Infigen Energy Ltd
Annual Report 2014

Plain-text annual report

I N F I G E N E N E R G Y | A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 A LEADING SPECIALIST RENEWABLE ENERGY BUSINESS Chairman’s Report Managing Director’s Report Management Discussion and Analysis Safety and Sustainability Business Highlights About Us CONTENTS 02 04 06 08 12 33 38 40 42 43 Infigen Board Infigen Management Corporate Governance Statement Corporate Structure 51 Directors’ Report 56 Remuneration Report 68 Auditor’s Independence Declaration 69 Financial Statements 75 Notes to Financial Statements 137 Directors’ Declaration 138 Independent Auditor’s Report 140 Additional Investor Information 143 Glossary 145 Corporate Directory All references to $ is a reference to Australian dollars and all years refer to financial year ended 30 June unless specifically marked otherwise. INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 | 1 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS We successfully implemented cost savings initiatives and generated $93.5 million in cash to repay liabilities PRODUCTION INCREASED BY REVENUE INCREASED BY EBITDA INCREASED BY 1% to 4,670 GWh 6% to $303 million 7% to $170 million GLOBAL FACILITY BORROWINGS REDUCED BY PROFIT ON SALE OF US SOLAR DEVELOPMENTS ACQUISITION OF US CLASS A INTERESTS $35.3M $4.4M US$95M 2 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 INCREASE IN REVENUE $17M 286 303 267 ($ million) FY12 FY13 FY14 INCREASE IN EBITDA $12M 170 158 141 ($ million) FY12 FY13 FY14 INCREASE IN NET OPERATING CASH FLOW $12M 96 84 62 ($ million) FY12 FY13 FY14 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS | 3 ABOUT US DEVELOPER Infigen Energy has an extensive and geographically diverse pipeline of prospective renewable energy projects at various stages of development. ƒ Site identification and landowner negotiations. ƒ Wind and solar radiance monitoring, project feasibility and investment evaluation. ƒ Community consultation, cultural heritage, environmental assessment and project planning. ƒ Design, supplier negotiations and connection. ƒ Site mobilisation and foundations. ƒ Electrical works, wind turbine and solar panel installation and commissioning. OWNER Infigen Energy owns interests in 24 operating wind farms and one solar farm (1,646 megawatts equity interest) across Australia and the US. In Australia, Infigen has six operational wind farms with a total operating capacity of 556.6 megawatts, where it holds 100% equity interests and the Capital East solar farm. In the US, Infigen operates 18 wind farms with a total operating capacity of 1,556.7 megawatts, where its equity interest (Class B interest) comprises 1,089.4 megawatts of operating capacity. OPERATOR Infigen Energy manages predictive and preventive maintenance programs, supply chain, maintenance management systems, inventory optimisation, and the development and capabilities of our workforce to maintain and improve operating cost competitiveness. ƒ Safety risk management – actively pursuing zero harm. ƒ Optimising generation productivity through 24 x 7 Operations Control Centre. ƒ Bidding and dispatching into electricity market. ƒ Whole of life asset and investment management. ƒ Sustaining plant availability through reliability centred maintenance. ƒ Managing sale of electricity and ƒ Managing operating risks environmental products. and costs. ƒ Exploring opportunities to refurbish or re-power. ƒ Risk management and revenue assurance. ƒ Arranging and maintaining debt finance. ƒ Ongoing stakeholder engagement. ƒ Assessing acquisition and divestment opportunities. 4 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Community engagement principles Our aim is to sustain the quality of life and wellbeing of individuals and communities touched by our activities through: ƒ Keeping an open dialogue with our communities Our aim is to build strong relationships through transparent communication with communities during all aspects of development, construction and operations, whilst respecting the diverse cultures, views and needs of these communities. Infigen has established efficient, non-threatening, fair and accessible mechanisms for dealing with any concerns raised by the community. These are set out in the conditions of planning approval for operating assets and in the comprehensive consultation process for development projects. ƒ Fostering local relationships Infigen aims to foster lasting relationships with non profit organisations by supporting local community initiatives, however Infigen does not normally sponsor any partisan political activities or religious groups. ƒ Seeking to source locally Infigen will seek to source materials and services from locally based suppliers to support the local economy, enhance community engagement, and to reduce its impact on the environment from transportation. ƒ Raising awareness about renewable energy Infigen promotes renewable energy using factual and scientific data, and advocates for regulation that delivers increased policy predictability for the renewable energy industry. Infigen is a member of the American Wind Energy Association and Australia’s Clean Energy Council. ƒ Community Engagement Register Infigen has developed a Community Engagement Register to monitor and track financial and other support that Infigen provides to local communities. ABOUT US | 5 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT Dear Securityholders, On behalf of the Infigen Boards it is my pleasure to present your 2014 annual report. I’m pleased to report that despite the significant and unwelcome regulatory uncertainty in Australia your company achieved a 14% increase in net operating cash flow during the 2014 financial year. This was driven by revenue growth, cost control, our investment in US Class A interests, the profitable sale of two development assets in the US and good cash conversion. We remain focussed on further improving our financial performance for the benefit of securityholders. But our capacity to do so will be severely inhibited without an equitable resolution to current regulatory uncertainty in Australia. Board and Management Your Board remains predominantly independent, with three independent non-executive Directors (including me as the Chairman), your Managing Director Miles George, and Philip Green, a non-executive nominee Director from our largest securityholder. Your Board members and committee compositions have remained unchanged for the year. In November 2013 Philip Green was re-elected as a Director by securityholders at the Annual General Meeting following his retirement by rotation. We continue to engage with advisors that assess and report on our governance practices on behalf of securityholders. While we might not entirely agree on certain matters, they acknowledge that we continue to implement and maintain good governance practices. Your executive management team also remained largely unchanged during the year. However, during the year we restructured the organisation. We reduced the number of executives for the purpose of strict control of cost whilst simultaneously acquiring technical skills and resources to improve operational performance. The position of Executive General Manager of Australian Operations was made redundant. This resulted in Mr Scott Taylor leaving Infigen on 31 December 2013. On behalf of the company I thank Scott for his contribution to Infigen. Business Performance Infigen’s operational and financial performance improved this year. We achieved a 14% increase in net operating cash flow to $96.2 million, after the payment of interest rate swap termination costs of $16.8 million following the counterparty exercising its right to terminate. Excluding this significant item the business would have generated net operating cash flow of $113 million. From net operating cash flow we repaid $35.3 million of Global Facility debt and distributed $41.4 million to US Class A tax equity members. Including the $16.8 million payment for interest rate swap terminations, the $93.5 million total liability reduction attributable to these items was $13.5 million ahead of the $80 million guidance previously provided. 6 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 In addition, Infigen refinanced its Woodlawn wind farm debt facility, reduced Woodlawn related borrowings by $1.9 million and repaid $4.0 million of borrowings under the Union Bank facility used to fund Infigen’s acquisition of certain US Class A interests. Nonetheless, the company may still face an unduly high level of debt for several more years yet. Infigen reported a net profit before significant items expense of $7.9 million. This was a $29.5 million improvement compared with a $21.6 million net loss before significant items in the prior year. Infigen’s statutory net loss of $8.9 million was a $71.1 million improvement compared with $80 million in the prior year, which included a $58.4 million non-cash impairment expense in relation to the US Cash Generating Unit. During the year we increased our development activities in the US by originating and advancing solar development projects. The US development pipeline now accounts for over 780 MW of late, mid and early stage projects in six states. We sold two US solar development assets that we had developed to a construction- ready status for a net gain on sale of $4.4 million. These projects were part of a multi-stage development opportunity that we have cultivated in California. There is strong demand for projects like these in the US as a result of a supportive regulatory environment. We will continue to assess the optimal capital structure for each of our development projects and consider the options available to maximise the value of those projects to Infigen. NET OPERATING CASH FLOW, UP 14% $96.2M In Australia, we maintained the option value associated with the development pipeline. During the year we received development consent for the proposed Bodangora, Cherry Tree and Flyers Creek wind farms. The carrying value of these projects may need to be revisited subject to legislative changes to the RET that the Government is reportedly considering, which became apparent in August 2014. We also completed the construction of a solar PV and energy storage demonstration facility near our Capital wind farm in New South Wales. This facility is the first of its kind in Australia, and the first solar farm to be registered in the National Electricity Market. We remain committed to community engagement and support in the regions around our operating and development assets. We have strong ties in these communities and we seek to share the economic benefits that our projects generate with the community. We do this by several means, including through our sponsorship and hosting of events at the wind farms and within the community. We are also a strong advocate for continued growth of the renewable energy industry, including through community participation in project ownership where interest is sufficient. Outlook Infigen moves into the 2015 financial year with serious challenges. Difficult decisions may need to be made in the interests of the Group, our securityholders and lenders if regulatory instability in Australia remains, or if there are adverse regulatory outcomes. The Government appointed panel review of the Australian Renewable Energy Target is complete. The report was made public in late August. It recommended either closure of the Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) scheme or its material reduction. Either outcome would have seriously adverse implications for Infigen’s business. Either would realise material sovereign risk, not merely regulatory risk as the Review attempts to incorrectly characterise it. By materially changing the legislated incentive for investment after the investment has been made, the value of that investment will be destroyed. At the time of writing, the Government’s response to the report was unknown, although it appeared that there could be Parliamentary obstacles to enacting legislation in line with the report’s recommendations. In my report to securityholders last year I said that we believed the outcome of any transparent and bona fide review undertaken in the near future would reach a conclusion that the LRET scheme in its current form provides greater benefits to households and businesses than a reduced target scheme. Research commissioned by the Review reached that conclusion. The recommendation to end the scheme is starkly at odds with that finding. In fact, the Panel’s report highlights that the two options that it has recommended will be the most costly for commercial, industrial and residential consumers. Policy should be based on science, sound analysis, prudent precaution, long-term consideration, and proven economics, rather than on anecdotes, wishful thinking, prejudice, blind faith, selective reporting and simple denialism. Regrettably, maintaining a consistent regulatory framework for renewable energy has become politically divisive along partisan and ideological lines. Science, facts and objectivity are too often casualties in a debate where some participants feel free to choose selective, or unfounded, data. The political demonising of the Renewable Energy Target, and of investors who put their trust in the legislated backing for that target, is indefensible. The sovereign risk that would be realised by an adverse rule change after investment has been committed would reflect badly on Australia. We would also hope for consistency, with the Government’s clear pre-election commitment to retain the RET at its established level afforded the same “mandate” status as the commitments to repeal the carbon price and mining tax. THE POLITICAL dEmONISING OF THE RENEWAbLE ENERGy TARGET, ANd OF INvESTORS WHO PUT THEIR TRUST IN THE LEGISLATEd bACkING FOR THAT TARGET, IS INdEFENSIbLE. In these circumstances we will continue to take a cautious approach to expenditure of our limited capital available for growth. Our development pipelines in the US and Australia are attractive. But we will contain the cost of sustaining the Australian pipeline to the absolute minimum pending resolution of current regulatory uncertainty. Infigen’s heavy debt burden continues to preclude the capacity to pay distributions to securityholders and to make further major investments. The challenge of achieving a more sustainable capital structure is made more difficult by the uncertain regulatory environment. Regulatory risk is also an impediment to prospective acquirers of renewable assets, causing them to apply a substantial value discount. We have continued to comply fully with the obligations associated with our debt facilities, including the Global Facility leverage ratio covenant. We remain confident that we will sustain this compliance in the short term. If weak Australian prices for electricity and Large- scale Generation Certificates persist, Infigen will likely need to use available mitigants or remedies to satisfy the covenant in future periods. If Australian Government policy were to destroy value in Infigen’s assets, or if current market conditions were to persist for an extended period, then Infigen would need to assess carefully whether funds held outside the Global Facility should then be used for such mitigants or remedies. In the US, there has been stable and predictable State based renewable energy programs and Federal renewable energy incentives, combined with more efficient planning laws. Our experience in the US has allowed us to invest in our development pipeline in the confidence that should the regulatory environment change, our investments will be grandfathered. It has also been pleasing to see that tackling climate change has become a more prominent issue in the US recently, with the Environment Protection Agency releasing a rule proposal that seeks to reduce US carbon emissions by 30% of 2005 levels by 2030. Australia’s largest trading partner China is also making significant progress in its plans to limit carbon emissions. Its National Development Reform Commission is drafting rules for a national carbon trading market, with some provinces expected to be ready to operate under the new system by 2016 and other provinces to follow soon thereafter. I would like to thank my fellow Directors including the Managing Director, Miles George, his senior management team and all Infigen staff for their contributions to the business during the year. Finally, I would like to thank securityholders for your continued support. Your Directors look forward to welcoming you to our Annual General Meeting to be held at 11am on 20 November 2014 at the Radisson Blu Plaza Hotel, 27 O’Connell St, Sydney. Mike HutcHinson CHAIRMAN CHAIrmAn’S report | 7 MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT Dear Securityholders, During the 2014 financial year (FY14) your management team’s focus was on delivering operating cost savings identified and targeted in 2013, maximising cash flow available for debt amortisation and repayment of US tax equity liabilities, and executing opportunities that improve our ability to achieve a more sustainable capital structure. The ongoing regulatory uncertainty in Australia had an adverse effect on the financial performance of the business, however, more favourable wind conditions, good availability and careful management of operating and overhead costs resulted in an improved EBITDA outcome. Key Milestones In FY14 we continued to progress our high quality development pipelines. In the US, this enabled us to monetise two of our solar development projects. In Australia, we sought to preserve the value of our significant development investment that was based upon the prospective opportunities and requirements enshrined in RET legislation. In November 2013, we entered into agreements to acquire various Class A interests in nine of our US wind farm projects for US$95 million, inclusive of upfront financing costs. The acquired interests were primarily interests in the future cash flows from those projects. The acquisition was financed through utilising US$37 million of Infigen’s existing cash holdings and a new US$58 million debt facility provided by Union Bank for a term of 10.5 years. More than 90% of the future interest expense was hedged with interest rate derivatives. The investment represents a useful step in addressing the challenge of removing the constraints of our existing capital structure in order to further grow our business and resume distributions to our securityholders. In February 2014, we sold two US solar photovoltaic (PV) development projects to Duke Energy Renewables, a business unit of Duke Energy. We had taken the development projects to a construction-ready state, including having transmission connection agreements and 20 year power purchase agreements with Southern California Edison. A steady and supportive regulatory regime in the US provided the investment confidence to seize opportunities to realise value in our development pipeline, including the sale of these development projects during the year. During the year we completed construction of our first solar PV demonstration project at the Capital Renewable Energy Precinct near Bungendore in New South Wales. Capital East will provide valuable insights into the development and construction of utility scale solar PV projects in Australia, and the operation of utility scale solar PV projects in the National Electricity Market. In Australia, we received development consent from the New South Wales Department of Planning and Infrastructure for the proposed Bodangora and Flyers Creek wind farms in central west and central tablelands regions of New South Wales respectively. We also received development consent for the Cherry Tree wind farm near Seymour in Victoria. 8 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 We successfully implemented organisation restructure and cost reduction initiatives during the year to improve efficiency and reduce our operating costs in Australia and the US. Through this we achieved our target of reducing costs by $7 million per annum beginning in the 2014 financial year. We also transitioned to Gamesa the service and maintenance function at each of our US wind farm sites with Gamesa turbines. Operational and Financial Review Infigen’s first priority is the safety of our people and the communities in which we operate. We continue to strive for our safety goal of zero harm. Infigen’s safety performance as measured on a rolling 12 month basis as the number of lost time injuries per million hours worked was steady at 1.2 at 30 June 2014. Our operating capacity increased slightly following the completion of our 130 kW Capital East solar farm. Total production increased 1% largely due to better wind conditions in Australia and the US. Revenue was up 6% to $303 million or $17.1 million reflecting higher overall production and favourable FX movements, offset by lower compensated revenue and lower Large-scale Generation Certificate (LGC) prices in Australia. Operating costs remained flat in local currency terms but increased by 8% to $118 million due to adverse FX movements. Benefits realised as part of the organisation restructure and cost saving initiatives were offset by one-off transaction costs related to the acquisition of US Class A interests and incentive payments to turbine service and maintenance providers that resulted in higher revenue. EBITDA WAS UP BY 7% TO $170M THE INvESTmENT REPRESENTS A USEFUL STEP IN AddRESSING THE CHALLENGE OF REmOvING THE CONSTRAINTS OF OUR ExISTING CAPITAL STRUCTURE, IN ORdER TO FURTHER GROW OUR bUSINESS ANd RESUmE dISTRIbUTIONS TO OUR SECURITyHOLdERS. We executed a 5 year post-warranty service and maintenance agreement with Mitsubishi in the US for the Combine Hills wind farm following the expiry of its original warranty. As a result 75% of the Australian assets and 71% of the US assets continue to be covered by their original warranty, or a medium to long term post- warranty agreement. This has enabled Infigen to substantially reduce future component failure risks, and to forecast operating costs with a higher degree of certainty in the medium term. The original warranty at the Capital wind farm in Australia will expire in the 2015 financial year (FY15). We are discussing a potential post- warranty agreement with service and maintenance providers. A gain on sale of two US solar development assets during the year contributed $4.4 million to EBITDA. Development costs expensed were up $3.0 million to $6.3 million, primarily reflecting costs of further progressing attractive development opportunities in the US and steady costs in the Australian business. Corporate costs were down 4% to $13.6 million. This was primarily due to the organisation restructure and cost saving initiatives announced in February 2013, partially offset by costs associated with undertaking market testing for the potential sale of Capital wind farm. Infigen’s EBITDA was up 7% or $11.8 million to $170.0 million. After financing expenses and the payment of $16.8 million in interest rate swap termination costs, net operating cash flow was up 14% to $96.2 million. This included $16.4 million of distributions received from our investment in US Class A interests. Interest rate swap termination costs were recorded as a significant item. Infigen has only one minor remaining interest rate swap where the counterparty can elect to terminate in 2016. Infigen reported a statutory net loss after tax of $8.9 million ($7.9 million net profit after tax before significant items) notwithstanding weakening market conditions in Australia. This was a $71.1 million improvement on the prior corresponding period, which included a $58.4 million impairment expense in relation to Infigen’s US business. Infigen repaid $35.3 million of Global Facility debt, distributed $41.4 million to US Class A tax equity members and applied $16.8 million cash to meet interest rate swap termination costs. The $93.5 million total liability reduction attributable to these items was $13.5 million ahead of the $80 million guidance previously provided. The book value of Infigen’s securities at 30 June 2014 was $0.64 per security compared with a market price of $0.24. The management team remains focussed on executing a strategy that will result in the value of Infigen’s assets being better recognised in the security price. Guidance and Outlook Infigen begins the 2015 financial year with a goal of maintaining steady operational performance, further reducing Global Facility and Institutional Equity Partnership liabilities and improving the capital structure of the business. In Australia, the acute regulatory uncertainty that has developed since the Australian Government’s appointment of a Panel to conduct another review of the legislated Renewable Energy Target (RET) has resulted in poor liquidity in the LGC market and a significant decline in LGC prices. The LGC spot market price is currently below $30 levels having traded in the low $20s in June 2014. The release of the review Panel’s report in August 2014 did nothing to improve conditions in the LGC market. The outlook for LGC prices remains highly uncertain, with a recovery in LGC prices predicated on restoration of lasting regulatory certainty. Wholesale electricity prices in Australia have also declined significantly following the repeal of the carbon price (which took effect from 1 July 2014) and due to demand reduction in the National Electricity Market of approximately 8% over the last five years. As a result, subject to the outcome of the RET review, the average bundled price across Infigen’s Australian portfolio is expected to be around 10% lower than FY14 based on current forward market prices. In the US, average prices are expected to be only slightly higher than in FY14 due to slightly higher expected merchant prices and some indexation related increases. In FY15: ƒ US operating costs are forecast to be between US$76 and US$78 million (including Infigen Asset Management costs), ƒ Australian operating costs are forecast to be between A$36 and A$38 million (including Energy Markets costs), ƒ US production is expected to improve primarily due to improved availability across the Gamesa fleet, and ƒ Australian production is expected to be broadly in line with FY14. Cash flow to Infigen from its Class B interests in US wind farms is expected to be approximately US$33 million. Subject to the outcome of the RET review, the total cash flow that we expect to have available to repay Global Facility debt and distribute to US Class A tax equity members is expected to be approximately $90 million. In FY15, Infigen will continue to pursue certain growth opportunities. In the US, the development team will continue to advance the solar development pipeline including new projects in California and New York. In Australia, the development team will continue to explore opportunities that are supported by State and Territory Government initiatives. mAnAgIng DIreCtor’S report 2014 | 9 WE CONTINUE TO STRIVE FOR OUR SAFETY GOAL OF ZERO HARM. INFIGEN’S SAFETY PERFORMANCE AS MEASURED ON A ROLLING 12 MONTH BASIS AS THE NUMBER OF LOST TIME INJURIES PER MILLION HOURS WORKED WAS STEADY AT 1.2 AT 30 JUNE 2014. The outlook for Infigen’s Australian business is currently highly uncertain. This is primarily attributable to regulatory instability caused by the latest RET review and associated industry and political positioning and commentary. The current review commenced just 14 months after the last review was concluded. The review Panel’s report has recommended significant adverse changes to annual targets that the Australian Government is considering. If adopted by the Government, the changes recommended by the Panel would still require enactment of necessary legislation. Significant reductions to the annual targets would have a material adverse effect on the Australian renewable energy industry, including Infigen. This would be regarded by investors as a realisation of sovereign risk. In the Prime Minister’s own words, “What investors really need is greater confidence that governments won’t change the rules after the investment has been made.” Now is the time for the Prime Minister to inspire that confidence. LGC prices are currently significantly below those required to sustain existing investment or encourage new investment. If this were to continue it would likely lead to significant asset impairments across the industry, including for Infigen. Continuing depressed prices would also create significant pressure on Infigen’s capacity to meet financial covenants in our borrowing facilities. In the US the outlook is more favourable. At a State and Federal level there have been strong regulations in support of renewable energy and tackling climate change. State renewable portfolio standards will provide build signals for renewable energy projects through to the end of the decade and beyond. The Investment Tax Credit for solar development remains in place until December 2016. These will provide opportunities for Infigen to grow and exploit its solar development pipeline. Finally, I would like to thank securityholders for your ongoing support. I look forward to meeting with you at the AGM and reporting further on the performance of the business at that time. Yours sincerely, MILES GEORGE MANAGING DIRECTOR 10 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT 2014 | 11 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Financial Performance Infigen’s net loss after tax was $8.9 million for the year ended 30 June 2014, a $71.1 million improvement to its net loss after tax of $80.0 million (including a $58.4 million impairment expense) in the prior corresponding period (pcp). The performance of the business during the year was solid primarily due to 6% or $17.1 million revenue growth, underpinned by higher production in Australia and the United States (US). Both the US and Australia recorded operating costs within the guidance ranges previously advised to the market. Other costs were $3.0 million higher reflecting the increase in development activity to further progress attractive development opportunities in the US partially offset by lower corporate costs. During the period the Wildwood I and Pumpjack projects in the US solar development pipeline were sold to Duke Energy Renewables resulting in a net profit on sale of investment of $4.4 million. As a result Infigen has delivered Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) growth of 7% to $170.0 million and net operating cash flow of $96.2 million, after taking into account $16.8 million of interest rate swap termination costs. Infigen repaid $35.3 million of Global Facility debt, directed $41.4 million in cash towards reducing liabilities to US Class A tax equity members and applied $16.8 million in cash to pay interest rate swap termination costs, which together was $13.5 million ahead of the $80 million guidance. In addition Infigen refinanced its Woodlawn debt facility, reduced Woodlawn related borrowings by $1.9 million and repaid $4.0 million of its US Class A interests debt facility. 12 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 Accounting losses arise as Infigen’s business is capital intensive with high gearing through the earlier years of the asset lives, which gives rise to higher initial interest expenses that reduce as the debt is repaid over time. Infigen believes its net operating cash flow and/or EBITDA are more pertinent measures of the financial performance of its operations. Distributions On 14 June 2011, Infigen advised that no FY11 final distribution would be paid and distributions would be suspended for FY12 and FY13. That initiative aimed to maximise the capital available to Infigen to repay debt and fund future opportunities. As advised at subsequent Infigen Annual General Meetings, the sweeping of surplus cash flows from operating assets held within the Global Facility borrower group to repay debt, effectively serves to continue to preclude the payment of distributions to securityholders. Safety Infigen’s first priority is the safety of our people and the communities in which we operate. Our goal is zero lost time incidents and injuries. Infigen’s safety performance as measured on a rolling 12 month lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) was steady at 1.2 at 30 June 2014. Infigen recorded one lost time injury in FY13 and one in FY14. Infigen’s total recordable injury rate (TRIR) fell from 11.0 to 9.8 over the same period. Year ended Group TRIR Group LTIFR 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 CHanGe 9.8 1.2 11.0 1.2 (1.2) 0 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS REVIEW OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE The following tables provide a summary of the key statutory financial outcomes and metrics compared with the prior corresponding period. All reference to $ is a reference to Australian dollars unless specifically marked otherwise. Individual items and totals are rounded to the nearest appropriate number or decimal. Some totals may not add down the column due to rounding of individual components. Period on period changes on a percentage basis are presented as favourable (positive) or unfavourable (negative). Period on period changes to items measured on a percentage basis are presented as percentage point changes (“ppts”). 30 JUNE 2013 (Restated) CHANGE % YEAR ENDED ($M UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) Revenue EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation Significant item – impairment EBIT Net borrowing costs FX & allocation of return (interest) Net income from IEPs Significant item – interest rate swap termination costs Loss before tax Income tax benefit Net loss after tax Net operating cash flow Net operating cash flow per security1(cps) Earnings per security (cps)2 30 JUNE 2014 273.3 169.2 259.7 143.0 (123.9) (114.1) – (39.4) 45.4 (75.5) 4.2 31.2 (16.8) (11.6) 2.7 (8.9) 95.5 12.5 (1.2) (10.5) (74.8) (7.3) 8.2 – (84.5) 4.5 (80.0) 89.0 11.7 (10.5) 5 18 (9) 100 532 (1) 158 280 n.m. 86 (40) 89 7 7 89 Further segmentation of the profit and loss line items in the table above is available in the financial statements and throughout this document. POSITION AT ($M UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) 30 JUNE 2014 30 JUNE 2013 (Restated) CHANGE % Debt Cash Net debt Tax equity liabilities Securityholders’ equity Book gearing EBITDA/(net debt + equity) Net assets per security ($) Net tangible assets per security ($) Capital expenditure3 1,075 1,059 81 994 439 492 66.9% 11.4% 0.64 0.31 13.8 121 938 502 484 66.0% 10.1% 0.63 0.27 18.1 (2) (33) (6) 13 2 0.9 ppt 1.3 ppt 2 15 24 Reconciliation of Statutory Accounts to Economic Interest Infigen has a controlling interest in two wind farm entities in the US in which it owns more than 50% but less than 100% of the Class B interests. Under IFRS, Infigen fully consolidates the financial performance of these wind farm entities within its statutory results and eliminates the non-controlling interest, which is accounted for through “Net income of IEPs”. Following an IFRS change, which precludes the use of the proportional consolidation method previously employed, Infigen must now account for seven of its US joint ventures using the equity method. Under AASB 11 joint arrangements, investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures. The classification depends on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor, rather than the legal structure of the joint arrangement. The Group has joint ventures which include certain institutional equity partnerships. Interests in joint ventures are accounted for in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method, after initially being recognised at cost in the consolidated balance sheet. For statutory purposes the share of profit of the following US joint ventures is recognised in the “Share of net profits of associates” line item: Sweetwater 1, 2 & 3 (50%), Sweetwater 4 & 5 (53%), Blue Canyon (50%), Combine Hills (50%), JB Wind (59.3%)4. Infigen internally reports, and believes that it is more useful to review, the financial performance of the business from an economic interest perspective and has therefore reconciled the economic and statutory presentation for the key Profit and Loss line items on the next page. From this point forward all figures in the Management Discussion and Analysis will reference “Economic Interest” unless specifically stated otherwise. 1 2 Calculated using securities on issue at end of year Calculated using weighted average issued securities 3 4 Represents the cash outflow in relation to capital expenditure Includes the Jersey Atlantic and Bear Creek wind farms MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 13 Year ended 30 June 2014 ($M) statutorY add: sHare of Profit of assoCiates & JVs less: us MinoritY interests eConoMiC interest Revenue Operating EBITDA Other costs and income Share of net profits of associates EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation Significant item – impairment EBIT Net borrowing costs Allocation of return (interest) Net income from IEPs Significant item – interest rate swap termination costs Loss before tax Income tax benefit Net loss Year ended 30 June 2013 ($M) Revenue Operating EBITDA Other costs and income Share of net profits of associates EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation Significant item – impairment EBIT Net borrowing costs FX & allocation of return (interest) Net income from IEPs Loss before tax Income tax benefit Net loss 273.3 171.1 (15.5) 13.7 169.2 (123.9) – 45.4 (75.5) 4.2 31.2 (16.8) (11.6) 2.7 (8.9) 47.6 26.3 – (13.7) 12.6 (26.7) – (14.1) (0.2) – 14.4 – 0.1 (0.1) – (17.7) (11.9) – – (11.9) 8.9 – (3.0) 0.2 – 2.8 – – – – 303.2 185.5 (15.5) – 170.0 (141.7) – 28.3 (75.5) 4.2 48.4 (16.8) (11.5) 2.6 (8.9) statutorY add: sHare of Profit of assoCiates & JVs less:us MinoritY interests eConoMiC interest 259.7 164.6 (18.6) (3.0) 143.0 (114.1) (39.4) (10.5) (74.8) (7.3) 8.2 (84.5) 4.5 (80.0) 43.0 23.5 – 3.0 26.5 (23.7) (19.0) (16.2) (1.5) – 17.8 – – – (16.5) (11.3) – – (11.3) 7.6 – (3.7) 0.4 – 3.3 – – – 286.1 176.8 (18.6) – 158.2 (130.3) (58.4) (30.5) (76.0) (7.3) 29.3 (84.5) 4.5 (80.0) Significant transactions that occurred in FY14 On 13 November 2013 Infigen announced that it had entered into agreements to acquire various Class A interests in nine of its US wind farm projects for US$95 million, inclusive of upfront financing costs. The acquired interests are primarily interests in the future cash flows from those projects. The acquisition was financed through utilising US$37 million of Infigen’s existing cash holdings and a new US$58 million debt facility provided by Union Bank for a term of 10.5 years. More than 90% of the future interest expense was hedged with interest rate derivatives. For further information refer to Appendix C. Review of statement of income Year ended ($M unless otHerwise indiCated) Revenue Operating EBITDA Other costs and income EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation Significant item – impairment EBIT Net borrowing costs FX & allocation of return (interest) Net income from IEPs Significant item – interest rate swap termination costs Loss before tax Income tax benefit Net loss 14 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 CHanGe % 303.2 185.5 (15.5) 170.0 (141.7) – 28.3 (75.5) 4.2 48.4 (16.8) (11.5) 2.6 (8.9) 286.1 176.8 (18.6) 158.2 (130.3) (58.4) (30.5) (76.0) (7.3) 29.3 – (84.5) 4.5 (80.0) 6 5 17 7 (9) 100 193 1 158 65 n.m. 86 (42) 89 foreiGn exCHanGe rates 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 CHanGe % AUD:USD (average rate) AUD:EUR (average rate) AUD:USD (closing rate) AUD:EUR (closing rate) 0.9179 0.6764 0.9420 0.6906 1.0242 0.7941 0.9275 0.7095 (10) (15) 2 (3) Revenue was $303.2 million, up 6% or $17.1 million reflecting higher overall production and favourable FX movement, offset by lower compensated revenue and lower Large-scale Generation Certificate (LGC) prices in Australia. ƒ In Australia, revenue decreased $0.9 million or 1% to $145.4 million as a result of lower LGC prices (-$6.7 million), lower merchant electricity prices (-$2.4 million) and higher compensated revenue in the prior year (-$3.0 million), offset by higher production (+$9.9 million), contracted CPI increase (+$0.7 million) and a favourable marginal loss factor (MLF) movement (+$0.6 million). ƒ In the US, revenue increased 1% or US$2.0 million to US$144.9 million5 reflecting higher production (+US$1.9 million) and higher Renewable Energy Credit (REC) revenue (+US$1.3 million) offset by lower electricity prices (-US$0.6 million) and lower compensated and other revenue (-US$0.6 million). Operating Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (Operating EBITDA) was $185.5 million, up 5% or $8.7 million. This was primarily due to: ƒ Australia: a 1% or $0.7 million decrease in operating EBITDA to $109.3 million reflecting lower LGC prices and lower compensated revenue, slightly offset by lower operating costs – including savings in payroll costs from reduction to staff head count and professional fees that occurred in pcp, offset by higher turbine O&M incentive payments. Net borrowing costs were $75.5 million, down 1% or $0.5 million. Interest expense reduced by $0.9 million due to lower outstanding Global Facility and Woodlawn facility borrowings partially offset by interest expense related to the new Union Bank facility. Higher bank fees (+$1.3 million) primarily related to the refinancing of the Woodlawn project finance facility and the new Union Bank facility and lower interest income (-$1.3 million) due to lower cash balances were offset by lower amortisation of decommissioning costs (-$2.3 million). Year ended ($M) 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 CHanGe % Interest expense Bank fees & amortisation of loan costs Amortisation of decommissioning costs Total borrowing costs Interest income Net borrowing costs FX gain/(loss) Non-hedge FX derivatives Non-hedge interest rate derivatives Non-hedge electricity derivatives (70.7) (5.6) (71.6) (4.3) (0.3) (2.6) (76.6) 1.1 (75.5) 1.7 (2.2) 0.3 0.2 (78.5) 2.4 (76.0) (9.1) 1.5 0.3 – 1 (30) 88 2 (54) 1 119 (247) – n.m. FX gain/(loss) & revaluation of derivatives Allocation of return (interest) Interest rate swap termination costs – (7.3) 100 4.2 (16.8) – – n.m. n.m. ƒ US: a 3% or US$1.9 million increase to US$70.0 million reflecting higher revenue from higher production and higher REC revenue, and steady operating costs. ƒ FX: the depreciation of the Australian Dollar (AUD) against the US Dollar (USD) resulted in a $7.6 million EBITDA benefit. The foreign exchange gain of $1.7 million was due to the appreciation of the AUD and revaluation of the USD and EUR debt held by an Australian company within the Group at 30 June 2014, and was offset by movements in non-hedge derivatives. Other income of $4.4 million represents the gain on sale of two US solar development assets during the year. The allocation of return of $4.2 million relates to the investment in Class A interests in the US. Development costs expensed were $6.3 million, up 91% or $3.0 million primarily reflecting costs of further progressing attractive development opportunities in the US and steady costs in the Australian business. Termination of interest rate swaps resulted in an expense of $16.8 million and was recorded in significant items. As a result of hedge accounting, this item had already been reflected in securityholders’ equity in prior periods. Corporate costs were $13.6 million, down 4% or $0.5 million. This was primarily due to the organisational restructure and cost saving initiatives announced in February 2013 partially offset by costs associated with undertaking market testing for the potential sale of Capital wind farm. EBITDA was $170.0 million, up 7% or $11.8 million reflecting higher operating EBITDA and lower corporate costs partially offset by higher development costs. Depreciation and amortisation expense was $141.7 million, 9% or $11.4 million higher than the prior year largely due to FX movements. Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) was $28.3 million, 193% or $58.7 million higher. The prior year’s EBIT included an impairment charge of $58.4 million in relation to the US cash generating unit. Net income from US IEPs6 was $48.4 million, up 65% or $19.1 million compared with $29.3 million in the pcp. Further details are available in Appendix B including an explanation of the structure of IEPs (including accounting treatment). Income tax benefit of $2.6 million was $1.9 million lower than the prior year. Infigen reported a net loss after tax for the year of $8.9 million, a favourable movement of $71.1 million compared with the prior year. Excluding the interest rate swap termination costs, Infigen earned a net profit after tax but before significant items of $7.9 million. 5 6 Includes asset management revenue third party IAM activity Institutional Equity Partnerships MAnAgeMent Discussion AnD AnAlYsis | 15 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS CASh fLOW Cash movement Cash at 30 June 2014 was $83 million, 33% or $41 million lower than 30 June 2013. The cash balance at 30 June 2014 comprises $23 million held by entities within the Global Facility Borrower Group7 with $61 million ($105 million at 30 June 2013) held by entities outside of that group (‘Excluded Companies’). Cash inflows for the year included $96.2 million of net operating cash flow (including $16.4 million of distributions from the investment in Class A interests), $113.9 million of proceeds from borrowings related to the investment in Class A interests and the refinance of Woodlawn wind farm (refer to to the Debt section on page 17) and $8.3 million in proceeds from the sale of solar PV development projects in the US. Cash outflows were $100 million for the investment in US Class A interests, $98.6 million for debt repayments (including capitalised costs associated with obtaining financing (refer to the Debt section on page 17), $41.4 million in distributions to US IEP Class A members, $15.7 million for development and property, plant and equipment (PP&E) capex and $3.8 million unrealised FX gains on cash balances held in USD and EUR due to the depreciation of the AUD. Expenditure on PP&E and development included $4.0 million in Australia for development pipeline activity ($2.1 million) and wind farm and IT systems ($1.9 million) including balance of plant equipment modifications and communication upgrades. In the US payments of $10.4 million comprised wind farm capex of $9.0 million primarily related to a turbine replacement at Allegheny Ridge following a nacelle fire, expenditure related to the post-warranty agreements at sites with Gamesa turbines, and major component replacements at sites not covered by post warranty agreements. $1.4 million related to US solar PV development activities. The $44.0 million reduction in cash held by Excluded Companies is largely due to the equity investment made in US Class A interests and the operating and capital expenditure related to development in the US and Australia, partially offset by income received from the investment in US Class A interests, the proceeds from the sale of US solar PV developments and the net income from Woodlawn after refinancing costs. Net Operating Cash Flow (NOCF) Year ended ($M) Operating EBITDA Corporate, development & other costs Movement in working capital & non-cash items Net financing costs and taxes paid Distributions received from financial assets8 NOCF before significant items Interest rate swap termination costs Net operating cash flow NOCF of associates and joint ventures NOCF of non-controlling interests Net operating cash flow (statutory) 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 CHanGe % 185.5 (15.5) (4.2) (69.2) 16.4 113.0 (16.8) 96.2 (13.0) 12.2 95.5 176.8 (18.6) (2.0) (72.1) – 84.2 – 84.2 (8.7) 13.6 89.0 5 17 (110) 4 n.m. 34 n.m. 14 (49) (10) 7 Net operating cash flow was $96.2 million, 14% or $12.0 million higher than the pcp due to distributions received from investments in US Class A interests (+$16.4 million), higher EBITDA (+$11.8 million) and lower net financing costs and taxes paid (+$2.9 million) partially offset by interest rate swap termination costs -$16.8 million) and adverse movements in working capital (-$2.2 million). 7 8 Infigen’s borrowings include a multi-currency Global Facility secured by Infigen’s interests in all of its operational wind farms except Woodlawn and Infigen’s US Class A interests – ‘the Borrower Group’ Investments in US Class A interests 16 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Debt At 30 June 2014 total borrowings9 (including capitalised loan costs) were $1,076.5 million10 comprising Global Facility borrowings ($979.5 million), Woodlawn project finance ($50.0 million) and the Union Bank facility ($57.6 million), with $12.1 million attributable to capitalised loan costs. This was $16.5 million higher than the pcp due to the $62.2 million drawdown of the Union Bank facility offset by $35.3 million in Global Facility debt repayments, a $1.9 million net decrease in Woodlawn project finance facility borrowings, and $4.0 million in Union Bank facility debt repayments. Net loan costs capitalised and foreign exchange differences had the effect of reducing the reported borrowings by $4.5 million. The Woodlawn project finance facility was refinanced with Westpac Banking Corporation and Clean Energy Finance Corporation during the year. The new facility was arranged to finance both Woodlawn and the proposed Capital solar farm. December 2018 is the earliest maturity date for 50% of the new facility. The terms of the facility include review events for changes in regulatory conditions that affect the expected future price of electricity and LGCs. The review events provide an agreed mechanism by which the facility can be re-sized after a specified review event has occurred. The repeal of the carbon pricing mechanism in July 2014 triggered a review event and as a result a portion of the cash generated by Woodlawn in FY15 has been applied to fund debt prepayment. The average margin across all facilities was 134 basis points. Infigen has interest rate hedges in place for the majority of its borrowings. Forward prices for electricity in Australia have declined materially following the removal of the carbon price and due to the softening of National Electricity Market demand – which has declined approximately 8% over the last five years. The uncertainty concerning the Australian Government’s intentions for the future of the Renewable Energy Target (RET) has also resulted in low LGC market prices. If there is a sustained improvement to the regulatory outlook then LGC prices should materially increase leading to an improvement in operating conditions. Infigen expects to continue to satisfy the Global Facility leverage ratio covenant in conformity with the terms of the facility in the short term. In the event that weak Australian LGC and electricity prices persist, Infigen will likely need to use mitigants or remedies available under the Global Facility in order to satisfy the leverage ratio covenant test in future testing periods. Foreign exchange (FX) risk also becomes increasingly relevant as the operating cash flow from Infigen’s US assets is progressively reallocated to the Class A members, given that a substantial portion of the Global Facility borrowings is USD denominated. Deterioration of the Australian dollar against the US dollar would therefore place additional pressure on leverage ratio covenant compliance. 9 Further information is available in note 17 to the financial statements 10 $1,075 million on a statutory basis, which includes $1.5 million joint venture borrowings 11 Refer to Appendix B Should Infigen utilise available mitigants or remedies to support Global Facility leverage ratio compliance, this is likely to involve applying cash currently held in Excluded Companies. Excluded Company cash could be contributed to the Global Facility Borrower Group, with any contributed amount then applied to repay Global Facility debt semi-annually in accordance with the terms of the facility. If the current Australian RET review were to result in significant value destruction to Infigen’s existing assets, or if current market conditions continue for an extended period, then Infigen would consider carefully whether the use of Excluded Company cash for those purposes was then appropriate. The Global Facility leverage ratio covenant was met at 30 June 2014. Net debt Net debt (total borrowing – total cost)* for the consolidated entity (economic interest) increased from $938 million at 30 June 2013 to $994 million at 30 June 2014. The net movement of $56 million was primarily due to new borrowings in the year related to the investment in US Class A interests. * Does not include US IEP tax equity Equity Total equity increased 2% from $484.0 million at 30 June 2013 to $492.1 million at 30 June 2014. The increase of $8.1 million is attributable to: ƒ the net loss for the period (-$8.9 million) ƒ a change in the fair value of interest rate hedges (+$22.4 million) ƒ exchange difference on the translation of foreign operations and movement in fair value of net investments (-$6.3 million), and ƒ net increase in the share based payments reserve (+$0.8 million). During the year the number of Infigen securities on issue increased by 2,727,462 to 764,993,434. These securities were issued to key management personnel as deferred remuneration under the short term incentive plan. Gearing The following table provides a comparison of Infigen’s book gearing (net debt / (net debt + total equity)) at 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2014. The change reflects the movements in net debt and equity described above. as at ($M) Net debt Total equity 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 CHanGe % 994 492 938 484 (6) 2 Book gearing 66.9% 65.9% (1.0 ppts) US IEP tax equity11 516 589 12 Total gearing 75.4% 75.9% 0.5 ppts A balance sheet by country is provided in Appendix A. MAnAgeMent Discussion AnD AnAlYsis | 17 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW Business overview In the US, Infigen has an operating capacity of 1,089 MW (Class B interest) comprising 18 wind farms. Of these, 14 have Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) that account for 872 MW of the operating capacity, one of which (4 MW of capacity) generates revenue both through a PPA and on a merchant basis. The four remaining wind farms (215 MW) operate purely on a merchant basis. Fifteen of Infigen’s US wind farms continue to generate Production Tax Credits (PTCs) which apply for 10 years from the date of first commercial operation. Wind farms that no longer qualify for PTCs are Sweetwater 1, Blue Canyon and Combine Hills. PTCs are worth US$23 per MWh for the 2014 calendar year. Each wind farm is entitled to one PTC per MWh of production. The Group accounts for PTCs as other income in the period that the credit is derived, on the basis that it reduces the liability to the Class A members. Further information on Infigen’s US Institutional Equity Partnerships is provided in Appendix B. In Australia, Infigen has an operating capacity of 557 MW comprising six wind farms, namely the 89.1 MW Alinta wind farm in Western Australia (WA), the three Lake Bonney wind farms in South Australia (SA) with capacities of 80.5 MW, 159 MW and 39 MW respectively, and the 140.7 MW Capital and 48.3 MW Woodlawn wind farms in New South Wales (NSW). Infigen holds a 100% equity interest in each of its Australian wind farms. Infigen sells the output from its Australian wind farms through ‘run of plant’ PPAs and LGC sales agreements, retail supply agreements and on a merchant basis (wholesale electricity and LGC markets). Output from the Lake Bonney 1 and Alinta wind farms is sold under contracts. The majority of the capacity of the Capital wind farm is contracted to meet demand from the Sydney Desalination Plant under a long term retail supply agreement, while a small component of the output is sold on a merchant basis. Output from the Lake Bonney 2 & 3 and the Woodlawn wind farms is sold on a merchant basis. Of Infigen’s six operational Australian wind farms, 40% of annual P50 production is currently contracted under medium and long term agreements. Each wind farm is entitled to create one LGC for each MWh that is exported to the grid after applying the marginal loss factor. INFIGEN INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAAL REPORT 2014 INFIGEN 18 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 A INFIGEN OWNS INTERESTS IN WIND FARMS ACROSS AUSTRALIA AND THE US MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 19 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS UNITED STATES REVENUE (US$ MILLION) 145 PRODUCTION (GWH) 3,098 144 143 145 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE US REGION DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED: ƒ Delivery of steady operating costs within the guidance range of US$73–$76 million ƒ The acquisition of US Class A interests, improving total cash flow to the business FY12 FY13 FY14 ƒ The profitable sale of Wildwood I and Pumpjack solar PV development projects ƒ Enhancement of the solar development pipeline, which now accounts for over 780 MW of late, mid and early stage projects across six states 3,136 3,089 3,098 FY12 FY13 FY14 YEAR ENDED Operating capacity (MW) Production (GWh) P50 production (GWh) Total revenue (US$M) Operating costs (US$M) Operating EBITDA (US$M) EBITDA margin Average price (US$/MWh) Operating costs (US$/MWh) PTCs (US$M) US Business translation to AUD Revenue (A$M) Operating EBITDA (A$M) 30 JUNE 2014 30 JUNE 2013 CHANGE CHANGE % 1,089 3,098 3,313 144.9 74.9 70.0 48.3% 45.5 24.2 67.7 157.8 76.2 1,089 3,089 3,313 142.9 74.8 68.1 47.7% 45.0 24.2 71.1 139.8 66.8 – 9.0 – 2.0 (0.1) 1.9 – 0.5 – (3.4) 18.0 9.4 – – – 1 – 3 0.6 ppt 1 – (5) 13 14 There was no change to Infigen’s operating capacity in the US during the period with operating capacity remaining at 1,089 MW (Class B interest). Production YEAR ENDED Operating capacity (MW) Capacity factor Turbine availability Site availability Production (GWh) 30 JUNE 2014 30 JUNE 2013 1,089 32.5% 96.0% 95.2% 3,098 1,089 32.4% CHANGE – 0.1 ppt 96.1% (0.1) ppt 95.2% 3,089 – 9 Site availability of 95.2% was in line with the prior year and turbine availability decreased 0.1 percentage points to 96.0% due to certain sites that were transitioning onto the new Gamesa warranty agreements. 