Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Medical - Devices / Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation

Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation

iart · NASDAQ Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker iart
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Healthcare
Industry Medical - Devices
Employees 4396
← All annual reports
FY2018 Annual Report · Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2018 Annual Report

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

In  1989,  Dr.  Richard  Caruso  had  a  vision  to  expand  access  to  promising  technology  that  enabled  the 
human body to regenerate damaged or diseased tissues. Through his vision and persistence, he founded 
Integra  LifeSciences  and  revolutionized  the  field  of  regenerative  medicine,  giving  burn  victims  hope 
where it did not exist. Under the leadership of Stuart Essig, the company further expanded the use of 
this technology to other areas such as dural and nerve repair.

Thirty  years  later,  Integra  LifeSciences  has  become  a  global  leader  in  regenerative  medicine  and 
neurosurgery. Every day, 4,500 Integra colleagues continue to bring hope to patients around the world 
through our broad portfolio of innovative medical technologies and products for wound care, surgical 
reconstruction, neurosurgery and extremity orthopedics.   

For the fifth consecutive year, Integra delivered double-digit revenue and adjusted earnings per share growth. Total revenues 
increased  24  percent  to  $1.47  billion  and  adjusted  earnings  per  share  increased  25  percent  to  $2.42.  We  generated  nearly                    
$200  million  of  operating  cash  and  over  $120  million  in  free  cash  flow,  both  of  which  were  records  for  the  company.  We 
significantly strengthened our capital structure, providing additional flexibility to support our long-term strategic plans.

Our Codman Specialty Surgical business grew 33.8 percent to nearly $964 million in reported sales versus the prior year, while 
organic sales increased 3.4 percent. This growth was driven by the Codman Neurosurgery acquisition, continued strength of our 
CUSA® Clarity Ultrasonic Tissue Ablation System, and growth in our dural access and repair franchise.

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies revenues were $508 million dollars, representing an increase of 8.7 percent on a reported 
basis and 5.5 percent on an organic basis compared to the prior year. This performance is the result of the broad-based strength 
of our regenerative technologies business, resulting from the expansion and increased focus of our commercial sales teams.

ACCELERATING GROWTH

We remained steadfast to the four pillars of our strategy, which we implemented a few years ago, and sharpened 
our focus on our priorities, positioning us well to accelerate growth.

In 2018, we delivered on the transition goals for the Codman Neurosurgery business, executing our integration 
plan with minimal commercial disruption while preserving employee and customer retention rates at or above 
plan.  In  July,  we  exited  transition  services  agreements  in  the  United  States,  Canada,  Australia,  New  Zealand 
and China. We opened a new facility in Mansfield, Massachusetts, and relocated the first group of Codman 
conveyed  colleagues  in  March.  We  also  transitioned  the  Le  Locle,  Switzerland,  manufacturing  operations  in 
the fourth quarter of 2018. To support the Codman integration, we made investments in global infrastructure, 
manufacturing,  distribution  and  support  services,  which  maximize  the  potential  of  our  larger  commercial 
organizations and our broader product portfolio, extending our international reach.

With the acquisition of Codman, and the investments we’ve made, we now have relevant scale in the global 
neurosurgery market to match our leadership position in the regenerative tissue space.

In the Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies business, we realigned our inpatient wound reconstruction and 
extremity  orthopedic  sales  coverage  as  part  of  our  channel  expansion  strategy.  As  a  result,  we  saw  strong 
sales performance in our regenerative technologies franchise, which we attribute to more focused customer 
attention. We established several important partnerships, including a program with Healogics®, Inc., in which 
we are a primary provider of cellular-based tissue products for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. We 
recently signed an agreement with the Consortium of Focused Orthopedists for the development of a short 
stem and stemless shoulder system, a key addition to Integra’s extremity orthopedics portfolio in a fast-growing 
segment of the shoulder arthroplasty market. In addition, our ability to pursue broader contracting ensures we 
deliver greater value to our customers and patients.

Driving innovation with our new product pipeline is essential to improving clinical care, and ultimately, patient 
outcomes. Last year, we launched AmnioExcel® Plus Amniotic Allograft Membrane, our next-generation amniotic 
tissue product, in Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States. We also launched the Integra® XT Revision Total 
Ankle Replacement System, which has been well-received by surgeons who expressed excitement for our approach 
to ankle revision surgery. In Japan, we introduced the CUSA Clarity Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator System platform 
and received regulatory approval for the Bactiseal® catheter. CUSA Clarity continues to gain traction in the United 
States with 30 percent of the top neurosurgery and pediatric hospitals now using our tissue ablation platform.

Recently, we announced the full market release of the Integra® Titan Reverse Shoulder System-S, which includes 
a  new  glenoid  baseplate  design  to  expand  the  Integra®  Titan  Reverse  Shoulder  System.  We  also  launched 
Integra® Panta® 2 TTC Arthrodesis Nail System for tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) fusion of the ankle due to severe 
arthritis, offering surgeons and patients the latest innovations in implants and instrumentation for effective 
TTC fusion.

We continued to focus on improving operational efficiency. During the second half of 2018, we invested in our 
regenerative manufacturing facilities to increase capacity by adding shifts, running additional lines and making 
capital improvements to drive efficiencies. Last year, we took the final steps to streamline our ERP systems from 
30 a few years ago, to just one global platform. This implementation will play a significant role in laying the 
foundation  to  integrate  more  systems,  increasing  colleague  productivity  and  positively  impacting  customer 
experience. For example, we introduced an online customer portal in the United States for our customers to 
track their order status and invoices in real time. Moving forward, we will easily be able to further enhance our 
customer interactions and service delivery, increasing our agility as a company.

COMMITMENT TO OUR PEOPLE

At the heart of our business are our 4,500 Integra colleagues. Our success is dependent on our ability to attract, 
develop and retain the most talented individuals, and to inspire them with our mission of making a difference in 
the quality of life of patients that encounter an Integra product, service or colleague.

As our company evolves, we are focused on acquiring and building critical skills and capabilities to support our 
strategy. In 2018, we welcomed a significant number of new colleagues globally and built skill sets for the future 

through training programs, job rotations, expanded roles, and new job opportunities. We continue to enhance 
our leadership pipeline, providing tools designed to deliver results and enable leaders to more effectively set 
direction, communicate, and develop their teams.

We have made great strides in our aspiration of an inclusive and engaged culture. In 2018, I took the action 
pledge  for  diversity  and  inclusion  through  the  CEO  Action  for  Diversity  &  Inclusion™,  the  largest  CEO-
driven business commitment to advance diversity and inclusion within the workplace. In addition, our senior 
leaders completed micro-inequities training to strengthen their awareness of unconscious biases and micro-
inequities, so our colleagues at Integra feel valued, and their ideas and perspectives are appreciated. Finally, our 
employee resource groups continue to grow and serve as forums to connect, share best practices, and develop 
professionally. Specifically, our Women of Integra Network now has chapters at each of our major locations 
around the world.

In November, we welcomed Eric Schwartz as corporate vice president, general counsel and secretary. Eric brings 
extensive  experience  in  the  healthcare  industry,  including  in  the  areas  of  strategic  acquisitions,  regulatory, 
commercial contracting, and corporate governance.

Last year, we suffered a loss with the passing of longtime board member James Sullivan, who had been a director 
since 1992. Jim was a champion of Integra’s mission and values, and was passionate about bringing healthcare 
solutions to patients.

We  also  welcomed  Rhonda  Germany  Ballintyn  to  the  Integra  board  of  directors  in  December.  Her  extensive 
experience  in  general  management,  marketing,  operations,  and  strategy  are  strong  assets  as  we  grow  and 
expand globally.

A PROMISING OUTLOOK

With the integration of Codman Neurosurgery nearing completion, important channel investments in place, 
and  exciting  new  product  introductions  on  the  horizon,  we  expect  to  reap  the  benefits  of  a  comprehensive 
product portfolio, a larger and more focused sales team, and a broader global footprint.

We have adhered to a strong set of core values, including integrity, focus on our people, excellence, embracing 
change, decisiveness, and teamwork. We live these values every day with passion, determination, and purpose. 
We  make  products  that  help  surgeons  remove  brain  tumors,  repair  shoulders,  heal  burnt  skin,  and  restore 
damaged  nerves.  It  is  this  unwavering  commitment  and  our  tireless  efforts  to  do  well  for  our  customers, 
patients, and colleagues that have been central to our success.

As  we  approach  the  company’s  30th  year,  I  remain  as  confident  as  ever  in  Integra’s  ability  to  meet  our  full 
potential. We have the right strategy, the right teams, and the right areas of focus to accelerate growth. I believe 
in  our  people  and  in  our  ability  to  do  well  for  shareholders  and  the  communities  we  serve,  while  making  a 
difference for patients.

On behalf of the board of directors, executive leadership team, and our 4,500 Integra colleagues, thank you 
for your trust and confidence. It is a privilege to make products that have such a positive impact on the lives of 
people around the world.

Sincerely,

Peter J. Arduini
President and CEO

 
BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Standing (L to R): Stuart M. Essig, Ph.D., 
Managing Director, Prettybrook Partners, 
LLC, and Chairman of the Board; Christian 
S. Schade, President and Chief Executive 
Officer, Aprea Therapeutics, and Chair, 
Finance Committee; Rhonda G. Ballintyn, 
former Chief Strategy and Marketing 
Officer, Honeywell International; Peter 
J. Arduini, President and Chief Executive 
Officer, Integra LifeSciences; Donald E. 
Morel, Jr., Ph.D., former Chief Executive 
Officer, West Pharmaceutical Services, 
Inc., and Chair, Compensation Committee; 
Keith Bradley, Ph.D., former Professor 
of International Management and 
Management Strategy, Open University 
and Cass Business School, U.K.   

Seated (L to R): Lloyd W. Howell, Jr., Chief 
Financial Officer and Treasurer, Booz 
Allen Hamilton; Barbara B. Hill, Operating 
Partner, NexPhase Capital, and Chair, 
Nominating and Corporate Governance 
Committee; Raymond G. Murphy, former 
Senior Vice President and Treasurer, Time 
Warner Inc., and Chair, Audit Committee 

Peter J. Arduini
President and 
Chief Executive Officer 

Kenneth Burhop
Corporate Vice President, 
Chief Scientific Officer

Glenn G. Coleman
Chief Financial Officer and 
Corporate Vice President, 
International

William Compton
Senior Vice President, 
Chief Information Officer

Robert T. Davis, Jr.
Corporate Vice President and 
President, Orthopedics and 
Tissue Technologies

Sravan K. Emany
Senior Vice President, Strategy, 
Treasury, and Investor Relations

Lisa Evoli
Corporate Vice President, 
Chief Human Resources Officer

Paul Gonsalves
Senior Vice President, 
Chief Commercial Officer

Michael McBreen
Senior Vice President and 
President, International

John Mooradian
Corporate Vice President, 
Global Operations and 
Supply Chain

Judith E. O’Grady, 
R.N., M.S.N., R.A.C.
Corporate Vice President, 
Global Regulatory Affairs

Maria Platsis
Senior Vice President, 
Corporate Development

Dan Reuvers
Corporate Vice President 
and President, 
Codman Specialty Surgical

Eric Schwartz
Corporate Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary

Joseph Vinhais
Corporate Vice President, 
Global Quality Assurance

 
REDISCOVERING LIFE
AFTER A BRAIN INJURY

A violent car crash turned Cameron Hutcheson’s 
normal  day  of  school  and  football  into  a  battle 
for  his  life.  On  his  way  home,  he  fell  asleep  at 
the wheel and hit three street signs and a street 
light  before  his  car  landed  upside  down.  It  took 
emergency personnel over an hour to remove him 
from the wreckage.

At  the  hospital,  Cameron  registered  with  a  low 
Glasgow  Coma  Scale  score  and  was  diagnosed 
with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to his left frontal 
lobe and a damaged brain stem. Cameron’s doctor 
immediately used the Integra® Licox® Monitor to 
begin treating his TBI.

The  Licox  Monitor  measures  intracranial  oxygen 
and  temperature  and  is  intended  as  an  adjunct 
monitor of trends of these parameters, indicating 
the  perfusion  status  of  cerebral  tissue  local  to 
sensor placement.

With  the  Licox  Monitor,  the  doctor  attending  to 
Cameron could see his brain tissue oxygen value 
in real time and had the information necessary to 
carefully manage his therapy.

“Cameron  is  proof  that  your  hard  work  and 
technological strides have really made a difference 
in not only the victim’s life, but the family’s lives,” 
said Cameron’s father, regarding the role Integra 
played  in  his  son’s  recovery.  “I  am  so  grateful  to 
hear Cameron’s laugh every day.”

Today, Cameron is 33 years old and says that he’s 
never  felt  better.  He  is  fully  recovered  from  his 
brain injury and regained the ability to walk, talk, 
and even run. He has since completed college and 
traveled  throughout  South  America  in  hopes  of 
helping to improve the lives of others.

CODMAN 
SPECIALTY SURGICAL

Codman Specialty Surgical (CSS) offers global, market-leading 
technologies,  brands  and  instrumentation.  Our  product 
portfolio represents a continuum of care from pre-operative, 
to  the  neurosurgery  operating  room,  to  the  neuro-critical 
care unit and post-care for both adult and pediatric patients 
suffering  from  brain  injuries,  cerebrospinal  fluid  pressure 
complications and other neurological conditions. Additionally, 
our CSS portfolio includes a range of surgical instrumentation, 
as well as specialty instruments, used in acute care surgical 
centers.  CSS  also  offers  valuable  services  to  central  sterile 
processing departments of hospitals with its proprietary asset 
management software and inventory support.

After  the  acquisition  of  Codman  Neurosurgery  from 
Johnson  &  Johnson  in  2017,  Integra  continued  to  execute 
the 
integration  plan  throughout  2018  with  minimal 
disruption. In July, we exited transition service agreements 
(TSAs) in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand 
and  China.  We  also  transitioned  service  and  repair  and 
regulatory services in China, and manufacturing operations 
in Le Locle, Switzerland. We relocated conveyed employees 
in Raynham, Massachusetts, to a new facility in Mansfield, 
Massachusetts,  which  will  also  be  the  future  Codman 
manufacturing facility. 

More  recently,  we  successfully  exited  TSAs  covering  15 
countries in Western Europe and migrated our ERP system 
from  multiple  platforms  to  one.  We  also  transitioned 
several countries in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, which 
are referred to as Day 2 countries. In the coming months, 

NO MORE MISSING 
OUT ON LIFE

At  the  age  of  76,  Anne  Nordstrom  became  in-
creasingly forgetful and was losing her ability to 
walk and control her bladder.

“I  felt  I  was  losing  myself.  I  couldn’t  remember 
simple  things,”  said  Anne.  “I  would  read  a  few 
pages of a book and then forget what I just read. 
Getting around was difficult, too. I loved watching 
the grandkids playing sports. Our family loved to 
travel, but we had to give that up while I was going 
through all of this. It was really a scary time.”

Anne  was  initially  diagnosed  with  a  form  of 
dementia,  commonly  known  as  Alzheimer’s 
disease.  As  her  symptoms  became  progressively 
worse, she sought various medical opinions that 
diagnosed  her  with  everything  from  Parkinson’s, 
a disease her father had, to part of aging or side 
effects  of  her  medication.  In  2017,  Anne  met 
with  a  neurosurgeon  who,  after  conducting 
several  tests,  including  an  MRI  and  a  spinal  tap 
procedure  to  remove  the  excess  fluid  from  her 
brain, finally determined Anne was suffering from 
normal  pressure  hydrocephalus  (NPH)  all  along. 
She  then  was  implanted  with  the  Certas®  Plus 
Programmable Valve, a shunt device that provides 
constant  intraventricular  pressure  and  drainage 
of  cerebral  spine  fluid  for  the  management  of 
hydrocephalus.  Certas  Plus  has  eight  different 
settings  that  can  be  adjusted  with  a  special 
magnetic programmer at a doctor’s office.

After  nearly  three  years  of  uncertainty,  Anne 
regained cognitive function. She is back to doing 
what she used to love – gardening, reading books, 
feeding the deer, and taking care of the hens with 
her husband.

“I  missed  out  on  many  things  over  the  last  two 
years,” Anne said. “I want people to be aware of 
what NPH looks like because I don’t want others 
to miss any part of their life like I did.”

•  Represents 65 percent of global revenues in 2018
•  Global leader in neurosurgery

we will complete the transition of Japan, the last remaining 
country  on  a  TSA  agreement,  and  additional  Day  2 
countries in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and Africa. 
We expect to complete the majority of these transitions by 
the end of the third quarter of 2019. 

New product introductions that will address unmet needs 
in surgical care across multiple franchises in CSS is a critical 
growth driver for 2019 and the coming years. We recently 
expanded our Certas™ Plus line providing surgeons more 
options  in  the  treatment  of  hydrocephalus  patients  and 
introduced a new handpiece with new surgical tips for our 
CUSA® Clarity Ultrasonic Tissue Ablation System to better 
enable surgeons to remove fibrous tissue and bone swiftly 
and safely. Additional new products include: Integra® Duo 
Surgical headlight, which offers surgeons superior comfort 
and  the  brightest  visualization  during  surgery  compared 
to  a  leading  competitor;  and  CereLink™  ICP  monitoring 
system, which gives healthcare teams advanced real-time 
data  and the features they need to  best  manage patients 
to therapy.

With  our  broader  portfolio  of  quality  surgical  products, 
combined with our strong U.S. distribution model, we are 
able to serve the needs of hundreds of physicians, dental 
and  veterinary  offices.  Moreover,  our  global  commercial 
network, which includes clinical specialists, a large direct 
sales  force,  and  strategic  partnerships  and  distributors, 
expands our reach to hospitals, integrated health networks, 
group purchasing organizations, clinicians, surgery centers, 
and healthcare providers throughout the world.

INTEGRATED MEDICINE

While in her kitchen, Kelly Rader-Murphy hit her 
head on the corner of one of her cabinet doors. 
She  sustained  a  small  puncture  wound,  which 
caused no concern to Kelly until a few weeks later 
when  she  and  her  husband  realized  the  wound 
was not healing.

After  a  doctor’s  visit  to  get  her  wound  checked, 
her  physician  had  suspicions  and  sent  her 
to  a  specialist  for  verification.  The  specialist 
diagnosed Kelly with basal cell carcinoma, a form 
of  skin  cancer  that  required  surgical  treatment. 
Mohs  surgery  was  performed,  and  after  several 
attempts to remove all the cancerous tissue, there 
was no skin left to help close Kelly’s wound.

She  was  transferred  to  a  nearby  hospital  where 
the surgeon offered Kelly a plan of treatment that 
was  unsettling.  Kelly  wanted  better  for  herself, 
and after working closely with her surgeon, they 
agreed  on  a  course  of  treatment  that  involved 
Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template (IDRT).

IDRT  is  a  two-layer  skin  regeneration  system 
indicated for the treatment of burns and wounds. 
When  applied  to  an  excise-viable  wound  bed, 
IDRT  acts  as  the  skin  epidermis  and  heals  in 
phases that lead to skin regeneration. After IDRT 
allowed Kelly’s scalp to regenerate and cover her 
exposed  skull,  her  surgeon  was  able  to  apply  a 
split-thickness skin graft that incorporated so well 
that Kelly’s hair and skin were restored, allowing 
her to return to her normal activities.

“My story is about my skin and Integra skin – and 
they’ve become one,” said Kelly.

ORTHOPEDICS & 
TISSUE TECHNOLOGIES

regenerative 

The Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies (OTT) portfolio 
delivers  broad  and  deep  solutions  that  address  tissue 
regeneration,  surgical 
reconstruction,  and  extremity 
orthopedic  repair.  Integra  is  a  pioneer  and  global  leader 
in 
Integra®  Dermal 
technologies.  Our 
Regeneration  Template  was  the  first  product  approved 
by  the  FDA  to  regenerate  dermal  tissue.  Since  then,  we 
have  built  our  expertise  in  regenerative  medicine  to 
accommodate  a  broad  range  of  specialties,  including 
wound  reconstruction,  plastic,  and  reconstructive  and 
general surgery. Our regenerative products have been used 
successfully in more than 10 million procedures worldwide. 
We  also  have  a  comprehensive  extremity  orthopedics 
portfolio focused on innovation and clinical differentiation 
with our ankle and shoulder arthroplasty, and regenerative 
nerve and tendon products. The OTT business also includes 
private  label  sales  of  our  regenerative  and  wound  care 
technologies, serving other medical technology companies 
that  sell  to  end  markets,  primarily  in  orthopedics,  spine, 
surgical, and wound care.

In 2018,  we created dedicated sales channels for  inpatient 
wound  reconstruction,  outpatient  advanced  wound  care, 
surgical  reconstruction,  and  extremity  orthopedics  to 
increase our presence in the operating room and leverage our 
expertise to go deeper clinically with our regenerative and 
orthopedic technologies. These investments increased the 
time our commercial teams were spending with customers, 
resulting in positive sales performance of our regenerative 
technologies.  Last  year,  we  launched  AmnioExcel®  Plus 
Amniotic Allograft Membrane, our next-generation amniotic 
tissue product, in the Veterans Affairs hospitals. Integra was 
also selected as a primary provider for cellular-based tissue 
products  for  the  treatment  of  acute  and  chronic  complex 
wounds within Healogics® Inc.’s new iSupply program.

IN HER SHOES

At just 12 years old, Sallie Wilson was diagnosed 
with diabetes. Back in the 1970s, advancements in 
diabetic care were limited, which prevented  Sallie 
from living a normal life. The diabetic struggle fol-
lowed Sallie into adulthood, ultimately damaging 
her kidneys and landing her on the transplant list.

After  receiving  a  new  kidney  from  a  donor  who 
had passed away, Sally  was able  to continue her 
advocacy work promoting organ donation.

Through this charitable work, she met her donor’s 
family at a  fundraising event. From this meeting 
began  a  lifelong  friendship  that  would  change 
Sallie’s life.

One  of  the  donor’s  family  members,  LuAnn 
Grover,  happened  to  be  an  employee  of  Integra 
LifeSciences.  She  had  noticed  Sallie  wearing  an 
offloading boot, which is designed to take weight 
off of the foot in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. 
Through LuAnn’s knowledge of Integra’s portfolio 
of acute and chronic wound care products, LuAnn 
thought that Sallie may be a potential candidate 
for  PriMatrix®  Dermal  Repair  Scaffold,  a  unique 
skin repair product designed for the management 
of a broad range of wound types. Once PriMatrix 
was  used  to  treat  Sallie’s  diabetic  foot  ulcer,  her 
wound completely healed in a matter of months.

Sallie always hoped to be able to wear two shoes 
and  walk  without  pain.  “My  life  has  improved  a 
whole  lot,”  said  Sallie  after  her  wound  healed. 
“I  can  now  wear  two  shoes  to  work,  go  to  the 
grocery  store,  travel,  and  do  things  for  myself. 
This is the life I want to have.”

•  Represents 35 percent of global revenues in 2018
•  Market leader in regenerative skin products for burns 

and total contact casting

•  Top three in amniotic products for ocular applications, 

and in peripheral nerve repair

•  Top three in hand and wrist and ankle replacement

Our  surgical  reconstruction  sales  channel  is  focused  on 
plastic and reconstructive surgery, and hernia procedures, 
offering differentiated products and a portfolio of amniotic 
products  sold  through  our  distributors.  The  addition 
of  SurgiMend®  MP  Collagen  Matrix  to  our  portfolio  of 
biologic soft tissue repair products provided more options 
for surgeons, who are looking to address the challenging 
hernia  repair  needs  of  patients  with  complex  abdominal 
wall conditions.

In  extremity  orthopedics,  we  launched  innovative  new 
products  such  as  the  Integra®  XT  Revision  Total  Ankle 
Replacement  System,  and  expanded  the  commercial 
availability  of  Cadence®  Total  Ankle  System,  our  ankle 
prosthesis  developed  in  partnership  with  world-leading 
foot  and  ankle  surgeons.  In  addition,  we  launched  the 
Integra® Panta® 2 TTC Arthrodesis Nail System for tibiotalo-
calcaneal fusion of the ankle due to severe arthritis.

We  strengthened  our  shoulder  portfolio  with  the  full 
market  release  of  the  Integra®  Titan™  Reverse  Shoulder 
System-S  and  are  collaborating  with  the  Consortium  of 
Focused Orthopedists to develop a short stem and stemless 
shoulder system. With our focused extremity orthopedics 
channel  and  new  product  introductions,  we  saw  healthy 
growth  rates  with  our  shoulder  and  ankle  portfolio.  We 
also have a rich heritage in peripheral nerve repair and are 
excited  about  new  product  introductions  in  2019  to  help 
continue our efforts to improve patient outcomes.

•  The international business accounts  

for 29 percent of revenues

•  Integra products are sold in more than 130 countries

investments 

In  2018,  we  continued  to  make  investments  to  support 
international  expansion.  These 
in  global 
infrastructure,  manufacturing,  distribution  and  support 
services,  made  as  part  of  the  Codman  integration,  will 
allow  us  to  leverage  our  larger  commercial  organizations 
and  broader  product  portfolio,  ultimately  positioning  the 
company to accelerate growth.

introductions, 

Our  success  globally  will  be  built  on  three  pillars  of  our 
international  strategy  –  strong  commercial  organization, 
and 
new  product 
development  of  international  markets.  As  we  look  to  the 
future,  this  combination  of  capabilities  positions  Integra’s 
international business to be a significant driver of growth 
in the coming years.

expansion 

and 

INCREASING OUR 
GLOBAL FOOTPRINT

international  expansion 

Integra’s 
is  crucial  to  our 
long-term  growth.  We  continue  to  build  a  commercial 
organization  and  logistics  infrastructure  that  will  enable 
us  to  distribute  products  globally.  A  few  years  ago,  our 
international  business  accounted  for  only  23  percent 
of  our  global  revenue  and  was  heavily  dependent  on 
third-party  distributors.  With  the  acquisition  of  Codman 
Neurosurgery,  we  have 
international 
footprint,  reaching  more  than  130  countries  through  our 
direct-selling  efforts  and  distributor  or  dealer  networks. 
Europe  makes  up  approximately  50  percent  of  our 
international  sales,  with  Asia-Pacific,  Latin  America, 
Canada, Middle East, and Africa representing the balance.

increased  our 

The  Asia-Pacific  region  remains  a  bright  spot  as  we 
continued  to  see  strong  growth  in  our  larger  markets 
in  the  region.  Following  the  Codman  integration,  we 
added  more  than  50  percent  commercial  resources  and 
support  services.  In  China  alone,  we  grew  to  more  than 
70  colleagues,  up  from  24  several  years  ago.  In  Japan,  we 
shifted  to  a  direct  sales  model  and  have  increased  the 
headcount  from  approximately  11  sales  representatives 
to more than 70 colleagues in sales and support services. 
In  addition,  we  continued  to  advance  our  new  product 
introductions.  We 
launched  CUSA®  Clarity  Ultrasonic 
Surgical Aspirator System in Japan last year, which was well-
received by surgeons. We received regulatory approval for 
the BactiSeal® catheter and more recently, DuraGen® Dural 
Regeneration  Matrix,  making  it  the  first  and  only  non-
autologous collagen xenograft approved for use as a dural 
substitute in the country.

A LIFESAVING COLLABORATION BUILT ON SWISS WATCH PRECISION

Luc  Tissot,  a  visionary  keenly  attuned  to  the  latest 
technological  advances,  created  the  Tissot  Foundation 
in  1980  with  the  idea  of  applying  the  precision  of  Swiss 
industries  such  as  medical 
watchmaking  to  other 
technologies.  Coincidentally, 
in  another  part  of  the 
world, Professor Salomón Hakim, a leading neurosurgeon 
from  Bogotá,  Colombia,  was  looking  for  a  way  to  perfect 
a  programming  system  – 
inspired  by  watchmaking 
technologies – to regulate pressure in the brain and better 
treat hydrocephalus. That’s when he turned to Luc Tissot.

From  this  incredible  collaboration  between  Luc  Tissot, 
Professor  Hakim,  and  Tissot  engineer 
Jean-Jacques 
Dessaules,  emerged  the  world’s  first  programmable  valve 
to  treat  hydrocephalus,  known  as  the  Codman®  Hakim® 
Programmable Valve.

When Luc Tissot financed and contributed to development 
of the Hakim valve, he had no idea that 30 years later he 
would  suffer  from  hydrocephalus  and  personally  benefit 
from this technology.

“Four years ago, I started to experience balance problems 
while walking,” said Tissot. “I went through a series of tests 
and results revealed my intracranial pressure was way above 
normal. After the diagnosis, I was implanted with the Hakim 
valve and all my balance problems disappeared. It was an 
extraordinary feeling being able to walk normally again!”

“I  never  thought  that  one  day,  I  would  benefit  from  this 
product I helped develop. It is truly remarkable.”

Hakim is a registered trademark of Hakim USA, LLC, and is used under license.

 
 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

5-Year IART and Peer Performance

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

-50

Peer 
Average

IART
S&P HC Equip

NASDAQ

R1000

3
1
/
1
3
/
2
1

4
1
/
1
3
/
1
0

4
1
/
8
2
/
2
0

4
1
/
1
3
/
3
0

4
1
/
0
3
/
4
0

4
1
/
1
3
/
5
0

4
1
/
0
3
/
6
0

4
1
/
1
3
/
7
0

4
1
/
1
3
/
8
0

4
1
/
0
3
/
9
0

4
1
/
1
3
/
0
1

4
1
/
0
3
/
1
1

4
1
/
1
3
/
2
1

5
1
/
1
3
/
1
0

5
1
/
8
2
/
2
0

5
1
/
1
3
/
3
0

5
1
/
0
3
/
4
0

5
1
/
1
3
/
5
0

5
1
/
0
3
/
6
0

5
1
/
1
3
/
7
0

5
1
/
1
3
/
8
0

5
1
/
0
3
/
9
0

5
1
/
1
3
/
0
1

5
1
/
0
3
/
1
1

5
1
/
1
3
/
2
1

6
1
/
1
3
/
1
0

6
1
/
9
2
/
2
0

6
1
/
1
3
/
3
0

6
1
/
0
3
/
4
0

6
1
/
1
3
/
5
0

6
1
/
0
3
/
6
0

6
1
/
1
3
/
7
0

6
1
/
1
3
/
8
0

6
1
/
0
3
/
9
0

6
1
/
1
3
/
0
1

6
1
/
0
3
/
1
1

6
1
/
1
3
/
2
1

7
1
/
1
3
/
1
0

7
1
/
8
2
/
2
0

7
1
/
1
3
/
3
0

7
1
/
0
3
/
4
0

7
1
/
1
3
/
5
0

7
1
/
0
3
/
6
0

7
1
/
1
3
/
7
0

7
1
/
1
3
/
8
0

7
1
/
0
3
/
9
0

7
1
/
1
3
/
0
1

7
1
/
0
3
/
1
1

7
1
/
1
3
/
2
1

8
1
/
1
3
/
1
0

8
1
/
8
2
/
2
0

8
1
/
1
3
/
3
0

8
1
/
0
3
/
4
0

8
1
/
1
3
/
5
0

8
1
/
0
3
/
6
0

8
1
/
1
3
/
7
0

8
1
/
1
3
/
8
0

8
1
/
0
3
/
9
0

8
1
/
1
3
/
0
1

8
1
/
0
3
/
1
1

8
1
/
1
3
/
2
1

2018 Revenues by Product Category

2018 Revenues by Geographic Area

Codman Specialty Surgical

Europe

United States

65%

35%

71%

14%

15%

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies

Rest of World

Total Revenues

Operating Cash Flow

Diluted Earnings Per Share1

$1,472.4

$1,188.2

$992.1

)
s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M
n

i

$
(

1500

1200

900

600

300

0

$199.7

$116.4

$114.5

)
s
n
o

i
l
l
i

M
n

i

$
(

200

150

100

50

0

2016

2017

2018

2016

2017

2018

$2.42

$1.94

$1.76

2.5

2.0

1.5

$0.94

1.0

$0.82

$0.72

)
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
e
r
a
h
S
r
e
P
(

0.5

0.0

2016

2017

2018

GAAP

Non-GAAP

1.  A reconciliation of GAAP net income to adjusted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 is available on our corporate website at: http://investor.integralife.com/financial-information.

A LIFESAVING COLLABORATION BUILT ON SWISS WATCH PRECISION

 
 
 
 
 
 
ABOUT INTEGRA

Integra LifeSciences is a global leader in regenerative technologies, neurosurgical and extremity orthopedic solutions 
dedicated to limiting uncertainty for clinicians, so they can focus on providing the best patient care. Integra offers a 
comprehensive portfolio of high quality, leadership brands that include AmnioExcel®, Bactiseal®, Cadence®, Certas™, 
Codman®, CUSA®, DuraGen®, DuraSeal®, ICP Express®, Integra®, MAYFIELD®, MediHoney®, MicroFrance®, PriMatrix®, Salto 
Talaris®, SurgiMend®, TCC-EZ®, Titan™, and VersaTru™. For the latest news and information about Integra and its brands, 
please visit www.integralife.com.

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Annual Meeting
The 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will
be held at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, May 16, 2019 at:

Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
315 Enterprise Drive, Plainsboro, New Jersey, 08536

Stock Trading Information
Integra stock trades on the Nasdaq National 
Market under the symbol ‘‘IART.’’

Investor Relations
Contact the Integra Investor Relations department 
at IR@integralife.com for business-related inquiries. 

Stockholders may obtain, without charge, 
a copy of the following documents:

•  Proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting  

of Stockholders

•  Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
•  Additional copies of the 2018 Annual Report

Requests for these documents should be addressed to:

Investor Relations Department 
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation 
311 Enterprise Drive, Plainsboro, New Jersey, 08536 
Email: IR@integralife.com

OUR LOCATIONS

Website Address
Additional information about the Company, including a 
copy of this Annual Report and quarterly reports on Form 
10-Q, a description of our business and products, recent 
financial data and press releases, investor relations calendar, 
and stock price information is available on our website 
at www.integralife.com. 

Headquarters
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation 
311 Enterprise Drive, Plainsboro, New Jersey, 08536 
Telephone: 800-654-2873 
Fax: 888-980-7742

Stock Account Maintenance
Our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust 
Company, can help you with a variety of stockholder-related 
services, including:

•  Change of address 
•  Lost stock certificates 
•  Transfer of stock to another person 
•  Verification of your holdings

You can call our transfer agent toll-free at (800) 937-5449 
or reach them on the internet at www.astfinancial.com.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Florham Park, New Jersey

UNITED STATES
Añasco, Puerto Rico
Austin, Texas
Billerica, Massachusetts
Boston, Massachusetts
Cincinnati, Ohio
Mansfield, Massachusetts
Memphis, Tennessee
Plainsboro, New Jersey
Reno, Nevada
San Diego, California

West Valley City, Utah
York, Pennsylvania

INTERNATIONAL
Andover, United Kingdom
Beijing, China
Biot, France
Clayton, Australia
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Dublin, Ireland

Ghent, Belgium
Guzman, Mexico
Le Locle, Switzerland
Lyon, France
Milan, Italy
Nantong, China
Oakville, Canada
Ratingen, Germany
Rietheim-Weilheim, Germany
Saint-Aubin, France

Shanghai, China
Tokyo, Japan
Toronto, Canada
Tullamore, Ireland
Zapopan, Mexico
Zaventem, Belgium

Integra and the Integra logo are registered trademarks of Integra LifeSciences Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. MAYFIELD is a registered trademark of SM USA, Inc. and is used by Integra under license. 
©2019 Integra LifeSciences Corporation. All rights reserved. 

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

È

‘

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from

to

or

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-26224
INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
311 ENTERPRISE DRIVE
PLAINSBORO, NEW JERSEY
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

51-0317849
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER
IDENTIFICATION NO.)
08536
(ZIP CODE)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (609) 275-0500
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of Each Class

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, Par Value $.01 Per Share

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant

Act. Yes È No ‘

is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act. Yes ‘ No È

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller
reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer È Accelerated filer ‘ Non-accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ Emerging growth company ‘
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for

complying with any new revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ‘

Indicate by check mark whether

Act). Yes ‘ No È

the registrant

is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of

the Exchange

As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately
$4,504.4 million based upon the closing sales price of the registrant’s common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market on such date. The
number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of February 22, 2019 was 85,229,075.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its scheduled May 16, 2019 Annual Meeting of

Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1A.

Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 4.

PART II

Item 5.

Item 6.

Item 7.

Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . .

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 8.

Item 9.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures . .

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9B.

Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

Item 10.

Item 11.

Item 12.

Item 13.

Item 14.

PART IV

Item 15.

Item 16.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Form 10-K Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

1

12

32

32

32

33

34

35

37

58

61

61

61

62

64

78

79

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

PART I

The terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Company” and “Integra” refer to Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,

a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, unless the context suggests otherwise.

Integra, headquartered in Plainsboro, New Jersey, is a world leader in medical technology. The Company
was founded in 1989 with the acquisition of an engineered collagen technology platform used to repair and
regenerate tissue. Since then, Integra has developed numerous product lines from this technology for applications
ranging from burn and deep tissue wounds, to the repair of dura mater in the brain, and the repair of nerves and
tendons. The Company has expanded its base regenerative technology business to include surgical instruments,
neurosurgical products, advanced wound care, and orthopedic hardware through a combination of several global
acquisitions and by developing products internally to further meet the needs of its customers.

Integra employs approximately 4,500 people dedicated to limiting uncertainty for surgeons, so that they can
concentrate on providing the best care for their patients. Integra provides innovative healthcare solutions in more
than 130 countries through its nearly 50 offices and its worldwide distribution network.

VISION

We aspire to be a worldwide leader in neurosurgery & reconstructive surgery, with a portfolio of leading
businesses that delivers outstanding customer experience through innovation, execution and teamwork to
positively impact the lives of millions of patients and families.

STRATEGY

Integra is committed to delivering high quality products that positively impact the lives of millions of
patients and their families. We focus on four key pillars: 1) building an execution-focused culture, 2) achieving
relevant scale, 3) improving agility and innovation, and 4) leading in customer excellence. We believe that by
sharpening our focus on these areas through improved planning and communication, optimization of our
infrastructure, and strategically aligned tuck-in acquisitions, we can build scale, increase competitiveness and
achieve our long-term goals.

To this end, our executive leadership team has established the following key priorities aligned to this

strategy:

Strategic Acquisitions. An important part of our strategy is pursuing strategic transactions and licensing
agreements that increase relevant scale in the clinical areas in which we compete. In 2018, integrating the
Codman Neurosurgery business, which was acquired from Johnson and Johnson in the previous year, remained a
top priority and we will continue to transition the business throughout 2019. This acquisition expanded our
portfolio of neurosurgery products and established us as the world leader in neurosurgery. It has also enabled us
to bring our entire Integra portfolio to a global market.

Portfolio Optimization and New Product Introductions. We are investing in innovative product development
to drive a multi-generational pipeline for our key product franchises. Our product development efforts focus on
regenerative technologies and other projects with the potential for significant returns on investment. In 2018, we
achieved significant milestones in research and development by successfully launching nine new products. In
addition to new product development, we are funding studies to gather clinical evidence to support launches,
ensure market access and improve reimbursement for existing products. We also continue to identify low-growth,
low-margin products and product franchises for discontinuation and will continue to look at other ways of
optimizing our portfolio.

1

Commercial Channel Investments. With acquisitions, new product introductions and a broader portfolio of
products, investing in our sales channels is a core part of our strategy to create specialization and greater focus on
reaching our customers and addressing their needs. Internationally, we have increased our commercial resources
significantly in almost all markets and are making investments to support our sales organization and maximize
our commercial opportunities. We now have a strong international sales channel that will deliver our current
portfolio as well as position us for expansion. In addition, we continue to build upon our leadership brands across
our product franchises to enable us to engage hospital systems through enterprise-wide contracts.

Customer Excellence. We aspire to be ranked as a best-in-class provider and are committed to strengthening
our relationships with all of our customers. We strive to consistently deliver outstanding customer service and
continue to invest in technologies, systems and processes to improve the way our customers do business with us.
Additionally, we expect to build on the success of our professional education programs to drive continued
customer appreciation of our growing portfolio of medical technologies globally.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

We currently manufacture and sell our products in the following two global reportable business segments:
Codman Specialty Surgical and Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies. We include financial
information
regarding our reportable business segments and certain geographic information under “Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 16, Segment and
Geographic Information to our consolidated financial statements.

Codman Specialty Surgical

Our Codman Specialty Surgical business offers global, neurosurgery market-leading technologies,
brands and instrumentation. The product portfolio represents a continuum of care from pre-operative, to the
neurosurgery operating room, to the neuro-critical care unit and post care for both adult and pediatric
patients suffering from brain tumors, brain injury, cerebrospinal fluid pressure complications and other
neurological conditions.

The acquisition of Codman Neurosurgery from Johnson & Johnson increased our global direct sales
representation and commercial presence. This acquisition expanded the product portfolio of our well known,
leading technologies in dural repair, ultrasonic tissue ablation, intracranial pressure (“ICP”) monitoring,
hydrocephalus management, and cranial stabilization systems, while providing a rich research and
development pipeline for growth.

Rounding out the portfolio is a catalog of surgical headlamps, surgical instrumentation, as well as asset
instrument
management software and support, and after-market service. With thousands of surgical
products, including specialty surgical instruments, we call on the central sterile processing unit of hospitals
and acute care surgical centers. Additionally, through a strong U.S. distribution model, we can serve the
needs of hundreds of physicians, dental and veterinary offices.

Our global commercial network includes clinical specialists, a large direct global sales force and
strategic partnerships and distributors that serve hospitals, integrated health networks, group purchasing
organizations, clinicians, surgery centers and health care providers.

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies products serve some of the fastest growing markets in the
medical technology industry and provide solutions that primarily address the needs of orthopedic, plastic,
reconstructive and general surgeons. These products focus on addressing soft tissue, nerve, and tendon
repairs as well as reconstruction in the hand, wrist, elbow, shoulder, ankle and foot.

