drawn in advance or on a reimbursement basis, with 
varying criteria and timelines for justification of claims being made by the Company’s subsidiary.  Of the $5,266,000 in total 
future  commitments  towards  this  program,  the  Company  is  projecting  that  a  total  of  approximately  $2,543,000  will  be 
reimbursed by the PNCRD.  The Agreement may be terminated by either party upon one month’s written notice clearly spelling 
out the reasons for which the Agreement is being terminated.  In certain cases of termination, the Subsidiary may be obligated 
to return the received financial support in full within fourteen days of the day notice is served, with interest. As at July 31, 
2019, the Company has received subsidies from the PNCRD of approximately $1,289,000.   

(2)  The Company has Clinical Research Organization supplier agreements in place for clinical research services related to the 

management of the Company’s clinical stage programs. 

(3)  Represents future minimum royalties. 
(4)  The  Company  amended a  financial  advisory  agreement  effective July  2,  2018  which includes  a  termination  clause  which 

requires a ninety-day written notice (also see RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS section above). 

(5)  The Company has Collaborative Research Organization supplier agreements relating to its L-DOS47 program. 
(6)  The Company is committed to pay $66,000 under three facility lease agreements with lease terms up to 12 months. 
(7)  The Company has Contract Manufacturing Organization supplier agreements related to its L-DOS47 program, all of which 

are inter-dependant with the manufacturing of L-DOS47.  

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

The Company’s main objectives when managing capital are to ensure sufficient liquidity to finance research and development 
activities, clinical trials, ongoing administrative costs, working capital and capital expenditures.  The Company includes cash and 
components of shareholders’ equity, in the definition of capital.  The Company endeavours not to unnecessarily dilute shareholders 
when managing the liquidity of its capital structure. 

Currency risk 

The Company operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risks from various currencies, primarily the Euro and 
U.S. dollar.  Foreign exchange risks arise from the foreign currency translation of the Company’s integrated foreign operation in 
Poland.  In addition, foreign exchange risks arise from purchase transactions, as well as recognized financial assets and liabilities 
denominated in foreign currencies. 

Balances in foreign currencies at July 31: 

Cash 
Accounts receivable 
Accounts payable 
Accruals 
Net foreign currencies 

Euros 
– 
– 
(401,000) 
(25,000) 
(426,000) 

 2019 
US 
Zloty 
Dollars 
 330,000 
– 
–      143,000 
(232,000) 
(107,000)
(134,000) 

–

(563,000) 

(563,000) 

Closing exchange rate 
1.4627 
Impact of 1% change in exchange rate  +/- 6,000 

1.3148 
 +/- 7,000 

      0.3413 
      +/-nil 

 2018 
US 
Dollars 
–
–     

(334,000) 
(63,000) 
(397,000) 

Zloty 
241,000
126,000 
(299,000) 
(69,000)
(1,000) 

Euros 
33,000 
– 

 (412,000)  

–

(379,000) 

1.5239 

+/- 6,000        +/- 5,000   

1.3017        0.3568 
+/-nil 

Any fluctuation in the exchange rates of the foreign currencies listed above could have an impact on the Company’s results from 
operations; however, they would not impair or enhance the ability of the Company to pay its foreign-denominated expenses. 

Credit risk 

Credit risk is the risk of a financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its 
contractual obligation. 

The table below breaks down the various categories that make up the Company’s accounts receivable balances as July 31: 

Government related – HST/VAT 
Research and development investment tax credits 
Other 

$ 

2019 
82,000 
121,000 
87,000 
$  290,000 

$ 

2018 
73,000 
233,000 
9,000 
$  315,000 

20 
 
 
Interest rate risk 

Interest rate risk is the risk that future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in interest rates, which 
are affected by market conditions.  The Company is exposed to interest rate risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates received 
on its cash.  The Company does not have any credit facilities and is therefore not subject to any debt related interest rate risk. 

The Company manages its interest rate risk by maximizing the interest income earned on excess funds while maintaining the 
liquidity necessary to conduct its operations on a day-to-day basis.  Any investment of excess funds is limited to risk-free financial 
instruments.  Fluctuations in the market rates of interest do not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations 
due to the relatively short-term maturity of any investments held by the Company at any given point in time and the low global 
interest rate environment.  The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to interest rate risk. 

Liquidity risk 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations as they come due. 

Since inception, the Company has mainly relied on financing its operations from public and private sales of equity.  The Company 
does not have any credit facilities and is therefore not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements or covenants. 

The Company manages its liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecasts and actual cash flow from operations and anticipated 
investing and financing activities. 

The Company’s cash reserves of $206,000 as at July 31, 2019 are insufficient to meet anticipated cash needs for working capital 
and capital expenditures through the next twelve months, nor are they sufficient to see the current research and development 
initiatives through to completion.  To the extent that the Company does not believe it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current 
obligations, management considers securing additional funds primarily through equity arrangements to be of utmost importance. 

The Company’s long-term liquidity depends on its ability to access the capital markets, which depends substantially on the success 
of the Company’s ongoing research and development programs, as well as economic conditions relating to the state of the capital 
markets  generally.    Accessing  the  capital  markets  is  particularly  challenging  for  companies  that  operate  in  the  biotechnology 
industry. 

OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA 

As at July 31, 2019, the Company had outstanding 111,225,501 common shares; warrants to purchase up to 43,372,897 common 
shares;  and  incentive  stock  options  to  purchase  up  to  4,875,000  common  shares.    As  at  July  31,  2018,  the  Company  had 
outstanding 102,809,579 commons shares; warrants to purchase up to 35,078,975 common shares; and incentive stock options 
to purchase up to 930,000 common shares.   

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING 

Management has designed the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that all relevant 
information  is  gathered,  recorded,  processed,  summarized and  reported  to  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  (“CEO”)  and  the  Chief 
Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the Company so that appropriate decisions can be made within the time periods specified in securities 
legislation regarding public disclosure by the Company in its annual filings, interim filings or other documents or reports required 
to be filed or submitted by it under securities legislation. 

Management has also designed internal controls over financial reporting (“ICFR”) to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance 
with  IFRS.    Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  ICFR  can  provide  only  reasonable  assurance  and  may  not  prevent  or  detect 
misstatements.  Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may 
become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of  compliance  with  policies  or  procedures  may 
deteriorate. 

Material weakness previously disclosed but not yet remediated 

The termination of the Company’s controller in fiscal 2017, whose position to this day has not been filled, resulted in a lack of 
resources and has in turn impacted segregation of duties associated with the financial close and reporting process. 

As at July 31, 2019, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and ICFR 
and have concluded they are not effective due to the above noted area of concern. 

Management has concluded and the board has agreed, that when taking into account the Company’s size and financial resources, 
the Company does not have sufficient scale of resources to warrant the hiring of additional staff to address this concern at this 
time and, accordingly, that there is a material weakness in the design of the Company’s ICFR that has the potential to result in 

21material misstatements in the Company’s financial statements and that this should also be considered a weakness in the design 
and operating effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures.  This material weakness is considered to be a 
common area of deficiency for many smaller listed companies in Canada. 

Although the CEO and CFO are not aware of the above deficiency having actually resulted in a material misstatement of a financial 
statement amount or disclosure, they have determined that, the deficiency could result in business and accounting practices that 
could put both the Company’s reputation and its financial reporting at risk and lead to uncertainty whether control procedures are 
being carried out such that the Company’s ICFR may fail to prevent or detect a material misstatement of a financial statement 
amount or disclosure on a timely basis or fail to disclose material information required to be disclosed under securities legislation 
within the time periods specified in securities legislation.  However, there are several mitigating procedures and other factors which 
reduce the risk of a material misstatement in the financial statements, including substantive review of the financial statements by 
the Company’s audit committee and day-to-day management involvement in operations and reporting.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 

Helix is subject to risks, events and uncertainties, or “risk factors”, associated with being a publicly traded company operating in 
the biotechnology industry, with research and development stage projects in pre-clinical discovery and clinical development and 
with no expectation of revenue or profits in the foreseeable future and, as such, is heavily dependant on raising sufficient capital 
on a timely bases in order to advance the Company’s drug development programs.  As a result of these risk factors, reported 
information  and  forward-looking  information  may  not  necessarily  be  indicative  of  future  operating  results  or  of  future  financial 
position, and actual results may vary from the forward-looking information or reported information.  The Company cannot predict 
all of the risk factors, nor can it assess the impact, if any, of such risk factors on the Company’s business or the extent to which 
any factor, or combination of factors, may cause future results or financial position to differ materially from either those reported 
or those projected in any forward-looking information.  Accordingly, reported financial information and forward-looking information 
should not be relied upon as a prediction of future actual results.  Some of the risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, its 
business, operations and results which could cause actual results to differ materially from those reported or from forward-looking 
information include, either wholly or in part, those described elsewhere in this MD&A, as well as the following: 

The Company does not have any source of operating income and is dependent solely on outside sources of financing 

The  Company’s  operations  consist  of  research  and  development  activities,  which  do  not  generate  any  revenue. 
Accordingly, the Company has no source of revenue, positive operating cash flow or operating earnings to subsidize its 
ongoing research and development and other operating activities and the ability of the Company to continue as a going 
concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to rely on cash on hand, and on outside sources of financing to fund 
its ongoing research and development and other operating activities.  Such sources of financing involve risks, including 
that the Company will not be able to raise such financing on terms satisfactory to the Company or at all, and that any 
additional equity and/or any convertible debt financing, if secured, would result in dilution to existing shareholders, and 
that such dilution may be significant. While the Company has been able to raise equity financing in recent years, there 
can be no assurance that additional funding by way of equity financing will continue to be available.  Any additional equity 
and/or debt financing, if secured, would result in dilution to the existing shareholders and such dilution may be significant. 
The  Company  may  also  seek  additional  funding  from  or  through  other  sources,  including  technology  licensing,  co-
development collaborations, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, and other strategic alliances, which, if obtained, 
may reduce the Company’s interest in its projects or products or result in significant dilution to existing shareholders. 
The Company may also seek additional funding from government grants.  There can be no assurance, however, that any 
alternative sources of funding will be available.  The failure of the Company to obtain additional financing on a timely 
basis may result in the Company reducing, delaying or cancelling one or more of its planned research and development 
programs, including clinical trials, further reducing overhead, or monetizing non-core assets, any of which could impair 
the  current  and  future  value  of  the  business  or  cause  the  Company  to  consider  ceasing  operations  and  undergoing 
liquidation. Given the Company’s conclusion about the insufficiency of its cash reserves, significant doubt may be cast 
about the Company’s ability to continue operating as a going concern.  The continuation of the Company as a going 
concern  for  the  foreseeable  future  depends  mainly  on  raising  sufficient  capital,  and  in  the  interim,  reducing,  where 
possible, operating expenses (including making changes to the Company’s research and development plans), including 
the delay of one or more of the Company’s research and development programs, further reducing overhead and the 
possible disposition of assets. 

The Company has a history of losses and expects to continue to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future 

The Company’s primary focus continues to be on its research and development of drug product candidates.  The research 
and development of drug product candidates require the expenditure of significant amounts of cash over a relatively long-
time period.  The Company expects to continue to incur losses from continuing operations, for the foreseeable future. 
The Company’s cumulative deficit as at July 31, 2019 is $171,531,000.  There can be no assurance that the Company 
will record earnings in the future.   

22The Company requires additional funding 

The Company’s cash reserves will not be sufficient for the Company to fully fund the Company’s ongoing research and 
development  programs,  operating  activities,  working  capital  or  capital  expenditures  for  the  next  twelve  months.    The 
Company has no sources of external liquidity, such as a bank loan or line of credit.  The Company is therefore in need 
of additional equity and/or debt financings in order to fund its ongoing research and development programs and other 
operating expenses for the foreseeable future. 

The failure of the Company to obtain additional financing on a timely basis may result in the Company reducing, delaying 
or  cancelling  one  or  more  of  its  planned  research  and  development,  including  any  clinical  trials,  further  reducing 
overhead, or monetizing non-core assets, any of which could impair the current and future value of the business or cause 
the Company to consider ceasing operations and undergoing liquidation. 

The Company faces risks in connection with competition and technological change; 

The biotechnology  industry  is subject  to  rapid  and  substantial  technological  change.   Technological  competition  from 
pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and university researchers is intense and is expected to continue 
to be intense. 

