2012 Annual Report
Dear Shareholders:
Progress. It signifies tangible, forward momentum in pursuit of a goal, yet it also recognizes that more
work lies ahead. Progress is how we define a strong 2012 – a year that has seen us make strides in our
long-term growth strategy, taking needed actions for continued sustainability while also beginning to
enjoy the positive outcomes of our market-focused approach.
Our efforts have been centered on continually strengthening three aspects of the business that can most
affect profitable growth: our bottom line, our top line and our pipeline. We delivered. Adjusted operating
income grew 9 percent, driven by a 14 percent increase in sales to $646.2 million. Our pipeline is solid
and becoming even more robust, while at the same time benefitting from more focused investments.
Such progress illustrates that we’re more than capable of meeting our 2013 targets: 7-13 percent
adjusted diluted EPS growth; 5-8 percent annual organic revenue growth; and to be at the 75th
percentile of total shareholder return among our peer group.
Business Performance - During 2012, our two percent increase in
cardiac and neuromodulation sales exceeded expectations,
benefitting from further adoption of our proprietary technology
component products and deepening customer relationships. Over the
long term, we anticipate an increased pace of product development
opportunities from our cardiac and neurostimulation customers, which
– when combined with enhanced sales and marketing – will allow the
Company to grow this product line faster than the overall market.
Our vascular sales grew 15 percent due to underlying market growth
and share gains, including a 47 percent increase in medical devices
carrying the Greatbatch brand.
We took aggressive steps to turn around our orthopaedic business,
which experienced an 8 percent constant currency sales decline
created by fewer customer product launches and development
opportunities because of operational issues. By the end of 2012, we
began moving production from Switzerland to existing Greatbatch
Medical facilities in the U.S. and Mexico and expect to realize the
benefits in 2013 and beyond.
●
●
●
“Our pipeline has
great potential with
our medical device
technology
investments having
been intently focused
toward our core
products; our
innovative and
internally developed
spinal cord
stimulation system,
Algostim; and high
growth portable
medical markets.”
●
●
●
Electrochem revenue continues to exceed our expectations, increasing by $83.3 million, primarily
attributable to our acquisition of Micro Power Electronics, Inc. in December 2011 and product launches
into the higher growth portable medical market. This sector is not only benefiting from an aging
population, but also the shifting of patient care from clinical settings to the home. The resulting need for
lightweight and portable devices for patients and caregivers dovetails with our unique strengths.
Research, Development & Engineering - Ongoing rationalization during 2012 helped us control our net
research, development and engineering expenses, which totaled $52.5 million. Our pipeline has great
potential, with our medical device technology investments having been intently focused toward our core
products; our innovative and internally developed spinal cord stimulation system, Algostim; and high
growth portable medical markets.
Our acquisition of NeuroNexus delivered intellectual property and know-how, supporting QiG Group’s
development of innovative neural interface systems. We’re identifying strategic partners to share RD&E
costs, deepening our development relationships. And in instances where we have technologies that are
not a part of our strategic objectives, we’re taking steps to monetize those assets.
Enhanced Sales and Marketing Capability - With an eye toward capturing greater market share
worldwide, we enhanced our sales and marketing capabilities during the past year. Our new model,
blending proven leaders and highly knowledgeable teams in the field, is customer-centered in its design
and execution, helping us more nimbly and effectively predict, develop and bring to market more high-
demand, high-margin products.
As a result, we continue to negotiate long-term agreements with our major OEM customers, while at the
same time actively filling our component and device opportunity pipeline from those relationships.
Commitment to our Associates and their Well-Being - We’re fortunate to have talented and dedicated
Associates driving our growth every day. They are an integral part of our strategy and we are
committed to providing them with the support they need.
That’s why Greatbatch instituted a comprehensive and targeted health and wellness program for our
U.S. Associates three years ago. By utilizing innovative health care tools such as a consumer driven
health plan, health savings accounts and the Greatbatch Wellness Program, we provide our Associates
with more control and flexibility over their health care spending and personal well-being.
I’m pleased to report that this initiative has been received enthusiastically. All of our U.S. sites
exceeded 80 percent participation for biometric screenings; the company continues to outperform the
market in realizing low, single-digit medical inflation; and our Associates and their spouses are
engaging in more physical activity. We look forward to introducing the Greatbatch Wellness Program to
our Associates in France and Mexico in future years.
As our progress continues, everyone at Greatbatch remains guided by our vision: to be the definitive
leader in critical technologies by infusing integrity, innovation and operational excellence into the
medical device and commercial markets.
Of course, bringing this vision to life requires more than just the commitment of our teams, our partners,
and our customers. It requires the ongoing support of our investors, who share one of our core beliefs:
a passion for mutual success. That’s why our leadership team and I pledge to keep you informed of our
advancement, including enhanced guidance and quarterly reconfirmation.
With definitive actions, forward-looking decisions and smart investments made during the past year,
we’re moving confidently and optimistically into 2013. We’re fortunate to have a highly capable team
across all aspects of the business, deepening and broadening relationships with customers, an
increasing pace of innovation, and the strategies to convert this combination into commercial success.
Progress indeed.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Hook
President & Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2012
Commission File Number 1-16137
GREATBATCH, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
16-1531026
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2595 Dallas Parkway
Suite 310
Frisco, Texas 75034
(Address of principal executive offices)
(716) 759-5600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class:
Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-
accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ―large accelerated filer,‖ ―accelerated
filer‖ and ―smaller reporting company‖ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
Non- accelerated filer [ ]
Accelerated filer [X]
Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 29, 2012 (the last
business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), based on the last sale price of
$22.71, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange: $527.9 million. Solely for the purpose of this
calculation, shares held by directors and officers and 10 percent shareholders of the registrant have been
excluded. Such exclusion should not be deemed a determination by or an admission by the registrant that
these individuals are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.
Shares of common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2013: 23,755,208
Portions of the following document are specifically incorporated by reference into the indicated parts of this
report:
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
Part III, Item 10
Part
―Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance‖
Part III, Item 11
―Executive Compensation‖
Part III, Item 12
―Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters‖
Part III, Item 13
―Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence‖
Part III, Item 14
―Principal Accountant Fees and Services‖
ITEM
NUMBER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
PAGE
NUMBER
1
1A
1B
2
3
4
5
6
7
Business ...................................................................................................................................................
Risk Factors .............................................................................................................................................
Unresolved Staff Comments ...................................................................................................................
Properties .................................................................................................................................................
Legal Proceedings ...................................................................................................................................
Mine Safety Disclosures ..........................................................................................................................
PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities .................................................................................................................................................
Selected Financial Data ...........................................................................................................................
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ..................
7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ................................................................
8
9
9A
9B
10
11
12
13
14
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .......................................................................................
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ................
Controls and Procedures ..........................................................................................................................
Other Information ....................................................................................................................................
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance ......................................................................
Executive Compensation .........................................................................................................................
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence ........................................
Principal Accountant Fees and Services .................................................................................................
15
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ...........................................................................................
Signatures ................................................................................................................................................
PART IV
4
22
31
32
33
33
33
35
36
65
67
128
129
130
130
130
130
130
130
131
132
- 3 -
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
PART I
OVERVIEW
Greatbatch, Inc. was founded in 1970 and is a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1997. When used in
this report, the terms ―Greatbatch,‖ ―we,‖ ―us,‖ ―our‖ and the ―Company‖ mean Greatbatch, Inc. and its
subsidiaries. The Company conducted its initial public offering in 2000.
We operate our business in two reportable segments – Implantable Medical and Electrochem Solutions
(―Electrochem‖). The Company’s customers include large multi-national original equipment
manufacturers (―OEMs‖). The Implantable Medical segment is comprised of our Greatbatch Medical
and QiG Group brands and designs and manufactures medical devices and components for the cardiac,
neuromodulation, vascular and orthopaedic markets. The Implantable Medical segment offers complete
medical devices including design, development, manufacturing, regulatory submission and supporting
worldwide distribution, which is facilitated through the QiG Group and leverages the component
technology of Greatbatch Medical. The devices designed and developed by the QiG Group are
manufactured by Greatbatch Medical. The Implantable Medical segment also offers value-added
assembly and design engineering services for its component products.
Electrochem provides industry-leading total power solutions for rechargeable and non-rechargeable
battery power systems, charging and docking stations, and power supplies, for critical applications in the
portable medical and energy markets, where safety, reliability, quality and innovation are critical.
Electrochem’s product lines cover a number of highly-customized battery-powered applications in
remote and demanding environments, including down hole drilling tools and in life-saving and life-
enhancing applications, including automated external defibrillators, portable oxygen concentrators,
ventilators and powered surgical tools, among others.
Since Greatbatch, Inc. was incorporated, it has completed the following acquisitions either directly or
indirectly through one of its subsidiaries:
Acquisition Date
Acquired Company
Business at Time of Acquisition
July 1997
Wilson Greatbatch Ltd.
August 1998
Hittman Materials and Medical
Components, Inc.
August 2000
Battery Engineering, Inc.
Founded in 1970, designed and manufactured
batteries for implantable medical and commercial
applications.
Founded in 1962, designed and manufactured
ceramic and glass feedthroughs and specialized
porous coatings for electrodes used in implantable
medical devices (―IMDs‖).
Founded in 1983, designed and manufactured
high-energy density batteries for industrial,
commercial, military and medical applications.
- 4 -
Acquisition Date
Acquired Company
Business at Time of Acquisition
June 2001
Sierra-KD Components division
of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.
July 2002
Globe Tool and Manufacturing
Company, Inc.
Founded in 1986, designed and manufactured
ceramic electromagnetic filtering capacitors and
integrated them with wire feedthroughs for use in
IMDs as well as military, aerospace and
commercial applications.
Founded in 1954, designed and manufactured
precision enclosures used in IMDs and
commercial products used in the aerospace,
electronics and automotive sectors.
March 2004
NanoGram Devices Corporation Founded in 1996, developed nanoscale materials
April 2007
BIOMEC, Inc.
June 2007
Enpath Medical, Inc.
October 2007
IntelliSensing LLC
November 2007
Quan Emerteq LLC
November 2007
Engineered Assemblies
Corporation
January 2008
P Medical Holding SA
February 2008
DePuy Orthopaedics’
Chaumont, France
manufacturing facility
for battery and medical device applications.
Established in 1998, provided medical device
design and component integration to early-stage
and established customers.
Founded in 1981, designed, developed, and
manufactured venous introducers and dilators,
implantable leadwires, steerable sheaths and
steerable catheters.
Founded in 2005, designed and manufactured
battery-powered wireless sensing solutions for
commercial applications.
Founded in 1998, designed, developed, and
manufactured catheters, stimulation leadwires,
microcomponents and assemblies.
Founded in 1984, designed and integrated custom
battery solutions and electronics focused on
rechargeable systems for industrial, commercial,
military and portable medical applications.
Founded in 1994, designed, manufactured and
supplied delivery systems, instruments and
implants for the orthopaedic industry.
Manufactured hip and shoulder implants for
DePuy Orthopaedics.
December 2011 Micro Power Electronics, Inc.
(―Micro Power‖)
Founded in 1990, designed custom battery packs,
smart chargers and power supplies for industrial,
military and portable medical applications.
- 5 -
Acquisition Date
Acquired Company
Business at Time of Acquisition
February 2012
NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc.
(―NeuroNexus‖)
Founded in 2004, medical device design firm
specializing in developing neural interface
technology, components and systems.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT YEAR END
We utilize a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st. Fiscal years
2012, 2011 and 2010 ended on December 28, 2012, December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. Fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 contained fifty-two weeks.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate our business in two reportable segments – Implantable Medical and Electrochem. Segment
information including sales from external customers, profit or loss, and assets by segment as well as sales
from external customers and long-lived assets by geographic area are set forth at Note 19 ―Business
Segment, Geographic and Concentration Risk Information‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL
Cardiac and neuromodulation – Component products include batteries, capacitors, filtered and unfiltered
feedthroughs, engineered components, implantable stimulation leads and enclosures used in IMDs.
Additionally, we offer value-added assembly for these IMDs. An IMD is an instrument that is surgically
inserted into the body to provide diagnosis and/or therapy. One sector of the IMD market is cardiac, which
is comprised of devices such as implantable pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (―ICD‖),
cardiac resynchronization therapy (―CRT‖) devices, and cardiac resynchronization therapy with backup
defibrillation devices (―CRT-D‖). Another sector of the IMD market is neuromodulation, which is
comprised of pacemaker-type devices that stimulate nerves for the treatment of various conditions. Beyond
established therapies of pain control, incontinence and movement disorders (Parkinson’s disease and
epilepsy), nerve stimulation for the treatment of other disabilities such as migraines, obesity and depression
has shown promising results.
The following table sets forth the main categories of battery-powered IMDs and the principal illness or
symptoms treated by each device:
Device
Pacemakers .......................................................
ICDs ..................................................................
CRT/CRT-Ds ....................................................
Neurostimulators ...............................................
Principal Illness or Symptom
Abnormally slow heartbeat (Bradycardia)
Rapid and irregular heartbeat (Tachycardia)
Congestive heart failure
Chronic pain, movement disorders, epilepsy, obesity or
depression
Hearing loss
Cochlear hearing devices ..................................
IMD systems generally include an implantable pulse generator (―IPG‖) and one or more stimulation
leads. An IPG is a battery powered device that produces electrical pulses. The lead then carries this
electrical pulse from the IPG to the heart, spinal cord or other location in the body. Our portfolio of
proprietary technologies, products and capabilities has been built to provide our cardiac and
neuromodulation customers with a single source for the vast majority of the components and
subassemblies required to manufacture an IPG or lead, to include complete lead systems. Our
- 6 -
® primary battery and capacitor lines, which have enabled our OEM partners to make
investments in research and development have generated proprietary products such as the QHR
and QCapacitor
improvements in their system offerings in terms of device reliability, size, longevity and power. Our
Xcellion™ line of Lithium-Ion rechargeable batteries leverages decades of implantable battery research,
development and manufacturing expertise. This line of cells now includes the optional CoreGuard™
feature, which enables batteries to discharge to zero volts without performance degradation.
®, QMR
®
Despite the current global market challenges for this industry, we believe that the cardiac and
neuromodulation markets continue to exhibit fundamentals that position this product line for growth,
which will be driven by the following factors:
Growing patient population – Implantable pacemakers and ICDs remain primary therapies for a
number of critical clinical conditions, most of which are non-elective in nature. As the prevalence of
many of these clinical conditions increase with age, underlying population demographics in
developed countries will provide an engine for procedure growth.
Focus on emerging markets - OEM's have increased their focus and investment to expand physicians
awareness of these life changing therapies, which we believe will result in increased utilization to
improve quality of life for more patients globally. These growth initiatives will drive increased
utilization of existing cardiac technologies and provide an avenue for new device and technology
development as device manufacturers look to develop unique products for these markets.
Trends in device features – IMD evolution continues to favor the development of smaller, longer
lasting devices with increased functionality and more physiologic shapes. Innovative battery,
capacitor, enclosure, and filtering solutions such as those provided by Greatbatch Medical are
critical to the realization of these market needs.
Growth within neuromodulation – Neuromodulation applications continue to grow at a faster pace
than traditional markets, and are expected to continue to expand as new therapeutic applications are
identified. The 2012 fiscal year experienced continued growth in clinical data supporting new
applications and a growing focus and excitement from clinicians looking for treatment alternatives
for challenging patient conditions. Additionally, core neuromodulation markets - like spinal cord
stimulation - that rely significantly on patients for co-pays, are positioned to see stronger growth as
global economic markets strengthen. Many cardiac OEM companies are also OEMs in the
neuromodulation market, which positions us to capitalize on both drivers of market growth.
Vascular – Products include introducers, specialty medical coatings, steerable sheaths and catheters that
deliver therapies for many end-user markets including coronary and neurovascular disease, peripheral
vascular disease, interventional radiology, vascular access, atrial fibrillation, and interventional
cardiology, as well as products for medical imaging and drug and pharmaceutical delivery. Several of
these markets are expected to experience significant global growth over the next few years. Introducers
enable physicians to create a conduit through which they can insert infusion catheters, implantable ports,
pacemaker leads and other therapeutic devices into a blood vessel. A catheter is a tube that can be
inserted into a blood vessel to allow drainage, injection of fluids, or access by surgical instruments.
Our products seek to capitalize on the growth in the cardiac, neurology and vascular markets, especially
since many of the large cardiac OEMs are also in the vascular markets. This gives us an opportunity to
develop close strategic partnerships that can be leveraged across markets, an opportunity that will grow in
significance as OEMs continue to consolidate their operating divisions. In addition to those factors that
are driving the cardiac and neuromodulation markets, increased demand is also being driven by continued
focus on minimally invasive procedures. Patients and healthcare providers are looking for minimally
invasive technologies to treat disease. They are expanding the use of catheter based procedures and
- 7 -
associated vascular therapies. We also continue to see strong growth in the vascular markets because of
peripheral-vascular disease therapies and new indications for tissue extraction or ablation.
Orthopaedic – Products include hip and shoulder joint reconstruction implants, bone plates and spinal
devices, and instruments and delivery systems used in hip and knee replacement, trauma fixation and
spine surgeries. Orthopaedic implants are used in reconstructive surgeries to replace or repair hips, knees
and other joints, such as shoulders, ankles and elbows that have deteriorated as a result of disease or
injury. Trauma implant systems are used primarily to reattach or stabilize damaged bone or tissue while
the body heals. Spinal implant systems are used by orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in the
treatment of degenerative diseases, deformities and injuries in various regions of the spine.
Each implant system typically has an associated instrument set that is used in the surgical procedure to
insert that specific implant system. Instruments included in a set vary by implant system. Usually,
instrument sets are sterilized after each use and then reused, however, recent trends are moving towards
single use instrumentation. Cases are used to store, transport and arrange implant systems and other
medical devices and related surgical instruments. Cases are generally designed to allow for sterilization
and re-use after an implant or other surgical procedure is performed. The majority of cases are tailored for
specific implant procedures so that the instruments, implants and other devices are arranged within the
case to match the order of use in the procedure and are securely held in clearly labeled, custom-formed
pockets.
Many of the factors affecting the orthopaedic market segment are similar to the cardiac and vascular
markets and include:
Aging population in developed markets - Conditions like osteoarthritis and spine degeneration are
underlying drivers of a diverse spectrum of reconstructive therapies, and increase significantly
with age. Continued growth in the 65+ population, along with an increased desire to remain
active, will provide a driver for procedural growth.
Rates of obesity - Rates of obesity globally have continued to rise, and are expected to do so for
the foreseeable future. Excess weight carriage exacerbates wear on joints and will drive the need
for replacement and revision procedures.
New implant and surgical technology - The orthopaedic market continues to see a growing focus
on minimally invasive procedures across a number of sectors including joint reconstruction and
spinal fusion, potentially expanding the use of these therapeutic approaches.
Growth in emerging markets - Growing affluence in emerging markets has provided an
opportunity for global growth of a number of orthopaedic procedures. Patient populations outside
of developed markets continue to be underpenetrated, and investment from large device
manufacturers in these markets will provide for procedural growth of established therapies.
The following table summarizes information about our Implantable Medical component products:
Product
Description
Principal Product Attributes
Batteries
Lithium iodine (―Li Iodine‖)
Lithium silver vanadium oxide (―Li SVO‖)
Lithium carbon monoflouride (―Li CFx‖)
Lithium ion rechargeable (―Li Ion‖)
Lithium SVO/CFx (―QHR‖ & ―QMR‖)
High reliability and predictability
Long service life
Customized configuration
Light weight
High energy density, small size
- 8 -
Product
Capacitors
EMI filters
Description
Principal Product Attributes
Storage for energy generated by a battery
before delivery to the heart. Used in ICDs
and CRT-Ds.
Stores more energy per unit volume
(energy density) than other existing
technologies
Customized configuration
Filters electromagnetic interference to limit
undesirable response, malfunctioning or
degradation in the performance of electronic
equipment
High reliability attenuation of EMI RF
over wide frequency ranges
Customized design
Feedthroughs
Allow electrical signals to be brought from
inside hermetically sealed IMD to an
electrode
Coated electrodes
Deliver electric signal from the feedthrough
to a body part undergoing stimulation
Ceramic to metal seal is substantially
more durable than traditional seals
Multifunctional
High quality coated surface
Flexible in utilizing any combination
of biocompatible coating surfaces
Customized offering of surfaces and
tips
Precision
components
Machined
Molded and over molded products
High level of manufacturing precision
Broad manufacturing flexibility
Enclosures and
related
components
Titanium
Stainless steel
Value-added
assemblies
Combination of multiple components in a
single package/unit
Stimulation leads
Cardiac, neuromodulation and hearing
restoration stimulation leads
Precision manufacturing, flexibility in
configurations and materials
Leveraging products and capabilities
to provide subassemblies and
assemblies
Provides synergies in component
technology and procurement systems
Custom and unique configurations that
increase therapy effectiveness, provide
finished device design and
manufacturing
Introducers
Creates a conduit to insert infusion catheters,
guidewires, implantable ports, pacemaker
leads and other therapeutic devices into a
blood vessel
Variety of sizes and materials that
facilitate problem-free access in a
variety of clinical applications
- 9 -
Product
Description
Principal Product Attributes
Catheters
Delivers therapeutic devices to specific sites
in the body
Cases and trays
Delivery systems for cleaning and sterilizing
orthopaedic instruments and implants
Implants
Orthopaedic implants for reconstructive hip,
knee, shoulder, trauma and spine procedures
Instruments
Orthopaedic instruments for reconstructive
and trauma procedures
Enable safe, simple delivery of
therapeutic and diagnostic devices,
soft tip and steerability
Provide regulatory clearance and
finished device
High degree of customization
Short, predictable development and
production timelines
Precision manufacturing, leveraging
capabilities and products
Complete processes including sterile
packaging and coatings
Designed to improve surgical
techniques, reduce surgery time,
increase surgical precision and
decrease risk of contamination
A majority of the components and devices Implantable Medical sells incorporate proprietary technologies.
These proprietary technologies provide an entry barrier for new competitors, and further limit existing
competitors from duplicating our products. In addition to these proprietary technologies, our proprietary
―know-how‖ in the manufacture of these products provides further barriers to competition.
QiG Group – QiG Group is the research and development arm of our Implantable Medical segment that
was assembled in 2008 to facilitate the development of complete medical devices for our Implantable
Medical customers. Within QiG resides tremendous talent, resources and capacity for innovation within
our organization. Today QiG encompasses 120 research and development professionals working in
facilities in seven states and currently focused on two compelling therapeutic areas: cardiovascular and
neuromodulation. In the long-term will be the addition of orthopaedics. Additionally, QiG has
established relationships with nearly a dozen key physicians who are highly specialized in these areas.
These partnerships are helping us to design medical devices from the ground up with features that will
meet the needs of today’s practicing clinicians.
Within the QiG Group, we are utilizing a disciplined and diversified portfolio approach with three
investment modes— market driven medical devices to be sold or licensed to an OEM partner, OEM driven
medical device initiatives, and strategic equity investments in start-up companies. The QiG Group employs
a disciplined and thorough process for evaluating these opportunities. A scorecard process is utilized to
review and select the most strategically valuable ideas to pursue, taking into account a host of variables
including the market opportunity, regulatory pathway and reimbursement; market need and market
potential; intellectual property and projected financial return.
As a result of the investments we have made, we are able to provide our Implantable Medical customers
with complete medical devices. This includes development through regulatory submissions, as well as
manufacturing and supporting worldwide distribution. These medical devices are full product solutions that
complement our OEM customers’ products and utilize the component expertise and capabilities residing
within Greatbatch Medical. The benefits to our OEM customers include shortening the time to market for
- 10 -
these devices by accelerating the velocity of innovation, optimizing their supply chain and ultimately
providing them with cost efficiencies. Once the QiG Group designs and develops a medical device, it is
manufactured by Greatbatch Medical.
ELECTROCHEM
Electrochem provides customized battery power and management systems, charging and docking stations,
and power supplies to markets where safety, reliability, quality and durability are critical. We design
customized primary (non-rechargeable) and secondary (rechargeable) battery solutions which are used in the
portable medical, energy, military and environmental markets. Electrochem’s primary and secondary power
solutions are used where failure is not an option.
Electrochem’s primary lithium power solutions, which include high, moderate and low rate non-
rechargeable cell solutions, are utilized in extreme conditions and can withstand exceptionally high and low
temperatures, sterilization, and high shock and vibration. Electrochem’s product designs incorporate
protective circuitry, glass-to-metal hermetic seals, fuses and diodes to help ensure safe, durable and reliable
power as devices are subjected to these harsh conditions. Our primary batteries are often used in remote and
demanding environments, including down hole drilling tools, military communication devices,
oceanographic buoys and more.
In addition to primary power solutions, Electrochem offers customized secondary or rechargeable battery
packs, in a diverse range of chemistries for critical applications requiring rechargeable solutions.
Rechargeable chemistries include lithium ion, lithium ion polymer, nickel metal hydride, nickel cadmium,
lithium iron phosphate and sealed lead acid. Electrochem’s rechargeable battery packs include advanced
electronics, smart charging and battery management systems and are used in critical and life-saving
applications, including automated external defibrillators, ventilators, powered surgical instruments and
portable oxygen concentrators, among others.
In 2012, Electrochem significantly grew its market position, particularly in the portable medical space.
After acquiring Micro Power Electronics, Inc. in late 2011, Electrochem broadened its technical capabilities,
expanded its geographic locations and expanded its market penetration with customers who require
specialized portable power solutions for use in critical applications.
Gaining better access to the portable medical market was one of the main drivers behind our acquisition of
Micro Power as it provides us with a significant opportunity for growth given its $400 million market size.
Additionally, this market is benefiting from favorable market trends as patient care shifts from clinical
settings to the home and as an aging population drives the need for lightweight and portable devices for
patients and caregivers. These favorable trends are expected to allow this market to grow over 6% annually
for the next several years, which is well above our legacy market growth rates. Finally, this market is also
attractive to us given that it has long product life cycles that will provide stability and diversification to our
revenue base.
- 11 -
The following table summarizes information about our Electrochem products:
Product
Description
Principal Product Attributes
Primary cells
Low-rate
Moderate-rate
High rate (spiral)
Primary and
secondary battery
packs
Highly-customized pack
solutions
Optimized rate capability, shock and vibration
resistant, high and low temperature tolerant,
high energy density
Diverse portfolio of cells in various sizes,
temperature ranges and rate capabilities,
custom-engineered and designed, value-add
charging and battery management systems for
secondary packs
- 12 -
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Our position as a leading developer and manufacturer of components for IMDs and Electrochem batteries is
largely the result of our long history of technological innovation. We invest substantial resources in
research, development and engineering. Our scientists, engineers and technicians focus on improving
existing products, expanding the use of our products and developing new products. In addition to our
internal technology and product development efforts, we also engage outside research institutions for unique
technology projects. In order to facilitate the development of new and improved medical devices, in 2008
we significantly increased our investments in research and development. Investments in medical device
products, which are being facilitated through the QiG Group, totaled $33.9 million, $27.3 million and $21.9
million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Further information regarding the QiG Group is set forth
under the Implantable Medical segment description of this Item 1 and ―Product Development‖ section of
Item 7 of this report.
PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY
We rely on a combination of patents, licenses, trade secrets and know-how to establish and protect our
proprietary rights to our technologies and products. Often, several patents covering various aspects of the
design protect a single product. We believe this provides broad protection of the inventions employed.
As of December 28, 2012, we have 541 active U.S. patents and 367 active foreign patents. We also have
307 U.S. and 286 foreign pending patent applications at various stages of approval. During the past three
years, we have been granted 181 new U.S. patents, 77 of which were granted in 2012. As a result of the
QiG Group’s efforts to develop complete medical devices, the amount of intellectual property being
generated by the Company has accelerated. We currently have 159 pending patent applications and 57
patents have been granted to us relating to our medical devices.
We are also a party to several license agreements with third parties under which we have obtained, on
varying terms, exclusive or non-exclusive rights to patents held by them. An example of these agreements
is for the basic technology used in our wet tantalum capacitors, filtered feedthroughs, biomimetic coatings,
safety needles and MRI compatible lead systems. We have also granted rights to our patents to others under
license agreements.
It is our policy to require our management and technical employees, consultants and other parties having
access to our confidential information to execute confidentiality agreements. These agreements prohibit
disclosure of confidential information to third parties except in specified circumstances. In the case of
employees and consultants, the agreements generally provide that all confidential information relating to our
business is the exclusive property of Greatbatch.
MANUFACTURING AND QUALITY CONTROL
We primarily manufacture small lot sizes, as most customer orders range from a few hundred to a few
thousand units. As a result, our ability to remain flexible is an important factor in maintaining high
levels of productivity. Each of our production teams receives assistance from representatives from our
quality, engineering, manufacturing, materials and procurement departments. Our quality systems are
compliant with and certified to various recognized international standards, requirements and directives.
Our facilities in Alden, NY, and Minneapolis, MN are certified under the International Organization for
Standardization (―ISO‖): 9001 quality system standard, which requires compliance with regulations
regarding product design (where applicable), supplier control, manufacturing processes and component
quality. This certification can only be achieved after completion of an audit conducted by an
independent authority followed by periodic inspections to maintain this certification.
- 13 -
The quality systems of our manufacturing facilities in Tijuana, Mexico, Plymouth, MN, Clarence, NY,
Chaumont, France, Orvin, Switzerland, Ft. Wayne, IN, Indianapolis, IN, Beaverton, OR and Raynham,
MA are certified under the ISO: 13485 quality system standard, which requires, among other things, an
implemented quality system that applies to the design (where applicable) and manufacture of
components, assemblies and finished medical devices, including component quality and supplier control.
Along with ISO: 13485, the facilities (where applicable) are subject to regulation by numerous
government bodies, including the Food and Drug Administration (―FDA‖) and comparable international
regulatory agencies in order to ship product worldwide.
At certain facilities, we are required to register with the FDA and as a result, we are subject to periodic
inspection by the FDA for compliance with their Quality System Regulation (―QSR‖) requirements.
Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review and is monitored
through periodic inspections by the FDA. In the European Community, we are required to maintain
certain ISO certifications in order to sell products, and we undergo periodic inspections by notified
bodies to obtain and maintain these certifications. Maintaining these certifications gives us the ability to
serve as a manufacturing partner to medical device manufacturers, which we believe will improve our
competitive position. Our Plymouth, MN, Ft. Wayne, IN, Indianapolis, IN, Warsaw, IN, Orvin,
Switzerland, Chaumont, France, Tijuana, Mexico, and Beaverton, OR facilities are registered with the
FDA.
SALES AND MARKETING
Products from our Implantable Medical business are sold directly to our customers. In our Electrochem
business, we utilize a combination of direct and indirect sales methods, depending on the particular product.
In 2012, approximately 51% of our products were sold in the U.S. Sales outside the U.S. are primarily to
customers whose corporate offices are located and headquartered in the U.S. Information regarding our
sales by geographic area is set forth at Note 19 ―Business Segment, Geographic and Concentration Risk
Information‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
Although the majority of our medical customers contract with us to develop custom components and
assemblies to fit their product specifications, we also provide system and device solutions ready for market
distribution by OEMs. As a result, we have established close working relationships between our internal
program managers and our customers. We market our products and technologies at industry meetings and
trade shows domestically and internationally.
Internal account executives support all activity and involve engineers and technology professionals in the
sales process to address customer requests appropriately. For system and device solutions, we partner with
our customers’ research, marketing, and clinical groups to jointly develop technology platforms in
alignment with their product roadmaps and therapy needs.
Electrochem utilizes a direct and indirect selling model to OEMs. We have a small number of strategic
partner organizations, which enable us to sell into markets where language or geographical barriers are
present. We leverage our strategic account managers with appropriate support from engineering to design
and sell product solutions into our targeted markets. Our strategic account managers and account executives
are trained to assist our customers in selecting appropriate chemistries and configurations. We market our
products and services through well-defined selling strategies and marketing campaigns that are customized
for each of the industries we target.
- 14 -
Firm backlog orders at December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 were approximately $160 million and
$191 million, respectively. The majority of the orders outstanding at December 28, 2012 are expected to be
shipped within one year.
CUSTOMERS
Our Implantable Medical customers include large multi-national OEMs and their affiliated subsidiaries such
as, in alphabetical order here and throughout this report, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson,
Medtronic, Smith & Nephew, Sorin Group, St. Jude Medical, Stryker and Zimmer. During 2012, 2011, and
2010, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical collectively accounted for
52%, 59% and 62% of our total sales, respectively. We have been successful in leveraging our diversified
product line to further penetrate these customers and selling into more of their operating divisions, which
cover the cardiac, neuromodulation, vascular and orthopaedic markets.
The nature and extent of our selling relationship with each OEM customer is different in terms of breadth of
products purchased, selling prices, product volumes, ordering patterns and inventory management. For
customers with long-term contracts, we have negotiated fixed pricing arrangements for pre-determined volume
levels with pricing fixed at each level. In general, the higher the volume level, the lower the pricing. We have
pricing arrangements with our customers that at times do not specify minimum order quantities. We
recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. This occurs when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, the buyer is obligated to pay us (i.e.
payment is not contingent on a future event), the risk of loss is transferred, there is no obligation of future
performance, collectability is reasonably assured and the amount of future returns can reasonably be estimated.
Those criteria are met at the time of shipment when title passes.
