SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from __________ to __________.
Commission File Number 1-37836-1
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Marshall Islands
98-0467117
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
600 Third Avenue, 39th Floor, New York, New York
10016
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212-578-1600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Ticker Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock (no par value)
INSW
New York Stock Exchange
Rights to Purchase Common Stock
N/A
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or emerging growth
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒
Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the
correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the
registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 28, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed
second quarter, was $2.9 billion, based on the closing price of $59.13 per share of common stock on the NYSE on that date. For this purpose, all outstanding shares of
common stock have been considered held by non-affiliates, other than the shares beneficially owned by directors and officers of the registrant; certain of such persons
disclaim that they are affiliates of the registrant.
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, as of February 24, 2025: common stock, no par value, 49,194,458 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed by the registrant in connection with its 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference
in Part III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Available Information
i
Forward-Looking Statements
i
Supplementary Financial Information
iii
Glossary
iii
PART I
Item 1.
Business
1
Our Business
1
2024 in Review
1
Our Strategy
2
Fleet Operations
5
Human Capital Management and Employees
9
Competition
11
Environmental and Security Matters Relating to Bulk Shipping
11
Inspection by Classification Societies
20
Insurance
21
Income Taxation of the Company
21
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
22
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
44
Item 1C.
Cybersecurity
44
Item 2.
Properties
47
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
47
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
47
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
48
Item 6.
Reserved
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
51
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
67
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
68
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
118
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
118
Item 9B.
Other Information
119
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
119
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
121
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
121
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
121
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
121
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
122
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
128
Signatures
129
i
References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the “Company”, “INSW”, “we”, “us”, or “our” refer to International Seaways, Inc.
and, unless the context otherwise requires or otherwise is expressly stated, its subsidiaries.
A glossary of shipping terms (the “Glossary”) that should be used as a reference when reading this Annual Report on Form 10-K can
be found immediately prior to Part I. Capitalized terms that are used in this Annual Report are either defined when they are first used
or in the Glossary.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company makes available free of charge through its internet website www.intlseas.com, its Annual Report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company
electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our website and the
information contained on that site, or connected to that site, are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The public may also read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 (information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330). The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at https://www.sec.gov.
The Company also makes available on its website, its corporate governance guidelines, its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,
insider trading policy, anti-bribery and corruption policy, incentive compensation recoupment policy, and charters of the Audit
Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Risk Assessment Committee of the
Board of Directors. The Company is required to disclose any amendment to a provision of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
The Company intends to use its website as a method of disseminating this disclosure, as permitted by applicable SEC rules. Any such
disclosure will be posted to the Company website within four business days following the date of any such amendment. Neither our
website nor the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. In addition, we may make or approve certain statements in
future filings with the SEC, in press releases, or oral or written presentations by representatives of the Company. All statements other
than statements of historical facts should be considered forward-looking statements. Words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “would”,
“could”, “appears”, “believe”, “intends”, “expects”, “estimates”, “targeted”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “goal”, and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements but should not be considered as the only means through which these statements may
be made. Such forward-looking statements represent the Company’s reasonable expectation with respect to future events or
circumstances based on various factors and are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to the Company’s
operations, financial results, financial condition, business, prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. Accordingly, there are or will be
important factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in these statements. Undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements and
consideration should be given to the following factors when reviewing any such statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
the highly cyclical nature of INSW’s industry;
fluctuations in the market value of vessels;
declines in charter rates, including spot charter rates or other market deterioration;
an increase in the supply of vessels without a commensurate increase in demand;
the impact of adverse weather and natural disasters;
the adequacy of INSW’s insurance to cover its losses, including in connection with maritime accidents or spill events;
constraints on capital availability;
changing economic, political and governmental conditions in the United States and/or abroad and general conditions in the
oil and natural gas industry;
the impact of changes in fuel prices;
ii
acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels;
terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability, including attacks against merchant vessels in the Red Sea and the
Gulf of Aden by Iran-backed Houthi militants based in Yemen;
the war between Russia and Ukraine could adversely affect INSW’s business;
the impact of public health threats and outbreaks of other highly communicable diseases;
the effect of the Company’s indebtedness on its ability to finance operations, pursue desirable business opportunities and
successfully run its business in the future;
an event occurs that causes the rights issued under the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement adopted by the Company on
April 11, 2023 to become exercisable;
the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash to service its indebtedness and to comply with debt covenants;
the Company’s ability to make capital expenditures to expand the number of vessels in its fleet, and to maintain all of its
vessels and to comply with existing and new regulatory standards;
the availability and cost of third-party service providers for technical and commercial management of the Company’s fleet;
the Company’s ability to renew its time charters when they expire or to enter into new time charters;
termination or change in the nature of the Company’s relationship with any of the commercial pools in which it participates
and the ability of such commercial pools to pursue a profitable chartering strategy;
competition within the Company’s industry and INSW’s ability to compete effectively for charters with companies with
greater resources;
the loss of a large customer or significant business relationship;
the Company’s ability to realize benefits from its past acquisitions or acquisitions or other strategic transactions it may make
in the future;
increasing operating costs and capital expenses as the Company’s vessels age, including increases due to limited shipbuilder
warranties or the consolidation of suppliers;
the Company’s ability to replace its operating leases on favorable terms, or at all;
changes in credit risk with respect to the Company’s counterparties on contracts;
the failure of contract counterparties to meet their obligations;
the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees;
work stoppages or other labor disruptions by employees of INSW or other companies in related industries;
unexpected drydock costs;
the potential for technological innovation to reduce the value of the Company’s vessels and charter income derived
therefrom;
the impact of an interruption in or failure of the Company’s information technology and communication systems upon the
Company’s ability to operate;
seasonal variations in INSW’s revenues;
government requisition of the Company’s vessels during a period of war or emergency;
the Company’s compliance with complex laws, regulations and in particular, environmental laws and regulations, including
those relating to ballast water treatment and the emission of greenhouse gases and air contaminants, including from marine
engines;
legal, regulatory or market measures to address climate change, including proposals to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases
(“GHGs”) and other sustainability initiatives, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business and results of
operations;
increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders, and other market participants with respect to our
sustainability and governance policies;
any non-compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 or other applicable regulations relating to bribery or
corruption;
the impact of litigation, government inquiries and investigations;
governmental claims against the Company;
the arrest of INSW’s vessels by maritime claimants;
changes in laws, including governing tax laws, treaties or regulations, including those relating to environmental and security
matters;
changes in worldwide trading conditions, including the impact of tariffs, trade sanctions, boycotts and other restrictions on
trade; and
pending and future tax law changes may result in significant additional taxes to INSW.
iii
Investors should carefully consider these risk factors and the additional risk factors outlined in more detail in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K and in other reports hereafter filed by the Company with the SEC under the caption “Risk Factors.” The Company assumes
no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
and written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or its representatives after the date of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statement contained in this paragraph and in other reports hereafter filed
by the Company with the SEC.
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Company reports its financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America
(“GAAP”). However, the Company has included certain non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, which it believes provide useful
information to both management and readers of this report in measuring the financial performance and financial condition of the
Company. These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and, therefore, may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, nor should they be construed as an alternative to other titled
measures determined in accordance with GAAP.
The Company presents three non-GAAP financial measures: time charter equivalent revenues, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Time
charter equivalent revenues represent shipping revenues less voyage expenses, as a measure to compare revenue generated from a
voyage charter to revenue generated from a time charter. EBITDA represents net income/(loss) before interest expense and income
taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. Adjusted EBITDA consists of EBITDA adjusted for the impact of certain items that
we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes industry data and forecasts that we have prepared based, in part, on information obtained
from industry publications and surveys. Third-party industry publications, surveys and forecasts generally state that the information
contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. In addition, certain statements regarding our market position
in this report are based on information derived from the Company’s market studies and research reports. Unless we state otherwise,
statements about the Company’s relative competitive position in this report are based on our management’s beliefs, internal studies
and management’s knowledge of industry trends.
GLOSSARY
Unless otherwise noted or indicated by the context, the following terms used in the Annual Report on Form 10-K have the following
meanings:
Aframax—A medium size crude oil tanker of approximately 80,000 to 120,000 deadweight tons. Aframaxes can generally transport
from 500,000 to 800,000 barrels of crude oil and are also used in Lightering. A coated Aframax operating in the refined petroleum
products trades may be referred to as an LR2.
Ballast — Any heavy material, including water, carried temporarily or permanently in a vessel to provide desired draft and stability.
Bareboat charter—A charter under which a customer pays a fixed daily or monthly rate for a fixed period of time for use of the vessel.
The customer pays all costs of operating the vessel, including voyage and vessel expenses. Bareboat charters are usually long term.
b/d—Barrels per day.
Charter—Contract entered into with a customer for the use of the vessel for a specific voyage at a specific rate per unit of cargo
(“voyage charter”), or for a specific period of time at a specific rate per unit (day or month) of time (“time charter”).
Classification Societies—Organizations that establish and administer standards for the design, construction and operational
maintenance of vessels. As a practical matter, vessels cannot trade unless they meet these standards.
Commercial management or commercially managed—The management of the employment, or chartering, of a vessel and associated
functions, including seeking and negotiating employment for vessels, billing and collecting revenues, issuing voyage instructions,
purchasing fuel, and appointing port agents.
Commercial management agreements or CMA — A contract under which the commercial management of a vessel is outsourced to a
third-party service provider.
iv
Commercial pool—A commercial pool is a group of similar size and quality vessels with different shipowners that are placed under
one administrator or manager. Pools allow for scheduling and other operating efficiencies such as multi-legged charters and contracts
of affreightment and other operating efficiencies.
Consolidated Net Debt to Book Capital— Consolidated debt, net of unamortized discounts and deferred finance costs and the sum of
consolidated cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and non-current restricted cash divided by total equity.
Consolidated Net Debt to Assets Value—Consolidated debt, net of unamortized discounts and deferred finance costs and the sum of
consolidated cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and non-current restricted cash, divided by the fair value of the
Company’s owned fleet of vessels.
Contract of affreightment or COA—An agreement providing for the transportation between specified points for a specific quantity of
cargo over a specific time period but without designating specific vessels or voyage schedules, thereby allowing flexibility in
scheduling since no vessel designation is required. COAs can either have a fixed rate or a market-related rate. One example would be
two shipments of 70,000 tons per month for two years at the prevailing spot rate at the time of each loading.
Crude oil—Oil in its natural state that has not been refined or altered.
Deadweight tons or dwt—The unit of measurement used to represent cargo carrying capacity of a vessel, but including the weight of
consumables such as fuel, lube oil, drinking water and stores.
Demurrage—Additional revenue paid to the shipowner on its voyage charters for delays experienced in loading and/or unloading
cargo that are not deemed to be the responsibility of the shipowner, calculated in accordance with specific Charter terms.
Drydocking—An out-of-service period during which planned repairs and maintenance are carried out, including all underwater
maintenance such as external hull painting. During the drydocking, certain mandatory Classification Society inspections are carried
out and relevant certifications issued. Normally, as the age of a vessel increases, the cost and frequency of drydockings increase.
Emission Control Area—A sea area in which stricter controls are established to minimize airborne emissions from ships as defined by
Annex VI of the 1997 MARPOL Protocol.
EU – the European Union.
Exclusive Economic Zone—An area that extends up to 200 nautical miles beyond the territorial sea of a state’s coastline (land at
lowest tide) over which the state has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving and managing natural
resources.
Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (“scrubber”)—Shipboard equipment intended to reduce sulfur air emissions to within regulatory limits.
Floating Storage Offloading Unit or FSO—A converted or new build barge or tanker, moored at a location to receive crude or other
products for storage and transfer purposes. FSOs are not equipped with petroleum processing facilities.
Handysize— Smaller product carrier of approximately 25,000 to 42,000 deadweight tons, generally operate on medium-range or
shorter routes.
International Energy Agency or IEA — An intergovernmental organization established in the framework of the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development in 1974. Among other things, the IEA provides research, statistics, analysis and
recommendations relating to energy.
International Maritime Organization or IMO—An agency of the U.N., which is the body that is responsible for the administration of
internationally developed maritime safety and pollution treaties, including MARPOL.
International Flag—International law requires that every merchant vessel be registered in a country. International Flag vessel refers to
those vessels that are registered under a flag other than that of the United States.
LIBOR—the London Interbank Offered Rate.
v
Lightering—The process of off-loading crude oil or petroleum products from large size tankers, typically VLCCs, into smaller tankers
and/or barges for discharge in ports from which the larger tankers are restricted due to the depth of the water, narrow entrances or
small berths.
LR1—A coated Panamax tanker. LR is an abbreviation of Long Range.
LR2—A coated Aframax tanker.
MARPOL—International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating
thereto. This convention includes regulations aimed at preventing and minimizing pollution from ships by accident and by routine
operations.
Merger – the merger on July 16, 2021 of Dispatch Transaction Sub. Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation, with and into Diamond S
Shipping Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation, with Diamond S Shipping Inc. surviving such merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
INSW pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 30, 2021 by and among INSW, Diamond S and Dispatch
Transaction Sub, Inc.
MR—An abbreviation for Medium Range. Certain types of vessels, such as a Product Carrier of approximately 42,000 to 60,000
deadweight tons, generally operate on medium-range routes.
OECD—Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is a group of developed countries in North America, Europe and
Asia.
OPEC—Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which is an international organization established to coordinate and unify the
petroleum policies of its members.
P&I insurance or P&I—Protection and indemnity insurance, commonly known as P&I insurance, is a form of marine insurance
provided by a P&I club. A P&I club is a mutual (i.e., a co-operative) insurance association that provides cover for its members, who
will typically be shipowners, ship-operators or demise charterers.
Panamax—A medium size vessel of approximately 53,000 to 80,000 deadweight tons. A coated Panamax operating in the refined
petroleum products trades may be referred to as an LR1.
Product Carrier—General term that applies to any tanker that is used to transport refined oil products, such as gasoline, jet fuel or
heating oil.
Safety Management System or SMS—A framework of processes and procedures that addresses a spectrum of operational risks
associated with quality, environment, health and safety. The SMS is certified by ISM (International Safety Management Code), ISO
9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management).
Scrubber—See Exhaust Gas Cleaning System.
SOFR—Secured Overnight Financing Rate.
Special Survey—An extensive inspection of a vessel by Classification Society surveyors that must be completed once every five-year
period. Special surveys require a vessel to be drydocked.
Suezmax—A large crude oil tanker of approximately 120,000 to 200,000 deadweight tons. Suezmaxes can generally transport about
one million barrels of crude oil.
Technical Management or technically managed—The management of the operation of a vessel, including physically maintaining the
vessel, maintaining necessary certifications, and supplying necessary stores, spares, and lubricating oils. Responsibilities also
generally include selecting, engaging and training crew, and arranging necessary insurance coverage.
Time Charter—A Charter under which a customer pays a fixed daily or monthly rate for a fixed period of time for use of the vessel.
Subject to any restrictions in the Charter, the customer decides the type and quantity of cargo to be carried and the ports of loading and
unloading. The customer pays all voyage expenses such as fuel, canal tolls, and port charges. The shipowner pays all vessel expenses
such as the technical management expenses.
vi
Time Charter Equivalent or TCE—TCE is the abbreviation for time charter equivalent. TCE revenues, which is voyage revenues less
voyage expenses, serves as an industry standard for measuring and managing fleet revenue and comparing results between
geographical regions and among competitors.
Ton-mile demand—A calculation that multiplies the average distance of each route a tanker travels by the volume of cargo moved.
The greater the increase in long haul movement compared with shorter haul movements, the higher the increase in ton-mile demand.
U.N. – the United Nations
U.S. Coast Guard or USCG—The United States Coast Guard.
Vessel expenses—Includes crew costs, vessel stores and supplies, lubricating oils, maintenance and repairs, insurance and
communication costs associated with the operations of vessels.
Vessel Recycling—The complete or partial dismantling of a ship at a recycling facility to recover components and materials for
reprocessing and reuse, including management and care of hazardous and other similar materials.
VLCC—VLCC is the abbreviation for Very Large Crude Carrier, a large crude oil tanker of approximately 200,000 to 320,000
deadweight tons. VLCCs can generally transport two million barrels or more of crude oil. These vessels are mainly used on the
longest (long haul) routes from the Arabian Gulf to North America, Europe, and Asia, from West Africa to the United States and
Asian destinations and from the Americas to Asian destinations.
Voyage Charter—A charter under which a customer pays a transportation charge for the movement of a specific cargo between two or
more specified ports. The shipowner pays all Voyage Expenses, and all Vessel Expenses unless the vessel to which the Charter relates
has been time chartered-in. The customer is liable for Demurrage, if incurred.
Voyage Expenses—Includes fuel, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling operations and brokerage commissions paid by the
Company under voyage charters. These expenses are subtracted from shipping revenues to calculate TCE revenues for voyage
charters.
1
International Seaways, Inc.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OUR BUSINESS
International Seaways, Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation incorporated in 1999, and its wholly owned subsidiaries own and operate a
fleet of oceangoing vessels engaged primarily in the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the International Flag trade.
Our vessel operations are organized into two segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. At December 31, 2024, we owned or
operated an International Flag fleet of 78 vessels (totaling an aggregate of 9.1 million dwt), consisting of VLCC, Suezmax and
Aframax crude tankers, as well as LR2, LR1 and MR product carriers. In addition to our operating fleet of 78 vessels, six dual-fuel
ready LR1 newbuilds are contracted for delivery to the Company between the second half of 2025 and third quarter of 2026, bringing
the total operating and newbuild fleet to 84 vessels. The Marshall Islands is the principal flag of registry of our vessels. Additional
information about our fleet, including its ownership profile, is set forth under “— Fleet Operations — Fleet Summary,” as well as on
the Company’s website, www.intlseas.com. Neither our website nor the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our ultimate customers, including those of the commercial pools in which we participate, include major independent and state-owned
oil companies, oil traders, refinery operators and international government entities. We generally charter our vessels to customers
either for specific voyages at spot rates through the services of pools in which the Company participates, or for specific periods of
time at fixed daily rates through time charters or bareboat charters. Spot market rates are highly volatile, while time charter and
bareboat charter rates provide more predictable streams of TCE revenues because they are fixed for specific periods of time. For a
more detailed discussion on factors influencing spot and time charter markets, see “— Fleet Operations — Commercial Management”
below.
2024 IN REVIEW
In 2024, we recorded our second best annual financial results since becoming an independent public company in 2016, as the 2024
results trailed only the very strong results achieved during 2023. Shipping revenues and TCE Revenues for 2024 were $1.0 billion and
$0.9 billion, respectively. Approximately 53% of our TCE Revenues were generated from our Product Carriers segment and 47%
from our Crude Tankers segment. Income from vessel operations decreased by $160.2 million to $455.2. million in 2024, from $615.4
million in 2023, primarily driven by lower average daily rates across most of INSW’s fleet sectors. We achieved an Adjusted EBITDA
(see Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for definition) of $583.3
million in 2024 compared to $723.8 million in 2023.
In addition, we continued to further enhance our strong balance sheet by increasing total liquidity to $632.2 million from $601.2
million at the end of 2023, and ended the year with 45% (i.e., 35 vessels) of our fleet unencumbered, a net loan to value ratio of
15.5%, and a net debt-to-capital ratio of 22.2%. We made approximately $338.8 million in capital investments for vessel and other
property purchases, vessel improvements, vessel construction and drydocking. We also returned capital to our shareholders through
cash dividends totaling $284.4 million and $25.0 million in repurchases of our common stock.
During 2024, we continued to focus on (i) maximizing our fleet’s earning potential through safe and reliable operations, opportunistic
charter-ins/charter-outs, and sales and purchases of vessels, (ii) building on our track record as a disciplined capital allocator, and (iii)
executing transactions that would ultimately unlock the value of our shares to investors.
We executed these goals during 2024 by:
Building on our track record as a disciplined capital allocator
o
In a cyclical business such as ours, we believe that capital allocation is not a formula embedded in a financial metric
but levers that we pull at the right times in the cycle. We have a track record of buying vessel assets at low points,
voluntarily decreasing our leverage and returning a substantial amount of cash to shareholders.
o
We paid out $309.4 million in returns to our shareholders during 2024.
2
International Seaways, Inc.
Maintaining our fleet optimization program:
o
We sold one 2009-built MR and two 2008-built MRs, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $72 million after
fees and commissions. We recognized total gains of approximately $41.3 million on these sales.
o
We purchased four 2015-built MRs and two 2014-built MRs en bloc for an aggregate price of $232 million.
Eighty-five percent of the purchase price consideration was funded from available liquidity and the balance of
fifteen percent with the issuance of the Company’s common stock.
o
We declared options to build two additional dual-fuel ready LR1 product carriers at the same shipyard where our
other four newbuild LR1s were contracted. The six LR1s are contracted for delivery between the second half of
2025 and the third quarter of 2026. The total construction cost for the vessels will be approximately $359 million,
which will be paid for through a combination of long-term financing and available liquidity.
o
We opportunistically locked in $83.2 million of minimum revenues (before reduction for brokerage commissions)
on non-cancelable time charters for one LR2 and two MRs with charter expiry dates ranging from January 2027 to
April 2027. At December 31, 2024, the remaining future minimum revenues under these charters (approximately
$69.0 million), when aggregated with the remaining future minimum revenues (excluding any applicable profit
share) under time charters entered into in previous years, totaled approximately $309.6 million.
o
We entered into an agreement under which we agreed to sell one 2010-built VLCC and one 2011-built VLCC for an
aggregate sales price of $116.6 million and purchase three 2015-built MRs from the same counterparty for an
aggregate purchase price of $119.5 million, resulting in a net cash outflow of $2.9 million. One of the MRs was
delivered to the Company on December 30, 2024 and the sale and purchase transactions on the four remaining
vessels closed between January and February 2025.
Executing a number of liquidity enhancing, deleveraging and financing diversification initiatives, including:
o
We prepaid the outstanding principal balance of $20.3 million and terminated the ING Credit Facility.
o
We entered into an agreement to amend and extend our existing $750 Million Credit Facility, under which we had a
remaining term loan balance of $94.6 million and undrawn revolver capacity of $257.4 million at March 31, 2024.
The new agreement consists of a $500 million revolving credit facility (the “$500 Million Revolving Credit
Facility”) that matures in January 2030. By entering into the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility we have (i)
eliminated $19.5 million in mandatory quarterly debt repayments since the balance drawn on closing is not required
to be repaid until maturity, (ii) reduced cash break evens by over $3,000 per day, (iii) extended the maturity profile
of the facility from 2027 to 2030, and (iv) reduced future interest expense through a margin reduction of over 85
basis points.
See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Liquidity
and Sources of Capital,” for further details on these financing transactions.
OUR STRATEGY
Our primary objectives are to (i) maintain safe and reliable vessel operations that improves energy efficiency and reduces our
environmental footprint; (ii) actively manage the size, age and composition of our fleet over the course of market cycles to increase
investment returns and available capital; (iii) maximize cash flows through management of vessel employment in the spot market
through our participation in a number of commercial pools and selective time charters; (iv) defend and grow the market share and
profits of our asset light Crude Tankers Lightering business; (v) execute a disciplined yet flexible capital allocation strategy that is
aligned with the shipping industry cycles by maintaining a strong balance sheet in order to use cash flow generation for opportunistic
fleet investment, further de-levering that reduces cash break evens and/or interest costs and increases return to shareholders; and (vi)
enter into value-creating transactions. The key elements of our strategy are:
Generate strong cash flows through a blend of spot market and period market exposure
We believe we are well-positioned to generate strong cash flows by identifying and taking advantage of attractive chartering
opportunities in the International Flag tanker market. We will continue to pursue an overall chartering strategy, with a substantial spot
rate exposure that provides us with higher returns when the more volatile spot market is stronger.
3
International Seaways, Inc.
We currently deploy the majority of our fleet on a spot rate basis to benefit from market volatility and what we believe are the
traditionally higher returns the spot market offers compared with time charters. We believe this strategy continues to offer significant
upside exposure to the spot market and an opportunity to capture enhanced profit margins at times when vessel demand exceeds
supply. As of December 31, 2024, we participated in six commercial pools as our principal means of participation in the spot
market— Tankers International (“TI”), Maersk Tankers Suezmax Pool (“MAERSK”), Panamax International (“PI”), Clean Products
Tankers Alliance (“CPTA”), Norden Tanker Pool (“NTP”) and Aframax International Pool (“AI”) — each selected for specific
expertise in its respective market. Our continued participation in pools allows us to benefit from economies of scale and higher vessel
utilization rates.
We plan to continue to complement our spot chartering strategy by selectively employing a portion of our vessels on time charters that
provide consistent cash flows. As of December 31, 2024, we had three VLCCs, one Suezmax, one Aframax, one LR2 and eight MRs
on time charters expiring between February 2025 and April 2030. We may seek to place other tonnage on time charters, for storage or
transport, when we can do so at attractive rates.
Actively manage our fleet to maximize return on capital over market cycles.
We will continue to actively manage the size and composition of our fleet through opportunistic accretive acquisitions and
dispositions as part of our effort to achieve above-market returns on capital for our vessel assets and renew our fleet. Using our
commercial, financial and operational expertise, we will continue to execute our plan to opportunistically grow our fleet through the
timely and selective acquisition of high-quality secondhand vessels, resales or newbuild contracts when we believe those acquisitions
will result in attractive returns on invested capital and increased cash flow. We also intend to continue to engage in opportunistic
dispositions where we can achieve attractive values for our vessels relative to their anticipated future earnings from operations as we
assess the market cycle. Taken together, we believe these activities have and will continue to help us maintain a balanced, high-quality
and modern fleet of crude oil and refined product vessels with an enhanced return on invested capital. We believe our balanced and
versatile fleet, our experience and our long-standing relationships with participants in the crude and refined product shipping industry
position us to identify and take advantage of attractive acquisition opportunities in any vessel class in the international market.
Maintain an appropriate and flexible financial profile.
We seek to maintain a strong balance sheet and prudent financial leverage with sufficient liquidity that positions us to take advantage
of attractive strategic opportunities throughout the dynamic tanker cycles of the shipping sector. During 2024, we maintained what we
believe to be reasonable financial leverage for the current point in the tanker cycle. As of December 31, 2024, we had total liquidity on
a consolidated basis of $632.2 million, comprised of $157.5 million of cash and short-term investments and $474.7 million of
remaining undrawn revolver capacity, as well as a Consolidated Net Debt to Assets Value and Consolidated Net Debt to Book Capital
ratios of 15.5% and 22.2%, respectively.
Sustainability and governance initiatives
We are committed to fulfilling our mission of transporting energy safely and efficiently to customers around the world using well-
maintained assets operated by dedicated crews in a diligent and environmentally sustainable manner. We are acutely aware of our role
as a crude and petroleum products transporter in a world gradually transitioning to cleaner energy sources. While we believe that oil
will continue to play a significant role in the global energy landscape during this transition, we are committed to supporting and
adapting to the shift toward cleaner energy. We welcome and support efforts, such as those led by the Task Force on Climate-related
Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”), to increase transparency and to promote investors’ understanding of how we and our industry peers
are addressing the climate change-related risks and opportunities particular to our industry. The Company’s governance, strategy, risk
management and performance monitoring efforts in this area are evolving and will continue to do so over time. We have disclosed
certain information relating to sustainability and governance on our website, including our Sustainability Disclosure Report, aligned
with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Marine Transportation standard, and recommendations provided by the
TCFD. The report includes information on how we monitor, manage and perform on material sustainability and governance issues in
the face of increasing expectations and regulations. Our Sustainability Disclosure Report may be found on our website at
www.intlseas.com and is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
Governance – Our Board of Directors (the “Board”), which had nine members as of December 31, 2024, including seven independent
members, has experts in shipping and compliance and engages in regular discussions relating to environmental matters and the
4
International Seaways, Inc.
Company’s response to climate change-related risks and opportunities. During 2024, the Board established a committee of the Board
to assist the Board in fulfilling its sustainability oversight responsibilities with respect to Environmental and Social policies, strategies
and programs. The Company’s management team, led by the Chief Executive Officer, has the day-to-day responsibility to execute the
action plans as approved by the Board.
Strategy – We are committed to sustainability and governance practices as a part of our core culture. To achieve our goals, we have
taken actions which include:
-
The establishment of a Performance and Sustainability team that is tasked with both educating the organization as
well as putting in place programs and initiatives to expand our decarbonization efforts;
-
The continuing implementation of a third-party data collection and analysis platform which allows data to be
gathered from our vessels for use in advanced analytics with the aim of reducing our fuel consumption and CO2 and
GHG emissions;
-
The inclusion of a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism in both the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility and
the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility. The mechanism has been certified by an independent, leading firm in
sustainability and corporate governance research as meeting sustainability-linked loan principles. The adjustment in
pricing will be linked to the carbon efficiency of the INSW fleet as it relates to reductions in CO2 emissions year-
over-year, such that it aligns with the IMO’s industry reduction targets in GHG emissions by 2050 (as per the 2023
IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships). This key performance indicator is calculated in a
manner consistent with the de-carbonization trajectory outlined in the Poseidon Principles, the global framework by
which financial institutions can assess the climate alignment of their ship finance portfolios. The relevant emissions
data for our fleet will be reported to the applicable Classification Societies, the IMO and the lenders under our
sustainability-linked loan facility. We also intend to make such emissions data publicly available. In addition to this
GHG reduction measure, the pricing mechanism in the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility also includes key
performance indicators relating to crew safety and investment by the Company aimed at improving energy
efficiency and the reduction of emissions;
-
Participation in ITOPF (formerly known as the International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation), the leading not-
for-profit marine ship pollution response advisors;
-
Participation in the Marine Anti-Corruption Network, a global business network of over 220 members whose vision
is a maritime industry free of corruption that enables fair trade to the benefit of society at large;
-
Membership in the Society for Gas as a Marine Fuel, an organization providing expertise on the use of low and zero
carbon marine fuels;
-
Membership on the steering committee of Together in Safety, an industry consortium connecting the maritime sector
to improve safety performance;
-
Participation on the steering committee of the All Aboard Alliance, which aims to make the maritime industry more
diverse and inclusive and to ensure equitable opportunities for everyone;
-
Participation in the North American Marine Environmental Protection Association;
-
Participation as a signatory to the Neptune Declaration on Seafarer Wellbeing and Crew Change, in a worldwide call
to action to improve working conditions for seafarers by increasing transparency around mental health, connectivity,
shore leave, and work/rest hours;
-
Participation as a signatory to the Gulf of Guinea Declaration on the Suppression of Piracy, which has been signed
by more than 500 organizations across the maritime industry and sets out a series of steps to help decrease and end
the threat of piracy in the Gulf of Guinea;
-
The installation of Ballast Water Treatment Systems on vessels to comply with all applicable regulations;
-
Specific consideration of overall fuel consumption when selecting vessel purchase candidates and ships in our fleet
to consider for disposition, in order to reduce our fleet’s contribution to GHG emissions; and
5
International Seaways, Inc.
-
Our continued commitment to practice environmentally and socially responsible ship recycling. Stoppage of work
until identified unsafe working conditions are rectified and improvements in procedures for materials handling were
some of the positive takeaways noted from our most recent recycling projects.
Additionally, we are developing a plan to meet the IMO’s 2050 and interim GHG emissions targets. The pathway to achieve these
targets includes short-term, mid-term and long-term components, such as:
-
We have embarked on a significant Fleet Decarbonization Project to enhance and align our sustainability strategy
with stakeholder expectations. We are undertaking a comprehensive assessment of the future readiness and
decarbonization capabilities of our vessels. This project will set the foundation for a robust formalized transition
plan, ensuring that our fleet is well-prepared to meet the demands of a low-carbon future.
-
We completed the construction of our three dual-fuel LNG VLCCs at Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine
Engineering’s shipyard during 2023. We expect these tankers to be well suited to adhere to future environmental
regulation throughout their life.
-
We are currently constructing six dual-fuel ready LR1s, as discussed in the “2024 in Review” section above.
-
We have installed, and placed a number of additional orders for, energy savings devices such as wake improvement
ducts, propellor boss cap fins (PBCFs), and advanced hull coatings which significantly reduce our carbon footprint
and adhere to future environmental regulations.
-
We are actively studying other technologies, such as e-fuels and carbon capture, which are not yet mature, or
available at scale, but could prove to be an important part of achieving the industry’s decarbonization ambitions.
Risk Management – Due to the nature of our business, environmental and climate change-related risks are included in key risks
discussed at the Board of Directors level. What we believe to be the most significant of such risks are described in the “Item 1A – Risk
Factors” section below.
Metrics and Targets – As a part of the actions described in the “Strategy” section above, we are working to meet the carbon efficiency
targets included in our sustainability-linked loans and to continue to establish other appropriate metrics by which to measure our
performance and drive improvement.
FLEET OPERATIONS
Fleet Summary
As of December 31, 2024, our operating fleet consisted of 78 vessels, 63 of which were owned and 15 of which were chartered in
(including 13 vessels under bareboat charters pursuant to sale and leaseback arrangements which are deemed to be financing
arrangements). Vessels chartered-in include two time charters. The Company is subject to purchase obligations for 10 of the vessels
under sale and leaseback financing arrangements at the end of each bareboat charter. See Note 15, “Leases,” to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information
6
International Seaways, Inc.
relating to the Company’s chartered-in vessels. The Company’s fleet list excludes vessels chartered-in where the duration of the
charter was one year or less at inception, as well as any workboats chartered-in by our Crude Tankers Lightering business.
Total at December 31, 2024
Vessel Fleet and Type
Vessels Owned
Vessels Chartered-
in
Number
Total Dwt
Operating Fleet
Crude Tankers
VLCC
4
9
13
3,910,572
Suezmax
13
—
13
2,061,754
Aframax
4
—
4
452,375
Total
21
9
30
6,424,701
Product Carriers
LR2
1
—
1
112,691
LR1
6
2
8
596,092
MR
35
4
39
1,951,516
Total
42
6
48
2,660,299
Total Owned and Operated Fleet
63
15
78
9,085,000
Newbuild Fleet
LR1
6
—
6
441,600
Total Newbuild Fleet
6
—
6
441,600
Total Operating and Newbuild Fleet
69
15
84
9,526,600
Business Segments
The bulk shipping of crude oil and refined petroleum products has many distinct market segments based largely on the size and design
configuration of vessels required and, in some cases, on the flag of registry. Freight rates in each market segment are determined by a
variety of factors affecting the supply and demand for suitable vessels. Our diverse fleet gives us the ability to provide a broad range
of services to global customers. Tankers and product carriers are not bound to specific ports or schedules and therefore can respond to
market opportunities by moving between trades and geographical areas. The Company has established two reportable business
segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers.
For additional information regarding the Company’s two reportable segments for the three years ended December 31, 2024, see
Note 4, “Business and Segment Reporting,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Crude Tankers (including Crude Tankers Lightering)
Our Crude Tankers reportable business segment is made up of a fleet of VLCCs, Suezmaxes, and Aframaxes engaged in the
worldwide transportation of crude oil.
This segment also includes our Crude Tankers Lightering business through which we provide ship-to-ship (or “STS”) lightering
support services and full-service STS lightering to customers in the U.S. Gulf (“USG”), U.S. Pacific, Grand Bahama and Panama
regions. In STS lightering support service, we provide the personnel and equipment (hoses and fenders) to facilitate the transferring of
cargo between seagoing ships positioned alongside each other, either stationary or underway. In full-service STS lightering, we
provide the lightering vessel, usually an Aframax tanker, in addition to the personnel and equipment to facilitate the transferring of
cargo. Demand for lightering services is significantly affected by the level of crude oil imports into the United States and, in recent
years, by the volumes of crude oil exports from the United States. Our customers include oil companies and trading companies that are
importing or exporting crude oil in the USG to or from larger Suezmax and VLCC vessels, which are prevented from using certain
ports due to their size and draft.
7
International Seaways, Inc.
Product Carriers
Our Product Carriers reportable business segment consists of a fleet of MRs, LR1 product carriers, and an LR2 product carrier
engaged in the worldwide transportation of refined petroleum products. Refined petroleum product cargoes are transported from
refineries to consuming markets characterized by both long and short-haul routes. The market for these product cargoes is driven by
global refinery capacity, changes in consumer demand and product specifications and cargo arbitrage opportunities. In contrast to the
crude oil tanker market, the refined petroleum trades are more complex due to the diverse nature of product cargoes, which include
gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, home heating oil, vegetable oils and organic chemicals (e.g., methanol and ethylene glycols). The trades
require crew to have specialized certifications. Customer vetting requirements can be more rigorous and, in general, vessel operations
are more complex due to the fact that refineries can be in closer proximity to importing nations, resulting in more frequent port calls
and more discharging, cleaning and loading operations than crude oil tankers. The Company’s MR product carriers are IMO III
compliant, allowing those vessels to carry edible oils, such as palm and vegetable oil, increasing flexibility when switching between
cargo grades.
In order to take advantage of market conditions and optimize economic performance, we employ our LR1 Product Carriers, which
currently participate in the PI pool, in the transportation of crude oil cargoes.
Commercial and Technical Management of Fleet – Hybrid Operating Model
We employ a hybrid operating model in the commercial and technical management of our fleet. Our in-house commercial and
technical management experts utilize third-party service providers to execute our commercial and technical operations, while
providing us with the flexibility to scale operations up or down with our fleet across various shipping cycles.
Commercial Pools and other Commercial Management Arrangements
We currently utilize third-party managed pools as the principal commercial strategy for our vessels participating in the spot voyage
charter markets. By operating a large number of vessels as an integrated transportation system, commercial pools offer customers
greater flexibility and a higher level of service while achieving scheduling efficiencies. Pools are commercially managed by
experienced commercial operators that, among other things, arrange charters for the vessels participating in the pool in exchange for
an administrative fee. Technical management is performed or outsourced by each shipowner. The pools collect revenue from
customers, pay voyage-related expenses, and distribute TCE revenues to the participants after deducting administrative fees, according
to formulas that capture the contribution of each vessel to the pool by:
first, summarizing the earnings capacity of each vessel (as determined by the pool operator based largely on the physical
characteristics and fuel consumption) to a number of “points;”
second, multiplying each vessel’s “points” by the number of days that vessel operated during a specified period (the
“Vessel Contribution”);
third, multiplying the total number of points of all vessels in the pool by the total number of days all vessels in the pool
operated (the “Total Earnings”); and
fourth, dividing the Vessel Contribution by the Total Earnings.
Pools negotiate charters with customers primarily in the spot market. The size and scope of these pools enable them to enhance
utilization for pool vessels by securing backhaul voyages and Contracts of Affreightment (“COAs”), thereby reducing wait time and
providing a high level of service to customers.
We also employ third-party commercial managers on a limited basis for some of our vessels from time-to-time in the spot market
through Commercial Management Agreements (“CMAs”). Under the CMAs, the manager collects revenue, pays for voyage related
expenses and distributes the actual voyage results for each individual ship under management and receives a management fee.
8
International Seaways, Inc.
The table below summarizes the pool deployment of our conventional tanker fleet as of December 31, 2024:
(a) We took delivery of a 2015-built MR on December 30, 2024 and the vessel went on to its scheduled drydock. The vessel will
join Clean Products Tankers Alliance Pool after the completion of drydock in 2025.
Spot Market
Voyage charters, including vessels operating in commercial pools that predominantly operate in the spot market, constituted 86% of
the Company’s aggregate TCE revenues in 2024 compared to 91% in 2023. Accordingly, the Company’s shipping revenues are
significantly affected by the amount of available tonnage both at the time such tonnage is required and over the period of projected
use, and the levels of seaborne and shore-based inventories of crude oil and refined products.
Seasonal trends affect world oil consumption and consequently vessel demand. While trends in consumption vary with seasons, peaks
in demand quite often precede the seasonal consumption peaks as refiners and suppliers try to anticipate consumer demand. Seasonal
peaks in oil demand have been principally driven by increased demand prior to Northern Hemisphere winters and increased demand
for gasoline prior to the summer driving season in the United States. Available tonnage is affected over time by the volume of
newbuilding deliveries, the number of tankers used to store clean products and crude oil, and the removal (principally through vessel
recycling or conversion) of existing vessels from service. Vessel recycling is affected by the level of freight rates, recycling prices,
vetting standards established by charterers and terminals and by international and U.S. governmental regulations that establish
maintenance standards and regulatory compliance standards.
9
International Seaways, Inc.
Time Charter Market
Time charters constituted 14% and 9% of the Company’s TCE revenues in 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we
had three VLCCs, one Suezmax, one Aframax, one LR2 and eight MRs deployed on non-cancelable time charters expiring between
February 2025 and April 2030. Within a contract period, time charters provide a predictable level of revenues without the
fluctuations inherent in spot-market rates. Once a time charter expires, however, the ability to secure a new time charter may be
uncertain and subject to market conditions at such time. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations — General,” for further information on the future minimum revenues, before reduction for brokerage
commissions, expected to be received on our non-cancelable time charters.
Technical Management
In an effort to streamline our operations, during 2022, we began the process of paring down the number of outsourced third-party
technical managers to only two managers from five managers. This transition process was successfully completed during the second
quarter of 2023. The managers supervise the technical management of our vessels and the integrity of our operations to ensure
industry leading safety, compliance, environmental protection and service quality. We retain a pool of well-trained seafarers to serve
on our vessels. We continue to hire the crew, with the managers acting as agents on our behalf.
In addition to regular maintenance and repair, crews onboard each vessel and shoreside personnel must ensure that the vessels in the
Company’s fleet meet or exceed regulatory standards established by organizations such as the IMO and the U.S. Coast Guard.
HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2024, we had 2,824 employees comprised of 2,757 seafarers employed on our fleet and 67 shoreside staff.
We believe a commitment to and investment in human capital management helps us build competitive advantage and furthers our
long-term success. Our highly skilled seafarers and shoreside employees are the foundation of everything that we do and the
embodiment of our “do the right thing” culture. We depend on our workforce to provide superior service and to ensure our vessels are
operated safely and securely. Our seafarers are hired by the technical managers acting as agent for the individual ship owning
companies, each of which is a subsidiary of INSW. All of the seafarers onboard our vessels are represented by collective bargaining
agreements. We consider our seafarers and union relationships to be strong.
To facilitate the recruitment, development and retention of our valuable seafarers and shoreside employees, we strive to make INSW
an inclusive and safe workplace, with opportunities for our employees to grow and develop in their careers.
Talent Development
To support the advancement of our employees, we offer training and development programs encouraging advancement from within.
We leverage both formal and informal programs to identify, foster, and retain top seafarer and shoreside talent. On average, our
seafarers have worked for us for more than 10 years and more than half of our shore-based employees have worked for us for at least
16 years. For our seafarers, ongoing training is integral to conducting safe operations and keeping employees engaged. One key part of
our training regimen is our crew conferences. Senior leaders from the Company, our fleet and our third-party managers spend three
days with up to 100 seafarers from across our fleet, representing all ranks and nationalities. During the conferences, the seafarers are
updated on new policies, regulations, and procedures. Interactive learning sessions and team building exercises are used to foster
communication and shared learnings. Day long training sessions are capped off with a social agenda that celebrates successes during
the year and includes the presentation of awards for long time service with the Company. This presents management with both an
opportunity to teach and to learn and provides everyone with an excellent networking opportunity.
Succession Planning
Our Board of Directors believe that planning for succession is an important function. We continually strive to foster the professional
development of management and team members. We continue to invest in developing a very experienced and strong group of leaders,
10
International Seaways, Inc.
with their performance subject to ongoing monitoring and evaluation, as potential successors to our senior management, including our
CEO.
Broad-based workforce
We are committed to attracting a talented, experienced and broad-based workforce. We believe unique ideas and perspectives fuel
innovation and our differences make us stronger and better. We value difference in gender, race, ethnicity, age, gender identity, sexual
orientation, ability, cultural background, religion, veteran status, experience, thought, and more across the globe. We recognize the
importance of teams from different backgrounds and a broad-based culture in driving innovation and competitiveness.
Our Board of Directors and executive management team each represent a broad spectrum of backgrounds and perspectives. We
believe that our nine member Board of Directors (three of whom are women and one of whom is an underrepresented minority) and
our seven member executive leadership team (two of whom are women and one of whom is an underrepresented minority) are varied
by ethnic heritage, non-U.S. place of birth, or gender and reflect our ongoing commitment to hiring, developing, and retaining talent
from different backgrounds.
As of December 31, 2024
Female
Male
Shoreside Employees
26
41
Seafarers
3
2,754
Total Employees
29
2,795
As of December 31, 2024
Female
Male
Board of Directors(a)
3
6
Non-Director Senior Management
—
5
Non-Director Senior Management Direct Reports
25
36
(a) Includes our CEO who is also a member of the Board of Directors
We recognize the need to address gender representation in our industry. While we take pride in the wide range of nationalities
represented among our seafarers, we acknowledge that our crews are almost entirely male. Unfortunately, this gender disparity is not
unique to our company but prevalent across the broader shipping industry, as only 2% of the crewing population is female, the
majority of whom sail in the cruise and leisure segments. We are committed to overcoming hurdles to women’s career opportunities at
sea, ensuring safety, and fostering an environment in which all people can thrive.
International Seaways is a founding member of the Global Maritime Forum’s All Aboard Alliance, a transformative industry initiative
aimed at fostering a broad-based workforce both ashore and at sea. As part of this significant commitment, we actively participate in
the Diversity@Sea project, a focused endeavor dedicated to enhancing career opportunities for women in the maritime industry.
Safety, Quality and Health
We are committed to creating a safe, healthy and secure workplace at sea and onshore. We are also committed to providing safe,
reliable and environmentally sound transportation to our customers. Integral to meeting standards mandated by worldwide regulators
and customers is a ship manager’s use of robust Safety Management Systems (“SMS”). The SMS is a framework of processes and
procedures that addresses a spectrum of operational risks associated with quality, environment, health and safety. The SMS is certified
by the International Safety Management Code (“ISM Code”), promulgated by the IMO and the International Standards Organization
(“ISO”), and meets ISO 9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) requirements. To support a culture
of transparency, accountability and compliance, we have an open reporting system on all of our ships, whereby seafarers can
anonymously report possible violations of our or our third-party technical and commercial manager’s policies and procedures. All
open reports are investigated, and appropriate actions are taken when necessary.
Our commitment to safety also extends to our continued response to changes in how we work and collaborate shoreside. In 2024, we
have maintained the hybrid work schedule introduced in 2022, taking into account collaboration, convenience and work-life balance
for our shoreside employees.
11
International Seaways, Inc.
COMPETITION
The shipping industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with other owners of International Flag tankers, including
other independent shipowners, integrated oil companies, state-owned entities with their own fleets, and oil traders with logistical
operations. Our vessels compete with all other vessels of a size and type required by the customer that can be available at the date and
location specified. In the spot market, competition is based primarily on price, cargo quantity and cargo type, although charterers are
selective with respect to the quality of the vessels they hire considering other key factors such as the reliability, age and quality and
efficiency of operations and experience of crews. In the time charter market, factors such as the age and quality of the vessel and the
efficiency of its operation and reputation of its owner and operator tend to be even more significant when competing for business.
Our lightering business competes against a small number of other market participants, both in the United States and in other
jurisdictions in which we operate.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SECURITY MATTERS RELATING TO BULK SHIPPING
Government regulation significantly affects the operation of the Company’s vessels. INSW’s vessels operate in a heavily regulated
environment and are subject to international conventions and international, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the
countries in which such vessels operate or are registered.
The Company’s vessels undergo regular and rigorous safety inspections and audits which are conducted by the ships’ third-party
managers. In addition, a variety of governmental and private entities subject the Company’s vessels to both scheduled and
unscheduled inspections. These entities include USCG, local port state control authorities (harbor master or equivalent), coastal states,
Classification Societies, flag state administration (country of registry) and customers, particularly major oil companies and petroleum
terminal operators. Certain of these entities require INSW to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of the
Company’s vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require INSW to incur substantial costs or temporarily
suspend operation of one or more of the Company’s vessels.
