Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Asset Management / IP Group Plc

IP Group Plc

ipo · LSE Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker ipo
Exchange LSE
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · IP Group Plc
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
IP GROUP PLC
ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS FOR 
THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
REGISTRATION NUMBER: 04204490 
STOCK CODE: IPO

CONTENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Highlights	
01
At a glance	
03
STRATEGIC REPORT
Chair’s statement	
05
Business model	
07
Market overview	
08
CEO review	
10
Strategic progress	
14
Managing Partner’s	
17 
portfolio review	
CFOO review	
21
Key performance indicators	
26
Meaningful impact	
28
Task Force on Climate-related 	
32 
Financial Disclosures	
Risk management	
38
Working with the Group’s 	
50 
stakeholders	
GOVERNANCE
Governance at a glance	
59
Board of Directors	
61
Corporate governance framework	 64
Corporate governance statement	 65
Nomination Committee report	
72
Directors’ Remuneration report	
78
Audit and Risk Committee report	
101
Directors’ report	
106
Statement of Directors’ 	
108 
responsibilities	
OUR FINANCIALS
Independent auditor’s report	
109
Consolidated statement of 	
117 
comprehensive income	
Consolidated statement of 	
118 
financial position	
	
Notes to the consolidated 	
121 
financial statements	
Company balance sheet	
160
Notes to the Company 	
162 
financial statements	
Company information	
IBC
At IP Group, we understand science. 
We understand its impact today and its potential to 
shape the future.
With more than 20 years’ experience evolving great 
ideas into world-changing businesses, we also 
understand that progress takes patience. That is 
why we choose partners with purpose, who, like us, 
are committed to impacting the world’s greatest 
unmet needs.
Together, we accelerate the impact of science to 
transform ideas into impact, at scale. We see a 
future transformed by human ingenuity. And we 
look to make it happen by spotting the opportunities 
others miss.
We are one of the most active investors in university 
and other research-based companies in the world, 
with a proven track record in backing and nurturing 
science and technology-based businesses to deliver 
impact and returns. Since the Group was founded, 
IP Group and Parkwalk Advisors have backed over 
500 companies whose compelling ideas, products 
and services will meaningfully contribute to a 
healthier, tech-enriched and regenerative future.
We aim to accelerate the impact of science for a 
better future.
BUSINESS 
MODEL.
  Read more 
on page 07
MARKET 
ENVIRONMENT.
  Read more 
on page 08
PORTFOLIO 
REVIEW.
  Read more 
on page 17
GOVERNANCE.
  Read more 
on page 59
IDEAS 
POWERED.
OUR FINANCIALS
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Net Asset Value (“NAV”)
£952.5m 
2023: £1,190.3m 
NAV pence per share1
97.7pps
2023: 114.8pps
% change in NAV  
per share
(15%)
2023: (14%)
Loss for the year 
(£207.0m)
2023: (£174.4m) 
Total portfolio1 
£837.4m
2023: £1,164.9m 
Gross cash and 
deposits1
£285.6m 
2023: £226.9m 
Cash proceeds1
£183.4m 
2023: £38.6m 
Portfolio investment1
£63.0m 
2023: £73.2m 
1	
Note 27 details the Alternative Performance Measures (“APM”)

Outperformed on exits
despite reduction in NAV per share
Accelerated share 
buyback programme
since January 2024, up to £80m  
buybacks announced
Significant portfolio 
and pipeline 
opportunity
Total cash proceeds 
from exits of £183.4m, 
+375% 
Largest ever exit: sale of 
Featurespace Ltd to Visa 
£784m of capital raised 
across portfolio 
Four companies 
reported positive clinical 
trial data
OUR FINANCIALS
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
01
HIGHLIGHTS.
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Outperformed on exits, despite 
reduction in NAV per share:
•	
Total cash proceeds from exits of £183.4m (+ 375%) 
including: 
•	
£134m: Sale of Featurespace Ltd to Visa (£119m 
cash received in the year) – largest ever exit
•	
£30m: Sale of Garrison Technology Ltd to Everfox
•	
£9.2m: Sale of Kynos Therapeutics Ltd to Dr Falk 
Pharma GmbH 
•	
up to £15m: Secondary sale of minority 
holdings in six portfolio companies at small 
premium to NAV
•	
Strong balance sheet and liquidity with gross cash of 
£285.6m, up 26% from £226.9m in 2023
•	
NAV/share down 15% to 97.7p with closing NAV of 
£952.5m, driven by decrease in market value of 
Oxford Nanopore (ONT) and valuation reductions for 
First Light Fusion and Istesso in challenging market 
conditions
•	
Raised further £95m of third-party funds  
(Hostplus and Parkwalk) – third-party AUM now 
£678m, up from £650m in 2023
•	
Total net overheads run rate reduced by 23% by year 
end, a 12% reduction for the year
Accelerated buybacks:
•	
Since January 2024, announced buybacks of 
up to £80m representing 19% of current market 
capitalisation
•	
Completed £30m of share buyback programme 
during year, with £50m balance ongoing
•	
10% of share capital retired to date, increased 
shareholder authority now sought in order to 
complete ongoing programme
Significant portfolio  
and pipeline opportunity:
•	
£784m of capital raised (up 17%) with £63m invested 
across 38 companies, reflecting maintained 
discipline
•	
Istesso: Phase 2b study of leramistat in rheumatoid 
arthritis demonstrated novel mechanism of action 
and effectiveness in bone repair in secondary 
endpoints despite not meeting primary endpoint
•	
Enterprise Therapeutics and Genomics: 
Significant investment rounds closed, to fund next 
development stage
•	
Four companies (Storm, Mission, Kynos and Abliva): 
reported positive clinical trial data
•	
Hysata: Completed oversubscribed $111m Series 
B funding round, the largest Series B in Australian 
cleantech history
•	
First Light Fusion: Sets pressure record at Sandia 
National Laboratories and refocuses business model 
on revenues
•	
Strong interest in companies developing faster, more 
efficient computing hardware for AI including Instrisic 
and Lumai
Post period-end update: 
•	
Intention to extend buyback programme by a further 
£10m, announced today
•	
Intention to allocate 50% of 2025 exits to buyback 
programme, announced today
•	
Cash and deposits of £277m as at 21 March following 
additional cash proceeds of £24.7m since 31 Dec
•	
Fair value of Group’s holdings in listed companies 
decreased by £14.7m in the period since 31 Dec, 
including £13.8m from ONT
•	
Hinge Health files for a New York initial public offering
•	
Istesso notifies shareholders of outcome of Phase 2b 
trial which completed in 2024
The Group prioritised profitable exits 
during 2024, outperforming a relative 
lack of liquidity across the venture capital 
market, despite our negative NAV per 
share performance. These exits included 
our largest ever cash realisation with the 
sale of Featurespace to Visa, alongside 
a number of other holdings, at or above 
carrying values. The £183m of cash 
proceeds strengthened our liquidity position 
and enabled us to significantly increase 
our share buyback programme while 
continuing to invest for growth. 
We have already completed a number of 
exits in the current year with a promising 
pipeline of further realisations, giving us 
confidence in delivering more than £250m of 
exits from private company holdings by the 
end of 2027. We also noted Hinge Health’s 
recent announcement that it intends to list 
on the New York Stock Exchange. Given our 
share price continues to reflect a significant 
discount to NAV per share, during 2025 we 
intend to increase the proportion of exits 
allocated to buybacks to 50%.
As the UK’s most active investor in university 
spin-outs, IP Group has an exciting and 
compelling portfolio of companies which is 
attracting strong interest from third parties. 
While the current macro environment 
remains challenging, the Board has ensured 
the Group is appropriately sized and 
well financed and continues to focus on 
delivering returns for shareholders.”
Greg Smith
CEO
02	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
2024 HIGHLIGHTS.
PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
OUR FINANCIALS
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

PROPORTION OF CAPITAL
INVESTEE COMPANY STAGE
Pre-Seed/Seed & Series A
Series B & C+
Dedicated Enterprise 
Investment Scheme (EIS) 
funds with world-class 
universities
Science & tech 
scale-up capital
Permanent balance 
sheet capital
Private funds 
managed by IP Group
IP Group's EIS business
  INTEGRITY.
  PURPOSE.
  GROWTH.
Committed to doing 
the right thing, in 
the right way.
Bold and focused 
in the pursuit of 
our mission.
Driven by finding 
a better way to 
do things.
Do the right thing, at the 
right time and the right 
way, even when no one 
is looking.
Dedicated to 
accelerating the power 
of science for a better 
future, and to delivering 
market-leading returns. 
Always looking for new 
and innovative ways to 
do things better.
Set high standards for 
yourself and others. 
Trust your colleagues to 
make the right decisions 
and to deliver. Genuine 
care for all of the 
stakeholders impacted 
by your work.
Perseverance, 
collaboration and 
commitment. Success 
will not often come 
quickly, and cannot be 
achieved alone.
Relentlessly curious, 
open-minded and keen 
to learn. We’re always 
looking for a better way 
to do things or a new 
solution to a difficult 
problem.
Our key differentiators
Purposeful thematic focus 
Our purpose focuses us on impact. We are 
focused on backing and supporting businesses in 
our three investment themes where we can add 
value through our expertise and experience. 
Access to unique opportunities 
We are a global group with a strong network 
and relationships with world-leading 
academic research institutions, giving us 
differentiated access to an exciting portfolio of 
high-growth companies. 
Expert teams 
We aim to be a home for exceptional and highly 
motivated talent. Our investment teams are 
experts in their fields with a deep understanding 
of science and technology, as well as decades 
of experience in identifying, nurturing and exiting 
unique high-growth businesses. 
Imagination and flair 
We are entrepreneurs at heart, bringing 
imagination and flair to supporting our 
portfolio companies through all stages of 
their development.
International profile
Our international footprint gives us access to a 
range of opportunities and provides valuable 
insight and resource to support our portfolio 
companies as they scale and grow in the UK, US, 
Australia and New Zealand.
Permanent capital structure 
Investing from our balance sheet is a significant 
advantage, enabling us to be flexible and patient. 
This allows us to co-found and build companies, 
and realise value at the most appropriate time. 
Track record 
We have a track record built over more 
than 20 years of turning great ideas into 
world-changing businesses and creating value. 
HEALTHIER FUTURE
Life Sciences
  Read about Life Sciences 
on pages 09 and 17
TECH-ENRICHED FUTURE
Deeptech
  Read about Deeptech  
on pages 09 and 17
REGENERATIVE FUTURE
Cleantech
  Read about Cleantech 
on pages 09 and 17
Culture and values
Three thematic focus areas
UK’s most active and largest investor in UK university spin-outs
OUR FINANCIALS
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
03
AT A GLANCE.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS

Top ten investments by Fair Value
Oxford Nanopore
Technologies plc
£106.6m
Istesso Limited
£91.9m
Hysata Pty Ltd
£76.8m
Oxa 
Autonomy 
Limited
£42.7m
First Light
Fusion Limited
£25.0m
Nexeon 
Limited
£19.4m
Hinge Health, Inc.
£36.6m
Pulmocide 
Limited
£23.1m
Artios 
Pharma 
Limited
£17.4m
Mission 
Therapeutics
£22.5m
KEY
  Life Sciences
  Cleantech
Priority companies
We place meaningful focus on a dynamic list of companies which we believe 
can be material in the context of overall Group performance and underpin our 
self-sustaining model. These include:
Oxford Nanopore Technologies: The world’s first nanopore DNA sequencing 
platform, which is uniquely scalable from pocket-sized formats through to 
ultra-high throughput devices, enabling the genetic analysis of any living 
thing, by any person, in any environment. The technology offers real-time data 
analysis for rapid, dynamic insights and played a key role in the COVID-19 
pandemic. 
Istesso: Immunometabolism drug discovery and development aimed at 
reprogramming metabolism to treat autoimmune disease. 
Hysata: Hysata’s unique capillary fed electrolyser technology promises an 
efficiency gain in the production of green hydrogen.
Oxa: Global leader in autonomous vehicle software based on artificial 
intelligence engineering, machine learning and modular software design.
Hinge Health: The world’s first digital clinic for back and joint pain with an 
expanding customer base.
First Light Fusion: Inertial confinement approach to fusion, aiming to create the 
extreme temperatures and pressures required for fusion by compressing fuel 
using a hypervelocity projectile. Fusion power is safe, clean and limitless with the 
potential to transform the world’s energy system. Achieved validated world-first 
fusion event in 2022 and set pressure record at Sandia National Laboratory 
in 2024.
Pulmocide: Treatment of respiratory diseases through a novel approach to 
inhaled medicines. Phase 3 study of its novel anti-fungal for invasive pulmonary 
aspergillus underway.
04	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
AT A GLANCE.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

As we entered 2024, we recognised that appetite for higher 
risk and early-stage assets was likely to remain cautious, 
given the number and significance of the elections that were 
to take place during the year as well as the disruptions to 
historic trade and investment flows that were evident from 
the major geopolitical tensions and military conflicts that had 
escalated. We adjusted our investment plans accordingly, 
concentrating capital allocation in our highest potential 
portfolio companies, in particular those with good prospects 
to deliver a cash return in the near to medium term.
Recognising the stubbornness of the gap between 
our reported Net Asset Value (‘NAV’) per share 
and our share price, the Board set management 
a number of priorities in 2024 to address this 
disparity. These included prioritising realisations to 
demonstrate value creation from our investment 
activity; pursuing third party co-investment 
transactions to validate our valuation discipline; 
attracting third party funds to add capacity to our 
investing activity; seeking fresh investors to the plc 
and improving operational gearing through better 
cost performance.
This low appetite for (public market) investments in 
early-stage assets was reflected in delayed funding 
rounds, and where funding rounds did take place, we 
witnessed a decline in valuation. As a consequence, 
we reported a loss for the year of £207m driven 
by a £52m decline in the value of our stakes in 
listed companies (primarily Oxford Nanopore) and 
valuation adjustments and write-offs in the private 
portfolio of £228m. It is worth noting that in the latter 
case, the 3 largest write-downs reflected a £94m 
reversal of previous uplifts. In terms of cash flow, we 
increased our cash and deposits by £59m in 2024 
after investing £63m in the portfolio and applying 
£30m to the repurchase of our own shares.
In order to achieve this outcome, we had some 
significant successes. We delivered the highest value 
cash realisation in our history from the sale of our 
stake in Featurespace, generating disposal proceeds 
of £134m of which £119m was received in cash before 
the end of the year. Total proceeds of £183.4m were 
five times that achieved in 2023. Gross cash at 
31st December stood at £285.6m against our market 
capitalisation at that date of £525.7m.
We structured and executed a partial secondary 
sale of shareholdings in six of our portfolio 
companies realising up to £15m in cash, at an 
aggregate value modestly ahead of our book 
carrying value thereby evidencing the integrity 
of our valuation processes. We also secured a 
further A$125m co-investment commitment from 
Hostplus, our principal partner through our Australian 
business. And we completed a restructuring and 
reorganisation of our business that will reduce 
ongoing costs within the business by £5m, or some 
23%. Greg discusses these events in more detail in 
his report.
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
The Board is confident that there is 
substantial unrecognised value within 
the portfolio. Our principal objective in 
the coming year is to harness what we 
believe is a strong desire amongst UK 
institutions to support this segment of 
the UK growth story and configure our 
business in whatever way is needed to 
be successful.”
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
05
CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

There were inevitably a number of disappointments. Our 
largest portfolio investment, Oxford Nanopore fluctuated 
in value significantly during the year losing over half its 
value in the first half and although recovering a decent 
portion of this in the second half, was still down by 38% 
over the year. Management, with the Board’s strong 
endorsement, and given our position as one of its largest 
shareholders, has spent considerable time supporting 
Oxford Nanopore on ways to address this volatility and 
drive a recovery in its value for all their shareholders.
Although widely anticipated, we were frustrated that 
Istesso (our second largest portfolio holding), was 
not in a position to release any data from its phase2b 
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) study with its drug leramistat 
during 2024. However, on 11th February this year Istesso 
did provide an update which was both disappointing, 
yet at the same time, encouraging. The trial results 
reinforced leramistat’s novel mechanism of action 
and its effectiveness in bone protection in people 
living with RA. Significant improvements were seen in 
the key secondary endpoint of bone erosions as well 
as improvements in disability and fatigue in patients 
treated with leramistat, despite it not meeting the 
primary endpoint of improvement in ACR20 versus 
placebo. We are nevertheless pleased to report that 
Istesso is sufficiently funded to conduct the additional 
studies which the Phase2b results justified. This study will 
undertake further evaluation of leramistat’s potential 
to promote tissue repair in RA, as well as other chronic 
conditions. Greg discusses this in more detail in 
his review.
We spent considerable time in 2024 seeking to attract 
private capital for a scale up fund to build on the 
commitments that many pension funds and others 
have made pursuant to the Mansion House compact 
and other government sponsored initiatives to support 
growing innovative UK businesses; while this was not 
finalised in 2024 we are optimistic that the work done 
and discussions in train will lead to the creation of such 
a fund in 2025.
Public capital markets in 2024 were not helpful to 
IP Group, nor indeed to most of our peer group, as 
investor appetite for small cap companies was muted 
– indeed many funds dedicated to this sector wound 
down during the year. We applaud the efforts of the 
London Stock Exchange to attempt to revitalise this 
sector as we believe it is vital to the growth economy the 
government seeks to establish. It is incredibly dispiriting 
that in spite of the ambition of the Mansion House 
reforms launched in the previous parliament and the 
priority commitment given to the growth agenda by the 
current government, that there is little evidence of such 
change in UK investment markets for our sector.
We enter 2025 with key funding rounds underway 
for a number of our significant portfolio companies. 
Encouragingly, after prolonged gestation periods, there 
is evidence that investors are prepared to commit, 
albeit at discounts to previous rounds in many cases, 
a factor which has been reflected in our year-end 
valuations. Again, it is worth noting that much of this 
renewed interest originates from outside the UK. These 
funding rounds and any potential IPOs are encouraging 
early indications that confidence may be returning to 
our sector.
Notwithstanding the significant success in realisations 
in 2024, our share price ended the year substantially 
where it started the year (53.9p versus 58.1p) with the 
discount to NAV remaining elevated at 45%. Adjusting for 
net cash and listed stakes, the discount to the remaining 
portfolio value was some 81%. We understand and share 
shareholder frustration and disappointment with this 
position, which we recognise has deteriorated further 
since the year end following the release of Istesso’s 
trial results. While reducing this gap will largely come 
from success in our investment activities, thereby 
demonstrating the value within the portfolio, we can 
and have taken steps to address the discount by buying 
back shares. During 2024 we completed a buyback 
programme of £30m and we currently intend to 
supplement this by adding a further £50m.
Outlook
As we enter 2025, the need remains for scientific 
innovation to address many of society’s urgent 
challenges, from ageing populations to climate change, 
to harnessing the power, while controlling the misuse of 
AI and understanding what the unprecedented power 
of quantum computing will offer. The government in 
the UK embraces the ambition to place UK science 
and technological excellence at the heart of its growth 
agenda, yet public markets remain slow to support this 
ambition in terms of providing the long-term venture 
and scale-up capital needed.
The Board is confident that there is substantial 
unrecognised value within the portfolio. Our principal 
objective in the coming year is to harness what we 
believe is a strong desire amongst UK institutions 
to support this segment of the UK growth story and 
configure our business in whatever way is needed 
to be successful. If we are mistaken in our belief that 
there is support in UK public markets for contributing 
to the financing of great ideas founded in UK scientific 
discovery through to world changing businesses, we 
shall look again, with our advisers, at the other options 
already considered by the Board, to optimise value for 
shareholders over the medium term. I look forward to 
updating you on progress as the year develops.
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
24 March 2025
06	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

1	
INPUTS
2	
INVESTMENT LIFECYCLE –  
BACKING COMPANIES FROM START-UP TO SCALE-UP
3	
EXIT, REINVESTMENT & 
RETURN TO SHAREHOLDERS
4	
OUTCOMES WITH IMPACT 
INTELLECTUAL.
We work with some 
of the world’s best 
scientists, universities 
and entrepreneurs in 
our chosen territories 
and thematic 
focus areas.
FINANCIAL.
We combine our 
balance sheet 
capital with third-
party capital 
to accelerate 
the progress 
of promising 
companies.
HUMAN.
We aim to attract 
the best talent to the 
Group and to our 
portfolio businesses.
Investing from our balance 
sheet enables us to be 
patient and hold investments 
until they mature before 
realising value at the most 
appropriate time.
We reinvest realised funds 
into new opportunities and 
into the growth of our priority 
companies.
We also make appropriate 
returns to shareholders.
  Read about our business 
model in action  
on page 13
Addressing the world’s 
greatest unmet 
challenges:
•	
Genetic sequencing in 
any environment
•	
Treatment of 
autoimmune, respiratory 
and other serious 
diseases
•	
Preventing fraud and 
financial crime
•	
Cyber security
•	
Autonomous vehicle 
software
•	
Clean energy
Economic growth  
and innovation
•	
500+ companies 
created
•	
27 new portfolio 
investments in 2024
•	
Deep pipeline of future 
potential winners
Financial returns
•	
£655m cash realised 
from the portfolio over 
five years
•	
£105m returned to 
shareholders via 
dividends and share 
buybacks over five years
START-UP.
Identification of promising research 
and creation of investable 
businesses. Capital deployed to 
progress ideas to early commercial 
and technical validation.
SCALE-UP.
Proactive sourcing of co-investment 
and continued nurture and 
development of businesses to grow 
value over time.
PRIORITY COMPANIES.
Heaviest resources and capital focused on a dynamic list of the best risk/
reward opportunities and companies with potential to scale at >£1bn within 
three to five years.
PROPORTION OF CAPITAL
INVESTEE COMPANY STAGE
Pre-Seed/Seed & Series A funding
Series B & C+ funding
Permanent balance 
sheet capital
Dedicated Enterprise 
Investment Scheme (EIS) 
funds with world-class 
universities
Science & tech 
scale-up capital
Private funds 
managed by IP Group
IP Group's EIS business
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
07
BUSINESS MODEL.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Macroeconomic environment
The global economic landscape in 2024 has been 
shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including 
inflation dynamics, interest rate adjustments, and 
geopolitical developments including elections in 
many of the world’s largest democracies. The Bank of 
England’s monetary policy, which saw the base rate 
peak at 5.25% in 2023, has been pivotal in influencing 
market conditions. As inflationary pressures began to 
ease, the focus shifted towards the anticipated timing 
and scale of interest rate cuts through the second half 
of 2024 and into 2025.
Public market performance
In 2024, UK public market performance was mixed, with 
the FTSE250 index gaining 5% in the year, but the FTSE 
All-share index down 6%. Market commentary in the 
UK continues to highlight a sustained period of capital 
outflows from UK equities, particularly at the small cap 
end of the market, and a reduction in the number of 
UK listed companies as a result of acquisitions and 
companies switching their primary listing venue out of 
the UK. 
Against this weak backdrop in the UK, global equity 
markets experienced robust performance, driven by 
solid economic growth, falling inflation, and Federal 
Reserve interest-rate cuts. The NASDAQ composite 
index gained 29%, with technology and communication 
services stocks leading the gains, fuelled by the ongoing 
artificial intelligence boom. Despite some volatility, the 
overall market sentiment remained positive, marking 
another positive year for risk assets within the US, albeit 
early 2025 has seen NASDAQ fall back into correction 
territory. 
In terms of Initial Public Offering activity, 2024 saw an 
overall rebound in IPO proceeds raised, with US proceeds 
up 47% year-on-year. Life sciences IPO activity however 
remained essentially flat against 2022 and 2023 activity 
levels. Market commentary points to 2025 being the year 
that IPO activity could see a broader-based recovery in 
activity, albeit uncertainty around the impact of tariffs 
and defence may have a dampening impact.
Private venture capital (VC) 
market trends
The private VC market saw another year of relatively 
muted activity following on from 2023, with overall global 
activity flat at $369bn, and global deal volumes down 
by 17%1, and with AI deals making up over one third of 
all market volumes in the period. The same trend was 
in evidence in the UK, with private fundraising down 19% 
year-on-year by value, with the final quarter of the year 
seeing the lowest number of deals since 20142.
Our portfolio companies demonstrated resilience in 
terms of fundraising performance, with a 17% increase in 
total capital raised, driven by strong fundraising activity 
within our Life Sciences portfolio and outperforming the 
broader market. 
Late-stage VC valuations in Europe saw a modest 
10% year-on-year increase, reflecting a cautious 
improvement in sentiment during the year3.
1	
Pitchbook data
2	 Beahurst data
3	 Pitchbook European VC valuations report
Exit and fundraise activity
Exit activity in the VC market continued to be subdued, 
with US VC exit values of $149bn broadly unchanged 
from 2022 and 2023, and around half the level seen in 
20194. Global fundraising figures by VC venture funds hit 
a six-year low, with total funds raised of $104.7bn down 
18% on 2023 figures5.
Strategic positioning and 
future outlook
We remain optimistic about the long-term prospects of 
VC investment in the US and UK. Thematic megatrends 
continue to support the growth of disruptive, science-
based companies. IP Group is strategically aligned 
with the UK Government’s growth initiatives and is well 
positioned to benefit from reforms in the UK pensions 
market, which aim to increase the allocation of pension 
capital to high-growth private companies.
4	 Pitchbook US venture survey
5	 Venture Capital Journal
We remain optimistic about the long-term prospects of 
VC investment in the US and UK. Thematic megatrends 
continue to support the growth of disruptive,  
science-based companies.”
Greg Smith
CEO
08	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
MARKET OVERVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Megatrends in our thematic business sectors
Healthier  
future
Curing and preventing 
diseases to enable 
healthier lives
Tech-enriched 
future
Transformational 
change in the 
digital world
Regenerative 
future
Civilisation-risk trajectory 
of climate heating, driving 
rapid decarbonisation
•	
Understanding risk from patient to 
population level
•	
Reprogramming cells to change their 
behaviour from diseased to healthy modes
•	
Reconditioning tissues to improve response 
to existing therapies
•	
Redirecting patient behaviour to reduce risk
Megatrends
•	
Drug “patent cliff”: more than $200bn annual 
revenue at risk from expiry of patents on 
existing drugs, increasing emphasis on new 
drug discovery
•	
Government intervention into drug pricing 
favours newly-approved therapies
•	
Emergence of digital healthcare and 
personalised medicine
•	
Explosion of DNA sequencing as costs fall 
dramatically
Addressable markets
•	
DNA sequencing market $100bn by 2034
•	
RA market $37bn by 2030
•	
Digital healthcare market value $836bn 
by 2031
•	
Billions of connected devices requiring real-
time and remote processing
•	
Data growth outstripping economic growth 
by multiple factors
•	
Growth of the metaverse
•	
Energy-hungry data centres
•	
New technologies and powerful computing 
multiplying cyberthreats
Megatrends
•	
Applied AI to solve problems in underserved 
application areas including cyber security
•	
Next generation ultra-reliable networks to 
deliver mission-critical new applications
•	
Hardware and software that evolve and 
enhance human interaction with machines
•	
Future computing systems for complex 
problem-solving, including analogue, 
neuromathic and quantum computing
Addressable markets
•	
Generative AI market $1tn market by 2034
•	
Global chip market $1.07tn by 2030 
•	
Global autonomous vehicle market size of 
over $100bn in 2030
•	
Civilisation-risk trajectory of climate heating 
driving rapid decarbonisation and climate-
resistant economies
•	
2024 warmest year on record; over 1.5°C 
above pre-industrial levels
•	
4x increase in investment in clean energy 
technology and infrastructure from today’s 
levels by 2035
•	
Continued UK Government commitment to 
climate transition including new infrastructure
Megatrends
•	
Energy transformation: electrification and 
low/no carbon fuels
•	
Energy reduction
•	
Water reduction
Addressable markets
•	
Green hydrogen $135bn market by 2032, $1.4tn 
by 2050
•	
Liquid fuels $1.5trn market with low 
penetration of low-carbon fuels
•	
Global battery market size over $0.5tn by 2032
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
09
MARKET OVERVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Overview
While the operating environment continued to remain 
challenging in 2024, the Group prioritised generating 
profitable cash realisations and made excellent 
progress in this regard. This performance meant the 
Group finished the year with a strong liquidity position, 
having recorded total cash proceeds of £183.4m, nearly 
five times the level achieved in 2023, with gross cash 
and deposits of £286m at year-end up from £227m. 
This enabled the Group to increase its buyback, as 
well as reinvesting for future growth. Having delivered 
a further £25m in realisations to date during 2025, the 
Group is today increasing its buyback programme by a 
further £10m, to a total of up to £80m. 
The continued weaker market environment for 
early-stage investing did, however, weigh on private 
company valuations and quoted portfolio company 
share prices, which impacted our NAV per share, down 
15% to 97.7pps at the end of the year (2023: 114.8pps). 
Accordingly, the Group took decisive action to adjust 
our delivery strategy, which enabled us to reduce 
our operating costs and ensure the Group remains 
appropriately sized and well positioned. Further 
information is set out in the financial review. 
IP Group, including through its market-leading Parkwalk 
brand, is the UK’s leading science and technology 
investor, having formed more than 500 science-based 
businesses. By starting and growing businesses driving 
improved health outcomes, the energy transition and 
the digital transformation, the Group aims to have 
a significant impact on some of society’s biggest 
needs and deliver compelling financial returns for 
our shareholders.
Combining university relationships with deep sector 
experience and networks provides highly differentiated 
dealflow and the Directors believe the Group has a 
compelling portfolio, evidenced by strong commercial 
progress in many of our companies. In addition, the 
Directors are encouraged by the signs of improvement 
in the private technology sector following increased 
interest and M&A activity in the portfolio.
The Directors believe the Group, one of the largest and 
most experienced investors in university IP in the world, 
is well placed to benefit from a recovery in the market 
environment, given its strong liquidity position, reduced 
cost base and promising portfolio, with many of our 
portfolio companies having the potential for billion-
dollar exit valuations. 
Delivery against strategic priorities
As noted in the Chairman’s Summary, against a 
challenging backdrop, the Group made good progress 
on achieving many of our main strategic priorities in 
2024 which comprised delivering cash exits, accessing 
further capital for the portfolio and our managed funds 
and accelerating our share buyback programme.
The challenging environment impacted valuations 
and share prices in the period, resulting in a negative 
return on NAV of 17% or £207.0m (2023: negative return 
of 13%, £172.2m). This was driven by substantial write-
downs in a number of our portfolio companies, the 
largest of which was a £66m fall in the value of our 
holding in Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc, followed 
by a £40m reduction in the value of our holding in First 
Light Fusion and a £33.8m reduction in the value of 
our holding in Istesso Ltd to reflect the outcome of its 
Phase 2b study of leramistat in rheumatoid arthritis 
(RA). Although the study did not meet the primary 
endpoint of improvements in ACR20 versus placebo, 
leramistat did demonstrate statistically significant 
reductions in the key secondary endpoint of bone 
erosions, as well as improvements in disability and 
fatigue. The performance of the Group’s business 
units is summarised below with further detail in the 
portfolio review.
All £m unless stated
Invested
Cash 
proceeds
Net 
portfolio 
gain/(loss)
Fair value at 
31 December 
2024
Simple 
return on 
capital (%)
Healthier future: Life Sciences (ex ONT)
35.3
28.8
(52.2)
348.5
(14%)
Healthier future: ONT
1.0
1.6
(66.3)
106.6
(38%)
Tech-enriched future: Deeptech
8.5
148.9
10.5
89.4
4%
Regenerative future: Cleantech (Kiko Ventures)
15.7
0.0
(75.1)
215.9
(27%)
Platform investments
2.5
4.1
(11.9)
77.0
(13%)
Total portfolio
63.0
183.4
(195.0)
837.4
(17%)
Greg Smith
CEO
The Directors continue to believe the 
Group has a compelling portfolio, 
evidenced by strong commercial 
progress in many portfolio companies. 
While the current macro environment 
remains challenging, the Group is 
appropriately sized, well financed, 
and continues to believe it is well 
positioned for an improved appetite 
for high growth investments while 
remaining focused on delivering returns 
for shareholders.”
10	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CEO REVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Our strategy of ‘increased focus’ meant that over 55% of our portfolio value is 
concentrated in 10 companies, and 83% in 40 companies, across the three main 
thematic areas where the Group has deep expertise and experience. The Group 
invested in 38 opportunities in 2024 comprising 18 in Life Sciences, 9 in Deeptech and 8 
in Cleantech. 95% of our capital was invested into the existing portfolio, with 5% being 
invested into new opportunities.
Our portfolio also continues to be well-funded with over 82% by value of the portfolio 
currently funded into 2026 or beyond. In 2024, our portfolio companies successfully 
raised a total of £784m of which IP Group contributed £63.0m (2023: £667m, £73.2m). 
Notable transactions announced in 2024 included the oversubscribed US$111m 
fundraise by Hysata, the largest Series B in Australian cleantech history (which was 
reflected in our 2023 year end valuation), the £35m raise by Genomics to accelerate 
the adoption of polygenetic risk scores, the £26m raise by Enterprise Therapeutics to 
fund its P2a clinical proof of concept trial in cystic fibrosis and the £25m Series D raise 
by Mission Therapeutics to progress its clinical candidates in the area of mitophagy.
Cash exits
IP Group performed strongly on cash realisations, generating £183.4m (2023: £38.6m), 
the majority of which came from the sale of portfolio company Featurespace Ltd to 
Visa, generating £134m of cash for the Group, a return of 5.9x on the £22.9m invested. 
The Group received an initial £119m cash in December 2024 with the balance of £15m 
expected in 2025 and 2026. This transaction, which was executed at a 70% premium 
to our holding value at the start of the year, represents IP Group’s largest ever exit. 
Having been the first institutional investor in Featurespace, IP Group invested a total of 
£22.9m over seven financing rounds, supporting the company’s growth into a leader in 
enterprise technology for fraud and financial crime prevention.
Another key exit in the period also came from our Deeptech sector with the sale of 
Garrison Technology Ltd, a pioneer in hardware-based cybersecurity solutions, to 
Everfox, a global leader in high-assurance cybersecurity, which completed in August, 
delivering £30m of cash. Garrison develops innovative “hardsec” technology that protects 
users from cyber threats such as ransomware and phishing by creating an electronic 
barrier between the internet and devices. IP Group supported Garrison’s growth from 
startup to trusted provider for ultra-secure government clients, including the UK and US 
governments, and commercial organisations like Lloyds Banking Group and Vodafone.
Both of these transactions further validate IP Group’s model and our expertise in 
identifying and supporting science and technology businesses to successful exits.
In Life Sciences, the Group sold Kynos Therapeutics Ltd to Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, 
generating £9.2m of cash at a 2.4x multiple, while two quoted companies received 
cash offers. Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc, in which the Group has a 20.8% holding, 
received a cash offer from Surgical Science Sweden AB which valued the business 
at approximately £45.2m. As a result, IP Group received £8.8m of cash for its holding 
in 2025, which represented an uplift of £4.4m (100%) from the last-reported NAV at 
30 June 2024. 
Abliva AB, which discovers and develops medicines for the treatment of mitochondrial 
disease and in which the Group has a 9.5% stake, received a cash offer from Pharming 
Technologies BV which valued that business at approximately SEK725.3m. Following 
the completion of the sale in February 2025, IP Group received £5.1m total cash, 
representing a multiple of 1.6 times cost and an uplift in carrying value of £3.8m (292%) 
since the last-reported NAV at 30 June 2024.
The Group also announced in December that it had agreed the sale of minority 
holdings in nine portfolio companies across its balance sheet and managed funds to 
a new fund managed by Lexham Partners for up to approximately £15m of cash from 
the 6 balance sheet holdings included in the transaction. These sales are expected to 
be at a small overall premium to the 2023 balance sheet value.
All of these transactions have been at or above current carrying levels, validating the 
balanced valuation approach which underpins our reported NAV.
Accessing further capital under management
IP Group continued to focus on increasing its funds under management and we are 
pleased to report that the Group raised £95m of third party managed funds in 2024 
and now manages or advises £678m (2023: £650m). Approximately three-quarters 
of that figure, or £481m, is managed by Parkwalk, the Group’s specialist EIS fund 
management subsidiary (2023: £469m), including funds managed in conjunction with 
the universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Bristol, and Imperial College London.
Parkwalk invested £47.2m in 2024 (2023: £45.1m) in the university spin-out sector 
across 38 companies (2023: 27 companies). Again, a report from market data provider 
Beauhurst shows that IP Group and Parkwalk are by far the UK’s leading investor in 
the sector. Twenty-two new companies joined the Parkwalk portfolio, one positive exit 
closed and a further one was announced, and two escrow releases from previous exits 
were distributed to underlying investors. Fourteen portfolio companies closed funding 
rounds at uplifts in valuation, five unchanged and ten at lower valuations than the 
previously held value. These companies raised c.£140m in funding this year.
Through Parkwalk, we liaised closely with UK Government including HMRC on the financial 
ecosystem for knowledge-intensive spin-out companies and across political parties to 
ensure science and innovation is at the heart of the UK Government’s growth mission.
Most of our remaining funds are managed by our Australian team and we are also 
pleased to report that Hostplus, a top ten Australian Superannuation fund, allocated 
a further A$125m to the IP Group Hostplus Innovation Fund in the period, bringing the 
total committed to A$435m. This fund has invested in several of the Group’s portfolio 
companies including Oxford Nanopore, Genomics, First Light Fusion, Oxa and Hysata, 
providing additive growth capital for companies as they scale. TelstraSuper is also 
investing alongside IP Group through a co-investment mandate.
The Group continues to focus on increasing funds under management and believes 
there is scope to further increase private capital under management this year.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
11
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
CEO REVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Accelerated buybacks
Delivering returns for shareholders remains paramount including focusing on 
narrowing the discount to our NAV per share, which the Directors continue to believe 
significantly undervalues the potential within the Group’s portfolio. We are therefore 
announcing today that we intend to allocate 50% of the Group’s 2025 exits to our 
ongoing buyback programme and a further extension of this programme by £10m.
The Group aims to deliver returns to shareholders primarily in the form of long-term 
capital appreciation. Pursuant to the Group’s capital allocation policy, a proportion 
of cash proceeds is reinvested and a proportion is used to deliver a cash return to 
shareholders. The Directors regularly consider the mechanism to be used for such 
cash returns and have determined that this will typically be in the form of share 
buybacks while the share price discount to NAV exceeds 20%. Since the introduction of 
this approach in 2021, the Group has delivered more than £110m of cash returns to our 
shareholders via dividends and share buybacks.
Since launching the £20m share buyback programme in December 2023, IP Group 
has extended the programme by up to an additional £60m including using 100% of 
the proceeds from the secondary sale noted above, and the £10m announced today, 
increasing the total to up to £80m. 
During 2024, the Group purchased 66,110,008 shares for £29.4m and a further 19,325,177 
shares for £9.2m have been purchased so far in 2025. The level of shares purchased is 
now approaching the level of authority approved by shareholders at the Group’s 2024 
AGM. As a result, the Directors are seeking a further shareholder buyback authority to 
ensure the Group retains sufficient flexibility to execute its current buyback programme 
between now and the AGM in June 2025. This authority will be sought at a General 
Meeting, convened for 24 April 2025, with the Notice of General Meeting being posted 
to shareholders today.
Optimising strategy for growth
The Group has many strengths that differentiate it from traditional venture capital 
firms, enabling it to deliver long-term value to investors and the companies it supports. 
By focusing on breakthrough innovations that are serving demand driven by global 
megatrends, the Group is well positioned to address some of the world’s most pressing 
challenges. With a proven track record of nurturing transformative technologies and 
a mission to foster meaningful impact, our approach combines strategic investment 
with operational support to help early-stage businesses succeed. 
As referenced in the Chairman’s Statement, the Group completed a restructuring 
in 2024, reducing ongoing costs by £5m, or some 23%, to ensure the business is 
appropriately sized and well positioned. As part of this process, the Group consolidated 
its balance sheet investment activities under a single investment committee, led by 
Dr Mark Reilly, Managing Partner. The portfolios Dr Reilly has managed for the past six 
years have delivered strong growth and cash realisations and, in his expanded role, he 
will oversee the Group’s balance sheet portfolio with a focus on further improving our 
track record.
A key differentiator for the Group is our deep partnerships with leading research 
institutions, predominantly through our subsidiary, Parkwalk, providing access to a 
pipeline of pioneering scientific research and high-potential intellectual property from 
institutions including the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, and Imperial 
College London. The EIS funds that are managed by Parkwalk provide a complimentary 
source of funding for the earliest stage opportunities and a pipeline of future 
investment opportunities for the Group’s balance sheet. This, coupled with IP Group’s 
access to private scale-up capital, particularly that managed for Hostplus and other 
Australian superannuation funds, provides a flexible approach to funding across all 
stages of company maturity, ensuring we can support our portfolio companies from 
inception through growth and scaling.
Outlook
The Directors continue to believe the Group has a compelling portfolio, evidenced by 
strong commercial progress in many portfolio companies. In addition, the Directors are 
encouraged by some signs of improvement in the private technology sector following 
increased interest and M&A activity in the portfolio during 2024 and signs that appetite 
for IPOs is starting to return. So far in 2025 we have delivered £25m of realisations and 
believe we have the potential to deliver over £250m of exits by the end of 2027.
IP Group also remains well positioned to benefit from government support for a 
number of fiscal and regulatory reforms which support our operating environment, 
and we believe there is scope to further increase our funds under management 
this year.
While the current macro environment remains challenging, the Group is appropriately 
sized, well financed and continues to believe it is well positioned for an improved 
appetite for high growth investments while remaining focused on delivering returns 
for shareholders.
Greg Smith
CEO
24 March 2025
12	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CEO REVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Featurespace is a Cambridge-based developer of Adaptive Behavioural 
Analytics technology which uses machine learning to fight enterprise 
fraud and financial crime.
With a mission to “make the world a safer place to transact”, 
Featurespace works with many of the world’s largest banks and 
financial institutions to protect customers, reducing risk and 
business operating costs. Featurespace was acquired by Visa 
in 2024.
Idea
Combining their expertise in Data Science and Computer 
Science, Featurespace was created by Cambridge University 
Professor, Bill Fitzgerald, and his PhD student, Dave Excell in 2008. 
The idea was to teach machines to think and act like humans 
in an attempt to build a system to outwit fraud attacks and 
manipulation by understanding customer behaviour. 
Featurespace went on to build the world’s first Adaptive 
Behavioural Analytics engine - the ARIC™ Risk Hub – to solve 
this commercial and security challenge. The Risk Hub leverages 
machine learning to enable fraud and suspicious activity to be 
detected in real time. It is then either stopped automatically or 
by sending alerts to anti-money laundering analysts who can 
then prioritise them and follow them up in real time, all with 
explainable anomaly detection.
The Risk Hub now offers adapted solutions for card fraud, 
payment fraud, gaming fraud, application fraud and 
scam detection.
Nurture
Relationships with the Cambridge University science and 
technology community, and with Featurespace customers, 
enabled IP Group Technology Partner, Jon Edington, to be 
introduced to Featurespace. We first invested in 2012, becoming 
the first institutional investor in the company. 
Over the course of seven financing rounds between 2012 and 
2024, IP Group invested a total of £22.9m. Funding from us and 
co-investors enabled the company to develop and scale-up to 
operate globally and significantly grow its customer base to 80 
direct customers, including HSBC, Danske Bank and Worldpay. 
Revenue in 2023 rose 46.5% to £50.4m.
In addition to capital, we played an active role in sourcing and 
securing co-investors, as well as helping Featurespace to hire its 
Chief Executive Officer, Martina King. Jon Edington remained an 
active member of the board up until the sale to Visa, by which 
time IP Group was Featurespace’s largest shareholder.
Impact
Featurespace’s impact on both major financial institutions, as 
well as their individual customers has been profound and far-
reaching with an astonishing 500 million consumers protected 
from risk as a result of its ARIC™ Risk Hub.
For IP Group, the sale of the company to Visa marked a record 
exit. It followed the sale of Garrison earlier in the year, with both 
exits further validating the model and our expertise in identifying 
and supporting businesses to successful outcomes. 
On completion of the sale, IP Group received initial cash 
proceeds of £119m, delivering a 70% premium in net asset 
value from 2023 NAV; an excellent financial return. £25m 
of the proceeds were immediately allocated to our share 
buyback programme in support of our commitment to 
shareholder returns. 
For IP Group, the sale 
of the company to Visa 
marked a record exit. 
It followed the sale of 
Garrison earlier in the 
year, with both exits 
further validating the 
model and our expertise 
in identifying and 
supporting businesses 
to successful outcomes.”
Greg Smith
CEO
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
13
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
BUSINESS MODEL IN ACTION.
FEATURESPACE
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

KEY
01
NAV/share
02
Return on NAV
03
Total portfolio
04
% return on portfolio
05
Portfolio investment
06
Cash proceeds
07
Net overheads %
08
Number of new portfolio 
investments
09
Third-party funds raised
Strategy pillars
2024 progress
Link to KPIs
Objectives for 2025
Have an 
impact on 
the world 
that counts
•	
Ensure genuine impact is a core 
component of our processes
•	
Focus on thematic areas driven 
by the intersection of commercial 
opportunity, societal need and 
IP Group’s distinctive strengths
•	
Develop industry-leading impact 
measurement and reporting
•	
Maintain and develop ethical 
investment framework and 
approach
•	
A “leading” ESG performer rated AAA by MSCI; 
ranked as an industry “Top-Rated” company 
by Sustainalytics; PRIME status in the ISS ESG 
corporate rating
•	
Hysata – largest Series B funding round in 
Australian cleantech history
•	
Technical success at First Light Fusion with a 
record-breaking test of amplifier technology
•	
Positive clinical trial data reported at four Life 
Sciences companies. Istesso’s Phase 2b study for 
leramistat in rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated 
novel mechanism of action and effectiveness in 
bone repair
•	
Reviewed ethical investment framework to ensure 
fit for purpose
03  05
08  09  
•	
Roll out an ESG platform to 
our portfolio companies to 
support them with their ESG 
journeys and provide insights 
to facilitate improvement 
and growth
•	
Continue our portfolio 
company stewardship 
initiatives, including 
reviewing and refreshing 
our Portfolio Company 
Policy Toolkit to ensure our 
portfolio companies have 
access to best practice 
policies in order to promote 
compliance with relevant 
legislation and good 
corporate governance
Develop 
our unique 
insight, 
expertise 
and access
•	
Build significant knowledge, 
presence and investments in 
thematic areas, maintaining deep 
relationships with innovators, 
institutions and capital providers
•	
Continually develop aligned 
Group, sector and geographical 
investment strategies 
•	
Capture, develop and share 
institutional insight and knowledge
•	
Created and invested for the first time in 27 new 
companies including Parkwalk investments
•	
Restructured to form single investment 
committee comprising four partner experts under 
Dr Mark Reilly, Managing Partner
•	
Rationalised investment teams to focus on 
best talent
•	
Integrated processes more closely with Parkwalk 
to source opportunities
05  08
•	
Maintain deal-flow of 
distinctive new opportunities
•	
Continue to build profile as 
deep sector experts with 
institutions, innovators and 
capital providers through 
deep-dives and other 
activities
•	
Further integrate investment 
activities through our 
Investment Group
14	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
STRATEGIC PROGRESS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

KEY
01
NAV/share
02
Return on NAV
03
Total portfolio
04
% return on portfolio
05
Portfolio investment
06
Cash proceeds
07
Net overheads %
08
Number of new portfolio 
investments
09
Third-party funds raised
Read about our KPIs  
on pages 26 and 27
Strategy pillars
2024 progress
Link to KPIs
Objectives for 2025
Accelerate 
value 
creation
•	
Drive short-to-medium-term 
returns through priority portfolio 
companies that disproportionately 
impact returns and underpin the 
business model
•	
Develop and apply capital 
allocation framework across sectors 
and geographies, maintaining 
financial strength through 
balancing investment, realisations 
and shareholder returns
•	
Further develop access to capital 
across the funding spectrum
•	
Explore bold ways of creating value
•	
Total portfolio investment of £63m across 38 
companies
•	
Portfolio raised total £784m of capital funding 
demonstrating quality
•	
Greater focus on exits, revenue generation and 
costs to maintain financial strength. Reduction in 
net overheads of 13%
•	
Total cash proceeds from exits of £183.4m
•	
Two significant exits – Garrison and Featurespace, 
the latter generating cash significantly above 
NAV. Strong pipeline of future realisations
•	
Completed £20m share buyback and majority of 
£10m extension. Announced intention to extend 
the buyback programme in January 2025
01  02
03  04
06  07
09
 
•	
Delivery of priority company 
milestones
•	
Continued focus on exits 
and revenue generation to 
maintain financial strength
•	
Narrow discount between 
share price and NAV/share
•	
Increase managed and 
advised third-party capital 
•	
Continue to buy back equity 
when NAV at >20% discount
Build a truly 
distinctive 
reputation
•	
Develop and maintain a 
distinctive and authentic brand 
for shareholders, founders and 
co-funders
•	
Establish IP Group as an opinion 
leader in key ecosystems, including 
through category brands
•	
Actively promote our financial and 
impact track record
•	
Raised £95m of third-party managed funds; 
third-party AUM now £678m
•	
Won three awards for the Group’s new branding 
and shortlisted for another three
•	
Secured national broadcast and print media 
coverage on key issues
•	
Completed investor relations programme with 
roadshows in the UK, Europe, Middle East and Far 
East, as well as capital markets events
05  06
09
•	
Continue to build recognition 
of IP Group and Parkwalk’s 
status as leading investors in 
science and technology
•	
Continue to help shape 
the operating environment 
through engagement
•	
Continued focus on IR 
programme
Be a 
home for 
exceptional 
talent
•	
Develop, nurture and grow our 
exceptional people, building and 
maintaining the quality of our 
relatively small team
•	
Maintain an engaging, motivating 
employee offer that demonstrates 
our uniqueness
•	
Strongly align remuneration with the 
achievement of our vision
•	
Build our culture and values, 
celebrating diversity, inclusion, 
high-challenge/high-support and 
regenerating success
•	
Delivered 2024 Inclusion and Diversity (“IDP”) 
masterplan objectives, being recognised as the 
“Top Performing VC Fund” in the 2024 Honordex 
Inclusive PE & VC Index
•	
Continued evolution of our employee offer, 
including effective, stakeholder aligned, 
remuneration
•	
Introduction of a streamlined and simplified 
structure, improving decision-making and 
reducing costs
•	
Maintained employee engagement (measured 
by eNPS) in the “very high” category
•	
Successfully embed new 
structure, supporting the 
build of effective teams 
where appropriate
•	
Maintain employee 
engagement in the “very 
high” category
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
15
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC PROGRESS.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Portfolio breakdown
Number of 
companies
Fair value
£m
 Healthier future: Life Sciences
29
348.5
 Healthier future: Oxford Nanopore
1
106.6
 Tech-enriched future: Deeptech
27
89.4
 Regenerative future: Cleantech (Kiko Ventures)
20
215.9
 Platform Investments
5
77.0
Total portfolio
82
837.4
9%
26%
11%
13%
42%
Platform investments are funds or portfolio companies that invest in other opportunities.
Portfolio analysis
Constituent parts of an IP Group share
NAV
97.7 pence 
per share
(4.3)
38.7
11.0
3.7
4.4
7.9
9.4
10.9
16.0
KEY
 Net cash
 Oxa Autonomy Ltd
 Oxford Nanopore  
 Technologies plc
 Hinge Health, Inc
 Other top 10
 Istesso Limited
 Remaining portfolio
 Hysata Pty Ltd
 Other net liabilities
16	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
PORTFOLIO.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Mark Reilly
Managing Partner
The Group’s portfolio performed 
strongly in terms of cash generation 
from full and partial exits, the bulk 
of which came from the sale of two 
companies, Featurespace Ltd and 
Garrison Technology Ltd, from our 
Deeptech portfolio, with the balance 
from Life Sciences. Many of the 
Group’s ‘up and coming’ portfolio 
companies, particularly in Life Sciences, 
have key developmental milestones 
approaching that could have a 
material impact on their value in the 
next six to eighteen months.”
Overview
IP Group invests in innovative breakthrough technologies that address the profound societal and economic 
shifts shaping our future. We invest across three broad themes into companies that contribute to a healthier 
future (Life Sciences), a tech-enriched future (Deeptech) and a regenerative future (Cleantech, through our 
Kiko Ventures platform). In addition, a small number of investments are categorised as platform investments, 
which are funds or portfolio companies that invest in other opportunities.
As at  
31 December 2024
As at  
31 December 2023
Sector
£m
%
£m
%
Healthier future: Life Sciences (ex-ONT)
348.5
41%
393.8
33%
Healthier future: Life Sciences (ONT)
106.6
13%
173.6
15%
Tech-enriched future: Deeptech
89.4
11%
231.4
20%
Regenerative future: Cleantech  
(Kiko Ventures)
215.9
26%
275.3
24%
Platform investments
77.0
9%
90.8
8%
Total portfolio
837.4
100%
1,164.9
100%
In 2024, the Group’s balance sheet investment activities were consolidated with the investment team 
retaining exceptional expertise including the investment partners who delivered the Group’s top portfolio 
achievements over the past several years such as Ceres Power, WaveOptics, Featurespace and Hinge Health. 
Combining deep scientific knowledge with commercial acumen, the team is well-positioned to deliver growth 
in our existing portfolio, identify transformative technologies and capitalise on emerging opportunities.
By targeting opportunities arising from the world’s most significant socioeconomic megatrends such as the 
transition to intelligent computing, climate change, and advancements in healthcare for growing and aging 
populations, we aim to support the development of transformative solutions with global impact. Our portfolio 
companies are at the forefront of these changes, leveraging cutting-edge innovations to solve critical 
challenges and create sustainable value for society and investors alike.
Performance of key holdings
As detailed in the Chief Executive’s Review, the Group’s portfolio performed strongly in terms of cash 
generation from full and partial exits, the bulk of which came from the sale of two companies, Featurespace 
Ltd and Garrison Technology Ltd, from our Deeptech portfolio with the balance from Life Sciences.
Despite this success on realisations, 2024 was a poor year overall for NAV performance with the portfolio 
recording a fair value reduction of 17%. This was driven by substantial value reductions in a handful of our 
most valuable holdings, the largest of which was a £66m fall in the value of our holding in Oxford Nanopore 
Technologies plc. Shares in Oxford Nanopore ended the year 38% lower than they started, albeit having made 
an appreciable recovery from the low point around mid-year.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
17
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
MANAGING PARTNER’S PORTFOLIO REVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

The following table outlines the performance of the Top 10 constituents of our portfolio:
Company
Group stake 
at 
31 December 
2024
%
Net 
investment/ 
(divestment)
£m
Net 
unrealised 
+ realised 
fair value 
movement
£m
Fair value at 
31 December 
2024
£m
Oxford Nanopore 
Technologies plc
8.7%
(0.7)
(66.3)
 106.6 
Istesso Limited
56.5%1
10.0
(31.9)
 91.9 
Hysata Pty Ltd
37.0%
11.7
(4.9)2
 76.8 
Oxa Autonomy Limited
11.8%
–
(22.9)
 42.7 
Hinge Health, Inc.
1.7%
–
2.5
 36.6 
First Light Fusion Limited
27.5%
–
(39.9)
 25.0 
Pulmocide Limited
11.8%
3.7
0.2
 23.1 
Mission Therapeutics 
Limited
21.2%
3.7
3.0
 22.5 
Nexeon Limited
5.1%
–
7.5
 19.4 
Artios Pharma Limited
7.3%
–
0.1
 17.4 
Other portfolio
n/a
(149.2)
(42.4)
 375.4 
Total portfolio
(120.8)
(195.0)
837.4
1	
Represents undiluted economic interest. Voting interest is below 50%
2	 Relates to unrealised FX loss
Despite its share price performance, Oxford Nanopore’s underlying performance has 
remained strong with the company recently reporting underlying revenue growth of 
23% for the year to £179.2m, excluding the impacts of COVID-19 sequencing and the 
Emirati Genome Program. Gross margin increased by 420 basis points to 57.5% (2023: 
53.3%), slightly above guidance, driven by margin improvements across the product 
portfolio, particularly across both PromethION Flow Cells and devices. Oxford Nanopore 
remains well capitalised with £403.8m in cash, cash equivalents and other liquid 
investments as at 31 December 2024 (2023: £472.1m). During the second half of the 
year, Oxford Nanopore raised gross proceeds of £80m, which included a new £50m 
strategic investment from Novo Holdings A/S, a prominent international life sciences 
investor. This strategic partnership is expected to bolster Oxford Nanopore’s position in 
the biopharmaceutical sector, potentially enhancing its value. 
In early 2025, Istesso provided its shareholders with the outcome of its Phase 2b study 
of leramistat in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which was completed in 2024. The leramistat 
Phase 2b study was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 
in adults with moderate-severe RA and an inadequate response to treatment with 
methotrexate. Although the study did not meet the primary endpoint of improvements 
in ACR20 versus placebo, leramistat did demonstrate statistically significant reductions 
in the key secondary endpoint of bone erosions, as well as improvements in disability 
and fatigue. Following the results and reflecting input from our external valuation 
adviser, we have taken the decision to reduce the carrying value by £31.9m. Further 
information on the valuation approach including sensitivity analysis is provided in Note 
13 within the financial statements.
Istesso highlighted that these findings demonstrate leramistat’s unique mechanism of 
action (MOA) and support further evaluation of its potential to promote adaptive tissue 
repair in combination with existing disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) 
in RA, as well as in other chronic conditions.
Istesso also drew attention to the fact that treatment with leramistat significantly 
reduced or stopped the progression of bone erosions. Bone erosions are a central 
feature of RA and appear early in the course of the disease. Progression of bone 
erosions leads to bone damage and is a major driver of disability and increased 
mortality in people living with RA.
Istesso will publish full study results in due course and plans further Phase 2 studies to 
evaluate leramistat’s unique potential to promote adaptive tissue repair in RA, as well 
as other chronic conditions. Istesso is sufficiently funded to conduct these studies.
Hysata is continuing to develop its high-efficiency electrolyser for green hydrogen 
production with an efficiency of 95%, significantly higher than existing commercial 
systems. The company announced in May 2024 that it had secured a record-
breaking $111m Series B funding round, co-led by bp Ventures and Templewater, with 
participation from IP Group. This investment is intended to expand production capacity 
at Hysata’s manufacturing facility in Wollongong, New South Wales, and to advance 
their technology towards gigawatt-scale manufacturing. In December, Hysata 
entered into Joint Development Agreements with POSCO Holdings and POSCO E&C 
to collaboratively enhance electrolyser development through material research and 
engineering, aiming to accelerate the commercialisation of Hysata’s next-generation 
technology. 
While Oxa had a strong year with a number of significant commercial successes, we 
have reduced the carrying value to reflect the contraction in comparator valuations 
since their last funding round in 2022 and the relative scarcity of capital compared to 
that period.
Our innovative nuclear energy company First Light Fusion has not yet succeeded in 
raising new capital but has now pivoted its business model to focus on becoming 
an IP-rich technology provider, leveraging its amplifier technologies for inertial 
confinement fusion (ICF) schemes. This approach has been supported by successful 
validation experiments at the Sandia National Laboratories, breaking performance 
records and showcasing significant potential for commercialisation. We expect the 
company to secure its first revenues imminently. While the company continues to 
18	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
MANAGING PARTNER’S PORTFOLIO REVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

pursue alternative funding options and expect to announce developments soon on 
that front, we have revised the valuation of our holding to reflect current status.
Aside from Oxford Nanopore, Istesso and First Light, the next largest negative 
movement was contributed by a write down for our holding in Ultraleap (£26.5m) 
which experienced commercial headwinds due to slower than expected global uptake 
of Extended Reality (XR) technologies, though the company recently announced a 
partnership to exploit the value of its extensive foundational patents that has the 
potential to yield substantial future value for IP Group if it is successful.
Since the year-end, portfolio company Hinge Health, which we backed from inception, 
filed its IPO prospectus with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. As the 
founding investor in Hinge Health, IP Group has a 1.8% holding in the Company, valued 
by the Group at £36.6m as at 31 December 2024.
Upcoming milestones
Many of the Group’s “up and coming” portfolio companies, particularly in Life Sciences, 
have key developmental milestones approaching that could have a material impact 
on their value in the next six to eighteen months.
In Life Sciences, key trial results are expected from Artios over the next 12 months. Artios 
has a pipeline of novel cancer therapies in development that target DNA Damage 
Response (DDR) pathways to specifically destroy certain cancers that are difficult to 
treat. Artios has built a platform for developing novel inhibitors of specific DNA repair 
enzymes. Its lead programme (ATR inhibitor) is in Phase 2 for a genetic subtype of 
cancers (ATM negative) that is found in several solid tumours including endometrial 
(uterus) cancer, colorectal cancer and ovarian cancer. Initial data was reported in late 
2023 (several confirmed responses, and tumour marker reductions), and full data is 
expected later this year or early 2026. Artios also has a second programme (PolQ) in 
Phase 1/2a with data expected in late 2026.
Iksuda, which is developing next-generation Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs) for 
difficult-to-treat cancers, has two programmes in Phase 1 which are expected to read 
out in the second half of the year while Enterprise Therapeutics is expected to report 
data from its Phase 2a trial of ETD001 for cystic fibrosis in the second half. Enterprise 
Therapeutics is dedicated to the research and development of novel therapies that 
target the underlying mechanisms of mucus congestion in the lungs (one of the main 
causes of difficulty in breathing and increased risk of infection in respiratory diseases 
such as cystic fibrosis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).
Microbiotica, which has a proprietary microbiome profiling platform that allows it 
to identify whether specific bacterial strains have clinical benefits, is also expected 
to issue data from trials of its most advanced programmes (MB097 – its Immuno-
Oncology Programme, and MB310 – its Ulcerative Colitis Programme) toward the end 
of this year/early next year. 
Pulmocide, which is developing inhaled medicines for the treatment of respiratory 
tract infections, is expected to report data from its Phase 3 study of its lead drug 
opelconazole for invasive pulmonary aspergillus (IPA), a life-threatening lung infection 
in 2026. Opelconazole is a potent inhaled antifungal agent for the treatment of 
aspergillus infections of the lung in patients with asthma, cystic fibrosis or following 
lung transplantation.
In Cleantech, portfolio company Hysata remains on course to demonstrate a 100kW 
hydrogen system this year which would be a key validation point in proving the 
capability to scale their breakthrough technology.
Investment focus areas and opportunities
Our investment team has extensive expertise across science, technology, and finance, 
bridging the gap between academic innovation and commercial success, creating 
a thriving ecosystem for high-impact businesses. The Group is also committed to 
impact-driven investment, with a focus on global challenges like climate change, 
healthcare innovation, and resource efficiency.
The team continually assesses new opportunities that have the potential to have a 
positive impact and deliver exceptional returns and continues to develop an exciting 
portfolio of companies across the three sectors we are active in.
Digital Transformation: The global “digital transformation”, characterised by the 
comprehensive integration and relentless increase in sophistication of digital 
technologies in every aspect of society and business, is the most profound and 
pervasive megatrend shaping the future of our world. Global spending in this area is 
forecast to reach $3.4 trillion by 2026.
IP Group has been investing for many years in the fundamental technologies 
enabling this transition including artificial intelligence, future computing hardware, 
human-machine interfaces and next generation communication innovations. We 
are particularly interested in the opportunities for innovation in the compute stack 
presented by the changing demands of processing and storage power required 
for artificial intelligence to operate at the edge of the network. A good example of a 
rising star in this field is our portfolio company Lumai that is pioneering the use of all-
optical neural networks to dramatically accelerate AI computations while reducing 
energy consumption, leveraging photonics technology to overcome the limitations 
of traditional electronic circuits. Another portfolio company, Intrinsic, is developing 
advanced semiconductor memory solutions that could enable faster, more efficient 
data processing, critical for AI applications at the network edge.
The transition to a sustainable, low-carbon economy: In the domain of reducing 
humanity’s future reliance on fossil fuels, our cleantech investment vehicle Kiko 
Ventures is backing breakthrough technologies driving the transition to a sustainable, 
low-carbon economy. Its key focus areas include green hydrogen, energy storage, 
carbon capture and utilisation, resource efficiency, and decarbonisation technologies 
across energy, transportation, and industry. Kiko has backed up-and-coming start-ups 
including University of Oxford spin-outs OxCCU, which is producing sustainable fuels 
and chemicals by converting carbon dioxide and hydrogen into high-value products, 
and Mixergy, which develops smart hot water tanks.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
19
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
MANAGING PARTNER’S PORTFOLIO REVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Healthcare and digital health: Finally, in the healthcare domain we are continuing to 
support our therapeutics assets as they mature through clinical trial phases whilst also 
seeking new opportunities at the boundaries between technology and healthcare in 
the digital health domain, a market that is already worth $347bn worldwide. A good 
example in this domain is our portfolio company Oxehealth, another University of 
Oxford spin-out, that uses advanced video analytics to remotely measure human vital 
signs and activity.
Platform investments
IP Group’s Platform investments portfolio comprises holdings in funds and companies 
that operate in a similar way to IP Group, most significantly our interest in our US 
platform, managed by Longview Innovation, Oxford Science Enterprises Limited, 
Cambridge Innovation Capital Limited, and the UCL Technology Fund in all of 
which IP Group was a founding investor. This portfolio was valued at £77.0m at 
31 December 2024 (2023: £90.8m). 
Having been unable to secure additional significant funding from third parties other 
than $0.9m which the Group invested in 2024, Longview Innovation has significantly 
reduced its cost base and is focused on a number of its most promising portfolio 
companies, resulting in a corresponding portfolio fair value reduction of £9.1m in the 
year (2023: £42.1m reduction).
Number of investments by sector
As at  
31 December 2024
As at  
31 December 2023
Sector
Number
%
Number
%
Healthier future: Life Sciences (ex-ONT)
29
36%
32
37%
Healthier future: Life Sciences (ONT)
1
1%
1
1%
Tech-enriched future: Deeptech
27
33%
32
37%
Regenerative future: Cleantech  
(Kiko Ventures)
20
24%
16
19%
Platform investments
5
6%
5
6%
Total number of portfolio investments1
82
100%
86
100%
1	
Excludes de minimis holdings, which have a small value to the Group and are not actively 
managed to the same extent as core holdings
Portfolio funding position
The following table lists information on the latest possible funding dates for portfolio 
companies where IP Group’s investment holding value is greater than £4m, with the 
dates reflecting the funding position as at the date of publication.
Fair value of 
Group holding at 
31 December 2024 
£m
%
Funded to breakeven
207.6
30%
2025 H1
106.0
15%
2025 H2
23.6
3%
2026
315.5
47%
2027
34.3
5%
Total companies > £4m value
687.0
100%
Companies < £4m value
76.0
 
