UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
(cid:3) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Or
(cid:4) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-37399
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Maryland
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
120 Passaic Avenue, Fairfield, New Jersey
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
30-0870244
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
07004
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (973) 244-4500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Trading Symbol(s)
KRNY
Name of each exchange on which registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. (cid:3) YES (cid:4) NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. (cid:4) YES (cid:3) NO
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (cid:3) YES (cid:4) NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
such files). (cid:3) YES (cid:4) NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or
an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging
growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
(cid:3)
(cid:4)
Emerging growth company
(cid:4)
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
(cid:4)
(cid:4)
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any
new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. (cid:4)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal
control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that
prepared or issued its audit report. (cid:3)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (cid:4) YES (cid:3) NO
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on December 31, 2020 (the last
business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $815.8 million. Solely for purposes of this calculation, shares
held by directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are treated as shares held by affiliates.
As of August 20, 2021 there were outstanding 77,004,871 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
1.
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. (Part III)
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
INDEX
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART I
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 16.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Form 10-K Summary
SIGNATURES
Page
2
31
39
39
39
39
40
42
44
56
58
58
58
58
59
59
59
60
60
61
63
i
Item 1. Business
Forward-Looking Statements
PART I
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as
“estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect” and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;
statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to
significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these
forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.
We are under no duty to and do not take any obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other
expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to adversely impact the local and national economy and our business and results of
operations may continue to be adversely affected;
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected;
changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the
allowance for credit losses;
our ability to access cost-effective funding;
fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions;
demand for loans and deposits in our market area;
our ability to implement changes in our business strategies;
competition among depository and other financial institutions;
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins and yields, or reduce the fair value of financial
instruments or reduce the origination levels in our lending business, or increase the level of defaults, losses and prepayments
on loans we have made and make whether held in portfolio or sold in the secondary markets;
adverse changes in the securities markets;
changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees
and capital requirements;
changes in monetary or fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal
Reserve Board;
our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk in the current economic conditions;
our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;
our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, clients, systems and management personnel we have acquired or
may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time
frames and any goodwill charges related thereto;
changes in consumer demand, borrowing and savings habits;
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
our ability to retain key employees;
technological changes;
significant increases in our loan losses;
cyber-attacks, computer viruses and other technological risks that may breach the security of our websites or other systems to
obtain unauthorized access to confidential information and destroy data or disable our systems;
technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected;
the ability of third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;
the ability of the U.S. Government to manage federal debt limits;
changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own; and
other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and operational factors affecting our operations, pricing products and
services described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these
forward-looking statements.
General
Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company,” or “Kearny Financial”), is a Maryland corporation that is the holding company for
Kearny Bank (the “Bank” or “Kearny Bank”), a nonmember New Jersey stock savings bank. The Bank converted its charter to that of
a New Jersey savings bank on June 29, 2017 having previously been a federally chartered stock savings bank.
The Company is a unitary savings and loan holding company, regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank
(“FRB”) and conducts no significant business or operations of its own. The Bank’s deposits are federally insured by the Deposit
Insurance Fund as administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Bank is primarily regulated by the
New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (“NJDBI”) and, as a nonmember bank, the FDIC. References in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K to the Company or Kearny Financial generally refer to the Company and the Bank, unless the context indicates
otherwise. References to “we”, “us”, or “our” refer to the Bank or Company, or both, as the context indicates.
The Company’s primary business is the ownership and operation of the Bank. The Bank is principally engaged in the business
of attracting deposits from the general public in New Jersey and New York and using these deposits, together with other funds, to
originate or purchase loans for its portfolio and for sale into the secondary market. Our loan portfolio is primarily comprised of loans
collateralized by commercial and residential real estate augmented by secured and unsecured loans to businesses and consumers. We
also maintain a portfolio of investment securities, primarily comprised of U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, bank-qualified
municipal obligations, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations and subordinated debt.
We operate from our administrative headquarters in Fairfield, New Jersey and other administrative locations throughout the
state of New Jersey. As of June 30, 2021, we had 48 branch offices. The Company maintains a website at www.kearnybank.com. We
make available through that website, free of charge, copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and proxy materials as soon as is reasonably practicable after the
Company electronically files those materials with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may access
these materials by following the links under “Investor Relations” under the “Financial Information” tab at the Company’s website.
Information on the Company’s website is not and should not be considered a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3
Acquisition of MSB Financial Corp. (“MSB”)
On July 10, 2020, the Company completed its acquisition of MSB and its subsidiary, Millington Bank. In accordance with the
merger agreement, approximately $9.8 million in cash and 5,853,811 shares of Company common stock were distributed to former
MSB shareholders in exchange for their shares of MSB common stock. As a result of the merger, the Company acquired loans with
fair values totaling $530.2 million, assumed deposits with fair values totaling $460.2 million and acquired four branch offices located
in Somerset and Morris counties. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in the recognition of bargain
purchase gain of $3.1 million and a core deposit intangible of $690,000.
COVID-19 Pandemic
As the Company’s business is primarily conducted within the states of New Jersey and New York, which have each been
significantly impacted by COVID-19, the operations of the Company have been similarly impacted. We continue to monitor
developments related to COVID-19, including, but not limited to, its impact on our employees, clients, communities and results of
operations.
Employee Matters. As the COVID-19 pandemic initially unfolded, and stay-at-home orders were mandated by government
officials, many of our non-branch personnel transitioned to working remotely or in a hybrid-remote environment. Through June 30,
2021 many of our non-branch personnel have continued to work in a hybrid-remote fashion. Our information technology infrastructure
has afforded us the ability to work remotely with little interruption as we continue to service the needs of our clients. For those
essential employees who are unable to work from home, we have provided personal protective equipment and have established
procedures and guidelines to ensure a safe working environment.
Retail Branches. At the outset of the pandemic we modified our branch hours and access to ensure the safety of our employees
and clients. Where possible, branch lobbies were initially transitioned to appointment-only access, with the majority of branch
operations being conducted via our drive-up windows. As certain branches did not have drive-up capabilities or suitable alternatives,
we temporarily closed certain locations. In the months following, and in accordance with the protocols recommended by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), we have outfitted our branches with protective barriers and continued to provide our
staff with personal protective equipment. As of June 30, 2021, all of our branches were fully operational.
CARES Act, Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act (“PPP Enhancement Act”). On March 27,
2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. Among the more significant components of the CARES Act, as it pertains to the
Company, was the creation of the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), the modification of rules and regulations surrounding
troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”) and modifications to the tax code to allow for the carryback of net operating losses.
The CARES Act authorized the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to temporarily guarantee loans under a new 7(a) loan
program called the Paycheck Protection Program. As part of this program the SBA guarantees 100% of the PPP loans made to eligible
borrowers. As a qualified SBA lender, the Bank is automatically authorized to originate PPP loans. On April 16, 2020, the original
authorization of $349 billion in funding for the PPP was exhausted. On April 23, 2020, the PPP Enhancement Act was signed into law
and provided an additional $310 billion in funding for the PPP program. As of June 30, 2021 we had approximately 15 loans with total
outstanding balances of $10.2 million under the PPP.
Based on Section 4013 of the CARES Act, the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act and related regulatory guidance
promulgated by federal banking regulators, qualifying loan modifications, including short-term payment deferrals, are not considered
to be TDRs. Additional information regarding loans modified in accordance with this guidance is provided in the tables below.
2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act. The 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act was signed into law on December 27, 2020.
The $900 billion relief package includes legislation that extends certain relief provisions of the CARES Act that were set to expire on
December 31, 2020. This legislation extends this relief to the earlier of 60 days after the national emergency declared by the President
is terminated or January 1, 2022.
4
Business Strategy
In recent years we have evolved our business model from that of a traditional thrift into that of a full-service community bank.
This evolution has been accomplished by growing our commercial loans and deposits, expanding our product and service offerings,
de-novo branching and the acquisition of other financial institutions. During this time, our strategy has been largely focused on
profitably deploying capital and enhancing earnings through a variety of balance sheet growth and diversification strategies. The key
components of our business strategy are as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Maintain Robust Capital and Liquidity Levels
As demonstrated by the June 30, 2021 Tier 1 Leverage ratios of the Company and the Bank of 11.76% and 10.23%,
respectively, we currently maintain, and plan to continue to maintain, capital levels in excess of regulatory minimums and
internal capital adequacy guidelines.
In addition to our robust capital levels, we maintain significant sources of both on- and off-balance sheet liquidity and
plan to continue to do so. At June 30, 2021, our liquid assets included $67.9 million of short-term cash and equivalents
supplemented by $1.68 billion of investment securities classified as available for sale which can be readily sold or pledged
as collateral, if necessary. In addition, we had the capacity to borrow additional funds totaling $651.0 million via
unsecured lines of credit and $2.13 billion and $233.1 million, without pledging additional collateral, from the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York and Federal Reserve Bank, respectively.
Grow and Diversify Our Retail Non-Maturity Deposits
We plan to continue to focus on growing and diversifying our retail non-maturity deposit base with an emphasis on
growth in core non-maturity deposits and, in particular, non-interest bearing deposits. During fiscal 2021, excluding
acquired balances, we successfully grew core non-maturity deposits by $712.5 million and anticipate that the balance of
non-maturity deposits will continue to increase in fiscal 2022.
Grow and Diversify Our Loan Portfolio
We plan to continue focusing on growing and diversifying our loan portfolio with a particular emphasis on growth in
commercial real estate, commercial business and commercial construction loan segments. Our focus, as it relates to new
loan originations, will continue to be on high quality loans with strong sponsors and favorable credit metrics.
Leverage Our Residential Mortgage Banking Infrastructure
We plan to continue to leverage our mortgage banking infrastructure to support the origination of residential mortgage
loans for sale into the secondary market and to supplement our loan growth initiatives. We anticipate that residential
mortgage loan origination and sale activity will continue to support long-term growth in our non-interest income, while
also serving to help manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk through the sale of longer-duration, fixed-rate
loans into the secondary market.
Optimize Our Branch Network
At June 30, 2021, we had a total of 48 branches. We plan to selectively evaluate branch network expansion opportunities
while continuing to place strategic emphasis on leveraging the opportunities to increase market share and expand the
depth and breadth of client relationships within our existing branches.
We also plan to continue to evaluate and optimize the performance of our existing branch network through additional
branch consolidations, where appropriate. Such efforts will take into consideration historical branch profitability, market
demographic trajectory, geographic proximity of consolidating branches and the expected impact on the Bank’s clients
and communities served.
Improve Our Operating Efficiency
In recent years the Company’s operating efficiency has improved both organically and via economies of scale gained from
merger and acquisition activity. Exclusive of potential future acquisitions we plan to continue to improve operating
efficiency through organic means, such as the increased use of technology and the continual evaluation of branch
consolidation opportunities.
5
•
Continue Our Technology Transformation
In recognition of the ongoing evolution of our business towards digital channels we have invested significant human
resources and capital towards enhancing both our internal and client-facing technology systems. Our ongoing technology
transformation will impact nearly every area of the Company including the residential and commercial lending functions,
retail deposit gathering, risk management and back office operations. We continually strive to enhance our digital banking
services which allow us to serve our clients’ needs in an omnichannel environment.
Market Area. At June 30, 2021, our primary market area consisted of the counties in which we currently operate branches,
including Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset and Union counties in New Jersey and
Kings (Brooklyn) and Richmond (Staten Island) counties in New York. Our lending is concentrated in these markets and our
predominant sources of deposits are the communities in which our offices are located as well as the neighboring communities. Our
acquisition of Millington Bank on July 10, 2020 enabled us to enhance our New Jersey market area by newly expanding into Somerset
county while expanding upon our existing presence in Morris county.
Competition. We operate in a highly competitive market area with a large concentration of financial institutions and we face
substantial competition in attracting deposits and in originating loans. A number of our competitors are significantly larger institutions
with greater financial and technological resources and lending limits. Our ability to compete successfully is a significant factor
affecting our growth potential and profitability. Our competition for deposits and loans comes primarily from other insured depository
institutions located in our primary market area. We also face competition from out-of-market depository institutions operating via
online channels and from non-depository institutions including mortgage banks, finance companies, insurance companies and
brokerage firms.
Lending Activities
General. Our loan portfolio is comprised of multi-family loans, nonresidential real estate loans, commercial business loans,
construction loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and consumer loans. In recent
years our lending strategies have placed increasing emphasis on the origination of commercial loans.
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts and as a
percentage of the total portfolio at the dates indicated.
2021
At June 30,
2019
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
(Dollars In Thousands)
2020
2018
2017
Commercial loans:
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
Construction
One- to four-family residential
mortgage loans
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans and lines of
credit
Other consumer loans
$2,039,260 41.79 % $2,059,568 45.36 % $1,946,391 41.14 % $1,758,584 38.50 % $1,412,575 43.57 %
1,079,444 22.12
168,951 3.46
93,804 1.92
1,085,064 33.46
74,471 2.30
3,815 0.12
1,302,961 28.52
85,825 1.88
23,271 0.51
1,258,869 26.61
65,763 1.39
13,907 0.29
960,853 21.16
138,788 3.06
20,961 0.46
1,447,721 29.66
1,273,022 28.04
1,344,044 28.41
1,297,453 28.40
567,323 17.50
47,871 0.98
3,259 0.07
82,920 1.83
3,991 0.09
96,165 2.03
5,814 0.13
90,761 1.99
9,060 0.20
82,822 2.55
16,383 0.50
Total loans
4,880,310 100.00 % 4,540,103 100.00 % 4,730,953 100.00 % 4,567,915 100.00 % 3,242,453 100.00 %
Less:
Allowance for credit losses
Unaccreted (unamortized) yield
adjustments
Total adjustments
58,165
28,916
87,081
37,327
41,706
79,033
33,274
52,025
85,299
30,865
66,567
97,432
29,286
(2,808)
26,478
Total loans, net
$4,793,229
$4,461,070
$4,645,654
$4,470,483
$3,215,975
6
The following table sets forth the composition of our real estate secured loans indicating the loan-to-value (“LTV”), by loan
category, at June 30, 2021:
Commercial mortgage loans:
Multi-family mortgage loans
Nonresidential mortgage loans
Construction loans
Total commercial mortgage loans
One- to four-family residential mortgage
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans
Total real estate secured loans
Balance
June 30, 2021
(In Thousands)
$
$
2,039,260
1,079,444
93,804
3,212,508
1,447,721
47,871
4,708,100
LTV
64%
54%
61%
61%
59%
47%
60%
Loan Maturity Schedule. The following table sets forth the maturities of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2021. Demand loans,
loans having no stated maturity and overdrafts are shown as due in one year or less. Loans are stated in the following table at
contractual maturity and actual maturities could differ due to prepayments.
Amounts due:
Within one year
After one year:
1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years
5 to 10 years
10 to 15 years
Over 15 years
Total due after one year
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$
63,264 $
54,314 $
77,362 $
44,459 $
3,849 $
333 $
1,106 $ 244,687
191,516
341,456
1,248,498
90,236
104,290
159,869
148,991
506,915
65,217
144,138
1,975,996 1,025,130
26,726
25,339
32,924
2,350
4,250
91,589
14,635
23,682
37,399
1,125
-
-
2,144
3,249
122,330 12,952
175,277 15,516
10,821 1,107,948 13,677
49,345 1,443,872 47,538
456
105
432,745
543,947
43 1,923,662
348,601
5
1,544 1,386,668
2,153 4,635,623
Total amount due
$2,039,260 $ 1,079,444 $
168,951 $
93,804 $ 1,447,721 $ 47,871 $
3,259 $4,880,310
7
The following table shows the dollar amount of loans as of June 30, 2021 due after June 30, 2022 according to rate type and
loan category:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
Construction
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Other consumer loans
Fixed Rates
Floating or
Adjustable Rates
(In Thousands)
Total
$
855,553 $
411,953
48,569
7,026
1,247,938
1,120,443 $
613,177
43,020
42,319
195,934
21,460
847
26,078
1,306
1,975,996
1,025,130
91,589
49,345
1,443,872
47,538
2,153
Total loans
$
2,593,346 $
2,042,277 $
4,635,623
Multi-Family and Nonresidential Real Estate Mortgage Loans. At June 30, 2021, multi-family loans totaled $2.04 billion, or
41.8% of our loan portfolio, while nonresidential loans totaled $1.08 billion, or 22.1% of our loan portfolio. We originate commercial
mortgage loans on a variety of multi-family and nonresidential property types, including loans on mixed-use properties which
combine residential and commercial space. We originated approximately $352.5 million of multi-family and nonresidential real estate
mortgages during the year ended June 30, 2021, compared to $258.5 million during the year ended June 30, 2020. Supplementing our
organic originations were loan purchases and participations totaling $21.4 million during the year ended June 30, 2021, compared to
$55.5 million during the year ended June 30, 2020. Additionally, in conjunction with our acquisition of MSB we acquired multi-
family and nonresidential real estate mortgage loans with fair values totaling approximately $231.0 million.
We generally offer fixed-rate and adjustable-rate balloon mortgage loans on multi-family and non-residential properties with
final stated maturities ranging from five to fifteen years with amortization terms which generally range from 15 to 30 years. Our
commercial mortgage loans are primarily secured by properties located in New Jersey, New York and the surrounding states.
Commercial Business (C&I) Loans. At June 30, 2021, commercial business loans totaled $169.0 million, or 3.5% of our loan
portfolio. We originate commercial term loans and lines of credit to a variety of clients in our market area. Included within our
business loan products are loans originated through the SBA in which Kearny Bank participates as a Preferred Lender. We originated
approximately $104.6 million of commercial business loans during the year ended June 30, 2021, of which $4.0 million were
originated under the SBA PPP program. By comparison, we originated approximately $108.5 million during the year ended June 30,
2020, of which $69.7 million were originated under the SBA PPP program. Additionally, in conjunction with our acquisition of MSB
we acquired C&I loans with fair values totaling approximately $103.9 million. Our non-SBA commercial term loans generally have
terms of up to 10 years. Our commercial lines of credit have terms of up to one year and are generally floating-rate loans.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, we sold $43.6 million of PPP loans. At June 30, 2021, the balance of commercial business
loans included PPP loans totaling $10.2 million.
Supplementing our organic origination of commercial business loans was the funding of wholesale commercial business loan
participations totaling $251,000 and $2.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. During fiscal 2018 we
opted to discontinue the purchase of wholesale commercial business loan participations and thus all of the wholesale commercial
business loans funded during fiscal 2021 and 2020 were comprised of advances on previously committed lines of credit. Our
outstanding balance of wholesale commercial business loan participations totaled $11.9 million and $20.8 million at June 30, 2021
and 2020, respectively.
Construction Lending. At June 30, 2021, construction loans totaled $93.8 million, or 1.9% of our loan portfolio. Our
construction lending includes loans to individuals, builders or developers for the construction or renovation of one- to four-family
residences or for the construction of commercial real estate or multi-family residential buildings. In conjunction with our acquisition
of MSB we acquired construction loans with fair values totaling approximately $48.2 million.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, construction loan disbursements were $50.4 million compared to $7.2 million during the
year ended June 30, 2020. Construction loan disbursements, including construction loans acquired from MSB, outpaced repayments
during fiscal 2021 resulting in the reported net increase in the outstanding balance of this segment of the loan portfolio.
8
Construction borrowers must hold title to the land free and clear of any liens. Financing for construction loans is limited to 80%
of the anticipated appraised value of the completed property. Disbursements are made in accordance with inspection reports by our
approved appraisal firms. Terms of financing are generally limited to one year with an interest rate tied to the prime rate and may
include a premium of one or more points. In some cases, we convert a construction loan to a permanent mortgage loan upon
completion of construction. We have no formal limits as to the number of projects a builder has under construction or development
and make a case-by-case determination on loans to builders and developers who have multiple projects under development.
One- to Four-Family First Mortgage Loans Held in Portfolio. At June 30, 2021, one- to four-family mortgage loans totaled
$1.45 billion, or 29.7% of our loan portfolio. Our portfolio lending activities include the origination of one- to four-family first
mortgage loans, of which approximately $1.35 billion, or 93.1%, are secured by properties located within New Jersey and New York
as of June 30, 2021 with the remaining $99.5 million, or 6.9%, secured by properties in other states.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, we originated $553.2 million of one- to four-family first mortgage portfolio loans
compared to $197.8 million in the year ended June 30, 2020. To supplement portfolio loan originations, we also purchased one- to
four-family first mortgages totaling $60.1 million during the year ended June 30, 2021 compared to $15.0 million during the year
ended June 30, 2020. Additionally, in conjunction with our acquisition of MSB, we acquired one- to four-family first mortgage loans
with fair values totaling approximately $132.5 million.
The fixed-rate residential mortgage loans that we originate for portfolio generally meet the secondary mortgage market
standards of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”). In addition, we offer a first-time homebuyer program
which provides financial incentives for persons who have not previously owned real estate and are purchasing a one- to four-family
property in our primary lending area for use as a primary residence. This program is also available outside these areas, but only to
persons who are existing deposit or loan clients of Kearny Bank and/or members of their immediate families.