2

We provide regenerative technology solutions for the treatment of acute wounds, such as burns,
chronic wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers, surgical tissue repair including hernia repair, peripheral
nerve repair and protection, and tendon repair. For extremity bone and joint reconstruction procedures, we
sell hardware products, such as bone and joint fixation and joint replacement devices, implants and
instruments, which provide for the reconstruction of bone in the hand, wrist, elbow and shoulder (Upper
Extremity), and the foot, ankle and leg below the knee (Lower Extremity). In addition, we created
opportunities to further expand our presence in the plastic and reconstructive surgery segments with our
advanced wound care products such as Medihoney ®, weight offloading, and amniotic tissue.

We made significant investments over the last two years with our channel expansion in the U.S. and
created four dedicated sales channels to have more focus and specialization within our call points to drive
sustainable growth. We have a specialized sales organization composed of directly employed sales
representatives, as well as specialty distributors, organized based upon their call point. Our extremity
orthopedics sales representatives call on surgeons who treat extremity orthopedic disorders, including
osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, wrist, ankle and shoulder arthroplasty, and other conditions requiring
foot or hand reconstruction. Additionally, we sell our shoulder products through a specialty distributor
network of sales agents who call on shoulder surgeons. Our wound reconstruction acute (inpatient) sales
representatives call on surgeons doing procedures in limb salvage, trauma, wound reconstruction and burns,
while our advanced wound care sales representatives call on physicians who treat chronic wounds in the
outpatient wound care clinic setting. We also have a dedicated surgical reconstruction sales team focused on
plastic and reconstructive surgery and hernia procedures with differentiated products. Finally, we have a
distributor network focused on biologics.

Outside the U.S., we have a small direct sales presence, primarily in certain European countries,
Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, and use distributors in other international markets to sell certain
product lines.

This business segment also includes private-label sales of a broad set of our regenerative and wound
care technologies. Our customers are other medical technology companies that sell to end markets primarily
in orthopedics, spine, surgical and wound care.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Our research and development activities focus on identifying unmet surgical needs and addressing those
needs with innovative solutions and products. We apply our core competency in regenerative technology to
products for neurosurgical, orthopedic and wound applications, and we have extensive programs for our core
platforms of orthopedic hardware and electromechanical
technologies. We are focusing our research and
development efforts on products and clinical studies to generate efficacy and health economic evidence.

Regenerative Technologies. Integra was the first and only company to receive a United States Food and
Drug Administration (“FDA”) claim for regeneration of dermal tissue and is a world leader in regenerative
technology. Because regenerative technology products represent a fast-growing, high-margin opportunity for us,
to these projects. Our regenerative
we allocate a large portion of our research and development budget
technology development program applies our expertise in bioengineering to a range of biomaterials including
natural collagen and human tissues as well as synthetics such as polymers. These unique product designs are used
for neurosurgical and orthopedic surgical applications, as well as dermal regeneration, including the healing of
chronic and acute wounds, tendon and nerve repair. Our regenerative technology platform includes our legacy
Integra ® Dermal Regeneration Template (IDRT) products and complementary technologies that we have
acquired over the last few years. Our collagen manufacturing capability, combined with our history of
innovation, provides us with strong platform technologies for multiple indications. In 2017 and 2018, we
introduced ten new regenerative technology products, including SurgiMend MP to address Abdominal Hernias,
SurgiMend PRS for plastic and reconstructive surgery, AmnioExcel Plus and new sizes of PriMatrix ® and
Omnigraft for treatment of wounds.

3

Orthopedic Reconstruction. We develop fixation and small joint reconstruction implants and instruments for
upper and lower extremities to both provide next generation solutions and expand our product portfolio. This
portfolio focuses on joint replacement products. Integra has a strong shoulder portfolio, which includes a total
shoulder system and a reverse shoulder. We continue to work on advanced shoulder products and are developing
next generation anatomical designs, bone preserving products and techniques, and a pyrocarbon shoulder
hemiarthroplasty product to add to that portfolio. We have a strong differentiated asset that resides in our
patented pyrocarbon products, and we continue to invest to bring new products to market with this technology,
which has shown significantly less wear on bone than traditional metals. To expand our ankle offering, we
launched the Integra ® XT Ankle Revision System which may be used to revise most ankle prosthesis currently
in the market. The non-randomized, prospective, multi-center post-market studies we launched in 2017 in the
U.S., Europe and Canada to evaluate 2-year implant survivorship in subjects who received the Cadence ® Total
Ankle System for primary ankle arthroplasty is progressing and will further evaluate implant survivorship at
5 and 10 years post-operatively.

Electromechanical Technologies and Instrumentation. Because our electromechanical products and
instruments address significant needs in surgical procedures and limit uncertainty for surgeons, we continue to
invest in approvals for new indications and next generation improvements to our market-leading products. We
have several active programs focused on life cycle management and innovation, for capital and disposable
products in our portfolio. Our product development efforts are focused on core clinical applications in cerebral
spinal fluid (CSF) management, neuro-critical care (NCC) monitoring, minimally invasive instruments and
electrosurgery and ultrasonic medical technologies. We also work with several instrument partners to bring new
surgical instrument patterns to the market, enabling us to add new instruments with minimal expense. Finally,
our lighting franchise is among the most dynamic in the industry, and we continue to invest in ongoing
development in LED technology.

COMPETITION

Our competitors for Codman Specialty Surgical are the Aesculap division of B. Braun Medical, Inc.,
Medtronic, Inc., Stryker Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company. In addition, we compete with many
smaller specialized companies and larger companies that do not otherwise focus on the offerings that Codman
Specialty Surgical technologies does. We rely on the depth and breadth of our sales and marketing organization,
our innovative technology, and our procurement and manufacturing operations to maintain our competitive
position.

Our competition in Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies includes the DePuy/Synthes business of
Johnson & Johnson, ACell, Inc., Stryker Corporation, Wright Medical Group, N.V., Smith & Nephew plc,
MiMedx Group, Inc., LifeCell Corporation, a subsidiary of Allergan PLC, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., as
well as other major orthopedic companies that carry a full line of small bone and joint fixation and soft tissue
products.

Finally, in certain cases our products compete primarily against medical practices that treat a condition
without using a medical device or any particular product, such as medical practices that utilize autograft tissue
instead of our dermal regeneration products, duraplasty products and nerve repair products. Depending on the
product
line, we compete based on our products’ features, strength of our sales force or distributors,
sophistication of our technology and cost effectiveness of our solution.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

We are a manufacturer and marketer of medical devices, and therefore are subject to extensive regulation by
the FDA, the Center for Medicare Services of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, other federal
governmental agencies and,
in some jurisdictions, by state and foreign governmental authorities. These
regulations govern the introduction of new medical devices, the observance of certain standards with respect to

4

the design, manufacture, testing, labeling, promotion and sales of the devices, the maintenance of certain records,
the ability to track devices, the reporting of potential product defects, the import and export of devices, and other
matters.

United States Food and Drug Administration

The regulatory process for obtaining product approvals and clearances can be onerous and costly. The FDA
requires, as a condition to marketing a medical device in the U.S., that we secure a Premarket Notification
clearance pursuant to Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) or an
approved PMA application (or supplemental PMA application). Obtaining these approvals and clearances can
take up to several years and may involve preclinical studies and clinical trials. The FDA also may require a post-
approval clinical study as a condition of approval. To perform clinical trials for significant risk devices in the
U.S. on an unapproved product, we are required to obtain an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) from the
FDA. The FDA may also require a filing for approval prior to marketing products that are modifications of
existing products or new indications for existing products. Moreover, after clearance/approval is given, if the
product is shown to be hazardous or defective, the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies have the power to
withdraw the clearance or approval, as the case may be, or require us to change the device, its manufacturing
process or its labeling, to supply additional proof of its safety and effectiveness or to recall, repair, replace or
refund the cost of the medical device. Because we currently export medical devices manufactured in the U.S. that
have not been approved by the FDA for distribution in the U.S., we are required to obtain approval/registration in
the country to which we are exporting and maintain certain records relating to exports and make these available
to the FDA for inspection, if required.

Human Cells, Tissues and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products

Integra, through the acquisition of Derma Sciences and BioD LLC (“BioD”) is involved with the recovery,
processing, storage, transportation and distribution of donated amniotic tissue. The FDA has specific regulations
governing human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product
containing, or consisting of, human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. Examples
include bone, ligament, skin and cornea.

Some HCT/Ps fall within the definition of a biological product, medical device or drug regulated under the
FD&C Act. These biologic, device or drug HCT/Ps must comply both with the requirements exclusively
applicable to HCT/Ps and, in addition, with requirements applicable to biologics, devices or drugs, including
premarket clearance or approval from the FDA.

Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (“Section 361”), authorizes the FDA to issue regulations to
prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of communicable disease. HCT/Ps regulated as “361” HCT/Ps
are subject to requirements relating to registering facilities and listing products with the FDA, screening and
testing for tissue donor eligibility, and Good Tissue Practice when processing, storing, labeling, and distributing
HCT/Ps, including required labeling information, stringent record keeping, and adverse event reporting.

The American Association of Tissue Banks (“AATB”) has issued operating standards for tissue banking.
Compliance with these standards is a requirement in order to become an AATB-accredited tissue establishment.
In addition, some states have their own tissue banking regulations. We are licensed or have permits for tissue
banking in California, Florida, New York and Maryland.

National Organ Transplant Act. Procurement of certain human organs and tissue for transplantation is
subject to the restrictions of the National Organ Transplant Act, which prohibits the transfer of certain human
organs,
including skin and related tissue for valuable consideration, but permits the reasonable payment
associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of
human tissue and skin. Our subsidiary, BioD LLC is a registered Tissue Bank and is involved with the recovery,
storage and transportation of donated human amniotic tissue.

5

Amniotic tissue is considered an HCT/P. However, on June 22, 2015, the FDA issued an Untitled Letter
alleging that BioD’s morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products do not meet the criteria for regulation
as HCT/Ps solely under Section 361 and that, as a result, BioD would need a biologics license to lawfully market
those morselized products. Since the issuance of the Untitled Letter, BioD and more recently the Company have
been in discussions with the FDA to communicate their disagreement with the FDA’s assertion that certain
products are more than minimally manipulated. The FDA has not changed its position that certain of the BioD
acquired products are not eligible for marketing solely under Section 361. In November 2017, the FDA issued the
final guidance document related to human tissue titled, “Regulatory Considerations for Human Cells, Tissues,
and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and Homologous Use” (the “HCT/P Final
Guidance”). The HCT/P Final Guidance maintains the FDA’s position that products such as the Company’s
morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products do not meet the criteria for regulation solely as HCT/Ps. In
addition, the FDA articulated a risk-based approach to enforcement and, while some uses for amniotic membrane
tissue-based products would enjoy as much as thirty-six months of enforcement discretion, other high-risk uses
could be subject to immediate enforcement action. The Company does not believe the uses for its amniotic
membrane tissue-based products fall into the high risk category. As of February 26, 2019, the Company has not
received any further notice of enforcement action from the FDA regarding its morselized amniotic tissue-based
products. Revenues from BioD morselized amniotic membrane-based products for the year ended December 31,
2018 were less than 1.0% of consolidated revenues. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Certain of our products are
derived from human tissue and are subject to additional regulations and requirements. ”

Medical Device Regulations

We also are required to register with the FDA as a medical device manufacturer. As such, our
manufacturing sites are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System
Regulations. These regulations require that we manufacture our products and maintain our documents in a
prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing and control activities. Further, we are required
to comply with various FDA requirements and other legal requirements for labeling and promotion. If the FDA
believes that a company is not in compliance with applicable regulations, it may issue a warning letter, institute
proceedings to detain or seize products, issue a recall order, impose operating restrictions, enjoin future
violations and assess civil penalties against that company, its officers or its employees and may recommend
criminal prosecution to the U.S. Department of Justice.

is not

Medical device regulations also are in effect in many of the countries in which we do business outside the
U.S. These laws range from comprehensive medical device approval and Quality System requirements for some
or all of our medical device products to simpler requests for product data or certifications. Under the European
Union Medical Device Directive, medical devices must meet the Medical Device Directive standards and receive
CE Mark Certification prior to marketing in the European Union (the “EU”). In addition, the EU enacted the EU
Medical Device Regulation, which imposes stricter requirements on the marketing and sales of medical devices
which includes but
limited to quality systems and labeling. CE Mark Certification requires a
comprehensive quality system program, technical documentation, clinical evaluation and data on the product,
which are then reviewed by a Notified Body. A Notified Body is an organization designated by the national
governments of the EU member states to make independent judgments about whether a product complies with
the requirements established by each CE marking directive. The Medical Device Directive, Medical Device
Regulation, ISO 9000 series and ISO 13485 are recognized international quality standards that are designed to
ensure that we develop and manufacture quality medical devices. Other countries are also instituting regulations
regarding medical devices or interpreting and enforcing existing regulations more strictly. Compliance with these
regulations requires extensive documentation and clinical reports for all of our products, revisions to labeling,
and other requirements such as facility inspections to comply with the registration requirements. A recognized
Notified Body audits our facilities annually to verify our compliance with the ISO 13485 Quality System
standard.

Certain countries, as well as the EU, have issued regulations that govern products that contain materials
derived from animal sources. Regulatory authorities are particularly concerned with materials infected with the

6

agent that causes bovine spongiform encephalopathy (“BSE”), otherwise known as mad cow disease. These
regulations affect our dermal regeneration products, duraplasty products, hernia repair products, biomaterial
products for the spine, nerve and tendon repair products and certain other products, all of which contain material
derived from bovine tissue. Although we take great care to provide that our products are safe and free of agents
that can cause disease, products that contain materials derived from animals, including our products, may become
subject to additional regulation, or even be banned in certain countries, because of concern over the potential for
prion transmission. Significant new regulations, a ban of our products, or a movement away from bovine-derived
products because of an outbreak of BSE could have a material, adverse effect on our current business or our
ability to expand our business. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Certain of our products contain materials derived
from animal sources and may become subject to additional regulation.”

the design,

Postmarket Requirements. After a device is cleared or approved for commercial distribution, numerous
regulatory requirements apply. These include the FDA Quality System Regulations which cover the procedures
and documentation of
labeling, packaging,
sterilization, storage and shipping of medical devices; the FDA’s general prohibition against promoting products
for unapproved or ‘off-label’ uses; the Medical Device Reporting regulation, which requires that manufacturers
report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in
a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; and the Reports of
Corrections and Removals regulation, which require manufacturers to report recalls and field corrective actions
to the FDA if initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FD&C Act.

testing, production, control, quality assurance,

Other regulations

Anti-Bribery Laws. In the U.S., we are subject to laws and regulations pertaining to healthcare fraud and
abuse, including anti-kickback laws and physician self-referral laws that regulate the means by which companies
in the health care industry may market their products to hospitals and health care professionals and may compete
by discounting the prices of their products. Similar anti-bribery laws exist in many of the countries in which we
sell our products outside the U.S., as well as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (which addresses
the activities of U.S. companies in foreign markets). Our products also are subject to regulation regarding
reimbursement, and U.S. healthcare laws apply when a customer submits a claim for a product that is reimbursed
under a federally funded healthcare program. These global laws require that we exercise care in designing our
sales and marketing practices, including involving interactions with healthcare professionals, and customer
discount arrangements. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the
manner in which we may sell medical devices and compete in the marketplace.”

Import-export. Our international operations subject us to laws regarding sanctioned countries, entities and
persons, customs, and import-export. Among other things, these laws restrict, and in some cases can prevent,
U.S. companies from directly or indirectly selling goods, technology or services to people or entities in certain
countries. In addition, these laws require that we exercise care in our business dealings with entities in and from
foreign countries.

Hazardous materials. Our research, development and manufacturing processes involve the controlled use of
certain hazardous materials. We are subject to country-specific, federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and certain waste products. We
believe that our environmental, health and safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials
comply with the standards prescribed by the controlling laws and regulations. However, risk of accidental
releases or injury from these materials is possible. These risks are managed to minimize or eliminate associated
business impacts. In the event of this type of accident, we could be held liable for damages that may result, and
any liability could exceed our resources. We could be subject to a regulatory shutdown of a facility that could
prevent the distribution and sale of products manufactured there for a significant period of time, and we could
suffer a casualty loss that could require a shutdown of the facility in order to repair it, any of which could have a
material, adverse effect on our business. Although we continuously strive to maintain full compliance with

7

respect to all applicable global environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could incur substantial
costs to fully comply with future laws and regulations, and our operations, business or assets may be negatively
affected. Furthermore, global environmental, health and safety compliance is an ongoing process. Integra has
compliance procedures in place for compliance with Employee Health & Safety laws, driven by a centrally led
organizational structure that ensures proper implementation, which is essential to our overall business objectives.

In addition to the above regulations, we are, and may be, subject to regulation under country-specific federal
and state laws, including, but not limited to, requirements regarding record keeping, and the maintenance of
personal information, including personal health information. As a public company, we are subject to the
securities laws and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We also are subject to other present
and could be subject to possible future, local, state, federal and foreign regulations.

Third-Party Reimbursement. Healthcare providers that purchase medical devices generally rely on third-
party payors, including, in the U.S., the Medicare and Medicaid programs and private payors, such as indemnity
insurers, employer group health insurance programs and managed care plans, to reimburse all or part of the cost
of the products. As a result, demand for our products is and will continue to be dependent in part on the coverage
and reimbursement policies of these payors. The manner in which reimbursement is sought and obtained varies
based upon the type of payor involved and the setting in which the product
is furnished and utilized.
Reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors may be subject to periodic adjustments as
a result of legislative, regulatory and policy changes, as well as budgetary pressures. Possible reductions in, or
eliminations of, coverage or reimbursement by third-party payors, or denial of, or provision of uneconomical
reimbursement for new products may affect our customers’ revenue and ability to purchase our products. Any
changes in the healthcare regulatory, payment or enforcement landscape relative to our customers’ healthcare
services have the potential to significantly affect our operations and revenue.

Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Laws and Regulations. As a business with a significant global footprint,
compliance with evolving regulations and standards in data privacy and cybersecurity (relating to the
confidentiality and security of our information technology systems, products such as medical devices, and other
services provided by us) may result in increased costs, lower revenue, new complexities in compliance, new
challenges for competition, and the threat of increased regulatory enforcement activity. Our business relies on the
secure electronic transmission, storage and hosting of sensitive information, including personal information,
financial
intellectual property, and other sensitive information related to our customers and
workforce.

information,

For example, in the U.S. the collection, maintenance, protection, use, transmission, disclosure and disposal
of certain personal information and the security of medical devices are regulated at the U.S. federal and state, and
industry levels. U.S. federal and state laws protect the confidentiality of certain patient health information,
including patient medical records, and restrict the use and disclosure of patient health information by health care
providers. In addition, the FDA has issued guidance advising manufacturers to take cybersecurity risks into
account in product design for connected medical devices and systems, to assure that appropriate safeguards are in
place to reduce the risk of unauthorized access or modification to medical devices that contain software and
reduce the risk of introducing threats into hospital systems that are connected to such devices. The FDA also
issued guidance on post market management of cyber security in medical devices.

Outside the U.S., we are impacted by the privacy and data security requirements at the international,
national and regional level, and on an industry specific basis. Legal requirements in these countries relating to the
collection, storage, handling and transfer of personal data and, potentially, intellectual property continue to
evolve with increasingly strict enforcement regimes. In Europe, for example, we are subject to the EU data
protection regulations, including the current EU Directive on Data Protection, which requires member states to
impose minimum restrictions on the collection, use and transfer of personal data. A new EU General Data
Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) which became enforceable in May 2018 includes, among other things, a
requirement for prompt notice of data breaches to data subjects and supervisory authorities in certain

8

circumstances and significant fines for non-compliance. The GDPR also requires companies processing personal
data of individuals residing in the EU to comply with EU privacy and data protection rules.

These laws and regulations impact the ways in which we use and manage personal data, protected health
information, and our information technology systems. They also impact our ability to move, store, and access
data across geographic boundaries. Compliance with these requirements may require changes in business
practices, complicate our operations, and add complexity and additional management and oversight needs. They
also may complicate our clinical research activities, as well as product offerings that involve transmission or use
of clinical data.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

We seek patent and trademark protection for our key technology, products and product improvements, both
in the U.S. and in selected foreign countries. When determined appropriate, we have enforced and plan to
continue to enforce and defend our patent and trademark rights. In general, however, we do not rely solely on our
patent and trademark estate to provide us with any significant competitive advantages as it relates to our existing
product lines. We also rely upon trade secrets and continuing technological innovations to develop and maintain
our competitive position. In an effort to protect our trade secrets, we have a policy of requiring our employees,
consultants and advisors to execute proprietary information and invention assignment agreements upon
commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements also provide that all
confidential information developed or made known to the individual during the course of their relationship with
us must be kept confidential, except in specified circumstances.

AccuDrain ®, AmnioExcel ®, AmnioMatrix ®, BioDFactor ®, BioDFence ®, BioDOptix ®, BioDRestore™,
Bioguard ®, BioMotion ®, Bold ®, Budde ®, Buzz™, Cadence ®, Capture™, Codman ®, Codman Certas ®,
Codman VersaTru ®, CRW ®, CUSA ®, DigiFuse ®, DirectLink ®, DuraGen ®, DuraSeal ®, First Choice ®, Hallu
®, HeliCote ®, HeliPlug ®, HeliTape ®, HeliMend ®, Helistat ®, Helitene ®, Integra ®, IntegraLink ®, IPP-ON ®,
Isocool ®, Jarit ®, Licox ®, LimiTorr™, Luxtec ®, MediHoney ®, MemoFix ®, MicroFrance ®, Miltex ®,
Movement ®, NeuraGen ®, NeuraWrap™, NuGrip ®, Omnigraft ®, Omni-Tract ®, OSV II ®, Qwix ®, Padgett ®,
Panta ®, PriMatrix ®, PyroSphere ®, Redmond™, Ruggles ®, SafeGuard ®, Salto Talaris ®, Subtalar MBA ®,
SurgiMend ®, TCC-EZ ®, TenoGlide ®, Ti6 ®, Tibiaxys ®, TissueMend ®, Titan™, TruArch ®, Uni-CP ®, Uni-
Clip ®, Xtrasorb ® and the Integra logo are some of the material trademarks of Integra LifeSciences Corporation
and its subsidiaries. MAYFIELD ® is a registered trademark of SM USA, Inc., and is used by Integra under
license.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2018, we had approximately 4,500 employees engaged in production and production
support for warehouse, engineering and facilities, quality assurance, quality control, research and development,
regulatory and clinical affairs, sales, marketing, administration and finance. Except for certain employees at our
facilities in Austria, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy and Mexico, none of our employees are subject to a
collective bargaining agreement.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

Financial information about our geographical areas is set forth under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Geographic Product Revenues and Operations”
and in our financial statements Note 16, Segment and Geographic Information, to our consolidated financial
statements.

SOURCES OF RAW MATERIALS

In general, raw materials essential to our businesses are readily available from multiple sources. For reasons
of quality assurance, availability, or cost effectiveness, certain components and raw materials are available only

9

from a sole supplier. Our policy is to maintain sufficient inventory of components so that our production will not
be significantly disrupted even if a particular component or material is not available for a period of time.

Certain of our products, including our dermal regeneration products, duraplasty products, wound care
products, bone void fillers, nerve and tendon repair products and certain other products, contain material derived
from bovine tissue. We take great care to provide that our products are safe and free of agents that can cause
disease. In particular, the collagen used in the products that Integra manufactures is derived either from the deep
flexor tendon of cattle less than 24 months old from New Zealand, a country that has never had a reported case of
bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or from the U.S. or from fetal bovine dermis. The World Health
Organization classifies different types of cattle tissue for relative risk of BSE transmission. Deep flexor tendon
and fetal bovine skin are in the lowest-risk category for BSE transmission, and is therefore considered to have a
negligible risk of containing the agent that causes BSE.

SEASONALITY

Revenues during our fourth quarter tend to be stronger than other quarters because many hospitals increase
their purchases of our products during the fourth quarter to coincide with the end of their budget cycles in the
U.S. In general, our first quarter usually has lower revenues than the preceding fourth quarter, the second and
third quarters have higher revenues than the first quarter, and the fourth quarter revenues are the highest in the
year. The main exceptions to this pattern occur because of material intervening acquisitions.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the
“Exchange Act”). In accordance with the Exchange Act, we file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may view our financial
information, including the information contained in this report, and other reports we file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, on the Internet, without charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the “SEC Filings” page of the Investor Relations section of our
website at www.integralife.com. You may also obtain a copy of any of these reports, without charge, from our
Investor Relations department, 311 Enterprise Drive, Plainsboro, NJ 08536. Alternatively, you may view or
obtain reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the SEC Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E. in Washington, D.C. 20549, or at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Internet site at
www.sec.gov. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information
on the operation of the public reference facilities.

10

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have made statements in this report, including statements under “Business” and “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),
and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks,
uncertainties and assumptions about us including, among other things:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in our international markets;

our expectations and estimates concerning future financial performance, financing plans and the impact
of competition;

anticipated trends in our business;

anticipated demand for our products, particularly capital equipment;

our ability to produce regenerative-based products in sufficient quantities to meet sales demands;

our expectations concerning our ongoing restructuring, integration and manufacturing transfer and
expansion activities;

existing and future regulations affecting our business, and enforcement of those regulations;

our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing to fund capital expenditures, working capital
requirements and acquisitions;

physicians’ willingness to adopt our recently launched and planned products, third-party payors’
willingness to provide or continue reimbursement for any of our products and our ability to secure
regulatory approval for products in development;

initiatives launched by our competitors;

our ability to protect our intellectual property, including trade secrets;

our ability to complete acquisitions, integrate operations post-acquisition and maintain relationships
with customers of acquired entities;

our ability to remediate all matters identified in FDA observations and warning letters that we received
or may receive; and

other risk factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this report.

You can identify these forward-looking statements by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “may,”
“could,” “might,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “expect,” “should,”
“would” and similar expressions in this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these
risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur and
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

11

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Business

Our operating results may fluctuate.

Our operating results, including components of operating results such as gross margin and cost of product
sales, may fluctuate from time to time, and such fluctuations could affect our stock price. Our operating results
have fluctuated in the past and can be expected to fluctuate from time to time in the future. Some of the factors
that may cause these fluctuations include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

economic conditions worldwide, which could affect the ability of hospitals and other customers to
purchase our products and could result in a reduction in elective and non-reimbursed operative
procedures;

the impact of acquisitions and our ability to integrate acquisitions;

the impact of our restructuring activities;

expenditures for major
restructuring;

initiatives,

including acquired businesses and integrations thereof and

the timing of significant customer orders, which tend to increase in the fourth quarter to coincide with
the end of budget cycles for many hospitals;

increased competition for a wide range of customers across all our product lines in the markets our
products are sold;

• market acceptance of our existing products, as well as products in development;

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

the timing of regulatory approvals as well as changes in country-specific regulatory requirements;

changes in the rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and other currencies of foreign countries in
which we do business;

changes in the variable interest rates of our debt
requirements;

instruments which could impact debt service

potential backorders, lost sales and expenses incurred in connection with product recalls or field
corrective actions;

disruption of our operations and sales resulting from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters
that damage our manufacturing or distribution facilities, the suppliers and service providers for those
facilities, or the infrastructure in the locations of those facilities;

our ability to manufacture and ship our products efficiently or in sufficient quantities to meet sales
demands;

changes in the cost or decreases in the supply of raw materials, including energy, steel, pyrocarbon and
honey;

the timing of our research and development expenditures;

reimbursement for our products by third-party payors such as Medicare, Medicaid, private and public
health insurers and foreign governmental health systems;

the ability to maintain existing distribution rights to and from certain third parties;

the ability to maintain business if or when we opt to convert such business from distributors to a direct
sales model;

the ability of our new commercial sales representatives to obtain sales targets in a reasonable time
frame;

12

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

the impact of changes to our sales organization, including channel expansion in the U.S. and increased
specialization;

peer-reviewed publications discussing the clinical effectiveness of the products we sell;

inspections of our manufacturing facilities for compliance with Quality System Regulations (Good
Manufacturing Practices) which could result in Form 483 observations, warning letters, injunctions or
other adverse findings from the FDA or from equivalent regulatory bodies, and corrective actions,
procedural changes and other actions that we determine are necessary or appropriate to address the
results of those inspections, any of which may affect production and our ability to supply our customers
with our products;

changes in regulations or guidelines that impact the sales and marketing practices for products that we
sell;

the increased regulatory scrutiny of certain of our products, including products which we manufacture
for others, could result in their being removed from the market or involve field corrective actions that
could affect the marketability of our products;

enforcement or defense of intellectual property rights;

changes in tax laws, or their interpretations; and

the impact of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges if future operating results of the
acquired businesses are significantly less than the results anticipated at the time of the acquisitions.

The industry and market segments in which we operate are highly competitive, and we may be unable to
compete effectively with other companies.

There is intense competition among medical device companies. We compete with established medical
technology companies in many of our product areas. Competition also comes from early-stage companies that
targets, as well as universities, research
have alternative technological solutions for our primary clinical
institutions and other non-profit entities. In certain cases, our products compete primarily against medical
practices that treat a condition without using a device or any particular product, such as the medical practices that
use autograft tissue instead of our dermal regeneration products, duraplasty products and nerve repair products,
or that use other technologies that cost less than our products. Many of our competitors have access to greater
financial, technical, research and development, marketing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, administrative,
consulting and other resources than we do. Our competitors may be more effective at developing commercial
products. Our competitors may be able to gain market share by offering lower-cost products or by offering
products that enjoy better reimbursement from third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid, private and
public health insurers and foreign governmental health systems.

implement production and marketing plans, secure regulatory approval

Our competitive position depends on our ability to achieve market acceptance for our products, develop new
products,
for products under
development, obtain and maintain reimbursement coverage under Medicare, Medicaid, private and public health
insurers and foreign governmental health systems, obtain patent protection and produce products consistently in
sufficient quantities to meet demand. We may need to develop new applications for our products to remain
competitive. Technological advances by one or more of our current or future competitors or their achievement of
superior reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid, private and public health insurers and foreign governmental
health systems could render our present or future products obsolete or uneconomical. Our future success will
depend upon our ability to compete effectively against current technology as well as to respond effectively to
technological advances, changes in customers’ requirements, or changes in payor or regulatory evidence
requirements. Additionally, purchasing decisions of our customers may be based on clinical evidence or
comparative effectiveness studies and, because of our vast array of products, we might not be able to fund the
studies necessary to gain entry or maintain our position or provide the required information to compete

13

effectively. Other companies may have more resources available to fund such studies. For example, competitors
have launched and have been developing products to compete with our dural repair products, extremity
reconstruction implants, regenerative skin, neuro critical care monitors and ultrasonic tissue ablation devices,
among others. Further, in the current environment of managed care, consolidation among health care providers,
increased competition, and declining reimbursement rates, we have been increasingly required to compete on the
basis of price. Competitive pressures could adversely affect our profitability. Given these factors, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to compete effectively or continue our level of success in the areas in which we
compete.

If there is a determination that the spin-off of SeaSpine is taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
then we and our stockholders that are subject to U.S. federal income tax could incur significant U.S. federal
income tax liabilities and, in certain circumstances, we could be required to indemnify SeaSpine for
material taxes pursuant to indemnification obligations under the tax matters agreement.

On July 1, 2015, we completed the separation (the “Separation”) of our orthobiologics and spinal fusion
hardware business, now known as SeaSpine Holdings Corporation (“SeaSpine”), from the Company. We
received an opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP, tax counsel to us (the “Tax Opinion”), substantially to the effect
that (i) the contribution of the stock of SeaSpine Orthopedics Corporation to SeaSpine, together with the internal
distribution of the stock of SeaSpine to Integra (collectively, the “internal distribution”), will constitute a
reorganization under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”) and (ii) the contribution of cash from us to SeaSpine (the “cash contribution”), together with the
distribution of the stock of SeaSpine to our shareholders (the “distribution”), will constitute a reorganization
under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Based on this tax treatment, the distribution will be tax-free to
Integra and its stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes (except for any cash received in lieu of
fractional shares). The Tax Opinion relied on certain facts, assumptions, representations and undertakings from
us and SeaSpine regarding the past and future conduct of the companies’ respective businesses and other matters.
The Tax Opinion is not binding on the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or the courts. Notwithstanding
the opinion, the IRS could determine on audit that the internal distribution, the cash contribution and the
distribution should be treated as taxable transactions if it determines that any of the facts, assumptions,
representations or undertakings we or SeaSpine have made is not correct or has been violated, or that the internal
distribution, the cash contribution and the distribution should be taxable for other reasons, including as a result of
a significant change in stock or asset ownership after the distribution. If the distribution ultimately is determined
to be taxable, the distribution could be treated as a taxable dividend or capital gain to our stockholders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, and our stockholders could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities.
In addition, we would recognize gain in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of
SeaSpine common stock distributed to our stockholders on the distribution date over our tax basis in such shares
of SeaSpine common stock. Moreover, we could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities if it is
is tax-free for
ultimately determined that
U.S. federal income tax purposes.

the internal distribution does not qualify as a transaction that

We may be subject to continuing contingent liabilities of SeaSpine following the spin-off.

After the Separation, there are several significant areas where the liabilities of SeaSpine may become our
obligations. For example, under the Code and the related rules and regulations, each corporation that was a
member of our consolidated U.S. federal income tax reporting group during any taxable period or portion of any
taxable period ending on or before the effective time of the spin-off is jointly and severally liable for the
U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire consolidated tax reporting group for that taxable period. If SeaSpine
is unable to pay any prior period taxes for which it is responsible, we could be required to pay the entire amount
of such taxes.

14

Our current strategy involves growth through acquisitions, which requires us to incur substantial costs and
potential liabilities for which we may never realize the anticipated benefits.

In addition to internally generated growth, our current strategy involves growth through acquisitions.
Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, we have acquired 3 businesses at a total cost of approximately
$1.2 billion.

We may be unable to continue to implement our growth strategy, and our strategy ultimately may be
unsuccessful. A significant portion of our growth in revenues has resulted from, and is expected to continue to
result from, the acquisition of businesses or products complementary to our own. We engage in evaluations of
potential acquisitions and are in various stages of discussion regarding possible acquisitions, certain of which, if
consummated, could be significant to us. Any new acquisition could result in material transaction expenses,
increased interest and amortization expense, increased depreciation expense, increased operating expense, and
possible in-process research and development charges for acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a
“business,” any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our operating results. Certain businesses that
we acquire may not have adequate financial, disclosure, regulatory, quality or other compliance controls at the
time we acquire them and could require significant expenditures to address those controls or subject us to
increased risk. As we grow by acquisition, we must manage and integrate the new businesses to bring them into
our systems for financial, disclosure, compliance, regulatory and quality control, realize economies of scale, and
control costs. If we cannot integrate acquired businesses and operations, manage the cost of providing our
products or price our products appropriately, our profitability could suffer. In addition, acquisitions involve other
risks, including diversion of management resources otherwise available for the running of our business and the
development of our business as well as risks associated with entering markets in which our marketing teams and
sales force has limited experience or where experienced distribution alliances are not available. Our future
profitability will depend in part upon our ability to develop further our resources to adapt to these new products
or business areas and to identify and enter into or maintain satisfactory distribution networks. Further, as a result
of our acquisitions of other healthcare businesses, we may be subject to the risk of unanticipated business
uncertainties, regulatory and other compliance matters or legal liabilities relating to those acquired businesses for
which the sellers of the acquired businesses may not indemnify us, for which we may not be able to obtain
insurance (or adequate insurance), or for which the indemnification may not be sufficient to cover the ultimate
liabilities. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates in the future, obtain acceptable
financing or consummate any future acquisitions. Certain potential acquisitions are subject to antitrust and
competition laws, which laws could impact our ability to pursue strategic acquisitions and could result in
mandated divestitures. If we are unsuccessful in our acquisition strategy, we may be unable to meet our financial
targets and our financial performance could be materially and adversely affected.

Our future financial results could be adversely affected by impairments or other charges.

Since we have grown through acquisitions, we have $926.4 million of goodwill and $163.1 million of
indefinite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2018. Under the authoritative guidance for determining the
useful life of intangible assets, we are required to test both goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment on an annual basis based upon a fair value approach, rather than amortizing them over time. We are
also required to test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment between annual tests if an
event occurs such as a significant decline in revenues or cash flows for certain products, or the discount rates
used in the calculations of discounted cash flow change significantly, or circumstances change that would more
likely than not reduce our enterprise fair value below its book value. If such a decline, rate change or
circumstance were to materialize, we may record an impairment of these intangible assets that could be material
to the financial statements. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates” of this report.

The guidance on long-lived assets requires that we assess the impairment of our long-lived assets, including
finite-lived intangible assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may

15

not be recoverable as measured by the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows. As of December 31,
2018, we had $916.4 million and $300.1 million of finite-lived intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment, respectively.

At December 31, 2018, our trade names had a carrying value of $241.4 million and decisions relating to our
trade names may occur over time. Additionally, we may discontinue certain products in the future as we continue
to assess the profitability of our product lines. As a result, we may need to record impairment charges or
accelerate amortization on certain trade names or technology-related intangible assets in the future.

The value of a medical device business is often volatile, and the assumptions underlying our estimates made
in connection with our assessments under the guidance may change as a result of that volatility or other factors
outside our control and may result in impairment charges. The amount of any such impairment charges could be
significant and could have a material, adverse effect on our reported financial results for the period in which the
charge is taken and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities, including the notes and the
common stock into which they may be converted.

The adoption of healthcare reform in the U.S. and initiatives sponsored by other governments may
adversely affect our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

Our operations may be substantially affected by potential fundamental changes in the global political,
economic and regulatory landscape of the healthcare industry. Government and private sector initiatives to limit
the growth of healthcare costs are continuing in the U.S., and in many other countries in which we do business,
causing the marketplace to put increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective treatments. These
initiatives
include price regulation, competitive pricing, coverage and payment policies, comparative
effectiveness of therapies, technology assessments and managed-care arrangements. The adoption of some or all
of these initiatives could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), signed into law in March 2010, includes
several provisions that impact our businesses in the U.S. The ACA includes provisions that, among other things,
reduce and/or limit Medicare reimbursement, require all individuals to have health insurance (with limited
exceptions), require detailed disclosure of gifts and other remuneration made to healthcare professionals.
Specifically, commencing on January 1, 2013, the ACA requires the medical device industry to subsidize
healthcare reform by implementing a 2.3% excise tax on the sale of certain medical devices by a manufacturer,
producer or importer of such devices in the U.S. In December 2015, President Obama signed into law The
Consolidated Appropriations Act, which included a two-year moratorium on the excise tax for 2016 and 2017.
On January 22, 2018, President Trump signed into law a funding bill, which extended the moratorium on the
excise tax through December 31, 2019. Unless there is further legislative action during that period, the medical
device excise tax will be reinstated on or after January 1, 2020. While this two-year moratorium on the medical
device excise tax could provide a short-term benefit to the Company in terms of providing additional monies
available to spend on various projects in 2018 and 2019, we are unable to predict what the long-term impact will
have on our financial statements and financial performance.

Since the adoption of the ACA, the law has been challenged before the U.S. Supreme Court, and several
bills have been and may continue to be introduced in Congress to delay, defund or repeal implementation of or
amend significant provisions of the ACA. In addition,
there continues to be ongoing litigation over the
interpretation and implementation of certain provisions of the law. Furthermore, on January 20, 2017, an
executive order was issued that, among other things, stated the intention of the administration to repeal the ACA
and, pending that repeal, instructed the executive branch of the Federal government to defer or delay the
implementation of any provision or requirement of the ACA that would impose a fiscal burden on any state or a
cost, fee, tax or penalty on any individual, family, health care provider, health insurer, or manufacturer of
pharmaceuticals or medical devices. On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act, which eliminates the penalty for individuals who fail to purchase acceptable health insurance starting in

16

2019 and will most likely result in the reduction in the number of insured people in the U.S. We cannot predict
whether the ACA will be repealed, replaced, or further modified, what impact the President’s executive order
will have on the implementation and enforcement of the provisions of the ACA, or what impact the elimination
of the penalty and resulting reduction in the number of insured people in the U.S. will have on the demand and
pricing for our products. In addition, if the ACA is replaced or modified, we cannot predict what the replacement
plan or modifications would be, when the replacement plan or modifications would become effective, or whether
any of the existing provisions of the ACA would remain in place. As a result, while we are unable to predict the
effect of the ACA and the various activities surrounding it on our business, financial condition or results of
operations, changes to this law, or a new law that replaces it, could materially and adversely affect our business
and results of operations.

In addition to the ACA, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MACRA”) repealed
the Sustainable Growth Rate formula used to calculate Medicare payment updates for physicians providing
services to Medicare beneficiaries. In its place, MACRA introduced the Quality Payment Program (“QPP”),
which is a value-based program that focuses on quality and outcomes as a metric for physician reimbursement.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released its final rules for the QPP in October 2016. The QPP,
which impacts more than 600,000 physicians and other practice-based clinicians, represents a fundamental
change in physician reimbursement, transitioning from a system that solely rewards volume of care to one that
also rewards quality and value of care. While the full impact of QPP on physicians’ practices and product
selection decisions will not be fully known until payment adjustments go into effect in 2019, 2017 represented
the first performance measurement year. The program’s increased emphasis on quality and cost of care may
encourage physicians to merge practices or seek direct employment with hospitals. In addition, the ACA
encourages hospitals and physicians to work collaboratively through shared savings programs as well as other
bundled payment initiatives. These shifts could lead to a consolidation of hospital providers into larger delivery
networks with increased price negotiation strength resulting in downward pressure on our selling prices.
Although we believe that we are well positioned to minimize any such impact on our business, our inability to
address the consolidation trend could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Other initiatives sponsored by government agencies, legislative bodies and the private sector to limit the
growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation and competitive pricing, are ongoing in the markets where
we do business. We cannot predict what healthcare programs and regulations will ultimately be implemented at
the U.S. federal or state level or elsewhere, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation in the U.S. or
elsewhere. That said, any changes that lower reimbursements for our products or reduce medical procedure
volumes could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We
continue to monitor the implementation of such legislation and, to the extent new market or industry trends or
new governmental programs evolve, we will consider implementing or implement programs in response.