The rapid advancement of immunotherapies has and likely will continue to significantly change the treatment of cancer 
and may result in a reduction, which may be significant, in the potential patient population and/or treatment protocols 
available to chemotherapies and other treatments currently in development, such as the Company’s primary drug product 
candidate, L-DOS47.  Developments in immunotherapies have resulted in the Company repositioning its L-DOS47 lead 
drug product candidate away from a front-line monotherapy protocol towards second and third-line combination therapies 
with existing chemotherapy drugs and possibly in combination with immunotherapies resulting in additional expenditures 
and delays in previously anticipated development timelines for L-DOS47.  Advancements in technology can impact the 
Company at any time and as such, any further repositioning, would likely result in additional expenses being incurred by 
the Company and in further delays in the anticipated development timeline for L-DOS47, or in the Company determining 
that its L-DOS47 drug product candidate is no longer viable.  The Company is currently heavily dependent on the success 
of its lead drug product candidate L-DOS47 which is the only drug candidate currently in clinical development. 

The Company cell-based therapies initiative may face significant hurdles. The Company’s effort is mainly at research 
proof-of-concept stage. It is possible that the selected targets or choice of antibodies are not optimal. This can delay the 
initiation of formal preclinical and clinical development significantly.  The Company has chosen to develop cell-based 
therapy for solid tumour.  While there are many successful examples of cell-based therapy treatment in hematological 
malignancies, similar success in solid tumour is less certain. 

Many of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources and significantly 
greater  experience  in  conducting  preclinical  testing  and  human  clinical  trials  of  product  candidates,  scaling  up 
manufacturing operations and obtaining regulatory approvals of products. Accordingly, the Company’s varying competitors 
may succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for products more rapidly. The Company’s ability to  compete successfully 
will largely depend on: 

 the  efficacy  and  safety  profile  of  our  product  candidates  relative  to  marketed  products  and  other  product

candidates in development;

 our ability to develop and maintain a competitive position in the product categories and technologies on  which

we focus;

 the time it takes for our product candidates to complete clinical development and receive marketing approval;
 our ability to obtain required regulatory approvals;
 our ability to commercialize any of our product candidates that receive regulatory approval;
 our ability to establish, maintain and protect intellectual property rights related to our product candidates;  and
 acceptance of any of our product candidates that receive regulatory approval by physicians and other  healthcare

providers and payers.

Competitors  have  developed  and  may  develop  technologies  that  could  be  the  basis  for  products  that  challenge  the 
differentiated nature and potential for best-in-class product development programs and discovery research capabilities of 
the  DOS47  platform  technology.  Some  of  those  products  may  have  an  entirely  different  approach  or  means  of 
accomplishing the desired therapeutic effect than our product candidates and may be more effective or less costly than 
our product candidates. The success of our competitors and their products and technologies relative to our technological 
capabilities and competitiveness could have a material adverse effect on the future preclinical studies  a nd clinical trials 
of our product candidates, including our ability to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for the conduct of such clinical 
trials.  This  may  further  negatively impact  our  ability  to  generate  future  product  development  programs  with  improved 
pharmacological properties. 

23With the recent FDA approval of pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) as first line treatment for NSCLC with PD-L1>1%, either 
as first line or in combination with carboplatin/pemetrexed, there is an urgent need for data to demonstrate the safety of 
L-DOS47 in combination with accepted standard chemotherapies, and also in combination with immunotherapies that 
are being offered with growing frequency.  In addition, the rapidly evolving treatment landscape and growing prominence 
of  immunotherapies,  along  with  the  infrequent  use  of  vinorebine/cisplatin  chemotherapy  combination  in  the  U.S.,  the 
potential relevance of data from the Company’s LDOS003 study may be limited. 

If we are not able to compete effectively against our current and future competitors, our business will not grow and our 
financial condition and operations will substantially suffer. 

The Company is conducting early stage research and development initiatives for products under development which 
may not be accepted by the market and may never generate revenue and the Company has limited sales, marketing and 
distribution experience 

The Company is conducting early stage research and development initiatives and is currently in the process of developing 
new products that require further time consuming and costly research and development.  It will be a number of years, if 
ever, before its products in development begin to generate revenues, if at all.  There can be no assurance that any of the 
drug product candidates will ever be successfully developed or commercialized. 

Even with regulatory approval, the Company may not achieve market acceptance, which depends on a number of factors, 
including the establishment and demonstration in the medical community of the clinical utility of the Company’s products, 
and their potential advantage over alternative treatment methods.  There is also the risk that the actual market size or 
opportunity  for  the  Company’s  drug  candidates  is  not  certain.    Failure  to  gain  market  acceptance  of  either  of  the 
Company’s  products  currently  under  development  or  an  incorrect  estimate  in  the  nature  and  size  of  their  respective 
markets could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 

The Company has limited sales, marketing and distribution experience, and there is no assurance that the Company will 
be able to establish adequate sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities or make arrangements with any collaborators, 
strategic partners, licensees, or others to perform such activities, or that such efforts will be successful.  The Company’s 
objective  for its  drug  candidate  products  is  to  enter  into  strategic  alliances  with appropriate  pharmaceutical  partners. 
There can be no assurance that any such strategic alliance will be maintained or achieved, or if achieved, that it will result 
in revenue to the Company. 

The timing of the Company’s internal goals and projected timelines may not be met 

The Company sets internal goals for and makes public statements regarding its expected timing of meeting the objectives 
material to its success, including the commencement, duration and completion of clinical trials and anticipated regulatory 
approvals.  The actual timing of these forward-looking events can vary dramatically due to a number of factors, including, 
without  limitation,  delays  in  scaling-up  of  drug  product  candidates,  delays  or  failures  in  clinical  trials,  additional  data 
requirements from the regulators, the Company failing to obtain required financing, and other risks referred to herein. 
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, it is possible that required regulatory approvals may be delayed or denied, 
including those related to undertaking or continuing clinical trials, manufacturing of drug products, and marketing such 
products. 

The Company has expressed certain estimated timelines for its European Phase I//II clinical trials for L-DOS47 in Poland, 
the U.S. Phase I study.  The timeline for the European Phase I/II trials and any future timelines are contingent on the 
Company having adequate financing to complete the trials and the assumption that the trials will be completed according 
to the current schedules.  A failure to obtain necessary financing or a change in the schedule of the trials (which may 
occur if certain cost-deferral measures are taken, or due to factors beyond the Company’s reasonable control, such as 
scheduling conflicts, the occurrence of serious adverse events, interruption of supplies of study drugs, withdrawals of 
regulatory  approvals,  or  slow  patient  recruitment)  could  delay  their  commencement  or  completion,  or  result  in  their 
suspension or early termination, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 

The  Company  faces  intellectual  property  risks,  including  the  loss  of  patent  protection,  the  potential  termination  of 
licences, the inability to protect proprietary property, and possible claims of infringement against the Company or against 
a third-party from whom the Company licenses intellectual property 

The Company’s success depends, in part, on its ability to secure and protect its intellectual property rights and to operate 
without infringing on the proprietary rights of others or having third parties circumvent the rights owned or licensed by the 
Company.  However, the Company cannot predict the enforceability of its patents or its ability to maintain trade secrets 
that  may  not  be  protected  by  patents.    Patent  risks  include  the  fact  that  patent  applications  may  not  result  in  issued 
patents, issued patents may be circumvented, challenged, invalidated or insufficiently broad to protect the Company’s 
products  and  technologies;  blocking  patents  by  third  parties  could  prevent  the  Company  from  using  its  patented 
technology; it may be difficult to enforce patent rights, particularly in countries that do not have adequate legal enforcement 
mechanisms, and enforcing such rights may divert management attention and may cause the Company to incur significant 

24expenses; and any expiry of an issued patent may negatively impact the underlying technology. 

To protect its trade secrets, the Company enters into confidentiality undertakings with parties that have access to them, 
such as the Company’s current and prospective distributors, collaborators, employees and consultants, but a party may 
breach the undertakings and disclose the Company’s confidential information or competitors might learn of the information 
in some other way, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 

The Company uses processes, technology, products, or information, the rights to certain of which are owned by others, 
such as a license from the NRC of the lung antibody used by the Company for L-DOS47.  Termination or expiry of any 
licenses or rights during critical periods, and an inability to obtain them on commercially favourable terms or at all could 
have a material adverse effect on the Company and its drug candidates’ development. 

The Company operates in an industry that experiences substantial litigation involving the manufacture, use and sale of 
new products that are the subject of conflicting proprietary rights.  The Company or one or more of its licensors may be 
subject to a claim of infringement of proprietary rights by a third party.  It is possible that the Company’s products and 
technologies do infringe the rights of third parties, and the Company or such licensor could incur significant expenses, 
and diversion of management attention, in defending allegations of infringement of proprietary rights, even if there is no 
infringement.  Furthermore, the Company or such licensors may be required to modify its products or obtain licenses for 
intellectual property rights as a result of any alleged proprietary infringement.  The inability to modify products or obtain 
licenses on commercially reasonable terms, in a timely manner or at all, could adversely affect the Company’s business. 

The Company faces research and development risks, including the need to prove the Company’s drug candidates are 
safe and effective in clinical trials 

The Company’s drug candidates are complex compounds and the Company faces difficult challenges in connection with 
the  manufacture  of  clinical  batches  of  each  of  them,  which  could  further  delay  or  otherwise  negatively  affect  the 
Company’s planned clinical trials, or required regulatory approvals. 

There is also the risk that the Company could obtain negative findings or factors that may become apparent during the 
course of research or development.  The results from preclinical and clinical trials may not be predictive of results obtained 
in any ongoing or future clinical trials.  A number of companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry have 
suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after achieving promising results in earlier trials and pre-
clinical trials. 

The timing and success of the Company’s clinical trials also depend on a number of other factors, including, but not 
limited to: (a) obtaining additional financing, which is not assured; (b) sufficient patient enrolment, which may be affected 
by the incidence of the disease studied, the size of the patient population, the nature of the protocol, the proximity of 
patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for a patient to participate in the study and the rate of patient drop-out; (c) 
regulatory  agency  policies  regarding  requirements  for  approval of  a  drug,  including  granting  permission to  undertake 
proposed human testing; (d) the Company’s capacity to produce sufficient quantities and qualities of clinical trial materials 
to meet the trial schedule; (e) performance by third parties, on whom the Company relies to carry out its clinical trials; 
and (f) the approval of protocols and/or protocol amendments. 

Clinical trials are complex, expensive and uncertain, and have a high risk of failure, which can occur at any stage.  Data 
obtained from pre-clinical and clinical trials may be interpreted in different ways, or be incorrectly reported, which could 
delay or prevent further development of the drug candidate studied.  Failure to complete clinical trials successfully and 
to obtain successful results on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 

Even  if  the  Company’s  drug  candidates  successfully  complete  the  clinical  trials  and  receive  the  regulatory  approval 
necessary to market the drug candidates to the public, there is also the risk of unknown side effects, which may not 
appear until the drug candidates are on the market and may result in delay or denial of regulatory approval or withdrawal 
of previous approvals, product recalls or other adverse events, which could materially adversely affect the Company. 

While  the  Company  continues  to  explore  opportunities  to  expand  its  drug  product  pipeline  with  new  DOS47-based 
therapeutics  pending  the  identification  of  further  tumour  targeting agents,  there  can  be  no  assurance  that  any  such 
tumour targeting agents will be identified or that any new DOS47-based therapeutics will be developed. 

Difficulty in enrolling patients in the Company’s clinical trials, could result in delays or cancellation of clinical trials 

As the Company’s product candidates advance from preclinical testing to clinical testing, and then through progressively 
larger and more complex clinical trials, the Company will need to enroll an increasing number of patients that meet various 
eligibility criteria. There is significant competition for recruiting cancer patients in clinical trials, and the Company may be 
unable  to  enroll  the  patients  it  needs  to  complete  clinical  trials  on  a  timely  basis  or  at  all.  The  factors  that  affect  the 
Company’s ability to enroll patients is largely uncontrollable and include, but are not limited to, the following: 

25 size and nature of the patient population;
 eligibility and exclusion criteria for the trial;
 design of the study protocol;
 competition with other companies for clinical sites or patients;
 the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;
 the patient referral practices of physicians; and
 the number, availability, location and accessibility of clinical trial sites.

