Incitec Pivot Limited
Annual Report 2010

Plain-text annual report

I n c i t e c P i v o t L i m i t e d A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 1 0 Annual Report 2010 Incitec Pivot Limited ABN 42 004 080 264 70 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank Victoria 3006, Australia Postal Address Incitec Pivot Limited GPO Box 1322, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia Telephone: +61 3 8695 4400 Facsimile: +61 3 8695 4419 www.incitecpivot.com.au The paper used for this Annual Report 2010 is Harvest Recycled Silk. Harvest Recycled delivers Triple Green Environmental Performance: 60% Recycled Sugar Cane, ECF Bleaching and Sustainable Afforestation. 201020102010 Shareholder Information Annual General Meeting 2.00 pm Tuesday 21 December 2010 The Auditorium, Level 2, Melbourne Exhibition Centre, 2 Clarendon Street, Southbank Victoria, Australia Securities Exchange Listing Incitec Pivot Limited’s shares are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and are traded under the code IPL Share Registry Link Market Services Level 12, 680 George Street, Sydney New South Wales 2000, Australia Locked Bag A14, Sydney South New South Wales 1235 Telephone: 1300 303 780 (for callers within Australia) International: +61 2 8280 7765 General Facsimile: +61 2 9287 0303 Proxy Facsimile: +61 2 9287 0309 Email: registrars@linkmarketservices.com.au Website: www.linkmarketservices.com.au Auditor KPMG 147 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000, Australia Incitec Pivot Limited Registered address and head office: 70 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank Victoria 3006, Australia GPO Box 1322, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia Telephone: +61 3 8695 4400 Facsimile: +61 3 8695 4419 www.incitecpivot.com.au Explosives Fertilisers Trading Customers in the mining, quarry, construction, pipeline and geophysical exploration industries trust Dyno Nobel, a global leader in the commercial explosives industry, to deliver Groundbreaking Performance through Practical Innovation. Incitec Pivot Fertilisers is a key supplier of Australia’s soil health and nutrition needs, helping farmers maximise productivity to remain competitive in global markets. Southern Cross International is focused on sales to Australian distributors and export sales to Asia Pacific, the Indian sub-continent and Latin America. Contents Chairman’s Report ..................................................2 Managing Director’s Report ...................................4 Board of Directors ...................................................6 Executive Team ........................................................7 Directors’ Report ......................................................8 – Remuneration Report .....................................................13 – Corporate Governance Statement .......................................32 Financial Report ................................................... 41 Chairman’s Report The result shows that we have established a solid foundation built upon a sound strategy, privileged assets, operational excellence, financial discipline and the commitment to a high performance culture. The 2010 Full Year performance of Incitec Pivot, in a year of mixed market conditions, underscores the strength of the strategic direction, the quality of the people and the value of the assets. To come through the worst global financial dislocation in 80 years and confront some continuing challenges, confirms that Incitec Pivot is a company which can deliver through the toughest of economic environments. The result shows that we have established a solid foundation built upon a sound strategy, privileged assets, operational excellence, financial discipline and the commitment to a high performance culture. The Group’s strategy is to leverage the industrialisation cycle being driven by China and India, by positioning ourselves on the input side of the value chain for both hard and soft commodities. History demonstrates that, as an economy develops, there is increased demand for hard commodities such as copper. This, in turn, drives growth in real income which results in increased food demand. In both agriculture and mining industries, input side returns are typically higher and less volatile. Fertiliser and explosives are both key inputs to soft and hard commodities’ production. Manufacturing facilities, at the bottom of the cost curve, are essential to our strategy. Data shows that, in both explosives and fertilisers, vertically integrated manufacturing assets drive earnings. The 2010 results speak for themselves. Revenue was split about 50/50 between explosives and fertilisers. This highlights the value of the 2008 Dyno Nobel acquisition which increased our exposure to the global resources industry and provided further linkage to the Asian industrialisation cycle. It is somewhat gratifying that the future value in accessing the resources and agricultural industries is becoming a global business paradigm. Dyno Nobel Americas increased earnings despite flat market conditions and a 2% reduction in US dollar revenue. This is a tribute to the team who continue to deliver despite a struggling US economy. The US economy remains the world’s largest and, while in the long term growth may be small, even low digit growth will contribute substantial value for a business which is lean, nimble and customer responsive. Canada and Latin America both present opportunities. Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific achieved a 60% increase in earnings, based upon a customer-conscious team capitalising on the demand for Australian and Asian resource commodities. The Velocity efficiency program was a highlight producing incremental benefits of US$69.2 million. The four year target for the Velocity program is earnings before interest and tax of US$204 million, with US$140.2 million delivered to date. Incitec Pivot Fertilisers had a strong rebound, with earnings increasing by 20%. The Incitec Pivot Fertilisers team is a great example of how a well- managed committed team can achieve a positive outcome with volumes increasing to 1.7 million tonnes notwithstanding increased competition and variable market demand. Continued financial discipline is a hallmark of Incitec Pivot’s results and again the Group delivered exceptional results such as a reduction in our net debt, an improved gearing ratio and a prudent hedging policy to manage our exposure to the US dollar. We came out of the 2010 year with a strong balance sheet providing a platform for growth. A highlight was the US$800 million 144A Bond issue in December, 2009, which increased the diversity and tenor of our debt. The funds from the Bond issue were applied mainly to paying down debt. Through the Group’s capital management strategy of holding our debt in US dollars, we were able to take advantage of lower interest rates in the US compared with interest rates in Australia. As a result, we have delivered an average interest rate on our debt of well under five per cent, which is about half of that of some of our Australian peers. The foundation created by the success of our strategy has given the Board confidence to make growth decisions during the year. The major commitment was the re-start of the construction of the 330,000-tonne a year ammonium nitrate plant at Moranbah. The plant is based in the heart of Australia’s largest metallurgical coal region in the Bowen Basin in Queensland. When this $935 million project starts production in 2012, it will contribute a step change in earnings to Incitec Pivot. My fellow directors and I visited the project during the year and were pleased to see the progress on construction and to meet with senior representatives of Local Government. Also, during the year, there were a number of small but exciting growth opportunities which met our strategic criteria. These included the decision to commence the joint venture trading business, Quantum; the re-start of superphosphate manufacturing at Geelong; the opening of an initiation systems plant in Chile; and completion of the acquisition of the Nitromak business in Turkey, which previously had been a 50/50 joint venture. Quantum has added a new level of flexibility to Incitec Pivot, opening new fertiliser markets and leveraging extensive global contacts in selling and buying fertiliser and explosives. 2 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 The off-take agreement for two million tonnes a year of granular urea fertiliser from the Perdaman project in Western Australia, which was entered into subsequent to year end, could not have been achieved without the capability for Quantum to manage exports. In Chile, our plant was officially opened by the Provincial Governor to mark our return to Latin America where the former Dyno Nobel assets had been sold prior to Incitec Pivot’s acquisition of Dyno Nobel. Latin America, in general, and Chile, in particular, have vibrant and growing mining and construction industries. We will continue to be alert to growth opportunities which meet our criteria: the potential to increase our leverage to the industrialisation cycle, contribution to our manufacturing assets at the bottom of the cost curve and meeting our financial hurdles. Safety is the most critical component of operational excellence and receives Board focus through the Health, Safety Environment and Community Committee chaired by Allan McCallum. Commitment to a safe workplace is fundamental and everyone at Incitec Pivot was impacted by the tragic loss in May of a colleague in our subsidiary Canadian business, Castonguay. However, I believe that Zero Harm is achievable. The vast majority of our operations are injury free. During the year, the directors visited plants at St Helens (Oregon), Carthage (Missouri) and Graham (Kentucky), in the US, as well as meeting with a joint venture partner and visiting a customer’s gold mine. At Graham, our visit marked the site’s 1,266th day without a recordable injury. The US visit impressed us all with the high level of employee commitment to the Incitec Pivot Group’s Values, particularly Zero Harm, Think Customer and Deliver on our Promises. I’m pleased to say that this commitment to our Values, which are printed elsewhere in this Annual Report, is evident at every site I visit and is essential to our high performance culture. The site visits made by directors are but a small part of their contribution to Incitec Pivot. Incitec Pivot places a demanding work load on its directors and I want to express my gratitude for their continuing support to me and the erudition and experience they bring to discussions around the Board table. Each year we undertake a review of the Board’s performance against its Charter and also review the structure of the Board, seeking to ensure the Board comprises appropriate skills, experience and expertise relative to the Group’s strategy. After our 2009 review, which identified that the Board required additional strong financial skills and international experience, I am delighted that, following an extensive process, assisted by an international executive search firm, the Board appointed Paul Brasher as a non-executive director. Paul was an outstanding candidate, having been a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its predecessor firm, Price Waterhouse, for over 25 years including as Chairman of the firm’s Global Board for five years. He is a non-executive director of Perpetual Limited, a trustee of the Victorian Arts Centre Trust and Chairman of the Reach Foundation. Paul is already making a valuable contribution to the Board and is dedicating his time to participate in a comprehensive induction program on our businesses, strategies and operations and I welcome him to the Board. Paul will stand for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting and I recommend his election by shareholders. Our duty to our shareholders is to provide a strong and effective Board and to do so ensuring the most fitting of skills and experiences are brought to bear in discussion around the Board table. Following discussion with some of our shareholders throughout this financial year, the Board’s agenda has included discussions on cultural and gender diversity at both the Board and organisational level. To this end, the Remuneration and Appointments Committee is charged with assisting the Board in developing a diversity policy and we will report on this in 2011. In closing, I want to express the Board’s appreciation to everyone in the Incitec Pivot Group, from James and his Executive Team colleagues through to the people in offices throughout the world, to those on benches in the mine sites, in factories and in the farm fields. It is each of them who has delivered this result and who will continue to deliver into the future. I’m confident in our strategic pathway and in the steps we are taking. John C Watson, AM Chairman Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 3 Managing Director’s Report In my first full year as Managing Director & CEO, I find myself proud to lead a team which has delivered such a strong result in mixed market conditions including the challenges of the US economy and volatile fertiliser demand. I am firmly convinced that it is the quality of our people which drives the Group’s performance. For this reason, I set my focus on People, including Zero Harm, as one of my three key priorities, together with Customers and Efficiency. The 2010 result clearly demonstrates the value of this approach. Our Net Profit After Tax (NPAT), excluding Individually Material Items, was $442.8 million, an increase of $95 million on the financial result for 2009. Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) improved to $648.3 million, compared with $575.7 million in 2009. There were equal contributions from explosives and fertilisers. Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific achieved a 60% increase, or $66.2 million, in EBIT results. Dyno Nobel Americas delivered an increased EBIT of US$147.9 million, compared with US$145.4 million in 2009. This was a good performance in a flat market and despite a 2% reduction in US dollar revenue. Incitec Pivot Fertilisers also produced a good result achieving EBIT of $112.4 million, a 20% increase on 2009. This result was achieved notwithstanding testing market conditions in the agri- business sector in Australia where a number of other companies struggled in 2010. Southern Cross International EBIT increased by 21.4% to $222.6 million and sales volumes of manufactured Ammonium Phosphates were up 78,000 tonnes on 2009. Manufacturing excellence is both a strategic principle and a cultural commitment through continued support for the risk and reliability approach we adopt in managing our manufacturing assets. Major maintenance programs were undertaken at the Phosphate Hill fertiliser plant, in Queensland, the biggest plant in our manufacturing portfolio, and at Cheyenne, in Wyoming, our biggest plant in the United States. In 2011, we plan a major maintenance program at our Gibson Island fertiliser plant in Queensland. In addition, a highlight for me has been our Initiating Systems business which has demonstrated how sustainable benefits can be delivered, year on year, by applying “lean principles” which have been in place in that business for a number of years. Results such as these come because of our people – with focused leadership and a committed team working to the right strategy and addressing the business fundamentals of safe workplaces, reliable plants, quality products, customer relationships and efficient processes. My firm belief is that our people give Incitec Pivot a sustainable advantage that cannot be replicated elsewhere and our focus this year has been to work on creating strong leadership and organisational climate. Research over many years has shown outstanding companies come from having a fully engaged workforce, with clear leadership creating a positive climate thereby resulting in employees giving their discretionary effort. Aligned with this approach, we surveyed our employees to better understand the organisational climate in the Group, which has undergone substantial change since 2003. One of our values is “Challenge and Improve the Status Quo” and following the survey we challenged our leadership in a program called “Raising the bar” , establishing comprehensive leadership development programs. By the time the current program is completed next year, over 800 leaders in the Group will have participated in the program. Success will be measured through the performance of the Group and the ability of our team to produce improved results, year on year, in any market conditions. The Group’s reward and recognition program will, for the first time, reference “how” financial and operational results are delivered as well as the “what”, the results themselves. The “how” is built around the Incitec Pivot Group’s Values which are grouped under a banner of “Own.Breakout Deliver.” Our seven Values, which were created by employees themselves, are the key driver of our Group culture and are critical to linking the organisation globally. The Values also link with cultural and gender diversity which is important in our approach to People and leadership. For example, Indigenous employment programs are in development as well as programs to attract more women into our operations and to offer leadership development opportunities. In my role as Managing Director & CEO, I enjoy visiting our sites and offices and meeting our people and customers. The employee meetings allow me to reinforce our strategic priorities, highlight the Group Values and to recognise good performance. My first message to employees is always on Zero Harm; it is our number one priority. I’m pleased to say that more than 80% of our sites, offices and operations are injury free which shows me Zero Harm is possible. However, our performance in Zero Harm 4 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 was tragically overshadowed by the workplace death of a colleague at our Canadian subsidiary, Castonguay. This tragedy reminds us that we all must remain diligent in ensuring our own safety and that of our work colleagues. Immediately following this incident we held “Safety Stand Downs” at all of our Group sites, reaffirming our focus on achieving Zero Harm. In relation to customers, we achieved a number of substantial milestones during the year. Our customers in Queensland’s Bowen Basin strongly supported our decision to re-start the ammonium nitrate project at Moranbah, with virtually all of the production sold when the plant comes on stream in 2012. When I visited the site in October and met with customers, the project was some 55% complete and on track to meet production deadlines. Another major customer accomplishment was Dyno Nobel Americas’ re-signing of the explosives supply contract with Peabody Coal, our single biggest customer. I was pleased to meet many customers at the official opening of our initiation systems plant in Chile in June. My site visits have also included customer meetings in Western Australia, the United States, in Turkey and at the re-opening of our superphosphate plant at Geelong. Our fertiliser customers will also benefit from our entry into a 20 year off-take commitment for two million tonnes a year of urea from the proposed Perdaman project in Western Australia, which is expected to come on line in 2014. Efficiency outcomes are very much the result of our people throughout the Group. The financial fundamentals have again been delivered, highlighted by operating cash flows improving by $191.5 million to $528.9 million inflow, net debt reducing by $366.3 million to $1.1 billion, the gearing ratio improving to 1.39 times and interest cover improving to 12.2 times. The Velocity efficiency program continues to produce results with incremental benefits in 2010 of US$69.2 million. Velocity is on track to deliver on the four year target of US$204 million. During the year, we made progress on our Sustainability agenda for the next three years. We define Sustainability as “the creation of long term economic value while caring for our people, our communities and our environment”. The Sustainability agenda, developed using a comprehensive process including employee interviews and workshops plus benchmarking against our peers, comprises: Use less: more efficient use of non-renewable resources; Get close: community engagement and Be responsible: product lifecycle. Energy and water efficiency has been a key area of action over many years and we continued to make progress this year. Regarding energy, we participate in the Australian Energy Efficiency Opportunity program and we have been noted by the Australian Government as an example of industry “best practice”. One project alone has resulted in saving 213,000 gigajoules. Finally, I want to thank my fellow directors, my colleagues on the Executive Team and employees throughout the Group. I am continually delighted and impressed by the focus, quality and commitment of our people. I have absolute confidence that with leadership and support, our people will continue to deliver strong results, such as in 2010, into the future. James Fazzino Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer “ Own.Breakout.Deliver embodies the IPL Group’s Values which are at our core. They reflect the fairness and trust in which we believe and are the guiding principles Incitec Pivot draws on in its day-to-day decision making.” James Fazzino Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer ‘Own’ captures the values: Zero Harm for Everyone, Everywhere Value People – Respect, Recognise and Reward Treat the Business as Our Own Care for the Community and Our Environment Think Customer. Everyone. Everyday ‘Breakout’ identifies the opportunity to: Challenge and Improve the Status Quo ‘Deliver’ captures the philosophy that we will: Deliver on Our Promises Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 5 Board of Directors John Watson AM MAICD Non-executive Chairman John was appointed as a director on 15 December 1997 and was appointed Chairman in January 1998. John is the Chairman of Tasman Farms Limited and Governor of Van Diemen’s Land Company, a director of Tassal Group Limited, Councillor of the Royal Agricultural Society of Victoria and a member of the Rabobank Food and Agribusiness Advisory Board for Australia and New Zealand. He is also a past Deputy President of the National Farmers’ Federation, a former Chairman of PrimeSafe and a former non-executive director of Rural Press Limited. He was formerly Chairman of the Export Wheat Commission, which was replaced by a new authority, Wheat Exports Australia, on 1 July 2008. In 2004, he was awarded a Membership in the Order of Australia for services to the agricultural and food production sectors. Allan McCallum Dip. Ag Science, FAICD Non-executive director Chairman of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee Allan was appointed as a director on 15 December 1997. Allan is Chairman of Tassal Group Limited and CRF Group Limited, and is a director of Medical Developments International Limited. He is a former director of Graincorp Limited and a former Chairman of Vicgrain Limited. Anthony Larkin FCPA, FAICD Non-executive director Chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee Tony was appointed as a director on 1 June 2003. He is a non-executive director of Oakton Limited. Tony was previously a non-executive director of OZ Minerals Limited, Corporate Express Australia Limited and Eyecare Partners Limited, Executive Director Finance of Orica Limited, Chairman of Incitec Limited and Chairman of Ausmelt Limited. During his career with BHP Limited, which spanned 38 years, he held the position of Group Treasurer and, prior to that, he held senior finance positions in its steel and minerals businesses and various senior corporate roles. From 1993 to 1997, he was seconded to Foster’s Group Limited as Senior Vice President Finance and Investor Relations. Until early 2006, he was a Commissioner of the Victorian Essential Services Commission. John Marlay BSc, FAICD Non-executive director Chairman of Remuneration and Appointments Committee John was appointed to the Board on 20 December 2006. John is a non- executive director of Boral Limited as well as independent Chairman of Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd, a joint venture between Rio Tinto, Alcan, CSR/AMP and Hydro Aluminum companies. John is a former Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Alumina Limited, a former director of Alcoa of Australia Limited, Alcoa World Alumina LLC and the Business Council of Australia, the former Deputy Chairman of Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals Strategic Council, and the former Chairman of the Australian Aluminium Council. In addition, he previously held executive positions with Esso Australia Limited, James Hardie Industries Limited, Pioneer International Group Holdings and Hanson plc. Graham Smorgon B.Juris LLB Non-executive director Graham was appointed to the Board on 19 December 2008. Graham is a non- executive director of OneSteel Limited, Chairman of Smorgon Consolidated Investments, the GBM Group and the Print Mint Group, a trustee of the Victorian Arts Centre Trust and Chairman of the Victorian Arts Centre Foundation. His former roles include Chairman of Smorgon Steel Group Limited, President of the Carlton Football Club, Director of Fed Square Pty Ltd, 6 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Left: John Watson, Allan McCallum, Anthony Larkin, John Marlay Below: Graham Smorgon, Paul Brasher, James Fazzino Opposite above: James Fazzino, Frank Micallef, Kerry Gleeson, Bernard Walsh, Alan Grace Opposite below: James Whiteside, Gary Brinkworth, Stephen Dawson, Brian Wallace, Jamie Rintel, Simon Atkinson Deputy Chairman of Melbourne Health, Director of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and partner of law firm Barker Harty & Co, where he practised as a commercial lawyer for 10 years. Paul Brasher BEc(Hons), FCA Paul was appointed to the Board by the directors on 29 September 2010. Paul is a non-executive director of Perpetual Limited, a trustee of the Victorian Arts Centre Trust and Chairman of the Reach Foundation. From 1982 to 2009, Paul was a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers (and its predecessor firm, Price Waterhouse), one of the world’s major chartered accounting and professional services firms, including five years as the Chairman of the Global Board of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Paul is a former Chairman of the National Gallery of Victoria’s Business Council, a former member of the Committee for Melbourne, a former board member of Asialink and a former trustee of the Committee for Economic Development of Australia. James Fazzino BEc(Hons), FCPA Managing Director & CEO James was appointed Managing Director & CEO on 29 July 2009. James was first appointed as a director on 18 July 2005, following his appointment as Chief Financial Officer in May 2003. Before joining Incitec Pivot, he had many years experience with Orica Limited in several business financial roles, including Investor Relations Manager, Chief Financial Officer for the Orica Chemicals group and Project Leader of Orica’s group restructure in 2001. Executive Team James Fazzino BEc(Hons), FCPA Managing Director & CEO Frank Micallef BBus, MAcc, FCPA, FFTA Chief Financial Officer Frank was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on 23 October 2009. Frank joined IPL in May 2008 as General Manager Treasury and Chief Financial Officer Trading. Prior to joining IPL, Frank had significant experience in the explosives and mining industries as Global Treasurer and Investor Relations Manager at Orica and General Manager Accounting at North Limited. Kerry Gleeson LLB(Hons) General Counsel & Company Secretary Kerry qualified as a lawyer in 1991, in England & Wales, and subsequently in Victoria, Australia in 2001. Kerry was appointed as General Counsel and Company Secretary in February 2004. Prior to joining the Company, Kerry had extensive private practice experience in IPOs, international mergers and acquisitions, equity markets, financing and restructuring, while practising in Australia, with Blake Dawson, and prior to that, as a partner of an English law firm. In 2009, Kerry received the ALB Australasian Law Award for In-House Lawyer of the Year. Bernard Walsh BE(Mech), MIEAust CPEng President, Global Manufacturing Bernard has extensive manufacturing experience in petrochemicals, chemicals and mining services. Bernard joined IPL from Orica Limited where he held a variety of roles from 1987, including General Manager of Initiation Explosives Systems (IES) until 2003. IES was a joint venture between Orica Limited and Ensign Bickford Industries Inc. and manufactured a full range of initiating systems at its Helidon, Queensland, and Deer Park, Melbourne, sites. Alan Grace BScChemEng, MIChemE General Manager, Major Projects - Moranbah Project Director Alan joined IPL on the Company’s merger with Incitec Fertilizers Limited, having commenced with Incitec Limited in 2000. Alan has extensive experience in the construction and operation of chemical and petrochemical manufacturing facilities. Alan previously held the role of General Manager Chemicals, where he was responsible for managing the chemicals business unit. As General Manager, Major Projects, Alan is the Project Director for the Moranbah Project. James Whiteside BAgricSc, GradDipBusAdmin General Manager, Supply Chain & Trading James joined IPL (then known as Pivot Limited) in 1992, following extensive experience in agricultural companies and consulting. Since joining IPL, James has held a number of senior management roles, including Group Procurement Manager. As General Manager Supply Chain & Trading, James is responsible for Southern Cross International and its international and domestic trading business, and is Chief Executive Officer of the Quantum joint venture. Gary Brinkworth BEc General Manager, Incitec Pivot Fertilisers & Human Resources Gary joined IPL in November 2008. He has extensive local and international experience across wholesale fuel distribution, retail and financial services industries. Gary has held several senior leadership positions with BP Oil in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States and brings a strong customer focus to the business. Immediately prior to joining IPL, Gary held the position of General Manager – Group Business Development with Coles Group. Stephen Dawson BSc (Hons) Mining Engineering, MBA President, Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Stephen joined the Company upon its acquisition of Dyno Nobel in 2008. Stephen is responsible for leading the Dyno Nobel industrial explosives business in the Asia-Pacific region, including Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. He commenced his career with British Coal and subsequently worked with mining companies Amcoal Collieries Limited and Randcoal in South Africa. Stephen has also worked with AECI Explosives Limited (now AEL) in a variety of sales and operational roles. Brian Wallace MSc, MBA President, Dyno Nobel Americas Brian joined the Company in 2008 and is responsible for Dyno Nobel’s North American business. He has extensive experience in the industrial explosives business, having worked in the industry for over 25 years starting with AECI Explosives Limited (now AEL) in Johannesburg and, prior to joining Incitec Pivot, held positions with Austin Powder Company in the United States and Orica. Jamie Rintel BA President, Strategy & Business Development Jamie joined IPL in February 2005, following extensive experience in consulting across a range of industries both in Australia and overseas. Within IPL, Jamie has held a number of roles including, Marketing Manager for Incitec Pivot Fertilisers. Jamie was appointed to his current role as President, Strategy & Business Development in June 2008. Simon Atkinson BBus, CA President, New Markets Simon joined the Company on its merger with Incitec Fertilizers Limited in 2003, having commenced with Incitec Limited in 2001 and Orica Limited in 1999. He has extensive finance experience, having been the Company’s Commercial Finance Manager for the Australian fertilisers business. Simon was previously the Company’s Investor Relations Manager and more recently, the Global CFO for the Group’s explosives business. Simon was appointed to his current role as President of New Markets in May 2010 and has responsibility for new markets, including Turkey and Chile. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 7 Directors’ Report The directors of Incitec Pivot Limited present the directors’ report, together with the financial report, of the Company and its controlled entities (the Group) for the year ended 30 September 2010 and the related auditor’s report. Directors The directors of the Company during the financial year and up to the date of this report are: Name, qualifications and special responsibilities Experience J C Watson AM, MAICD Independent non-executive director and Chairman Member of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee Member of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee John was appointed as a director on 15 December 1997 and was appointed Chairman in January 1998. John is the Chairman of Tasman Farms Limited and Governor of Van Diemen’s Land Company, a director of Tassal Group Limited, Councillor of the Royal Agricultural Society of Victoria and a member of the Rabobank Food and Agribusiness Advisory Board for Australia and New Zealand. He is also a past Deputy President of the National Farmers’ Federation, a former Chairman of PrimeSafe and a former non-executive director of Rural Press Limited. He was formerly Chairman of the Export Wheat Commission, which was replaced by a new authority, Wheat Exports Australia, on 1 July 2008. In 2004, he was awarded a Membership in the Order of Australia for services to the agricultural and food production sectors. A C Larkin FCPA, FAICD Independent non-executive director Chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee Member of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee Tony was appointed as a director on 1 June 2003. He is a non-executive director of Oakton Limited. Tony was previously a non-executive director of OZ Minerals Limited, Corporate Express Australia Limited and Eyecare Partners Limited, Executive Director Finance of Orica Limited, Chairman of Incitec Limited and Chairman of Ausmelt Limited. During his career with BHP Limited, which spanned 38 years, he held the position of Group Treasurer and, prior to that, he held senior finance positions in its steel and minerals businesses and various senior corporate roles. From 1993 to 1997, he was seconded to Foster’s Group Limited as Senior Vice President Finance and Investor Relations. Until early 2006, he was a Commissioner of the Victorian Essential Services Commission. A D McCallum Dip. Ag Science, FAICD Independent non-executive director Chairman of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee Member of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee J Marlay BSc, FAICD Independent non-executive director Chairman of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee Member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee Allan was appointed as a director on 15 December 1997. Allan is Chairman of Tassal Group Limited and CRF Group Limited, and is a director of Medical Developments International Limited. He is a former director of Graincorp Limited and a former Chairman of Vicgrain Limited. John was appointed to the Board on 20 December 2006. John is a non-executive director of Boral Limited as well as independent Chairman of Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd, a joint venture between Rio Tinto, Alcan, CSR/AMP and Hydro Aluminum companies. John is a former Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Alumina Limited, a former director of Alcoa of Australia Limited, Alcoa World Alumina LLC and the Business Council of Australia, the former Deputy Chairman of Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals Strategic Council, and the former Chairman of the Australian Aluminium Council. In addition, he previously held executive positions with Esso Australia Limited, James Hardie Industries Limited, Pioneer International Group Holdings and Hanson plc. 8 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Name, qualifications and special responsibilities Experience G Smorgon B.Juris LLB Independent non-executive director Member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee Graham was appointed to the Board on 19 December 2008. Graham is a non-executive director of OneSteel Limited, Chairman of Smorgon Consolidated Investments, the GBM Group and the Print Mint Group, a trustee of the Victorian Arts Centre Trust and Chairman of the Victorian Arts Centre Foundation. His former roles include Chairman of Smorgon Steel Group Limited, President of the Carlton Football Club, director of Fed Square Pty Ltd, Deputy Chairman of Melbourne Health, director of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and partner of law firm Barker Harty & Co, where he practised as a commercial lawyer for 10 years. P V Brasher BEc(Hons), FCA Independent non-executive director Paul was appointed to the Board by the directors on 29 September 2010. Paul is a non-executive director of Perpetual Limited, a trustee of the Victorian Arts Centre Trust and Chairman of the Reach Foundation. From 1982 to 2009, Paul was a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers (and its predecessor firm, Price Waterhouse), one of the world’s major chartered accounting and professional services firms, including five years as the Chairman of the Global Board of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Paul is a former Chairman of the National Gallery of Victoria’s Business Council, a former member of the Committee for Melbourne, a former board member of Asialink and a former trustee of the Committee for Economic Development of Australia. J E Fazzino BEc(Hons), FCPA Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer Member of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee James was appointed as Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer on 29 July 2009. James was first appointed as a director on 18 July 2005, following his appointment as Chief Financial Officer in May 2003. Before joining Incitec Pivot, James had many years of experience with Orica Limited in several business financial roles, including Investor Relations Manager, Chief Financial Officer for the Orica Chemicals group and Project Leader of Orica’s group restructure in 2001. Company Secretary Mrs Kerry Gleeson holds the office of Company Secretary. Kerry is a practising solicitor, having been admitted to practice in England and Wales in 1991 and in Victoria in 2001. Kerry was appointed as Company Secretary on 16 February 2004, having previously practised with Blake Dawson in Melbourne and, prior to that, Kerry was a partner of an English law firm. Directors’ interests in share capital The relevant interest of each director in the share capital of the Company, as notified by the directors to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in accordance with section 205G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), as at the date of this report is as follows: Director J C Watson A C Larkin A D McCallum(1) J Marlay(1) G Smorgon P V Brasher J E Fazzino(1) (2) Fully paid ordinary shares Incitec Pivot Limited 100,000 5,000 216,501 37,926 0 0 1,845,420 (1) Held both directly and indirectly. (2) This interest includes shares held pursuant to Incitec Pivot’s long term incentive plans. Further details of the long term incentive plans are set out in the remuneration report and in Note 36 to the financial statements, Share based payments. Further details of directors’ interests in share capital are set out in Note 35 to the financial statements, Key Management Personnel disclosures. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 9 Directors’ Report Directors’ meetings The number of directors’ meetings held (including meetings of committees of directors) and the number of meetings attended by each of the directors of the Company during the financial year are listed below: Director Current J C Watson(3) A C Larkin A D McCallum J Marlay(4) G Smorgon J E Fazzino P V Brasher(5) Board Audit and Risk Management Remuneration and Appointments Health, Safety, Environment and Community Held(1) Attended(2) Held(1) Attended(2) Held(1) Attended(2) Held(1) Attended(2) 14 14 14 14 14 14 1 14 13 14 14 14 14 1 - 4 - 4 4 - - - 4 - 4 4 - - 6 - 6 6 - - - 6 - 6 6 - - - 4 4 4 - - 4 - 4 4 4 - - 4 - (1) This column shows the number of meetings held during the period that the director was a member of the Board or Committee. (2) This column shows the number of meetings attended during the period that the director was a member of the Board or Committee. (3) Mr John Watson retired as the Chairman of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee on 26 February 2010. However, he continued as a member of the Committee. (4) Mr John Marlay was appointed by the Board as Chairman of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee on 26 February 2010. (5) Mr Paul Brasher was appointed to the Board by the directors on 29 September 2010. Principal activities The principal activities of the Group during the course of the financial year were the manufacture, trading and distribution of fertilisers, industrial explosives and chemicals, and the provision of related services. No significant changes have occurred in the nature of these activities during the financial year. Review and results of operations Group Financial Highlights • Net Profit After Tax excluding minority interests (including individually material items(1)) for the year ended 30 September 2010 was $410.5m, up $631.9m compared to a Net Loss After Tax excluding minority interests (including individually material items) in the year ended 30 September 2009 of $221.4m. • Net Profit After Tax excluding minority interests (excluding individually material items) for the year ended 30 September 2010 was up 27.3% or $95.0m to $442.8m (2009: $347.8m). The result reflects strong performance in all four business segments despite mixed market conditions and includes the delivery of Velocity program benefits. • Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) (excluding individually material items) was up 12.6% or $72.6m to $648.3m (2009: $575.7m) with the mix of earnings being approximately 50% Explosives and 50% Fertilisers. • Earnings Per Share (excluding individually material items) were up 20.8% to 27.3 cents (2009: 22.6 cents). • Decrease in Financial Expenses of $67.8m to $58.3m (2009: $126.1m), as a result of lower Net Debt levels and a lower interest rate achieved in 2010. Business Segment Financial Highlights • Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific (DNAP) EBIT was up 60.3% to $176.0m (2009: $109.8m) as a result of lower losses incurred in servicing Moranbah foundation customers coupled with an increase in the release of the Moranbah unfavourable contract liability. Underlying business performance was strong, benefitting from lower nitrogen prices and better sourcing of product. • Southern Cross International (SCI) EBIT was up 21.4% to $222.6m (2009: $183.3m) due to higher sales of manufactured Di-Ammonium Phosphate at a slightly lower Australian dollar price. • Incitec Pivot Fertilisers (IPF) EBIT was up 19.6% to $112.4m (2009: $94.0m) reflecting higher volumes sold in the Australian market in 2010. • Dyno Nobel Americas (DNA) delivered $163.2m EBIT, which represented a decrease of $34.5m from 2009 EBIT of $197.7m. However, when measured in its base currency (US dollar), DNA EBIT was up slightly with the benefits of the Velocity program offsetting difficult market conditions. 1. Individually material items are revenues or expenses that are outside the normal operations of the business and are non-recurring in nature. 