One- to Four-Family Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. As a complement to our residential one- to four-family portfolio lending
activities, we operate a mortgage banking platform which supports the origination of one- to four-family mortgage loans for sale into
the secondary market. The loans we originate for sale generally meet the secondary mortgage market standards of the Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation. Such loans are generally originated by, and sourced from, the same resources and markets as those loans
originated and held in our portfolio.
Our mortgage banking business strategy resulted in the recognition of $5.1 million in gains associated with the sale of $285.4
million of mortgage loans held for sale during the year ended June 30, 2021. As of that date, an additional $16.5 million of loans were
held and committed for sale into the secondary market.
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. At June 30, 2021, home equity loans and lines of credit totaled $47.9 million, or 1.0%
of our loan portfolio. Our home equity loans are fixed-rate loans for terms of generally up to 20 years. We also offer fixed-rate and
adjustable-rate home equity lines of credit with terms of up to 20 years. During the year ended June 30, 2021, we originated $15.8
million of home equity loans and home equity lines of credit compared to $16.4 million in the year ended June 30, 2020. However,
repayments of home equity loans and lines of credit generally outpaced origination volume and acquired loans during fiscal 2021,
resulting in a net decrease in the outstanding balance of this segment of the loan portfolio. Additionally, in conjunction with our
acquisition of MSB we acquired home equity loans and home equity lines of credit with fair values totaling approximately $14.1
million.
Other Consumer Loans. Our consumer loan portfolio includes unsecured overdraft lines of credit and personal loans as well as
loans secured by savings accounts and certificates of deposit on deposit with the Bank. The balance of consumer loans at June 30,
2021 primarily include $3.0 million of loans fully secured by savings accounts or certificates of deposit held by the Bank and
$262,000 of other unsecured consumer loans. We will generally lend up to 90% of the account balance on a loan secured by a savings
account or certificate of deposit.
Loans to One Borrower. New Jersey law generally limits the amount that a savings bank may lend to a single borrower and
related entities to 15% of the institution’s capital funds. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2021, our legal loans to one borrower limit was
approximately $114.3 million.
Notwithstanding regulatory limitations regarding loans to one borrower, the Bank has established a more conservative set of
internal thresholds that further limit our lending exposure to any single borrower or set of borrowers affiliated by common ownership.
9
At June 30, 2021, our largest single borrower had an aggregate outstanding loan balance of approximately $48.5 million
comprising one commercial mortgage loan and four multi-family mortgage loans. Our second largest single borrower had an
aggregate outstanding loan balance of approximately $48.2 million comprising six multi-family mortgage loans. At June 30, 2021,
these lending relationships were current and performing in accordance with the terms of their loan agreements.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Solicitation and Processing. The following table shows the principal balances of
portfolio loans originated, purchased, acquired and repaid during the periods indicated:
Loan originations: (1)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
Construction
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Other consumer loans
Total loan originations
Loan purchases:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Total loan purchases
Loans acquired from MSB (2)
Loan sales: (1)
Commercial business
Total loans sold
Loan repayments
Increase (decrease) due to other items
2021
For the Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
256,223 $
96,238
104,628
50,382
553,194
15,804
1,227
1,077,696
-
21,351
251
60,105
81,707
530,693
(44,450)
(44,450)
193,158 $
65,357
108,546
7,192
197,825
16,396
1,312
589,786
2,500
53,043
2,671
15,048
73,262
-
(470)
(470)
(1,311,576)
(1,911)
(849,249)
2,087
352,208
85,077
21,856
8,478
106,883
33,757
2,274
610,533
35,000
33,625
2,732
95,454
166,811
-
(867)
(867)
(612,622)
11,316
Net increase in loan portfolio
$
332,159 $
(184,584) $
175,171
(1)
(2)
Excludes origination and sales of one- to four-family mortgage loans held for sale.
For information on loans acquired in the MSB acquisition, see Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Additional information about the Company’s loans is presented in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Senior management recommends, and the Board of Directors approves, our lending
policies and loan approval limits. The Bank’s Loan Committee consists of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Lending Officer, Chief
Credit Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Director of Residential Lending, Director of Commercial Real Estate Lending, Director of
Commercial & Industrial (C&I) Lending and Special Assets Manager. Loans which exceed certain thresholds, as defined within our
policies, are submitted to the Bank’s Loan Committee and/or Board of Directors for approval.
10
Asset Quality
Collection Procedures on Delinquent Loans. We regularly monitor the payment status of all loans within our portfolio and
promptly initiate collection efforts on past due loans in accordance with applicable policies and procedures. Delinquent borrowers are
notified when a loan is 30 days past due. If the delinquency continues, subsequent efforts are made to contact the delinquent borrower
and additional collection notices are sent. All reasonable attempts are made to collect from borrowers prior to referral to an attorney
for collection. However, when a residential loan is 120 days delinquent and a commercial loan is 90 days delinquent, it is our general
practice to refer it to an attorney for repossession, foreclosure or other form of collection action, as appropriate. In certain instances,
we may modify the loan or grant a limited moratorium on loan payments to enable the borrower to reorganize their financial affairs as
we attempt to work with the borrower to establish a repayment schedule to cure the delinquency.
As to mortgage loans, if a foreclosure action is taken and the loan is not reinstated, paid in full or refinanced, the property is sold
at judicial sale at which we may be the buyer if there are no adequate offers to satisfy the debt. Any property acquired as the result of
foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as other real estate owned until it is sold or otherwise disposed of. When
other real estate owned is acquired, it is recorded at its fair market value less estimated selling costs. The initial write-down of the
property, if necessary, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Adjustments to the carrying value of the properties that result from
subsequent declines in value are charged to operations in the period in which the declines are identified.
Past Due Loans. A loan’s past due status is generally determined based upon its principal and interest payment (“P&I”)
delinquency status in conjunction with its past maturity status, where applicable. A loan’s P&I delinquency status is based upon the
number of calendar days between the date of the earliest P&I payment due and the as of measurement date. A loan’s past maturity
status, where applicable, is based upon the number of calendar days between a loan’s contractual maturity date and the as of
measurement date. Based upon the larger of these criteria, loans are categorized into the following past due tiers for financial
statement reporting and disclosure purposes: Current (including 1-29 days past due), 30-59 days past due, 60-89 days past due and 90
or more days past due.
The following table presents our past due loans by type and by amount as of the dates indicated:
At June 30, 2021
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
Construction
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Other consumer loans
Total
At June 30, 2020
Nonresidential
Commercial business
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Other consumer loans
Total
Past Due Loans For
30-59 Days
60-89 Days
90 Days and
Over
Total
$
$
$
$
- $
-
-
-
382
6
1
389 $
- $
-
3,211
169
-
3,380 $
(In Thousands)
- $
-
-
-
2,734
5
-
2,739 $
14,478 $
-
1,038
13
5
15,534 $
16,094 $
32,891
401
-
5,104
32
-
54,522 $
4,661
$
349
4,506
380
5
9,901 $
16,094
32,891
401
-
8,220
43
1
57,650
19,139
349
8,755
562
10
28,815
Nonaccrual Loans. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractual payments become 90 or more days past
due or when the Company does not expect to receive all P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan
agreement, regardless of past due status. Loans that become 90 days past due, but are well secured and in the process of collection,
may remain on accrual status. Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when all payments due are brought current and
we expect to receive all remaining P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Payments
received in cash on nonaccrual loans, including both the principal and interest portions of those payments, are generally applied to
reduce the carrying value of the loan.
11
Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans (“PCD”). Loans acquired in a business combination after July 1, 2020 are recorded in
accordance with ASC Topic 326, after which acquired loans are separated into two types. PCD loans are acquired loans that, as of the
acquisition date, have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. Non-PCD loans are
acquired loans that have experienced no or insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. To distinguish between the
two types of acquired loans, the Company evaluates risk characteristics that have been determined to be indicators of deteriorated
credit quality. The determining criteria may involve loan specific characteristics such as payment status, debt service coverage or other
changes in creditworthiness since the loan was originated, while others are relevant to recent economic conditions, such as borrowers
in industries impacted by the pandemic. As part of the acquisition of MSB, the Company acquired loans, for which there was, at
acquisition, evidence of more than insignificant deterioration of credit quality since origination. The Company acquired PCD loans
with a par value of $69.4 million and an allowance for credit losses of $3.9 million in its acquisition of MSB. Additional information
about the Company’s PCD loans is presented in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Nonperforming Assets. The following table provides information regarding our nonperforming assets which are comprised of
nonaccrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more past due and other real estate owned:
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
Construction
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Total nonaccrual loans (1)
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due:
Other consumer loans
Total accruing loans 90 days or more past due
Total nonperforming loans
Other real estate owned
Total nonperforming assets
Total nonperforming loans to total loans
Total nonperforming loans to total assets
Total nonperforming assets to total assets
2021
2020
At June 30,
2019
(Dollars In Thousands)
2018
2017
$
$
$
18,526
37,187
912
2,228
19,170
1,744
79,767
$
2,962
23,936
592
-
8,359
842
36,691
$
70
8,900
469
-
9,943
$
116
5,340
1,238
-
9,192
866
20,248
913
16,799
-
-
79,767
178
79,945
$
1.64%
1.10%
1.10%
5
5
36,696
178
36,874
$
0.82%
0.54%
0.55%
22
22
20,270
-
20,270
$
0.43%
0.31%
0.31%
60
60
16,859
725
17,584
$
0.37%
0.26%
0.27%
158
5,720
2,634
255
8,790
1,241
18,798
74
74
18,872
1,632
20,504
0.58%
0.39%
0.43%
(1)
TDRs on accrual status not included above totaled $6.2 million, $8.4 million, $4.3 million, $3.5 million and $2.5 million at June 30, 2021,
2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Total nonperforming assets increased by $43.0 million to $79.9 million at June 30, 2021 from $36.9 million at June 30, 2020.
For those same comparative periods, the number of nonperforming loans increased to 113 loans from 70 loans while there was one
property in other real estate owned at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively. Included in the increase in nonperforming assets
were $14.4 million of non-performing loans acquired from MSB, whose fair values at acquisition reflected various levels of
impairment. Non-performing loans at June 30, 2021 did not include $51.8 million of performing PCD loans acquired from MSB.
At June 30, 2021, 2020, and 2019, Kearny Bank had loans with aggregate outstanding balances totaling $17.8 million, $21.5
million and $15.1 million, respectively, reported as troubled debt restructurings.
Loan Review System. We maintain a loan review system consisting of several related functions including, but not limited to,
classification of assets, calculation of the allowance for credit losses, independent credit file review as well as internal audit and
lending compliance reviews. We utilize both internal and external resources, where appropriate, to perform the various loan review
functions, all of which operate in accordance with a scope and frequency determined by senior management and the Audit and
Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors.
12
As one component of our loan review system we engage a third-party firm which specializes in loan review and analysis
functions. As part of their review process, our third-party review firm compares their review results with their client base to evaluate
our risk assessment among our peers. This firm assists senior management and the Board of Directors in identifying potential credit
weaknesses; in reviewing and confirming risk ratings or adverse classifications internally ascribed to loans by management; in
identifying relevant trends that affect the collectability of the portfolio and identifying segments of the portfolio that are potential
problem areas; in verifying the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses; in evaluating the activities of lending personnel
including compliance with lending policies and the quality of their loan approval, monitoring and risk assessment; and by providing an
objective assessment of the overall quality of the loan portfolio. Currently, third-party loan reviews are being conducted quarterly and
include non-performing loans as well as samples of performing loans of varying types within our portfolio.
In addition, our loan review system includes functions performed by internal audit and compliance personnel. Internal audit
resources perform credit review functions similar to those of our third-party firm in addition to assessing the adequacy of, and
adherence to, internal credit policies, regulatory guidance to policies and procedures and loan administration procedures. Our
compliance resources monitor adherence to relevant lending-related and consumer protection-related laws and regulations.
Classification of Assets. In compliance with the regulatory guidelines, our loan review system includes an evaluation process
through which certain loans exhibiting adverse credit quality characteristics are classified as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. An asset
is classified as Substandard if it is inadequately protected by the paying capacity and net worth of the obligor or the collateral pledged,
if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will sustain some loss if the
deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as Doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard,
with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on
the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values. Assets, or portions thereof, classified as Loss are considered uncollectible
or of so little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of
risk to warrant an adverse classification but have some credit deficiencies or other potential weaknesses are designated as Special
Mention by management. Adversely classified assets, together with those rated as Special Mention are generally referred to as
Classified Assets. Non-classified assets are internally rated within one of four Pass categories or as Watch with the latter denoting a
potential deficiency or concern that warrants increased oversight or tracking by management until remediated.
Additional information about our classification of assets is presented in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
The following table discloses our designation of certain loans as special mention or adversely classified during each of the five
years presented:
Special mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total classified loans
2021
2020
At June 30,
2019
(In Thousands)
2018
2017
$
$
84,981 $
95,394
516
180,891 $
9,187 $
5,681 $
592 $
46,069
1
27,822
1
28,752
1
55,257 $
33,504 $
29,345 $
2,594
29,428
3
32,025
At June 30, 2021, 29 loans were classified as Special Mention and 152 loans were classified as Substandard. As of that same
date, 45 loans were classified as Doubtful.
Individually Evaluated Loans. On a case-by-case basis, we may conclude that a loan should be evaluated on an individual basis
based on its disparate risk characteristics. When we determine that a loan no longer shares similar risk characteristics with other loans
in the portfolio, the allowance will be determined on an individual basis using the present value of expected cash flows or, for
collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral as of the reporting date, less estimated selling costs, as applicable. If the fair
value of the collateral is less than the amortized cost basis of the loan, we will charge off the difference between the fair value of the
collateral, less costs to sell at the reporting date and the amortized cost basis of the loan.
13
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
On July 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of
Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which replaced the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology, referred
to as the “CECL” methodology. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the adoption
of Topic 326. Amounts reported prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, continue to be reported in accordance with previously
applicable GAAP.
A description of our methodology in establishing our allowance for credit losses is set forth in the section “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Allowance for Credit
Losses”.
Additional information about our allowance for credit losses is also presented in Note 6 to the audited consolidated financial
statements.
Our allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level necessary to cover lifetime expected credit losses in financial assets at
the balance sheet date. The following table sets forth information with respect to activity in the allowance for credit losses for the
periods indicated:
Allowance balance (at beginning of period)
Charge offs:
Nonresidential
Commercial business
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Other consumer loans
Total charge offs:
Recoveries:
Nonresidential
Commercial business
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans
Home equity loans and lines of credit
Other consumer loans
Total recoveries:
Net charge offs:
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses
Impact of adopting Topic 326
Initial allowance on PCD loans
Allowance balance (at end of period)
Total loans outstanding
Average loans outstanding
Allowance for credit losses as a percent of
total loans outstanding
Net loan charge-offs as a percent of
average loans outstanding
Allowance for credit losses to
non-performing loans
2021
$
37,327
$
2020
For the Years Ended June 30,
2019
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
30,865
33,274
$
2018
29,286
2017
$
24,229
(80)
(1,446)
(13)
(32)
(41)
(1,612)
-
(50)
-
-
(139)
(189)
(54)
(861)
(83)
-
(285)
(1,283)
(45)
(145)
(521)
(18)
(829)
(1,558)
(149)
(221)
(76)
(96)
(849)
(1,391)
-
17
4
-
9
30
(1,582)
(1,121)
19,640
3,901
$
58,165
$4,880,310
$4,866,436
10
2
-
-
33
45
(144)
4,197
-
-
$
37,327
$4,540,103
$4,568,816
6
47
-
-
83
136
(1,147)
3,556
-
-
$
33,274
$4,730,953
$4,669,436
-
90
172
65
104
431
(1,127)
2,706
-
-
$
30,865
$4,567,915
$3,577,598
-
727
256
16
68
1,067
(324)
5,381
-
-
$
29,286
$ 3,242,453
$ 2,955,686
1.19%
0.82%
0.70%
0.68%
0.90%
0.03%
0.00%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
72.92%
101.72%
164.15%
183.08%
155.18%
14
Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans. The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for credit
losses by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total net loans receivable at the dates indicated. The allowance for
credit losses allocated to each category is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover lifetime expected credit losses inherent
in any particular category as of the balance sheet date and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other
categories. For periods prior to 2021, the allowance for credit losses represented management’s best estimate of inherent losses that
had been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans.
2021
2020
At June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Percent
of Loans
to Total
Loans
Amount
Amount
Percent
of Loans
to Total
Loans
Percent
of Loans
to Total
Loans
Amount
(Dollars In Thousands)
Percent
of Loans
to Total
Loans
Amount
Percent
of Loans
to Total
Loans
Amount
At end of period allocated to:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family
Nonresidential
Commercial business
Construction
One- to four-family residential
mortgage loans
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans and lines of
credit
Other consumer loans
$ 28,450 48.91 % $ 20,916 56.03 % $ 16,959 50.96 % $ 14,946 48.42 % $ 13,941 43.57 %
9,672 29.07
16,243 27.93
7.41
2,467
3.59
0.41
136
2.01
9,939 33.46
2.30
1,709
0.12
35
9,787 31.71
8.27
2,552
0.84
258
8,763 23.48
5.16
1,926
0.63
236
2,086
1,170
9,747 16.76
4,860 13.02
3,377 10.15
2,479
8.03
2,384 17.50
433
36
0.74
0.06
568
58
1.52
0.16
491
172
1.48
0.52
430
413
1.39
1.34
501
777
2.55
0.50
Total
$ 58,165 100.00 % $ 37,327 100.00 % $ 33,274 100.00 % $ 30,865 100.00 % $ 29,286 100.00 %
At June 30, 2021, the allowance for credit losses totaled $58.2 million, or 1.19% of total loans, reflecting an increase of $20.9
million from $37.3 million, or 0.82% of total loans, at June 30, 2020. This increase resulted from the adoption of CECL, which
increased the ACL for loans receivable by $19.6 million, the establishment of an ACL for loans acquired from MSB totaling $9.0
million and an increase in the portion of the ACL attributable to loans individually evaluated for impairment. This increase was
partially offset by a reduction in ACL attributable to the effects of a decrease in the overall balance of the portion of the loan portfolio
that was collectively evaluated for impairment and net charge-offs.
Our loan portfolio experienced an annualized net charge-off rate of 0.03% for the year ended June 30, 2021, an increase of three
basis points from the 0.00% rate for the year ended June 30, 2020.
An overview of the balances and activity within the allowance for credit losses during the prior fiscal year ended June 30, 2020
can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2020, filed with the SEC on August 28, 2020.
The ACL at June 30, 2021 is maintained at a level that is management’s best estimate of lifetime expected credit losses inherent
in loans at the balance sheet date. The ACL is subject to estimates and assumptions that are susceptible to significant revisions as more
information becomes available and as events or conditions effecting individual borrowers and the marketplace as a whole change over
time. Additions to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary if the future economic environment deteriorates from forecasted
conditions. In addition, the banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our loan and
foreclosed real estate portfolios, related allowance for credit losses and valuation allowance for foreclosed real estate. The regulators
may require the allowance for credit losses to be increased based on their review of information available at the time of the
examination, which may negatively affect our earnings.
Additional information about the ACL at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020 is presented in Note 6 to the audited consolidated
financial statements.
15
Investment Securities
At June 30, 2021, our investment securities portfolio totaled $1.72 billion and comprised 23.5% of our total assets. By
comparison, at June 30, 2020, our securities portfolio totaled $1.42 billion and comprised 21.0% of our total assets. Additional
information about the Company’s investment securities at June 30, 2021 is presented in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial
statements.
The year-over-year net increase in the securities portfolio totaled approximately $296.7 million which largely reflected security
purchases during the year that were partially offset by repayments, sales and calls. The increase in the portfolio included a $12.5
million decrease in the fair value of the available for sale securities portfolio to an unrealized gain of $10.0 million at June 30, 2021
from an unrealized gain of $22.5 million at June 30, 2020.
Our investment policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, is designed to foster earnings and manage cash flows
within prudent interest rate risk and credit risk guidelines, taking into consideration our liquidity needs, asset/liability management
goals, and performance objectives. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer
and Treasurer/Chief Investment Officer are the senior management members of our Capital Markets Committee (“CMC”) that are
designated by the Board of Directors as the officers primarily responsible for securities portfolio management and all transactions
require the approval of at least two of these designated officers.
The investments authorized for purchase under the investment policy approved by our Board of Directors include U.S.
government and agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government agency debentures, municipal obligations, corporate bonds,
asset-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations and subordinated debt. On a short-term basis, our investment policy authorizes
investment in securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds, and certificates of deposits of insured financial
institutions.
The carrying value of our mortgage-backed securities totaled $1.06 billion at June 30, 2021 and comprised 62.0% of total
investments and 14.6% of total assets as of that date. We generally invest in mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government
agencies or government-sponsored entities. Mortgage-backed securities issued or sponsored by U.S. government agencies and
government-sponsored entities are guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest to investors.