Changes in the healthcare industry may require us to decrease the selling price for our products, may
reduce the size of the market for our products, or may eliminate a market, any of which could have a
negative impact on our financial performance.

Trends toward managed care, healthcare cost containment and other changes in government and private
sector initiatives in the U.S. and other countries in which we do business are placing increased emphasis on the
delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies that could adversely affect the sale and/or the prices of our
products. For example:

•

•

third-party payors of hospital services and hospital outpatient services, including Medicare, Medicaid,
private and public health insurers and foreign governmental health systems, annually revise their
payment methodologies, which can result in stricter standards for reimbursement of hospital charges
for certain medical procedures or the elimination of reimbursement;

several foreign countries have implemented reforms of their respective healthcare sectors in an effort to
reduce healthcare spending, including restricting funding to only those medical technologies and

17

procedures with proven effectiveness, and increasing patient co-payments. Governmental health
systems have revised and continue to consider revisions of healthcare budgets, which could result in
stricter standards for implementing certain medical procedures, increased scrutiny of medical devices,
and downward pricing pressure;

• Medicare, Medicaid, private and public health insurer and foreign governmental cutbacks could create

downward pricing pressure on our products;

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

in the U.S., Medicare and Medicaid coverage as well as commercial payor coverage determinations
could reduce or eliminate reimbursement or coverage for certain of our wound matrix, amniotic, and
advanced wound dressing products as well as other products in most regions, negatively affecting our
market for these products, and future determinations could reduce or eliminate reimbursement or
coverage for these products in other regions and could reduce or eliminate reimbursement or coverage
for other products;

there has been a consolidation among healthcare facilities and purchasers of medical devices in the
U.S., some of whom prefer to limit the number of suppliers from whom they purchase medical
products, and these entities may decide to stop purchasing our products or demand discounts on our
prices;

there has been a growing movement of physicians becoming employees of hospitals and other
healthcare entities, which aligns surgeon product choices with his or her employers’ purchasing
decisions, and adds to pricing pressures;

in the U.S., we are party to contracts with group purchasing organizations, which negotiate pricing for
many member hospitals, require us to discount our prices for certain of our products and limit our
ability to raise prices for certain of our products, particularly surgical instruments;

there is economic pressure to contain healthcare costs in domestic and international markets, and,
regardless of the consolidation discussed above, providers generally are exploring ways to cut costs by
eliminating purchases or driving reductions in the prices that they pay for medical devices, or
increasing clinical or economic evidence thresholds for product formularies;

there are proposed and existing laws, regulations and industry policies in domestic and international
markets regulating the sales and marketing practices and the pricing and profitability of companies in
the healthcare industry;

proposed laws or regulations may permit hospitals to provide financial incentives to doctors for
reducing hospital costs, will award physician efficiency, and will encourage partnerships with
healthcare service and goods providers to reduce prices; and

there have been initiatives by third-party payors and foreign governmental health systems to challenge
the prices charged for medical products that could affect our ability to sell products on a competitive
basis.

Any and all of the above factors could materially and adversely affect our levels of revenue and our

profitability.

We are subject to stringent domestic and foreign medical device regulation and any adverse regulatory
action may adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

Our products, development activities and manufacturing processes are subject to extensive and rigorous
regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA and comparable foreign agencies. To varying
degrees, each of these agencies monitors and enforces our compliance with laws and regulations governing the
development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of our medical devices. We are also
subject to regulations that may apply to certain of our products that are Drug/Device Combination products or are
considered to be subject to pharmaceutical regulations outside the U.S. The process of obtaining marketing

18

approval or clearance from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies for new products, or for
enhancements or modifications to existing products, could

•

•

•

•

•

take a significant amount of time;

require the expenditure of substantial financial and other resources;

involve rigorous and expensive pre-clinical and clinical testing, as well as increased post-market
surveillance;

involve modifications, repairs or replacements of our products; and

result in limitations on the indicated uses of our products.

We cannot be certain that we will receive required approval or clearance from the FDA and foreign
regulatory agencies for new products or modifications to existing products on a timely basis. The failure to
receive approval or clearance for significant new products or modifications to existing products on a timely basis
could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Both before and after a product is commercially released, we have ongoing responsibilities under FDA and
foreign regulations. For example, we are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, which
mandates that manufacturers of medical devices adhere to certain quality assurance requirements pertaining to,
among other things, validation of manufacturing processes, controls for purchasing product components, and
documentation practices. As another example, the Federal Medical Device Reporting regulation requires us to
provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests that a device may have
caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or, that a malfunction occurred which would be likely to cause
or contribute to a death or serious injury upon recurrence. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is
subject to continual review and is monitored rigorously through periodic inspections by the FDA, which may
result in observations on Form 483, and in some cases warning letters, that require corrective action. If the FDA
or equivalent foreign agency were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations,
or that any of our medical devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA or equivalent
foreign agency could ban such medical devices, detain or seize such medical devices, order a recall, repair,
replacement, or refund of such devices, or require us to notify health professionals and others that the devices
present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health.

Governments are expected to continue to scrutinize the industry closely with inspections, and possibly
enforcement actions, by the FDA or equivalent
the FDA may restrict
manufacturing and impose other operating restrictions, enjoin and restrain certain violations of applicable law
pertaining to medical devices, and assess civil or criminal penalties against our officers, employees, or us. The
FDA may also recommend prosecution to the Department of Justice. Any adverse regulatory action, depending
on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively manufacturing, marketing and selling our products and could
have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, negative publicity
and product liability claims resulting from any adverse regulatory action could have a material, adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.

foreign agencies. Additionally,

While we have taken measures to enhance our Quality System, we cannot assure you that future inspections
by the FDA and the standards they apply will not result in warning letters for any facility in the future. We are
also subject to inspections of our Quality System by regulatory agencies outside the U.S. which could result in
the issuance of nonconformance or significant requirements to our Quality System.

The FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (“FDARA”), which includes the reauthorization of the Medical
Device User Fee Amendments of 2012, as well as other medical device provisions, went into effect October 1,
2017. This includes performance goals and user fees paid to the FDA by medical device companies when they
register and list with the FDA and when they submit an application to market a device in the U.S. Under

19

FDARA, this user fee program has been reauthorized through fiscal year 2022. Under the Medical Device User
Fee Amendments, or MDUFA III,
there are additional requirements regarding the FDA Establishment
Registration and Listing of Medical Devices. All U.S. and foreign manufacturers must register and list medical
devices for sale in the U.S. All of our facilities comply with these requirements. That said, we also source
products from foreign contract manufacturers. From this business practice, it is possible that some of our foreign
contract manufacturers will not comply with these requirements and choose not to register with the FDA. In such
an event, we will need to determine if there are alternative foreign contract manufacturers who comply with the
FDA Establishment Registration requirements. If such a foreign contract manufacturer is a sole supplier of one of
our products, there is a risk that we may not be able to source another supplier and our business could be
adversely affected.

We are subject to extensive complex regulatory requirements by domestic and foreign government agencies
and any failure to comply with our ongoing responsibilities under their applicable laws and regulations could
result in a material adverse impact on our business.

In addition,

the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“ FDCA”) permits device
manufacturers to promote products solely for the uses and indications set forth in the approved product labeling.
A number of enforcement actions have been taken against manufacturers that promote products for “off-label”
uses, including actions alleging that federal health care program reimbursement of products promoted for
“off-label” uses are false and fraudulent claims to the government. The failure to comply with “off-label”
promotion restrictions can result in significant financial penalties and a required corporate integrity agreement
with the federal government imposing significant administrative obligations and costs, and potential evaluation
from federal health care programs.

Foreign governmental regulations have become more stringent and we may become subject to even more
rigorous regulation by foreign governmental authorities in the future, which could have a material, adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Penalties for a company’s noncompliance with
foreign governmental regulation could be severe, including revocation or suspension of a company’s business
license and criminal sanctions. For example, we are subject to Good Manufacturing Practice regulations for
Pharmaceuticals in the EU for certain of our products. These regulations also mandate that manufacturers of
medical devices (or those that are considered pharmaceuticals) adhere to certain quality assurance requirements
pertaining to, among other things, validation of manufacturing processes, controls for purchasing product
components, and documentation practices. There may be additional regulations if such products are considered
pharmaceuticals outside the U.S.

In addition, the new European Medical Device Regulation (“EU MDR”) passed in the European Parliament
on April 5, 2017 and went into effect on May 25, 2017, replacing the Medical Device Directive. The EU MDR is
an extensive reform of the rules that govern the medical device industry in Europe. Under this regulation,
manufacturers will have three (3) years to comply with a broad set of new rules for almost every kind of medical
device. The EU MDR will require changes in the clinical evidence required for medical devices, post-market
clinical follow-up evidence, annual reporting of safety information for Class III products, and bi-annual reporting
for Class II products, Unique Device Identification (“UDI”) for all products, submission of core data elements to
a European UDI database prior to placement of a device on the market, reclassification of medical devices, and
multiple other labeling changes.

Under the new EU MDR rules, medical device companies will have to, among other things. do the

following:

•

provide significantly more clinical evidence to get new products to market and even to keep existing
products on the market;

• make changes to product labeling and make certain product data available to the public; and

20

•

conduct product portfolio assessments to determine the impact of the EU MDR on the Company’s
margins.

Overall, medical device companies can expect longer lead times to obtain product registrations (CE Mark
Certification) in the EU and a substantially costlier pathway to compliance in the EU. We are not yet able to
determine the costs of complying with these regulations, how the EU will interpret and enforce them, what the
timelines for approvals of products will be and the overall effect of the EU MDR on the marketplace. Given the
significant additional pre-market and post-market requirements imposed by the EU MDR, the overall impact of
these new rules could have a material, adverse effect on the Company’s revenues and expenses.

Certain of our products contain materials derived from animal sources and may become subject to
additional regulation.

Certain of our products, including our dermal regeneration products, duraplasty products, wound care
products, bone void fillers, nerve and tendon repair products and certain other products, contain material derived
from bovine tissue. In 2018, approximately 37% of our revenues derived from products containing material
derived from bovine tissue. Products that contain materials derived from animal sources, including food,
pharmaceuticals and medical devices, are subject to scrutiny in the media and by regulatory authorities.
Regulatory authorities are concerned about the potential for the transmission of disease from animals to humans
via those materials. This public scrutiny has been particularly acute in Japan and Western Europe with respect to
products derived from animal sources, because of concern that materials infected with the agent that causes
bovine spongiform encephalopathy, otherwise known as BSE or mad cow disease, may, if ingested or implanted,
cause a variant of the human Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, an ultimately fatal disease with no known cure. The
World Organization for Animal Health (“OIE”) recognizes the U.S. as having a negligible risk for BSE, which is
the highest status available.

We take care to provide that our products are safe and free of agents that can cause disease. In particular, we
qualified a source of collagen from a country outside the U.S. that is considered BSE/TSE-free. The World
Health Organization classifies different types of bovine tissue for relative risk of BSE transmission. Deep flexor
tendon and bovine fetal skin, which are used in our products, are in the lowest-risk categories for BSE
transmission and are therefore considered to have a negligible risk of containing the agent that causes BSE (an
improperly folded protein known as a prion). Nevertheless, products that contain materials derived from animals,
including our products, could become subject to additional regulation, or even be banned in certain countries,
because of concern over the potential for the transmission of prions. Significant new regulation, or a ban of our
products, could have a material, adverse effect on our current business or our ability to expand our business.

Certain countries, such as Japan, China, Taiwan and Argentina, have issued regulations that require our
collagen products be sourced from countries where no cases of BSE have occurred, and the EU has requested that
our dural replacement products and other products that are used in neurological tissue be sourced from a country
where no cases of BSE have occurred. Currently, we source bovine fetal hides from the U.S. and purchase tendon
from the U.S. and New Zealand. New Zealand has never had a case of BSE. We received approval in the U.S.,
the EU, Japan, Taiwan, China, Argentina as well as other countries for the use of New Zealand-sourced tendon in
the manufacturing of our products. If we cannot continue to use or qualify a source of tendon from New Zealand
or another country that has never had a case of BSE, we could be prohibited from selling our collagen products in
certain countries.

Certain of our products are derived from human tissue and are subject to additional regulations and
requirements.

We manufacture and distribute products derived from human tissue. The FDA has specific regulations
governing human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product
containing or consisting of human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. Examples

21

include bone, ligament, skin, amniotic tissue and cornea. HCT/Ps that meet the criteria for regulation solely
under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (“Section 361”) are not subject to any premarket clearance or
approval requirements but are subject to post-market regulatory requirements.

Some HCT/Ps also meet the definition of a biological product, medical device or drug regulated under the
FDCA. These biologic, device or drug HCT/Ps must comply both with the requirements exclusively applicable to
Section 361 HCT/Ps and, in addition, with requirements applicable to biologics, devices or drugs, including
premarket clearance or approval.

On June 22, 2015, the FDA issued an Untitled Letter alleging that BioD’s morselized amniotic membrane
tissue based products do not meet the criteria for regulation as HCT/Ps solely under Section 361 and that, as a
result, BioD would need a biologics license to lawfully market those morselized products. Since the issuance of
the Untitled Letter, BioD and more recently the Company have been in discussions with the FDA to
communicate their disagreement with the FDA’s assertion that certain products are more than minimally
manipulated. The FDA has not changed its position that certain of the BioD acquired products are not eligible for
marketing solely under Section 361.

In November 2017, the FDA issued the final guidance document related to human tissue titled, “Regulatory
Considerations for Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and
Homologous Use” (the “HCT/P Final Guidance”). The HCT/P Final Guidance maintains the FDA’s position that
products such as the Company’s morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products do not meet the criteria
for regulation solely as HCT/Ps. In addition, the FDA articulated a risk-based approach to enforcement and,
while some uses for amniotic membrane tissue-based products would enjoy as much as thirty-six months of
enforcement discretion, other high risk uses could be subject to immediate enforcement action. The Company
does not believe the uses for its amniotic membrane tissue-based products fall into the high risk-category.
Nonetheless, we can make no assurances that the FDA will continue to exercise its enforcement discretion with
respect to the Company’s amniotic membrane tissue-based products, and any potential action of the FDA could
have a financial impact regarding the sales of such products. The Company has been considering and continues
to consider regulatory approval pathways for its amniotic membrane tissue-based products. Revenues from BioD
morselized amniotic material-based products for the year ended December 31, 2018 was less than 1% of
consolidated revenues.

Lack of market acceptance for our products or market preference for technologies that compete with our
products could reduce our revenues and profitability.

We cannot be certain that our current products or any other products that we develop or market will achieve
or maintain market acceptance. Certain of the medical indications that our devices can treat can also be treated by
other medical devices or by medical practices that do not include a device. The medical community widely
accepts many alternative treatments, and certain of these other treatments have a long history of use. For
example, the use of autograft tissue is a well-established means for repairing the dermis, and it competes for
acceptance in the market with our collagen-based wound care products.

We cannot be certain that our new devices and procedures will be able to replace those established
treatments or that physicians, the medical community or third-party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid,
private and public health insurers and foreign governmental health systems, will accept and utilize our devices or
any other medical products that we may develop. For example, greater market acceptance of our wound graft
products may ultimately depend on our ability to demonstrate that higher rates of reimbursement are justified
because they are an attractive and cost-effective alternative to other treatment options. Additionally, if there are
negative events in the industry, whether real or perceived, there could be a negative impact on the industry as a
whole.

In addition, our future success depends, in part, on our ability to license and develop additional products.
Even if we determine that a product candidate has medical benefits, the cost of commercializing that product

22

candidate, either through internal development or payments associated with licensing arrangements, could be too
high to justify development. Competitors could develop products that are more effective, achieve or maintain
more favorable reimbursement status from third-party payors both domestically and internationally, including
Medicare, Medicaid, private and public health insurers, and foreign governmental health systems, cost less or are
ready for commercial introduction before our products. If we are unable to develop additional commercially
viable products, our future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Market acceptance of our products depends on many factors, including our ability to convince prospective
collaborators and customers that our technology is an attractive alternative to other technologies, to manufacture
products in sufficient quantities and at acceptable costs, and to supply and service sufficient quantities of our
products directly or through our distribution alliances. In addition, unfavorable reimbursement methodologies, or
adverse determinations of third-party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid, private and public health insurers,
and foreign governmental health systems, regarding our products or third-party determinations that favor a
competitor’s product over ours, could harm acceptance or continued use of our products. The industry is subject
to rapid and continuous change arising from, among other things, consolidation, technological improvements, the
pressure on governments, third-party payors and providers to reduce healthcare costs, and healthcare reform
these factors could vary
legislation and initiatives domestically and internationally. One or more of
unpredictably, and such variations could have a material, adverse effect on our competitive position. We may not
be able to adjust our contemplated plan of development to meet changing market demands.

Economic and political instability around the world could adversely affect the ability of hospitals, other
customers, suppliers and distributors to access funds or otherwise have available liquidity, which could
reduce orders for our products or interrupt our production or distribution or result in a reduction in elective
and non-reimbursed operative procedures.

Economic and political instability around the world could adversely affect the ability of hospitals and other
customers to access funds to enable them to fund their operating and capital budgets. As a result, hospitals and
other customers could reduce budgets or put all or part of their budgets on hold or close their operations, which
could have a negative effect on our sales, particularly the sales of capital equipment such as our ultrasonic
in a reduction in elective and
surgical aspirators, neuromonitors and stereotactic products, or
non-reimbursed procedures. The occurrence of those economic conditions could make it more difficult for us to
accurately forecast and plan our future business activities and depending on their severity, could have a material,
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

result

We may have additional tax liabilities.

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and many foreign jurisdictions and are commonly audited by
various tax authorities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where
the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide
provision for income taxes. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of
tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and
accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material, adverse effect on our financial statements in
the period or periods for which that determination is made.

Our leverage and debt service obligations could adversely affect our business.

As of December 31, 2018, our total consolidated external debt was approximately $1.4 billion. (See Item 7
for a discussion of our consolidated external debt.) We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our
substantial indebtedness could have material, adverse consequences, including:

• making it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations;

•

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, regulatory and industry conditions, and placing us at
a disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged;

23

•

•

limiting our ability to compete and our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our
business and the industry in which we operate; and

limiting our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions
and general corporate or other purposes.

Our debt service obligations will require us to use a portion of our operating cash flow to pay interest and
principal on indebtedness instead of for other corporate purposes, including funding future expansion of our
business, acquisitions, and ongoing capital expenditures, which could impede our growth. In addition, the
Company may attempt to refinance or extend this obligation depending on prevailing market conditions. Our
ability to refinance or extend this obligation will depend on our operating and financial performance, which in
turn is subject
to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors beyond our
control. Any disruptions in our operations, the financial markets, or overall economy may adversely affect the
availability and cost of credit to us.

It could be difficult to replace some of our suppliers.

Outside vendors, some of whom are sole-source suppliers, provide key components and raw materials used
in the manufacture of our products. Although we believe that alternative sources for many of these components
and raw materials are available, any interruption in supply of a limited or sole-source component or raw material
could harm our ability to manufacture our products until a new or alternative source of supply is identified and
qualified. In addition, an uncorrected defect or supplier’s variation in a component or raw material, either
unknown to us or incompatible with our manufacturing process, could harm our ability to manufacture products.
We may not be able to find a sufficient alternative supplier in a reasonable time period, or on commercially
reasonable terms, if at all, and our ability to produce and supply our products could be impaired. We believe that
these factors are most likely to affect the following products that we manufacture:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

our collagen-based products, such as the Integra Dermal Regeneration Template and wound matrix
the DuraGen® family of products, our Absorbable Collagen Sponges, Primatrix and
products,
SurgiMend products;

our products made from silicone, such as our neurosurgical shunts and drainage systems and
hemodynamic shunts;

products which use many different specialty parts from numerous suppliers, such as our intracranial
monitors, catheters and headlights;

products that use pyrolytic carbon (i.e., PyroCarbon) technology, such as certain of our reconstructive
extremity orthopedic implants;

products which are amniotic tissue based;

products that use medical grade leptospermum honey, such as our Medihoney products; and

our TCC-EZ ® total contact cast system products.

In connection with our Confluent Surgical acquisition in January 2014, we entered into a multi-year supply
agreement with an affiliate of the seller to continue to manufacture the acquired surgical sealant and adhesion
barrier product lines. Pursuant to a contract we entered in 2015, we transferred manufacturing of these product
lines to a third party in 2018.

If we were suddenly unable to purchase products or services from one or more of the companies identified
above, we would need a significant period of time to qualify a replacement, and the production of any affected
products could be disrupted, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial condition and business
operations.

24

While it is our policy to maintain sufficient inventory of components so that our production will not be
significantly disrupted even if a particular component or material is not available for a period of time, we remain
at risk that we will not be able to qualify new components or materials quickly enough to prevent a disruption if
one or more of our suppliers ceases production of important components or materials.

Our intellectual property rights may not provide meaningful commercial protection for our products,
potentially enabling third parties to use our technology or very similar technology and could reduce our
ability to compete in the market.

To compete effectively, we depend, in part, on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our
technologies and manufacturing processes, which includes the ability to obtain, protect and enforce patents on
our technology and to protect our trade secrets. We own or have licensed patents that cover aspects of some of
our product lines. Our patents, however, may not provide us with any significant competitive advantage. Others
may challenge our patents and, as a result, our patents could be narrowed, invalidated or rendered unenforceable.
Competitors may develop products similar to ours that our patents do not cover. In addition, the approval or
rejection of patent applications may take several years and our current and future patent applications may not
result in the issuance of patents in the U.S. or foreign countries.

Our competitive position depends, in part, upon unpatented trade secrets, which we may be unable to
protect.

Our competitive position also depends upon unpatented trade secrets, which are difficult to protect. We
cannot assure you that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and
techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, that our trade secrets will not be disclosed or that we can
effectively protect our rights to unpatented trade secrets.

In an effort to protect our trade secrets, we require our employees, consultants and advisors to execute
confidentiality and invention assignment agreements upon commencement of employment or consulting
relationships with us. These agreements provide that, except
in specified circumstances, all confidential
information developed or made known to the individual during the course of their relationships with us must be
kept confidential. We cannot assure you, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for
our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of the unauthorized use or disclosure of
confidential information.

Our success will depend partly on our ability to operate without infringing or misappropriating the
proprietary rights of others.

We may be sued for infringing the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, we may find it
necessary, if threatened, to initiate a lawsuit seeking a declaration from a court that we do not infringe the
proprietary rights of others or that their rights are invalid or unenforceable. If we do not prevail in any litigation,
in addition to any damages we might have to pay, we would be required to stop the infringing activity (which
could include a cessation of selling the products in question) or obtain a license for the proprietary rights
involved. Any required license may be unavailable to us on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, some licenses
may be nonexclusive and allow our competitors to access the same technology we license.

If we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to design our products so as not to infringe on the
proprietary rights of others, we may be unable to sell some of our products, and this potential inability could have
a material, adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

We may be involved in lawsuits relating to our intellectual property rights and promotional practices, which
may be expensive.

To protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, we may have to initiate or defend legal proceedings,
such as infringement suits or opposition proceedings, against or by third parties. In addition, we may have to

25

institute proceedings regarding our competitors’ promotional practices or defend proceedings regarding our
promotional practices. Legal proceedings are costly, and, even if we prevail, the cost of the legal proceedings
could affect our profitability. In addition, litigation is time-consuming and could divert management’s attention
and resources away from our business. Moreover, in response to our claims against other parties, those parties
could assert counterclaims against us.

If we do not successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into our business operations, including
Codman Neurosurgery, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We will need to successfully integrate the operations of recently and pending acquired businesses, including
our acquisition of Codman Neurosurgery, with our business operations. The failure to integrate the business
operations of the acquired businesses successfully would have a material, adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. As a result of these acquisitions, we will undergo substantial
changes in a short period of time and our business will change and broaden in size and the scope of products we
offer. Integrating the operations of multiple new businesses with that of our own is a complex, costly and time-
consuming process, which requires significant management attention and resources, including the coordination of
information technologies, sales and marketing, research and development, operations, manufacturing and finance
functions. The integration process could disrupt the businesses and, if implemented ineffectively, could preclude
realization of the full benefits that we expect from these transactions. Our failure to meet the challenges involved
in integrating the businesses in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions could cause an
interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, our activities and could materially and adversely affect our results of
operations. Prior to each acquisition, the acquired business operated independently, with its own business,
corporate culture, locations, employees and systems. There may be substantial difficulties, costs and delays
involved in any integration of other businesses with that of our own. These may include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

distracting management from day-to-day operations;

potential incompatibility of corporate cultures;

an inability to achieve synergies as planned;

risks associated with the assumption of contingent or other liabilities of acquisition targets;

adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers or customers, including failure to
retain key customers and suppliers;

failure to retain key employees of our company and of the acquired businesses;

inheriting and uncovering previously unknown issues, problems and costs from the acquired company;

delays between our expenditures to acquire new products,
generation of revenues from those acquired products, technologies or businesses;

technologies or businesses and the

realization of assets and settlement of liabilities at amounts equal to estimated fair value as of the
acquisition date of any acquisition or disposition;

an inability to integrate information technology systems of acquired businesses in a secure and reliable
manner;

costs and delays in implementing common systems and procedures (including technology, compliance
programs, financial systems, distribution and general business operations, among others);

liabilities that are significantly larger than we currently anticipate and unforeseen increased expenses or
delays associated with the acquisitions, including transition costs to integrate the businesses that may
exceed the costs that we currently anticipate;

challenges involved with the increased scale of our operations resulting from the acquisitions; and

increased difficulties in managing our business due to the addition of international locations.

26

These risks may be heightened in cases where the majority of the former businesses’ operations, employees
and customers are located outside the U.S. Any one or all of these factors could increase operating costs or lower
anticipated financial performance. Many of these factors are also outside of our control. In addition, dispositions
of certain key products, technologies and other rights, including pursuant to conditions imposed on us to obtain
regulatory approvals, may affect our business operations.

In connection with the acquisition of the Codman Neurosurgery business from Johnson & Johnson, we
entered into certain transition services agreements with Johnson & Johnson under which they are providing
certain manufacturing, distribution and other services to the Company. While we have transitioned off of certain
of the transition services, any interruption in, or inability of Johnson & Johnson to provide, these services for any
reason could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if the operations of the businesses are integrated successfully, we may not realize the full benefits of
the acquisition, including the synergies, cost savings or sales or growth opportunities that we expect. These
benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all. Additional unanticipated costs could be
incurred in the integration of the businesses. All of these factors could cause a reduction to our earnings per
share, decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the transaction, and negatively impact the price of our
ordinary shares.

If any of our facilities were damaged and/or our manufacturing or business processes interrupted, we could
experience lost revenues and our business could be seriously harmed.

Damage to our manufacturing, distribution, development and/or research facilities because of fire, extreme
weather conditions, natural disaster, power loss, communications failure, unauthorized entry or other events, such
as a flu or other health epidemic, could significantly disrupt our operations, the operations of suppliers and
critical infrastructure and delay or prevent product manufacture and shipment during the time required to repair,
rebuild or replace the damaged facilities. Certain of our manufacturing facilities are located in Puerto Rico,
which in the past has experienced both severe earthquakes and other natural disasters. We believe the risk
associated with operating a manufacturing plant in Puerto Rico, post Hurricane Maria, has returned to historical
levels. While there are still some challenges with the energy system and service is occasionally disrupted for
short periods, it has not impacted operations primarily due to the generator capacity at the plant. Although we
maintain property damage and business interruption insurance coverage on these facilities, our insurance might
not cover all losses under such circumstances, and we may not be able to renew or obtain such insurance in the
future on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or at reasonable costs.

In addition, certain of our surgical instruments have some manufacturing processes performed by third
parties in Pakistan, and we purchase a much smaller amount of instruments directly from vendors there. Pakistan
is subject to political instability and unrest. Such instability could interrupt our ability to sell surgical instruments
to our customers and could have a material, adverse effect on our revenues and earnings. While we have
developed a relationship with an alternative provider of these services in another country, and continue to work
to develop other providers in other countries, we cannot guarantee that we will be completely successful in
in establishing all of these alternative
establishing all of these relationships. Even if we are successful
relationships, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so at the same level of costs or that we will be able
to pass along additional costs to our customers.

Further, we manufacture certain products in Europe and our European headquarters is located in France,
which has experienced labor strikes and acts of terrorism. Thus far, strikes and acts of terrorism have not had a
material impact on our business; however, if either were to occur, there is no assurance that they would not
disrupt our business, and any such disruption could have a material, adverse effect on our business.

An experienced third-party hosts and maintains the enterprise business system used to support certain of our
transaction processing for accounting and financial reporting, supply chain and manufacturing. Currently, we

27

have developed a comprehensive disaster recovery plan for the Company’s infrastructure. As we have not fully
tested the plan, we have adopted alternative solutions to mitigate business risk, including backup equipment,
power and communications. We also implemented a comprehensive backup and recovery process for our key
applications. Our global production and distribution operations are dependent on the effective management of
information flow between facilities. An interruption of the support provided by our enterprise business systems
could have a material, adverse effect on the business.

We may experience difficulties, delays, performance impact or unexpected costs from consolidation of
facilities.

We consolidated several facilities in recent years and may further consolidate our operations in the future in
order to improve our cost structure, achieve increased operating efficiencies, and improve our competitive
standing or results of operations and/or to address unfavorable economic conditions. As part of these initiatives,
we may also lose favorable tax incentives or not be able to renew leases on acceptable terms. We may further
reduce staff, make changes to certain capital projects, close certain production operations and abandon leases for
certain facilities that will not be used in our operations. In conjunction with any actions, we will continue to
make significant investments and build the framework for our future growth. We may not realize, in full or in
part,
the anticipated benefits and savings from these efforts because of unforeseen difficulties, delays,
implementation issues or unexpected costs. If we are unable to achieve or maintain all of the resulting savings or
benefits to our business or other unforeseen events occur, our business and results of operations may be adversely
affected.

We are exposed to a variety of risks relating to our international sales and operations.

We generate significant revenues outside the U.S. in multiple foreign currencies, and in U.S. dollar-
denominated transactions conducted with customers who generate revenue in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. For those foreign customers who purchase our products in U.S. dollars, currency fluctuations
between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which those customers do business may have a negative impact on
the demand for our products in foreign countries where the U.S. dollar has increased in value compared to the
local currency.

Since we have operations based outside the U.S. and we generate revenues and incur operating expenses in
multiple foreign currencies, we experience currency exchange risk with respect to those foreign currency-
denominated revenues and expenses. Our most significant currency exchange risk relates to transactions
conducted in Australian dollars, British pounds, Canadian dollars, Chinese yuan, euros, Japanese yen, and Swiss
francs.

We cannot predict the consolidated effects of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future operating results
because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposure and the potential volatility of
currency exchange rates. Although we address currency risk management
through regular operating and
financing activities, and, on a limited basis, through the use of derivative financial instruments, those actions may
not prove to be fully effective. For a description of our use of derivative financial instruments, see Note 6,
Derivative Instruments in our consolidated financial statements.

Our international operations subject us to laws regarding sanctioned countries, entities and persons,
customs, import-export, laws regarding transactions in foreign countries, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
and local anti-bribery and other laws regarding interactions with healthcare professionals, and product
registration requirements. Among other things, these laws restrict, and in some cases prevent, U.S. companies
from directly or indirectly selling goods, technology or services to people or entities in certain countries. In
addition, these laws require that we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices and effecting
product registrations in foreign countries.

28

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (UK) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the
EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” As a result of the referendum, the British government began negotiating
the terms of the UK’s future relationship with the EU. Until the terms of the UK’s exit from the EU on March 29,
2019 are determined, including any transition period, it is difficult to predict its impact. It is possible that the
withdrawal could, among other things, affect the legal and regulatory environments to which our business is
subject, impose greater restrictions on imports and exports between the UK and the EU and other parties, and
create economic and political uncertainty in the region.

From time to time, proposals are made to significantly change existing trade agreements and relationships
between the U.S. and other countries. Recently, the U.S. and China have imposed tariffs on products imported
into their respective countries. While we currently do not anticipate that these tariffs will have a material impact
on our business, the list of items subject to these tariffs could change and it is possible that they could adversely
impact our supply chain costs or our ability to sell certain of our products in China. More generally, additional
tariffs or other trade barriers imposed by the U.S. or other countries could materially and adversely affect our
operations and financial results.

Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the manner in which we may sell medical devices and
compete in the marketplace.

There are laws and regulations that govern the means by which companies in the healthcare industry may
market their products to healthcare professionals and may compete by discounting the prices of their products,
including for example, the federal Anti- Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, the federal Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, state law equivalents to these federal laws that are meant to
protect against fraud and abuse and analogous laws in foreign countries. Violations of these laws are punishable
by criminal and civil sanctions, including, but not limited to, in some instances civil and criminal penalties,
damages, fines, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare and
Medicaid. Although we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices and customer discount
arrangements to comply with those laws and regulations, we cannot assure that:

•

•

government officials charged with responsibility for enforcing those laws will not assert that our sales
and marketing practices or customer discount arrangements are in violation of those laws or
regulations; or

government regulators or courts will interpret those laws or regulations in a manner consistent with our
interpretation.

Correspondingly, federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation, and from time to time we
may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage if our interpretation differs from that of our competitors.
AdvaMed (for the U.S. and China), MedTech Europe (Europe), Mecomed (Middle East), and APACMed (Asia
Pacific), some of the principal trade associations for the medical device industry, promulgate model codes of
ethics that set forth standards by which its members should (and non-member companies may) abide in the
promotion of their products. We have in place policies and procedures for compliance that we believe are at least
as stringent as those set forth in the AdvaMed Code, and we regularly train our sales and marketing personnel on
our policies regarding sales and marketing practices. Pursuant to the AdvaMed Code, we have certified our
adoption of the AdvaMed Code. Nevertheless, the sales and marketing practices of our industry have been the
subject of increased scrutiny from federal and state government agencies, and we believe that this trend will
continue. Various hospital organizations, medical societies and trade associations are establishing their own
practices that may require detailed disclosures of relationships between healthcare professionals and medical
device companies or ban or restrict certain marketing and sales practices such as gifts and business meals.

29

Our private-label product lines depend significantly on key relationships with third parties, which we could
be unable to establish and maintain.

Our private-label business depends in part on our entering into and maintaining long-term supply
agreements with third parties. The third parties with whom we have entered into agreements might terminate
these agreements for a variety of reasons, including developing other sources for the products that we supply.
Termination of our most important relationships could adversely affect our expectations for the growth of
private-label products.

We may have significant product liability exposure and our insurance may not cover all potential claims.

We are exposed to product liability and other claims if our technologies or products are alleged to have
caused harm. We may not be able to obtain insurance for the potential liability on acceptable terms with adequate
coverage or at reasonable costs. Any potential product liability claims could exceed the amount of our insurance
coverage or may be excluded from coverage under the terms of the policy. Our insurance may not be renewed at
a cost and level of coverage comparable to that then in effect.

We are subject to requirements relating to hazardous materials which may impose significant compliance or
other costs on us.

Our manufacturing, product development, research, and development operations and processes involve the
controlled use of certain hazardous materials. In addition, we own and/or lease a number of facilities at which
hazardous materials have been used in the past. Finally, we have acquired various companies that historically
have used certain hazardous materials and that have owned and/or leased facilities at which hazardous materials
have been used. For all of these reasons, we are subject to federal, state, foreign, and local laws and regulations
treatment, remediation, and disposal of
transportation, handling,
governing the use, manufacture, storage,
hazardous materials and certain waste products (“Environmental, Health, Safety and Transportation Laws”).
Although we believe that our procedures for handling, transporting, and disposing of hazardous materials comply
with the Environmental, Health, Safety and Transportation Laws,
the Environmental Health, Safety and
Transportation Laws may be amended in ways that increase our cost of compliance, perhaps materially.

Furthermore, the potential risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be
eliminated, and there is also a risk that such contamination previously has occurred in connection with one of our
facilities or in connection with one of the companies we have purchased. In the event of such an accident or
contamination, we could be held liable for any damages that result and any related liability could exceed the
limits or fall outside the coverage of our insurance and could exceed our resources. We may not be able to
maintain insurance on acceptable terms or at all.

Cyber-attacks or other disruptions to our information technology systems could adversely affect our
business.

We are increasingly dependent on sophisticated information technology for our infrastructure and to support
business decisions. As a result of technology initiatives, recently enacted regulations, changes in our system
platforms and integration of new business acquisitions, we have been consolidating and integrating our systems.
Our information systems require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain, protect, and
enhance existing systems and develop new systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information
processing technology, evolving systems and regulatory standards, the increasing need to protect patient and
customer information, and changing customer patterns. Any significant breakdown, intrusion, interruption,
corruption, or destruction of these systems, as well as any data breaches, could have a material, adverse effect on
our business.

In addition, third parties may attempt to breach our systems and may obtain data relating to patients, the
Company’s proprietary information, or other sensitive data. If we fail to maintain or protect our information

30

systems and data integrity effectively, we could lose existing customers, have difficulty attracting new
customers, suffer backlash from negative public relations, have problems in determining product cost estimates
and establishing appropriate pricing, have difficulty preventing, detecting, and controlling fraud, have disputes
with customers, physicians, and other health care professionals, have regulatory sanctions or penalties imposed,
have increases in operating expenses, incur expenses or lose revenues as a result of a data privacy breach, or
suffer other adverse consequences.

We have programs, processes and technologies in place to prevent, detect, contain, respond to and mitigate
incidents. We undertake considerable ongoing improvements to our
security related threats and potential
systems, connected devices and information-sharing products in order to minimize vulnerabilities, in accordance
with industry and regulatory standards. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access change
frequently and can be difficult to detect, anticipating, identifying or preventing these intrusions or mitigating
them if and when they occur, may be challenging.

We also rely on third party vendors to supply and/or support certain aspects of our information technology
systems. Third party systems may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could result in
system disruption or unexpectedly compromise the information security of our own systems, and we are
dependent on these third parties to provide reliable systems and software and to deploy appropriate security
programs to protect their systems.

In addition, we continue to grow in part through new business acquisitions. As a result of acquisitions, we
may face risks due to implementation, modification, or remediation of controls, procedures, and policies relating
to data privacy and cybersecurity at the acquired business. We continue to consolidate and integrate the number
of systems we operate, and to upgrade and expand our information system capabilities for stable and secure
business operations.

If we are unable to maintain reliable information technology systems and prevent disruptions, outages, or
data breaches, we may suffer regulatory consequences in addition to business consequences. Our worldwide
operations mean that we are subject to laws and regulations, including data protection and cyber security laws
and regulations, in many jurisdictions. The variety of U.S. and international privacy and cybersecurity laws and
regulations impacting our operations are described in “Item 1. Business—Government Regulation—Other
Factors—Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Laws and Regulations.” We have programs to ensure compliance with
such laws and regulations. However,
there is no guarantee that we will avoid enforcement actions by
governmental bodies. Enforcement actions may be costly and interrupt regular operations of our business. In
addition, there has been a developing trend of civil lawsuits and class actions relating to breaches of consumer
data held by large companies or incidents arising from other cyber-attacks. While Integra has not been named in
any such suits, if a substantial breach or loss of data were to occur, we could become a target of such litigation.

Changes in the calculation and or complete replacement of LIBOR could have an impact on our business.

The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced in July 2017 that
it will no longer persuade or require banks to submit rates for LIBOR after 2021. This announcement and global
financial benchmark reforms generally have resulted in the future of certain interest rate benchmarks being more
uncertain. There is a chance that LIBOR may be disrupted, materially change, or no longer be published in the
future. Currently, there is no definitive information regarding the future of LIBOR or a replacement rate. We
have multiple debt facilities which bear interest at a variable rate equal to the Eurodollar LIBOR rate in effect
from time to time. A change or transition away from LIBOR as a common reference rate in the global financial
market could have a material, adverse effect on our business. Management continues to monitor the status and
discussions regarding LIBOR.

31

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we had no unresolved comments from the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that were received not less than 180 days before the end of our 2018 fiscal
year.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices are located in Plainsboro, New Jersey. Our principal manufacturing and
research facilities are located in New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Canada, France,
Germany, Ireland, Switzerland, and Puerto Rico. Our instrument procurement operations are located in Germany.
Our primary distribution centers are located in Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Australia, Belgium,
Canada and France. In addition, we lease several smaller facilities to support additional administrative, assembly,
and distribution operations. Third parties own and operate the facilities in Nevada, Kentucky and Belgium. We
own our facilities in Biot, France, Saint Aubin Le Monial, France, Rietheim-Weilheim, Germany, Ohio, and
Pennsylvania and we lease all of our other facilities. We also have repair centers in California, Massachusetts,
Ohio, Australia and Germany.

Our manufacturing facilities are registered with the FDA. Our facilities are subject to FDA inspection to
ensure compliance with Quality System regulations. For further information regarding the status of FDA
inspections, see the “Government Regulation” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations—Update on Remediation Activities” sections in this Form 10-K.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings are pending or have been settled by us; the most significant of

which are described below.

to various claims,

The Company is subject

lawsuits and proceedings in the ordinary course of the
Company’s business, including claims by current or former employees, distributors and competitors and with
respect to its products and product liability claims, lawsuits and proceedings, some of which have been settled by
the Company. In the opinion of management, such claims are either adequately covered by insurance or
otherwise indemnified, or are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material, adverse effect
on our financial condition. However, it is possible that the Company’s results of operations, financial position
and cash flows in a particular period could be materially affected by these contingencies.