10 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 External Sales Revenue • Revenue decreased by $487.2m, or 14.3%, to $2,931.7m (2009: $3,418.9m) in the year ended 30 September 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of the higher Australian dollar on US dollar earnings derived in DNA and by IPF and SCI. Of the total revenue of $2,931.7m in the year ended 30 September 2010, $1,387.6m, or 47.3%, was derived from the fertiliser business and $1,544.1m, or 52.7%, was derived from the explosives business. • The decrease in revenue from the fertiliser business of $203.7m, or 12.8%, to $1,387.6m (2009: $1,591.3m) in the year ended 30 September 2010 was due to a decrease in revenue in IPF of $64.3m to $885.9m (2009: $950.2m) and a decrease in revenue in SCI of $130.4m to $647.1m (2009: $777.5m) and an increase in the elimination of intercompany sales of $9.0m from an elimination of $136.4m in 2009 to an elimination of $145.4m in 2010. The decrease in IPF revenues was impacted by lower average fertiliser prices, in particular Urea and Single Superphosphate, which was partially offset by a 21% increase in sales volumes. The decrease in SCI revenues was primarily due to lower average realised fertiliser prices. While US dollar prices for Di-Ammonium Phosphate increased from the prior year this was more than offset by the appreciation of the Australian dollar. • The explosives business contributed $1,544.1m of revenue (2009: $1,827.6m) in the year ended 30 September 2010, representing a decline of 15.5% or $283.5m due to a decrease in revenue in DNA of $295.9m to $1,092.5m (2009: $1,388.4m) and a decrease in revenue in DNAP of $5.9m to $499.8m (2009: $505.7m) offset by a decrease in the elimination of intercompany sales of $18.3m from an elimination of $66.5m in 2009 to an elimination of $48.2m in 2010. The decrease in DNA revenues reflected the impact of the rising Australian dollar on US dollar revenues derived by this business, as US dollar revenues were relatively flat for the year. The decrease in DNAP revenues was a result of decreased nitrogen selling prices offset by a slight increase in volumes. Returns to Shareholders • A final dividend of 6 cents per share (cps) unfranked is to be paid on 17 December 2010. • This brings the total 2010 dividend to 7.8 cps, 0% franked (2009: 4.4cps 48% franked). • Total shareholder returns for 2010 were positive 30% (2009: negative 43%) assuming shares were held for the full year. Balance Sheet • Net debt decreased by $366.3m to $1,097.1m at 30 September 2010 (2009: $1,463.4m) as a result of improved operating cash flows and the benefit of carrying debt in US dollars while the Australian dollar appreciated during 2010. • The Net Debt/EBITDA(2) ratio is 1.39 at 30 September 2010 (2009: 1.97). Dividends Dividends paid since the last annual report were: Type Paid during the year 2009 final dividend 2010 interim dividend Paid after end of year 2010 final dividend Dealt with in the financial report as: Dividends Subsequent event Cents per share Total amount $000 Franked / Unfranked Date of payment 2.3 1.8 6 Note 27 27 37,100 29,300 97,724 $000 66,400 97,724 Unfranked Unfranked 18 December 2009 6 July 2010 Unfranked 17 December 2010 2. Net Debt/EBITDA equals interest bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents / Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation, excluding individually material items. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 11 Directors’ Report Changes in the state of affairs There have been no significant changes to the Group’s state of affairs during the year. Events subsequent to balance date Since the end of the financial year, in November 2010, the directors determined to pay a final dividend for the Company of 6 cents per share on 17 December 2010. The dividend is unfranked (Refer Note 27 to the financial statements). In October 2010, the Company entered into a 20 year off-take commitment with Perdaman Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited for the output of approximately two million tonnes per annum of granular Urea fertiliser from the proposed project at Collie, Western Australia. Under the agreement, the Company is the off-taker from the proposed project, which is planned to begin production in 2014. The product supplied to the Company under the agreement would be available for sale in Oceania, Pakistan, Asia and the Americas. Other than the matters reported on above, the directors have not become aware of any other significant matter or circumstance that has arisen since 30 September 2010 that has affected or may affect the operations of the Group, the result of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in subsequent years, which has not been covered in this report. Likely developments Further information on likely developments in the operations of the Group and the expected results of the operations has not been included in this report because the directors believe it would be likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the Group. Environmental regulations Manufacturing licences and consents are in place at each Group site, determined in consultation with local environmental regulatory authorities. The measurement of compliance with conditions of licences and consents involves numerous tests which are conducted regularly. The individual sites record their compliance and report that there is continued high compliance. When breaches occur, they are reported to the authorities as required and actions taken to prevent recurrences. Indemnification and insurance of officers The Company’s Constitution provides that, to the extent permitted by law, the Company must indemnify any person who is, or has been, a director or secretary of the Company against any liability incurred by that person including any liability incurred as an officer of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company and legal costs incurred by that person in defending an action. The Constitution further provides that the Company may enter into an agreement with any current or former director or secretary or a person who is, or has been, an officer of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company to indemnify the person against such liabilities. The Company has entered into Deeds of Access, Indemnity and Insurance with each of its officers. Pursuant to those deeds, the Company has paid a premium in respect of a contract insuring officers of the Company and officers of its controlled entities against liability for costs and expenses incurred by them in defending civil or criminal proceedings involving them as such officers, with some exceptions. The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the nature of the liability insured against and the amount of the premium paid. Auditor KPMG continues in office in accordance with section 327B(2) of the Corporations Act 2001(Cth). Non-audit services KPMG has provided non-audit services to the amount of $80,100 during the year ended 30 September 2010 (Refer Note 7 to the financial statements). Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration The lead auditor has provided a written declaration that no professional engagement for the Group has been carried out during the year that would impair KPMG’s independence as auditor. The lead auditor’s independence declaration is set out on page 40 of this Annual Report. Rounding The Company is of a kind referred to in ASIC Class Order 98/100 dated 10 July 1998 and, in accordance with that Class Order, the amounts shown in this report and in the financial statements have been rounded off, except where otherwise stated, to the nearest one hundred thousand dollars. 12 12 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report The directors of Incitec Pivot Limited (the Company or Incitec Pivot) present the Remuneration Report prepared in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the Company and its controlled entities (collectively referred to in this report as the “Group”) for the year ended 30 September 2010. This Remuneration Report is audited. The structure of this Remuneration Report is as follows: Section This Remuneration Report forms part of the Directors’ Report. A. Remuneration Overview Details of the Group’s remuneration strategy and arrangements for the 2009/10 financial year are set out in this Remuneration Report. This Remuneration Report is prepared in respect of the Key Management Personnel, being those persons who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group. The Board has determined that the Key Management Personnel are the non-executive directors of the Company (refer to table B.1), certain former executives that resigned during the reporting period (refer to table C.3) and the people referred to in the table below, which includes the five most highly remunerated Group executives. When used in this Remuneration Report, the term “Executives” means the people listed in the following table (and the former executives that resigned during the reporting period, as the context requires). Name Position Mr James Fazzino Managing Director & CEO Mr Frank Micallef Chief Financial Officer Mrs Kerry Gleeson General Counsel & Company Secretary Mr Bernard Walsh President, Global Manufacturing Mr Alan Grace General Manager, Major Projects – Moranbah Project Director Mr James Whiteside General Manager, Supply Chain & Trading Mr Gary Brinkworth General Manager, Incitec Pivot Fertilisers & Human Resources Mr Stephen Dawson President, Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific B. Non-Executive Director Remuneration C. Executive Remuneration Executive remuneration policy and practice Key features of the components of Executive remuneration − Fixed annual remuneration − At risk remuneration – Short Term Incentive (STI) Plan − At risk remuneration – Long Term Incentive (LTI) Plans Analysis of relationship between the Group’s performance, shareholder wealth and remuneration Executives’ remuneration arrangements − Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer − Executive Team Mr Brian Wallace President, Dyno Nobel Americas Details of Executive remuneration Mr Jamie Rintel President, Strategy & Business Development Mr Simon Atkinson President, New Markets − Executive remuneration − Short term incentive − Long term incentives Page 14 16 17 17 17 18 19 22 24 24 25 26 26 28 29 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 13 13 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report A. Remuneration Overview Incitec Pivot aims to generate competitive returns for its shareholders through its strategy as a leading global chemicals Group, manufacturing and distributing industrial explosives, fertilisers and related products and services. Incitec Pivot recognises that to achieve this the Group needs outstanding people who are capable, committed and motivated. The philosophy of Incitec Pivot’s remuneration strategy is that it should support the objectives of the business and enable the Group to attract, retain and reward Executives of the necessary skill and calibre. Accordingly, the key principles of Incitec Pivot’s remuneration strategy are as follows: • to provide market competitive remuneration to attract, retain and reward Executives; • for the majority of Executive remuneration to be “at risk” and linked to performance and the creation of sustained shareholder value; • to apply demanding financial and non-financial performance objectives for the short and long term incentive plans; and • for the long term incentive, to result in share ownership on the achievement of demanding objectives, linking remuneration to Company performance as experienced by shareholders. Remuneration in Practice in 2009/10 Financial Year Key Highlights Commentary Fixed annual remuneration and non-executive director fees Freeze Having regard to the financial performance of the Group and the global financial environment, a freeze on fixed annual remuneration for Executives and on fees for non-executive directors was implemented in 2009/10. 2009/10 Short Term Incentive Set Challenging Targets Driving Creation of Shareholder Value The Board set challenging performance conditions for the 2009/10 Short Term Incentive (STI) Plan including a condition on achieving Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth (before individually material items) compared to the prior year and, where relevant for a particular Executive, the Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) of a business segment in the Group. With EPS having grown 20.8% for the year ended 30 September 2010, Executives received payments under the STI Plan. Details of the amounts awarded are set out in table C.4. 2007/10 Long Term Incentive No Awards Made on Maturity of Plan The 2007/10 Long Term Incentive (LTI) Plan matured on 30 September 2010. The performance conditions applying under this Plan were established in 2007 and for awards (in the form of loan forgiveness) to be made under the Plan required the Company’s total shareholder returns (TSR), measured over the three year period to 30 September 2010, to be greater than 10% per annum compounded over the three year period. The Company’s TSR is 2.64% per annum compounded over the three years to 30 September 2010 and, accordingly, no awards (in the form of loan forgiveness) were made to Executives (or any participant) under the 2007/10 LTI Plan. 14 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Remuneration for the 2010/11 Financial Year Over the years, the Board has been consistent in the application of the remuneration strategy, maintaining stability in its practices while annually reviewing executive remuneration, having regard to the need to offer competitive remuneration packages and to respond to shareholder sentiment. Accordingly, in readiness for the 2010/11 financial year, the Board commenced a detailed review of the remuneration policy and the structure of the remuneration packages offered to the Executives. The Remuneration and Appointments Committee engaged Godfrey Remuneration Group, an appropriately qualified and independent remuneration consultant, to assist in the review. The outcome of the review is described in the table below. Key Features Commentary Retention of remuneration structure Broad Structure of Executive Remuneration to be Retained Following the review, the Board determined to retain the structure of fixed and “at risk” (in the form of short term and long term incentives) remuneration, consistent with the key principles of the Company’s remuneration strategy discussed above, keeping the majority of Executive remuneration “at risk”, with total remuneration comprising equal proportions of fixed remuneration, short term and long term incentives. Review of Short Term Incentive Review of Long Term Incentive Introduction of two Long Term Incentive performance conditions Continue Targeting Earnings Growth The Board determined to continue using growth in EPS as a performance condition for the 2010/11 STI, coupled with, where relevant for a particular Executive, the EBIT of a business segment in the Group. In addition, non-financial conditions will be used, such conditions not to exceed 20% of the STI opportunity for a particular Executive. Establishing non-financial performance conditions for part of the STI enables the Group to also reward how the results are being achieved, for example, in accordance with the Group’s Values, “Own.Breakout.Deliver.” Performance Rights Plan to Remain With regard to the future LTI plans (including for the three year period to 30 September 2013, the 2010/13 LTI plan), it was determined to maintain the design of the plan as being a performance rights plan which entitles a participant to acquire ordinary shares in the Company for no consideration at a later date, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. Move to Relative TSR and EPS Growth The Board determined to adopt the following performance conditions for future LTI plans, thereby continuing to strongly link Executive reward and returns to shareholders: • the Company’s total shareholder returns, relative to a comparator group, the S&P/ASX 100, with vesting of the performance rights attached to this condition starting where the Company’s TSR is above the 50th percentile of the companies in the comparator group, ranked by their TSR performance and full vesting in the performance rights attached to this condition occurring where the Company’s TSR is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the companies in the comparator group ranked by their TSR performance; and • Earnings Per Share growth, with vesting of the performance rights attached to this condition starting where the compound annual growth rate of the Company’s EPS over the performance period, from the base year (the financial year ended 30 September 2010), is equal to or greater than 7% per annum with full vesting in the performance rights attached to this condition occurring where the compound annual growth rate of the Company’s EPS over the performance period is 15% or greater. This condition is designed to give a total shareholder return equivalent to the top quartile of comparable companies in a three year period. These performance conditions are equally weighted and will apply to the 2010/13 LTI Plan. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 15 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report B. Non-Executive Director Remuneration Incitec Pivot’s policy is to: • remunerate non-executive directors by way of fees and payments which may be in the form of cash, non-cash benefits and superannuation benefits; and • set the level of non-executive directors’ fees and payments to be consistent with the market and to enable Incitec Pivot to attract and retain directors of an appropriate calibre. Non-executive directors are not remunerated by way of options, shares, performance rights, bonuses nor by incentive-based payments. Non-executive directors receive a fee for being a director of the Board and non-executive directors, other than the Chairman of the Board, receive additional fees for either chairing or being a member of a Board Committee. The level of fees paid to a non-executive director is determined by the Board after an annual review and reflects a non-executive director’s time commitments and responsibilities. For the 2009/10 financial year, there was a freeze on fees paid to non-executive directors. In aggregate, the fees paid to non-executive directors amounted to $1,335,000, below the $2,000,000 limit approved by shareholders at the 2008 Annual General Meeting. Non-executive directors joining the Board after 31 May 2003 are not entitled to receive a retirement benefit. There are two non-executive directors who were appointed before 1 June 2003, Mr J Watson and Mr A McCallum, who have contractual rights to a retirement benefit. The contracts, which were entered into prior to the merger with Incitec Fertilizers Limited in 2003, provide that on their respective retirements from the Board, on condition of them serving 10 years on the Board, each of Mr Watson and Mr McCallum receive a payment calculated as to approximately 54% of the aggregate remuneration they respectively receive from the Company in the three years immediately preceding their date of retirement, where the percentage represents their years of service from the date of appointment to 31 May 2003, as a proportion of 10 years service. Table B.1: Non-executive directors’ remuneration Details of the non-executive directors’ remuneration for the financial year ended 30 September 2010 are set out in the following table: For the year ended 30 September 2010 Non-executive directors Current J C Watson, Chairman(1) A C Larkin J Marlay A D McCallum(1) G Smorgon(2) P V Brasher(3) Former B Healey(4) Total non-executive directors Short-term benefits(A) Fees $000 410 410 187 187 176 168 177 185 155 118 1 – – 40 1,106 1,108 Year 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 Post-employment benefits Superannuation benefits Other long term benefits(B) $000 $000 41 41 18 18 17 17 18 18 15 12 0 – – – 109 106 85 106 – – – – 35 46 – – – – – – 120 152 Total $000 536 557 205 205 193 185 230 249 170 130 1 – – 40 1,335 1,366 (A) Apart from the fees paid or payable to the non-executive directors, no other short term benefits were paid or are payable in respect of the reporting period. (B) Consistent with best practice, with the exception of the contractual entitlements for Mr Watson and Mr McCallum who were appointed to the Board before 1 June 2003, the Company does not pay additional benefits to non-executive directors. (1) If Mr Watson or Mr McCallum had ceased to be a director on 30 September 2010, the following benefits would have been payable under their respective contracts: Mr Watson $704,000, Mr McCallum $307,000. (2) The disclosures for the 2008/09 financial year are with effect from Mr Smorgon’s appointment to the Board as a non-executive director on 19 December 2008. (3) On 29 September 2010, Mr Brasher was appointed to the Board by the directors. The disclosures for the 2009/10 financial year are with effect from Mr Brasher’s appointment to the Board as a non-executive director on 29 September 2010. (4) On 19 December 2008, Mr Healey retired as a non-executive director. The disclosures for the 2008/09 financial year are from 1 October 2008 to 19 December 2008. 16 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 C. Executive Remuneration Executive remuneration policy and practice The remuneration of the Executives is set by the Board. The relative proportion of the Executives’ total remuneration packages for the 2009/10 financial year that is performance- based is set out in the table below, and indicates a majority of the Executives’ total remuneration is “at risk” (64 – 67%). In alignment with its remuneration strategy, the Board’s policy on executive remuneration is that it should comprise both a fixed component (fixed annual remuneration) and an “at risk” or performance related component (being short term and long term incentives) where the mix between fixed annual remuneration and that “at risk” may vary according to the duties and responsibilities of an Executive. Remuneration arrangements for Executives are reviewed annually to ensure the arrangements continue to remain market competitive and consistent with the strategy of creating sustained shareholder value and in alignment with the Group’s business strategy. Overall the structure of executive remuneration is designed such that the Executives’ total remuneration package is determined by reference to the top 25 performing companies (by reference to total shareholder return) of the S&P/ ASX 26 – 100. Table C.1: Remuneration structures by level % of Total Remuneration (annualised) Fixed Remuneration Performance-based Remuneration Managing Director & CEO Executives (1) FAR 33% 36% STI 33% 29% LTI 34% 35% (1) For the purpose of the above table, the information regarding the Executives does not include the President – New Markets or the former General Manager – Explosives. For the President – New Markets, the relative proportions were as follows: fixed remuneration – 48%, STI – 28% and LTI – 24%. For the former General Manager – Explosives, the relative proportions were as follows: fixed remuneration – 36%, STI – 35% and LTI – 29%. In calculating the “at risk” compensation as a proportion of total remuneration for the 2009/10 year, for each Executive, the maximum entitlement under the STI or LTI was taken into account. Key features of the components of Executive remuneration The following tables set out the key features of the three components of Executive remuneration that are relevant to the 2009/10 financial year. Fixed annual remuneration Set out below is a summary of the key features of the fixed annual remuneration for the Executives relevant to the 2009/10 financial year. Fixed annual remuneration Who receives fixed annual remuneration? What is the purpose of the fixed annual remuneration component? The terms of employment for each of the Executives contain a fixed annual remuneration component. The purpose of the fixed component is to remunerate the Executives at a level that is market competitive and reflects the experience and performance of the individual Executive. What is included in fixed annual remuneration? Executives may receive their fixed annual remuneration in a variety of forms, including cash, superannuation and fringe benefits, such as motor vehicles. When is fixed annual remuneration reviewed? The level of fixed annual remuneration is reviewed by the Board annually with reference to, among other things, market data provided by an appropriately qualified and independent external consultant. In setting the level of the fixed component of remuneration regard is had to the median of that paid by companies of a comparable size for similar roles. When does an increase in fixed annual remuneration take effect? If the Board determines that there will be an increase in the fixed annual remuneration for an Executive, the increase ordinarily takes effect from 1 January in the relevant financial year. What was the fixed annual remuneration for the Executives for the year ended 30 September 2010? For the 2009/10 financial year, having regard to the financial performance of the Company and the global financial environment, it was determined by the Board that the fixed annual remuneration for the Executives would not be increased from the 2008/09 levels, save where roles and responsibilities changed during the year. Refer to table C.3 for details of the fixed annual remuneration for the Executives for the year ended 30 September 2010. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 17 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report At risk remuneration – Short Term Incentive (STI) Plan Set out below is a summary of the key features of the STI component of remuneration for the Executives relevant to the 2009/10 financial year. STI Plan What is the STI? The STI is an annual “at risk” cash bonus which is dependent on the achievement of particular performance conditions in the financial year to 30 September 2010. Who participates in the STI Plan? All of the Executives (as well as other selected employees) participate in the STI Plan. Why does the Board consider the STI to be an appropriate incentive? The Board considers the STI is appropriate as it encourages the Executives to support Incitec Pivot’s strategic objectives by putting a large proportion of the Executives’ remuneration “at risk” against meeting challenging performance targets linked to the Group’s annual business objectives. What are the criteria for awarding the STI to Executives? Why were these criteria chosen? STI awards are not an entitlement, but rather a reward for annual Group performance and individual performance or contribution to overall Group performance. The criteria for awarding the STI is the satisfaction of performance conditions. The performance conditions used are EPS growth from the prior year and, where relevant for a particular Executive, the EBIT of a particular business segment in the Group coupled with, where appropriate, non-financial performance conditions. In respect of EPS, this is considered an appropriate financial measure because it aligns Executive reward with the creation of shareholder value. In addition, by also using the EBIT of a business segment as a measure for Executives in relevant business segments, this ensures robust alignment of performance in a particular business segment with reward for the Executive managing that business segment. Further, establishing non- financial performance conditions for part of the STI enables the Group to also reward how the results are being achieved, for example, in accordance with the Group’s Values, “Own.Breakout.Deliver”. When are the criteria set? The criteria for awarding the STI were set by the Board at the commencement of the 2009/10 financial year. What is the method for determining if the criteria are satisfied? The method for determining if performance conditions are met is, for financial performance conditions, based on a review of the audited accounts for the financial year and, for any non-financial performance conditions, based on the review by the Board of recommendations made by the Remuneration and Appointments Committee following the annual performance review process for the Executives. What STI awards were made to Executives with respect to the year ended 30 September 2010? With EPS having grown 20.8% for the year ended 30 September 2010 and having regard to the EBIT for relevant business segments as set out on page 10 of the directors’ report, Executives were entitled to awards under the 2009/10 STI. Refer to tables C.3 and C.4 for further details of STI awards to Executives for the year ended 30 September 2010. No Executives were awarded STI payments under the 2008/09 STI. 18 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 At risk remuneration – Long Term Incentive (LTI) Plans General summary of the LTI Plans Set out below is a summary of the key features of the current LTI Plans. LTI Plans What are the Company’s LTI Plans that are relevant to the 2009/10 financial year? The current LTI Plans are: • Long Term Incentive Performance Share Plan for 2007/10 (loan-backed share-based plan) (LTI 2007/10); What is the purpose of the LTIs? What is the design of the LTI Plans? • Long Term Incentive Performance Rights Plan for 2008/11 (LTI 2008/11); and • Long Term Incentive Performance Rights Plan for 2009/12 (LTI 2009/12). In addition there are incentive arrangements for Executives and other selected employees based outside of Australia (see ‘What are the Long Term Incentive Performance Cash Plans?’ below). Details of the Executives’ participation in these plans are set out in tables C.6 and C.7. The LTIs are the long term incentive component of remuneration for employees, including the Executives, who are able to influence the sustained generation of shareholder value through their direct contribution to the Company’s performance. The LTIs are designed to link reward with the key performance drivers which underpin sustainable growth in shareholder value – which comprises both share price growth and returns to shareholders. By rewards resulting in share ownership on the achievement of demanding targets, this ties remuneration to Company performance as experienced by shareholders. The arrangements also support the Company’s strategy for retention and motivation of the Executives and senior employees. The LTI 2007/10 was a loan-backed share-based plan with a performance period over three years and performance conditions based on Incitec Pivot’s TSR, being the percentage increase in the Company’s share price over the three year performance period plus the after tax value of dividends paid, assuming the dividends are reinvested in the Company’s shares (Absolute TSR). The LTI 2008/11 and LTI 2009/12 are performance rights plans which also have a performance period of three years and performance conditions based on Absolute TSR. What is the method for determining if the criteria are satisfied? The method for determining if the performance conditions are met is to test the performance conditions once only, following the end of the relevant performance period. This is done by reviewing the share price over the three year performance period and taking into account dividends paid. What are the Long Term Incentive Performance Cash Plans? Certain employees and Executives based in some jurisdictions participate in long term incentive cash plans which are operated by the Group, through its offshore entities. These cash plans are designed to deliver a similar benefit to those outlined above on achievement of sustained performance over the relevant three year performance period, with similar conditions as the Long Term Incentive Performance Rights Plans. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 19 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report LTI 2007/10 Who participates in LTI 2007/10? Executives and other selected managers. What form does the LTI 2007/10 take? For details of the Executives’ participation in this Plan refer to tables C.6 and C.7. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Incitec Pivot LTI Plan Company Pty Ltd, provides to participants limited recourse loans bearing interest at the fringe benefits tax benchmark rate (currently 6.65%) for the sole purpose of acquiring shares in Incitec Pivot. How do the loans to the participants work? The loans are applied to acquire shares on market which avoids dilution of other shareholdings. ASX Listing Rule 10.14 provides that no shareholder approval is required. Participants may not deal in the shares while the loan remains outstanding. Net cash dividends after personal income tax obligations are applied to reduce the loan balance throughout the term of the loan. If, at the end of the performance period, the performance of the Company and the participant meets or exceeds the performance criteria which were set by the Board at the commencement of the performance period, part of the loan may be forgiven. The amount of the loan forgiven (if any) will be determined according to the performance achieved and will be net of fringe benefits tax. The balance of the loan must be repaid prior to any dealing in the shares, on cessation of employment or, at the latest, a sunset date which is three months after the expiry of the performance period, unless extended by the Company. What is the performance period for this plan? 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2010. What is the performance criteria and how is the criteria set? The Board set the criteria for the granting of awards at the beginning of the three year performance period. The criteria focus on financial performance of the Company and include a condition relating to duration of employment. The LTI performance condition is based on Absolute TSR. For the performance condition to be satisfied in full, Absolute TSR must be at least 20% per annum compounded over the three year period. If, at the end of the performance period, Absolute TSR is less than 10% per annum compounded over the three year period, no awards in the form of loan forgiveness are granted. In setting these performance conditions, the Board considered it had established an aggressive target to promote behaviour to achieve superior performance, noting the granting of an award (in the form of loan forgiveness) commences only where Absolute TSR exceeds 10% per annum compounded over the performance period with a full award requiring Absolute TSR of 20% per annum compounded over the performance period. For example, for 50% of an award to be capable of being granted, Absolute TSR of 15% per annum compounded over the performance period would be required. If a participant leaves before the end of the performance period, the participant is deemed to have agreed to sell the relevant shares and the proceeds of sale will be applied against any outstanding loan amount. If a participant’s employment terminates by reason of death, total and permanent disablement or for any other reason as determined by the Board, the Board may determine that part of the loan may be forgiven. If a participant leaves after the end of the performance period, the participant must decide to repay the loan or direct that the relevant shares be sold. What happens if a participant in the plan leaves the Group? What awards have been granted under the LTI 2007/10? As the Company’s TSR is 2.64% per annum compounded over the three years to 30 September 2010, no awards have been granted under the LTI 2007/10. Accordingly, the loan to the participants will not be forgiven. The shares will be sold and the proceeds applied against the outstanding loan amount with no recourse to the participant for any shortfall. 20 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 LTI 2008/11 LTI 2009/12 Who participates in the LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12? Executives and other selected managers participate in the LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12. What form do the LTI 2008/11 and LTI 2009/12 take? What is the process for deciding who will participate in the LTI plans? For details of the Executives’ participation in these Plans refer to tables C.6 and C.7. Both plans are ‘performance rights’ plans which entitle the participant to acquire ordinary shares in the Company for no consideration at a later date, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. As no shares are issued until exercise, performance rights have no dividend entitlement. The decision to grant performance rights and to whom they will be granted is made annually by the Board, noting that the grant of performance rights to the Managing Director is subject to shareholder approval. Grants of performance rights to participants are based on a percentage of the relevant participant’s fixed annual remuneration. Whether or not those performance rights will vest is determined in accordance with the plan rules for the LTI 2008/11 and LTI 2009/12. What are the performance periods for these plans? The performance period for the LTI 2008/11 is 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2011. The performance period for the LTI 2009/12 is 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2012. What are the conditions for the performance rights under the plans to vest and who approved the conditions? When do performance rights lapse? What happens if a participant leaves the Group? Do participants pay for the performance rights or the shares issued on exercise of performance rights? The performance rights will only vest if certain conditions are met. The Board approved the conditions on the commencement of the relevant plans. The conditions focus on the performance of the Company and include a condition relating to duration of employment. The performance condition is based on Absolute TSR. If, at the end of the relevant performance period, Absolute TSR: • is equal to or less than 10% per annum compounded over the performance period, none of the performance rights vest; is greater than 10% and less than 20% per annum compounded over the performance period, an increasing proportion of the performance rights will vest from zero on a straight line basis; and is 20% or more per annum compounded over the performance period, all of the performance rights will vest. • • In setting this condition, the Board considered it had established an aggressive target to promote behaviour to achieve superior performance. For the LTI 2008/11 and LTI 2009/12, the Board adopted Absolute TSR as the measure for the performance condition to ensure there is a direct link between reward and returns to shareholders, thereby aligning participants’ performance with the creation of sustained shareholder value. Performance rights will lapse if the performance conditions are not satisfied during the performance period or, in certain circumstances, if a participant ceases to be employed by the Group during the performance period. Performance rights will also lapse if they are not exercised within five years from their grant date. Generally, the performance rights will lapse except where the participant has died, become totally and permanently disabled, is retrenched or retires. In those circumstances, the performance rights may be reduced pro rata to the proportion of days worked during the relevant performance period. Participants do not pay for the performance rights or shares. What performance rights have vested under the LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12? None. The LTI 2008/11 and LTI 2009/12 are each for a three year period and the performance conditions will not be tested until after 30 September 2011 and 30 September 2012 respectively. Which Executives have been granted performance rights under these plans? Refer to table C.6 in respect of performance rights granted to Executives. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 21 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report Analysis of relationship between the Group’s performance, shareholder wealth and remuneration In considering the Group’s performance, the benefit to shareholders and appropriate remuneration for the Executives and other selected senior employees, the Board, through its Remuneration and Appointments Committee, has regard to financial and non- financial indices, including the following indices in respect of the current financial year and the preceding four financial years. Table C.2: Indices relevant to the Board’s assessment of the Group’s performance and the benefit to shareholders Net Profit After Tax excluding minority interests (before individually material items) (NPAT (before IMI)) ($m) Earnings Per Share (before individually material items) (EPS (before IMI)) (cents) Dividends – paid in the financial year – per share (cents) Dividends – declared in respect of the financial year – per share (DPS (declared)) (cents) Share price ($) (Year End) TSR (Annual) (%) Absolute TSR (3 Year Compound per annum) (%) 2006(1) 2007(1) 2008(2) 2009 2010 82.8 202.5 647.5 347.8 442.8 7.3 3.6 5.2 20.1 60.5 22.6 27.3 7.5 21.8 21.6 15.0 29.7 4.4 4.1 7.8 1.29 4.28 5.07 2.83 3.59 70 22 242 74 25 93 (43) 42 30 3 (1) In respect of years 2006 and 2007, all indices except for Net Profit After Tax excluding minority interests (before individually material items) have been restated as a result of the 20:1 share split approved by shareholders in September 2008. (2) Restated for change in accounting standard. In the financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2009, the Group’s prior year Income Statement (i.e. in respect of the year ended 30 September 2008) was restated (reduced) by $13.8m ($9.7m net of tax) thereby reducing NPAT (before individually material items) from $657.2m to $647.5m. The “at risk” or performance related components of the Executives’ total remuneration, in the form of short term and long term incentives, reward Executives only where value is delivered to shareholders, directly linking the reward to the Group’s financial results and its overall performance, in the case of the long term incentive, over a sustained period of three years. The charts on the following page demonstrate the total shareholder return to shareholders in the Company, compounded over three years, and notably: • for the long term incentive plan for 2006/09 which matured on 30 September 2009 (LTI 2006/09), Absolute TSR was 42.2% per annum compounded over the three year period to 30 September 2009, 111% higher than the stretch measure of 20% per annum compounded over the period. Accordingly, awards were made in full to Executives, with the reward linked to value delivered to shareholders; and • for the LTI 2007/10, Absolute TSR was 2.64% per annum compounded over the three year period to 30 September 2010. Accordingly, no awards were made to Executives, noting the share price had decreased over the three years from $4.28 to $3.59 at the respective year ends in the period and dividends paid had fallen in the period. In relation to the short term incentives, for the STI Plan 2009/10 EPS has grown 20.8% for the year ended 30 September 2010 and accordingly, as referred to in table C.4, Executives have been awarded short term incentives in cash. In the past, awards under STI Plans have only been made where the Net Profit, measured after tax and before individually material items, has increased, year on year. Net Profit was previously used as the principal measure for the STI as, absent capital initiatives, it equated to Earnings Per Share. While the measure for these prior plans was expressed as Net Profit, measured after tax and before individually material items, the levels at which awards could be made were determined by reference to EPS growth, year on year and linked reward with value delivered to shareholders. For example, as can be seen from the above indices: • in 2009, Net Profit, measured after tax and before individually material items, was $347.8m, a decrease of 46% on the prior year, 2008. Further, EPS decreased 63% on the prior year, noting that Incitec Pivot had made a non-renounceable entitlement offer in November 2008. Accordingly, no awards were made to the Executives under the 2008/09 STI Plan; and • in 2008, Net Profit, measured after tax and before individually material items, was $647.5m, an increase of 220% on the prior year, and EPS was 60.5 cents, an increase of 201%. Accordingly, awards were made in full in respect of this performance condition under the 2007/08 STI Plan. Likewise, in 2007, Net Profit, measured after tax and before individually material items, was $202.5m, an increase of 145% on the prior year, and EPS was 20.1 cents, an increase of 175%. Accordingly, awards were made in full in respect of this performance condition under the 2006/07 STI Plan. 22 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Net Profit After Tax excluding minority interests (before individually material items) $m and Dividends Per Share cents declared(1) Earnings Per Share (before individually material items) cents(1) and Year End Share price $(1) Absolute Total Shareholder Return (3 Year Compound per annum) %(1) and Year End Share price $(1) $m 800 600 400 200 0 cents 40 30 20 10 0 06 07 08 09 10 NPAT (before IMI) DPS (declared) cents 60 40 20 0 06 07 08 09 10 EPS (before IMI) Year end share price $ 6 4 2 0 % 90 60 30 0 IPL 3 Year Share Price Performance versus ASX100 from 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2010 Index : 100 : 1/10/07 $ 6 4 2 0 06 07 08 09 10 Absolute TSR (3 Year compound pa)% Year end share price 250 200 150 100 50 0 Sep 07 Dec 07 Mar 08 Jun 08 Sep 08 Dec 08 Mar 09 Jun 09 Sep 09 Dec 09 Mar 10 Jun 10 Sep 10 IPL share price ASX100 Index (1) In respect of years 2006 and 2007, all indices except for Net Profit After Tax excluding minority interests (before individually material items) have been restated as a result of the 20:1 share split approved by shareholders in September 2008. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 23 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report Executives’ remuneration arrangements Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer Mr James Fazzino was appointed as Managing Director & CEO on 29 July 2009. The terms of Mr Fazzino’s appointment as Managing Director & CEO are set out in a single contract of service dated 29 July 2009. Details of the nature and amount of each element of remuneration of the Managing Director & CEO are included in table C.3. The following is a summary of Mr Fazzino’s employment arrangements and remuneration. Fixed annual remuneration Mr Fazzino’s fixed annual remuneration is $1,800,000, reviewed annually having regard to Incitec Pivot’s executive remuneration policy. Any changes to Mr Fazzino’s fixed annual remuneration ordinarily come into effect on 1 January of the relevant financial year. For the 2009/10 financial year, as part of the annual review, no increase was made. STI LTI Termination by Incitec Pivot Termination by Managing Director & CEO Effect of termination on long term incentives Mr Fazzino is eligible to participate in Incitec Pivot’s STI Plan. For 2009/10, Mr Fazzino’s STI opportunity was between 50% and 100% of his fixed annual remuneration and was determined by reference to EPS growth in the 2009/10 financial year. Given EPS has grown 20.8% in the 2009/10 financial year, Mr Fazzino was awarded a STI payment of $1,800,000 in respect of the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010. Mr Fazzino currently participates in the following LTI Plans: • the LTI 2007/10 in respect of which Mr Fazzino is the holder of 137,240 shares in the Company; • the LTI 2008/11 pursuant to which Mr Fazzino was issued 222,482 performance rights as approved by shareholders in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules at the 2008 Annual General Meeting held on 19 December 2008; and • the LTI 2009/12 pursuant to which Mr Fazzino was issued 600,000 performance rights as approved by shareholders in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules at the 2009 Annual General Meeting held on 23 December 2009. For the LTI 2007/10, Mr Fazzino’s LTI opportunity was between 50% and 100% of fixed annual remuneration and was determined by reference to a performance condition based on Absolute TSR for the three year performance period to 30 September 2010. For an award, in the form of loan forgiveness, to be made, Absolute TSR of 10% per annum compounded over the performance period was required. In order for the performance condition to be satisfied in full, Absolute TSR of at least 20% per annum compounded over the performance period was required. As the Absolute TSR is 2.64% per annum compounded over the three years, Mr Fazzino did not receive an award by way of loan forgiveness in respect of the three year performance period ended 30 September 2010. Mr Fazzino remains the registered holder of the shares acquired with the loan and the shares will be sold on-market and the proceeds applied towards the loan. The LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12 are each for a three year period and the performance conditions will not be tested until after 30 September 2011 and 30 September 2012 respectively. The Company may terminate Mr Fazzino’s employment: • immediately for cause, without payment of any separation payment, save as to accrued fixed annual remuneration, accrued annual leave and long service leave; • otherwise, without cause, with or without notice, in which case the Company must pay a separation payment plus accrued fixed annual remuneration, accrued annual leave and long service leave. The separation payment will be equal to 52 weeks of fixed annual remuneration as at the date of termination. The agreement provides that Mr Fazzino may terminate his employment on six months’ notice. In respect of the LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12, generally, the performance rights will lapse except in circumstances of death, total and permanent disablement, retrenchment or retirement. In those circumstances, the performance rights may be reduced pro rata to the proportion of days worked during the relevant performance period. 24 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Executive Team Remuneration and other terms of employment for the Executives (excluding Mr Fazzino, whose arrangements are set out on the previous page) are formalised in service agreements between the Executive and the Group, details of which are summarised in the table below. Most Executives are engaged on similar contractual terms, with minor variations to address differing circumstances. The Group’s policy is for service agreements for the Executives to be unlimited in term, but capable of termination in the manner as described in the table below. Details of the nature and amount of each element of remuneration of the Executives are included in table C.3. Fixed annual remuneration STI LTI Fixed annual remuneration comprises salary paid in cash and mandatory employer superannuation contributions. Fixed annual remuneration may also come in other forms such as fringe benefits (eg. motor vehicles). This component of remuneration is subject to annual review and any changes to fixed annual remuneration ordinarily come into effect on 1 January of the relevant financial year. For the 2009/10 financial year, the fixed annual remuneration for the Executives was not increased from the 2008/09 levels, save where roles and responsibilities changed during the year. Participation is at the Board’s discretion. For all Executives, for the 2009/10 year, the STI opportunity was 40% of fixed annual remuneration up to a maximum of 80% of fixed annual remuneration (except for Mr Atkinson whose STI opportunity was 30% to a maximum of 60% of fixed annual remuneration) and was determined with reference to performance conditions outlined on page 18. Mr Grace, as the Moranbah Project Director, participates in an additional incentive linked to construction of the Moranbah ammonium nitrate complex. Participation is at the Board’s discretion. For all Executives the LTI opportunity is 50% of fixed annual remuneration up to a maximum of 100% of fixed annual remuneration for each plan in which they participate (except for Mr Atkinson whose LTI opportunity is 25% to a maximum of 50% of fixed annual remuneration) and the awards or vesting of rights (as applicable) is determined with reference to conditions based on Absolute TSR. Termination by Incitec Pivot(1) Incitec Pivot may terminate the service agreements: • immediately for cause, without payment of any separation sum, save as to accrued fixed annual remuneration, accrued annual leave and long service leave; • on notice in the case of incapacity, and the Company must pay a separation payment plus accrued fixed annual remuneration, accrued annual leave and long service leave; • otherwise, without cause, with or without notice and the Company must pay a separation payment plus accrued fixed annual remuneration, accrued annual leave and long service leave. The amount of a separation payment is calculated on a ‘capped’ number of weeks basis as set out in the contract with each Executive and, in the case of Mr Walsh, his contractual entitlement has regard to the length of prior service with the Orica group. The following table sets out the separation payment for each Executive. Mr Frank Micallef(2) Mrs Kerry Gleeson Mr Bernard Walsh Mr Alan Grace Mr James Whiteside Mr Gary Brinkworth(3) Mr Stephen Dawson(4) Mr Brian Wallace(5) Mr Jamie Rintel(6) Mr Simon Atkinson(7) Current Fixed Annual Remuneration $’000 660 594 648 486 486 486 476 530 528 416 Number of Weeks 26.0 weeks 26.0 weeks 61.81 weeks 26.0 weeks 45.41 weeks 26.0 weeks 26.0 weeks 26.0 weeks 26.0 weeks 52.0 weeks Separation Payment $’000 330 297 770 243 424 243 238 265 264 416 Termination by the Executive(1) An Executive may terminate his/her employment on 13 weeks’ notice (save for Mr Grace and Mr Atkinson who may terminate on 8 weeks’ notice) and the Company may require the Executive to serve out the notice period or may make payment in lieu. Effect of termination on long term incentives In respect of the LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12, generally, the performance rights will lapse except in circumstances of death, total and permanent disablement, retrenchment or retirement. In those circumstances, the performance rights may be reduced pro rata to the proportion of days worked during the relevant performance period. (1) In respect of the former General Manager – Explosives, the Group was entitled to terminate his contract on 52 weeks’ notice and the former General Manager – Explosives was entitled to terminate his contract without notice. In respect of the former General Manager – Human Resources, the Group was entitled to terminate his contract on 26 weeks notice and the former General Manager – Human Resources was entitled to terminate his contract on 13 weeks’ notice. (2) On 23 October 2009, Mr Micallef was appointed Chief Financial Officer and his current fixed annual remuneration and STI and LTI participation is as specified in the table above. (3) With effect from March 2010 and in addition to his role as General Manager, Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, Mr Brinkworth took functional responsibility for human resources for the Group. (4) Mr Dawson is considered to be a Key Management Person from 12 November 2009 and his current fixed annual remuneration and STI and LTI participation is as specified in the table above. (5) Mr Wallace is considered to be a Key Management Person from 12 November 2009 and his current fixed annual remuneration and STI and LTI participation is as specified in the table above. US$ converted to A$ at an average exchange rate for the period from 12 November 2009 to 30 September 2010 of 0.89838. (6) US$ converted to A$ at an average exchange rate for the year ended 30 September 2010 of 0.90087. (7) Mr Atkinson is considered to be a Key Management Person from 1 January 2010 and his current fixed annual remuneration and STI and LTI participation is as specified in the table above. Following a restructure of the Dyno Nobel business, Mr Atkinson was appointed as President – New Markets with effect from 1 June 2010. Immediately prior to this he was the Chief Financial Officer for the Dyno Nobel business. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 25 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report Details of Executive remuneration Table C.3 – Executive remuneration Details of the remuneration paid to Executives is set out below. For the year ended 30 September 2010 Short-term benefits Short Term Incentive & other bonuses(A) Salary & Fees Post- employment benefits Other long term benefits (C) Termination benefits Share-based payments Other Short Term benefits(B) Super- annuation benefits Accounting Value(D) Year $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 Executive Current J E Fazzino(1) Managing Director & CEO F Micallef(2) Chief Financial Officer K J Gleeson General Counsel & Company Secretary B C Walsh President – Global Manufacturing A Grace General Manager – Major Projects – Moranbah Project Director J Whiteside General Manager – Supply Chain & Trading G Brinkworth(3) General Manager – Incitec Pivot Fertilisers & Human Resources S Dawson(4) President – Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific B Wallace(5) President – Dyno Nobel Americas J Rintel President – Strategy & Business Development S Atkinson(6) President – New Markets Former K Lynch(7) General Manager – Human Resources D Brinker(8) General Manager – Explosives J Segal(9) Managing Director & CEO P Barber(10) General Manager – Australian Fertilisers Total Executives 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 1,785 1,559 1,800 – 601 – 579 569 633 622 471 463 471 463 427 353 408 – 454 – 489 389 301 – 27 569 164 1,040 – 1,070 – 90 528 – 475 – 451 – 389 – 389 – 389 – 381 – 255 – 393 – 258 – – – 383 – – – – – 6,810 7,187 6,091 – 26 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 – – – – – – – – – 2 9 14 – – 20 – 32 – 61 132 156 – – 86 176 244 – 9 – 93 454 580 15 14 14 – 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 13 13 – 16 – 15 14 11 – 1 14 35 55 – 9 – 3 38 315 – – 11 61 14 31 9 14 10 19 – – 12 – – – 24 – 6 – – – – – – 43 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1,003 – – 168 – – Total $000 4,069 2,337 1,271 – 1,255 926 1,305 980 1,025 702 431 449 128 – 175 282 192 313 141 209 141 220 1,035 730 85 9 42 – 108 – 93 55 41 – – 47 9 52 916 375 876 – 865 – 1,075 590 773 – 28 716 1,770 1,391 – 457 – 1,756 – – – 186 Proportion of remuneration performance related Share-based payments as proportion of remuneration % % 55% 19% 52% – 52% 30% 49% 32% 52% 30% 51% 30% 52% 2% 48% – 42% – 45% 9% 39% – 0% 7% 0.5% 4% – 26% – 0% 45% 20% 11% 19% 10% – 14% 30% 15% 32% 14% 30% 14% 30% 9% 2% 5% – 12% – 9% 9% 5% – 0% 7% 0.5% 4% – 26% – 0% 10% 20% 195 178 124 483 1,003 168 1,586 2,093 16,263 10,689 (A) Certain STI payments are awarded in US$. Such STI payments were converted to A$ at the spot rate on 30 September 2010, being 0.96890. No Executives were awarded STI payments under the 2008/09 STI. In respect of Mr. Brinker, on termination he received a payment in January 2010 in respect of his contractual entitlements established in 2008 as part of his employment arrangements. (B) Other short term benefits include the taxable value of fringe benefits paid attributable to the fringe benefits tax year (2010: 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2010) (2009: 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009), rent and mortgage interest subsidy, relocation allowances and other allowances. Additionally, all Executives are eligible to participate in an annual health assessment program designed to ensure Executives have their health status reviewed on a regular basis. (C) Other long term benefits represents long service leave accrued during the reporting period. (D) In accordance with accounting standards, the share-based payments accounting value included as remuneration represents the fair value of shares, treated as options, and rights that have not vested. The value disclosed in table C.3 represents the portion of fair value allocated to this reporting period and is not indicative of the benefit, if any, that may be received by the Executive should the performance conditions with respect to the relevant long term incentive plan be satisfied. In respect of the LTI 2007/10 the performance conditions have not been satisfied and, while the accounting value is recorded in the table above, the relevant Executives will not receive awards in the form of loan forgiveness with respect to participation in that plan. External valuation advice from PricewaterhouseCoopers has been used to determine the fair value at grant date of these shares, treated as options, and rights. The fair value at grant date is independently determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the share treated as an option or right, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the share, treated as an option, or right. The fair value has been allocated evenly over the performance period. Refer to section C of this Remuneration Report for further details of the LTI 2006/09, the LTI 2007/10, the LTI 2008/11, the LTI 2009/12, the LTI performance cash plans and LTIs generally. The terms and conditions of each grant affecting remuneration in this or future reporting periods are as follows: Grant date Vesting date Fair Value per share treated as option or right at grant date Date exercisable LTI 2007/10 12/11/2007 30/09/2010 $1.94(i) LTI 2008/11 19/12/2008 30/09/2011 LTI performance cash plan 2008/11 19/12/2008 30/09/2011 $0.30 $0.13 From 1/10/2010 From 1/10/2011 From 1/10/2011 LTI 2009/12 16/12/2009 30/09/2012 $1.60 From 1/10/2012 Exercise Price $4.41(i) $nil $nil $nil The number of shares, treated as options, and rights for the purposes of remuneration, held by each Executive is referred to in section C of this Remuneration Report and Note 35 to the financial statements. (i) Amounts have been restated as a result of the 20:1 share split approved by shareholders in September 2008. For 2009, the share-based payment remuneration includes, in respect of those Executives who were participants in the LTI interim performance share plan 2006/08, a true-up amount relating to the non-market performance conditions of this plan. (1) Mr Fazzino was appointed as Managing Director & CEO during the 2009 financial year. (2) Mr Micallef was appointed as Chief Financial Officer during the 2010 financial year. The disclosures for the 2010 financial year are from the date he became Chief Financial Officer, 23 October 2009. (3) Mr Brinkworth was appointed as an Executive during the 2009 financial year. The disclosures for the 2009 financial year are from his appointment date, 17 November 2008. (4) Mr Dawson became a Key Management Person during the 2010 financial year. The disclosures for the 2010 financial year are from the date he became a Key Management Person, 12 November 2009. (5) Mr Wallace became a Key Management Person during the 2010 financial year. The disclosures for the 2010 financial year are from the date he became a Key Management Person, 12 November 2009. (6) Mr Atkinson became a Key Management Person during the 2010 financial year. The disclosures for the 2010 financial year are from the date he became a Key Management Person, 1 January 2010. (7) On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company. (8) On 30 November 2009, Mr Brinker ceased employment with the Group. Mr Brinker’s termination benefits received during the reporting period include a separation payment, accrued holiday leave and relocation costs. Mr Brinker was entitled to the termination benefits under his employment contract. Except in relation to the termination benefits, Mr Brinker’s benefits were converted from US$ to A$ at the average exchange rate for 1 October 2009 to 30 November 2009 being 0.91323 (2009: average exchange rate for full year of 0.7321). Termination benefits were converted from US$ to A$ at the spot rate on 30 November 2009 being 0.91290. (9) On 8 May 2009, Mr Segal ceased to be employed by the Company. The disclosures for 2009 are from 1 October 2008 to that date. (10) On 31 December 2008, Mr Barber ceased to be employed by the Company. The disclosures for 2009 are from 1 October 2008 to that date. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 27 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report Details of performance related remuneration: short term incentive Table C.4 – Short term incentives awarded for the year ended 30 September 2010 Details of the vesting profile of the STI payments awarded for the year ended 30 September 2010 as remuneration to each Executive are set out below: Included in remuneration $000(A) % vested in year(B) % forfeited in year Short term incentive Executives Current J E Fazzino F Micallef K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J Whiteside G Brinkworth S Dawson B Wallace J Rintel S Atkinson Former K Lynch D Brinker 1,800 528 475 451 389 389 389 381 255 393 258 – – 100% 100% 100% 87% 100% 100% 100% 100% 65% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 0% 100% 100% (A) In relation to the STI, the amounts included in the remuneration for the financial year represent the amounts that vest in the financial year based on the satisfaction of performance conditions under the STI Plan. (B) Mr Fazzino, Mr Micallef, Mrs Gleeson, Mr Grace, Mr Whiteside, Mr Brinkworth, Mr Dawson, Mr Rintel and Mr Atkinson were each awarded their maximum available STIs. Mr Walsh was awarded 87% of his maximum STI opportunity and Mr Wallace was awarded 65% of his maximum STI opportunity. On that basis, Mr Fazzino received 100% of his fixed annual remuneration as a STI. Mr Micallef, Mrs Gleeson, Mr Grace, Mr Whiteside, Mr Brinkworth, Mr Dawson and Mr Rintel received 80% of their respective fixed annual remuneration as STIs, Mr Atkinson received 60% of his fixed annual remuneration as a STI, Mr Walsh received 69.6% of his fixed annual remuneration as a STI and Mr Wallace received 52% of his fixed annual remuneration as a STI. 28 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Details of performance related remuneration: long term incentives Table C.5 – Long term incentives granted and vested in the year ended 30 September 2010 Details of the shares, treated as options, and rights that were granted to each Key Management Person and those that vested during the reporting period are set out in the following table. For the year ended 30 September 2010 Key Management Personnel Grant date Granted during 2010 as remuneration(A) Number Vested during 2010(B) Number Executives Current J E Fazzino F Micallef K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J Whiteside G Brinkworth S Dawson B Wallace J Rintel S Atkinson(1) Former K Lynch(2) D Brinker(3) Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 23 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 16 December 2009 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 600,000 – 220,000 – 198,000 – 216,000 – 162,000 – 162,000 – 140,000 79,333 180,494 – 140,000 – 69,333 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – (A) For the 2009/10 financial year, this refers to the number of rights allocated to the participating Executives during the reporting period. (B) For the 2009/10 financial year, this refers to the number of shares, treated as options, that vested during the reporting period, noting that for the LTI 2007/10 no awards, in the form of loan forgiveness, were made. (1) Mr Atkinson’s performance rights were granted under the LTI 2009/12 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person. (2) On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company and was not a participant in the LTI 2009/12. (3) On 30 November 2009, Mr Brinker ceased employment with the Group and was not a participant in the LTI 2009/12. In respect of the shares, treated as options, and rights, details of the terms and conditions of each grant made during the reporting period are set out in section C of this Remuneration Report and in Notes 35 and 36 to the financial statements including: • the fair value per share or right at grant date, the exercise price per share or right, the amount, if any, paid or payable by the recipient, the expiry date and the date of exercise; and • a summary of the service and performance criteria that must be met before the beneficial interest vests in the person. Modification of terms of equity-settled share-based payment transactions No terms of equity-settled share-based payment transactions (including shares, treated as options, and rights) granted to a Key Management Person have been altered or modified by the issuing entity during the reporting period or the prior period. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 29 Directors’ Report Remuneration Report Table C.6 – Details of the vesting profile of long term incentives granted as remuneration Details of the vesting profile of the shares treated as options, and rights granted as remuneration to each Executive is detailed below: Grant date Number granted % Vested in year % Forfeited in year(A) Financial year in which grant vests Key Management Personnel Executives Current J E Fazzino F Micallef (1) K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J Whiteside G Brinkworth(2) S Dawson(3) B Wallace(4) J Rintel(5) S Atkinson(6) Former K Lynch(7) D Brinker(8) Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Cash Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Cash Plan 2008/11 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 23 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 19 December 2008 16 December 2009 137,240 222,482 600,000 22,520 46,838 220,000 86,680 128,806 198,000 96,320 140,515 216,000 67,420 105,386 162,000 67,420 105,386 162,000 – 98,361 140,000 – 55,738 79,333 33,280 100,984 180,494 15,160 81,967 140,000 19,500 46,838 69,333 53,240 128,806 – 66,680 207,738 – 0% – – 0% – – 0% – – 0% – – 0% – – 0% – – – – – – – – 0% – – 0% – – 0% – – – – – 0% – – 100% – – 100% – – 100% – – 100% – – 100% – – 100% – – – – – – – – 100% – – 100% – – 100% – – 100% 100% – 100% 61% – 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 (6) Mr Atkinson’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI 2007/10 and rights were granted under the LTI 2008/11 and the LTI 2009/12 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person on 1 January 2010. (7) On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company and was not a participant in the LTI 2009/12. (8) On 30 November 2009, Mr Brinker ceased employment with the Group and was not a participant in the LTI 2009/12. As a result of ceasing employment with the Group during the 2009/10 year, and in accordance with Mr. Brinker’s employment arrangements, a portion of Mr Brinker’s entitlements under the LTI performance cash plan 2008/11 were forfeited. In respect of the LTI 2007/10, the number of shares, treated as options, have been restated as a result of the 20:1 share split approved by shareholders in September 2008. For information on the number of shares for the purposes of remuneration held by Key Management Personnel, directly or indirectly, refer to Note 35 to the financial statements. The shares are fully paid. (A) The percentage forfeited in the year represents: (i) in the case of shares, treated as options, where no award, in the form of loan forgiveness, could be made due to the performance conditions not being achieved; and (ii) in the case of rights, the reduction in the maximum number of rights available to vest due to the performance conditions or other conditions not being achieved, noting that the LTI 2008/11 and LTI 2009/12 are not tested until 30 September 2011 and 30 September 2012 respectively. (1) Mr Micallef’s shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI 2007/10 and rights granted under the LTI 2008/11 were granted prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer on 23 October 2009. (2) Mr Brinkworth’s employment commenced on 17 November 2008 and he is not a participant in the LTI 2007/10. (3) Mr Dawson’s rights were granted under the LTI 2008/11 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person on 12 November 2009. Mr Dawson is not a participant in the LTI 2007/10. (4) Mr Wallace’s shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI 2007/10 and entitlements granted under the LTI performance cash plan 2008/11 were granted prior to him becoming a Key Management Person on 12 November 2009. (5) Mr Rintel’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI 2007/10 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person. 30 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Table C.7 – Analysis of movements in long term incentives during the year ended 30 September 2010 The movement during the reporting period, by value, of shares, treated as options, and rights for the purposes of remuneration held by each Executive is detailed below: For the year ended 30 September 2010 Key Management Personnel Executives Current J E Fazzino F Micallef(1) K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J Whiteside G Brinkworth(2) S Dawson(3) B Wallace(4) J Rintel(5) S Atkinson(6) Former K Lynch(7) D Brinker(8) Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Rights Plan 2008/11 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Performance Rights Plan 2009/12 Performance Cash Plan 2008/11 Performance Share Plan 2007/10 Performance Share Plan 2006/09 Grant date 23 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 19 December 2008 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 16 December 2009 19 December 2008 12 November 2007 1 December 2006 Granted during 2010 as remuneration(A) $000 Vested in year(B) $000 Forfeited in year(C) $000 Exercised in year(D) $000 960 – – 352 – – 317 – – 346 – – 259 – – 259 – – 224 – – 127 – – 289 – – 224 – – 111 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 266 – – 44 – – 168 – – 187 – – 131 – – 131 – – – – – – – – 65 – – 29 – – 38 – – 39 103 – – 17 129 – – – 305 – – – – – 193 – – 214 – – 140 – – 150 – – – – – – – – – – – 34 – – – – – – – – – – – (A) The value of rights granted in the year is the fair value of those rights (4) Mr Wallace’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI 2007/10 calculated at grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The value of these rights is included in the table above. This amount is allocated to the remuneration of the applicable Executive over the vesting period (i.e. in financial years 2010 to 2012 for the LTI 2009/12). (B) As the criteria under the LTI 2007/10 were not satisfied, no shares, treated as options, vested during the 2009/10 year. (C) The value of the shares, treated as options, and rights that were forfeited during the year represents the benefit foregone. (D) The value of shares, treated as options, exercised during the year represents where shares, treated as options, previously granted as compensation, were exercised (by the making of an award) during the reporting period. Awards (in the form of waivers of loans) were granted in relation to the LTI 2006/09. (1) Mr Micallef’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI 2007/10 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person. He is not a participant in the LTI 2006/09. (2) Mr Brinkworth’s employment commenced on 17 November 2008 and he is not a participant in either the LTI 2006/09 or the LTI 2007/10. (3) Mr Dawson’s rights were granted under the LTI 2008/11 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person on 12 November 2009. Mr Dawson is not a participant in either the LTI 2007/10 or the LTI 2006/09. prior to him becoming a Key Management Person on 12 November 2009. Mr Wallace is not a participant in the LTI 2006/09. (5) Mr Rintel’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI 2007/10 and the LTI 2006/09 prior to his appointment as an Executive. (6) Mr Atkinson’s rights were granted under the LTI 2009/12 and shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI 2007/10 prior to him becoming a Key Management Person on 1 January 2010. (7) Mr Lynch’s employment commenced on 18 February 2008 and he was not a participant in the LTI 2006/09. On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company. Mr Lynch was not a participant in the LTI 2009/12. (8) Mr Brinker’s employment commenced on 1 June 2008 and he was not a participant in the LTI 2006/09. On 30 November 2009, Mr Brinker ceased employment with the Group. Mr Brinker was not a participant in the LTI 2009/12. The minimum value of shares, which are treated as options, and rights yet to vest is $nil as the performance criteria may not be met and, in such circumstances, there would be no vesting. This does not apply to shares, which are treated as options, that vested during the reporting period. The maximum value of shares, which are treated as options, and rights yet to vest is not determinable as it depends on the market price of the Company’s shares on the ASX at the date of exercise. This does not apply to shares, which are treated as options, or rights, that vested during the reporting period. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 31 Directors’ Report Corporate Governance Statement The Board is committed to achieving and demonstrating the highest standards of corporate governance. Since Incitec Pivot’s listing on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in July 2003, the Board has implemented, and operated in accordance with, a set of corporate governance principles which the Board sees as fundamental to the Company’s continued growth and success and the achievement of its corporate ambition and strategy. The Board continues to review its corporate governance framework and practices to ensure they meet the interests of shareholders and are consistent with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (ASX Recommendations), revisions to which were released by the ASX Corporate Governance Council on 30 June 2010 and which are applicable to financial years commencing on or after 1 January 2011 (Revised Recommendations). Although the Revised Recommendations will not be applicable to Incitec Pivot until the 2011/12 financial year, the Board has reviewed its corporate governance framework and practices and where possible, at this stage, introduced changes, for example to its Charter for the Remuneration and Appointments Committee, and such changes are referred to in this Corporate Governance Statement. This Corporate Governance Statement outlines the key aspects of the Company’s corporate governance framework. This statement is structured and numbered in the order of the Principles set out in the ASX Recommendations. It includes cross-references to other relevant information in this Annual Report and the Company’s charters, policies and codes, details of which are available on the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. The Board considers that Incitec Pivot’s corporate governance framework and practices have complied with the ASX Recommendations throughout the year ended 30 September 2010. Summaries or copies of the charters, policies and codes referred to in this statement are available on the corporate governance section of Incitec Pivot’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight Role of the Board and management The Board of directors of Incitec Pivot is responsible for charting the direction, policies, strategies and financial objectives of the Company. The Board serves the interests of the Company and its shareholders, as well as Incitec Pivot’s other stakeholders such as employees, customers and the community, in a manner designed to create and continue to build sustainable value for the Company. The Board operates in accordance with the broad principles set out in its Board Charter. A copy of the Board Charter is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. The Charter sets out the Board’s own tasks and activities as well as the matters it has reserved for its own consideration and decision-making. The Board Charter has specifically reserved a number of key matters for consideration and decision by the Board. These responsibilities include: • Direction and objectives – approving the Company’s corporate strategy and budgets; • Compliance – ensuring and monitoring compliance with all laws, governmental regulations and accounting standards; 32 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 • Ethical – monitoring and influencing Incitec Pivot’s culture and implementing procedures and principles to promote ethical and responsible decision-making and confidence in Incitec Pivot’s integrity; and • Managing Director & CEO and direct reports – appointing the Managing Director & CEO and the direct reports to the Managing Director & CEO, monitoring management’s performance and reviewing executive succession planning. Each year, as provided for by the Board Charter, the Board undertakes an annual performance evaluation, comparing its performance against its Charter, setting objectives and effecting any improvements to the Charter. To assist the Board in meeting its responsibilities, the Board currently has the following three Committees: • the Audit and Risk Management Committee; • the Remuneration and Appointments Committee; and • the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee. The Board Charter provides that the Board may establish other committees of the Board from time to time as may be necessary to deal with specific matters. Each of these Committees has its own Charter which establishes the Committee’s terms of reference and operating procedures. In line with the Board Charter, each Board Committee is to review its performance at least annually, review its Charter annually, recommend any changes to the Board and report regularly to the Board as to its activities. Further information about the governance framework and activities of the Committees is set out in this statement. Day-to-day management of Incitec Pivot’s affairs and the implementation of the corporate strategy and policy initiatives are formally delegated to the Managing Director & CEO. The Delegated and Reserved Powers Policy details the authority delegated to the Managing Director & CEO, including the limits on the way in which the Managing Director & CEO can exercise that authority. A summary of the Delegated and Reserved Powers Policy is set out on the corporate governance section of the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. Management performance evaluation As part of the Board’s oversight of executive management, all Incitec Pivot executives are subject to annual performance reviews. The annual review involves each executive being evaluated by their immediate superior, normally the Managing Director & CEO. The executive is assessed against agreed performance objectives including business/financial/ operational targets, functional/managerial goals and personal accountabilities. The outcomes of performance reviews are directly related to remuneration levels for all executives. The Remuneration and Appointments Committee has overall responsibility for ensuring performance evaluation processes are in place for all executives and that such evaluations are linked to executive remuneration. Incitec Pivot’s policy in relation to executive remuneration is set out in the Remuneration Report. The Remuneration and Appointments Committee also considers the performance and remuneration of the Managing Director & CEO and makes recommendations as to his remuneration to the Board. The performance evaluation of the Managing Director & CEO is conducted by the Chairman and the Board. This evaluation involves an assessment of a range of performance standards as determined by the Board, including the overall performance of the Company. The Managing Director & CEO serves as a director until he ceases to be the Managing Director & CEO. The executive performance evaluations for the 2008/09 financial year were conducted in the final quarter of the 2009 calendar year in accordance with the process outlined above. Performance evaluations for the 2009/10 financial year are being conducted in the final quarter of the 2010 calendar year in accordance with the process outlined above. Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value Composition of the Board Incitec Pivot’s Constitution requires that the Company must have not less than three and no more than nine directors. Under the Company’s Board Charter, the number of directors and composition of the Board is determined having regard to what is appropriate for Incitec Pivot to achieve efficient and prudent decision making. The Board will consist of a majority of non-executive, independent directors. The Board comprises seven directors, including six non- executive directors and one executive director (being the Managing Director & CEO). The Company engages all non- executive directors by a letter of appointment setting out the key terms and responsibilities of their role. The directors were appointed on the following dates: John Watson: 15 December 1997; • • Allan McCallum: 15 December 1997; • Anthony Larkin: 1 June 2003; James Fazzino: 18 July 2005; • John Marlay: 20 December 2006; • • Graham Smorgon: 19 December 2008; and • Paul Brasher: 29 September 2010. Incitec Pivot aims to have directors with an appropriate range of skills, experience and expertise and an understanding of, and competence to deal with, current and emerging issues in the Group’s business. Incitec Pivot’s succession plans are designed to maintain an appropriate balance of skills, experience and expertise on the Board. In these respects, the Board collectively has significant commercial, business, operational and financial experience in a range of industries. The directors all bring skills and expertise which, in aggregate, combine to form a Board which is equipped to discharge its responsibilities. The directors’ biographies along with their term of office and information about their skills, expertise and experience are set out on pages 8 and 9 of this Annual Report. The ASX Listing Rules require that no member of the Board (other than the Managing Director & CEO) may serve for more than three years without being re-elected by shareholders at an annual general meeting of the Company. The Company’s Constitution provides that, at each annual general meeting, one-third of the directors (not including the Managing Director & CEO) must retire and are eligible to be re-elected by the shareholders. Mr Allan McCallum and Mr John Marlay are retiring by rotation and standing for re-election at the 2010 Annual General Meeting. Mr Paul Brasher, who was appointed by the Board as a director on 29 September 2010, will stand for re-election at the 2010 Annual General Meeting. The roles of Chairman and Managing Director & CEO are separate. The Board’s role is assisted by the Company Secretary. The Company Secretary is responsible for assisting the Chairman in developing and maintaining information systems and processes that are appropriate for the Board to fulfil its role and to achieve Incitec Pivot’s objectives. The Company Secretary is also responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures and the Constitution are complied with. The Board appoints and removes the Company Secretary and the Company Secretary is accountable to the Board, through the Chairman, on all governance matters. Board meetings Details of the Board meetings held during the 2009/10 financial year are set out on page 10 of this Annual Report. The Board holds 10 scheduled meetings during each year, plus any extraordinary meetings that may be necessary to address any significant matters, as and when they arise. Materials for Board meetings are circulated to directors in advance. The agendas for meetings are formulated with input from the Managing Director & CEO and the Chairman. Directors are free to nominate matters for inclusion on the agenda for any Board meeting. Presentations to the Board are frequently made by executives and senior management, and telecommunications technologies may be used to facilitate participation. Director independence The Board comprises a majority of independent non- executive directors. The Board, excluding the director in question, will regularly assess the independence of each director, in light of any interest disclosed by them. The Board considers all of the circumstances relevant to a director in determining whether the director is independent and free from any interest, relationship or matter which could, or may reasonably be expected to, interfere with the director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company. A range of factors is considered by the Board in assessing the independence of its directors, including those set out in the ASX Recommendations. In assessing the independence of a director, consideration is given to the underlying purpose behind any relationship a director may have with a third party that is identified as relevant to the assessment and overall purpose of independence. In determining whether a sufficiently material relationship (as defined in Box 2.1 of the ASX Recommendations) exists between Incitec Pivot and a third party for the purposes of determining the independence of a director, the Board has regard to all the circumstances of the relationship, including among other things: • the value (in terms of aggregate and proportionate expenses or revenues) that the relationship represents to both Incitec Pivot and the third party; • the strategic importance of the relationship to Incitec Pivot’s business; and • the extent to which the services provided by or to Incitec Pivot are integral to the operation of Incitec Pivot’s business, including the extent to which the services provided are unique and not readily replaceable. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 33 Directors’ Report Corporate Governance Statement The Board considers that each of John Watson, Allan McCallum, Anthony Larkin, John Marlay, Graham Smorgon and Paul Brasher are independent when assessed on the criteria above, taking into account all the relevant interests, matters and relationships of the particular director. As Managing Director & CEO of the Company, James Fazzino is not considered to be an independent director. In summary, of the seven directors, the Board considers six directors are independent. The Board Charter requires that an independent non-executive director hold the position of Chairman. Access to information and independent advice Directors are entitled to full access to the information required to discharge their responsibilities. Subject to obtaining the prior approval of the Chairman, the directors have the right to seek independent professional advice at Incitec Pivot’s expense to assist in carrying out their Board duties. Remuneration and Appointments Committee The Remuneration and Appointments Committee has a Charter approved by the Board. A copy of the Charter for the Remuneration and Appointments Committee is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. Under its Charter, the Committee: • nominations and appointments – assists and advises the Board on director selection and appointment practices, performance evaluation, Board composition, succession planning for the Board and senior management and oversees the development of strategies to address Board diversity; and • remuneration – assists and advises the Board on remuneration policies and practices for the Board, the Managing Director & CEO, the Executive Team, senior management and other employees, for such to be designed to enable Incitec Pivot to attract, retain and motivate its people to create value for shareholders. In relation to Board nominations and appointments, under the Board Charter, the process of selection and appointment of new directors to the Board is that, when a vacancy arises or an existing non-executive director retires, the Remuneration and Appointments Committee will, having regard to the skills and competencies represented on the Board and the competencies required, implement a process to identify suitable candidates with the process to include a search being undertaken by an appropriate third party. In turn, under the Remuneration and Appointments Committee Charter, the Committee will make recommendations to the Board for the appointment of new Board members having regard to a number of factors including a candidate’s judgment, skill, diversity and experience. When the Board considers that a suitable candidate has been found, that person is appointed by the Board to fill a casual vacancy in accordance with Incitec Pivot’s constitution, however must stand for re-election by shareholders at the next annual general meeting. The Committee comprises three independent non-executive directors, being John Marlay, John Watson and Allan McCallum. John Marlay was appointed as the Chairman of the Committee effective from February 2010. The Committee is to meet as frequently as required but not less than four times a year. The attendance of the members of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee at each meeting held during the 34 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 financial year to 30 September 2010 is set out on page 10 of this Annual Report. Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee The Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee has a Charter approved by the Board. A copy of the Charter is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. The Committee was established in February 2007 to assist the Board in discharging its overall responsibilities in relation to health, safety, environment and community matters arising out of the Company’s activities as they may affect employees, contractors, and the local communities in which it operates. The Charter provides for the Committee members to comprise at least four members, three of whom will be non-executive directors and one will be the Managing Director & CEO. The current members of the Committee are Allan McCallum (Chairman), John Watson, Anthony Larkin and James Fazzino. The Committee is to meet as frequently as required but not less than four times a year. The attendance of the members of the Health, Safety, Environment and Community Committee at each meeting held during the financial year to 30 September 2010 is set out on page 10 of this Annual Report. Performance evaluations Incitec Pivot recognises the importance of regular performance evaluations of its directors. Assessment of individual directors’ performance and the Board as a whole is a process determined by the Chairman and the Remuneration and Appointments Committee. The Board’s annual performance review took place in August 2010 by way of self-assessment of the Board’s role, structure and processes, as well as the Board’s performance in meeting its responsibilities under its Charter. The outcomes of that review are included in the 2010/11 objectives for the Board and will be implemented throughout the Company’s 2010/11 financial year. In addition, one-on-one interviews occurred between each director and the Chairman. For the directors who are retiring by rotation and standing for re-election at the 2010 Annual General Meeting, Mr Allan McCallum and Mr John Marlay, their performance was reviewed as part of their nomination for re-election. The Remuneration and Appointments Committee is responsible for developing and reviewing induction procedures for new appointees to the Board to enable them to effectively discharge their duties. The Charter for the Committee provides that the induction procedures should enable new appointees to gain an understanding of the Company’s financial, strategic, operational and risk management position, the culture and values of Incitec Pivot, the rights, duties and responsibilities of the directors, the roles and responsibilities of senior executives, the role of Board Committees and meeting arrangements and director interaction. In this respect, the Company is in compliance with the Revised Recommendations. Additionally, the Committee ensures that continuous education measures are in place to enhance director competencies, keep directors up to date and enhance directors’ knowledge and skills. The measures are to include having access to education concerning key developments in the Company and in the industry in which Incitec Pivot operates. In this respect, the Company is in compliance with the Revised Recommendations. Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible decision-making Codes of conduct Incitec Pivot is committed to operating to the highest standards of ethical behaviour and honesty with full regard for the safety and health of its employees, customers, the wider community and the environment. The Company has codes of conduct which set ethical standards for directors, senior management and employees. The codes describe core principles designed to ensure ethical conduct is maintained in the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. In particular, Incitec Pivot’s key codes of conduct, copies of which are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au, are: • Incitec Pivot’s Code of Ethics – Compliance Policies and Guide, which is a code of conduct for all employees. The Code’s key principles require employees to comply with the letter and spirit of the laws affecting Incitec Pivot’s business, as well as the Company’s policies and codes; to act honestly and with integrity, and to strive to earn and maintain the respect and trust of co-employees, customers and the wider community; to use Incitec Pivot’s resources, including information systems, in an appropriate and responsible way; and to work safely and with due regard for the safety and well-being of fellow employees, contractors, customers and all persons affected by Incitec Pivot’s operations or products; to avoid situations which involve or may involve a conflict between their personal interests and the interests of Incitec Pivot; to have due regard for cultural diversity in the workplace; and to respect the environment and ensure that work activities are managed in an acceptable manner so as to give benefit to society. • Incitec Pivot’s Code of Conduct for Directors and Senior Management, which sets out additional ethical standards for directors and senior management reporting to the Managing Director & CEO. • Incitec Pivot’s Health, Safety, Environment & Community Policy, which sets out the Company’s commitment to the Company’s values of “Zero Harm for Everyone, Everywhere” and “Care for the Community and our Environment”. The Policy provides that the Company will establish and maintain health and safety management standards and systems in compliance with relevant industry standards and regulatory requirements, and that the Company will provide a safe and healthy working environment. The Policy also provides for the Company to conduct its operations in compliance with all relevant environmental licences and regulations, and to strive to be a valued corporate citizen in the communities in which it operates. Whistleblower protection Employees are encouraged to raise any concerns, including those arising out of activities or behaviour that may not be in accordance with Incitec Pivot’s codes of conduct, any of its other policies, or any other regulatory requirements with management, the human resources team or the legal and compliance team. Employees can also raise concerns about breaches of the Company’s regulatory obligations or internal policies or procedures on an anonymous basis through its whistleblower reporting system. The Group Whistleblower Protection Policy protects employees who raise concerns about suspected breaches of Incitec Pivot’s policies. Incitec Pivot’s whistleblower reporting system meets all relevant Australian legislative requirements, and Australian Standard AS8004 (Whistleblower Protection Programs for Entities). Reports on the operation of the system are made to the Audit and Risk Management Committee. Share ownership and dealing The Board has adopted a Share Trading Policy which regulates dealings in the Company’s shares. The policy aims to ensure that Incitec Pivot’s directors, employees, advisors, auditors and consultants (staff) are aware of the legal restrictions on trading in securities while a person is in possession of inside information. Under the policy, all staff are prohibited from trading in the Company’s shares while in possession of inside information. Also, there are certain “black out” periods, from the end of the financial year or half year until two business days after the relevant financial results are announced, where trading is prohibited. In addition, certain members of staff (for example, directors, the direct reports to the Managing Director & CEO, and those in the finance units) are “designated employees” and as such may not deal in shares in the Company outside of “black out” periods unless, prior to the dealing, the relevant person has notified the Company Secretary and given written confirmation that they are not in possession of price sensitive information. Additionally, “designated employees” must not enter into hedging arrangements which operate to limit the economic risk of their security holding in Incitec Pivot. In the case of the Company Secretary, she must notify the Chairman or Managing Director & CEO of the proposed share trading and must also give the same written confirmation as a “designated employee” to the effect that she is not in possession of price sensitive information. All directors have entered into agreements with Incitec Pivot under which they agree to provide details of changes in their notifiable interests in Incitec Pivot’s shares within three business days after the date of change, enabling the ASX to be notified of any share dealings by a director within five business days of the dealing taking place, as required by the ASX Listing Rules. The Company’s Share Trading Policy is available on the corporate governance section of Incitec Pivot’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. The ASX has announced that the requirement to have a share trading policy will be elevated to a requirement under the ASX Listing Rules. The Company’s Share Trading Policy is in compliance with the requirements under the relevant new ASX Listing Rules. Details of shares in the Company held by the directors are set out in Note 35, Key Management Personnel disclosures. Diversity In compliance with the Revised Recommendations, the Charter for the Remunerations and Appointments Committee provides that the Committee must regularly review and report to the Board about the proportion of women at all levels of the Company. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 35 Directors’ Report Corporate Governance Statement Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting Audit and Risk Management Committee The Audit and Risk Management Committee has a Charter approved by the Board. The Committee assists the Board in its review of financial reporting principles and policies, controls and procedures, internal control and risk management and internal audit. It also assists the Board in its review of the integrity and reliability of the Company’s financial statements, the external audit and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The current members of the Audit and Risk Management Committee are Anthony Larkin (Chairman), John Marlay and Graham Smorgon, all of whom are independent non- executive directors. The qualifications of those directors appointed to the Audit and Risk Management Committee are set out on pages 8 and 9 of this Annual Report. The Committee meets as frequently as required but not less than four times a year. The Committee reviews its performance by self-assessment at least annually. The attendance of the members of the Audit and Risk Management Committee at each meeting held during the financial year to 30 September 2010 is set out on page 10 of this Annual Report. The internal and external auditors, the Managing Director & CEO and the Chief Financial Officer are invited to attend Audit and Risk Management Committee meetings. The Committee regularly meets with the internal and external auditors without management being present. The primary objectives of the Audit and Risk Management Committee, as set out in its Charter, are as follows: Financial reporting • review of reports and analyses – review management, internal audit and external audit reports and analyses of financial reporting issues; • review of financial statements – review all audited financial statements and all other financial information prior to release through the ASX to shareholders and the financial community; • accounting policies – review the critical accounting policies with external auditors and management; and • Managing Director & CEO and Chief Financial Officer certification – review the certification provided by the Managing Director & CEO and the Chief Financial Officer on annual and half-yearly reports. Internal control and risk management • risk management strategies – receive reports from management, internal auditor and external auditor concerning our risk management principles and policies, strategies, processes and controls and concerning the processes for determining and monitoring material business risks; • risk reports and monitoring – receive reports from management on risk implications from new and emerging risks, changes in the economic and business environment and other factors relevant to the Group’s performance and strategy; receive reports from management and monitor resolution of significant risk exposures; • compliance – receive reports from management, monitor and oversee compliance with applicable laws relating to the operation of the business and review and monitor policies and systems to manage compliance risk; • disclosure – review the form of disclosure to be made in the Annual Report given by the Managing Director & CEO and Chief Financial Officer as to the effectiveness of the Company’s management of material business risks; and insurance – receive reports from management and monitor the insurance strategy of the Group and recommend approval or variation of insurance policies. • External audit • appointment/replacement – manage the relationship between the Company and the external auditor including making recommendations to the Board on the selection, evaluation and replacement of the external auditor; • terms of engagement – determine the terms of engagement and remuneration of the external auditor and make recommendations to the Board; • effectiveness and independence – monitor the effectiveness and independence of the external auditor, including requiring the external auditor to prepare and deliver an annual statement as to its independence; • scope of audit – review the scope of the external audit with the external auditor; and • non-audit services – review and assess the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor, provide pre- approval or otherwise of all non-audit services which may be provided by the external auditor and ensure disclosure to shareholders of the Committee’s approval of non-audit work. Internal audit • appointment/replacement – evaluate the expertise and experience of potential internal auditors and make recommendations to the Board on the selection, evaluation and replacement of the internal auditor; • terms of engagement – determine the terms of engagement and remuneration of the internal auditor and make recommendations to the Board; • scope of audit and plan – review and assess the scope • of the audit and the internal audit plan; internal audit findings – receive summaries of significant reports to management from the internal auditor, management’s response and the internal auditor’s recommendations; • monitor internal audit plan – monitor, and review compliance with, and the effectiveness of implementation of, audit plans of the internal auditor; and • assessment – conduct an annual assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls and financial reporting procedures. External auditor The role of the external auditor is to provide an independent opinion that the Company’s financial reports are true and fair and comply with the applicable regulations. KPMG is the Company’s external auditor. 36 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 The lead audit partner and review partner of the Company’s external auditor rotate every five years. The current lead audit partner and review partner were appointed for the 2006/07 audit of the Company, replacing the lead audit partner and review partner previously appointed for the audits from 2002/03. Restrictions are placed on non-audit work performed by the auditor and projects outside the scope of the audit require the approval of the Audit and Risk Management Committee. Further details are set out in Note 7 to the financial statements, Auditor’s remuneration. Since KPMG’s appointment in 2003, KPMG’s lead audit partner and other representatives from KPMG have attended the Company’s annual general meetings and were available to answer questions from shareholders, as appropriate. For the next Annual General Meeting to be held on 21 December 2010, the lead audit partner or appropriate alternates will attend. Shareholders have the right under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to submit written questions on certain topics to the auditor and the auditor may table answers to such questions at the Annual General Meeting. Internal auditor Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu is the Company’s internal auditor, undertaking internal audits to an annual plan approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee. Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure The Company is subject to continuous disclosure obligations under the ASX Listing Rules and Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Subject to some limited exceptions, under the continuous disclosure requirements, the Company must immediately notify the market, through ASX, of any information which a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of the Company’s shares. To achieve these objectives and satisfy the regulatory requirements, the Board has implemented a Continuous Disclosure Policy. The Policy aims to ensure the proper and timely disclosure of information to shareholders and the market in several ways, including: • in annual reports and financial statements, releases of results to ASX each half and full year, and at the Company’s Annual General Meeting; • releasing price sensitive announcements and other relevant significant announcements directly to the market via ASX; • conducting briefings with analysts and institutions from time to time – in doing so, Incitec Pivot recognises the importance of ensuring that any price sensitive information provided during these briefings is made available to all shareholders and the market at the same time and in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ASX and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; and • providing information on the Company’s website, which contains information about the Company and its activities, including statutory reports and investor information. The Policy appoints the Company Secretary as the Continuous Disclosure Officer whose role includes providing announcements to the ASX and ensuring senior management and employees are kept informed of the Company’s obligations and the accountability of the Company and its directors, officers and employees for compliance with the disclosure rules. The Company’s Continuous Disclosure Policy is available on the corporate governance section of Incitec Pivot’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. Principle 6: Respect the rights of shareholders Incitec Pivot is committed to giving all shareholders comprehensive, timely and equal access to information about its activities so as to enable shareholders to make informed investment decisions and effectively exercise their rights as shareholders. To achieve these objectives, the Board adopted a revised Shareholder Communications Policy in November 2009. The Policy aims to ensure: • that the Company’s announcements are presented in a factual, clear and balanced way; • that all shareholders have equal and timely access to material information concerning the Company; and • shareholder access to information about, and shareholder participation in, general meetings of the Company. The Company regularly reviews the methods by which it communicates with shareholders so as to ensure it can make best use of new technologies to enhance shareholder communication. The Company places all relevant announcements made to the market, and related information, on the Company’s website after they have been released to the ASX. The Shareholder Communications Policy is available on the corporate governance section of Incitec Pivot’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk Risk oversight and management Risk is present in all aspects of Incitec Pivot’s business. It has the potential to impact people, the environment, the community and the reputation, assets and financial performance of the Group. Incitec Pivot is committed to the effective management of risk, which is central to its continued growth and success and the achievement of the Group’s corporate objective and strategy. Incitec Pivot has adopted a Group Risk Policy for the oversight and management of material business risks and manages risk within a comprehensive risk management process which is consistent with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for Risk Management (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009). A key element of this risk management process is the Board’s assessment on risk, which is based on the level of risk Incitec Pivot is able to sustain in achieving its corporate objective of delivering value to shareholders. Risks are identified, analysed and prioritised using common methodologies and risk controls are designed and implemented having regard to the overall corporate strategy. The risk controls adopted by Incitec Pivot are administered via a Group-wide framework, and include: • identifying, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and reporting on material business risks to the Audit and Risk Management Committee; Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 37 Directors’ Report Corporate Governance Statement • the internal audit function; • annual budgeting and monthly reporting systems to monitor performance; • delegations of authority; • guidelines for the authorisation of capital expenditure; • a compliance program supported by approved guidelines and standards covering health, safety and environment, and regulatory compliance; • policies and procedures for the management of financial risk and treasury operations, including exposures to foreign currencies and movements in interest rates; • a letter of assurance process to provide assurance from management that all controls are in place and operating appropriately; and • business continuity plans. A summary of the Group Risk Policy is available on the corporate governance section of Incitec Pivot’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. Risk management roles and responsibilities The Board is responsible for reviewing and approving the overall management of risk and internal control. The Board monitors the Group’s risk profile, risks and mitigating strategies primarily through the Audit and Risk Management Committee. The Audit and Risk Management Committee’s duties with respect to internal control and risk management have been summarised under the discussion of Principle 4 on page 36 of this Annual Report. The Audit and Risk Management Committee and, through it, the Board, receive regular reports from management on the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management process. Incitec Pivot has identified the following material business risks, which it has categorised under its Risk Management Framework as follows: General Economic and Business Conditions The current global economic business climate and any sustained downturn in the global, North American or Australian economy may adversely impact Incitec Pivot’s overall performance. This may affect, among other things, profitability and demand for fertilisers, industrial chemicals, industrial explosives, and related products and services. Product price deteriorations could adversely affect Incitec Pivot’s business and financial performance: • Fertilisers are internationally traded commodities with pricing based on international benchmarks and are affected by global supply and demand forces, as well as fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the exchange rate between the Australian dollar and the US dollar. Industrial explosives products, particularly ammonium nitrate based explosives, are affected more directly by supply and demand dynamics in industrial explosives markets, such as quarrying, construction and mining. • The appreciation or depreciation of the Australian dollar against the US dollar may materially affect Incitec Pivot’s financial performance. A large proportion of Incitec Pivot’s sales are denominated either directly or indirectly in foreign currencies, primarily the US dollar. In addition, Incitec Pivot also borrows funds in US dollars, and the Australian dollar equivalent of these borrowings will fluctuate with the exchange rate. Operational Risks Incitec Pivot operates manufacturing plants and facilities and is exposed to operational risks associated with the manufacture, distribution and storage of fertilisers, ammonium nitrate and industrial chemicals and industrial explosives products and services. These risks include the need for plant reliability and timely and economic supply of adequate raw materials, such as natural gas, ammonia, phosphate rock, sulphur and sulphuric acid. Incitec Pivot’s manufacturing and distribution systems are vulnerable to unforeseen human error, equipment breakdowns, energy or water disruptions, natural disasters and acts of God, sabotage, terrorist attacks, and other events which may disrupt Incitec Pivot’s operations and materially affect its financial performance. In addition, loss from such events may not be recoverable in whole or in part under Incitec Pivot’s insurance policies. A shortage of skilled labour or loss of key personnel could disrupt Incitec Pivot’s business operations or adversely affect Incitec Pivot’s business and financial performance. Incitec Pivot’s manufacturing plants require skilled operators drawn from a range of disciplines, trades and vocations. In addition, the loss of services of one or more of Incitec Pivot’s senior management could impede execution of Incitec Pivot’s business strategy and result in reduced profitability. In regard to the Fertilisers business, seasonal conditions, particularly rainfall, is a key factor for determining the timing and production of crops, which drives fertiliser demand and sales. Any prolonged adverse weather conditions could impact future profitability and prospects of Incitec Pivot. Strategy and Planning Incitec Pivot operates in a competitive environment. The domestic and international fertiliser and industrial explosives industries are highly competitive. The actions of competitors of Incitec Pivot or the entry of new competitors may result in loss of sales and market share which could adversely affect Incitec Pivot’s financial performance. Health, Safety and Environment Incitec Pivot is subject to various operational hazards, including from the manufacture, processing and transportation of its fertiliser and explosives products and in the provision of its related services, which could potentially result in injury or incident to employees, contractors, the public or the environment. Incitec Pivot has adopted a “Zero Harm” policy to manage its health and safety risks. Compliance and Regulatory Risks Changes in federal or state government legislation, regulations or policies in any of the countries in which it operates may adversely impact on Incitec Pivot’s business, financial condition and results of operations. For instance, Incitec Pivot, as a significant manufacturer, may be affected by the impact of future carbon trading or carbon tax regimes, or future regulation of carbon emissions, together with any legislative requirements relating to climate change or associated issues. Incitec Pivot’s business is subject to environmental laws and regulations that require specific operating licences and impose various requirements and standards. Changes in these laws and regulations, or changes to licence conditions may have a detrimental effect on Incitec Pivot’s operations 38 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 and financial performance, including the need to undertake environmental remediation. executive directors, being John Marlay (Chair), John Watson and Allan McCallum. Incitec Pivot is exposed to potential legal and other claims or disputes in the course of its business, including contractual disputes, property damage and personal liability claims in connection with operational and health and safety matters. Risk management and internal controls Management, through the Managing Director & CEO and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for the overall design, implementation, management and coordination of the Group’s risk management and internal control system. Each business unit has responsibility for identification and management of risks specific to their business. This is managed through an annual risk workshop within each business unit. The risk workshops are facilitated by the Group’s internal auditors, and form part of the annual internal audit program, thereby aligning the internal audit activities with material business risks. The outcomes of the business unit risk workshops are assessed as part of the annual corporate risk workshop. The resultant Corporate Risk Workbook is presented to the Audit and Risk Management Committee on an annual basis, and management is required to present regular updates to the Committee on material business risks. Internal audit independently monitors the internal control framework and provides regular reports to the Audit and Risk Management Committee. The annual internal audit program is approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee. Internal audit provides written reports to the Committee on the effectiveness of the management of risk and internal controls, and meets regularly with the Committee without the presence of management. The Audit and Risk Management Committee and the Board have received reports from management on the effectiveness of the Group’s management of its material business risks for the financial year ended 30 September 2010. CEO and CFO Declaration and Assurance In accordance with the ASX Recommendations, for the financial year ended 30 September 2010, the Board received written assurance from the Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that the declaration provided by them in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control, and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to the reporting of financial risks. Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly The Board and Remuneration and Appointments Committee are primarily responsible in relation to the oversight of the Company’s remuneration framework and policies. Details of Incitec Pivot’s remuneration arrangements are set out in the Remuneration Report. As set out on page 34 of this Annual Report, the Remuneration and Appointments Committee is formed under a Charter approved by the Board, a copy of which is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s website, www.incitecpivot.com.au. The members of the Committee are three independent non- The Revised Recommendations provide that a remuneration committee should be structured so that it consists of a majority of independent directors, is chaired by an independent director and has at least three members. The Charter for the Remuneration and Appointments Committee provides that each member of the Committee must be a non-executive director and a majority of members of the Committee must be independent. The Charter also provides that the Chairman of the Committee must be an independent director. As each member of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee (including Mr John Marlay, the Chairman of the Committee) is considered to be an independent non-executive director, the structure of the Committee fulfils the requirements under the Revised Recommendations. Incitec Pivot’s policy is to remunerate non-executive directors by way of fees and payments which may be in the form of cash, non-cash benefits and superannuation benefits. Incitec Pivot’s broad policy in relation to the level of non-executive directors’ fees and payments is to ensure that these fees and payments are consistent with the market and enable Incitec Pivot to attract and retain directors of an appropriate calibre. Details of these fees and payments are included in the table titled “Non-executive directors’ remuneration” set out in section B of the Remuneration Report on page 16. The Company’s policy is that non-executive directors should not be remunerated by way of options, shares, performance rights, bonuses nor incentive-based payments. Under the Company’s Constitution, the maximum remuneration payable by the Company for the services of non-executive directors in total must not exceed the amount approved by shareholders in general meeting, which is $2,000,000 as approved at the Annual General Meeting held on 19 December 2008. The total remuneration paid to the non-executive directors during the financial year ended 30 September 2010 was within the maximum amount approved by shareholders. Details of remuneration paid to the Managing Director & CEO and other executives are included in table C.3 “Executive remuneration” in the Remuneration Report on page 26. The attendance of the members of the Remuneration and Appointments Committee at each meeting held during the financial year to 30 September 2010 is set out on page 10 of this Annual Report. Signed on behalf of the Board. John C Watson, AM Chairman Dated at Melbourne this 12th day of November 2010 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 39 40 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Financial Report Income Statement ................................................ 42 Statement of Comprehensive Income ................ 43 Statement of Financial Position .......................... 44 Statement of Cash Flows ..................................... 45 Statement of Changes in Equity .......................... 46 Notes to the Financial Statements ..................... 47 Directors’ Declaration on the Financial Statements set out on pages 42 to 111 ........... 112 Audit Report ....................................................... 113 Shareholder Statistics ......................................... 115 Five Year Financial Statistics .............................. 116 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 41 Income Statement For the year ended 30 September 2010 Revenue Other and financial income Operating expenses Changes in inventories of finished goods and work in progress Raw materials and consumables used and finished goods purchased for resale Employee expenses Depreciation and amortisation expense Financial expenses Purchased services Repairs and maintenance Outgoing freight Lease payments - operating leases Profit on share equity accounted investments Asset write-downs, clean-up and environmental provisions Other expenses Profit / (loss) before income tax (Income tax expense) / Income tax benefit Profit / (loss) for the financial year Profit / (loss) attributable to: Shareholders of Incitec Pivot Limited Minority interest Earnings per share Basic earnings / (loss) per share Diluted earnings / (loss) per share Consolidated 2010 2009 Restated* Notes $mill $mill (4) (4) 2,931.7 53.7 3,418.9 47.4 (69.3) (231.9) (5) (5) (5) (16) (8) (1,141.9) (516.5) (139.0) (58.3) (144.0) (110.0) (166.5) (55.0) 30.5 (28.3) (47.2) (2,445.5) 539.9 (127.7) 412.2 (1,545.1) (548.6) (170.5) (126.1) (188.9) (122.3) (173.6) (52.5) 25.0 (590.1) (56.3) (3,780.9) (314.6) 93.2 (221.4) 410.5 1.7 (221.4) - cents cents (9) (9) 25.3 25.3 (14.4) (14.4) *Comparative information has been restated to reflect the correction to the Income tax benefit as described in Note 1 (xxvii) to the Financial Statements. The above Income Statement is to be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Financial Statements set out on pages 47 to 111. 42 42 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Statement of Comprehensive Income For the year ended 30 September 2010 Profit / (loss) for the financial year Other comprehensive income / (expense) Cash flow hedging reserve Changes in fair value of cash-flow hedges Profit in cash-flow hedges transferred to Income Statement Income tax on movements in the cash-flow hedging reserve Fair value reserve Change in fair value of assets held as available for sale Income tax on change in fair value of assets held as available for sale Foreign currency translation reserve Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Net gain on hedge of net investment Income tax on net gain on hedge of net investment Notes Actuarial losses on defined benefit plans Actuarial losses on defined benefit plans Income tax on actuarial losses on defined benefit plans (25) Total other comprehensive (expense) Total comprehensive income / (expense) for the financial year Total comprehensive income / (expense) attributable to: Shareholders of Incitec Pivot Limited Minority interest 2010 Consolidated 2009 Restated* $mill $mill 412.2 (221.4) 45.6 3.1 (17.9) 30.8 (18.5) 5.5 (13.0) (183.7) 67.7 (20.1) (136.1) (16.9) 6.4 (10.5) (15.9) 2.2 4.4 (9.3) 14.2 (4.2) 10.0 (257.3) - - (257.3) (33.3) 12.7 (20.6) (128.8) (277.2) 283.4 (498.6) 281.7 1.7 (498.6) - *Comparative information has been restated to reflect the correction to the Income tax benefit as described in Note 1 (xxvii) to the Financial Statements. The above Statement of Comprehensive Income is to be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Financial Statements set out on pages 47 to 111. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 43 43 Statement of Financial Position As at 30 September 2010 Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories Other assets Other financial assets Assets classified as held for sale Current tax assets Total current assets Non-current assets Trade and other receivables Other assets Other financial assets Investments accounted for using the equity method Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets Deferred tax assets Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Other financial liabilities Provisions Current tax liabilities Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Provisions Deferred tax liabilities Retirement benefit obligations Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Issued capital Reserves Retained earnings Minority interest Total equity Notes (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (11) (13) (14) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (20) (21) (23) (24) (25) (26) Consolidated 2010 $mill 48.7 443.8 336.5 36.2 111.6 9.1 - 985.9 15.3 2.5 28.7 256.5 1,844.1 3,002.6 173.9 5,323.6 6,309.5 697.1 108.5 1.7 82.2 25.1 914.6 378.3 1,037.3 82.6 190.1 95.3 1,783.6 2,698.2 3,611.3 3,265.9 7.0 336.3 2.1 3,611.3 Restated* 2009 $mill 125.2 323.0 397.1 30.7 71.2 54.3 32.4 1,033.9 32.1 4.7 135.9 254.0 1,663.4 3,153.0 312.7 5,555.8 6,589.7 636.7 432.2 12.9 93.4 - 1,175.2 426.6 1,156.4 87.5 312.8 91.6 2,074.9 3,250.1 3,339.6 3,217.8 119.1 2.7 - 3,339.6 *Comparative information has been restated to reflect a correction to deferred tax assets as described in Note 1 (xxvii) to the Financial Statements. The above Statement of Financial Position is to be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Financial Statements set out on pages 47 to 111. 44 44 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Statement of Cash Flows For the year ended 30 September 2010 Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers Payments to suppliers and employees Interest received Financial expenses paid Other revenue received Income taxes paid Net cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Payments for property, plant and equipment and intangibles Payments for purchase of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired Payments for purchase of investments Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment Net cash flows from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Repayments of borrowings Proceeds from borrowings Payment of borrowing costs Proceeds from shares issued Realised market value gains on cross currency swaps Share issuance cost paid Dividends paid Net cash flows from financing activities Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents held Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year Effect of exchange rate fluctuation on cash and cash equivalents held Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year Notes Consolidated 2009 $mill Inflows/ (Outflows) 2010 $mill Inflows/ (Outflows) 3,145.3 (2,599.2) 4.9 (43.6) 31.8 (10.3) 528.9 3,878.5 (3,330.6) 23.6 (115.8) 28.0 (146.3) 337.4 (316.3) (97.1) (6.6) 19.0 (401.0) (393.0) 1.0 (3.0) 52.5 (342.5) (1,380.4) 1,003.5 (8.3) - 201.3 - (18.3) (202.2) (74.3) 125.2 (2.2) 48.7 (4,232.4) 2,972.6 (18.3) 901.7 306.3 (37.8) (237.4) (345.3) (350.4) 479.7 (4.1) 125.2 (29) (28) (10) The above Statement of Cash Flows is to be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Financial Statements set out on pages 47 to 111. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 45 45 Statement of Changes in Equity For the year ended 30 September 2010 Consolidated Balance at 1 October 2008 Total comprehensive income for the period Dividends paid Shares issued during the period Transaction cost on issuing shares Share based payment transactions Dividends received as loan repayment Option expense Deferred tax on share based payments Loan repayments Employee shareholder loans Balance at 30 September 2009 Balance at 1 October 2009 Sale of share capital to minority interest holder Total comprehensive income for the period Dividends paid Shares issued during the period Share based payment transactions Dividends received as loan repayment Option expense Deferred tax on share based payments Loan repayments Balance at 30 September 2010 Issued capital $mill 2,267.7 - - 987.9 (37.8) - - - - - 3,217.8 3,217.8 - - - 48.1 - - - - 3,265.9 Cash flow hedging reserve Share based payments reserve Foreign currency translation reserve Fair value reserve Retained earnings $mill $mill $mill $mill $mill Minority interest Restated* total equity $mill $mill Total $mill (1.3) (9.3) - - - - - - - - (10.6) (10.6) - 30.8 - - - - - - 20.2 (10.8) - - - - 1.8 2.2 0.3 2.9 (3.4) (7.0) (7.0) - - - - 0.1 3.8 0.6 1.7 (0.8) 371.2 (257.3) - - - - - - - - 113.9 113.9 - (136.1) - - - - - - (22.2) 12.8 10.0 - - - - - - - - 22.8 22.8 - (13.0) - - - - - - 9.8 515.7 (242.0) (271.0) - - - - - - - 2.7 2.7 - 400.0 (66.4) - - - - - 336.3 3,155.3 (498.6) (271.0) 987.9 (37.8) 1.8 2.2 0.3 2.9 (3.4) 3,339.6 3,339.6 - 281.7 (66.4) 48.1 0.1 3.8 0.6 1.7 3,609.