Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Medical - Devices / Integer

Integer

itgr · NYSE Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker itgr
Exchange NYSE
Sector Healthcare
Industry Medical - Devices
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2001 Annual Report · Integer
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
1

0

0

2

t

r

o

p

e

r

l

a

u

n

n

a

T H E

P O W E R

T O   D O

G R E A T

T H I N G S TM

T H E   P O W E R   T O   D O   G R E A T   T H I N G S TM

®

W I L S O N   G R E A T B A T C H   T E C H N O L O G I E S ,

I N C .

Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc. / 10,000 Wehrle Drive / Clarence, New York 14031 / 716-759-6901 / www.greatbatch.com

®

Printed in U.S.A.

 
 
A B O U T W I L S O N G R E A T B A T C H T E C H N O L O G I E S

Wilson  Greatbatch  Technologies,  Inc.  (WGT)  is  a  leading  developer  and  manufacturer  of  power

sources,  wet  tantalum  capacitors  and  precision  engineered  components  used  in  implantable  medical

T H E

devices  and  other  demanding  applications.  For  over  30  years,  WGT’s  products  have  provided

THE POWER TO DO GREAT THINGSTM for the medical device industry. As medical technology

has  advanced,  WGT  has  led  the  way  in  the  development  of  smaller  and  more  powerful  batteries,

capacitors  and  precision  engineered  components  for  implantable  medical  devices. WGT’s  innovation

P O W E R

and expertise enable its customers to advance their systems’ technology: making implantable devices

smaller and longer lasting with enhanced functionality. WGT also leverages its expertise in designing

and  developing  innovative  power  sources  for  demanding  applications  such  as  aerospace,  oil  and  gas

exploration, and oceanographic applications around the world.

T O   D O

G R E A T

T H I N G S TM

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

Financial Highlights ............................................................................................................................1

Letter to Shareholders .........................................................................................................................3

Medical Technology ............................................................................................................................9

Commercial Technology ....................................................................................................................13

Selected Consolidated Financial Data................................................................................................15

Management’s Discussion & Analysis ...............................................................................................16

Consolidated Financial Statements ....................................................................................................24

Report of Independent Auditors.........................................................................................................26

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ......................................................................................26

Shareholder Information....................................................................................................................39

Board of Directors and Management .................................................................................................40

The Power To Do Great ThingsTM is a trademark of Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc.

OPERATIONS:

Implantable Power Sources
10,000 Wehrle Drive
Clarence, NY  14031

Capacitor Operations
4455 Genesee Street
Cheektowaga, NY  14225

Engineered Components
4096 Barton Road
Clarence, NY  14031

Greatbatch-Hittman, Inc.
9190 Red Branch Road
Columbia, MD  21045

Greatbatch-Sierra, Inc.
5200 Sigstrom Drive
Carson City, NV 89706

Electrochem
10,000 Wehrle Drive
Clarence, NY  14031

100 Energy Drive
Canton, MA  02021

F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S

Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations - diluted

$      0.58

$     0.07

$     (0.14)

$      0.06

(in thousands, except per share data and ratio analysis section) 

Fiscal Year

OPERATIONS

Revenues

Gross profit

Research, development and engineering (RD&E) costs, net

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation 
and amortization (EBITDA)

Income (loss) from continuing operations(b)

Net income (loss) 

Net earnings (loss) per share - basic

Net earnings (loss) per share - diluted

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted

CASH FLOW AND BALANCE SHEET

Depreciation and amortization

Cash flow from operations

Inventories

Total assets

Total debt  

Total liabilities

Total stockholders’ equity

RATIO ANALYSIS AND OTHER

Debt, net of cash, to total capitalization

Current ratio

Interest coverage ratio

Inventory turns

Number of employees

Number of registered shareholders

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997(a)

$ 135,575

$  97,790 

$   79,235 

$  77,361 

$  57,661 

60,859

12,575

36,034

11,591

8,597

42,344

9,941 

26,291 

1,020

(548)

38,178 

9,339 

40,907 

12,190 

22,152    

20,543 

(1,709)

(2,272) 

690

690

0.44

0.43

19,563

19,945

(0.04)

(0.18) 

(0.04)                       (0.18) 

14,167 

14,434 

12,491 

12,491 

0.07

0.06

10,461

10,677

30,498 

9,019 

12,346

(1,574) 

(1,574) 

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

$  13,929

$  12,102 

$   11,363 

$    9,190 

$    6,814

21,455

29,026

283,520

74,000

94,676

188,844

12%

2.85

10.04

3.5

1,152

233

18,160 

13,643 

181,647 

33,602 

45,813 

135,834 

20%

2.01

2.03

4.1

834

87

8,992 

13,583 

189,779 

132,402 

143,372 

46,407 

72%

2.12

1.65

3.1

734

NA

9,053               

(4,219)

13,291

194,390 

130,733 

148,795 

45,595 

72%

1.66

1.94

3.1

579

NA

9,872

111,709 

70,863 

83,470 

28,239

69%

1.74

1.50

3.0

586

NA

(a) The 1997 information includes Wilson Greatbatch Ltd. (“Predecessor”) for the period from January 1, 1997 to July 10, 1997 and Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc. for the period from July 11, 1997 to January 2, 1998 as if the July 1997 leveraged  

buyout had occurred on January 1, 1997. These amounts were derived by combining financial data from the audited historical financial statements of both Wilson Greatbatch Ltd. and Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc. for fiscal 1997. Such 
amounts exclude the write-off of purchased, in-process research, development and engineering cost of $23.8 million and transaction expenses of $11.1 million. It includes additional interest of $3.9 million and additional intangible amortization 
of $1.8 million. 

(b) Represents income (loss) before extraordinary loss and cumulative effect of accounting change.

OUR MISSION...To  be  the  world’s  leading  independent  manufacturer

manufacturing  innovative  products  that  contribute  to  the  benefit  of

of  innovative  power  sources,  precision  components,  and  provider  of

society.  Over  the  long  term,  we  will  promote  the  security  of  our  share-

specialty  devices  for  medical  science  and  similar  technically  demanding

holders’ investment, the security of supply to our customers and the security

applications. 

of opportunity for our employees. We will emphasize safety, quality and

OUR VISION...To enhance the value of the Company for its customers,

customer satisfaction in order to promote personal and business growth in

the WGT employee team members and its shareholders by developing and

an environment that encourages openness, trust and teamwork.

1

w

i

l

s

o

n

g

r

e

a

t

b

a

t

c

h

t

e

c

h

n

o

l

o

g

i

e

s

,

i

n

c

.

 
 
■
1

0

0

2

t

r

o

p

e

r

l

a

u

n

n

a

e n a b l

i n g  

t e c h n o l o g i e s

t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

e n •a¯´bl´i n g

 
 
Edward F. Voboril
Chairman, President
and CEO

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS,

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

OUR CUSTOMERS AND

OUR EMPLOYEES...

I am proud to report that our company

has  had  a  year  of  accomplishment

from  every  point  of  view.  Organic

The year 2001 was an outstanding year for our company

revenue growth, cash generation, a successful acquisition,

by any measure.  

■ Record  revenues of  $135.6  million  (The  prior

year’s  record  was  beaten  by  the  end  of  the  third

quarter of 2001.)

■ Record 

income from  continuing  operations  of

development  of  our  intellectual  property  portfolio,  and

progress  on  important  new  technologies  are  some  of  the

key  areas  where  our  people  did  an  outstanding  job  and

recorded significant successes during 2001.

$11.6 million.

Revenues  reached  a  record  $135.6  million,  a  39%

■ Record net income of $8.6 million.

■ Record  diluted  earnings per  share  from  continuing

increase  over  the  prior  year,  and  came  across  all  of  the

Company’s  product  lines.  In  addition,  we  added  a  new

operations of $0.58. 

business,  Greatbatch-Sierra,  in  June  of  2001.  Income

■ Record EBITDA of $36.0 million.

■ Successful secondary offering.

Institution of Six Sigma Quality Program.

■ Successful acquisition of Greatbatch-Sierra.

■ Established new Emerging Technologies business unit.

■ Development  of  exciting  new 

technologies  for

our new product pipeline.

■ Major  Research  &  Development facility  expansion

underway.

■ Twenty-five new patents granted.

from  continuing  operations  of  $11.6  million  represented

another  record,  and  was  $10.6  million  over  the  $1.0

million  of  2000.  This  substantial  improvement  was  due

both  to  sales  growth  and  margin  expansion  in  2001.  Net

profit  in  2001  produced  yet  another  record  of  $8.6

million,  or  $0.43  per  diluted  share,  compared  with  a  net

loss  of  $0.5  million  or  $0.04  cents  per  diluted  share  for

2000.  Earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and

amortization  (EBITDA)  increased  by  37%  in  2001  to  a

record $36.0 million. This increase reflects our continued

strong  cash  flow  from  our  focus  on  operations  and

■ Named  by  RED  HERRING  MAGAZINE  in  2001  as

one of the top 25 technology IPOs of 2000.

working capital management.  

3

l

e

t

t

e

r

t

o

s

h

a

r

e

h

o

l

d

e

r

s

 
 
■
■
4

s

r

e

d

l

o

h

e

r

a

h

s

o

t

r

e

t

t

e

l

Due in part to our secondary offering and primary share

thrive  by  resting  on  its  laurels.  We  know  that  our

placement in July of 2001, our strengthened balance sheet

strategic  imperative  is  to  reinvent  ourselves  as  advances

gives  us  the  means  to  reinforce  our  strategic  profile

in  medical  technologies  provide  new  approaches  to

through acquisitions or other investments that will extend

therapy  for  millions  of  people  worldwide.  So,  our  third

our  existing  business,  broaden  our  customer  base,  and

growth  area  will  come  from  participation  in  emerging

expand our product lines into adjacent and higher value-

medical device markets like hearing assist, artificial heart

added  markets. The  result  is  that  we  head  into  2002  and

and  left  ventricular  assist  devices  which  will  address

beyond with a platform for growth that has been greatly

these new therapeutic approaches.

strengthened by our successes.  

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Looking ahead, our opportunities have never been greater.

Our  core  medical  market,  cardiac  rhythm  management

Over  the  next  few  years,  substantial  growth  will  come

(CRM), is poised for new growth at a time when we are

from  three  areas.  First,  recently  completed  clinical

confident that we can continue to bring new products and

trials  have  conclusively  demonstrated  the  benefits  of

implantable electronic devices for patients with congestive

heart  failure,  a  degenerative  disease  that  is  the  number

one  cause  of  hospitalizations  in  the  United  States.  Our

implantable power components (batteries and capacitors)

will  ride  this  wave  over  the  next  three  to  five  years.

Second,  there  is  an  accelerating  trend  on  the  part  of

regulatory  agencies  to  require  that  implantable  medical

electronics  be  protected  from  interference  from  devices

like  cell  phones  and  two-way  pagers.  Greatbatch-Sierra,

the  business  we  acquired  in  June  2001,  will  exploit  this

opportunity  through  its  proprietary  filtering  technology.

But looking a bit further into the future, we know that a

technology  company  like  Wilson  Greatbatch  cannot

(in millions)
$150

125

100

75

50

25

0

(in millions)
$70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

r e v e n u e s

135.6

77.4

79.2

97.8

57.7

1997(a)

1998            1999            2000        

2001

g r o s s   p r o f i t

60.9

40.9

38.2

42.3

30.5

1997(a)   

1998            1999             2000           2001

(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

 
 
■
enabling  technologies  to  market  and  raise  the  industry

recover  and  the  effects  of  the  longer-term  oil  and  gas

benchmark for product performance and quality.  

reserve depletion cycle become apparent.

Longer  term,  we  have  opportunities  in  new,  but  closely

WGT QUALITY

allied, implantable medical devices with applications, for

For more than 31 years, we have nurtured a culture that is

example, in neurophysiology, drug infusion, and otology.

focused on quality.  This year, by implementing the tools

These markets and technologies will be developed as we

and disciplines of "Six SigmaTM," a scientific methodology

go  forward  into  the  future. At  the  same  time,  petroleum

of  measuring,  analyzing,  improving,  and  controlling

and  natural  gas  exploration  and  production  from  which

every process, we will take quality to a new level at WGT.

we derive approximately 20% of our revenues, is expected

Training is essential to the successful implementation of

to maintain its growth once the world economy begins to

a  Six  Sigma  Quality  Program.  Every  employee  at  WGT

(in millions)
$40

30

20

10

0

20.5

22.2

12.3

has been trained in continuous improvement quality tools.

E B I T D A

36.0

Additionally,  we  are  making  the  investment  in  training

approximately  150  "Green  Belts"  and  "Black  Belts"  that

26.3

will  lead  projects,  mentor,  and  broaden  the  involvement

in  this  initiative  throughout  the  organization.  Our  initial

focus  will  be  on  projects  that  reduce  variability  and

1997(a)

1998          1999            2000           2001

improve  efficiency  in  our  internal  organization. We  will

EBITDA - earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

then  move  the  focus  to  "Designing  for  Six  Sigma"  to

ensure  that,  from  the  start,  our  customers  get  what  they

d e b t   & e q u i t y

want, when they want it. Our leaders at every level of WGT

74.0

188.8

recognize  the  importance  of  Six  Sigma  quality  to  our

future. The Six Sigma initiative will drive rigorous process

discipline and a relentless focus on customer satisfaction.

(in millions)
$275

250

225

200

175

150

125

100

75

50

25

0

130.7

132.4

33.6

135.8

70.9

28.2

45.6

46.4

1997

1998            1999            2000            2001

OUR PRODUCTS/MARKETS

Medical  power,  our  largest  traditional  business,  includes

batteries  and  power  capacitors  for  implantable  medical

devices. Our original end-use market, bradycardia pacing,

Six SigmaTM is a trademark of Motorola, Inc.

