Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________________________
FORM 10-K
_______________________________
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 001-38046
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
225 20th Street, Rock Island, Illinois
(Address of principal executive offices)
ICC Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_______________________________
(309) 793-1700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
_______________________________
81-3359409
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
61201
(Zip Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Trading Symbol(s)
ICCH
Name of each exchange on which registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:0) No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:0) No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No (cid:0)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No (cid:0)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company x
Emerging growth company x
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2021, based upon the closing sale price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2021 as reported on
the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC, was $34,813,105. Shares of Common Stock held directly or indirectly by each reporting officer and director along with shares held by the Company ESOP
have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 10, 2022 was 3,295,356.
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which is to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, to the extent described in Part III.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 3A.
Item 4.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III
Items 10-14.
PART IV
Item 15.
Signatures
Exhibit Index
Table of Contents
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Forward-Looking Information
Mine Safety Disclosures
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
~ 2 ~
Page
3
23
35
35
35
36
37
38
40
41
58
60
97
97
97
98
99
100
101
Table of Contents
Item 1. Business
Overview
ICC Holdings, Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporation that was organized in 2016. As used in this Form 10-K, references to the “Company,” “we,” “us,”
and “our” refer to the consolidated group. On a stand-alone basis ICC Holdings, Inc. is referred to as the “Parent Company.” The consolidated group
consists of the holding company, ICC Holdings, Inc.; ICC Realty, LLC, a real estate services and holding company; Beverage Insurance Agency, Inc., dba
Beverage Insurance Specialty, a non-insurance subsidiary; Estrella Innovative Solutions, Inc., an outsourcing company; Southern Hospitality Education,
LLC, dba Katkin, a full-service food safety and education company, and Illinois Casualty Company (ICC), an operating insurance company. ICC is an
Illinois domiciled company.
We are a specialty insurance carrier primarily underwriting commercial multi-peril, liquor liability, workers’ compensation, and umbrella liability
coverages for the food and beverage industry through our subsidiary insurance company, ICC. ICC writes business in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin and markets through independent agents. Approximately 24.0% and
25.0% of the premium was written in Illinois for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The Company operates as a
single segment.
We primarily market our products through a network of 186 independent agents in the states that we write in. ICC has been assigned, as of June 22,
2021, an “A-” (Excellent) financial strength rating by A.M. Best Company, Inc. (A.M. Best), which is the fourth highest out of fifteen possible ratings.
ICC’s upcoming evaluation by A.M. Best is occurring on April 28, 2022 and therefore the ratings from this evaluation will not be available at the time of
this report. ICC’s prior evaluation with A.M. Best occurred on April 28, 2021, when A.M. Best upgraded its Financial Strength Rating (FSR) to “A-“ from
“B++” and the Issuer Credit Rating (ICR) to “a-“ (Excellent) from “bbb+” (Good). At that time, the outlook of the FSR as well as the Long-Term ICR is
stable. A.M. Best also upgraded the Long-Term ICR of ICC Holdings, Inc. to “bbb-“ (Good) from “bb+” (Good). The outlook assigned, as of June 22,
2021, to the credit rating of the Company is stable.
Since inception, ICC has specialized in providing customized insurance products and aggressive claims defense for customers exclusively in the food
and beverage industry.
ICC was founded as an inter-insurance exchange in 1950 based upon the recognition that establishments serving alcohol require unique insurance
protection. Beginning in 1998, we expanded the scope of our product offerings beyond liquor liability to include property, general liability, and umbrella.
Workers’ compensation coverage was added in 2007. Our goal is to meet the full range of business insurance needs of our clients in the food and beverage
industry.
In 1999, ICC recognized the significant need to automate. Upon determining available commercial software was inadequate to meet our long-term
vision, we contracted the development of an integrated platform to handle agency, policy, and vendor management. Introduced in 2001, the first module
successfully improved productivity and reporting capabilities. We built on that success by adding document imaging, claims, billing, and risk management
modules. As it has grown, our information management system has provided us with a unique and comprehensive ability to automate processes, track and
examine risk traits, and monitor claims development. As a result, ICC has constructed and leveraged a multi-variant pricing algorithm that allows us to
better analyze our business in order to more effectively price to actual exposure.
ICC mutualized in 2004 and began to expand its territory geographically within the Midwest. We are an admitted carrier in 15 states: Arizona,
Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah and Wisconsin. As we expand our
territory and product lines, we maintain our focus and commitment to the food and beverage industry. As a result, we have developed an expertise in our
niche, particularly within the areas of underwriting, loss control, and claims management. ICC continues to leverage that experience into the ongoing
development of innovative insurance products and services uniquely tailored to the food and beverage industry.
ICC is subject to examination and comprehensive regulation by the Illinois Department of Insurance. See Item 1. Business — Regulation.
Our executive offices are located at 225 20th Street, Rock Island, Illinois 61201, and our phone number is (309) 793-1700. Our corporate website
address is http://IR.ICCHoldingsInc.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and
such information should not be considered to be part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
~ 3 ~
Table of Contents
Our Business Strategies
We believe that our mission is to deliver expertly crafted insurance products and services for the food and beverage industry. Accordingly, we believe
that this focus positions us to write profitable business in both hard insurance markets (where industry capital is constricted, competition is low, and
premium rates are rising) and soft insurance markets (where industry capital is rising, competition is high and premium rates are falling). As part of our
business process, we have developed our business strategy and focus using the following guiding principles to reflect the essence of who we aspire to be:
(cid:0) we exist to return value to our stakeholders in the form of strong financial performance and sustained surplus growth;
(cid:0) we conduct our business with the highest ethics and unquestionable integrity;
(cid:0) we recognize and reward the commitment of all associates who make ICC a success, by challenging them, valuing them, and recognizing their
contribution, while cultivating a mutually supporting culture;
(cid:0) we are committed to the independent agency system and our mutual drive to deliver the highest quality products at competitive prices;
(cid:0)
customer service—understanding and meeting the needs and expectations of our policyholder and agents—is at the fundamental core of our
existence;
(cid:0) we thrive in the marketplace by pursuing a unique understanding of the niche, offering customized products, and aggressively defending our
insureds;
(cid:0) we identify worthy causes to support with our company and associate resources. We promote good corporate citizenship; and
(cid:0)
innovation drives our efficiency, quality, and effectiveness. We proactively improve our products and processes by intelligent investment in talent
and technology that meets the exacting needs of our customer.
In order to effectuate our mission and guiding principles, we have identified the following core strategies to achieve our long-term success:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
design and market commercial property and casualty products customized for the food and beverage industry;
pursue deliberate geographic expansion;
foster partnerships with independent agents who focus on the food and beverage industry and appreciate the Company’s commitment and
expertise;
leverage data and technology to maximize operational efficiency, maintain sustainable pricing and drive continuous innovation;
implement an investment strategy that maximizes return within acceptable risk tolerances;
promote a culture of excellence that encourages teamwork and contributes to talent attraction, development, and retention; and
(cid:0) maintain a robust and comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management program, focused on upside optimization and downside mitigation.
Competitive Growth Strategies
Technology – We believe that existing and developing technology and information systems are impacting and will continue to impact the insurance
industry’s use of risk analysis in the underwriting process, providing tools for reduction of claims, and modernizing the claims handling process. As part of
our focus, we have internally developed a completely integrated policy management system. This system allows us to leverage loss control data for
predictive analytics in both the claims and underwriting areas. For example, in the underwriting area, we create pricing models taking into account the
unique characteristics of our customers, with industry-specific variables such as latest hour of close, type and frequency of on-site entertainment, and
average alcoholic beverage pricing. We also have achieved better efficiency by moving to a more paperless organization and have integrated off-site
employees in our claims, underwriting, accounting, loss control and IT development areas. We intend to remain a leader in the industry in utilizing
technology and data analysis to price our coverage based on the risk assumed, reduce accidents and provide prompt claims response.
~ 4 ~
Table of Contents
Industry Expertise – We have provided the food and beverage industry insurance products and services since 1950. By leveraging our experience, we
better understand our customers and their needs, which allows us to better price our products and services and defend claims aggressively and economically
using the experience of our in-house legal department and an established network of specialized defense attorneys. As a result, we are the exclusively
endorsed property and liability insurance provider for the Arizona Licensed Beverage Association, the Colorado Licensed Beverage Association, the
Indiana Restaurant and Lodging Association, the Illinois Licensed Beverage Association, the Michigan Licensed Beverage Association, the Minnesota
Licensed Beverage Association, the Ohio Licensed Beverage Association, the Pennsylvania Licensed Beverage Association, and the Tavern League of
Colorado. We also provide insurance agents with continuing education on industry topics, such as liquor liability, kitchen fire prevention, and alcohol
server training. For policyholders serving liquor, we provide certified alcohol server training as a value-added service and risk elimination/mitigation tool.
Our employees are also regular panel speakers at local and national claims conferences.
Enterprise Risk Management – As part of our effort to grow responsibly, we have put in place a cross-functional, multi-dimensional enterprise risk
management program. The program is focused on financial, organization, operational, tactical, market and legal risks and is managed at two different
levels: the enterprise risk committee of our board of directors and our internal enterprise risk management committee. The focus of the enterprise risk
committee of our board of directors is on oversight, top tier risk, emerging risks, and risk optimization. The internal enterprise risk committee is comprised
of our executive team, along with our actuarial manager, which is focused on conducting a review of all risks attendant to the Company at least annually;
rating triaged risks for severity, frequency, and control; completing risk control reports for stress testing, risk tolerance, and mitigation plans; measuring and
monitoring risk on an ongoing basis; and tying enterprise risk management to individual performance evaluations and compensation. Annually the
Company, working with its reinsurance broker, completes an economic capital model for the insurance operations of ICC.
Growth Strategies
While we have established a significant market share in our existing territories, we believe that there is still opportunity for growth within our existing
footprint. We will continue to seek out insurance agency partners who have a commitment to our niche and an ability to sell the value represented by our
products. Our long-term growth plan also involves expanding geographically into states where we believe current insurance laws provide an attractive
market within our niche for our existing products and services. We will consider geographic expansion opportunities that allow us to leverage existing
agency relationships whose footprints overlap our own. Growth opportunities will always be carefully evaluated with long term profitability at the forefront
of the decision making process.
Although we do not have any current plans or intent to expand or grow our business by acquisition, we will consider opportunities that are presented to
us.
Reaction to Market Cycles
Many insurance companies sporadically target businesses within our niche; however, a relatively small number make a long-term commitment to the
niche through changing insurance market cycles. When the insurance market is “hard” and premium growth is achievable in less specialized segments,
many carriers exit this niche. Large and diversified insurance carriers have the ability to shift their focus and resources to less challenging areas. When
market conditions “soften,” those same carriers often aggressively move back into our niche for premium growth. Because we specialize in the niche, we
do not shift resources to other market segments. Therefore, the Company generally maintains pricing stability throughout market cycles by relying on our
strong loss control, underwriting and claims expertise, and our customer service commitment. We react to market cycles by adjusting our appetite for risks
based on pricing and cycle conditions, but we maintain a consistent commitment to the food and beverage industry. Due to the relatively small number of
insurance companies that make a long-term commitment to this niche, the insurance market does not fluctuate to the same extent as the insurance market
for the general commercial market.
~ 5 ~
Table of Contents
Our Challenges
Our business faces significant challenges that can impede our goal of growing our business while realizing operating profits, including the following:
Estimating Our Loss Reserves.
We maintain loss reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability for unpaid losses and settlement expenses for reported and unreported claims
incurred as of the end of each accounting period. These reserves represent management’s estimates of what the ultimate settlement and administration of
claims will cost. Pursuant to applicable insurance regulations, these reserves are reviewed by an independent actuary on at least an annual basis. Setting
reserves is inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance that current or future reserves will prove adequate. If our loss reserves are inadequate, it will
have an unfavorable impact on our results. See Item 1. Business — Losses and Settlement Expense for a summary of the favorable and unfavorable
developments in our loss reserves in the previous 10-year period.
Reliance on Independent Agents.
Our product is distributed through a contracted network of independent insurance agents. Independent agents are typically contracted with a number of
insurance carriers. The producers within an agency will determine which product is most appropriate to recommend to their client or prospective client. The
agency will select a product based on a variety of factors such as: premium; coverage; service including billing and claims; agency compensation and
agency/company relationship. Establishing and maintaining long term financially successful agency relationships is very important to the long term success
of a company.
Maintaining Our Financial Strength Ratings.
In June 2021, A.M. Best upgraded ICC’s financial strength rating to “A-“ from “B++” stable outlook. A key to achieving our goal of significant
growth in our premiums written is maintaining an A.M. Best rating of “A-” or better. Increasing our capitalization and maintaining strong operating
performance are significant rating components reviewed by A.M. Best. This is combined with a review of various other rating requirements. If we are not
able to increase our rating or if A.M. Best downgrades our rating, it is likely that we will not be able to compete as effectively and our ability to sell
insurance policies could decline. As a result, our financial results would be adversely affected. A.M. Best reviews our rating approximately once per year.
Attracting, Developing and Retaining Experienced Personnel.
To sustain our growth as a property and casualty insurance company operating in a specialty niche market, we must continue to attract, develop and
retain management, marketing, distribution, underwriting, customer service, and claims personnel with expertise in the products we offer. The loss of key
personnel, or our inability to recruit, develop and retain additional qualified personnel, could materially and adversely affect our business, growth and
profitability.
Competitive Strengths
Our opportunity for growth is driven by our competitive strengths, which include the following:
Use of Data and Metrics to Improve our Underwriting Results.
Our analysis of data available through both governmental and other industry resources, combined with our internal data, drive our underwriting and
pricing decisions. We have developed a multi-variant risk grading system and pricing algorithm that combines both objective and subjective inputs that
drive both whether to provide coverage and pricing. This information helps us avoid providing coverage to higher risk insureds while improving our overall
risk profile. Most risks we insure are inspected within the first 60 days of policy binding, which permits us to cancel the policy if we determine that the
insured is not an acceptable risk or pricing is inadequate. Each inspection consists of an extensive risk profile questionnaire as well as 25 to 100 pictures of
the insured’s place of business. We believe this approach reduces claims frequency.
~ 6 ~
Table of Contents
Focus on niche food and beverage business.
We target niche markets within the food and beverage industry that support adequate pricing and believe we are able to adapt to changing market needs
ahead of our competitors through our strategic focus. We develop and deliver specialty insurance products priced to meet our customers’ needs and strive to
generate consistent underwriting profit. We believe that our extensive experience and expertise specific to underwriting and claims management in the food
and beverage industry will allow continued loss ratio improvement going forward. The Company is committed to retaining this underwriting and claim
handling expertise as a core competency as the volume of business increases.
Strong market presence with name recognition and long-standing producer relationships.
We have been writing insurance for the food and beverage industry in Illinois since 1950. Approximately 24.0% of current direct premium was
generated in Illinois for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Great care is taken in building the ICC brand in all states of operation and the Company holds significant market share in nearly all states serviced.
ICC acknowledges that each state, each agency and each customer is unique. A commitment to quality of product and services is universally important and
recognized.
Scalable operations positioned for growth.
We are focused on automation and operating efficiencies across our core functional areas. We have consistently increased premium per full time
equivalent employee for five consecutive years with the exception of 2020 during which we experienced a decrease in written premium per full time
equivalent employee due to the disproportionate negative impact COVID-19 had on the Company’s market niche. We believe we are well-positioned in
both terms of personnel and systems to increase written premiums and to expand into new geographic markets with better than industry level profitability
using the efficient operating infrastructure we have developed.
Experienced management team.
We are managed by an experienced group of executives led by Arron K. Sutherland, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sutherland has
served in his current position since June 2010, joined ICC in 2006 and has worked in the insurance industry for over 25 years. Michael R. Smith, our Vice
President – Chief Financial Officer, has served with ICC since 2011. Mr. Smith has more than 25 years of experience in the insurance industry. Howard J.
Beck, our Vice President – Chief Underwriting Officer, has been with ICC since 2004 and has over 33 years of insurance experience and 26 years of
property and casualty underwriting experience. Norman D. Schmeichel, our Vice President – Chief Information Officer, has served with ICC since 2002.
Mr. Schmeichel has more than 25 years’ experience in information technologies and 18 years’ experience in the insurance industry. Additionally, Julia B.
Suiter, our Chief Legal Officer, has served with ICC since 2009 and has over 25 years’ experience in insurance defense and contract law. Kathleen S.
Springer, our Chief Human Resources Officer, has served with ICC since 2008 and has over 25 years’ experience in benefits, compensation, and talent
acquisition and more than 12 years’ experience in the insurance industry. As a group, our executive officers have on average more than 23 years’
experience in the property and casualty insurance industry.
Products
ICC has specialized in the food and beverage industry since 1950. Our product language is based on Insurance Services Offices (ISO) forms, which is
an industry standard, but tailored to the specific needs of our clients. We began by writing liquor liability or dram shop insurance and that remains a
prominent line of business today. Commercial property and liability are written in a single policy as a business owners policy (BOP). ICC also writes
workers’ compensation and commercial umbrella policies which are written as complementary lines to the BOP and liquor liability and are not offered on a
stand-alone basis. As of December 31, 2021, ICC had 6,088 BOP policies, 6,667 liquor liability policies, 1,959 workers’ compensation policies and 1,696
commercial umbrella policies. 91.2% of BOP policies and 96.4% of liquor liability policies are for either restaurants or taverns. While we do not currently
write commercial auto insurance, we do insure risks associated with the delivery of food or beverage.
Marketing and Distribution
Our commercial insurance product is sold by over 186 independent insurance agents, also referred to as producers. These agencies access multiple
insurance companies and are typically established businesses in the communities in which they operate. We view these agents as our primary customers
because they are in a position to recommend either our insurance products or those of a competitor to their customers. We consider our relationships with
these agencies to be a core strength of the Company.
~ 7 ~
Table of Contents
We manage our producers through quarterly business reviews utilizing various internally generated reports. Our quantitative agency review (QAR)
measures each agency on a variety of weighted metrics and ranks them from high to low. The measurement is updated on a weekly basis and is available
for all company employees’ review.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, one of our producers was responsible for more than 5% of our direct premiums written and our top 10
producers accounted for approximately 39.9% of direct premiums written.
Our agency partners are supported by our Marketing Department. These representatives also identify and train new agents. We conduct regularly
scheduled webinars for agents as well as onsite training on company products and services. These include technical training about our products as well as
sales training to effectively market our products. We also offer our agents industry specific training that qualifies for continuing education credit for state
insurance license requirements.
Agents are compensated through a fixed base commission with an opportunity for profit sharing depending on the producer’s premiums written and
profitability. Agents receive commission as a percentage of premiums (generally 15% for most lines, except worker’s compensation policies which are
generally at 7.5%) as their primary compensation from us. We offer a contingent compensation plan as an incentive for producers to place high-quality
business with us and to support our loss control efforts. We believe that the contingent compensation paid to our producers is comparable with those offered
by other insurance companies and is designed to reward agents for growth and profitability.
Our marketing efforts are also supported by our claims, litigation, billing, underwriting and loss control departments. As industry specialists, we are
able to offer expertise in all interactions with agents and/or policyholders. For example, our claims philosophy is to provide prompt and efficient service
and claims processing, resulting in a positive experience for both the agents and policyholders. We take an aggressive, defense-oriented position on third
party liability claims which is recognized and appreciated by our policyholders. We believe that these positive experiences result in higher policyholder
retention and create new business opportunities for our agents. While we rely on our agents for front line distribution and customer support, underwriting,
billing, loss control and claim handling responsibilities are retained by us. Many of our agents have had direct relationships with us for a number of years.
Underwriting, Risk Assessment and Pricing
Our underwriting philosophy is aimed at consistently generating profits through sound risk selection, stringent loss control and pricing discipline. One
key element in sound risk selection is our use of risk characteristic metrics. Through our practice of focused underwriting, we have identified predictive
metrics of data that many other insurance companies do not recognize or measure. Use of these metrics allows us to more effectively price risks, thereby
improving our profitability and allowing us to compete favorably with other insurance carriers. We also are very active in leveraging our onsite loss control
inspections. An example would be the monitoring of kitchen fire suppression systems servicing to reduce kitchen fire losses.
Our philosophy is to understand our industry and be disciplined in our underwriting efforts. We will not compromise profitability for top line growth.
Our competitive strategy in underwriting is:
(cid:0) Maximize the use of available information acquired through a wide variety of industry resources.
(cid:0) Allow our internal metrics and rating to establish risk pricing and use sound underwriting judgment for risk selection and pricing modification.
(cid:0) Utilize our risk grading system, which combines both objective and subjective inputs, to quantify desirability of risks and improve our overall risk
profile.
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
Physically inspect most new insureds within the first 60 days of policy binding with our in-house loss control representatives. Our inspection
consists of an extensive risk profile questionnaire and includes 25 to 100 electronic photos of the insured’s place of business. Inspections that
demonstrate that a risk is not desirable is a basis for revoking coverage.
Provide very high-quality service to our agents and insureds by responding quickly and effectively to information requests and policy submissions.
Treat our agents as partners and have the same expectation of them.
Our underwriting department works in teams with each agent assigned to one of three teams. We underwrite our accounts by evaluating each risk with
consistently applied standards. Each policy undergoes a thorough evaluation process prior to every renewal.
~ 8 ~
Table of Contents
Our underwriting staff of 21 employees has an average of 18 years of insurance industry experience. Howard J. Beck, our Vice President – Chief
Underwriting Officer, has been with ICC since 2004 and has over 33 years of insurance experience with 26 years of property and casualty underwriting
experience.
We strive to be disciplined in our pricing by pursuing targeted rate changes to continually improve our underwriting profitability while still being able
to attract and retain profitable customers. Our pricing reviews involve evaluating our claims experience, loss trends, data acquired from inspections,
applications and other data sources to identify characteristics that drive the frequency and severity of our claims. These results drive changes to rates and
rating metrics as well as understanding what portions of our business are most profitable.
This knowledge and analysis enables us to price risks accurately, improve account retention, and drive profitable new business.
Claims and Litigation Management
Our claims team supports our underwriting strategy by working to provide a timely, good faith claims handling response to our policyholders. Claims
excellence is achieved by timely investigation and handling of claims, settlement of meritorious claims for equitable amounts, maintenance of adequate
case reserves, and control of claims loss settlement expenses.
Claims on insurance policies are received directly from the insured or through our independent agents. Our claims department supports our producer
relationship strategy by working to provide a consistently responsive level of claim service to our policyholders.
Chief Legal Officer, Julia Suiter, provides oversight of our claims and legal departments. She has over 25 years’ experience in insurance defense
litigation and contract law. Ms. Suiter, supervises a legal department staff that includes a Litigation Manager, a Litigation Counsel, a Paralegal, a Claims
Manager and a claims staff of 17 employees with considerable years of experience in processing property and casualty insurance claims.
Technology
Our technology efforts are focused on supporting our strategy of differentiating ourselves from our competitors through use of data mining, business
intelligence solutions, and data analysis to determine profitability of new and existing business and to better price risks that we underwrite.
We have streamlined internal processes to achieve operational efficiencies through the implementation of a policy and claim imaging and workflow
system. This system provides online access to electronic copies of policies, quotes, inspections, and any other correspondence enabling our associates to
quickly and efficiently underwrite policies, adjust claims, and respond to our producers’ inquiries.
Since the system integrates all aspects of the policy life cycle, from underwriting to billing to claims, we are able to better automate all internal
workflows through electronic routing thus lowering costs and providing better service to our customers. This system allows us to leverage loss control data
for predictive analytics in both the claims and underwriting areas. For example, in the underwriting area, we can create pricing models taking into account
the unique characteristics of our customers, such as neighborhoods, entertainment on site and average alcoholic beverage pricing.
We have implemented best in class virus or malware protections while still enabling our employees to work from any location. We are tested on a
periodic basis to ensure our protections are sufficient.
We have the ability to scale since we are almost entirely a paperless organization. This allows us to integrate off-site employees just as if they are in the
office. We intend to remain a leader in the industry by utilizing technology and data analysis to price our coverage based on the risk assumed and to both
reduce accidents and provide a prompt response to claims.
As part of our disaster recovery program, we utilize a third party backup software package to provide a complete copy of our production systems at an
off-site location that is updated on a daily basis. We also have a generator that will allow the home office to operate in the event power or access to our
headquarters is disrupted. We test this disaster recovery plan annually as well as continually expand its capabilities to eliminate business interruption to the
best of our ability.
~ 9 ~
Table of Contents
Reinsurance
In accordance with insurance industry practice, we reinsure a portion of our exposure and pay to the reinsurers a portion of the premiums received on
all policies reinsured. Insurance policies written by us are reinsured with other insurance companies principally to:
(cid:0)
reduce net liability on individual risks;
(cid:0) mitigate the effect of individual loss occurrences (including catastrophic losses);
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
stabilize underwriting results;
decrease leverage; and
increase our underwriting capacity.
Reinsurance can be facultative or treaty. Under facultative reinsurance, each policy or portion of a risk is reinsured individually. Under treaty
reinsurance, an agreed-upon portion of a class of business is automatically reinsured. Reinsurance also can be classified as quota share reinsurance, pro rata
reinsurance or excess of loss reinsurance. Under quota share reinsurance and pro rata reinsurance, the insurance company issuing the policy cedes a
percentage of its insurance liability to the reinsurer in exchange for a like percentage of premiums, less a ceding commission. The company issuing the
policy in turn recovers from the reinsurer the reinsurer’s share of all loss and settlement expenses incurred on those risks. Under excess of loss reinsurance,
an insurer limits its liability to all or a particular portion of the amount in excess of a predetermined deductible or retention. Regardless of type, reinsurance
does not legally discharge the insurance company issuing the policy from primary liability for the full amount due under the reinsured policies. However,
the assuming reinsurer is obligated to reimburse the company issuing the policy to the extent of the coverage ceded.
We determine the amount and scope of reinsurance coverage to purchase each year based on a number of factors. These factors include the evaluation
of the risks accepted, consultations with reinsurance intermediates and a review of market conditions, including the availability and pricing of reinsurance.
A primary factor in the selection of reinsurers from whom we purchase reinsurance is their financial strength. Our reinsurance arrangements are generally
renegotiated annually. We expect 2022’s reinsurance spend to be slightly lower than 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we ceded to reinsurers
$11.0 million of written premiums, compared to $10.1 million of written premiums for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The chart below illustrates the 2022 reinsurance coverage under our excess of loss treaty for individual liability and property risks (with the defined
terms following the chart):
~ 10 ~
Table of Contents
Term
1 @ x%
AAD
Meaning
“1” refers to the number of times that we reinstate the coverage. The number prior to the “%” sign indicates the overall
cost to us when reinstating coverage.
This is short for Aggregate Annual Deductible. Aggregate annual deductible is the maximum amount ICC needs to pay
within a policy period before the reinsurer pays for covered losses.
Aggregate Catastrophe
An aggregate catastrophe treaty is a reinsurance cover designed to help us manage the effects of multiple catastrophe
Basket Coverage
Casualty
Catastrophe
Free
Inures
MAOL
Per Risk
Retention
WC
XOL
XS
events on our results.
Excess liability reinsurance that attaches once retained losses in combined property and casualty occurrences (i.e. those
that involve BOP property and BOP liability, or Liquor Liability or Workers’ Compensation or Hired and Non-owned
Auto) exceed $1 million. If ICC has an occurrence where the combined property and casualty retention is greater than
$1 million then the company would recover up to $1 million of loss in excess of that $1 million retention. The basket
coverage limits the Company’s retention in any one combined occurrence to $1 million and not the combined separate
retentions provided for in the casualty reinsurance ($1.0 million), Workers’ Compensation reinsurance ($1.0 million),
Hired and Non-owned Auto reinsurance ($750,000) and Property reinsurance ($750,000).
For this chart, this refers to our Liquor Liability, BOP liability, Workers’ Compensation and any Umbrella policies.
Reflects the sum of all individual losses directly resulting from any one occurrence, disaster, accident or loss or a series
of occurrences, disasters, accidents or losses arising out of one event.
Refers to the number of reinstatements available for reinsurance coverage. With this wording, each separate loss
occurrence above the retention is covered by the treaty.
Our Workers’ Compensation reinsurance contracts are first applied to reduce the loss subject to the Casualty XOL
contract and are said to inure to the benefit of the Casualty XOL contract.
This reinsurance sublimit puts a cap on the maximum loss any one life/claimant can contribute to the reinsurance
recoverable.
Reinsurance in which the reinsurance limit and our loss retention apply “per risk,” rather than per accident, per event, or
in the aggregate.
The amount of loss and settlement expense retained by us either per occurrence on casualty losses or per risk on property
claims.
This is short for Workers’ Compensation.
This is short for Excess of Loss reinsurance coverage.
This is short for Excess. For example, our Property per Risk tower has three separate contracts providing coverage. The
top layer in that tower provides $7.0 million coverage for each risk for losses in excess of $5.0 million.
We retain the first $1.0 million of workers’ compensation losses. Losses in excess of the $1.0 million are covered under our casualty excess of loss
program within the Casualty XOL Tower up to $6.0 million. Losses above the $6.0 million are then covered under the second workers’ compensation treaty
through $11.0 million. Above $11.0 million, losses are covered under a workers’ compensation cover within the WC XOL Tower that provides $14.5
million in excess of $11.0 million. We have an additional cover that provides $10.0 million of coverage in excess of $25.5 million for nineteen direct
policies issued by the Company.
Casualty risks (Casualty XOL Tower) (business owners, liability, liquor liability, umbrella) are covered for $10.0 million in loss above a $1.0 million
retention for each loss occurrence.