Our visibility to customer ordering patterns is over a relatively short period of time. Our customers may
have inventory management programs, vertical integration plans and/or alternate supply arrangements
which we are unaware of. Additionally, the relative market share among the OEM manufacturers changes
periodically. Consequently, these and other factors can significantly impact our sales in any given period.
Our customers may initiate field actions with respect to market-released products. These actions may
include product recalls or communications with a significant number of physicians about a product or
labeling issue. The scope of such actions can range from very minor issues affecting a small number of
units to more significant actions. There are a number of factors, both short-term and long-term, related to
these field actions that may impact our results. In the short-term, if a product has to be replaced, or
customer inventory levels have to be restored, demand will increase. Also, changing customer order
patterns due to market share shifts or accelerated device replacements may also have a positive or negative
impact on our sales results in the near-term. These same factors may have longer-term implications as well.
Customer inventory levels may ultimately have to be rebalanced to match new demand.
Our Electrochem customers are primarily companies involved in demanding markets where highly
sophisticated power solutions needs exist, such as energy, portable medical, military and environmental.
Some of our larger OEM customers include General Electric, Halliburton Company, Scripps Institution
of Oceanography, Thales, Weatherford International and Zoll Medical Corp.
SUPPLIERS AND RAW MATERIALS
We purchase certain critical raw materials from a limited number of suppliers due to the technically
challenging requirements of the supplied product and/or the lengthy process required to qualify these
materials both internally and with our customers. We cannot quickly establish additional or replacement
suppliers for these materials because of these rigid requirements. For these critical raw materials, we
maintain minimum safety stock levels and contractually partner with suppliers to help ensure the continuity
- 15 -
of supply. Historically, we have not experienced any significant interruptions or delays in obtaining critical
raw materials.
For non-critical raw material purchases, we utilize competitive pricing methods such as bulk purchases,
precious metal pool buys, blanket orders, and long-term contracts to secure supply. We believe that there
are alternative suppliers or substitute products available at competitive prices for all of these non-critical
raw materials.
As discussed more fully in Item 1A ―Risk Factors,‖ our business depends on a continuous supply of raw
materials from a limited number of suppliers. If an unforeseen interruption of supply were to occur, we may
be unable to obtain substitute sources for these raw materials on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us,
which could harm our ability to manufacture our products profitably or on time. Additionally, we may be
unable to quickly establish additional or replacement suppliers for these materials as there are a limited
number of worldwide suppliers.
COMPETITION
Existing and potential competitors in our Implantable Medical segment include leading IMD manufacturers
such as Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Smith & Nephew, Sorin Group, St.
Jude Medical, Stryker and Zimmer that currently have vertically integrated operations and may expand their
vertical integration capability in the future. Competitors also include independent suppliers who typically
specialize in one type of component. Competition for Electrochem varies and is dependent on the targeted
industry. Our known non-vertically integrated competitors include the following:
Product Line
Competitors
Implantable Medical
Medical batteries
Eagle-Picher
Quallion
Capacitors
Critical Medical Components
Feedthroughs
Alberox (subsidiary of The Morgan Crucible Co. PLC)
EMI filtering
Enclosures
Machined and molded
components
AVX (subsidiary of Kyocera)
Eurofarad
Heraeus
Hudson
National
Numerous
Value added assembly
Numerous
Catheters
Creganna
Teleflex
- 16 -
Product Line
Competitors
Introducers
Pressure Products
Theragenics (Galt)
Merit Medical
Stimulation leads
Oscor
Orthopaedic trays,
instruments and implants
Electrochem
Primary Power Solutions
Accelent
Avalign Technologies
IMDS
Micropulse, Inc.
Norwood Medical
Orchid
Sandvik
Symmetry
Paragon
Tecomet
Tracer Technologies
Engineered Power
Saft
Ultralife
Secondary Power Solutions Totex
Palladium
ICC
Nexergy
Ultralife
Saft
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Except as described below, our business is not subject to direct governmental regulation other than the
laws and regulations generally applicable to all businesses in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We
are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing the emission,
discharge, use, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and the remediation of contamination
associated with the release of these materials at our facilities and at off-site disposal locations. Our
manufacturing and research, development and engineering activities may involve the controlled use of
small amounts of hazardous materials. Liabilities associated with hazardous material releases arise
principally under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
and analogous state laws that impose strict, joint and several liabilities on owners and operators of
contaminated facilities and parties that arrange for the off-site disposal of hazardous materials. We are not
aware of any material noncompliance with the environmental laws currently applicable to our business
and we are not subject to any material claim for liability with respect to contamination at any Company
facility or any off-site location. We may, however, become subject to these environmental liabilities in
the future as a result of our historic or current operations.
Our products are subject to regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA and
comparable foreign agencies. For some of our component technology, we have ―master files‖ on record
- 17 -
with the FDA. Master files may be used to provide proprietary and confidential detailed information
about technology, facilities, processes, or articles used in the manufacturing, processing, packaging and
storing of one or more medical device components. These master files for devices may be used by device
manufacturers to support their premarket approval application (―PMA‖), investigational device exemption
application (―IDE‖) or premarket notification (―510(k)‖).
In the U.S., our introducer and delivery catheter products are considered Class II devices. The 510(k) process
requires us to demonstrate that our new medical devices are substantially equivalent to a legally marketed
medical device. In order to support a substantial equivalence claim, we must submit supporting data. In
Europe, these devices are considered Class IIa and Class III, respectively, under European Medical Device
Directives. These Directives require companies that wish to manufacture and distribute medical devices in
European Union member countries to obtain a CE Marking for those products, which indicate that the
products meet minimum standards of performance, essential requirements, safety conformity assessment and
quality.
The PMA process is a more rigorous process that is required to demonstrate that a new medical device is safe
and effective. This is demonstrated by generating data regarding the design, manufacturing processes,
materials, bench testing, and animal testing and typically requiring human clinical data. Some of our products
that we are developing are Class III medical devices that require a PMA or, in the European Union, premarket
approval through submission of a Design Dossier.
As a manufacturer of medical devices and components that go into medical devices, we are also subject to
periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Requirements and the
applicable notified body in the European Union to ensure conformity to the Medical Device Directives and
Active Implantable Medical Device Directives. We believe that our quality controls, development, testing,
manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of our medical devices conform to the requirements of all
pertinent regulations.
Our sales and marketing practices are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services pursuant to federal anti-kickback laws, and are also subject to similar state laws.
We are also subject to various other environmental, transportation and labor laws as well as various other
directives and regulations both in the U.S. and abroad. We believe that compliance with these laws will
not have a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Given the scope
and nature of these laws, however, they may have a material impact on our operational results in the
future.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability
Reconciliation Act (collectively ―Health Care Reform‖) legislated broad-based changes to the U.S. health
care system that could significantly impact our business operations and financial results, including higher or
lower revenue, as well as higher employee medical costs and taxes. Health Care Reform imposes
significant new taxes on medical device OEMs, which will result in a significant increase in the tax burden
on our industry and which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition, results of
operations and our cash flows. Other elements of Health Care Reform such as comparative effectiveness
research, an independent payment advisory board, payment system reforms including shared savings pilots
and other provisions could meaningfully change the way healthcare is developed and delivered, and may
materially impact numerous aspects of our business, results of operations and financial condition. Many
significant parts of Health Care Reform will be phased in over the next several years and require further
guidance and clarification in the form of regulations. Management is currently evaluating the impact that
- 18 -
the new medical device tax will have on our results from operations beginning in 2013, and has
preliminarily estimated that it will reduce gross profit by $1.5 million to $2.5 million. This amount assumes
that this tax applies to the first medical device sale in the U.S. and is based upon a wholesale price.
On August 22, 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (―SEC‖) issued a rule under Section
1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requiring companies to publicly
disclose their use of conflict minerals that originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (―DRC‖) or an
adjoining country. Under the adopted rule, issuers are required to conduct a ―reasonable‖ due-diligence
process to ascertain the source of conflict minerals, defined as tantalum, tin, gold or tungsten, that are
necessary to the functionality or production of their manufactured or contracted to be manufactured
products. Companies are required to provide this disclosure on a new form to be filed with the SEC called
Form SD. Companies are required to file Form SD on May 31, 2014 for the 2013 calendar period and
annually on May 31 every year thereafter. We anticipate additional, new compliance costs to be incurred
since our Implantable Medical business utilizes all of the minerals specified in the rule, which we are unable
to quantify at this time.
RECRUITING AND TRAINING
We invest substantial resources in our recruiting efforts to focus on a quality workforce that will support
our business objectives. Our goal is to provide our associates with growth opportunities by attempting to
fill more than half of our open employment positions internally. We further meet our hiring needs through
outside sources, as required. We have an active succession planning process including a comprehensive
development program in place for senior management in order to ensure we are able to implement our
strategic plan.
We provide training for our associates designed to educate them on safety, quality, business strategy, and
our culture. Our safety training programs educate associates on basic industrial safety practices while
emphasizing the importance of knowing emergency response procedures. Our training programs focus on
the methodologies and technical competencies required to support current and future business needs with
a strong focus on quality and continuous improvement.
Supporting our commitment to learning, we offer our associates tuition reimbursement and encourage
them to continue their education at accredited colleges and universities. We have established a number of
programs designed to challenge and motivate our associates specifically encouraging continuous
improvement, supervisory and leadership skills. We believe ongoing development is necessary to ensure
our associates utilize best practices, and share a common understanding of work practices and
performance expectations.
- 19 -
EMPLOYEES
The following table provides a breakdown of employees as of December 28, 2012:
Manufacturing – U.S.
General and administrative – U.S.
Sales and marketing – U.S.
Research, development and engineering – U.S.
Chaumont, France facility
Switzerland facilities
Tijuana, Mexico facility
Total
1,662
143
57
264
231
157
796
3,310
We also employ a number of temporary employees to assist us with various projects and service functions
and address peaks in staff requirements. Our employees at our Chaumont, France and Tijuana, Mexico
facilities are represented by a union. Approximately 128 and 226 positions at our Switzerland and France
locations, respectively, are manufacturing in nature. The positions at our Tijuana, Mexico facility are
primarily manufacturing. Approximately 25 positions were added as a result of our NeuroNexus
acquisition of which approximately 9 positions are manufacturing and 9 positions are research,
development and engineering in nature. We believe that we have a good relationship with our employees.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Information concerning our executive officers is presented below as of February 27, 2013. The officers’
terms of office run from year to year until the first meeting of the Board of Directors after our Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which meeting takes place immediately following our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, and until their successors are elected and qualified, except in the case of earlier death,
retirement, resignation or removal.
Mauricio Arellano, age 46, is President of Greatbatch Medical and has served in that office since
December 2010. He served as Senior Vice President and Business Leader of our Cardiac and Neurology
Group from October 2008 until December 2010, Senior Vice President and Business Leader of our CRM
and Neuromodulation Group from January 2008 to October 2008, Senior Vice President and Business
Leader of our Medical Solutions Group from November 2006 to January 2008, and as Vice President of
Greatbatch Mexico from January 2005 to November 2006. Mr. Arellano joined our Company in October
2003 as the Plant Manager of our former Carson City, NV facility. Prior to joining our Company, he
served in a variety of human resources and operational roles with Tyco Healthcare – Especialidades
Medicas Kenmex and with Sony de Tijuana Este.
Susan M. Bratton, age 56, is President of Electrochem and has served in that office since December
2012. She had served as Senior Vice President and Business Leader of Electrochem since January 2005.
Ms. Bratton served as Vice President of Corporate Quality from March 2001 to January 2005, as General
Manager of Electrochem from July 1998 to March 2001, and as Director of Procurement from June 1991
to July 1998. She has held various other positions with our Company since joining us in 1976.
Michael Dinkins, age 58, is Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, and has served in that
office since joining our Company in May 2012. From 2008 until May 2012, he was Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of USI Insurance Services, an insurance intermediary company.
From 2005 until 2008, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb Rogal &
Hobbs Co., an insurance and risk management services company. Prior to that, Mr. Dinkins held senior
- 20 -
positions at Guidant Corporation, Access Worldwide Communications, Cadmus Communications Group
and General Electric Company.
Michelle Graham, age 46, is Senior Vice President for Human Resources, and has served in that office
since joining our Company in December 2010. From 2005 until December 2010, she held a number of
senior human resources positions at Bausch & Lomb, most recently as Vice President of Human
Resources for its Global Vision Care division.
Thomas J. Hook, age 50, has served as our President & Chief Executive Officer since August 2006.
Prior to August 2006, he was our Chief Operating Officer, a position he assumed upon joining our
Company in September 2004. From August 2002 until September 2004, Mr. Hook was employed by CTI
Molecular Imaging where he had served as President, CTI Solutions Group.
Daniel R. Kaiser, age 43, is Vice President & Chief Technology Officer. He was appointed to that
position in March 2012. From December 2008 until March 2012, Mr. Kaiser held senior management
roles in marketing and product development for both QiG Group and Greatbatch Medical. Prior to joining
the Company in 2008, he held positions of progressive responsibility developing and commercializing
technology as an adjunct faculty member at the University of Minnesota and with Medtronic, Inc. and
Guidant Corporation.
Timothy G. McEvoy, age 55, is Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary, and has served in that
office since joining our Company in February 2007. From 1992 until January 2007, he was employed in a
variety of legal roles by Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We make available free of charge through our Internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file those reports with, or furnish them to, the SEC. Our Internet address is
www.greatbatch.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this
annual report on Form 10-K and should not be considered a part of this report. These items may also be
obtained free of charge by written request made to Christopher J. Thome, Assistant Corporate Controller –
Reporting and Shared Services, Greatbatch, Inc., 10000 Wehrle Drive, Clarence, New York 14031.
CAUTIONARY FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Some of the statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K and other written and oral
statements made from time to time by us and our representatives are not statements of historical or
current fact. As such, they are ―forward-looking statements‖ within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, and these
statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Forward-looking
statements include statements relating to:
future sales, expenses and profitability;
future development and expected growth of our business and industry;
our ability to execute our business model and our business strategy;
our ability to identify trends within our industries and to offer products and services that meet the
changing needs of those markets; and
projected capital expenditures.
- 21 -
You can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as ―may,‖ ―will,‖ ―should,‖ ―could,‖
―expects,‖ ―intends,‖ ―plans,‖ ―anticipates,‖ ―believes,‖ ―estimates,‖ ―predicts,‖ ―potential‖ or ―continue‖ or
―variations‖ or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only
predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those stated or implied by these forward-
looking statements. In evaluating these statements and our prospects, you should carefully consider the
factors set forth below. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary factors and to others contained throughout this
report. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report or
to conform these statements to actual results.
Although it is not possible to create a comprehensive list of all factors that may cause actual results to differ
from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements or that may affect our future
results, some of these factors include the following: our dependence upon a limited number of customers;
customer ordering patterns; product obsolescence; our inability to market current or future products; pricing
pressure from customers; our ability to timely and successfully implement cost reduction and plant
consolidation initiatives; our reliance on third party suppliers for raw materials, products and
subcomponents; fluctuating operating results; our inability to maintain high quality standards for our
products; challenges to our intellectual property rights; product liability claims; our inability to successfully
consummate and integrate acquisitions and to realize synergies and to operate these acquired businesses in
accordance with expectations; our unsuccessful expansion into new markets; our failure to develop new
products including system and device products; our inability to obtain licenses to key technology; regulatory
changes or consolidation in the healthcare industry; global economic factors including currency exchange
rates and interest rates; the resolution of various legal actions brought against the Company; and other risks
and uncertainties that arise from time to time and are described in Item 1A ―Risk Factors‖ of this report.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed below, or elsewhere in this report or in our
other SEC filings, could have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Risks Related To Our Business
We depend heavily on a limited number of customers, and if we lose any of them or they reduce
their business with us, we would lose a substantial portion of our revenues.
In 2012, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical, collectively accounted
for approximately 52% of our revenues. Our supply agreements with these customers may not be
renewed. Furthermore, many of our supply agreements do not contain minimum purchase level
requirements and therefore there is no guaranteed source of revenue that we can depend upon under these
agreements. The loss of any large customer or a reduction of business with that customer for any reason
would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we do not respond to changes in technology, our products may become obsolete and we may
experience a loss of customers and lower revenues.
We sell our products to customers in several industries that experience rapid technological changes, new
product introductions and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new products
and enhancements, our products and services will likely become technologically obsolete over time and
we may lose a significant number of our customers. In addition, other new products introduced by our
customers may require fewer of our components. We dedicate a significant amount of resources to the
- 22 -
development of our products and technologies and we would be harmed if we did not meet customer
requirements and expectations. Our inability, for technological or other reasons, to successfully develop
and introduce new and innovative products could result in a loss of customers and lower revenues.
If we are unable to successfully market our current or future products, our business will be
harmed and our revenues and operating results will be adversely affected.
The market for our medical and commercial products has been growing in recent years. If the market
for our products does not grow as forecasted by industry experts, our revenues could be less than
expected. In addition, it is difficult to predict the rate at which the market for our products will grow or
at which new and increased competition will result in market saturation. Slower growth in the cardiac
and neuromodulation, orthopaedic, vascular, portable medical or energy markets in particular would
negatively impact our revenues. In addition, we face the risk that our products will lose widespread
market acceptance. Our customers may not continue to utilize the products we offer and a market may
not develop for our future products.
We may at times determine that it is not technically or economically feasible for us to continue to
manufacture certain products and we may not be successful in developing or marketing them.
Additionally, new technologies that we develop may not be rapidly accepted because of
industry-specific factors, including the need for regulatory clearance, entrenched patterns of clinical
practice and uncertainty over third party reimbursement. If this occurs, our business will be harmed and
our operating results will be negatively affected.
We are subject to pricing pressures from customers, which could harm our operating results.
We have made price reductions to some of our large customers in recent years and we expect customer
pressure for price reductions will continue. Price concessions or reductions may cause our operating
results to suffer. In addition, any delay or failure by a large customer to make payments due to us would
harm our operating results and financial condition.
We rely on third party suppliers for raw materials, key products and subcomponents and if we
are unable to obtain these materials, products and subcomponents on a timely basis or on terms
acceptable to us, our ability to manufacture products will suffer.
Our business depends on a continuous supply of raw materials. The principal raw materials used in our
business include lithium, iodine, gold, palladium, stainless steel, aluminum, cobalt chrome, tantalum,
platinum, ruthenium, gallium trichloride, tantalum pellets, vanadium pentoxide, iridium, and titanium.
The supply and price of these raw materials are susceptible to fluctuations due to transportation,
government regulations, price controls, economic climate or other unforeseen circumstances. Increasing
global demand for these raw materials has caused prices of these materials to increase significantly. In
addition, there are a limited number of worldwide suppliers of several raw materials needed to
manufacture our products. We may not be able to continue to procure raw materials critical to our
business or to procure them at acceptable price levels.
In addition, we rely on third party manufacturers to supply many of our products and subcomponents.
Manufacturing problems may occur with these and other outside sources, as a supplier may fail to
develop and supply products and subcomponents to us on a timely basis, or may supply us with products
and subcomponents that do not meet our quality, quantity and cost requirements. If any of these
problems occur, we may be unable to obtain substitute sources for these products and subcomponents on
a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, which could harm our ability to manufacture our own
products and components profitably or on time. In addition, to the extent the processes our suppliers use
- 23 -
to manufacture products and subcomponents are proprietary, we may be unable to obtain comparable
subcomponents from alternative suppliers.
We may never realize the full value of our intangible assets, which represent a significant portion
of our total assets.
At December 28, 2012, we had $457.2 million of intangible assets, representing 51% of our total assets.
These intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill, trademarks, tradenames, customer lists and
patented technology arising from our acquisitions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite
lives are not amortized, but are tested annually or upon the occurrence of certain events which indicate
that the assets may be impaired. Definite lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated
useful lives and are tested for impairment upon the occurrence of certain events which indicate that the
assets may be impaired. We may not receive the recorded value for our intangible assets if we sell or
liquidate our business or assets. In addition, the significant amount of intangible assets increases the risk
of a large charge to earnings in the event that the recoverability of these intangible assets is impaired. In
the event of such a charge to earnings, the market price of our common stock could be affected. In
addition, intangible assets with definite lives, which represent $87.3 million of our net intangible assets
at December 28, 2012, will continue to be amortized. We incurred total amortization expenses relating
to these intangible assets of $14.3 million in 2012. These expenses will reduce our future earnings or
increase our future losses.
Quality problems with our products could harm our reputation for producing high quality
products and erode our competitive advantage.
Our products are held to high quality and performance standards. In the event our products fail to meet
these standards, our reputation could be harmed, which could damage our competitive advantage, cause
us to lose customers and result in lower revenues.
Quality problems with our products could result in warranty claims and additional costs.
We generally allow customers to return defective or damaged products for credit, replacement, or
exchange. We generally warrant that our products will meet customer specifications and will be free
from defects in materials and workmanship. Additionally, we carry a safety stock of inventory for our
customers which may be impacted by warranty claims. We reserve for our exposure to warranty claims
based upon recent historical experience and other specific information as it becomes available. However,
these reserves may not be adequate to cover future warranty claims and additional warranty costs or
inventory write-offs may be incurred which could harm our operating results.
Regulatory issues resulting from product complaints, or recalls, or regulatory audits could harm
our ability to produce and supply products or bring new products to market.
Our products are designed, manufactured and distributed globally in compliance with all applicable
regulations and standards. However, a product complaint, recall or negative regulatory audit may cause
products to be removed from the market and harm our operating results or financial condition. In
addition, during the period in which corrective action is being taken by us to remedy a complaint, recall
or negative audit, regulators may not allow new products to be cleared for marketing and sale.
If we become subject to product liability claims, our operating results and financial condition
could suffer.
The manufacturing and sale of our products expose us to potential product liability claims and product
recalls, including those that arise from failure to meet product specifications, misuse or malfunction, or
design flaws, or use of our products with components or systems not manufactured or sold by us. Many
of our products are components and function in interaction with our customers’ medical devices. For
- 24 -
example, our batteries are produced to meet electrical performance, longevity and other specifications,
but the actual performance of those products is dependent on how they are utilized as part of the
customers’ devices over the lifetime of the products. Product performance and device interaction from
time to time have been, and may in the future be, different than expected for a number of reasons.
Consequently, it is possible that customers may experience problems with their medical devices that
could require device recall or other corrective action, where our batteries met the specification at
delivery, and for reasons that are not related primarily or at all to any failure by our product to perform
in accordance with specifications. It is possible that our customers (or end-users) may in the future
assert that our products caused or contributed to device failure. Even if these assertions do not lead to
product liability or contract claims, they could harm our reputation and our customer relationships.
Provisions contained in our agreements with key customers attempting to limit our damages, including
provisions to limit damages to liability for negligence, may not be enforceable in all instances or may
otherwise fail to protect us from liability for damages. Product liability claims or product recalls,
regardless of their ultimate outcome, could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation
and require us to pay significant damages. The occurrence of product liability claims or product recalls
could affect our operating results and financial condition.
We carry liability insurance coverage that is limited in scope and amount. We may not be able to
maintain this insurance at a reasonable cost or on reasonable terms, or at all. This insurance may not be
adequate to protect us against a product liability claim that arises in the future.
Our operating results may fluctuate, which may make it difficult to forecast our future
performance and may result in volatility in our stock price.
Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate significantly from quarter to
quarter due to a variety of factors, including the following:
a substantial percentage of our costs are fixed in nature, which results in our operations being
particularly sensitive to fluctuations in production volumes;
changes in the relative portion of our revenue represented by our various products and customers,
which could result in reductions in our profits if the relative portion of our revenue represented by
lower margin products increases;
timing of orders placed by our principal customers who account for a significant portion of our
revenues; and
increased costs of raw materials or supplies.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, our business could be
affected.
We rely on a combination of patents, licenses, trade secrets and know-how to establish and protect our
rights to our technologies and products. As of December 28, 2012, we held 541 active U.S. patents and
367 active foreign patents. However, the steps we have taken and will take in the future to protect our
rights may not be adequate to deter misappropriation of our intellectual property. In addition to seeking
formal patent protection whenever possible, we attempt to protect our proprietary rights and trade
secrets by entering into confidentiality and non-compete agreements with employees, consultants and
third parties with which we do business. However, these agreements may be breached and if breached,
there may be no adequate remedy available to us and we may be unable to prevent the unauthorized
disclosure or use of our technical knowledge, practices and/or procedures. If our trade secrets become
known, we may lose our competitive advantages. Additionally, as patents and other intellectual
property protection expire we may lose our competitive advantage.
- 25 -
If third parties infringe or misappropriate our patents or other proprietary rights, our business could be
seriously harmed. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor our intellectual
property rights, or we may not be able to detect infringement of these rights and may lose our
competitive advantages associated with our intellectual property rights before we do so. In addition,
competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies that do not infringe
on our proprietary rights.
We may be subject to intellectual property claims, which could be costly and time consuming and
could divert our management from our business operations.
In producing our products, third parties may claim that we are infringing on their intellectual property
rights, and we may be found to have infringed those intellectual property rights. We may be unaware of
intellectual property rights of others that may be used in our technology and products. In addition, third
parties may claim that our patents have been improperly granted and may seek to invalidate our existing
or future patents. If any claim for invalidation prevailed, third parties may manufacture and sell
products that compete with our products and our revenues from any related license agreements would
decrease accordingly. We also typically do not receive significant indemnification from parties that
license technology to us against third party claims of intellectual property infringement.
Any litigation or other challenges regarding our patents or other intellectual property could be costly and
time consuming and could divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. The
complexity of the technology involved in producing our products, and the uncertainty of intellectual
property litigation increases these risks. Claims of intellectual property infringement may also require
us to enter into costly royalty or license agreements. However, we may not be able to obtain royalty or
license agreements on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We also may be made subject to significant
damages or injunctions against development and sale of our products.
We may not be able to attract, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees to
maintain and grow our business.
Our success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate highly skilled
employees. There is currently aggressive competition for employees who have experience in technology
and engineering. We compete intensely with other companies to recruit and hire from this limited pool.
The industries in which we compete for employees are characterized by high levels of employee
attrition. Although we believe we offer competitive salaries and benefits, we may have to increase
spending in order to attract, train and retain personnel.
We are dependent upon our senior management team and key personnel and the loss of any of
them could significantly harm us.
Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our senior
management team and key technical personnel. Our products are highly technical in nature. In general,
only highly qualified and trained scientists have the necessary skills to develop our products. The loss
or unavailability to us of any member of our senior management team or a key technical employee could
significantly harm us. We face intense competition for these professionals from our competitors,
customers and companies operating in our industry. To the extent that the services of members of our
senior management team and key technical personnel would be unavailable to us for any reason, we
would be required to hire other personnel to manage and operate our Company and to develop our
products and technology. We may not be able to locate or employ such qualified personnel on
acceptable terms.
- 26 -
We may not realize the expected benefits from our cost savings and consolidation initiatives or
those initiatives may have unintended consequences, which may harm our business or results of
operations.
We have incurred significant charges related to various cost savings and consolidation efforts. These
initiatives were undertaken to improve our operational effectiveness, efficiencies and profitability.
Additional information regarding these initiatives is discussed in the ―Cost Savings and Consolidation
Efforts‖ section of Item 7 to this report. Cost reduction efforts under these initiatives include various
cost and efficiency improvement measures such as, headcount reductions, the relocation of certain
resources as well as administrative and functional activities, the closure of certain facilities, the transfer
of certain production lines, the sale of certain non-strategic assets and other efforts to streamline our
business, among other actions. These measures could yield unintended consequences, such as distraction
of our management and employees, business disruption, disputes with customers, attrition beyond our
planned reduction in workforce and reduced employee productivity. If any of these unintended
consequences were to occur, they could negatively affect our business, sales, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, headcount reductions and customer disputes may subject us to the risk
of litigation, which could result in substantial cost. Moreover, our expense reduction programs result in
charges and expenses that impact our operating results. We cannot guarantee that these measures, or
other expense reduction measures we take in the future, will result in the expected cost savings.
We may make acquisitions that could subject us to a number of operational risks and we may not
be successful in integrating companies we acquire into our existing operations.
We have made and expect to make in the future acquisitions that complement our core competencies in
technology and manufacturing to enable us to manufacture and sell additional products to our existing
customers and to expand our business into related markets. Implementation of our acquisition strategy
entails a number of risks, including:
inaccurate assessments of potential liabilities associated with the acquired businesses;
the existence of unknown or undisclosed liabilities associated with the acquired businesses;
diversion of our management’s attention from our core businesses;
potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired businesses;
difficulties in integrating the operations and products of an acquired business or in realizing projected
revenue growth, efficiencies and cost savings; and
increases in indebtedness and limitation in our ability to access capital if needed.
Our acquisitions have increased the size and scope of our operations, and may place a strain on our
managerial, operational and financial resources and systems. Any failure by us to manage this growth and
successfully integrate these acquisitions could harm our business and our financial condition and results.
If we are not successful in making acquisitions to expand and develop our business, our operating
results may suffer.
One facet of our growth strategy is to make acquisitions that complement our core competencies in
technology and manufacturing to enable us to manufacture and sell additional products to our existing
customers and to expand our business into related markets. Our continued growth may depend on our
ability to identify and acquire companies that complement or enhance our business on acceptable terms.
We may not be able to identify or complete future acquisitions. Some of the risks that we may encounter
include expenses associated with and difficulties in identifying potential targets, the costs associated
with unsuccessful acquisitions, and higher prices for acquired companies because of competition for
attractive acquisition targets.
- 27 -
Accidents at any of our facilities could delay production and affect our operations.
Our business involves complex manufacturing processes and hazardous materials that can be dangerous to
our employees. Although we employ safety procedures in the design and operation of our facilities, there
is a risk that an accident or death could occur. Any accident, such as a chemical spill or fire, could result
in significant manufacturing delays or claims for damages resulting from injuries, which would harm our
operations and financial condition. The potential liability resulting from any such accident or death, to the
extent not covered by insurance, could harm our financial condition or operating results. Any disruption
of operations at any of our facilities, and in particular our larger facilities, could harm our business.
We may face competition that could harm our business and we may be unable to compete
successfully against new entrants and established companies with greater resources.
Competition in connection with the manufacturing of our medical products may intensify in the future.
One or more of our medical customers may undertake additional vertical integration initiatives and begin
to manufacture some or all of their components that we currently supply them which could cause our
operating results to suffer. The market for commercial power sources is competitive, fragmented and
subject to rapid technological change. Many other commercial power source suppliers are larger and have
greater financial, operational, personnel, sales, technical and marketing resources than us. These and other
companies may develop products that are superior to ours, which could result in lower revenues and
operating results.
We intend to develop new products and expand into new markets, which may not be successful
and could harm our operating results.
We intend to expand into new markets and develop new and modified products based on our existing
technologies and engineering capabilities, including the development of complete medical devices.
These efforts have required and will continue to require us to make substantial investments, including
significant research, development and engineering expenditures and capital expenditures for new,
expanded or improved manufacturing facilities. Additionally, many of the new products we are working
on take longer and more resources to develop and commercialize, including obtaining regulatory
approval.
Specific risks in connection with expanding into new products and markets include: longer product
development cycles, the inability to transfer our quality standards and technology into new products, the
failure to receive or delay in receipt of regulatory approval for new products or modifications to existing
products, and the failure of our customers to accept the new or modified products.
Our failure to obtain licenses from third parties for new technologies or the loss of these licenses could
impair our ability to design and manufacture new products and reduce our revenues.
We occasionally license technologies from third parties rather than depending exclusively on our own
proprietary technology and developments. Our ability to license new technologies from third parties is
and will continue to be critical to our ability to offer new and improved products. We may not be able to
continue to identify new technologies developed by others and even if we are able to identify new
technologies, we may not be able to negotiate licenses on favorable terms, or at all. Additionally, we
could lose rights granted under licenses for reasons beyond our control.
Our international sales and operations are subject to a variety of market and financial risks and
costs that could affect our profitability and operating results.
Our sales outside the U.S., which accounted for 49% of sales for 2012, and our operations in Mexico,
Switzerland and France, are and will continue to be subject to a number of risks and potential costs,
including:
- 28 -
changes in foreign economic conditions and/or regulatory requirements;
local product preferences and product requirements;
longer-term receivables than are typical in the U.S.;
difficulties in enforcing agreements through foreign legal systems;
less protection of intellectual property in some countries outside of the U.S.;
trade protection measures and import and export licensing requirements;
work force instability;
political and economic instability; and
complex tax and cash management issues.
We earn revenue and incur expenses related to our foreign sales and operations that are denominated in
a foreign currency. Historically, foreign currency fluctuations have not had a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements. However, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could have
a significant negative impact on our profitability and operating results.
The current economic environment and credit market uncertainty could interrupt our access to
capital markets, borrowings, or financial transactions to hedge certain risks, which could
adversely affect our financial condition.
To date, we have been able to access debt and equity financing that has allowed us to make investments
in growth opportunities and fund working capital requirements. In addition, we enter into financial
transactions to hedge certain risks, including foreign exchange and interest rate risk. Our continued
access to capital markets, the stability of our lenders and their willingness to support our needs, and the
stability of the parties to our financial transactions that hedge risks are essential for us to meet our
current and long-term obligations, fund operations, and fund our strategic initiatives. An interruption in
our access to external financing or financial transactions to hedge risk could affect our business
prospects and financial condition.
Current domestic and international economic conditions could adversely affect our results of
operations.