5

l

e

t

t

e

r

t

o

s

h

a

r

e

h

o

l

d

e

r

s

 
 
■
6

s

r

e

d

l

o

h

e

r

a

h

s

o

t

r

e

t

t

e

l

where we have sold  lithium iodine batteries for over 25

technologies  that  will  enable  our  customers  to  develop

years,  is  considered  a  mature  market  and  will  provide

ever more powerful solutions to these medical challenges

single  digit  growth  rates.  However,  the  power  source

in smaller packages.

market for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs),

As  a  result  of  this  year’s  successful  acquisition  of

where  we  sell  our  high-value-added  silver  vanadium

Greatbatch-Sierra,  our  Medical  Components  group  will

oxide (SVO) technology cells, has been growing at a 15%

benefit from the rapidly growing market for electromag-

to 20% pace since 1985. Our growth in the ICD market-

netic interference (EMI) protection of implantable medical

place  is  expected  to  be  driven  by  demographics  and  the

devices. Accelerated acceptance of ICDs will provide an

broadening  of  patient  groups  who  will  be  eligible  to

added  layer  of  growth  for  both  our  Greatbatch-Hittman

receive  ICDs  for  new  treatment  of  an  expanding  list  of

and  Greatbatch-Sierra  divisions.  Electromagnetic  inter-

indications.  The  MADIT  II  study,  concluded  in  2001,

ference  filtering  is  an  emerging  technology  driven  by  a

showed that two very large, new populations could benefit

market shift that is expected to require protection for all

from  ICDs  today,  but  do  not  yet  receive  them. The  first,

implantable electronics in order to make them immune to

patients suffering from the most severe forms of congestive

interference  from  cell  phones,  two-way  pagers  and  the

heart  failure  (CHF),  will  have  the  largest  impact  on  our

like. This perspective brought us to our strategic decision

battery revenues when they begin to receive implants over

to acquire Greatbatch-Sierra in June of 2001. Greatbatch-

the next few years. Another opportunity is the potentially

Sierra brought significant intellectual property in filtering

large number of asymptomatic patients who could benefit

feedthroughs  for  ICDs,  as  well  as  enabling  technology

from  an  ICD  to  protect  them  in  the  event  of  myocardial

currently under development at Greatbatch-Hittman, that

infarction  or  sudden  cardiac  death,  but  who  have  not

received  devices  to  date.  Our  implantable  battery,

(in millions)
$15

R D & E   e x p e n s e s

capacitor, and filtered feedthrough products should benefit

12.2

12.6

from the combined growth of these indications, realizing

compound annual revenue growths at double-digit levels.

Beyond today’s products, we will  protect and expand our

opportunities  by  introducing  improved  ICD  battery

10

5

0

9.0

9.3

9.9

1997(a)    

1998            1999            2000           2001

(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

 
 
■
will integrate the filtered capacitor with the feedthrough

and  engineering.  Many  of  the  business  opportunities  we

resulting in a single assembly with lower cost and better

envision will depend upon the successful development of

performance than the current hybrid. Building on a base of

the  new  products  and  processes  being  pursued  by  our

business  as  a  supplier  of  critical  components  and

Research & Development group. In 2001, we broke ground

assemblies  to  the  CRM  market,  Engineered  Components

on a state-of-the-art $4.5 million Research & Development

will  continue  to  develop  new  products  and  add  value

addition  to  house  our  growing  R&D  Group  effort.

through  a  higher  level  of  assemblies.  Our  Electrochem

Occupancy  is  scheduled  for  May  2002.  The  collective

business  provides  enabling  technologies  to  demanding

imagination and creativity of the members of our techni-

markets where the price of failure far exceeds the price of

cal staff produced a record of 25 granted patents in 2001.

the battery, like petroleum exploration and space flight. 

We  ended  2001  with  enormous  confidence  in  the  future

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

of  our  Company.  Confidence  in  our  destiny  to  continue

While significant new directions are being shaped by the

and  lead  change,  seize  opportunities  and  grow  our

activities  of  our  established  business  units,  we  have

Company,  confidence  in  our  quality  and  technologies  to

recognized the need to find additional opportunities that

enable  solutions  and  solve  problems  and  confidence  in

spring  from  our  existing  markets  and  established

our  people  who  are  benefiting  from  the  development  of

technical competencies. This recognition has led us to the

leaders at every level of our organization. Our challenge

creation  of  a  new  business  unit  within WGT,  designated

will  be  to  continue  to  focus  on  our  customers  and  key

Emerging Technologies.  Emerging Technologies  currently

opportunities  while  leveraging  our  technology  and

includes  implantable  drug  pumps  and  rechargeable

quality leadership to continue our successes. The coming

lithium-ion  battery  technology  for  implantable  devices,

year  and  beyond  offers  a  time  of  great  challenge  and

such  as  in  hearing-assist,  artif icial  heart,  and  left

excitement for everyone at WGT. It is a privilege for me

ventricular assist devices.

to  lead  your  Company  at  this  important  time.  I  look

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

forward to sharing our exciting future with you.

We  now  employ  about  200  scientists,  engineers  and

Sincerely,

technicians who are dedicated to the full time advancement

of our enabling technologies. On average, we spend over

10%  of  sales  revenue  yearly  on  research,  development

Edward F. Voboril
Chairman, President and CEO
March 11, 2002

7

l

e

t

t

e

r

t

o

s

h

a

r

e

h

o

l

d

e

r

s

 
 
■
y

g

o

l

o

n

h

c

e

t

l

a

c

i

d

e

m

e n a b l

i n g  

t e c h n o l o g i e s

t o   p r o v i d e   a   b e t t e r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e

e n •a¯´bl´i n g

 
Wilson Greatbatch Technologies,

Inc.  (WGT)  has  developed

enabling technologies which are

The world smallest pacemaker,
a pediatric model powered by
a WGT battery.

applications...pacemakers  and

defibrillators.  The  pacemaker

market  continues  to  represent

presently used to power over 90% of the world’s pacemakers

steady growth, in part based upon the predictable needs of

and  defibrillators  –  it  is  that  fundamental  statement that

an aging population. More potential growth exists on the

best embodies our commitment to providing the enabling

defibrillator  side,  however,  as  advances  continue  to  be

technologies  that,  in  turn,  enhance  and  provide  life  for

made  in  that  technology.  Even  more  exciting  is  Wilson

millions  worldwide.  For  a  large  part  of  our  corporate

Greatbatch’s  development  of  new  battery  products  for

history, it was the WGT power cell that almost exclusively

new cardiac rhythm management devices.

defined our contribution to the implantable cardiac rhythm

Our customers, the device manufacturers, continue to add

management  (CRM)  device  industry.  And  while  battery

features  such  as  remote  telemetry  capability  to  their

sales still represent 35% of our total revenue, our presence

products that demand more sophisticated power sources.

within  CRM  devices  has  grown  tremendously.  Batteries,

We  are  driven  to  provide  enabling  technical  solutions  to

capacitors,  electromagnetic  interference  (EMI)  filtered

meet  or  exceed  our  customers’ requirements  in  smaller,

feed-throughs,  leads,  distal  eluting  tips,  biocompatible

uniquely shaped packages containing increasingly higher

coatings,  terminal  blocks  and  molded  headers  are  all

energy  densities.  Our  company  meets  these  significant

examples  of WGT  products  that  are  enabling  significant

challenges  with  industry  leading  innovative  technical

device size reduction while enhancing device performance.

approaches  involving  new  chemistries,  folded  cathode

IMPLANTABLE POWER SOURCES

configurations,  novel  form  factors  (allowing  custom

The  traditional  high-tech  power  cell  segment  of  the

shapes  to  more  efficiently  fit  into  devices)  and  new  and

Implantable Power Sources (IPS) business remains a robust

sophisticated cathode/barrier fabrication techniques.

growth engine that posted record 2001 revenues of $46.9

IMPLANTABLE CAPACITORS

million  representing  a  13%  increase  over  2000  sales.

Closely  related  in  function  to  our  batteries,  as  energy

These  sales  were  driven  by  two  main  medical  product

storage  devices,  are  our  new  implantable  wet  tantalum

9

m

e

d

i

c

a

l

t

e

c

h

n

o

l

o

g

y

 
■
10

y

g

o

l

o

n

h

c

e

t

l

a

c

i

d

e

m

Novel form batteries, capacitors 
and EMI filtered feedthroughs.

capacitors.  The  implantable

capacitor  business  has  now

evolved  from  a  pilot/prototype

operation  to  a  full  commercial

entity. This  product  also  bene-

fits  from  a  synergy  with  our

the  implantable  valve,  which

precisely delivers fluid in pain

management  cases  (helping

patients  with  chronic  back

pain, cancer and spinal injury.)

These  are 

truly  enabling

traditional business, leveraging new battery technologies

technologies in every sense – not only making the device

and  designs,  to  create  capacitors  in  unique,  customer

manufacture  possible,  but  enabling  people  to  live  fuller,

proprietary  shapes  that  most  efficiently  fill  the  limited

richer and potentially longer lives. Our ongoing commit-

spaces inside a CRM device.

ment  to  the  components  business  will  mean  continually

MEDICAL COMPONENTS

Significant  news  in  the  components  segment  of  our

business  this  year  was  the  acquisition  of  what  is  now

known  as  Greatbatch-Sierra.  This  valuable  addition  to

our  company  provides  still  another  portal  of  enabling

technologies to offer comprehensive, integrated, solution-

driven  resources  to  our  device  customers.  Our  Medical

Components  Group  represented  by  Greatbatch-Sierra,

Greatbatch-Hittman 

and  Engineered  Components

amounted to 30% of total revenue in 2001. It is important

to  note,  however,  that  future  performance  will  not  only

come  from  what  we  regard  as  traditional  component

sales, but also from involvement in exciting new projects.

Some  of  these  products  include  the  Left  Ventricular

upgrading  capital  equipment  and  processes  to  enhance

production. At the same time we will be shifting to more

sub-assembly work, where we have the opportunity to add

(in millions)

$110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

m e d i c a l   r e v e n u e s

46.9

20.3

40.5

41.3

12.6

29.9

40.5

50.3

2.3
26.4

0.1
14.0

40.2

5.7

1997(a)

1998            1999            2000        

2001

Assist  Device  (LVAD),  the  insulin  delivery  pump,  and

Power Sources     ■

Capacitors     ■

Components

(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   p r o v i d e   a   b e t t e r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e

 
■
■
significant additional value

for  customers.  Planned

manufacturing  enhance-

ments will include increas-

ing  clean-room  capability,

This one piece molded pacemaker 
header illustrates an Engineered
Components’ sub-assembly.

a  10-20%  increase  in

longevity  over  existing

systems.  New  Research

&  Development  labs  are

presently  being  built

hybrid  molding  and  glass-to-metal  seal  fabrication

and  will  be  occupied  in  Spring  2002,  but  perhaps  the

(focused on increasing our capabilities and throughput).

most  telling  indicators  of  our  R&D  strength  are  the  25

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

patents granted to WGT in 2001 and the 85 patents in the

Driving  much  of  the  technological  growth  we’re  seeing

last  5  years.  All  of  our  aforementioned  capabilities,

in  so  many  areas  is,  of  course,  our  Research  &

unified  with  cutting  edge  "best  practices"  Six  Sigma

Development program. Current projects in R&D include

quality  management  and  a  continually  enhanced

exciting work with lithium-ion rechargeable batteries for

Information  Technologies  (IT)  effort  assure  that  Wilson

LVAD  and  artif icial  heart  use  (WGT  batteries  are 

Greatbatch  Technologies,  Inc.  and  its  people  will

powering  the  headline-making  Abiomed  artificial  heart,

continue  our  tradition  of  providing  the  cutting  edge,

as well as the Jarvik LVAD). New batteries for defibrilla-

industry  leading  enabling  technologies  needed  by  our

tors  and  congestive  heart  failure  (CHF)  devices  are  also

customers and, in turn, their patients.

under active investigation having the potential to provide

m e d i c a l   s e g m e n t   i n c o m e
f r o m   o p e r a t i o n s

39.0

28.9

29.0

30.0

23.2

n e w   p a t e n t s   g r a n t e d

25

23

13

13

30

20

10

11

0

1997(a)

1998          1999            2000           2001

1997            1998          1999            2000           2001

(in millions)
$40

30

20

10

0

(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

11

m

e

d

i

c

a

l

t

e

c

h

n

o

l

o

g

y

 
■
y

g

o

l

o

n

h

c

e

t

l

a

i

c

r

e

m

m

o

c

e n a b l

i n g  

t e c h n o l o g i e s

t o   a p p l y   t e c h n o l o g y   t o   g r e a t e r   c h a l l e n g e s

e n •a¯´bl´i n g

 
2001  was  an  important  year

for  Electrochem,  WGT’s

Commercial  Battery  business

unit.  Revenues 

for  2001

Electrochem’s batteries are as 
diverse in configuration as they 
are in their application.

customers. This  is  particularly

important to our customers for

whom  our  batteries  serve  as

critical  components  in  large

exceeded  $27.9  million.  The  acquisition  of  Battery

and  complex  processes  and  operations.  The 

two

Engineering,  Inc.  (now  Electrochem-Canton)  in  August

facilities  assure  a  continuous  supply  of  batteries  and

2000,  was  perfectly  timed  to  take  advantage  of  the

that,  in  turn,  offers  a  huge  advantage  over  almost  all  of

significant  increase  in  battery  demand  from  our  oilfield

our competitors.

services  customers.  The  continuing  integration  of  the

Our  new  Super-D  cell,  another  outstanding  example  of

Canton  product  line  and  related  production  capability

our enabling technology, also played an important part in

into  Electrochem  has  progressed  well  in  2001.  Some

our 2001 story as it passed critical tests in the important

products  have  been  consolidated  with  the  existing

Marine  Seismic  market  and  rewarded  our  efforts  with

Electrochem  product  line  and  new  products  are  in

significant new orders.  A new supply agreement with our

development  that  will  provide  enabling  solutions  to  our

largest  customer  for  pipeline  inspection  gauge  batteries

customers and are expected to open market segments not

continues  our  leadership  in  this  important  and  growing

traditionally  served  by  Electrochem.  The  strategic

segment. Additionally, Electrochem is presently engaged

initiative  to  increase  Electrochem’s  share  of  the  value-

in  the  intensive  process  of  becoming  our  largest

added  pack  business  was  implemented  this  year  by

Commercial customer’s first certified supplier. This again

qualifying Electrochem-built battery packs for a number

is evidence of the confidence shown in Electrochem when

of key customers in the oilfield services industry.

the  requirement  demands  remote  power  supplies  for

Electrochem’s position and value in the marketplace was

critical  applications  and/or  demanding  environments.

further  enhanced  with  the  addition  of  Electrochem-

Additionally,  new  supply  agreements  with  two  key

Canton,  since  the  two  independent  operating  facilities

customers  resulted  in  a  significant  increase  in  business

inherently  address  security  of  supply  concerns  of

in the second half of 2001.  

13

c

o

m

m

e

r

c

i

a

l

t

e

c

h

n

o

l

o

g

y

 
■
14

y

g

o

l

o

n

h

c

e

t

l

a

i

c

r

e

m

m

o

c

Battery packs offer dependable 
power in challenging environments.

On  the  Electrochem  manufac-

turing  side  of 

the  story,

significant process and systems

improvements,  as  well  as  new

Six  Sigma  quality  initiatives

have  improved  productivity

Electrochem not only provides

sales  and  service  support

through  our  world-wide  net-

work  of  qualified  distributors,

but 

additionally 

provides

customers  with 

specif ic

and  at  the  same  time  reduced  waste.  Enhancements  to

applications  engineering,  technical  support,  on-site

existing    manufacturing  technologies  have  significantly

safety  training,  dock-to-stock  programs  and  custom

increased  throughput  and  shortened  delivery  times.

engineered and manufactured products.