The Company is dependent on a number of third parties and the failure or delay in the performance of one of these third 
parties’ obligations may adversely affect the Company 

The Company is dependent on third parties to varying degrees in virtually all aspects of its business, including without 
limitation, on contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, clinical trial consultants, raw material 
suppliers,  collaborative  research  consultants,  regulatory  affairs  advisers,  medical  and  scientific  advisors,  clinical  trial 
investigators, business service providers and other third parties.  Critical supplies may not be available from third parties 
on acceptable terms, or at all, including GMP grade materials.  Service providers may not perform, or continue to perform, 
as needed, or be available to provide the required services on acceptable terms or at all.  Any lack of or interruption in 
supplies of raw materials or services, or any change in supply or service providers or any inability to secure new supply 
or  service  providers,  would  have  an  adverse  impact  on  the  development  and  commercialization  of  the  Company’s 
products.  For example, the Company has previously experienced delays in the manufacturing of both engineering and 
clinical batches of L-DOS47, which have in turn caused delays in the progression of its development program, and there 
may be further delays.  The Company relies on a third party for its supply of urease and if the contract with the third-party 
urease supplier is terminated early, the Company will have to find a new supplier of urease, as well as a new manufacturer 
of bulk drug product for future clinical testing programs.  There can be no assurance that a new supplier or manufacturer 
can be contracted in a timely manner or at all, and this could negatively impact the Company’s development plans for L-
DOS47. 

With respect to L-DOS47, the Company is currently dependent on, in addition to third party suppliers, manufacturers and 
consultants, the NRC and its license to the Company of a lung cancer antibody in order to develop and commercialize 
L-DOS47.  Early termination of the license with NRC would have a material adverse effect on the further development of 
L-DOS47  and  may  require  the  cessation  of  such  development,  which  would  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the 
Company. 

Given the Company`s lack of financing, expertise, infrastructure and other resources to support a new drug product from 
clinical development to marketing, the Company also requires strategic partner support to develop and commercialize its 
drug candidates.  There can be no assurance that such strategic partner support will be obtained upon acceptable terms 
or at all. 

The Company relies heavily on contract manufacturers for the production of product required for its clinical trials, product 
formulation work, scaling-up experiments and commercial production.  The Company may not be able to obtain new, or 
keep its current, contract manufacturers to provide these services.  Even if the Company does, contract manufacturers 
may  not  be  reliable  in  meeting  its  requirements  for  cost,  quality,  quantity  or  schedule,  or  the  requirements  of  any 
regulatory agencies.  The Company may not be able to manufacture products in quantities or qualities that would enable 
the  Company  to  meet  its  business  objectives,  and  failure  to  do  so  would  materially  adversely  affect  the  Company’s 
business. 

If the Company can successfully develop markets for its products, the Company would have to arrange for their scaled-
up manufacture.  There can be no assurance that the Company will, on a timely basis, be able to make the transition 
from  manufacturing  clinical  trial  quantities  to  commercial  production  quantities  successfully  or  be  able  to  arrange  for 
scaled-up commercial contract manufacturing.  Any potential difficulties experienced by the Company in manufacturing 
scale-up, including recalls or safety alerts, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial 
condition, and results of operations. 

The marketability of the Company’s products may be affected by delays and the inability to obtain necessary approvals, 
and  following  any  market  approval,  the  Company’s  products  will  be  subject  to  ongoing  regulatory  review  and 
requirements  which  may  continue  to  affect  their  marketability,  including  but  not  limited  to  regulatory  review  of  drug 
pricing,  healthcare  reforms  or  the  payment  and  reimbursement  policies  for  drugs  by  the  various  insurers  and  other 
payors in the industry 

The  research,  development,  manufacture  and  marketing  of  pharmaceutical  products  are  subject  to  regulation  by  the 
FDA,  and  comparable  regulatory  authorities  in  other  countries.  These  agencies  and  others  regulate  the  testing, 
manufacture,  safety  and  promotion  of  the  Company’s  products.  The  Company  must  receive  applicable  regulatory 
approval of a product candidate before it can be commercialized in any particular jurisdiction.  Approval by a regulatory 
authority of one country does not ensure the approval by regulatory authorities of other countries.  Changes in regulatory 
approval  policies  or  regulations  during  the  development  period  may  cause  delays  in  the  approval  or  rejection  of  an 

26application.  Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any 
application, or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval, or require additional preclinical, clinical or other trials 
and place the Company’s IND submissions on hold for an indeterminate amount of time.  The development and regulatory 
approval process in each jurisdiction takes many years, requires the expenditure of substantial resources, is uncertain 
and  subject  to  delays,  and  can  adversely  affect  the  successful  development  and  commercialization  of  our  drug 
candidates. 

Even if the Company obtains marketing approval in a particular jurisdiction, there may be limits on the approval and the 
Company’s products likely will be subject to ongoing regulatory review and regulatory requirements in that jurisdiction. 
Pharmaceutical  companies  are  subject  to  various  government  regulations,  including  without  limitation,  requirements 
regarding occupational safety, laboratory practices, environmental protection and hazardous substance control, and may 
be subject to other present and future regulations. 

The availability of reimbursement by governmental and other third-party payors, such as private insurance plans, will 
affect the market for any pharmaceutical product, and such payors tend to continually attempt to contain or reduce the 
costs of healthcare.  Significant uncertainty exists with respect to the reimbursement status of newly approved healthcare 
products. 

The Company operates in an industry that is more susceptible than others to legal proceedings and, in particular, liability 
claims 

The Company operates in an industry that is more susceptible to legal proceedings than firms in other industries, due to 
the  uncertainty  involved  in  the  development  of  pharmaceuticals.    Defense  and  prosecution  of  legal  claims  can  be 
expensive and time consuming, and may adversely affect the Company regardless of the outcome due to the diversion 
of  financial,  management  and  other  resources  away  from  the  Company’s  primary  operations.    Negative  judgments 
against the Company, even if the Company is planning to appeal such a decision, or even a settlement in a case, could 
negatively affect the cash reserves of the Company, and could have a material negative effect on the development of its 
drug products. 

The Company may be exposed, in particular, to liability claims which are uninsured or not sufficiently insured, and any 
claims may adversely affect the Company’s ability to obtain insurance in the future or result in negative publicity regarding 
the efficacy of its drug products.  Such liability insurance is expensive, its ability is limited and it may not be available on 
terms that are acceptable to the Company, if at all. 

The use of any of the Company’s unapproved products under development, the use of its products in clinical trials, and, 
if regulatory approval is received, the sale of such products, may expose the Company to liability claims which could 
materially adversely affect the Company’s business.  The Company may not be able to maintain or obtain commercially 
reasonable liability insurance for future products, and any claims under any insurance policies may adversely affect its 
ability  to  maintain  existing  policies  or  to  obtain  new  insurance  on  existing  or  future  products.    Even  with  adequate 
insurance coverage, publicity associated with any such claim could adversely affect public opinion regarding the safety 
or  efficacy  of  the  Company’s  products.    As  a  result,  any  product  liability  claim  or  recall,  including  in  connection  with 
products previously sold by the Company through its former distribution business, could materially adversely affect the 
Company’s business. 

If  the  Company  were  unable  to  maintain  product  liability  insurance  required  by  our  third  parties,  the  corresponding 
agreements would be subject to termination, which could have a material adverse impact on our operations. 

Some  of  our  licensing  and  other  agreements  with  third  parties  require  or  might  require  us  to  maintain  product  liability 
insurance.  If  the  Company  cannot  maintain  acceptable  amounts  of  coverage  on  commercially  reasonable  terms  in 
accordance with the terms set forth in these agreements, the corresponding agreements would be subject to termination, 
which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations. 

The Company is dependent upon key personnel; Director residency requirements 

The Company’s ability to continue its development of potential products depends on its ability to attract and maintain 
qualified key individuals to serve in management and on the Board.  However, the Company does not currently have a 
formal succession plan for members of its senior management team or for its Board and, because competition for qualified 
key individuals with experience relevant to the industry in which the Company operates is intense, the Company may not 
be able to attract and/or retain such personnel.  Additionally, applicable corporate law requires that at least 25% of the 
Company’s directors be resident Canadians, and the Company’s articles provide that the Company cannot have fewer 
than five directors at any time.   

Consequently, if the Company is unable to attract and/or loses and is unable to replace key personnel, its business could 
be negatively affected and, in particular, if the Company loses one or more of its three current resident Canadian directors 
in the future and is unable to find a sufficient number of resident Canadian directors to fill the resulting vacancy(ies), the 

27Board will be prevented from taking any action other than appointing additional resident Canadian directors until such 
time  as  a  sufficient  number  of  new  resident  Canadian  directors  have  been  appointed  such  that  at  least  25%  of  the 
Company’s directors are resident Canadians.   

In addition, the Company does not carry key-man insurance on any individuals.  

The  Company’s  employees  and  consultants  may  engage  in  misconduct  or  other  improper  activities,  including  non-
compliance with regulatory  standards and requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s 
business. 

The Company is exposed to the risk of employee and consultant fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees 
and  consultants  could  include,  but  are  not  limited  to  the  following:  failure  to  comply  with  regulators,  failure  to  provide 
accurate  information,  failure  to  comply  with  manufacturing  standards  the  Company  has  established,  jurisdictional 
healthcare fraud and abuse of laws and regulations, failure to report financial information or data accurately or disclose 
unauthorized activities. For example, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject 
to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing, and other abusive practices. These 
laws  and  regulations  may  restrict  or  prohibit  a  wide  range  of  pricing,  discounting,  marketing  and  promotion,  sales 
commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee and consultant misconduct could 
also  involve  the  improper  use  of  information  obtained  in  the  course  of  clinical  trials,  which  could  result  in  regulatory 
sanctions and serious harm to the Company’s reputation.  If any such actions are instituted against the Company, and the 
Company is not successful in defending itself or asserting its rights, those actions could have a substantial impact on the 
Company’s business and operating results, including the imposition of substantial fines, halt in trading of the Company’s 
common shares, possible delisting and/or other sanctions. 

Indemnification obligations to directors and officers of the Company may adversely affect the Company’s finances 

The Company has entered into agreements pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify its directors and 
senior management in respect of certain claims made against them while acting in their capacity as such.  If the Company 
is called upon to perform its indemnity obligations, its finances may be adversely affected. 

The Company’s finances may fluctuate based on foreign currency exchange rates 

The Company operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risks from various currencies, primarily the 
U.S. dollar, the Euro and the Polish Zloty. 

Unanticipated changes in the Company’s tax rates could affect its future results 

Since the Company operates in different countries and is subject to taxation in different jurisdictions, its future effective 
tax  rates  could  be  impacted  by  changes  in  such  countries’  tax  laws  or  their  interpretations.  Both  domestic  and 
international tax laws are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, evolution of 
regulation  and  court  rulings.  The  application  of  these  tax  laws  and  related  regulations  is  subject  to  legal  and  factual 
interpretation, judgment and uncertainty.  

Shareholders of the Company may face dilution through exercise of stock options, warrants and future equity financings 

To attract and retain key personnel, the Company has granted options to its key employees, directors and consultants to 
purchase common shares and share awards as non-cash incentives.  In addition, the Company has a significant number 
of warrants to purchase common shares outstanding.  The issuance of shares pursuant to share awards and the exercise 
of  a  significant  number  of  such  options  and  warrants  may  result  in  significant  dilution  of  other  shareholders  of  the 
Company. 

As noted above, the Company needs additional funding and has historically turned to the equity markets to raise this 
funding.  The future sale of equity and warrants may also result in significant dilution to the shareholders of the Company. 

The Company’s share price and trading volumes are volatile and the Company may have difficulty maintaining listing 
requirements 

The  price  of  the  Company’s  common  shares,  as  well  as  market  prices  for  securities  of  biopharmaceutical  and  drug 
delivery companies generally, have historically been highly volatile, and have from time to time experienced significant 
price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.   

The trading price of the Company’s common shares is subject to change and could in the future fluctuate significantly. 
The fluctuations could be in response to numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including: quarterly variations 
in results of operations; announcements of technological innovations or new products by the Company, its customers or 
competitors;  changes  in  securities  analysts’  recommendations;  announcements  of  acquisitions;  changes  in  earnings 

28estimates made by independent analysts; general fluctuations in the stock market; or revenue and results of operations 
below the expectations of public market securities analysts or investors. Any of these could result in a sharp decline in 
the market price of the common shares. 

The  Internet  offers  various  avenues  for  the  dissemination  of  information.  The  Company  has  no  control  over  the 
information that is distributed and discussed on electronic bulletin boards and investment chat rooms. The intention of 
the  people  or  organizations  that  distribute  such  information  may  not  be  in  the  Company’s  best  interest  and  the  best 
interests of its shareholders. This, in addition to other forms of investment information including newsletters and research 
publications, could result in a sharp decline in the market price of the common shares. 