TEI

TEI, acquired by Integra on July 17, 2015, manufactures a bovine-derived surgical mesh product for Boston
Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) and has been named as a defendant in lawsuits under a broad range of products
liability theories, many of which have not been served on TEI. As of January 14, 2019, only one active case
remained against TEI. Pursuant to an indemnification agreement with BSC (i) BSC is managing the litigation;
and (ii) TEI has in place a product liability insurance policy, of which it must exhaust $3.0 million before BSC’s
indemnity begins to cover relevant claims (and of which only a small portion has been utilized to date and
against which the insurer has reserved the entire $3.0 million ). In addition, Integra has certain protections in the
merger agreements with TEI which would indemnify it for approximately $30.0 million for the first fifteen
months after closing and between $20.0 and $30.0 million for the remainder of the three -year period after
closing for losses relating to a variety of matters, including half of certain products liability claims (including
those related to the product it manufactures for BSC) not covered by insurance. As of December 31, 2018, no
indemnification payments were received nor owed in relation to the lawsuits.

32

BioD

On April 7, 2017, the Company’s indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, BioD filed an action in the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County seeking a declaration that the resignation of Russell
Olsen, the former CEO of BioD, was “for Good Reason” (as defined in Olsen’s employment agreement); a
finding that Olsen breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, committed legal fraud, equitable
fraud and negligent misrepresentation; and an award of damages for such actions, including a return of severance
fees paid to Olsen. BioD was acquired in August 2016 by Derma Sciences, which Integra subsequently acquired
in February 2017. After receiving a job offer from Integra that Olsen believed materially diminished his title and
authority, on February 24, 2017 Olsen indicated his intention to terminate his position with BioD for Good
Reason, as otherwise permitted by his employment agreement with BioD. Shortly thereafter, Cynthia Weatherly
(as representative of the former equity owners of BioD) claimed in a letter to Derma Sciences that Olsen’s
resignation was a “termination Without Cause” (as also defined in Olsen’s employment agreement), which would
arguably trigger an acceleration of the earn out under a merger agreement between Derma Sciences, BioD and
other parties (the “BioD Merger Agreement”), which was entered into in July 2016, and require as a result of the
acceleration the payment of $26.5 million by BioD. As previously disclosed and described in
Note 4—Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results, Integra assumed this contingent liability in connection with its
acquisition of Derma Sciences. The action for a declaratory judgment was filed to clarify that Olsen’s
termination was for Good Reason and not Without Cause. If the employment agreement was terminated for Good
Reason, then the Company believes that the earn out provision under the BioD Merger Agreement should not be
accelerated and the likelihood of loss is remote.

The Company accrues for loss contingencies when it is deemed probable that a loss has been incurred and
that loss is estimable. The amounts accrued are based on the full amount of the estimated loss before considering
insurance proceeds, and do not include an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with the
loss contingency. The Company consistently accrues legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with loss
contingencies as those fees are incurred by outside counsel as a period cost.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

33

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information, Holders and Dividends

Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “IART.” The following table

lists the high and low closing sales prices for our common stock for each quarter for the last two years:

Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter

2018

2017

High

Low

High

Low

$64.51
$65.87
$67.23
$57.38

$42.62
$57.63
$54.05
$46.55

$51.77
$55.76
$54.54
$44.90

$46.22
$47.80
$40.86
$41.09

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our formation. Our credit facility limits
the amount of dividends that we may pay. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Amended and Restated Senior Credit
Agreement.” Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on the common stock will be at the discretion of
our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition and
other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

The number of stockholders of record as of February 22, 2019 was approximately 971, which includes

stockholders whose shares were held in nominee name.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 or 2016.

Sale of Registered Securities

In May 2018, the Company commenced and closed on a public offering of common stock. The Company
issued 6.0 million shares of common stock and received total proceeds, net of underwriting fees and offering
expenses, of approximately $349.6 million. The net proceeds from the offering were used to reduce outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit portion of the Company’s Senior Credit Facility.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On December 11, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $225.0 million
of the Company’s common stock. The program allows the Company to repurchase its shares opportunistically
from time to time. The repurchase authorization expires in December 2020. Purchases may be affected through
one or more open market
transactions structured through
investment banking institutions, or a combination of the foregoing. This stock repurchase authorization replaces
the previous $150.0 million stock repurchase authorization, approved by the Board in 2016.

transactions, privately negotiated transactions,

There have been no shares of common stock repurchased by the Company for the years ended December 31,

2018, 2017 or 2016.

See Note 8, Treasury Stock, in our consolidated financial statements for further details.

34

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this report. All results and data in the tables below reflect continuing operations,
unless otherwise noted. As a result, the data presented below will not necessarily agree to previously issued
financial statements. See Note 4, Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results for additional information regarding the
impact of 2018, 2017 and 2016 acquisitions in Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

Operating Results:
Total revenues, net
Costs and expenses

Operating income (4)
Interest expense, net (1) (2)
Other income (expense), net (7)

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

(In thousands, except per share data)

$1,472,441
1,361,443

$1,188,236
1,143,432

$992,075
876,735

$882,734
803,147

$796,717
728,860

110,998
(61,883)
8,288

44,804
(34,764)
1,345

115,340
(25,779)
845

79,587
(23,504)
4,588

67,857
(21,799)
(492)

Income from continuing operations before income

taxes

(Benefit from) provision for income taxes (4) (6)

Net income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations (net of tax

benefit)

Net income (loss)

Diluted net income per common share from

continuing operations

Diluted net loss per common share from

discontinued operations

Diluted net income (loss) per common share
Weighted average common shares outstanding for

$

$

$

$

$

$

57,403
(3,398)

11,385
(53,358)

90,406
15,842

60,671
53,820

45,566
9,271

60,801

$

64,743 $ 74,564

$

6,851

$ 36,295

— $

— $

— $ (10,370) $ (2,291)

60,801

$

64,743

$ 74,564

$ (3,519) $ 34,004

0.72

$

0.82

$

0.94

$

0.10

$

0.55

— $

— $

— $

(0.15) $

(0.03)

0.72

$

0.82

$

0.94

$

(0.05) $

0.52

diluted net income per share

83,999

79,121

79,194

71,354

65,920

Financial Position:
Cash, cash equivalents
Total assets (5) (8)
Short-term borrowings under the term loan

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

As of December 31,

(In thousands)

$ 138,838
3,107,887

$ 174,935
3,211,257

$ 102,055
1,807,954

$

48,132
1,774,224

$

71,734
1,412,402

of the Senior Credit Facility

22,500

60,000

—

14,375

3,750

Long-term borrowings including the

revolving portion of the Senior Credit
Facility (1)

Long-term debt (2) (5) (9)
Retained earnings (4)
Stockholders’ equity (3)

1,210,513
121,200
348,373
1,375,796

1,781,142
—
285,186
962,306

665,000
—
220,443
839,667

481,875
218,240
145,879
751,443

413,125
211,623
314,960
704,322

35

(1) For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we reported the borrowings
outstanding under the revolving portion of our Senior Credit Facility as long-term debt as well as the
1.625% convertible senior notes due in 2016 (“2016 Convertible Notes”). We also reported the term loan as
long-term debt with the exception of current principal payments due within 12 months, which are classified
as short-term. At December 31, 2018, we have a total of $1.2 billion outstanding under our Senior Credit
Facility and $954.4 million available for future borrowings.

(2)

(3)

In 2011, we issued $230.0 million of the 2016 Convertible Notes. The 2016 Convertible Notes were repaid
in December 2016 in accordance with their terms.

In 2018, we closed on a public offering of common stock. We issued 6.0 million shares of common stock
and received total proceeds, net of underwriting fees and offering expenses, of approximately
$349.6 million.

In 2015, we closed on a public offering of common stock. We issued 8.0 million shares of common stock
and received total proceeds, net of underwriting fees and offering expenses, of approximately
$219.7 million.

(4) On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method. Results of operations
for the reporting periods after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts
are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. The
adoption of Topic 606 resulted in an increase to the opening retained earnings of $1.9 million, which was
recorded net of taxes as of January 1, 2018 to reflect the change in timing of the recognition of revenue
related to the Company’s private label business from point in time to over time during the manufacturing
process and goods in transit for which control was transferred to customers at the time of shipment. Total
assets and liabilities increased by $7.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2018.

In 2016, the Company elected to adopt Accounting Standard Update 2016-09, Improvements to Employee
Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). The Company elected to account for forfeitures as they
occur. The impact in retained earnings as of December 31, 2015 from this provision was not significant.
Amendments related to accounting for excess tax benefits have been adopted prospectively, resulting in
recognition of excess tax benefits against income tax expenses rather than additional paid-in capital of
$3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(5)

In 2016, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt
Issuance Costs. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2016 on a retrospective basis. The
Company reclassified a portion of the debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt as of
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

(6) The benefit from income taxes in 2017 includes $43.4 million related to the re-measurement of our deferred
taxes resulting from a reduction of the federal statutory rate from 35% to 21% from the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act (the “2017 Tax Act”), enacted in December 2017 (see Note 12, Income Taxes, of the consolidated
financial statements).

(7)

In 2017, other income (expense), net, includes gain on sale of business of $2.6 million related to the
Divestiture to Natus (as defined in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis ).

(8) Presented for continuing operations only.

(9) During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company entered into an accounts receivable securitization facility
(the “Securitization Facility”). As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $121.2 million of outstanding
borrowings under its Securitization Facility. Refer to Note 5, Debt, for further information on the
Securitization Facility.

36

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
together with the selected consolidated financial data and our financial statements and the related notes appearing
elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-
looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not limited to those under the heading “Risk
Factors.”

GENERAL

Integra, headquartered in Plainsboro, New Jersey, is a world leader in medical technology. The Company
was founded in 1989 with the acquisition of an engineered collagen technology platform used to repair and
regenerate tissue. Since then, Integra has developed numerous product lines from this technology for applications
ranging from burn and deep tissue wounds, to the repair of dura mater in the brain, and the repair of nerves and
tendons. The Company has expanded its base regenerative technology business to include surgical instruments,
neurosurgical products, advanced wound care, and orthopedic hardware through a combination of several global
acquisitions and by developing products internally to further meet the needs of its customers.

We manufacture and sell our products in two reportable business segments: Codman Specialty Surgical and
Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies. Our Codman Specialty Surgical products offer specialty surgical implants
and instrumentation for a broad range of specialties. This product category includes products and solutions for
dural access and repair, precision tools and instruments, advanced energy, cerebral spinal fluid (“CSF”)
management and neuro monitoring including market-leading product portfolios used in neurosurgery operation
suites and critical care units. Our Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies products portfolios consists of
differentiated regenerative technology products for soft tissue repair and tissue regeneration products, and small
bone fixation and joint replacement hardware products for both upper extremities and lower extremities. This
business also includes private-label sales of a broad set of our regenerative and wound care medicine
technologies.

We manufacture many of our products in plants located in the United States (the “U.S.”), Canada, France,
Germany, Ireland, Switzerland, and Puerto Rico. We also source most of our handheld surgical instruments,
specialty metal and pyrocarbon implants, and dural sealant products through specialized third-party vendors.

Codman Specialty Surgical products are sold through a combination of directly employed sales
representatives, distributors and wholesalers, depending on the customer call point. In 2018, we fully integrated
the commercial teams from the acquired Codman Neurosurgery business.

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies products are sold through directly employed sales representatives,
distributors focused on their respective surgical specialties and strategic partners. During 2018, we completed the
expansion of our sales channels by establishing dedicated teams for the extremity orthopedics, acute wound
reconstruction, outpatient wound care and surgical reconstruction markets.

Integra is committed to delivering high quality products that positively impact the lives of millions of
patients and their families. We focus on four key pillars: 1) building an execution-focused culture, 2) achieving
relevant scale, 3) improving agility and innovation, and 4) leading in customer excellence. We believe that by
sharpening our focus on these areas through improved planning and communication, optimization of our
infrastructure, and strategically aligned tuck-in acquisitions, we can build scale, increase competitiveness and
achieve our long-term goals.

We aim to achieve growth in our revenues while maintaining strong financial results. While we pay
attention to any meaningful trend in our financial results, we pay particular attention to measurements that are

37

indicative of long-term profitable growth. These measurements include (1) revenue growth (including organic
growth and acquisitions), (2) gross margins on total revenues, (3) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
and amortization, (4) earnings per diluted share of common stock, and (5) operating cash flows.

To this end, our executive leadership team has established the following key priorities aligned to this

strategy:

•

Strategic Acquisitions. An important part of our strategy is pursuing strategic transactions and licensing
agreements that increase relevant scale in the clinical areas in which we compete. In 2018, integrating
the Codman Neurosurgery business, which was acquired from Johnson and Johnson in the previous
year, remained a top priority and we will continue to transition the business throughout 2019. This
acquisition expanded our portfolio of neurosurgery products and established us as the world leader in
neurosurgery. It has also enabled us to bring our entire Integra portfolio to a global market.

• Portfolio Optimization and New Product Introductions. We are investing in innovative product
development
to drive a multi-generational pipeline for our key product franchises. Our product
development efforts focus on regenerative technologies and other projects with the potential for
significant returns on investment. In 2018, we achieved significant milestones in research and
development by successfully launching nine new products. In addition to new product development, we
are funding studies to gather clinical evidence to support launches, ensure market access and improve
reimbursement for existing products. We also continue to identify low-growth, low-margin products
and product franchises for discontinuation and will continue to look at other ways of optimizing our
portfolio.

• Commercial Channel Investments. With acquisitions, new product introductions and a broader portfolio
of products, investing in our sales channels is a core part of our strategy to create specialization and
greater focus on reaching our customers and addressing their needs. Internationally, we have increased
our commercial resources significantly in all markets and are making investments to support our sales
organization and maximize our commercial opportunities. We now have a strong international sales
channel that will deliver our current portfolio as well as position us for expansion. In addition, we
continue to build upon our leadership brands across our product franchises to enable us to engage
hospital systems through enterprise-wide contracts.

• Customer Excellence. We aspire to be ranked as a best-in-class provider and are committed to
strengthen our relationships with all customers. We strive to consistently deliver outstanding customer
in technologies, systems and processes to improve the way our
service and continue to invest
customers do business with us. Additionally, we expect to build on the success of our professional
education programs to drive continued customer appreciation of our growing portfolio of medical
technologies globally.

Equity Offering

In May 2018, the Company commenced and closed on a public offering of common stock. The Company
issued 6.0 million shares of common stock and received total proceeds, net of underwriting fees and offering
expenses of approximately $349.6 million. The net proceeds from the offering were used to reduce outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit portion of the Company’s Senior Credit Facility.

Clinical and Product Development Activities

We continue to invest in collecting clinical evidence to support our existing products and new product
launches, and to ensure that we obtain market access for broader and more cost-effective solutions. In 2017, we
introduced seven new regenerative technology products, including new sizes of PriMatrix ® and OmniGraft ®,
and our largest electromechanical product, the CUSA ® Clarity. In 2018, we launched the CUSA ® Clarity
platform in Japan, AmnioExcel ® Plus, Integra ® XT ankle revision system and Panta ® II in the U.S. We

38

continue to work on advanced shoulder products and are developing a pyrocarbon hemi shoulder product to add
to our orthopedic reconstruction portfolio. We launched Panta ® II outside the U.S. during the first quarter of
2019. Panta ® II is a new fusion nail used in ankle fixation. In our electromechanical technologies portfolio, we
are focused on the development of core clinical applications and anticipate a steady flow of product launches in
early 2019, including the introduction of a new electrosurgery generator, a next generation ICP monitor platform
and an innovative customer-centric toolkit for our Certas ™ valve along with additional shunt configurations. We
continue to work with several instrument partners to bring new surgical instrument patterns to the market,
enabling us to add new instruments with minimal expense and invest in ongoing development, such as in LED
technology.

FDA Untitled Letter

On June 22, 2015, the FDA issued an Untitled Letter (the “Untitled Letter”) alleging that BioD LLC’s
(“BioD”) morselized amniotic membrane tissue based products do not meet the criteria for regulation as HCT/Ps
solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Services Act (“Section 361”) and that, as a result, BioD would
need a biologics license to lawfully market those morselized products. Since the issuance of the Untitled Letter,
BioD and more recently the Company have been in discussions with the FDA to communicate their disagreement
with the FDA’s assertion that certain products are more than minimally manipulated. The FDA has not changed
its position that certain of the BioD acquired products are not eligible for marketing solely under Section 361.

In November 2017, the FDA issued the final guidance document related to human tissue titled, “Regulatory
Considerations for Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and
Homologous Use” (the “HCT/P Final Guidance”). The HCT/P Final Guidance maintains the FDA’s position that
products such as the Company’s morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products do not meet the criteria
for regulation solely as HCT/Ps. In addition, the FDA articulated a risk-based approach to enforcement and,
while some uses for amniotic membrane tissue-based products would have as much as thirty-six months of
enforcement discretion, other high risk uses could be subject to immediate enforcement action. The Company
does not believe the uses for its amniotic membrane tissue-based products fall into the high-risk category. As of
February 26, 2019 the Company has not received any further notice of enforcement action from the FDA
regarding its morselized amniotic tissue-based products. Nonetheless, we can make no assurances that the FDA
will continue to exercise its enforcement discretion with respect
to the Company’s morselized amniotic
membrane tissue-based products, and any potential action of the FDA could have a financial impact regarding the
sales of such products. The Company has been considering and continues to consider regulatory approval
pathways for its morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products.

Revenues from BioD morselized amniotic material-based products for the year ended December 31, 2018

were less than 1.0% of consolidated revenues.

ACQUISITIONS & DIVESTITURES

Acquisitions

Our growth strategy includes the acquisition of businesses, assets or products lines to increase the breadth of
our offerings and reach of our product portfolios and drive relevant scale to our customers. As a result of several
recent acquisitions, our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2018 may not be directly comparable to
those of the corresponding prior-year periods. See Note 4—Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results, to our
consolidated financial statements for a further discussion.

Johnson & Johnson’s Codman Neurosurgery Business

On May 11, 2017, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with
DePuy Synthes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“DePuy Synthes”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson &

39

Johnson, pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire certain assets, and assume certain liabilities, of
Johnson & Johnson’s Codman neurosurgery business (the “Codman Acquisition”). The assets and liabilities
subject to the Codman Acquisition relate to the research, development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution
and sale of certain products used in connection with neurosurgery procedures.

On October 2, 2017, based upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement,
the Codman Acquisition was completed. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company paid an
aggregate purchase price of $1.014 billion, subject to adjustments set forth in the Purchase Agreement relating to
the book value of inventory transferred to us at the closing of the Codman Acquisition, the book value of certain
inventory retained by DePuy Synthes that will be transferred to the Company in the future along with certain
prepaid taxes.

Derma Sciences

On February 24, 2017,

the Company executed the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger
Agreement”) under which the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Derma Sciences, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Derma Sciences”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $210.8 million including
payment of certain of Derma Sciences’ closing expenses and settlement of stock-based compensation plans of
$4.8 million and $4.3 million, respectively. The purchase price consisted of a cash payment to the former
shareholders of Derma Sciences of approximately $201.7 million upon the closing of the transaction.

Derma Sciences is a tissue regeneration company focused on advanced wound and burn care that offers
products to help manage chronic and hard-to-heal wounds, especially those resulting from diabetes and poor
vascular functioning.

Divestitures

On September 8, 2017, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an asset purchase agreement
(the “Divestiture Agreement”) with Natus Medical Incorporated (“Natus”), pursuant to which the Company
agreed to divest its Camino Intracranial Pressure monitoring and the U.S. rights to the fixed pressure shunts
businesses together with certain of the neurosurgery assets that were acquired as part of the Codman Acquisition
(the “Divestiture”). The Divestiture Agreement was entered in connection with the review of the Codman
Acquisition by the Federal Trade Commission and the antitrust authority of Spain. The Divestiture was
conditioned upon completion of the Codman Acquisition.

On October 6, 2017, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Divestiture Agreement (see
Note 4—Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results ), the Divestiture was completed and Natus paid an aggregate
purchase price of $46.4 million. Revenues related to the Divestiture included in the Company’s financial results
for the period ended December 31, 2017 was $27.0 million.

OPTIMIZATION AND INTEGRATION ACTIVITIES

As a result of our ongoing acquisition strategy and significant growth in recent years, we have undertaken
cost-saving initiatives to consolidate manufacturing operations, distribution facilities and transfer activities,
implement a common ERP system, eliminate duplicative positions, realign various sales and marketing activities,
and expand and upgrade production capacity for our regenerative technology products. These efforts are expected
to continue and while we expect a positive impact from ongoing restructuring, integration, and manufacturing
transfer and expansion activities, such results remain uncertain.

40

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

Our net income from continuing operations in 2018 was $60.8 million, or $0.72 per diluted share, as
compared to $64.7 million, or $0.82 per diluted share in 2017, and $74.6 million, or $0.94 per diluted share, in
2016.

Revenues from 2016 to 2018 increased $480.4 million, generating $258.0 million of additional gross margin
over that time period resulting primarily from the businesses that we acquired and organic growth. Costs and
expenses increased sequentially as new employees, especially in selling, general and administrative functions,
joined the Company as a result of acquisitions. In addition, integration expenses in 2018 and 2017 increased from
2016 as a result of the businesses we acquired.

The benefit from income taxes in 2017 was primarily driven by a re-measurement of our deferred taxes
resulting from a reduction of the federal statutory rate from 35% to 21% from the 2017 Tax Act and a decrease in
income before income taxes in 2017 resulting from acquisition and integration costs related to the Derma
Sciences and the Codman Neurosurgery acquisitions.

Special Charges

Income before taxes includes the following special charges:

Acquisition and integration-related charges (1)
Structural optimization charges
Impairment charges
Litigation matters
Global ERP implementation charges
Hurricane Maria charges
Discontinued product lines charges
Convertible debt non-cash interest

Total

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

$ 93,926
19,598
4,941
4,598
—
—
—
—

(In thousands)
$117,947
7,461
3,290
—
2,780
2,758
1,156
—

$18,898
9,240
—
—
15,585
—
—
8,075

$123,063

$135,392

$51,798

(1) The amounts have been reduced by $2.6 million in 2017, representing gain on sale of business to Natus. See
Note 4, Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results, of our consolidated financial statements for more information.

The items reported above are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:

Cost of goods sold
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Interest expense
Other income

Total

41

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

$ 34,563
—
87,709
—
791

(In thousands)
$ 28,413
—
107,361
—
(382)

$18,869
200
24,654
8,075
—

$123,063

$135,392

$51,798

We typically define special charges as items for which the amounts and/or timing of such expenses may
vary significantly from period to period, depending upon our acquisition, integration and restructuring activities,
and for which the amounts are non-cash in nature, or for which the amounts are not expected to recur at the same
magnitude. We believe that given our ongoing strategy of seeking acquisitions, our continuing focus on
rationalizing our existing manufacturing and distribution infrastructure and our continuing review of various
product lines in relation to our current business strategy, some of the special charges discussed above could recur
with similar materiality in the future.

We believe that the separate identification of these special charges provides important supplemental
information to investors regarding financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of
operations. Investors may find this information useful in assessing comparability of our operating performance
from period to period, against the business model objectives that management has established, and against other
companies in our industry. We provide this information to investors so that they can analyze our operating results
in the same way that management does and to use this information in their assessment of our core business and
valuation of Integra.

Revenues and Gross Margin

Our revenues and gross margin on product revenues were as follows:

Segment Net Sales
Codman Specialty Surgical
Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies

Total revenues
Cost of goods sold

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

$ 963,929
508,512

(In thousands)
$ 720,301
467,935

1,472,441
571,496

1,188,236
435,511

$632,524
359,551

992,075
349,089

Gross margin on total revenues

$ 900,945

$ 752,725

$642,986

Gross margin as a percentage of total revenues

61.2%

63.3%

64.8%

Revenues

Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2018,

total revenues increased by $284.2 million, or 23.9%,

to
$1,472.4 million from $1,188.2 million during the prior year. Domestic revenues increased $151.6 million, or
to $1,045.9 million and were 71.0% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018.
17.0%,
International revenues increased to $426.6 million, compared to $293.9 million during 2017. The increase
compared to the prior year primarily resulted from the full-year sales impact of products acquired as part of the
Codman Neurosurgery acquisition, which resulted in incremental revenue of $235.6 million, a $3.8 million
favorable impact of foreign exchange as well as growth in both segments of $71.8 million, which includes twelve
months of Derma Sciences revenue in 2018, offset by $27.0 million of revenue from divested products in 2017.

Codman Specialty Surgical revenues were $963.9 million, an increase of 33.8% from the prior-year period.
The increase primarily resulted from incremental revenues from Codman Neurosurgery of $235.6 million.
Growth in our legacy Neurosurgery portfolio was primarily driven by our CUSA ® capital and disposables
portfolio and dural repair. Revenues for Precision Tools and Instruments increased by low-single digits over the
prior period due to increased volume in the business.

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies revenues were $508.5 million, an increase of 8.7% from the prior-year
period. In our Wound Reconstruction portfolio used in inpatient and outpatient procedures, sales of our Integra

42

skin products including PriMatrix, and amniotic tissue products, increased mid-double digits. Revenues for
Private Label increased by mid-single digits over the prior period due to increased volume in the business. In our
Extremity Orthopedics business, sales declined low-single digits driven by a decline in our lower fixation
portfolio offset by growth in our shoulder and ankle portfolios.

With our global reach, we generate revenues in multiple foreign currencies. Accordingly, we will experience

currency exchange risk with respect to those foreign currency denominated revenues.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2016.

For

the year ended December 31, 2017,

revenues increased by $196.2 million, or 20%,
total
to $1,188.2 million from $992.1 million during the prior year. Domestic revenues increased by $128.7 million,
or 17%, to $894.3 million and were 75% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017. International
revenues increased to $293.9 million, compared to $226.5 million during 2016. Foreign exchange fluctuations
had a positive impact of $2.4 million on revenues for the year.

Codman Specialty Surgical revenues were $720.3 million, an increase of 14% from the prior year. The
increase primarily resulted from one quarter of revenues from Codman Neurosurgery of $76.9 million. Growth in
our legacy Neurosurgery portfolio was also driven by our CUSA ® capital and disposables. Precision Tools and
Instruments increased by low-single digits over the prior period due to increased volume in the business.

Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies revenues were $467.9 million, an increase of 30% from the prior year.
The increase largely resulted from the impact of
the 2017 acquisition of Derma Sciences, which
added $84.6 million incremental revenue in the period. We also saw increases in our Wound Reconstruction
portfolio, Extremity Orthopedics business and Private Label business driven by strong demand for our skin
products and continued relationships with customers.

With our global reach, we generate revenues in multiple foreign currencies. Accordingly, we experience

currency exchange risk with respect to those foreign currency denominated revenues.

Gross Margin

Gross margin as a percentage of revenues was 61.2% in 2018, 63.3% in 2017, and 64.8% in 2016. The
decrease in gross margin percentage of total revenue from 2017 to 2018 resulted primarily from dilution related
to full-year product sales from the Codman Neurosurgery acquisition at lower margins than the Company’s
historical average. Additionally, there were higher net costs associated with amortization for technology-based
intangible assets recorded in connection with the Codman Neurosurgery acquisition.

The decrease in gross margin percentage of total revenue from 2016 to 2017 resulted primarily from dilution
related to product sales from the Codman Neurosurgery acquisition at lower margins than the Company’s
average. Additionally, there were higher net costs associated with fair value inventory purchase accounting
adjustments from the Codman Neurosurgery and Derma Sciences acquisitions and amortization for technology-
based intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisitions.

Other Operating Expenses

The following is a summary of other operating expenses as a percent of total revenues:

Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Intangible asset amortization

43

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

5.9%
5.3%
5.3%
46.9% 52.5% 45.9%
1.4%
1.7%

1.4%

Total operating expenses, which consist of research and development expenses, selling, general and
increased $82.0 million or 12% to

administrative expenses, and intangible asset amortization expense,
$789.9 million in 2018, compared to $707.9 million in the prior year.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development totaled $78.0 million in 2018, compared to
$63.5 million in 2017 and $58.2 million in 2016. Similar to the prior year, the increase in research and
development costs from 2017 to 2018 primarily resulted from the full-year impact of the acquisitions of Derma
Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery and additional spending on new product development and clinical studies.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the year
ended December 31, 2018 increased by $66.7 million or 10.7% to $690.7 million, compared to $624.1 million in
the same period in the prior year. Selling and marketing expenses increased by $72.3 million, primarily resulting
from the full-year impact of the Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery acquisitions, higher headcount in our
sales force compared to the prior year, higher commission costs resulting from increases in revenue and channel
expansion. General and administrative costs decreased by $5.6 million, primarily resulting from one-time costs
for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to acquiring and integrating the Derma Sciences and Codman
Neurosurgery businesses in the year of acquisition.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased by
$168.5 million or 37.0% to $624.1 million, compared to $455.6 million in 2016. Selling and marketing expenses
increased by $63.9 million, primarily resulting from the Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery acquisitions,
higher headcount in our sales force compared to the prior year, and higher commission costs resulting from
increases in revenue. General and administrative costs increased by $104.6 million, primarily resulting from the
costs related to acquiring and integrating the Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery businesses and
increased compensation costs.

INTANGIBLE ASSET AMORTIZATION. Amortization expense (excluding amounts reported in cost of
product
in the year ended December 31, 2018 was
$21.2 million, compared to $20.4 million in 2017. The increase primarily resulted from the full-year impact of
amortization on the intangible assets added as part of the Derma Sciences acquisition.

technology-based intangible assets)

revenues for

In 2017, amortization expense (excluding amounts reported in cost of product revenues for technology-
based intangible assets) in the year ended December 31, 2017 was $20.4 million, compared to $13.9 million in
2016. The increase primarily resulted from amortization on the intangible assets added as part of our Derma
Sciences acquisition.

impairment charges or accelerated amortization. We expect

We may discontinue certain products in the future as we continue to assess the profitability of our product
lines. As our profitability assessment evolves, we may make further decisions about our trade names and incur
additional
total annual amortization expense
(including amounts reported in cost of product revenues, but excluding any possible future amortization
associated with acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”)) to be approximately $66.2 million in
2019, $65.9 million in 2020, $64.8 million in 2021, $61.3 million in 2022, $60.4 million in 2023 and
$596.6 million thereafter.

44

Non-Operating Income and Expenses

The following is a summary of non-operating income and expenses:

Interest income
Interest expense
Other income, net

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands)

$ 2,800
(64,683)
8,288

$

255
(35,019)
1,345

$

24
(25,803)
845

Total non-operating income and expense

$(53,595)

$(33,419)

$(24,934)

Interest Income and Interest Expense

Interest income increased in 2018 as compared to 2017 primarily due to the interest rate differential on
cross-currency swaps designated as net investment hedges. These cross-currency swaps were consummated
during the fourth quarter of 2018. Interest income was minimal in 2017 and 2016.

Interest expense was $64.7 million, $35.0 million and $25.8 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Interest expense increased in 2018 as compared to 2017 and 2016 primarily resulting from an increase in our
weighted average interest rate and the full-year impact of increased borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility
to fund the acquisitions of Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery in 2017. As of December 31, 2018 and
2017, our weighted average interest rate was 3.9% and 3.6%, respectively.

Interest expense increased in 2017 as compared to 2016 primarily because of increased borrowings under
our Senior Credit Facility to fund the acquisitions of Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery. This increase
was offset by non-cash interest in 2016 related to the accounting for convertible securities of $8.1 million.

Our reported interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 included $6.3 million,

$2.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of non-cash amortization of debt issuance costs.

Other Income, Net

Other income of $8.3 million in 2018 was primarily due to the full-year impact of the interest rate
differential on cross-currency swaps designated as cash flow hedges. These cross-currency swaps were
consummated during the fourth quarter of 2017. Other income increased in 2017, as compared to 2016, primarily
due to the gain on sale of Natus in 2017 offset by losses on sales of short-term investments acquired from Derma
Sciences and transactional foreign exchange losses.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was (5.9)%, (468.7)% and 17.5% of income before income taxes in 2018,
2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 12, “Income Taxes,” in our consolidated financial statements for a
reconciliation of the United States federal statutory rate to our effective tax rate.

In 2018,

the Company’s higher worldwide effective tax rate, as compared to 2017, was primarily
attributable to an increase in the Company’s income before taxes and the continuing impact of complying with
the 2017 Tax Act. The Company recorded a $2.0 million expense related to GILTI and a $0.9 million expense
related to nondeductible executive compensation; both resulting from changes made by the 2017 Tax Act.

The 2017 Tax Act included numerous changes to existing U.S. tax laws that have and will continue to
impact the Company. The most notable change was a reduction in the federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%.

45

In 2017, the lower effective tax rate was primarily driven by a tax benefit of $43.4 million as a result of the
re-measurement of deferred taxes using this reduced federal tax rate. In addition, the Company’s income before
taxes decreased in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily resulting from the acquisition and integration costs related
to the 2017 acquisitions of Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery.

In 2016, our lower worldwide effective tax rate, as compared to 2015, was primarily attributable to an
excess tax benefit of $3.8 million as a result of early adoption of the new share-based compensation accounting
guidance ( ASU 2016-09 ), a favorable jurisdictional income mix, significantly lower non-deductible acquisition
costs versus the prior year, and a benefit of $0.5 million for a Federal research credit study.

Our effective tax rate could vary from year to year depending on, among other factors, tax law changes, the
geographic and business mix and taxable earnings and losses. We consider these factors and others, including our
history of generating taxable earnings, in assessing our ability to realize deferred tax assets. We estimate the
range of our worldwide effective income tax rate for 2019 to be approximately 18.5% to 19.0%.

We recorded a cumulative valuation allowance of $7.0 million against the remaining $104.9 million of gross
deferred tax assets recorded at December 31, 2018. Our deferred tax asset valuation allowance decreased by
$1.0 million in 2018 and increased by $4.4 million in 2017. This valuation allowance relates to deferred tax
assets for which the Company does not believe it has satisfied the more likely than not threshold for realization.
The decrease in valuation allowance in 2018 primarily results from the realization of certain deferred tax assets
related to acquisition of Derma Sciences and the impact of current year activity. If we determine that we would
be able to realize more or less than the recorded amount of net deferred tax assets, we will record an adjustment
to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance in the period such a determination is made.

At December 31, 2018, we had net operating loss carryforwards of $118.4 million for federal income tax
purposes, $34.5 million for foreign income tax purposes and $25.6 million for state income tax purposes to offset
future taxable income. The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2035, $0.9 million of the
foreign net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2025 with the remaining $33.6 million having an
indefinite carry forward period. The state net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2037.

The 2017 Tax Act imposed a one-time repatriation tax on accumulated foreign subsidiaries’ untaxed foreign
earnings (“Toll Tax”). As of December 31, 2017, we recorded income tax expense of approximately $5.5 million
as an estimate of the Toll Tax on certain foreign earnings. The calculation of the Toll Tax allows for the ability to
offset positive foreign earnings with existing foreign deficits and use of foreign tax credits. We finalized our tax
filings for 2017 and recorded a benefit of $1.0 million as an adjustment to the 2017 Toll Tax liability; resulting in
a total Toll Tax liability of $4.5 million. The Company asserts that it has the ability and intent to indefinitely
reinvest the undistributed earnings from its foreign operations unless there is a tax-free manner under which to
remit the earnings.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has not provided deferred income taxes on unrepatriated earnings
from foreign subsidiaries as they are deemed to be indefinitely reinvested. Such taxes would primarily be
attributable to foreign withholding taxes and local income taxes when such earnings are distributed. As such, the
Company has determined the tax impact of repatriating these earnings would not be material as of December 31,
2018.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 to address the application of
U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or
analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects
of the 2017 Tax Act. The Company recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings
and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and included these amounts in its consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company finalized its calculations and completed its
accounting for the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act in December 2018. The Company adjusted its

46

provisional estimate of the Toll Tax, reducing the total liability by $1.0 million, which decreased the Company’s
effective tax rate by 1.7%.

The 2017 Tax Act subjects the Company to tax on GILTI earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The
Company can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes related to GILTI or to
provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred as a period expense. The Company has
elected to account for the GILTI tax in the year the tax is incurred.

GEOGRAPHIC PRODUCT REVENUES AND OPERATIONS

We attribute revenues to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. Total revenue by major

geographic area consisted of the following:

United States
Europe
Asia Pacific
Rest of World

Total Revenues

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

$1,045,887
201,354
144,253
80,947

(In thousands)
$ 894,260
150,147
80,636
63,193

$765,608
120,588
59,985
45,894

$1,472,441

$1,188,236

$992,075

In 2018, sales to our U.S. customers increased 17.0% from the prior year. We saw increases in our Wound
Reconstruction portfolio, Private Label business, Precision Tools and Instruments business and our CUSA ®
capital and disposables portfolio which benefited from organic growth as well as the full-year impact of the
Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery acquisitions consummated in 2017. European sales increased 34.1%
in 2018 compared to the prior year, resulting primarily from the full-year impact of the Derma Sciences and
Codman Neurosurgery acquisitions as well as increases in our Wound Reconstruction portfolio. Sales to
customers in Asia Pacific and Rest of World increased 78.9% and 28.1% in 2018, respectively, compared to the
prior year, primarily driven by the full-year impact of the Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery
acquisitions.

In 2017, sales to our U.S. customers increased 16.8% from the prior year. We saw increases in our
regenerative technologies, private label, dural access and repair, advanced energy, precision tools and
instruments and extremities businesses, which benefited from organic growth as well as contributions from the
Derma Sciences and Codman Neurosurgery acquisitions. European sales increased 24.5% in 2017 compared to
the prior year, resulting primarily from increases in sales in our Codman Specialty Surgical portfolio as well as
regenerative technologies. Both areas included contributions from the Codman Neurosurgery and Derma
Sciences acquisitions. Sales to customers in Asia Pacific and Rest of World increased by 34.4% and 37.7% in
2017, respectively, compared to the prior year, primarily driven by the Derma Sciences and Codman
Neurosurgery acquisitions.

With our global reach, we generate revenues and incur operating expenses in multiple foreign currencies.
Accordingly, we will experience currencies exchange risk with respect to those foreign currency denominated
revenues and operating expenses. The Company generated revenues denominated in foreign currencies of
$332.8 million, $185.9 million and $163.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.

We will continue to assess the potential effects that changes in foreign currency exchange rates could have
on our business. However, either a strengthening or a weakening of the dollar against individual foreign
currencies could reduce future revenues and gross margins. If we believe this potential impact presents a
significant risk to our business, we may enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate this risk.

47

Additionally, we generate significant revenues outside the U.S., a portion of which are U.S. dollar-
denominated transactions conducted with customers who generate revenue in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar. As a result, currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which those customers do
business may have an impact on the demand for our products in foreign countries.

Local economic conditions, regulatory, legal or political considerations, the effectiveness of our sales
representatives and distributors, local competition and changes in local medical practice all could combine to
affect our sales into markets outside the U.S.

Relationships with customers and effective terms of sale frequently vary by country, often with longer-term

receivables than are typical in the U.S.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and Marketable Securities

We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $138.8 million and $174.9 million at December 31, 2018 and

2017, respectively.

In 2019, we anticipate that our principal uses of cash will be for support and maintenance of our existing

plants for facility automation and developments of our new Mansfield, Massachusetts manufacturing facility.

We determined that our existing cash, future cash to be generated from operations, and our remaining
$954.4 million of borrowing capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility at December 31, 2018, if
needed, will satisfy our foreseeable working capital, debt repayment and capital expenditure requirements for at
least the next twelve months after the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.

At December 31, 2018, our non-U.S. subsidiaries held approximately $110.5 million of cash and cash
equivalents that are available for use by all of our operations around the world. The Company asserts that it has
the ability and intent to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings from its foreign operations unless there is
a tax-free manner under which to remit the earnings.

Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash

Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

(In thousands)

$ 199,683
(49,705)
(180,872)
(5,203)

114,544
$
(1,221,335)
1,168,947
10,724

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$ (36,097)

$

72,880

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

We generated operating cash flows of $199.7 million, $114.5 million and $116.4 million for years ended

December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Operating cash flows in 2018 increased compared to the same period in 2017. Net income for the year,
adjusted for items included in net income which did not result in a change to our cash balance, amounted to cash
inflows of $197.9 million, compared to $115.9 million in 2017. The increase to net income, adjusted for items

48

included in net income year over year is primarily attributed to the full-year operating impact of the Derma and
Codman acquisitions consummated during 2017 and organic growth of the Company during 2018. Changes in
working capital in 2018 increased cash flows by approximately $0.3 million. Among the changes in working
capital, accounts receivable used $17.0 million of cash, inventory provided $8.3 million of cash, prepaid
expenses and other current assets provided $3.9 million of cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
current liabilities provided $3.6 million of cash and deferred revenue provided $1.5 million of cash.

Operating cash flows in 2017 decreased compared to the same period in 2016. Net income in 2017
decreased compared to 2016 due to an increase in expenses related to the acquisitions and integrations of
Codman Neurosurgery and Derma Sciences. Net income for the year, adjusted for items included in net income
which did not result in a change to our cash balance, amounted to cash inflows of $115.9 million, compared
to
by
approximately $24.2 million. Among the changes in working capital, accounts receivable used $89.7 million of
cash, inventory provided $0.1 million of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets used $33.8 million of
cash, and accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities provided $95.3 million of cash.