Interest in Limited Partnerships and Platforms
74.4
 
Total portfolio
837.4
 
20	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
MANAGING PARTNER’S PORTFOLIO REVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

•	 Loss for the period of £207.0m (2023: loss of £174.4m)
•	 Net assets £952.5m (2023: £1,190.3m)
•	 Net assets per share 97.7p (2023: 114.8p) 
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
A summary analysis of the Group’s performance is provided below:
Year ended 
31 December 2024 
£m
Year ended 
31 December 2023 
£m
Net portfolio (loss)1
(195.0)
(160.5)
Net overheads2
(19.8)
(22.5)
Foreign exchange
2.7
0.4
Restructuring costs – labour
(2.4)
–
Restructuring costs – professional
(0.3)
–
Administrative expenses –share-based payments charge
(1.9)
(2.6)
Carried interest plan and other deal incentives credit
7.9
4.7
Net finance income
2.1
4.2
Taxation
(0.3)
1.9
Loss for the year
(207.0)
(174.4)
Other comprehensive (expense)  
(fx on retranslation of foreign subsidiaries)
(3.0)
(0.4)
Total comprehensive loss for the year
(210.0)
(174.8)
Exclude:
Share-based payment charge
1.9
2.6
Return on NAV1
(208.1)
(172.2)
1	
Defined in note 27 Alternative Performance Measures. 
2	 See net overheads table on page 22 and definition in note 27 Alternative Performance Measures.
Net portfolio gains/(losses) consist primarily of realised and unrealised fair value gains and losses from 
the Group’s equity and debt holdings in spin-out businesses, which are analysed in detail in the portfolio 
analysis section. 
David Baynes
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
The Group prioritised generating profitable 
cash realisations and made excellent 
progress in 2024, recording total cash 
proceeds of £183.4m, nearly five times the 
level achieved in 2023. This enabled the 
Group to increase its buyback, as well as 
reinvest for future growth.
While continued delays in private 
company funding rounds, along with 
some company-specific setbacks, 
resulted in NAV falling to 97.7 pence per 
share, we remain confident in portfolio 
valuations and the potential for growth 
in the future.”
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
21
CFOO REVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Fair value movements
A summary of the unrealised and realised fair value gains and losses is as follows:
Year ended 
31 December 2024 
£m
Year ended 
31 December 2023 
£m
Quoted equity & debt investments
(52.0)
(31.8)
Private equity & debt investments
(123.5)
(83.8)
Investments in Limited Partnerships 
(13.1)
(36.5)
Foreign exchange movements
(6.4)
(8.4)
Net portfolio losses
(195.0)
(160.5)
A summary of the largest unrealised and realised fair value gains and losses by 
portfolio investment is as follows:
Gains
£m
Featurespace Limited 
(realised gain)
 56.9 
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc 
(partial realised gain)
 10.3 
Nexeon Limited
 7.5 
Kynos Therapeutics Limited 
(realised gain)
 5.7 
Zihipp Limited (realised gain)
 4.6 
Other quoted (4 companies)
 5.5 
Other private (31 companies)
 22.1 
Foreign exchange
 1.5 
Total
114.1
Losses
£m
Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc (66.3)
First Light Fusion Limited
(39.9)
Istesso Limited
(31.9)
Ultraleap Holdings Limited
(26.5)
Oxa Autonomy Limited
(23.0)
Other quoted (3 companies)
(1.5)
Other private (39 companies)
(112.0)
Foreign exchange
(8.0)
Total
(309.1)
Realised fair value gains
Gains on disposal of equity investments represents the difference between the fair 
value of consideration received and the carrying value at the start of the accounting 
period for the investment in question. The net portfolio loss figure above includes 
£63.7m realised gains, the largest of which relates to the gain on disposal of 
Featurespace, along with several other realised gains marked in the table above. 
Net overheads
Year ended 
31 December 2024 
£m
Year ended 
31 December 2023 
£m
Other income
5.5 
5.9 
Administrative expenses – all other 
expenses
(22.5)
(25.8)
Administrative expenses – annual 
incentive scheme
(2.2)
(2.6)
Net overheads
(19.2)
(22.5)
Other income
Other income comprises fund management fees and licensing and patent income. In 
2024 other income totalled £5.5m (2023: £5.9m), a decrease from 2023 primarily due 
a reduction in licensing and patent income partially offset by a £0.4m increase in fund 
management fees on third party funds.
Other central administrative expenses including 
restructuring costs
Other central administrative expenses, excluding performance-based staff incentives 
and share-based payments charges, have decreased by £2.7m from the prior year to 
£22.5m (2023: £25.8m) because of reductions in non-staff cost across several expense 
categories following a sustained focus on cost reduction. 
In the second half of the year, we completed a restructuring and reorganisation of our 
business, which will reduce our ongoing costs by around £5m per annum or 23% on 
an ongoing basis. This resulted in £2.7m restructuring charge, reflecting the costs of 
redundancies made and other restructuring actions taken including the closure of our 
Hong Kong operations. 
The charge of £2.2m (2023: £2.6m) in respect of the Group’s Annual Incentive Scheme, 
reflects a provisional assessment of performance against 2024 AIS targets which 
include Group, Team, and Individual performance elements as described in the 
Directors Remuneration Report.
Other income statement items
The share-based payments charge of £1.9m (2023: £2.6m) reflects the accounting 
charge for the Group’s Restricted Share Plan, Long-Term Incentive Plan and Deferred 
Bonus Share Plan. This non-cash charge reflects the fair value of services received 
from employees, measured by reference to the fair value of the share-based 
payments at the date of award, but has no net impact on the Group’s total equity or 
net assets.
22	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CFOO REVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Carried interest plan credit
The carried interest plan credit of £7.9m (2023: £4.7m credit) relates to the 
recalculation of liabilities under the Group’s carry schemes, with the credit in the 
year reflecting this year’s reduction in value of assets within the scheme. As at 
31 December 2024, 65% by value of the Group’s equity & debt investments were 
included within carry scheme arrangements (2023: 70%). The liabilities are calculated 
based upon any excess of current fair value above cost and hurdle rate of return 
within each scheme or vintage. Any payments will only be made following the full 
achievement of cost and hurdle via cash realisations and are only paid on the event of 
a cash realisation. 
Consolidated statement of financial position
A summary analysis of the Group’s assets and liabilities is provided below:
Year ended 
31 December 2024 
£m
Year ended 
31 December 2023 
£m
Portfolio
837.4
1,164.9 
Other non-current assets
20.4
10.2 
Other net current assets/(liabilities)
(4.7) 
(7.5) 
Cash and deposits
285.6
226.9 
Borrowings
(129.1)
(135.2)
Other non-current liabilities 
(57.1)
(69.0)
Total Equity or Net Assets (“NAV”)
952.5 
1,190.3 
NAV per share
97.7p
114.8p
The composition of, and movements in, the Group’s portfolio are described in the 
portfolio review above.
Portfolio valuations
2024 saw an increase in the level of capital raised by the portfolio compared to 2023, 
with £784m raised (2023: £667m), with our Life Sciences portfolio seeing a particularly 
active fundraise period. Across 19 fundraises within our portfolio, 10 were “up” financing 
rounds (i.e. raised at a higher valuation than the previous financing rounds), 3 were 
“flat” rounds and 6 were “down” rounds. All 6 down rounds had already been reflected 
in our 2023 valuations, either reflecting our assessment of setbacks within the 
businesses in question leading to valuation adjustments, or due to visibility of the terms 
of a forthcoming early-2024 financing. The proportion of down rounds was higher than 
has been seen in previous years, reflecting challenging market conditions. In addition, 
we have reflected valuation reductions in a number of cases where valuation rounds 
have been delayed and which are therefore not included in the statistics on the right. 
Year ended 
31 December 2024
Year ended 
31 December 2023
Analysis of priced funding  
rounds in private portfolio
Number
%
Number
%
Up round
10
52%
13
62%
Flat round
3
16%
3
14%
Down round
6
32%
5
24%
Total
19
100%
21
100%
The above table reflects priced funding rounds in the private portfolio (excluding 
organic and de minimis companies) and excludes debt funding and funding 
transactions where a subsequent tranche is drawn based on pre-agreed pricing.
The table below summarises the valuation basis for the Group’s portfolio. Further 
details on the Group’s valuation policy and approach can be found in notes 13 and 14. 
Year ended 
31 December 2024 
£m
Year ended 
31 December 2023 
£m
Quoted
133.1
203.8
Financing transaction (<12 months) 
217.8
187.9
Financing transaction (>12 months) 
54.9
162.7
Other: Future market/commercial events
60.7
25.0
Other: Adjusted financing price based on 
past performance – upwards
35.9
99.9
Other: Adjusted financing price based on 
past performance – downwards
152.7
203.9
Other: Discounted cash flow (“DCF”)
97.2
126.6
Other: Revenue multiple
13.1
85.4
Fair value of investments
765.4
1,095.2
Statements from LP
58.1
69.7
Assets held for sale
13.9
–
Total portfolio
837.4
1,164.9
Within the ‘other: DCF’ category above, the largest individual amount relates to 
the Group’s investment in Istesso Limited. Details of the critical estimates and 
valuation sensitivities in respect of this investment are included in Note 13 within the 
Group’s accounts.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
23
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
CFOO REVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Other assets and liabilities
The majority of other long-term assets relate to amounts receivable on sale of equity 
and debt investments, representing deferred and contingent consideration amounts 
to be received in more than one year.
Other long-term liabilities relate principally to carried interest (described above), and 
loans from LPs of consolidated funds. The Group consolidates the assets of a fund 
in which it has a significant economic interest, IP Venture Fund II LP. Loans from third 
parties of consolidated funds represent third-party loans into this partnership. These 
loans are repayable only upon these funds generating sufficient realisations to repay 
the Limited Partners.
Borrowings
On 2 August 2022, the Group signed a Note Placing Agreement (“NPA”) to issue a £120m 
debt private placement, primarily with Phoenix Group. The notes are repaid in £40m 
tranches in December in 2027, 2028 and 2029. The interest rate is fixed at an average 
of 5.25%. The Group also has a £9.4m EIB debt facility which is being repaid between 
now and January 2026 (£6.3m of the EIB debt will be repaid within twelve months of the 
period end).
Under the terms of the NPA, the Group is required to maintain a minimum cash 
balance of £25m at any time, equity must be at least £500m and gross debt less 
restricted cash must not exceed 25% of total equity as at the Group’s 30 June and 
31 December reporting dates. The NPA also includes ‘Cash Trap’ provisions which 
stipulate that the Group is required to maintain cash and cash equivalents of no 
less than £50m at any time, equity must be at least £750m, and gross debt less 
restricted cash must not exceed 20% of total equity as at the Group’s 30 June and 
31 December reporting dates. In the event of the Cash Trap being triggered, the 
Group is not permitted to pay or declare a dividend or purchase any of its shares. In 
addition, investments are restricted to £2.5m per calendar quarter other than those 
legally committed to. The Group is also required to place the net proceeds of all cash 
proceeds (over a threshold of £1m) into a blocked bank account. Entering a Cash Trap 
does not constitute a default under the NPA.
All covenants have been met throughout the period. For further details of the Group’s 
loans including covenant details see note 18.
Cash and deposits
At 31 December 2024, the Group’s cash and deposits totalled £285.6m, an increase 
of £58.7m from a total of £226.9m at 31 December 2023, predominantly due to 
realisations of £183.4m.offset by outflows from portfolio investment of £63.0, a £25.1m 
net cash outflow from operations and £29.6m of share buybacks. 
The principal constituents of the movement in cash and deposits during the period are 
as follows:
Investments and realisations
The Group invested a total of £63.0m across 38 portfolio companies during the year 
(2023: £73.2m; 33) and realised cash proceeds of £183.4m (2023: £38.6m).
Largest investments and realisations by portfolio company:
Investments
£m
Cash realisations
£m
Hysata Pty Ltd
11.7 
Featurespace Limited
118.8 
Istesso Limited
10.0 
Garrison Technology Limited
 29.9 
Pulmocide Limited
 3.7 
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
 10.6 
Mission Therapeutics Limited
 3.7 
Kynos Therapeutics Limited
 9.2 
Genomics Limited
 3.1 
Zihipp Limited
 4.4 
Other
30.8
Other
10.5
Total
63.0
Total
183.4
Treasury policy
It remains the Group’s policy to place cash that is surplus to near-term working capital 
requirements on short-term and overnight deposits with financial institutions that 
meet the Group’s treasury policy criteria or in low-risk treasury funds rated prime or 
above. The Group’s treasury policy is described in detail in note 3 to the Group financial 
statements alongside details of the credit ratings of the Group’s cash and deposit 
counterparties. 
24	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CFOO REVIEW.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Dividend and share buyback 
In its 2023 results, the Group reiterated the Board’s commitment to making regular 
cash returns to shareholders from realisations but announced that, in light of the 
prevailing discount between the Company’s share price and its NAV per share, these 
regular cash returns will normally be made in the form of share buybacks when the 
share price discount to NAV exceeds 20%. As a result, no dividends were paid in the 
period (HY23: £7.7m, 2023: £13.0m), and instead the Group has been engaged in a 
buyback programme since late 2023. 
During 2024, the Company purchased 45,280,605 ordinary shares (2023: 200,302 
ordinary shares), with an aggregate value of £0.9m (2023: £0.2k) which were initially 
held in treasury prior to being cancelled in September 2024 along with a further 
26,493,520 treasury shares held at the start of the year which were also cancelled 
at the same time. A further 20,609,101 shares with an aggregate value of £0.5m were 
purchased in the period September to December 2024 and immediately cancelled.
In January 2025 the Group launched a further extension by up to £40m of its buyback 
programme, which had been announced in December 2024. In March 2025, as part of 
the Group’s preliminary results statement, the Group announced its intention to extend 
the buyback programme by a further £10m.
The Directors are seeking shareholder buyback authority at a General Meeting, 
convened for 24 April 2025 to ensure the Group retains sufficient flexibility to execute its 
current buyback programme in the intervening period leading up to the AGM in June 
2025, with the Notice of General Meeting being posted to shareholders.
Taxation
The Group’s business model seeks to deliver long-term value to its stakeholders 
through the commercialisation of fundamental research carried out at its partner 
universities. To date, this has been largely achieved through the formation of, and 
provision of services and development capital to, spin-out companies formed around 
the output of such research. The Group primarily seeks to generate capital gains 
from its holdings in spin-out companies over the longer term but has historically 
made annual net operating losses from its operations from a UK tax perspective. 
Capital gains achieved by the Group would ordinarily be taxed upon realisation of 
such holdings; however, since the Group typically holds more than 10% in its portfolio 
companies and those companies are themselves trading, most of the portfolio will 
qualify for the Substantial Shareholdings Exemption (“SSE”) on disposal. 
This exemption provides that gains arising on the disposal of qualifying holdings are 
not chargeable to UK corporation tax and, as such, the Group has continued not to 
recognise a provision for deferred taxation in respect of uplifts in value on those equity 
holdings that meet the qualifying criteria. Gains arising on sales of holdings which do 
not qualify for SSE will ordinarily give rise to taxable profits for the Group, to the extent 
that these exceed the Group’s ability to offset gains against current and brought 
forward tax losses (subject to the relevant restrictions on the use of brought-forward 
losses). In such cases, a deferred tax liability is recognised in respect of estimated tax 
amount payable.
The Group complies with relevant global initiatives including the US Foreign Account 
Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) and the OECD Common Reporting Standard.
Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”) 
The Group discloses alternative performance measures, such as NAV per share and 
Return on NAV, in this Annual Report. The Directors believe that these APMs assist in 
providing additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance, and 
position of the Group. 
Further information on APMs utilised by the Group is set out in Note 27.
David Baynes
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
24 March 2025
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
25
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
CFOO REVIEW.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

01
NAV/share p1
02 Return on NAV £1
Net Assets divided by the number of outstanding 
shares in issue. A useful measure to compare to 
the Group’s share price.
Profit for the year excluding share-based 
payment charges. Shows a summary of the 
income statement gains and losses that directly 
impact NAV.
125.3
167.0
132.9
114.8
97.7
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
Link to 
remuneration
Yes
189.5
452.2
(341.1)
(172.2)
(208.1)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
Link to 
remuneration
Yes
03 Total portfolio £m1
04 % return on portfolio1
Equity and debt investments plus investments 
into limited partnership interests. Shows assets 
generating investment returns.
Net portfolio gains or (losses) as a percentage of 
total portfolio value. A useful measure to compare 
annual returns.
1184.9
1507.5
1258.5
1164.9
837.4
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
 
Link to 
remuneration
Yes
21
42
(20)
(13)
(23)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
Link to 
remuneration
Yes
Our KPIs measure performance 
against our strategy.
KEY
Have an impact on the world that counts
Develop our unique insight, expertise and access
Accelerate value creation
Build a truly differentiated reputation
Be a home for exceptional talent
1	 Alternative performance measure. See note 27 for definition and reconciliation to IFRS primary statements.
26	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

05 Portfolio investment £m1
06 Cash proceeds £m
07 Net overheads %1
The purchase of equity and debt investments plus 
investments into limited partnership interests. A 
useful measure to compare annual investment in 
the portfolio.
The total amount received from the disposal of 
interests in portfolio companies and distributions 
from limited partnership funds. Realised funds 
are invested into new opportunities or returned to 
shareholders.
The Group’s core overheads less operating income 
as a percentage of net assets. Reflects the Group’s 
controllable “cash-equivalent” cost base in 
proportion to net assets.
72.0
106.7
93.5
73.2
63.0
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
 
 
Link to remuneration
Yes
191.0
213.4
28.1
38.6
183.4
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
 
Link to remuneration
Yes
1.6
1.1
1.5
1.9
2.1
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
Link to remuneration
Yes
08 Number of new portfolio 
investments
09 Third-party assets under 
management £m
The number of portfolio investments that received 
initial capital from the Group during the year. A 
measure of the Group’s ability to find and invest 
in new opportunities. Revised in 2023 to include 
Parkwalk investments.
Third-party funds and capital managed or advised 
by the Group. Shows progress against the Group’s 
stated objective to increase capital managed on 
behalf of third-party investors.
22
28
15
10
27
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
 
Link to remuneration
Yes
541.9
586.6
696.8
650.9
678.0
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Link to strategy
 
 
Link to remuneration
Yes
1	 Alternative performance measure. See note 27 for definition and reconciliation to IFRS primary statements.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
27
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

We are focused on having an impact on the world that counts
Driven by our purpose, we are working at the cutting edge of sectors that are changing 
the world. Our three investment themes align our efforts with some of the most 
pressing challenges facing humanity and our planet: curing and preventing disease; 
managing complex data to solve complex problems; and the decarbonisation of 
energy systems to limit climate change. At the same time, we consider how the 
way we run our business can maximise impact – through strong governance and 
ethical practice; for our exceptionally talented people; for our communities and the 
environment; and by supporting our portfolio companies to do the same.
Environment and climate 
IP Group’s carbon footprint and exposure to 
climate risk as an organisation is low. Through 
our investments in carbon capture, nuclear 
fusion and hydrogen technology, we also have 
a significant opportunity to support the global 
transition away from fossil fuels in support 
of the Paris Climate Agreement. IP Group’s 
Deeptech investments include technologies that 
are working to improve product performance 
whilst reducing energy consumption, from new 
computing architectures to next generation 
wireless networks. 
Social
We are a responsible organisation that seeks 
to have a positive impact on people and 
society through our investments and the way 
we operate. We conduct all of our operating 
and business activities in an honest, ethical 
and socially responsible manner, acting 
professionally, fairly and with integrity in all 
business dealings and relationships. Our culture 
and internal frameworks guide our behaviour 
and help us focus on the things that really matter 
– such as meeting our commitments, developing 
and supporting our people, furthering diversity 
and inclusion, and making a difference in our 
communities. In our Life Sciences portfolio we 
are building companies for a healthier future 
and in our Deeptech portfolio companies that 
will support current and future societal needs in 
computing, communication and mobility. 
Governance
IP Group endeavours to conduct business in 
accordance with established best practice, 
to be a responsible employer, and to adopt 
appropriate values and standards. We take 
our duty as active, responsible investors 
and stewards seriously, and our governance 
practices in relation to our portfolio companies. 
The Group’s Board of Directors oversees the 
Group’s approach to ESG and ensures that 
ESG factors are incorporated into the Board’s 
decision-making process. Further details on 
the day-to-day responsibility for ESG matters is 
set out on page 32. In 2024 the Group’s Annual 
Incentive Scheme (“AIS”) once again contained a 
hybrid ESG metric. 50% relates to outperforming 
ESG benchmarks and 50% relates to progressing 
the collection and analysis of data and 
development of impact metrics for the portfolio. 
See page 93 for further details.
28	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
MEANINGFUL IMPACT.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Engaging our team
Ensuring our people remain engaged, motivated and aligned with our purpose is as 
critical as ever. We recognise the benefits of engaging with our people regularly via 
a range of channels, to ensure we are able to develop a positive two-way dialogue, 
with both individual employees and representative groups. Our primary measure of 
engagement is taken from our Voice of IP Group (“VIP”) surveys.
Our Designated Non-executive Director, Aedhmar Hynes, remains directly responsible 
for workforce engagement, acting as a conduit between the Board and the wider 
team. Aedhmar attends the regular meetings of our employee forum, IP Connect, 
which are facilitated by Anthony York, Group People Director.
IP Connect is a group of employees elected by employees to represent workforce 
views. It is consulted regularly for both general and specific feedback on cultural 
development as well as other matters. During 2024 the group continued to meet 
regularly and provided valuable feedback on a number of key areas, including our 
Group values, Executive and wider remuneration, flexible working arrangements and 
the corporate reorganisation. 
Finally, the small size of our overall team means that we are able to ensure that all of 
our people have direct and consistent access to leadership, both informally on a day-
to-day basis and through more formal channels, and at regular all-employee events.
Ethical behaviour
We strive to always conduct our business activities in an honest, ethical and 
socially responsible manner and to comply with all laws, regulations and rules 
applicable to our business. We expect our portfolio companies, co-investors, 
employees and suppliers to hold the same high standards when conducting their 
respective businesses.
We are committed to acting professionally and with integrity in all of our 
business dealings and relationships, and with consideration for the needs of all of 
our stakeholders.
We have adopted policies and standards designed to help and guide employees 
in their conduct and business relationships. We take a zero-tolerance approach to 
breaches of our policies, and implement and enforce effective systems to mitigate risk. 
We provide mandatory training on critical areas such as anti-bribery and corruption, 
market abuse, anti-tax evasion and data privacy matters. Copies of our key policies 
can be found on our website www.ipgroupplc.com.
Human rights and modern slavery
We believe that human rights are universal and non-negotiable. We seek to 
promote a working environment where workers are treated with respect, dignity and 
consideration, and their fundamental human rights are protected. We comply fully 
with applicable human rights legislation in the countries in which we operate, which 
includes upholding freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining, 
equal remuneration and protection against discrimination. 
We are committed to implementing and enforcing effective systems and controls 
to ensure modern slavery is not taking place anywhere in our business or supply 
chain. We expect the same high standards from our contractors, suppliers and other 
business partners. We have adopted principles and policies which are relevant to the 
prevention of modern slavery in our organisation. These are overseen and monitored 
by our ESG and Ethics Committees. The Company has in place a new supplier checklist, 
which includes a confirmation from all new suppliers that they comply in all respects 
with the Modern Slavery Act. Our Modern Slavery Statement and our Human Rights 
Statement can be found on our website www.ipgroupplc.com.
Gender diversity
In the recent past we have focused on gender representation as a proxy of our 
progress in this area and, with appropriate data, we will seek to move beyond this 
narrow definition of diversity. 
Gender split as at 31 December 2024
Male
Female
Number
%
Number
%
Board
4
57%
3
43%
Executive team
7
70%
3
30%
Other senior management/Partners
12
57%
9
43%
Combined senior leadership team
18
60%
12
40%
All employees
32
46%
37
54%
This gender diversity data is determined consistently with the information submitted to 
FTSE Women Leaders, accounting for changes to the shape of the organisation after 
the submission date. Greg Smith (CEO) and David Baynes (CFOO) are included in data 
for the Board and for the Executive team.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
29
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
MEANINGFUL IMPACT.
ESG DISCLOSURES.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Board and Executive Management diversity
Listing Rules LR 6.6.6R (10) and (11) require the Group to publish information on 
Board diversity. Data is for the IP Group Board and Executive Management on 
31 December 2024.
Numbers in this table are based on how individuals identify themselves, based on data 
which is a subset of data collected regularly from all individuals on a wholly voluntary 
basis. Further detail on our Parker Review submission, including our target for senior 
management team representation, is set out on page 74. 
Executive Management data is for the Executive team. Greg Smith (CEO) and David 
Baynes (CFOO) are included in Board data but not the Executive Management data.
Gender 
Men
Women
Not specified/
prefer not to say
Number of Board members
4
3
–
Percentage of the Board
57%
43%
–
Number of senior positions on the Board 
(CEO, CFO, SID and Chair)
3 (75%)
1 (25%)
–
Number in Executive Management
5
3
–
Percentage of Executive Management
62.5%
37.5%
–
Ethnic background 
White British or other 
White (including 
minority-white groups)
Mixed/
Multiple 
Ethnic groups
Asian/
Asian 
British
Black/African/
Caribbean/Black 
British
Other ethnic 
group, including 
Arab
Not specified/
prefer not to 
say
Number of Board members
6
–
1
–
–
–
Percentage of the Board
86%
–
14%
–
–
–
Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, SID and Chair)
4 (100%)
–
–
–
–
–
Number in Executive Management
7
–
1
–
–
–
Percentage of Executive Management
87.5%
–
12.5%
–
–
–
Environment
IP Group’s carbon footprint and exposure to climate risk is low but, as a responsible 
business, we continue to focus on managing and reducing the entirety of our 
environmental footprint. We aim to become a Net Zero company by 2030 and aim 
to achieve this ambition within the time frame by taking a pragmatic approach and 
using high-quality carbon offsets. 
Sustainable London HQ
Our headquarters in Kings Cross is in an energy-efficient development. The building 
has been awarded a BREEAM “outstanding” rating and uses the most efficient route to 
create clean localised heat and power. 
Environmental disclosures
IP Group is required to report on its annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions as 
part of the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Report) Regulations 
2018. IP Group is also required to report in line with Streamlined Energy and Carbon 
Reporting (“SECR”) requirements. These requirements include an overview of GHG 
emissions, intensity ratios, energy consumption and energy efficiency actions taken by 
IP Group over the reporting period for operational office locations. These disclosures 
can be found in the table on page 31. See our Task Force on Climate-Related Financial 
Disclosures (“TCFD”) disclosure on page 32. 
The table on page 31 shows IP Group’s annual energy consumption for global 
operations, associated relevant greenhouse gas emissions and additional related 
information. This encompasses energy and emissions from office use and has been 
expanded beyond the minimum requirements to include emissions associated with 
business travel, staff commuting and IT purchases. 
The methodology used for the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions is the “GHG 
Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard”. An “operational control” 
boundary has been applied. Carbon conversion factors have been taken from “UK 
Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting – 2022”. Emissions are 
reported as tCO2e. Scope 2 emissions are reported as “location-based”. Of our total 
reported energy consumption, 105,566 kWh was directly related to our UK operations, 
producing GHG emissions of 25 tCO2e, 86% of our total.
30	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
MEANINGFUL IMPACT.
ESG DISCLOSURES.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Energy consumption and emissions
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Difference 
vs 2023
On-site combustion (kWh)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
–
Electricity (kWh)
67,165 169,604 122,880
92,245 110,365
20%
Road transport (kWh)
n/a
17,463 
n/a
n/a
n/a
–
Total Energy (kWh)
67,165 187,067 122,880 92,245 110,365
20%
Scope 1 emissions (tCO2e)
–
–
–
–
–
–
Scope 2 emissions (tCO2e)
21
41
24
19
29
53%
Scope 3 emissions (tCO2e)
118
42
103
331
218
(34%)
Total emissions (tCO2e)
139
83
127
350
247
(29%)
Emissions intensity 
tCO2e/FTE
1.4
0.9
1.46
3.7
2.7
(27%)
Emissions intensity 
tCO2e/m2
0.07
0.05
0.15
0.4
0.3
(25%)
Emissions intensity
IP Group reports two metrics: emissions/staff number in FTE, and emissions per unit of 
office floor area in m2. The resulting emission intensity calculations for 2024 are:
•	
2.7 tCO2e/FTE
•	
0.3 tCO2e/m2
Our intensity metrics have fallen by 27% and 25% respectively.
Performance 
Our Scope 2 emissions increased by 53% vs. 2023 as a result of employees spending 
more time in our offices. Scope 3 emissions fell by 34%, primarily as a result of fewer 
long haul flights being taken during the year. 
Energy efficiency actions
Our offices incorporate a number of energy-efficient technologies: the majority of 
light fittings are low energy LED, and motion sensors are installed to maximise energy 
efficiency. Other appliances and large office equipment such as printers and laptops 
are of energy-efficient design. In 2024 our team participated in the “10 in 10” collective 
energy reduction campaign at our office estate, the goal of which was to achieve a 
10% reduction in energy consumption during a ten-week period.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
31
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
MEANINGFUL IMPACT.
ESG DISCLOSURES.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

IP Group’s carbon footprint and overall 
exposure to climate risk is low. Through 
our investments we have an opportunity 
to contribute to the transition away from 
fossil fuels and enable organisations 
and governments to meet their Net 
Zero goals sooner and support the Paris 
Agreement on climate. 
We are well positioned on each of the four elements of 
climate-related financial disclosures recommended by 
the TCFD. 
Governance
Our Board and various Committees ensure active and 
ongoing oversight of the Group’s management of 
climate-related risk and opportunities. 
Strategy
Climate-related risks and opportunities are 
integrated into our broader Group-level strategy 
and operational processes. The Group’s strategy, 
taking into consideration different climate-related 
scenarios is resilient. Our purpose focuses us on impact 
and we back and support businesses that aim to 
meaningfully contribute to a healthier, tech-enriched 
and regenerative future, including businesses whose 
technologies support action on climate.
Risk Management
We adopt a multifaceted approach to understanding 
potential risks to our business and portfolio companies 
and ensuring that appropriate mitigations and controls 
are enacted for material issues. Climate-related 
risks are included in these efforts. We benchmark our 
overall ESG and climate risk management process and 
disclosures with external ESG ratings agencies, to ensure 
that we are in line with or above peers.
Metrics and Targets
In the short term, we aim to become a Net Zero 
company by 2030, and aim to achieve this ambition 
within this time frame by taking a pragmatic approach 
and using high quality carbon offsets in respect of 
Scope 2 and 3 emissions. We have already reduced 
our overall operational emissions using various other 
strategies to date, including the implementation of 
hybrid working, moving offices to more sustainable 
premises, undertaking business travel only when 
necessary, and working with our suppliers to reduce 
Scope 3 emissions. Whilst we believe that we should 
continue to pursue emissions mitigation activities 
for Scope 3 emissions, given that fully decarbonised 
aviation technologies will not be available at scale by 
2030, we are planning to meet our commitment to Net 
Zero in the short term using high-quality carbon offsets. 
In the medium to long term, we are investing in 
companies which are creating low carbon solutions, as 
demonstrated in the opportunities section on page 36. 
Further, we do not invest, and do not intend to invest, in 
carbon emitting infrastructure. 
A summary of our compliance with the recommended 
TCFD disclosures can be found on page 37.
Governance
Our approach to ESG and responsible investment and 
our related policies are overseen by the Board. 
The Board has delegated accountability for climate risk 
and strategy (including monitoring our commitment 
to becoming a Net Zero company) to the Executive 
Directors, with the CFOO having overall responsibility 
for ESG and climate matters. Our investment process 
considers and incorporates ESG matters, including 
compliance with our Ethical Investment Framework, 
which is overseen by our Ethics Committee. Our ESG 
Committee has responsibility for the oversight and 
implementation of our ESG and Sustainability policy, 
monitoring current ESG practices within our portfolio 
companies and ensuring good stewardship and 
governance of our portfolio companies. 
Committee mandates and responsibilities
Board
The Board oversees climate-related matters which take into account climate-related 
risks and opportunities.
The CFOO has overall responsibility for ESG and climate matters and three members 
of the Board play an active role in the functioning and duties of the ESG Committee. 
Key matters pertaining to ESG and climate-related risks are discussed amongst the 
Executive Team and at the Board. An update on the Group’s ESG activities, as well as 
key matters or considerations with respect to climate or broader ESG, are included in 
the regular CFOO update to the Board. 
Climate-related considerations are factored into the broader IP Group risk 
management process and risk register.
ESG Committee
The ESG Committee meets on a regular basis, and has day to day responsibility for 
implementing the Group’s ESG strategy, defining the Group’s ESG risk policy, reviewing 
climate risks, monitoring adherence to climate risk tolerance, and reviewing all key 
climate-related risks and opportunities.
The Committee is chaired by the CEO and attended by the CFOO, a Non-executive 
Director, Director of Communications, UK General Counsel, and representatives from 
our investment partnerships and operational teams.
32	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Strategy
Our approach to assessing and 
managing climate-related risks and 
opportunities
IP Group carries out a climate risk and opportunities 
analysis of its operations and most material companies. 
The methodology used in our 2023 analysis aligned to 
the TCFD recommendations and reporting framework. 
It considered a short-to-medium-term, and a long-
term time horizon, and used Network for Greening the 
Financial System (“NGFS”) scenarios to assess physical 
and transition risks for different time horizons and assess 
potential material financial impact on the organisation. 
This work was updated in 2024 to account for changes 
to the Group’s portfolio in the year and was found to be 
sound with no material changes to risks or opportunities.
Full details of the approach and findings were published 
in our 2023 Annual Report (pages 48 to 56) and a 
summary is provided below. 
Time horizons: Due to the long-term nature of our 
investments and given the size and stage of our 
companies we do not anticipate material risks within a 
time horizon less than five years. Climate-related issues 
often manifest themselves over the medium and longer 
terms and for this reason we looked at periods over five 
years and up to ten years as medium term and over ten 
years as long term. 
Scope: We considered key risks at our organisational 
level (IP Group) in addition to key risks at an investment 
level (with respect to the portfolio in which we invest). 
The determination of the severity of the risk assessed 
both physical risks and transition risks. 
NGFS scenarios tested: Orderly transition scenario; 
Disorderly transition scenario; Hothouse world scenario.
Analysis approach:
Materiality analysis
Identify likely material sustainability issues for our Group and portfolio.
Scenario analysis
Overlay key material issues identified for physical and transition risks, across various 
scenarios aligned with the NGFS for different time horizons. 
Risk analysis
Gauge level of risks across physical and transition dimensions. 
Disclosure
Summarise key findings and highlight any mitigation actions for risks and any actions 
with respect to opportunities identified. 
Global themes: Looking at the macro landscape, we see 
three global themes relevant to us as a Group: 
•	
Increasing societal imperative for a regenerative 
world accelerating the demand for changes in 
industry structure and social and economic reforms
•	
Increasing climate regulation
•	
Increasing capital flow into climate transition 
technologies 
Overall conclusions:
•	
There were no red flags identified and overall climate 
risk at Group and portfolio level is low. See summary 
tables on pages 34 and 35.
•	
Our Group and portfolio are highly resilient to the 
transition to a lower-carbon economy consistent 
with a 1.5°C or lower scenario, and additional 
scenarios consistent with increased physical 
climate-related risks.
•	
The portfolio is well positioned to benefit from the 
transition to a low carbon world due to its low 
exposure to climate-related risks and because of the 
large number of companies whose core technology 
and/or product offering address opportunities for 
energy transition.
•	
Climate-related R&D and innovation, expansion of 
low emission goods and services across the portfolio, 
and successful investment in new technologies were 
identified as the most material opportunities for 
IP Group. See page 36.
Risk Management
Risks and resilience
Our risk analysis used quantitative scoring for key 
material factors across the three NGFS climate 
scenarios. We used a time horizon extending to 2050 for 
physical risks and a time horizon of 2040 for transition 
risks. 
See 2023 Annual Report pages 50 and 51 for detail on 
our assessment approach, scenarios, TCFD factors 
considered, and scoring approach.
IP Group risk summary
The 2023 analysis concluded that risk to IP Group is low 
across all scenarios in the following TCFD categories: 
•	
Policy and legal risk (transition risks) from 
increasingly stringent reporting requirements around 
climate risk, including TCFD and SECR.
•	
Market risk and reputational risk (transition risks) 
from failing to incorporate climate change fully into 
investment screening and due diligence processes.
•	
Acute risk and Chronic risk (physical risks) caused by 
business interruption due to extreme weather events 
taking electricity or telecommunications networks 
offline.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
33
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Summary of key risks
Climate scenarios
Risk description
Orderly 
Transition
Disorderly 
Transition
Hot House 
World
Mitigation measures
IP Group plc: Policy/legal risk from 
increasingly stringent reporting 
requirements around climate risk, including 
TCFD and SECR.
TCFD Risk category: Policy and Legal Risks 
(Transition Risks)
Ensure robust climate governance 
structure is in place, which appropriately 
manages climate risks throughout 
the organisation, including specifying 
which climate considerations should be 
considered as part of pre-investment due 
diligence.
IP Group plc: Risk of failing to incorporate 
climate change fully into investment 
screening and due diligence process.
TCFD Risk category: Market Risk and 
Reputation Risk (Transition Risks)
Formalise the incorporation of climate 
change specific risk screening questions in 
the pre-investment due diligence process.
IP Group plc: Business interruption because 
of extreme weather events taking electricity 
or telecommunications networks offline.
TCFD Risk category: Acute Risk and Chronic 
Risk (Physical Risks)
Develop back up and resiliency plans 
which account for potential impacts of 
climate change.
Portfolio: Risk of supply chain disruption, 
which limits the availability of component 
parts required for manufacturing for 
certain companies.
TCFD Risk category: Acute Risk and Chronic 
Risk (Physical Risks)
Support portfolio companies to review 
supplier sourcing strategies; encourage 
companies to develop contingency plans 
for when one supplier is affected; and 
encourage companies to avoid over 
concentration of risk with key suppliers.
Portfolio: Risk of increased cost of raw 
materials and production costs.
TCFD Risk category: Acute Risk and Chronic 
Risk (Physical Risks)
Support portfolio companies to explore 
whether certain inputs can be substituted 
for others that may be more cost effective 
or have higher availability; and encourage 
portfolio companies to develop diversified 
supplier sourcing strategies.
KEY
LOW
Low impact to overall business 
model/operations and revenue 
streams. There is minimal, if any 
impact to the operations/revenue 
streams and/financial position, of 
the company. 
MEDIUM
Medium impact to business model/
operations and revenue streams. 
There could be some disruption, 
but the business is able to adapt/
mitigate and continue operations. 
The core service/product offering 
and/or financial position, is not 
impacted.
HIGH
There could be a major impact to 
either the operational capability 
and/or products and services. 
The company suffers severe 
disruption to its operations and 
revenue streams as well as financial 
position due to the impact of 
climate change and the transition 
to a greener economy, requiring a 
major pivot with respect to its core 
products or services.
34	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Climate scenarios
Risk description
Orderly 
Transition
Disorderly 
Transition
Hot House 
World
Mitigation measures
Portfolio: Risk of product failure due to 
extreme weather conditions driven by 
climate change for companies with 
products operating in harsh environments 
exposed to extreme weather conditions.
TCFD Risk category: Acute Risk and Chronic 
Risk (Physical Risks)
Review product design and testing with 
portfolio companies that may be exposed 
to this risk.
Portfolio: Reputational risks associated 
with the decommissioning, recycling 
and non-recyclable waste associated 
with renewable energy products and/or 
energy storage systems e.g. fuel cells and 
batteries. 
TCFD Risk category: Policy and Legal Risks, 
Reputational Risks (Transition Risks)
Support portfolio companies to develop 
business models and strategies that 
reduce waste and encourage re-use and 
facilitate recycling.
Portfolio: Risks to product deployment 
where companies are exposed to 
harsh weather conditions that may be 
exacerbated by climate change.
TCFD Risk category: Acute Risk and Chronic 
Risk (Physical Risks)
Support portfolio companies where this risk 
may apply to factor climate conditions into 
product design and testing.
Portfolio risk summary
Following the 2024 testing we have adjusted our portfolio 
company risk summary table as follows. The overall number 
and distribution of material companies in the portfolio has 
changed due to the sale of the Deeptech Garrison and 
Featurespace companies during the year and changes to the 
valuations of some of our other Deeptech and Life Sciences 
portfolio companies. These portfolio changes did not have a 
material impact on our overall key risk profile as set out in the 
2023 Annual Report.
Investment theme
Sum of total 
risks
Number of 
companies 
Average 
risk
Cleantech
82
5
16.4
Life Sciences
128
8
16
Deeptech
–
No material 
companies
–
No company in our analysis breaches the high-risk threshold 
across both the physical and transition risk assessments and 
over the various scenarios that were used. 
KEY
LOW
Low impact to overall business 
model/operations and revenue 
streams. There is minimal, if any 
impact to the operations/revenue 
streams and/financial position, of 
the company. 
MEDIUM
Medium impact to business model/
operations and revenue streams. 
There could be some disruption, 
but the business is able to adapt/
mitigate and continue operations. 
The core service/product offering 
and/or financial position, is not 
impacted.
HIGH
There could be a major impact to 
either the operational capability 
and/or products and services. 
The company suffers severe 
disruption to its operations and 
revenue streams as well as financial 
position due to the impact of 
climate change and the transition 
to a greener economy, requiring a 
major pivot with respect to its core 
products or services.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
35
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Categorising our opportunities
Climate-related R&D and innovation, expansion of low emission goods and services across the portfolio, and 
successful investment in new technologies were identified as the most material opportunities for IP Group based 
on the size of the opportunity and the ability to execute it. These opportunities fell into the following categories (see 
more detail on 2023 Annual Report page 55).
Opportunity context
TCFD categories
Low carbon 
energy 
generation
We expect to see a continuing increase in demand for low carbon energy 
generation, such as fusion energy, as the world transitions to zero carbon. 
We also expect to see significant demand for small-scale, localised wind 
energy generation.
Portfolio companies in this category: First Light Fusion, Hysata, OxCCU
•	
Products and 
services
•	
Markets
•	
Energy source
Energy use 
reduction
In addition to a different energy paradigm, there will also be a drive for 
reduction and efficiency in energy usage. This will be from both a retail 
perspective as homeowners seek to lower their energy costs and reduce 
emissions, as well as in industrial applications and the transport sector.
Portfolio companies in this category: Helio Display Materials, Mixergy
•	
Products and 
services
•	
Markets
•	
Resource 
efficiency
Energy 
storage
There will be growing need for storing various forms of renewable energy 
from solar, wind and hydrogen. We see a significant opportunity as demand 
for fuel cell technology grows and we expect the demand for low cost 
and long duration fuel cell storage will grow significantly as the world 
decarbonises and electric vehicles proliferate.
Portfolio companies in this category: RFC Power, Bramble Energy
•	
Products and 
services
•	
Markets
•	
Resource 
efficiency
Carbon 
capture 
and water 
availability
There will be increasing demand for emissions reduction technologies 
including carbon capture and growing demand for technologies that help 
in the conservation, cleaning and filtering of water. 
Portfolio companies in this category: Alithic, ElectraLith 
•	
Products and 
services
•	
Markets
•	
Resource 
efficiency
Integrating climate risks and opportunities into businesses,  
strategy and financial planning
We have established two key strands to integrate climate risks and opportunities into business strategy and 
financial planning:
•	
Reduce and mitigate climate risk by integrating assessment findings into our Group risk management process. 
See our risk management process on page 38.
•	
Capitalise on climate opportunities by leveraging our insight, relationships, capital and expertise to continue to 
build our Cleantech portfolio. 
Metrics and Targets
Our finance team monitors the number of Cleantech 
investments in our portfolio and overall portfolio balance 
between Cleantech and other investments.
In terms of business operations, we aim to become a 
Net Zero company by 2030, based on the emissions we 
are able to measure:
•	
Scope 1: We do not have Scope 1 emissions
•	
Scope 2: We measure and disclose Scope 2 for our 
operational boundary
•	
Scope 3: We measure and disclose business travel 
and commuting as part of Scope 3. For Scope 3, the 
Group does not currently collate data on financed 
emissions, but we are working towards doing so in 
future.
As our overall emissions are very low, an intensity ratio 
allows us to better gauge our energy efficiency and 
overall strategy to increase energy efficiency, as well as 
make cross-industry comparisons. We use the following 
intensity metrics: 
•	
tCO2e/FTE (full time equivalent employee)
•	
tCO2e/m2 (of office space)
See page 31 for our energy and emissions disclosures.
36	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

IP Group considers climate-related risk to be financially immaterial in the context  
of the Company’s overall financial statements.
IP Group has complied with the requirements of UK LR 6.6.6R (9)and the Companies Act Section 414CA by including climate-related financial disclosures 
consistent with the TCFD recommendations and recommended disclosures. We have considered Section C Guidance for All Sectors, and Section E of the 
TCFD Annex entitled ‘Supplemental Guidance for Non-Financial Groups’ in developing this disclosure. The table below describes our compliance with each 
area of the disclosure and where this information can be found in this Annual Report and in our 2023 Annual Report disclosure.
Section
Recommendation
2024 
disclosure 
level
Reference
Governance 
Disclose the organisation’s 
governance around climate-related 
risks and opportunities.
a.	 Describe the Board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. 
Page 32
b.	 Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related 
risks and opportunities. 
Page 32
Strategy 
Disclose the actual and potential 
impacts of climate-related risks and 
opportunities on the organisation’s 
businesses, strategy and financial 
planning where such information is 
material.
a.	 Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has 
identified over the short, medium and long term.
Pages 34 to 36 
and 2023 Annual 
Report page 50 
b.	 Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the 
organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning.
Page 33
c.	 Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy. Taking into 
consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower 
scenario.
Page 33 and 
2023 Annual 
Report page 50
Risk Management  
Disclose how the organisation 
identifies, assesses and manages 
climate-related risks.
a.	 Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing 
climate-related risks.
Page 33
b.	 Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks. 
Pages 33 to 35 
c.	 Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-
related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management.
Page 32
Metrics and Targets 
Disclose the metrics and targets 
used to assess and manage 
relevant climate-related risks and 
opportunities where the information is 
material.
a.	 Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate related 
risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management 
processes.
Page 36
b.	 Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2 and, if appropriate, Scope 3 GHG emissions, and 
the related risks.
Page 31
c.	 Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related 
risks and opportunities, and performance against targets.
Page 36
DISCLOSURE 
LEVEL KEY
  Full	
  Partial	
  Omitted
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
37
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
OUR GOVERNANCE
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Managing risk: our framework  
for balancing risk and reward
Governance
Overall responsibility for the risk framework and 
definition of risk appetite rests with the Board who, 
through regular review of risks, ensure that risk exposure 
is balanced with an ability to achieve the Group’s 
strategic objectives. The IP Group Risk Council is the 
Executive body that operates to establish, recommend 
and maintain an appropriate risk management 
framework for the Group and to oversee the effective 
application of the framework across the business. The 
Risk Council is chaired by the CFOO, its members include 
the Company Secretary and Finance Director, and it 
has representation from operational business units as 
required during the year. Risk identification is carried 
out through a bottom-up process via operational 
risk registers maintained by individual teams, which 
are updated and reported to the Risk Council at least 
annually. There is additional top-down input from 
Executive Management, with a Non-executive review 
carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee at least 
annually.
Risk management process
Ranking of the Group’s risks is carried out by combining 
a scoring of their impact and likelihood. Operational risks 
are aggregated into strategic risks, which identifies key 
themes, and ultimately informs our principal risks, which 
are described in the Principal risks and uncertainties 
section of this report. The operations of the Group, and 
the implementation of its objectives and strategy, are 
subject to a number of principal risks and uncertainties. 
Were more than one of the risks to occur together, the 
overall impact on the Group may be compounded.
The design and ongoing effectiveness of the key controls 
over the Group’s principal risks are documented using a 
“risk and control matrix”, which includes an assessment 
of the design and operating effectiveness of the controls 
in question. The key controls over the Group’s identified 
principal risks are reviewed as part of the Group’s risk 
management process, by management, the Audit 
and Risk Committee and the Board during the year. 
However, the Group’s risk management programme can 
only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that 
principal risks are managed to an acceptable level.
Risk management activity in 2024 included updating 
the Group’s existing operational, strategic and principal 
risk registers; updating and testing the key controls over 
principal risks and conducting an assessment of the 
strategic risks; and the appropriateness of our principal 
risks and discussion of emerging risks via a Board 
risk workshop.
Risk Council activity
During 2024, the Risk Council continued to oversee 
the Group’s existing risk management framework, 
enhancing risk management and internal 
control processes and, in doing so, supported the 
Board in exercising its responsibility surrounding 
risk management. 
During the year, one area of focus for the Risk Council 
was developing an implementation plan for the 
revised UK Corporate Governance Code, released 
in January 2024, which confirmed changes to UK 
companies’ requirements in respect of the review and 
reporting requirements for material controls “Provision 
29 requirements”, which will apply to financial years 
beginning on or after 1 January 2026. This included 
workshop sessions facilitated by PwC to agree a controls 
governance framework and identification of a sub-set 
of the Group’s risks which would be considered to be 
material. In 2025 we will move forward with identifying 
a corresponding set of material controls whose 
operation will form the basis of the Group’s Provision 29 
requirements.
Other areas of focus for the Risk Council during the 
year included:
•	
Review of consolidated operational risk registers 
following bi-annual updates
•	
Monitoring the completion status of remediation 
points raised by our internal audit process
•	
Review of the results of an annual testing of the 
Group’s key controls performed by PwC’s internal 
audit team
•	
Oversight of plans to wind-up our Hong Kong 
operations following the decision not to proceed with 
a fund in this geography
•	
Review of materials used for a Board risk workshop 
•	
Monitoring of the Group’s key risk indicators
•	
Other procedural matters including overview of the 
completion status of e-learning programmes, review 
of the Group’s conflicts policy and review of gifts and 
hospitality as part of our anti-bribery controls
The Risk Council was supported during the year by 
PwC’s Internal Audit team which conducted testing 
work over the operating effectiveness of the Group’s 
key controls over its principal risks and advised on the 
implementation of the UK Corporate Governance Code 
2024 Provision 29 requirements as set out above.
38	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
RISK MANAGEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Oversight and challenge by the  
Risk Council, central functions  
and management
Independent assurance
Board
Risk Council
Collated risk 
registers
Executive 
Management
HR
Finance
IT
Legal, Cosec & ESG
Communications & 
Investor Relations
Australia
Parkwalk
Audit and Risk Committee
Frontline operations
Output of internal audit  
resource utilised
Consolidation, analysis, reporting, oversight
Challenge, feedback, learning
Direct reporting
Review and challenge
First line of defence
Third line of defence
Second line of defence
Central functions
01
02
03
IP Capital
UK investment 
partnership
Life Sciences
Technology
Cleantech
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
39
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
RISK MANAGEMENT.
IP GROUP RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Principal and emerging risks
A summary of the principal risks affecting the Group 
and the steps taken to manage these is set out in this 
section. Further discussion of the Group’s approach to 
principal risks and uncertainties is given on page 70 of 
the Corporate Governance Statement and page 104 
of the Audit and Risk Committee Report, while further 
disclosure of the Group’s financial risk management 
is set out in note 3 to the consolidated financial 
statements. Following the 2024 annual review process, 
the heatmap below describes the relative potential risks 
posed by each of the Group’s identified principal risks 
ranked in terms of relative impact and relative likelihood.
Risk appetite
The Group accepts that certain risks are inherent in 
achieving its strategic aims, which are set out in the 
Strategy section of the report on page 15. The Group 
accepts risk provided it is consistent with the Group’s 
purpose and strategy, and where it can be effectively 
managed and offers an appropriate trade-off between 
risk and reward. The Board has determined its risk 
appetite in relation to each of its principal risks and 
considered appropriate metrics to monitor performance 
relative to defined thresholds. 
Emerging risks
The Group manages its emerging risks through a 
process of risk identification, including regular updates 
to the Group’s operational risk registers and horizon 
scanning, combined with risk severity scoring. Emerging 
risk themes considered by the Group in 2024 included 
technological risks such as misinformation and 
disinformation, adverse outcomes of AI technologies 
and cyber insecurity as well as environmental, 
geopolitical, societal and economic risks. The board 
considered that economic risks posed the greatest risk 
to the Group in the longer-term and that there was 
an opportunity for the Group’s portfolio companies to 
create solutions or alternatives to address emerging 
environmental risks.
Principal risks:
1
Insufficient capital: plc
2
Insufficient capital: portfolio
3
Insufficient returns
4
People
5
Macroeconomic environment
6
Legislation/regulation
7
Cyber and IT security
8
Operations including international operations
2023 principal risk scoring
Principal risk heatmap
Impact
 Likelihood
2
1
5
3
6
8
4
7
40	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
RISK MANAGEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

01
The Group may have insufficient 
capital to deliver its investment 
strategy
The Group’s business model relies on the recycling of capital for re-investment from realisations, 
with a proportion of realisations also being allocated to shareholder returns. In the longer term, 
other sources including debt and equity issues may be used to manage the Group’s capital 
position. The ability of the Group to deliver realisations and raise additional funding is influenced 
by macroeconomic and capital market conditions.
Link to strategy
 
Access to sufficient capital allows the Group to 
deliver its investment strategy thereby delivering 
attractive financial returns
Actions taken by management
•	
The Group has significant balance sheet capital and managed funds capital 
to deploy in portfolio opportunities
•	
The Group regularly forecasts cash requirements of the portfolio to ensure 
that the Group’s investment plans reflect currently available capital and 
expected realisations
•	
The Group ensures that sufficient cash is available to maintain headroom 
over debt covenants and regulatory capital requirements
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
The Group may not be able to provide the 
necessary capital to key assets, which may 
affect the portfolio companies’ performance or 
dilute future returns of the Group
•	
The Group may not be able to realise capital 
from its portfolio to fund the desired level of 
investment activity in the portfolio
Development during the year
•	
Cash proceeds totalled £183.4m in 2024
•	
The Group raised £95m of third party-funds during 2024
•	
The Group continued its investor outreach exercise with the goal of raising a 
UK scale-up fund 
•	
We continue to maintain a close dialogue with the Group’s equity and debt 
investors
•	
The Group’s share price continued to trade below NAV during the year
•	
The quoted portfolio value saw a fair value reduction of £51.6m in the year
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
41
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

02
It may be difficult for the Group’s 
portfolio companies to attract 
sufficient capital
Many of the Group’s portfolio companies are in their development or growth phases and will fund 
their growth through raising additional capital from IP Group and other co-investors. The ability 
of portfolio companies to attract further capital is influenced by their financial and operational 
performance and the general economic climate and trading conditions, particularly in the UK.
Link to strategy
 