The carrying value of our securities representing obligations of state and political subdivisions totaled $60.4 million at June 30,
2021 and comprised 3.5% of total investments and less than 1.0% of total assets as of that date. Such securities primarily included
highly-rated, fixed-rate bank-qualified securities representing general obligations of municipalities located within the U.S. or the
obligations of their related entities such as boards of education or school districts. Each of our municipal obligations were consistently
rated by Moody’s and S&P well above the thresholds that generally support our investment grade assessment with such ratings
equaling or exceeding A- or higher by S&P and/or A2 or higher by Moody’s, where rated by those agencies. In the absence of, or as a
complement to, such ratings, we rely upon our own internal analysis of the issuer’s financial condition to validate its investment grade
assessment.
The carrying value of our asset-backed securities totaled $243.0 million at June 30, 2021 and comprised 14.2% of total
investments and 3.3% of total assets as of that date. This category of securities is comprised entirely of structured, floating-rate
securities representing securitized federal education loans with 97% U.S. government guarantees. Our securities represent the highest
credit-quality tranches within the overall structures with each being rated AA+ or higher by S&P/or Aa1 or higher by Moody’s, where
rated by those agencies.
The outstanding balance of our collateralized loan obligations totaled $189.9 million at June 30, 2021 and comprised 11.1% of
total investments and 2.6% of total assets as of that date. This category of securities is comprised entirely of structured, floating-rate
securities representing securitized commercial loans to large, U.S. corporations. At June 30, 2021, each of our collateralized loan
obligations were consistently rated by Moody’s and S&P well above the thresholds that generally support our investment grade
assessment with such ratings equaling AAA by S&P and Aaa or by Moody’s, where rated by those agencies.
The carrying value of our corporate bonds totaled $158.4 million at June 30, 2021 and comprised 9.2% of total investments and
2.2% of total assets as of that date. This category of securities is comprised of two floating-rate corporate debt obligations issued by
large financial institutions and subordinated debt representing profitable, well-capitalized, small- to mid-sized community banks
located mainly in the mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. At June 30, 2021, corporate bonds issued by large financial institutions were
consistently rated by Moody’s and S&P well above the thresholds that generally support our investment grade assessment with such
ratings equaling or exceeding BBB+ or higher by S&P and/or A3 or higher by Moody’s, where rated by those agencies.
16
Current accounting standards require that securities be categorized as held to maturity, equity securities or available for sale,
based on management’s intent as to the ultimate disposition of each security. These standards allow debt securities to be classified as
held to maturity and reported in financial statements at amortized cost only if the reporting entity has the positive intent and ability to
hold these securities to maturity. Securities that might be sold in response to changes in market interest rates, changes in the security’s
prepayment risk, increases in loan demand, or other similar factors cannot be classified as held to maturity.
We do not currently use or maintain a trading account. Securities not classified as held to maturity are classified as available for
sale. These securities are reported at fair value and unrealized gains and losses on the securities are excluded from earnings and
reported, net of deferred taxes, as adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of equity. As of
June 30, 2021, our available for sale securities portfolio had a carrying value of $1.68 billion or 97.8% of our total securities with the
remaining $38.1 million or 2.2% of securities were classified as held to maturity.
Other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies, we did not hold securities of any one issuer
having an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity at June 30, 2021. All of our securities carry market risk insofar as
increases in market rates of interest may cause a decrease in their market value. We believe that unrealized losses on securities held at
June 30, 2021, are a function of changes in market interest rates and credit spreads, not changes in credit quality. Therefore, no
allowance for credit losses was recorded at that time.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale totaled $98.1 million and resulted in
gross gains of $1.2 million and gross losses of $470,000. During the year ended June 30, 2020, proceeds from sales of securities
available for sale totaled $164.3 million and resulted in gross gains of $2.4 million and gross losses of $145,000. During the year
ended June 30, 2019, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale totaled $75.4 million and resulted in gross gains of $190,000
and gross losses of $513,000. There were no sales of held to maturity securities during the year ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
17
The following table sets forth the carrying value of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated:
Debt securities available for sale:
U.S. agency securities
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Trust preferred securities
Total debt securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale:
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Residential pass-through securities
Commercial pass-through securities
Total mortgage-backed securities available for sale
2021
2020
At June 30,
2019
(In Thousands)
2018
2017
$
- $
- $
3,678 $
4,411 $
34,603
242,989
189,880
158,351
-
625,823
54,054
172,447
193,788
143,639
2,627
566,555
26,951
179,313
208,611
122,024
3,756
544,333
26,088
182,620
226,066
147,594
3,783
590,562
13,739
744,491
292,811
1,051,041
30,903
561,954
226,291
819,148
21,390
44,303
104,237
169,930
24,292
102,359
7,872
134,523
5,316
27,740
162,429
98,154
142,318
8,540
444,497
30,536
130,550
8,177
169,263
Total securities available for sale
1,676,864
1,385,703
714,263
725,085
613,760
Debt securities held to maturity:
U.S. agency securities
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Subordinated debt
Total debt securities held to maturity
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity:
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Residential pass-through securities
Commercial pass-through securities
Total mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
-
25,824
-
25,824
-
-
12,314
12,314
-
32,556
-
32,556
-
104,086
63,086
167,172
-
109,483
46,294
155,777
-
-
-
-
46,381
166,283
196,816
409,480
56,886
200,622
176,445
433,953
35,000
94,713
15,000
144,713
17,854
178,813
151,941
348,608
Total securities held to maturity
38,138
32,556
576,652
589,730
493,321
Total securities
$ 1,715,002 $ 1,418,259 $ 1,290,915 $ 1,314,815 $ 1,107,081
18
1
2
0
2
,
0
3
e
n
u
J
t
A
r
i
a
F
t
e
k
r
a
M
e
u
l
a
V
d
e
t
h
g
i
e
W
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
d
l
e
i
Y
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
C
e
u
l
a
V
d
e
t
h
g
i
e
W
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
d
l
e
i
Y
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
C
e
u
l
a
V
d
e
t
h
g
i
e
W
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
d
l
e
i
Y
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
C
e
u
l
a
V
d
e
t
h
g
i
e
W
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
d
l
e
i
Y
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
C
e
u
l
a
V
d
e
t
h
g
i
e
W
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
d
l
e
i
Y
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
C
e
u
l
a
V
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
S
l
a
t
o
T
s
r
a
e
Y
n
e
T
n
a
h
T
e
r
o
M
s
r
a
e
Y
n
e
T
o
t
e
v
i
F
s
r
a
e
Y
e
v
i
F
o
t
e
n
O
s
s
e
L
r
o
r
a
e
Y
e
n
O
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
T
n
I
s
r
a
l
l
o
D
(
e
l
b
a
t
s
i
h
T
.
1
2
0
2
,
0
3
e
n
u
J
t
a
o
i
l
o
f
t
r
o
p
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
r
u
o
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
d
n
a
s
d
l
e
i
y
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
d
e
t
h
g
i
e
w
,
s
e
u
l
a
v
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
c
e
h
t
g
n
i
d
r
a
g
e
r
n
o
i
t
a
m
r
o
f
n
i
n
i
a
t
r
e
c
h
t
r
o
f
s
t
e
s
e
l
b
a
t
g
n
i
w
o
l
l
o
f
e
h
T
e
h
t
e
v
a
h
y
a
m
s
r
e
u
s
s
i
e
s
u
a
c
e
b
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
l
a
u
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
m
o
r
f
r
e
f
f
i
d
y
a
m
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
l
a
u
t
c
A
.
s
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
e
r
p
f
o
t
c
e
f
f
e
e
h
t
r
o
g
n
i
c
i
r
p
-
e
r
t
c
e
l
f
e
r
t
o
n
s
e
o
d
d
n
a
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
l
a
u
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
s
w
o
h
s
.
r
a
e
y
e
n
o
n
i
h
t
i
w
e
l
b
a
l
l
a
c
e
r
a
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
2
.
9
3
$
f
o
e
u
l
a
v
g
n
i
y
r
r
a
c
a
h
t
i
w
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
,
1
2
0
2
,
0
3
e
n
u
J
t
A
.
s
e
i
t
l
a
n
e
p
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
e
r
p
t
u
o
h
t
i
w
r
o
h
t
i
w
s
n
o
i
t
a
g
i
l
b
o
y
a
p
e
r
p
r
o
l
l
a
c
o
t
t
h
g
i
r
1
3
6
1
6
,
9
8
9
2
4
2
,
0
8
8
9
8
1
,
1
5
3
8
5
1
,
9
3
7
3
1
,
1
9
4
4
4
7
,
3
9
3
5
0
3
,
,
4
7
4
6
1
7
1
,
$
%
$
%
6
2
2
.
1
1
1
.
1
4
1
.
1
3
4
.
7
3
2
.
0
8
1
.
2
0
2
.
5
9
1
.
7
2
4
0
6
,
9
8
9
2
4
2
,
0
8
8
9
8
1
,
1
5
3
8
5
1
,
9
3
7
3
1
,
1
9
4
4
4
7
,
5
2
1
5
0
3
,
,
2
0
0
5
1
7
1
,
$
%
-
$
%
5
1
1
.
6
5
1
.
2
7
3
.
7
4
2
.
9
7
1
.
5
9
1
.
3
7
1
.
-
6
7
9
,
4
3
9
5
0
,
0
1
7
2
7
,
6
9
1
9
1
3
,
2
1
4
3
0
,
2
3
7
9
1
0
,
8
2
2
$
%
4
3
1
,
4
1
2
,
1
$
%
5
4
.
2
2
9
.
0
8
3
.
1
5
3
.
4
-
7
8
.
2
8
9
.
1
6
5
.
2
7
6
8
,
0
2
2
6
2
,
6
4
4
0
9
,
4
5
1
2
9
2
,
8
4
1
-
8
0
5
,
9
1
8
4
,
4
1
4
1
3
,
4
9
3
$
%
-
-
-
4
5
.
1
7
6
.
1
6
2
.
2
2
2
.
2
-
-
-
0
2
4
,
1
9
4
9
,
2
5
2
6
,
2
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
%
2
2
.
2
4
1
3
,
4
3
$
%
2
7
.
1
6
4
2
,
5
$
l
a
c
i
t
i
l
o
p
d
n
a
e
t
a
t
s
f
o
s
n
o
i
t
a
g
i
l
b
O
s
n
o
i
s
i
v
i
d
b
u
s
s
n
o
i
t
a
g
i
l
b
o
n
a
o
l
d
e
z
i
l
a
r
e
t
a
l
l
o
C
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
d
e
k
c
a
b
-
t
e
s
s
A
s
d
n
o
b
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
:
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
t
b
e
D
)
1
(
s
n
o
i
t
a
g
i
l
b
o
e
g
a
g
t
r
o
m
d
e
z
i
l
a
r
e
t
a
l
l
o
C
)
1
(
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
h
g
u
o
r
h
t
-
s
s
a
p
l
a
i
t
n
e
d
i
s
e
R
)
1
(
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
h
g
u
o
r
h
t
-
s
s
a
p
l
a
i
c
r
e
m
m
o
C
:
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
d
e
k
c
a
b
-
e
g
a
g
t
r
o
M
8
0
3
,
1
0
1
$
%
2
7
.
1
6
4
2
,
5
$
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
l
a
t
o
T
.
s
e
s
i
r
p
r
e
t
n
e
d
e
r
o
s
n
o
p
s
-
t
n
e
m
n
r
e
v
o
G
)
1
(
1(cid:28)
Sources of Funds
General. Retail deposits are our primary source of funds for lending and other investment purposes. In addition, we derive funds
from principal repayments of loan and investment securities. Loan and securities payments are a relatively stable source of funds,
while deposit inflows are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions. Wholesale funding sources
including, but not limited to, borrowings from the FHLB of New York (“FHLB”), wholesale deposits and other short term-borrowings
are also used to supplement the funding for loans and investments.
Deposits. Our current deposit products include interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking accounts, money market
deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit accounts ranging in terms from 30 days to five years. Certificates of
deposit with terms ranging from six months to five years are available for individual retirement account plans. Deposit account terms,
such as interest rate earned, applicability of certain fees and service charges and funds accessibility, will vary based upon several
factors including, but not limited to, minimum balance, term to maturity, and transaction frequency and form requirements.
Deposits are obtained primarily from within New Jersey and New York through the Bank’s network of retail branches, business
relationship officers and digital banking channels. We maintain a robust suite of commercial deposit products designed to appeal to
small and mid-size businesses, non-profit organizations and government entities. Our team of experienced and dedicated business
relationship officers serve as the primary points of contact for these commercial clients and act as both new business originators and
relationship managers.
Key to our consumer deposit strategy is our “Relationship” suite of products which bundles a variety of banking services and
products together for those clients whom have a checking account with direct deposit and electronic statement delivery. Such
relationship clients are eligible for a variety of benefits, including a premium on certificates of deposit with a term of at least one year.
We also offer High Yield Checking which is primarily designed to attract core deposits in the form of clients’ primary checking
accounts through interest rate and fee reimbursement incentives to qualifying clients. The comparatively higher interest expense
associated with the High Yield Checking product in relation to our other checking products is partially offset by the transaction fee
income associated with the account.
The determination of interest rates on retail deposits is based upon a number of factors, including: (1) our need for funds based
on loan demand, current maturities of deposits and other cash flow needs; (2) a current survey of a selected group of competitors’ rates
for similar products; (3) our current cost of funds, yield on assets and asset/liability position; and (4) the alternate cost of funds on a
wholesale basis. Interest rates are reviewed by senior management on a regular basis, with deposit product and pricing updated, as
appropriate, during recurring and ad-hoc senior management meetings.
A portion of our deposits are in certificates of deposit whose balances declined to 34.2% of total deposits at June 30, 2021 from
41.5% of total deposits at June 30, 2020. Our liquidity could be reduced if a significant amount of certificates of deposit maturing
within a short period were not renewed. At June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, certificates of deposit maturing within one year were
$1.51 billion and $1.52 billion, respectively. Historically, a significant portion of the certificates of deposit remain with us after they
mature.
At June 30, 2021, $1.19 billion or 63.3% of our certificates of deposit were certificates of $100,000 or more compared to $1.01
billion or 55.2% at June 30, 2020. The general level of market interest rates and money market conditions significantly influence
deposit inflows and outflows. The effects of these factors are particularly pronounced on deposit accounts with larger balances. In
particular, certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or greater are traditionally viewed as being a more volatile source of
funding than comparatively lower balance certificates of deposit or non-maturity transaction accounts. In order to retain certificates of
deposit with balances of $100,000 or more, we may have to pay a premium rate, resulting in an increase in our cost of funds. To the
extent that such deposits do not remain with us, they may need to be replaced with wholesale funding.
Our sources of wholesale funding included brokered certificates of deposit and listing service certificates of deposit whose
balances totaled approximately $458.6 million and $20.3 million, or 8.4% and 0.4% of total deposits, respectively, at June 30, 2021.
We utilize brokered certificates of deposit and listing service certificates of deposits as alternatives to other forms of wholesale
funding, including borrowings, when interest rates and market conditions favor the use of such deposits. For a portion of our short-
term brokered certificates of deposit we utilized interest rate contracts to effectively extend their duration and to fix their cost.
20
The following table sets forth the distribution of average deposits for the periods indicated and the weighted average nominal
interest rates for each period on each category of deposits presented:
2021
Percent
of Total
Deposits
Weighted
Average
Nominal
Rate
Average
Balance
For the Years Ended June 30,
2020
Percent
of Total
Deposits
Weighted
Average
Nominal
Rate
Average
Balance
(Dollars In Thousands)
2019
Percent
of Total
Deposits
Weighted
Average
Nominal
Rate
Average
Balance
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing demand
Savings
Certificates of deposit
9.88 %
$ 518,149
1,726,190 32.92
1,066,794 20.35
1,931,887 36.85
Total average deposits
$5,243,020 100.00 %
- % $ 334,522
7.89 %
- % $ 312,169
7.68 %
- %
0.41
0.31
1.10
1,041,188 24.56
831,832 19.62
2,032,046 47.93
.
0.60 % $4,239,588 100.00 %
1.10
0.81
2.00
796,815 19.60
761,203 18.73
2,194,513 53.99
1.02
0.55
1.83
1.39 % $4,064,700 100.00 % 1.29 %
The following table sets forth certificates of deposit classified by interest rate as of the dates indicated:
Interest Rate
0.00 - 0.99%
1.00 - 1.99%
2.00 - 2.99%
3.00 - 3.99%
Total certificates of deposit
2021
At June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
$
$
1,554,774
172,892
143,849
6,231
$
326,413
822,846
663,182
27,955
66,109
604,162
1,506,221
27,965
1,877,746
$
1,840,396
$
2,204,457
The following table shows the amount of certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more by time remaining until maturity as of the
dates indicated:
CDs over 100,000:
Maturity Period
Within three months
Three through six months
Six through twelve months
Over twelve months
Total certificates of deposit
2021
At June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
$
$
700,290
154,934
152,971
181,032
$
278,157
262,561
307,769
166,508
300,464
363,801
243,061
410,220
1,189,227
$
1,014,995
$
1,317,546
21
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of certificates of deposit at June 30, 2021:
Within
One Year
Over One
Year to
Two Years
Over Two
Years to
Three
Years
At June 30, 2021
Over
Three
Years to
Four Years
(In Thousands)
Over Four
Years to
Five Years
Over Five
Years
Total
$ 1,340,625 $
123,483
46,653
-
162,225 $
19,598
64,931
-
14,306 $
10,960
15,419
545
7,933 $
17,641
16,339
-
29,489 $
986
315
-
196 $ 1,554,774
172,892
224
143,849
192
6,231
5,686
Interest Rate
0.00 - 0.99%
1.00 - 1.99%
2.00 - 2.99%
3.00 - 3.99%
Total certificates of deposit
$ 1,510,761 $
246,754 $
41,230 $
41,913 $
30,790 $
6,298 $ 1,877,746
Additional information about the Company’s deposits is presented in Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Borrowings. The sources of wholesale funding we utilize include borrowings in the form of advances from the FHLB as well as
other forms of borrowings. We generally use wholesale funding to manage our exposure to interest rate risk and liquidity risk in
conjunction with our overall asset/liability management process.
Advances from the FHLB are typically secured by our FHLB capital stock and certain investment securities as well as
residential and commercial mortgage loans that we choose to utilize as collateral for such borrowings. Additional information about
the Company’s FHLB advances is included under Note 11 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Short-term FHLB advances generally have original maturities of less than one year. At June 30, 2021, we had a total $390.0
million of short-term FHLB advances at a weighted average interest rate of 0.33%. Such advances represented 90-day FHLB term
advances that are generally forecasted to be periodically redrawn at maturity for the same term as the original advance. Based on this
presumption, we utilized interest rate contracts to effectively extend the duration of each of these advances at the time they were
drawn to effectively fix their cost.
Long-term advances generally include term advances with original maturities of greater than one year. At June 30, 2021, our
outstanding balance of long-term FHLB advances totaled $277.5 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.87%. Such advances
included $145.0 million of callable advances at a weighted average interest rate of 3.04% and $132.5 million non-callable, term
advances at a weighted average interest rate of 2.68%.
Our FHLB advances mature as follows:
By remaining period to maturity:
Less than one year
One to two years
Two to three years
Three to four years
Four to five years
Greater than five years
Total advances
Fair value adjustments
Total advances, net of
fair value adjustments
2021
At June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
390,000
145,000
22,500
103,500
6,500
-
667,500
(1,624)
$
865,000
27,000
145,000
22,500
103,500
6,500
1,169,500
(2,071)
873,400
64,046
62,700
155,000
22,500
110,000
1,287,646
(4,435)
665,876
$
1,167,429
$
1,283,211
$
$
22
Based upon the market value of investment securities and mortgage loans that are posted as collateral for FHLB advances at
June 30, 2021, we are eligible to borrow up to an additional $2.13 billion of advances from the FHLB as of that date. We are further
authorized to post additional collateral in the form of other unencumbered investments securities and eligible mortgage loans that may
expand our borrowing capacity with the FHLB up to 30% of our total assets. Additional borrowing capacity up to 50% of our total
assets may be authorized with the approval of the FHLB’s Board of Directors or Executive Committee.
In addition, the Company had the capacity to borrow additional funds totaling $651.0 million via unsecured lines of credit and
$233.1 million from the Federal Reserve Bank without pledging additional collateral. The balance of borrowings at June 30, 2021 also
included other overnight borrowings totaling $20.0 million.
Interest Rate Derivatives and Hedging
We utilize derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swaps and caps to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk in
conjunction with our overall asset/liability management process. In accordance with accounting requirements, we formally designate
all of our hedging relationships as either fair value hedges, or cash flow hedges, and documents the strategy for undertaking the hedge
transactions and its method of assessing ongoing effectiveness.
At June 30, 2021, our derivative instruments were comprised of interest rate swaps and caps with a total notional amount of
$1.04 billion. These instruments are intended to manage the interest rate exposure relating to certain wholesale funding positions that
were outstanding at June 30, 2021.
Additional information regarding our use of interest rate derivatives and our hedging activities is presented in Note 1 and Note
12 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Subsidiary Activity
At June 30, 2021, Kearny Bank was the only wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Kearny Financial Corp. As of that date,
Kearny Bank had one wholly-owned subsidiary, CJB Investment Corp. CJB Investment Corp. is a New Jersey Investment Company
and remained active through the three-year period ended June 30, 2021.