The Company believes that the heightened level of environmental, health, safety and quality awareness among various stakeholders,
including lenders, insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers, is leading to greater safety and other regulatory requirements and
a more stringent inspection regime on all vessels. The Company is required to maintain operating standards for all of its vessels
emphasizing operational safety and quality, environmental stewardship, preventive planned maintenance, continuous training of its
officers and crews and compliance with international and U.S. regulations. INSW believes that the operation of its vessels is in
compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, because such laws and regulations are changed frequently,
and new laws and regulations impose new or increasingly stringent requirements, INSW cannot predict the cost of complying with
requirements beyond those that are currently in force. The impact of future regulatory requirements on operations or the resale value
or useful lives of its vessels may result in substantial additional costs in meeting new legal and regulatory requirements. See Item 1A,
“Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Company — Risks relating to legal and regulatory matters, compliance with complex laws,
regulations and, in particular, environmental laws or regulations, including those relating to the emission of greenhouse gases, may
adversely affect INSW’s business.”
International and U.S. Greenhouse Gas Regulations
In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (commonly called the Kyoto
Protocol) became effective. Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce
emissions of certain gases, generally referred to as greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), which contribute to global warming. The Kyoto
Protocol, which was adopted by about 190 countries, commits its parties by setting internationally binding emission reduction targets.
In December 2012, the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol was adopted to further extend the Kyoto Protocol’s GHG emissions
reductions through 2020. In December 2015, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”) forged a
new international framework (the “Paris Agreement”) that became effective in November 2016, after it had been ratified by a
sufficient number of countries. The Paris Agreement sets a goal of holding the increase in global average temperature to well below 2
degrees Celsius and pursuing efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius, to be achieved by aiming to reach a global peaking of
GHG emissions as soon as possible. To meet these objectives, the participating countries, acting individually or jointly, are to develop
and implement successive “nationally determined contributions.” The countries assessed their collective programs toward achieving
12
International Seaways, Inc.
the goals of the Paris Agreement in 2023 and agreed to reassess such programs every five years thereafter, referred to as the global
stock take, and subsequently are to update and enhance their actions on climate change. The Paris Agreement does not specifically
require controls on shipping or other industries, but it is possible that countries or groups of countries will seek to impose such
controls as they implement the Paris Agreement. The United States rejoined the Paris Agreement in February 2021, and, in April
2021, announced a new, more rigorous nationally determined emissions reduction level target of 50-52% reduction from 2005 levels
in economy wide net GHG pollution by 2030. However, in January 2025, President Trump directed the United States to withdraw
from the Paris Agreement by an Executive Order. In November 2021, at UNFCCC’s COP26 in Glasgow, new initiatives to
incorporate shipping in the climate change framework were proposed. These proposals remain either voluntary among countries or
represent efforts towards building consensus for further work within the maritime industry. In particular, at COP26, a coalition of 19
countries including the United Kingdom and the United States signed the Clydebank Declaration to support and facilitate the
establishment of at least six green shipping corridors – zero emission maritime routes between two or more ports -- by 2025, with a
view toward increasing the number of green corridors over the longer term. The Declaration noted that voluntary participation by
operators would be essential. As of October 2024, 62 green corridor initiatives have been announced, six of which had moved to the
preparation stage.
In 2014, IMO’s third study of GHG emissions from the global shipping fleet predicted that, in the absence of appropriate policies,
GHG emissions from ships may increase by 50% to 250% by 2050 due to expected growth in international seaborne trade. Methane
emissions are projected to increase rapidly (albeit from a low base) as the share of LNG in the fuel mix increases. With respect to
energy efficiency measures, the Marine Environmental Protection Committee (“MEPC”) adopted guidelines on the Energy Efficiency
Design Index (“EEDI”), which reflects the primary fuel for the calculation of the attained EEDI for ships having dual fuel engines
using LNG and liquid fuel oil (see discussion below). IMO is committed to developing limits on greenhouse gases from international
shipping and is working on proposed mandatory technical and operational measures to achieve these limits. In April 2018, IMO
adopted an initial strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships, with the ultimate goal of eliminating GHG emissions from
international shipping as soon as possible during this century. More specifically, under the identified “levels of ambition,” the initial
strategy envisages the halt of the growth in GHG emissions from international shipping as soon as possible and then the reduction of
the total annual GHG emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels. In 2019, IMO launched a project for an initial
two-year period to initiate and promote global efforts to demonstrate and test technical solutions for reducing GHG emissions and
improve energy efficiency throughout the maritime sector. In 2020, IMO issued its Fourth GHG Study, which further refined IMO’s
understanding of maritime greenhouse gas emissions and reported updated projections that in 2050 GHG emissions will increase from
0 to 50% over 2018 levels, which is equal to 90-130% of 2008 levels.
At the MEPC 76 in June 2021, the IMO, taking into account the findings of the Fourth GHG Study, adopted short-term measures that
became effective in 2023 to implement its stated goals of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping by 40% by
2030 and 70% by 2050, and GHG emissions from international shipping by 50% by 2050. The new measures will require ships to
calculate their Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (“EEXI”) and to establish their annual operational carbon intensity indicator
(“CII”) that links the GHG emissions to the amount of cargo carried over distance traveled. Ships with low ratings are required to
submit corrective action plans.
MEPC 78 in June 2022 marked a significant step towards achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the shipping industry by
reiterating the commitment to revise the initial IMO GHG strategy with a strengthened ambition to reach net-zero emissions by around
2050, while also discussing and developing mid-term measures to achieve this goal; essentially, IMO signaled a strong push for the
maritime industry to transition towards net-zero emissions by 2050. The main focus of MEPC 78 was to further develop plans for
revising the initial IMO GHG strategy, aiming to include more ambitious targets for reducing emissions, including a pathway to net-
zero emissions by 2050. The committee discussed and approved further development of a “basket of candidate mid-term GHG
reduction measures,” which could include technical and carbon pricing elements to facilitate the transition towards net-zero. MEPC 78
acknowledged the need for more information regarding the readiness and availability of low- and zero-carbon marine fuels and
technologies to support the revision process. The revised strategy was adopted in July 2023 at MEPC 80. Supporting technical and
economic measures are still under development.
In 2011, the European Commission established a working group on shipping to provide input to the European Commission in its work
to develop and assess options for the inclusion of international maritime transport in the GHG reduction commitment of the EU. The
Measure, Report and Verify (“MRV”) Regulation was adopted on April 29, 2015 and created an EU-wide framework for the
monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport. The MRV Regulation requires large ships
(over 5,000 gross tons) calling at EU ports from January 1, 2018, to collect and later publish verified annual data on carbon dioxide
emissions.
13
International Seaways, Inc.
IMO has developed similar MRV regulations that became effective on March 1, 2018 and the first reporting period was for the
full year 2019. In July 2021, the EU issued draft legislation that from 2023 to 2026 would phase in GHG emissions from shipping into
its established Emissions Trading Scheme (“ETS”) and require the purchase of allowances reflecting the emissions. In December
2022, the EU Council and Parliament agreed to include maritime shipping emissions in the EU ETS, with a gradual introduction of
obligations for shipping companies to surrender allowances: 40% for verified emissions from 2024, 70% for 2025 and 100% for 2026.
It was also agreed to include non-carbon dioxide emissions (methane and nitrous oxide) in the MRV scheme from 2024 and in the EU
ETS from 2026. The Company cannot predict the specific impacts of the EU ETS on the shipping industry as a whole. To date, the EU
ETS has not had a material impact on the Company because the Company has been able to pass on the cost of the emissions
allowances contractually to charterers.
In an effort to further reduce GHG emissions from the maritime sector, the EU has introduced the FuelEU Maritime regulation, which
came into effect on January 1, 2025. This regulation imposes annual penalties on vessels trading to and from European ports based
on their GHG emissions, which are determined by the fuel consumed and the length of the voyage.
The FuelEU Maritime regulation is designed to incentivize the use of low-emission fuels by providing reduced penalties for vessels
operating on alternative fuels such as LNG, biofuels, ammonia and other low-carbon alternatives. The penalties increase
progressively over time, with vessels operating on LNG expected to remain largely unaffected until approximately 2035.
Additionally, the regulation allows vessel owners to offset emissions across their fleet, enabling them to pool credits and deficits
between over-performing and under-performing vessels.
Similar to the EU ETS, most vessel owners are incorporating contractual provisions in their charterparties to pass on FuelEU Maritime
liabilities to charterers. This measure aims to ensure that compliance costs associated with the regulation are allocated appropriately
within the commercial framework of vessel operations.
The Company cannot predict the precise financial or operational impact of FuelEU Maritime on the shipping industry or on the
Company at this time. However, as the regulation evolves and penalties increase, it is expected to influence fuel choices, where and
how vessels are fixed and contractual negotiations between vessel owners and charterers.
In the United States, pursuant to U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2007 and 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
has authority to regulate GHG emissions under the U.S. Clean Air Act. Although the EPA has promulgated certain regulations relating
to GHG emissions, to date the regulations proposed and enacted by the EPA have not involved ocean-going vessels. The EPA does
participate in the U.S. delegation to the IMO and the Biden administration had committed to participating more actively in
international efforts to control GHG emissions, including the IMO’s; however, it is not expected that such efforts will continue under
the Trump administration.
Future passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, EU, United States or other countries where
INSW operates that restrict emissions of GHGs could require significant additional capital and/or operating expenditures and could
have operational impacts on INSW’s business. Although we cannot predict such expenditures and impacts with certainty at this time,
they may be material to INSW’s results of operations.
International Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards
Liability Standards and Limits
Many countries have ratified and follow the liability plan adopted by the IMO and set out in the International Convention on Civil
Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969 (the “1969 Convention”). Some of these countries have also adopted the 1992 Protocol to
the 1969 Convention (the “1992 Protocol”). Under both the 1969 Convention and the 1992 Protocol, a vessel’s registered owner is
strictly liable for pollution damage caused in the territory, including the territorial waters (and in the exclusive economic zone under
the 1992 Protocol) of a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject to certain complete defenses. Both instruments apply to
all seagoing vessels carrying oil in bulk as cargo. These instruments also limit the liability of the shipowner under certain
circumstances. As these instruments calculate liability in terms of a basket of currencies, the figures in this section are converted into
U.S. dollars based on currency exchange rates on January 24, 2025 and are approximate. Actual dollar amounts are used in this section
“Liability Standards and Limits” and in “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards - Liability Standards and Limits”
below.
14
International Seaways, Inc.
Under the 1969 Convention, except where the pollution damage resulted from the actual fault or privity of the owner, its liability is
limited to $174 per ton of the vessel’s tonnage, with a maximum liability of $18.2 million. Under the 1992 Protocol, the liability of the
owner is limited to $3.9 million for a ship not exceeding 5,000 units of tonnage (a unit of measurement for the total enclosed spaces
within a vessel) and $587 per gross ton thereafter, with a maximum liability of $77.8 million. Under the 1992 Protocol, the owner's
liability is limited except where the pollution damage results from its personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such
damage, or recklessly and with knowledge that such damage would probably result. Under the 2000 amendments to the 1992 Protocol,
which became effective on November 1, 2003, liability is limited to $5.9 million plus $822 for each additional gross ton over 5,000 for
vessels of 5,000 to 140,000 gross tons, with a maximum liability of $116.9 million subject to the exceptions discussed above for the
1992 Protocol.
Vessels trading to states that are parties to these instruments must provide evidence of insurance covering the liability of the owner.
The Company believes that its P&I insurance will cover any liability under the plan adopted by the IMO. See the discussion of
insurance in “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards-Liability Standards and Limits” below.
The United States is not a party to the 1969 Convention or the 1992 Protocol. See “U.S. Environmental and Safety Restrictions and
Regulations” below. In other jurisdictions where the 1969 Convention has not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common
law govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to that convention.
The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001, which was adopted on March 23, 2001 and
became effective on November 21, 2008, is a separate convention adopted to ensure that adequate, prompt and effective compensation
is available to persons who suffer damage caused by spills of oil when used as fuel by vessels. The convention applies to damage
caused to the territory, including the territorial sea, and exclusive economic zones, of states that are party to it. Vessels operating
internationally are subject to it if sailing within the territories of those countries that have implemented its provisions (which does not
include the United States). Key features of this convention are compulsory insurance or other financial security for vessels over 1,000
gross tons to cover the liability of the registered owner for pollution damage and direct action against the insurer. The Company
believes that its vessels comply with these requirements.
Other International Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards
Under the ISM Code, promulgated by the IMO, vessel operators are required to develop a safety management system that includes,
among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy describing how the objectives of a functional safety
management system will be met. The third-party managers of INSW’s vessels, have safety management systems for the Company’s
fleet, with instructions and procedures for the safe operation of its vessels, reporting accidents and non-conformities, internal audits
and management reviews and responding to emergencies, as well as defined levels of responsibility. The ISM Code requires a
Document of Compliance (“DoC”) to be obtained for the company responsible for operating the vessel and a Safety Management
Certificate (“SMC”) to be obtained for each vessel that such company operates. Once issued, these certificates are valid for a
maximum of five years. The company operating the vessel in turn must undergo an annual internal audit and an external verification
audit in order to maintain the DoC. In accordance with the ISM Code, each vessel must also undergo an annual internal audit at
intervals not to exceed twelve months and vessels must undergo an external verification audit twice in a five-year period. The
Company’s third-party managers have DoCs for their offices.
The SMC is issued after verifying that the company responsible for operating the vessel and its shipboard management operate in
accordance with the approved safety management system. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless its operator has been awarded a
DoC issued by the administration of that vessel’s flag state or as otherwise permitted under the International Convention for the Safety
of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (“SOLAS”).
IMO regulations also require owners and operators of vessels to adopt Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plans (“SOPEPs”).
Periodic training and drills for response personnel and for vessels and their crews are required. In addition to SOPEPs, INSW has
adopted Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans, which cover potential releases not only of oil but of any noxious liquid
substances. Noncompliance with the ISM Code and other IMO regulations may subject the shipowner or charterer to increased
liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or
detention in, some ports. For example, the USCG and EU authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code
will be prohibited from trading to United States and EU ports.
15
International Seaways, Inc.
The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (“BWM Convention”) is
designed to protect the marine environment from the introduction of non-native (alien) species as a result of the carrying of ships’
ballast water from one place to another. The introduction of non-native species has been identified as one of the top five threats to
biological diversity. Expanding seaborne trade and traffic have exacerbated the threat. Tankers must take on ballast water in order to
maintain their stability and draft and must discharge the ballast water when they load their next cargo. When emptying the ballast
water, which they carried from the previous port, they may release organisms and pathogens that have been identified as being
potentially harmful in the new environment.
The BWM Convention defines a discharge standard consisting of maximum allowable levels of critical invasive species, which
standard is met by installing treatment systems that render the invasive species non-viable. In addition, each vessel is required to have
on board a valid International Ballast Water Management Certificate, a Ballast Water Management Plan and a Ballast Water Record
Book.
INSW’s vessels are subject to other international, national and local ballast water management regulations (including those described
below under “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards”). INSW complies with these regulations through ballast
water management plans implemented on each of the vessels in its fleet. To meet existing and anticipated ballast water treatment
requirements, including those contained in the BWM Convention, INSW has a fleetwide action plan to comply with IMO, EPA,
USCG and possibly more stringent U.S. state mandates as they are implemented and become effective, which may require the
installation and use of costly control technologies. Compliance with the ballast water requirements effective under the BWM
Convention and other regulations may have material impacts on INSW’s operations and financial results, as discussed below under
“U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards-Other U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards.”
Other EU Legislation and Regulations
The EU has adopted legislation that: (1) bans manifestly sub-standard vessels (defined as those over 15 years old that have been
detained by port authorities at least twice in the course of the preceding 24 months) from European waters, creates an obligation for
port states to inspect at least 25% of vessels using their ports annually and provides for increased surveillance of vessels posing a high
risk to maritime safety or the marine environment, and (2) provides the EU with greater authority and control over Classification
Societies, including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of negligent societies. INSW believes that none of its vessels
meet the definitions of a “sub-standard” vessel contained in the EU legislation. EU directives require EU member states to introduce
criminal sanctions for illicit ship-source discharges of polluting substances (e.g., from tank cleaning operations) which result in
deterioration in the quality of water and has been committed with intent, recklessness or serious negligence. Certain member states of
the EU, by virtue of their national legislation, already impose criminal sanctions for pollution events under certain circumstances. The
Company cannot predict what additional legislation or regulations, if any, may be promulgated by the EU or any other country or
authority, or how these might impact INSW.
International Air Emission Standards
Annex VI to MARPOL (“Annex VI”) sets limits on sulfur oxide (“SOx”) and nitrogen oxide (“NOx”) emissions from ship exhausts
and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also regulates shipboard
incineration and the emission of volatile organic compounds from tankers. Under Annex VI, the global cap on the sulfur content of
fuel oil is currently 0.50% and the sulfur content of fuel oil for vessels operating in designated Emission Control Areas (“ECAs”) is
0.1%. Currently designated ECAs are the Baltic Sea area, the North Sea area, the North American area (covering designated coastal
areas off the United States and Canada) and the United States Caribbean Sea area (around Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin
Islands). For vessels over 400 gross tons, Annex VI imposes various survey and certification requirements. The U.S. Maritime
Pollution Prevention Act of 2008 amended the U.S. Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships to provide for the adoption of Annex VI. In
October 2008, the U.S. ratified Annex VI, which came into force in the United States on January 8, 2009.
In addition to Annex VI, there are regional mandates in ports and certain territorial waters within the EU, Turkey, China and Norway,
for example, regarding reduced SOx emissions. These requirements establish maximum allowable limits for sulfur content in fuel oils
used by vessels when operating within certain areas and waters and while “at berth.” In December 2012, an EU directive that aligned
the EU requirements with Annex VI entered into force. For vessels at berth in EU ports, sulfur content of fuel oil is limited to 0.1%.
For vessels operating in SOx Emission Control Areas (“SECAs”), sulfur content of fuel oil is limited to 0.1%. For vessels operating
outside SECAs, sulfur content of fuel oil is limited to 0.5%. Alternatively, emission abatement methods are permitted as long as they
continuously achieve reductions of SOx emissions that are at least equivalent to those obtained using compliant marine fuels.
16
International Seaways, Inc.
More stringent Tier III emission limits are applicable to engines installed on a ship constructed on or after January 1, 2016 operating
in ECAs. NOx emission Tier III standards came into force on January 1, 2016 in ECAs, and require the use of high efficiency
emission control technology such as selective catalytic reduction to achieve NOx reductions 80 percent below the pre-2016 levels.
Additional air emission requirements under Annex VI mandate the development of Volatile Organic Compound (“VOC”)
Management Plans for tank vessels and certain gas ships.
The Company believes that its vessels are compliant with the current requirements of Annex VI and that those of its vessels that
operate in the EU, Turkey, China, Norway and elsewhere are also compliant with the regional mandates applicable there. However,
the Company anticipates that, in the next several years, compliance with the increasingly stringent requirements of Annex VI and
other conventions, laws and regulations imposing air emission standards that have already been adopted or that may be adopted will
require substantial additional capital and/or operating expenditures and could have operational impacts on INSW’s business. Although
INSW cannot predict such expenditures and impacts with certainty at this time, they may be material to INSW’s financial statements.
SOLAS
From January 1, 2014, various amendments to the SOLAS conventions came into force, including an amendment to Chapter VI of
SOLAS, which prohibits the blending of bulk liquid cargoes during sea passage and the production process on board ships. This
prohibition does not preclude the master of the vessel from undertaking cargo transfers for the safety of the ship or protection of the
marine environment.
MARPOL
Effective March 1, 2018, pursuant to an amendment to MARPOL Annex V, shippers are required to determine whether or not their
cargo is hazardous and classify it in line with the criteria of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification.
Vessels are required to maintain a new format garbage record book, which is divided into two parts: cargo residues and garbage other
than cargo residues. The cargo residues part must be further divided into hazardous and non-hazardous to the marine environment
cargo. More stringent discharge requirements apply to hazardous cargo residues.
U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards
The United States regulates the shipping industry with an extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental protection and
cleanup of oil spills, consisting primarily of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”), and the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade with the
United States or its territories or possessions, or whose vessels operate in the waters of the United States, which include the U.S.
territorial sea and the 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone around the United States. CERCLA applies to the discharge of
hazardous substances (other than oil) whether on land or at sea. Both OPA 90 and CERCLA impact the Company’s operations.
Liability Standards and Limits
Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat or demise charterers are “responsible parties” who are liable, without regard to
fault, for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages, including property and natural resource damages and economic loss
without physical damage to property, arising from oil spills and pollution from their vessels. On December 9, 2022, USCG issued a
final rule, effective March 23, 2023, increasing the limits of OPA 90 liability with respect to (i) tanker vessels with a qualifying
double hull to the greater of $2,500 per gross ton or approximately $21.5 million per vessel that is over 3,000 gross tons; and (ii) non-
tanker vessels, to the greater of $1,300 per gross ton or approximately $1.1 million per vessel. The statute specifically permits
individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and
some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of pollutants within their waters. In some cases,
states that have enacted this type of legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessel owners’ responsibilities
under these laws. CERCLA, which applies to owners and operators of vessels, contains a similar liability regime and provides for
cleanup, removal and natural resource damages associated with discharges of hazardous substances (other than oil). Liability under
CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5 million for vessels that carry hazardous substance as cargo or residue.
17
International Seaways, Inc.
These limits of liability do not apply, however, where the incident is caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction
or operating regulations, or by the responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. Similarly, these limits do not apply if
the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with the substance removal
activities. OPA 90 and CERCLA each preserve the right to recover damages under existing law, including maritime tort law.
OPA 90 also requires owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the USCG evidence of financial responsibility
sufficient to meet the limit of their potential strict liability under the statute. The USCG enacted regulations requiring evidence of
financial responsibility consistent with the previous limits of liability described above for OPA 90 and CERCLA. Under the
regulations, evidence of financial responsibility may be demonstrated by insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, guaranty or an
alternative method subject to approval by the Director of the USCG National Pollution Funds Center. Under OPA 90 regulations, an
owner or operator of more than one vessel is required to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility for the entire fleet in an
amount equal only to the financial responsibility requirement of the vessel having the greatest maximum strict liability under OPA 90
and CERCLA. INSW has provided the requisite guarantees and has received certificates of financial responsibility from the USCG for
each of its vessels required to have one.
INSW has insurance for each of its vessels with pollution liability insurance in the amount of $1 billion. However, a catastrophic spill
could exceed the insurance coverage available, in which event there could be a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
In addition to potential liability under OPA 90, vessel owners may in some instances incur liability on an even more stringent basis
under state law in the particular state where the spillage occurred. The State of California’s Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill
Prevention and Response Act requires vessels of a specified size and oil carrying capacity that operate in California waters to have a
California State certificate of financial responsibility (“COFR”) equal to at least $2 billion and imposes certain criminal fines in the
event of an oil spill.
Other U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards
OPA 90 also amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require owners and operators of vessels to adopt vessel response
plans, including marine salvage and firefighting plans, for reporting and responding to vessel emergencies and oil spill scenarios up to
a “worst case” scenario and to identify and ensure, through contracts or other approved means, the availability of necessary private
response resources to respond to a “worst case discharge.” The plans must include contractual commitments with clean-up response
contractors and salvage and marine firefighters in order to ensure an immediate response to an oil spill/vessel emergency. Each vessel
has an USCG approved plan on file with the USCG and onboard the vessel. These plans are regularly reviewed and updated.
OPA 90 requires training programs and periodic drills for shoreside staff and response personnel and for vessels and their crews.
INSW’s third-party technical managers conduct such required training programs and periodic drills.
OPA 90 does not prevent individual U.S. states from imposing their own liability regimes with respect to oil pollution incidents
occurring within their boundaries. In fact, most U.S. states that border a navigable waterway have enacted environmental pollution
laws that impose strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous
substance. These laws are in some cases more stringent than U.S. federal law.
In addition, the U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in U.S. navigable waters and
imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of
removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under the more recent OPA 90 and CERCLA, discussed
above.
At the federal level in the United States, ballast water management is subject to two separate, partially interrelated regulatory regimes.
One is administered by the USCG under the National Aquatic Nuisance and Control Act and National Invasive Species Act, and the
other is administered by the EPA under the CWA.
Under the USCG’s final rule on ballast water management for the control of nonindigenous species in U.S. waters, which generally is
in line with the requirements set out in the BWM Convention, the treatment systems for domestic and foreign vessels operating in U.S.
waters must be Type Approved by the USCG. INSW’s vessels discharging ballast in U.S. waters currently have, or INSW expects
such vessels will have, Type Approved treatment systems by their extended compliance dates.
The discharge of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normal operation of vessels in U.S. ports also is subject to CWA
permitting requirements. In accordance with the EPA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, the Company is subject to a
Vessel General Permit (“VGP”), which addresses, among other matters, the discharge of ballast water and effluents.
18
International Seaways, Inc.
The current VGP identifies twenty-six vessel discharge streams and establishes numeric ballast water discharge limits that generally
align with the treatment technologies to be implemented under USCG’s final rule, requirements to ensure that the ballast water
treatment systems are functioning correctly, and more stringent effluent limits for oil to sea interfaces and exhaust gas scrubber
wastewater. The VGP contains a compliance date schedule for these requirements. In December 2018 Congress enacted the Frank
LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018, which included the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”). VIDA reduces the
scope of the VGP and is expected to align state and local discharge standards with federal standards. Under VIDA, the EPA was
designated the government agency responsible for establishing national standards of performance for U.S. ballast water regulations,
and the USCG was assigned the responsibility for implementing, monitoring and enforcing those standards pursuant to regulations to
be developed. In September 2024, the EPA finalized the performance standards, giving the USCG two years to develop
implementation, compliance, and enforcement regulations. Once the USCG publishes corresponding implementing regulations under
VIDA (anticipated in 2026), the discharge of ballast water in the navigable waters of the United States will no longer be subject to the
VGP. In the meantime, the current VGP and regulations remain in effect.
Certain of the Company’s vessels are subject to more stringent numeric discharge limits under the EPA’s VGP, even though those
vessels have obtained a valid extension from the USCG for implementation of treatment technology under the final rule. The EPA has
determined that it will not issue extensions under the VGP, but in December 2013 it issued an Enforcement Response Policy (“ERP”)
to address this industry-wide issue. Under the ERP, the EPA states that vessels that have received an extension from the USCG, are in
compliance with all of the VGP’s requirements other than the numeric discharge limits and meet certain other requirements will be
entitled to a “low enforcement priority.” While INSW believes that any vessel that is or may become subject to the VGP’s numeric
discharge limits during the pendency of a USCG extension will be entitled to such low priority treatment under the ERP no assurance
can be given that they will do so.
The VGP system also permits individual states and territories to impose more stringent requirements for discharges into the navigable
waters of such state or territory. Certain individual states have enacted legislation or regulations addressing hull cleaning and ballast
water management. For example, California has adopted extensive requirements for more stringent effluent limits and discharge
monitoring and testing requirements with respect to discharges in its waters.
Following an assessment by the California State Lands Commission of the current technology for meeting ballast water management
standards, California extended the deadline for compliance with stringent interim standards to 2030 and the deadline for final “zero
detect” standards to 2040. In the interim, the California State Lands Commission incorporated the federal ballast water discharge
standards and implementation schedule into California law and established operational monitoring and recordkeeping requirements.
New York State has imposed a more stringent bilge water discharge requirement for vessels in its waters than what is required by the
VGP or IMO. Through its Section 401 Certification of the VGP, New York prohibits the discharge of all bilge water in its waters.
New York State also requires that vessels entering its waters from outside the Exclusive Economic Zone must perform ballast water
exchange in addition to treating it with a ballast water treatment system.
U.S. Air Emissions Standards
Pursuant to MARPOL Annex VI, EPA adopted regulations implementing the provisions of Annex VI, which regulations require
subject vessels to comply with the applicable Annex VI provisions when they enter U.S. ports or operate in most internal U.S. waters.
The Company’s vessels are currently Annex VI compliant. Accordingly, absent any new and onerous Annex VI implementing
regulations, the Company does not expect to incur material additional costs in order to comply with this convention.
The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 and 1990 (“CAA”), requires the EPA to
promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. INSW’s vessels are subject to
vapor control and recovery requirements for certain cargoes when loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning and conducting other
operations in regulated port areas. Each of the Company’s vessels operating in the transport of clean petroleum products in regulated
port areas where vapor control standards are required has been outfitted with a vapor recovery system that satisfies these requirements.
In addition, the EPA issued emissions standards for marine diesel engines. The EPA has implemented rules comparable to those of
Annex VI to increase the control of air pollutant emissions from certain large marine engines by requiring certain new marine-diesel
engines installed on U.S. registered ships to meet lower NOx standards were implemented in two phases. The newly built engine
standards that became effective in 2011 required more efficient use of current engine technologies, including engine timing, engine
cooling, and advanced computer controls to achieve a 15 to 25 percent NOx reduction below previous levels. More stringent long-
term standards for newly built engines that applied beginning in 2016 and required the use of high efficiency emission control
technology such as selective catalytic reduction to achieve NOx reductions 80 percent below the pre-2016 levels.
19
International Seaways, Inc.
Fuel used by all vessels operating in the North American ECA, encompassing the area extending 200 miles from the coastlines of the
Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts and the eight main Hawaiian Islands, and the United States Caribbean Sea ECA, encompassing water
around Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, cannot exceed 0.1% sulfur. The Company believes that its vessels are in compliance
with the current requirements of the ECAs. If other ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements
relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the EPA or the states where INSW
operates, compliance could require or affect the timing of significant capital and/or operating expenditures that could be material to
INSW’s consolidated financial statements.
The CAA also requires states to draft State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”), designed to attain national health-based air quality
standards in major metropolitan and industrial areas. Where states fail to present approvable SIPs, or SIP revisions by certain statutory
deadlines, the EPA is required to draft a Federal Implementation Plan. Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from barge loading
and degassing operations by requiring the installation of vapor control equipment. Where required, the Company’s vessels are already
equipped with vapor control systems that satisfy these requirements. Although a risk exists that new regulations could require
significant capital expenditures and otherwise increase its costs, the Company believes, based upon the regulations that have been
proposed to date, that no material capital expenditures beyond those currently contemplated and no material increase in costs are likely
to be required as a result of the SIPs program.
Individual states have been considering their own restrictions on air emissions from engines on vessels operating within state waters.
California requires certain ocean-going vessels operating within 24 nautical miles of the Californian coast to reduce air pollution by
using only low-sulfur marine distillate fuel rather than bunker fuel in auxiliary diesel and diesel-electric engines, main propulsion
diesel engines and auxiliary boilers. Vessels sailing within 24 miles of the California coastline whose itineraries call for them to enter
any California ports, terminal facilities, or internal or estuarine waters must use marine gas oil or marine diesel oil with a sulfur
content at or below 0.1% sulfur and does not allow compliance via scrubbers. The Company believes that its vessels that operate in
California waters are in compliance with these regulations.
Vessels calling at California ports (Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco and Hueneme) must turn
off auxiliary engines in port and connect the vessel to shoreside power, a process known as cold ironing. In August 2020, the
California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) announced expansion of its existing at-berth air emissions requirements. These changes
require all ocean-going vessel operators and terminal operators to report each visit made to any California marine terminal and will
require that ships at berths in California ports operate with either shoreside power or with CARB-approved emission controls on
auxiliary engines and boilers for the duration of the visit, unless the visit qualifies for an exception or an alternative compliance option
is used. Reporting requirements for all vessel types began in 2023. As of January 1, 2025, tanker vessels visiting terminals in the
Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are subject to the updated at-berth air emissions requirements. These updated requirements
become effective for all tanker vessels at other California ports in 2027.
Security Regulations and Practices
Security at sea has been a concern to governments, shipping lines, port authorities and importers and exporters for years. Since the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. In 2002, the U.S.
Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (“MTSA”) came into effect and the USCG issued regulations in 2003 implementing
certain portions of the MTSA by requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, effective in July 2004, a new subchapter of SOLAS imposes various detailed
security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the International Ship and Port Facilities Security
Code (the “ISPS Code”). The ISPS Code is applicable to all cargo vessels of 500 gross tons plus all passenger ships operating on
international voyages, mobile offshore drilling units, as well as port facilities that service them. The objective of the ISPS Code is to
establish the framework that allows detection of security threats and implementation of preventive measures against security incidents
that can affect ships or port facilities used in international trade. Among other things, the ISPS Code requires the development of
vessel security plans and compliance with flag state security certification requirements. To trade internationally, a vessel must attain
an International Ship Security Certificate (“ISSC”) from a recognized security organization approved by the vessel’s flag state.
The USCG regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt from MTSA vessel security measures
for non-U.S. vessels that have on board a valid ISSC attesting to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the
ISPS Code.
20
International Seaways, Inc.
All of INSW’s vessels have developed and implemented vessel security plans that have been approved by the appropriate regulatory
authorities, have obtained ISSCs and comply with applicable security requirements.
The Company monitors the waters in which its vessels operate for pirate activity. Company vessels that transit areas where there is a
high risk of pirate activity follow best management practices for reducing risk and preventing pirate attacks and are in compliance
with protocols established by the naval coalition protective forces operating in such areas.
INSPECTION BY CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES
Every oceangoing vessel must be “classed” by a Classification Society. The Classification Society certifies that the vessel is “in
class,” signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the Classification Society and complies
with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a
member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state,
the Classification Society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned. The
Classification Society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the
flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case and/or to the regulations of the country concerned.
For maintenance of the class certification, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any
special equipment classed are required to be performed as follows:
Annual Surveys. For seagoing ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery, including the electrical
plant and where applicable for special equipment classed, at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the
class period indicated in the certificate.
Intermediate Surveys. Extended annual surveys are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically are conducted two and
one-half years after commissioning and each class renewal. Intermediate surveys may be carried out between the occasions of
the second or third annual survey.
Class Renewal Surveys. Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out for the ship’s hull, machinery,
including the electrical plant, and for any special equipment classed, at the intervals indicated by the character of
classification for the hull. At the special survey the vessel is thoroughly examined, including ultrasonic measurements to
determine the thickness of the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the
Classification Society would prescribe steel renewals. The Classification Society may grant a one-year grace period for
completion of the special survey. Substantial amounts of money may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special
survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and tear. In lieu of the special survey every four or five years, depending on
whether a grace period was granted, a shipowner has the option of arranging with the Classification Society for the vessel’s
hull or machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, in which every part of the vessel would be surveyed within a five-year
cycle. Upon a shipowner’s request, the surveys required for class renewal may be split according to an agreed schedule to
extend over the entire period of class survey period. This process is referred to as continuous class renewal.
Vessels are required to dry dock for inspection of the underwater hull at each intermediate survey and at each class renewal survey.
For tankers less than 15 years old, Classification Societies permit for intermediate surveys in water inspections by divers in lieu of dry
docking, subject to other requirements of such Classification Societies.
If defects are found during any survey, the Classification Society surveyor will issue a “recommendation” which must be rectified by
the vessel owner within prescribed time limits.
Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as “in class” by a Classification
Society that is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies, or IACS. All our vessels are currently, and we
expect will continue to be, certified as being “in class” by a Classification Society that is a member of IACS. All new and secondhand
vessels that we acquire must be certified as being “in class” prior to their delivery under our standard purchase contracts and
memorandum of agreement. If the vessel is not certified on the date of closing, we have no obligation to take delivery of the vessel.
21
International Seaways, Inc.
INSURANCE
Consistent with the currently prevailing practice in the industry, the Company presently carries protection and indemnity (“P&I”)
insurance coverage for pollution of $1.0 billion per occurrence on every vessel in its fleet. P&I insurance is provided by mutual
protection and indemnity associations (“P&I Associations”). The P&I Associations that comprise the International Group insure
approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s
liabilities. Each P&I Association has capped its exposure to each of its members at approximately $8.9 billion. As a member of a P&I
Association that is a member of the International Group, the Company is subject to calls payable to the P&I Associations based on its
claim record as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual Associations of which it is a member, and the
members of the pool of P&I Associations comprising the International Group. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was a member
of three P&I Associations. Each of the Company’s vessels is insured by one of these three Associations with deductibles ranging from
$0.025 million to $0.1 million per vessel per incident. While the Company has historically been able to obtain pollution coverage at
commercially reasonable rates, no assurances can be given that such insurance will continue to be available in the future.
The Company carries marine hull and machinery and war risk (including piracy) insurance, which includes the risk of actual or
constructive total loss, for all of its vessels. The vessels are each covered up to at least their fair market value, with deductibles ranging
from $0.125 million to $0.250 million per vessel per incident. The Company is self-insured for hull and machinery claims in amounts
in excess of the individual vessel deductibles up to a maximum aggregate loss of $1.5 million per policy year for certain of its vessels.
The Company currently maintains loss of hire insurance to cover loss of charter income resulting from accidents or breakdowns of its
vessels, and the bareboat chartered vessels that are covered under the vessels’ marine hull and machinery insurance. Loss of hire
insurance covers up to 60 days lost charter income per vessel per incident in excess of the first 60 days lost for each covered incident,
which is borne by the Company.
INCOME TAXATION OF THE COMPANY
INSW is incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and pursuant to the laws of the Marshall Islands, the Company is not
subject to income tax in the Marshall Islands. All of the Company’s vessels are owned or operated by non-U.S. corporations that are
subsidiaries of INSW.
U.S. Income Tax
The following summary of the principal U.S. income tax laws applicable to the Company, as well as the conclusions regarding certain
issues of income tax law, are based on the provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), existing
and proposed U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative rulings, pronouncements and judicial decisions, all as of the date
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. No assurance can be given that changes in or interpretation of existing laws will not occur or
will not be retroactive or that anticipated future circumstances will in fact occur.
INSW derives substantially all of its gross income from the use and operation of vessels in international commerce. This income
principally consists of hire from time and voyage charters for the transportation of cargoes and the performance of services directly
related thereto, which is referred to herein as “shipping income.”
INSW’s vessels operate in various parts of the world, including to or from U.S. ports. Shipping income that is attributable to
transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States will be considered to be 50% derived
from sources within the United States. Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the U.S. will be
considered to be 100% derived from sources within the United States. INSW does not engage in transportation that gives rise to 100%
U.S. source income. Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be considered to be 100%
derived from sources outside the United States and will generally not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax.
In 2024 and prior years, INSW was exempt from taxation on its U.S. source shipping income under Section 883 of the Code and the
corresponding Treasury regulations. For 2025 and future years, INSW will need to evaluate its qualification for exemption under
Section 883 and there can be no assurance that INSW will continue to qualify for the exemption.
22
International Seaways, Inc.
Our qualification for the exemption under Section 883 is described in more detail under “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Legal and
Regulatory Matters — We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income, which would reduce our net
income and cash flows.” To the extent INSW is unable to qualify for exemption from tax under Section 883, INSW will be subject to
U.S. federal income taxation of 4% of its U.S. source shipping income on a gross basis without the benefit of deductions.
To the extent the Company (a) has, or is considered to have, a fixed place of business in the U.S. involved in the earning of U.S.
source shipping income, and (b) substantially all of the Company’s U.S. source shipping income is attributable to regularly scheduled
transportation, such as the operation of a vessel that follows a recurring schedule of voyages that begin or end in the U.S., the
Company’s U.S. source shipping income, together with other U.S. source income, is considered to be effectively connected
income. Currently, income effective connected with such a trade or business is subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax imposed
at a 21% rate and the Company may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax on such income. The Company does not have any
vessel with recurring voyages that begin or end in the U.S. on a regularly scheduled basis. Therefore, the Company believes that none
of its U.S. source shipping income constitute effectively connected income.
Global Minimum Tax
In December 2021, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) issued Model Rules for implementation
of a 15% minimum tax for multinational enterprises as part of its initiative intended to address the tax challenges arising from
globalization. A number of countries have adopted the OECD’s minimum tax rules and have implemented these rules or local versions
of these rules effective January 1, 2024. None of the Company’s subsidiaries are domiciled in such jurisdictions as of December 31,
2024. The application of the rules continues to evolve, and the adoption of these rules by countries in which subsidiaries of the
Company are domiciled may alter our tax obligations in certain jurisdictions in which we operate. We continue to evaluate the impact
of these rules and are currently evaluating a variety of mitigating actions to reduce the potential impact.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
This section highlights important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-
looking statements made in this report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time. If any of the circumstances or events
described below actually arise or occur, the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected. Actual dollar amounts are used in this Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section.
Summary of Risk Factors
The following is a summary of the risk factors you should be aware of before making a decision to invest in our common stock. This
summary does not address all the risks we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other
risks we face, can be found below in this risk factor section and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this
annual report on Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Industry
The highly cyclical nature of the industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates and vessel values, which could adversely
affect the Company’s earnings and available cash.
The market value of vessels fluctuates significantly, which could adversely affect INSW’s liquidity or otherwise adversely affect
its financial condition.
Declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause INSW to incur impairment charges.
Changes in the worldwide supply of vessels or an expansion of the capacity of newly-built vessels, without a commensurate shift
in demand for such vessels, may cause spot chart rates to increase or decline, affecting INSW’s revenues, profitability and cash
flows, and the value of its vessels.
Shipping is a business with inherent risks, and INSW’s insurance may not be adequate to cover its losses.
Counterparty credit risk and constraints on capital availability may adversely affect INSW’s business.
23
International Seaways, Inc.
The state of the global financial markets may adversely impact the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing on
acceptable terms and otherwise negatively impact the Company’s business.
INSW conducts its operations internationally, which subjects it to changing economic, political and governmental conditions
that may adversely affect its business.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels, terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability, including attacks against
merchant vessels in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by Iran–backed Houthi militants in Yemen, could adversely affect the
Company’s business.
The war between Russia and Ukraine could adversely affect INSW’s business.
Public health threats could adversely affect INSW’s business.
Risks Related to Our Company
INSW has incurred significant indebtedness which could affect its ability to finance its operations, pursue desirable business
opportunities and successfully run its business in the future, all of which could affect INSW’s ability to fulfill its obligations
under that indebtedness.
The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and could in the future breach
covenants in its credit facilities, term loans and certain vessel charters.
INSW is a holding company and depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute funds to it in order to satisfy its financial
obligations or pay dividends.
The Company will be required to make additional capital expenditures to expand the number of vessels in its fleet and to
maintain its vessels, which depend on additional financing.
The Company depends on third-party service providers for technical and commercial management of its fleet.
INSW’s business depends on voyage charters, and any future decrease in spot charter rates could adversely affect its earnings.
INSW may not be able to renew Time Charters when they expire or enter into new Time Charters.
Termination of, or a change in the nature of, INSW’s relationship with any of the commercial pools in which it participates
could adversely affect its business.
INSW may not realize the benefits it expects from past acquisitions or acquisitions or other strategic transactions it may make in
the future.
The smuggling or alleged smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto the Company’s vessels may lead to governmental claims
against the Company.
Operational costs and capital expenses will increase as the Company’s vessels age and may also increase due to unanticipated
events related to secondhand vessels and the consolidation of suppliers.
The Company is subject to credit risks with respect to its counterparties on contracts, and any failure by those counterparties to
meet their obligations could cause the Company to suffer losses on such contracts, decreasing revenues and earnings.
The Company may face unexpected drydock costs for its vessels.
Technological innovation could reduce the Company’s charter income and the value of the Company’s vessels.
The Company stores, processes, maintains, and transmits confidential information through information technology (“IT”)
systems. Cybersecurity issues, such as security breaches and computer viruses, affecting INSW’s IT systems and those of its
third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties, could disrupt INSW’s business, result in unintended disclosure or misuse of
confidential or proprietary information, damage its reputation, increase its costs, and cause losses.
INSW’s revenues are subject to seasonal variations.
Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
Climate change and greenhouse emissions may adversely affect our operating results.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our
sustainability and governance policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.
Compliance with complex laws, regulations, and, in particular, environmental laws or regulations, including those relating to the
emission of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), may adversely affect INSW’s business.
The employment of the Company’s vessels could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment
process.
24
International Seaways, Inc.
The Company’s vessels may be directed to call on ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the
United States (“U.S.”), the UN, the United Kingdom, or the EU, which could negatively affect the trading price of the
Company’s common shares.
The Company may be subject to litigation and government inquiries or investigations that, if not resolved in the Company’s
favor and not sufficiently covered by insurance, could have a material adverse effect on it.
Maritime claimants could arrest INSW’s vessels, which could interrupt cash flows.
Governments could requisition the Company’s vessels during a period of war or emergency, which may negatively impact the
Company’s business, financial condition, results of operation and available cash.
We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income, which could reduce our net income and cash
flows.
U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company”, which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences to U.S. shareholders.
Pending and future tax law changes may result in significant additional taxes to us.
Risks Related to the Common Stock
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which may have fewer rights and protections for shareholders than under a typical
jurisdiction in the United States.
It may be difficult to serve process on or enforce a United States judgment against us, our officers and our directors because we
are a foreign corporation.
The market price of the Company’s securities may fluctuate significantly.
Our Amended and Restated Rights Plan may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Company or changes to our
management and, therefore, depress the market price of our Common Stock.
Future offerings of debt or equity securities by the Company may materially adversely affect the share price, and future
capitalization measures could lead to substantial dilution of existing shareholders’ interests in the Company.
INSW may not continue to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock.
Risks Related to Our Industry
The highly cyclical nature of the industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates and vessel values, which could adversely
affect the Company’s earnings and available cash.
INSW depends on short duration, or “spot,” charters, for a significant portion of its revenues, which exposes INSW to fluctuations in
market conditions. In the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, INSW derived approximately 86%, 91% and 96%,
respectively, of its TCE revenues in the spot market. The tanker industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and
profitability. Fluctuations in charter rates and vessel values result from changes in supply and demand both for tanker capacity and for
oil and oil products. Factors affecting these changes in supply and demand are generally outside of the Company’s control. The nature,
timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are unpredictable and could adversely affect the values of the Company’s vessels
or result in significant fluctuations in the amount of charter revenues the Company earns, which could result in significant volatility in
INSW’s quarterly results and cash flows, and the Company’s ability to remain in compliance with financial covenants in its credit
facilities. See “—The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and could in the future
breach covenants in its credit facilities, term loans and certain vessel charters.” Furthermore, recent geopolitical instability and
weather conditions have significantly benefitted the Company’s financial results by increasing tanker demand in 2022 and 2023. This
increased demand remained at an elevated level in 2024. There can be no certainty as to when such geopolitical instability and
weather conditions will normalize, and any such normalization could cause tanker rates to decline significantly.
Factors influencing the demand for tanker capacity include:
supply and demand for, and availability of, energy resources such as oil, oil products and natural gas, which affect customers’
need for vessel capacity;
global and regional economic and political conditions, including armed conflicts, terrorist activities and strikes, that among
other things could impact the supply of oil, as well as trading patterns and the demand for various vessel types;
regional availability of refining capacity and inventories;
25
International Seaways, Inc.
changes in the production levels of crude oil (including in particular production by OPEC, the United States and other key
producers);
weather and natural disasters, including the continuing drought in Panama, reducing water levels in the Panama Canal and
thereby decreasing the daily number of vessels permitted to transit the canal, resulting in delays in crossing the canal or
extending their voyages by going around Cape Horn;
international sanctions, embargoes, import and export restrictions or nationalizations and wars, including the current Russia –
Ukraine war and attacks by Iran – backed Houthi militants based in Yemen;
developments in international trade generally;
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in the distances that cargoes are transported,
changes in the price of crude oil and changes to the West Texas Intermediate and Brent Crude Oil pricing benchmarks;
environmental and other legal and regulatory developments and concerns;
government subsidies of shipbuilding;
construction or expansion of new or existing pipelines or railways; and
competition from alternative sources of energy.
Factors influencing the supply of vessel capacity include:
the number of newbuilding deliveries;
the recycling rate of older vessels;
environmental and maritime regulations;
the number of vessels being used for storage or as FSO service vessels;
the number of vessels that are removed from service;
changes in the number of vessels ceasing to comply with sanctions imposed by the U.S., the UK and the EU, which changes
either decrease or increase the number of vessels that participate in sanctions compliant trading;
availability and pricing of other energy sources for which tankers can be used or to which construction capacity may be
dedicated; and
port or canal congestion and weather delays.
Many of the factors that influence the demand for tanker capacity will also, in the longer term, effectively influence the supply of
tanker capacity, since decisions to build new capacity, invest in capital repairs, or to retain in service older obsolescent capacity are
influenced by the general state of the marine transportation industry from time to time. If the number of new ships of a particular class
delivered exceeds the number of vessels of that class being recycled, available capacity in that class will increase. The newbuilding
order book of all classes of tankers (representing vessels in various stages of planning or construction that will be delivered in the
future) equaled approximately 14%, 7% and 4% as of each of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
The market value of vessels fluctuates significantly, which could adversely affect INSW’s liquidity or otherwise adversely affect its
financial condition.