The global economic slowdown, including the European sovereign debt crisis, has caused extreme
disruption in the financial markets, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability. Our
customers may experience financial difficulties or be unable to borrow money to fund their operations,
which may adversely impact their ability or decision to purchase our products, or to pay for our products
they do purchase on a timely basis, if at all. The strength and timing of any economic recovery remains
uncertain, and we cannot predict to what extent the global economic slowdown and European sovereign
debt crisis may negatively impact our selling prices, our net sales and our profit margins. In addition,
current economic conditions may adversely affect our suppliers, leading them to experience financial
difficulties or to be unable to borrow money to fund their operations, which could cause disruptions in
our ability to produce our products.
The failure of our information technology systems to perform as anticipated could disrupt our
business and affect our financial condition.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our information technology (―IT‖) systems.
Accordingly, we rely upon the capacity, reliability and security of our IT hardware and software
infrastructure and our ability to expand and update this infrastructure in response to our changing needs.
Despite our implementation of security measures, our systems are vulnerable to damages from computer
viruses, natural disasters, incursions by intruders or hackers, failures in hardware or software, power
fluctuations, cyber terrorists and other similar disruptions. The failure of our IT systems to perform as
- 29 -
anticipated for any reason or any significant breach of security could disrupt our business and result in
numerous consequences, including reduced effectiveness and efficiency of operations, inappropriate
disclosure of confidential information, increased overhead costs and loss of important information,
which could have a material effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, we may be
required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security
breaches in the future.
Risks Related To Our Industries
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and subject to various political, economic and
regulatory changes that could increase our compliance costs and force us to modify how we
develop and price our products.
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is influenced by changing political, economic and
regulatory factors. Several of our product lines are subject to international, federal, state and local
health and safety, packaging and product content regulations. In addition, medical devices produced by
our customers are subject to regulation by the FDA and similar governmental agencies. These
regulations cover a wide variety of product activities from design and development to labeling,
manufacturing, promotion, sales and distribution. Compliance with these regulations may be time
consuming, burdensome and expensive and could negatively affect our customers’ abilities to sell their
products, which in turn would affect our ability to sell our products. This may result in higher than
anticipated costs or lower than anticipated revenues.
Furthermore, healthcare industry regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become
more stringent over time. Federal and state legislatures have periodically considered programs to reform
or amend the U.S. healthcare system at both the federal and state levels. In addition, these regulations
may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in healthcare, lower reimbursement rates or
otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate. We may be required
to incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations or remedy past violations of these
regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable government regulations could also result in cessation
of portions or all of our operations, impositions of fines and restrictions on our ability to carry on or
expand our operations. In addition, because many of our products are sold into regulated industries, we
must comply with additional regulations in marketing our products.
In response to perceived increases in health care costs in recent years, there have been and continue to be
proposals by the Obama administration, members of Congress, state governments, regulators and third-
party payors to control these costs and, more generally, to reform the U.S. healthcare system. Health Care
Reform imposes significant new taxes on medical device manufacturers, which will result in a significant
increase in the tax burden on our industry and which could have a material negative impact on our financial
condition, results of operations and our cash flows. Other elements of Health Care Reform such as
comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board, payment system reforms
including shared savings pilots and other provisions could meaningfully change the way healthcare is
developed and delivered, and may materially impact numerous aspects of our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the new medical
device tax will have on our results from operations beginning in 2013, and has preliminarily estimated that
it will reduce gross profit by $1.5 million to $2.5 million.
Many significant parts of Health Care Reform will be phased in over time and require further guidance
and clarification in the form of regulations. As a result, many of the impacts of Health Care Reform will
not be known until those regulations are enacted, which we expect to occur over the next several years.
- 30 -
Our business is subject to environmental regulations that could be costly to comply with.
Federal, state and local regulations impose various environmental controls on the manufacturing,
transportation, storage, use and disposal of batteries and hazardous chemicals and other materials used in,
and hazardous waste produced by, the manufacturing of our products. Conditions relating to our historical
operations may require expenditures for clean-up in the future and changes in environmental laws and
regulations may impose costly compliance requirements on us or otherwise subject us to future liabilities.
Additional or modified regulations relating to the manufacture, transportation, storage, use and disposal of
materials used to manufacture our products or restricting disposal or transportation of batteries may be
imposed that may result in higher costs or lower operating results. In addition, we cannot predict the effect
that additional or modified environmental regulations may have on us or our customers.
Consolidation in the healthcare industry could result in greater competition and reduce our
revenues and harm our business.
Many healthcare industry companies are consolidating to create new companies with greater market
power. As the healthcare industry consolidates, competition to provide products and services to industry
participants will become more intense. These industry participants may try to use their market power to
negotiate price concessions or reductions for our products. If we are forced to reduce our prices, our
revenues would decrease and our operating results would suffer.
Our business is indirectly subject to healthcare industry cost containment measures that could
result in reduced sales of our products.
Several of our customers rely on third party payors, such as government programs and private health
insurance plans, to reimburse some or all of the cost of the procedures in which our products are used.
The continuing efforts of government, insurance companies and other payors of healthcare costs to
contain or reduce those costs could lead to patients being unable to obtain approval for payment from
these third party payors. If that occurred, sales of medical devices may decline significantly and our
customers may reduce or eliminate purchases of our products. The cost containment measures that
healthcare payors are instituting, both in the U.S. and internationally, could reduce our revenues and
harm our operating results.
Our Electrochem revenues are dependent on conditions in the oil and natural gas industry, which
historically have been volatile.
Sales of our Electrochem products depend upon the condition of the oil and gas industry. In the past, oil
and natural gas prices have been volatile and the oil and gas exploration and production industry has been
cyclical, and it is likely that oil and natural gas prices will continue to fluctuate in the future. The current
and anticipated prices of oil and natural gas influence the oil and gas exploration and production business
and are affected by a variety of political and economic factors, including worldwide demand for oil and
natural gas, worldwide and domestic supplies of oil and natural gas, the ability of the Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries (―OPEC‖) to set and maintain production levels and pricing, the level of
production of non-OPEC countries, the price and availability of alternative fuels, political stability in oil
producing regions and the policies of the various governments regarding exploration and development of
their oil and natural gas reserves. A change in the oil and gas exploration and production industry or a
reduction in the exploration and production expenditures of oil and gas companies could cause our
Electrochem revenues to decline.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
- 31 -
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth information about our principal facilities as of December 28, 2012:
Location
Sq. Ft. Own/Lease Principal Use
Alden, NY ........................... 125,000
Ann Arbor, MI .................... 9,970
Beaverton, OR .................... 62,200
Blaine, MN ......................... 32,400
Chaumont, France ............... 59,200
Clarence, NY ...................... 117,800
Clarence, NY ...................... 20,800
Clarence, NY ...................... 18,600
Cleveland, OH .................... 16,900
Corgemont, Switzerland ..... 34,400
Fort Wayne, IN ................... 81,000
Frisco, TX ........................... 9,241
Indianapolis, IN .................. 82,600
Minneapolis, MN ................ 72,000
Orvin, Switzerland .............. 40,400
Plymouth, MN .................... 122,821
Raynham, MA ..................... 81,000
Tijuana, Mexico .................. 190,800
Own
Lease
Lease
Own
Own
Own
Own
Lease
Lease
Lease
Own
Lease
Own
Own
Own
Lease
Own
Lease
Warsaw, IN ......................... 3,000
Lease
Medical battery and capacitor manufacturing
Office and lab space for design engineering team
Commercial battery manufacturing
Medical device engineering
Manufacturing of orthopaedic implants
Corporate offices and RD&E
Machining and assembly of components
Machining and assembly of components
Office and lab space for design engineering team
Manufacturing of orthopaedic instruments
Manufacturing of orthopaedic instruments
Global headquarters – principal executive office
Manufacturing of orthopaedic cases and trays
Enclosure manufacturing and engineering
Manufacturing of orthopaedic instruments
Introducers, catheters and leads manufacturing
Commercial battery manufacturing and RD&E
Feedthrough, catheters and orthopaedic instrument
manufacturing and value-added assembly
Orthopaedic rapid prototyping design center
In 2012, the Company completed construction of an orthopaedic manufacturing facility in Fort Wayne,
IN and transferred manufacturing operations being performed at its Columbia City, IN location into this
new facility. During 2012, the Company also transferred most major functions performed at its facilities
in Orvin and Corgemont, Switzerland into its Fort Wayne, IN and Tijuana, Mexico facilities.
Additionally, during 2012, the Company relocated its global headquarters to Frisco, TX. In the first
quarter of 2013, the Company’s Corgemont, Switzerland facility lease was assumed by a third party in
connection with its purchase of certain non-core orthopaedic product lines.
Near the end of 2011, the Company initiated plans to upgrade and expand its manufacturing
infrastructure in order to support its medical device strategy. This includes the transfer of certain
product lines to create additional capacity for the manufacture of medical devices, expansion of its
Plymouth, MN and Tijuana, Mexico facilities, as well as the purchase of equipment to enable the
production of medical devices. These initiatives are expected to be completed over the next year. Total
capital investment under these initiatives is expected to be between $15 million and $20 million of
which approximately $9.9 million has been expended to date.
- 32 -
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On December 21, 2012, our Electrochem subsidiary and several other unaffiliated parties were named as
defendants in a personal injury and wrongful death action filed in the 113th Judicial District Court of
Harris County, Texas. The complaint seeks damages alleging marketing defects and failure to warn,
negligence and gross negligence relating to a product Electrochem manufactured and sold to a customer,
one of the other named defendants, which, in turn, incorporated the Electrochem product into its own
product which it sold to its customer, another named defendant. The cost of defense in this matter is the
responsibility of Electrochem’s customer. Electrochem also has product liability insurance coverage.
Electrochem has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend the matter.
We are party to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. A description of pending
legal actions against the Company is set forth at Note 15 ―Commitments and Contingencies‖ of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report. We do not believe that
the ultimate resolution of any pending legal actions will have a material effect on our consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows. However, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties and there can be no assurance that any pending legal action, which we currently believe to
be immaterial, does not become material in the future.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
The Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (―NYSE‖) under the symbol
―GB.‖ The following table sets forth information on the prices of our common stock as reported by the
NYSE:
2011
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
2012
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
High
$26.92
29.06
28.33
23.10
$27.22
24.82
25.64
25.33
Low
$22.91
25.20
18.55
18.78
$21.35
20.29
22.05
21.08
Close
$26.12
27.23
20.01
22.10
$24.52
22.71
24.33
22.89
As of February 27, 2013, there were approximately 130 record holders of the Company’s common
stock. The Company stock account included in our 401(k) plan is considered one record holder for the
purposes of this calculation. There is approximately 1,900 active and former employees’ holding
Company stock in the 401(k) plan. We have not paid cash dividends and currently intend to retain any
earnings to further develop and grow our business.
- 33 -
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares, for the five year period ended December 28, 2012, the cumulative total
stockholder return for Greatbatch, Inc., the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, and the Hemscott Peer Group
Index. The Hemscott Peer Group Index includes approximately 110 comparable companies included in
the Hemscott Industry Group 520 Medical Instruments & Supplies and 521 Medical Appliances &
Equipment. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 28, 2007 and assumes
reinvestment of dividends. The stock price performance shown on the following graph is not necessarily
indicative of future price performance:
- 34 -
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table provides selected financial data for the periods indicated. You should read this data
along with Item 7, ―Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,‖ and Item 8, ―Financial Statements and Supplementary Data‖ appearing elsewhere in this
report. The consolidated statement of operations data and the consolidated balance sheet data for the
fiscal years indicated have been derived from our consolidated financial statements and related notes (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
Statement of Operations Data:
Sales
Dec. 28,
2012 (1)(2)
Dec. 30,
2011 (1)(2)
Years Ended
Dec. 31,
2010 (2)(3)
Jan. 1,
2010 (2)(3)
Jan. 2,
2009 (2)(4)
$ 646,177 $ 568,822 $ 533,425 $ 521,821 $ 546,644
Net income (loss)
(4,799)
33,122
33,138
(9,001)
14,148
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic
Diluted
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital
$
(0.20) $
(0.20)
1.42 $
1.40
1.44 $
1.40
(0.39) $
(0.39)
0.63
0.62
$ 176,376 $ 170,907 $ 150,922 $ 119,926 $ 142,219
Total assets
889,875
881,347
776,976
830,543
848,033
Long-term obligations
317,258
320,015
289,560
317,575
379,890
(1) On February 16, 2012, and on December 15, 2011, we acquired NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc., and
Micro Power Electronics, Inc., respectively. This data includes the results of operations of these
companies subsequent to their acquisition. Additional information is set forth in Note 2
―Acquisitions‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
In 2011, the Company sold its cost method investment in IntElect Medical, Inc. This transaction
resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.5 million.
(2) From 2008 to 2012, we recorded material charges in Other Operating Expenses, Net, primarily
(3)
related to our cost savings and consolidation initiatives. Additional information is set forth in Note
13 ―Other Operating Expenses, Net‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this report.
In 2009, we recorded a $34.5 million charge related to litigation involving Electrochem and a $15.9
million write-down of trademarks and tradenames. In 2010, we settled the Electrochem litigation
which resulted in a $9.5 million gain. Additional information is set forth in Note 15 ―Commitments
and Contingencies‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this
report.
(4) During 2008, we acquired P Medical Holding, SA (January 2008) and DePuy Orthopaedics’
Chaumont, France facility (February 2008). This data includes the results of operations of these
companies subsequent to their acquisition. In connection with these acquisitions, we recorded
charges in 2008 of $8.7 million related to inventory step-up amortization and the write-off of in-
process research and development.
- 35 -
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OUR FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT.
Our Business
Our business
Our acquisitions
Our customers
Strategic and financial overview
2013 financial guidance
Cost savings and consolidation efforts
Product development
Government regulation
Our Critical Accounting Estimates
Valuation of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets
Stock-based compensation
Tangible long-lived assets
Provision for income taxes
Inventories
Our Financial Results
Results of operations table
Fiscal 2012 compared with fiscal 2011
Fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010
Liquidity and capital resources
Off-balance sheet arrangements
Litigation
Contractual obligations
Inflation
Impact of recently issued accounting standards
Our Business
We operate our business in two reportable segments – Implantable Medical and Electrochem Solutions
(―Electrochem‖). The Company’s customers include large multi-national original equipment
manufacturers (―OEMs‖). The Implantable Medical segment is comprised of our Greatbatch Medical
and QiG Group brands and designs and manufactures medical devices and components for the cardiac,
neuromodulation, vascular and orthopaedic markets. The Implantable Medical segment offers complete
medical devices including design, development, manufacturing, regulatory submission and supporting
worldwide distribution, which is facilitated through the QiG Group and leverages the component
technology of Greatbatch Medical. The devices designed and developed by the QiG Group are
manufactured by Greatbatch Medical. The Implantable Medical segment also offers value-added
assembly and design engineering services for its component products.
- 36 -
Electrochem provides industry-leading total power solutions for rechargeable and non-rechargeable
battery power systems, charging and docking stations, and power supplies, for critical applications in the
portable medical and energy markets, where safety, reliability, quality and innovation are critical.
Electrochem’s product lines cover a number of highly-customized battery-powered applications in
remote and demanding environments, including down hole drilling tools and in life-saving and life-
enhancing applications, including automated external defibrillators, portable oxygen concentrators,
ventilators and powered surgical tools, among others.
Our Acquisitions
On December 15, 2011, Electrochem acquired all of the outstanding stock of Micro Power Electronics,
Inc. (―Micro Power‖) headquartered in Beaverton, OR. Micro Power is a leading supplier of custom
battery solutions, serving the portable medical, military and handheld automatic identification and data
collection markets. Micro Power’s commercial portfolio is highly complementary to the products and
services offered by Electrochem. The results of Micro Power were included in our Electrochem segment
from the date of acquisition. The aggregate purchase price of Micro Power was $71.8 million, which we
funded with cash on hand and $45 million borrowed under our revolving credit facility. Total assets
acquired from Micro Power were $88.2 million. Total liabilities assumed from Micro Power were $16.4
million. For 2012, Micro Power added approximately $82.4 million to our revenue.
On February 16, 2012, Greatbatch purchased all of the outstanding common stock of NeuroNexus
Technologies, Inc. (―NeuroNexus‖) headquartered in Ann Arbor, MI. NeuroNexus is an active
implantable medical device design firm specializing in developing and commercializing neural interface
technology, components and systems for neuroscience and clinical markets. NeuroNexus has an
extensive intellectual property portfolio, core technologies and capabilities to support the development
and manufacturing of innovative neural interface devices across a wide range of functions including
neuromodulation, sensing, optical stimulation and targeted drug delivery applications. The results of
NeuroNexus were included in our Implantable Medical segment from the date of acquisition. The
aggregate purchase price of NeuroNexus was $13.2 million, which we funded with cash on hand and
$10 million borrowed under our revolving credit facility. Total assets acquired from NeuroNexus were
$14.6 million. Total liabilities assumed from NeuroNexus were $1.4 million. For 2012, NeuroNexus
added approximately $2.5 million to our revenue.
Going forward, we will continue to pursue potential acquisitions.
Our Customers
Our products are designed to provide reliable, long-lasting solutions that meet the evolving requirements
and needs of our customers and the end users of their products. The nature and extent of our selling
relationships with each customer are different in terms of breadth of products purchased, purchased
product volumes, length of contractual commitment, ordering patterns, inventory management and
selling prices.
Our Implantable Medical customers include large multi-national OEMs, such as Biotronik, Boston
Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Smith & Nephew, Sorin Group, St. Jude Medical, Stryker
and Zimmer. During 2012, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical
collectively accounted for 52% of our total sales.
Our Electrochem customers are primarily companies involved in demanding markets where highly
sophisticated power solutions needs exist, such as energy, portable medical, military and environmental.
- 37 -
Some of our larger OEM customers include General Electric, Halliburton Company, Scripps Institution
of Oceanography, Thales, Weatherford International and Zoll Medical Corp.
Strategic and Financial Overview
Since 2007, we have been implementing a strategy centered on continually strengthening three aspects of
our business that can most affect profitable growth: our top line, our bottom line and our pipeline. This
strategy includes three facets; growth in our core business, growth through acquisitions and growth
through the development and commercialization of complete medical devices. As a result of this
strategy, sales increased 14% for 2012 and 7% for 2011. Sales growth for 2012 and 2011 included the
benefit from our acquisitions of $84.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Additionally, sales include
the impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which decreased 2012 sales by $6 million
in comparison to 2011 and increased 2011 sales by $8 million in comparison to 2010. On a constant
currency, organic basis sales were consistent from 2011 to 2012 and increased 5% from 2010 to 2011 as
growth from our vascular and portable medical product lines more than offset the impact the declining
cardiac rhythm management (―CRM‖) market had on our cardiac and neuromodulation product line. Our
portable medical product line is benefiting from new product introductions and market shift in patient
care from clinical settings to the home, and an aging population, which is driving the need for
lightweight and portable devices for patients and caregivers. Our vascular product line growth is being
driven by growth in the underlying market, market share gains and the commercialization of our medical
devices. Despite the declining CRM market, we were able to grow our cardiac business faster than the
underlying market through innovation as well as deepening customer relationships. For 2013, we expect
revenue, after adjusting for the sale of a portion of our orthopaedic product line, to organically grow 5-
8% driven primarily by our portable medical, vascular and orthopaedic product lines along with above
market growth in cardiac and neuromodulation.
Simultaneous with the initiation of our growth strategy, we began evolving our product offerings to
include the development of complete medical devices in order to raise the growth and profitability
profile of the Company. This medical device strategy is being facilitated through our QiG Group and
leverages the component technology of Greatbatch Medical. More specifically, this strategy includes the
development of a neuromodulation platform that can be used to support several devices most notably of
which is our spinal cord stimulator for the treatment of chronic pain in the trunk and limbs, which we call
Algostim. We currently expect to submit this device to regulatory authorities in the second half of 2013.
Incremental investments in all of our medical device products, including Algostim, totaled $33.9 million,
$27.3 million and $21.9 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and included charges to selling,
general and administrative expenses (―SG&A‖) and research, development and engineering, net
(―RD&E‖). As a result of this strategy, as well as our acquisitions, SG&A increased 12% during both
2012 and 2011 while RD&E increased 15% and 1%, respectively, for the same periods.
During the second half of 2012, we began a process to more fully optimize our research and development
efforts. This included the reallocation of research and development resources to higher priority projects,
the postponement of some research and development projects, and the decision to pursue various
alternatives to monetize our existing non-core intellectual property and entering into more co-
development arrangements with our customers. As a result, RD&E for the second half of 2012 was $3.7
million lower than the first half of 2012. These reductions are also expected to benefit 2013.
We have a longstanding history of operational excellence, which is one of our core competencies. As we
move forward, investing in our operations will continue to be critical to the success of our growth and
medical device strategies. Since 2007, we have invested substantial resources in integrating our
acquisitions and streamlining our operations. This strategy continued during 2012 as we worked
- 38 -
diligently to resolve the operational issues we were experiencing at our Swiss orthopaedic facilities,
expanded our manufacturing infrastructure to support the commercialization of our medical devices and
upgraded our global ERP system in order to support our future growth. As a result of these initiatives,
our other operating expense totaled $47.5 million over the last three years, $42.3 million of which was
incurred during 2012. These expenses are expected to be reduced significantly in 2013 and to range
from $6.7 million to $8.2 million, which will improve the overall earnings of Greatbatch. While we
continually identify and implement cost improvement initiatives, we have now completed all of our
major plant consolidations, which began in 2007, so our leadership team can focus on achieving
sustainable organic growth to leverage our available capacity.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America (―GAAP‖). Additionally, we consistently report and discuss
in our quarterly earnings releases and investor presentations adjusted operating income and margin,
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share, which are non-GAAP measures. These
adjusted amounts consist of GAAP amounts and, to the extent occurring during a period, excludes (i)
acquisition-related charges, (ii) facility consolidation, optimization, manufacturing transfer and system
integration charges, (iii) asset write-down and disposition charges, (iv) severance charges in connection
with corporate realignments or a reduction in force (v) litigation charges and gains, (vi) the impact of
non-cash charges to interest expense due to the accounting change governing convertible debt, (vii)
unusual or infrequently occurring items, (viii) certain RD&E expenditures, such as design verification
testing (―DVT‖) expenses incurred in connection with the development of our neuromodulation
platform, (ix) gain/loss on the sale of investments, (x) the income tax (benefit) related to these
adjustments and (xi) certain tax charges related to the consolidation of our Swiss Orthopaedic facility.
We believe that reporting these amounts provides important supplemental information to our investors
and creditors seeking to understand the financial and business trends relating to our financial condition
and results of operations. Additionally, the performance based compensation of our executive
management is determined utilizing these adjusted amounts.
A reconciliation of GAAP operating income (loss) to adjusted amounts is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Total sales
$ 483,165 $ 489,065 $ 163,012 $ 79,757 $
- $
- $ 646,177 $ 568,822
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
Implantable Medical
Dec. 28, Dec. 30, Dec. 28, Dec. 30, Dec. 28, Dec. 30, Dec. 28, Dec. 30,
Electrochem
Unallocated
Total
Operating income (loss) as reported
Adjustments:
Inventory step-up amortization (COS)
Medical device DVT expenses (RD&E)
Consolidation and optimization costs
Integration expenses
Asset dispositions, severance and other
Adjusted operating income (loss)
$ 24,908 $ 62,461 $ 21,631 $ 14,965 $ (20,718) $ (15,727) $ 25,821 $ 61,699
-
5,190
34,378
167
247
177
5,133
425
-
168
$ 64,890 $ 68,070 $ 24,333 $ 15,259 $ (15,334) $ (15,727) $ 73,889 $ 67,602
532
5,190
39,048
1,460
1,838
532
-
-
1,287
883
-
-
4,670
6
708
-
5,133
425
-
51
177
-
-
-
117
-
-
-
-
-
Adjusted operating margin
13.4%
13.9%
14.9%
19.1%
N/A
N/A
11.4%
11.9%
Medical device related adjusted
expenses (excluding DVT)
Adjusted operating income excluding
medical device initiatives
Adjusted operating margin excluding
medical device initiatives
$ 28,453 $ 22,080 $
- $
- $
- $
- $ 28,453 $ 22,080
$ 93,343 $ 90,150 $ 24,333 $ 15,259 $ (15,334) $ (15,727) $ 102,342 $ 89,682
19.3%
18.4%
14.9%
19.1% N/A
N/A
15.8% 15.8%
- 39 -
Total sales
2011
2010
2011
2010
$ 489,065 $ 460,269 $ 79,757 $ 73,156 $
2011
-
2010
-
$
2011
2010
$ 568,822 $ 533,425
Implantable Medical
Dec. 30, Dec. 31, Dec. 30, Dec. 31, Dec. 30, Dec. 31, Dec. 30, Dec. 31,
Electrochem
Unallocated
Total
Operating income (loss) as reported
Adjustments:
Inventory step-up amortization (COS)
Executive death benefits (SG&A)
Medical device DVT expenses (RD&E)
Electrochem litigation gain
Consolidation and optimization costs
Integration expenses
Asset dispositions, severance and other
Adjusted operating income (loss)
Adjusted operating margin
$ 62,461 $ 62,477 $ 14,965 $ 22,195 $ (15,727) $ (15,678) $ 61,699 $ 68,994
-
885
-
-
573
(4)
2,517
-
-
5,133
-
425
-
51
-
885
-
(9,500)
1,573
42
2,943
$ 68,070 $ 66,448 $ 15,259 $ 13,795 $ (15,727) $ (15,306) $ 67,602 $ 64,937
12.2%
18.9% N/A
-
-
-
(9,500)
1,000
-
100
177
-
5,133
-
425
-
168
177
-
-
-
-
-
117
-
-
-
-
-
46
326
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13.9%
N/A
11.9%
14.4%
19.1%
Medical device related adjusted expenses
(excluding DVT)
Adjusted operating income excluding
medical device initiatives
Adjusted operating margin excluding
medical device initiatives
$ 22,080 $ 21,878 $
- $
- $
- $
- $ 22,080 $ 21,878
$ 90,150 $ 88,326 $ 15,259 $ 13,795 $ (15,727) $ (15,306) $ 89,682 $ 86,815
18.4%
19.2%
19.1%
18.9% N/A
N/A
15.8%
16.3%
GAAP operating income for 2012 was $25.8 million compared to $61.7 million for 2011 and $69.0
million for 2010. These decreases were primarily due to the costs incurred in connection with our
medical device and consolidation and productivity initiatives discussed above, as well as the litigation
settlement gain recorded in 2010. Adjusted operating income, which excludes these items, was $73.9
million for 2012, compared to $67.6 million for 2011 and $64.9 million for 2010. This represents an
increase of 9% for 2012 and 4% for 2011 as the Company continues to leverage its operating
infrastructure and is beginning to see the benefits of its productivity and consolidation initiatives.
Beginning in 2012, we are showing adjusted operating income excluding the incremental costs from our
medical device initiatives. This information is provided in order to enhance the reader’s understanding
of our core business, which is being impacted by these medical device investments and has not
meaningfully impacted our revenue or gross margins. Sales of complete medical devices developed
under the Greatbatch name were $6.6 million during 2012 compared to $4.5 million for 2011, an
increase of 47%.
- 40 -
A reconciliation of GAAP net income (loss) and diluted earnings (loss) per share ("EPS") to adjusted
amounts is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
Net income (loss) as reported
Adjustments:(a)
Inventory step-up amortization (COS)
Executive death benefits (SG&A)
Medical device DVT expenses (RD&E)
Electrochem litigation gain
Consolidation and optimization costs
Integration expenses
Asset dispositions, severance and other
(Gain) loss on cost and equity method
investments, net(b )
CSN conversion option discount
amortization(c )
Swiss tax impact(d)
Adjusted net income and diluted EPS(e)
Adjusted diluted weighted average shares (f)
Net
Income
(Loss)
(4,799) $
$
Impact
Per
Diluted
Share
Net
Income
(Loss)
Impact
Per
Diluted
Share
Net
Income
(Loss)
Impact
Per
Diluted
Share
(0.20) $ 33,122 $
1.40 $ 33,138 $
1.40
346
-
3,374
-
28,934
949
1,186
0.01
-
0.14
-
1.21
0.04
0.05
115
-
3,336
-
276
-
109
-
-
0.14
-
575
-
- (6,175)
1,022
27
1,913
0.01
-
-
-
0.02
-
(0.26)
0.04
-
0.08
69
- (2,751)
(0.12)
98
-
6,234
6,190
$ 42,483 $
23,947
0.26
0.26
5,515
-
0.23
-
5,119
-
1.77 $ 39,722 $
1.68 $ 35,718 $
0.22
-
1.51
23,636
23,802
(a) Net of tax amounts computed using the applicable U.S. and foreign statutory tax rates of 35% and
22.5%, respectively, for items incurred in those geographic locations.
(b) Pre-tax amount is a loss of $106 thousand, gain of $4.2 million and loss of $150 thousand for 2012,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
(c) Pre-tax amount is $9.6 million, $8.5 million and $7.9 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(d) Relates to the loss of our Swiss tax holiday due to our decision to transfer manufacturing out of
Switzerland, as well as the establishment of a valuation allowance on our Swiss deferred tax assets
as it is more likely than not that they will not be fully realized.
(e) The per share data in this table has been rounded to the nearest $0.01 and therefore may not sum to
the total.
(f) Adjusted diluted weighted average shares for 2012 include 363 thousand shares of dilution related to
outstanding stock incentive awards that were not dilutive for GAAP diluted EPS purposes.
GAAP net income (loss) and diluted EPS include the impact of costs incurred in connection with our
medical device and consolidation and productivity initiatives, as well as the litigation settlement gain
recorded in 2010. Excluding these items, adjusted diluted EPS increased 5% in 2012 and 11% in 2011.
In aggregate we estimate that our Swiss operational issues had a negative $0.16 per share of adjusted
diluted earnings impact for 2012.
For 2013, we expect our performance to improve as we progress through the year, as the first quarter of
2013 will be impacted by the startup of our recently transferred orthopaedic production lines. The
- 41 -
second half of the year is expected to improve as the orthopaedic backlog is relieved and new product
introductions in our portable medical business commercialize. As a result of our consolidation initiatives
and refocused medical device RD&E investment, we expect improved performance each quarter when
compared to the prior year and expect to achieve adjusted diluted EPS growth of 7-13% for 2013.
2013 Financial Guidance
For 2013, we estimate annual revenue growth rates for our product lines as follows:
Product Line
Estimated 2013 Annual
Growth Rate (%)
Cardiac & Neuromodulation
Vascular
Orthopaedic(1)
Portable Medical
Energy & Other
Total Sales(1)
0% - 2%
7% - 13%
(5%) - 0%
15% - 20%
6%
2% - 5%
2013 Estimated Revenue
(millions)
$309 - $315
$55 - $59
$116 - $122
$94 - $98
$86 - $86
$660 - $680
(1) Organic revenue growth for orthopaedic product line is 8% - 14% due to disposition of
approximately $15 million of non-core product lines at the end of 2012. Total consolidated organic
revenue growth is expected to be 5% - 8%.
Adjusted Operating Income as a % of Sales
Adjusted Diluted EPS
12.0% - 12.5%
$1.90 - $2.00
Adjusted operating income for 2013 is expected to consist of GAAP operating income minus non-
recurring, unusual or infrequently occurring items such as acquisition, consolidation and integration
charges, certain RD&E expenditures and asset disposition/write-down charges, totaling approximately
$11.5 million to $14.0 million. This range has been significantly reduced from the 2012 level as we have
essentially completed our current productivity and consolidation initiatives. Included in the above range
are residual DVT costs in the range of $4.8 to $5.8 million to complete our Algostim project.
Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts
In 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded charges in Other Operating Expenses, Net related to cost savings
and consolidation efforts. These initiatives were undertaken to improve our operational efficiencies and
profitability. Additional information regarding the timing, cash flow impact and amount of future
expenditures is set forth in Note 13 ―Other Operating Expenses, Net‖ of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report, as well as the ―Liquidity and Capital Resources‖
section of this Item.
Over the last two years, we have been implementing a multi-faceted plan to further enhance, optimize and
leverage our orthopaedics operations. This plan includes the construction of an orthopaedic manufacturing
facility in Fort Wayne, IN, updating our Indianapolis, IN facility to streamline operations, increase capacity,
- 42 -
and further expand capabilities, and the transfer of most major functions currently performed at our
facilities in Orvin and Corgemont, Switzerland into our Fort Wayne, IN and Tijuana, Mexico facilities. The
total capital investment expected for these initiatives is between $25 million and $35 million, of which $21
million has been expended to date. Total expense expected to be incurred for these initiatives is between
$30 million and $36 million, of which $33.1 million has been incurred to date.
Near the end of 2011, we initiated plans to optimize and expand our manufacturing infrastructure in order to
support our medical device strategy. This included the transfer of certain product lines to lower cost
facilities, expansion of two of our existing facilities, as well as the purchase of equipment to create
additional capacity for the manufacture of medical devices and create additional cost savings. Total capital
investment under these initiatives is expected to be between $15 million to $20 million of which
approximately $9.9 million has been expended to date. Total expenses expected to be incurred on these
projects is between $2 million to $3 million of which $1.5 million has been incurred to date.
These orthopaedic and medical device initiatives are expected to be completed over the next year and are
expected to generate approximately $10 million to $15 million of annual cost savings and increase our
capacity in order to support our growth and the manufacturing of complete medical devices.