Access to sufficient levels of capital allows 
the Group’s portfolio companies to invest in 
technology and commercial opportunities to 
ensure future financial returns.
Actions taken by management
•	
The Group maintains Board representation on the majority of its portfolio 
companies and monitors their funding position and plans
•	
The Group regularly forecasts cash requirements of the portfolio and tracks 
those with a heightened funding risk
•	
The Group operates a corporate finance function, which is experienced in 
carrying out fundraising mandates for portfolio companies
•	
The Group maintains close relationships with a wide variety of co-investors 
that focus on companies at differing stages of development
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
Portfolio companies may not be able to close 
investment rounds, reducing their ability 
to scale quickly and in extremis leading to 
company failure
•	
Reduced investor appetite may lead to lower 
valuation funding rounds, resulting in an 
unrealised fair value loss in the value of the 
Group’s holding
•	
Lack of investor appetite for IPOs may mean 
that this is not a viable funding option 
for portfolio companies in the short to 
medium term
Development during the year
•	
The Group’s portfolio raised £785m in 2024, with £63m (c. 8%) of this funding 
being provided by IP Group
•	
IP Capital worked on 5 corporate finance engagements during the year
•	
Excluding the Oxford Nanopore holding, the Group held board seats on 77.4% 
of portfolio companies valued at greater than £5m by value 
•	
Our third-party funds had capital to deploy of £119.1m at year end
•	
 IP Group hosted a flagship investor event which showcased a number of the 
Group’s portfolio companies to existing and new investors
•	
We continued international investor roadshows in the year in the US, UK, EU 
and Middle East
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
42	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

03
The returns generated by 
the Group’s portfolio may be 
insufficient 
The Group’s portfolio of science-based businesses has the potential to deliver outsize returns, 
however they are by their nature riskier than more stable, lower-yielding asset classes or 
companies. The Group may not realise a sufficient return on its invested capital at an individual 
company or overall portfolio level. 
Link to strategy
 
Insufficient investment returns reduce the Group’s 
ability to deliver attractive returns to shareholders 
and may also limit the Group’s ability to raise 
additional capital.
Actions taken by management
•	
The Group’s employees have significant experience in sourcing, developing 
and growing early-stage technology companies to significant value
•	
There is a rigorous process for the approval of investments and divestments 
within a delegated authority framework
•	
Members of the Group’s investment teams typically serve as Non-executive 
Directors to portfolio companies to help identify and remedy critical issues 
•	
The Group has portfolio company holdings across different sectors to 
reduce the impact of a single company failure or sector decline
•	
The Group employs a capital efficient process deploying low levels of initial 
capital to enable identification and mitigation of potential failures at the 
earliest possible stage
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
Portfolio company failure directly impacts the 
Group’s value and profitability
•	
Concentration of value within a small numbers 
of companies could exacerbate the impact 
of any impairment or failure of one or more of 
these companies
•	
The value of the Group’s drug discovery and 
development portfolio companies may be 
significantly impacted by a negative clinical 
trial result
Development during the year
•	
We completed five new balance sheet investments during the year, and a 
further 13 within Parkwalk
•	
Excluding the Oxford Nanopore holding, the Group held board seats on 77.4% 
of portfolio companies valued at greater than £5m by value
•	
Balance sheet investment decision-making was consolidated within a single 
Investment Committee during the year, which we believe will aid investment 
decision-making compared with previous sector-specific Investment 
Committees
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
43
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

04
The Group may lose key personnel 
or fail to attract and integrate new 
personnel
The industry in which the Group operates is a specialised area and the Group requires highly 
qualified and experienced employees. There is a risk that the Group’s employees could be hired by 
competitors or other technology-based companies and organisations or could otherwise choose 
to leave the Group. 
Link to strategy
 
 
The Group’s strategic objective to develop and 
scale a portfolio of compelling science-based 
businesses capable of delivering attractive 
financial returns on our assets, is dependent on 
the Group’s employees who work with the portfolio 
companies and those who support them.
Actions taken by management
•	
Detailed succession plan in place for all senior employees and other 
selected key-person dependencies
•	
Regular compensation benchmarking carried out for all employees
•	
Maintenance of a balanced incentive package comprising a mix of salary, 
benefits, performance-based long-term incentives, and benefits such as 
flexible working and salary sacrifice arrangements
•	
The Group encourages employee development and progression through 
targeted learning and development activity, coaching and mentoring and 
supports this through the annual appraisal process
•	
The Group promotes an open culture of communication and provides an 
inspiring and challenging workplace where people are given autonomy to 
do their jobs. The Group is fully supportive of flexible working, empowering 
employees to work where and how works best to deliver against the 
requirements of their role
•	
An employee forum, “IP Connect” with an appointed designated Non-
executive Director to facilitate dialogue with the Board in both directions. 
Part of IP Connect’s remit is also to support the evolution of the culture and 
continuous improvement of working life at the Group
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
Loss of key executives and employees of the 
Group or an inability to attract, retain and 
integrate appropriately skilled and experienced 
employees could have an adverse effect on 
the Group’s competitive advantage, business, 
financial condition, operational results and future 
prospects.
Development during the year
•	
Continued excellent employee engagement scores obtained in the year 
from employee engagement surveys, with eNPS marginally improving in the 
year to +31 (2023: +27) which is within the “very high” category
•	
Continued high frequency of employee communications from Executive 
Directors and the Head of HR via regular virtual and in-person all-staff 
meetings
•	
Reduction in the overall number of employees as part of the cost-
reduction exercise allows increased focus on the needs, desires and future 
development of individual employees, as well as creating short-term 
development opportunities within the new structure
•	
Approximately 64% of employees in place at 31 December 2024 have been 
with the Company for at least five years
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
44	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

05
Macroeconomic conditions may 
negatively impact the Group’s 
ability to achieve its strategic 
objectives 
Adverse macroeconomic conditions including volatility in interest rates and inflation could reduce 
appetite for investment within the sectors in which we operate. Geopolitical uncertainty including 
global conflicts may impact the cost of raw materials; changes to the labour market regulations 
may reduce the availability of highly skilled staff within the Group’s portfolio; and protectionist 
policies may reduce trade and cross-border investment.
Link to strategy
The Group’s strategic objective to develop a 
portfolio of commercially successful portfolio 
companies and deliver attractive financial 
returns on our assets and third-party funds 
can be materially impacted by the current 
macroeconomic environment.
Actions taken by management
•	
Senior management receive regular capital market and economic updates 
from the Group’s capital markets team and its brokers
•	
Regular capital allocation process and ongoing monitoring against 
agreed budget
•	
Regular oversight of upcoming capital requirements of portfolio from both 
the Group and third parties
•	
The Group’s Risk Council monitors key macroeconomic trends that may 
impact the Group
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
The success of those portfolio companies 
that require significant external funding 
may be influenced by the market’s appetite 
for investment in early-stage and growth 
companies
•	
Of the Group’s portfolio value, 17.7% is held in 
companies quoted on public markets and 
therefore subject to market price volatility
Development during the year
•	
Macroeconomic conditions improved in the year, as inflation continued to 
moderate in G8 countries, resulting in central banks starting to enact interest 
rate cuts. Annual UK CPI inflation fell from 7.3% in 2023 to 2.5% in 2025 and the 
UK base rate reduced from 5.25% at the start of the year to 4.75% at year end
•	
There remains significant uncertainty around whether inflation will persist in 
2025 and result in a slower pace of central bank interest rate cuts
•	
Geopolitical risks including conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East 
continued, with increased trade protectionism also emerging as a theme 
during the year
•	
The Group has maintained significant cash reserves available for investment 
and as such is well placed to respond to macroeconomic uncertainty
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
45
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

06
There may be changes to, impacts 
from, or failure to comply with, 
legislation, government policy 
and regulation
There may be negative impacts from changes in government policy, regulation or legislation and 
taxation. The Group may fail to comply with legislation and regulation, leading to financial and 
reputational damage.
Link to strategy
The Group’s strategic objectives of creating 
and maintaining a portfolio of compelling 
opportunities to deliver attractive returns for 
shareholders could be materially impacted by 
failure to comply with, or adequately plan for, 
a change in legislation, government policy or 
regulation.
Actions taken by management
•	
The Group utilises professional advisors as appropriate to support its 
monitoring of, and response to changes in, tax, insurance or other legislation
•	
The Group delivers regular training in areas including bribery and anti-
money laundering and regulatory compliance
•	
The Group has internal policies and procedures to ensure its compliance 
with applicable regulations
•	
The Group maintains Directors and officers (“D&O”) and professional 
indemnity insurance policies
•	
The Group responds to public consultations and is in dialogue with the UK 
Government in policy areas such as the Enterprise Investment Scheme
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
Changes to tax legislation or the nature of the 
Group’s activities, in particular in relation to 
the Substantial Shareholder Exemption, may 
adversely affect the Group’s tax position and 
accordingly its value and operations
•	
Regulatory changes or breaches could 
ultimately lead to withdrawal of regulatory 
permissions for the Group’s authorised 
subsidiaries, resulting in loss of fund 
management contracts, reputational damage 
or fines
Development during the year
•	
Ongoing focus on regulatory compliance, including third-party reviews and 
utilisation of specialist advisors
•	
The Group submitted a cessation notice for its Hong Kong licenses during 
the year as a result of the decision not to pursue fund operations in that 
geography
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
46	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

07
The Group and its portfolio 
companies may be subjected to 
cyber attacks
A significant cyber/information security breach either within the Group or one of its portfolio 
companies could result in financial and reputational damage, business disruption and the loss of 
commercially sensitive information. 
Link to strategy
The Group’s strategic objectives of creating 
and maintaining a portfolio of compelling 
opportunities to deliver attractive returns for 
shareholders could be materially impacted by a 
serious cyber security breach at a corporate or 
portfolio company level.
Actions taken by management
•	
The Group reviews its data and cyber security processes with its external 
outsourced IT providers and applies the UK Government’s “ten steps” 
framework or other national equivalents where relevant
•	
Regular IT management reporting framework in place
•	
Internal and third-party reviews of policies and procedures to ensure 
appropriate framework in place to safeguard data
•	
Assessment of third-party suppliers of cloud-based and on-premises 
systems in use 
•	
Annual Cyber and IT training is supplemented by regular bite-sized and 
interactive cyber security training 
•	
Network and infrastructure security systems to respond to emerging threats
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
The Group, or one, or a combination of, its 
portfolio companies could face significant 
fines from a data security breach
•	
The Group or one of its portfolio companies 
could be subjected to a phishing attack, 
which could lead to invalid payments being 
authorised or a sensitive information leak
•	
A malware or ransomware attack could lead 
to systems becoming non-functioning and 
impair the ability of the business to operate in 
the short term
Development during the year
•	
Ongoing focus on IT security and staff training
•	
Continued programme of phishing and penetration testing
•	
Implementation of additional cyber security systems to provide enhanced 
threat detection
•	
Onboarded strategic level legal and external communications resource to 
supplement response resources to a serious cyber incident 
•	
A cyber attack simulation was undertaken in the year to rehearse the 
response to a serious cyber incident. The exercise revealed several strengths 
in IP Group plc’s cybersecurity posture and incident response capabilities. 
The organisation demonstrated robust technical protections. Incident 
Management Teams (IMT), including Silver IMT, were activated promptly, 
and communication plans were well-executed. The legal team provided 
critical guidance on ransom payment decisions and regulatory reporting. 
The organisation also showed a proactive approach in reviewing access 
controls for all portfolio companies
•	
Review of key controls by the Group’s internal auditors
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
47
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

08
The Group may be negatively 
impacted by operational 
issues both from a UK central 
and international operations 
perspective
The potential exists for a negative impact to the Group arising from operational issues such as 
business continuity; and from the non-compliance of overseas operations with local laws and 
regulations; failure to integrate overseas operations with the Group; and an inability to foresee 
territory-specific risks and macro-events. The Group may also fail to establish effective control 
mechanisms, considering different working cultures and environments, leading to significant 
senior management time requirement, distracting from core day-to-day business.
Link to strategy
 
The Group’s strategy includes building a portfolio 
of compelling intellectual property-based 
companies across the UK and Australia and New 
Zealand. The scale of the Group’s operations, 
including internationally, represents increased 
importance of successful execution of its 
operations.
Actions taken by management
•	
Local legal and regulatory advisors have been engaged in the 
establishment phase of overseas operations. International teams typically 
have their own in-house legal teams and regularly report to the UK-based 
General Counsel
•	
Business continuity plans are in place for the Group and tested regularly
•	
Our executive recruitment function and HR are involved in senior hires for 
new territories. Senior international personnel include current and former UK 
employees, encouraging a shared culture across territories
•	
The risk management framework in place across each business unit has 
been established in each international territory and is integrated into the 
Group’s regular risk management processes and reporting
•	
Third-party suppliers are used for international accounting and payroll 
services to reduce the risk of fraud within smaller teams
Risk appetite
Examples of risk
•	
A legal or regulatory breach could ultimately 
lead to the withdrawal of regulatory 
permissions overseas, resulting in loss of trust, 
management contracts, reputational damage 
and fines
•	
Divergent Group cultures may lead 
to difficulties in achieving the Group’s 
strategic aims
•	
Senior management may spend a significant 
amount of time overseeing non-UK territories, 
which could detract from central Group 
strategy and operations
Development during the year
•	
Continued coordination of risk reporting across Australia, New Zealand and 
Hong Kong
•	
Decision taken to discontinue Hong Kong operations
•	
Reviewed disaster recovery plans in the year
Change 
from 2023
KEY
STRATEGIC PILLARS
Have an impact 
on the world 
that counts
Develop our 
unique insight, 
expertise 
and access
Accelerate value 
creation
Build a truly 
differentiated 
reputation
Be a home for 
exceptional talent
CHANGE 
FROM 2023
Increase
Decrease
No change
RISK APPETITE
Very low
Low
Balanced
High
Very high
48	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
RISK MANAGEMENT.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

The Directors have carried out a robust assessment 
of the viability of the Group over a three-year period 
to December 2027, considering its strategy, its current 
financial position, its principal risks and its emerging 
risks. The three-year period reflects the time horizon 
reviewed by the Board, and over which the Group 
places a higher degree of reliance over the forecasting 
assumptions used.
The strategy and associated principal risks underpin 
the Group’s three-year financial plan and scenario 
testing, which the Directors review and approve at 
least annually. As a business which seeks to accelerate 
the impact of science for a better future through our 
portfolio companies, our business model seeks to 
balance cash investments, the generation of portfolio 
returns and portfolio realisations. The three-year plan is 
built using a bottom-up model using assumptions for: 
•	
the level of portfolio investment
•	
the level of realisations from the portfolio (net of 
carried interest payments) 
•	
the financial performance (and valuation) of the 
underlying portfolio companies 
•	
the Group’s drawdown and repayment of its debt
•	
the Group’s ability to raise further capital
•	
the level of the Group’s net overheads and
•	
the level of dividends and share buybacks
Of the Group’s principal risks, those relating to 
insufficient capital (both Group and portfolio 
companies), insufficient investment returns, and 
macroeconomic conditions are deemed to be the most 
relevant to the Group’s viability assessment, due to their 
potential to impact the Group’s liquidity position and 
net asset position, both of which directly impact the 
level of headroom over the Group’s debt covenants. 
Other principal risks including personnel risk; legislation, 
governance and regulation; cyber and IT; and 
international operations could all have an impact on the 
Group’s performance but are less likely to have a direct 
impact on viability within the assessment period.
To assess the impact of the principal risks highlighted 
above on the prospects of the Group, the financial 
plan is stress-tested by modelling severe, but plausible, 
and intermediate downside scenarios, where adverse 
impacts across the Group’s principal risks relating to 
insufficient capital, insufficient investment returns, and 
macroeconomic conditions were considered as part of 
the review. Under the severe downside scenario, a 70% 
reduction in planned realisations and a 35% decline in 
portfolio fair values which were considered together 
with a series of mitigating actions, including reducing 
planned levels of investment. 
Under these stress-testing scenarios, significant 
reductions to portfolio investments are made to 
preserve the Group’s remaining cash balances. In 
all scenarios modelled, the Group remains solvent 
throughout the three-year period with no breach of debt 
covenants or a “cash trap period” occurring. See note 19 
for further details on cash trap arrangements.
Based on this assessment, the Directors have a 
reasonable expectation that the Group will continue to 
operate and meets its liabilities, as they fall due, up to 
December 2027.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
49
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
VIABILITY STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Shareholders 
Employees 
Portfolio 
companies
Universities,
academics
and research
institutions
Environment
and wider
community
Debt 
holders
Inventors,
founders and 
entrepreneurs
Regulators
Brokers and
advisors
Governance
bodies including 
proxy advisors 
Third-party 
fund investors 
and portfolio 
co-investors
Statement by the Directors in 
performance of their duties 
in accordance with s172(1) 
Companies Act 2006 
The Directors of IP Group plc consider that they have 
acted both individually and together as a Board in the 
way that would be most likely to promote the success of 
the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole. 
This statement describes how the Board has had regard 
to the matters set out in s172(1) (a) to (f) Companies Act 
2006 (“s172”) when performing its duties for the year ended 
31 December 2024.
Engaging with stakeholders
Engaging and maintaining open channels of 
communication with the Group’s stakeholders is an 
integral part of its business and critical to ensuring the 
future success of the business. The Group engages with its 
stakeholders in many forms, which allows for flexibility in 
the methods of engagement and enables the Company 
to facilitate constructive two-way engagement with its 
multiple stakeholders. 
The following table sets out how the Group actively engages 
with its key stakeholders in a way that enables the Group’s 
senior executives and Board members to understand 
the potential impact of decisions and actions on those 
stakeholders. And, further, so that the Group can be 
responsive to matters raised by key stakeholders and feed 
back to them how their views have been taken into account.
50	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT

Name of 
stakeholder 
and relevant 
application of S.172
Why we engage
Engagement methods – who and how
 Impact of engagement
 
Shareholders
s172(1)
A  E  F
To ensure that: 
•	
shareholders have a 
good understanding 
of and confidence in 
the Group’s strategy, 
performance, purpose 
and culture and that the 
Group’s strategy remains 
focused on delivering 
returns to shareholders
•	
the Group fosters and 
maintains open and 
constructive relationships 
with its shareholders 
•	
the Board understands 
the issues that are 
important to its 
shareholders
•	
the Board acts fairly 
between shareholders of 
the Company
•	
Direct meetings/calls with individual shareholders, 
primarily with the Chair, Senior Independent 
Director, Executive Directors and senior 
management
•	
Direct shareholder access to the Chair, Senior 
Independent Director and Board Committee 
Chairs relating to matters within the relevant 
Committee’s mandate 
•	
Results announcements, investor roadshows and 
presentations in person and broadcast via the 
“Investormeetcompany” platform to enable broad 
audience engagement and real-time Q&A 
•	
Group capital market and sector showcase events 
which in 2024 included the annual Group Flagship 
Event at the Royal Society of Chemistry 
•	
Broker-facilitated investor forums/conferences
•	
The Group’s website, with investors being able to 
sign up to regulatory and portfolio company alerts
•	
Meetings with analysts and feedback from the 
Group’s brokers
•	
Annual General Meeting (“AGM”), with the 2024 
AGM streamed live on the “Investormeetcompany” 
platform. Shareholders were also able to submit 
questions in advance of the 2024 AGM
•	
Annual Report and Accounts
•	
RNS and RNS Reach announcements
•	
Shareholder circulars
•	
Dedicated IR and company secretarial mailboxes 
(IR@ipgroupplc.com and CoSec@ipgroupplc.com) 
•	
Closer and more direct links between 
shareholders and the Board, which 
has enabled the Board to gain a 
better understanding of shareholder 
expectations on the matters which 
have been most important to them 
in 2024; including strategy, financial 
performance, board composition, 
operating costs, capital allocation 
and share price/discount to NAV 
•	
Enabled broader audience 
engagement and the ability to 
engage in a real-time Q&A with 
shareholders on a number of 
occasions through the year
•	
Shareholder views communicated 
during results roadshows/AGM Q&A 
as well as in-person meetings with 
defined agenda items between 
roadshows, have been specifically 
taken into account in the following 
Board decisions:
i.	
to continue and increase the Share 
Buyback programme on multiple 
occasions following a number of 
realisations through 2024, as detailed 
on page 12; 
ii.	
to cancel all of the shares held in 
treasury (as further detailed on 
page 25);
iii.	 on the internal reorganisation 
exercise undertaken in H2 to improve 
efficiency and reduce the ongoing 
cost base of the Group, as detailed 
on page 12; and 
iv.	 on strategy regarding access to 
third-party capital, as detailed on 
page 11. 
KEY
S.172(1) FACTORS
A
the likely 
consequences of 
any decision in the 
long term
B
the interests of 
the Company’s 
employees
C
the need to foster 
the Company’s 
business 
relationships 
with suppliers, 
customers 
and others
D
the impact of 
the Company’s 
operations on the 
community and 
the environment
E
the desirability 
of the Company 
maintaining a 
reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct
F
the need to act 
fairly between 
members of the 
Company
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
51
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Name of 
stakeholder 
and relevant 
application of S.172
Why we engage
Engagement methods – who and how
 Impact of engagement
 
Employees
s172(1)
A  B  E
To be an attractive home 
for exceptional talent, which 
is critical to achieving the 
Group’s strategy and vision. 
Meaningful engagement 
with employees also helps 
to foster a strong and 
supportive culture.
•	
IP Connect employee workforce forum, which 
was consulted on matters such as Executive 
remuneration and the reorganisation process 
undertaken in H2 2024
•	
Designated Non-executive Director for employees 
who, amongst other things and alongside the 
Group People Director, attends all IP Connect 
meetings 
•	
Regular all-staff meetings in person and via video 
conference, with questions encouraged
•	
Annual all staff interactive Q&A session with the 
Non-executives
•	
Annual all-staff events and regular staff 
social events
•	
Weekly all-staff emails from the CEO
•	
Staff intranet
•	
Global third-party-hosted anonymous “speaking 
up” hotline and web reporting tool
•	
Regular anonymised engagement surveys 
throughout the year
•	
Internal training sessions
•	
Women’s Networking Group and associated 
events and initiatives/development sessions 
•	
Inclusion and Diversity Project including launch of 
internal reverse mentoring scheme 
•	
Assisted the Board in understanding 
employee sentiment following the 
reorganisation. This in turn helped 
to frame communications, the 
balance of focus on exiting/retained 
employees and the appropriate 
management of key-person 
dependencies in the new structure
•	
90% of employees believe our culture 
is one in which diversity and diverse 
perspectives are valued, up from 
66% before the Group started our 
Inclusion and Diversity Project
•	
IP Connect played an integral role 
in the formulation and articulation 
of the Group’s new values launched 
in 2024
KEY
S.172(1) FACTORS
A
the likely 
consequences of 
any decision in the 
long term
B
the interests of 
the Company’s 
employees
C
the need to foster 
the Company’s 
business 
relationships 
with suppliers, 
customers 
and others
D
the impact of 
the Company’s 
operations on the 
community and 
the environment
E
the desirability 
of the Company 
maintaining a 
reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct
F
the need to act 
fairly between 
members of the 
Company
52	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Name of 
stakeholder 
and relevant 
application of S.172
Why we engage
Engagement methods – who and how
 Impact of engagement
Portfolio 
companies
s172(1)
A  C  E
To identify, back and grow 
science-based opportunities 
into a diversified portfolio of 
transformative businesses, 
which address some of 
the world’s most pressing 
challenges. 
Part of the Group’s purpose 
is to build businesses that 
have a positive social and 
environmental impact, and 
this forms an element of 
the Board’s consideration of 
the long-term impact of its 
decisions.
•	
Hands-on approach via portfolio company boards 
as investor directors/observers
•	
Offering fundraising and capital markets expertise 
via IP Capital (the Group’s fund management and 
corporate advisory business), and commercial 
advice and support on IP strategy and due 
diligence via the Group’s in-house IP Team
•	
Group capital markets events, including 
presentations at sector showcase events and at 
the Group’s annual flagship event 
•	
Portfolio company management team 
presentations to the Board, either at the Group’s 
head office in London or onsite at the portfolio 
company, which enables open and transparent 
two-way engagement between the Board and the 
relevant portfolio company management teams
•	
Introductions/facilitating access to co-investors 
•	
Attending sector conferences and events 
alongside portfolio companies and their 
management teams
•	
Marketing including through the use of social 
media to amplify messaging around the portfolio
•	
Parkwalk annual portfolio showcase attended by 
investors/co-investors, advisors and government 
bodies 
•	
Engagement with portfolio companies including 
through ESG survey and provision of portfolio 
company best-practice policy toolkit.
•	
Development of strong and mutually 
supportive relationships between the 
Group and its portfolio companies
•	
Portfolio companies better 
understand the Group’s approach to 
strategy, decision-making processes 
and capital allocation
•	
The Group is able to use its investor 
director/observer positions to assist 
with governance, strategic planning 
and many other practical elements 
of building and growing a company
•	
Support in achieving completion 
of a number of portfolio company 
financing rounds
•	
Reduction of expenditure by portfolio 
companies on third-party advisory 
services
•	
	Enables the Group to operate more 
effective stewardship and oversight 
of portfolio companies throughout 
the year, including outside of 
investment cycles 
KEY
S.172(1) FACTORS
A
the likely 
consequences of 
any decision in the 
long term
B
the interests of 
the Company’s 
employees
C
the need to foster 
the Company’s 
business 
relationships 
with suppliers, 
customers 
and others
D
the impact of 
the Company’s 
operations on the 
community and 
the environment
E
the desirability 
of the Company 
maintaining a 
reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct
F
the need to act 
fairly between 
members of the 
Company
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
53
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Name of 
stakeholder 
and relevant 
application of S.172
Why we engage
Engagement methods – who and how
 Impact of engagement
Third-party 
fund investors 
and portfolio 
co-investors
s172(1)
A  C  E
To attract new strategic 
co-investors, including third-
party fund managers, to 
invest alongside the Group 
either directly or via a vehicle 
or arrangement managed 
by the Group.
To build an investment 
network to support co-
investment into the Group’s 
portfolio companies to 
ensure that they are 
adequately supported, both 
financially and in other areas 
such as board support, 
corporate governance and 
strategy.
To maintain strong 
relationships with existing 
investors who invest in the 
Group’s portfolio via funds 
or other arrangements 
managed by the Group.
•	
Direct meetings/calls between co-investors/third-
party fund investors and members of the Group’s 
senior management team 
•	
Direct meetings with the other Limited Partners in 
the Group’s US platform 
•	
Via portfolio company boards where several co-
investors have a board seat
•	
Attending conferences and sector events 
•	
Group capital markets events including its annual 
flagship event
•	
Broker-facilitated investor forums/conferences
•	
Parkwalk Advisors annual portfolio showcase and 
other investor events
•	
Built/maintained strong relationships 
with co-investors/fund investors 
and facilitated access for them into 
portfolio company financings
•	
Ensured such stakeholders were kept 
abreast of the Group’s strategy and 
approach to key matters through the 
year, including capital allocation
•	
Promoted the Group’s brand and 
reputation in sector ecosystems 
•	
Developed sources of new 
investment into the Group and/or its 
portfolio
 
Universities, 
academics 
and research 
institutions 
and Inventors, 
founders and 
entrepreneurs
s172(1)
A  C  E
To build, develop and 
maintain relationships with 
universities, academics and 
research institutions in order 
to identify promising science 
into which the Group can 
invest to grow transformative 
businesses that have a 
positive impact on the future 
around such science. 
To create and maintain 
a pipeline of compelling 
intellectual property-based 
opportunities.
•	
Regular interaction with universities within the UK, 
Europe, Australia and New Zealand 
•	
Annual relationship review in Australia and New 
Zealand
•	
Parkwalk representatives on relevant university 
fund investment committees
•	
Attending and presenting at sector events and 
conferences
•	
Meetings throughout the year with entrepreneurs 
and innovators 
•	
Maintained relationships between 
the Group and universities, 
academics and research 
institutions, which has ensured 
these stakeholders are aware of the 
Group’s strategy and funding model
•	
Generated a pipeline of potential 
new investment opportunities
•	
Relationships built/enhanced with 
founders and entrepreneurs across 
various ecosystems to ensure the 
Group is their partner of choice 
KEY
S.172(1) FACTORS
A
the likely 
consequences of 
any decision in the 
long term
B
the interests of 
the Company’s 
employees
C
the need to foster 
the Company’s 
business 
relationships 
with suppliers, 
customers 
and others
D
the impact of 
the Company’s 
operations on the 
community and 
the environment
E
the desirability 
of the Company 
maintaining a 
reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct
F
the need to act 
fairly between 
members of the 
Company
54	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Name of 
stakeholder 
and relevant 
application of S.172
Why we engage
Engagement methods – who and how
 Impact of engagement
The 
environment 
and wider 
community
s172(1)
A  D
To generate social and 
environmental impact, which 
is part of the Group’s core 
purpose.
•	
Via the Group’s portfolio companies
•	
Engagement with ESG Ratings agencies 
•	
Charity partnership with IntoUniversity
•	
Supported the 10,000 Black Interns programme
•	
Signatory to Investing in Women Code
•	
Member of UN Global Impact
•	
Member of UN Principles for Responsible 
Investment
•	
Identified and backed companies 
whose products and services 
contribute to a regenerative, 
healthier, tech-enriched future for 
the world
•	
Supported local and wider 
communities through charitable and 
fundraising initiatives
•	
Continued commitment to driving 
improvements in inclusion, diversity 
and equality across the Group 
and wider society via the Group’s 
Inclusion and Diversity Project plan
Debt holders
s172(1)
C  E
To build and maintain 
strong partnerships with the 
Group’s largest debt capital 
providers.
•	
Regular reporting requirements
•	
Direct conversations and consultation on matters 
relevant to existing debt holders
•	
Outreach to potential lenders on an ad hoc basis
•	
Group capital market events
•	
Continued strong relationships 
with the largest holders of the 
Group’s debt
•	
Understood debt-holders’ views on 
capital allocation and returns to 
shareholders, which enabled them to 
be taken into account on decisions 
by the Board, specifically in these 
areas (as referenced above)
Regulators
s172(1)
C  E
To maintain strong 
relationships with our 
regulators and to foster 
confidence in our strong 
compliance culture.
•	
Direct correspondence on transactions and other 
matters as necessary
•	
Correspondence with the Takeover Panel on 
concert party and other code-related matters
•	
Regular reporting to the Financial Conduct 
Authority, and incorporation of any feedback 
received 
•	
Regular reporting to the Securities and Futures 
Commission, the Australian Securities and 
Investment Commission, Australian Prudential 
Regulation Authority and the Australian 
Transaction Reports Analysis Centre
•	
Maintained strong relationships 
and communication lines with the 
Group’s regulators
•	
Confirmation of compliance with 
regulatory requirements 
KEY
S.172(1) FACTORS
A
the likely 
consequences of 
any decision in the 
long term
B
the interests of 
the Company’s 
employees
C
the need to foster 
the Company’s 
business 
relationships 
with suppliers, 
customers 
and others
D
the impact of 
the Company’s 
operations on the 
community and 
the environment
E
the desirability 
of the Company 
maintaining a 
reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct
F
the need to act 
fairly between 
members of the 
Company
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
55
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Name of 
stakeholder 
and relevant 
application of S.172
Why we engage
Engagement methods – who and how
 Impact of engagement
Brokers and 
advisors
s172(1)
C  E
To ensure those who 
represent us have a 
complete understanding 
of the Group’s strategy, 
performance, purpose and 
culture and to maintain 
strong relationships through 
our brokers and advisors 
with UK capital markets 
authorities.
•	
Regular dialogue and correspondence with 
brokers and advisors including industry analysts
•	
Group capital markets events and sales team 
presentations in connection with the annual and 
interim results
•	
Broker/advisors attendance at Company Board 
meetings to advise on specific strategic matters, 
shareholder feedback and sentiment and general 
market environment 
•	
Reinforced the strong relationships 
and communication lines between 
the Group and the Group’s Brokers 
and advisors
•	
Enhanced the brokers and advisors’ 
knowledge and understanding of the 
Group and its portfolio companies
Governance 
bodies
s172(1)
C  E
To maintain strong 
relationships with proxy 
advisors, the Investment 
Association, ESG ratings 
agencies and other 
governance bodies.
•	
	Engagement with ESG ratings agencies to help 
demonstrate the Group’s performance, as well as 
enabling identification of areas of improvement
•	
Engaged with the UK Government and 
parliamentarians on key issues and Mansion 
House Reforms
•	
Group CEO is a member of the London Stock 
Exchange Primary Markets Group
•	
Responded to UK Government consultations on 
matters impacting the Group and its portfolio 
including the revisions to the UK Corporate 
Governance Code, Long-term investment for 
Technology and Science initiative and R&D Tax 
Credits, and the UK’s Modern Industrial Strategy 
•	
Met with leads on the Edinburgh Reforms Review 
and the Spin Out Review 
•	
Two-way engagement with proxy bodies in 
relation to their reports on the Group’s Annual 
General Meeting and any other General Meetings
•	
Regular interaction with EIS Association and HMRC 
in relation to EIS investments
•	
Regular liaison with government-backed initiatives 
in relation to investment within the sector 
•	
Made sure the Group’s voice was 
heard on key issues relevant to the 
Group including on Mansion House 
Reforms, Listing and Prospectus Rules 
reforms, approach to carried interest 
and PISCES 
•	
Ensured the accuracy of the 
proxy voting reports and 
endeavoured to influence fair voting 
recommendations 
•	
Ensured the ESG ratings agencies 
were reporting accurately on 
the Group’s performance and 
proactively sought to address gaps 
KEY
S.172(1) FACTORS
A
the likely 
consequences of 
any decision in the 
long term
B
the interests of 
the Company’s 
employees
C
the need to foster 
the Company’s 
business 
relationships 
with suppliers, 
customers 
and others
D
the impact of 
the Company’s 
operations on the 
community and 
the environment
E
the desirability 
of the Company 
maintaining a 
reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct
F
the need to act 
fairly between 
members of the 
Company
56	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Key shareholder activities in 2024 
Q1
•	
Annual results presentation*
•	
Results roadshow
•	
Berenberg UK Corporate conference
Q2	
•	
Rothschild roadshow 
•	
AGM presentation*
•	
Switzerland roadshow
Q3	
•	
H1 results presentation*
•	
Results roadshow
Q4	
•	
Ireland roadshow
•	
Rothschild roadshow
•	
Cantor TMT Conference
•	
Middle East roadshow
•	
Berenberg European Conference
*	 available via the Investor Meet Company platform which is 
open to all stakeholders.
Shareholders by sector
Sector/owner
% at 31
December
2024
Pensions
25.47%
Mutual funds
25.13%
Retail
23.66%
Hedge
7.67%
Charities
4.78%
Insurance
4.12%
Investment trusts
3.31%
ETF
2.92%
SWF
1.55%
Other
1.39%
Details of substantial shareholders as at 31 December 2024 can be found on page 107.
Corporate governance and business conduct
In fulfilling its role as a responsible investor, the Group expects high levels of corporate governance within its 
portfolio companies. In the majority of the Group’s priority companies, the Group takes up a Board position 
to support this requirement. This helps to ensure that robust governance processes are in place within such 
companies, which the Group also supports through facilitating introductions to external advisors, sharing 
best practice and offering helpful guidance on new legislation. As part of its responsible stewardship 
responsibilities, the Group incorporates a requirement for portfolio companies to adopt and maintain 
various legal and governance policies to ensure such companies are operating in accordance with the 
high standards expected by the Group as an active investor. The Group has developed a best-practice 
policy toolkit, which is available to its portfolio companies and which provides template policies for the 
key governance and compliance policies that the Group expects its portfolio companies to have in place, 
including with regard to anti-corruption and bribery, data protection and “speaking up”.
The Group is committed to preventing modern slavery in its business and supply chains and has adopted 
principles and policies that are relevant to the prevention of modern slavery across its organisation and 
supply chains. This includes the payment of the London Living Wage. 
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
57
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Employees (including on inclusion, 
equity and diversity matters)
The Board considers engagement with its colleagues 
at all levels in the Group to be a key part of the Group’s 
culture, and a wide range of events and experiences are 
facilitated for employees to participate in, from both a 
work and wellbeing perspective.
As further described on page 52, IP Connect, the Group’s 
employee forum, works to ensure that employees’ 
voices are heard by the Group’s management team 
and Board. The forum facilitates meaningful and 
effective two-way communication between the Board 
(via Aedhmar Hynes, the Group’s Designated NED) 
and employees, enabling the Board to understand 
and actively consider the interests of employees in its 
discussions and the decisions it makes. This also helps 
to enable employees to understand (where practicable 
to do so) why certain decisions are made. The Board 
considers that the combination of a Designated NED 
and an employee forum continues to be welcomed by 
colleagues as an effective and appropriate approach to 
employee engagement within the Group. 
How stakeholders’ views are 
reported to the Board and influence 
the Board agenda
Through understanding the views of its stakeholders, the 
Board takes into account their opinions, preferences and 
concerns when debating and making decisions. Regular 
contact is maintained by the Chair, Senior Independent 
Director and the Executive Directors with the Group’s key 
shareholders, and, where considered appropriate, major 
institutional shareholders are consulted on significant 
decisions and transactions in contemplation. Where 
appropriate, Committee Chairs will also engage with 
key shareholders impacted by matters under the remit 
of their particular Committee. Key areas of discussion 
over the last year have related to progress against 
the Group’s strategy, the Group’s approach to capital 
allocation including returns to shareholders, the Group’s 
operating costs, the disparity between the Group’s share 
price and NAV per share, and shareholder returns. 
Training and Board processes 
The Board receives regular training on its s172 
obligations to keep current with evolving market 
expectations. Information relating to stakeholder 
issues is included in relevant Board papers to enable 
the Board to understand and consider relevant 
stakeholder interests when making principal decisions. 
This information incorporates feedback received from 
relevant stakeholders through ongoing stakeholder 
engagement. 
Where appropriate, being mindful of its obligations as 
a listed company and confidentiality requirements, 
the Board will, in limited circumstances, seek input 
from key stakeholders prior to a decision being taken. 
In each case, the Directors consider how a short-term 
decision (for example, to sell an asset and achieve 
an immediate financial return) links into the Group’s 
overall strategy to create long-term value for its 
shareholders. The same considerations are taken into 
account by the Investment Committee(s) in relation 
to decisions made, or proposals recommended to the 
Board, under the delegated authorities. Following any 
principal Board decision, and where appropriate, the 
Board will reach out to relevant stakeholders to explain 
its decision as part of its continued meaningful two-way 
communication with stakeholders.
Board approval
The Strategic Report as set out on pages 05 to 58 has 
been approved by the Board. 
On behalf of the Board
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
24 March 2025
58	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
WORKING WITH THE GROUP’S STAKEHOLDERS.
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Executive/Non-executive split
2
1
4
KEY
  Executive Director
  Non-executive Director
  Non-executive Chair 
Board tenure 
6
2
1
KEY
  0–2 years 
  3–5 years
  Over 5 years
Gender balance
3
4
KEY
  Male
  Female
Governance highlights 2024
Share buyback
In October 2024, the Board approved the extension of 
the Group’s buyback programme (utilising a percentage 
of realisation proceeds received in the year to date) 
and cancellation of shares held in treasury. Further, in 
December 2024, the Board approved the application of all 
proceeds received from a partial portfolio sale agreed in 
December and 20% of the proceeds received from the sale 
of Featurespace Limited towards a further extension of the 
existing buyback programme to run through 2025
	Read more on 
page 25
Realisations
The Board approved the sales of Garrison Limited (July 2024) 
and Featurespace Limited (September 2024)
	Read more on 
page 11
International
The Board approved the cessation of plans to enter the 
China market through a joint venture 
	
2024 UK 
Corporate 
Governance 
Code 
The Board has continued to review and evolve the Group’s 
corporate governance arrangements and practices, 
including reviewing the Group’s preparedness for the 2024 UK 
Corporate Governance Code, which will apply to the Group 
from the 2025/26 financial year, to ensure full compliance 
with the new code prior to it coming into force. 
	
Corporate 
reorganisation
On 31 July 2024 the Board approved a reorganisation of 
the operating model of the Group in order to improve the 
efficiency and reduce the ongoing cost base of the Group 
	Read more on 
page 12
Board and Committee attendance
The following table shows the attendance of Directors at scheduled Board and Committee meetings in 2024:
Board 
meetings
Audit and Risk 
Committee1
Nomination 
Committee
Remuneration 
Committee
Sir Douglas Flint
7/7
–
3/3
6/6
Greg Smith
7/7
–
–
–
David Baynes
7/7
–
–
–
Heejae Chae
7/7
7/7
3/3
6/6
Dr Caroline Brown
7/7
7/7
3/3
6/6
Aedhmar Hynes
7/7
7/7
3/3
6/6
Anita Kidgell
7/7
7/7
3/3
6/6
Dr Elaine Sullivan2
3/3
2/3
1/1
2/3
1	
The Chair, CEO and CFO attend as observers
2	 Dr Elaine Sullivan retired from the Board on 12 June 2024.
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
59
GOVERNANCE AT A GLANCE.
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE

Board Skills Matrix
Skills focus
Individual
Strategic  
leadership
Shareholder 
engagement
UK plc experience
Shareholder value 
delivery
Experience of 
innovation
Audit & portfolio 
valuation
Tech  
expertise
Life science 
expertise
Chair experience/
capability
Strategy definition
Comms, branding, 
IR
Access to global 
networks
International 
experience
Sir Douglas Flint CBE
Chair/Nomination chair
Greg Smith
Chief Executive Officer
David Baynes
Chief Financial and 
Operating Officer
Aedhmar Hynes
Senior Independent 
Director and Designated 
Non-executive Director
Dr Caroline Brown
Non-executive Director/ 
Audit and Risk Chair
Heejae Chae
Non-executive Director/
Remuneration Chair
Anita Kidgell
Non-executive Director
Compliance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018
The table below shows the principles set out in the Code and 
where key content can be found.
Board leadership and Company purpose
Board of Directors
61 to 63
Chair’s Corporate Governance Statement
65 to 71
Culture
03 and 52
Employee engagement
29
Governance framework
64
Purpose
IFC
Section 172 Statement
50 to 58
Shareholder and stakeholder engagement
50 to 58
Division of responsibilities
The role of the Board and Committees
66 and 68
Board and Committee attendance
59
Composition of the Board
68 to 70
Director rotation and independence
70
Composition, succession and evaluation
Board biographies
61 to 63
Board composition
68 to 70
Board effectiveness and evaluation
75 to 77
Inclusion and diversity
74
Induction, awareness and development
73
Nomination Committee Report
72 to 77
Succession planning
74 to 75
Audit, risk and internal control
External audit
105
Going concern and long-term viability
49 
and 107
Internal audit
104
Risk and internal controls
104
Remuneration
Directors’ Remuneration Report
78 to 100
60	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
GOVERNANCE AT A GLANCE.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

C
KEY
Audit and Risk Committee
Nomination Committee
Remuneration Committee
C
Chair
1	
Subject to renewal for subsequent three-year terms as set out on page 70.
2	 Excludes appointments to Group portfolio company boards.
Sir Douglas Flint CBE
Non-executive Chair
Effective date of current letter of appointment: Appointed as a 
Non-executive Director from 17 September 2018 and as Non-executive Chair 
from 1 November 2018
Independent: n/a1
Tenure: 6 years (renewed in September 2024)
Term of office: 3 years1, 3 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
Sir Douglas has extensive experience of public company board leadership, 
which helps to focus Board discussion and challenge on the design and 
delivery of our strategy. His collaborative approach helps to facilitate open 
and constructive boardroom discussion. Previously, Sir Douglas served as 
Group Chairman of HSBC Holdings plc from 2010 to 2017. For 15 years prior to 
this he was HSBC’s group finance director, joining from KPMG where he was 
a partner. Between 2005 and 2011, Sir Douglas served as a non-executive 
director on the board of bp plc, latterly chairing its audit committee.
Key external appointments
In other current roles, Sir Douglas is Chairman of Aberdeen plc, Chairman 
of the Royal Marsden hospital and charity and a member of a number of 
advisory boards and trade associations, through which he keeps abreast 
of industry, regulatory and international affairs of relevance to his public 
company responsibilities. In 2022, Sir Douglas was appointed as chair of the 
UK Government’s Digitalisation Taskforce. 
Greg Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Effective date of current service agreement: 6 October 2021
Independent: No
Tenure: 13 years as an Executive Director, 3 years as Chief Executive Officer
Term of office: Permanent, 6 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
Greg gained significant knowledge of the Group and the sector in which it 
operates through his decade-long tenure as Chief Financial Officer of the 
Group, during which he contributed broadly and successfully to the Group’s 
expansion geographically, and in scale. He has deep experience of capital 
and resource allocation, and investment appraisal, and this experience, 
together with his financial expertise, plays a fundamental role in driving the 
Group’s strategy, purpose and vision. 
His strong communication skills have been critical to maintaining and 
optimising the Group’s relationship with its key stakeholders. Prior to joining 
the Group, Greg held positions at both Tarchon Capital and KPMG. Greg is a 
Fellow of the ICAEW and holds a degree in mathematics. 
Key external appointments
Greg is on a number of advisory bodies which seek to make the UK’s 
capital markets more accessible to smaller companies, in terms of both 
public listing and scale-up capital, particularly for those companies whose 
business is based on innovative science and technology.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
61
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

C
KEY
Audit and Risk Committee
Nomination Committee
Remuneration Committee
C
Chair
1	
Subject to renewal for subsequent three-year terms as set out on page 70.
2	 Excludes appointments to Group portfolio company boards.
Aedhmar Hynes
Senior Independent Director and Designated  
Non-executive Director for employee engagement
Effective date of current letter of appointment: 
1 August 2019
Independent: Yes
Tenure: 5 years (renewed in August 2022)
Term of office: 3 years1, 3 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
Aedhmar brings valuable experience to the Board in 
relation to technology disruption, digital transformation 
and marketing and strategic communications. Aedhmar 
has many years’ experience in communications and 
is the former CEO of Text100, a digital communications 
agency with 22 offices and over 600 consulting staff 
across Europe, Asia and North America. 
Aedhmar is also the Senior Independent Director and 
the Group’s Designated Non-executive Director for 
employee engagement on the Board.
Key external appointments
Aedhmar is trustee of Connecticut Public Broadcasting 
and The Page Society, a Board Director of Jackson Family 
Wines, Technoserve and Fluidra S.A, member of the US 
Foundation Board of the National University of Ireland, 
Galway and a Henry Crown Fellow at The Aspen Institute.
David Baynes
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
Effective date of current service agreement: 
6 October 2021
Independent: No
Tenure: 11 years as an Executive Director, 3 years as Chief 
Financial and Operating Officer
Term of office: Permanent, 6 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
David’s financial background and expertise, together 
with his experience gained during his tenure as the Chief 
Operating Officer of the Group, provide the experience 
required to drive the Group’s achievement of its financial 
goals and operating targets. David has a long track 
record of working successfully with the boards of 
investee companies as they develop and mature, often 
in challenging and disruptive circumstances. David 
was appointed to the Board in March 2014 following the 
acquisition by the Group of Fusion IP plc where he held 
the position of Chief Executive Officer for ten years. 
David brings previous additional experience taking 
companies from start-up to full listing on the London 
Stock Exchange, which he has done three times. David 
was also previously CFO of Codemasters Limited.
Key external appointments2
None
Dr Caroline Brown
Non-executive Director
Effective date of current letter of appointment: 
1 July 2019
Independent: Yes
Tenure: 5 years (renewed in June 2022)
Term of office: 3 years1, 3 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
Caroline has a wealth of experience covering 
accounting and audit, banking and investments, as 
well as science and technology, all of which are highly 
relevant for the Board. Caroline holds a first class 
degree and PhD in Natural Sciences from the University 
of Cambridge, a Masters of Business Administration 
from Bayes Business School, London and is a Fellow of 
the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. 
She has over 20 years’ plc board experience and held 
previous positions in corporate finance at BAML (New 
York), UBS and HSBC. 
Key external appointments
Caroline is a Non-executive Director of CAB Payment 
Holdings plc, Luceco plc and Ceres Power Holdings plc. 
She is also a Non-executive external member of the 
global partnership council of Clifford Chance LLP.
62	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

C
KEY
Audit and Risk Committee
Nomination Committee
Remuneration Committee
C
Chair
1	
Subject to renewal for subsequent three-year terms as set out on page 70.
2	 Excludes appointments to Group portfolio company boards.
Heejae Chae
Non-executive Director
Effective date of current letter of appointment: 
3 May 2018
Independent: Yes
Tenure: 6 years (renewed in May 2024)
Term of office: 3 years1, 3 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
Heejae is an experienced public company director, 
bringing both knowledge of finance and industry, having 
spent the early part of his career in finance at The 
Blackstone Group and Credit Suisse First Boston before 
moving into industry. Heejae’s former positions include 
CEO of Scapa Group plc, Group Chief Executive of Volex 
Group plc and Group General Manager for Amphenol 
Corporation. 
Key external appointments
Heejae is Executive Chairman of Sysgroup plc and 
Non-Executive Director of Elementis plc.
Anita Kidgell
Non-executive Director
Effective date of current letter of appointment: 
18 January 2023
Independent: Yes
Tenure: 2 years
Term of office: 3 years1, 3 months’ notice
Re-election to Board: Annually at AGM
Skills and experience
Anita has over 25 years of pharmaceutical experience 
spanning multiple disciplines. She is currently Head 
of Corporate Strategy at GSK with over ten years of 
experience of leading strategic initiatives in numerous 
areas including China, ESG, geopolitics as well as 
integrations and demergers. Between 2004 and 2007 
she was the Global Head of Investor Relations at GSK 
and prior to this held senior positions in Corporate 
Communications, at GlaxoWellcome and at the 
Brunswick Group. 
Anita has a First Class Honours degree in Applied 
Biology and has more than ten years’ experience 
in pharmaceutical Discovery Research and Clinical 
Development.
Key external appointments
Anita is Head of Corporate Strategy at GSK.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
63
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

The Board
Audit and Risk 
Committee
Pages 101 to 105
Investment Committees
Page 69
Chair
Investment & Capital Group
Page 68
Nomination 
Committee
Pages 72 to 77
ESG Committee
Page 32
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial and  
Operating Officer
Remuneration 
Committee
Pages 78 to 100
Ethics Committee
Page 65
Senior Independent Director
Platform Group
Page 68
Disclosure 
Committee
Page 69
Company Secretary
Non-executive Directors
Executive Directors
Compliance with 
the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018 
(the “Code”) 
The Board is committed to meeting 
the high standard of corporate 
governance set out within the 
Code (available at www.frc.org.uk/
directors/corporate-governance-
and-stewardship/uk-corporate-
governance-code) and to 
demonstrating compliance with 
best practice as it develops. 
The Group confirms it applied the 
principles and complied with all the 
provisions of the Code throughout 
the year.
	Read Board biographies  
on pages 61 to 63
	Read Board activities  
on page 68
	Read roles and responsibilities 
of the Board on page 66
Valuation Committee
Page 103
64	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Corporate governance
Effective corporate governance is integral to the 
Board’s oversight of the design and execution of 
the Group’s strategy. The Board confirms that it 
has continued to meet the requirements of the 
Code. The Board recognises its accountability to 
the Company’s shareholders for good governance, 
and this report, together with the reports of the 
Remuneration, Nomination, and Audit and Risk 
Committees of the Board, describe the Group’s 
approach to meeting the highest standards of 
corporate governance and highlight the key 
developments that have taken place in this area 
during the year.
Board changes
Dr Elaine Sullivan retired from the Board in June 2024 
following nine years of service to the Company. Once 
again, the Company expresses its sincere thanks to 
Dr Sullivan for her valuable contribution and input 
during this period of service. Further information on 
the current Board composition can be found in the 
Nomination Committee Report on page 72. 
ESG
The Group upholds strong business values that 
continue to guide the Group in implementing 
its strategy, and employees are encouraged to 
demonstrate these values throughout their work. 
Two executive committees oversee implementation 
of and monitor compliance with the Group’s 
obligations to conduct business responsibly, 
reporting periodically to the Board; the ESG 
Committee has responsibility for the oversight 
and implementation of the Group’s ESG and 
Sustainability policy, and the Ethics Committee 
provides guidance to the Group on ethical issues 
and monitors compliance with the Group’s Ethical 
Investment Framework. These committees work 
together to ensure that the Group’s values and 
culture are also embedded in the Group’s capital 
allocation framework. Further details on the ESG 
Committee and Ethics Committee, and on how the 
Group mitigates climate-related risk, are included on 
page 32. 
Consideration of stakeholders
The Board recognises the importance of building 
and maintaining strong relationships and two-way 
engagement with all the Group’s stakeholders, 
in order to promote the long-term success of 
the Company and earn their continuing support 
for the Group’s purpose, vision and strategy. The 
Group continues to foster a culture of innovation, 
mutual support, diversity and inclusion. The Group 
encourages its employees to engage in healthy 
debate and challenge so that it can consider a 
wide range of opinions when making decisions. 
For more information on the culture that the Group 
seeks to foster, and the code of conduct and values 
framework and guidelines developed to deliver that 
culture, see page 58. For further details on how the 
Directors have complied with their duties under 
s172 of the Companies Act 2006 (the “CA 2006”), 
including in their decision-making, please refer to 
pages 50 to 57. 
I look forward to welcoming shareholders to our AGM 
on 12 June 2025, which will be held at the Company’s 
registered office at 3 Pancras Square, King’s Cross, 
London, N1C 4AG. In addition, and to facilitate 
engagement with shareholders throughout the 
year, the Group maintains a dedicated Company 
Secretary email address (cosec@ipgroupplc.com) 
through which shareholders can submit questions at 
any time.
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
25 March 2025
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
The Board recognises the importance 
of building and maintaining 
strong relationships and two-way 
engagement with all the Group’s 
stakeholders in order to promote the 
long-term success of the Company 
and earn their continuing support. 
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
65
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE

The Board
Role and responsibilities of the Board
The Board is responsible to the Company’s shareholders 
for the overall management of the Group in a way that 
promotes the Group’s long-term sustainable success, 
taking into account the interests of shareholders 
and all other relevant stakeholders in carrying out 
this responsibility. The Board defines, challenges and 
interrogates the Group’s strategic aims and direction, 
and provides entrepreneurial leadership within a 
framework of controls for assessing and managing 
risk. The Board recognises that, in discharging 
its responsibilities, it is necessary to support the 
maintenance and evolution of a policy and decision-
making framework in which the Group’s strategic aims 
are implemented through the following:
•	
ensuring that the necessary financial and human 
resources are in place to meet those aims and to 
ensure the Group is a home for exceptional talent 
•	
monitoring performance against key financial and 
non-financial performance indicators 
•	
embedding a robust performance management 
framework and aligning reward with the long-term 
interests of stakeholders
•	
planning for Board and senior management 
succession
•	
overseeing and challenging the system of risk 
management 
•	
setting and monitoring adherence to mandated 
values and standards in governance matters
•	
monitoring environmental, social and governance 
policies and performance 
•	
helping to shape and embed the Group’s purpose, 
vision, strategy, values and culture
The Board recognises that its role in setting, monitoring 
and enforcing the standards of behaviour it expects 
from its people is of key importance. The Group’s culture 
is one of the key strengths of its business and plays 
a strong role in attracting, retaining and incentivising 
the most talented people. Further information on the 
Group’s culture and its values is on page 03.
In supporting the Group’s business and its portfolio 
companies, the Board acknowledges the key roles 
the Group’s operational functions play in the fields of 
capital raising, legal advice and support, intellectual 
property strategy and due diligence support. These sit 
alongside and support the hands-on approach and 
high level of engagement provided by the experienced, 
sector-specific investment partnership team members. 
The Directors believe that the Group’s approach to 
supporting its portfolio companies in this way is unique 
and serves not only to build sustainable businesses 
with longevity, but will also provide attractive returns for 
stakeholders, by creating value over the longer term.
The responsibility of the Directors in promoting the 
long-term success of the Company and thereby the 
Group is collective and recognises their respective roles 
as Executive Directors and Non-executive Directors. 
The Non-executive Directors are responsible for 
constructively challenging and contributing to proposals 
on strategy as part of the Board approval process, 
scrutinising the performance of executive management 
against targets set and determining appropriate levels 
of remuneration. The Non-executive Directors must 
also satisfy themselves of the integrity of financial 
information, and that financial controls and systems 
of risk management are robust and comprehensive. 
The Executive Directors are responsible for making and 
implementing day-to-day decisions (other than matters 
reserved for the Board) within the risk appetite and 
tolerance and operating and financial constraints set by 
the Board.
The Board reviews the purpose, vision and strategy of 
the Group and any issues arising from it on a regular 
basis, and exercises control over the performance of the 
Group by agreeing budgetary and other targets and 
monitoring performance against those targets.
66	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Division of responsibilities
Chair
•	
	Leadership and conduct of the Board, encouraging open and constructive discussion and challenge
•	
Promotes high standards of governance and Board effectiveness, including incorporating the views and interests of stakeholders into Board 
decision-making
•	
Ensures active engagement and effective communication with shareholders
•	
Sets the Board’s agenda and is responsible for ensuring the committees carry out their duties
•	
Ensures that Board members receive timely, accurate and clear information about the Group’s activities
•	
Ensures that Board members receive appropriate induction and ongoing training on the Group’s activities and their own responsibilities
•	
Leads performance assessment of Board members
Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”)
•	
Leads on development and delivery of strategy
•	
Leads the management of the Group and establishes financial and operational targets
•	
Leads the management of the Group in incorporating ESG factors into the Group’s strategy and business model
•	
Responsible for building a team that is able to effectively identify, back and grow impactful early-stage innovation-led companies into a 
diversified portfolio of robust, transformative businesses, and for embedding a culture that ensures the team is highly engaged and motivated 
to deliver
•	
Leads delivery of the Group’s operating plans and budgets and the recommendations in respect of, and the subsequent execution of, Board 
decisions
•	
Leads succession planning for the senior executive positions alongside the Group People Director and reports to the Nomination Committee 
thereon
•	
Represents the Group to external stakeholders and engages with them on the Group’s purpose and strategy
Chief Financial and 
Operating Officer 
(“CFOO”)
•	
Oversight and executive responsibility for the Group’s financial and operational systems, processes and matters
•	
Maintains an efficient and effective controls environment, including protecting the Group against cyber risks
•	
Responsible for executing day-to-day decisions (other than matters reserved for the Board) within the risk appetite and tolerance and 
operating and financial constraints set by the Board
•	
Monitors operating and financial performance against agreed budgets and targets and reports to the Board on the same
•	
Ensures the Group’s financial structure and capacity supports the Group’s objectives
Senior Independent 
Director
•	
Available to shareholders to discuss their views and concerns when required
•	
Intermediary between the Board and the Chair
•	
Leads the Board in deliberations where the Chair is conflicted
•	
Leads assessment of the Chair’s performance and on any Chair succession matters
Non-executive 
Directors (as part of 
the Board)
•	
Approve Group strategy and operating plans
•	
Approve business and financing models
•	
Discuss and constructively challenge executive recommendations on matters brought to the Board
•	
Monitor and performance manage delivery of strategy and operating plans
•	
Provide independent views, support and specialist knowledge
•	
Serve on committees of the Board
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
67
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Board activities during 2024
Principal decisions
•	
Approved extensions of the Group’s share buyback 
programme and cancellation of shares held in 
treasury
•	
Approved amendments to the Group’s delegated 
investment and realisation authorities (the 
“Delegated Authorities”)
•	
Approved significant portfolio company investments 
and divestments required in line with the Delegated 
Authorities 
•	
Approved revisions to the Group’s Capital 
Allocation Policy
•	
Approved a corporate reorganisation in order to 
streamline decision-making and reduce operating 
expenses
Board and Committee composition  
and conduct
•	
Reviewed succession planning for the Executive 
Directors, senior leadership and Non-executive Board 
positions, including the Chair 
Strategy and risk
•	
Continued to support and engage with the Executive 
Directors on the implementation of the Group’s 
strategic aims 
•	
Reviewed the Group’s performance within its 
competitive landscape
•	
Regularly discussed and debated the form and 
implementation of the Group’s Capital Allocation 
Policy 
•	
Debated in detail the Group’s principal risks and the 
Board’s approach to the setting of its risk appetite 
•	
Considered the longer-term emerging risks that may 
impact the Group and its business
Corporate Governance
•	
Reviewed policies, processes and procedures to 
ensure continued compliance with the Code
•	
Reviewed, and updated where necessary, the terms 
of reference for its committees
•	
Received regular updates from the Group’s core 
business units and operational functions
•	
Implemented the recommendations from the 2023 
internal Board evaluation 
Stakeholders
•	
Considered the Company’s ability to return cash to 
shareholders
•	
Extended the share buyback programme 
•	
Received presentations from the Company’s 
financial advisors on the current market climate and 
shareholder activism
•	
Discussed the Company’s share price performance, 
in particular the discount to NAV and actions to be 
taken to narrow the gap 
•	
Received quarterly people updates from the Group 
People Director including on progress to embed 
the Group’s culture and values, improve inclusion 
and diversity, expand learning and development 
resources and the results and actions from the 
regular staff surveys 
•	
Received updates at each Board meeting from the 
investment teams, which included detail on the short 
to medium-term strategy for each partnership and 
performance of their focus portfolio companies
Schedule of matters
Except for a formal schedule of matters, which are 
reserved for decision and approval by the Board, the 
Board has delegated the day-to-day management 
of the Group’s operations to the Executive Directors, 
supported closely by members of the senior 
management team. The schedule of matters reserved 
for Board decision and approval are those significant 
to the Group as a whole due to their strategic, financial 
and/or reputational implications. The schedule can be 
found within the Corporate governance section of the 
Group’s website at www.ipgroupplc.com. This schedule 
was reviewed in early 2024 and all recommended 
changes were accepted by the Board. The schedule will 
be reviewed again in 2025.
Committees and oversight
In addition to the Executive Directors, the Board 
delegates specific responsibilities to certain committees 
that assist the Board in carrying out its functions and 
ensure independent oversight of internal control and risk 
management.
Each of the three principal committees of the Board 
(Audit and Risk, Nomination and Remuneration) has 
its own terms of reference, which set out the specific 
matters for which delegated authority has been given 
by the Board and which can be found within the 
Corporate governance section of the Group’s website at 
www.ipgroupplc.com.
Separate reports on the role, composition, 
responsibilities and operation of each of the Nomination, 
Remuneration and Audit and Risk Committees are set 
out on pages 72, 78 and 101, respectively.
The Group’s Corporate Governance Framework set out 
on page 64 illustrates the structure of the Board and its 
principal committees. Under the Board level, decision-
making sits with the Executive Directors, supported by 
their Investment & Capital and Platform Groups, which 
both comprise members of the senior leadership 
team and have primary authority for the day-to-day 
management of the Group’s operations, save for those 
matters that are expressly reserved for the Board or its 
committees. 
68	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