2016. Changes

$170.4 million

in working

decreased

capital

flows

2017

cash

in

in

Operating cash flows in 2016 decreased compared to the same period in 2015. Net income in 2016 increased
compared to 2015 due to an increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes and because of
the impact of the tax valuation allowance recorded in 2015 in conjunction with the SeaSpine spin-off, which was
a non-cash adjustment. In 2016, we also made payments of accreted interest of $42.8 million compared to
$0.4 million paid in 2015, which are included in operating activities. Net income for the year, adjusted for items
included in net income which did not result in a change to our cash balance, amounted to cash inflows of
$170.4 million, compared to $127.8 million in 2015. Changes in working capital in 2016 decreased cash flows by
approximately $11.3 million. Among the changes in working capital, accounts receivable used $17.5 million of
cash, inventory used $9.6 million of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets provided $14.9 million of
cash, and accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities used $0.4 million of cash.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid $77.7 million for capital expenditures, most of which
were directed to the expansion of our new Mansfield, Massachusetts facility and commercial expansion. We
received $26.7 million from the Codman Neurosurgery acquisition for a working capital adjustment.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid an aggregate of $1.2 billion for the acquisitions of
Codman Neurosurgery and Derma Sciences. The payment for Derma Sciences included a $210.5 million
payment of the purchase price plus a $26.6 million payment for the BioD Product Payment in May 2017
(see Note 4, Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results ). We received $17.0 million from the sale of short-term
investments acquired from Derma Sciences. We also received $46.4 million from the Divestiture to Natus in
October 2017. We paid $43.5 million in cash for capital expenditures, most of which was directed towards the
expansion of our manufacturing facilities and commercial expansion.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid $47.3 million in cash for capital expenditures, most of
which was directed to the expansion of our collagen manufacturing center, new instruments for several product
launches, facility improvements and enterprise resource planning implementation.

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

Our principal sources of cash from financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2018 were
$349.6 million from the issuance of common stock and $171.2 million in borrowings under our Senior Credit
Facility and Securitization Facility. These were offset by repayments of $660.0 million on the revolving portion
of our Senior Credit Facility, payments of $15.9 million for inventory that was included in the initial purchase
accounting for Codman Neurosurgery and $22.3 million of payments relating to contingent consideration.

49

Our principal sources of cash from financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2017 were $700.0
million under the Term Loan component of our Senior Credit Facility, and $607.0 million of borrowings under
the revolver component of our Senior Credit Facility offset by $117.0 million in repayments under our Senior
Credit Facility, and $19.0 million in debt issuance costs related to our Senior Credit Facility.

Our principal sources of cash from financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2016 were
$500.0 million under the term loan component of our Senior Credit Facility, $180.0 million of borrowings under
the revolver component of our Senior Credit Facility, and a $184.3 million repayment of the 2016 Convertible
Notes offset by $511.3 million in repayments under our Senior Credit Facility.

Working Capital

At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, working capital was $512.5 million and $473.2 million,
respectively. Working capital consists of total current assets less total current liabilities as presented in the
consolidated balance sheets.

Upcoming Debt Maturities

The first quarterly installment of the Company’s Term Loan component of its Senior Credit Facility is due
on September 30, 2019. We recorded a total of $22.5 million of the Term Loan component of the Senior Credit
Facility as a current liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement

On May 3, 2018,

the Company entered into the fifth amendment and restatement (the “May 2018
Amendment”) of its Senior Credit Facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lending banks with
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. The May 2018 Amendment extended the maturity date to
May 3, 2023 and decreased the applicable rate, as described below. The Company continues to have the
aggregate principal amount of $2.2 billion available to it through the following facilities:

i.

ii.

a $900.0 million Term Loan facility; and

a $1.3 billion revolving credit facility, which includes a $60.0 million sublimit for the issuance of
standby letters of credit and a $60.0 million sublimit for swingline loans.

In connection with the May 2018 Amendment, the Company’s maximum consolidated total leverage ratio in

the financial covenants (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) was modified to the following:

Fiscal Quarter

Execution of May 2018 Amendment through March 31, 2019
June 30, 2019 through March 31, 2020
June 30, 2020 through March 31, 2021
June 30, 2021 and thereafter

Maximum Consolidated
Total Leverage Ratio

5.50: 1.00
5.00: 1.00
4.50: 1.00
4.00: 1.00

Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to the

following:

i.

the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the amendment and restatement) in effect from time to time plus the
applicable rate (ranging from 1.00% to 1.75% ), or

ii.

the highest of:

1.

the weighted average overnight Federal funds rate, as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, plus 0.50%, or plus the applicable rate (ranging from 0% to 0.75% ),

50

2.

the prime lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. plus the applicable rate (ranging from 0%
to 0.75% ), and

3.

the one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% plus the applicable rate (ranging from 0% to 0.75% ).

The applicable rates are based on the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of
(a) consolidated funded indebtedness less cash that is not subject to any restriction on the use or investment
thereof to (b) consolidated EBITDA at the time of the applicable borrowing).

The Company will also pay an annual commitment fee (ranging from 0.15% to 0.35% ), based on the
Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio, on the amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit
facility.

We plan to utilize the Senior Credit Facility for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt
repayments and other general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there was $345.0 million and
$655.0 million outstanding, respectively, under the revolving portion of the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted
average interest rate of 4.0% and 3.7%, respectively. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there was $900.0 million
and $1.2 billion outstanding under the Term Loan component of the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted average
interest rate of 3.9% and 3.6%, respectively.

The Senior Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of

the Company’s
U.S. subsidiaries, excluding intangible assets. The Senior Credit Facility is subject to various financial and
negative covenants and at December 31, 2018 the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The
Company capitalized $4.2 million and $19.1 million of incremental financing costs in 2018 and 2017,
respectively, in connection with the modifications of the Senior Credit Facility.

the assets of

Letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled $0.6 million, respectively. There

were no amounts drawn as of December 31, 2018.

Securitization Facility

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company entered into an accounts receivable Securitization Facility
under which accounts receivable of certain domestic subsidiaries are sold on a non-recourse basis to a special
purpose entity (“SPE”), which is a bankruptcy-remote, consolidated subsidiary of the Company. Accordingly, the
assets of the SPE are not available to satisfy the obligations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. From time
to time, the SPE may finance such accounts receivable with a revolving loan facility secured by a pledge of such
accounts receivable. The amount of outstanding borrowings on the revolving loan facility at any one time is
limited to $150.0 million. The Securitization Facility agreement is for an initial three -year term and may be
extended. The agreement governing the Securitization Facility contains certain covenants and termination events.
An occurrence of an event of default or a termination event under this facility may give rise to the right of its
counterparty to terminate this facility. As of December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with the
covenants and none of the termination events had occurred. As of December 31, 2018,
the Company
had $121.2 million of outstanding borrowings under its Securitization Facility at a weighted average interest rate
of 3.4%.

The fair value of outstanding borrowings of the Senior Credit Facility’s revolving credit facility and Term
Loan component at December 31, 2018 were approximately $322.2 million and $852.1 million, respectively. The
fair value of the outstanding borrowing of the Securitization Facility at December 31, 2018 was approximately
$116.4 million. These fair values were determined by using a discounted cash flow model based on current
market interest rates available to the Company. These inputs are corroborated by observable market data for
similar liabilities and therefore classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 inputs represent
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly and are other than active market
observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities.

51

Convertible Debt and Related Hedging Activities

On December 15, 2016, the Company extinguished its 2016 Convertible Notes by paying the remaining
principal amount of $227.1 million and issued 2.9 million shares of common stock with a fair value of
$122.0 million related to excess conversion value. No gain or loss on extinguishment was recognized as a result
of the conversion. The Company also received 2.9 million shares of common stock from the exercise of call
options with hedge participants (as defined below) with a fair value of $123.1 million at the date of the exercise.
The shares of common stock received from the exercise of the call options were held as treasury stock as of
December 31, 2016 at a weighted average price of $41.78 per share for a total of $123.1 million.

The 2016 Convertible Notes were issued on June 15, 2011 with the aggregate principal of $230.0 million
and maturity date of December 15, 2016. The 2016 Convertible Notes bore interest at a rate of 1.625% per
annum payable semi-annually in arrears on December 15 and June 15 of each year. The 2016 Convertible Notes
were senior, unsecured obligations and were convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of its common stock
based on a conversion rate defined within the note agreement.

In connection with the issuance of the 2016 Convertible Notes, we entered into call transactions and warrant
transactions, primarily with affiliates of the initial purchasers of such notes (the “hedge participants”). The initial
strike price of the call transaction was approximately $28.72 per share, subject to customary anti-dilution
adjustments. The initial strike price of the warrant transaction was approximately $35.03 per share, subject to
customary anti-dilution adjustments. The strike price of the call transactions and warrant transactions has been
adjusted similar to the 2016 Convertible Notes as a result of the spin-off of the Company’s spine business in July
2015 to $26.42 per share and $32.22 per share, respectively. The warrants expired on a series of expiration dates
from March 2017 to August 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the hedge participants exercised
8,707,202 warrants, and, as a result, the Company issued 2,839,743 shares of common stock for the year ended
December 31, 2017. The Company has no warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2018.

Share Repurchase Plan

On December 11, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $225 million of
the Company’s common stock. The program allows the Company to repurchase its shares opportunistically from
time to time. The repurchase authorization expires in December 2020. Purchases may be affected through one or
more open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions, transactions structured through investment
banking institutions, or a combination of the foregoing. This stock repurchase authorization replaces the previous
$150 million stock repurchase authorization which was approved by the Board in 2016.

There have been no shares of common stock repurchased by the Company under any of these authorizations

in the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our formation. Our Senior Credit Facility
limits the amount of dividends that we may pay. Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on our
common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flows and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

52

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of December 31, 2018, we were obligated to pay the following amounts under the following agreements:

Senior Credit Facility—Revolver (1)
Senior Credit Facility—Term Loan
Securitization Facility (1)
Interest (2)
Employment Agreements (3)
Operating Leases (4)
Purchase Obligations
Others

Total

Payments Due by Calendar Year

Total

2019

2020-2021

2022-2023 Thereafter

(In millions)

$ 345.0
900.0
121.2
136.8
4.0
169.8
13.4
12.0

$ — $ — $ 345.0
776.3
101.2
22.5
—
— 121.2
37.8
64.3
—
1.0
24.2
26.3
—
1.8
1.3
1.3

34.7
3.0
16.8
11.6
6.1

$ —
—
—
—
—
102.5
—
3.3

$1,702.2

$94.7

$317.1

$1,184.6

$105.8

(1) The Company may borrow and make payments against the Revolving Credit Facility and Securitization

Facility from time to time and considers all of the outstanding amounts to be long-term based on its current
intent and ability to repay the borrowing outside the next twelve-month period.

(2) As the Revolving Credit Facility and Securitization Facility can be repaid at any time, no interest has been

included in the calculation.

(3) Amounts shown under Employment Agreements do not include compensation resulting from a change in

control.

(4) During 2018, the Company entered into a lease for a new corporate headquarters in Princeton, NJ which

will commence during the second quarter of 2019. The Company will make cumulative total payments of
approximately $67.0 million over the term of the lease.

Excluded from the contractual obligations table is the liability for uncertain tax benefits, including interest
and penalties, totaling $0.7 million. The Company has excluded its contingent consideration obligation and above
market supply agreement liability related to prior acquisitions from the contractual obligations table above; these
liabilities had a total fair value of $0.4 million at December 31, 2018. The liabilities for uncertain tax benefits,
contingent consideration, and the above market supply agreement liability have been excluded because we cannot
make a reliable estimate of the period in which the uncertain tax benefits or contingent consideration may be
realized.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the year ended December 31, 2018 that have or are
reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
our interests.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND THE USE OF ESTIMATES

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and

53

assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates affecting amounts reported or disclosed in
the consolidated financial statements include allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns and
allowances, net realizable value of inventories, valuation of intangible assets including in-process research and
development, amortization periods for acquired intangible assets, estimates of projected cash flows and discount
rates used to value intangible assets and test goodwill and intangible assets for impairment, estimates of projected
cash flows and depreciation and amortization periods for long-lived assets, computation of taxes, computation of
valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, valuation of stock-based compensation, valuation of
pension assets and liabilities, valuation of derivative instruments, valuation of the equity component of
convertible debt instruments, valuation of debt instruments and loss contingencies. These estimates are based on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the current
circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

We believe that the following accounting policies, which form the basis for developing these estimates, are
those that are most critical to the presentation of our consolidated financial statements and require the more
difficult subjective and complex judgments:

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Receivable and Sales Returns and Allowances

We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances
where a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to us, we record an allowance against
amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount that we reasonably expect to collect. For all
other customers, we record allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past
due, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of customers or the
length of time that receivables are past due were to change, we may change the recorded amount of allowances
for doubtful accounts in the future through charges or reductions to selling, general and administrative expense.

We record a provision for estimated sales returns and allowances on revenues in the same period as the
related revenues are recorded. We base these estimates on historical sales returns and allowances and other
known factors. If actual returns or allowances differ from our estimates and the related provisions for sales
returns and allowances, we may change the provision in the future through an increase or decrease in revenues.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting of purchased materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead, are stated at the
lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. At each balance sheet date, we
evaluate ending inventories for excess quantities, obsolescence or shelf-life expiration. Our evaluation includes
the risk of
an analysis of historical sales levels by product, projections of future demand by product,
technological or competitive obsolescence for our products, general market conditions, a review of the shelf-life
expiration dates for our products, and the feasibility of reworking or using excess or obsolete products or
components in the production or assembly of other products that are not obsolete or for which we do not have
excess quantities in inventory. To the extent that we determine there are excess or obsolete quantities or
quantities with a shelf life that is too near its expiration for us to reasonably expect that we can sell those
products prior to their expiration, we adjust their carrying value to estimated net realizable value. If future
demand or market conditions are lower than our projections, or if we are unable to rework excess or obsolete
quantities into other products, we may record further adjustments to the carrying value of inventory through a
charge to cost of product revenues in the period the revision is made.

Acquisitions

Results of operations of acquired companies are included in the Company’s results of operations as of the
respective acquisition dates. Net assets acquired are recorded at fair value at the date of the acquisition. Any

54

purchase price in excess of these net assets is recorded as goodwill. The fair values of net assets acquired may be
subject to revision based on the final determination of fair values during the measurement period, which may be
up to one year from the acquisition date.

Contingent consideration is recognized at the estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent
changes to the fair value of contingent payments are recognized in earnings. Contingent payments related to
acquisitions consist of development, regulatory, and commercial milestone payments, in addition to sales-based
payments, and are valued using discounted cash flow techniques. The fair value of development, regulatory, and
commercial milestone payments reflects management’s expectations of the probability of payment and increases
or decreases as the probability of payment or expectation of timing of payments changes. The fair value of sales-
based payments is based upon probability-weighted future revenue estimates and increases or decreases as
revenue estimates or expectation of timing of payments changes.

Valuation of Goodwill

The excess of the cost over the fair value of net assets of acquired businesses is recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill is not subject to amortization, but is reviewed for impairment at the reporting unit level annually, or
more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Our assessment of the recoverability of goodwill is based upon a
comparison of the carrying value of goodwill with its estimated fair value. We review goodwill for impairment
annually as of July 31 and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill
may not be recoverable. Refer to Note 7—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for more information on
reportable segments.

Valuation of Identifiable Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets include patents, trademarks, purchased technology, and supplier and customer
relationships. Identifiable intangible assets are initially recorded at fair market value at the time of acquisition
generally using an income or cost approach. The Company capitalizes costs incurred to renew or extend the term
of recognized intangible assets and amortizes those costs over their expected useful lives.

Derivatives

We develop, manufacture, and sell medical devices globally. Our earnings and cash flows are exposed to
market risk from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. We address these risks through a risk
management program that includes the use of derivative financial instruments and operate the program pursuant
to documented corporate risk management policies. All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the
financial statements at fair value in accordance with the authoritative guidance. Under the guidance, for those
instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the hedging instrument must be designated as
a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, based on the exposure
being hedged. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has
been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, further, on the type of hedging relationship.
Our derivative instruments do not subject our earnings or cash flows to material risk, and gains and losses on
these derivatives generally offset losses and gains on the item being hedged. We have not entered into derivative
transactions for speculative purposes and from time to time, we may enter into derivatives that are not designated
as hedging instruments in order to protect the Company from currency volatility due to intercompany balances.

All derivative instruments are recognized at their fair values as either assets or liabilities on the balance
sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments, using the framework prescribed by the
authoritative guidance, by considering the estimated amount we would receive to sell or transfer these
instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account expected forward interest rates, currency exchange
rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In certain
instances, we may utilize a discounted cash flow model to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs that

55

include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, other observable inputs for the asset or
liability, and inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation
or other means.

Income Taxes

Since we conduct operations on a global basis, our effective tax rate has and will depend upon the
geographic distribution of our pre-tax earnings among locations with varying tax rates. Changes in the tax rates
of the various jurisdictions in which we operate affect our profits. In addition, we maintain a reserve for uncertain
tax benefits, changes to which could impact our effective tax rate in the period such changes are made. The
effective tax rate can also be impacted by changes in valuation allowances of deferred tax assets, and tax law
changes.

Our provision for income taxes may change period-to-period based on specific events, such as the
settlement of income tax audits and changes in tax laws, as well as general factors, including the geographic mix
of income before taxes, state and local taxes and the effects of the Company’s global income tax strategies. We
maintain strategic management and operational activities in overseas subsidiaries. See Note 12, Income Taxes, in
our consolidated financial statements for disclosures related to foreign and domestic pretax income, foreign and
domestic income tax expense (benefit) and the effect foreign taxes have on our overall effective tax rate.

We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not to be sustained
upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The amount of the accrual for which an exposure
exists is measured by determining the amount that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement of the position. Components of the reserve are classified as a long-term liability in the
consolidated balance sheets. We record interest and penalties accrued in relation to uncertain tax benefits as a
component of income tax expense.

We believe that we have identified all reasonably identifiable exposures and that the reserve we have
established for identifiable exposures is appropriate under the circumstances; however, it is possible that
additional exposures exist and that exposures will be settled at amounts different from the amounts reserved. It is
also possible that changes in facts and circumstances could cause us to either materially increase or reduce the
carrying amount of our tax reserves.

Our deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for income tax purposes, and the
temporary differences created by the tax effects of capital loss, net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely than not to be
realized. We could recognize no benefit from our deferred tax assets or we could recognize some or all of the
future benefit depending on the amount and timing of taxable income we generate in the future.

We intend to indefinitely reinvest substantially all of our foreign earnings in our foreign subsidiaries unless
there is a tax–free manner under which to remit the earnings. The current analysis indicates that we have
sufficient U.S. liquidity, including borrowing capacity, to fund foreseeable U.S. cash needs without requiring the
repatriation of foreign cash. The 2017 Tax Act imposed a Toll Tax on a deemed repatriation of undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries. One time or unusual items that may impact our ability or intent to keep the
foreign earnings and cash indefinitely reinvested include significant U.S. acquisitions, loans from a foreign
subsidiary, and changes in tax laws.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has not provided deferred income taxes on unrepatriated earnings
from foreign subsidiaries as they are deemed to be indefinitely reinvested. Such taxes would primarily be
attributable to foreign withholding taxes and local income taxes when such earnings are distributed. As such, the
Company has determined the tax impact of repatriating these earnings would not be material as of December 31,
2018.

56

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 to address the application of
U.S. GAAP in situations where a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or
analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects
of the 2017 Tax Act. The Company recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings
and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and included these amounts in its consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company applied the guidance of SAB No. 118 when
accounting for the enactment date effects of the 2017 Tax Act in 2017 and throughout 2018. The Company
finalized its calculations and completed its accounting for the income tax effect of the 2017 Tax Act in December
2018.

Loss Contingencies

We are subject to claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of our business, including claims by employees
or former employees, with respect to our products and involving commercial disputes. We accrue for loss
contingencies when it is deemed probable that a loss has been incurred and that loss is estimable. The amounts
accrued are based on the full amount of the estimated loss before considering insurance proceeds, if applicable,
and do not include an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with the loss contingency. We
consistently accrue legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with loss contingencies as those fees are
incurred by outside counsel as a period cost. Our financial statements do not reflect any material amounts related
to possible unfavorable outcomes of claims and lawsuits to which we are currently a party because we currently
believe that such claims and lawsuits are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material,
adverse effect on our financial condition. However, it is possible that these contingencies could materially affect
our results of operations, financial position and cash flows in a particular period if we change our assessment of
the likely outcome of these matters.

Pension Benefits

The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees in Austria, France,
Japan, Germany and Switzerland. Various factors are considered in determining the pension liability, including
the number of employees expected to be paid their salary levels and years of service, the expected return on plan
assets, the discount rate used to determine the benefit obligations, the timing of benefit payments and other
actuarial assumptions. If the actual results and events for the pension plans differ from current assumptions, the
benefit obligation may be over or under valued. We recognize the underfunded status of the defined benefit
pension plans as an asset or a liability in the balance sheet, with changes in the funded status recorded through
other comprehensive income in the year in which those changes occur.

The Company’s discount rates are determined by considering current yield curves representing high quality,
long-term fixed income instruments. The resulting discount rates are consistent with the duration of plan
liabilities. In 2018, the discount rate was prescribed as the current yield on corporate bonds with an average
rating of AA or AAA of equivalent currency and term to the liabilities.

The expected return on plan assets represents the average rate of return expected to be earned on plan assets
over the period the benefits included in the benefit obligation are to be paid. In developing the expected rate of
return, the Company considers returns of historical market data as well as actual returns on the plan assets. Using
this reference information, the long-term return expectations for each asset category are developed according to
the allocation among those investment categories.

The net plan assets of the pension plans are invested in common trusts as of December 31, 2018. Common
trusts are classified as Level 2 in fair value hierarchy. The fair value of common trusts are valued at net asset
value based on the fair values of the underlying investments of the trusts as determined by the sponsor of the
trusts.

57

The following weighted average assumptions were used to develop net periodic pension benefit cost and the
actuarial present value of projected pension benefit obligations for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively:

Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase

As of December 31,

2018

2017

1.00% 0.74%
3.40% 3.08%
1.70% 1.70%

A change of plus (minus) 25 basis points on expected rate of return on plan assets, with other assumptions
held constant, would have an estimated $0.1 million favorable (unfavorable) impact on pension plan costs. As of
December 31, 2018, contributions expected to be paid to the plan in 2019 is $1.9 million.

We use the corridor approach in the valuation of defined benefit pension benefit plans. The corridor
approach defers all actuarial gains and losses resulting from variances between actual results and actuarial
assumptions. Those unrecognized gains and losses are amortized when the net gains and losses exceed 10% of
the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the
year. The amount in excess of the corridor is amortized over the average remaining service period to retirement
date of active plan participants.

Stock-based Compensation

We apply the authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation. This guidance requires companies to
recognize the expense related to the fair value of their stock-based compensation awards. Stock-based
compensation expense for stock option awards is based on the grant date fair value on using the binomial
distribution model. The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock option awards, restricted stock
awards, performance stock awards and contract stock awards on a ratable basis over the requisite service period
of the award. All excess tax benefits and taxes and tax deficiencies from stock-based compensation are included
in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements for
recently adopted accounting pronouncements and recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as
of December 31, 2018.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest
rates that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. To manage the volatility
relating to these typical business exposures, we may enter into various derivative transactions when appropriate.
We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Exchange and Other Rate Risks

We operate on a global basis and are exposed to the risk that changes in foreign currency exchange rates
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We are primarily exposed to
foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to transactions and net assets denominated in euros (“EUR”),
Swiss francs (“CHF”), British pounds (“GBP”), Canadian dollars, Japanese yen, Mexican pesos, Brazilian reais,
Australian dollars and Chinese yuan. We manage the foreign currency exposure centrally, on a combined basis,

58

which allows us to net exposures and to take advantage of any natural offsets. To mitigate the impact of currency
fluctuations on transactions denominated in nonfunctional currencies, we periodically enter into derivative
financial
instruments in the form of foreign currency exchange forward contracts with major financial
institutions. We temporarily record realized and unrealized gains and losses on these contracts that qualify as
cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income, and then recognize them in other income or expense when the
hedged item affects net earnings.

From time to time, we enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage currency
exposures for transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. As a result, the
impact of foreign currency gains/losses recognized in earnings are partially offset by gains/losses on the related
foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period.

On October 1, 2018,

the Company entered into cross-currency swap agreements designated as net
investment hedges to partially offset the effects of foreign currency translation on foreign subsidiaries. The total
notional amount of our
investment hedges at December 31, 2018 was
$354.5 million and GBP 128.3 million. Under the terms of these contracts, which have been designated as net
investment hedges, we will make interest payments in GBP and receive interest in U.S. dollars and GBP. Upon
the maturity of these contracts, the Company will pay the notional amounts in EUR, GBP and CHF and receive
U.S. dollars and GBP from the counterparties.

instruments designated as net

On October 2, 2017, we entered into cross currency swap agreements to convert a notional amount of
$300.0 million equivalent to 291.2 million of Swiss Franc denominated intercompany loans into U.S. dollars.
The CHF denominated intercompany loans were the result of the purchase of intellectual property by a subsidiary
in Switzerland as part of the Codman Acquisition. The objective of these cross-currency swaps is to reduce
volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in the foreign currency exchange rate. Under the
terms of these contracts, which have been designated as cash flow hedges, we will make interest payments in
CHF and receive interest in U.S. dollars. Upon the maturity of these contracts, the Company will pay the
principal amount of the loans in Swiss Francs and receive U.S. dollars from the counterparties. The total notional
amount of our cross-currency swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges at December 31, 2018 were
$300.0 million.

On November 28, 2017, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract, with a notional amount of
$8.9 million to mitigate the foreign currency exchange risk related to certain intercompany loans denominated in
CHF. The contract was not designated as a hedging instrument. The foreign currency forward contract was
settled on September 28, 2018.

We maintain written policies and procedures governing our risk management activities. With respect to
derivatives, changes in hedged items are generally expected to be completely offset by changes in the fair value
of hedge instruments. Consequently, foreign currency exchange contracts would not subject us to material risk
due to exchange rate movements, because gains and losses on these contracts offset gains and losses on the
assets, liabilities or transactions being hedged.

The results of operations discussed herein have not been materially affected by inflation.

Interest Rate Risk

Cash and Cash Equivalents—We are exposed to the risk of interest rate fluctuations on the interest income
earned on our cash and cash equivalents. A hypothetical 100 basis points movement in interest rates applicable to
our cash and cash equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2018 would increase interest
income by
approximately $1.4 million on an annual basis. No significant decrease in interest income would be expected as
our cash balances are earning interest at rates of approximately 2 basis points. We are subject to foreign currency
exchange risk with respect to cash balances maintained in foreign currencies.

59

Debt—Our interest rate risk relates primarily to U.S. dollar LIBOR-indexed borrowings. We use interest
rate swap derivative instruments to manage our earnings and cash flow exposure to changes in interest rates.
These interest rate swaps fix the interest rate on a portion of our expected LIBOR-indexed floating-rate
borrowings. The Company held the following interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2018 (dollar amounts in
thousands):

Hedged Item

Current
Notional
Amount

Designation Date

Effective Date

Termination Date

Fixed
Interest
Rate

Floating Rate

Estimated
Fair Value

Assets
(Liabilities)

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan

$

50,000

June 22, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

1.062% 3-month USD LIBOR $

410

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan

50,000

June 22, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

1.062% 3-month USD LIBOR

415

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

50,000

July 12, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

0.825% 1-month USD LIBOR

418

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan

50,000 February 6, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2020

1.834% 3-month USD LIBOR

619

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

100,000 February 6, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2020

1.652% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,287

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

100,000 March 27, 2017 December 31, 2017

June 30, 2021

1.971% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,246

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

150,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2022 2.201% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,491

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

150,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2022 2.201% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,460

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

100,000 December 13, 2017

July 1, 2019

June 30, 2024

2.423% 1-month USD LIBOR

418

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

50,000 December 13, 2017

July 1, 2019

June 30, 2024

2.423% 1-month USD LIBOR

162

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

200,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2024 2.313% 1-month USD LIBOR

2,076

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

75,000 October 10, 2018

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2025

3.220% 1-month USD LIBOR

(2,594)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

75,000 October 10, 2018

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2025

3.199% 1-month USD LIBOR

(2,551)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

75,000 October 10, 2018

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2025

3.209% 1-month USD LIBOR

(2,568)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

100,000 December 18, 2018 December 30, 2022 December 31, 2027 2.885% 1-month USD LIBOR

(797)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan

100,000 December 18, 2018 December 30, 2022 December 31, 2027 2.867% 1-month USD LIBOR

(873)

Total interested rate

derivatives
designated as cash
flow hedge

$1,475,000

$

619

These interest rate swaps were designated as a cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2018.

The total notional amount of interest rate swaps in effect as of December 31, 2018 was $900 million. Based
on our outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2018, a 100 basis points change in interest rates would have
impacted interest expense on the unhedged portion of the debt by $4.7 million on an annualized basis.

60

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial statements and the financial statement schedule specified by this Item, together with the report

thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are presented following Item 15 of this report.

Information on quarterly results of operations is set forth in our financial statements under Note 17,

“Selected Quarterly Information—Unaudited,” to our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Management has designed our
disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2018. Based upon this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2018 to provide such
reasonable assurance.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management

is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We recognize that because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may
deteriorate.

To evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria
described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon this evaluation, management concluded that
our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 has
been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which appears herein.

61

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

62

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

PART III

The information called for by Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities relating to equity compensation plans, Item 10. Directors, Executive
Officers and Corporate Governance, Item 11. Executive Compensation, Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters, Item 13. Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence and Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services is
incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders scheduled to be held on May 16, 2019, which definitive proxy statement is expected to be filed with
the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

63

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

PART IV

(a) Documents filed as a part of this report.

1. Financial Statements.

The following financial statements and financial statement schedules are filed as a part of this report:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017

and 2016

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018,

2017 and 2016

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Financial Statement Schedule

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and

2016

F-1
F-3

F-4
F-5
F-6

F-7
F-8

F-59

All other schedules not listed above have been omitted, because they are not applicable or are not required,

or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2013, by and between Covidien Group
S.A.R.L. and Integra LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2014)

Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Medtronic,
Inc., Medtronic Xomed
Instrumentation, SAS, and Integra LifeSciences Corporation, dated as of September 12, 2014
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
October 27, 2014)

Separation and Distribution Agreement between Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and
SeaSpine Holdings Corporation, dated as of June 30, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2015)

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Patriot S1, Inc.,
TEI Biosciences Inc. and Dr. Yiannis Monovoukas, dated as of June 26, 2015 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2015)

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Patriot S2, Inc.,
TEI Medical Inc. and Dr. Yiannis Monovoukas, dated as of June 26, 2015 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2015)

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, Integra
Derma, Inc., and Derma Sciences, Inc. dated as of January 10, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2017)

Binding Offer Letter by and among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and DePuy
Synthes, Inc., dated as of February 14, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2017

64

2.7(a)

2.8

3.1(a)

3.1(b)

3.1(c)

3.1(d)

3.2(a)

3.2(b)

4.1

4.2

4.3(a)

4.3(b)

4.3(c)

Asset Purchase Agreement accepted and countersigned by DePuy Synthes, dated May 11, 2017
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
May 15, 2017)

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated September 8, 2017, between the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries and Natus Medical Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2017)

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated February 16, 1993
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(a) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005)

Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
dated May 22, 1998 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(b) to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998)

Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
dated May 17, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(c) to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)

Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
dated December 21, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2016)

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective as of May 17, 2012 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2012)

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, effective as
of December 11, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-k filed on December 12, 2018)

Purchase Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, by and between Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Wells
Fargo Securities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Indenture, dated June 15, 2011, by and between Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Credit Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing
Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Citibank FSB and SunTrust Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents, and
Royal Bank of Canada and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 29, 2005)

First Amendment, dated as of February 15, 2006, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing
Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Citibank FSB and SunTrust Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents, and
Royal Bank of Canada and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005)

Second Amendment, dated as of February 23, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing
Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Citibank FSB and SunTrust Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents, and
Royal Bank of Canada and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 27, 2007)

65

4.3(d)

4.3(e)

4.3(f)

4.3(g)

4.3(h)

4.3(i)

4.3(j)

Third Amendment, dated as of June 4, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and
L/C Issuer, Citibank, N.A., successor by merger to Citibank, FSB, as Syndication Agent and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Royal Bank of
Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2007)

Fourth Amendment, dated as of September 5, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing
Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Citibank, N.A., successor by merger to Citibank FSB, as Syndication
Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Royal
Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 6, 2007)

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2010, among Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, JP Morgan Chase Bank, as Syndication
Agent, and HSBC Bank USA, NA, RBC Capital Markets, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Fifth Third
Bank, DNB NOR Bank ASA and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 10, 2010)

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2011, among Integra
the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. as
Syndication Agent, and, HSBC Bank USA, NA, Royal Bank of Canada, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
Fifth Third Bank, DNB NOR Bank ASA, and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on July 29, 2011)

First Amendment, dated as of May 11, 2012, to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of June 8, 2011, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, the lenders party
thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and HSBC Bank, NA, Royal Bank of Canada,
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Fifth Third Bank, DNB Nor Bank ASA and TD Bank, N.A., as
Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2012)

Second Amendment, dated as of June 21, 2013,
to Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of June 8, 2011, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, the
lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and
L/C Issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and HSBC Bank USA, National
Association, Royal Bank of Canada, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Fifth Third Bank,
DNB Bank ASA and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2013)

Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2014, among Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, the other lenders party hereto, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Syndication Agent and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Royal Bank of
Canada, Citizens Bank, National Association, DNB Capital LLC, Credit Agricole-Corporate and
Investment Bank and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2014)

66

4.3(k)

4.3(l)

4.3(m)

4.3(n)

4.3(o)

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

First Amendment, dated as of December 19, 2014, to that Third Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a syndicate of lending banks, Bank
of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Syndication Agent, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Royal
Bank of Canada, Citizens Bank, National Association, DNB Capital LLC, Crédit Agricole-
Corporate and Investment Bank, and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29,
2014)
Second Amendment, dated August 28, 2015,
to that Third Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a syndicate of lending banks, Bank
of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Syndication Agent, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Royal
Bank of Canada, Citizens Bank, National Association, DNB Capital LLC, Crédit Agricole-
Corporate and Investment Bank and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 1,
2015)
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2016, among Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, the other lenders party hereto, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Securities, LLC, Citizens Bank, N.A.,
DNB Capital LLC, HSBC Bank PLC, HSBC Bank USA. N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi
UFJ, LTD., PNC Bank, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada, SunTrust Bank, TD Bank, N.A., JPMorgan
and Chase Bank, N.A., Mizuho Bank, LTD., and Bank of Nova Scotia, as Co-Documentation
Agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on December 7, 2016)
First Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 31,
2017, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a syndicate of lending banks, and Bank
of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2017)
Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2018, among Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, the other lenders party hereto, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, and PNC Bank, N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-
Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Citibank N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., DNB Bank ASA, New York Branch,
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Suntrust Bank, TD Bank, N.A., Bank of
Nova Scotia and Capital One, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2018)
Security Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation and the additional grantors party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative and collateral agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005)
Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation and the additional grantors party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative and collateral agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005)
Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, among the guarantors party
thereto and individually as a “Guarantor”), in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
and collateral agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005)
Indenture, dated June 11, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, Integra
LifeSciences Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)

67

4.8

4.9

4.10

4.11

4.12

10.1(b)

10.1(c)

10.1(d)

10.2 (a)

10.2(b)

10.3(b)

10.3(c)

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7(a)

Form of 2.75% Senior Convertible Note due 2010 (included in Exhibit 4.8) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
June 12, 2007)
Indenture, dated June 11, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, Integra
LifeSciences Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)
Form of 2.375% Senior Convertible Note due 2012 (included in Exhibit 4.10) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
June 12, 2007)
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 11, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley &
Co., Incorporated, as representatives of the several initial purchasers (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 11, 2007, among Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley &
Co., Incorporated, as representatives of the several initial purchasers (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)
Lease Modification #2 entered into as of October 28, 2005, by and between Plainsboro Associates
and Integra LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2005)
Lease Modification #3 entered into as of March 2, 2011, by and between Plainsboro Associates
and Integra LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2011)
Lease Modification #4 entered into as of April 20, 2017, by and between Plainsboro Associates
and Integra LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2017)
Equipment Lease Agreement between Medicus Corporation and the Company, dated as of June 1,
2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000)
First Amendment
to Equipment Lease Agreement between Medicus Corporation and the
Company, dated as of June 29, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010)
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Non-Employee Directors and Officers (effective prior to
February 15, 2019) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2008)*
10.3 (c) Form of Indemnification Agreement for Non-Employee Director and Officers effective
February 15, 2019. *
1996 Incentive Stock Option and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (as amended through
December 27, 1997) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 1998)*
1998 Stock Option Plan (amended and restated as of July 26, 2005) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended
September 30, 2005)*
1999 Stock Option Plan (amended and restated as of July 26, 2005) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended
September 30, 2005)*
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended on May 17, 2004) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-127488)
filed on August 12, 2005)*

68

10.7(b)

10.8(a)

10.8(b)

10.8(c)

10.9(a)

10.9(b)

10.9(c)

10.10(a)

10.10(b)

10.10(c)

10.10(d)

10.10(e)

10.11(a)

10.11(b)

10.11(c)

10.11(d)

10.11(e)

First Amendment to Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated October 26, 2005 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1,
2005)*
2000 Equity Incentive Plan (amended and restated as of July 26, 2005) (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005)*
Amendment to 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (effective as of May 17, 2012) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012)*
Amendment to 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (effective as of January 1, 2013) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012)*
2001 Equity Incentive Plan (amended and restated as of July 26, 2005) (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005)*
Amendment to 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (effective as of May 17, 2012) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012)*
Amendment to 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (effective as of January 1, 2013) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012)*
Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan effective May 19, 2010 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2010)*
Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan effective May 17,
2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)*
Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan effective January 1,
2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2013)*
Third Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan effective May 22, 2015 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2015)*
Fourth Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, effective May 23, 2017 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2017)
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 27, 2004 between the
Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)*
Amendment 2006-1, dated as of December 19, 2006, to the Second Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2006)*
to the Second Amended and Restated
Amendment 2008-1, dated as of March 6, 2008,
Employment Agreement, between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007)*
to the Second Amended and Restated
Amendment 2008-2, dated as of August 6, 2008,
Employment Agreement between Stuart M. Essig and the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008)*
to the Second Amended and Restated
Amendment 2009-1, dated as of April 13, 2009,
Employment Agreement between Stuart M. Essig and the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2009)*

69

10.11(f)

10.11(g)

10.11(h)

10.12

10.13(a)

10.13(b)

10.13(c)

10.14(a)

10.14(b)

10.14(c)

10.14(d)

10.14(e)

10.14(f)

10.14(g)

10.15

10.16

10.17(a)

10.17(b)

Letter Agreement dated May 17, 2011 between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2011)*
Letter dated December 20, 2011 from Stuart M. Essig to the Company (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2011)*
Letter Agreement dated June 7, 2012 between Stuart M. Essig and the Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2012)*
Indemnity letter agreement dated December 27, 1997 from the Company to Stuart M. Essig
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 3, 1998)*
Registration Rights Provisions for Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 1998)*
Registration Rights Provisions for Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001)*
Registration Rights Provisions for Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended
September 30, 2004)*
Amended and Restated 2005 Employment Agreement between John B. Henneman, III and the
Company dated December 19, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005)*
Amendment 2008-1, dated as of January 2, 2008, to the Amended and Restated 2005 Employment
Agreement between John B. Henneman, III and the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007)*
to the Amended and Restated 2005
Amendment 2008-2, dated as of December 18, 2008,
Employment Agreement between John B. Henneman, III and the Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 24,
2008)*
Amendment 2009-1, dated as of April 13, 2009, to the Amended and Restated 2005 Employment
Agreement between John B. Henneman, III and the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2009)*
Amendment 2010-1, dated as of October 12, 2010,
to the Amended and Restated 2005
Employment Agreement between John B. Henneman, III and the Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 12, 2010)*
Letter dated as of February 22, 2012 from John B. Henneman, III to the Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2012)*
Second Amended and Restated 2005 Employment Agreement between the Company and John B.
Henneman, III (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2014)*
Consulting Agreement, dated October 12, 2010, between the Company and Inception Surgical
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
October 12, 2010)*
Severance Agreement between Richard D. Gorelick and the Company dated as of January 3, 2012
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2013)*
Severance Agreement between Judith O’Grady and the Company dated as of January 4, 2010
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009)*
Severance Agreement between Judith O’Grady and the Company dated as of January 3, 2011
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(a) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010)*

70

10.17(c)

10.18(a)

10.18(b)

10.18(c)

10.18(d)

10.19

10.20

10.21(a)

10.21(b)

10.21(c)

10.22

10.23

10.24

10.25(a)

10.25(b)

10.26

Severance Agreement between Judith O’Grady and the Company dated as of January 3, 2012
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2011)*

Employment Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2010, between Peter J. Arduini and the Company
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
October 12, 2010)*

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated December 20, 2011 between Peter J.
Arduini and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2011)*

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Peter J.
Arduini (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on June 20, 2014)*

Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Peter J. Arduini
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on October 26, 2017)*

Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant with Eight-Year Term for Peter J. Arduini (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23,
2011)*

Letter Agreement dated February 19, 2013 between Peter J. Arduini and Integra LifeSciences
Holdings Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 25, 2013)*

Lease Contract, dated April 1, 2005, between the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company
and Integra CI, Inc. (executed on September 15, 2006) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006)

Amendment to Lease Contract dated as of November 2, 2011, between Integra CI, Inc. and Puerto
Rico Industrial Development Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2011)

Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract, dated as of April 2, 2012, between Integra CI, Inc.
and Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)

Restricted Units Agreement dated December 27, 1997 between the Company and Stuart M. Essig
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 3, 1998)*

Stock Option Grant and Agreement pursuant to 1999 Stock Option Plan dated December 22, 2000
between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001)*

Stock Option Grant and Agreement pursuant to 2000 Equity Incentive Plan dated December 22,
2000 between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001)*

Restricted Units Agreement dated December 22, 2000 between the Company and Stuart M. Essig
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 8, 2001)*

Amendment 2006-1, dated as of October 30, 2006, to the Stuart M. Essig Restricted Units
Agreement dated as of December 22, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2006)*

Stock Option Grant and Agreement pursuant to 2003 Equity Incentive Plan dated July 27, 2004
between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)*