The market value of vessels has fluctuated over time. The fluctuation in market value of vessels over time is based upon various
factors, including:
age of the vessel;
general economic and market conditions affecting the tanker industry, including the availability of vessel financing;
number of vessels in the world fleet;
types and sizes of vessels available;
changes in trading patterns affecting demand for particular sizes and types of vessels;
cost of newbuildings;
prevailing level of charter rates;
environmental and maritime regulations;
competition from other shipping companies and from other modes of transportation;
technological advances in vessel design and propulsion and overall vessel efficiency; and
ability to utilize less expensive fuels.
26
International Seaways, Inc.
During the second half of 2024, tanker values decreased, primarily because of lower TCE rates (resulting in part from reduced demand
for oil transported on sanction compliant vessels, in particular reduced demand from China). If INSW sells a vessel at a sale price that
is less than the vessel’s carrying amount on the Company’s financial statements, INSW will incur a loss on the sale and a reduction in
earnings and surplus. Declines in the values of the Company’s vessels could adversely affect the Company’s compliance with its loan
covenants.
Declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause INSW to incur impairment charges.
The Company evaluates events and changes in circumstances that have occurred to determine whether they indicate that the carrying
amounts of the vessel assets might not be recoverable. This review for potential impairment indicators and projection of future cash
flows related to the vessels is complex and requires the Company to make various estimates, including with respect to future freight
rates, earnings from the vessels, market appraisals and discount rates. All of these items have historically been volatile. The Company
evaluates the recoverable amount of a vessel asset as the sum of its undiscounted estimated future cash flows. If the recoverable
amount is less than the vessel’s carrying amount, the vessel’s carrying amount is then compared to its estimated fair value. If the
vessel’s carrying amount is less than its fair value, it is deemed impaired. The carrying values of the Company’s vessels may differ
significantly from their fair market value. The Company recorded a vessel impairment charge of $8.7 million during 2024.
Changes in the worldwide supply of vessels or an expansion of the capacity of newly-built tankers, without a commensurate shift in
demand for such vessels, may cause spot charter rates to increase or decline, affecting INSW’s revenues, profitability and cash
flows, and the value of its vessels.
Changes in vessel supply have historically been a driver of both spot market rates and the overall cyclicality of the maritime industry.
When the number of new ships of a particular class delivered exceeds the number of vessels of that class being recycled over a period,
available capacity in that class increases. Although vessel recycling levels over any particular period will depend on various factors,
including charter rates and recycling prices, the newbuilding order book (i.e., vessels in various stages of planning or construction that
will be delivered in the future) represented approximately 14% and 7% of the existing world tanker fleet as of each of December 31,
2024 and 2023. In addition, if newly built tankers have more capacity than the tankers being recycled or otherwise removed from the
active world fleet, overall tanker capacity will expand. Supply is also affected by the number of tankers being used for floating storage
(which are thus not available to transport crude oil or petroleum products). Although currently only a relatively small percentage of
the world tanker fleet is being used for storage at sea, that percentage varies over time, and is affected by expectations of changes in
the price of oil and petroleum products, with vessel use generally increasing when prices are expected to increase more than storage
costs and generally decreasing when they are not. Any of these factors may cause both spot charter rates and the value of the INSW’s
vessels to fluctuate, and may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and financial condition.
Shipping is a business with inherent risks, and INSW’s insurance may not be adequate to cover its losses.
INSW’s vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost and its vessel crews and shoreside employees are at risk of
injury or death because of events including, but not limited to:
marine disasters;
bad weather;
mechanical failures;
human error;
war, terrorism and piracy;
grounding, fire, explosions and collisions; and
other unforeseen circumstances or events.
These hazards may result in death or injury to persons; loss of revenues or property; demand for the payment of ransoms;
environmental damage; higher insurance rates; damage to INSW’s customer relationships; and market disruptions, delay or rerouting,
any or all of which may also subject INSW to litigation. In addition, transporting crude oil and refined petroleum products creates a
risk of business interruptions due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities, labor strikes, port closings and boycotts.
The operation of tankers also has unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil. An oil spill may cause significant
environmental damage and the associated costs could exceed the insurance coverage available to the Company. Compared to other
types of vessels, tankers are also exposed to a higher risk of damage and loss by fire, whether ignited by a terrorist attack, collision, or
other cause, due to the high flammability of the oil transported in tankers. Furthermore, any such incident could seriously damage
27
International Seaways, Inc.
INSW’s reputation and cause INSW either to lose business or to be less likely to be able to enter into new business (either because of
customer concerns or changes in customer vetting processes). Any of these events could result in loss of revenues, decreased cash
flows and increased costs.
While the Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks involved in the conduct of its business, risks may arise against
which the Company is not adequately insured. For example, a catastrophic spill could exceed INSW’s $1.0 billion per vessel insurance
coverage and have a material adverse effect on its operations. In addition, INSW may not be able to procure adequate insurance
coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future, and INSW cannot guarantee that any particular claim will be paid by its
insurers. In the past, new and stricter environmental regulations have led to higher costs for insurance covering environmental damage
or pollution, and new regulations could lead to similar increases or even make this type of insurance unavailable. Furthermore, even if
insurance coverage is adequate to cover the Company’s losses, INSW may not be able to timely obtain a replacement ship or may
suffer other consequential harm or difficulty in the event of a loss. INSW may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based
not only on its own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through
which INSW obtains insurance coverage for tort liability. INSW’s payment of these calls could result in significant expenses which
would reduce its profits and cash flows or cause losses.
Counterparty credit risk and constraints on capital availability may adversely affect INSW’s business.
Certain of the Company’s customers, financial lenders and suppliers may suffer material adverse impacts on their financial condition
that could make them unable or unwilling to comply with their contractual commitments, including the refusal or inability to pay
charter hire to INSW or an inability or unwillingness to lend funds. While INSW seeks to monitor the financial condition of its
customers, financial lenders and suppliers, the availability and accuracy of information about the financial condition of such entities
and the actions that INSW may take to reduce possible losses resulting from the failure of such entities to comply with their
contractual obligations is limited. Any such failure could have a material adverse effect on INSW’s revenues, profitability and cash
flows.
The Company also faces other potential constraints on capital relating to counterparty credit risk and constraints on INSW’s ability to
borrow funds. See also “— Risks Related to Our Company — The Company is subject to credit risks with respect to its counterparties
on contracts, and any failure by those counterparties to meet their obligations could cause the Company to suffer losses on such
contracts, decreasing revenues and earnings” and “— Risks Related to Our Company — INSW has incurred significant indebtedness
which could affect its ability to finance its operations, pursue desirable business opportunities and successfully run its business in the
future, all of which could affect INSW’s ability to fulfill its obligations under that indebtedness.”
The state of the global financial markets may adversely impact the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable
terms and otherwise negatively impact the Company’s business.
Global financial markets have been, and continue to be, volatile. There have been periods where there was a general decline in the
willingness of banks and other financial institutions to extend credit, particularly in the shipping industry, due to regulatory pressures
(e.g., Basel IV) and the historically volatile asset values of vessels, exacerbated by individual companies’ exposure to the spot market
(i.e., without fixed or locked in time charter coverage). As the shipping industry is highly dependent on the availability of credit to
finance and expand operations, it may be negatively affected by any such decline.
Also, concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically may increase the cost
of obtaining money from the credit markets. Lenders may also enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt at all
or on terms similar to current debt and reduce, and in some cases cease to provide funding to borrowers. Due to these factors,
additional financing may not be available if needed and to the extent required, on acceptable terms or at all. If additional financing is
not available when current facilities mature, or is available only on unfavorable terms, the Company may be unable to meet its
obligations as they come due or the Company may be unable to execute its business strategy, complete additional vessel acquisitions,
or otherwise take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise.
28
International Seaways, Inc.
INSW conducts its operations internationally, which subjects it to changing economic, political and governmental conditions that
may adversely affect its business.
The Company conducts its operations internationally, and its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be
adversely affected by changing economic, political and government conditions in the countries and regions where its vessels are
employed, including:
regional or local economic downturns;
changes in governmental policy or regulation;
restrictions on the transfer of funds into or out of countries in which INSW or its customers operate;
difficulty in staffing and managing (including ensuring compliance with internal policies and controls) geographically
widespread operations;
trade relations with foreign countries in which INSW’s customers and suppliers have operations, including protectionist
measures such as tariffs and import or export licensing requirements;
general economic and political conditions, which may interfere with, among other things, the Company’s supply chain, its
customers and all of INSW’s activities in a particular location;
difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations in non-U.S. jurisdictions and the collection of accounts receivable from foreign
accounts;
different regulatory regimes in the various countries in which INSW operates;
inadequate intellectual property protection in foreign countries;
the difficulties and increased expenses in complying with multiple and potentially conflicting U.S. and foreign laws,
regulations, security rules, product approvals and trade standards, anti-bribery laws, government sanctions and restrictions on
doing business with certain nations or specially designated nationals;
import and export duties and quotas;
demands for improper payments from port officials or other government officials;
U.S. and foreign customs, tariffs and taxes;
currency exchange controls, restrictions and fluctuations, which could result in reduced revenue and increased operating
expense;
international incidents;
transportation delays or interruptions;
local conflicts, acts of war, terrorist attacks or military conflicts;
changes in oil prices or disruptions in oil supplies that could substantially affect global trade, the Company’s customers’
operations and the Company’s business;
the imposition of taxes by flag states, port states and jurisdictions in which INSW or its subsidiaries are incorporated or
where its vessels operate; and
expropriation of INSW’s vessels.
The occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
Additionally, protectionist developments, or the perception they may occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic
conditions, and may significantly reduce global trade. Governments may turn to trade barriers to protect their domestic industries
against foreign imports, thereby depressing shipping demand. In particular, leaders in the United States have indicated the United
States may seek to implement more protective trade measures and to withdraw from certain international trade treaties, including with
China. Increasing trade protectionism may cause an increase in the cost of goods exported from regions globally, particularly the Asia-
Pacific region and the risks associated with exporting goods, which may significantly affect the quantity of goods to be shipped,
shipping time schedules, voyage costs and other associated costs. Further, increased tensions may adversely affect oil demand, which
would have an adverse effect on shipping rates.
INSW must comply with complex U.S. and non-U.S. laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K.
Bribery Act and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials; anti-money laundering laws; and competition
regulations. Moreover, the shipping industry is generally considered to present elevated risks in these areas.
29
International Seaways, Inc.
Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions, restrictions on the Company’s business
operations and on the Company’s ability to transport cargo to one or more countries, and could also materially affect the Company’s
brand, ability to attract and retain employees, international operations, business and operating results. Although INSW has policies
and procedures designed to achieve compliance with these laws and regulations, INSW cannot be certain that its employees,
contractors, joint venture partners or agents will not violate these policies and procedures. INSW’s operations may also subject its
employees and agents to extortion attempts.
Changes in fuel prices may adversely affect profits.
Fuel is a significant expense in the Company’s shipping operations when vessels are under voyage charter. Accordingly, an increase in
the price of fuel may adversely affect the Company’s profitability if these increases cannot be passed onto customers. The price and
supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside the Company’s control, including geopolitical developments;
supply and demand for oil and gas; actions by OPEC, and other oil and gas producers; war and unrest in oil producing countries and
regions; regional production patterns; and environmental concerns and regulations, including requirements to use certain fuels that are
more costly.
Terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability can affect the tanker industry, which could adversely affect INSW’s
business.
Terrorist attacks, the outbreak of war, or the existence of international hostilities could damage the world economy, adversely affect
the availability of and demand for crude oil and petroleum products and adversely affect both the Company’s ability to charter its
vessels and the charter rates payable under any such charters. In addition, INSW operates in a sector of the economy that is likely to
be adversely impacted by the effect of political instability, terrorist or other attacks, war or international hostilities. Political instability
has also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the
Arabian Gulf region, in the Black Sea in connection with the war between Russia and Ukraine and in the Red Sea and the Gulf of
Aden in connection with the Israel/Gaza conflict resulting from attacks by Iran-backed Houthi militants based in Yemen, respectively.
These factors could also increase the costs to the Company of conducting its business, particularly crew, insurance and security costs,
and prevent or restrict the Company from obtaining insurance coverage, all of which have a material adverse effect on INSW’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2019, Iran publicly threatened that it would interrupt the flow of oil through the Straits of Hormuz, the entrance to the
Arabian Gulf. Commencing in May 2019, several vessels in the Arabian Gulf have been attacked, which attacks the United States has
attributed to Iranian forces, and at least two vessels have been seized by Iran. Further the war between Russia and Ukraine and the
Israel/Gaza conflict have resulted in attacks on commercial vessels in the Black Sea, Red Sea and Gulf of Aden in the 2022 – 2025
period. None of these attacks or seizures have involved the Company’s vessels. To date, these attacks and vessel seizures, while
increasing the costs of the Company conducting its business to a limited extent, have not had a material adverse effect on INSW’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow but no assurance can be given that continued vessel attacks or
seizures will not do so.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect the Company’s business.
The threat of pirate attacks on seagoing vessels remains, particularly off the west coast of Africa and in the South China Sea. If piracy
attacks result in regions in which the Company’s vessels are deployed being characterized by insurers as “war risk” zones, as the Gulf
of Aden has been, or Joint War Committee “war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for insurance coverage could increase
significantly, and such insurance coverage may become difficult to obtain. Crew costs could also increase in such circumstances due
to risks of piracy attacks.
In addition, while INSW believes the charterer remains liable for charter payments when a vessel is seized by pirates, the charterer
may dispute this and withhold charter hire until the vessel is released. A charterer may also claim that a vessel seized by pirates was
not “on-hire” for a certain number of days and it is therefore entitled to cancel the charter party, a claim the Company would dispute.
The Company may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company. In addition, hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against the Company’s vessels, or an increase in the cost (or
unavailability) of insurance for those vessels, could have a material adverse impact on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. Such attacks may also impact the Company’s customers, which could impair their ability to make
payments to the Company under their charters.
30
International Seaways, Inc.
Public health threats could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations and financial results.
Public health threats and other highly communicable diseases, outbreaks of which have already occurred in various parts of the world
near where INSW operates, could adversely impact the Company’s operations, the operations of the Company’s customers and the
global economy, including the worldwide demand for crude oil and the level of demand for INSW’s services. Any quarantine of
personnel, restrictions on travel to or from countries in which INSW operates, or inability to access certain areas could adversely
affect the Company’s operations. Travel restrictions, operational problems or large-scale social unrest in any part of the world in
which INSW operates, or any reduction in the demand for tanker services caused by public health threats in the future, may impact
INSW’s operations and adversely affect the Company’s financial results.
Risks Related to Our Company
INSW has incurred significant indebtedness which could affect its ability to finance its operations, pursue desirable business
opportunities and successfully run its business in the future, all of which could affect INSW’s ability to fulfill its obligations under
that indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2024, INSW had approximately $688 million of outstanding indebtedness (including finance lease obligations),
net of discounts and deferred finance costs. INSW’s substantial indebtedness and interest expense could have important consequences,
including:
limiting INSW’s ability to use a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations in other areas of its business, including
for working capital, capital expenditures and other general business activities, because INSW must dedicate a substantial
portion of these funds to service its debt;
to the extent INSW’s future cash flows are insufficient, requiring the Company to seek to incur additional indebtedness in
order to make planned capital expenditures and other expenses or investments;
limiting INSW’s ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service
requirements, acquisitions, and other expenses or investments planned by the Company;
limiting the Company’s flexibility and ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures and
adverse changes in government regulation, and INSW’s business and industry;
limiting INSW’s ability to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness; and
increasing INSW’s vulnerability to a downturn in its business and to adverse economic and industry conditions generally.
INSW’s ability to continue to fund its obligations and to reduce or refinance debt in the future may be affected by, among other things,
the age of the Company’s fleet and general economic, financial market, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors. An inability to
fund the Company’s debt requirements or reduce or refinance debt in the future could have a material adverse effect on INSW’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, for certain lease transactions, including finance leases, the
Company’s ability to prepay the lease is restricted so the lease obligations may remain outstanding throughout the lease term even if it
is financially advantageous for the Company to prepay the lease.
Additionally, the actual or perceived credit quality of the Company’s or its pools’ charterers (as well as any defaults by them) could
materially affect the Company’s ability to obtain the additional capital resources that it will require to purchase additional vessels or
significantly increase the costs of obtaining such capital. The Company’s inability to obtain additional financing at an acceptable cost,
or at all, could materially affect the Company’s results of operation and its ability to implement its business strategy.
The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and could in the future breach
covenants in its credit facilities, term loans, and certain vessel charters.
The Company’s earnings, cash flow and the market value of its vessels vary significantly over time due to the cyclical nature of the
tanker industry, as well as general economic and market conditions affecting the industry. As a result, the amount of debt that INSW
can manage in some periods may not be appropriate in other periods and its ability to meet the financial covenants to which it is
subject or may be subject in the future may vary. Additionally, future cash flow may be insufficient to meet the Company’s debt
obligations and commitments. Any insufficiency could negatively impact INSW’s business.
31
International Seaways, Inc.
The Company’s $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility and $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility contain customary
representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants including financial covenants that require the Company (i) to maintain a
minimum liquidity level of the greater of $50 million and 5% of the Company’s Consolidated Indebtedness; (ii) to ensure the
Company’s and its consolidated subsidiaries’ Maximum Leverage Ratio will not exceed 0.60 to 1.00 at any time; (iii) to ensure that
Current Assets exceeds Current Liabilities (which is defined to exclude the current potion of Consolidated Indebtedness); and (iv) to
ensure the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Collateral Vessels under each facility will not be less than 135% of the aggregate
outstanding principal amount of each facility. Certain of the Company’s lease financing arrangements also contain similar financial
covenants.
While the Company is in compliance with all of its loan covenants, a decrease in vessel values or a failure to meet collateral
maintenance requirements could cause the Company to breach certain covenants in its existing credit facilities, term loans and vessel
leases, or in future financing agreements that the Company may enter into from time to time. If the Company breaches such covenants
and is unable to remedy the relevant breach or obtain a waiver, the Company’s lenders could accelerate its debt and lenders could
foreclose on the Company’s owned vessels and the owners of certain vessels that the Company charters in could terminate such
charters.
A range of economic, competitive, financial, business, industry and other factors will affect future financial performance, and,
accordingly, the Company’s ability to generate cash flow from operations and to pay debt and to meet the financial covenants under
the Company’s debt facilities. Many of these factors, such as charter rates, economic and financial conditions in the tanker industry
and the global economy or competitive initiatives of competitors, are beyond the Company’s control. If INSW does not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, it may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as:
refinancing or restructuring its debt;
selling tankers or other assets;
reducing or delaying investments and capital expenditures; or
seeking to raise additional capital.
Undertaking alternative financing plans, if necessary, might not allow INSW to meet its debt obligations. The Company’s ability to
restructure or refinance its debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets, its access to such markets and its financial
condition at that time. Any refinancing of debt could be at higher interest rates and might require the Company to comply with more
onerous covenants, which could further restrict INSW’s business operations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt
instruments may restrict INSW from adopting some alternative measures. These alternative measures may not be successful and may
not permit INSW to meet its scheduled debt service obligations. The Company’s inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its
debt obligations, to meet the covenants of its credit agreements and term loans and/or to obtain alternative financing in such
circumstances, could materially and adversely affect INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
INSW is a holding company and depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute funds to it in order to satisfy its financial
obligation or pay dividends.
International Seaways, Inc. is a holding company, and its subsidiaries conduct all of its operations and own all of its operating assets.
It has no significant assets other than the equity interests in its subsidiaries. As a result, its ability to satisfy its financial obligations or
pay dividends depends on its subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to it. In addition, the terms of certain of the Company’s
financing agreements restrict the ability of certain of those subsidiaries to distribute funds to International Seaways, Inc.
The Company will be required to make additional capital expenditures to expand the number of vessels in its fleet and to maintain
all of its vessels, which depend on additional financing.
The Company’s business strategy is based in part upon the expansion of its fleet through the purchase of additional vessels at
attractive points in the tanker cycle. The Company currently has newbuilding construction contracts for the purchase of six dual fuel
LNG ready LR1s which provide for installment payments of the purchase price to be made by the Company as the vessels are being
built. If the Company is unable to fulfil its obligations under such contracts, the shipyard constructing such vessels may be permitted
to terminate such contracts and the Company may be required to forfeit all or a portion of the down payments it made under such
contracts and it may also be sued for any outstanding balance. In addition, as a vessel must be drydocked within five years of its
delivery from a shipyard, with survey cycles of no more than 60 months for the first three surveys, and 30 months thereafter, not
including any unexpected repairs, the Company will incur significant maintenance costs for its existing and any newly-acquired
32
International Seaways, Inc.
vessels. As a result, if the Company does not utilize its vessels as planned, these maintenance costs could have material adverse effects
on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company depends on third-party service providers for technical and commercial management of its fleet.
The Company currently outsources to third-party service providers certain management services of its fleet, including technical
management, certain aspects of commercial management and crew management. In particular, the Company has entered into ship
management agreements that assign technical management responsibilities to a third-party technical manager for each conventional
tanker in the Company’s fleet (collectively, the “Ship Management Agreements”). The Company has also transferred commercial
management of much of its fleet to certain other third-party service providers, principally commercial pools.
In such outsourcing arrangements, the Company has transferred direct control over technical and commercial management of the
relevant vessels, while maintaining significant oversight and audit rights, and must rely on third-party service providers to, among
other things:
comply with contractual commitments to the Company, including with respect to safety, quality and environmental
compliance of the operations of the Company’s vessels;
comply with requirements imposed by the U.S., the U.N., the U.K. and the EU (i) restricting calls on ports located in
countries that are subject to sanctions and embargoes and (ii) prohibiting bribery and other corrupt practices;
respond to changes in customer demands for the Company’s vessels;
obtain supplies and materials necessary for the operation and maintenance of the Company’s vessels; and
mitigate the impact of labor shortages and/or disruptions relating to crews on the Company’s vessels.
The failure of third-party service providers to meet such commitments could lead to legal liability or other damages to the Company.
The third-party service providers the Company has selected may not provide a standard of service comparable to that the Company
would provide for such vessels if the Company directly provided such service. The Company relies on its third-party service providers
to comply with applicable law, and a failure by such providers to comply with such laws may subject the Company to liability or
damage its reputation even if the Company did not engage in the conduct itself. Furthermore, damage to any such third party service
provider’s reputation, relationships or business may reflect on the Company directly or indirectly, and could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s reputation and business.
The third-party technical managers have the right to terminate the Ship Management Agreements at any time with 90 days’ notice. If a
third-party technical manager exercises that right, the Company will be required either to enter into substitute agreements with other
third parties or to assume those management duties. The Company may not succeed in negotiating and entering into such agreements
with other third parties and, even if it does so, the terms and conditions of such agreements may be less favorable to the Company.
Furthermore, if the Company is required to dedicate internal resources to managing its fleet (including, but not limited to, hiring
additional qualified personnel or diverting existing resources), that could result in increased costs and reduced efficiency and
profitability. Any such changes could result in a temporary loss of customer approvals, could disrupt the Company’s business and
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
INSW’s business depends on voyage charters, and any future decrease in spot charter rates could adversely affect its earnings.
Voyage charters, including vessels operating in commercial pools that predominantly operate in the spot market, constituted 86% of
INSW’s aggregate TCE revenues in the year ended December 31, 2024, 91% in 2023 and 96% in 2022. Accordingly, INSW’s
shipping revenues are significantly affected by prevailing spot rates for voyage charters in the markets in which the Company’s
vessels operate. The spot charter market may fluctuate significantly from time to time based upon tanker and oil supply and demand.
The spot market is very volatile, and, in the past, there have been periods when spot charter rates have declined below the operating
cost of vessels. The successful operation of INSW’s vessels in the competitive spot charter market depends on, among other things,
obtaining profitable spot charters and minimizing, to the extent possible, time spent waiting for charters and time spent traveling
unladen to pick up cargo. If spot charter rates decline in the future, then INSW may be unable to operate its vessels trading in the spot
market profitably, or meet its other obligations, including payments on indebtedness. Furthermore, as charter rates for spot charters are
fixed for a single voyage, which may last up to several weeks during periods in which spot charter rates are rising or falling, INSW
will generally experience delays in realizing the benefits from or experiencing the detriments of those changes. See also Item 1,
“Business — Fleet Operations — Commercial Management.”
33
International Seaways, Inc.
INSW may not be able to renew Time Charters when they expire or enter into new Time Charters.
INSW’s ability to renew expiring contracts or obtain new charters will depend on the prevailing market conditions at the time of
renewal. As of December 31, 2024, INSW employed 14 of its vessels on time charters, with expiration dates ranging between
February 2025 and April 2030. The Company’s existing time charters may not be renewed at comparable rates or if renewed or
entered into, those new contracts may be at less favorable rates. In addition, there may be a gap in employment of vessels between
current charters and subsequent charters. If, upon expiration of the existing time charters, INSW is unable to obtain time charters or
voyage charters at desirable rates, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely
affected.
Termination of, or a change in the nature of, INSW’s relationship with any of the commercial pools in which it participates could
adversely affect its business.
As of December 31, 2024, nine of the Company’s 13 VLCCs participate in the TI pool; 12 of its 13 Suezmaxes participate in the
Maersk Tankers pool; three of the Company’s four Aframaxes participate in the Aframax International pool; all eight of its LR1s
participate in the PI pool; and 30 of the 39 MRs participate in the CPTA pool or NTP pool. INSW’s participation in these pools is
intended to enhance the financial performance of the Company’s vessels through higher vessel utilization. Any participant in any of
these pools has the right to withdraw upon notice in accordance with the relevant pool agreement. Changes in the management of, and
the terms of, these pools (including as a result of changes adopted in conjunction with the implementation of the EU Emission Trading
System), decreases in the number of vessels participating in these pools, or the termination of these pools, could result in increased
costs and reduced efficiency and profitability for the Company.
In addition, in recent years the EU has published guidelines on the application of the EU antitrust rules to traditional agreements for
maritime services such as commercial pools. While the Company believes that all the commercial pools it participates in comply with
EU rules, there has been limited administrative and judicial interpretation of the rules. Restrictive interpretations of the guidelines
could adversely affect the ability to commercially market the respective types of vessels in commercial pools.
In the highly competitive international market, INSW may not be able to compete effectively for charters.
The Company’s vessels are employed in a highly competitive market. Competition arises from other vessel owners, including major
oil companies, which may have substantially greater resources than INSW. Competition for the transportation of crude oil and other
petroleum products depends on price, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of the vessel operator to the charterer. The
Company believes that because ownership of the world tanker fleet is highly fragmented, no single vessel owner is able to influence
charter rates.
INSW may not realize the benefits it expects from past acquisitions or acquisitions or other strategic transactions it may make in
the future.
From time to time, INSW considers, and may make, acquisitions of individual vessels, groups of vessels, or shipping businesses. The
success of any such acquisition will depend upon a number of factors, some of which may not be within its control. These factors
include INSW’s ability to:
identify suitable tankers and/or shipping companies for acquisitions at attractive prices, which may not be possible if asset
prices rise too quickly;
obtain financing;
integrate any acquired tankers or businesses successfully with INSW’s then-existing operations; and
enhance INSW’s customer base.
INSW intends to finance these acquisitions by using available cash from operations and through incurrence of debt, other financing
sources or bridge financing, any of which may increase its leverage ratios, or by issuing equity, which may have a dilutive impact on
its existing shareholders. At any given time INSW may be engaged in a number of discussions that may result in one or more
acquisitions, some of which may be material to INSW as a whole. These opportunities require confidentiality and may involve
negotiations that require quick responses by INSW. Although there can be no certainty that any of these discussions will result in
definitive agreements or the completion of any transactions, the announcement of any such transaction may lead to increased volatility
in the trading price of INSW’s securities.
34
International Seaways, Inc.
Acquisitions and other transactions can also involve a number of special risks and challenges, including:
diversion of management time and attention from the Company’s existing business and other business opportunities;
delays in closing or the inability to close an acquisition for any reason, including third-party consents or approvals;
any unanticipated negative impact on the Company of disclosed or undisclosed matters relating to any vessels or operations
acquired; and
assumption of debt or other liabilities of the acquired business, including litigation related to the acquired business.
The success of acquisitions or strategic investments depends on the effective integration of newly acquired businesses or assets into
INSW’s current operations. Such integration is subject to risks and uncertainties, including realization of anticipated synergies and
cost savings, the ability to retain and attract personnel and clients, the diversion of management’s attention from other business
concerns, and undisclosed or potential legal liabilities of the acquired company or asset. INSW may not realize the strategic and
financial benefits that it expects from any of its past acquisitions, or any future acquisitions. Further, if a portion of the purchase price
of a business is attributable to goodwill and if the acquired business does not perform up to expectations at the time of the acquisition,
some or all of the goodwill may be written off, adversely affecting INSW’s earnings.
The smuggling or alleged smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto the Company’s vessels may lead to governmental claims
against the Company.
The Company expects that its vessels will call in ports where smugglers may attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels,
with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent the Company’s vessels are found with or accused to be carrying
contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessels and whether with or without the knowledge of any of its crew, the
Company may face governmental or other regulatory claims which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, such events could have ancillary consequences under INSW’s financing
and other agreements.
Operating costs and capital expenses will increase as the Company’s vessels age and may also increase due to unanticipated events
relating to secondhand vessels and the consolidation of suppliers.
In general, capital expenditures and other costs necessary for maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increase as the age of
the vessel increases. As of December 31, 2024, the weighted average age of the Company’s total owned and operated fleet was 11.0
years (which excludes the six dual fuel LNG ready LR1s under construction and contracted for delivery to the Company during the
third quarter of 2025 through the third quarter of 2026). In addition, older vessels are typically less fuel-efficient than more recently
constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Accordingly, it is likely that the operating costs of INSW’s currently
operated vessels will rise as the age of the Company’s fleet increases. In addition, changes in governmental regulations and
compliance with Classification Society standards may restrict the type of activities in which the vessels may engage and/or may
require INSW to make additional expenditures for new equipment. Every commercial tanker must pass inspection by a Classification
Society authorized by the vessel’s country of registry. The Classification Society certifies that a tanker is safe and seaworthy in
accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the tanker and the international conventions of which
that country is a member. If a Classification Society requires the Company to add equipment, INSW may be required to incur
substantial costs or take its vessels out of service. Market conditions may not justify such expenditures or permit INSW to operate its
older vessels profitably even if those vessels remain operational. If a vessel in INSW’s fleet does not maintain its class and/or fails any
survey, it will be unemployable and unable to trade between ports until its class is restored or such failure is remedied. This would
negatively impact the Company’s results of operation.
In addition, the Company’s fleet includes a number of vessels purchased in the secondhand market or otherwise acquired after they
have been constructed, such as through the Merger. While the Company typically inspects secondhand vessels before it purchases or
otherwise acquires them, those inspections do not necessarily provide INSW with the same level of knowledge about those vessels’
condition that INSW would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by it. The Company may not
discover defects or other problems with such vessels before purchase, which may lead to expensive, unanticipated repairs, and could
even result in accidents or other incidents for which the Company could be liable.
Furthermore, recent mergers have reduced the number of available suppliers, resulting in fewer alternatives for sourcing key supplies.
With respect to certain items, INSW is generally dependent upon the original equipment manufacturer for repair and replacement of
the item or its spare parts. Supplier consolidation may result in a shortage of supplies and services, thereby increasing the cost of
supplies or potentially inhibiting the ability of suppliers to deliver on time.
35
International Seaways, Inc.
These cost increases or delays could result in downtime, and delays in the repair and maintenance of the Company’s vessels and have
a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s lightering business faces significant competition and market volatility, and revenues and profitability for these
operations may vary significantly from period to period.
The Company provides STS transfer services, primarily in the crude oil and refined petroleum products industries. The seaborne
markets for STS transfer business are highly competitive and our competitors may in some cases have greater resources than we
do. The business also faces competition from alternative methods of delivering crude oil and refined petroleum products shipments to
ports and vessels, including several offshore loading and offloading facilities either in operation or in various stages of planning in the
USG region. Furthermore, the market for STS transfer services faces different competitive dynamics than our other tanker
businesses, meaning that our expertise in the tanker markets may not apply in the same ways to our lightering business, and demand
for lightering services has historically varied significantly from period to period based on customer activity in the regions in which we
operate. Accordingly, our ability to maintain or grow our market share in STS transfer services may be limited, and the Company’s
lightering revenues may be volatile or decline in the future.
The Company is subject to credit risks with respect to its counterparties on contracts, and any failure by those counterparties to
meet their obligations could cause the Company to suffer losses on such contracts, decreasing revenues and earnings.
The Company has entered into, and in the future will enter into, various contracts, including charter agreements and other agreements
associated with the operation of its vessels. The Company charters its vessels to other parties, who pay the Company a daily rate of
hire. The Company also enters voyage charters. Historically, the Company has not experienced material problems collecting charter
hire. The Company also time charters or bareboat charters some of its vessels from other parties and its continued use and operation of
such vessels depends on the vessel owners’ compliance with the terms of the time charter or bareboat charter. Additionally, the
Company enters into derivative contracts (related to interest rate risk) from time to time. As a result, the Company is subject to credit
risks. The ability of each of the Company’s counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract will depend on a number of
factors that are beyond the Company’s control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions; availability of debt
or equity financing; the condition of the maritime and offshore industries; the overall financial condition of the counterparty; charter
rates received for specific types of vessels; and various expenses. Charterers are sensitive to the commodity markets and may be
impacted by market forces affecting commodities such as oil. In addition, in depressed market conditions, the Company’s charterers
and customers may no longer need a vessel that is currently under charter or contract or may be able to obtain a comparable vessel at
lower rates. As a result, the Company’s customers may fail to pay charter hire or attempt to renegotiate charter rates. If the
counterparties fail to meet their obligations, the Company could suffer losses on such contracts which would decrease revenues, cash
flows and earnings.
The Company relies on the skills of its senior management team, and if the Company were required to replace them, it could
negatively impact the effectiveness of management and the Company’s results of operations could be negatively impacted.
INSW’s success depends to a significant extent upon the expertise, capabilities and efforts of its senior executives in managing the
Company’s activities. INSW is led by executives with significant experience in their respective areas of responsibility, and the loss or
unavailability of one or more of INSW’s senior executives for an extended period of time could adversely affect the Company’s
business and results of operations.
The Company may face unexpected drydock costs for its vessels.
Vessels must be drydocked periodically. The cost of repairs and renewals required at each drydock are difficult to predict with
certainty, can be substantial and the Company’s insurance does not cover these costs. In addition, vessels may have to be drydocked in
the event of accidents or other unforeseen damage, and INSW’s insurance may not cover all of these costs. Vessels in drydock will not
generate any income. Large drydocking expenses could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. In
addition, the time when a vessel is out of service for maintenance is determined by a number of factors including regulatory deadlines,
market conditions, shipyard availability and customer requirements, and accordingly the length of time that a vessel may be off-hire
may be longer than anticipated, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
36
International Seaways, Inc.
Technological innovation could reduce the Company’s charter income and the value of the Company’s vessels.
The charter rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors including the vessel’s efficiency,
operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency includes speed, fuel economy and the ability to load and discharge cargo quickly.
Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass through canals and straits. The length of a
vessel’s physical life is related to its original design and construction, its maintenance, the impact of the stress of operations and new
regulations (including in particular regulations relating to GHG emissions). If new tankers are built that are more efficient or more
flexible or have longer physical lives than the Company’s vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced vessels
could adversely affect the charter rates that the Company receives for its vessels and the resale value of the Company’s vessels could
significantly decrease. As a result, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be
adversely affected.
The Company stores, processes, maintains, and transmits confidential information through information technology (“IT”)
systems. Cybersecurity issues, such as data breaches and computer malwares, affecting INSW’s IT systems or those of its third-
party vendors, suppliers or counterparties, could disrupt INSW’s business, result in the unintended disclosure or misuse of
confidential or proprietary information, disruption in regular business operations, damage its reputation, increase its costs, and
cause losses.
The Company collects, stores and transmits sensitive and business critical data, including its own proprietary business information and
that of its counterparties, and personally identifiable information of counterparties and employees, using both its own IT systems and
those of third-party vendors. In addition, the Company relies on the transmission of similarly sensitive data from the Company’s third-
party suppliers and vendors. The safe storage, accurate processing, timely availability and secure transmission of this information is
critical to INSW’s operations. The Company’s dependency on IT systems includes accounting, billing, disbursement, cargo booking
and tracking, vessel scheduling and stowage, vessel operations, customer service, banking, payroll and messaging systems. The
Company’s IT infrastructure, or those of its customers or third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties, are vulnerable to data
breaches, computer malwares, and other security problems as well as failures caused by the occurrence of natural disasters or other
unexpected problems. Many companies, including companies in the shipping industry, have increasingly reported breaches in the
security of their information technology systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to obtain
unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage. The
Company has experienced attempted attacks on its email system to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information.
The Company may be required to spend significant capital and other resources to further protect itself and its systems against threats
of security breaches and computer malware, or to alleviate problems caused by security breaches or malwares. Security breaches and
malware could also expose the Company to claims, litigation and other possible liabilities. Any inability to prevent security breaches
(including the inability of INSW’s third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties to prevent security breaches) could also cause
existing clients to lose confidence in the Company’s IT systems and could adversely affect INSW’s reputation, cause losses to INSW
or our customers, damage our brand, and increase our costs. In order to mitigate the financial impact of any losses arising from
security breaches or computer malwares, the Company has purchased insurance that covers losses arising from such breaches or
malwares, including data recovery, extortion, ransomware and business interruption.
INSW’s revenues are subject to seasonal variations.
INSW operates its tankers in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand for tanker capacity, and therefore,
charter rates. Peaks in tanker demand quite often precede seasonal oil consumption peaks, as refiners and suppliers anticipate
consumer demand. Charter rates for tankers are typically higher in the fall and winter months as a result of increased oil consumption
in the Northern Hemisphere. Unpredictable weather patterns and variations in oil reserves disrupt tanker scheduling. Because a
majority of the Company’s vessels trade in the spot market, seasonality has affected INSW’s operating results on a quarter-to-quarter
basis and could continue to do so in the future. Such seasonality may be outweighed in any period by then current economic
conditions or tanker industry fundamentals.
Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud.
The Company maintains a system of internal controls to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
37
International Seaways, Inc.
The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires the Company to anticipate
and react to changes in its business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a
system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy its reporting obligations as a public company.
Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the system are met. Any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial
statements on a timely basis, could increase the Company’s operating costs and harm its business. Furthermore, investors’ perceptions
that the Company’s internal controls are inadequate or that the Company is unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely
basis may harm its stock price.
Work stoppages or other labor disruptions may adversely affect INSW’s operations.
INSW could be adversely affected by actions taken by employees of other companies in related industries (including third parties
providing services to INSW) against efforts by management to control labor costs, restrain wage or benefit increases or modify work
practices or the failure of other companies in its industry to successfully negotiate collective bargaining agreements.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
Climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions may adversely affect our operating results.
An increasing concern for, and focus on climate change, has promoted extensive existing and proposed international, national and
local regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Compliance with such regulations (including increased assessment,
and greater reporting, of the environmental effects of our business) and our efforts to participate in reducing greenhouse gas emissions
(“GHGs”) will likely increase our compliance costs, require significant capital expenditures to reduce vessel emissions and require
changes to our business.
Our business consists of transporting crude oil and refined petroleum products. Regulatory changes and growing public concern about
the environmental impact of climate change may lead to reduced demand for crude oil and refined petroleum products and decreased
demand for our services, while increasing or creating greater incentives for use of alternative energy sources. We expect regulatory
and consumer efforts aimed at combating climate change to intensify and accelerate. Although we do not expect demand for oil to
decline dramatically over the short-term, in the long-term climate change likely will significantly affect demand for oil and for
alternatives. Any such change could adversely affect our ability to compete in a changing market and our business, financial condition
and results of operations. Further, no assurance can be given that capital expenditures we make to comply with existing or proposed
environmental regulations or strategies that we adopt with respect to changes in demand for crude oil or refined petroleum products or
in demand for our services will be successful.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our
sustainability and governance policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.
Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their sustainability and governance policies. Investor
advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on
such practices and, in recent years, have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. The
increased focus and activism related to these matters may hinder access to capital, as investors and lenders may decide to reallocate
capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s practices. Diminished access to capital could hinder our
growth. Companies that do not adapt to or comply with investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards,
which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for these issues, regardless of
whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and their business, financial condition and share
price may be adversely affected.
We may face increasing pressures from investors, lenders and other market participants, which are increasingly focused on climate
change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices, reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability. As a result, we may be
required to implement more stringent procedures or standards so that our existing and future investors remain invested in us and make
further investments in us, especially given our business of transporting crude oil and refined petroleum products.
38
International Seaways, Inc.
In addition, we will incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report and comply with wide-ranging
sustainability and governance requirements. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Compliance with complex laws, regulations, and, in particular, environmental laws or regulations, including those relating to the
emission of greenhouse gases, may adversely affect INSW’s business.
General
The Company’s operations are affected by extensive and changing international, national and local environmental protection laws,
regulations, treaties, conventions and standards in force in international waters, the jurisdictional waters of the countries in which
INSW’s vessels operate, as well as the countries of its vessels’ registration. Many of these requirements are designed to reduce the
emission of greenhouse gases and the risk of oil spills. They also regulate other water pollution issues, including discharge of ballast
water and effluents and air emissions, including emission of greenhouse gases. These requirements impose significant capital and
operating costs on INSW, including, without limitation, ones related to engine adjustments and ballast water treatment.
Environmental laws and regulations also can affect the resale value or significantly reduce the useful lives of the Company’s vessels,
require a reduction in carrying capacity, ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions (and related increased operating
costs) or retirement of service, lead to decreased availability or higher cost of insurance coverage for environmental matters or result
in the denial of access to, or detention in, certain jurisdictional waters or ports. Under local, United States and international laws, as
well as international treaties and conventions, INSW could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations, in the event that
there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous substances from its vessels or otherwise in connection with its operations. INSW
could also become subject to personal injury or property damage claims relating to the release of or exposure to hazardous materials
associated with its current or historic operations. Violations of or liabilities under environmental requirements also can result in
substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including in certain instances, seizure or detention of the Company’s vessels.
Oil Pollution
INSW could incur significant costs, including cleanup costs, fines, penalties, third-party claims and natural resource damages, as the
result of an oil spill or liabilities under environmental laws. The Company is subject to the oversight of several government agencies,
including the U.S. Coast Guard and the EPA. OPA 90 affects all vessel owners shipping oil or hazardous material to, from or within
the United States. OPA 90 allows for potentially unlimited liability without regard to fault for owners, operators and bareboat
charterers of vessels for oil pollution in U.S. waters. Similarly, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution
Damage, 1969, as amended, which has been adopted by most countries outside of the United States, imposes liability for oil pollution
in international waters. OPA 90 expressly permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to hazardous
materials and oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries. Coastal states in the United States have enacted pollution
prevention liability and response laws, many providing for unlimited liability.
In addition, in complying with OPA 90, IMO regulations, EU directives and other existing laws and regulations and those that may be
adopted, shipowners likely will incur substantial additional capital and/or operating expenditures in meeting new regulatory
requirements, in developing contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining insurance coverage. Key regulatory
initiatives that are anticipated to require substantial additional capital and/or operating expenditures in the next several years include
more stringent limits on the sulfur content of fuel oil for vessels operating in certain areas and more stringent requirements for
management and treatment of ballast water.
Ballast Water
Certain of the Company’s vessels are subject to more stringent numeric discharge limits of ballast water under the EPA’s VGP, with
additional vessels becoming subject in future years, even though those vessels have obtained a valid extension from the USCG for
implementation of treatment technology under the USCG’s final rules. The EPA has determined that it will not issue extensions under
the VGP but has stated that vessels that (i) have received an extension from the USCG, (ii) are in compliance with all of the VGP
requirements other than numeric discharge limits and (iii) meet certain other requirements will be entitled to “low enforcement
priority”. While INSW believes that any vessel that is or may become subject to the more stringent numeric discharge limits of ballast
water meets the conditions for “low enforcement priority,” no assurance can be given that they will do so. If the EPA determines to
enforce the limits for such vessels, such action could have a material adverse effect on INSW. Further, it is anticipated that in 2026 the
39
International Seaways, Inc.
USCG will implement regulations under VIDA at which time the discharge of ballast water in the navigable waters of the United
States will no longer be subject to the VGP. See Item 1, “Business —Environmental and Security Matters Relating to Bulk Shipping.”
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Due to concern over the risk of climate change, a number of countries, including the United States, and international organizations,
including the EU, the IMO and the U.N., have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. These regulatory measures include, among others, adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes,
increased efficiency standards, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. Such actions could result in significant financial and
operational impacts on the Company’s business, including requiring INSW to install new emission controls, acquire allowances or pay
taxes related to its greenhouse gas emissions, or administer and manage a greenhouse gas emission program. See Item 1,
“Business — Environmental and Security Matters Relating to Bulk Shipping”.
Other Impacts
Other government regulation of vessels, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, can be expected to become
stricter in the future and require the Company to incur significant capital expenditures on its vessels to keep them in compliance, or
even to recycle or sell certain vessels altogether. Such expenditures could result in financial and operational impacts that may be
material to INSW’s financial statements. Additionally, the failure of a shipowner or bareboat charterer to comply with local, domestic
and international regulations may subject it to increased liability, may invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance
coverage for the affected vessels and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. If any of our vessels are denied
access to, or are detained in, certain ports, reputation, business, financial results and cash flows could be materially and adversely
affected.
Accidents involving highly publicized oil spills and other mishaps involving vessels can be expected in the tanker industry, and such
accidents or other events could be expected to result in the adoption of even stricter laws and regulations, which could limit the
Company’s operations or its ability to do business and which could have a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial
results and cash flows. In addition, the Company is required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain
certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to its operations. The Company believes its vessels are maintained in good
condition in compliance with present regulatory requirements, are operated in compliance with applicable safety and environmental
laws and regulations and are insured against usual risks for such amounts as the Company’s management deems appropriate. The
vessels’ operating certificates and licenses are renewed periodically during each vessel’s required annual survey. However,
government regulation of tankers, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental impact may change in the future and require
the Company to incur significant capital expenditures with respect to its ships to keep them in compliance.
Employment of the Company’s vessels could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment process.
The shipping industry, and especially vessels that transport crude oil and refined petroleum products, is heavily regulated. In addition,
the “oil majors” such as BP, Chevron Corporation, Phillips 66, ExxonMobil Corp., Royal Dutch Shell and Total S.A. have developed
a strict due diligence process for selecting their shipping partners out of concerns for the environmental impact of spills. This vetting
process has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive risk assessment of both the vessel manager and the vessel, including
audits of the management office and physical inspections of the ship. Under the terms of the Company’s charter agreements (including
those entered into by pools in which the Company participates), the Company’s charterers require that the Company’s vessels and the
technical managers pass vetting inspections and management audits, respectively. The Company’s failure to maintain any of its
vessels to the standards required by the oil majors could put the Company in breach of the applicable charter agreement and lead to
termination of such agreement. Should the Company not be able to successfully clear the oil majors’ risk assessment processes on an
ongoing basis, the future employment of the Company’s vessels could also be adversely affected. since it might lead to the oil majors’
terminating existing charters.
The Company’s vessels may be directed to call on ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the U.S., the
U.N., the U.K. or the EU, which could negatively affect the trading price of the Company’s common shares.
From time to time, certain of the Company’s vessels, on the instructions of the charterers or pool manager responsible for the
commercial management of such vessels, have called and may again call on ports located in countries or territories, and/or operated by
40
International Seaways, Inc.
persons, subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the U.S., the U.N., the U.K. or the EU and countries identified by the U.S.,
the U.N., the U.K. or the EU as state sponsors of terrorism. The U.S., U.N., the U.K. and EU sanctions and embargo laws and
regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such
sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or expanded over time. Some sanctions may also apply to transportation
of goods (including crude oil) originating in sanctioned countries (particularly Iran, Venezuela and Russia), even if the vessel does not
travel to those countries, or is otherwise acting on behalf of sanctioned persons. Sanctions may include the imposition of penalties and
fines against companies violating national law or companies acting outside the jurisdiction of the sanctioning power themselves
becoming the target of sanctions.