Property per risk excess of loss program (Property Per Risk XOL Tower) provides coverage above our $750,000 retention up to $12.0 million on a
treaty basis and facultative for a few risks above that to their full limits.
Property catastrophe reinsurance (Section A Property Cat Occurrence) provides coverage in any one event for $14.0 million of loss in excess of our
$1.0 million retention.
We also have aggregate catastrophe protection (Section B Aggregate Catastrophe) in the event that catastrophe losses retained by us exceeds $2.0
million in such year. This program allows us to aggregate catastrophe events where losses exceed $100,000 but fall below the $1 million occurrence
retention.
~ 11 ~
Table of Contents
The insolvency or inability of any reinsurer to meet its obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition. Our reinsurance providers, the majority of whom are longstanding partners who understand our business, are all carefully selected with the help
of our reinsurance broker. We monitor the solvency of reinsurers through regular review of their financial statements and, if available, their A.M. Best
ratings. All of our reinsurance partners have at least an “A-” rating from A.M. Best. According to A.M. Best, companies with a rating of “A-” or better
“have an excellent ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders.”
The following table sets forth the largest amounts of loss and loss expenses unpaid and recoverable from reinsurers as of December 31, 2021:
Reinsurance Company
Platinum Underwriters
Hannover Rückversicherungs
Aspen Insurance UK Ltd
Partner Reinsurance Company
Everest Reinsurance Company
Swiss Reinsurance
Endurance Reinsurance
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Toa Reinsurance Company
Allied World Insurance Company
All other reinsurers including anticipated subrogation
Total
Losses and Settlement Expense Reserves
$
$
Losses and Settlement
Expense Recoverable
On Unpaid Claims
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Percentage of
Total
Recoverable
A.M. Best
Rating
2,684
1,932
1,805
1,496
1,163
1,143
852
609
341
162
102
2,232
14,521
18.5% A+
13.3% A+
12.4% A
10.3% A+
8.0% A+
7.9% A+
5.9% A+
4.2% A
2.3% A
1.1% A
0.7% A
15.4% A- or better
100.0%
We are required by applicable insurance laws and regulations to maintain reserves for payment of loss and settlement expenses. These reserves are
established for both reported claims and for claims incurred but not reported (IBNR), arising from the policies we have issued. The laws and regulations
require that provision be made for the ultimate cost of those claims without regard to how long it takes to settle them or the time value of money. The
determination of reserves involves actuarial and statistical projections of what we expect to be the cost of the ultimate settlement and administration of such
claims. The reserves are set based on facts and circumstances then known, estimates of future trends in claims severity, and other variable factors such as
inflation and changing judicial theories of liability.
Estimating the ultimate liability for losses and settlement expense is an inherently uncertain process. Therefore, the reserve for losses and settlement
expense does not represent an exact calculation of that liability. Our reserve policy recognizes this uncertainty by maintaining reserves at a level providing
for the possibility of adverse development relative to the estimation process. We do not discount our reserves to recognize the time value of money.
When a claim is reported to us, our claims personnel establish a “case reserve” for the estimated amount of the ultimate payment. This estimate reflects
an informed judgment based upon general insurance reserving practices and on the experience and knowledge of our claims staff. In estimating the
appropriate reserve, our claims staff considers the nature and value of the specific claim, the severity of injury or damage, and the policy provisions relating
to the type of loss. Case reserves are adjusted by our claims staff as more information becomes available. It is our policy to resolve each claim as
expeditiously as possible.
We maintain IBNR reserves to provide for already incurred claims that have not yet been reported and developments on reported claims. The IBNR
reserve is determined by estimating our ultimate net liability for both reported and IBNR claims and then subtracting the case reserves and paid loss and
settlement expense for reported claims.
Each quarter, we compute our estimated ultimate liability using principles and procedures applicable to the lines of business written. However, because
the establishment of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process, we cannot provide assurance that ultimate losses will not exceed the established loss
reserves. Adjustments in aggregate reserves, if any, are reflected in the operating results of the period during which such adjustments are made.
~ 12 ~
Table of Contents
The following table provides information about open claims, reserves, and paid loss and settlement expense on a direct basis only:
As of and for the period ended December 31, 2021
(In millions, except open claims count)
Commercial Multi-Peril (non-liability portion)
Commercial Multi-Peril (liability portion)
Workers' Compensation
Other Liability - occurrence
Total
Open Claims
422
325
156
251
1,154
$
$
6.77 $
28.77
7.87
18.11
61.52 $
5.30 $
12.59
4.46
7.77
30.12 $
Total Reserves1
Case Reserves
IBNR Reserves
Paid Losses and
Settlement
Expense
15.73
9.43
3.08
7.70
35.94
1.48 $
16.19
3.41
10.33
31.41 $
1 Assumed reserves of $0.31 million are excluded from the Total Gross Reserves. Workers' Compensation ($0.28 million assumed reserve) and Umbrella Liability ($0.03
million assumed reserve) are the only lines of business that have assumed reserves.
The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending unpaid losses and settlement expense reserve balances for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, prepared in accordance with GAAP.
(In thousands)
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - beginning of the period:
Gross
Less: Ceded
Net
Increase in incurred losses and settlement expense:
Current year
Prior years
Total incurred
Deduct: Loss and settlement expense payments for claims incurred:
Current year
Prior years
Total paid
Net unpaid losses and settlement expense - end of the period
Plus: Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
Gross unpaid losses and settlement expense - end of the period
2021
2020
61,576 $
13,020
48,556
33,968
732
34,700
14,740
21,203
35,943
47,314
14,521
61,835 $
56,838
11,036
45,802
31,356
1,206
32,562
13,054
16,754
29,808
48,556
13,020
61,576
$
$
The estimation process for determining the liability for unpaid losses and settlement expense inherently results in adjustments each year for claims
incurred (but not paid) in preceding years. Negative amounts reported for claims incurred related to prior years are a result of claims being settled for
amounts less than originally estimated (favorable development). Positive amounts reported for claims incurred related to prior years are a result of claims
being settled for amounts greater than originally estimated (unfavorable or adverse development).
Reconciliation of Reserve for Loss and Settlement Expenses
The following table shows the development of our reserves for unpaid loss and settlement expense from 2012 through 2021 on a GAAP basis. The top
line of the table shows the liabilities at the balance sheet date, including losses incurred but not yet reported. The upper portion of the table shows the
cumulative amounts subsequently paid as of successive years with respect to the liability. The lower portion of the table shows the re-estimated amount of
the previously recorded liability based on experience as of the end of each succeeding year. The estimates change as more information becomes known
about the frequency and severity of claims for individual years. The redundancy (deficiency) exists when the re-estimated liability for each reporting period
is less (greater) than the prior liability estimate. The “cumulative redundancy (deficiency)” depicted in the table, for any particular calendar year, represents
the aggregate change in the initial estimates over all subsequent calendar years.
Gross deficiencies and redundancies may be significantly more or less than net deficiencies and redundancies due to the nature and extent of applicable
reinsurance.
~ 13 ~
Table of Contents
As noted in the table below, since 2012 the Company has principally selected initial ultimate loss picks that have proven to be deficient over time.
(In thousands)
Liability for unpaid loss and settlement expense, net of
reinsurance recoverable
Cumulative amount of liability paid through:
One year later
Two years later
Three years later
Four years later
Five years later
Six years later
Seven years later
Eight years later
Nine years later
Liability estimated after:
One year later
Two years later
Three years later
Four years later
Five years later
Six years later
Seven years later
Eight years later
Nine years later
Cumulative total redundancy (deficiency):
Gross liability - end of year
Reinsurance recoverable
Net liability - end of year
Gross re-estimated liability - latest
Re-estimated reinsurance recoverables - latest
Net re-estimated liability - latest
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
$
35,976 $
36,340 $
38,795 $
41,898 $
40,702 $
41,048 $
44,714 $
45,802 $
48,556 $
47,314
12,188
20,899
27,481
31,900
33,842
34,593
34,854
34,982
35,306
35,113
35,574
35,379
36,029
35,744
35,471
35,350
35,225
35,456
54,623
18,647
35,976
56,391
20,935
35,456
12,509
22,677
29,923
33,651
35,207
36,053
36,356
36,914
—
36,765
36,209
36,766
37,274
36,958
37,045
36,924
37,223
—
57,334
20,994
36,340
58,883
21,660
37,223
14,088
26,877
34,742
37,926
39,452
40,224
40,810
—
—
38,237
39,598
41,569
41,348
41,519
41,355
41,637
—
—
64,618
25,823
38,795
68,520
26,883
41,637
17,686
29,066
35,548
39,047
40,592
41,835
—
—
—
40,417
42,176
42,294
43,108
43,155
43,903
—
—
—
61,054
19,156
41,898
62,013
18,110
43,903
16,841
26,640
34,275
37,901
41,614
—
—
—
—
39,667
41,573
43,011
43,772
45,310
—
—
—
—
52,817
12,115
40,702
56,764
11,454
45,310
17,122
28,219
34,955
41,329
—
—
—
—
—
42,525
44,176
45,156
47,581
—
—
—
—
—
51,074
10,030
41,044
56,467
8,886
47,581
17,311
27,719
37,237
—
—
—
—
—
—
44,839
45,631
47,963
—
—
—
—
—
—
51,447
6,736
44,711
56,982
9,019
47,963
16,737
31,628
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
46,993
49,918
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
56,838
11,036
45,802
60,855
10,937
49,918
21,203
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
49,288
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
61,576
61,835
13,020 14,521
48,556
47,314
64,271
14,983
49,288
Gross cumulative redundancy (deficiency)
Net cumulative redundancy (deficiency)
(1,768)
520
(1,549)
(883)
(3,902)
(2,842)
(959)
(2,005)
(3,947)
(4,608)
(5,393)
(6,537)
(5,535)
(3,252)
(4,017)
(4,116)
(2,695)
(732)
~ 14 ~
Table of Contents
Investments
Our investments in debt are classified as available for sale (AFS) and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected as a component
of comprehensive earnings and equity net of deferred taxes. Our investment in equity securities are carried at fair value with subsequent changes in fair
value recorded in net earnings. The goal of our investment activities is to complement and support our overall mission. As such, the investment portfolio’s
goal is to maximize after-tax investment income and price appreciation while maintaining the portfolio’s target risk profile.
An important component of our operating results has been the return on invested assets. Our investment objectives are (i) to preserve and grow capital
and surplus, in order to improve our competitive position and allow for expansion of insurance operations; (ii) to ensure sufficient cash flow and liquidity
to fund expected liability payments and otherwise support our underwriting strategy; (iii) to provide a reasonable and stable level of income; and (iv) to
maintain a portfolio which will assist in attaining the highest possible rating from A.M. Best. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Quantitative and Qualitative Information about Market Risk.
In addition to any investments prohibited by the insurance laws and regulations of Illinois and any other applicable states, our investment policy
prohibits the following investments and investing activities:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
short sales;
purchase of securities on margin;
hedge funds;
derivatives;
investment in commodities;
(cid:0) mortgage derivatives such as inverse floaters, interest only strips and principal only strips;
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
options, puts and futures contracts;
private placements; and
non-U.S. dollar denominated securities.
Our board of directors developed our investment policy and reviews the policy periodically. Exceptions to prohibitions discussed above are allowed
with express written authority of the board of directors investment committee, but under no circumstance may such exception exceed 5% of our invested
assets.
Our investment portfolio is managed by two independent third party firms.
The following table sets forth information concerning our investments in available for sale (AFS) securities, as of December 31:
(In thousands)
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Redeemable preferred stock
Total AFS securities
(In thousands)
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Redeemable preferred stock
Total AFS securities
Amortized Cost
Estimated Fair Value
2021
1,352
40,712
38,960
20,905
216
102,145
Amortized Cost
2020
1,353
40,509
39,187
17,489
216
98,754
$
$
$
$
1,346
41,024
41,207
22,032
233
105,842
Estimated Fair Value
1,385
41,743
43,581
18,789
242
105,740
$
$
$
$
~ 15 ~
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the distribution of our portfolio of fixed maturity investments as a percentage of total estimated fair value based on
credit ratings assigned by Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P), as of December 31:
2021
2020
Rating1
AAA
AA
A
BBB
BB
Total
$
$
Estimated Fair
Value
(In thousands)
Percent of Total2
Estimated Fair
Value
(In thousands)
25,582
33,975
26,619
17,686
1,980
105,842
24.2% $
32.1%
25.2%
16.7%
1.9%
100.0% $
Percent of Total2
23.9%
30.2%
27.5%
16.6%
1.8%
100.0%
25,272
31,934
29,079
17,553
1,902
105,740
1The ratings set forth in this table are based on the ratings assigned by S&P. If S&P’s ratings were unavailable, the equivalent ratings supplied by Moody’s Investor Service,
Fitch Investors Service, Inc. or the NAIC were used where available.
2Represents percent of fair value for classification as a percent of the total portfolio.
The table below sets forth the maturity profile of our debt securities, as of December 31, 2021. Expected maturities could differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without call or prepayment penalties.
(In thousands)
Less than one year
One through five years
Five through ten years
Greater than ten years
MBS/ABS
Redeemable preferred stock
Total debt securities
Amortized Cost
2,104
17,161
14,902
27,050
40,712
216
102,145
Estimated Fair Value1
2,139
17,834
15,662
28,950
41,024
233
105,842
$
$
$
$
1Debt securities are carried at fair value in our financials statements
At December 31, 2021, the average maturity of our fixed maturity investment portfolio was 9.39 years and the average duration was 5.54 years. As a
result, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate significantly in response to changes in interest rates. In addition, we may experience investment
losses to the extent our liquidity needs require the disposition of fixed maturity securities in unfavorable interest rate environments.
We use quoted values and other data provided by independent pricing services as inputs in our process for determining fair values of our investments.
The pricing services cover substantially all of the securities in our portfolio for which publicly quoted values are not available. The pricing services’
evaluations represent an exit price, a good faith opinion as to what a buyer in the marketplace would pay for a security in a current sale. The pricing is
based on observable inputs either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are active, quoted prices for similar securities at the
measurement date, or other inputs that are observable.
Our independent third party investment managers provide us with pricing information that they obtain from independent pricing services, to determine
the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. After performing a detailed review of the information obtained from the pricing service, limited adjustments
may be made by the managers to the values provided.
Our average cash and invested assets, net investment income and return on average cash and invested assets, for the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020 were as follows:
(In thousands)
Average cash and invested assets
Net investment income
Return on average cash and invested assets
$
2021
2020
$
140,677
3,414
2.4%
127,158
3,498
2.8%
~ 16 ~
Table of Contents
A.M. Best Rating
A.M. Best Company, Inc. (“A.M. Best”) rates insurance companies based on factors of concern to policyholders. A.M. Best currently assigns a “A-”
(Excellent) rating to ICC. This rating is the fourth highest out of 15 rating classifications. The next rating evaluation by A.M. Best is occurring on April 28,
2022 and therefore the report from this evaluation has not yet been released. According to the A.M. Best guidelines, companies rated “A-” are considered
by A.M. Best to have “an excellent ability to meet their ongoing insurance obligations.” The rating evaluates the claims paying ability of a company, and is
not a recommendation on the merits of an investment in our common stock.
In evaluating a company’s financial and operating performance, A.M. Best reviews:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
the company’s profitability, leverage and liquidity;
its book of business;
the adequacy and soundness of its reinsurance;
the quality and estimated fair value of its assets;
the adequacy of its reserves and surplus;
its capital structure;
the experience and competence of its management; and
its marketing presence.
In its ratings report on ICC, A.M. Best stated that ICC’s rating reflected ICC’s balance sheet strength, which A.M. Best categorizes as very strong, as
well as its adequate operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management. A.M. Best also stated that ICC’s balance
sheet reflects the company’s strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by Best’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR), its favorable
underwriting leverage measures compared with the commercial casualty composite averages, and its conservative reserving practices. A.M. Best has
assigned the Parent Company’s outlook to the Issuer Credit Rating as stable.
Competition
Given our exclusive focus on providing insurance products and services for the food and beverage industry, the market conditions for our business and,
accordingly, our competition, varies geographically based upon the states in which we operate and also by the segment of the food and beverage industry
(e.g., bars versus fine dining). In some states (Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin) competition is primarily from Midwest based regional carriers with
products targeting the food and beverage industry, such as Society Mutual Insurance Company, Badger Mutual Insurance Company, Midwest Family
Mutual Insurance Company, SPRISKA and West Bend Mutual Insurance Company. We have experienced increased competition in Missouri from larger
regional and national insurance companies without a focus on the food and beverage industry (such as Allied Insurance Company, Auto-Owners Insurance
Company and Travelers Insurance Company) and excess and surplus line insurance companies (such as EverGuard Insurance Services, Inc. and Lloyd’s of
London). In our eastern most states of Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, the primary competitors are well established national carriers with a strong
presence in those states such as Auto Owners, Erie and Cincinnati. In our most western states of Arizona and Colorado, we have found market
opportunities initially due to a lack of strong regional competition. Competition has increased in Colorado as both Society Mutual and SPRISKA have
entered the state. SPRISKA has also entered Arizona, however, it is not a strong competitor in our niche within that state. When evaluating the franchise
and fine dining segment of the food and beverage industry, we compete with national insurance carriers, such as Allied Insurance Company, Travelers
Insurance Company and The Hartford Insurance Company. For risks with greater alcohol and entertainment exposures, competition for liquor liability
comes from primarily excess and surplus lines companies such as USLI and Conifer.
~ 17 ~
Table of Contents
Despite significant competition, we believe we continue to maintain strong market share.
Number of Eating and
Drinking Places in 2021
10,281
12,031
25,488
6,285
12,196
5,328
16,543
10,681
11,200
22,547
26,548
12,796
171,924
Number of Locations Insured by
ICC at December 31, 2021
493
1,169
3,832
2,460
952
148
541
1,721
1,690
923
280
369
14,578
Approximate Market Share
(%)
4.8%
9.7%
15.0%
39.1%
7.8%
2.8%
3.3%
16.1%
15.1%
4.1%
1.1%
2.9%
8.5%
Total
Arizona
Colorado
Illinois
Iowa
Indiana
Kansas
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin
Source: National Restaurant Association; ICC
Talent
We recognize that our employees are our most valuable asset. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse workforce and promoting a
culture of respect where individual viewpoints are heard. The Company’s Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO), with oversight by the executive team,
leads our talent management initiatives. The CHRO’s key responsibilities include developing programs that advocate diversity, equity and inclusion within
the Company’s recruiting, selection, training and development practices.
The Company’s Total Rewards program is a competitive compensation package that supports the Company’s commitment to attracting and retaining a
talented workforce. In addition to base salaries or hourly wages, Total Rewards includes an annual profit-sharing incentive for all employees, an executive
long-term incentive plan, and retirement, health, disability and life insurance benefits. Local, regional and national compensation surveys are used by the
Human Resources Department to ensure a competitive compensation package exists for the Company’s positions.
An important component of the annual profit-sharing incentive is the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), a qualified retirement plan
that grants shares of the Company’s stock to eligible employees. The ESOP provides an avenue for employee shareholders to actively participate in
building value that is alignment with the interests of other shareholders. In addition to the ESOP, executives participate in a discretionary bonus program
where restricted stock units are awarded annually.
As of December 31, 2021, we had 89.5 full-time equivalent employees. None of these employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement,
and we believe that our employee relations are good.
Regulation
General
We are subject to extensive regulation, particularly at the state level. The method, extent and substance of such regulation varies by state, but generally
has its source in statutes and regulations that establish standards and requirements for conducting the business of insurance and that delegate regulatory
authority to state insurance regulatory agencies. In general, such regulation is intended for the protection of those who purchase or use insurance products,
not the companies that write the policies. These laws and regulations have a significant impact on our business and relate to a wide variety of matters
including accounting methods, agent and company licensure, claims procedures, corporate governance, examinations, investing practices, policy forms,
pricing, trade practices, reserve adequacy and underwriting standards.
~ 18 ~
Table of Contents
State insurance laws and regulations require ICC to file financial statements with state insurance departments everywhere it does business, and the
operations of ICC and its accounts are subject to examination by those departments at any time. ICC prepares statutory financial statements in accordance
with accounting practices and procedures prescribed or permitted by these departments.
Premium rate regulation varies greatly among jurisdictions and lines of insurance. In most states in which our subsidiaries write insurance, premium
rates for the various lines of insurance are subject to either prior approval or limited review upon implementation. States require rates for property-casualty
insurance that are adequate, not excessive, and not unfairly discriminatory.
Many jurisdictions have laws and regulations that limit an insurer’s ability to withdraw from a particular market. For example, states may limit an
insurer’s ability to cancel or non-renew policies. Laws and regulations that limit cancellation and non-renewal may restrict our ability to exit unprofitable
marketplaces in a timely manner.
Examinations
Examinations are conducted by the Illinois Department of Insurance every three to five years. The Illinois Department of Insurance’s last examination
of ICC was in November 2017 covering the period from 2012-2016. The report from this exam became available to other states or the public on May 16,
2018. The 2016 examination did not result in any adjustments to our financial position. In addition, there were no substantive qualitative matters indicated
in the examination report that had a material adverse impact on our operations. We expect our next examination to take place in 2022, covering the periods
2017-2021.
NAIC Risk-Based Capital Requirements
In addition to state-imposed insurance laws and regulations, the NAIC has adopted risk-based capital requirements that require insurance companies to
calculate and report information under a risk-based formula. These risk-based capital requirements attempt to measure statutory capital and surplus needs
based on the risks in a company’s mix of products and investment portfolio. Under the formula, a company first determines its “authorized control level”
risk-based capital. This authorized control level takes into account (i) the risk with respect to the insurer’s assets; (ii) the risk of adverse insurance
experience with respect to the insurer’s liabilities and obligations, (iii) the interest rate risk with respect to the insurer’s business; and (iv) all other business
risks and such other relevant risks as are set forth in the risk-based capital instructions. A company’s “total adjusted capital” is the sum of statutory capital
and surplus and such other items as the risk-based capital instructions may provide. The formula is designed to allow state insurance regulators to identify
weakly capitalized companies.
The requirements provide for four different levels of regulatory attention. The “company action level” is triggered if a company’s total adjusted capital
is less than 2.0 times its authorized control level but greater than or equal to 1.5 times its authorized control level. At the company action level, the
company must submit a comprehensive plan to the regulatory authority that discusses proposed corrective actions to improve the capital position. The
“regulatory action level” is triggered if a company’s total adjusted capital is less than 1.5 times but greater than or equal to 1.0 times its authorized control
level. At the regulatory action level, the regulatory authority will perform a special examination of the company and issue an order specifying corrective
actions that must be followed. The “authorized control level” is triggered if a company’s total adjusted capital is less than 1.0 times but greater than or
equal to 0.7 times its authorized control level; at this level the regulatory authority may take action it deems necessary, including placing the company
under regulatory control. The “mandatory control level” is triggered if a company’s total adjusted capital is less than 0.7 times its authorized control level;
at this level the regulatory authority is mandated to place the company under its control. The capital levels of ICC have never triggered any of these
regulatory capital levels. We cannot provide assurance, however, that the capital requirements applicable to ICC will not increase in the future.
NAIC Ratios
The NAIC also has developed a set of 13 financial ratios referred to as the Insurance Regulatory Information System (IRIS). On the basis of statutory
financial statements filed with state insurance regulators, the NAIC annually calculates these IRIS ratios to assist state insurance regulators in monitoring
the financial condition of insurance companies. The NAIC has established an acceptable range for each of the IRIS financial ratios. If four or more of its
IRIS ratios fall outside the range deemed acceptable by the NAIC, an insurance company may receive inquiries from individual state insurance
departments. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, ICC did not receive inquiries from regulators on results for any of the IRIS tests.
~ 19 ~
Table of Contents
Enterprise Risk Assessment
In 2012, the NAIC adopted the NAIC Amendments. The NAIC Amendments, when adopted by the various states, are designed to respond to perceived
gaps in the regulation of insurance holding company systems in the United States. One of the major changes is a requirement that an insurance holding
company system’s ultimate controlling person submit annually to its lead state insurance regulator an “enterprise risk report” that identifies activities,
circumstances or events involving one or more affiliates of an insurer that, if not remedied properly, are likely to have a material adverse effect upon the
financial condition or liquidity of the insurer or its insurance holding company system as a whole. Other changes include requiring a controlling person to
submit prior notice to its domiciliary insurance regulator of its divestiture of control, having detailed minimum requirements for cost sharing and
management agreements between an insurer and its affiliates and expanding of the agreements between an insurer and its affiliates to be filed with its
domiciliary insurance regulator. In addition, in 2012 the NAIC adopted the Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Model Act. The ORSA Model Act,
when adopted by the various states, requires an insurance holding company system’s chief risk officer to submit at least annually to its lead state insurance
regulator a confidential internal assessment appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of an insurer, conducted by that insurer of the material and
relevant risks identified by the insurer associated with an insurer’s current business plan and the sufficiency of capital resources to support those risks.
Although ICC is exempt from ORSA because of its size, we have incorporated elements of ORSA, that we believe constitute “best practices”, into our
annual internal enterprise risk assessment.
Market Conduct Regulation
State insurance laws and regulations include numerous provisions governing trade practices and the marketplace activities of insurers, including
provisions governing the form and content of disclosure to consumers, illustrations, advertising, sales practices and complaint handling. State regulatory
authorities generally enforce these provisions through periodic market conduct examinations.
Property and Casualty Regulation
Our property and casualty operations are subject to rate and policy form approval, as well as laws and regulations covering a range of trade and claim
settlement practices. State insurance regulatory authorities have broad discretion in approving an insurer’s proposed rates. The extent to which a state
restricts underwriting and pricing of a line of business may adversely affect an insurer’s ability to operate that business profitably in that state on a
consistent basis.
State insurance laws and regulations require us to participate in mandatory property-liability “shared market,” “pooling” or similar arrangements that
provide certain types of insurance coverage to individuals or others who otherwise are unable to purchase coverage voluntarily provided by private
insurers. Shared market mechanisms include assigned risk plans and fair access to insurance requirement or “FAIR” plans. In addition, some states require
insurers to participate in reinsurance pools for claims that exceed specified amounts. Our participation in these mandatory shared market or pooling
mechanisms generally is related to the amount of our direct writings for the type of coverage written by the specific arrangement in the applicable state. We
cannot predict the financial impact of our participation in these arrangements. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
Guaranty Fund Laws
All states have guaranty fund laws under which insurers doing business in the state can be assessed to fund policyholder liabilities of insolvent
insurance companies. Under these laws, an insurer is subject to assessment depending upon its market share in the state of a given line of business. For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we incurred $18,000 and recovered $11,000, respectively, in assessments pursuant to state insurance guaranty
association laws. We establish reserves relating to insurance companies that are subject to insolvency proceedings when we are notified of assessments by
the guaranty associations. We cannot predict the amount and timing of any future assessments on ICC under these laws. See Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
~ 20 ~
Table of Contents
Federal Regulation
The U.S. federal government generally has not directly regulated the insurance industry except for certain areas of the market, such as insurance for
flood, nuclear and terrorism risks. However, the federal government has undertaken initiatives or considered legislation in several areas that may impact the
insurance industry, including tort reform, corporate governance and the taxation of reinsurance companies. The Dodd-Frank Act established the Federal
Insurance Office which is authorized to study, monitor and report to Congress on the insurance industry and to recommend that the Financial Stability
Oversight Council designate an insurer as an entity posing risks to the U.S. financial stability in the event of the insurer’s material financial distress or
failure. In December 2013, the Federal Insurance Office issued a report on alternatives to modernize and improve the system of insurance regulation in the
United States, including increasing national uniformity through either a federal charter or effective action by the states. Changes to federal legislation and
administrative policies in several areas, including changes in federal taxation, can also significantly impact the insurance industry and us.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Enacted in 2002, the stated goals of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX, are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced
penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of
corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. We became subject to most of the provisions of the SOX immediately after completion of the mutual-
to-stock conversion.
The SOX includes very specific disclosure requirements and corporate governance rules and requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt
extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related regulations.
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002
In January 2015 and December 2019, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 and 2019, respectively,
which amended and extended the Terrorism Insurance Program through December 31, 2027. Under this law, coverage provided by an insurer for losses
caused by certified acts of terrorism is partially reimbursed by the United States under a formula under which the government pays 80% of covered
terrorism losses exceeding a prescribed deductible. The act limits an insurer’s exposure to certified terrorist acts (as defined by the Act) to the prescribed
deductible amount. The insurance industry’s aggregate deductible is $41.7 billion in 2021. Each insurer’s deductible is capped at 20% of the insurer’s direct
earned premium for commercial property and casualty policies. Coverage under the act must be offered to all property, casualty and surety insureds.
The new law also amended the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to establish the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers as a nonprofit
corporation with the purpose of prescribing licensing and producer qualification requirements and conditions on a multi-state basis.
Privacy
As mandated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, states continue to promulgate and refine laws and regulations that require financial institutions,
including insurance companies, to take steps to protect the privacy of certain consumer and customer information relating to products or services primarily
for personal, family or household purposes. An NAIC initiative that affected the insurance industry was the adoption in 2000 of the Privacy of Consumer
Financial and Health Information Model Regulation, which assisted states in promulgating regulations to comply with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. In
2002, to further facilitate the implementation of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the NAIC adopted the Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information
Model Regulation. Several states have now adopted similar provisions regarding the safeguarding of customer information. We have implemented
procedures to comply with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s related privacy requirements.
OFAC
The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) maintains a list of “Specifically Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons” (the
SDN List). The SDN List identifies persons and entities that the government believes are associated with terrorists, rogue nations or drug traffickers.