Human Capital Resources
Kearny Bank serves as a true financial partner to both consumers and businesses by subscribing to the belief that people,
performance and relationships are what matter most. We serve our clients and shareholders through our deep-rooted principles of
ethics and integrity, and by giving back to the communities in which we serve. Our workforce reflects and is inclusive of the full array
of cultures and ethnicities.
Employee Profile. We strive to create a diverse and inclusive culture reflective of our clients and the communities where we
live and work. As of June 30, 2021, we employed 584 employees, approximately 65% of whom are female. We utilize an online
recruitment platform that provides a vehicle to attract a diverse pool of candidates and have established a partnership with a diversity
recruitment solution to enhance this effort.
Talent Development and Employee Engagement. We invest in the success and development of our employees, celebrating
career milestones and longevity. Our average length of tenure is eight years as we promote from within to leverage employees’
knowledge of the organization as we continue to grow. We offer many learning and development initiatives, including departmental
budgets for certifications and professional development, as well as a robust tuition reimbursement program. In a further effort to
provide employees the opportunity to learn new skill sets, gain insights and receive advice from senior leaders, we recently launched a
Career Mentoring Program. We also developed a Senior Women’s Leadership Group, which provides a forum for our female
employees to exchange ideas and support initiatives.
Employee Benefits. We offer our employees competitive pay and incentive programs, together with a comprehensive benefits
package designed to enhance the employee experience. Such benefits include medical, dental, vision and long term disability benefits,
AD&D and group life insurance, AFLAC, Health Advocacy and Employee Assistance programs, generous paid time off and the
ability to participate in charitable events during work time. In addition, our employees share in our financial success while preparing
for their retirement via participation in our 401(k) Plan, which includes a competitive company match, and our Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), which is 100% funded by the Company.
23
Safety, Health and Wellness. We are committed to the safety and wellness of all of our employees and their families. We
provide access to a variety of health and welfare programs, including benefits that support their physical, mental and financial health.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, we regularly communicated with our employees and took many steps to protect them in accordance
with applicable guidance. Our incident response team developed a “work from home” plan for our corporate and regional offices,
while we continued to support our front-line employees. Our facilities team installed barriers where appropriate, provided personal
protective equipment and cleaning supplies, and implemented temperature screenings, physical distancing procedures and enhanced
cleaning in all locations. Branches were either closed or operated in drive-up mode only, as appropriate. We encourage those who are
sick to stay home, and encourage employees to become vaccinated by rewarding them with paid time off and eligibility to participate
in raffles.
Supervision and Regulation
Kearny Bank and Kearny Financial operate in a highly regulated industry. This regulation establishes a comprehensive
framework of activities in which a savings and loan holding company and New Jersey savings bank may engage and is intended
primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and depositors. Set forth below is a brief description of certain laws that
relate to the regulation of Kearny Bank and Kearny Financial. The description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations.
Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the
imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution and its holding company, the classification of assets by the institution and
the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of
regulatory policy, regulations, or legislation, including changes in the regulations governing savings and loan holding companies,
could have a material adverse impact on Kearny Financial, Kearny Bank and their operations. The adoption of regulations or the
enactment of laws that restrict the operations of Kearny Bank and/or Kearny Financial or impose burdensome requirements upon one
or both of them could reduce their profitability and could impair the value of Kearny Bank’s franchise, resulting in negative effects on
the trading price of our common stock.
Regulation of Kearny Bank
Kearny Bank was formerly a federal savings bank. On June 29, 2017, it converted its charter to that of a nonmember New
Jersey savings bank.
General. As a nonmember New Jersey savings bank with federally insured deposits, Kearny Bank is subject to extensive
regulation by the NJDBI and the FDIC. The regulatory structure gives the agencies authority’s widespread discretion in connection
with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies regarding the classification of assets and
the level of the allowance for loan losses. The activities of New Jersey savings banks are subject to extensive regulation including
restrictions or requirements with respect to loans to one borrower, dividends, permissible investments and lending activities, liquidity,
transactions with affiliates and community reinvestment. Both state and federal law regulate a savings bank’s relationship with its
depositors and borrowers, especially in such matters as the ownership of savings accounts and the form and content of Kearny Bank’s
mortgage documents.
Kearny Bank must file reports with the NJDBI and FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition and obtain regulatory
approvals prior to entering into certain transactions such as establishing new branches and mergers with or acquisitions of other
depository institutions. The NJDBI and FDIC regularly examine Kearny Bank and prepare reports to Kearny Bank’s Board of
Directors on any deficiencies found in its operations. The agencies have substantial discretion to take enforcement action with respect
to an institution that fails to comply with applicable regulatory requirements or engages in violations of law or unsafe and unsound
practices. Such actions can include, among others, the issuance of a cease and desist order, assessment of civil money penalties,
removal of officers and directors and the appointment of a receiver or conservator.
Activities and Powers. Kearny Bank derives its lending, investment and other powers primarily from the applicable provisions
of the New Jersey Banking Act and the related regulations. Under these laws and regulations, New Jersey savings banks, including
Kearny Bank, generally may invest in real estate mortgages; consumer and commercial loans; specific types of debt securities,
including certain corporate debt securities and obligations of federal, state and local governments and agencies; certain types of
corporate equity securities and other specified assets.
24
A savings bank may also invest pursuant to a leeway power that permits investments not otherwise permitted by the New Jersey
Banking Act. Leeway investments must comply with a number of limitations on individual and aggregate amounts of investments.
New Jersey savings banks may also exercise those powers, rights, benefits or privileges authorized for national banks, federal savings
banks or federal savings associations, or either directly or through a subsidiary. New Jersey savings banks may exercise powers,
rights, benefits and privileges of out-of-state banks, savings banks and savings associations, or either directly or through a subsidiary,
provided that prior approval by the NJDBI is required before exercising any such power, right, benefit or privilege. The exercise of
these lending, investment and activity powers is further limited by federal law and the related regulations. See “—Activity Restrictions
on State-Chartered Banks” below.
Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks. Federal law and FDIC regulations generally limit the activities as principal and
equity investments of state-chartered FDIC insured banks and their subsidiaries to those permissible for national banks and their
subsidiaries, except such activities and investments that are specifically exempted by law or regulation, or approved by the FDIC.
Before engaging as principal in a new activity that is not permissible for a national bank, or otherwise permissible under federal
law or FDIC regulations, an insured bank must seek approval from the FDIC, subject to certain specified exceptions. The FDIC will
not approve the activity unless the bank meets its minimum capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity does not
present a significant risk to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund. Certain activities of subsidiaries that are engaged in activities
permitted for national banks only through a financial subsidiary are subject to additional requirements.
Federal Deposit Insurance. Kearny Bank’s deposits are insured to applicable limits by the FDIC. The general maximum
deposit insurance amount is $250,000 per depositor.
The FDIC assesses insured depository institutions to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. Under the FDIC’s risk-based
assessment system, institutions deemed less risky pay lower assessments. Assessments for institutions of less than $10 billion of
assets, such as Kearny Bank, are based on financial measures and supervisory ratings derived from statistical modeling estimating the
probability of failure of an institution’s failure within three years. That system, effective July 1, 2016, replaced the previous system
under which institutions were placed into risk categories.
Federal legislation required the FDIC to revise its procedures to base assessments upon each insured institution’s total assets less
tangible equity instead of deposits. The FDIC finalized a rule, effective April 1, 2011, that set the assessment range at 2.5 to 45 basis
points of total assets less tangible equity. In conjunction with the Deposit Insurance Fund’s reserve ratio achieving 1.15%, the
assessment range was reduced for insured institutions of less than $10 billion of total assets to 1.5 basis points to 30 basis points,
effective July 1, 2016.
In June 2020, the FDIC adopted changes to its assessment system intended to mitigate the effects on the deposit insurance
assessment of an institution’s participation in certain governmental-sponsored programs designed to address economic effects arising
from the COVID-19 pandemic. Such programs include the Paycheck Protection Program and the Money Market Liquidity Facility.
Federal legislation increased the minimum target Deposit Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to
1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The FDIC is required to achieve the 1.35% ratio by September 30, 2020. The 1.35% ratio was
reached effective September 30, 2018. However, extraordinary growth in insured deposits during the first two quarters of 2020 caused
the Deposit Insurance Fund ratio to decline to 1.30% as of June 30, 2020. In September 2020, the FDIC adopted a Restoration Plan to
restore the ratio to at least 1.35% by the September 30, 2028 statutory deadline. The Restoration Plan maintained the existing
assessment rate schedule for now and is based on projected estimates of future losses and an assumed return to normal deposit
insurance growth. The FDIC has established a long-range fund ratio of 2.0%.
The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. Any significant increases would have an adverse effect on the
operating expenses and results of operations of Kearny Bank. Management cannot predict what assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound
practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not currently know of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of our
deposit insurance.
25
Regulatory Capital Requirements. FDIC regulations require nonmember banks to meet several minimum capital standards: a
common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to
risk-based assets of 8%, and a 4% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio. The present capital requirements were effective January
1, 2015 and represent increased standards over the previous requirements. The current requirements implement recommendations of
the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of federal law.
For purposes of the regulatory capital standards, common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’
equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier
1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2
capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include
cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and
subordinated debt.
Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets
and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, up
to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Calculation of all
types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, all assets, including
certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent
in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk
weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten
first lien one- to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight
of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to equity interests depending on
certain specified factors.
In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain
discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a capital conservation buffer consisting of 2.5% of
common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital
requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement was phased in beginning January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets
and increasing each year until fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019.
In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration, not only these numeric factors, but also
qualitative factors. The FDIC has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual institutions where deemed
necessary.
Regulations issued by the NJDBI establish generally similar regulatory capital standards for New Jersey-chartered savings
banks such as Kearny Bank.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law requires that federal bank regulatory authorities take prompt corrective
action with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital
categories: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically
undercapitalized.”
The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation. The regulations were amended to
incorporate the previously mentioned increased regulatory capital standards that were effective January 1, 2015. An institution is
deemed to be well capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or
greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or greater. An institution is adequately
capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a leverage
ratio of 4.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% or greater.
26
An institution is undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of
less than 6.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 4.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%. An institution is categorized as
significantly undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than
4.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 3.0%. Critically undercapitalized status is
triggered if an institution has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.
Qualifying banks that elect and comply with the community bank leverage ratio (as established by the regulatory agencies) are
considered well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations.
Undercapitalized banks must adhere to growth, capital distribution (including dividend) and other limitations and are required to
submit a capital restoration plan. A bank’s compliance with such a plan must be guaranteed by any company that controls the
undercapitalized institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s total assets when deemed undercapitalized or the
amount necessary to achieve the status adequately capitalized status. If an undercapitalized bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it
is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized. Significantly undercapitalized banks must comply with one or more of a number of
additional measures including, but not limited to, a required sale of sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, a
requirement to reduce total assets, cessation of taking deposits from correspondent banks, the dismissal of directors or officers and
restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, compensation of executive officers and capital distributions by the parent holding
company. Critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional measures including, subject to a narrow exception, the
appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after such status is triggered. These actions are in addition to other
discretionary supervisory or enforcement actions that the FDIC may take.
Dividend Limitations. Federal regulations impose various restrictions or requirements on Kearny Bank to pay dividends to
Kearny Financial. An institution that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as Kearny Bank, must file notice
with the Federal Reserve Board at least thirty days before paying a dividend. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove a notice if:
(i) the savings institution would be undercapitalized following the capital distribution; (ii) the proposed capital distribution raises
safety and soundness concerns; or (iii) the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute, regulation,
enforcement action or agreement or condition imposed in connection with an application.
New Jersey law specifies that no dividend may be paid if the dividend would impair the capital stock of the savings bank. In
addition, no dividend may be paid unless the savings bank would, after payment of the dividend, have a surplus of at least 50% of its
capital stock (or if the payment of dividend would not reduce surplus).
Transactions with Related Parties. Transactions between a depository institution (and, generally, its subsidiaries) and its related
parties or affiliates are limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of an institution is any company or
entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the institution. In a holding company context, the parent holding
company and any companies that are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the institution. Generally, Section
23A of the Federal Reserve Act limits the extent to which the institution or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with
any one affiliate to 10% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all
affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus. The term “covered transaction” includes an
extension of credit, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit and similar transactions. In addition, loans or other
extensions of credit by the institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with specified requirements.
The law also requires that affiliate transactions generally be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same as, or at least
as favorable to the institution as, those provided to non-affiliates.
Kearny Bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders, as well as to entities
controlled by such persons, is governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O
of the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, subject to certain exceptions, these provisions generally require that extensions of
credit to insiders:
•
•
be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent
than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal
risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and
not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which
limits are based, in part, on the amount of Kearny Bank’s regulatory capital.
In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by Kearny Bank’s Board of Directors. Extensions
of credit to executive officers are subject to additional limits based on the type of extension involved.
27
Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”), every insured depository institution,
including Kearny Bank, has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit
needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending
requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and
services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA requires the FDIC to assess the depository institution’s
record of meeting the credit needs of its community and consider that record in its consideration of certain applications by the
institution, such as for a merger or the establishment of a branch office. The FDIC may use an unsatisfactory CRA examination rating
as the basis for denying such an application. Kearny Bank received a satisfactory CRA rating from the FDIC in its most recent CRA
evaluation.
In July 2021, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced plans to jointly
work to “strengthen and modernize” the CRA regulations and the related regulatory framework. No timetable for a rulemaking
process was announced.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. Kearny Bank is a member of the FHLB of New York, which is one of eleven regional
Federal Home Loan Banks. Each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. It is funded
primarily from funds deposited by financial institutions and proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB
System. It makes loans to members pursuant to policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors of the FHLB.
As a member, Kearny Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB of New York in specified amounts. The
FHLB imposes various limitations on advances such as limiting the amount of certain types of real estate related collateral and
limiting total advances to a member.
The FHLB of New York may pay periodic dividends to members. These dividends are affected by factors such as the FHLB’s
operating results and statutory responsibilities that may be imposed such as providing certain funding for affordable housing and
interest subsidies on advances targeted for low- and moderate-income housing projects. The payment dividends, or any particular
amount of dividend, cannot be assumed.
Other Laws and Regulations
Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Kearny Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws
concerning interest rates. Kearny Bank’s operations are also subject to federal laws (and their implementing regulations) applicable to
credit transactions, such as the:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one- to four-family residential real
estate receive various disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow account
practices, and prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of settlement services;
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public
officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the
community it serves;
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in
extending credit;
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and
Truth in Savings Act, prescribing disclosure and advertising requirements with respect to deposit accounts.
The operations of Kearny Bank also are subject to the:
•
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and
prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;
28
•
•
•
•
Electronic Funds Transfer Act, and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, governing automatic deposits to and
withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines
and other electronic banking services;
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives substitute checks, such as digital check
images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;
USA PATRIOT Act, which requires institutions operating to, among other things, establish broadened anti-money
laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money
laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements, also
applicable to financial institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations; and
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial
institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions
offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy
policy and provide such customers the opportunity to opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial information with
unaffiliated third parties.
Regulation of Kearny Financial
General. Kearny Financial is a savings and loan holding company within the meaning of federal law. Kearny Financial
maintained its savings and loan holding company status (rather than becoming a bank holding company), notwithstanding the June
2017 conversion of Kearny Bank to a New Jersey savings bank charter, through Kearny Bank exercising an election available to it
under federal law. Kearny Financial is required to file reports with, and is subject to regulation and examination by, the Federal
Reserve Board. Kearny Financial must also obtain regulatory approval from the Federal Reserve Board before engaging in certain
transactions, such as mergers with or acquisitions of other depository institutions.
In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over Kearny Financial and any non-depository subsidiaries.
That permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to pose a serious risk to Kearny Bank. This
regulatory structure is intended primarily for protection of Kearny Bank’s depositors and not for the benefit of stockholders of Kearny
Financial.
The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that, to the greatest extent possible taking into account any unique characteristics of
savings and loan holding companies and the requirements of federal law, its approach is to apply to savings and loan holding
companies the supervisory principles applicable to the supervision of bank holding companies. The stated objective of the Federal
Reserve Board is to ensure the savings and loan holding company and its non-depository subsidiaries are effectively supervised, can
serve as a source of strength for and do not threaten the safety and soundness of, the subsidiary depository institution.
Nonbanking Activities. As a savings and loan holding company, Kearny Financial is permitted to engage in those activities
permissible under federal law for financial holding companies (if certain criteria are met and an election is submitted) and for multiple
savings and loan holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature, including
underwriting equity securities and insurance, as well as activities that are incidental to financial activities or complementary to a
financial activity. A multiple savings and loan holding company is generally limited to activities permissible for bank holding
companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act and certain additional activities authorized by federal regulations,
subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board.
Mergers and Acquisitions. Kearny Financial must generally obtain approval from the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring,
directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings institution or savings and loan holding company or
acquiring such an institution or holding company by merger, consolidation, or purchase of its assets. Federal law also prohibits a
savings and loan holding company from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those authorized for
savings and loan holding companies by federal law or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by
the FDIC. In evaluating an application for Kearny Financial to acquire control of a savings institution, the Federal Reserve Board
considers factors such as the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of Kearny Financial and the target institution, the
effect of the acquisition on the risk to the deposit insurance fund, the convenience and the needs of the community served and
competitive factors. A merger of another depository institution into Kearny Bank requires the prior approval of the NJDBI and FDIC,
based on similar considerations.
29
Consolidated Capital Requirements. Savings and loan holding companies had historically not been subjected to consolidated
regulatory capital requirements. Federal legislation, however, required the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital
requirements for bank and savings and loan holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of
components of capital, than those applicable to their subsidiary depository institutions. Instruments such as cumulative preferred stock
and trust-preferred securities, which were previously includable as Tier 1 capital (within limits) by bank holding companies, were no
longer includable as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain grandfathering. Regulations implementing the legislation were effective in
January 2015. Currently, consolidated regulatory capital requirements identical to those applicable to the subsidiary depository
institutions (including the community bank leverage ratio alternative) apply to savings and loan holding companies with $3 billion or
more of consolidated assets, including Kearny Financial.
Source of Strength Doctrine; Dividends. Federal law extended the source of strength doctrine, which has long applied to bank
holding companies, to savings and loan holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board has promulgated regulations implementing the
source of strength policy, which requires holding companies to act as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by
providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial distress. Further, the Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy
statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies that it has also applied to savings and loan holding
companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate
of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall
financial condition. Regulatory guidance provides for prior consultation with Federal Reserve supervisory staff as to dividends in
certain circumstances, such as when the dividend is not covered by earnings for the period for which it is being paid, when net income
for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or when the
prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company is inconsistent with its capital needs and overall financial condition. The
ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary depository institution becomes undercapitalized. In
addition, a subsidiary institution of a savings and loan holding company must file prior notice with the Federal Reserve Board, and
receive its non-objection, before paying a dividend to the parent savings and loan holding company. Federal Reserve Board guidance
also provides for regulatory review of certain stock redemption and repurchase proposals by holding companies. These regulatory
policies could affect the ability of Kearny Financial to pay dividends, engage in stock redemptions or repurchases or otherwise engage
in capital distributions.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. In order for Kearny Financial to be regulated by the Federal Reserve Board as a savings and loan
holding company (rather than as a bank holding company), Kearny Bank must remain a qualified thrift lender under applicable law or
satisfy the domestic building and loan association test under the Internal Revenue Code. Under the qualified thrift lender test, an
institution is generally required to maintain at least 65% of its portfolio assets (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of
total assets; (ii) intangible assets, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain qualified thrift
investments (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed and related securities) in at
least nine months out of each 12 month period.
Acquisition of Control. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board
if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire control of a savings and loan holding company. An
acquisition of control can occur upon the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a savings and loan holding company
or as otherwise defined by the Federal Reserve Board. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, the Federal Reserve Board has 60 days
from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial condition of the acquirer,
and future prospects of the proposed acquirer, the competence and integrity of the proposed acquirer and the effects of the acquisition
on competition. Any company that seeks to acquire “control” of Kearny Financial or Kearny Bank, within the meaning of the Savings
and Loan Holding Company Act, must file an application, and receive the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval under that statute.
The Company would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.
The prior approval of the NJDBI would also be necessary for the acquisition of 25% of a class of the Company’s voting stock,
or “control” as otherwise defined under New Jersey law.
30
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent in our business and the industry in which we operate. Before making
an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and all other information included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described below may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating
results. In addition to these risks and any other risks or uncertainties described in “Item 1. Business—Forward-Looking Statements”
and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” there may be additional
risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. The value or market price of our securities could decline due to
any of these identified or other risks. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical
trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
Economic and Market Area
The COVID-19 pandemic could continue to pose risks to our business, our results of operations and the future prospects of the
Company.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted certain industries and geographies in which our clients operate and could
impact their ability to repay their obligations to us. Given its ongoing and dynamic nature, it is difficult to predict the full impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on the business of the Company, its clients, employees and third-party service providers. The extent of such
impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including if the coronavirus can continue to be controlled and
abated and if and how the economy may remain open. Additionally, the responses of various governmental and nongovernmental
authorities to curtail business and consumer activities in an effort to mitigate the pandemic may have material long-term effects on the
Company and its clients which are difficult to quantify in the near-term or long-term.