Although INSW believes that it is in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations and intends to
maintain such compliance, and INSW does not, and does not intend to, engage in sanctionable activity, INSW might fail to comply or
may inadvertently engage in a sanctionable activity in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be
subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation or sanctionable activity could result in fines or other penalties, or the
imposition of sanctions against the Company, and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or
not to invest, in the Company and negatively affect INSW’s reputation and investor perception of the value of INSW’s common stock.
The Company may be subject to litigation and government inquiries or investigations that, if not resolved in the Company’s favor
and not sufficiently covered by insurance, could have a material adverse effect on it.
The Company has been and is, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters and subject to government inquiries and
investigations. These matters may include, among other things, regulatory proceedings and litigation arising out of or relating to
contract disputes, personal injury claims, environmental claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, employment
matters, governmental claims for taxes or duties, sanctions and other regulatory compliance, and other disputes that arise in the
ordinary course of the Company’s business.
Although the Company intends to defend these matters vigorously, it cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any such
matter, and the ultimate outcome of these matters or the potential costs to resolve them could involve or result in significant
expenditures or losses by the Company, or result in significant changes to INSW’s insurance costs, rules and practices in dealing with
its customers, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future operating results, including profitability, cash
flows, and financial condition. Insurance may not be applicable or sufficient in all cases and/or insurers may not remain solvent, which
may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. The Company’s recorded liabilities and estimates of
reasonably possible losses for its contingent liabilities are based on its assessment of potential liability using the information available
to the Company at the time and, as applicable, any past experience and trends with respect to similar matters. However, because
litigation is inherently uncertain, the Company’s estimates for contingent liabilities may be insufficient to cover the actual liabilities
from such claims, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. See Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 19, “Contingencies,” to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Maritime claimants could arrest INSW’s vessels, which could interrupt cash flows.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien
against that vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by
arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of the Company’s vessels could interrupt
INSW’s cash flow and require it to pay a significant amount of money to have the arrest lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such
as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s
maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, meaning any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert
“sister ship” liability against one vessel in the Company’s fleet for claims relating to another vessel in its fleet which, if successful,
could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Governments could requisition the Company’s vessels during a period of war or emergency, which may negatively impact the
Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and available cash.
A government could requisition one or more of the Company’s vessels for title or hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government
takes control of a vessel and becomes the owner. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and
41
International Seaways, Inc.
effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency.
Government requisition of one or more of the Company’s vessels may negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition,
results of operations and available cash.
We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income, which would reduce our net income and cash flows.
If we do not qualify for an exemption pursuant to Section 883, or the “Section 883 exemption,” of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”) then we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our shipping income that is derived from U.S.
sources. If we are subject to such tax, our results of operations and cash flows would be reduced by the amount of such tax. We will
qualify for the Section 883 exemption for 2025 and forward if, among other things, (i) our common shares are treated as primarily and
regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States or another qualified country (“publicly traded test”), or (ii) we
satisfy one of two other ownership tests. Under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, the publicly traded test will not be satisfied in
any taxable year in which persons who directly, indirectly or constructively own five percent or more of our common shares
(sometimes referred to as “5% shareholders”) own in the aggregate 50% or more of the vote and value of our common shares for more
than half the days in such year, unless an exception applies. We can provide no assurance that ownership of our common shares by 5%
shareholders will allow us to qualify for the Section 883 exemption in 2025 and any other future taxable years. If we do not qualify for
the Section 883 exemption, our gross shipping income derived from U.S. sources, i.e., 50% of our gross shipping income attributable
to transportation beginning or ending in the United States (but not both beginning and ending in the United States), generally would be
subject to a four percent tax without allowance for deductions.
U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences to U.S. shareholders.
A non-U.S. corporation generally will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company,” or a “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax
purposes if, after applying certain look through rules, either (i) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of
“passive income” or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of assets (determined on a quarterly basis) held for the production of
“passive income.” We refer to assets which produce or are held for production of “passive income” as “passive assets.” For purposes
of these tests, “passive income” generally includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and
rental income and royalties other than rental income and royalties which are received from unrelated parties in connection with the
active conduct of a trade or business, as defined in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. Passive income does not include income
derived from the performance of services. Although there is no authority under the PFIC rules directly on point, and existing legal
authority in other contexts is inconsistent in its treatment of time charter income, we believe that the gross income we derive or are
deemed to derive from our time and spot chartering activities is services income, rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe
that (i) our income from time and spot chartering activities does not constitute passive income and (ii) the assets that we own and
operate in connection with the production of that income do not constitute passive assets. Therefore, we believe that we are not now
and have never been a PFIC with respect to any taxable year. There is no assurance that the IRS or a court of law will accept our
position and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, because there are
uncertainties in the application of the PFIC rules and PFIC status is determined annually and is based on the composition of a
company’s income and assets (which are subject to change), we can provide no assurance that we will not become a PFIC in any
future taxable year. If we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year (and regardless of whether we remain as a PFIC for
subsequent taxable years), our U.S. shareholders would be subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to
distributions received from us and gain, if any, derived from the sale or other disposition of our common shares. These adverse tax
consequences to shareholders could negatively impact our ability to issue additional equity in order to raise the capital necessary for
our business operations.
Pending and future tax law changes may result in significant additional taxes to us.
Tax laws, including tax rates, in the jurisdictions in which we operate may change as a result of macroeconomic or other factors
outside of our control and may result in significant additional taxes to us. For example, various governments and organizations such
as the EU and Organization for Economic Co-operation Development (or the OECD) are increasingly focused on tax reform and other
legislative or regulatory action to increase tax revenue. In January 2019, the OECD announced further work in continuation of its
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project, focusing on two “pillars”. Pillar One provides a framework for the reallocation of certain
residual profits of multinational enterprises to market jurisdictions where goods or services are used or consumed. Pillar Two
consists of two interrelated rules referred to as Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules, which operate to impose a minimum tax rate of 15%
calculated on a jurisdictional basis. The Pillar Two Model Rules are designed to ensure that large multinational enterprises (MNEs)
42
International Seaways, Inc.
that have annual revenues of €750 million or more in at least two of the four fiscal years immediately preceding the tested fiscal year
pay a minimum level of tax on the income arising in each jurisdiction where they operate. In October 2021, more than 130 countries
tentatively signed on to a framework that imposes a minimum tax rate of 15%, among other provisions. The framework calls for law
enactment by OECD and G20 members in 2022 to take effect in 2024 and 2025. Qualifying International Shipping Income is exempt
from many aspects of this framework if the exemption requirements are satisfied. As currently drafted, the exemption requirements
are limited to the extent strategic and/or commercial management of ships are carried on from within the jurisdiction in which the ship
owning and revenue generating entity is domiciled. On December 20, 2021, the OECD published model rules to implement the Pillar
Two rules, which are generally consistent with the agreement reached by the framework in October 2021. On December 12, 2022,
the EU member states agreed to implement the OECD’s Pillar Two global corporate minimum tax rate of 15% on large multinational
enterprises with revenues of at least €750 million, which became effective in 2024. A number of countries have adopted the OECD’s
minimum tax rules and have implemented these rules or local versions of these rules effective January 1, 2024. None of the
Company’s subsidiaries are domiciled in such jurisdictions as of December 31, 2024, however. these laws as enacted and
implemented could result in additional tax imposed on us or our subsidiaries if we or our subsidiaries decide to do business from such
jurisdictions in the future.
In addition, national or local tax authorities may assert other claims in various circumstances. During 2023, the tax authorities in one
country notified many international shipping companies, including the Company, that they may have failed to comply with extant laws
applicable in such country with respect to registration, reporting possible income derived from such country, filing of appropriate tax
returns, and payment of relevant taxes with respect to international shipping operations. While the law has been in place for many
years, there has not been any previous enforcement and there is significant lack of clarity as to who may be subject to tax under the
legislation and what income, if any, may be subject to taxation. Similarly, the status of the taxation of international shipping income in
certain other countries is equally uncertain. The Company believes that any income tax liability that may arise in all such countries
would not be material to the Company, but no assurance can be made as to the amount of any such liability, if any.
Risks Related to the Common Stock
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate case law or bankruptcy law,
and, as a result, shareholders may have fewer rights and protections under Marshall Islands law than under a typical jurisdiction
in the United States.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act
(the "BCA"). The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States.
However, there have been few judicial cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of
directors under the law of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors
under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S. jurisdictions. Shareholder rights may differ as well. While the BCA
does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially
similar legislative provisions, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by
management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction. In
addition, the Marshall Islands does not have a well-developed body of bankruptcy law. As such, in the case of a bankruptcy involving
us, there may be a delay of bankruptcy proceedings and the ability of securityholders and creditors to receive recovery after a
bankruptcy proceeding, and any such recovery may be less predictable.
It may be difficult to serve process on or enforce a United States judgment against us, our officers and our directors because we
are a foreign corporation.
We are a corporation formed in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. In addition, a substantial portion of our assets are located outside
of the United States. As a result, you may have difficulty serving legal process within the United States upon us. You may also have
difficulty enforcing, both in and outside the United States, judgments you may obtain in U.S. courts against us or our directors and
officers, including in actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities laws. Furthermore, there is
substantial doubt that the courts of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or of the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which our offices are
located would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on U.S. federal or state securities laws.
43
International Seaways, Inc.
The market price of the Company’s securities may fluctuate significantly.
The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. However, the market price of the Company’s common
stock may fluctuate substantially. You may not be able to resell your common stock at or above the price you paid for such securities
due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. These risks include those described or referred to in this
“Risk Factors” section and under “Forward -Looking Statements,” as well as, among other things: fluctuations in the Company’s
operating results; activities of and results of operations of the Company’s competitors; changes in the Company’s relationships with
the Company’s customers or the Company’s vendors; changes in business or regulatory conditions; changes in the Company’s capital
structure; any announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures;
additions or departures of key personnel; investors’ general perception of the Company; failure to meet market expectations; future
sales of the Company’s securities by it, directors, executives and significant stockholders; changes in domestic and international
economic and political conditions; and other events or factors, including those resulting from natural disasters, war, acts of terrorism
or responses to these events. Any of the foregoing factors could also cause the price of the Company’s equity securities to fall and may
expose the Company to securities class action litigation. Any securities class action litigation could result in substantial costs and the
diversion of management’s attention and resources.
In addition, the stock market has recently experienced volatility that, in some cases, has been unrelated or disproportionate to the
operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of
the Company’s common stock, regardless of its actual operating performance.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about the Company’s business,
the price and/or trading volume of shares of the Company’s common stock could decline.
The trading market for shares of the Company’s common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or
industry analysts publish about the Company and its business. If too few analysts commence and maintain coverage of the
Company, the trading price for its shares might be adversely affected. Similarly, if analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable
research about the Company’s business, the price and/or trading volume of shares of the Company’s common stock could
decline.
Our limited duration Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights plan dated as of April 11, 2023 (the “Amended and Restated
Rights Plan”), also known as a “poison pill”, may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Company or changes in
our management and, therefore, depress the market price of the Company’s common stock.
The Amended and Restated Rights Plan is intended to enable all Company stockholders to realize the long-term value of their
investment in the Company. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan reduces the likelihood that any person or group gains control of
the Company through open market accumulation, or other tactics potentially disadvantaging the interests of all stockholders, without
paying all stockholders an appropriate control premium or providing the Company’s Board of Directors sufficient time to make
informed decisions in the best interests of all stockholders. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan was ratified by the Company’s
stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 6, 2023. While the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement
was effective immediately, the Rights become exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership, as defined in the
Rights Agreement, of 20% or more of the Company’s common stock in a transaction not approved by the Company's Board of
Directors. In that situation, each holder of a Right (other than the acquiring person or group) will have the right to purchase, upon
payment of the then-current exercise price, a number of shares of Company common stock having a market value of twice the exercise
price of the Right. In addition, at any time after a person or group acquires 20% or more of the Company’s common stock (unless such
person or group acquires 50% or more), the Company’s Board of Directors may exchange one share of the Company’s common stock
for each outstanding Right (other than Rights owned by such person or group, which would have become null and void). The
Amended and Restated Rights Plan is not intended to interfere with any transaction that the Board of Directors determines is in the
best interests of stockholders, nor does the Amended and Restated Rights Plan prevent the Board of Directors from considering any
proposal. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan will expire on April 10, 2026, subject to earlier termination by the Company’s
Board of Directors if the Board determines that market and other conditions warrant.
Notwithstanding the foregoing advantages provided by the Amended and Restated Rights Plan to the interests of all stockholders, the
Amended and Restated Rights Plan may depress the market price of the Company’s common stock by acting to discourage, delay or
44
International Seaways, Inc.
prevent a change of control of the Company or changes in the management of the Company that the stockholders of the Company may
deem advantageous.
Future offerings of debt or equity securities by the Company may materially adversely affect the share price, and future capitalization
measures could lead to substantial dilution of existing stockholders’ interests in the Company.
The Company may seek to raise additional equity through the issuance of new shares or convertible or exchangeable bonds to
finance future organic growth or acquisitions. Increasing the number of issued shares would dilute the ownership interests of
existing stockholders. Stockholders’ ownership interests could also be diluted if other companies or equity interests in
companies are acquired in exchange for new shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued and if the Company’s Board of
Directors makes grants of equity awards to the Company’s directors, officers and employees pursuant to any equity incentive or
compensation plan, any such grants would also cause dilution.
INSW may not continue to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock.
During 2024, 2023 and 2022 INSW paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $284.4 million or $5.77 per share,
$308.2 million or $6.29 per share, and $69.8 million or $1.42 per share, respectively. Any future determinations to pay dividends on
its Common Stock will be at the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including INSW’s future
operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors its
Board of Directors may deem relevant. The timing, declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion
of INSW’s Board of Directors. INSW has no obligation to, and may not be able to, declare or pay dividends on its Common Stock. If
INSW does not declare and pay dividends on its Common Stock, its share price could decline.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY
Cybersecurity Risk Management Program and Strategy
Cybersecurity Threats
In today’s digitally interconnected workspace, we are increasingly vulnerable to cybersecurity threats that can disrupt operations, and
compromise sensitive information. Cybersecurity threats are continuously evolving and can vary widely, but some common types of
material cyber threats include:
Malware: Malicious software such as viruses, worms, trojans, and ransomware can infiltrate systems and disrupt operations,
steal sensitive information, or extort money from the organization.
Phishing: Phishing attacks involve tricking individuals into revealing sensitive information such as login credentials or
financial data by posing as a trustworthy entity via email, phone calls, or text messages.
Denial of Service (“DoS”) Attacks: These attacks aim to overwhelm a network, server, or website with an excessive amount
of traffic, rendering it inaccessible to legitimate users.
Insider Threats: Employees, contractors, or other trusted individuals may intentionally or unintentionally compromise
security by stealing data, sharing sensitive information, or performing unauthorized actions.
Social Engineering: Social engineering tactics involve manipulating individuals into divulging confidential information or
performing actions that compromise security, often through psychological manipulation or deception.
45
International Seaways, Inc.
Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers may target third-party vendors, suppliers, or service providers to international seaways to
gain unauthorized access to their systems or data.
IoT Vulnerabilities: Internet of Things (“IoT”) devices used in maritime operations can pose security vulnerabilities if not
properly secured, potentially allowing attackers to gain access to critical systems or data.
Data Breaches: Unauthorized access to sensitive data, such as business strategy, financial records, or operational data, can
lead to financial loss, legal repercussions, and damage to the organization's reputation.
Cyber Espionage: State-sponsored or corporate espionage efforts may target to steal sensitive information, gain intelligence
on operations, or disrupt critical infrastructure.
We maintain a comprehensive process for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats as part of our
overall risk management system and processes, including risks relating to disruption of business operations or financial reporting
systems, intellectual property theft; fraud; extortion; harm to employees or customers; violation of privacy laws and other litigation
and legal risk; and reputation risk.
Cybersecurity is a critical component of the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management program. The Company has established an
information security framework to help safeguard the confidentiality and integrity of, and access to its information assets and to ensure
regulatory, contractual, and operational compliance.
Our cybersecurity risk management strategy includes the following:
Our program is based on the National Institute of Standard and Technology(“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework and the
Center for Internet Security Critical Security Controls (“CIS”).
We have adopted a “defense in depth” cybersecurity strategy and deployed multiple layers of security measures to
protect the Company’s information assets and detect any potential breach quickly. Our multi-layered protection
mechanisms are designed to address the security vulnerabilities inherent not only with hardware and software but also
due to human error. In an extreme situation, if all the security layers fail and a breach happens, our multiple detection
layers are designed to detect the breach.
Human Layer: We realize that the users of the information assets are the first line of defense and cyber risk
prevention is every INSW employee’s responsibility. We organize mandatory cybersecurity awareness training for
all staff yearly and conduct simulation tests monthly to check employee preparedness in the detection of phishing
attacks. We also maintain an IT Security Policy and Procedures document, that describes Company security policy
and practices in detail.
Network Security: We deploy firewalls to shield the Company’s network from malicious or untoward network
traffic that violates security policies. Our firewalls are equipped with intrusion detection and intrusion prevention
systems to detect and prevent potential attacks.
Logical Security: Access to the Company’s information assets is governed by the IT Security Policy and
Procedures document, which stipulates the procedure for granting new access, change in access, and access
termination. All access changes are audited. All new system access is approved by designated data owners ensuring
segregation of duties. We have a documented strong password policy for all users and all privileged access is
restricted. All remote access is controlled using geofencing restrictions and requires multi-factor authentication.
Operating System and Application Security: We have a vulnerability scanning tool in place that scans all
information assets monthly to report any vulnerabilities. Those reports are analyzed by system administrators for
appropriate mitigating actions. We have implemented an email security tool that sanitizes all incoming emails for
malicious content, attachments, or links.
Log Monitoring: We employ a reputable third-party managed security service provider (“MSSP”), who manages
logs from all critical information assets of the Company. The MSSP’s Security Operations Center (“SOC”) assists
46
International Seaways, Inc.
the Company in detecting and preventing any potential cyberattack at an early stage by analyzing the log data and
correlating that with the latest threat intelligence.
End Point Security: We allow access to all information assets only from authorized and standard devices
(“endpoints”). All endpoints have a next-generation anti-virus tool installed that uses a combination of artificial
intelligence, behavioral detection, and machine learning algorithms to anticipate and prevent known and unknown
threats. All endpoints also have an extended detection and response (“XDR”) tool installed that provides a proactive
approach to threat detection and response by collecting and correlating data across multiple security layers. Alerts
from all these tools are actively monitored and appropriate alerts/escalations are issued.
Data Security: The core objective of our cybersecurity program is securing the Company’s sensitive data across
all information assets while maintaining appropriate access for authorized personnel. To prevent any accidental data
loss, we strictly follow the principle of “least privilege,” and limit users' access rights to only what is required to do
their jobs. Further, all the disks are encrypted, and daily backups of all computers are maintained outside the
Company’s network.
We maintain a detailed incident response plan to identify, manage, investigate, and remediate various types of
cybersecurity incidents. This plan provides organizational and operational structures, processes, and procedures to allow
responsible personnel to initiate and execute a proper response to cybersecurity incidents that may affect the function and
security of IT assets, information resources, and business operations. The plan describes the processes for cybersecurity
incident severity assessment, materiality determination, roles and responsibilities for the incident response team
members, and necessary alerts and notifications.
The plan is regularly updated, reviewed by management, and tested yearly involving relevant stakeholders so that all are
familiar with their roles and responsibilities in case of a cyber incident.
We routinely review the effectiveness of our cybersecurity program using the applicable CIS Critical Security Controls and take
necessary actions.
We employ external independent experts to review and test the effectiveness of our cybersecurity processes, and protection and
detection mechanisms. The findings are reviewed by management and approved changes are prioritized and implemented.
We have a retainer agreement with a reputable cyber incident response team, who assists the Company in reviewing the cyber incident
response plan and conducting yearly tabletop drills. The experts on the cyber incident response team are available on a priority basis to
assist the Company with forensics and other sophisticated analyses and investigations in case of a cyber incident for quick response
and efficient recovery.
We have insurance coverage for losses and expenses related to liability, privacy and regulatory actions, incident response, business
interruption, data recovery, hardware replacement, extortion, and reputational harm arising from potential cybersecurity incidents.
Cybersecurity Incidents
Our business strategy, results of operations and financial condition have not been materially affected by risks from cybersecurity
threats, including as a result of previous cybersecurity incidents, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not be materially
affected in the future by such risks and any future material incidents. In the last three fiscal years, we have not experienced any
material information security breach incidences and the expenses we have incurred from information security breach incidences were
immaterial. This includes penalties and settlements, of which there were none.
See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our cybersecurity-related risks.
47
International Seaways, Inc.
Cybersecurity Governance
Management
Our cybersecurity risk management program is managed by the Chief Information Security Officer (the “CISO”) and overseen by the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer. Our CISO has over 25 years of experience in maritime IT. He holds an
MBA and a Master of Science degree in Information Management and is a Certified Information Security Manager from the
Information Systems Audit and Control Association, certified in Cybersecurity Risk Management by Harvard University,
Cybersecurity Oversight by Carnegie Mellon, and Maritime Cybersecurity by Lloyds Maritime.
The CISO and other members of the IT security team actively participate in maritime-specific as well as other broader cybersecurity
groups for collaboration on cyber resilience, threat intelligence sharing, and best practices exchange. All the members of the IT
security team regularly undergo new training/certifications on cybersecurity and attend seminars/conferences related to cybersecurity
to keep their knowledge and expertise current. The CISO meets with the Chief Executive Officer of the Company monthly, and more
frequently if warranted, to provide updates on cybersecurity programs, threats, and incidents.
Board of Directors
The Corporate Governance and Risk Assessment Committee (the “Governance Committee”) of the Board of Directors is primarily
responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats. To fulfill this responsibility, the Governance Committee receives
regular updates, at least quarterly about the Company’s cybersecurity risks and mitigation program from management, specifically the
CISO. The Chairman of the Governance Committee provides quarterly reports of such updates to the full Board of Directors. The
CISO’s quarterly report to the Governance Committee contains updates to the cybersecurity risk register, summaries of any material
cybersecurity threats or incidents and responses thereto, updates on cybersecurity trends and the results of any assessments performed.
The quarterly reports also include changes to cybersecurity processes, products and third-party service providers, third-party
cybersecurity risk reviews, and regulatory changes.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We lease approximately 13,100 square feet of office space for the Company’s New York headquarters. We do not own or lease any
production facilities, plants, mines or similar real properties.
At December 31, 2024, the Company owned or operated an aggregate of 78 vessels, which included 15 chartered-in vessels. See tables
presented under Item 1, “Business—Fleet Operations.”
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 19, “Contingencies” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for information regarding legal proceedings in which we are involved.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
48
International Seaways, Inc.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information, Holders and Dividends
The Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbol INSW. The
range of high and low closing sales prices of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NYSE for each of the quarters during
the last two years are set forth below:
Common stock (INSW)
(In dollars)
High
Low
2024
First Quarter
$ 54.27
$ 46.59
Second Quarter
$ 65.13
$ 51.33
Third Quarter
$ 60.19
$ 47.67
Fourth Quarter
$ 54.30
$ 32.46
2023
First Quarter
$ 52.88
$ 33.29
Second Quarter
$ 42.47
$ 35.30
Third Quarter
$ 46.72
$ 35.91
Fourth Quarter
$ 49.67
$ 40.97
As of February 20, 2025, there were 51 stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock.
During 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared and paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $284.4
million or $5.77 per share as follows:
Declaration Date
Record Date
Payment Date
Regular Quarterly
Dividend per Share
Supplemental
Dividend per Share
Total Dividends Paid
February 28, 2024
March 14, 2024
March 28, 2024
$0.12
$1.20
$64.7 million
May 7, 2024
June 12, 2024
June 26, 2024
$0.12
$1.63
$86.9 million
August 6, 2024
September 11, 2024
September 25, 2024
$0.12
$1.38
$73.8 million
November 6, 2024
December 13, 2024
December 27, 2024
$0.12
$1.08
$59.0 million
On February 26, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of common
stock and a supplemental dividend of $0.58 per share of common stock, both payable on March 28, 2025 to shareholders of record at
the close of business on March 14, 2025. The declaration and timing of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the
Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our future operations and earnings, capital requirements, general
financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law or the SEC and such other factors as our Board of
Directors may deem relevant.
49
International Seaways, Inc.
Purchase and Sale of Equity Securities
The following is a summary of the purchases, excluding commissions, made under the Company’s stock repurchase program during
the three years ended December 31, 2024:
Year-ended December 31,
Total shares repurchased
Average Price per share
Total Cost
2024
501,646
$49.81
$25.0 million
2023
366,483
$38.03
$13.9 million
2022
687,740
$29.08
$20.0 million
The Company has had a stock repurchase program since 2017. Under the program, the Company can opportunistically repurchase
shares of the Company’s common stock (up to the authorized program limits) from time to time, on the open market or otherwise, in
such quantities, at such prices, in such manner and on such terms and conditions as management determined was in the best interests
of the Company. Shares owned by employees, directors and other affiliates of the Company are not eligible for repurchase under this
program without further authorization from the Board. In November 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase
in the share purchase program to $50.0 million from $25.0 million, which was the remaining authorization after the open-market
purchases that occurred during the third quarter of 2024. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2024, the remaining buyback authorization
under the Company’s stock repurchase program expiring on December 31, 2025, was $50.0 million or 1,391,207 shares based on the
December 31, 2024 closing price of the stock. Future buybacks under the stock repurchase program will be at the discretion of our
Board of Directors and subject to limitations under the Company’s debt facilities.
See Note 12, “Capital Stock and Stock Compensation,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8,
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for a description of shares withheld to cover tax withholding
liabilities relating to the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by certain members of management, which is incorporated
by reference in this Item 5.
On December 20, 2023, the Company adopted an “at the market” offering program in connection with general corporate housekeeping
and entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Evercore Group L.L.C. and Jefferies LLC, as
our sales agents, relating to the common shares of International Seaways, Inc. In accordance with the terms of the Distribution
Agreement, we may offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million from time to time
through the sales agents. Sales of shares of our common stock, if any, may be made in privately negotiated transactions, which may
include block trades, or transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including sales made directly on the NYSE or sales made to or through a market maker other
than on an exchange or as otherwise agreed upon by the sales agents and us. We also may sell some or all of the shares in this offering
to a sales agent as principal for its own account at a price per share agreed upon at the time of sale.
We will designate the minimum price per share at which the common shares may be sold and the maximum amount of common shares
to be sold through the sales agents during any selling period or otherwise determine such maximum amount together with the sales
agents. Each sales agent will receive from us a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross sales price of all common shares sold through it
as sales agent under the Distribution Agreement. In connection with the sale of common stock, each of the sales agents may be
deemed an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and the compensation paid to the sales agents may be deemed to be
underwriting commission.
The sales agents are not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of our common shares but will use their commercially
reasonable efforts, as our agents and subject to the terms of the Distribution Agreement, to sell the common shares offered, as
requested by us.
We intend to use the net proceeds of any offering, after deducting the sales agents’ commissions and our offering expenses, for
general corporate purposes. This may include, among other things, additions to working capital, repayment or refinancing of existing
indebtedness or other corporate obligations, financing of capital expenditures (including the purchase of marine exhaust gas cleaning
systems that reduce sulfur emissions to comply with upcoming implementation of new IMO standards) and acquisitions and
investment in existing and future projects. As of the date hereof, the Company has neither sold or undertaken to sell any shares
pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. The Company has no obligation to sell any shares and may at any time suspend offers under
the Distribution Agreement or terminate the Distribution Agreement.
50
International Seaways, Inc.
Stockholder Return Performance Presentation
Set forth below is a line graph for the period between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2024 comparing the percentage change in the
cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock against the cumulative return of (i) the published Standard and
Poor’s 500 index and (ii) a peer group index consisting of Frontline Ltd. (FRO), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN), Teekay
Tankers Ltd. Class A (TNK), DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT), Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC), Scorpio Tankers, Inc. (STNG),
CMB.Tech NV (CMBT), and the Company, referred to as the peer group index.
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
THE COMPANY, S&P 500 INDEX, PEER GROUP INDEX
*Assumes that the value of the investment in the Company’s common stock and each index was $100 on January 1, 2020 and that all
dividends were reinvested.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” for further
information on the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the 2020 Management Incentive
Compensation Plan and the 2020 Non-Employee Director Incentive Compensation Plan.
51
International Seaways, Inc.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
This MD&A, which should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8,
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” provides a discussion and analysis of our business, current developments, financial
condition, cash flows and results of operations. It is organized as follows:
General. This section provides a general description of our business, which we believe is important in understanding the
results of our operations, financial condition and potential future trends.
Operations & Oil Tanker Markets. This section provides an overview of industry operations and dynamics that have an
impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
Results from Vessel Operations. This section provides an analysis of our results of operations presented on a business
segment basis. In addition, a brief description of significant transactions and other items that affect the comparability of the
results is provided, if applicable.
Liquidity and Sources of Capital. This section provides an analysis of our cash flows, outstanding debt and commitments.
Included in the analysis of our outstanding debt is a discussion of the amount of financial capacity available to fund our
ongoing operations and future commitments as well as a discussion of the Company’s planned and/or already executed
capital allocation activities.
Risk Management. This section provides a general overview of how the interest rate, currency and fuel price volatility risks
are managed by the Company.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies. This section identifies those accounting policies that are considered important to
our results of operations and financial condition, require significant judgment and involve significant management estimates.
A detailed discussion of the 2023 to 2022 year-over-year changes is not included herein and can be found in Item 7 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 filed on February 29, 2024.
GENERAL
We are a provider of ocean transportation services for crude oil and refined petroleum products. We operate our vessels in the
International Flag market. Our business includes two reportable segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. For the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023 we derived 53% and 51%, respectively, of our TCE revenues from our Product Carriers segment.
Revenues from our Crude Tankers segment constituted the balance of our TCE revenues during these periods.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s operating fleet consisted of 78 wholly-owned or lease financed and time chartered-in
vessels aggregating 9.1 million deadweight tons (“dwt”). In addition to our operating fleet of 78 vessels, six LR1 newbuilds are
scheduled for delivery to the Company between the second half of 2025 and third quarter of 2026, bringing the total operating and
newbuild fleet to 84 vessels. Our fleet includes VLCC, Suezmax and Aframax crude tankers and LR2, LR1 and MR product carriers.
The Company’s revenues are highly sensitive to patterns of supply and demand for vessels of the size and design configurations
owned and operated by the Company and the trades in which those vessels operate. Rates for the transportation of crude oil and
refined petroleum products from which the Company earns a substantial majority of its revenues are determined by market forces such
as the supply and demand for oil, the distance that cargoes must be transported, and the number of vessels expected to be available at
the time such cargoes need to be transported. The demand for oil shipments is significantly affected by the state of the global
economy, levels of U.S. domestic and international production and OPEC exports. The number of vessels is affected by newbuilding
deliveries and by the removal of existing vessels from service, principally through storage, recycling or conversions. The Company’s
revenues are also affected by its vessel employment strategy, which seeks to achieve the optimal mix of spot (voyage charter) and
long-term (time or bareboat charter) charters. Because shipping revenues and voyage expenses are significantly affected by the mix
52
International Seaways, Inc.
between voyage charters and time charters, the Company measures the performance of its fleet of vessels based on TCE revenues.
Management makes economic decisions based on anticipated TCE rates and evaluates financial performance based on TCE rates
achieved. In order to take advantage of market conditions and optimize economic performance, management employs all of the
Company’s LR1 product carriers, which currently participate in the Panamax International pool, in the transportation of crude oil
cargoes.
Our revenues are derived predominantly from spot market voyage charters and our vessels are predominantly employed in the spot
market via market-leading commercial pools. We derived approximately 86% and 91% of our total TCE revenues in the spot market
for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The future minimum revenues, before reduction for brokerage
commissions, expected to be received on non-cancelable time charters for three VLCCs, one Suezmax, one Aframax, one LR2 and
eight MRs as of December 31, 2024 are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Amount(1)
2025
$
115.6
2026
79.6
2027
39.4
2028
34.0
2029
34.0
Thereafter
7.1
Future minimum revenues
$
309.6
(1) Future minimum contracted revenues do not include the Company’s share of time charters entered into by the pools in which
it participates or profit-sharing above the base rate on the newbuild dual-fuel LNG VLCCs. In arriving at the minimum future
charter revenues, an estimated time off-hire to perform periodic maintenance on each vessel has been deducted, although
there is no assurance that such estimate will be reflective of the actual off-hire in the future.
53
International Seaways, Inc.
Russian-Ukraine Conflict
The ongoing military conflict in Ukraine has had a significant direct and indirect impact on the trade of crude oil and refined
petroleum products. This conflict has resulted in the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union, among other countries,
implementing sanctions and executive orders against citizens, entities, and activities connected to Russia. Some of these sanctions and
executive orders target the Russian oil sector, including a prohibition on the import of oil from Russia to the United States or the
United Kingdom, and the European Union's ban on Russian crude oil and petroleum products which took effect in December 2022 and
February 2023, respectively.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine also led to a disruption in supply chains for crude oil and refined petroleum products, changing volumes
and trade routes, thus increasing ton-mile demand for the seaborne transportation of both crude oil and refined petroleum products,
which resulted in a prolonged spike in freight rates. Self-sanctioning by Western oil majors and many ship owners resulted in
disrupted product flows, primarily diesel, from Russia to Europe, while high arbitrage spreads incentivized Middle Eastern and U.S.
diesel flows to Europe, increasing ton-mile demand for vessels.
The U.S., EU nations and other countries could impose wider sanctions and take other actions. Further sanctions imposed or actions
taken by the U.S., EU nations or other countries, and retaliatory measures by Russia in response, could lead to increased volatility in
global oil demand, which could have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, it is
possible that third parties with which we do business may be impacted by events in Russia and Ukraine, which could adversely affect
us. See Item 1A, Risk Factors – Terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability can affect the tanker industry, which
could adversely affect INSW’s business.
Red Sea Attacks
The ongoing military conflict between Israel and Hamas has had a direct and indirect impact on the trade of crude oil and refined
petroleum products. Heightened security risks because of attacks on merchant vessels transiting through the Red Sea to or from the
Suez Canal has led to an increase in ton-mile demand for vessels as more vessel owners are opting to re-route their vessels around the
Cape of Good Hope. See Item 1A, Risk Factors – Terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability can affect the tanker
industry, which could adversely affect INSW’s business.
OPERATIONS AND OIL TANKER MARKETS
The International Energy Agency (“IEA”) estimates global oil consumption for the fourth quarter of 2024 at 104.0 million barrels per
day (“b/d”), up 1.5% from the same quarter in 2023. The estimate for global oil consumption for 2025 is 104.0 million b/d, an increase
of 1.1% over the 2024 estimate of 102.9 million b/d. OECD demand in 2025 is estimated to remain unchanged at 45.7 million b/d,
while non-OECD demand is estimated to increase by 1.9% to 58.3 million b/d.
Global oil production in the fourth quarter of 2024 was 102.9 million b/d, an increase of 0.1 million b/d from the fourth quarter of
2023. OPEC crude oil production averaged 26.7 million b/d in the fourth quarter of 2024, unchanged from the third quarter of 2024,
and an increase of 0.2 million b/d from the fourth quarter of 2023. Non-OPEC production increased by 0.1 million b/d to 70.6 million
b/d in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared with the fourth quarter of 2023. Oil production in the U.S. of 13.5 million b/d in the fourth
quarter of 2024 increased by 2.0% from the third quarter of 2024 and by 2.3% from the fourth quarter of 2023.
U.S. refinery throughput decreased by 0.4 million b/d to 16.5 million b/d in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared with the third quarter
of 2024. U.S. crude oil imports in the fourth quarter of 2024 increased by 0.2 million b/d to 6.4 million b/d compared with the fourth
quarter of 2023, with imports from OPEC countries increasing by 0.1 million b/d and imports from non-OPEC countries increasing by
0.1 million b/d.
China’s crude oil imports for 2024 decreased 1.9%, or 0.2 million b/d, to 11.0 million b/d, compared with 2023. Excluding years
impacted by COVID, this is the first annual decrease in Chinese crude oil imports in approximately 20 years.
OECD commercial crude inventories in the fourth quarter of 2024 decreased by 3.2%, or 43 million barrels, compared with the third
quarter of 2024. OECD commercial product inventories in the fourth quarter of 2024 increased by 1.7%, or 24 million barrels,
compared with the third quarter of 2024.
54
International Seaways, Inc.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, the tanker fleet of vessels over 10,000 dwt increased, net of vessels recycled, by 1.1 million dwt.
The crude fleet increased by 0.5 million dwt, with VLCCs decreasing by 0.6 million dwt and Suezmaxes and Aframaxes increasing by
0.6 million dwt and 0.5 million dwt, respectively. The product carrier fleet increased by 0.6 million dwt, all in the MR fleet. Year-
over-year, the size of the tanker fleet increased by 5.5 million dwt with the VLCCs decreasing by 0.6 million dwt and Suezmaxes,
Aframaxes, and MRs increasing by 1.1 million dwt, 2.5 million dwt, and 2.5 million dwt, respectively. The LR1/Panamax fleet
remained unchanged.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, the tanker orderbook increased by 2.9 million dwt overall compared with the third quarter of 2024.
The crude tanker orderbook increased by 1.7 million dwt. The VLCC orderbook increased by 1.8 million dwt and the Suezmax
orderbook decreased by 0.2 million dwt. The product carrier orderbook increased by 1.2 million dwt, with increases in the LR1 and
MR sectors of 0.5 million dwt and 0.7 million dwt respectively. Year-over-year, the total tanker orderbook increased by 45.2 million
dwt, with increases in VLCC, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, Panamaxes and LR1s of 18.8 million dwt, 5.5 million dwt, 8.3 million dwt, 2.6
million dwt and 10.0 million dwt, respectively.
Tanker rates in general held steady in the fourth quarter compared with the third quarter. VLCCs and Suezmaxes in particular saw
some weakness toward the end of the fourth quarter. In January, newly announced sanctions on dark fleet tankers created some
strength in these sectors, although it will take time to determine the actual impacts. The weaker Chinese economy remains an
impediment to stronger rates, and political uncertainty could have an impact on rates, either positive or negative. Even so, rates remain
significantly over cash breakeven levels, reflecting the continuing impact of the disruptions in trade flows on tanker demand.
RESULTS FROM VESSEL OPERATIONS
During 2024, income from vessel operations decreased by $160.2 million to $455.2 million from $615.4 million in 2023. Such
decrease resulted principally from a year-over-year decrease in TCE revenues and increased depreciation and amortization and vessel
expenses in the current year.
The decrease in TCE revenues in 2024 of $122.4 million, or 12%, to $933.1 million from $1,055.5 million in 2023 primarily reflects
(i) a net aggregate rates-based decrease of $103.6 million resulting from lower average daily rates in the Crude tanker and LR1 fleets,
partially offset by strengthened rates in the LR2 and MR sectors, and (ii) a $31.6 million days-based decline in the LR1 fleet due to a
smaller time chartered-in portfolio and 133 more off-hire days during the current year, partially offset by (iii) a $10.7 million days-
based increase in the VLCC fleet resulting from the delivery of three dual-fuel VLCC newbuilds between March 2023 and May 2023,
and (iv) a $5.7 million increase attributable to the Company’s Lightering business.
The following tables provide a quarterly trend analysis of spot TCE rates earned between the fourth quarter of 2023 and 2024 by our
Crude Tankers and Product Carriers fleet. See the “Operations and Oil Tanker Markets” discussion above for a description of the
market factors that impacted the quarterly trend of spot rates during 2024.
Spot Earnings for the Quarter Ended
Crude Tankers
December 31,
2023
March 31,
2024
June 30,
2024
September 30,
2024
December 31,
2024
VLCC:
Average rate
$
42,991
$
44,736
$
46,350
$
29,711
$
35,572
Revenue days
837
863
828
881
823
Suezmax:
Average rate
$
47,318
$
44,666
$
45,045
$
38,044
$
29,700
Revenue days
1,006
998
1,001
1,014
1,023
Aframax:
Average rate
$
43,952
$
40,913
$
31,450
$
25,119
$
31,212
Revenue days
256
222
190
186
276
55
International Seaways, Inc.
Spot Earnings for the Quarter Ended
Product Carriers
December 31,
2023
March 31,
2024
June 30,
2024
September 30,
2024
December 31,
2024
LR2
Average rate
$
43,666
$
51,027
$
55,485
$
—
$
—
Revenue days
92
91
58
—
—
LR1
Average rate
$
46,199
$
66,310
$
53,066
$
46,899
$
37,103
Revenue days
561
571
506
594
715
MR
Average rate
$
31,493
$
37,969
$
35,007
$
29,006
$
21,488
Revenue days
2,738
2,546
2,597
2,685
2,520
See Note 4, “Business and Segment Reporting,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information on the Company’s segments, including reconciliations of (i) time
charter equivalent revenues to shipping revenues and (ii) adjusted income from vessel operations for the segments to income before
income taxes, as reported in the consolidated statements of operations.
Crude Tankers
(Dollars in thousands, except daily rate amounts)
2024
2023
TCE revenues
$
437,095
$
512,220
Vessel expenses
(130,107)
(115,708)
Charter hire expenses
(14,322)
(11,870)
Depreciation and amortization
(80,988)
(76,877)
Adjusted income from vessel operations (a)
$
211,678
$
307,764
Average daily TCE rate
$
41,345
$
49,619
Average number of owned vessels (b)
21.0
20.0
Average number of vessels chartered-in under leases
9.1
9.2
Number of revenue days (c)
10,572
10,323
Number of ship-operating days (d)
Owned vessels
7,686
7,300
Vessels bareboat chartered-in under leases (e)
3,294
3,337
Vessels spot chartered-in under leases (f)
49
19
(a)
Adjusted income from vessel operations by segment is before general and administrative expenses, other operating expenses,
third-party debt modification fees and gain on disposal of vessels and other property, net of impairments.
(b) The average is calculated to reflect the addition and disposal of vessels during the period.
(c)
Revenue days represent ship-operating days less days that vessels were not available for employment due to repairs, drydock or
lay-up. Revenue days are weighted to reflect the Company’s interest in chartered-in vessels.
(d) Ship-operating days represent calendar days.
(e)
Represents VLCCs and Aframaxes that secured lease financing arrangements during the periods presented. Between March and
July 2023 the Company purchased the three remaining Aframaxes that it had been bareboat chartering-in under the purchase
options contained in such charters, and accordingly, such vessels are not included in this category for 2024.
(f)
Represents vessels spot chartered-in by the Company’s Crude Tankers Lightering business for full service lightering jobs.
The following table provides a breakdown of TCE rates achieved for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 between spot and
fixed earnings and the related revenue days. The information is based, in part, on information provided by the commercial pools in
which the segment’s vessels participate and excludes commercial pool fees/commissions averaging approximately $982 and $973 per
day in 2024 and 2023, respectively, as well as activity in the Crude Tankers Lightering business and revenue and revenue days for
56
International Seaways, Inc.
which recoveries were recorded by the Company under its loss of hire insurance policies. The fixed earnings rates in the table are net
of broker/address commissions.
2024
2023
Spot Earnings
Fixed Earnings
Spot Earnings
Fixed Earnings
VLCC:
Average rate
$
39,011
$
35,758
$
45,483
$
40,098
Revenue days
3,395
1,098
3,269
979
Suezmax:
Average rate
$
39,303
$
30,971
$
51,293
$
31,065
Revenue days
4,036
702
4,002
680
Aframax (1):
Average rate
$
32,433
$
38,518
$
46,841
$
38,566
Revenue days
873
365
1,182
164
(1) During 2024, one of the Company’s Aframaxes was employed on a transitional voyage in the spot market outside of its ordinary
course operations in the Aframax International Pool. Additionally, during 2023 one Aframax was employed on a transitional
voyage outside of the Dakota Tankers’ Aframax Pool. Such transitional voyages are excluded from the table above.
During 2024, TCE revenues for the Crude Tankers segment decreased by $75.1 million, or 15%, to $437.1 million from $512.2
million in 2023. Such decrease principally resulted from (i) an aggregate rates-based decrease in the VLCC, Suezmax and Aframax
fleets of $90.5 million due to lower average daily blended rates in these sectors and (ii) a $3.7 million days-based decrease in the
Aframax fleet, which reflected 87 more off-hire days in the current year. These decreases were partially offset by (iii) a $10.7 million
days-based increase in the VLCC fleet, which reflected the delivery of three dual-fuel LNG VLCC newbuilds between March 2023
and May 2023, partially offset by 80 more off-hire days in the current year, (iv) a $5.7 million increase in the Crude Tankers
Lightering business, and (v) a $2.7 million days-based increase in the Suezmax sector resulting from 45 fewer off-hire days in the
current year.
Vessel expenses increased by $14.4 million to $130.1 million in 2024 from $115.7 million in 2023. The VLCC newbuild deliveries
described above resulted in $3.2 million of incremental vessel expense in the current year. The remainder of the increase primarily
reflects increased costs for repairs and renewals, off-hire fuel, transportation and crew. Charter hire expenses increased by $2.5 million
to $14.3 million in 2024 from $11.9 million in 2023. The increase relates to the Crude Tankers Lightering business and reflects
incremental spot chartered-in Aframax days for full-service jobs and an increased rate on two of the workboats being chartered-in.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $4.1 million to $81.0 million in 2024 from $76.9 million in 2023 principally as a result of
$3.0 million relating to the commencement of depreciation on the Company’s three dual-fuel LNG VLCC newbuilds.
Excluding depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses, operating income for the Crude Tankers Lightering
business was $24.4 million for 2024 compared to $23.3 million for 2023. The increase reflects increased activity levels year-over-
year, with 459 service support only lighterings and six full-service lighterings being performed during 2024 compared to the 438
service support only lighterings and two full-service lightering that were performed during 2023.
57
International Seaways, Inc.
Product Carriers
(Dollars in thousands, except daily rate amounts)
2024
2023
TCE revenues
$
496,008
$
543,299
Vessel expenses
(145,554)
(143,831)
Charter hire expenses
(15,517)
(27,534)
Depreciation and amortization
(68,452)
(52,160)
Adjusted income from vessel operations
$
266,485
$
319,775
Average daily TCE rate
$
31,846
$
33,518
Average number of owned vessels
40.2
39.4
Average number of vessels chartered-in under leases
5.2
6.9
Number of revenue days
15,575
16,209
Number of ship-operating days
Owned vessels
14,714
14,384
Vessels bareboat chartered-in under leases (a)
1,464
1,644
Vessels time chartered-in under leases
457
876
(a)
Represents MRs that secured lease financing arrangements during 2024 and an LR2 and MRs that secured lease financing
arrangements during 2023.
The following table provides a breakdown of TCE rates achieved for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 between spot and
fixed earnings and the related revenue days. The information is based, in part, on information provided by the commercial pools in
which the segment’s vessels participate and excludes commercial pool fees/commissions averaging approximately $850 and $797 per
day in 2024 and 2023, respectively, as well as revenue and revenue days for which recoveries were recorded by the Company under its
loss of hire insurance policies. The fixed earnings rates in the table are net of broker/address commissions.
2024
2023
Spot Earnings
Fixed Earnings
Spot Earnings
Fixed Earnings
LR2 (1):
Average rate
$
53,159
$
39,500
$
35,842
$
18,588
Revenue days
149
161
225
140
LR1 (2):
Average rate
$
49,915
$
—
$
60,428
$
—
Revenue days
2,386
—
2,826
—
MR (3):
Average rate
$
30,887
$
21,809
$
29,479
$
21,040
Revenue days
10,348
2,391
11,615
1,210
(1) During 2023, the Company’s LR2 was employed on a transitional voyage in the spot market subsequent to the May 2023 expiry
of its time charter and prior to joining the Hafnia LR2 Pool in July 2023.
(2) In order to take advantage of market conditions and optimize economic performance, management employs all of the Company’s
LR1 product carriers, which operate in the Panamax International pool, exclusively in the transportation of crude oil cargoes.