The Disclosure Committee assists the Group in making 
timely and accurate disclosure of all information that 
is required to be disclosed in order for the Group to 
meet its legal and regulatory obligations, including 
under the Market Abuse Regulation, and ensures 
that relevant training is provided to the Board and 
to the wider employee base. This Committee takes 
responsibility for the assessment and control of inside 
information, both in respect of the Group and its quoted 
portfolio companies. The composition of the Disclosure 
Committee comprises the Executive Directors, the 
Group General Counsel, the UK General Counsel, the 
Director of Communications and a minimum of one 
Non-executive Director. 
The Group operates Investment Committees for (i) 
balance sheet investment decisions and (ii) Australian 
investment decisions. Decisions relating to investments 
and divestments in portfolio companies (other than 
those reserved for the Board) are delegated to 
the relevant Investment Committee within defined 
parameters and with specific quorum requirements. 
Separate investment committees are operated by 
the Group for third party funds managed by the 
Group. Additional executive oversight of key operating 
subsidiaries is provided by the CEO sitting on the 
Parkwalk Advisors board and both the CEO and CFOO 
sitting on the board of the Group’s principal Australian 
subsidiary. 
Board size and composition 
As at 31 December 2024, there were seven Directors 
on the Board: the Chair, two Executive Directors and 
four Non-executive Directors. The biographies of all 
Directors are provided on pages 61 to 63 and details with 
respect to the diversity of the Board are set out in the 
Nomination Committee Report on page 74.
In accordance with the provisions of the Code, all the 
Directors will be offering themselves for re-election at 
the 2025 AGM. The Board unanimously recommends to 
shareholders the reappointment of the Directors offering 
themselves for re-election. The annual Board evaluation 
and the annual one-to-one performance appraisal 
process confirmed that all Directors of the Company 
are effective, commit the required time demanded of 
them, and continue to display the appropriate level of 
commitment in their respective roles. 
Diversity
The disclosure required by DTR 7.2.8A relating to the 
Group’s diversity policy is presented in the Nomination 
Committee Report on page 74 and in the Meaningful 
impact section on page 30. 
Company Secretary
All Directors have access to the impartial advice and 
services of the Company Secretary. The Company 
Secretary acts as a key point of contact for the Chair 
and has an important role in ensuring both the quality 
of information that flows between the Executive and 
Non-executive Directors and that any agreed actions 
are completed. The Company Secretary supports the 
Chair and the Nomination Committee on performance 
evaluation, the induction of new Directors and the 
continuing development of current Directors to enable 
them to comply with their duties and effectively carry 
out their roles.
Non-executive Directors
The Non-executive Directors provide a wide and 
diverse range of skills and experience to the Group as 
detailed on page 60. By virtue of this, the Non-executive 
Directors collectively are well placed to constructively 
challenge and scrutinise the performance of executive 
management at both Board and Committee meetings.
In order to protect their independence, the Group does 
not permit Non-executive Directors to invest personally 
in any of the Group’s portfolio companies. All of the Non-
executive Directors comply with this policy. 
All Directors are required to obtain the approval of 
the Board before taking on any further directorial 
appointments or other significant external appointment, 
or any engagement with an organisation that competes 
with the Group (whether directly or indirectly). In all 
cases, Non-executive Directors must ensure that the 
aggregate time committed to external appointments 
does not impinge upon the time they have committed 
to the Group. The Executive Directors are restricted 
to only one external (outside the Group) board 
appointment. Details of key external appointments of the 
Directors can be found on pages 61 to 63.
Board meetings, provision of 
information and decisions
The Board and its Committees meet on a scheduled 
basis throughout the year as well as on an ad hoc 
basis, as required in response to the needs of the 
Group’s business.
The Board had 7 scheduled Board meetings and a two-
day strategy session in 2024; 7 Board meetings including 
a two-day strategy session are scheduled for 2025. The 
requirement for additional scheduled meetings is kept 
under review by the Chair and the Company Secretary. 
Meetings between the Chair and the Non-executive 
Directors, including informal dinners both with and 
without the presence of the CEO and other executive 
team members, are also held throughout the year.
The Chair, CEO and members of the Platform Group and 
Investment & Capital Group work together to ensure 
that the Directors receive relevant information to enable 
them to discharge their duties and that such information 
is accurate, timely and clear. This information includes 
management accounts containing an analysis of 
performance against budgets and other forecasts, 
as well as written reports from the UK investment 
partnership, the Australasian and US businesses, the 
capital markets division, the Group’s IR, Communications 
and ESG functions and Parkwalk Advisors. Additional 
information is provided as appropriate or if requested. 
At each Board meeting, the Board receives information, 
verbal reports and presentations from the CEO and 
the CFOO, the Managing Partner of the UK investment 
partnership and, by invitation, other members of 
the senior management. This includes bi-annual 
presentations from the Australasian business units and 
presentations from Parkwalk Advisors, the Group People 
Director, the Group Finance Director and Director of 
Communications. These presentations ensure that all 
Directors are aware of, and are in a position to monitor 
effectively, the overall performance of the Group, the 
development and implementation of its strategy and its 
management of risk. In addition, the Board receives in-
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
69
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

depth presentations throughout the year from selected 
portfolio companies, including through engaging in 
site visits.
Directors’ conflicts of interest
The Company operates a Conflicts of Interest Policy 
which contains procedures for disclosing and managing 
conflicts of interest within the Group, at the Board, 
and Investment Committee-levels, with the Company 
Secretary responsible for the maintenance of a 
register of Directors’ conflicts of interest. The Board 
has established procedures for managing and, where 
appropriate, authorising any such conflicts or potential 
conflicts of interest. Directors’ conflicts are a recurring 
agenda item at all Board meetings, and this gives 
Directors the opportunity to raise at the beginning of 
every Board meeting any actual or potential conflict 
of interests that they may have on the matters to be 
discussed. The Board may revoke or vary any conflicts 
authorisation at any time. The Board believes that the 
procedures established to deal with conflicts of interest 
are operating effectively.
Induction, awareness and 
ongoing development 
As detailed on page 73 of the Nomination Committee 
Report, a comprehensive induction process is in 
place for new Directors. The programme is tailored to 
the needs of the individual Director and agreed with 
them in advance to ensure that they can gain a full 
understanding of the Group and its businesses.
On an annual basis, the Company Secretary arranges 
for an external governance specialist to attend one 
Board meeting to present on the key Corporate 
Governance changes over the previous twelve months 
and to signpost expected prospective developments. 
In addition, the Board is kept updated by the in-
house legal team on key legislative and governance 
changes and sentiment affecting the Group and how 
the Group is ensuring its compliance and obligations 
under all relevant legislation. The Board also receives 
presentations from its brokers and financial advisors on 
capital market developments in general and specific to 
the Company on an ad hoc basis. 
As a part of their ongoing development, each Director 
receives feedback on their performance following the 
Board’s performance evaluation each year, following 
which, the Chair will review and agree with each 
Director their training and development needs for 
the year ahead. Access to training and development 
opportunities, including those relevant to the Non-
executive Directors’ membership on the Board’s 
committees, is facilitated through the Company 
Secretary. Further details relating to the assessment 
of the Board’s performance are set out on pages 76 
and 77.
Director rotation and independence
The Nomination Committee, supported by the 
Company Secretary, has responsibility for succession 
planning for each of the Non-executive Directors 
(including the Chair). Each Non-executive Director 
is appointed for an initial three-year term pursuant 
to their respective letters of appointment. This initial 
term is then subject to renewal for subsequent three-
year term(s) and, other than the Chair, to a maximum 
of three consecutive three-year terms in order to 
maintain their independence from a governance 
perspective, in accordance with the Code. Provision 
19 of the Code applies to the maximum term for the 
Chair’s appointment, and the Nomination Committee 
is responsible for ensuring compliance with this 
provision. The Chair was considered by the Board to be 
independent on appointment. 
Statement of Non-executive 
Directors’ independence
The Code sets out the circumstances that should be 
relevant to the Board in determining whether each 
Non-executive Director is independent. The Board 
considers Non-executive Director independence on an 
annual basis as part of each Non-executive Director’s 
performance evaluation. Having undertaken this review, 
and with due regard to Provision 10 of the Code, the 
Board concluded that all the Non-executive Directors 
are considered to be independent of management 
and free of any relationship or circumstance that could 
materially influence or interfere with, or affect, or appear 
to affect, the exercise of their independent judgement.
Internal controls and risk 
management 
The Board recognises the importance of the Financial 
Reporting Council’s Guidance on Risk Management, 
Internal Control and Related Financial and Business 
Reporting. The Group’s internal controls (including key 
financial operational and compliance controls), which 
are Group-wide and were in place throughout 2024, 
were reviewed by the Board, with no significant failings 
or weaknesses being identified in respect of the year 
ended 31 December 2024 and up to the date of approval 
of the Annual Report and Accounts. Where the Board 
has identified areas requiring improvement, processes 
have been put in place to ensure that the necessary 
action is taken and that progress in such areas is 
monitored. Details of the Group’s internal controls and 
risk management systems are provided on pages 38 
and 39. 
The Board is responsible for establishing and 
monitoring internal control systems and for reviewing 
the effectiveness of these systems. The Board 
views the effective operation of a rigorous system 
of internal control as critical to the success of the 
Group. However, it recognises that such systems can 
provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance 
against material misstatement or loss. Details of 
the effectiveness reviews of the systems of risk 
management and internal control are provided on 
page 104.
The key elements of the Group’s internal control system, 
all of which have been in place during the financial year 
and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and 
Accounts, are as follows:
Control environment 
and procedures
The Group has a clear organisational structure with 
defined responsibilities and accountabilities. Its values 
surrounding expectation of quality, integrity and ethics 
are well documented and communicated clearly 
throughout the whole organisation. An overview of 
the Group’s risk management framework is set out on 
pages 38 and 39.
70	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

The Group accesses outsourced internal audit expertise 
provided by PwC. Details of the internal audit activity 
during 2024, are on page 104.
Detailed written policies and procedures have been 
established covering key operating and compliance 
risk areas. These are reviewed and updated at least 
annually by the Audit and Risk Committee.
Identification and evaluation of 
principal risks and uncertainties
The operations of the Group and the implementation 
of its objectives and strategy are subject to a number 
of risks and uncertainties. The Board actively identifies 
and evaluates the risks inherent in the business; 
formally reviews these on at least an annual basis (or 
as market or business developments require); and 
ensures that appropriate controls and procedures 
are in place to monitor and, where possible, mitigate 
these risks. Specifically, all decisions relating to strategic 
partnerships and other collaborations, strategic 
acquisitions and disposals and significant long-term 
debt facilities entered into by the Group are reserved for 
the Board’s review and approval. 
The Board regularly reviews significant fair-value 
movements in individual portfolio companies, 
concentrating on the Group’s investments in its most 
valuable portfolio company holdings. For details on 
the activities of the Audit and Risk Committee and the 
Group’s Valuation Committee see pages 101 to 105. 
As described on page 38, the Group maintains risk 
registers setting out mitigations in place in each case. 
The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the 
Group, as well as the relevant mitigations, are set out on 
pages 40 to 48. 
Information and financial 
reporting systems
The Group evaluates and manages significant risks 
associated with the process of preparing consolidated 
financial information by having in place systems and 
controls that ensure adequate accounting records are 
maintained and transactions are recorded accurately 
and fairly to permit the preparation of financial 
statements in accordance with IFRS. The Board approves 
the annual operating budgets and receives details of 
actual performance measured against the budget at 
each meeting. 
Further details in relation to the Group’s approach to 
the management of its business risks, and the function 
and ongoing roles and responsibilities of its internal Risk 
Council are set out on page 38.
Engaging with key stakeholders
Engaging with stakeholders is an integral part of the 
Group’s governance and decision-making procedures 
and is critical to ensuring the future success of the 
business. During 2024, the Board completed its annual 
review of the mapping of its key stakeholders, ensuring 
all its key stakeholders were captured. This process will 
be repeated again in 2025. 
Heejae Chae was re-elected as a Director at the 2024 
AGM with the support of 78.28% of shareholders voting. 
In accordance with the Code, the Group undertook a 
vote-matching exercise to understand the breakdown 
of which shareholders voted against the resolution. 
The Chair then wrote to such shareholders inviting their 
engagement on the matter in order that the Board 
may better understand the reasons why they had 
voted against the resolution. Various feedback was 
received via email and on a follow-up call with the 
Chair. The Board has taken on board such feedback 
which essentially reflected the voting policies of certain 
shareholders regarding the number and type of board 
appointments an individual Director should hold. The 
Board unanimously believes that Mr Chae continues to 
fully deliver against all of his responsibilities and is of the 
opinion that his contribution continues to add significant 
value to the Company, including as Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee. As such, the Board considers 
that it remains in the interests of all shareholders and 
other stakeholders that Mr Chae continues in his role as 
a Director of the Company and will be recommending 
the re-election of Mr Chae at the 2025 AGM. The Group 
updated the market on such shareholder engagement 
in December 2024, in accordance with Provision 4 of 
the Code. 
Further details of the Group’s engagement with its 
key stakeholders and issues that matter to such 
stakeholders are set out on pages 50 to 58. 
Annual General Meeting
Notice of the Annual General Meeting, which will be 
held on 12 June 2025 at IP Group plc, 3 Pancras Square, 
King’s Cross, London, N1C 4AG, is included with this 
Annual Report, containing details of the resolutions to 
be proposed at the meeting and explanatory notes 
on those resolutions. To ensure compliance with the 
Code, the Board proposes separate resolutions for each 
issue and proxy forms allow shareholders to vote for 
or against, or to withhold their vote, on each resolution. 
The results are announced to the market and published 
on the Group’s website after the meeting. Shareholders 
who attend the Annual General Meeting will have the 
opportunity to ask questions and all Directors are 
expected to be available to take questions. As noted 
above, questions may also be submitted at any time 
during the year to cosec@ipgroupplc.com. 
The Group’s website (www.ipgroupplc.com) is the 
primary source of information on the Group. The website 
includes an overview of the activities of the Group; 
details of its portfolio companies, and its key university 
relationships and other strategic collaborations; and 
details of all recent Group and portfolio company 
announcements.
On behalf of the Board
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
25 March 2025
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
71
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal responsibilities
The key objective of the Nomination Committee is 
to ensure that the Board comprises individuals with 
the necessary skills, knowledge, independence and 
diversity of thought and experience, to ensure that 
the Board is effective in discharging its duties and 
is independent for the purposes of the Code. The 
principal responsibilities of the Committee are to:
•	
Regularly review the size, composition and skills 
of the Board and lead the process and make 
recommendations on any changes considered 
necessary in the identification and nomination 
of new Directors, the reappointment of existing 
Directors and the appointment of members to 
the Board’s committees
•	
Ensure that there is a formal, rigorous and 
transparent procedure for the appointment of 
new Directors to the Board
•	
Assess the roles of the existing Directors in office 
to ensure there continues to be a balanced 
Board in terms of skills, knowledge, experience, 
independence and diversity and that each 
Director has and contributes sufficient time to 
effectively perform their respective roles
•	
Keep under review the leadership needs of the 
Group to enable the Group to be successful 
in its chosen fields, earn the support of key 
stakeholders, including shareholders and deliver 
on its strategy
•	
Advise the Board on succession planning 
for Directors and other senior management 
appointments, given that the Board as a whole is 
responsible for succession
•	
Oversee a pipeline for succession based solely 
on merit and with due regard to the benefits of 
diversity in all its aspects
•	
Guide the Executive Directors on the setting of 
diversity and inclusion policies, objectives, targets 
and strategies, alongside the Group’s People 
Director, and monitor the impact and outcome 
of any agreed initiatives
•	
Oversee the induction of new Directors and the 
training requirements of the Board as a whole
•	
Oversee the Group’s controls over potential 
and actual conflicts of interests of the Directors 
and senior management, including disclosure, 
authorisation and management of such conflicts 
as may be appropriate or otherwise required by 
both the Group’s Conflict of Interests Policy and 
applicable law or regulation
•	
Assist the Chair in the annual performance 
review of the Board; ensure an externally 
facilitated performance review is conducted 
at least once every three years; and oversee 
the implementation of any actions or feedback 
arising from each such review
Key activities in the year
The key areas of focus for the Committee in 
2024 included:
Board composition
•	
A review of the size and diversity of experience 
within the Board, including a review of an 
updated skills matrix of the current Board 
members as part of the medium-term Non-
executive succession plan 
Succession planning
•	
A detailed review of the medium-term 
succession plan for the Non-executive Directors 
including the Chair 
•	
A review of the Executive and senior 
management succession plans in both 2024 
and early 2025, the latter review taking into 
account changes to the structure and senior 
employees of the organisation following the H2 
reorganisation 
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
Committee membership
The Nomination Committee currently comprises the 
following independent Non-executive Directors and 
the Chair, all of whose backgrounds and experience 
are summarised on pages 61 to 63:
•	
Sir Douglas Flint (Chair)
•	
Aedhmar Hynes
•	
Heejae Chae
•	
Dr Caroline Brown
•	
Anita Kidgell
Report contents
•	
Principal responsibilities
•	
Key activities in the year
•	
Meetings and Terms of Reference
•	
Appointments
•	
Diversity and inclusion
•	
Succession planning
•	
Board effectiveness and performance review 
72	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE

Governance and I&D
•	
Receiving an update from the Group’s Inclusion and 
Diversity Project (“IDP”) on the Company’s progress 
against milestones and considering whether current 
target setting continued to be appropriate
•	
A review of the terms of reference for the Nomination 
Committee
Performance Review
•	
Overseeing the implementation of the actions 
identified during the 2023 internally facilitated 
performance review of the Board, its committees 
and each Director 
•	
Overseeing the internally facilitated review of the 
Board, its committees and each Director in 2024
Meetings and terms of reference
The Nomination Committee meets as and when 
required, or as requested by the Board, and had three 
scheduled meetings during 2024. The attendance by 
each member of the Nomination Committee at the 
scheduled meetings during 2024 is set out on page 59.
The terms of reference for the Nomination Committee 
were reviewed on 4 February 2025 and it was concluded 
that no substantive updates were required at this time. 
The Nomination Committee reviews its terms of reference 
at least annually and will propose updates where 
necessary to reflect evolving market practice applicable 
to the Company and best corporate governance.
Appointment process 
In making appointments to the Board, the Nomination 
Committee adopts a formal, rigorous and transparent 
procedure. It considers the balance, skills, knowledge, 
independence and diversity characteristics 
(including diversity of gender, social and ethnic 
backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths) and 
equal opportunity of the Board. Where relevant, and 
particularly in considering matters of succession, the 
Committee also considers the future challenges likely 
to face the business, any emerging trends that may 
affect the Group’s long-term success and any specific 
technical skills and knowledge that may be required on 
the various committees.
In addition, for appointments to the Board, the 
Nomination Committee will always assess any potential 
conflicts of interest and whether identified candidates 
have sufficient time available to devote to the role and 
meet what is expected of them effectively.
Induction process
The Group’s induction programme for new Non-
executive Directors is tailored to the needs of each 
Director, agreed with them in advance and monitored 
throughout the process to ensure each new Director 
gains a good understanding of the Group, its strategy, its 
people, its portfolio and its business. The typical process 
for an induction includes:
•	
An overview of the Group and its businesses, 
structure, functions, strategic aims, risk management 
framework and remuneration policies 
•	
Meetings with both Executive Directors, the Managing 
Partner, the Company Secretary and the other 
members of the Executive team 
•	
Meetings with both the Group’s auditor and internal 
audit function
•	
Training on key legal, regulatory and governance 
matters relevant to the Group and its policies 
•	
Meetings with some of the Group’s priority 
portfolio companies and presentations from their 
management teams on their businesses 
•	
Observing a meeting of the Valuation Committee
•	
Sessions as appropriate with the Group’s advisors, 
as well as with appropriate external governance 
specialists, to ensure the Director understands 
the responsibilities and obligations as a Director 
of a FTSE 250 company, and of the governance, 
regulatory and legislative framework within which 
the Board must operate
The appointment process to the Board is  
as follows:
Identify
Search
Mapping exercise 
of the Board’s 
existing skills, 
experience, 
knowledge and 
balance to identify 
any gaps.
Nomination 
Committee 
considers whether 
the services of an 
external search 
consultancy or 
public advertising 
are required, and 
a detailed job 
specification is 
prepared.
Identify
A diverse list of candidates is created 
and following review by the Nomination 
Committee, is distilled into a shortlist. The 
Committee requires all shortlists to be 
gender balanced and will always seek 
to include at least one candidate from 
an under-represented group in the final 
shortlist.
Interview
Appointment
Interviews with 
shortlisted 
candidates are 
carried out by the 
Chair (except for 
in respect of Chair 
or Chair designate 
candidates), 
the Senior 
Independent 
Director and at 
least two other 
Directors.
The Nomination 
Committee 
makes a 
recommendation 
to the Board and, 
if in agreement 
with the 
recommendation, 
the Board 
approves an offer 
to be made to the 
chosen candidate.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
73
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Diversity and inclusion
The Board is committed to establishing and maintaining 
a culture that attracts and retains talented people to 
deliver outstanding performance and enhance the 
success of the Group. Within that culture, the Board’s 
policy is to make appointments to the Board and senior 
management based upon merit measured against 
objective criteria, whilst recognising that diversity, 
in all its many forms, is key to introducing different 
perspectives into Board debate and decision-making 
and creating optimal balance and composition of the 
Board and the Executive team.
The Nomination Committee applies the Board’s diversity 
strategy and policy in accordance with its terms of 
reference; considering diversity in the widest possible 
sense in evaluating the composition of the Board and 
the Executive team, identifying suitable candidates 
for the Board and Executive team and overseeing the 
maintenance of a diverse pipeline for succession. 
The Board also ensures that the same rigorous 
approach is applied to roles across the wider senior 
management team.
The Group supports the diversity targets and 
recommendations of the FTSE Women Leaders Review 
(aiming to have at least one woman in the Chair or 
Senior Independent Director role and 40% female 
representation on the Board and in senior management 
roles); and the Parker Review updates issued in 2020 
and 2023.
As of 31 December 2024, the Board meets the Financial 
Conduct Authority’s Listing Rule 6.6.6R(9) target of at 
least 40% of individuals on its Board being women, at 
least one individual on the Board being from a minority 
ethnic background and at least one senior Board 
position being held by a woman. Diversity information 
for the Board, senior management and the gender split 
for the Group as a whole, as at 31 December 2024, can 
be found on pages 29 and 30. 
Given the Group’s small team, previously low turnover, 
and its focus on ensuring that every appointment is 
based on an objective, merit-based process, we have 
continued with our preference of not setting hard 
targets for gender, ethnicity or other characteristics 
as part of our recruitment processes. The Committee 
continues to aspire to the organisation being 
representative of the communities in which we operate, 
and monitors progress in this area accordingly. Hard 
targets would have been difficult in 2024 given the 
additional challenges presented following the corporate 
reorganisation we conducted this year, which involved 
a number of redundancies and an almost total freeze 
on recruitment for 2025. However, following the updated 
Parker Review guidance from 2023 and the move 
beyond a “one and done” approach to ethnic diversity, 
last year we set for the first time a target of 15% of our 
senior management team being from an ethnically-
diverse background by the end of 2027. Following the re-
organisation and considering the anticipated minimal 
level of recruitment in 2025, we do not expect to make 
any significant progress against this target in the short 
term, but will of course continue to consider it within any 
recruitment activity. We will also further review both the 
target and any progress against it as part of our regular 
review cycle towards the end of the year, as well as 
actions that may be required following such review.
The Group’s broad commitment to inclusion and 
diversity is not limited to the areas directly overseen by 
the Committee. The Committee has also been active 
in overseeing the continuation and evolution of the 
inclusion and diversity strategy for the whole Group, 
which is overseen by the Group’s Inclusion and Diversity 
Project (“IDP”), an employee-led Group which develops 
and owns the forward-looking plan to embed diversity 
within our culture.
Once again, the Committee is proud of the work 
undertaken by the IDP throughout 2024 to maintain a 
forward-looking plan of development and improvement 
actions. Both the Committee and the Board have 
received regular updates on the work of the IDP, 
monitoring progress against deliverables and ensuring 
that the Executive team are appropriately focused on 
this across all areas of the business.
Succession planning
The Nomination Committee recognises that the Group’s 
performance is highly dependent upon its ability to 
attract, recruit and retain the highest-quality people 
and that maintaining a robust succession planning 
framework is a key factor in ensuring the Group’s 
long-term success. Succession planning also mitigates 
the risk of unforeseen circumstances creating a need 
for urgent remedial action, ensuring that changes in 
Board or senior management positions are effectively 
managed, avoiding significant disruption to the Group 
and thereby ensuring that the Group can successfully 
execute its corporate strategy. 
Executive Directors
In partnership with the Group’s People Director, 
the Committee reviewed and agreed an updated 
succession plan for both Executive Directors and senior 
management early in 2024. This has been updated 
and refreshed in early 2025 to reflect changes required 
following the corporate reorganisation during H2 2024. 
The Committee noted that, consistent with its 
conclusions from previous years, one of the 
disadvantages of a small internal team is the lack 
of “bench” coverage for some of the roles. In these 
cases, the Committee noted that emergency plans 
for either internal coverage via a redesign of roles and 
responsibilities, and/or a plan to cover the roles with 
external resource for an emergency period, remained 
in place, should this be required. The Committee 
therefore remains satisfied that management focus 
on succession is sufficient to mitigate any short-term 
or emergency challenges, and that the management 
team is balancing succession and continuity 
requirements with appropriate and continued control 
over operational expenditure.
Overall, the Nomination Committee remains confident 
that the Board and Executive team are well positioned to 
deliver the Group’s strategy into 2025 and beyond.
Non-executive Directors
In June 2024, Dr Elaine Sullivan stepped down from the 
Board following her ninth year of tenure. The Committee 
had already agreed, following its review of the updated 
74	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

skills matrix after the appointment of Anita Kidgell in 
early 2023, that the Board would be able to continue to 
operate effectively without an immediate replacement 
for Dr Sullivan, given Ms Kidgell’s skill-set had mitigated 
any immediate skills gaps left following Dr Sullivan’s 
departure. No additional Directors were therefore 
appointed during the year. The Committee did however, 
as part of its annual review of the Board composition, 
recommend the reappointments of both myself and 
my colleague Heejae Chae for our third three-year 
terms, subject to annual re-election by shareholders. 
The Committee remains of the view that maintaining 
a 5:2 ratio on the Board for a period of time will allow 
for additional flexibility to identify, recruit and onboard 
candidates for the key Board positions going forward. 
However, the Committee continues to be mindful that 
the maximum nine-year appointment term of each 
of myself, Dr Caroline Brown (Audit & Risk Committee 
Chair), Heejae Chae (Remuneration Committee Chair) 
and Aedhmar Hynes (Senior Independent Director and 
Designated NED) are all coming to an end in a relatively 
short timeframe during 2027/28.
As such, through 2024, the Committee has discussed 
on several occasions the appropriate timeline and 
sequencing of the various Board appointments that 
will need to be made, including to ensure a satisfactory 
combination of continuity and effective and meaningful 
handover periods. Members of the Committee have also 
engaged on a high-level basis on this topic with some of 
the larger shareholders to seek their views, as a further 
input into the process. Following these discussions and 
considerations, a plan for orderly succession has been 
formulated, which the Committee will begin to execute 
during 2025 (with the Senior Independent Director 
leading Chair succession), allowing plenty of time for an 
orderly process and transition over the following years. 
Below senior management 
In addition to succession planning at Board and senior 
management-level, developing internal talent at all 
levels within the Group remains a continuous process. 
The Nomination Committee is responsible for ensuring 
that suitable assessment and development plans 
are in place to maximise the potential of the Group’s 
employees and that the Group has effective recruitment 
policies to continue to attract and retain a diverse mix of 
talented employees. The Committee remains confident 
that this is the case, albeit is cognisant that, following the 
reorganisation in H2 2024, and the need for continued 
control over operational expenditure, recruitment 
is likely to be relatively minimal through 2025, and 
that the focus will be on the retained employees and 
their development needs, as well as appropriate 
emergency succession plans to effectively mitigate any 
unplanned turnover.
Board effectiveness and 
performance review
In line with best practice under the Code, the Board 
carries out a review of the effectiveness of its 
performance and that of its Committees and Directors 
every year. This review is externally facilitated every 
three years with the next external performance review 
due in 2025. The 2024 review was therefore an internal 
review, and was led by the Chair, with the support of the 
Company Secretary, in line with the process set out right.
Board review process
Summary of progress against the actions 
from the 2023 Board effectiveness review 
prepared
Board members requested to complete 
questionnaires and review summary of 
progress against 2024 actions. Follow-up 
calls to go through the outputs with the 
Company Secretary were held, as necessary
The Company Secretary summarised the 
outputs of the above in reports for the Board 
and its Committees
Results were presented and discussed at 
Board and Committee meetings
Actions and priorities for 2025 were agreed, 
as set out on page 77
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
75
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Progress against 2024 actions
Set out below is the progress made in 2024 against actions identified through the 2023 internally-facilitated Board effectiveness review.
Action
Progress
Portfolio oversight
Continue to challenge and hold the Executive Directors and the wider 
investment teams to account for delivery of priority portfolio company 
2024 milestones; undertake scenario planning for various outcomes in 
key portfolio companies through 2024.
Priority company progress against milestones reported on specifically 
by the Executive Team (balance sheet) at each Board meeting. 
Scenario planning for key portfolio companies was prepared for the 
Board and challenged continuously throughout the year.
Non-executive 
sessions
Schedule additional NED-only focused sessions around Board 
meetings, in addition to NED-only dinners, to fully capitalise on the time 
everyone is all together around the Board table.
Regular NED-only sessions held during the year, both before and after 
Board and Committee meetings, which added to the richness and 
challenge of debates and discussions at the meetings themselves. 
Succession planning
Agree the staging and timetable for Non-executive Director and Chair 
succession planning through to 2027/28 and begin implementing the 
same towards the end of the year.
Timetable discussed at each Nomination Committee meeting through 
the year; agreement of a plan and execution timetable reached 
during 2024.
Board materials
Continue to evolve the structure and succinctness of Board and 
Committee papers to focus Board discussion and challenge on the 
material questions. 
The Company Secretary team worked closely with the Chair and the 
Executive Directors to significantly reduce the size of, and duplication 
within, Board and Committee papers.
Executive Committee/
Group connectivity
Seek greater participation from the wider Executive Committee 
members on ways in which the Board could add further value during its 
interactions with them and their respective teams through 2024; seek 
and respond to additional feedback and ideas through IP Connect to 
continue effective Board connectivity with the wider organisation.
Annual fireside Q&A held with the Non-executive Directors. Designated 
NED continued to attend all IP Connect meetings, including around 
the corporate reorganisation (see more on page 52). Executive team 
members attended and fully participated in the Board strategy days. 
Shareholder 
engagement and 
Board profile
Consider additional opportunities to utilise the Chair and NEDS for 
increased engagement with investors and shareholders; consider 
ways, including through investor events, the Group’s website etc. to 
highlight the individual experience of the NEDs and their strengths/the 
collective strength of the Board.
Board members attended the Group’s 2024 flagship event, as well as 
other sector-based events held through the year. The Chairman and 
Senior Independent Director held several one-to-one meetings with 
larger shareholders throughout the year.
ESG
Continue to actively oversee the Group’s commitment to and 
communication of its approach to ESG matters, including challenging 
how what we are doing compares to others in our peer group and 
aligns with external investor priorities.
The Board continued its active oversight of the Group’s approach 
to ESG, with Anita Kidgell attending ESG Committee meetings and 
reporting back to the Board on progress. The corporate reorganisation 
in H2 2024 has caused a full review of the Groups’ approach, including 
versus its peers, to ensure deployment of ESG resource is optimised, 
proportionate and fit for purpose for the Group. 
76	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Conclusion of the 2024 review 
The 2024 internal review concluded that the Board, each of its Committees and each 
of the Directors continue to operate effectively to achieve its and their objectives. All 
Board members agreed that the Board had continued to operate with a positive and 
supportive culture, enabled by a strong Chair. The collegiate nature of the Board, the 
diversity of its members and the high level of trust, openness and mutual respect at 
meetings were highlighted, as well as the significant challenge fostered by the Chair.
As part of the internal review, Board members agreed that good progress had been 
made against the Board’s 2024 priorities. Further, an agreed set of priorities for the year 
ahead has been agreed for each of the Chair and the Board. 
Key priorities for the Board through 2025 include: 
Theme
Actions
Shareholder returns
Given the persistence of the discount to NAV, 
continue to challenge management on the Group’s 
strategy around returns to shareholders including the 
mechanisms to be used, the levels and the proportion 
of realisations to be returned; oversee any resulting 
actions.
Portfolio focus
Undertake more detailed and regular reviews of the 
key portfolio companies through the year, to include 
scenario planning, and an even fuller understanding of 
the risks and opportunities presented for each.
Business model 
evaluation
Further evaluate and challenge the Group’s business 
model to identify focus areas for its evolution; oversee 
any resulting actions.
Succession 
planning and Board 
effectiveness
Continue in-year focus on succession planning to 
ensure the Board’s purpose and composition evolves 
as required and to address known succession 
requirements over the next 3 years. Such work to 
include an externally facilitated Board effectiveness 
review through Q3/4 2025 and a plan to build upon the 
outputs of this.
Director performance assessment and review
The performance of each of the Non-executive Directors is reviewed by the Chair with 
support from the Company Secretary; the performance of the Chief Executive Officer 
is reviewed by the Chair; and the performance of the Chief Financial and Operating 
Officer is reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer as part of the annual appraisal 
process. In addition to those reviews, the performance of the Executive Directors is 
reviewed by the Board on an ongoing basis. One-to-one meetings have been held 
amongst the individuals concerned and individual development plans arising from 
these meetings are now in place for the year ahead. As an integral part of these 
reviews, the time commitment required of each individual Non-executive Director is 
reviewed alongside their other commitments. I am pleased to confirm that following 
this review I am satisfied that each of our Directors is able to commit sufficient 
time to the Group to effectively discharge their role. Further, as part of the Board’s 
continued development, certain Board awareness sessions have been planned for 
2025, to include continued exposure to and interaction with portfolio companies and 
their management teams. In addition, an annual corporate governance update and 
presentations from the Group’s brokers and corporate finance advisors on shareholder 
perception, market performance (including versus the Group’s peer group), potential 
strategic opportunities, defence strategies and shareholder activism are all planned 
for 2025. 
The Chair’s performance is reviewed by the Senior Independent Director based on 
feedback from discussions with individual Directors; the resulting assessment is 
discussed with the Chair by the Senior Independent Director and actions required by 
the assessment are included in the Chair’s objectives for 2025. The Senior Independent 
Director reported back to the rest of the Board regarding this assessment and was 
pleased to confirm the Chair performed effectively during 2024.
Given each of the performance reviews found that each Director continued to 
perform, the Committee recommends that each Director should be recommended 
for re-election by shareholders at the 2025 AGM. Further details of the Directors’ skills, 
experience and expertise are set out on pages 61 to 63. 
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair of the Nomination Committee
25 March 2025
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
77
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal responsibilities
The terms of reference for the Remuneration 
Committee were reviewed and adopted by the 
Board in December 2024. The Committee will 
continue to review its terms of reference at least 
annually, and will propose updates where necessary 
or appropriate. The key responsibilities of the 
Committee are unchanged, as follows:
•	
Determine the policy for Executive Director 
remuneration
•	
Design and set the remuneration for the Chair, 
Executive Directors and senior management
•	
Review workforce remuneration and related 
policies to ensure the Group attracts and retains 
the best talent
•	
Review remuneration practice and overall costs 
to the Group
•	
Consider retirement benefits and other 
employee benefits offered
•	
Consider the engagement and independence of 
external remuneration advisors
•	
Establish the Group’s policy with respect to 
employee incentivisation schemes
The full terms of reference of the Committee 
are available on the Group’s website at 
www.ipgroupplc.com.
Committee meetings are administered and 
minuted by the Company Secretary. In addition, the 
Committee receives assistance from the CEO, CFOO 
and Group People Director who attend meetings by 
invitation, except when matters relating to their own 
remuneration are being discussed.
Committee focus and key 
activities in 2024
During 2024, the Committee continued to work to 
ensure that the implementation and outcomes 
of the Remuneration Policy agreed at our 2022 
AGM remain reasonable and aligned with both 
performance and shareholder interests. The 
Committee also undertook a robust review of 
the Remuneration Policy itself, and having initially 
determined that this review would be best supported 
by a change in external advisor, completed the 
process of appointing and embedding a new 
independent advisor in Alvarez & Marsal (“A&M”).
The Committee’s work on both in-year 
implementation of the existing policy and the 
determination of the right forward-looking approach 
was particularly complex during 2024. As set out 
on pages 10 to 15, 2024 was a successful year 
for the Group in a number of areas. In particular, 
the Committee noted the strong performance 
on exits during the year, which will underpin the 
financial position of the Group whilst the existing 
portfolio continues to mature and deliver further 
returns. The Committee also noted the continued 
emerging pipeline of new opportunities, as well as 
the successful delivery of a major cost-reduction 
exercise and the significant levels of third-party 
capital raised.
However, two of our key metrics, NAV and our share 
price, remained challenging throughout 2024. The 
Committee remains confident in the strategic 
direction of the Company, and believes that the 
management team is addressing these issues in 
the right way to deliver medium- and long-term 
shareholder value. Much of the Committee focus 
during 2024 has been on ensuring that this context 
is addressed in a balanced way when considering 
both remuneration outcomes for 2024 and an 
appropriate Remuneration Policy to drive future 
performance.
Heejae Chae
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
Committee membership
The Remuneration Committee currently comprises the 
following independent Non-executive Directors and 
the Chair, all of whose backgrounds and experience 
are summarised on pages 61 to 63:
•	
Heejae Chae (Chair)
•	
Sir Douglas Flint
•	
Dr Caroline Brown
•	
Aedhmar Hynes
•	
Anita Kidgell
Report contents
•	
Principal responsibilities
•	
Committee focus and key activities 2024
•	
Review of Remuneration Policy
•	
Remuneration at a glance
•	
Remuneration Policy 2025-27
•	
Annual report on remuneration
78	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE

It is with these factors in mind that the Committee 
considered salary levels for the Board during the year. 
As we disclosed in the 2023 report, we originally planned 
to award a small increase to both Executive and Non-
executive Directors for 2024. However, in the context of 
both performance and cost pressures, the Committee 
ultimately determined that it would be more prudent to 
hold salaries at 2023 levels. Therefore no salary or fee 
increases were awarded during the course of the 2024, 
and this approach will also be carried forward to the 
2025 review.
The same factors influenced the Committee’s 
consideration of the appropriate vesting level for the 
first Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”) awards made in 2022. 
This was considered extensively during the latter part of 
2024, in anticipation of performance levels versus the 
underpin in place for that award. To ensure outcomes 
were appropriately aligned to the shareholder 
experience, the 2022 award (and all subsequent 
awards) was subject to a robust underpin with a 
quantitative trigger.
As a result of the significant external market pressures 
which have impacted business performance over the 
three-year period, and the subsequent falls in NAV 
and below market TSR over the period, the underpin 
condition was not met. As such, and in line with the 
terms of the underpin, the Committee actively reviewed 
the vesting level for the 2022 RSP award, considering 
quantitative performance measures as well as taking 
into account a broader review of performance. As 
part of this review, the Committee noted the actions 
taken by the management team to assure long-term 
shareholder value growth, including the significant and 
sustained level of realisations, strong cash position of 
the Group, level of cash returned to shareholders and 
the strong pipeline of future opportunity. 
Taking into account the wide range of factors specific 
to this award, and after careful and balanced 
consideration, the Committee concluded that none of 
the 2022 RSP awards would vest, and they will therefore 
lapse in full.
Following year-end, the Committee considered the 
calculated Annual Incentive Scheme (“AIS”) outcome 
of 42.5% of maximum for 2024, and determined 
that it appropriately reflected and fairly balanced 
the successes delivered and continued pressure 
experienced through 2024. This will result in a payout of 
31.9% of salary for the Executive Directors, a portion of 
which will be received in deferred shares.
In addition, and throughout the year, the Committee has:
•	
Undertaken a full review of the Director’s 
Remuneration Policy, as set out in more detail below
•	
Consulted with shareholders on our intended 
approach to Remuneration Policy in advance of 
publication
•	
Considered the skills and experience of the Executive 
Directors and the wider business leadership, and 
commissioned external benchmarking in order to 
determine base salaries and total remuneration 
opportunity
•	
Reviewed the application of the Group’s 
Remuneration Policy for non-Director employees, 
including the Group’s approach to salary reviews, 
as well as individual base salaries and incentive 
scheme targets and pay-outs
•	
Engaged with employees on the subject of 
remuneration in both 2024 and early 2025 via our 
employee forum “IP Connect”
•	
Considered and approved the appropriate vesting 
level for the 2021 LTIP awards which ultimately lapsed 
in 2024, monitored potential outturns for the 2022 
RSP awards, and ultimately determined the correct 
vesting level as set out above
•	
Considered the level of the 2025 RSP awards
•	
Considered the Annual Incentive Scheme (“AIS”) 
awards and Group performance targets and out-
turns as relevant for 2023, 2024 and 2025
Review of Remuneration Policy
To ensure that our Executive Director remuneration 
remains aligned with shareholder interests through the 
next Policy cycle, during 2024 the Committee undertook 
a full review of the current Policy and alternative options 
available. This review was undertaken with the help 
of A&M, who replaced Deloitte as the independent 
Remuneration Committee Advisors in early 2024.
The review considered all of the key elements of 
remuneration, including the overall quantum (both in 
absolute terms and versus market peers), incentive mix, 
shareholding guidelines, bonus deferral mechanism, 
equity incentive structure and quantum as well as the 
structure of the underpin applied to Restricted Shares. 
As further context, we also took into account evolving 
practice in the UK market as well as Group performance 
over the last policy period, particularly reflecting 
upon the impact of the switch to restricted shares on 
behaviour, activity focus and shareholder alignment.
The Committee considered a wide range of alternative 
remuneration structure options in detail. Ultimately 
we concluded that the fundamental reasons for the 
decisions we made on structure, remuneration mix and 
the design of specific elements of the package in 2022 
remain as applicable today as they did then.
The Committee went to great lengths in 2022 
to develop and build consensus for a bespoke 
approach constructed to specifically address the 
unique remuneration challenges posed by IP Group’s 
characteristics. Principally, this included improving the 
alignment of interests through the longer investment 
and performance cycle by combining prudent base 
salary with a very low maximum bonus, and delivery of 
the vast majority of our variable remuneration through 
Restricted Shares. This model, in particular the focus 
on equity awards with a robustly operated underpin, 
directly aligns the interests of the management team 
with our long-term shareholders.
Retaining this alignment is hugely important as we 
seek to grow the business and net asset value over 
the coming Policy period. As such, and with the first 
Restricted Share awards made under the current 
structure only now reaching the point of vesting, we 
concluded that there is no compelling rationale for 
change at the current time, nor any remuneration 
structure or mix that better suits our needs.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
79
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

The table below therefore summarises the key elements of the existing Remuneration Policy and remuneration framework which we will be seeking to renew, along with a short 
summary of supporting rationale in each case. The following pages contain more detail on our approach:
Remuneration element
Policy summary
Rationale
Salary
Market competitive, benchmarked to both the lower 
half of the FTSE 250 and comparative peer group
Alignment to a mid-market level to ensure ability to attract and retain individuals 
with the experience, personal attributes and skills required to define and deliver 
the Group strategy
Pension
10% of salary (aligned to workforce)
Provision of an equitable, competitive post-retirement income to all employees 
regardless of seniority
Annual Incentive Scheme
Maximum of 75% of salary
50% of any payment over £25,000 deferred into shares 
over two years
Majority of outcome based on measurable financial 
objectives linked to strategy
Variable remuneration to recognise short-term positive outcomes which are 
aligned with shareholder interests, with the overall quantum (very low versus 
UK-listed peers) set to recognise the primarily long-term nature and potential 
asymmetry of performance outcomes within our business model
Restricted Share Plan
Maximum award of 200% of salary (CEO) or 133% of 
salary (CFOO)
Three-year vesting/Two-year hold
Quantitative underpin (see page 85)
Competitive long-term share awards, which act as the primary incentive to the 
management team and directly align the interests of management with those of 
long-term shareholders and other stakeholders
Minimum shareholding
350% of salary (CEO); or
250% of salary (CFOO); and
Two-year post cessation of employment requirement 
(see page 87)
Set at a relatively high level versus market comparators to reflect the importance 
of long-term alignment between the Executive Directors and our shareholders, 
and the potential value delivered by our use of Restricted Shares. It is intended 
that the personal wealth of the Executive Directors is ultimately inherently 
and directly linked to the performance delivered to shareholders, and the 
combination of Restricted Share Awards, a quantitative underpin and minimum 
shareholding is set with this objective in mind
80	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Restricted Share Award underpin 
The Committee noted that the underpin in place for 
the Restricted Share Plan awards made in 2022, 2023 
and 2024 is one of the most robust in place for any 
restricted share award in the UK-listed market. As part 
of the Committee’s review, due consideration was 
also given to the structure and measures contained 
within this underpin, and whether it was appropriate 
to more closely align with evolving market practice in 
this area by moving from our quantitative trigger to a 
more qualitative approach. However, the Committee 
concluded that the existing structure, combined with 
robust Committee oversight of all vesting events 
provides an important safeguard, given the overall size 
of the awards. As such, the Committee determined that 
the underpin for awards made in the coming policy 
cycle would also be carried forward unchanged. This 
can be found on page 91.
Shareholder feedback
We remain committed to maintaining open and 
transparent remuneration principles and practices. 
Therefore, as part of this Remuneration Policy review, 
we have sought feedback from both shareholders and 
proxy advisory groups which helped to inform the final 
decision. Ahead of the recommendation we reached out 
to over 65% of our register to gather feedback.
The majority of the shareholders we engaged with 
indicated their support for our proposals, including a 
number of our largest holders. They acknowledged the 
need to maintain a thoughtful and distinctive approach, 
to align our remuneration with the strategy and 
characteristics of our business, and were supportive of 
the structures we put in place in 2022.
Whilst no explicit policy changes were made as a 
result of the feedback received, the Committee is 
confident that the structure in place combined with 
robust and active management of remuneration 
outcomes (including the quantitative underpin and 
robust annual review of RSP vesting) means it can 
manage remuneration in line with the best interests of 
shareholders over the forthcoming policy period.
As such, we believe that the policy remains appropriate 
for our distinctive business model and in the best 
interests of our Company and shareholders. We 
therefore recommend that shareholders vote in favour 
of the new policy.
Employee engagement
In February 2024, Aedhmar Hynes (our Designated 
NED) and I directly engaged with our employee forum 
“IP Connect” on the subject of Executive remuneration. 
We repeated this exercise in early 2025, as part of 
our commitment to ensure that this direct dialogue 
with employees takes place at least once each year, 
enabling our employees to have the opportunity to both 
challenge our direction and inform our decision-making 
process.
The input provided by IP Connect informed our decisions 
relating to both our overall policy and our approach to 
the determination of outcomes for 2024. Once again, 
we were encouraged by the level of engagement and 
quality of discussion. It was also reassuring to find that 
our overall strategy for Executive remuneration (outlined 
in the Policy) remains well understood, and is considered 
by employees to be fair, equitable and reasonable in the 
context of the remuneration we offer elsewhere in the 
business.
Structure of this report
The following pages contain our proposed 
Remuneration Policy in full. This section also contains 
a summary of how we intend to implement the policy 
during 2025 and detailed disclosure of outcomes in 
respect to 2024, summarised in “Remuneration At A 
Glance”. We have included additional information on our 
bonus metrics for 2024 and 2025, in response to proxy 
agency and shareholder feedback.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
81
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

2024 Single Figure
Greg Smith 
CEO
David Baynes 
CFOO
Base  
salary
£546k £374k
Annual  
bonus
£174k
42.50% of maximum
£119k
42.50% of maximum
Share 
based 
incentive1 
£0
0% of original award
£0
0% of original award
1	
% 202 1LTIP award, % 2022 RSP award
Variable Pay, Awards & Outcomes 2024
Remuneration outcomes versus policy 2024
Directors’ shareholdings
Base pay and total package
Base salary increase
2025 maximum 
implementation
April  
2025
April  
2024
Greg  
Smith
0%
0%
David 
Baynes
0%
0%
UK 
employees
(Average lfl) 1.4%
6.2%
David Baynes
Greg Smith
£772k
£544k
Base salary
Annual bonus (AIS)
Share-based incentive
Benefits
Pension
David
Baynes
Greg
Smith
£1,092k
£409.5k
£546k
£498k
£280.8k
£374.4k
£2,047.5k
£1,153.2k
Base salary
Max. AIS
RSP grant
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
RSP vested %
(2022 awards)
RSP policy max
AIS 2024 outcome
AIS policy max
Greg Smith
David Baynes
David Baynes
Greg Smith
4,023,494
817,519
2,798,172
1,970,691
736,319
1,310,039
Shares owned including shares 
which have vested but not been 
released which have been adjusted 
for tax at 47%
Outstanding unvested holdings, 
adjusted for tax at 47%
Minimum shareholding requirement
(at 47.50p per share, three-month 
rolling average at 31/12/2024)
82	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
REMUNERATION AT A GLANCE.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

This section sets out the Company’s policy on the 
remuneration of its Executive and Non-executive 
Directors (the “Policy”), which will become effective, for 
a period of up to three years, subject to approval by 
shareholders at our AGM on 12June 2025.
As described in the Remuneration Statement, our Policy 
remains consistent with that introduced in 2022, with no 
changes proposed for the forthcoming policy period. 
This approach remains aligned to our long-term value 
creation philosophy. We have engaged widely with 
shareholders throughout the renewal process to ensure 
that shareholder input was taken into account.
The basis for our approach to remuneration also 
remains consistent with that established in 2022, which 
followed a comprehensive review of the structure from 
first principles. In summary, our objective continues 
to be to maximise the long-term alignment of the 
management team and our shareholders, primarily 
through reinforcement of the culture and mindset of 
ownership. Further, we are seeking to align management 
incentive outcomes with the long term, asymmetric 
nature of our investments, whilst remaining sensitive to 
the requirements of our investors and other stakeholders 
alike. 
To achieve these objectives the Committee continues 
to believe that the Group requires a remuneration 
structure that has incentive levers covering both the 
short term (one to three years) and the longer term 
(three to five years), weighted in proportion to their 
relative importance in driving ultimate returns for 
long-term shareholders. These are the only relevant 
remuneration levers for our Executive Directors, but for 
other key members of the wider management team 
this is supplemented by incentives directly aligned with 
those specific portfolio assets potentially over an even 
longer term (five to ten-plus years). 
Remuneration Policy table
The table below sets out the key components of the Policy for Executive Directors’ remuneration. Our overall aim is to ensure that we retain individuals with the personal attributes, 
skills and experience required to deliver the Group’s strategy, as follows:
Component
Purpose and link to strategy
How this component of remuneration operates
Maximum opportunity
Performance metrics
Salary
To provide an appropriate 
level of fixed cash income.
Base salaries will be set by the Committee taking into 
account a range of factors, including but not limited 
to:
•	
scale, scope and responsibility of the role, and the 
performance of both the individual and the Group
•	
market data for similar roles in companies of 
comparable size and complexity
•	
impact of salary increases on total remuneration
Salary levels are reviewed in April each year
There is no prescribed 
maximum annual salary.
Annual salary increases 
for Executive Directors 
will not normally exceed 
the average increase 
awarded to other UK-
based employees, unless 
the Committee considers 
there are exceptional 
circumstances which mean 
this is appropriate.
Not applicable
Pension
To provide a competitive 
post-retirement benefit in 
a way that manages the 
overall cost to the Group.
Contribution to Group Pension Plan, a personal 
pension plan of the relevant Executive’ Director’s 
choosing or an equivalent cash alternative.
The maximum pension 
is aligned to the rate 
available to the wider 
workforce (currently 10% of 
salary).
Not applicable
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
83
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Component
Purpose and link to strategy
How this component of remuneration operates
Maximum opportunity
Performance metrics
Benefits
To provide a competitive 
and appropriate benefits 
package to assist 
individuals in carrying out 
their duties effectively.
Ongoing benefits typically comprise, but are not 
limited to, health and travel insurance, income 
protection and life assurance and may also comprise 
a car benefit (or cash equivalent). Executives are also 
provided with telecoms and computing equipment 
needed to perform their duties.
Executive Directors may also participate in any all-
employee share plans that may be operated by the 
Group from time to time on the same terms as other 
employees.
Additional benefits may be provided in certain 
circumstances if considered appropriate and 
reasonable by the Committee, such as when required 
on recruitment. This may include relocation or other 
expatriation benefits, allowances or other benefits. 
Executive Directors may also choose to participate 
in Group salary sacrifice arrangements as and when 
offered at their own discretion.
The cost of benefits provided 
changes in accordance 
with market conditions and 
will, therefore, determine 
the maximum amount that 
would be paid in the form 
of benefits under the Policy. 
There is, therefore, no overall 
maximum opportunity under 
this component of the Policy.
Additional benefits, e.g. 
relocation, shall not ordinarily 
exceed 25% of base salary, 
other than in exceptional 
circumstances at the 
discretion of the Committee.
Maximum awards under all-
employee share plans would 
be subject to the prevailing 
statutory limit.
Not applicable
Annual 
Incentive 
Scheme 
(“AIS”)
To provide a simple, 
competitive, performance-
linked annual incentive 
mechanism that supports 
our strategic objectives of 
long-term equity ownership 
and value creation 
and aligns the interests 
of management and 
shareholders.
The AIS is reviewed annually prior to the start of each 
financial year to ensure the detailed performance 
measures and weightings are appropriate 
and continue to support the business strategy. 
Performance targets are set at or around the start of 
each financial year.
Actual AIS amounts are determined via a two-stage 
process. Firstly, performance against the agreed 
metrics is assessed. Secondly, the Committee reviews 
these results in the context of underlying business 
performance and the Group’s financial position and 
may adjust the stage one outcome at its discretion.
Awards will typically be payable 50% in cash and 50% 
in IP Group shares granted under the IP Group plc 
Share Plan, over a minimum bonus amount which will 
be settled solely in cash. The Deferred Share award 
is made in the form of conditional awards of shares 
or nil-cost options (or equivalent at the Committee’s 
discretion) and is subject to further time-based 
vesting over two years (50% after year one and 50% 
after year two). The Committee has discretion to 
adjust the percentage split between cash and shares 
and will set the minimum bonus amount each year, 
below which awards will be settled solely in cash. 
Malus and clawback provisions apply (see page 86). 
The maximum annual level 
of award for Executive 
Directors is 75% of salary.
Specific targets and weightings may vary 
from year to year in accordance with 
strategic priorities but may include targets 
relating to:
•	
Net Asset Value (“NAV”) per share
•	
Other in-year financial performance 
metrics (such as realisations or capital 
raised); and
•	
appropriate non-financial measures 
where such metrics are strategically 
important (and aligned with long-term 
value creation)
A higher weighting will normally be given 
to Group financial metrics.
The AIS is a discretionary plan and the 
Committee retains the discretion to adjust 
targets for any exceptional events that 
may occur during the year, and to adjust 
any formulaic outcome to reflect overall 
business or individual performance or any 
other reason considered appropriate.
The performance measures for 2025 are 
set out on page 91.
84	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Component
Purpose and link to strategy
How this component of remuneration operates
Maximum opportunity
Performance metrics
Restricted 
Shares
To provide market 
competitive long-term 
share awards which 
align the interests of 
management and 
shareholders.
Awards of shares which will normally vest after 
a period of three years, subject to review by the 
Committee of performance against an underpin.
After vesting, shares are subject to a further two-year 
holding period.
Awards of Restricted Shares will be granted under the 
rules of the IP Group plc Share Plan, and will typically 
comprise conditional awards of shares in IP Group 
(although instruments with similar economic effect 
may be used if considered appropriate).
Malus and clawback provisions apply to every award 
(see section on page 86). 
The maximum award that 
may be made to the CEO 
in respect of any financial 
year of the Company is 200% 
of salary per annum, and 
the maximum award that 
may be made to any other 
Executive Director is 133% of 
salary per annum.
Awards will be subject to a performance 
underpin measured over a three-year 
period. This is set for each individual award 
by the Committee, and will be based 
around the Group’s key financial and/or 
strategic measures.
The underpin for the awards to be made in 
2025 is set out on page 91. The Committee 
intends that a similar structure will be used 
for any awards granted in 2026 and/or 
2027, but reserves the discretion to adjust 
the underpin criteria for future awards if it 
deems this to be appropriate.
If any of the underpin criteria is not met, 
the Committee will consider whether it 
would be appropriate to scale back the 
number of shares that vest (including 
to nil).
In addition to the fixed underpin criteria, 
the Committee also has general discretion 
to adjust vesting levels if it believes this will 
better reflect the underlying performance 
of the individual or the Company over the 
vesting period or where the outcome is not 
appropriate in the context of unforeseen 
or unexpected circumstances.
Notes to the Policy table
The Committee reserves the right to make any remuneration payments and payments for loss of office (including exercising any discretions available to it in connection with 
such payments) notwithstanding that they are not in line with the 2025 Remuneration Policy where the terms of the payment were agreed (i) before the 2025 Remuneration 
Policy came into effect, provided that the terms of the payment were consistent with the shareholder-approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy in force at the time they were 
agreed; or (ii) at a time when the relevant individual was not a Director of the Company and, in the opinion of the Committee, the payment was not in consideration for the 
individual becoming a Director of the Company. For these purposes “payments” includes the Committee satisfying awards of variable remuneration and, in relation to an award 
over shares, the terms of the payment are “agreed” at the time the award is granted. 
The Committee reserves the right to make minor amendments to the Policy, for regulatory, exchange control, tax or administrative purposes or to take account of a change in 
legislation, without seeking shareholder approval.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
85
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Malus and clawback provisions
The Committee has discretion to exercise the following 
malus and clawback provisions in respect of the AIS and 
the RSP in certain circumstances. These circumstances 
include: serious misconduct by a participant; material 
misstatement of financial results; payments based 
on erroneous or misleading data; serious reputational 
damage; material failure of risk management; and 
material corporate failure.
In these circumstances, the Committee may:
•	
claw back the value of any cash amount paid or 
Deferred Share award vested and/or cancel the 
vesting of any Deferred Share award, for a period of 
up to three years following the date of the relevant 
award or payment.
•	
reduce the number of shares in respect of an 
unvested Restricted Share award and/or claw back 
any shares which have vested for a period of up to 
five years following the date of award.
Share and incentive plan discretions
The Committee will operate the Restricted Shares and 
Deferred Share awards in accordance with the rules of 
the IP Group plc Share Plan, this Policy and the Listing 
Rules where relevant. Awards may:
•	
have any underpins applicable to them amended 
or substituted by the Committee if the Committee 
considers that an amended or substituted underpin 
is reasonable, appropriate and not materially less 
difficult to satisfy than when it was originally set
•	
incorporate the right to receive an amount (in cash 
or additional shares) equal to the value of dividends 
which would have been paid on the shares under 
an award that vest, up to the time of release. This 
amount may be calculated assuming that the 
dividends have been reinvested in the Company’s 
shares on a cumulative basis
•	
be adjusted in the event of any variation of the 
Company’s share capital or any demerger, delisting, 
special dividend or other event that may affect the 
value of the Company’s shares
Approach to recruitment 
remuneration
The Committee will apply the Policy for any new 
Executive Director recruited to the Board in respect 
of all elements of forward-looking remuneration. The 
maximum level of variable remuneration will be within 
the usual maxima as set out in the Policy table (i.e. 75% 
of salary under the Annual Incentive Scheme and 200% 
or 133% of salary, as determined by their position under 
the Restricted Share Plan). 
The Committee retains flexibility to provide benefits in 
kind, pensions and other allowances, such as relocation, 
education and tax equalisation, required in order to 
recruit the intended candidate.
On hiring an external candidate, the Committee may 
make awards to buy out remuneration arrangements 
forfeited on leaving a previous employer. In doing so, 
the Committee will seek to structure buyout awards 
on a comparable basis to awards forfeited, taking into 
account relevant factors including any performance 
conditions attached to these awards, the form in which 
they were granted (e.g. cash or shares) and the time 
frame of awards. It is intended that the value awarded 
would be no higher than, in the Committee’s opinion, the 
expected value of the forfeited awards. 
Similarly, the policy for a new Chair or new Non-
executive Director would be to apply the same 
remuneration elements as apply to the existing Chair or 
Non-executive Directors under the Policy, as set out in 
the section on page 87.
In addition to the above principles, the following 
additional considerations may be applied as 
appropriate depending on the circumstances:
•	
Phasing of salary levels for new appointments 
over time
•	
In the case of internal promotion, any existing 
elements arising from an individual’s previous role 
will continue to be honoured under the Policy, even 
if they may not otherwise be consistent with the 
policy prevailing when the commitment is fulfilled. 
This would include, if applicable, the retention of 
any interests under a Long-Term Incentive Carry 
Scheme (or similar) awarded prior to becoming 
an Executive Director. However, no new allocations 
would be made
•	
In the case of promotion to Executive Director 
following an acquisition or other business 
combination, the Committee may permit equity-
based incentive arrangements to continue in force 
if they can be “rolled-up” into awards over IP Group 
shares, provided the performance and vesting 
conditions are considered appropriate
•	
In the case of the recruitment of an executive at a 
time of the year when it would be inappropriate or 
not possible to provide a Restricted Share award 
for that year (for instance, due to price sensitive 
information), the quantum in respect of the months 
employed during the year may be transferred to and 
amalgamated with the subsequent year’s award, if 
considered reasonable to do so by the Committee
Loss of office payments policy
Executive Directors have service contracts that contain 
a contractual notice period of six months by either party. 
Executive Directors’ service contracts do not contain any 
predetermined provisions for compensation in the event 
of early termination. When determining termination 
payments, the Committee takes into account a 
variety of factors, including individual and Company 
performance, mitigation of loss (for example, through 
new employment) and the relevant Director’s length of 
service. 
In the event that a contract is to be terminated, any 
payment in lieu of notice will be based on what would 
have been earned by way of salary over the notice 
period. Such payments to the Executive Director may 
be staged over the notice period, with appropriate 
consideration of mitigation. 
All awards under the Group’s AIS are discretionary. 
Should an Executive Director leave (or be under notice) 
during the financial year, no AIS award in respect of 
that year would typically be receivable. However, if the 
individual is a good leaver, they may remain eligible 
for an AIS award, subject to time pro-rating for the 
proportion of the year served and assessment of 
performance undertaken at the normal time following 
86	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

year end. Any AIS earned for the year may be paid 
wholly in cash at the discretion of the Committee.
On cessation of employment, the treatment of 
subsisting share awards would be in accordance with 
the IP Group plc Share Plan rules. 
Unvested Deferred Share awards will normally lapse, 
unless the individual is a good leaver, in which case they 
will remain entitled to awards which will normally vest 
according to the original timescale. 
Unvested Restricted Share awards would normally 
lapse. Where the individual is a good leaver, awards 
will usually be reduced on a pro-rata basis to take 
into account the length of the vesting period which 
has elapsed. Vesting and release would normally 
occur according to the original timescale and criteria, 
including the Committee’s assessment of the underpin 
and remaining subject to any applicable holding period. 
Post-cessation shareholding requirements would apply 
as described right.
For the purposes of the provisions above, a “good 
leaver” includes those individuals leaving due to death, 
disability, injury, ill health, transfer of the employing 
entity outside of the Group or any other reason at the 
Committee’s discretion. 
Malus/clawback provisions would continue to apply as 
described in the section above.
The Committee reserves the right to make any other 
payments in connection with a Director’s cessation 
of office or employment where the payments are 
made in good faith in discharge of an existing legal 
obligation, (or by way of damages for breach of such 
an obligation) or by way of a compromise or settlement 
of any claim arising in connection with the cessation of 
a Director’s office or employment. Any such payments 
may include but are not limited to paying any fees for 
outplacement assistance and/or the Director’s legal or 
professional advice fees in connection with his or her 
cessation of office or employment. Incidental expenses 
may also be payable where appropriate.
Non-executive Directors have letters of appointment 
that are terminable on three-months’ notice by 
either party.
Change of control
In the event of a change of control, Restricted Share 
awards would vest to the extent determined by the 
Committee, and normally reduced on a pro-rata basis 
to take into account the length of the vesting period 
which has elapsed and the Committee’s assessment 
of the underpin. The Committee may allow Directors 
to exchange their awards over Company shares for 
awards in shares of the acquiring company, provided 
that the terms of the offer allow this.
Any Deferred Share awards will vest in full upon a 
change of control.
Shareholding policy
Executive Directors are subject to a shareholding 
requirements policy, under which they are expected 
to build up and maintain a minimum shareholding 
of 350% of salary for the Chief Executive Officer, 
and 250% of salary for all other Executive Directors. 
Departing Executive Directors will normally be required 
to retain shares following the date of cessation of 
their employment under the Group’s post-cessation 
shareholding guidelines. This policy came into effect on 
1 January 2019 and applies to any shares vesting from 
Company incentive plans following this date. The policy 
operates as follows:
•	
The post-cessation shareholding shall be 100% of the 
shareholding guideline that applied at the date of 
cessation, or, if lower, the actual holding excluding 
personal investment
•	
The holding determined at the date of leaving 
shall apply for a period of 24 months, on a tapered 
straight-line basis, reducing to nil over this period
•	
Shares that are no longer subject to performance 
conditions, such as Deferred Share awards or vested 
Restricted Share awards in the holding period, shall 
count towards the guidelines (on a net of assumed 
tax basis)
•	
The Committee shall have the discretion to operate 
the policy flexibly and may waive part or all of 
the requirement, for example in compassionate 
circumstances
Provisions are in place to support the enforcement of 
this policy using the Company’s EBT. 
Chair and Non-executive 
Director remuneration
The Committee sets the remuneration of the Chair.
A Committee of the Board comprising the Chair and 
the Executive Directors sets the remuneration of the 
Non-executive Directors. Fees will comprise a base 
fee, with additional fees payable for other duties 
such as chair of a Committee or for being the Senior 
Independent Director or the Designated Non-executive 
Director for workforce engagement. Each Non-executive 
Director is also entitled to reimbursement of necessary 
travel, overnight accommodation (if applicable) 
and other expenses, including a tax gross-up where 
applicable. Non-executive Directors do not participate in 
any of the Group’s variable incentive schemes and are 
not eligible to join the Group’s pension schemes.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
87
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Illustration of the application of the Policy
Illustrative values and composition of the Executive Directors’ remuneration packages for the year ending 31 December 2025 under a range of scenarios are set out in 
the charts below.
Chief Executive Officer
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Minimum
Target
Maximum
Maximum +
share price
growth
23%
21%
£2.65m
41%
15%
29%
£2.1m
52%
19%
32%
£1.9m
58%
11%
100%
£0.6m
 