As the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related adverse local and national economic consequences, the Company is
subject to the following risks, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on the business, financial condition, liquidity, and
results of operations of the Company:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
risks to the capital markets that may impact the value or performance of the Company’s investment securities
portfolio, as well as limit our access to the capital markets and wholesale funding sources;
effects on key employees, including operational or management personnel and those charged with preparing, monitoring
and evaluating the companies’ financial reporting and internal controls;
declines in demand for loans and other banking services and products, as well as a decline in the credit quality of our loan
portfolio, owing to the effects of COVID-19 in the markets served by the Company;
collateral for loans, especially commercial real estate and multi-family, may decline in value, which could cause credit
losses to increase;
the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments;
the allowance for credit losses may increase if borrowers experience financial difficulties, which will adversely affect net
income;
if the economy is unable to remain open or do so in an efficient manner, and high levels of unemployment continue for an
extended period of time, loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures may increase, resulting in increased loan
losses and reduced interest income;
in certain states in which we do business temporary bans on evictions and foreclosures have been enacted through
executive orders, some of which may continue indefinitely, resulting in our inability to take timely possession of real
estate assets collateralizing loans, which may increase our loan losses;
31
•
•
•
•
as the result of the decline in the Federal Reserve Board’s target federal funds rate to near 0%, the yield on assets may
decline to a greater extent than the decline in cost of interest-bearing liabilities, reducing net interest margin and spread
and reducing net income;
cyber security risks are increased as the result of an increase in the number of employees working remotely and an
increase in the number of our clients banking electronically;
declines in demand resulting from adverse impacts of the disease on businesses deemed to be “non-essential” by
governments in the markets served by the Company; and
increasing or protracted volatility in the price of the Company’s common stock, which may also impair our goodwill or
other intangible assets.
A natural disaster could harm our business.
Natural disasters can disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties, reduce or destroy the value of the collateral for
our loans and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition. The occurrence of a natural disaster could result in one or more of the following: (i) an increase in
loan delinquencies; (ii) an increase in problem assets and foreclosures; (iii) a decrease in the demand for our products and services; or
(iv) a decrease in the value of the collateral for loans, especially real estate, in turn reducing clients’ borrowing power, the value of
assets associated with problem loans and collateral coverage.
Acts of terrorism and other external events could impact our ability to conduct business.
Financial institutions have been, and continue to be, targets of terrorist threats aimed at compromising operating and
communication systems. Additionally, the metropolitan New York area and northern New Jersey remain central targets for potential
acts of terrorism. Such events could cause significant damage, impact the stability of our facilities and result in additional expenses,
impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, reduce the value of collateral securing repayment of our loans, and result in the
loss of revenue. While we have established and regularly test disaster recovery procedures, the occurrence of any such event could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.
Our inability to achieve profitability on new branches may negatively affect our earnings.
We have expanded our presence throughout our market area and we intend to pursue further expansion through de novo
branching or the purchase of branches from other financial institutions. The profitability of our expansion strategy will depend on
whether the income that we generate from the new branches will offset the increased expenses resulting from operating these
branches. We expect that it may take a period of time before these branches can become profitable, especially in areas in which we do
not have an established presence. During this period, the expense of operating these branches may negatively affect our net income.
We face intense competition from other financial services and financial services technology companies, and competitive
pressures could adversely affect our business or financial performance.
The Company faces intense competition in all of its markets and geographic regions. The Company expects competitive
pressures to intensify in the future, especially in light of legislative and regulatory initiatives arising out of the recent global economic
crisis, technological innovations that alter the barriers to entry, current economic and market conditions, and government monetary
and fiscal policies. Competition with financial services technology companies, or technology companies partnering with financial
services companies, may be particularly intense, due to, among other things, differing regulatory environments. Competitive pressures
may drive the Company to take actions that the Company might otherwise eschew, such as lowering the interest rates or fees on loans
or raising the interest rates on deposits in order to keep or attract high-quality clients. These pressures also may accelerate actions that
the Company might otherwise elect to defer, such as substantial investments in technology or infrastructure. The actions that the
Company takes in response to competition may adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. These consequences
could be exacerbated if the Company is not successful in introducing new products and other services, achieving market acceptance of
its products and other services, developing and maintaining a strong client base, or prudently managing expenses.
32
Asset Quality and Interest Rate
Changes in interest rates or the shape of the yield curve may adversely affect our profitability and financial condition.
We derive our income mainly from the difference or spread between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-
earning assets and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. In general, the larger the spread, the more
we earn. When market rates of interest change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities will
fluctuate. This can cause decreases in our spread and can adversely affect our income. From an interest rate risk perspective, we have
generally been liability sensitive, which indicates that liabilities re-price faster than assets.
From December 2015 to December 2018, the Federal Reserve Board’s Federal Open Market Committee increased its federal
funds rate target from a range of 0.00% - 0.25% to a range of 2.25% - 2.50%. However, beginning July 2019, the Committee began
lowering the target rate in response to a slowing economy and in March 2020 quickly lowered the target rate back to 0.00 – 0.25% in
response to the accelerating COVID-19 crisis and the Committee’s objective to inject liquidity into the banking system and stimulate
the credit markets. Such actions had the immediate effect of steepening the yield curve and then to flatten it as long-term rates fell
shortly thereafter. The Company’s cost of deposits and short-term borrowings have dropped while long-term rates on loans and
investments have also dropped, but not at the same pace. As a result of the flattening of the yield curve our net interest spread and net
interest margin are at risk of being reduced due to potential decreases in our yield on interest-earning assets which may outpace the
decreases in our cost of funds.
Interest rates also affect how much money we lend. For example, when interest rates rise, the cost of borrowing increases and
loan originations tend to decrease. In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the average life of loans and securities. For example,
a reduction in interest rates generally results in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities, as borrowers
refinance their debt in order to reduce their borrowing cost. This causes reinvestment risk, because we generally are not able to
reinvest prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates we earned on the prepaid loans or securities in a declining rate
environment.
Changes in market interest rates also impact the value of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as the
value of our derivatives portfolios. In particular, the unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and changes in the fair
value of interest rate derivatives serving as cash flows hedges are reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income
which is a component of stockholders’ equity. Consequently, declines in the fair value of these instruments resulting from changes in
market interest rates may adversely affect stockholders’ equity.
If our allowance for credit losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will decrease.
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our
borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining
the required amount of the allowance for credit losses, we evaluate loans individually and establish credit loss allowances for
specifically identified impairments. For loans not individually analyzed, we estimate losses and establish reserves based on reasonable
and supportable forecasts and adjustments for qualitative factors. If the assumptions used in our calculation methodology are incorrect,
our allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in further additions to our
allowance. Our allowance for credit losses was 1.19% of total loans at June 30, 2021 and significant additions to our allowance could
materially decrease our net income.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require us to increase our provision for
credit losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase in our allowance for credit losses or loan charge-offs as required by
these regulatory authorities might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
A significant portion of our assets consists of investment securities, which generally have lower yields than loans, and we
classify a significant portion of our investment securities as available for sale, which creates potential volatility in our equity
and may have an adverse impact on our net income.
As of June 30, 2021, our securities portfolio totaled $1.72 billion, or 23.5% of our total assets. Investment securities typically
have lower yields than loans. For the year ended June 30, 2021, the weighted average yield of our investment securities portfolio was
2.00%, as compared to 4.08% for our loan portfolio.
33
Accordingly, our net interest margin is lower than it would have been if a higher proportion of our interest-earning assets
consisted of loans. Additionally, at June 30, 2021, $1.68 billion, or 97.8% of our investment securities, are classified as available for
sale and reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income,
which affects our reported equity. Accordingly, given the significant size of the investment securities portfolio classified as available
for sale and due to possible mark-to-market adjustments of that portion of the portfolio resulting from market conditions, we may
experience greater volatility in the value of reported equity. Moreover, given that we actively manage our investment securities
portfolio classified as available for sale, we may sell securities which could result in a realized loss, thereby reducing our net income.
Our increased commercial lending exposes us to additional risk.
As part of our business strategy we intend to increase our focus on commercial lending. We have increased our commercial
lending staff and continue to seek additional commercial lenders to help grow the commercial loan portfolio. Our increased
commercial lending, however, exposes us to greater risks than one- to four-family residential lending. Unlike single-family, owner-
occupied residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from
employment and other income sources, and are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable and
realizable, the repayment of commercial loans typically is dependent on the successful operation and income stream of the borrower,
which can be significantly affected by economic conditions, and are secured, if at all, by collateral that is more difficult to value or sell
or by collateral which may depreciate in value. In addition, commercial loans generally carry larger balances to single borrowers or
related groups of borrowers than one- to four-family mortgage loans, which increases the financial impact of a borrower’s default.
The risk exposure from our increased commercial lending is also a function of the markets in which we operate. Our
commercial lending activity is generally focused on borrowers domiciled, and real estate located, within the states of New Jersey and
New York. Regional risk factors and changes to local laws and regulations, including changes to rent regulations or foreclosure laws,
may present greater risk than a more geographically diversified portfolio.
Because we intend to continue to increase our commercial business loan originations, our credit risk will increase.
Historically we have not had a significant portfolio of commercial business loans. We intend to continue to increase our
originations of commercial business loans, including C&I and SBA loans, which generally have more risk than both one- to four-
family residential and commercial mortgage loans. Since repayment of commercial business loans may depend on the successful
operation of the borrower’s business, repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the
local economy. Because we plan to continue to increase our originations of these loans, it may be necessary to increase the level of our
allowance for loan losses because of the increased risk characteristics associated with these types of loans. Any such increase to our
allowance for loan losses would adversely affect our earnings.
We have a significant concentration in commercial real estate loans. If our regulators were to curtail our commercial real
estate lending activities, our earnings, dividend paying capacity and/or ability to repurchase shares could be adversely
affected.
In 2006, the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
issued joint guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the
“Guidance”). The Guidance provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure may receive increased supervisory
scrutiny when total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by multi-family property, non-owner
occupied commercial real estate and construction loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital and the
outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months. Our
level of non-owner occupied commercial real estate equaled 405% of Bank total risk-based capital at June 30, 2021 and our
commercial real estate loan portfolio increased by 4% during the preceding 36 months.
34
Income from secondary mortgage market operations is volatile, and we may incur losses with respect to our secondary
mortgage market operations that could negatively affect our earnings.
A component of our business strategy is to sell a portion of residential mortgage loans originated into the secondary market,
earning non-interest income in the form of gains on sale. For the year ended June 30, 2021, sale gains attributable to the sale of
residential mortgage loans totaled $5.1 million or approximately 20.8% of our non-interest income. When interest rates rise, the
demand for mortgage loans tends to fall and may reduce the number of loans we can originate for sale. Weak or deteriorating
economic conditions also tend to reduce loan demand. If the residential mortgage loan demand decreases or we are unable to sell such
loans for an adequate profit, then our non-interest income will likely decline which would adversely affect our earnings.
We may be required to record impairment charges with respect to our investment securities portfolio.
We review our securities portfolio at the end of each quarter to determine whether the fair value is below the current carrying
value. When the fair value of any of our investment securities has declined below its carrying value, we are required to assess whether
we intend to sell, or it is more than likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost
basis. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, we would be required to record an impairment charge.
We elected the practical expedient of zero loss estimates for securities issued by U.S. government entities and agencies. A
possible future downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government and a decline in the perceived creditworthiness of
U.S. government-related obligations could adversely impact the value of our investment securities portfolio. We cannot predict if,
when or how any changes to the credit ratings or perceived creditworthiness of these organizations will affect economic conditions. A
downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government or the credit ratings of related institutions, agencies or instruments
would significantly exacerbate the other risks to which we are subject and any related adverse effects on the business, financial
condition and results of operations.
At June 30, 2021, we had investment securities with fair values of approximately $1.72 billion on which we had approximately
$10.1 million in gross unrealized losses and $21.6 million of gross unrealized gains. The valuation and liquidity of our securities could
be adversely impacted by reduced market liquidity, increased normal bid-asked spreads and increased uncertainty of market
participants, which could reduce the market value of our securities, including those with no apparent credit exposure. The valuation of
our securities requires judgment and as market conditions change security values may also change. Significant negative changes to
valuations could result in impairments in the value of the Corporation’s securities portfolio, which could have an adverse effect on the
Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.
Our investments in corporate and municipal debt securities, trust preferred and subordinated debt securities and
collateralized loan obligations expose us to additional credit risks.
The composition and allocation of our investment portfolio has historically emphasized U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
and U.S. agency debentures. While such assets remain a significant component of our investment portfolio at June 30, 2021, prior
enhancements to our investment policies, strategies and infrastructure have enabled us to diversify the composition and allocation of
our securities portfolio. Such diversification has included investing in corporate debt and municipal obligations, subordinated debt
securities issued by financial institutions and collateralized loan obligations. With the exception of collateralized loan obligations,
these securities are generally backed only by the credit of their issuers while investments in collateralized loan obligations generally
rely on the structural characteristics of an individual tranche within a larger investment vehicle to protect the investor from credit
losses arising from borrowers defaulting on the underlying securitized loans.
While we have invested primarily in investment grade securities, these securities are not backed by the federal government and
expose us to a greater degree of credit risk than U.S. agency securities. Any decline in the credit quality of these securities exposes us
to the risk that the market value of the securities could decrease which may require us to write down their value and could lead to a
possible default in payment.
35
Source of Funds
Our reliance on wholesale funding could adversely affect our liquidity and operating results.
Among other sources of funds, we rely on wholesale funding, including short- and long-term borrowings, brokered deposits and
non-brokered deposits acquired through listing services, to provide funds with which to make loans, purchase investment securities
and provide for other liquidity needs. On June 30, 2021, wholesale funding totaled $1.16 billion, or approximately 16.0% of total
assets.
Generally wholesale funding may not be as stable as funding acquired through traditional retail channels. In the future, this
funding may not be readily replaced as it matures, or we may have to pay a higher rate of interest to maintain it. Not being able to
maintain or replace those funds as they mature would adversely affect our liquidity. Paying higher interest rates to maintain or replace
funding would adversely affect our net interest margin and operating results.
Regulatory Matters
We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and
regulations.
The financial services industry is extensively regulated. Federal and state banking regulations are designed primarily to protect
the deposit insurance funds and consumers, not to benefit a company’s shareholders. These regulations may sometimes impose
significant limitations on operations. The significant federal and state banking regulations that affect us are described under the
heading “Item 1. Business—Regulation.” These regulations, along with the currently existing tax, accounting, securities, insurance,
and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations control the methods by which financial institutions
conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. New proposals
for legislation continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress that could further alter the regulation of the bank and non-bank financial
services industries and the manner in which companies within the industry conduct business.
In addition, federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in
which existing regulations are applied. Future changes in federal policy and at regulatory agencies may occur over time through policy
and personnel changes, which could lead to changes involving the level of oversight and focus on the financial services industry.
These changes may require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to operations
to comply and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The recent change in the Federal Administration could result in changes to tax laws and regulations.
The recent change in Administration could lead to changes in tax laws as well as changes in regulatory requirements. We are
subject to changes in tax law that could increase our effective tax rates. These law changes may be retroactive to previous periods and
as a result could negatively affect our current and future financial performance. An increase in our corporate tax rate could have an
unfavorable impact on our earnings and capital generation abilities. Similarly, the Bank’s clients could experience varying effects
from changes in tax laws and such effects, whether positive or negative, may have a corresponding impact on our business and the
economy as a whole. In addition, changes to regulatory requirements could increase our costs of regulatory compliance and may
significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing
operations, costs and profitability.
Business Issues
Our acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, subject us to various risks and may not result in all of the cost
savings and benefits anticipated, which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
We have in the past, and may in the future, seek to grow our business by acquiring other businesses. There is risk that our
acquisitions may not have the anticipated positive results, including results relating to: correctly assessing the asset quality of the
assets being acquired; the total cost and time required to complete the integration successfully; being able to profitably deploy funds
acquired in an acquisition; or the overall performance of the combined entity.
36
Acquisitions may also result in business disruptions that could cause clients to remove their accounts from us and move their
business to competing financial institutions. It is possible that the integration process related to acquisitions could result in the
disruption of our ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that could adversely affect our
ability to maintain relationships with clients and employees. The loss of key employees in connection with an acquisition could
adversely affect our ability to successfully conduct our business. Acquisition and integration efforts could divert management
attention and resources, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the
operation of the acquired branches may adversely affect our existing profitability, and we may not be able to achieve results in the
future similar to those achieved by the existing banking business or manage growth resulting from the acquisition effectively.
Changes to LIBOR may adversely impact the value of, and the return on, our loans, investment securities and derivatives
which are indexed to LIBOR.
On July 27, 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it will no longer persuade or
compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR to the LIBOR administrator after 2021. The announcement also indicates
that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. Consequently, at this time, it is not
possible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the LIBOR administrator or
whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. Similarly, it is not possible to predict
whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable benchmark for certain loans and liabilities including our subordinated
notes, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR or the effect of any such changes in views or alternatives on the
values of the loans and liabilities, whose interest rates are tied to LIBOR. ICE Benchmark Administration (“IBA”), the authorized and
regulated administrator of LIBOR recently announced it would consult on its plans for the discontinuation of LIBOR. IBA intends to
end publication of some LIBOR tenors on December 31, 2021 and the remaining LIBOR tenors in June 2023. Financial services
regulators and industry groups have collaborated to develop alternate reference rate indices or reference rates. The transition to a new
reference rate requires changes to contracts, risk and pricing models, valuation tools, systems, product design and hedging strategies.
Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates, the elimination or replacement of LIBOR, or other
reforms may adversely affect the value of, and the return on our loans, and our investment securities.
We hold certain intangible assets, including goodwill, which could become impaired in the future. If these assets are
considered to be either partially or fully impaired in the future, our earnings would decrease.
At June 30, 2021, we had approximately $214.6 million in intangible assets on our balance sheet comprising $210.9 million of
goodwill and $3.7 million of core deposit intangibles. We are required to periodically test our goodwill and identifiable intangible
assets for impairment. The impairment testing process considers a variety of factors, including the current market price of our
common stock, the estimated net present value of our assets and liabilities, and information concerning the terminal valuation of
similarly situated insured depository institutions. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting period, our earnings and
the book value of these intangible assets will be reduced by the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it will
have little or no impact on the tangible book value of our common stock or our regulatory capital levels, but recognition of such an
impairment loss could significantly restrict Kearny Bank’s ability to make dividend payments to Kearny Financial and therefore
adversely impact our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
Because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions, we face significant operational
risks.
We operate in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a high number of transactions.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons
outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and
technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements, and business continuation and disaster recovery.
Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss
also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with
applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and client attrition due to potential negative
publicity. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, we
could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action, and suffer damage to our reputation.
37
Our risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and reducing the potential for significant losses.
Our risk management framework is designed to effectively manage and mitigate risk while minimizing exposure to potential
losses. We seek to identify, measure, monitor, report and control our exposure to risk, including strategic, market, liquidity,
compliance and operational risks. While we use a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and mitigation techniques, these
techniques are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or
unknown risks. Recent economic conditions and heightened legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry,
among other developments, have increased our level of risk. Accordingly, we could suffer losses as a result of our failure to properly
anticipate and manage these risks.
We could be adversely affected by failure in our internal controls.
A failure in our internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on our earnings, but also on the perception
that clients, regulators and investors may have of us. We continue to devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to
continually strengthening our controls and ensuring compliance with complex accounting standards and banking regulations.
The inability to attract and retain key personnel could adversely affect our business.
The successful execution of our business strategy is partially dependent on our ability to attract and retain experienced and
qualified personnel. Failure to do so could adversely affect our strategy, client relationships and internal operations.
Information Security
Risks associated with system failures, service interruptions or other performance exceptions could negatively affect our
earnings.
Information technology systems are critical to our business. We use various technology systems to manage our client
relationships, general ledger, securities investments, deposits, and loans. We have established policies and procedures to prevent or
limit the effect of system failures, service interruptions or other performance exceptions, but such events may still occur or may not be
adequately addressed if they do occur. In addition, performance failures or other exceptions of our client-facing technologies could
deter clients from using our products and services.
In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to certain third-party service providers. If these service providers
encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty communicating with them, our ability to timely and accurately process and account for
transactions could be adversely affected.
The occurrence of any system failures, service interruptions or other performance exceptions could damage our reputation and
result in a loss of clients and business thereby subjecting us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to litigation and
possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Risks associated with cyber-security could negatively affect our earnings.
The financial services industry has experienced an increase in both the number and severity of reported cyber-attacks aimed at
gaining unauthorized access to bank systems as a way to misappropriate assets and sensitive information, corrupt and destroy data, or
cause operational disruptions.