OFAC’s regulations prohibit insurers, among others, from doing business with persons or entities on the SDN List. If the insurer finds and confirms a
match, the insurer must take steps to block or reject the transaction, notify the affected person and file a report with OFAC.
~ 21 ~
Table of Contents
JOBS Act
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage
of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, such as
reduced public company reporting, accounting and corporate governance requirements. We currently avail ourselves of the reduced disclosure obligations
regarding executive compensation.
Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in
Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay
the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have taken advantage of the extended
transition period provided by Section 107 of the JOBS Act. We decided to comply with the effective dates for financial accounting standards applicable to
emerging growth companies at a later date in compliance with the requirements in Sections 107(b)(2) and (3) of the JOBS Act. Such decision is
irrevocable.
We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years following our IPO, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in
which our annual gross revenue exceeds $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than
$1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.
In addition, as an emerging growth company, we are exempt from Section 14A (a) and (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which require
shareholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachutes.
Dividends
Illinois law sets the maximum amount of dividends that may be paid by ICC during any twelve-month period after notice to, but without prior approval
of, the Illinois Department of Insurance. This amount cannot exceed the greater of 10% of the insurance company’s surplus as regards policyholders as
reported on the most recent annual statement filed with the Illinois Department of Insurance, or the insurance company’s statutory net income for the period
covered by the annual statement as reported on such statement. As of December 31, 2021, the amount available for payment of dividends by ICC in 2021
without the prior approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance is approximately $6.3 million. “Extraordinary dividends” in excess of the foregoing
limitations may only be paid with prior notice to, and approval of, the Illinois Department of Insurance. See Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis –
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Holding Company Laws
Most states have enacted legislation that regulates insurance holding company systems. Each insurance company in a holding company system is
required to register with the insurance supervisory agency of its state of domicile and furnish certain information. This includes information concerning the
operations of companies within the holding company group that may materially affect the operations, management or financial condition of the insurers
within the group. Pursuant to these laws, the Illinois Department of Insurance requires disclosure of material transactions involving ICC and its affiliates,
and requires prior notice and/or approval of certain transactions, such as “extraordinary dividends” distributed by ICC. Under these laws, the Illinois
Department of Insurance also has the right to examine us at any time.
All transactions within our consolidated group affecting ICC must be fair and equitable. Notice of certain material transactions between ICC and any
person or entity in our holding company system will be required to be given to the Illinois Department of Insurance. Certain transactions cannot be
completed without the prior approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance.
Approval of the state insurance commissioner is required prior to any transaction affecting the control of an insurer domiciled in that state. In Illinois,
the acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of an insurer or its holding company is presumed to be a change in control. Illinois law
also prohibits any person or entity from (i) making a tender offer for, or a request or invitation for tenders of, or seeking to acquire or acquiring any voting
security of an Illinois insurer if, after the acquisition, the person or entity would be in control of the insurer, or (ii) effecting or attempting to effect an
acquisition of control of or merger with an Illinois insurer, unless the offer, request, invitation, acquisition, effectuation or attempt has received the prior
approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance.
~ 22 ~
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, a potential investor should carefully consider the following risk
factors in deciding whether to purchase our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Business
A reduction in our A.M. Best rating could affect our ability to write new business or renew our existing business.
Ratings assigned by A.M. Best are an important factor influencing the competitive position of insurance companies. A.M. Best ratings, which are
reviewed at least annually, represent independent opinions of financial strength and ability to meet obligations to policyholders and are not directed toward
the protection of investors. Therefore, our A.M. Best rating should not be relied upon as a basis for an investment decision to purchase our common stock.
ICC holds a financial strength rating of “A-“ (Excellent) by A.M. Best, the fourth highest rating out of 15 rating classifications. Our upcoming
evaluation by A.M. Best will occur on April 28, 2022, with the ratings from this evaluation being released thereafter. Our most recent prior evaluation
occurred on April 28, 2021, when A.M. Best assigned its outlook as stable for ICC’s issuer credit rating, and upgraded its financial strength rating to “A-“
from “B++” (Good) and upgraded its issuer credit rating to “a-“ from “bbb+”. Financial strength ratings are used by producers and customers as a means of
assessing the financial strength and quality of insurers. Issuer credit ratings is an opinion by A.M. Best of an entity’s ability to meet its ongoing financial
obligations. If our financial position deteriorates, we may not maintain our favorable financial strength and issuer credit ratings from A.M. Best. A
downgrade of our rating could severely limit or prevent us from writing desirable business or from renewing our existing business. In addition, a
downgrade could negatively affect our ability to implement our strategy. See Item 1. Business — A.M. Best Rating.
Our food and beverage customers have been the target of claims and lawsuits. Proceedings of this nature, if successful, could result in our
payment of substantial costs and damages.
Occasionally, patrons of our food and beverage industry insured customers file complaints or lawsuits against our insureds alleging a variety of claims
arising in the ordinary course of their business, including personal injury claims, contract claims and claims alleging violations of federal and state laws. In
addition, certain of our insured customers who serve alcohol are subject to state “dram shop” or similar laws that generally allow a person to sue our
customer if that person was injured by a legally intoxicated person who was wrongfully served alcoholic beverages by our customer. A number of these
lawsuits in the food and beverage industry have resulted in the payment of substantial damages by us on behalf of our insureds.
Additionally, states have, from time to time, explored lowering the blood alcohol content levels for criminal statutes related to driving under the
influence or similar laws, removing or increasing caps for liability with respect to injuries by a legally intoxicated person, or preventing or limiting rate
changes by insurance companies.
Regardless of whether any claims against our customers are valid or whether they are liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may result in
significant liabilities. Defense costs, even for unfounded claims, or a judgment or other liability in excess of our reinsurance limits for any claims or any
adverse publicity resulting from claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our strategy for growing our business may not be profitable.
Over the past several years, we have made, and our current plans are to continue to make, investments in our lines of business, and we have increased
expenses in order to, among other things, strengthen our product offerings and service capabilities, expand into new geographic areas, improve technology
and our operating models, build expertise in our personnel, and expand our distribution capabilities, with the ultimate goal of achieving significant,
sustained growth. The ability to achieve significant profitable premium growth in order to earn adequate returns on such investments and expenses, and to
grow further without proportionate increases in expenses, is an important part of our current strategy. There can be no assurance that we will be successful
at profitably growing our business, or that we will not alter our current strategy due to changes in our markets or an inability to successfully maintain
acceptable margins on new business or for other reasons, in which case premiums written and earned, operating income and net book value could be
adversely affected.
~ 23 ~
Table of Contents
Our investment performance may suffer as a result of adverse capital market developments, which may affect our financial results and ability to
conduct business.
We invest the premiums we receive from policyholders until cash is needed to pay insured claims or other expenses. We had net realized investment
gains of $983,000 and net realized investment losses of $(245,000) for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Our
investments will be subject to a variety of investment risks, including risks relating to general economic conditions, market volatility, interest rate
fluctuations, liquidity risk and credit risk. An unexpected increase in the volume or severity of claims may force us to liquidate securities, which may cause
us to incur capital losses. If we do not structure the duration of our investments to match our insurance liabilities, we may be forced to liquidate
investments prior to maturity at a significant loss to cover such payments. Investment losses could significantly decrease our asset base and statutory
surplus, thereby affecting our ability to conduct business. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations —Quantitative and Qualitative Information About Market Risk.
The geographic distribution of our business exposes us to significant natural disasters, which may negatively affect our financial and operating
results.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, approximately 24.0% of our direct premiums written originated from business written in Illinois, and therefore,
we have a greater exposure to catastrophic or other significant natural or man-made losses in that geographic region. The incidence and severity of such
events are inherently unpredictable. In recent years, changing climate conditions have increased the unpredictability, severity and frequency of tornados,
hurricanes, and other storms.
States and regulators from time to time have taken action that has the effect of limiting the ability of insurers to manage these risks, such as prohibiting
insurers from reducing exposures or withdrawing from catastrophe-prone areas, or mandating that insurers participate in residual markets. Our ability or
willingness to manage our exposure to these risks may be limited due to considerations of public policy, the evolving political environment, or social
responsibilities. We may choose to write business in catastrophe-prone geographic areas that we might not otherwise write for strategic purposes, such as
improving our access to other underwriting opportunities.
Our ability to properly estimate reserves related to tornados and storms can be affected by the inability to access portions of the impacted areas, the
complexity of factors contributing to the losses, the legal and regulatory uncertainties, and the nature of the information available to establish the reserves.
These complex factors include, but are not limited to the following:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
determining whether damages were caused by flooding versus wind;
evaluating general liability and pollution exposures;
the impact of increased demand for products and services necessary to repair or rebuild damaged properties;
infrastructure disruption;
fraud;
the effect of mold damage;
business interruption costs; and
reinsurance collectability.
The estimates related to catastrophes are adjusted as actual claims are filed and additional information becomes available. This adjustment could
reduce income during the period in which the adjustment is made, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Large-scale natural disasters may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Midwest has historically been at a relatively high risk of natural disasters such as tornados, blizzards and flooding. If the Midwest were to
experience a large-scale natural disaster, claims incurred would likely increase and our insured’s properties may incur substantial damage, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
~ 24 ~
Table of Contents
Our results may fluctuate as a result of many factors, including cyclical changes in the insurance industry, which may lead to reduced premium
volume.
Results of companies in the insurance industry, and particularly the property and casualty insurance industry, historically have been subject to
significant fluctuations and uncertainties. The industry’s profitability can be affected significantly by:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
rising levels of actual costs that are not known by companies at the time they price their products;
volatile and unpredictable developments, including man-made and natural catastrophes;
changes in reserves resulting from the general claims and legal environments as different types of claims arise and judicial interpretations relating
to the scope of insurers’ liability develop; and
fluctuations in interest rates, inflationary pressures and other changes in the investment environment, which affect returns on invested capital and
may impact the ultimate payout of losses.
Historically, the financial performance of the insurance industry has fluctuated in cyclical periods of low premium rates and excess underwriting
capacity resulting from increased competition (a so-called “soft market”), followed by periods of high premium rates and a shortage of underwriting
capacity resulting from decreased competition (a so-called “hard market”). Fluctuations in underwriting capacity, demand and competition, and the impact
on our business of the other factors identified above, could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Because estimating future losses is difficult and uncertain, if our actual losses exceed our loss reserves, our operating results may be adversely
affected.
We maintain reserves to cover amounts we estimate will be needed to pay for insured losses and for the expenses necessary to settle claims. Estimating
loss and loss expense reserves is a difficult and complex process involving many variables and subjective judgments. We regularly review our reserve
estimate protocols and our overall amount of reserves. We review historical data and consider the impact of various factors such as:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
trends in claim frequency and severity;
information regarding each claim for losses;
legislative enactments, judicial decisions and legal developments regarding damages; and
trends in general economic conditions, including inflation.
Our actual losses could exceed our reserves. If we determine that our loss reserves are inadequate, we will have to increase them. This adjustment
would reduce income during the period in which the adjustment is made, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results
of operations. Such adjustments to loss reserve estimates are referred to as “loss development.” If existing loss reserves exceed the revised estimate, it is
referred to as positive loss development. Negative loss development occurs when the revised estimate of expected losses with respect to a calendar year
exceed existing loss reserves. For additional information, see Item 1. Business — Loss and Settlement Expense Reserves.
If our reinsurers do not pay our claims in accordance with our reinsurance agreements, we may incur losses.
We are subject to loss and credit risk with respect to the reinsurers with whom we deal because buying reinsurance does not relieve us of our liability
to policyholders. If our reinsurers are not capable of fulfilling their financial obligations to us, our insurance losses would increase. For the year ended
December 31, 2021, we ceded 15.4% of our direct written premiums to our reinsurers. We secure reinsurance coverage from a number of reinsurers. The
lowest A.M. Best rating issued to any of our reinsurers is “A-” (Excellent), which is the fourth highest of fifteen ratings. See Item 1. Business —
Reinsurance.
~ 25 ~
Table of Contents
The property and casualty insurance market in which we operate is highly competitive, which limits our ability to increase premiums for our
products and recruit new producers.
Competition in the property and casualty insurance business is based on many factors. These factors include the perceived financial strength of the
insurer, premiums charged, policy terms and conditions, services provided, reputation, financial ratings assigned by independent rating agencies and the
experience of the insurer in the line of insurance to be written. We compete with stock insurance companies, mutual companies, local cooperatives and
other underwriting organizations. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and operating resources than we have. Many of
the lines of insurance we write are subject to significant price competition. If our competitors price their products aggressively, our ability to grow or renew
our business may be adversely affected. We pay producers on a commission basis to produce business. Some of our competitors may offer higher
commissions or insurance at lower premium rates through the use of salaried personnel or other distribution methods that do not rely on independent
agents. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain business and thereby reduce our profits from operations.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by any loss of business from key producers.
Our products are primarily marketed by independent agents. Other insurance companies compete with us for the services and allegiance of these
producers. These producers may choose to direct business to our competitors, or may direct less desirable risks to us. We had one producer that was
responsible for more than 5% of our direct premiums written. This producer accounted for $6.55 million or approximately 9.2% of our direct premiums
written in 2021. No other producer accounted for more than 5% of our 2021 direct premiums written. If we experience a significant decrease in business
from, or lose entirely, our largest producers, it would have a material adverse effect on us.
Our revenues may fluctuate with our investment results and changes in interest rates.
Our investment portfolio contains a significant amount of fixed income securities. The fair values of these invested assets fluctuate depending upon
economic conditions, particularly changes in interest rates. We may not be able to prevent or minimize the negative impact of interest rate changes on
equity, for unrealized losses. Additionally, unforeseen circumstances may force us to sell certain of our invested assets at a time when their fair values are
less than their original cost, resulting in realized capital losses, which would reduce our net earnings.
Proposals to federally regulate the insurance business could affect our business.
Currently, the U.S. federal government does not directly regulate the insurance business. However, federal legislation and administrative policies in
several areas can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. These areas include financial services regulation, securities regulation, pension
regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation. In addition, various forms of direct federal regulation of insurance have been proposed. These
proposals generally would maintain state-based regulation of insurance, but would affect state regulation of certain aspects of the insurance business,
including rates, producer and company licensing, and market conduct examinations. We cannot predict whether any of these proposals will be adopted, or
what impact, if any, such proposals or, if enacted, such laws may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If we fail to comply with insurance industry regulations, or if those regulations become more burdensome, we may not be able to operate
profitably.
We are regulated by the Illinois Department of Insurance, as well as, to a more limited extent, the federal government and the insurance departments of
other states in which we do business. For the year ended December 31, 2021, approximately 24.0% of our direct premiums written originated from business
written in Illinois. Therefore, the cancellation or suspension of our license in Illinois, as a result of any failure to comply with the applicable insurance laws
and regulations, may negatively impact our operating results.
Most insurance regulations are designed to protect the interests of policyholders rather than shareholders and other investors. These regulations relate
to, among other things:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
approval of policy forms and premium rates;
standards of solvency, including establishing requirements for minimum capital and surplus, and for risk-based capital;
classifying assets as admissible for purposes of determining solvency and compliance with minimum capital and surplus requirements;
licensing of insurers and their producers;
~ 26 ~
Table of Contents
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
advertising and marketing practices;
restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments;
assessments by guaranty associations and mandatory pooling arrangements;
restrictions on the ability to pay dividends;
restrictions on transactions between affiliated companies;
restrictions on the size of risks insurable under a single policy;
requiring deposits for the benefit of policyholders;
requiring certain methods of accounting;
periodic examinations of our operations and finances;
claims practices;
prescribing the form and content of reports of financial condition required to be filed; and
requiring reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other purposes.
The Illinois Department of Insurance also conducts periodic examinations of the affairs of insurance companies and requires the filing of annual and
other reports relating to financial condition, holding company issues and other matters. These regulatory requirements may adversely affect or inhibit our
ability to achieve some or all of our business objectives. Our last examination by the Illinois Department of Insurance was in November 2017. We expect
our next examination to take place in 2022.
In addition, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the violation of regulations.
Further, changes in the level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or interpretations by regulatory authorities
could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
Our ability to manage our exposure to underwriting risks depends on the availability and cost of reinsurance coverage.
Reinsurance is the practice of transferring part of an insurance company’s liability and premium under an insurance policy to another insurance
company. We use reinsurance arrangements to limit and manage the amount of risk we retain, to stabilize our underwriting results and to increase our
underwriting capacity. The availability and cost of reinsurance are subject to current market conditions and may vary significantly over time. Any decrease
in the amount of our reinsurance will increase our risk of loss. We may be unable to maintain our desired reinsurance coverage or to obtain other
reinsurance coverage in adequate amounts and at favorable rates. If we are unable to renew our expiring coverage or obtain new coverage, it will be
difficult for us to manage our underwriting risks and operate our business profitably.
It is also possible that the losses we experience on risks we have reinsured will exceed the coverage limits on the reinsurance. If the amount of our
reinsurance coverage is insufficient, our insurance losses could increase substantially.
~ 27 ~
Table of Contents
The Company relies on information technology and telecommunication systems, and the disruption or failure of these systems, or the compromise
of the security of the systems that results in the misuse of confidential information, could materially and adversely affect its business.
The Company’s business is highly dependent upon the successful and uninterrupted functioning of the information technology and telecommunications
systems of ICC and its third party vendors. We have established security policies, processes and layers of defense designed to help identify and protect
against intentional and unintentional misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information and disruption of our operations. Our employees
participate in ongoing security awareness training focused on the prevention and identification of possible threats. We also have security measures in place
which are focused on the prevention, detection and remediation of damage from computer viruses, natural disasters, unauthorized access, cyber attack and
other similar disruptions.
Despite these efforts, our systems may be damaged, disrupted, or shut down due to attacks by unauthorized access, malicious software, undetected
intrusion, hardware failures, or other events, and in these circumstances our disaster recovery planning may be ineffective or inadequate. Information
technology security threats from user error to cybersecurity attacks are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Cybersecurity attacks may range from
random attempts to coordinated and targeted attacks, including sophisticated computer crime and advanced threats. These threats pose a risk to the security
of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data. No cybersecurity attack has had a material impact on our
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, the potential consequences of a material cybersecurity attack include reputational damage,
litigation with third parties, and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs. A sustained business interruption or system failure could
adversely impact our ability to process our business, provide customer service, pay claims in a timely manner or perform other necessary business
functions. We could also be subject to fines and penalties from a security breach. The cost to remedy a severe breach could be substantial.
We could be adversely affected by the loss of our existing management or key employees.
The success of our business is dependent, to a large extent, on our ability to attract and retain key employees, in particular our senior officers. Our
business may be adversely affected if labor market conditions make it difficult for us to replace our current key officers with individuals having equivalent
qualifications and experience at compensation levels competitive for our industry. In particular, because of the shortage of experienced underwriters and
claims personnel who have experience or training in the liquor liability sector of the insurance industry, replacing key employees in that line of our business
could be challenging. Our key officers include: Arron K. Sutherland, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Michael R. Smith, our Vice President –
Chief Financial Officer, Norman D. Schmeichel, our Vice President – Chief Information Officer, Howard J. Beck, our Vice President – Chief Underwriting
Officer, Julia B. Suiter, our Chief Legal Officer, and Kathleen S. Springer, our Chief Human Resources Officer. These key officers have an average of more
than 23 years of experience in the property and casualty insurance industry.
We do not have agreements not to compete or employment agreements with our employees, except for our employment agreement with Mr. Sutherland
and change in control agreements with certain officers, including Messrs. Smith, Schmeichel, and Beck, and Mesdames Suiter and Springer. Our
employment agreement with Mr. Sutherland and change in control agreements have change of control provisions that provide for certain payments and the
continuation of certain benefits in the event such officer is terminated without cause or such officer voluntarily quits for good reason after a change in
control.
Losses resulting from political instability, acts of war or terrorism may negatively affect our financial and operating results.
Numerous classes of business are exposed to terrorism related catastrophic risks. The frequency, number and severity of these losses are unpredictable.
As a result, we have changed our underwriting protocols to address terrorism and the limited availability of terrorism reinsurance. However, given the
uncertainty of the potential threats, we cannot be sure that we have addressed all the possibilities.
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as extended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Acts of 2015 and 2019, is effective
through December 31, 2027. Prior to the act, insurance coverage from private insurers for losses (other than workers’ compensation) arising out of acts of
terrorism was severely limited. The act provides, among other things, that all licensed insurers must offer coverage on most commercial lines of business
for acts of terrorism. Losses arising out of acts of terrorism that are certified as such by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States (in consultation
with the Secretary of Homeland Security) and that exceed $200 million in any year will be reimbursed by the federal government subject to a limit of $100
billion. Each insurance company is responsible for a deductible equal to 20% of its direct earned premiums in the previous calendar year, up to the insurer’s
proportionate share of the $100 billion. Our deductible is approximately $12.93 million for 2021. For losses in excess of the deductible, the federal
government will reimburse 80% of the insurer’s loss.
~ 28 ~
Table of Contents
Notwithstanding the protection provided by reinsurance and the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, the risk of severe losses to us from acts of
terrorism has not been eliminated. Our reinsurance contracts include various limitations or exclusions limiting the reinsurers’ obligation to cover losses
caused by acts of terrorism. Accordingly, events constituting acts of terrorism may not be covered by, or may exceed the capacity of, our reinsurance and
could adversely affect our business and financial condition
We could be adversely affected by any interruption to our ability to conduct business at our current location.
Our business operations could be substantially interrupted by flooding, snow, ice, and other weather-related incidents, or from fire, power loss,
telecommunications failures, terrorism, or other such events. In such an event, we may not have sufficient redundant facilities to cover a loss or failure in
all aspects of our business operations and to restart our business operations in a timely manner. Any damage caused by such a failure or loss may cause
interruptions in our business operations that may adversely affect our service levels and business. See Item 1. Business — Technology.
Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or other standard-setting bodies may adversely
affect our consolidated financial statements.
Our consolidated financial statements are subject to the application of GAAP, which is periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, we are
required to adopt new or revised accounting standards from time to time issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB. It is possible that
future changes we are required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such
changes could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Assessments and premium surcharges for state guaranty funds, second injury funds and other mandatory pooling arrangements may reduce our
profitability.
Most states require insurance companies licensed to do business in their state to participate in guaranty funds, which require the insurance companies
to bear a portion of the unfunded obligations of impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies. These obligations are funded by assessments, which are
expected to continue in the future. State guaranty associations levy assessments, up to prescribed limits, on all member insurance companies in the state
based on their proportionate share of premiums written in the lines of business in which the impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies are engaged.
Accordingly, the assessments levied on us may increase as we increase our written premiums. Some states also have laws that establish second injury funds
to reimburse insurers and employers for claims paid to injured employees for aggravation of prior conditions or injuries. These funds are supported by
either assessments or premium surcharges based on incurred losses. See Item 1. Business — Regulation.
In addition, as a condition to conducting business in some states, insurance companies are required to participate in residual market programs to
provide insurance to those who cannot procure coverage from an insurance carrier on a negotiated basis. Insurance companies generally can fulfill their
residual market obligations by, among other things, participating in a reinsurance pool where the results of all policies provided through the pool are shared
by the participating insurance companies. Although we price our insurance to account for our potential obligations under these pooling arrangements, we
may not be able to accurately estimate our liability for these obligations. Accordingly, mandatory pooling arrangements may cause a decrease in our profits.
At December 31, 2021, we participated in mandatory pooling arrangements in four states. As we write policies in new states that have mandatory pooling
arrangements, we will be required to participate in additional pooling arrangements. Further, the impairment, insolvency or failure of other insurance
companies in these pooling arrangements would likely increase the liability for other members in the pool. The effect of assessments and premium
surcharges or increases in such assessments or surcharges could reduce our profitability in any given period or limit our ability to grow our business. See
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Our operations in Mexico expose us to additional risks, which could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
The Company utilizes resources in Mexico through operations at Estrella. These operations expose us to additional risks including currency exchange
rate fluctuations. The Company is paid and is billed for services in U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate to the Mexican Peso. Any changes to the
exchange rate could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
~ 29 ~
Table of Contents
Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material
adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We are subject to the ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as applicable to emerging growth
companies, which requires management to assess the effectiveness of internal controls. As described in Item 9A of Part II of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021. The process of designing and
implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and
regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as
a public company. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses identified or that we may identify in the
future, or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, we are required to prepare assessments regarding internal control over
financial reporting and furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective
internal control environment or complete our Section 404 certifications could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
Any failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses or to implement new or
improved controls could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our consolidated
financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal controls and, in the
case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls
could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common
stock.
Risk Factors Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
A small number of shareholders collectively own a substantial portion of our common stock and voting power, and, because of restrictions on their
ability to buy or sell our shares, our public float will be limited.
Collectively, the three investors who purchased shares from us pursuant to investment agreements (the Clinton-Flood Purchasers, Rock Island
Investors, LLC, and Tuscarora Wayne) own or exercise voting and investment control of 1.0 million of our shares, or 29.0% of our outstanding common
stock. Pursuant to their respective purchase agreement, each investor has agreed to, among other things, vote as recommended by our board of directors
(subject to limited exceptions), agree to a standstill provision, including from purchasing shares of our common stock except as provided by a contractual
preemptive right, for up to seven years, agreed to restrictions on their respective ability to sell their shares of our common stock.
If and for so long as an investor beneficially owns two percent (2.0%) or more of the shares of our common stock and a standstill termination event has
not occurred, the investor shall generally vote and cause to be voted all shares of common stock beneficially owned by such investor (a) for persons
nominated and recommended by ICC Holdings’ Board of Directors for election as directors of ICC Holdings’ Board of Directors and against any person
nominated for election as a director by any other person or entity, and (b) as directed or recommended by ICC Holdings’ Board of Directors with respect to
any proposal presented at any meeting of ICC Holdings’ shareholders, including, but not limited to (i) the entire slate of directors recommended for
election by the ICC Holdings’ Board of Directors to the shareholders of ICC Holdings at any meeting of ICC Holdings’ shareholders at which any directors
are elected, (ii) any shareholder proposal submitted for a vote at any meeting of ICC Holdings’ shareholders, and (iii) any proposal submitted by ICC
Holdings for a vote at any meeting of ICC Holdings’ shareholders relating (A) to the appointment of ICC Holdings’ accountants, or (B) an equity
compensation plan of ICC Holdings and/or any material revisions thereto. This provision may have the effect of entrenching our board of directors and
management team and may deprive a shareholder of the opportunity to sell shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices. As a result,
other shareholders may be prevented from affecting matters involving our company, including:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
the composition of our board of directors and, through it, any determination with respect to our business direction and policies, including the
appointment and removal of officers;
any determinations with respect to mergers or other business combinations;
our acquisition or disposition of assets; and
our corporate financing activities.
~ 30 ~
Table of Contents
Furthermore, this concentration of voting power could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control or other business
combination that might otherwise be beneficial to our shareholders. This significant concentration of share ownership may also adversely affect the trading
price for our common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning stock in a company that is controlled by a small number of
shareholders.
In addition, these investors are restricted from buying or selling shares of our common stock pursuant to their respective investment agreements and, in
some cases, by restrictions under applicable securities laws. For three years following the closing, each of the investors are generally prohibited from
selling any shares of our common stock. Effective March 2020, the third anniversary of the closing date, subject to our right of first refusal in favor of us,
each investor is authorized to sell no more than six and one-quarter percent (6-1/4%) of the number of shares purchased at the closing of the offering every
ninety days. Upon the occurrence of a death or disability of R. Kevin Clinton, no more than six and one-quarter percent (6-1/4%) of the number of shares
purchased at the closing of the offering by R. Kevin Clinton and certain other purchasers who together purchased 800,000 shares of our common stock
every ninety days by their trusts, estate or spouse could be sold beginning, unless an earlier date has been approved by a majority of the members of our
board of directors other than R. Kevin Clinton or his replacement on our board of directors, (a) one year following such occurrence, if such event occurs
during the first year following the closing date, (b) six months following such occurrence, if such event occurs during the second year following the closing
date, or (c) following such occurrence, if such event occurs during the third year following the closing date. Until the expiration of the standstill provision
discussed below, each investor is restricted from buying any shares of our common stock other than those acquired pursuant to their respective investment
agreements and pursuant to their respective preemptive right thereunder. As a result, the liquidity of our common stock relative to what it would have been
had these shares been purchased by other investors may be reduced.
For so long as an investor beneficially owns two percent (2.0%) or more of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, these standstill
provisions will continue until the earliest of (a) the seventh anniversary of the closing of the offering, or (b) the date on which ICC Holdings includes a
balance sheet in a filing with the SEC in which its “adjusted shareholders’ equity” at the end of such fiscal quarter is less than 85% of the “starting
shareholders’ equity”. We received gross proceeds of $29.1 million in the offering, using information as of December 31, 2021 as the starting shareholders’
equity, the adjusted shareholders equity would have to be $9.5 million lower in order to trigger a termination of the standstill provisions. Following the
expiration of the standstill and other provisions, if these investors retain their ownership levels, such investors together may be able to exhibit significant
control over us and our management and will have significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, including future amendments to our
amended and restated articles of incorporation or other significant or extraordinary transactions. The interests of these investors may differ from the
interests of our other shareholders with respect to certain matters.
Our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and stock-based incentive plan will increase our costs, which will reduce our income.
As of December 31, 2021, our ESOP holds 10.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock, with such shares acquired with funds borrowed from us
prior to the expiration of our IPO. The cost of acquiring the shares of common stock for the ESOP, and therefore the amount of the loan, was $3.5 million.