Key
  Fixed remuneration
  Annual variable remuneration
Chief Financial Officer
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Minimum
Target
Maximum
Maximum +
share price
growth
29%
17%
£1.44m
35%
20%
35%
£1.19m
42%
24%
39%
£1.05m
47%
13%
100%
£0.41m
  Long-term variable remuneration
  Share price appreciation
The basis of calculation for the previous graphs and key assumptions used are as follows:
Minimum
Target
Maximum
Maximum with 50% 
share price growth
Fixed elements of remuneration
Contracted base salary with effect from 1 April 2025 
Estimated cash cost to the Company of benefits 
and pension contributions received under the 
Remuneration Policy
AIS (pay-out as percentage of maximum opportunity)
0%
50%
100%
100%
RSP (vesting as percentage of maximum opportunity)
0%
100%
100%
100% plus 50% share 
price growth
88	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Development of Remuneration Policy
Consideration of pay and conditions for the wider Group: The components of pay across the Group’s UK staff are broadly similar. A significant component of long-term incentive 
for senior employees, primarily those in the investment teams and excluding the Executive Directors, is in the form of the Group’s Long-Term Incentive Carry Scheme (“LTICS”) or 
similar historical arrangements.
The Committee considers general pay and employment conditions of all employees within the Group and is sensitive to these, to prevailing market and economic conditions 
and to governance trends when assessing the level of salaries and remuneration packages of the Executive Directors. From a practical perspective, the Group only has around 
70 members of staff and, as a result, the Committee currently has the ability to review remuneration levels and changes thereto across the Group as a whole when considering 
base salary increases, bonus maxima and award pay-outs for the Executive Directors. The Committee has also been involved in key decisions around remuneration concerning 
all employees.
Engagement with our shareholders: The Committee is committed to an ongoing dialogue with shareholders and seeks to consult with its significant shareholders and the 
various proxy advisory groups when considering any major changes to remuneration arrangements. As part of the renewal of this Policy, the Group invited feedback from 
four proxy advisory groups and over 65% of our shareholder register prior to publication. All feedback is used to guide the Committee in its finalisation of the remuneration 
arrangements and their implementation. 
Differences between the Policy and that applied to employees more generally
The components of remuneration set out in the Policy table for Executive Directors are also available to the Group’s employees and, other than as set out below, differ only in 
award maxima. The benefits package is typically available to all UK members of staff following completion of a probationary period, with a broadly equivalent package being 
offered to overseas staff unless local market conditions or norms dictate otherwise. All permanent UK staff with over three months service before year end are eligible for an 
award under the AIS in that year, with similar arrangements for overseas staff.
The key differences between the Policy and that applied to employees generally are:
1.	
Awards under the RSP are only made to a limited number of the Group’s more senior employees; and
2.	 In common with many of our comparator companies, we operate a Long-Term Incentive Carry Scheme for employees, excluding Executive Directors. Participation in 
this scheme is by invitation only, with invitations extended to those employees whose roles include a significant direct impact on the development of underlying portfolio 
companies. The objective of the LTICS is to give employees the equivalent of a “founder’s stake” in the portfolio companies that they help to find, create and build, by offering 
them the opportunity to participate in the eventual returns from the Group’s portfolio that are in excess of the original capital invested by the Group and after taking account 
of an annualised hurdle return. We believe that this will align our employees directly with the long-term returns achieved on the specific assets, and thus maximise the overall 
returns to our shareholders. No allocations of this kind will be made to Executive or Non-executive Directors
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
89
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Adherence to Corporate Governance Code principles
When considering the renewal of the Remuneration Policy, its operation for the forthcoming year, and outcomes for 2024, the Committee took into consideration the following 
principles set out in the 2018 Corporate Governance Code.
Clarity
•	
The Company seeks to provide full transparency to shareholders on the operation of the Remuneration Policy, including prospective disclosure of 
our NAV target range under the AIS
•	
The Committee encourages frequent and open dialogue on Executive Director remuneration with shareholders and, during the triennial review 
process, undertook significant consultation with advisors, shareholders, proxy advisors and other stakeholders to ensure the proposed approach 
remains optimised
Simplicity
•	
Our ongoing remuneration arrangements for Executive Directors, including the AIS, are simple in nature and well understood by participants and 
shareholders and other stakeholders, including our employees 
•	
Our Restricted Share Plan is a simple and effective long-term incentive structure, which directly aligns the interests of the management team and 
long-term shareholders
•	
Incentive arrangements are cascaded down through the Group and provide alignment and overall simplicity in our approach to remuneration. All 
employees participate in the AIS (with additional components based on team and/or individual objectives for non-Director employees), and the 
RSP is extended to senior managerial levels and roles which are expected to have a material financial impact on the Group’s outcomes 
•	
The Committee continuously reviews and challenges the Group’s wider remuneration arrangements and will continue to do so in order to ensure 
that this principle continues to be appropriately met
Risk
•	
Under both the AIS and RSP, discretion may be applied where formulaic outturns are not considered reflective of overall business or individual 
performance or for any other reason considered appropriate by the Committee 
•	
Deferral of a proportion of AIS awards, our RSP holding periods and our higher than usual minimum shareholding requirement for Executive 
Directors (which has not yet been met) including a two-year post-cessation shareholding requirement provide a strong link to the ongoing 
performance of the business and the experience of our shareholders 
•	
Malus and clawback provisions apply to all AIS and RSP awards, as well as our legacy LTIP awards and the awards made under the LTICS scheme
Predictability
•	
Our Remuneration Policy contains details of the maximum opportunities and pre-determined target ranges under our AIS and RSP, with actual 
outcomes dependent on performance
Proportionality
•	
We operate a performance-based philosophy with a focus on the long term 
•	
Our performance measures under the AIS and RSP underpin, including the use of NAV measures in both, are selected based on their alignment to 
Company strategy and shareholder experience 
•	
The Committee’s ability to apply discretion ensures appropriate outturns in the context of long-term Company performance 
•	
The focus on the long-term within our remuneration approach, including the delivery of a significant proportion of our incentives in the form 
of Company shares and the use of a long-term carried interest scheme for non-Director employees, provides significant alignment between 
employees’ and Executive Directors’ remuneration outcomes and long-term Company performance
Alignment to 
culture
•	
	All employees are entitled to participate in the pension scheme and the SAYE scheme. Executive Director participation in these schemes is on the 
same terms as for other employees 
•	
Strong individual and Company performance is incentivised and recognised through our AIS and, for our more senior employees, the RSP (and 
previously the LTIP).
90	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
REMUNERATION POLICY 2025.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

For 2025, the Remuneration Policy will be implemented 
as set out below.
Salary
Last year, the average increase for the wider workforce 
was 6.2% (including both inflation and promotion 
increases). This reflects our continued investment in this 
area to ensure that our salary levels remain competitive, 
reflecting the importance of attracting and retaining a 
high-quality team as part of our business model.
We reported last year that the Executive Directors 
would receive salary increases in 2024 of 4.0% each. 
However, following the publication of that report, and in 
recognition of prudent cost management in challenging 
market conditions, it was agreed to hold salaries at the 
2023 level and therefore no increase was ultimately 
applied in 2024.
Given our ongoing focus on both cost and performance 
in the context of a difficult market, we are also intending 
to hold salaries at current levels at the 2025 review. As 
such, the salaries of the Executive Directors will remain at 
current levels, as shown below: 
2024/25 
base 
salary
2024/25 
base 
salary
Increase 
%
Greg Smith (CEO)
£546,000
£546,000
0%
David Baynes (CFOO)
£374,400
£374,400
0%
All other employees other than the most junior will also 
forgo any salary increase in 2025. The overall average 
increase for the wider workforce is expected to be 
around 1.4%.
Retirement and other benefits
Retirement and other benefits will continue to be in 
line with the levels stated in the Remuneration Policy 
table. Pension benefits for both Executive Directors will 
remain aligned with the wider workforce, with employer 
contributions of up to 10% of salary.
Annual Incentive Scheme (“AIS”)
The maximum AIS opportunity will remain at 75% of 
base salary for both Executive Directors, in line with the 
Remuneration Policy.
As such, 40% of the 2025 AIS will be based upon 
Group NAV per share growth, which in the view of the 
Committee represents the most appropriate leading 
indicator of underlying business performance. The 
conservative approach to portfolio valuation, set out 
in more detail on page 102 underpins the Committee’s 
faith in this measure. This element will be awarded at 
25% of the maximum level provided a minimum level of 
audited NAV per share of 102.6p is achieved by the end 
of the year, and will be awarded in full if audited NAV per 
share exceeds 112.4p.
The remaining 60% of the 2025 AIS will be based on 
other in-year financial metrics, including the level of 
realisations achieved from the portfolio, access to 
third-party capital and reducing the discount between 
NAV per share and our share price. These objectives 
support long-term, sustainable growth. Targets for these 
elements of bonus will be disclosed retrospectively in 
the 2025 Annual Report. 
For 2025, there will be no explicit ESG target. This change 
does not reflect a reduced focus on impact, which 
remains a key part of our strategy as set out throughout 
this report. Rather, the change is a reflection of our 
drive to simplify and focus our business on the primary 
commercial outcomes, as measured by our other 
intended AIS objectives.
Targets for all AIS measures are considered by the 
Committee to be aligned to strategy and appropriately 
stretching, especially in light of the current economic 
climate and 2024 performance. However, and in line with 
the Remuneration Policy, the Committee may adjust any 
2025 outcome to take into account overall business or 
individual performance or any other factors it considers 
appropriate.
Restricted Share Plan 
The Committee intends to make RSP awards to Executive 
Directors at the normal level set out in the Remuneration 
Policy, being 200% of base salary for the CEO and 133% 
of base salary for the CFOO. As has been the case for 
each award, the Committee will carefully monitor both 
share price and performance in the lead-up to making 
these awards, and will adjust the final award level if 
appropriate or necessary to do so.
Vesting of the 2025 awards will take place over a three-
year period commencing on 1 April 2025. Any RSP awards 
that vest will be subject to a further two-year holding 
period. Vesting will be subject to a financial underpin, 
such that NAV per share at the end of Financial Yar 2027 
must be no lower than 100% of NAV per share at the 
end of Financial Year 2024, after making appropriate 
adjustments for dividends and any other distributions.
The Committee will also monitor qualitative 
performance to ensure that Executive Directors are not 
rewarded where the Committee considers there to have 
been a failure of performance. This will include a serious 
breach of regulation, failure to sufficiently progress 
against ESG or impact objectives, material reputational 
damage and gross misconduct. In the event of any 
underpin condition not being met, the Committee will 
review the number of RSP awards which are due to vest, 
and may reduce (in full or in part) the number of shares 
that ultimately vest. In making this determination, the 
Committee will also take into account the need to avoid 
windfall gains.
Chair and Non-executive Directors
With a small Board, the Group relies heavily upon a deep 
level of commitment from the Chair and all of the Non-
executive Directors. The Chair and each Non-executive 
Director serves on multiple Committees as well as the 
Board itself.
As described earlier, both the Chair and the Non-
executive Directors chose to forgo the fee increases of 
4.0% for 2024 which had been published in last year’s 
report.
For the same reasons there will be no increase in 
2025, with our Non-executive Director fee remaining at 
£57,500, and the Chair fee at £227,000. The additional fee 
for Committee chair and other senior roles will remain at 
£10,000. There remains no fee payable for membership 
of a Board Committee.
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
91
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2025
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Single figure for total remuneration (audited)
The following table sets out the single figure for total remuneration for Directors for the financial years ended 31 December 2024 and 2023.
Base salary/
fees1
Benefits2
Retirement 
benefits3
Total fixed
Annual bonus 
(“AIS”)4
Share-based 
incentives5
Total variable
Total
All £000s 
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
Greg Smith
546
541
3
3
49
48
599
592
174
103
-
70
174
173
773
765
David Baynes6
374
371
8
78
34
33
417
412
119
70
-
67
119
137
536
549
Sir Douglas Flint 
227
218
–
–
–
–
227
218
–
–
–
–
–
–
227
218
Dr Elaine Sullivan7
26
55
–
–
–
–
26
55
–
–
–
–
–
–
26
55
Dr Caroline Brown
78
75
–
–
–
–
78
75
–
–
–
–
–
–
78
75
Aedhmar Hynes
78
75
–
21
–
–
78
96
–
–
–
–
–
–
78
96
Heejae Chae
78
66
–
–
–
–
78
66
–
–
–
–
–
–
78
66
Anita Kidgell
58
53
–
–
–
–
58
53
–
–
–
–
–
–
58
53
1	
Base salary/fees represent each Director’s contractual entitlement during the financial year in question, noting that the Group’s salary year runs from 1 April to 31 March.
2	 Travel costs for Non-executive Directors are reimbursed with any tax due settled directly with HMRC, and a consumable expenses payment of £26 (net) per month is paid to all employees, Executive 
and Non-executive Directors to cover the additional costs of occasional homeworking.
3	 Retirement benefits include payments made to defined contribution schemes on behalf of the Directors or the value of a cash equivalent, if applicable. The pension available to the Executive Directors 
is aligned to that available for the employee population. 
4	 AIS executive bonus outturn was 42.5% of the maximum for 2024, equating to 31.9% of base salary, with further detail provided in the table on page 93. Consistent with the Remuneration Policy, the first 
£25,000 will be paid in cash and thereafter 50% will be paid in cash and 50% deferred into shares over two years.
5	 For 2024, the “Share Based Incentives” section contains the combined figure for both the 2021 LTIP award and the 2022 RSP award, both of which lapsed in full. This is because the date of the final 
quantitative vesting measure for both the 2021 LTIP and the 2022 RSP underpin occurred during the 2024 Financial Year. 
6	 David Baynes receives an annual car allowance or equivalent thereof of £12,000. He also participated in our Electric Vehicle salary sacrifice scheme during the year, sacrificing gross salary of £10,368 
over the period, and has use of an electric vehicle with a taxable benefit of £998 in 2024. The benefits figure reported for David Baynes includes all of these amounts in aggregate, in addition to the 
value of his other benefits.
7	 Dr Elaine Sullivan stepped down as a Director on 13 June 2024.
8	 The value shown has been restated from the equivalent figure in last year’s report to reflect an update in the calculation.
92	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Additional disclosures for single figure for total remuneration table
Annual Incentive Scheme
The targets for the 2024 AIS for Executive Directors were set in line with the Statement 
of Implementation for 2024 laid out in the 2023 Directors’ Remuneration Report. That is, 
AIS outcomes for 2024 have been determined based upon the following mix of targets:
•	
40% on achievement of the targeted levels for the Group’s audited NAV per share
•	
25% on the level of realisations generated from the portfolio during the year
•	
15% on sourcing managed third-party capital in support of our strategy
•	
15% on reducing the discount between share price and NAV per share
•	
5% based on ESG metrics aligned to our sustainability strategy
The detailed performance conditions used to calculate initial AIS outturn for 2024 are set out in the table below.
Performance condition  
(% weighting)
Payment criteria
2024 performance  
(% of component 
awarded)
2024 performance  
(% of component awarded)
Return on NAV (40%) 
5% improvement in NAV per share (target 
120.5p): 25% of maximum opportunity 
(“threshold”) 
15% improvement in NAV per share (target 
132.0p): 100% of maximum opportunity
Below minimum target
0% of component 
awarded
Both NAV and NAV per share reduced across 2024, primarily due to 
a further fall in the value of the quoted portfolio and a number of 
discrete (unrealised) value adjustments which reflect our prudent 
approach to the valuation of individual portfolio companies.
(see page 10 for details)
Liquidity as a 
strategic asset (25%)
£nil to £50.0m (sliding scale)
£194m
100% of component 
awarded
Good underlying performance throughout the year which would 
have led to a full payment, further supplemented by c.£119m 
received in year as a result of the sale of Featurespace.
(see page 11 for details)
Access to third-party 
capital (15%)
Access to new co-investment capital of £45m 
(25% of maximum opportunity) to £95m (100% 
of maximum opportunity
£94.8m
99.7% of component 
awarded
Continued EIS fundraising through the year, plus the agreement of 
a further tranche of directly-controlled third-party co-investment 
capital from our strategic partner, Hostplus.
(see page 11 for details)
NAV per share/share 
price discount (15%)
Reduce the discount between share price and 
NAV by between 10% (25%) and 40% (100%) 
between year end 2023 and year end 2024
Below minimum target
0% of component 
awarded
The discount level widened (albeit marginally) over the 
measurement period.
ESG Performance 
(5%)
50% plc performance: Based on continued 
out-performance of sector benchmarks for 
Refinitiv, MSCI and ISS.
50% portfolio impact: Based upon making 
sufficient progress in the agreement, collection 
and analysis of data relating to specific 
portfolio company ESG and impact metrics.
100% achievement of plc 
element; 0% achievement 
of portfolio impact
50% of component 
awarded
Outperformance of sector benchmarks for all of Refinitiv, MSCI 
and ISS.
Commercial pressures followed by changes in the team meant a 
reduced focus on progressing specific portfolio company ESG and 
impact metrics during the year. Whilst we believe that this was the 
right decision, it means that insufficient progress was made in this 
area to allow for the release of an associated AIS payment.
Total weighted 
outturn
42.5% of maximum (equating to 31.9% of base salary)
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
93
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

The Committee discussed the output of the quantitative targets as shown on 
page 93, and considered that this outturn appropriately reflected the broader overall 
performance of the business over 2024. The Committee particularly noted the impact 
of a number of external factors on the calculated bonus amount, including the 
continuation of difficult macroeconomic conditions through the year, but also noted 
the significant progress in a range of areas expected to underpin shareholder value 
growth as the Group moves forward, most particularly the exceptional realisations 
performance in the year and the associated improvement in the financial position of 
the Group.
As such, the Committee determined that the calculated outcome aligned with a fair 
assessment of performance over the year, and that no discretionary adjustment to 
this calculated outcome was therefore required.
The resulting AIS outturn for 2024 for the Executive Directors was, therefore, determined 
as 42.5% of maximum opportunity. In accordance with the Remuneration Policy, all 
amounts to individuals above an initial minimum amount paid in cash, which for the 
2024 AIS is £25,000, will be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares (deferred over two years 
under the Group’s Deferred Bonus Share Plan (“DBSP”)).
Share-based incentive schemes
2021 LTIP awards that vested in 2024
As reported in the 2023 Directors’ Remuneration Report, the final outstanding LTIP 
award was awarded in 2021. Vesting was dependent upon a combination of Total 
Shareholder Return and Growth in NAV over the vesting period, which ran from April 
2021 to March 2024. As anticipated in the 2023 report, both measures were below the 
levels required to trigger vesting.
After the end of the vesting period, the Committee considered whether this outcome 
was appropriate in the context of performance delivered over the vesting period, and 
determined that it was a fair and reasonable outcome. As such, the 2021 award lapsed 
in full on the vesting date.
There are no further unvested LTIP awards, following the switch to RSP awards in 2022.
2022 Restricted Share Plan awards vesting in 2025
The Committee reviewed the vesting of the 2022 Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”) award, 
in the context of the underpins in place for that award. The 2022 RSP award (and all 
subsequent awards) are subject to a robust underpin with a quantitative trigger. As 
a result of the significant external market pressures which have impacted business 
performance over the three-year period and the subsequent reduction in NAV, the 
underpin condition was not met.
As such, and in line with the terms of the underpin, the Committee actively reviewed 
the vesting level for the 2022 RSP award, considering quantitative performance 
measures as well as taking into account a broader review of performance. As part 
of this review, the Committee noted the actions taken by the management team to 
assure long-term shareholder value growth, including the significant and sustained 
level of realisations, strong cash position of the Group, level of cash returned to 
shareholders and the strong pipeline of future opportunity. 
Taking into account the wide range of factors specific to this award, and after careful 
and balanced consideration, the Committee concluded that none of the 2022 RSP 
awards would vest, and they will therefore lapse in full.
2024 Restricted Share Plan Awards
Details of the RSP awards granted during 2024 to each Executive Director are set out in 
the table below:
Executive Director
Type of 
interest
Basis of 
award 
(% salary)
Face value 
(000s)
End of 
vesting 
period
Greg Smith
2024 RSP
200%
£1,092
31 Mar 2027
David Baynes
2024 RSP
133%
£498
31 Mar 2027
The Committee continues to believe that the maximum award permitted under the 
Policy (being 200% of salary for the CEO, 133% of salary for other Executive Directors) 
is set at an appropriate and reasonable level. It also recognises the responsibility to 
make individual awards in a prudent and responsible way, only utilising the maxima 
agreed under the Policy when it is confident that such awards are appropriate and 
in the best interests of shareholders. The Committee believes that this condition held 
in 2024.
94	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Change in remuneration of the Directors compared to Group employees
The table below sets out the change in the remuneration of the Directors and that of our UK employees (excluding Directors and new joiners/leavers):
% Change in base salary
% Change in bonus
% Change in benefits 
(excluding pensions)
2023 to 
2024
2022 to 
2023
2021 to 
2022
2020 to 
2021
2019 to 
2020
2023 to 
2024
2022 to 
2023
2021 to 
2022
2020 to 
2021
2019 to 
2020
2023 to 
2024
2022 to 
2023
2021 to 
2022
2020 to 
2021
2019 to 
2020
Greg Smith
0.9%
3.0%
48.4%
20.8%
5.9%
69.3%
(14.2)%
(65.0)%
23.5%
254.1%
8.2%
(11.7)%
(2.3)%
4.2%
5.1%
David Baynes
0.8%
3.0%
17.4%
7.7%
2.0%
69.3%
(14.6)%
(72.3)%
11.2%
241.0%
6.8%
33.2%
(14.1)%
17.6%
5.2%
Sir Douglas Flint 
4.1%
15.5%
4.2%
2.0%
2.2%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Dr Elaine Sullivan
(52.7)%
13.7%
4.6%
2.2%
1.8%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Dr Caroline Brown
4.0%
13.9%
17.1%
1.8%
1.8%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Aedhmar Hynes
4.0%
9.7%
19.6%
19.8%
1.8%
–
–
–
–
(100)% (26.9)%
142.0%
–
–
Heejae Chae
18.1%
13.1%
3.8%
1.8%
1.8%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Anita Kidgell
9.4%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
UK employees
7.8%
7.3%
10.4%
5.9%
8.0%
4.3%
6.5%
(39.1)%
59.3%
78.7%
9.7%
5.6%
11.9%
7.9%
4.7% 
Historical Executive pay and Group performance
The table and graph set out on this page enable a comparison of the TSR of the Group 
and the Chief Executive Officer remuneration outcomes over the last ten years.
The chart shows the Company’s TSR performance against the performance of the 
FTSE 250 index over the ten-year period to 31 December 2024. Taking into account 
IP Group’s business model, there is no directly relevant FTSE sector index. The Directors 
have therefore selected the FTSE 250 as relevant equity index for comparison on the 
basis that it is the FTSE equity market index of which IP Group is a constituent.
0
50
100
150
200
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
%
change
Source: Datastream
IP Group
FTSE 250
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
95
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Historical Chief Executive Officer remuneration outcomes
The table below summarises the Chief Executive Officer single figure for total remuneration, annual bonus pay-out and share based incentives (LTIP and RSP) vesting as a 
percentage of maximum opportunity for the previous ten-year period:
Chief Executive Officer
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
20211
2022
2023
2024
CEO single figure of remuneration (£000s)
669
265
552
413
498
797
730
958
765
773
Annual bonus pay-out (% of maximum)
100%
0%
57%
17%
28%
93%
96.3%
30.4%
25.1%
42.5%
Share-based incentives vesting (% of maximum)
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
51.1%
13.7%
0%
1	
2021 and years thereafter relate to Greg Smith, who was appointed as CEO on 7 October 2021 (previously CFO). Previous years reported relate to Alan Aubrey.
Directors’ shareholdings and share interests
The Group’s Remuneration Policy determines a minimum shareholding requirement of 350% of salary for the Chief Executive Officer and 250% of salary for other Executive 
Directors including the CFOO.
At the end of the year, neither Greg Smith nor David Baynes met this requirement. Both Executive Directors are ordinarily, at a minimum, expected to retain all post-tax shares 
received under the RSP, LTIP and DBSP to ensure that minimum levels are met and maintained, in line with the Policy.
Interests in shares (audited)
The Directors who held office during 2024 had the following beneficial interests in the ordinary shares of the Company:
At 31 December 2024
Total interest in shares
Total unvested holdings
Current Directors
Shares 
owned 
Number
Shares which 
have fully vested 
but have not yet 
been issued
Total 
interest
Minimum 
shareholding 
requirement 
met?1
LTIP
DBSP
RSP
Greg Smith
752,686
122,329
875,014
No
0
121,201
5,158,368
David Baynes
673,887
117,797
791,684
No
0
71,628
2,400,201
Dr Elaine Sullivan2
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
Sir Douglas Flint
94,500
-
94,500
–
–
–
–
Heejae Chae
32,712
-
32,712
–
–
–
–
Dr Caroline Brown
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
Aedhmar Hynes
21,000
-
21,000
–
–
–
–
Anita Kidgell
-
-
-
–
–
–
–
1	
Based on owned/vested shares only.
2	 At the date of stepping down from the Board
There have been no changes in the interests of the Directors set out above between 31 December 2024 and 25 March 2025.
96	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Share-based incentive plan awards (audited)
The Executive Directors’ participations in the Group’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) and Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”) are set out in the table below:
Number of shares 
conditionally held at 
1 January 2024
Conditional shares 
notionally awarded in 
the year
Vested 
during the 
year1
Lapsed 
during the 
year
Potential conditional 
interest in shares at 
31 December 2024
Share price 
at date of 
conditional 
award (p)
Earliest 
vesting 
date(s)
Greg Smith
2021 LTIP
483,253
–
–
483,253
–
125.40
31–Mar–24
2022 RSP2
1,043,046
–
–
–
1,043,046
75.50
31–Mar–25
2023 RSP
1,813,953
–
–
–
1,813,953
60.20
31–Mar–26
2024 RSP
–
2,301,369
–
–
2,301,369
47.45
31–Mar–27
3,340,252
2,301,369
–
483,253
5,158,368
David Baynes
2021 LTIP
465,709
–
–
465,709
–
125.40
31–Mar–24
2022 RSP2
476,809
–
–
–
476,809
75.50
31–Mar–25
2023 RSP
829,215
–
–
–
829,215
60.20
31–Mar–26
2024 RSP
–
1,052,028
–
1,052,028
47.45
31–Mar–27
1,771,733
1,052,028
–
465,709
2,358,052
1	
All share-based incentives which vest during a given year will be subject to a further holding period of two years, with shares not being issued to participants until the end of the holding period. The 
actual number of shares to be issued at the end of the holding period will be adjusted in aggregate to account for any dividends paid during the vesting and holding period.
2	 The 2022 RSP grant, shown in full in the table (as at 31 December 2024) will lapse in full as set out on page 94
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
97
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Deferred Bonus Share Plan (“DBSP”) (audited)
Directors’ interests in nil-cost options under the Group’s DBSP that have been granted in order to defer AIS bonuses in accordance with our Policy are as follows:
Options held at 
1 January 
2024
Option 
awarded in 
the year
Exercised 
during the 
year1
Lapsed 
during the 
year
Options held at 
31 December 
2024
Share price 
at date of 
award (p)
Earliest 
vesting 
dates 
Greg Smith
Deferral from 2021 AIS
88,100
–
88,100
–
–
90.00
31–Mar–24
Deferral from 2022 AIS
39,327
–
39,327
–
–
60.20
31–Mar–24
Deferral from 2022 AIS
39,327
–
–
–
39,237
60.20
31–Mar–25
Deferral from 2023 AIS
–
40,982
–
–
40,982
47.45
31–Mar–25
Deferral from 2023 AIS
–
40,982
–
–
40,982
47.45
31–Mar–26
166,754
81,964
127,427
 –
121,201
David Baynes
Deferral from 2021 AIS
75,451
–
75,451
–
–
90.00
31–Mar–24
Deferral from 2022 AIS
23,704
–
23,704
–
–
60.20
31–Mar–24
Deferral from 2022 AIS
23,704
–
–
–
23,704
60.20
31–Mar–25
Deferral from 2023 AIS
–
23,962
–
–
23,962
47.45
31–Mar–25
Deferral from 2023 AIS
–
23,962
–
–
23,962
47.45
31–Mar–26
122,859
47,924
99,155
–
71,628
 
3	 Actual number of options released for exercise is adjusted where relevant to reflect the adjustment made to account for dividend payments made during the holding period.
Save As You Earn (“SAYE”) (audited)
The Group operates an HMRC-registered SAYE share save scheme for all UK employees in which both Executive Directors have participated during the year:
Options held at 
1 January 
2024 
Options 
awarded in 
the year
Exercised 
during the 
year
Lapsed 
during the 
year
Options held at 
31 December 
2024
Option 
exercise 
price (p)
Share price 
at date of 
award (p)
Earliest 
vesting 
date(s)
Greg Smith
2023 SAYE
39,586
–
–
–
39,586
46.86
58.56
01-Nov-26
David Baynes
2022 SAYE
27,692
–
–
–
27,692
65.0
81.25
01-Nov-25
98	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Relative importance of spend on pay
The table below shows total employee costs, change in shareholder distributions, 
change in NAV and change in share price from 2023 to 2024.
2024
2023
% change
Total employee costs (£m)
19
19
0%
Distributions to shareholders (dividend or 
share buyback, £m)
29.6
13.1
126%
NAV (£m)
956.5
1,182.5
(19.1%)
Share price (p)
53.9
58.1
(7.23%)
The information shown in this chart is based on the following:
Total employee pay: total employee costs from note 9 including wages and salaries, 
social security costs, pension and share-based payments.
Change in NAV: change in the Group’s net assets excluding goodwill and intangibles 
taken from the statement of financial position on page 118.
External appointments for Executive Directors
Any proposed external directorships are considered by the Board to ensure they do 
not cause a conflict of interest but, subject to this, Executive Directors may accept 
a maximum of two external Non-executive appointments and, indeed, the Board 
believes that it is part of their ongoing development to do so. Where an Executive 
Director accepts an appointment to the board of a company in which the Group is a 
shareholder, the Group generally retains the related fees. In the circumstances where 
the Executive Director receives such fees directly, such sums are generally deducted 
from their base salary from the Group. Fees earned for directorships of companies in 
which the Group does not have a shareholding are normally retained by the relevant 
Director. Key external appointments (excluding companies in which the Group holds 
shares) held by Executive Directors are set out on pages 61 to 63.
Limits on the number of shares used to satisfy share 
awards (dilution limits)
All of the Group’s incentive schemes that contain an element that may be satisfied 
in IP Group shares incorporate provisions that in any ten-year period (ending on the 
relevant date of grant), the maximum number of the shares that may be issued or 
issuable under all such schemes shall (i) not exceed 10% of the issued ordinary share 
capital of the Company; and (ii) such shares issued on a discretionary basis shall not 
exceed 5% of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company. 
The Committee regularly monitors the position and, prior to the making of any share-
based award, considers the effect of potential vesting of outstanding awards to 
ensure that the Company remains within these limits. Any awards which are required 
to be satisfied by market-purchased shares are excluded from such calculations, but 
any shares utilised from treasury to settle share-based awards are included. The table 
below sets out the current level of dilution against the limits in the bonus and long-
term incentive plan and sets out the commitments to issue shares made during the 
financial year reported.
Maximum
Current dilution
Additional dilution during 
the year in question
10% dilution in ten years
3.48%
0.88%
5% dilution in ten years
2.46%
0.66%
Service agreements
The Executive Directors have service contracts that commenced on the dates set out 
below and contain a contractual notice period of six months by either party. The Non-
executive Directors have letters of appointment that commenced on the dates set out 
below, are generally for an initial fixed term of three years, which is reviewed and may 
be extended for two further three-year periods and are terminable on three months’ 
notice by either party. 
The letters of appointment and service contracts are available for inspection at 
the Company’s registered office. In accordance with the Code, all Directors submit 
themselves for annual re-election by shareholders at each AGM and will do so at the 
AGM to be held on 12 June 2025.
Greg Smith
7 October 2021
David Baynes 
7 October 2021
Heejae Chae 
3 May 2018
Sir Douglas Flint 
17 September 2018 (effective as Chair from November 2018)
Dr Caroline Brown 
1 July 2019
Aedhmar Hynes 
1 August 2019
Anita Kidgell 
18 January 2023
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
99
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

External advisors
The Remuneration Committee is authorised, if it wishes, to seek independent specialist services to provide information and advice on remuneration at the Company’s expense, 
including attendance at Committee meetings.
During the early part of 2024, the Remuneration Committee received independent advice from Deloitte LLP in respect of the application of the Group’s Remuneration Policy, and 
reporting under the Directors’ Remuneration Reporting Regulations. Fees paid to Deloitte LLP in connection with advice to the Committee during 2024 were £8,000 (excluding VAT), 
based on time spent. In April 2024, and following a formal tender process, A&M were appointed as independent advisors to the Remuneration Committee. A&M provided advice in 
respect of the review of the Remuneration Policy and its implementation. Fees paid to A&M in connection with advice to the Committee during 2024 were £68,000 (excluding VAT), 
based on time spent. A&M does not provide any other services to IP Group. 
Both Deloitte LLP and A&M are members of the Remuneration Consultants Group and adhere to its Code in relation to Executive remuneration consulting in the UK. In both 
cases, the lead engagement partner has no other connection with the Company or individual Directors, and the Committee is satisfied that advice provided was objective and 
independent. 
Statement of shareholder voting
The table below sets out the proxy results of the votes on resolutions in respect of Directors’ remuneration at the 2022 AGM and the 2024 AGM.
Votes for
Votes against
Number
% of 
votes cast
Number
% of 
votes cast
Total votes cast
Votes withheld
Remuneration Policy (2022 AGM)
654,265,665
80.67%
156,765,453
19.33%
820,514,461
9,483,343
Remuneration Report (2024 AGM)
599,931,114
82.62%
126,245,461
17.38%
726,176,583
250,575
The Remuneration Committee was pleased with the level of support for the Remuneration Report at the 2024 AGM, and looks forward to building upon this with the renewal of the 
Remuneration Policy at the 2025 meeting.
Remuneration disclosure
This report complies with the requirements of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups Regulations 2008 as amended in 2013, the provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code and the Listing Rules.
On behalf of the Board
Heejae Chae
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
25 March 2025
100	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
ANNUAL REMUNERATION STATEMENT.
STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal responsibilities
The duties of the Audit & Risk Committee are set out 
in its Terms of Reference, which are available on 
the Company’s website. The principal duties of the 
Committee are to:
•	
Monitor the integrity of the financial statements 
of the Group including its Annual and Half-yearly 
Reports, and other formal announcements 
relating to its financial performance with 
consideration being given to any significant 
financial reporting judgements contained therein
•	
Review and report to the Board on significant 
financial reporting issues and judgements 
contained in the financial statements 
•	
Advise the Board on whether it believes the 
Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is 
fair, balanced and understandable and provides 
the information necessary for shareholders to 
assess the Group’s performance, business model 
and strategy
•	
Review and monitor the Group’s risk management 
system and carry out a review of its effectiveness 
and approve the statements included in the 
Annual Report concerning risk management
•	
Ensure that a robust assessment of the principal 
risks facing the Group has been undertaken
•	
Assess the Group’s ongoing viability and going 
concern status 
•	
Recommend the appointment and remuneration 
of the external auditor, assess audit effectiveness 
and monitor provision of non-audit services 
•	
Assess the content of the external auditor’s 
independence report in providing both audit and 
non-audit services
•	
Review the remit, planned scope of activities, 
performance and effectiveness of outsourced 
internal audit support
•	
Monitor the Group’s systems and controls for the 
prevention of bribery and fraud
•	
Review the adequacy and security of the Group’s 
arrangements for its employees to speak up and 
raise concerns
Key activities in the year
The key areas of focus for the Committee in 2024 
and early 2025 included: 
•	
Consideration of key areas of accounting 
judgement, including: (i) valuation of unquoted 
investments at half-year and year-end reporting; 
and (ii) IFRS 10 treatment of the US platform and 
Istesso Limited
•	
Oversight of the transfer of KPMG audit partner 
responsibility during the year, following the 
outcome of the audit tender process conducted 
in 2023
•	
Review of management plans on the 
implementation of the 2024 UK Corporate 
Governance Code including Provision 29 
requirements
•	
Review the results of an internal audit review in 
respect of the operating effectiveness of key 
controls over operational risks and continued 
monitoring of the implementation of agreed 
improvements from this and earlier reviews
Procedural and  
governance matters 
•	
The Group’s Chief Financial & Operating Officer, 
Company Secretary, Finance Director and the 
external auditor are invited to attend each 
Committee meeting, at which they present reports 
and provide analysis on key areas of significance 
to the Committee in relation to audit and risk 
matters 
•	
At the request of the Committee, the Group’s 
Chair and CEO also attended each Committee 
meeting
•	
Meetings cover regular agenda items on audit, 
risk and internal controls, compliance and 
policies. Additional matters are considered as 
required and other members of management 
are invited to attend for specific subjects 
where required
Dr Caroline Brown
Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee
Committee membership
The Audit and Risk Committee currently comprises the 
following independent Non-executive Directors whose 
backgrounds and experience are summarised on 
pages 61 to 63:
•	
Dr Caroline Brown (Chair)
•	
Aedhmar Hynes
•	
Dr Elaine Sullivan (retired June 2024)
•	
Heejae Chae
•	
Anita Kidgell
Report contents
•	
Principal responsibilities
•	
Key activities in the year
•	
Procedural and governance matters
•	
Key accounting judgements and other priority 
items reviewed by the Committee
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
101
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR GOVERNANCE

•	
In preparation for each Committee meeting, I meet 
privately with management and the external auditor, 
and where relevant with representatives of the 
internal audit team
•	
At the end of the annual audit process and at 
several points throughout the year the Committee 
meets with the external auditor without any 
members of the executive management team being 
present
•	
As part of the annual evaluation of risk management 
and internal controls the Committee as a whole also 
met with the Head of the outsourced internal audit 
resource without management being present
•	
I continued to attend meetings of the Group’s 
Valuation Committee as a member, alongside 
my fellow Non-executive Director, Heejae Chae. 
Attendance at these meetings provides both 
an element of independence to the Valuation 
Committee and provides a detailed understanding 
of portfolio valuation considerations
•	
The Committee met seven times in 2024 and twice in 
2025 ahead of the release of the FY24 annual report 
and accounts
In relation to governance considerations:
•	
The Committee comprises four independent 
Non-executive Directors following the retirement 
of Dr Elaine Sullivan in June 2024. All members are 
considered to be appropriately experienced to 
fulfil their role and allow the Committee to perform 
its duties effectively (see the Board skills matrix on 
page 60 for further details of members skills focus)
•	
I am deemed by the Board to have recent and 
relevant financial experience, being a Fellow of the 
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, 
having held senior executive financial positions and 
current Audit and Risk Committee experience
•	
The Board is satisfied that for the year under 
review, and thereafter, the Group’s Audit and Risk 
Committee, as a whole, has competence relevant to 
the sector in which the Group operates
•	
The Committee assessed its performance in 2024 
through an internally facilitated process led by 
the Chair, supported by the Company Secretary. 
Such process concluded that the Committee had 
continued to perform effectively during 2024
•	
The Committee undertook an evaluation of the 
external auditor’s performance in 2023, which 
included input from the Finance Director, CFOO and 
wider finance team. Through this process minor 
areas for improvement were identified and agreed 
with the auditor, who was deemed to have met the 
Committee’s expectation in the year
•	
In 2024, the Group re-evaluated its internal audit 
strategy having considered the Group’s evolving 
needs and risk profile and made the strategic 
decision to transition from a fully outsourced internal 
audit function to a more flexible approach which 
allows the Group to utilise internal audit resources 
from PwC on an as-needed basis
•	
The Committee undertook an assessment of the 
outsourced internal audit resource utilised in 2024, 
which included input from the individual members 
of the Group’s Risk Council, Non-executive Directors 
and all those members of management who had 
interacted with the outsourced internal audit team in 
the year. The assessment considered the outsourced 
internal audit team’s understanding of the Group’s 
business risks, their subject matter expertise, 
professionalism and effectiveness in improving 
the Group’s operations via recommendations 
that are appropriate for the size, nature and scale 
of the business. The Committee concluded that 
they were satisfied with the expertise provided by 
PwC in the year and welcome the move to a more 
focused and strategic use of internal audit resource 
going forward 
•	
The Committee continues to review its terms of 
reference at least annually and will propose updates 
where necessary or appropriate to reflect current 
market practice
Key accounting judgements
Valuation of unquoted equity and 
debt investments:
The valuation of unquoted investments remains the 
most material area of judgement in the financial 
statements and is a key audit risk for the Group. At each 
external reporting date the Committee receives updates 
from the Valuation Committee and from the external 
auditor regarding the approach that has been taken in 
assessing and auditing, respectively, the key estimates 
and judgements in respect of portfolio valuations. 
Significant time at Committee meetings is assigned 
to discuss portfolio valuations, which has allowed the 
Committee to debate and challenge the approach 
taken. The Group continued to apply its valuation policy 
consistently across investments at the year end, which 
included consideration of the macro environment and 
relevant industry metrics such as revenue multiples 
where relevant.
As in previous years, the Committee has paid significant 
attention to the valuation of the Group’s holdings in 
unquoted investments, which have not completed a 
funding round within the last twelve months, assets 
which have seen significant positive or negative 
developments in the year, companies which require 
funding in the next twelve months, and assets with 
active financings or sale processes on or after the 
measurement date. We continue to make use of 
third-party valuations specialists, with external valuation 
reports being commissioned on six of our larger 
investments in 2024 (2023: eleven). This increases the 
independence of our process and helps to ensure that 
our valuation approach continues to reflect market 
best practice. 
The Valuation Committee assists in the application 
and documentation of management’s valuation 
judgements in line with the Group’s accounting policies 
and industry valuation guidance from IPEV (International 
Private Equity and Venture Capital). The Valuation 
Committee is chaired by the CFOO, and its members 
are the CEO, Heejae Chae and me. Also in attendance 
was the Managing Partner of the Balance Sheet 
102	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

investments, Finance Director and external auditor, with 
other investment team members joining meetings on 
request. During the year, the Committee considered 
the Valuation Committee’s terms of reference and 
composition and concluded that it was satisfied with the 
current level of scrutiny and challenge by the ARC at the 
Valuation Committee. 
The Valuation Committee met seven times in 2024 and 
twice in early 2025 to review management’s valuations 
for the half-year and full-year results reporting. The 
Committee’s 2025 meeting included review of the 
proposed Annual Report disclosures, including the 
approach to valuation sensitivity disclosures. See further 
details in note 13.
Application of the consolidation 
requirements of IFRS 10 in respect of 
IPG Cayman LP and Istesso Limited
The Group’s US portfolio is held via a limited partnership 
fund, IPG Cayman LP, and is managed by Longview 
Innovations, formerly an operating subsidiary of the 
Group. Following a reorganisation which took place in 
2021, the Group was no longer deemed to control IPG 
Cayman LP, which was accordingly deconsolidated 
in 2021. 
In respect of Istesso Limited, although the Group has 
a 56.5% undiluted economic interest in the company, 
the Group holds a significant proportion of its equity via 
non-voting shares resulting in it holding less than 50% 
of the voting rights at the company. Additionally, the 
Group does not control the board of Istesso Limited via 
a majority of board directors and has no mechanism 
whereby it can do so. As a result the Group is deemed 
not to control Istesso and therefore its results are not 
consolidated with those of the Group. 
The Committee reviewed and discussed management’s 
detailed assessment, including changes in the year, and 
concluded that the Group does not control IPG Cayman 
LP and Istesso Limited at its meetings in July 2024 and 
February 2025 and agreed that this judgment continued 
to be appropriate for both the Group’s half-yearly and 
Annual Report and Accounts. 
Review of Annual Report and 
Accounts and Half-yearly Report
The Committee carried out a thorough review of the 
Group’s Annual Report and Accounts and its Half-yearly 
Report for 2024 resulting in the recommendation of both 
for approval by the Board. In carrying out its review, the 
Committee gave particular consideration to whether 
the Annual Report, taken as a whole, was fair, balanced 
and understandable, concluding that it was. It did this 
primarily through consideration of the reporting of the 
Group’s performance, business model and strategy, the 
competitive landscape in which it operates, the significant 
risks it faces, the progress made against its strategic 
objectives and by its portfolio companies during the year.
In addition to the significant accounting judgments and 
estimates noted above, the committee also considered 
revenue recognition, segmental reporting, long-term 
viability and going concern disclosures and the use 
of Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”). The 
committee also reviewed a summary of controls reliance 
gained in the year and related internal control disclosures 
made within the Corporate Governance Report.
Going concern and long-term 
viability review 
On an annual basis the Committee reviews and 
approves the long-term viability review prepared by 
management and satisfies itself that the Group remains 
a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from 
the publication date of the accounts, and that therefore 
the going concern basis for the preparation of the 
Group’s results remains appropriate.
The Committee reviewed a management assessment 
of the Group’s long-term viability. The long-term 
viability review was based on the Group’s three-year 
strategic plan, including forecast levels of investment, 
realisations, overheads, financing cash flows and 
shareholder returns. Management conducted scenario 
analysis under both intermediate and severe downside 
scenarios, and back-testing to assess the Group’s ability 
to continue operating within the cash trap and covenant 
limits of its debt facility. The Committee agreed to 
recommend the Viability Statement, which is set out on 
page 49, to the Board for approval. 
The Valuation Committee
Members
Chief Financial and 
Operating Officer 
David Baynes 
(Chair)
Chief Executive Officer 
Greg Smith
Non-executive Director 
and ARC Chair 
Dr Caroline Brown
Non-executive Director 
Heejae Chae
Attendees
Managing Partner of  
Balance Sheet Investments  
Mark Reilly
Other investment team members by invitation
Finance Director 
Chris Glasson
Valuation Committee recommends reporting 
date valuations to the  
Audit and Risk Committee
Valuation Committee review and challenge 
of the recommendations, request further 
reviews or third-party support be utilised
Valuation assessments and 
recommendations shared with  
Committee, including relevant  
supporting evidence
Group finance team prepare valuations with 
input from:
Investment 
Directors
External 
valuation 
specialists
Market data 
sources
Jatin Patel, External Audit Partner attends the Committee 
by invitation
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
103
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Risk and internal controls
The key elements of the Group’s internal control 
framework and procedures are set out on pages 38 and 
39. The principal risks the Group faces are set out on 
pages 40 to 48. During the year, the Committee devoted 
part of each meeting to items concerning risk and risk 
management. 
An important element of the Group’s risk management 
framework is the Risk Council whose purpose is to co-
ordinate governance, risk and controls internally prior to 
reporting to the Committee and Board. Its permanent 
members are the CFOO, Company Secretary, Finance 
Director and Senior Compliance and Risk Manager, with 
other executives and management from across the 
business attending during the year as necessary. The 
Risk Council met four times during the year and reported 
to the Committee at each meeting. 
The Committee reviewed management’s progress on 
developing an implementation plan for the Provision 29 
requirements included in the revised 2024 UK Corporate 
Governance Code which will apply to financial years 
beginning on or after 1 January 2026. This included 
workshop sessions facilitated by PwC to agree a controls 
governance framework and identification of a sub-
set of the Group’s risks which would be considered to 
be material. 
During 2024, the Committee reviewed management’s 
updated assessment of strategic and principal risks 
and risk appetite statements, prepared using input 
from the Risk Council, and took part in a risk workshop 
to assess the Group’s principal risks, risk appetite and 
desired control investment. The Committee reviewed 
output from the Risk Council summarising key themes 
arising from the operational risk reviews and the 
Group’s updated strategic and principal risk profiles. The 
Committee also carried out a horizon scanning exercise 
to identify potential emerging risks.
The Committee reviewed the output of an internal audit 
review which tested the key controls in place to mitigate 
the Group’s principal risks. This review included all key 
financial, operational and compliance controls. PwC, 
on behalf of management, assessed the control design 
and operating effectiveness of these key controls over 
principal risks, using the COSO framework principles. 
No significant failings or weaknesses were identified. 
However, a number of minor control deficiencies were 
identified and recommendations for improvement 
were agreed with management. Implementation of the 
remedial actions is monitored by the Risk Council and 
reported to the Committee.
The Committee’s review of risk management systems 
in place includes an assessment of performance 
of the Risk Council against agreed objectives and 
monitoring of key risk indicators against pre-agreed 
thresholds determined in response to the Board’s 
annual assessment of the Group’s principal risks and risk 
appetite.
Cyber security
The Board continues to consider cyber threats as a 
principal risk to the business with an overall “high” 
risk rating. During the year the Committee has been 
provided with regular updates on the cyber and 
information security in place across the Group, including 
the status of remediation actions agreed in respect of 
an internal audit review in 2023. The committee were 
also provided with summary output from an externally 
facilitated scenario-based training session which 
simulated a serious cyber incident with the Group’s 
“Silver Response Team” chaired by the CFOO. The Group 
continued to deploy regular interactive cyber threat 
refresher sessions and a compulsory annual training 
session whose completion was monitored by the Risk 
Council.
Compliance
Ensuring compliance for regulated businesses remains 
a priority from the perspective of the Committee 
and regular updates are provided to the Committee 
by the Group’s subsidiary compliance officers and 
international equivalents. Ongoing internal reviews are 
conducted through the use of a compliance monitoring 
programme and specialist advisory firms including local 
advisors are employed to advise on areas of regulation 
relevant to the Group’s operations where required. 
The Committee reviewed the summary findings of 
procedures in place which review the nature of gifts 
and hospitality received and provided in the year to 
identify any instances of corruption and bribery, and 
management carried out an enhanced fraud risk 
assessment and determined that there was a low risk of 
fraud occurring undetected.
Internal audit
The Group re-evaluated its fully outsourced internal 
audit model in the year and concluded that going 
forward the Group would continue to access PwC’s 
expertise for specific projects and reviews on an 
as-needed basis only and therefore would no longer 
maintain an outsourced internal audit function. The 
decision followed a review of the Group’s needs and risk 
profile and a strategic decision was made to enhance 
efficiency and focus on critical areas of internal control 
by engaging the PwC internal audit team for specific 
projects ensuring targeted and relevant assurance is 
obtained. The Committee considered the reduced level 
of independent assurance this change would cause and 
were satisfied with plans for the external internal audit 
resource to be used for directed assurance around 
specific, material internal controls. The Committee will 
continue to monitor and assess the effectiveness of 
internal controls through targeted reviews and audits 
ensuring that key risks are adequately managed.
In 2024, the internal audit resource provided by PwC 
was focused on delivering a control review in which 
Internal Audit carried out testing of the design and 
operating effectiveness of the Group’s key controls over 
principal risks and advising on the forthcoming Provision 
29 requirements of the new UK Corporate Governance 
Code. The Committee values the work of the internal 
auditor in providing independent and objective 
assurance in meeting its corporate governance and 
regulatory responsibilities.
The Committee considered the effectiveness of 
the internal audit resource utilised by reviewing the 
outcomes of their reports and recommendations, 
management’s implementation of recommendations 
and closure of the audit, access to experts, the annual 
strategy document and a management assessment of 
quality in the year. The Committee concluded that they 
were satisfied with the expertise provided by PwC in the 
year and welcome the move to a more focused and 
strategic use of internal audit resources going forward.
104	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