Concurrently, on-time shipments are a top priority, again

Throughout  our  markets,  Electrochem’s  brand  name  is

demonstrating  our  commitment  to  customer  satisfaction.

synonymous  with  enabling  technologies,  customized

The  high  level  of  attention  paid  to  continuous  improve-

solutions,  and  the  highest  quality,  highest  reliability

ment is evident not only in our product but becomes more

power  sources  available.  With 

the  addition  of

and  more  important  in  our  service  to  the  market.

Electrochem-Canton,  we  expect 

to 

leverage 

that

Competition  is  keen  and  we  work  hard  to  position  our

reputation  into  new  and  exciting  applications  that  will

services ahead of that competition through the quality of

enhance  revenues,  and  allow  us  to  diversify  into  new

our  product  as  well  as  our  service  capabilities.

segments of existing markets.

(in millions)
$30

25

20

15

10

5

0

c o m m e r c i a l   r e v e n u e s

27.9

12.9

11.8

10.0

14.0

c o m m e r c i a l   s e g m e n t   i n c o m e
f r o m   o p e r a t i o n s

8.8

4.2

4.3

3.5

2.7

(in millions)
$9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

1997(a)

1998            1999             2000           2001

1997(a)

1998          1999            2000           2001

(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

(a) See note (a) to Financial Highlights on page 1.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   a p p l y   t e c h n o l o g y   t o   g r e a t e r   c h a l l e n g e s

 
■
S E L E C T E D C O N S O L I D A T E D

F I N A N C I A L D A T A

Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc.

Wilson 

Greatbatch Ltd.(1)

July 11, 1997 to

January 1, 1997

December 28, 2001(4) December 29, 2000(3) December 31, 1999

January 1, 1999(2)

January 2, 1998

to July 10, 1997

$ 135,575

$   97,790

$   79,235

$   77,361

$   27,193

$   30,468

(In thousands, except per share data)

Years / periods ended

Revenues

Cost of goods sold

Gross profit

Selling, general and administrative

Research, development and engineering, net

Intangible amortization

Transaction related expenses

Write-off of purchased in-process 

research, development and engineering

Interest expense, net

Other

Income (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary

loss and cumulative effect of accounting change

18,530

Income tax expense (benefit)(5)

Extraordinary loss on retirement of debt

Cumulative effect of accounting change

6,939

(2,994)

—

74,716

60,859

18,174

12,575

7,726

—

—

22,384

3,588

266

$      0.44

$      0.43

19,563

19,945

Net earnings (loss) per share(6)

Basic

Diluted

Weighted average shares outstanding(6)

Basic

Diluted

Financial position at year end:

Total assets

Long-term obligations

Total liabilities

Total stockholders’ equity

55,446

42,344

11,473

9,941

6,530

—

—

14,400

12,958

(189)

1,631

611

(1,568)

—

41,057

38,178

9,880

9,339

6,510

—

—

12,449

13,420

1,343

36,454

40,907

11,484

12,190

5,197

—

—

12,036

10,572

364

12,241

14,952

5,412

4,619

1,810

—

14,922

15,546

6,729

4,400

—

11,097

23,779

—

(20,668)                

(6,680)

4,128

74

(2,314)

1,100 

(24,870)

(605)

—

(563)

410

—

—

(9,468)

—

—

$     (0.04)                 $

(0.18)

$      0.07

$

(1.74)             $ 

(874)

$     (0.04)                 $  

(0.18)

$      0.06

$     (1.74)             $   

(874)

14,167

14,434

12,491

12,491

10,461

10,677

8,855

8,855

252

(117)

(6,815)

1,053

—

—

9

9

NA

NA

NA

NA

$ 283,520

$ 181,647

$ 189,779

$ 194,390

$ 111,709

61,397

94,676

188,844

30,951

45,813

135,834

127,623

143,372

46,407

129,563

148,795

45,595

72,714

83,470

28,239

Net income (loss)

$

8,597

$      (548)                  $   (2,272)

$       690

$ (15,402)             $

(7,868)

(1) The financial data for periods prior to July 11, 1997 relate to Wilson Greatbatch Ltd., our predecessor.

(2) In August 1998, we acquired the assets and liabilities of Greatbatch-Hittman. These figures include the results of operations of Greatbatch-Hittman from August 8, 1998 to January 1, 1999. 

(3) In August 2000, we acquired the capital stock of Battery Engineering, Inc. (BEI). These figures include the results of operations of BEI from August 4, 2000 to December 29, 2000.

(4) In June 2001, we acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Greatbatch-Sierra. These figures include the results of operations of Greatbatch-Sierra from June 18, 2001 to December 28, 2001.

(5) Wilson Greatbatch Ltd., our predecessor, incurred minimal state taxes as a former subchapter S corporation. The federal and state taxes for the period from January 1, 1997 to July 10, 1997 are directly attributable to our acquisition of our predecessor in July 1997. 

(6) We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. We calculate diluted earnings (loss) per share by adjusting for common stock equivalents, which 

consist of stock options. During the period from July 11, 1997 to January 2, 1998 and the year ended December 31, 1999, 0 and 0.2 million shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so 

would be antidilutive for those periods. Diluted earnings per share for all other periods include the potentially dilutive effect of stock options. 

15

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

d

a

t

a

 
■
16

s

i

s

y

l

a

n

a

&

n

o

i

s

s

u

c

s

i

d

s
’

t

n

e

m

e

g

a

n

a

m

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our implantable power source revenues are derived from

We  are  a  leading  developer  and  manufacturer  of  power

sales of batteries for pacemakers, implantable cardioverter

sources,  feedthroughs  and  wet  tantalum  capacitors  used

defibrillators  (ICDs)  and  other  implantable  medical

in  implantable  medical  devices.  We  also  develop  and

devices.  We  also  record  royalties  as  implantable  power

manufacture other precision-engineered components used

source revenues for licenses we have granted to others for

in  implantable  medical  devices.  We  leverage  our  core

the manufacture of batteries using designs and processes

competencies in technology and manufacturing to develop

patented  by  us.  Our  capacitor  revenues  are  derived  from

and  produce  power  sources  for  commercial  applications

sales of our wet tantalum capacitors, which we developed

that  demand  high  performance  and  reliability.  These

for  use  in  ICDs.  Our  component  revenues  are  derived

applications  include  aerospace,  oil  and  gas  exploration

from  sales  of  feedthroughs,  electrodes,  electromagnetic

and oceanographic equipment.

interference (EMI) filters and other precision components

In  June  2001,  we  acquired  substantially  all  of  the  assets

of  the  Sierra-KD  Components  division  of  Maxwell

Technologies,  Inc.  (Greatbatch-Sierra),  a  developer  and

manufacturer  of  electromagnetic  interference  filters  and

capacitors primarily for implantable medical devices, for

$49.0 million in cash and certain assumed liabilities. The

acquisition  was  accounted  for  as  a  purchase. The  excess

principally  used  in  pacemakers  and  ICDs.  We  also  sell

our  components  for  use  in  other  implantable  medical

devices.  Our  commercial  power  sources  revenues  are

derived primarily from sales of batteries for use in oil and

gas exploration. We also supply batteries to NASA for its

space  shuttle  program  and  other  similarly  demanding

commercial applications.

of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets

A  substantial  part  of  our  business  is  conducted  with  a

acquired was recorded as goodwill.

limited number of customers. Our two largest customers

In  July  2001,  we  completed  a  stock  offering  of  7.8

million shares of common stock, comprised of 5.8 million

shares  sold  by  existing  shareholders  and  2.0  million

newly  issued  shares.  The  Company  received  $43.6

million  in  net  proceeds  to  be  used  for  general  corporate

purposes, including acquisitions and debt reduction.  

We  derive  revenues  from  the  sale  of  medical  and

commercial  products.  Our  medical  revenues  consist  of

sales  of  implantable  power  sources,  capacitors  and

components. Our commercial revenues consist of sales of

commercial power sources. 

accounted for approximately 66% of revenues in 2001. We

have entered into long-term supply agreements with most

of  our  large  customers.  For  each  of  our  products,  we

recognize revenue when the products are shipped and title

passes.  We  do  not  give  warranties  to  our  customers  for

our products and to date, returns have been immaterial. 

Cost  of  goods  sold  includes  materials,  labor  and  other

manufacturing costs associated with the products we sell.

Selling,  general,  and  administrative  expenses  include

salaries, facility costs, professional service fees, and patent-

related and other legal expenses. Research, development,

and  engineering  costs  include  expenses  associated  with

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

 
 
 
■
the  design,  development,  testing,  deployment  and

a $10.6 million, or 36%, increase from $29.9 million for

enhancement of our products. We record cost reimburse-

2000. This  increase  was  primarily  due  to  the  acquisition

ments received for research, development and engineering

of  Greatbatch-Sierra  in  June  2001,  whose  primary

conducted on behalf of customers as an offset to research,

product  line  of  EMI  filters  for  implantable  devices

development and engineering expenses.

complements our other component lines well.

Our fiscal year ends on the closest Friday to December 31.

Commercial:  Commercial  power  sources  revenues

Accordingly, our fiscal year will periodically contain more

increased 99% to $27.9 million compared to $14.0 million

or less than 365 days. For example, fiscal 1999 ended on

for 2000. The higher revenues were primarily related to the

December 31, 1999, fiscal 2000 ended December 29, 2000

inclusion  of  revenues  for  a  full  year  from  our  Battery

and  fiscal  2001  ended  on  December  28,  2001.  Our  fiscal

Engineering, Inc. (BEI) acquisition that was completed in

quarters  are  three-month  periods  that  end  on  the  Friday

August  2000.  This  acquisition,  combined  with  our  pre-

closest to the end of the applicable calendar quarter.

existing  commercial  business,  allowed  us  to  participate

The  commentary  that  follows  should  be  read  in

strongly in the increased demand for products used in oil

conjunction  with  our  consolidated  financial  statements

and gas exploration activity, which was up sharply in 2001.

and related notes.

Gross  profit  for  2001  was  $60.9  million,  an  $18.5

Fiscal 2001 compared with Fiscal 2000

Total  revenues  for  2001  were  $135.6  million,  a  $37.8

million, or 39%, increase from $97.8 million for 2000.

Medical:  Total  medical  revenues  for  2001  were  $107.7

million,  a  $23.9  million,  or  28%,  increase  from  $83.8

million for 2000.  Implantable power source revenues for

2001 were $46.9 million, a $5.6 million, or 13%, increase

from $41.3 million for 2000. This increase was primarily

due  to  higher  demand  for  our  ICD  batteries  from  our

customers, both foreign and domestic. This increase was

partially offset due to the expiration of implantable power

source  patents  in  2001  on  which  we  had  been  receiving

royalty  fees.  Capacitor  revenues  for  2001  were  $20.3

million, a $7.7 million or 61% increase from $12.6 million

for  2000.  This  increase  was  primarily  due  to  market

acceptance and demand for the ICDs using our capacitor,

which was first introduced in the fourth quarter of 1999.

Medical component revenues for 2001 were $40.5 million,

million, or 44%, increase from $42.3 million for 2000. As

a  percentage  of  total  revenues,  gross  profit  for  2001

improved  to  45%  from  43%  for  2000. This  increase  was

primarily due to increased efficiencies and cost leveraging

based  on  the  higher  production  volumes  in  2001  over

2000. In addition, the absence in 2001 of significant start-

up  costs  that  accompanied  the  ramp-up  of  capacitors  to

production volumes in 2000 further aided the comparison.

Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  for  2001

were $18.2 million, a $6.7 million, or 58%, increase from

$11.5 million in 2000. The increase in selling, general and

administrative expenses was due to the inclusion of such

expenses  from  Greatbatch-Sierra  since  its  acquisition  in

June  2001,  a  full  year  of  expenses  from  BEI  in  2001

versus  only  five  months  in  2000,  a  full  year  of  "public

company"  expenses  (annual  stock  listing  and  registrar

fees,  investor  relation  expenses,  etc),  and  increased

training costs in support of our adoption of a Six Sigma

17

m

a

n

a

g

e

m

e

n

t

’
s

d

i

s

c

u

s

s

i

o

n

&

a

n

a

l

y

s

i

s

 
 
 
■
18

s

i

s

y

l

a

n

a

&

n

o

i

s

s

u

c

s

i

d

s
’

t

n

e

m

e

g

a

n

a

m

quality  initiative.  As  a  percentage  of  total  revenues,

were  used  to  prepay  $84.0  million  of  our  senior  debt  in

selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  were  13%

October 2000. The remaining debt was refinanced during

and 12% in 2001 and 2000, respectively. 

the  first  quarter  of  2001  at  more  favorable  terms.  An

Research,  development  and  engineering  costs  for

additional  $47.0  million  was  borrowed  in  June  2001  to

2001 were $12.6 million, a $2.6 million, or 26%, increase

finance our acquisition of Greatbatch-Sierra. Net interest

from  $9.9  million  in  2000.  Payments  received  from

expense included interest income of $0.4 million in 2001,

customers  for  the  development  of  proprietary  products

an increase of $0.1 million, or 33% from interest income

are  recorded  as  an  offset  to  research,  development  and

of $0.3 million in 2000. This increase reflected incremen-

engineering  costs.  Such  payments 

totaled  $2.5

tal income earned on the investment of proceeds from our

million and $3.2 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

secondary stock offering in July 2001.

The  increase  in  net  costs  reflects  our  acquisitions  of

Other expense of $0.3 million in 2001 compares with other

Greatbatch-Sierra and BEI as discussed above, as well as

income of $0.2 million in 2000.  Losses on disposition of

our ongoing commitment to invest in the development of

assets  and  additions  to  our  allowance  for  doubtful

new  products  and  enhancing  the  performance  of  our

accounts  comprise  the  majority  of  the  balance  in  2001.

existing  products.  As  a  percentage  of  total  revenues,

These recurring items were offset in 2000, when we sold,

research,  development  and  engineering  costs  (before

for  a  gain,  interest  rate  cap  agreements  which  were  no

development  payments  received  from  customers)  were

longer needed due to the prepayment of our senior debt. 

11%  in  2001,  as  compared  to  13%  in  2000.  This

Our  effective  tax  rate  decreased  slightly  to  37.4%  for

decrease  was  primarily  due  to  the  rapid  growth  in

2001 from 37.5% for 2000. Our rate includes the effect of

capacitor  and  commercial  revenues  in  2001,  and  not  to

all state taxes and available credits.

any decrease in our research and development initiatives. 