During 2024 and 2023, two LR1s were employed on transitional voyages in the spot market outside of their ordinary course
operations in the Panamax International pool. Such transitional voyages are excluded from the table above.
(3) During 2024 and 2023, certain of the Company’s MRs were employed on transitional voyages in the spot market outside of their
ordinary course operations in commercial pools. Such transitional voyages are excluded from the table above.
During 2024, TCE revenues for the Product Carriers segment decreased by $47.3 million, or 9%, to $496.0 million from $543.3
million in 2023. The reduction in TCE revenues was primarily as a result of (i) a $31.6 million days-based decrease in the LR1 fleet
sector which reflects the impacts of a 419-day net decrease in time chartered-in days and 129 more off-hire days in the current year,
(ii) a $24.8 million rates-based decrease in the LR1 sector due to lower average daily rates earned in the current year, (iii) a $1.6
million days-based decrease in the LR2 fleet due to 57 more off-hire days in the current year, and (iv) a $1.0 million days-based
decrease in the MR sector, which reflects an increase of 179 off-hire days in the current year, significantly offset by 139 more owned
vessel days in the current year. The increase in owned vessel days reflects the Company’s acquisition of six MRs between April 2024
58
International Seaways, Inc.
and May 2024, partially offset by the sales of six MRs between March 2023 and July 2024. Partially offsetting the TCE decreases
described above was a $11.9 million aggregate rates-based increase in the MR and LR2 sectors due to higher average blended rates in
the current year.
Vessel expenses during 2024 increased by $1.7 million to $145.6 million from $143.8 million in 2023. Such increase principally
reflects higher LR1 drydock deviation costs, partially offset by a decrease in spares and repair costs in the MR fleet. Charter hire
expenses decreased by $12.0 million to $15.5 million in 2024 from $27.5 million in 2023 primarily as a result of the year-over-year
decrease in time chartered-in LR1 days described above. Depreciation and amortization increased by $16.3 million to $68.5 million in
the current year from $52.2 million in the prior year. Such increase resulted from increased drydock amortization and the MR
purchases and sales referenced above, as the acquired vessels have higher cost bases than the older vessels that were sold.
General and Administrative Expenses
During 2024, general and administrative expenses increased by $5.1 million to $52.6 million from $47.5 million in 2023. The primary
drivers were comprised of (i) increased compensation and benefits costs of $1.8 million, $0.5 million of which relates to non-cash
stock compensation, and an additional $0.5 million of which relates to the termination of a legacy retiree medical benefits plan, (ii)
higher legal fees of $1.4 million, which were principally incurred in connection with a commercial dispute, (iii) $0.6 million of
incremental IT spend, and (iv) increased travel and entertainment expense of $0.4 million. See Note 19, “Contingencies”, to the
accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional
information relating to the commercial dispute referenced above.
Other Operating Expenses
See Note 17, “Other Operating Expenses,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information on these expenses.
Other Income
Other income was $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared with $10.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2023. The current year includes $9.9 million of interest income compared to interest income of $13.9 million earned during 2023.The
year-over-year decrease reflects the impact of a lower average balance of invested cash during 2024, attributable to the significant
deleveraging initiatives completed during 2023, as well as a decrease in interest rates in anticipation of the Federal Reserve’s move to
cut rates in the second half of 2024. The interest income in 2023 was partially offset by a $1.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt
and a $2.7 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs. See Note 9, “Debt,” to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information. The 2024 and 2023 periods
also reflect net actuarial gains and currency gains or losses associated with the Company’s retirement benefit obligation in the United
Kingdom. See Note 18, “Other Income,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information.
Interest Expense
The components of interest expense are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Interest before items shown below
$
57,962
$
77,912
Interest cost on defined benefit pension obligation and other interest costs
787
982
Impact of interest rate hedge derivatives
(7,705)
(10,750)
Capitalized interest
(1,341)
(2,385)
Interest expense
$
49,703
$
65,759
Interest expense decreased in 2024 compared to 2023 as a result of (i) a reduction in the average outstanding principal balance under
the $750 Million Term Loan Facility (which was amended and extended in April 2024), (ii) the repayment in full of the COSCO
Lease financing in July 2023 and (iii) the repayment in full of the ING Credit Facility in April 2024, partially offset by post-delivery
59
International Seaways, Inc.
interest expense related to the BoComm Lease Financing. See Note 9, “Debt,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements
as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information on the Company’s debt facilities.
Income Tax Benefit/(Provision)
We qualified for an exemption pursuant to Section 883, or the “Section 883 exemption,” of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, or the “Code,” for the tax year ended December 31, 2024. We will qualify for the Section 883 exemption for 2025 and
forward if, among other things, (i) our common shares are treated as primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market
in the United States or another qualified country (“publicly traded test”), or (ii) we satisfy one of two other ownership tests. Under
applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, the publicly traded test will not be satisfied in any taxable year in which persons who directly,
indirectly or constructively own five percent or more of our common shares (sometimes referred to as “5% shareholders”) own in the
aggregate 50% or more of the vote and value of our common shares for more than half the days in such year, unless an exception
applies. We can provide no assurance that ownership of our common shares by 5% shareholders will allow us to qualify for the
Section 883 exemption in future taxable years. If we do not qualify for the Section 883 exemption, our gross shipping income derived
from U.S. sources, i.e., 50% of our gross shipping income attributable to transportation beginning or ending in the United States (but
not both beginning and ending in the United States), generally would be subject to a U.S. federal income tax of four percent without
allowance for deductions.
The Company reviews its freight tax obligations on a regular basis and may update its assessment of its tax positions based on
available information at that time. Such information may include additional legal advice as to the applicability of freight taxes in
relevant jurisdictions. Freight tax regulations are subject to change and interpretation; therefore, the amounts recorded by the
Company may change accordingly. During 2024 the Company decreased its reserve for uncertain tax liabilities for various
jurisdictions by $1.1 million compared to a $3.6 million increase in such reserves during 2023.
See Note 11, “Taxes,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data,” for further details on the income tax benefit/(provision) line.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. Adjusted EBITDA
consists of EBITDA adjusted for the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented to provide investors with meaningful additional information that management uses to
monitor ongoing operating results and evaluate trends over comparative periods. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent,
and should not be considered a substitute for, net income or cash flows from operations determined in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for
analysis of our results reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations are:
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or
contractual commitments;
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service
interest or principal payments, on our debt.
While EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are frequently used by companies as a measure of operating results and performance, neither
of those items as prepared by the Company is necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to
differences in methods of calculation.
60
International Seaways, Inc.
The following table reconciles net income, as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations set forth in Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data,” to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Net income
$
416,724
$
556,446
Income tax (benefit)/provision
(1,084)
3,878
Interest expense
49,703
65,759
Depreciation and amortization
149,440
129,038
EBITDA
614,783
755,121
Third-party debt modification fees
168
568
Gain on disposal of vessels and assets, net of impairments
(32,657)
(35,934)
Provision for settlement of multi-employer pension plan obligations
1,019
—
Write-off of deferred financing costs
—
2,686
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—
1,323
Adjusted EBITDA
$
583,313
$
723,764
61
International Seaways, Inc.
LIQUIDITY AND SOURCES OF CAPITAL
Our business is capital intensive. Our ability to successfully implement our strategy is dependent on the continued availability of
capital on attractive terms. In addition, our ability to successfully operate our business to meet near-term and long-term debt
repayment obligations is dependent on maintaining sufficient liquidity.
Liquidity
As of December 31, 2024, we had total liquidity on a consolidated basis of $632.2 million comprised of $157.5 million of cash and
$474.7 million of undrawn revolver capacity.
Working capital at December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $245.4 million and $269.5 million, respectively. Current assets are highly liquid,
consisting principally of cash, interest-bearing deposits, short-term investments, which are time deposits with original maturities of
between 91 and 180 days, and receivables. Current liabilities include current installments of long-term debt of $50.1 million and
$127.4 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The Company’s total cash increased by $30.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase principally reflects:
$547.1 million of cash provided by operating activities;
$71.9 million in net proceeds from the disposal of vessels and other assets;
$60.0 million in net proceeds from maturities of short term time deposits; and
$50.0 million in net borrowings under the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility.
Such cash inflows were partially offset by:
$309.4 million for cash dividends paid to shareholders and for share buybacks;
$280.2 million in expenditures for vessels and other property, including the purchase of two 2014-built and five 2015-built
MRs;
$68.8 million in regularly scheduled principal amortization of the Company’s secured debt facilities and lease financing
arrangements; and
$20.3 million of principal prepayment of the ING Credit Facility.
Our cash and cash equivalents balances generally exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. We place our cash and
cash equivalents in what we believe to be credit-worthy financial institutions. In addition, certain of our money market accounts invest
in U.S. Treasury securities or other obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies, floating rate and variable
demand notes of U.S. and foreign corporations, commercial paper rated in the highest category by Moody’s Investor Services and
Standard & Poor’s, certificates of deposit and time deposits, asset-backed securities, and repurchase agreements.
As of December 31, 2024, we had total debt outstanding (net of original issue discount and deferred financing costs) of $688.4 million
and a net debt to total capitalization of 22.2%, which compares with 23.8% at December 31, 2023.
Sources, Uses and Management of Capital
During 2024, we have (i) used incremental liquidity generated from operations and the proceeds from disposal of older tonnage at
strong prices to invest in renewing and growing the fleet, (ii) enhanced our balance sheet and liquidity position, and (iii) continued to
make substantial returns to shareholders.
In addition to future operating cash flows, our other future sources of funds are proceeds from issuances of equity securities, additional
borrowings as permitted under our loan agreements and proceeds from the opportunistic sales of our vessels. Our current uses of funds
are to fund working capital requirements, maintain the quality of our vessels, purchase vessels, pay newbuilding construction costs,
comply with international shipping standards and environmental laws and regulations, repay or repurchase our outstanding loan
facilities, pay a regular quarterly cash dividend, and from time-to-time, repurchase shares of our common stock and pay supplemental
cash dividends.
62
International Seaways, Inc.
The following is a summary of the significant capital allocation initiatives we executed during 2024 and the sources of capital we have
at our disposal for future use as well as our current commitments for future uses of capital:
During 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared and paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $284.4
million or $5.77 per share as follows:
Declaration Date
Record Date
Payment Date
Regular Quarterly
Dividend per Share
Supplemental
Dividend per Share
Total Dividends Paid
February 28, 2024
March 14, 2024
March 28, 2024
$0.12
$1.20
$64.7 million
May 7, 2024
June 12, 2024
June 26, 2024
$0.12
$1.63
$86.9 million
August 6, 2024
September 11, 2024
September 25, 2024
$0.12
$1.38
$73.8 million
November 6, 2024
December 13, 2024
December 27, 2024
$0.12
$1.08
$59.0 million
Also on February 26, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of
common stock and a supplemental dividend of $0.58 per share of common stock. Both dividends will be paid on March 28, 2025 to
stockholders of record as of March 14, 2025.
During 2024, the Company repurchased and retired 501,646 shares of its common stock in open-market purchases, at an average price
of $49.81 per share, for a total cost of $25.0 million. In November 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in
the share repurchase program to $50.0 million from $25.0 million. The expiry date of the stock repurchase program is on December
31, 2025.
In continuation of our strategic fleet optimization program during 2024, we:
Entered into agreements for the en bloc purchase of four 2015-built and two 2014-built MR Product Carriers for an aggregate
purchase price of 232 million. Eighty-five percent of the purchase price consideration was funded from available liquidity
and the balance of 15% with the issuance of common stock. All of the six vessels were delivered during the second quarter of
2024. An automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 was filed with the SEC on April 29, 2024 that, in connection
with prospectus supplements filed during the second quarter of 2024, registered the aggregate 623,778 shares that were
issued in conjunction with these vessel acquisitions and facilitated the seller’s ability to offer and sell or otherwise dispose of
the shares of common stock issued to them under this transaction.
Declared options to build two additional dual-fuel ready LNG 73,600 dwt LR1 Product Carriers at the same shipyard where
our other four newbuild LR1s were contracted. The six LR1s are contracted for delivery beginning in the second half of 2025
through the third quarter of 2026 for an aggregate cost of approximately $359 million, which will be paid for through a
combination of long-term financing and available liquidity.
Entered into agreements for the sale of one 2009-built MR and two 2008-built MRs for aggregate net proceeds of
approximately $72 million after fees and commissions. The vessels were delivered to their buyers between the second and
third quarters of 2024 and we recognized total gains on the sale of approximately $41.3 million.
Entered into memoranda of agreements with the same counterparty for the sale of one 2010-built VLCC and one 2011-built
VLCC for an aggregate sales price of $116.6 million and the purchase of three 2015-built MRs for an aggregate purchase
price of $119.5 million. The Company closed on all five transactions between December 2024 and February 2025, with a net
cash outflow of $2.9 million representing the difference in value between the five vessels.
Further building on our liquidity enhancing, deleveraging and financing diversification initiatives, we executed the following
transactions:
On April 18, 2024, we prepaid the $20.3 million outstanding principal balance under the ING Credit Facility;
On April 26, 2024, we entered into an agreement to amend and extend our existing $750 Million Credit Facility, under which
the Company had a remaining term loan balance of $94.6 million and undrawn revolver capacity of $257.4 million at March
63
International Seaways, Inc.
31, 2024. The new agreement consists of a $500 million revolving credit facility (the “$500 Million Revolving Credit
Facility”) that matures in January 2030. Under the terms of the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility, capacity is reduced
on a quarterly basis by approximately $12.8 million each quarter, based on a 20-year age-adjusted profile of the collateral
vessels. The $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility bears an interest rate based on term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin
(each as defined in the credit agreement). The Applicable Margin is 1.85% and is subject to similar sustainability-linked
features as included in the $750 Million Credit Facility, that are aimed at reducing the carbon footprint, targeting
expenditures toward energy efficiency improvements and maintaining a safety record above the industry average. The
Company’s performance against these sustainability measures could impact the margin by five basis points. At the time of
closing, after $94.6 million was drawn on the new revolver, our overall undrawn revolver capacity increased by $148 million
to $559.4 million. As of December 31, 2024, the undrawn revolver capacity under this facility was $329.8 million.
By entering into the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility we have (i) eliminated $19.5 million in mandatory quarterly debt
repayments since the balance drawn on closing is not required to be repaid until Maturity, (ii) reduced cash break evens by
over $3,000 per day, (iii) extended the maturity profile of the facility from 2027 to 2030, and (iv) reduced future interest
expense through a margin reduction of over 85 basis points.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company has contractual commitments for the construction of six dual-fuel ready LR1s, and the
purchase and installation of one ballast water treatment system and five mewis ducts, the final outstanding installment payments due
for four ballast water treatment systems that were installed prior to December 31, 2024, and the purchase and installation of various
performance efficiency devices for the fleet. The Company’s debt service commitments and aggregate purchase commitments for
vessel construction and betterments as of December 31, 2024, are presented in the Aggregate Contractual Obligations Table below.
Outlook
Our strong balance sheet, as evidenced by a substantial level of liquidity, 35 unencumbered vessels (excluding the six LR1s under
construction) as of December 31, 2024, and diversified financing sources with debt maturities spread out between 2030 and 2031,
positions us to support our operations over the next twelve months as we continue to advance our vessel employment strategy, which
seeks to achieve an optimal mix of spot (voyage charter) and long-term (time charter) charters. Our balance sheet strength and
balanced fleet position us to continue pursuing our disciplined capital allocation strategy of fleet renewal, incremental debt reduction
and returns to shareholders and pursue potential strategic opportunities that may arise within the diverse sectors in which we operate.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
A summary of the Company’s long-term contractual obligations as of December 31, 2024 follows:
Beyond
(Dollars in thousands)
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2029
Total
$500 Million Revolving Credit Facility(1)
$
7,831
9,024
10,367
10,109
9,745
145,911
$
192,987
$160 Million Revolving Credit Facility(2)
983
898
811
730
161
—
3,583
Ocean Yield Lease Financing - floating
rate(3)
52,559
50,998
48,372
45,864
43,117
147,843
388,753
BoComm Lease Financing - fixed rate(4)
23,762
23,762
23,762
23,827
23,762
142,272
261,147
Toshin Lease Financing - fixed rate(4)
2,160
2,160
2,151
2,223
2,052
4,881
15,627
Hyuga Lease Financing - fixed rate(4)
2,232
2,232
2,232
2,160
2,160
4,256
15,272
Kaiyo Lease Financing - fixed rate(4)
2,250
2,410
2,214
2,214
2,214
2,127
13,429
Kaisha Lease Financing - fixed rate(4)
2,438
2,225
2,214
2,214
2,214
2,287
13,592
Operating lease obligations(5)
Time Charter-ins
18,618
2,563
—
—
—
—
21,181
Office and other space
1,093
1,113
1,077
1,077
1,077
3,678
9,115
Vessel and vessel betterment
commitments(6)
138,483
188,480
—
—
—
—
326,963
Total
$ 252,409
$ 285,865
$
93,200
$
90,418
$
86,502
$ 453,255
$ 1,261,649
64
International Seaways, Inc.
(1) Amounts shown include contractual interest obligations of floating rate debt estimated based on the applicable margin for the
$500 Million Revolving Credit Facility of 1.85%, plus the fixed rate stated in the related interest rate swaps of 2.84%.
(2) Amounts shown include unused revolver capacity commitment fees and contractual interest obligations, if any, of floating rate
debt estimated based on the applicable margin for the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility of 1.975%.
(3) Amounts shown include contractual interest obligations on $282.6 million of outstanding floating rate debt estimated based on the
applicable margin for the Ocean Yield Lease Financing of 4.05% plus 0.26% of credit adjustment spread and the fixed rate stated
in the interest rate swaps (assigned for accounting purposes) of 2.84% on $83.6 million of notional principal amount outstanding
and the effective three-month SOFR rate as of December 31, 2024 of 4.55% for the remaining outstanding principal under the
Ocean Yield Lease Financing.
(4) Amounts shown include contractual implicit interest obligations of the lease financing under the bareboat charters.
(5) As of December 31, 2024, the Company had charter-in commitments for two vessels on leases that are accounted for as operating
leases. The full amounts due under office and other space leases and the lease component of the amounts due under long term
time charter-ins are discounted and reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as lease liabilities with corresponding
right of use asset balances.
(6) Represents the Company’s commitments for the purchase and installation of one ballast water treatment systems and five mewis
duct systems, the final outstanding installment payments due for four ballast water treatment systems that were installed prior to
December 31, 2024, and the purchase and installation of various performance efficiency devices for the fleet, and the remaining
commitments for the construction of six dual-fuel ready LR1s.
Carrying Value of Vessels
At December 31, 2024, 41 of the Company’s 76 owned and bareboat chartered-in vessels were pledged as collateral under certain of
the Company’s debt and lease financing facilities. The following table presents information with respect to the carrying amount of the
Company’s vessels by type. Instances in which the fair market values of the Company’s vessels, which are estimated by a third-party
vessel appraiser, are below their carrying values as of December 31, 2024, are indicated in the footnote(s) to the table. The carrying
value of each of the Company’s vessels does not necessarily represent its fair market value or the amount that could be obtained if the
vessel were sold. The Company’s estimates of market values for its vessels assume that the vessels are all in good and seaworthy
condition without need for repair and, if inspected, would be certified as being in class without notations. In addition, because vessel
values are highly volatile, these estimates may not be indicative of either the current or future prices that the Company could achieve
if it were to sell any of the vessels. The Company would not record a loss for any of the vessels for which the fair market value is
below its carrying value unless and until the Company either determines to sell the vessel for a loss or determines that the vessel is
impaired as discussed below in “Critical Accounting Policies — Vessel Impairment.” The Company believes that the future
undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned over the estimated remaining useful lives for those vessels that have experienced
declines in market values below their carrying values would exceed such vessels’ carrying values.
Footnotes to the following table exclude those vessels with an estimated market value in excess of their carrying value.
(Dollars in thousands)
Average Vessel
Age (weighted
by dwt)
Number of
Vessels
Carrying Value
Crude Tankers
VLCC
8.8
13
$
846,115
Suezmax
10.8
13
371,516
Aframax
12.8
4
90,777
Total Crude Tankers
9.7
30
$
1,308,408
Product Carriers
LR2
10.4
1
$
46,848
LR1
15.6
6
85,067
MR
14.2
39
605,660
Total Product Carriers(1)
14.3
46
$
737,575
Fleet total
11.0
76
$
2,045,983
65
International Seaways, Inc.
(1) As of December 31, 2024, the Product Carriers segment includes seven MRs with aggregate carrying value of $266.5 million,
which the Company believes exceeds their aggregate market values of approximately $259.7 million by $6.8 million.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, which could impact its results of operations and financial
condition. The Company manages this exposure to market risk through its regular operating and financing activities and, when
deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. To manage its interest rate risk exposure associated with
changes in variable interest rate payments due on its credit facilities in a cost-effective manner, the Company, from time-to-time,
enters into interest rate swap, collar or cap agreements, in which it agrees to exchange various combinations of fixed and variable
interest rates based on agreed upon notional amounts or to receive payments if floating interest rates rise above a specified cap rate.
The Company uses such derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for speculative or trading purposes. In
addition, derivative financial instruments are entered into with a diversified group of major financial institutions in order to manage
exposure to nonperformance on such instruments by the counterparties.
See “Interest Rate Sensitivity” section below and Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivative and Fair Value
Disclosures,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,”
for additional information on the Company various interest rate derivatives.
Currency and exchange rate risk
The shipping industry’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. All of the Company’s revenues and most of its operating costs are in
U.S. dollars. The Company incurs certain operating expenses, such as some vessel and general and administrative expenses, in
currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, and the foreign exchange risk associated with these operating expenses is immaterial. If foreign
exchange risk becomes material in the future, the Company may seek to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates
through the use of short-term currency forward contracts and through the purchase of bulk quantities of currencies at rates that
management considers favorable. For contracts which qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, hedge effectiveness would
be assessed based on changes in foreign exchange spot rates with the change in fair value of the effective portions being recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss).
Fuel price volatility risk
The Company has installed scrubbers on ten VLCCs and two of its Suezmaxes. During 2024, the average price differential between
very low sulfur fuel and high sulfur fuel in Singapore and Fujairah, the most common bunkering locations for VLCCs, was
approximately $130 per ton. Assuming a VLCC bunker consumption rate of 50 metric tons per day, this translated to approximately
$6,500 per day per vessel in lower bunker consumption costs on our VLCCs during 2024. In addition to installing scrubbers on certain
of the larger vessels in the Company’s fleet, significant consideration continues to be given to other ways of managing the risk of
volatility in the price spread between high-sulfur fuel and low-sulfur fuel as well as the risk of limited supply of compliant fuel or
HFO along the routes that the Company’s vessels typically travel.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had lease financings and revolving credit facilities under which borrowings bear interest at a
rate based on SOFR, plus the applicable margin, as stated in the respective financing arrangements. The Company has entered into
interest rate swaps agreements with major financial institutions covering for accounting purposes 100% of the $500 Million Revolving
Credit Facility outstanding balance of $144.6 million as of December 31, 2024, and $83.6 million of the notional principal amount
outstanding under the Ocean Yield Lease Financing that effectively converts the Company’s interest rate exposure from a three-month
SOFR floating rate to a fixed rate of 2.84% through the maturity date of February 22, 2027.
The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For
debt obligations, the table presents the principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates of
the Company’s debt obligations.
66
International Seaways, Inc.
Principal (Notional) Amount (dollars in millions) by Expected Maturity and Average Interest (Swap) Rate
Beyond
Fair Value at
(Dollars in millions)
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2029
Total
Dec. 31, 2024
Liabilities
Debt
Fixed rate debt
$
20.9
$
21.9
$
22.8
$
23.9
$
24.9
$
153.3
$
267.6
$
233.0
Average interest rate
4.57%
4.54%
4.51%
4.47%
4.42%
5.07%
Variable rate debt (1)
$
29.2
$
29.2
$
29.2
$
29.3
$
29.2
$
281.1
$
427.2
$
427.2
Average interest rate (1)
7.33%
7.66%
7.84%
7.74%
7.61%
8.99%
(1) Rates are discussed in the aggregate contractual obligations section above.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, which require the Company to make estimates in the application of its accounting policies based on the best
assumptions, judgments, and opinions of management. Following is a discussion of the accounting policies that involve a higher
degree of judgment and the methods of their application. For a description of all of the Company’s material accounting policies, see
Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8,
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Vessel Lives and Salvage Values
The carrying value of each of the Company’s vessels represents its original cost at the time it was delivered or purchased less
depreciation calculated using an estimated useful life of 25 years from the date such vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard.
A vessel’s carrying value is reduced to its new cost basis (i.e., its current fair value) if a vessel impairment charge is recorded.
If the estimated useful lives assigned to the Company’s vessels prove to be shorter than previously estimated because of new
regulations, an extended period of weak markets, the broad imposition of age restrictions by the Company’s customers, or other future
events, it could result in higher depreciation expense and impairment losses in future periods related to a reduction in the useful lives
of any affected vessels.
Company management estimates the steel recycle value of all of its vessels to be $300 per lightweight ton consistent with its
commitment to implement and practice environmentally and socially responsible ship recycling. The Company’s assumptions used in
the determination of estimated salvage value take into account current steel recycling prices, the historic pattern of annual average
steel recycling rates over the five years ended December 31, 2024, which ranged from $270 to $670 per lightweight ton, estimated
changes in future market demand for recycled steel and estimated future demand for vessels. Steel recycling prices also fluctuate
depending upon type of ship, bunkers on board, spares on board and delivery range. Market conditions that could influence the
volume and pricing of vessel recycling activity in 2025 and beyond include (i) the combined impact of scheduled newbuild deliveries
and charter rate expectations for vessels potentially facing age restrictions imposed by oil majors, (ii) the impact of ballast water
treatment systems regulatory requirements or proposals, (iii) costs and timing of pending special surveys, which are likely to be
expensive for vessels over 15 years of age, and (iv) IMO requirements for the use of low-sulfur fuels and other carbon reduction
initiatives. These factors will influence owners’ decisions to accelerate the disposal of older vessels, especially those with upcoming
special surveys.
Although management believes that the assumptions used to determine the steel recycling value for its vessels are reasonable and
appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective, in part, because of the cyclicality of the nature of future demand for recycled
steel.
67
International Seaways, Inc.
Vessel Impairment
The carrying values of the Company’s vessels may not represent their fair market value or the amount that could be obtained by
selling the vessel at any point in time since the market prices of second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and
the cost of newbuildings. Historically, both charter rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical. Management evaluates the carrying
amounts of vessels held and used by the Company for impairment only when it determines that it will sell a vessel or when events or
changes in circumstances occur that cause management to believe that future cash flows for any individual vessel will be less than its
carrying value. In such instances, an impairment charge would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the vessel and its eventual disposition is less than the vessel’s carrying amount. This assessment is
made at the individual vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available.
In developing estimates of future cash flows, the Company must make assumptions about future performance, with significant
assumptions being related to charter rates, operating expenses, utilization, drydocking and capital expenditure requirements, residual
value and the estimated remaining useful lives of the vessels. These assumptions are based on historical trends as well as future
expectations. Specifically, in estimating future charter rates, management takes into consideration rates currently in effect for existing
time charters and estimated daily time charter equivalent rates for each vessel class for the unfixed days over the estimated remaining
lives of each of the vessels. The estimated daily time charter equivalent rates used for unfixed days are based on a combination of
(i) rates as forecasted by third-party analysts, and (ii) trailing historical average rates, based on monthly average rates published by a
third-party maritime research service. Management determines the historical periods to utilize in its estimations based on its judgment
of current, past, and ongoing shipping cycles. Recognizing that the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products is cyclical and
subject to significant volatility based on factors beyond the Company’s control, management believes the use of estimates based on
the combination of rates forecasted by third-party analysts and historical average rates calculated as of the reporting date to be
reasonable.
Estimated outflows for operating expenses and capital expenditures and drydocking requirements are based on historical and budgeted
costs and are adjusted for assumed inflation. Utilization is based on historical levels achieved and estimates of residual value for
recycling are based upon the pattern of steel recycling rates used in management’s evaluation of salvage value for purposes of
recording depreciation. Finally, for vessels that are being considered for disposal before the end of their respective useful lives, the
Company utilizes weighted probabilities assigned to the possible outcomes for such vessels being sold or recycled before the end of
their respective useful lives.
The determination of fair value is highly judgmental. In estimating the fair value of INSW’s vessels for purposes of Step 2 of the
impairment tests, the Company considers the market and income approaches by using a combination of third-party appraisals and
discounted cash flow models prepared by the Company. In preparing the discounted cash flow models, the Company uses a
methodology consistent with the methodology discussed above in relation to the undiscounted cash flow models prepared by the
Company and discounts the cash flows using its current estimate of INSW’s weighted average cost of capital.
The more significant factors that could impact management’s assumptions regarding time charter equivalent rates include (i) loss or
reduction in business from significant customers, (ii) unanticipated changes in demand for transportation of crude oil and petroleum
products, (iii) changes in production of or demand for oil and petroleum products, generally or in particular regions, (iv) greater than
anticipated levels of tanker newbuilding orders or lower than anticipated levels of tanker recycling, and (v) changes in rules and
regulations applicable to the tanker industry, including legislation adopted by international organizations such as IMO and the EU or
by individual countries. Although management believes that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and
appropriate at the time they were made, such assumptions are highly subjective and likely to change, possibly materially, in the future.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Risk Management” and “—
Interest Rate Sensitivity.”
68
International Seaways, Inc.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Page
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2024 and 2023
69
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
70
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
71
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
72
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
73
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
74
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP, New York, NY, Auditor Firm ID:42)
115
69
International Seaways, Inc.
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AT DECEMBER 31
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
157,506
$
126,760
Short-term investments
—
60,000
Voyage receivables, net of allowance for credit losses of $86 and $191,
including unbilled of $181,211 and $237,298
185,521
247,165
Other receivables
13,771
14,303
Inventories
1,875
1,329
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
15,570
10,342
Current portion of derivative asset
2,080
5,081
Total Current Assets
376,323
464,980
Vessels and other property, less accumulated depreciation
2,050,211
1,914,426
Vessels construction in progress
37,020
11,670
Deferred drydock expenditures, net
90,209
70,880
Operating lease right-of-use assets
21,229
20,391
Pool working capital deposits
35,372
31,748
Long-term derivative assets
801
1,153
Other assets
25,232
6,571
Total Assets
$
2,636,397
$
2,521,819
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
$
66,264
$
57,904
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
14,617
10,223
Current installments of long-term debt
50,054
127,447
Total Current Liabilities
130,935
195,574
Long-term operating lease liabilities
8,715
11,631
Long-term debt, net
638,353
595,229
Other liabilities
2,346
2,628
Total Liabilities
780,349
805,062
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Capital - 100,000,000 no par value shares authorized; 49,194,458 and 48,925,562
shares issued and outstanding
1,504,767
1,490,986
Retained earnings
359,142
226,834
1,863,909
1,717,820
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(7,861)
(1,063)
Total Equity
1,856,048
1,716,757
Total Liabilities and Equity
$
2,636,397
$
2,521,819
See notes to consolidated financial statements
70
International Seaways, Inc.
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS
2024
2023
2022
Shipping Revenues:
Pool revenues, including $273,761, $313,873 and $210,409
from affiliated companies accounted for by the equity method
$
749,164 $
905,808 $
774,922
Time and bareboat charter revenues
137,119
96,544
33,034
Voyage charter revenues
65,330
69,423
56,709
951,613
1,071,775
864,665
Operating Expenses:
Voyage expenses
18,510
16,256
10,955
Vessel expenses
275,661
259,539
240,674
Charter hire expenses
29,839
39,404
32,132
Depreciation and amortization
149,440
129,038
110,388
General and administrative
52,607
47,473
46,351
Other operating expenses
2,820
—
—
Third-party debt modification fees
168
568
1,158
Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets, net of impairments
(32,657)
(35,934)
(19,647)
Total operating expenses
496,388
456,344
422,011
Income from vessel operations
455,225
615,431
442,654
Equity in income of affiliated companies
—
—
714
Operating income
455,225
615,431
443,368
Other income
10,118
10,652
2,332
Income before interest expense and income taxes
465,343
626,083
445,700
Interest expense
(49,703)
(65,759)
(57,721)
Income before income taxes
415,640
560,324
387,979
Income tax benefit/(provision)
1,084
(3,878)
(88)
Net income
$
416,724 $
556,446 $
387,891
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic
49,270,496
48,978,452
49,381,459
Diluted
49,680,127
49,428,967
49,844,904
Per Share Amounts:
Basic net income per share
$
8.45 $
11.35 $
7.85
Diluted net income per share
$
8.38 $
11.25 $
7.77
See notes to consolidated financial statements
71
International Seaways, Inc.
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
2024
2023
2022
Net income
$
416,724
$
556,446
$
387,891
Other comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax:
Net change in unrealized (losses)/gains on cash flow hedges
(4,173)
(7,563)
21,775
Defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
Net change in unrecognized prior service costs
(339)
(59)
(335)
Net change in unrecognized actuarial losses
(2,286)
(405)
(2,116)
Other comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax
(6,798)
(8,027)
19,324
Comprehensive income
$
409,926
$
548,419
$
407,215
See notes to consolidated financial statements
72
International Seaways, Inc.
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
2024
2023
2022
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income
$
416,724 $
556,446 $
387,891
Items included in net income not affecting cash flows:
Depreciation and amortization
149,440
129,038
110,388
Loss on write-down of vessels and other assets
8,700
—
1,697
Amortization of debt discount and other deferred financing costs
4,110
5,623
5,224
Amortization of time charter hire contracts acquired
—
—
842
Deferred financing costs write-off
—
2,686
1,266
Stock compensation
9,000
8,518
6,746
Earnings of affiliated companies
(241)
20
(10,297)
Other – net
(312)
(2,562)
(2,242)
Items included in net income related to investing and financing activities:
Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets, net
(41,357)
(35,934)
(21,344)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—
1,323
—
Loss on sale of investment in affiliated companies
—
—
9,513
Cash distributions from affiliated companies
—
—
3,111
Payments for drydocking
(58,642)
(34,539)
(43,327)
Insurance claims proceeds related to vessel operations
1,073
3,156
5,301
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease/(increase) in receivables
61,644
42,610
(182,679)
Increase in deferred revenue
1,590
3,283
2,609
Purchase of insurance contract in connection with settlement of pension plan obligations
(3,649)
—
—
Net change in inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets and
accounts payable, accrued expense, and other current and long-term liabilities
(942)
8,734
13,102
Net cash provided by operating activities
547,138
688,402
287,801
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Expenditures for vessels, vessel improvements and vessels under construction, including deposits for acquisitions
(278,794)
(205,159)
(115,976)
Security deposits for vessel exchange transactions
(5,000)
—
—
Proceeds from disposal of vessels and other assets
71,895
66,002
99,157
Expenditures for other property
(1,386)
(1,471)
(710)
Pool working capital deposits
(1,732)
(3,639)
1,362
Proceeds from sale of investment in affiliated companies
—
—
138,966
Investments in short-term time deposits
(125,000)
(235,000)
(105,000)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term time deposits
185,000
255,000
25,000
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities
(155,017)
(124,267)
42,799
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings on long term debt, net of lenders' fees
—
—
641,050
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities
120,000
50,000
—
Repayments on revolving credit facilities
(70,000)
(50,000)
—
Repayments of debt
(39,851)
(382,050)
(798,740)
Premium and fees on extinguishment of debt
—
(1,323)
—
Proceeds from sale and leaseback financing, net of issuance and deferred financing costs
—
169,717
108,005
Payments on sale and leaseback financing and finance lease
(49,294)
(135,965)
(39,240)
Payments of deferred financing costs
(5,759)
(3,577)
(909)
Cash dividends paid
(284,416)
(308,154)
(69,841)
Repurchases of common stock
(25,000)
(13,948)
(20,017)
Cash paid to tax authority upon vesting or exercise of stock-based compensation
(7,055)
(5,819)
(6,097)
Net cash used in financing activities
(361,375)
(681,119)
(185,789)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
30,746
(116,984)
144,811
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
126,760
243,744
98,933
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
157,506 $
126,760 $
243,744
See notes to consolidated financial statements
73
International Seaways, Inc.
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
Retained
Accumulated
Earnings /
Other
(Accumulated
Comprehensiv
e
Noncontrollin
g
Capital
Deficit)
Income/(Loss)
Interests
Total
Balance at January 1, 2022
$ 1,591,446 $
(409,338)$
(12,360)$
584 $ 1,170,332
Net income
—
387,891
—
—
387,891
Other comprehensive income
—
—
19,324
—
19,324
Dividends declared
(69,843)
—
—
—
(69,843)
Impact of deconsolidating DASM
—
—
—
(584)
(584)
Forfeitures of vested restricted stock awards and exercised stock
options
(6,097)
—
—
—
(6,097)
Compensation relating to restricted stock awards
1,175
—
—
—
1,175
Compensation relating to restricted stock units awards
4,583
—
—
—
4,583
Compensation relating to stock option awards
988
—
—
—
988
Repurchase of common stock
(20,017)
—
—
—
(20,017)
Balance at December 31, 2022
1,502,235
(21,447)
6,964
—
1,487,752
Net income
—
556,446
—
—
556,446
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
(8,027)
—
(8,027)
Dividends declared
—
(308,165)
—
—
(308,165)
Forfeitures of vested restricted stock awards and exercised stock
options
(5,819)
—
—
—
(5,819)
Compensation relating to restricted stock awards
1,045
—
—
—
1,045
Compensation relating to restricted stock units awards
6,899
—
—
—
6,899
Compensation relating to stock option awards
574
—
—
—
574
Repurchase of common stock
(13,948)
—
—
—
(13,948)
Balance at December 31, 2023
1,490,986
226,834
(1,063)
—
1,716,757
Net income
—
416,724
—
—
416,724
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
(6,798)
—
(6,798)
Dividends declared
—
(284,416)
—
—
(284,416)
Forfeitures of vested restricted stock awards and exercised stock
options
(7,055)
—
—
—
(7,055)
Compensation relating to restricted stock awards
1,212
—
—
—
1,212
Compensation relating to restricted stock units awards
7,689
—
—
—
7,689
Compensation relating to stock option awards
99
—
—
—
99
Equity consideration issued for purchase of vessels
36,836
—
—
—
36,836
Repurchase of common stock
(25,000)
—
—
—
(25,000)
Balance at December 31, 2024
$ 1,504,767 $
359,142 $
(7,861)$
— $ 1,856,048
See notes to consolidated financial statements
74
International Seaways, Inc.
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
Nature of the Business
International Seaways, Inc. (“INSW”), a Marshall Islands corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company” or “INSW,”
or “we” or “us” or “our”) are engaged primarily in the ocean transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in international
markets. The Marshall Islands is the principal flag of registry of the Company’s vessels. The Company’s business is currently
organized into two reportable segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. The crude oil fleet is comprised of most major crude oil
vessel classes. The products fleet transports refined petroleum product cargoes from refineries to consuming markets characterized by
both long and short-haul routes.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company owned or operated a fleet of 78 wholly-owned or lease financed and time chartered-in
oceangoing vessels. In addition to its operating fleet, six LR1 newbuilds are scheduled for delivery to the Company between the
second half of 2025 and third quarter of 2026, bringing the total operating and newbuild fleet to 84 vessels as of December 31, 2024.
The Company’s operating fleet list excludes vessels chartered-in where the duration of the charter was one year or less at inception.
Vessels chartered-in may be bareboat charters or time charters. Under either a bareboat charter or time charter, a customer pays a daily
or monthly rate for a fixed period of time for use of the vessel. Under a bareboat charter, the customer pays all costs of operating the
vessel, including voyage expenses, such as fuel, canal tolls and port charges, and vessel expenses such as crew costs, vessel stores and
supplies, lubricating oils, maintenance and repair, insurance and communications associated with operating the vessel. Under a time
charter, the customer pays all voyage expenses and the shipowner pays all vessel expenses.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
All intercompany balances and transactions within the Company have been eliminated. Investments in 50% or less owned affiliated
companies, in which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for by the equity method.
NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
1. Cash and cash equivalents — Interest-bearing deposits that are highly liquid investments and have a maturity of three months or
less when purchased are included in cash and cash equivalents.
2. Short-term investments — Short-term investments consist of time deposits with original maturities of between 91 and 364 days.
3. Concentration of credit risk — The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk principally from cash and cash equivalents
and voyage receivables due from charterers and pools in which the Company participates. The Company manages its credit risk
exposure through assessment of the creditworthiness of its counterparties. Cash equivalents consist primarily of time deposits, and
money market funds. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents in what we believe to be credit-worthy financial
institutions. The Company’s money market funds are carried at fair market value. Voyage receivables consist of (i) operating
lease receivables associated with revenues from leases accounted for under ASC 842, Leases (ASC 842), which are primarily
accrued earnings due from pools; and (ii) billed and unbilled non-operating lease receivables associated with revenues from
services accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), which are due within one year. The
Company performs ongoing evaluations to determine customer credit and limits the amount of credit extended to customers. The
Company maintains allowances for estimated credit losses and these losses have generally been within its expectations.
With respect to non-operating lease receivables, the Company recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses in
accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit losses (ASC 326), based on troubled accounts, historical experience,
other currently available evidence, and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future. The Company makes significant
judgements and assumptions to estimate its expected losses. The Company makes judgments about the creditworthiness of
customers based on ongoing credit evaluations including analysis of the counterparty’s established credit rating or assessment of
the counterparty’s creditworthiness based on our analysis of their financial statements when a credit rating is not available,
75
International Seaways, Inc.
country and political risk of the counterparty, and their business strategy. The Company manages its non-operating lease
receivable portfolios using delinquency as a key credit quality indicator. The Company performs the following steps in estimating
expected losses: (i) gather historical losses over five years; (ii) assume outstanding billed amounts over 180 days as additional
expected losses; and (iii) make forward-looking adjustments to the expected losses to reflect future economic conditions by
comparing credit default swap rates of significant customers over time. In addition, the Company performs individual assessments
for customers that do not share risk characteristics with other customers (for example a customer under bankruptcy or a customer
with known disputes or collectability issues).
The allowance for credit losses reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the voyage receivables balance and is
recognized as an allowance or contra-asset to the voyage receivables balance. Provisions for credit losses associated with voyage
receivables are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. The movement in
the allowance for credit losses during the three years ended December 31, 2024 is summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for Credit
Losses - Voyage
Receivables
Balance at January 1, 2022
$
31
Provision for expected credit losses
230
Balance at December 31, 2022
261
Reversal of expected credit losses
(70)
Balance at December 31, 2023
191
Reversal of expected credit losses
(11)
Write-offs charged against the allowance
(94)
Balance at December 31, 2024
$
86
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company did not have any individual customers who accounted
for 10% or more of its revenues apart from the pools in which it participates. The pools in which the Company participates
accounted in aggregate for 98% and 95% of consolidated voyage receivables at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023,
respectively.
4. Inventories — Inventories, which consist principally of fuel, are stated at cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
5. Vessels, vessels construction in progress, vessel lives, deferred drydocking expenditures and other property — Vessels are
recorded at cost and are depreciated to their estimated salvage value on the straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives,
which is generally 25 years. Each vessel’s salvage value is equal to the product of its lightweight tonnage and an estimated steel
recycling price of $300 per ton. The carrying value of each of the Company’s vessels represents its original cost at the time it was
delivered or purchased less depreciation calculated using estimated useful lives from the date such vessel was originally delivered
from the shipyard. A vessel’s carrying value is reduced to its new cost basis (i.e., its current fair value) if a vessel impairment
charge is recorded.
Costs capitalized to vessels during construction include shipyard costs, direct cost of project design and engineering, project site
office administration costs, crew familiarization training costs and interest costs. Interest costs capitalized during the construction
period of a vessel represent the amount which theoretically could have been avoided had the Company not made installment
payments on the vessel under construction. Interest capitalized aggregated $1.3 million, $2.4 million, and $4.3 million in 2024,
2023, and 2022, respectively (See Note 5, “Vessels, Deferred Drydock and Other Property”).
Other property, including leasehold improvements, are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of
the terms of the leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years.
Expenditures incurred during a drydocking are deferred and amortized on the straight-line basis over the period until the next
scheduled drydocking, which is generally two and a half to five years. The Company only includes in deferred drydocking costs
those direct costs that are incurred as part of the drydocking to meet regulatory requirements or are expenditures that add
economic life to the vessel, increase the vessel’s earnings capacity or improve the vessel’s efficiency. Direct costs include
shipyard costs as well as the costs of placing the vessel in the shipyard. Expenditures for normal maintenance and repairs, whether
incurred as part of the drydocking or not, are expensed as incurred.
76
International Seaways, Inc.
6. Impairment of long-lived assets — The carrying amounts of long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for
potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not
be fully recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than the asset’s carrying amount. This
assessment is made at the individual vessel level since separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available.
The impairment charge, if any, would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a vessel exceeded its fair
value. If using an income approach in determining the fair value of a vessel, the Company will consider the discounted cash flows
resulting from the highest and best use of the vessel asset from a market-participant’s perspective. Alternatively, if using a market
approach, the Company will obtain third-party appraisals of the estimated fair value of the vessel. A long-lived asset impairment
charge results in a new cost basis being established for the relevant long-lived asset. See Note 5, “Vessels, Deferred Drydock and
Other Property,” for further discussion on the impairment tests performed on certain of our vessels during the three years ended
December 31, 2024.
7. Deferred finance charges — Finance charges, excluding original issue discount, incurred in the arrangement and/or amendments
resulting in the modification of debt are deferred and amortized to interest expense on either an effective interest method or
straight-line basis over the life of the related debt. Unamortized deferred finance charges of $11.2 million and $4.5 million
relating to the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility and the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2024
and 2023, respectively, are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Unamortized deferred financing charges of
$6.4 million and $11.3 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, relating to the Company’s outstanding debt
facilities, are included in long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets.
Interest expense relating to the amortization of deferred financing costs amounted to $3.3 million in 2024, $4.7 million in 2023
and $4.9 million in 2022.
8. Revenue and expense recognition — The Company’s contract revenues consist of revenues from time charters, bareboat charters,
voyage charters and pool revenues. The majority of the Company's contracts for pool revenues, time and bareboat charter
revenues, and voyage charter revenues are accounted for as lease revenue under ASC 842. Lightering services provided by the
Company's Crude Tanker Lightering Business and voyage charter contracts that do not meet the definition of a lease are
accounted for as service revenues under ASC 606.
Under ASC 842, lease revenue for fixed lease payments is recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis and lease
revenue for variable lease payments (e.g., demurrage, pool earnings) are recognized in the period in which the changes in facts
and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. Initial direct costs are expensed over the lease term on
the same basis as lease revenue. The Company has elected the lessor practical expedient to aggregate non-lease components with
the associated lease components and to account for the combined components as required by the practical expedient since its
primary revenue streams described above meet the conditions required to adopt the practical expedient. Furthermore, the
Company has performed a qualitative analysis of each of its primary revenue contract types to determine whether the lease
component or the non-lease component is the predominant component of the contract. The Company concluded that the lease
component is the predominant component for all of its primary revenue contract types, as the lessee would ascribe more value to
the control and use of the underlying vessel rather than to the technical services to operate the vessel which is an add-on service to
the lessee.
Revenues from time charters are accounted for as fixed rate operating leases with an embedded technical management service
component and are recognized ratably over the rental periods of such charters. Bareboat charters are also accounted for as fixed
rate operating leases and the associated revenue is recognized ratably over the rental periods of such charters.
Voyage charters contain a lease component if the contract (i) specifies a specific vessel asset; and (ii) has terms that allow the
charterer to exercise substantive decision-making rights, which have an economic value to the charterer and therefore allow the
charterer to direct how and for what purpose the vessel is used. Voyage charter revenues and expenses are recognized ratably over
the estimated length of each voyage. For a voyage charter which contains a lease component, revenue and expenses are
recognized based on a lease commencement-to-discharge basis and the lease commencement date is the latter of discharge of the
previous cargo or voyage charter contract signing. For voyage charters that do not have a lease component, revenue and expenses
are recognized based on a load-to-discharge basis. Accordingly, voyage expenses incurred during a vessel’s positioning voyage to
77
International Seaways, Inc.
a load port in order to serve a customer under a voyage charter not containing a lease are considered costs to fulfill a contract and
are deferred and recognized ratably over the load-to-discharge portion of the contract.