20 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Production increased 9 GWh or 0.3% to 3,098 GWh primarily due to better wind conditions across all regions other than the South Central, offset by lower Gamesa turbine availability at Mendota and GSG due to inspections, maintenance and repairs. Improved wind conditions and turbine availability at Cedar Creek (+27 GWh) and Caprock (+23 GWh) together with improved wind conditions at Allegheny (+22 GWh) contributed to increased production. This was partially offset by lower production at GSG (-28 GWh) and Mendota (-19 GWh) primarily due to lower turbine availability, and lower production at Sweetwater 4 (-16 GWh) due to less favourable wind conditions. INFIGEN’S US OPERATING ASSETS INSTALLED CAPACITY (MW) 1,089 WIND FARMS 18 OPERATIONAL WIND FARMS (CAPACITY) BUENA VISTA (38.0 MW) CEDAR CREEK (200.3 MW) BLUE CANYON (37.1 MW) GSG (80.0 MW) BEAR CREEK (14.2 MW) JERSEY ATLANTIC (4.4 MW) ALLEGHENY RIDGE (80.0 MW) CRESCENT RIDGE (40.8 MW) MENDOTA (51.7 MW) ARAGONNE MESA (90.0 MW) CAPROCK (80.0 MW) SWEETWATER 1–5 (302.4 MW) KUMEYAAY (50.0 MW) COMBINE HILLS (20.5 MW) Price Approximately 80% of Infigen’s US capacity is contracted for a weighted average duration of 10.5 years. The capacity contracted and the PPA expiry dates are provided in the following table. The PJM and ERCOT time weighted average (TWA) and dispatch weighted average (DWA) prices for the year are outlined below. WIND FARM Sweetwater 2 Buena Vista Sweetwater 312 Blue Canyon Cedar Creek Combine Hills Sweetwater 1 Caprock Sweetwater 312 Kumeyaay Bear Creek Aragonne Mesa Sweetwater 4 Jersey Atlantic Allegheny Ridge Total EQUITY MW PPA END DATE 45.8 38.0 16.9 37.1 200.3 20.5 18.8 80.0 50.6 50.0 14.2 90.0 127.6 2.2 80.0 872.0 Feb-17 Apr-17 Dec-17 Jan-23 Nov-27 Dec-27 Dec-23 Dec-24 Dec-25 Dec-25 Mar-26 Dec-26 May-27 Mar-26 Dec-29 The simple average electricity price (total wind farm revenue divided by total production) of US$45.5/MWh was 1% higher compared to US$45.0/MWh in the pcp. This was due to higher merchant electricity prices as a result of severe winter conditions and higher PJM REC prices, partially offset by lower average prices from Crescent Ridge following the expiration of its PPA in the pcp. 12 Note there are two PPAs related to the Sweetwater 3 wind farm 13 Crescent Ridge’s PPA expired at the end of FY13 Time weighted average PERIOD (US$/MWH) PJM-AECO (Jersey Atlantic) PJM-CE (GSG, Mendota & Crescent Ridge) FY14 53.62 39.47 ERCOT-W (Sweetwater 5) 36.62 29.55 FY13 CHANGE % 38.26 31.59 40 25 24 Dispatch weighted average PERIOD (US$/MWH) PJM-AECO (Jersey Atlantic) PJM-CE (GSG & Mendota) PJM-CE (Crescent Ridge) ERCOT-W (Sweetwater 5) FY14 37.66 32.23 34.55 30.74 FY13 CHANGE % 30.14 25.57 n/a13 21.08 25 26 n/a 46 Infigen’s merchant DWA price was 30%, 18%, 12% and 16% less than the TWA price in the PJM-AECO, PJM-CE, PJM-CE (including Crescent) and ERCOT-W markets respectively during the period. Fundamentally the PJM REC market is adequately supplied, however, availability of RECs through the ‘over-the-counter’ market has been limited resulting in average market prices trading at US$14.6/REC compared to US$4.5/REC in the prior year. The ERCOT REC average market prices were trading at US$1.3/REC compared to US$0.8/REC in the prior year. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 21 infigen’s us solAR DevelopMent pipeline MinnesotA (28 MW) neW YoRK (75 MW) cAlifoRniA (75 MW) coloRADo (50 MW) neBRAsKA (110 MW) noRtH cARolinA (40 MW) geoRgiA (140 MW) neW MeXico (105 MW) teXAs (105 MW) solAR fARM (pRoposeD cApAcitY) Revenue Revenue increased 1% or US$2.0 million to US$144.914 million reflecting higher production (+US$1.9 million) primarily at Allegheny, Cedar Creek and Caprock and higher REC revenue (+US$1.3 million), offset by lower electricity prices (-US$0.6 million) related to expiration of the PPA at Crescent Ridge in the pcp, and lower compensated and other revenue (-US$0.6 million) primarily due to insurance proceeds received in the pcp, partially offset by liquidated damages in relation to the Gamesa extended warranty agreements. Operating costs Total operating costs increased US$0.1 million to US$74.9 million reflecting: ƒ US$2.1 million decrease in asset management costs primarily reflecting lower legal costs following the resolution of the Gamesa dispute (-US$2.4 million) and savings following the organisational restructure and cost savings initiatives implemented in early 2013 (-US$0.6 million), partially offset by transaction costs associated with the acquisition of Class A interests (+US$1.0 million); ƒ US$2.5 million increase in turbine O&M costs due to higher Gamesa O&M and turbine warranty costs (+US$3.5 million) and higher MHI bonus payments (+US$0.4 million), offset by reduced component and consumable expenses (-US$1.5 million); ƒ US$1.2 million increase in balance of plant costs associated with road maintenance and equipment repairs at Aragonne and Cedar Creek (+US$0.7 million), and routine maintenance and equipment upgrades (+US$0.5 million); and ƒ US$1.5 million decrease in other direct costs associated with lower transmission and connection fees and lower insurance and tax expenses. 14 15 Includes asset management revenue related to third party IAM activity Includes asset management cost related to third party IAM activity 22 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 Year ended (uS$m) 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 Change Change % Asset management15 Turbine O&M Balance of plant Other direct costs 13.8 35.6 8.1 17.4 15.9 33.1 6.9 18.9 2.1 (2.5) (1.2) 1.5 Total operating costs 74.9 74.8 (0.1) 13 (8) (17) 8 – Operating EBITDA Operating EBITDA for the US business increased US$1.9 million or 3% to US$70.0 million reflecting higher revenue. Operating EBITDA margin was 48.3% compared with 47.7% in the prior year reflecting higher revenue and steady cost outcomes. Depreciation and amortisation Depreciation and amortisation decreased US$0.5 million to US$81.8 million. Infigen depreciates its US wind farms and associated plant using the straight line method over 25 years. Development During the year the development team continued to advance the Wildwood I and Pumpjack projects in the solar photovoltaic (PV) development pipeline and sold the projects to Duke Energy Renewables, a business unit of Duke Energy. These two projects are the first of a multi-stage development opportunity that Infigen has cultivated within California. These transactions demonstrate Infigen’s capabilities to realise value from its development pipeline where opportunities arise. The development team completed interconnection studies for the Rio Bravo I and Wildwood II projects in California, and initiated the development of additional solar PV projects in New York and California. Infigen’s US development pipeline now accounts for over 780 MW of late, mid and early stage projects in six states. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS KEY ACHIEVEMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED: AUSTRALIA REVENUE (AUD$ MILLION) 145 146 145 126 PRODUCTION (GWH) 1,572 FY12 FY13 FY14 1,516 1,572 1,402 FY12 FY13 FY14 YEAR ENDED Operating capacity (MW) Production (GWh) P50 production (GWh) Total revenue ($M) Operating costs ($M) Operating EBITDA ($M) Operating EBITDA margin (%) Average price (A$/MWh) Operating cost (A$/MWh) ƒ Strong operating EBITDA performance in a challenging market driven by improved wind conditions and by delivering operating costs of $36.1 million, within the guidance range of $35 to $37 million ƒ Improved operational performance from generation assets through enhanced energy market activities and aligning OEM servicing to market conditions ƒ Capital East solar demonstration facility - the first stage (approximately 130 kW) of the facility was completed and registered as a generator with AEMO in September 2013 ƒ Development approvals received for Bodangora, Cherry Tree and Flyers Creek wind farms with a total proposed installed capacity of approximately 300 MW 30 JUNE 2014 30 JUNE 2013 CHANGE CHANGE % 557 1,572 1,599 145.4 (36.1) 109.3 75.2 92.5 23.0 557 1,516 1,599 146.3 (36.3) 110.0 75.2 96.6 23.9 – 56 – (0.9) 0.2 (0.7) – (4.1) 0.9 – 4 – (1) 1 (1) – (4) 4 Infigen’s operating capacity in Australia remained at 556.7 MW during the period. Production YEAR ENDED Operating capacity (MW) Capacity factor Turbine availability Site availability Production (GWh) 30 JUNE 2014 30 JUNE 2013 CHANGE 557 32.2% 97.2% 96.6% 1,572 557 31.1% 97.6% 96.8% 1,516 – 1.1 ppt (0.4) ppt (0.2) ppt 56 Production increased 4% or 56 GWh to 1,572 GWh. The pcp included 40 GWh of compensated production, therefore on a normalised basis production increased 6% or 96 GWh from 1,476 GWh to 1,572 GWh as a result of better wind conditions. Higher production was primarily due to better wind conditions at all wind farms except Alinta (+102 GWh), lower network constraints (+11 GWh) and higher turbine availability (+4 GWh) at Alinta. This was partially offset by lower wind conditions at Alinta (-7 GWh), increased network constraints at Lake Bonney (-6 GWh) due to line works, and lower turbine availability due to equipment failures at Capital (-6 GWh). MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 23 infigen’s AustRAliAn opeRAting Assets instAlleD cApAcitY (MW) 557 WinD fARMs 6 Prices Electricity The TWA spot electricity prices in SA and NSW were 12% and 5% lower than the pcp respectively due to lower demand and the non-recurrence of market events that led to high price events in the pcp. tWa WholeSale eleCtriCitY ($/mWh) SA (Lake Bonney) NSW (Capital & Woodlawn) FY14 61.71 52.26 FY13 69.75 55.10 10 Year average 49.96 43.37 Infigen’s DWA electricity prices decreased 6% to $55.17/MWh in SA and 3% to $52.91/MWh in NSW. The decreases broadly correlate with the TWA price decreases in each region. Average spot prices in Australia can be significantly influenced by short term extreme price events. Wholesale electricity spot prices can vary between the market price floor of -$1,000/MWh and the market price cap of $13,100/MWh. During the year there were only seven half-hourly settlement prices above $300/MWh in NSW and 74 in SA. There were also 33 half-hourly settlement prices in SA above $1,000/MWh largely driven by competitive bidding, plant failures, low wind, high demand and transmission constraints. Large-scale Generation Certificates (LGCs) Period ($/mWh) Large-scale Generation Certificates FY14 30.84 FY13 35.94 24 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 AlintA (89.1 MW) lAKe BonneY 1 (80.5 MW) lAKe BonneY 2 (159.0 MW) lAKe BonneY 3 (39 MW) WooDlAWn (48.3 MW) cApitAl (140.7 MW) cApitAl eAst DeMo (0.13 MW) opeRAtionAl WinD fARMs (cApAcitY) opeRAtionAl solAR fARMs (cApAcitY) The average merchant LGC price for the year of $30.84/LGC was 14% lower compared to an average price of $35.94/LGC in the prior year. The closing LGC price at 30 June 2014 was $28.50/LGC compared to $33.25/LGC at 30 June 2013. Bundled pricing The realised weighted average portfolio bundled (electricity and LGCs) price was $92.5/MWh, 4% lower than $96.6/ MWh realised in the prior year. This reflected lower dispatch weighted wholesale electricity prices from mild weather and lower demand, and lower average LGC prices due to regulatory uncertainty. Revenue Revenue decreased $0.9 million or 1% to $145.4 million as a result of lower LGC prices (-$6.7 million), lower electricity prices (-$2.4 million) and higher compensation in prior year (-$3.0 million), offset by higher production (+$9.9 million), contracted CPI increase (+$0.7 million) and favourable MLF movement (+$0.6 million). Operating Costs Infigen’s Australian wind turbines are covered by their Original Equipment Manufacturer’s warranty (Suzlon) or post-warranty service agreements (Vestas). This contributes to stability and predictability of wind farm costs. Change % Year ended (a$m) 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 Change Change % (14) Asset management Turbine O&M Balance of plant Other direct costs Total wind farm costs Energy Markets Total operating costs 6.0 18.3 1.6 7.3 33.1 3.0 36.1 7.0 17.2 0.9 7.5 32.6 3.7 36.3 1.0 (1.1) (0.7) 0.2 (0.5) 0.7 0.2 14 (6) (78) 3 (2) 19 1 AustRAliAn DevelopMent pipeline foRsAYtH (75 MW) BoDAngoRA (100 MW) cHeRRY tRee (50 MW) WAlKAWAY 2 & 3 16 (400 MW) cloncuRRY solAR (6 MW) MAnilDRA solAR (50 MW) flYeRs cReeK (115 MW) WoAKWine (450 MW) cApitAl solAR (50 MW) cApitAl 2 (100 MW) WinD fARMs (pRoposeD AppRoXiMAte cApAcitY) solAR fARMs (pRoposeD AppRoXiMAte cApAcitY) 16 Infigen has a 32% equity interest Total operating costs decreased $0.2 million or 1% to $36.1 million. The key variances include: ƒ $1.0 million decrease in asset management costs due to the organisational restructure and cost saving initiatives undertaken in early 2013 (-$0.8 million) and savings in professional fees due to one-off legal costs in relation to the AEMO dispute that were incurred in pcp (-$0.2 million); ƒ $1.1 million increase in turbine O&M costs associated with higher unscheduled turbine maintenance costs at Alinta (+$0.5 million), higher variable payments due to higher generation (+$0.4 million) and higher incentive payments for exceeding contract availabilities across the wind farms with Vestas turbines (+$0.2 million); ƒ $0.7 million increase in balance of plant costs associated with scheduled maintenance programs (+$0.5 million) and higher unscheduled works (+$0.2 million); ƒ $0.2 million decrease due to lower insurance costs; and ƒ $0.7 million lower professional fees for Energy Markets activities. Operating EBITDA Operating EBITDA decreased $0.7 million or 1% to $109.3 million reflecting lower LGC prices and lower compensated revenue, slightly offset by lower operating costs – including savings in payroll costs from reduction to staff head count and professional fees that occurred in the pcp. EBITDA margin of 75.2% was in line with the prior year. Depreciation and amortisation Depreciation and amortisation (including corporate assets) increased $1.7 million to $52.6 million reflecting higher decommissioning costs, plant and IT system additions and write-offs. Infigen depreciates its Australian wind farms and associated plant using the straight line method over 25 years. Development During the year development consent was received for Bodangora and Flyers Creek wind farms in New South Wales, and Cherry Tree wind farm in Victoria. The Capital solar farm has been progressed to a very advanced stage. Work to advance the development pipeline continued in areas of wind and solar resource monitoring, connection negotiations, securing lease options and licences, and community initiatives. Options for a circa 55 km easement and to acquire land were secured to facilitate the connection of the proposed 450 MW Woakwine wind farm in South Australia. This enables access into the Victorian high voltage network. Agreement was reached with TransGrid to expand the Woodlawn connection point agreed capability to accommodate the proposed Capital solar farm and Capital 2 wind farm. Construction of the first stage of the Capital East solar farm, a solar photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage demonstration facility (approximately 130 kW) including 10 kW of solar modules from several different suppliers, was completed. The experience gained from this project will benefit future large-scale solar PV projects. MAnAgeMent Discussion AnD AnAlYsis | 25 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OUTLOOK Infigen begins the 2015 financial year (FY15) with a goal of maintaining steady operational performance, further reducing Global Facility and IEP liabilities and improving the capital structure of the business. In Australia, the acute regulatory uncertainty that has developed since the Australian Government’s appointment of a Panel to conduct another review of the legislated Renewable Energy Target (RET) has resulted in poor liquidity in the LGC market and a significant decline in LGC prices. The LGC spot market price is currently below $30 levels having traded in the low $20s in June 2014. The outlook for LGC prices remains highly uncertain, with a recovery in LGC prices predicated on lasting restoration of regulatory certainty. Wholesale electricity prices in Australia have also declined significantly following the repeal of the carbon price (which took effect from 1 July 2014) and due to demand reduction in the National Electricity Market of approximately 8% over the last five years. As a result, subject to the outcome of the RET review, the average bundled price across Infigen’s Australian portfolio is expected to be around 10% lower than FY14 based on current forward markets. In the US, average prices are expected to be only slightly higher than in FY14 due to slightly higher expected merchant prices and some indexation related increases. In FY15: ƒ US operating costs are forecast to be between US$76 and US$78 million (including Infigen Asset Management costs) ƒ Australian operating costs are forecast to be between A$36 and A$38 million (including Energy Markets costs) ƒ US production is expected to improve primarily due to improved availability across the Gamesa fleet, and ƒ Australian production is expected to be broadly in line with FY14. Cash flow to Infigen from its Class B interests in US wind farms is expected to be approximately US$33 million. Subject to the outcome of the RET review, the total cash flow that we expect to have available to repay Global Facility debt and distribute to US Class A tax equity members will be approximately $90 million. In FY15, Infigen will continue to pursue certain growth opportunities. In the US, the development team will continue to advance the solar development pipeline including new projects in California and New York. 26 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CASH FLOW Cash flow to Infigen from its Class B interests in US wind farms is expected to be approximately US$33 million. Subject to the outcome of the RET review, the total cash flow that we expect to have available to repay Global Facility debt and distribute to US Class A tax equity members will be approximately $90 million. In Australia, the development team will continue to explore opportunities that are supported by State and Territory Government initiatives. The outlook for Infigen’s Australian business is currently highly uncertain. This is primarily attributable to regulatory instability caused by the latest RET review and associated industry and political positioning and commentary. The current review commenced just 14 months after the last review was concluded. The review Panel’s report is expected to be released imminently. Recent media reports indicate that the Australian Government may be considering significant adverse changes to annual targets, subject to enactment of necessary legislation. Significant reductions to the annual targets would have a material adverse effect on the Australian renewable energy industry, including Infigen, unless appropriate grandfathering or other effective arrangements were implemented to reflect the fact that existing investments were made in good faith in pursuit of explicit Commonwealth objectives and legislation. LGC prices are currently significantly below those required to sustain existing investment or encourage new investment. If this were to continue it would likely lead to significant asset impairments across the industry, including for Infigen. Continuing depressed prices would also create significant pressure on Infigen’s capacity to meet financial covenants in our borrowing facilities. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AppENDIx A BALANCE ShEET BY COUNTrY A$ million As At 30 JUnE 2014 30 JUn 2014 iFn stAtUtory intErEst Add: Us EqUity AccoUntEd invEstmEnts lEss: Us minority intErEst 30 JUn 2014 iFn Economic intErEst AUstrAliA Cash Receivables Inventory Prepayments PPE Goodwill & intangibles Investments in financial assets & other assets Investment in associates Deferred tax assets 80.7 30.0 16.2 12.2 1,895.4 257.1 88.1 96.3 50.5 2.8 5.5 1.3 1.2 435.6 (3.5) (1.0) (96.3) – (0.6) (1.4) (0.3) (0.1) (149.8) (13.5) (0.7) – (0.1) 82.9 34.1 17.2 13.2 2,181.2 240.1 86.4 – 50.4 69.5 24.8 12.9 6.5 875.5 124.4 2.6 – 50.4 UnitEd stAtEs 13.5 9.3 4.3 6.8 1,305.6 115.7 83.8 – – Total assets 2,526.4 345.5 (166.5) 2,705.5 1,166.5 1,539.0 Payables Provisions Borrowings Tax equity (US) Deferred benefits (US) Derivative liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Foreign exchange rates As At USD EUR 32.4 22.0 1,075.0 439.4 333.3 132.3 2,034.4 492.1 2.8 7.5 1.4 190.0 143.7 – 345.5 – (2.4) (1.9) – (113.5) (48.7) – 32.8 27.6 1,076.5 515.9 428.3 132.3 (166.5) 2,213.4 – 492.1 7.4 10.9 693.6 – – 103.7 815.6 350.9 25.3 16.7 382.9 515.9 428.3 28.6 1,397.8 141.2 30 JUnE 2014 30 JUnE 2013 chAngE % 0.9420 0.6906 0.9275 0.7095 2 (3) MAnAgeMent Discussion AnD AnAlYsis | 27 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AppENDIx B INSTITUTIONAL EqUITY pArTNErShIpS Infigen holds interests in 12 limited liability companies (Institutional Equity Partnerships or IEPs), which in turn hold interests in 18 wind farm projects in the US. The capital structure of each IEP comprises Class A membership interests and Class B membership interests. Funding Each IEP is funded on a stand-alone, non-recourse basis for Class A and Class B members (Infigen is for the most part a Class B member17). The long term equity funding is contributed by Class A members and Class B members, in varying proportions – depending on the IEP, Class A Members have contributed between 50% and 80% of initial capital and the Class B members have contributed the remainder. Generally, holders of Class A membership interests are institutional investors. Accounting for IEPs Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS) preclude the use of the proportional consolidation method previously employed. For statutory purposes Infigen must now account for seven of its US joint ventures using the equity method in the “Share of net profits of associates” line item. Infigen recognises assets and liabilities of the IEPs in its AIFRS financial statements based on the following Infigen Class B interests and accounting method: institUtionAl EqUity pArtnErship rElEvAnt wind FArms inFigEn clAss b intErEst AiFrs AccoUnting 2003/2004 Portfolio Blue Canyon Windpower LLC Blue Canyon 50% Equity method Caprock Wind LLC Caprock 100% 100% Infigen holds mostly Class B membership interests. Infigen’s interest ranges from 50% to 100% of total Class B membership interests in any given IEP. Eurus Combine Hills LLC Combine Hills 50% Sweetwater Wind 1 LLC Sweetwater 1 50% Economic interests The membership interests in the IEPs have rights to two types of economic interests: ƒ Tax allocations (including taxable income/loss and production tax credits (PTCs)), and ƒ Cash distributions. The Class A and Class B members have varying entitlements to the economic interests depending on the stage that the wind farms are in during their lifespan as follows: Crescent Ridge Holdings LLC Sweetwater Wind 2 LLC Sweetwater 2 50% 2005 Portfolio JB Wind Holdings LLC Bear Creek, Jersey Atlantic Crescent Ridge 59% 75% Equity method Equity method Equity method Equity method 100% with 25% non- controlling interest mEmbErship intErEst Class A stAgE 1: Until thE EArliEr oF clAss b cApitAl rEpAid or A FixEd dAtE* All taxable income/loss and PTCs stAgE 2: AFtEr stAgE 1 And Until thE rEAllocAtion dAtE stAgE 3: post rEAllocAtion dAtE All taxable income/loss, PTCs and cash distributions Class B All cash distributions Nil Depending on the IEP, between 5%-25% of taxable income/ loss, PTCs and cash distributions Depending on the IEP, between 75%-95% of taxable income/ loss, PTCs and cash distributions * The fixed date is one that is, at the time that capital is initially contributed, expected to be later than the date by which the Class B capital is expected to be repaid The reallocation Date is the point in time that Class A capital has been returned and a target return on the Class A capital has been achieved. The target returns range between 5.9% and 8.3% depending on the IEP and accumulate based on the outstanding Class A capital balance. 28 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 Kumeyaay Holdings LLC Kumeyaay 100% 100% Sweetwater Wind 3 LLC Sweetwater 3 50% Equity method 2006 Portfolio Wind Portfolio Holdings 1 LLC 100% 100% Allegheny, Aragonne, Buena Vista, GSG, Mendota 2007 Portfolio CCWE Holdings LLC Cedar Creek 67% 100% with 33.33% non- controlling interest Sweetwater 4-5 Holdings LLC Sweetwater 4, Sweetwater 5 53% Equity method 17 In FY14 Infigen acquired certain Class A interests in wind farm entities in which it is also a Class B member. Refer to Appendix C IEP Liabilities Class A Liability (AIFRS) ƒ These are classified as a liability under AIFRS as IEPs have limited lives and the allocation of income earned is governed by contractual agreements over the life of the investment; ƒ The Class A liability is calculated by discounting future tax allocations and cash distributions using the effective interest method: – The effective interest rate that is used to calculate the liability was determined at the date that control was deemed to have been attained and is not subsequently adjusted; – Future tax allocations and cash distributions that are incorporated into the calculation of the Class A liability include those that accrue in each of the aforementioned three stages, i.e. including those post the repayment of the Class A capital balance; ƒ The Class A liability is increased or decreased for the following: COMPONENT INCREASE/DECREASE TO CLASS A LIABILITY INCOME/ EXPENSE Value of PTCs Decrease Income Tax (i)losses/(ii)gains (including tax depreciation) (i) Decrease/ (ii) Increase (i) Income/ (ii) Expense Cash distributions Decrease Allocation of return (Class A) Increase n/a Expense Movement in residual interest (Class A) (i) Increase/ (ii) Decrease (i) Expense/ (ii) Income Value of PTCs relates to the income stream that Class A members receive in the form of production tax credits. All of Infigen’s US wind farms receive one PTC for each megawatt hour of electricity produced for a period of ten years from the date of first commercial operation of the wind farm. Infigen currently forecasts that on an economic interest basis its portfolio of wind farms in which it holds Class B interests will generate a further US$158 million of PTC income. Class A Capital Balance The Class A capital balance is different to the Class A liability as the former is the balance of initial capital contributed by Class A members, plus the targeted return (which is itself different to the effective interest rate), that is yet to be repaid to Class A members through tax allocations and/or cash distributions at a given point in time. The following provides a summary of Class A capital balances. Class A Capital Balance Amortisation (US$ million) by Asset Vintage Closing balance (30 Jun 13) 2003/04 51.4 2005 86.9 2006 2007 TOTAL 153.5 230.2 522.0 Tax true-up (0.8) 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 Opening balance (1 Jul 13) Production tax credits 50.6 87.0 154.0 230.5 522.1 (13.7) (12.7) (17.0) (31.9) (75.3) Tax (losses)/gains 2.7 3.9 (0.1) 10.0 16.6 Cash distributions (9.0) (10.3) 3.8 6.7 – 9.0 (18.8) (38.0) 16.4 35.3 34.4 73.8 146.0 206.3 460.5 Allocation of return (interest) Closing balance (30 June 14) The Class A capital balance is reduced or increased for items 1 to 4 in the first table on page 30, but there is no adjustment in relation to the residual interest (item 5 in that table). Class B Liability (AIFRS) ƒ Relates to Cedar Creek and Crescent Ridge only; ƒ The Class B Liability is the equivalent of a non-controlling interest that is ordinarily recognised within equity. However, this item is classified as a liability under AIFRS because (i) the IEPs have limited lives and (ii) the allocation of income earned is governed by contractual agreements over the life of the investment; ƒ Non-controlling interests are reduced for cash distributions and increased/ decreased for the minority’s interest in the IEP’s profit/loss. US$M 2003/2004 2005 2006 2007 Total FY15 5.8 12.6 18.0 25.3 61.6 FY16 FY17 FY18 TOTAL – 5.6 18.8 26.4 50.7 – – 13.9 25.6 39.4 – – – 6.2 6.2 5.8 18.2 50.6 83.5 Deferred Revenue ƒ Represents the tax-effected difference between tax and accounting depreciation. This is similar to the accounting treatment of a deferred tax liability; ƒ Accumulates in the early years of the IEP and then reverses 158.0 slowly over the remaining life of the investment; Tax losses/gains represent an estimate of taxable losses or gains accruing to Class A members during the period. Under US tax law a wind farm owner may depreciate the book value of its wind farms over an accelerated time frame. In the early years of operations this gives rise to significant tax losses as the accelerated tax depreciation is greater than the operating profit of the wind farm. Cash distributions represent cash distributed to Class A members in Stage 2 and Stage 3. Allocation of return (Class A) is the agreed target return on the capital balance of the Class A member. The change in residual interest (Class A) reflects period on period changes in expectations of future tax allocations and cash distributions and the effect of rolling forward the Class A liability calculation each period. ƒ Does not form part of the Class A liability and is an accounting consequence of straight-lining tax depreciation over the life of the wind farm. Whilst classified as liabilities in the financial statements it is important to note: ƒ Should future operational revenues from the US wind farm investments be insufficient, there is no contractual obligation on the Group to repay the IEP liabilities; ƒ Institutional balances outstanding (Class A and Class B non-controlling interests) do not impact Infigen’s leverage covenant. There is no exit mechanism for institutional investors and consequently there is no refinancing risk. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 29 US Performance by Vintage for Year Ended 30 June 2014 Class A Capital Balance Amortisation (US$ million) by Asset Vintage chAngE chAngE % Closing balance (30 Jun 12) 2003/04 65.8 2005 95.1 2006 2007 totAl 162.0 238.6 561.5 Production (GWh) by Asset Vintage yEAr EndEd 30 JUnE 2003/2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 2014 740 511 760 1,087 2013 722 509 776 1,082 3,098 3,089 Revenue (US$ million) by Asset Vintage yEAr EndEd 30 JUnE 2003/2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 2014 22.3 22.7 46.8 53.1 22.5 24.6 42.6 53.1 144.9 142.9 18 2 (16) 5 9 2 – (2) – – (0.2) (1.9) 4.2 – 2.0 (1) (8) 10 – 1 2013 chAngE chAngE % Profit and Loss (US$ million) by Asset Vintage Revenue Costs EBITDA Depreciation & amortisation 2003/04 22.3 (12.7) 9.6 2005 22.7 (12.8) 9.9 (11.7) (12.9) 2006 46.8 (28.9) 17.8 (29.6) 2007 totAl 53.1 (19.6) 33.6 (30.8) 144.9 (74.0) 70.9 (85.1) EBIT (2.2) (2.9) (11.7) 2.8 (14.1) US Performance by Vintage for Year Ended 30 June 2013 Production (GWh) by Asset Vintage Tax true–up (0.1) 0.3 (0.1) (0.7) (0.6) Opening balance (1 July 12) Production tax credits Tax (losses)/gains Cash distributions Allocation of return (interest) Closing balance (30 June 13) 65.7 95.4 161.9 237.9 560.9 (16.2) (11.7) (18.7) (24.4) (71.1) 3.5 (7.4) 5.8 2.6 (6.6) 7.2 0.2 – 0.9 – 10.1 15.8 7.1 (13.9) 38.9 51.4 86.9 153.5 230.2 522.0 US Cash Distributions Cash flow from the operating wind farms in the US business are split between the Class A and Class B members in accordance with their entitlements during the various stages of the wind farms’ lives. Cash flow allocated to Class A members during the period was US$38.0 million compared with US$13.9 million in the pcp. This relates to the 2003/2004 and 2005 vintage portfolios and the Cedar Creek wind farm where Class A members will receive all net operating cash flow from those wind farms until their capital balances, including agreed return, are fully amortised (refer below for Class A capital balances). The following table provides a summary of Class A capital balance movements. Economic Interest Class A capital balance by vintage (US$ million) yEAr EndEd 30 JUnE 2003/2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 2013 722 509 776 1,082 3,089 2012 chAngE chAngE % 716 519 820 1,081 3,136 6 (10) (44) 1 (47) 1 (2) (5) – (1) 2005 2006 2007 Total yEAr EndEd 30 June 2003/2004 2014 34.4 73.8 146.0 206.3 2013 51.4 86.9 153.5 230.2 460.5 522.0 chAngE chAngE % 17.0 13.1 7.5 23.9 61.5 33 15 5 10 12 Revenue (US$ million) by Asset Vintage yEAr EndEd 30 JUnE 2003/2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 2013 22.5 24.6 42.6 53.1 2012 22.8 25.9 43.7 51.5 142.9 143.9 Profit and Loss (US$ million) by Asset Vintage The following table provides a summary of Class B capital balance movements. chAngE chAngE % Economic Interest Class B capital balance by vintage (US$ million) (0.3) (1.3) (1.1) 1.6 (1.0) (1) (5) (3) 3 (1) yEAr EndEd 30 June 2003/2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 2014 2013 chAngE chAngE % – 1.1 88.1 30.5 119.8 – 4.2 104.3 44.4 152.9 – 3.1 16.2 13.9 33.1 – 74 16 31 22 Revenue Costs EBITDA Depreciation & amortisation EBIT19 2003/04 22.5 (12.5) 10.0 (11.8) 2005 24.6 (13.6) 11.0 (12.9) 2006 42.6 (28.1) 14.818 (26.9) 2007 53.1 (20.5) 32.6 (29.6) totAl 142.9 (74.8) 68.4 (81.3) (2.0) (2.0) (12.1) 3.2 (12.9) Class B capital balances are held at the limited liability company (LLC) level. Once Class B capital balances are fully repaid (cash flip point) or a fixed (cash cut-off) date is reached (whichever occurs earlier), all operating cash flow from the related wind farm assets is allocated to Class A members until their capital balances are fully amortised and agreed return achieved. 30 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 18 19 Includes $0.3m gain on disposal Before impairment expense of US$55m related to the US CGU The 2006 vintage portfolio will begin to distribute cash to the Class A members no later than the end of November 2015. In the 2007 vintage portfolio Cedar Creek has already reached its cash flip point after having its Class B capital balance repaid ahead of investment case expectations. Cedar Creek accounted for 61% of the distributions from the 2007 vintage portfolio in FY14. The other wind farms in the 2007 portfolio are Sweetwater 4 & 5, which will begin to distribute cash to the Class A members no later than the end of April 2015. Once the Class A members achieve their agreed target return, the cash flow is reallocated between the Class A and Class B members. The Blue Canyon and Combine Hills wind farms (2003/04 vintage) are currently expected to return to distributing cash to Infigen as Class B member no later than July 2016, with the Caprock (2003/04 vintage) and Crescent Ridge (2005 vintage) wind farms expected to follow before December 2016 and June 2018 respectively. The Cedar Creek wind farm is currently expected to return to distributing cash to Infigen as Class B member no later than June 2019. The combined effect of the factors described above on Infigen’s portfolio of 18 US wind farms is that the aggregate distributions to Infigen diminish as Class B member as more projects reach the cash flip point or cash cut-off date (whichever occurs earlier) and more operating cash flow is directed to reducing Class A capital balances. Infigen’s aggregate Class B distributions will therefore ‘dip’ for a period until projects in the portfolio begin to reach their reallocation dates. For Infigen’s portfolio, the cash flow ‘dip’ is currently expected to be most pronounced from the second half of FY16 through to the first half of FY19. The timing and duration of the cash flow dip will be influenced by the performance of the US wind farms during the intervening period. For the Infigen Group, the effect of the cash flow ‘dip’ has been partly ameliorated following the acquisition of certain US Class A interests in FY14. Refer to Appendix C US IEPs Net Income The following table summarises the components of net income from IEPs in USD. yEAr EndEd 30 JUnE (Us$m) Value of production tax credits (Class A) Value of tax losses/(gains) (Class A) Deferred revenue recognised during the period Income from IEPs Allocation of return (Class A) Movement in residual interest (Class A) Non-controlling interest (Class B) Financing costs related to IEPs Net income from IEPs (statutory) US equity accounted investments Non-controlling interests (Class B & Class A) Net income from IEPs (economic interest) 2014 51.5 2013 chAngE % 51.8 (1) (13.3) (5.2) (156) 17.0 6.3 170 55.2 (24.2) 52.9 (26.1) 4 7 3.1 (15.2) 120 (5.5) (3.2) (26.5) (44.5) 28.7 12.8 2.5 8.4 18.2 3.4 44.0 30.0 (72) 40 242 (30) (26) 47 The following table summarises the components of net income from IEPs in AUD. yEAr EndEd 30 JUnE (A$m) Value of production tax credits (Class A) Value of tax losses (Class A) Deferred revenue recognised during the period Income from IEPs Allocation of return (Class A) Movement in residual interest (Class A) Non-controlling interest (Class B) Financing costs related to IEPs Net income from IEPs (statutory) US equity accounted investments Non-controlling interests (Class B & Class A) Net income from IEPs (economic interest) 2014 56.3 (14.7) 18.5 60.1 (26.3) 3.5 2013 chAngE % 50.2 12 (4.5) 6.3 52.0 (25.4) (15.3) (227) 194 16 (4) 123 (6.1) (3.0) (103) (28.9) (43.8) 34 31.2 8.2 280 14.4 17.8 2.8 3.3 48.4 29.3 (19) (15) 65 Value of production tax credits (Class A) was $56.3 million, up 12% or $6.1 million. By the end of 2013, Sweetwater 1, Blue Canyon and Combine Hills had passed 10 years of commercial operation and were no longer eligible to create PTCs. The value of PTCs per megawatt hour (MWh) was US$23 for the 2013 and 2014 calendar years. Value of tax gains (Class A) was a net cost of $14.7 million compared to $4.5 million in FY13 due to the reduction in tax depreciation as all of the assets that benefit from accelerated depreciation are now fully depreciated. Benefits deferred during the year also increased $12.2 million to $18.5 million, reflecting unwinding of deferred revenue during the period. Benefits deferred are the difference between tax depreciation and accounting depreciation for the year. Allocation of return (Class A) goes to delivering the agreed target return on Class A capital balances. This was a $26.3 million expense for the year, up 4% or $0.9 million reflecting unfavourable FX movements partially offset by lower Class A capital balances. The movement in residual interest (Class A) was a positive $3.5 million movement compared with a negative $15.3 million movement in the prior year. This reflects period on period changes in expectations of future tax allocations and cash flow, the difference between the actual and expected performance of the portfolio during the period, and the effect of rolling forward the Class A liability calculation by one year. Non-controlling interest (Class B) represents the share of net profit attributable to the non-controlling interest holders in the Cedar Creek and Crescent Ridge wind farms. Non-controlling interest (Class B & Class A) represents the elimination of non-controlling interest contributions of each income and financing cost IEP line item (attributable to both the Class A and Class B non-controlling interests in the Cedar Creek and Crescent Ridge wind farms). MAnAgeMent Discussion AnD AnAlYsis | 31 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AppENDIx C INvESTMENT IN CLASS A INTErESTS Class A interests in seven of the US wind farm projects were acquired by a new investment vehicle that is jointly owned by Infigen and the seller of the Class A tax equity interests. The investment vehicle apportions the vast majority of the cash flow attributable to those interests to Infigen. From an economic perspective, the effective date of the transaction was 31 October 2013. Interests acquired This transaction is recorded as “investment in financial assets” in Infigen’s financial statements and referenced as such throughout this document. Infigen also purchased 100% of the seller’s Class A interests in the Sweetwater 1 and Blue Canyon wind farm projects. Completion of this aspect of the transaction occurred in early January 2014, with an effective date of 1 January 2014 from an economic perspective. wind FArm proJEct Jersey Atlantic Bear Creek Blue Canyon Caprock Crescent Ridge Cedar Creek Sweetwater 1 Sweetwater 2 Sweetwater 3 totAl cApAcity (mw) inFigEn clAss b intErEst clAss A intErEst hEld by thE sEllEr pErcEntAgE oF thosE clAss A intErEsts AcqUirEd ppA ExpirAtion dAtE 7.5 24.0 74.3 80.0 54.5 300.0 37.5 91.5 135.0 59% 59% 50% 100% 75% 67% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 46% 31% 100% 28% 67% 30% 23% 50% March 2026 50% March 2026 December 2023 December 2024 100% 100% 100% Merchant 100% 100% 100% 100% November 2027 December 2023 February 2017 December 2017 & December 2025 Cash flow During the year the cash inflow from this investment was $16.4 million. Cash outflows comprised repayment of Union Bank borrowings related to the funding of this investment ($4.0 million) and interest expense. All of these wind farms are currently distributing cash to Class A members. The Blue Canyon wind farm (2003/04 vintage) is currently expected to cease distributing cash to Class A members no later than July 2016, with the Caprock (2003/04 vintage) and Crescent Ridge (2005 vintage) wind farms expected to follow before December 2016 and June 2018 respectively. The Cedar Creek wind farm is currently expected to cease distributing cash to Class A members no later than June 2019. The remaining wind farms are expected to start distributing cash flow to Class B members no earlier than late 2022. AppENDIx D FIvE YEAr FINANCIAL INFOrMATION The following five year information is on an economic interest basis. A$ million UnlEss othErwisE stAtEd Revenue EBITDA Depreciation & amortisation Impairments EBIT Significant items Net loss after tax Net operating cash flow Capex Cash Borrowings EUR (€ million) USD (US$ million) AUD ($ million) Gross Debt Total Borrowings Class A capital balance (US$ million) Net assets 32 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 Fy10 263.8 149.1 (127.4) – 13.8 (24.6) (74.4) 98.5 113.8 217.3 167.7 464.5 649.0 1,434.3 1,422.6 646.8 721.9 Fy11 267.6 145.6 (128.5) – 17.0 (35.0) (61.0) 49.6 85.1 303.3 133.2 458.3 655.2 1,263.7 1,252.4 605.9 640.8 Fy12 266.6 140.5 (132.6) – 7.9 – (55.9) 62.1 35.2 126.2 93.4 378.1 592.8 1,078.1 1,069.2 560.9 525.8 Fy13 286.1 158.2 (130.3) (58.4) (30.4) – (80.0) 84.2 20.5 124.0 77.5 341.2 591.2 1,069.8 1,060.0 522.1 484.0 Fy14 303.2 170.0 (141.7) – 28.3 (16.8) (8.9) 96.2 15.7 82.9 76.5 371.1 582.4 1,088.6 1,076.5 460.5 492.1 Safety aND SuStaiNability Health & safety Infigen’s first priority is the safety of our people and the communities in which we operate. Our goal is zero lost time incidents and injuries. We remain firmly committed to pursuing zero harm and reducing our 12 month lost time injury frequency rate. We continue to introduce new initiatives and enhance existing programs to assist with achieving this goal. Year ended 30 June Group TRIR1 Group LTIFR2 2014 2013 CHanGe 9.8 1.2 11.0 1.2 (1.2) – During the year, key initiatives to improve safety were: focussing on critical risk, with the first phase involving a comprehensive review of all the health and safety risks associated with the operations; and developing a collaborative approach to injury management between Infigen and contractors. Community engagement Infigen’s Community Engagement Policy, published in July 2013, sets out engagement principles (see page 5) and lists our key stakeholders. Community Engagement Spectrum Our stakeholders Infigen’s key community stakeholders are: ƒ landowners ƒ neighbours ƒ traditional owners ƒ local businesses and chambers of commerce ƒ local, regional, state or national social and environmental interest groups ƒ local schools and clubs ƒ local, regional, state or national media ƒ transmission network service providers ƒ municipal, state and federal government departments, authorities, agencies and other regulators Community Engagement Spectrum Infigen follows the community engagement guidelines based on the framework established by the International Association for Public Participation (IAPP). This is an international association that seeks to promote and improve the practice of community engagement in relation to entities that affect the public interest. The Community Engagement Spectrum based on the framework developed by the IAPP was adopted by Infigen in the 2014 financial year to: ƒ set community engagement objectives, ƒ explain the purpose of each community engagement activity, and ƒ measure Infigen’s level of engagement. Standard level HiGH level of enGaGement and CommunitY- developer relationSHip CommunitY initiation Inform Consult Involve Collaborate Empower Engagement objective ƒ Provide balanced and objective information ƒ Assist community in understanding problems, alternatives and solutions ƒ Obtain feedback on plans, options and decisions ƒ Stakeholder briefing and meetings ƒ Information sessions and collecting feedback Activities to keep promise to community ƒ Advertising and public relations ƒ Website and social media ƒ Fact sheets ƒ Display boards ƒ Planning approval Community engagement outcomes 1 Total recordable incident rate 2 Lost time injury frequency rate ƒ Work directly with the community throughout the process, from feasibility through operations and decommissioning ƒ Ensure concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered ƒ Feedback mechanisms ƒ Addressing concerns ƒ Partner with ƒ For the community community in each aspect of planning, development and decision-making, including the development of alternatives and the identification of the preferred solution ƒ Community committees ƒ Fundraising ƒ Local community relations to lead the development of the project ƒ Place final decision-making in the hands of the community ƒ Community recommended projects ƒ Community surveys ƒ Project champions in the community ƒ Working together on community projects Safety aND SuStaiNability | 33 Infigen hosted the Run with the Wind fun run for the second year to support local businesses and raise funds for local community organisations Sponsorships Infigen supports various community groups that play an important role in making life better, healthier and safer for individuals and their communities. Direct financial contributions to community activities and sponsorships totalled approximately $262,000 in the 2014 financial year. Economic sustainability Action on climate change Building relations with community groups to increase public support for tackling climate change and switching to renewable generation is important to achieve the regulatory certainty that is needed to build large-scale renewable energy assets. In Australia Infigen supported the Australians for Action project, Friends of the Earth’s RET Road Trip, and the Community Energy Coalition’s Congress in Canberra. In the US Infigen participated in the American Wind Alliance’s Windpower 2014 conference. Policy and regulatory participation Regulators make rules and regulations for all energy market participants. The role of balancing electricity supply and demand in the electricity grid and making sure market participants comply with the rules is carried out by these regulators. Infigen continues to work closely with: ƒ the Clean Energy Regulator, the Australian Energy Market Operator, the Australian Energy Market Commission and the Independent Market Operator in Australia, and ƒ the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the US. COMMUNITY SUPPORT IN THE 2014 FINANCIAL YEAR $262,000 $153,000 $88,000 $21,000 Education, arts, sports and youth organisations Local community organisations and businesses Social welfare, diversity and charities Contributions to political parties, politicians and related institutions3 YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE Australia Financial contributions4 In-kind contributions USA Financial contributions In-kind contributions 2014 ($) 2013 ($) 48,450 − 33,900 − − − − − 3 Any bodies established with the primary purpose of arranging official or unofficial funding support for political parties, their elected representatives or persons seeking political office. This definition also includes think tanks, trade associations, other support organisations linked to the creation of support for political parties, their representatives or candidates for office 4 Contributions include donations and costs associated with attending fundraising events 34 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Find Infigen’s photos and social communities on Flickr, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Diversity and People Infigen is committed to responsible corporate governance and has implemented a Diversity Policy as part of its corporate governance framework. In June 2013 Infigen endorsed diversity targets and objectives to promote diversity within Infigen. diverSitY tarGetS BY 30 June 2015 proGreSS in tHe 2014 finanCial Year ƒ Increase the workforce participation of females and persons from minority backgrounds by 10%. ƒ Increase the participation of females and persons from minority backgrounds within the professional, middle and senior management positions by 10% on a merit basis. Female participation in the Infigen workforce has increased by 7% since 1 July 2011 (when diversity targets and objectives commenced). Organisational restructure initiatives have reduced the number of professional, middle and senior management positions, therefore opportunities to increase proportion of females and persons from minority backgrounds at these levels have been limited. oBJeCtiveS proGreSS in tHe 2014 finanCial Year ƒ Complete the New and Emerging Leaders program to develop the skills needed to advance to more senior positions. The Australian Graduate School of Management's (AGSM) New and Emerging Leaders program was conducted in July and August 2013 in Australia. 6 of the 14 participants were female. ƒ Require all external recruitment processes to shortlist at least one female or other minority candidate. This has resulted in some outstanding results in both regions. In some cases candidates that had not made it to the recruitment consultant’s original shortlist have become Infigen’s preferred candidate. ƒ Engage tertiary institutions to help promote female careers in the renewable energy industry. Throughout the year Infigen sponsored and participated in the Women of Wind Energy network group in the US, University of NSW’s Women in Renewable Energy seminars in Australia, and held a staff forum with Chloe Munro, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Clean Energy Regulator, as guest speaker. ƒ Offer an Indigenous scholarship in addition to, or in substitution of, the Co-Op scholarship. Inroads is the largest non-profit source of paid internships for minority student internship programs in the US, having operated over four decades. Infigen offered an accounting and an engineering scholarship to two minority students in the 2014 financial year. Michael Combs is a founder and CEO of Career Trackers Indigenous Internships Australia. As an Inroads alumni, Michael has adopted the Inroads model throughout Australia. Career Trackers recruits pre-professional scholarship university students and links them with private sector employers to participate in a multi-year internship. Infigen offered two Australian Indigenous scholarships in the 2014 financial year. WoRKfoRCe CompoSitioN auS uSa group 66% 66% 63% 80% 77% 73% 75% 73% 69% Male Female 34% 34% 37% 20% 23% 27% 25% 27% 31% fy12 fy13 fy14 fy12 fy13 fy14 fy12 fy13 fy14 Safety aND SuStaiNability | 35 MaRvin KEitH Inroads Intern, 21, UnIversIty of HoUston- downtown, HoUston “By my sophomore year I had begun to receive training on how to conduct myself professionally in interviews and within companies. That eventually led to opportunities of interviewing with Inroads’ corporate partners by my junior year. I am very thankful and blessed to be able to be a part of an organization like Inroads that was able to match me with an amazing company like Infigen Energy to do an internship with.” SaaMER ManSooR Inroads Intern, 22, UnIversIty of texas, dallas “I wanted to intern over summer to experience what mechanical engineers really do. Applying for jobs when you do not have previous work experience seemed very challenging. I had never come across an organization like Inroads before. They helped me to improve my resume, interviewing skills, and most importantly, believing in the fact that I am a strong candidate.” WoRKfoRCe CompoSitioN by oCCupatioNal gRoup 44 31 29 12 31 3 Male Female 4 1 board 15 1 4 0 2 9 group executive Senior management middle management professional field ops Support Employee engagement During the year all Infigen employees were invited to participate in a staff engagement survey, the third survey since 2011. The survey received a 69% response, a 1% increase compared to the previous survey. The results of the survey are reviewed by the Group Executive for action in the following period. MaKing iDEaS HaPPEn Infigen’s employees are encouraged to put forward business cases for initiatives that are consistent with Infigen’s sustainability program objectives. If approved, staff are given the opportunity to implement the initiatives, which may involve them learning in areas outside their area of expertise. Infigen utilises an online collaborative application to communicate ideas and develop staff initiatives. Prospective initiatives range from new product ideas and efficiency improvements to improved methods of community engagement. As a result of one of the ideas, Infigen has reduced its office power consumption and waste. 