As  discussed  above,  the  senior  debt  and  subordinated

Intangible  amortization  was  $7.7  million  for  2001,  an

debt  that  remained  outstanding  at  year  end  2000  was

increase  of  $1.2  million,  or  18%  from  $6.5  million  in

refinanced  in  the  first  quarter  2001.  This  transaction

2000. This increase primarily reflects the amortization of

resulted  in  an  extraordinary  charge,  net  of  tax,  of  $3.0

intangible  assets  that  were  recorded  as  part  of  our

million. The charge related to the call premium and write-

acquisition of Greatbatch-Sierra. 

off  of  fees  and  other  expenses  incurred  to  establish  the

Net interest expense for 2001 was $3.6 million, a decrease

original debt financing. The extraordinary charge, net of

of  $9.4  million,  or  72%,  from  $13.0  million  for  2000.

tax, recorded in 2000 as a result of that year’s prepayment

Gross  interest  expense  in  2001  was  $4.0  million,  a

of  debt  with  proceeds  from  our  initial  public  offering

decrease  of  $9.2  million,  or  70%,  from  $13.2  million  in

totaled $1.6 million.

2000. Proceeds from our fall 2000 initial public offering

Our  net  income  for  2001  amounted  to  $8.6  million,  up

from a net loss of $(0.5) million in 2000. This improvement

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   p r o v i d e   a   b e t t e r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e

 
 
 
■
was primarily due to the decrease in interest expense and

of components in 2000 when compared with 1999.

the  increase  in  gross  profit.  The  net  earnings  per  share

Commercial:  Commercial  power  sources  revenues

was $0.43 for 2001, assuming dilution, as compared with

increased 40% to $14.0 million compared to $10.0 million

a loss per share of $(0.04) for 2000.

for  1999. The  higher  revenues  were  primarily  related  to

Fiscal 2000 compared with Fiscal 1999

the  inclusion  of  revenues  from  the  BEI  acquisition  that

Total  revenues  for  2000  were  $97.8  million,  an  $18.6

was completed in August 2000. 

million, or 23%, increase from $79.2 million for 1999. The

Gross profit for 2000 was $42.3 million, a $4.2 million,

growth in revenues was primarily due to sales of our line of

or  11%,  increase  from  $38.2  million  for  1999.  As  a

wet  tantalum  capacitors,  which  were  launched  commer-

percentage  of  total  revenues,  gross  profit  for  2000

cially  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  1999,  and  the  inclusion  of

declined  to  43%  from  48%  for  1999.  This  decrease

revenues from BEI since its acquisition in August 2000.

was primarily due to a lower percentage of total revenues

Medical:  Total  medical  revenues  for  2000  were  $83.8

from established product lines such as implantable power

million,  a  $14.6  million,  or  21%,  increase  from  $69.2

sources,  with  no  accompanying  start-up  costs,  versus  a

million for 1999. Implantable power source revenues for

higher percentage of total revenues from newer products,

2000 were $41.3 million, a $0.8 million, or 2%, increase

with accompanying high start-up costs, such as capacitors.

from $40.5 million for 1999. This increase was primarily

In  addition,  sales  of  lower  margin  products,  such  as

due  to  higher  pacemaker  battery  sales  as  a  result  of  an

medical components and commercial power sources, have

increase  in  pacemaker  device  sales  by  our  customers,

increased  at  a  faster  rate  than  have  sales  of  historically

both  foreign  and  domestic.  This  increase  was  partially

higher margin implantable power sources.

offset due to an industry-wide design change in ICDs that

Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  for  2000

resulted  in  ICDs  using  one  battery  instead  of  two.  This

were $11.5 million, a $1.6 million, or 16%, increase from

conversion  began  in  mid-1999  and  was  substantially

$9.9 million in 1999. The increase in selling general and

complete by the third quarter of 2000. Capacitor revenues

administrative expenses was primarily due to the inclusion

for  2000  were  $12.6  million,  a  $10.3  million  increase

of  such  expenses  from  BEI  since  its  acquisition  in

from  $2.3  million  for  1999. This  increase  was  primarily

August  2000,  wage  increases  in  2000  as  compared  to

due  to  initial  commercial  sales  of  our  new  wet  tantalum

wage  decreases  in  1999  and  the  accrual  of  incentive

capacitors  beginning  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  1999.

compensation in 2000 whereas there were no such accruals

Medical  components  revenues  for  2000  were  $29.9

in 1999. As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general

million,  a  $3.5  million,  or  13%,  increase  from  $26.4

and  administrative  expenses  were  12%  and  13%  in

million  for  1999. This  increase  was  primarily  due  to  the

2000  and  1999,  respectively.  The  increase  in  total

sale  of  a  greater  number  of  implantable  medical  devices

revenues  mitigated  the  increase  in  selling,  general  and

by our customers, as well as our sales of a broader range

administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues.

19

m

a

n

a

g

e

m

e

n

t

’
s

d

i

s

c

u

s

s

i

o

n

&

a

n

a

l

y

s

i

s

 
 
 
■
20

s

i

s

y

l

a

n

a

&

n

o

i

s

s

u

c

s

i

d

s
’

t

n

e

m

e

g

a

n

a

m

Research,  development  and  engineering  expenses  for

In addition to the $84.0 million prepayment of our senior

2000  were  $9.9  million,  a  $0.6  million,  or  6%,  increase

debt  with  the  net  proceeds  of  our  initial  public  offering,

from  $9.3  million  for  1999.  Payments  received  from

we  redeemed  a  portion  of  our  subordinated  debt.  These

customers  for  the  development  of  proprietary  battery

two  transactions  resulted  in  an  extraordinary  charge,  net

models are recorded as an offset to research, development

of tax, of $1.6 million in 2000. The charge relates to the

and  engineering  expenses.  Such  payments  totaled  $3.2

write-off of fees and other expenses incurred to establish

million and $2.5 million in 2000 and 1999, respectively.

the original debt financing.

As a percentage of total revenues, research, development

Our  net  loss  for  2000  narrowed  to  $(0.5)  million  from  a

and engineering expenses before such payments for 2000

net  loss  of  $(2.3)  million  in  1999. The  reduction  in  net

declined  to  13%  from  15%  for  1999.  This  decrease

loss was primarily due to an increase in gross profit. The

was  primarily  due  to  the  rapid  growth  in  capacitor  sales

net  loss  per  share  was  $(0.04)  for  2000,  assuming

and  the  growth  in  revenues  of  products  that  historically

dilution, and $(0.18) for 1999.

have  not  required  significant  research,  development  and

engineering  expenses,  such  as  medical  components  and

commercial power sources. 

Intangible  amortization  was  $6.5  million  for  2000  and

1999. Net interest expense for 2000 was $13.0 million, a

decrease  of  $0.5  million,  or  3%,  from  $13.4  million  for

1999. This  decrease  was  due  to  the  use  of  net  proceeds

from our initial public offering to prepay $84.0 million of

our  senior  debt.  Net  interest  expense  includes  interest

income  of  $0.3  million  and  $0.2  million  in  2000  and

1999, respectively. Miscellaneous income of $0.2 million

in 2000 compares with miscellaneous expense of $1.3 mil-

lion in  1999.  In  2000,  we  sold  interest  rate  cap  agree-

ments,  which  were  no  longer  needed  due  to  the  prepay-

ment  of  our  senior  debt,  for  a  gain  of  $0.2  million.  In

1999, we wrote down by $0.9 million the carrying value

of our investment in an unaffiliated company.

Our  effective  tax  rate  increased  to  37.5%  for  2000  from

26.1%  for  1999.   This  increase  was  primarily  due  to  the

decrease  in  state  tax  credits  available  to  us  for  2000  as

compared with 1999.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The  ref inancing  of  our  then  remaining  senior  and

subordinated  debt  in  2001  at  more  favorable  terms,  and

the  receipt  of  $43.6  million  in  net  proceeds  from  our

secondary  offering  of  stock  in  July  2001  have  furthered

strengthened  our  f inancial  position.  Total  assets  at

December 28, 2001 grew to $283.5 million, reflecting the

common  stock  proceeds  and  our  acquisition  of  the  net

assets of Greatbatch-Sierra. 

Liquidity

As of December 28, 2001, we had $43.3 million in cash

and  cash  equivalents.  This  amount  primarily  reflected

the  proceeds  from  our  secondary  offering  of  common

stock  in  July  2001,  and  remains  available  for  general

corporate purposes, which may include debt reduction or

acquisitions.  Cashflow  from  operations  was  adequate  to

cover  all  required  debt  servicing,  capital  expenditures

and  normal  operational  costs.  In  addition,  we  have  a

$20.0  million  line  of  credit  facility,  all  of  which  was

available at year-end.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   a p p l y   t e c h n o l o g y   t o   g r e a t e r   c h a l l e n g e s

 
 
 
■
Cash provided by operating activities in 2001 was $21.5

regularly  scheduled  payments  of  $94.8  million  on  our

million  compared  to  $18.2  million  and  $9.0  million  in

senior  debt,  including  our  revolving  line  of  credit.  We

2000 and 1999, respectively. The increase in cash provided

redeemed $5.0 million of our 13% subordinated notes and

by  operating  activities  in  2001  when  compared  to  both

purchased $2.0 million of common stock from the holder

prior years was primarily due to an increase in operating

of the redeemed notes. In 2000, we also sold $3.0 million

income, which largely reflected improved gross profit and

of our stock to the previous owner of BEI and used these

decreased interest expense. This improvement was some-

proceeds to pay off the $2.7 million in debt we assumed in

what  tempered  by  increases  in  accounts  receivable  and

the  BEI  acquisition.  Cash  used  in  financing  activities  in

inventories, driven by an increased volume of business. 

1999 was primarily the result of ongoing operational debt

Cash  provided  by  operating  activities  improved  in  2000

and  equity  transactions,  and  an  earnout  payment  related

from 1999 levels primarily due to an increase in operating

to our acquisition of Greatbatch-Hittman.

income, the receipt of refunds from state tax credits and

We believe that cash generated from operations, combined

previously-paid income taxes and a reduction in net oper-

with  our  available  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  will  be

ating assets.

sufficient to meet our working capital needs and planned

Cash used in investing activities was $59.4 million, $3.4

capital expenditures for the near term. Capital expenditures

million  and  $8.8  million  for  2001,  2000  and  1999,

for  2002  are  expected  to  increase  from  historical  levels,

respectively. Our acquisition of Greatbatch-Sierra was the

as we invest in increased production capacity and product

most significant item in 2001, accounting for $46.9 mil-

development  opportunities.  These  investments  include

lion of the $59.4 million. Capital expenditures were $9.7

completion  of  an  expansion  to  our  research  and

million, $4.5 million and $8.5 million for 2001, 2000 and

development  facilities,  which  began  in  2001.  Should

1999, respectively. 

Cash  provided  by  financing  activities  was  $81.2  million

in 2001, compared with cash used in financing activities

of  $18.6  million  and  $0.4  million  in  2000  and  1999,

respectively.  In  January  2001,  we  consummated  a  $40.0

million  term  loan  to  pay  off  the  remaining  senior  and

subordinated  debt  outstanding  at  that  time,  including  a

other suitable investment opportunities arise during fiscal

2002, including acquisitions, we believe that our earnings,

cash  flows  and  balance  sheet  will  permit  us  to  obtain

additional debt or equity capital, if necessary. There can

be  no  assurance,  however,  that  additional  financing  will

be available to us or, if available, that it can be obtained

on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us.

call premium. An additional $47.0 million was borrowed

Capital Structure

in  June  2001  to  finance  the  acquisition  of  Greatbatch-

Our capital structure consists of interest-bearing debt and

Sierra.  In  July  2001,  we  received  $43.6  million  in  net

equity.  Interest-bearing  debt  as  a  percentage  of  our  total

proceeds from an offering of our common stock. In 2000,

capitalization  increased  to  28%  at  December  28,  2001

we used the proceeds from our initial public offering and

compared with 20% at December 29, 2000, primarily due

cash generated by operating activities to prepay or make

to the additional debt incurred to finance the acquisition

21

m

a

n

a

g

e

m

e

n

t

’
s

d

i

s

c

u

s

s

i

o

n

&

a

n

a

l

y

s

i

s

 
 
 
■
22

s

i

s

y

l

a

n

a

&

n

o

i

s

s

u

c

s

i

d

s
’

t

n

e

m

e

g

a

n

a

m

of Greatbatch-Sierra. The December 28, 2001 percentage

to  Earnings  Before  Interest,  Taxes,  Depreciation  and

of debt net of cash as a percentage of total capitalization

Amortization  (EBITDA),  as  it  is  defined  in  the  credit

was  12%.  Our  long-term  debt  at  December  28,  2001

agreement,  and  ratios  of  leverage,  interest  and  fixed

consisted of a term loan. There was also a $20.0 million

charges as they relate to EBITDA. Both the term loan and

revolving  line  of  credit  available,  none  of  which  was

the revolving line of credit bear interest at a rate that varies

outstanding at year-end.

with our level of leverage. At December 28, 2001 leverage

In January 2001, we consummated a $60.0 million credit

levels, the applicable interest rates for both the term loan

facility that consisted of a $40.0 million term loan and a

and revolving line of credit were prime less 0.75%, or the

$20.0 million revolving line of credit. Both the term loan

London  Interbank  Offered  Rate,  or  LIBOR,  plus  1.25%,

and  the  revolving  line  of  credit  had  a  term  of  five  years

at  our  option.  At  March  1,  2002,  the  weighted  average

and would have matured on January 1, 2006. We used the

interest  rate  for  the  term  loan  was  4.1%,  and  there  were

proceeds  from  this  term  loan  to  pay  off  the  remaining

no amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit.

senior  debt  and  the  senior  subordinated  notes  that  were

We  do  not  believe  that  inflation  has  had  a  significant

outstanding  as  of  December  29,  2000,  plus  accrued

effect on our operations.

interest and a call premium. At that date, there was $18.3

million  net  amount  outstanding  under  our  13%  senior

subordinated  notes,  $6.2  million  outstanding  under  our

Term A  loan  facility  and  $9.0  million  outstanding  under

our  Term  B  loan  facility.  There  were  no  amounts

outstanding  under  our  revolving  line  of  credit.  At

December 29, 2000, the weighted average interest rate for

our Term A  loans  was  10.3%  and  the  weighted  averaged

interest rate for our Term B loans was 10.5%.