The loan will be repaid over a fifteen year period. We record employee stock ownership plan expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the shares of
common stock committed to be released to employees under the ESOP for each year. If shares of our common stock appreciate in value over time,
compensation expense relating to the employee stock ownership plan will increase.
Our board of directors adopted a stock-based incentive plan that was submitted to, and approved by, our shareholders in 2017. Under this plan, we may
award participants restricted shares of our common stock, restricted stock units denominated in shares of our common stock, or options to purchase shares
of our common stock. Restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards will be made at no cost to the participants. Restricted stock units are payable in
shares of common stock or in cash in the discretion of the compensation committee. The number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to
restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards (to the extent that such restricted stock unit awards are not paid in cash) or upon exercise of stock option
awards under the stock-based incentive plan may not exceed 10% and 4%, respectively, of the total number of shares sold in the offering.
The costs associated with the grant of restricted stock awarded under the stock-based incentive plan will be recognized and expensed over the vesting
period of the award at the fair market value of the shares on the date they are awarded. The costs associated with the grant of restricted stock unit awards to
be settled in cash will similarly be recognized and expensed over their vesting period at the fair market value of the shares on the date they are awarded.
However, unlike awards of restricted stock, the fair market value will be remeasured on a quarterly basis until the award vests or is otherwise settled.
Therefore, in addition to reducing our net earnings by recording this compensation and benefit expense, increases in our stock price will increase this
expense for restricted stock unit awards settled in cash, thereby further reducing our net earnings.
~ 31 ~
Table of Contents
Finally, accounting rules require companies to recognize as compensation expense the award-date fair value of stock options. This compensation
expense will be recognized over the appropriate service period. When we record an expense for the award of options using the fair value method, we will
incur significant compensation and benefits expense, which will reduce our net earnings.
The valuation of our common stock in the initial public offering is not necessarily indicative of the future price of our common stock, and the price
of our common stock may decline.
There can be no assurance that shares of our common stock will be able to be sold in the market at or above the $10.00 per share initial offering price
in the future. The final aggregate purchase price of our common stock in the offering was based upon an independent appraisal. The appraisal is not
intended, and should not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing shares of common stock. The valuation is
based on estimates of a number of matters, all of which are subject to change from time to time. See “The Conversion and Offering — The Valuation” in
our final prospectus filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017 for the factors considered by Feldman Financial in determining the appraisal.
The price of shares of our common stock may decline for many reasons, some of which are beyond our control, including among others:
(cid:0) Capital market conditions generally;
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
quarterly variations in our results of operations;
changes in expectations as to our future results of operations, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;
announcements by third parties of claims against us;
changes in law and regulation;
results of operations that vary from those expected by investors; and
future sales of shares of our common stock.
In addition, the stock market routinely experiences substantial price and volume fluctuations that sometimes have been unrelated or disproportionate to
the operating performance of companies. As a result, the trading price of shares of our common stock may be below the initial public offering price, and a
shareholder may not be able to sell shares at or above the price paid to purchase them.
Statutory provisions and our articles and bylaws may discourage takeover attempts on the Company that shareholders may believe are in their
best interests or that might result in a substantial profit to them.
We are subject to provisions of Pennsylvania corporate law and Illinois insurance law that hinder a change of control. Illinois law requires the Illinois
Department of Insurance’s prior approval of a change of control of an insurance holding company. Under Illinois law, the acquisition of 10% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of an insurer or its holding company is presumed to be a change in control. Approval by the Illinois Department of Insurance may
be withheld even if the transaction would be in the shareholders’ best interest if the Illinois Department of Insurance determines that the transaction would
be detrimental to policyholders.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws also contain provisions that may discourage a change in control. These provisions include:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
a prohibition on a person, including a group acting in concert, from acquiring voting control of more than 10% of our outstanding stock without
prior approval of the board of directors;
a classified board of directors divided into three classes serving for successive terms of three years each;
the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors;
the requirement that nominations for the election of directors made by shareholders and any shareholder proposals for inclusion on the agenda at
any annual meeting must be made by notice (in writing) delivered or mailed to us not less than 90 days prior to the meeting;
the prohibition of shareholders’ action without a meeting and of shareholders’ right to call a special meeting;
unless otherwise waived by the board of directors, to be elected as a director, a person must be a shareholder of ICC Holdings, Inc. for the lesser of
one year or the time that has elapsed since the completion of the conversion;
the requirement imposing a mandatory tender offering requirement on a shareholder that has a combined voting power of 25% or more of the
votes that our shareholders are entitled to cast;
~ 32 ~
Table of Contents
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
the requirement that certain provisions of our articles of incorporation can only be amended by an affirmative vote of shareholders entitled to cast
at least 80% of all votes that shareholders are entitled to cast, unless approved by an affirmative vote of at least 80% of the members of the board
of directors; and
the requirement that certain provisions of our bylaws can only be amended by an affirmative vote of shareholders entitled to cast at least 66 2/3%,
or in certain cases 80%, of all votes that shareholders are entitled to cast.
These provisions may serve to entrench management and may discourage a takeover attempt that a shareholder may consider to be in his or her best
interest or in which the shareholder would receive a substantial premium over the current market price. These provisions may make it extremely difficult
for any one person, entity or group of affiliated persons or entities to acquire voting control of the Company, with the result that it may be extremely
difficult to bring about a change in the board of directors or management. Some of these provisions also may perpetuate present management because of
the additional time required to cause a change in the control of the board. Other provisions make it difficult for shareholders owning less than a majority of
the voting stock to be able to elect even a single director.
If ICC is not sufficiently profitable, our ability to pay dividends will be limited.
We are a separate entity with no operations of our own other than holding the stock of ICC; ICC Realty, LLC; Beverage Insurance Agency, Inc; and
Estrella Innovative Solutions, Inc. We depend primarily on dividends paid by ICC, distributions from ICC Realty, LLC, and any proceeds from the offering
that are not contributed to ICC to pay the debt service on our existing loans and to provide funds for the payment of dividends. We will receive dividends
only after all of ICC’s obligations and regulatory requirements with the Illinois Department of Insurance have been satisfied. During any twelve-month
period, the amount of dividends paid by ICC to us, without the prior approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance, may not exceed the greater of 10% of
ICC’s surplus as regards policyholders as reported on its most recent annual statement filed with the Illinois Department of Insurance or ICC’s statutory net
income as reported on such statement. We presently do not intend to pay dividends to our shareholders. If ICC is not sufficiently profitable, our ability to
pay dividends in the future will be limited.
Ongoing compliance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could result in higher operating costs and
adversely affect our results of operations.
With the completion of our initial public offering, we are now subject to the periodic reporting, proxy solicitation, insider trading prohibitions and
other obligations imposed under the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, certain of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act became applicable to us at
the completion of the offering. Compliance with these requirements will increase our legal, accounting and other compliance costs and the cost of directors
and officer’s liability insurance, and will require management to devote substantial time and effort to ensure initial and ongoing compliance with these
obligations. A key component of compliance under the Exchange Act is to produce quarterly and annual financial reports within prescribed time periods
after the close of our fiscal year and each fiscal quarter. Historically, we have not been required to prepare such financial reports within these time periods.
Failure to satisfy these reporting requirements may result in delisting of our common stock by the NASDAQ Capital Market, and inquiries from or
sanctions by the SEC. Moreover, the provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that requires public companies to review and report on the adequacy of their
internal controls over financial reporting may be applicable to us in 2022. We expect these rules, regulations and requirements to significantly increase our
accounting, legal, compliance and other costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We also may need to hire additional
accounting, legal, compliance and administrative staff with experience working for public companies. We may be unable to hire such additional staff on
terms that are favorable to us, or at all. In addition, such additional staff may not be able to provide such services at levels sufficient to comply with these
requirements. Moreover, the rules that became applicable to us as a public company could make it more difficult and expensive for us to attract and retain
qualified members of our board of directors and qualified executive officers. We also anticipate that these rules will make it more expensive for us to obtain
directors’ and officers’ insurance, and we may be required to incur substantially higher costs to obtain such coverage. If we fail to predict these costs
accurately or to manage these costs effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected.
Our high price-to-earnings ratio may cause our stock to trade at less than $10 per share in the secondary market obtained in the offering.
Because of our relatively low returns on equity in recent reporting periods, the price-to-earnings ratio of our shares may be substantially higher than
our peers. This may result in our shares trading in the secondary market at less than the $10 per share offering price.
~ 33 ~
Table of Contents
If we fail to maintain the necessary requirements to be listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market, the price and liquidity of our stock may be
adversely affected.
In order to remain listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market, we must meet certain minimum requirements for our shareholders’ equity, net earnings, the
market value and number of publicly held shares, the number of shareholders, and the market price of our stock. In addition, we must have up to four
market makers making a market in our stock under certain continued listing standards. Delisting from the NASDAQ Capital Market may adversely affect
the market price for our stock and reduce the liquidity of our common stock, and therefore, make it more difficult for a shareholder to sell our stock. For
more information regarding the reduced liquidity as a result of our agreements with the investors, see Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to the
Ownership of Our Common Stock — A small number of shareholders will collectively own a substantial portion of our common stock and voting power,
and, because of restrictions on their ability to buy or sell our shares, our public float will be limited.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of
operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the U.S. and global economy; disrupted U.S. and global supply chains; lowered equity market
valuations; created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets; contributed to a decrease in the rates and yields on U.S. Treasury securities;
resulted in ratings downgrades, credit deterioration, and defaults in many industries; increased demands on capital and liquidity; and increased
unemployment levels and decreased consumer confidence. In addition, the pandemic has resulted in temporary closures of many businesses, especially
bars and restaurants, and the institution of social distancing and sheltering in place requirements in many states and communities, including those in our
footprint. The pandemic has caused us, and could continue to cause us, to recognize losses in our investment portfolios and increases in our allowance for
losses. Furthermore, the pandemic could cause us to recognize impairment of our financial assets. Sustained adverse effects may also increase our cost of
capital, prevent us from satisfying our minimum regulatory capital and surplus, or result in downgrades in our A.M. Best ratings. The extent to which the
COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly
uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic, the continued effectiveness of our business continuity plan, the direct
and indirect impact of the pandemic on our customers, colleagues, counterparties and service providers, and actions taken by governmental authorities and
other third parties in response to the pandemic.
Governmental authorities have taken significant measures to provide economic assistance to individual households and businesses, stabilize the
markets, and support economic growth. The success of these measures is unknown, and they may not be sufficient to fully mitigate the negative impact of
the pandemic. Additionally, some measures, such as a suspension of insurance premium payments and the reduction in interest rates to near zero, may have
a negative impact on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. We also may become subject to legislative and/or regulatory
action that retroactively mandates coverage for losses that our insurance policies were not intended or priced to cover, including business interruption
claims, despite terms included in our policies to preclude coverage or that creates presumptions of compensability not otherwise present (including for
example in workers’ compensations exposures). Regulatory requirements could also impact pricing, risk selection and our rights and obligations with
respect to our policies and insureds, including our ability to cancel policies, collect premiums, or requiring us to refund premiums in a manner not
otherwise required. We also face an increased risk of litigation and governmental and regulatory scrutiny as a result of the effects of the pandemic on
market and economic conditions and actions governmental authorities take in response to those conditions. These potential exposures include direct claims
relating to COVID-19 (e.g., business interruption following a shelter in place order) and indirect exposures arising from an economic downturn.
The length of the pandemic and the effectiveness of the measures put in place to address it are unknown. Until the effects of the pandemic subside, we
could experience reduced revenues in our businesses. To the extent the pandemic adversely affects our business, financial condition, liquidity, or results of
operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section and any subsequent Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q.
~ 34 ~
Table of Contents
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our headquarters are located at 225 20th Street, Rock Island, Illinois. We own this approximately 24,000 square foot facility. We also own and operate
investment property comprising of one storage facility in Davenport, Iowa and 52 rental units consisting of duplexes, condos, senior living units, and a
seven-plex property. These rentals are located in Colona, Illinois; East Moline, Illinois; Kissimmee, Florida; Milan, Illinois; Moline, Illinois; Rock Island,
Illinois; Silvis, Illinois; and Le Claire, Iowa. In addition, we own and operate twelve single-family homes located in Colona, Illinois; East Moline, Illinois;
Rock Island, Illinois; and Silvis, Illinois.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to litigation in the normal course of business. Based upon information presently available to us, we do not consider any litigation to be
material. However, given the uncertainties attendant to litigation, we cannot provide assurance that our results of operations and financial condition will not
be materially adversely affected by any litigation.
~ 35 ~
Table of Contents
Item 3A. Forward-Looking Information
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf
of ICC Holdings, Inc. ICC Holdings, Inc. and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or verbal forward-looking statements, including
statements contained in ICC Holdings, Inc.'s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its reports to shareholders. Generally, the
inclusion of the words “anticipates,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “plans,” “seek”, “will,” or the negative of such
terms and similar expressions identify statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections.
All statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments that ICC Holdings, Inc. expects or anticipates will occur in the future, including
statements relating to sales growth, earnings or earnings per share growth, and market share, as well as statements expressing optimism or pessimism about
future operating results, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. The forward-looking statements are and will be based on
management’s then-current beliefs and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance and on information currently available to
management, and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other things, the factors discussed under the heading “Item
1A. Risk Factors” and those listed below. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so,
we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of
uncertainties and risks, including the risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other unforeseen risks. Readers should not put undue reliance
on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, even if subsequently made available
by us on our website or otherwise, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the
date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
All of these factors are difficult to predict and many are beyond our control. These important factors include those discussed under Item 1A. Risk
Factors and those listed below
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
the potential impact of fraud, operational errors, systems malfunctions, or cybersecurity incidents;
future economic conditions in the markets in which we compete that are less favorable than expected;
our ability to expand geographically;
the effects of weather-related and other catastrophic events;
the effect of legislative, judicial, economic, demographic and regulatory events in the jurisdictions where we do business, especially changes with
respect to laws, regulations and judicial decisions relating to liquor liability;
our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities either through acquisitions or the expansion of our producer
network;
the impacts of negative social media and the cancel culture;
financial market conditions, including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates and the stock markets causing a reduction of investment income
or investment gains and a reduction in the value of our investment portfolio;
heightened competition, including specifically the intensification of price competition, the entry of new competitors and the development of new
products by new or existing competitors, resulting in a reduction in the demand for our products;
the impact of acts of terrorism and acts of war;
the effects of terrorist related insurance legislation and laws;
changes in general economic conditions, including inflation, unemployment, interest rates and other factors;
the cost, availability and collectability of reinsurance;
estimates and adequacy of loss reserves and trends in loss and settlement expenses;
changes in the coverage terms selected by insurance customers, including higher limits;
our inability to obtain regulatory approval of, or to implement, premium rate increases;
our ability to obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable prices or on terms that adequately protect us;
the potential impact on our reported net earnings that could result from the adoption of future auditing or accounting standards issued by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board or the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard-setting bodies;
unanticipated changes in industry trends and ratings assigned by nationally recognized rating organizations;
~ 36 ~
Table of Contents
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
adverse litigation or arbitration results; and
adverse changes in applicable laws, regulations or rules governing insurance holding companies and insurance companies, and environmental, tax
or accounting matters including limitations on premium levels, increases in minimum capital and reserves, and other financial viability
requirements, and changes that affect the cost of, or demand for our products.
Because forward-looking information is subject to various risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from that expressed or implied by the
forward-looking information.
ALL SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN AND ORAL FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION ATTRIBUTABLE TO ICC HOLDINGS, INC OR ANY
PERSON ACTING ON OUR BEHALF IS EXPRESSLY QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONTAINED OR
REFERRED TO IN THIS SECTION.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
~ 37 ~
Table of Contents
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In March 2017, the Company completed its IPO. The Company’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ICCH.”
As of March 10, 2022, there were approximately 139 registered holders of the Company’s common stock. A substantially greater number of holders of the
Company's common stock are "street name" or beneficial holders, whose shares of record are held by banks, brokers, and other financial institutions.
The following table provides information related to equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2021:
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security
holders
Total
Number of Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants, and Rights (a)
Weighted-average Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights (b)
Number of Securities Remaining for Future
Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
(excluding securities reflected in column
(a)) (c)
46,111
—
46,111
—(1)
—
—
432,189
—
432,189
(1)All awards under the ICC Holdings, Inc. Executive Discretionary Bonus Program are in the form of restricted stock units. Accordingly, they were not included in calculating the weight-
average exercise price because shares of common stock will be issued for no consideration.
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we have certain restrictions from doing so under Pennsylvania and
Illinois law. For more information, see Item 1. Business – Regulation – Dividends. We currently intend to retain any earnings for future growth and,
therefore, do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
~ 38 ~
Table of Contents
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table summarizes repurchases of common stock pursuant to share repurchase programs authorized by the Board of Directors.
Period
October 1 – October 31, 2021
November 1 – November 30, 2021
December 1 – December 31, 2021
Total
Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Total number of
shares (or units)
purchased
(b) Average price paid per
share (or unit)
664 $
1,109
336
2,109 $
16.87
16.98
17.04
16.86
(c) Total number of
shares (or units)
purchased as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs
(d) Maximum number (or
approximate dollar value)
of shares (or units) that
may be purchased under
the plans or programs (1)
2,673,581
2,654,750
2,649,025
664 $
1,109 $
336 $
2,109
(1)
In August 2018, the Company announced the establishment of a $3.0 million share repurchase program, for each year
respectively, with no expiration date. The authorization is in addition to the existing share repurchase program.
~ 39 ~
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not applicable. The financial disclosures made available within this Form 10-K are meant to compare the fiscal periods ended December 31, 2021 and
December 31, 2020. Financial information for prior periods can be found in the corresponding, previously filed Form 10-K and Form 10-Q’s.
~ 40 ~
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in
this Form 10-K constitutes forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Please see Item 3A. Forward-Looking Information and Item
1A. Risk Factors for more information. Please see Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the results described, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained herein.
Overview
ICC is a regional property and casualty insurance company incorporated in Illinois and focused exclusively on the food and beverage industry. On the
effective date of the conversion, ICC became a wholly owned subsidiary of ICC Holdings, Inc.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had direct written premiums of $71.1 million, net premiums earned of $53.9 million, and net earnings of
$4.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we had direct premiums written of $59.0 million, net premiums earned of $49.7 million, and net
earnings of $3.5 million. At December 31, 2021, we had total assets of $200.0 million and equity of $74.7 million. At December 31, 2020, we had total
assets of $183.9 million and equity of $72.7 million.
We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting
requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to: not required to comply
with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our
periodic reports and proxy statements; exemptions from the requirements of holding an annual non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and
nonbinding stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period
provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth
company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have taken
advantage of the extended transition period provided by Section 107 of the JOBS Act. We decided to comply with the effective dates for financial
accounting standards applicable to emerging growth companies at a later date in compliance with the requirements in Sections 107(b)(2) and (3) of the
JOBS Act. Such decision is irrevocable.
Principal Revenue and Expense Items
We derive our revenue primarily from premiums earned, net investment income and net realized gains (losses) from investments.
Gross and net premiums written
Gross premiums written is equal to direct and assumed premiums before the effect of ceded reinsurance. Net premiums written is the difference
between gross premiums written and premiums ceded or paid to reinsurers (ceded premiums written).
Premiums earned
Premiums earned is the earned portion of our net premiums written. Gross premiums written include all premiums recorded by an insurance company
during a specified policy period. Insurance premiums on property and casualty insurance contracts are recognized in proportion to the underlying risk
insured and are earned ratably over the duration of the policies. At the end of each accounting period, the portion of the premiums that is not yet earned is
included in unearned premiums and is realized as revenue in subsequent periods over the remaining term of the policy. Our policies typically have a term of
twelve months. Thus, for example, for a policy that is written on July 1, 2021, one-half of the premiums would be earned in 2021 and the other half would
be earned in 2022.
~ 41 ~
Table of Contents
Net investment income and net realized gains (losses) on investments
We invest our surplus and the funds supporting our insurance liabilities (including unearned premiums and unpaid loss and settlement expenses) in
cash, cash equivalents, equities, fixed maturity securities and real estate. Investment income includes interest and dividends earned on invested assets. Net
realized gains and losses on invested assets are reported separately from net investment income. We recognize realized gains when invested assets are sold
for an amount greater than their cost or amortized cost (in the case of fixed maturity securities) and recognize realized losses when investment securities are
written down as a result of an other than temporary impairment or sold for an amount less than their cost or amortized cost, as applicable. Our portfolio of
investment securities is managed by two independent third parties with managers specializing in the insurance industry.
ICC’s expenses consist primarily of:
Loss and settlement expenses
Loss and settlement expenses represent the largest expense item and include: (1) claim payments made, (2) estimates for future claim payments and
changes in those estimates from prior periods, and (3) costs associated with investigating, defending and adjusting claims.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses
Expenses incurred to underwrite risks are referred to as policy acquisition expenses. Variable policy acquisition costs consist of commission expenses,
premium taxes and certain other underwriting expenses that vary with, and are primarily related to, the writing and acquisition of new and renewal
business. These policy acquisition costs are deferred and amortized over the effective period of the related insurance policies. Fixed policy acquisition
costs, referred to herein as underwriting and administrative expenses are expensed as incurred. These costs include salaries, rent, office supplies, and
depreciation. Other operating expenses consist primarily of information technology costs, accounting and internal control salaries, as well as audit and legal
expenses.
Income taxes
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes arise from the recognition of temporary differences
between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than
not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period of the enactment date.
Key Financial Measures
We evaluate our insurance operations by monitoring certain key measures of growth and profitability. In addition to reviewing our financial
performance based on results determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), we utilize certain non-
GAAP financial measures that we believe are valuable in managing our business and for comparison to our peers. These non-GAAP measures are
combined ratio, written premiums, underwriting income, the loss and settlement expense ratio, the expense ratio, the ratio of net written premiums to
statutory surplus and return on average equity.
We measure growth by monitoring changes in gross premiums written and net premiums written. We measure underwriting profitability by examining
losses and settlement expenses, underwriting expenses and combined ratios. We also measure profitability by examining underwriting income (loss) and
net earnings (loss).
Loss and settlement expense ratio
The loss and settlement expense ratio is the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of loss and settlement expenses incurred to premiums earned. We measure
the loss ratio on an accident year and calendar year loss basis to monitor underwriting profitability. An accident year loss ratio measures loss and settlement
expenses for insured events occurring in a particular year, regardless of when they are reported, as a percentage of premiums earned during that year. A
calendar year loss ratio measures loss and settlement expense for insured events occurring during a particular year and the change in loss reserves from
prior accident years as a percentage of premiums earned during that year.
~ 42 ~
Table of Contents
Expense ratio
The underwriting expense ratio is the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and other operating
expenses to net premiums earned, and measures our operational efficiency in producing, underwriting and administering our insurance business.
GAAP combined ratio
Our GAAP combined ratio is the sum of the loss and settlement expense ratio and the expense ratio and measures our overall underwriting profit. If the
GAAP combined ratio is below 100%, we are making an underwriting profit. If our combined ratio is at or above 100%, we are not profitable without
investment income and may not be profitable if investment income is insufficient.
Net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio
The net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio represents the ratio of net premiums written, after reinsurance ceded, to statutory surplus. This ratio
measures our exposure to pricing errors in our current book of business. The higher the ratio, the greater the impact on surplus should pricing prove
inadequate.
Underwriting income (loss)
Underwriting income (loss) measures the pre-tax profitability of our insurance operations. It is derived by subtracting loss and settlement expense,
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, and underwriting and administrative expenses from earned premiums. Each of these items is presented as
a caption in our statements of earnings.
Net earnings (loss) and return on average equity
We use net earnings (loss) to measure our profit and return on average equity to measure our effectiveness in utilizing equity to generate net earnings.
In determining return on average equity for a given year, net earnings (loss) is divided by the average of the beginning and ending equity for that year.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires both the use of estimates and judgment relative to the application of
appropriate accounting policies. We are required to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in our financial
statements and related footnotes. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an on-going basis based on historical developments, market conditions,
industry trends and other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will conform
to our estimates and assumptions and that reported results of operations will not be materially adversely affected by the need to make accounting
adjustments to reflect changes in these estimates and assumptions from time to time. We believe the following policies are the most sensitive to estimates
and judgments.
Investments
Available-for-Sale Securities—Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale (AFS) and reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these
securities are excluded from net earnings but are recorded as a separate component of comprehensive earnings and policyholders’ equity, net of deferred
income taxes.
Equity Securities—Equity securities include common stock, mutual funds, and non-redeemable preferred stock. Equity securities are carried at fair
value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in net earnings.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment—Under current accounting standards, an OTTI write-down of debt securities, where fair value is below amortized
cost, is triggered by circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security, (2) it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity
intends to sell a security or if it is more likely than not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in
earnings equal to the difference between the security’s amortized cost and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more
likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss,
which is recognized in earnings, and the amount related to all other
~ 43 ~
Table of Contents
factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. Impairment losses result in a reduction of the underlying investment’s cost basis.
The Company regularly evaluates its fixed income securities using both quantitative and qualitative criteria to determine impairment losses for other-
than-temporary declines in the fair value of the investments. The following are the key factors for determining if a security is other-than-temporarily
impaired:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
The extent to which the fair value is less than cost,
The assessment of significant adverse changes to the cash flows on a fixed income investment,
The occurrence of a discrete credit event resulting in the issuer defaulting on a material obligation, the issuer seeking protection from creditors
under the bankruptcy laws, the issuer proposing a voluntary reorganization under which creditors are asked to exchange their claims for cash or
securities having a fair value substantially lower than par value,
The probability that the Company will recover the entire amortized cost basis of the fixed income securities prior to maturity, or
The ability and intent to hold fixed income securities until maturity.
Quantitative and qualitative criteria are considered during this process to varying degrees depending on the sector the analysis is being performed:
Corporates—The Company performs a qualitative evaluation of holdings that fall below the price threshold. The analysis begins with an opinion of
industry and competitive position. This includes an assessment of factors that enable the profit structure of the business (e.g., reserve profile for exploration
and production companies), competitive advantage (e.g., distribution system), management strategy, and an analysis of trends in return on invested capital.
Analysts may also review other factors to determine whether an impairment exists including liquidity, asset value cash flow generation, and industry
multiples.
Municipals—The Company analyzes the screened impairment candidates on a quantitative and qualitative basis. This includes an assessment of the
factors that may be contributing to the unrealized loss and whether the recovery value is greater or less than current market value.
Structured Securities—The “stated assumptions” analytic approach relies on actual 6-month average collateral performance measures (voluntary
prepayment rate, gross default rate, and loss severity) sourced through third party data providers or remittance reports. The analysis applies the stated
assumptions throughout the remaining term of the transaction using forecasted cash flows, which are then applied through the transaction structure
(reflecting the priority of payments and performance triggers) to determine whether there is a loss to the security (“Loss to Tranche”). For securities or
sectors for which no actual loss or minimal loss has been observed (certain Prime Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) and Commercial
Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS), for example), sector-based assumptions are applied or an alternative quantitative or qualitative analysis is performed.
Property Held for Investment—Property held for investment purposes is initially recorded at the purchase price, which is generally fair value, and is
subsequently reported at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings are depreciated on a straight-line bases over the estimated useful lives of the
building, which we estimate to be 39 years. Income from property held for investment is reported as net investment income
Investment Income—Interest on fixed maturities and short-term investments is credited to earnings on an accrual basis. Premiums and discounts are
amortized or accreted over the lives of the related fixed maturities. Dividends on equity securities are credited to earnings on the ex-dividend date. Realized
gains and losses on disposition of investments are based on specific identification of the investments sold on the settlement date, which does not differ
significantly from trade date accounting.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash consists of uninvested balances in bank accounts. Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of 90 days or less, primarily
AAA-rated prime and government money market funds. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company has not
experienced losses on these instruments.
~ 44 ~
Table of Contents
Loss and Settlement Expense Reserves
We maintain reserves for the payment of claims (incurred losses) and expenses related to adjusting those claims (loss settlement expenses). Our loss
reserves consist of case reserves, which are reserves for claims that have been reported to us, loss settlement expense reserve, which includes all defense
and litigation-related expenses, whether internal or external to us, and reserves for claims that have been incurred but have not yet been reported or for case
reserve deficiencies or redundancies (IBNR).
When a claim is reported to us, our claims personnel establish a case reserve for the estimated amount of the ultimate payment. The amount of the loss
reserve for the reported claim is based primarily upon a claim-by-claim evaluation of coverage, liability, injury severity or scope of property damage, and
any other information considered pertinent to estimating the exposure presented by the claim. Each claim is settled individually based upon its merits, and
some claims may take years to settle, especially if legal action is involved. Case reserves are reviewed on a regular basis and are updated as new data
becomes available.
In addition to case reserves, we maintain an estimate of reserves for loss and settlement expenses incurred but not reported. Some claims may not be
reported for several years. As a result, the liability for unpaid loss and settlement expense reserves includes significant estimates for IBNR.
We utilize an independent actuary to assist with the estimation of our loss and settlement expense reserves bi-annually. This actuary prepares estimates
of the ultimate liability for unpaid losses and settlement expenses based on established actuarial methods described below. Our management reviews these
estimates and supplements the actuarial analysis with information not fully incorporated into the actuarially based estimate, such as changes in the external
business environment and changes in internal company processes and strategy. We may adjust the actuarial estimates based on this supplemental
information in order to arrive at the amount recorded in the financial statements.
Reserving Methods
In developing our loss and settlement expense reserve estimates, we relied upon widely used and accepted loss reserving methods (described below).