In 2011, we initiated plans to upgrade our existing global ERP system. This initiative is expected to be
completed over the next year. Total capital investment under this initiative is expected to be approximately
$4 million to $5 million of which approximately $3.0 million has been expended to date. Total expenses
expected to be incurred on this initiative is between $5 million to $7 million of which $5.0 million has been
incurred to date.
Product Development
Implantable Medical - As a result of the investments we have made, we are able to provide our
Implantable Medical customers with complete medical devices. This medical device strategy is being
facilitated through the QiG Group and includes strategic equity investments and medical devices
developed independently as well as in conjunction with our OEM partners. Today we have four medical
devices that we are independently working on that are in various stages of development. While we do
not intend to discuss each of these projects individually each quarter, we will discuss significant
milestones as they occur. Some of the medical device projects that we currently are working on include:
Cardiovascular portfolio - Venous and arterial introducers, anti-microbial coatings, steerable delivery
systems, and MRI conditional brady, gastric stimulation and sleep apnea leads. During 2012, we
received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (―FDA‖) 510(k) clearance on our transradial catheter
sheath introducer and steerable delivery sheath for atrial fibrillation ablation and received the CE mark
for distribution of our transseptal needle that supports access and delivery of ablation therapies for atrial
fibrillation.
During 2012, Greatbatch Medical observed manufacturing irregularities during inspection of its bi-
directional guiding sheath. This problem was identified after implementing a new inspection tool for use
in performing inspections. As a result, Greatbatch Medical decided to perform a field action on this
product in late 2012. Revenue on this product, which totaled $3.0 million in 2012, is expected to be
temporarily delayed until the second half of 2013.
Neuromodulation portfolio – With regards to Algostim, our spinal cord stimulator for the treatment of
chronic pain in the trunk and limbs, we continue to make strong technical progress on the development
of this device and continue to retire critical milestones needed for program completion and the ultimate
- 43 -
submission to regulatory authorities, which we expect in the second half of 2013. Additionally, we
continue to receive strong interest from numerous world-class medical device companies, who
appreciate the unique opportunity to market and distribute Algostim to interventional pain physicians,
neurosurgeons and orthopaedic spine surgeons around the world. We believe Algostim’s unique
features and benefits will allow the right commercial partner to capture significant market share in
today’s $1.3 billion spinal cord stimulation market, which continues to see double digit market growth.
We look forward to sharing more details regarding Algostim and our commercial partner progress at our
next investor day in March 2013.
Approximately $0.5 million of the NeuroNexus purchase price in February 2012 was allocated to the
estimated fair value of acquired in process research and development (―IPR&D‖). These projects are
expected to generate cash flows but have not yet reached technological feasibility, and thus were
classified as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the completion or abandonment of the associated
projects. The value assigned to IPR&D related to the development of micro-electrodes for deep brain
mapping and electrocorticography. There have been no significant changes from our original estimates
with regards to these projects.
Electrochem - Electrochem continues to win new customers, new applications and next generation
products. Our core competencies enable us to be well-positioned to win existing share and additional
new product introductions based on our experience in packaging solutions, our customer relationships,
our investment in technology and facilities, our capacity to service our customers, and our legacy of
delivering highly reliable and innovative solutions to the medical marketplace.
The growth in Electrochem is being driven by successful product launches into the higher growth,
higher value portable medical market. Gaining better access to this attractive market was one of the
main drivers behind our acquisition of Micro Power as it provides us with a significant opportunity for
growth given its $400 million market size.
Additionally, this market is benefiting from favorable market trends as patient care shifts from clinical
settings to the home and as an aging population drives the need for lightweight and portable devices for
patients and caregivers. These favorable trends are expected to allow this market to grow faster than our
legacy markets over the next several years. Finally, this market is also attractive to us given that it has
long product life cycles that should provide stability and diversification to our revenue base.
Government Regulation
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability
Reconciliation Act (collectively ―Health Care Reform‖) legislated broad-based changes to the U.S.
health care system that could significantly impact our business operations and financial results,
including higher or lower revenue, as well as higher employee medical costs and taxes. Health Care
Reform imposes significant new taxes on medical device OEMs, which will result in a significant
increase in the tax burden on our industry and which could have a material negative impact on our
financial condition, results of operations and our cash flows. Other elements of Health Care Reform
such as comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board, payment system
reforms including shared savings pilots and other provisions could meaningfully change the way
healthcare is developed and delivered, and may materially impact numerous aspects of our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Many significant parts of Health Care Reform will be
phased in over the next several years and require further guidance and clarification in the form of
regulations. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the new medical device tax will have on
our results from operations beginning in 2013, and has preliminarily estimated that it will reduce gross
- 44 -
profit by $1.5 million to $2.5 million. This amount assumes that this tax applies to the first medical
device sale in the U.S. and is based upon a wholesale price.
On August 22, 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (―SEC‖) issued a rule under Section
1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requiring companies to
publicly disclose their use of conflict minerals that originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(―DRC‖) or an adjoining country. Under the adopted rule, issuers are required to conduct a ―reasonable‖
due-diligence process to ascertain the source of conflict minerals, defined as tantalum, tin, gold or
tungsten, that are necessary to the functionality or production of their manufactured or contracted to be
manufactured products. Companies are required to provide this disclosure on a new form to be filed with
the SEC called Form SD. Companies are required to file Form SD on May 31, 2014 for the 2013
calendar period and annually on May 31 every year thereafter. We anticipate additional, new
compliance costs to be incurred since our Implantable Medical business utilizes all of the minerals
specified in the rule, which we are unable to quantify at this time.
Our Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. The methods, estimates
and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we
report in our consolidated financial statements. Management considers an accounting estimate to be
critical if (1) it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made;
and (2) changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected could have a material
impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Our most critical
accounting estimates are described below. We also have other policies that we consider key accounting
policies, such as our policies for revenue recognition; however, these policies do not meet the definition
of critical accounting estimates, because they do not generally require us to make estimates or judgments
that are difficult or subjective.
Valuation of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets
When we acquire a company, we allocate the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets we
acquire and liabilities we assume based on their fair value at the date of acquisition. Some of our
intangible assets are considered non-amortizing intangible assets as they are expected to generate cash
flows indefinitely. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the
estimated fair value of the net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Indefinite-lived
intangibles and goodwill are not amortized but are required to be assessed for impairment on an annual
basis or more frequent if certain indicators are present. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized
over their estimated useful lives and are assessed for impairment if certain indicators are present.
Assumptions/Approach Used
We base the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets on detailed valuations that use
information and assumptions provided by management. The fair values of the assets acquired are
determined using one of three valuation approaches: market, income or cost. The selection of a
particular method depends on the reliability of available data and the nature of the asset. The market
approach values the asset based on available market pricing for comparable assets. The income
approach values the asset based on the present value of risk adjusted cash flows projected to be
generated by that asset. The projected cash flows for each asset considers multiple factors, including
current revenue from existing customers, attrition trends, reasonable contract renewal assumptions from
the perspective of a marketplace participant, and expected profit margins giving consideration to
historical and expected margins. The cost approach values the asset by determining the current cost of
- 45 -
replacing that asset with another of equivalent economic utility. The cost to replace the asset reflects the
estimated reproduction or replacement cost, less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation or
obsolescence, with specific consideration given to economic obsolescence if indicated.
We perform an annual review on the last day of each fiscal year, or more frequently if indicators of
potential impairment exist, to determine if the recorded goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets are impaired. We assess goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of our reporting
units to their carrying value to determine if there is potential impairment. If the fair value of a reporting
unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value
of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair values for reporting units
are determined based on the income and market approaches. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment by using the income approach. Definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed at
least quarterly to determine if any conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would
indicate impairment or a change in their remaining useful life.
We do not believe that the indefinite-lived intangible assets or goodwill allocated to our Implantable
Medical or Electrochem segments are at risk of failing step one of future annual impairment tests unless
operating conditions significantly deteriorate, given the significant amount that our estimated fair value
for these assets was in excess of their respective book values as of December 28, 2012, or if there is a
change in our reporting units.
Effect of Variation of Key Assumptions Used
The use of alternative valuation assumptions, including estimated cash flows and discount rates, and
alternative estimated useful life assumptions could result in different purchase price allocations.
Significant changes in these estimates and assumptions could impact the value of the assets and
liabilities recorded, which would change the amount and timing of future intangible asset amortization
expense.
We make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the expected future cash flows of our reporting
units for our goodwill impairment testing. These include discount rates, terminal values and projections
of future revenues and expenses. Significant changes in these estimates and assumptions could create
future impairment losses to our goodwill. The assumptions used in our 2012 impairment test
incorporate the information disclosed in ―2013 Financial Guidance‖ of this section as well as other
forward-looking statements made in this Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations section.
For our indefinite-lived intangible assets, we make estimates of royalty rates, future revenues and
discount rates. Significant changes in these estimates could create future impairments of these assets.
Estimation of the useful lives of indefinite- and definite-lived intangible assets is based upon the
estimated cash flows of the respective intangible asset and requires significant management judgment.
Events could occur that would materially affect our estimates of the useful lives. Significant changes in
these estimates and assumptions could change the amount of future amortization expense or could create
future impairments of these intangible assets.
The way the Company’s management allocates resources and evaluates its businesses determines the
reporting unit level which goodwill is tested for impairment. Significant changes to these reporting units
could create future impairments of goodwill.
- 46 -
As of December 28, 2012, we have $457.2 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated
balance sheet representing 51% of total assets. This includes $87.3 million of amortizing intangible
assets, $20.8 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets and $349.0 million of goodwill. A 1% change
in the amortization of our intangible assets would change 2012 net income (loss) by approximately
$0.09 million, or approximately $0.004 per diluted share.
Stock-based compensation
We record compensation costs related to our stock-based awards which include stock options, restricted
stock and restricted stock units. We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on
the fair value of the award.
Compensation cost for service-based awards is recognized ratably over the applicable vesting period.
Compensation cost for performance awards based on Company financial metrics is reassessed each
period and recognized based upon the probability that the performance targets will be achieved.
Compensation cost for performance awards based on market metrics (such as total shareholder return) is
expensed each period whether the performance metrics are achieved or not. The amount of stock-based
compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the portion of the awards that are
ultimately expected to vest, as well as market and nonmarket performance award considerations. The
total expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that ultimately vest, as
well as market and nonmarket performance award considerations.
Assumptions/Approach Used
We utilize the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to determine the fair value of stock options. We are
required to make certain assumptions with respect to selected Black-Scholes model inputs, including
expected volatility, expected life, expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate. Expected
volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over the most recent period commensurate with
the estimated expected life of the stock options. The expected life of stock options granted, which
represents the period of time that the stock options are expected to be outstanding, is based, primarily,
on historical data. The expected dividend yield is based on our history and expectation of dividend
payouts. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant for a period commensurate with the estimated expected life.
The fair value of time-based as well as nonmarket-based performance restricted stock and restricted
stock unit awards is equal to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The fair value
of market-based performance restricted stock unit awards is determined by utilizing a Monte Carlo
simulation model, which projects the value of Greatbatch stock versus our peer group under numerous
scenarios and determines the value of the award based upon the present value of these projected
outcomes.
Compensation cost for nonmarket-based performance awards is reassessed each period and recognized
based upon the probability that the performance targets will be achieved. That assessment is based upon
actual and expected future performance.
Stock-based compensation expense is recorded for those awards that are expected to vest, as well as
market and nonmarket performance award considerations. Forfeiture estimates for determining
appropriate stock-based compensation expense are estimated at the time of grant based on historical
experience and demographic characteristics. Revisions are made to those estimates in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimated forfeitures.
- 47 -
Effect of Variation of Key Assumptions Used
Option pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our share-based payments have characteristics
significantly different from those of freely traded options, and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect our estimates of fair values, existing valuation models may not
provide reliable measures of the fair values of our share-based compensation. Consequently, there is a
risk that our estimates of the fair values of our share-based compensation awards may bear little
resemblance to the actual values realized upon the exercise, expiration or forfeiture of those share-based
payments in the future. Stock options may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as
compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly
in excess of the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our consolidated
financial statements. There are significant differences among valuation models. This may result in a
lack of comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions.
There is a high degree of subjectivity involved in selecting assumptions to be utilized to determine fair
value and forfeiture assumptions. If factors change and result in different assumptions in future periods,
the expense that we record for future grants may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the
current period. Additionally, changes in performance of the Company and its stock price will affect the
likelihood that performance-based targets are achieved and could materially impact the amount of stock-
based compensation expense recognized.
A 1% change in our stock-based compensation expense would change 2012 net income (loss) by
approximately $0.07 million, or approximately $0.003 per diluted share.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out method, or market.
Assumptions/Approach Used
Inventory costing requires complex calculations that include assumptions for overhead absorption,
scrap, sample calculations, manufacturing yield estimates and the determination of which costs may be
capitalized. The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate obsolete or excess inventory, as well as
inventory that is not of saleable quality.
Effect of Variation of Key Assumptions Used
Variations in methods or assumptions could have a material impact on our results. If our demand
forecast for specific products is greater than actual demand and we fail to reduce manufacturing output
accordingly, we could be required to record additional inventory write-downs or expense a greater
amount of overhead costs, which would have a negative impact on our net income. As of December 28,
2012, we have $106.6 million of inventory recorded on our consolidated balance sheet representing 12%
of total assets. A 1% write-down of our inventory would change 2012 net income (loss) by
approximately $0.7 million, or approximately $0.03 per diluted share.
- 48 -
Tangible long-lived assets
Property, plant and equipment and other tangible long-lived assets are carried at cost. The cost of
property, plant and equipment is charged to depreciation expense over the estimated life of the operating
assets primarily using straight-line rates. Tangible long-lived assets are subject to impairment
assessment if certain indicators are present.
Assumptions/Approach Used
We assess the impairment of tangible long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the asset (asset group) may not be recoverable. Factors that we
consider in deciding when to perform an impairment review include, but are not limited to: a significant
decrease in the market price of the asset (asset group); a significant change in the extent or manner in
which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; a significant change in
legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group),
including an action or assessment by a regulator; an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the
amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction; a current-period operating or cash flow
loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); or a current
expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed
of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. Recoverability potential is
measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) to the related total future
undiscounted cash flows. The projected cash flows for each asset (asset group) considers multiple
factors, including current revenue from existing customers, proceeds from the sale of the asset (asset
group), reasonable contract renewal assumptions, and expected profit margins giving consideration to
historical and expected margins. If an asset’s (assets group’s) carrying value is not recoverable through
related cash flows, the asset (asset group) is considered to be impaired. Impairment is measured by
comparing the asset’s (asset group’s) carrying amount to its fair value. When it is determined that useful
lives of assets are shorter than originally estimated, and there are sufficient cash flows to support the
carrying value of the assets, we accelerate the rate of depreciation in order to fully depreciate the assets
over their shorter useful lives.
Effect of Variation of Key Assumptions Used
Estimation of the cash flows and useful lives of tangible assets that are long-lived requires significant
management judgment. Events could occur that would materially affect our estimates and assumptions.
Unforeseen changes in operations or technology could substantially alter the assumptions regarding the
ability to realize the return of our investment in long-lived assets or the useful lives. Also, as we make
manufacturing process conversions and other facility consolidation decisions, we must make subjective
judgments regarding the remaining cash flows and useful lives of our assets, primarily manufacturing
equipment and buildings. Significant changes in these estimates and assumptions could change the
amount of future depreciation expense or could create future impairments of these long-lived assets
(asset groups).
As of December 28, 2012 we have $150.9 million of tangible long-lived assets recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet representing 17% of total assets. A 1% write-down in our tangible long-lived
assets would change 2012 net income (loss) by approximately $1.0 million, or approximately $0.04 per
diluted share.
- 49 -
Provision for income taxes
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the asset and liability approach in
accounting for income taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes for the expected
future tax consequences of net operating losses, credits, and temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided
on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.
Assumptions/Approach Used
In recording the provision for income taxes, management must estimate the future tax rates applicable to
the reversal of temporary differences based upon the timing of expected reversal. Also, estimates are
made as to whether taxable operating income in future periods will be sufficient to fully recognize any
gross deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for income taxes by
recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be
recoverable. Alternatively, we may make estimates about the potential usage of deferred tax assets that
decrease our valuation allowances.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax
regulations. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our
provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and
calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We establish reserves for uncertain
tax positions when we believe that certain tax positions do not meet the more likely than not threshold.
We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the outcome of a tax audit
or the lapse of statutes of limitations. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve
provisions and changes to the reserves that are considered appropriate.
Effect of Variation of Key Assumptions Used
Changes could occur that would materially affect our estimates and assumptions regarding deferred
taxes. Changes in current tax laws and tax rates could affect the valuation of deferred tax assets and
liabilities, thereby changing the income tax provision. Also, significant declines in taxable income
could materially impact the realizable value of deferred tax assets. At December 28, 2012, we had $38.5
million of gross deferred tax assets on our consolidated balance sheet and a valuation allowance of $12.8
million has been established for certain deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that they will not
be realized. A 1% change in the effective tax rate would impact the current year provision for income
taxes by $0.07 million, and 2012 diluted earnings (loss) per share by $0.003 per diluted share.
Our Financial Results
We utilize a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st. Fiscal
years 2012, 2011 and 2010 ended on December 28, 2012, December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. Fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 all contained fifty-two weeks.
- 50 -
Results of Operations Table
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Implantable Medical Sales
Year Ended
Dec. 30,
2011
Dec. 31,
2010
Dec. 28,
2012
2012 vs. 2011
%
Change Change
2011 vs. 2010
%
Change
$
Change
$
Cardiac/Neuromodulation
Vascular
Orthopaedic
Total Implantable Medical
Electrochem Sales
Portable medical
Energy/Environmental
Other
Total Electrochem
Total sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Gross profit as a % of sales
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (SG&A)
SG&A as a % of sales
Research, development and
$ 309,124 $ 303,690 $ 303,521 $
45,098
140,277
489,065
51,980
122,061
483,165
38,000
118,748
460,269
5,434
6,882
(18,216)
(5,900)
$
2%
15%
-13%
-1%
169
7,098
21,529
28,796
81,659
67,046
14,307
163,012
646,177
444,528
201,649
31.2%
9,609
58,934
11,214
79,757
568,822
388,469
180,353
31.7%
8,432
54,668
10,056
73,156
533,425
359,844
173,581
32.5%
72,050 NA
14%
28%
8,112
3,093
83,255 104%
77,355
56,059
21,296
14%
14%
12%
1,177
4,266
1,158
6,601
35,397
28,625
6,772
0%
19%
18%
6%
14%
8%
12%
9%
7%
8%
4%
80,992
72,548
64,510
8,444
12%
8,038
12%
12.5%
12.8%
12.1%
engineering costs, net (RD&E)
52,490
45,513
45,019
6,977
15%
494
1%
RD&E as a % of sales
8.1%
8.0%
8.4%
Electrochem litigation gain
-
-
(9,500)
- NA
9,500 -100%
Other operating expenses, net
Operating income
Operating margin
42,346
25,821
4.0%
593
61,699
10.8%
4,558
68,994
41,753 NA
(35,878)
-58%
(3,965)
(7,295)
-87%
-11%
12.9%
Interest expense
Interest income
(Gain) loss on cost and equity method
investments, net
Other expense, net
Provision for income taxes
Effective tax rate
Net income (loss)
Net margin
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
18,055
(1)
16,928
(21)
18,519
(10)
1,127
20
7%
-95%
(1,591)
-9%
(11) 110%
106
931
11,529
171.3%
(4,799) $
(4,232)
632
15,270
31.6%
33,122 $
150
1,010
16,187
4,338 -103%
299
(3,741)
47%
-24%
(4,382) NA
-37%
-6%
(378)
(917)
32.8%
33,138 $ (37,921) -114% $
(16)
0%
-0.7%
(0.20) $
5.8%
1.40 $
6.2%
1.40 $
(2) -114% $
-
0%
$
$
- 51 -
Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011
Sales
Changes to sales by major product lines were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30,
2012 vs. 2011
$
2012
2011
Change
%
Change
Sales:
Implantable Medical
Cardiac/Neuromodulation $
Vascular
Orthopaedic
Total Implantable Medical
Portable Medical
Energy/Environmental
Other
Electrochem
Total sales
$
309,124 $
51,980
122,061
483,165
81,659
67,046
14,307
163,012
646,177 $
303,690 $
45,098
140,277
489,065
9,609
58,934
11,214
79,757
568,822 $
5,434
6,882
(18,216)
(5,900)
72,050
8,112
3,093
83,255
77,355
2%
15%
-13%
-1%
N/A
14%
28%
104%
14%
Implantable Medical – For 2012, our cardiac/neuromodulation sales increased 2% to $309.1 million
which exceeded our expectations. During 2012, cardiac and neuromodulation sales benefited from
further adoption of our Q series batteries partially offset by the timing of customer inventory builds and
product launches between 2011 and 2012. Management remains cautiously optimistic over the short-
term prospects of this product line given the continued ongoing challenges surrounding some of our key
cardiac customers. It is important to note that our visibility to customer ordering patterns is over a short
period of time and that any significant customer field actions or relative market share shifts among OEM
manufacturers could impact our results. We believe that the impact of these factors is somewhat muted
by the fact that we have business with all of the key cardiac OEMs and have significantly diversified our
revenue base. Additionally, we continue to see an increased pace of product development opportunities
from our customers. Management believes that this, combined with our increased focus on sales and
marketing, will allow the Company to grow this product line faster than the underlying market.
For 2012, our vascular product line sales increased 15% to $52.0 million. This increase was primarily
attributable to growth in the underlying market and market share gains. Additionally, vascular revenue
for the year included $6.6 million from sales of medical devices that were developed under the
Greatbatch name compared to $4.5 million for 2011, an increase of 47%.
Orthopaedic product line sales for 2012 declined 13% compared to the same period of 2011. On a
constant currency basis, orthopaedic sales declined 8% for 2012 as foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations decreased orthopaedic revenue by approximately $6 million. The remaining decline in 2012
orthopaedic sales was a result of price concessions provided to customers, as well as fewer customer
product launches and development opportunities due to operational issues at our Swiss orthopaedic
facilities, which were aggressively addressed in 2012. In addition to the consolidation of manufacturing,
during 2012, we also streamlined our Swiss orthopaedic product line offerings. This included the sale of
several non-core product lines to an independent third party near the end of the year, which closed in
early 2013. Our current estimate is that the sale of these products will reduce our 2013 orthopaedic
- 52 -
revenue by approximately $15 million in comparison to 2012. For 2013, we expect our performance to
improve as we progress through the year, as the first quarter of 2013 will be impacted by the startup of
these recently transferred orthopaedic production lines. The second half of the year is expected to
improve as this orthopaedic backlog is relieved.
Our Implantable Medical customers have various inventory management, dual sourcing, and vertical
integration initiatives in place, and the relative market share among OEM manufacturers’ changes
continuously. Additionally, we face pricing pressures from our customers and in particular our four
largest OEM customers upon which a significant portion of our sales is dependent. These pressures have
increased over the last several years due to the downturn in the global economy, and more specifically,
the contracting CRM market. Consequently, these and other factors will continue to significantly impact
our sales.
Electrochem – 2012 sales for Electrochem increased $83.3 million to $163.0 million. 2012 Electrochem
sales included $82.4 million of incremental revenue related to the acquisition of Micro Power in
December 2011. On an organic basis, Electrochem revenue was consistent with the prior year. During
2012, the Micro Power acquisition exceeded our expectations, which is benefitting from successful
product launches into the higher growth, higher value portable medical market. The market shift in
patient care from clinical settings to the home, and an aging population, is driving the need for
lightweight and portable devices for patients and caregivers. Electrochem’s technology, customer
relationships, and legacy of delivering highly reliable and innovative solutions has enabled it to win in
this evolving market and continues to position Electrochem to capture market share. Electrochem
continues to secure long-term agreements in this space and our funnel of portable medical products from
this acquisition continues to be full, which is expected to drive revenue growth for this product line for
the next several years.
Gross Profit
Changes to gross profit as a percentage of sales were primarily due to the following:
Impact of acquisitions(a)
Excess capacity & Swiss production inefficiencies(b)
Volume and productivity(c)
Performance-based compensation(d)
Selling price(e)
Other
Total percentage point change to gross profit as a
2012-2011
% Point Change
-1.2%
-1.6%
2.2%
0.4%
-0.5%
0.2%
percentage of sales
-0.5%
(a) Our gross profit percentage was impacted by the acquisition of Micro Power in December 2011,
which had a lower gross margin percentage due to its higher percentage of material costs in
comparison to our legacy businesses. Additionally, during 2012 we recognized $0.5 million of
inventory step-up amortization in connection with this acquisition, which will not recur in subsequent
periods.
(b) Our gross profit percentage was negatively impacted during 2012 due to production inefficiencies at
our Swiss orthopaedic facilities. Additionally, as a result of the addition of our Fort Wayne facility in
- 53 -
the second quarter of 2012, we experienced excess capacity costs in comparison to 2011. In
accordance with our inventory accounting policy, excess capacity costs are expensed in the period
they occur. In 2012, we aggressively right-sized our orthopaedic cost structure, which is expected to
help improve our gross margin percentage starting in the first quarter of 2013.
(c) Our gross profit percentage benefitted from higher sales volumes, primarily cardiac and vascular, as
well as production efficiencies gained at our manufacturing facilities as a result of our various lean
and supply chain initiatives.
(d) Amount represents lower performance-based compensation expense recorded based upon the results
for 2012 compared to 2011. Performance-based compensation is accrued based upon the level of
performance achieved relative to targets set at the beginning of the year.
(e) Our gross profit percentage has been negatively impacted in comparison to the prior year by price
concessions made to our larger OEM customers, which were given in exchange for long-term
contracts.
Over the long-term, we expect to see gross margin improvements as a result of the consolidation of our
orthopaedic operations and from various other productivity improvement initiatives that are being
implemented (See ―Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts‖ section of this item). Additionally, we
expect our gross profit margin to improve as more system and device level products are introduced,
which typically earn a higher margin. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the new
medical device tax will have on our results from operations beginning in 2013, and has preliminarily
estimated that it will reduce gross profit by $1.5 million to $2.5 million. This amount assumes that this
tax applies to the first medical device sale in the U.S. and is based upon a wholesale price.
SG&A Expenses
Changes to SG&A expenses were primarily due to the following (in thousands):
Impact of acquisitions(a)
Professional and consulting expense(b)
Medical device strategy communication(c)
Other(d)
Net increase in SG&A
$
$
2012-2011
$ Change
9,552
743
(501)
(1,350)
8,444
(a) Amount represents the incremental SG&A expenses in 2012 versus 2011 related to the acquisition of
Micro Power and NeuroNexus.
(b) Amount represents the change in professional and consulting expense from 2011 and reflects a higher
level of costs incurred in connection with our medical device strategy and our increased investment in
sales and marketing to drive core business growth.
(c) Amount represents the costs incurred during 2011 in connection with the communication of our
medical device strategy to shareholders, customers and associates including costs incurred for our
Investor Day held in the first quarter of 2011, which did not recur in 2012.
(d) Amount represents various decreases in SG&A expenses during 2012 and reflects the cost control
initiatives being implemented by the Company including cost reductions in connection with our
Swiss orthopaedic consolidations.
- 54 -
RD&E Expenses, Net
Net RD&E costs were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
Change
Research and development costs
Engineering costs
Less cost reimbursements
Total RD&E, net
$
$
24,071 $
38,777
(10,358)
52,490 $
19,014 $
35,472
(8,973)
45,513 $
5,057
3,305
(1,385)
6,977
Net RD&E for 2012 increased $7.0 million to $52.5 million. Approximately $2.6 million of this
increase was a result of the operations from our recent acquisitions. Additionally, $3.2 million of this
increase can be attributed to the investment in the development of complete medical devices, which
totaled $24.8 million for 2012 compared to $21.6 million for 2011. These amounts include $5.2 million
and $5.1 million, respectively, of DVT costs in connection with our development of a neuromodulation
platform. When combined with SG&A expenses, total costs incurred in connection with our medical
device initiatives totaled $33.9 million for 2012 versus $27.3 million for 2011.
During the second half of 2012, we began to implement an initiative to optimize our RD&E investment.
This included the reallocation of RD&E resources to higher priority projects, the postponement of some
RD&E projects, as well as the decision to pursue various alternatives to monetize some of our existing
intellectual property that are outside our core business. As a result of this initiative, RD&E for the second
half of 2012 was $3.7 million lower than the first half of 2012. These reductions are also expected to
benefit 2013.
The increase in cost reimbursements in 2012 was a result of our NeuroNexus acquisition. These cost
reimbursements can vary significantly from year to year due to the timing of the achievement of
milestones on development projects.
Other Operating Expenses, Net
Other operating expenses, net were comprised of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30,
2012
2011
Change
Orthopaedic facility optimization(a)
Medical device facility optimization(a)
ERP system upgrade(a)
Integration costs(b)
Asset dispositions, severance and other(c)
Total other operating expenses, net
$
$
32,482 $
1,525
5,041
1,460
1,838
42,346 $
425 $
-
-
-
168
593 $
32,057
1,525
5,041
1,460
1,670
41,753
(a) Refer to ―Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts‖ section of this Item and Note 13 ―Other
Operating Expenses, Net‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
- 55 -
this report for disclosures related to the timing and level of remaining expenditures for these
initiatives.
(b) During 2012, we incurred costs related to the integration of Micro Power and NeuroNexus. These
expenses were primarily for retention bonuses, travel costs in connection with integration efforts,
and severance, which will not be required in 2013 as these integrations are completed.
(c) During 2012 and 2011, we recorded write-downs in connection with various asset disposals, net of
insurance proceeds received, if any. Additionally, during 2012, we incurred $1.2 million of costs
related to the relocation of our global headquarters to Frisco, Texas. During 2011, we incurred $0.6
million of acquisition related costs in connection with our purchase of Micro Power.
Other operating expenses will be reduced significantly in 2013 and are expected to range from $6.7
million - $8.2 million, which will improve the overall earnings of Greatbatch. While we continually
identify and implement cost improvement initiatives, we have now completed all of our major plant
consolidations, so our leadership team can focus on achieving sustainable organic growth and leverage
our available capacity.
Interest Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense for 2012 increased $1.1 million over 2011 due to the increased discount amortization
related to our convertible notes, which is being amortized utilizing the effective interest method. See
Note 9 ―Debt‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
Interest income for 2012 was relatively consistent with 2011.
Gain (Loss) on Cost and Equity Method Investments, Net
In 2011, we sold our cost method investment in IntElect Medical, Inc. (―IntElect‖) in conjunction with
Boston Scientific’s acquisition of IntElect. We obtained our ownership interest in IntElect through our
acquisition of BIOMEC, Inc. in 2007 and two subsequent additional investments. This transaction
resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.5 million. During 2012 and 2011, we recognized impairment charges
related to our cost and equity method investments of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The
aggregate recorded amount of our cost and equity method investments at December 28, 2012 was $9.1
million. These investments are in start-up research and development companies whose fair value is
highly subjective in nature and subject to future fluctuations, which could be significant. Our exposure
related to these entities is limited to our recorded investment.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net primarily includes the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on
transactions denominated in foreign currencies. We generally do not expect foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations to have a material impact on our results of operations.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 28, 2012 was 171.3%, versus 31.6% for 2011. The
stand-alone U.S. component of the effective tax rate for the year ended December 28, 2012 was 33.1%
versus 31.5% for 2011.
- 56 -
The provision for income taxes for 2012 differs from the U.S. statutory rate due to the following (dollars
in thousands):
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes
$ 36,057
$ (29,327)
$ 6,730
U.S.
$
%
International
%
$
Combined
$
%
Provision at statutory rate
Foreign rate differential
Change in tax rate - loss of Swiss tax
holiday
Uncertain tax positions
State taxes, net of federal benefit
Valuation allowance
Other
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes/effective tax rate
$ 12,620 35.0 % $ (10,265) 35.0 % $ 2,355
3,414
3,414 (11.6)
-
-
35.0 %
50.7
-
(681)
329
-
(350)
-
(1.9)
0.9
-
(0.9)
1,721
-
-
(5.9)
-
-
4,552 (15.5)
(0.6)
189
1,721
(681)
329
4,552
(161)
25.6
(10.1)
4.9
67.6
(2.4)
$ 11,918 33.1 % $
(389)
1.4 % $ 11,529 171.3 %
The fluctuation between the overall rate of 171.3% in 2012 and the 31.6% in 2011 is primarily attributable
to approximately $6.2 million of tax charges (approximately 92% increase in our effective tax rate)
recorded in connection with our Swiss orthopaedic restructuring. These charges relate to the loss of our
Swiss tax holiday, due to our 2012 decision to transfer manufacturing out of Switzerland, as well as the
establishment of a valuation allowance on a portion of our Swiss deferred tax assets as it is more likely
than not that they will not be fully realized. Additionally, our 2012 effective tax rate reflects the impact of
approximately $31.3 million of losses resulting from our Swiss restructuring, the benefit of which are
recorded at the lower Swiss effective tax rate, thus giving rise to an approximate 57% increase in the
overall effective tax rate of the Company.