Under voyage charters, expenses such as fuel, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling operations and brokerage commissions are
paid by the Company whereas, under time and bareboat charters, such voyage costs are paid by the Company’s customers.
For the Company’s vessels operating in pools, revenues and voyage expenses are pooled and allocated to each pool’s participants
on a time charter equivalent (“TCE”) basis in accordance with an agreed-upon formula. Accordingly, the Company accounts for
its agreements with commercial pools as variable rate operating leases. For the pools in which the Company participates,
management monitors, among other things, the relative proportion of the Company’s vessels operating in each of the pools to the
total number of vessels in each of the respective pools and assesses whether or not the Company’s participation interest in each of
the pools is sufficiently significant so as to determine that the Company has effective control of the pool.
Demurrage earned during a voyage charter represents variable consideration. The Company estimates demurrage at contract
inception using either the expected value or most likely amount approaches. Such estimate is reviewed and updated over the term
of the voyage charter contract.
The Company recognizes revenues from services in accordance with the provisions of ASC 606. The standard provides a unified
model to determine how revenue is recognized. In doing so, the Company makes judgments including identifying performance
obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the
transaction price to each performance obligation. Revenues are recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under its agreements, the
Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of
whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the
contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the
transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the
Company satisfies each performance obligation.
As the Company’s performance obligations are services which are received and consumed by its customers as it performs such
services, revenues are recognized over time proportionate to the days elapsed since the service commencement compared to the
total days anticipated to complete the service. The minimum duration of services is less than one year for each of the Company’s
current contracts.
9. Leases — The Company currently has two major categories of lease contracts under which the Company is a lessee – chartered-in
vessels and leased office and other space. Chartered-in vessels include bareboat charters which have a lease component only and
time charters which have both lease and non-lease components. The lease component relates to the cost to a lessee to control the
use of the vessel and the non-lease components relate to the cost to the lessee for the lessor to operate the vessel (technical
management service components). For time charters-in, the Company has separated non-lease components from lease component
and scoped out non-lease components from the application of ASC 842. For leased office and other space, the Company has
elected the ASC 842 practical expedient to account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component as it is not
practical to separate the insignificant non-lease components from the associated lease components for these types of leases.
Further, the Company has elected as an accounting policy not to apply ASC 842 to its portfolio of short-term leases (i.e., leases
with an original term of 12-months or less). Instead, the lease payments are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis
over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. (see Note 15,
“Leases,” for additional information with respect to the Company’s short-term leases).
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use
(“ROU”) assets, current portion of operating lease liabilities, and long-term operating lease liabilities in the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets.
ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make
lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on
the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any prepaid lease payments
made and excludes accrued lease payments and lease incentives. Our lease terms take into consideration options to extend or
78
International Seaways, Inc.
terminate the lease or purchase the underlying asset when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options. Lease
expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at
commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company makes significant judgements and
assumptions to estimate the incremental borrowing rate that it would have to pay to borrow on a 100% collateralized basis over a
term similar to the lease term and in an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. The Company
performs the following steps in estimating its incremental borrowing rate: (i) gather observable debt yields of the Company’s
recently issued debt facilities; and (ii) make adjustments to the yields of the actual debt facilities to reflect changes in collateral
level, terms, the risk-free interest rate, and credit ratings. In addition, the Company performs sensitivity analyses to evaluate the
impact of changes in the selected discount rates on the estimated lease liability.
The Company makes significant judgements and assumptions to separate the lease component from the non-lease component of
its time chartered-in vessels. For purposes of determining the standalone selling price of the vessel lease and technical
management service components of the Company’s time charters, the Company concluded that the residual approach would be
the most appropriate method to use given that vessel lease rates are highly variable depending on shipping market conditions, the
duration of such charters, and the age of the vessel. The Company believes that the standalone transaction price attributable to the
technical management service component is more readily determinable than the price of the lease component and, accordingly,
the price of the service component is estimated using observable data (such as fees charged by third-party technical managers)
and the residual transaction price is attributed to the vessel lease component.
The Company is party to a number of sale and leaseback transactions in which certain of our vessels were sold to third parties and
then leased back under bareboat charter-in arrangements. For each arrangement, we evaluated whether, in substance, these
transactions were leases or a form of financing. We have concluded that each arrangement was a form of financing on the basis
that each transaction was a sale and leaseback transaction that did not meet the criteria for a sale under ASC 842. Accordingly,
such arrangement was recorded at amortized costs using the effective interest method, with the corresponding vessels remaining
on the balance sheet at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
10. Derivatives — ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the consolidated balance
sheets at fair value. Derivatives that are not effective hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is an
effective hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, a change in the fair value of the derivative is either recorded to current
earnings (fair value hedge), or recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period
or periods during which the hedge transaction affects earnings (cash flow hedge).
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-
management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that
are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception
and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting
changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future
periods. When it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues
hedge accounting prospectively, as discussed below.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in
offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item such as forecasted transactions; (2) the derivative expires or is sold,
terminated, or exercised; (3) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; or (4) management determines that
designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate or desired.
When the Company discontinues hedge accounting because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in
the originally expected period, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is
reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction
will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the
gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive loss will be recognized immediately in earnings. In all situations
in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, the Company will carry the derivative at its
fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, recognizing changes in the fair value in current-period earnings, unless it is
designated in a new hedging relationship.
79
International Seaways, Inc.
Any gain or loss realized upon the early termination of an interest rate cap, collar or swaps is recognized as an adjustment of
interest expense over the shorter of the remaining term of the derivative instruments or the hedged debt. See Note 8, “Fair Value
of Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Fair Value Disclosures,” for additional disclosures on the Company’s interest rate cap,
collar and swaps and other financial instruments.
11. Fair value measurements — The Company accounts for certain assets and liabilities at fair value under ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurement (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, essentially an exit price. In addition, the
fair value of assets and liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, which for the liabilities described below
includes the Company's own credit risk. The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs
used in measuring fair value are observable in the market:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 non-derivative assets and liabilities
primarily include cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or model-based valuation techniques for which all
significant inputs are observable in the market (where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the
future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves, credit spreads, etc.).
Our Level 2 non-derivative liabilities primarily include the Company’s other outstanding debt facilities. Our Level 2
derivative assets and liabilities primarily include our interest rate swaps.
Level 3 - Inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions).
12. Income taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial
statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial
statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected
to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date.
Net deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In
making such a determination, all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including future reversals of existing
taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. In the
event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their
net recorded amount, an adjustment would be made to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the
provision for income taxes in the period such determination is made.
Uncertain tax positions are recorded in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, on the basis of a two-step process whereby
(1) the Company first determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical
merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company
recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related
tax authority.
13. Variable Interest Entities — The Company determines at the inception of each arrangement whether an entity in which we have
made an investment or in which we have other variable interests is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”). We consolidate a
VIE when we are the primary beneficiary, i.e., when we have the power to direct activities that most significantly affect the
economic performance of the VIE and have the obligation to absorb losses or benefits that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. If we are not the primary beneficiary, we account for the investment or other variable interests in a VIE in accordance with
applicable generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
We assess whether any changes in our interest or relationship with the entity have occurred that may affect our determination of
whether the entity is a VIE and, if so, whether we are or remain the primary beneficiary. See Note 7, “Variable Interest Entities,”
for additional information.
14. Use of estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses reported in the financial
80
International Seaways, Inc.
statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates relate to the depreciation of vessels and other property,
amortization of drydocking costs, judgments involved in identifying performance obligations in revenue contracts, estimating the
amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to each performance
obligation, estimates used in assessing the recoverability of equity method investments and other long-lived assets, liabilities
incurred relating to pension benefits, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
15. Recently adopted accounting standards - In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Improvements to Reportable
Segment Disclosures. This guidance is expected to improve financial reporting by providing additional information about a public
company’s significant segment expenses and more timely and detailed segment information reporting throughout the fiscal year.
This guidance requires annual and interim period disclosure of significant segment expenses that are provided to the chief
operating decision maker (“CODM”) as well as interim disclosures for all reportable segments’ profit or loss. It also requires
disclosure of the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measures of segment
profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. The amendments in ASU 2023-07 are
effective for us for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2024. We adopted the standard in this annual report for the year ended December 31, 2024 and applied
retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 4, “Business and Segment
Reporting.”
16. Recently issued accounting standards — The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards
Codification is the sole source of authoritative GAAP other than United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
issued rules and regulations that apply only to SEC registrants. The FASB issues Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) to
communicate changes to the codification. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not referenced
below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. This guidance will
require additional disclosures and disaggregation of certain costs and expenses presented on the face of the income statement. The
amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2026 and interim reporting periods within
fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2027 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this new
guidance on the disclosures to our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings, after the deduction of dividends and undistributed earnings
allocated to participating securities, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
The computation of diluted earnings per share assumes the issuance of common stock for all potentially dilutive stock options and
restricted stock units not classified as participating securities. Participating securities are defined by ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, as
unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents and are included in the
computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
There were 22,134, 36,078 and 64,882 weighted average shares of unvested restricted common stock shares considered to be
participating securities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Such participating securities are
allocated a portion of income, but not losses under the two-class method. As of December 31, 2024, there were 311,153 shares of
restricted stock units and 174,417 stock options outstanding considered to be potentially dilutive securities.
Reconciliations of the numerator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Net income allocated to:
Common Stockholders
$
416,546
$
556,043
$
387,401
Participating securities
178
403
490
$
416,724
$
556,446
$
387,891
81
International Seaways, Inc.
There were 409,631, 450,515 and 463,445 dilutive equity awards outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and
2022, respectively. Awards of 33,245, 40,504 and 86,524 for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because inclusion of these awards would be anti-dilutive.
NOTE 4 — BUSINESS AND SEGMENT REPORTING:
The Company is engaged primarily in the ocean transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international market through
the ownership and operation of a diversified fleet of vessels. The shipping industry has many distinct market segments based, in large
part, on the size and design configuration of vessels required and, in some cases, on the flag of registry. Rates in each market segment
are determined by a variety of factors affecting the supply and demand for vessels to move cargoes in the trades for which they are
suited. Tankers are not bound to specific ports or schedules and therefore can respond to market opportunities by moving between
trades and geographical areas. The Company charters its vessels to commercial shippers and foreign governments and governmental
agencies primarily on voyage charters and on time charters.
The Company has two reportable segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. The Crude Tankers segment aggregates the
Company’s VLCC, Suezmax, Aframax, and Lightering operating segments. The Product Carriers segment aggregates LR2, LR1, and
MR operating segments. The joint ventures with two floating storage and offloading service vessels, which were sold in June 2022,
were included in the Crude Tankers Segment. The accounting policies followed by the reportable segments are the same as those
followed in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies.”
The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, who is the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), evaluates segment
performance based on adjusted income from vessel operations, which for segment reporting is defined as income from vessel
operations before general and administrative expenses, other operating expenses, third-party debt modification fees, and gain on
disposal of vessels and other property, net of impairments. These and other centrally managed items such as interest expense, net and
taxes, are excluded from the measure of segment profitability reviewed by management. In making resource allocation decisions, the
CODM reviews budget-to-actual variances of TCE revenues and vessel expenses (as these are quantitatively the primary drivers of
each segment’s adjusted income from vessel operations), short-term and long-term market trends, current and projected vessel values
and forecasts.
82
International Seaways, Inc.
Information about the Company’s reportable segments as of and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2024 follows:
Crude
Product
(Dollars in thousands)
Tankers
Carriers
Other
Totals
2024
Shipping revenues
$
451,351 $
500,262
$
—
$
951,613
Time charter equivalent revenues
437,095
496,008
—
933,103
Vessel expenses
130,107
145,554
—
275,661
Charter hire expenses
14,322
15,517
—
29,839
Depreciation and amortization
80,988
68,452
—
149,440
Loss/(gain) on disposal of vessels and other assets, net of impairments
8,704
(41,361)
—
(32,657)
Adjusted income from vessel operations
211,678
266,485
—
478,163
Adjusted total assets at December 31, 2024
1,437,883
1,005,559
—
2,443,442
Expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements
1,135
277,659
—
278,794
Payments for drydocking
9,893
48,749
—
58,642
2023
Shipping revenues
$
524,006 $
547,769
$
—
$
1,071,775
Time charter equivalent revenues
512,220
543,299
—
1,055,519
Vessel expenses
115,708
143,831
—
259,539
Charter hire expenses
11,870
27,534
—
39,404
Depreciation and amortization
76,877
52,160
1
129,038
Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets
(12)
(35,922)
—
(35,934)
Adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations
307,764
319,775
(1)
627,538
Adjusted total assets at December 31, 2023
1,523,713
785,778
—
2,309,491
Expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements
184,467
20,692
—
205,159
Payments for drydocking
5,659
28,880
—
34,539
2022
Shipping revenues
$
331,699 $
532,966
$
—
$
864,665
Time charter equivalent revenues
321,857
531,853
—
853,710
Vessel expenses
98,844
141,830
—
240,674
Charter hire expenses
15,380
16,752
—
32,132
Depreciation and amortization
62,596
47,706
86
110,388
Loss/(gain) on disposal of vessels and other property, net of impairments
1,091
(20,738)
—
(19,647)
Adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations
145,037
325,565
(86)
470,516
Equity in income of affiliated companies
714
—
—
714
Adjusted total assets at December 31, 2022
1,428,846
833,798
—
2,262,644
Expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements
85,567
30,409
—
115,976
Payments for drydocking
25,963
17,364
—
43,327
Reconciliations of time charter equivalent revenues of the segments to shipping revenues as reported in the consolidated statements of
operations follow:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Time charter equivalent revenues
$
933,103
$
1,055,519
$
853,710
Add: Voyage expenses
18,510
16,256
10,955
Shipping revenues
$
951,613
$
1,071,775
$
864,665
Consistent with general practice in the shipping industry, the Company uses time charter equivalent revenues, which represents
shipping revenues less voyage expenses, as a measure to compare revenue generated from a voyage charter to revenue generated from
a time charter. Time charter equivalent revenues, a non-GAAP measure, provides additional meaningful information in conjunction
with shipping revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, because it assists Company management in making decisions
regarding the deployment and use of its vessels and in evaluating their financial performance.
83
International Seaways, Inc.
Reconciliations of adjusted income from vessel operations of the segments to income before income taxes, as reported in the
consolidated statements of operations follow:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Total adjusted income from vessel operations of all segments
$
478,163
$
627,538
$
470,516
General and administrative expenses
(52,607)
(47,473)
(46,351)
Other operating expenses
(2,820)
—
—
Third-party debt modification fees
(168)
(568)
(1,158)
Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets, net of impairments
32,657
35,934
19,647
Consolidated income from vessel operations
455,225
615,431
442,654
Equity in results of affiliated companies
—
—
714
Other income
10,118
10,652
2,332
Interest expense
(49,703)
(65,759)
(57,721)
Income before income taxes
$
415,640
$
560,324
$
387,979
Reconciliations of adjusted total assets of the segments to amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets follow:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Adjusted total assets of all segments
$
2,443,442
$
2,309,491
Corporate unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
157,506
126,760
Short-term investments
—
60,000
Other unallocated amounts
35,449
25,568
Consolidated total assets
$
2,636,397
$
2,521,819
Certain additional information about the Company’s operations for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2024 follows:
Crude
Product
(Dollars in thousands)
Tankers
Carriers
Other
Consolidated
Total vessels, deferred drydock and other property at December 31, 2024 $
1,345,241 $
831,493 $
706 $
2,177,440
Total vessels, deferred drydock and other property at December 31, 2023
1,420,750
575,642
584
1,996,976
Total vessels, deferred drydock and other property at December 31, 2022
1,265,019
604,114
428
1,869,561
NOTE 5 — VESSELS, DEFERRED DRYDOCK AND OTHER PROPERTY:
Vessels and other property consist of the following:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Vessels, at cost
$
2,506,606
$
2,333,066
Accumulated depreciation
(460,623)
(422,276)
Vessels, net
2,045,983
1,910,790
Other property, at cost
9,961
8,634
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(5,733)
(4,998)
Other property, net
4,228
3,636
Total vessels and other property, net
2,050,211
1,914,426
Construction in Progress
37,020
11,670
84
International Seaways, Inc.
The aggregate carrying value of the 41 owned and chartered-in vessels pledged as collateral under the Company’s debt and lease
financing facilities (see Note 9, “Debt”) was $1,569.0 million as of December 31, 2024.
A breakdown of the carrying value of the Company’s owned and chartered-in vessels by reportable segment and fleet as of December
31, 2024 and 2023 follows:
Net
Average
Number of
Accumulated
Carrying
Vessel Age
Owned
As of December 31, 2024 (Dollars in thousands)
Cost
Depreciation
Value
(by dwt)
Vessels
Crude Tankers
VLCC
$
1,055,765
$
(209,650) $
846,115
8.8
13
Suezmax
451,416
(79,900)
371,516
10.8
13
Aframax
109,306
(18,529)
90,777
12.8
4
Total Crude Tankers
1,616,487
(308,079)
1,308,408
9.7
30
Product Carriers
LR2
75,128
(28,280)
46,848
10.4
1
LR1
118,265
(33,198)
85,067
15.6
6
MR
696,726
(91,066)
605,660
14.2
39
Total Product Carriers(1)
890,119
(152,544)
737,575
14.3
46
Fleet Total
$
2,506,606
$
(460,623) $
2,045,983
11.0
76
(1) Includes seven MRs with a carrying value of $266.5 million, which the Company believes exceeds its market value of
approximately $259.7 million by $6.8 million.
Net
Average
Number of
Accumulated
Carrying
Vessel Age
Owned
As of December 31, 2023 (Dollars in thousands)
Cost
Depreciation
Value
(by dwt)
Vessels
Crude Tankers
VLCC
$
1,128,971
$
(232,992) $
895,979
7.8
13
Suezmax
451,248
(61,173)
390,075
9.8
13
Aframax
108,910
(12,811)
96,099
11.8
4
Total Crude Tankers
1,689,129
(306,976)
1,382,153
8.7
30
Product Carriers
LR2
74,964
(25,533)
49,431
9.4
1
LR1
116,784
(26,840)
89,944
14.6
6
MR
452,189
(62,927)
389,262
14.3
35
Total Product Carriers
643,937
(115,300)
528,637
14.1
42
Fleet Total
$
2,333,066
$
(422,276) $
1,910,790
10.1
72
85
International Seaways, Inc.
Vessel activity for the three years ended December 31, 2024 is summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Vessel Cost
Accumulated Depreciation
Net Book Value
Balance at January 1, 2022
$
2,044,514
(244,622) $
1,799,892
Purchases and vessel additions
41,499
—
Disposals
(76,881)
4,033
Depreciation
—
(89,747)
Impairment
(4,712)
3,015
Balance at December 31, 2022
2,004,420
(327,321)
1,677,099
Purchases and vessel additions
360,822
—
Disposals
(32,176)
3,904
Depreciation
—
(98,859)
Balance at December 31, 2023
2,333,066
(422,276)
1,910,790
Purchases and vessel additions
280,786
—
Disposals
(33,281)
5,681
Depreciation
—
(109,293)
Impairment
(73,965)
65,265
Balance at December 31, 2024
$
2,506,606
$
(460,623) $
2,045,983
The total of purchases and vessel additions will differ from expenditures for vessels as shown in the consolidated statements of cash
flows because of the timing of when payments were made.
Vessel Impairments
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company gave consideration on a quarterly basis as to whether events or changes in
circumstances had occurred since December 31, 2023, that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessels in the Company’s
fleet may not be recoverable. During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, the Company determined that the contracted sale of one of
its 2010-built VLCCs resulted in the recognition of a held-for-use impairment charge of $8.7 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company gave consideration on a quarterly basis as to whether events or changes in
circumstances had occurred since December 31, 2022, that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessels in the Company’s
fleet may not be recoverable. The Company determined that no held-for-use or held-for-sale impairment indicators existed for the
Company’s vessels during the year ended December 31, 2023.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company gave consideration on a quarterly basis as to whether events or changes in
circumstances had occurred since December 31, 2021, that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessels in the Company’s
fleet may not be recoverable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2022, the Company concluded that the contracted sales of one 2004-
built Panamax and two 2006-built Handysize product carriers resulted in the recognition of held-for-sale impairment charges
aggregating $1.7 million.
Vessel Acquisitions and Construction Commitments
In January 2022, the Company entered into memoranda of agreements for the sale of a 2010-built MR for a sale price of $16.5 million
and the purchase of a 2011-built LR1 for a purchase price of $19.5 million with the same counterparty. The LR1 was delivered into
our niche commercial pool, Panamax International. The Company closed both transactions during the first quarter of 2022,
recognizing a gain of $4.5 million on the sale of the 2010-built MR and a net cash outflow of $3.0 million representing the difference
in value between the two vessels.
On December 6, 2022, the Company gave notice of its intent to exercise its options to purchase two 2009-built Aframaxes that it had
been bareboat chartering-in. The aggregate purchase price for the two vessels was $43.0 million. On March 30, 2023 and April 4,
2023, the Company completed the purchase of the two Aframaxes.
86
International Seaways, Inc.
The Company’s three newbuild dual-fuel LNG VLCCs were delivered to the Company on March 7, 2023, April 11, 2023, and May
24, 2023, respectively. All three vessels commenced employment under seven-year time charter contracts with an oil major shortly
after delivery.
Between August 2023 and March 2024, the Company entered into agreements to construct six dual-fuel ready LNG 73,600 dwt LR1
Product Carriers at K Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.’s shipyard. The six LR1s are contracted to be delivered beginning in the second half of
2025 through the third quarter of 2026 for an aggregate cost of approximately $359 million. The remaining commitments on the
contracts for the construction of the LR1 newbuilds as of December 31, 2024 was $323.4 million, which will be paid for through a
combination of long-term financing and available liquidity.
On February 23, 2024, the Company entered into agreements to acquire two 2014-built and four 2015-built MR Product Carriers for
an aggregate consideration of approximately $232 million, payable 85% in cash and 15% in shares of common stock of the Company.
All six vessels were delivered during the second quarter of 2024 and are Collateral Vessels under the $500 Million Revolving Credit
Facility (see Note 9, “Debt”). In total, for the acquisition of the vessels, the Company paid $198.3 million in cash, including $1.1
million for initial stores on board and directly related third-party professional fees, and also issued 623,778 shares of its common stock
to the sellers. Such shares had an aggregate value of $36.8 million based upon the closing market price of the Company’s stock on
each of the vessel delivery dates.
An automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 was filed with the SEC on April 29, 2024 that, in connection with prospectus
supplements filed during the second quarter of 2024, registered the aggregate 623,778 shares that were issued in conjunction with
these vessel acquisitions and facilitated the seller’s ability to offer and sell or otherwise dispose of the shares of common stock issued
to them under this transaction.
On November 28, 2024, the Company entered into memoranda of agreements for the sale of one 2010-built VLCC and one 2011-built
VLCC for an aggregate sales price of $116.6 million and the purchase of three 2015-built MRs, one of which was delivered to the
Company on December 30, 2024, for an aggregate purchase price of $119.5 million with the same counterparty. The Company closed
on all five transactions between December 2024 and February 2025, with a net cash outflow of $2.9 million, representing the
difference in transaction prices among the five vessels. The Company recognized a net gain on disposal of the two VLCCs in the first
quarter of 2025. In conjunction with the agreements, the buyer of each vessel was required to lodge a deposit equal to 10% of the
vessel’s purchase price into an escrow account, and to ensure that all five vessel transactions were executed, the seller of each vessel
was also required to make an additional security deposit of $2.5 million into an escrow account. These security deposits were refunded
to each respective seller after all five vessel transactions were completed in February 2025. Deposits of $8.0 million relating to the
purchases of the two 2015-built MRs that delivered to the Company in January 2025 are included in other assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. Additionally, security deposits totaling $5.0 million made by the Company in
relation to the two VLCCs delivered to the counterparty in 2025 are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024.
Disposal/Sales of Vessel and Other Property
During 2022, the Company recognized a net aggregate gain of $18.0 million on disposal of two 2008-built MRs, one 2002-built
Panamax, one 2004-built Panamax and four 2006-built Handysize product carriers.
During 2023, the Company recognized a net aggregate gain of $36.1 million on disposal of three 2008-built MRs.
During 2024, the Company recognized a net aggregate gain of $41.3 million on disposal of one 2009-built and two 2008-built MRs.
87
International Seaways, Inc.
Drydocking activity for the three years ended December 31, 2024 is summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Balance at January 1
$
70,880
$
65,611
$
55,753
Additions
61,696
35,117
35,988
Sub-total
132,576
100,728
91,741
Drydock amortization
(39,391)
(28,787)
(19,809)
Amount charged to gain or loss on disposal of
vessels
(2,976)
(1,061)
(6,321)
Balance at December 31
$
90,209
$
70,880
$
65,611
The total additions above will differ from payments for drydocking as shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows because of
the timing of when payments were made.
NOTE 6 — EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS:
Pursuant to a share purchase agreement, on June 7, 2022, the Company sold its 50% ownership interest in two joint ventures - TI
Africa Limited (“TI Africa”) and TI Asia Limited (“TI Asia”), which operated two Floating Storage and Offloading Service vessels
that were converted from two ULCCs (collectively the “FSO Joint Venture”), to its joint venture partner Euronav NV. The Company
received, net of adjustments for working capital and expenses, approximately $140 million in cash from the sale. The Company
recorded a loss on the sale of $9.5 million and reclassified the Company’s share of the unrealized losses associated with the interest
rate swaps held by the FSO Joint Venture at the time of the sale of $0.1 million into earnings from accumulated other comprehensive
income/(loss).
The share purchase agreement contains specified representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions of the parties
customary for transactions of this type.
NOTE 7 —VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (“VIEs”):
Commercial pools in which the Company participates operate a large number of vessels as an integrated transportation system, which
offer customers greater flexibility and a higher level of service while achieving scheduling efficiencies. Participants in the commercial
pools contribute one or more vessels and generally provide an initial contribution towards the working capital of the pools at the time
they enter their vessels. The pools finance their operations primarily through the earnings that they generate.
From time to time, INSW enters into joint ventures to take advantage of commercial opportunities. In each joint venture, INSW has
the same relative rights and obligations and financial risks and rewards as its partners. INSW evaluated all of its pooling and joint
venture arrangements to determine if they were variable interest entities (“VIEs”). INSW determined that each pool and each joint
venture met the criteria of a VIE and, therefore, INSW reviewed its participation in these VIEs to determine if it was the primary
beneficiary of any of them.
INSW reviewed the legal documents that govern the creation and management of the VIEs and also analyzed its involvement to
determine if INSW was a primary beneficiary in any of these VIEs. A VIE for which INSW is determined to be the primary
beneficiary is required to be consolidated in its financial statements.
Unconsolidated VIEs
The formation agreements for the commercial pools state that the board of the pool has decision making power over their significant
decisions. In addition, all such decisions must be approved unanimously by the board. Since INSW shares power to make all
significant economic decisions that affect the pools and does not control a majority of the board, INSW is not considered a primary
beneficiary of the pools.
88
International Seaways, Inc.
The following table presents the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets related to the
unconsolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Pool working capital deposits
$
35,372
$
31,748
In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company evaluated its maximum exposure to loss related to these VIEs by assuming a
complete loss of the Company’s investment in these VIEs. The table below compares the Company’s liability in the consolidated
balance sheet to the maximum exposure to loss at December 31, 2024:
(Dollars in thousands)
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Maximum
Exposure to Loss
Other Liabilities
$
—
$
35,372
In addition, as of December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $178.6 million of trade receivables due from the pools that
were determined to be a VIE. These trade receivables, which are included in voyage receivables in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet, have been excluded from the above tables and the calculation of INSW’s maximum exposure to loss. The Company
does not record the maximum exposure to loss as a liability because it does not believe that such a loss is probable of occurring as of
December 31, 2024.
NOTE 8 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES:
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, other than derivatives that are not measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2024 and 2023 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2024
December 31, 2023
Fair Value Level
Cash and cash equivalents
$
157,506
$
126,760
Level 1
Short-term investments(1)
—
60,000
Level 1
$500 Million Revolving Credit Facility(2)
(144,581)
(113,598)
Level 2
ING Credit Facility(2)
—
(20,833)
Level 2
Ocean Yield Lease Financing(2)
(282,627)
(311,907)
Level 2
BoComm Lease Financing(3)
(188,370)
(210,186)
Level 2
Toshin Lease Financing(3)
(11,662)
(13,566)
Level 2
Hyuga Lease Financing(3)
(11,776)
(13,643)
Level 2
Kaiyo Lease Financing(3)
(10,554)
(12,419)
Level 2
Kaisha Lease Financing(3)
(10,656)
(12,519)
Level 2
(1) Short-term investments consist of time deposits with original maturities of between 91 and 180 days.
(2) Floating rate debt – the fair value of floating rate debt has been determined using level 2 inputs and is considered to be equal to
the carrying value since it bears a variable interest rate, which is reset every three months.
(3) Fixed rate debt – the fair value of fixed rate debt has been determined using level 2 inputs by discounting the expected cash flows
of the outstanding debt.
Derivatives
The Company uses interest rate caps, collars and swaps for the management of interest rate risk exposure associated with changes in
LIBOR or SOFR interest rate payments due on its credit facilities.
On June 2, 2022, the Company entered into amortizing interest rate swap agreements covering a notional amount of $475 million of
the then $750 Million Facility Term Loan (now $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility) with major financial institutions participating
in such facility that effectively converts the Company’s interest rate exposure from a three-month SOFR floating rate to a fixed rate of
2.84% through the maturity date of February 22, 2027, effective August 22, 2022. The interest rate swap agreements, which contain
no leverage features, are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The outstanding unamortized notional amount of these interest
89
International Seaways, Inc.
rates swaps was $228.2 million as of December 31, 2024 covering for accounting purposes the $144.6 million principal balance
outstanding under the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility and $83.6 million of the principal balance outstanding under the Ocean
Yield Lease Financing.
Terminated Derivatives
In November 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the Sinosure Credit Facility (see Note 9, “Debt”), the Company terminated
its amended interest rate swap agreement providing for a fixed-three month LIBOR rate of 2.5%, originally scheduled to expire on
December 21, 2027, with a cash payment of $11.7 million. The amended interest rate swap agreement did not in its entirety meet the
definition of a derivative instrument because of its off market fixed rate at inception and was deemed to be a hybrid instrument with a
financing component and an embedded at-the-market derivative. Such embedded derivative was bifurcated and accounted for
separately in the same manner as the Company’s other derivatives. The financing component was recorded in current and noncurrent
other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at amortized cost. Due to an other-than-insignificant financing element on a portion
of such hybrid instrument, the cash flows associated with this hybrid instrument were classified as financing activities in the
consolidated statement of cash flows. Upon termination, a $4.2 million loss related to the extinguishment of the financing component
of the hybrid instrument was recognized in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2021 and a $4.1 million loss associated with the embedded derivative component of the hybrid instrument remained in
accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) to be released into earnings as the forecasted interest accrual transactions either affect
earnings or become not probable of occurring. Approximately $1.7 million, $2.0 million and $2.2 million of such losses were released
to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022,
respectively, and an additional $0.5 million is expected to amortize out of accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings within
the next 12 months.
In May 2022, in connection with the refinancing of its $390 Million Facility Term Loan and $525 Million Facility Term Loan (see
Note 9, “Debt”), the Company terminated all of its existing in-the-money LIBOR based interest swaps with an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $358.6 million and received net cash proceeds of approximately $9.6 million. Upon termination, a $9.7
million gain associated with the swaps remained in accumulated other comprehensive income to be released into earnings as the
forecasted interest accrual transactions either affect earnings or become not probable of occurring. Approximately $2.5 million, $4.1
million and $3.0 million of this gain was released to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and an additional $0.1 million of the gain is expected to amortize out of
accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings within the next 12 months.
Tabular disclosure of derivatives location
Derivatives are recorded on a net basis by counterparty when a legal right of offset exists. The Company had the following amounts
recorded on a net basis by transaction in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets related to the Company’s use of derivatives as
of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments:
(Dollars in thousands)
Current portion of
derivative asset
Long-term
derivative
assets
Other
receivables
December 31, 2024:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps
$
2,080
$
801
$
453
Total
$
2,080
$
801
$
453
December 31, 2023:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps
$
5,081
$
1,153
$
961
Total
$
5,081
$
1,153
$
961
90
International Seaways, Inc.
The following tables present information with respect to gains and losses on derivative positions reflected in the consolidated
statements of operations or in the consolidated statements of other comprehensive income.
The effect of cash flow hedging relationships recognized in other comprehensive income excluding amounts reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), including hedges of equity method investees, for the three years ended December 31,
2024 follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps
$
3,532
$
3,187
$
22,905
Total other comprehensive income
$
3,532
$
3,187
$
22,905
The effect of cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations is presented excluding hedges of equity
method investees. The effect of the Company’s cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statement of operations for
the three years ended December 31, 2024 is shown below:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps
$
(6,885) $
(8,601) $
(1,044)
Discontinued hedging instruments:
Interest rate swap
(820)
(2,149)
(216)
Total interest income
$
(7,705) $
(10,750) $
(1,260)
See Note 13, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(loss),” for disclosures relating to the impact of derivative instruments on
accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The following table presents the fair values, which are pre-tax, for assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (excluding
investments in affiliated companies):
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2024
December 31, 2023
Fair Value Level
Derivative Assets (interest rate swaps)
$
3,334
$
7,195
Level 2(1)
(1) Fair values are derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into
account contract terms such as maturity, as well as other inputs such as interest rate yield curves and creditworthiness of the
counterparty and the Company.
The following table summarizes the fair values of assets for which impairment charges were recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2024:
Impairment
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Level 2
Charges
Crude Tankers - Vessels held for use (1)(2)
$
56,250
$
56,250
$
(8,700)
____________________________
(1) A pre-tax held-for-use impairment charge of $8.7 million was recorded during the three-months ended December 31, 2024 to
write the value of a 2010-built VLCC down to its estimated fair value.
(2) The fair value measurement of $56.3 million at December 31, 2024 used to determine the impairment of the vessel was based
upon a market approach, which considered the expected sale price of the vessel based on an executed memorandum of agreement
91
International Seaways, Inc.
as discussed in Note 5, “Vessels.” Because sales of vessels occur somewhat infrequently the expected sales price is considered to
be Level 2.
NOTE 9 —DEBT:
The Company is party to a number of sale and leaseback transactions. The Company’s obligations under these transactions are secured
by, among other things, assignments of earnings and insurances and stock pledges and account charges in respect of the subject
vessels. The arrangements also contain customary events of default, including cross-default provisions as well as subjective
acceleration clauses under which the lessor could cancel the lease in the event of a material adverse change in the Company’s
business. For each arrangement, the Company evaluated whether, in substance, these transactions are leases or merely a form of
financing. As a result of this evaluation, we concluded that each agreement was a form of financing on the basis that each transaction
was a sale and leaseback transaction that did not meet the criteria for a sale under ASC 842 and ASC 606 due to the fixed price seller
repurchase options and/or mandatory seller repurchase obligations terms included in the arrangements. Accordingly, the cash
received in the transactions has been accounted for as a liability, and such arrangements have been recorded at amortized cost using
the effective interest method, with the corresponding vessels remaining on the consolidated balance sheet at cost, less accumulated
depreciation.
The balances in the following table reflect the amounts due under the Company’s secured debt facilities and secured lease financing
arrangements, net of any unamortized deferred financing fees or discounts/premiums:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
$750 Million Facility Term Loan, due 2027, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $3,124
$
—
$
110,474
$500 Million Revolving Credit Facility, due 2030
144,581
—
ING Credit Facility, due 2026, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $295
—
20,538
Ocean Yield Lease Financing, due 2031, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $2,154 and
$2,656
280,473
309,250
BoComm Lease Financing, due 2030, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $3,438 and
$4,166
216,343
229,583
Toshin Lease Financing, due 2031, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $243 and $302
12,510
13,903
Hyuga Lease Financing, due 2031, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $207 and $265
12,270
13,786
Kaiyo Lease Financing, due 2030, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $174 and $227
11,059
12,518
Kaisha Lease Financing, due 2030, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $183 and $238
11,171
12,624
688,407
722,676
Less current portion
(50,054)
(127,447)
Long-term portion
$
638,353
$
595,229
Capitalized terms used hereafter have the meaning given in these consolidated financial statements or in the respective transaction
documents referred to below, including subsequent amendments thereto.
$750 Million Credit Facility / $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility
On May 20, 2022, International Seaways Operating Corporation (“ISOC”), the borrower, and certain of their subsidiaries entered into
a credit agreement comprising $750 million of secured debt facilities (the “$750 Million Credit Facility”) with Nordea Bank Abp,
New York Branch (“Nordea”), Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (“CA-CIB”), BNP Paribas, DNB Markets Inc. and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (PUBL) (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners; Danish Ship
Finance A/S and ING Bank N.V., London Branch (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers; and National Australia
Bank Limited, as co-arranger. Nordea acted as administrative agent, collateral agent and security trustee under the credit agreement,
and CA-CIB acted as sustainability coordinator.
The $750 Million Credit Facility consisted of (i) a five-year senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $530
million (the “$750 Million Facility Term Loan”), and (ii) a five-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $220
million (the “$750 Million Facility Revolving Loan”) that amortized or reduced in 19 quarterly installments, beginning on November
20, 2022. The $750 Million Credit Facility was secured by (i) a first lien on 55 of the Company’s vessels at the time of the closing of
92
International Seaways, Inc.
the facility, along with their earnings and insurances, and (ii) liens on certain additional assets of ISOC. The maturity date of the $750
Million Credit Facility was May 20, 2027, and was subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain events (as described in the
credit agreement). The $750 Million Facility Term Loan contained an uncommitted accordion feature whereby, for a period of up to
24 months following the closing date, the amount of the loan thereunder could have been increased up to an additional incremental
$250 million (in increments of at least $10 million) for the acquisition of Additional Vessels, subject to certain conditions.
On May 24, 2022, the available amount of $530 million under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan was drawn in full, and $70 million
of the $220 million available under the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan was also drawn. The loan proceeds, together with
available cash, were used to repay (i) the $163 million outstanding principal balance under the $390 Million Credit Facility; (ii) the
$284 million outstanding principal balance under the $525 Million Credit Agreement; and (iii) the $127.8 million outstanding
principal balance under the $360 Million Credit Agreement; and to pay certain expenses related to the refinancing, including certain
structuring and arrangement fees, legal and administrative fees totaling $10.5 million.
Interest on the $750 Million Credit Facility was calculated based upon Adjusted Term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin. The
Applicable Margin at the inception of the facility was 2.40%. The facilities also included a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism.
The adjustment in pricing was linked to three factors:
a Fleet Sustainability Score Target, reflecting the carbon efficiency of the INSW fleet as it related to reductions in
CO2 emissions year-over-year, such that it aligned with the International Maritime Organization’s 50% industry reduction
target in GHG emissions by 2050, to be calculated in a manner consistent with the de-carbonization trajectory outlined in the
Poseidon Principles (the global framework by which financial institutions can assess the climate alignment of their ship
finance portfolios relative to established de-carbonization trajectories);
a Sustainability-Linked Investment Target, reflecting targeted spending of $3 million per annum on investments in energy
efficiency improvements, decarbonization, and other environmental, social and corporate governance-related initiatives; and
a Lost Time Incident Frequency Target, reflecting performance against a Lost Time Incident Frequency average published by
Intertanko.
The Company was required to deliver annually, commencing in July 2023, a sustainability certificate for the preceding calendar year
setting out the sustainability-related calculations required under the credit agreement. If the Company achieved all of the targets set
out in the credit agreement, the Applicable Margin would be decreased by 0.05% per annum, while if the Company failed to achieve
any of the targets set out in the credit agreement, the Applicable Margin would be increased by that same amount (but in no case
would any such adjustment result in the Applicable Margin being increased or decreased from the otherwise-applicable Applicable
Margin by more than 0.05% per annum in the aggregate).
The $750 Million Credit Facility contained customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable to the
Company, ISOC and the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries).
The sale and delivery of a 2008-built MR, which was pledged under the $750 Million Credit Facility, on November 30, 2022, resulted
in a mandatory principal prepayment of $5.8 million, reduced the number of vessels collateralizing the $750 Million Credit Facility to
54 vessels, and reduced the availability under the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan to $217.4 million.
On March 10, 2023, the Company entered into an amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility. Pursuant to the amendment, the
Company (a) prepaid $97 million of outstanding principal under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan; (b) obtained a release of
collateral vessel mortgages over 22 MR product carriers; (c) received from the lenders additional revolving credit commitments in an
aggregate amount of $40 million, which additional commitments constituted an increase to, and were subject to the same terms and
conditions as, the previously-existing revolving credit commitments; and (d) made certain other amendments to the credit agreement
and ancillary documents, including amendments relating to certain hedging obligations related to the credit agreement and to
repayment schedules. Following the effectiveness of the amendment, (a) the aggregate outstanding principal amount under the $750
Million Facility Term Loan was $366.3 million, and (b) the aggregate principal commitments available under the $750 Million
Facility Revolving Loan was $257.4 million (none of which was outstanding on December 31, 2023).
Following the amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility agreement and through December 31, 2023, the Company made an
additional $181.3 million in mandatory principal prepayments on the $750 Million Facility Term Loan in conjunction with the sale of
three 2008-built MRs, and the release of five Suezmaxes and one Aframax Tanker from the collateral package.
93
International Seaways, Inc.
On April 26, 2024, the Company, ISOC and certain of their subsidiaries entered into a second amendment that amended and extended
the $750 Million Credit Facility. Immediately prior to the closing of the second amendment, the $750 Million Facility, had a
remaining term loan balance of $94.6 million and undrawn revolver capacity of $257.4 million. The amended agreement consists of a
$500 million revolving credit facility (the “$500 Million Revolving Credit Facility”) that matures on January 31, 2030. That maturity
date is subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain events (as described in the credit agreement). The $500 Million
Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first lien on certain of the Company’s vessels (the “Collateral Vessels”), along with their
earnings, insurances and certain other assets, as well as by liens on certain additional assets of ISOC. Under the terms of the $500
Million Revolving Credit Facility capacity is reduced on a quarterly basis by approximately $12.8 million, based on a 20-year age-
adjusted profile of the Collateral Vessels. The $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility bears an interest rate based on term SOFR plus
the Applicable Margin (each as defined in the credit agreement). The Applicable Margin is 1.85% and is subject to similar
sustainability-linked features as included in the $750 Million Credit Facility, that are aimed at reducing the carbon footprint, targeting
expenditures toward energy efficiency improvements and maintaining a safety record above the industry average. The Company’s
performance against these sustainability measures could impact the margin by five basis points. At the time of closing, $94.6 million
was drawn on the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility.
Between the closing of the second amendment and December 31, 2024, an additional $120 million was drawn on the $500 Million
Revolving Credit Facility and $70 million subsequently repaid, leaving an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $144.6 million
and an undrawn revolver capacity of $329.8 million on this facility as of December 31, 2024. In February 2025, the Company repaid
$101.6 million of the outstanding principal balance under the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility.
The $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility also contains customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable
to the Company, the Borrower and the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries), including financial covenants
that are consistent with the financial covenants that existed in the $750 Million Credit Facility as further described below.
$160 Million Revolving Credit Facility
On September 27, 2023, the Company entered into a $160 million revolving credit agreement (the “$160 Million Revolving Credit
Facility”) with Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch (“Nordea”), ING Bank N.V., London Branch (“ING”), Crédit Agricole
Corporate & Investment Bank, and DNB Markets Inc. (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners; and
Danish Ship Finance A/S and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (PUBL) (or their respective affiliates), as lead arrangers. Nordea is
acting as administrative agent, collateral agent, coordinator and security trustee under the Revolving Credit Agreement, and ING is
acting as sustainability coordinator.
The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility comprises a 5.5-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of $160 million that
matures on March 27, 2029 and reduces on a 20-year age-adjusted profile. The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a
first lien on five of the Company’s vessels (the “Collateral Vessels”), along with their earnings, insurances and certain other assets, as
well as by liens on certain additional assets of the Borrower. Interest on the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility is calculated based
upon Term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin (each as defined in the credit agreement). The Applicable Margin was 1.90% and is
subject to a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism, pursuant to which the Applicable Margin may be decreased or increased by
0.075%, as described in greater detail below.
The sustainability-linked pricing adjustment is linked to three factors, which are consistent with those contained in the Company’s
$750 Million Credit Facility described above. The Company will be required to deliver annually, commencing for the period ending
June 30, 2024, a sustainability certificate for the preceding calendar year setting out its sustainability-related calculations. If the
Company achieves all of the targets set out in the credit agreement, the Applicable Margin will be decreased by 0.075% per annum,
while if it fails to achieve any of those targets the Applicable Margin will be increased by that same amount (but no such adjustment
will result in the Applicable Margin being increased or decreased from the otherwise-applicable Applicable Margin by more than
0.075% per annum in the aggregate). Based on the sustainability certificate submitted in July 2024, the Applicable Margin was
increased to 1.975%.
The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility also contains customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable
to the Company, the Borrower and the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries), including financial covenants
that are consistent with existing financial covenants in the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility, as further described below.
94
International Seaways, Inc.
On September 29, 2023, $50 million of the $160 million available under the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility was drawn for
general corporate purposes (including paying certain expenses related to the new financing). The $50 million was repaid in full on
October 30, 2023. The undrawn revolver capacity under this facility decreased to $144.9 million as of December 31, 2024.
ING Credit Facility
On November 12, 2021, the Company, together with its indirect subsidiaries Diamond S Shipping Inc. (together with the Company,
the “Guarantors”) and NT Suez One LLC, the borrower, entered into a credit agreement for a $25 million term loan facility with ING
Bank N.V., London Branch, as lender, administrative agent, collateral agent and security trustee (the “ING Credit Facility”). The ING
Credit Facility is secured by a first lien on the Suezmax owned by NT Suez One LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,
along with its earnings, insurances and certain other assets. The full $25 million was drawn down on November 12, 2021 and used to
repay approximately $22.0 million of outstanding and accrued interest under the maturing debt facility that previously financed the
Suezmax. The Company also incurred issuance and other debt financing costs of $0.6 million on this transaction. Interest on the loan
was based upon LIBOR plus a margin of 2%. The loan amortized in quarterly installments of approximately $0.5 million commencing
in February 2022 and was to mature on the fifth anniversary of the borrowing date in November 2026 with a final balloon payment
due at maturity in an amount equal to the remaining principal amount of the loan outstanding on that date. The maturity date was
subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain events as described in the ING Credit Facility. The ING Credit Facility was
amended on March 27, 2023, to change the reference rate from three-month LIBOR to an adjusted three-month Term SOFR rate,
effective on the May 12, 2023 interest rate reset date.
On April 18, 2024, the Company prepaid the outstanding principal balance of $20.3 million and terminated the ING Credit Facility.
Ocean Yield Lease Financing
On October 26, 2021, the Company entered into lease financing arrangements with Ocean Yield ASA for the sale and leaseback of the
six VLCCs that previously collateralized the Sinosure Credit Facility, for a total net sale price of $374.6 million (the “Ocean Yield
Lease Financing”). The proceeds from the transactions, which were received on November 8, 2021, were used to prepay the $228.4
million outstanding loan balance under the Sinosure Credit Facility, with the balance intended for general corporate purposes, which
included a $100.0 million voluntary prepayment on the $525 Million Facility Revolving Loan. The Company incurred issuance and
other debt financing costs of $3.9 million on this transaction. Under these lease financing arrangements, each of the six VLCCs is
subject to a 10-year bareboat charter with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and purchase
obligations at the end of the 10-year term equal to the outstanding principal balance of $82.5 million in total at that date. Charter hire
under these arrangements is comprised of a fixed monthly repayment amount aggregating $2.4 million plus a variable interest
component calculated based on three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 4.05%. The terms and conditions, including financial covenants,
of the arrangements are in-line with those within the Company’s existing debt facilities.
The lease financing arrangements with Ocean Yield were amended effective on February 21, 2023, to change the reference rate from
three-month LIBOR to an adjusted three-month Term SOFR rate, effective on the interest rate reset date on May 7, 2023.