Under the credit facility consummated in June 2001, both

the  term  loan  and  any  borrowings  under  the  line  of  credit

bear  interest  at  fluctuating  market  rates.  An  analysis  of

the impact on the Company’s interest rate sensitive finan-

cial instruments of a hypothetical 10% change in short-term

interest rates shows an impact on expected 2002 earnings

of  less  than  $0.3  million  of  higher  or  lower  earnings,

depending on whether short-term rates rise or fall by the

10%. The discussion and the estimated amounts referred

In  June  2001,  in  conjunction  with  the  acquisition  of

to  above  include  forward-looking  statements  of  market

Greatbatch-Sierra, we amended our credit facility with a

risk,  which  involve  certain  assumptions  as  to  market

consortium  of  banks  by  increasing  the  total  size  of  the

interest rates. Actual future market conditions may differ

facility to $100.0 million. The amended facility consisted

materially  from  such  assumptions.  Accordingly,  the

of  an  $80.0  million  term  loan  and  a  $20.0  million

forward-looking  statements  should  not  be  considered

revolving  line  of  credit.  Both  the  term  loan  and  the

projections of future events by our Company. 

revolving line of credit have a term of five years, maturing

in  July  2006.  This  credit  agreement  is  secured  by  our

accounts  receivable  and  inventories  and  requires  us  to

comply with various quarterly financial covenants related

In  July  2001,  the  Financial Accounting  Standards  Board

(FASB)  issued  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting

Standards  (SFAS)  No.  141,  "Business  Combinations,"

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

 
 
 
■
and  SFAS  No.  142,  "Goodwill  and  Other  Intangible

Assets." SFAS No. 141 addresses financial accounting and

CAUTIONARY FACTORS REGARDING
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

reporting for business combinations and supersedes APB

Some of the statements contained in this Annual Report are not statements

of  historical  or  current  fact.    As  such,  they  are  "forward-looking  state-

No. 16, "Business Combinations."  Effective July 1, 2001,

ments" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,

all  business  combinations  in  the  scope  of  this  new

as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as

amended.  You  can  identify  forward-looking  statements  by  terminology

Statement are to be accounted for using one method, the

such  as  "anticipate,"  "believe,"  "estimate,"  "expect,"  "intend,"  "may,"

purchase  method.  SFAS  No.  142  addresses  financial

"could,"  "possible,"  "potential,"  "continue,"  "plan,"  "project,"  "should,"

"will,"  "forecast"  and  similar  words  or  expressions. The  Company’s  for-

accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other

ward-looking  statements  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,  discussions

intangible assets and supersedes APB No. 17, "Intangible

Assets."  It changes the accounting for goodwill and other

intangible assets with an indefinite life from an amortiza-

tion method to an impairment-only approach. We adopted

regarding its growth plans, future financial results, product development

efforts  and  plans  and  future  uses  of  and  requirements  for  financial

resources.  You  should  carefully  consider  forward-looking  statements

and  understand  that  such  statements  involve  a  variety  of  risks  and

uncertainties,  known  and  unknown,  and  may  be  affected  by  inaccurate

assumptions.  Consequently,  no  forward-looking  statement  can  be

SFAS  No.  142  effective  December  29,  2001,  which  was

guaranteed  and  actual  results  may  vary  materially.  It  is  not  possible  to

the first day of fiscal 2002, and will cease the amortization

foresee  or  identify  all  factors  affecting  the  Company’s  forward-looking

statements  and  investors  therefore  should  not  consider  any  list  of  such

of  goodwill  and  any  other  intangible  assets  with  an

factors  to  be  an  exhaustive  statement  of  all  risks,  uncertainties  or

indefinite  life  which  were  recorded  in  past  business

combinations. Total amortization expense of all intangible

potentially inaccurate assumptions. 

Although it is not possible to create a comprehensive list of all factors that

may cause actual results to differ from the results expressed or implied by

assets  was  $7.7  million  ($0.39  before  tax,  per  diluted

the  Company’s  forward-looking  statements,  certain  of  these  factors

share)  for  the  year  ended  December  28,  2001  and  $6.5

include  those  noted  under  the  caption  "Risk  Factors"  in  the  Company’s

registration statement on Form S-1 filed June 20, 2001 (No. 333-63386)

million ($0.45 before tax, per diluted share) for the year

in connection with the Company’s public offering of common stock and in

ended December 29, 2000. Of these amounts, $3.5 million

the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December

28, 2001, as well as the following:  dependence upon a limited number of

and  $3.0  million  in  2001  and  2000,  respectively,  repre-

customers,  product  obsolescence,  inability  to  market  current  or  future

sented  amortization  of  goodwill  and  other  intangible

assets  with  indefinite  lives  that  would  not  have  been

amortized  if  SFAS  No.  142  had  been  in  effect  for  those

years.  SFAS  No.  142  also  requires  the  Company,  in  the

products,  pricing  pressures  from  customers,  reliance  on  third  parties  for

raw materials, key products and subcomponents for our products, harm to

our reputation for quality, fluctuating operating results, failure to protect

our  intellectual  property  rights,  intellectual  property  claims,  product

liability claims, inability to integrate acquisitions, unsuccessful expansion

into  new  markets,  inability  to  obtain  licenses  to  key  technology,

year  of  adoption and  for  each  year  thereafter,  to  analyze

regulatory  changes  or  consolidation  in  the  healthcare  industry,  costly

all intangible assets for possible impairment, and to write

environmental  regulations,  volatility  in  the  oil  and  gas  industry,  and

various other matters many of which are beyond our control. Given these

such  assets  down  to  fair  market  value.  The  Company

risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on our

continues to evaluate the impact of SFAS No. 142 on its

forward-looking  statements.  We  expressly  disclaim  any  obligation  or

undertaking  to  release  publicly  any  updates  or  revisions  to  any  forward-

financial position and results of operations; however, based

looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations with regard

on  the  transitional  goodwill  impairment  test,  no  impair-

ment of goodwill and other intangible assets is anticipated.

thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any

forward-looking statement is based.

23

m

a

n

a

g

e

m

e

n

t

’
s

d

i

s

c

u

s

s

i

o

n

&

a

n

a

l

y

s

i

s

 
 
 
■
24

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F O P E R A T I O N S

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Years ended December 28, 2001, December 29, 2000 and December 31, 1999
Revenues
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit

Selling, general and administrative expenses
Research, development and engineering costs, net
Intangible amortization

Interest expense, net
Other expense (income) 

Income (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary loss and 
cumulative effect of accounting change
Income tax expense (benefit)

Income (loss) before extraordinary loss and 
cumulative effect of accounting change 
Extraordinary loss on retirement of debt, net of tax
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax 

Net income (loss) 

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations
Extraordinary loss on retirement of debt
Cumulative effect of accounting change

Net earnings (loss)  

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations
Extraordinary loss on retirement of debt
Cumulative effect of accounting change

Net earnings (loss)  

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

Basic
Diluted

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2001
$135,575    

74,716        
60,859         

18,174        
12,575          
7,726           
22,384  

3,588         

266

18,530          
6,939           

11,591          
(2,994)       

-            

$

8,597  

$    0.59  

(0.15)         
-           

$

0.44  

$    0.58    

(0.15)         
-           

$      0.43  

19,563         
19,945         

C O N S O L I D A T E D B A L A N C E S H E E T S

2000
$  97,790  
55,446 
42,344  

11,473  
9,941  
6,530  
14,400  

12,958  

(189)                 

1,631
611

1,020
(1,568)       

-      

1999
$  79,235  
41,057  
38,178  

9,880  
9,339  
6,510  
12,449  

13,420  
1,343  

(2,314)

(605)  

(1,709)  

-       
(563)          

$   

(548)                                 $   (2,272)

$      0.07   
(0.11)  

-       

$ 

(0.04)                                 $ 

$     (0.14)  
-  

(0.04)                   
(0.18)  

$

$    (0.14)  
0.07
(0.11)                                             -   

-       

$  

(0.04)                                 $ 

(0.04)                   
(0.18)  

14,167  
14,434  

12,491  
12,491  

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets
Current Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for 
doubtful accounts of $447 and $319, respectively
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Deferred tax asset

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment, net
Intangible assets, net
Deferred tax asset
Other assets
Total Assets

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Current maturities of long-term obligations

Total current liabilities

Long-term obligations
Total liabilities

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholders' Equity:

Common stock
Capital in excess of par value
Retained deficit
Subtotal

Less treasury stock, at cost

Total stockholders’ equity

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

December 28,
2001

$   43,272

17,373 
29,026
2,316 
2,888 
94,875
44,149
137,135
5,417
1,944
$ 283,520

$    6,553
13,721
13,005  
33,279
61,397
94,676 

21
200,880

(8,935) 

191,966
(3,122)
188,844 
$ 283,520 

December 29,
2000

$         16  

12,977  
13,643  
1,442    
1,863  
29,941  
36,625  
104,395  
8,800  
1,886  
$ 181,647  

$ 

2,365  
9,480  
3,017  
14,862  
30,951  
45,813  

19  
157,526  
(17,532) 
140,013  

(4,179)                   

135,834  
$ 181,647  

 
 
■
C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F C A S H F L O W S

(Dollars in thousands)

Years ended December 28, 2001, December 29, 2000 and December 31, 1999
Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities, net of acquisitions:

Depreciation and amortization
Extraordinary loss on retirement of debt
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Deferred income taxes
Loss on disposal of assets
Valuation loss on investment held at cost
Cumulative effect of accounting change
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Income taxes

2001

$ 8,597  

13,929         
3,019        
312        

2,358

132         

-           
-            

2000

1999

$     (548)           

$    (2,272)  

12,102  
2,407  
907  
(369)                   

68   

-       
-       

11,363  

-       

972  

1,309

146  
859       
939       

947 
(292) 
(663) 
251 
(2,741)  
(1,826) 
8,992  

(4,396)                                            (1,018)               
914                
(10,030)             
2,144                   
(128)
1,536                
145                

(928)  
3,025
4,760           

677              

Net cash provided by operating activities

21,455         

18,160  

Investing Activities:
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Increase in intangible assets
Decrease in other long term assets
Net cash effect of acquisitions
Net cash used in investing activities

Financing Activities:
Borrowings (repayments) under line of credit, net
Proceeds from long-term debt
Scheduled payments of long-term debt
Prepayments of long-term debt
Acquisition earnout payment
Purchase of treasury stock
Expenses related to public offering of stock
Issuance of common stock
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

(9,715)

5       

(2,809)
-
(46,913)         
(59,432)

4  

(4,528)                                     (8,452) 
5 
(417)                                        (570) 
170 

-       
1,583       
(3,358)                                      (8,847) 

-       

-
87,000          
(6,013)       
(42,265)                                          (93,735)               

(4,300)               
-       

-      

(4,456)                      

4,300 
-  
- 
(2,950) 
(2,764)       
(2,565)                                        (109)       
(2,153)                       
-       
88,560  
1,101  
(18,649)                                        (422)  
(3,847)                                        (277)  
4,140  
3,863  
3,863

$  

$        16

-          
-       
(1,156)       
43,667       
81,233     
43,256       
16        

$ 43,272

C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F S T O C K H O L D E R S’   E Q U I T Y

(Dollars in thousands)

Balance, January 2, 1999
Common stock issued
Common stock acquired for treasury
Shares contributed to Employee
Stock ownership Plan
Exercise of stock options
Net loss

Balance, December 31, 1999 
Common stock issued
Common stock acquired for treasury
Shares contributed to Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
Shares issued to acquire
Battery Engineering, Inc.
Purchase and cancel fractional shares
Settlement of common stock subscriptions
Exercise of stock options
Net loss

Balance, December 29, 2000
Common stock issued
Shares contributed to Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
Purchase and cancel fractional shares
Exercise of stock options
Net income

66,537  
-  

139,470
20,668  

-       

12,288,128  
5,950,000  

-

57,038  

339,856
(70)
336,800

47  

-       

-  
-       

-
-       
-       

12 
6       
-

-       

1
-
-
-       
-       

18,971,799  
2,000,000  

19  
2  

-  

-       
(84)               -       
-       
-       

-       

11,340  

Balance, December 28, 2001

20,983,055           $ 21

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

-       
-       

-
-       
-       

-       
-

-       

-       
-       

-  
-       

-       
-       
-       
-       

-

Common Stock
Shares                  Amount

Subscribed
Common Stock
Shares                    Amount

Capital
In Excess
of Par
Value

Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)

Treasury
Stock
Shares                 Amount

12,061,453

$ 12

336,800

$1,684
-
-       

-
-       
-       

$ 60,295

$(14,712)

998  
-  

2,092

103  

-       
-       

-
-       

-          (2,272)  

Subscribed
Common
Stock
Receivable

$1,684

-      
-      

-
-       
7,285       

$       -
-
109       

-
-       
-       

-

-
-                -       
-       
-       

336,800  

1,684  

63,488  
86,401  

-

(16,984) 

-       
-

7,285       
-       

265,746

109         1,684
-
-

-       

4,250

-       
-

-       

856  

-        (11,970)             (180)       

-       

-
-
(336,800)

-
-
(1,684)

5,097
(1)
1,684

-       
-       

1  
-       

-
-
-
-       

(548) 

-
-
-
-       
-       

-
-
-
-       
-       

-  
-  

157,526  
42,427  

(17,532) 

261,061  

4,179  

-       

-       

-       

- 

845  

-       
-                 (2)                -       
-       
-       
8,597              
-       

-       

84  

(66,059) 

-       
-       
-       

(1,057) 

-       
-       
-       

-

$200,880

$  (8,935)

195,002

$ 3,122

-

-
-
(1,684)

-       
-       

-  
-       

-            
-       
-       
-       

25

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
■
26

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc.

Clarence, New York

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance

sheets  of  Wilson  Greatbatch  Technologies,  Inc.  and

subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 28, 2001 and

December  29,  2000,  and  the  related  consolidated

statements  of  operations,  stockholders’ equity,  and  cash

flows  for  each  of  the  three  years  in  the  period  ended

December  28,  2001.  These  financial  statements  are  the

responsibility  of  the  Company’s  management.  Our

responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial

statements based on our audits.

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Entity - The consolidated financial statements include

the  accounts  of Wilson  Greatbatch Technologies,  Inc.,  a

holding  company,  and  its  wholly-owned  subsidiary

Wilson  Greatbatch  Ltd.  (collectively,  the  "Company").

The  Company  is  comprised  of  its  operating  companies,

Wilson  Greatbatch  Ltd.  and 

its  wholly-owned

subsidiaries,  Greatbatch-Hittman,  Inc.  ("Hittman"),

Greatbatch-Sierra, Inc. ("Sierra") and Battery Engineering,

Inc.  ("BEI"). All  significant  intercompany  balances  and

transactions have been eliminated.

Nature  of  Operations –  The  Company  operates  in  two

reportable  segments–medical  and  commercial  power

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing

sources. The medical segment designs and manufactures

standards  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of

power  sources,  capacitors  and  components  used  in

America. Those standards require that we plan and perform

the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether

the financial statements are free of material misstatement.