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.4 1.7 - - - - - - 2.1 3,155.3 (498.6) (271.0) 987.9 (37.8) 1.8 2.2 0.3 2.9 (3.4) 3,339.6 3,339.6 0.4 283.4 (66.4) 48.1 0.1 3.8 0.6 1.7 3,611.3 *Comparative information has been restated to reflect a correction to the Income tax benefit as described in Note 1 (xxvii) to the Financial Statements. The Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Financial Statements set out on pages 47 to 111. Cash flow hedging reserve The cash flow hedging reserve comprises the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments related to the effective portion of hedged transactions that have not yet occurred. Share-based payments reserve The share-based payments reserve comprises the amount receivable from employees in relation to limited recourse loans for shares issued under long term incentive plans, as well as the fair value of shares treated as options and of rights recognised as an employee expense over the relevant vesting period. Foreign currency translation reserve Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign controlled operations are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve, as described in Note 1(xix). The relevant position of the reserve is recognised in the Income Statement when the foreign operation is disposed of. It is also used to record gains and losses on hedges of net investments in foreign operations. Fair value reserve The fair value reserve represents the cumulative net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets until the investment is derecognised as available-for-sale. Minority interest During the year, the Group sold a 35% interest in Quantum Fertilisers Limited, a Hong Kong based Fertiliser trading company. 46 46 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Significant accounting policies Critical accounting estimates and judgements Segment report Revenue and other income Expenses Individually material items Auditor’s remuneration Income tax expense Earnings per share (EPS) 10 Cash and cash equivalents 11 Trade and other receivables 12 Inventories 13 Other assets 14 Other financial assets 15 Assets classified as held for sale 16 Investments accounted for using the equity method 17 Property, plant and equipment 18 Intangible assets 19 Deferred tax assets 20 Trade and other payables 21 Interest bearing liabilities 22 Other financial liabilities 23 Provisions 24 Deferred tax liabilities 25 Retirement benefit obligations 26 Issued capital 27 Dividends 28 Business combination 29 Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash inflow from operating activities 30 Commitments 31 Contingent liabilities 32 Financial risk management 33 Financial instruments 34 Related party disclosures 35 Key management personnel disclosures 36 Share based payments 37 Investments in controlled entities 38 Deed of cross guarantee 39 Parent entity disclosure 40 Events subsequent to balance date 48 55 56 59 59 60 61 62 63 63 64 64 64 64 65 65 68 69 71 72 73 74 74 77 78 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 92 96 97 102 107 109 110 111 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 47 47 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies Incitec Pivot Limited (‘the Company’ or ‘Incitec Pivot’) is a company domiciled in Australia. The consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 12 November 2010. The significant accounting policies adopted in preparing the financial report of Incitec Pivot and of its controlled entities (collectively ‘the Group’) are stated below to assist in a general understanding of this financial report. Interests in jointly controlled entities and associates are equity accounted (recorded as Investments accounted for using the equity method) and do not form part of the Group (Refer Note 1 (ii) (b)). These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. (i) Basis of preparation The financial report is a general purpose financial report which has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AASBs) (including Australian Interpretations) adopted by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001. The consolidated financial report of the Group complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Compliance with IFRS The consolidated financial report of the Group complies with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Historical cost convention These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for derivative financial instruments, available-for-sale financial assets, financial instruments held for trading and liabilities for cash settled share based payment arrangements, all of which have been measured at fair value. The carrying values of recognised assets and liabilities that are hedged items in fair value hedges, and that would be otherwise carried at cost, are adjusted to record changes in the fair value attributable to the risks that are being hedged to match the fair value accounting applied to the derivative financial instruments used to hedge these items. The financial report is presented in Australian dollars. Critical accounting estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in Note 2. Early adoption of standards Incitec Pivot has elected to early adopt certain Australian Accounting Standards and interpretations which permit early adoption. The decision to early adopt those standards and interpretations ensures that policy elections described below, including IFRS transition exemptions, are available. The principal standards and interpretations that have been early adopted are: • AASB 2009-5 Further Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Process (AASB 5, 8, 118 and 136) (January 2011) • AASB 2009-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Classification of Rights Issues (February 2010) • AASB 2009-13 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Interpretation 19 AASB1 (July 2010) • AASB 2009-14 Amendments to Australian Interpretation – Prepayments of a Minimum Funding requirement (January 2011) • AASB 2010-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project (July 2010) • AASB 2010-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project (January 2011) • AASB Interpretation 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments (July 2010) The early adoption of AASB 2009-5 changed the segment information disclosures to reflect the results regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (Incitec Pivot’s Executive Team) of the Group. This has resulted in changes to the segment information as disclosed in Note 3. Other than the impact of AASB 2009-5, as described above, the early adoption of these standards did not have a significant impact on the Group’s results in the current and/or prior year. Issued Standards not early adopted The following standards and amendments were available for early adoption but have not been applied by the Group in these financial statements: • AASB 9 Financial Instruments includes requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets resulting from the first part of Phase 1 of the project to replace AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. AASB 9 will become mandatory for the Group’s 30 September 2014 financial statements. The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the standard. • AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures (revised December 2009) simplifies and clarifies the intended meaning of the definition of a related party. The amendments, which will become mandatory for the Group’s 30 September 2012 financial statements, are not expected to have an impact on the financial statements. • AASB 2009-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Group Cash-settled Share-based Payment Transactions resolves diversity in practice regarding the attribution of cash- settled share-based payments between different entities within a Group. The amendments, which become mandatory for the Group’s 30 September 2011 financial statements, are not expected to have a significant impact on the financial statements. (ii) Consolidation (a) Subsidiaries The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Incitec Pivot as at 30 September 2010 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group (refer to Note 1(xiv)). Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between consolidated companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the Statement of Financial Position of the Company (refer Note 39). 48 48 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) (ii) Consolidation (continued) (b) Associates and jointly controlled entities Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist when the Group holds between 20 and 50 percent of the voting power of another entity. Jointly controlled entities are those entities over whose activities the Group has joint control, established by contractual agreement and requiring unanimous consent for strategic financial and operating decisions. Associates and jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method (equity accounted investees) and are initially recognised at cost. The Group’s investment includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any accumulated impairment losses. The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of the income and expenses and equity movements of equity accounted investees, after adjustments to align the accounting policies with those of the Group, from the date that significant influence or joint control commences until the date that significant influence or joint control ceases. When the Group’s share of losses exceeds its interest in an equity accounted investee, the carrying amount of that interest (including any long-term investments) is reduced to nil and the recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Group has an obligation or has made payments on behalf of the investee. (iii) Revenue recognition Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of returns, trade allowances and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. Revenue is recognised for the major business activities as follows: Sales Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer. No revenue is recognised if there is significant uncertainty regarding recovery of the consideration due, where the costs incurred or to be incurred cannot be measured reliably, where there is a significant risk of return of goods or where there is continuing management involvement with the goods. Interest income is recognised as it accrues. Dividends receivable are recognised in the Income Statement when declared, or received, whichever occurs first. (iv) Borrowing costs Borrowing costs include interest on borrowings, amortisation of discounts or premiums relating to borrowings and amortisation of ancillary costs incurred in connection with the arrangement of borrowings, including lease finance charges. Borrowing costs are expensed as incurred unless they relate to qualifying assets. Qualifying assets are assets that take more than twelve months to get ready for their intended use or sale. Where funds are borrowed specifically for the production of a qualifying asset, the interest on those funds is capitalised, net of any interest earned on those borrowings. Where funds are borrowed generally, finance costs are capitalised using a weighted average interest rate for the purpose of capitalising interest. (v) Share based payments The grant date fair value of shares treated as options, and rights, granted to employees is recognised as an employee expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period that employees become unconditionally entitled to the options or rights. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of options, shares and rights for which the related service and non-market vesting conditions are met. The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of rights, which are settled in cash, is recognised as an expense, with a corresponding increase in liabilities, over the period that the employees become unconditionally entitled to payment. The liability is remeasured during each reporting period and at settlement date. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are recognised as employee expenses in the Income Statement. (vi) Taxation Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax and is recognised in the Income Statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the period, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous periods, adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, and by the availability of unused tax losses. Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method in which temporary differences are calculated based on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of goodwill; the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit; and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied when the temporary difference reverses, that is, when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the assets can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised. Current tax assets and liabilities are offset where the consolidated entity has a legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority. The assumptions regarding future realisation, and therefore the recognition of deferred tax assets, may change due to future operating performance and other factors. Incitec Pivot provides for income tax in both Australia and overseas jurisdictions where a liability exists. Tax Consolidation The Company and its wholly-owned Australian resident entities have formed a tax-consolidated group and are therefore taxed as a single entity. The head entity within the tax-consolidated group is Incitec Pivot. Members of the tax consolidated group recognise their own current tax expense/income and deferred tax assets and liabilities arising from temporary differences using the ‘stand alone taxpayer’ approach by reference to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the separate financial statements of each entity and the tax values applying under tax consolidation. In addition to its current and deferred tax balances, the Company also recognises the current tax liabilities (or assets), and the deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from members of the tax-consolidated group, as part of the tax-consolidation arrangement. Assets or liabilities arising under tax funding agreements with members of the tax-consolidated group are recognised as amounts receivable or payable from the other entities within the tax-consolidated group. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 49 49 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) (vi) Taxation (continued) Nature of tax funding agreement Incitec Pivot, as the head entity of the tax-consolidated group, in conjunction with the other members of the tax-consolidated group, has entered into a tax funding agreement which sets out the funding obligations of members of the tax-consolidated group in respect of tax amounts. The tax funding agreement requires payment to/from the head entity equal to the current tax liability/asset assumed by the head entity, resulting in the head entity recognising an intercompany receivable/payable equal to the amount of the tax liability/asset assumed. The agreement requires wholly-owned subsidiaries to make contributions to the Company for tax liabilities arising from external transactions during the year. The contributions are calculated as if each subsidiary continued to be a stand alone taxpayer in its own right. The contributions are payable annually and reflect the timing of the head entity’s obligation to make payments for tax liabilities to the relevant tax authority. There is no adjustment for tax consolidation contribution by (or distribution to) equity participants. (vii) Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated cost of completion and selling expenses. Cost is based on a weighted average method. For manufactured goods, cost includes direct material and labour costs plus an appropriate proportion of fixed and variable overheads based on normal operating capacity of the production facilities. For third- party sourced finished goods, cost is net cost into store. Engineering spares are held in inventory and expensed when used. (viii) Trade and other receivables Trade and other receivables are recognised at their cost less any impairment losses. Collectability of trade and other receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectable are written off by reducing the carrying amount directly. An allowance account (provision for impairment of trade receivables) is used when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables. The amount of the impairment allowance is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. Cash flows relating to short-term receivables are not discounted if the effect of discounting is immaterial. The amount of the impairment loss is recognised in the Income Statement within other expenses. When a trade receivable for which an impairment allowance had been recognised becomes uncollectable in a subsequent period, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against other expenses in the Income Statement. Where substantially all risks and rewards relating to receivables have been transferred to a financial institution, the receivable is derecognised. Where this has not occurred, the receivable and the equivalent interest bearing liability have been recognised in the statement of financial position. (ix) Other financial assets The Group’s interests in financial assets included in Note 14, other than controlled entities and financial assets classified as available- for-sale, are stated at fair value, with movement in market value recognised in the Income Statement. Financial assets classified as being available-for-sale are stated at fair value with movements in market value recognised within a fair value reserve. The fair value of available-for-sale financial assets is determined by reference to their quoted bid price at the reporting date. Purchases and sales are recognised on trade date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell assets. Investment income includes dividends, which are recognised in the Income Statement when received or a legal right to receive is established. (x) Assets (or disposal groups) held for sale Immediately before classification as held for sale, the measurement of the assets (and all assets and liabilities in a disposal group) is reviewed in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Then, on initial classification as held for sale, non-current assets (or disposal groups) are recognised at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses are recognised for any initial or subsequent write- down of the asset (or disposal group) to fair value less costs to sell. A gain is recognised for any subsequent increases in fair value less costs to sell off an asset (or disposal group), but not in excess of any cumulative impairment loss previously recognised. A gain or loss not previously recognised by the date of the sale of the non-current asset (or disposal group) is recognised at the date of derecognition. Non-current assets classified as held for sale and the assets of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented separately in the Statement of Financial Position. (xi) Property, plant and equipment and depreciation Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost or deemed cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the item. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Property, plant and equipment, other than freehold land, is depreciated on a straight-line basis at rates calculated to allocate the cost less the estimated residual value over the estimated useful life of each asset to the Group. Estimated useful lives of each class of asset are as follows: 20 to 40 years 3 to 30 years • Buildings and improvements • Machinery, plant and equipment The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. Certain items of property, plant and equipment that had been revalued to fair value on or prior to 1 October 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, are measured on the basis of deemed cost, being the revalued amount at the date of that revaluation. Profits and losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment are taken to the Income Statement. Spare parts purchased for a particular asset or class of assets are classified as capital spares in property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the useful life of the asset or class of assets to which they relate. (xii) Leased assets Leases under which the Group assumes substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as finance leases. Other leases are classified as operating leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the present value of the minimum lease payments and amortised on a straight-line basis over the period during which benefits are expected to flow from the use of the leased assets. A corresponding liability is established and each lease payment is allocated between finance charges and reduction of the liability. Operating leases are not capitalised and lease rental payments are recognised in the Income Statement on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. 50 50 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) (xiii) Intangible assets (a) Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortised. Instead, goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, and is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. (b) Research and development Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding, is recognised in the Income Statement as an expense as incurred. Expenditure on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is capitalised if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Group intends to complete development. The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development expenditure is recognised in the Income Statement as an expense as incurred. Capitalised development expenditure is stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. (c) Other intangible assets Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Group are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. (d) Subsequent expenditure Subsequent expenditure on capitalised intangible assets is capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. All other such expenditure is expensed as incurred. (e) Amortisation Amortisation is charged to the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets, unless such lives are indefinite. Goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are systematically tested for impairment at each annual balance sheet date. Other intangible assets are amortised from the date that they are available for use or when received. The estimated useful lives in the current and comparative periods are as follows: • Software • Product trademarks • Patents • Customer contracts 3 – 7 years 4 – 10 years 13 – 15 years 10 – 17 years (xiv) Business combinations The purchase method of accounting is used to account for all business combinations, including business combinations involving entities or businesses under common control, regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets are acquired. Cost is measured as the fair value of the assets given, shares issued or liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange. For acquisitions occurring in stages, goodwill is determined at the acquisition date. Goodwill is determined after the previously held equity interest is adjusted to fair value. Where equity instruments are issued in an acquisition, the fair value of the instruments is their published market price as at the date of exchange unless, in rare circumstances, it can be demonstrated that the published price at the date of exchange is an unreliable indicator of fair value and that other evidence and valuation methods provide a more reliable measure of fair value. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill (refer to Note 1(xiii) (a)). If the cost of acquisition is less than the Group’s share of the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the Income Statement, but only after a reassessment of the identification and measurement of the net assets acquired. Where settlement of any part of cash consideration is deferred, the amounts payable in the future are discounted to their present value as at the date of exchange. The discount rate used is the entity’s incremental borrowing rate, being the rate at which a similar borrowing could be obtained from an independent financier under comparable terms and conditions. When control is obtained in successive share purchases, each significant transaction is accounted for separately and the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired are stated at fair value when control is obtained. (xv) Segment Reporting As of 1 October 2009, the Group has determined and presented operating segments based on the information that is internally provided to the Group’s Executive Team, which is the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker. This change in accounting policy is due to the adoption of AASB 8 Operating Segments. Previously, operating segments were determined and presented in accordance with AASB 114 Segment Reporting. Comparative segment information has been re-presented in conformity with the transitional requirements of AASB 8. Since the change in accounting policy only impacts presentation and disclosure aspects, there is no impact on earnings per share. An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Group’s other components. All operating segments’ operating results are regularly reviewed by the Group’s Executive Team to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the operating segment and assess their performance. Operating segment results that are reported to the Executive Team include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis. Unallocated items comprise mainly corporate assets and head office expenses. Operating segment capital expenditure is the total cost incurred during the period to acquire property, plant and equipment and software. The following disclosure changes were made to the balance sheet, reportable segments and segment information: • In the prior year, the Group comprised two main business segments; Fertilisers and Explosives. Given the adoption of AASB 8 and a change in reporting structure, the Group has identified four reportable segments: Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, Southern Cross International, Dyno Nobel – Americas and Dyno Nobel – Asia Pacific. • The Group is required to disclose information as it is provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker. As such, no information regarding segment assets and liabilities has been disclosed. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 51 51 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) (c) Employee entitlements (xvi) Interest-bearing borrowings Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised initially at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, interest-bearing borrowings are stated at amortised cost with any difference between cost and redemption value being recognised in the Income Statement over the period of the borrowings on an effective interest basis. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs, and any discount or premium on issuance. Gains and losses are recognised in the Income Statement in the event that the liabilities are derecognised. (xvii) Provisions A provision is recognised when there is a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that a future sacrifice of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date. The discount rate used to determine the present value reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised in borrowing costs. (a) Environmental Estimated costs relating to the remediation of soil, groundwater and untreated waste that have arisen as a result of past events are usually taken to the Income Statement as soon as the need is identified and a reliable estimate of the liability is able to be assessed. However, where the cost relates to land held for resale then, to the extent that the expected realisation exceeds both the book value of the land and the estimated cost of remediation, the cost is capitalised as part of the holding value of that land. For sites where there are uncertainties with respect to what the remediation obligations might be or what remediation techniques might be approved, and no reliable estimate can presently be made of regulatory and remediation costs, no amounts have been capitalised, expensed or provided. The provision is the best estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to settle the restoration obligation at the reporting date, based on current legal requirements and technology. Future restoration costs are reviewed annually and any changes are reflected in the present value of the restoration provision at the end of the reporting period. The discount rate used to determine the present value reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised in borrowing costs. (b) Decommissioning The present value of the estimated costs of dismantling and removing an asset and restoring the site on which it is located are recognised as an asset within property, plant and equipment and as a provision where a legal or constructive obligation exists. At each reporting date, the liability is remeasured in line with changes in discount rates, timing and estimated cash flows. Any changes in the liability are added to or deducted from the related asset, other than the unwinding of the discount which is recognised as an interest expense in the Income Statement. Current Provisions are made for liabilities to employees for annual leave, sick leave and other current employee entitlements that represent the amount for which the Group has a present obligation. These have been calculated at undiscounted amounts based on the wage and salary rates that the Group expects to pay as at each reporting date and include related on-costs. Non-current Liabilities for employee entitlements which are not expected to be settled within twelve months of balance date, such as long service leave, are accrued at the present value of future amounts expected to be paid. The present value is determined using interest rates applicable to government guaranteed securities with maturities approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations. Short term incentive plans A liability is recognised for short term incentive plans on the achievement of predetermined short term incentive plan performance measures and the benefit calculations are formally documented and determined before signing the financial report. (d) Retirement benefit obligation Contributions to defined contribution superannuation funds are taken to the Income Statement in the year in which the expense is incurred. For defined benefit schemes, the cost of providing superannuation is charged to the Income Statement so as to recognise current and past service costs, interest cost on defined benefit obligations, and the effect of any curtailments or settlements, net of expected returns on plan assets. All actuarial gains and losses as at 1 October 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, were recognised in retained earnings. All actuarial gains and losses that arise subsequent to 1 October 2004 are recognised directly in equity. The Group’s net obligation in respect of defined benefit superannuation plans is calculated by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to determine its present value, and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The discount rate is the yield at the balance sheet date on government bonds that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations. The calculation is performed by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method. (e) Dividends A provision for dividends payable is recognised in the reporting period in which the dividends are paid, or a legal right to pay is established, for the entire undistributed amount, regardless of the extent to which they will be paid. (f) Restructuring and employee termination benefits Provisions for restructuring or termination benefits are only recognised when a detailed plan has been approved and the restructuring or termination benefits have either commenced or been publicly announced, or firm contracts related to the restructuring or termination benefits have been entered into. Costs related to ongoing activities are not provided for. (g) Onerous contracts A provision for onerous contracts is recognised after impairment losses on assets dedicated to the contract have been recognised and when the expected benefits are less than the unavoidable costs of meeting the contractual obligations. A provision is recognised to the extent that the contractual obligations exceed unrecognised assets. 52 52 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) (xviii) Trade and other payables Trade and other payables are stated at cost and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of financial year which are unpaid. Unfavourable sales / supplier contracts Liabilities are recognised on acquisition where it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle an obligation (probable loss), and the fair value of the loss can be measured reliably. If the terms of a contract are unfavourable relative to market terms at the acquisition date, a liability is recognised as part of accounting for the business combination. (xix) Foreign currency transactions Functional and presentation currency Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is Incitec Pivot Limited’s presentation currency. Transactions and balances Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Income Statement, except when they are deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges. Non-monetary assets and liabilities carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined. Non- monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated. Foreign operations On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the Group’s overseas operations are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period unless exchange rates fluctuate significantly. Exchange differences arising, if any, are recognised in the foreign currency translation reserve, and recognised in income on disposal of the foreign operation. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisitions of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. (xx) Derivative financial instruments The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange, commodity price and interest rate risks arising from operational, financing and investment activities. In accordance with its treasury policy, the Group does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value. The gain or loss on remeasurement to fair value is recognised immediately in the Income Statement. However, where derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, the gain or loss is transferred to the cash flow hedging reserve or foreign currency translation reserve. Hedging On entering into a hedging relationship, the Group formally designates and documents the hedge relationship and the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation includes identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the entity will assess the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk. Such hedges are expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows and are assessed on an ongoing basis to determine that they actually have been highly effective throughout the financial reporting periods for which they are designated. Cash flow hedges Changes in fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow hedge are recognised directly in equity to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognised in the Income Statement. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the Income Statement in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recognised in equity is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is recognised. If the hedged transaction is no longer expected to take place, then the cumulative unrealised gain or loss recognised in equity is recognised immediately in the Income Statement. Hedges of a net investment Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, including a hedge of monetary item that is accounted for as part of the net investment, are accounted for in a similar way as cash flow hedges. Gains or losses on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge are recognised directly in equity (foreign currency translation reserve) while any gains or losses relating to the ineffective portion are recognised in profit and loss. On disposal of the foreign operation, the cumulative value of such gains or losses recognised directly to equity is transferred to other comprehensive income based on the amount calculated using the direct method of consolidation. (xxi) Cash and cash equivalents For presentation purposes on the Statement of Cash Flows, cash includes cash at bank, cash on hand and deposits at call which are readily convertible to cash on hand and which are used in the cash management function, net of bank overdrafts. (xxii) Share capital Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options for the acquisition of a business are not included in the cost of the acquisition as part of the purchase consideration. If the entity reacquires its own equity instruments, eg as the result of a share buy-back, those instruments are deducted from equity and the associated shares are cancelled. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 53 53 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) (xxii) Share capital (continued) No gain or loss is recognised in the profit or loss and the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes), is recognised directly in equity. (xxiii) Fair value estimation The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities is estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes. The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price; the appropriate quoted market price for financial liabilities is the current ask price. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the counter derivatives) is determined using valuation techniques. The Group uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance date. Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments are used for long-term debt instruments held. Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments. The fair value of interest-rate contracts is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of cross currency interest rate swaps is determined using market based forward interest and exchange rates and the present value of estimated future cash flows. The fair value of foreign exchange options is determined using market rates and a present value calculation based on the Black Scholes method. The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the balance sheet date and the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities is estimated by discounting the future cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments. (xxiv) Impairment of assets The carrying amount of the Group’s assets excluding defined benefit fund assets, inventories, deferred tax assets, goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets is reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any evidence of impairment. If such indication exists, the asset is tested for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount to its carrying amount. Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are tested for impairment annually. The recoverable amount of an asset (excluding receivables – refer to Note 1 (viii)) is determined as the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use. The recoverable amount is estimated for each individual asset or where it is not possible to estimate for individual assets, it is estimated for the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. A cash generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or group of assets with each cash generating unit being no larger than a segment. In calculating recoverable amount, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present values using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the risks specific to the asset or cash generating unit. Cash flows are estimated for the asset in its present condition and therefore do not include cash inflows or outflows that improve or enhance the assets performance or that may arise from future restructuring. An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying amount of an asset or its cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in the Income Statement. Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units (CGUs) are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to CGUs and then, to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit. (xxv) Goods and services tax Revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities other than receivables and payables, are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the relevant taxation authorities. In these circumstances, the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of expense. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the relevant taxation authorities is included as a current asset or liability in the Statement of Financial Position. Cash flows are included in the Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to, the relevant taxation authorities are classified as operating cash flows. (xxvi) Rounding of amounts The Group is of a kind referred to in Class order 98/0100 (updated by Class Order 05/641 and Class Order 06/51), issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, relating to the ''rounding off'' of amounts in the Financial Report. Amounts in the financial report have been rounded off in accordance with that Class Order to the nearest one hundred thousand dollars, or in certain cases, the nearest one thousand dollars. (xxvii) Restatement of prior year tax benefit For the year ended 30 September 2009, a tax benefit of $158.7m was recognised in relation to realised foreign exchange losses that were assessed as fully deductible in the preparation of the Financial Report and disclosed in Note 6 as an individually material item. In preparing the 30 September 2009 tax return during 2010, the deductibility of foreign exchange losses was reassessed and reduced by $41.5m to $117.2m. Accordingly, amounts relating to this item in the 2009 Financial Report have been restated as follows: Income tax benefit / (Income tax expense) Profit /(Loss) for the financial year Total comprehensive income / (expense) for the financial year Deferred tax assets Total assets Net assets Retained earnings Total equity 2009 Adjustment $mill $mill Restated 2009 $mill 134.7 (41.5) 93.2 (179.9) (41.5) (221.4) (457.1) 354.2 6,631.2 3,381.1 44.2 3,381.1 (41.5) (41.5) (41.5) (41.5) (41.5) (41.5) (498.6) 312.7 6,589.7 3,339.6 2.7 3,339.6 EPS - basic and diluted (11.7) (2.7) (14.4) As the tax benefit was only recognised at the end of the 2009 financial year, no adjustments to the 2008 comparatives in the Statement of Financial Position were needed and accordingly a third Statement of Financial Position has not been disclosed. 54 54 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 2. Critical accounting estimates and judgements Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectation of future events that may have a financial impact on the Group and that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Critical accounting estimates and assumptions Management makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the subsequent related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below. Management believes the following are the critical accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of the Financial Report: • • • • provision for environmental and restructuring liabilities; • the testing for impairment of assets; the testing for impairment of goodwill; income tax related assumptions and estimates; the calculation of annual superannuation costs and related assets and liabilities; and valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. • Impairment of assets (i) The determination of impairment for property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets involves the use of estimates that include, but are not limited to, the cause, timing and amount of the impairment. Impairment is based on a large number of factors, such as changes in competitive positions, expectations of growth, increased cost of capital, current replacement costs, increases in cost of inputs, and other factors which may indicate impairment. An asset is considered impaired when the recoverable amount is less than the carrying value. Recoverable amount is determined as the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use. In calculating value-in-use, the cash flows include projections of cash inflows and outflows from continuing use of the asset and cash flows associated with disposal of the asset. The cash flows are estimated for the asset in its current condition. In assessing value-in-use, the estimated cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the risks specific to the asset or Cash Generating Unit (CGU). The identification of impairment indicators, the estimation of future cash flows and the determination of fair values of assets (or groups of assets) requires management to make significant estimates and judgements concerning the identification of impairment indicators, earnings before interest and tax, growth rates, applicable discount rates, useful lives and residual or terminal values. Refer Note 1 (xxiv) for further details regarding the accounting policy regarding ‘Impairment of assets’. Management believes that this policy is critical to the financial statements, particularly when evaluating the Group’s assets for impairment. Varying results from this impairment analysis are possible due to the significant estimates and judgements involved. (ii) Impairment of goodwill The Group tests annually whether goodwill has incurred any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 1 (xiii) (a). The recoverable amounts of CGUs have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of assumptions, including forecast earnings before interest and tax, growth rates and discount rates. Refer to Note 18 for details of these assumptions and the potential impact of changes to the assumptions. The assumptions are management’s best estimates based on current and forecast market conditions. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting these assumptions could result in additional impairment charges in future periods. Management believes that this policy is critical to the financial statements, particularly when evaluating the Group’s goodwill for impairment. Varying results from this analysis are possible due to the significant estimates and judgements involved in the Group’s evaluations. (iii) Income taxes The Group is subject to income taxes in Australia and overseas jurisdictions. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. In addition, deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the assets can be utilised. The Group’s assumptions regarding future realisation may change due to future operating performance and other factors. (iv) Environmental and restructuring provisions Provisions for environmental and restructuring / redundancy liabilities are based on the Group’s best estimate of the outflow of resources required to settle commitments made by the Group. Where the outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the Income Statement in the period in which such determination is made. Refer Note 1 (xvii) (a) & Note 1 (xvii) (f) to the financial statements for further details of the accounting policy relating to environmental and restructuring provisions. Also refer to Note 23 for amounts recognised for environmental and restructuring provisions. (v) Retirement benefit obligations A liability or asset in respect of defined benefit superannuation plans is recognised in the Statement of Financial Position, and is measured as the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the reporting date plus unrecognised actuarial gains (less unrecognised actuarial losses) less the fair value of the superannuation fund’s assets at that date and any unrecognised past service cost. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is based on expected future payments which arise from membership of the fund to the reporting date, calculated annually by independent actuaries. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows. Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity. Refer Note 1 (xvii) (d) to the financial statements for further details of the accounting policy relating to retirement benefit obligations. Refer Note 25 of the financial statements for details of the key assumptions used in determining the accounting for these plans. The following are the main categories of assumptions used: • discount rate; • • expected return on plan assets; and • future salary increases. future rate of inflation; (vi) Business combinations Fair valuing assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, involves making assumptions about the timing of cash inflows and outflows, commodity prices, growth assumptions, discount rates and cost of debt. Refer to Note 28 for details of acquisitions made during the period. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 55 55 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 3. Segment report (a) Identification of reportable segments The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Group’s Executive Team in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. The operating segments are identified by management and are based on the market and region in which product is sold. Discrete financial information about each of these operating businesses is usually reported to the Executive Team on at least a monthly basis. (b) Description of operating segments Fertilisers: Incitec Pivot Fertilisers (IPF): manufactures and distributes fertilisers in Eastern Australia. The products that IPF manufactures include Single Super Phosphate, Urea and Ammonia. IPF also import products from overseas suppliers and purchases Ammonium Phosphates from Southern Cross International for resale. Southern Cross International (SCI): manufactures Ammonium Phosphates, is a distributor of its manufactured fertiliser product to wholesalers in Australia (including IPF) and the export market. SCI also has a 65% share of the Hong Kong trading company, Quantum Fertilisers Limited and operates an Industrial Chemicals business. Fertilisers Elimination (Elim): represents the elimination of profit in stock arising from SCI sales to IPF. Explosives: Dyno Nobel Americas (DNA): principal activity is the manufacture and sale of industrial explosives and related products and services to the mining, quarrying and construction industries in the Americas, and the manufacture and sale of Agricultural chemicals. Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific (DNAP): principal activity is the manufacture and sale of industrial explosives and related products and services to the mining industry in the Asia Pacific region. Explosives Eliminations (Elim): represents eliminations of profit in stock arising from DNA sales to DNAP. (c) Accounting policies and inter-segment transactions Corporate (Corp): Corporate costs include all head office expenses that cannot be directly attributed to the operation of any of the Group's businesses. Inter-entity sales are recognised based on an arm’s length transfer price. The price aims to reflect what the business operation could achieve if they sold their output and services to external parties at arm’s length. Note that comparatives have been restated as a result of the change in reportable segments. 56 56 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 3. Segment report (continued) (d) Reportable segments 30 September 2010 IPF $mill SCI $mill Elim $mill Total Fertilisers $mill Sales to external customers 885.9 647.1 (145.4) 1,387.6 DNAP $mill 499.8 DNA $mill Elim $mill Total Explosives $mill Consolidated Group $mill Corp $mill 1,092.5 (48.2) 1,544.1 - 2,931.7 Share of profits in associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method Earnings before interest, related income tax expense, depreciation and amortisation and individually material items Depreciation and amortisation Earnings before interest, related income tax expense and individually material items Net interest expense Income tax expense Profit after tax (excluding individually material items) Individually material items Profit after tax - - - - 12.9 17.6 - 30.5 - 30.5 141.6 (29.2) 236.9 (14.3) (0.6) - 377.9 (43.5) 196.0 (20.0) 236.5 (73.3) 1.5 - 434.0 (93.3) (24.6) (2.2) 787.3 (139.0) 112.4 222.6 (0.6) 334.4 176.0 163.2 1.5 340.7 (26.8) 648.3 (53.0) (150.8) 444.5 (32.3) 412.2 30 September 2009 IPF $mill SCI $mill Elim $mill Total Fertilisers $mill Sales to external customers 950.2 777.5 (136.4) 1,591.3 DNAP $mill 505.7 DNA $mill Elim $mill Total Explosives $mill Consolidated Group $mill Corp $mill 1,388.4 (66.5) 1,827.6 - 3,418.9 Share of profits in associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method Earnings before interest, related income tax expense, depreciation and amortisation and individually material items Depreciation and amortisation Earnings before interest, related income tax expense and individually material items Net interest expense Income tax expense Profit after tax (excluding individually material items) Individually material items Loss after tax - - - - 5.3 19.7 - 25.0 - 25.0 121.1 (27.1) 195.8 (12.5) 24.3 - 341.2 (39.6) 135.6 (25.8) 297.4 (99.7) (3.8) - 429.2 (125.5) (27.4) (2.2) 743.0 (167.3) 94.0 183.3 24.3 301.6 109.8 197.7 (3.8) 303.7 (29.6) 575.7 (107.6) (120.3) 347.8 (569.2) (221.4) Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 57 57 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 3. Segment report (continued) (e) Geographical information – secondary reporting segments The Group operates in four principal countries being Australia (country of domicile), USA, Canada and Turkey. In presenting information on the basis of geographical information, revenue is based on the geographical location of the entity making the sale. Assets are based on the geographical location of the assets. 30 September 2010 Revenue from external customers Non-current assets other than financial instruments and deferred tax assets Australia $mill USA Canada $mill $mill Turkey Other/Elim Consolidated $mill $mill $mill 1,871.8 770.3 235.9 14.8 38.9 2,931.7 2,702.5 2,115.4 80.0 146.2 76.9 5,121.0 30 September 2009 Australia $mill USA Canada $mill $mill Turkey Other/Elim Consolidated $mill $mill $mill Revenue from external customers Non-current assets other than financial instruments and deferred tax assets 2,097.5 986.1 306.6 2,590.3 2,336.7 95.1 - - 28.7 3,418.9 85.1 5,107.2 58 58 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 4. Revenue and other income Revenue External sales Total revenue Other income Net foreign exchange gains Royalty income and management fees Net gain on sale of property, plant and equipment Other income Gain on Nitromak acquisition Total other income Financial income Interest income from external parties Interest income from jointly controlled entities Total financial income Total other and financial income 5. Expenses Profit before income tax includes the following specific expenses: Depreciation & Amortisation depreciation amortisation Recoverable amount write-down property, plant and equipment intangible assets Amounts set aside to provide for impairment loss on trade and other receivables employee entitlements environmental liabilities inventory losses and obsolescence other provisions restructuring Lease payments – operating leases Net foreign exchange losses Research and development expense Defined contribution superannuation expense Defined benefit superannuation expense Financial expenses Write off of borrowing costs Unwinding of discount on provisions and other payables Interest expenses on financial liabilities Interest expenses on financial liabilities with jointly controlled entities Total financial expenses Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill Notes 2,931.7 2,931.7 3,418.9 3,418.9 (29) (34) 0.6 23.8 4.3 0.7 19.0 48.4 2.8 2.5 5.3 53.7 (17) (18) (29) 112.1 26.9 139.0 (17),(29) (18),(29) (23) (23) (23) (25) (6) (29) (34) 0.7 - 0.7 1.1 8.3 24.9 1.2 1.8 6.8 55.0 - 7.8 11.1 8.0 - 13.8 44.2 0.3 58.3 - 22.9 13.3 0.4 - 36.6 9.2 1.6 10.8 47.4 139.0 31.5 170.5 80.4 490.6 571.0 2.4 29.1 17.1 125.3 0.7 27.4 52.5 1.5 8.1 15.1 7.9 7.7 9.1 108.8 0.5 126.1 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 59 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 6. Individually material items Profit includes the following revenues and expenses whose disclosure is relevant in explaining the financial performance of the Group: Business restructuring costs - Dyno Nobel Integration(1) restructuring and other direct costs employee redundancies and allowances Total business restructuring Business restructuring costs - Manufacturing and Distribution(2) restructuring and other direct costs employee redundancies and allowances Total business restructuring Other write-off of borrowing costs (3) inventory NRV provision (4) tax benefit on foreign exchange (5) impairment of intangible assets(6) accounting acquisition profit - Nitromak(7) asbestos environmental costs at various sites(8) Total other Gross $mill 2010 Tax $mill Restated 2009 Net $mill Gross $mill Tax $mill Net $mill (7.8) (16.7) (24.5) (18.7) (8.0) (26.7) - - - - 19.0 (23.2) (4.2) 2.4 5.3 7.7 5.8 2.7 8.5 - - - - - 6.9 6.9 (5.4) (11.4) (16.8) (12.9) (5.3) (18.2) - - - - 19.0 (16.3) 2.7 (24.3) (33.7) (58.0) (127.7) (14.5) (142.2) (7.7) (84.2) - (490.6) - - (582.5) 8.0 12.0 20.0 43.9 4.8 48.7 (16.3) (21.7) (38.0) (83.8) (9.7) (93.5) 2.3 25.3 117.2 - - - 144.8 (5.4) (58.9) 117.2 (490.6) - - (437.7) Individually material items (55.4) 23.1 (32.3) (782.7) 213.5 (569.2) (1) Following the acquisition of Dyno Nobel Limited, restructuring and integration expenditure has been incurred including employee redundancy costs as well as IT expenditure in creating common networks and collaboration between sites. (2) The impact of the Global Financial Crisis resulted in the Group changing its strategy in how it manages its manufacturing and distribution assets. The Group changed from a growth focus to a maintenance focus which has resulted in a restructuring of manufacturing and distribution operations leading to redundancies, termination of capital projects and exiting / idling certain sites (Cockle Creek, Geelong, Maitland, Port Ewen and Battle Mountain). (3) Direct transaction costs in relation to the Bridge Loan facility negotiated in order to acquire the remaining shares in Dyno Nobel Limited during the 2009 financial year. As the Bridge Loan facility was replaced with new borrowings, its establishment costs were written off. (4) During 2009, sales volumes and market prices for imported phosphate rock based products declined significantly. The provision represents the write down of the phosphate rock component of finished goods and phosphate rock on hand to net realisable value. (5) Tax benefit associated with foreign exchange losses realised on USD Debt. (6) Impairment of goodwill recognised on the acquisition of Dyno Nobel Limited. (7) During 2010, the Group acquired the remaining 50% interest in Nitromak DNX Kimya Samayii Anonim Sirketi (Nitromak), making Nitromak a fully owned subsidiary. AASB 3 Business Combinations requires that the original 50% investment is revalued to fair value in the Income Statement when the Group gained control of Nitromak, which resulted in a gain of $33.4 million, offset by $14.4 million of foreign exchange losses, resulting in a net gain of $19.0 million. (8) Environmental costs at various sites, including estimated costs to remediate asbestos identified at some sites. 60 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 7. Auditor's remuneration Total remuneration received, or due and receivable, by the auditors for: Audit services Auditors of the Group - KPMG Australia Auditors of the Group - KPMG Overseas Other auditors Other assurance services - debt issue Non audit services Auditors of the Group - KPMG Australia taxation services other services Consolidated 2010 $000 2009 $000 1,092.5 992.7 25.0 231.0 2,341.2 - 80.1 80.1 2,421.3 1,543.4 1,393.3 106.8 - 3,043.5 266.0 380.0 646.0 3,689.5 From time to time, the auditors provide other services to the Group, which are subject to strict corporate governance procedures adopted by the Group which encompass the selection of service providers and the setting of their remuneration. The Board Audit and Risk Management Committee must approve individual non audit services provided by KPMG above a value of $20,000, as well as where the aggregate amount exceeds 20% of the audit fee. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 61 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 8. Income tax expense / (benefit) Income tax expense / (benefit) (a) Current tax Current year Over provision in prior years Benefit of favourable tax ruling Deferred tax Origination and reversal of temporary differences Total income tax expense / (benefit) (b) Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense / (benefit) and pre-tax accounting profit / (loss) Profit / (loss) before income tax Income tax expense / (benefit) attributable to profit / (loss) before income tax Tax at the Australian tax rate of 30% (2009 at 30%) on profit / (loss) before income tax Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible / (taxable) in calculating taxable income: Depreciation and amortisation Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment Research and development incentive Share-based payments Participation facility Impairment of intangible assets Valuation allowances Foreign exchange losses Sundry items Difference in overseas tax rates Benefit of favourable tax ruling Overprovision in prior years Income tax expense / (benefit) attributable to profit (c) Amounts recognised directly in equity Aggregate current and deferred tax arising in the reporting period and not recognised in net profit or loss but directly debited or charged to equity Net deferred tax - debited / (charged) directly to equity 62 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Consolidated Restated 2009 $mill 2010 $mill 100.6 (4.1) - 96.5 31.2 127.7 (4.6) - (21.6) (26.2) (67.0) (93.2) 539.9 (314.6) 162.0 (94.4) - - (3.5) 0.7 (13.2) - - - (16.1) 129.9 1.9 - (4.1) 127.7 3.0 0.2 (4.3) 0.5 (16.9) 147.2 32.9 (110.3) (27.1) (69.2) (2.4) (21.6) - (93.2) 26.1 26.1 12.3 12.3 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 9. Earnings per share (EPS) Basic earnings / (losses) per share including individually material items excluding individually material items Diluted earnings / (losses) per share including individually material items excluding individually material items Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (1) Profit / (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders Consolidated 2010 Cents per share Notes 25.3 27.3 25.3 27.3 Restated 2009 Cents per share (14.4) 22.6 (14.4) 22.6 Number Number 1,623,134,164 1,541,925,068 Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 410.5 (221.4) Reconciliation of earnings used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share excluding individually material items Profit / (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders Add back individually material items after income tax Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders excluding individually material items (6) 410.5 32.3 442.8 (221.4) 569.2 347.8 (1) 16,193,772 shares were issued during the year ended 30 September 2010, refer Note 26. 10. Cash and cash equivalents Cash at bank and on hand Deposits at call external Consolidated 2010 $mill 47.9 0.8 48.7 2009 $mill 84.0 41.2 125.2 Notes (29) Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 63 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 11. Trade and other receivables Current Trade debtors external jointly controlled entities and associates Less impairment losses external Sundry debtors / loans external jointly controlled entities and associates Non-current Sundry debtors / loans external jointly controlled entities and associates Less impairment losses external 12. Inventories Raw materials and stores at cost Work in progress at cost Finished goods at cost less provision for inventory losses, obsolescence and net realisable value Finished goods 13. Other assets Current Prepayments Other Non-current Prepayments Other 14. Other financial assets Current Investments available for sale - listed shares Derivative financial instruments cross currency swaps option contracts forward exchange contracts Non-current Derivative financial instruments cross currency swaps 64 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill Notes (34) (33) (34) 419.4 24.8 (5.6) 438.6 4.9 0.3 5.2 443.8 3.4 13.8 (1.9) 15.3 51.6 32.5 259.9 (7.5) 252.4 336.5 26.6 9.6 36.2 0.7 1.8 2.5 262.8 19.3 (6.8) 275.3 47.6 0.1 47.7 323.0 8.2 24.1 (0.2) 32.1 42.9 49.2 409.1 (104.1) 305.0 397.1 22.1 8.6 30.7 4.7 - 4.7 (33) (33) (33) (33) 30.2 46.9 61.3 - 20.1 111.6 11.7 12.6 - 71.2 28.7 28.7 135.9 135.9 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 14. Other financial assets (continued) Sensitivity analysis – equity price risk All of the equity investments are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. A 5% increase in the share prices of these equities at the reporting date would have increased equity (pre-tax) by $1.5m (2009: $2.3m); an equal decrease would have decreased equity (pre-tax) by $1.5m (2009: $2.3m). 15. Assets classified as held for sale Land and buildings held for sale Investments accounted for using the equity method Machinery, plant and equipment held for sale Notes (16) Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 4.8 - 4.3 9.1 4.3 44.0 6.0 54.3 Assets classified as held for sale consist of various sites which are either vacant land or sites which the Group has already exited or is planning to dispose of within the next 12 months. During the year, the Group acquired the remaining 50% share of Nitromak. 16. Investments accounted for using the equity method Name of Entity Principal Activity Ownership interest Country of incorporation Jointly controlled entities Alpha Dyno Nobel Inc Delivery of explosives and related products Boren Explosives Company Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Buckley Powder Company Delivery of explosives and related products IRECO Midwest, Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Wampum Hardware Company Delivery of explosives and related products Pepin-IRECO, Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Midland Powder Company Delivery of explosives and related products Mine Equipment & Mill Supply Co. Delivery of explosives and related products Controlled Explosives Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Western Explosives Systems Company Delivery of explosives and related products DetNet Detonadores Electronico Limitada Delivery of explosives and related products Newfoundland Hard-Rok Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Dyno Labrador Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Quantum Explosives Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Dene Dyno Nobel Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products Qaaqtuq Dyno Nobel Inc. Delivery of explosives and related products (1) Refer to footnote description on next page. 50% 50% 51% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 49% 49% (1) USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA Chile Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 65 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 16. Investments accounted for using the equity method (continued) Name of Entity Principal Activity Queensland Nitrates Pty Ltd Production of ammonium nitrate Queensland Nitrates Management Pty Ltd Management services DetNet International Limited Distribution of electronic detonators DetNet South Africa (Pty) Ltd Development, manufacture and supply of electronic detonators DNEX Mexico Inc Mexican investment holding company Distribution of explosives and related products Ownership interest Country of incorporation 50% 50% 50% 50% 49% 49% Australia Australia (2) (2) Ireland South Africa Mexico Mexico Explosivos De La Region Lagunera, S.A. de C.V. Explosivos De La Region Central, S.A. de C.V. Nitroexplosivos de Ciudad Guzman, S.A. de C.V. Explosivos Y Servicios Para La Construccion, S.A. de C.V. Distribution of explosives and related products 49% Mexico Distribution of explosives and related products 49% Mexico Distribution of explosives and related products 49% Mexico Tenaga Kimia Ensign-Bickford Sdn Bhd Manufacture of explosive accessories Sasol Dyno Nobel (Pty) Ltd Distribution of detonators Associates Labrador Maskua Ashini Ltd Delivery of explosives and related products Fabchem China Ltd Valley Hydraulics Ltd Manufacture of commercial explosives Delivery of explosives and related products Apex Construction Specialities Ltd Delivery of explosives and related products Warex Corporation Warex LLC Delivery of explosives and related products Delivery of explosives and related products 50% 50% 25% 30% 25% 25% 25% 25% Malaysia South Africa (2) Canada Singapore Canada Canada USA USA (1) Due to the contractual and decision making arrangement between the shareholders of the entities, despite the legal ownership exceeding 50%, this entity is not considered to be a subsidiary. (2) These jointly controlled entities have a 30 June year end. For the purpose of applying the equity method of accounting, the financial information through to 30 September 2010 has been used. 66 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 16. Investments accounted for using the equity method (continued) Summarised financial information of jointly controlled entities and associates: Current assets Non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Revenue Net profit Share of jointly controlled entities and associates' profit: Share of jointly controlled entities and associates' profit before tax Share of jointly controlled entities and associates' income tax expense Share of jointly controlled entities and associates' profit Carrying amount of investments in jointly controlled entities and associates Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Share in jointly controlled entities reclassified to assets held for sale Share of net profit from jointly controlled entities and associates Less: dividends received / receivable Movement in foreign currency translation reserve of jointly controlled entities and associates Carrying amount at end of the financial year Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill Notes 252.3 280.4 532.7 131.7 95.6 227.3 308.1 326.8 634.9 227.3 101.6 328.9 305.4 306.0 796.8 65.6 1,000.6 60.0 42.4 (11.9) 30.5 35.8 (10.8) 25.0 254.0 - 254.0 30.5 (17.1) (10.9) 256.5 311.2 (44.0) 267.2 25.0 (5.2) (33.0) 254.0 (29) (15) (34) The Group’s share of the capital commitments, other expenditures and contingent liabilities are disclosed in Notes 30 and 31. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 67 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 17. Property, plant and equipment Consolidated At 1 October 2008 Cost Accumulated depreciation Construction in progress Net book amount Year ended 30 September 2009 Opening net book amount Reclassification (to) / from fixed assets classified as held for sale Additions Disposals Depreciation charge (5) Impairment of assets (5) Foreign exchange movement Closing net book amount At 1 October 2009 Cost Accumulated depreciation Construction in progress Net book amount Year ended 30 September 2010 Opening net book amount Acquisition of business Reclassification from fixed assets classified as held for sale Additions Disposals Depreciation charge Impairment of assets Foreign exchange movement Closing net book amount (5) (5) At 30 September 2010 Cost Accumulated depreciation Construction in progress Net book amount Freehold land Machinery, plant and equipment and buildings $mill $mill Notes 438.9 (113.5) 5.1 330.5 330.5 0.1 15.2 (5.9) (15.8) (4.6) (13.2) 306.3 425.1 (128.8) 10.0 306.3 306.3 6.1 - 179.0 (6.7) (13.2) - (11.9) 459.6 449.4 (141.1) 151.3 459.6 1,285.5 (302.2) 356.8 1,340.1 1,340.1 (7.1) 313.5 (31.8) (123.2) (75.8) (58.6) 1,357.1 1,347.9 (385.2) 394.4 1,357.1 1,357.1 2.1 0.5 180.3 (8.0) (98.9) (0.7) (47.9) 1,384.5 1,471.1 (521.3) 434.7 1,384.5 Total $mill 1,724.4 (415.7) 361.9 1,670.6 1,670.6 (7.0) 328.7 (37.7) (139.0) (80.4) (71.8) 1,663.4 1,773.0 (514.0) 404.4 1,663.4 1,663.4 8.2 0.5 359.3 (14.7) (112.1) (0.7) (59.8) 1,844.1 1,920.5 (662.4) 586.0 1,844.1 Non-current asset impairment During the year ended 30 September 2010, impairment of property, plant and equipment occurred to the value of $0.7m (2009: $80.4m) as a result of the Group’s fixed asset verification procedures and the abandonment of certain assets. Capitalised interest During the year ended 30 September 2010 interest of $25.2m (2009: $18.2m) was capitalised relating to interest bearing liabilities used specifically to fund qualifying assets (expansion projects) as defined under AASB123 Borrowing Costs. 68 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 18. Intangible assets Consolidated At 1 October 2008 Cost Accumulated amortisation Net book amount Notes Software $mill Goodwill $mill Patents, Trademarks & Customer Contracts Brand Names $mill $mill 47.8 (13.0) 34.8 3,408.6 - 3,408.6 250.1 (6.4) 243.7 275.0 - 275.0 Other $mill 5.9 (5.9) - Total $mill 3,987.4 (25.3) 3,962.1 Year ended 30 September 2009 Opening net book amount Additions Amortisation charge Impairment of assets Foreign exchange movement Closing net book amount 34.8 16.0 (10.7) - (2.7) 37.4 (5) (5) 3,408.6 - - (490.6) (268.7) 2,649.3 At 1 October 2009 Cost Accumulated amortisation Net book amount 59.9 (22.5) 37.4 2,649.3 - 2,649.3 Year ended 30 September 2010 Opening net book amount Acquisition of business Additions Amortisation charge Foreign exchange movement Closing net book amount 37.4 0.2 3.8 (9.2) (2.3) 29.9 (5) 2,649.3 150.0 2.0 - (247.8) 2,553.5 At 30 September 2010 Cost Accumulated amortisation Net book amount 60.4 (30.5) 29.9 2,553.5 - 2,553.5 243.7 - (20.8) - (12.0) 210.9 235.1 (24.2) 210.9 210.9 1.1 - (17.7) (13.5) 180.8 220.6 (39.8) 180.8 275.0 - - - (19.6) 255.4 255.4 - 255.4 255.4 4.0 - - (21.0) 238.4 238.4 - 238.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,962.1 16.0 (31.5) (490.6) (303.0) 3,153.0 3,199.7 (46.7) 3,153.0 3,153.0 155.3 5.8 (26.9) (284.6) 3,002.6 3,072.9 (70.3) 3,002.6 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 69 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 18. Intangible assets (continued) (a) Allocation of goodwill The Group’s goodwill is allocated as follows: IPF SCI DNAP DNA Nitromak 2010 $mill 183.8 1.9 1,098.4 1,126.5 142.9 2,553.5 2009 $mill 183.8 - 1,216.0 1,249.5 - 2,649.3 (b) Impairment testing The carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at 30 September and all other assets are tested when there is an indicator that an asset may be impaired. If an asset is deemed to be impaired it is written down to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is based on the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Value-in-use is calculated using cash flow projections based on financial forecasts for a period of five years as approved by management. (c) Key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations Key assumptions used to test for impairment, include: IPF SCI DNAP DNA Nitromak Terminal Growth Rate 2009 % 2.5 2010 % 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 - Discount rate* 2010 % 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.5 2009 % 10.2 10.2 9.0 9.0 - * The discount rate used reflects underlying cost of capital adjusted for market risk. (d) Impairment charge As a result of the annual impairment testing, the Group recognised a non-cash impairment charge of $nil in the year ended 30 September 2010 (2009: $490.6m). (e) Sensitivity analysis As part of impairment testing, a sensitivity analysis was conducted on the effect of changes in forecasted cash flows and discount rates. A summary of key sensitivities is listed below: IPF SCI DNAP DNA Nitromak Terminal Growth Rate -0.5% $mill (27.8) +0.5% $mill 31.1 23.4 79.1 176.6 8.4 (20.9) (67.8) (151.4) (7.4) Discount Rate +0.5% $mill (39.9) (28.6) (83.9) (187.7) (9.8) -0.5% $mill 44.6 32.0 97.9 219.0 11.0 70 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 19. Deferred tax assets The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to: Impairment of trade and other receivables Employee entitlements provision Retirement benefit obligations Restructuring and rationalisation provision Environmental provision Other provisions Inventories Property, plant and equipment Foreign exchange losses Share buy-back expenses Share issue expenses Cash flow hedges Unfavourable supplier contracts Tax losses Other Deferred tax assets Consolidated Restated 2009 $mill 2010 $mill Notes 8.0 10.8 28.5 3.9 28.0 10.9 3.5 33.3 13.8 - 1.1 0.5 128.7 69.9 23.2 364.1 1.5 11.4 7.3 5.6 25.9 4.5 20.3 61.0 10.6 0.6 - 3.9 153.1 135.8 49.0 490.5 Set-off of deferred tax liabilities pursuant to set-off provisions (24) (190.2) (177.8) Net deferred tax assets Movements: Opening balance at 1 October Credited to the Income Statement Credited / (charged) to equity Foreign exchange movement Adjustments in respect of prior years Closing balance at 30 September 173.9 312.7 490.5 (115.2) (26.1) 20.0 (5.1) 364.1 417.4 134.7 (8.7) (48.2) (4.7) 490.5 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 71 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 20. Trade and other payables Current Trade creditors external jointly controlled entities and associates Sundry creditors and accrued charges external jointly controlled entities and associates unfavourable sales / supplier contracts Non-current Sundry creditors and accrued charges share based payments unfavourable sales / supplier contracts Consolidated 2009 $mill 2010 $mill Notes (34) (34) 474.7 1.6 476.3 171.5 - 49.3 220.8 697.1 - 378.3 378.3 413.5 - 413.5 123.1 0.2 99.9 223.2 636.7 0.1 426.5 426.6 Unfavourable contracts Unfavourable contracts were recognised as part of the Southern Cross Fertilisers Pty Ltd acquisition in 2006 and the Dyno Nobel Limited acquisition in 2008. The liability is measured at acquisition date based on the unfavourable difference between the market rate and contractual rate with suppliers and customers and multiplying it by the volumes required to be purchased / supplied that are specified in the contracts. Where contract terms are greater than one year, cash flows are discounted by applying a pre-tax interest rate equivalent to the Group’s cost of debt. The liability is amortised based on contracted volumes determined in measuring the liability at acquisition date over the life of the contracts. Significant terms and conditions Trade creditors, including expenditures not yet billed, are recognised when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments as a result of a purchase of goods or services. Trade payables are normally settled within 62 days from invoice date, month end or within the agreed payment terms with the supplier. Net fair values The directors consider that the carrying amount of trade creditors and other payables approximate their net fair values. 72 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill Notes 21. Interest bearing liabilities Current Secured bank loans trade loans participation facilities inventory finance facility lease liability Unsecured bank loans working capital facility other bank loans other loans jointly controlled entities and associates (1) (33) Non-current Secured bank loans participation facilities lease liability Unsecured fixed interest rate bonds bank loans - 75.5 10.3 0.2 - 12.5 10.0 108.5 179.5 1.7 804.7 47.2 53.7 - 0.4 315.2 - 15.7 432.2 186.4 2.0 - working capital facility syndicated facility jointly controlled entities and associates (1) - 51.4 - 1,037.3 100.0 867.3 0.7 1,156.4 (33) (1) Loans from jointly controlled entities and associates relate to unsecured loans from joint ventures in Wampum Hardware Co and Alpha Dyno Nobel Inc. During the year, the Group undertook a number of financing activities: - - - - - A 144A / Regulation S bond was issued in the USA, proceeds of which were used to repay and cancel the Working Capital Facility and repay a portion of the Syndicated Facility. A$600.0m of committed limit under the Syndicated Facility was cancelled at the Group’s request. A short term Inventory Finance Facility was negotiated and drawn down. The Trade Loan Facility was cancelled. A second Participation Facility was negotiated and drawn down. Significant terms and conditions Interest expense is recognised progressively over the life of the facilities. Fixed Interest Rate Bonds In December 2009 the Group completed a US$800.0m 10 year bond issuance in the US 144A / Regulation S debt capital market. The bond is denominated in USD, has a fixed rate semi-annual coupon of 6% and matures in December 2019. The proceeds of this funding were used to repay and cancel the Working Capital Facility with the remaining proceeds used to partially repay the Syndicated Facility. Syndicated Facility The Syndicated Facility is a 3 year revolving facility that can be drawn in either AUD or USD. It has a remaining facility limit of A$1,080.0m (2009: A$1,680.0m) and matures on 4 October 2011. Participation Facilities The Participation Facilities mature in June 2013 and September 2014. The carrying amount of the facilities is A$255.0m and is secured against certain assets operated by Southern Cross Fertilisers Pty Ltd. The facilities are denominated in AUD and have fixed nominal interest rates of 8.93% and 9.63% respectively for the term of the facilities. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 73 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 21. Interest bearing liabilities (continued) Inventory Finance Facility In February 2010 the Group entered into a 364 day US$100.0m fertiliser Inventory Finance Facility. During the year US$40.0m of this limit was cancelled at the Group’s request. The facility is denominated in USD, has a floating interest rate plus a margin and matures in February 2011. The carrying amount of this facility is secured against a portion of the Group’s inventory. 22. Other financial liabilities Current Derivative financial instruments commodity contracts interest rate contracts 23. Provisions Current Employee entitlements Restructuring and rationalisation Environmental Asset retirement obligation Other Non-current Employee entitlements Restructuring and rationalisation Environmental Asset retirement obligation Other Aggregate employee entitlements Current Non-current Consolidated 2009 2010 Notes $mill $mill (33) (33) 1.7 - 1.7 - 12.9 12.9 24.5 13.4 34.6 1.4 8.3 82.2 13.1 4.0 51.3 13.5 0.7 82.6 24.5 13.1 37.6 24.8 24.4 29.6 1.7 12.9 93.4 12.4 11.2 44.5 13.1 6.3 87.5 24.8 12.4 37.2 The present value of the Group’s employee entitlements not expected to be settled within twelve months of balance date have been calculated using the following assumptions: Assumed rate of increase in wage and salary rates Average discount rate (risk free rate) Settlement term Employees at year end Full time equivalent 4.00% + age based scale 6.08% 10 years 2010 Number 4,998 2009 Number 4,622 74 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 23. Provisions (continued) Reconciliations Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of provisions from the beginning to the end of the current financial year are set out below. Current Provision - Dividends Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Provisions made during the year Payments made during the year Settled via Dividend Reinvestment Plan Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Current Provision - Restructuring and rationalisation Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Provisions made during the year Provisions written back during the year Payments made during the year Transfers from non-current Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Current Provision - Environmental Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Provisions made during the year Payments made during the year Transfers from non-current Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Current Provision - Asset retirement obligations Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Payments made during the year Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Current Provision - Other Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Provisions made during the year Payments made during the year Transfers from non-current Carrying amount at the end of the financial year See Note 1(xvii) for further details on the provisions noted above. Consolidated 2010 $mill Notes (27) (27) (5) (5) (5) - 66.4 (18.3) (48.1) - 24.4 6.8 (3.7) (16.9) 4.2 (1.4) 13.4 29.6 12.1 (11.7) 5.7 (1.1) 34.6 1.7 (0.1) (0.2) 1.4 12.9 1.8 (11.7) 5.3 8.3 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 75 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 23. Provisions (continued) Reconciliations (continued) Non-current Provision - Restructuring and rationalisation Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Transfers to current Provisions written back during the year Unwinding of discount Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Non-current Provision - Environmental Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Provisions made during the year Transfers to current Unwinding of discount Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Non-current Provision - Asset retirement obligations Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Provisions made during the year Unwinding of discount Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year Non-current Provision - Other Carrying amount at the beginning of the financial year Transfers to current Foreign currency exchange differences Carrying amount at the end of the financial year See Note 1 (xvii) for further details on the provisions noted above. Consolidated 2010 $mill Notes (5) 11.2 (4.2) (3.2) 0.3 (0.1) 4.0 44.5 12.8 (5.7) 1.0 (1.3) 51.3 13.1 0.3 0.4 (0.3) 13.5 6.3 (5.3) (0.3) 0.7 76 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 24. Deferred tax liabilities The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to: Inventories Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets Financial assets at fair value Cash flow hedges Foreign exchange (losses) / gains Provisions Other Deferred tax liabilities Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill Notes 0.7 219.6 116.2 - - (9.5) 4.4 48.9 380.3 0.9 228.6 133.7 9.9 8.7 4.5 32.8 71.5 490.6 Set-off of deferred tax liabilities pursuant to set-off provisions (19) (190.2) (177.8) Net deferred tax liabilities Movements Opening balance at 1 October Charged / (credited) to the Income Statement Charged to equity Acquisition of subsidiaries Foreign exchange losses Adjustments in respect of prior years Closing balance at 30 September 190.1 312.8 490.6 (84.0) - 0.1 (29.7) 3.3 380.3 426.3 109.3 4.2 - (50.2) 1.0 490.6 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 77 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 25. Retirement benefit obligations (a) Information on Plans The Group operates a number of defined benefit plans to provide benefits for employees and their dependants on retirement, disability or death. In the Americas (comprising Canada, USA and Mexico), several defined benefit pension plans are in operation. Contributions to the plans are determined by actuarial valuation using the projected unit credit method. The Company is the sponsoring employer of the Incitec Pivot Employees Superannuation Fund, a defined benefit superannuation fund which consists of a defined contribution section of membership as well as a defined benefit section. The Fund also pays pensions to a number of pensioners. The key assumptions and amounts recognised in the Income Statement and Statement of Financial Position are set out below. (b) Reconciliation of the present value of the defined benefit obligation Consolidated Present value of defined benefit obligations at beginning of the year Current service cost Past service benefit Interest cost Actuarial losses Contributions by plan participants Benefits paid Foreign exchange differences on foreign plans Present value of defined benefit obligations at end of the year (c) Reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year Expected return on plan assets Actuarial gains / (losses) Employer contributions Contributions by plan participants Benefits paid Foreign exchange differences on foreign plans Fair value of plan assets at end of the year (d) Reconciliation of assets and liabilities recognised in the Statement of Financial Position Present value of funded defined benefit obligations at end of year Tax provision Total value of funded defined benefit obligations at end of year Fair value of plan assets at end of year Net liability recognised in the Statement of Financial Position at end of year (e) Expense recognised in Income Statement Current service cost Past service benefit Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Expense recognised in Income Statement Notes 2010 $mill 288.4 7.5 (1.3) 16.2 20.1 1.2 (22.3) (22.2) 287.6 196.8 14.4 3.2 12.3 1.2 (22.3) (13.3) 192.3 2009 $mill 287.6 7.5 (1.0) 17.5 16.1 1.5 (24.8) (16.0) 288.4 220.9 16.1 (17.3) 9.8 1.5 (24.7) (9.5) 196.8 286.9 0.7 287.6 (192.3) 95.3 287.6 0.8 288.4 (196.8) 91.6 7.5 (1.3) 16.2 (14.4) 8.0 7.5 (1.0) 17.5 (16.1) 7.9 (5) 78 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 25. Retirement benefit obligations (continued) (f) Amounts recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income Actuarial losses (before income tax) (g) Cumulative amount recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income Cumulative amount of actuarial losses (h) Plan assets The percentage invested in each asset class at the reporting date: Equities Fixed Interest Securities Property Other (i) Fair value of plan assets The fair value of plan assets includes no amounts relating to: - any of the Group's own financial instruments - any property occupied by, or other assets used by, the Group (j) Expected rate of return on plan assets Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 16.9 33.3 85.6 68.7 60% 28% 8% 4% 61% 25% 6% 8% The overall expected rate of return on assets assumption is determined by weighting the expected long-term rate of return for each asset class by the target allocation of assets to each class. The rates of return used for each class are net of investment tax and investment fees. (k) Actual return on plan assets Actual return on plan assets (l) Principal actuarial assumptions at the reporting date Discount rate (net of tax) Expected rate of return on plan assets Future salary increases Medical cost trend rate Future inflation (m) Expected contributions Expected contributions in year ending 30 September 2011 Expected employer contributions Expected contribution by plan participants (n) Historical information 10.4 (1.3) 4.5% - 8.0% 4.0% - 8.0% 6.0% - 8.0% 5.6% - 8.0% 2.0% - 5.0% 2.0% - 5.0% 4.0% - 8.0% 5.0% - 8.5% 2.5% - 2.8% 2.1% - 4.0% 9.6 0.6 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Present value of defined benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets (Surplus) / Deficit in plan Experience adjustment - plan liabilities Experience adjustment - plan assets 287.6 (192.3) 95.3 (2.2) 3.0 288.4 (196.8) 91.6 3.7 (2.9) 287.7 (220.9) 66.8 7.9 (10.9) 77.2 (79.9) (2.7) (4.4) 3.7 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 75.1 (72.2) 2.9 (2.9) 3.3 79 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 26. Issued capital Share Capital Ordinary shares authorised and issued - 1,628,730,107 (2009: 1,612,536,335 ) (1) Movements in issued and fully paid ordinary shares of the Company during the financial year: Date Details Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 3,265.9 3,265.9 3,217.8 3,217.8 Number of Shares $mill 30 September 2009 Balance at the end of the previous financial year 1,612,536,335 3,217.8 Shares issued during the period 18 December 2009 Shares issued (Dividend Reinvestment Plan) 18 December 2009 Shares issued (Underwriter issue) 17 March 2010 6 July 2010 Shares issued (Dividend Reinvestment Plan) Shares issued (Dividend Reinvestment Plan) 4,878,436 7,475,676 42,531 3,797,129 14.5 22.5 0.1 11.0 30 September 2010 Balance at the end of the financial year 1,628,730,107 3,265.9 (1) Ordinary shares authorised and issued have no par value. Terms and conditions Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends from time to time and are entitled to one vote per share at shareholders’ meetings. Shares issued during financial year On 18 December 2009, 4,878,436 ordinary shares ($14.5m) were issued to Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP) participants and 7,475,676 ($22.5m) to the underwriter to fund the 2009 final dividend payment. On 17 March 2010, 42,531 ordinary shares ($0.1m) were issued to Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP) participants in respect of the 2009 final dividend payment. On 6 July 2010, 3,797,129 ordinary shares ($11.0m) were issued to Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP) participants for the 2010 interim dividend payment. 