External audit
Audit tender outcome
As detailed in the 2023 Annual Report, following a 
rigorous formal audit tender process through 2023, 
the Board recommended to shareholders the re-
appointment of KPMG LLP as the Group’s external auditor 
at the 2024 AGM, and this recommendation was duly 
approved. The transition to Jatin Patel, the incoming 
audit partner at KPMG has now taken place.
Audit planning
The Committee discussed the auditor’s plan for the 
2024 year end audit at its July and December meetings. 
This included a summary of the proposed audit scope 
and the auditor’s assessment of the most significant 
financial reporting risks facing the Group, together 
with the auditor’s proposed audit approach. The main 
areas of audit focus for the year remained unchanged 
and included the valuation of the Group’s unquoted 
investments and the recoverability of investments on 
the parent company balance sheet. 
As in previous years a number of the Group’s smaller 
subsidiaries will be audited by Moore Northern Home 
Counties Limited. 
Appointment and independence
The Committee advises the Board on the appointment 
of the external auditor and on its remuneration both 
for audit and non-audit work and discusses the nature, 
scope and results of the audit with the external auditor. 
The Committee keeps under review the independence 
and objectivity of the external auditor. Controls in place 
include monitoring the independence and effectiveness 
of the audit, implementing a policy on the engagement 
of the external auditor to supply non-audit services, 
and a review of the scope of the audit and fee and 
performance of the external auditor.
Mandatory audit firm rotation is required after 20 years, 
and a re-tender must be conducted at least every 
ten years. The Code requires disclosure of the length 
of tenure of the current audit firm and when a tender 
was last conducted, as well as advance notice of any 
re-tendering plans. KPMG LLP have acted as the auditor 
to the Group since 2014, with a tender taking place in 
2023 which resulted in the reappointment of KPMG LLP. 
The lead audit partner rotates every five years to assure 
independence. Jatin Patel became lead audit partner 
responsible for the Group’s statutory audit for the 2024 
year end onwards following the outcome of the tender 
exercise noted above. 
Non-audit work
The Group has a policy for setting out what non-audit 
services can be procured by the Group from the external 
auditor. The policy aims to support and safeguard the 
objectivity and independence of the external auditor 
and incorporates the requirements of the FRC’s revised 
Ethical Standards for auditors. 
A copy of the Group’s non-audit services policy is 
available at www.ipgroupplc.com/investors/corporate-
governance. 
An analysis of audit and non-audit fees paid to KPMG is 
provided in note 6 to the financial statements. In 2024, 
the only non-audit service provided by KPMG in the year 
was the review of the Group’s half-yearly results. 
The Committee typically engages other firms to perform 
finance-related consulting engagements to ensure that 
the independence of the auditor is not compromised 
and during 2024 engaged the services of PwC (internal 
audit, risk and governance), Deloitte (valuations) and 
Kroll (valuations). 
Auditor independence
KPMG has reviewed its own independence in line with 
the FRC’s Ethical Standards for auditors and its own 
ethical guideline standards. KPMG has confirmed to the 
Committee that following its review it is satisfied that 
it has acted in accordance with relevant regulatory 
and professional requirements. KPMG has provided 
the Committee with details of the safeguards in place 
which include a culture of regular training, internal 
accountability and independent reviews performed by an 
engagement quality control reviewer, who is a partner not 
otherwise involved in the Group’s audit, and an annual 
attestation from all KPMG partners and staff to confirm 
their compliance with internal ethics and independence 
policies and procedures, including in particular that the 
audit team have no prohibited shareholdings which 
include IP Group plc and portfolio company shares. 
Having considered the aforementioned safeguards, the 
level of non-audit services provided in the year and a 
formal statement of independence, the Audit and Risk 
Committee is satisfied that the independence of the 
auditor has been maintained.
Auditor effectiveness
In order to assess the effectiveness of the external audit 
process, the Committee requested that management 
provide feedback on the outcome of the 2023 audit 
process, considering areas including planning 
effectiveness, audit quality and audit efficiency. The 
Committee concurred with management’s view that 
there had been appropriate focus and challenge of 
the primary areas of audit risk and the Committee 
concluded that the substantive and detailed approach 
taken by the auditor was entirely appropriate 
and effective. 
As in the previous year, the majority of the Group’s 
assets by value were reviewed as part of the audit, 
and once again there was particular emphasis on 
the valuation of unquoted investments. KPMG utilised 
specialist corporate finance staff to support its audit 
work on the valuation of Istesso Limited and, overall, 
the auditor’s risk-based approach drew on both their 
knowledge of the business and the wider economic and 
business environment.
Dr Caroline Brown
Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee
25 March 2024
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
105
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

Report of the Directors
The Directors present their report together with the 
audited financial statements for IP Group plc and its 
subsidiaries for the year ended 31 December 2024.
Corporate Governance Statement
Information that fulfils the requirements of the Corporate 
Governance Statement can be found on pages 58 
to 71 and is incorporated into this Directors’ Report 
by reference.
Dividend
No dividend was paid, or is to be paid, in relation to the 
year ended 31 December 2024. 
Directors
The names of Directors who held office during the year 
ended 31 December 2024 were as follows:
Executive Directors
•	
Greg Smith
•	
David Baynes
Non-executive Directors
•	
Sir Douglas Flint (Chair) 
•	
Dr Caroline Brown 
•	
Heejae Chae 
•	
Aedhmar Hynes 
•	
Anita Kidgell
•	
Dr Elaine Sullivan (until 12 June 2024) Details of the 
interests of the Directors in the share capital of the 
Company are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration 
Report on page 96.
The appointment and replacement of Directors is 
governed by the Company’s Articles of Association 
(the “Articles”), the Corporate Governance Code, the 
Companies Act 2006 (the “CA 2006”) and related 
legislation. Subject to the Articles, the CA 2006 and 
related legislation, any directions given by special 
resolution and any relevant statutes and regulations, the 
business of the Company will be managed by the Board 
who may exercise all the powers of the Company. 
Principal risks and uncertainties 
and financial instruments 
The Group is exposed to a number of risks through its 
operations, where risk mitigation is most notably focused 
on ensuring continued capabilities to support portfolio 
companies. The Group’s risk management objectives 
and policies are described on pages 38 and 39 and in 
the Corporate Governance Report on page 70. Further 
information on the Group’s financial risk management 
objectives and policies, including those in relation to 
credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk, is provided 
in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, 
along with further information on the Group’s use of 
financial instruments.
Significant events affecting 
the Group
Details of the important events affecting the Group and 
future development of the business are described on 
pages 05 to 15 of the Strategic Report. 
Branches of the Group outside 
of the UK
The Group does not have any branches outside of 
the UK.
Research and development
Details of the Group’s activities in the field of research 
and development are set out on pages 10 to 20 of the 
Strategic Report. 
Significant agreements
The Group has entered into various agreements to form 
partnerships or collaborations with nine universities in 
Australasia, which contain certain change-of-control 
provisions. In addition, in 2022 the Group entered into a 
Note Purchase Agreement with Phoenix Group in relation 
to private placement debt. This agreement contains 
certain provisions that would apply in the event of a 
change of control. There are no agreements between 
the Company, its Directors or employees that provide 
for compensation for loss of office or employment that 
occurs because of a takeover bid. 
Share capital and related matters
Details of the structure of the Company’s share capital 
and the rights attaching to the Company’s shares 
are set out in note 1 to the consolidated financial 
statements. There are no specific restrictions on the 
size of a holding or on the transfer of shares, which 
are both governed by the general provisions of the 
Company’s Articles of Association (the “Articles”) and 
prevailing legislation.
At the last Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) of the 
Company held on 12 June 2024 (the “2024 AGM”), 
authority was given to the Directors pursuant to the 
relevant provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (the “CA 
2006”) to allot shares and grant rights over securities in 
the Company within the parameters permitted by the 
Investment Association’s Share Capital Management 
Guidelines. The Directors propose to renew this authority 
at the Company’s next AGM to be held on 12 June 2025 
(“2025 AGM”). 
Authority was also granted at the 2024 AGM to disapply 
pre-emption rights in respect of allotment of ordinary 
shares on both a general basis and in respect of 
acquisitions and specified capital investments, within 
the parameters permitted by the Pre-emption Group’s 
Statement of Principles published in November 2022 
(the “Statement of Principles”). The Directors will seek to 
renew these authorities for a similar period at the 2025 
AGM in accordance with the Statement of Principles.
At the 2024 AGM, a special resolution was passed 
which granted the Directors authority to make market 
purchases of the Company’s shares up to a maximum 
of approximately 10% of the Company’s issued share 
capital as at 19 April 2024. This authority has been 
utilised during the year in connection with the Group’s 
share buyback programme, which commenced in 
December 2023, and which was extended in October 
2024, in line with the Group’s commitment to allocate a 
proportion of cash realisations to shareholder returns. 
Under such programme, during the financial year 
ended 31 December 2024, the Group bought back a 
total of 65,889,706 ordinary shares of 2p each, the 
total consideration for which was £29.6m. The shares 
repurchased in 2024 comprised 6.8% of the Group’s 
106	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
DIRECTORS’ REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

issued share capital as at 31 December 2024. The share 
buyback programme was further extended in January 
2025 and remains ongoing. 
The Directors will seek to renew the authority to 
purchase the Company’s own shares within similar 
parameters and for a similar period at the 2025 AGM.
Articles of Association
The Company’s Articles may be amended by a special 
resolution of the shareholders and were last amended 
at the 2021 AGM.
Substantial shareholders 
As at the date stated below the following shareholders 
held interests of 3% or more in the Company’s ordinary 
share capital. Other than as shown, so far as the 
Company (and its Directors) are aware, no other person 
held or was beneficially interested in a disclosable 
interest in the Company. 
Shareholder
% as at 
31 December 
2024
RPMI Railpen
16.65
Lombard Odier Investment Managers
9.25
BlackRock
5.79
Vanguard Group
5.49
Schroder Investment Management
4.06
Aberdeen
3.96
Legal & General Investment Management
3.30
Imperial College of Science, Technology 
& Medicine
3.16
Corporate and social responsibility
Details of the Group’s policies, activities and aims with 
regard to its corporate and social responsibilities, 
including details of its greenhouse gas emissions, are 
included in the Meaningful impact section on pages 
28 to 31, in the Corporate Governance Statement on 
page 65 and in the s172(1) Statement on pages 50 to 58.
Directors’ indemnity and 
liability insurance
During the year, the Company has maintained liability 
insurance in respect of its Directors. As permitted by 
the Articles and to the extent permitted by law, the 
Company has also granted the Directors a qualifying 
third-party indemnity provision against any liabilities the 
Directors may incur in the execution of their duties as 
directors of the Company or its subsidiaries, which was 
in force throughout the financial year and remains in 
force at the date of approval of this Annual Report.
Regulation
Top Technology Ventures Limited and Parkwalk Advisors 
Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, are 
authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct 
Authority under the Financial Services and Markets Act 
2000. In Australia, the Group’s wholly-owned subsidiary, 
IP2IPO Australia Management Pty Ltd is authorised and 
regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment 
Commission. IP Group Greater China Services Limited, 
a wholly-owned Hong Kong-incorporated subsidiary 
of the Company, was, during the year, authorised and 
regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures 
Commission. This company gave notice to the Hong 
Kong Securities and Futures Commission to cease its 
regulated activities with effect from 31 December 2024. 
Post-balance sheet events
Material events occurring since the balance sheet 
date are disclosed in note 28 to the Group’s financial 
statements.
Political donations and expenditure
It is the Board’s policy not to make political donations, 
incur political expenditure or otherwise make cash 
contributions to political parties. The Group did not make 
any political donations during 2024. However, the CA 
2006 is very broadly drafted in this area and the Board 
has raised a concern that it may include activities such 
as funding conferences or supporting certain bodies 
involved in policy review and law reform. Accordingly, at 
the 2024 AGM, the shareholders supported a resolution 
on a precautionary basis to authorise the Group to incur 
political expenditure (as defined in Section 365 of the CA 
2006) not exceeding £50,000 in total at any time from 
the date of the 2024 AGM up to the conclusion of the 
2025 AGM. The Board intends to seek renewed authority 
for the Group to incur political expenditure of not more 
than £50,000 in total at the Company’s 2025 AGM.
Disclosure of information to auditor 
Each Director at the date of approval of this Annual 
Report confirms that:
•	
so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant 
audit information of which the Company’s auditor is 
unaware; and 
•	
the Director has taken all steps that they ought 
to have taken as a Director in order to make 
themselves aware of any relevant audit information 
and to establish that the Company’s auditor is 
aware of that information 
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted 
in accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the 
CA 2006.
Going concern
The Directors confirm that they have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group will have adequate 
resources to continue in operational existence for 
at least the next twelve months from the date of the 
accounts and, accordingly, they continue to adopt 
the going concern basis in preparing the financial 
statements. A viability statement, as required by the 
Code, can be found in the Strategic Report on page 49.
This Directors’ Report was approved by the Board on 
24 March 2025 and signed on its behalf by:
Angela Leach
Company Secretary
25 March 2025
OUR FINANCIALS
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
107
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT
DIRECTORS’ REPORT.
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual 
Report, Strategic Report, Directors’ Report, the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report, the Corporate Governance 
Statement and the financial statements in accordance 
with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group 
and parent Company financial statements for each 
financial year. Under that law they are required to 
prepare the Group financial statements in accordance 
with UK-adopted international accounting standards 
and applicable law and have elected to prepare the 
parent Company financial statements in accordance 
with UK accounting standards and applicable law (UK 
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice), including FRS 
101 Reduced Disclosure Framework. 
Under company law, the Directors must not approve 
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that 
they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the 
Group and parent Company and of the Group’s profit or 
loss for that period. In preparing each of the Group and 
parent Company financial statements, the Directors are 
required to:
•	
select suitable accounting policies and then apply 
them consistently
•	
make judgements and estimates that are 
reasonable, relevant and reliable and, in respect 
of the parent Company financial statements only, 
prudent 
•	
for the Group financial statements, state whether 
they have been prepared in accordance with UK-
adopted international accounting standards
•	
for the parent Company financial statements, state 
whether applicable UK accounting standards have 
been followed, subject to any material departures 
disclosed and explained in the parent Company 
financial statements
•	
assess the Group and parent Company’s ability 
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as 
applicable, matters related to going concern
•	
use the going concern basis of accounting unless 
they either intend to liquidate the Group or the 
parent Company or to cease operations, or have no 
realistic alternative but to do so. 
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and 
explain the parent Company’s transactions and disclose 
with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial 
position of the parent Company and enable them to 
ensure that its financial statements comply with the 
Companies Act 2006. They are responsible for such 
internal control as they determine is necessary to 
enable the preparation of financial statements that are 
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud 
or error, and have general responsibility for taking such 
steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the 
assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud 
and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and 
integrity of the corporate and financial information 
included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the 
UK governing the preparation and dissemination of 
financial statements may differ from legislation in other 
jurisdictions.
In accordance with Disclosure Guidance and 
Transparency Rule (“DTR”) 4.1.16R, the financial 
statements will form part of the annual financial report 
prepared under DTR 4.1.17R and 4.1.18R. The auditor’s 
report on these financial statements provides no 
assurance over whether the annual financial report has 
been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
Responsibility statement of the 
Directors in respect of the annual 
financial report
The Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
•	
the financial statements, prepared in accordance 
with the applicable set of accounting standards, give 
a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial 
position and profit or loss of the Company and the 
undertakings included in the consolidation taken as 
a whole; and
•	
the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the 
development and performance of the business and 
the position of the Company and the undertakings 
included in the consolidation taken as a whole, 
together with a description of the principal risks and 
uncertainties that they face. 
The Directors consider the Annual Report and Accounts, 
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable 
and provides the information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Group’s position and performance, 
business model and strategy. 
On behalf of the Board
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair
24 March 2025
108	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES.
IN RESPECT OF THE ANNUAL REPORT AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OUR FINANCIALS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
OUR GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC REPORT

1.	
Our opinion is unmodified
We have audited the financial statements of IP Group plc (“the Company”) for 
the year ended 31 December 2024 which comprise the Consolidated Statement 
of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Consolidated Statement of Changes 
in Equity, the Company Balance Sheet, the Company Statement of Changes in 
Equity, and the related notes, including the accounting policies in note 1 to both the 
consolidated and the Company financial statements.
In our opinion: 
•	
the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of 
the parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2024 and of the Group’s loss for 
the year then ended;
•	
the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with 
UK-adopted international accounting standards;
•	
the parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in 
accordance with UK accounting standards, including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure 
Framework; and
•	
the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements 
of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion 
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) 
(“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities are described below. We believe 
that the audit evidence we have obtained is a sufficient and appropriate basis for our 
opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with our report to the Audit and Risk Committee.
We were first appointed as auditor by the shareholders on 13 May 2014. The period of 
total uninterrupted engagement is for the 11 financial years ended 31 December 2024. 
We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities under, and we remain independent of the 
Group in accordance with, UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard 
as applied to listed public interest entities. No non-audit services prohibited by that 
standard were provided.
Overview
Materiality: group financial 
statements as a whole
£12.3m (2023: £12.4m)
1.1% (2023: 0.9%) of Total Assets
Key audit matters
vs 2023
Recurring risks
Valuation of certain equity and 
debt investments (Group)
Recoverability of investment in 
subsidiaries (parent Company)
2.	
Key audit matters: our assessment of risks of 
material misstatement
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most 
significance in the audit of the financial statements and include the most significant 
assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by 
us, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the 
allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. 
We summarise below the key audit matters, in decreasing order of audit significance, 
in arriving at our audit opinion above, together with our key audit procedures to 
address those matters and our findings from those procedures in order that the 
Company’s members, as a body, may better understand the process by which we 
arrived at our audit opinion. These matters were addressed, and our findings are 
based on procedures undertaken, in the context of, and solely for the purpose of, our 
audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and 
consequently are incidental to that opinion, and we do not provide a separate opinion 
on these matters.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
109
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

The risk
Our response
Valuation of certain 
unquoted investments
(£632.3 million; 2023: 
£961.1 million)
	 Refer to page 101 (Audit 
and Risk Committee 
Report), page 137 
(accounting policy) 
and page 138 (financial 
disclosures).
Subjective Valuation
Certain of the unquoted investments within the total 
unquoted investments balance of £632.3m (2023: 
£891.4m) are subject to significant inherent estimation 
uncertainty in determining their valuation.
The Group’s investments are typically early stage 
investments, which are neither profitable nor revenue 
generative. The fair value of these investments is 
determined with reference to the prices of recent 
orderly funding rounds, adjusted for performance 
against business plans, product development progress, 
or expected cash- out dates. Other investments are 
valued using revenue multiples, or in the case of Istesso 
(the Group’s largest individual unquoted investment), 
discounted cash flow analysis.
As these investments are unquoted and illiquid the fair 
value is determined through the application of valuation 
techniques. The application of valuation techniques 
involves the exercise of significant judgement by the 
Group in relation to the assumptions and inputs into the 
respective models (e.g., adjustment to funding rounds). 
The factors considered in assessing which unquoted 
investments were subject to significant risk included 
investments requiring short term funding, investments 
which are individually significant in value, or those with 
positive or negative operational or financial developments.
The effect of these matters is that, as part of our 
risk assessment, we determined that the subjective 
estimates in fair value measurement of certain 
unquoted investments, as identified above, have a high 
degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range 
of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for 
the financial statements as a whole, and possibly many 
times that amount. We additionally identified a fraud risk 
associated to the valuation of certain unquoted equity 
and debt investments as set out in section 6, “Fraud and 
breaches of laws and regulations – ability to detect”.
We continue to perform procedures over limited 
and limited liability partnership interests, previously 
considered part of this Key Audit Matter in 2023. 
Following a reassessment of the risks associated with 
the balance of £58.1m (2023: £69.7m), we have not 
assessed this as part of the Key Audit Matter in the 
current year.
We performed the tests below, rather than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s 
controls, because the nature of the balance is such that we would expect to obtain 
audit evidence through fully substantive procedures.
Our procedures included:
•	
Investment process: We performed walkthrough testing of the valuation 
process undertaken and attended valuation committee meetings to obtain an 
understanding of the process and controls in operation.
•	
Portfolio understanding: We obtained an understanding of the investments 
included within the portfolio through inquiry (including of the valuation 
committee) and through our own independent research.
•	
Methodology choice: In the context of observed industry best practice and 
the provisions of the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation 
Guidelines, we assessed the appropriateness of the valuation method selected.
•	
Our valuation experience: We assessed key judgements affecting investee 
company valuations and compared key underlying financial data inputs to external 
sources, investee company audited accounts where available and management 
information as applicable. For certain of the life sciences investments (including, 
but not limited to, Istesso) we used our own medical specialist to assist us in 
understanding the investee businesses and challenging key judgements.
•	
For investments held at the price of recent investment, we obtained an 
understanding of the circumstances surrounding the transaction and assessed 
whether the transaction price represented fair value at the transaction date. We 
challenged whether this remains an appropriate basis on which to value the 
investment as at the year end, including by assessing the investee company’s 
performance against relevant milestones since the transaction. These factors 
drive the discount/premium applied to the transaction value.
•	
For investments valued based on discounted cash flows or market multiples, 
we assessed relevant assumptions including (where applicable) the discount 
rate applied, maintainable revenue or earnings assumption, the suitability of the 
comparable companies used and discount/premium applied.
•	
Our corporate finance expertise: In respect of the valuation of Istesso, we 
used our own valuations specialists to assist us in assessing the principles and 
appropriateness of the valuation methodology and independently providing a 
reasonable range for the discount rate.
•	
Assessing transparency: We considered the appropriateness, in accordance 
with relevant accounting standards, of the disclosures in respect of the valuation 
of certain equity and debt investments and the effect of changing one of more 
inputs to reasonable possible alternative valuation assumptions.
Our findings: 
We found the Group’s valuation of certain equity and debt investments to be 
balanced (2023: mildly cautious) and the related disclosures to be proportionate 
(2023: proportionate).
110	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

The risk
Our response
Recoverability of the 
parent Company’s 
investment in 
subsidiaries
(£331.1 million; 2023: 
£330.4 million)
	 Refer to page 162 
(accounting policy), 
and page 163 (financial 
disclosures).
Low risk, high value
The carrying amount of the parent Company’s 
investments in subsidiaries represents 35% (2023: 34%) 
of the parent Company’s total assets.
Their recoverability is not at a high risk of significant 
misstatement or subject to significant judgement.
However, due to their materiality in the context of 
the parent Company financial statements, this is 
considered to be the area that had the greatest effect 
on our overall parent Company audit.
We performed the tests below, rather than seeking to rely on any of the parent 
Company’s controls, because the nature of the balance is such that we would 
expect to obtain audit evidence primarily through the detailed procedures 
described.
Our procedures included:
•	
Tests of detail: We compared the carrying amount of 100% of investments with 
the relevant subsidiaries’ draft balance sheet to identify whether their net assets, 
being an approximation of the minimum recoverable amount, were in excess of 
their carrying amount.
•	
Assessing subsidiary audits: We considered the results of our work on all of 
those subsidiaries’ net assets.
Our findings: 
We found the balance of the parent Company’s investments in subsidiaries and 
the related impairment charge to be balanced (2023: balanced) and the related 
disclosures to be proportionate (2023 findings: proportionate).
We continue to perform procedures over the application of IFRS 10 in respect of Istesso Limited and IPG Cayman LP. However, given there have been no significant changes in the 
financing or organisational arrangements in the current financial year, we have not assessed this as one of the most significant risks in our current year audit and, therefore, it is 
not separately identified in our report as a key audit matter this year.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
111
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

3.	 Our application of materiality and an overview  
of the scope of our audit
Our application of materiality
Materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole was set at £12.3m (2023: 
£12.4m), determined with reference to a benchmark of Group total assets, of which it 
represents 1.1% (2023: 0.9%).
Materiality for the parent Company financial statements as a whole was set at £10.3m 
(2023: £10.3m), determined with reference to a benchmark of parent Company total 
assets, of which it represents 1.1% (2023: 1.1%).
In line with our audit methodology, our procedures on individual account balances 
and disclosures were performed to a lower threshold, performance materiality, so as 
to reduce to an acceptable level the risk that individually immaterial misstatements 
in individual account balances add up to a material amount across the financial 
statements as a whole.
Performance materiality was set at 75% (2023: 75%) of materiality for the financial 
statements as a whole, which equates to £9.2m (2023: £9.3m) for the Group and 
£7.7m (2023: £7.7m) for the parent Company. We applied this percentage in our 
determination of performance materiality because we did not identify any factors 
indicating an elevated level of risk.
We agreed to report to the Audit Committee any corrected or uncorrected identified 
misstatements exceeding £0.61m (2023: £0.62m), in addition to other identified 
misstatements that warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
Overview of the scope of our audit
This year, we applied the revised group auditing standard in our audit of the 
consolidated financial statements. The revised standard changes how an auditor 
approaches the identification of components, and how the audit procedures are 
planned and executed across components. In particular, the definition of a component 
has changed, shifting the focus from how the entity prepares financial information to 
how we, as the group auditor, plan to perform audit procedures to address group risks 
of material misstatement (“RMMs”).
We identified the Group as a whole to be a single component, having considered our 
evaluation of the Group’s legal structure, the investment valuation approach across 
the Group, the existence of common information systems, and our ability to perform 
audit procedures centrally.
Accordingly, we performed audit procedures on the single component. The audit was 
performed using the materiality and performance materiality levels set out right.
Impact of controls on our Group audit
The Group relies on a number of IT systems and applications to record financial 
transactions. We identified the main finance IT system and the systems used to 
monitor and maintain investment data as relevant to our Group audit. Our IT auditors 
assisted us in obtaining an understanding of the design of general IT controls and 
automated controls addressing significant risk areas and process risk points within the 
journals process.
We identified certain control deficiencies in relation to journal entries. In response, we 
conducted incremental risk assessment procedures to determine the implications 
of the deficiencies identified on each financial statement caption. Ultimately, we 
assessed the impact on our approach was limited.
Consistent with our approach noted within the key audit matters, we did not plan to 
rely on any of the Group’s automated or manual controls in relation to any areas of 
our audit (including in relation to the systems which monitor and maintain investment 
data). This is because the nature of the majority of the Group’s balances, including the 
key audit matter, are such that we would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily 
from substantive audit procedures as that approach was either considered more 
appropriate to gain sufficient evidence over the relevant balance or more efficient.
Total assets
£1,151.1m 
(2023: £1,411.6m)
Group materiality
£12.3m
(2023: £12.4m)
Total assets
Group materiality
£12.3m
Whole financial statements 
materiality (2023: £12.4m)
£9.2m
Whole financial statements 
performance materiality  
(2023: £9.3m)
£0.6m
Misstatements reported to the 
Audit and Risk Committee  
(2023: £0.6m)
112	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

4.	 The impact of climate change on our audit
In planning our audit we have considered the potential impacts of climate change on 
the Group’s business and its financial statements.
Climate change impacts the Group principally through the valuation of investments 
and through potential reputational risk associated with the Group’s strategy. The 
Group’s exposure to climate change is primarily through the investee companies, as 
the key valuation assumptions and estimates could be impacted by climate risks, 
for example where a new low carbon technology is more likely to attract greater 
investment; this is most apparent in the Cleantech investments.
As part of our audit we have made enquiries of Directors to understand the extent of 
the potential impact of climate change risk on the Group’s financial statements and 
the Group’s preparedness. We have performed a risk assessment of how the impact of 
climate change may affect the financial statements and our audit, in particular over 
the valuation of unquoted investments and the related key audit matter above.
Given the nature of the current investment portfolio, the valuation methods and 
investing strategy of the Group, we consider that climate risks do not have a significant 
effect on our key audit matters.
We have read the disclosure of climate related information in the front half of the 
annual report and considered consistency with the financial statements and our 
audit knowledge.
5.	 Going concern 
The Directors have prepared the financial statements on the going concern basis as 
they do not intend to liquidate the Group or the parent Company or to cease their 
operations, and as they have concluded that the Group’s and the parent Company’s 
financial position means that this is realistic. They have also concluded that there 
are no material uncertainties that could have cast significant doubt over their ability 
to continue as a going concern for at least a year from the date of approval of the 
financial statements (“the going concern period”).
We used our knowledge of the Group, its industry, and the general economic 
environment to identify the inherent risks to its business model and analysed how 
those risks might affect the Group’s and parent Company’s financial resources 
or ability to continue operations over the going concern period. The risks that we 
considered most likely to adversely affect the Group’s and parent Company’s available 
financial resources and metrics relevant to debt covenants over this period were:
•	
Significant additional funding being made into current and future investee 
companies; and
•	
Reduction in realisations over the period including from listed investments.
We considered whether these risks could plausibly affect the liquidity or covenant 
compliance in the going concern period by comparing severe, but plausible downside 
scenarios that could arise from these risks individually and collectively against 
the level of available financial resources and covenants indicated by the Group’s 
financial forecasts.
We considered whether the going concern disclosure in notes 1 to both the Group and 
parent Company financial statements gives a full and accurate description of the 
Directors’ assessment of going concern.
Our conclusions based on this work:
•	
we consider that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the 
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate;
•	
we have not identified, and concur with the Directors’ assessment that there is 
not, a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that, individually or 
collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group’s or parent Company’s ability 
to continue as a going concern for the going concern period;
•	
we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ 
statement in notes 1 to both the Group and parent Company financial statements 
on the use of the going concern basis of accounting with no material uncertainties 
that may cast significant doubt over the Group and parent Company’s use of that 
basis for the going concern period, and we found the going concern disclosure 
in notes 1 to both the Group and the parent Company financial statements to be 
acceptable; and
•	
the related statement under the UK Listing Rules set out on page 107 is materially 
consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
However, as we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as subsequent 
events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were 
reasonable at the time they were made, the above conclusions are not a guarantee 
that the Group or the parent Company will continue in operation.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
113
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT. 
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

6.	 Fraud and breaches of laws and regulations  
– ability to detect
Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement 
due to fraud
To identify risks of material misstatement due to fraud (“fraud risks”) we assessed 
events or conditions that could indicate an incentive or pressure to commit fraud or 
provide an opportunity to commit fraud.
Our risk assessment procedures included:
•	
Enquiring of Directors and the Audit and Risk Committee as to the Group’s high-
level policies and procedures to prevent and detect fraud, including the internal 
audit function, and the Group’s channel for “whistleblowing” as well as whether they 
have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud;
•	
Reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;
•	
Consideration of the Group’s remuneration policies, such as the Annual Incentive 
Scheme (“AIS”), and the associated performance targets; and
•	
Our forensic professionals assisted us in identifying key fraud risks. This included 
holding a discussion with the engagement partner and engagement manager 
and assisting with designing relevant audit procedures to respond to the identified 
fraud risks.
We communicated identified fraud risks throughout the audit team and remained 
alert to any indications of fraud throughout the audit.
As required by auditing standards, and taking into account our overall knowledge 
of the control environment, we performed procedures to address the risk of 
management override of controls, in particular the risk that management may be in a 
position to make inappropriate accounting entries and the risk of bias in accounting 
estimates and judgements such as valuation of certain unquoted investments.
On this audit we assessed there to be no fraud risk related to revenue recognition. 
We obtained an understanding of all revenue streams and assessed that revenue 
recognition is simple in nature, with no material estimation or judgement.
We identified a fraud risk relating to the valuation of certain equity and debt 
investments held on the balance sheet. As these investments are unquoted and illiquid, 
they are valued using valuation techniques. Such techniques are subjective and 
involve the exercise of judgement by the Group over areas such as the determination 
of discounts or premiums applied to transaction values, market multiples and discount 
rate. In addition, the valuation of the equity and debt investment portfolio drives the 
remuneration of Directors and is considered a key indicator for their performance. Due 
to the highly judgemental nature of these valuations, the reliance on unobservable 
inputs and the linkage to Directors’ remuneration, we consider there to be increased 
risk of fraud in relation to the valuation of certain equity and debt investments. Further 
detail is set out in the key audit matter disclosures in section 2 of this report.
We performed procedures including:
•	
Identifying journal entries to test based on risk criteria and comparing the 
identified entries to supporting documentation. These included postings made to 
unexpected account combinations.
•	
Assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are 
indicative of a potential bias, including assessing the valuation of certain equity 
and debt investments for bias.
Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement 
due to non-compliance with laws and regulations
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to 
have a material effect on the financial statements from our general commercial and 
sector experience and through discussion with the Directors (as required by auditing 
standards), and discussed with the Directors and other management the policies and 
procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations.
As certain entities within the Group are regulated, our assessment of risks involved 
gaining an understanding of the control environment including the entity’s procedures 
for complying with regulatory requirements.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout our team and 
remained alert to any indications of non- compliance throughout the audit.
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the financial statements varies 
considerably.
Firstly, the Group is subject to laws and regulations that directly affect the financial 
statements including financial reporting legislation (including related companies 
legislation), distributable profits legislation and taxation legislation including the 
Substantial Shareholding Exemption (“SSE”), and we assessed the extent of compliance 
with these laws and regulations as part of our procedures on the related financial 
statement items.
Secondly, the Group is subject to many other laws and regulations where the 
consequences of non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts or 
disclosures in the financial statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or 
litigation. We identified the following areas as those most likely to have such an effect: 
data protection laws, anti-bribery and employment law. Auditing standards limit the 
required audit procedures to identify non-compliance with these laws and regulations 
to enquiry of the Directors and other management and inspection of regulatory and 
legal correspondence, if any. Therefore, if a breach of operational regulations is not 
disclosed to us or evidence from relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect 
that breach.
114	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or breaches 
of law or regulation
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that we 
may not have detected some material misstatements in the financial statements, 
even though we have properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with 
auditing standards. For example, the further removed non- compliance with laws and 
regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, 
the less likely the inherently limited procedures required by auditing standards would 
identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of non-detection of fraud, 
as these may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or 
the override of internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect material 
misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-compliance or fraud and 
cannot be expected to detect non- compliance with all laws and regulations.
7.	
We have nothing to report on the other information 
in the Annual Report
The Directors are responsible for the other information presented in the Annual Report 
together with the financial statements. Our opinion on the financial statements does 
not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, 
except as explicitly stated below, any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether, 
based on our financial statements audit work, the information therein is materially 
misstated or inconsistent with the financial statements or our audit knowledge. 
Based solely on that work we have not identified material misstatements in the other 
information.
Strategic report and Directors’ report
Based solely on our work on the other information:
•	
we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic report and the 
Directors’ report;
•	
in our opinion the information given in those reports for the financial year is 
consistent with the financial statements; and
•	
in our opinion those reports have been prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006.
Directors’ Remuneration Report
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been 
properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Disclosures of emerging and principal risks  
and longer-term viability
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there is a material 
inconsistency between the Directors’ disclosures in respect of emerging and principal 
risks and the viability statement, and the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
Based on those procedures, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in 
relation to:
•	
the Directors’ confirmation within the viability statement on page 49 that they have 
carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the 
Group, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, 
solvency and liquidity;
•	
the risks and internal controls disclosures on page 38 describing these risks and 
how emerging risks are identified, and explaining how they are being managed 
and mitigated; and
•	
the Directors’ explanation in the viability statement of how they have assessed 
the prospects of the Group, over what period they have done so and why they 
considered that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they 
have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation 
and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, 
including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications 
or assumptions.
We are also required to review the viability statement, set out on page 49 under the 
UK Listing Rules. Based on the above procedures, we have concluded that the above 
disclosures are materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit 
knowledge.
Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the context of only the knowledge 
acquired during our financial statements audit. As we cannot predict all future events 
or conditions and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent 
with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made, the absence 
of anything to report on these statements is not a guarantee as to the Group’s and 
parent Company’s longer- term viability.
Corporate governance disclosures
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there is a material 
inconsistency between the Directors’ corporate governance disclosures and the 
financial statements and our audit knowledge.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
115
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each of the following is materially 
consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge:
•	
the Directors’ statement that they consider that the annual report and financial 
statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides 
the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s position and 
performance, business model and strategy;
•	
the section of the annual report describing the work of the Audit Committee, 
including the significant issues that the audit committee considered in relation to 
the financial statements, and how these issues were addressed; and
•	
the section of the annual report that describes the review of the effectiveness of 
the Group’s risk management and internal control systems.
We are required to review the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating 
to the Group’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code 
specified by the UK Listing Rules for our review. We have nothing to report in this respect.
8.	 We have nothing to report on the other matters on 
which we are required to report by exception 
Under the Companies Act 2006, we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
•	
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent Company, or 
returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited 
by us; or
•	
the parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting 
records and returns; or
•	
certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
•	
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
We have nothing to report in these respects.
9.	 Respective responsibilities 
Directors’ responsibilities
As explained more fully in their statement set out on page 108, the Directors are 
responsible for: the preparation of the financial statements including being satisfied 
that they give a true and fair view; such internal control as they determine is 
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from 
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; assessing the Group and 
parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, 
matters related to going concern; and using the going concern basis of accounting 
unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the parent Company or to cease 
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial 
statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or 
error, and to issue our opinion in an auditor’s report. Reasonable assurance is a high 
level of assurance, but does not guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance 
with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements 
can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in 
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of 
users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
A fuller description of our responsibilities is provided on the FRC’s website at  
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
The Company is required to include these financial statements in an annual financial 
report prepared under Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 4.1.17R and 4.1.18R. 
This auditor’s report provides no assurance over whether the annual financial report 
has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
10.	 The purpose of our audit work and to whom we owe 
our responsibilities 
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with 
Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and the terms of our engagement 
by the Company. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the 
Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s 
report, and the further matters we are required to state to them in accordance with 
the terms agreed with the Company, and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent 
permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the 
Company and the Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, 
or for the opinions we have formed.
Jatin Patel (Senior Statutory Auditor) 
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP, Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants  
15 Canada Square 
London, E14 5GL
24 March 2025
116	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT.
TO THE MEMBERS OF IP GROUP PLC
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Note
2024
£m
2023
£m
Portfolio return and revenue
Change in fair value of equity and debt investments
13
(246.1)
(110.9)
Gain/(loss) on disposal of equity and debt investments
15
63.7
(10.8)
Change in fair value of limited and limited liability partnership interests
14
(12.6)
(38.8)
Revenue from services and other income
4
5.5
5.9
(189.5)
(154.6)
Administrative expenses 
Carried interest plan and other deal incentives credit
22
7.9
4.7
Share-based payment charge
21
(1.9)
(2.6)
Other administrative expenses
8
(25.3)
(28.0)
(19.3)
(25.9)
Operating loss
7
(208.8)
(180.5)
Finance income 
8.8
9.8
Finance costs
(6.7)
(5.6)
Loss before taxation
(206.7)
(176.3)
Taxation
10
(0.3)
1.9
Loss for the year 
(207.0)
(174.4)
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to the income statement	
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations
(3.0)
(0.4)
Total comprehensive loss for the year
(210.0)
(174.8)
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent
(205.6)
(171.3)
Non-controlling interest
(4.4)
(3.5)
(210.0)
(174.8)
Loss per share
Basic (p)
11
(19.97)
(16.53)
Diluted (p)
11
(19.97)
(16.53)
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
117
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION.
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2024
Note
2024
£m
2023
£m
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Goodwill
0.4
0.4
Property, plant and equipment
0.8
1.4
Joint venture investment
0.6
0.6
Portfolio:
Equity investments
13
713.8
1,011.5
Debt investments
13
51.6
83.7
Limited and limited liability partnership interests
14
58.1
69.7
Receivable on sale of debt and equity investments
15, 17
18.5
7.8
Total non-current assets
843.8
1,175.1
Current assets
Assets held for sale
13
13.9
–
Trade and other receivables
16
6.3
8.2
Receivable on sale of debt and equity investments
15, 17
1.6
1.4
Deposits
3
170.0
126.0
Cash and cash equivalents
3
115.6
100.9
Total current assets
307.4
236.5
Total assets
1,151.2
1,411.6
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
Called up share capital
20
19.5
21.3
Share premium account
102.5
102.5
Capital redemption reserve
20
1.8
–
Retained earnings
842.2
1,075.6
Total equity attributable to equity holders
966.0
1,199.4
Non-controlling interest
(13.5)
(9.1)
Total equity
952.5
1,190.3
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
18
12.5
17.1
Borrowings
19
6.3
6.3
Total current liabilities
18.8
23.4
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
19
122.8
128.9
Carried interest plan liability
22
27.3
38.0
Deferred tax liability
10
4.5
4.8
Loans from limited partners of consolidated funds
19
19.9
19.8
Other non-current liabilities
5.4
6.4
Total non-current liabilities
179.9
197.9
Total liabilities
198.7
221.3
Total equity and liabilities
1,151.2
1,411.6
Registered number: 04204490
The accompanying notes on pages 121 to 159 form 
an integral part of the financial statements on 
pages 117 to 174. The financial statements were approved 
by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 
24 March 2025 and were signed on its behalf by:
Greg Smith	
David Baynes
Chief Executive Officer	
Chief Financial Officer
118	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Note
2024 
£m
2023 
£m
Operating activities
Loss before taxation for the period
(206.7)
(176.3)
Adjusted for:
Change in fair value of equity and debt investments
13
246.1
110.9
(Gain)/Loss on disposal of equity investments
15
(63.7)
10.8
Change in fair value of limited and limited liability partnership interests
14
12.6
38.8
Carried interest plan and other deal incentives credit
22
(7.9)
(4.7)
Carried interest scheme payments
22
(2.5)
(1.3)
Share-based payment charge
21
1.9
2.6
Finance income
(8.8)
(9.8)
Finance costs
6.7
5.6
Depreciation of right-of-use asset, property, plant and equipment 
0.6
0.6
Corporate finance fees settled in the form of portfolio company equity
–
(0.1)
Changes in working capital
(Increase)/Decrease in trade and other receivables
16
(0.7)
1.3
Decrease in trade and other payables 
18
(7.3)
(0.3)
Drawdowns from limited partners of consolidated funds
0.1
0.3
Other operating cash flows
Interest received
4.5
3.7
Net cash outflow from operating activities
(25.1)
(17.9)
Investing activities
Purchase of equity and debt investments
13
(60.8)
(63.4)
Investment in limited and limited liability partnership funds
14
(2.2)
(9.8)
Investment in joint venture
–
(0.6)
Interest received on deposits
5.9
4.1
Cash flow to deposits
(230.0)
(191.7)
Cash flow from deposits
186.6
218.4
Proceeds from sale of equity and debt investments
15
182.2
37.7
Distribution from limited partnership funds
14
1.2
0.9
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities
82.9
(4.4)
Financing activities
Dividends paid
26
–
(13.0)
Repurchase of own shares – treasury shares
20
(29.6)
(0.1)
Lease principal payment
(0.4)
(0.5)
Interest paid
(6.8)
(5.5)
Repayment of EIB loan facility
19
(6.1)
(6.2)
Drawdown of loan facility 
19
–
60.0
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities
(42.9)
34.7
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
14.9
12.4
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
100.9
88.7
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
(0.2)
(0.2)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
115.6
100.9
The accompanying notes on pages 121 to 
159 form an integral part of the financial 
statements.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
119
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

1	
Share premium – Amount subscribed for 
share capital in excess of nominal value, net 
of directly attributable issue costs.
2	 Retained earnings – Cumulative net gains 
and losses recognised in the consolidated 
statement of comprehensive income net of 
associated share-based payments credits 
and distributions to shareholders.
3	 Non-controlling interest – Share of losses 
attributable to the Limited Partners of IP 
Venture Fund II LP.
4	 Currency translation – Reflects currency 
translation differences on reserves non-GBP 
functional currency subsidiaries. Exchange 
differences on translating foreign operations 
are presented before tax.
5	 Purchase of treasury shares – during 2024, 
the Company purchased 45,280,605 ordinary 
shares (2023: 200,302 ordinary shares), with 
an aggregate value of £0.9m (2023: £0.1k) 
which were initially held in treasury. These 
were subsequently used to settle employee 
share based payments of 4,481,489 prior to 
the remainder being cancelled in September 
2024 along with a further 26,493,520 treasury 
shares held at the start of the year which 
were also cancelled at the same time. A 
further 20,609,101 shares with an aggregate 
value of £0.5m were purchased in the 
period September to December 2024 and 
immediately cancelled. The nominal value 
of the cancelled treasury share has been 
added to the Capital redemption reserve. 
6	 Equity-settled share-based payments 
– amounts recognised in respect of the 
Group’s share-based payments schemes 
recognised as a subsidiary investment in the 
Company accounts with a corresponding 
entry against equity.
7	 Ordinary dividends – there were no 
dividends paid in 2024 (2023: £13.0m total; 
£13.0m cash). No new shares were issued 
in respect of the scrip dividend (2023: no 
shares issued).
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
Share 
capital 
£m
Share 
premium1
£m
Capital 
redemption 
reserve5
 £m
Retained 
earnings2 
£m
Total 
£m
Non-
controlling 
interest3
£m
Total 
equity
£m 
At 1 January 2023 
21.3
102.5
–
1,257.9 
1,381.7 
(5.6)
1,376.1
Total comprehensive income for 
the period
Loss for the year
–
–
–
(170.9)
(170.9)
(3.5)
(174.4)
Currency translation4
–
–
–
(0.9)
(0.9)
–
(0.9)
Total comprehensive income for 
the period
–
–
–
(171.8)
(171.8)
(3.5)
(175.3)
Transactions with owners, recorded 
directly in equity
Purchase of treasury shares5
–
–
–
(0.1)
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
Equity-settled share-based payments6
–
–
–
2.6
2.6
–
2.6
Ordinary dividends7
–
–
–
(13.0)
(13.0)
–
(13.0)
Total contributions by and distributions 
to owners
–
–
–
(10.5)
(10.5)
–
(10.5)
At 1 January 2024 
21.3
102.5
–
1,075.6
1,199.4
(9.1)
1,190.3
Total comprehensive income for 
the period
Loss for the year
–
–
–
(202.6)
(202.6)
(4.4)
(207.0)
Currency translation4
–
–
–
(3.1)
(3.1)
–
(3.1)
Total comprehensive income for 
the period
–
–
–
(205.7)
(205.7)
(4.4)
(210.1)
Transactions with owners, recorded 
directly in equity
Purchase of treasury shares5
(1.8)
–
1.8
(29.6)
(29.6)
–
(29.6)
Equity-settled share-based payments6
–
–
–
1.9
1.9
–
1.9
Ordinary dividends7
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Total contributions by and distributions 
to owners
(1.8)
–
1.8
(27.7)
(27.7)
–
(27.7)
At 31 December 2024
19.5
102.5
1.8
842.2
966.0
(13.5)
952.5
120	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

1. Basis of preparation
A) Basis of preparation
The Annual Report and Accounts of IP Group plc (“IP Group” or the “Company”) 
and its subsidiary companies (together, the “Group”) are for the year ended 
31 December 2024. The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the 
financial statements are set out below. The policies have been consistently applied 
to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. The Group financial statements 
have been prepared and approved by the Directors in accordance with UK–adopted 
international accounting standards (“UK–adopted IFRS”).
The preparation of financial statements in compliance with IFRS requires the use of 
certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires Group management to exercise 
judgement in the most appropriate selection of the Group’s accounting policies. The 
areas where significant judgements and estimates have been made in preparing the 
financial statements and their effect are disclosed in note 2. 
The financial statements are prepared on a historic cost bases except that the 
following assets and liabilities are stated at their fair value.
Going concern
The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis. The Directors have 
completed a detailed financial forecast alongside severe but plausible scenario–
based downside stress–testing, including the impact of declining portfolio values and 
a reduced ability to generate portfolio realisations. 
At the balance sheet date, the Group had cash and deposits of £285.6m, providing 
liquidity for around three years’ operating expenses and portfolio investment at recent 
levels, and scheduled debt repayments. Furthermore, the Group has a portfolio of 
investments valued at around £0.9bn, which is anticipated to provide further liquidity 
over the forecast period. Accordingly, our forecasting indicates that the Group and it’s 
parent Company has adequate resources to enable it to meet its obligations including 
its debt covenants and to continue in operational existence for at least the next twelve 
months from the approval date of the accounts. For further details see the Group’s 
viability statement on page 49.
Changes in accounting policies
(i) New standards, interpretations and amendments effective from  
1 January 2024
No new standards, interpretations and amendments effective in the year have had a 
material effect on the Group’s financial statements.
(ii) New standards, interpretations and amendments not yet effective
No new standards, interpretations and amendments not yet effective are expected to 
have a material effect on the Group’s future financial statements. 
The impact of the following is under assessment: IFRS 18 ‘Primary financial statements’, 
which will become effective in the consolidated Group financial statements for the 
financial year ending 31 December 2027, subject to UK endorsement. 
B) Basis of consolidation
IFRS 10 Investment Entity Exemption
IFRS 10 defines an investment entity as one which: 
a.	 Obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing those 
investors with investment management services 
b.	 Commits to its investors that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for 
returns from capital appreciation, investment income or both 
c.	 Measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on 
a fair value basis 
We believe that IP Group plc does not meet this definition of an investment entity with 
the key factors behind this conclusion being:
•	
the absence of specific exit strategies for early–stage assets (indicating condition 
(b) above is not satisfied)
•	
the ability to hold investments indefinitely (indicating condition (b) above is not 
satisfied)
•	
the flexibility to explore the direct commercialisation of intellectual property within 
the Group if that is determined to be the most attractive means of generating 
value for shareholders. (indicating condition (a) above is not satisfied)
Accordingly, we have applied IFRS 10 consolidation principles for each group of entities 
as follows:
(i) Subsidiaries
Where the Group has control over an entity, it is classified as a subsidiary. Typically, 
the Group owns a non–controlling interest in its portfolio companies; however, in 
certain circumstances, the Group takes a controlling interest and hence categorises 
the portfolio company as a subsidiary. As per IFRS 10, an entity is classed as under the 
control of the Group when all three of the following elements are present: power over 
the entity; exposure to variable returns from the entity; and the ability of the Group to 
use its power to affect those variable returns. 
In situations where the Company has the practical ability to direct the relevant 
activities of the investee without holding the majority of the voting rights, it is 
considered that de facto control exists. In determining whether de facto control exists 
the Group considers the relevant facts and circumstances, including:
•	
The size of the Company’s voting rights relative to both the size and dispersion of 
other parties who hold voting rights;
•	
Substantive potential voting rights held by the Company and by other parties;
•	
Other contractual arrangements; and
•	
Historic patterns in voting attendance.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
121
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

In assessing the IFRS 10 control criteria in respect of the Group’s private portfolio 
companies, direction of the relevant activities of the company is usually considered 
to be exercised by the company’s board, therefore the key control consideration is 
whether the Group currently has a majority of board seats on a given company’s 
board, or is able to obtain a majority of board seats via the exercise of its voting rights. 
Control is reassessed whenever facts and circumstances indicate that there may be a 
change in any of these elements of control.
The consolidated financial statements present the results of the Company and its 
subsidiaries as if they formed a single entity. Intercompany transactions and balances 
between Group companies are therefore eliminated in full. The consolidated financial 
statements incorporate the results of business combinations using the acquisition 
method. In the statement of financial position, the acquiree’s identifiable assets and 
liabilities are initially recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date. Contingent 
liabilities dependent on the disposed value of an associated investment are only 
recognised when the fair value is above the associated threshold. The results of 
acquired operations are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income from the date on which control is obtained. They are consolidated until the 
date on which control ceases.
(ii) Associates/portfolio companies
The majority of the Group’s portfolio companies are deemed to be Associates, as 
the Group has significant influence (generally accompanied by a shareholding of 
between 20% and 50% of the voting rights) but not control. A small number of the 
Group’s portfolio companies are controlled and hence consolidated, as per section 
(i) above.
As permitted under IAS 28, the Group elects to hold investments in Associates at fair 
value through profit and loss in accordance with IFRS 9. This treatment is specified by 
IAS 28 Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures, which permits investments held by 
a venture capital organisation or similar entity to be excluded from its measurement 
methodology requirements where those investments are designated, upon initial 
recognition, as at fair value through profit or loss and accounted for in accordance 
with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. Therefore, no associates are presented on the 
consolidated statement of financial position.
Changes in fair value of associates are recognised in profit or loss in the period of 
the change. The Group has no interests in Associates through which it carries on its 
operating business. During 2023, the Group made a £0.6m investment into a Joint 
Venture established in preparation for potential fund operations in China. Joint 
ventures are held at fair value with any change in value recognised through the 
income statement. 
The disclosures required by Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006 for associated 
undertakings are included in note 13 of the Company financial statements. Similarly, 
those investments which may not have qualified as an Associate but fall within the 
wider scope of significant holdings and so are subject to Section 409 disclosures of the 
Companies Act 2006 are included in note 11 of the Company financial statements.
(iii) Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships (“Limited 
Partnerships”)
a) Consolidated Limited Partnership fund holdings
The Group has a holding in the following Limited Partnership fund, which it determines 
that it controls and hence consolidates on a line by line basis:
Name
Interest in Limited 
partnership
%
IP Venture Fund II LP (“IPVFII”)
33.3
In order to determine whether the Group controls the above funds, it has considered 
the IFRS 10 control model and related application guidance. In respect of IPVFII, the 
Group has power via its role as fund manager of the partnership, and exposure to 
variable returns via its 33.3% ownership interest, resulting in the conclusion that the 
Group controls and hence consolidates the fund.
b) Other non-consolidated Limited Partnership fund holdings
In addition to Limited Partnerships where Group entities act as general partner and 
investment manager, the Group has interests in three further entities which are 
managed by third parties:
Name
Interest in Limited 
partnership
%
IPG Cayman LP 
58.1
UCL Technology Fund LP (“UCL Fund”)
46.4
Technikos LLP (“Technikos”)
17.8
The rationale for IPG Cayman LP’s categorisation as a non-consolidated fund is 
considered a significant accounting judgment and is set out in note 2.
The Group has a 46.4% interest in the total capital commitments of the UCL Fund. The 
Group has committed £24.8m to the fund alongside the European Investment Fund 
(“EIF”), University College London and other investors. Participation in the UCL Fund 
provides the Group with the opportunity to generate financial returns and visibility of 
potential intellectual property from across University College London’s research base. 
The Group has an 17.8% interest in the total capital commitments of Technikos, a fund 
with an exclusive pipeline agreement with Oxford University’s Institute of Biomedical 
Engineering.
See note 25 for disclosure of outstanding commitments in respect of Limited 
Partnerships.
1. Basis of preparation continued
122	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

1. Basis of preparation continued
iv) Other third-party funds under management
In addition to the Limited Partnership fund IPVFII, described above, the Group also 
manages other third-party funds, including within its Parkwalk Advisors business unit, 
and on behalf of Australian superannuation fund Hostplus. In both cases, the Group 
has no direct beneficial interest in the assets being managed, and its sole exposure 
to variable returns relates to management fees and performance fees payable on 
exits above a specified hurdle. As a result, the Group is not deemed to control these 
managed assets under IFRS10 and they are not consolidated.
v) Non–controlling interests
The total comprehensive income, assets and liabilities of non–wholly owned entities 
are attributed to owners of the parent and to the non–controlling interests in 
proportion to their relative ownership interests. 
vi) Business combinations
The Group accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method from 
the date that control is transferred to the Group (see (i) Subsidiaries above). Both 
the identifiable net assets and the consideration transferred in the acquisition are 
measured at fair value at the date of acquisition and transaction costs are expensed 
as incurred. Goodwill arising on acquisitions is tested at least annually for impairment. 
In instances where the Group owns a non–controlling stake prior to acquisition the 
step acquisition method is applied, and any gain or losses on the fair value of the pre–
acquisition holding is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income.
C) Other accounting policies
Regulated capital
Top Technology Ventures Limited and Parkwalk Advisors Ltd, are Group subsidiaries 
which are subject to external capital requirements imposed by the Financial Conduct 
Authority (“FCA”). Similarly, the Group’s subsidiary in Hong Kong IP Group Greater China 
Services Limited is subject to external capital requirements imposed by the Securities 
and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”). As such these entities must ensure that 
they have sufficient capital to satisfy their respective requirements. The Group ensures 
it remains compliant with these requirements as described in their respective financial 
statements.
Cash flow statement classification of portfolio investments
Cash flow relating to portfolio investments have been presented as investing cash 
flows as opposed to cash flows from operating activities. Management considers 
this to be an appropriate classification reflecting the fact that these cashflows are 
allocated towards resources intended to generate future income and cash flows, in 
line with the definition of investing activities within IAS 7.
2. Significant accounting estimates and judgements
The Directors have made the following judgements and estimates that have had 
the most significant effect on the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities in 
the consolidated financial statements. Estimates and judgements are continually 
evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, such as 
expectations of future events, and are believed to be reasonable under the 
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and 
assumptions which have the most significant effects on the carrying amounts of the 
assets and liabilities in the financial statements are discussed below.
(i) Valuation of unquoted equity and debt investments and limited 
partnership interests (significant estimate)
The Group’s accounting policy in respect of the valuation of unquoted equity and debt 
investments is set out in note 13, and in respect of limited partnership interests in note 
14. In applying this policy, the key areas over which judgement are exercised include:
•	
Consideration of whether a funding round is at arm’s length and therefore 
representative of fair value.
•	
The relevance of the price of recent investment as an input to fair value, which 
typically becomes more subjective as the time elapsed between the recent 
investment date and the balance sheet date increases.
•	
In the case of companies with complex capital structures, the appropriate 
methodology for assigning value to different classes of equity based on their 
differing economic rights.
•	
Where an upwards or downwards calibration adjustment to a funding transaction 
valuation to reflect positive or negative developments within the company in 
question, the size of the adjustment made.
•	
Where using valuation methods such as discounted cash flows or revenue 
multiples, the assumptions around inputs including the drug development timeline, 
probability of clinical trial success, the selection of relevant comparable deal sizes, 
the probability of securing a pharmaceutical partner, drug sales profiles, royalty 
rates, discount rates and drug development costs 
•	
Where valuations are based on future events such as sales processes or 
future funding rounds, the appropriate level of execution risk to be applied to 
the anticipated event when assessing its valuation impact as at the balance 
sheet date.
•	
Debt investments typically represent convertible debt; in such cases judgement 
is exercised in respect of the estimated equity value received on conversion of 
the loan.
•	
For limited partnership investments, the above considerations are applied to the 
fund in question’s equity and debt investments in determining whether the fund 
manager’s Net Asset Value statement values are appropriate.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
123
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Valuations are based on management’s judgement after consideration of the above 
and upon available information believed to be reliable, which may be affected by 
conditions in the financial markets. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the investment 
valuations, the estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have 
been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and the differences could be 
material. Note 13 provides disclosure details on sensitivity and estimation uncertainty. 
Critical estimates in respect of the Group’s investment in Istesso Limited, including 
DCF model assumptions in respect of the Phase 2b success rates, selected pharma 
partner deal size, pharma partnership probability and royalty rates including sensitivity 
disclosures in respect of these estimates are disclosed in Note 13. 
(ii) Application of IFRS 10 in respect of Istesso Limited and IPG Cayman LP 
(significant judgement)
The judgments in respect of non-consolidation of Istesso Limited and IPG Cayman 
LP remain unchanged from the conclusion of our assessment in the prior year, and 
there have been no material changes in the facts and circumstances during the year. 
The specific considerations in respect of Istesso Limited and IPG Cayman LP are set 
out below:
Istesso Limited
In respect of Istesso Limited, although the Group has a 56.5% undiluted economic 
interest in the company, the Group holds a significant proportion of its equity via non–
voting shares resulting in it holding less than 50% of the voting rights at the company. 
Under Istesso’s Articles of Association, strategic and day-to-day decisions over running 
of the business rest with Istesso’s board of directors rather than through shareholder 
voting rights attached to direct ownership of equity interests held in the entity. In this 
respect, power over Istesso is exercised predominantly through directors’ meetings, on 
which IP Group is not deemed to have majority representation. As such, the relationship 
between Istesso and IP Group is designed in such a way that “shareholder” voting rights 
are not the dominant factor in deciding who directs the investee’s relevant activities, but 
it is the directors who do so. IP Group does not control the board of Istesso Limited via 
a majority of board directors, and is specifically prevented from appointing additional 
directors to gain control of the board via restrictions in Istesso’s Articles of Association. 
During the year, the Group advanced a further £10m convertible loan to Istesso 
Limited, being the second tranche of a total £23.5m convertible loan which was legally 
committed in 2023 and whose drawdown therefore did not have any additional 
substantive impact. This was in addition to a £10m convertible loan which was 
provided in 2022. The terms of the loans contain specific provisions preventing their 
conversion where this would result in IP Group obtaining control of Istesso. 
Based on an updated control assessment, including considerations around whether 
IP Group has ‘de facto’ control of Istesso including inter alia the number of voting shares 
held by the Group and its connected parties and the dispersion of other parties’ voting 
rights, we have concluded that the Group does not control Istesso Limited under IFRS 10.
Had the Directors concluded that consolidation in the current year was appropriate, 
the impact on the Group Balance Sheet would have been to recognise Istesso 
Limited’s assets and liabilities and to recognise additional intangible assets including 
goodwill based on the fair value of the company at acquisition. The impact on the 
Group Income Statement would have been the recognition of Istesso Limited’s costs 
from the point of acquisition. Furthermore, any subsequent fair value movements in 
the debt and equity of Istesso Limited would not be recognised until the point where 
IP Group was no longer deemed to control Istesso Limited.
IPG Cayman LP
The Group’s US portfolio is held via a limited partnership fund, IPG Cayman LP, which 
was set up in 2018 to facilitate third-party investment into this portfolio. The fund is 
managed by Longview Innovations Inc., formerly an operating subsidiary of the Group. 
Prior to 2021, the Group was judged to control both IPG Cayman LP and Longview 
innovations Inc. under IFRS 10 and hence both entities were consolidated.
In 2021, several events took place which caused us to reassess the Group’s control of 
both entities:
•	
IPG Cayman LP raised additional third–party funds in the first half of 2021, which 
reduced the Group’s stake in the fund from 80.7% to 58.1% and revised the fund’s 
Limited Partnership Agreement to reduced the Group’s rights to replace the fund 
manager.
•	
Investors in the 2021 IPG Cayman LP funding round hold a 5 year option to 
subscribe additional funds which, if exercised, would result in IP Group holding less 
than 50% in the fund.
•	
In November 2021 the Group disposed of its equity in IPG Cayman LP’s fund 
manager, Longview Innovations Inc. and hence no longer controls the fund 
manager.
As a result of these changes, our control assessment concluded that Longview 
Innovations Inc, is acting as an agent on behalf of all investors in the Cayman LP and 
not solely IPG plc, therefore the Group no longer controls IPG Cayman LP. The Group 
therefore ceased to consolidate it from November 2021. 
Arriving at this conclusion required the application of judgement, most significantly 
in assessing the application guidance contained in IFRS 10 B19 which suggests that 
in some instances a special relationship may exist (such as the fact that we remain 
the largest individual investor in the fund), implying that an investor has a more than 
passive interest in the investee. Having considered this guidance we have concluded 
that on balance the Group does not have power over IPG Cayman LP and hence does 
not control it. 
During 2024, the Group advanced $0.9m into IPG Cayman LP via a Simple Agreement 
for Future Equity (“SAFE”). This was in addition to a $10m SAFE investment made in 2023. 
The terms of these SAFEs were such that they did not confer any additional substantive 
rights to the Group in the normal course of business and as a result did not change the 
consolidation conclusion in respect of IPG Cayman LP.
124	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
2. Significant accounting estimates and judgements 
continued 
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