An  audit  includes  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence

supporting  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial

statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting

principles  used  and  signif icant  estimates  made  by

management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  financial

statement  presentation.    We  believe  that  our  audits

provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  such  consolidated  financial  statements

present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position

of Wilson  Greatbatch Technologies,  Inc.  and    subsidiary

as of December 28, 2001 and December 29, 2000, and the

results of their operations and their cash flows for each of

the three years in the period ended December 28, 2001 in

implantable  medical  devices.  The  commercial  power

sources  segment  designs  and  manufactures  non-medical

power  sources  for  use  in  aerospace,  oil  and  gas

exploration and oceanographic equipment.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents

consist of cash and highly liquid, short-term investments

with maturities at the time of purchase of three months or

less.  The  cash  balance  at  December  28,  2001  primarily

reflects  the  proceeds  from  the  Company’s  secondary

public offering (see Note 12).

Inventories - Inventories include raw materials, work-in-

process  and  finished  goods  and  are  stated  at  the  lower

of  cost  (as  determined  by  the  first-in,  first-out  method)

conformity with accounting principles generally accepted

or market.

in the United States of America.

Property, Plant  and  Equipment -  Property,  plant  and

As  discussed  in  Note  2  to  the  consolidated  financial

equipment  is  carried  at  cost.  Depreciation  is  computed

statements, in 1999, the Company changed its method of

primarily  by  the  straight-line  method  over  the  estimated

accounting for costs of start-up activities.

Buffalo, New York

January 25, 2002

useful lives of the assets, which are as follows:  buildings

and  building  improvements  7-40  years;  machinery  and

equipment 3-10 years; office equipment 3-10 years; and

leasehold  improvements  over  the  remaining  lives  of  the

improvements or the lease term, if less.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   p r o v i d e   a   b e t t e r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e

 
 
 
 
■
The  cost  of  repairs  and  maintenance  is  charged  to

Concentration  of  Credit  Risk -  Financial  instruments

expense  as  incurred.  Renewals  and  betterments  are

which  potentially  subject  the  Company  to  concentration

capitalized.  Upon  retirement  or  sale  of  an  asset,  its  cost

of  credit  risk  consist  principally  of  trade  receivables.

and  related  accumulated  depreciation  or  amortization

A  significant  portion  of  the  Company’s  sales  are  to

are  removed  from  the  accounts  and  any  gain  or  loss  is

customers  in  the  medical  industry,  and,  as  such,  the

recorded in income or expense. The Company continually

Company  is  directly  affected  by  the  condition  of  that

reviews plant and equipment to determine that the carrying

industry.  However,  the  credit  risk  associated  with  trade

values have not been impaired.

receivables  is  minimal  due  to  the  Company’s  stable

Intangible  Assets -  Intangible  assets  include  goodwill

and  other  identifiable  intangible  assets,  which  were

derived  in  connection  with  the  Company’s  acquisitions.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over

the  fair  value  of  the  net  assets  acquired.  Goodwill  has

been  amortized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  20  to  40

customer  base  and  ongoing  control  procedures,  which

monitor the creditworthiness of customers. The Company

maintains  cash  deposits  with  major  banks,  which  from

time  to  time  may  exceed  federally  insured  limits.  The

Company periodically assesses the financial condition of

the  institutions  and  believes  that  the  risk  of  any  loss  is

years.  Other  identifiable  intangible  assets  are  being

minimal.

amortized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  their  estimated

Derivative  Financial  Instruments -  The  Company  has

useful  lives  as  follows:  trademark  and  names,  40  years;

only  limited  involvement  with  derivative  f inancial

patented technology, 12 years; assembled workforce, 10-

instruments and does not enter into financial instruments

12  years;  and  other  intangibles,  3-10  years.  Deferred

for  trading  purposes.  Interest  rate  cap  agreements  have

financing  costs  are  amortized  using  the  effective  yield

been  used  to  reduce  the  potential  impact  of  increases  in

method  over  the  life  of  the  underlying  debt.  The

interest  rates  on  floating-rate  long-term  debt.  Premiums

Company continually reviews these intangible assets for

paid  for  purchased  interest  rate  cap  agreements  are

potential  impairment  by  assessing  significant  decreases

amortized  over  the  terms  of  the  caps  and  recognized  as

in the market value, a significant change in the extent or

interest expense. Unamortized premiums are included in

manner in which an asset is used or a significant adverse

other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Amounts

change  in  the  business  climate. The  Company  measures

receivable under interest rate cap agreements are accrued

expected  future  cash  flows  and  compares  them  to  the

as a reduction of interest expense. At December 28, 2001,

carrying  amount  of  the  asset  to  determine  whether  any

and  December  29,  2000,  the  Company  was  not  party  to

impairment loss is to be recognized.

any interest rate cap agreements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The fair value of

Stock  Option  Plan -  The  Company  accounts  for  stock-

financial  instruments  is  determined  by  reference  to

based  compensation  in  accordance  with  Statement  of

various  market  data  and  other  valuation  techniques,  as

Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for

appropriate. Unless otherwise disclosed, the fair value of

Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). As permitted

cash  and  cash  equivalents  approximates  their  recorded

in that Standard, the Company has chosen to account for

values due to the nature of the instruments. The floating

stock-based  compensation  using  the  intrinsic  value

rate  debt  carrying  value  approximates  the  fair  value

method  prescribed  in  Accounting  Principles  Board

based  on  the  floating  interest  rate  resetting  on  a  regular

No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and

basis.  The  fixed  rate  long-term  debt  carrying  value

related interpretations. Prior to its Initial Public Offering

approximates fair value.

27

n

o

t

e

s

t

o

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
 
 
■
28

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

in September 2000, there was no readily available market

Earnings (Loss) Per Share – Basic earnings per share is

for  the  Company’s  stock.  In  the  absence  of  a  "regular,

calculated  by  dividing  net  income  (loss)  by  the  average

active  public  market,"  the  Board  of  Directors  had

number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted

determined the fair market value of the common stock via

earnings per share is calculated by adjusting for common

independent valuations.

stock  equivalents,  which  consist  of  stock  options. There

Income Taxes – The Company provides for income taxes

using the liability method whereby deferred tax liabilities

and assets are recognized based on temporary differences

between  the  financial  reporting  and  tax  basis  of  assets

and  liabilities  using  the  anticipated  tax  rate  when  taxes

are expected to be paid or reversed.

Financial Statement Year End – The Company’s year end

is  the  closest  Friday  to  December  31.  Fiscal  2001,  2000

and 1999 included 52 weeks.

Revenue  Recognition -  Revenues  are  recognized  when

the products are shipped and title passes to customers.

Research, Development  and  Engineering  Costs –

Research,  development  and  engineering  costs  are

expensed  as  incurred.  The  Company  recognizes  cost

reimbursements  from  customers  for  whom  the  Company

designs  products  upon  achieving  milestones  related  to

designing batteries and capacitors for their products. The

cost  reimbursements  charged  to  customers  represent

actual  costs  incurred  by  the  Company  in  the  design  and

testing  of  prototypes  built  to  customer  specifications.

This  cost  reimbursement  includes  no  mark-up  and  is

recorded  as  an  offset  to  research,  development  and

engineering costs.

Net research, development and engineering costs for 2001,

2000 and 1999 are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)

2001

2000

1999

Research, development and engineering costs 

$15,051  

$13,101   $11,885  

Less cost reimbursements

 (2,476)

(3,160)

(2,546)

Research, development and engineering costs, net

$12,575  

$  9,941   $  9,339

Interest Expense, Net – Interest expense includes interest

income  of  $423,000,  $254,000  and  $242,000  for  2001,

2000 and 1999, respectively.

were  approximately  0.2  million  stock  options  that  were

not  included  in  the  computation  of  diluted  earnings  per

share for 1999 because to do so would have been antidi-

lutive. Diluted  earnings  per  share  for  2001  and  2000

include  the  potentially  dilutive  effect  of  stock  options.

All  shares  held  in  the  Employee  Stock  Ownership  Plan

("ESOP")  are  considered  outstanding  for  both  basic  and

diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations. 

Comprehensive  Income –  Comprehensive 

income

includes all changes in stockholders’ equity during a peri-

od except those resulting from investments by owners and

distribution  to  owners.  For  all  periods  presented,  the

Company’s only component of comprehensive income is

its net income (loss) for those periods.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements

in  conformity  with  accounting  principles  generally

accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America  requires

management  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that

affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and

disclosure of contingent assets and  liabilities at the date

of  the  financial  statements  and  reported  amounts  of

revenues  and  expenses  during  the  reporting  period.

Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Accounting  Change -  In  1999,  the  Company  adopted

Statement  of  Position  98-5,  “Reporting  the  Costs  of

Start-Up Activities.” This statement required that start-up

costs,  including  organization  costs,  capitalized  by  the

Company prior to January 2, 1999, be written off and any

future  start-up  costs  be  expensed  as  incurred.  The  total

amount  of  deferred  start-up  costs  reported  as  a

cumulative  effect  of  change  in  accounting  principle  was

$939,000, net of tax benefits of $376,000.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   a p p l y   t e c h n o l o g y   t o   g r e a t e r   c h a l l e n g e s

 
 
 
 
■
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

trademark  and  names  was  approximately  $2.1  million,

(dollars in thousands)

2001

2000

1999

Cash paid during the year for:

Interest

Income taxes

Noncash investing and financing activities:

$ 3,717  

$12,833   $13,790  

2,214  

122  

186  

Common stock issued for acquisition

$        -      $  5,098   $  

-    

Common stock contributed to ESOP

1,902  

1,036  

2,092  

Settlement of subscribed common stock receivable

-        1,684  

-    

$0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.  At December

28, 2001, goodwill, assembled workforce and trademark

and names approximated $76.9 million, $4.6 million and

$28.9 million, respectively. On an annual basis, and when

there  is  reason  to  suspect  that  their  values  have  been

diminished  or  impaired,  these  assets  must  be  tested  for

impairment,  and  write-downs  to  be  included  in  results

from  operations  may  be  necessary.  SFAS  No.  142  also

requires the Company to complete a transitional goodwill

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In July 2001, the

impairment test six months from the date of adoption and

Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (FASB)  issued

any  goodwill  impairment  loss  will  be  recognized  as  a

Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  141,

cumulative  effect  of  a  change  in  accounting  principle.

“Business Combinations” (SFAS No. 141), and Statement

The  Company  continues  to  evaluate  the  impact  of

of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  142,  “Goodwill

SFAS  No.  142  on  its  consolidated  financial  statements;

and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142).  The FASB

however,  based  on  the  transitional  goodwill  impairment

also issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards

test,  no  impairment  of  goodwill  and  other  intangible

No.  143,  “Accounting  for  Obligations  Associated  with

assets is anticipated.

the  Retirement  of  Long-Lived Assets”  (SFAS  No.  143),

and  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.

144,  “Accounting  for  the  Impairment  or  Disposal  of

Long-Lived  Assets”  (SFAS  No.  144),  in  August  and

October 2001, respectively. 

SFAS  No.  143  establishes  accounting  standards  for  the

recognition  and  measurement  of  an  asset  retirement

obligation and its associated asset retirement cost. It also

provides  accounting  guidance  for  legal  obligations

associated  with  the  retirement  of  tangible  long-lived

SFAS  No.  141  requires  the  purchase  method  of

assets. SFAS No. 143 is effective in fiscal years beginning

accounting  for  business  combination  initiated  after  June

after  June  15,  2002,  with  early  adoption  permitted. The

30,  2001  and  eliminates  the  pooling-of-interest  method.

Company  expects  that  the  provisions  of  SFAS  No.  143

The  Company  adopted  SFAS  No.  141  on  July  1,  2001.

will  not  have  a  material  impact  on  its  consolidated

Under provisions of SFAS No. 141, the Company will be

financial statements upon adoption. The Company plans

required  to  reclassify  its  assembled  workforce  and

to adopt SFAS No. 143 effective December 30, 2002, the

trademark and names to goodwill effective December 29,

beginning of fiscal year 2003.

2001, the beginning of fiscal year 2002.

SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting model for

Effective  December  29,  2001,  the  beginning  of  fiscal

the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, including

year  2002,  the  Company  adopted  SFAS  No.  142.  Under

discontinued  operations.  SFAS  No.  144  superseded

the  new  rules,  the  Company  is  no  longer  required  to

Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  121,

amortize  goodwill  and  other  intangible  assets  with

“Accounting  for  the  Impairment  of  Long-Lived  Assets

indefinite lives, but will be subject to periodic testing for

and  for  Long-Lived  Assets  to  Be  Disposed  Of ”  (SFAS

impairment. As a result, amortization related to goodwill,

No.  121),  and  APB  Opinion  No.  30,  “Reporting  the

assembled workforce and trademark and names ceases as

Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal

of  December  28,  2001.  Amortization  expense  in  2001

of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual

attributable  to  goodwill,  assembled  workforce  and

and  Infrequently  Occurring  Events  and  Transactions.”

29

n

o

t

e

s

t

o

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
 
 
■
30

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

The  provisions  of  SFAS  No.  144  are  effective  in  fiscal

Sierra  had  taken  place  at  the  beginning  of  fiscal  year

years  beginning  after  December  15,  2001,  with  early

2000 were $142.3 million, $11.1 million, $8.1 million and

adoption  permitted,  and  in  general  are  to  be  applied

$0.41  per  share  for  fiscal  year  2001,  and  $108.4  million,

prospectively.    Effective  December  29,  2001,  the  begin-

($3.0)  million,  ($4.5)  million,  and  ($0.31)  per  share  for

ning of fiscal year 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No.

fiscal 2000, respectively.  Such pro forma results are not

144  and  does  not  expect  that  the  adoption  will  have  a

necessarily  indicative  of  what  the  actual  consolidated

material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

results  of  operations  might  have  been  if  the  acquisition

3. ACQUISITIONS

On June 18, 2001, the Company completed the acquisition

of  substantially  all  of  the  assets  of  the  Sierra-KD

Components  division  of  Maxwell  Technologies,  Inc.

("Sierra"),  a  developer  and  manufacturer  of  electromag-

netic  interference  filters  and  capacitors  for  implantable

had been effective at the beginning of fiscal year 2000.

On August 4, 2000, the Company acquired all of the capi-

tal stock of BEI, a small specialty battery manufacturer,

in exchange for 339,856 shares ($5,098,000) of Company

common stock and the assumption of approximately $2.7

million of indebtedness.

medical  devices  for  $49.0  million  in  cash  and  certain

The acquisition was recorded under the purchase method

assumed liabilities.

The acquisition was recorded under the purchase method

of accounting and accordingly, the results of the operations

of Sierra have been included in the consolidated financial

statements  from  the  date  of  acquisition.  The  assets

acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair val-

ues. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value

of  net  assets  acquired  was  recorded  as  goodwill.

Liabilities assumed in this acquisition were $2.1 million.

of accounting and accordingly, the results of the operations

of  BEI  have  been  included  in  the  consolidated  financial

statements  from  the  date  of  acquisition.  The  purchase

price has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities

assumed based on the fair value at the date of acquisition.

Liabilities assumed in this acquisition were $3.9 million.