In addition, stock markets have occasionally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The market prices for 
high-technology  companies  have been  particularly affected  by  these market  fluctuations and such  effects  have  often 
been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause a decline 
in the market price of the common shares. 

Sales  of  substantial  numbers  of  the  Company’s  common  shares  could  cause  a  decline  in  the  market  price  of  such 
common  shares.    There  are  minimum  listing  requirements  for  an  issuer  to  maintain  its  listing  on  the  Toronto  Stock 
Exchange (“TSX”), and if the Company fails to maintain these listing requirements, it may be involuntarily delisted from 
the TSX.  De-listing the Company or the Company shares from any securities exchange could have a negative effect on 
the liquidity of the Company shares and/or the ability of a shareholder to trade in shares of the Company, and could have 
an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to raise future equity financings.  The Company’s common shares trade in a 
very low volume compared to the number of common shares outstanding.  This means a shareholder could have difficulty 
disposing of common shares, especially if there are other shareholders of the Company trying to sell their shares in the 
Company at the same time.  Volatility in share price and trading volumes could have an adverse effect on the Company’s 
ability to raise future equity financings. 

The requirements of being a public company may strain the Company’s resources, divert management’s attention and 
affect its ability to attract and retain qualified board members 

As a public company, the Company is subject to the reporting requirements of Canadian securities regulators, the listing 
requirements of the Exchange and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and 
regulations may increase the Company’s legal and financial compliance costs, may make some activities more difficult, 
time-consuming  or  costly  and  may  increase  the  demand  on  the  Company’s  systems  and  resources.  Being  a  public 
company requires that the Company file continuous disclosure documents, including, among other things, annual and 
quarterly financial statements. Management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have 
a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company may 
need to hire more employees in the future, which will increase its costs and expenses. 

In  addition,  changing  laws,  regulations  and  standards  relating  to  corporate  governance  and  public  disclosure  create 
uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time 
consuming. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by 
ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. The Company may invest resources to comply with evolving 
laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and 
a  diversion  of  management’s  time  and  attention  from  revenue-generating  activities  to  compliance  activities.  If  the 
Company’s efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory 
authorities, legal proceedings may be initiated against the Company and its business may be harmed. 

Trading in the Company’s common shares outside of Canada may be subject to restrictions on trading under foreign 
securities  laws,  and  purchasers  of  securities  under  private  placements  by  the  Company  will  be  subject  to  certain 
restrictions on trading 

The  Company’s  common  shares  trade  on  the  TSX  and  are  freely  tradeable  only  in  Canada.    As  such,  shareholders 
trading the Company’s common shares outside of Canada may be subject to restrictions imposed by foreign securities 
laws that may restrict their ability to transfer shares freely or at all.  Certain securities offered by the Company pursuant 
to its private placements, including the unlisted warrants issued by the Company, are subject to certain initial hold periods 
and other restrictions on trading imposed by applicable securities laws and, in the case of the warrants, pursuant to the 
terms  of  the  applicable  warrant  certificates.    These  restrictions  may  affect  the  liquidity  of  the  investment  of  certain 
shareholders in the securities of the Company. 

General economic conditions may have an adverse effect on the Company and its business 

Continuing  global  economic volatility  and uncertainty may  have  an  adverse  effect  on  the Company and  its  business, 
including without limitation the ability to raise additional financing, to obtain strategic partner support or commercialization 
opportunities and alliances for the Company’s new drug candidates, and to obtain continued services and supplies. 

29The  Company’s  business  involves  environmental  risks  that  could  result  in  accidental  contamination,  injury,  and 
significant capital expenditures in order to comply with environmental laws and regulations 

The  Company  and  its commercial  collaborators are subject  to  laws  and  regulations governing the use,  manufacture, 
storage, handling and disposal of materials and certain waste products.  Although the Company believes that its safety 
procedures comply with the regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be 
eliminated.  In the event of such an accident, the Company could be held liable for any damages that result and any such 
liability could exceed the resources of the Company.  The Company is not specifically insured with respect to this liability.  
The Company (or its collaborators) may be required to incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and 
regulations in the future; and the operations, business or assets of the Company may be materially adversely affected 
by current or future environmental laws or regulations. 

Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal controls may result in material misstatements of our  consolidated 
financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or fail to prevent fraud;  and in that case, our 
shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm our  business, could negatively impact 
the price of our common shares and prevent the Company from raising additional capital. 

Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If the 
Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, the Company may not be able to report its financial 
results accurately or prevent fraud; and in that case, the Company’s shareholders could lose confidence in our financial 
reporting, which would harm our business, negatively impact the price of the Company’s common shares and also prevent 
the Company from raising additional capital.  Even if we were to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting 
provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial 
statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  IFRS  as  issued  by  the  IASB,  because  of  its  inherent  limitations, 
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect fraud or misstatements. Failure to achieve and maintain 
effective  internal control over financial reporting could prevent the Company from complying with its reporting obligations 
on a timely basis, which could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of the Company’s consolidated 
financial  statements,  harm  our  business,  negatively  impact  the  trading  price  of  our  common  shares  and  prevent  the 
Company from raising additional capital. 

RISK FACTORS IN OTHER PUBLIC FILINGS 

For all of the reasons set forth above, together with those additional risk factors identified under the headings “Forward-Looking 
Statements”  and  “Risk Factors”  in  the  Company’s most  recent  Annual  Information  Form filed under  the  Company’s  profile on 
SEDAR at www.sedar.com, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.  Other than any obligation 
to disclose material information under applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any 
forward-looking information after the date hereof. 

Data relevant to estimated market sizes and penetration for the Company’s lead products under development are presented in 
this MD&A.  This data has been obtained from a variety of published resources including published scientific literature, websites 
and information generally available through publicized means.  The Company attempts to source reference data from multiple 
sources  whenever  possible  for  confirmatory  purposes.    Although  the  Company  believes  the  foregoing  data  is  reliable,  the 
Company has not independently verified the accuracy and completeness of this data. 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

Additional information  relating  to  the  Company’s fiscal year  ended  July  31,  2019,  is  available  under  the  Company’s profile  on 
SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 

October 24, 2019 

_________ 

30Consolidated Financial Statements of Helix BioPharma Corp. 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 

31MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR 
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Helix BioPharma Corp. and other financial information contained in this 
annual report are the responsibility of management.  The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with 
International  Financial  Reporting  Standards,  using  management’s  best  estimates  and  judgments,  where  appropriate.    In  the 
opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements reflect fairly the financial position and the results of operations 
and cash flows of the Company within reasonable limits of materiality.  The financial information contained elsewhere in this annual 
report has been reviewed to ensure consistency with that in the consolidated financial statements. 

To  assist  management  in  discharging  these  responsibilities,  the  Company  maintains  an  effective  system  of  procedures  and 
internal controls which is designed to provide reasonable assurance that its assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized 
use or disposition, that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and that the financial records 
form a reliable base for the preparation of accurate and reliable financial information. 

The Board of Directors ensures that management fulfills its responsibilities for the financial reporting and internal control.  The 
Board of Directors exercises this responsibility through its independent Audit Committee comprising a majority of unrelated and 
outside directors.  The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and annually with the external auditors to review 
audit recommendations and any matters that the auditors believe should be brought to the attention of the Board of Directors.  The 
Audit Committee also reviews the consolidated financial statements and recommends to the Board of Directors that the statements 
be approved for issuance to the shareholders. 

The consolidated financial statements have been audited by BDO Canada LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed 
Public Accountants, which has full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.  BDO Canada LLP’s report on the consolidated 
financial statements is presented herein. 

/s/ Heman Chao 
Heman Chao 
Chief Executive Officer 

October 24, 2019 

/s/ Frank Michalargias 
Frank Michalargias 
Chief Financial Officer 

32BDO Canada LLP 
60 Columbia Way, Suite 300 
Markham, Ontario, L3R 0C9 
Canada 

Telephone (905) 946-1066 
Fax (905) 946-9524 
www.bdo.ca 

Independent Auditor's Report

To the Shareholders of Helix BioPharma Corp. 

Opinion 

We  have  audited  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Helix  BioPharma  Corp.  and  its  subsidiaries  (the  “Group”),  which 
comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at July 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated statements of net 
loss  and  comprehensive  loss,  changes  in  shareholders’  equity  and  cash  flows  for  the  years  then  ended,  and  notes  to  the 
consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.  

In  our  opinion,  the  accompanying  consolidated  financial  statements  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  consolidated 
financial position of the Group as at July 31, 2019 and 2018 and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash 
flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). 

Basis for Opinion 

We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those 
standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of 
our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the 
consolidated  financial  statements  in  Canada,  and  we  have  fulfilled  our  other  ethical  responsibilities  in  accordance  with  these 
requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. 

Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern 

We  draw  attention  to  Note  1  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  which  indicates  that  the  Group  incurred  a  net  loss  of 
$7,526,000  during  the  year  ended  July  31,  2019  and,  as  of  that  date,  the  Group's  cash  of  $206,000  is  insufficient  to  meet 
anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures through the next twelve months. As stated in Note 1, these 
events  or conditions, along  with  other matters  as  set  forth  in  Note  1,  indicate  that  a material  uncertainty  exists  that  may  cast 
significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter. 

Other Information  

Management is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises: 

•

•

The information, other than the consolidated financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon, included in the 2019
Annual Report, and

The information included in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of 
assurance conclusion thereon. 

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified 
above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements 
or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.  

We obtained Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the years ended July 
31, 2019 and 2018 and the 2019 Annual Report prior to the date of this auditor’s report. If, based on the work we have performed 
on this other information, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that 
fact in this auditor’s report. We have nothing to report in this regard.  

33Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with 
IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial 
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a 
going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless 
management either intends to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.  

Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process. 

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from 
material  misstatement,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error,  and  to  issue  an  auditor’s  report  that  includes  our  opinion.  Reasonable 
assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally 
accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error 
and  are considered  material  if,  individually  or  in  the  aggregate,  they  could  reasonably be  expected  to  influence  the  economic 
decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements. 

As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and 
maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:  

•

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error,
design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one
resulting  from  error,  as  fraud  may  involve  collusion,  forgery,  intentional  omissions,  misrepresentations,  or  the  override  of
internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.

•

•

•

Evaluate  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies  used  and  the  reasonableness  of  accounting  estimates  and  related
disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are
inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s
report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures,
and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves 
fair presentation.

• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the
Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and
performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit 
and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.  

We  also  provide  those  charged  with  governance  with  a  statement  that  we  have  complied  with  relevant  ethical  requirements 
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to 
bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards. 

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Brion Hendry. 