71

10.27(a)

10.27(b)

10.27(c)

10.27(d)

10.28

10.29

10.30

10.31(a)

10.31(b)

10.31(c)

10.32

10.33

10.34(a)

10.34(b)

10.34(c)

10.34(d)

10.34(e)

10.35

Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement pursuant to 2003 Equity Incentive Plan dated July 27,
2004 between the Company and Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)*
Amendment 2006-1, dated as of October 30, 2006, to the Stuart M. Essig Contract Stock/
Restricted Units Agreement dated as of July 27, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2006)*
Amendment 2008-1, dated as of March 6, 2008, to the Stuart M. Essig Contract Stock/Restricted
Units Agreement dated as of July 27, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25(c) to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)*
Amendment 2011-1, dated as of May 17, 2011, to the Stuart M. Essig Contract Stock/Restricted
Units Agreement dated as of July 24, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011)*
Contract Stock/Units Agreement dated as of May 17, 2011 between the Company and Stuart
M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on May 23, 2011)*
Form of Amendment 2011-1 to Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreements between the Company
and Mr. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011)*
Form of Stock Option Grant and Agreement between the Company and Stuart M. Essig
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004)*
Form of Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement for Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008)*
New Form of Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement (for Annual Equity Awards) for Stuart
M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010)*
Form of Amendment 2011-1 to Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement between the Company
and Mr. Essig (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011)*
Form of Performance Stock Agreement for Stuart M. Essig (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Stuart M. Essig for 2009 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 13, 2009)*
Form of Performance Stock Agreement (Executive Officers) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 25, 2013)*
Form of Performance Stock Agreement (Executive Officers) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 29, 2016)*
Form of Performance Stock Agreement for Peter J. Arduini (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on February 29, 2016)*
Form of Performance Stock Agreement (Executive Officers) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2018) *
Form of Performance Stock Agreement for Peter J. Arduini (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2018)*
Performance Incentive Compensation Plan effective January 1, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2013)*

72

10.35(a)

10.35(b)

10.36

10.37

10.38

10.39

10.40

10.41

10.42

10.43(a)

10.43(b)

10.44(c)

10.44(d)

10.44(e)

10.45(a)

10.45(b)

10.45(c)

10.45(d)

10.45(e)

10.45(f)

First Amendment, dated as of February 15, 2017, to the Performance Incentive Compensation Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 17, 2017)
2018 Performance Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2018 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2017)
New Form of Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement pursuant to 2003 Equity Incentive Plan
(for 2011) Annual Equity Award for Stuart M. Essig) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011)*
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option and Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2005)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Non-Directors) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004)*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Directors) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004)*
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Executive Officers) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)*
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Glenn Coleman (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)*
Agreement and General Release by and between Robert Paltridge and Integra LifeSciences
Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)*
Agreement and General Release by and between Richard D. Gorelick and Integra LifeSciences
Corporation
Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2016)*
Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2017)
Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2018)*
Compensation of Directors of the Company effective May 17, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2010)*
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of the Company effective May 17, 2012 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13,
2012)*
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of the Company effective May 22, 2013 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14,
2012)*
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of the Company effective July 24, 2013 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29,
2013)*
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of the Company effective May 22, 2015 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18,
2014)*
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of the Company effective May 24, 2016 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17,
2015)*

73

10.46(a)

10.46(b)

10.46(c)

10.46(d)

10.46(e)

10.46(f)

10.46(g)

10.46(h)

10.46(i)

10.46(j)

10.46(k)

10.46(l)

10.46(m)

10.46(n)

10.46(o)

10.46(p)

10.46(q)

10.47(a)

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2003 Equity Incentive
Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)*
New Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers—Annual Vesting (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 25,
2009)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers—Annual Vesting (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012)*
New Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers—Annual Vesting (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.38(e) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers—Cliff Vesting (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers—Cliff Vesting (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012)*
New Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers—Cliff Vesting (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.38(h) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Mr. Henneman for 2008 and 2009 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2009)*
Form of Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement pursuant to 2003 Equity Incentive Plan for
Mr. Henneman (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2008)*
Form of Option Agreement for John B. Henneman, III (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2008)*
Form of Performance Stock Agreement for John B. Henneman, III (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.37(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007)*
Form of Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement (for Signing Grant) for Mr. Arduini
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
October 12, 2010)*
Form of Contract Stock/Restricted Units Agreement (for Annual Equity Awards) for Mr. Arduini
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
October 12, 2010)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Mr. Arduini (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 12, 2010)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Mr. Henneman (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 12, 2010)*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Annual Vesting) for Mr. Henneman (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.39(n) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011)*
Coleman Promotion Summary, effective December 1, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2016)*

74

10.47(b)

Davis Promotion Summary, effective December 1, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2016)*

10.48

10.49

10.50

10.51

10.52

10.53

10.54

10.55

10.56

10.57

10.58

10.59

10.60

10.61

10.62

10.63

Annual Executive Physical Medical Exam Arrangement (Incorporated by reference to the
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2013)*

Reimbursement of Legal Fees Arrangement for CFO (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2013)*

Amended and Restated Management Incentive Compensation Plan, as of January 1, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007)*

Form of 2010 Convertible Bond Hedge Transaction Confirmation, dated June 6, 2007, between
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and dealer (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)

Form of 2012 Convertible Bond Hedge Transaction Confirmation, dated June 6, 2007, between
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and dealer (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)

Form of 2010 Amended and Restated Issuer Warrant Transaction Confirmation, dated June 6,
2007, between Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and dealer (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)

Form of 2012 Amended and Restated Issuer Warrant Transaction Confirmation, dated June 6,
2007, between Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and dealer (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Call Option Transaction (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Royal Bank of Canada and Integra LifeSciences
Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Call Option Transaction (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Call Option Transaction (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
regarding the Base Call Option Transaction
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Warrant Transaction (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Royal Bank of Canada and Integra LifeSciences
Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Warrant Transaction (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Warrant Transaction (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

Letter Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Base Warrant Transaction (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
regarding the Additional Call Option Transaction
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)

75

10.64

10.65

10.66

10.67

10.68

10.69

10.70

10.71

10.72(a)

10.72(b)

10.72(c)

10.73

10.74(a)

10.74(b)

12.1

Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between Royal Bank of Canada and Integra LifeSciences
Holdings Corporation,
regarding the Additional Call Option Transaction (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
regarding the Additional Call Option Transaction
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Additional Call Option Transaction
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Additional Warrant Transaction (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between Royal Bank of Canada and Integra LifeSciences
Holdings Corporation, regarding the Additional Warrant Transaction (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and Integra
LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, regarding the Additional Warrant Transaction (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Letter Agreement, dated June 14, 2011, between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and
regarding the Additional Warrant Transaction
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation,
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011)
Piggyback Registration Rights Agreement dated December 22, 2008 between Integra LifeSciences
Holdings Corporation and George Heenan, Thomas Gilliam and Michael Evers, as trustees of The
Bruce A. LeVahn 2008 Trust and Steven M. LeVahn (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2008)
Lease Agreement between 109 Morgan Lane, LLC and Integra LifeSciences Corporation, dated
May 15, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008)
First Amendment to Lease Agreement between 109 Morgan Lane, LLC and Integra LifeSciences
Corporation, dated March 9, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
Lease Agreement dated as of July 1, 2013, between 109 Morgan Lane, LLC and Integra
LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2013)
Offer Letter between Glenn Coleman and the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 29, 2014)*
Receivables Financing Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2018, by and among Integra
Receivables LLC, Integra LifeSciences Sales LLC, as Servicer, PNC Bank, National Association,
as Administrative Agent, PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Structuring Agent, and certain lenders and
group agents that are parties thereto from time to time (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2018)
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2018, by and among Integra LifeSciences
Sales LLC, Integra LifeSciences Corporation and Integra Receivables LLC (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28,
2018)
Statement Regarding the Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Share
Dividends for the Years Ended 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 12.1 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3 ASR filed November 4, 2016)

76

18.1

18.2

21

23

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

99.1

99.2

99.3

99.4

99.5

99.6

99.7

99.8

99.9

Preferability letter of Independent Public Accounting Firm dated May 1, 2014 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 18 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2014)

Preferability Letter of Independent Public Accounting Firm dated July 31, 2012 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012)

Subsidiaries of the Company+

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP+

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002+

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002+

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002+

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002+

Letter, dated December 21, 2011, from the United States Food and Drug Administration to Integra
LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2012)

Food and Drug Administration Form FDA-483, dated July 30, 2012, relating to inspection of
Plainsboro, NJ manufacturing facility (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)

Letter, dated November 1, 2012, from the United States Food and Drug Administration to Integra
NeuroSciences Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2012)

Letter, dated February 13, 2013, from the United States Federal Drug Administration to Integra
LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 2013)

Letter, dated September 24, 2013, from the United States Federal Drug Administration to Integra
LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2013)

Food and Drug Administration Form FDA-483, dated November 26, 2013, relating to the
inspection of the Añasco Facility (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2013)

Letter, dated January 14, 2015, from the United States Food and Drug Administration to Integra
LifeSciences Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2015)

Letter, dated May 29, 2015, from the United States Food and Drug Administration to TEI
Biosciences Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015)

Letter, dated June 30, 2015, from the United States Food and Drug Administration to Integra
LifeSciences (Ireland) Limited (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015)

101.INS

101.SCH

101.CAL

101.DEF

XBRL Instance Document+#

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document+#

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document+#

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

77

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document+#

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document+#

* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ Indicates this document is filed as an exhibit herewith.
# The financial information of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2018 filed on February 26, 2019 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Parenthetical Data to the Consolidated Balance
Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity, and (vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
is furnished electronically
herewith.

The Company’s Commission File Number for Reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K is 0-26224.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

78

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly

caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS
CORPORATION

By: /s/ Peter J. Arduini

Peter J. Arduini
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 26, 2019

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by

the following persons, on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Peter J. Arduini

Peter J. Arduini

/s/ Glenn G. Coleman

Glenn G. Coleman

/s/ Jeffrey A. Mosebrook
Jeffrey A. Mosebrook

/s/ Stuart M. Essig, Ph.D.

Stuart M. Essig, Ph.D.

/s/ Rhonda Germany Ballintyn

Rhonda Germany Ballintyn

/s/ Keith Bradley, Ph.D.
Keith Bradley, Ph.D.

/s/ Barbara B. Hill

Barbara B. Hill

/s/ Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.

/s/ Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D.

Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D.

/s/ Raymond G. Murphy
Raymond G. Murphy

/s/ Christian S. Schade

Christian S. Schade

President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 26, 2019

Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 26, 2019

Vice President, Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 26, 2019

Chairman of the Board

February 26, 2019

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

79

February 26, 2019

February 26, 2019

February 26, 2019

February 26, 2019

February 26, 2019

February 26, 2019

February 26, 2019

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Integra LifeSciences Holdings
Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes and financial
statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated
financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which

it accounts for revenues from contracts with customers in 2018.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding
the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

F-1

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
February 26, 2019

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1989.

F-2

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Total revenue, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Costs and Expenses:
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible asset amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
$992,075
$1,188,236
$1,472,441

571,496
78,041
690,746
21,160

435,511
63,455
624,096
20,370

349,089
58,155
455,629
13,862

Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,361,443

1,143,432

876,735

Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Basic net income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average common shares outstanding (See Note 13):
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

110,998
2,800
(64,683)
8,288

57,403
(3,398)

60,801

0.73
0.72

$

$
$

44,804
255
(35,019)
1,345

11,385
(53,358)

115,340
24
(25,803)
845

90,406
15,842

64,743

$ 74,564

0.84
0.82

$
$

1.00
0.94

$

$
$

82,857
83,999

76,897
79,121

74,386
79,194

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 60,801

(In thousands)
$64,743

$ 74,564

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:

Change in foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(19,159)

37,454

(10,278)

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives

Unrealized derivative (loss) gain arising during period . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income . . . .

11,709
13,400

(3,425)
2,958

Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1,691)

(6,383)

1,871
—

1,871

Defined benefit pension plan—net (loss) gain arising during

period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(643)

(57)

(45)

Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(21,493)

31,014

(8,452)

Income tax benefit (expense) related to items in other comprehensive

loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(143)

2,333

(800)

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(21,636)

33,347

(9,252)

Comprehensive income, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 39,165

$98,090

$ 65,312

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,

2018

2017

(In thousands)

Current Assets:

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $3,719 and $8,882 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 138,838
265,737
280,347
90,160

$ 174,935
251,799
296,332
99,080

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill
Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

775,082
300,112
1,079,496
926,475
6,805
19,917

822,146
269,251
1,159,627
937,905
6,250
16,078

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,107,887

$3,211,257

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities:

Borrowings under senior credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable, trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term portion of contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

22,500
76,050
3,764
75,693
—
84,545

$

60,000
93,967
11,051
73,392
22,793
87,708

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings under senior credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings under securitization facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

262,552
1,210,513
121,200
57,778
80,048

348,911
1,781,142
—
65,130
53,768

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,732,091

2,248,951

Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 15)
Stockholders’ Equity:

Preferred Stock; no par value; 15,000 authorized shares; none outstanding . . . . . . .
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 240,000 authorized shares; 88,044 and 81,306

issued at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,881 and 2,912 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017,

respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

880
1,192,601

813
821,758

(120,615)
(45,443)
348,373

(121,644)
(23,807)
285,186

Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,375,796

962,306

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,107,887

$3,211,257

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60,801 $
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

64,743 $ 74,564

Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Realized loss on sale of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on disposal of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on divestiture of business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in fair value of contingent consideration and others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of accreted interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:

Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

110,730
4,941
(8,184)
20,779
6,270
—
—
1,385
—
1,214
—

(17,021)
8,300
3,933
1,052
3,588
1,504
391

88,945
3,290
(67,304)
21,550
2,722
—
2,287
6,989
(2,645)
(4,710)

72,665
—
(6,474)
17,310
2,529
8,074
—
1,765
—
(13)
— (42,786)

(89,698)
99
(33,808)
(914)
95,321
3,874
23,803

(17,518)
(9,576)
14,912
(475)
(414)
1,251
591

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

199,683

114,544

116,405

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Change in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from note receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from divestiture of business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
910
26,704
(77,741)
422
—

—
16,951
483
(1,241,946)
(43,503)
293
46,387

4,165
—
—
225
(47,328)
316
—

Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(49,705)

(1,221,335)

(42,622)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Proceeds from borrowings of long-term indebtedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments on debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash paid for contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of liability component of convertible notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of capital lease obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercised stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash taxes paid in net equity settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

171,200
(660,000)
(38,196)
349,590
—
—
(5,037)
9,392
(7,821)

680,000
1,307,000
(511,250)
(117,000)
—
(4,661)
—
—
— (184,313)
(653)
—
(4,530)
(19,043)
10,481
9,774
(4,851)
(7,123)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(180,872)

1,168,947

(15,116)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(5,203)
(36,097)
174,935

10,724
72,880
102,055

(4,744)
53,923
48,132

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 138,838 $

174,935 $ 102,055

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

Treasury Stock

Shares Amount

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Retained
Earnings

Total
Equity

Balance, January 1, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax . . . . . .
Treasury shares retirement
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement of convertible notes . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of convertible note hedge . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock through

employee stock purchase plan . . . . . . . . . .

Issuance of common stock for vesting of

share-based awards, net of shares withheld
for taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shared-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91,714
—
—
(17,830)
2,946
—

(In thousands)
(17,830) $(367,121) $1,019,670
—
—
(366,943)
(29)
123,051

—
—
367,121
—
(123,051)

$ 917
—
—
—
—
17,830
(178)
29
—
— (2,946)

$(47,902)
—
(9,252)
—
—
—

$145,879 $ 751,443
74,564
(9,252)
—
—
—

74,564
—
—
—
—

12

824
—

1

8
—

—

—
—

—

—
—

390

5,203
17,310

—

—
—

—

—
—

391

5,211
17,310

Balance, December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,666

$ 777

(2,946) $(123,051) $ 798,652

$(57,154)

$220,443 $ 839,667

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of

tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Issuance of common stock through

employee stock purchase plan . . . . . . . . . .

Issuance of common stock for vesting of

share-based awards,
net of shares withheld for taxes . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

12

788
2,840
—

—

—

—

8
28
—

—

—

—

19
—
—

—

—

—

—

—

509

1,407
—
—

723
(28)
21,902

—

64,743

64,743

33,347

—

—
—
—

—

—

—
—
—

33,347

509

2,138
—
21,902

Balance, December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

81,306

$ 813

(2,927) $(121,644) $ 821,758

$(23,807)

$285,186 $ 962,306

Adoption of Update No. 2014-09 . . . . . . . . .
Adoption of Update No. 2018-02 . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of

tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock through employee
stock purchase plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Issuance of common stock for vesting of

share-based awards,
net of shares withheld for taxes . . . . . . . . .
Equity offering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
—

—

—

700
6,038
—

—
—
—

—

—

4
60
3

—
—
—

—

—

46
—
—

—
—
—

—

—

—
—
—

—

553

1,029
—
—

52
349,529
20,709

—
—
—

1,854
532
60,801

(21,636)

—

—
—
—

—

—

—
—
—

1,854
532
60,801

(21,636)

553

1,085
349,589
20,712

Balance, December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88,044

880

(2,881)

(120,615)

1,192,601

(45,443)

348,373

1,375,796

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BUSINESS

Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware in 1989. The
Company, a world leader in medical devices, is dedicated to limiting uncertainty for surgeons through the
development, manufacturing, and marketing of cost-effective surgical implants and medical instruments. Its
products are used primarily in neurosurgery, extremity reconstruction, orthopedics and general surgery.

The Company sells its products directly through various sales forces and through a variety of other

distribution channels.

2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These financial statements and the accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to Regulation S-X under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which
are wholly owned. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. See Note 4,
Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results, for details of new subsidiaries included in the consolidation.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant
estimates affecting amounts reported or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements include allowances for
doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns and allowances, net realizable value of inventories, valuation of
intangible assets and in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), amortization periods for acquired
intangible assets, discount rates and estimated projected cash flows used to value and test impairments of long-
lived assets and goodwill, estimates of projected cash flows, depreciation and amortization periods for long-lived
assets, computation of taxes, valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, the valuation of stock-
based compensation, valuation of pension assets and liabilities, valuation of derivative instruments, and valuation
of debt instruments and loss contingencies. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the current circumstances. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain amounts from the prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified in order to conform to the

current year’s presentation.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three

months or less to be cash equivalents. These investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company
grants credit to customers in the normal course of business, but generally does not require collateral or any other
security to support its receivables.

F-8

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In
circumstances where a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to the Company, a provision
to the allowances for doubtful accounts is recorded against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable
to the amount that is reasonably expected to be collected. For all other customers, a provision to the allowances
for doubtful accounts is recorded based on factors including the length of time the receivables are past due, the
current business environment and the Company’s historical experience. Provisions to the allowances for doubtful
accounts are recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses. Account balances are charged off against
the allowance when it is probable that the receivable will not be recovered. Provision for doubtful accounts net of
recoveries, associated with accounts receivable, included in selling, general and administrative expense, were
$0.6 million, $2.0 million, and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

INVENTORIES

Inventories, consisting of purchased materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead, are stated at the
lower of cost, the value determined by the first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. Inventories consisted
of the following:

December 31,

2018

2017

(In thousands)

Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$179,885
47,715
52,747

$190,100
58,637
47,595

Total inventories, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$280,347

$296,332

At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates inventories for excess quantities, obsolescence or shelf
life expiration. This evaluation includes analysis of historical sales levels by product, projections of future
demand, the risk of technological or competitive obsolescence for products, general market conditions, a review
of the shelf life expiration dates for products, as well as the feasibility of reworking or using excess or obsolete
products or components in the production or assembly of other products that are not obsolete or for which there
are not excess quantities in inventory. To the extent that management determines there are excess or obsolete
inventory or quantities with a shelf life that is too near its expiration for the Company to reasonably expect that it
can sell those products prior to their expiration, the Company adjusts the carrying value to estimated net
realizable value.

The Company capitalizes inventory costs associated with certain products prior to regulatory approval,
based on management’s judgment of probable economic benefit. The Company could be required to expense
previously capitalized costs related to pre-approval inventory upon a change in such judgment, due to, among
other potential factors, a denial or delay of approval by necessary regulatory bodies or a decision by management
to discontinue the related development program. No such amounts were capitalized at December 31, 2018 or
2017.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment
charges. The Company provides for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the useful life. The cost of
major additions and improvements is capitalized, while maintenance and repair costs that do not improve or
extend the lives of the respective assets are charged to operations as incurred. The cost of computer software

F-9

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

developed or obtained for internal use is accounted for in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification
350-40, Internal-Use Software.

Property, plant and equipment balances and corresponding lives were as follows:

December 31,

2018

2017

Useful Lives

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and production equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surgical instrument kits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Information systems and hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture, fixtures, and office equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction-in-progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1,837
20,472
105,063
143,921
31,231
129,962
17,731
105,075

(In thousands)
1,881
$
20,243
90,329
137,914
30,511
127,946
17,394
62,967

5-40 years
1-20 years
3-20 years
4-5 years
1-7 years
1-15 years

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

555,292
(255,180)

489,185
(219,934)

Property, plant and equipment, net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 300,112

$ 269,251

Depreciation expense associated with property, plant and equipment was $44.1 million, $36.1 million, and

$31.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

CAPITALIZED INTEREST

The interest cost on capital projects, including facilities build-out and internal use software, is capitalized
and included in the cost of the project. Capitalization commences with the first expenditure for the project and
continues until the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. When no debt is incurred
specifically for a project, interest is capitalized on project expenditures using the weighted average cost of the
Company’s outstanding borrowings. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, the
Company capitalized $2.3 million and $1.1 million of interest expense into property, plant and equipment.

ACQUISITIONS

Results of operations of acquired companies are included in the Company’s results of operations as of the
respective acquisition dates. Acquired businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting,
which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions. Any
excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Transaction
costs and costs to restructure the acquired company are expensed as incurred. The operating results of the
acquired business are reflected in the consolidated financial statements after the date of acquisition. Acquired
in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) is recognized at fair value and initially characterized as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset, irrespective of whether the acquired IPR&D has an alternative future use.
Contingent consideration is recognized at the estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to
the fair value of contingent payments are recognized in selling, general and administrative expense in
consolidated statements of operations. Contingent payments related to acquisitions consist of development,
regulatory, and commercial milestone payments, in addition to sales-based payments, and are valued using
discounted cash flow techniques. The fair value of development, regulatory, and commercial milestone payments

F-10

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

reflects management’s expectations of the probability of payment and increases or decreases as the probability of
payment or expectation of timing of payments changes. The fair value of sales-based payments is based upon
probability-weighted future revenue estimates and increases or decreases as revenue estimates or expectation of
timing of payments changes.

If the acquired net assets do not constitute a business under the acquisition method of accounting, the
transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition and no goodwill is recognized. In an asset acquisition, the
amount allocated to acquired IPR&D with no alternative future use is charged to expense at the acquisition date.
Payments that would be recognized as contingent consideration in a business combination are expensed when
incurred in an asset acquisition.

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The excess of the cost over the fair value of net assets of acquired businesses is recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill is not subject to amortization but is reviewed for impairment at the reporting unit level annually, or
more frequently if impairment indicators arise. The Company’s assessment of the recoverability of goodwill is
based upon a comparison of the carrying value of goodwill with its estimated fair value. The Company reviews
goodwill for impairment annually as of July 31 and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Refer to Note 7, Goodwill and Other Intangibles for more
information.

The Company has two reportable segments with three underlying reporting units: Instruments and
Neurosurgery, under Codman Specialty Surgical and Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies. Refer to Note 16,
Segment and Geographic Information for more information on reportable segments.

When the Company acquires a business, the assets acquired, including IPR&D, and liabilities assumed are
recorded at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company’s policy defines IPR&D as the
fair value of those projects for which the related products have not received regulatory approval and have no
alternative future use. Determining the fair value of intangible assets, including IPR&D, acquired as part of a
business combination requires the Company to make significant estimates. These estimates include the amount
and timing of projected future cash flows, the discount rate used to discount those cash flows to present value,
the assessment of the asset’s life cycle, and the consideration of legal, technical, regulatory, economic, and
competitive risks. The fair value assigned to other intangible assets is determined by estimating the future cash
flows of each project or technology and discounting the net cash flows back to their present values. The discount
rate used is determined at the time of measurement in accordance with accepted valuation methodologies.

IPR&D acquired in a business combination is capitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset.
Development costs incurred after the acquisition are expensed as incurred. Upon receipt of regulatory approval,
the indefinite-lived intangible asset is then accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset and amortized on a
straight-line basis or accelerated basis, as appropriate, over its estimated useful life. If the research and debt
project is subsequently abandoned, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is charged to expense. IPR&D acquired
outside of a business combination is expensed immediately.

Due to the uncertainty associated with research and development projects, there is risk that actual results
will differ materially from the original cash flow projections and that the research and development project will
result in a successful commercial product. The risks associated with achieving commercialization include, but are
not limited to, delay or failure to obtain regulatory approvals to conduct clinical trials, delay or failure to obtain
required market clearances, delays or issues with patent issuance, or validity and litigation.

Other intangible assets include patents, trademarks, purchased technology, and supplier and customer
relationships. Identifiable intangible assets are initially recorded at fair market value at the time of acquisition
generally using an income or cost approach. The Company capitalizes costs incurred to renew or extend the term
of recognized intangible assets and amortizes those costs over their expected useful lives.

F-11

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company, including property, plant and equipment and intangible
assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets to
be held and used, a recoverability test is performed using projected undiscounted net cash flows applicable to the
long-lived assets. If an impairment exists, the amount of such impairment is calculated based on the estimated
fair value of the asset. Impairments to long-lived assets to be disposed of are recorded based upon the difference
between the carrying value and the fair value of the applicable assets.

INTEGRA FOUNDATION

The Company may periodically make contributions to the Integra Foundation, Inc. The Integra Foundation
was incorporated in 2002 exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes and qualifies under
IRC 501(c)(3) as an exempt private foundation. Under its charter, the Integra Foundation engages in activities
that promote health, the diagnosis and treatment of disease, and the development of medical science through
grants, contributions and other appropriate means. The Integra Foundation is a separate legal entity and is not a
subsidiary of the Company; therefore, its results are not included in these consolidated financial statements. The
Company contributed $0.8 million and $0.5 million to the Integra Foundation during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. There were no contributions to the Integra Foundation during 2016.
These contributions were recorded in selling, general, and administrative expense.

DERIVATIVES

The Company develops, manufactures, and sells medical devices globally, and its earnings and cash flows
are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. The Company addresses
these risks through a risk management program that includes the use of derivative financial instruments and
operates the program pursuant to documented corporate risk management policies. All derivative financial
instruments are recognized in the financial statements at fair value in accordance with the authoritative guidance.
Under the guidance, for those instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the hedging
instrument must be designated as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation, based on the exposure being hedged. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, further,
on the type of hedging relationship. The Company’s derivative instruments do not subject its earnings or cash
flows to material risk, and gains and losses on these derivatives generally offset losses and gains on the item
being hedged. The Company has not entered into derivative transactions for speculative purposes and from time
to time, the Company may enter into derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments in order to
protect itself from currency volatility due to intercompany balances.

All derivative instruments are recognized at their fair values as either assets or liabilities on the balance
sheet. The Company determines the fair value of its derivative instruments, using the framework prescribed by
the authoritative guidance, by considering the estimated amount the Company would receive to sell or transfer
these instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account: expected forward interest rates, currency
exchange rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and its creditworthiness for liabilities. In
certain instances, the Company utilizes a discounted cash flow model to measure fair value. Generally, the
Company uses inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, other observable
inputs for the asset or liability and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by
correlation or other means. The Company has classified all of its derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy because observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of its derivative
instruments. The Company classifies derivatives designated as hedges in the same category as the item being
hedged for cash flow presentation purposes.

F-12

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract that is not designated as a hedging
instrument for accounting purposes. This contract is recorded at fair value, with the changes in fair value
recognized into other income, net on the consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 6, Derivative
Instruments for more information.

FOREIGN CURRENCY

All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries which have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar
are translated at the rate of exchange at year-end, while elements of the income statement are translated at the
average exchange rates in effect during the year. The net effect of these translation adjustments is shown as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These currency translation adjustments are not
currently adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries. Foreign
currency transaction (loss) gain of $1.7 million, $(2.9) million and $0.3 million are reported in other income, net
in the statements of operations, for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are accounted for by using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. A valuation allowance is
provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
when the change is enacted.

The Company recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not to be
sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. Reserves are established for positions
that don’t meet this recognition threshold. The reserve is measured as the largest amount of benefit determined
on a cumulative probability basis that the Company believes is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate
settlement of the position. These reserves are classified as long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets
of the Company, unless the reserves are expected to be paid in cash during the next twelve months, in which case
they are classified as current liabilities. The Company also records interest and penalties accrued in relation to
uncertain tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

While the Company believes it has identified all reasonably identifiable exposures and the reserve it has
established for identifiable exposures is appropriate under the circumstances, it is possible that additional
exposures exist and that exposures may be settled at amounts different than the amounts reserved. It is also
possible that changes in facts and circumstances could cause the Company to either materially increase or reduce
the carrying amount of its tax reserve.

The Company continues to indefinitely reinvest substantially all of its foreign earnings. The current
provisional analysis indicates that the Company has sufficient U.S. liquidity, including borrowing capacity, to
fund foreseeable U.S. cash needs without requiring the repatriation of foreign cash. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(the “2017 Tax Act”), enacted in December 2017, imposed a toll tax on a deemed repatriation of undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries. One time or unusual items that may impact the ability or intent to keep the
foreign earnings and cash indefinitely reinvested include significant U.S. acquisitions, loans from a foreign
subsidiary, changes in tax laws.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 to address the application of
U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or
analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects
of the 2017 Tax Act. The Company recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings

F-13

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and included these amounts in its consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company applied the guidance of SAB No. 118 when
accounting for the enactment date effects of the 2017 Tax Act in 2017 and throughout 2018. The Company
finalized its calculations and completed its accounting for the income tax effect of the 2017 Tax Act in December
2018.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue is recognized upon the transfer of control of promised products or services to the customers in an
amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those products and
services.

Total revenue, net, includes product sales, product royalties and other revenues, such as fees received from

services.

For products shipped with FOB shipping point terms, the control of the product passes to the customer at the
time of shipment. For shipments in which the control of the product is transferred when the customer receives the
product, the Company recognizes revenue upon receipt by the customer. Certain products that the Company
produces for private label customers have no alternative use and the Company has a right of payment for
performance to date. Revenues from those products are recognized over the period that
the Company
manufactures these products, which is typically one to three months. The Company uses the input method to
measure the manufacturing activities completed to date, which depicts the progress of the Company’s
performance obligation of transferring control of goods being manufactured for private label customers.

A portion of the Company’s product revenue is generated from consigned inventory maintained at hospitals
and distributors, and also from inventory physically held by field sales representatives. For these types of
products sales, the Company retains control until the product has been used or implanted, at which time revenue
is recognized.

Revenues from sale of products and services are evidenced by either a contract with the customer or a valid
purchase order and an invoice which includes all relevant terms of sale. For product sales, invoices are generally
issued upon the transfer of control (or upon the completion of the manufacturing in the case of the private label
transactions recognized over time) and are typically payable 30 days after the invoice date. The Company
performs a review of each specific customer’s creditworthiness and ability to pay prior to acceptance as a
customer. Further, the Company performs periodic reviews of its customers’ creditworthiness prospectively.
Refer to Note 3, Revenue From Contracts With Customers for more information.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development costs, including salaries, depreciation, consultant and other external fees, and
facility costs directly attributable to research and development activities, are expensed in the period in which they
are incurred.

EMPLOYEE TERMINATION BENEFITS AND OTHER EXIT-RELATED COSTS

The Company does not have a written severance plan, and it does not offer similar termination benefits to
affected employees in all restructuring initiatives. Accordingly,
in situations where minimum statutory
termination benefits must be paid to the affected employees, the Company records employee severance costs
associated with these restructuring activities in accordance with the authoritative guidance for non-retirement
post-employment benefits. Charges associated with these activities are recorded when the payment of benefits is
probable and can be reasonably estimated. In all other situations where the Company pays out termination
benefits, including supplemental benefits paid in excess of statutory minimum amounts and benefits offered to

F-14

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

the Company records these termination costs in
affected employees based on management’s discretion,
accordance with the authoritative guidance for ASC Topic 712 Compensation-Nonretirement Benefits and ASC
Topic 420 One-time Employee Termination Benefits.

The timing of the recognition of charges for employee severance costs other than minimum statutory
benefits depends on whether the affected employees are required to render service beyond their legal notification
period in order to receive the benefits. If affected employees are required to render service beyond their legal
notification period, charges are recognized over the future service period. Otherwise, charges are recognized
when management has approved a specific plan and employee communication requirements have been met.

For leased facilities and equipment that have been abandoned, the Company records estimated lease losses
based on the fair value of the lease liability, as measured by the present value of future lease payments
subsequent to abandonment, less the present value of any estimated sublease income on the cease-use date. For
owned facilities and equipment that will be disposed of, the Company records impairment losses based on fair
value less costs to sell. The Company also reviews the remaining useful life of long-lived assets following a
decision to exit a facility and may accelerate depreciation or amortization of these assets, as appropriate.

AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND STOCK SPLIT

On October 25, 2016, the Board of Directors recommended, subject to stockholder approval, an Amendment
to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 60.0 million shares to 240.0 million shares with $0.01 per share par value, for the purpose
of, among other things, affecting a two -for-one stock split. The Stockholders approved the amendment on its
special Stockholders Meeting on December 21, 2016 and the Company filed a certificate of amendment to the
amended and restated certificate of incorporation to affect the increase in authorized share of common stock and
the two -for-one-stock split. Stockholders of record, as of the close of markets on December 21, 2016, became
entitled to receive one additional share of common stock for each share held. The shares were distributed on
January 3, 2017. No fractional shares of common stock were issued as a result of the two -for-one stock split. The
adjusted stock price was reflected on the NASDAQ stock market on January 4, 2017.

The shares of common stock retained a par value of $0.01 per share. Accordingly, the stockholders’ equity
reflects the stock split by reclassifying from “Additional paid-in capital” to “Common stock” in an amount equal
to the par value of the increased shares resulting from the stock split. All share and per share amounts of common
stock contained in the Company’s financial statements have been restated for all periods to give retroactive effect
to the stock split.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation. This guidance requires
companies to recognize the expense related to the fair value of their stock-based compensation awards. Stock-
based compensation expense for stock option awards are based on the grant date fair value using the binomial
distribution model. The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock option awards, restricted stock
awards, performance stock awards and contract stock awards over the requisite service period of the award. All
excess tax benefits and taxes and tax deficiencies from stock-based compensation are included in provision for
income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations. Refer to Note 9, Stock-based Compensation for more
information.

PENSION BENEFITS

The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees in Austria, France,
Japan, Germany and Switzerland. Various factors are considered in determining the pension liability, including

F-15

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

the number of employees expected to be paid their salary levels and years of service, the expected return on plan
assets, the discount rate used to determine the benefit obligations, the timing of benefit payments and other
actuarial assumptions.

Retirement benefit plan assumptions are reassessed on an annual basis or more frequently if changes in
circumstances indicate a re-evaluation of assumptions are required. The key benefit plan assumptions are the
discount rate and expected rate of return on plan assets. The discount rate is based on average rates on bonds that
matched the expected cash outflows of the benefit plans. The expected rate of return is based on historical and
expected returns on the various categories of plan assets.

Total contributions to the defined benefit plans were $1.7 million and $0.5 million during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017. There were no contributions to the defined benefit plans for the year ended
December 31, 2016.

The Company uses the corridor approach in measuring the amount of net periodic benefit pension cost to
recognize each period. The corridor approach defers all actuarial gains and losses resulting from variances
between actual results and actuarial assumptions. Those unrecognized gains and losses are amortized when the
net gains and losses exceed 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the projected benefit
obligation at the beginning of the year. The amount in excess of the corridor is amortized over the average
remaining service period to retirement date of active plan participants.

CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist
principally of cash and cash equivalents, which are held at major financial institutions, investment-grade
marketable debt securities and trade receivables.

The Company’s products are sold on an uncollateralized basis and on credit terms based upon a credit risk
assessment of each customer. A portion of the Company’s trade receivables to customers outside the United
States includes sales to foreign distributors, who then sell to government owned or supported healthcare systems.

None of the Company’s customers accounted for 10% or more of the consolidated net sales during the years

ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES ADOPTED

In May 2014, the FASB issued Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised
goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should 1) identify the
contract(s) with a customer, 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, 3) determine the transaction
price, 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and 5) recognize revenue
when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This update became effective for all annual periods and
interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted Topic 606 as of January 1,
2018 using the modified retrospective method. The Company applies the practical expedient as defined in
Topic 606 to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the
amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. These
costs which are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses are consistent with the accounting
prior to the adoption of Topic 606. The Company also elected to use the practical expedient to not adjust the
promised amount of consideration for the effects of the time value of money for contracts in which the
anticipated period between when the Company transfers the goods or services to the customer and when the
customer pays is equal to one year or less. See Note 3, Revenues from Contracts with Customers, for further
information.

F-16

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

In August 2016, the FASB issued Update No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments. The guidance addresses the classification of cash flows related to debt repayment or extinguishment
costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or debt instruments with coupon rates that are insignificant in
relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after business
combinations, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims and corporate-owned life insurance, distributions
received from equity method investees and beneficial interests in securitization transaction. This update became
effective for all annual periods and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company
adopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance had no
significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued Update No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than
Inventory. The guidance requires that the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than
inventory be recognized as a current-period income tax expense or benefit and removes the requirement to defer
and amortize the consolidated tax consequences of intra-entity transfers. The new standard became effective for
all annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2016-16 effective January 1,
2018. The adoption of this guidance had no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued Update No. 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715):
Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The
guidance requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other
compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other
components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service
cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations if one is presented. If a separate line item or
items were to be used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be
appropriately described. If a separate line item or items is/are not used, the line item or items used in the income
statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. In addition, the amendments also
allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. The new standard
became effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted
ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018. The Company recognized the components of net periodic benefit cost
in the consolidated statements of
other than the service cost component
operations. The adoption of this guidance had no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.

in other (expense) income, net

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification
Accounting. The update serves to provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and
complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, to a change to the
terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The new standard became effective for all annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 effective January 1, 2018. The
adoption of this guidance had no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017,

the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted
Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This update amends the hedge accounting rules to simplify
the application of hedge accounting guidance and better portray the economic results of risk management
activities in the financial statements. The guidance expands the ability to hedge non-financial and financial risk
components, reduces complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk, eliminates the requirement
to
separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, as well as eases certain hedge effectiveness assessment
requirements. This update will become effective for all annual periods and interim reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt
ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2017 using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of this guidance
had no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-17

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

In February 2018,

the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This amendment allows a reclassification from accumulated other
comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the 2017 Tax Act (as defined
in Note 12, Income Taxes). This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt the ASU 2018-02 effective
January 1, 2018, which resulted in the reclassification of $0.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive
loss to retained earnings related to a net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES NOT YET ADOPTED

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under current accounting guidance,
an entity is not required to report operating leases on the balance sheet. The amendment requires that lessees
recognize virtually all of its leases on the balance sheet by recording a right-of-use asset and lease liability (other
than leases that meet the definition of a “short-term lease”). This update will become effective for all annual
periods and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company will adopt this standard
on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method. The Company is currently finalizing the changes to
its processes, systems and controls which are necessary to support recognition and disclosure under the new lease
standard. The estimated impact of recording a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases will
increase total assets and total liabilities 2% and 4% respectively, when considering the balances of total assets
and total liabilities as of December 31, 2018. During 2018, the Company entered into a lease for a new corporate
headquarters in Princeton, NJ which will commence during the second quarter of 2019. The estimated impact
above excludes the impact of this lease. The Company will make cumulative total payments of approximately
$67.0 million over the term of the lease.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU Number 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements. This
update provides entities with an additional and optional transition method to adopt ASU Number 2016-02 with a
cumulative-effect adjustment in the period of adoption. This update also provides guidance for a practical
expedient that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease components.
Additionally, in July 2018, the FASB issued ASU Number 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842,
Leases. This update provides additional guidance on the new lease model with improvements in numerous
implicit rates, reassessment of lease
aspects of the guidance in ASC 842 including, but not
classification, terms and purchase options, investment tax credits, and various other transition guidance. The
Company will adopt this ASU concurrently with ASU Number 2016-02.

limited to,

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-
General (Subtopic 715-20). The new guidance modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans,
including removing certain previous disclosure
requirements, adding certain new disclosure requirements, and clarifying certain other disclosure requirements.
The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company plans to early adopt ASU 2018-14 on January 1,
2019. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as Benchmark Interest Rate for
Hedge Accounting Purposes. This ASU permits use of the OIS rate based on the SOFR as a U.S. benchmark
interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018 (fiscal 2020), and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new
guidance must be applied on a prospective basis. The Company plans to early adopt ASU 2018-16 on January 1,
2019. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.

F-18

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

There are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material effect on

the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Cash paid for interest during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $58.3 million (net of
$2.3 million that was capitalized into construction in progress), $32.3 million (net of $1.1 million that was
capitalized into construction in progress) and $57.2 million (net of $1.0 million that was capitalized into
construction in progress), respectively. Cash paid for interest during the year ended December 31, 2016 includes
a $42.8 million payment of accreted interest associated with convertible notes issued in 2016.

In December 2016, the Company settled convertible notes issued in 2011 and issued 2.9 million shares of
common stock with a fair value of $122.0 million. The Company also received 2.9 million shares of common
stock from the exercise of call options with hedge participants with fair value of $123.1 million at the date of the
exercise which was held as treasury stock as of December 31, 2016.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 2.8 million shares of common stock due to the

exercise of 8.7 million warrants associated with convertible notes issued in 2011.