Based on the deemed predictive qualities of each of the applied methods, we selected estimated ultimates by year in order to determine our reserve
estimates. Our estimates can be considered actuarial central estimates, which means that they represent an expected value over the range of reasonably
possible outcomes.
Loss Development Methods (Paid and Incurred Loss and Settlement Expense) - Loss development ultimates are determined by multiplying current
reported values by cumulative loss development factors. Incremental loss development factors are determined by analyzing historical development of
losses and assuming that future development will mimic historical. Cumulative development factors are calculated from the selection of incremental
factors.
This method is also applied to incurred settlement expense to incurred loss ratios and paid settlement expense to paid loss ratios to estimate ultimate
settlement expense.
Loss development methods are particularly appropriate when historical loss development patterns have been relatively stable and can be predicted with
reasonable accuracy.
Expected Loss Ratio Method - The expected loss ratio method applies a selected ultimate loss ratio to premium to determine ultimate losses and
settlement expenses. Expected loss ratios for 2007 and prior were selected based on the results of the loss development methods discussed above, industry
experience, actual loss experience of ICC to date and general industry conditions. Beginning with 2008, expected loss ratios have been calculated based on
the prior expected loss ratios, rate changes and loss trend.
Bornhuetter-Ferguson (B-F) Methods (Paid and Incurred Loss) - The Loss Development Methods rely heavily on data as of the most recent evaluation
date, and a relatively small swing in early reported (or paid) losses may result in a large swing in the ultimate loss projections. Therefore, other methods
may also be considered.
The B-F Methods offer a blend of stability and responsiveness by estimating ultimate losses as a weighted combination of an expected loss estimate
and current loss data. The weight applied to the expected loss estimate is based on the appropriate cumulative loss development factor from the Loss
Development Methods. This percentage is multiplied by expected losses to determine expected future development. This estimate of future loss
development is then added to losses as of the current evaluation date to project ultimate losses.
~ 45 ~
Table of Contents
A&OE Method - In 2012, we implemented a new approach to reserving for unpaid Adjusting & Other Expenses (A&OE). This method is referred to as
the “Wendy Johnson Method” where historical A&OE payments are measured against certain claim units to develop an average rate for projecting into
future years. These claim units are defined as a means of measuring the overall level of claim activity in a year as follows:
Units =
2 x (Newly Reported Claims in Year X) +
(Number of Claims Open at Start of Year X)
Future A&OE costs are projected by inflating the selected average A&OE per unit rate, 1.0% annually, against future units calculated by claims runoff
patterns.
Range of Estimates
In addition to our actuarial central estimate, we have also developed a range of estimates. This range is not designed to represent minimum or
maximum possible outcomes. It is developed to represent low and high ends for a reasonable range of expected outcomes given the selection of alternative,
but reasonable assumptions. Actual results may fall outside of this range.
High and low net reserve estimates were developed by stressing our expected loss ratio and loss development factor selections. By applying a factor to
increase (and decrease) these assumptions, we developed high (and low) ultimate loss and settlement expense estimates. These estimates, along with paid
and incurred loss information, result in a range of reserves. The gross reserve range is based on selected percentages which produce a range which is
slightly wider than the net range.
We estimate IBNR reserves by first deriving an actuarially based estimate of the ultimate cost of total loss and settlement expenses incurred by line of
business as of the financial statement date. We then reduce the estimated ultimate loss and settlement expenses by loss and settlement expense payments
and case reserves carried as of the financial statement date. The actuarially determined estimate is based upon indications from one of the above actuarial
methodologies or uses a weighted average of these results. The specific method used to estimate the ultimate losses for individual lines of business, or
individual accident years within a line of business, will vary depending on the judgment of the actuary as to what is the most appropriate method for a line
of business’ unique characteristics. Finally, we consider other factors that impact reserves that are not fully incorporated in the actuarially based estimate,
such as changes in the external business environment and changes in internal company processes and strategy.
The process of estimating loss reserves involves a high degree of judgment and is subject to a number of variables. These variables can be affected by
both internal and external events, such as changes in claims handling procedures, economic inflation, legal trends, and legislative changes, among others.
The impact of many of these items on ultimate costs for claims and claim adjustment expenses is difficult to estimate. Loss reserve estimation difficulties
also differ significantly by line of business due to differences in claim complexity, the volume of claims, the potential severity of individual claims, the
determination of occurrence date for a claim, and reporting lags (the time between the occurrence of the policyholder event and when it is actually reported
to the insurer). Informed judgment is applied throughout the process, including the application of various individual experiences and expertise to multiple
sets of data and analyses. We continually refine our loss reserve estimates in a regular ongoing process as historical loss experience develops and additional
claims are reported and settled. We consider all significant facts and circumstances known at the time loss reserves are established.
Due to the inherent uncertainty underlying loss reserve estimates, final resolution of the estimated liability for loss and settlement expenses may be
higher or lower than the related loss reserves at the reporting date. Therefore, actual paid losses, as claims are settled in the future, may be materially higher
or lower in amount than current loss reserves. We reflect adjustments to loss reserves in the results of operations in the period the estimates are changed.
We accrue liabilities for unpaid loss and settlement expenses based upon estimates of the ultimate amount payable.
Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Operating Expenses
The Company defers commissions, premium taxes, and certain other costs that are incrementally or directly related to the successful acquisition of new
or renewal insurance contracts. Acquisition-related costs may be deemed ineligible for deferral when they are based on contingent or performance criteria
beyond the basic acquisition of the insurance contract or when efforts to obtain or renew the insurance contract are unsuccessful. All eligible costs are
capitalized and charged to expense in proportion to premium revenue recognized. The method followed in computing deferred policy acquisition costs
limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value. This deferral methodology applies to both gross and ceded premiums and
acquisition costs. Other operating expenses consist primarily of information technology costs, accounting and internal control salaries, as well as audit and
legal expenses.
~ 46 ~
Table of Contents
Premiums
Premiums are recognized ratably over the term of the contracts, net of ceded reinsurance. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums
written relative to the unexpired terms of coverage. Unearned premiums are calculated on a daily pro rata basis.
Reinsurance
Ceded unearned premiums and reinsurance balances recoverable on paid and unpaid losses and settlement expenses are reported separately as assets
instead of being netted with the related liabilities, since reinsurance does not relieve us of our legal liability to our policyholders.
Quarterly, the Company monitors the financial condition of its reinsurers. The Company’s monitoring efforts include, but are not limited to, the review
of annual summarized financial data and analysis of the credit risk associated with reinsurance balances recoverable by monitoring the A.M. Best and
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) ratings. In addition, the Company subjects its reinsurance recoverables to detailed recoverable tests, including an analysis based
on average default by A.M. Best rating. Based upon the review and testing, the Company’s policy is to charge to earnings, in the form of an allowance, an
estimate of unrecoverable amounts from reinsurers. This allowance is reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that the amount makes a reasonable provision
for reinsurance balances that the Company may be unable to recover.
Income Taxes
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Federal income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method under which
deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years
to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, operating losses and tax credit carry
forwards. The effect on deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets
are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not all or some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company considers uncertainties in income taxes and recognizes those in its financial statements as required. As it relates to uncertainties in
income taxes, unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalty accruals, are not considered material to the consolidated financial statements. Also,
no tax uncertainties are expected to result in significant increases or decreases to unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12-month period. Penalties and
interest related to income tax uncertainties, should they occur, would be included in income tax expense in the period in which they are incurred.
As an insurance company, the Company is subject to minimal state income tax liabilities. On a state basis, since the majority of income is from
insurance operations, the Company pays premium taxes in lieu of state income tax. Premium taxes are a component of policy acquisition costs and
calculated as a percentage of gross premiums written.
Comprehensive Earnings
Comprehensive earnings include net earnings plus unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities, net of tax. In reporting the components of
comprehensive earnings on a net basis in the statement of earnings, the Company used a 21% tax rate for 2021 and 2020.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations are influenced by factors affecting the property and casualty insurance industry in general. The operating results of the United
States property and casualty insurance industry are subject to significant variations due to competition, weather, catastrophic events, regulation, general
economic conditions, judicial trends, fluctuations in interest rates and other changes in the investment environment.
Our premium growth and underwriting results have been, and continue to be, influenced by market conditions. Pricing in the property and casualty
insurance industry historically has been cyclical. During a soft market cycle, price competition is more significant than during a hard market cycle and
makes it difficult to attract and retain properly priced commercial business. A hard market typically has a positive effect on premium growth.
~ 47 ~
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our results for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.
Premiums
Direct premiums written grew by $12,110,000, or 20.5%, primarily due to our insureds’ businesses being open substantially all year long in 2021 in
contrast to business closures brought on by COVID-19 in 2020, and net written premium increased by $11,163,000, or 22.8%, during the same period. Net
premiums earned grew by $4,204,000, or 8.5%.
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we ceded to reinsurers $10,854,000 and $10,080,000 of earned premiums, respectively. Ceded
earned premiums as a percent of direct premiums written were 15.3% in 2021, and 17.1% in 2020.
Premiums are earned ratably over the term of the policy whereas written premiums are reflected on the effective date of the policy.
Other income
Other income is derived from policies we write and represents additional charges to policyholders for services outside of the premium charge, such as
installment billing or policy issuance costs. Another component of other income is attributable to sales made by the Company’s subsidiary, Katkin. Other
income increased by $580,000, or 251.1%, in 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily as a result of a decrease in premiums written off and the addition of
Katkin in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Unpaid Losses and Settlement Expenses
The following table details our unpaid losses and settlement expenses.
(In thousands)
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - beginning of the period:
Gross
Less: Ceded
Net
Increase in incurred losses and settlement expense:
Current year
Prior years
Total incurred
Deduct: Loss and settlement expense payments for claims incurred:
Current year
Prior years
Total paid
Net unpaid losses and settlement expense - end of the period
Plus: Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
Gross unpaid losses and settlement expense - end of the period
2021
2020
61,576 $
13,020
48,556
33,968
732
34,700
14,740
21,203
35,943
47,314
14,521
61,835 $
56,838
11,036
45,802
31,356
1,206
32,562
13,054
16,754
29,808
48,556
13,020
61,576
$
$
Differences from the initial reserve estimates emerged as changes in the ultimate loss estimates were updated through the reserve analysis process. The
recognition of the changes in initial reserve estimates occurred over time as claims were reported, initial case reserves were established, initial reserves
were reviewed in light of additional information and ultimate payments were made on the collective set of claims incurred as of that evaluation date. The
new information on the ultimate settlement value of claims is updated until all claims in a defined set are settled. As a small specialty insurer with a niche
product portfolio, our experience will ordinarily exhibit fluctuations from period to period. While management attempts to identify and react to systematic
changes in the loss environment, management must also consider the volume of experience directly available to the Company and interpret any particular
period’s indications with a realistic technical understanding of the reliability of those observations.
~ 48 ~
Table of Contents
For calendar year 2021, the Company experienced unfavorable development relative to prior years’ reserve estimates in both its property and liability
lines of business relating to Businessowners Property 2020 accident year claims and Businessowners Liability 2017 accident year claims, respectively.
These adverse developments were largely offset by favorable development in Workers’ Compensation 2020 accident year claims.
For calendar year 2020, the Company experienced unfavorable development relative to prior years’ reserve estimates in both its property and liability
lines of business relating to Businessowners Property 2019 accident year claims and Businessowners Liability 2016 accident year claims, respectively.
These adverse developments were largely offset by favorable development in Liquor Liability.
Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Operating Expenses and the Expense Ratio
Policy acquisition costs are costs we incur to issue policies, which include commissions, premium taxes, underwriting reports, and underwriter
compensation costs. The Company offsets the direct commissions it pays with ceded commissions it receives from reinsurers. Other operating expenses
consist primarily of information technology costs, accounting and internal control salaries, as well as audit and legal expenses. Policy acquisition costs and
other operating expenses increased by $2,295,000, or 12.4%. The primary drivers for this change were an increase in commissions along with positive
earned premium growth.
Our expense ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of policy acquisition costs and operating expenses by net earned premiums. We use the expense
ratio to evaluate the operating efficiency of our consolidated operations. Costs that cannot be readily identifiable as a direct cost of a product line remain in
Corporate and Other expenses.
Our expense ratio increased 135 basis points from 37.29% to 38.64% for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020.
General Corporate Expenses
General corporate expenses consist primarily of occupancy costs, such as rent and utilities. These costs are largely fixed and, therefore, do not vary
significantly with premium volume but do vary with the Company’s changes in properties held for investment. Our general corporate expenses increased
by $82,000, or 12.9%, in 2021 as compared to 2020.
Investment Income
Our investment portfolio consisted of 80.0% and 86.6% of readily marketable, investment-grade fixed-maturity securities as of December 31, 2021 and
2020, respectively. The remainder of the portfolio is comprised of rental real estate, perpetual preferred stock and common stock. Net investment income is
primarily comprised of interest earned and dividends paid on these securities and rental income on investment real estate, net of related investment
expenses, and excludes realized gains and losses.
Net investment income decreased by $84,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020. The slight decline in net investment income
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, was driven primarily by a reduction in equity security dividend income. Average invested assets for 2021
were $140,677,000 compared to $127,158,000 for 2020, an increase of $13,519,000, or 10.6%.
For additional information, see Item 1. Business — Investments above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased to $235,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 from $208,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, reflecting the cost
of the new $5.0 million FLHB loan agreement entered into in 2021.
Income Tax Expense
We reported income tax expense of $815,000 in 2021, as compared to $1,047,000 in 2020. Total income tax expense decreased in 2021 primarily due
to a favorable prior year tax true-up offset in part by an increase in taxes from 2021’s higher taxable earnings.
The Company has not established a valuation allowance against any of the net deferred tax assets.
~ 49 ~
Table of Contents
Financial Position
The following summarizes our financial position as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Unpaid Losses and Settlement Expense
Our reserves for unpaid loss and settlement expense are summarized below:
(In thousands)
Case reserves
IBNR reserves
Net unpaid losses and settlement expense
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and settlement expense
Reserves for unpaid loss and settlement expense
Actuarial Ranges
As of December 31,
2021
As of December 31,
2020
26,309 $
21,005
47,314
14,521
61,835 $
27,901
20,655
48,556
13,020
61,576
$
$
The selection of the ultimate loss is based on information unique to each line of business and accident year and the judgment and expertise of our
actuary and management.
The following table provides case and IBNR reserves for losses and settlement expenses as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
As of December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
Commercial liability
Property
Other
Total net reserves
Reinsurance recoverables
Gross reserves
As of December 31, 2020
(In thousands)
Commercial liability
Property
Other
Total net reserves
Reinsurance recoverables
Gross reserves
Case Reserves
$
IBNR Reserves
Total Reserves
Low
High
Actuarially Determined
Range of Estimates
18,540 $
(558)
3,023
21,005
10,519
31,524 $
37,763
2,460
7,091
47,314 $
14,521
61,835 $
IBNR Reserves
17,661 $
(39)
3,033
20,655
7,739
28,394 $
Total Reserves
36,680
4,036
7,840
48,556 $
13,020
61,576 $
41,980 $
12,932
54,912 $
49,737
17,112
66,849
Actuarially Determined
Range of Estimates
Low
High
42,860 $
10,962
53,822 $
50,780
14,742
65,522
19,223 $
3,018
4,068
26,309
4,002
30,311 $
19,019 $
4,075
4,807
27,901
5,281
33,182 $
$
$
Case Reserves
$
Our actuary determined a range of reasonable reserve estimates which reflect the uncertainty inherent in the loss reserve process. This range does not
represent the range of all possible outcomes. We believe that the actuarially-determined ranges represent reasonably likely changes in the loss and
settlement expense estimates, however, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. The range was determined by line of business and
accident year after a review of the output generated by the various actuarial methods utilized. The actuary reviewed the variance around the select loss
reserve estimates for each of the actuarial methods and selected reasonable low and high estimates based on his knowledge and judgment. In making these
judgments the actuary typically assumed, based on his experience, that the larger the reserve the less volatility and that property reserves would exhibit less
volatility than casualty reserves. In addition, when selecting these low and high estimates, the actuary considered:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
historical industry development experience in our business line;
historical company development experience;
the impact of court decisions on insurance coverage issues, which can impact the ultimate cost of settling claims;
changes in our internal claims processing policies and procedures; and
~ 50 ~
Table of Contents
(cid:0)
trends and risks in claim costs, such as risk that medical cost inflation could increase.
Our actuary is required to exercise a considerable degree of judgment in the evaluation of all of these and other factors in the analysis of our loss and
settlement expense reserves, and related range of anticipated losses. Because of the level of uncertainty impacting the estimation process, it is reasonably
possible that different actuaries would arrive at different conclusions. The method of determining the reserve range has not changed and the reserve range
generated by our actuary is consistent with the observed development of our loss reserves over the last few years.
The width of the range in reserves arises primarily because specific losses may not be known and reported for some period and the ultimate losses paid
and settlement expenses incurred with respect to known losses may be larger than currently estimated. The ultimate frequency or severity of these claims
can be very different than the assumptions we used in our estimation of ultimate reserves for these exposures.
Specifically, the following factors could impact the frequency and severity of claims, and therefore, the ultimate amount of loss and settlement expense
paid:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
the rate of increase in labor costs, medical costs, and material costs that underlie insured risks;
development of risk associated with our expanding producer relationships and our growth in new states or states where we currently have small
market share; and
impact of changes in laws or regulations.
The estimation process for determining the liability for unpaid loss and settlement expense inherently results in adjustments each year for claims
incurred (but not paid) in preceding years. Negative amounts reported for claims incurred related to prior years are a result of claims being settled for
amounts less than originally estimated (favorable development). Positive amounts reported for claims incurred related to prior years are a result of claims
being settled for amounts greater than originally estimated (unfavorable development). For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we experienced
adverse development of $732,000 and $1,206,000, respectively.
Potential for variability in our reserves is evidenced by this development. As further illustration of reserve variability, we initially estimated unpaid loss
and settlement expense net of reinsurance at the end of 2020 at $48,556,000. As of December 31, 2021, that amount was re-estimated at $49,288,000,
which is $732,000, or 1.5%, higher than the initial estimate.
As discussed earlier, the estimation of our reserves is based on several actuarial methods, each of which incorporates many quantitative assumptions.
The judgment of the actuary plays an important role in selecting among various loss development factors and selecting the appropriate method, or
combination of methods, to use for a given accident year. The ranges presented above represent the expected variability around the actuarially determined
central estimate. The total range around our actuarially determined estimate varies from (11.3)% to 5.1%. As shown in the table below, since 2016 the
variance in our originally estimated accident year loss reserves has ranged from (4.4)% deficient to 7.0% redundant as of December 31, 2021.
Recent Variabilities of Incurred Losses and Settlement Expense, Net of Reinsurance
(In thousands)
As originally estimated
As estimated at December 31, 2021
Net cumulative (deficiency) redundancy
% (deficiency) redundancy
2016
2017
Accident Year Data
2018
$
$
25,619 $
26,741
(1,121) $
(4.4)%
29,801 $
30,689
(888) $
(3.0)%
29,762 $
27,955
1,807 $
6.1%
2019
2020
33,564 $
34,551
(987) $
(2.9)%
31,356
29,162
2,194
7.0%
~ 51 ~
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes the impact on equity, net of tax, from changes in estimates of net unpaid loss and settlement expense:
(In thousands)
Reserve Range for Unpaid Losses and Settlement
Expense
Low End
Recorded
High End
2021
2020
December 31,
Aggregate Loss and
Settlement Reserve
Percentage Change in
Equity
Aggregate Loss and
Settlement Reserve
Percentage Change in
Equity
$
41,980
47,314
49,737
5.6% $
0.0%
(2.6)%
42,860
48,556
50,780
6.2%
0.0%
(2.4)%
If the net loss and settlement expense reserves were recorded at the high end of the actuarially-determined range as of December 31, 2021, the loss and
settlement expense reserves would increase by $2,423,000 before taxes. This increase in reserves would have the effect of decreasing net earnings and
equity as of December 31, 2021 by $1,914,000. If the loss and settlement expense reserves were recorded at the low end of the actuarially-determined range
as of December 31, 2021, the net loss and settlement expense reserves at December 31, 2021 would be reduced by $5,334,000 with corresponding increases
in net earnings and equity of $4,214,000.
Investments
Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale (AFS) and reported at fair value as determined by management based upon quoted market prices or a
recognized pricing service at the reporting date for those or similar investments. Changes in unrealized investment gains or losses on our AFS investments,
net of applicable income taxes, are reflected directly in equity as a component of comprehensive earnings (loss) and, accordingly, have no effect on net
earnings (loss). Equity securities are carried at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in net earnings. Investment income is recognized
when earned, and capital gains and losses are recognized when investments are sold, or other-than-temporarily impaired.
Corporate Bonds
The net unrealized gain in the Corporate bond portfolio decreased about $2.1 million from a gain of $4,394,000 at the end of 2020 to a gain of
$2,247,000 at the end of 2021. This sharp decrease in unrealized gains was driven by an increase in Treasury rates. In 2021, 5 year Treasury rates increased
90 bps and 10 year Treasury rates increased 60 bps. As a result of this rate move, Corporate bond prices dropped causing the unrealized gain position to
worsen.
Municipal Bonds
The net unrealized gain in the Municipal portfolio decreased from $1,300,000 at the end of 2020 to $1,127,000 at the end of 2021, a decrease of $0.17
million. This stability in the unrealized position was driven by two factors. Treasury rates rose during the year, which had a negative impact on Municipal
prices. However, this was mostly offset by spread tightening in the Municipal sector throughout the year. This spread tightening was driven by a number of
factors, most notably investor concerns about the potential for higher tax rates and an influx of cash into Municipal coffers from the fiscal stimulus
package.
The fair value and unrealized losses for our securities that were temporarily impaired are as follows:
(In thousands)
U.S. Treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Total temporarily impaired fixed maturity securities
Less than 12 Months
December 31, 2021
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
$
391 $
20,404
6,428
2,676
29,899 $
(9) $
(244)
(162)
(19)
(434) $
292 $
1,124
995
269
2,680 $
(8) $
(52)
(26)
(4)
(90) $
683 $
21,528
7,423
2,945
32,579 $
(17)
(296)
(188)
(23)
(524)
~ 52 ~
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
U.S. Treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Total temporarily impaired fixed maturity securities
Less than 12 Months
December 31, 2020
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
$
299 $
7,120
1,740
757
9,916 $
(1) $
(116)
(35)
(16)
(168) $
— $
2,010
—
—
2,010 $
— $
(17)
—
—
(17) $
299 $
9,130
1,740
757
11,926 $
(1)
(133)
(35)
(16)
(185)
The unrealized losses as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were primarily related to changes in the interest rate environment. Fair values of interest rate
sensitive instruments may be affected by increases and decreases in prevailing interest rates which generally translate, respectively, into decreases and
increases in fair values of fixed maturity investments. The fair values of interest rate sensitive instruments also may be affected by the credit worthiness of
the issuer, prepayment options, relative values of other investments, the liquidity of the instrument, and other general market conditions.
We monitor our investment portfolio and review securities that have experienced a decline in fair value below cost to evaluate whether the decline is
other than temporary. When assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered, we compare the present value of the cash flows
likely to be collected, based on an evaluation of all available information relevant to the collectability of the security, to the amortized cost basis of the
security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation to the amortized cost basis is referred to as the “credit loss.”
If there is a credit loss, the impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary. If we identify that an other-than-temporary impairment loss has occurred,
we then determine whether we intend to sell the security, or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security prior to recovering the
amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. If we determine that we do not intend to sell, and it is not more likely than not that we will be
required to sell the security, the amount of the impairment loss related to the credit loss will be recorded in earnings, and the remaining portion of the other-
than-temporary impairment loss will be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. If we determine that we intend to sell the security, or
that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security prior to recovering its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses,
the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) will be recognized in earnings.
There were no other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in net earnings during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Adverse
investment market conditions, or poor operating results of underlying investments, could result in impairment charges in the future.
We use quoted values and other data provided by independent pricing services in our process for determining fair values of our investments. The
evaluations of such pricing services represent an exit price and a good faith opinion as to what a buyer in the marketplace would pay for a security in a
current sale. This pricing service provides us with one quote per instrument. For fixed maturity securities that have quoted prices in active markets, market
quotations are provided. For fixed maturity securities that do not trade on a daily basis, the independent pricing service prepares estimates of fair value
using a wide array of observable inputs including relevant market information, benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and
matrix pricing. The observable market inputs that our independent pricing service utilizes may include (listed in order of priority for use) benchmark yields,
reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, market bids/offers, and other reference data on markets,
industry, and the economy. Additionally, the independent pricing service uses an option adjusted spread model to develop prepayment and interest rate
scenarios. The pricing service did not use broker quotes in determining fair values of our investments.
Should the independent pricing service be unable to provide a fair value estimate, we would attempt to obtain a non-binding fair value estimate from a
number of broker-dealers and review this estimate in conjunction with a fair value estimate reported by an independent business news service or other
sources. In instances where only one broker-dealer provides a fair value for a fixed maturity security, we use that estimate. In instances where we are able
to obtain fair value estimates from more than one broker-dealer, we would review the range of estimates and would select the most appropriate value based
on the facts and circumstances. Should neither the independent pricing service nor a broker-dealer provide a fair value estimate, we would develop a fair
value estimate based on cash flow analyses and other valuation techniques that utilize certain unobservable inputs. Accordingly, we would classify such a
security as a Level 3 investment.
The fair value estimates of our investments provided by the independent pricing service at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively,
were utilized, among other resources, in reaching a conclusion as to the fair value of our investments.
~ 53 ~
Table of Contents
Management reviews the reasonableness of the pricing provided by the independent pricing service by employing various analytical procedures. We
review all securities to identify recent downgrades, significant changes in pricing, and pricing anomalies on individual securities relative to other similar
securities. This will include looking for relative consistency across securities in common sectors, durations, and credit ratings. This review will also include
all fixed maturity securities rated lower than “A” by Moody’s or S&P. If, after this review, management does not believe the pricing for any security is a
reasonable estimate of fair value, then it will seek to resolve the discrepancy through discussions with the pricing service. In our review we did not identify
any such discrepancies for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, and no adjustments were made to the estimates provided by the pricing service.
The classification within the fair value hierarchy of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, is then confirmed based
on the final conclusions from the pricing review.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Certain acquisition costs consisting of direct and ceded commissions, premium taxes and certain other direct underwriting expenses that vary with and
are primarily related to the production of business are deferred and amortized over the effective period of the related insurance policies as the underlying
policy premiums are earned. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, deferred acquisition costs and the related unearned premium reserves were as
follows:
(In thousands)
Deferred acquisition costs
Unearned premium reserves
$
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
6,539
36,212
$
5,430
29,789
The method followed in computing deferred acquisition costs limits the amount of deferred costs to their estimated realizable value, which gives effect
to the premium to be earned, related investment income, loss and settlement expenses, and certain other costs expected to be incurred as the premium is
earned. Future changes in estimates, the most significant of which is expected loss and settlement expenses, may require adjustments to deferred policy
acquisition costs. If the estimation of net realizable value indicates that the deferred acquisition costs are not recoverable, they would be written off.
Income Taxes
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes arise from the recognition of temporary differences
between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than
not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period of the enactment date.
We had a net deferred tax liability of $955,000 and $1,231,000 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. A valuation allowance is required to be
established for any portion of a deferred tax asset for which we believe it is more likely than not that it will not be realized. At December 31, 2021 and
2020, we had no valuation allowance with respect to a deferred tax asset.
We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require
us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently
subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to
record an additional valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties. Periods still subject to Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) audit include 2018 through the current year. There are currently no open tax exams. The tax return related to the year ended
December 31, 2021 has not yet been filed.
Other Assets
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, other assets totaled $1,344,000 and $1,308,000, respectively. These balances include Corporate Owned Life
Insurance policies on Arron K. Sutherland, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Norman D. Schmeichel, Vice President – Chief Information Officer.
Outstanding Debt
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, outstanding debt balances totaled $18,455,000 and $13,466,000, respectively. The average rate on remaining debt
was 1.3% and 1.6% as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
~ 54 ~
Table of Contents
Debt Obligation
ICC Holdings, Inc. secured a loan with a commercial bank in March 2017 in the amount of $3,500,000 and used the proceeds to repay ICC for the
money borrowed by the ESOP. The term of the loan is five years bearing interest at 3.65%. The Company pledged stock and $1.0 million of marketable
assets as collateral for the loan.
In response to COVID-19, the Company obtained in March 2020 and May 2020 a $6.0 million and $4.0 million loan, respectively, from the FHLBC as
a precautionary measure to increase its cash position, to provide increased liquidity, and to compensate for potential reductions in premium receivable
collections. The Company’s $4.0 million loan matured on May 3, 2021 and, on this date, a new $4.0 million FHLBC loan became effective. In addition, the
Company entered into a one year, $5.0 million FHLBC loan on May 28, 2021. See Note 5 – Debt of this Form 10-K for more information.
Revolving Line of Credit
We maintained a revolving line of credit with a commercial bank, which permitted borrowing up to an aggregate principal amount of $1.75 million.
This facility was entered into during 2013 and expired August 2020. The line of credit was priced at 30-day LIBOR plus 2% with a floor of 3.5%. In order
to secure the lowest rate possible, the Company pledged marketable securities not to exceed $5.0 million in the event the Company would draw down on
the line of credit. There were no financial covenants governing this agreement.
Effective August 3, 2020, the Company replaced its expired line of credit with a $2.0 million revolving line of credit with another commercial bank,
which renews annually and has a current expiration date of July 2022. This new line of credit is priced at Prime plus 0.5%. The Company pledged $2.0
million of business assets in the event the Company draws down on the line of credit. There are no financial covenants governing this agreement.