/s/ BDO Canada LLP 
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants 
Markham, Ontario 
October 24, 2019 

34HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 
In thousands of Canadian dollars 
As at July 31, 2019 and 2018 

As at: 

ASSETS 

Non-current assets 

Property, plant and equipment (note 4) 

Current assets 

Prepaid expenses 
Accounts receivable 
Cash 

Total assets 

SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY AND LIABILITIES 

Shareholders’ deficiency (note 5) 

Current liabilities 

Deferred government grant (note 11) 
Accrued liabilities 
Accounts payable 

July 31, 2019 

July 31, 2018 

$ 

253 
253 

191 
290 
206 
687 

$ 

374 
374 

92 
315 
366 
773 

$ 

940 

$ 

1,147 

$ 

(3,281) 

$ 

(1,527) 

124 
1,057 
3,040 
4,221 

38 
644 
 1,992 
2,674 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficiency 

$ 

940 

$ 

1,147 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

On behalf of the Board of Directors: 

/s/ Slawomir Majewski 
Slawomir Majewski, 
Chair, Board of Directors 

/s/ Artur Gabor 
Artur Gabor 
Chair, Audit Committee 

35 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Consolidated Statement of Net Loss and Comprehensive Loss 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 (In thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts) 

Expenses 

Research and development (note 10) 
Operating, general and administration (note 12) 

Results from operating activities before finance items 

Finance items 

Finance income 
Finance expense 
Foreign exchange loss 

2019 

2018 

5,006 
2,486 

(7,492) 

3 
(1) 
(36) 

(34) 

6,084 
2,462 

(8,546) 

9 
(29) 
(59) 

(79) 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss 

$ 

(7,526) 

$ 

(8,625) 

Loss per common share 

Basic 
Diluted 

$ 
$ 

(0.07) 
 (0.07) 

$ 
(0.09) 
$      (0.09) 

Weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of  

basic and diluted loss per share 

106,645,801 

99,928,708 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

36 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 (In thousands of Canadian dollars, except common share and warrant numbers) 

     Common shares                      warrants            

Share purchase 

Amount 

Number 

Amount 

Number  Options 

Contributed 
surplus 

Shareholder 
deficiency 

Deficit 

Balances, July 31, 2017  $ 120,681  95,711,579  $  11,141  27,980,975 
– 
Net loss for the year 
Common stock, issued 
– 
7,098,000 
Warrants, issued 
– 
Warrants, expired unexercised 
– 
Warrants, exercised 
– 
Stock-based compensation 
– 
Options, exercised 
– 
Options, expired unexercised 

– 
7,098,000 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
4,884 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
2,221 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

Balances, July 31, 2018  $ 125,565  102,809,579  $  13,362  35,078,975 
– 
Net loss for the year 
– 
Common stock, issued 
8,415,922 
Warrants, issued 
(122,000) 
Warrants, expired unexercised 
– 
Warrants, exercised 
– 
Stock-based compensation 
– 
Options, exercised 
– 
Options, expired unexercised 

– 
8,415,922 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
1,444 
(43) 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
3,967 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

$  673  $  22,868  $ (155,380) 
(8,625) 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
10 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

$  683  $  22,868  $ (164,005) 
(7,526) 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
361 
– 
(404) 

– 
– 
– 
43 
– 
– 
– 
404 

$ 

 (17) 
(8,625) 
4,884 
2,221 
– 
– 
10 
– 
– 

$  (1,527) 
(7,526) 
3,967 
1,444 
– 
– 
361 
– 
– 

Balances, July 31, 2019  $ 129,532  111,225,501  $  14,763  43,372,897 

$  640  $  23,315  $ (171,531) 

$  (3,281) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

37 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 (In thousands of Canadian dollars) 

Cash flows from operating activities 

Net loss and total comprehensive loss 

Items not involving cash: 

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 
Stock-based compensation 
Foreign exchange loss 

Change in non-cash working capital: 

Accounts receivable 
Prepaid expenses 
Accounts payable 
Accrued liabilities 
Deferred liabilities 

Net cash used in operating activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 

Proceeds from the issuance of common shares and 
share purchase warrants, net of issue costs 

Net cash provided by financing activities 

Cash flows from investing activities 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment 

Net cash used in investing activities 

Foreign exchange loss on cash 

Net decrease in cash 

Cash, beginning of year 

Cash, end of year 

2019 

2018 

$ 

(7,526) 

$ 

(8,625) 

125 
361 
36 

25 
(99) 
1,048 
413 
86 

(5,531) 

5,411 

5,411 

(4) 

(4) 

(36) 

165 
10 
60 

315 
81 
554 
(78) 
(6) 

(7,524) 

7,105 
7,105 

(53) 

(53) 

(59) 

$ 

(160) 

$ 

(531) 

366 

206 

$ 

897 
366 

$ 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

38 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

Helix  BioPharma  Corp.  (the  “Company”),  incorporated  under  the  Canada  Business  Corporations  Act,  is  an  immune-oncology 
company  primarily  focused  in  the  areas  of  cancer  prevention  and  treatment.    The  Company  has  funded  its  research  and 
development activities, mainly through the issuance of common shares and warrants.  The Company expects to incur additional 
losses and therefore will require additional financial resources, on an ongoing basis.  It is not possible to predict the outcome of 
future research and development activities or the financing thereof. 

1.  Basis of presentation and going concern 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which assumes that the Company will 
continue in operation for the foreseeable future and, accordingly, will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the 
normal course of operations.  The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent mainly on obtaining additional 
financing.  The Company does not have sufficient cash to meet anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures 
through the next twelve months.   

The  Company  reported  a consolidated net  loss and total comprehensive loss of $7,526,000 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 
2019 (July 31, 2018 - $8,625,000).  As at July 31, 2019 the Company had a working capital deficiency of $3,534,000, shareholders’ 
deficiency of $3,281,000 and a deficit of $171,531,000.  As at July 31, 2018 the Company had a working capital deficiency of 
$1,901,000, shareholders’ deficiency of $1,527,000 and a deficit of $164,005,000.  The Company will require additional financing 
in the immediate near term and in the future to see the current research and development initiates through to completion.  There 
can be no assurance however, that additional financing can be obtained in a timely manner, or at all. 

Not raising sufficient additional financing on a timely basis may result in delays and possible termination of all or some of the 
Company’s research and development initiatives, and as a result, may cast significant doubt as to the ability of the Company to 
operate as a going concern and accordingly, the appropriateness of the use of the accounting principles applicable to a going 
concern.  These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the carrying amount and classification of 
reported assets, liabilities and expenses that might be necessary should the Company not be successful in its aforementioned 
initiatives.  Any such adjustments could be material.  The Company cannot predict whether it will be able to raise the necessary 
funds it needs to continue as a going concern. 

Statement of compliance  
The  Company’s  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International 
Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee.    

The  consolidated  financial  statements  of  the  Company  were  approved  and  authorized  for  issue  by  the  Board  of  Directors  on 
October 23, 2019. 

Use of estimates and critical judgment 
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make critical judgments, estimates and assumptions 
that affect the reported amounts of expenses, assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities, at the  reporting 
date. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its judgments, estimates and assumptions using historical experience  and 
various  other  factors  it  believes  to  be  reasonable  under  the  given  circumstances.  Actual  outcomes  may  differ  from  these 
estimates that could require a material adjustment to the reported carrying amounts in the future. 

The most significant critical estimates and judgments made by management include the following: 

a)  Going Concern 

Significant  judgments  related  to  the  Company’s  ability  to  continue  as  a  going  concern are disclosed in the first paragraph 
above in Note 1. 

b)  Clinical study expenses 

Clinical study expenses are accrued based on services received and efforts expanded pursuant to contracts with contract research 
organizations  (“CROs”),  consultants,  clinical  study  sites  and  other  vendors.    In  the  normal  course  of  business,  the  Company 
contracts with third parties to perform various clinical study activities.  The financial terms of these agreements vary from contract 
to contract and are subject to negotiations that may result in uneven payment outflows.  Payments under the contracts depend on 
various factors such as the achievement of certain events, the successful enrolment of patients or the completion of portions of 
the  clinical  study  and/or  other  similar  conditions.    The  Company  determines  the  accruals  by  reviewing  contracts,  vendor 
agreements and purchase orders, and through discussions with internal personnel and external providers as to the progress or 
stage of completion of the clinical studies or services and the agreed-upon fee to be paid for such services.  However, actual costs 
and timing of the Company’s clinical studies is uncertain, subject to risk and may change depending upon a number of factors, 
including the Company’s clinical development plans and trial protocols. 

39 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

c)  Valuation of share-based compensation and warrants 

Management measures the costs for share-based compensation and warrants using market-based option valuation  techniques. 
Assumptions are made and estimates are used in applying the valuation techniques. These include estimating  the future volatility 
of the share price, expected dividend yield, future employee turnover  rates,  a n d   future  exercise  behaviours. Such  estimates 
and assumptions are inherently uncertain.  Changes in these assumptions affect the fair value estimates of share-based payments 
and warrants. 

d) 

Income taxes 

Deferred  tax  assets,  including those  arising  from unutilized tax  losses,  require  management  to  assess 
the  likelihood  that  the 
Company  will  generate  future  taxable  income  in  future  years  in  order  to  utilize  any  deferred  tax  asset  which  has  been 
recognized. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash  flows. At the current statement of financial position 
date, no deferred tax assets have been recognized in these  financial statements. 

e) 

Impairment of long-lived assets 

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances indicating that  the 
carrying  value  of  the  asset  may  not  be  recoverable.  For  the  purpose  of  measuring  recoverable  amounts,  assets  are  grouped 
at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). The recoverable  amount is the 
higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use (being the present value of the expected future  cash flows of the 
relevant asset or cash-generating unit). An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the  asset’s carrying amount 
exceeds its recoverable amount. Management evaluates impairment losses for potential reversals  when events or circumstances 
warrant such consideration. 

Functional and presentation currency 
The functional and presentation currency of the Company is the Canadian dollar. 

2.  Significant accounting policies 

The  accounting  policies  set  out  below  have  been  applied  consistently  to  all  periods  presented  in  these  consolidated  financial 
statements. 

Basis of consolidation 
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries listed below. Control is achieved 
when  the  Company  has  the power  to  govern  the  financial and  operating  policies  of  an  entity  so  as  to  obtain  benefits  from its 
activities.  Subsidiaries  are  fully  consolidated  from  the  date  on  which  control  is  acquired  by  the  Company.  Inter-company 
transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation. They are de-consolidated from the date that control by the Company 
ceases.  The consolidated financial statements include the assets and liabilities and results of operations of all subsidiaries after 
elimination of intercompany transactions and balances. 

As at July 31, 2019, the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company include:  Helix BioPharma Inc., incorporated in the USA, Helix 
Immuno-Oncology S.A., incorporated in Poland and Helix Product Development (Ireland) Limited, incorporated in Ireland. 

Cash 
The Company considers cash on hand, deposits in banks and bank term deposits with maturities of 90 days or less as cash. 

Property, plant and equipment 
Property,  plant  and  equipment  are  recorded  at  cost  less  accumulated  depreciation.  Impairment  charges  are  included  in 
accumulated depreciation. 

Depreciation is provided using the following methods and estimated useful life: 
Asset 
Computer equipment and software 
Furniture and fixtures 
Research and manufacturing equipment 
Leasehold improvements 

Basis 
Straight line 
Straight line 
Straight line 
Straight line 

Rate 
3 years 
5 years 
4-10 years 
Lease term 

40 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

Research and development costs 
Research costs are expensed as incurred.  Development costs are expensed as incurred except for those which meet the criteria 
for deferral, in which case, the costs are capitalized and amortized to operations over the estimated period of benefit.  No costs 
have been deferred to date. 

Investment tax credits 
The Company is entitled to Canadian federal and provincial investment tax credits, which are earned as a percentage of eligible 
research and development expenditures incurred in each taxation year.  Investment tax credits are accounted for as a reduction 
of the related expenditure for items of a current nature and a reduction of the related asset cost for items of a capital nature, 
provided that the Company has reasonable assurance that the tax credits will be realized. 

Stock-based compensation 
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments awarded to employees in accordance 
with the fair value method.  The fair value of stock options granted is determined at the appropriate measurement date using the 
Black-Scholes option pricing model, and generally expensed over the options’ vesting period for employee awards.  Awards with 
graded  vesting  are  considered  multiple  awards  for  fair  value  measurement  and  stock-based  compensation  calculation.    In 
determining the expense, the Company accounts for forfeitures using an estimate based on historical trends.  When stock-based 
compensation and other stock-based payments are awarded to persons other than non-employees, share capital is increased for 
the fair value of goods and services received. 

Foreign currency translation 
The  Company’s  currency  of  presentation  is  the  Canadian  dollar,  which  is  also  the  Company’s  functional  currency.    Foreign 
currency-denominated  items  are  translated  into  Canadian  dollars.    Monetary  assets  and  liabilities  in  foreign  currencies  are 
translated into Canadian dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates.  Non-monetary items are translated 
at historical exchange rates.  Revenue and expenses are translated at the exchange rates prevailing at their respective transaction 
dates.  Exchange gains and losses arising on translation are included in income. 

Income taxes 
The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under this method, deferred income tax 
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement 
carrying amounts of certain existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities 
are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those 
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax 
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date of substantive enactment.  Given the Company’s history of net 
losses and expected future losses, the Company is of the opinion that it is probable that these tax assets will not be realized in 
the foreseeable future and therefore, the deferred tax asset has not been recognized. 

Financial instruments 
The  Company’s  financial  assets  and  liabilities  are  initially  recorded  at  fair  value  and  subsequently  measured  based  on  their 
assigned classifications as follows. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial asset or liability and is 
determined at the time of initial recognition. 

Asset / Liability 
Cash 
Account Receivable 
Accounts Payable 
Accrued Liabilities 

Classification 
Amortized Cost 
Amortized Cost 
Amortized Cost 
Amortized Cost 

De-recognition of financial assets and liabilities 
De-recognition is applied for all or part of a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows and benefits from the 
financial asset expire, the Company loses controls of the assets, or the Company substantially transfers the significant risks and 
rewards of ownership of the asset. 