The  excess  of  the  acquisition  cost  over  fair  value  of  the

net  assets  acquired  was  approximately  $0.8  million,

which was allocated to goodwill.

The excess of the purchase price over fair value of the net

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

assets  acquired  was  approximately  $39.5  million,  of

which $15.7 million was allocated to identifiable intangi-

ble  assets  and  $23.8  million  was  allocated  to  goodwill.

Direct  costs  of  $0.3  million  related  to  the  acquisition

were also allocated to goodwill.

(dollars in thousands)

Raw material

Work-in-process

Unaudited,  pro  forma  consolidated  revenues,  income

Finished goods

(loss)  before  extraordinary  loss,  net  income,  and  diluted

Total

earnings  (loss)  per  share,  assuming  the  acquisition  of

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

$13,894  

$  7,302  

9,955  

4,941  

  5,177

  1,400

$29,026  

$13,643

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

 
 
 
 
■
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

(dollars in thousands)

December 28,

December 29,

(dollars in thousands)

2001

2000

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

Land and land improvements

$    3,749  

$    3,316  

Salaries and benefits

$  5,165  

$ 4,901  

Buildings and building improvements

Leasehold improvements

8,632  

3,742  

6,799  

2,837  

Machinery and equipment

37,000  

32,610  

Furniture and fixtures

Computers and information technology

1,991  

4,630  

1,742  

2,569  

Other

    4,041

     678

63,785  

50,551  

Less accumulated depreciation

(19,636)

(13,926)

Total

$  44,149  

$  36,625  

Depreciation expense for 2001, 2000 and 1999 was

approximately $5,917,000, $4,943,000, and $4,240,000,

respectively.

6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

Profit sharing

4,010  

2,456  

Other

Total

  4,546

  2,123

$13,721  

$ 9,480  

8. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS

Long-term obligations consisted of the following:

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

(dollars in thousands)

Long-term Debt:

Term Loan, $80.0 million, due July 2006.  

Quarterly principal installments due of 

$3.0 million from January 2002 through 

July 2002, $3.5 million from October 2002 

through July 2003, $4.0 million from 

October 2003 through July 2004, $4.5 million

from October 2004 through July 2005, and 

$5.0 million from October 2005 through 

July 2006.  Interest payments are 

due monthly.

$   74,000  

$         -     

(dollars in thousands)

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

Term A Facility, $50.0 million.  This 

credit facility was refinanced in its 

Goodwill, net of accumulated 

amortization of $5,942 and $3,803

$  76,883  

$ 54,948  

Trademark and names, net of accumulated 

entirety on January 12, 2001.  See below. 

-       

6,247  

Term B Facility, $60.0 million.  This 

credit facility was refinanced in its entirety

amortization of $3,235 and $2,426

28,923  

27,234  

on January 12, 2001.  See below. 

-       

9,018  

Patented technology, net of accumulated 

amortization of $5,363 and $3,952

16,512  

9,478  

License agreement, net of accumulated 

amortization of $4,447 and $3,459

-  

988  

Assembled workforce, net of accumulated 

amortization of $2,737 and $2,103

4,643  

5,277  

Senior Subordinated Notes, $25.0 million.  

These notes were refinanced in their entirety 

on January 12, 2001. See below.                                   -

Total long-term debt

74,000  

18,337

33,602  

Other long-term obligations

    402

    366

Total long-term obligations

74,402  

33,968  

Noncompete/employment agreement, net of 

accumulated amortization of $3,267 and $2,333

2,333  

3,267  

Less current maturities of long-term obligations

(13,005)

(3,017)

Long-term obligations

$   61,397  

$  30,951  

Unpatented proprietary technology, net of 

accumulated amortization of $2,417 and $1,611

5,526  

1,589  

Patent licenses, net of accumulated 

amortization of $572 and $313

391  

367  

Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated 

amortization of $312 and $4,405

   1,924

   1,247

Total

$137,135  

$104,395  

31

n

o

t

e

s

t

o

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
 
 
■
32

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

On January 12, 2001, the Company consummated a new,

outstanding under the Company’s 13% senior subordinated

$60.0  million  credit  facility,  which  consisted  of  a  $40.0

notes,  $6.2  million  outstanding  under  the  Term  A  loan

million  term  loan  and  a  $20.0  million  revolving  line  of

facility  and  $9.0  million  outstanding  under  the  Term  B

credit.  In June 2001, in conjunction with the acquisition

loan facility.

of Sierra, the Company amended this $60.0 million credit

facility with a consortium of banks by increasing the total

size  of  the  facility  to  $100.0  million.  The  amended

facility consists of an $80.0 million term loan and a $20.0

million  revolving  line  of  credit.  Both  the  term  loan  and

the  revolving  line  of  credit  have  a  term  of  five  years,

maturing  in  July  2006.  The  new  credit  agreement  is

secured by the Company’s accounts receivable and inven-

tories and requires the Company to comply with various

quarterly  financial  covenants  related  to  net  earnings  or

loss  before  interest  expense,  income  taxes,  depreciation

and  amortization  ("EBITDA"),  as  it  is  defined  in  the

credit  agreement,  and  ratios  of  leverage,  interest  and

In  October  2000,  using  the  net  proceeds  from  its  Initial

Public  Offering,  the  Company  prepaid  $34.4  million  of

its  Term  A  Facility  and  $49.6  million  of  its  Term  B

Facility. Also in October 2000, the Company repurchased

$5.0  million  of  its  Senior  Subordinated  Notes  and

purchased  for  its  Treasury  127,532  shares  of  common

stock from the noteholder. As a result of the prepayment

and repurchase transactions, an extraordinary loss for the

extinguishment  of  debt  was  recorded  in  the  fourth

quarter of 2000 in the amount of $1.6 million, net of tax.

Maturities  of  long-term  obligations  subsequent  to

December 28, 2001:

fixed  charges  as  they  relate  to  EBITDA.  Both  the  term

(dollars in thousands)

loan and the revolving line of credit bear interest at a rate

that  varies  with  the  Company’s  degree  of  leverage.  At

December 28, 2001 leverage levels, the applicable inter-

est rates for both the term loan and revolving line of cred-

it are prime less 0.75% or the London Interbank Offered

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Rate, or LIBOR, plus 1.25%, at the Company’s option. At

Thereafter

$  13,005  

15,000  

17,000  

19,000  

10,000  

     397

December  28,  2001  there  was  no  amount  outstanding

Total of long-term maturities

$  74,402 

under the revolving line of credit.

9. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE

The proceeds from the January 2001 term loan were used

BENEFIT PLANS

to pay off the remaining senior debt (Term A and Term B)

Incentive Compensation Plans - The Company sponsors

and  the  senior  subordinated  notes  that  were  outstanding

various incentive compensation programs, which provide

as  of  December  29,  2000.  As  a  result  of  this  debt

for the payment of cash or stock options to key employees

restructuring,  there  was  an  extraordinary  loss  of  $3.0

based  upon  achievement  of  specific  earnings  goals

million,  net  of  taxes.  The  loss  was  associated  with  the

before incentive compensation expense.

restructuring of our long-term debt and the related write-

off of deferred financing fees and loan discounts associated

with  the  previous  long-term  debt.  Also  included  in  the

loss  was  the  payment  of  $1.7  million,  before  taxes,  as  a

call  premium  to  the  holders  of  our  senior  subordinated

notes. At  that  date,  there  was  $18.3  million  net  amount

Employee Stock Ownership Plan - The Company sponsors

a  non-leveraged  Employee  Stock  Ownership  Plan

(‘‘ESOP’’)  and  related  trust  as  a  long-term  benefit  for

substantially  all  of  its  employees  as  defined  in  the  plan

documents. Under the terms of the ESOP plan documents,

there  are  two  components  to  ESOP  contributions.  The

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   p r o v i d e   a   b e t t e r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e

 
 
 
 
■
first  component  is  a  defined  contribution  pension  plan

granted  at  exercise  prices  equal  to  the  fair  market  value

whose  annual  contribution  equals  five  percent  of  each

of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant.

employee’s compensation. Contributions to the ESOP are

in the form of Company stock. The second component is

a discretionary profit sharing contribution as determined

by the Board of Directors. This profit sharing contribution

is to be contributed to the ESOP in the form of Company

stock.  The  ESOP  is  subject  to  contribution  limitations

and vesting requirements as defined in the plan.

The  Company’s  1998  Stock  Option  Plan  (‘‘1998  Plan’’)

authorizes  the  issuance  of  nonqualified  and  incentive

stock  options  to  purchase  up  to  1,220,000  shares  of

common  stock  of  the  Company,  subject  to  the  terms  of

the plan. The stock options vest over a three to five year

period and may vary depending upon the achievement of

earnings targets. The stock options expire 10 years from

Compensation  cost  under  the  two  components  of  the

the  date  of  the  grant.  Stock  options  are  granted  at

ESOP  recognized  by  the  Company  was  approximately

exercise  prices  equal  to  the  fair  value  of  the  Company’s

$3.0 million in 2001, $1.9 million in 2000 and $1.1 million

common stock at the date of the grant.

in  1999.  As  of  December  28,  2001,  the  Company  had

contributed  304,547  shares  under  the  ESOP  and

approximately  83,000  committed-to-be  released  shares

under  the  ESOP,  which  equals  the  number  of  shares  to

settle  the  liability  based  on  the  closing  market  price  of

the shares at December 31, 2001.

On  November  16,  2001,  the  Company  adopted  and

approved the Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan

(the  “Director  Plan”).  The  Director  Plan  authorizes  the

issuance  of  nonqualified  stock  options  to  purchase  up  to

100,000 shares of common stock of the Company from its

treasury, subject to the terms of the plan. The stock options

Savings Plan - The Company sponsors a defined contri-

vest over a three-year period. The stock options expire 10

bution  401(k)  plan,  which  covers  substantially  all  of  its

years from the date of grant. Stock options are granted at

employees. The plan provides for the deferral of employee

exercise  prices  equal  to  the  fair  value  of  the  Company’s

compensation under Section 401(k) and a Company match.

common stock at the date of the grant.

Net  pension  costs  related  to  this  defined  contribution

pension  plan  were  approximately  $622,000,  $468,000

and $429,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

As  of  December  28,  2001,  options  for  1,093,668

shares  were  available  for  future  grants  under  the  plans.

The  weighted  average  remaining  contractual  life  is

Total  costs  to  the  Company  for  all  of  the  above  plans

seven years.

were  approximately  $5,470,000,  $3,367,000  and

$1,946,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

The fair value of stock options granted subsequent to the

Company’s Initial Public Offering on September 29, 2000

10. STOCK OPTION PLANS

was  the  closing  stock  price  on  the  date  of  grant.  The

The Company has stock option plans that provide for the

issuance  of  nonqualified  and  incentive  stock  options  to

employees  of  the  Company. The  Company’s  1997  Stock

Option  Plan  (‘‘1997  Plan’’)  authorizes  the  issuance  of

options  to  purchase  up  to  480,000  shares  of  common

stock  of  the  Company. The  stock  options  generally  vest

over a five year period and may vary depending upon the

achievement of earnings targets. The stock options expire

10  years  from  the  date  of  the  grant.  Stock  options  are

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors had

determined  the  fair  value  of  the  stock  options  granted

prior  to  September  29,  2000.  In  the  absence  of  a

‘‘regular,  active  public  market,”  and  based  in  part  on

independent  valuations  of  the  Company’s  stock  as  of

December  31,  1999  and  1998  and  consideration  of

comparable  companies,  the  fair  value  of  the  common

stock  underlying  stock  options  granted  in  1999  was

estimated to be $15.00 per share. 

33

n

o

t

e

s

t

o

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
 
 
■
34

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

A summary of the transactions under the 1997 Plan and

The Company has determined the pro forma information

1998 Plan for 1999, 2000 and 2001 follows:

as if the Company had accounted for stock options grant-

Option

Activity

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

Balance at January 2, 1999

455,907  

$  5.00  

Options granted

Options exercised

Options forfeited

Balance at December 31, 1999

Options granted

Options exercised

Options forfeited

Balance at December 29, 2000

Options granted

Options exercised

Options forfeited

138,457  

(20,668) 

(63,439)

510,257  

83,472  

(47) 

(2,997)

590,685  

101,934  

(11,340) 

 (14,960)

Balance at December 28, 2001

 666,319

Options exercisable at:

December 31, 1999

December 29, 2000

December 28, 2001

133,325  

245,759  

442,526 

15.00  

5.00  

5.75  

7.60  

15.49  

15.00  

15.00  

8.70  

26.06  

6.06  

9.58  

11.38  

$7.05 

$7.66 

$8.38

ed under  the  fair  value  method  of  SFAS  No.  123.  The

binomial option pricing model was used with the following

weighted  average  assumptions:  risk  free  interest  rates

of  5.00%,  6.37%  and  6.55%  in  2001,  2000  and  1999,

respectively; no dividend yield; expected common stock

market  price  volatility  factor  of  55%  in  2001,  48%  in

2000, and effectively zero in 1999; and a weighted average

expected life of the options of 7 years. As prescribed by

SFAS  No.  123,  pro  forma  net  income  (loss),  basic  and

diluted  earnings  (loss)  per  share  would  have  been

$7,880,000, $0.40, $0.40; $(1,365,000), $(0.10), $(0.10);

and  $(2,975,000),  $(0.24),  $(0.24)  for  2001,  2000  and

1999, respectively. These pro forma calculations assume

the common stock is freely tradable for all years presented

and,  as  such,  the  impact  is  not  necessarily  indicative  of

the effects on reported net income of future years.

11. INCOME TAXES

The  components  of  income  tax  expense  (benefit)  attrib-

utable to continuing operations for 2001, 2000 and 1999,

consisted of the following:

Of  the  options  outstanding  as  of  December  28,  2001,

(dollars in thousands)

2001

2000

1999

358,218  options  were  at  an  exercise  price  of  $5.00,

Federal:

202,996 options were at a range of exercise prices of $15.00

to  $16.00,  39,659  options  were  at  a  range  of  exercise

prices  of  $20.00  to  $26.00  and  65,446  options  were  at  a

Current

Deferred

range of exercise prices of $27.50 to $32.48. The exercise

State:

prices  of  outstanding  options  approximated 

their

weighted average exercise prices.

Current

Deferred

No  compensation  cost  has  been  recognized  in  the

$ 3,839 

$     - 

$ (702) 

2,365

  411

 685

6,204

  411

  (17)

742

41

(1,588) 

    (7)

  159

1,000

  735

  200

 (588)

consolidated  financial statements  because  the  option

Income tax expense (benefit)

$ 6,939

$ 611

$(605) 

exercise  price  was  equal  to  the  estimated  fair  market

value  of  the  underlying  stock  on  the  date  of  grant.  The

weighted average grant date fair value of options granted

was $16.02 in 2001, $9.06 for 2000 and $5.45 for 1999.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   a p p l y   t e c h n o l o g y   t o   g r e a t e r   c h a l l e n g e s

 
 
 
 
■
The net deferred tax asset includes the following:

in-process research, development and engineering costs.