BoComm Lease Financing Relating to Dual-Fuel LNG VLCC Newbuilds
On November 15, 2021, the Company and three of its vessel-owning indirect subsidiaries entered into a series of sale and leaseback
arrangements with entities affiliated with the Bank of Communications Limited (“BoComm”) in connection with the construction of
three dual-fuel LNG VLCC newbuilds (the “BoComm Lease Financing”). BoComm’s obligation to provide funding pursuant to the
terms of the sale and leaseback agreements commenced when construction began on the first vessel in November 2021. The three
newbuilds were delivered to the Company on March 7, 2023, April 11, 2023, and May 24, 2023, respectively. The BoComm Lease
Financing provided the funding of $244.8 million in aggregate ($81.6 million each vessel) over the course of the construction and
delivery of the three vessels. Under the lease financing arrangements, each vessel is subject to a seven-year bareboat charter
commencing on delivery of each vessel at a bareboat rate of $21,700 per day, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the
end of the second year.
Toshin Lease Financing
On December 7, 2021, the Company entered into lease financing arrangement with Toshin Co., Ltd (“Toshin”) for the sale and
leaseback of a 2012-built MR, which was a $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $17.1 million (the “Toshin
95
International Seaways, Inc.
Lease Financing”). The transaction generated $6.9 million net proceeds, after prepaying $10.2 million of the $390 Million Facility
Term Loan. The Company also incurred issuance and other debt financing costs of $0.4 million on this transaction. Under the lease
financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to a 10-year fixed rate bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of $6,200 per day for the first
three years, $6,000 per day for the second three years, and $5,700 per day for the last four years, with purchase options exercisable
commencing at the end of the fourth year and purchase obligation at the end of the 10-year term for $1.0 million.
COSCO Lease Financing
On December 23, 2021, the Company entered into lease financing arrangements with Oriental Fleet International Company Limited
(“COSCO Shipping”) for the sale and leaseback of an Aframax and an LR2, both $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessels, for a net
sale price of $54.0 million in total (the “COSCO Lease Financing”). The transactions generated $19.9 million net proceeds, after
prepaying $34.1 million of the $390 Million Facility Term Loan. The Company also incurred issuance and other debt financing costs
of $1.4 million on this transaction. Under these lease financing arrangements, each of the two vessels is subject to a seven-year
bareboat charter with purchase options exercisable commencing after the end of the second year and purchase obligations at the end of
the seven-year term equal to the outstanding principal balance of $18.9 million at that date. Charter hire under these arrangements is
comprised of a fixed quarterly repayment amount aggregating $1.3 million plus a variable interest component calculated based on
three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 3.90%. The terms and conditions, including financial covenants, of the arrangements are in-line
with those within the Company’s existing debt facilities.
In May 2023, the Company tendered notice of its intention to exercise its options to purchase one 2013-built Aframax and one 2014-
built LR2, which were bareboat chartered-in under the COSCO Lease Financing arrangements. The aggregate purchase price for the
two vessels of $46.4 million, consisted of the $45.2 million remaining debt balance and $1.2 million of purchase option premiums.
The transaction closed on July 3, 2023.
Hyuga Lease Financing
On January 14, 2022, the Company entered into a lease financing arrangement with Hyuga Kaiun Co., Ltd (“Hyuga”) for the sale and
leaseback of a 2011-built MR, which was a $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $16.7 million (the “Hyuga
Lease Financing”). The transaction generated net proceeds of $5.7 million, after prepaying $11.0 million of the $390 Million Facility
Term Loan. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to a nine-year bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of
$6,300 per day for the first three years, $6,200 per day for the second three years, and $6,000 per day for the last three years, with
purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and a $2.0 million purchase obligation at the end of the nine-
year term.
Kaiyo Lease Financing
On April 25, 2022, the Company entered into a lease financing arrangement with Kaiyo Ltd. (“Kaiyo”) for the sale and leaseback of a
2010-built MR, which was a $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $15.2 million (the “Kaiyo Lease
Financing”). The transaction generated net proceeds of $5.4 million, after prepaying $9.8 million of the $390 Million Facility Term
Loan. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to an eight-year bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of $6,250 per
day for the first four years, and $6,150 per day for the remaining four years, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end
of the fourth year and a $1.5 million purchase obligation at the end of the eight-year term.
Kaisha Lease Financing
On May 12, 2022, the Company entered into a lease financing arrangement with Kabushiki Kaisha (“Kaisha”) for the sale and
leaseback of a 2010-built MR, which was a $525 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $15.2 million (the “Kaisha
Lease Financing”). The transaction generated net proceeds of $10.6 million, after prepaying $4.6 million of the $525 Million Facility
Term Loan. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to an eight-year bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of
$6,250 per day for the first four years, and $6,150 per day for the remaining four years, with purchase options exercisable
commencing at the end of the fourth year and a $1.5 million purchase obligation at the end of the eight-year term.
96
International Seaways, Inc.
Debt Covenants
The Company was in compliance with the financial and non-financial covenants under all of its financing arrangements as of
December 31, 2024.
The $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility, $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility, and certain of the Company’s lease financing
arrangements contain customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable to the Company, the Borrower and
the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries), including financial covenants that require the Company (i) to
maintain a minimum liquidity level of the greater of $50 million and 5% of the Company’s Consolidated Indebtedness; (ii) to ensure
the Company’s and its consolidated subsidiaries’ Maximum Leverage Ratio will not exceed 0.60 to 1.00 at any time; (iii) to ensure
that Current Assets exceeds Current Liabilities (which is defined to exclude the current potion of Consolidated Indebtedness); and
(iv) to ensure the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Collateral Vessels will not be less than 135% of the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of each facility.
The Company’s credit facilities also require it to comply with a number of covenants, including the delivery of quarterly and annual
financial statements, budgets and annual projections; maintaining required insurances; compliance with laws (including
environmental); compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”); maintenance of flag and class of
the collateral vessels; restrictions on consolidations, mergers or sales of assets; limitations on liens; limitations on issuance of certain
equity interests; limitations on transactions with affiliates; and other customary covenants and related provisions.
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes interest expense before the impact of capitalized interest, including amortization of issuance and
deferred financing costs (for additional information related to deferred financing costs see Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies”),
commitment, administrative and other fees, recognized during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 with respect to the
Company’s debt facilities:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
$750 Million Credit Facility / $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility
$
2,337
$
18,351
$
18,558
$160 Million Revolving Credit Facility
2,881
616
—
ING Credit Facility(1)
518
1,734
1,054
Macquarie Credit Facility (2)
—
—
1,319
$390 Million Credit Facility(3)
—
—
3,346
$525 Million Credit Facility(3)(4)
(994)
(2,343)
1,568
$360 Million Credit Facility(2)
—
—
1,844
Sinosure Credit Facility(4)
1,703
1,974
2,254
Vessel Lease Financing Arrangements
43,454
46,748
30,223
8.5% Senior Notes(5)
—
—
1,473
Total debt related interest expense
$
49,899
$
67,080
$
61,639
(1) On April 18, 2024, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance of $20.3 million and terminated the ING Credit Facility.
(2) On November 17, 2022, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance of $17.8 million and terminated the Macquarie
Credit Facility.
(3) On May 24, 2022, the outstanding principal balances under the $390 Million Credit Facility, the $525 Million Credit Facility and
the $360 Million Credit Facility were repaid with proceeds from the $750 Million Credit Facility, as described above.
(4) The interest expense for these credit facilities includes the amortization for the terminated interest rate swap agreements, as
described in Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Fair Value Disclosures.”
(5) On August 5, 2022, the Company redeemed the $25 million aggregate principal outstanding of the 8.5% Senior Notes due June
2023.
97
International Seaways, Inc.
The following table summarizes interest paid, net of interest rate swap cash settlements, excluding deferred financing fees paid, during
the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 with respect to the Company’s debt facilities:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
$750 Million Credit Facility / $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility
$
1,800
$
19,798
$
13,892
$160 Million Revolving Credit Facility
—
311
—
ING Credit Facility
698
1,600
796
Macquarie Credit Facility
—
—
1,087
$390 Million Credit Facility
—
—
3,514
$525 Million Credit Facility
—
—
3,786
$360 Million Credit Facility
—
—
1,870
Vessel Lease Financing Arrangements
42,091
44,718
27,674
8.5% Senior Notes
—
—
1,274
Total debt related interest expense paid
$
44,589
$
66,427
$
53,893
Debt Modifications, Repurchases and Extinguishments
During the year ended December 31, 2023, in connection with the prepayment and extinguishment of certain of the Company’s debt
facilities, the Company recognized aggregate net losses of $4.0 million, which are included in other income in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. The net losses principally reflect (i) a $1.7 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs associated with the mandatory principal prepayments of the $750 Million Facility Term Loan; (ii) $1.1 million write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the prepayment of the COSCO Lease Financing described above; and (iii) $1.2
million in purchase option premium fees paid in conjunction with the prepayment of the COSCO Lease Financing.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, in connection with the prepayment and extinguishment of certain of the Company’s debt
facilities, the Company recognized an aggregate net loss of $1.3 million from the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs
associated with such facilities.
As of December 31, 2024, the aggregate annual principal payments required to be made on the Company’s financing arrangements are
as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
2025
$
50,054
2026
51,087
2027
51,970
2028
53,187
2029
54,103
Thereafter
434,405
Aggregate principal payments required
$
694,806
98
International Seaways, Inc.
NOTE 10 — ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023
Accounts payable
$
5,828 $
6,570
Accrued payroll and benefits
10,167
9,830
Accrued general and administrative expenses
1,525
1,974
Accrued vessel expenses
19,835
17,918
Accrued drydock, repairs and vessel betterment costs
10,108
5,208
Bunkers and lubricants
1,025
1,587
Insurance
96
85
Due to owners on chartered in vessels
902
925
EUAs due to authorities
4,990
—
Charter revenues received in advance
7,834
6,244
Accrued interest expense
1,018
2,114
Other
2,936
5,449
Total accounts payable, accrued expense and other current liabilities
$
66,264 $
57,904
NOTE 11 —TAXES:
Income taxes are provided for using the asset and liability method, such that income taxes are recorded based on amounts refundable
or payable in the current year and include the results of any differences in the basis of assets and liabilities between U.S. GAAP and
tax reporting. The Company derives substantially all of its gross income from the use and operation of vessels in international
commerce. The Company’s entities that own and operate vessels are primarily domiciled in the Marshall Islands and Liberia, which
do not impose income tax on offshore shipping operations. The Company also has or had subsidiaries in various jurisdictions that
performed administrative, commercial or technical management functions. These subsidiaries are subject to income taxes based on the
services performed in countries in which those particular offices are located and, accordingly, current and deferred income taxes are
recorded.
INSW, including its subsidiaries, is exempt from taxation on its U.S. source shipping income under Section 883 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and U.S. Treasury Department regulations. INSW qualified for this exemption
because its common shares were treated as primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States or
another qualified country and for more than half of the days in the taxable year ended December 31, 2024, less than 50 percent of the
total vote and value of the Company’s stock was held in the aggregate by one or more shareholders who each owned 5% or more of
the vote and value of the Company’s stock. Beginning in 2025, to the extent INSW is unable to qualify for exemption from tax under
Section 883, INSW will be subject to U.S. federal taxation of 4% of its U.S. source shipping income on a gross basis without the
benefit of deductions. Shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end,
in the U.S. will be considered to be 50% derived from sources within the U.S. Shipping income attributable to transportation that both
begins and ends in the U.S. will be considered to be 100% derived from sources within the U.S. INSW does not engage in
transportation that gives rise to 100% U.S. source income. Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-
U.S. ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the U.S. Shipping income derived from sources outside the
U.S. will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax. INSW’s vessels operate in various parts of the world, including to or from
U.S. ports. There can be no assurance that INSW will continue to qualify for the Section 883 exemption.
A substantial portion of income earned by INSW is not subject to income tax, and no deferred taxes are provided on the temporary
differences between the tax and financial statement basis of the underlying assets and liabilities for those subsidiaries not subject to
income tax in their respective countries of incorporation. Additionally, a number of countries have drafted or are actively considering
drafting legislation to implement the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (“OECD”) international tax
framework, including the Pillar Two Model Rules. These model rules call for a minimum global tax of 15% on large multinational
enterprises with possible application from January 1, 2024 or later. As currently enacted, the Pillar Two Model Rules have no impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in 2024, however, the Company is monitoring these developments and evaluating
the necessary steps it can take to minimize the impact, if any, to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and operations
going forward.
The Marshall Islands and Liberia impose tonnage taxes, which are assessed on the tonnage of certain of the Company’s vessels. These
tonnage taxes are included in vessel expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
99
International Seaways, Inc.
The components of the income tax benefit/(provision) are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Current
$
1,084
$
(3,878)
$
(97)
Deferred
—
—
9
Income tax benefit/(provision)
$
1,084
$
(3,878)
$
(88)
Included in the Company's current income tax benefit/(provision) are benefits and provisions for uncertain tax positions relating to
freight taxes in various tax jurisdictions. The Company reviews its freight tax obligations on a regular basis and may update its
assessment of its tax positions based on available information at that time. Such information may include additional legal advice as to
the applicability of freight taxes in relevant jurisdictions. Freight tax regulations are subject to change and interpretation; therefore, the
amounts recorded by the Company may change accordingly. During 2024, the Company decreased its reserve for uncertain tax
liabilities for these jurisdictions by $1.1 million. The Company does not presently anticipate that its provisions for these uncertain tax
positions will significantly increase in the next 12 months; however, this is dependent on the jurisdictions in which vessel trading
activity occurs.
The differences between income taxes expected at the Marshall Islands statutory income tax rate of zero percent and the reported
income tax benefit/(provision) are summarized as follows:
2024
2023
2022
Change in valuation allowance
(0.10)%
- %
0.04 %
Unrecognized tax benefits
(0.26)%
0.69 %
0.10 %
Income subject to tax in other jurisdictions
0.10 %
- %
(0.12)%
Effective income tax rate
(0.26)%
0.69 %
0.02 %
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) of $3.4
million and $4.5 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which are included in other current and other non-current
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1,
$
4,521
$
970
Increases for positions taken in current year
249
3,551
Decreases for positions taken in prior years
(1,358)
—
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,
$
3,412
$
4,521
The Company records interest on unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes. Accrued interest is included in other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company had a total liability for interest of $1.0 million as of December 31, 2024
and 2023, respectively.
At December 31, 2023, the Company believed that it was more likely than not that the benefit from its net operating loss
carryforwards and certain other deferred tax assets associated with subsidiaries that it had in the United Kingdom and Singapore
would not be realized and accordingly, maintained a valuation allowance of $7.0 million. Such subsidiaries were liquidated during
2024, and the unutilized deferred tax assets and valuation allowances were de-recognized. The significant components of the
Company’s deferred tax assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
100
International Seaways, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards
$
— $
3,180
Excess of tax over book basis of depreciable assets
—
806
Pensions
—
3,039
Total deferred tax assets
—
7,025
Less: Valuation allowance
—
(7,025)
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets
$
— $
—
NOTE 12 — CAPITAL STOCK AND STOCK COMPENSATION:
Rights Agreement
On May 8, 2022, the Company entered into a shareholder rights plan in the form of a Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”),
dated as of May 8, 2022, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent. The Rights Agreement was
approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. In connection with the Rights Agreement, the Company’s Board of Directors
authorized and declared a dividend distribution of one right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of common stock, no par value, of
the Company. The dividend was payable on May 19, 2022 to stockholders of record at the close of business on such date. While the
Rights Agreement was effective immediately, the Rights would become exercisable only if a person or group acquired beneficial
ownership, as defined in the Rights Agreement, of 17.5% or more of the Company’s common stock in a transaction not approved by
the Company's Board of Directors. In that situation, each holder of a Right (other than the acquiring person or group) would have the
right to purchase, upon payment of the then-current exercise price, a number of shares of Company common stock having a market
value of twice the exercise price of the Right. In addition, at any time after a person or group acquired 17.5% or more of the
Company’s common stock (unless such person or group acquires 50% or more), the Company’s Board of Directors could exchange
one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding Right (other than Rights owned by such person or group, which
would have become null and void). The expiry date of the Rights Agreement was May 7, 2023.
On April 11, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Amended and Restated the Rights Agreement (the “A&R Rights
Agreement”), which amends and restates the Rights Agreement dated as of May 8, 2022. The A&R Rights Agreement implements
substantially the same features and protective measures of the Rights Agreements and includes the following revised or additional
provisions:
(i)
extends the expiration date from May 7, 2023 to April 10, 2026;
(ii)
increases the “Acquiring Person” trigger threshold from 17.5% to 20%;
(iii)
increases the “Purchase Price” from $25 to $50; and
(iv)
includes a qualifying offer provision with a shareholder redemption feature.
The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Rights Agreement and the A&R Rights Agreement to enable all stockholders of the
Company to realize the full potential value of their investment in the Company. The A&R Rights Agreement is designed to prevent
any individual stockholder or group of stockholders from gaining control of the Company through open market accumulation without
paying a control premium to all stockholders or by otherwise disadvantaging other stockholders. The A&R Rights Agreement is not
intended to prevent a takeover or deter fair offers for securities of the Company that deliver value to all stockholders on an equal basis.
It is designed, instead, to encourage anyone seeking to acquire the Company to negotiate with the Board prior to attempting a
takeover.
The Company’s Board of Directors may consider an earlier termination of the A&R Rights Agreement if market and other conditions
warrant.
Dividends
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $284.4
million or $5.77 per share declared by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows:
101
International Seaways, Inc.
Declaration Date
Record Date
Payment Date
Regular Quarterly
Dividend per Share
Supplemental
Dividend per Share
Total Dividends
Declared
(Dollars in
Thousands)
February 28, 2024
March 14, 2024
March 28, 2024
$
0.12
$
1.20
$
64,665
May 7, 2024
June 12, 2024
June 26, 2024
$
0.12
$
1.63
$
86,930
August 6, 2024
September 11, 2024 September 25, 2024 $
0.12
$
1.38
$
73,789
November 6, 2024
December 13, 2024 December 27, 2024
$
0.12
$
1.08
$
59,031
On February 26, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of common
stock and a supplemental dividend of $0.58 per share of common stock. Both dividends will be paid on March 28, 2025 to
shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2025.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $308.2
million or $6.29 per share declared by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows:
Declaration Date
Record Date
Payment Date
Regular Quarterly
Dividend per Share
Supplemental
Dividend per Share
Total Dividends
Declared
(Dollars in
Thousands)
February 27, 2023
March 14, 2023
March 28, 2023
$
0.12
$
1.88
$
98,321
May 4, 2023
June 14, 2023
June 28, 2023
$
0.12
$
1.50
$
79,259
August 8, 2023
September 13, 2023 September 27, 2023 $
0.12
$
1.30
$
69,428
November 6, 2023
December 13, 2023 December 27, 2023
$
0.12
$
1.13
$
61,157
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid regular quarterly cash dividends totaling $69.8 million or $1.42 per
share declared by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows:
Declaration Date
Record Date
Payment Date
Regular Quarterly
Dividend per Share
Supplemental
Dividend per Share
Total Dividends
Declared
(Dollars in
Thousands)
February 28, 2022
March 14, 2022
March 28, 2022
$
0.06
$
—
$
2,978
June 7, 2022
June 17, 2022
June 29, 2022
$
0.12
$
—
$
5,964
August 4, 2022
September 14, 2022 September 28, 2022 $
0.12
$
—
$
5,886
November 7, 2022
December 8, 2022
December 22, 2022
$
0.12
$
1.00
$
55,015
Share Repurchases
The Company has had a stock repurchase program since 2017. Under the program, the Company can opportunistically repurchase
shares of the Company’s common stock (up to the authorized program limits) from time to time, on the open market or otherwise, in
such quantities, at such prices, in such manner and on such terms and conditions as management determined was in the best interests
of the Company. Shares owned by employees, directors and other affiliates of the Company are not eligible for repurchase under this
program without further authorization from the Board.
The following is a summary of the purchases, excluding commissions, made under the Company’s stock repurchase program during
the three years ended December 31, 2024:
Year-ended December 31,
Total shares repurchased
Average Price per share
Total Cost
(In thousands)
2024
501,646
$49.81
$
24,985
2023
366,483
$38.03
$
13,937
2022
687,740
$29.08
$
20,000
102
International Seaways, Inc.
In November 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program to $50.0 million from
$25.0 million, which was the remaining authorization after the open-market purchases made during the third quarter of 2024.
In connection with the settlement of vested restricted stock units and the exercise of stock options, the Company repurchased 158,591,
147,294 and 513,479 shares of common stock during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 at an average cost of $53.42,
$44.09 and $41.79 per share, respectively (based on the market prices on the dates of vesting or option exercise), from employees,
including certain members of management to cover withholding taxes and the cost of options exercised.
Share-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock compensation expense in accordance with the fair value based methods required by ASC 718,
Compensation – Stock Compensation. Such fair value based methods require share based payment transactions to be measured based
on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.
Effective November 18, 2016, INSW adopted incentive compensation plans (the “Incentive Plans” as further described below) in
order to facilitate the grant of equity and cash incentives to directors, employees, including executive officers and consultants of the
Company and certain of its affiliates and to enable the Company and certain of its affiliates to obtain and retain the services of these
individuals, which is essential to our long-term success. INSW reserved 2,000,000 shares for issuance under its management incentive
plan and 400,000 shares for issuance under its non-employee director incentive compensation plan. Effective June 22, 2020, INSW
adopted new Incentive Plans and reserved an additional 1,400,000 shares for issuance under its management incentive plan and
400,000 shares for issuance under its non-employee director incentive compensation plan.
Information regarding share-based compensation awards granted by INSW follows:
Director Compensation – Restricted Common Stock
INSW awarded a total of 21,818, 26,878 and 41,718 restricted common stock shares during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023
and 2022, respectively, to its non-employee directors. The weighted average fair value of INSW’s stock on the measurement date of
such awards was $55.40 (2024), $37.94 (2023) and $24.45 (2022) per share. Such restricted shares awards vest in full on the earlier of
the next annual meeting of the stockholders or grant anniversary date, subject to each director continuing to provide services to INSW
through such date. The restricted share awards granted may not be transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered prior to
vesting. Prior to the vesting date, a holder of restricted share awards has all the rights of a shareholder of INSW, including the right to
vote such shares and the right to receive dividends paid with respect to such shares at the same time as common shareholders
generally.
On February 19, 2024, Mr. Nadim Qureshi resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Qureshi’s resignation was not
the result of any disagreement with the Company or the Board on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or
practices. In connection with his resignation, the Board approved the accelerated vesting of the 2,635 restricted shares of INSW
common stock previously granted to Mr. Qureshi in June 2023 (valued at approximately $0.1 million) and the Company did not seek
reimbursement of any cash director fees paid to Mr. Qureshi in advance for the first quarter of 2024. In consideration of this action,
Mr. Qureshi entered into a one-year agreement not to compete with the Company’s crude and product tanker operations.
On November 22, 2024, Mr. Douglas Wheat resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company, and from his role as Chairman of
the Board, both with immediate effect. Mr. Wheat’s resignation was not the result of any disagreement with the Company or the Board
on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. In recognition of his transformational years of service,
following his resignation, the Board appointed Mr. Wheat to the honorary position of Chairman Emeritus. In connection with Mr.
Wheat’s resignation, the Board approved the accelerated vesting of the 4,110 restricted shares of INSW common stock previously
granted to him in June 2024 (valued at approximately $0.1 million) and the Company did not seek reimbursement of any cash director
fees paid to Mr. Wheat in advance for the fourth quarter of 2024. Further, in connection with Mr. Wheat’s retirement from the Board
and appointment as Chairman Emeritus, on November 27, 2024, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting
Agreement”) with Mr. Wheat. The Consulting Agreement continues in force so long as Mr. Wheat holds the title of Chairman
Emeritus and may not be terminated by Mr. Wheat until after November 23, 2025 (upon four weeks’ notice) (such period, the
“Term”). During the Term, Mr. Wheat will be an independent contractor of the Company and will be available to provide consulting
services to the Board and the Chief Executive Officer on an as-needed basis. For his service during the Term, Mr. Wheat will be paid
a consulting fee $0.5 million in two equal installments, the first of which was paid in December 2024, and the second to be paid in
103
International Seaways, Inc.
March 2025. The Consulting Agreement also contains customary confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions, and the Company
may terminate the agreement if Mr. Wheat provides services to any competitor of the Company during the Term.
Management Compensation
(i) Restricted Stock Units
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company awarded 82,076, 52,890 and 348,846 time-based restricted
stock units (“RSUs”) to certain of its employees, including senior officers, respectively. The average grant date fair value of these
awards was $52.99 (2024), $51.37 (2023) and $21.05 (2022) per RSU. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of
INSW common stock upon vesting. 48,078 of the RSUs awarded during the year ended December 31, 2024 will vest in equal
installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date and 33,998 of the RSUs awarded will cliff vest on October 24,
2025.
RSUs may not be transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered until they are settled. Settlement of vested RSUs may be in
either shares of common stock or cash, as determined at the discretion of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and
shall occur as soon as practicable after the vesting date. If the RSUs are settled in shares of common stock, following the settlement of
such shares, the grantee will be the record owner of the shares of common stock and will have all the rights of a shareholder of the
Company, including the right to vote such shares and the right to receive dividends paid with respect to such shares of common stock.
RSUs which have not become vested as of the date of a grantee’s termination from the Company will be forfeited without the payment
of any consideration, unless otherwise provided for.
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company awarded 48,080, 52,890 and 124,590, respectively,
performance-based RSUs to its senior officers and employees. The weighted average grant date fair value of the awards with
performance conditions was determined to be $52.57 (2024), $51.37 (2023) and $19.63 (2022) per RSU. The weighted average grant
date fair value of the TSR (as defined below) based performance awards, which have a market condition, was estimated using a Monte
Carlo probability model and determined to be $41.08 (2024), $53.65 (2023) and $20.65 (2022) per RSU. Each performance stock unit
represents a contingent right to receive RSUs based upon the covered employees being continuously employed through the end of the
period over which the performance goals are measured and shall vest as follows: (i) one-half of the target RSUs shall vest on the third
fiscal year end date following the grant date, subject to INSW’s return on invested capital (“ROIC”) performance in the three-year
ROIC performance period relative to a target rate (the “ROIC Target”) set forth in the award agreements; and (ii) one-half of the target
RSUs shall vest on the third fiscal year end date following the grant date, subject to INSW’s three-year total shareholder return
(“TSR”) performance relative to that of a performance peer group over a three-year performance period (“TSR Target”). Vesting is
subject in each case to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors’ certification of
achievement of the performance measures and targets no later than March 15th of the year following the vesting date. The TSR Target
and the ROIC Target in the 2022 award were achieved at a payout of 100% and 150%, respectively, of target as of the performance
period end date of December 31, 2024.
Settlement of the vested INSW performance-based RSUs may be in either shares of common stock or cash, as determined by the
Human Resources and Compensation Committee in its discretion, and shall occur as soon as practicable after the vesting date.
104
International Seaways, Inc.
Activity with respect to restricted common stock and restricted stock units under INSW compensation plans is summarized as follows:
Common Stock
Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2021
336,041
Granted (2)
531,246
Forfeitures (3)
—
Vested ($17.21 - $23.53 per share) (1)
(216,889)
Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2022
650,398
Granted (2)
148,891
Forfeitures (3)
(3,641)
Vested ($19.63 - $43.05 per share) (1)
(311,004)
Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2023
484,644
Granted (2)
183,118
Forfeitures (3)
—
Vested ($19.63 - $57.17 per share) (1)
(330,186)
Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2024
337,576
(1) Includes 112,177 (2024), 147,294 (2023) and 74,360 (2022) shares of common stock sold back to the Company by employees to
cover withholding taxes in the year of vesting or during the first quarter of the subsequent year.
(2) Includes 31,144, 16,233 and 16,092 incremental performance restricted stock units earned as a result of above target achievement
of market condition at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(3) Represents restricted stock units forfeited because performance targets or service requirements were not achieved as of the
measurement date.
(ii) Stock Options
Activity with respect to stock options under INSW compensation plans is summarized as follows:
Common Stock
Options Outstanding at December 31, 2021
811,906
Granted
—
Exercised
(541,656)
Options Outstanding at December 31, 2022
270,250
Granted
—
Exercised
(30,654)
Options Outstanding at December 31, 2023
239,596
Granted
—
Exercised
(65,179)
Options Outstanding at December 31, 2024
174,417
Options Exercisable at December 31, 2024
174,417
There were no stock options granted during 2024, 2023 and 2022. The outstanding stock options expire on the business day
immediately preceding the tenth anniversary of the award date. If a stock option grantee’s employment is terminated for cause (as
defined in the applicable Form of Grant Agreement), stock options (whether then vested or exercisable or not) will lapse and will not
be exercisable. If a stock option grantee’s employment is terminated for reasons other than cause, the option recipient may exercise the
vested portion of the stock option but only within such period of time ending on the earlier to occur of (i) the 90th day ending after the
option recipient’s employment terminated and (ii) the expiration of the options, provided that if the Optionee’s employment terminates
for death or disability the vested portion of the option may be exercised until the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of employment
termination and (ii) the expiration date of the options.
The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding and exercisable stock options at December 31, 2024 was
4.81 years. The range of exercise prices of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2024 was between $17.21
and $21.93 per share. The weighted average exercise price of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2024 was
$19.93. The aggregate intrinsic value of the INSW stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2024 was $2.8 million.
105
International Seaways, Inc.
Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period applicable to each grant, using the straight-line method.
Compensation expense with respect to restricted common stock and restricted stock units outstanding for the years ended
December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $8.9 million, $7.9 million and $5.5 million, respectively. Compensation expense relating to
stock options for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $0.1 million, $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2024, there was $7.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to INSW nonvested share-based
compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.44 years.
NOTE 13 —ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS):
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of related taxes, in the consolidated balance sheets follow:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments
$
5,176 $
9,349
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost (pension plans)
(13,037)
(10,412)
$
(7,861) $
(1,063)
The following tables present the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of
related taxes, for the three years ended December 31, 2024.
(Dollars in thousands)
Unrealized
gains/(losses) on
cash flow hedges
Items not yet recognized
as a component of net
periodic benefit cost
(pension plans)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2021
$
(4,863)
$
(7,497)
$
(12,360)
Current period change, excluding amounts reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
22,905
(2,759)
20,146
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss)
(1,130)
308
(822)
Balance at December 31, 2022
16,912
(9,948)
6,964
Current period change, excluding amounts reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
3,187
(1,043)
2,144
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss)
(10,750)
579
(10,171)
Balance at December 31, 2023
9,349
(10,412)
(1,063)
Current period change, excluding amounts reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
3,532
(2,625)
907
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss)
(7,705)
—
(7,705)
Balance at December 31, 2024
$
5,176
$
(13,037)
$
(7,861)
106
International Seaways, Inc.
The following table presents information with respect to amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
for the three years ended December 31, 2024.
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Statement of
Operations
Line Item
Reclassifications of (gains)/losses on cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps entered into by the Company's equity method
Equity in result of
joint venture investees
$
— $
— $
130 affiliated companies
Interest rate swaps entered into by the Company's subsidiaries
(6,885)
(8,601)
(1,044) Interest expense
Reclassifications of (gains)/losses on discontinued hedging instruments
Interest rate swap entered into by the Company's subsidiaries
(820)
(2,149)
(216) Interest expense
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost
(pension plans):
Net periodic benefit costs associated with pension and
postretirement benefit plans
—
579
308 Other expense
Total before and net of tax
$
(7,705) $
(10,171) $
(822)
The following amounts are included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) at December 31, 2024, which have not yet
been recognized in net periodic cost: unrecognized prior service costs of $2.1 million ($1.7 million net of tax) and unrecognized
actuarial losses of $12.7 million ($11.3 million net of tax). As discussed above in Note 11, “Taxes,” the Company’s wholly owned
U.K. subsidiary was liquidated in 2024, and all deferred taxes and valuation allowances associated with the entity were derecognized.
The defined benefit pension plan obligation and assets of the U.K. subsidiary remain with the Company and in accordance with
relevant accounting guidance, the tax effects remaining in accumulated other comprehensive loss will not be reclassified to earnings
until the pension plan is settled, as further described in Note 16, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.”
At December 31, 2024, the Company expects that it will reclassify $2.2 million (gross and net of tax) of net gain on derivative
instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) to earnings during the next twelve months due to the payment of
variable rate interest associated with floating rate debt of INSW’s equity method investees and the interest rate swaps held by the
Company.
See Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Fair Value,” for additional disclosures relating to derivative
instruments.
NOTE 14 — REVENUE:
Revenue Recognition
The majority of the Company’s contracts for pool revenues, time and bareboat charter revenues, and voyage charter revenues are
accounted for as lease revenue under ASC 842. The Company’s contracts with pools are short term which are cancellable with up to
90 days' notice. As of December 31, 2024, the Company is a party to time charter out contracts with customers on three VLCCs, one
Suezmax, one Aframax, one LR2, and eight MRs with expiry dates ranging from February 2025 to April 2030. The Company’s
contracts with customers for voyage charters are short term and vary in length based upon the duration of each voyage. Lease revenue
for non-variable lease payments is recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis and lease revenue for variable lease
payments (e.g., demurrage) are recognized in the period in which the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease
payments are based occur. See Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies,” for additional detail on the Company’s accounting policies
regarding revenue recognition for leases.
Lightering services provided by the Company’s Crude Tanker Lightering Business and voyage charter contracts that do not meet the
definition of a lease are accounted for as service revenues under ASC 606. In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when a
customer obtains control of or consumes promised services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the
Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these services. See Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies,” for additional
detail on the Company’s accounting policies regarding service revenue recognition and costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.
107
International Seaways, Inc.
The following table presents the Company’s revenues from leases accounted for under ASC 842 and revenues from services
accounted for under ASC 606 for the three years ended December 31, 2024:
Crude
Product
(Dollars in thousands)
Tankers
Carriers
Totals
2024
Revenues from leases
Pool revenues
$
314,018
$
435,146
$
749,164
Time and bareboat charter revenues
77,420
59,699
137,119
Voyage charter revenues from non-variable lease payments
4,983
5,417
10,400
Revenues from services
Voyage charter revenues from lightering services
54,930
—
54,930
Total shipping revenues
$
451,351
$
500,262
$
951,613
2023
Revenues from leases
Pool revenues
$
399,904
$
505,904
$
905,808
Time and bareboat charter revenues
67,883
28,661
96,544
Voyage charter revenues from non-variable lease payments
7,860
12,688
20,548
Voyage charter revenues from variable lease payments
66
516
582
Revenues from services
Voyage charter revenues from lightering services
48,293
—
48,293
Total shipping revenues
$
524,006
$
547,769
$
1,071,775
2022
Revenues from leases
Pool revenues
$
262,170
$
512,752
$
774,922
Time and bareboat charter revenues
23,633
9,401
33,034
Voyage charter revenues from non-variable lease payments(1)
8,451
11,149
19,600
Voyage charter revenues from variable lease payments
62
(336)
(274)
Revenues from services
Voyage charter revenues from lightering services
37,383
—
37,383
Total shipping revenues
$
331,699
$
532,966
$
864,665
(1) Includes $1.8 million of loss of hire claim proceeds received during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Contract Balances
The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers, and
significant changes in contract assets and liabilities balances, associated with revenue from services accounted for under ASC 606.
Balances related to revenues from leases accounted for under ASC 842 are excluded from the table below.
(Dollars in thousands)
Voyage
receivables -
Billed
receivables
Contract assets
(Unbilled voyage
receivables)
Contract
liabilities
(Deferred
revenues and off
hires)
Opening balance as of January 1, 2024
$
6,512
$
1,029
$
—
Closing balance as of December 31, 2024
4,086
258
—
We receive payments from customers based on the schedule established in our contracts. Contract assets relate to our conditional right
to consideration for our completed performance obligations under contracts and decrease when the right to consideration becomes
unconditional or payments are received. Contract liabilities include payments received in advance of performance under contracts and
are recognized when performance under the respective contract has been completed. Deferred revenues allocated to unsatisfied
performance obligations will be recognized over time as the services are performed.
108
International Seaways, Inc.
Performance Obligations
All of the Company’s performance obligations, and associated revenue, are generally transferred to customers over time. The expected
duration of services is less than one year. There were no material adjustments to revenues from performance obligations satisfied in
previous periods recognized during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract
As of December 31, 2024, there were no unamortized deferred costs of obtaining or fulfilling a contract.
European Union’s Emissions Trading System
Commencing January 1, 2024, the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (“EU ETS”) was extended to cover Carbon dioxide
(“CO2”) emissions from ships over 5,000 gross tons entering EU ports. The EU ETS covers (a) 50% of emissions from voyages either
starting in or ending in an EU port, and (b) 100% of emissions from voyages between two EU ports or emissions generated while a
ship is within an EU port.
Shipping companies will have to surrender EU ETS emissions allowances (“EUA”) for each ton of reported CO2 emissions in the
scope of the EU ETS. There is a phase-in period for the regulations, as allowances will have to be submitted for 40% of 2024
emissions, 70% of 2025 emissions and 100% of emissions for 2026 and subsequent years. Beginning in 2026, the scope of the EU
ETS will also be expanded to include Methane (“CH4”) and Nitrous oxide (“N2O”).
EUAs are valued based upon a market approach utilizing prices published on an EUA market index. The value of the EUAs to be
provided to the Company pursuant to the terms of its agreements with the charterers of its vessels and the commercial pools in which
it participates is included in shipping revenues in the consolidated statements of operations. The value of the EUA obligations incurred
by the Company under the EU ETS while its vessels are on-hire is included in voyage expenses, or in vessel expenses while its vessels
are off-hire, in the consolidated statements of operations.
EUAs held by the Company are intended to be used to settle its EUA obligations and are accounted for as intangible assets. The
Company did not hold any EUAs as of December 31, 2024. EUAs relating to 2024 emissions are required to be surrendered to the EU
authorities in September 2025.
The following table presents the components of the non-cash revenues and expenses recognized for EUAs earned and incurred during
the year ended December 31, 2024:
(Dollars in thousands)
Pool revenues
$
3,493
Time charter revenues
1,497
Total shipping revenues
$
4,990
Voyage expenses
$
4,990
The value of EUAs due to the Company from its charterers or commercial pools in which it participates, and the value of the EUAs
the Company is obligated to surrender to the EU authorities of $5.0 million as of December 31, 2024 is included in the other
receivables and other current liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE 15 — LEASES:
As permitted under ASC 842, the Company has elected not to apply the provisions of ASC 842 to short term leases, which include: (i)
tanker vessels chartered-in where the duration of the charter was one year or less at inception; (ii) workboats employed in the Crude
Tankers Lightering business which have a noncancelable lease term of 12-months or less; and (iii) short term leases of office and other
space.
109
International Seaways, Inc.
Contracts under which the Company is a Lessee
The Company currently has two major categories of leases – chartered-in vessels and leased office and other space. The expenses
recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2024 for the lease component of these leases are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Operating lease cost
Vessel assets
Charter hire expenses
$
11,977
$
6,192
$
9,935
Finance lease cost
Vessel assets
Amortization of right-of-use assets
—
731
196
Interest on lease liabilities
—
124
34
Office and other space
General and administrative
904
869
911
Voyage expenses
180
180
172
Short-term lease cost
Vessel assets (1)
Charter hire expenses
4,784
18,679
8,636
Total lease cost
$
17,845
$
26,775
$
19,884
(1) Excludes vessels and workboats spot chartered-in under operating leases and employed in the Crude Tankers Lightering business
for periods of less than one month each, totaling $4.0 million, $2.1 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31,
2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, including both lease and non-lease components.
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows used for operating leases
$
13,240
$
6,028
$
10,207
Finance cash flows used for finance leases
—
42,284
533
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023
Operating lease right-of-use assets
$
21,229 $
20,391
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
$
(14,617) $
(10,223)
Long-term operating lease liabilities
(8,715)
(11,631)
Total operating lease liabilities
$
(23,332) $
(21,854)
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases
3.37 years
4.42 years
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases
5.51%
5.90%
110
International Seaways, Inc.
1. Charters-in of vessel assets:
As of December 31, 2024, the Company has commitments to time charter-in two LR1s for periods ending between June 2025 and
March 2026. The minimum lease liabilities and related number of operating days under this operating lease as of December 31, 2024
are as follows:
Time Charters-in
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Operating Days
2025
$
14,180
528
2026
1,949
72
Total lease payments (lease component only)
16,129
600
less imputed interest
(426)
Total operating lease liabilities
$
15,703
2. Office and other space:
The Company has operating leases for office space. These leases have expiry dates ranging from November 2026 to May 2033.
Payments of lease liabilities for office and other space as of December 31, 2024 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
2025
$
1,093
2026
1,113
2027
1,077
2028
1,077
2029
1,077
Thereafter
3,678
Total lease payments
9,115
less imputed interest
(1,486)
Total operating lease liabilities
$
7,629
Contracts under which the Company is a Lessor
See Note 14, “Revenue,” for discussion on the Company’s revenues from operating leases accounted for under ASC 842.
The future minimum revenues, before reduction for brokerage commissions, expected to be received on non-cancelable time charters
for three VLCCs, one Suezmax, one Aframax, one LR2, and eight MRs and the related revenue days as of December 31, 2024 are as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Revenue Days
2025
$
115,548
4,157
2026
79,611
2,699
2027
39,433
1,259
2028
34,038
1,098
2029
33,945
1,095
Thereafter
7,068
228
Future minimum revenues
$
309,643
10,536
Future minimum contracted revenues do not include the Company’s share of time charters entered into by the pools in which it
participates or profit-sharing above the base rate on the newbuild dual-fuel LNG VLCCs. Revenues from a time charter are not
generally received when a vessel is off-hire, including time required for normal periodic maintenance of the vessel. In arriving at the
111
International Seaways, Inc.
minimum future charter revenues, an estimated time off-hire to perform periodic maintenance on each vessel has been deducted,
although there is no assurance that such estimate will be reflective of the actual off-hire in the future.
NOTE 16 —PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS:
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
In September 2024, the Company contributed $3.6 million into the OSG Ship Management (UK) Ltd. Retirement Benefits Plan (the
“Plan”) to allow the Trustee of the Plan to purchase a $21.0 million insurance contract tailored to match the full value of future Plan
benefits payable from the Plan. In this arrangement, the Company’s pension benefit obligation and related risks and rewards are not
transferred to the insurance company, and as a result, the Company continues to be responsible for paying the benefits. However, this
arrangement generally constitutes an economic settlement of the liability by eliminating relevant risks associated with changes to the
obligation, including investment, interest rate and longevity risk. The contract is accounted for as a plan asset in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. As this arrangement does not qualify for settlement accounting under ASC 715,
Compensation – Retirement Benefits, the corresponding obligation is netted against the plan asset in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet.
The Company expects the benefits due to the participants under the Plan to be transferred to the insurance company in approximately
thirty to thirty-six months after the completion of their standard review of the Plan’s underlying data with minimal additional cost to
the Company. At such time, the Company believes the arrangement will qualify for settlement accounting.
Information with respect to the Plan for which INSW uses a December 31 measurement date, is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
17,876 $
16,753
Interest cost on benefit obligation
797
827
Actuarial losses
1,233
265
Benefits paid
(890)
(848)
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses
(296)
879
Benefit obligation at year end
18,720
17,876
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
17,703
16,833
Actual return on plan assets
(1,373)
839
Employer contributions
3,649
—
Benefits paid
(890)
(848)
Foreign exchange (losses)/gains
(410)
879
Fair value of plan assets at year end
18,679
17,703
Unfunded status at December 31
$
(41) $
(173)
The unfunded benefit obligation for the pension plan included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets,
represents the actuarial estimate of the portion of the pension plan benefit obligation that is not covered by the insurance contract
purchased by the Plan. At the completion of the insurance company’s standard review of the underlying data, an additional premium
cost may be incurred to cover this benefit obligation but as discussed above, such additional cost is expected to be minimal.
112
International Seaways, Inc.
Information for net periodic benefit cost/(income) for the three years ended December 31, 2024 follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Components of expense:
Interest cost on benefit obligation
$
797
$
827
$
442
Expected return on plan assets
(914)
(1,080)
(955)
Amortization of prior-service costs
76
74
73
Recognized net actuarial loss
664
506
235
Net periodic benefit cost/(income)
$
623
$
327
$
(205)
Unrecognized actuarial losses will continue to be amortized over a period of 14 years, which represents the term to retirement of the
youngest member of the Plan, until the benefits due to the participants under the Plan are formally transferred to the insurance
company.
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations follow:
December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023
Discount rate
4.27%
4.55%
The selection of a single discount rate for the defined benefit plan was derived from bond yield curves, which the Company believed
as of such dates to be appropriate for the plan, reflecting the length of the liabilities and the yields obtainable on investment grade
bonds. The assumption for a long-term rate of return on assets was based on a weighted average of rates of return on the investment
sectors in which the assets are invested.
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs follow:
2024
2023
2022
Discount rate
4.55%
4.90%
1.80%
Expected (long-term) return on plan assets
4.90%
6.37%
3.48%
Rate of future compensation increases
-
-
-
Expected benefit payments are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Pension benefits
2025
$
1,106
2026
1,080
2027
1,258
2028
1,050
2029
1,110
Years 2030-2034
5,985
$
11,589
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2024, by asset category are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 3 (1)
Cash and cash equivalents
$
105
$
105
$
—
Insured assets
$
18,574
$
—
$
18,574
Total
$
18,679
$
105
$
18,574
(1) The insured assets as of December 31, 2024 were measured using assumptions consistent with those used to measure the Plan
liability as of December 31, 2024.
113
International Seaways, Inc.
Multi-Employer Plans
The Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (“MNOPF”) is a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan covering British crew
members that served as officers on board INSW’s vessels (as well as vessels of other owners). The Trustees of the MNOPF have
indicated that, under the terms of the High Court ruling in 2005, which established the liability of past employers to fund the deficit on
the Post 1978 section of MNOPF, calls for further contributions may be required if additional actuarial deficits arise or if other
employers liable for contributions are not able to pay their share in the future. On July 11, 2024, the Company and the Trustees of the
MNOPF entered into an agreement pursuant to which the Company paid $0.1 million and the Trustees of the MNOPF agreed not to
seek any future contributions from the Company.
The Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund (“MNRPF”) is a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan covering British crew
members that served as ratings (seamen) on board INSW’s vessels (as well as vessels of other owners) more than 20 years ago. Based
on a High Court ruling in 2015, the Trustees of the MNRPF levied assessments to recover the significant deficit in the plan from
participating employers. Participating employers include current employers, historic employers that have made voluntary
contributions, and historic employers such as INSW that have made no deficit contributions. In September 2024, the Company entered
into an agreement with the Trustees of the MNRPF to release the Company from any future obligation to fund deficits in the plan in
exchange for the Company’s payment of $0.8 million.
The Company also made payments totaling $0.1 million to reimburse the Trustees of the MNOPF and MNRPF for costs incurred in
connection with the agreements entered into with the Company.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company has defined contribution plans covering all eligible shore-based employees in the U.K. and U.S. Contributions are
limited to amounts allowable for income tax purposes and include employer matching contributions to the plans. All contributions to
the plans are at the discretion of the Company or as mandated by statutory laws. The employer matching contributions to the plans
during each of the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
NOTE 17 — OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES:
The components of other operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Settlement of multi-employer pension plan obligations
$
1,019
Legal and consulting fees associated with settlement of pension plan obligations
1,801
Total other operating expenses
$
2,820
NOTE 18 — OTHER INCOME:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Investment income - interest
$
9,916
$
13,963
$
3,653
Net actuarial gain on defined benefit pension plan
233
510
647
Write-off of deferred financing costs
—
(2,686)
(1,266)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—
(1,323)
—
Other
(31)
188
(702)
$
10,118
$
10,652
$
2,332
Refer to Note 9, “Debt,” for additional information relating to the write-off of deferred financing costs and the loss on extinguishment
of debt.
114
International Seaways, Inc.
NOTE 19 — CONTINGENCIES:
INSW’s policy for recording legal costs related to contingencies is to expense such legal costs as incurred.