De-recognition is applied for all or part of a financial liability when the liability is extinguished due to cancellation or discharge or 
expiry of the obligation. 

41 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

Impairment 
(i) Financial assets: 
On an individual basis, material financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. 
Other  individually  non-material  financial  assets  are  tested  as  a  group  of  financial  assets  based  on  similar  risk  characteristic. 
Financial assets are considered to be impaired when based upon an expected loss model as prescribed by IFRS 9, taking into 
consideration both historic and forward-looking information. 

For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount 
and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial asset’s effective interest rate. Impairment losses 
are recognized in income and reflected in an allowance account against the respective financial asset. 

(ii) Non-financial assets: 
The carrying amounts of the Company’s non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is 
any indication of impairment.  If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. 

The recoverable amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell.  
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that 
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or cash-generating unit.  For 
the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets 
that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of cash inflows of other assets or cash-generating 
units.  An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its related cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated 
recoverable amount. 

Impairment losses recognized in prior periods are assessed each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased 
or no longer exists.  An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable 
amount.  An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount 
that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognized. 

Basic and diluted loss per common share 
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of 
shares outstanding during the reporting period.  Diluted loss per share is computed similarly to basic loss per share, except that 
the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares for the assumed exercise of stock options 
and warrants, if dilutive.  The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock options and warrants 
were exercised and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire common shares at the average market price 
during the reporting periods.  The inclusion of the Company’s stock options and warrants in the computation of diluted loss per 
share has an anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share and, therefore, they have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss 
per share. 

Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance 
Government grant funds are recognised in income when there is reasonable assurance that the Company has complied with the 
conditions attached to them and that the grant funds will be received.  Grant funds receivable are recognized in income over the 
periods in which the entity recognizes as expenses, the related costs for which the grant is intended to compensate. 

3.  New accounting standards and pronouncements not yet adopted 

New accounting standards 
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 
Effective  August  1,  2018,  the  Company  adopted  IFRS  9  Financial  Instruments  (IFRS  9)  which  replaced  IAS  39,  Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39). IFRS 9 includes revised guidance on the classification and measurement 
of financial assets and liabilities; new guidance for measuring impairment on financial assets; and new hedge accounting guidance. 

On adoption of IFRS 9, the Company has classified the financial assets and financial liabilities held at August 1, 2018, based on 
the  new  classification  requirements  and  the  characteristics  of  each  financial  instrument  as  at  the  transition  date.  The  new 
classification did not require a restatement of prior periods. 

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers 
The Company currently has no revenue stream as it is still in the research and development stage.  As it evolves out of that stage, 
the Company will have a closer look at how this standard will impact how it recognizes revenue. 

42 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

Future accounting standards 
New  accounting  standards  and  pronouncements  issued  but  not  yet  effective  up  to  the  date  of  issuance  of  the  Company's 
consolidated financial statements are listed below.  This listing includes standards and interpretations issued, which the Company 
reasonably expects to be applicable at a future date.  The Company intends to adopt those standards when they become effective. 

Certain pronouncements have been issued by the IASB or International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee.  Many of 
these updates are not applicable or are inconsequential to the Company and have been excluded from the discussion below: 

IFRS 16, Leases 
In  January  2016,  the  IASB  has  issued  IFRS  16  Leases  (“IFRS  16”),  its  new  leases  standard  that  requires  lessees  to 
recognize  assets  and  liabilities  for  most  leases  on  their  balance  sheets.  Lessees  applying  IFRS  16  will  have  a  single 
accounting model for all leases, with certain exemptions. Lessor accounting is substantially unchanged. The new standard  will 
be  effective  from January  1,  2019  with  limited  early application permitted.  The  Company  is  evaluating  the  impact  of  the  new 
standard on its results of operations, financial position and disclosures. 

4.  Property, plant and equipment 

Research equipment 
Manufacturing equipment 
Leasehold improvements 
Computer equipment 
Computer software 
Furniture and fixtures 

2019 

Cost 
$  1,689 
402 
359 
109 
62 
22 
$  2,643 

  Accumulated 
depreciation 
$  1,448 
402 
359 
105 
61 
15 
$  2,390 

$ 

Net book 
value 
241 
– 
– 
4 
1 
7 
253 

$ 

2018 

Cost 
$  1,689 
402 
359 
106 
61 
22 
$  2,639 

  Accumulated 
depreciation 
$  1,339 
402 
359 
93 
58 
14 
$  2,265 

$ 

Net book 
value 
350 
– 
– 
13 
3 
8 
374 

$ 

5.  Shareholders’ deficiency 

Preferred shares 
Authorized 10,000,000 preferred shares. 
As at July 31, 2019 and 2018 the Company had nil preferred shares issued and outstanding. 

Common shares and share purchase warrants 
Authorized unlimited common shares without par value. 
As at July 31, 2019 the Company had 111,225,501 (2018 – 102,809,579) common shares issued and outstanding. 

On August 31, 2017, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 1,092,500 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $1,311,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $1.50 until August 30, 2022.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $438,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $873,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling 
$221,000  were  proportionately  allocated  to  the  share  purchase  warrants  ($74,000)  and  the  common  shares  ($147,000), 
respectively. 

On October 19, 2017, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 3,258,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $3,910,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at  a  price  of  $1.50  until  October  18,  2022.    Of  the  gross  proceeds  amount,  $1,248,000  was  allocated  to  the  share  purchase 
warrants based on fair value and the residual amount of $2,662,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs 
totalling $555,000 were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($177,000) and the common shares ($378,000), 
respectively. 

On December 22, 2017, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 625,500 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $751,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at  a  price  of  $1.50 until  December  21,  2022.    Of  the  gross  proceeds  amount,  $232,000 was  allocated  to  the share purchase 
warrants  based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $519,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs 
totalling $156,000 were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($45,000) and the common shares ($111,000), 
respectively. 

43 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

On  April  30,  2018,  the  Company  completed  a  private  placement,  issuing  a  total  of  504,500  units  at  $1.20  per  unit  for  gross 
proceeds of approximately $605,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $1.50 until April 29, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $179,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $426,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling 
$129,000  were  proportionately  allocated  to  the  share  purchase  warrants  ($38,000)  and  the  common  shares  ($91,000), 
respectively. 

On June 7, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 784,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross proceeds 
of approximately $941,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price 
of $1.50 until June 6, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $277,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants based on fair 
value  and  the  residual  amount  of $664,000  was  allocated  to  the  common shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling  $173,000  were 
proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($51,000) and the common shares ($122,000), respectively. 

On July 9, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 833,500 units at $1.20 per unit for gross proceeds 
of approximately $1,000,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price 
of $1.50 until July 8, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $284,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants based on fair 
value  and  the  residual  amount  of $716,000  was  allocated  to  the  common shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling  $181,000  were 
proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($51,000) and the common shares ($130,000), respectively. 

On  August  8,  2018,  the  Company completed  a  private  placement,  issuing  a  total  of  682,000  units at  $1.20  per unit  for  gross 
proceeds of approximately $818,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $1.50 until August 7, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $212,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $606,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling 
$157,000  were  proportionately  allocated  to  the  share  purchase  warrants  ($41,000)  and  the  common  shares  ($116,000), 
respectively. 

On September 10, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 380,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $456,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at  a  price  of  $1.50  until  September  9,  2023.    Of  the  gross  proceeds  amount,  $128,000  was  allocated  to  the  share  purchase 
warrants  based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $328,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs 
totalling $111,000 were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($31,000) and the common shares ($80,000), 
respectively. 

On October 30, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 285,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $342,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $1.50 until October 29, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $61,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based on fair value and the residual amount of $281,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs totalling $95,000 
were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($17,000) and the common shares ($78,000), respectively. 

On December 6, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 726,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $871,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $1.50 until December 5, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $184,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $687,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling 
$150,000  were  proportionately  allocated  to  the  share  purchase  warrants  ($32,000)  and  the  common  shares  ($118,000), 
respectively. 

On December 20, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 285,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $342,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $1.50 until December 19, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $75,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based on fair value and the residual amount of $267,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs totalling $59,000 
were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($13,000) and the common shares ($46,000), respectively. 

On December 21, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 584,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $701,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at  a  price  of  $1.50 until  December  20,  2023.    Of  the  gross  proceeds  amount,  $153,300 was  allocated  to  the share purchase 
warrants  based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $547,500  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs 
totalling $121,000 were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($26,000) and the common shares ($95,000), 
respectively. 

On December 28, 2018, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 290,000 units at $1.20 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $348,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 

44 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

at a price of $1.50 until December 27, 2023.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $79,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based on fair value and the residual amount of $269,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs totalling $60,000 
were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($14,000) and the common shares ($46,000), respectively. 

On March 15, 2019, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 1,195,000 units at $0.51 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $610,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $0.72 until March 14, 2024.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $192,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based on fair value and the residual amount of $418,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs totalling $86,000 
were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($27,000) and the common shares ($59,000), respectively. 

On April 18, 2019, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 1,992,922  units at $0.51 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $1,016,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $0.72 until April 17, 2024.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $330,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based  on  fair  value  and  the  residual  amount  of  $686,000  was  allocated  to  the  common  shares.    Share  issue  costs  totalling 
$140,000  were  proportionately  allocated  to  the  share  purchase  warrants  ($45,000)  and  the  common  shares  ($95,000), 
respectively. 

On April 29, 2019, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 1,000,000  units at $0.51 per unit for gross 
proceeds of approximately $510,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share 
at a price of $0.72 until April 28, 2024.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $164,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants 
based on fair value and the residual amount of $346,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs totalling $73,000 
were proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($23,000) and the common shares ($50,000), respectively. 

On May 29, 2019, the Company completed a private placement, issuing a total of 996,000 units at $0.51 per unit for gross proceeds 
of approximately $508,000.  Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price 
of $0.72 until May 28, 2024.  Of the gross proceeds amount, $146,000 was allocated to the share purchase warrants based on 
fair value and the residual amount of $362,000 was allocated to the common shares.  Share issue costs totalling $60,000 were 
proportionately allocated to the share purchase warrants ($17,000) and the common shares ($43,000), respectively. 

The following table provides information on share purchase warrants outstanding as at:  

July 31, 2019 

July 31, 2018 

Weighted average 
remaining contractual 
life (in years) 

Number of share 
purchase warrants 
outstanding 

Weighted average 
remaining contractual  
life (in years) 

Number of share 
purchase warrants 
outstanding 

Exercise Price 

$  0.72 
$  1.50 
$  1.54 
$  1.61 
$  1.82 
$  1.92 
$  1.98 
$  2.24 

Outstanding, end of period 

4.72 
3.32 
2.75 
1.25 
1.99 
2.05 
1.70 
1.94 

5,183,922 
15,982,300 
8,680,000 
4,546,000 
1,250,000 
644,675 
3,105,000 
3,981,000 

43,372,897 

– 
4.08 
1.71 
0.25 
2.99 
3.05 
2.70 
0.94 

– 
12,750,300 
8,680,000 
4,668,000 
1,250,000 
644,675 
3,105,000 
3,981,000 

35,078,975 

On October 16, 2018, the Company announced to extend the exercise period of a total of 4,546,000 outstanding common share 
purchase warrants (the “Warrants”), all of which are held by arm’s length parties. The Warrants were issued pursuant to a private 
placement of the Company completed on November 1, 2013. The TSX approved the extension of the expiry date of the Warrants 
and as a result, each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at an exercise price of $1.61 at 
any time until October 31, 2020. The exercise price of $1.61 remains unchanged. 

At the Company’s Annual and Special Meeting of shareholders which was held on April 15, 2019, a total of 12,661,000 warrants 
were approved by a majority of votes cast by disinterested shareholders to extend the exercise period for an additional two years.  
All other terms and conditions remained the same.  The Warrants were originally issued pursuant to three private placements 
which were completed by the Company on July 10, 2014, April 1, 2015 and April 29, 2015. The TSX approved the extension of 
the expiry date of the Warrants and as a result, each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company 
at exercise prices of $1.54 and $2.24 with maturity dates ranging from July 9, 2021 through April 28,2022. 

Stock options 
The Company’s equity compensation plan reserves up to 10% of the Company’s outstanding common shares from time to time 
for  granting  to  directors,  officers  and  employees  of  the  Company  or  any  person  or  company  engaged  to  provide  ongoing 

45 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

management or consulting services.  Based on the Company’s current issued and outstanding common shares as at July 31, 
2019, options to purchase up to 11,122,550 common shares (2018 – 10,280,957) may be granted under the plan.  As at July 31, 
2019, options to purchase a total of 4,875,000 common shares (2018 – 930,000) were issued and outstanding under the equity 
compensation plan.  