We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of security breaches, but such events may still occur
or may not be adequately addressed if they do occur. Although we rely on security safeguards to secure our data, these safeguards may
not fully protect our systems from compromises or breaches.
We also rely on the integrity and security of a variety of third party processors, payment, clearing and settlement systems, as
well as the various participants involved in these systems, many of which have no direct relationship with us. Failure by these
participants or their systems to protect our clients' transaction data may put us at risk for possible losses due to fraud or operational
disruption.
38
Our clients are also the target of cyber-attacks and identity theft. Large scale identity theft could result in clients' accounts being
compromised and fraudulent activities being performed in their name. We have implemented certain safeguards against these types of
activities but they may not fully protect us from fraudulent financial losses.
The occurrence of a breach of security involving our clients' information, regardless of its origin, could damage our reputation
and result in a loss of clients and business and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, and could expose us to litigation and
possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
The Company and the Bank conduct business from their corporate headquarters at 120 Passaic Avenue in Fairfield, New Jersey
and from administrative offices located in Fairfield, Clifton, Millington and Oakhurst, New Jersey.
At June 30, 2021, the Company operated 48 branch offices located in Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris,
Ocean, Passaic, Somerset and Union counties, New Jersey and Kings and Richmond counties, New York. Twenty two of our branch
offices are leased with remaining terms between 12 months and 11 years. At June 30, 2021, our net investment in property and
equipment totaled $56.3 million.
Additional information regarding our properties as of June 30, 2021, is presented in Note 8 to the audited consolidated financial
statements.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are, from time to time, party to routine litigation, which arises in the normal course of business, such as claims to enforce
liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real
property loans and other issues incident to our business. At June 30, 2021, there were no lawsuits pending or known to be
contemplated against us that would be expected to have a material effect on operations or income.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
39
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Market Information. The Company’s common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “KRNY.”
Declarations of dividends by the Board of Directors depend on a number of factors, including investment opportunities, growth
objectives, financial condition, profitability, tax considerations, minimum capital requirements, regulatory limitations, stock market
characteristics and general economic conditions. The timing, frequency and amount of dividends are determined by the Board of
Directors.
The Company’s ability to pay dividends may also depend on the receipt of dividends from the Bank, which is subject to a
variety of limitations under federal banking regulations regarding the payment of dividends. For discussion of corporate and
regulatory limitations applicable to the payment of dividends, see “Item 1. Business-Regulation.”
As of August 20, 2021, there were 4,493 registered holders of record of the Company’s common stock, plus approximately
8,191 beneficial (street name) owners.
(b) Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. Set forth below is information regarding the Company’s stock repurchases during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
Maximum
Number of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
1,050,000 $
861,820 $
1,120,000 $
3,031,820 $
12.42
13.03
12.65
12.68
1,050,000
861,820
1,120,000
3,031,820
4,926,469
4,064,649
2,944,649
2,944,649
Period
April 1-30, 2021
May 1-31, 2021
June 1-30, 2021
Total
On March 13, 2019, the Company announced the authorization of a fourth repurchase plan for up to 9,218,324 shares or 10% of
the Company’s outstanding common stock. On March 25, 2020 the Company temporarily suspended its stock repurchase program due
to the risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
On October 19, 2020, the Company announced the resumption of its fourth stock repurchase plan and completed that plan
during the quarter ended December 31, 2020. Also on October 19, 2020, the Company announced the authorization of a fifth stock
repurchase plan totaling 4,475,523 shares, or 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The plan commenced upon the
completion of the fourth stock repurchase plan.
On January 22, 2021, the Company announced the completion of its fifth stock repurchase plan and the authorization of a sixth
stock repurchase plan to repurchase up to 4,210,520 shares, or 5%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On May 26, 2021,
the Company announced the completion of its sixth stock repurchase plan and the authorization of a seventh stock repurchase plan to
repurchase up to 4,064,649 shares, or 5%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. This plan has no expiration date.
During June 30, 2021, the Company repurchased 1,120,000 shares, or 27.6% of the shares authorized for repurchase under the
current repurchase program, at a cost of $14.2 million, or an average of $12.65 per share.
40
Stock Performance Graph. The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common
stock with the cumulative total return on the NASDAQ Composite Index and a peer group of the SNL Thrift Index, in each case
assuming an investment of $100 as of June 30, 2016. Total return assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.
Total Return Performance
Kearny Financial Corp.
Nasdaq Composite Index
SNL Thrift Index
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
e
u
l
a
V
x
e
d
n
I
0
06/30/16
06/30/17
06/30/18
06/30/19
06/30/20
06/30/21
Kearny Financial Corp.
NASDAQ Composite
SNL Thrift Index
At June 30,
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
$
100 $
100
100
119 $
128
118
109 $
159
129
111 $
171
117
70 $
217
94
106
315
138
The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The
NASDAQ Stock Market. The SNL Thrift Index includes all major exchange (NYSE, NYSE American and NASDAQ) traded thrifts in
SNL’s coverage universe. There can be no assurance that the Company’s future stock performance will be the same or similar to the
historical stock performance shown in the graph above. The Company neither makes nor endorses any predictions as to stock
performance.
41
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following financial information and other data in this section are derived from the Company’s audited consolidated
financial statements and should be read together therewith:
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and equivalents
Assets
Net loans receivable
Investment securities available for sale
Investment securities held to maturity
Goodwill
Deposits
Borrowings
Stockholders' equity
2021
2020
At June 30,
2019
(In Thousands)
2018
2017
67,855
$
7,283,735
4,793,229
1,676,864
38,138
210,895
5,485,306
685,876
1,042,944
$
180,967
6,758,175
4,461,070
1,385,703
32,556
210,895
4,430,282
1,173,165
1,084,177
$
38,935
6,634,829
4,645,654
714,263
576,652
210,895
4,147,610
1,321,982
1,127,159
$
128,864
6,579,874
4,470,483
725,085
589,730
210,895
4,073,604
1,198,646
1,268,748
$
78,237
4,818,127
3,215,975
613,760
493,321
108,591
2,929,745
806,228
1,057,181
Summary of Operations:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses
Net interest income after (reversal of) provision for
credit losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expenses
Income before taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
Per Share Data:
Net income per share - Basic and diluted
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding (in thousands):
Basic
Diluted
Cash dividends per share
Dividend payout ratio (1)
$
$
$
$
2021
For the Years Ended June 30,
2019
(In Thousands, Except Percentage and Per Share Amounts)
2018
2020
$
234,360
49,851
184,509
(1,121)
185,630
24,751
125,885
84,496
21,263
63,233
$
233,208
83,854
149,354
4,197
145,157
19,719
107,624
57,252
12,287
44,965
$
$
237,333
82,020
155,313
3,556
151,757
13,555
109,243
56,069
13,927
42,142
$
$
171,431
50,138
121,293
2,706
118,587
13,263
97,850
34,000
14,404
19,596
$
$
2017
139,093
36,519
102,574
5,381
97,193
11,348
81,118
27,423
8,820
18,603
0.77
$
0.55
$
0.46
$
0.24
$
0.22
82,387
82,391
0.35
45.1%
$
82,409
82,430
0.29
52.8%
$
91,054
91,100
0.37
80.8%
$
82,587
82,643
0.25
102.9%
$
84,590
84,661
0.10
45.0%
(1)
Represents cash dividends declared divided by net income.
42
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets (net income divided
by average total assets)
Return on average equity (net income divided
by average total equity)
Return on average tangible equity (net income divided by
by average tangible equity) (1)
Net interest rate spread
Net interest margin
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-earning liabilities
Efficiency ratio (non-interest expenses divided
by sum of net interest income and non-interest income)
Non-interest expense to average assets
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans
Non-performing assets to total assets
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
Allowance for credit losses to total loans
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans
Capital Ratios:
Average equity to average assets
Equity to assets at period end
Tangible equity to tangible assets at period end (2)
2021
0.86%
5.79%
7.22%
2.61%
2.75%
At or For the Years Ended June 30,
2019
2020
2018
0.67%
4.10%
5.10%
2.22%
2.45%
0.63%
3.52%
4.30%
2.31%
2.56%
0.37%
1.81%
2.08%
2.25%
2.50%
2017
0.40%
1.68%
1.87%
2.14%
2.41%
118.63%
117.24%
118.88%
125.12%
132.14%
60.16%
1.72%
63.66%
1.61%
64.69%
1.64%
72.72%
1.86%
71.20%
1.76%
1.64%
1.10%
0.03%
1.19%
72.92%
14.88%
14.32%
11.72%
0.82%
0.55%
0.00%
0.82%
101.72%
16.39%
16.04%
13.29%
0.43%
0.31%
0.02%
0.70%
164.15%
17.97%
16.99%
14.19%
0.37%
0.27%
0.03%
0.68%
183.08%
20.54%
19.28%
16.53%
0.58%
0.43%
0.01%
0.90%
155.18%
24.02%
21.94%
20.14%
(1)
(2)
Average tangible equity equals total average stockholders’ equity reduced by average goodwill and average core deposit intangible assets.
Tangible equity equals total stockholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and core deposit intangible assets.
43
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
This discussion and analysis reflects Kearny Financial Corp.’s consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical
data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. You should read the
information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial information regarding Kearny Financial Corp. and the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. We describe them in detail in Note 1 to our audited
consolidated financial statements. In preparing the audited consolidated financial statements, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of
financial condition and revenues and expenses for the periods then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes relate to the determination of the allowance for
loan losses.
Allowance for Credit Losses. The allowance for credit losses represents the estimated amount considered necessary to cover
lifetime expected credit losses inherent in financial assets at the balance sheet date. The measurement of expected credit losses is
applicable to loans receivable and securities measured at amortized cost. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposures such as
loan commitments and unused lines of credit. The allowance is established through a provision for credit losses that is charged against
income. The methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management
because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the
forecasted economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for credit losses. The
allowance for credit losses is reported separately as a contra-asset on the consolidated statement of financial condition. The expected
credit loss for unfunded lending commitments and unfunded loan commitments is reported on the consolidated statement of financial
condition in other liabilities while the provision for credit losses related to unfunded commitments is reported in other non-interest
expense.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans Receivable. The allowance for credit losses on loans is deducted from the amortized cost
basis of the loan to present the net amount expected to be collected. Expected losses are evaluated and calculated on a collective, or
pooled, basis for those loans which share similar risk characteristics. At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether loans
within a pool continue to exhibit similar risk characteristics. If the risk characteristics of a loan change, such that they are no longer
similar to other loans in the pool, the Company will evaluate the loan with a different pool of loans that share similar risk
characteristics. If the loan does not share risk characteristics with other loan pools, the Company will evaluate the loan on an
individual basis. The Company evaluates the pooling methodology at least annually. Loans are charged off against the allowance for
credit losses when the Company believes the balances to be uncollectible. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts
previously charged off or expected to be charged off.
The Company has chosen to segment its portfolio consistent with the manner in which it manages credit risk. Such segments
include multi-family, nonresidential mortgage, commercial business, construction, one- to four-family residential, home equity and
consumer. For most segments the Company calculates estimated credit losses using a probability of default and loss given default
methodology, the results of which are applied to the aggregated discounted cash flow of each individual loan within the segment. The
point in time probability of default and loss given default are then conditioned by macroeconomic scenarios to incorporate reasonable
and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount.
The Company estimates the allowance for credit losses on loans via a quantitative analysis which considers relevant available
information from internal and external sources related to past events and current conditions, as well as the incorporation of reasonable
and supportable forecasts. The Company evaluates a variety of factors including third party economic forecasts, industry trends and
other available published economic information in arriving at its forecasts. After the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the
Company reverts, on a straight-line basis, to average historical losses. Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of
the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and
modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a troubled
debt restructuring will be executed with an individual borrower or the renewal option is included in the original or modified contract at
the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancelable by the Company.
44
Also included in the allowance for credit losses on loans are qualitative reserves to cover losses that are expected but, in the
Company’s assessment, may not be adequately represented in the quantitative analysis or the forecasts described above. Factors that
the Company considers include changes in lending policies and procedures, business conditions, the nature and size of the portfolio,
portfolio concentrations, the volume and severity of past due loans and non-accrual loans, the effect of external factors such as
competition, legal and regulatory requirements, among others. Qualitative loss factors are applied to each portfolio segment with the
amounts judgmentally determined by the relative risk to the most severe loss periods identified in the historical loan charge-offs of a
peer group of similar-sized regional banks.
Individually Evaluated Loans. On a case-by-case basis, the Company may conclude that a loan should be evaluated on an
individual basis based on its disparate risk characteristics. When the Company determines that a loan no longer shares similar risk
characteristics with other loans in the portfolio, the allowance will be determined on an individual basis using the present value of
expected cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral as of the reporting date, less estimated selling
costs, as applicable. If the fair value of the collateral is less than the amortized cost basis of the loan, the Company will charge off the
difference between the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell at the reporting date and the amortized cost basis of the loan.
Acquired Loans. Acquired loans are included in the Company's calculation of the allowance for credit losses. How the
allowance on an acquired loan is recorded depends on whether or not it has been classified as a PCD loan. PCD loans are loans
acquired at a discount that is due, in part, to credit quality. PCD loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 326-20 and
are initially recorded at fair value as determined by the sum of the present value of expected future cash flows and an allowance for
credit losses at acquisition. The allowance for PCD loans is recorded through a gross-up effect, while the allowance for acquired non-
PCD loans is recorded through provision expense, consistent with originated loans. Thus, the determination of which loans are PCD
and non-PCD can have a significant impact on the accounting for these loans. Subsequent to acquisition, the allowance for PCD loans
will generally follow the same estimation, provision and charge-off process as non-PCD acquired and originated loans.
Business Combinations. We account for business combinations under the purchase method of accounting. The application of
this method of accounting requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions in the determination of the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in order to properly allocate purchase price consideration between assets that are amortized, accreted
or depreciated from those that are recorded as goodwill or bargain purchase gain. Our estimates of the fair values of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed are based upon assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, and whenever necessary, include assistance from
independent third-party appraisal and valuation firms.
Goodwill. Goodwill arises from business combinations and is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the
consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets
acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination and determined
to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and
circumstances exists that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company performed its annual
impairment test during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an
indefinite life our audited consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.
In assessing impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether the existence of events or
circumstances leads to a determination that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of such events or circumstances, we determine it is not more-likely-than-not that the
fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then we would not be required to perform a quantitative impairment test.
The annual quantitative assessment of goodwill for our single reporting unit was performed utilizing a discounted cash flow
analysis (“income approach”) and estimates of selected market information (“market approach”). The income approach measures the
fair value of an interest in a business by discounting expected future cash flows to present value. The market approach takes into
consideration fair values of comparable companies operating in similar lines of business that are potentially subject to similar
economic and environmental factors and could be considered reasonable investment alternatives. The results of the income approach
were weighted at 50% while the results of the market approach were weighted at 50%. The results of the annual quantitative
impairment analysis indicated that the fair value exceeded the carrying value for our single reporting unit.
No impairment charges were required to be recorded in the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 or 2019. If an impairment loss is
determined to exist in the future, such loss will be reflected as an expense in the consolidated statements of income in the period in
which the impairment loss is determined.
45
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020
Executive Summary. Total assets increased by $525.6 million, or 7.8%, to $7.28 billion at June 30, 2021 from $6.76 billion at
June 30, 2020. As described in greater detail below, the increase in total assets was largely the result of the Company’s July 10, 2020
acquisition of MSB. The increase primarily reflected increases in investment securities, net loans receivable and other assets, partially
offset by decreases in cash and equivalents and loans held-for-sale.
Investment Securities. Investment securities available for sale increased by $291.2 million, to $1.68 billion at June 30, 2021,
from $1.39 billion at June 30, 2020. This increase reflected security purchases totaling $918.7 million, net of security sales totaling
$97.4 million, principal repayments totaling $521.1 million, and a $12.5 million decrease in the fair value of the portfolio to a net
unrealized gain of $10.0 million. Included in this increase were securities acquired from MSB with fair values of $3.5 million at the
time of acquisition.
Investment securities held to maturity increased by $5.5 million to $38.1 million at June 30, 2021 from $32.6 million at June 30,
2020. The increase in the portfolio reflected security purchases totaling $12.3 million, net of principal repayments totaling $6.8
million.
Additional information regarding investment securities at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Loans Held-for-Sale. Loans held-for-sale totaled $16.5 million at June 30, 2021 as compared to $20.8 million at June 30, 2020
and are reported separately from the balance of net loans receivable. During the year ended June 30, 2021, $285.4 million of
residential mortgage loans were sold, resulting in net gains on sale of $5.1 million.
Net Loans Receivable. Net loans receivable increased by $332.2 million, or 7.4%, to $4.79 billion at June 30, 2021 from $4.46
billion at June 30, 2020. Included in this increase were loans with fair values totaling $530.2 million that were acquired in conjunction
with the acquisition of MSB. Partially offsetting this increase was a decrease of $58.8 million in PPP loan balances and a decrease of
$131.2 million in other non-acquired loans. Detail regarding the change in the loan portfolio is presented below:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family mortgage
Nonresidential mortgage
Commercial business
Construction
Total commercial loans
June 30,
2021
June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
Increase/
(Decrease)
$
2,039,260 $
1,079,444
168,951
93,804
3,381,459
2,059,568 $
960,853
138,788
20,961
3,180,170
(20,308)
118,591
30,163
72,843
201,289
One- to four-family residential mortgage
1,447,721
1,273,022
174,699
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans
Other consumer
Total consumer
Total loans
Unaccreted yield adjustments
Allowance for credit losses
47,871
3,259
51,130
82,920
3,991
86,911
(35,049)
(732)
(35,781)
4,880,310
4,540,103
340,207
(28,916)
(58,165)
(41,706)
(37,327)
12,790
(20,838)
Net loans receivable
$
4,793,229 $
4,461,070 $
332,159
46
Commercial loan origination volume for the year ended June 30, 2021 totaled $507.5 million, which comprised $352.5 million
of commercial mortgage loan originations, $104.6 million of commercial business loan originations and construction loan
disbursements of $50.4 million. Commercial loan originations for the period were augmented by the purchase of loans totaling $21.6
million. Additionally, in conjunction with the acquisition of MSB, the Company acquired commercial loans with fair values totaling
approximately $383.1 million.
One- to four-family residential mortgage loan origination volume, excluding loans held-for-sale, totaled $553.2 million for the
year ended June 30, 2021 and was augmented by the purchase of loans totaling $60.1 million. Home equity loan and line of credit
origination volume for the same period totaled $15.8 million. Additionally, in conjunction with the acquisition of MSB, the Company
acquired one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and home equity loans and lines of credit with fair values totaling
approximately $132.5 million and $14.1 million, respectively.
Additional information about the Company’s loans at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Nonperforming Loans and TDRs. Nonperforming loans increased by $43.1 million to $79.8 million, or 1.64% of total loans at
June 30, 2021, from $36.7 million, or 0.82% of total loans at June 30, 2020. Included in this increase were $14.4 million of non-
performing loans acquired from MSB, whose fair values at acquisition reflected various levels of impairment. Non-performing loans
at June 30, 2021 did not include $51.8 million of performing PCD loans acquired from MSB. The increase in nonperforming loans
was largely attributable to increases in non-performing multi-family mortgage loans, nonresidential mortgage loans and one- to four-
family residential mortgage loans, with increases totaling $15.6 million, $13.3 million and $10.8 million, for those loan segments,
respectively.
TDRs are loans where the Company has modified the contractual terms of the loan as a result of the financial condition of the
borrower. Subsequent to their modification, TDRs are placed on non-accrual until such time as satisfactory payment performance has
been demonstrated, at which time the loan may be returned to accrual status. At June 30, 2021, the Company had accruing TDRs
totaling $6.2 million, a decrease of $2.2 million from $8.4 million at June 30, 2020. At June 30, 2021, the Company had non-accrual
TDRs totaling $11.6 million, a decrease of $1.5 million from $13.1 million at June 30, 2020.
As noted above, based on Section 4013 of the CARES Act, the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act and related regulatory
guidance promulgated by federal banking regulators, qualifying loan modifications, including short-term payment deferrals, are not
considered to be TDRs. The Company had active payment deferrals, which were not considered TDRs, of $5.6 million and $781.3
million at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively.
Additional information about nonperforming loans and TDRs at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”). At June 30, 2021, the ACL totaled $58.2 million, or 1.19% of total loans, reflecting an
increase of $20.9 million from $37.3 million, or 0.82% of total loans, at June 30, 2020. This increase largely resulted from the
adoption of CECL, which increased the ACL for loans receivable by $19.6 million, the establishment of an ACL for loans acquired
from MSB totaling $9.0 million and an increase in the portion of the ACL attributable to loans individually evaluated for impairment.
This increase was partially offset by net charge-offs and the impact of an improved economic forecast and credit risk outlook.
Additional information about the allowance for loan credit at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 1 and Note 6 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Other Assets. The aggregate balance of other assets, including premises and equipment, FHLB stock, interest receivable,
goodwill, core deposit intangibles, bank owned life insurance, deferred income taxes, OREO and other assets, increased by $14.1
million to $691.2 million at June 30, 2021 from $677.1 million at June 30, 2020.