The fluctuation of the effective tax rate for the U.S. between 2012 (33.1%) and 2011 (31.5%) is primarily
attributable to the expiration of the U.S. R&D tax credit at the end of 2011. On January 2, 2013, the
President signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which includes a retroactive
extension of the section 41 R&D tax credit that had expired on December 31, 2011. Under the American
Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the tax R&D credit is extended for two years retroactively from January 1,
2012 through December 31, 2013. As the R&D tax credit was signed into law on January 2, 2013, as
required by GAAP, the benefit for the R&D tax credits earned in 2012 will be recognized in the first
quarter of fiscal 2013. R&D tax credits earned in 2013 will be recorded through the fiscal 2013 effective
tax rate. We estimate that the benefit related to the 2012 R&D tax credits will be approximately $1.5
million.
There is a potential for volatility of the effective tax rate due to several factors, including changes in the
mix of pre-tax income and the jurisdictions to which it relates, business acquisitions, settlements with
taxing authorities and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
We believe it is reasonably possible that a reduction of up to $0.1 million of the balance of our
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of
applicable statutes of limitation and potential audit settlements, which would positively impact the
effective tax rate in the period of reduction.
- 57 -
Fiscal 2011 Compared with Fiscal 2010
Sales
Changes to sales by major product lines were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
2011 vs. 2010
%
$
Change Change
Sales:
Implantable Medical
Cardiac/Neuromodulation $
Vascular
Orthopaedic
Total Implantable Medical
Portable Medical
Energy/Environmental
Other
Electrochem
Total sales
$
303,690 $
45,098
140,277
489,065
9,609
58,934
11,214
79,757
568,822 $
303,521 $
38,000
118,748
460,269
8,432
54,668
10,056
73,156
533,425 $
169
0%
7,098 19%
21,529 18%
28,796
6%
1,177 14%
4,266
8%
1,158 12%
9%
6,601
7%
35,397
Implantable Medical – For the year, cardiac/neuromodulation sales were consistent with 2010. During
the first half of 2011, cardiac revenue included the benefit of customer inventory builds and product
launches, which did not recur in the second half of 2011. Additionally, cardiac/neuromodulation sales
were impacted by pricing pressures and a slowdown in the underlying market.
Full year 2011 vascular sales increased 19% over 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to
growth in the underlying market and market share gains. Additionally, vascular revenue for 2011
included approximately $4.5 million from sales of medical devices that were developed under the
Greatbatch name, including sales of our OptiSeal Valved Peelable Introducer which received FDA
clearance in 2010.
Orthopaedic sales of $140.3 million for 2011 were 18% above 2010, and included approximately $8
million of favorable foreign currency exchange rate benefit. Excluding this benefit, sales increased 11%
organically over 2010 despite slower than expected underlying market growth. These increases
occurred across all of our orthopaedic products, which benefitted from customer product launches, as
well as from market share gains during 2011.
Electrochem – For 2011, sales for the Electrochem business segment increased 9% in comparison to
2010. Fourth quarter 2011 sales for Electrochem included $2.5 million of additional revenue from the
Micro Power acquisition. Excluding the additional revenue provided by Micro Power, sales for 2011
increased 6% on an organic basis. During 2011, Electrochem revenue varied from quarter to quarter due
to the timing of various customer inventory pulls. For the full year, the increase in Electrochem revenue
was a result of an increased investment in sales and marketing, which resulted in market share gains and
several new customer contracts, as well as continued strength in the energy markets.
- 58 -
Gross Profit
Changes to gross profit as a percentage of sales were primarily due to the following:
Capacity & productivity(a)
Performance-based compensation(b)
Mix change(c)
Selling price(d)
Other
Total percentage point change to gross profit as a
percentage of sales
2011-2010
% Point Change
0.9%
-0.9%
-0.5%
-0.8%
0.5%
-0.8%
(a) Our gross profit percentage for 2011 benefitted from higher sales volumes, which absorbed excess
capacity, as well as productivity gains from our various lean initiatives.
(b) Amount represents higher performance-based compensation expense recorded based upon the results
for 2011 compared to 2010. Performance-based compensation is accrued based upon the level of
performance achieved relative to targets set at the beginning of the year.
(c) Our gross profit percentage for 2011 was negatively impacted by a lower mix of higher-margin
cardiac/neuromodulation sales as a percentage of total sales compared to 2010.
(d) Our gross profit percentage throughout 2011 was negatively impacted, in comparison to 2010, by
price concessions made to our larger OEM customers near the end of 2010, which were given in
exchange for long-term contracts.
SG&A Expenses
Changes to SG&A expenses were primarily due to the following (in thousands):
Performance-based compensation(a)
Professional and consulting expense(b)
Litigation related fees and charges(c)
Executive death benefits(d)
Micro Power SG&A costs(e)
Other
Net increase in SG&A
2011-2010
$ Change
3,935
5,224
(808)
(885)
358
214
8,038
$
$
(a) SG&A costs for 2011 include a higher level of performance-based compensation expense due to
achieving a higher percentage of our targets in 2011 in comparison to 2010. Performance-based
compensation is accrued based upon management’s expectation of performance relative to targets set.
(b) Amount represents the change in professional and consulting expense from 2010 and reflects a higher
level of costs incurred in connection with our medical device strategy, which impacted SG&A by $4.0
million. These costs included consulting fees paid to outside contractors who are providing technical
expertise on our device projects, as well as legal fees incurred in connection with the numerous patent
filings that we are making.
- 59 -
(c) During 2010, the Company incurred fees and charges in connection with two litigation matters that
were subsequently settled near the end of 2010. Accordingly, litigation related fees and charges
were lower during 2011 in comparison to the prior year.
(d) SG&A expenses for 2010 include death benefits provided to the family of the Company’s former Senior
Vice President - Orthopaedics.
(e) Amount represents the SG&A costs related to the operations of Micro Power, which was acquired on
December 15, 2011.
RD&E Expenses, Net
Net RD&E costs were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
Change
Research and development costs
Engineering costs
Less cost reimbursements
Total RD&E, net
$
$
19,014 $
35,472
(8,973)
45,513 $
17,378 $
34,208
(6,567)
45,019 $
1,636
1,264
(2,406)
494
Net RD&E costs for 2011 totaled $45.5 million, or 8.0% of sales, versus $45.0 million, or 8.4% of sales
for 2010. During 2011, we continued to invest resources in developing complete medical devices for
our OEM customers. Total RD&E costs incurred in connection with our medical device initiatives were
$21.6 million during 2011 compared to $20.3 million in 2010. This included $5.1 million of design
verification testing costs expensed in 2011 related to the QiG Group’s development of a
neuromodulation platform. When combined with the SG&A expenses discussed above, total costs
incurred in connection with our medical device initiatives totaled $27.3 million in 2011 versus $21.9
million in 2010.
Partially offsetting these RD&E increases was a higher level of customer cost reimbursements of $2.4
million for 2011. These cost reimbursements can vary significantly from period to period due to the
timing of the achievement of milestones on development projects.
Electrochem Litigation Charge (Gain)
In 2009, a Louisiana jury found in favor of a former Electrochem customer on their claims made in
connection with a failed business transaction dating back to 1997. During 2009, we accrued $34.5
million in connection with this litigation after the unfavorable jury verdict. In the fourth quarter of
2010, we settled this litigation for $25 million and accordingly recognized a $9.5 million gain. See Note
15 ―Commitments and Contingencies‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this report.
- 60 -
Other Operating Expenses, Net
Other operating expenses, net were comprised of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 30, December 31,
2011
2010
Change
Orthopaedic facility optimization(a)
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and
consolidations(b)
Integration costs(c)
Asset dispositions, severance and other(d)
Total other operating expenses, net
$
$
425 $
-
-
168
593 $
225 $
200
1,348
42
2,943
4,558 $
(1,348)
(42)
(2,775)
(3,965)
(a) During the third quarter of 2010, we began to incur costs in connection with the optimization of our
orthopaedic operations in order to increase capacity, further expand our capabilities and reduce
dependence on outside suppliers.
(b) In 2010, we recorded charges related to our various cost savings and consolidation efforts initiated in
2007 and 2008.
(c) During 2010, we incurred costs related to the integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and
2008.
(d) During 2011 and 2010, we recorded write-downs in connection with various asset disposals, net of
insurance proceeds received, if any. Additionally, during 2011 we incurred $0.6 million of
acquisition related costs in connection with our purchase of Micro Power. During 2010, we
consolidated our Implantable Medical segment, which included the elimination of certain positions
globally. Severance charges associated with this realignment were $2.3 million.
Interest Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense for 2011 decreased $1.6 million from 2010 primarily due to the repayment of $118.5
million of long-term debt during 2011 and 2010 as well as the impact of lower interest rates, partially
offset by increased discount amortization on our convertible notes. Interest income for 2011 was
relatively consistent with 2010.
Gain (Loss) on Cost and Equity Method Investments
In 2011, we sold our cost method investment in IntElect in conjunction with Boston Scientific’s
acquisition of IntElect. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.5 million. During 2011 and 2010,
we recognized impairment charges related to our cost method investments of $0.3 million and $0.2
million, respectively, based upon recent stock offerings by those companies.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net primarily includes the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on
transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
- 61 -
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for 2011 was 31.6% versus 32.8% for 2010. The effective tax rates for 2011 and
2010 are lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the R&D tax credit, as well as the favorable
impact of the resolution of tax audits and the lapse of statutes of limitation on certain tax items. See
Note 14 ―Income Taxes‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this
report for a reconciliation of the U.S. statutory rate to our effective tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
Working capital
Current ratio
At
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
20,284
176,376
2.92
$
$
36,508
170,907
2.82
The decrease in cash and cash equivalents from the end of 2011 was primarily due to the cash used in
connection with our acquisitions ($17.2 million), the purchase of property, plant and equipment ($41.1
million) in connection with our various cost savings and consolidation initiatives, and the net repayment
of long-term debt ($22 million) during the year partially offset by cash flows from operations ($64.8
million). Our working capital and current ratio remained consistent with the prior year. Of the $20.3
million of cash on hand as of December 28, 2012, $4.5 million is being held at our foreign subsidiaries.
Revolving Line of Credit – We have a senior credit facility (the ―Credit Facility‖) consisting of a $400
million revolving line of credit, which can be increased to $600 million upon our request and approval
by a majority of the lenders. The Credit Facility also contains a $15 million letter of credit subfacility
and a $15 million swingline subfacility. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of June 24, 2016;
provided, however, if our convertible subordinated notes (―CSN‖) are not repaid in full, modified or
refinanced before March 1, 2013, the maturity date of the Credit Facility is March 1, 2013. On February
20, 2013, we redeemed all outstanding CSN, which was funded with availability under the Credit
Facility.
The Credit Facility is supported by a consortium of fourteen banks with no bank controlling more than
19% of the facility. As of December 28, 2012, each bank supporting the Credit Facility has an S&P
credit rating of at least BBB or better, which is considered investment grade.
The Credit Facility requires us to maintain a rolling four quarter ratio of adjusted EBITDA to interest
expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0. For the twelve month period ended December 28, 2012, our ratio of
adjusted EBITDA to interest expense, calculated in accordance with our credit agreement, was 17.3 to
1.00, well above the required limit. The Credit Facility also requires us to maintain a total leverage ratio
of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of December 28, 2012, our total leverage ratio, calculated in
accordance with our credit agreement, was 2.2 to 1.00, well below the required limit.
The Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the
continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may declare the outstanding advances and
all other obligations under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable. See Note 9 ―Debt‖ of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
- 62 -
As of December 28, 2012, we had $367 million of borrowing capacity available under the Credit
Facility. As of February 27, 2013, we had available $174 million of borrowing capacity available under
the Credit Facility as a result of the redemption of all CSN in February 2013. This amount may vary
from period to period based upon our debt and EBITDA levels, which impacts the covenant calculations
discussed above. We believe that our cash flow from operations and the Credit Facility provide adequate
liquidity to meet our short and long term funding needs.
Operating activities – Cash flows from operating activities for 2012 were $64.8 million compared to $89.9
million for 2011. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities from the prior year is primarily due
to our lower net income as well as a slight increase in working capital balances.
Investing activities – Net cash used in investing activities for 2012 was $59.8 million compared to $80.4
million for 2011. This decrease was primarily related to the cash payments made in 2011 for the
acquisition of Micro Power of $66.5 million, partially offset by $18.6 million of additional investments
made in property, plant and equipment primarily in connection with the consolidation and optimization
initiatives discussed in the ―Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts‖ section of this Item (primarily the
construction of our Fort Wayne facility which was completed in 2012) and routine capital expenditures.
Our current expectation is that capital spending for 2013 will be in the range of $20 million to $30
million, of which approximately half is discretionary in nature. We anticipate that cash on hand, cash
flow from operations and availability under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund these capital
expenditures. As part of our growth strategy, we have and will continue to consider targeted and
opportunistic acquisitions.
Financing activities – Net cash used in financing activities for 2012 was $21.5 million compared to cash
provided of $3.7 million for the prior year period. During 2012, we repaid $32 million of long-term debt
which was partially offset by $10 million borrowed at the beginning of the year to help fund the
NeuroNexus acquisition. On February 20, 2013, we redeemed all of our outstanding CSN, which was
funded with availability under the Credit Facility. See Note 9 ―Debt‖ of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements contained at Item 8 of this report for further discussion. Going forward, we expect
excess cash flow from operations to primarily be used to pay down outstanding debt as well as to fund
our various capital projects.
Capital Structure – As of December 28, 2012, our capital structure consisted of $197.8 million of
convertible subordinated notes, $33.0 million of debt under our revolving line of credit and 23.7 million
shares of common stock outstanding. Additionally, we had $20.3 million in cash and cash equivalents,
which we believe is sufficient to meet our short-term operating cash needs. If necessary, we have
available borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility and are authorized to issue 100 million shares of
common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. As of February 27, 2013, we had available $174
million of borrowing capacity available under the Credit Facility as a result of the redemption of all CSN
in February 2013. We believe that if needed we can access public markets to raise additional capital. We
believe that our capital structure provides adequate funding to meet our growth objectives. We
continuously evaluate our capital structure as it relates to our anticipated long-term funding needs.
Changes to our capital structure may occur as a result of this analysis, or changes in market conditions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
- 63 -
Litigation
We are party to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. A description of pending
legal actions against the Company is set forth at Note 15 ―Commitments and Contingencies‖ of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained at Item 8 of this report. We do not believe that
the ultimate resolution of any individual pending legal action will have a material effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. However, litigation is subject to
inherent uncertainties and there can be no assurance that any pending legal action, which we currently
believe to be immaterial, does not become material in the future.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 28, 2012:
Payments due by period
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
$
Debt obligations(a)
Operating lease obligations(b)
Purchase obligations(b)
Foreign currency contracts(b)
Defined benefit plan obligations(c)
Total contractual obligations
$
Total
270,469 $
19,044
24,710
12,000
11,783
338,006 $
Less than 1
year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5
years
229,676 $
4,601
12,914
12,000
8,813
268,004 $
3,800 $
8,134
5,378
-
561
17,873 $
35,776 $
4,379
6,298
-
671
47,124 $
1,217
1,930
120
-
1,738
5,005
(a) Includes the annual interest expense on our convertible subordinated notes of 2.25%, which is paid
semi-annually, and the $33.0 million outstanding on our Credit Facility based upon the period end
weighted average interest rate of 2.07%. Also includes $36.6 million of deferred federal and state
taxes on the Company’s convertible subordinated notes that will be due between 2013 and 2018.
This table does not reflect the redemption of all outstanding CSN on February 20, 2013, which was
funded with availability under the Credit Facility. CSN were classified as long-term in the December
28, 2012 Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with ASC 470. See Note 9 ―Debt‖ of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
(b) See Note 15 ―Commitments and Contingencies‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in Item 8 of this report for additional information about our operating leases, purchase
obligations and foreign currency contracts.
(c) See Note 10 ―Defined Benefit Plans‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this report for additional information about our defined benefit plan obligations. During
2012, we transferred most major functions performed at our facilities in Switzerland into existing
facilities. As a result, we curtailed our defined benefit plan provided to employees at those facilities
in 2012. As nearly all of the Swiss pension liability is expected to be paid off in the next year, the
Company moved all Swiss pension plan investments into cash accounts during the quarter. Plan
assets are expected to be sufficient to cover plan liabilities.
This table does not reflect $1.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits as we are uncertain as to if or when
such amounts may be settled. Refer to Note 14 ―Income Taxes‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this report for additional information about these unrecognized tax benefits.
- 64 -
We self-fund the medical insurance coverage provided to our U.S. based employees. We limit our risk
through the use of stop loss insurance. As of December 28, 2012, we had $1.4 million accrued, related to
our self-insurance obligations under our medical plan. This accrual is recorded in Accrued Expenses in
the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and is primarily based upon claim history. For 2013, we have specific
stop loss coverage per associate for claims in the year exceeding $225 thousand per associate with no
annual maximum aggregate stop loss coverage. This table does not reflect any potential future payments
for self-insured medical claims.
We were a member of a group self-insurance trust that provided workers’ compensation benefits to our
employees in Western New York (the ―Trust‖). Based on actual experience, we could receive a refund
or be assessed additional contributions for workers’ compensation claims. Under the Trust agreement,
each participating organization has joint and several liability for Trust obligations if the assets of the
Trust are not sufficient to cover those obligations. During 2011, we were notified by the Trust of its
intention to cease operations at the end of 2011 and were assessed $0.6 million as an estimate of our pro-
rata share of future costs related to the Trust. This amount was accrued and paid in 2011. Beginning in
2012, we utilized traditional insurance to provide workers’ compensation benefits to our employees.
Inflation
We utilize certain critical raw materials (including precious metals) in our products that we obtain from
a limited number of suppliers due to the technically challenging requirements of the supplied product
and/or the lengthy process required to qualify these materials with our customers. We cannot quickly
establish additional or replacement suppliers for these materials because of these requirements. Our
results may be negatively impacted by an increase in the price of these critical raw materials. This risk
is partially mitigated as many of the supply agreements with our customers allow us to partially adjust
prices for the impact of any raw material price increases and the supply agreements with our vendors
have final one-time buy clauses to meet a long-term need. Historically, raw material price increases
have not materially impacted our results of operations.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In the normal course of business, we evaluate all new accounting pronouncements issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (―FASB‖), SEC, Emerging Issues Task Force (―EITF‖),
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (―AICPA‖) or other authoritative accounting body to
determine the potential impact they may have on our Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 1
―Summary of Significant Accounting Policies‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in Item 8 of this report for additional information about these recently issued accounting
standards and their potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency – We have significant operations in France, Mexico and Switzerland, which expose
the Company to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations due to transactions denominated in Euros,
Mexican pesos and Swiss francs, respectively. We continuously evaluate our foreign currency risk and
will take action from time to time in order to best mitigate these risks, which includes the use of various
derivative instruments such as forward currency exchange rate contracts. A hypothetical 10% change in
the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to our most significant foreign currency exposures would have had
an impact of approximately $8 million on our annual sales. This amount is not indicative of the
hypothetical net earnings impact due to offsetting impacts on cost of sales and operating expenses in
those currencies. We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations during 2012 decreased
sales in comparison to 2011 by approximately $6 million.
- 65 -
In September 2011, we entered into two forward contracts to purchase 6.5 million and 4.9 million
Mexican pesos per month beginning in January 2012 through December 2012 at an exchange rate of
$0.0767 and $0.0713 per peso, respectively. These contracts were entered into in order to hedge the risk
of peso-denominated payments associated with a portion of the operations at our Tijuana, Mexico
facility for 2012 and are being accounted for as cash flow hedges.
In May 2012, we entered into two forward contracts to purchase 6.9 million and 7.2 million Mexican
pesos per month beginning in January 2013 through December 2013 at an exchange rate of $0.0727 and
$0.0693 per peso, respectively. These contracts were entered into in order to hedge the risk of peso-
denominated payments associated with a portion of the operations at our Tijuana, Mexico facility for
2013 and are being accounted for as cash flow hedges.
As of December 28, 2012, these contracts had a positive fair value of $0.8 million, which is recorded
within Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The amount
recorded as a reduction of Cost of Sales during 2012 related to these forward contracts was $0.08
million. No portion of the change in fair value of our foreign currency contracts during 2012 was
considered ineffective.
We translate all assets and liabilities of our foreign operations, where the U.S. dollar is not the functional
currency, at the period-end exchange rate and translate sales and expenses at the average exchange rates
in effect during the period. The net effect of these translation adjustments is recorded in the
Consolidated Financial Statements as Comprehensive Income (Loss). The translation adjustment for
2012 was a $1.9 million gain. Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to
permanent investments in our foreign subsidiaries. Net foreign currency transaction gains and losses
included in Other Expense, Net amounted to a loss of $0.3 million for 2012. A hypothetical 10%
change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to our most significant foreign currency net assets
would have had an impact of approximately $8 million on our foreign net assets as of December 28,
2012.
Interest Rates – Interest rates on our Credit Facility reset, at our option, based upon the prime rate or
LIBOR rate, thus subjecting us to interest rate risk. To help offset this risk, from time to time, we enter
into receive floating-pay fixed interest rate swaps indexed to the same applicable index rate as the debt it
is hedging. The objective of these swaps is to hedge against potential changes in cash flows on our
outstanding revolving line of credit. No credit risk is hedged. Our interest rate swaps are accounted for
as cash flow hedges. As of December 28, 2012, we had $33 million outstanding on our Credit Facility,
none of which is being hedged. See Note 9 ―Debt‖ of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained at Item 8 of this report for additional information about our outstanding debt. A hypothetical
one percentage point change in the prime rate on the $33 million of floating rate revolving line of credit
debt outstanding at December 28, 2012 would have an impact of approximately $0.3 million on our
interest expense.
In October 2012 we entered into a three-year $150 million interest rate swap, which amortizes $50
million per year. Under terms of the contract, we will receive a floating interest rate indexed to the one-
month LIBOR rate and pay a fixed interest rate of 0.573%. The swap will be effective in February 2013.
This swap was entered into in order to hedge against potential changes in cash flows on the outstanding
debt on the Credit Facility from the repayment of our CSN in February 2013 and indexed to the one-
month LIBOR rate. The receive variable leg of the interest rate swap and the variable rate paid on the
debt bear the same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and reset and pay interest on the same
dates. This swap will be accounted for as a cash flow hedge.
- 66 -
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following are set forth below:
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2012 and December 30,
2011
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the years ended December 28, 2012, December 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 28,
2012, December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended
December 28, 2012, December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 67 -
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Company’s certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed
and maintained under the supervision of its certifying officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial
statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
As of December 28, 2012, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2012 is effective.
In conducting the evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 28, 2012, as permitted by the guidance issued by the Office of the Chief Accountant of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, management excluded the following subsidiary acquired in 2012:
NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc.
This subsidiary represented approximately 3% and 2% of net and total assets, respectively, and 0.4% of
revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 28,
2012. See Note 2 – ―Acquisitions‖ for a discussion of this acquisition and its impact on the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2012 has been audited
by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Dated: February 27, 2013
_____________________________
Thomas J. Hook
President & Chief Executive Officer
______________________________________
Michael Dinkins
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
- 68 -
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Greatbatch, Inc.
Frisco, Texas
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Greatbatch, Inc. and subsidiary (the
"Company") as of December 28, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As
described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded
from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc.,
which was acquired on February 16, 2012 and whose financial statements constitute 3% and 2% of net
and total assets, respectively, and 0.4% of revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as
of and for the year ended December 28, 2012. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control
over financial reporting at NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc. The Company's management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision
of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility
of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud
may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that
- 69 -
the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 28, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and
for the year ended December 28, 2012 of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2013
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule.
Williamsville, New York
February 27, 2013
- 70 -
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Greatbatch, Inc.
Frisco, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Greatbatch, Inc. and subsidiary (the
"Company") as of December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders' equity for each of the
three years in the period ended December 28, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2012,
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in
our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2012,
based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2013
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Williamsville, New York
February 27, 2013
- 71 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share and per share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2.4 million in 2012 and $1.9 million in 2011
Inventories
Refundable income taxes
Deferred income taxes
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Amortizing intangible assets, net
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Goodwill
Deferred income taxes
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Income taxes payable
Deferred income taxes
Accrued expenses
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Deferred income taxes
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000
shares; no shares issued or outstanding in 2012 or 2011
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares;
23,731,570 shares issued and 23,711,838 shares outstanding in 2012
23,466,128 shares issued and 23,406,023 shares outstanding in 2011
Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost, 19,732 shares in 2012 and 60,105 shares in 2011
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Total stockholders’ equity
At
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
20,284 $
36,508
$
$
120,923
106,612
-
7,678
12,636
268,133
150,893
87,345
20,828
349,035
2,534
11,107
889,875 $
45,274 $
94
874
45,515
91,757
225,414
82,462
9,382
409,015
101,946
109,913
1,292
7,828
7,469
264,956
145,806
100,258
20,288
338,653
2,450
8,936
881,347
40,665
-
845
52,539
94,049
235,950
75,203
8,862
414,064
-
-
24
320,618
(452)
147,723
12,947
480,860
23
307,196
(1,387)
152,522
8,929
467,283
881,347
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
889,875 $
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 72 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands except per share data)
Sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Research, development and engineering costs, net
Electrochem litigation gain (Note 15)
Other operating expenses, net (Note 13)
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Interest expense
Interest income
(Gain) loss on cost and equity method investments, net
Other expense, net
Income before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax
Defined benefit plan liability adjustment, net of tax
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
$
$
$
$
646,177 $
444,528
201,649
80,992
52,490
-
42,346
175,828
25,821
18,055
(1)
106
931
6,730
11,529
(4,799) $
568,822 $
388,469
180,353
72,548
45,513
-
593
118,654
61,699
16,928
(21)
(4,232)
632
48,392
15,270
33,122 $
533,425
359,844
173,581
64,510
45,019
(9,500)
4,558
104,587
68,994
18,519
(10)
150
1,010
49,325
16,187
33,138
(0.20) $
(0.20) $
1.42 $
1.40 $
1.44
1.40
23,584
23,584
23,258
23,636
23,070
23,802
$
(4,799) $
33,122 $
33,138
1,905
428
1,685
4,018
(781) $
(704)
(271)
(566)
(1,541)
31,581 $
7,896
1,027
(601)
8,322
41,460
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 73 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2010
2012
(4,799) $
33,122 $
33,138
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Debt related amortization included in interest expense
Stock-based compensation
$
(Gain) loss on cost and equity method investments, net
Electrochem litigation gain
Electrochem litigation settlement payment
Other non-cash (gains) losses
Deferred income taxes
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquisitions:
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Income taxes payable
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from (purchase of) cost and equity method
investments, net
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Other investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments of long-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Issuance of common stock
Payment of debt issuance costs
Other financing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
46,368
12,557
10,904
106
-
-
10,788
5,733
(18,834)
(7,481)
1,253
5,757
1,459
1,020
64,831
(41,069)
396
(1,887)
(17,224)
(3)
(59,787)
(32,000)
10,000
1,263
-
(717)
(21,454)
36,306
11,389
12,082
(4,232)
-
-
(676)
8,776
(13,477)
(2,139)
(590)
4,236
3,678
1,446
89,921
(22,489)
212
10,315
(66,493)
(1,934)
(80,389)
(40,000)
45,000
2,401
(2,213)
(1,500)
3,688
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and
cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
186
405
(16,224)
36,508
20,284 $
13,625
22,883
36,508 $
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 74 -
35,767
10,680
6,884
150
(9,500)
(25,000)
743
15,419
10,922
7,406
2,111
(7,568)
(1,472)
(2,795)
76,885
(16,140)
2,537
-
-
(321)
(13,924)
(78,450)
-
659
-
(1,030)
(78,821)
879
(14,981)
37,864
22,883
Y
T
I
U
Q
E
’
S
R
E
D
L
O
H
K
C
O
T
S
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
.
C
N
I
,
H
C
T
A
B
T
A
E
R
G
l
a
t
o
T
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
O
'
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
T
k
c
o
t
S
y
t
i
u
q
E
)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E
t
n
u
o
m
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
n
I
-
d
i
a
P
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
t
n
u
o
m
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
4
8
8
,
6
4
2
7
,
9
7
3
)
5
5
6
(
)
4
8
5
(
2
2
3
,
8
8
3
1
,
3
3
7
3
0
,
7
3
7
9
,
1
9
2
8
,
6
2
4
)
7
3
1
(
2
2
1
,
3
3
)
1
4
5
,
1
(
7
8
6
9
1
0
,
9
3
8
2
,
7
6
4
)
1
4
1
(
3
9
7
,
4
)
9
9
7
,
4
(
8
1
0
,
4
$
8
4
1
,
2
$
2
6
2
,
6
8
$
)
5
3
6
(
$
)
3
3
(
6
2
9
,
1
9
2
$
3
2
$
0
9
1
,
3
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
2
3
,
8
0
7
4
,
0
1
)
1
4
5
,
1
(
9
2
9
,
8
-
-
-
-
-
8
1
0
,
4
-
-
-
-
8
3
1
,
3
3
-
-
4
8
8
,
6
)
4
3
8
(
)
0
3
(
9
7
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
)
4
8
5
(
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
2
1
,
3
3
-
2
8
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
7
3
0
,
7
1
9
8
,
1
-
-
)
7
3
1
(
-
-
-
-
-
0
0
4
,
9
1
1
)
9
6
4
,
1
(
)
3
6
(
5
0
4
,
8
9
2
3
2
-
9
2
1
-
-
-
-
7
4
1
9
1
3
,
3
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
)
9
9
7
,
4
(
-
4
2
-
-
-
1
1
9
-
1
-
9
3
-
-
3
6
6
9
1
0
,
9
)
1
4
1
(
1
8
8
,
3
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
3
0
1
-
3
6
1
-
-
2
2
5
,
2
5
1
)
7
8
3
,
1
(
)
0
6
(
6
9
1
,
7
0
3
3
2
6
6
4
,
3
2
s
t
i
n
u
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
d
n
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
,
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
m
o
r
f
y
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
t
e
n
,
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
o
l
a
t
o
T
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
s
t
i
n
u
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
d
n
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
s
n
a
l
p
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
t
e
N
,
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
m
o
r
f
y
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
0
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
A
s
t
i
n
u
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
d
n
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
s
n
a
l
p
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
t
e
N
,
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
m
o
r
f
y
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
n
a
l
P
)
k
(
1
0
4
o
t
d
e
t
u
b
i
r
t
n
o
c
s
e
r
a
h
S
t
e
n
,
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
o
l
a
t
o
T
s
s
o
l
t
e
N
t
e
n
,
s
s
o
l
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
o
l
a
t
o
T
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
1
1
0
2
,
0
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
A
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
i
(
r
e
d
n
u
)
d
e
r
i
u
q
c
a
(
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
t
e
N
s
n
a
l
p
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
0
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
t
A
0
6
8
,
0
8
4
$
7
4
9
,
2
1
$
3
2
7
,
7
4
1
$
)
2
5
4
(
$
)
0
2
(
8
1
6
,
0
2
3
$
4
2
$
2
3
7
,
3
2
2
1
0
2
,
8
2
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
A
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
e
s
e
h
t
f
o
t
r
a
p
l
a
r
g
e
t
n
i
n
a
e
r
a
s
e
t
o
n
g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a
e
h
T
-
5
7
-
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Greatbatch, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Greatbatch Ltd. (collectively, the ―Company‖ or
―Greatbatch‖). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Nature of Operations – The Company operates its business in two reportable segments –
Implantable Medical and Electrochem Solutions (―Electrochem‖). The Company’s customers
include large multi-national original equipment manufacturers (―OEMs‖). The Implantable Medical
segment is comprised of our Greatbatch Medical and QiG Group brands and designs and
manufactures medical devices and components for the cardiac, neuromodulation, vascular and
orthopaedic markets. The Implantable Medical segment offers complete medical devices including
design, development, manufacturing, regulatory submission and supporting worldwide distribution,
which is facilitated through the QiG Group and leverages the component technology of Greatbatch
Medical. The devices designed and developed by the QiG Group are manufactured by Greatbatch
Medical. The Implantable Medical segment also offers value-added assembly and design
engineering services for its component products.
Electrochem designs, manufactures and distributes primary and rechargeable batteries, and battery
packs for demanding applications in the portable medical, energy, environmental monitoring and
security markets among others.
Fiscal Year End – The Company utilizes a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the
Friday nearest December 31st. Fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 ended on December 28, 2012,
December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 all
contained fifty-two weeks.
Fair Value Measurements – Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability (i.e. the ―exit price‖) in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Accounting Standards Codification (―ASC‖) establishes a
hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and
minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when
available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company.
Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information
available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability
of inputs as follows:
Level 1 — Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
Company has the ability to access. Level 1 valuations do not entail a significant degree of judgment.
Level 2 — Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical instruments in markets that are not active or by model-based
techniques in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.
- 76 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Level 3 — Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are significant to the overall fair value
measurement. The degree of judgment in determining fair value is greatest for Level 3 valuations.
The availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including,
the type of asset/liability, whether the asset/liability is established in the marketplace, and other
characteristics particular to the valuation. To the extent that a valuation is based on models or inputs
that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more
judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the
fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather
than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available,
assumptions are required to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date. Note 18 ―Fair Value Measurements‖ contains additional
information on assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid, short-
term investments with maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less. The carrying
amount of cash and cash equivalents approximated their fair value as of December 28, 2012 and
December 30, 2011 based upon the short-term nature of these instruments.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. A significant portion of the
Company’s sales are to four customers, all in the medical device industry, and, as such, the
Company is directly affected by the condition of those customers and that industry. However, the
credit risk associated with trade receivables is partially mitigated due to the stability of those
customers. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers. Note 19 ―Business
Segment, Geographic and Concentration Risk Information‖ contains information on sales and
accounts receivable for these customers. The Company maintains cash deposits with major banks,
which from time to time may exceed insured limits. The Company performs on-going credit
evaluations of its banks.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – The Company provides credit, in the normal course of business,
to its customers in the form of trade receivables. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a
customer’s financial condition and collateral is not required. The Company maintains an allowance
for those customer receivables that it does not expect to collect. The Company accrues its estimated
losses from uncollectable accounts receivable to the allowance based upon recent historical
experience, the length of time the receivable has been outstanding and other specific information as
it becomes available. Provisions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are charged to current
operating expenses. Actual losses are charged against this allowance when incurred. The carrying
amount of trade receivables approximated their fair value as of December 28, 2012 based upon the
short-term nature of these assets.
- 77 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in first-out
method, or market. Write-downs for excess, obsolete or expired inventory are based primarily on
how long the inventory has been held as well as our estimates of forecasted net sales of that product.
A significant change in the timing or level of demand for our products may result in recording
additional write-downs for excess, obsolete or expired inventory in the future. Note 4 ―Inventories‖
contains additional information on the Company’s inventory.
Property, Plant and Equipment (“PP&E”) – PP&E is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as
follows: buildings and building improvements 7-40 years; machinery and equipment 3-8 years;
office equipment 3-10 years; and leasehold improvements over the remaining lives of the
improvements or the lease term, if less. The cost of repairs and maintenance are expensed as
incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale of an asset, its cost and
related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is
recorded in operating income or expense. Note 6 ―Property, Plant and Equipment, Net‖ contains
additional information on the Company’s PP&E.
Business Combinations – The Company records its business combinations under the acquisition
method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the Company allocates the
purchase price of each acquisition to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
identifiable intangible assets is based upon detailed valuations that use various assumptions made by
management. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. All direct acquisition-related costs are expensed
as incurred.
In circumstances where an acquisition involves a contingent consideration arrangement, the Company
recognizes a liability equal to the fair value of the contingent payments it expects to make as of the
acquisition date. The Company re-measures this liability each reporting period and records changes
in the fair value through Other Operating Expenses, Net. Increases or decreases in the fair value of
the contingent consideration liability can result from changes in discount periods and rates, as well as
changes in the timing, amount of, or the likelihood of achieving the applicable contingent
consideration. See Note 18 ―Fair Value Measurements‖ for additional information. Note 2
―Acquisitions‖ contains additional information on the Company’s acquisitions.
Amortizing Intangible Assets – Amortizing intangible assets consists primarily of purchased
technology, patents and customer lists. The Company amortizes its definite-lived intangible assets
over their estimated useful lives utilizing an accelerated or straight-line method of amortization,
which approximates the projected distribution of cash flows used to fair value those intangible assets
at the time of acquisition. When the straight-line method of amortization is utilized, the estimated
useful life of the intangible asset is shortened to assure that recognition of amortization expense
corresponds with the distribution of expected cash flows. The amortization period for the Company’s
amortizing intangible assets are as follows: purchased technology and patents 5-15 years; customer
lists 7-20 years and other intangible assets 1-10 years. Note 7 ―Intangible Assets‖ contains additional
information on the Company’s amortizing intangible assets.
- 78 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets – The Company assesses the impairment of definite-lived long-lived
assets or asset groups when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not
be recoverable. Factors that are considered in deciding when to perform an impairment review include:
A significant decrease in the market price of the asset or asset group; A significant change in the extent
or manner in which a long-lived asset or asset group is being used or in its physical condition; A
significant change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived
asset (asset group), including an action or assessment by a regulator; An accumulation of costs
significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction; A current-
period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a
projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset or
asset group; or a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset or asset group will be
sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The
term more likely than not refers to a level of likelihood that is more than 50 percent.
Potential recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset or asset group to its
related total future undiscounted cash flows. If the carrying value is not recoverable, the asset or asset
group is considered to be impaired. Impairment is measured by comparing the asset or asset group’s
carrying amount to its fair value. When it is determined that useful lives of assets are shorter than
originally estimated, and no impairment is present, the rate of depreciation is accelerated in order to
fully depreciate the assets over their new shorter useful lives.
Goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets recorded are not amortized but are periodically
tested for impairment. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value
of its reporting units to their carrying amounts on the last day of each fiscal year, or more frequently
if certain events occur as described above. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its
carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the
goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair values for reporting units are
determined based on discounted cash flows and market multiples. Other indefinite lived intangible
assets are assessed for impairment on the last day of each fiscal year, or more frequently if certain
events occur as described above, by comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to its carrying
value. The fair value is determined by using the income approach. Note 7 ―Intangible Assets‖
contains additional information on the Company’s long-lived intangible assets.
Other Long-Term Assets – Other long-term assets includes deferred financing fees incurred in
connection with the Company’s issuance of its convertible subordinated notes and revolving line of
credit. These fees are amortized to Interest Expense using the effective interest method over the
period from the date of issuance to the put option date (if applicable) or the maturity date, whichever
is earlier. The amortization of deferred fees is included in Debt Related Amortization Included in
Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Note 9 ―Debt‖ contains additional
information on the Company’s deferred financing fees.
Other long-term assets also include investments in equity securities of entities that are not publicly
traded and which do not have readily determinable fair values. We account for investments in these
entities under the cost or equity method depending on the type of ownership interest, as well as the
Company’s ability to exercise influence over these entities. Equity method investments are initially
recorded at cost, and are subsequently adjusted to reflect the Company’s share of earnings or losses of
the investee. Cost method investments are recorded at cost. Each reporting period, management
- 79 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
evaluates these cost and equity method investments to determine if there are any events or
circumstances that are likely to have a significant effect on the fair value of the investment.
Examples of such impairment indicators include, but are not limited to: a recent sale or offering of
similar shares of the investment at a price below the Company’s cost basis; a significant deterioration
in earnings performance; a significant change in the regulatory, economic or technological
environment of the investee; or a significant doubt about an investee’s ability to continue as a going
concern. If an impairment indicator is identified, management will estimate the fair value of the
investment and compare it to its carrying value. The estimation of fair value considers all available
financial information related to the investee, including, but not limited to, valuations based on recent
third-party equity investments in the investee. If the fair value of the investment is less than its
carrying value, the investment is impaired and a determination as to whether the impairment is other-
than-temporary is made. Impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary unless the Company has
the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period sufficient for a market recovery up to the
carrying value of the investment. Further, evidence must indicate that the carrying value of the
investment is recoverable within a reasonable period. For other-than-temporary impairments, an
impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s carrying value and its
fair value. The Company has determined that these investments are not considered variable interest
entities. The Company’s exposure related to these entities is limited to its recorded investment.
These investments are in start-up research and development companies whose fair value is highly
subjective in nature and subject to future fluctuations, which could be significant.
Income Taxes – The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared using the
asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes, which requires the recognition of
deferred income taxes for the expected future tax consequences of net operating losses, credits, and
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets
and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is
more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a more likely than not recognition
threshold. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to,
changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the
effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or
circumstances related to a tax position. These tax positions are evaluated on a quarterly basis. The
Company recognizes interest expense related to uncertain tax positions as Provision for Income
Taxes. Penalties, if incurred, are recognized as a component of Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses (―SG&A‖).
The Company and its subsidiary file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. State tax returns
are filed on a combined or separate basis depending on the applicable laws in the jurisdictions where
tax returns are filed. The Company also files foreign tax returns on a separate company basis in the
countries in which it operates. See Note 14 ―Income Taxes‖ for additional information.
Convertible Subordinated Notes (“CSN”) – For convertible debt instruments that may be settled in
cash upon conversion, the Company accounts for the liability and equity components of those
instruments in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest
cost is recognized in subsequent periods.
- 80 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Upon issuance, the Company determined the carrying amount of the liability component of CSN by
measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have the associated conversion option.
The carrying amount of the conversion option was then determined by deducting the fair value of the
liability component from the initial proceeds received from the issuance of CSN.
The carrying amount of the conversion option was recorded in Additional Paid-In Capital with an
offset to Long-Term Debt and is being amortized using the effective interest method over the period
from the date of issuance to the maturity date. Deferred financing fees incurred in connection with
the issuance of CSN, were allocated proportionally to the proceeds of the liability and equity
components. The deferred financing fees allocated to the debt component are being amortized using
the effective interest method over the period from the date of issuance to the maturity date. The
deferred financing fees allocated to the equity component were recorded as an offset to Additional
Paid-In Capital. The amortization of discount and deferred fees related to the Company’s convertible
debt instruments is included in Depreciation and Amortization in the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows. See Note 9 ―Debt‖ for additional information.
Derivative Financial Instruments – The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in
its consolidated financial statements at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
are recorded in earnings unless hedge accounting criteria are met. The Company designates its
interest rate swaps (See Note 9 ―Debt‖) and foreign currency contracts (See Note 15 ―Commitments
and Contingencies‖) entered into as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of the changes in fair
value of these cash flow hedges is recorded each period, net of tax, in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income until the related hedged transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion of the
changes in fair value of these cash flow hedges is recorded in earnings. In the event the hedged cash
flow for forecasted transactions does not occur, or it becomes probable that they will not occur, the
Company would reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to income
(expense) at that time. Cash flows related to these derivative financial instruments are included in
cash flows from operating activities.
Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.
This occurs when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or
determinable, the buyer is obligated to pay us (i.e., not contingent on a future event), the risk of loss is
transferred, there is no obligation of future performance, collectability is reasonably assured and the amount
of future returns can reasonably be estimated. With regards to the Company’s customers (including
distributors), those criteria are met at the time of shipment when title passes. The Company includes
shipping and handling fees billed to customers in Sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with
inbound and outbound freight are recorded in Cost of Sales. In certain instances the Company obtains
component parts for sub-assemblies from its customers that are included in the final product sold back
to the same customer. These amounts are excluded from Sales and Cost of Sales recognized by the
Company. The cost of these customer supplied component parts amounted to $32.6 million, $27.9
million and $29.9 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Product Warranties – The Company allows customers to return defective or damaged products for
credit, replacement, or exchange. The Company warrants that its products will meet customer
specifications and will be free from defects in materials and workmanship. The Company accrues its
estimated exposure to warranty claims, through Cost of Sales, based upon recent historical
- 81 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
experience and other specific information as it becomes available. Note 15 ―Commitments and
Contingencies‖ contains additional information on the Company’s product warranties.
Research, Development and Engineering Costs, Net (“RD&E”) – RD&E costs are expensed as
incurred. The primary costs are salary and benefits for personnel, material costs used in
development projects and subcontracting costs. Cost reimbursements for engineering services from
customers for whom the Company designs products are recorded as an offset to engineering costs
upon achieving development milestones specified in the contracts. These reimbursements do not
cover the complete cost of the development projects. Additionally, the technology developed under
these cost reimbursement projects is owned by the Company and is utilized for future products
developed for other customers.
In-process research and development (―IPR&D‖) represents research projects acquired in a business
combination which are expected to generate cash flows but have not yet reached technological
feasibility. The primary basis for determining the technological feasibility of these projects is
whether or not regulatory approval has been obtained. The Company classifies IPR&D acquired in a
business combination as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the completion or abandonment of
the associated projects. Upon completion, the Company would determine the useful life of the
IPR&D and begin amortizing the assets to reflect their use over their remaining lives. Upon
permanent abandonment, the remaining carrying amount of the associated IPR&D would be written-
off. The Company tests the IPR&D acquired for impairment at least annually, and more frequently
if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The impairment test
consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with their carrying amount. If the
carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the Company would record an impairment loss in an amount
equal to the excess.
Note 12 ―Research, Development and Engineering Costs, Net‖ and Note 7 ―Intangible Assets‖
contains additional information on the Company’s RD&E activities.
Stock-Based Compensation – The Company records compensation costs related to stock-based
awards granted to employees based upon their estimated fair value on the grant date. Compensation
cost for service-based awards is recognized ratably over the applicable vesting period.
Compensation cost for nonmarket-based performance awards is reassessed each period and
recognized based upon the probability that the performance targets will be achieved. Compensation
cost for market-based performance awards is expensed ratably over the applicable vesting period and
is recognized each period whether the performance metrics are achieved or not.
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock
options granted. For service-based and nonmarket-based performance restricted stock and restricted
stock unit awards, the fair market value of the award is determined based upon the closing value of
the Company’s stock price on the grant date. For market-based performance restricted stock unit
awards, the fair market value of the award is determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model,
which projects the value of the Company’s stock under numerous scenarios and determines the value
of the award based upon the present value of those projected outcomes.
- 82 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on the portion of the awards
that are ultimately expected to vest. The Company estimates pre-vesting forfeitures at the time of
grant by analyzing historical data and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. The total expense recognized over the vesting period will
only be for those awards that ultimately vest, excluding market and nonmarket performance award
considerations. Note 11 ―Stock-Based Compensation‖ contains additional information on the
Company’s stock-based compensation.
Foreign Currency Translation – The Company translates all assets and liabilities of its foreign
subsidiaries, where the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency, at the period-end exchange rate and
translates income and expenses at the average exchange rates in effect during the period. The net
effect of this translation is recorded in the consolidated financial statements as Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income. Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to
permanent investments in the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.
Net foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in Other Expense, Net and amounted
to a loss of $0.3 million for 2012, $0.1 million for 2011 and $0.9 million for 2010.
Defined Benefit Plans – The Company recognizes in its balance sheet as an asset or liability the
overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit plans provided to its employees located in
Mexico, Switzerland and France. This asset or liability is measured as the difference between the fair
value of plan assets and the benefit obligation of those plans. For these plans, the benefit obligation is
the projected benefit obligation, which is calculated based on actuarial computations of current and
future benefits for employees. Actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise
during the period, but are not included as components of net periodic benefit expense, are recognized as
a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Defined benefit expenses are charged to
Cost of Sales, SG&A and RD&E expenses as applicable. Note 10 ―Defined Benefit Plans‖ contains
additional information on these costs.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share (“EPS”) – Basic EPS is calculated by dividing Net Income (Loss) by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by
adjusting the weighted average number of shares outstanding for potential common shares, which
consist of stock options, unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units and contingently
convertible instruments.
Holders of the Company’s CSN may convert them into shares of the Company’s common stock
under certain circumstances – See Note 9 ―Debt.‖ The Company includes the effect of the
conversion of these convertible notes in the calculation of diluted EPS using the if-converted method
or the treasury method for instruments that may be settled in cash at the Company’s election and
which the Company has the ability and intent to settle them in cash, as long as the effect is dilutive.
For computation of EPS under conversion conditions, the number of diluted shares outstanding
increases by the amount of shares that are potentially convertible during that period. Also, Net
Income (Loss) is adjusted for the calculation to add back interest expense on the convertible notes as
well as unamortized discount and deferred financing fee amortization recorded during the period.
Note 16 ―Earnings (Loss) Per Share‖ contains additional information on the computation of the
Company’s EPS.
- 83 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comprehensive Income (Loss) – The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) as reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) includes net income
(loss), foreign currency translation adjustments, the net change in cash flow hedges, and defined
benefit plan liability adjustments. The Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss) and Note 17 ―Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income‖ contains additional
information on the computation of the Company’s comprehensive income (loss).
Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of sales and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements – In the normal course of business, Management
evaluates all new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(―FASB‖), Securities and Exchange Commission (―SEC‖), Emerging Issues Task Force (―EITF‖),
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (―AICPA‖) or other authoritative accounting
bodies to determine the potential impact they may have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements. Based upon this review, except as noted below, Management does not expect any of the
recently issued accounting pronouncements, which have not already been adopted, to have a material
impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
On February 5, 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (―ASU‖) 2013-02,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income. This ASU adds new disclosure requirements either in a single note or
parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified
from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (―AOCI‖) based on its source
and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. This ASU gives companies the
flexibility to present the information either in the notes or parenthetically on the face of the financial
statements provided that all of the required information is presented in a single location. This ASU is
effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012.
When adopted, this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements as it only changes the disclosures surrounding AOCI.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This ASU simplifies the guidance for
testing the decline in the realizable value (impairment) of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than
goodwill. The amendments allow an organization the option to first assess qualitative factors to
determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. An organization
electing to perform a qualitative assessment is no longer required to calculate the fair value of an
indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the organization determines, based on a qualitative
assessment, that it is ―more likely than not‖ that the asset is impaired. The amendments in this ASU
are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. When adopted, this ASU will not have a material
impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as it only impacts the timing of when
the Company is required to perform the two-step impairment tests of its indefinite-lived intangible
assets other than goodwill.
- 84 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 ―Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures
about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.‖ This ASU requires companies to provide information about
trading in financial instruments and related derivatives in expanded disclosures, creates new
disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity’s rights of offset and related arrangements
associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The disclosure requirements are
effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods
therein, with retrospective application required. When adopted, this ASU will not have a material
impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as it only changes the disclosures
surrounding the Company’s offsetting assets and liabilities.
2. ACQUISITIONS
NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc.
On February 16, 2012, the Company purchased all of the outstanding common stock of NeuroNexus
Technologies, Inc. (―NeuroNexus‖) headquartered in Ann Arbor, MI. NeuroNexus is an active
implantable medical device design firm specializing in developing and commercializing neural
interface technology, components and systems for neuroscience and clinical markets. NeuroNexus
has an extensive intellectual property portfolio, core technologies and capabilities to support the
development and manufacturing of neural interface devices across a wide range of applications
including neuromodulation, sensing, optical stimulation and targeted drug delivery.
This transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the
operating results of NeuroNexus have been included in the Company’s Implantable Medical segment
from the date of acquisition. For 2012, NeuroNexus added approximately $2.5 million to the
Company’s revenue and decreased the Company’s net loss by $0.2 million. The purchase price of
NeuroNexus consisted of cash payments of $11.7 million and potential future payments of up to an
additional $2 million. These future payments are contingent upon the achievement of certain
financial and development-based milestones and had an estimated fair value of $1.5 million as of the
acquisition date.
The cost of the acquisition was preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
from NeuroNexus based on their fair values as of the close of the acquisition, with the amount
exceeding the fair value of the net assets acquired being recorded as goodwill. The value assigned to
certain assets and liabilities are preliminary and are subject to adjustment as additional information is
obtained, including, but not limited to, the finalization of pre-acquisition tax positions. The
valuation is expected to be finalized during the first quarter of 2013. When the valuation is
finalized, any changes to the preliminary valuation of assets acquired or liabilities assumed may
result in material adjustments to the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, as well as goodwill.
- 85 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the NeuroNexus purchase price to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in thousands):
Assets acquired
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Amortizing intangible assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
$
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets acquired
Liabilities assumed
Current liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Total liabilities assumed
$
618
35
2,927
540
8,875
1,576
14,571
420
940
1,360
13,211
The preliminary fair values of the assets acquired were determined using one of three valuation
approaches: market, income and cost. The selection of a particular method for a given asset depended on
the reliability of available data and the nature of the asset, among other considerations.
The market approach estimates the value for a subject asset based on available market pricing for
comparable assets. The income approach estimates the value for a subject asset based on the present
value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset. The projected cash flows were discounted at a
required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the asset and the time value of money. The
projected cash flows for each asset considered multiple factors from the perspective of a marketplace
participant including revenue projections from existing customers, attrition trends, product life-cycle
assumptions, marginal tax rates and expected profit margins giving consideration to historical and
expected margins. The cost approach estimates the value for a subject asset based on the cost to replace
the asset and reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset, less an allowance for
loss in value due to depreciation or obsolescence, with specific consideration given to economic
obsolescence if indicated. These fair value measurement approaches are based on significant
unobservable inputs, including management estimates and assumptions.
Current assets and liabilities - The fair value of current assets and liabilities was assumed to approximate
their carrying value as of the acquisition date due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities.
- 86 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Intangible assets - The purchase price was preliminarily allocated to specific intangible assets as follows
(dollars in thousands):
Weighted
Average
Fair
Weighted
Estimated Average
Discount
Useful
Value Amortization
Assigned Period (Years) Life (Years)
Amortizing Intangible Assets
Technology and patents
Customer lists
$
1,058
1,869
2,927
6
7
7
10
15
13
Rate
14%
13%
13%
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
In-process research and development
540
N/A
12
26%
The weighted average amortization period is less than the estimated useful life due to the Company
using an accelerated amortization method, which approximates the projected cash flows used to
determine the fair value of those intangible assets.
Technology and patents - Technology and patents consists of technical processes, patented and
unpatented technology, manufacturing know-how, trade secrets and the understanding with respect to
products or processes that have been developed by NeuroNexus and that will be leveraged in current
and future products. The fair value of technology and patents acquired was determined utilizing the
relief from royalty method, a form of the income approach, with royalty rates that ranged from 2% to
6%. The estimated useful life of the technology and patents is based upon management’s estimate of
the product life cycle associated with technology and patents before they will be replaced by new
technologies.
Customer lists – Customer lists represent the estimated fair value of non-contractual customer
relationships NeuroNexus has as of the acquisition date. The primary customers of NeuroNexus
include numerous scientists and researchers from various geographic locations around the world.
These relationships were valued separately from goodwill at the amount which an independent third
party would be willing to pay for these relationships. The fair value of customer lists was
determined using the multi-period excess-earnings method, a form of the income approach. The
estimated useful life of the existing customer was based upon historical customer attrition as well as
management’s understanding of the industry and product life cycles.
IPR&D – IPR&D represents research projects which are expected to generate cash flows but have not
yet reached technological feasibility. The Company used the income approach to determine the fair
value of the IPR&D acquired. In arriving at the value of the IPR&D, management considered, among
other factors: the projects’ stage of completion; the complexity of the work to be completed as of the
acquisition date; the projected costs to complete the projects; the contribution of other acquired assets;
and the estimated useful life of the technology. The Company applied a market-participant risk-
adjusted discount rate to arrive at a present value as of the date of acquisition. The value assigned to
IPR&D related to the development of micro-electrodes for deep brain mapping and
- 87 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
electrocorticography, and is expected to be commercialized by 2014. For purposes of valuing the
IPR&D, the Company estimated total costs to complete the projects to be approximately $1.5 million.
If the projects are not successful or completed in a timely manner, the Company may not realize the
financial benefits expected for these projects.
Goodwill - The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. Various factors contributed to the
establishment of goodwill, including: the value of NeuroNexus’s highly trained assembled work
force and management team; the incremental value that NeuroNexus’s technology will bring to the
Company’s neuromodulation platform currently in development; and the expected revenue growth
over time that is attributable to increased market penetration from future products and customers.
The goodwill acquired in connection with the NeuroNexus acquisition was allocated to the
Implantable Medical business segment and is not deductible for tax purposes.
Micro Power Electronics, Inc.
On December 15, 2011, Electrochem acquired all of the outstanding common and preferred stock of
Micro Power Electronics, Inc. (―Micro Power‖) headquartered in Beaverton, OR. Micro Power is a
leading supplier of custom battery solutions, serving the portable medical, military and handheld
automatic identification and data collection markets. The aggregate purchase price consisted of the
amount paid to Micro Power shareholders ($57.6 million), payments to Micro Power’s creditors at
closing ($6.6 million) and certain Micro Power transaction-related expenses ($7.6 million). The
Company financed this acquisition with cash on hand and borrowed $45 million under its revolving
credit facility. As of December 30, 2011, the Company had accrued $5.7 million of Micro Power
transaction-related expenses, which were paid during 2012. During 2012, the Company completed
the valuation and made adjustments to the Micro Power opening balance sheet based upon the
receipt of information that was needed in order to complete the valuation of certain assets and
liabilities. As a result, the Company reduced the fair value recorded for the Micro Power amortizing
intangible assets acquired by $0.4 million and increased the amount of goodwill recorded by $0.4
million. The impact of these adjustments, individually and in the aggregate, was not considered
material and therefore has not been reflected as a retrospective adjustment of the historical financial
statements.
This transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the
operating results of Micro Power have been included in the Company’s Electrochem segment from
the date of acquisition and the cost of the acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the close of the acquisition, with the amount
exceeding the fair value of net assets acquired being recorded as goodwill. For 2011, the Micro
Power acquisition added approximately $2.5 million to revenue and was neutral to net income.
- 88 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes the allocation of the Micro Power purchase price to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in thousands):
Assets acquired
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Amortizing intangible assets
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets acquired
Liabilities assumed
Current liabilities
Long-term liabilities
Total liabilities assumed
$
$
25,620
1,650
28,914
31,891
94
88,169
13,679
2,688
16,367
71,802
Current assets and liabilities - The fair value of current assets (excluding inventory) and current liabilities
was assumed to approximate their carrying value as of the acquisition date due to the short-term nature of
these assets and liabilities. The fair value of in-process and finished goods inventory acquired was
estimated by applying a version of the market approach called the comparable sales method. This
approach estimates the fair value of the assets by calculating the potential revenue generated from selling
the inventory and subtracting from it the costs related to the completion and sale of that inventory and a
reasonable profit allowance. Based upon this methodology, the Company recorded the inventory
acquired at fair value resulting in an increase in inventory of $0.7 million.
Intangible assets – The purchase price was allocated to specific intangible assets as follows (dollars in
thousands):
Amortizing Intangible Assets
Technology and patents
Customer lists
Noncompete agreement
Trademarks and tradenames
Weighted
Average
Fair
Weighted
Estimated Average
Discount
Useful
Value Amortization
Assigned Period (Years) Life (Years)
4
$
5
4
2
4
8,051
19,569
915
379
28,914
10
14
8
2
13
$
Rate
14%
12%
14%
13%
13%
The weighted average amortization period is less than the estimated useful life due to the Company
using an accelerated amortization method, which approximates the projected cash flows used to
determine the fair value those intangible assets.
- 89 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Technology and patents - Technology and patents consists of technical processes, patented and
unpatented technology, manufacturing know-how, trade secrets and the understanding with respect to
products or processes that have been developed by Micro Power and that will be leveraged in current
and future products. The fair value of technology and patents acquired was determined utilizing the
relief from royalty method, a form of the income approach, with royalty rates that ranged from 2% to
4%. The estimated useful life of the technology and patents was based upon management’s estimate
of the product life cycle associated with technology and patents before they will be replaced by new
technologies.
Customer lists – Customer lists represent the estimated fair value of both the contractual and non-
contractual customer relationships Micro Power has as of the acquisition date. These relationships
were valued separately from goodwill at the amount which an independent third party would be
willing to pay for these relationships. The fair value of customer lists was determined using the
multi-period excess-earnings method, a form of the income approach. The estimated useful life of
the existing customer was based upon historical customer attrition as well as management’s
understanding of the industry and product life cycles.
Trademarks and tradenames – Trademarks and tradenames represent the estimated fair value of
corporate and product names acquired from Micro Power. These tradenames were valued separately
from goodwill at the amount which an independent third party would be willing to pay for use of these
names. The fair value of the trademarks and tradenames was determined by utilizing the relief from
royalty method, a form of the income approach, with a 0.5% royalty rate.
Goodwill - The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets
acquired was allocated to goodwill. Various factors contributed to the establishment of goodwill,
including: the value of Micro Power’s highly trained assembled work force and management team;
the expected revenue growth over time that is attributable to increased market penetration from
future products and customers; and the incremental value to the Company’s Electrochem business
from expanding and diversifying its revenues. The goodwill acquired in connection with the Micro
Power acquisition was allocated to the Electrochem business segment and is not deductible for tax
purposes.
- 90 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Pro Forma Results (Unaudited) - The following unaudited pro forma information presents the
consolidated results of operations of the Company, NeuroNexus and Micro Power as if those
acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of fiscal years 2011 (NeuroNexus) and 2010 (Micro
Power) (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year Ended
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
646,617 $
(4,973)
636,502
32,306
(0.21) $
(0.21) $
1.39
1.37
$
Sales
Net (loss) income
Earnings (loss) per share:
$
$
Basic
Diluted
The unaudited pro forma information presents the combined operating results of Greatbatch,
NeuroNexus and Micro Power, with the results prior to the acquisition date adjusted to include the pro
forma impact of the amortization of acquired intangible assets, the adjustment to interest expense
reflecting the amount borrowed in connection with the acquisitions at Greatbatch’s interest rate, and
the impact of income taxes on the pro forma adjustments utilizing the applicable statutory tax rate.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations are based
on the consolidated basic and diluted weighted average shares of Greatbatch. The unaudited pro forma
results are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect the realization of potential cost
savings, and any related integration costs. Certain costs savings may result from the acquisition;
however, there can be no assurance that these cost savings will be achieved. These pro forma results
do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have been obtained, or to be a projection of
results that may be obtained in the future.
3. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(in thousands)
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Common stock contributed to 401(k) Plan
Property, plant and equipment purchases
included in accounts payable
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
Income taxes
Acquisition of noncash assets
Liabilities assumed
- 91 -
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
$
4,793 $
- $
-
2,522
4,455
2,614
6,230
4,909
14,396
1,244
6,148
5,259
87,766
16,483
8,498
3,826
350
-
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. INVENTORIES
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
At
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
58,204 $
30,022
18,386
106,612 $
49,773
36,603
23,537
109,913
Raw materials
Work-in-process
Finished goods
Total
5. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Assets held for sale, which are included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets, is comprised of
the following (in thousands):
At
December 28, December 30,
Disposal
Group
Business
Segment
Asset
Wireless sensing
Inventory
Technology Wireless sensing
Swiss orthopaedic product line Implantable Medical
Inventory
Swiss orthopaedic product line Implantable Medical
PP&E
Technology Swiss orthopaedic product line Implantable Medical
$
Electrochem
Electrochem
$
2012
2011
288
655
2,552
1,471
476
5,442
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
During 2012, the Company transferred inventory and technology related to Electrochem’s wireless
sensing product line to held for sale. These assets are expected to be sold within the next year.
In connection with the sale of certain non-core Swiss orthopaedic product lines to an independent
third party in the first quarter of 2013, during 2012, the Company transferred certain inventory,
PP&E and technology to held for sale. Additionally, as the disposal group was considered a
business, $2.9 million of goodwill was allocated to the disposal group in the first quarter of 2013
when the transaction closed. In connection with the transfer of these orthopaedic product lines to
held for sale, the Company recognized a $3.6 million loss in Other Operating Expenses, Net in 2012
based upon the sales price to the third party. As this disposal group did not have cash flows that were
clearly distinguishable, both operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the
Company, they were not considered discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 205. See Note
13 ―Other Operating Expenses, Net.‖
- 92 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property, plant and equipment are comprised of the following (in thousands):
At
December 28, December 30,
2012
2011
$
Manufacturing machinery and equipment
Buildings and building improvements
Information technology hardware and software
Leasehold improvements
Furniture and fixtures
Land and land improvements
Construction work in process
Other
Accumulated depreciation
Total
$
150,344 $
87,357
29,823
20,520
13,414
12,499
15,441
676
330,074
(179,181)
150,893 $
149,136
75,229
33,881
17,426
11,282
11,075
13,302
993
312,324
(166,518)
145,806
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2010
2012
Depreciation expense
$
31,575 $
25,672 $
26,104
Construction work in process at December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 primarily relates to the
transfer of the Company’s orthopaedic operations performed at the Orvin and Corgemont,
Switzerland facilities to existing facilities located in Fort Wayne, IN and Tijuana, Mexico; the
expansion of the Company’s manufacturing infrastructure in order to support its medical device
strategy; and the relocation of the Company’s global headquarters to Frisco, Texas. See Note 13
―Other Operating Expenses, Net‖ for a description of the Company’s significant capital investment
projects.
- 93 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Amortizing intangible assets, net are comprised of the following (in thousands):
At December 28, 2012
Purchased technology and patents
Customer lists
$
Other
Total amortizing intangible assets
$
At December 30, 2011
Purchased technology and patents
Customer lists
$
Other
Total amortizing intangible assets
$
Gross
Carrying
Amount
95,576 $
68,257
4,434
168,267 $
Accumulated
Amortization
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Net
Carrying
Amount
(61,659) $
(18,929)
(4,341)
(84,929) $
1,932 $
1,270
805
4,007 $
35,849
50,598
898
87,345
97,324 $
66,388
5,174
168,886 $
(54,054) $
(14,009)
(4,019)
(72,082) $
842 $
1,807
805
3,454 $
44,112
54,186
1,960
100,258
Aggregate intangible asset amortization expense is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28,
December 30, December 31,
2012
2011
2010
Cost of sales
SG&A
RD&E
Total intangible asset amortization expense $
$
7,489 $
6,227
545
14,261 $
6,163 $
3,926
367
10,456 $
5,897
3,765
-
9,662
Estimated future intangible asset amortization expense based upon the current carrying
value is as follows (in thousands):
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Thereafter
Total estimated amortization expense
- 94 -
Estimated
Amortization
Expense
$
$
13,189
13,424
12,373
10,078
8,956
29,325
87,345
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During 2011, the Company made various asset purchases of technology and patents totaling $6.3
million, which is being amortized over a weighted average period of approximately 11 years. In
connection with these purchases, the Company recorded a $3.0 million contingent liability, which
will only be paid if certain sales targets for products that utilize that technology are achieved. This
contingent liability is currently classified in Other Long-Term Liabilities.