80 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 27. Dividends Dividends paid or declared in respect of the year ended 30 September were: Ordinary Shares Final dividend of 19.5 cents per share, fully franked at 30%, paid 14 November 2008 Interim dividend of 2.1 cents per share(1), fully franked at 30%, paid 7 July 2009 Final dividend of 2.3 cents per share(1), unfranked, paid 18 December 2009 Interim dividend of 1.8 cents per share(2), unfranked, paid 6 July 2010 Total ordinary share dividends Company 2010 $mill 2009 $mill - - 37.1 29.3 66.4 237.4 33.6 - - 271.0 Subsequent event Since the end of the financial year, the directors have determined to pay the following dividend: - Final dividend of 6 cents per share, unfranked, to be paid on 17 December 2010. The total dividend payment will be $97.7m. Ordinary shares The financial effect of this dividend has not been recognised in the Financial Report and will be recognised in subsequent financial reports. (1) Dividends were paid under a Dividend Reinvestment Plan which was fully underwritten. (2) The interim dividend was paid $18.3m in cash and $11.0m by a Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Franking credits Franking credits available to shareholders of the Group amount to $0.2m (2009: $15.1m negative) at the 30% (2009: 30%) corporate tax rate. Accordingly, the final dividend for 2010 is unfranked. Franking credits that will arise from payment of income tax in the year ending 30 September 2010 have been factored into the franking account balance. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 81 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 28. Business combination Acquisition of Nitromak DNX Kimya Sanayii Anonim Sirketi (a) Summary of acquisition On 31 July 2010, the Group acquired the remaining 50.0% equity in the Turkish joint venture Nitromak DNX Kimya Sanayii Anonim Sirketi (“Nitromak”) for $97.1m, excluding transaction costs. Nitromak manufactures and sells industrial explosives and related products and services to the mining, quarrying and construction industries. (b) Purchase consideration Consideration paid, satisfied in cash Less cash acquired Total consideration transferred Fair value of equity interest in Nitromak held before the business combination Total consideration Acquisition-related costs (c) Assets and liabilities acquired The assets and liabilities arising from the acquisition are as follows: Consolidated 2010 $mill 99.3 (2.2) 97.1 74.8 171.9 0.7 Acquiree's net assets at the acquisition date Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories Other investments Property, plant and equipment Intangibles - Customer contracts - Brand name - Other Trade payables Other liabilities Tax liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Provisions Interest bearing liabilities Net identifiable assets and liabilities Less consideration Goodwill on acquisition recognised Nitromak Pre- acquisition Carrying Amounts $mill Initial Fair Value Adjustments Provisional Fair Value $mill $mill 2.2 29.3 9.1 0.1 9.9 - - 0.2 (12.8) (4.0) (1.5) (0.1) (1.5) (12.4) 18.5 - (1.0) 1.2 (0.1) (1.7) 1.1 4.0 - - - - - (0.1) - 3.4 2.2 28.3 10.3 - 8.2 1.1 4.0 0.2 (12.8) (4.0) (1.5) (0.1) (1.6) (12.4) 21.9 171.9 150.0 The Group recognised a net $19.0m gain ($33.4m gain net of $14.4m of foreign exchange loss) as a result of measuring at fair value its 50% equity interest in Nitromak held before the business combination. The gain is included in other income in the Group’s Income Statement (and as an individually material item in Note 6) for the year ending 30 September 2010. The goodwill recognised on the acquisition is mainly attributable to the skills and technical talent of the acquiree’s workforce and the synergies expected to be achieved from integrating the acquiree into the Group’s existing business. 82 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 29. Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash inflow from operating activities Reconciliation of cash Cash at the end of the financial year as shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is reconciled to the related items in the Statement of Financial Position as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Reconciliation of profit for the financial year to net cash flows from operating activities Profit / (loss) for the financial year Depreciation and amortisation Write-down of property, plant and equipment Profit on share equity accounted investments Net (profit) / loss on sale of property, plant and equipment Impairment of goodwill Non-cash share based payment transactions Unwinding of discount on provisions Changes in assets and liabilities (increase) / decrease in receivables and other assets (increase) / decrease in inventories (increase) / decrease in deferred tax assets increase / (decrease) in deferred tax liabilities increase / (decrease) in net interest payable increase / (decrease) in payables and provisions increase / (decrease) in income taxes payable Net cash flows from operating activities Consolidated Restated 2009 $mill 2010 $mill Notes (10) 48.7 48.7 125.2 125.2 (5) (5) (16) (4) (5) 412.2 139.0 0.7 (30.5) (4.3) - 3.9 13.8 (164.1) 69.1 126.7 (93.1) (17.9) 25.5 47.9 528.9 (221.4) 170.5 80.4 (25.0) (13.3) 490.6 3.8 9.1 209.8 293.1 10.6 (21.6) 6.3 (427.0) (228.5) 337.4 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 83 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 30. Commitments a) Capital expenditure commitments Capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment contracted but not provided for and payable: no later than one year later than one, no later than five years Share of capital expenditure commitments of the joint venture operation: no later than one year b) Lease commitments Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 331.2 0.6 331.8 89.2 23.1 112.3 - 331.8 2.4 114.7 Non-cancellable operating lease commitments comprise a number of operating arrangements for the provision of certain equipment and property. These leases have varying durations and expiry dates. The future minimum rental commitments are as follows: no later than one year later than one, no later than five years later than five years 50.4 96.5 56.7 203.6 54.6 111.0 56.5 222.1 Finance lease commitments comprise a number of finance arrangements for the provision of certain equipment. These leases have varying durations and expiry dates. The future minimum rental commitments are as follows: no later than one year later than one, no later than five years Present value of minimum lease payments provided for as a liability 1.6 0.3 1.9 2.2 3.7 5.9 c) Other expenditure commitments Commitments for payments to suppliers under long-term executory contracts existing at balance date but not recognised as payable include: no later than one year later than one, no later than five years later than five years 94.1 178.9 168.4 441.4 61.0 222.6 147.4 431.0 84 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 31. Contingent liabilities The following contingent liabilities are generally considered remote. However the directors consider they should be disclosed. The directors are of the opinion that provisions are not required. Contracts, claims, guarantees and warranties (cid:1) Under a Deed of Cross Guarantee dated 30 September 2008, entered into in accordance with ASIC Class Order 98/1418 (as amended), each company which is party to the Deed has covenanted with the Trustee (or the Alternative Trustee as applicable) of the Deed to guarantee the payment of any debts of the other companies which are party to the Deed which might arise on the winding up of those companies. The entities which are party to the Deed are disclosed in the commentary to Note 37, Investments in controlled entities. Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement for the closed group are shown in Note 38, Deed of Cross Guarantee. The Group has entered into various long-term supply contracts. For some contracts, minimum charges are payable regardless of the level of operations, but in all cases the level of operations are expected to remain above those that would trigger minimum payments. There are a number of legal claims and exposures, which arise from the ordinary course of business. There is significant uncertainty as to whether a future liability will arise in respect of these items. The amount of liability, if any, which may arise cannot be reliably measured at this time. In the opinion of the directors, any further information about these matters would be prejudicial to the interests of the Group. There are guarantees relating to certain leases of property, plant and equipment and other agreements arising in the ordinary course of business. Contracts of sale covering companies and businesses, which were divested in current and prior years include normal commercial warranties and indemnities to the purchasers. The Group is not aware of any material exposure under these warranties and indemnities. From time to time, the Group is subject to claims for damages arising from products and services supplied by the Group in the normal course of business. Controlled entities have received advice of claims relating to alleged failure to supply products and services suitable for particular applications. The claims in the entities concerned are considered to be either immaterial or the entity is defending the claim with no expected financial disadvantage. No specific disclosure is considered necessary. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) Environmental I General The Group has identified a number of sites as requiring environmental clean up and review. Appropriate implementation of clean up requirements is ongoing. In accordance with current accounting policy (see Note 1 (xvii)), provisions have been created for all known environmental liabilities that can be reliably estimated. While the directors believe that, based upon current information, the current provisions are appropriate, there can be no assurance that new information or regulatory requirements with respect to known sites or the identification of new remedial obligations at other sites will not require additional future provisions for environmental remediation and such provisions could be material. II Environmental matters subject to voluntary requirements with regulatory authority For sites where the requirements have been assessed and are capable of reliable measurement, estimated regulatory and remediation costs have been capitalised, expensed as incurred or provided for in accordance with the accounting policy included in Note 1 (xvii). Taxation Consistent with other companies of the size of Incitec Pivot, the Group is subject to periodic information requests, investigations and audit activities by the Australian Taxation Office. Provisions for such matters will be recognised if a present obligation in relation to a taxation liability exists which can be reliably estimated. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 85 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 32. Financial risk management Overview The Group has exposure to the following financial risks: • Market risk (foreign exchange, interest rate, equity price and commodity risk) • Liquidity risk • Credit risk This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, as well as the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing these risks. The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group’s risk management framework. The Board established the Board Audit and Risk Management Committee (BARMC), which is responsible for, amongst other things, the monitoring of the Group’s risk management plans. The BARMC reports regularly to the Board of Directors on its activities. The Group’s financial risk management policies establish a framework for identifying, analysing and managing the financial risks faced by the Group. These policies set appropriate financial risk limits and controls, identify permitted derivative instruments and provide guidance on how financial risks and adherence to limits are to be monitored and reported. Financial risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to ensure they remain appropriate given changes in market conditions and/or the Group’s activities. The BARMC oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group. The BARMC is assisted in its oversight role by the Group’s internal auditors. The internal auditors undertake both regular and ad hoc reviews of risk management controls and procedures, the results of which are reported to the BARMC. (a) Market risk Market risk is the risk that changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates will affect the Group’s income, cash flows and/or value of its holdings of derivative instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return on risk. To achieve this objective an “insurance based” approach is often taken whereby the Group will pay a premium to limit the impact of unfavourable market movements while allowing at least partial participation in favourable movements. For some market risks, primarily commodity price risks, there is either no specific derivative market available or the derivative market is illiquid and expensive. In some cases, derivative markets exist but contain unacceptable levels of basis risk (the risk that the change in price of a hedge may not match the change in price of the item it hedges). In these circumstances, the Group chooses not to hedge using derivatives. Further details of the Group’s financial risk management structures are outlined below, including information as to whether hedge accounting has been applied. i. Foreign exchange risk - transactional The Group is exposed to foreign exchange movements on sales and purchases denominated, either directly or indirectly, in foreign currency (primarily in United States dollars). Where these exposures are significant and cannot be eliminated by varying contract terms or other business arrangements, formal hedging strategies are implemented within Board approved policy. The formal hedging strategies involve collating and consolidating exposure levels centrally by Treasury, and hedging specific transactions, after taking into account offsetting exposures, by entering into derivative contracts with highly rated financial institutions. The Group’s principal transactional foreign exchange risks can be split into two main categories: short term contractual exposures and longer term forecast exposures. 86 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 32. Financial risk management (continued) (a) Market risk (continued) i. Foreign exchange risk – transactional (continued) Short term contractual exposures: As the Group both imports and exports fertilisers and raw materials in foreign currency, its profitability is impacted by foreign exchange movements. Timing differences between receipts and payments of foreign currency are managed using foreign exchange swaps. Where there is a net excess or shortfall of foreign currency, forward foreign exchange contracts are taken out to hedge those exposures. The Group applies hedge accounting for these derivatives. The table below shows the outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts as at 30 September 2010: Term Weighted average strike rate AUD mill AUD mill Forward FX contract Buy USD / Sell AUD Buy AUD / Sell USD Buy EUR / Sell AUD Buy GBP / Sell AUD 2010 0.9020 0.9576 0.6822 0.5988 2009 2010 0.7093 94.9 2009 186.1 - 1.9 - - 1.6 - - 0.2 - Longer term forecast exposures: The profitability of Southern Cross International and Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, is impacted by foreign exchange movement due to the manufacturing inputs (gas, electricity, labour) being denominated in Australian dollars, whilst the manufactured outputs (phosphate based fertilisers, urea and ammonia) are sold either in United States dollars or in Australian dollars based on an import parity formula impacted by the rate of exchange. The amount of anticipated future sales is forecast in light of plant capacities, current conditions in both domestic and international agricultural and industrial markets, commitments from customers and historical seasonal impacts. Policies approved by the Board of Directors limit the percentage of forecast sales that can be hedged with the percentage reducing as the time horizon increases. The Group has entered into a series of Foreign Exchange Contracts (“FEC”) to Sell USD / Buy AUD, to protect a portion of next year’s forecast exposure. The market value of these FEC’s are recorded in the Statement of Financial Position at year end. Any movement in the market value from contract price to year end price is recorded in the Cashflow Hedge Reserve in the Statement of Financial Position. Favourable outcomes on the hedge will occur when the AUD appreciates. As FEC contracts do not offer participation when the AUD depreciates, options and collars contracts are entered into occasionally to allow some participation. The table below summarises the FEC and foreign currency option contracts taken out to hedge sales of the output of Southern Cross International and Incitec Pivot Fertilisers: Term Buy AUD / Sell USD Buy USD / Sell CAD Buy EUR / Sell AUD Average rate options not later than one year 2010 0.8719 1.0367 0.7100 - USD/AUD exercise price Weighted average AUD/USD strike rate 2009 2010 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - Contract amounts AUD mill 2009 - - - 2010 462.2 50.0 0.4 0.8400 - 238.1 From time to time, the Group may look to reduce premium costs by transacting collars or selling floors against existing bought positions. Board approved policies prevent the Group from selling naked options. No collars or sold floor positions existed at year end. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 87 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 32. Financial risk management (continued) (a) Market risk (continued) i. Foreign exchange risk – transactional (continued) The following sensitivity is based on the transactional foreign currency risk exposures in existence at the reporting date and is calculated based on name plate capacity, average acheived Fertiliser selling prices and exchange rates in 2010. Foreign Exchange Sensitivity – Transactional USD Fertilser sales from Australian plants ii. Foreign exchange risk – translational USD + 1c AUD mill USD - 1c AUD mill 2010 (7.2) 2010 7.4 The Group has foreign operations with non-AUD functional currencies and is therefore exposed to translation risk resulting from foreign exchange movements which impact on the AUD equivalent value of the foreign operations. The Group manages the impact of the translation risk by a combination of borrowing in the same currency as the net foreign assets and by using cross currency swaps to create ‘synthetic’ foreign currency debt. The cross currency swaps pay and receive floating rates of interest with quarterly or monthly rate resets. The borrowings are generally held within the foreign subsidiaries resulting in a reduction in the overall net assets that are translated. The translation movement of the Group’s net assets are recognised within the foreign currency translation reserve. The table below summarises the cross currency swaps. Term Receive AUD / Pay USD mill 2010 2009 not later than one year later than one year, no later than five years AUD 488.3 / USD 432.0 AUD 484.2 / USD 412.4 AUD 407.7 / USD 375.0 AUD 1,279.8 / USD 999.5 The following sensitivity is based on the translational foreign currency risk exposures in existence at the reporting date and is calculated based on 2010 USD denominated earnings before interest and tax at the average 2010 translation exchange rate. Foreign Exchange Sensitivity – Translational North American earnings before interest and tax iii. Interest rate risk USD + 1c AUD mill USD - 1c AUD mill 2010 (1.8) 2010 1.8 The Group is exposed to interest rate risk on outstanding interest bearing liabilities and investments. The mix of floating and fixed rate debt is managed within policies determined by the Board of Directors using approved derivative instruments. The Group’s interest rate risk arises from long term borrowings in Australian and United States dollars. Out of the AUD1,145.8m of Interest Bearing Liabilities at the reporting date, AUD84.2m had a floating interest rate. Term Contract amounts Fixed Rate 0-5 years 5-7 years 7-15 years 2010 - - - 2009 - USD100.0m USD400.0m 2010 - - - 2009 - 3.29% 3.74% In the year ended 30 September 2009, in anticipation of the US$800.0m 10 year fixed rate bond raising in December 2009, the Group entered into a series of forward starting Treasury Locks to protect itself against the risk that base USD interest rates might increase. These instruments were subsequently closed out on completion of the bond issuance. 88 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 32. Financial risk management (continued) (a) Market risk (continued) iii. Interest rate risk (continued) The following sensitivity analysis is based on the interest rate risk exposures in existence at the reporting date and is calculated based on the variable interest rate borrowings balance at 30 September 2010 and the average variable interest rate during the 2010 year. Interest Rate Sensitivity Current and non-current borrowings with variable interest rates + 1% AUD mill - 1% AUD mill 2010 (0.5) 2010 0.5 iv. Commodity risk The Group is exposed to changes in commodity prices by virtue of its operations. Where possible, the Group manages some of that risk by negotiating appropriate contractual terms with its suppliers and customers. Natural gas represents a significant raw material cost for the Group’s ammonia and nitrogen based manufacturing. In order to manage the price risk associated with natural gas in Australia, the Group has entered into long term fixed price contracts for the supply of gas. In the United States, the Group aims, where possible, to mitigate some of its exposure to natural gas price risk by entering into contracts with its customers which pass on the risk of natural gas price movements. For longer term contracts that do not include a gas price pass through clause, the Group will typically manage its gas price risk by entering into a fixed price derivative that matches the term of the customer contract (see the table below for a list of contracts outstanding as at 30 September 2010). On occasion the Group has used fixed price derivatives during the year for managing its short term gas price risk for periods shorter than one year. The table below summarises the fixed price derivatives outstanding as at 30 September 2010: Contract Contract Contract Contract Contract Contract Contract Months hedged 10 15 3 12 3 3 26 Monthly volume (mmbtu) 100,000 45,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 Fixed rate USD 7.78 6.12 5.12 4.29 5.98 5.41 5.40 The Group is exposed to price volatility on the commodities it sells. These exposures can be categorised into three main areas: ammonium nitrate, ammonium phosphate and urea. The Group aims to manage its price risk exposure to ammonium nitrate by entering into long term contracts with its customers with fixed sales prices that are adjusted for changes to input costs such as natural gas and for movements in CPI. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 89 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 32. Financial risk management (continued) (a) Market risk (continued) iv. Commodity risk (continued) The market for ammonium phosphates and urea is generally based on spot prices with minimal ability to contract for longer terms. For these commodities, no deep and liquid derivative market is available. The following table details the Group’s profit sensitivity to price movements for these commodities, based on plant name plate capacity. Fertiliser Price Sensitivity Middle East Granular Urea (MEGU) FOB/t Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) Tampa FOB/t + USD10 AUD mill - USD10 AUD mill Name plate Tonnes 2010 4.8 11.5 2010 (4.8) (11.5) 405,000 970,000 v. Equity price risk Refer to Note 14. (b) Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure that there are sufficient committed funding facilities available to meet the Group’s financial commitments in a timely manner. The Group’s forecast liquidity requirements are continually reassessed based on regular forecasting of capital requirements including extensive stress testing of critical assumptions such as input costs, sales prices, production volumes, exchange rates and capital expenditure. Typically, the Group holds a minimum liquidity buffer of at least AUD500.0m in undrawn committed funding at all times to meet any unforeseen cashflow requirements including unplanned reduction in revenue, business disruption and unplanned capital expenditure. This excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot reasonably be predicted, such as natural disasters. The Group maintains the following committed lines of credit: (cid:1) An unsecured Syndicated facility agreement of AUD1,080.0m for 3 years, maturing October 2011. This is a multi-currency facility drawable in AUD and USD with interest payable at BBSY/LIBOR plus a margin. This facility is revolving in nature whereby repayment can be redrawn at the Group’s discretion. A USD800.0m 10 year bond completed in the US 144A / Regulation S debt capital market. The bond is denominated in USD, has a fixed rate semi-annual coupon of 6.00% and matures in December 2019. A participation facility of AUD199.7m (amortising) maturing in June 2013, the carrying amount of the facility is secured against certain assets operated by Southern Cross Fertilisers Pty Ltd. The facility is denominated in AUD and has a fixed nominal interest rate of 8.93% for the term of the facility. A second participation facility of AUD55.3m (amortising) maturing in September 2014, the carrying amount of the facility is secured against certain assets operated by Southern Cross Fertilisers Pty Ltd. The facility is denominated in AUD and has a fixed nominal interest rate of 9.63% for the term of the facility. Secured Inventory Finance Facility of USD60.0m drawable in AUD and USD for 1 year. Interest is payable at a base rate plus a margin. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) At year end, the Group has committed undrawn lines of AUD1,076.9m and cash of AUD48.7m. 90 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 32. Financial risk management (continued) (b) Liquidity risk (continued) Capital risk management The key objectives of the Group when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern and maintain optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. “Capital” is considered to be all sources of funding, whether debt or equity. Management also aims to maintain a capital and funding structure that optimises the cost of capital available to the Group over the long term. The key objectives include: (cid:1) Maintaining an investment grade credit profile and the requisite financial metrics; (cid:1) Securing access to diversified sources of debt funding with a spread of maturity dates and sufficient undrawn committed facility capacity; and Optimising over the long term, and to the extent practicable, the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to reduce the cost of capital to the Group while maintaining financial flexibility. (cid:1) In order to optimise the capital structure, management may alter the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares, vary discretionary capital expenditure, draw down additional debt or sell assets to reduce debt in line with the strategic objectives and operating plans of the Group. Various financial ratios and internal targets are assessed and reported to the Board on a regular basis by management to monitor and support the key objectives set out above. These ratios and targets include: (cid:1) Gearing ratio, Gross debt to Earning Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) and interest cover. Debt covenants relating to the Syndicated facility (AUD1,080.0m) have been measured and are within the debt covenant targets for the year ended 30 September 2010. (c) Credit risk Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The major exposure to credit risk arises from trade receivables, which have been recognised in the Statement of Financial Position net of any impairment losses, and from derivative financial instruments. Trade and other receivables The Group’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. The demographics of the Group’s customer base, including the default risk of the industry and country in which customers currently operate, have an influence on credit risk. Credit risk on sales to overseas customers is usually negated by way of entering into irrevocable letters of credit with financial institutions or by asking customers to pay in advance. The Group has a credit policy under which each new customer is analysed individually for creditworthiness before the Group enters into any sales transaction on an open credit account with standard payment, delivery terms and conditions of sale. The creditworthiness review includes analysing the financial information provided by the customer, where applicable, and reports from external ratings agencies. Based on this analysis, credit limits are established for each customer, which represents the projected highest level of exposure, at any one point in time, which a customer may reach. These limits are reviewed annually for all customers with a limit greater than AUD0.5m and on an as needs basis if an increase is required. Customers that fail to meet the Group’s benchmark creditworthiness or who are in breach of their credit limits, may transact only on a “Cash Before Delivery” basis. Goods are generally sold without any retention to title clauses except where as part of the creditworthiness reviews, it is recommended to retain security to protect either in full or part the level of debt the Group will be exposed to at any one time. The Group establishes an allowance for impairment that represents its estimate of probable losses in respect of trade and other receivables. Financial Instruments The Group limits its exposure to credit risk created by investing in financial instruments by only investing in liquid securities and only with counterparties that have a credit rating of at least BBB+. In practice, financial instruments are usually dealt with financial institutions with a stronger rating than BBB+. Currently all financial instruments held are with financial institutions with a long term rating of A or better. The credit risk exposure arising from derivative financial instruments is the sum of all contracts with a fair value. As at 30 September 2010, the sum of all contracts with a positive fair value was AUD110.1m (2009: AUD144.4m). Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 91 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 33. Financial instruments (a) Foreign exchange risk The Group’s exposure to foreign exchange risk at balance date was: Consolidated Trade receivables Trade payables Gross Statement of Financial Position exposure Forward exchange contracts Net exposure 2010 USD mill 2009 USD mill 6.9 76.9 5.0 113.1 70.0 108.1 76.9 131.9 (6.9) (23.8) The following significant exchange rates applied during the year: Average rate 2010 Balance date spot rate 2010 Average rate 2009 Balance date spot rate 2009 USD 0.9009 0.9689 0.7321 0.8744 (b) Interest rate risk At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest bearing financial instruments were: Variable rate instruments - Financial liabilities Fixed rate instruments - Financial liabilities Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 84.2 1,348.5 1,061.6 240.1 Cash flow sensitivities for variable rate instruments A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased / decreased equity and profit and loss by AUD0.8m assuming all the variables were held constant in particular foreign exchange rates. (c) Credit risk The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was: Trade receivables Other receivables Cash and cash equivalents Forward exchange contracts Cross currency swaps Option contracts 92 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Consolidated 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 438.6 20.5 48.7 20.1 90.0 - 617.9 275.3 79.8 125.2 - 147.6 12.6 640.5 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 33. Financial instruments (continued) (c) Credit risk (continued) The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables at the reporting date by country was: Australia India Europe USA Canada Asia Turkey Other Consolidated 2010 $mill 147.3 91.0 8.9 69.0 65.3 22.3 28.5 6.3 438.6 2009 $mill 127.4 - 0.9 73.9 55.8 13.0 - 4.3 275.3 The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables at the reporting date by type of customers was: Wholesale customer End user customer Consolidated 2010 $mill 221.0 217.6 438.6 2009 $mill 66.2 209.1 275.3 As at the end of September 2010 and September 2009, the Group had no individual debtor’s balance outstanding in excess of 10% of the total of the trade receivable balance. Impairment losses The ageing of trade receivables at the reporting date was: Consolidated Current Past due 0 - 30 days Past due 31 - 120 days Total Gross 2010 $mill Impairment Gross 2009 2010 $mill $mill Impairment 2009 $mill 392.4 27.0 24.8 444.2 - - 5.6 5.6 212.4 30.2 39.5 282.1 The movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of trade receivables during the year was as follows: Balance at 1 October Net impairment losses recognised / (released) Write-offs recognised during the year Foreign exchange movements Balance at 30 September (11) Notes Consolidated 2010 $mill 6.8 0.4 (1.7) 0.1 5.6 Based on past experience, the Group believes that no impairment allowance is necessary in respect of trade receivables that are not past due. The allowance accounts in respect of trade receivables are used to record impairment losses unless the Group is satisfied that no recovery of the amount owing is possible. At that point the amount considered irrecoverable is written off against the financial asset directly. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 93 - - 6.8 6.8 2009 $mill 13.3 (0.4) (6.0) (0.1) 6.8 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 33. Financial instruments (continued) (d) Liquidity risk – financial liabilities The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including interest payments and excluding the impact of netting payments. Consolidated 30 September 2010 Non-derivative financial liabilities Interest bearing liabilities Interest payments Derivative financial liabilities Forward commodity contracts Total 30 September 2009 Non-derivative financial liabilities Interest bearing liabilities Derivative financial liabilities Interest rate contracts Total Carrying Contractual cash flows (1) amount $mill $mill 6 months 6 - 12 1 - 2 2 - 5 or less (1) months (1) years (1) years (1) more than 5 years (1) $mill $mill $mill $mill $mill 1,145.8 - 1,145.8 538.0 73.3 51.0 1.7 1,147.5 1.7 1,685.5 0.8 125.1 36.1 42.7 0.6 79.4 115.8 82.7 115.9 170.0 804.7 191.6 0.3 198.8 - 285.9 - 996.3 1,588.6 1,588.6 90.2 342.0 1,023.8 132.6 12.9 1,601.5 12.9 1,601.5 12.9 103.1 - 342.0 - 1,023.8 - 132.6 - - - (1) Contractual cash flows are based on exchange rates prevailing at year end. Any subsequent movement in exchange rates will impact the cash flow required to settle the obligations where those obligations are in a foreign currency. (e) Liquidity risk – cash flow hedges Cash flow hedges are mainly used to mitigate the Group’s exposure to commodity price risk, foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk. Forward commodity contracts are entered into to manage the price risk associated with the purchase of natural gas which is a key raw material input to the production of ammonia and ammonium nitrate. Forward currency risk associated with sales and purchases denominated in foreign currency is managed by entering into forward contracts and options. Interest rate risk is managed by entering into interest rate contracts in order to limit the exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The following table indicates the periods in which the cash-flows associated with derivatives that are cash flow hedges are expected to occur and expected to impact the Income Statement: Consolidated 30 September 2010 Cross currency swaps, forward exchange and commodity contracts - Assets - Liabilities Total 30 September 2009 Option, interest contracts and cross currency swaps - Assets - Liabilities Total Carrying amount $mill Expected cash flows $mill 6 months or less $mill 6 - 12 months $mill 1 - 2 years $mill 2 - 5 years $mill 110.1 1.7 108.4 160.2 12.9 147.3 110.1 1.7 108.4 36.0 0.8 35.2 45.4 0.6 44.8 21.0 0.3 20.7 7.7 - 7.7 160.2 12.9 147.3 (5.9) 12.9 (18.8) 30.2 - 30.2 105.1 - 105.1 30.8 - 30.8 more than 5 years $mill - - - - - - 94 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 33. Financial instruments (continued) (f) Fair values The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with the carrying amounts shown in the balance sheet, are as follows: Consolidated Available for sale financial assets Trade and other receivables Cash and cash equivalents Cross currency swaps Option and commodity contracts Forward exchange contracts Trade and other payables Financial liabilities Interest rate contracts Total Basis for determining fair value Carrying amount 2010 $mill 30.2 459.1 48.7 90.0 (1.7) 20.1 (1,075.4) (1,145.8) - (1,574.8) Fair value 2010 $mill 30.2 459.1 48.7 90.0 (1.7) 20.1 (1,075.4) (1,173.6) - (1,602.6) Carrying amount 2009 $mill 46.9 355.1 125.2 147.6 12.6 - (1,063.3) (1,588.6) (12.9) (1,977.4) Fair value 2009 $mill 46.9 355.1 125.2 147.6 12.6 - (1,063.3) (1,588.6) (12.9) (1,977.4) The following summarises the significant methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair values of financial instruments reflected in the table above. Investments in equity securities i. The fair value of financial assets available for sale is determined based on the quoted bid price at the reporting date. ii. Derivatives The fair value of forward exchange contracts is based on their listed market price if available. If a listed market price is not available, then fair value is estimated by discounting the difference between the contractual forward price and the current forward price. The fair value of commodity contracts is based on their listed market price as quoted on the NYMEX if available and if a listed market price is not available, then fair value is estimated by discounting the difference between the contractual price and current market price. The fair value of interest rate contracts is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cashflows. iii. Trade and other receivables & Trade and other payables The fair value of trade and other receivables, and trade and other payables are estimated as the present value of future cash flows, discounted at the market rate of interest at the reporting date. iv. Financial liabilities designated at Fair value through the Income Statement Fair value is calculated based on the present value of future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at the market rate of interest at the reporting date. Method of discounting In calculating the fair values of financial instruments, the present value of all cash flows greater than 1 year are discounted. Fair Value Hierarchy The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value by valuation method. The different levels have been defined as follows: - - Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. - Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). 30 September 2010 Listed equity securities Derivative financial assets Derivative financial liabilities Level 1 $mill 30.2 - 30.2 - - Level 2 $mill - 110.1 110.1 1.7 1.7 Level 3 $mill - - - - - 95 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 34. Related party disclosures Subsidiaries Interest in subsidiaries is set out in Note 37. Jointly controlled entities Interest in jointly controlled entities is set out in Note 16. Key management personnel Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in Note 35. Transactions with related parties are as follows: Consolidated Sales of goods / services Purchase of goods / services Management fees / royalties Interest income Interest expense Dividend income Jointly controlled entities (1) Notes (4) (5) (16) 2010 $mill 219.0 (4.9) 23.8 2.5 (0.3) 17.1 2009 $mill 242.6 (30.7) 22.9 1.6 (0.5) 5.2 (1) Jointly controlled entities transactions represent amounts which do not eliminate on consolidation. Outstanding balances arising from sales / purchases of goods and services with related parties are on normal current terms and are as follows: Consolidated Amounts owing to related parties Amounts owing from related parties Jointly controlled entities Notes (20) (11) 2010 $mill 1.6 25.1 2009 $mill 0.2 19.4 96 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 35. Key management personnel disclosures (a) Key management personnel Short-term employee benefits Post-employment benefits Other long-term benefits Termination benefits Share-based payments Consolidated 2010 $000 2009 $000 14,461 304 244 1,003 1,586 17,598 8,875 284 635 168 2,093 12,055 Determination of key management personnel and detailed remuneration disclosures are provided in the Remuneration Report. (b) Loans to key management personnel In the year ended 30 September 2010, there were no loans to key management personnel and their related parties. In the year ended 30 September 2009 an unsecured bridge loan to Mr D Brinker amounting to USD257,600 was issued. The interest free bridge loan was required to be repaid in full 347 days after the issue date and was repaid in full during the year ended 30 September 2009. Interest not charged on the loan amounted to USD8,800 and the highest balance in the period was USD257,600. There were no other loans to key management personnel and their related parties in the year ended 30 September 2009. (c) Other key management personnel transactions The following transactions, entered into during the year and prior year with key management personnel, were on terms and conditions no more favourable than those available to other customers, suppliers and employees: (1) The spouse of Mr Fazzino, the Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, is a partner in the accountancy and tax firm PricewaterhouseCoopers from which the Group purchased services of $3,338,954 during the year (2009: $5,725,573). Mr Fazzino’s spouse does not directly provide these services. (2) During the year ended 30 September 2010, Mr McCallum purchased fertiliser to the value of $nil, (2009: $7,992) from the Company. The balance owing at 30 September 2010 was $nil (2009: $nil). Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 97 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 35. Key management personnel disclosures (continued) (d) Movements in shareholdings of directors and executives (1) Movements in shares in the Company The movement during the reporting period in the numbers of shares in the Company held directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person, including their related parties, is set out in the table below: Non-executive directors - Current J C Watson A D McCallum J Marlay A C Larkin G Smorgon P V Brasher (1) Non-executive directors - Former B Healey Executive directors - Current J E Fazzino Executives - Former J Segal Executives - Current F Micallef (1) K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J Whiteside G Brinkworth S Dawson (1) B Wallace (1) J Rintel S Atkinson (1) Executives - Former K Lynch (2) D Brinker P Barber Number of Shares (A) Opening balance Shares acquired Shares disposed (B) Closing balance (C) - - 100,000 - 100,000 - - 216,501 (25,000) 216,501 - 37,926 - 37,693 - - 5,000 - 5,000 100,000 74,000 26,000 216,501 156,360 85,141 37,693 233 20,000 17,693 5,000 - 5,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - Year 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 20,000 20,000 (40,000) - 2010 2009 1,845,420 1,845,420 - - 1,845,420 - - 1,845,420 2009 2,134,120 104,000 (2,238,120) - 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 2010 2009 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2009 22,520 387,600 373 671,620 429,380 797,100 428,420 528,420 300,920 524,860 - 292 - 23,429 428 57,480 117,120 117,120 22,880 - - 22,520 (298,660) 89,313 - (284,020) 387,600 - - 429,380 (367,720) 429,380 - (100,000) 328,420 - - (100,000) 428,420 - - 300,920 (223,940) 300,920 - - 292 - - - - 23,857 - - 57,480 - - 117,120 - - 117,120 - - 22,880 (53,240) 53,240 53,240 66,680 66,680 120,080 15,544 - - - 53,240 - - - 66,680 (135,624) - - - (66,680) (A) (B) (C) (1) (2) Includes fully paid ordinary shares, shares acquired under the Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) and shares, treated as options, for the purposes of remuneration which have been disclosed in section C of the Remuneration Report and the movements disclosed in this Note. Details of the ESOP are set out in Note 36, Share based payments. In the case of directors or executives who ceased their directorship or employment during the years ended 30 September 2010 and 30 September 2009, all shares were treated as disposed as at the relevant date of cessation unless otherwise stated. Shares held at 30 September 2010 includes shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10 that are treated as forfeited due to the performance criteria not being achieved. Under the plan rules, the participant remains the registered holder of the underlying shares until the loan is repaid. Refer to section C of the Remuneration Report for further details. The opening balance represents shares held as at the date of becoming a key management person. Movements are from this date. On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company. In respect of the 53,240 shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10, these were forfeited and sold on market, in accordance with the rules of the plan on Mr Lynch ceasing employment. 98 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 35. Key management personnel disclosures (continued) (d) Movements in shareholdings of directors and executives (continued) (2) Movements in shares, treated as options, over equity instruments in the Company The movement during the reporting period in the number of shares, treated as options, over shares in the Company, for the purposes of remuneration, held directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows: Executive directors - Current J E Fazzino Executive directors - Former J Segal Executives - Current F Micallef (1) K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J D Whiteside G Brinkworth (2) S Dawson (3) B Wallace (4) J Rintel (5) S Atkinson (6) Executives - Former K Lynch (7) D Brinker (8) P Barber Number of Shares (treated as options) (A) Opening balance Granted as compensation Exercised (B) Forfeited (C) Closing balance (D) 610,120 1,059,820 - - (472,880) (449,700) - 137,240 - 610,120 Year 2010 2009 2009 2,133,160 - (651,940) (361,200) 1,120,020 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 2010 2009 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2009 22,520 385,340 669,360 428,160 743,720 284,780 491,480 299,720 520,620 - - - 33,280 67,420 117,120 19,500 (298,660) (284,020) (331,840) (315,560) (217,360) (206,700) (232,300) (220,900) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (52,260) (49,700) - 22,520 - 86,680 - 385,340 - 96,320 - 428,160 - 67,420 - 284,780 - 67,420 - 299,720 - - - - - - - 33,280 - 15,160 - 67,420 - 19,500 53,240 53,240 66,680 66,680 84,280 - - - - - - - - - - (53,240) - - 53,240 - 66,680 - 66,680 (84,280) - (A) Further details of these shares which are treated as options for the purposes of remuneration have been disclosed in section C of the Remuneration Report and relate to shares allocated under the LTI plans. (B) Represents where shares, treated as options, previously granted as remuneration, were exercised (by the making of an award) during the reporting period. Awards (in the form of waivers of loans) were granted during the year ended 30 September 2010 in relation to the LTI performance plan 2006/09. (C) Represents shares, treated as options, that were forfeited and sold on market, in accordance with the rules of the relevant plan, on the participant ceasing employment. (D) Shares held at 30 September 2010 represents shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10 that are treated as forfeited due to the performance criteria not being achieved. Under the plan rules, the participant remains the registered holder of the underlying shares until the loan is repaid. Refer to section C of the Remuneration Report for further details. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 99 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 35. Key management personnel disclosures (continued) (d) Movements in shareholdings of directors and executives (continued) (2) Movements in shares, treated as options, over equity instruments in the Company (continued) (1) Mr Micallef’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10 prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer on 23 October 2009. He is not a participant in the LTI performance plan 2006/09. (2) Mr Brinkworth’s employment commenced on 17 November 2008 and he is not a participant in either the LTI performance plan 2006/09 or the LTI performance plan 2007/10. (3) Mr Dawson became a key management person on 12 November 2009 and he is not a participant in either the LTI performance plan 2006/09 or the LTI performance plan 2007/10. (4) Mr Wallace’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10 prior to him becoming a key management person on 12 November 2009. He is not a participant in the the LTI performance plan 2006/09. (5) Mr Rintel’s shares, treated as options, exercised during the financial year were granted under the LTI performance plan 2006/09 and the 15,160 shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10 prior to his appointment as an executive. (6) Mr Atkinson’s shares, treated as options, were granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10 prior to him becoming a key management person on 1 January 2010. (7) On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company. In respect of the 53,240 shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10, these were forfeited and sold on market, in accordance with the rules of the plan on Mr Lynch ceasing employment. Mr Lynch was not a participant in the LTI performance plan 2006/09. (8) On 30 November 2009, Mr Brinker ceased employment with the Group. In respect of the 66,680 shares, treated as options, granted under the LTI performance plan 2007/10, Mr Brinker continued to hold these shares subject to the existing holding lock over these shares in accordance with his employment arrangements. Mr Brinker was not a participant in the LTI performance plan 2006/09. 100 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 35. Key management personnel disclosures (continued) (d) Movements in shareholdings of directors and executives (continued) (3) Movements in rights over equity instruments in the Company The movement during the reporting period in the number of rights over shares in the Company, held directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows: Executive directors - Current J E Fazzino - Former J Segal Executives - Current F Micallef (1) K J Gleeson B C Walsh A Grace J D Whiteside G Brinkworth S Dawson (1) B Wallace (1) J Rintel S Atkinson (1) - Former K Lynch (2) D Brinker (3) P Barber Number of Rights (A) Year Opening balance Granted as compensation (B) Exercised Forfeited (C) Closing balance 2010 2009 222,482 600,000 - 222,482 - - - 822,482 - 222,482 2009 - 597,190 - (597,190) - 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 2010 2009 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2009 46,838 220,000 128,806 198,000 - 128,806 140,515 216,000 - 140,515 105,386 162,000 - 105,386 105,386 162,000 - 105,386 98,361 140,000 - 98,361 55,738 79,333 100,984 180,494 81,967 140,000 - 81,967 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 116,171 128,806 207,738 - 128,806 - - - - - - - - - 207,738 - - 266,838 - 326,806 - 128,806 - 356,515 - 140,515 - 267,386 - 105,386 - 267,386 - 105,386 - 238,361 - 98,361 - 135,071 - 281,478 - 221,967 - 81,967 - 116,171 (128,806) - (126,951) - 128,806 80,787 - 207,738 - - (A) Further details of these rights have been disclosed in section C of the Remuneration Report and relate to rights allocated under the LTI plans. (B) Represents rights which were acquired during the year by executive directors and executives while they are directors or executives of the Group pursuant to the LTI plans, details of which are set out in section C of the Remuneration Report. (C) Represents rights that were forfeited. Refer to section C of the Remuneration Report for further details. In the case of directors or executives who ceased their directorship or employment during the year, all rights, were forfeited as at the relevant date of cessation, in accordance with the plan rules, unless otherwise stated. (1) Opening balance represents rights held under the LTI performance rights plan 2008/11 as at the date of appointment as a key management person. In respect of Mr Wallace this represents entitlements granted under the LTI performance cash plan 2008/11. In respect of Mr Atkinson this also includes rights granted under the LTI performance rights plan 2009/12. (2) On 16 October 2009, Mr Lynch ceased employment with the Company. In respect of the 128,806 rights, granted under the LTI performance rights plan 2008/11, these were forfeited in accordance with the rules of the plan. Mr Lynch was not a participant in the LTI performance rights plan 2009/12. (3) On 30 November 2009, Mr Brinker ceased employment with the Group. In respect of the 207,738 entitlements, granted under the LTI performance cash plan 2008/11, a portion of Mr Brinker’s entitlements were forfeited in accordance with Mr Brinker’s employment arrangements. Mr Brinker was not a participant in either the LTI performance rights plan 2008/11 or the LTI performance rights plan 2009/12. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 101 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 36. Share based payments (a) Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIs) The LTIs are designed to link reward with the key performance drivers which underpin sustainable growth in shareholder value – which comprises both share price growth and returns to shareholders. The arrangements also support the Company’s strategy for retention and motivation of its executives and senior employees. Long Term Incentive Performance Rights Plans During the year, the Company established a LTI performance rights plan under the Long Term Incentive Performance Rights Plan rules, being the LTI performance rights plan 2009/12. The performance period for this plan is from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2012. The LTI performance rights plan 2009/12 has the same features as the LTI performance rights plan 2008/11, as follows: • Performance rights: A performance right entitles the participant to acquire an ordinary share in the Company for no consideration at a later date subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. As no share is issued until exercise, performance rights have no dividend entitlement. • Allocation: The decision to grant performance rights and to whom they will be granted is made annually by the Board. Grants of performance rights to participants are based on a percentage of the relevant participant’s fixed annual remuneration. • Conditions: The performance rights only vest if certain conditions are met, which are approved by the Board. The conditions focus on performance of Incitec Pivot and include a condition relating to duration of employment. The performance condition is based on Incitec Pivot’s Absolute Total Shareholder Return (Absolute TSR), being the percentage increase in the Company’s share price over the three year performance period plus the after tax value of dividends paid, assuming the dividends are reinvested in the Company’s shares. In setting the performance criteria at 20%, the Board considered it had established an aggressive target to promote behaviour to achieve superior performance. If, at the end of the relevant performance period Incitec Pivot’s Absolute TSR: - - - is equal to or less than 10% per annum compounded over the performance period, none of the performance rights vest; is greater than 10% and less than 20% per annum compounded over the performance period, an increasing proportion of the performance rights will vest from zero on a straight line basis; and is 20% or more per annum compounded over the performance period, all of the performance rights will vest. • Exercise period: Upon vesting of the performance rights, the participant has a two-year exercise period which commences three years after the grant date. This period may be reduced if the participant ceases to be employed by the Group. • Lapse: Performance rights will lapse if the performance conditions are not satisfied during the performance period or, in certain circumstances, if a participant ceases to be employed by the Group during the performance period. Performance rights will also lapse (and not be able to be exercised and converted into shares) if they are not exercised within five years from their grant date. Long Term Incentive Performance Cash Plans Certain employees and executives based in some jurisdictions, participate in long term incentive performance cash plans which are operated by the Group, through its offshore entities. The LTI performance cash plan 2009/12 and LTI performance cash plan 2008/11 are designed to deliver a similar benefit to executives and employees on achievement of sustained performance over the relevant three year performance period, and with similar conditions as the Long Term Incentive Performance Rights Plans. 102 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 36. Share based payments (continued) (a) Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIs) (continued) Long Term Incentive Performance Plans (loan-backed share-based) The LTI performance plan 2007/10 and the LTI performance plan 2006/09 have the following features: (cid:1) Loan backed plan: The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Incitec Pivot LTI Plan Company Pty Limited, provides to participants limited recourse loans bearing interest at the fringe benefits tax benchmark rate (currently 6.65%) for the sole purpose of acquiring shares in Incitec Pivot Limited. (cid:1) (cid:1) Shares acquired on market and held under restriction: The loans are applied to acquire shares on market which avoids dilution of other shareholdings. ASX Listing Rule 10.14 provides that no shareholder approval is required. Participants may not deal in the shares while the loan remains outstanding. Net cash dividends after personal income tax obligations are applied to reduce the loan balance throughout the term of the loan. Loan forgiveness: If, at the end of the performance period, the performance of the Company and the participant meets or exceeds the performance criteria which was set by the Board at the commencement of the performance period, part of the loan may be forgiven. The amount of the loan forgiven will be determined according to the performance achieved and will be net of fringe benefits tax. The balance of the loan must be repaid prior to any dealing in the shares, on cessation of employment, or at the latest, a sunset date which is three months after the expiry of the performance period, unless extended by the Company. The Board set the criteria for the granting of awards under each of the above LTI Plans at the beginning of the performance period covered by the LTI Plan. The criteria focus on financial performance of the Company and include a condition relating to duration of employment. The LTI performance measure is based on Absolute TSR. For the performance criteria to be satisfied in full, Absolute TSR must be at least 20% per annum compounded over the three year period. If at the end of the performance period, Absolute TSR is less than 10% per annum compounded over the three year period, no awards in the form of loan forgiveness are granted. Under both plans, any LTI award received will be used firstly to pay the interest on the loans. Of the remainder of any LTI award, part will be provided as a loan waiver amount after the Company’s FBT liability has been paid. A participant will not be eligible to receive any LTI award if the relevant TSR target is not met. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 103 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 36. Share based payments (continued) (a) Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIs) (continued) Consolidated - 2010 Grant date Expiry date Balance at the start of the year Granted during the year Exercised during the year Forfeited during the year Balance at the end of the year Vested and exerciseable at the end of the year Number Number Number Number Number Number Shares treated as options Exercise price LTI 2006/09 LTI 2007/10 01 Dec 06 30 Sep 09 12 Nov 07 30 Sep 10 Total - Shares treated as options Weighted average exercise price $1.21 $4.41 4,176,600 1,304,000 5,480,600 - - - (4,176,600) - - (1,304,000) (4,176,600) (1,304,000) - - - - - - $1.97 $0.00 $1.21 $4.41 $0.00 $0.00 Performance Rights LTI Rights - 2008/11 LTI Cash - 2008/11 LTI Rights - 2009/12 LTI Cash - 2009/12 Total - Performance rights Weighted average fair value Consolidated - 2009 Shares treated as options Retention award - Mr Segal LTI 2006/08 LTI 2006/09 LTI 2007/10 Total - Shares treated as options Weighted average exercise price Fair Value (1) 19 Dec 08 19 Dec 08 16 Dec 09 16 Dec 09 30 Sep 11 30 Sep 11 30 Sep 12 30 Sep 12 $0.30 $0.13 $1.60 $1.60 2,389,353 1,148,260 - - - - 5,388,742 312,039 3,537,613 5,700,781 - - - - - $0.24 $1.60 $0.00 (264,091) (214,825) (73,638) - (552,554) $0.41 2,125,262 933,435 5,315,104 312,039 8,685,840 - - - - - $1.12 $0.00 Grant date Expiry date Balance at the start of the year Granted during the year Exercised during the year Forfeited during the year Balance at the end of the year Vested and exerciseable at the end of the year Number Number Number Number Number Number 05 Jul 06 10 May 09 17 Nov 06 30 Sep 08 01 Dec 06 12 Nov 07 30 Sep 09 30 Sep 10 Exercise price $0 $1.27 $1.21 $4.41 651,940 2,697,640 4,209,900 1,796,560 9,356,040 - - - - - (651,940) (2,697,640) - - (3,349,580) - - (33,300) (492,560) (525,860) $4.21 (655,058) (153,873) (808,931) $0.27 - - 4,176,600 1,304,000 5,480,600 - - 4,176,600 - 4,176,600 $1.97 $1.21 2,389,353 1,148,260 3,537,613 - - - $0.24 $0.00 $1.76 $0.00 $1.02 - - - 3,044,411 1,302,133 4,346,544 - - - $0.00 $0.25 $0.00 Performance Rights LTI Rights - 2008/11 19 Dec 08 30 Sep 11 Fair Value (1) $0.30 LTI Cash - 2008/11 19 Dec 08 30 Sep 11 $0.13 Total - Performance rights Weighted average fair value (1) Performance rights have a $nil exercise price. 104 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 36. Share based payments (continued) (a) Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIs) (continued) The weighted average remaining contractual life of shares treated as options and rights outstanding at the end of the period was 1.65 years (2009 – 1.73 years). Fair value of performance rights granted LTI performance rights plan – 2009/12 In respect of the LTI performance rights plan 2009/12, the assessed fair value at grant date of the rights granted during the year ended 30 September 2010 was $1.60 per right. The fair value at grant date is independently determined using an adjusted form of the Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the life of the performance right, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the performance right. The model inputs for these performance rights granted during the year ended 30 September 2010 included: Performance rights were granted at $nil per right, have a three year life, and vest after Absolute TSR targets are met for the period 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2012. Grant date Share price (at grant date) Exercise price Expected price volatility of the Company’s shares Vesting date Expected dividends Risk-free interest rate (based on Australian Government bonds) with approximately three years to maturity (as at 16 December 2009) Share price which TSR targets are measured from 16 Dec 2009 $3.31 $nil 40% pa 30 Sept 2012 2.5% pa 4.54% pa $3.00 Fair value at grant date LTI performance cash plan – 2009/12 LTI performance rights plan 2009/12 $1.60 In respect of the LTI performance cash plan 2009/12 granted during the year ended 30 September 2010, the plan is designed to deliver a similar benefit to employees, and with similar conditions as the LTI performance rights plan 2009/12 outlined above, the exception being that the entitlements, treated as options, are to be settled in cash. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 105 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 36. Share based payments (continued) (b) Employee Share Ownership Plan The Board established the Incitec Pivot Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) on 28 October 2003. Administration of the plan is held with Link Market Services Limited. The Board determines which employees are eligible to receive invitations to participate in the ESOP. Invitations are generally made annually to eligible employees on the following basis: (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) shares acquired are either newly issued shares or existing shares acquired on market. employees are each entitled to acquire shares with a maximum value of $1,000. employees salary sacrifice the value of the shares by equal deductions through to 30 June the following year. employees cannot dispose of the shares for a period of three years from the date of acquisition or until they leave their employment with the Company, whichever occurs first. employees who leave the Company must salary sacrifice any remaining amount prior to departure. (cid:1) (cid:1) Grant date Date shares become unrestricted 2-Jul-07 11-Jul-08 6-Nov-09 9-Sep-10 2-Jul-10 11-Jul-11 6-Nov-12 9-Sep-13 Number of participants as at Number of restricted shares held as at 30-Sep-10 - 30-Sep-09 312 458 413 497 492 - - 30-Sep-10 - 45,800 150,218 143,153 30-Sep-09 81,120 49,200 - - These shares rank equally with all other fully paid ordinary shares from the date acquired by the employee and are eligible for dividends. (c) Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of employee benefit expense were as follows: Shares, treated as options, and rights issued under the LTI performance plans Consolidated 2010 $’000 2009 $’000 3,921 2,359 Total carrying amount of liabilities for cash settled arrangements 296 130 106 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 37. Investments in controlled entities Name of Entity Company Incitec Pivot Limited Controlled Entities - operating Incitec Fertilizers Limited TOP Australia Ltd Southern Cross Fertilisers Pty Ltd Southern Cross International Pty Ltd Incitec Pivot LTI Plan Company Pty Limited Incitec Pivot Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited Incitec Pivot Explosives Holdings Pty Limited TinLinhe Nitrogen Limited Quantum Fertilisers Limited Coltivi Insurance Pte Limited Queensland Operations Pty Limited Incitec Pivot Investments 1 Pty Ltd Incitec Pivot Investments 2 Pty Ltd Incitec Pivot US Investments Incitec Pivot US Holdings Pty Ltd Incitec Pivot Management LLC Incitec Pivot Finance LLC 3 3 3 3 3 3 Incitec Pivot Finance Australia Pty Ltd 3 Dyno Nobel Pty Limited Dyno Nobel Australia LLC Prime Manufacturing Ltd The Dyno Nobel SPS Trust The Dyno Nobel SPS LLC Dyno Nobel Europe Pty Ltd Dyno Nobel Management Pty Limited Industrial Investments Australia Finance Pty Limited Te Moana Insurance Limited Dyno Nobel Holdings IV LLC Dyno Nobel Holdings USA III, Inc. Dyno Nobel Holdings USA II Dyno Nobel Holdings USA II, Inc. Dyno Nobel Holdings USA, Inc. 3) Refer to footnote description on next page. Ownership Interest Country of incorporation Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Hong Kong Australia Hong Kong Hong Kong Singapore Australia Australia Australia USA Australia USA USA Australia Australia USA New Zealand Australia USA Australia Australia Australia New Zealand USA USA USA USA USA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 65% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 107 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 37. Investments in controlled entities (continued) Name of Entity Dyno Nobel Inc. DNX Drilling Inc. Dyno Nobel Transportation Inc. Independent Explosives Co. of Pennsylvania IR Inc. Simsbury Hopmeadow Street LLC Tech Real Estate Holdings LLC Tradestar Corporation Dyno Nobel Explosivos Chile Limitada CMMPM, LLC CMMPM, L.P. Dyno Nobel Peru S.A. Dyno Nobel Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Dyno Nobel Canada Inc. Castonguay Blasting Limited Denesoline Western Explosives Inc. Castonguay G.P. DNX Castonguay Inc. Dyno Nobel Nitrogen Inc. Dyno Nobel Nunavut Inc. Le Groupe Castonguay Inc. Incitec Pivot Finance Canada Inc Polar Explosives 2000 Inc. Polar Explosives Ltd Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited Dampier Ammonia Pty Ltd Dampier Nitrogen Pty Ltd Dampier Urea Pty Ltd DNX Australia Pty Ltd DNX Mongolia LLC DNX PNG Ltd Dyno Nobel Administration Pty Limited Dyno Nobel Moranbah Pty Ltd Dyno Nobel Moura Pty Limited Dyno Nobel Nitrates Pty Ltd Plenty River Ammonia Holdings Pty Ltd PT DNX Indonesia Nitromak DNX Kimya Sanayii AS SC Romnitro Explosives Srl. DNX Nitro Industrial Kimike Sh.p.k Ownership Interest Country of incorporation 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 49% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 84% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA Chile Mexico Mexico Peru Mexico Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Mongolia PNG Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Indonesia Turkey Romania Albania In the process of being liquidated. 1) 2) Due to legal requirements in the Canadian Northwest Territories, the Group cannot own more than 49% of the shares in Denesoline Western Explosives Inc. However, under the joint venture agreement, the Group is entitled to 95% of the assets and profit of Denesoline Western Explosives Inc. 3) Party to deed of cross guarantee dated 30 September 2008. 108 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 38. Deed of cross guarantee Closed Group 2010 2009 $mill $mill Statement of Financial Position Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Other financial assets Current tax assets Inventories Assets classified as held for sale Other assets Total current assets Non-current assets Trade and other receivables Other financial assets Investments accounted for using the equity method Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets Deferred tax assets Other assets Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Provisions Other financial liabilities Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Retirement benefit obligation Deferred tax liabilities Provisions Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Issued capital Reserves Retained earnings Total equity Income Statement Profit / (loss) before income tax Income tax benefit / (expense) Profit for the financial year Retained profits at the beginning of the financial year Movements in retained earnings Dividend paid Retained profits at the end of the financial year 12.0 110.3 111.6 15.3 210.6 2.8 7.7 470.3 567.7 2,668.0 52.2 611.0 188.5 149.5 0.4 4,237.3 4,707.6 244.4 88.4 45.5 - 378.3 94.0 234.2 4.6 30.4 53.8 417.0 795.3 3,912.3 3,265.7 174.7 471.9 3,912.3 93.1 80.8 59.5 30.2 245.7 46.9 14.7 570.9 1,153.8 2,764.4 50.3 541.5 188.9 143.0 3.3 4,845.2 5,416.1 326.6 100.9 46.3 12.9 486.7 798.3 186.4 5.5 - 56.2 1,046.4 1,533.1 3,883.0 3,217.8 397.3 267.9 3,883.0 303.3 (33.6) 269.7 267.9 0.7 (66.4) 471.9 (73.2) 137.9 64.7 526.6 (52.4) (271.0) 267.9 Entities which are party to a Deed of Cross Guarantee dated 30 September 2008, entered into in accordance with ASIC Class Order 98/1418 (as amended), are disclosed in Note 37, Investments in controlled entities. Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement for this closed group are shown above. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 109 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 39. Parent entity disclosure As at, and throughout, the financial year ending 30 September 2010 the parent company of the Group was Incitec Pivot Limited. Company Results of the parent entity Profit for the period Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive Income for the period Financial position of the parent entity at year end Current assets Total assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Net Assets Total equity of the parent entity comprises Share capital Cash flow hedging reserve Foreign currency translation reserve Fair value reserve Retained earnings Total Equity 2010 $mill 78.2 65.6 143.8 420.7 4,515.1 686.5 1,001.5 3,513.6 3,265.7 34.9 46.8 9.8 156.4 3,513.6 2009 $mill 216.4 (0.9) 215.5 483.1 4,989.5 768.4 1,655.8 3,333.7 3,217.8 (9.1) - 22.8 102.2 3,333.7 Parent entity contingencies The directors are of the opinion that Incitec Pivot Limited does not have any contingent liabilities that would require disclosure at 30 September 2010. Parent entity capital commitments for acquisition of property, plant and equipment Plant and equipment Contracted but not yet provided for and payable: Within one year Company 2010 $mill 2009 $mill 6.3 1.3 Parent entity guarantees in respect of debts of its subsidiaries As at 30 September 2010 the Company’s current liabilities exceeded it’s current assets by $265.8m. The parent entity is part of a Deed of Cross Guarantee with the effect that the Group guarantees debts in respect of all members within the Group. The Group’s forecasted cash flows for the next twelve months indicate that it will be able to meet current liabilities as and when they fall due, in addition the Group has un-drawn financing facilities of $1,076.9m at 30 September 2010. Further details of the Deed of Cross Guarantee and the subsidiaries subject to the deed, are disclosed in Note 38. 110 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Notes to the Financial Statements For the year ended 30 September 2010 40. Events subsequent to balance date Since the end of the financial year, in November 2010, the directors have determined to pay a final dividend of 6 cents per share on 17 December 2010. This dividend is unfranked. In October 2010, the Company entered into a 20 year off-take commitment with Perdaman Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (“Perdaman”) for the output of approximately two million tonnes per annum of granular urea fertiliser from the proposed project at Collie, Western Australia. Under the agreement, the Group is the off-taker from the proposed project, which is planned to begin production in 2014. The product supplied to the Group under the agreement would be available for sale in Oceania, Pakistan, Asia and the Americas. Other than the matters reported on above, the directors have not become aware of any other significant matter or circumstance that has arisen since 30 September 2010, that has affected or may affect the operations of the Group, the result of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in subsequent years, which has not been covered in this report. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 111 Directors’ Declaration on the Financial Statements set out on pages 41 to 111 I, John Watson, being a director of Incitec Pivot Limited (“the Company”), do hereby state in accordance with a resolution of the directors that in the opinion of the directors, 1. (a) the financial statements and notes, set out on pages 42 to 111, and the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the Remuneration Report on pages 13 to 31 of the Directors’ Report, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: (i) giving a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company and the Group as at 30 September 2010 and of their performance, for the year ended on that date; and (ii) complying with Accounting Standards in Australia (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001. (b) (c) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1; and there are reasonable grounds to believe the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable. 2. 3. There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and the controlled entities identified in Note 37 will be able to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are or may become subject by virtue of the Deed of Cross Guarantee between the Company and those subsidiaries pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/1418 (as amended). The directors have been given the declaration by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 September 2010. John Watson, AM Chairman Dated at Melbourne this 12th day of November 2010 112 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Shareholder Statistics As at 11 November 2010 Distribution of ordinary shareholder and shareholdings Size of holding – – – – – 1 1,001 5,001 10,001 50,001 100,001 and over Total 1,000 5,000 10,000 50,000 100,000 Number of holders Percentage shares Percentage Number of 14,002 31,591 10,077 7,472 337 220 63,699 6,757,067 21.98% 92,377,523 49.59% 73,866,924 15.82% 139,694,969 11.73% 0.53% 22,820,318 0.35% 1,293,213,309 100.00% 1,628,730,110 0.41% 5.67% 4.54% 8.58% 1.40% 79.40% 100.00% Included in the above total are 2,027 shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of shares. The holdings of the 20 largest holders of fully paid ordinary shares represent 74.42% of that class of shares. Twenty largest ordinary fully paid shareholders HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited National Nominees Limited Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited Cogent Nominees Pty Limited RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited Australian Foundation Investment Company Limited UBS Nominees Pty Ltd AMP Life Limited Queensland Investment Corporation UBS Wealth Management Australia Nominees Pty Ltd Tasman Asset Management Ltd Cogent Nominees Pty Limited Argo Investments Limited HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited- GSCO ECA RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited Australian Reward Investment Alliance RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited Total Substantial shareholders The following parties have declared a relevant interest in the number of voting shares at the date of giving the notice under Part 6C.1 of the Corporations Act. Name Commonwealth Bank of Australia On-market buy-back There is no current on-market buy-back. Number of shares Percentage 24.14% 17.57% 13.74% 5.66% 2.41% 2.31% 1.61% 1.20% 1.11% 0.98% 0.92% 0.67% 0.45% 0.44% 0.24% 0.24% 0.19% 0.19% 0.17% 0.17% 74.42% 393,095,107 286,194,686 223,849,044 92,192,886 39,318,794 37,599,647 26,279,971 19,546,451 18,079,411 15,966,740 15,014,017 10,986,471 7,256,412 7,216,253 3,970,000 3,895,530 3,147,912 3,053,057 2,721,250 2,716,058 1,212,099,697 Votes / Number of Shares 100,437,753 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 115 Five Year Financial Statistics Incitec Pivot Limited and its controlled entities Sales Earnings before depreciation, amortisation, net borrowing costs, individually material items and tax Depreciation and amortisation (excluding individually material items) Earnings before net borrowing costs, individually material items and tax (EBIT) Net borrowing costs (excluding individually material items) Individually material items before tax Taxation revenue / (expense) Operating profit / (loss) after tax and individually material items Operating profit / (loss) after tax and individually material items attributable to minority interest Operating profit / (loss) after tax and individually material items attributable to shareholders of Incitec Pivot Limited Individually material items after tax Operating profit after tax before individually material items (net of tax) Dividends Current assets Property, plant and equipment Investments Intangibles Other non-current assets Total assets Current borrowings and payables Current provisions Non-current borrowings and payables Non-current provisions Total liabilities Net assets Shareholders’ equity Equity attributable to minority interests Total shareholders’ equity Ordinary Shares (1) Number of shares on issue at year end (1) Weighted average number of shares on issue (investor and ordinary) (1) Earnings / (losses) per share (1) before individually material items including individually material items Dividends (declared) Dividends (paid) Dividend franking Share price range –High Low Year end Stockmarket capitalisation at year end Net tangible assets per share Profit margin (earnings before net borrowing costs and tax/sales) Net debt Gearing (net debt/net debt plus equity) Interest cover (earnings before net borrowing costs and tax/net borrowing costs) Net capital expenditure on plant and equipment (cash flow) Net capital expenditure on acquisitions/(disposals) (cash flow) Return on average shareholders funds before individually material items including individually material items 2010 $mill 2,931.7 787.3 (139.0) 648.3 (53.0) (55.4) (127.7) 412.2 1.7 410.5 (32.3) 442.8 66.4 985.9 1,844.1 256.5 3,002.6 220.4 6,309.5 832.4 82.2 1,701.0 82.6 2,698.2 3,611.3 3,609.2 2.1 3,611.3 2009 (2) $mill 3,418.9 2008 $mill 2,918.2 743.0 1,025.6 (167.3) 575.7 (107.6) (782.7) 93.2 (221.4) - (221.4) (569.2) 347.8 271.0 1,033.9 1,663.4 254.0 3,153.0 485.4 6,589.7 1,081.8 93.4 1,987.4 87.5 3,250.1 3,339.6 3,339.6 - 3,339.6 (70.3) 955.3 (80.6) (38.2) (231.9) 604.6 - 604.6 (42.9) 647.5 219.3 1,867.0 1,670.6 311.2 3,962.1 374.5 8,185.4 3,612.3 88.6 1,238.4 90.8 5,030.1 3,155.3 3,155.3 - 3,155.3 thousands thousands 1,628,730 1,628,730 1,612,536 1,217,231 1,612,536 1,217,231 thousands 1,623,134 1,541,925 1,069,507 cents cents cents cents % $mill $ % $mill % times $mill $mill % % 27.3 25.3 7.8 4.1 - $3.78 $2.51 $3.59 5,847.1 0.37 22.1 1,097.1 23.3 12.2 297.3 103.7 12.7 11.9 22.6 (14.4) 4.4 21.6 48 $5.18 $1.74 $2.83 4,563.5 0.12 16.8 1,463.4 30.5 5.4 340.5 2.0 10.7 (6.8) 60.5 56.5 29.7 21.8 100 $9.99 $4.11 $5.07 6,171.4 (0.66) 32.7 2,030.3 39.2 11.9 217.6 586.4 35.1 32.8 (1) The number of shares have been restated as a result of the 20:1 share split as approved by shareholders in September 2008. (2) Comparative information has been restated to reflect changes made in the financial statements. 116 Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 Five Year Financial Statistics 2007 $mill 1,373.2 2006 $mill 1,111.2 348.6 (36.1) 312.5 (28.8) 3.9 (82.4) 205.3 - 205.3 2.8 202.5 75.6 909.0 502.1 1.6 193.7 32.9 1,639.3 325.6 31.2 682.8 64.7 1,104.3 535.0 535.0 - 535.0 159.4 (33.1) 126.2 (12.9) (54.1) (12.6) 46.7 - 46.7 (36.1) 82.8 41.9 597.4 441.1 - 196.2 69.8 1,304.5 315.1 48.2 499.2 62.0 924.5 380.0 380.0 - 380.0 1,008,478 1,008,478 1,008,478 1,008,478 1,008,478 1,130,320 20.1 20.4 15.0 7.5 100 $4.29 $1.19 $4.28 4,313.3 0.34 22.8 411.7 43.5 10.9 62.9 257.0 44.3 44.9 7.3 4.1 5.2 3.6 100 $1.33 $0.77 $1.29 1,304.5 0.18 11.4 275.4 42.0 9.8 21.4 155.3 17.6 9.9 (1) The number of shares have been restated as a result of the 20:1 share split as approved by shareholders in September 2008. (2) Comparative information has been restated to reflect changes made in the financial statements. Incitec Pivot Limited Annual Report 2010 117 This page has been left blank intentionally. This page has been left blank intentionally. This page has been left blank intentionally. Shareholder Information Annual General Meeting 2.00 pm Tuesday 21 December 2010 The Auditorium, Level 2, Melbourne Exhibition Centre, 2 Clarendon Street, Southbank Victoria, Australia Securities Exchange Listing Incitec Pivot Limited’s shares are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and are traded under the code IPL Share Registry Link Market Services Level 12, 680 George Street, Sydney New South Wales 2000, Australia Locked Bag A14, Sydney South New South Wales 1235 Telephone: 1300 303 780 (for callers within Australia) International: +61 2 8280 7765 General Facsimile: +61 2 9287 0303 Proxy Facsimile: +61 2 9287 0309 Email: registrars@linkmarketservices.com.au Website: www.linkmarketservices.com.au Auditor KPMG 147 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000, Australia Incitec Pivot Limited Registered address and head office: 70 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank Victoria 3006, Australia GPO Box 1322, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia Telephone: +61 3 8695 4400 Facsimile: +61 3 8695 4419 www.incitecpivot.com.au Explosives Fertilisers Trading Customers in the mining, quarry, construction, pipeline and geophysical exploration industries trust Dyno Nobel, a global leader in the commercial explosives industry, to deliver Groundbreaking Performance through Practical Innovation. Incitec Pivot Fertilisers is a key supplier of Australia’s soil health and nutrition needs, helping farmers maximise productivity to remain competitive in global markets. Southern Cross International is focused on sales to Australian distributors and export sales to Asia Pacific, the Indian sub-continent and Latin America. I n c i t e c P i v o t L i m i t e d A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 1 0 Annual Report 2010 Incitec Pivot Limited ABN 42 004 080 264 70 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank Victoria 3006, Australia Postal Address Incitec Pivot Limited GPO Box 1322, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia Telephone: +61 3 8695 4400 Facsimile: +61 3 8695 4419 www.incitecpivot.com.au The paper used for this Annual Report 2010 is Harvest Recycled Silk. Harvest Recycled delivers Triple Green Environmental Performance: 60% Recycled Sugar Cane, ECF Bleaching and Sustainable Afforestation. 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above