3. Financial risk management
As set out in the principal risks and uncertainties section on pages 40 to 48, the Group 
is exposed, through its normal operations, to a number of financial risks, the most 
significant of which are market, liquidity and credit risks. 
In general, risk management is carried out throughout the Group under policies 
approved by the Board of Directors. The following further describes the Group’s 
objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks and the methods used to 
measure them. Further quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented 
throughout these financial statements.
A) Market risk
(i) Price risk
The Group is exposed to equity securities price risk as a result of the equity and 
debt investments, and investments in Limited Partnerships held by the Group and 
recognised as at fair value through profit or loss.
The Group mitigates this risk by having established investment appraisal processes 
and asset monitoring procedures which are subject to overall review by the Board. 
The Group holds nine investments valued at £140m at 31 December 2024 which are 
publicly traded (2023: ten investments; £203.8m), and the remainder of its investments 
are not traded on an active market.
The net portfolio loss in 2024 of £195.0m represents a 17% decrease against the opening 
balance (2023: loss of 160.5m; 13% decrease). Sensitivity analysis showing the impact 
of movements in quoted equity and debt investments is disclosed in note 13, and 
movements in Limited and Limited Liability interests is shown in note 14.
(ii) Foreign exchange risk
The Group’s main exposure to foreign currency risk is via its investment portfolio, which 
is partially denominated in US dollars, Australian dollars, Euros and Swedish Krona. 
Further details of currency exposure in the portfolio are given in notes 13 and 14.
The Group’s US dollar-denominated proceeds included in deferred consideration at 
December 2024 was £2.5m (2023: £9.4m). 
The Group periodically enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to mitigate 
risk of exchange rate exposure in respect of non GBP-denominated proceeds. As 
at 31 December 2024 there were no contract forward foreign exchange contracts 
outstanding. 
(iii) Interest rate risk
The Group holds a debt facility with the European Investment Bank and a loan note 
facility primarily with Phoenix Group with the overall balance as at 31 December 2024 
amounting to £129.4m (excluding setup costs). These loans all bear a fixed rate of 
interest, with the annual average interest rate being 5.09% (2023: 4.99%).
For further details of the Group’s loans including covenant details see note 19.
The other primary impact of interest rate risk to the Group is the impact on the income 
and operating cash flows as a result of the interest–bearing deposits and cash and 
cash equivalents held by the Group.
(iv) Concentrations of risk
The Group is exposed to concentration risk via the significant majority of the portfolio 
being UK–based companies and thus potentially impacted by the performance of 
the UK economy. In recent years, the Group has decreased the scale of its operations 
in the US as a result of the dilution of its holding in IPG Cayman LP. The group has, 
however, increased the scale of its operations in Australia as a result of additional 
investment in this geography and portfolio value gains.
The Group mitigates Market risk, in co–ordination with liquidity risk, by managing its 
proportion of fixed to floating rate financial assets. The table on page 126 summarises 
the interest rate profile of the Group.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
125
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

2024
2023
Fixed rate
£m
Floating 
rate
£m
Interest 
free
£m
Total
£m
Fixed rate
£m
Floating 
rate
£m
Interest 
free
£m
Total
£m
Financial assets
Equity investments
–
–
713.8
713.8
–
–
1,011.5
1,011.5
Debt investments
–
–
51.6
51.6
–
–
83.7
83.7
Limited and limited liability partnership interests
–
–
58.1
58.1
–
–
69.7
69.7
Assets held for sale
–
–
13.9
13.9
–
–
–
–
Trade receivables
–
–
0.7
0.7
–
–
0.6
0.6
Other receivables
–
–
5.6
5.6
–
–
7.6
7.6
Receivable on sale of debt and equity investments
–
–
20.1
20.1
–
–
9.2
9.2
Deposits
170.0
–
–
170.0
126.0
–
–
126.0
Cash and cash equivalents
10.8
104.4
0.40
115.6
16.8
83.9
0.2
100.9
Total
180.8
104.4
864.2
1,149.4
142.8
83.9
1,182.5
1,409.2
Financial liabilities
Trade payables
–
–
(0.3)
(0.3)
–
–
(0.5)
(0.5)
Other accruals and deferred income
–
–
(12.2)
(12.2)
–
–
(16.5)
(16.5)
Borrowings 
(129.1)
–
–
 (129.1)
(135.2)
–
–
(135.2)
Carried interest plan liability
–
–
(27.3)
(27.3)
–
–
(38.0)
(38.0)
Deferred tax liability
–
–
(4.5)
(4.5)
–
–
(4.8)
(4.8)
Loans from Limited Partners of consolidated funds
–
–
(19.9)
(19.9)
–
–
(19.8)
(19.8)
Other non-current liabilities
–
–
(5.4)
(5.4)
–
–
(6.4)
(6.4)
Total
(129.1)
–
(69.6)
(198.7)
(135.2)
–
(86.0)
(221.2)
126	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
3. Financial risk management continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

At 31 December 2024, if interest rates had been 1% higher/lower, post-tax loss for the 
year, and other components of equity, would have been £1.8m (2023: £2.2m) higher/
lower as a result of higher interest received on cash and deposits.
B) Liquidity risk
The Group seeks to manage liquidity risk, to ensure sufficient liquidity is available to 
meet foreseeable needs and to invest cash assets safely and profitably. The Group’s 
treasury management policy asserts that no more than 60% of the Group’s cash and 
cash equivalents will be placed in fixed-term deposits with a holding period greater 
than three months at any one point in time. Accordingly, the Group only invests 
working capital in short-term instruments issued by a pre-approved list of reputable 
counterparties. The Group continually monitors rolling cash flow forecasts to ensure 
sufficient cash is available for anticipated cash requirements.
C) Credit risk
The Group’s credit risk is primarily attributable to its deposits, cash and cash 
equivalents, debt investments and trade receivables. The Group seeks to mitigate 
its credit risk on cash and cash equivalents by making short-term deposits with 
counterparties, or by investing in treasury funds with an “AAA” credit rating or above 
managed by institutions. Short-term deposit counterparties are required to have 
where applicable, a prime short-term credit rating at the time of investment (ratings 
are generally determined by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s). Moody’s prime credit 
ratings of “P1”, “P2” and “P3” indicate respectively that the rating agency considers the 
counterparty to have a “superior”, “strong” or “acceptable” ability to repay short-term 
debt obligations (generally defined as having an original maturity not exceeding 13 
months). An analysis of the Group’s deposits and cash and cash equivalents balance 
analysed by credit rating as at the reporting date is shown in the table opposite. All 
other financial assets are unrated.
Credit rating
2024
£m
2023
£m
P1
206.9
158.9
AAAMMF1
78.6
66.7
Other2
0.1
1.3
Total deposits and cash and cash equivalents
285.6
226.9
1	
The Group holds £78.6m (2023: £66.7m) with JP Morgan GBP liquidity fund, which has a AAAMMF 
credit rating with Fitch.
2	 The Group holds £0.1m (2023: £1.3m) with Arbuthnot Latham, a private bank with no debt in 
issue and, accordingly, on which a credit rating is not applicable. Bloomberg assess Arbuthnot 
Latham’s 1-year default probability at 0.021279% (2023: 0.020408%).
The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk, with exposure spread over a 
large number of counterparties and customers. The Group has detailed policies and 
strategies which seek to minimise these associated risks including defining maximum 
counterparty exposure limits for term deposits based on their perceived financial 
strength at the commencement of the deposit. The single counterparty limit for fixed 
term deposits in excess of 3 months at 31 December 2024 was the greater of 60% of 
total group cash or £50m (2023: 60%; £50m). In addition, no single institution may hold 
more than the higher of 50% of total cash or £50m. (2023: 50%; £50m).
The group’s exposure to credit risk on debt investments is managed in a similar way 
to equity security price risk, as described above, through the Group’s investment 
appraisal processes and asset monitoring procedures which are subject to overall 
review by the Board. The maximum exposure to credit risk for debt investments, 
receivables and other financial assets is represented by their carrying amount. 
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
127
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
3. Financial risk management continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

4. Revenue from services and other income
Accounting Policy:
Revenue from services and other income is generated primarily from within the 
United Kingdom and is stated exclusive of value added tax, with further revenue 
generated in the Group’s Australian operations. Revenue is recognised when the 
Group satisfies its performance obligations, in line with IFRS 15. Revenue breakdown 
and disclosure requirements under IFRS 15 have not been presented as they are 
considered immaterial. Revenue from services and other income comprises:
Fund management services
Fund management fees include: 
•	
fund management fees which are earned either as a fixed percentage of total 
funds under management or a fixed percentage of capital subscribed, and 
are recognised as the related services are provided and 
•	
performance fees payable from realisations in excess of an agreed return to 
investors which are recognised upon realisation of assets.
Licence and royalty income
The Group’s Intellectual Property licences typically constitute separate 
performance obligations, being separate from other promised goods or services. 
Revenue is recognised in line with the performance obligations included in the 
licence, which can include sales-based, usage-based or milestone-based 
royalties.
Advisory and corporate finance fees
Fees earned from the provision of business support services including executive 
search services and fees for IP Group representation on portfolio company 
boards are recognised as the related services are provided. Corporate finance 
advisory fees are generally earned as a fixed percentage of total funds raised and 
recognised at the time the related transaction is successfully concluded. In some 
instances, these fees are settled via the issue of equity in the company receiving 
the corporate finance services at the same price per share as equity issued as 
part of the financing round to which the advisory fees apply.
Revenue from services is derived from the provision of advisory and venture capital 
fund management services or from licensing activities, royalty revenues and patent 
cost recoveries.
5. Operating segments
For both the year ended 31 December 2024 and the year ended 31 December 2023, 
the Group’s revenue and profit before taxation were derived largely from its principal 
activities within the UK.
For management reporting purposes, the Group is currently organised into five 
operating segments:
i.	
Venture Capital investing within our ‘Healthier future’ thematic area
ii.	
Venture Capital investing within our ‘Tech-enriched future’ thematic area
iii.	 Venture Capital investing within our ‘Regenerative future’ thematic area
iv.	 Venture Capital investing: Other, representing investments not included within our 
three thematic areas above, including platform investments
v.	 the management of third-party funds and the provision of corporate 
finance advice
128	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Reporting line items within Venture Capital investing which are not allocated by thematic sector are presented in the ‘Venture Capital investing: other’ segment. The element of 
our ‘Healthier future’ thematic area relating to Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited is disclosed separately given its size.
These activities are described in further detail in the strategic report on pages 16 to 20.
Year ended 31 December 2024
Statement of comprehensive Income
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Healthier 
future
£m
Of which 
Oxford 
Nanopore 
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Tech-
enriched 
future
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Regenerative 
future
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Other
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Total
£m
Third-party 
fund 
management
£m
Consolidated
£m
Portfolio return and revenue
Change in fair value of equity and debt investments
(126.0)
(65.6)
(45.6)
(75.1)
0.6 
(246.1)
–
(246.1)
(Loss)/gain on disposal of equity and debt investments
7.5 
(0.7)
56.1 
–
0.1 
63.7 
–
63.7 
Change in fair value of limited and limited liability 
partnership interests
(12.6)
(12.6)
–
(12.6)
Revenue from services and other income
0.3
0.3
5.2
5.5
(118.5)
(66.3)
10.5 
(75.1)
(11.6)
(194.7)
5.2 
(189.5)
Administrative expenses1
Carried interest plan credit 1
7.9
7.9
–
7.9
Share-based payment charge1
(1.6)
(1.6)
(0.3)
(1.9)
Other administrative expenses1
(19.8)
(19.8)
(5.5)
(25.3)
(13.5)
(13.5)
(5.8)
(19.3)
Operating loss
(118.5)
(66.3)
10.5
(75.1)
(25.1)
(208.2)
(0.6)
(208.8)
Finance income1
8.1
8.1
0.7
8.8
Finance costs1
(6.7)
(6.7)
–
(6.7)
Loss before taxation
(118.5)
(66.3)
10.5
(75.1)
(23.7)
(206.8)
0.1
(206.7)
Taxation1
(0.3)
(0.3)
–
(0.3)
Loss for the year
(118.5)
(66.3)
10.5
(75.1)
(24.0)
(207.1)
0.1
(207.0)
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
Assets
463.1 
106.6 
101.1 
215.9 
352.0 
1,132.1 
19.1 
1,151.2 
Liabilities1
(191.8)
(191.8)
(6.9)
(198.7)
Net Assets
463.1 
106.6 
101.1 
215.9 
160.2
940.3
12.2
952.5
Other segment items
Portfolio investment
(36.3)
(1.0)
(8.5)
(15.7)
(2.5)
(63.0)
–
(63.0)
Cash proceeds
30.4
1.6
148.9
–
4.1
183.4
–
183.4
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
129
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
5. Operating segments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Year ended 31 December 2023
Statement of Comprehensive Income
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Healthier 
future
£m
Of which 
Oxford 
Nanopore 
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Tech-
enriched 
future
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Regenerative 
future
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Other
£m
Venture 
capital 
investing: 
Total
£m
Third-
party fund 
management
£m
Consolidated
£m
Portfolio return and revenue
Change in fair value of equity and debt investments
(92.9)
(31.9)
(7.0)
(8.7)
(2.3)
(110.9)
–
(110.9)
(Loss)/gain on disposal of equity and debt investments
(12.9)
–
2.1
–
–
(10.8)
–
(10.8)
Change in fair value of limited and limited liability 
partnership interests
(38.8)
(38.8)
–
(38.8)
Revenue from services and other income
1.3
1.3
4.6
5.9
(105.8)
(31.9)
(4.9)
(8.7)
(39.8)
(159.2)
4.6
(154.6)
Administrative expenses1
Carried interest plan credit1
4.7
4.7
–
4.7
Share-based payment charge1
(2.3)
(2.3)
(0.3)
 (2.6)
Other administrative expenses1
(22.6)
(22.6)
(5.4)
(28.0)
(20.2)
(20.2)
(5.7)
(25.9)
Operating loss
(105.8)
(31.9)
(4.9)
(8.7)
(60.0)
(179.4)
(1.1)
(180.5)
Finance income1
9.4
9.4
0.4
9.8
Finance costs1
(5.6)
(5.6)
–
(5.6)
Loss before taxation
(105.8)
(31.9)
(4.9)
(8.7)
(56.2)
(175.6)
(0.7)
(176.3)
Taxation1
1.9
1.9
–
1.9
Loss for the year
(105.8)
(31.9)
(4.9)
(8.7)
(54.3)
(173.7)
(0.7)
(174.4)
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
Assets
576.5
173.6
231.4
275.3
310.2
1,393.4
18.2
1,411.6
Liabilities1
(214.7)
(214.7)
(6.6)
(221.3)
Net Assets
576.5
173.6
231.4
275.3
95.5
1,178.7
11.6
1,190.3
Other segment items
Portfolio investment
(33.9)
–
(11.9)
(17.6)
(9.8)
(73.2)
–
(73.2)
Cash proceeds
3.7
–
33.2
0.1
1.6
38.6
–
38.6
1	
These amounts cannot be apportioned to the individual segments of the venture capital investing business.
130	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
5. Operating segments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

6. Auditor’s remuneration
Details of the auditor’s remuneration are set out below:
2024
£000
2023
£000
Audit of these financial statements (KPMG LLP)
635.9
525.3
Audit of financial statements of funds and  
subsidiaries of the companies (KPMG LLP)
153.5
139.2
Audit related assurance services (KPMG LLP)
74.3
72.3
Total assurance services
863.7
736.8
7. Operating loss
Operating loss has been arrived at after charging:
2024
£m
2023
£m
Depreciation of right-of-use asset, property,  
plant and equipment
(0.6)
(0.6)
Total employee costs (see note 9)
(19.0)
(19.0)
8. Other administrative expenses
Other administrative expenses comprise:
2024
£m
2023
£m
Employee costs (less share-based payment charge) 
14.7
16.4
Professional services
3.2
4.2
Depreciation of tangible assets
0.6
0.6
Other expenses
4.1
6.8
22.6
28.0
Restructuring costs – labour
2.4
–
Restructuring costs – professional services
0.3
–
Total
25.3
28.0
9. Employee costs
Accounting Policy:
Employee benefits
Pension obligations
The Group operates a company defined contribution pension scheme for which 
all employees are eligible. The assets of the scheme are held separately from 
those of the Group in independently administered funds. The Group currently 
makes contributions on behalf of employees to this scheme or to employee 
personal pension schemes on an individual basis. The Group has no further 
payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are 
recognised as employee benefit expenses when they are due.
Share–based payments
The Group engages in equity-settled share-based payment transactions in 
respect of services receivable from employees, by granting employees conditional 
awards of ordinary shares subject to certain vesting conditions. Conditional 
awards of shares are made pursuant to the Group’s Long-Term Incentive Plan 
(“LTIP”) awards and/or the Group’s Annual Incentive Scheme (“AIS”). The fair value 
of the shares is estimated at the date of grant, taking into account the terms and 
conditions of the award, including market-based performance conditions.
The fair value at the date of grant is recognised as an expense over the period 
that the employee provides services, generally the period between the start of the 
performance period and the vesting date of the shares. The corresponding credit 
is recognised in retained earnings within total equity. The fair value of services 
is calculated using the market value on the date of award and is adjusted for 
expected and actual levels of vesting. Where conditional awards of shares lapse, 
the expense recognised to date is credited to the statement of comprehensive 
income in the year in which they lapse. Where the terms for an equity-settled 
award are modified, and the modification increases the total fair value of the 
share-based payment or is otherwise beneficial to the employee at the date of 
modification, the incremental fair value is amortised over the vesting period.
See the audited section of the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 78 to 100 
and note 21 for further details.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
131
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Employee costs (including Executive Directors) comprise: 
2024
£m
2023
£m
Salaries
10.6
11.3
Defined contribution pension cost
1.1
1.1
Other bonuses accrued in the year
1.8
2.6
Social security
1.2
1.4
Restructuring costs – labour
2.4
–
Employee costs
17.1
16.4
Share–based payment charge (see note 21)
1.9
2.6
Total employee costs
19.0
19.0
The average monthly number of persons (including Executive Directors) employed 
by the Group during the year was 98, all of whom were involved in management and 
administration activities (2023: 101). General details of the Directors’ remuneration 
can be found in the audited sections of the Directors’ Remuneration Report on 
pages 78 to 100.
10. Taxation
Accounting Policy:
Deferred tax
Full provision is made for deferred tax on all temporary differences resulting 
from the carrying value of an asset or liability and its tax base. Deferred tax is 
determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively 
enacted by the reporting date and are expected to apply when the related 
deferred tax asset is realised or deferred tax liability settled. Deferred tax assets 
are recognised to the extent that it is probable that the deferred tax asset will be 
recovered in the future.
2024
£m
2023
£m
Current tax
UK corporation tax on profits for the year
–
–
Foreign tax
–
–
–
–
Deferred tax charge/(credit) 
0.3
(1.9)
Total tax
0.3
(1.9)
The Group primarily seeks to generate capital gains from its holdings in spin-out 
companies over the longer term. The majority of these capital gains qualify for UK 
Substantial Shareholding Exemption (“SSE”) and are therefore not taxable, resulting 
in the Group making annual net operating losses from its operations from a UK tax 
perspective. 
Gains arising on sales of holdings which do not qualify for SSE will ordinarily give rise 
to taxable profits for the Group, to the extent that these exceed the Group’s ability to 
offset gains against current and brought forward tax losses (subject to the relevant 
restrictions on the use of brought–forward losses). In such cases, a deferred tax liability 
is recognised in respect of estimated tax amount payable.
The amount for the year can be reconciled to the loss per the statement of 
comprehensive income as follows:
2024
£m
2023
£m
Loss before tax
(206.7)
(176.3)
Tax at the UK corporation tax rate of 25% (2023: 23.52%)
(51.7)
(41.5)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
(1.8)
(1.1)
Income not taxable
(15.9)
2.5
Fair value movement on investments qualifying for SSE
65.8
40.9
Movement on share–based payments
0.3
0.6
Movement in tax losses arising not recognised
3.6
0.1
CIR (Corporate Interest Rate) reactivation
–
(3.1)
Foreign tax
–
0.1
Rate change on deferred tax
–
(0.4)
Total tax charge/(credit)
0.3
(1.9)
132	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
9. Employee costs continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

At 31 December 2024, deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses, for 
which no deferred tax asset has been recognised, totalled £333.0m (2023: £298.3m).  
An analysis is shown below:
2024
2023
Amount
£m
Deferred 
tax
£m
Amount
£m
Deferred 
tax
£m
Share–based payment 
costs and other temporary 
differences
(52.4)
(13.1)
(48.1)
(12.0)
Unused tax losses
(279.6)
(69.9)
(250.2)
(62.6)
Total unrecognised  
deferred tax asset
(333.0)
(83.0)
(298.3)
(74.6)
At 31 December 2024, deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses, for 
which a deferred tax liability has been recognised, totalled £18.0m (2023: £18.9m). An 
analysis is shown below:
2024
2023
Amount
£m
Deferred 
tax
£m
Amount
£m
Deferred 
tax
£m
Temporary timing differences
39.6
9.9
54.1
13.5
Unused tax losses
(21.6)
(5.4)
(35.2)
(8.7)
Total recognised  
deferred tax liability
18.0
4.5
18.9
4.8
11. Earnings per share
Earnings
2024
£m
2023
£m
Earnings for the purposes of basic and dilutive earnings 
per share
(202.6)
(171.3)
Number of shares
2024
Number of 
shares
2023
Number of 
shares
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the 
purposes of basic earnings per share
1,014,672,586
1,036,400,406
Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares:  
Options or contingently issuable shares 
–
–
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the 
purposes of diluted earnings per share
1,014,672,586
1,036,400,406
2024
pence
2023
pence
Basic 
(19.97)
(16.53)
Diluted
(19.97)
(16.53)
No adjustment has been made to the basic loss per share in the years ended 
31 December 2024 and 31 December 2023, as the exercise of share options would have 
the effect of reducing the loss per ordinary share and therefore is not dilutive.
Potentially dilutive ordinary shares include contingently issuable shares arising under 
the Group’s LTIP arrangements, and options issued as part of the Group’s Sharesave 
schemes and Deferred Bonus Share Plan (for annual bonuses deferred under the 
terms of the Group’s Annual Incentive Scheme).
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
133
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
10. Taxation continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

12. Categorisation of financial instruments
Accounting policy:
Financial assets and liabilities 
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised in the balance sheet when the relevant Group entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. De–
recognition occurs when rights to cash flows from a financial asset expire, or when a liability is extinguished.
Derivative financial instruments are accounted for at fair value through profit and loss in accordance with IFRS 9. They are revalued at the balance sheet date based on market 
prices, with any change in fair value being recorded in profit and loss. Derivatives are recognised in the Consolidated statement of financial position as a financial asset when 
their fair value is positive and as a financial liability whey their fair value is negative. The Group’s derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedging instruments.
Financial assets
In respect of regular way purchases or sales, the Group uses trade date accounting to recognise or derecognise financial assets.
The Group classifies its financial assets into one of the categories listed below, depending on the purpose for which the asset was acquired.
At fair value through profit or loss
Held for trading and financial assets are recognised at fair value through profit and loss. This category includes equity investments, debt investments and investments in 
limited partnerships. Investments in associated undertakings, which are held by the Group with a view to the ultimate realisation of capital gains, are also categorised as 
at fair value through profit or loss. This measurement basis is consistent with the fact that the Group’s performance in respect of investments in equity investments, limited 
partnerships and associated undertakings is evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with an established investment strategy. 
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value and any gains or losses arising from subsequent changes in fair value are presented in 
profit or loss in the statement of comprehensive income in the period which they arise.
At amortised cost
These assets are non–derivative financial assets with fixed and determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise principally through the provision 
of services to customers (trade receivables) and are carried at cost less provision for impairment.
Deposits
Deposits comprise longer–term deposits held with financial institutions with an original maturity of greater than three months and, in line with IAS 7 are not included within 
cash and cash equivalents. Cash flows related to investments in, and maturities of amounts held on deposit are presented within investing activities in the consolidated 
statement of cash flows. Interest income related to deposits is included within cashflows from operating activities.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and short-term deposits held with financial institutions with an original maturity of three months or less. Interest income 
related to cash is included within cashflows from operating activities.
Financial liabilities
Current financial liabilities are composed of trade payables and other short–term monetary liabilities, which are recognised at amortised cost.
Non–current liabilities are composed of loans from Limited Partners of consolidated funds, outstanding amounts drawn down from a debt facility provided by the European 
Investment Bank, loan notes provided by Phoenix Group, carried interest plans liabilities, and other liabilities.
Unless otherwise indicated, the carrying amounts of the Group’s financial liabilities are a reasonable approximation to their fair value. Non–current liabilities are recognised 
initially at fair value net of transaction costs incurred, and subsequently at amortised cost.
134	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Financial assets
At fair 
value 
through 
profit or 
loss
£m
Amortised 
cost
£m
Total
£m
Equity investments
713.8
–
713.8
Debt investments
51.6
–
51.6
Limited and limited liability partnership interests 
58.1
–
58.1
Assets held for sale
13.9
–
13.9
Trade and other receivables
–
6.3
6.3
Receivables on sale of debt and equity investments
20.1
–
20.1
Deposits
–
170.0
170.0
Cash and cash equivalents
–
115.6
115.6
At 31 December 2024
857.5
291.9
1,149.40
Equity investments
1,011.5
–
1,011.5
Debt investments
83.7
–
83.7
Limited and limited liability partnership interests 
69.7
–
69.7
Trade and other receivables
–
8.2
8.2
Receivables on sale of debt and equity investments
9.2
–
9.2
Deposits
–
126.0
126.0
Cash and cash equivalents
–
100.9
100.9
At 31 December 2023
1,174.1
235.1
1,409.2
In light of the credit ratings applicable to the Group’s cash and cash equivalent and deposits, (see note 3 for further details), we estimate expected credit losses on the Group’s 
receivables to be under £0.1m and therefore not disclosed further (2023: less than £0.1m), similarly we have not presented an analysis of credit ratings of trade and other 
receivable and receivables on sale of debt and equity investments.
All net fair value gains in the year are attributable to financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition (2023: all net fair value gains in the year 
are attributable to financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition).
Interest income of £nil (2023: £nil) is attributable to financial assets classified as fair value through profit and loss.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
135
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Categorisation of financial instruments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments and Assets Held for Sale
Accounting policy:
Fair value hierarchy
The Group classifies financial assets using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the related fair value measurements. The 
level in the fair value hierarchy, within which a financial asset is classified, is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to that asset’s fair value 
measurement. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, such as prices from market transactions. 
Level 3 – One or more inputs that are not based on observable market data.
Equity investments
Fair value is the underlying principle and is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the 
measurement date” (IPEV guidelines, December 2022). 
Where the equity structure of a portfolio company involves different class rights in a sale or liquidity event, the Group takes these different rights into account when forming 
a view on the value of its investment.
Valuation techniques used
The fair value of unlisted securities is established using appropriate valuation techniques in line with December 2022 IPEV guidelines. The selection of appropriate valuation 
techniques is considered on an individual basis in light of the nature, facts and circumstances of the investment and in the expected view of market participants. The Group 
selects valuation techniques which make maximum use of market–based inputs. Techniques are applied consistently from period to period, except where a change would 
result in better estimates of fair value. Several valuation techniques may be used so that the results of one technique may be used as a cross check/corroboration of an 
alternative technique.
Valuation techniques used include:
•	
Quoted bid price: The fair values of quoted investments are based on bid prices in an active market at the reporting date.
•	
Funding transaction: The fair value of unquoted investments which have recently raised equity financing may be calculated with reference to the price of the recent 
investment. For investments for which the capital structure involves different class rights in a sale or liquidity event, a full scenario analysis via the use of the probability–
weighted expected return method (“PWERM”) is used to calculate the implied values of the existing share classes.
•	
Other: Future market/commercial events: Scenario analysis is used, which is a forward–looking method that considers one or more possible future scenarios. These 
methods include simplified scenario analysis and relative value scenario analysis, which tie to the fully diluted (“post–money”) equity value. The PWERM method may be 
utilised for this valuation technique for investments which have an equity structure which involves different class rights in a sale or liquidity event.
•	
Other: Adjusted funding transaction price based on past performance – upwards/downwards: The milestone approach involves making an assessment as to whether 
there is an indication of change in fair value based on a consideration of the relevant milestones, typically agreed at the time of making the investment decision.
•	
Other: Discounted cash flows: deriving the value of a business by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows.
•	
Other: Revenue multiple: the application of an appropriate multiple to a performance measure (such as earnings or revenue) of the investee company in order to derive 
a value for the business.
The fair value indicated by a recent transaction is used to calibrate inputs used with valuation techniques including those noted above. At each measurement date, an 
assessment is made as to whether changes or events subsequent to the relevant transaction would imply a change in the investment’s fair value. The price of a recent 
investment is not considered a standalone valuation technique (see further considerations below). Where the current fair value of an investment is unchanged from the price of 
a funding transaction, the Group refers to the valuation basis as ‘Funding transaction’.
136	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Price of recent investment as an input in assessing fair value
The Group considers that fair value estimates which are based primarily on observable market data will be of greater reliability than those based on assumptions. Given 
the nature of the Group’s investments in seed, start–up and early–stage companies, where there are often no current and no short–term future earnings or positive cash 
flows, it can be difficult to gauge the probability and financial impact of the success or failure of development or research activities and to make reliable cash flow forecasts. 
Consequently, in many cases the most appropriate approach to fair value is a valuation technique which is based on market data such as the price of a recent investment, 
and market participant assumptions as to potential outcomes.
Calibrating such scenarios or milestones may result in a fair value equal to price of recent investment for a limited period of time. Often qualitative milestones provide a 
directional indication of the movement of fair value. 
In applying a calibrated scenario or milestone-approach to determine fair value, consideration is given to performance against milestones that were set at the time of 
the original investment decision, as well as taking into consideration the key market drivers of the investee company and the overall economic environment. Factors that 
the Group considers include, inter alia, technical measures such as product development phases and patent approvals, financial measures such as cash burn rate and 
profitability expectations, and market and sales measures such as testing phases, product launches and market introduction. 
Where the Group considers that there is an indication that the fair value has changed, an estimation is made of the required amount of any adjustment from the last price of 
recent investment. 
Where a deterioration in value has occurred, the Group reduces the carrying value of the investment to reflect the estimated decrease. If there is evidence of value creation 
the Group may consider increasing the carrying value of the investment; however, in the absence of additional financing rounds or profit generation it can be difficult to 
determine the value that a market participant may place on positive developments given the potential outcome and the costs and risks to achieving that outcome and 
accordingly caution is applied.
Debt investments
Debt investments are generally unquoted debt instruments which are convertible to equity at a future point in time. Such instruments are considered to be hybrid 
instruments containing a fixed rate debt host contract with an embedded equity derivative. The Group designates the entire hybrid contract at fair value through profit or 
loss on initial recognition and, accordingly, the embedded derivative is not separated from the host contract and accounted for separately. The price at which the debt 
investment was made may be a reliable indicator of fair value at that date depending on facts and circumstances. Any subsequent remeasurement will be recognised as 
changes in fair value in the statement of comprehensive income.
Disclosure of unrealised and realised gains and losses
‘Change in fair value of equity and debt investments’ per the Group Income Statement represents unrealised revaluation gains and losses on the Group’s portfolio of 
investment. 
Gains on disposal of equity investments represents the difference between the fair value of consideration received and the carrying value at the start of the accounting 
period for the investment in question.
Changes in fair values of investments do not constitute revenue.
Assets held for sale
During 2024, an element of the Group’s investments in Artios Pharma Limited, Nexeon Limited and Mission Therapeutics Limited were included in a secondary sale of shares 
which was agreed within the year but which had not completed at year end. In addition, the Group had commenced selling a pre-specified proportion of its shares in 
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc prior to year end, with the share disposal completing in early 2025. Accordingly these investments met the classification criteria as assets held 
for sale and were hence reclassified from Equity Investments to assets held for sale. 
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
137
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Equity and Debt Investments within the Top 10 by holding value 
The following table lists information on the debt and equity investments within the most valuable 10 portfolio company investments, representing 58% of the total portfolio value 
(2023: 61%). Detail on the performance of these companies is included in the portfolio review section of the Strategic Report.
The Group engages third-party valuation specialists to provide valuation support where required; during the period we commissioned third-party valuations on four out of the 
top 10 holdings (2023: 6).
Company name
Primary valuation basis
Fair value 
of Group 
holding at 
31 Dec 2024
£m
Fair value 
of Group 
holding at 
31 Dec 2023
£m
Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc
Quoted bid price
 106.6 
 173.6 
Istesso Limited *
DCF
 91.9 
 113.8 
Hysata Pty Ltd
Funding transaction < 12 months, PWERM
 76.8 
 70.0 
Oxa Autonomy Limited *
Adjusted funding – downwards
 42.7 
 65.7 
Hinge Health, Inc.*
Adjusted funding – downwards
 36.6 
 34.0 
First Light Fusion Limited *
Future event
 25.0 
 64.9 
Pulmocide Limited
Adjusted funding – upwards
 23.1 
 19.2 
Mission Therapeutics Limited
Funding transaction < 12 months, PWERM
 22.5 
 15.8 
Nexeon Limited
Future event
 19.4 
 11.8 
Artios Pharma Limited
Adjusted funding – downwards
 17.4 
 17.4 
Total
462.0
586.2
* Third-party valuation specialists used for 31 December 2024 valuation. In these instances, the valuation basis is management’s assessment of the primary valuation input used by the third-party 
valuation specialist.
138	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Level 1
Level 3
Equity 
investments 
in quoted 
spin–out 
companies
£m
Unquoted 
equity 
investments 
in spin–out 
companies
£m
Debt 
investments 
in unquoted 
spin–out 
companies
£m
Total 
£m
At 1 January 2023
228.7
892.1
38.1
1,158.9
Investments
– 
32.8 
30.6 
63.4
Transaction–based reclassifications
–
7.8 
(7.8)
–
Other transfers between hierarchy levels
1.8 
(1.8)
–
–
Disposals
(1.6)
(7.6)
(0.3)
(9.5)
Fees settled via equity
–
0.1 
–
0.1
Other change in portfolio value
–
(6.8)
–
(6.8)
Change in fair value1
(24.5)
(103.7)
23.5 
(104.7)
Change in FX1
(0.6)
(5.2)
(0.4)
(6.2)
At 1 January 2024
203.8
807.7
83.7
1,095.2
Investments
1.5
40.9
18.4
60.8
Transaction–based reclassifications
0.3
49.5
(49.8)
–
Other transfers between hierarchy levels
–
–
–
–
Disposals
(11.8)
(116.6)
(1.0)
(129.4)
Reclassification to Assets Held for Sale
(7.1)
(6.8)
–
(13.9)
Other change in portfolio value 
–
(1.1)
(0.1)
(1.2)
Change in fair value1
(53.7)
(187.4)
1.7
(239.4)
Change in FX1
0.1
(5.5)
(1.3)
(6.7)
At 31 December 2024
133.1
580.7
51.6
765.4
1	
The total unrealised change in fair value and FX in respect of Level 3 investments was a loss of £192.5m (2023: loss of £85.8m).
Unquoted equity and debt investment are measured in accordance with IPEV guidelines with reference to the most appropriate information available at the time of 
measurement. Where relevant, several valuation approaches are used in arriving at an estimate of fair value for an individual asset. 
For assets and liabilities that are recognised at fair value on a recurring basis, the Group determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-
assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. Transfers between 
levels are then made as if the transfer took place on the first day of the period in question, except in the cases of transfers between tiers based on an initial public offering (“IPO”) 
of an investment wherein the changes in value prior to the IPO are calculated and reported in level 3, and those changes post are attributed to level 1.
Transfers between level 3 and level 1 occur when a previously unquoted investment undertakes an initial public offering, resulting in its equity becoming quoted on an active 
market. In the current period, transfers of this nature amounted to £nil (2023: £1.8m). Transfers between level 1 and level 3 would occur when a quoted investment’s market 
becomes inactive, or the portfolio company elects to delist. There have been no instances in the current year, totalling £nil (2023: one instance, totalling £nil). 
Transfers between level 3 debt and level 3 equity occur upon conversion of convertible debt into equity. In the current year, transfers of this nature amounted to £49.8m (2023: £7.8m). 
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
139
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

In the year, a transfer between level 3 debt and level 1 equity of £0.3m (2023: nil) occurred when a convertible loan issued to a listed company (Abliva AB) was converted into 
listed equity. 
The Group has considered the impact of ESG and climate change issues on its portfolio, including performing a materiality assessment (see summary TCFD disclosures on 
page 32) which suggested the Group’s portfolio has a relatively low level of climate change risk, and clear areas of opportunity via the Group’s Cleantech investments. For an 
overview of the portfolio split by sector, please refer to the Managing Partner’s Portfolio Review on page 17. We believe the Group’s current valuation approach, reflects market 
participant assessment of the ESG and climate risks and opportunities of our portfolio.
Valuation inputs and sensitivities
Unobservable inputs are typically portfolio company-specific and, based on a materiality assessment, are not considered significant either at an individual company level or in 
aggregate where relevant for common factors such as discount rates.
The sensitivity analysis table below has been prepared in recognition of the fact that some of the valuation methodologies applied by the Group in valuing the portfolio 
investments involve subjectivity in their significant unobservable inputs. Furthermore, given that many of the Group’s portfolio are the early stage or growth stage of development, 
their valuations can be significantly impacted by factors including, but not limited to, the availability of financing, technical and commercial setbacks, market developments and 
regulatory approvals. 
The table illustrates the possible impact on valuation of different sensitivities. The varying levels of sensitivity applied in the table below are intended to reflect the relative level of 
judgment in applying the valuation approach. Additional analysis for Istesso Limited and Hinge Health, Inc is provided after the table below, which merit specific focus in light of 
the specific facts and circumstances of these investments.
Valuation technique
Fair value of 
investments
 Variable inputs
Variable 
input 
sensitivity
Positive impact
Negative impact
Fair value of 
investments
2024
£m
%
£m
% of NAV
£m
% of NAV
2023
£m
Quoted
133.1
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
 n/a
203.8
Funding transaction 
<12 months
217.8
•	
Inputs used in PWERM models to quantify the 
impact of funding transactions on subordinate 
securities including exit values and timelines.
+/–5
10.9
1.1
(10.9)
(1.1)
187.9
Funding transaction 
>12 months
54.9
+/–5
2.7
0.3
(2.7)
(0.3)
162.7
Other: Future market/
commercial events
60.7
•	
Estimated impact of future event
•	
Execution risk discount applied to future event 
(where positive)
•	
Scenario probabilities
•	
Discount rates
•	
Extent to which future event is indicative of facts 
and circumstances in existence at the balance 
sheet date
+/–10
6.1
0.6
(6.1)
(0.6)
25.0
Other: Adjusted 
financing price based 
on past performance – 
Upwards*
35.9
•	
Company-specific milestone analysis resulting 
in a positive calibration adjustment versus the 
previous funding transaction price
+/–10
3.6
0.4
(3.6)
(0.4)
99.9
140	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Valuation technique
Fair value of 
investments
 Variable inputs
Variable 
input 
sensitivity
Positive impact
Negative impact
Fair value of 
investments
2024
£m
%
£m
% of NAV
£m
% of NAV
2023
£m
Other: Adjusted 
financing price based 
on past performance – 
Downwards*
152.7
•	
Company-specific milestone analysis resulting 
in a negative calibration adjustment versus the 
previous funding transaction price
+/–10
15.3
1.6
(15.3)
(1.6)
203.9
Other: Revenue 
multiple*
13.1
•	
Estimate of future recurring revenues
•	
Selection of comparable companies
•	
Discount/premium to multiple
+/–10
1.3
0.1
(1.3)
(0.1)
85.4
Other: DCF*
97.2
•	
Discount rate
•	
Clinical trial and drug approval success rates
•	
Estimate of likelihood, value and structure of a 
potential pharmaceutical partnership
•	
Estimate of addressable market
•	
Market share and royalty rates
•	
Probability estimation of liquidity event
•	
Estimate of forward exchange rates
+/–20
19.4
2.0
(19.4)
(2.0)
126.6
Total
765.4
59.3
6.1
(59.3)
(6.1)
1,095.2
* Due to the large number of inputs used in the valuation of these assets, unobservable inputs are below a size threshold that would warrant disclosure under IFRS 13, paragraph 93(d). Due to the large 
number of inputs, any range of reasonably possible alternative assumptions does not significantly impact the fair value and hence no valuation sensitivity is required under IFRS 13 paragraph 93(h)(ii).
Within the ‘Other: DCF’ category is Istesso Limited, in which we value the equity of IP Group’s holding at £55.0m at 31 December 2024 (2023: £86.7m). 
The Group was notified of the outcome of Istesso’s Phase 2b trial for Leramistat in February 2025, reflecting information which Istesso Limited had received prior to 
31 December 2024. As a result, the outcome of the trial was judged by management to be an adjusting post balance sheet event, reflecting facts and circumstances which were 
knowable at 31 December 2024. 
The valuation of the equity in this company is based on a DCF model which assesses the value of the future cash flows arising from the continued development of the company’s 
lead asset Leramistat via an additional focussed Phase 2b trial, followed by a pharmaceutical partnership, after which the drug would be taken into a Phase 3 trial followed by 
regulatory approval. This DCF model has been updated to reflect the outcome of Istesso’s Phase 2b trial, with the main impact being a delay in market launch of the drug by 3½ 
years. The inputs in the DCF model include: 
•	
the drug development timeline, based on the current development pathway which would see the drug being approved in mid-2031 if successful
•	
probability of Ph2b and Ph3 clinical trial success, based on comparable clinical trial success rates within autoimmune indications in Ph2 and Ph2 trials, with an estimate of the 
overall Ph2 rate split between Ph2a (now complete) and Ph2b 
•	
the selection of relevant comparable deal sizes, based on comparable publicly announced deals within the autoimmune space
•	
the probability of securing a pharmaceutical partner post Ph2b
•	
Leramistat’s sales profile based on a bottom up model which estimates the number of patients failing 1st line biological drug treatment, with the assumption that Leramistat 
would address this available patient population
•	
royalty rates receivable by Istesso of drug sales, based on comparable publicly announced deals within the autoimmune space
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
141
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

•	
discount rate, based on the WACC of a large pharma partner which would take on 
development of the drug for Phase 3 and onwards
•	
The remaining costs to develop Leramistat up until the point of drug partnership
The valuation is sensitive to the inputs noted above. It is in the Group’s view that the 
valuation would be impacted by a combination of changes to these inputs but to 
provide context to the sensitivity of each input to the valuation as required IAS 1, the 
table below sets out the impact on valuation of changing critical inputs in isolation. 
Input
Assumption 
used
Sensitivity
Impact on 
IPG equity 
holding 
£m
Impact % 
of NAV1
Phase 2b success rate
63%
+/– 10%
£12m
+/– 1.2%
Selected pharma partner 
deal size
Bottom 
quartile
Median
£60m
+6.2%
Pharma partnership probability
90%
+/– 10%
£7m
+/– 0.7%
Royalty rate
15%
+/– 5%
£14m
+/– 1.4%
1	
Being impact on IPG equity holding as a proportion of the Group’s Net Asset Value
Under the DCF methodology, in the event that the drug fails to progress to the market 
as a result of trial failures (at either Phase 2b or Phase 3), failure to receive regulatory 
approval or failure to partner with a pharmaceutical partner, the model assumes a 
zero value outcome.
The modelling approach focuses on a core drug development scenario as outlined 
above, however other outcomes such as the requirement to conduct more than one 
additional Phase 2b study are possible. In this outcome, the value of the programme 
would be materially lower than the concluded fair value estimate.
A valuation range was not calculated in respect of the Group’s debt investment in 
Istesso Limited, which totals £36.9m (2023: £27.0m). In the event of a negative outcome 
in terms of the drug development pathway, this would be anticipated to have a 
material negative impact on the value of the Group’s debt investment.
Within the ‘Other: Adjusted financing price based on past performance – Downwards’ 
category is Hinge Health, Inc, whose equity value is £36.6m at 31 December 2024 
(2023: £34.0m). The valuation of this company is based on the last financing round 
price, with a downwards calibration adjustment applied. Our estimated range for the 
value of the Group’s equity investment in Hinge Health, Inc. as at 31 December 2024 is 
£30m to £38m (2023: £36m to £50m). In March 2025, the company filed a registration 
statement with the US SEC for an intended NYSE IPO; as at the publication date of the 
accounts the outcome and pricing range of the IPO is uncertain, but could result in a 
material post year end movement in the Group’s valuation.
Change in fair value in the year (including fx)
2024
£m
2023
£m
Fair value gains
42.7
97.4
Fair value losses
(288.8)
(208.3)
Total
(246.1)
(110.9)
The Company’s interests in subsidiary undertakings are listed in note 11 to the 
Company’s financial statements.
Currency risk
Exposure to currency risk through asset allocation, which is calculated by reference 
to the currency in which the asset is quoted, is shown below. A +/-1% sensitivity has 
been included to demonstrate the effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. 1% is 
considered to be appropriate due to the stable currencies in which we hold cash.
At 31 December 2024
Investments 
£m
Sensitivity 
+/- 1% £m
US dollar
96.8
1.0
Australian dollar
94.0
0.9
Euro
12.9
0.1
Swedish Krona
5.7
0.1
Total
209.4
2.1
At 31 December 2023
Investments 
£m
Sensitivity 
+/- 1% £m
US dollar
85.5
0.8
Australian dollar
99.9
1.0
Euro
6.7
0.1
Swedish Krona
1.6
–
Total
193.7
1.9
142	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13. Portfolio: Equity and debt investments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

14. Portfolio: Limited and limited liability  
partnership interests
Accounting Policy: 
Valuations in respect of Limited and Limited Liability Funds are based on IP Group’s 
share of the Net Asset Value of the fund as per the audited financial statements 
prepared by the fund manager. The key judgments in the preparation of these 
accounts relate to the valuation of unquoted investments. Management conduct 
an analysis of the appropriateness of valuations of specific equity and debt 
investments in portfolio companies held within the fund in question. In making 
these assessments, the Group has applied a valuation methodology consistent 
with that set out in note 13. Where a significant divergence from the Group’s 
valuation methodology is identified, an adjustment is made to the fund manager 
NAV statement to bring the value of the fund investment in line with the Group’s 
accounting policy in respect of debt and equity investments.
Investments in these Limited and Limited Liability Partnerships are recognised at 
fair value through profit and loss in accordance with IFRS 9.
‘Changes in fair value of Limited Partnership investments’ per the Group Income 
Statement represents revaluation gains and losses on the Group’s investment in 
Limited Partnership funds. 
Fund interests are valued on a net asset basis, estimated based on the managers’ 
NAVs. Manager’s NAVs apply valuation techniques consistent with IFRS and are subject 
to audit. Where audited accounts are received in arrears of the publication of the 
Group’s results hence these are marked as unaudited in the table below, however a 
retrospective review of audited accounts versus earlier unaudited results is carried out. 
Managers’ NAVs are usually published quarterly, two to four months after the quarter 
end. The below table analyses the fund valuations with reference to manager NAV 
dates used at 31 December.
Limited & Limited Liability 
Partnerships 
Functional 
currency
Status
2024
 £m
2023
 £m
IPG Cayman Fund L.P. 
(Longview Innovation)
USD
Unaudited 
37.7
46.0
UCL Technology Fund L.P.
GBP
Unaudited
18.0
20.7
Technikos LLP
GBP
Unaudited 
2.4
3.0
Total
58.1
69.7
We reviewed the underlying valuation methodologies adopted by our Fund 
managers for all Fund investments of material value. Following our review of valuation 
methodologies we were satisfied that the techniques utilised were appropriate. 
Limited & Limited Liability Partnerships movements in year
£m
At 1 January 2023
99.6
Investments during the year
9.8
Distribution from Limited Partnership funds
(0.9)
Change in fair value during the year
(36.5)
Currency revaluation
(2.3)
At 1 January 2024
69.7
Investments during the year
2.2
Distribution from Limited Partnership funds
(1.2)
Change in fair value during the year
(13.1)
Currency revaluation
0.5
At 31 December 2024
58.1
The Group considers interests in limited and limited liability partnerships to be level 3 in 
the fair value hierarchy throughout the current and previous financial years. 
The valuation of the Group’s interests in limited and limited liability partnerships is a 
significant accounting estimate, as management has applied judgment in considering 
whether to adjust the NAV estimates provided by the fund manager. This assessment 
was based on an analysis of the appropriateness of valuations of specific equity and 
debt investments in portfolio companies held within the fund in question. In making 
these assessments, the Group has applied a valuation methodology consistent with 
that set out in note 13. Unobservable inputs are portfolio company-specific and, based 
on a materiality assessment, are not considered individually significant either at an 
individual company level or in aggregate where relevant for common factors such as 
discount rates.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
143
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

15. Gain/(loss) on disposal of equity and debt investments
2024
£m
2023
£m
Proceeds from sale of equity and debt investments
182.2
37.7
Movement in amounts receivable on sale of debt and 
equity investments 
10.9
(39.0)
Carrying value of investments
(129.4)
(9.5)
Gain/(loss) on disposal
63.7
(10.8)
Gain/(loss) on disposal of investments is calculated as disposal proceeds plus 
deferred and contingent consideration receivable in respect of the sale, less the 
carrying value of the investment at the point of disposal. 
The subsequent receipt of deferred and contingent consideration amounts is reflected 
in the above table as a positive amount of disposal proceeds and a negative 
movement in amounts receivable on sale of debt and equity investments, resulting in 
no overall movement in profit on disposal.
16. Trade and other receivables
Current assets
2024
£m
2023
£m
Trade debtors
0.7
0.6
Prepayments
0.8
0.8
Interest receivable
1.3
2.9
Other receivables
3.5
3.9
Trade and other receivables
6.3
8.2
The Directors consider the carrying amount of trade and other receivables at 
amortised cost to approximate their fair value. All receivables are interest free, 
repayable on demand and unsecured.
17. Receivable on sale of debt and equity investments
Accounting Policy:
Consideration in respect of the sale of debt and equity investments may include 
elements of deferred consideration where payment is received at a pre–agreed 
future date, and/or elements of contingent consideration where payment is 
received based on, for example, achievement of specific drug development 
milestones. In such instances, these amounts are designated at fair value through 
profit and loss on initial recognition. Any subsequent remeasurement will be 
recognised as changes in fair value in the statement of comprehensive income.
2024
£m
2023
£m
Deferred and contingent consideration (non-current)
18.5
7.8
Deferred and contingent consideration (current)
1.6
1.4
Total deferred and contingent consideration
20.1
9.2
The following table summarises the primary valuation basis used to value the deferred 
and contingent consideration:
Investment
Primary Valuation Basis
2024
£m
2023
£m
Featurespace
Discounted sale amount
11.1
–
Oxular
Discounted sale amount
1.6
–
Kynos
Discounted sale amount
0.5
–
Garrison
Discounted sale amount
0.7
–
Enterprise 
Therapeutics 
Holdings Limited
Probability-weighted DCF model 
reflecting potential milestone 
payments
4.4
7.7
Zihipp Limited
Probability-weighted DCF model 
reflecting potential milestone 
payments
1.8
1.5
Total
20.1
9.2
144	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

18. Trade and other payables
Current liabilities
2024
£m
2023
£m
Trade payables
0.3
0.5
Social security expenses
0.6
0.6
Bonus accrual
2.7
3.0
Lease liability
1.0
1.4
Payable to Imperial College and other third parties  
under revenue share obligations 
3.4
6.9
Other accruals and deferred income
4.5
4.7
Trade and other payables
12.5
17.1
19. Borrowings and Loans from Limited Partners  
of consolidated funds
Current liabilities
2024
£m
2023
£m
Borrowings
6.3
6.3
Total
6.3
6.3
Non–current liabilities
2024
£m
2023
£m
Loans drawn down from the Limited Partners  
of consolidated funds
19.9
19.8
Borrowings
122.8
128.9
Total
142.7
148.7
Loans drawn down from the Limited Partners of  
consolidated funds
Accounting Policy:
The Group consolidates the assets of a co–investment fund, IP Venture Fund II LP, 
which it manages. Loans from third parties of consolidated funds represent third–
party LP loans into this partnership. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership 
Agreement, these loans are repayable only upon these funds generating sufficient 
realisations to repay the Limited Partners. Management anticipates that the funds 
will generate the required returns and consequently recognises the full associated 
liabilities. 
The classification of these loans as non–current reflects the forecast timing of returns 
and subsequent repayment of loans, which is not anticipated to occur within one year.
As at 31 December, loans from Limited Partners of consolidated funds comprised loans 
into IP Venture Fund II LP £19.9m (2023: £19.8m).
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
145
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Borrowings
Accounting Policy:
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently carried at amortised cost; any difference between the 
proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income over the period of the borrowing using 
the effective interest rate method. Costs incurred in the course of issuing additional debt are recognised on the balance sheet and charged to the income statement on a 
straight line basis over the term of the borrowings.
In 2023, the Group drew a second £60m tranche of the £120m private placing it agreed with investors including Phoenix Group in 2022. The terms of the facilities are 
summarised below:
Description
Initial amount
Outstanding 
amount
Date drawn
Interest rate
Repayment commencement 
date & terms 
EIB Facility 
£50.0m
£9.4m
Feb 2017
Fixed 3.026%
Repayable over 8 years from 
Jul 2018
IP Group Series A Notes
£20.0m
£20.0m
Dec 2022
Fixed 5.230%
Repayable in full in Dec 2027
IP Group Series B Notes
£20.0m
£20.0m
Dec 2022
Fixed 5.210%
Repayable in full in Dec 2028
IP Group Series C Notes
£20.0m
£20.0m
Dec 2022
Fixed 5.300%
Repayable in full in Dec 2029 
IP Group Series D Notes
£20.0m
£20.0m
Jun 2023
Fixed 5.230%
Repayable in full in Dec 2027 
IP Group Series E Notes
£20.0m
£20.0m
Jun 2023
Fixed 5.210%
Repayable in full in Dec 2028
IP Group Series F Notes
£20.0m
£20.0m
Jun 2023
Fixed 5.300%
Repayable in full in Dec 2029
Total
£170.0m
£129.4m
Loans totalling £129.4m (2023: £135.6m) are subject to fixed interest rates and are 
recognised at amortised cost. The fair value of these loans as at 31 December 2024 is 
£118.7m (2023: £125.3m).
In December 2022, the Group drew down the first Tranche of £60m of a £120m loan 
Note Purchase Agreement (“NPA”) and a further £60m in June 2023. The NPA contains 
the following covenants:
•	
Total equity must be at least £500m as at the Group’s 30 June and 31 December 
reporting dates
•	
Gross debt less restricted cash must not exceed 25% of total equity as at the 
Group’s 30 June and 31 December reporting dates
•	
The Group must maintain cash and cash equivalents of not less than £25m at 
any time
Breach of any of the above covenants constitutes default under the NPA.
The NPA also includes a ‘Cash Trap’ mechanism, which is triggered based on 
conditions listed below. In the event of the Cash Trap being triggered, the Group is 
not permitted to pay or declare a dividend or purchase any of its shares. In addition, 
investments are restricted to £2.5m per calendar quarter other than those legally 
committed to. The Group is also required to place the net proceeds of all realisations 
(over a threshold of £1m) into a blocked bank account. Entering a Cash Trap does not 
constitute a default under the NPA.
A Cash Trap period is entered if any of the following conditions are breached.
•	
Total equity must be at least £750m as at the Group’s 30 June and 31 December 
reporting dates
•	
Gross debt less restricted cash must not exceed 20% of total equity as at the 
Group’s 30 June and 31 December reporting dates
•	
The Group must maintain cash and cash equivalents of not less than £50m at 
any time. 
146	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
19. Borrowings and Loans from Limited Partners of consolidated funds continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

A cash trap period can be remedied by:
•	
Transferring sufficient cash into the restricted cash account so that gross debt less 
restricted cash is less than 20% of total equity
•	
If because of low equity of high leverage, once these are restored at a subsequent 
30 June or 31 December measurement date
•	
If because of low liquidity, once two month-ends have passed with liquidity > £50m
The EIB loan contains a debt covenant requiring that the ratio of the total fair value 
of IP Group investments plus cash and qualifying liquidity to debt should at no time 
fall below 6:1. The Group must maintain an amount of unencumbered funds freely 
available to the Group set with reference to the outstanding EIB facility which was 
£9.4m at December 2024 (2023: £15.6m). The loan also stipulates that on any date, the 
aggregate of all amounts scheduled for payment to the EIB in the following six months 
should be kept in a separate bank account, which totalled £3.2m on 31 December 2024 
(2023: £3.3m) The Group is required to maintain a minimum cash balance of £5.6m 
(2023: £9.4m). 
The Group closely monitors that the covenants are adhered to on an ongoing basis 
and has complied with these covenants throughout the year. The Group will continue 
to monitor the covenants’ position against forecasts and budgets to ensure that it 
operates within the prescribed limits.
The NPA includes fixed and floating charges over the Company’s assets, details of 
which are available on Companies House. The EIB loan includes certain guarantees 
over assets held by Touchstone Innovations Business LLP.
The maturity profile of the borrowings including undiscounted cash flows and fixed 
interest is as follows:
 
2024
£m
2023
£m
Due within 6 months
6.2
6.4
Due 6 to 12 months
6.3
6.4
Due 1 to 5 years
141.8
112.4
Due after 5 years
–
42.1
Total1
154.3
167.3
The maturity profile of the borrowings was as follows:
2024
£m
2023
£m
Due within 6 months
3.1
3.1
Due 6 to 12 months
3.1
3.1
Due 1 to 5 years
123.2
89.4
Due after 5 years
–
40.0
Total1
129.4
135.6
1	
These are gross amounts repayable and exclude amortised costs of £0.4m (2023: £0.4m) 
incurred on obtaining the Phoenix loans, these are amortised on a straight-line basis over the life 
of the borrowings.
A reconciliation in the movement in borrowings is as follows:
2024
£m
2023
£m
At 1 January
135.2
81.4
Repayment of debt 
(6.1)
(6.2)
New borrowings
–
60.0
At 31 December
129.1
135.2
There were no non–cash movements in debt.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
147
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
19. Borrowings and Loans from Limited Partners of 
consolidated funds continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