36 | iNfigeN eNeRgy aNNual RepoRt 2014 Environment Infigen is committed to the provision of a clean and healthy environment for current and future generations. During the 2014 financial year there were no significant environmental incidents reported. Prior to the construction of a wind or a solar farm, Infigen is required to undertake comprehensive studies to determine any potential impacts to the environment and identify appropriate mitigation strategies. Specific site management activities include control of minor erosion along wind farm access roads and hardstands, weed control and ongoing avian fauna surveys and management. These environmental responsibilities are managed through the implementation of construction and operational environmental management plans. Wind farms and fauna Infigen undertakes bird and bat monitoring in order to understand the impact wind farms may be having on species of concern. The monitoring is designed to assist in making informed decisions about mitigation measures. Infigen commenced collaborating with the Clean Energy Council to compile and analyse the existing bird and bat strike data from Australian wind farms. This initiative will assist stakeholders to gain a better understanding of the relationship wind farms have on bird and bat species, and improve monitoring and mitigation strategies. Measuring our emissions footprint Infigen has adopted the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)6 framework to report on emissions and energy consumption from Infigen’s US and Australian business units. Infigen also reports under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) framework for the Australian business unit, in accordance with Australian legislation. Scope 1 (GRI indicator G4-EN15) emissions are defined as the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as a direct result of an activity from a facility such as a wind farm (for example, from diesel fuel use in vehicles on site). Scope 1 emissions of Infigen’s Australian and US wind and solar farms reduced 35% to 536 tonnes of CO2e, approximately 88.4g 7 of CO2e gases per megawatt hour generated in the 2014 financial year. Scope 1 emissions remain small relative to the size of our business. Scope 2 (GRI indicator G4-EN16) emissions are those released into the atmosphere as a result of activities at Infigen’s wind and solar farms and our offices. Examples are the emissions from the electricity used in site offices during periods of no wind. Scope 2 emissions for Infigen’s Australian and US businesses reduced by 2% to 12,694 tonnes of CO2e. Both scope 1 and scope 2 include the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Energy consumption The following types of energy (as defined in the GRI framework) apply to Infigen’s energy consumption: ƒ purchased non-renewable energy (G4-EN3a) ƒ purchased renewable energy (G4-EN3b) ƒ electricity consumption (G4-EN3c) ƒ total energy consumption (G4-EN3e) Total energy consumption of Infigen’s Australian and US operations reduced 12% to 86,461 gigajoules (GJ) in the 2014 financial year compared with the previous year, due to energy reduction initiatives such as installing low energy consumption lights implemented in late 2013. Energy consumption (GJ) GRI INDICATOR AUSTRALIA YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE G4-EN3a Purchased energy (non-renewable) 2014 4,027 2013 6,562 CHANGE % (39) G4-EN3b Purchased energy – – (renewable) G4-EN3c Electricity 12,173 12,397 consumption – (2) G4-EN3e Total energy consumption 16,200 18,959 (15) Greenhouse gas emissions GRI INDICATOR G4-EN15 (Scope 1) G4-EN16 (Scope 2) YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE (CO2E TONNES) Australia USA Group Australia USA Group Scope 1 & 2 Group 2014 216 320 536 2013 319 506 825 2,502 2,617 10,192 10,302 12,694 12,919 13,230 13,744 CHANGE % GRI INDICATOR USA YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 2013 CHANGE % (32) (37) (35) (4) (1) (2) (4) G4-EN3a Purchased energy 7,181 10,544 (32) (non-renewable) G4-EN3b Purchased energy – – (renewable) G4-EN3c Electricity 63,079 69,025 consumption – (9) G4-EN3e Total energy consumption 70,260 79,569 (12) GRI INDICATOR GROUP YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 2013 CHANGE % G4-EN3a G4-EN3b Purchased energy (non-renewable) Purchased energy (renewable) 11,209 17,106 (35) – – – (8) G4-EN3c Electricity 75,252 81,422 consumption G4-EN3e Total energy consumption 86,461 98,527 (12) FACT CHECK: HAS GLOBAL WARMING PAUSED? There is less than 1 in 100,000 chance that global average temperature over the past 60 years would have been as high without human-caused greenhouse gas emissions 5 5 Kokic, P. et al 2014, 'A probabilistic analysis of human influence on recent record global mean temperature changes', Climate Risk Management, vol. 3, pp. 1-12 6 Find out more at www.globalreporting.org 7 On an operating basis SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY | 37 INFIGEN BOARD 38 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Michael Hutchinson Non-Executive Chairman Mike was appointed an independent non-executive director of Infigen Energy in June 2009 and subsequently elected Chairman on 11 November 2010. He is also Chairman of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Mike was formerly an international transport engineering consultant, a senior Federal Government official and a corporate advisory consultant; and has extensive experience in the transport and communications sectors. Mike has previously been a non-executive director of the Australian Infrastructure Fund Ltd, Leighton Holdings Ltd, Epic Energy Holdings Ltd, Hastings Funds Management Ltd, Westpac Funds Management Ltd, Pacific Hydro Ltd, OTC Ltd, HiTech Group Australia Ltd, the Australian Postal Corporation and the Australian Graduate School of Management Ltd. Mike holds a first class honours degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, and graduated from the Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program (AMP110). He is a member of the Institutions of Civil Engineers, Highways and Transportation, and Engineers Australia, and the Australian Institute of Company Directors. Miles George Managing Director Miles is the Managing Director of Infigen Energy and has over 20 years’ experience in business development, investment, financing and management roles in the infrastructure and energy sectors in Australia, the US and Europe. Over the past 14 years Miles has been focused on development, investment, financing and management in the renewable energy industry. Miles undertook a leading role in the development of Infigen’s first wind farm project at Lake Bonney in South Australia, commencing in 2000. In 2003 Miles jointly led the team which established the renewable energy business now known as Infigen Energy. In 2005 Miles jointly led the Initial Public Offer and listing of Infigen’s business on the ASX. Following listing, Miles continued to work on the development, financing and management of Infigen’s wind farm investments in Australia, the US and Europe. He was appointed as Managing Director of Infigen Energy in 2009. Miles was elected Chairman of the Board of the Clean Energy Council in December 2013. Miles holds degrees of Bachelor of Engineering and Master of Business Administration (Distinction) from the University of Melbourne. Philip Green Non-Executive Director Philip was appointed a non-executive Director of Infigen Energy in November 2010 and is a member of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee. Philip is a Partner of The Children’s Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP (“TCI”), a substantial securityholder of Infigen Energy. Philip joined TCI in 2007 and his responsibilities include TCI’s global utility, renewable energy and infrastructure investments. Prior to joining TCI, Philip led European Utilities equity research at Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers over a 12 year period. Philip is a UK Chartered Accountant (ACA) and has a Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Geotechnical Engineering. Fiona Harris Non-Executive Director Fiona was appointed as an independent non-executive director of Infigen Energy in June 2011 and is currently Chairman of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee. Fiona is also a member of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Fiona has been a professional non-executive director for the past 19 years, during which time she has been a director of organisations across a variety of industry sectors, including utilities, financial services, resources and property, and been involved in a range of corporate transactions. Fiona spent fourteen years with KPMG, working in Perth, San Francisco and Sydney, and specialising in financial services and superannuation. She was also involved in capital raisings, due diligence, IPOs, capital structuring of transactions and litigation support. Fiona is currently Chairman of Barrington Consulting Group and a director of Sundance Resources Limited, BWP Trust and Oil Search Limited. Directorships of listed companies in the past four years are Aurora Oil & Gas Limited, Altona Mining Limited and Territory Resources Limited. Fiona holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and the Australian Institute of Company Directors. Ross Rolfe AO Non-Executive Director Ross was appointed an independent non-executive director of Infigen Energy in September 2011. Ross is a member of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee and the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Ross has broad experience in the Australian energy and infrastructure sectors in senior management, government and strategic roles. In August 2008 Ross was appointed to the position of Chief Executive Officer of Alinta Energy. Ross completed a capital restructuring of the business and stepped down from the CEO and MD role in April 2011. Prior to that appointment, Ross held the position of Director General of a range of Queensland Government Departments, including Premier and Cabinet, State Development, and Environment & Heritage, as well as the position of Co-ordinator General. Ross was also the Chief Executive Officer of Stanwell Corporation, one of Queensland’s largest energy generation companies from 2001 until 2005. Ross was previously a non-executive director of CMI Limited. Ross is currently Chairman of WDS Limited and Chairman of CS Energy, a government owned generation company based in Queensland. Ross also holds a part-time senior executive role at Lend Lease. INFIGEN BOARD | 39 INFIGEN MANAGEMENT Miles George Miles is the Managing Director of Infigen Energy and has over 20 years’ experience in business development, investment, financing and management roles in the infrastructure and energy sectors in Australia, the US and Europe. Over the past 14 years Miles has been focused on development, investment, financing and management in the renewable energy industry. Miles undertook a leading role in the development of Infigen’s first wind farm project at Lake Bonney in South Australia, commencing in 2000. In 2003 Miles jointly led the team which established the renewable energy business now known as Infigen Energy. In 2005 Miles jointly led the Initial Public Offer and listing of Infigen’s business on the ASX. Following listing, Miles continued to work on the development, financing and management of Infigen’s wind farm investments in Australia, the US and Europe. He was appointed as Managing Director of Infigen Energy in 2009. Miles was elected Chairman of the Board of the Clean Energy Council in December 2013. Miles holds degrees of Bachelor of Engineering and Master of Business Administration (Distinction) from the University of Melbourne. Chris Baveystock Chris was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Infigen Energy in March 2011, with responsibility for managing the financial risks of the business while being responsible for financial control and reporting. Additionally, he is also responsible for the investor relations, information technology and facilities functions in Australia. Chris has over 20 years of experience as a finance executive in mergers and acquisitions, acquisition integration, financing, project evaluation and review, bids and tenders, and all facets of financial reporting. His most recent roles were as Chief Financial Officer of the Tenix Group, and subsequently a number of senior finance roles at Transfield Services, including Group Financial Controller. Chris holds a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Cambridge and is a Chartered Accountant qualifying with the Institute of Chartered Accountants England & Wales (ICAEW). 40 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Brad Hopwood Brad is the Executive General Manager – Corporate Finance for Infigen Energy, with responsibility for managing the sources and uses of capital for the business, corporate activity and projects, Australian development activities and the group’s tax function. Brad has worked with Infigen Energy since 2006 and been responsible for tax, structure and corporate finance matters, as well as acquisition and divestment activities. Brad has over 20 years’ experience in advising on, managing and leading local and international structuring, acquisitions, divestments and financing transactions in a range of sectors including renewable energy, conventional electricity generation, infrastructure, telecoms, property and structured finance. Brad holds Bachelor degrees in Economics and Law and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice. Brad is also admitted in New South Wales as a (non-practising) Solicitor. Stefan Wright Stefan joined Infigen Energy in October 2009 and is the group’s General Counsel. Stefan advises the Infigen Energy Board and senior management team on legal matters and is responsible for the group’s legal function. Stefan’s previous experience includes working in Australia and the United States as both corporate and external counsel. He has advised on a wide variety of acquisitions, divestments, mergers, joint ventures, financings, debt restructurings and capital markets transactions and has been involved in the renewable energy industry since 2007. Stefan holds Bachelor degrees in Commerce and Law from the University of Adelaide and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice. INFIGEN MANAGEMENT | 41 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 43 Corporate Structure 44 ASX Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight 44 ASX Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value 47 ASX Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible decision-making 47 ASX Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting 48 ASX Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure 49 ASX Principle 6: Respect the rights of shareholders 49 ASX Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk 50 ASX Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 42 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CORPORATE STRUCTURE The Infigen Energy Group (Infigen) consists of the following entities: ƒ Infigen Energy Limited (IEL), a public company incorporated in Australia; ƒ Infigen Energy Trust (IET), a managed investment scheme registered in Australia; ƒ Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (IEBL), a company incorporated in Bermuda; and ƒ the subsidiary entities of IEL and IET. One share in each of IEL and IEBL and one unit in IET have been stapled together to form a single stapled security, tradable on the Australian Securities Exchange under the ‘IFN’ code. Infigen Energy RE Limited (IERL) is the Responsible Entity of IET. The current stapled structure of the Infigen Energy group was established immediately prior to listing on the Australian Securities Exchange in 2005 and currently cannot be materially simplified due to Infigen’s corporate debt facility (Global Facility). IEBL was established and included in the Infigen’s stapled structure in 2005 to provide flexibility regarding potential investment ownership structures. IEBL has not been utilised for that purpose since it was established and Infigen aims to wind-up this entity when it is feasible to do so. The following diagram represents the structure of the Infigen Energy group, including the entities and assets within the Global Facility borrower group. Corporate structure & Global Facility INFIGEN ENERGY SECURITYHOLDERS Stapled Securities units INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST shares INFIGEN ENERGY LIMITED shares INFIGEN ENERGY (BERMUDA) LIMITED Responsible Entity INFIGEN ENERGY RE LIMITED INFIGEN ENERGY HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED OPERATING WIND FARMS1 FINANCIAL ASSETS (US CLASS A CASH FLOWS)2 WOODLAWN WIND FARM DEVELOPMENT ASSETS Entities and assets within the Global Facility borrower group. 1. The wholly-owned subsidiaries of Infigen Energy Limited (IEL) that are Class B members in the US institutional equity partnerships (IEPs) and entitled to returns, including cash distributions, from the IEPs, are included within the Global Facility borrower group. The IEPs, which are not wholly owned, are not members of that group. 2. Through its subsidiaries, Infigen Energy Holdings Pty Limited (IEH) has provided funding to certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of IEL which in turn acquired Class A interests in relation to nine of IEL’s US operating wind farms. Like IEH, those subsidiaries of IEL are owned by a member of the Global Facility borrower group but are ‘Excluded Companies’ for the purposes of the Global Facility. CORPORATE STRUCTURE | 43 corporate governance statement continued Interaction between the roles of IEL, IEBL and IERL The Boards of IEL, IEBL and IERL (the IFN Boards) are responsible for the governance and management of Infigen. The IEL Board, in consultation and agreement with the IEBL and IERL Boards, formulates and approves the strategic direction, investment objectives and goals of Infigen in accordance with the terms of the stapling deed of 16 September 2005 (Stapling Deed). In practice, IEL was responsible for conducting the day-to-day operations of Infigen during the year. IEL will continue to consult and exchange information with and seek the agreement of IEBL and IERL when making relevant decisions in relation to Infigen. The Stapling Deed sets out the details of the relationship between IEL, IEBL and IERL in respect of Infigen. The Stapling Deed provides, to the extent permitted by law, for co-operation and alignment between these entities. It is by operation of the Stapling Deed that the Boards of IEL, IEBL and IERL are together responsible for overseeing the rights and interests of securityholders in Infigen, as well as being accountable to securityholders for the overall corporate governance and management of Infigen. asX principles and recommendations The ASX Corporate Governance Council (ASX CGC) has issued a guideline setting out corporate governance Principles and Recommendations. The ASX Listing Rules require listed entities to include a statement in their annual report disclosing the extent to which they have followed the Principles and Recommendations within the ASX CGC guideline during the reporting period. This Corporate Governance Statement is structured with reference to the second edition of the ASX CGC guideline released on 30 June 2010. Infigen has complied with the Principles and Recommendations within the ASX CGC guideline during the 2014 financial year. Relevant information required to be included in this Statement by the ASX CGC guideline has also been included. In March 2014, the ASX CGC issued a revised third edition of its corporate governance Principles and Recommendations guideline. In relation to Infigen, that third edition of the guideline applies to the 2015 financial year and will be reported against for the first time in the 2015 annual report. It is anticipated that Infigen will report compliance with the Principles and Recommendations within the third edition of the guideline. ASX Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight Companies should establish and disclose the respective roles and responsibilities of Board and management. Recommendation 1.1: Companies should establish the functions reserved to the Board and those delegated to senior executives and disclose those functions. The IFN Boards have each adopted a formal Board Charter which details the functions and responsibilities of the relevant Board and distinguishes such functions and responsibilities from those which have been delegated to management. Such delegation is non-exclusive. The Board Charters are reviewed by the IFN Boards annually. A summary of the Board Charters is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website at www.infigenenergy.com. The Boards have delegated detailed review and consideration of some of these responsibilities to their respective Committees (refer Principle 2). The Board Charters also set out the specific powers and responsibilities of the Chair and the CEO (refer Principle 2). Each IFN Board acts independently in exercising its separable responsibilities for each entity. Where there are joint responsibilities the Boards co-operate as provided for in the Stapling Deed and in accordance with relevant ASIC relief. Where appropriate, this is given effect by concurrent Board and Committee meetings to address relevant matters. The Board Charters also include an outline of the responsibilities of each Director. To assist Directors understand Infigen’s expectations of them, all Non-Executive Directors have entered into formal letters of appointment and been provided with copies of relevant Board Charters and policies. Similarly, senior executives, including the CEO and Chief Financial officer (CFO), have formal letters of employment governing their rights and responsibilities as executives within the Infigen group. Recommendation 1.2: Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of senior executives. The Nomination & Remuneration Committee of the IEL Board has the primary responsibility for setting the key performance indicators against which the performance of the CEO and other senior managers are evaluated. At the commencement of the 2014 financial year (and at other relevant times for new senior managers), individual key performance indicators were set for senior managers against which their performance would be evaluated. The key performance indicators included a mix of business performance measures and personal performance measures for each senior manager. At the mid-year and at the conclusion of the financial year, the review of the performance of senior managers is initially undertaken by the CEO and recommendations made to the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. The Nomination & Remuneration Committee undertakes a review of the performance of the CEO and considers the recommendations from the CEO regarding the performance of senior managers. The outcome of the Committee’s review is then reported through to the IEL Board. The Remuneration Report within the Directors’ Report sets out Infigen’s remuneration framework, including the key performance conditions that are assessed in determining the remuneration of the CEO and other senior managers. ASX Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value Companies should have a Board of an effective composition, size and commitment to adequately discharge its responsibilities and duties. structure of the Board Recommendation 2.1: A majority of the board should be Independent directors. The size and composition of each of the IFN Boards is determined in accordance with the Constitution of the relevant entity, the size and operations of the group and relevant corporate governance standards. It is intended that each of the IFN Boards will comprise Directors with a diverse range of skills, expertise and experience. 44 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 With reference to the criteria set out in Recommendation 2.1, the IFN Boards have assessed the independent status of each Director. The IFN Boards comprised a majority of Independent Directors throughout the 2014 financial year. There are three Independent Directors and two Non-Independent Directors currently on each of the IFN Boards. When reviewing the independence of a Director who may have a separate contractual relationship with Infigen and/or is an affiliate of a business that has a contractual relationship with IEL, the materiality threshold to be applied to the cost or fees for the good or service being provided is 5% of the revenue of IEL for the prior financial year. During the financial year and up to the date of this report, the Directors of Infigen and their respective appointment dates to the IFN Boards are set out in the table below. Appointment Dates Current Directors Position IEL Board IEBL Board IERL Board M Hutchinson Independent Chair 18 Jun 2009 18 Jun 2009 18 Jun 2009 P Green F Harris R Rolfe AO M George Non-Executive Director 1 18 Nov 2010 18 Nov 2010 18 Nov 2010 Independent Non-Executive Director 21 Jun 2011 21 Jun 2011 21 Jun 2011 Independent Non-Executive Director 9 Sep 2011 9 Sep 2011 9 Sep 2011 Executive Director 2 1 Jan 2009 1 Jan 2009 1 Jan 2009 1 Mr Green is a Partner of The Children’s Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP which has a substantial shareholding of IFN securities. 2 Mr George is Managing Director and Chief Executive officer of Infigen. Throughout the financial year, the Independent Directors or Non-Executive Directors have met to consider relevant matters, as appropriate, in the absence of Non-Independent Directors or the Executive Director, respectively. Directors are entitled to seek independent professional advice, collectively or on an individual basis (including, but not limited to, legal, accounting and financial advice), at Infigen’s expense on any matter connected with the discharge of their responsibilities, in accordance with the procedures set out in the Board Charters. Each individual Director is subject to re-election from time to time in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules and the respective Constitutions and Bye-Laws of IEL, IERL and IEBL. Recommendation 2.2: The chair should be an Independent director. The Chair of each of the IFN Boards throughout the financial year was an Independent Director. Recommendation 2.3: The roles of chair and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual. Throughout the financial year, the roles of Chair and CEO were exercised by different people for Infigen. At no stage was the Chair a former CEO of Infigen or any related party of Infigen. Nomination Committee Recommendation 2.4: The Board should establish a nomination committee. The IEL Board established a Nomination & Remuneration Committee in February 2007. In addition to its remuneration and general human resource responsibilities, that Committee is responsible for reviewing the composition of the Boards and their Committees, as well as reviewing the performance of the Boards, their Committees and individual Directors. The Committee met five times throughout the 2014 financial year. The members of the Committee and their attendance at Committee meetings are outlined in the Directors’ Report. The Committee was composed of three Independent Directors throughout the financial year. The Committee sought advice from independent advisers, as necessary. The Nomination & Remuneration Committee Charter sets out the Committee’s roles and responsibilities, composition, membership requirements and operational procedures. A summary of the Charter is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. The Charter is reviewed annually by the Committee and the Board. The IEL Nomination & Remuneration Committee will from time to time carry out, on behalf of IEBL and IERL, similar activities as the Committee is authorised by its Charter to carry out for IEL. Accordingly, the IEL Nomination & Remuneration Committee will provide advice and recommendations regarding relevant nomination and remuneration matters to the Boards of IEBL and IERL. It is intended that the Boards of IEBL and IERL may rely on those activities, advice and recommendations as if the IEL Nomination & Remuneration Committee was a committee of the IEBL and IERL Boards. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT | 45 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT CONTINUED From time to time the Nomination & Remuneration Committee assesses the relevant skills and experience of Directors to determine whether it would be of benefit and appropriate for the Infigen group to appoint an additional Director(s) to the IFN Boards. The practice of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee in relation to any search for additional Directors has involved an initial assessment of the skills and experience of the then current Directors on the IFN Boards and any of those skill and experience areas that required strengthening and/or complementing. The practice of the Committee has been to engage an external recruitment adviser to undertake a search on behalf of the IFN Boards, including focusing on candidates with energy industry and financial expertise. Candidates were short-listed by the external recruitment adviser in conjunction with the IFN Boards, interviewed initially by the external recruitment adviser and subsequently by the then current IFN Board Directors, followed by further referee and background reviews undertaken by the external recruitment adviser. It is expected that a similar nomination and appointment process would be followed for any additional IFN Board Directors. The Nomination & Remuneration Committee would also assess any Director nominations from substantial securityholders. The skills, experience and areas of expertise of the current IFN Board Directors that are relevant to Infigen are set out in the table below. Directors Skills, experience, areas of expertise M Hutchinson Engineering, communications, transportation, P Green F Harris R Rolfe AO public policy and administration, infrastructure, energy networks, energy wholesale, wind energy, asset sales, strategy, corporate governance, risk management including Health Safety and Environment (HSE), government and regulatory affairs. Engineering, accounting, corporate finance, global utilities, renewable energy and infrastructure, strategy, corporate governance, risk management including HSE, government and regulatory affairs. Commerce, accounting, mergers & acquisitions, governance, energy utilities (including generation, transmission, distribution, wholesale and retail), strategy, corporate governance, risk management including HSE. Economics, energy generation (including renewable generation), operations, transmission, development and financing, energy wholesale and retail, infrastructure, resources, manufacturing, strategy, corporate governance, risk management including HSE, government and regulatory affairs. M George Engineering, renewable energy development, financing, infrastructure, strategy, corporate governance, risk management including HSE, government and regulatory affairs. The Nomination & Remuneration Committee have reviewed the current size, skills and composition of the IFN Board and determined that it is appropriate for Infigen in the current operating environment. If additional resources were required or a vacancy occurred, the Board would consider a broad range of candidates including those with direct experience in the US market, energy retailing and distribution, renewable energy technology and information management technology. In line with Infigen’s diversity objectives, which are not limited to gender, we would look to further strengthen diversity on the Board. Recommendation 2.5: Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and individual directors. In the 2013 financial year, the Nomination & Remuneration Committee engaged an independent consultant firm to undertake a Board effectiveness review. The review involved an assessment of the following key elements of Board effectiveness: strategic direction and alignment; engagement alignment; composition and structure; and dynamic and culture. The conduct of the review involved: ƒ direct interaction with each member of the Board through the completion of surveys and face to face interviews; ƒ direct interaction with the senior management team through the completion of surveys and face to face interviews; ƒ comparison of the Infigen governance structure against the Board structure of organisations with comparable market capitalisation/revenues; and ƒ reference to the independent consultant’s own insights and knowledge of best practices adopted by the Boards of leading organisations. The overall assessment of the IFN Board effectiveness was positive with some areas for development identified. With an extensive external review of Board effectiveness conducted in the 2013 financial year, it was determined that an internal performance evaluation be conducted in the 2014 financial year. The process undertaken to evaluate the performance of the Board, its committees and individual Directors included identifying relevant areas to be covered during the review, completion of surveys by participants, collation and distribution of survey data, and subsequent consideration of the information by the Board to identify further areas of development. It is Board and Committee practice that individual Directors do not participate in the review of their own performance, nor participate in any vote regarding their election, re-election or Committee membership. In relation to Directors who are due for re-election at the Annual General Meeting, the Nomination & Remuneration Committee considers the performance of the relevant Directors and provides a recommendation to the IEL and IEBL Boards. 46 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ASX Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible decision‑making Companies should actively promote ethical and responsible decision‑making. code of conduct Recommendation 3.1: Companies should establish a code of conduct and disclose the code or a summary of the code as to: ƒ the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the company’s integrity ƒ the practices necessary to take into account their legal obligations and the reasonable expectations of their stakeholders ƒ the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices. The IFN Boards have adopted a formal Code of Conduct which is designed to ensure that high standards of professional and ethical behaviour are observed by all Directors and employees in relation to Infigen’s activities. The Code of Conduct requires Directors and employees, among other things, to: ƒ avoid conflicts of interest between their personal interests and those of Infigen and its securityholders; ƒ not take advantage of opportunities arising from their position for personal gain or in competition with Infigen; and ƒ comply with corporate policies. Infigen encourages ethical behaviour and provides protection for those who report any actual or potential breach of legal requirements, the Code of Conduct or other Infigen policies. A summary of the Code of Conduct is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. A copy of Infigen’s Securities Trading Policy is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. diversity policy Recommendation 3.2: Companies should establish a policy concerning diversity and disclose the policy or a summary of that policy. The policy should include requirements for the board to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and for the board to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them. The IFN Boards have adopted a Diversity Policy which includes requirements for Infigen to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them. During preparation of the policy, the Board and management actively sought input from all employees to help define the meaning and value of diversity as it related to Infigen. At Infigen, we respect those differences that people bring to the organisation that have an influence on individual identities and perspectives, including gender, ethnicity, religious beliefs, age, sexuality, disability and family responsibilities. We aim to promote a culture that encourages diversity, where our employees benefit from exchanging ideas and learning from each other in order to capture the benefits of diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives. A summary of the Diversity Policy is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. Recommendation 3.3: Companies should disclose in each annual report the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving them. The Diversity policy includes requirements for Infigen to establish measurable objectives for achieving diversity, including gender diversity. The measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and the progress towards achieving those objectives are included in the Sustainability Report within the Annual Report. Recommendation 3.4: Companies should disclose in each annual report the proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and women on the board. The relevant information for Infigen is included in the Sustainability Report within the Annual Report. ASX Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting Companies should have a structure to independently verify and safeguard the integrity of their financial reporting. audit, risk & compliance committee Recommendation 4.1: The board should establish an audit committee. The IFN Boards have each established an Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee. In practice the Committees generally hold concurrent meetings. The IFN Boards have delegated the responsibility for overseeing the establishment and maintenance of Infigen’s system of internal control to the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees. The Committees oversee the financial reporting process, the systems of internal control and risk management, the audit process and Infigen’s processes for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations. The Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees oversee the implementation of the system of risk management at Infigen, ensuring that management has a process in place so that risks are identified, assessed and properly managed. The Committees also monitor compliance by Infigen with its various licensing and other obligations, including specific obligations associated with managed investment scheme requirements. On behalf of the IFN Boards, the Committees review the performance of the external auditor and monitor any non-audit services proposed to be provided to Infigen by the external auditor to ensure external audit independence is maintained. Recommendation 4.2: The audit committee should be structured so that it: ƒ consists only of non‑executive directors ƒ consists of a majority of independent directors ƒ is chaired by an independent chair, who is not the chair of the board ƒ has at least three members. Throughout the 2014 financial year, each Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee of the IFN Boards comprised only Non-Executive Directors, with a majority being Independent Directors. The Chair of the Committees was not the Chair of the IFN Boards. CoRpoRAte goVeRnAnCe StAteMent | 47 corporate governance statement continued Each Committee comprised three Non-Executive Directors, with two being Independent Directors. The non-independent Director on the Committee is a nominee of a substantial securityholder. In the interests of a separation of roles and having regard to the size of the IFN Boards and to skills and experience, it was preferred to have a non-independent Director on the Committee than having the Board Chairman continue to serve on the Committee. Further, the IFN Boards assess Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee outcomes carefully to ensure that they are in the interest of the Infigen group as a whole, and as such no issues in that respect have arisen. The Board Chairman nonetheless attends certain Committee meetings as an observer, at the invitation of the Committee Chair where that may facilitate interaction between the Committee and the Board. There were four formal Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee meetings held during the 2014 financial year. The attendance of Committee members at meetings is set out in the Directors’ Report. All Committee members possessed the requisite financial expertise and experience necessary to undertake the responsibilities of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees. All members have an understanding of the energy industry and extensive accounting/finance knowledge and experience. Further details of the experience and qualifications of each Committee member are set out in the Directors’ Report. Recommendation 4.3: The audit committee should have a formal charter. The IFN Boards have adopted a Charter for each of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees that sets out the role and responsibilities, composition, structure, membership requirements and other relevant procedures for the Committees. A summary of the Charter is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. The Committees meet periodically and report to the IFN Boards following each Committee meeting, including in respect of recommendations of the Committees that require IFN Board consideration. audit governance Infigen’s external auditor is PricewaterhouseCoopers, appointed by securityholders at the 2006 Annual General Meeting. The IFN Boards have a policy whereby the responsibilities of each of the lead audit engagement partner and review audit partner cannot be performed by the same people for a period in excess of five consecutive years. In 2013, Darren Ross completed five years as the PricewaterhouseCoopers lead audit engagement partner. Marc Upcroft was the lead audit engagement partner for the 2014 financial year. Similarly, John Feely replaced Michael O’Donnell as the audit review partner for the 2014 financial year. The external auditor routinely attends Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee meetings. Periodically, the Committees meet with the external auditor without management being present, and the Committees also meet with management without the external auditor being present. The Chair of the Committee liaises with the auditor outside formal meetings, as necessary. Committee members are able to contact the external auditor directly at any time. Certification and discussions with the external auditor on independence The Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees require that the external auditor confirm each half year that it has maintained its independence and has complied with applicable independence standards. The Committees annually review the independence of the external auditor and notify this assessment to the IFN Boards. A copy of the external auditor’s annual certification of independence is set out in the Annual Report. Restrictions on non-audit services by the external auditor The external auditor is not permitted to carry out certain types of non-audit services for Infigen, including: ƒ bookkeeping or other services relating to the accounting records or financial statements; ƒ appraisal or valuation services; ƒ secondments to management positions; ƒ internal audit of financial controls; ƒ internal control design or implementation; ƒ implementation or design of financial information systems or other information technology systems; ƒ legal or litigation support services; and ƒ strategic or structural tax planning. For all other non-audit services, any use of the external audit firm must be pre-approved by the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees, or by delegated authority to a sub-committee consisting of one or more members of the Committee, where appropriate. The breakdown of the aggregate fees invoiced by the external auditor in respect of each of the two most recent financial years for audit and other services is provided in Note 8 accompanying the Financial Statements in the Annual Report. ASX Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure Companies should promote timely and balanced disclosure of all material matters concerning the company. continuous disclosure policy Recommendation 5.1: Companies should establish written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance and disclose those policies or a summary of those policies. Infigen has adopted a Continuous Disclosure Policy which is periodically reviewed. That policy seeks to ensure that all securityholders and potential investors have equal and timely access to material information concerning Infigen unless it falls within the scope of the exemptions contained in Listing Rule 3.1A. The IFN Boards are actively and routinely involved in discussing disclosure obligations and reviewing disclosure material in respect of significant Infigen matters. Each Board meeting includes explicit consideration of any potentially disclosable information. The Company Secretary is primarily responsible for communications with the ASX and for overseeing and maintaining the Continuous Disclosure Policy. A summary of the Continuous Disclosure Policy is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. 48 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 From time to time Infigen conducts analyst and investor briefings and in these situations the following protocols apply: ƒ no price sensitive information will be disclosed at those briefings unless it has been previously, or is simultaneously, released to the market; ƒ questions at these briefings that relate to price sensitive information not previously disclosed will be answered only through an appropriate ASX/market announcement; and ƒ if any price sensitive information is inadvertently disclosed, it will be immediately released to the ASX/market and placed on Infigen’s website. Securityholders are encouraged to attend and participate in general meetings of Infigen, particularly the Annual General Meeting. Infigen provides securityholders with details of proposed meetings and meeting materials well in advance of the relevant dates. Infigen’s external auditor attends the Annual General Meeting and is available to answer securityholder questions regarding the conduct of the external audit and the preparation and content of the auditor’s report. This allows securityholders an opportunity to ask questions of the auditor and reinforces the auditor’s accountability to securityholders. ASX Principle 6: Respect the rights of shareholders Companies should respect the rights of shareholders and facilitate the effective exercise of those rights. communications with shareholders Recommendation 6.1: Companies should design a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and encouraging their participation at general meetings and disclose their policy or a summary of that policy. Infigen has a formal Communications Policy that aims to promote effective communication with all stakeholders. A summary of the policy is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. An extensive program of information is made available to securityholders and potential investors throughout the year, including via ASX/market releases, direct mailing, electronic alerts, briefings, presentations and via Infigen’s website. Consistent with Infigen’s Continuous Disclosure Policy, Infigen is committed to communicating with its securityholders effectively and promptly to provide ready access to information relating to Infigen. Infigen’s website (www.infigenenergy.com) provides access to information for securityholders and other potential investors, including: ƒ the Board, management and corporate governance framework and policies; ƒ the portfolio of operating assets and development pipelines; ƒ copies of all market announcements and media releases from Infigen; ƒ Annual Reports, other half and full year financial reporting, and relevant investor information regarding distributions and taxation; ƒ information regarding sustainability and renewable energy, including our commitment to safety, the environment and the communities in which we participate; ƒ a link to the website of Infigen’s security registry, Link Market Services Limited; and ƒ a subscriber facility where participants receive updated information alerts regarding Infigen. Infigen encourages securityholders to utilise its website as their primary tool to access securityholder information and disclosures. In addition, the Annual Report facilitates the provision to securityholders of detailed information in respect of the major achievements, financial results and strategic direction of Infigen. Advance notice of significant group briefings and details regarding the various methods to access and participate in these briefings are circulated broadly. Records are kept in relation to investor and analyst briefings. ASX Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk Companies should establish a sound system of risk oversight and management and internal control. Recommendation 7.1: Companies should establish policies for the oversight and management of material business risks and disclose a summary of those policies. Infigen has adopted a Risk Management Policy consistent with International Standard ISO 31000. Infigen is committed to ensuring that its system of risk oversight, management and internal control is consistent with its business strategy and sound commercial practice. Infigen aims to ensure its culture and processes facilitate realisation of Infigen’s business objectives in tandem with appropriate identification and management of business risks. In relation to health safety and environment risks, Infigen has established regional safety and sustainability committees to ensure implementation of appropriate safety procedures and a system of ongoing environmental and safety improvement programs. In particular, the IFN Boards and management aim to promote an internal culture whereby the health and safety of employees, contractors and visitors to Infigen offices and asset sites is paramount. The IFN Boards are ultimately responsible for overseeing and managing the material risks of Infigen. The Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees assist the Boards in this role. In accordance with their Charters, the role of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees includes reviewing the system for identifying, managing and monitoring the key risks of the Infigen group. The Committees also consider reports from the Risk Manager and other senior managers regarding the status of key risk exposures and any material incidents. This enables the Committees to ensure the IFN Boards are informed of all material business risks. The Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees have also implemented a robust internal audit program. A summary of Infigen’s Risk Management Policy is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. Recommendation 7.2: The board should require management to design and implement the risk management and internal control system to manage the company’s material business risks and report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. The board should disclose that management has reported to it as to the effectiveness of the company’s management of its material business risks. Infigen’s Risk Manager is responsible for the ongoing development and maintenance of an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework consistent with International Standard ISO 31000. The Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees receive routine and exception reports on material business risks. The Risk Management Policy and ERM framework define the processes and responsibilities for managing business risks. As part of the ERM framework, senior management prepare and maintain functional risk registers. A principal aim of the CoRpoRAte goVeRnAnCe StAteMent | 49 corporate governance statement continued ERM framework is to engage management to accept direct accountability for the identification and management of the business risks and the corresponding internal controls within their areas of responsibility. Senior managers regularly monitor the effectiveness of the controls implemented to manage the business risks identified. To ensure ongoing promotion of an ERM focused culture within Infigen, an Enterprise Risk Management Committee was established in 2012. This is a management committee that meets more regularly than the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee of the Board. The Committee assesses Infigen’s material risks at an enterprise level as well as conducting regular reviews of risk management policies, registers and procedures. The material risks for Infigen’s business, including operational, financial and strategic risks, are identified within the overarching Top Risks register for the group. This Top Risks register is populated by an assessment of the business risks identified within the functional risk registers, project specific registers (e.g. construction projects) and site specific risk registers for operating assets. These material business risks are actively monitored and managed. In consultation with relevant functional managers, the Top Risks register is updated by the Risk Manager and reviewed by the Enterprise Risk Management Committee at each meeting. The updated risk register is subsequently reported to and reviewed by the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees. This process involves confirmation of the effectiveness of Infigen’s management of its material business risks. internal audit The IFN Boards have overall responsibility for Infigen’s systems of internal control, supported by the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees and management. The IFN Boards and Committees are assisted by Infigen’s Internal Audit function in assessing the adequacy of the internal control system. The Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees have adopted a Charter for the Internal Audit function. On an annual basis, and following a risk-based assessment of the group, the Internal Audit Manager prepares and presents an Internal Audit plan to the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees. The annual Internal Audit plan aims to review the adequacy and effectiveness of the relevant internal control systems identified in the plan. Following completion of each Internal Audit review undertaken throughout the year, the Internal Audit Manager presents a report of the findings and recommendations at the subsequent meeting of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees. The Internal Audit Manager regularly liaises with the external auditor and also provides copies of Internal Audit reports to the external auditor. Recommendation 7.3: The board should disclose whether it has received assurance from the chief executive officer (or equivalent) and the chief financial officer (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the corporations act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks. The CEO and CFO have provided written assurance to the IFN Boards that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks during the 2014 financial year. The written assurance is based on senior management reviews and sign-off, as well as enquiry by the CEO and CFO as appropriate. ASX Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly Companies should ensure that the level and composition of remuneration is sufficient and reasonable and that its relationship to performance is clear. Information regarding the policies and principles which are applied to determine the nature and amount of remuneration paid to the Directors and management of Infigen are set out in detail in the Remuneration Report. remuneration committee Recommendation 8.1: The Board should establish a remuneration committee. The IEL Board has established a Nomination & Remuneration Committee. The Committee met five times throughout the 2014 financial year. The members of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee and their attendance at Committee meetings are listed in the Directors’ Report. The IEL Board has adopted a Charter for the Nomination & Remuneration Committee that sets out the Committee’s roles and responsibilities, composition, membership requirements and operational procedures. A summary of the Charter is available in the Corporate Governance section on Infigen’s website. Further information regarding the responsibilities of the Committee is outlined in the response to Recommendation 2.4. Recommendation 8.2: The remuneration committee should be structured so that it: ƒ consists of a majority of independent directors ƒ is chaired by an independent chair ƒ has at least three members. Throughout the 2014 financial year, the IEL Nomination & Remuneration Committee was composed solely of three Independent Directors and was therefore chaired by an Independent Director. Recommendation 8.3: Companies should clearly distinguish the structure of non‑Executive directors’ remuneration from that of Executive directors and senior executives. The remuneration structure and amounts paid to Non-Executive Directors, the Managing Director and senior executives for the 2014 financial year are set out in detail in the Remuneration Report. Non-Executive Directors are not provided with retirement benefits, other than statutory superannuation, and do not receive options, performance rights, other equity incentives or bonus payments. The Securities Trading Policy prohibits employees entering into financial arrangements that limit the economic risk of an employee’s holding of vested or unvested IFN securities, options over IFN securities, or performance rights associated with IFN securities. 