Spin-Off Related Agreements
On November 30, 2016, INSW was spun off from OSG as a separate publicly traded company. In connection with the spin-off,
INSW and OSG entered into several agreements, including a separation and distribution agreement, an employee matters agreement
and a transition services agreement. While most of the obligations under those agreements were subsequently fulfilled, certain
provisions (including in particular mutual indemnification provisions under the separation and distribution agreement and the
employee matters agreement) continue in force.
Legal Proceedings Arising in the Ordinary Course of Business
The Company is a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to various suits in the ordinary course of business for monetary relief arising
principally from personal injuries, wrongful death, collision or other casualty and to claims arising under charter parties and other
contract disputes. A substantial majority of such personal injury, wrongful death, collision or other casualty claims against the
Company are covered by insurance (subject to deductibles not material in amount). Each of the claims involves an amount which, in
the opinion of management, should not be material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In late July 2023, one of the Company’s vessels was arrested in connection with a commercial dispute arising earlier in the year.
Although the vessel was subsequently released, the arresting parties continue to seek approximately $25 million in security. The
underlying commercial dispute is in arbitration in England. The Company is defending itself vigorously against the allegations in the
underlying dispute. The Company is currently unable to predict the outcome of this matter, and no estimate of liability has been
accrued at this time.
115
International Seaways, Inc.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of International Seaways, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of International Seaways, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31,
2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial
statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013
framework), and our report dated February 27, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to
be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the
critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not,
by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or
disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment of Vessels
Description of the
Matter
As of December 31, 2024, the carrying value of the Company’s vessels (including deferred drydock
expenditures, net) was approximately $2.2 billion. As described in Notes 2 and 5 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company assesses whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that could
indicate that the carrying amounts of its vessels may not be recoverable. Upon identification of an indicator of
impairment, the Company evaluates the recoverability of a vessel by comparing its carrying amount to the
undiscounted future net cash flows it is expected to generate. If the Company determines that a vessel’s
carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the excess of the vessel’s
carrying amount over its estimated fair value determined using an income or market approach. Throughout
the year, the Company performed an evaluation of its vessels to determine if any such indicators of impairment
were present. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized an impairment charge of
approximately $8.7 million on a vessel to be sold to write down its carrying value to its estimated fair value.
116
International Seaways, Inc.
Auditing the Company’s impairment indicator assessment was complex due to the significant estimation
uncertainty and judgment required to evaluate the future market and economic conditions and forecasted
charter rates in a cyclical and volatile industry, as well as the degree of subjectivity involved in determining
indicative market values for a set of representative vessels in each of the Company’s vessel classes.
How We Addressed
the Matter in Our
Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the
Company's impairment indicator assessment process, including controls over management’s identification of
impairment indicators and management’s review of the significant assumptions described above. For example,
we tested management’s review of the methods used to forecast charter rates and the residual value of the
vessels as well as its review of the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of the key inputs used in developing
the estimates of fair value, including third-party appraisals.
To test the Company’s impairment indicator assessment process, including its identification of impairment
indicators, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used,
evaluating the significant assumptions described above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the key
inputs used by management in its analyses. For example, we compared the forecasted charter rates used by
management to current and past performance of the vessels, forecasted market rates and other relevant external
market and industry data. Further, we evaluated the third-party appraisal reports used by management to
support their assessment. We involved our internal valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the
methodologies and the significant assumptions applied in performing the impairment indicator assessment.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
New York, New York
February 27, 2025
117
International Seaways, Inc.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of International Seaways, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited International Seaways, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, International Seaways, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2024, and the related notes and our report dated February 27, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
February 27, 2025
118
International Seaways, Inc.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with
the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”),
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that
evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
December 31, 2024 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits
under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO
and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of adequate internal control over financial
reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act,
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s system of internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, with participation of the CEO and CFO, has performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the provisions of “Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Management has concluded
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 has been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.”
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
119
International Seaways, Inc.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Insider Trading Arrangements and Policies
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, none of our directors or executive officers adopted Rule 10b5-1 trading plans and
none of our directors or executive officers terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or adopted or terminated a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading
arrangement (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K).
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
See Item 14 below.
Executive Officers
The table below sets forth the name and age of each executive officer of the Company and the date such executive officer was elected
to his or her current position with the Company. The term of office of each executive officer continues until the first meeting of the
Board of Directors of the Company immediately following the next annual meeting of its stockholders, and until the election and
qualification of his or her successor. There is no family relationship between the executive officers.
Has Served
Name
Age
Position(s) Held
as Such Since
Lois K. Zabrocky
55 President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
November 2016 and May
2018
Jeffrey D. Pribor
67
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
November 2016
James D. Small III
56 Chief Administrative Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel
November 2016
Derek Solon
48 Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer
March 2021 and November
2016
William Nugent
56 Senior Vice President and Chief Technical and Sustainability
Officer
March 2021 and November
2016
Adewale O. Oshodi
45
Vice President and Controller
November 2016
Debra Grillo
57
Treasurer
January 2025
The business experience and certain other background information regarding our executive officers is set forth below.
Lois K. Zabrocky. Ms. Zabrocky has served as President and Chief Executive Office of the Company since November 30, 2016, when
the Company became an independent, publicly traded corporation, and has served as a Director of the Company since May 2018.
Under her leadership, the Company’s fleet has grown from 55 vessels (including six vessels held by joint ventures) to more than 75
vessels and the Company’s revenues have increased from approximately $400 million to approximately $1 billion. Prior to her
appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Ms. Zabrocky served in various roles during a career of 25
years at OSG, the Company’s former parent corporation. From August 2014 through November 2016, she was Co-President of OSG
and Head of International Flag Strategic Business Unit of OSG, from 2008 through August 2014 she was a Senior Vice President of
OSG and from May 2011 through August 2014, she was Chief Commercial Officer of the International Flag Strategic Business Unit
of OSG. She served as a director of the Company from November 2011 through November 2016 during which time the Company was
a wholly-owned subsidiary of OSG.
Jeffrey D. Pribor. From 2013 until his appointment to the role of Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company in
November 2016, Mr. Pribor was the Global Head of Maritime Investment Banking at Jefferies & Company, Inc. Mr. Pribor also was
Treasurer of the Company from November 2016 until January 2025. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of General Maritime Corporation, one of the world’s leading tanker shipping companies, from September 2004 to
February 2013. Prior to General Maritime Corporation, from 2002 to 2004, Mr. Pribor was Managing Director and President of DnB
NOR Markets, Inc. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Pribor was Managing Director and Group Head of Transportation Banking at ABN
120
International Seaways, Inc.
AMRO, Inc. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Pribor was Managing Director and Sector Head of Transportation and Logistics investment
banking for ING Barings.
James D. Small III. Mr. Small has served as Chief Administrative Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of
the Company since November 30, 2016. He served as Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of OSG from March
2015 until November 30, 2016. Prior to joining OSG in March 2015, Mr. Small worked for more than 18 years at Cleary Gottlieb
Steen & Hamilton LLP (“Cleary Gottlieb”), a law firm, the last seven years as counsel. At Cleary Gottlieb, Mr. Small’s practice
focused on corporate and financial transactions, U.S. securities law matters in U.S. and international capital markets transactions,
mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate transactions. As counsel at Cleary Gottlieb, Mr. Small provided legal services to OSG
between 2013 and February 2015.
Derek Solon. Mr. Solon has served as Senior Vice President of the Company since March 2021 and as Chief Commercial Officer of
the Company since November 30, 2016. He served as Vice President of the Company from November 2016 until March 2021. From
August 2014 through November 2016, Mr. Solon was Vice President, Commercial for OSG’s International Flag Strategic Business
Unit, and from 2012 to August 2014, he served as Vice President, Sale & Purchase. Before joining OSG, Mr. Solon was a Marine
Projects Broker at Poten & Partners in New York from 2003 to 2012. Prior to joining the commercial shipping industry, Mr. Solon
served as an officer in the United States Navy since 1998.
William Nugent. Mr. Nugent has served as Senior Vice President of the Company since March 2021 and as Head of Ship Operations
of the Company since November 30, 2016. On March 8, 2023, William Nugent’s title was changed to Senior Vice President and Chief
Technical and Sustainability Officer instead of Senior Vice President and Head of Ship Operations. He served as Vice President of the
Company from November 2016 until March 2021. From July 2014 until November 2016, Mr. Nugent served as Vice President and
Head of Ship Operations for OSG’s International Flag Strategic Business Unit. Prior to this, he was responsible for the Technical
Services Group, OSG’s global engineering team. He joined OSG in 2006 as Assistant Vice President for New Construction, was
promoted to head of the department in 2008 and oversaw the construction of ships, tugs and barges in China, Korea, and the United
States. Mr. Nugent previously worked for OSG from 2000 to 2002 overseeing construction of ships in Korea. In all, Mr. Nugent has
overseen construction of more than 50 vessels. Earlier in his career, Mr. Nugent was Director of Basic Design and Project Manager for
Alion Science and Technology and John J. McMullen Associates, Inc., respectively.
Adewale O. Oshodi. Mr. Oshodi has been a Vice President and the Controller of the Company since November 30, 2016. He served as
the Controller of OSG from July 2014 to November 30, 2016 and as Secretary of OSG from July 2014 until March 2015. He was
Director, Corporate Reporting from September 2010 when he joined OSG until July 2014. Mr. Oshodi began his career in the New
York commercial audit practice of Deloitte & Touche, LLP in 2000. As an Audit Manager between 2005 and 2008 and as an Audit
Senior Manager between 2008 and 2010, Mr. Oshodi worked primarily on audits of companies in the maritime industry.
Debra Grillo. Ms. Grillo has been Treasurer of the Company since January 2025. From October 2014 through November 30, 2016,
Ms. Grillo was the Assistant Treasurer of several subsidiaries of OSG and since December 1, 2016 has served as the Assistant
Treasurer of certain subsidiaries of the Company. Earlier in her career, Ms. Grillo served for approximately 14 years in various
positions of increasing responsibility in the Treasury department of Altria Group, Inc., serving as Senior Analyst, Assistant Manager,
Manager and Senior Manager.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is an integral part of the Company’s business conduct
compliance program and embodies the commitment of the Company and its subsidiaries to conduct operations in accordance with the
highest legal and ethical standards. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of the Company’s officers, directors and
employees. Each is responsible for understanding and complying with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Company also
has an Insider Trading Policy which prohibits the Company’s directors and employees from purchasing or selling securities of the
Company while in possession of material nonpublic information or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit. The
Insider Trading Policy also prohibits the Company’s directors and employees from hedging their ownership of securities of the
Company. In addition, the Company has an Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy which memorializes the Company’s commitment to
adhere faithfully to both the letter and spirit of all applicable anti-bribery legislation in the conduct of the Company’s business
activities worldwide. Further, the Company has an Inventive Compensation Recoupment Policy pursuant to which under specified
circumstances (i) executive officers of the Company are required to repay or return erroneously awarded compensation to the
Company in accordance with the Company’s claw back rules and (ii) the Board of Director of the Company may, in its good faith
discretion, require officers of the Company to repay all or a portion of their incentive compensation to the Company. The Code of
121
International Seaways, Inc.
Business Conduct and Ethics, the Insider Trading Policy, the Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy and the Incentive Compensation
Recoupment Policy are posted on the Company’s website, which is www.intlseas.com, and are available in print upon the request of
any stockholder of the Company. The Company intends to use its website as a method of disseminating this disclosure, as permitted
by applicable SEC rules. Any such disclosure will be posted to the Company website within four business days following the date of
any such amendment. The Company’s website and the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, are not
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have adopted an insider trading policy governing the purchase, sale and/or other transactions in securities by employees and
directors of the Company and certain other individuals that we believe is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider
trading laws, rules and regulations, and the exchange listing standards applicable to us. It is our policy to comply with all federal, state
and foreign securities laws and other applicable law (including by obtaining appropriate corporate approvals) when engaging in
transactions in our securities.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
See Item 14 below.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2024 with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans, which
have been approved by the Company’s shareholders. For a description of the material features of the Company’s equity compensation
plans and a description of shares withheld in connection with the vesting of previously-granted equity awards, see Note 12, “Capital
Stock and Stock Compensation,” to the consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
Number of
Securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
Plan Category
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
174,417
$
$19.93
480,101 *
*
Consists of 224,236 shares eligible to be granted under the Company’s 2020 Management Incentive Compensation Plan and
255,865 shares under the 2020 Non-Employee Director Incentive Compensation Plan.
See also Item 14 below.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
See Item 14 below.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Except for the table in Item 12 above, the information called for under Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated herein by reference
from the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed by the Company no later than 120 days after December 31, 2024, in connection with its
2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
122
International Seaways, Inc.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1)
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed in response to Item 8.
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
All Schedules of the Company have been omitted since they are not applicable or are not required.
(a)(3)
The following exhibits are included in response to Item 15(b):
The Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
2.1
Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of November 30, 2016 by and between Overseas Shipholding
Group, Inc. and Registrant (schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K;
the Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request) (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Amended and Restated By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of April 11, 2023 between the Registrant and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A., a federally chartered trust company, as Rights Agent, which includes the form of Rights Certificate as
Exhibit A and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Common Stock as Exhibit B (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 11, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2
Indenture, dated May 31, 2018, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (filed as Exhibit
4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 23, 2024 between the Registrant and Wayzata Opportunities Fund
III, L.P (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2023 and incorporated herein by reference).
**4.4
Description of International Seaways, Inc.’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
123
International Seaways, Inc.
*10.1
International Seaways, Inc. 2020 Non-Executive Director Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.1.1
Form of International Seaways, Inc. Non-Executive Director Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Grant
Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein
by reference).
*10.2
International Seaways, Inc. Management Incentive Compensation Plan (“MICP”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 25, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.2.1
Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Stock Option Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.1 to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.2.2
Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.2 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.2.3
Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (filed as
Exhibit 10.2.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.2.4
Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Alternate Stock Option Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.1 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.2.5
Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Alternate Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit
10.2.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated
herein by reference).
*10.2.6
Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Alternate Performance RSU Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.3 to
the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.3
International Seaways, Inc. 2020 Management Incentive Compensation Plan (“2020 MICP”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.3.1
Form of International Seaways, Inc. 2020 MICP Stock Option Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.3.2
Form of International Seaways, Inc. 2020 MICP Time-Based RSU Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.3.3
Form of International Seaways, Inc. 2020 MICP Performance-Based RSU Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Form of Employee Matters Agreement between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and the Registrant (filed as Exhibit
10.7 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 21, 2016 and
incorporated herein by reference).
*10.4.1
Form of Enhanced Severance Agreement (files as Exhibit 10.5.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.4.2
Form of Amended and Restated International Seaways, Inc. Retiree Health and Welfare Plan dated December 26, 2024
(filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2024 and incorporated
herein by reference).
124
International Seaways, Inc.
*10.4.3
First Amendment to International Seaways, Inc. Retiree Health and Welfare Plan dated December 31, 2024 (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2024 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.5
Employment Agreement dated September 29, 2014 between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and Lois K. Zabrocky
(filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.5.1
Amendment No. 1 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.5.2
Amendment No. 2 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement dated August 3, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to
Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on November 4, 2016 and incorporated
herein by reference).
*10.5.3
Form of Amendment No. 3 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2
to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.5.4
Amendment No. 4 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.5.5
Amendment No. 5 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.5.6
Amendment No. 6 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.5.7
Form of Amendment No. 7 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.5.8
Form of Amendment No. 8 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (field as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.5.9
Form of Amendment No. 9 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.6
Employment Agreement dated February 13, 2015 between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and James D. Small III
(filed as Exhibit 10.29 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and incorporated
herein by reference).
*10.6.1
Amendment No. 1 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.6.2
Amendment No. 2 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement dated August 3, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to
Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on November 4, 2016 and incorporated
herein by reference).
*10.6.3
Form of Amendment No. 3 to James D. Small III's Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment
No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by
reference).
125
International Seaways, Inc.
*10.6.4
Amendment No. 4 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.8 the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.6.5
Form of Amendment No. 5 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.6.6
Form of Amendment No. 6 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.6.7
Form of Amendment No. 7 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7
Employment Agreement dated September 29, 2014 between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and Adewale O.
Oshodi (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and
incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.1
Amendment No. 1 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to Overseas Shipholding
Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.2
Amendment No. 2 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.3
Amendment No. 3 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.4
Amendment No. 4 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.5
Form of Amendment no. 5 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.6
Form of Amendment No. 6 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.7
Form of Amendment No. 7 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.7.8
Form of Amendment No. 8 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.8
Employment Agreement dated November 9, 2016 between the Registrant and Jeffrey D. Pribor (filed as Exhibit 10.20
to Amendment No. 6 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on November 9, 2016 and
incorporated herein by reference).
*10.8.1
Amendment No. 1 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement dated November 9, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.8.2
Amendment No. 2 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.8.3
Form of Amendment no. 3 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).
126
International Seaways, Inc.
*10.8.4
Form of Amendment No. 4 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.8.5
Form of Amendment No 5. To Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.8.6
Form of Amendment No. 6 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.9
Letter Agreement dated as of February 19, 2024 by and between the Registrant and Nadim Z. Qureshi (filed as Exhibit
10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and incorporated herein
by reference).
*10.10
International Seaways Ship Management LLC Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and incorporated herein by
reference).
*10.11
First Amendment to the International Seaways Ship Management LLC Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (the
“Supplemental Executive Seaways Plan”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 3, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
*10.12
Second Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14
Distribution Agreement dated December 20, 2023 among the Registrant and Evercore Group L.L.C. and Jefferies LLC
(filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2023 and incorporated herein
by reference).
10.15
Credit Agreement dated as of May 20, 2022 (the “$750 Million Facility”) among the Registrant, International Seaways
Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time parties thereto, the lenders from time to time party
thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as administrative agent for the Lenders and as collateral agent and
security trustee for the Secured Parties and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as sustainability
coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15.1
First Amendment dated as of March 10, 2023 to the $750 Million Facility among the Registrant, International Seaways
Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time party thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as
administrative agent for the lenders and as, collateral agent and security trustee for the Secured Parties, and Credit
Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as sustainability coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 15, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference.)
10.15.2
Second Amendment dated as of April 26, 2024 to the $750 Million Facility among the Registrant, International
Seaways Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the Lenders from time to time
party thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as administrative agent for the lenders and as collateral agent and
security trustee for the Secured Parties, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as sustainability
coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
127
International Seaways, Inc.
10.15.3
Joinder Agreement dated May 23, 2024 by each of Jennings Tanker Corporation, Lafayette Tanker Corporation,
Harrison Tanker Corporation, EB Tanker Corporation, and Crystal Tanker Corporation to the $750 Million Facility (as
amended by the First Amendment dated as of March 10, 2023, the Second Amendment dated as of April 26, 2024, and
as further amended and/or restated, henceforth the “$500 Million Revolving Credit Facility”) among the Registrant,
International Seaways Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the Lenders from
time to time party thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as administrative agent for the lenders and as
collateral agent and security trustee for the Secured Parties, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as
sustainability coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15.4
Joinder Agreement dated June 7, 2024 by Albans Tanker Corporation to the $500 Million Revolving Credit Facility
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024 and
incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
$160 Million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2023, among the Registrant, International
Seaways Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time parties thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York
Branch, as administrative agent, Collateral Agent, Coordinator and security trustee for the Secured Parties, and ING
Bank, London Branch, as sustainability coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 and incorporated by reference herein).
**19
International Seaways, Inc. Insider Trading Policy.
**21
List of significant subsidiaries of the Registrant.
**23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
**31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as amended.
**31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as amended.
**32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1
Irrevocable Conditional Letter of Resignation of Kristian K. Johansen dated April 17, 2024 (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
99.2
Consulting Agreement dated November 27, 2024 between Douglas Wheat and the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated November 25, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference).
*97
International Seaways, Inc. Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy dated as of November 27, 2023 (filed as
Exhibit 97 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and incorporated
herein by reference).
EX-101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document.
EX-101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Schema.
EX-101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
EX-101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
EX-101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
EX-101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
128
International Seaways, Inc.
EX-104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
(1) The Exhibits marked with one asterisk (*) are a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed
as an exhibit.
(2) The Exhibits which have not previously been filed or listed are marked with two asterisks (**).
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None
129
International Seaways, Inc.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 27, 2025
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
By:
/s/ Jeffrey D. Pribor
Jeffrey D. Pribor
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Each of such persons appoints Lois K. Zabrocky and Jeffrey
D. Pribor, and each of them, as his agents and attorneys-in-fact, in his name, place and stead in all capacities, to sign and file with the
SEC any amendments to this report and any exhibits and other documents in connection therewith, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that such attorneys-in-fact or either of them may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney.
Name
Date
/s/ LOIS K. ZABROCKY
February 27, 2025
Lois K. Zabrocky, Principal
Executive Officer; Director
/s/ JEFFREY D. PRIBOR
February 27, 2025
Jeffrey D. Pribor, Principal
Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
/s/ IAN T. BLACKLEY
February 27, 2025
Ian T. Blackley, Director
/s/ DARRON M. ANDERSON
February 27, 2025
Darron M. Anderson, Director
/s/ TIMOTHY BERNLOHR
February 27, 2025
Timothy Bernlohr, Director
/s/ A. KATE BLANKENSHIP
February 27, 2025
A. Kate Blankenship, Director
/s/ RANDEE DAY
February 27, 2025
Randee Day, Director
/s/ DAVID I. GREENBERG
February 27, 2025
David I. Greenberg, Director
/s/ KRISTIAN K. JOHANSEN
February 27, 2025
Kristian K. Johansen, Director
/s/ CRAIG H. STEVENSON JR.
February 27, 2025
Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Director
Exhibit 4.4
DESCRIPTION OF INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.’S SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
The following summary of the material terms of our common stock and common stock purchase rights does not
purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation (our “Articles of Incorporation”), our Amended and Restated By-Laws (our “By-
Laws”), the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of April 11, 2023 (the “A&R Rights
Agreement”) and the Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 23, 2024 (the “2024 Registration
Rights Agreement”), each of which is an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this description is
an exhibit. At December 31, 2024, International Seaways, Inc. (the “Company”) had two outstanding classes of
securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”):
common stock, no par value per share (the “Common Stock”) and rights to purchase common stock (the
“Rights”). We encourage you to read our Articles of Incorporation, our By-Laws, the A&R Rights Agreement
and the 2024 Registration Rights Agreement and the applicable provisions of the Republic of Marshall Islands
Business Corporations Act (the “BCA”) for additional information.
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and 10,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, no par value. All of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable.
Holders of our Common Stock have no preemptive rights, conversion rights or other subscription rights as set
out in our Articles of Incorporation, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our
Common Stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Common Stock are subject to, and may be
impacted by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue
in the future.
Exchange
Our Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “INSW.”
Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. is the registrar and transfer agent for our Common Stock.
Voting Rights
The holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the stockholders,
including the election of directors. Our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. Except as otherwise
provided by law, our Articles of Incorporation or our By-Laws, matters will generally be decided by a majority
of the votes cast once quorum is met.
Dividend Rights
The holders of our Common Stock are entitled to such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare from
time to time from legally available funds, based on the number of shares of Common Stock then held of record
by such holder, subject to the preferential rights of the holders of any shares of preferred stock that we may
issue in the future.
Rights upon Liquidation
Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, the holders of our
Common Stock are entitled to share, on a pro rata basis, all assets remaining after payment to claimants and
creditors and subject to prior distribution rights of any shares of preferred stock that we may issue in the future.
Certain Anti-Takeover Effects
Our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws contain a number of provisions relating to corporate governance and
to the rights of stockholders. Certain of these provisions may be deemed to have a potential “anti-takeover”
effect in that such provisions may delay, defer or prevent a change of control or an unsolicited acquisition
proposal that a stockholder might consider favorable, including a proposal that might result in the payment of a
premium over the market price for the shares held by the stockholders. Examples of such provisions in our
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws relating to corporate governance and the rights of stockholders, certain
of which may be deemed to have a potential “anti-takeover” effect, include:
Authorized but Unissued or Undesignated Capital Stock. Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000
authorized shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. A large quantity of authorized
but unissued shares may deter potential takeover attempts because of the ability of our Board of Directors (the
“Board”) to authorize the issuance of some or all of these shares to a friendly party, or to the public, which
would make it more difficult for a potential acquirer to obtain control of us. This possibility may encourage
persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with our Board. The authorized but unissued stock
may be issued by the Board in one or more transactions. In this regard, our Articles of Incorporation grants the
Board broad power to establish the rights and preferences of authorized and unissued preferred stock. Although
our Articles of Incorporation prohibits the Board, without the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the total
voting power of our outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote on such matters, voting as a class, from
issuing any preferred stock for any defensive or anti-takeover purpose, for the purpose of implementing any
shareholder rights plan or with features specifically intended to make any attempted acquisition of the Company
more difficult or costly, the issuance of shares of preferred stock pursuant to the Board’s authority described
above could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of Common Stock
and adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of such holders and may have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control. The Board does not currently intend to seek stockholder
approval prior to any issuance of preferred stock, unless otherwise required by law or our Articles of
Incorporation.
Action by Written Consent. Our By-Laws and Section 67 of the BCA provide that stockholder action can be
taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting if all stockholders entitled to vote on the subject matter
unanimously consent.
Special Meetings of Stockholders. Our By-Laws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called
only by the President or any Vice President, by resolution of the Board or by holders of not less than 25% of all
outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter for which the meeting is called. Our By-Laws prohibit the
conduct of any business at a special meeting other than as specified in the notice for such meeting.
Advance Notice Procedures. Our By-Laws establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder
proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the
direction of the Board. In order for any matter to be “properly brought” before a meeting, a stockholder will
have to comply with advance notice requirements and provide us with certain information. Generally, to be
timely, a stockholder’s notice must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more
than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting. In the event
that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days earlier or more than 60 days later than such anniversary
date, notice by the stockholder must be received no earlier than 90 days prior to the annual meeting and not later
than the later of 60 days prior to the annual meeting or 10 days following the public announcement of the date
of the annual meeting. Our By-Laws also specify requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s
notice. These provisions may defer, delay or discourage a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of
proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to influence or obtain control of us.
Super Majority Approval Requirements. Our By-Laws provide that our Board, at any regular meeting or special
meeting called for the purpose, and our stockholders, at any annual meeting or special meeting called for the
purpose, may make, alter, amend or repeal our By-Laws. However, our Board may not, without the affirmative
vote of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote on such matters, alter, amend or repeal certain
provisions of our By-Laws, including those relating to stockholder meeting quorum requirements, majority
election of directors, notification of the nominations for the election of directors, special meetings of our Board,
committees of the Board and amendments to the By-Laws. Further, our Board may not, without the affirmative
vote of the holders of two-thirds or more of the outstanding stock entitled to vote on such matters, alter, amend
or repeal certain other provisions of our By-Laws, including those relating to the calling of special meetings by
stockholders and stockholder action by written consent.
The BCA provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares then entitled to
vote is required to amend a corporation’s articles of incorporation, unless the articles of incorporation requires a
greater percentage. Our Articles of Incorporation provides that specified provisions, including those relating to
amendment of our Articles of Incorporation and the procedures by which any action required or permitted to be
taken by holders of Common Stock may be performed, may only be amended or repealed by the affirmative
vote of two-thirds of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of our capital stock.
The combination of these provisions may make it more difficult for our existing stockholders to replace our
Board as well as for another party to obtain control of us by replacing our Board. Because our Board has the
power to retain or discharge our officers, these provisions could also make it more difficult for existing
stockholders or another party to effect a change in management.
Rights to Purchase Common Stock
On May 8, 2022, we entered into a shareholder rights plan in the form of a Rights Agreement (the “Rights
Agreement”), dated as of May 8, 2022, between the us and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights
agent. The Rights Agreement was approved by the Board. In connection with the Rights Agreement, the Board
authorized and declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of Common Stock. The
dividend was payable on May 19, 2022 to stockholders of record at the close of business on such date. While
the Rights Agreement was effective immediately, the Rights would become exercisable only if a person or
group acquired beneficial ownership, as defined in the Rights Agreement, of 17.5% or more of the Common
Stock in a transaction not approved by the Board. In that situation, each holder of a Right (other than the
acquiring person or group) would have the right to purchase, upon payment of the then-current exercise price, a
number of shares of Common Stock having a market value of twice the exercise price of the Right. In addition,
at any time after a person or group acquired 17.5% or more of the Common Stock (unless such person or group
acquires 50% or more), the Board could exchange one share of the Common Stock for each outstanding Right
(other than Rights owned by such person or group, which would have become null and void). The expiry date of
the Rights Agreement was May 7, 2023.
On April 11, 2023, the Board approved the A&R Rights Agreement, which amends and restates the Rights
Agreement dated as of May 8, 2022. The A&R Rights Agreement implements substantially the same features
and protective measures of the Rights Agreements and includes the following revised or additional provisions:
(i)
extends the expiration date from May 7, 2023 to April 10, 2026;
(ii)
increases the “Acquiring Person” trigger threshold from 17.5% to 20%;
(iii)
increases the “Purchase Price” from $25 to $50; and
(iv)
includes a qualifying offer provision with a shareholder redemption feature.
The Board adopted the Rights Agreement and the A&R Rights Agreement to enable all stockholders of the
Company to realize the full potential value of their investment in the Company. The A&R Rights Agreement is
designed to prevent any individual stockholder or group of stockholders from gaining control of the Company
through open market accumulation without paying a control premium to all stockholders or by otherwise
disadvantaging other stockholders. The A&R Rights Agreement is not intended to prevent a takeover or deter
fair offers for securities of the Company that deliver value to all stockholders on an equal basis. It is designed,
instead, to encourage anyone seeking to acquire the Company to negotiate with the Board prior to attempting a
takeover.
The Board may consider an earlier termination of the A&R Rights Agreement if market and other conditions
warrant.
The 2024 Registration Rights Agreement
On February 23, 2024, the Company entered into the 2024 Registration Rights Agreement with Wayzata
Opportunities Fund III, L.P (together with its successors and permitted assigns, the “2024 Registration Rights
Holders”). The 2024 Registration Rights Holders and any person or entity who hereafter becomes a party to the
2024 Registration Rights Agreement will be entitled to registration rights pursuant to the terms of the 2024
Registration Rights Agreement.
The foregoing description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
2024 Registration Rights Agreement.
Pursuant to the 2024 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a shelf registration statement
registering the resale of the 2024 Registration Rights Holders’ shares on Form S-3ASR (File No. 333-278975)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2024.
Exhibit 19
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
INSIDER TRADING POLICY
1. NEED FOR A POLICY
Federal and state securities laws prohibit each employee, officer and director of International Seaways, Inc. (the
“Company” or “INSW”), and certain other people with whom they have relationships, from purchasing or selling
securities of the Company while such person is aware of “material nonpublic information”, or from disclosing material
nonpublic information to others. The Company has adopted this Insider Trading Policy to satisfy the Company's
obligation to prevent insider trading and to help Company personnel avoid the severe consequences associated with
violations of the insider trading laws and this Insider Trading Policy. The Insider Trading Policy is also intended to
prevent even the appearance of improper conduct on the part of anyone employed by or associated with the Company
(not just so-called “insiders”). As used in this Insider Trading Policy, the term “Company” refers to International
Seaways, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries.
1.1 The Consequences
The consequences of an insider trading violation can be severe and may impact others beyond Company employees:
1.1.1 Traders and Tippers.
Company personnel, and any persons to whom those persons convey material nonpublic information ("tippees"), who
trade on inside information are subject to the following penalties:
• A civil penalty of up to three (3) times the profit gained or loss avoided;
• A criminal fine of up to $5,000,000 (no matter how small the profit); and
• A jail term of up to twenty (20) years.
An employee who tips information to a person who then trades is subject to the same penalties as the tippee, even if the
employee did not trade and did not profit from the tippee's trading.
1.1.2 Company-Imposed Sanctions.
An employee's failure to comply with the Company's Insider Trading Policy may subject the employee to Company-
imposed sanctions, including dismissal for cause, whether or not the employee's failure to comply results in a violation of
law. A violation of law, or even a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation that does not result in
prosecution, can tarnish one's reputation and irreparably damage a career.
2. STATEMENT OF POLICY
It is the Company’s policy that no director, officer or other employee of the Company who is aware of material nonpublic
information relating to the Company may, directly or through family members or other persons or entities, (a) buy or sell
securities of the Company (other than pursuant to a pre-approved trading plan that complies with SEC Rule 10b5-1), or
engage in any other action to take personal advantage of that information, or (b) intentionally or otherwise pass that
information on to others outside the Company. In addition, it is the Company’s policy that no director, officer or other
employee of the Company who, in the course of working for the Company, learns of material nonpublic information
about another company with which the Company does business, including a customer of the Company, may trade in that
other company's securities until the information becomes public or is no longer material. Any of these transactions are
“prohibited transactions”. Transactions that may be necessary or justifiable for independent reasons (such as the need to
raise money for any emergency expenditure) are not excepted from the policy. The securities laws do not recognize such
mitigating circumstances, and, in any event, even the appearance of an improper transaction must be avoided to preserve
the Company's reputation for adhering to the highest standards of conduct. If you have any questions regarding a
particular situation you may be facing, you should contact the Company’s General Counsel at the number set out below.
2.1 Disclosure of Information to Others.
The Company is required under Regulation FD of the U.S. federal securities laws to avoid the selective disclosure of
material nonpublic information. The Company has established procedures to release material information in a manner
that is designed to achieve broad public dissemination of the information immediately upon its release. You must not,
therefore, disclose material nonpublic information to anyone outside the Company, including family members and
friends, without the prior consent of the Chief Executive Officer or an Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President
of the Company. Similarly, you should never discuss the Company or its business in an internet "chat room" or similar
internet-based forum.
2.2 Material Information.
Material information is any information that a reasonable investor would consider important in making a decision to buy,
hold, or sell securities. Any information that could be expected to affect the Company's stock price, whether it is positive
or negative, should be considered “material”. Some examples of information that ordinarily would be regarded as
“material” include (without limitation) the following:
Projections of future earnings or losses, or other earnings guidance;
Information about earnings that is inconsistent with the consensus expectations of the investment community or
previously published earnings guidance;
A pending or proposed acquisition or disposition of a significant asset;
A change in management;
Unusual gains or losses in the Company’s business operations;
Proposals, plans, negotiations and agreements regarding significant acquisitions, divestitures, business
combinations, joint ventures or similar transactions;
The award or loss of major contracts, and developments regarding significant customers;
New equity or debt offerings or other financing transactions;
Developments regarding litigation or government agency investigations, whether actual or threatened;
Changes in Company’s credit rating; or
Information that will be included in forthcoming Company, industry or research publications that may affect
market price of Company’s securities.
2.3 Twenty-Twenty Hindsight.
Remember, anyone scrutinizing your transactions will be doing so after the fact, with the benefit of hindsight. As a
practical matter, before engaging in any transaction, you should carefully consider how enforcement authorities and
others might view the transaction in hindsight and when necessary or advisable, contact others for assistance or guidance
before making a decision which might be prohibited under this Insider Trading Policy. (See Sections 3 and 4)
2.4 When Information is "Public".
If you are aware of material nonpublic information, you may not trade until the information has been made “public” by the
Company by being disclosed broadly to the marketplace (such as by press release or an SEC filing) and the investing
public has had time to absorb the information fully. To avoid the appearance of impropriety, as a general rule,
information should not be considered “public” or fully absorbed by the marketplace until after the second full business day
after the information is released. If, for example, the Company were to make an announcement on a Monday, you should
not trade in the Company's securities until Thursday. If an announcement were made on a Friday, the following
Wednesday generally would be the first eligible trading day. Note that if any announcement is made at least one hour
prior to market open, that trading day will be considered to be one of the two full business days referenced above. If you
are unsure whether information has been made “public,” you must seek guidance in advance of trading.
2.5 Transactions by Family Members.
The Insider Trading Policy also applies to any of your family members that reside with you, anyone else who lives in
your household, and any family members who do not live in your household but whose transactions in Company’s
securities are subject to your influence or control (such as parents or children who consult with you before they trade in
the Company’s or other securities). You are legally responsible for any transactions made by these other persons, and
therefore should make them aware of the need to confer with you before they trade in the Company’s or other affected
securities.
2.6 Transactions Under Company Plans
2.6.1 Stock Option Exercises.
The Company's Insider Trading Policy generally does not apply to the exercise of an employee stock option by an
employee. The policy does apply, however, to any sale of stock as part of a broker-assisted cashless exercise of an
option, or any other market sale for the purpose of generating the cash needed to pay the exercise price of an option.
2.6.2 401(k) Plan.
The Company’s 401(k) plan does not currently include an option to purchase Company stock. Were that to change,
the Company's Insider Trading Policy typically would not apply to purchases of Company stock in the 401(k) plan
resulting from a predetermined periodic contributions of money to the plan pursuant to your payroll deduction election.
The Insider Trading Policy does, however, apply to certain decisions you may make under the 401(k) plan (including
with respect to Company stock you may already own), including (a) an election to make an intra-plan transfer of an
existing account balance into or out of the Company stock fund, (c) an election to borrow money against your 401(k)
plan account if the loan will result in a liquidation of some or all of your Company stock fund balance, and (c) an election
to pre-pay a plan loan if the pre-payment will result in allocation of loan proceeds to the Company stock fund.
2.6.3 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
The Company does not currently offer an Employee Stock Purchase Plan to purchase Company stock. If that were to
change, the Company's Insider Trading Policy typically would not apply to purchases of Company stock in an employee
stock purchase plan resulting from your predetermined periodic contributions of money to the plan pursuant to the
election you made at the time of your enrollment in the plan. The Policy will be updated if the Company reinstates an
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
2.7 Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging.
Many hedging or monetization strategies with respect to a security involve the establishment of a short position in the
security. The Company considers the establishment of a short position in the Company’s securities, such as through a
short sale, as evidence of an expectation on the part of the seller that the securities will decline in value, and therefore a
signal to the market that the seller has no confidence in the Company or its short-term prospects. In addition, short sales
may reduce the seller's incentive to improve the Company's performance. For these reasons, directors, officers and
employees of the Company are prohibited from hedging their ownership of Company securities, including investing in
options, puts, calls, short sales, futures contracts or other derivative instruments relating to Company securities,
regardless of whether such directors and employees have material nonpublic information about the Company. In
addition, directors, officers and employees are prohibited from purchasing Company securities on margin, borrowing
against Company securities held in a margin account, or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan or other
obligation.
2.8 Post-Employment Transactions.
The Insider Trading Policy continues to apply to prohibited transactions even after an employee’s employment has ended,
with respect to material nonpublic information. If you are in possession of material nonpublic information when your
employment ends, you may not trade in Company securities until that information has become public or is no longer
material. In addition, certain “insiders” may be subject to additional restrictions on trading in the Company’s securities
for a period of time after their employment ends even if they do not have material nonpublic information about the
Company.
2.9 Insiders.
The following persons are considered, collectively, to be “Insiders”:
all of the members of the Board of Directors,
all executive officers of the Company, and
certain other employees of the Company who have been separately notified that these provisions apply to
them, including in particular non-executive employees who regularly become aware of earnings information
or other material nonpublic information about the Company.
When significant events occur, and on an annual basis, the list of employees designated as insiders will be reviewed and
individuals will be added or removed from coverage as necessary. You will be notified if there is any change in your
status. Whether any entity affiliated with an “insider” should also be considered an “insider” is a question that should be
discussed with the General Counsel.
Insiders are subject to certain additional restrictions on trading beyond those applicable to other employees. Those
procedures, which are detailed in a separate communication that will be distributed to Insiders, require (1) pre-clearance
of trades and (2) compliance with certain periodic and event-specific blackout periods. In summary:
i.
All Trades by Insiders Must Be Pre-Cleared. Insiders may not trade in any Company securities, except after
first consulting and pre-clearing each such transaction with the Company’s General Counsel (or, if
unavailable, the Chief Executive Officer). The General Counsel will review and either approve or prohibit
proposed trades by Insiders. If a transaction is approved under the pre-clearance policy, it must be executed
within the period specified by the General Counsel, but regardless may not be executed if the Insider has or
acquires material non-public information concerning the Company before the trade takes place. If the
transaction is not completed within the approved period, the transaction must be approved again before it may
be executed. If any proposed transaction is not approved, the Insider must refrain from initiating any
transaction in the Company’s securities and shall not inform anyone within or outside the Company of the
restriction.
ii.
Blackout Period Compliance. Insiders may not trade any Company securities during the period commencing
on the 15th day of the month in which Company’s quarter ends and ending at the close of the second full
trading day after the broad public release of the Company’s financial results with respect to the preceding
fiscal quarter. In addition, from time to time, the Company may impose event-specific blackout periods
during which Insiders are prohibited from trading. If the Company imposes an event-specific blackout
period, it will not be announced, but if an Insider provides notice of a proposed trade during the blackout
period, he or she will be advised of the existing of a blackout period, without disclosing the reason for the
blackout. The Insider shall not inform anyone within or outside the Company of the existence of an event-
specific blackout period.
Any person who has been or believes he or she may have been designated as an Insider should contact the General
Counsel if they have not received the separate memorandum detailing restrictions applicable to Insiders.
3. EXCEPTION REQUESTS OR OTHER COMPANY ASSISTANCE
Any person who requests an exception to, or has a question about, this Insider Trading Policy or its application or any
proposed transaction should obtain additional guidance from the Company’s General Counsel, whose telephone number is
(212) 251-1199. Any such guidance should be obtained prior to the execution of any trade to which the Insider
Trading Policy may apply. Ultimately, however, the responsibility for adhering to this Insider Trading Policy and
avoiding prohibited or unlawful transactions rests with the individual.
4. RAISING QUESTIONS OR REPORTING CONCERNS
If you have any other questions or are concerned about something that seems to be in conflict with the law, regulations,
the Company Code of Business Conduct, or this Insider Trading Policy, you have several options:
Inform your manager. Be as specific and detailed as possible so they understand the situation and your concerns;
Contact the General Counsel or another member of the Legal Department; or
Contact the INSW Employee Hotline toll-free anytime at 1 (855) 874-9549.
All questions or concerns will be handled in as confidential manner as appropriate and will be investigated without
retaliation.
5. OTHER POLICIES WHICH MAY APPLY
The Insider Trading Policy should be considered along with other Company policies that may apply to trading in
Company securities, including in particular the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Certain policies are
available on the Company’s website at www.intlseas.com under the “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance” tab, and
all of the Company’s policies are available on the Company’s intranet site, my.intlseas.com.
6. CERTIFICATIONS
Employees, officers and directors must certify their understanding of, and intent to comply with, this Insider Trading
Policy. A copy of the certification that all employees, officers and directors must sign is attached to this memorandum.
This certification can also be made by an e-mail containing the same language as arranged by the Company’s IT
Department.
CERTIFICATIONS
I certify that:
1. I have read and understand the Company's Insider Trading Policy, including the statement of policy
regarding securities trades by Company personnel. I understand that the General Counsel is available to
answer any questions I have regarding the Insider Trading Policy.
2. Since November 30, 2016 (or such later date as I became an Employee, Officer or Director), I have complied
with the Insider Trading Policy.
3. I will continue to comply with the Insider Trading Policy for as long as I am subject to the policy.
Signature: ________________________________
Print name: ________________________________
Date: , 202__
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
The following table lists, as of December 31, 2024, all subsidiaries of International Seaways, Inc. and all companies in which the
registrant directly or indirectly owns at least a 49% interest, except for certain companies and subsidiaries which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single entity, would not constitute a significant entity. All of the entities named below are corporations, unless
otherwise noted.
Company
Where Incorporated,
Organized or Domiciled
Africa Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Albans Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Alpha Seaways MR Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Amalia Product Corporation
Marshall Islands
Apollonas Shipping Company
Marshall Islands
Asterias Crude Carrier S.A.
Marshall Islands
Athens Product Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Batangas Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Belerion Maritime Co.
Marshall Islands
Beta Seaways MR Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Cape Seaways Ltd.
Marshall Islands
Carl Product Corporation
Marshall Islands
CPT Alliance Ltd.
Marshall Islands
Crystal Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
CVI Citron, LLC
Delaware (1)
Delta Aframax Corporation
Marshall Islands
Delta Seaways MR Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Diamond S Management LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Diamond S Shipping II LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Diamond S Shipping III LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Diamond S Shipping Inc.
Marshall Islands
Diamond Tanker Company LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS 1 LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS 2 LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS 5 LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS 6 LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS 7 LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS 8 LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS A LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS B LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS C LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS D LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS Suez JV LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS Vessel II, LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS Vessel III LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS Vessel IV LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
DSS Vessel LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Eagle Product Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
EB Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Epicurus Shipping Company
Marshall Islands
Epsilon Aframax Corporation
Marshall Islands
Filonikis Product Carrier S.A.
Liberia
First Pacific Corporation
Marshall Islands
Front President Inc.
Marshall Islands
Front Tobago Shipping Corporation
Marshall Islands
Guayaquil Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Harrison Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Hatteras Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Hendricks Tanker Company LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Henry Tanker Company LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Company
Where Incorporated,
Organized or Domiciled
Heroic Andromeda Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Auriga Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Avenir Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Equuleus Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Gaea Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Hera Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Hercules Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Hologium Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Hydra Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Libra Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Octans Inc.
Marshall Islands
Heroic Pegasus Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Perseus Inc.
Marshall Islands
Heroic Pisces Inc.
Marshall Islands
Heroic Sagittarius Inc.
Marshall Islands
Heroic Scorpio Inc.
Marshall Islands
Heroic Scutum Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Serena Inc.
Liberia
Heroic Tucana Inc.
Marshall Islands
Heroic Virgo Inc.
Liberia
Iason Product Carrier S.A.
Liberia
International Seaways Operating Corporation
Marshall Islands
International Seaways Ship Management LLC
Delaware (1)
Iraklitos Shipping Company
Marshall Islands
Isiodos Product Carrier S.A.
Liberia
Jennings Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Kythnos Chartering Corporation
Marshall Islands
Lafayette Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Leyte Product Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Liberty Tanker Company LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Lightering LLC
Liberia (2)
Lorenzo Shipmanagement Inc.
Marshall Islands
Maple Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Milos Product Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Mindanao Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Montauk Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Navarro International S.A.
Marshall Islands
NT Suez One LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Oak Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
OIN Chartering, Inc.
Marshall Islands
OSG Clean Products International, Inc.
Marshall Islands
Overseas Shipping (GR) Ltd.
Marshall Islands
Panamax International Ltd.
Marshall Islands
Rose Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Samar Product Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Alpha LR Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Alternative Energy Holding Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Beta LR Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Delta LR Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Epsilon LR Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways First AE Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Gamma LR Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Holding Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways LR Holding Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Second AE Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Shipping Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Shipping II Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Shipping III Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Subsidiary VII Inc.
Marshall Islands
Company
Where Incorporated,
Organized or Domiciled
Seaways Third AE Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Seaways Zeta LR Corporation
Marshall Islands
Second Katsura Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Skopelos Product Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
Sorrel Shipmanagement Inc.
Marshall Islands
Titanas Product Carrier S.A.
Liberia
Triton Tanker Company LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Tybee Tanker Company LLC
Marshall Islands (3)
Urban Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
View Tanker Corporation
Marshall Islands
White Boxwood Shipping S.A.
Liberia
White Hydrangea Shipping S.A.
Marshall Islands
Wind Dancer Shipping Inc.
Marshall Islands
(1) This entity is a Delaware limited liability company.
(2) This entity is a Liberian limited liability company.
(3) This entity is a Marshall Islands limited liability company.
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-278975) of International Seaways, Inc.,
(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-215174) of International Seaways Inc.,
(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-238476) of International Seaways Inc.,
(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-258464) of International Seaways Inc.,
(5) Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-269002) of International Seaways, Inc.,
of our reports dated February 27, 2025, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of International Seaways, Inc. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of International Seaways, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
International Seaways, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2024.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
February 27, 2025
EXHIBIT 31.1
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED
I, Lois K. Zabrocky, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of International Seaways, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and we have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2025
/s/ Lois K. Zabrocky
Lois K. Zabrocky
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED
I, Jeffrey D. Pribor, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of International Seaways, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and we have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2025
/s/ Jeffrey D. Pribor
Jeffrey D. Pribor
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of International Seaways, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certifies, to the best of her/his knowledge and belief, that the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2024 (the “Periodic Report”) accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided
solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any
other purpose.
3
/s/ Lois K. Zabrocky
Date: February 27, 2025
Lois K. Zabrocky
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 27, 2025
/s/ Jeffrey D. Pribor
Jeffrey D. Pribor
Chief Financial Officer