There was no interest paid on these lines of credit during the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Other Liabilities
As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, other liabilities totaled $1,031,000 and $1,291,000, respectively. The decrease in other liabilities
relates primarily to $210,000 of investment purchases that were pending settlement as of year-end December 31, 2020.
For information regarding our reinsurance program, investment portfolio, unpaid losses and settlement information, see Item 1. Business.
ESOP
In connection with our conversion and public offering, we established an ESOP. The ESOP borrowed from the Company to purchase 350,000 shares
in the offering. The issuance of the shares to the ESOP resulted in a contra account established in the shareholder’s equity section of the balance sheet for
the unallocated shares at an amount equal to their $10.00 per share purchase price.
The Company may make discretionary contributions to the ESOP and pay dividends on unallocated shares to the ESOP. The ESOP uses funds it
receives to repay the loan. When loan payments are made, ESOP shares are allocated to participants based on relative compensation and expense is
recorded. The Company contributed $294,000 and $295,000 to the ESOP during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
A compensation expense charge is booked monthly during each year for the shares committed to be allocated to participants that year, determined with
reference to the fair market value of our stock at the time the commitment to allocate the shares is accrued and recognized. For the year ended December
31, 2021, we recognized compensation expense of $270,000 related to 23,437 shares of our common stock that were committed to be released to
participants’ accounts for the year ended December 31, 2021. Of the 23,437 shares committed to be released, 1,926 shares were committed on December
31, 2021 and had no impact on the weighted average common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2021. For the year ended December 31,
2020, we recognized compensation expense of $283,000 related to 23,437 shares of our common stock that were committed to be released to participants’
accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020. Of the 23,437 shares committed to be released, 1,985 shares were committed on December 31, 2020 and
had no impact on the weighted average common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2020. The fair value of the unearned ESOP shares as
of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $3,926,000 and $3,687,000, respectively.
~ 55 ~
Table of Contents
Restricted Stock Units
RSUs were granted for the first time in February 2018 with additional RSUs granted in March 2019, April 2020 and April 2021. RSUs have a grant
date value equal to the closing price of the Company’s stock on the dates the shares are granted. The RSUs vest 1/3 over three years from the date of grant.
As of December 31, 2021, 11,700, 13,071, 18,040 and 15,000 RSUs have been granted at a fair market value of $15.10, $13.70, $11.03 and $14.78,
respectively. As of December 31, 2020, 11,700, 13,071 and 18,040 RSUs have been granted at a fair market value of $15.10, $13.70 and $11.03 per share,
respectively. We recognized $187,000 and $172,000 of expense on these units in the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Total
unrecognized compensation expense relating to outstanding and unvested RSUs was $255,000 and $224,000 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively, which is recognized over the remainder of the three year vesting periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We generate sufficient funds from our operations and maintain a high degree of liquidity in our investment portfolio to meet the demands of claim
settlements and operating expenses. The primary sources of funds are premium collections, investment earnings and maturing investments.
We maintain investment and reinsurance programs that are intended to provide sufficient funds to meet our obligations without forced sales of
investments. We maintain a portion of our investment portfolio in relatively short-term and highly liquid assets to ensure the availability of funds.
Cash flows from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
5,312
(12,155)
4,851
(1,992)
$
$
1,613
(13,111)
11,470
(28)
$
$
The Parent Company’s principal source of liquidity is dividend payments and other fees received from ICC, Beverage Insurance Agency Inc., Katkin
and ICC Realty, LLC. ICC is restricted by the insurance laws of Illinois as to the amount of dividends or other distributions it may pay to us. Under Illinois
law, there is a maximum amount that may be paid by ICC during any twelve-month period. ICC may pay dividends to us after notice to, but without prior
approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance in an amount “not to exceed” the greater of (i) 10% of the surplus as regards policyholders of ICC as
reported on its most recent annual statement filed with the Illinois Department of Insurance, or (ii) the statutory net income of ICC for the period covered
by such annual statement. Dividends in excess of this amount are considered “extraordinary” and are subject to the approval of the Illinois Department of
Insurance.
The amount available for payment of dividends from ICC in 2022 without the prior approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance is approximately
$6.3 million based upon the insurance company’s 2021 annual statement. Prior to its payment of any dividend, ICC is required to provide notice of the
dividend to the Illinois Department of Insurance. This notice must be provided to the Illinois Department of Insurance 30 days prior to the payment of an
extraordinary dividend and 10 days prior to the payment of an ordinary dividend. The Illinois Department of Insurance has the power to limit or prohibit
dividend payments if ICC is in violation of any law or regulation. These restrictions or any subsequently imposed restrictions may affect our future
liquidity. ICC paid dividends of $800,000 and $500,000 to ICC Holdings, Inc. in April 2021 and March 2020, respectively.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company has received 1,296 claims for business interruption related to COVID-19. This count has not changed since
the period ended March 31, 2021. Based on policy language, the Company does not anticipate that coverage will be triggered for these property claims
requiring loss payment.
The actual timing of gross loss and loss adjustment expense payments is unknown and therefore timing estimates are based on historical experience
and the expectations of future payment patterns.
~ 56 ~
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital reserves.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting us, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated
financial statements.
~ 57 ~
Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Information about Market Risk
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that we will incur losses due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. We have exposure to three principal
types of market risk through our investment activities: interest rate risk, credit risk and equity risk. Our primary market risk exposure is to changes in
interest rates. We have not entered, and do not plan to enter, into any derivative financial instruments for hedging interest rate risk, trading or speculative
purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in interest rates. Our exposure to interest rate changes primarily
results from our significant holdings of fixed rate investments. Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the fair value of these securities.
The average maturity of the debt securities in our investment portfolio at December 31, 2021, was 9.39 years. Our debt securities investments include
U.S. government bonds, securities issued by government agencies, obligations of state and local governments and governmental authorities, and corporate
bonds, most of which are exposed to changes in prevailing interest rates and which may experience moderate fluctuations in fair value resulting from
changes in interest rates. We carry these investments as available for sale. This allows us to manage our exposure to risks associated with interest rate
fluctuations through active review of our investment portfolio by our management and board of directors and consultation with our third party investment
managers.
Fluctuations in near-term interest rates could have an impact on our results of operations and cash flows. Certain securities may have call features. In a
declining interest rate environment these securities may be called by their issuer and replaced with securities bearing lower interest rates. If we are required
to sell these securities in a rising interest rate environment we may recognize losses.
As a general matter, we attempt to match the durations of our assets with the durations of our liabilities. Our investment objectives include maintaining
adequate liquidity to meet our operational needs, optimizing our after-tax investment income, and our after-tax total return, all of which are subject to our
tolerance for risk.
The table below shows the interest rate sensitivity of our fixed maturity investments measured in terms of fair value (which is equal to the carrying
value for all of our investment securities that are subject to interest rate changes):
Hypothetical Change in Interest Rates (In thousands)
200 basis point increase
100 basis point increase
No change
100 basis point decrease1
200 basis point decrease1
1Assumes U.S. rates are floored at 0%
Credit Risk
December 31, 2021
Estimated Change in Fair Value
(10,404)
$
(5,377)
$
—
4,392
7,218
Fair Value
95,438
100,465
105,842
110,234
113,060
Credit risk is the potential economic loss principally arising from adverse changes in the financial condition of a specific debt issuer. We address this
risk by investing primarily in fixed maturity securities that are rated investment grade and at least 70% of our investment securities must be rated at least
“A” by Moody’s or an equivalent rating quality. We also independently, and through our independent third party investment managers, monitor the
financial condition of all of the issuers of fixed maturity securities in the portfolio. To limit our exposure to risk, we employ diversification rules that limit
the credit exposure to any single issuer or asset class.
Equity Risk
Equity price risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in equity prices.
~ 58 ~
Table of Contents
Impact of Inflation
Inflation increases our customers’ needs for property and casualty insurance coverage due to the increase in the value of the property covered and any
potential liability exposure. Inflation also increases claims incurred by property and casualty insurers as property repairs, replacements and medical
expenses increase. These cost increases reduce profit margins to the extent that rate increases are not implemented on an adequate and timely basis. We
establish property and casualty insurance premium levels before the amounts of loss and loss expenses, or the extent to which inflation may impact these
expenses, are known. Therefore, we attempt to anticipate the potential impact of inflation when establishing rates. The Company has positively adjusted its
rates over the last two years in an effort to offset the potentially negative impact of rising inflation.
~ 59 ~
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Johnson Lambert LLP, Park Ridge, IL, PCAOB ID 262)
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets (As of December 31, 2021 and 2020)
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings (Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedules to Consolidated Financial Statements
~ 60 ~
61
62
63
64
65
66
93
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee, Board of Directors, and Shareholders
ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related
notes and financial statement schedules listed in Item 15 of the Company’s Form 10-K (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and
2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the entity’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or
fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
We have served as ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ auditor since 2019.
Park Ridge, IL
March 30, 2022
~ 61 ~
Table of Contents
ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Assets
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities (amortized cost of $102,145,223 at 12/31/2021 and $98,753,027 at
12/31/2020)
Common stocks at fair value
Preferred stocks at fair value
Other invested assets
Property held for investment, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $464,713 at
12/31/2021 and $465,364 at 12/31/2020
Cash and cash equivalents
$
Total investments and cash
Accrued investment income
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable, net of allowances for uncollectible amounts of
$100,000 at 12/31/2021 and $150,000 at 12/31/2020
Ceded unearned premiums
Reinsurance balances recoverable on unpaid losses and settlement expenses, net of allowances
for uncollectible amounts of $0 at 12/31/2021 and 12/31/2020
Income taxes - current
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net
Property and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $6,243,055 at 12/31/2021
and $6,079,728 at 12/31/2020
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Unpaid losses and settlement expenses
Unearned premiums
Reinsurance balances payable
Corporate debt
Accrued expenses
Income taxes - deferred
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity:
Common stock1
Treasury stock, at cost2
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of tax
Retained earnings
Less: Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares at cost3
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
$
$
$
As of
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
105,841,543 $
23,608,197
2,780,450
3,086,568
5,509,114
4,606,378
145,432,250
659,413
27,199,804
967,022
14,521,219
195,694
6,538,844
3,144,218
1,343,504
200,001,968 $
61,834,809 $
36,212,266
1,368,294
18,455,342
5,441,611
954,862
1,030,870
125,298,054
35,000
(3,155,399)
32,965,136
2,920,027
44,282,895
(2,343,745)
74,703,914
200,001,968 $
105,740,566
14,724,814
1,683,892
1,772,867
5,399,826
6,598,842
135,920,807
660,793
23,506,171
860,905
13,019,865
372,986
5,429,620
2,860,331
1,307,794
183,939,272
61,575,666
29,788,834
371,195
13,465,574
3,472,511
1,231,271
1,290,532
111,195,583
35,000
(3,153,838)
32,780,436
5,520,091
40,140,115
(2,578,115)
72,743,689
183,939,272
1 Par value $0.01; authorized: 2021 – 10,000,000 shares and 2020 – 10,000,000 shares; issued: 2021 – 3,500,000 and 2020 – 3,500,000 shares; outstanding: 2021 –
3,291,852 and 2020 –3,291,125 shares.
2 2021 – 208,875 shares and 2020 – 203,811 shares
3 2021 –234,374 shares and 2020 –257,811 shares
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
~ 62 ~
Table of Contents
ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings
Net premiums earned
Net investment income
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Net unrealized gains on equity securities
Gain on extinguishment of debt
Other income (loss)
Consolidated revenues
Losses and settlement expenses
Policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses
Interest expense on debt
General corporate expenses
Total expenses
Earnings before income taxes
Income tax expense:
Current
Deferred
Total income tax expense
Net earnings
Earnings per share:
Basic:
Basic net earnings per share
Diluted:
Diluted net earnings per share
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
Net earnings
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax
Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities:
For the Twelve-Months Ended
December 31,
2021
53,893,020 $
3,414,408
982,547
2,801,991
—
348,709
61,440,675
34,699,543
20,824,900
235,001
723,350
56,482,794
4,957,881
400,355
414,747
815,102
4,142,779 $
2020
49,689,202
3,497,702
(245,323)
2,167,417
1,641,299
(231,024)
56,519,273
32,561,988
18,529,446
207,719
641,763
51,940,916
4,578,357
537,078
509,915
1,046,993
3,531,364
1.36 $
1.35 $
1.17
1.16
$
$
$
$
3,047,433
3,065,025
3,027,903
3,041,898
$
4,142,779 $
3,531,364
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period, net of income tax (benefit) expense of
$(641,107) in 2021 and $802,634 in 2020
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of income tax expense of $50,050
in 2021 and $120,492 in 2020
Total other comprehensive (loss) earnings
$
Comprehensive earnings
$
(2,411,782) $
3,019,434
(188,282)
(2,600,064)
1,542,715 $
(453,279)
2,566,155
6,097,519
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
~ 63 ~
Table of Contents
ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2020
Purchase of treasury stock
Net earnings
Other comprehensive earnings, net
of tax
Restricted stock unit expense
ESOP compensation expense
Common
stock
Treasury stock
Unearned ESOP
Additional paid-in
capital
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
earnings (loss)
Total equity
$
35,000 $
—
—
(3,146,576) $
(150,642)
—
(2,812,485) $
—
—
32,703,209 $
—
—
36,608,750 $
—
3,531,365
2,953,936 $
—
—
66,341,834
(150,642)
3,531,365
—
—
—
—
—
—
143,380
2
—
—
234,370
28,375
48,852
—
—
—
2,566,155
2,566,155
—
—
171,755
283,222
Balance, January 1, 2021
Purchase of treasury stock
Net earnings
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
$
35,000 $
—
—
—
(3,153,838) $
(139,160)
—
—
(2,578,115) $
—
—
—
32,780,436 $
—
—
—
40,140,115 $
—
4,142,780
—
5,520,091 $
—
—
(2,600,064)
72,743,689
(139,160)
4,142,780
(2,600,064)
Restricted stock unit expense
ESOP compensation expense
—
—
137,600
1
—
—
234,370
49,297
135,403
—
—
—
—
186,897
369,773
Balance, December 31, 2021
$
35,000 $
(3,155,399) $
(2,343,745) $
32,965,136 $
44,282,895 $
2,920,027 $
74,703,914
1Amount represents restricted stock units that have fully vested in the period.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
~ 64 ~
Table of Contents
ICC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Twelve-Month Periods Ended December 31,
2020
2021
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities
$
4,142,779 $
Net realized investment (gains) losses
Net unrealized gains on equity securities
Depreciation
Deferred income tax
Amortization of bond premium and discount
Stock-based compensation expense
Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness
Change in:
Accrued investment income
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
Ceded unearned premiums
Reinsurance balances payable
Reinsurance balances recoverable
Deferred policy acquisition costs
Unpaid losses and settlement expenses
Unearned premiums
Accrued expenses
Current federal income tax
Other
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of:
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale
Common stocks
Preferred stocks
Other invested assets
Property held for investment
Property and equipment
Proceeds from sales, maturities and calls of:
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale
Common stocks
Preferred stocks
Other invested assets
Property held for investment
Property and equipment
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from loans
Repayments of borrowed funds
Purchase of treasury stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental information:
Federal income tax paid
Interest paid
Non-cash transaction: Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
$
$
$
$
~ 65 ~
(982,547)
(2,801,991)
708,378
414,747
281,679
556,670
—
1,380
(3,693,633)
(106,117)
997,099
(1,501,354)
(1,109,224)
259,143
6,423,432
1,969,100
177,292
(424,907)
5,311,926
(21,860,180)
(8,399,079)
(1,464,198)
(1,599,999)
(1,725,358)
(992,314)
18,590,418
3,023,990
340,523
315,077
1,470,833
145,287
(12,154,999)
9,000,000
(4,010,231)
(139,160)
4,850,609
(1,992,464)
6,598,842
4,606,378 $
145,000 $
230,700 $
— $
3,531,364
245,323
(2,167,417)
684,744
509,915
292,502
454,977
(1,641,299)
(14,289)
(1,137,645)
(38,087)
(3,803)
(1,983,695)
(160,364)
4,737,359
(603,983)
(744,477)
(180,427)
(167,351)
1,613,347
(27,284,955)
(4,300,890)
(1,768,862)
(995,567)
(1,276,802)
(385,966)
17,174,787
5,224,984
297,609
100,000
86,145
18,783
(13,110,734)
11,629,800
(9,514)
(150,642)
11,469,644
(27,743)
6,626,585
6,598,842
718,000
200,500
1,641,299
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
ICC Holdings, Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporation that was organized in 2016. As used in these financial statements, references to the “Company,”
“we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the consolidated group. In March 2017, the Company’s stock began trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the ticker
symbol “ICCH”. On a stand-alone basis ICC Holdings, Inc. is referred to as the “Parent Company.” The consolidated group consists of the holding
company, ICC Holdings, Inc.; ICC Realty, LLC, a real estate services and holding company; Beverage Insurance Agency, Inc., a non-insurance subsidiary;
Estrella Innovative Solutions, Inc., an outsourcing company; Southern Hospitality Education, LLC, dba Katkin, a full-service food safety and education
company; and Illinois Casualty Company (ICC), an operating insurance company. ICC is an Illinois domiciled company.
We are a specialty insurance carrier primarily underwriting commercial multi-peril, liquor liability, workers’ compensation, and umbrella liability
coverages for the food and beverage industry through our subsidiary insurance company, ICC. ICC writes business in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin and markets through independent agents. Approximately 24.0% and
25.0% of the premium was written in Illinois for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The Company operates as a
single segment.
B. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which
differ in some respects from those followed in reports to insurance regulatory authorities. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet, revenues and expenses for the periods then ended, and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known which could impact the amounts
reported and disclosed herein. The most significant of these amounts is the liability for unpaid losses and settlement expenses. Other estimates include
investment valuation and other-than-temporary impairments (OTTIs), reinsurance recoverables and the collectability of reinsurance balances, recoverability
of deferred tax assets, and deferred policy acquisition costs. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment.
Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic
environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and
circumstances dictate. Although recorded estimates are supported by actuarial computations and other supportive data, the estimates are ultimately based
on expectations of future events. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial
statements in future periods.
C. INVESTMENTS
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale (AFS) and reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are excluded from
net earnings but are recorded as a separate component of comprehensive earnings and shareholders’ equity, net of deferred income taxes.
EQUITY SECURITIES
Equity securities include common stock, mutual funds, and non-redeemable preferred stock. Equity securities are carried at fair value with subsequent
changes in fair value recorded in net earnings.
~ 66 ~
Table of Contents
OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENT
Under current accounting standards, an OTTI write-down of fixed maturity securities, where fair value is below amortized cost, is triggered by
circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security, (2) it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a
security in a loss position or if it is more likely than not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in
earnings equal to the difference between the security’s amortized cost and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more
likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss,
which is recognized in earnings, and the amount related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Impairment losses result in a
reduction of the underlying investment’s cost basis.
The Company regularly evaluates its fixed maturity securities using both quantitative and qualitative criteria to determine impairment losses for other-
than-temporary declines in the fair value of the investments. The following are the key factors for determining if a security is other-than-temporarily
impaired:
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
(cid:0)
The extent to which the fair value is less than cost,
The assessment of significant adverse changes to the cash flows on a fixed maturity investment,
The occurrence of a discrete credit event resulting in the issuer defaulting on a material obligation, the issuer seeking protection from creditors
under the bankruptcy laws, the issuer proposing a voluntary reorganization under which creditors are asked to exchange their claims for cash or
securities having a fair value substantially lower than par value,
The probability that the Company will recover the entire amortized cost basis of the fixed income securities prior to maturity, or
The ability and intent to hold fixed maturity securities until maturity.
Quantitative and qualitative criteria are considered to varying degrees depending on the sector the analysis is being performed. The sectors are as
follows:
Corporates
The Company performs a qualitative evaluation of holdings that fall below the price threshold. The analysis begins with an opinion of industry and
competitive position. This includes an assessment of factors that enable the profit structure of the business (e.g., reserve profile for exploration and
production companies), competitive advantage (e.g., distribution system), management strategy, and an analysis of trends in return on invested capital.
Analysts may also review other factors to determine whether an impairment exists including liquidity, asset value cash flow generation, and industry
multiples.
Municipals
The Company analyzes the screened impairment candidates on a quantitative and qualitative basis. This includes an assessment of the factors that may
be contributing to the unrealized loss and whether the recovery value is greater or less than current market value.
Structured Securities
The “stated assumptions” analytic approach relies on actual 6-month average collateral performance measures (voluntary prepayment rate, gross
default rate, and loss severity) sourced through third party data providers or remittance reports. The analysis applies the stated assumptions throughout the
remaining term of the transaction using forecasted cashflows, which are then applied through the transaction structure (reflecting the priority of payments
and performance triggers) to determine whether there is a loss to the security (“Loss to Tranche”). For securities or sectors for which no actual loss or
minimal loss has been observed (certain Prime Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) and Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS),
for example), sector-based assumptions are applied, or an alternative quantitative or qualitative analysis is performed.
INVESTMENT INCOME
Interest on fixed maturities and short-term investments is credited to earnings on an accrual basis. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted
over the lives of the related fixed maturities. Dividends on equity securities are credited to earnings on the ex-dividend date. Realized gains and losses on
disposition of investments are based on specific identification of the investments sold on the settlement date, which does not differ significantly from trade
date accounting.
~ 67 ~
Table of Contents
D. OTHER INVESTED ASSETS
Other invested assets include privately held investments and promissory notes. Privately held investments are carried at cost and given that there is no
readily available market for these to trade in, management believes cost accurately reflects fair value. The promissory notes are carried at cost which
management believes reflects fair value.
E. PROPERTY HELD FOR INVESTMENT
Property held for investment purposes is initially recorded at the purchase price, which is generally fair value, and is subsequently reported at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Buildings are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the building, which we estimate to be 39 years.
Income from property held for investment is reported as net investment income.
F. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash consists of uninvested balances in bank accounts. Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of 90 days or less, primarily
AAA-rated prime and government money market funds. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company has not
experienced losses on these instruments. We maintain cash balances primarily at one bank, which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(“FDIC”) up to $250,000. During the normal course of business, balances are maintained above the FDIC insurance limit.
G. REINSURANCE
Ceded unearned premiums and reinsurance balances recoverable on paid and unpaid losses and settlement expenses are reported separately as assets
instead of being netted with the related liabilities, since reinsurance does not relieve us of our legal liability to our policyholders.
Quarterly, the Company monitors the financial condition of its reinsurers. The Company’s monitoring efforts include, but are not limited to, the review
of annual summarized reinsurer financial data and analysis of the credit risk associated with reinsurance balances recoverable by monitoring the A.M. Best
and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) ratings. In addition, the Company subjects its reinsurance recoverables to detailed recoverable tests, including an analysis
based on average default by A.M. Best rating. Based upon the review and testing, the Company’s policy is to charge to earnings, in the form of an
allowance, an estimate of unrecoverable amounts from reinsurers. This allowance is reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that the amount makes a
reasonable provision for reinsurance balances that the Company may be unable to recover.
H. POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
The Company defers commissions, premium taxes, and certain other costs that are incrementally or directly related to the successful acquisition of new
or renewal insurance contracts. Acquisition-related costs may be deemed ineligible for deferral when they are based on contingent or performance criteria
beyond the basic acquisition of the insurance contract or when efforts to obtain or renew the insurance contract are unsuccessful. All eligible costs are
capitalized and charged to expense in proportion to premium revenue recognized. The method followed in computing deferred policy acquisition costs
limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value. This deferral methodology applies to both gross and ceded premiums and
acquisition costs.
~ 68 ~
Table of Contents
I. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are presented at cost, less accumulated depreciation, and are depreciated using accelerated methods for financial statement
purposes for a period based on their economic life. Computer equipment is depreciated over 3 years and equipment over a range of 5 to 7 years. Buildings
are depreciated over 39 years and related improvements over 15 years. Annually, the Company reviews the major asset classes held for impairment. For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized no impairments. Property and equipment are summarized as follows:
Automobiles
Furniture and fixtures
Computer equipment and software
Home office
Total cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net property and equipment
J. UNPAID LOSSES AND SETTLEMENT EXPENSES
As of
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
507,889 $
512,268
4,350,118
4,016,998
9,387,273
(6,243,055)
3,144,218 $
530,722
491,766
3,971,272
3,946,299
8,940,059
(6,079,728)
2,860,331
$
$
The liability for unpaid losses and settlement expenses represents estimates of both reported and unreported claims and related expenses. The estimates
are based on various actuarial reserving methodologies and other assumptions related to the ultimate cost to settle such claims. The reserving
methodologies used are Loss Development for paid and incurred loss and settlement expense, Expected Loss Ratio for ultimate loss and settlement
expense, Bornhuetter-Ferguson (B-F) for paid and incurred loss, and A&OE (also known as the “Wendy Johnson Method”) for unpaid adjusting and other
expense. The assumptions used are subject to occasional changes due to evolving economic, social, and political conditions. There were no changes to the
core methodologies used as of December 31, 2021.
All estimates are periodically reviewed and, as experience develops and new information becomes known, the reserves are adjusted as necessary. Such
adjustments are reflected in the results of operations in the period in which they are determined. Due to the inherent uncertainty in estimating reserves for
losses and settlement expenses, there can be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed recorded amounts. If actual liabilities do exceed
recorded amounts, there will be an adverse effect. Based on the current assumptions used in estimating reserves, we believe that our overall reserve levels
at December 31, 2021, make a reasonable provision to meet our future obligations. See Note 7 – Unpaid Losses and Settlement Expenses for further
discussion.
K. PREMIUMS
Premiums are recognized ratably over the term of the contracts, net of ceded reinsurance. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums
written relative to the unexpired terms of coverage. Unearned premiums are calculated on a daily pro rata basis. A premium deficiency reserve should be
recognized if the sum of expected claim costs and claim adjustment expenses, expected dividends to policyholders, unamortized acquisition costs, and
maintenance costs exceeds related unearned premiums. The Company utilizes anticipated investment income as a factor in its premium deficiency
calculation. The Company concluded that no premium deficiency adjustments were necessary in either of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
L. GENERAL CORPORATE EXPENSES
General corporate expenses consist primarily of real estate and occupancy costs, such as utilities and maintenance. These costs do not vary
significantly with premium volume but rather with square footage of real estate owned.
~ 69 ~
Table of Contents
M. INCOME TAXES
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Federal income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method under which
deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years
to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, operating losses and tax credit carry
forwards. The effect on deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets
are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not all or some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company considers uncertainties in income taxes and recognizes those in its consolidated financial statements as required. As it relates to
uncertainties in income taxes, unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalty accruals, are not considered material to the consolidated financial
statements. Also, no tax uncertainties are expected to result in significant increases or decreases to unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12-month
period. Penalties and interest related to income tax uncertainties, should they occur, would be included in income tax expense in the period in which they
are incurred.
ICC is subject to minimal state income tax liabilities. On a state basis, since the majority of income is from insurance operations, the Company pays
premium taxes in lieu of state income tax. Premium taxes are a component of policy acquisition costs and calculated as a percentage of gross premiums
written.
N. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
The Company recognizes employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) compensation expense ratably during each year for the shares committed to be
allocated to participants that year. This expense is determined by the fair market value of our stock at the time the commitment to allocate the shares is
accrued and recognized. For purposes of balance sheet disclosures of shares outstanding, the Company includes only the number of ESOP shares that have
been committed to be released for the period. For purposes of calculating earnings per share, the Company includes the weighted average ESOP shares
committed to be released for the period. The ESOP covers all employees who have worked a minimum of 1,000 hours in the plan year.
O. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) are calculated by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. The denominator for basic and diluted EPS includes ESOP shares committed to be released. Dilutive
earnings per share includes the effect of all potentially dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock units (RSUs), outstanding during the period.
P. COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
Comprehensive earnings include net earnings plus unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities, net of tax. In reporting the components of
comprehensive earnings on a net basis in the consolidated statement of earnings, the Company used a 21% tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2021,
and 2020. Other comprehensive earnings, as shown in the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings, is net of tax (benefit) expense
of $(691,157) and $682,142 for 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive earnings for unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale fixed maturity
securities:
Beginning balance
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings before reclassification
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) earnings
Ending balance
~ 70 ~
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
5,520,091 $
(2,411,782)
(188,282)
(2,600,064)
2,920,027 $
2,953,936
3,019,434
(453,279)
2,566,155
5,520,091
Table of Contents
The following table provides the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the periods presented:
Amounts Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Earnings Component
Unrealized (gains) on AFS investments:
Total reclassification adjustment, net of tax
Q. ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Twelve-Month Periods Ended
December 31,
2021
2020
Affected Line Item in the Statement
where Net Earnings is Presented
$
$
(238,332) $
50,050
(188,282) $
(573,771) Net realized investment (gains)
120,492 Income tax expense
(453,279)
Fair Value Measurement – Disclosure Requirements (ASU 2018-13) – The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements for fair
value measurements by removing, modifying or adding certain disclosures. We adopted this update on January 1, 2020.
Income Taxes – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU 2019-12) – The amendments in this update simplify the accounting for income
taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the tax accounting guidance related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for
calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities related to foreign investment ownership changes. It also
simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a
step-up in the tax basis of goodwill and allocating consolidated income taxes to separate financial statements of entities not subject to income tax. We
adopted this update January 1, 2021 with minimal impact to our consolidated financial statements.
R.PROSPECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The dates presented below represent the implementation dates for the Company. The Company’s status as an Emerging Growth Company could delay
the required adoption of each of these standards.