20. Share capital
Accounting Policy:
Financial instruments issued by the Group are treated as equity if the holders have only a residual interest in the Group’s assets after deducting all liabilities. The objective of 
the Group is to manage capital so as to provide shareholders with above-average returns through capital growth over the medium-to-long term. The Group considers its 
capital to comprise its share capital, share premium, merger reserve and retained earnings.
Issued and fully paid:
2024
2023
Number
£m
Number
£m
Ordinary shares of 2p each
At 1 January
1,063,188,005
21.3
1,063,188,005
21.3
Shares purchased and cancelled
(20,609,101)
(0.4)
–
–
Cancellation of shares held in Treasury
(67,292,636)
(1.4)
–
–
Share capital at 31 December
975,286,268
19.5
1,063,188,005
21.3
Existing treasury shares at 1 January
(26,493,520)
(0.5)
(28,110,373)
(0.6)
Purchase of treasury shares
(45,280,605)
(0.9)
(220,302)
–
Cancellation of treasury shares
67,292,636
1.3
–
–
Shares transferred out of treasury for SAYE
–
–
285,335
–
Settlement of employee share-based payments
4,481,489
0.1
1,551,820
–
Outstanding at 31 December
975,286,268
19.5
1,036,694,485
20.7
The Company has one class of ordinary shares with a par value of 2p (“Ordinary Shares”) which carry equal voting rights, equal rights to income and distributions of assets on 
liquidation, or otherwise, and no right to fixed income.
During 2024, the Company purchased 45,280,605 ordinary shares (2023: 200,302 ordinary shares), with an aggregate value of £0.9m (2023: £0.2k) which were initially held in 
treasury. These were subsequently used to settle employee share based payments of 4,481,489 prior to the remainder being cancelled in September 2024 along with a further 
26,493,520 treasury shares held at the start of the year which were also cancelled at the same time. A further 20,609,101 shares with an aggregate value of £0.5m were purchased 
in the period September to December 2024 and immediately cancelled. The nominal value of the cancelled treasury share has been added to the Capital redemption reserve.
Retained profits have been reduced by £29.6m (2023: £0.2k), being the net consideration paid for the purchase of treasury, including expenses directly relating to the treasury 
share purchase.
148	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

21. Share–based payments
In 2024, the Group continued to incentivise employees through its RSP and AIS. The 
main terms of both are described in more detail in the Directors’ Remuneration Report 
on pages 78 to 100.
Deferred bonus share plan (“DBSP”)
Awards made to employees under the Group’s AIS above a certain threshold include 
50% deferred into IP Group equity through the grant of nil–cost options under the 
Group’s DBSP. The number of nil–cost options granted under the Group’s DBSP is 
determined by the share price at the vesting date. The DBSP options are subject to 
further time–based vesting over two years (typically 50% after year one and 50% after 
year two).
An analysis of movements in the DBSP options outstanding is as follows:
Number of 
options
2024
Weighted-
average 
exercise 
price
2024
Number 
of options
2023
Weighted-
average 
exercise 
price
2023
At 1 January
2,153,379
–
2,556,682
–
AIS deferral shares award 
during the year 
1,578,434
–
1,120,292
–
Exercised during the year 
(1,593,233)
–
(1,523,595)
–
At 31 December
2,138,580
–
2,153,379
–
Exercisable at 31 December
–
–
–
–
1,643,895 shares were transferred from treasury in respect of DBSP scheme during 
the year, comprising 1,593,233 DBSP options exercised on 23rd April 2024 and a further 
50,662 shares relating to dividends accrued on those options.
The options outstanding at 31 December 2024 had an exercise price of £nil (2023: £nil) 
and a weighted–average remaining contractual life of 0.6 years (2023: 0.5 years).
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised 
in 2024 was 48.3p (2023: 61.0p). 
As the 2024 AIS financial performance targets were met and as the number of DBSP 
options to be granted in order to defer such elements of the AIS payments as are 
required under our remuneration policy are based on a percentage of employees’ 
salary, the share–based payments line includes the associated share–based 
payments expense incurred in 2024.
IP Group Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”)
As set out in the Remuneration Policy approved by shareholders in 2022, a Restricted 
Share Plan was introduced in 2022 to replace the previous LTIP structure. Vesting of 
these awards will take place over a three-year period, with any awards that vest 
subject to a further two-year holding period. For 2022, 2023 and 2024 awards, a 
financial underpin exists which may result in awards lapsing if NAV per share on the 
vesting date is lower than 100% of NAV per share on the award date, after making 
appropriate adjustments for dividends. Further information on the Group’s RSP is set 
out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 91.
The 2024 RSP awards were made on 23 April 2024. The awards will ordinarily vest on 
31 March 2026, to the extent that the performance underpin has been met. 
The movement in the number of shares conditionally awarded under the RSP is set 
out below:
Number of 
options
2024
Weighted-
average 
exercise 
price
2024
Number 
of options
2023
Weighted-
average 
exercise 
price
2023
At 1 January
10,238,863
–
3,458,509
–
Forfeited during the year
(1,362,198)
–
(16,367)
–
Notionally awarded during 
the year
8,833,966
–
6,796,721
–
At 31 December
17,710,631
–
10,238,863
–
Exercisable at 31 December
–
–
–
–
The options outstanding at 31 December 2024 had an exercise price of £nil (2023: £nil) 
and a weighted–average remaining contractual life of 3.5 years (2023: 3.9 years).
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
149
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

The fair value of the RSP shares notionally awarded in 2024 was calculated using the 
Finnerty pricing model with the following key assumptions:
2024
2023
IP Group share price as of valuation date
£0.539
£0.602
Exercise price
£nil
£nil
Indicated discount for lack of marketability
15%
15%
Adjusted probability assigned for performance conditions
20%
20%
Fair value at grant date
£0.21
£0.24
Pre-2022 IP Group Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) 
Awards under the historic LTIP scheme took the form of conditional awards of 
ordinary shares of 2p each in the Group which vest over the prescribed performance 
period to the extent that performance conditions have been met. The Remuneration 
Committee imposes objective conditions on the vesting of awards and these take into 
consideration the guidance of the Group’s institutional investors from time to time. 
General information on the Group’s LTIP is set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report 
on page 94.
The 2021 LTIP awards were made on 6 May 2021. Following the completion of the 
performance period on 31 March 2024, the relevant performance targets for vesting of 
the 2021 LTIP award were not met and these options lapsed in full. 
Following the lapse of the 2021 awards noted above, and the exercise of vested options 
under the 2019 scheme during the year, the only remaining outstanding conditionally 
awarded shares relate to the 2020 awards, which vested in 2023 and will be exercised 
in the first half of 2025 following completion of their two-year post-vesting mandatory 
holding period.
The movement in the number of shares conditionally awarded under the LTIP is set 
out below:
Number of 
options
2024
Weighted-
average 
exercise 
price
2024
Number of 
options 
2023
Weighted-
average 
exercise 
price
2023
At 1 January
7,728,493
–
14,490,039
–
Lapsed during the year
(3,950,040)
–
(6,759,628)
–
Forfeited during the year
(10,907)
–
(1,918)
–
Exercised during the year
(2,703,041)
–
–
–
At 31 December
1,064,505
–
7,728,493
–
Exercisable at 31 December
1,064,505
–
4,596,014
–
2,837,594 shares were transferred from treasury in respect of the exercise of 2019 LTIPs, 
comprising 2,703,041 conditionally awarded shares exercised on 23rd April 2024 and a 
further 134,553 shares relating to dividends accrued on those conditionally awarded 
shares.
The conditionally awarded shares at 31 December 2024 had an exercise price in the 
range of £nil (2023: £nil) and a weighted–average remaining contractual life of 0.3 
years (2023: 0.8 years).
The fair value charge recognised in the statement of comprehensive income during 
the year in respect of all share–based payments, including the DBSP, RSP and LTIP was 
£1.9m (2023: £2.6m).
The aggregate gain made by Directors on the exercise of options in the year was 
£0.4m (2023: £0.2m).
150	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
21. Share–based payments continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

22. Long–term incentive carry scheme  
– Carried interest plan liability
Accounting Policy:
The Group operates a number of Long-Term Incentive Carry Schemes (“LTICS”) for 
eligible employees which may result in payments to scheme participants relating 
to returns from investments. 
Under the Group’s LTICS arrangements, a profit–sharing mechanism exists 
whereby if a specific vintage (being a group investment made within a defined 
time period) delivers returns in excess of the base cost of investments together 
with an agreed hurdle rate, scheme participants receive a share of excess returns. 
Of the Group’s total equity and debt investments 65% are included in LTICS 
arrangements (2023: 69.0%).
The calculation of the liability in respect of the Group’s LTICS is derived from the 
fair value estimates for the relevant portfolio investments and does not involve 
significant additional judgement (although the fair value of the portfolio is a 
significant accounting estimate). The actual amounts of carried interest paid 
will depend on the cash realisations of individual vintages, and valuations may 
change significantly in the next financial year. Movements in the liability are 
recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
2024
£m
2023
£m
At 1 January
38.0
44.1 
Credit for the year
(7.9)
(4.7) 
Payments made in the year
(2.5)
(1.3)
Foreign exchange rate movement
(0.3)
(0.1)
At 31 December
27.3
38.0
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
151
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

23. Related party transactions
The Group has various related parties arising from its key management, subsidiaries and equity stakes in portfolio companies. 
A) Key management transactions
(i) Key management personnel transactions
The following key management held shares in the following spin–out companies as at 31 December 2024:
Director/PDMR
Company name
Number of 
shares held at 
1 January 
2024
Number 
of shares 
acquired/ 
(disposed of) 
in the period
Number of 
shares held at 
31 December 
2024
%
Greg Smith
Alesi Surgical Limited
2
–
2
<0.1%
Crysalin Limited (dissolved)
149
–
–
–
Emdot Limited
4
–
4
0.23%
Istesso Limited
313,425
–
313,425
0.37%
Itaconix plc1
90
–
90
<0.1%
Mirriad Advertising plc
16,667
–
16,667
<0.1%
Oxa Autonomy Limited
8
–
8
<0.1%
Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc 
27,008
–
27,008
<0.1%
Rio AI Limited
144,246
–
144,246
<0.1%
Surrey Nanosystems Limited
88
–
88
<0.1%
Tissue Regenix Group plc
500
–
500
<0.1%
Xeros Technology plc 
13
–
13
<0.1%
David Baynes
Alesi Surgical Limited
4
–
4
<0.1%
Arkivum Limited
377
–
377
<0.1%
Creavo Medical Technologies Limited (dissolved)
46
 –
–
–
Mirriad Advertising plc
16,667
–
16,667
<0.1%
Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc
2,784
–
2,784
<0.1%
Ultraleap Holdings Limited
2,600
–
2,600
<0.1%
Zeetta Networks Limited
424
–
424
0.11%
152	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Director/PDMR
Company name
Number of 
shares held at 
1 January 
2024
Number 
of shares 
acquired/ 
(disposed of) 
in the period
Number of 
shares held at 
31 December 
2024
%
Mark Reilly
Actual Experience plc2
28,000
–
28,000
<0.1%
AudioScenic Limited
53
–
53
<0.1%
Bramble Energy Limited
16
–
16
<0.1%
Diffblue Limited
8,038
–
8,038
<0.1%
Itaconix plc1
7,547
–
7,547
<0.1%
Mirriad Advertising plc
66,666
–
66,666
<0.1%
Mixergy Limited
126
–
126
<0.1%
Oxa Autonomy Ltd
8
–
8
<0.1%
Ultraleap Holdings Limited
1,700
–
1,700
<0.1%
From 13 May 2024, Sam Williams ceased to act as a Person Discharging Management Responsibility. Shares he held in spin–out companies up to this date are disclosed as follows:
Director/PDMR
Company name
Number of 
shares held at 
1 January 
2024
Number 
of shares 
acquired/ 
(disposed of) 
in the period
Number of 
shares held at 
13 May 2024
%
Sam Williams
Accelercomm Limited
127
–
127
<0.1%
Alesi Surgical Limited
1
–
1
<0.1%
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
3,247
–
3,247
<0.1%
Creavo Medical Technologies Limited (dissolved)
23
–
23
<0.1%
Genomics plc
333
–
333
<0.1%
Ibex Innovations Limited
1,701
–
1,701
<0.1%
Istesso Limited
7,048,368
–
7,048,368
8.29%
Microbiotica Limited
7,000
–
7,000
<0.1%
Mirriad Advertising plc
3,333
–
3,333
<0.1%
Oxa Autonomy Ltd
3
–
3
<0.1%
Oxehealth Limited
65
–
65
<0.1%
Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc
25,609
–
25,609
<0.1%
Topivert Limited2
1,000
–
1,000
<0.1%
Ultraleap Holdings Limited
558
–
558
<0.1%
1	
Opening position restated to reflect share consolidation.
2	 Company being closed down.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
153
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
23. Related party transactions continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Policy for Executive Director holdings in portfolio companies
The policy for Executive Director shareholdings in portfolio companies specifies:
•	
New direct investments in portfolio companies by Executive Directors are 
prohibited, with the exception of the take-up of pre-emption rights which relate 
to existing portfolio company shareholdings. Both Mr Smith and Mr Baynes are 
covered by this policy.
•	
Mr Smith and Mr Baynes have voluntarily submitted to an additional binding 
condition such that any net proceeds received as a result of realisations 
from direct holdings in portfolio companies that exceed £250,000 will be used 
to purchase shares in IP Group, until such time as they meet the Minimum 
Shareholding Requirement set for their role (currently 350% of annual salary for Mr 
Smith, 250% for Mr Baynes).
(ii) Key management personnel compensation
Key management personnel compensation comprised the following:
2024
£000
2023
£000
Short–term employee benefits1
2,176
3,091
Post–employment benefits2
48
108
Share–based payments3
615
1,161
Total
2,839
4,360
1	
Represents key management personnel’s base salaries, benefits including cash in lieu of pension 
where relevant, and the cash–settled element of the Annual Incentive Scheme.
2	  Represents employer contributions to defined contribution pension and life assurance plans.
3	  Represents the accounting charge for share-based payments, reflecting LTIP and DBSP options 
currently in issue as part of these schemes. See note 21 for a detailed description of these 
schemes.
B) Portfolio companies
(i) Services
The Group earns fees from the provision of business support services and corporate 
finance advisory services to portfolio companies in which the Group has an equity 
stake. Through the lack of control over portfolio companies these fees are considered 
arm’s length transactions. The following amounts have been included in respect of 
these fees:
Statement of comprehensive income
2024
£m
2023
£m
Revenue from services
–
–
Statement of financial position
2024
£m
2023
£m
Trade receivables
0.1
0.1
(ii) Investments
The Group makes investments in the equity and debt of unquoted and quoted 
investments where it does not have control but may be able to participate in the 
financial and operating policies of that company. It is presumed that it is possible 
to exert significant influence when the equity holding is greater than 20%. The Group 
has taken the Venture Capital Organisation exception as permitted by IAS 28 and not 
recognised these companies as associates, but they are related parties. The total 
amounts included for investments where the Group has significant influence but not 
control are as follows:
Statement of comprehensive income
2024
£m
2023
£m
Net portfolio (losses)/gains
(125.7)
31.7
Statement of financial position
2024
£m
2023
£m
Equity and debt investments
345.8
566.4
154	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
23. Related party transactions continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

C) Subsidiary companies
Subsidiary companies that are not 100% owned either directly or indirectly by 
the parent Company have intercompany balances (which are eliminated at a 
consolidated level) with other Group companies which are disclosed as follows:
2024
£m
2023
£m
Intercompany balances with other Group companies
2.2
2.1
These intercompany balances represent funding loans provided by Group companies 
that are interest free, repayable on demand and unsecured.
24. Capital management
The Group’s key objective when managing capital, as set out in note 20, is to safeguard 
the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern so that it can continue to provide 
returns for shareholders and employees for other stakeholders. The Group sets the 
amount of capital in proportion to risk. The Group manages the capital structure, 
and makes adjustments to it, in light of changes in economic conditions and the 
risk characteristics of its underlying assets. In order to maintain or adjust the capital 
structure, the Group may adjust the amount of issued share capital, issue or repay 
debt and dispose of interests in portfolio companies.
During 2024, the Group’s strategy, which was unchanged from 2023, was to maintain 
an appropriate level of cash and short-term deposit balances in line with the Group’s 
capital allocation plans, whilst having sufficient cash reserves to meet working capital 
requirements in the foreseeable future.
The Group has external borrowings with associated covenants that are described in 
note 19. These include covenants around the Group’s minimum equity and maximum 
debt/equity ratio. Consideration is given to the level of headroom against these 
covenants as part of the Group’s capital allocation process where planning corporate 
actions such as dividends and share buybacks, which have an impact on the 
headroom level. 
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
155
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
23. Related party transactions continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

25. Capital commitments
Commitments to Limited Partnerships
Pursuant to the terms of their Limited Partnership agreements, the Group has committed to invest the following amounts into Limited Partnerships as at 31 December 2024:
Year ended 31 December 2024
Year of 
commencement 
of commitment
Commitment
Invested
 to date
Remaining 
commitment
£m
£m
£m
IP Venture Fund II LP
2013
10.0
10.0
–
UCL Technology Fund LP
2016
24.8
23.4
1.4
Total at 31 December 2024
34.8
33.4
1.4
Year ended 31 December 2023
Year of 
commencement 
of commitment
Commitment
Invested
 to date
Remaining 
commitment
£m
£m
£m
IP Venture Fund II LP
2013
10.0
9.9
0.1
UCL Technology Fund LP
2016
24.8
23.2
1.6
Total at 31 December 2023
34.8
33.1
1.7
26. Dividends and share buyback
2024 pence 
per share
 £m
2023 pence 
per share
£m
Ordinary shares:
Interim dividend
–
–
0.51
5.3
Final dividend
–
–
0.76
7.7
Dividends paid to equity owners in the financial year
–
–
1.27
13.0
Proposed final dividend at financial year end
–
–
–
–
There were no dividends paid or proposed in 2024 (2023: £13.0m dividends; £13.0m settled in cash). Due to the limited take up of scrip dividends the scheme was discontinued in 
prior years.
Share buyback
On 18 December 2023 the Group initiated a share buyback of up to £20 million. This £20m share buyback tranche completed in September 2024. On 7th October 2024 it was 
announced to increase the Group’s share buyback programme by a further £10m which was completed on 7 January 2025. 
In January 2025 the Group launched a further extension by up to £40m of its buyback programme, which had been announced in December 2024. In March 2025, as part of the 
Group’s preliminary results statement, the Group announced Intention to extend buyback programme by a further £10m.
The Board remains committed to making regular cash returns to shareholders from realisations. In future these regular cash returns will normally be made in the form of share buybacks 
when the share price discount to NAV exceeds 20%. Regular dividend payments will be suspended under such conditions, including consideration of any final dividend for 2024.
156	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

27. Alternative performance measures (“APM”)
IP Group management believes that the alternative performance measures included in this document provide valuable information to the readers of the financial statements 
as they enable the reader to identify a consistent basis for comparing the business’ performance between financial periods and provide more detail concerning the elements 
of performance which the managers of the Group are most directly able to influence or are relevant for an assessment of the Group. They also reflect an important aspect 
of the way in which operating targets are defined and performance is monitored by the Directors. These measures are not defined by IFRS and therefore may not be directly 
comparable with other companies’ APMs, including those in the Group’s industry. APMs should be considered in addition to, and are not intended to be a substitute for, or superior 
to, IFRS measurements.
The Directors believe that these APMs assist in providing additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. Consequently, APMs are 
used by the Directors and management for performance analysis, planning, reporting and incentive–setting purposes.
Calculation
APM
Reference for 
reconciliation
Definition and purpose
2024
£m
2023
£m
NAV 
per share1
Primary 
statements 
note 20
NAV per share is defined as Net Assets divided by the number of outstanding shares.
The measure shows net assets managed on behalf of shareholders by the Group per 
outstanding share. 
NAV per share is a standard measure used within our peer group and can be directly 
compared with the Group’s share price.
NAV
£952.5m
£1,190.3m
Shares in issue
975,286,268
1,036,694,485
NAV per share
97.7p
114.8p
Return  
on NAV
Primary 
statements  
note 4
Return on NAV is defined as the total comprehensive income or loss for the year 
excluding charges which do not impact on net assets, specifically share–based 
payment charges.
The measure shows a summary of the income statement gains and losses which 
directly impact NAV.
Total  
comprehensive  
income
(210.0)
(174.8)
Excluding:
Share-based 
payment charge
1.9
2.6
Return on NAV
(208.1)
(172.2)
Net portfolio 
gains/
(losses)
note 13, 14, 15
Net portfolio gains/(losses) are defined as the movement in the value of holdings in the 
portfolio due as a result of realised and unrealised gains and losses.
The measure shows a summary of the income statement gains and losses which are 
directly attributable to the total portfolio (see definition above), which is a headline 
measure for the Group’s portfolio performance. 
This is a key driver of the Return on NAV which is a performance metric for Directors’ and 
employees’ incentives.
Change in fair value 
of equity and debt 
investments
(246.1)
(110.9)
Gain/(loss) on 
disposal of equity 
investments
63.7
(10.8)
Change in fair value 
of LP interests2
(12.6)
(38.8)
Net portfolio 
(losses)
(195.0)
(160.5)
Total 
portfolio3
Consolidated 
statement 
of financial 
position,
 note 13, 14
Total portfolio is defined as the total of equity investments, debt investments and 
investments in LPs. 
This measure represents the aggregate balance sheet amounts which the Group 
considers to be its investment portfolio, and which is described in further detail within the 
portfolio review section of the strategic report.
Equity investments
713.8
1,011.5
Debt investments
51.6
83.7
LP interests
58.1
69.7
Assets held for sale
13.9
–
Total portfolio
837.4
1,164.9
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
157
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Calculation
APM
Reference for 
reconciliation
Definition and purpose
2024
£m
2023
£m
Portfolio 
investment 
Primary 
statements
Portfolio investment is defined as the purchase of equity and debt investments plus 
investments into limited partnership interests.
This gives a combined measure of investment into the Group’s portfolio.
Purchase of 
equity and debt 
investments
(60.8)
(63.4)
Investment in limited 
and limited liability 
partnerships
(2.2)
(9.8)
Portfolio investment 
(63.0)
(73.2)
Cash 
proceeds1
Primary 
statements 
Cash proceeds is defined as the proceeds from the disposal of equity and debt 
investments plus distributions received from limited partnership interests.
Proceeds from 
the sale of equity 
investments
182.2
37.7
Distributions 
from limited 
partnership funds
1.2
0.9
Cash proceeds
183.4
38.6
Net 
overheads2
Financial 
review, note 8 
Net overheads are defined as the Group’s core overheads less operating income. The 
measure reflects the Group’s controllable net operating “cash–equivalent” central 
cost base.
Other income
5.5
5.9
Other administrative 
expenses
 (25.3)
 (28.0)
Excluding:
Non-portfolio 
foreign exchange 
movements
(2.7)
 (0.4)
Restructuring costs 
– labour 
2.4
–
Restructuring costs 
– professional
0.3
–
Net overheads
(19.8)
(22.5)
Gross 
cash and 
deposits
Primary 
statements
Cash and deposits is defined as cash and cash equivalents plus deposits.
Cash and cash 
equivalents
115.6
100.9
Deposit
170.0
126.0
Gross cash and 
deposits
285.6
226.9
158	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
27. Alternative performance measures (“APM”) continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Calculation
APM
Reference for 
reconciliation
Definition and purpose
2024
£m
2023
£m
Loss 
excluding  
ONT
Primary 
statements
(Loss)/profit excluding ONT is defined as the Groups (loss)/profit for the year (after tax) 
excluding the (loss)/profit on the investment held in Oxford Nanopore publicly quoted 
shares both realised and unrealised.
This measure gives a view of the results of this business excluding this single investment 
which, given its size and recent share price volatility, may be helpful to users of the 
accounts as a view of the underlying business.
(Loss) for the year
(207.0)
(174.4)
Excluding:
Change in fair value 
of equity investment 
in Oxford Nanopore
66.3
31.9
(Loss)/profit 
excluding ONT
(140.7)
(142.5)
Simple 
return on 
capital (%)
Note 27 
Defined as net portfolio gains/losses divided by the opening total portfolio value.
This measure gives a view of the size of portfolio gains or losses relative to the opening 
portfolio value, giving useful additional context for the value of gains or losses.
Net portfolio (losses)
(195.0)
(160.5)
Opening total 
portfolio value
1,164.9
1,258.5 
Simple return on 
capital (%)
(17%)
(13%)
% Return on 
NAV (%)
Note 27 
(return on 
NAV) Primary 
statements 
(Net 
Asset Value)
Defined as return on NAV divided by the opening Net Asset Value.
This measure gives a view of the size of Return on NAV relative to the opening Net Asset 
Value, giving useful additional context for the value of returns.
Return on NAV
(208.1)
(172.2)
Opening Net 
Asset Value
1,190.3
1,376.1
Return on NAV (%)
(17%)
(13%)
1	
For consistency with how we report investments as the purchase of equity and debt investments plus investment in limited and limited liability partnerships, the Directors believe that this new measure 
showing cash proceeds is defined as the proceeds from the disposal of equity and debt investments plus distributions received from limited liability partnerships interests profit represents a useful 
additional measure for users of the accounts.
2	  For clarity non-portfolio foreign exchange movements have been excluded from net overheads, these exchange movements are on intercompany loans and other balance sheet items including cash, 
and which do not represent an ongoing overhead cost for the group. Their exclusion is therefore considered to give a more accurate view of the underlying net overhead costs of the business.
3	  At 31 December 2024, the Group was in the process of disposing of a number of assets, which were accordingly reclassified within current assets as Assets Held for Sale. These assets are considered to 
be part of the Group’s investment portfolio and have been managed as such throughout the period. Accordingly, the APM has been amended to included Assets Held for Sale within the Group’s Total 
portfolio APM.
28. Post balance sheet events
As at 21 March 2025, unrealised fair value losses in respect of the Group’s quoted portfolio totalled £14.7m, largely in respect of Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc, which has seen 
a fair value loss of £13.8m since 31 December 2024.
The Group was notified of the outcome of Istesso’s Phase 2b trial for Leramistat in February 2025, reflecting information which Istesso Limited had received prior to 
31 December 2024. 
Since 1 January 2025, the Group has delivered cash proceeds of £24.7m.
In January 2025 the Group launched a further extension by up to £40m of its buyback programme, which had been announced in December 2024. In March 2025, as part of the 
Group’s preliminary results statement, the Group announced Intention to extend buyback programme by a further £10m.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
159
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
27. Alternative performance measures (“APM”) continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Note
2024
£m
2023
£m
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Investment in subsidiary undertakings
2
331.5
330.4
Equity and debt investments
3
3.5
3.5
Limited liability partnership interests
4
2.3
2.9
Loans to subsidiary undertakings: long term
5
605.0
640.9
Total non-current assets
942.3
977.9
Current assets
Loans to subsidiary undertakings: short term
5
0.9
0.9
Trade receivables
1.9
–
Cash & cash equivalent
–
–
Total current assets
2.8
0.9
Total assets
945.1
978.6
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Capital and reserves
Called-up share capital
6
19.5
21.3
Share premium account
6
102.5
102.8
Capital redemption reserve
6
1.8
–
Retained earnings
6
700.7
734.0
Total equity attributable to equity holders
824.5
858.1
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
0.9
0.9
Total current liabilities
0.9
0.9
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
119.7
119.6
Deferred tax liability
–
–
Total non-current liabilities
119.7
119.6
Total liabilities
120.6
120.5
Total equity and liabilities
945.1
978.6
160	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
COMPANY BALANCE SHEET.
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2024
Registered number: 04204490
The Company has taken advantage of the exemption granted 
by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 whereby no 
individual income statement of the Company is disclosed. 
The Company’s loss for the financial year was £5.9m 
(loss: 2023: £5.8m).
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial 
statements. The financial statements on pages 117 to 174 were 
approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 
24 March 2025 and were signed on its behalf by: signed on its 
behalf by:
Greg Smith	
David Baynes
Chief Executive Officer	
Chief Financial Officer
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Share
capital
£m
Share
premium(i)
£m
Capital 
redemption 
reserve(iii)
£m
Retained
earnings(ii)
£m
Total
£m
At 1 January 2023
21.3 
102.8 
–
750.3 
874.4 
Total comprehensive income for the period 
Loss for the year
–
–
–
(5.8)
(5.8)
Total comprehensive income for the period
–
–
–
(5.8)
(5.8)
Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity
Purchase of treasury shares(iii)
–
–
–
(0.1)
(0.1)
Equity-settled share-based payments(iv)
–
–
–
2.6
2.6
Ordinary dividends(v)
–
–
–
(13.0)
(13.0)
Total contributions by and distributions to owners
–
–
–
(10.5)
(10.5)
At 1 January 2024
21.3 
102.8
–
734.0
858.1
Total comprehensive income for the period
Loss for the year
–
–
–
(5.9)
(5.9)
Total comprehensive income for the period 
–
–
–
(5.9)
(5.9)
Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity
Other movements
–
(0.3)
–
0.3
–
Purchase of treasury shares(iii)
(1.8)
–
1.8
(29.6)
(29.6)
Equity-settled share-based payments(iv)
–
–
–
1.9
1.9
Ordinary dividends(v)
–
–
–
–
–
Total contributions by and distributions to owners
(1.8)
(0.3)
1.8
(27.4)
(27.7)
At 31 December 2024
19.5
102.5
1.8
700.7
824.5
I	 Share premium – Amount subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value, net of directly attributable issue costs.
ii	 Retained earnings – Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income net of associated share-based 
payments credits and distributions to shareholders. 
iii	 Purchase of treasury shares – During 2024, the Company purchased 45,280,605 ordinary shares (2023: 200,302 ordinary shares), with an aggregate 
value of £0.9m (2023: £0.1m) which were initially held in treasury. These were subsequently used to settle employee share-based payments of 
4,481,489 prior to the remainder being cancelled in September 2024 along with a further 26,493,520 treasury shares held at the start of the year 
which were also cancelled at the same time. A further 20,609,101 shares with an aggregate value of £0.5m were purchased in the period September 
to December 2024 and immediately cancelled. The nominal value of the cancelled treasury share has been added to the Capital redemption 
reserve. 
iv	 Equity-settled share-based payments – amounts recognised in respect of the Group’s share-based payments schemes recognised as a subsidiary 
investment in the Company accounts with a corresponding entry against equity.
v	 Ordinary dividends – there were no dividends paid in 2024 (2023: £13.0m total; £13.0m cash). No new shares were issued in respect of the scrip 
dividend (2023: no shares issued).
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
161
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY.
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2024
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

1. Accounting policies
These financial statements were prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting 
Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework (“FRS 101”).
In preparing these financial statements, the Company applies the recognition, 
measurement and disclosure requirements of UK–adopted international accounting 
standards (“UK–adopted IFRS”) but makes amendments where necessary in order to 
comply with Companies Act 2006 and has set out below where advantage of the FRS 
101 disclosure exemptions has been taken.
Under section s408 of the Companies Act 2006 the company is exempt from the 
requirement to present its own profit and loss account.
In these financial statements, the Company has applied the exemptions available 
under FRS 101 in respect of the following disclosures: a cash flow statement and 
related notes; disclosures in respect of transactions with wholly owned subsidiaries; 
disclosures in respect of capital management; from presenting a comparative period 
reconciliation for share capital, the effects of new but not yet effective IFRSs; and 
disclosures of compensation of key management personnel.
As the consolidated financial statements include the equivalent disclosures, the 
Company has also taken the exemptions under FRS 101 available in respect of the 
following disclosures: IFRS 2 Share-Based Payments in respect of Group-settled share-
based payments; and certain disclosures required by IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement 
and the disclosures required by IFRS 7 Financial Instrument Disclosures.
The Company proposes to continue to adopt the reduced disclosure framework of FRS 
101 in its next financial statements.
The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise stated, been applied 
consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements.
Going concern
The parent Company financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis set 
out in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements of IP Group Plc.
Subsidiary investments
Investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less, where appropriate, provision for 
impairment. The Company tests the investment balances for impairment annually or 
whenever there is an indication that the value of carrying amount may not be recoverable. 
In light of the fact that the majority of the assets in the Company’s subsidiaries are 
recorded at fair value, subsidiary net assets are taken as an approximation of their 
minimum recoverable amount. If the carrying value of an investment in a subsidiary is 
in excess of the minimum recoverable amount, the value of the investment is impaired. 
Consideration has been given as to whether the fact that IP Group plc’s shares are 
trading at a discount to net asset value constitutes a trigger an impairment assessment 
for the value of the Company’s subsidiary investments. Given that the majority of the 
assets within the Company’s subsidiaries are held at fair value, the Directors do not 
believe that as a result of this assessment an additional impairment is required.
Equity and debt investments and Limited Liability  
Partnership interests
Equity investments, debt investments and investments in limited partnerships are 
categorised as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. This measurement 
basis is consistent with the fact that the Group’s performance in respect of 
investments in equity investments, limited partnerships and associated undertakings is 
evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with an established investment strategy.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value 
and any gains or losses arising from subsequent changes in fair value are presented in 
profit or loss in the statement of comprehensive income in the period which they arise.
The valuation methods applied are the same as those at the Group level; details of 
which can be found in note 13 to the Group’s financial accounts.
Intercompany loans
All intercompany loans are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently 
measured at amortised cost. Where intercompany loans are intended for use on 
a continuing basis in the Company’s activities, and there is no intention of their 
settlement in the foreseeable future, they are presented as non-current assets.
Financial instruments
Currently the Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments. Financial 
assets and financial liabilities are recognised and cease to be recognised on the basis 
of when the related titles pass to or from the Company.
Share-based payments
The Group operates a number of equity-settled share-based compensation schemes 
under which the employing subsidiary within the Group receives services from 
employees as consideration for equity instruments in IP Group plc. For further details 
on these schemes, see note 21 in the Group accounts. When options are exercised, the 
company issues new shares. The proceeds received net of any directly attributable 
costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and the balance to share 
premium. In the Company financial statements, the grant of share options is treated 
as a capital contribution. Specifically, the fair value of employee services received 
(measured at the date of grant) is recognised over the vesting period as an increase 
to investment in subsidiary undertakings, with a corresponding credit to equity in the 
parent entity financial statements.
Borrowings
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. 
Borrowings are subsequently carried at amortised cost; any difference between the 
proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the 
consolidated statement of comprehensive income over the period of the borrowing 
using the effective interest rate method. Costs incurred in the course of issuing 
additional debt are recognised on the balance sheet and charged to the income 
statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the borrowings.
162	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

2. Investments in subsidiary undertakings
2024
£m
2023
£m
At 1 January 
330.4
329.2 
Investment in respect of share-based payments
1.9
2.6
Impairment of subsidiary undertakings in the year
(0.8)
(1.4)
At 31 December 
331.5
330.4
Details of the Company’s subsidiary undertakings as at 31 December 2024 are detailed 
in note 10 to the Company financial statements.
3. Equity and debt investments
2024
£m
2023
£m
At 1 January 
3.5
3.5
Fair value gains in the year
–
–
Disposals in the year
–
–
At 31 December 
3.5
3.5
Details of the Company’s associated undertakings and significant holdings as at 
31 December 2024 are disclosed in note 11 to the Company financial statements.
4. Limited liability partnership interests
2024
£m
2023
£m
At 1 January 
2.9
2.7
Fair value (loss)/gain during the year
(0.6)
0.2
At 31 December
2.3
2.9
Other investments relate to the Group’s 17.7% partnership interest in Technikos LLP, see 
notes 1 and 14 of the Group accounts for further details.
5. Loans to subsidiary undertakings
2024
£m
2023
£m
At 1 January
641.8
599.0
(Repayment)/drawdown of loans by subsidiary 
undertakings during the year
(36.1)
42.8
At 31 December
605.7
641.8
2024
£m
2023
£m
Current
0.9
0.9 
Non-current
605.0
640.9 
At 31 December 
605.9
641.8
The Directors consider the carrying amount of trade and other receivables at 
amortised cost to approximate their fair value. All receivables are interest free, 
repayable on demand and unsecured.
The amounts due from subsidiary undertakings are interest free, repayable on 
demand and unsecured. Loans classified as non-current are not expected to be 
recalled within one year.
Given the nature of the subsidiary undertakings to which they relate, the Company 
considers expected credit losses on the Company’s receivables to be less than £0.1m 
and therefore not disclosed further (2023: under £0.1m).
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
163
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

6. Share capital and reserves
Share 
capital 
£m
 
Share 
premium 
£m
Capital 
redemption 
reserve 
£m
Profit and 
loss reserve 
£m
At 1 January 2024
21.3 
102.8
– 
734.0
Comprehensive income
–
–
–
(5.9)
Purchase of treasury shares
(1.8)
–
1.8
(29.6)
Equity-settled share-based 
payments
–
–
–
1.9
Other movements
–
(0.3)
–
0.3
Ordinary dividends
–
–
–
–
At 31 December 2024
19.5
102.5
1.8
700.7
Details of the Company’s authorised share capital and changes in its issued share 
capital can be found in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. Details of the 
movement in the share premium account can be found in the consolidated statement of 
changes in equity.
7. Profit and loss account
As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company’s profit and loss 
account has not been included in these financial statements. The Company’s loss for 
the year was £5.9m (2023: loss of £5.8m).
Details of the auditor’s remuneration are disclosed in note 6 to the consolidated 
financial statements.
Amounts receivable by the Company’s auditor and its associates in respect of services 
to the Company and its associates, other than the audit of the Company’s financial 
statements, have not been disclosed as the information is required instead to be 
disclosed on a consolidated basis in the consolidated financial statements.
8. Directors’ emoluments, employee information and 
share-based payments
The remuneration of the Directors is borne by Group subsidiary undertakings. Full 
details of their remuneration can be found in the sections labelled as audited within 
the Directors’ Remuneration Report and note 21 of the Group accounts.
The Company had no employees during 2024 or 2023.
9. Dividends and share buyback
There were no dividends paid in 2024 (2023: £13.0m dividends; £13.0m settled in 
cash). Due to the limited take up of scrip dividends the scheme was discontinued in 
prior years.
On 18 December 2023 the Group announced that, in light of the prevailing discount 
between the Company’s share price and its NAV per share, it had initiated a share 
buyback of up to £20 million. This £20m share buyback tranche completed in September 
2024. On 7th October 2024 it was announced to increase the Group’s share buyback 
programme by a further £10m to run until 31 December 2024. This increased the share 
buyback programme to a total of £30million. The Board remains committed to making 
regular cash returns to shareholders from realisations. In future these regular cash returns 
will normally be made in the form of share buybacks when the share price discount to 
NAV exceeds 20%. Regular dividend payments will be suspended under such conditions, 
including consideration of any final dividend for 2024.
10. Borrowings
2024
£m
2023
£m
Current
–
– 
Non-current
119.7
119.6
At 31 December 2024
119.7
119.6
The Group expanded its debt facilities in the prior year with the addition of an agreed 
borrowing primarily from Phoenix group which it has used to fund our portfolio of 
businesses. The terms of the facilities are summarised in note 19 of the consolidated 
financial statements.
164	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

11. Details of subsidiary undertakings
Name of subsidiary undertakings
Proportion 
of 
ownership 
interest
%(i)
Proportion 
of voting 
power held
%(i)
 Proportion 
of nominal 
value held
%
Held by 
parent/
Group
IP2IPO Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
IP2IPO Carry Partner Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Americas Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO US Partners Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Top Technology Ventures Limited(iii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
Fusion IP Sheffield Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Fusion IP Cardiff Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP Venture Fund II (GP) LLP(iii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP Ventures (Scotland) Limited(iii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Portfolio (GP) Limited(iii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Portfolio LP
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP Capital Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Asia-Pacific Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
IP Group Greater China Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP Group Greater China Services Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO ANZ Carry Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Kiko Ventures Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia Pty Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia HP Pty Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia Management Pty Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia GP Pty Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia CT Pty Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia VCMP LP
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia VCLP No 1 LP
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Australia TS Pty Ltd
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Parkwalk Advisors Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
Touchstone Innovations Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Innovations Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Innovations Limited Partner Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Company Maker Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
165
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of subsidiary undertakings
Proportion 
of 
ownership 
interest
%(i)
Proportion 
of voting 
power held
%(i)
 Proportion 
of nominal 
value held
%
Held by 
parent/
Group
Touchstone Innovations Businesses LLP
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IPG USA (LP) Limited
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IPG USA SCO LP
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
IP2IPO Nominees Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
IP2IPO Services Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
LifeUK (IP2IPO) Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
IP Industry Partners Limited(ii)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Direct
Biofusion Licensing (Sheffield) Limited(ii),(iv)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Fusion IP Nottingham Limited(ii),(iv)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Fusion IP Two Limited(ii),(iv)
100.0
100.0
100.0
Indirect
Asterion Limited
66.8
66.8
66.5
Indirect
PH Therapeutics Limited(ii)
60.0
60.0
60.0
Indirect
IP Venture Fund II LP(v)
33.3
33.3
33.3
Indirect
i	 All holdings are via ordinary shares unless separate classes are specified in the table.
ii	 Dormant/non-trading company.
iii	 Company/engaged in fund management activity.
iv	 Acquired as part of the Fusion IP plc acquisition.
v	 As detailed in note 1 to the Group financial statements, though less than 33.3% of beneficial and nominal interest is held by the Group, the Group’s position as fund manager to IP Venture Fund II LP 
means the Group fulfils the control criteria set out in IFRS 10 and the fund is thus consolidated.
All companies above have their registered offices at 2nd Floor 3 Pancras Square, Kings Cross, London, England, N1C 4AG, unless separately listed on the following page.
IP Ventures (Scotland) Limited: 50 Lothian Road, Festival Square, Edinburgh, EH3 9WJ.
Asterion Limited: Windsor House, Cornwall Road, Harrogate, England, HG1 2PW.
PH Therapeutics Limited: Windsor House, Cornwall Road, Harrogate, England, HG1 2PW.
IP2IPO Australia Pty Limited: Level 35, 360 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.	
IP Group Greater China Limited: 6/F Alexandra House, 18 Chater Road, Central Hong Kong.
IP Group Greater China Services Limited: 6/F Alexandra House, 18 Chater Road, Central Hong Kong.
IP2IPO Australia HP Pty Limited: Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
IP2IPO Australia Management Pty Limited: Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
IP2IPO Australia GP Pty Limited: Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
166	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
11. Details of subsidiary undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

IP2IPO Australia CT Pty Limited: Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
IP2IPO Australia VCMP LP: Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
IP2IPO Australia VCLP No 1 LP: Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
IP2IPO Australia TS Pty Ltd, 658 856 832, Level 16, 379 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
IPG USA SCO LP: 13 Queens Road, Aberdeen, AB15 4YL.
All companies above are incorporated in England and Wales with the exception of IP Ventures (Scotland) Limited incorporated in Scotland, IP Group Inc, IP2IPO Australia Pty 
Limited, IP2IPO Australia HP Pty Limited, IP2IPO Australia Management Pty Limited, IP2IPO Australia GP Pty Limited, IP2IPO Australia CT Pty Limited, IP2IPO Australia VCMP LP and IP2IPO 
Australia VCLP No 1 LP which were incorporated in Australia and IP Group Greater China Limited and IP Group Greater China Services Limited are both incorporated in Hong Kong.
All companies above undertake the activity of commercialising intellectual property unless stated otherwise. All companies are consolidated into the Group’s financial 
performance and position following the acquisition method.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings
Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
IPG-CEL China Ventures Limited
Level 54, Hopwell Centre, 183 Queen’s Road East, Hong Kong
50.0%
Group
Accelercomm Limited
5 Benham Road Benham Road, Chilworth, Southampton, England, SO16 7QJ
26.4%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Accelercomm Limited)
 
25.8%
Group
Ordinary A Shares (Accelercomm Limited)
 
30.9%
Group
B Preference Shares (Accelercomm Limited)
 
24.5%
Group
Additive Assurance Pty Ltd
382 Huntingdale Rd, Oakleigh South VIC 3167, Australia
32.5%
Group
Seed Extension Preference Shares (Additive Assurance)
 
32.5%
Group
Alesi Surgical Limited
Cardiff Medicentre, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ
30.5%
Group
Preferred D Shares (Alesi Surgical Limited)
 
23.4%
Group
Preferred B Shares (Alesi Surgical Limited)
 
28.1%
Group
Preferred Ordinary Shares (Alesi Surgical Limited)
 
40.3%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Alesi Surgical Limited)
 
57.0%
Group
A Shares (Alesi Surgical Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Preferred C Shares (Alesi Surgical Limited)
 
42.0%
Group
Alimetry Limited
70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
22.2%
Group
Series B Preference Shares (Alimetry Limited)
 
22.2%
Group
AMSL Innovations Pty Ltd
42 Stafford St Stanmore, NEW SOUTH WALES, 2048 Australia
35.7%
Group
Series B Shares (AMSL Innovations Pty Ltd)
 
35.7%
Group
Ankere Therapeutics Pty Ltd
Level 9, 31 Queen Street Melbourne VIC 3000
32.4%
Group
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
167
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
11. Details of subsidiary undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
Seed Shares (Ankere Therapeutics Pty Ltd)
 
54.5%
Group
AnywhereHPLC Limited
Irdb Building (Level 1) Du Cane Road Imperial College London, Hammersmith 
Campus London W12 0HS
50.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (AnywhereHPLC Limited)
 
50.0%
Group
Aqdot Limited
Lab 1 Iconix 2 Iconix Park, London Road, Cambridge, CB22 3EG
28.1%
Group
Preference Shares (Aqdot Limited)
 
37.4%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Asterion Limited)
 
66.8%
Group
Atazoa Limited
Skempton Building, Imperial College Room 205, Skempton Building, Imperial 
College, London, SW7 2AZ
24.9%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Atazoa Limited)
 
49.9%
Group
AudioScenic Limited
Suite A, Epsilon House Enterprise Road, Southampton Science Park, 
Southampton, England, SO16 7NS
34.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (AudioScenic Limited)
 
38.5%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (AudioScenic Limited)
 
33.1%
Group
B Ordinary Shares (AudioScenic Limited)
 
30.4%
Group
Autifony Therapeutics Limited
Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, 
England, SG1 2FX
24.9%
Group
A3 Preference Shares (Autifony Therapeutics Limited)
 
35.5%
Group
A Preference Shares (Autifony Therapeutics Limited)
 
38.4%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Autifony Therapeutics Limited)
 
1.5%
Group
Azuri Technologies Limited
St. John’s Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge,
42.4%
Group
Ordinary shares (Azuri Technologies Limited)
 
37.4%
Group
A Preference Shares (Azuri Technologies Limited)
 
50.2%
Group
Barocal Limited
140b Newmarket Road, Cambridge, England, CB5 8HE
32.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Barocal Limited)
 
32.0%
Group
Bramble Energy Limited
Atrium Court Tilgate Business Park Brighton Road Crawley RH11 9BP
31.6%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Bramble Energy Limited)
 
32.0%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Bramble Energy Limited)
 
32.4%
Group
Canopus Networks Pty Ltd
98 Tambourine Bay Rd, Riverview, New South Wales 2066, AU
38.0%
Group
168	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
Ordinary Shares (Canopus Networks Pty Ltd)
 
38.0%
Group
Cardian Limited
30 Broad Street Broad Street, Great Cambourne, Cambridge, England, CB23 6HJ
53.7%
Group
A Preference Shares (Cardian Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Cardian Limited)
 
13.6%
Group
Ordinary Shares 2 – Revenue shares (Cardian Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Cardiovascular Imaging Solutions Limited
Suite 19 Maple Court, Grove Park, Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, SL6 3LW
24.9%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Cardiovascular Imaging Solutions Limited)
 
24.9%
Group
C-Capture Limited
Windsor House, Cornwall Road, Harrogate, England, HG1 2PW
31.1%
Group
Ordinary Shares (C-Capture Limited)
 
22.2%
Group
Series A Preference Shares (C-Capture Limited)
 
37.0%
Group
A2 Preferred Shares (C-Capture Limited)
 
17.1%
Group
A1-B Preference Shares (C-Capture Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Chromosol Limited
3 Field Court Grays Inn London WC1R 5EF
34.6%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Chromosol Limited)
 
34.6%
Group
CyAmast Pty Ltd
South Wharf, VIC 3006, Australia
34.1%
Group
Ordinary Share (CyAmast Pty Ltd)
 
34.1%
Group
Deep Render Ltd
1 St. Katharine’s Way, London, England, E1W 1UN
45.7%
Group
Series A Preferred Shares (Deep Render Ltd)
 
60.0%
Group
Defenition Limited
Windsor House, Cornwall Road, Harrogate, England, HG1 2PW
49.5%
Group
B Ordinary Shares (Defenition Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Defenition Limited)
 
48.5%
Group
Diffblue Limited
5 New Street Square London EC4A 3TW
28.3%
Group
Series A Shares (Diffblue Limited)
 
52.6%
Group
Non-Voting Preference Shares (Diffblue Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Series A1 Shares (Diffblue Limited)
 
22.3%
Group
Electralith Pty Ltd
Level 35, 360 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000
24.1%
Group
Series A Preference Shares (Electralith Pty Ltd)
 
19.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Electralith Pty Ltd)
 
28.2%
Group
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
169
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
Emdot Limited
3 Pancras Square, King’s Cross, London, England, N1C 4AG
26.3%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Emdot Limited)
 
26.3%
Group
Enterprise Therapeutics Holdings Ltd
Sussex Innovation Centre Science Park Square, Falmer, Brighton, England, BN1 9SB
20.3%
Group
Series B Shares (Enterprise Therapeutics Holdings Ltd)
 
16.4%
Group
Series A Shares (Enterprise Therapeutics Holdings Ltd)
 
47.6%
Group
Series B1 Preferred Shares (Enterprise Therapeutics Holdings
 
15.0%
Group
Series B2 Preferred Shares (Enterprise Therapeutics Holdings
 
26.0%
Group
First Light Fusion Limited
Unit 10 Mead Road, Yarnton, Kidlington, Oxfordshire, OX5 1QU
27.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (First Light Fusion Limited)
 
28.2%
Group
Forge Photonics Pty Ltd
Suite 201, 697 Burke Road, Camberwell VIC 3124
31.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Forge Photonics Pty Ltd)
 
31.5%
Group
Gripable Limited
Thornton House, 39 Thornton Road, London, England, SW19 4NQ
36.8%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Gripable Limited)
 
37.1%
Group
Hysata Pty Ltd
AIIM Building, Innovation Campus, North Wollongong NSW 2500
46.3%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Hysata Pty Ltd)
 
63.4%
Group
Series A Preference Shares (Hysata Pty Ltd)
 
44.7%
Group
Ibex Innovations Limited
Netpark Plexus Thomas Wright Way Sedgefield Stockton-on-Tees TS21 3FD
35.9%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Ibex Innovations Limited)
 
35.9%
Group
Ieso Digital Health Limited
The Jeffreys Building, Cowley Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United 
Kingdom, CB4 0DS
20.9%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Ieso Digital Health Limited)
 
85.2%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Ieso Digital Health Limited)
 
14.7%
Group
A1 Preference Shares (Ieso Digital Health Limited)
 
47.1%
Group
B1 Preferred Shares – CLN (Ieso Digital Health Limited)
 
22.8%
Group
B1 Preferred Shares (Ieso Digital Health Limited)
 
15.0%
Group
C1 Preferred Shares – CLN (Ieso Digital Health Limited)
 
35.2%
Group
Iksuda Therapeutics Limited
The Biosphere, Draymans Way, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5BX
21.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Iksuda Therapeutics Limited)
 
22.6%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Iksuda Therapeutics Limited)
 
50.0%
Group
Series A Shares (Iksuda Therapeutics Limited)
 
29.2%
Group
170	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
Inosi Therapeutics Pty Ltd
South Wharf, VIC 3006, Australia
26.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Inosi Therapeutics Pty Ltd)
 
26.0%
Group
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc
Floor 6A, Hodge House, 114-116 St Mary Street, Cardiff, CF10 1DY
20.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc)
 
20.5%
Group
Intrinsic Semiconductor Technologies Limited
Ucl Business Plc, The Network Building, 97 Tottenham Court Road, London, United 
Kingdom, W1T 4TP
24.3%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Intrinsic Semiconductor Technologies Limited)
 
43.7%
Group
B Ordinary Shares (Intrinsic Semiconductor Technologies Limited)
 
24.1%
Group
Ionix Advanced Technologies Limited
Lynthorne House Intercity Way Leeds LS13 4LQ
28.6%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Ionix Advanced Technologies Limited)
 
28.5%
Group
B Ordinary Shares (Ionix Advanced Technologies Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
E Ordinary Shares (Ionix Advanced Technologies Limited)
 
27.8%
Group
Ipalk SAS
112 rye des hautes variennes, 45200, Amilly France
22.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Ipalk SAS)
 
22.0%
Group
Istesso Limited
2nd Floor 3 Pancras Square, Kings Cross, London, United Kingdom, N1C 4AG
27.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Istesso Limited)
 
40.6%
Group
A Shares (Istesso Limited)
 
77.8%
Group
Kira Biotech Pty Limited
The Precinct, Level 2/315 Brunswick St, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Australia
24.2%
Group
Series A Shares (Kira Biotech Pty Limited)
 
38.6%
Group
Jetra Therapeutics Pty Ltd
St Lucia QLD 4072 Australia
31.7%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Jetra Therapeutics Pty Ltd)
 
31.7%
Group
Lumai Limited
61 Derwent Avenue, Headington, Oxford, England, OX3 0AS
31.6%
Group
Series A Shares (Lumai Limited)
Lumai Limited
32.2%
 
Ordinary Shares (Lumai Limited)
 
31.2%
Group
Magnomatics Limited
Park House, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ
37.2%
Group
A Shares (Magnomatics Limited)
 
52.1%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Magnomatics Limited)
 
15.3%
Group
C Ordinary Shares (Magnomatics Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
B Shares (Magnomatics Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
171
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
Metabometrix Limited
12 Lodgefield Welwyn Garden City AL7 1SD
23.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Metabometrix Limited)
 
23.0%
Group
Mixergy Limited
30 Upper High Street, Thame, Oxfordshire, OX9 3EZ
25.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Mixergy Limited)
 
26.6%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Mixergy Limited)
 
22.0%
Group
B Ordinary Shares (CLN) (Mixergy Limited)
 
20.2%
Group
mRNAex Pty Ltd
Suite 201, 697 Burke Road Camberwell VIC 3124
25.0%
Group
Seed Preference Shares (mRNAex Pty Ltd)
 
36.4%
Group
NGenics Global Limited
School of Physics, Engineering and Technology University of York Heslington York 
YO10 5DD
29.6%
Group
Ordinary Shares (NGenics Global Limited)
 
29.6%
Group
OxCCU Tech Limited
C/O James Cowper Kreston 2 Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford, Oxfordshire, 
England, OX2 9GG
24.8%
Group
Ordinary Shares (OxCCU Tech Limited)
 
26.5%
Group
Series A Preferred Shares (OxCCU Tech Limited)
 
12.5%
Group
Oxehealth Limited
Bee House Eastern Avenue Milton Abingdon OX14 4SB
27.4%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Oxehealth Limited)
 
27.4%
Group
OxSyBio Limited
3 Field Court, London, WC1R 5EF
45.2%
Group
Ordinary Shares (OxSyBio Limited)
 
45.8%
Group
A Shares (OxSyBio Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Preference shares (OxSyBio Limited)
 
40.0%
Group
Perlemax Limited
318 Broad Lane, Kroto Innovation Centre, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, 
England, S3 7HQ
34.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Perlemax Limited)
 
34.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (PH Therapeutics Limited)
 
60.0%
Group
172	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
Resseptor Therapeutics Pty Ltd
Suite 201, 697 Burke Road, Camberwell VIC 3124
38.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Resseptor Therapeutics)
 
38.0%
Group
RFC Power Limited
Windsor House, Cornwall Road, Harrogate, England, HG1 2PW
31.9%
Group
T Ordinary Shares (RFC Power Limited)
 
100.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (RFC Power Limited)
 
28.3%
Group
Riotech Pharmaceuticals Limited
49 Arrivato Plaza, Hall Street, St Helens, United Kingdom, WA10 1GH
24.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Riotech Pharmaceuticals Limited)
 
24.0%
Group
SkyStrata, Inc.
5179 Britten Ln, Ellicott City, MD 21043, United States
28.8%
Group
Common Stock (SkyStrata, Inc.)
 
28.8%
Group
Spinetic Energy Limited
Office D Beresford House Town Quay Southampton SO14 2AQ
29.6%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Spinetic Energy Limited)
 
29.6%
Group
Sunborne Systems Limited
3 Field Court Gray’s Inn London WC1R 5EF
22.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Sunborne Systems Limited)
 
22.0%
Group
Surrey Nanosystems Limited
East Side Business Park, Beach Road, Newhaven, England, BN9 0FB
21.1%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Surrey NanoSystems Limited)
 
15.3%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Surrey NanoSystems Limited)
 
32.2%
Group
A2 Shares (Surrey Nanosystems Limited)
 
9.1%
Group
Sweetgen Limited
3 Field Court, Gray’s Inn, London, WC1R 5EF
50.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Sweetgen Limited)
 
50.0%
Group
Telectica Limited
Second Floor Kennel Club House, Gatehouse Way, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, 
United Kingdom, HP19 8DB
26.4%
Group
Seed Preferred Shares (Telectica Limited)
 
90.5%
Group
Topivert Limited
1 More London Place, London, SE1 2AF, United Kingdom
28.7%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Topivert Limited)
 
1.8%
Group
A Ordinary Shares (Topivert Limited)
 
37.8%
Group
Series B1 Preferred Shares (Topivert Limited)
 
34.0%
Group
Series B2 Preferred Shares (Topivert Limited)
 
37.1%
Group
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024	
173
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

Name of undertaking
Registered address
Proportion 
of nominal 
value held 
%(i)
Held by 
parent/
Group(ii)
TriboSim Limited
49 Station Road Tribosim Ltd, Polegate, East Sussex, England, BN26 6EA
22.5%
Group
Ordinary Shares (TriboSim Limited)
 
22.5%
Group
Ubiquigent Limited
Dundee University Incubator Dundee Technopole, James Lindsay Place, Dundee, 
DD1 5JJ
37.2%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Ubiquigent Limited)
 
37.2%
Group
Uniphy Limited
Nexus, Discovery Way, Leeds, United Kingdom, LS2 3AA
39.0%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Uniphy Limited)
 
39.1%
Group
A Shares (Uniphy Limited)
 
16.0%
Group
B Shares (Uniphy Limited)
 
4.0%
Group
Zeetta Networks Limited
11th Floor One Temple Row Birmingham B2 5LG
21.8%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Zeetta Networks Limited)
 
12.3%
Group
Preference Shares (Zeetta Networks Limited)
 
25.4%
Group
Zoompast Limited
Office 7, 35-37 Ludgate Hill, London, EC4M 7JN
31.3%
Group
Ordinary Shares (Zoompast Limited)
 
31.3%
Group
i	 All holdings are via ordinary shares unless separate classes are specified in the table.
ii	 Voting % less than 50%.
The significant influence noted above has been determined in line with IAS 28 and Schedule 4 of The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) 
Regulations 2008.
174	
IP GROUP PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2024
NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12. Details of significant holdings and associated undertakings continued
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR FINANCIALS
OUR GOVERNANCE

The production of this report supports the work of the 
Woodland Trust, the UK’s leading woodland conservation 
charity. Each tree planted will grow into a vital carbon store, 
helping to reduce environmental impact as well as creating 
natural havens for wildlife and people.
Company registration number
04204490
Registered office
2nd Floor 3 Pancras Square Kings Cross London N1C 4AG
Directors
Sir Douglas Jardine Flint
(Non-executive Chair)
Gregory Simon Smith
(Chief Executive Officer)
David Graham Baynes
(Chief Financial and Operating Officer)
Aedhmar Hynes
(Non-executive Director and Senior Independent Director)
Dr Caroline Anne Brown
(Non-executive Director)
Heejae Richard Chae
(Non-executive Director)
Anita Kidgell
(Non-executive Director)
Company Secretary
Angela Leach
Brokers
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Financial Centre 2 King Edward Street London EC1A 1HQ
Deutsche Numis
London Office 45 Gresham Street London EC2V 7BF
Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG
60 Threadneedle Street London EC2R 8HP 
Registrars
Link Group
10th Floor Central Square 29 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 4DL 
Bankers
Royal Bank of Scotland
PO Box 333 Silbury House 300 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2ZF
Solicitors
Travers Smith LLP
10 Snow Hill, City of London, London, EC1A 2AL
Independent auditor
KPMG LLP
15 Canada Square London E14 5GL
COMPANY INFORMATION.

Our family brands
IP GROUP PLC
2ND FLOOR, 3 PANCRAS SQUARE,  
KINGS CROSS, LONDON, N1C 4AG
T +44 (0)20 7444 0050 
WWW.IPGROUPPLC.COM