(dollars in thousands)

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

Deferred tax asset - current

$ 2,888  

$  1,863  

Deferred tax asset - non current

  5,417

8,800

The  provision  for  income  taxes  differs  in  each  of  the

years from the federal statutory rate due to the following:

2001           2000         1999

Net deferred tax asset

$ 8,305  

$10,663  

Statutory rate

35.0 %

35.0 %

35.0 %

The tax effect of major temporary differences that give rise

to the Company’s net deferred tax asset are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

State taxes                                                              2.9  

(1.7) 

(30.2) 

Federal and state tax credits                                         -                -          20.4  

Other                                                                    (0.5)

  4.2

0.9

Effective tax rate

37.4 %

37.5 %

26.1 %

Amortization of intangible assets

$4,501  

$ 6,714  

12. CAPITAL STOCK

Allowance for obsolete inventory 

and Uniform Capitalization

1,546

683  

The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of

100,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per

Accrued liabilities and deferred compensation

1,661  

1,335  

share  and  100,000,000  shares  of  preferred  stock,  $.001

Depreciation

(2,169) 

(2,115) 

Restructuring reserves

91  

113  

Tax credits

2,614  

1,287  

par value per share.  There are no preferred shares issued

or  outstanding.  Under  the  terms  of  the  New  Credit

Facility, the Company may pay dividends in an amount up

to 50% of net income. Holders of common stock have one

Net operating loss carryforwards                                61

   2,646

vote per share.

Net deferred tax asset

$8,305  

$10,663  

In July 2001, the Company completed an additional stock

In  assessing  the  reliability  of  deferred  tax  assets,

offering  of  7.8  million  shares  comprised  of  5.8  million

management  considers,  within  each  taxing  jurisdiction,

shares  sold  by  existing  shareholders  and  2.0  million

whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all

newly  issued  shares.  The  Company  received  $43.6

of  the  deferred  tax  assets  will  not  be  realized.

million  in  net  proceeds  to  be  used  for  general  corporate

Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred

purposes including acquisitions and debt reduction.

tax  liabilities,  projected  future  taxable  income,  and  tax

On  September  29,  2000,  the  Company  conducted  its

planning  strategies  in  making  this  assessment.  Based

Initial  Public  Offering.  Together  with  the  underwriter’s

upon  the  Initial  Public  Offering  and  simultaneous

over-allotment,  the  Company  issued  5,750,000  shares  in

reduction of indebtedness and interest expense, as well as

October  2000  and  realized  proceeds  of  approximately

projections  for  future  taxable  income  over  the  years  in

$84.0 million, net of issuance costs.

which  the  deferred  assets  are  deductible,  management

believes it is more likely than not that the Company will

realize  the  benefits  of  these  deductible  differences  at

December 28, 2001.  Accordingly, no valuation allowance

has been recorded.

Subscribed  common  stock  receivable  consisted  of

promissory  notes,  bearing 

interest  at  6.4%  (the

‘‘Applicable  Federal  Rate’’ at  the  time  the  notes  were

issued) extended by the Company to management stock-

holders  to  facilitate  the  purchase  of  336,800  shares  of

The  deferred  tax  asset  ascribed  to  the  amortization

common  stock.  In  connection  with  the  Initial  Public

of intangible assets of $4,501,000 at December 28, 2001

Offering,  the  management  stockholders  tendered  to  the

and  $6,714,000  at  December  29,  2000  is  primarily

Company  the  requisite  number  of  common  stock  shares

attributable 

to 

the  1997  expensing  of  purchased

35

n

o

t

e

s

t

o

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
 
 
■
36

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

at  $16.00  per  share  to  satisfy,  in  full,  the  outstanding

14. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

promissory notes.

The  Company  operates  its  business  in  two  reportable

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

segments:  medical  and  commercial  power  sources.  The

The Company is a party to various legal actions arising in

the  normal  course  of  business.  The  Company  does  not

believe  that  any  such  pending  activities  should  have  a

material  adverse  effect  on  its  results  of  operations  or

financial position.

The  Company  is  a  party  to  various  license  agreements

through 2018 to manufacture and sell components for use

in medical implants and various commercial applications.

Operating  Leases -  The  Company  is  a  party  to  various

operating lease agreements for office and manufacturing

space. The Company incurred operating lease expense of

$909,000,  $834,000  and  $807,000  for  2001,  2000  and

1999, respectively. Included in each year is $211,000 paid

to a related party under a non-cancelable operating lease

which expires in 2006.

The Company is a party to an operating lease to a related

party  under  a  non-cancelable  operating  lease  which

expires in 2006. The Company believes the rental amount

to  be  reflective  of  arms-length,  market-based  rates  for

similar structures.

If all lease extension options are exercised as expected by

Company management, minimum future annual operating

lease payments over the next five years for the Company

are  $575,000  in  2002;  $355,000  in  2003;  $285,000  in

2004; $289,000 in 2005; and $259,000 in 2006.

medical segment designs and manufactures power sources,

capacitors  and  components  used  in  implantable  medical

devices, which are instruments that are surgically inserted

into  the  body  to  provide  diagnosis  or  therapy.  The

commercial  power  sources  segment  designs  and  manu-

factures non-medical power sources for use in aerospace,

oil and gas exploration and oceanographic equipment.

The  Company’s  medical  segment  includes  three  product

lines  that  have  been  aggregated  because  they  share

similar  economic  characteristics  and  similarities  in  the

areas  of  products,  production  processes,  types  of

customers,  methods  of  distribution  and  regulatory

environment.  The  three  product  lines  are  implantable

power sources, capacitors and medical components.

The  reportable  segments  are  separately  managed,  and

their  performance  is  evaluated  based  on  income  from

operations.  Management  defines  segment  income  from

operations  as  gross  prof it  less  costs  and  expenses

attributable  to  segment  specific  selling,  general  and

administrative and research, development and engineering.

Non-segment specific selling, general and administrative

expenses, research, development and engineering expenses,

interest  expense,  intangible  amortization  and  non-

recurring items are not allocated to reportable segments.

Revenues  from  transactions  between  the  two  segments

are  not  significant.  The  accounting  policies  of  the  seg-

ments are the same as those described in Note 2.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   d i s c o v e r   n e w   w a y s   t o   b r i n g   v a l u e   t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

 
 
 
 
■
An analysis and reconciliation of the Company’s business

Net  revenues  by  geographic  area  are  presented  by

segment information to the respective information in the

attributing  revenues  from  external  customers  based  on

consolidated financial statements is as follows:

where the products are sold.

(dollars in thousands)

2001

2000

1999

(dollars in thousands)

2001

2000

1999

Revenues:

Medical

$ 107,654

$ 83,789

$69,224  

United States

$ 92,391

$68,179

$58,644  

Revenues by geographic area:

Commercial power sources

  27,921

14,001

 10,011

Foreign countries

  43,184

29,611

20,591

Total revenues

$ 135,575

$ 97,790

$79,235  

Consolidated revenues

$135,575

$97,790

$79,235

Segment income from operations:

Medical

$ 39,008

$ 30,005

$29,006  

Commercial power sources

    8,796

   3,494

  2,711

Total segment income from operations

47,804

33,499 

31,717  

Unallocated

(29,274)

(31,868)

(34,031)

Long-lived assets:

United States

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

$188,645

$151,706  

Income (loss) before income taxes

$  18,530

$   1,631

$(2,314) 

Foreign countries                                                      -

          -

Depreciation and amortization:

Medical

$   5,243

$   4,826

$ 3,699  

Commercial power sources

      536

     377

    301

Total depreciation included in segment 

income from operations

5,779

5,203

4,000  

Consolidated long-lived assets

$188,645  

$151,706  

Two  customers  accounted  for  approximately  66%,  65%

and 64% of sales for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Two  customers  accounted  for  approximately  52%  and

52%  of  the  outstanding  accounts  receivable  as  of

Unallocated depreciation and amortization

    8,150

   6,899

   7,363

December 28, 2001 and December 29, 2000, respectively.

Total depreciation and amortization

$ 13,929

$ 12,102

$11,363  

Expenditures for tangible long-lived assets,

excluding acquisitions:

Medical

$   7,074 

$   4,061

$ 6,700  

Commercial power sources                                      504

     82

     72

Total reportable segments

7,578

4,143

6,772  

Unallocated long-lived tangible assets

    2,137

   385

 1,680

Total expenditures

$ 

9,715

$   4,528 

$ 8,452

December 28,

December 29,

2001

2000

Identifiable assets, net:

Medical

$  63,510 

$  44,320  

Commercial power sources

Total reportable segments

Unallocated assets

Total assets

  16,177

79,687

203,833

    9,673

53,993  

127,654

$283,520

$181,647  

37

n

o

t

e

s

t

o

c

o

n

s

o

l

i

d

a

t

e

d

f

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

s

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

 
 
 
 
■
38

s

t

n

e

m

e

t

a

t

s

l

a

i

c

n

a

n

i

f

d

e

t

a

d

i

l

o

s

n

o

c

o

t

s

e

t

o

n

15. QUARTERLY SALES AND EARNINGS DATA - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except per share data)

4th Qtr.

3rd Qtr.

2nd Qtr.

1st Qtr.

2001

Revenues

$34,692

$38,325

$32,987

$29,571  

Gross profit

15,591

16,648

14,609

14,011  

Income before extraordinary loss

2,711

3,312  

2,649

2,919  

Net income (loss)

2,711

3,312

2,649

(75)(a)

Earnings per share before

extraordinary loss - basic

Earnings per share before

extraordinary loss - diluted

Earnings per share - basic

Earnings per share - diluted

2000

Revenues

0.13

0.17

0.14

0.16  

0.13

0.13

0.13

0.16

0.17

0.16

0.14

0.14

0.14

0.15  

0.00  

0.00  

$27,950

$23,256

$23,408

$23,176  

Gross profit

12,419

9,726

9,959

10,240  

Income (loss) before 

extraordinary loss

2,656

(860)

(383)

(393) 

Net income (loss)

1,088(c)

(860)

(383)

(393) 

Earnings (loss) per share before

extraordinary loss - basic

0.14

(0.07)

(0.03)

(0.03) 

Earnings (loss) per share before

extraordinary loss - diluted

Earnings (loss) per share - basic(b)

0.14

0.06

(0.07)

(0.03)

(0.03) 

(0.07)

(0.03)

(0.03) 

Earnings (loss) per share - diluted(b)

0.06

(0.07)

(0.03)

(0.03) 

(a) Amount includes an extraordinary loss for the extinguishment of debt in the amount of                   

$2,994,000, net of tax.

(b) Per share data has been restated for all periods to reflect a one for three reverse stock split 
effective May 18, 2000 and a three for five reverse stock split effective August 15, 2000.
(c) Amount includes an extraordinary loss for the extinguishment of debt in the amount of   

$1,568,000, net of tax.

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   p r o v i d e   a   b e t t e r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e

 
 
 
 
■
TRANSFER AGENT:

GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS:

9645 Wehrle Drive

Clarence, NY  14031

716-759-6901

INVESTOR RELATIONS:

Shareholders and financial analysts may direct any

correspondence for WGT to 

10,000 Wehrle Drive, Clarence, NY  14031

Fax:  716-759-5672

Phone or email: 

Ernest J. Norman, Esq.

Director of Investor Relations and Corporate

Communications 

Assistant Secretary

716-759-5689

enorman@greatbatch.com

WEBSITE:

Information about Wilson Greatbatch Technologies can

be found on our web page at www.greatbatch.com

FORM 10-K

A copy of WGT’s Form 10-K as filed with the Securities

and Exchange Commission can be obtained by calling

the Assistant Secretary’s Office at 716-759-5689, or it

can be obtained through our website at

www.greatbatch.com

Please direct questions about address changes, stock

transfers, lost or stolen certificates, and any other

account questions to:

Mellon Investor Services

44 Wall Street, 6th Floor 

New York, NY  10005

917-320-6240

STOCK LISTING:

New York Stock Exchange (Stock Symbol: GB)

Price Range of WGT Stock

2001 Fiscal Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr.

High

Low

Close

$ 28.00

$ 33.38

$ 29.30

$ 38.85

$ 18.50

$ 17.26

$ 23.00

$ 25.50

$ 18.99

$ 29.00

$ 29.30

$ 36.51

2000 Fiscal Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr.

High

Low

Close

-

-

-

-

-

-

$ 22.88

$ 29.88

$ 22.88

$ 21.75

$ 22.88

$ 28.25

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS:

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Buffalo, NY

CORPORATE COUNSEL:

Hodgson Russ LLP

One M&T Plaza, Suite 2000 

Buffalo, NY  

ANNUAL MEETING:

The Annual Meeting will be held on 

Friday, May 17, 2002 

at Samuel’s Grande Manor

8750 Main Street

Williamsville, NY  14221

39

s

h

a

r

e

h

o

l

d

e

r

i

n

f

o

r

m

a

t

i

o

n

 
■
40

t

n

e

m

e

g

a

n

a

m

d

n

a

s

r

o

t

c

e

r

i

d

f

o

d

r

a

o

b

BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

Robert E. Rich, Jr., Director(a)

President

Rich Products Corporation

MANAGEMENT:

Edward F. Voboril

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

Susan M. Bratton

Bill R. Sanford, Director(a)

Vice President, Corporate Quality

Chairman

SYMARK LLC

V.W. Brinkerhoff, III

Vice President

William B. Summers, Jr., Director(a)(b)

General Manager, Implantable Capacitors 

Chairman

McDonald Investments, Inc.

Peter H. Soderberg, Director

President

Welch Allyn, Inc. 

Edward F. Voboril, Chairman of the Board

President & CEO

Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc.

Henry Wendt, Director(b)

Chairman

Computerized Medical Systems, Inc.

(a) Member of the Audit Committee
(b) Member of the Compensation Committee

Larry T. DeAngelo

Senior Vice President, Administration and Secretary

Steven J. Ebel

General Manager, Electrochem 

Frank J. Forkl, Jr., CPA

Controller

Curtis F. Holmes, PhD

Group Vice President, Components Group

Ricky S. Kline

General Manager, Engineered Components

Gary G. Moore

General Manager, Greatbatch-Sierra, Inc.

Ernest J. Norman, Esq.

Assistant Secretary

William M. Paulot

General Manager, Emerging Technologies

Robert C. Rusin

General Manager, Implantable Power Sources

Peter E. Samek

Vice President, Corporate Development

Esther S. Takeuchi, PhD

Vice President, Research and Development

David E. Waters

Vice President, Marketing

e n •a¯´bl´i n g t o   a p p l y   t e c h n o l o g y   t o   g r e a t e r   c h a l l e n g e s

■