Leases (ASU 2018-20, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-01, ASU 2017-13 and ASU 2016-02) – These updates are intended to increase
transparency and comparability for lease transactions. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance
sheet for all leases with an original term longer than twelve months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Lessor accounting is largely
unchanged. The updates are effective for the Company as of January 1, 2022. ASU 2016-02 required the adoption on a modified retrospective basis.
However, with the issuance of ASU 2018-11, we have the option to recognize the cumulative effect as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained
earnings in the year of adoption, while continuing to present all prior periods under the previous lease guidance. These updates provide optional practical
expedients in transition. The effect of applying the new lease guidance on the consolidated financial statements is expected to be minimal due to current
and future lease obligations being immaterial.
Financial Instruments Credit Losses (ASU 2018-19 and ASU 2016-13) – This update is designed to reduce complexity by limiting the number of
credit impairment models used for different assets. The model will result in accelerated credit loss recognition on assets held at amortized cost, which
includes our commercial and residential mortgage investments and reinsurance balances recoverable. The identification of credit-deteriorated securities will
include all assets that have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit since origination. Additionally, any changes in the expected cash
flows of credit-deteriorated securities will be recognized immediately in the income statement. AFS fixed maturity securities are not in scope of the new
credit loss model, but will undergo targeted improvements to the current reporting model including the establishment of a valuation allowance for credit
losses versus the current direct write down approach. We will be required to adopt this update effective January 1, 2023. We are currently evaluating the
impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
~ 71 ~
Table of Contents
S. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Certain risks and uncertainties are inherent to day-to-day operations and to the process of preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The more significant risks and uncertainties, as well as the Company’s attempt to mitigate, quantify, and minimize such risks, are presented below and
throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Catastrophe Exposures
The Company’s insurance coverages include exposure to catastrophic events. All catastrophe exposures are monitored by quantifying exposed policy
limits in each region and by using computer-assisted modeling techniques. Additionally, the Company limits its risk to such catastrophes through
restraining the total policy limits written in each region and by purchasing reinsurance. The Company’s major catastrophe exposure is to losses caused by
tornado/hail and freeze to commercial properties throughout the Midwest.
The Company had protection of $14 million in excess of $1 million for both the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. The catastrophe program is
actively managed to keep net retention in line with risk tolerances and to optimize the risk/return trade off. The catastrophe reinsurance treaty renewed on
January 1, 2022.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance does not discharge the Company from its primary liability to policyholders, and to the extent that a reinsurer is unable to meet its
obligations, the Company would be liable. On a quarterly basis, the financial condition of prospective and existing reinsurers is monitored. As a result, the
Company purchases reinsurance from several financially strong reinsurers. Accordingly, no allowance for reinsurance balances deemed uncollectible has
been made. See Note 6 –Reinsurance for further discussion.
Investment Risk
The investment portfolio is subject to market, credit, and interest rate risks. The equity portfolio will fluctuate with movements in the overall stock
market. While the equity portfolio has been constructed to have lower downside risk than the market, the portfolio is sensitive to movements in the market.
The bond portfolio is affected by interest rate changes and movement in credit spreads. The Company attempts to mitigate its interest rate and credit risks
by constructing a well-diversified portfolio with high-quality securities with varied maturities. Downturns in the financial markets could have a negative
effect on the portfolio. However, the Company attempts to manage this risk through asset allocation, duration, and security selection.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity is essential to the Company’s business and a key component of the concept of asset-liability matching. The Company’s liquidity may be
impaired by an inability to collect premium receivable or reinsurance recoverable balances in a timely manner, an inability to sell assets or redeem
investments, unforeseen outflows of cash or large claim payments, or an inability to access debt. Liquidity risk may arise due to circumstances that the
Company may be unable to control, such as a general market disruption, an operational problem that affects third parties or the Company, or even by the
perception among market participants that the Company, or other market participants, are experiencing greater liquidity risk.
The Company’s A.M. Best rating is important to its liquidity. A reduction in credit ratings could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and
competitive position by increasing borrowing costs or limiting access to the capital markets.
External Factors
The Company is highly regulated by the state of Illinois and by the states in which it underwrites business. Such regulations, among other things, limit
the amount of dividends, impose restrictions on the amount and types of investments, and regulate rates insurers may charge for various coverages. The
Company is also subject to insolvency and guarantee fund assessments for various programs designed to ensure policyholder indemnification. Assessments
are generally accrued during the period in which it becomes probable that a liability has been incurred from an insolvency and the amount of the related
assessment can be reasonably estimated.
~ 72 ~
Table of Contents
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has developed Property/Casualty Risk-Based Capital (RBC) standards that relate an
insurer’s reported statutory surplus to the risks inherent in its overall operations. The RBC formula uses the statutory annual statement to calculate the
minimum indicated capital level to support asset (investment and credit) risk and underwriting (loss reserves, premiums written and unearned premium)
risk. The NAIC model law calls for various levels of regulatory action based on the magnitude of an indicated RBC capital deficiency, if any. As of
December 31, 2021, the Company determined that its capital levels are well in excess of the minimum capital requirements for all RBC action levels and
that its capital levels are sufficient to support the level of risk inherent in its operations. See Note 10 – Statutory Information and Dividend Restrictions for
further discussion of statutory information and related insurance regulatory restrictions.
In addition, ratings are a critical factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. The Company is rated by A.M. Best. This
rating reflects their opinion of the insurance company’s financial strength, operating performance, strategic position, and ability to meet its obligations to
policyholders.
COVID-19 Risk
The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the U.S. and global economy; disrupted U.S. and global supply chains; lowered equity market
valuations; created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets; contributed to a decrease in the rates and yields on U.S. Treasury securities;
resulted in ratings downgrades, credit deterioration, and defaults in many industries; increased demands on capital and liquidity; and increased
unemployment levels and decreased consumer confidence. In addition, the pandemic has resulted in temporary closures of many businesses, especially
bars and restaurants, and the institution of social distancing and sheltering in place requirements in many states and communities, including those in our
footprint. The pandemic has caused us, and could continue to cause us, to recognize losses in our investment portfolios and increases in our allowance for
losses. Furthermore, the pandemic could cause us to recognize impairment of our financial assets. Sustained adverse effects may also increase our cost of
capital, prevent us from satisfying our minimum regulatory capital and surplus, or result in downgrades in our A.M. Best ratings. The extent to which the
COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly
uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic, the continued effectiveness of our business continuity plan, the direct
and indirect impact of the pandemic on our customers, colleagues, counterparties and service providers, and actions taken by governmental authorities and
other third parties in response to the pandemic.
Governmental authorities have taken significant measures to provide economic assistance to individual households and businesses, stabilize the
markets, and support economic growth. The success of these measures is unknown, and they may not be sufficient to fully mitigate the negative impact of
the pandemic. Additionally, some measures, such as a suspension of insurance premium payments and the reduction in interest rates to near zero, may have
a negative impact on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. We also may become subject to legislative and/or regulatory
action that retroactively mandates coverage for losses that our insurance policies were not intended or priced to cover, including business interruption
claims, despite terms included in our policies to preclude coverage or that creates presumptions of compensability not otherwise present (including for
example in workers’ compensations exposures). Regulatory requirements could also impact pricing, risk selection and our rights and obligations with
respect to our policies and insureds, including our ability to cancel policies, collect premiums, or requiring us to refund premiums in a manner not
otherwise required. We also face an increased risk of litigation and governmental and regulatory scrutiny as a result of the effects of the pandemic on
market and economic conditions and actions governmental authorities take in response to those conditions. These potential exposures include direct claims
relating to COVID-19 (e.g., business interruption following a shelter in place order) and indirect exposures arising from an economic downturn.
The length of the pandemic and the effectiveness of the measures put in place to address it are unknown. Until the effects of the pandemic subside, we
could experience reduced revenues in our businesses. To the extent the pandemic adversely affects our business, financial condition, liquidity, or results of
operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risks and Uncertainties” section and any subsequent
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
~ 73 ~
Table of Contents
2. INVESTMENTS
NET INVESTMENT INCOME
A summary of net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
AFS, fixed maturity securities
Investment property
Equity securities
Cash and short-term investments
Investment revenue
Less investment expenses
Net investment income
INVESTMENT RELATED GAINS (LOSSES)
2021
3,086,226 $
802,071
493,529
2,582
4,384,408
(970,000)
3,414,408 $
$
$
2020
2,975,341
770,981
556,920
34,460
4,337,702
(840,000)
3,497,702
The following is a summary of the proceeds from sales, maturities, and calls of fixed maturity and equity securities and the related gross realized gains
and losses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
2021
Fixed maturity securities
Common stocks
Preferred stocks
2020
Fixed maturity securities
Common stocks
Preferred stocks
Proceeds
Gains
Losses
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)
$
$
18,590,418 $
3,023,990
340,523
17,174,787 $
5,224,984
297,609
247,913 $
836,477
37,711
574,697 $
618,946
8,886
(9,582) $
(129,972)
—
(926) $
(1,435,514)
(11,412)
238,332
706,504
37,711
573,771
(816,568)
(2,526)
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed income securities at December 31, 2021, are shown as follows:
Due in one year or less
Due after one year through five years
Due after five years through 10 years
Due after 10 years
Asset and mortgage backed securities without a specific due date
Redeemable preferred stocks
Total fixed maturity securities
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
$
$
2,103,740 $
17,161,140
14,901,963
27,050,300
40,712,275
215,805
102,145,223 $
2,138,613
17,834,244
15,661,583
28,950,347
41,023,871
232,885
105,841,543
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to call provisions on some existing securities.
The following table is a schedule of amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments in securities classified as available for sale at December
31, 2021 and 2020.
2021
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Redeemable preferred stock
Total fixed maturity securities
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Gains
Losses
Gross Unrealized
$
$
1,352,044 $
40,712,275
38,959,905
20,905,194
215,805
102,145,223 $
1,345,992 $
41,023,871
41,206,964
22,031,831
232,885
105,841,543 $
11,276 $
607,483
2,434,738
1,149,998
17,080
4,220,575 $
(17,328)
(295,887)
(187,679)
(23,361)
—
(524,255)
~ 74 ~
Table of Contents
2020
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Redeemable preferred stock
Total fixed maturity securities
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Gains
Losses
Gross Unrealized
$
$
1,352,758 $
40,509,172
39,186,671
17,488,621
215,805
98,753,027 $
1,385,406 $
41,743,304
43,580,743
18,788,674
242,439
105,740,566 $
33,336 $
1,367,411
4,429,000
1,316,358
26,634
7,172,739 $
(688)
(133,279)
(34,928)
(16,305)
—
(185,200)
MORTGAGE-BACKED, COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED AND ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
All of the Company’s collateralized securities carry an average credit rating of AA+ by one or more major rating agency and continue to pay according
to contractual terms. Included within MBS/ABS/CMBS are residential mortgage backed securities with fair values of $14,975,101 and $16,220,343 and
commercial mortgage backed securities of $11,697,671 and $12,721,455 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
UNREALIZED LOSSES ON AFS SECURITIES
The following table is also used as part of the impairment analysis and displays the total value of securities that were in an unrealized loss position as
of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The table segregates the securities based on type, noting the fair value, amortized cost, and unrealized loss on each
category of investment as well as in total. The table further classifies the securities based on the length of time they have been in an unrealized loss
position.
Fixed Maturity Securities:
U.S. Treasury
Fair value
Amortized cost
Unrealized loss
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Fair value
Amortized cost
Unrealized loss
Corporate
Fair value
Amortized cost
Unrealized loss
Municipal
Fair value
Amortized cost
Unrealized loss
Total
Fair value
Amortized cost
Unrealized loss
< 12 Months
December 31, 2021
12 Months
& Greater
Total
< 12 Months
December 31, 2020
12 Months
& Greater
Total
$
$
391,250 $
400,408
(9,158)
20,403,757
20,647,568
(243,811)
6,428,166
6,590,227
(162,061)
2,676,052
2,695,269
(19,217)
29,899,225
30,333,472
(434,247) $
291,891 $
300,061
(8,170)
1,124,095
1,176,171
(52,076)
995,235
1,020,853
(25,618)
269,247
273,391
(4,144)
2,680,468
2,770,476
(90,008) $
683,141 $
700,469
(17,328)
21,527,852
21,823,739
(295,887)
7,423,401
7,611,080
(187,679)
2,945,299
2,968,660
(23,361)
299,391 $
300,078
(688)
7,120,339
7,236,360
(116,021)
1,739,691
1,774,619
(34,928)
756,678
772,984
(16,306)
— $
—
—
2,010,434
2,027,692
(17,258)
—
—
—
—
—
—
299,391
300,078
(688)
9,130,773
9,264,052
(133,279)
1,739,691
1,774,619
(34,928)
756,678
772,984
(16,306)
32,579,693
33,103,948
(524,255) $
9,916,099
10,084,041
(167,942) $
2,010,434
2,027,692
(17,258) $
11,926,533
12,111,733
(185,200)
The fixed income portfolio contained 55 securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2021. Of these 55 securities, 5 have been in an
unrealized loss position for 12 consecutive months or longer and represent $90,008 in unrealized losses. All fixed income securities in the investment
portfolio continue to pay the expected coupon payments under the contractual terms of the securities. Credit-related impairments on fixed income securities
that we do not plan to sell, and for which we are not more likely than not to be required to sell, are recognized in net earnings. Any non-credit related
impairment is recognized in comprehensive earnings. Based on management’s analysis, the fixed income portfolio is of a high credit quality and it is
believed it will recover the amortized cost basis of the fixed income securities. Management monitors the credit quality of the fixed income investments to
assess if it is probable that the Company will receive its contractual or estimated cash flows in the form of principal and interest.
There were no other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in net earnings during the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. For all fixed
income securities at a loss at December 31, 2021, management believes it is probable that the Company will receive all contractual payments in the form of
principal and interest. In addition, the Company is not required to, nor does it intend to sell these investments prior to recovering the entire amortized cost
basis for each security, which may
~ 75 ~
Table of Contents
be maturity. The fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position were not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2021 and December 31,
2020.
As required by law, certain fixed maturity investments amounting to $3,823,752 and $3,916,710 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, were on
deposit with either regulatory authorities or banks.
UNREALIZED GAINS AND LOSSES ON EQUITY SECURITIES
Net unrealized gains for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 for equity securities held as of December 31, 2021 and December 31,
2020 were $2,801,991 and $2,167,417, respectively.
OTHER INVESTED ASSETS
Other invested assets as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 were $3,086,568 and $1,772,867, respectively.
Other invested assets include membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLBC), which occurred in February 2018. As of December
31, 2021 and 2020, our investment in FHLBC stock was carried at cost of $300,000 and $200,000, respectively. Due to the nature of our membership in the
FHLBC, the carrying amount approximates fair value.
In addition, other invested assets as of December 31, 2021, include privately held investments of $1,720,502 and notes receivable of $1,066,066,
compared to $204,000 and $1,369,067, respectively, at December 31, 2020. The notes bear interest between 3.9% and 6.5%. As of December 31, 2021,
$315,076 in note payments were received and $12,075 in accrued escrow and interest receivable was recorded. Comparatively, as of December 31, 2020,
no note payments were received and no accrued escrow and interest receivable were recorded. The Company had no allowance recorded related to
uncollectible note receivables at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we agreed to commit up to $10.0 million to a private investment fund, subject to regulatory approval, which may be
callable from time to time by such fund. As of December 31, 2021, no calls were received.
PROPERTY HELD FOR INVESTMENT
As of December 31, 2021, investment property comprised of one storage facility in Davenport, Iowa and 52 rental units consisting of duplexes,
condos, senior living units, and a seven-plex property. These rentals are located in Colona, Illinois; East Moline, Illinois; Kissimmee, Florida; Milan,
Illinois; Moline, Illinois; Rock Island, Illinois; Silvis, Illinois; and Le Claire, Iowa. In addition, we own and operate twelve single-family homes located in
Colona, Illinois; East Moline, Illinois; Rock Island, Illinois; and Silvis, Illinois. As of December 31, 2020, investment property comprised of one storage
facility in Davenport, Iowa and 65 apartment rental units located in Milan, Illinois; Moline, Illinois; Rock Island, Illinois; Silvis, Illinois; and Le Claire,
Iowa. Property held for investment is net of accumulated depreciation of $464,713 and $465,364 as of December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Related
depreciation expense was $145,237 and $144,545 for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
3. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Fair value is defined as the price in the principal market that would be received for an asset to facilitate an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. We determined the fair value of certain financial instruments based on their underlying characteristics and relevant
transactions in the marketplace. GAAP guidance requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. The guidance also describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.
The following are the levels of the fair value hierarchy and a brief description of the type of valuation inputs that are used to establish each level:
(cid:0) Level 1 is applied to valuations based on readily available, unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
(cid:0) Level 2 is applied to valuations based upon quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in
inactive markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable (e.g. interest rates, yield curves, prepayment
speeds, default rates, loss severities) or can be corroborated by observable market data.
~ 76 ~
Table of Contents
(cid:0) Level 3 is applied to valuations that are derived from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs are unobservable. Financial
assets are classified based upon the lowest level of significant input that is used to determine fair value.
As a part of the process to determine fair value, management utilizes widely recognized, third-party pricing sources to determine fair values.
Management has obtained an understanding of the third-party pricing sources’ valuation methodologies and inputs. The following is a description of the
valuation techniques used for financial assets that are measured at fair value, including the general classification of such assets pursuant to the fair value
hierarchy.
Corporate, Agencies, and Municipal Bonds—The pricing vendor employs a multi-dimensional model which uses standard inputs including (listed in
order of priority for use) benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, market
bids/offers and other reference data. The pricing vendor also monitors market indicators, as well as industry and economic events. All bonds valued using
these techniques are classified as Level 2. All Corporate, Agencies, and Municipal securities are deemed Level 2.
Mortgage-backed Securities (MBS), Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO), Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities (CMBS) and
Asset-backed Securities (ABS)—The pricing vendor evaluation methodology includes principally interest rate movements and new issue data. Evaluation
of the tranches (non-volatile, volatile, or credit sensitivity) is based on the pricing vendors’ interpretation of accepted modeling and pricing conventions.
This information is then used to determine the cash flows for each tranche, benchmark yields, pre-payment assumptions and to incorporate collateral
performance. To evaluate CMO volatility, an option-adjusted spread model is used in combination with models that simulate interest rate paths to
determine market price information. This process allows the pricing vendor to obtain evaluations of a broad universe of securities in a way that reflects
changes in yield curve, index rates, implied volatility, mortgage rates, and recent trade activity. MBS, CMBS, CMO and ABS with corroborated and
observable inputs are classified as Level 2. All MBS, CMBS, CMO and ABS holdings are deemed Level 2.
U.S. Treasury Bonds, Common Stocks, and Exchange Traded Funds—U.S. treasury bonds and exchange traded equities have readily observable
price levels and are classified as Level 1 (fair value based on quoted market prices). All common stock holdings are deemed Level 1.
Preferred Stock—Preferred stocks do not have readily observable prices, but do have quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active; and inputs other than quoted prices are classified as Level 2. All preferred stock
holdings are deemed Level 2.
Due to the relatively short-term nature of cash and cash equivalents, their carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of fair value. Other invested assets
as well as debt obligations are carried at cost and given that there is no readily available market for these to trade in, management believes that cost
accurately reflects fair value.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021, are as summarized below:
AFS securities
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Redeemable preferred stocks
Total fixed maturity securities
Equity securities
Common stocks
Perpetual preferred stocks
Total equity securities
$
Total marketable investments measured at fair value
$
Quoted in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
1,345,992 $
— $
—
—
—
—
1,345,992
41,023,871
41,206,964
22,031,831
232,885
104,495,551
23,608,197
—
23,608,197
24,954,189 $
—
2,780,450
2,780,450
107,276,001 $
~ 77 ~
Total
1,345,992
41,023,871
41,206,964
22,031,831
232,885
105,841,543
23,608,197
2,780,450
26,388,647
132,230,190
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
Table of Contents
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020, are as summarized below:
AFS securities
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. treasury
MBS/ABS/CMBS
Corporate
Municipal
Redeemable preferred stocks
Total fixed maturity securities
Equity securities
Common stocks
Perpetual preferred stocks
Total equity securities
$
Total marketable investments measured at fair value
$
4. POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
Quoted in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
1,385,406 $
— $
—
—
—
—
1,385,406
41,743,304
43,580,743
18,788,674
242,439
104,355,160
14,724,814
—
14,724,814
16,110,220 $
—
1,683,892
1,683,892
106,039,052 $
Total
1,385,406
41,743,304
43,580,743
18,788,674
242,439
105,740,566
14,724,814
1,683,892
16,408,706
122,149,272
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
Policy acquisition costs deferred and amortized to income for the years ended December 31 are summarized as follows:
Deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), beginning of year
Deferred:
Direct commission
Premium taxes
Ceding commissions
Underwriting
Net deferred
Amortized
DAC, end of year
Policy acquisition costs:
Amortized to expense
Period costs:
Contingent commission
Other underwriting expenses
Total policy acquisition costs
~ 78 ~
2021
2020
$
5,429,620 $
5,269,256
10,772,089
1,215,613
(827,540)
1,003,215
12,163,377
11,054,153
6,538,844 $
8,804,039
1,145,935
(762,528)
1,007,055
10,194,501
10,034,137
5,429,620
$
$
11,054,153 $
10,034,137
1,463,505
8,307,242
20,824,900 $
746,518
7,748,791
18,529,446
$
Table of Contents
5. DEBT
Debt Obligation
ICC Holdings, Inc. secured a loan with a commercial bank in March 2017 in the amount of $3.5 million and used the proceeds to repay ICC for the
money borrowed by the ESOP. The term of the loan is five years bearing interest at 3.65%. The Company pledged stock and $1.0 million of marketable
assets as collateral for the loan.
The Company also has borrowing capacity up to approximately $37 million in the aggregate from its membership with the Federal Home Loan Bank
of Chicago (FHLBC).
As part of the Company’s response to COVID-19, the Company obtained, in March 2020, a $6.0 million loan from the FHLBC as a precautionary
measure to increase its cash position, to provide increased liquidity, and to compensate for potential reductions in premium receivable collections. The term
of the loan is five years bearing interest at 1.4%. The Company pledged $6.8 million of fixed income securities as collateral for this loan.
The Company’s $4.0 million, 0% interest, one year FHLBC loan, obtained in May 2020, matured on May 3, 2021. On this date, a new $4.0 million,
0.74% fixed interest, one year FHLBC loan became effective. Collateral totaling $7.4 million supports both the $6.0 million and $4.0 million outstanding
FHLBC loans and consists of fixed income securities.
A one year FHLBC loan for $5.0 million, 0% interest was entered into on May 28, 2021. Upon maturity in May 2022, this loan will rollover to a
$5.0 million, 1.36% fixed interest loan. Collateral totaling $5.8 million supports this new FHLBC loan and consists of fixed income securities.
The total balance of the debt agreements at year end 2021 and 2020 was $18,455,342 and $13,465,574, respectively. The average interest rate on
remaining debt was 1.3% as of December 31, 2021 and 1.6% as of December 31, 2020.
Revolving Line of Credit
We maintained a revolving line of credit with a commercial bank, which permitted borrowing up to an aggregate principal amount of $1.75 million.
This facility was initially entered into during 2013 and expired August 5, 2020. The line of credit was priced at 30-day LIBOR plus 2% with a floor of
3.5%. In order to secure the lowest rate possible, the Company pledged marketable securities not to exceed $5.0 million in the event the Company would
draw down on the line of credit. There were no financial covenants governing this agreement.
Effective August 2020, the Company replaced its expired line of credit with a $2.0 million revolving line of credit with another commercial bank,
which renews annually and has a current expiration date of July 2022. This new line of credit is priced at Prime plus 0.5%. The Company pledged
$2.0 million of business assets in the event the Company draws down on the line of credit. This line of credit agreement includes a financial debt covenant
requiring a minimum total adjusted capital of $21.0 million. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with its financial debt covenant.
There was no interest paid on these lines of credit during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
6. REINSURANCE
In the ordinary course of business, the Company assumes and cedes premiums and selected insured risks with other insurance companies, known as
reinsurance. A large portion of the reinsurance is put into effect under contracts known as treaties and, in some instances, by negotiation on each individual
risk (known as facultative reinsurance). In addition, there are several types of treaties including quota share, excess of loss and catastrophe reinsurance
contracts that protect against losses over stipulated amounts arising from any one occurrence or event. The arrangements allow the Company to pursue
greater diversification of business and serve to limit the maximum net loss to a single event, such as a catastrophe. Through the quantification of exposed
policy limits in each region and the extensive use of computer-assisted modeling techniques, management monitors the concentration of risks exposed to
catastrophic events.
Through the purchase of reinsurance, the Company also generally limits its net loss on any individual risk to a maximum of $1,000,000 for casualty
and workers’ compensation business and $750,000 for property, although certain treaties contain an annual aggregate deductible before reinsurance applies.
~ 79 ~
Table of Contents
Premiums, written and earned, along with losses and settlement expenses incurred for the years ended December 31 are summarized as follows:
2021
2020
WRITTEN
Direct
Reinsurance assumed
Reinsurance ceded
Net
EARNED
Direct
Reinsurance assumed
Reinsurance ceded
Net
LOSS AND SETTLEMENT EXPENSES INCURRED
Direct
Reinsurance assumed
Reinsurance ceded
Net
$
$
$
$
$
$
71,091,961
78,699
(10,960,325)
60,210,335
64,652,638
94,590
(10,854,208)
53,893,020
45,685,603
47,536
(11,033,596)
34,699,543
$
$
$
$
$
$
58,982,300
183,204
(10,118,373)
49,047,131
59,587,071
182,416
(10,080,285)
49,689,202
47,067,297
73,597
(14,578,906)
32,561,988
The reinsurance assumed business consists of assigned risk pools, which require the Company to participate in certain workers’ compensation and
other liability pools, as a result of their licensure and premium writings in the various states in which it does business.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and settlement expenses totaling $14,521,219 and
$13,019,865, respectively. All of the Company’s reinsurance recoverables are due from companies with financial strength ratings of “A” or better by A.M.
Best.
The following table displays net reinsurance balances recoverable, after consideration of collateral, on paid losses and settlement expenses, known case
and IBNR loss and settlement expense reserves, unearned premiums, and contingent commissions from the Company’s top 10 reinsurers as of December
31, 2021. These reinsurers all have financial strength ratings of “A” or better by A.M. Best. Also shown are the amounts of written premium ceded to these
reinsurers during the calendar year 2021.
(In thousands)
Platinum Underwriters
Hannover Rückversicherungs
Aspen Insurance UK Ltd
Partner Reinsurance Company
Everest Reinsurance Company
Swiss Reinsurance
Endurance Reinsurance
General Reinsurance Corporation
Axis Reins Company
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
All other reinsurers including anticipated subrogation
A.M. Best
Rating
A+
A+
A
A+
A+
A+
A+
A++
A
A
$
$
Net Reinsurer
Exposure as of
December 31, 2021
Percent of
Percent of
Ceded
Premiums
Written
2,901
2,073
1,824
1,514
1,196
1,162
867
774
742
656
2,206
15,915
Total
18.2% $
13.0%
11.5%
9.5%
7.5%
7.3%
5.4%
4.9%
4.7%
4.1%
13.9%
100.0% $
2,317
1,274
292
303
271
286
306
1,537
270
827
3,277
10,960
Total
21.1%
11.6%
2.7%
2.8%
2.5%
2.6%
2.8%
14.0%
2.6%
7.5%
29.9%
100.1%
Ceded unearned premiums and reinsurance balances recoverable on paid losses and settlement expenses are reported separately as an asset, rather than
being netted with the related liability, since reinsurance does not relieve the Company of its liability to policyholders. Such balances are subject to the credit
risk associated with the individual reinsurer. On a quarterly basis, the financial condition of the Company’s reinsurers is monitored. As part of the
monitoring efforts, management reviews annual summarized financial data and publicly available information. The credit risk associated with the
reinsurance balances recoverable is analyzed by monitoring the A.M. Best and S&P ratings of the reinsurers. In addition, the Company subjects its
reinsurance recoverables to detailed recoverability tests, including one based on average default by A.M. Best rating.
~ 80 ~
Table of Contents
Once regulatory action (such as receivership, finding of insolvency, order of conservation or order of liquidation) is taken against a reinsurer, the paid
and unpaid recoverable for the reinsurer are specifically identified and written off through the use of the allowance for estimated unrecoverable amounts
from reinsurers. When such a balance is written off, it is done in full. The Company then re-evaluates the remaining allowance and determines whether the
balance is sufficient as detailed above, and if needed, an additional allowance is recognized and income charged. The Company had no allowance recorded
related to uncollectible amounts on paid and unpaid recoverables at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The Company has no receivables with a due date that
extends beyond 90 days from the date of billing that are not included in the allowance for uncollectible amounts.
~ 81 ~
Table of Contents
7. UNPAID LOSSES AND SETTLEMENT EXPENSES
Loss Development Tables
The following tables represent cumulative incurred losses and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance, by accident year and cumulative paid loss and
settlement expenses, net of reinsurance, by accident year, for the years ended December 31, 2012 to 2021, as well as total IBNR and the cumulative number
of reported claims for the year ended December 31, 2020. The information about incurred and paid claims development for the years ended December 31,
2012 to 2020, is presented as unaudited required supplementary information. The property line of business has been disaggregated based on the shorter
payout period in comparison to the workers compensation and liability lines of business.