50 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 DIRECTORS’ REPORT The Directors of Infigen Energy Limited (“IEL”) and the Directors of Infigen Energy RE Limited (“IERL”), the Responsible Entity of Infigen Energy Trust (“IET”), present their report together with the Financial Report of the Group and the Trust (refer below) for the year ended 30 June 2014. The Financial Report of IEL comprises the consolidated Financial Report of IEL and its controlled entities, including IET and its controlled entities and Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (“IEBL”), (the “Infigen Energy Group” or “Group”). The Financial Report of IET comprises the consolidated Financial Report of IET and its controlled entities (the “Infigen Energy Trust Group” or “Trust”). Directors The following people were Directors of IEL, IEBL and IERL in its capacity as Responsible Entity of IET, during the whole of the financial year and up to the date of this report: ƒ Michael Hutchinson ƒ Philip Green ƒ Fiona Harris ƒ Ross Rolfe AO ƒ Miles George Further Information on Directors The particulars of the Directors of IEL, IERL and IEBL at or since the end of the financial year and up to the date of the Directors’ Report are set out below. Name Particulars Michael Hutchinson Non-Executive Chairman of IEL, IEBL and IERL Appointed to IEL, IEBL and IERL on 18 June 2009 Chairman of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee Philip Green Non-Executive Director of IEL, IEBL and IERL Appointed to IEL, IEBL and IERL on 18 November 2010 Member of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee Fiona Harris Non-Executive Director of IEL, IEBL and IERL Appointed to IEL, IEBL and IERL on 21 June 2011 Chairman of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee Member of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee Mike was appointed an independent non-executive director of Infigen Energy in June 2009 and subsequently elected Chairman on 11 November 2010. He is also Chairman of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Mike was formerly an international transport engineering consultant, a senior Federal Government official and a corporate advisory consultant; and has extensive experience in the transport and communications sectors. Mike has previously been a non-executive director of the Australian Infrastructure Fund Ltd, Leighton Holdings Ltd, Epic Energy Holdings Ltd, Hastings Funds Management Ltd, Westpac Funds Management Ltd, Pacific Hydro Ltd, OTC Ltd, HiTech Group Australia Ltd, the Australian Postal Corporation and the Australian Graduate School of Management Ltd. Mike holds a first class honours degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, and graduated from the Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program (AMP110). He is a member of the Institutions of Civil Engineers, Highways and Transportation, and Engineers Australia, and the Australian Institute of Company Directors. Philip was appointed a non-executive Director of Infigen Energy in November 2010 and is a member of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee. Philip is a Partner of The Children’s Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP (“TCI”), a substantial securityholder of Infigen Energy. Philip joined TCI in 2007 and his responsibilities include TCI’s global utility, renewable energy and infrastructure investments. Prior to joining TCI, Philip led European Utilities equity research at Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers over a 12 year period. Philip is a UK Chartered Accountant (ACA) and has a Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Geotechnical Engineering. Fiona was appointed as an independent non-executive director of Infigen Energy in June 2011 and is currently Chairman of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee. Fiona is also a member of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Fiona has been a professional non-executive director for the past 19 years, during which time she has been a director of organisations across a variety of industry sectors, including utilities, financial services, resources and property, and been involved in a range of corporate transactions. Fiona spent fourteen years with KPMG, working in Perth, San Francisco and Sydney, and specialising in financial services and superannuation. She was also involved in capital raisings, due diligence, IPOs, capital structuring of transactions and litigation support. Fiona is currently Chairman of Barrington Consulting Group and a director of Sundance Resources Limited, BWP Trust and Oil Search Limited. Directorships of listed companies in the past four years are Aurora Oil & Gas Limited, Altona Mining Limited and Territory Resources Limited. Fiona holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and the Australian Institute of Company Directors. DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 51 DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED Name Particulars Ross Rolfe AO Non-Executive Director of IEL, IEBL and IERL Appointed to IEL, IEBL and IERL on 9 September 2011 Member of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee Member of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee Ross was appointed an independent non-executive director of Infigen Energy in September 2011. Ross is a member of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee and the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Ross has broad experience in the Australian energy and infrastructure sectors in senior management, government and strategic roles. In August 2008 Ross was appointed to the position of Chief Executive Officer of Alinta Energy. Ross completed a capital restructuring of the business and stepped down from the CEO and MD role in April 2011. Prior to that appointment, Ross held the position of Director General of a range of Queensland Government Departments, including Premier and Cabinet, State Development, and Environment & Heritage, as well as the position of Co-ordinator General. Ross was also the Chief Executive Officer of Stanwell Corporation, one of Queensland’s largest energy generation companies from 2001 until 2005. Ross was previously a non-executive director of CMI Limited. Ross is currently Chairman of WDS Limited and Chairman of CS Energy, a government owned generation company based in Queensland. Ross also holds a part-time senior executive role at Lend Lease. Miles George Executive Director of IEL, IEBL and IERL Appointed to IEL, IEBL and IERL on 1 January 2009 Miles is the Managing Director of Infigen Energy and has over 20 years’ experience in business development, investment, financing and management roles in the infrastructure and energy sectors in Australia, the US and Europe. Over the past 14 years Miles has been focused on development, investment, financing and management in the renewable energy industry. Miles undertook a leading role in the development of Infigen’s first wind farm project at Lake Bonney in South Australia, commencing in 2000. In 2003 Miles jointly led the team which established the renewable energy business now known as Infigen Energy. In 2005 Miles jointly led the Initial Public Offer and listing of Infigen’s business on the ASX. Following listing, Miles continued to work on the development, financing and management of Infigen’s wind farm investments in Australia, the US and Europe. He was appointed as Managing Director of Infigen Energy in 2009. Miles was elected Chairman of the Board of the Clean Energy Council in December 2013. Miles holds degrees of Bachelor of Engineering and Master of Business Administration (Distinction) from the University of Melbourne. Directors’ Interests in IFN Stapled Securities One share in each of IEL and IEBL and one unit in IET have been stapled together to form a single stapled security, tradable on the Australian Securities Exchange under the ‘IFN’ code. IERL is the Responsible Entity of IET. The table below lists the Directors of IEL, IEBL and IERL during the financial year as well as showing the relevant interests of those Directors in IFN stapled securities during the financial year. Directors Role M Hutchinson Independent Chairman F Harris P Green 1 R Rolfe M George Independent Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director Independent Non-Executive Director Balance 1 July 2013 192,500 100,000 0 0 IFN Stapled Securities Held Acquired during the year Sold during the year Balance 30 June 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192,500 100,000 0 0 1,726,995 Executive Director 650,000 1,076,995 2 1 P Green is a Partner of The Children’s Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP which has a substantial shareholding of IFN securities. Mr Green has advised Infigen that he does not have a relevant interest in those IFN securities. 2 The IFN securities acquired by M George during the year resulted from the vesting of Performance Rights relating to Short Term Incentives earned in FY12. 52 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Directors’ Meetings The number of Board meetings and meetings of standing Committees established by the respective Boards held during the year ended 30 June 2014, and the number of meetings attended by each Director, are set out below. Board Meetings Committee Meetings IEL IERL IEBL Audit, Risk & Compliance IEL Nomination & Remuneration Directors M Hutchinson F Harris P Green R Rolfe M George A 16 16 16 15 16 B 16 16 16 16 16 A 10 10 10 10 10 B 10 10 10 10 10 A 10 10 10 10 10 B 10 10 10 10 10 A n/a 4 4 4 B n/a 4 4 4 n/a n/a A 5 5 n/a 5 n/a B 5 5 n/a 5 n/a A = Number of meetings attended. B = Number of meetings held during the year. Additional meetings of committees of Directors were held during the year, but these are not included in the above table, for example where the Boards delegated authority to a committee of Directors to approve specific matters or documentation on behalf of the Boards. Company Secretary The name and particulars of the Company Secretary of IEL, IERL and IEBL at or since the end of the financial year are set out below. Name Particulars David Richardson Company Secretary of IEL, IEBL and IERL Appointed 26 October 2005 David is the General Manager Corporate Governance & Company Secretary of Infigen Energy and is responsible for the company secretarial, risk management, insurances, corporate compliance and internal audit functions. David joined Infigen Energy as Company Secretary in 2005. David was previously a Company Secretary within the AMP Group, including AMP Capital Investors, Financial Services and Insurance divisions, as well as prior financial services sector and regulatory positions. David holds a Diploma of Law, Bachelor of Economics and a Graduate Diploma in Company Secretarial Practice. David is a Member of the Governance Institute of Australia. Principal Activities (i) Infigen Energy Group The Infigen Energy Group is a specialist renewable energy business that develops, constructs, owns and operates energy generation assets. Infigen currently has interests in 24 operating wind farms and a pipeline of wind and solar renewable energy developments in Australia and the United States. With a total installed capacity in excess of 1,600 MW (on an equity interest basis), the business currently generates over 4,500 GWh of renewable energy per year. Infigen has six operating wind farms in Australia with a total installed capacity of 557 MW. Infigen’s US business comprises 18 operating wind farms with a total installed capacity of 1,089 MW (Class B interest). (ii) Infigen Energy Trust Group During the reporting period, IET held interests in financial investments. In 2005, the units issued in IET were stapled to the shares issued by IEL and IEBL to form ‘stapled securities’. Since 2005, IET has raised the majority of the equity capital for the Group as part of the issue and listing of stapled securities on the Australian Securities Exchange. IET has also been the stapled entity that has enabled distributions to be paid to securityholders since that time. Review of Operations (i) Infigen Energy Group Revenue and results During the year ended 30 June 2014, the Group recorded revenues from continuing operations of $273.3 million compared with $259.7 million (restated) in FY13, representing an increase of approximately 5%. The Group recorded a statutory net loss for FY14 of $8.9 million compared to a net loss for FY13 of $80.0 million. The FY14 net loss was a $71.1 million (89%) improvement compared to the prior year. DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 53 Directors’ report continueD US Business Infigen has an operating capacity of 1,089 MW (Class B interests) in the United States comprising 18 wind farms. Approximately 80% of Infigen’s US capacity is contracted for a weighted average duration of 10.5 years. Key achievements in the US Business during the year included: ƒ delivery of steady operating costs within the guidance range of US$73–$76 million; ƒ the acquisition of US Class A interests, improving total cash flow to the business; ƒ the profitable sale of Wildwood I and Pumpjack solar PV development projects; and ƒ enhancement of the solar development pipeline, which now accounts for over 780 MW of late, mid and early-stage projects across six states. Australian Business Infigen has an operating capacity of 557 MW in Australia comprising six wind farms, namely the 89.1 MW Alinta wind farm in WA, the three Lake Bonney wind farms in SA with capacities of 80.5 MW, 159 MW and 39 MW respectively, and the 140.7 MW Capital and 48.3 MW Woodlawn wind farms in NSW. Infigen holds a 100% equity interest in each of its Australian wind farms. There was no change to Infigen’s operating capacity in Australia during FY14. Of Infigen’s six operational wind farms in Australia, 40% of annual P50 production is currently contracted under medium and long term agreements. Key achievements in the Australian Business during the year included: ƒ strong operating EBITDA performance in a challenging market driven by improved wind conditions and delivering operating costs within the guidance range of $35–$37 million; ƒ improved operational performance from generation assets through enhanced energy market activities and aligning Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) servicing to market conditions; ƒ Capital East solar demonstration facility – the first stage (approximately 130 kW) of the facility was completed and registered as a generator with AEMO in September 2013; and ƒ development approvals received for Bodangora, Cherry Tree and Flyers Creek wind farms with a total proposed installed capacity of approximately 300 MW. (ii) Infigen Energy Trust Group The loss attributable to unitholders of IET for the year ended 30 June 2014 was $646,000 compared to a similar loss of $646,000 for the prior year. Further commentary regarding the Group and Trust’s operating and financial performance for the year is included in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial and Operational Performance Report. Distributions On 14 June 2011, Infigen advised that no FY11 final distribution would be paid and distributions would be suspended for FY12 and FY13. That initiative aimed to maximise the capital available to Infigen to repay debt and fund future opportunities. As advised at subsequent Infigen Annual General Meetings, the sweeping of surplus cash flows from operating assets held within the Global Facility borrower group to repay debt, effectively serves to continue to preclude the payment of distributions to securityholders. Further details regarding distributions are set out in Note 24 to the Financial Statements. infigen energy trust As at 30 June 2014, IET had 764,993,434 units on issue. During FY14 an additional 2,727,462 units were issued by IET. These units were issued on 27 August 2013 in accordance with the Infigen Energy Equity Plan relating to vesting of FY12 Deferred STI obligations. During FY14 the responsible entity of IET, Infigen Energy RE Limited, did not hold any units in IET. As at 30 June 2014, IET held assets of $743 million (30 June 2013: $742 million). Further details regarding the assets held by IET during the financial year are set out in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and relevant Notes to the Financial Statements, including the basis for valuation of the assets as disclosed in Note 1. changes in state of Affairs During the year the development teams in the US and Australia continued to advance the key projects in the wind and solar PV development pipelines. A number of solar PV development projects in the US and Australia are at advanced stages. A number of wind farm development projects in Australia are also at an advanced stage awaiting improved market and investment conditions. A key area of focus for the development teams has been managing community, regulatory and other stakeholder relationships. Other changes in the state of affairs for the year are included in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial and Operational Performance Report. subsequent events Since the end of the financial year, there have not been any transactions or events of a material or unusual nature likely to affect significantly the operations or affairs of Infigen in future financial periods. 54 | InfIgEn EnERgY AnnuAl REPORT 2014 Future Developments In relation to costs and production for FY15: ƒ US operating costs are forecast to be between US$76 and US$78 million (including Infigen Asset Management costs); ƒ Australian operating costs are forecast to be between A$36 and A$38 million (including Energy Markets costs); ƒ US production is expected to improve primarily due to improved availability across the Gamesa fleet; and ƒ Australian production is expected to be broadly in line with FY14. The outlook for Infigen’s Australian business is currently highly uncertain. This is primarily attributable to regulatory instability caused by the latest review of the Renewable Energy Target (RET) and associated industry and political positioning and commentary. The current review commenced just 14 months after the last review was concluded. The review Panel’s report is expected to be released imminently. Recent media reports indicate that the Australian Government may be considering significant adverse changes to annual targets, subject to enactment of necessary legislation. Significant reductions to the annual targets would have a material adverse effect on the Australian renewable energy industry, including Infigen, unless appropriate grandfathering or other effective arrangements were implemented to reflect the fact that existing investments were made in good faith in pursuit of explicit Commonwealth objectives and legislation. LGC prices are currently significantly below those required to sustain existing investment or encourage new investment. If this were to continue it would likely lead to significant asset impairments across the industry, including for Infigen. Continuing depressed prices would also create significant pressure on Infigen’s capacity to meet financial covenants in our borrowing facilities. environmental regulations To the best of the Directors’ knowledge, Infigen has complied with all significant environmental regulations applicable to its operations. indemnification and insurance of officers Infigen has agreed to indemnify all Directors and Officers against losses incurred in their role as Director, Alternate Director, Secretary, Executive or other employee of Infigen or its subsidiaries, subject to certain exclusions, including to the extent that such indemnity is prohibited by the Corporations Act 2001 or any other applicable law. Infigen will meet the full amount of any such liabilities, costs and expenses (including legal fees). Infigen has not been advised of any claims under any of the above indemnities. During the financial year Infigen paid insurance premiums for a Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance contract which provides cover for the current and former Directors, Alternate Directors, Secretaries and Executive Officers of Infigen and its subsidiaries. The Directors have not included details of the nature of the liabilities covered in this contract or the amount of the premium paid, as disclosure is prohibited under the terms of the contract. proceedings on Behalf of infigen No person has applied for leave of the Court to bring proceedings on behalf of Infigen, or to intervene in any proceedings to which Infigen is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of Infigen for all or part of those proceedings. Infigen was not a party to any such proceedings during the year. Former partners of the Audit Firm No current Directors or Officers of Infigen have been Partners of PricewaterhouseCoopers at a time when that firm has been the auditor of Infigen. non-Audit services Based on written advice of the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee, the Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services, during the year, by the auditor (or by another person or firm on the auditor’s behalf) is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. Details of amounts paid or payable to the auditor for non-audit services provided during the year by the auditor are outlined in Note 8 to the Financial Statements. Auditor’s independence Declaration Infigen’s auditor has provided a written declaration under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 that to the best of its knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of: ƒ the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and ƒ the applicable Australian code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. The auditor’s independence declaration is attached to this Directors’ Report. rounding Pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/0100, dated 10 July 1998, amounts in the Directors’ Report and the Financial Report are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars, unless otherwise indicated. DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 55 Directors’ report continueD remuneration report Dear Securityholder, We are pleased to present the 2014 Remuneration Report. Market conditions in Australia remain subdued due to the regulatory uncertainty caused by the RET review. In the USA we are beginning to see signs of improved market conditions. These factors have influenced our objective to maintain a capable, agile and motivated team in both regions. We have continued to exercise moderation in remuneration changes, while retaining relatively high levels of potential Long Term Incentive (LTI) opportunities for key executives. These continue to reflect the current challenging and transitional nature of our business, and will be reviewed once those conditions are overcome. In looking ahead to FY15 the Board has decided that KMP remuneration will remain unchanged. Following a review of Director Remuneration a decision was made once again to keep director fees unchanged but to adjust the committee fees reflecting an increase in the continued compliance obligations of both sub committees and market rates. The FY12 Deferred Short Term Incentive (STI) payments vested in September 2013. This was the first year where STI payments were partially deferred, with the deferred element settled in securities rather than cash. In accordance with the Securities Trading Policy, Infigen issued 2,727,462 securities once a trading window was open following release of the FY13 annual results to meet the Deferred STI obligation. As foreshadowed last year, the STI framework for FY14 was further refined. Financial goals now determine 80% of the Key Management Personnel (KMP) STI opportunity. The balance relates to specific short-term measures required of management. The Board retains discretion to vary STI payments based on material departures in personal or corporate achievements. We have included the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used in determining the FY14 STI payment for the KMP. Clawback mechanisms are now embedded within both the LTI and deferred STI plans whereby unvested Performance Rights can be forfeited in the event of materially adverse financial misstatements. During the year we restructured the organisation by reducing the number of executives for the purpose of strict control on cost whilst simultaneously acquiring technical skills and resources needed to improve operational performance. A decision was made to make the position of Executive General Manager Australian Operations redundant which resulted in Mr Scott Taylor’s employment ending on 31 December 2013. On behalf of the Company I thank Scott for his dedication, commitment and contribution to Infigen. Yours faithfully Mike Hutchinson Chairman Nomination & Remuneration Committee 56 | InfIgEn EnERgY AnnuAl REPORT 2014 1. remuneration report – executive summary The Nomination & Remuneration Committee has: ƒ reviewed executive and senior management salaries; ƒ monitored performance and the alignment of KPIs to short term business objectives and priorities; ƒ reviewed director remuneration and implemented minor changes to Committee member fees; ƒ established a guideline for minimum securityholdings for non-executive directors; ƒ determined KPIs for FY15; and ƒ reviewed the leadership structure and succession plans. Significant matters to note for director, executive and senior management FY14 remuneration are: ƒ remuneration of KMP was increased during the year by an average 3.7%; ƒ 2,727,462 Securities were issued to satisfy the FY12 deferred STI obligation that vested in August 2013; ƒ no LTIs vested during the year, however Tranche 2 of the FY12 LTI grant has met the performance condition for vesting to occur when the first trading window opens following the release of the FY14 financial results; ƒ At least 50% of the KMP FY13 STI was deferred for 12 months and will vest in the first trading window that opens following the release of the FY14 financial results; and ƒ At least 50% of the KMP FY14 STI will be deferred for 12 months. 2. remuneration Framework Infigen’s remuneration framework aims to ensure remuneration: ƒ is commensurate with contributions, positions and responsibilities; ƒ is fair and reasonable relative to market benchmarks; ƒ is linked with Infigen’s strategic goals and business performance; ƒ rewards the delivery of consistently high performance; ƒ aligns performance with the organisational values and leadership behaviour; ƒ attracts and retains high performing individuals; and ƒ is aligned with the interests of securityholders. 3. remuneration of senior Management The remuneration framework for KMP comprises three components: ƒ fixed pay; ƒ a short term incentive (STI), which is a variable payment linked to achieving specified performance measured over a 12 month period; and ƒ a long term incentive (LTI), which is a payment linked to meeting specified performance hurdles over a three or four year period. Remuneration is benchmarked on the advice of external advisers, Guerdon Associates, against industry peers within utilities, generation and infrastructure. 3.1 Fixed Pay Fixed pay is cash salary and superannuation. Infigen does not presently offer remuneration packaging other than superannuation salary sacrifice. Adjustments to fixed pay in FY14 reflected an average 3.7% market rate adjustment to KMP. The Managing Director’s fixed pay was increased by 3%. 3.2 Short Term Incentives STI is an at-risk performance-related component of remuneration. STIs are subject to the achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs). KPIs are set annually and reviewed during the year. KPIs are aligned with overall strategy, budget, and individual objectives and accountabilities. The long life, capital intensive nature of Infigen’s assets with their associated high financing costs and depreciation charges result in statutory accounting losses for a significant portion of the asset life. The depreciation element is non-cash and the assets continue to generate strong cash flows. Consequently the Board has determined that it is appropriate and desirable to motivate and reward the KMP to focus on delivering stable and predictable results by delivering annual improvements in operating efficiency (maximising production at lowest cost) to deliver cash flow outcomes. These objectives are complementary to the medium term goals of achieving a more sustainable capital structure and profitable business growth, leading to scope for a resumption of distributions. The Board determines the aggregate amount of STI payments, the KPIs for the CEO, the amount of the CEO’s STI payment, and reviews KPI achievement and STI payments for KMP. DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 57 DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED In setting the aggregate amount of the STI pool, the board introduced ‘gateway hurdles’ within the FY14 STI scheme to establish the benchmark for determining what events will automatically trigger Board consideration to rerate the STI Pool. The gateway hurdles are: 1) Non achievement of the Budgeted Debt Amortisation/Cash target; or 2) A material non-compliance of a major debt facility; or 3) A “Catastrophic”, “Major” or multiple “Moderate” incidents occurred as defined in the Risk Management Policy. Any consideration of the STI Pool would also have regard to the opportunities for management to influence a business outcome, and those matters (such as wind speeds and energy market pricing) that are not subject to short term management influence. Reflecting the commitment of the Board and Senior Management to maintain a disciplined approach to managing operating costs and generating cash flows to meet the mandatory debt repayments and to pay down debt, the KMP financial goal outcomes determined 80% of the FY14 STI opportunity. Strategic and operational goal outcomes determined 20%. We have set out in Table 1 a description of the FY14 KPIs used to determine the STI payments for KMP. Each KPI is weighted as a percentage of the total STI opportunity and includes an assessment criterion or hurdle. Each KPI contains quantitative measures including budget achievement and are scaled progressively around stretch targets. The hurdles are weighted so that better than budget performance results in self-funded STI payments. The FY14 personal business goals support the alignment of strategic objectives and short term metrics. Table 1: FY14 KPIs for STI Measure Goals Hurdle FINANCIAL BUSINESS GOALS (TARGET WEIGHTING OF 80% OF STI TARGET) Stable, predictable and profitable performance – Total Costs Achieve Budget Total Costs Stable, predictable and profitable performance – Debt Amortisation Guidance Achieve Budget Debt Amortisation Guidance Sliding scale of budget achievement where: ƒ Maximum 50% of the KPI weighting is paid for delivering on budget; ƒ 100% of the KPI weighting is paid for delivering a stretch target for under budget performance; Sliding scale of budget achievement where: ƒ Maximum 50% of the KPI weighting is paid for delivering on budget; ƒ 100% of the KPI weighting is paid for delivering a stretch target of budget over performance; PERSONAL BUSINESS GOALS (TARGET WEIGHTING OF 20% OF STI TARGET) Measure Goals Sustainable Capital Structure Develop and implement pro-active Board-approved measures that within FY14, demonstrate substantial and sustainable progress towards freeing Infigen’s commercial options. Achieve Profitable Growth Develop and implement Board-approved measures that within FY14, demonstrate progress towards business objectives that enhance Infigen’s operational capability and performance. 3.3 FY14 Short Term Incentive Performance To illustrate how individual STI payments are determined we have included in Table 2 the range of KMPs FY14 KPI assessments as a percentage of total opportunity. The resulting STI payments awarded to the KMP are illustrated in Table 3 Cash based remuneration received by executive KMP. Table 2: FY14 STI KPI opportunity and achievement Measure Total Costs Debt Amortisation Guidance Personal Business Goals Total Weighting as a % of Total Opportunity KMP Achievement as a % of Total Opportunity 30% 50% 20% 100% 30% 47.7% 10% – 17.5% 87.7% – 95.2% 58 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 3.4 Short Term Incentive Deferral STI payments include a 12 month partial deferral condition. At least 50% of individual STI amounts exceeding a threshold ($50,000) are deferred and paid in IFN securities. Payment of the deferred STI is subject to continued employment. The deferred payment may be forfeited if there is a materially adverse financial restatement. The deferral conditions for the FY13 deferred STI included a new clawback mechanism that complements the LTI clawback provision. The new provision enables forfeiture of some or all unvested STI and/or LTI Performance Rights if a previously vested LTI Grant was associated with a materially adverse financial misstatement. A total of $686,536 was deferred from the FY13 STI entitlements in the form of 2,713,582 Performance Rights at a security value of $0.253. A total of 2,226,475 securities are expected to be issued by the company in the relevant trading window following the release of the FY14 financial results with the balance being cash settled at the equivalent market value upon vesting. It is not intended to clawback any of these securities. Since recipients of these securities will incur an associated taxation liability, there will be some sales of securities to fund the tax liability. Any such sales are subject to the company’s Securities Trading Policy and insider trading laws. 3.5 Long Term Incentives KMP and senior managers in positions that directly affect the long term value of Infigen securities may be eligible for LTIs. LTIs are awarded as future rights to acquire IFN securities. The rights may vest after three or four years, subject to performance hurdles. The Managing Director’s grant is subject to securityholder approval. The number of rights granted is based on the LTI value, divided by the reference price for IFN securities. This is the volume weighted average ASX market closing price in the last five trading days of the prior financial year. LTI grants comprise two equal tranches, each subject to a different performance test. Vesting of each tranche is contingent on achieving the relevant performance hurdle. The two performance hurdles are (1) Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and (2) a financial performance test. The financial performance test is a test of the cumulative growth in the ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) to capital base. Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Performance Rights Relative TSR EBITDA Both hurdles are measured over a three year period. The three year performance period of the FY14 Grant is 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2016. In the event that no Performance Rights vest after the initial three year performance period then the LTI grant will be subject to a single re-test on 30 June 2017, after which all unvested rights will lapse. The FY11 LTI Grant entered a final retest period in FY14. As at 30 June 2014 this grant failed both performance conditions. As this grant was in its final retest period, this grant will now expire on the second day of the first trading window to open after 1 July 2014. The FY12 LTI Grant completed the initial three year performance period on 30 June 2014. The Tranche 1 TSR performance condition was not achieved at 30 June 2014 and will now enter a final retest period for the Tranche 1 Performance Rights attached to this grant. The Tranche 2 operational performance condition of the FY12 LTI Grant passed the performance test on 30 June 2014 resulting in 51.2% of Tranche 2 Performance Rights vesting when the first trading window opens after 1 July 2014. A total of 667,673 securities are expected to be issued by the company in the relevant trading window. The remaining unvested FY12 Tranche 2 Performance Rights will expire on the second day of the first trading window to open after 1 July 2014. TSR performance condition: TSR measures the growth in the price of securities plus cash distributions notionally reinvested in securities. In order for any portion of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights to vest, the TSR of IFN must outperform that of the median company in the S&P/ASX 200 (excluding financial services and the materials/resources sector). Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest progressively as follows: Infigen Energy’s TSR performance compared to the relevant peer group FY12, 13 & 14 Grant Percentage of Tranche 1 Performance Rights that vest 0 to 49th percentile 50th percentile 51st to 75th percentile 76th to 95th percentile Nil 25% of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest 27%–75% (i.e. for every percentile increase between 51% and 75% an additional 2% of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest) 76.25%–100% (i.e. for every percentile increase between 76% and 95% an additional 1.25% of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest) DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 59 DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED EBITDA performance condition: the annual target will be a specified percentage increase in the ratio of EBITDA to capital base over the year. The capital base will be measured as equity (net assets) plus net debt. Both the EBITDA and capital case will be measured on a proportionately consolidated basis to reflect Infigen’s economic interest in all investments. The annual target for FY14 has been set to reflect the performance expectations of Infigen’s business and prevailing market conditions. The annual target for each subsequent financial year will be established by the Board based on stretch budgets no later than the time of the release of Infigen’s annual financial results for the preceding financial year. The prospective targets are set with reference to Infigen’s annual budgets. They remain confidential to Infigen. However each year’s target and the performance against that target are disclosed retrospectively. The EBITDA performance condition rewards management for sustaining and delivering capital efficiency performance over an extended period. Relevant metrics for the last three financial year periods are provided in the table below. Closing security price EBITDA Capital Base EBITDA to capital base Target 30 June 2012 30 June 2013 30 June 2014 (cents) (AUD’000) (AUD’000) (%) (%) 0.225 140,500 1,656,177 8.48 9.26 0.251 160,445 1,591,793 10.08 9.40 0.242 176,682 1,733,099 10.19 10.03 Tranche 2 of the FY13 and FY14 LTI Grants are currently on target to vest, but will not be tested until the end of the relevant three year performance period. Tranche 2 Performance Rights in FY12, 13 and 14 vest progressively as shown in the table below: Infigen’s EBITDA performance FY12, 13 & 14 Grant Percentage of Tranche 2 Performance Rights that vest 0% < 90% Nil 90% ≤ 110% of the cumulative target 5% to 100% (i.e. for every 1% increase between 90% and 110% of target an additional 5% of the Tranche 2 Performance Rights will vest). Equity Plan rules: Performance rights and options are governed by the rules of the Equity Plan that were approved by securityholders in 2009 and 2011. They provide that the Board may exercise discretion to accelerate the vesting of any performance rights or options awarded in the FY14 Grant in the event of a change in control of Infigen. In exercising its discretion the Board will have regard to the performance and the nature of the relevant transaction. It is currently unlikely that the Board would accelerate vesting of any performance rights that were otherwise unlikely to vest in the ordinary course of business. Plan participants are prohibited from hedging their exposure to Infigen’s security price associated with the plan. As the Equity Plan was approved by securityholders in 2011, Listing Rule 7.2 exemption 9 provides that an issue of securities under an employee incentive scheme does not detract from the available 15% limit under Listing Rule 7.1. Thus the securities issued under the Equity Plan will not be taken into account when undertaking a calculation of the 15% limit pursuant to Listing Rule 7.1. 3.6 Separation Benefits The Board will continue to limit any future separation benefits to a maximum of 12 months fixed remuneration in all foreseeable circumstances. 60 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 4. Infigen Energy – KMP Remuneration Details In addition to the non-executive directors, the following persons were the KMP of the Infigen Energy group during the financial year: M George C Baveystock B Hopwood S Taylor S Wright C Carson Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Executive General Manager Corporate Finance Executive General Manager Operations – Australia (No longer a KMP from 31/12/13) General Counsel Executive General Manager Operations and CEO USA 4.1 Cash Based Remuneration Received by Executive KMP The following table summarises the cash based and at-risk remuneration KMP received in FY14. The only cash remuneration received in FY14 was in the form of salary, superannuation, non-deferred STI and retention payments. Table 3: Cash based remuneration received by executive KMP Executive Year Salary Cash based remuneration At-risk remuneration Maximum STI oppor- tunity 1 STI awarded for the period Retention Super- annuation Equity vested during the year Total actual remune- ration received LTI granted in the year 2 Equity deferred STI3, 4 M George C Baveystock B Hopwood S Wright C Carson 5 ($) ($) ($) 602,226 510,000 236,385 585,530 500,000 169,000 335,226 155,000 324,530 153,000 335,226 155,000 324,530 184,000 335,226 150,000 324,530 150,000 73,780 59,058 69,905 65,504 67,650 55,650 338,024 283,504 124,317 ($) – – – 81,133 – – – – – 279,242 279,242 109,882 122,047 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) 17,774 16,470 17,774 16,470 17,774 16,470 17,774 16,470 7,322 8,524 323,996 1,180,381 386,236 236,385 – 771,000 354,854 169,000 86,630 – 513,410 481,191 114,249 103,612 79,335 502,240 114,249 – 406,504 73,774 494,424 – 396,650 82,619 70,761 48,081 73,780 59,058 69,905 65,504 67,650 55,650 127,638 597,300 80,715 124,317 – 519,695 – 109,882 FY14 1,945,928 1,253,504 572,037 – 78,418 691,373 3,287,755 766,210 572,037 FY13 1,838,362 1,266,242 459,094 203,179 74,404 – 2,575,039 589,165 459,094 1 The maximum STI Opportunity represents the total opportunity available to the KMP should they achieve 100% of the KPI objectives. The minimum STI opportunity is zero. 2 This represents the market value of the LTI awarded in the form of a grant of performance rights under the Infigen Energy Equity Plan prior to amortisation. 3 The deferred STI Payment is awarded in the form of a grant of performance rights under the Infigen Energy Equity Plan. The number of performance rights granted is determined by dividing the deferred amount by the value of a performance right using the VWAP of Infigen Energy stapled securities in the five trading days up to 30 June. 4 The VWAP per security of the FY13 grant was $0.2203 and $0.253 for the FY14 grant. 5 The remuneration amounts reflect a conversion of $US into $AUD using an average rate of AU$1.0242 in FY13 and AU$0.91704 in FY14. DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 61 DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED 4.2 Statutory Remuneration Data for the Year Ended 30 June 2014 The Statutory Remuneration Data table below shows the accounting expensed amounts that reflect a portion of possible future remuneration arising from prior and current year LTI grants. Table 4: Statutory remuneration data for executive KMP Short-term employee benefits Post employment benefits Other long-term employee benefits Share-based payments Executive Year Salary STI paid in current period Retention payment Termi- nation payments Non- monetary benefits1 Total of short- term employee benefits Super- annuation LSL accrual Equity settled2 Cash settled Total ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) M George FY14 602,226 236,385 FY13 585,530 169,000 C Baveystock B Hopwood S Wright C Carson 3 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 335,226 324,530 73,780 59,058 335,226 69,905 324,530 65,504 335,226 67,650 324,530 55,650 338,024 124,317 – – – 81,133 – – – – – 279,242 109,882 122,047 Total remuneration FY14 1,945,928 572,037 – FY13 1,838,362 459,094 203,179 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 838,611 754,530 409,006 464,721 405,131 390,034 402,876 380,180 16,012 478,352 15,085 526,255 17,774 16,470 17,774 16,470 17,774 16,470 17,774 16,470 7,322 8,524 16,807 502,639 16,027 267,662 2,905 156,160 2,115 110,815 10,333 153,464 11,469 82,561 6,040 2,532 101,471 62,452 – 1,375,831 – 1,335,569 – – – – – – 585,845 594,121 586,702 541,506 528,161 461,634 – – – – 149,286 634,961 57,889 597,893 16,012 2,533,976 78,418 36,085 913,734 149,286 3,711,500 15,085 2,515,720 74,404 32,143 523,490 57,889 3,530,723 G Dutaillis4 FY14 1,463 – FY13 380,530 205,056 S Taylor5 FY14 174,112 75,175 FY13 340,530 98,437 – – – – 346,959 – 287,123 – – – – – 348,422 135 585,586 16,470 536,410 8,887 – – – 438,967 16,470 2,936 – 179,887 528,445 313,693 99,139 18,452 – – – – 545,297 476,825 Total remuneration FY14 2,121,503 647,212 FY13 2,559,422 762,587 203,180 – 634,082 16,012 3,418,809 87,441 36,085 1,012,873 329,173 4,785,242 – 15,085 3,540,273 107,344 35,079 228,249 57,889 4,295,911 Includes the Deferred STI granted in the period. 1 USA Health Benefits (Medical, Dental, Vision) have not been previously disclosed. Health Benefits are offered to all Infigen’s US employees. 2 3 The remuneration amounts reflect a conversion of $US into $AUD using an average rate of AU$1.0242 in FY13 and AU$0.91704 in FY14. 4 G Dutaillis’ termination payment includes severance and statutory annual and long service leave entitlements. Under the Equity Plan rules Mr Dutaillis was entitled to receive a cash settled payment upon vesting of the 2012 deferred STI. The security price on the vesting date of $0.29652 was used to determine the value of the cash payment. 5 S Taylor’s termination payment includes severance, payment in lieu of notice not served and statutory annual leave entitlements. The FY13 STI payment was paid in full without deferral. The FY14 STI was pro rata to termination date and subject to achievement of business financial goals. 62 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 4.3 Remuneration Components as a Proportion of Total Remuneration The proportions of fixed remuneration to at-risk performance-based remuneration are decided on a case-by-case basis for each executive. The proportions for FY14 fixed remuneration and the maximum at-risk opportunity are set out below. Table 5: Remuneration components for executive KMP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% M George C Baveystock B Hopwood S Wright C Carson ■ Fixed Rem ■ STI Opportunity ■ LTI Opportunity DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 63 DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED 4.4 Value of Remuneration That May Vest in Future Years Remuneration amounts provided in the table below refer to the maximum value of performance rights relating to IFN securities. These amounts have been determined at grant date by using a pricing model and amortised in accordance with AASB 2 ‘Share Based Payments’. The minimum value of remuneration that may vest is nil. The current market value is included to provide additional information to illustrate the difference in value of these LTI grants when comparing the accounting value and the current market value. The accounting value relies upon the value of the security at the time the grant was made. The accounting standards are used for the purpose of providing for the LTI expense within the financial statements. Table 6: Remuneration that may vest in future years Executive Grant Maximum value of remuneration which is subject to vesting in accordance with AASB 2 ‘Share Based Payments’ Current market value of remuneration which is subject to vesting (VWAP 5 trading days prior to 30 June 2014) FY12 ($) FY13 ($) FY14 ($) FY15 ($) FY16 ($) FY12 ($) FY13 ($) FY14 ($) FY15 ($) FY16 ($) 32,898 74,038 51,698 – 43,091 96,978 67,716 – 130,818 112,018 112,018 198,611 170,068 170,068 – – 141,659 122,083 122,494 – 137,167 46,528 – – 172,056 148,280 148,778 – 112,976 38,322 Total 32,898 204,856 305,375 371,268 169,022 43,091 295,588 409,841 431,324 187,100 M George FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14 1 C Baveystock B Hopwood S Taylor C Carson S Wright FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14 1 Total FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14 1 Total FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14 1 Total FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14 1 Total FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14 1 Total – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 11,116 – – – 25,016 38,197 – – 17,468 32,708 41,903 – – 32,708 36,112 47,934 – – 36,234 16,260 14,560 – – – 32,767 57,991 – – 22,880 49,657 50,895 – – 49,657 43,861 39,480 – – 44,009 13,392 11,116 63,213 92,079 116,754 52,494 14,560 90,759 123,433 132,998 57,401 11,116 – – – 25,016 30,458 17,468 – 26,080 26,080 – – – – 41,903 – 36,112 53,166 36,234 18,034 14,560 – – – 32,767 46,241 – – 22,880 39,596 50,895 – – 39,596 43,861 43,789 – – 44,009 14,854 11,116 55,474 85,451 115,358 54,268 14,560 79,009 113,371 127,246 58,863 11,116 – – – 25,016 38,197 17,468 32,708 – 32,708 – – – – – – 11,116 63,213 50,176 32,708 14,560 – – – 32,767 57,991 22,880 49,657 – 49,657 – – – – – – 14,560 90,759 72,538 49,657 – – – – – – 17,725 – – – – – – 29,604 25,513 – 100,025 25,599 33,929 29,604 125,538 59,528 – 15,178 25,953 – – 15,178 22,366 45,168 – – 22,442 15,321 – – – – – – 29,822 – – – – – – 35,956 – 30,987 82,384 31,092 27,945 35,956 113,371 59,037 – 25,536 31,522 – – 25,536 27,166 37,202 – – 27,257 12,619 17,725 41,131 82,712 37,763 29,822 57,058 89,904 39,876 – – – – – – – – – 1 FY13 Deferred STI If the difference between the accounting standard value and the current market value remains low we will discontinue the current market value comparison in future years. 64 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 4.5 Unvested Performance Rights The table below provides details of outstanding performance rights relating to IFN securities that have been granted to KMP (FY12, FY13 and FY14 Grants). The performance rights are valued as at the grant date even though the grant was based on the VWAP of the five trading days up to 30 June in the year prior to the grant. Table 7: Unvested performance rights Executive Grant Granted number Grant date Value per performance right at grant date Value of performance rights granted at grant date Potential Vesting Dates ($) ($) LTI Tranche 1 LTI Tranche 2 Deferred STI M George G Dutaillis 3 C Baveystock B Hopwood S Taylor 3 C Carson 4 S Wright FY12 1 FY13 FY14 FY14 2 FY12 1 FY13 FY12 1 FY13 FY14 FY14 2 FY12 1 FY13 FY14 FY14 2 FY12 1 FY13 FY14 FY14 2 FY13 FY14 FY14 2 917,374 18-Jan-12 2,378,575 26-Oct-12 2,071,146 02-Dec-13 667,984 02-Dec-13 463,384 966,862 309,966 694,508 612,648 233,431 309,966 553,790 612,648 258,909 309,966 694,508 18-Jan-12 26-Oct-12 18-Jan-12 26-Oct-12 02-Dec-13 02-Dec-13 18-Jan-12 26-Oct-12 02-Dec-13 02-Dec-13 18-Jan-12 26-Oct-13 432,826 02-Dec-13 487,107 02-Dec-13 322,288 26-Oct-12 379,447 219,960 02-Dec-13 02-Dec-13 0.1729 0.1492 0.1865 0.275 0.1729 0.1492 0.1729 0.1492 0.1865 0.275 0.1729 0.1492 0.1865 0.275 0.1729 0.1492 0.1865 0.275 0.1429 0.1865 0.275 158,634 354,854 386,236 183,696 30-Jun-15 01-Sep-14 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-16 80,129 30-Jun-15 01-Sep-14 144,244 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-15 53,600 103,612 114,249 64,194 53,600 82,619 30-Jun-15 01-Sep-14 30-Jun-14 30-Jun-14 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-15 01-Sep-14 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-15 114,249 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-16 71,200 53,600 103,612 30-Jun-15 01-Sep-14 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-15 80,715 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-16 133,954 48,081 70,761 60,489 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-15 30-Jun-16 30-Jun-16 01-Sep-14 01-Sep-14 01-Sep-14 01-Sep-14 01-Sep-14 1 Tranche 1 of this grant has now entered the final retest period. Tranche 2 of this grant will vest when the first trading window opens following the release of FY14 results. 