The increase in other assets primarily reflected the impact of the MSB acquisition through which the Company acquired other
assets with fair values totaling $34.1 million. The increase in other assets was partially offset by a decrease in the balance of FHLB
stock during the year ended June 30, 2021.
The remaining increases and decreases in other assets for the year ended June 30, 2021 generally reflected normal operating
fluctuations in their respective balances.
47
Deposits. Total deposits increased by $1.06 billion, or 23.8%, to $5.49 billion at June 30, 2021 from $4.43 billion at June 30,
2020. The increase in deposits reflected the impact of organic growth in deposits of $594.9 million coupled with the MSB acquisition
through which the Company assumed deposits with fair values totaling $460.2 million. The following table sets forth the distribution
of, and changes in, deposits, by type, at the dates indicated:
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing demand
Savings
Certificates of deposit
Interest-bearing deposits
Total deposits
June 30,
2021
June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
Increase
593,718 $
419,138 $
174,580
1,902,478
1,111,364
1,877,746
4,891,588
5,485,306 $
1,264,151
906,597
1,840,396
4,011,144
4,430,282 $
638,327
204,767
37,350
880,444
1,055,024
$
$
Additional information about our deposits at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form
10-K, as well as in Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Borrowings. The balance of borrowings decreased by $487.3 million, or 41.5%, to $685.9 million at June 30, 2021 from $1.17
billion at June 30, 2020 and reflected the repayment of maturing FHLB advances totaling $475.0 million, the pre-payment of FHLB
advances totaling $27.0 million and a decrease in depositor sweep accounts totaling $5.7 million. Borrowings at June 30, 2021 also
included other overnight borrowings totaling $20.0 million while there were no such borrowings at June 30, 2020. In conjunction with
the acquisition of MSB, the Company assumed overnight FHLB advances with fair values totaling $62.9 million, which were
immediately repaid.
Additional information about our borrowings at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as well as in Note 11to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Other Liabilities. The balance of other liabilities, including advance payments by borrowers for taxes and other miscellaneous
liabilities, decreased by $942,000 to $69.6 million at June 30, 2021 from $70.6 million at June 30, 2020. The change in the balance of
other liabilities reflected the adoption of CECL, as noted above. At adoption the Company increased its ACL by $536,000 for
unfunded loan commitments while also recording a provision for ACL of $1.2 million during the year ended June 30, 2021. The
change in other liabilities also reflected a $17.5 million decrease in the fair value of the Company’s outstanding liability derivatives
positions which was partially offset by a $12.5 million loan participation liability which was paid shortly after fiscal year-end. The
remaining change generally reflected normal operating fluctuations in the balances of other liabilities during the period.
Additional information about the Company’s derivatives portfolio at June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased by $41.2 million to $1.04 billion at June 30, 2021 from $1.08 billion at
June 30, 2020. The decrease in stockholders’ equity during the year ended June 30, 2021 largely reflected share repurchases totaling
$119.0 million, cash dividends totaling $28.5 million and a $14.2 million cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of
CECL, partially offset by the issuance of $45.1 million of capital stock in conjunction with the acquisition of MSB and net income of
$63.2 million.
Book value per share increased by $0.25 to $13.21 at June 30, 2021 while tangible book value per share increased by $0.10 to
$10.49 at June 30, 2021.
48
In March 2019 the Company announced its fourth stock repurchase plan which authorized the repurchase of 9,218,324 shares,
or 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On March 25, 2020, that plan was temporarily suspended due to the risks and
uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and on October 19, 2020, the Company announced the resumption of that plan.
On October 19, 2020, the Company also announced the approval of a fifth repurchase plan totaling 4,475,523 shares, or 5%, of the
Company’s outstanding common stock. On January 22, 2021, the Company announced the completion of its fifth stock repurchase
plan and the authorization of a sixth stock repurchase plan to repurchase up to 4,210,520 shares, or 5%, of the Company’s outstanding
stock. On May 26, 2021, the Company announced the completion of its sixth stock repurchase plan and the authorization of a seventh
stock repurchase plan to repurchase up to 4,064,649 shares, or 5%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company repurchased a total of 10,567,073 shares of its common stock which were
repurchased in conjunction with the Company’s fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh repurchase plans. Such shares were repurchased at a
total cost of $119.0 million and at an average cost of $11.26 per share.
Including shares previously repurchased, the shares associated with the fourth repurchase plan were repurchased at a total cost
of $117.9 million and at an average cost of $12.79 per share. The shares associated with the Company’s fifth share repurchase plan
were repurchased at a total cost of $46.9 million and at an average cost of $10.48 per share. The shares associated with the Company’s
sixth share repurchase plan were repurchased at a total cost of $51.1 million and at an average cost of $12.15 per share.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, and in conjunction with the Company’s seventh repurchase program, the Company
repurchased 1,120,000 shares at a cost of $14.2 million and at an average cost of $12.65 per share which represented 27.6% of the
total shares authorized to be repurchased.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2020
Net Income. Net income for the year ended June 30, 2021 was $63.2 million, or $0.77 per diluted share, an increase of 40.6%
from $45.0 million, or $0.55 per diluted share for the year ended June 30, 2020. The increase in net income reflected increases in net
interest income and non-interest income and a decrease in the provision for credit losses that was partially offset by increases in non-
interest expense and income tax expense. Net income for the year ended June 30, 2021 also reflected various non-recurring items,
including items recognized in conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of MSB.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $35.2 million to $184.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. The
increase between the comparative periods resulted from a decrease of $34.0 million in interest expense and an increase of $1.2 million
in interest income.
Net interest spread increased by 39 basis points to 2.61% for the year ended June 30, 2021, from 2.22% for the year ended June
30, 2020. Net interest margin increased 30 basis points to 2.75%, from 2.45%, for the same comparative periods. The increase in
spread and margin reflected a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities that was partially offset by a decrease in the
average yield on interest-earning assets.
49
Details surrounding the composition of, and changes to, net interest income are presented in the table below which reflects the
components of the average balance sheet and of net interest income for the periods indicated. We derived the average yields and costs
by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented with daily
balances used to derive average balances. No tax equivalent adjustments have been made to yield or costs. Non-accrual loans were
included in the calculation of average balances, however interest receivable on these loans has been fully reserved for and therefore
not included in interest income. The yields and costs set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that
are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense and exclude the impact of prepayment penalties, which are recorded to non-
interest income.
2021
For the Years Ended June 30,
2020
2019
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Cost
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Cost
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Cost
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable (1)
Taxable investment securities (2)
Tax-exempt securities (2)
Other interest-earning assets (3)
Total interest-earning assets
Non-interest-earning assets
Total assets
$4,866,436 $198,515 4.08 % $4,568,816 $187,003 4.09 % $4,669,436 $192,386 4.12 %
1,571,452
74,604
200,435
6,712,927
620,934
$7,333,861
1,291,516
111,477
122,278
6,094,087
595,158
$6,689,245
1,171,335
134,489
101,595
6,076,855
582,838
$6,659,693
37,213 3.18
2,839 2.11
4,895 4.82
237,333 3.91
31,238 1.99
1,652 2.21
2,955 1.47
234,360 3.49
39,321 3.04
2,393 2.15
4,491 3.67
233,208 3.83
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand
Savings
Certificates of deposit
Total interest-bearing deposits
$1,726,190 $
1,066,794
1,931,887
4,724,871
933,711
Total interest-bearing liabilities 5,658,582
583,886
6,242,468
1,091,393
Total liabilities
Stockholders' equity
Non-interest-bearing liabilities (4)
Borrowings
7,028 0.41
3,299 0.31
21,208 1.10
31,535 0.67
18,316 1.96
49,851 0.88
$1,041,188 $ 11,433 1.10
6,735 0.81
40,684 2.00
58,852 1.51
25,002 1.93
83,854 1.61
831,832
2,032,046
3,905,066
1,293,096
5,198,162
394,758
5,592,920
1,096,325
8,125 1.02
4,186 0.55
40,200 1.83
52,511 1.40
29,509 2.17
82,020 1.60
$ 796,815 $
761,203
2,194,513
3,752,531
1,359,323
5,111,854
351,217
5,463,071
1,196,622
Total liabilities and
stockholders'
equity
Net interest income
Interest rate spread (5)
Net interest margin (6)
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities
$7,333,861
$6,689,245
$6,659,693
$184,509
$149,354
$155,313
2.61 %
2.75 %
2.22 %
2.45 %
2.31 %
2.56 %
1.19
X
1.17
X
1.19
X
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Loans held-for-sale and non-accruing loans have been included in loans receivable and the effect of such inclusion was not material.
Allowance for loan losses has been included in non-interest-earning assets.
Fair value adjustments have been excluded in the balances of interest-earning assets.
Includes interest-bearing deposits at other banks and FHLB of New York capital stock.
Includes average balances of non-interest-bearing deposits of $518,149,000, $334,522,000 and $312,169,000, for the years ended June 30,
2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
50
The following table reflects the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense to changes in volume and in
prevailing interest rates during the periods indicated. Each category reflects the: (1) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied
by old rate); (2) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume); and (3) net change. The net change attributable to the
combined impact of volume and rate has been allocated proportionally to the absolute dollar amounts of change in each.
Year Ended June 30, 2021
versus
Year Ended June 30, 2020
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Rate
(In Thousands)
Volume
Net
Year Ended June 30, 2020
versus
Year Ended June 30, 2019
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Rate
(In Thousands)
Volume
$
$
$
11,976 $
7,341
(807)
1,984
20,494 $
(464) $
(15,424)
66
(3,520)
(19,342) $
11,512
(8,083)
(741)
(1,536)
1,152
5,100 $
1,533
(1,923)
(7,067)
(2,357)
(9,505) $
(4,969)
(17,553)
381
(31,646)
(4,405)
(3,436)
(19,476)
(6,686)
(34,003)
$
$
$
(4,023) $
3,770
(498)
890
139 $
(1,360) $
(1,662)
52
(1,294)
(4,264) $
2,634 $
418
(3,094)
(1,378)
(1,420)
674 $
2,131
3,578
(3,129)
3,254
Net
(5,383)
2,108
(446)
(404)
(4,125)
3,308
2,549
484
(4,507)
1,834
Interest and dividend income
Loans receivable
Taxable investment securities
Tax-exempt securities
Other interest-earning assets
Total interest-earning assets
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand
Savings and club
Certificates of deposit
Borrowings
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Change in net interest income
$
22,851 $
12,304 $
35,155
$
1,559 $
(7,518) $
(5,959)
Provision for Credit Losses. The provision for credit losses decreased by $5.3 million to a provision for credit losses reversal of
$1.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2021, compared to a provision for credit losses of $4.2 million for the year ended June 30,
2020. The level of provision for the year ended June 30, 2021 was largely attributable to $5.1 million of provision expense on non-
PCD loans acquired in connection with the acquisition of MSB and an increase of $6.6 million in reserves on individually evaluated
loans, partially offset by a release of reserves within certain loan segments, reflecting the improving credit risk outlook for those asset
classes in the reasonable and supportable forecast. By comparison, the provision for the year ended June 30, 2020 was largely
attributable to increases in qualitative factors associated with the economic impact of COVID-19 under the incurred loss standard.
The increase in reserves on individually evaluated loans, noted above, was largely attributable to five non-performing
commercial real estate loans, with principal balances totaling $16.7 million.
Additional information regarding the allowance for credit losses and the associated provisions recognized during the year ended
June 30, 2021 is presented under “Item 1, Business” on this Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in Note 1 and Note 6 to the
audited consolidated financial statements as well as the Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2021.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased by $5.0 million, or 25.5%, to $24.8 million for the year ended June 30,
2021. Included in non-interest income for the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were various non-recurring items, including items
recognized in conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of MSB.
Fees and service charges decreased by $1.0 million to $5.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. The decrease primarily
reflected a decrease in loan-related fees attributable to a decrease in commercial loan prepayment activity.
Gain on sale and call of securities reflected a net gain of $767,000 during the year ended June 30, 2021 compared to a net gain
of $2.3 million, recorded during the earlier comparative period.
Gain on sale of loans increased by $2.4 million to $5.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. The increase in loan sale gains
reflected an increase in the volume of loans originated and sold between comparative periods coupled with an increase in the average
gain per loan. The increase for the year ended June 30, 2021 also included gains of $352,000 recognized on the sale of $43.6 million
of PPP loans.
51
The Company recognized a net loss of $28,000 related to the write down and sale of OREO during the year ended June 30,
2020, while there was no such loss recorded during the current period.
Bargain purchase gain totaled $3.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. The bargain purchase gain resulted from a decline
in the market value of the Company’s stock, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which occurred between the announcement date and
closing date of the MSB acquisition. There was no such gain recorded in the prior comparative period.
Other non-interest income increased by $1.6 million to $1.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. The increase primarily
reflected $309,000 of PPP-related referral fees and $1.0 million of non-recurring gains on asset disposals recognized in the current
period, as compared to $342,000 of non-recurring losses on asset disposals recognized in the prior comparative period.
The remaining changes in the other components of non-interest income between comparative periods generally reflected normal
operating fluctuations within those line items.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased by $18.3 million, or 17.0%, to $125.9 million for the year ended June
30, 2021. Included in non-interest expense for the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were various non-recurring items, including
items recognized in conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of MSB.
Salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $6.8 million to $68.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. This
increase primarily reflected additional salary and payroll tax expense associated with employees retained in conjunction with the MSB
acquisition and new hires, who were largely concentrated within the lending and retail banking lines of business. These increases were
partially offset by decreases in employee severance, ESOP expense and stock benefit plan expense.
Net occupancy expense of premises increased by $1.2 million to $12.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. This increase
was largely attributable to the ongoing operating expenses associated with the owned and leased office facilities acquired in
conjunction with the MSB acquisition coupled with an increase of $460,000 in snow removal expense. The change in net occupancy
expense also reflected $22,000 of lease termination costs that were incurred during the current period. By comparison, lease
termination costs totaling $517,000 were incurred in the prior comparative period.
Equipment and systems expense increased by $3.1 million to $14.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. This increase was
largely attributable to increases in equipment, technology infrastructure, core processing and electronic banking delivery channel
expense associated with the Company’s growth in clients and accounts, a portion of which was attributable to the acquisition of MSB.
This increase also reflected non-recurring core processing expense reductions totaling $907,000 that were recorded in the prior
comparative period that were associated with the re-negotiation of the Company’s core processing contract.
Advertising and marketing expense decreased by $627,000 to $2.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. This decrease
largely reflected changes in advertising expense across a variety of advertising formats reflecting normal fluctuations in the timing of
certain campaigns supporting our loan and deposit growth initiatives.
FDIC insurance premiums increased by $1.7 million to $1.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. This increase was
attributable to no expense being recorded during the first nine months of fiscal 2020 as a result of credits available to the Bank under
the FDIC’s Small Bank Assessment Credit program.
Merger-related expenses, associated with the Company’s acquisition of MSB, increased by $3.4 million to $4.3 million for the
year ended June 30, 2021.
Debt extinguishment expenses, resulting from the pre-payment of FHLB advances, totaled $796,000 for the year ended June 30,
2021 as compared to $2.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2020.
Other expense increased by $4.1 million to $17.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2021. This increase, for the year ended
June 30, 2021, was primarily attributable to asset impairment charges of $1.9 million, arising from the transfer of various branch and
administrative facilities to held-for sale status and $800,000, attributable to the partial write-down of the value of the Company’s
equity investment in a start-up financial technology company whose remaining book value totaled $200,000 as of that date. Also
included in other expense, for the year ended June 30, 2021, was $1.2 million of credit loss expense for off-balance sheet exposures
required in connection with the Company’s adoption of CECL for which no such expense was recorded in the prior comparative
period. For the year ended June 30, 2020, the recovery of an asset write-down totaling $288,000 was recorded.
52
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes increased by $9.0 million to $21.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2021, from $12.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2020.
The increase in income tax expense largely reflected a higher level of pre-tax net income, as compared to the prior period,
resulting in a higher provision for income tax expense. This increase also reflected a $1.6 million reduction in income tax expense that
was recorded in the prior comparative period, which was attributable to the carryback of net operating losses into prior periods.
Effective tax rates for the year ended June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020 were 25.2% and 21.5%, respectively. The effective tax
rate for the year ended June 30, 2021 largely reflected the effects of various non-recurring items recorded in conjunction with the
Company’s acquisition of MSB, including non-deductible merger related expenses, which were partially offset by a non-taxable
bargain purchase gain. The effective tax rate for the prior comparative period was primarily driven by a reduction of income tax
expense attributable to the carryback of net operating losses, as discussed above.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2020, and June 30, 2019
A comparison of our operating results for the years ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019 can be found in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2020, filed with the SEC on August 28, 2020.
Liquidity and Commitments
Liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of operating, investing and financing activities. The
Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, cash flows from investment securities and loans receivable and funds
provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization and maturity of loans and investment securities are
relatively predictable sources of funds, general interest rates, economic conditions and competition greatly influence deposit flows and
prepayments on loans and securities.
Liquidity, at June 30, 2021, included $67.9 million of short-term cash and equivalents supplemented by $1.68 billion of
investment securities classified as available for sale which can readily be sold or pledged as collateral, if necessary. In addition, the
Company has the capacity to borrow additional funds from the FHLB, Federal Reserve Bank or via unsecured lines of credit. As of
June 30, 2021, the Company had the capacity to borrow additional funds totaling $2.13 billion and $233.1 million, without pledging
additional collateral, from the FHLB of New York and Federal Reserve Bank, respectively. The Company also had the capacity to
borrow additional funds, on an unsecured basis, via lines of credit established with other financial institutions. As of June 30, 2021,
the available borrowing capacity under those lines of credit totaled $651.0 million.
Deposits increased $1.06 billion to $5.49 billion at June 30, 2021 from $4.43 billion at June 30, 2020. The increase in deposit
balances reflected an $880.4 million increase in interest-bearing deposits coupled with a $174.6 million increase in non-interest-
bearing deposits. Borrowings from the FHLB of New York and other sources are generally available to supplement the Bank’s
liquidity position or to replace maturing deposits. As of June 30, 2021, the Bank’s outstanding balance of FHLB advances, excluding
fair value adjustments, totaled $667.5 million.
The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our short-term borrowings at and for the
periods shown:
2021
390,000
646,896
815,000
At or For the Years Ended June 30,
2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
$
$
865,000
904,262
1,075,000
$
$
$
0.33 %
1.08 %
0.45 %
2.14 %
2019
825,000
854,554
975,000
2.54 %
2.48 %
Balance at end of year
Average balance during year
Maximum outstanding at any month end
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
Weighted average interest rate during year
$
$
$
53
The following table discloses our contractual obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2021:
Less than
One Year
One to
Three Years
At June 30, 2021
Over Three
Years to
Five Years
(In Thousands)
Over Five
Years
Total
Contractual obligations
Operating lease obligations
Certificates of deposit
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
$
3,604 $
5,370 $
1,510,761
390,000
287,984
167,500
3,676 $
72,703
110,000
7,205 $
6,298
-
19,855
1,877,746
667,500
Total contractual obligations
$
1,904,365 $
460,854 $
186,379 $
13,503 $
2,565,101
Commitments
Undisbursed funds from approved lines of credit (1)
Construction loans in process (1)
Other commitments to extend credit (1)
$
86,176 $
28,207 $
138,328
192,832
-
-
7,231 $
-
-
59,464 $
-
-
181,078
138,328
192,832
Total commitments
$
417,336 $
28,207 $
7,231 $
59,464 $
512,238
(1)
Represents amounts committed to customers.
In addition to the loan commitments noted above, the pipeline of loans held for sale included $48.4 million of in process loans
whose terms included interest rate locks to borrowers that were paired with a best-efforts commitment to sell the loan to a buyer at a
fixed price and within a predetermined timeframe after the sale commitment is established.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of our business of investing in loans and
securities as well as in the normal course of maintaining and improving our facilities. These financial instruments include significant
purchase commitments, such as commitments related to capital expenditure plans and commitments to extend credit to meet the
financing needs of our customers. We had no significant off-balance sheet commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2021.
In addition to the commitments noted above, we are party to standby letters of credit totaling approximately $739,000 at June
30, 2021 through which we guarantee certain specific business obligations of our commercial customers.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established
in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by
the customer. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies
in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments. Since many of the commitments are
expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
At June 30, 2021, outstanding loan commitments relating to loans held in portfolio totaled $512.2 million compared to $145.1
million at June 30, 2020. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment
amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For additional information regarding our outstanding lending
commitments at June 30, 2021, see Note 17 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
54
Capital
Consistent with our goals to operate as a sound and profitable financial organization, Kearny Financial and Kearny Bank
actively seek to maintain our well capitalized status in accordance with regulatory standards. As of June 30, 2021, Kearny Financial
and Kearny Bank exceeded all capital requirements of the federal banking regulators and were considered well capitalized.