Incurred loss and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance (in thousands)
As of December 31, 2021
Year Ended December 31,
PROPERTY LINES
2012*
2013*
2014*
2015*
2016*
2017*
2018*
2019*
2020*
2021
Total IBNR
plus expected
development
on reported
claims
$
6,143 $
6,374 $
9,266
6,406 $
8,302
8,865
6,546 $
8,290
7,586
7,693
6,482 $
8,415
7,798
7,494
8,941
6,411 $
8,471
7,883
7,717
7,981
13,993
6,455 $
8,282
7,817
7,634
8,372
13,568
11,454
6,167 $
8,272
7,785
7,654
8,381
13,741
11,114
13,933
6,161 $
8,270
7,784
7,636
8,404
13,825
10,966
14,758
13,997
Total$
6,161 $
8,275
7,792
7,635
8,327
13,622
11,030
14,976
15,056
12,968
105,842
—
11
-
10
146
24
32
81
258
(9)
Cumulative
number of
reported claims
668
626
740
554
576
715
725
833
933
701
Accident
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012*
4,949 $
Accident Year
2012
$
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Cumulative paid loss and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2013*
2014*
2015*
2016*
2017*
2018*
2019*
2020*
2021
6,401 $
6,856
6,369 $
8,079
6,243
6,362 $
8,200
7,631
5,057
6,326 $
8,238
7,746
7,040
6,157
6,472 $
8,265
7,796
7,474
7,624
10,055
6,469 $
8,272
7,795
7,645
8,236
13,482
8,487
6,176 $
8,271
7,795
7,660
8,356
13,610
11,009
11,621
6,176 $
8,270
7,801
7,657
8,437
13,595
11,025
14,161
10,620
Total
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - years 2012 through 2021
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - prior to 2012
Unpaid loss and settlement expense, net of reinsurance$
6,176
8,271
7,803
7,645
8,465
13,363
11,062
14,855
14,485
11,220
103,345
2,497
(36)
2,461
*Presented as unaudited required supplementary information.
~ 82 ~
Table of Contents
Incurred loss and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance (in thousands)
As of December 31, 2021
WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY LINES
Year Ended December 31,
Accident
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012*
13,122 $
$
2013*
11,338 $
12,584
2014*
11,407 $
13,559
13,385
2015*
11,638 $
13,169
14,744
16,596
2016*
12,692 $
12,960
15,341
13,876
16,677
2017*
12,845 $
13,696
16,718
13,440
14,843
15,808
2018*
12,632 $
13,858
16,881
13,862
16,240
15,803
18,308
2019*
12,836 $
14,076
16,996
14,486
16,855
15,842
17,122
19,630
Total IBNR plus
expected
development on
reported claims
10
11
98
85
(9)
558
1,553
3,292
3,925
10,905
2021
12,910 $
14,144
16,929
15,182
18,413
17,067
16,925
19,575
14,106
21,000
166,251
Cumulative
number of
reported
claims
1,155
1,145
1,213
1,094
1,041
1,039
1,126
1,089
615
689
2020*
12,801 $
14,081
16,953
14,714
17,547
15,977
17,082
19,200
17,359
Total$
2012*
1,180 $
Accident Year
2012
$
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Cumulative paid loss and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2013*
2014*
2015*
2016*
2017*
2018*
2019*
2020*
2021
3,021 $
1,579
5,589 $
4,156
1,539
8,327 $
7,634
4,087
1,408
10,913 $
10,423
9,515
4,319
1,497
11,753 $
12,181
13,602
7,404
5,488
1,523
12,156 $
12,980
15,232
10,528
8,189
5,419
1,964
12,572 $
13,565
15,912
12,487
12,205
8,753
5,656
3,664
12,698 $
13,741
16,374
13,262
14,206
11,878
9,312
7,453
2,435
Total
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - years 2012 through 2021
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - prior to 2012
Unpaid loss and settlement expense, net of reinsurance$
12,887
13,974
16,401
13,932
16,649
14,771
12,419
12,132
4,882
3,520
121,567
44,685
168
44,853
*Presented as unaudited required supplementary information.
~ 83 ~
Table of Contents
Incurred loss and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance (in thousands)
As of December 31, 2021
Year Ended December 31,
TOTAL LINES
Accident
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012*
19,265 $
$
2013*
17,712 $
21,850
2014*
17,813 $
21,861
22,250
2015*
18,184 $
21,459
22,330
24,289
2016*
19,174 $
21,375
23,139
21,370
25,618
2017*
19,256 $
22,167
24,601
21,157
22,824
29,801
2018*
19,087 $
22,140
24,698
21,496
24,612
29,371
29,762
2019*
19,003 $
22,348
24,781
22,140
25,236
29,583
28,236
33,563
2020*
18,962 $
22,351
24,737
22,350
25,951
29,802
28,048
33,958
31,356
Total$
2021
19,071 $
22,419
24,721
22,817
26,740
30,689
27,955
34,551
29,162
33,968
272,093
Total IBNR
plus expected
development
on reported
claims
Cumulative
number of
reported claims
1,823
1,771
1,953
1,648
1,617
1,754
1,851
1,922
1,548
1,390
10
22
98
95
137
582
1,585
3,373
4,183
10,896
2012*
6,129 $
Accident Year
2012
$
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Cumulative paid loss and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2013*
2014*
2015*
2016*
2017*
2018*
2019*
2020*
2021
9,422 $
8,435
11,958 $
12,235
7,782
14,689 $
15,834
11,718
6,465
17,239 $
18,661
17,261
11,359
7,654
18,225 $
20,446
21,398
14,878
13,112
11,578
18,625 $
21,252
23,027
18,173
16,425
18,901
10,451
18,748 $
21,836
23,707
20,147
20,561
22,363
16,665
15,285
18,874 $
22,011
24,175
20,919
22,643
25,473
20,337
21,614
13,055
Total
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - years 2012 through 2021
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - prior to 2012
Unpaid loss and settlement expense, net of reinsurance$
19,063
22,245
24,204
21,577
25,114
28,134
23,481
26,987
19,367
14,740
224,912
47,182
132
47,314
*Presented as unaudited required supplementary information.
The following table reconciles the loss development information to the consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2021, by
reportable segment.
(In thousands)
Net unpaid losses and settlement expense
Property Lines
Workers' Compensation and Liability Lines
Total unpaid losses and settlement expense, net of reinsurance
Reinsurance recoverable on losses and settlement expense
Property Lines
Workers' Compensation and Liability Lines
Total reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and settlement expense
Total gross unpaid losses and LAE
Loss Duration Disclosure
December 31, 2021
2,461
44,853
47,314
4,313
10,208
14,521
61,835
$
$
The following table represents the average annual percentage payout of incurred losses by age, net of reinsurance and is presented as unaudited
required supplementary information.
Year 1
Year 2
Average annual percentage payout of incurred losses by age, net of reinsurance
Year 5
Year 4
Year 7
Year 6
Year 3
Property Lines
Liability Lines
Total Lines
75.1%
12.0%
36.6%
22.5%
20.6%
21.8%
1.4%
23.1%
13.9%
~ 84 ~
0.0%
19.9%
12.0%
0.0%
10.8%
6.5%
1.7%
5.4%
3.9%
-0.4%
3.4%
2.1%
Year 8
Year 9+
0.0%
2.2%
1.5%
-0.1%
2.5%
1.7%
Table of Contents
The following table is a reconciliation of the Company’s unpaid losses and settlement expenses for the years 2021 and 2020.
(In thousands)
Unpaid losses and settlement expense - beginning of the period:
Gross
Less: Ceded
Net
Increase in incurred losses and settlement expense:
Current year
Prior years
Total incurred
Deduct: Loss and settlement expense payments for claims incurred:
Current year
Prior years
Total paid
Net unpaid losses and settlement expense - end of the period
Plus: Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
Gross unpaid losses and settlement expense - end of the period
2021
2020
61,576 $
13,020
48,556
33,968
732
34,700
14,740
21,203
35,943
47,314
14,521
61,835 $
56,838
11,036
45,802
31,356
1,206
32,562
13,054
16,754
29,808
48,556
13,020
61,576
$
$
Differences, from the initial reserve estimates, emerged as changes in the ultimate loss estimates were updated through the reserve analysis process.
The recognition of the changes in initial reserve estimates occurred over time as claims were reported, initial case reserves were established, initial reserves
were reviewed in light of additional information and ultimate payments were made on the collective set of claims incurred as of that evaluation date. The
new information on the ultimate settlement value of claims is updated until all claims in a defined set are settled. As a small specialty insurer with a niche
product portfolio, the Company’s experience will ordinarily exhibit fluctuations from period to period. While management attempts to identify and react to
systematic changes in the loss environment, it must also consider the volume of experience directly available to the Company and interpret any particular
period’s indications with a realistic technical understanding of the reliability of those observations.
A discussion of significant components of reserve development for the two most recent calendar years follows:
2021
For calendar year 2021, the Company experienced unfavorable development relative to prior years’ reserve estimates in both its property and liability
lines of business relating to Businessowners Property 2020 accident year claims and Businessowners Liability 2017 accident year claims, respectively.
These adverse developments were largely offset by favorable development in Workers’ Compensation 2020 accident year claims.
2020
For calendar year 2020, the Company experienced unfavorable development relative to prior years’ reserve estimates in both its property and liability
lines of business relating to Businessowners Property 2019 accident year claims and Businessowners Liability 2016 accident year claims, respectively.
These adverse developments were largely offset by favorable development in Liquor Liability.
~ 85 ~
Table of Contents
8. INCOME TAXES
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are summarized as
follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Tax discounting of claim reserves
Unearned premium reserve
Deferred compensation
Provision for uncollectible accounts
Other
Deferred tax assets before allowance
Less valuation allowance
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Transition Adjustment for Loss Reserve Discounting
Net unrealized appreciation of securities
Deferred policy acquisition costs
Property and equipment
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax liability
December 31,
2021
2020
829,619 $
1,503,989
237,599
21,000
101,166
2,693,373
—
2,693,373 $
150,784 $
1,938,542
1,373,157
100,399
85,353
3,648,235
(954,862) $
834,092
1,236,617
152,646
31,500
(31,340)
2,223,515
—
2,223,515
188,480
2,099,499
1,140,220
22,963
3,624
3,454,786
(1,231,271)
$
$
$
$
In July 2019, the Treasury issued Rev Proc 2019-31, which included final revised loss reserve discounting factors and transitional guidance necessary
to complete the accounting for the impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The transitional adjustment for loss reserve discounting was recalculated as of
January 1, 2018 and the resulting adjustment is being recognized in taxable income evenly over an eight-year period beginning in 2018.
Management believes it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be recovered as the result of future operations, which will generate
sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset.
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal tax rate of
21% to pretax income from continuing operations as demonstrated in the following table:
Provision for income taxes at the statutory federal tax rates
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness
Dividends received deduction
Tax-exempt interest income
Proration of tax-exempt interest and dividends received deduction
Nondeductible expenses
Officer life insurance, net
Prior year true-up and other
Total
For the Year Ended December 31,
2020
2021
$
1,041,155 $
—
(34,207)
(58,153)
22,359
48,155
188
(204,395)
815,102 $
$
961,455
(344,673)
(29,474)
(61,956)
22,199
41,418
5,784
452,240
1,046,993
The Company’s effective tax rate was 16.4% and 22.9% for 2021 and 2020, respectively. Effective rates are dependent upon components of pretax
earnings and the related tax effects.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company does not have any capital or operating loss carryforwards. Periods still subject to Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) audit include 2018 through current year. There are currently no open tax exams.
~ 86 ~
Table of Contents
9. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
401(K) AND BONUS AND INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company maintains a 401(k) and bonus and incentive plans covering executives, managers, and employees. Excluding the 401(k), at the CEO’s
discretion, funding of these plans is primarily dependent upon reaching predetermined levels of combined ratio, reduction in operating expenses, growth in
direct written premium, and overall renewal retention ratios. Bonuses are earned as the Company generates earnings in excess of this required return. While
some management incentive plans may be affected somewhat by other performance factors, the larger influence of corporate performance ensures that the
interests of the executives, managers, and employees corresponds with those of the stakeholders.
The 401(k) plan offers a matching percentage up to 4% of eligible compensation, as well as a profit sharing percentage of each employee’s
compensation. Participants are 100% vested in the matching percentage and vest at a rate of 25% per year for the profit sharing distribution. The total
contribution to the 401(k) profit sharing plan was $272,527 and $266,024 for 2021 and 2020, respectively. Additionally, bonuses may be awarded to
executives, managers, and associates through company incentive plans, provided certain financial or operational goals are met.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
In November 2012, the Company entered into a deferred compensation agreement with an executive of the Company. The agreement requires the
Company to make payments to the executive beginning at retirement (age 62). In the event of separation of service without cause prior to age 62, benefits
under this agreement vest 25% in November 2017, 50% in November 2022, 75% in November 2027, and 100% on January 1, 2032. In the event of death
prior to retirement, benefits become fully vested and are payable to the executive’s beneficiaries. Using a discount rate of 3.6%, the fully vested obligation
under the agreement would total approximately $1,689,467 on January 1, 2032. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the accrued liability related to this
agreement totaled $529,117 and $470,446, respectively. The Company recognized $58,671 and $122,459 of expense in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
ESOP
In connection with our conversion and public offering, we established an ESOP. The ESOP borrowed from the Company to purchase 350,000 shares
in the offering. The issuance of the shares to the ESOP resulted in a contra account established in the equity section of the balance sheet for the unallocated
shares at an amount equal to their $10.00 per share purchase price.
The Company may make discretionary contributions to the ESOP and pay dividends on unallocated shares to the ESOP. The ESOP uses funds it
receives to repay the loan. When loan payments are made, ESOP shares are allocated to participants based on relative compensation and expense is
recorded. The Company contributed $293,862 and $294,734 to the ESOP during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
A compensation expense charge is booked monthly during each year for the shares committed to be allocated to participants that year, determined with
reference to the fair market value of our stock at the time the commitment to allocate the shares is accrued and recognized. For the year ended December
31, 2021, we recognized compensation expense of $369,773 related to 23,437 shares of our common stock that were committed to be released to
participants’ accounts for the year ended December 31, 2021. Of the 23,437 shares committed to be released, 1,926 shares were committed on December
31, 2021 and had no impact on the weighted average common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2021. For the year ended December 31,
2020, we recognized compensation expense of $283,222 related to 23,437 shares of our common stock that were committed to be released to participants’
accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020. Of the 23,437 shares committed to be released, 1,985 shares were committed on December 31, 2020 and
had no impact on the weighted average common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2020. The fair value of the unearned ESOP shares as
of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $3,925,770 and $3,686,702, respectively.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
RSUs were granted for the first time in February 2018 with additional RSUs being granted in March 2019, April 2020, and April 2021. RSUs have a
grant date value equal to the closing price of the Company’s stock on the dates the shares are granted. The RSUs vest 1/3 over three years from the date of
grant.
~ 87 ~
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2021, 11,700, 13,071, 18,040 and 15,000 RSUs have been granted at a fair market value of $15.10, $13.70, $11.03 and $14.78 per
share, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, 11,700, 13,071 and 18,040 RSUs have been granted at a fair market value of $15.10, $13.70 and $11.03 per
share, respectively. We recognized $186,897 and $171,755 of expense on these units in the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. Total unrecognized compensation expense relating to outstanding and unvested RSUs was $254,837 and $269,359 as of December 31, 2021,
respectively, which is recognized over the remainder of the three year vesting periods.
10. STATUTORY INFORMATION AND DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS
The statutory financial statements of ICC are presented on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Illinois Department of
Insurance, which has adopted the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) statutory accounting practices as the basis of its statutory
accounting practices. ICC did not use any permitted statutory accounting practices that differ from NAIC prescribed statutory accounting practices. In
converting from statutory to GAAP, typical adjustments include deferral of policy acquisition costs, the inclusion of statutory non-admitted assets,
recording debt securities at fair value versus amortized cost, net unrealized gains or losses on equity securities are recorded in earnings as opposed to being
a component of surplus, and the reclassification of surplus notes from equity to debt.
The NAIC has Risk-Based Capital (RBC) standards that require insurance companies to calculate and report information under a risk-based formula,
which measures statutory capital and surplus needs based upon a regulatory definition of risk relative to the Company’s balance sheet and mix of products.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, ICC had RBC amounts in excess of the authorized control level RBC, as defined by the NAIC. ICC’s statutory capital
and surplus as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $62,511,840 and $58,801,101, respectively.
The following table includes selected information for our insurance subsidiary:
Net income, statutory basis
Surplus, statutory basis
As of and Periods Ended December 31,
2021
1,938,995 $
62,511,840 $
2020
2,255,503
58,801,101
$
$
No Illinois domiciled company may pay any extraordinary dividend or make any other extraordinary distribution to its security holders until: (a) 30
days after the Director has received notice of the declaration thereof and has not within such period disapproved the payment, or (b) the Director approves
such payment within the 30-day period. For purposes of this subsection, an extraordinary dividend or distribution is any dividend or distribution of cash or
other property whose fair market value, together with that of other dividends or distributions, made within the period of 12 consecutive months ending on
the date on which the proposed dividend is scheduled for payment or distribution exceeds the greater of: (a) 10% of the Company’s surplus as regards
policyholders as of the 31st day of December next preceding, or (b) the net income of the Company for the 12-month period ending the 31st day of
December next preceding, but does not include pro rata distributions of any class of the Company’s own securities. As of December 31, 2021, the amount
available for payment of dividends by ICC in 2021 without the prior approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance is approximately $6.3 million. ICC
paid dividends of $800,000 and $500,000 to ICC Holdings, Inc. in April 2021 and March 2020, respectively.
The Company did not pay any dividends to security holders in 2021 or 2020. It did, however, make cash dividend payments in the amount of $5,563
and $13,156 in 2021 and 2020, respectively, to Wisconsin policyholders in accordance with policy contractual obligations.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company is party to numerous claims, losses, and litigation matters that arise in the normal course of business. Many of such claims, losses, or
litigation matters involve claims under policies that the Company underwrites as an insurer. Management believes that the resolution of these claims and
losses will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company agreed to commit up to $10.0 million to a private investment fund. See Other Invested Assets within
Note 2 – Investments for more information.
The Company has operating obligations related to managing the business. Minimum future payments under cancellable agreements total $45,000 and
$41,324 in 2022 and 2021, respectively.
~ 88 ~
Table of Contents
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.
In early March 2022, the Company applied for, and received, a forty-day extension for payoff of its $3.5 million commercial loan with an original due
date of March 28th. This payoff will be serviced by an intercompany loan in the second quarter between ICC and the Parent Company.
~ 89 ~
ICC HOLDINGS, INC.
Schedule II — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Balance Sheet – Parent Company Only
As of
December 31, 2021
As of
December 31, 2020
Table of Contents
Assets
Investment in subsidiaries
Fixed maturity securities
Common Stocks
Other invested assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Due from subsidiaries
Accrued investment income
Income taxes - current
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Debt
Accrued expenses
Income taxes - deferred
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity:
$
$
$
$
74,209,041 $
3,223,307
1,410,345
218,403
573,715
64,846
13,746
454,538
359,575
80,527,515 $
5,515,098 $
116,894
56,016
135,592
5,823,601
35,000
(3,155,399)
32,965,136
2,920,027
44,282,895
(2,343,745)
74,703,914
80,527,514 $
76,680,023
3,238,560
1,115,545
201,900
462,185
81,166
14,002
387,407
264,622
82,445,410
9,059,767
44,176
73,663
524,115
9,701,721
35,000
(3,153,838)
32,780,436
5,520,091
40,140,115
(2,578,115)
72,743,689
82,445,410
Common stock1
Treasury stock, at cost
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of tax
Retained earnings
Less: Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares at cost2
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
1Par value $0.01; authorized: 2021 - 10,000,000 shares and 2020 -10,000,000 shares; issued: 2021 - 3,500,000 shares and 2020 - 3,500,000 shares;
outstanding: 2021 - 3,291,852 shares and 2020 - 3,291,125 shares
22021 - 208,148 shares and 2020 - 208,875 shares
32021 - 234,374 shares and 2020 - 257,811 shares
~ 90 ~
Table of Contents
ICC HOLDINGS, INC.
Schedule II — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Statement of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings – Parent Company Only
Net investment income
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Net unrealized gains on equity securities
Other income (loss)
Total revenue
Policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses
Interest expense on debt
General corporate expenses
Total expenses
Loss before equity earnings of subsidiaries and income taxes
Total income tax benefit
Net loss before equity earnings of subsidiaries
Equity earnings in subsidiaries
Net earnings
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax
Equity in other comprehensive (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
Comprehensive earnings
~ 91 ~
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
$
$
$
139,907 $
39,629
234,537
6,717
420,790
1,676,944
129,854
7,767
1,814,566
(1,393,776)
(54,646)
(1,339,130)
5,481,909
4,142,779 $
(78,861)
(2,521,202)
1,542,715 $
67,727
(79,924)
85,397
(99,008)
(25,808)
1,439,908
128,786
875
1,569,570
(1,595,378)
(387,336)
(1,208,042)
4,739,406
3,531,364
111,334
2,454,821
6,097,519
Table of Contents
ICC HOLDINGS, INC.
Schedule II — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Statement of Cash Flows – Parent Company Only
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities
Net realized and unrealized gains on equity securities
Depreciation
Deferred income tax
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Amortization of bond premium and discount
Stock-based compensation expense
Change in:
Intercompany notes receivable
Due from subsidiaries
Accrued investment income
Accrued expenses
Current federal income tax
Other
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Contributions from subsidiaries
Purchases of:
Fixed maturity securities
Common stocks
Other invested assets
Property and equipment
Proceeds from sales, maturities and calls of:
Fixed maturity securities
Common stocks
Other invested assets
Property and equipment
Net cash provided by investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of borrowed funds
Purchase of treasury stock
Net cash used in financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental information:
Federal income tax paid
Interest paid
$
$
~ 92 ~
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
$
4,142,779 $
3,531,364
(274,166)
51,235
3,316
(5,481,909)
—
419,070
(1,380,000)
16,321
255
72,719
(67,131)
(476,240)
(2,973,750)
6,605,654
(312,114)
(216,473)
—
—
220,950
195,840
16,403
121,249
6,631,510
(3,544,668)
(1,561)
(3,546,230)
111,530
462,185
573,715 $
— $
128,104
(5,473)
98,211
11,539
(4,739,406)
11,950
311,598
(650,000)
304,527
4,122
(60,443)
(349,910)
20,771
(1,511,150)
1,220,000
—
(284,298)
(100,000)
(52,641)
250,874
261,880
100,000
18,389
1,414,204
(224,874)
(7,262)
(232,135)
(329,081)
791,266
462,185
—
128,823
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
December 31, 2021
Commercial Business
Total
December 31, 2020
Commercial Business
Total
(In thousands)
December 31, 2021
Commercial Business
Total
December 31, 2020
Commercial Business
Total
ICC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule III — Supplemental Insurance Information
Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Deferred policy
acquisition costs
Future policy
benefits, losses,
claims and loss
expenses
Unearned
premiums
Other policy
and benefits
payable
Net premiums
earned
6,539 $
6,539 $
5,430 $
5,430 $
61,835 $
61,835 $
61,576 $
61,576 $
36,212 $
36,212 $
29,789 $
29,789 $
1,368 $
1,368 $
371 $
371 $
53,893
53,893
49,689
49,689
Net investment
income
Benefits, claims,
losses and
settlement
expenses
Amortization
of DAC
Other operating
expenses
Net premiums
written
3,414 $
3,414 $
3,498 $
3,498 $
34,700 $
34,700 $
32,562 $
32,562 $
11,054 $
11,054 $
10,034 $
10,034 $
10,729 $
10,729 $
9,344 $
9,344 $
60,210
60,210
49,047
49,047
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and report of independent registered public accounting firm.
~ 93 ~
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
Premiums
earned
2021
2020
ICC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule IV — Reinsurance
Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Gross
amount
Ceded to
other
companies
Assumed from
other
companies
Net
amount
$
$
64,653 $
59,587 $
10,854 $
10,080 $
95 $
182 $
53,893
49,689
Percentage of
amount
assumed to net
0.2%
0.4%
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and report of independent registered public accounting firm.
~ 94 ~
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
Beginning balance, allowance for uncollectibles
Write-offs, net of (recoveries)
Change in valuation allowance
Ending balance, allowance for uncollectibles
ICC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule V — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
2021
2020
$
$
150 $
68
(118)
100 $
100
546
(496)
150
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and report of independent registered public accounting firm.
~ 95 ~
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
2021
2020
(In thousands)
2021
2020
ICC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule VI — Supplemental Information
Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Deferred
policy
acquisition
costs
Reserve for
losses and
settlement
expenses
Discount if
any deducted
from reserves
Unearned
premium
Net earned
premiums
Net
investment
income
$
$
6,539 $
5,430 $
61,835 $
61,576 $
— $
— $
36,212 $
29,789 $
53,893 $
49,689 $
3,414
3,498
Losses and settlement
expenses incurred related to
Current year
Prior year
Amortization
of DAC
Paid losses
and
settlement
expenses
Net written
premiums
$
$
33,968 $
31,356 $
732 $
1,206 $
11,054 $
10,034 $
(35,943) $
(29,808) $
60,210
49,047
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements and report of independent registered public accounting firm.
~ 96 ~
Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that required information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required
timeframe as specified in the SEC’s rules and forms of the SEC. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures at December 31, 2021. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s
management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting as
required by Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Because we qualify as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, management's
report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the
year ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
~ 97 ~
Table of Contents
Items 10 to 14
PART III
Items 10 through 14 (inclusive) of this Part III are not included herein because the Company will file a definitive Proxy Statement with the SEC that
will include the information required by such Items, and such information is incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s Proxy Statement will be
filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 18, 2022, and the information
under the following captions is included in such incorporation by reference: “Proposal One: Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance and Board
Matters,” “Committees of the Board of Directors,” “Board Meetings and Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,”
“Executive Compensation Practices,” “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,” “Executive Management,” and “Executive Compensation.”
~ 98 ~
Table of Contents
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
(1-2) See Item 8 for Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules included in this report.
PART IV
(3) Exhibits. See Exhibit Index on page 101.
(b) Exhibits. See Exhibit Index on page 101.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules. See Financial Statement Schedules on pages 90-96.
~ 99 ~
Table of Contents
/s/SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ICC HOLDINGS, INC.
By:
/s/ Arron K. Sutherland
Arron K. Sutherland, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Arron K. Sutherland
Arron K. Sutherland
/s/ Joel K. Heriford
Joel K. Heriford
/s/ Gerald J. Pepping
Gerald J. Pepping
/s/ Mark J. Schwab
Mark J. Schwab
/s/ James R. Dingman
James R. Dingman
R. Kevin Clinton
/s/ John R. Klockau
John R. Klockau
/s/ Daniel H. Portes
Daniel H. Portes
/s/ Christine C. Schmitt
Christine C. Schmitt
/s/ Michael R. Smith
Michael R. Smith
Signature
Capacity
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Date
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
March 30, 2022
~ 100 ~
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
3.1
3.2
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.DEF
101.LAB
101.PRE
104
Description
Form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of ICC Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment
No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on December 23, 2016)
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of ICC Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on December 23, 2016)
ICC Holdings, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement
on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-38046) filed on April 13, 2017).
Employment Agreement among ICC Holdings, Inc., Illinois Casualty Company and Arron K. Sutherland (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on November 7,
2016)
Form of Change of Control Agreement among ICC Holdings, Inc., Illinois Casualty Company and an employee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on
November 7, 2016)
ICC Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on November 7, 2016)
Purchase Agreement among ICC Holdings, Inc., Illinois Casualty Company, and certain investors, including R. Kevin Clinton
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on
October 13, 2016)
Purchase Agreement among ICC Holdings, Inc., Illinois Casualty Company, and Rock Island Investors, LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on October 13, 2016)
Purchase Agreement among ICC Holdings, Inc., Illinois Casualty Company, and Tuscarora Wayne (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.6 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on October 13, 2016)
Illinois Casualty Company Profit Sharing Cash Bonus Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214081) filed on October 13, 2016)
Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (Chief Executive Officer) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No. 001-38406) filed on April 2, 2018)
Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No. 001-38406) filed on April 2, 2018)
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 31, 2018, by and between ICC Holdings, Inc. and certain entities and individuals identified on
Annex A thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13D/A (File No. 000-1701992) filed by R.
Kevin Clinton on September 12, 2018)
Subsidiaries of ICC Holdings, Inc.
Consent of Johnson Lambert LLP
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
~ 101 ~
Subsidiaries of
ICC Holdings, Inc.
Illinois Casualty Company
ICC Realty, LLC
Beverage Insurance Agency, Inc.
Estrella Innovative Solutions, Inc.
Southern Hospitality Education, LLC, dba Katkin
Exhibit 21.1
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Missouri
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on (Form S-8) (No. 333-219916) of ICC
Holdings, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2022 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedules included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Park Ridge, Illinois
March 30, 2022
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S 302 CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 31.1
I, Arron K. Sutherland, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ICC Holdings, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2022
/s/ Arron K. Sutherland
Arron K. Sutherland
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER’S 302 CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 31.2
I, Michael R. Smith, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ICC Holdings, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2022
/s/ Michael R. Smith
Michael R. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1
In connection with the Annual Report of ICC Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arron
K. Sutherland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
Date: March 30, 2022
/s/Arron K. Sutherland
Arron K. Sutherland
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2
In connection with the Annual Report of ICC Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Michael R. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.
2.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 30, 2022
/s/ Michael R. Smith
Michael R. Smith
Chief Financial Officer