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was

$10.4 million, $14.6 million and $4.3 million, respectively.

Property and equipment purchases included in liabilities at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were

$5.4 million, $7.8 million and $4.7 million, respectively.

3. REVENUES FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

Summary of Accounting Policies on Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized upon the transfer of control of promised products or services to the customers in an
amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those products and
services.

Total revenue, net, includes product sales, product royalties and other revenues, such as fees received from

services.

For products shipped with FOB shipping point terms, the control of the product passes to the customer at the
time of shipment. For shipments in which the control of the product is transferred when the customer receives the
product, the Company recognizes revenue upon receipt by the customer. Certain products that the Company
produces for private label customers have no alternative use and the Company has a right of payment for
performance to date. Revenues from those products are recognized over the period that
the Company
manufactures these products, which is approximately one to three months. The Company uses the input method
to measure the manufacturing activities completed to date, which depicts the progress of the Company’s
performance obligation of transferring control of goods being manufactured for private label customers.

A portion of the Company’s product revenue is generated from consigned inventory maintained at hospitals
and distributors, and also from inventory physically held by field sales representatives. For these types of
products sales, the Company retains control until the product has been used or implanted, at which time revenue
is recognized.

Revenues from sale of products and services are evidenced by either a contract with the customer or a valid
purchase order and an invoice which includes all relevant terms of sale. For product sales, invoices are generally
issued upon the transfer of control (or upon the completion of the manufacturing in the case of the private label
transactions recognized over time) and are typically payable 30 days after the invoice date. The Company

F-19

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

performs a review of each specific customer’s creditworthiness and ability to pay prior to acceptance as a
customer. Further, the Company performs periodic reviews of its customers’ creditworthiness prospectively.

Performance Obligations

The Company’s performance obligations consist mainly of transferring control of goods and services
identified in the contracts, purchase orders, or invoices. The Company has no significant multi-element contracts
with customers.

Significant Judgments

Usage-based royalties and licenses are estimated based on the provisions of contracts with customers and
recognized in the same period that the royalty-based products are sold by the Company’s strategic partners. The
Company estimates and recognizes royalty revenue based upon communication with licensees, historical
information, and expected sales trends. Differences between actual reported licensee sales and those that were
estimated are adjusted in the period in which they become known, which is typically the following quarter.
Historically, such adjustments have not been significant.

The Company estimates returns, price concessions, and discount allowances using the expected value
method based on historical trends and other known factors. Rebate allowances are estimated using the most
likely method based on each customer contract.

The Company’s return policy, as set forth in its product catalogs and sales invoices, requires the Company
to review and authorize the return of a product in advance. Upon the authorization, a credit will be issued for the
goods returned within a set amount of days from the shipment, which is generally ninety days.

The Company disregards the effects of a financing component

if the Company expects, at contract
inception, that the period between the transfer and customer payment for the good or services will be one year or
less. The Company has no significant revenues recognized on payments expected to be received more than
one year after the transfer of control of products or services to customers.

Contract Asset and Liability

Revenues recognized from the Company’s private label business that are not invoiced to the customers as a
result of recognizing revenue over time are recorded as a contract asset included in the prepaid expenses and
other current assets account in the consolidated balance sheet.

Other operating revenues may include fees received under service agreements. Non-refundable fees received
under multiple-period service agreements are recognized as revenue as the Company satisfies the performance
obligations to the other party. A portion of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations to be
satisfied in the future periods is recognized as contract liability.

F-20

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The following table summarized the changes in the contract asset and liability balances for the year ended

December 31, 2018:

Contract Asset

Total

(amounts in thousands)

Contract asset, January 1, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transferred to trade receivable of contract asset included in beginning of

$ 3,552

the year contract asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3,552)

Contract asset, net of transferred to trade receivables on contracts during

the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contract asset, December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contract Liability

Contract liability, January 1, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognition of revenue included in beginning of year contract liability . . .
Contract liability, net of revenue recognized on contracts during the

period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,193

$ 4,193

$11,059
(3,081)

4,780
(42)

Contract liability, December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$12,716

At December 31, 2018, the short-term portion of the contract liability of $3.8 million and the long-term
portion of $8.9 million were included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company is expected to recognize revenue of approximately $3.8 million in
2019, $2.8 million in 2020, $1.9 million in 2021, $1.2 million in 2022, $0.8 million in 2023, and $2.2 million
thereafter.

Shipping and Handling Fees

The Company elected to account for shipping and handling activities as a fulfillment cost rather than a
separate performance obligation. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are included as part of
the transaction price and recognized as revenue when control of underlying products is transferred to the
customer. The related shipping and freight charges incurred by the Company are included in the cost of goods
sold.

Product Warranties

Certain of the Company’s medical devices, including monitoring systems and neurosurgical systems, are
designed to operate over long periods of time. These products are sold with warranties which may extend for up
to two years from the date of purchase. The warranties are not considered a separate performance obligation. The
Company estimates its product warranties using the expected value method based on historical trends and other
known factors. The Company includes them in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet.

F-21

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Taxes Collected from Customers

The Company elected to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a
governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction
and collected by the entity from a customer.

Disaggregated Revenue

The following table presents revenues disaggregated by the major sources of revenues for the years-ended

December 31, 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):

Neurosurgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Precision Tools and Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Codman Specialty Surgical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wound Reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extremity Orthopedics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private Label . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended
December 31,
2018

Year Ended
December 31,
2017

Year Ended
December 31,
2016

(amounts in thousands)

684,148
279,781

963,929
305,465
96,688
106,359

508,512

446,994
$ 273,307

367,985
$264,539

720,301
269,068
98,876
99,991

632,524
178,524
97,067
83,960

467,935

359,551

Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,472,441

$1,188,236

$992,075

See Note 16, Segment and Geographical Information, for details of revenues based on the location of the

customer.

Effect of Adoption of ASC Topic 606

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method. Results of
operations for the reporting periods after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period
amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with Topic 605, Revenue Recognition.

The adoption of Topic 606 resulted in an increase to the opening retained earnings of $1.9 million, which
was recorded net of taxes as of January 1, 2018 to reflect the change in timing of the recognition of revenue
related to the Company’s private label business from point in time to over time during the manufacturing process
and goods in transit for which control was transferred to customers at the time of shipment. Total assets and
liabilities increased by $7.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2018.

The impact of adoption of Topic 606 to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year

ended December 31, 2018 was as follows:

Year Ended December 31, 2018

As Reported

Excluding Impact
of Topic 606

(Amounts in thousands)

Statement of Operations

Total revenue, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,472,441
571,496
(3,398)
60,801

$1,468,075
570,028
(4,119)
58,624

F-22

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The adoption of Topic 606 had no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of

December 31, 2018.

4. ACQUISITIONS AND PRO FORMA RESULTS

Johnson & Johnson’s Codman Neurosurgery Business

On February 14, 2017, the Company entered into a binding offer letter (the “Offer Letter”) with DePuy
Synthes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“DePuy Synthes”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson,
pursuant to which Integra made a binding offer to acquire certain assets, and assume certain liabilities, of
Johnson & Johnson’s Codman neurosurgery business (the “Codman Acquisition”). The assets and liabilities
subject to the proposed Codman Acquisition relate to the research, development, manufacturing, marketing,
distribution and sale of certain products used in connection with neurosurgery procedures. The purchase price for
the Codman Acquisition was $1.014 billion.

The Codman Acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of business combination
under ASC 805, Business Combinations. This method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date. During the third quarter of
2018, the Company completed the purchase accounting for the Codman Acquisition.

In connection with the closing of the Codman Acquisition, the Company and DePuy Synthes entered into
certain additional ancillary agreements, including transition services agreements, a transition manufacturing
services agreement and certain other customary agreements. Amounts accrued and due to DePuy Synthes as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $22.8 million and $25.4 million, respectively.

The Company recorded revenue for Codman Neurosurgery of approximately $312.5 million and
$76.9 million, in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The net income or loss attributable to this acquisition cannot be
identified on a stand-alone basis because it is in the process of being integrated into the Company’s operations.

The following table summarizes the final fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the

acquisition date and reflects measurement period adjustments subsequent to the acquisition date:

Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets:

Codman corporate trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Completed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Goodwill

Total assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Final Valuation

(Dollars in thousands)

74,962
30,813
8,202
41,339

162,900
375,200
342,322

1,035,738
1,730
19,917

Weighted Average Life

Indefinite
22 years

Net assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,014,091

During 2018, the Company received cash of $26.7 million from DePuy Synthes related to working capital

adjustments, which was recorded within investing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

F-23

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company recorded measurement period adjustments to goodwill totaling $4.0 million. During the first
half of 2018,
the Company adjusted goodwill by $3.2 million because of working capital adjustments
of $6.2 million that were offset by inventory adjustments of $3.0 million. During the third quarter 2018, the
Company adjusted goodwill by $0.8 million after finalizing the valuation step up of property, plant and
equipment of $5.5 million. The adjustment for property, plant and equipment was offset by completed
technology intangible asset adjustments of $4.7 million.

During the first three quarters of 2018, the Company paid $15.9 million for inventory that was included in
the initial purchase accounting. The payment was included within financing activities on the consolidated
statements of cash flows.

The Company recorded $17.3 million in cost of goods sold related to fair value inventory purchase

accounting adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Goodwill was allocated to the Codman Specialty Surgical segment. Goodwill

is the excess of the
consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the expected revenue and cost synergies
of the combined company and assembled workforce. Goodwill recognized as a result of the acquisition is
generally deductible for income tax purposes.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company wrote-off construction in progress of $6.3 million related to a
project acquired from Codman Neurosurgery that the Company decided to discontinue after the Codman
Acquisition.

Divestiture to Natus

On September 8, 2017, to facilitate the acquisition of the Codman Neurosurgery Business, the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Divestiture Agreement”) with Natus
Medical Incorporated (“Natus”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to divest its Camino® Intracranial
Pressure monitoring and the U.S. rights to its fixed pressure shunts businesses within its Codman Specialty
Surgical segment together with certain neurosurgery assets acquired as part of the Codman Acquisition, which
includes Codman U.S. dural graft
implant, external ventricular drainage catheter and cerebrospinal fluid
collection systems businesses (the “Divestiture”). The Divestiture Agreement was entered into in connection with
the review of the Codman Acquisition by the Federal Trade Commission and the antitrust authority of Spain.

On October 6, 2017, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Divestiture Agreement, the

Divestiture was completed and Natus paid an aggregate purchase price of $46.4 million.

Assets and liabilities divested consisted of the following as of October 6, 2017 (amounts in thousands):

Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 8,348
36
30,813
1,122
2,861

Total assets divested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$43,180

Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,082
209

Total liabilities divested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,291

F-24

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Assets held for sale includes assets and liabilities related to U.S. dural graft implant, external ventricular
drainage catheters and cerebrospinal fluid collection systems businesses acquired as part of acquisition of
Codman Neurosurgery.

The transitional supply agreement with Natus requires the Company to provide to Natus certain assets
defined in the transitional supply agreement upon termination. The Company recognized a liability of
$1.3 million, included in other liabilities in consolidated balance sheet, related to estimated cost of assets to be
provided to Natus upon termination of transitional supply agreement.

The Divestiture does not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s
operations and financial statements. Goodwill was allocated to the assets and liabilities divested using the relative
fair value method. The Company recognized a gain on sale of business of $2.6 million included in other income,
net in its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Derma Sciences

On February 24, 2017,

the Company executed the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger
Agreement”) under which the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Derma Sciences, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Derma Sciences”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $210.8 million,
including payment of certain of Derma Sciences’ closing expenses and settlement of stock-based compensation
plans of $4.8 million and $4.3 million, respectively. The purchase price consisted of a cash payment to the
former shareholders of Derma Sciences of approximately $201.7 million upon the closing of the transaction.

Derma Sciences is a tissue regeneration company focused on advanced wound and burn care that offers
products to help manage chronic and hard-to-heal wounds, especially those resulting from diabetes and poor
vascular functioning.

The revenue and net income or loss attributable to this acquisition cannot be identified on a stand-alone

basis because it has been integrated into the Company’s operations.

The Derma Sciences acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of business combination
under ASC 805, Business Combinations. This method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date.

F-25

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The following table summarizes the final fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the

acquisition date and reflects purchase accounting adjustments subsequent to the acquisition date:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets:

Customer relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks/brand names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Completed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-compete agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . .
Contingent liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Final Valuation

(Dollars in thousands)
$ 16,512
19,238
8,949
17,977
4,369
4,311

78,300
13,500
11,600
280
73,765
14,524
101

263,426
4,560
7,409
37,174
3,805

Weighted Average Life

14 years
15 years
14 years
1 year

Net assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$210,478

Goodwill related to the Derma Sciences acquisition was allocated to the Orthopedics and Tissue
Technologies segment. Goodwill is the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and
represents the expected revenue and cost synergies of the combined company and assembled workforce.
Goodwill recognized as a result of this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes. During the first
quarter of 2018, the Company completed its purchase accounting of Derma Sciences.

Short-term Investments

Short-term investments recognized at the acquisition date of Derma Sciences are investments in equity and
debt securities including certificates of deposit purchased with an original maturity greater than three months
which are deposited in various U.S. financial institutions and are fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. The Company considers securities with original maturities of greater than 90 days to be available
for sale securities. Securities under this classification are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses
are recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income. The estimated fair value of the available for sale
securities is determined based on quoted market prices. The Company evaluates securities with unrealized losses
to determine whether such losses, if any, are other than temporary. Short-term investments are classified as
Level 1 in fair value hierarchy. Fair values of short-term investments are determined using the unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the balance
sheet date.

F-26

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

In the second quarter of 2017, the Company sold the acquired short-term investments and recognized a

realized loss of $2.3 million included in other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations.

Deferred Taxes

The acquired deferred taxes of $14.5 million include a deferred tax asset of $39.7 million related to a federal
net operating loss which the Company expects to utilize against income in future periods and a deferred tax asset
of $16.4 million related to intangibles acquired by Derma Sciences in previous periods, offset by a deferred tax
liability of $41.1 million for new intangibles for which the Company will not receive a tax benefit and deferred
tax liability $0.5 million related to various deferred items. In the second quarter of 2017, the Company decreased
the preliminary estimated value of the net deferred tax assets by $1.5 million to reflect adjustments to
preliminary estimated fair values of assets and liabilities acquired. In fourth quarter of 2017, the Company
decreased the preliminary value of the deferred tax asset by $3.3 million to reflect returns filed for periods prior
to the acquisition date and adjustments for expected effective state tax rates.

United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Untitled Letter

On June 22, 2015, the FDA issued an Untitled Letter (the “Untitled Letter”) alleging that BioD morselized
amniotic membrane based products do not meet the criteria for regulation as human cellular tissue-based
products (“HCT/Ps”) solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and that, as a result, BioD would
need a biologics license to lawfully market those morselized products. Since the issuance of the Untitled Letter,
BioD and more recently, the Company have been in discussion with the FDA to communicate its disagreement
with the FDA’s assertion that certain products are more than minimally manipulated. The FDA has not changed
its position that certain of the BioD acquired products are not eligible for marketing solely under Section 361.

In November 2017, the FDA issued the final guidance document related to human tissue titled, “Regulatory
Considerations for Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and
Homologous Use” (the “HCT/P Final Guidance”). The HCT/P Final Guidance maintains the FDA’s position that
products such as the Company’s morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products do not meet the criteria
for regulation solely as HCT/Ps. In addition, the FDA articulated a risk-based approach to enforcement and,
while some uses for amniotic membrane tissue-based products would enjoy as much as thirty-six months of
enforcement discretion, other high risk uses could be subject to immediate enforcement action. The Company
does not believe the uses for its amniotic membrane tissue-based products fall into the high-risk category. As of
February 26, 2019, the Company has not received any further notice of enforcement action from the FDA
regarding its morselized amniotic tissue-based products. Nonetheless, the Company can make no assurances that
the FDA will continue to exercise its enforcement discretion with respect to the Company’s amniotic membrane
tissue-based products, and any potential action of the FDA could have a financial impact regarding the sales of
such products. The Company has been evaluating and is considering regulatory approval pathways for its
morselized amniotic membrane tissue-based products.

Revenues from BioD morselized amniotic material-based products for the year ended December 31, 2018

were less than 1.0% of consolidated revenues.

Contingent Consideration

The Company assumed contingent consideration incurred by Derma Sciences related to its acquisitions of
BioD and the intellectual property related to the Medihoney product. The Company accounted for the contingent
liabilities by recording their fair value on the date of the acquisition based on a discounted cash-flow model. The
contingent liabilities recognized as part of the Derma Sciences acquisition relate to the following:

i.

contractual incentive payments that could be made to former equity owners of BioD if net sales of
BioD products exceed a certain amount for the twelve-month periods ending June 30, 2017 and 2018
(“BioD Earnout Payments”);

F-27

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

ii.

iii.

a contractual incentive payment that could be made to the former equity owners if there has been no
specific enforcement action or notice by the FDA against the specific BioD products as a result of the
Untitled Letter for a certain period after closing as defined by the agreement (“Product Payment”); and

contractual incentive payments that could be made to the former owner of the intellectual property
relating to the Medihoney product line, if net sales of Medihoney products exceed certain amounts
defined in the agreement between Derma Sciences and the former owner of the intellectual property of
Medihoney for any twelve-month period (“Medihoney Earnout Payments”).

At the date of the acquisition, net sales used in estimating the BioD Earnout Payments is based on the
weighted average of different possible scenarios using revenue volatility of 13.5%. The BioD Earnout Payments
were valued using a discount rate of 3.0%. The maximum payout related to the BioD Earnout Payments is
$26.5 million. The estimated fair value as of February 24, 2017 was $9.1 million. In August 2017, the Company
paid $4.8 million for the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2017 component of the BioD Earnout Payments.
The Company made no additional payments after the final earn out period ended on June 30, 2018. As of
December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of the remaining portion of the BioD Earnout Payments was
$0.3 million.

At the date of acquisition, the Company estimated that the probability of the Product Payment was 98.0%
and valued it at a discount rate of 2.5%. The maximum payout related to the Product Payment is $29.7 million.
The estimated fair value as of February 24, 2017 was $26.8 million. In the second quarter of 2017, the Company
adjusted the preliminary estimated fair value to increase the Product Payment by $0.9 million related to
additional products that should have been included in the preliminary estimate based on the Merger Agreement.
On May 25, 2017, the Company made full payment for the Product Payment of $26.6 million. The payment was
included in cash used in business acquisition, net of cash acquired within investing activities in the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows since the payment was made shortly after the acquisition.

At the date of the acquisition, net sales used in estimating the Medihoney Earnout Payments was based on
the weighted average of different possible scenarios using revenue volatility of 27.5%. The Medihoney Earnout
Payments were valued using a discount rate of 4.5%. The maximum payout related to the Medihoney Earnout
Payments is $5.0 million. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company paid $2.0 million for the Medihoney
Earnout Payment. The estimated fair value as of December 31, 2018 was $0.2 million. The estimated fair value
as of February 24, 2017 and December 31, 2017 was $1.4 million.

These fair value measurements were based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus
represented a Level 3 measurement. Contingent consideration is re-measured to fair value at each reporting date
until the contingency is resolved, and those changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. Depending on the
expected timing of the estimated payments, the acquisition date fair values and subsequent remeasurement could
be different.

Pro Forma Results (unaudited)

The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as if the acquisitions of Codman Neurosurgery, Derma Sciences and
divestiture to Natus, which were completed by the Company during 2017 had been completed as of the beginning
2016. The pro forma results are based upon certain assumptions and estimates, and they give effect to actual
operating results prior to the acquisitions and adjustments to reflect (i) the change in interest expense,
depreciation expense, intangible asset amortization and fair value inventory step-up, (ii) timing of recognition for
certain expenses that will not be recurring in the post-acquisition period, which includes $2.9 million incurred by
Derma Sciences prior to acquisition and $24.9 million incurred by Integra, (iii) gain from the sale of business of
$2.6 million related to the Divestiture to Natus, and (iv) income taxes at a rate consistent with the Company’s

F-28

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

statutory rate at the date of the acquisitions. No effect has been given to other cost reductions or operating
synergies. As a result, these pro forma results do not necessarily represent results that would have occurred if the
acquisitions had taken place on the basis assumed above, nor are they indicative of the results of future combined
operations.

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(Pro forma)

(In thousands except per share amounts)

Total revenue from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations . . . . . . . . .

$1,428,491
81,730
$
1.06
$

$1,446,903
27,520
$
0.37
$

Consortium of Focused Orthopedists

On January 8, 2019, the Company announced that it had signed a license and development agreement with
Consortium of Focused Orthopedists, LLC, for a short stem and stemless shoulder system. The Company is
assessing the economics of the transaction and expects to complete the accounting for the transaction during the
first quarter of 2019.

5. DEBT

Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement

On May 3, 2018,

the Company entered into the fifth amendment and restatement (the “May 2018
Amendment”) of its Senior Credit Facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lending banks with
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. The May 2018 Amendment extended the maturity date to
May 3, 2023 and decreased the applicable rate, as described below. The Company continues to have the
aggregate principal amount of $2.2 billion available to it through the following facilities:

i.

ii.

a $900.0 million Term Loan facility; and

a $1.3 billion revolving credit facility, which includes a $60.0 million sublimit for the issuance of
standby letters of credit and a $60.0 million sublimit for swingline loans.

In connection with the May 2018 Amendment, the Company’s maximum consolidated total leverage ratio in

the financial covenants (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) was modified to the following:

Fiscal Quarter

Maximum Consolidated Total
Leverage Ratio

Execution of May 2018 Amendment through March 31, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 30, 2019 through March 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 30, 2020 through March 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 30, 2021 and thereafter

5.50: 1.00
5.00: 1.00
4.50: 1.00
4.00: 1.00

Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to the

following:

i.

the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the amendment and restatement) in effect from time to time plus the
applicable rate (ranging from 1.00% to 1.75% ), or

ii.

the highest of:

1.

the weighted average overnight Federal funds rate, as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, plus 0.50%, or plus the applicable rate (ranging from 0% to 0.75% ),

F-29

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

2.

the prime lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. plus the applicable rate (ranging from 0%
to 0.75% ), and

3.

the one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% plus the applicable rate (ranging from 0% to 0.75% ).

The applicable rates are based on the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of
(a) consolidated funded indebtedness less cash that is not subject to any restriction on the use or investment
thereof to (b) consolidated EBITDA at the time of the applicable borrowing).

The Company will also pay an annual commitment fee (ranging from 0.15% to 0.35% ), based on the
Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio, on the amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit
facility.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there was $345.0 million and $655.0 million outstanding, respectively,
under the revolving portion of the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 4.0% and 3.7%,
respectively. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there was $900.0 million and $1.2 billion outstanding under the
Term Loan component of the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 3.9% and 3.6%,
respectively.

The Senior Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company’s U.S.
subsidiaries, excluding intangible assets. The Senior Credit Facility is subject to various financial and negative
covenants and at December 31, 2018 the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The Company
capitalized $4.2 million and $19.1 million of incremental financing costs in 2018 and 2017, respectively, in
connection with the modifications of the Senior Credit Facility.

Contractual repayments of the Term Loan component of Senior Credit Facility are due as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Principal
Repayment

(In thousands)
$ 22,500
45,000
56,250
67,500
708,750

$900,000

The outstanding balance of revolving credit component of the Senior Credit Facility is due on May 3, 2023.

Securitization Facility

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company entered into an accounts receivable securitization facility
(the “Securitization Facility”) under which accounts receivable of certain domestic subsidiaries are sold on a
non-recourse basis to a special purpose entity (“SPE”), which is a bankruptcy-remote, consolidated subsidiary of
the Company. Accordingly, the assets of the SPE are not available to satisfy the obligations of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries. From time to time, the SPE may finance such accounts receivable with a revolving loan
facility secured by a pledge of such accounts receivable. The amount of outstanding borrowings on the
Securitization Facility at any one time is limited to $150.0 million. The Securitization Facility agreement is for
an initial three -year term and may be extended. The agreement governing the Securitization Facility contains
certain covenants and termination events. An occurrence of an event of default or a termination event under this
Securitization Facility may give rise to the right of its counterparty to terminate this facility. As of December 31,
2018, the Company was in compliance with the covenants, and none of the termination events had occurred. As

F-30

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

of December 31, 2018, the Company had $121.2 million of outstanding borrowings under its Securitization
Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 3.4%.

The fair value of outstanding borrowings of the Senior Credit Facility’s revolving credit facility and Term
Loan component at December 31, 2018 were approximately $322.2 million and $852.1 million, respectively. The
fair value of the outstanding borrowing of the Securitization facility at December 31, 2018 was approximately
$116.4 million. These fair values were determined by using a discounted cash flow model based on current
market interest rates available to the Company. These inputs are corroborated by observable market data for
similar liabilities and therefore classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 inputs represent
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly and are other than active market
observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities.

Letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled $0.6 million, respectively. There

were no amounts drawn as of December 31, 2018.

6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Interest Rate Hedging

The Company’s interest rate risk relates to U.S. dollar denominated variable interest rate borrowings. The
Company uses interest rate swap derivative instruments to manage earnings and cash flow exposure resulting
from changes in interest rates. These interest rate swaps apply a fixed interest rate on a portion of our expected
LIBOR-indexed floating-rate borrowings.

F-31

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company held the following interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2018 (dollar amounts in

thousands):

Hedged Item

Current
Notional
Amount

Designation Date

Effective Date

Termination Date

Fixed
Interest
Rate

Floating Rate

Estimated
Fair Value

Assets
(Liabilities)

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

50,000

June 22, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

1.062% 3-month USD LIBOR $

410

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000

June 22, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

1.062% 3-month USD LIBOR

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000

July 12, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

0.825% 1-month USD LIBOR

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000 February 6, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2020

1.834% 3-month USD LIBOR

415

418

619

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 February 6, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2020

1.652% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,287

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 March 27, 2017 December 31, 2017

June 30, 2021

1.971% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,246

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2022 2.201% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,491

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2022 2.201% 1-month USD LIBOR

1,460

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 December 13, 2017

July 1, 2019

June 30, 2024

2.423% 1-month USD LIBOR

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000 December 13, 2017

July 1, 2019

June 30, 2024

2.423% 1-month USD LIBOR

418

162

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

200,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2024 2.313% 1-month USD LIBOR

2,076

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,000 October 10, 2018

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2025

3.220% 1-month USD LIBOR

(2,594)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,000 October 10, 2018

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2025

3.199% 1-month USD LIBOR

(2,551)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,000 October 10, 2018

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2025

3.209% 1-month USD LIBOR

(2,568)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 December 18, 2018 December 30, 2022 December 31, 2027 2.885% 1-month USD LIBOR

(797)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 December 18, 2018 December 30, 2022 December 31, 2027 2.867% 1-month USD LIBOR

(873)

Total interest rate derivatives
designated as cash flow
hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,475,000

$

619

F-32

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company held the following interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in

thousands):

Hedged Item

3-month USD LIBOR

Current
Notional
Amount

Designation Date

Effective Date

Termination Date

Fixed
Interest
Rate

Floating Rate

Estimated
Fair Value

Assets
(Liabilities)

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

50,000

June 22, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

1.062% 3-month USD LIBOR $

675

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000

June 22, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

1.062% 3-month USD LIBOR

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000

July 12, 2016

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2019

0.825% 1-month USD LIBOR

3-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000 February 6, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2020

1.834% 3-month USD LIBOR

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 February 6, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2020

1.652% 1-month USD LIBOR

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 March 27, 2017 December 31, 2017

June 30, 2021

1.971% 1-month USD LIBOR

672

779

318

858

337

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2022 2.201% 1-month USD LIBOR

(455)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2022 2.201% 1-month USD LIBOR

(434)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100,000 December 13, 2017

July 1, 2019

June 30, 2024

2.423% 1-month USD LIBOR

(684)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,000 December 13, 2017

July 1, 2019

June 30, 2024

2.423% 1-month USD LIBOR

(255)

1-month USD LIBOR

Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

200,000 December 13, 2017

January 1, 2018 December 31, 2024 2.313% 1-month USD LIBOR

(1,219)

Total interest rate derivatives
designated as cash flow
hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,050,000

$

592

The Company designated these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of a
derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge and is highly effective are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income / (loss) until the underlying transaction affects earnings and are then reclassified to
earnings in the same account as the hedged transaction. If the hedged cash flow does not occur, or if it becomes
probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash
flow hedge to interest expense at that time.

Foreign Currency Hedging

From time to time the Company enters into foreign currency hedge contracts intended to protect the U.S.
dollar value of certain forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions. For contracts that are designated as
hedging instruments, the Company assesses the effectiveness of the contracts. The change in fair value of foreign
currency cash flow hedges are recorded in AOCI, net of tax, until the hedged item affects earnings. Once the
related hedged item affects earnings, the Company reclassifies amounts recorded in AOCI to earnings. If the
hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or if it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will
reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time. For contracts not
designated as hedging instruments, the change in fair value of the contracts are recognized in other income
(expense), net in the consolidated statements of operation, along with the offsetting foreign currency gain or loss
on the underlying assets or liabilities.

The success of the Company’s hedging program depends,

in part, on forecasts of certain activity
denominated in foreign currencies. The Company may experience unanticipated currency exchange gains or
losses to the extent that there are differences between forecasted and actual activity during periods of currency

F-33

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

volatility. In addition, changes in currency exchange rates related to any unhedged transactions may affect its
earnings and cash flows.

On November 28, 2017, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract, with a notional
amount of $8.9 million to mitigate the foreign currency exchange risk related to a certain intercompany loan
denominated in Swiss Francs (“CHF”). The contract is not designated as a hedging instrument. For the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized a $0.2 million loss and a $0.1 million gain,
respectively, from the change in fair value of the contract, which was included in other income (expense), net in
the consolidated statement of operations. The foreign currency forward contract was settled on September 28,
2018.

Cross-Currency Rate Swaps

On October 2, 2017, the Company entered into cross currency swap agreements to convert a notional
amount of $300.0 million equivalent to 291.2 million of CHF denominated intercompany loans into U.S. dollars.
The CHF denominated intercompany loans were the result of the purchase of intellectual property by a subsidiary
in Switzerland as part of the Codman Acquisition. The objective of these cross-currency swaps is to reduce
volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in the foreign currency exchange rate. Under the
terms of these contracts, which have been designated as cash flow hedges, the Company will make interest
payments in Swiss Francs and receive interest in U.S. dollars. Upon the maturity of these contracts, the Company
will pay the principal amount of the loans in Swiss Francs and receive U.S. dollars from the counterparties.

The Company held the following cross-currency rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of

December 31, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Effective Date

Termination
Date

Fixed Rate

Aggregate Notional
Amount

Fair Value
Asset (Liability)

Fair Value
Asset (Liability)

2018

2017

2017

Pay CHF . . . . . . . . October 2, October 2,
Receive U.S.$ . . .
Pay CHF . . . . . . . . October 2, October 2,
Receive U.S.$ . . .
Pay CHF . . . . . . . . October 2, October 2,
Receive U.S.$ . . .

2017

2017

2021

2022

2020

Total . . . . . . . . . . .

1.75% CHF
97,065
4.38%
$ 100,000
1.85% CHF
48,533
50,000
$
4.46%
1.95% CHF 145,598
$ 150,000
4.52%

$ (215)

$ (742)

(422)

(610)

(2,193)

(2,605)

$(2,830)

$(3,957)

The cross-currency swaps are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and changes in the fair
values are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in AOCI. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the
Company recorded a gain of $2.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in other income, net related to change in
fair value related to the foreign currency rate translation to offset the gains or losses recognized on the
intercompany loan.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded a gain of $9.1 million and loss

$2.1 million, respectively, in AOCI related to change in fair value of the cross-currency swaps.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded a gain of $7.9 million and
$1.9 million, respectively, in other income, net included in the consolidated statements of operations related to
the interest rate differential of the cross-currency swaps.

The estimated gain that is expected to be reclassified to other income, net from AOCI as of December 31,
2018 within the next twelve months is $7.6 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company does not expect any

F-34

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

gains or losses will be reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of these cash flow hedges
because the original forecasted transaction will not occur.

Net Investment Hedges

The Company manages certain foreign exchange risks through a variety of strategies, including hedging.
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk in its international operations from foreign currency
purchases, net investments in foreign subsidiaries, and foreign currency assets and liabilities created in the
normal course of business.

For net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gains and losses on the instruments arising from the
effects of foreign exchange are recorded in the currency translation adjustment component of accumulated other
comprehensive income / (loss), consistent with the underlying hedged item.

On October 1, 2018,

the Company entered into cross-currency swap agreements designated as net

investment hedges to partially offset the effects of foreign currency translation on foreign subsidiaries.

The Company held the following cross-currency rate swaps designated as net investment hedges as of

December 31, 2018 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Effective Date

Termination
Date

Fixed Rate

Aggregate Notional
Amount

Fair Value
Asset (Liability)

Pay EUR . . . . . . .
Receive U.S.$ . . .
Pay EUR . . . . . . .
Receive U.S.$ . . .
Pay EUR . . . . . . .
Receive U.S.$ . . .
Pay GBP . . . . . . .
Receive U.S.$ . . .
Pay CHF . . . . . . .
Receive GBP . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . .

October 3,
2018

October 3,
2018

October 3,
2018

October 3,
2018

October 3,
2018

September 30,
2021

September 30,
2023

September 30,
2025

September 30,
2025

September 30,
2025

—
3.01%
—
2.57%
—
2.19%
1.67%
2.71%
—
1.67%

EUR
$
EUR
$
EUR
$
GBP
$
CHF
GBP

70,738
82,000
51,760
60,000
38,820
45,000
128,284
167,500
165,172
128,284

1,359

(421)

(150)

2,360

(3,780)

$ (632)

The cross-currency swaps were carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and changes in the
fair values were recorded as unrealized gains or losses in AOCI. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the
Company recorded a gain of $1.7 million in AOCI related to the change in fair value of the cross-currency swaps.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a gain of $2.4 million in interest income
included in the consolidated statements of operations related to the interest rate differential of the cross-currency
swaps.

The estimated gain that is expected to be reclassified to interest income from AOCI as of December 31,

2018 within the next twelve months is $8.9 million.

Counterparty Credit Risk

The Company manages its concentration of counterparty credit risk on its derivative instruments by limiting
acceptable counterparties to a group of major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings, and by
actively monitoring their credit ratings and outstanding positions on an ongoing basis. Therefore, the Company

F-35

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

considers the credit risk of the counterparties to be low. Furthermore, none of the Company’s derivative
transactions are subject to collateral or other security arrangements, and none contain provisions that depend
upon the Company’s credit ratings from any credit rating agency.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The Company has classified all of its derivative instruments within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
because observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the derivative instruments. The fair
values of the interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps were developed using a market approach based on
publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the swap. The Company performs ongoing assessments of
counterparty credit risk.

The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the consolidated balance sheet for

derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

Fair Value as of December 31,

2018

2017

(In thousands)

Location on Balance Sheet (1):
Derivatives designated as hedges — Assets:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swap (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,654
7,615

$ 1,521
7,757

Net Investment Hedges

Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 8,888

$ —

Other assets

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swap (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,350

2,491

Net Investment Hedges

Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,774

$ —

Total Derivatives designated as hedges — Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$28,281

$11,769

Derivatives designated as hedge — Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swap (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ —

$ 1,845

Other liabilities

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swap (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,385
10,445

1,575
11,714

Net Investment Hedges

Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$11,294

$ —

Total Derivative designated as hedges — Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$31,124

$15,134

F-36

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(1) The Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities as current based on the cash flows expected to be

incurred within the following 12 months.

(2) At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the total notional amounts related to the Company’s interest rate swaps

were $1.5 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.

The following presents the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and net
investment hedges on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Balance in
AOCI
Beginning
of
Year

Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
AOCI

Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from
AOCI into
Earnings

Balance in
AOCI
End of
Year

(In thousands)

Location in
Statements of
Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2018

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . .

592
(5,104)

$

924
9,062

$

897
10,148

$

619 Interest income (expense)

(6,190) Other income (expense)

Net Investment Hedges

Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

1,723

2,355

(632) Interest income (expense)

$(4,512)

$11,709

$13,400

$(6,203)

Year Ended December 31, 2017

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,871
—
Cross-currency swap . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (1,355)
(2,070)

$

(76) $

592 Interest income (expense)

3,034

(5,104) Other income (expense)

$ 1,871

$ (3,425)

$ 2,958

$(4,512)

7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

During the third quarter of 2018, the Company elected to bypass the qualitative assessment for its three
reporting units and perform a quantitative test. The assumptions used in evaluating goodwill for impairment are
subject to change and are tracked against historical results by management.

The Company estimated the fair value of its three reporting units using a discounted cash flow model, which
incorporates significant estimates and assumptions made by management which, by their nature, are
characterized by uncertainty. Inputs used to fair value the Company’s reporting units are considered inputs of the
fair value hierarchy. For Level 3 measurements, significant increases or decreases in long-term growth rates or
discount rates in isolation or in combination could result
in a significantly lower or higher fair value
measurement. The key assumptions impacting the valuation included the following:

• The reporting unit’s financial projections, which are based on management’s assessment of regional
and macroeconomic variables, industry trends and market opportunities, and the Company’s strategic
objectives and future growth plans.

• The projected terminal value for the reporting unit, which represents the present value of projected cash
flows beyond the last period in the discounted cash flow analysis. The terminal value reflects the
Company’s assumptions related to long-term growth rates and profitability, which are based on several
factors, including local and macroeconomic variables, market opportunities, and future growth plans.

F-37

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

• The discount rate used to measure the present value of the projected future cash flows is set using a
weighted-average cost of capital method that considers market and industry data as well as the
Company’s specific risk factors that are likely to be considered by a market participant. The weighted-
average cost of capital is the Company’s estimate of the overall after-tax rate of return required by
equity and debt holders of a business enterprise. In performing this test, the Company utilized a
discount rate of 9.0%.

Given the excess of the estimated fair values over their carrying values, no impairment was recognized.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

Codman Specialty
Surgical

Goodwill at January 1, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derma Sciences acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Codman acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Divestment to Natus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation and other . . . . . . . . . . . .

$284,358
—
346,220
(2,861)
7,050

Orthopedics and
Tissue
Technologies

(In thousands)
$226,213
73,765
—
—
3,160

Total

$510,571
73,765
346,220
(2,861)
10,210

Goodwill at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$634,767

$303,138

$937,905

Codman acquisition measurement period

adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3,964)
(5,043)

—
(2,423)

(3,964)
(7,466)

Goodwill at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$625,760

$300,715

$926,475

Other Intangible Assets

The components of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets were as follows:

Completed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks/brand names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Codman trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supplier relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All other (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted
Average
Life

19 years
13 years
28 years
Indefinite
27 years
4 years

December 31, 2018

Accumulated
Amortization

Net

Cost

(Dollars in Thousands)

$ 855,679
231,448
104,061
162,054
34,721
10,958

$(167,384)
(106,859)
(24,764)
—
(16,519)
(3,899)

$ 688,295
124,589
79,297
162,054
18,202
7,059

$1,398,921

$(319,425)

$1,079,496

F-38

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Completed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks/brand names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Codman trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supplier relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All other (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted
Average
Life

19 years
13 years
28 years
Indefinite
27 years
4 years

December 31, 2017

Accumulated
Amortization

Net

Cost

(Dollars in Thousands)

$ 869,174
233,430
104,879
162,900
34,721
11,511

$(124,096)
(91,961)
(22,293)
—
(15,092)
(3,546)

$ 745,078
141,469
82,586
162,900
19,629
7,965

$1,416,615

$(256,988)

$1,159,627

(1) At December 31, 2018 and 2017, all other included IPR&D of $1.0 million, which was indefinite-lived.

There were no impairment charges for research and development expenses related to IPR&D projects during

2018 and 2017.

During the third quarter of 2018, the Company elected to bypass the qualitative assessment for its Codman
Tradename intangible asset and perform a quantitative test. In performing this test, the Company utilized a
discount rate of 13.0%. The assumptions used in evaluating the Codman Tradename for impairment are subject
to change and are tracked against historical results by management. Based on the results of the quantitative test,
the Company recorded no impairment to the Codman Tradename intangible asset.

During the third quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $4.9 million in cost of
goods sold related to completed technology assets acquired from Koby Ventures II, L.P dba Metasurg
(“Metasurg Technology”) due to recent contract negotiations and revised future projections. Metasurg
Technology is included in the Orthopedic and Tissue Technology segment. Of the total impairment charge
of $4.9 million, $2.5 million was related to an out-of-period adjustment included in the twelve months ended
December 31, 2018. The out-of-period adjustment is attributed to the timing of performing the impairment test
based on the contract termination associated with the intangible asset. The Company determined that the
adjustment was not material to the consolidated financial statements for any previously reported annual or
interim period and the adjustment to correct the misstatements is not material to the period ended December 31,
2018.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.3 million in cost of
goods sold related to completed technology assets acquired from Tarsus Medical, Inc. (“Tarsus Technology”),
since the underlying product will no longer be sold. Tarsus Technology was included in the Orthopedic and
Tissue Technology segment.

Amortization expense (including amounts reported in cost of product revenues, but excluding any possible
future amortization associated with acquired IPR&D) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
was $71.6 million, $52.8 million and $41.5 million, respectively. Annual amortization expense is expected to
approximate $66.2 million in 2019, $65.9 million in 2020, $64.8 million in 2021, $61.3 million in 2022,
$60.4 million in 2023 and $596.6 million thereafter. Amortization of product technology based intangible assets
totaled $50.4 million, $35.7 million and $27.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively, and is presented by the Company within cost of goods sold.

F-39

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

8. TREASURY STOCK

There were 2.9 million shares of treasury stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, with cost of
$120.6 million and $121.6 million, respectively, at a weighted average of $41.87 and $41.77 per share,
respectively.