The change in indefinite-lived assets during 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
At December 30, 2011
$
Indefinite-lived assets acquired
$
At December 28, 2012
Trademarks
and
Tradenames
IPR&D
20,288 $
-
20,288 $
- $
540
540 $
Total
20,288
540
20,828
The change in goodwill during 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
At December 30, 2011
Goodwill acquired
Foreign currency translation
At December 28, 2012
Implantable
Medical
Electrochem
Total
$
$
297,232 $
8,875
1,094
307,201 $
41,421 $
413
-
41,834 $
338,653
9,288
1,094
349,035
As of December 28, 2012, no accumulated impairment loss has been recognized for the goodwill
allocated to the Company’s Implantable Medical or Electrochem segments.
8. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses are comprised of the following (in thousands):
At
December 28, December 30,
2012
2011
Salaries and benefits
Profit sharing and bonuses
Warranty
$
Swiss orthopaedic consolidation severance
Micro Power purchase price payable
Other
Total
$
- 95 -
12,704 $
12,488
2,626
9,567
-
8,130
45,515 $
13,618
19,971
2,013
-
5,690
11,247
52,539
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. DEBT
Long-term debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Revolving line of credit
2.25% convertible subordinated notes
Unamortized discount
Total long-term debt
At
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
33,000
197,782
(5,368)
225,414
$
$
55,000
197,782
(16,832)
235,950
Revolving Line of Credit – The Company has a revolving credit facility (the ―Credit Facility‖),
which provides a $400 million secured revolving credit facility, and can be increased by $200
million upon the Company’s request and approval by a majority of the lenders. The Credit Facility
also contains a $15 million letter of credit subfacility and a $15 million swingline subfacility. The
Credit Facility has a maturity date of June 24, 2016; provided, however, if CSN are not repaid in
full, modified or refinanced before March 1, 2013, the maturity date of the Credit Facility is March
1, 2013. On February 20, 2013, the Company redeemed all outstanding CSN, which was funded with
availability under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility is secured by the Company’s non-realty assets including cash, accounts
receivable and inventories. Interest rates under the Credit Facility are, at the Company’s option
either at: (i) the prime rate plus the applicable margin, which ranges between 0.0% and 1.0%, based
on the Company’s total leverage ratio or (ii) the applicable LIBOR rate plus the applicable margin,
which ranges between 1.5% and 3.0%, based on the Company’s total leverage ratio. Loans under the
swingline subfacility will bear interest at the prime rate plus the applicable margin, which ranges
between 0.0% and 1.0%, based on the Company’s total leverage ratio. The Company is also required
to pay a commitment fee which, varies between 0.175% and 0.25% depending on the Company’s
total leverage ratio.
The Credit Facility contains limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, liens and licensing of
intellectual property, investments and certain payments. The Credit Facility permits the Company to
engage in the following activities up to an aggregate amount of $250 million: 1) engage in permitted
acquisitions in the aggregate not to exceed $250 million; 2) make other investments in the aggregate
not to exceed $60 million; 3) make stock repurchases not to exceed $60 million in the aggregate; and
4) retire up to $198 million of CSN. At any time that the total leverage ratio of the Company for the
two most recently ended fiscal quarters is less than 2.75 to 1.0, the Company may make an election
to reset each of the amounts specified above. Additionally, these limitations can be waived upon the
Company’s request and approval of a majority of the lenders. As of December 28, 2012, the
Company had available to it 100% of the above limits as the Company reset these limits during 2012,
except for the aggregate limit and other investments limit which are now $248 million and $58
million, respectively.
The Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain a rolling four quarter ratio of adjusted
EBITDA to interest expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0, and a total leverage ratio of not greater than 4.0 to
1.0. The calculation of adjusted EBITDA and total leverage ratio excludes non-cash charges,
- 96 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring expenses or losses, non-cash stock-based compensation, and
non-recurring expenses or charges incurred in connection with permitted acquisitions. As of
December 28, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
The Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the
continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may declare the outstanding advances
and all other obligations under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Facility as of December 28, 2012,
was 2.07%. As of December 28, 2012, the Company had $367 million of borrowing capacity
available under the Credit Facility. This amount may vary from period to period based upon the debt
levels of the Company as well as the level of EBITDA, which impacts the covenant calculations as
described above.
Interest Rate Swaps – From time to time, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements in
order to hedge against potential changes in cash flows on the outstanding debt on the Credit Facility.
The receive variable leg of the interest rate swaps and the variable rate paid on the debt have the
same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and resets and pays interest on the same date. In
2008, the Company entered into three receive floating-pay fixed interest rate swaps indexed to the
six-month LIBOR rate, in order to hedge against potential changes in cash flows on the Company’s
outstanding debt, which was also indexed to the six-month LIBOR rate. As of December 28, 2012,
none of these interest rate swaps remain outstanding. During 2012, the Company entered into a
three-year $150 million interest rate swap, which amortizes $50 million per year and will be effective
in February 2013. For the outstanding debt being hedged, the Company intends to continue electing
the one-month LIBOR as the benchmark interest rate. Information regarding the Company’s
outstanding interest rate swap as of December 28, 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Instrument Hedge
Type of Notional
Amount
Start
Date
End
Date
Pay
Fixed
Rate
Fair
Value
Current
Receive
Floating December 28,
Rate
2012
Balance
Sheet
Location
Interest rate
swap
Cash flow $ 150,000
Feb-13 Feb-16 0.573% $ N/A
$
(638)
Other
Long-Term
Liabilities
The estimated fair value of the interest rate swap agreement represents the amount the Company
expects to receive (pay) to terminate the contract. The Company accounts for its interest rate swaps
as cash flow hedges. No portion of the change in fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps
during 2012, 2011 or 2010 was considered ineffective. The amount recorded as Interest Expense in
2012, 2011 and 2010 related to the Company’s interest rate swaps was $0.0 million, $0.4 million and
$1.7 million, respectively.
Convertible Subordinated Notes – In March 2007, the Company completed a private placement of
$197.8 million of convertible subordinated notes (―CSN‖) at a 5% discount. CSN bear interest at
2.25% per annum, payable semi-annually, are due on June 15, 2013. The Company redeemed all
outstanding CSN on February 20, 2013, which was funded with availability under the Credit
- 97 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Facility. As such, CSN is classified as long-term in the December 28, 2012 Consolidated Balance
Sheet in accordance with ASC 470.
The holders of CSN were able to convert the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at a
conversion price of $34.70 per share, which was equivalent to a conversion ratio of 28.8219 shares
per $1,000 of principal. The conversion price and the conversion ratio adjusted automatically upon
certain changes to the Company’s capitalization. The fair value of CSN as of December 28, 2012
was approximately $197.8 million and is based on recent sales prices.
The effective interest rate of CSN, which takes into consideration the amortization of the discount
and deferred fees related to the issuance of these notes, is 8.5%. The discount on CSN was being
amortized to the call date utilizing the effective interest method. As of December 28, 2012, the
carrying amount of the discount related to the CSN conversion option was $4.6 million. As of
December 28, 2012, the if-converted value of the CSN notes does not exceed their principal amount
as the Company’s closing stock price of $22.89 per share did not exceed the conversion price of
CSN.
The contractual interest and discount amortization for CSN were as follows (in thousands):
Contractual interest
Discount amortization
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30, December 31,
2011
2010
$
4,450 $
11,464
4,450 $
10,320
4,450
9,657
CSN were convertible at the option of the holders at such time as: (i) the closing price of the
Company’s common stock exceeds 150% of the conversion price of the notes for 20 out of 30
consecutive trading days; (ii) the trading price per $1,000 of principal is less than 98% of the product
of the closing sale price of common stock for each day during any five consecutive trading day
period and the conversion rate per $1,000 of principal; (iii) CSN have been called for redemption;
(iv) the Company distributes to all holders of common stock rights or warrants entitling them to
purchase additional shares of common stock at less than the average closing price of common stock
for the ten trading days immediately preceding the announcement of the distribution; (v) the
Company distributes to all holders of common stock any form of dividend which has a per share
value exceeding 5% of the price of the common stock on the day prior to such date of distribution;
(vi) the Company effects a consolidation, merger, share exchange or sale of assets pursuant to which
its common stock is converted to cash or other property; (vii) the occurrence of the period beginning
60 days prior to but excluding June 15, 2013; and (viii) certain fundamental changes, as defined in
the indenture governing the notes, occur or are approved by the Board of Directors.
Conversions in connection with corporate transactions that constitute a fundamental change required
the Company to pay a premium make-whole amount, based upon a predetermined table as set forth
in the indenture agreement, whereby the conversion ratio on the notes would be increased by up to
6.3 shares per $1,000 of principal. The premium make-whole amount would have been paid in
shares of common stock upon any such conversion, subject to the net share settlement feature of the
notes described below.
- 98 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CSN contained a net share settlement feature that required the Company to pay cash for each $1,000
of principal to be converted. Any amounts in excess of $1,000 would be settled in shares of the
Company’s common stock, or at the Company’s option, cash. The Company had a one-time
irrevocable election to pay the holders in shares of its common stock, which it did not exercise.
CSN were redeemable by the Company at any time on or after June 20, 2012, or at the option of a
holder upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes, as defined in the indenture, affecting the
Company. CSN were subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior indebtedness and
effectively subordinated to all debts and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.
Deferred Financing Fees - The change in deferred financing fees is as follows (in thousands):
At December 31, 2010
Financing costs deferred
Write-off during the period
Amortization during the period
At December 30, 2011
Amortization during the period
At December 28, 2012
10. DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
$
$
2,005
2,213
(51)
(1,018)
3,149
(1,093)
2,056
Savings Plan – The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan, which covers
substantially all of its U.S. based employees. The plan provides for the deferral of employee
compensation under Section 401(k) and a discretionary Company match. In 2012, 2011, and 2010,
this match was 35% per dollar of participant deferral, up to 6% of the total compensation for each
participant. Net costs related to this defined contribution plan were $2.0 million in 2012, $1.6
million in 2011, and $1.5 million in 2010.
In addition to the above, under the terms of the 401(k) plan document there is an annual
discretionary defined contribution of up to 4% of each employee’s eligible compensation based upon
the achievement of certain performance targets. This amount is contributed to the 401(k) plan in the
form of Company stock. Compensation cost recognized related to the defined contribution plan was
$1.9 million and $5.1 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. No discretionary contribution was
made for fiscal year 2010 as the Company did not achieve the applicable performance targets for that
year. As of December 28, 2012, the 401(k) Plan held 653,455 shares of Company stock.
Education Assistance Program – The Company reimburses tuition, textbooks and laboratory fees
for college or other job related programs for all of its U.S. based employees. The Company also
reimburses college tuition for the dependent children of certain full-time U.S. based employees hired
prior to 2012, which vests on a straight-line basis over ten years, up to the applicable local state
university tuition rate. For certain employees and executives, the dependent children benefit is not
limited. Minimum academic achievement is required in order to receive reimbursement under both
programs. Aggregate expenses under the programs were $2.2 million, $1.5 million and $1.3 million
in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
- 99 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Defined Benefit Plans – The Company is required to provide its employees located in Switzerland,
Mexico, and France certain statutorily mandated defined benefits. Under these plans, benefits accrue
to employees based upon years of service, position, age and compensation. The defined benefit
pension plan provided to the Company’s employees located in Switzerland is a funded contributory
plan while the plans that provide benefits to the Company’s employees located in Mexico and France
are unfunded and noncontributory. The liability and corresponding expense related to these benefit
plans is based on actuarial computations of current and future benefits for employees.
During 2012, the Company transferred most major functions performed at its facilities in Switzerland
into other existing facilities. As a result, the Company curtailed its defined benefit plan provided to
employees at those Swiss facilities during 2012. The Company has estimated that a net curtailment
gain will be recognized as a result of this curtailment. In accordance with ASC 715, this gain will be
recognized as the related employees are terminated. Additionally, as nearly all of the Swiss pension
liability is expected to be paid off in the next year, the Company moved all Swiss pension plan assets
into cash accounts during 2012. Swiss Plan assets are expected to be sufficient to cover plan liabilities.
Information relating to the funding position of the Company’s defined benefit plans as of the plans
measurement date of December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
- 100 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Year Ended
December 28, December 30,
2012
2011
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Prior service cost and plan amendments
Plan participants' contribution
Actuarial loss
Benefits paid
Settlements/curtailments
Foreign currency translation
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
Change in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Employer contributions
Plan participants' contributions
Actual gain (loss) on plan assets
Benefits paid
Settlements
Foreign currency translation
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan
$
17,053 $
1,115
409
-
976
958
229
(4,934)
409
16,215
11,484
1,050
976
644
229
(2,424)
310
12,269
assets at end of year
$
3,946 $
Defined benefit liability classified as other current liabilities $
Defined benefit liability classified as long-term liabilities
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
$
$
23 $
3,923 $
14,606 $
15,961
1,127
483
(457)
999
393
(1,396)
-
(57)
17,053
11,314
1,041
999
(443)
(1,380)
-
(47)
11,484
5,569
21
5,548
14,962
- 101 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income are as follows (in
thousands):
Net loss occurring during the year
Amortization of losses
Prior service cost
Amortization of prior service cost
Foreign currency translation
Pre-tax adjustment
Taxes
Net (gain) loss
Year Ended
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
740 $
(3,064)
342
(10)
294
(1,698)
13
(1,685) $
1,306
(59)
(459)
(137)
(5)
646
(80)
566
The amortization of amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income expected to be
recognized as components of net periodic benefit expense during 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
Amortization of net prior service credit
Amortization of net loss
$
31
7
Net pension cost is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on assets
Recognized net actuarial loss
Net pension cost
Year Ended
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
1,115 $
409
(425)
222
1,321 $
1,127
483
(470)
200
1,340
The weighted-average rates used in the actuarial valuations were as follows:
Projected Benefit Obligation
December 28, December 30,
Net Pension Cost
Discount rate
Salary growth
Expected rate of return on assets
2012
2.1%
2.4%
0.0%
2011
2.5%
2.3%
3.5%
- 102 -
2012 2011 2010
3.0%
2.5%
4.0%
2.9%
2.5%
3.8%
2.5%
2.3%
3.5%
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The discount rate used is based on the yields of Switzerland AA bonds with a duration matching the
duration of the liabilities plus approximately 50 basis points to reflect the risk of investing in
corporate bonds. The expected rate of return on plan assets reflects earnings expectations on
existing plan assets, which as a result of the Swiss pension plan curtailment, were all in cash as of
the end of the current plan year.
Plan assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
Cash
Total
December 28,
2012
$
$
12,269 $
12,269 $
December 30,
2011
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
12,269 $
12,269 $
- $
- $
-
-
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
179 $
179 $
- $
Cash
Equity securities:
U.S. companies
International companies
Emerging markets
Fixed income:
Government & government agencies
Corporate
Real-estate
Other
Total
$
1,019
2,155
415
4,057
1,860
1,064
735
11,484 $
1,019
2,155
415
4,057
1,860
-
735
10,420 $
-
-
-
-
-
1,064
-
1,064 $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The fair value of Level 1 plan assets are obtained by reference to the last quoted price of the
identical security on the active market which it trades. The fair value of Level 2 plan assets are
obtained from quoted market prices in inactive markets or valuation models with observable market
data inputs to estimate fair value. These observable market data inputs include benchmark yields,
reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference
data.
- 103 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Estimated benefit payments over the next ten years are as follows (in thousands):
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018-2022
$
8,813
272
289
307
364
1,738
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The components and classification of stock-based compensation expense were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Stock options
Restricted stock and units
401(k) stock contribution
Total stock-based compensation expense
Cost of sales
Selling, general and administrative
Research, development and engineering
Total stock-based compensation expense
$
$
$
$
2,786 $
6,233
1,885
10,904 $
2,620 $
7,684
600
10,904 $
2,511 $
4,526
5,045
12,082 $
4,184 $
6,630
1,268
12,082 $
2,617
4,267
-
6,884
509
5,982
393
6,884
During 2010, the Company recorded $0.7 million of stock-based compensation expense related to
the accelerated vesting of equity awards issued to the Company’s former Senior Vice President -
Orthopaedics, who died during the year.
Summary of Plans
The Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan, 2002 Restricted Stock Plan and Non-Employee Directors
Plan have been frozen to any new award issuances. Stock option and restricted stock awards remain
outstanding under these plans.
The Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (―2005 Plan‖), as amended, authorizes the issuance of up
to 2,450,000 shares of equity incentive awards including nonqualified and incentive stock options,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and stock appreciation rights subject to the
terms of the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan limits the amount of restricted stock, restricted stock units
and stock bonuses that may be awarded in the aggregate to 850,000 shares of the 2,450,000 shares
authorized by the 2005 Plan.
- 104 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company’s 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (―2009 Plan‖) authorizes the issuance of up to 1,350,000
shares of equity incentive awards including nonqualified and incentive stock options, restricted
stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and stock appreciation rights subject to the terms of the
2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan limits the amount of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock
bonuses that may be awarded in the aggregate to 200,000 shares of the 1,350,000 shares authorized.
The Company’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (―2011 Plan‖) authorizes the issuance of up to 1,000,000
shares of equity incentive awards including nonqualified and incentive stock options, restricted
stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and stock appreciation rights, subject to the terms of the
2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan does not limit the amount of restricted stock, restricted stock units or stock
bonuses that may be awarded.
As of December 28, 2012, there were 508,233, 789,262 and 59,426 shares available for future grants
under the 2011 Plan, 2009 Plan and 2005 Plan, respectively. Due to plan sub-limits, of the shares
available for grant, only 731 shares and 54,307 shares may be awarded under the 2009 Plan and the
2005 Plan, respectively, in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units or stock bonuses.
Stock Options
Stock options granted generally vest over a three or four year period, expire 10 years from the date
of grant, and are granted at exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair value of the Company’s
common stock on the date of grant. Performance-based stock options only vest if certain
performance metrics are achieved. The performance metrics generally cover a three-year
performance period beginning in the year of grant and include the achievement of revenue, adjusted
operating earnings and adjusted operating cash flow targets. In 2010, the Company began issuing all
performance stock-based awards in the form of restricted stock units.
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock
options. Management is required to make certain assumptions with respect to selected model inputs.
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock over the most recent
period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the stock options. The expected life of
stock options, which represents the period of time that the stock options are expected to be
outstanding, is based on historical data. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s
history and expectation of future dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a period commensurate with the estimated
expected life. If factors change and result in different assumptions, the stock option expense that the
Company records for future grants may differ significantly from what the Company recorded in the
current period. Stock-based compensation expense is only recorded for those awards that are
expected to vest. Pre-vesting forfeiture estimates for determining appropriate stock-based
compensation expense are estimated at the time of grant based on historical experience. Revisions
are made to those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimated
forfeitures.
- 105 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The weighted-average fair value and assumptions used are as follows:
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Weighted average grant date fair value $
Risk-free interest rate
Expected volatility
Expected life (in years)
Expected dividend yield
Annual prevesting forfeiture rate
8.20 $
0.83%
40%
5.3
0%
9%
9.37 $
2.02%
40%
5.3
0%
9%
8.24
2.62%
40%
5.4
0%
9%
The following table summarizes time-vested stock option activity:
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 30, 2011
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Number of
Time-Vested
Stock
Options
1,362,123 $
243,155
(34,196)
(107,526)
1,463,556
306,449
(84,237)
(126,997)
1,558,771
395,978
(52,683)
(126,219)
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Life
Value
(In Years)
(In Millions)
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
23.94
20.57
19.26
24.43
23.46
23.98
21.41
26.47
23.42
22.19
20.77
24.21
Outstanding at December 28, 2012
1,775,847 $
23.17
Expected to vest at December 28, 2012
1,725,786 $
23.22
Exercisable at December 28, 2012
1,458,885 $
23.32
6.0 $
6.0 $
5.4 $
2.2
2.1
1.9
- 106 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes performance-vested stock option activity:
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Life
Value
(In Years)
(In Millions)
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at December 30, 2011
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Number of
Performance-
Vested Stock
Options
1,001,984 $
(257,461)
744,523
(26,478)
(239,681)
478,364
(7,657)
(185,782)
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
24.48
26.81
23.68
22.53
22.29
24.44
22.04
26.35
Outstanding at December 28, 2012
284,925 $
23.26
Expected to vest at December 28, 2012
284,925 $
23.26
Exercisable at December 28, 2012
284,925 $
23.26
4.3 $
4.3 $
4.3 $
0.1
0.1
0.1
Intrinsic value is calculated for in-the-money options (exercise price less than market price)
outstanding and/or exercisable as the difference between the market price of the Company’s
common shares as of December 28, 2012 ($22.89) and the weighted average exercise price of the
underlying stock options, multiplied by the number of options outstanding and/or exercisable. As of
December 28, 2012, $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock
options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years.
Shares are distributed from the Company’s authorized but unissued reserve upon the exercise of
stock options or treasury stock if available. The Company does not intend to purchase treasury
shares to fund the future exercises of stock options.
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options are credited to common stock at par value and the excess
is credited to additional paid-in capital. A portion of the options outstanding qualify as incentive
stock options (―ISO‖) for income tax purposes. As such, a tax benefit is not recorded at the time the
compensation cost related to the stock options is recorded for book purposes due to the fact that an
ISO does not ordinarily result in a tax benefit unless there is a disqualifying disposition. Stock
option grants of non-qualified stock options result in the creation of a deferred tax asset, which is a
temporary difference, until the time that the option is exercised.
- 107 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table provides certain information relating to the exercise of stock options (in
thousands):
Intrinsic value
Cash received
Tax expense realized
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
148 $
501 $
1,263
(132)
2,401
(146)
112
659
(41)
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
Time-vested restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted typically vest in equal annual
installments over a four year period. The fair value of time-based as well as nonmarket-based
performance restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards is equal to the fair value of the
Company’s stock on the date of grant. The following table summarizes time-vested restricted stock
and unit activity:
Nonvested at January 1, 2010
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 2010
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 30, 2011
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 28, 2012
Time-Vested
Activity
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
160,998 $
124,747
(147,434)
(14,925)
123,386
31,625
(80,825)
(4,244)
69,942
92,265
(74,901)
(7,037)
80,269 $
24.82
21.11
23.05
23.45
22.57
23.49
22.80
22.98
22.69
23.49
22.83
22.56
23.48
Performance-vested restricted stock granted prior to 2010 vests upon the achievement of certain
annual diluted EPS targets by the Company, or the seventh anniversary date of the award.
The performance-based restricted stock units granted only vest if certain market-based performance
metrics are achieved. The amount of shares that ultimately vest range from 0 shares to 781,446
shares based upon the total shareholder return of the Company relative to the Company’s
compensation peer group over a three year performance period beginning in the year of grant. The
fair value of the restricted stock units was determined by utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model,
which projects the value of Greatbatch stock versus the peer group under numerous scenarios and
- 108 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
determines the value of the award based upon the present value of these projected outcomes. The
following table summarizes performance-vested restricted stock and stock unit activity related to the
Company’s plans:
Nonvested at January 1, 2010
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 2010
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 30, 2011
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 28, 2012
Performance-
Vested
Activity
24,000 $
289,654
(21,558)
(8,299)
283,797
279,415
(6,600)
(26,869)
529,743
332,918
(15,500)
(64,715)
782,446 $
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
23.07
14.43
15.12
14.56
15.10
18.21
17.94
15.85
16.68
15.30
24.64
15.72
16.02
The realized tax benefit (expense) from the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units was
($0.02 million), $0.008 million and $0.01 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of
December 28, 2012, there was $6.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the
restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of approximately 2 years. The fair value of shares vested in 2012, 2011
and 2010 was $1.5 million, $1.9 million and $4.1 million, respectively.
12. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COSTS, NET
Research, Development and Engineering Costs, Net are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Research and development costs
Engineering costs
Less: cost reimbursements
Total research, development and
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
24,071 $
38,777
(10,358)
19,014 $
35,472
(8,973)
17,378
34,208
(6,567)
engineering costs, net
$
52,490 $
45,513 $
45,019
- 109 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES, NET
Other Operating Expenses, Net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2010
2012
Orthopaedic facility optimization
Medical device facility optimization
ERP system upgrade
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations
Integration costs
Asset dispositions, severance and other
$
$
32,482 $
1,525
5,041
-
1,460
1,838
42,346 $
425 $
-
-
-
-
168
593 $
225
-
-
1,348
42
2,943
4,558
Orthopaedic facility optimization. In 2010, the Company began updating its Indianapolis, IN
facility to streamline operations, consolidate two buildings, increase capacity, further expand
capabilities and reduce dependence on outside suppliers. This initiative was completed in 2011.
In 2011, the Company began construction on an orthopaedic manufacturing facility in Fort Wayne,
IN and transferred manufacturing operations being performed at its Columbia City, IN location into
this new facility. This initiative was completed in 2012.
During 2012, the Company transferred most major functions performed at its facilities in Orvin and
Corgemont, Switzerland into existing facilities in Fort Wayne, IN and Tijuana, Mexico. In connection
with this consolidation, in 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to sell certain non-core Swiss
orthopaedic product lines to an independent third party including inventory, PP&E and technology on
hand related to these product lines. This transaction closed in the first quarter of 2013. See Note 5
―Assets Held for Sale.‖
The total capital investment expected to be incurred for these initiatives is between $25 million and $35
million, of which $20.9 million has been expended to date. Total expense expected to be incurred for
these initiatives is between $30 million and $36 million, of which $33.1 million has been incurred to
date. All expenses have been and will be recorded within the Implantable Medical segment and are
expected to include the following:
Severance and retention - $9 million - $11 million;
Accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs - $13 million - $15 million;
Other - $8 million - $10 million.
All expenses are cash expenditures, except accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs.
- 110 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The change in accrued liabilities related to the Orthopaedic facility optimizations is as follows (in
thousands):
Severance
and
Retention
Accelerated
Depreciation/
Asset Write-
offs
Other
Total
At December 30, 2011
Restructuring charges
Write-offs
Cash payments
At December 28, 2012
$
$
- $
10,049
-
(482)
9,567 $
- $
- $
14,759
(14,759)
-
- $
7,674
-
(7,674)
- $
-
32,482
(14,759)
(8,156)
9,567
Medical device facility optimization. Near the end of 2011, the Company initiated plans to upgrade
and expand its manufacturing infrastructure in order to support its medical device strategy. This
includes the transfer of certain product lines to create additional capacity for the manufacture of medical
devices, expansion of two existing facilities, as well as the purchase of equipment to enable the
production of medical devices. These initiatives are expected to be completed over the next two to three
years. Total capital investment under these initiatives is expected to be between $15 million to $20
million of which approximately $9.9 million has been expended to date. Total expenses expected to be
incurred on these projects is between $2 million to $3 million of which $1.5 million has been incurred
to date. All expenses have been and will be recorded within the Implantable Medical segment and are
expected to include the following:
Production inefficiencies, moving and revalidation: $0.5 million - $1 million;
Personnel: $1 million - $1.5 million; and
Other: $1.0 million.
The change in accrued liabilities related to the medical device facility optimization is as follows (in
thousands):
Production
Inefficiencies,
Moving and
Revalidation
$
$
-
652
(652)
-
At December 30, 2011
Restructuring charges
Cash payments
At December 28, 2012
Personnel
$
Other
Total
$
$
-
243
(243)
-
$
$
-
1,525
(1,525)
-
-
630
(630)
-
$
ERP system upgrade. In 2011, the Company initiated plans to upgrade its existing global ERP system.
This initiative is expected to be completed over the next year. Total capital investment under this
initiative is expected to be between $4 million to $5 million of which approximately $3.0 million has
been expended to date. Total expenses expected to be incurred on this initiative is between $5 million
- 111 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
to $7 million of which $5.0 million has been incurred to date. All expenses are cash expenditures,
except accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs. Expenses related to this initiative are recorded
within the corporate cost center and include the following:
Training and consulting costs: $3 million - $4.5 million; and
Accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs: $2 million – $2.5 million.
The change in accrued liabilities related to the ERP system upgrade is as follows (in thousands):
Training &
Consulting
Costs
At December 30, 2011
$
Charges
Write-offs
Cash payments
At December 28, 2012
$
-
2,875
-
(2,706)
169
Accelerated
Depreciation/
Asset Write-offs
$
-
2,166
(2,166)
-
-
$
$
$
Total
-
5,041
(2,166)
(2,706)
169
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations. From 2007 to 2010, the Company completed
the following facility shutdowns and consolidation initiatives:
Consolidated its Electrochem manufacturing facilities in Canton, MA, Teterboro, NJ and Suzhou,
China, into a newly constructed facility in Raynham, MA;
Consolidated its corporate offices in Clarence, NY into its technology center also in Clarence,
NY;
Reorganized and consolidated various general and administrative and research and development
functions throughout the organization in order to optimize those resources;
Consolidated its Orchard Park, NY (Electrochem manufacturing), Exton, PA (Orthopaedic
corporate office) and Saignelegier, Switzerland (Orthopaedic manufacturing) facilities into
existing facilities that had excess capacity; and
Consolidated its manufacturing operations in Blaine, MN into its Plymouth, MN facility.
The total expenses incurred for these facility shutdowns and consolidations was $17.3 million and
included the following:
Severance and retention - $4.4 million;
Production inefficiencies, moving and revalidation - $5.2 million;
Accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs - $5.3 million;
Personnel - $0.7 million; and
Other - $1.7 million.
All categories of costs are considered to be cash expenditures, except accelerated depreciation and
asset write-offs. For 2010, costs relating to these initiatives of $0.3 million and $1.0 million were
included in the Implantable Medical and Electrochem business segments, respectively.
- 112 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As a result of these consolidation initiatives, one Implantable Medical and one Electrochem facility
were sold in 2010, which resulted in net cash proceeds of $2.4 million. For 2010, write-downs of $1.0
million were recorded relating to these facilities and were included in Other Operating Expenses, Net.
Integration costs. During 2012, the Company incurred costs related to the integration of Micro
Power and NeuroNexus. These expenses were primarily for retention bonuses, travel cost in
connection with integration efforts, training and severance, which will not be required or incurred
after the integrations are completed. During 2010, the Company incurred costs related to the
integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and 2008.
Asset dispositions, severance and other. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded
write-downs in connection with various asset disposals, net of insurance proceeds received, if any.
Additionally, during 2012 the Company incurred $1.2 million of costs related to the relocation of its
global headquarters to Frisco, Texas. During 2011, the Company incurred $0.6 million of due
diligence related costs in connection with its purchase of Micro Power. During 2010, we realigned
resources within Implantable Medical, which included the elimination of certain positions globally.
Severance charges associated with this realignment were $2.3 million.
14. INCOME TAXES
The U.S. and international components of income before provision for income taxes were as follows
(in thousands):
U.S.
International
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
$
36,057 $
(29,327)
6,730 $
43,610 $
4,782
48,392 $
46,217
3,108
49,325
- 113 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The provision for income taxes was comprised of the following (in thousands):
Current:
Federal
State
International
Deferred:
Federal
State
International
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
4,747 $
381
668
5,796
6,615
175
(1,057)
5,733
5,150 $
(40)
1,384
6,494
8,028
599
149
8,776
(671)
179
1,260
768
15,409
300
(290)
15,419
$
11,529 $
15,270 $
16,187
The provision for income taxes differs from the U.S. statutory rate due to the following:
Statutory rate
Change in tax rate - loss of Swiss tax
holiday
Federal tax credits
Foreign rate differential
Uncertain tax positions
State taxes, net of federal benefit
Valuation allowance
Other
Effective tax rate
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
December 31,
2011
2010
35.0 %
35.0 %
35.0 %
25.6
-
50.7
(10.1)
4.9
67.6
(2.4)
171.3 %
-
(3.7)
0.3
(1.3)
0.3
0.1
0.9
31.6 %
-
(2.6)
(0.8)
(1.3)
(0.3)
1.7
1.1
32.8 %
- 114 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following (in thousands):
Tax credits
Net operating loss carryforwards
Inventories
Accrued expenses
Stock-based compensation
Other
Gross deferred tax assets
Less valuation allowance
Net deferred tax assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Convertible subordinated notes
Gross deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax liability
Presented as follows:
Current deferred tax asset
Current deferred tax liability
Noncurrent deferred tax asset
Noncurrent deferred tax liability
At
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
$
6,884 $
14,637
3,911
4,129
8,502
465
38,528
(12,768)
25,760
(2,648)
(59,774)
(36,462)
(98,884)
(73,124) $
7,678 $
(874)
2,534
(82,462)
7,362
11,106
4,441
2,961
6,378
1,052
33,300
(7,775)
25,525
(2,572)
(54,874)
(33,849)
(91,295)
(65,770)
7,828
(845)
2,450
(75,203)
$
(73,124) $
(65,770)
As of December 28, 2012, the Company has the following carryforwards available:
Jurisdiction
U.S.
International
State
U.S. and State
State
Tax
Attribute
Net Operating Loss
Net Operating Loss
Net Operating Loss
R&D Tax Credit
Investment Tax Credit
$
Amount
(in millions)
11.2 (1)
38.1 (1)
29.5 (1)
1.7 (1)
5.4
Begin to
Expire
2025
2013
Various
Various
Various
(1) The utilization of certain net operating losses and credits is subject to an annual limitation under
Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
Certain federal tax credits reported on filed income tax returns included uncertain tax positions taken
in prior years. Due to the application of the accounting for uncertain tax positions, the actual tax
- 115 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
attributes are larger than the tax credits for which a deferred tax asset is recognized for financial
statement purposes.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers, within each taxing
jurisdiction, whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected
future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the
consideration of the weight of both positive and negative evidence, management has determined that
a portion of the deferred tax assets as of December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 related to
certain state investment tax credits and net operating losses will not be realized.