2 Relates to the STI Deferred from FY13. 3 The FY12 and FY13 grants remain in the plan for the duration of the performance period in accordance with the Equity Plan rules. 4 C Carson participates in a shadow equity plan which is cash settled because he is a US resident. DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 65 DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED 5. KMP Employment Contracts The base salaries for KMP as at 30 June 2014 are as follows: M George B Hopwood C Baveystock S Wright C Carson $602,226 $335,226 $335,226 $335,226 $310,000 USD Employment contracts relating to the KMP contain the following conditions: Duration of contract Open-ended Notice period to terminate the contract Termination payments provided under the contract The employment of M George is able to be terminated by either party on 6 months’ written notice. For B Hopwood, C Baveystock, C Carson and S Wright their employment is able to be terminated by either party on 3 months’ written notice. Infigen may elect to pay an amount in lieu of completing the notice period, calculated on the base salary as at the termination date. Upon termination, any accrued but untaken annual and long-service (but not sickness or personal) leave entitlements, in accordance with applicable legislation, are payable. Upon the event of redundancy a severance payment is made equivalent to 4 weeks base salary for each year of service (or part thereof), up to a maximum of 36 weeks. 6. Remuneration of Non-Executive Directors Non-Executive Director fees are determined by the Infigen Boards within the aggregate amount approved by securityholders. The approved aggregate fee pool for IEL and IEBL is $1,000,000. The fee paid to Directors varies with individual board and committee responsibilities. Non-Executive Director fees were reviewed in FY14. Director fees were not adjusted during the year and no change is proposed for FY15. The Committee member fees were adjusted effective from 1 January 2014. Non-Executive Directors receive a cash fee for service inclusive of statutory superannuation. Non-Executive Directors do not receive any performance-based remuneration or retirement benefits other than statutory superannuation contributions. 6.1 Board/Committee Fees Aggregate annual fees payable to Non-Executive Directors during the year ended 30 June 2014 are set out below. Board/Committee Infigen Boards Infigen Audit, Risk & Compliance Committees IEL Nomination & Remuneration Committee Role Chairman Non-Executive Director Chairman Member Chairman 1 Member Fee (pa) $250,000 $125,000 $21,000 $10,500 $12,000 $7,500 1 The present Committee Chairman is also the Chairman of the Board and does not receive this fee. 66 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 6.2 Remuneration of Non-Executive Directors for the Year Ended 30 June 2014 The nature and amount of each element of fee payments to each Non-Executive Director of Infigen for the years ended 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2014 are set out in the table below. Non-Executive Directors M Hutchinson P Green 1 F Harris R Rolfe AO Total Remuneration Fees Super- annuation IERL ($) IEL & IEBL ($) IEL & IEBL ($) 102,179 95,506 – – 55,928 55,046 52,678 52,293 130,046 138,024 – – 82,516 81,651 76,842 76,147 210,785 202,846 289,404 295,821 17,775 16,470 – – 12,806 12,303 11,980 11,560 42,561 40,333 Total ($) 250,000 250,000 – – 151,250 149,000 141,500 140,000 542,750 539,000 Year FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 FY14 FY13 1 P Green was appointed as a Non-Executive Director of Infigen Energy Limited (IEL), Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (IEBL) and Infigen Energy RE Limited (IERL) on 18 November 2010. Mr Green is a partner of The Children’s Investment Fund Management LLP which is a substantial securityholder of the Infigen group. Throughout FY14 Mr Green elected to receive no Director fees. 7. Guideline for Minimum Securityholdings for Non-Executive Directors In February 2014 the Board established a guideline where Non-Executive Directors who receive payment of Director fees from Infigen are encouraged to acquire IFN securities equivalent to the after-tax value of one year’s Director base fee. The acquisition of the relevant amount of IFN securities shall be completed within 3 years from the adoption of the guideline for existing Non-Executive Directors, or 3 years following appointment for subsequently elected Non-Executive Directors. The acquisition of IFN securities under this guideline is subject to Infigen’s Securities Trading Policy and sufficient trading windows being open during the relevant period. No trading windows have been open to Non-Executive Directors since this guideline was established. 8. Remuneration Adviser The Nomination & Remuneration Committee engaged the services of Guerdon Associates throughout FY14 to advise on minor miscellaneous matters. The consultant provided no other services to the Company during this period. No advice was provided that falls within the definition of a remuneration recommendation of the Corporations Act 2001, Chapter 1, Part 1.2, Division1, s.9B(1)(a) and (b). To ensure the Nomination & Remuneration Committee is provided with advice and, as required, remuneration recommendations, free from undue influence by members of the Executive KMP to whom the recommendations may relate, the engagement of Guerdon Associates is based on an agreed set of protocols to be followed by Guerdon Associates, members of the Committee and members of Executive KMP. The Board was satisfied that the advice received was free from the undue influence of the Executive Key Management Personnel to whom the advice related because: ƒ Guerdon Associates was appointed by independent directors; ƒ Guerdon Associates did not provide services to management; ƒ Reports with recommendations were only received by Non-Executive Directors; and ƒ The agreed protocols were followed. Pursuant to section 298(2) of the Corporations Act 2001, this report is made in accordance with resolutions of the Directors of Infigen Energy Limited and the Directors of Infigen Energy RE Limited, the responsible entity of the Infigen Energy Trust. On behalf of the Directors of Infigen Energy Limited and Infigen Energy RE Limited: M HUTCHINSON CHAIRMAN Sydney, 25 August 2014 M GEORGE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DIRECTORS’ REPORT | 67 Auditor’s Independence Declaration Auditor’s Independence Declaration As lead auditor for the audit of Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group for year ended 30 June 2014, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been: As lead auditor for the audit of Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group for year ended 30 June 2014, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been: a) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit and no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit and no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. a) b) b) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. This declaration is in respect of Infigen Energy Group and the entities it controlled during the period and Infigen Energy Trust Group and the entities it controlled during the period. This declaration is in respect of Infigen Energy Group and the entities it controlled during the period and Infigen Energy Trust Group and the entities it controlled during the period. Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers 25 August 2014 25 August 2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757 Darling Park Tower 2, 201 Sussex Street, GPO BOX 2650, SYDNEY NSW 1171 PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757 T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au Darling Park Tower 2, 201 Sussex Street, GPO BOX 2650, SYDNEY NSW 1171 T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. 68 | infigen eneRgY AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated statements of comprehensive income Consolidated statements of financial position Consolidated statements of changes in equity Consolidated cash flow statements 1. Summary of accounting policies 2. Segment information 3. Revenue 4. Other income 5. Expenses 6. Income taxes and deferred taxes 7. Key management personnel remuneration 8. Remuneration of auditors 9. Trade and other receivables 10. Inventory 11. Derivative financial instruments & Investment in Financial Assets 12. Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures 13. Fair value measurement of financial instruments & Investments in financial assets 14. Property, plant and equipment 15. Intangible assets 16. Trade and other payables 17. Borrowings 18. Provisions 19. Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities 20. Contributed equity 21. Reserves 22. Retained earnings 23. Earnings per share/unit 24. Distributions paid 25. Share-based payments 26. Commitments for expenditure 27. Contingent liabilities 28. Leases 29. Subsidiaries 30. Deed of cross guarantee 31. Acquisition of businesses 32. Related party disclosures 33. Subsequent events 34. Notes to the cash flow statements 35. Financial risk management 36. Parent entity financial information Directors’ declaration 70 71 72 74 75 88 90 90 91 92 95 97 97 98 98 99 100 103 104 106 107 110 110 112 112 113 114 115 115 117 118 118 119 122 123 124 124 124 125 136 137 finAnCiAl StAteMentS | 69 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP Revenue from continuing operations Income from institutional equity partnerships Other income Operating expenses Corporate costs Other expenses Depreciation and amortisation expense Impairment expense Interest expense Finance costs relating to institutional equity partnerships Other finance costs Share of net profits/(losses) of associates and joint ventures using the equity method Net loss before income tax benefit Income tax benefit Net loss for the year Other comprehensive income /(loss) Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss Note 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 6 2014 $’000 273,282 60,144 13,044 (102,302) (13,582) (6,259) 2013 $’000 (Restated) 259,672 51,958 5,070 (96,415) (14,124) (3,276) (123,886) (114,140) – (70,667) (28,939) (26,163) (39,386) (71,593) (43,806) (15,414) 13,705 (2,999) (11,623) 2,720 (84,453) 4,478 (8,903) (79,975) Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax 21(a) 21(b) Other comprehensive income /(loss) for the year, net of tax (6,257) 22,355 16,098 10,862 26,408 37,270 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) – – 9 – (19) (636) – – – – – – (646) – (646) – – – – – 14 – (40) (620) – – – – – – (646) – (646) – – – Total comprehensive income /(loss) for the year, net of tax 7,195 (42,705) (646) (646) Net gain/(loss) for the year is attributable to stapled securityholders as: Equity holders of the parent Equity holders of the other stapled entities (non-controlling interests) Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year is attributable to stapled securityholders as: Equity holders of the parent Equity holders of the other stapled entities (non-controlling interests) Earnings per security of the parent based on earnings from continuing operations attributable to the equity holders of the parent/based on earnings attributable to unitholders: Basic (cents per security/unit) Diluted (cents per security/unit) (8,177) (79,320) – (726) (655) (8,903) (79,975) (646) (646) – (646) (646) 7,921 (42,050) – – (726) 7,195 (655) (42,705) (646) (646) (646) (646) 23 23 (1.1) (1.1) (10.4) (10.4) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) The above statements of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 70 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2014 Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventory Derivative financial instruments Total current assets Non–current assets Receivables Investment in financial assets Derivative financial instruments Investment in associates and joint ventures Property, plant and equipment Deferred tax assets Intangible assets Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Derivative financial instruments Current tax liabilities Provisions Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Borrowings Derivative financial instruments Provisions Total non-current liabilities Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity holders of the parent Contributed equity Reserves Retained earnings Equity holders of the other stapled entities (non-controlling interests) Contributed equity Retained earnings Note 34(a) 9 10 11 9 11 11 12 14 6 15 16 17 11 6 18 17 11 18 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 80,699 37,689 16,164 994 2013 $’000 (Restated) 1 July 2012 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 121,213 38,378 12,618 2,585 122,680 33,524 15,736 3,242 392 383 – – – – – – 135,546 174,794 175,182 392 383 8,590 742,619 741,820 4,925 86,384 303 96,292 5,513 – 438 – 579 97,968 103,664 1,895,409 2,011,103 1,996,974 50,453 257,124 46,503 275,618 48,359 304,076 – – – – – – – – – – – – 2,390,890 2,437,143 2,462,242 742,619 741,820 2,526,436 2,611,937 2,637,424 743,011 742,203 32,419 63,984 33,964 – 2,900 33,830 31,164 52,187 – 2,795 35,906 56,000 42,578 3,660 3,449 3,511 2,875 – – – – – – – – 133,267 119,976 141,593 3,511 2,875 1,011,061 1,027,415 1,011,888 98,343 19,082 102,520 18,969 148,575 6,778 1,128,486 1,148,904 1,167,241 – – – – – – – – – – 19 772,625 859,042 802,757 2,034,378 2,127,922 2,111,591 3,511 2,875 492,058 484,015 525,833 739,500 739,328 2,305 (192,221) (55,672) 2,305 2,305 753,894 753,076 (208,349) (246,506) – – (47,495) 31,825 (14,394) (13,748) (245,588) (253,539) (212,376) 739,500 739,328 760,155 (22,509) 759,337 (21,783) 759,337 (21,128) 737,646 737,554 738,209 – – – – – – 20 21 22 20 22 Total equity 492,058 484,015 525,833 739,500 739,328 The above statements of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 71 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Attributable to equity holders of the parent Contributed equity $’000 Note Reserves $’000 Retained earnings $’000 Total equity of the parent $’000 Non- controlling interests $’000 Total equity $’000 Total equity at 1 July 2012 Net loss for the year Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations and movement in fair value Total comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: Recognition of share-based payments 21(b) 21(a) 21(d) 2,305 – (246,506) – 31,825 (79,320) (212,376) (79,320) 738,209 (655) 525,833 (79,975) – – – – 26,408 10,862 – – 26,408 10,862 – – 26,408 10,862 37,270 (79,320) (42,050) (655) (42,705) 887 – 887 – 887 Total equity at 30 June 2013 2,305 (208,349) (47,495) (253,539) 737,554 484,015 Net loss for the year Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations and movement in fair value Total comprehensive income/ (loss) for the year Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: Recognition of share-based payments 21(b) 21(a) 21(d) – – – – – – (8,177) (8,177) (726) (8,903) 22,355 (6,257) – – 22,355 (6,257) – – 22,355 (6,257) 16,098 (8,177) 7,921 (726) 7,195 30 – 30 818 848 Total equity at 30 June 2014 2,305 (192,221) (55,672) (245,588) 737,646 492,058 The above statements of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 72 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Total equity at 1 July 2012 Net loss for the year Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations and movement in fair value Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: Recognition of share-based payments Total equity at 30 June 2013 Net loss for the year Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations and movement in fair value Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: Recognition of share-based payments Total equity at 30 June 2014 INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP Contributed equity $’000 Retained earnings $’000 Total equity $’000 Note 753,076 – (13,102) (646) 739,974 (646) 21(b) 21(a) 21(d) 21(b) 21(a) – – – – – – – – (646) (646) – – 753,076 (13,748) 739,328 – – – – (646) (646) – – – – (646) (646) 21(d) 818 – 818 753,894 (14,394) 739,500 The above statements of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 73 CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 Cash flows from operating activities Loss for the year Adjustments for: INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) Note (8,903) (79,975) (646) (646) Net income from institutional equity partnerships (31,205) (8,152) (Gain)/loss on revaluation for fair value through profit or loss financial assets – financial instruments Cash distributions received from financial assets Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets Impairment expense Unrealised foreign exchange loss/(gain) Gain on sale of development assets Amortisation of share based payments expense 25 Amortisation of borrowing costs capitalised Share of losses/(profits) from associates and joint ventures Cash distributions received from associates and joint ventures Accretion of decommissioning & restoration provisions (Decrease) in current tax liability (Increase) in deferred tax balances Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects on disposal of controlled entity: (Increase)/decrease in assets: (2,451) 16,442 123,886 – (2,192) (4,396) 242 3,449 (13,705) 13,649 242 – (3,551) (1,832) – 114,140 39,386 5,049 – 828 1,492 2,999 13,883 1,816 (1,920) (3,902) Current receivables and other current assets (3,171) (179) Increase/(decrease) in liabilities: Current payables Non-current payables Net cash inflow from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Payments for property, plant and equipment Proceeds from sale of development assets Payments for intangible assets Payments for investments in associates and joint ventures Payment for investment in financial assets (US Class A) 7,031 113 5,305 95 95,480 89,033 (10,980) 8,270 (2,852) – (100,001) (8,033) – (10,070) (281) – Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities (105,563) (18,384) Cash flows from financing activities Proceeds from issue of equity securities Proceeds from borrowings Proceeds from borrowings – capitalised cost Repayment of borrowings Repayment from/(loans) to related parties 17(a) 17(a) – 113,908 (5,675) (92,963) – – – – (59,069) – Distributions paid to institutional equity partners 19 (44,008) (16,650) Net cash outflow from financing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year Effects of exchange rate changes on the balance of cash held in foreign currencies (28,738) (38,821) 121,213 (75,719) (5,070) 122,665 (1,693) 3,618 Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year 34(a) 80,699 121,213 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 636 – (10) – – – – – 818 – – – (799) – 19 9 383 – 392 The above cash flow statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 74 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 620 – (26) – – – – – – – – – 40 – 40 14 369 – 383 Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts for the year eNded 30 JuNe 2014 1. summary of accounting policies The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the consolidated financial report are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. The financial report consists of separate consolidated financial statements for: ƒ Infigen Energy Group (‘the Group’), being Infigen Energy Limited (‘IEL’), Infigen Energy Trust (‘IET’), Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (‘IEBL’) and the controlled entities of IEL and IET. ƒ Infigen Energy Trust Group (‘the Trust’), being Infigen Energy Trust (‘IET’) and its controlled entities. (i) Stapled security The shares of Infigen Energy Limited (‘IEL’) and Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (‘IEBL’) and the units of Infigen Energy Trust (‘IET’) are combined and issued as stapled securities in Infigen Energy Group (‘Infigen’ or the ‘Group’). The shares of IEL and IEBL and the units of IET cannot be traded separately and can only be traded as stapled securities. (ii) Trust information IET was established in Australia on 16 June 2003. On 26 September 2005, IET became a Registered Scheme and Infigen Energy RE Limited became the Responsible Entity of IET. The relationship of the Responsible Entity with the Scheme is governed by the terms and conditions specified in the Constitution. Summarised financial information relating to the parent entity of the Group, IEL, and also the parent entity of the Trust, IET, are presented in Note 36. (a) Basis of preparation As permitted by Class Order 05/642, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, these Financial Statements are combined financial statements that present the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of both the Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust. This general purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001. Infigen and IET are for-profit entities for the purpose of preparing the financial statements. (i) Compliance with IFRS The consolidated financial reports of the Group and the Trust, and parent entity information of IEL and IET comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (ii) Historical cost convention These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss, and as modified by reductions in carrying value of assets from impairment expenses. (iii) Legislative and regulatory regime These financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the legislative and regulatory regime that exists as at 30 June 2014 and at the date of this report. Changes to the regulatory regime, including any changes to the legislated Renewable Energy Target (RET), would be likely to impact the carrying values of assets, (including Property, Plant and Equipment, Deferred Tax Assets and Intangible Assets) and future renewable energy project development. (b) Consolidated accounts (i) Application of UIG 1013 Pre-date of Transition Stapling Arrangements and AASB Interpretation 1002 Post-date of Transition Stapling Arrangements For the purpose of UIG 1013 and AASB Interpretation 1002, IEL was identified as the parent entity of the Group in relation to the pre-date of transition stapling with IET and the post-date of transition stapling with IEBL. In accordance with UIG 1013, the results and equity of IEL and of IET have been combined in the financial statements of the group. However, since IEL had entered into both pre and post-date of transition stapling arrangements, the results and equity of IET and IEBL are both treated and disclosed as non-controlling interests in the financial statements of the Group under the principles established in AASB Interpretation 1002. (c) Principles of consolidation (i) Subsidiaries The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of the Group and the Trust as at 30 June 2014 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. Subsidiaries are all those entities (including certain institutional equity partnerships and other special purpose entities) over which the Group or the Trust has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group or the Trust controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group or the Trust. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group or the Trust. The Group applies a policy of treating transactions with non- controlling interests as transactions with a shareholder external to the Group. Purchases from non-controlling interests result in an acquisition reserve being the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of identifiable net assets of the subsidiary. Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group or Trust companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group or the Trust. Non-controlling interests in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the consolidated income statement and balance sheets respectively. (ii) Joint arrangements Under AASB 11 Joint arrangements, investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures. The classification depends on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor, rather than the legal structure of the joint arrangement. The Group has joint ventures which include certain institutional equity partnerships. Interests in joint ventures are accounted for in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method, after initially being recognised at cost in the consolidated balance sheet. Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts | 75 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) (iii) Associates Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control or joint control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Investments in associates are accounted for in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting, after initially being recognised at cost. The Group’s investment in associates includes goodwill (net of any accumulated impairment loss) identified on acquisition. (iv) Equity method The Group’s equity accounted investees’ net profits or losses after tax are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves are recognised in reserves in the consolidated statement of financial position. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. Dividends receivable from associates are recognised in the parent entity’s income statement, while in the consolidated financial statements they reduce the carrying amount of the investment. When the Group’s share of losses in an associate or joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other long-term receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint venture. Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates/joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the associates/joint ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. (d) Critical accounting estimates and judgments The Group or the Trust makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that may have a financial effect on the entity and that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. Some of the estimates and assumptions that may have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are: (i) Estimated impairment of goodwill and other assets The Group tests annually whether goodwill and other assets have suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policies stated in Note 1(p). The determination of the recoverable amounts of CGUs requires the use of assumptions about a range of factors. Refer to Note 15 for details of these assumptions and the potential effect of changes to the assumptions. (ii) Income and deferred taxes The Group is subject to income taxes in Australia and jurisdictions where it has foreign operations. The Group currently has significant tax losses in Australia and its foreign operations. The Group is required to make significant judgements and assessments in relation to the recoverability of future tax losses which have been recognised as deferred tax assets. This includes consideration of many future events and outcomes that are uncertain. Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable 76 | iNfigeN eNeRgY aNNual RepoRt 2014 that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses. Currently only Australian tax losses have been brought to account as deferred tax assets. Under the current legislation, IET is not subject to income tax as unit holders are presently entitled to the income of IET. (iii) Development Assets The Group holds renewable development assets in both the US and Australia (refer Note 15). The recoverable amount of the development assets is dependent upon internal valuations, which consider how advanced the development projects are, and the current, or expected future, market demand for these assets. The US market for solar development assets is currently active and liquid, with regulatory stability and external reference points available to support carrying values. The market for Australian renewable development assets, underpinned by the legislated Renewable Energy Target (RET), is currently less active and highly illiquid due to regulatory uncertainty. A Panel review of the RET was undertaken in 2014 and the Panel is due to report its recommendations to the Federal Government at the end of August 2014. The Government will then consider the recommendations and determine what, if any, legislative or regulatory changes it will pursue. The current assumptions and estimates that support the recoverable amount of the Group’s Australian development assets are necessarily based on the current legislated targets, however should the Government pursue and legislate changes to the targets that result in a material curtailment of renewable energy development requirements under the term of the RET (currently 2030), a review of current valuations would need to be undertaken. (iv) Institutional Equity Partnerships The Group has made estimates and assumptions in relation to future revenues and expenses in order to determine the quantum of Institutional Equity Partnerships classified as liabilities. These estimates are long term in nature, and where applicable, are sourced from third party information. Where these estimates and assumptions are unable to be sourced from third parties, the Group has used its own estimates based on the information available at reporting date. (v) Estimated useful economic life of wind turbines and associated plant As disclosed in Note 1(j) the Group depreciates wind turbines and associated plant, over 25 years, which is the estimated minimum useful economic life of these assets, based on current evaluations. It is possible that some of these assets will have useful economic lives in excess of 25 years in which case additional revenues will be received without a matching depreciation charge. (vi) Contingent liabilities As disclosed in Note 27, the Group or the Trust has made estimates and assumptions in relation to its contingent liabilities. By their nature, the exact value of these contingent liabilities is uncertain and the Group has made estimates of their value based on the facts and circumstances known at the reporting date. (e) Trade and other payables Trade payables and other accounts payable are recognised when the Group or the Trust becomes obliged to make future payments resulting from the purchase of goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition. notes to the consolidated financial statementscontinued 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) (f) Business combinations The purchase method of accounting is used to account for all business combinations, including business combinations involving entities or businesses under common control, regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets are acquired. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary comprises the fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group or the Trust. The consideration transferred also includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement and the fair value of any pre-existing equity interest in the subsidiary. Acquisition-related costs are capitalised. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any non-controlling interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s or Trust’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill (refer Note 1(p)). If the cost of acquisition is less than the Group’s or Trust’s share of the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement, but only after a reassessment of the identification and measurement of the net assets acquired. Where settlement of any part of cash consideration is deferred, the amounts payable in the future are discounted to their present value as at the date of exchange. The discount rate used is the entity’s incremental borrowing rate, being the rate at which a similar borrowing could be obtained from an independent financier under comparable terms and conditions. Contingent consideration is classified as either equity or a financial liability. Amounts classified as a financial liability are subsequently remeasured to fair value with changes in fair value recognised in profit and loss. (g) Borrowings Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. Borrowings are removed from the balance sheet when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expired. The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability that has been extinguished or transferred to another party and the consideration paid, including any non-cash assets transferred or liabilities assumed, is recognised in other income or other expenses. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group or the Trust has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date. (h) Borrowing costs Borrowing costs incurred for the construction of any qualifying assets are capitalised during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. Other borrowing costs are expensed. (i) Assets under construction Costs incurred in relation to assets under construction are deferred to future periods. Deferred costs are transferred to plant and equipment from the time the asset is held ready for use on a commercial basis. Revenue generated in advance of the asset being ready for use on a commercial basis is capitalised as a component of property, plant and equipment. (j) Property, plant and equipment Wind turbines and associated plant, including equipment under finance lease, are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the item. Cost may also include transfers from equity of any gains/losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. In the event that settlement of all or part of the purchase consideration is deferred, cost is determined by discounting the amounts payable in the future to their present value as at the date of acquisition. Subsequent costs, including replacement parts are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of any component accounted for as a separate asset is derecognised when replaced. The carrying amount of the replaced part is recognised. Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from the disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment and are included in the income statement. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the reporting period in which they are incurred. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. The Group’s policy is to provide for the future costs relating to the decommissioning of wind turbines and associated plant if the amounts are expected to result in an outflow of economic benefits. The cost of decommissioning wind turbines and associated plant is reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period. Depreciation is provided on wind turbines and associated plant. Depreciation is calculated on a straight line basis so as to write off the net cost or other revalued amount of each asset over its expected useful life to its estimated residual value. The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts, net of their residual values, over their estimated useful lives. Wind turbines and associated plant Solar panels and associated plant Fixtures and fittings Computer equipment 25 years 30 years 10-20 years 3-5 years (k) Derivative financial instruments The Group enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange rate risk, including forward foreign exchange contracts, interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured to their fair value at each reporting date. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in the income statement immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging instrument; in which event the timing of the recognition in the income statement depends on the nature of the hedge relationship. Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts | 77 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) The Group designates certain derivatives as either hedges of the cash flows of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges) or hedges of net investments in foreign operations (net investment hedges). At the inception of the hedging transaction the Group documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been and will continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. (i) Cash flow hedge The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in equity in the hedging reserve. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement within other income or other expenses. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the income statement in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss (for instance when the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of interest rate swaps hedging variable rate borrowings is recognised in the income statement within ‘finance costs’. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of forward foreign exchange contracts hedging overseas businesses is recognised in the income statement. However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset (for example, fixed assets) the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset. The deferred amounts are ultimately recognised in profit or loss as depreciation in the case of fixed assets. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain or loss deferred in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was deferred in equity is recognised immediately in the income statement. (ii) Net investment hedge Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognised in the foreign currency translation reserve; the gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses deferred in the foreign currency translation reserve are recognised immediately in the income statement when the foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold. (iii) Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised immediately in the income statement. (l) Goods and services tax (GST) Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST unless the GST incurred is not recoverable 78 | iNfigeN eNeRgY aNNual RepoRt 2014 from the taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense. Receivables and payables are stated exclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the balance sheet. Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST component of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to the taxation authority, are presented as operating cash flows. (m) Segment reporting Operating segments are reported in a manner that is consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The Group has determined the operating segments based on reports reviewed by the Board of Directors of IEL that are used to make strategic decisions. (n) Foreign currency translation (i) Functional and presentation currency Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s or the Trust’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is the Group’s and the Trust’s presentation currency. (ii) Transactions and balances Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement, except when they are deferred in equity as qualifying net investment hedges or are attributable to part of the net investment in a foreign operation. Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets and liabilities such as equities held at fair value through profit or loss are recognised in profit or loss as part of the fair value gain or loss. (iii) Group or the Trust companies The results and financial position of all Group or Trust entities (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows: ƒ assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet; ƒ income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates (unless this is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the dates of the transactions); and ƒ all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of any net investment in foreign entities including balances of cash held in foreign currency, and of borrowings and other financial instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to shareholders’ equity. When a foreign operation is sold or any borrowings forming part of the net investment are repaid, a proportionate share of such exchange differences is recognised in the income statement, as part of the gain or loss on sale where applicable. notes to the consolidated financial statementscontinued 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entities and translated at the closing rate. (o) Income tax (i) Current tax Current tax expense is calculated by reference to the amount of income taxes payable or recoverable in respect of the taxable profit or tax loss for the period. It is calculated using tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Current tax for current and prior periods is recognised as a liability (or asset) to the extent that it is unpaid (or refundable). (ii) Deferred tax Deferred tax expense is accounted for using the comprehensive balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax base of those items. In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses. However, deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary differences giving rise to them arise from the initial recognition of assets and liabilities (other than as a result of a business combination) which affects neither taxable income nor accounting profit. Furthermore, a deferred tax liability is not recognised in relation to taxable temporary differences arising from goodwill. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences associated with these investments and interests are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which to realise the benefits of the temporary differences and they are expected to reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period(s) when the asset and liability giving rise to them are realised or settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Group expects, at the reporting date, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the company/Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. (iii) Current and deferred tax for the period Current and deferred tax is recognised as an expense or income in the income statement, except when it relates to items credited or debited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised directly in equity, or where it arises from the initial accounting for a business combination, in which case it is taken into account in the determination of goodwill or excess. Under current Bermudian law, IEBL will not be subject to any income, withholding or capital gains taxes in Bermuda. Current and deferred tax is determined with reference to the tax jurisdiction in which the relevant entity resides. (iv) Tax consolidation IEL and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities have implemented the Australian tax consolidation legislation. The head entity, IEL, and the controlled entities in the tax consolidated group continue to account for their own current and deferred tax amounts. These tax amounts are measured as if each entity in the tax consolidated group continues to be a stand alone taxpayer in its own right. In addition to its own current and deferred amounts, IEL also recognises the current tax liabilities (or assets) and the deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from controlled entities in the tax consolidated group. Assets or liabilities arising under tax funding agreements with the tax consolidated entities are recognised as amounts receivable from or payable to other entities in the group. Details about the tax funding agreement are disclosed in Note 6. Any difference between the amounts assumed and amounts receivable or payable under the tax funding agreement are recognised as a contribution to (or distribution from) wholly- owned tax consolidated entities. Under current legislation, IET is not subject to income tax as unit holders are presently entitled to the income of IET. (p) Intangible assets (i) Project-related agreements and licences Project-related agreements and licences include the following items: ƒ licences, permits and approvals to develop and operate a wind farm, including governmental authorisations, land rights and environmental consents; ƒ interconnection rights; and ƒ power purchase agreements. Project-related agreements and licences are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of licences over their estimated useful lives, which are based on the lease term of the related wind farm. (ii) Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisition is separately disclosed in the balance sheet. Goodwill acquired in business combinations is not amortised, but tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the goodwill may be impaired. Any impairment is amortised immediately in the income statement and is not subsequently reversed. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units (“CGU”) for the purpose of impairment testing. Each of those cash-generating units represents the Group’s investment in each country of operation by each primary reporting segment. Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts | 79 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) (iii) Development assets Development assets represent development costs incurred prior to commencement of construction for wind and solar farms. Expenditure on start-up activities, such as loan costs are transferred to capitalised loan costs when incurred. Development assets are not amortised, but are transferred to plant and equipment and depreciated from the time the asset is held ready for use on a commercial basis. (q) Leased assets Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases. (i) Group as lessee Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised at their fair value; or, if lower, at amounts equal to the present value of the minimum lease payments, each determined at the inception of the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly against income, unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are recognised in accordance with the Group’s or the Trust’s general policy on borrowing costs. Finance leased assets are amortised on a straight line basis over the shorter of the lease term and estimated useful life of the asset. Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed. In the event that lease incentives are received to enter into operating leases, such incentives are recognised as a liability. The aggregate benefits of incentives are recognised as a reduction of rental expense on a straight line basis, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed. (ii) Group as lessor Refer to Note 1(v) for the accounting policy in respect of lease income from operating leases. (r) Impairment of assets At each reporting date, the group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that the carrying values have been impaired. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group has estimated the recoverable amount of the CGU to which the asset belongs. Goodwill, intangible assets with indefinite useful lives (project agreements and licences) and intangible assets not yet available for use (development assets) are tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. An impairment of goodwill is not subsequently reversed. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of 80 | iNfigeN eNeRgY aNNual RepoRt 2014 money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. Refer to Note 15 for details of the value-in-use assumptions. For assessing impairment, if the recoverable amount of an asset (or CGU) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (CGU) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised in the income statement immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at fair value, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (CGU) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (CGU) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in the income statement immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at fair value, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. (s) Cash and cash equivalents For cash flow statement presentation purposes, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value, net of outstanding bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet. (t) Provisions Provisions are recognised when the Group or the Trust has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount of the provision can be measured reliably. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses. The amount recognised as a provision is management’s best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows. When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, the receivable is recognised as an asset if it is probable that recovery will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably. (u) Distributions and dividends Provision is made for the amount of any declared distribution or dividend which has been appropriately authorised on or before the end of the financial year and which is no longer at the discretion of the entity, but not distributed at balance date. (v) Revenue recognition Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of returns, trade allowances, rebates and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The Group or the Trust recognises revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and specific criteria have been met for each of the Group’s or Trust’s activities as described below. notes to the consolidated financial statementscontinued 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) The amount of revenue is not considered to be reliably measurable until all contingencies relating to the sale have been resolved. The Group or the Trust bases its estimates on historical results, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and the specifics of each arrangement. Revenue is recognised for the major business activities as follows: (i) Electricity sales Product sales are generated from the sale of electricity generated from the Group’s wind farms. Revenues from product sales are recognised on an accruals basis. Product sales revenue is only recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products have passed to the buyer and the Group attains the right to be compensated. (ii) Lease income In accordance with UIG 4 Determining whether an Asset Contains a Lease, revenue that is generated under certain power purchase agreements, where the Group sells substantially all of the related electricity to one customer, is classified as lease income. Lease income from operating leases is recognised in income on an accruals basis. Lease income is only recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products have passed to the buyer and the Group attains the right to be compensated. (iii) Large-scale Generation Certificates (LGCs) (formerly Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)) In accordance with AASB 102 revenue from the sale of LGCs is recognised at fair value when they are generated. By recognising LGCs at fair value, income is recognised in the same period as the costs incurred. AASB 102 requires LGCs held in inventory to be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value at the end of each reporting period. Hence where the market value of LGCs falls, inventory is reduced and expense is recorded through the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Where the circumstances that caused the inventory to be written-down have changed, the write-down will be reversed. Upon sale, the difference between the sale price and the book value of the inventory is recorded through the Statement of Comprehensive Income as a component of revenue. (iv) Production Tax Credits (PTCs) PTCs are recognised as other income when generated by the underlying wind farm assets and used to settle the obligation to Class A institutional investors. (v) Accelerated tax depreciation credits and operating tax gains/(losses) The tax losses arising from accelerated tax depreciation result in benefits that are used to settle the obligation to Class A institutional investors. The associated benefits arising from accelerated tax depreciation are held on the balance sheet as deferred revenue (a component of ‘Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities’) and recognised in revenue over the life of the wind farms to which they relate. (vi) Government grants Grants from government are recognised at their fair value where there is a reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and the Group will comply with all attached conditions. Government grants relating to costs are deferred and recognised in the income statement over the period necessary to match them with the costs that they are intended to compensate. (vii) Other income Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established. Revenue from rendering of services is recognised when services are provided. (w) Loans and receivables Trade receivables, loans and other receivables are recorded at amortised cost less impairment. Trade receivables are generally due for settlement within 30 days. A provision for impairment of loans and receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group or the Trust will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of loans and receivables. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the effective interest rate. The amount of the impairment loss is recognised in the income statement within other expenses. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against other expenses in the income statement. (x) Contributed equity Ordinary shares and units are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares, units or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options for the acquisition of a business are not included in the cost of the acquisition as part of the purchase consideration. If the entity reacquires its own equity instruments, for example, as the result of a share buy-back, those instruments are deducted from equity and the associated shares are cancelled. No gain or loss is recognised in the profit or loss and the consideration paid including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes) is recognised directly in equity. (y) Earnings per security/units Basic earnings per security/units is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Group or the Trust, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares/ units outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares/units issued during the year. Diluted earnings per security/unit adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per security to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares/units and the weighted average number of securities/units that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares/units. (z) Fair value estimation The fair value of the financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is determined using valuation techniques. The Group or the Trust uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance date. The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the balance sheet date. These instruments are classified in the level 2 fair value hierarchy (refer to Note 35). Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts | 81 1. summary of accounting policies (continued) The carrying amounts of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group or the Trust for similar financial instruments. Available-for-sale financial assets Available-for-sale financial assets are recognised initially at fair value, based on the considerations paid for the interest. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition are added to the initial fair value of the instruments. Subsequently, all gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised directly in other comprehensive income except as follows: Interest calculated using the effective interest method is recognised in profit or loss; Foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary financial assets are recognised in profit or loss; and Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss. Available-for-sale assets are tested for impairment at each balance date. When a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale financial asset has been recognised directly in other comprehensive income and there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired, the cumulative loss that had been recognised directly in other comprehensive income is reclassified from equity and recognised in profit or loss. (aa) Employee benefits (i) Wages and salaries and annual leave Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non monetary benefits and annual leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance date in which employees render the related service are recognised in respect of employees’ services up to the balance date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The liability for annual leave and accumulating sick leave is recognised in payables. All other short- term employee benefit obligations are presented as provisions. (ii) Long service leave The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows. The obligations are presented as current liabilities in the balance sheet if the entity does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least twelve months after the balance date, regardless of when the actual settlement is expected to occur. (iii) Share-based payments Share-based compensation benefits are provided to certain executives via the Infigen Energy Equity Plan (“Equity Plan”). Information relating to the Equity Plan is set out in Note 25. The fair value of performance rights/units granted under the Equity Plan is measured at grant date and is recognised as an employee benefit expense over the period during which the executives become unconditionally entitled to the performance rights/units, with a corresponding increase in equity. (iv) Short term incentive plans The Group recognises a liability and an expense for short term incentives and takes into consideration the performance of the Group for the corresponding period. The Group recognises a provision where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. (v) Termination benefits Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated before the normal retirement date, or when an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognises termination benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either terminating the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal or providing termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after reporting date are discounted to present value. (bb) Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities (i) Class A members Initial contributions by Class A members into US partnerships are recognised at cost using the effective interest method. Class A carrying amounts are adjusted when actual cash flow differs from estimated cash flow. The adjustment is calculated by computing the present value of the actual difference using the original effective interest rate. The adjustment is recognised through income or expense in profit or loss. This difference represents the change in residual interest due to the Class A institutional investors. (ii) Class B members On consolidation of the US partnerships the Group’s Class B membership interest and associated finance charge for the year is eliminated and any external Class B member balances remaining represent net assets of US partnerships attributable to non- controlling interests. Refer 1(c) for further details of the Group’s accounting policy for consolidation. (cc) Rounding of amounts The Group or the Trust is of a kind referred to in Class order 98/0100, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, relating to the ‘rounding off’ of amounts in the financial report. Amounts in the financial report have been rounded off in accordance with that Class Order to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, the nearest dollar. (dd) New and amended standards adopted by the Group or the Trust The Group or the Trust has applied the following standards and amendments for the first time for their annual reporting period commencing 1 July 2013: (i) AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, AASB 11 Joint Arrangements, AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, (ii) AASB 127 Separate Financial Statements and AASB 2011-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements Standards 82 | iNfigeN eNeRgY aNNual RepoRt 2014 notes to the consolidated financial statementscontinued Under the Group’s previous accounting policy, interests in joint ventures were accounted for using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the Group combined its share of the jointly controlled entities’ individual income and expenses, assets and liabilities and cash flows on a line by line basis with similar items in the Group’s financial statements. This method is no longer permitted under AASB 11. Instead, interests in joint ventures must now be accounted for using the equity method. Under this method, the interests are initially recognised in the consolidated balance sheet at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the Group’s share of the post-acquisition profits or losses and movements in other comprehensive income in profit or loss and other comprehensive income respectively. When the Group’s share of losses in a joint venture equals or exceeds its interests in the joint ventures (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group’s net investment in the joint ventures), the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint ventures. Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the joint ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of the joint ventures have been changed where necessary, to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. As required under AASB 11, the change in policy has been applied retrospectively and, as consequence, adjustments were recognised in the balance sheet as of 1 July 2012. The tables below show the effect of the change in accounting policy on individual line items in each of the financial statements. The Group recognised its investment in the joint venture at the beginning of the earliest period presented (1 July 2012) as the total of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities previously proportionately consolidated, including any goodwill arising from the acquisition of the investment. This is the deemed cost of the Group’s investments in the joint venture for applying equity accounting. As a consequence, the change in policy did not have any impact on the Group’s net assets, items of equity, profit after tax and earnings per security. (iii) AASB 2012-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Transition Guidance and other Amendments which provides an exemption from the requirement to disclose the impact of the change in accounting policy on the current period (iv) AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement and AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 13 (v) AASB 119 Employee Benefits (September 2011) and AASB 2011-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 119 (September 2011) (vi) AASB 2012-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Annual Improvements 2009-2011 Cycle (vii) AASB 2012-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosures – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (viii) AASB 2011-4 Amendments Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements, Revised Corporations Regulations 2M.3.03 The adoption of AASB 11 resulted in changes in accounting policies and adjustments to the amounts recognised in the financial statements. These are explained and summarised below. The other standards only affected the disclosures in the notes to the financial statements. The Group also elected to early adopt AASB 2013-3 Amendments to AASB 136 – Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets, which does not require the disclosure of the recoverable amount of a cash generating unit unless an impairment loss has been recognised or reversed during the year. (ee) Changes in accounting policy Consolidated financial statements and joint arrangements AASB 10 was issued in August 2011 and replaces the guidance on control and consolidation in AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and in Interpretation 112 Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities. Under the new principles, the Group or the Trust controls an entity when the Group or the Trust is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Both the Group and the Trust have reviewed their investments in other entities to assess whether the consolidation conclusion in relation to these entities is different under AASB 10 than under AASB 127. Under AASB 11 investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations each investor has, rather than the legal structure of the joint arrangement. The Group and the Trust have assessed the nature of their joint arrangements and have determined that seven of the Group’s twelve joint arrangements in the US are classified as joint ventures in accordance with AASB 11. Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts | 83 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 1. Summary of accounting policies (continued) The impact of this change in the Group’s accounting policy on individual line items in the financial statements can be summarised as follows: Consolidated statements of comprehensive income Revenue from continuing operations Income from institutional equity partnerships Other income Operating expenses Corporate costs Other expenses Depreciation and amortisation expense Impairment expense Interest expense Finance costs relating to institutional equity partnerships Other finance costs Share of net (losses)/profits of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method Net loss before income tax benefit Income tax benefit Net loss for the year Other comprehensive income Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax Total comprehensive loss for the year 2013 (Previously stated) $’000 Profit increase/ (decrease) $’000 2013 (Restated) $’000 302,640 78,786 4,471 (115,854) (14,124) (3,276) (137,888) (58,362) (71,593) (52,805) (16,362) (42,968) (26,828) 599 19,439 – – 23,748 18,976 – 8,999 948 259,672 51,958 5,070 (96,415) (14,124) (3,276) (114,140) (39,386) (71,593) (43,806) (15,414) (86) (2,913) (2,999) (84,453) 4,478 (79,975) 10,862 26,408 37,270 (42,705) – – – – – – – (84,453) 4,478 (79,975) 10,862 26,408 37,270 (42,705) 84 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 1. Summary of accounting policies (continued) Consolidated balance sheets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventory Derivative financial instruments 30 June 2013 (Previously stated) $’000 Increase/ (decrease) $’000 30 June 2013 (Restated) $’000 1 July 2012 (Previously stated) $’000 Increase/ (decrease) $’000 1 July 2012 (Restated) $’000 124,524 44,182 13,756 2,585 (3,311) (5,804) (1,138) – 121,213 38,378 12,618 2,585 126,703 39,944 15,736 3,242 (4,023) (6,420) – – 122,680 33,524 15,736 3,242 Total current assets 185,047 (10,253) 174,794 185,625 (10,443) 175,182 Non-current assets Receivables Derivative financial instruments Investment in associates and joint ventures Property, plant and equipment Deferred tax assets Intangible assets 5,513 438 922 2,478,019 46,503 272,060 – – 97,046 (466,916) – 3,558 5,513 438 97,968 2,011,103 46,503 275,618 8,590 579 728 2,435,300 48,359 318,044 – – 102,936 (438,326) – (13,968) 8,590 579 103,664 1,996,974 48,359 304,076 Total non-current assets 2,803,455 (366,312) 2,437,143 2,811,600 (349,358) 2,462,242 Total assets 2,988,502 (376,565) 2,611,937 2,997,225 (359,801) 2,637,424 Current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Derivative financial instruments Current tax liabilities Provisions 36,561 31,164 52,187 – 2,795 (2,731) – – – – 33,830 31,164 52,187 – 2,795 40,005 56,000 42,578 3,660 3,449 (4,099) – – – – 35,906 56,000 42,578 3,660 3,449 Total current liabilities 122,707 (2,731) 119,976 145,692 (4,099) 141,593 Non-current liabilities Borrowings Derivative financial instruments Provisions 1,028,879 102,520 26,539 (1,464) – (7,570) 1,027,415 102,520 18,969 1,013,214 148,575 6,778 (1,326) – – 1,011,888 148,575 6,778 Total non-current liabilities 1,157,938 (9,034) 1,148,904 1,168,567 (1,326) 1,167,241 Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity holders of the parent Contributed equity Reserves Retained earnings Equity holders of the other stapled entities (non-controlling interests) Contributed equity Retained earnings Total equity 1,223,842 (364,800) 859,042 1,157,133 (354,376) 802,757 2,504,487 (376,565) 2,127,922 2,471,392 (359,801) 2,111,591 484,015 2,305 (208,349) (47,495) (253,539) 759,337 (21,783) 737,554 484,015 – – – – – – – – – 484,015 525,833 2,305 (208,349) (47,495) 2,305 (246,506) 31,825 (253,539) (212,376) 759,337 (21,783) 737,554 484,015 759,337 (21,128) 738,209 525,833 – – – – – – – – – 525,833 2,305 (246,506) 31,825 (212,376) 759,337 (21,128) 738,209 525,833 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 85 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 1. Summary of accounting policies (continued) Consolidated cash flow statements Cash flows from operating activities Loss for the year Adjustments for: Interests in institutional equity partnerships (Gain)/Loss on revaluation for fair value through profit or loss financial assets – financial instruments Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets Impairment expense Unrealised foreign exchange (gains)/losses Amortisation/(de-recognition) of share based payments expense Amortisation of borrowing costs capitalised Share of losses/(profits) from associates and joint ventures Distributions received from associates and joint ventures Accretion of decommissioning and restoration provisions (Decrease) in current tax liability (Increase) in deferred tax assets Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition and disposal of businesses (Increase)/decrease in assets: Current receivables and other current assets Increase/(decrease) in liabilities: Current payables Non-current payables Net cash from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Payments for property, plant and equipment Payments for intangible assets Payments for investment in associates and joint ventures Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Repayment of borrowings Distributions paid to institutional equity partnerships Net cash used in financing activities Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year Effects of exchange rate on the balance of cash held in foreign currencies 2013 (Previously stated) $’000 Increase / (decrease) $’000 2013 (Restated) $’000 (79,975) – (79,975) (25,981) 17,829 (8,152) (1,832) 137,888 58,362 5,049 828 1,492 86 – 2,744 (1,920) (3,902) – (23,748) (18,976) – – – 2,913 13,883 (928) – – (1,832) 114,140 39,386 5,049 828 1,492 2,999 13,883 1,816 (1,920) (3,902) 937 (1,116) (179) 3,903 96 1,402 (1) 5,305 95 97,775 (8,742) 89,033 (11,042) (10,070) (281) (21,393) (59,069) (23,409) (82,478) (6,096) 126,703 3,917 3,009 – – 3,009 – 6,759 6,759 1,026 (4,038) (299) (8,033) (10,070) (281) (18,384) (59,069) (16,650) (75,719) (5,070) 122,665 3,618 Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 124,524 (3,311) 121,213 (ff) New standards and interpretations not yet adopted by the Group or the Trust Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for 30 June 2014 reporting periods and have not been early adopted by the Group or the Trust. The Group’s or the Trust’s assessment of the impact of these new standards and interpretations is set out below. (i) AASB 9 Financial Instruments. AASB 9 Financial Instruments addresses the classification, measurement and derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. Since December 2013, it also sets out new rules for hedge accounting. The standard is not applicable until 1 January 2017, however this may be revised again once the IASB has agreed on a mandatory date for the equivalent international standard. When adopted, it is likely to affect the Group’s or 86 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 the Trust’s accounting for its financial assets since AASB 9 only permits the recognition of fair value gains and losses in other comprehensive income if they relate to equity investments that are not held for trading. Fair value gains and losses on available- for-sale debt investments, for example, will therefore have to be recognised directly in profit or loss. The new hedging rules align hedge accounting more closely with the Group’s or the Trust’s risk management practices. As a general rule it will be easier to apply hedge accounting going forward. The new standard also introduces expanded disclosure requirements and changes in presentation. In order to apply the hedging rules, the Group or the Trust would have to adopt AASB 9 and the consequential amendments to AASB 7 and AASB139 in their entirety. The Group has not yet decided whether to early adopt AASB 9 and has not assessed the effect. 1. Summary of accounting policies (continued) (ii) AASB 2012-3 Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments do not change the current offsetting rules in AASB 132 but they clarify that the right to set-off must be available today (i.e. not contingent on a future event) and must be legally enforceable in the normal course of business as well as in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy. This is applicable to reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2014. The Group has not yet assessed the effect of this amendment. (iii) AASB 2013-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting. The AASB has made a limited scope amendment to AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. AASB 139 requires an entity to stop hedge accounting when a novation (replacement of one party of the derivative contract with a new party) occurs because the original hedging instrument envisaged in the hedge documentation has changed. The amendment allows the continuation of hedge accounting provided specific conditions are met. This is applicable to reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2014. The Group has not yet assessed the effect of this amendment. There are no other standards that are not yet effective and that are expected to have a material impact on the entity in the current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions. (gg) Parent entity financial information The financial information for the parent entity, Infigen Energy Limited and IET, disclosed in Note 36, has been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements, except as set out below. (i) Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities are accounted for at cost in the financial statements of Infigen Energy Limited and IET. Dividends received from associates are recognised in the parent entity’s profit or loss, rather than being deducted from the carrying amount of these investments. (ii) Tax consolidation legislation Infigen Energy Limited and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities have implemented the Australian tax consolidation legislation. The head entity, Infigen Energy Limited, and the controlled entities in the tax consolidated group account for their own current and deferred tax amounts. These tax amounts are measured as if each entity in the tax consolidated group continues to be a standalone taxpayer in its own right. In addition to its own current and deferred tax amounts, Infigen Energy Limited also recognises the current tax liabilities (or assets) and the deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from controlled entities in the tax consolidated group. The entities have also entered into a tax funding agreement under which the wholly-owned entities fully compensate Infigen Energy Limited for any current tax payable assumed and are compensated by Infigen Energy Limited for any current tax receivable and deferred tax assets relating to unused tax losses or unused tax credits that are transferred to Infigen Energy Limited under the tax consolidation legislation. The funding amounts are determined by reference to the amounts recognised in the wholly-owned entities’ financial statements. The amounts receivable/payable under the tax funding agreement are due upon receipt of the funding advice from the head entity, which is issued as soon as practicable after the end of each financial year. The head entity may also require payment of interim funding amounts to assist with its obligations to pay tax instalments. Assets or liabilities arising under tax funding agreements with the tax consolidated entities are recognised as current amounts receivable from or payable to other entities in the Group. Any difference between the amounts assumed and amounts receivable or payable under the tax funding agreement are recognised as a contribution to (or distribution from) wholly- owned tax consolidated entities. (iii) Financial guarantees Where the parent entity has provided financial guarantees in relation to loans and payables of subsidiaries for no compensation, the fair values of these guarantees are accounted for as contributions and recognised as part of the cost of the investment. noteS to the conSolidAted finAnciAl StAtementS | 87 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED The entity also has a controlling interest in two US LLCs in which it owns more than 50% but less than 100% of the Class B interests. Under IFRS, the Group fully consolidates the financial performance of these companies within its statutory results and recognises a non-controlling interest. Under the economic interest basis, the non-controlling interests are excluded from the Group’s results. Interest income and expenditure are not allocated to segments, as this type of activity is driven by the corporate treasury function, which manages the cash position of the Group. The Board of Directors reviews segment revenues on a proportional basis, reflective of the economic ownership held by the Group. The adjustments shown for the equity accounted associates, joint ventures and non-controlling interests relate solely to the US segment. 2. Segment information a) Segment information provided to the Board of Directors The Group has determined the operating segments based on the reports reviewed by the Board of Directors of IEL that are used to make strategic decisions. The Board of Directors considers the business primarily from a geographic perspective and has identified two reportable segments. The reporting segments consist of the renewable energy businesses held within each geographical area. The Board of Directors assesses the performance of the operating segments based on a measure of EBITDA (Segment EBITDA). This measurement basis (Segment EBITDA) excludes the effects of equity-settled share-based payments which are included in Corporate costs and unrealised gains/losses on financial instruments. Segment EBITDA is calculated on an economic interest basis. The entity has joint control over interests in seven US LLCs in which it owns 50% to 59.3% of the Class B Interests. Under IFRS, these interests are included in the statutory results of the Group using the equity method. Under the economic interest basis, the equity accounted share of profits/losses from joint ventures, and investment in associates and joint ventures is grossed up to include the Group’s share of the financials on a line by line basis. The segment information provided to the Board of Directors for the operating segments together with a reconciliation of segment EBITDA to operating loss before income tax for the year ended 30 June 2014 is as follows: INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Allocated to segments on an economic interest basis Add: Share of profits of associates & JVs $’000 Statutory basis $’000 Less: Minority interests $’000 Economic interest basis $’000 Australia $’000 US $’000 Unallocated $’000 273,282 (102,212) 47,640 (21,295) (17,686) 303,236 5,783 (117,724) 145,438 (36,120) 157,798 (81,604) 171,070 26,345 (11,903) 185,512 109,318 76,194 – – – (13,582) (6,259) 13,705 4,309 169,243 (123,886) – – (13,705) (4) 12,636 (26,707) – – – – (13,582) (6,259) – 4,305 – – (13,582) (2,808) (3,451) – – – 4,305 77,048 (89,099) – – – (13,582) – (11,903) 169,976 106,510 8,875 (141,718) (52,619) 45,357 (14,071) (3,028) 28,258 53,891 (12,051) (13,582) (71,412) 31,205 (16,773) (11,623) 2,720 (8,903) (238) 14,381 238 2,790 – 72 (72) – – – – – (71,412) 48,376 (16,773) (11,551) 2,648 (57,220) – – (14,192) 48,376 (16,773) – – – (3,329) 2,648 5,360 (13,582) – – (8,903) (681) 5,360 (13,582) Year ended 30 June 2014 Segment revenue Operating costs Segment EBITDA from operations Corporate costs Development costs Share of profits of associates and joint ventures Gain on investments and other EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation EBIT Net finance costs Net income from IEPs Significant item – swap termination Loss before income tax Tax benefit/expense Net profit/(loss) after tax 88 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2. Segment information (continued) INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Allocated to segments on an economic interest basis Add: Share of profits of associates & JVs $’000 Statutory basis $’000 Less: Minority interests $’000 Economic interest basis $’000 Australia $’000 US $’000 Unallocated $’000 Year ended 30 June 2013 Segment revenue Operating costs Segment EBITDA from operations Corporate costs Development costs Share of profits of associates and joint ventures LGC revaluation and other EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation 259,672 (95,095) 42,968 (19,440) (16,538) 286,102 5,231 (109,304) 146,316 (36,280) 139,786 (73,024) 164,577 23,528 (11,307) 176,798 110,036 66,762 (14,124) (3,276) (2,999) (1,152) 143,026 (114,140) – (5) 2,999 – 26,522 (23,748) – – – – (14,124) (3,281) – (2,866) – – (1,152) (1,401) – (415) – 249 – – – (14,124) – – – (11,307) 158,241 105,769 7,615 (130,273) (50,891) 66,596 (79,382) (58,362) (14,124) – – Significant item – impairment (39,386) (18,976) – (58,362) – EBIT (10,500) (16,202) (3,692) (30,394) 54,878 (71,148) (14,124) Net finance costs Net income from IEPs Loss before income tax Tax benefit/expense Net profit/(loss) after tax (82,105) 8,152 (84,453) 4,478 (79,975) (1,542) 17,829 85 (85) – 367 3,325 (83,280) 29,306 (62,892) – (20,388) 29,306 – – – – – (84,368) (8,014) (62,230) (14,124) 4,393 4,393 – – (79,975) (3,621) (62,230) (14,124) A summary of assets and liabilities by operating segment is provided as follows: INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Allocated to segments on an economic interest basis Add: Share of assets and liabilities of associates & JVs $’000 Statutory basis $’000 Less: Minority interest $’000 Total economic interest basis $’000 Australia $’000 US $’000 2,526,436 345,549 (166,486) 2,705,499 1,177,398 1,528,101 As at 30 June 2014 Total segment assets Total assets includes: Investment in associates & joint ventures 96,292 (96,292) – – – – Additions to non-current assets (other than financial assets and deferred tax) 13,833 2,258 (377) 15,714 5,110 10,604 Total segment liabilities 2,034,378 345,549 (166,486) 2,213,441 815,374 1,398,067 As at 30 June 2013 Total segment assets Total assets includes: 2,611,937 376,564 (179,775) 2,808,726 1,258,947 1,549,779 Investment in associates & joint ventures 97,968 (97,046) – 922 922 – Additions to non-current assets (other than financial assets and deferred tax) 18,217 2,896 (586) 20,527 7,480 13,047 Total segment liabilities 2,127,922 376,564 (179,775) 2,324,711 857,523 1,467,188 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 89 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 3. Revenue From continuing operations Sale of energy and environmental products 1 Lease of plant and equipment 2 Compensated revenue Asset management services INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 76,965 190,208 2,059 4,050 83,290 170,219 2,520 3,643 273,282 259,672 1 2 Includes revenue from the sale of electricity and from the generation of environmental certificates. The Group generates environmental certificates (including LGCs) and sells them under contractual arrangements and on market. In accordance with UIG 4 Determining whether an Asset Contains a Lease, revenue that is generated under certain power purchase agreements, where the Group sells substantially all of the related electricity and environmental certificates to one customer, is classified as lease income. Refer Note 1(v) for further information. 4. Other income From continuing operations: Income from institutional equity partnerships Value of production tax credits offset against Class A liability 1 Value of tax benefits/(expenses) offset against Class A liability 1 Tax benefits recognised/(deferred) during the period1 Other income Interest income Interest income on financial asset 2 Net foreign exchange gains Fair value gains on financial instruments Gain on sale of development assets Other income INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 56,253 (14,653) 18,544 60,144 1,132 4,234 1,730 1,552 4,396 – 13,044 50,159 (4,495) 6,294 51,958 2,390 – – 1,832 – 848 5,070 – – – – 9 – – – – – 9 – – – – 14 – – – – – 14 1 Refer Note 19 for further details. 2 As at 30 June 2014, the available-for-sale financial instrument in relation to the investment in financial asset increased by $4,234,000 due to interest income. This is non-cash interest income that increases the value of the financial asset. 90 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 5. Expenses From continuing operations: Loss before income tax has been arrived at after charging the following expenses: Other expenses: Development costs Responsible Entity fees Depreciation and amortisation expense: Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (Note 14) Amortisation of intangible assets (Note 15) Impairment expense: Impairment of goodwill (Note 15) Impairment of project related agreements and licences (Note 15) Interest expense: Interest expense on borrowings Interest expense on derivative financial instruments Finance costs relating to institutional equity partnerships: Allocation of return on outstanding Class A liability 1 Movement in residual interest (Class A) 1 Movement in non-controlling interest (Class B) 1 Other finance costs: Significant item – interest rate swap termination Other fair value losses on financial instruments Foreign exchange losses Bank fees and loan amortisation costs Recognition and unwinding of discount on decommissioning provisions 1 Refer Note 19 for further details. INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 6,259 – 6,259 110,749 13,137 3,276 – 3,276 99,513 14,627 123,886 114,140 – – – 33,140 37,527 3,787 35,599 39,386 34,514 37,079 70,667 71,593 26,332 (3,467) 6,074 25,441 15,321 3,044 28,939 43,806 16,773 3,335 – 5,813 242 – – 9,078 4,520 1,816 26,163 15,414 – 636 636 – 620 620 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 91 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 6. Income taxes and deferred taxes (a) Income tax benefit Current tax Deferred tax Income tax benefit is attributable to: Loss from continuing operations Aggregate income tax benefit Deferred income tax (benefit)/expense included in income tax benefit comprises: Decrease in deferred tax assets Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax liabilities (b) Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense/(benefit) to prima facie tax payable: Loss from continuing operations before income tax (benefit)/expense Income tax benefit calculated at 30% (2013: 30%) Increase/(decrease) in tax benefit due to: Tax losses not recognised as an asset Impairment expenses in relation to US assets Unrealised foreign exchange movement Sundry items Income tax (benefit)/expense INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 (473) (2,247) 2013 $’000 (723) (3,755) (2,720) (4,478) (2,720) (2,720) 908 (3,155) (4,478) (4,478) 1,374 (5,129) (2,247) (3,755) INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 (11,623) (3,487) 1,539 – 1,150 (1,922) 2013 $’000 (84,453) (25,336) 4,802 17,509 (2,123) 670 (2,720) (4,478) (c) Amounts recognised directly in equity The following deferred amounts were not recognised in net profit or loss but charged directly to equity during the period: Deferred tax asset Deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 1,142 – 1,142 2013 $’000 (5,757) – (5,757) 92 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 6. Income taxes and deferred taxes (continued) (d) Tax losses Unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised Potential tax benefit @ 30% INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 533,831 453,832 160,149 136,150 (e) Tax consolidation IEL and its wholly-owned Australian resident entities have formed an Australian tax consolidated group with effect from 1 July 2003 and are therefore taxed as a single entity from that date. The head entity within the tax consolidated group is IEL. The members of the tax consolidated group are identified in Note 29. Entities within the tax consolidated group have entered into a tax funding arrangement and a tax sharing agreement with the head entity. Under the terms of the tax funding arrangement, IEL and each of the entities in the tax consolidated group has agreed to pay a tax equivalent payment to or from the head entity, based on the current tax liability or current tax asset of the entity. Such amounts are reflected in amounts receivable from or payable to other entities in the tax consolidated group. The tax sharing agreement entered into between members of the tax consolidated group provides for the determination of the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations. No amounts have been recognised in the financial statements in respect of this agreement as payment of any amounts under the tax sharing agreement is considered remote. (f) Current tax liabilities Income tax payable attributable to: Overseas entities in the Group INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 – – – – NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 93 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 6. Income taxes and deferred taxes (continued) (g) Deferred tax INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Opening balance $’000 Charged to income $’000 Charged to equity $’000 Acquisitions/ disposals $’000 Closing balance $’000 Year ended 30 June 2014 Gross deferred tax assets: Unused revenue tax losses Effect of hedge movements Unrealised foreign exchange loss Gross deferred tax liabilities: Depreciation Unrealised foreign exchange gains Other Total deferred tax assets Year ended 30 June 2013 Gross deferred tax assets: Unused revenue tax losses Effect of hedge movements Unrealised foreign exchange loss Gross deferred tax liabilities: Depreciation Unrealised foreign exchange gains Other 84,834 25,259 6,789 116,882 (58,984) (7,582) (3,813) (70,379) 2,939 (1,509) (1,777) (347) 1,203 3,496 (1,544) 3,155 – 1,142 – 1,142 – – – – 46,503 2,808 1,142 83,803 32,450 7,614 1,031 (1,434) (825) – (5,757) – 123,867 (1,228) (5,757) (59,380) (12,589) (3,539) (75,508) 396 5,007 (274) 5,129 – – – – Total deferred tax assets 48,359 3,901 (5,757) – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 87,773 24,892 5,012 117,677 (57,781) (4,086) (5,357) (67,224) 50,453 84,834 25,259 6,789 116,882 (58,984) (7,582) (3,813) (70,379) 46,503 Tax losses in the Australian business have been recognised as a deferred tax asset on the basis that it is expected the business will generate sufficient taxable earnings to fully utilise those losses. The generation of tax losses in the early years of operating long-term infrastructure assets to be utilised over the remaining life of the assets is expected. The assessment of future taxable income to support utilisation of tax losses in the Australian business is based on the long-term forecasts used for assessing asset impairment. Refer to Note 1(d)(ii) and Note 15 for key assumptions. Deferred tax assets to be recovered within 12 months Deferred tax assets to be recovered after more than 12 months Total deferred tax assets 94 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 – 50,543 50,543 2013 $’000 – 46,503 46,503 7. Key management personnel remuneration The responsible entity of Infigen Energy Trust is Infigen Energy RE Limited (IERL). (a) Details of key management personnel The following Directors were Key Management Personnel (KMP) of Infigen during the financial years ended 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013: ƒ Michael Hutchinson – Non-Executive Chairman ƒ Miles George – Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer ƒ Philip Green – Non-Executive Director ƒ Fiona Harris – Non-Executive Director ƒ Ross Rolfe AO – Non-Executive Director Other KMP of Infigen were: Name G Dutaillis 1 C Baveystock B Hopwood S Taylor 2 S Wright C Carson Role Chief Operating Officer Chief Financial Officer Executive General Manager – Corporate Finance Group General Manager – Australia General Counsel Executive General Manager Operations & CEO – USA 1 Employment ceased 30 June 2013. 2 Employment ceased 31 December 2013. 2014 2013 – P P – P P P P P P P P (b) Key management personnel remuneration KMP are not remunerated by the Trust. Payments made by the Trust to the responsible entity do not include any amounts attributable to the remuneration of KMPs. Non-Executive directors of IERL are remunerated by IERL. Other KMP of Infigen are remunerated by the Group. The aggregate remuneration of KMP of Infigen for the years ended 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013 is set out below: Short-term employee benefits 3 Post-employment benefits (superannuation) Other long-term benefits and equity-based incentive expense allocation 4 Write-back prior year’s long-term share-based incentive expense allocation Total 2014 $ 2013 $ 3,921,323 3,975,419 130,002 147,676 1,849,131 1,464,002 (471,000) (655,000) 5,429,456 4,932,097 Includes short-term incentives accrued in respect of the current period. 3 4 Share-based incentive expense allocations are subject to performance rights and units vesting in the future. FY14 equity settled adjusted for FY13 deferred STI granted in the period. (c) Rights and performance units held over Infigen securities During the year ended 30 June 2014 Performance Rights and units were granted to KMP under the Equity Plan. The FY12 deferred STI vested on 27 August 2013. Infigen issued 2,727,462 securities to satisfy the vested FY12 deferred STI obligation. Performance rights/units held by KMP over Infigen securities over the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 are set out below. The expense recognised in relation to the performance rights/units under the Equity Plan is recorded within corporate costs. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 95 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 7. Key management personnel remuneration (continued) Set out below are summaries of the number of performance rights and units granted to KMP: M George G Dutaillis B Hopwood C Baveystock S Taylor S Wright C Carson Balance at 30 June 2012 Granted Other changes 2 Balance at 30 June 2013 Granted Other changes 2 Balance at 30 June 2014 2,280,964 3,455,570 (556,462) 5,180,072 2,739,130 (807,128) 7,112,074 1,150,926 1,573,507 (2,724,433) 3 514,510 309,966 653,702 – 126,866 1 819,861 983,885 985,827 594,185 352,279 (86,808) – (87,132) 4 – – – 1,247,563 1,293,851 1,552,397 594,185 479,145 – 871,557 846,079 – (117,736) – – (1,552,397) – 2,001,384 2,139,930 – 599,407 919,933 – – 1,193,592 1,399,078 1 Granted before becoming a KMP. 2 Represents forfeitures due to vesting conditions not met. 3 Employment ceased 30 June 2013. 4 Employment ceased 31 December 2013. Refer to the table titled “Outstanding Performance Rights” in the Directors’ report for further details of the balances held at 30 June 2014. (d) Loans from Infigen to key personnel and their personally related entities No loans have been made by Infigen to KMP or their personally related parties during the years ended 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013. There are no other transactions with KMP. (e) Security holdings in Infigen Security holdings of KMPs, including their personally related parties, in Infigen securities over the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 are set out below. M Hutchinson P Green 1 F Harris R Rolfe AO M George C Baveystock B Hopwood S Taylor 2 S Wright C Carson Balance at 30 June 2012 Acquired during 2013 Sold Balance at 30 June 2013 Acquired during 2014 Other changes Balance at 30 June 2014 110,000 82,500 – 100,000 – 650,000 40,000 10,000 5,917 2 – – – – – – – – – – 100,000 – – – – – – – – – – 192,500 – 100,000 – 650,000 1,076,995 40,000 10,000 5,917 – 100,000 289,377 266,071 291,319 271,897 – – – – – (229,377) (250,000) (291,389) (271,897) 192,500 – 100,000 – 1,726,995 100,000 26,071 N/A – – 100,000 1 Mr Green is a partner of The Children’s Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP which has a substantial shareholding of Infigen securities. Mr Green has advised Infigen that he does not have a relevant interest in those Infigen securities. 2 Employment ceased 31 December 2013. 96 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 8. Remuneration of auditors During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity and the Trust their related practices and non-related audit firms: Audit services by: Auditors of the Company (PricewaterhouseCoopers) Australia Audit and review of the financial statements Audit and review of subsidiaries’ financial statements Overseas Audit and review of the financial statements Audit and review of subsidiaries’ financial statements Other services by: Auditors of the Company (PricewaterhouseCoopers) Australia Taxation compliance and advisory services Due diligence services Accounting advisory services Overseas Taxation compliance and advisory services Liquidation services INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $ 2013 $ 2014 $ 2013 $ 635,000 80,000 110,000 489,830 645,000 90,000 110,000 405,830 20,000 26,100 – – – – – – 1,314,830 1,250,830 20,000 26,100 81,000 – 50,000 – 25,844 73,500 210,000 – 1,280 37,644 156,844 322,424 – – – – – – – – – – – – Total remuneration of auditors 1,471,674 1,573,254 20,000 26,100 9. Trade and other receivables INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP Current Trade receivables Prepayments (Note 9(f)) Other receivables 2014 $’000 25,426 8,073 4,190 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 25,941 10,955 1,482 37,689 38,378 – – – – – – – – Non-current Amounts due from related parties – associates (Note 32(c)) Prepayments (Note 9(f)) 804 4,121 4,925 764 4,749 742,619 741,820 – – 5,513 742,619 741,820 (a) Past due but not impaired There were no trade receivables that were past due but not impaired as at 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013. Refer to Note 35 for more information. The other classes within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets and are not past due. Based on the credit history of these other classes, it is expected that these amounts will be received when due. The Group or the Trust does not hold any collateral in relation to these receivables. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 97 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 9. Trade and other receivables (continued) (b) Impairment of trade receivables There were no impaired trade receivables for the Group or the Trust as at 30 June 2014 or 30 June 2013. (c) Other receivables These amounts generally arise from transactions outside the usual operating activities of the Group or the Trust. (d) Foreign exchange and interest rate risk Information about the Group’s or the Trust’s exposure to foreign currency risk and interest rate risk in relation to trade and other receivables is provided in Note 35. (e) Fair value and credit risk Due to the nature of these receivables, their carrying amount is assumed to approximate their fair value. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying amount of each class of receivables mentioned above. Refer to Note 35 for more information on the risk management policy of the Group or the Trust and the credit quality of the Group’s or the Trust’s trade receivables. (f) Prepayments Included within current and non-current prepayments is $8,073,000 (2013: $10,955,000) and $4,121,000 (2013: $4,749,000) of prepaid operational expenses. 10. Inventory Environmental certificates Spare parts 11. Derivative financial instruments & Investment in financial assets Current assets At fair value: electricity option At fair value: FX forward option Non-current assets At fair value: interest rate swaps At fair value: interest rate caps Investment in financial assets Current liabilities At fair value: interest rate swaps Non-current liabilities At fair value: interest rate swaps Refer to Note 35 for further information. 98 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2014 $’000 12,914 3,250 2013 $’000 (Restated) 9,046 3,572 16,164 12,618 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 – 994 994 164 139 303 86,384 86,384 33,964 33,964 49 2,536 2,536 – 438 438 – – 52,187 52,187 98,343 102,520 98,343 102,520 12. Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures (a) Movements in carrying amounts Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Share of profits after income tax Impairment expense Distributions received Effects of exchange rate changes Carrying amount at the end of the period INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 97,968 13,705 – (13,649) (1,732) 2013 $’000 (Restated) 103,664 15,977 (18,976) (13,883) 11,186 96,292 97,968 (b) Interest in associates and joint ventures Set out below are the associates of the Group as at 30 June 2014. The interests listed below have share capital consisting solely of ordinary shares, which are held directly by the Group. The country of incorporation or registration is also their principal place of business. Place of business/ country of incorporation 30 June 2014 30 June 2013 Nature of relationship Measurement method Ownership interest % 30 June 2014 Sweetwater 1 LLC Sweetwater 2 LLC Blue Canyon 1 LLC Combine Hills 1 LLC Sweetwater 3 LLC Wind Park Jersey LLC Sweetwater 4-5 LLC US US US US US US US 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 59.3% 53% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 59.3% 53% Joint venture Equity method Joint venture Equity method Joint venture Equity method Joint venture Equity method Joint venture Equity method Joint venture Equity method Joint venture Equity method Australian associate entities Australia 32%–50% 32%–50% Associate Equity method All US joint ventures held Class B interests in wind farm operating entities. The Australian associate entities held interests in renewable energy developments. All associates and joint ventures are private entities and therefore no quoted securities prices are available. (c) Contingent liabilities in respect of associates and joint ventures Letters of credit Letters of credit generally relate to wind farm construction, operations and decommissioning and represent the maximum exposure. These are incurred jointly with other investors of the associate or joint venture. 2014 $’000 1,358 2013 $’000 1,464 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 99 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 12. Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures (continued) (d) Summarised financial information of associates and joint ventures The Group’s share of the results of its principal associates and joint ventures and its aggregated assets and liabilities are as follows: 30 June 2014 Sweetwater 1 LLC Sweetwater 2 LLC Blue Canyon 1 LLC Combine Hills 1 LLC Sweetwater 3 LLC Wind Park Jersey LLC Sweetwater 4-5 Australian associate entities Year ended 30 June 2013 Sweetwater 1 LLC Sweetwater 2 LLC Blue Canyon 1 LLC Combine Hills 1 LLC Sweetwater 3 LLC Wind Park Jersey LLC Sweetwater 4–5 Australian associate entities Company’s share of: Assets $’000 Liabilities $’000 Revenues $’000 Share of profit $’000 15,182 43,063 25,063 22,246 64,338 20,023 252,729 1,252 11,362 36,937 12,842 9,010 58,385 19,247 199,575 246 2,150 4,728 3,554 2,488 7,227 3,050 24,460 – 232 543 1,336 661 2,525 (493) 8,986 (85) 443,896 347,604 47,657 13,705 16,191 45,723 27,208 23,108 68,714 23,337 269,329 1,023 12,538 39,987 16,103 10,693 65,114 21,060 2,038 4,500 3,249 2,391 6,817 2,306 211,101 22,534 69 – 675 2,117 1,618 487 2,165 422 8,578 (85) 474,633 376,665 43,835 15,977 13. Fair value measurement of financial instruments & Investment in financial assets (a) Fair value measurements The Group measures and recognises the following assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis: ƒ Derivative financial instruments ƒ Financial assets The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy: (a) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1) (b) inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices) (level 2); and (c) inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (level 3). 100 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 13. Fair value measurement of financial instruments & Investment in financial assets (continued) The following tables present the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured and recognised at fair value at 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013. Level 1 $’000 Level 2 $’000 Level 3 $’000 Total $’000 As at 30 June 2014 Assets Derivative financial instruments FX option Interest rate cap – Woodlawn Interest rate swaps – Union Bank Facility Financial assets Investment in financial assets Total assets Liabilities Derivative financial instruments Interest rate swaps – Global Facility Interest rate swaps – Woodlawn Interest rate swaps – Union Bank Facility Total liabilities As at 30 June 2013 Assets Derivative financial instruments FX option Interest rate cap – Woodlawn Total assets Liabilities Derivative financial instruments Interest rate swaps – Global Facility Interest rate swaps – Woodlawn Total liabilities – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 994 139 164 – 1,297 131,298 100 909 132,307 2,585 438 3,023 153,793 914 154,707 – – – 994 139 164 86,384 86,384 86,384 87,681 – – – – – – – – – – 131,298 100 909 132,307 2,585 438 3,023 153,793 914 154,707 Effective 31 October 2013 a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Group acquired a financial asset for USD79,163,500 (AUD84,894,000), being an investment in IJA Portfolio LLC, an unlisted entity which holds investments in Class A interests of Group related US wind farm project entities. IJA Portfolio LLC is a private investing entity for which it is not possible to determine the fair value of this investment using quoted prices or observable market data. As such, the investment has been classified as level 3 for the purposes of the disclosure requirements of AASB113 Fair Value Measurement. Effective 1 January 2014 a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Group acquired financial assets for USD13,350,000 (AUD15,076,000), being an investment in Class A interests two Group related US wind farm project entities. These investments are in private investing entities for which it is not possible to determine the fair value of these investments using quoted prices or observable market data. As such, the investments have been classified as level 3 for the purposes of the disclosure requirements of AASB113 Fair Value Measurement. The Group’s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels at the end of the reporting period. The Group did not measure any financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis as at 30 June 2014. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 101 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 13. Fair value measurement of financial instruments & Investment in financial assets (continued) (b) Valuation techniques used to derive level 2 and level 3 fair values The fair value of derivative financial instruments not traded in an active market (for example, interest rate derivatives) is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques utilise observable market data and do not rely upon entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value derivative financial instruments are observable, the instrument is included in level 2. If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3. This is the case for financial assets (available-for-sale). Financial assets (available-for-sale) represent an investment in a privately held joint arrangement that holds tax equity interests in US wind farm projects. The financial asset entitles the Group to specified cash flows and returns in accordance with the contractual arrangements. Specific valuation techniques used to value derivative financial instruments include: ƒ The use of quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments ƒ The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves ƒ The fair value of FX options is determined using forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date ƒ Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments. This includes the financial assets (available-for-sale). All of the resulting fair value estimates are included in level 2 except for the financial asset (available-for-sale) explained in (c) below. The best evidence of fair value is current prices in an active market for similar financial assets. Where such information is not available the Directors consider information from a variety of sources including: ƒ Discounted cash flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows ƒ Capitalisation rate derived from an analysis of market evidence. All resulting fair value estimates for financial assets are included in level 3. (c) Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) (i) The following table presents the changes in level 3 items for the year ended 30 June 2014: Opening balance at 30 June 2013 Acquisitions Interest income on financial asset Distributions received as return of investment Net foreign currency exchange differences Closing balance at 30 June 2014 Investment in financial assets (available-for-sale) IJA Portfolio LLC $’000 – 100,001 4,234 (16,442) (1,409) 86,384 There were no transfers between level 2 and level 3 financial instruments during the period. (ii) Valuation inputs and relationships to fair value The following table summarises the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in level 3 fair value measurements. Description Financial assets (available-for-sale) Fair value at 30 June 2014 $’000 86,384 Valuation techniques Discounted cash flows Range of inputs (probability- weighted average) Discount rates 11%–11.5% Relationship to unobservable inputs to fair value An increase or decrease in discount rate of 100bps would change the fair value by approximately $3,153,000 (iii) Valuation processes The Group performs the valuations of level 3 financial instruments in-house for financial reporting purposes. These valuations are prepared half-yearly and reviewed by the finance teams, Chief Financial Officer and the board Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee. 102 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 14. Property, plant and equipment At 30 June 2012 (Restated) Cost or fair value Accumulated depreciation Net book value Year ended 30 June 2013 (Restated) Opening net book value Additions Additions due to recognition of decommissioning assets Transfers to intangible assets Disposals Depreciation expense Net foreign currency exchange differences Closing net book value At 30 June 2013 (Restated) Cost or fair value Accumulated depreciation Net book value Year ended 30 June 2014 Opening net book value Additions Transfers to intangible assets Disposals Depreciation expense Net foreign currency exchange differences Closing net book value At 30 June 2014 Cost or fair value Accumulated depreciation Net book value INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Plant & Equipment $’000 Total $’000 2,425,237 2,425,237 (428,263) (428,263) 1,996,974 1,996,974 1,996,974 1,996,974 8,033 9,242 (4,116) (1,717) 8,033 9,242 (4,116) (1,717) (99,513) 102,200 (99,513) 102,200 2,011,103 2,011,103 2,569,257 2,569,257 (558,154) (558,154) 2,011,103 2,011,103 2,011,103 2,011,103 10,980 (2,619) (3,581) 10,980 (2,619) (3,581) (110,749) (110,749) (9,725) (9,725) 1,895,409 1,895,409 2,564,312 2,564,312 (668,903) (668,903) 1,895,409 1,895,409 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 103 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 15. Intangible assets INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Goodwill $’000 Development assets $’000 Project- related agreements and licences $’000 Total $’000 18,623 25,385 – – 304,979 (44,911) 348,987 (44,911) 18,623 25,385 260,068 304,076 18,623 25,385 260,068 – – – – – (3,787) 300 7,928 (905) – – – – – 2,142 905 4,116 (1,549) (14,627) (35,599) 12,618 304,076 10,070 – 4,116 (1,549) (14,627) (39,386) 12,918 15,136 32,408 228,074 275,618 15,136 32,408 – – 342,187 (114,113) 389,731 (114,113) 15,136 32,408 228,074 275,618 15,136 – – – – – – 32,408 2,335 (1,673) – – – – 228,074 517 1,673 2,619 (13,137) – 275,618 2,852 – 2,619 (13,137) – (10,828) (10,828) 15,136 33,070 208,918 257,124 15,136 33,070 – – 336,168 (127,250) 384,374 (127,250) 15,136 33,070 208,918 257,124 At 30 June 2012 (Restated) Cost Accumulated amortisation and impairment Net book value Year ended 30 June 2013 (Restated) Opening net book value Additions Transfers Transfers from plant & equipment Transfers to capitalised loan costs Amortisation expense Impairment expense Net foreign currency exchange differences Closing net book value At 30 June 2013 (Restated) Cost Accumulated amortisation and impairment Net book value Year ended 30 June 2014 Opening net book value Additions Transfers Transfers from plant & equipment Amortisation expense Impairment expense Net foreign currency exchange differences Closing net book value At 30 June 2014 Cost Accumulated amortisation and impairment Net book value 104 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 15. Intangible assets (continued) Impairment tests for cash-generating units containing goodwill and other intangible assets For the purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to the Group’s countries of operation which represent the lowest level within the Group at which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes as follows: Australia United States Total goodwill INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 15,136 – 2013 $’000 15,136 – 15,136 15,136 The recoverable amount of the CGU is determined based on value-in-use calculations. The calculations use cash flow projections based on financial projections approved by management covering the life of the wind farms, which is at least 25 years. This is considered appropriate as it reflects the infrastructure asset life and matches for substantial elements of the portfolios the long term nature of the contractual arrangements (being power purchase agreements and operation and maintenance contracts). Recoverable amount of the US CGU When calculating value-in-use, the Group includes cash outflows attributable to the Class A members. Due to the unique underlying structure of the US CGU, the recoverable amount of the US CGU cannot be determined without the consideration of the Class A cash flows. This approach appropriately reflects an assessment of the impairment risk associated with: ƒ the variability in the expected future benefits in the Class B interests, including the potential value shifts that occur between Class A and B members over the life of the structure associated with both the nature and the timing of the economic benefits that accrue to each class; ƒ Class A’s direct linkage in the recoverable amount of the US CGU as all members interests in the US CGU are accounted for as liabilities. The carrying value of the US CGU also includes the Institutional Equity Partnerships Class A member interests classified as liabilities including the Deferred Revenue liability (Refer Note 19). This treatment is necessary to match the future cash flows with the appropriate carrying value of the related net operating assets of the CGU. The Deferred Revenue component relates to benefits generated in the first five years of wind farm operations which are recognised in revenue over the asset’s operating life. Key assumptions for value-in-use calculations The Group makes assumptions around expected wind resources, availability, prices, operating expenses and discount rates in calculating the value-in-use of its CGUs. The Group uses production estimates to reflect the expected performance of the assets throughout the forecast period. The forecast period reflects the useful life of the assets held by each CGU as future cash flows over the forecast periods can be reliably estimated. Production is estimated by independent technical consultants on behalf of the Group for each wind farm. Pricing assumptions are based on the contractual terms of power purchase agreements where applicable, and third party assessments of merchant electricity and environmental certificate prices over the forecast period. The Australian CGU has utilised a third party assessment of merchant electricity and Large-Scale Generation Certificate (LGC) forward pricing that excludes any component for carbon pricing or an equivalent scheme but is founded on the RET as currently legislated. The RET is currently under review and, should this review result in a legislated change to the RET, a revised assessment of merchant electricity and LGC forward pricing will be carried out. This would have the potential to materially impact upon the CGU’s value-in-use. In performing value-in-use calculations for each CGU, the Group has applied post-tax discount rates to discount the forecast future attributable post-tax cash flows. The equivalent pre-tax discount rates are disclosed below. Australia United States PRE-TAX DISCOUNT RATES 2014 12.1% 11.6% 2013 11.6% 11.5% The discount rates used reflect specific risks relating to the relevant countries in which the Group has operations. For some wind farms with power purchase agreements, future revenue growth forecasts are based on the contractual escalation provisions in the relevant jurisdiction. For wind farms subject to market prices, future revenue growth forecasts are based on long term third party industry price expectations. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 105 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 15. Intangible assets (continued) Impairment expense No impairment expense or reversal of impairment has been recognised in the current year. In the prior year, an impairment expense of $58,362,000 (USD $55,000,000) was recognised in relation to the US CGU. This impairment expense was recognised against goodwill ($3,787,000), intangible assets ($35,599,000) and investments in joint ventures ($18,976,000). Sensitivity to changes in assumptions After the impairment of the US CGU in 2013, the carrying value is considered to equate to the recoverable amount as at 30 June 2014. Variations to the key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount would result in a change in the assessed recoverable amount. If the variation in assumptions had a negative impact on recoverable amount it could indicate a requirement for an additional impairment expense. The estimation of the recoverable amount of each CGU was tested for sensitivity using reasonably possible changes in key assumptions. These changes include increases and decreases in the discount rates of up to 1% with all other assumptions remaining constant. The testing for sensitivity in changes to key assumptions also included the impact of varying future cash flows for increases and decreases of up to 10% in market prices, 5% in production, and 10% in operating costs. It is estimated that changes in these assumptions would have the following approximate impact on the value-in-use (or recoverable amount) of the US CGU. The amounts below represent the range of outcomes applicable to each sensitivity. It should be noted that each of the sensitivities below assumes that the specific assumption moves in isolation. Sensitivity to assumption changes to the US CGU 1% increase/decrease in discount rate 10% decrease/increase in market prices 5% decrease/increase in production 10% increase/decrease in uncontracted operating costs USD millions +/-$50m +/-$50m +/-$55m +/-$25m In addition to the above, it is possible that the useful lives of the wind turbines and related assets may continue beyond the currently modelled 25 years. An increase in asset life to 30 years, would have the effect of increasing the recoverable amount of the US CGU by approximately $90 million. None of these tests resulted in the carrying amount of the Australian CGU exceeding its recoverable amount. 16. Trade and other payables INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP Current Trade payables and accruals Goods and services and other taxes payable Deferred income Amount due to related parties 2 Other 1 2014 $’000 15,196 4,641 5,908 – 6,674 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 17,582 4,315 6,453 – 5,480 – – – 3,511 – 3,511 – – – 2,875 – 2,875 32,419 33,830 1 Includes accrual for employee benefits and annual leave. The entire obligation for annual leave is presented as current because the Group does not have an unconditional right to defer payment. 2 Refer to Note 32 for further information relating to loans to related parties. 106 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 17. Borrowings Current Secured At amortised cost: Global Facility (i) Project finance debt – Woodlawn (ii) Bank facility – Union Bank (iii) Non-current Secured At amortised cost: Global Facility (i) Project finance debt – Woodlawn (ii) Bank facility – Union Bank (iii) Capitalised loan costs Total debt (a) Reconciliation of borrowings Opening balance Debt repayments – Global Facility Debt repayments – Woodlawn Debt repayments – Union Bank Draw down project finance debt – Woodlawn (ii) Draw down bank facility – Union Bank (iii) Net loan costs expensed /(capitalised) Net loan costs capitalised – transferred from intangible assets Net foreign currency exchange differences INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 49,779 5,018 9,187 30,082 1,082 – 63,984 31,164 929,768 44,974 48,387 (12,068) 986,351 50,780 – (9,716) 1,011,061 1,027,415 1,075,045 1,058,579 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 1,058,579 1,067,888 (35,339) (53,578) (4,046) 51,709 62,199 (2,352) – (2,127) 57,534 (1,535) – – – 1,199 (1,549) 50,110 Closing balance 1,075,045 1,058,579 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 107 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 17. Borrowings (continued) (b) Borrowings by currency The total value of funds that have been drawn down by currency, converted to Australian dollars (AUD) at the year end exchange rate, is presented in the following table: As at 30 June 2014 Australian dollars (AUD) – Global Facility Australian dollars (AUD) – Woodlawn Euro (EUR) – Global Facility US dollars (USD) – Global Facility US dollars (USD) – Union Bank Gross debt Less capitalised loan costs Total debt As at 30 June 2013 Australian dollars (AUD) – Global Facility Australian dollars (AUD) – Woodlawn Euro (EUR) – Global Facility US dollars (USD) – Global Facility Gross debt Less capitalised loan costs Total debt INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Total borrowings (Local Curr ‘000) Total borrowings (AUD ’000) 532,423 49,993 76,486 316,861 54,235 539,380 51,862 77,485 341,175 532,423 49,993 110,752 336,370 57,575 1,087,113 (12,068) 1,075,045 539,380 51,862 109,211 367,842 1,068,295 (9,716) 1,058,579 (i) Global Facility The Group’s corporate debt facility (the Global Facility) is a fully amortising, multi-currency facility that matures in 2022. The Global Facility is a syndicated facility among a group of Australian and international lenders. The Global Facility delineates between those Infigen group entities that comprise the Global Facility borrower group (Borrower Group) and those Infigen group entities that are not within the Borrower Group. The latter are generally referred to as “Excluded Companies”. In broad terms, the Borrower Group comprises IEL and substantially all of its subsidiaries, with the exception that none of the following fall within the Borrower Group: ƒ IET or IEBL; ƒ Infigen Energy Holdings Pty Limited and its subsidiaries, which primarily include the Group’s Australian development pipeline project entities, the Group’s interests in US development opportunities and the cash balances of Excluded Companies; ƒ Woodlawn Wind Pty Limited (which owns Woodlawn wind farm); ƒ The US entities that own the US Class A interests and cash flow interests acquired during the year ended 30 June 2014; and ƒ The US wind farm entities and the institutional equity partnerships which own those US wind farm entities. For clarity, the wholly-owned subsidiaries of IEL that are entitled to returns, including cash distributions, from the US wind farm entities, or institutional equity partnerships (refer Note 19), are included within the Borrower Group. Excluded Companies Excluded Companies: ƒ Are not entitled to borrow under the Global Facility; ƒ Must deal with companies within the Global Facility on arm’s length terms; and ƒ Are not subject to, or the subject of, the representations, covenants or events of default applicable to the Borrower Group. Amounts outstanding under the Global Facility The amounts outstanding under the Global Facility are in Euro, United States dollars and Australian dollars. The base currency of the Global Facility is the Euro. Principal repayments under the Global Facility Subsequent to 30 June 2010 and for the remaining term of the Global Facility (expiring December 2022), all surplus cash flows of the Borrower Group, after taking account of working capital requirements, are used to make repayments under the Global Facility on a semi-annual basis (Cash Sweep). The net disposal proceeds of any disposals by Borrower Group entities must also be applied to make repayments under the Global Facility. During the year ended 30 June 2014 repayments of $35,339,000 (2013: $57,534,000) were made. 108 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Principal repayments The borrower is required to make debt repayments on a quarterly basis following a set repayment schedule for both Tranche A & Tranche B loans. During the year ended 30 June 2014 net repayments of $1,869,049 (2013: $1,534,700 under the previous Woodlawn Wind Pty Limited facility) were made. Interest payments Interest is payable on a quarterly basis. Tranche A interest is calculated on the BBSY (Australian dollar) plus a margin and the Tranche B interest is fixed for 10 years at 3.7575% plus a margin. Interest obligations for the Tranche A loan have been hedged with an existing interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 4.48% until September 2014 and then hedged with 80% interest caps, capped at 3.979% (September 2014 to September 2018) and 5.785% (September 2018 to March 2023). Security The lenders under the Project Finance facility hold security over the shares in, and assets and undertaking of, WWCS Finance Pty Ltd and Woodlawn Wind Pty Ltd. (iii) Bank facility – Union Bank To fund the acquisition of US Class A interests and cash flow interests, the Group entered into a debt facility with Union Bank N.A. (“Union Bank”), a US bank. The facility amount was US$58 million with maturity in May 2024. Interest payments Interest is payable semi-annually in May and November based on LIBOR (United States dollar), plus a margin. The interest obligations are hedged through an interest rate swap with a maturity in May 2024. At inception the debt was 93% hedged at 1.991% plus a margin. Security The security provided to Union Bank is limited to the cash flows acquired as a result of the transaction. Further information about the investment is included in Note 13, ‘Fair value measurement of financial instruments’. 17. Borrowings (continued) Interest payments The Group pays interest each six months based on Euribor (Euro drawings), BBSY (Australian dollar) or LIBOR (United States dollar), plus a margin. It is the Group’s policy and a requirement of the Global Facility to use financial instruments to fix the interest rate for a portion of the borrowings (refer Note 35). Financial covenant During the period of the Cash Sweep, the only financial covenant that applies under the Global Facility is a leverage ratio covenant. This covenant is based on the results of each twelve month period ending 30 June or 31 December and is as follows: ƒ Through to June 2016: not more than 8.5 times; ƒ July 2016 to June 2019: not more than 6.0 times; ƒ July 2019 to expiry of facility (December 2022): not more than 3.0 times. The leverage ratio is determined by taking the quotient of Net Debt and EBITDA of entities that are within the Borrower Group. EBITDA represents the consolidated earnings of the Borrower Group entities before finance charges, unrealised gains or losses on financial instruments and material items of an unusual or non-recurring nature. The calculation of EBITDA from US wind farm operations is specifically defined under the Global Facility as Class B cash distributions to Infigen for leverage ratio purposes. Distributions to Infigen from the US wind farm entities can vary materially from the US reported EBITDA as a result of Institutional Equity Partnerships (Refer to Note 19). Review events A review event would occur if the shares of IEL were removed from the official list of the Australian Securities Exchange or were unstapled from units of IET and shares of IEBL. Such an event would require assessment of the effect on the Global Facility and, if necessary, agreement of an action plan. Security The Global Facility has no asset level security, however, each borrower under the Global Facility is a guarantor of the facilities. In addition, lenders have first ranking security over the issued share capital of, or other ownership interest in: ƒ The borrowers (other than Infigen Energy Limited); and ƒ The direct subsidiaries of the borrowers, which are holding entities of each operating wind farm in Infigen’s portfolio (other than Woodlawn wind farm). Global Facility lenders have no security over Excluded Companies. (ii) Project Finance Facility – WWCS Finance Pty Ltd (Woodlawn wind farm) WWCS Finance Pty Ltd, the immediate parent company of Woodlawn Wind Pty Ltd (which in turn owns Woodlawn wind farm), is the borrower under an AUD $51.7 million syndicated term facility. The syndicate lenders are Westpac Banking Corporation (Tranche A) and Clean Energy Finance Corporation (Tranche B). The Tranche A & Tranche B loans are of equal amounts, with maturity in September 2018 and September 2023 respectively. Notes to the coNsolidated fiNaNcial statemeNts | 109 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 18. Provisions Current Employee benefits 1 Non-current Employee benefits 1 Decommission and restoration 2 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2,900 2,900 491 18,591 19,082 21,982 2013 $’000 2,795 2,795 451 18,518 18,969 21,764 1 The current provision for employee benefits represents provision for short term incentives and long service leave. For long service leave it covers all unconditional entitlements where employees have completed the required period of service and also those where employees are entitled to pro-rata payments in certain circumstances. 2 The decommission and restoration provision represents estimates of future expenditure relating to dismantling and removing of wind turbines and associated plant, and restoration of wind farm site. A reconciliation of the carrying amounts of provisions is set out below: INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Year ended 30 June 2013 (Restated) Carrying amount at the start of the year Provision reversed the year Provision recognised due to change in discount rates Recognition and unwinding of discount Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates Decommissioning and restoration $’000 Employee benefits $’000 6,424 – 9,242 1,816 1,036 3,803 (557) – – – Total $’000 10,227 (557) 9,242 1,816 1,036 Carrying amount at the end of the year 18,518 3,246 21,764 Year ended 30 June 2014 Carrying amount at the start of the year Additional provision during the year Recognition and unwinding of discount Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates Carrying amount at the end of the year 18,518 – 242 (169) 3,246 145 – – 21,764 145 242 (169) 18,591 3,391 21,982 19. Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities Nature of institutional equity partnerships Infigen is a Class B member in twelve (12) US limited liability companies (LLCs) that directly or indirectly own the US wind farms. The Group owns between 50% and 100% of the Class B membership interests in these LLCs. Each of these LLCs also has one or more Class A members (institutional investors), and where the Group does not own 100% of the Class B interests, one or more other Class B members. These LLCs are referred to as institutional equity partnerships (IEPs). The Group’s relationship with the Class A institutional investors and other Class B members is established through a LLC operating agreement. That operating agreement contains rules by which the cash flows and tax benefits, including Production Tax Credits (PTCs) and accelerated depreciation, generated by the wind farms are allocated between the Class A and Class B members during the life of the wind farms. The Class A institutional investors purchase their partnership interests for an upfront cash payment. This payment is fixed so that the investors, from the date that they purchase their interest, anticipate earning an agreed targeted internal rate of return by the end of the ten-year period over which PTCs are generated. This anticipated return is computed based on the total anticipated benefit that the institutional investors will receive and includes the value of PTCs, allocated taxable income or loss and cash distributions. 110 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 19. Institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities (continued) Pursuant to the allocation rules specified in the LLC operating agreement, all operating cash flow is allocated to the Class B members until the earlier of a fixed date, or when the Class B members recover the amount of invested Class B capital. This is expected to occur between five to ten years from the initial closing date. Thereafter, all operating cash flow is allocated to the Class A institutional investors until they receive the targeted internal rate of return (the ‘Reallocation Date’). Prior to the Reallocation Date, a significant part of the tax income and benefits generated by the partnerships are allocated to the Class A institutional investors, with any remaining benefits allocated to the Class B members. After the Reallocation Date, the Class A institutional investors retain a non-controlling interest for the duration of their membership in the LLC. The Group also has an option to purchase the Class A institutional investors’ residual interests at fair market value. Recognition of institutional equity partnerships The Group either controls or jointly controls the strategic and operating decisions of institutional equity partnerships. Notes 29 and 36 provide further details of controlled and jointly controlled partnerships. Classification of institutional equity partnerships Class A institutional investors’ and Class B members’ investments in institutional equity partnership structures are classified as liabilities in the financial statements of the Group as the partnerships have limited lives and the allocation of income earned is governed by contractual agreements over the life of the investment. The following should be noted: ƒ Should future operational revenues from the US wind farms be insufficient, there is no contractual obligation on the Group to repay the liabilities. ƒ Balances outstanding (Class A institutional investors and Class B non-controlling members) do not impact the Group’s lending covenants. ƒ There is no exit mechanism by which investors can require repayment of their remaining capital and consequently there is no re-financing risk for each of the LLCs. The following table includes the components of institutional equity partnerships classified as liabilities: Class A member liabilities; non-controlling interests relating to Class B members and deferred revenue. Components of institutional equity partnerships: At 1 July Distributions/financing Value of production tax credits offset against Class A liability Value of tax expenses allocated against Class A liability Allocation of return on outstanding Class A liability Movement in residual interest (Class A) Non-controlling interest (Class B) Class A members Class B members 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 2014 $’000 Total 2013 $’000 (Restated) INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 450,306 (42,266) 399,378 (8,406) 51,919 (1,742) 52,063 (8,244) 502,225 (44,008) 451,441 (16,650) (56,253) (50,159) 14,653 4,495 26,332 (3,467) – 25,441 15,321 – – – – – – – – – 6,074 (924) 3,044 5,056 (56,253) (50,159) 14,653 4,495 26,332 (3,467) 6,074 (6,182) 25,441 15,321 3,044 69,292 Foreign exchange loss/(gain) (5,258) 64,236 At 30 June Deferred revenue: At 1 July Tax benefits recognised/(deferred) during the period Foreign exchange loss/(gain) At 30 June 384,047 450,306 55,327 51,919 439,374 502,225 356,817 314,523 (18,544) (5,022) (6,294) 48,588 333,251 356,817 772,625 859,042 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 111 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 20. Contributed equity INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 No. ’000 2014 $’000 2013 No. ’000 2013 $’000 2014 No. ’000 2014 $’000 2013 No. ’000 2013 $’000 Fully paid stapled securities/units Opening balance Issue of securities (2,727,462 units at 30 cents each) 762,266 761,642 762,266 761,642 762,266 753,076 762,266 753,076 2,727 818 – – 2,727 818 – – Closing balance 764,993 762,460 762,266 761,642 764,993 753,894 762,266 753,076 Attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Equity holders of the other stapled securities (non-controlling interests) INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 2,305 760,155 2,305 759,337 762,460 761,642 Stapled securities entitle the holder to participate in dividends from IEL and IEBL and in distributions from IET. The holder is entitled to participate in the proceeds on winding up of the stapled entities in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the securities held. 21. Reserves Foreign currency translation Hedging Acquisition Share-based payment Attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Equity holders of the other stapled securities (non-controlling interests) (a) Foreign currency translation reserve Balance at beginning of financial year Movements increasing/(decreasing) recognised: Translation of foreign operations Balance at end of financial year INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 (45,867) (102,301) (47,675) 3,622 2013 $’000 (39,610) (124,656) (47,675) 3,592 (192,221) (208,349) (192,221) (208,349) – – (192,221) (208,349) INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (39,610) (50,472) (6,257) 10,862 (45,867) (39,610) Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign controlled entities are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve, as described in Note 1(n). The reserve is recognised in profit and loss when the net investment is disposed of. 112 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 21. Reserves (continued) (b) Hedging reserve Balance at beginning of financial year Movement increasing/(decreasing) recognised: Interest rate swaps Deferred tax arising on hedges Balance at end of financial year INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (124,656) (151,064) 21,213 1,142 22,355 32,165 (5,757) 26,408 (102,301) (124,656) The hedging reserve is used to record movements on a hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge that are recognised directly in equity, as described in Note 1(k). Amounts are recognised in profit and loss when the associated hedged transaction settles. (c) Acquisition reserve Balance at the beginning and end of the financial year INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (47,675) (47,675) The acquisition reserve relates to the acquisition of non-controlling interests in entities over which Infigen Energy already exerted control. Therefore, the acquisition of these non-controlling interests did not result in a change of control but was an acquisition of the minority shareholders. These transactions are treated as transactions between owners of the Group. The difference between the purchase consideration and the amount, by which the non-controlling interest is adjusted, has been recognised in the acquisition reserve. (d) Share-based payment reserve Balance at beginning of financial year Share-based payments expense 1 Balance at end of financial year INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 3,592 30 3,622 2013 $’000 2,705 887 3,592 1 The share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of performance rights/units issued to employees but not exercised. Refer Note 25 for further detail. 22. Retained earnings Balance at beginning of financial year Net loss attributable to stapled securityholders INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 (69,278) (8,903) 2013 $’000 10,697 (79,975) 2014 $’000 (13,748) (646) 2013 $’000 (13,102) (646) Balance at end of financial year (78,181) (69,278) (14,394) (13,748) Attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Equity holders of the other stapled securities (non-controlling interests) (55,672) (22,509) (47,495) (21,783) (14,394) (13,748) – – (78,181) (69,278) (14,394) (13,748) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 113 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 23. Earnings per security/unit (a) Basic and diluted earnings per stapled security/parent entity share: Parent entity share From continuing operations From discontinued operations Total basic and diluted earnings per share1 Stapled security From continuing operations From discontinued operations Total basic and diluted earnings per security 1 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 Cents per security 2013 Cents per security 2014 Cents per unit 2013 Cents per unit (1.1) – (1.1) (1.2) – (1.2) (10.4) – (10.4) (10.5) – (10.5) – – – (0.1) – (0.1) – – – (0.1) – (0.1) 1 The number of performance rights/units outstanding have not been included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they are anti-dilutive. Refer to Note 25 for the number of performance rights/units outstanding. (b) Reconciliation of earnings used in calculating earnings per security/unit The earnings and weighted average number of securities/unit used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per security/unit are as follows: INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 Earnings attributable to the parent entity securityholders From continuing operations (8,177) (79,320) Total earnings attributable to the parent entity shareholders (8,177) (79,320) Earnings attributable to the stapled security holders From continuing operations (8,903) (79,320) Total earnings attributable to the stapled security holders (8,903) (79,320) – – (646) (646) – – (646) (646) (c) Weighted average number of securities used as the denominator Weighted average number of securities/units for the purposes of basic earnings per security/unit Weighted average number of securities/units for the purposes of diluted earnings per security/unit INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 No.’000 2013 No.’000 2014 No.’000 2013 No.’000 764,560 762,266 762,699 762,266 767,287 762,266 762,699 762,266 114 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 24. Distributions Infigen Energy Group Ordinary securities On 14 June 2011, Infigen advised that no final distribution would be paid for the year ended 30 June 2011 and distributions would be suspended for the years ended 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2013. That initiative aimed to maximise the capital available to Infigen to repay debt and fund future opportunities. As advised at subsequent Infigen AGMs, the sweeping of surplus cash flows from operating assets held within the Global Facility borrower group to repay debt, effectively serves to continue to preclude the payment of distributions to securityholders. Final and interim distributions in respect of the 2013 and 2014 years were nil cents per stapled security. Franking credits The parent entity has franking credits of $6,228,093 for the year ended 30 June 2014 (2013: $6,228,093). Infigen Energy Trust Group Distributions in respect of year ended 30 June 2014 were nil (30 June 2013: nil). 25. Share-based payments Long Term Incentive (LTI) – Employee equity plan LTI Equity Plan arrangements Senior Managers have received long-term incentive grants under the Infigen Energy Equity Plan (“Equity plan”) for FY12, FY13 and FY14. Performance conditions of awards granted under the LTI Equity Plan ƒ In FY12 plan participants received 100% performance rights in two tranches of equal value (Tranche 1 and Tranche 2). The Tranche 1 TSR performance condition was not met at 30 June 2014 and will be re-assessed at 30 June 2015. The Tranche 2 Operational performance condition of FY12 LTI Grant passed the performance test on 30 June 2014 resulting in 51.2% of Tranche 2 Performance Rights vesting when the first trading window opens after 1 July 2014. A total of 667,673 securities are expected to be issued by the company in the relevant trading window. ƒ In FY13 plan participants received 100% performance rights in two tranches of equal value (Tranche 1 and Tranche 2). ƒ In FY14 plan participants received 100% performance rights or units in two tranches of equal value (Tranche 1 and Tranche 2). The measures used to determine performance and the subsequent vesting of performance rights/units are, Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and a financial performance (EBITDA) test. The vesting of Tranche 1 of the performance rights/units is subject to the TSR condition, while Tranche 2 of the performance rights/units are subject to the Operational Performance condition. The Operational Performance condition is determined by an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) test. Performance rights Performance units Period 2012 Tranche 1 TSR condition TSR condition 30 September 2011 – 30 June 2015 Tranche 2 Operational performance condition Operational performance condition 30 September 2011 – 30 June 2014 2013 Tranche 1 TSR condition TSR condition 1 July 2012 – 30 June 2015 Tranche 2 Operational performance condition Operational performance condition 1 July 2012 – 30 June 2015 2014 Tranche 1 TSR condition TSR condition 1 July 2013 – 30 June 2016 Tranche 2 Operational performance condition Operational performance condition 1 July 2013 – 30 June 2016 TSR condition (applicable to Tranche 1 performance rights or units): TSR measures the growth in the price of securities plus cash distributions notionally reinvested in securities. In order for the Tranche 1 performance rights to vest, the TSR of Infigen will be compared to companies in the S&P/ASX 200 (excluding financial services and the materials/resources sectors). For the purpose of calculating the TSR measurement, the security prices of each company in the S&P/ASX 200 (as modified above) and of Infigen will be averaged over the 30 trading days preceding the start and end date of the performance period. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 115 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 25. Share-based payments (continued) The percentage of the Tranche 1 performance rights that vest under the LTI plans are as follows: Infigen Energy’s TSR performance compared to the relevant peer group FY12, 13 & 14 Grant Percentage of Tranche 1 Performance Rights that vest 0 to 49th percentile 50th percentile 51st to 75th percentile 76th to 95th percentile 96th to 100th percentile Nil 25% of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest 27%–75% (i.e. for every percentile increase between 51% and 75% an additional 2% of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest) 76.25%–100% (i.e. for every percentile increase between 76% and 95% an additional 1.25% of the Tranche 1 Performance Rights will vest) 100% Operational Performance condition (applicable to Tranche 2 performance rights/units): the vesting of the Tranche 2 performance rights or units is subject to an Operational Performance condition. The Operational Performance condition will test the multiple of EBITDA to Capital Base, with the annual target being a specified percentage increase in the multiple over the year. The Capital Base will be measured as equity (net assets) plus net debt. Both the EBITDA and Capital Base will be measured on a proportionately consolidated basis to reflect Infigen’s economic interest in all investments. The percentage of the Tranche 2 performance rights that vest under the LTI plans are as follows: Infigen Energy's EBITDA performance % < 90% 90% ≤ 110% of the cumulative target FY12, 13 & 14 Grant percentage of Tranche 2 Performance Rights that vest Nil 5% to 100% (i.e. for every 1% increase between 90 and 110% of target an additional 5% of the Tranche 2 Performance Rights will vest). Set out below are summaries of performance rights that have been granted under the LTI plan: Deemed grant date 30 Sept 2010 (FY11 LTI Grant) 22 Dec 2011 (FY12 LTI Grant) 15 Nov 2012 (FY12 Deferred STI Grant) 15 Nov 2012 (FY13 LTI Grant) 2 Dec 2013 (FY13 Deferred STI Grant) 2 Dec 2013 (FY14 LTI Grant) Balance at start of the year Number 1,544,990 2,608,098 3,786,020 5,610,531 Granted during the year Number Vested during the year Number Cash settled during the year Number Lapsed during the year Number Balance at end of the year Number – – – – – – – – 1,544,990 2,608,098 2,727,462 1,058,558 – – – – – – – – – – – – – 5,610,531 2,713,582 4,108,715 – – 2,713,582 4,108,715 Total 13,549,639 6,822,297 2,727,462 1,058,558 4,153,088 12,432,828 29 June 2011 (FY11 USA LTI Grant) Total Grand total 126,866 126,866 – – – – – – 126,866 126,866 – – 13,676,505 6,822,297 2,727,462 1,058,558 4,279,954 12,432,828 Fair value of performance rights granted under the LTI plan 2012 2013 2014 Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 1 Tranche 2 116 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Grant date 22-Dec-11 22-Dec-11 15-Nov-12 15-Nov-12 2-Dec-13 2-Dec-13 Fair value of performance rights per share ($) 0.091 0.255 0.078 0.220 0.098 0.275 25. Share-based payments (continued) The fair values of performance rights/units at grant date are determined using market prices and a model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the performance right/unit and the security price at grant date. The model inputs for performance rights/units granted include: ƒ Performance rights/units are granted for no consideration and vest in accordance with the TSR condition and the Operational Performance condition outlined above for Tranche 1 and Tranche 2, respectively. Performance rights/units have a nil exercise price and vest automatically as stapled securities for rights and as cash for units. ƒ Grant dates: 22 December 2011 (FY12 plan); 15 November 2012 (FY13 plan); 2 December 2013 (FY14 plan) ƒ Security price at grant date: $0.255 (FY12 plan), $0.22 (FY13 plan), $0.275 (FY14 plan) Where performance units are issued to employees of subsidiaries within the Group, the expense in relation to these performance rights, is recognised by the relevant entity with the corresponding increase in stapled securities. Deferred short term incentive granted as performance rights (Deferred STI) In FY12 & FY13 Senior Management received at least 50% of their short term incentive allocation as performance rights, deferred for twelve months ƒ The deferred STI has a forfeiture condition relating to continued employment ƒ The deferred STI is recognised as a Share Based Payment expense over the two financial periods ƒ 2,727,462 securities were issued to satisfy the FY12 deferred STI obligation that vested on 27 August 2013 with the balance cash settled ƒ The grant date for the FY13 deferred STI was November 2013 ƒ The number of units issued under the FY 13 Deferred STI was 2,713,582 ƒ The security price at grant date for the Deferred STI was $0.275 ƒ The expense recognised in FY14 relating to the FY12 & FY13 Deferred STI was $768,481 Expenses arising from share based payment transactions Total expenses arising from share based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of employee benefit expense were as follows: LTI Performance rights expense in the current year Deferred STI expense in the current year (deferred in performance rights) Write-back prior years long-term share-based incentive expense allocation 26. Commitments for expenditure (a) Capital expenditure commitments Capital expenditure commitments INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 596 117 (471) 242 2013 $’000 860 623 (655) 828 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 1,048 2013 $’000 524 Capital expenditure commitments in the year ended 30 June 2014 related to capital spare parts and solar energy projects. Capital expenditure commitments in year ended 30 June 2013 include commitment arrangements relating to IT projects and solar energy projects. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 117 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 26. Commitments for expenditure (continued) (b) Lease commitments Non-cancellable operating lease commitments are disclosed in Note 28 to the financial statements. (c) Other expenditure commitments Repairs and maintenance INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 287,560 284,780 Other expenditure commitments relate to contractual obligations for future repairs and maintenance of the wind plant and equipment which have not been recognised as a liability. 27. Contingent liabilities Contingent liabilities Letters of credit INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 20,613 38,826 Letters of credit generally relate to wind farm construction, operations and decommissioning and represent the maximum exposure. No liability was recognised by the parent entity of the Group in relation to these letters of credit, as their combined fair value is immaterial. Deed of Cross Guarantee Under the terms of ASIC Class Order 98/1418 (as amended by Class Order 98/2017) certain wholly-owned controlled entities are granted relief from the requirement to prepare audited financial reports. Infigen Energy Limited has entered into an approved deed of indemnity for the cross-guarantee of liabilities with those controlled entities (refer to Note 30). Acquisition of Class A Interests in US wind farms During the period the Group acquired a share of various Class A interests in Group-related US wind farms. The acquisitions resulted in a put option being held by the seller, whereby Infigen may be required to acquire the residual interests held by the seller after December 2018. The exercise of this option is at the discretion of the seller and is only likely to be exercised if certain performance outcomes are achieved. At this point in time, it cannot be determined whether it is probable that the option will be exercised. The maximum exposure to the Group under the option is capped at US$3.5 million (AUD$3.9 million). As such, no liability has been recognised for the option as at 30 June 2014. Infigen Energy Trust Group There are no contingent liabilities for the IET Group as at 30 June 2014 (2013: nil). 28. Leases Operating leases The Group leases land for its wind farms under non-cancellable operating leases expiring within 20 to 55 years. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. Commitments for minimum lease payments in relation to non-cancellable operating leases are payable as follows: Not later than 1 year Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years Later than 5 years INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 7,418 28,634 96,762 7,579 29,181 103,879 132,814 140,639 118 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 29. Subsidiaries Name of entity Parent entity Infigen Energy Limited Other stapled entities Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited Infigen Energy Trust Subsidiaries of the parent and other stapled entities Allegheny Ridge Wind Farm LLC Aragonne Solar LLC Aragonne Wind LLC Aragonne Wind Investments LLC Bodangora Wind Farm Pty Ltd Blue Canyon 1 Member LLC Buena Vista Energy LLC Capital East Solar Pty Limited Capital Solar Farm Pty Limited Capital Wind Farm 2 Pty Limited * * * * * *# Capital Wind Farm Holdings Pty Limited * Capital Wind Farm (BB) Trust Caprock Wind LLC Caprock Wind Investments LLC Caprock Wind Member LLC CCWE Holdings LLC Cedar Creek Wind Energy LLC Cedar Creek Wind 1 Member LLC Cherry Tree Wind Farm Pty Ltd Combine Hills 1 Member LLC CREP Land Holdings Pty Limited Crescent Ridge Holdings LLC Crescent Ridge LLC CS CWF Trust CS Walkaway Trust Flyers Creek Wind Farm Pty Ltd Forsayth Wind Farm Pty Limited Georgia Sun LLC GSG LLC IFN Crescent Ridge LLC Infigen Energy Management Holdings LLC Infigen Energy Europe Pty Limited Infigen Energy Europe 2 Pty Limited Infigen Energy Europe 3 Pty Limited Infigen Energy Europe 4 Pty Limited Infigen Energy Europe 5 Pty Limited Infigen Energy Germany Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy Germany Holdings 2 Pty Limited Infigen Energy Germany Holdings 3 Pty Limited * * * * * * * * * * * * * OWNERSHIP INTEREST Country of incorporation 2014 % 2013 % Australia Bermuda Australia USA USA USA USA Australia USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia USA USA USA USA USA USA Australia USA Australia USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia USA USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia – – – 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 100% 100% 67% 1 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 1 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% – – – 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 100% 100% 67% 1 67% 100% 100% 100% – 75% 1 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ^ Infigen Energy Verwaltungs GmbH Infigen Energy Holdings Sarl Germany Luxembourg NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 119 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 29. Subsidiaries (continued) Name of entity Infigen Energy US JD LLC Infigen Energy US JE LLC * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Infigen Energy US Holdings LLC Infigen Energy US LLC Infigen Energy T Services Pty Limited Infigen Energy Custodian Services Pty Limited Infigen Energy Development Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy Development Pty Ltd Infigen Energy Services Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy Services Pty Limited Infigen Energy RE Limited Infigen Energy Investments Pty Limited Infigen Energy Markets Pty Limited Infigen Energy US Partnership Infigen Energy US Corporation Infigen Energy US Development Holdings LLC Infigen Energy (US) Pty Limited Infigen Energy (US) 2 Pty Limited Infigen Energy Finance (Australia) Pty Limited Infigen Energy Finance (Germany) Pty Limited Infigen Energy Finance (Lux) Sarl Infigen Energy (Malta) Limited Infigen Energy Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy Niederrhein Pty Limited Infigen Suntech Australia Pty Limited Infigen Asset Management LLC Infigen Management Services LLC Kumeyaay Holdings LLC Kumeyaay Wind LLC Kumeyaay Wind Member LLC * * * *# * Lake Bonney Wind Power Pty Limited Lake Bonney Wind Power 2 Pty Limited Lake Bonney Wind Power 3 Pty Limited Lake Bonney Holdings Pty Limited Lake Bonney 2 Holdings Pty Limited * Manildra Solar Farm Pty Limited Mendota Hills LLC * NPP LB2 LLC * NPP Projects I LLC * NPP Projects V LLC * NPP Walkaway Pty Limited * NPP Walkaway Trust * Renewable Energy Constructions Pty Limited *# Renewable Power Ventures Pty Ltd * RPV Investment Trust 120 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 OWNERSHIP INTEREST Country of incorporation 2014 % 2013 % USA USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Luxembourg Malta Australia Australia Australia USA USA USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia USA USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% – – – 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% – 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 1 100% 1 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 29. Subsidiaries (continued) Name of entity Sweetwater 1 Member LLC Sweetwater 2 Member LLC Sweetwater 3 Member LLC Sweetwater 4-5 Member LLC *# Walkaway Wind Power Pty Limited * Walkaway (BB) Pty Limited Walkaway (BB) Trust * Walkaway (CS) Pty Limited * Woakwine Wind Farm Pty Ltd Wind Park Jersey Member LLC Wind Portfolio I Member LLC Wind Portfolio Holdings I LLC * Woodlawn Wind Pty Ltd * WWCS Holdings Pty Limited * WWCS Finance Pty Limited *# WWP Holdings Pty Limited BBWP Holdings (Bermuda) Limited * Infigen Energy US Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy US Development LLC Infigen Energy Solar One LLC Rio Bravo Solar I LLC Limestone Solar I LLC Mesquite Solar I LLC Rio Bravo Solar II LLC Wildwood Solar II LLC Tortolita Solar I LLC Mexia Solar I LLC Sandy Hills Solar I LLC Mustang Solar I LLC Subsidiaries of the Trust Walkaway (BB) Trust CS Walkaway Trust RPV Investment Trust OWNERSHIP INTEREST Country of incorporation 2014 % 2013 % USA USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia Australia Bermuda Australia USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA Australia Australia Australia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 100% 1 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 100% 68% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 100% 68% * Denotes a member of the IEL tax consolidated group. 1 Class B Member interest. 2 Equity member interest. # Entered into a class order 98/1418 and related deed of cross guarantee with Infigen Energy Limited removing the requirement for the preparation of separate financial statements where preparation of a separate financial statement is required (refer Note 30). ^ Placed into voluntary liquidation during 2013. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 121 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 30. Deed of cross guarantee Set out below is a consolidated statements of comprehensive income and balance sheet, comprising Infigen Energy Limited and its controlled entities which are parties to the Deed of Cross Guarantee (refer Note 29), after eliminating all transactions between parties to the Deed. The Deed of Cross Guarantee was executed on 18 June 2012. Consolidated statements of comprehensive income Revenue from continuing operations Other income Operating expenses Depreciation and amortisation expense Interest expense Other finance costs Net profit/(loss) before income tax Income tax expense Net profit/(loss) after income tax Loss from discontinued operations Net profit/(loss) for the year Other comprehensive income Items that may be reclassified to profit and loss Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of tax INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 80,760 6,095 (12,781) (21,214) (22,052) – 30,808 (3,438) 27,370 (5,030) 2013 $’000 75,991 – (12,462) (20,574) (23,850) (24,158) (5,053) (2,823) (7,876) – 22,340 (7,876) – 22,340 2,402 (5,474) 122 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 30. Deed of cross guarantee (continued) (a) Consolidated balance sheets Current assets Trade and other receivables Inventory Total current assets Non-current assets Receivables Shares in controlled entities Property, plant and equipment Deferred tax assets Intangible assets Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Payables Provisions Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Contributed equity Reserves Retained earnings Total equity INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 16,860 2,838 19,698 835,874 28,559 395,098 51,486 63,876 15,875 3,008 18,883 785,039 33,589 415,508 51,298 64,090 1,374,893 1,349,524 1,394,591 1,368,407 8,115 8,115 7,447 7,447 1,352,349 1,349,230 3,819 3,762 1,356,168 1,352,992 1,364,283 1,360,439 30,308 7,968 2,305 (23,005) 51,008 30,308 2,305 (23,005) 28,668 7,968 31. Acquisition of businesses There were no businesses acquired by the Group during the years ended 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 123 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 32. Related party disclosures (a) Equity interests in related parties Details of the percentage ownership held in subsidiaries are disclosed in Note 29 to the financial statements. (b) Key management personnel disclosures Details of key management personnel remuneration are disclosed in Note 7 to the financial statements. (c) Other related party transactions Related party balances Infigen Energy Group At the year end the Group was owed an amount of $804,000 (2013: $764,000) from an associate, RPV Developments Pty Ltd. Infigen Energy Trust Group Receivables from related parties are disclosed in Note 9. Payables to related parties are disclosed in Note 16. During the year ended 30 June 2014, the Trust charged no interest (2013: nil) on certain loans receivable from the Parent. Under the Trust’s constitution, the Responsible Entity (“RE”) is entitled to a management fee of 2% per annum of the value of the gross assets of the Trust. The RE, Infigen Energy RE Limited, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent. The RE had previously exercised its right under the constitution to waive the fee referred to above such that it is paid a fixed fee that is increased by CPI annually. During the year ended 30 June 2014, the Trust incurred RE fees of $636,099 (2013: $620,584) from the RE. As at 30 June 2014, the Trust owed the following amounts to other members of the Infigen group: Infigen Energy RE Limited 2014 $’000 3,511 As at 30 June 2014, the Infigen Energy Trust Group was owed the following amounts by other members of the Infigen group: 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 2,875 2013 $’000 Infigen Energy Limited Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited Capital Wind Farm Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy Holdings Pty Limited Infigen Energy (US) 2 Pty Limited Total receivables from related parties 593,169 592,371 691 12,960 105,790 30,009 691 12,960 105,789 30,009 742,619 741,820 (d) Parent entities The parent entity in the Group is IEL. The ultimate Australian parent entity is IEL. The ultimate parent entity is IEL. 33. Subsequent events Since the end of the financial year, in the opinion of the directors of IEL and IET, there have not been any transactions or event of a material or unusual nature likely to affect significantly the operations or affairs of IEL and IET in future financial periods. 