On December 11, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $225.0 million
of the Company’s common stock. The program allows the Company to repurchase its shares opportunistically
from time to time. The repurchase authorization expires in December 2020. Purchases may be affected through
transactions structured through
one or more open market
investment banking institutions, or a combination of the foregoing. This stock repurchase authorization replaces
the previous $150.0 million stock repurchase authorization, approved by the Board in 2016.

transactions, privately negotiated transactions,

There were no treasury stock repurchases during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

9.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation expense — all related to employees and members of the Board of Directors—

recognized under the authoritative guidance was as follows:

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$18,721
1,609
449

(In thousands)
$19,785
1,273
492

$15,829
1,048
433

Total stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total estimated tax benefit related to stock-based compensation

20,779

21,550

17,310

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,430

15,448

10,569

Net effect on net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$10,349

$ 6,102

$ 6,741

Estimated tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018

does not include adjustments related to the effect of 2017 Tax Act.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The purpose of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) is to provide eligible employees of the
Company with the opportunity to acquire shares of common stock at periodic intervals by means of accumulated
payroll deductions. The ESPP is a non-compensatory plan. Under the ESPP, a total of 3.0 million shares of
common stock are reserved for issuance. These shares will be made available either from the Company’s
authorized but unissued shares of common stock or from shares of common stock reacquired by the Company as
treasury stock. At December 31, 2018, 2.0 million shares remain available for purchase under the ESPP. During
the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 16,721 shares, 12,168 shares and
12,494 shares under the ESPP for $0.7 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

EQUITY AWARD PLANS

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock
awards, contract stock awards and restricted stock unit awards outstanding under three plans, the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”), the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”), and the 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan,” and collectively, (the “Plans”)).

F-40

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

In May 2010 and May 2017, the stockholders of the Company approved amendments to the 2003 Plan to
increase by 3.5 million and 1.7 million, respectively, the number of shares of common stock that may be issued
under the 2003 Plan. The Company has reserved 4.0 million shares under each of the 2000 Plan and the
2001 Plan, and 14.7 million shares under the 2003 Plan. The Plans permit the Company to grant incentive and
non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, contract stock, performance stock, or
dividend equivalent rights to designated directors, officers, employees and associates of the Company.

Stock options issued under the Plans become exercisable over specified periods, generally within four years
from the date of grant for officers and employees, and within one year from the date of the grant for members of
the Board of Directors. The awards generally expire eight years from the grant date for employees and from six
to ten years for directors and certain executive officers. Restricted stock issued under the Plans vests ratably over
specified periods, generally three years after the date of grant.

In connection with the separation of SeaSpine on July 1, 2015 and in accordance with the Employee Matters
Agreement,
the Company made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of share-based
compensation awards with the intention of preserving the intrinsic value of the awards prior to the separation.
Stock options issued in 2015 prior to the separation converted to those of the entity where the employee is
working post-separation. Stock options issued prior to 2015 converted to both Integra and SeaSpine options such
that the holders received stock options in both companies. The exercise price of these outstanding awards was
adjusted to preserve the value of the awards immediately prior to the separation. Performance stock, restricted
stock, and contract stock were adjusted for all employees holding outstanding awards to provide holders
performance stock, restricted stock, and contract stock in the company that employs such employee following the
separation. The adjustments to the Company’s stock-based compensation awards resulted in an increase in
incremental fair value of $4.4 million, of which $0.0 million, $0.3 million and $0.7 million was recorded during
the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Stock Options

The Company values stock option grants using the binomial distribution model. Management believes that
the binomial distribution model is preferable to the Black-Scholes model because it is a more flexible model that
gives consideration to the impact of non-transferability and vesting provisions in valuing employee stock options.

In determining the value of stock options granted, the Company considered that it has never paid cash
dividends and does not currently intend to pay cash dividends, and thus has assumed a 0% dividend yield.
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The expected life of
stock options is estimated based on historical data on exercise of stock options, post-vesting forfeitures and other
factors to estimate the expected term of the stock options granted. The risk-free interest rates are derived from the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant for instruments with a remaining term similar to the
expected life of the options. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 and elected to account for forfeitures as they
occur.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the calculation of fair value:

Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life of option from grant date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0%
28%
2.79%
8 years

0%
30%
2.18%
8 years

0%
29%
1.94%
8 years

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

F-41

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity.

Stock Options

Shares

(In thousands)

Weighted Average
Exercise Price

Weighted Average
Contractual Term
in Years

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(In thousands)

Outstanding at January 1, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited or Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,739
140
(426)
(5)

Outstanding at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .

1,448

Vested or expected to vest at December 31,

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exercisable at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .

1,448

1,117

$23.84
56.23
20.57
—

$27.91

$27.91

$22.47

3.79

3.79

3.01

$26,451

$26,451

$25,278

The intrinsic value of options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were
$16.9 million, $16.2 million and $9.7 million, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options
granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $21.78, $16.95 and $12.48, respectively.
Cash received from option exercises was $9.4 million, $9.8 million and $10.5 million, for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The realized tax benefit from options exercised were
$3.1 million, $6.2 million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018, there was approximately $4.1 million of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to unvested stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately two years.

Awards of Restricted Stock, Performance Stock and Contract Stock

The following table summarizes the Company’s awards of restricted stock, performance stock and contract

stock for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Restricted Stock Awards

Performance Stock
and Contract Stock
Awards

Shares

(In thousands)
451
261

—
(56)
(239)
—

417

Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share

$37.79
56.77

—
45.51
37.13
—

$48.97

Shares

(In thousands)
172
164

40
(14)
(203)
(74)

85

Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share

$33.61
56.23

21.42
—
55.81
42.94

$45.56

Unvested, January 1, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments for performance achievement

related to award target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancellations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Released . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested but not released . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unvested, December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Company recognized $18.1 million, $18.5 million and $15.6 million in expense related to such awards
during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The total fair market value of shares

F-42

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

vested and released in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $24.8 million, $22.2 million and $16.2 million, respectively.
Vested awards include shares that have been fully earned but had not been delivered as of December 31, 2018.

Performance stock awards have performance features associated with them. Performance stock, restricted
stock and contract stock awards generally have requisite service periods of three years. The fair value of these
awards is being expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

As of December 31, 2018, there was approximately $20.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to unvested restricted stock, performance stock and contract stock awards. These costs are expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years.

At December 31, 2018, there are approximately 0.5 million vested Restricted Units and 0.2 million vested
performance share units held by various employees for which the related shares have not yet been issued. The
final determination of the number of shares to be issued in respect of an award based on achievement of
pre-defined performance metrics is made by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

At December 31, 2018, there were approximately 3.0 million shares available for grant under the Plans.

The Company capitalized into inventory, share based compensation costs of $0.4 million, $0.5 million and
$0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Such share-based
compensation was recognized as cost of goods sold when related inventory was sold.

10. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS

As part of the acquisition of Codman Neurosurgery in 2017, the Company assumed various defined benefit
which covers certain employees acquired with Codman Neurosurgery in Austria, France, Japan, Germany and
Switzerland.

Net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans for the years ended

December 31, 2018 and 2017 included the following (amounts in thousands):

Year ended
December 31,

2018

2017

Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,704
351
(944)
8

$ 565
95
(224)
8

Net period benefit cost

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,119

$ 444

The following weighted average assumptions were used to develop net periodic pension benefit costs and
the actuarial present values of projected pension benefit obligations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-43

As of December 31,

2018

2017

1.00%
3.40%
1.70%

0.74%
3.08%
1.70%

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company’s discount rates are determined by considering current yield curves representing high quality,
long-term fixed income instruments. The resulting discount rates are consistent with the duration of plan
liabilities. In 2018 and 2017, the discount rates were prescribed as the current yield on corporate bonds with an
average rating of AA or AAA of equivalent currency and term to the liabilities. The expected returns on plan
assets represent the average rate of return expected to be earned on plan assets over the period the benefits
included in the benefit obligation are to be paid. In developing the expected rates of return, the Company
considers returns of historical market data as well as actual returns on the plan assets. Using this reference
information, the long-term return expectations for each asset category are developed according to the allocation
among those investment categories.

The assessment

is determined using projections from external financial sources,

long-term historical

averages, actual returns by asset class and the various asset class allocations by market.

The following sets forth the change in projected benefit obligations and the change in plan assets for the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and a reconciliation of the funded status at December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively (amounts in thousands):

Year ended
December 31,

2018

2017

Change In Projected Benefit Obligations

Projected benefit obligations, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premiums paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit payment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plans transferred in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$47,661
351
2,704
762
641
—
(1,483)
2,280
(374)

$

668
95
565
(12)
180
(89)
(19)
46,448
(175)

Projected benefit obligations, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$52,542

$47,661

Year ended
December 31,

2018

2017

Change In Plan Assets

Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premiums paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plans transferred in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$26,943
1,802
1,720
641
(1,463)
—
1,589
(129)

$ —
82
450
180
—
(89)
26,477
(157)

Plan assets at fair value, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$31,103

$26,943

F-44

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Year ended
December 31,

2018

2017

Reconciliation Of Funded Status

Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$31,103
52,542

$26,943
47,661

Unfunded benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$21,439

$20,718

The unfunded benefit obligations are included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at

December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had a $0.6 million and $0.4 million gain recognized
within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that has not been recognized as a component of net
periodic benefit cost. The combined accumulated benefit obligations for the defined benefit plans was
$49.6 million and $42.9 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Unrecognized gains and losses are amortized over the average remaining future service for each plan. For
plans with no active employees, they are amortized over the average life expectancy. The amortization of gains
and losses is determined by using a 10% corridor of the greater of the market value of assets or the accumulated
benefit obligation. Total unamortized gains and losses in excess of the corridor are amortized over the average
remaining future service.

Prior service costs/benefits for the pension plans are amortized over the average remaining future service of

plan participants at the time of the plan amendment.

The net plan assets of the pension plans are invested in common trusts. Common trusts are classified as
Level 2 in fair value hierarchy. The fair value of common trusts is valued at net asset value based on the fair
values of the underlying investments of the trusts as determined by the sponsor of the trusts. The investment
strategy of the Company’s defined benefit plans is both to meet the liabilities of the plans as they fall due and to
maximize the return on invested assets within appropriate risk profile.

The investment strategy for the Company’s defined benefit plans is both to meet the liabilities of the plans
as they fall due and to maximize the return on invested assets within appropriate risk tolerances. The benefit
plans in Austria, France and Germany had no assets at December 31, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, no plan assets are expected to be returned to the Company in the next

twelve months.

The following table is the summary of expected future benefit payments (in thousands):

2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Next five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,410
1,516
1,317
1,433
1,878
2,978

As of December 31, 2018, contributions expected to be paid to the plan in 2019 is $1.9 million.

F-45

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS

The Company also has various defined contribution savings plans that cover substantially all employees in
the United States, Belgium, Canada, France, Japan, Netherlands, the U.K. and Puerto Rico. The Company
matches a certain percentage of each employee’s contributions as per the provisions of the plans. Total
contributions by the Company to the plans were $8.1 million, $7.2 million and $5.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

11. LEASES AND RELATED PARTY LEASES

The Company leases administrative, manufacturing, research and distribution facilities and various
manufacturing, office and transportation equipment through operating lease agreements. Future minimum lease
payments under operating leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

Related
Parties

Third
Parties

Total

2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 296
296
296
296
296
1,724

(In thousands)
$ 16,472
13,510
12,197
12,937
10,707
100,675

$ 16,768
13,806
12,493
13,233
11,003
102,399

Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,204

$166,498

$169,702

Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and was $16.3 million,
$12.9 million and $10.3 million, respectively, and included $0.3 million, in related party rental expense in each
of the three years.

There were no future minimum lease payments under capital leases at December 31, 2018.

Related Party Leases

Until December 27, 2016, the Company leased certain production equipment from a corporation whose sole
stockholder was a general partnership, of which the Company’s principal owner and former Chairman and
director is a partner and the President. Under the terms of the lease agreement, the Company paid $0.1 million
per year to the related party lessor. Effective December 27, 2016, the Company purchased the production
equipment for $0.4 million.

The Company also leases its manufacturing facility in Plainsboro, New Jersey, from a general partnership
that is 50% owned by a corporation whose shareholders are trusts, whose beneficiaries include family members
of the Company’s principal owner and former Chairman and director. The term of the current lease agreement is
through October 31, 2032 at an annual rate of approximately $0.3 million per year. The current lease agreement
also provides (i) a 5 -year renewal option for the Company to extend the lease from November 1, 2032 through
October 31, 2037 at the fair market rental rate of the premises, and (ii) another 5 -year renewal option to extend
the lease from November 1, 2037 through October 31, 2042 at the fair market rental rate of the premises.

F-46

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

12. INCOME TAXES

Income (Loss) before income taxes consisted of the following:

United States operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(21,218)
78,621

(In thousands)
$(32,640)
44,025

$51,351
39,055

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 57,403

$ 11,385

$90,406

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

The 2017 Tax Act made significant changes to the previous tax law. Included among the numerous changes
were a reduction of the federal statutory rate from 35% to 21%, limitations on the deductibility of interest
expense and executive compensation, and the elimination of certain domestic tax deductions such as the domestic
production activities deduction. Additionally,
imposed a one-time repatriation tax on
accumulated foreign subsidiaries’ untaxed foreign earnings (the “Toll Tax”).

the 2017 Tax Act

The 2017 Tax Act implemented a territorial tax system and included base erosion provisions on non-U.S.
earnings, which subjects certain foreign earnings to additional taxation as global intangible low-taxed income
(“GILTI”). These provisions were effective on January 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had not
completed its full analysis related to the GILTI provisions. Upon further analysis of the 2017 Tax Act during
2018, the Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost in the year the tax is incurred.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when they are
realized or settled. During 2017, the Company recognized a provisional benefit of $43.4 million from the
remeasurement of the Company’s net deferred tax liabilities at the reduced rate of 21%. The Company has
finalized the remeasurement of its net deferred tax liabilities, as a result of the reduced rate, as of December 31,
2018.

The 2017 Tax Act eliminated the deferral of U.S. income tax on unrepatriated earnings from foreign
subsidiaries through the imposition of the Toll Tax, a one-time tax in 2017 on deemed repatriated foreign
earnings, which is paid over an eight-year period. The tax is assessed on the foreign subsidiary’s accumulated
foreign earnings that were not previously taxed. Foreign earnings in cash and cash equivalents are taxed at 15.5%
and all other earnings are taxed at 8.0%. The calculation of the Toll Tax allows for the ability to offset positive
foreign earnings with existing foreign deficits and use of foreign tax credits. The Company prepared a reasonable
estimate of the Toll tax as of December 31, 2017 amounting to an expense of $5.5 million, of which $0.4 million
was expected to be paid within one year. As the Company finalized its 2017 income tax returns during 2018, the
Company recorded a benefit of $1.0 million to reduce the provisional estimate to the final total Toll Tax of
$4.5 million.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has not provided deferred income taxes on unrepatriated earnings
from foreign subsidiaries as they are deemed to be indefinitely reinvested. Such taxes would primarily be
attributable to foreign withholding taxes and local income taxes when such earnings are distributed. As such, the
Company has determined the tax impact of repatriating these earnings would not be material as of December 31,
2018.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 to address the application of
U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or
analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects
of the 2017 Tax Act. The Company has made reasonable estimates of the impact of the 2017 Tax Act on its
consolidated financial statements and has recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated

F-47

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

earnings and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as its indefinite reinvestment assertion
and included these amounts in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The
Company applied the guidance of SAB No. 118 when accounting for the enactment date impact of the 2017 Tax
Act in 2017 throughout 2018. The Company finalized its calculations and completed its accounting for the
income tax effect of the 2017 Tax Act in December of 2018.

A reconciliation of the U.S. Federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

Federal statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Foreign operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charitable contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nondeductible meals and entertainment
Domestic production activities deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intercompany profit in inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nondeductible facilitative costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in valuation allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return to provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reduction of book gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax reform — Toll Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax reform — remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”)
Nondeductible executive compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Carryback of Federal net operating loss (“NOL”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

21.0% 35.0% 35.0%

(0.4)% (17.0)% (0.2)%
(21.8)% (112.7)% (10.0)%
(7.8)% (57.9)% (3.9)%
(1.2)% (10.6)% (0.4)%
8.8% 0.8%
1.6%
—%
—% (2.6)%
6.2% 11.6% 1.0%
—% 22.5% 0.2%
8.0% 0.4%
0.2%
0.4%
(4.6)% (0.3)%
(2.6)% (13.2)% (1.2)%
(2.9)% (4.3)% (1.5)%
—%
(4.6)% —%
—% 48.1% —%
—% (378.6)% —%
—% —%
3.5%
1.6%
—% —%
(3.7)% —% —%
0.8% 0.2%

—%

Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(5.9)% (468.7)% 17.5%

The effective tax rate increased by 462.8% in 2018 compared with 2017. The increase was primarily a result
of the $43.4 million benefit recorded during 2017 in relation to the reduction of the U.S. tax rate from 35% to
21%. Additional drivers of the higher 2018 tax rate include an expense of $2.0 million related to GILTI and an
expense of $0.9 million for nondeductible executive compensation, offset by a $2.1 million benefit from a
carryback of federal net operating loss from 2017 to 2015.

During 2018, the Company’s foreign operations generated a $3.1 million increase in income tax expense
when compared with 2017, because of the geographic and business mix of taxable earnings and losses, among
other factors. The 2018 foreign effective tax rate is 11.6%, a decrease of approximately 2.0% over the rate in
2017. The Company’s foreign tax rate is primarily based upon statutory rates.

The Company is negotiating a reduced corporate tax rate of 8% for the manufacturing operations in

Switzerland. Once finalized, the negotiated rate will be available through 2024.

F-48

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

During 2017, the Company’s foreign operations generated a $1.2 million increase in income tax expense
when compared with 2016, as a result of, among other factors, the geographic and business mix of taxable
earnings and losses. The 2017 foreign effective tax rate is 15.7%, a decrease of approximately 2.9% over the rate
in 2016. The Company’s foreign tax rate is primarily based upon statutory tax rates.

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Current:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(3,880)
1,609
7,057

$ 6,644
1,233
6,069

$13,700
2,503
6,113

Total current
Deferred:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,786

$ 13,946

$22,316

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(7,202)
(3,048)
2,066

(66,466)
(758)
(80)

(3,400)
(1,751)
(1,323)

Total deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(8,184)

$(67,304)

$ (6,474)

Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(3,398)

$(53,358)

$15,842

F-49

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The income tax effects of significant temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and

liabilities, shown before jurisdictional netting, are presented below:

December 31,

2018

2017

(In thousands)

Assets:

Doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory related items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued vacation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued bonus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized foreign exchange loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charitable contributions carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1,507
28,245
9,072
2,761
5,515
10,093
2,173
33,350
1,405
1,994
8,835

$

1,811
29,266
6,015
2,556
997
10,426
2,395
37,492
1,177
1,287
3,077

Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104,950
(6,973)

96,499
(7,961)

Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 97,977

$ 88,538

Liabilities:

Intangible and fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(144,861)
(4,089)

(146,327)
(1,091)

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(148,950)

$(147,418)

Total net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (50,973)

$ (58,880)

The deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on the enacted tax rates that apply in years in
which the temporary differences are expected to be realized or incurred. The Company remeasured its deferred
tax assets and liabilities as a result of the 2017 Tax Act, using a provisional estimate under SAB No. 118 during
2017. The primary impact of the re-measurement was a decrease in the net deferred tax liability for the reduction
of the U.S. statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%. There were no material changes to the provisional
amounts when the amounts were finalized in December of 2018.

At December 31, 2018, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $118.4 million for federal
income tax purposes, $34.5 million for foreign income tax purposes and $25.6 million for state income tax
purposes to offset future taxable income.

The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2035, $0.9 million of the foreign net operating
loss carryforwards expire through 2025 with the remaining $33.6 million having an indefinite carry forward
period. The state net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2037.

A valuation allowance of $7.0 million, $8.0 million and $3.6 million is recorded against the Company’s
gross deferred tax assets of $105.0 million, $96.5 million, and $78.2 million recorded at December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016, respectively.

The valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets for certain items that will be deductible for income tax
purposes under very limited circumstances and for which the Company believes it is not more likely than not that

F-50

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

it will realize the associated tax benefit. In the event that the Company determines that it would be able to realize
more or less than the recorded amount of net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance would be recorded in the period such a determination is made.

The Company’s valuation allowance decreased by $1.0 million, and increased by $4.4 million in 2018 and
2017, respectively. The 2018 overall decrease in the valuation allowance was primarily due to the realization of
certain deferred tax assets related to Derma Sciences and the impact of current year activity.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax benefits is as follows:

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases:

Current year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior years’ tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gross decreases:

Prior years’ tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Statute of limitations lapses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands)
$ 754

$1,085

$424

273
—

—
(21)
—

402
—

(777)
(17)
62

—
380

(546)
(131)
(34)

Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$676

$ 424

$ 754

Approximately $0.7 million of the balance at December 31, 2018 relates to uncertain tax positions that, if
recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate. There are no amounts within the balance of uncertain tax
positions at December 31, 2018 related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the amounts could
be reduced during the twelve months following December 31, 2018.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
The Company recognized a minimal benefit for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The
Company had minimal interest and penalties accrued for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016.

The Company files Federal income tax returns, as well as multiple state, local and foreign jurisdiction tax
returns. The Company is no longer subject to examinations of its U.S. consolidated Federal income tax returns by
the IRS through fiscal year 2014, however an examination of a pre-acquisition Federal tax return is ongoing for
one of the Company’s subsidiaries. All significant state and local matters have been concluded through fiscal
2012. All significant foreign matters have been settled through fiscal 2012.

F-51

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

13. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share was as follows:

Basic net income per share:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic net income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per share:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average common shares outstanding — Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of dilutive securities:

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands,
except per share amounts)

$60,801
82,857
0.73

$

$64,743
76,897
0.84

$

$74,564
74,386
1.00

$

$60,801
82,857

$64,743
76,897

$74,564
74,386

2016 Convertible notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
1,142

—
971
1,253

2,296
1,166
1,346

Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted net income per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83,999
0.72

$

79,121
0.82

$

79,194
0.94

$

Common stock of approximately 0.2 million shares at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 that are issuable
through exercise of dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share
because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

For the period from January 1, 2016 to December 15, 2016, the date of 2016 Convertible Notes settlement,
the potential excess conversion value on the 2016 Convertible Notes was included in the Company’s dilutive
share calculation because the average stock price for period outstanding exceeded the conversion price. On
December 15, 2016, the Company settled the 2016 Convertible Notes and issued 2.9 million shares of common
stock related to the conversion premium of 2016 Convertible Notes. The Company also exercised the call option
with hedge participants and received 2.9 million shares of common stock.

The Company also had warrants outstanding related to its 2016 Convertible Notes for the year ended 2016.
These warrants and the excess conversion value of the 2016 Convertible Notes are included in the diluted
earnings per share calculation using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of including such items would be
anti-dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the potential excess conversion value on the 2016 Notes
was included in the Company’s dilutive share calculation because the average stock price for the year ended
December 31, 2017 exceeded the conversion price.

Performance Shares and Restricted Units that entitle the holders to approximately 0.5 million shares of
common stock are included in the basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding calculation from their
date of issuance because no further consideration is due related to the issuance of the underlying common shares.

F-52

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

14. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component between December 31, 2018 and

2017 are presented in the table below, net of tax:

Balance at December 31, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net . . . . . . .
Less: Amounts reclassified from accumulated

other comprehensive income, net

. . . . . . . . . .
Less: Reclassification of stranded tax effect . . . .

Net current-period other comprehensive income
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(loss)

Balance at December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (4,813)

Gains and Losses
on Derivatives

Defined Benefit
Pension Items

Foreign Currency
Items

Total

(In thousands)

$ (2,979)
8,937

$ (93)
(643)

$(20,735)
(19,159)

$(23,807)
(10,865)

10,239
532

(1,834)

—
—

(643)

$(736)

—
—

10,239
532

(19,159)

(21,636)

$(39,894)

$(45,443)

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company reclassified gains of $7.8 million and $2.4 million

from AOCI to other income (expenses), net and interest income, respectively.

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In consideration for certain technology, manufacturing, distribution, and selling rights and licenses granted
to the Company, the Company has agreed to pay royalties on sales of certain products that it sells. The royalty
payments that the Company made under these agreements were not significant for any of the periods presented.

to various claims,

The Company is subject

lawsuits and proceedings in the ordinary course of the
Company’s business, including claims by current or former employees, distributors and competitors and with
respect to its products and product liability claims, lawsuits and proceedings, some of which have been settled by
the Company. In the opinion of management, such claims are either adequately covered by insurance or
otherwise indemnified, or are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material, adverse effect
on the Company’s financial condition. However, it is possible that the Company’s results of operations, financial
position and cash flows in a particular period could be materially affected by these contingencies.

TEI, acquired by Integra on July 17, 2015, manufactures a bovine-derived surgical mesh product for Boston
Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) and has been named as a defendant in lawsuits under a broad range of products
liability theories, many of which have not been served on TEI. As of January 14, 2019, only one active case
remained against TEI. Pursuant to an indemnification agreement with BSC (i) BSC is managing the litigation;
and (ii) TEI has in place a product liability insurance policy, of which it must exhaust $3.0 million before BSC’s
indemnity begins to cover relevant claims (and of which only a small portion has been utilized to date and
against which the insurer has reserved the entire $3.0 million ). In addition, Integra has certain protections in the
merger agreements with TEI which would indemnify it for approximately $30.0 million for the first fifteen
months after closing and between $20.0 and $30.0 million for the remainder of the three -year period after
closing for losses relating to a variety of matters, including half of certain products liability claims (including
those related to the product it manufactures for BSC) not covered by insurance. As of December 31, 2018, no
indemnification payments were received nor owed in relation to the lawsuits.

The Company accrues for loss contingencies when it is deemed probable that a loss has been incurred and
that loss is estimable. The amounts accrued are based on the full amount of the estimated loss before considering
insurance proceeds and do not include an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with the

F-53

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

loss contingency. The Company consistently accrues legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with loss
contingencies as those fees are incurred by outside counsel as a period cost.

Contingent Consideration

The Company determined the fair value of contingent consideration during the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 to reflect the change in estimate, additions, payments, transfers and the time value
of money during the period.

A reconciliation of the opening balances to the closing balances of these Level 3 measurements for the year

ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

Contingent Consideration
Liabilities Related to
Acquisition of Derma Sciences
(See Note 4)

Contingent Consideration
Liability Related to
Acquisition of Confluent
Surgical, Inc.

Short-term

Long-term

Short-term Long-term

Location in Financial
Statements

Balance as of January 1, 2017 . . . . . .
Additions from acquisition of Derma

—

—

Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33,707

3,467

—

—

22,036

—

Transfers from long-term to current

portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain)/Loss from change in fair value

of contingent consideration
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance as of December 31, 2017 . . .
Transfers from long-term to current

portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from change in fair value of

contingent consideration
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,193
(31,346)

(2,193)
—

22,184
—

(22,184)
—

(4,239)

113

294

148

Selling, general and
administrative

$

315

$ 1,387

$ 22,478

$

1,387
(2,000)

(1,387)

$
— $(24,000)

— $
$

—

—
—

—

—

Selling, general and
administrative

Balance as of December 31, 2018 . . .

$

298

—

230

$ 1,522

$

$

230

$

— $

On January 15, 2014, the Company acquired all outstanding shares of Confluent Surgical, Inc., (“Confluent
Surgical”). The purchase price includes contingent consideration. The potential maximum undiscounted
contingent consideration of $30.0 million consists of $25.0 million upon obtaining certain U.S. governmental
approvals and $5.0 million upon obtaining certain European governmental approvals, both related to the
completion of the transition of the Confluent Surgical business. The fair values of contingent consideration
related to the acquisition of Confluent Surgical were estimated using a discounted cash flow model using
discount rate of 2.2%. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company received the U.S. governmental approvals
and adjusted the related contingent consideration liability to $19.0 million, which the Company paid in April
2018. During the third quarter of 2018, the Company received certain European governmental approvals. The
Company paid the remaining $5.0 million of contingent consideration in October of 2018.

The Company assesses these assumptions on an ongoing basis as additional information affecting the
assumptions is obtained. The contingent consideration balances included in the table above were included in

F-54

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

other liabilities at December 31, 2018 and accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other liabilities at
December 31, 2017, respectively.

Supply Agreement Liability and Above Market Supply Agreement Liability

On January 15, 2014, the Company entered into a transitional supply agreement with Covidien Group S.a.r.l
(“Covidien”). This agreement contains financial incentives to Covidien for the timely supply of products each
fiscal quarter through the third anniversary of the agreement. The prices paid under the supply agreement are
essentially flat through the third anniversary of the agreement, and then increase significantly in each of the
following three years.

The Company determined the fair value of its supply agreement

liability and above market supply
agreement liability with Covidien for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 to reflect the payments,
change in estimate and the time value of money during the period.

A reconciliation of the opening balances to the closing balances of these Level 3 measurements is as follows

(in thousands):

Supply Agreement Liability

Above Market Supply
Agreement Liability

Location in Statement of
Operations

Short-term

Long-term Short-term Long-term

Balance as of January 1, 2017 . . . . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain)/loss from change in fair value . . .

Balance as of December 31, 2017 . . . . .
Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain)/loss from change in fair value . . .

Transfer to accounts payable . . . . . . . . .

Balance as of December 31, 2018 . . . . .

166
(166)
—
—

$ —
$ —
$ —

$ —

$ —

—
—
—
—

$—
$—
$—

$—

$—

—
(113)
3,273
(519)

2,648
(415)
(3,273)
1,040

Selling, general and
administrative

$ 2,641
$(1,817)
$ (470)

$ —
$ —
$ — Selling, general and

administrative

$ (159)

$ —

$

195

$ —

The fair values of supply agreement liability and above market supply agreement liability were estimated
using a discounted cash flow model using discount rate of 12.0%. The Company assesses the assumptions on an
ongoing basis as additional information impacting assumptions is obtained. The above market supply agreement
liability — short-term was included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during 2018 or 2017. If the Company’s estimates regarding
the fair value of its contingent consideration, supply agreement liability and above market supply agreement
liability are inaccurate, a future adjustment to these estimated fair values may be required which could change
significantly.

BioD

On April 7, 2017, the Company’s indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, BioD filed an action in the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County seeking a declaration that the resignation of Russell
Olsen, the former CEO of BioD, was “for Good Reason” (as defined in Olsen’s employment agreement); a

F-55

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

finding that Olsen breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, committed legal fraud, equitable
fraud and negligent misrepresentation; and an award of damages for such actions, including a return of severance
fees paid to Olsen. BioD was acquired in August 2016 by Derma Sciences, which Integra subsequently acquired
in February 2017. After receiving a job offer from Integra that Olsen believed materially diminished his title and
authority, on February 24, 2017 Olsen indicated his intention to terminate his position with BioD for Good
Reason, as otherwise permitted by his employment agreement with BioD. Shortly thereafter, Cynthia Weatherly
(as representative of the former equity owners of BioD) claimed in a letter to Derma Sciences that Olsen’s
resignation was a “termination Without Cause” (as also defined in Olsen’s employment agreement), which would
arguably trigger an acceleration of the earn out under a merger agreement between Derma Sciences, BioD and
other parties (the “BioD Merger Agreement”), which was entered into in July 2016, and require as a result of the
acceleration the payment of $26.5 million by BioD. As previously disclosed and described in Note 4 —
Acquisitions and Pro Forma Results, Integra assumed this contingent liability in connection with its acquisition
of Derma Sciences. The action for a declaratory judgment was filed to clarify that Olsen’s termination was for
Good Reason and not Without Cause. If the employment agreement was terminated for Good Reason, then the
Company believes that the earn out provision under the BioD Merger Agreement should not be accelerated and
the likelihood of loss is remote.

16. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

In October 2017, the Company leveraged the globally recognized Codman name by rebranding the Specialty

Surgical Solutions segment as Codman Specialty Surgical.

The Company internally manages two global reportable segments and reports the results of its businesses to

its chief operating decision maker. The two reportable segments and their activities are described below.

• The Codman Specialty Surgical segment includes (i) the Neurosurgery business, which sells a full line
of products for neurosurgery and neuro critical care such as tissue ablation equipment, dural repair
products, cerebral spinal fluid management devices, intracranial monitoring equipment, and cranial
stabilization equipment and (ii) the precision tools and instruments business, which sells more than
60,000 instrument patterns and surgical and lighting products to hospitals, surgery centers, dental,
podiatry, and veterinary offices.

• The Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies segment includes such offerings as skin and wound repair,
bone and joint fixation implants in the upper and lower extremities, bone grafts, and nerve and tendon
repair products.

The Corporate and other category includes (i) various executive, finance, human resource, information

systems and legal functions, (ii) brand management, and (iii) share-based compensation costs.

The operating results of the various reportable segments as presented are not comparable to one another
because (i) certain operating segments are more dependent than others on corporate functions for unallocated
general and administrative and/or operational manufacturing functions, and (ii) the Company does not allocate

F-56

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

certain manufacturing costs and general and administrative costs to the operating segment results. Net sales and
profit by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Segment Net Sales

Codman Specialty Surgical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 963,929
508,512

$ 720,301
467,935

$ 632,524
359,551

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,472,441

$1,188,236

$ 992,075

Segment Profit

Codman Specialty Surgical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Orthopedics and Tissue Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 363,336
149,510

$ 292,971
129,697

$ 256,629
103,852

Segment profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

512,846
(21,160)
(380,688)

422,668
(20,370)
(357,494)

360,481
(13,862)
(231,279)

Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 110,998

$

44,804

$ 115,340

The Company does not allocate any assets to the reportable segments. No asset information is reported to

the chief operating decision maker and disclosed in the financial information for each segment.

The Company attributes revenue to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. Total revenue,

net and long-lived assets (tangible) by major geographic area are summarized below:

United
States*

Europe

Asia Pacific

Rest of the World

Consolidated

(In thousands)

Total revenue, net:

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,045,887
894,260
765,608

$201,354
150,147
120,588

$144,253
80,636
59,985

Total long-lived assets:

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 280,382
247,154

$ 32,679
30,942

$

3,765
4,189

$80,947
63,193
45,894

$ 3,203
3,044

$1,472,441
1,188,236
992,075

$ 320,029
285,329

*

Includes long-lived assets in Puerto Rico.

F-57

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

17. SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION — UNAUDITED

Quarter

2018
First . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2017
First . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total
revenue,
net

Gross
margin

Net
income

Per
Share -
Basic (1)

Per
Share -
Diluted (1)

(In thousands, except per share data)

357,082
366,190
365,854
383,315

212,860
228,625
222,609
236,851

10,992
11,376
13,295
25,138

$0.14
0.14
0.16
0.29

1,472,441

900,945

60,801

$ 258,636
282,164
278,834
368,602

$172,051
183,166
177,077
220,431

$ 6,394
10,835
3,159
44,355

$0.09
0.14
0.04
0.57

$1,188,236

$752,725

$64,743

$0.14
0.14
0.15
0.29

$0.08
0.14
0.04
0.56

(1) Per common share amounts for the quarters and full years have been calculated separately. Accordingly,
quarterly amounts do not necessarily add to the annual amount because of differences in the weighted
average common shares outstanding during each period principally due to the effect of the Company’s
issuing shares of its common stock during the year.

(2) The net income for the fourth quarter of 2017 includes benefit from income taxes of $43.4 million related to
the re-measurement of our deferred taxes resulting from a reduction of the federal statutory rate from 35%
to 21% from the 2017 Tax Act (see Note 12, Income Taxes ).

F-58

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Description

Year ended December 31, 2018

Balance at
Beginning
of Period

Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

Other

Deductions

(In thousands)

Balance at
End of
Period

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance . . . . . . . . .

$8,882
7,961

$

557
(894)

Year ended December 31, 2017

Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns

$(4,649) (3) $(1,071) (2) $3,719
6,973

(94)

—

and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance . . . . . . . . .

$6,319
3,604

$ 4,920
740

$1,518 (1)
3,617 (1)

$(3,875) (2) $8,882
7,961

—

Year ended December 31, 2016:

Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns

and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance . . . . . . . . .

$5,572
4,887

$ 2,009
(1,228)

$ —
—

$(1,262) (2) $6,319
3,604

(55)

(1) The above amounts primarily relate to amounts acquired through acquisition of Derma Sciences and effect

of foreign currency translations.

(2) Deductions primarily relates to allowance for doubtful accounts written off during the year, net of recoveries

and other adjustments.

(3) The Company transferred sales returns and allowances from accounts receivable, net to accrued expenses
and other current liabilities upon adopting Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective
method.

F-59

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Enhancing the quality 
of lives is not only our 
business, but it is also 
our responsibility 

For 30 years, Integra has made life-saving and life-
enhancing products that have helped millions  
of people around the world. Our 4,500 colleagues have 
contributed to improving our environment, maintaining 
the health and safety of our colleagues, promoting 
diversity and inclusion in our culture, giving back to 
our communities, and complying with regulatory and 
government standards. We abide by a strong ethical 
code of conduct that guides our business and inspires 
us to do well by doing good for our shareholders, our 
colleagues, our customers, and our patients every day.

Judith E. O’Grady,
R.N., M.S.N., R.A.C.
Corporate Vice President, 
Global Regulatory Affairs

One of the first Integra colleagues

CUTTING BACK ON
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION

LEED CERTIFICATION

As we stand up new facilities and renovate current facilities, we aim to achieve 
LEED-certified facilities throughout the United States. LEED is a top rating 
system that analyzes green building design and construction to ensure that 
buildings have a positive impact on people and the planet. Our soon-to-be 
worldwide headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey, is a LEED-certified building.

Integra LifeSciences has committed 
to installing energy-efficient 
lighting and using light motion 
sensors to help conserve energy 
in its global facilities. Many of 
our newer Integra facilities in 
the United States, Europe, Asia, 
Middle East and Africa have already 
adopted this practice and begun 
minimizing their environmental 
impact on energy consumption.

REDUCING GREENHOUSE
GAS EMISSIONS

As stewards of the environment in 
which we live and work, Integra is 
doing its part to reduce greenhouse 
gas emissions from its more than 30 
locations around the world to help 
decrease pollution, improve global 
water supply, and slow down the 
effects of climate change.

“We know our 
environmental 
impact and 
responsibility does 
not end once our 
products leave the 
plant. We believe we 
have an important 
role to play to make 
the world a greener, 
safer and healthier 
place to live.” 

Pierre De Taillandier
Plant Manager

GIVING BACK TO THE COMMUNITY

Integra has a long tradition of 
giving back to society. The company 
contributes to causes, including 
breast cancer, diabetes, brain 
tumors, burns, and many more. Over 
the last five years, Integra donated 
products valued at approximately 
$135 million to surgical missions and 
educational efforts. For example, 
in collaboration with Orphan Grain 
Train, Integra has been donating 
shunts to benefit babies and young 
children in Kyrgyzstan over the past 
few years.

~$135 million
in product 
donations in 
the last 5 years

$10 million 
in foundation 
grants

THE INTEGRA FOUNDATION

The Integra Foundation is 
committed to improving people’s 
lives through medical research 
and education. The Foundation 
focuses on sponsorship in 
regenerative medicine, plastic 
surgery, neurosurgery and 
extremity orthopedics. It also 
considers grants to organizations 
that support people affected by 
diseases and conditions within its 
areas of focus, and organizations 
that enhance the health and 
well-being of communities. 
Since its inception, the Integra 
Foundation has awarded grants 
amounting to $10 million. The 
Integra Foundation is a separate 
legal entity, exclusively dedicated 
to charitable, educational, and 
scientific purposes.

PARTNERING TO HELP PATIENTS

Our work with patients extends 
beyond the walls of the operating 
room. We’re very proud of the long-
standing relationships with the 
Children’s Brain Tumor Foundation, 
the Wounded Warriors Project, and 
the Phoenix Burn Society, among 
others, to continue to help make a 
difference in patients’ lives.

“We are proud to 
work alongside 
organizations that 
allow us to continue 
to make a difference 
in people’s lives.” 

Tom Tarca
VP Professional Education
Regenerative Products

“It is a tremendous 
feeling when your 
colleagues recognize 
and engage in 
your culture.” 

Tyhesha Cromwell
Chair, IAAAG

THE WOMEN OF INTEGRA NETWORK (WIN)

Last year, the Women’s Leadership Council, an action-oriented advisory group
to the CEO, was formed to focus on understanding the current environment
for the women of Integra and determine the areas of opportunity the company
should address. One of the key areas of focus was the development of women’s
networks that would help connect colleagues across Integra and coordinate
activities to support the advancement of women. To date, there are more than
15 Women of Integra Network (WIN) chapters across the company. For the
second year in a row, Integra celebrated International Women’s Day across the
company, which was actively supported by the WIN chapters.

INTEGRA AFRICAN AMERICAN
AFFINITY GROUP

The Integra African American Affinity 
Group (IAAAG) is a forum for our 
African American colleagues to 
focus on professional development, 
sharing of best practices, fostering 
an environment of inclusion and 
collaboration across our sites, raising 
awareness of the many contributions 
of our African American members, 
and striving to be role models for all 
employees of Integra.

COMPLIANCE

Integra is a company that values 
integrity, and we are committed to 
our Code of Conduct, which was 
drafted in consideration of laws, 
regulations, and codes of ethics 
relevant to our industry around 
the world. To hold our company 
accountable as a leader in medical 
technology, Integra operates 
a comprehensive compliance 
program, which serves to help 
prevent and detect potential 
violations of laws, regulations and 
industry codes of ethics applicable 
to a publicly traded and global 
medical technology company.

“As a company, we believe
that our responsibility
extends beyond the walls
of the operating room. We
are driven to do well by doing
good for each other and the
communities we serve.”

Peter J. Arduini
 President and CEO
 Integra LifeSciences

Doing Well By Doing Good