The Company files annual income tax returns in the U.S., various state and local jurisdictions, and in
various foreign jurisdictions. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for
which the Company has unrecognized tax benefits, is examined and finally settled. While it is often
difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax
position, the Company believes that its unrecognized tax benefits reflect the most probable outcome.
The Company adjusts these unrecognized tax benefits, as well as the related interest, in light of
changing facts and circumstances. The resolution of a matter could be recognized as an adjustment
to the Provision for Income Taxes and the effective tax rate in the period of resolution.
Below is a summary of changes to the unrecognized tax benefit (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Balance, beginning of year
Additions based upon tax positions related to the
current year
Additions recorded as part of business
combinations
Additions related to prior period tax positions,
net
Reductions relating to settlements with tax
authorities
Reductions as a result of a lapse of applicable
statute of limitations
Balance, end of year
$
1,580 $
2,756 $
3,418
-
-
210
(522)
300
260
-
-
300
-
222
-
$
(298)
970 $
(1,736)
1,580 $
(1,184)
2,756
The tax years that remain open and subject to tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. An
audit of the consolidated federal 2009 and 2010 tax returns were completed during 2012. It is
reasonably possible that a reduction of approximately $0.1 million of the balance of unrecognized
tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations
and potential audit settlements. As of December 28, 2012, approximately $0.8 million of
unrecognized tax benefits would favorably impact the effective tax rate (net of federal impact on
state issues), if recognized.
- 116 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the ―Act‖) was signed into law on January 2, 2013.
The Act retroactively restored several expired business tax provisions, including the Section 41
research and experimentation credit that had expired on December 31, 2011. Under the American
Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the section 41 research tax credit is extended for two years
retroactively from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. As the Act was signed into law on
January 2, 2013, Greatbatch will record a benefit for the section 41 research tax credits earned in
2012 as a discrete item in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and credits earned in 2013 will be
recognized through the fiscal 2013 effective rate.
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation – On December 21, 2012, Electrochem and several other unaffiliated parties were named
as defendants in a personal injury and wrongful death action filed in the 113th Judicial District Court
of Harris County, Texas. The complaint seeks damages alleging marketing defects and failure to
warn, negligence and gross negligence relating to a product Electrochem manufactured and sold to a
customer, one of the other named defendants, which, in turn, incorporated the Electrochem product
into its own product which it sold to its customer, another named defendant. The cost of defense in
this matter is the responsibility of Electrochem’s customer. Electrochem also has product liability
insurance coverage. Electrochem has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend the
matter. Given the early stages of this action, the amount of loss or range of possible loss cannot be
reasonably estimated at this time.
As previously reported, in 2002, a former Electrochem customer, Input/Output, Inc., now known as
ION Geophysical Corporation (―Input/Output‖), commenced an action against the Company. After
trial in September 2009, a jury found in favor of Input/Output on fraud, unfair trade practices and
breach of contract claims. The final judgment in the matter included an award of prejudgment
interest bringing the total judgment to approximately $33 million. During 2009, the Company
accrued $34.5 million in connection with the Electrochem Litigation. The Company’s post-trial
motion for a new trial was denied, and the Company appealed the judgment to the Louisiana Court
of Appeal. In December 2010, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Input/Output.
Under terms of this agreement, Input/Output released the Company of any liability in connection
with the jury verdict and in return for that release, the Company paid Input/Output $25 million. In
the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a gain for the remaining $9.5 million of the
previous accrual which was recognized within the Electrochem segment.
The Company is a party to various other legal actions arising in the normal course of business.
While the Company does not expect that the ultimate resolution of any of these pending actions will
have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows,
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties
and there can be no assurance that any pending legal action, which the Company currently believes
to be immaterial, does not become material in the future.
License agreements – The Company is a party to various license agreements for technology that is
utilized in certain of its products. The most significant of these agreements are the licenses for basic
technology used in the production of wet tantalum capacitors, filtered feedthroughs and MRI
compatible lead systems. Expenses related to license agreements were $3.1 million, $2.8 million
and $2.5 million, for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included in Cost of Sales.
- 117 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Product Warranties – The Company generally warrants that its products will meet customer
specifications and will be free from defects in materials and workmanship.
The change in product warranty liability was comprised of the following (in thousands):
Beginning balance
Warranty reserves acquired
Additions to warranty reserve
Warranty claims paid
Foreign currency effect
Ending balance
Year Ended
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
2,013
-
1,681
(1,068)
-
2,626
$
$
2,313
210
375
(887)
2
2,013
Operating Leases – The Company is a party to various operating lease agreements for buildings,
equipment and software. The Company primarily leases buildings, which accounts for the majority of
the future lease payments. Lease expense includes the effect of escalation clauses and leasehold
improvement incentives which are accounted for ratably over the lease term.
Operating lease expense was as follows (in thousands):
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
Operating lease expense
$
4,024
$
2,704
$
3,114
Minimum future estimated annual operating lease expense are as follows (in thousands):
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Thereafter
Total estimated operating lease expense
$
$
4,601
4,368
3,766
3,176
1,203
1,930
19,044
Self-Insured Medical Plan – The Company self-funds the medical insurance coverage provided to
its U.S. based employees. For 2012, the risk to the Company was limited through the use of stop
loss insurance, which had an annual maximum aggregate loss of $13.5 million with a maximum
benefit of $1.0 million. For 2013, the Company has specific stop loss coverage per associate for
claims in the year exceeding $225 thousand per associate with no annual maximum aggregate stop
loss coverage. As of December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011, the Company had $1.4 million
and $1.6 million accrued related to the self-insurance of its medical plan, respectively. This accrual
- 118 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
is recorded in Accrued Expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and is primarily based upon
claim history.
Purchase Commitments – Contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as
agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company and that specify all significant
terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price
provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Company’s purchase orders are
normally based on its current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by its vendors within short time
horizons. The Company enters into blanket orders with vendors that have preferred pricing and
terms, however these orders are normally cancelable by us without penalty. As of December 28,
2012, the total contractual obligation related to such expenditures is approximately $24.7 million and
will primarily be financed by existing cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, or
the Credit Facility. The Company also enters into contracts for outsourced services; however, the
obligations under these contracts were not significant and the contracts generally contain clauses
allowing for cancellation without significant penalty.
Foreign Currency Contracts – The Company has entered into forward contracts to purchase Mexican
pesos in order to hedge the risk of peso-denominated payments associated with the operations at its
Tijuana, Mexico facility.
The impact to the Company's results of operations from these forward contracts was as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Reduction in Cost of Sales
Ineffective portion of change in fair value
$
$
79
-
556 $
-
483
-
Information regarding the Company's outstanding foreign currency contracts as of December 28,
2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Aggregate
Type of Notional
Amount
Start End
Date Date
$/Peso
Fair
Value
Instrument Hedge
FX Contract Cash flow
FX Contract Cash flow
6,000 Jan-13 Dec-13 0.0727
6,000 Jan-13 Dec-13 0.0693
$
Balance Sheet
Location
222 Current Assets
535 Current Assets
757
Workers’ Compensation Trust – The Company was a member of a group self-insurance trust that
provided workers’ compensation benefits to employees of the Company in Western New York (the
―Trust‖). Under the Trust agreement, each participating organization has joint and several liability
for Trust obligations if the assets of the Trust are not sufficient to cover those obligations. During
2011, the Company was notified by the Trust of its intentions to cease operations at the end of 2011
and was assessed $0.6 million as an estimate of its pro-rata share of future costs related to the Trust.
This amount was accrued and paid in 2011. Based on actual experience, the Company could receive
- 119 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
a refund or be assessed additional contributions for workers’ compensation claims. In 2012, the
Company utilized traditional insurance to provide workers’ compensation benefits.
16. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table illustrates the calculation of Basic and Diluted EPS (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
Numerator for basic EPS:
Net income (loss)
Effect of dilutive securities:
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
(4,799) $
33,122 $
33,138
Interest expense and deferred financing
fees on convertible notes, net of tax
Numerator for diluted EPS
$
Denominator for basic EPS:
Weighted average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive securities:
Convertible notes
Stock options, restricted stock and
restricted stock units
Denominator for diluted EPS
Basic EPS
Diluted EPS
$
$
-
(4,799) $
-
33,122 $
241
33,379
23,584
23,258
23,070
-
-
23,584
(0.20) $
(0.20) $
-
347
378
23,636
1.42 $
1.40 $
385
23,802
1.44
1.40
The diluted weighted average share calculations do not include the following securities, which are
not dilutive to the EPS calculations or the performance criteria have not been met:
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2010
2012
Time-vested stock options, restricted stock and
restricted stock units
2,142,000
909,000
1,061,000
Performance-vested stock options and restricted
stock units
781,000
649,000
609,000
For all periods presented, no shares related to CSN were included in the diluted EPS calculations as the
average share price of the Company’s common stock for those periods did not exceed CSN’s conversion
price per share.
- 120 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
17. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is comprised of the following (in thousands):
At December 30, 2011
$
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
Realized gain on cash flow hedges
Net defined benefit plan
liability adjustments
Foreign currency translation gain
At December 28, 2012
Defined
Benefit
Plan
Liability
(2,660) $
-
-
Cash
Flow
Hedges
(538) $
737
(79)
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
Total
Pre-Tax
Amount Tax
11,526 $
-
-
8,328 $
737
(79)
601 $
(258)
28
Net-of-
Tax
Amount
8,929
479
(51)
1,698
-
$
(962) $
-
-
120 $
-
1,905
13,431 $
1,698
1,905
12,589 $
(13)
-
358 $
1,685
1,905
12,947
18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Fair value measurement standards apply to certain financial assets and liabilities that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis (each reporting period). For the Company, these financial assets and
liabilities include its derivative instruments and accrued contingent consideration. The Company
does not have any nonfinancial assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis.
Foreign currency contracts - The fair value of foreign currency contracts are determined through the
use of cash flow models that utilize observable market data inputs to estimate fair value. These
observable market data inputs include foreign exchange rate and credit spread curves. In addition to
the above, the Company received fair value estimates from the foreign currency contract
counterparty to verify the reasonableness of the Company’s estimates. The Company’s foreign
currency contracts are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the
Company’s foreign currency contracts will be realized as Cost of Sales as the inventory, which the
contracts are hedging the cash flows to produce, is sold, of which approximately $0.8 million is
expected to be realized within the next twelve months.
Interest rate swap - The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap outstanding at December 28,
2012 was determined through the use of a cash flow model that utilizes observable market data
inputs. These observable market data inputs include LIBOR, swap rates, and credit spread curves. In
addition to the above, the Company received a fair value estimate from the interest rate swap
counterparty to verify the reasonableness of the Company’s estimate. This fair value calculation was
categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Accrued contingent consideration – The fair value of accrued contingent consideration recorded by
the Company represents the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration the Company expects
to pay to the former shareholders of NeuroNexus based upon the achievement of certain financial and
development-based milestones. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability was estimated
- 121 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
by discounting to present value, contingent payments expected to be made. The Company used risk-
adjusted discount rates to derive the fair value of the expected obligations as of the acquisition date,
which the Company believes are representative of market participant assumptions. Changes in
accrued contingent consideration were as follows (in thousands):
At December 30, 2011
Contingent consideration liability recorded
Fair value adjustments
At December 28, 2012
$
$
-
1,500
30
1,530
The recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of the Company's contingent consideration liability
include the following significant unobservable inputs (dollars in thousands):
Contingent
Consideration
Liability
Fair Value at
December 28,
2012
Valuation
Technique
Financial milestones
$
870
Discounted cash flow
Unobservable Inputs
12%
Discount rate
Projected year of
payment
2014
Development milestones
$
660
Discounted cash flow
Discount rate
20%
Projected year of
payment
2015
The following tables provide information regarding assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
At
December 28,
2012
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
757 $
- $
757 $
-
Description
Assets
Foreign currency contracts (Note
15)
Liabilities
Accrued contingent consideration $
Interest rate swap
1,530 $
638
- $
-
- $
638
1,530
-
- 122 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
At
December 30,
2011
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
538 $
- $
538 $
-
Description
Liabilities
Foreign currency contracts
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Fair value standards also apply to certain assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. A summary of the valuation methodologies for assets and liabilities measured
on a nonrecurring basis is as follows:
Cost and equity method investments - The Company holds investments in equity and other securities
that are accounted for as either cost or equity method investments, which are classified as Other
Assets. The total carrying value of these investments is reviewed quarterly for changes in
circumstance or the occurrence of events that suggest the Company’s investment may not be
recoverable. The fair value of cost or equity method investments is not adjusted if there are no
identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a material effect on the fair value of the
investments. Gains and losses realized on cost and equity method investments are recorded in Other
Expense, Net, unless separately stated. The aggregate recorded amount of cost and equity method
investments at December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 was $9.1 million and $5.7 million,
respectively.
During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized impairment charges related to its cost and
equity method investments of $0.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The fair
value of these investments was determined by reference to recent sales data of similar shares to
independent parties in an inactive market. This fair value calculation was categorized in Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy. On January 5, 2011, the Company sold its cost method investment in
IntElect Medical, Inc. (―IntElect‖) in conjunction with Boston Scientific’s acquisition of IntElect.
This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.5 million in the first quarter of 2011 and an
additional $0.4 million during the third quarter of 2012. Cost and equity method investment
impairment charges, gains and losses are included in (Gain) Loss on Cost and Equity Method
Investments, Net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Long-lived assets – The Company reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets to be held and
used for potential impairment whenever certain indicators are present as described in Note 1 ―Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies.‖ In connection with the sale of certain non-core Swiss orthopaedic
product lines, during 2012, the Company transferred long-lived assets to held for sale. Refer to Note 5
―Assets Held for Sale‖ for further discussion. The fair value of this asset group was determined based
upon the sales price for the long-lived assets and was categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
- 123 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table provides information regarding assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
At
December 28,
2012
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
4,499 $
86
- $
-
4,499 $
86
-
-
Description
Assets
Assets Held for Sale - Swiss
orthopaedic
disposal group (Note 5)
Cost method investment
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
Convertible subordinated notes - The fair value of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes
disclosed in Note 9 ―Debt‖ was determined based upon recent third-party transactions for the
Company’s notes in an inactive market. The Company’s convertible subordinated notes are valued
for disclosure purposes utilizing Level 2 measurements of the fair value hierarchy.
Pension plan assets – The fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets disclosed in Note 10
―Defined Benefit Plans‖ are determined based upon quoted market prices in active markets, quoted
market prices in inactive markets or multidimensional relational models with observable market data
inputs to estimate fair value. These observable market data inputs include benchmark yields, reported
trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data.
The Company’s pension plan assets are categorized in Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
- 124 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
19. BUSINESS SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND CONCENTRATION RISK INFORMATION
The Company operates its business in two reportable segments – Implantable Medical and
Electrochem. The Implantable Medical segment is comprised of the Greatbatch Medical and QiG
Group brands and designs and manufactures medical devices and components for the cardiac,
neuromodulation, vascular and orthopaedic markets. The Implantable Medical segment offers
complete medical devices including design, development, manufacturing, regulatory submission and
supporting worldwide distribution, which is facilitated through the QiG Group and leverages the
component technology of Greatbatch Medical. The devices designed and developed by the QiG
Group are manufactured by Greatbatch Medical. The Implantable Medical segment also offers
value-added assembly and design engineering services for its component products.
Electrochem designs, manufactures and distributes customized primary (non-rechargeable) and
secondary (rechargeable) batteries, and battery packs for demanding applications in the portable
medical, energy, environmental monitoring and security markets among others. Portable medical
product line sales were primarily obtained through the Micro Power acquisition.
The Company defines segment income from operations as sales less cost of sales including
amortization and expenses attributable to segment-specific selling, general, administrative, research,
development, engineering and other operating activities. Segment income also includes a portion of
non-segment specific selling, general, and administrative expenses based on allocations appropriate
to the expense categories. The remaining unallocated operating and other expenses are primarily
administrative corporate headquarter expenses and capital costs that are not allocated to reportable
segments. Transactions between the two segments are not significant.
An analysis and reconciliation of the Company’s business segment, product line and geographic
information to the respective information in the Consolidated Financial Statements follows. Sales by
geographic area are presented by allocating sales from external customers based on where the
products are shipped to (in thousands):
Sales:
Implantable Medical
Cardiac/Neuromodulation
Vascular
Orthopaedic
Total Implantable Medical
Electrochem
Portable Medical
Energy/Environmental
Other
Total Electrochem
Total sales
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
$
309,124 $
51,980
122,061
483,165
81,659
67,046
14,307
163,012
646,177 $
- 125 -
303,690 $
45,098
140,277
489,065
9,609
58,934
11,214
79,757
568,822 $
303,521
38,000
118,748
460,269
8,432
54,668
10,056
73,156
533,425
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Segment income from operations:
Implantable Medical
Electrochem
Total segment income from operations
$
Unallocated operating expenses
Operating income as reported
Unallocated other expense
Income before provision for income taxes as
reported
$
24,908 $
21,631
46,539
(20,718)
25,821
(19,091)
62,461 $
14,965
77,426
(15,727)
61,699
(13,307)
62,477
22,195
84,672
(15,678)
68,994
(19,669)
6,730 $
48,392 $
49,325
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Depreciation and Amortization:
Implantable Medical
Electrochem
$
32,928 $
7,522
28,571 $
2,965
Total depreciation and amortization included
in segment income from operations
Unallocated depreciation and amortization
Total depreciation and amortization
$
40,450
18,475
58,925 $
31,536
16,159
47,695 $
28,117
2,660
30,777
15,670
46,447
Year Ended
December 28, December 30, December 31,
2011
2012
2010
Expenditures for tangible long-lived assets,
excluding acquisitions:
Implantable Medical
Electrochem
Total reportable segments
Unallocated long-lived tangible assets
Total expenditures
$
$
32,130 $
4,327
36,457
4,709
41,166 $
22,509 $
1,072
23,581
741
24,322 $
15,088
763
15,851
1,120
16,971
- 126 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Identifiable assets:
Implantable Medical
Electrochem
Total reportable segments
Unallocated assets
Total assets
Sales by geographic area:
United States
Non-Domestic locations:
Puerto Rico
Belgium
United Kingdom & Ireland
Rest of world
Total sales
Long-lived tangible assets:
United States
Rest of world
Total
At
December 28, December 30,
2012
2011
$
$
670,135 $
167,505
837,640
52,235
889,875 $
653,628
161,904
815,532
65,815
881,347
December 28,
2012
Year Ended
December 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
$
330,537 $
256,987 $
243,827
105,731
58,043
43,938
107,928
646,177 $
At
$
94,059
62,978
54,029
100,769
568,822 $
88,369
58,014
56,903
86,312
533,425
December 28,
2012
December 30,
2011
$
$
123,104 $
27,789
150,893 $
113,693
32,113
145,806
A significant portion of the Company’s sales and accounts receivable were to four customers as
follows:
Sales
Year Ended
Accounts Receivable
At
Customer A
Customer B
Customer C
Customer D
December 28, December 30, December 31, December 28, December 30,
2010
21%
19%
12%
10%
62%
2012
19%
16%
11%
6%
52%
2011
19%
19%
13%
8%
59%
2012
7%
21%
6%
6%
40%
2011
7%
23%
6%
6%
42%
- 127 -
GREATBATCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
20. QUARTERLY SALES AND EARNINGS DATA - UNAUDITED
$
$
2012
Sales
Gross profit
Net income (loss)
EPS - basic
EPS - diluted
2011
Sales
Gross profit
Net income
EPS - basic
EPS - diluted
4th Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
1st Qtr.
(in thousands, except per share data)
159,186 $
51,874
(5,556)
(0.23)
(0.23)
161,340 $
50,954
(7,561)
(0.32)
(0.32)
166,548 $
51,933
3,851
0.16
0.16
141,746 $
44,672
5,639
0.24
0.24
131,718 $
41,907
6,989
0.30
0.30
146,524 $
46,604
8,550
0.37
0.36
159,103
46,888
4,467
0.19
0.19
148,834
47,170
11,944
0.51
0.51
Net income in the third and fourth quarters of 2012 was impacted by charges incurred in connection
with the consolidation of the Company’s Swiss orthopaedic facilities. See Note 13 ―Other Operating
Expenses, Net.‖
Net income in the 2011 first quarter includes the impact of the gain on sale of a cost method
investment. See Note 18 ―Fair Value Measurements.‖
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
- 128 -
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appears in Part II, Item 8,
―Financial Statements and Supplementary Data‖ of this report and is incorporated into this Item 9A by
reference.
a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing, summarization and reporting of information
in our reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of December 28, 2012.
These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that
material information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is made known to our management,
including these officers, by our employees, and that this information is recorded, processed,
summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Based on their evaluation, as of December 28, 2012, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective.
b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
We acquired the following subsidiary during 2012:
NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc.
We believe that the internal controls and procedures of the above mentioned subsidiary are reasonably
likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. We are currently in the process
of incorporating the internal controls and procedures of this subsidiary into our internal controls over
financial reporting.
The Company has begun to extend its Section 404 compliance program under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (the ―Act‖) and the applicable rules and regulations under such Act to include this subsidiary.
However, the Company has excluded the subsidiary listed above from management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2012, as permitted by the
guidance issued by the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This subsidiary represented approximately 3% and 2% of net and total assets, respectively, and 0.4% of
revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 28,
2012. The Company will report on its assessment of the internal controls of its combined operations
within the time period provided by the Act and the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and regulations concerning business combinations.
Other than as described above, there were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting during our last fiscal quarter to which this Annual Report on Form 10-K relates that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting,
other than the above mentioned acquisition.
- 129 -
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information regarding the Company’s directors appearing under the caption ―Election of
Directors‖ in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Company’s executive officers is presented under the caption ―Executive
Officers of the Company‖ in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The other information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy
Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information regarding executive compensation in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and
related stockholder matters, including the table titled ―Equity Compensation Plan Information,‖ in
the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence in
the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding the fees paid to and services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in the Company’s Proxy Statement for
the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.
- 130 -
PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
(1)
(2)
Financial statements and financial statement schedules filed as part of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. See Part II, Item 8. ―Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.‖
The following financial statement schedule is included in this report on Form 10-K (in
thousands):
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Col. C - Additions
Col. B
Balance at Charged to
Beginning Costs &
of Period Expenses
Charged to
Other
Accounts -
Describe
Col. D
Deductions -
Describe
Col. E
Balance at
End
of Period
$
1,930 $
484 $
71 (3)(4) $
(113)(2)(4) $
2,372
$
7,775 $
5,145 (1) $
124 (4) $
(276)(5) $
12,768
$
1,830 $
288 $
170 (3)(4) $
(358)(2) $
1,930
$
6,482 $
702 (1) $
591 (3)(4) $
- $
7,775
$
2,452 $
(64) $
35 (4) $
(593)(2) $
1,830
$
5,656 $
761 (1) $
65 (4) $
- $
6,482
Col. A
Description
December 28, 2012
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance
for deferred income
tax assets
December 30, 2011
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance
for deferred income
tax assets
December 31, 2010
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance
for deferred income
tax assets
(1) Valuation allowance recorded in the provision for income taxes for certain net operating
losses and tax credits. The expense recorded in 2012 primarily relates to net operating losses
incurred by our Switzerland operations.
(2) Accounts written off, net of collections on accounts receivable previously written off.
(3) Balances recorded as a part of our 2012 acquisition of NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc. and
2011 acquisition of Micro Power Electronics, Inc.
- 131 -
(4) Includes foreign currency translation effect.
(5) Primarily relates to return to provision adjustments for prior years.
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth
therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The exhibits listed on the Exhibit
Index of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been previously filed, are filed herewith
or are incorporated herein by reference to other filings.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Dated: February 27, 2013
By /s/ Thomas J. Hook
Thomas J. Hook (Principal Executive Officer)
President & Chief Executive Officer
- 132 -
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Thomas J. Hook
Thomas J. Hook
/s/ Michael Dinkins
Michael Dinkins
/s/ Thomas J. Mazza
Thomas J. Mazza
/s/ Bill R. Sanford
Bill R. Sanford
/s/ Pamela G. Bailey
Pamela G. Bailey
/s/ Anthony P. Bihl III
Anthony P. Bihl III
/s/ Rudy A. Mazzocchi
Rudy A. Mazzocchi
/s/ Kevin C. Melia
Kevin C. Melia
/s/ Dr. Joseph A. Miller, Jr.
Dr. Joseph A. Miller, Jr.
/s/ Peter H. Soderberg
Peter H. Soderberg
/s/ William B. Summers, Jr.
William B. Summers, Jr.
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
February 27, 2013
President & Chief Executive
Officer & Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Senior Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Vice President and Corporate
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Chairman
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
- 133 -
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
EXHIBIT INDEX
DESCRIPTION
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
10.1#
10.2#
10.3#
10.4#
10.5
10.6+
10.7#
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2008).
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our annual report on
Form 10-K for the period ended January 1, 2010).
Indenture for 2¼% Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2013 dated as of March 28, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March
29, 2007).
First Supplemental Indenture dated April 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2007).
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 28, 2007 by and among us and the initial
purchasers of the Debentures described above (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2007).
1998 Stock Option Plan (including form of ―standard‖ option agreement, form of ―special‖
option agreement and form of ―non-standard‖ option agreement) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-37554)).
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to our
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on April 22, 2002).
Greatbatch, Inc. Executive Short Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit A to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on April 20, 2012).
2002 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to our Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on April 9, 2003).
License Agreement dated August 8, 1996, between Greatbatch Ltd. and Evans Capacitor
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to our Registration Statement on Form S-
1 (File No. 333-37554)).
Amendment No. 2 dated December 6, 2002, between Greatbatch Technologies, Ltd. and Evans
Capacitor Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 3, 2003).
Form of Change of Control Agreement between Greatbatch, Inc. and its executive officers
(Thomas J. Hook, Thomas J. Mazza, Mauricio Arellano, Susan M. Bratton, Michelle Graham
and Timothy G. McEvoy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2011).
- 134 -
10.8*
10.9
10.10#
10.11#
10.12#
10.13#
10.14#
10.15#
10.16#
10.17#
10.18#
10.19+
12.1*
21.1*
23.1*
31.1*
Form of Change of Control Agreement between Greatbatch, Inc. and its executive officers
(Michael Dinkins and Daniel R. Kaiser)
Credit agreement dated June 24, 2011 by and among Greatbatch Ltd., the lenders party thereto
and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, as administrative agent, Bank of America,
N.A., as syndication agent, and PNC Bank, N.A. and RBS Citizens, NA, as co-documentation
agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
June 29, 2011).
Employment Agreement dated April 10, 2010 between Greatbatch, Inc. and Thomas J. Hook
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13,
2010).
Extension of Employment Agreement dated December 29, 2012 between Greatbatch, Inc. and
Thomas J. Hook (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 4, 2013).
2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to our Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on April 20, 2007).
2009 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to our Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on April 13, 2009).
2011 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended December 7, 2011) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2011).
Form of Restricted Stock Award Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005).
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005).
Form of Nonqualified Option Award Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005).
Form of Stock Option Award Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005).
Supply Agreement for medical device components dated March 31, 2006, between Greatbatch,
Inc. and SORIN/ELA BIOMEDICA CRM and ELA MEDICAL SAS (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006).
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)
Subsidiaries of Greatbatch, Inc.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act.
- 135 -
31.2*
32.1**
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XRBL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Portions of those exhibits marked ―+‖ have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.
* - Filed herewith.
** - Furnished herewith.
# - Indicates exhibits that are management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements required to be
filed pursuant to Item 14(c) of Form 10-K.
- 136 -
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (Unaudited)
EXHIBIT 12.1
Dec. 28,
2012
Dec. 30,
2011
Year Ended
Dec. 31,
2010
Jan. 1,
2010
Jan. 2,
2009
$
6,730 $
48,392 $
49,325 $ (18,177) $
-
-
-
-
20,517
(162)
Earnings:
Income (loss) before income taxes
Pretax credits
Fixed Charges:
$
Interest expense
Capitalized interest
Discounts & deferred financing fees
Interest portion of rental expense
Total earnings and fixed charges $
5,498 $
-
12,557
1,056
25,841 $
5,539 $
-
11,389
766
66,086 $
7,839 $
-
10,680
848
68,692 $
9,930 $
-
10,106
1,053
2,912 $
10,435
171
9,583
850
41,394
Fixed Charges:
$
Interest expense
Capitalized interest
Discounts & deferred financing fees
Interest portion of rental expense
Total fixed charges
$
5,498 $
-
12,557
1,056
19,111 $
5,539 $
-
11,389
766
17,694 $
7,839 $
-
10,680
848
19,367 $
9,930 $
-
10,106
1,053
21,089 $
10,435
171
9,583
850
21,039
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
1.4
3.7
3.5
0.1
2.0
- 137 -
SUBSIDIARIES OF GREATBATCH, INC.
EXHIBIT 21.1
Subsidiary
Greatbatch Ltd.
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch, Inc.)
Greatbatch LLC
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
Greatbatch Medical, S. de R.L. de C.V.
(owned 99% by Greatbatch LLC & 1% by Greatbatch, Inc.)
Electrochem Solutions, Inc.
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
Micro Power Electronics, Inc.
(direct subsidiary of Electrochem Solutions, Inc.)
Greatbatch-Globe Tool, Inc.
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
Precimed, Inc.
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
QiG Group, LLC
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
P Medical Holding SA
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
Greatbatch Medical SA
(direct subsidiary of P Medical Holding SA)
Greatbatch Medical SAS
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Medical SA)
NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc.
(direct subsidiary of Greatbatch Ltd.)
Algostim LLC
(owned 88% by QiG Group, LLC)
- 138 -
Incorporated
New York
Delaware
Mexico
Massachusetts
Delaware
Minnesota
Pennsylvania
Delaware
Switzerland
Switzerland
France
Michigan
Delaware
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
EXHIBIT 23.1
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-61476, 333-97209,
333-129002, 333-143519, 333-161159, 333-174559, and 333-184604 on Form S-8, and Registration
Statement No. 333-142400 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 27, 2013, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Greatbatch, Inc. and subsidiary
(the ―Company‖), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greatbatch, Inc. for the year ended December 28,
2012.
Williamsville, New York
February 27, 2013
- 139 -
EXHIBIT 31.1
I, Thomas J. Hook, certify that:
CERTIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2012 of
Greatbatch, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
the report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
- 140 -
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 27, 2013
______________________________
Thomas J. Hook
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
- 141 -
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Michael Dinkins, certify that:
CERTIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2012 of
Greatbatch, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
the report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
- 142 -
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 27, 2013
_______________________________
Michael Dinkins
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
- 143 -
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned officers of Greatbatch, Inc. (the ―Company‖), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2012 (the ―Form 10-K‖) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 27, 2013
Dated: February 27, 2013
______________________________
Thomas J. Hook
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
______________________________
Michael Dinkins
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or otherwise, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless
such incorporation is expressly referenced within.
- 144 -
Corporate Leadership
Thomas J. Hook
President & Chief Executive Officer
Michael Dinkins
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Mauricio Arellano
President, Greatbatch Medical
Susan M. Bratton
President, Electrochem
Michelle Graham
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Daniel R. Kaiser, PhD
Vice President & Chief Technology Officer
Timothy G. McEvoy
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Board of Directors
Pamela G. Bailey
President and Chief Executive
Officer, The Grocery
Manufacturers Association
Anthony P. Bihl III
Retired Group President,
American Medical Systems
Holdings
Joseph W. Dziedzic
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, The Brink’s Company
Thomas J. Hook
President & Chief Executive
Officer, Greatbatch, Inc.
Rudy A. Mazzocchi
Chief Executive Officer,
ELENZA, Inc.
Kevin C. Melia
Former Non-Executive Chairman,
Vette Corporation
Joseph A. Miller, Jr.
Retired Executive Vice President
and Chief Technology Officer,
Corning, Inc.
Bill R. Sanford, Chairman
Founder and Chairman,
Symark LLC
Peter H. Soderberg
Managing Partner,
Worthy Ventures Resources, LLC
William B. Summers, Jr.
Retired Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer ,
McDonald Investments, Inc.
Global Headquarters
Greatbatch, Inc.
2595 Dallas Parkway, Suite 310
Frisco, Texas 75034
Internet Address
www.greatbatch.com
Common Stock Listing
New York Stock Exchange
Trading Symbol: GB
Investor Information
Shareholders, securities analysts and investors seeking more information about the company can access
information via the Internet or from the Investor Relations Department:
Greatbatch, Inc.
2595 Dallas Parkway, Suite 310
Frisco, Texas 75034
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Computershare
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
www.computershare.com/investor
Dedicated Toll Free Number: 1-877-832-7265
TDD Hearing Impaired: 800-231-5469
TDD Foreign Stockholders: 1-201-680-6610
Foreign Stockholders: 1-201-680-6578
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Williamsville, NY
Greatbatch, Inc.
2595 Dallas Parkway
Suite 310
Frisco, Texas 75034
(716) 759-5600
www.greatbatch.com