The following table provides information on options outstanding and exercisable as at: 

July 31, 2019 

Exercise 
Price 
$0.51 
$0.92 
$1.34 
$1.50 
$1.65 
$2.00 

remaining contractual 

Weighted average  Number of 
options 
life (in years)  outstanding 
   4,625,000 
   – 
   – 
150,000 
50,000 
50,000 

4.72 
– 
– 
0.46 
0.26 
1.26 

Number of 
vested and 
exercisable 
options  
2,149,998 
– 
– 
150,000 
50,000 
50,000 

Weighted average 
remaining contractual  
life (in years) 
– 
1.86 
0.25 
1.46 
1.26 
2.26 

July 31, 2018 

Number of 
options 
outstanding 
  – 
   380,000 
   200,000 
200,000 
100,000 
50,000 

Number of 
vested and 
exercisable 
options 
– 
380,000 
200,000 
200,000 
100,000 
33,333 

Outstanding, end of year 

4.51 

4,875,000 

2,399,998 

1.37 

930,000 

913,333 

The following table summarized activity under the Company’s equity compensation plan for the fiscal years ended: 

July 31, 2019 

July 31, 2018 

Outstanding, beginning of year 
Granted 
Exercised 
Expired 

Outstanding, end of year  

Number 
   930,000 
4,625,000 
– 
680,000 

4,875,000 

Vested and exercisable, end of year   2,399,998 

Weighted average 
exercise price 
1.27 
0.51 
– 
1.14 

$ 

$ 

$ 

0.57 

0.57 

Number 
930,000 
– 
– 
– 

930,000 

913,333 

Weighted average 
exercise price 
1.27 
– 
– 
– 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1.27 

1.26 

The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. 

The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the 
following assumptions: 

Grant 
Date 

Number 
of options 
granted 

Volatility 
factor 

Risk free 
interest 
rate 

Dividend 
rate 

Expected 
life 

May 27, 2019 

4,625,000 

66.76% 

1.49% 

nil 

5 years 

Vesting 
period 

2 years 

Fair value 
of options 
granted 

$ 

666 

For fiscal 2019, 2,166,665 options vested (2018 – 16,666) with a fair value of $311,646 (2018 – $20,235). 

6.  Commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets  

The Company’s commitments are summarized as follows: 

V-DOS47 co-funded project 
Clinical research organizations 
Royalty and in-licensing 
Financial & investor relations 
Collaborative research organizations 
Facility leases 
Contract manufacturing organizations 

2020 
$  1,365 
452 
20 
131 
88 
66 
17 

2021 
$  2,382 
– 
20 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2022 
$  1,163 
– 
20 
– 
– 
– 
– 

$ 

2023 
356 
– 
20 
– 
– 
– 
– 

$ 

2024 
– 
– 
20 
– 
– 
– 
– 

2025 and 
beyond 
– 
$ 
– 
60 
– 
– 
– 
– 

$  2,139 

$  2,402 

$  1,183 

$ 

376 

$  20 

$ 

60 

Total 
$  5,266 
452 
160 
131 
88 
66 
17 

$  6,180 

46 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

Grant Funding Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Polish National Centre for Research and Development (“PNCRD”) 

Based on the Agreement, certain expenditures made commencing on March 1, 2016 are eligible for reimbursement. Total costs 
associated with the V-DOS47 development program under the Agreement is PLN19,794,416 ($6,756,000).  Of the total project 
costs, the PNCRD will reimburse the Company’s Polish subsidiary approximately 80% to 60% of eligible expenditures, depending 
on the stage of development plus a flat 17% for overhead costs, on the total government funded eligible portion of PLN12,506,956 
($4,269,000).  The Company’s subsidiary is required to spend PLN4,437,460 ($1,515,000) towards the project plus an additional 
PLN2,850,000 ($973,000) for manufacturing and clinical trial documentation costs, all of which, are not eligible for subsidies from 
the PNCRD.   Subsidized amounts may be drawn in advance or on a reimbursement basis, with varying criteria and timelines for 
justification  of  claims  being  made  by  the  Company’s  subsidiary.    Of  the  $5,266,000  in  total  future  commitments  towards  this 
program, the Company is projecting that a total of approximately $2,543,000 will be reimbursed by the PNCRD.  The Agreement 
may be terminated by either party upon one month’s written notice clearly spelling out the reasons for which the Agreement is 
being terminated.  In certain cases of termination, the Subsidiary may be obligated to return the received financial support in full 
within fourteen days of the day notice is served, with interest. As at July 31, 2019, the Company has received subsidies from the 
PNCRD of approximately $1,289,000.   (also see Note 11 – Government Grant).   

Clinical Research Organization (“CRO”) Commitments 

The Company has CRO supplier agreements in place for clinical research services related to the management of the Company’s 
clinical stage programs.  As at July 31, 2019, the Company accrued $581,000 (2018 – $873,000) for services provided by these 
CRO’s. 

Royalty and in-licensing commitments 

Pursuant  to  an  agreement  dated  April 28,  2005  with  the  National  Research  Council  of  Canada  (the  “NRC”),  the  Company  is 
required to pay a royalty to the NRC of 3% of net sales, with a minimum royalty of $10,000 per annum generated from the use of 
a certain antibody to target cancerous tissues of the lung.  In addition to the royalty payments, the Company is also required to 
make  certain  milestone  payments:    $25,000  upon  successful  completion  of  Phase  I  clinical  trials;  $50,000  upon  successful 
completion of Phase IIb clinical trials; $125,000 upon successful completion of Phase III clinical trials; and $200,000 upon receipt 
of market approval by regulatory authority.  L-DOS47 is subject to this agreement. 

Pursuant to an agreement dated September 22, 2016 with the National Research Council of Canada, the Company is required to 
pay a royalty to the NRC of 3% of net sales, with a minimum royalty of $10,000 per annum generated from the use of a certain 
antibody to target cancerous tissues of the lung.  In addition to the royalty payments, the Company is also required to make certain 
milestone payments for the first licensed product:  $25,000 upon successful completion of Phase I clinical trials; $50,000 upon 
successful completion of Phase IIb clinical trials; $150,000 upon successful completion of Phase III clinical trials; $200,000 upon 
receipt  of first  regulatory approval by a  regulatory authority;  and  $200,000 upon  receipt of  a  second  regulatory approval  by  a 
regulatory authority.  For the development of each subsequent licensed product: $200,000 upon receipt of first regulatory approval 
by a regulatory authority; and $200,000 upon receipt of a second regulatory approval by a regulatory authority.  As it relates to 
sub-licensing arrangements, the Company is required to pay the NRC 33% of any sub-licensing revenues received.  The anti-
CEACAM6 single domain antibody 2A3 is subject to this agreement.  As at July 31, 2019 the Company has $nil (2018 – $nil) in 
financial obligations outstanding related to royalty and in-licensing commitments. 

Financial and investor relations agreements 

The  Company  has  agreements  with  both  ACM  Alpha  Consulting  Management  EST  (“ACMest”)  and  ACM  Alpha  Consulting 
Management AG (“ACMag”).  The agreements are both effective July 2, 2018 and can be terminated upon ninety days notice.  
Mr. Kandziora is President of ACMest and acted as Observer on the Board of Directors of the Company up until August 22, 2019 
in addition to also being on the Supervisory Board of the Company’s wholly owned Polish subsidiary, Helix Immuno-Oncology 
S.A.  Mrs. Kandziora is President of ACMest and was Corporate Secretary up until August 22, 2019. 

The agreement with ACMest includes the following provision: 

a)  a monthly fee for investor relations services of CHF33,000 and reimbursement of certain expenses. 

The agreement with ACMag includes the following provision: 

a)  a 12.5% fee on the gross proceeds on any capital raised up to six months after the termination of this agreement from 

an ACMest introduced investor with residency outside Canada and the U.S.; 

47 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

At July 31, 2019, the Company accrued $353,000 and $713,000 for services provided by ACMest and ACMag, respectively 
(2018 – $410,000 and $125,000, respectively).  Also see Note 9 – Related Party Transactions. 

Collaborative Research Organization Service Commitments 

The Company has collaborative research agreements relating to its L-DOS47 and CAR-T programs.  The nature of the services 
includes assay development, animal studies and imaging and ongoing future clinical sample analysis.  As at July 31, 2019, the 
Company accrued $118,000 (2018 – $62,000) for collaborative research organizations services it had received. 

Operating lease commitments 

The Company is committed to pay $66,000 under three facility lease agreements with lease terms up to 12 months. 

Contract Manufacturing Organization (“CMO”) commitments 

The Company has CMO supplier agreements related to the Company’s L-DOS47 program, all of which are inter-dependant with 
manufacturing of L-DOS47.  As at July 31, 2019, the Company accrued $5,000 (2018 – $65,000) for CMO services and has not 
committed to any additional services. 

Non-disclosure agreement (“NDA”) 

The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary signed two separate non-disclosure agreements which included specific wording 
as to the use of data for purposes other than those specified or in the event of disclosure to a third party of all or a part of certain 
data.  Under the NDA, and the event of a breach, the Company would be liable for a contractual penalty of PLN500,000 for each 
case of breach under each of the NDA’s. 

Legal proceedings and claims 

There are two old claims made against the Company in the normal course of operations that remain pending at the end of fiscal 
2019.  Management believes that these claims are without merit.  These actions are not sufficiently advanced for the outcome to 
be presently determinable and, accordingly, no provision for these claims have been made in these financial statements. 

7.  Capital risk management 

The Company’s main objectives when managing capital are to ensure sufficient liquidity to finance research and development 
activities, clinical trials, ongoing administrative costs, working capital and capital expenditures.  The Company includes cash in 
the definition of capital.  The Company endeavours not to unnecessarily dilute shareholders when managing the liquidity of its 
capital structure. 

Since inception, the Company has financed its operations from public and private sales of equity, the exercise of warrants and 
stock options, and, to a lesser extent, from interest income from funds available for investment, government grants and investment 
tax credits.  Since the Company does not have net earnings from its operations, the Company’s long-term liquidity depends on its 
ability  to  access  capital  markets,  which  depends  substantially  on  the  success  of  the  Company’s  ongoing  research  and 
development programs, as well as capital market conditions and availability. 

The Company does not currently have enough cash reserves to fully fund its clinical trials nor does the Company have sufficient 
cash reserves to meet anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures through at least the next twelve months. 

The Company does not have any credit facilities and is therefore not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements or 
covenants. 

8.  Financial instruments and risk management 

The Company has classified its financial instruments as follows: 

Cash 

2019 

2018 

Fair Value 
206 

$ 

Fair value 
hierarchy 
Level 1 

  Fair Value 
366 

$ 

Fair value 
hierarchy 
Level 1 

Fair value hierarchy 
Financial  instruments  recorded  at  fair  value  on  the  balance  sheet  are  classified  using  a  fair  value  hierarchy  that  reflects  the 
significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.  The fair value hierarchy has the following levels: 

48 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

a.  Level 1 reflects valuation based on quoted prices observed in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; 
b.  Level 2 reflects valuation techniques based on inputs that are quoted prices of similar instruments in active markets; 
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices used in a 
valuation model that are observable for that instrument; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by 
observable market data by correlation or other means; and 

c.  Level 3 reflects valuation techniques with significant unobservable market inputs. 

A financial instrument is classified to the lowest level of the hierarchy for which a significant input has been considered in measuring 
fair value. 

The financial instrument in the Company’s financial statements, measured at fair value, is cash. 

Fair value 
The fair value of financial instruments as at July 31, 2019 and 2018 approximates their carrying value because of the near-term 
maturity of these instruments. 

Financial risk management 
The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks by virtue of its activities: market risk (including currency and interest rate 
risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.  The overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and 
seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on financial performance. 

Risk management (the identification and evaluation of financial risk) is carried out by the finance department, in close cooperation 
with management.  The finance department is charged with the responsibility of establishing controls and procedures to ensure 
that financial risks are mitigated in accordance with the approved policies.  The Company’s Board of Directors has the overall 
responsibility for the oversight of these risks and reviews the Company’s policies on an ongoing basis to ensure that these risks 
are appropriately managed. 

Market risk 
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates, will affect the Company’s 
income or the value of its financial instruments. 