34. Notes to the cash flow statements (a) Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents For the purposes of the cash flow statements cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand and in banks, net of outstanding bank overdrafts. Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year as shown in the cash flow statement is reconciled to the related items in the balance sheet as follows: Cash and cash equivalents INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 (Restated) 80,699 121,213 2014 $’000 392 2013 $’000 383 (b) Restricted cash balances As at 30 June 2014 $12,682,000 (2013: $17,264,000) of cash is held by Infigen Energy Group in escrow in relation to payments retained by the Group under turbine supply and wind farm construction contracts, as well as the decommissioning of certain sites. 124 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 35. Financial risk management The Group and the Trust is exposed to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk and electricity price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The principal financial instruments of the Group that give rise to these risks comprise cash, receivables, payables and interest bearing debt. The principal financial instruments of the Trust that give risk to these risks comprise of cash and receivables. Risk management is carried out by the Group’s or the Trust’s corporate treasury function under policies approved by the Board. The Group’s or the Trust’s treasury department identifies, evaluates and hedges certain financial risks in close co-operation with the Group’s or the Trust’s operating units. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as policies covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and non-derivative financial instruments, and investment of excess liquidity. The Group’s or the Trust’s treasury policy provides a framework for managing the financial risks of the Group or the Trust. The key philosophy of the Group’s or the Trust’s treasury policy is risk mitigation. The Group’s or the Trust’s treasury policy specifically does not authorise any form of speculation. The Group's or the Trust’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to manage potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group or the Trust. In line with the Group’s or the Trust’s treasury policy, derivatives are exclusively used for risk management purposes or hedging purposes, not as trading or other speculative instruments. The Group uses different methods to measure different types of risk to which it is exposed. These methods include sensitivity analysis in the case of interest rate, foreign exchange and other price risks and ageing analysis for credit risk. There have been no changes to the type or class of financial risks the Group is exposed to since prior year. Market risks Interest rate risks The Group’s income and operating cash flows are exposed to interest rate risk as it borrows funds at floating interest rates. The risk is managed by fixing a portion of the floating rate borrowings, by use of interest rate derivatives. During 2014 and 2013, the Group’s borrowings at variable rates were denominated in Australian Dollars, US Dollars and Euros. A high percentage of the face value of debt in each of the relevant currencies is hedged using interest rate derivatives. The table below shows a breakdown of the Group’s interest rate debt and interest rate derivative positions. In undertaking this strategy the Group is willing to forgo a percentage of the potential economic benefit that would arise in a falling interest rate environment, in order to partially protect against downside risks of increasing interest rates and to secure a greater level of predictability for cash flows. Under interest rate derivative contracts, the Group agrees to exchange the difference between fixed and floating rate interest amounts calculated on agreed notional principal amounts. The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on market values of equivalent instruments at the reporting date and are disclosed below. The average interest rate is based on the outstanding balances at the start of the financial year. The Trust has a small amount of cash balances. Interest earnings on these cash balances are affected when interest rates move. The following tables detail the notional principal amounts and remaining terms of interest rate derivative contracts for the Group outstanding as at reporting date: Outstanding pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swaps Fixed swap – AUD – GF Fixed swap – AUD – Woodlawn Fixed swap – Euro – GF Fixed swap – US dollar – GF Fixed swap – US dollar – UBOC Average contracted fixed interest rate Notional principal amount Fair value 2014 % 6.74 4.48 4.93 5.30 1.99 2013 % 6.76 4.48 4.93 5.29 – 2014 $’000 456,328 21,954 72,401 237,275 53,544 2013 $’000 488,732 41,551 112,755 316,165 – 2014 $’000 (69,773) (100) (21,393) (40,132) (745) 2013 $’000 (83,281) (913) (20,486) (50,027) – 841,502 959,203 (132,143) (154,707) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 125 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 35. Financial risk management (continued) Bank debt as at balance date The table below details the total amount of debt and breakdown of fixed and floating debt the Group held at 30 June 2014. The Global Facility debt is denominated in AUD, USD and EUR and the debt is re-priced every 6 months. ƒ AUD debt is priced using the 6 month BBSW rate plus the defined facility margin. ƒ EUR debt is priced using the 6 month Euribor rate plus the defined facility margin. ƒ USD debt is priced using the 6 month Libor rate plus the defined facility margin. The Woodlawn Project finance debt is re-priced quarterly using the 3 month BBSY (AUD) rate plus the defined facility margin. The current floating rate debt detailed in the table below is not inclusive of the facility margin. The current average interest rate, pre-margin across all facilities, is 5.87% (2013: 5.97%) The current average margin across all facilities is 134 basis points (2013: 114 basis points). Floating rate debt AUD debt – GF AUD debt – Woodlawn EUR debt – GF USD debt – GF USD debt – UBOC Facility Fixed rate debt AUD debt – GF AUD debt – Woodlawn EUR debt – GF USD debt – GF USD debt – UBOC Facility Floating debt Debt principal amount 2014 % 2.72 2.73 0.31 0.33 0.23 2013 % 2.89 2.82 0.34 0.42 – 2014 $’000 76,095 3,042 38,352 99,095 4,030 2013 $’000 50,647 10,311 (3,545) 53,143 – 220,614 110,556 Fixed debt Debt principal amount % of debt hedged 2014 % 6.74 4.09 4.93 5.30 1.99 2013 % 6.76 4.48 4.93 5.29 – 2014 $’000 456,328 46,951 72,401 237,275 53,544 2013 $’000 488,732 41,551 112,755 314,701 – 866,499 957,739 2014 % 2013 % 86 94 65 71 93 80 91 80 103 86 – 88 Total debt 5.87 5.97 1,087,113 1,068,295 126 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 35. Financial risk management (continued) The table below shows the maturity profile of the interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as of 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013. 2014 AUD swaps GF AUD swap Woodlawn EUR swaps GF USD swaps GF USD swaps UBOC Facility AUD interest rate caps 2013 AUD swaps GF AUD swap Woodlawn EUR swaps GF USD swaps GF AUD interest rate caps Fair value AUD$’000 Undiscounted fair value AUD$’000 Up to 12 months AUD$’000 1 to 5 years AUD$’000 After 5 years AUD$’000 (69,773) (100) (21,393) (40,132) (745) 139 (76,353) (101) (21,746) (41,435) (650) 161 (18,001) (101) (3,407) (11,919) (911) – (47,037) (11,315) – (12,284) (25,261) (308) 91 – (6,055) (4,255) 569 70 (132,004) (140,124) (34,339) (84,799) (20,986) (83,281) (91,499) (21,272) (53,883) (16,344) (913) (20,486) (50,027) 438 (931) (21,212) (51,604) 552 (362) (5,164) (26,550) – (569) (10,034) (23,047) 188 – (6,014) (2,007) 364 (154,269) (164,694) (53,348) (87,345) (24,001) The gain or loss from remeasuring the hedging instruments at fair value is deferred in equity in the hedging reserve, to the extent that the hedge is effective, and reclassified into profit and loss when the hedged interest expense is recognised. The ineffective portion is recognised in the income statement immediately. In the year ended 30 June 2014, a net loss of $1,784,000 was recorded (2013: $1,832,000 net gain) and included in finance costs. Sensitivity The Group’s sensitivity to interest rate movement of net result before tax and equity has been determined based on the exposure to interest rates at the reporting date. A sensitivity of 100 basis points has been selected across the 3 currencies to which the Group is exposed to floating rate debt: AUD, EUR, and USD. The 100 basis points sensitivity is reasonable as it is deemed to be flat across the yield curve. The Trust’s sensitivity to interest rate movement of net loss before tax and equity have been determined based on the exposure to interest rates at the reporting date. A sensitivity of 100 basis points has been selected. The 100 basis points sensitivity is deemed to be flat across the yield curve and is a reasonable estimate of movement based on current long term and short term interest rates. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 127 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 35. Financial risk management (continued) 2014 AUD $’000 Effect on income statement Cash Borrowings Woodlawn UBOC facility Capitalised loan cost AUD EUR USD AUD EUR USD AUD USD AUD USD Derivatives – interest rate swaps AUD EUR USD AUD USD AUD Woodlawn UBOC facility Derivatives – interest rate cap Total income statement Effect on hedge reserve Derivatives – interest rate swaps AUD EUR USD AUD USD Woodlawn UBOC facility Total hedge reserve Total effect on equity 11,901 19,467 49,331 80,699 532,423 110,752 336,370 49,993 57,575 (5,064) (7,004) 1,075,045 456,328 72,401 237,275 21,954 53,544 28,193 456,328 72,401 237,275 21,954 53,544 INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP AUD +100 bps AUD -100 bps EUR +100 bps EUR -100 bps USD +100 bps USD -100 bps 119 (119) 195 (6) 493 (16) (761) 761 (30) – 30 – 2,117 (2,117) – – 263 (111) (384) 117 (991) 323 – – (1) – – – 9 – – – 1,708 (1,556) (189) 111 (499) 316 18,522 (18,522) 56 (56) 5,614 (5,614) 11,804 (11,804) 2,057 (2,057) 18,578 (18,578) 20,286 (20,134) 5,614 5,425 (5,614) 13,861 (13,861) (5,503) 13,362 (13,545) 128 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 35. Financial risk management (continued) AUD +100 bps AUD -100 bps EUR +100 bps EUR -100 bps USD +100 bps USD -100 bps 2013 (Restated) AUD $’000 Effect on income statement Cash Borrowings Woodlawn Capitalised loan cost AUD EUR USD AUD EUR USD AUD AUD Derivatives – interest rate swaps AUD EUR USD AUD AUD Woodlawn Derivatives – interest rate cap Total income statement Effect on hedge reserve Derivatives – interest rate swaps AUD EUR USD AUD Woodlawn Total hedge reserve Total effect on equity 48,276 21,893 51,044 121,213 539,380 109,211 367,842 51,862 (9,716) 1,058,579 488,732 112,755 314,701 41,551 39,998 488,732 112,755 314,701 41,551 483 (483) (506) 506 (103) – 103 – 2,654 (2,654) – 376 – (212) 219 – 544 – (35) 12 (531) 224 208 (208) – – 2,904 (2,740) 392 (196) 13 224 21,553 (21,553) 502 (502) 6,207 (6,207) 19,412 (19,412) 22,055 (22,055) 24,959 (24,795) 6,207 6,599 (6,207) 19,412 (19,412) (6,403) 19,425 (19,188) The effect on the Group’s net result is largely due to the Group’s exposure to interest rates on its non-hedged variable rate borrowings. The effect on hedge reserve is due to the effective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges. 2014 Effect on income statement Cash 2013 Effect on income statement Cash INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP AUD $’000 AUD +100 bps AUD -100 bps 392 383 4 4 (4) (4) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 129 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 35. Financial risk management (continued) Foreign exchange risk Operational FX risk The Group has operations in Australia and the US. The Group generates AUD and USD revenue from these operations. The Group is exposed to a decline in value of USD versus the AUD, decreasing the value of AUD equivalent revenue from its US wind farm operations. Equity FX risk The Group has an investment in its US operations that exceeds the value of its external USD debt. The Group is exposed to a decline in value of USD versus the AUD, decreasing the AUD equivalent value of its investment in the US wind farms. EUR debt FX risk The Group has a residual EUR76m (FY13: EUR77m) debt position from its previous investments in Spain, France and Germany. This legacy EUR debt is not offset with any operational EUR assets. The Group is exposed to a decline in value of AUD versus the EUR, increasing the AUD equivalent value of its EUR debt. The Group has partially hedged this EUR77m exposure with: ƒ Prepayments of EUR1m of EUR debt in the period ƒ EUR 13.4m cash holdings as an FX Call option ƒ The table below splits out the P&L and equity movements of this exposure 2014 EUR Global Facility debt EUR repayment Cash 2013 EUR Global Facility debt EUR repayment USD forward cover Cash EUR exposure EUR€’000 Market value – FX derivatives AUD$’000 FX gain/loss movement AUD$’000 Gain taken to P&L AUD$’000 Gain equity – hedge accounted AUD$’000 (77,485) 999 13,444 (63,042) (93,356) 15,871 – 15,533 (61,952) – – – – – – 2,536 – 2,536 (2,989) (65) 519 (2,535) (16,097) 2,736 2,536 2,678 (8,147) (2,989) (65) 519 (2,535) (16,097) 2,736 – 2,678 (10,683) – – – – – – 2,536 – 2,536 130 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 35. Financial risk management (continued) USD FX risk The Group has short to medium term USD FX liabilities that it hedges with foreign exchange derivatives. The outstanding USD FX derivative balances and market values are shown below. 2014 USD call option 2013 USD call option FX Hedging Base $’000 Maturity FX Rate at inception Spot FX Rate Market Value Financial Asset/ (Liability) AUD$’000 USD 25,000 November 14 0.9663 0.9420 AUD 994 USD 25,000 November 13 1.0170 0.9275 AUD 2,536 The Group has a multi-currency corporate debt facility and where practicable aims to ensure the majority of its debt and expenses are denominated in the same currency as the associated revenue and investments. The Group’s balance sheet exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date is shown below. This represents the EUR and USD assets and liabilities the Group holds in AUD functional currency. Foreign currency Cash Short term intercompany loans FX call option Net investment in foreign operations Trade payables Bank loans 2014 2013 EUR€'000 USD$'000 EUR€'000 USD$'000 19,298 33,414 – 9,803 (64) (98,339) 38,134 21,698 26,539 318,946 (178) (5,519) 21,546 24,499 – 20,679 (768) (96,970) 40,013 2,710 26,954 296,896 (158) (27,429) Total exposure (foreign currency ’000) (35,888) 399,620 (31,014) 338,986 Sensitivity The following table details the Group’s pre-tax sensitivity to a 10 percent change in the AUD against the USD and the EUR, with all other variables held constant, as at the reporting date, for its unhedged foreign exchange exposure. A sensitivity of 10 percent has been selected as this is determined to be a reasonable measure for assessing the effect of exchange rate movements. Consolidated AUD’000 2014 Income statement Foreign currency translation reserve 2013 Income statement Foreign currency translation reserve AUD/EUR +10 % AUD/EUR -10% AUD/USD +10% AUD/USD -10% 4,569 (980) 5,169 (2,068) (4,569) 980 (5,169) 2,068 (8,067) (31,895) (4,209) (29,690) 8,067 31,895 4,209 29,690 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 131 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 35. Financial risk management (continued) Electricity and environmental certificates (including LGC) price risks The Group has operations in Australia and the US and sells electricity and environmental certificates to utility companies, industrial customers and to wholesale markets in the regions it operates. The financial risk to the Group is that a decrease in the electricity or environmental certificate price reduces revenue earned. To mitigate the financial risks of electricity and environmental certificate prices falling, the Group has entered into power purchase agreements and green product purchase agreements to partially contract the sale price of the electricity and environmental certificates it produces. In undertaking this strategy of contracting a percentage of its electricity and environmental certificate sales, the Group is willing to forgo a percentage of the potential economic benefit that would arise in an increasing electricity and environmental certificate price environment, to protect against downside risks of decreasing electricity and environmental certificate prices; thereby securing a greater level of predictability of cash flows. Sensitivity The following table details the Group’s pre-tax sensitivity to a 10 percent change in the electricity and environmental certificate price, with all other variables held constant as at the reporting date, for its exposure to the electricity market. A sensitivity of 10 percent has been selected given the current level of electricity and environmental certificate prices and the volatility observed on an historic basis and market expectations for future movement. Consolidated AUD $’000 2014 Income statement 2013 Income statement Electricity/ LGC Price +10% Electricity/ LGC Price -10% 7,019 (7,019) 6,911 (6,911) Credit risk Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group and the Trust. The Group’s credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks, as well as credit exposures to customers. The Group’s exposure is continuously monitored and the aggregate value of transactions is spread among creditworthy counterparties. The Trust has credit risk exposure to a group of counterparties having similar characteristics, being other members of the Group. The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit-ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies. The Group does not have any significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or any group of counterparties having similar characteristics. Infigen as a generator generally sells electricity to large utility companies that operate in the regions that Infigen has operations. The utility companies are situated in Australia and in many different states of the US. No one utility company or other off take counterparty represents a significant portion of the total accounts receivable balance. The Group’s credit risk on liquid funds and derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with credit ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies at above investment grade. The carrying amount of financial assets, recorded in the financial statements, represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk. The Trust’s carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, net of any allowances for losses, represents its maximum exposure to credit risk. 132 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 35. Financial risk management (continued) INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Consolidated 2014 Bank deposits Trade receivables Other current receivables Amounts due from related parties (associates) 2013 Bank deposits Trade receivables Other current receivables Amounts due from related parties (associates) Consolidated 2014 Bank deposits Loans to related parties 2013 Bank deposits Loans to related parties Within credit terms $’000 Past due but not impaired $’000 Impaired $’000 1,464 – – – 1,409 – – – – – – – – – – – Description Credit rating investment grade Spread geographically with large utility companies Sale settlement period Loan to associated entities Credit rating investment grade Spread geographically with large utility companies Sale settlement period Loan to associated entities INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP Past due but not impaired $’000 Impaired $’000 Description – – – – – – Credit rating investment grade – Due from members of Infigen Group – – Credit rating investment grade – Due from members of Infigen Group – 79,235 25,419 3,733 804 119,804 30,222 1,504 771 Within credit terms $’000 392 742,619 743,011 383 741,820 742,203 Liquidity risks The Group and the Trust manages liquidity risks by maintaining adequate reserves, banking facilities and reserve borrowing facilities by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities. The tables below set out the Group’s and the Trust’s financial assets and financial liabilities at balance sheet date and places them into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. The tables include the Group’s forecast contractual repayments under the Global Facility and the Project Finance Facility. From 1 July 2010 the Global Facility terms provide that net cash flows from the companies included in the Global Facility borrower group be applied to repay amounts outstanding under the Global Facility. WWCS Finance Pty Ltd, an Excluded Company for the purposes of the Global Facility, is the holder of project finance debt. For interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, the cash flows have been estimated using forward interest rates applicable at the reporting date. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 133 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 35. Financial risk management (continued) 2014 Global Facility debt Project finance debt – Woodlawn UBOC loan debt Interest rate swap payable – Global Facility Interest rate swap payable – Woodlawn UBOC loan – interest rate swap Interest rate cap receivable FX and other options Current payables 2013 Global Facility debt Project finance debt – Woodlawn Interest rate swap payable – Global Facility Interest rate swap payable – Woodlawn Interest rate cap receivable Covered forward FX contract Current payables Consolidated 2014 Amounts due to related parties 2013 Amounts due to related parties INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP Up to 12 months $’000 1 to 5 years $’000 After 5 years $’000 Total contractual cash flows $’000 49,779 5,018 9,187 33,326 101 911 – 994 32,419 30,082 1,082 52,986 362 – 2,585 33,830 224,232 705,534 33,747 34,190 84,583 – 308 (91) – – 11,228 14,198 21,625 – (569) (70) – – 280,327 706,024 50,780 86,965 569 (188) – – – 24,365 – (364) – – 979,545 49,993 57,575 139,534 101 650 (161) 994 32,419 1,016,433 51,862 164,316 931 (552) 2,585 33,830 INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP Up to 12 months $’000 1 to 5 years $’000 Over 5 years $’000 Total contractual cash flows $’000 3,511 2,875 – – – – 3,511 2,875 Fair value measurements The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes. From 1 July 2009, the Group adopted the amendment to AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures which requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy: a) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1) b) inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices) (level 2); and c) inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (level 3). 134 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 35. Financial risk management (continued) The following tables present the Group’s assets and liabilities measured and recognised at fair value at 30 June 2014. Level 1 $’000 Level 2 $’000 Level 3 $’000 Total $’000 2014 Assets FX option Interest rate cap – Woodlawn Interest rate swap – UBOC facility Investment in financial asset Total assets Liabilities Interest rate swaps – Global Facility Interest rate swap – Woodlawn Interest rate swap – UBOC facility Total liabilities 2013 Assets USD FX forward cover option Interest rate cap – Woodlawn Total assets Liabilities Interest rate swaps – Global Facility Interest rate swaps – Woodlawn Total liabilities 994 139 164 – 1,297 131,298 100 909 132,307 2,585 438 3,023 153,793 913 154,706 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 86,384 86,384 – – – – – – – – – – 994 139 164 86,384 87,681 131,298 100 909 132,307 2,585 438 3,023 153,793 913 154,706 Capital risk management The Group’s and Trust’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can generate value for securityholders and unitholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an appropriate capital structure to minimise the cost of capital respectively. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group and the Trust may adjust the amount of distributions or dividends paid to securityholders/unitholders, return capital to securityholders, buy back existing securities or issue new securities or sell assets to reduce debt. The capital structure of the Group consists of debt finance facilities as listed in Note 17, and equity, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings as listed in Notes 20, 21 and 22. Through the year to 30 June 2014, the Group has had to maintain the following ratio in regards to compliance with its various facilities: Global Facility – leverage ratio, net debt/EBITDA1; WWCS Finance Pty Ltd, Woodlawn project finance facility – debt service coverage ratio (DSCR); Bank Facility Union Bank – DSCR ratio. The Group has maintained its various banking ratios during FY14 and FY13. 1 Refer to Note 17(i) – Financial Covenants. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 135 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 36. Parent entity financial information (a) Summary financial information As at and for the year ended 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013, the parent entity of the Infigen Energy Group was Infigen Energy Limited (IEL). The parent entity of the Infigen Energy Trust Group was Infigen Energy Trust (IET). The individual financial statements for the parent entities show the following aggregate amounts: Results of the parent entity Current assets Total assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Shareholders’ equity Issued capital Retained earnings Profit/(loss) for the year Total comprehensive income INFIGEN ENERGY GROUP INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST GROUP 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 2014 $’000 2013 $’000 715,142 832,492 829,881 833,524 2,305 (3,336) (1,031) 7,439 7,439 705,911 826,336 831,212 834,807 2,305 (10,775) (8,470) (19,543) (19,543) 392 383 764,650 763,842 3,511 3,511 753,894 7,245 761,139 (646) (646) 2,875 2,875 753,076 7,891 760,967 (646) (646) Due to the stapled structure of IEL, IET and IEBL, the summary financial information of the parent entities shows a net current liability as at 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2014. When combined with the other stapled entities, the parent has positive net current assets and net total assets. (b) Guarantees entered into by the parent entities IEL has provided a guarantee over a lease in favour of American Fund US Investments LP in relation to its Dallas office which was executed on 26 June 2009. A performance guarantee dated 31 March 2010 has also been provided by IEL in relation to a contract to supply energy. The fair value of these guarantees is immaterial. IET has not provided financial guarantees in respect of loans and subsidiaries. (c) Contingent liabilities of the parent entities As at the end of the period, IEL and IET did not have any contingent liabilities that it would expect to have a material impact on its financial statements. (d) Contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant or equipment As at 30 June 2014, IEL and IET had no contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant or equipment (30 June 2013: $nil). (e) Deed of Cross Guarantee IEL has entered into a Deed of Cross Guarantee with the effect that the company guarantees debts in respect of certain of its subsidiaries. Further details of the Deed of Cross Guarantee and the subsidiaries subject to the deed, are disclosed in Notes 29 and 30. 136 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Directors’ Declaration In the opinion of the Directors of Infigen Energy Limited (‘IEL’) and the Directors of the Responsible Entity of Infigen Energy Trust (‘IET’), Infigen Energy RE Limited (‘IERL’) (collectively referred to as ‘the Directors’): (a) the financial statements and notes of IEL and its controlled entities, including IET and its controlled entities and Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (the ‘Infigen Energy Group’) and IET and its controlled entities (the ‘Infigen Energy Trust Group’) set out on pages 70 to 136 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: (i) complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and (ii) giving a true and fair view of Infigen Energy Group’s and Infigen Energy Trust Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of their performance for the financial year ended on that date; and (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that both Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group will be able to pay their debts as and when they become due and payable. Note 1(a) confirms that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The Directors have been given the declarations by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001. This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors pursuant to section 295(5) of the Corporations Act 2001. On behalf of the Directors of IEL and IERL: M HuTcHInson Chairman Sydney, 25 August 2014 M george managing DireCtor anD Chief exeCutive offiCer DiReCtoRS’ DeClARAtion | 137 Independent auditor’s report to the stapled security holders of Infigen Energy Group and the unit holders of Infigen Energy Trust Group Report on the financial report We have audited the accompanying financial report which comprises:   the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2014, and the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies, other explanatory notes and the directors’ declaration for Infigen Energy Group, being the consolidated stapled group (“Infigen Energy Group”). The Infigen Energy Group, as described in Note 1 to the financial report, comprises Infigen Energy Limited, Infigen Energy Trust, Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited and the entities controlled at the years end, or from time to time during the financial year, by Infigen Energy Limited and Infigen Energy Trust the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2014, and the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies, other explanatory notes and the directors’ declaration for Infigen Energy Trust Group, (“Infigen Energy Trust Group”). The Infigen Energy Trust Group comprises Infigen Energy Trust and the entities it controlled at the years end or from time to time during the financial year. Directors’ responsibility for the financial report The directors of Infigen Energy Limited and the directors of Infigen Energy Trust (collectively referred to as “the directors”) are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards. Auditor’s responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757 Darling Park Tower 2, 201 Sussex Street, GPO BOX 2650, SYDNEY NSW 1171 T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. 138 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report. estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. our audit opinion. Independence Independence In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 . Act 2001. Auditor’s opinion Auditor’s opinion In our opinion: In our opinion: (a) (a) the financial report of Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group is in accordance the financial report of Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: with the Corporations Act 2001, including: (i) (i) (ii) (ii) giving a true and fair view of Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group’s giving a true and fair view of Infigen Energy Group and Infigen Energy Trust Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of their performance for the year ended on that financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and date; and complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001. . (b) (b) the financial report and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as the financial report and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1. disclosed in Note 1. Report on the Remuneration Report Report on the Remuneration Report We have audited the remuneration report included in pages 56 to 67 of the directors’ report for the year We have audited the remuneration report included in pages 56 to 67 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2014. The directors of Infigen Energy Group are responsible for the preparation and ended 30 June 2014. The directors of Infigen Energy Group are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Auditor’s opinion Auditor’s opinion In our opinion, the remuneration report of Infigen Energy Group for the year ended 30 June 2014 In our opinion, the remuneration report of Infigen Energy Group for the year ended 30 June 2014 complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. PricewaterhouseCoopers PricewaterhouseCoopers Marc Upcroft Marc Upcroft Partner Partner Sydney 25 August 2014 Sydney 25 August 2014 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT | 139 ADDITIONAL INVESTOR INFORMATION Important Aspects of the US Assets LLC Project Agreements – Change of Control Provisions The limited liability company agreements (each a Project LLC Agreement) of the various Project LLCs for the US Assets provide for two levels of membership interests: Class A and Class B. The Class B Members serve as the managing members of the company. The managing members have control over and manage the affairs of the Project LLC, but the consent of the Class A Members is required for certain material actions to be taken by the Project LLC (such as the incurrence of debt, sale of material assets, mergers, acquisitions, sale of the Project LLC or other similar actions). Transfers of membership interests are permitted subject to (a) a right of first bid procedure for the benefit of non-transferring members, (b) a prohibition against transfers to certain disqualified transferees (such as competitors of the Project LLC), (c) prior to the Reallocation Date, transfers of Class B interests require consent of a designated super-majority of the Class A interests, and (d) Class A interests may be transferred after ten years if the Reallocation Date has not been reached and distributions have failed to exceed the sum of the Class B Members’ capital contributions. A change of control in a member of a Project LLC must comply with the foregoing transfer restrictions, except that an event causing a change of control of a member’s ultimate parent company does not constitute a change of control. The relevant Project LLC Agreements provide that a change purported to be made in breach of these provisions is void and that specific performance in respect of those clauses can be sought. In addition, breach of these provisions may give rise to a claim of damages. Bermuda Law Issues Incorporation: Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (IEBL) is incorporated in Bermuda. Takeovers: Unlike IEL and IET, IEBL is not subject to the sections in Chapter 6 of the Corporations Act 2001 dealing with the acquisition of shares (including substantial holdings and takeovers). Bermuda company law does not have a takeover code which effectively means that a takeover of IEBL will be regulated under Australian takeover law. However, Section 103 of the Bermuda Companies Act 2001 provides that where an offer is made for shares of a company and, within four months of the offer the holders of not less than 90% of the shares which are the subject of such offer accept, the offeror may by notice require the non-tendering shareholders to transfer their shares on the terms of the offer. Dissenting shareholders may apply to the court within one month of the notice, objecting to the transfer. The test is one of fairness to the body of the shareholders and not to individuals, and the burden is on the dissentient shareholder to prove unfairness, not merely that the scheme is open to criticism. Stapled Securities Each Stapled Security is made up of one IEL share, one IET unit and one IEBL share which, under each of the Constitutions and Bye-Laws respectively, are stapled together and cannot be traded or dealt with separately. In accordance with its requirements in respect of listed stapled securities, ASX reserves the right to remove any or all of IEL, IEBL and IET from the Official List if, while the stapling arrangements apply, the securities in one of these entities ceases to be stapled to the securities in the other entities or one of these entities issues securities which are not then stapled to the relevant securities in the other entities. 140 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Further Investor Information Further information required by the Australian Securities Exchange and not shown elsewhere in this Report is as detailed below. The information is current as at 29 August 2014. Number of Stapled Securities and Holders One share in each of IEL and IEBL, and one unit in IET, have been stapled together to form a single IFN stapled security. The total number of IFN stapled securities on issue as at 29 August 2014 was 767,887,581 and the number of holders of these stapled securities was 20,040. Substantial Securityholders The names of substantial IFN securityholders who have notified IFN in accordance with section 671B of the Corporations Act 2001 are set out below. Substantial IFN securityholder Date of notice Number % IFN Stapled Securities The Children’s Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP 6 July 2012 249,603,481 32.74 VV & SS Sethu 22 August 2014 47,000,000 6.13 Voting Rights It is generally expected that General Meetings of shareholders of IEL, shareholders of IEBL, and unitholders of IET will be held concurrently where proposed resolutions relate to all three Infigen entities. At these General Meetings of IEL, IEBL and IET the voting rights outlined below will apply. Voting rights in relation to General Meetings of IEL and IEBL: ƒ on a show of hands, each shareholder of IEL and IEBL who is present in person and each other person who is present as a proxy, attorney or duly appointed corporate representative of a shareholder has one vote; and ƒ on a poll, each shareholder of IEL and IEBL who is present in person has one vote for each share they hold. Also each person present as a proxy, attorney or duly appointed corporate representative of a shareholder, has one vote for each share held by the shareholder that the person represents. Voting rights in relation to General Meetings of IET: ƒ on a show of hands, each unitholder who is present in person and each other person who is present as a proxy, attorney or duly appointed corporate representative of a unitholder has one vote; and ƒ on a poll, each unitholder who is present in person has one vote for each one dollar of the value of the units in IET held by the unitholder. Also, each person present as proxy, attorney or duly appointed corporate representative of a unitholder has one vote for each one dollar of the value of the units in IET held by the unitholder that the person represents. Stapled Securities that are Restricted or Subject to Voluntary Escrow There are currently no IFN stapled securities that are restricted or subject to voluntary escrow. On-Market Security Buy-Back There is no current on-market buy-back of IFN Stapled Securities. Distribution of IFN Stapled Securities The distribution of IFN stapled securities amongst IFN securityholders as at 29 August 2014 is set out below. Category 1–1,000 1,001–5,000 5,001–10,000 10,001–100,000 100,001– and over Total Securityholders 8,872 7,957 1,430 1,586 195 Securities 4,049,915 20,030,861 10,725,974 44,648,656 688,432,175 20,040 767,887,581 As at 29 August 2014, the number of securityholders holding less than a marketable parcel of IFN stapled securities was 12,470. Twenty Largest IFN Securityholders The 20 largest IFN securityholders as at 29 August 2014 are set out below. Rank IFN Securityholder 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited National Nominees Limited HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited – A/C 2 HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited – GSCO ECA Valamoon PTY LTD Kolley PTY LTD Bond Street Custodians Limited Pacific Custodians Pty Limited ABN AMRO Clearing Sydney Nominees PTY LTD BNP Paribas Noms PTY LTD 13 Walsal Nominees PTY LTD NO2 14 Mr Trevor Yuen 15 Tappet Holdings PTY LTD 16 Mr Paul Frederick Bennett 17 18 19 20 Valamoon PTY Limited Shomron PTY LTD HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited – A/C 3 Pinefield Nominees PTY LTD Total Top 20 Total of Other Securityholders Grand Total of IFN Stapled Securities IFN Stapled Securities Held Number Percentage 316,348,355 135,691,465 59,135,461 38,484,481 19,525,039 11,975,047 6,035,155 5,404,727 4,327,735 4,087,213 4,032,243 3,728,184 3,700,885 3,683,992 3,266,115 3,139,532 2,915,000 2,380,000 2,169,508 1,837,500 631,867,637 136,019,944 767,887,581 41.20% 17.67% 7.70% 5.01% 2.54% 1.56% 0.79% 0.70% 0.56% 0.53% 0.53% 0.49% 0.48% 0.48% 0.43% 0.41% 0.38% 0.31% 0.28% 0.24% 82.29% 17.71% 100.00% ADDITIONAL INVESTOR INFORMATION | 141 ADDITIONAL INVESTOR INFORMATION CONTINUED Key ASX Releases The key releases lodged with the Australian Securities Exchange and released to the market throughout FY14 are listed below. Dates shown are when releases were made to the ASX. 2013 12 July 31 July 16 August 23 August 10 September 25 September 27 September 16 October 22 October 31 October 13 November 15 November 4 December 10 December 2014 13 January 20 January 31 January Notice of Change in Substantial Holding (Kairos Fund Limited) Infigen Announces Fourth Quarter FY13 Production and Revenue Impairment of US Assets and Guidance Confirmation Infigen Energy FY13 Full Year Results Notice of Initial Substantial Holder (VV & SS Sethu) Presentation to the Macquarie Alternative Energy Conference Infigen Energy Trust – FY13 Annual Financial Report Infigen Energy 2013 Annual Report and AGM Notice of Meeting Presentation to the Australian Microcap Investment Conference Infigen Announces First Quarter FY14 Production and Revenue Infigen Acquires Class A Interests in its US Portfolio AGM Presentations and AGM Results Change of Director’s Interest Notice Notice of Change in Substantial Holding (Kairos Fund Limited) Notice of Ceasing to be a Substantial Holder (Kairos Fund Limited) Change of Director’s Interest Notice Infigen Announces Second Quarter FY14 Production and Revenue 26 February FY14 Interim Financial Results 30 April 5 June Infigen Announces Third Quarter FY14 Production and Revenue Notice of Ceasing to be a Substantial Holder (Leo Fund Managers LTD on behalf of Leo Capital Growth SPC) The above list does not include all releases made to the ASX. A comprehensive list and full details of all publications can be found on the Infigen website: www.infigenenergy.com, and the ASX website: www.asx.com.au. 142 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 GLOSSARY ASX AWEA BOP CAPACITY Australian Securities Exchange Limited (ABN 98 008 624 691) or Australian Securities Exchange as the context requires American Wind Energy Association, a trade association representing wind power project developers, equipment suppliers, services providers, parts manufacturers, utilities, researchers, and others involved in the wind industry. Infigen is a member. www.awea.org Balance of plant The maximum power that a wind turbine was designed to produce CAPACITY FACTOR A measure of the productivity of a wind turbine, calculated by the amount of power that a wind turbine produces over a set time period, divided by the amount of power that would have been produced if the turbine had been running at full capacity during that same time period CARBON PRICE The currency of greenhouse gas emission abatement schemes. The price is normally attributable to one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent CEC Clean Energy Council, the peak body representing Australia’s clean energy sector. It is an industry association made up of member companies in the fields of renewable energy and energy efficiency. Infigen is a member. www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au CLASS A MEMBERS Holders of Class A membership interests in Institutional Equity Partnerships (IEPs) in relation to the US wind farms CLASS A MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS The interests held by Class A members which have varying economic entitlements (tax allocations and cash distributions) depending on the age of the US wind farms CLASS B MEMBERS Holders of Class B membership interests in Institutional Equity Partnerships (IEPs) in relation to the US wind farms CLASS B MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS CO2 CO2e DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE The interests held by Class B members which have varying economic entitlements depending on the age of the US wind farms Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide equivalent Infigen’s prospective renewable energy projects that are in various stages of development prior to commencing construction. Stages of development include: landowner negotiations; wind monitoring, project feasibility and investment evaluation; community consultation, cultural heritage, environmental assessment; design, supplier negotiations and connection DISTRIBUTIONS Distributions of cash or stapled securities under the DRP made by Infigen to securityholders DRP DWA EBITDA Distribution Reinvestment Plan Dispatch weighted average (electricity prices) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation FINANCIAL YEAR A period of 12 months starting on 1 July and ending on 30 June in the next calendar year GRID GW GWh IAM IEBL IEL IEP IERL IET IFN LGC LLC The network of power lines and associated equipment required to deliver electricity from generators to consumers Gigawatt. One billion Watts of electricity Gigawatt hour Infigen Asset Management. Infigen’s US asset management business Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (ARBN 116 360 715) Infigen Energy Limited (ABN 39 105 051 616) Institutional Equity Partnerships Infigen Energy RE Limited (ACN 113 813 997) (AFSL 290 710), the responsible entity of IET Infigen Energy Trust (ARSN 116 244 118) The code for the trading of listed Infigen stapled securities on the ASX Large-scale Generation Certificates. The certificates are created by large-scale renewable energy generators and represent 1 MWh of renewable generation Limited liability companies formed under US law GLOSSARY | 143 GLOSSARY CONTINUED LLC AGREEMENT A limited liability company agreement between the members of an LLC LRET MW MWh NOCF OCC Large-scale Renewable Energy Target – Legislated Australian target effective 1 January 2011. The rate of liability for LRET is established by the Renewable Power Percentage (RPP), which is used to determine how many LGCs need to be surrendered each year. The RPP for the 2014 calendar year is 9.87%. It is equivalent to 16.95 million LGCs and represents a proportion of total estimated Australian electricity consumption for the 2014 year Megawatt. One million Watts of electricity Megawatt hour Net operating cash flow. Cash flow from operations after financing costs and taxes paid Operations Control Centre, a centrally located business function within Infigen that monitors and directs the operations of Infigen’s wind and solar farms OPERATING EBITDA Operating earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Excludes corporate costs, non-operating costs and non-operating income P50 PPA PRE- COMMISSIONING PROJECT LLC PTC PV The best estimate of electricity production in a year where there is a 50% probability that the given level of electricity production will be exceeded in any year. This may also be referred to as long term mean electricity production Power Purchase Agreement. A contract between a generator of electricity (the seller) and a purchaser of electricity (buyer), typically an electricity retailer Operation of the wind farm prior to practical completion, during which all aspects are tested for performance against specified criteria LLC in the US which owns a wind farm where Infigen holds direct or indirect Class B membership interests Production Tax Credit: the result of the US Energy Policy Act of 1992, a tax credit that applies to wholesale electrical generators of US wind energy facilities based upon the amount of electricity generated in a year Photovoltaic REALLOCATION DATE The date from which tax benefits and cash distributions are shared between the Class A Members and the Class B Members, being a date which occurs when the Class A Members’ target return has been achieved REC RES RET RPP RPS SECURITYHOLDER SITE AVAILABILITY Renewable Energy Credit Renewable Electricity Standards, also known as a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). These programs apply for 37 US states plus the District of Columbia, and are based on a fixed quantity system whereby a renewable energy generator such as a wind farm is issued with renewable energy credits which can be onsold to energy retailers who are required to surrender them to a state based regulator Renewable Energy Target, consists of a Large-scale Renewable Energy Target and a Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme, to create a financial incentive for investment in renewable energy sources through the creation and sale of renewable energy certificates in Australia Renewable Power Percentage, being an annual target set by the Clean Energy Regulator designed to achieve the target of generation of 41,850 GWh of electricity from renewable sources in Australia by 2020. www.ret.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au Renewable Portfolio Standards. See RES The registered holder of an IFN stapled security A percentage to indicate the duration of time a wind turbine has been available to generate electricity. A number lower than 100% indicates a wind turbine has not been able to generate because of a reason attributed to a balance of plant or wind turbine problem SOLAR PV STAPLED SECURITY One unit in IET, one ordinary share in IEL and one ordinary share in IEBL, stapled together to form an Solar photovoltaic IFN stapled security such that the unit and those shares cannot be traded or dealt with separately TURBINE AVAILABILITY A percentage to indicate the duration of time a wind turbine has been available to generate electricity. A number lower than 100% indicates a wind turbine has not been able to generate because of a reason attributed to a wind turbine problem TW TWA TWh UNIT Terawatt. One trillion Watts of electricity Time weighted average electricity prices (merchant) Terawatt hour An ordinary unit in IET UNITHOLDER WTG The registered holder of a Unit Wind turbine generator 144 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CORPORATE DIRECTORY INFIGEN ENERGY Level 22, 56 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia +61 2 8031 9900 www.infigenenergy.com DIRECTORS Michael Hutchinson (Non-Executive Chairman) Miles George (Managing Director) Philip Green (Non-Executive Director) Fiona Harris (Non-Executive Director) Ross Rolfe AO (Non-Executive Director) COMPANY SECRETARY David Richardson ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Infigen Energy’s 2014 Annual General Meeting will be held at 11am on 20 November 2014 at the Radisson Blu Plaza Hotel, 27 O’Connell Street, Sydney, Australia. IFN STAPLED SECURITIES Each stapled security in Infigen Energy, tradable on the Australian Securities Exchange under the ‘IFN’ code, comprises: ƒ one share of Infigen Energy Limited, an Australian public company; ƒ one share of Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited, a company incorporated in Bermuda; and ƒ one unit of Infigen Energy Trust, an Australian registered managed investment scheme. DISCLAIMER This publication is issued by Infigen Energy Limited (IEL), Infigen Energy (Bermuda) Limited (IEBL) and Infigen Energy RE Limited as responsible entity for Infigen Energy Trust (collectively Infigen). To the maximum extent permitted by law, Infigen and its respective related entities, directors, officers and employees (collectively Infigen Entities) do not accept, and expressly disclaim, any liability whatsoever (including for negligence) for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this publication or its contents. This publication is not intended to constitute legal, tax or accounting advice or opinion. No representation, warranty or other assurance is made or given by or on behalf of the Infigen Entities that any projection, forecast, forward-looking statement or estimate contained in this publication should or will be achieved. None of the Infigen Entities or any member of the Infigen Energy group guarantees the performance of Infigen, the repayment of capital or a particular rate of return on Infigen stapled securities. IEL and IEBL are not licensed to provide financial product advice. This publication is for general information only and does not constitute financial product advice, including personal financial product advice, or an offer, invitation or recommendation in respect of securities, by IEL, IEBL or any other Infigen Entities. Note that, in providing this publication, the Infigen Entities have not considered the objectives, financial position or needs of the recipient. The recipient should obtain and rely on its own professional advice from its tax, legal, accounting and other professional advisers in respect of the recipient’s objectives, financial position or needs. All amounts expressed in dollars ($) in this Annual Report are Australian dollars, unless otherwise specified. RESPONSIBLE ENTITY FOR INFIGEN ENERGY TRUST Infigen Energy RE Limited Level 22, 56 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia +61 2 8031 9900 REGISTRY Link Market Services Limited Locked Bag A14 Sydney South NSW 1235 +61 1800 226 671 (toll free within Australia) Fax: +61 2 9287 0303 registrars@linkmarketservices.com.au www.linkmarketservices.com.au AUDITOR PricewaterhouseCoopers Darling Park Tower 2 201 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2650 Australia E T A N G I S E D Y B D E N G I S E D I N F I G E N E N E R G Y | A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 www.infigenenergy.com facebook.com/infigen @infigen

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above