Currency risk 
The Company has international transactions and is exposed to foreign exchange risks from various currencies, primarily the Euro 
and U.S. dollar.  Foreign exchange risks arise from the foreign currency translation of the Company’s integrated foreign operation 
in  Poland.    In  addition,  foreign  exchange  risks  arise  from  purchase  transactions,  as  well  as  recognized  financial  assets  and 
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. 

Balances in foreign currencies at July 31, are as follows: 

Cash 
Accounts receivable 
Accounts payable 
Accruals 

Net foreign currencies 

EUR 

– 
– 
(401) 
(25) 

(426) 

2019 

USD 

–  
–  
(563) 
–  

(563) 

PLN 

330 
143 
(232) 
(107) 

(134) 

EUR 

33 
– 
(412) 
– 

(379) 

2018 

USD 

– 
– 
(334) 
(63) 

(397) 

PLN 

241 
126 
(299) 
(69) 

(1) 

Closing exchange rate 
Impact of 1% change in exchange rate 

1.4627 
+/- 6 

1.3148 
+/- 7 

0.3413 
+/- 0 

1.5239 
+/- 6 

1.3017 
+/- 5 

0.3568 
+/- 0 

Any fluctuation in the exchange rates of the foreign currencies listed above could have an impact on the Company’s results from 
operations; however, they would not impair or enhance the ability of the Company to pay its foreign-denominated expenses. 

Interest rate risk 
Interest rate risk is the risk that future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in interest rates, which 
are affected by market conditions.  The Company is exposed to interest rate risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates received 
on its cash and cash equivalents.  The Company does not have any credit facilities and is therefore not subject to any debt related 
interest rate risk. 

49 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

The Company manages its interest rate risk by maximizing the interest income earned on excess funds while maintaining the 
liquidity necessary to conduct its operations on a day-to-day basis.  Any investment of excess funds is limited to risk-free financial 
instruments.  Fluctuations in the market rates of interest do not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations 
due to the relatively short-term maturity of any investments held by the Company at any given point in time and the low global 
interest rate environment.  The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to interest rate risk. 

Credit risk 
Credit risk is the risk of a financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its 
contractual obligation. 

The table below breaks down the various categories that make up the Company’s accounts receivable balances as at July 31: 

Government related – HST/VAT 
Research and development investment tax credits 
Other 

$ 

2019 
82 
121 
     87 
$  290 

$ 

2018 
73 
233 
9 
$  315 

Liquidity risk 
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations as they come due.  Since inception, the Company 
has mainly relied on financing its operations from public and private sales of equity.  The Company does not have any credit 
facilities and is therefore not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements or covenants. 

The Company manages its liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecasts and actual cash flow from operations and anticipated 
investing and financing activities. 

The Company’s cash reserves of $206,000 as at July 31, 2019 are insufficient to meet anticipated cash needs for working capital 
and capital expenditures through the next twelve months, nor are they sufficient to see the current research and development 
initiates  through  to completion.    To  the  extent  that  the  Company does  not  believe it  has sufficient  liquidity  to  meet  its current 
obligations, management considers securing additional funds primarily through equity arrangements to be of utmost importance. 

The Company’s long-term liquidity depends on its ability to access the capital markets, which depends substantially on the success 
of the Company’s ongoing research and development programs, as well as economic conditions relating to the state of the capital 
markets  generally.    Accessing  the  capital  markets  is  particularly  challenging  for  companies  that  operate  in  the  biotechnology 
industry. 

The following are the contractual maturities of the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities as at July 31: 
2018 

2019 

Accounts payable 
Accrued liabilities 

Carrying 
amount 
$  3,040 
1,057 

Less than  Greater than 
one-year 
one year 
– 
$ 
$  3,040 
  – 
1,057 

Carrying 
amount 
$  1,992 
644 

Less than  Greater than 
one-year 
one year 
– 
$ 
$  1,992 
– 
644 

This table only covers liabilities and obligations relative to financial instruments and does not anticipate any income associated 
with assets. 

9.  Related party transactions 

The following table summarizes key management personnel compensation for the fiscal years ended: 

Compensation 
Stock-based compensation 

$ 

   2019 
767 
291 
$  1,058 

2018 
695 
– 
695 

$ 

 $ 

An amount of $225,000 was advanced to the Company by an officer.  The advance is interest bearing at 4% per annum and is 
repayable, on demand, no later than August 30, 2019.  The principle amount along with interest, was repaid, as per terms.  The 
advance is included in accruals as at July 31, 2019. 

50 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

The following table summarizes non-management directors’ compensation for the fiscal years ended: 

Directors’ fees 
Stock-based compensation 

2019 
162 
24 

186 

$ 

$ 

The following table summarizes the total compensation for both ACMest and ACMag for the fiscal years ended: 

Finder’s fee commissions 
Financial and investor relations consulting fee 

$ 

2019 
940 
571 
$  1,511 

2018 
212 
– 

212 

$ 

$ 

2018 
$  1,065 
516 
$  1,581 

The  Company  has  agreements  with  both  ACM  Alpha  Consulting  Management  EST  (“ACMest”)  and  ACM  Alpha  Consulting 
Management AG (“ACMag”).  The agreements are both effective July 2, 2018 and can be terminated upon ninety days notice.  
Mr. Kandziora is President of ACMest and acted as Observer on the Board of Directors of the Company up until August 22, 2019 
in addition to also being on the Supervisory Board of the Company’s wholly owned Polish subsidiary, Helix Immuno-Oncology 
S.A.    Mrs.  Kandziora  is  President  of  ACMest  and  was  Corporate  Secretary  up  until  August  22,  2019.  (also  see  Note  6  – 
Commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets). 

Related party transactions are at arm’s length and recorded at the amount agreed to by the related parties. 

10.  Research and development projects  

As at July 31, 2019, the Company has incurred research and development expenditures primarily on the L-DOS47 research and 
development program. 

Included  in  research  and  development  expenditures  are  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  various  research  and  development 
functions  and  initiatives  the  Company  has  underway  and  include:  salaries;  bonuses;  benefits;  stock-based  compensation; 
depreciation of property, plant and equipment; patent costs; consulting services; third party contract manufacturing, third party 
clinical research organization services; and all overhead costs associated with the Company’s research facilities. 

The following table outlines research and development costs expensed and investment tax credits for the Company’s significant 
research and development projects for the fiscal years ended July 31: 

L-DOS47 
V-DOS47 
CAR-T 
Corporate research and development expenses 
Trademark and patent related expenses 
Stock-based compensation expense 
Depreciation expense 
Research and development investment tax credits 
Polish government grant subsidy (V-DOS47) 

11.  Government grant 

$ 

2019 
3,530 
478 
333 
528 
435 
198 
109 
(126) 
(479) 
$  5,006 

2018 
$  4,893 
457 
318 
432 
440 
10 
141 
(132) 
(475) 
$  6,084 

On July 21, 2016, the Company announced that a grant funding agreement was entered into by the Company’s wholly owned 
subsidiary in Poland and the PNCRD, whereby certain expenditures made commencing on March 1, 2016.  Subsidized amounts 
may be drawn in advance or on a reimbursement basis, with varying criteria and timelines for justification of claims being made 
by the Company’s subsidiary.  The Agreement may be terminated by either party upon one month’s written notice and must also 
state the grounds for which the Agreement is being terminated.  In certain cases of termination, the Company’s Polish subsidiary 
may be obligated to return the received financial support in full within fourteen days of the day notice is served, with interest (also 
see Note 6 – Commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets). 

51 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

12.  Operating, General and Administration 

The following table outlines operating, general and administration costs expensed a for the following periods:  

Wages and benefits 
Director fees 
Third-party advisors 
Other general and administrative 
Stock-based compensation expense 
Depreciation expense 

13.  Income taxes 

$ 

2019 
759 
162 
1,068  
316 
164 
17 
$  2,486 

2018 
665 
214 
1,089 
468 
– 
26 
2,462 

$ 

$ 

The  Company  recognizes  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  for  expected  future  tax  consequences  of  temporary  differences 
between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and certain carry-forward balances.  The Company’s 
effective income tax rate in fiscal 2019 is 25.8% (2018 – 26.7%). 

The tax effects of temporary differences for the Company that gives rise to the unrecorded deferred tax asset presented in the 
following table: 

Deferred tax assets: 

Scientific Research & Experimental Development expenditure pool 
Non-capital losses and other credits carried forward 
Capital losses carried forward 
Excess of tax basis over book basis of capital assets 
Deductible share issue costs 

2019 

2018 

$  12,716 
23,012 
156  
1,757 
629 
$  38,270 

$  12,851 
22,267 
161 
1,686 
634 
$  37,599 

Current income tax loss and non-capital tax loss carry forwards 
As at July 31, 2019, the Company has Canadian tax losses that can be carried forward of approximately $89,182,000 (2018 – 
$83,418,000) and are available until 2039 as follows: 

2025 
2026 
2027 
2028 
2029 
2030 
2031 
2032 
2033 
2034 
2035 
2036 
2037 
2038 
2039 

$ 

862 
2,113 
2,904 
2,438 
9,188 
6,552 
6,792 
13,242 
2,437 
6,727 
7,256 
7,883 
7,884 
7,152 
5,752 
$  89,182 

Scientific Research & Experimental Development expenditures (“SR&ED”) 
Under the Income Tax Act (Canada), certain expenditures are classified as SR&ED expenditures and are grouped into a pool for 
tax purposes.  This expenditure pool can be carried forward indefinitely and deducted in full in any subsequent year.  The SR&ED 
expenditure pool at July 31, 2019 is approximately $49,280,000 (2018 – $48,144,000). 

Investment tax credits 
The  Company  has  also  earned  investment  tax  credits  in  Canada,  on  eligible  SR&ED  expenditures  at  July  31,  2019  of 
approximately $11,681,000 (2018 – $11,514,000), which can offset Canadian income taxes otherwise payable in future years up 
to 2039.  Investment tax credits are accounted for as a reduction of the related expenditure for items of a current nature and a 

52 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018 
 (Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars) 

reduction of the related asset cost for items of a capital nature, provided that the Company has reasonable assurance that the tax 
credits will be realized.  During the year, the Company received cash refundable investment tax credits related to prior years in 
the amount of $238,000 (2018 – $332,000).  At July 31, 2019, cash refundable investment tax credits total $121,000 (2018 – 
$234,000).  The research and development investment tax credits recorded are based on management’s estimates of amounts 
expected to be recovered and are subject to audit by the taxation authorities and, accordingly, these amounts may vary.  Federal 
investment tax credits are non-refundable to the Company.  Refundable investment tax credits reflect eligible SR&ED expenditures 
incurred in Ontario, Alberta and Quebec. 

Tax - Poland 
As at July 31, 2019, the Company has Poland tax losses that can be carried forward of approximately PLN3,231,000 (2018 – 
PLN1,516,000) and are available until 2022 as follows: 

2020 
2021 
2022 
2023 
2024 

14.  Subsequent Event 

        37 
        212 
871 
1,000 
1,111 
3,231 

$ 

On  August  21,  2019,  the  Company  completed  a  private  placement  financing  of  13,725,500  units  of  the  Company  and  the 
disposition of a 25% stake of its wholly owned Polish subsidiary for $7,000,005. Each unit comprises one common share and one 
common share purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one common share at 
an exercise price of $0.72 and will have an expiry of five years from the date of issuance. 

53 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES / COMMENTS 

54 
 
 
 
NOTES / COMMENTS 

55 
 
 
 
NOTES / COMMENTS 

56 
 
 
 
Corporate  Information 

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

TRANSFER AGENT 

Computershare 
100 University Avenue 
8th Floor, North Tower Toronto 
Ontario, Canada, M5J 2Y1 
Tel: (800) 564-6253 

EXCHANGE  SYMBOLS 

TSX: HBP 

Slawomir Majewski, M.D. 
Chairman 

Artur Gabor 
Director 

Ireneusz Fafara 
Director 

Heman Chao, Ph.D. 
Director 
Chief Executive & Scientific Officer 

Photios (Frank) Michalargias, CPA, CA 
Chief Financial Officer 

SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD 

Robert J. Gillies, Ph.D 

Kazimierz Roszkowski-Sliz, M.D., Ph.D. 

Heman Chao, Ph.D. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9120 Leslie Street, Suite 205 
Richmond Hill, Ontario 
Canada, L4B 3J9 

Tel:  (905) 841-2300 
Fax: (905) 841-2244 
Email: ir@helixbiopharma.com