The following table presents information regarding the Bank’s regulatory capital levels at June 30, 2021:
Actual
Amount
Ratio
At June 30, 2021
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
Ratio
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Amount
Ratio
$ 761,883
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
726,737
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) 726,737
726,737
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)
17.22 % $ 353,970
16.42 % 265,477
16.42 % 199,108
10.23 % 284,114
8.00 % $ 442,462
6.00 % 353,970
4.50 % 287,600
4.00 % 355,142
10.00 %
8.00 %
6.50 %
5.00 %
The following table presents information regarding the consolidated Company’s regulatory capital levels at June 30, 2020:
At June 30, 2021
Actual
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)
Amount
$
872,823
837,677
837,677
837,677
Ratio
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
19.65 % $
18.86 %
18.86 %
11.76 %
355,274
266,456
199,842
284,877
Ratio
8.00 %
6.00 %
4.50 %
4.00 %
For additional information regarding regulatory capital at June 30, 2021, see Note 15 to the audited consolidated financial
statements.
Impact of Inflation
The financial statements included in this document have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. These principles require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms
of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Our primary assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on our
performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates, however, do not necessarily move in the same direction or
with the same magnitude as the price of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation. In a period of rapidly rising
interest rates, the liquidity and maturities of our assets and liabilities are critical to the maintenance of acceptable performance levels.
The principal effect of inflation on earnings, as distinct from levels of interest rates, is in the area of non-interest expense.
Expense items such as employee compensation, employee benefits and occupancy and equipment costs may be subject to increases as
a result of inflation. An additional effect of inflation is the possible increase in the dollar value of the collateral securing loans that we
have made. We are unable to determine the extent, if any, to which properties securing our loans have appreciated in dollar value due
to inflation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of the expected impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements that have yet to be adopted by us, please
refer to Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
55
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management of Interest Rate Risk and Market Risk
The majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Consequently, interest rate risk is a significant
form of business risk that we must manage. Interest rate risk is generally defined in regulatory nomenclature as the risk to earnings or
capital arising from the movement of interest rates and arises from several risk factors including re-pricing risk, basis risk, yield curve
risk and option risk.
We maintain an Asset/Liability Management (“ALM”) program in order manage our interest rate risk. The program is overseen
by the Board of Directors through its Interest Rate Risk Management Committee which has assigned the responsibility for the
operational aspects of the ALM program to our Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”). The ALCO is a management
committee comprising the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Lending Officer, Chief
Credit Officer, Chief Banking Officer, Chief Risk Officer and Treasurer/Chief Investment Officer. Additional members of our
management team may be asked to participate on the ALCO, as appropriate.
The quantitative analysis that we conduct measures interest rate risk from both a capital and earnings perspective. With regard to
earnings, movements in interest rates and the shape of the yield curve significantly influence the amount of net interest income (“NII”)
that we recognize. Movements in market interest rates, and the effect of such movements on the risk factors noted above, significantly
influence the spread between the interest earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest paid on our interest-bearing liabilities.
Our internal interest rate risk analysis calculates the sensitivity of our projected NII over a one year period utilizing a static balance
sheet assumption through which incoming and outgoing asset and liability cash flows are reinvested into similar instruments. Product
pricing and earning asset prepayment speeds are appropriately adjusted for each rate scenario.
With regard to capital, our internal interest rate risk analysis calculates the sensitivity of our Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”)
ratio to movements in interest rates. EVE represents the present value of the expected cash flows from our assets less the present value
of the expected cash flows arising from our liabilities adjusted for the value of off-balance sheet instruments. EVE attempts to
quantify our economic value using a discounted cash flow methodology while the EVE ratio reflects that value as a form of capital
ratio. The degree to which the EVE ratio changes for any hypothetical interest rate scenario from its base case measurement is a
reflection of an institution’s sensitivity to interest rate risk.
For both earnings and capital at risk our interest rate risk analysis calculates a base case scenario that assumes no change in
interest rates. The model then measures changes throughout a series of interest rate scenarios representing immediate and permanent,
parallel shifts in the yield curve up and down 100, 200 and 300 basis points with additional scenarios modeled where appropriate. The
model requires that interest rates remain positive for all points along the yield curve for each rate scenario which may preclude the
modeling of certain falling rate scenarios during periods of lower market interest rates. The relatively low level of interest rates
prevalent at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020 precluded the modeling of certain falling rate scenarios.
56
The following tables present the results of our internal EVE analysis as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively:
June 30, 2021
EVE as a % of
Present Value of Assets
% Change
in EVE
EVE Ratio
(9) %
(5) %
(1) %
-
(10) %
June 30, 2020
16.45 %
16.72 %
16.89 %
16.65 %
14.84 %
Change in
EVE Ratio
(20) bps
7 bps
24 bps
-
(181) bps
EVE as a % of
Present Value of Assets
Change in
Interest Rates
$ Amount
of EVE
Economic Value of
Equity ("EVE")
$ Change
in EVE
(Dollars in Thousands)
(104,809)
(55,741)
(11,766)
-
(117,193)
1,083,847
1,132,915
1,176,890
1,188,656
1,071,463
Economic Value of
Equity ("EVE")
$ Change
in EVE
(Dollars in Thousands)
11,882
38,581
38,713
-
961,579
988,278
988,410
949,697
829,775
+300 bps
+200 bps
+100 bps
0 bps
-100 bps
+300 bps
+200 bps
+100 bps
0 bps
-100 bps
Change in
Interest Rates
$ Amount
of EVE
% Change
in EVE
EVE Ratio
1 %
4 %
4 %
-
15.57 %
15.61 %
15.28 %
14.44 %
12.60 %
(119,922)
(13) %
Change in
EVE Ratio
113 bps
117 bps
84 bps
-
(184) bps
There are numerous internal and external factors that may contribute to changes in our EVE ratio and its sensitivity. Changes in
the composition and allocation of our balance sheet, or utilization of off-balance sheet instruments such as derivatives, can
significantly alter the exposure to interest rate risk as quantified by the changes in the EVE sensitivity measures. Changes to certain
external factors, most notably changes in the level of market interest rates and overall shape of the yield curve, can also alter the
projected cash flows of our interest-earning assets and interest-costing liabilities and the associated present values thereof.
The following tables present the results of our internal NII analysis as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively:
Change in
Interest Rates
Balance Sheet
Composition
Measurement
Period
$ Amount
of NII
June 30, 2021
Net Interest
Income ("NII")
$ Change
in NII
+300 bps
+200 bps
+100 bps
0 bps
-100 bps
Static
Static
Static
Static
Static
$
One Year
One Year
One Year
One Year
One Year
(Dollars In Thousands)
175,830 $
182,089
187,961
191,908
181,645
(16,078)
(9,819)
(3,947)
-
(10,263)
Change in
Interest Rates
Balance Sheet
Composition
Measurement
Period
$ Amount
of NII
June 30, 2020
Net Interest
Income ("NII")
$ Change
in NII
+300 bps
+200 bps
+100 bps
0 bps
-100 bps
Static
Static
Static
Static
Static
$
One Year
One Year
One Year
One Year
One Year
(Dollars In Thousands)
146,062 $
150,502
154,612
155,072
162,070
(9,010)
(4,570)
(460)
-
6,998
% Change
in NII
(8.38) %
(5.12)
(2.06)
-
(5.35)
% Change
in NII
(5.81) %
(2.95)
(0.30)
-
4.51
57
Notwithstanding the rate change scenarios presented in the EVE and NII-based analyses above, future interest rates and their
effect on net interest income are not predictable. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, prepayments and deposit run-offs and should not be relied
upon as indicative of actual results. Certain shortcomings are inherent in this type of computation. Although certain assets and
liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react at different times and in different degrees to changes in
market interest rates. The interest rate on certain types of assets and liabilities, such as demand deposits and savings accounts, may
fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in
market interest rates. Certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgages, generally have features which restrict changes in interest rates
on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayments and early withdrawal levels
could deviate significantly from those assumed in the analyses set forth above. Additionally, an increase in credit risk may result as
the ability of borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K immediately following
Item 16.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial
officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K such disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive
and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
(b)
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
1. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appears in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements that are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K immediately following Item 16. Such report is
incorporated herein by reference.
2.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The report of Crowe LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting appears in the Company’s consolidated financial statements that are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
immediately following Item 16. Such report is incorporated herein by reference.
3.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
During the last quarter of the year under report, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
58
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information that appears under the headings included under “Proposal I – Election of Directors” and “Corporate
Governance Matters” in the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the Registrant’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the Registrant’s fiscal year end (the “Proxy Statement”) is
incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting
officer. A copy of the code of ethics is available on our website at www.kearnybank.com under the “Investors Relations” link, then
within the “Corporate Overview” drop down and under the link “Governance Documents” or without charge upon request to the
Corporate Secretary, Kearny Financial Corp., 120 Passaic Avenue, Fairfield, New Jersey 07004.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information that appears under the headings “Executive Compensation”, “Director Compensation” and “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
(a)
(b)
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners. Information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy
Statement.
Security Ownership of Management. Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section
captioned “Proposal I – Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement.
(c) Changes in Control. Management of the Company knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person of
securities of the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.
(d)
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. Set forth below is information as of June 30,
2021 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Registrant are authorized for issuance.
(A)
(B)
Number of Securities
to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(C)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans -
Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (A)
138,040 $
3,538,676 $
- $
3,676,716 $
10.67
13.35
-
13.25
-
572,628
-
572,628
Equity compensation plans
approved by stockholders (1):
2005 Stock Compensation
and Incentive Plan
2016 Equity Incentive Plan
Equity compensation plans
not approved by stockholders:
None.
Total
(1)
The number of securities reported in column (A) includes 2,510,040 vested options and 743,000 non-vested options outstanding as of June 30,
2021. In addition to these options, restricted stock awards of 423,676 shares were also non-vested as of June 30, 2021. The non-vested options
and restricted stock awards are earned at the rate of 20% one year after the date of the grant and 20% annually thereafter. As of June 30, 2021,
there were 572,628 options remaining available for award under the approved equity compensation plans and are reported under column (C) as
securities remaining available for future issuance under such plans.
59
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information that appears under the sections captioned “Corporate Governance Matters – Transactions with Certain Related
Persons” and “– Board Independence” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information relating to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained under the section
captioned “Proposal III – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor” in the Proxy Statement.
60
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
PART IV
(1) The following financial statements and the independent auditors’ report appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
immediately after Item 16:
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Income For the Years Ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income For the Years Ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-1
F-2
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-11
F-13
(2) All schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable, or the required information is shown in the
consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
Articles of Incorporation of Kearny Financial Corp. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-198602), originally filed on September 5, 2014)
Bylaws of Kearny Financial Corp. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-198602), originally filed on September 5, 2014)
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Kearny Financial Corp. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-198602), originally filed on September 5, 2014)
Description of Capital Stock of Kearny Financial Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Kearny Financial
Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on August 28, 2020)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Kearny Bank and Craig Montanaro dated May 18, 2015
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-
37399), originally filed on September 14, 2015)†
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Kearny Financial Corp. and Craig Montanaro dated May 18,
2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-
37399), originally filed on September 14, 2015)†
Employment Agreement between Kearny Bank and Patrick M. Joyce dated May 18, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on
September 14, 2015)†
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Kearny Bank and Eric B. Heyer dated July 1, 2018 (Incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.5 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399, originally filed
on August 28, 2018)†
Employment Agreement between Kearny Bank and Erika K. Parisi dated May 18, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on
September 14, 2015)†
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement between Kearny Bank and Keith Suchodolski dated July 1, 2018
(Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-
37399, originally filed on August 28, 2018)†
61
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
21
23.1
Employment Agreement between Kearny Bank and Thomas D. DeMedici dated June 21, 2017 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on
August 28, 2019)†
Change of Control Agreement between Kearny Bank and Anthony V. Bilotta, Jr. dated July 1, 2018 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed
on August 28, 2019)†
Form of Two Year Change in Control Agreement between Kearny Bank and Certain Officers (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on
September 14, 2015)†
Form of Two Year Change of Control Agreement between Kearny Bank and John V. Dunne and Timothy A. Swansson.
Dated July 1, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
(File No. 001-37399), originally filed on August 28, 2019)†
Directors Consultation and Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on September 14, 2015)†
Amended and Restated Benefit Equalization Plan for Pension Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Kearny
Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on September 14, 2015)†
Amended and Restated Benefits Equalization Plan Related to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally
filed on September 14, 2015)†
Kearny Bank Director Life Insurance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-51093), originally filed on August 18, 2005)†
Form of Amendment to Kearny Bank Director Life Insurance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on September 14, 2015)†
Kearny Bank Executive Life Insurance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-51093), originally filed on August 18, 2005)†
Form of Amendment to Kearny Bank Executive Life Insurance Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to
Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on September 14, 2015)†
Kearny Bank Amended and Restated Officer Change in Control Severance Pay Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on August
28, 2019)†
Kearny Bank Executive Management Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Kearny Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on August 28, 2019) †
Amendment to Freeze Benefit Accruals Under the Kearny Financial Corp. Directors Consultation and Retirement Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-
37399), originally filed on December 23, 2015)†
Kearny Financial Corp. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Kearny Financial Corp’s
Proxy Statement (File No. 001-37399), originally filed on September 14, 2016)†
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan by and between Kearny Bank and Craig L. Montanaro effective as of July 1,
2021 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Kearny Financial Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-
37399), originally filed on June 21, 2021)†
Subsidiaries of Registrant
Consent of Crowe LLP
62
31.1
31.2
32.1
101
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2021, formatted in Inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,
(iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and
(vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document (The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL
tags are embedded with the Inline XBRL document)
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
†
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.
63
[This page intentionally left blank.]
120 PASSAIC AVENUE (cid:3) FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004-3510 (cid:3) 973-244-4500
August 27, 2021
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Kearny Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance to the management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published
consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and the directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to consolidated financial statement preparation and presentation.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2021. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its assessment, management believes that, as of June 30,
2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an
audit report on the effective operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2021, a copy of which
is included in this annual report.
/s/ Craig L. Montanaro
Craig L. Montanaro
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Keith Suchodolski
Keith Suchodolski
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Kearny Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Fairfield, New Jersey
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Kearny Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2021, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as
of June 30, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
June 30, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2021, based on criteria
established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
Explanatory Paragraph – Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for credit losses
effective July 1, 2020 due to the adoption of ASC 326. The adoption of ASC 326 and its subsequent application is also communicated
as a critical audit matter below.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud,
and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining,
on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness
of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-2
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the
critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by
communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or
disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
The Company adopted ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses on July 1, 2020, using the modified retrospective method for
financial assets measured at amortized cost. Upon adoption the Company recorded a decrease to retained earnings of $14.2 million,
net of tax, for the cumulative effect of adopting ASC 326, as noted in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,
which included $13.8 million for the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on loans. The 2021 provision for credit losses was a reversal
of provision of $1.1 million. As of June 30, 2021, the ACL on loans was $58.2 million. The Company has disclosed the impact of
adoption in Note 2 (see change in accounting principle explanatory paragraph above) to the consolidated financial statements and the
allowance for credit losses on loans as of June 30, 2021 is disclosed in Notes 2 and 6. ASC 326 requires the measurement of expected
lifetime credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized cost at the reporting date. The measurement is based on historical
experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts and requires enhanced disclosures related to the significant
estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s
portfolio.
Management employs a process and methodology to estimate the ACL on loans that evaluates both quantitative and qualitative
factors. The methodology for evaluating quantitative factors includes pooling loans into portfolio segments for loans that share similar
risk characteristics. Pooled loan portfolio segments include multi-family, nonresidential mortgage, commercial business, construction,
one-to-four-family residential mortgage, home equity and consumer loans.
For pooled loans, the Company utilizes a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology to estimate credit losses over the expected life
of loan. The DCF methodology combines probability of default, the loss given default, maturity date and prepayment speed
assumptions to estimate a reserve for each loan. The quantitative loss rates are adjusted by current and forecasted macroeconomic
assumptions and return to the mean after the forecasted periods. The sum of all the loan level reserves are aggregated for each
portfolio segment and a loss factor is derived. These quantitative loss factors are also supplemented by certain qualitative risk factors
reflecting management’s view of how losses may vary from those represented by quantitative loss rates. Qualitative loss factors are
applied to each portfolio segment with the amounts determined by correlation of credit stress to the maximum loss factors of a peer
group’s historical charge-offs. Changes in these assumptions could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results.
F-3
We identified auditing ACL on pooled loans as a critical audit matter because the methodology to determine the estimate of credit
losses significantly changed upon adoption of ASC 326, including the application of new accounting policies, the use of subjective
judgments for both the quantitative and qualitative calculations and overall changes made to the loss estimation models. Performing
audit procedures to evaluate the implementation and subsequent application of ASC 326 for loans involved a high degree of auditor
judgment and required significant effort, including the need to involve more experienced audit personnel and valuation specialists.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
•
•
Testing the effectiveness of controls over the evaluation of the ACL on the pooled loans, including controls addressing:
o The selection and application of new accounting policies.
o Data inputs, judgments and calculations used to determine the loss factors.
o
o
o Management’s review of the qualitative factors.
Information technology general controls and application controls.
Problem loan identification and delinquency monitoring.
Substantively testing management’s process, including evaluating their judgments and assumptions, for developing the ACL
on pooled loans, which included:
o Evaluating the appropriateness of the Company’s accounting policies, judgments and elections involved in adoption
of ASC 326.
o Testing the mathematical accuracy of the calculation.
o Utilizing internal specialists to perform procedures to assist in evaluating the relevance of the macroeconomic loss
drivers.
o Utilizing internal specialists to assist in testing the mathematical accuracy of the underlying peer data used to
calculated PD and LGD rates used within the discounted cash flow model.
o Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments related to the probability of default, loss given default,
including evaluating the use of peer data used to estimate these metrics in the absence of relevant and reliable
internal data.
o Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments related to qualitative adjustments to determine if they are
calculated to conform with management’s policies and were consistently applied from the point of adoption to year
end.
Acquisition of MSB Financial Corp. – Acquired Loans
As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on July 10, 2020 the Company completed its acquisition of MSB
Financial Corp. (“MSB”) for total consideration of $55 million. The Company accounted for this transaction under the acquisition
method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, which requires purchased assets and liabilities assumed
and consideration exchanged to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition.
Management engaged a third-party specialist to develop the fair value estimate of MSB’s loan portfolio as of the acquisition date in
accordance with ASC 820. Inputs and assumptions used in the fair value estimate of the loan portfolio includes interest rate, servicing,
credit and liquidity risk, and required equity return. The fair value of loans was calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis and
the loans had a fair value of $530.2 million and a contractual balance of $537.6 million at the acquisition date.
We identified the acquisition date fair value of acquired MSB loans as a critical audit matter as auditing this estimate requires
subjective auditor judgment. The principal considerations for this determination are the level of judgment involved in evaluating
management’s classification of loans with evidence of credit deterioration, the need for specialized skill in evaluating the
reasonableness of unobservable inputs and assumptions used in management’s estimation of the fair value of all acquired loans, and
the size of the acquired loan portfolio.
F-4
The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
•
•
Testing the design and operating effectiveness of control over the estimate of fair value of acquired MSB loans, including
controls addressing:
o Management’s evaluation of the reasonableness of the methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value.(cid:9)
o Management’s review of the completeness and accuracy of the loan level data used in the calculation.(cid:9)(cid:9)
o Management’s evaluation of the classification of purchased credit deteriorated loans.
Substantively testing management’s process, including evaluating their judgments, for estimating the fair value of acquired
MSB loans, which included:
o Testing the classification of loans determined to have credit deterioration at acquisition date and evaluating the
reasonableness of the criteria utilized by management in their determination;(cid:9)(cid:9)
o Utilizing internal specialists to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of significant assumptions and methods
utilized, and overall reasonableness of the fair values;
o Testing the completeness and accuracy of the loan level data used in the calculation.
/s/ Crowe LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.
Livingston, New Jersey
August 27, 2021
F-5
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
Cash and cash equivalents
Assets
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost $1,666,853), net of
allowance for credit losses of $0 at June 30, 2021
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value $39,610 and $34,069), respectively, net of
allowance for credit losses of $0 at June 30, 2021
Loans held-for-sale
Loans receivable
Less: allowance for credit losses on loans
Net loans receivable
Premises and equipment
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of New York stock
Accrued interest receivable
Goodwill
Core deposit intangible
Bank owned life insurance
Deferred income tax assets, net
Other real estate owned
Other assets
Total Assets
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Borrowings
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes
Other liabilities
Total Liabilities
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized;
78,964,859 shares and 83,663,192 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
Paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Unearned employee stock ownership plan shares;
2,759,594 shares and 2,960,289 shares, respectively
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Total Stockholders' Equity
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
June 30,
2021
2020
$
21,463 $
46,392
67,855
20,391
160,576
180,967
1,676,864
1,385,703
38,138
16,492
4,851,394
(58,165)
4,793,229
56,338
36,615
19,362
210,895
3,705
283,310
29,323
178
51,431
7,283,735 $
32,556
20,789
4,498,397
(37,327)
4,461,070
57,389
58,654
17,373
210,895
3,995
262,380
25,480
178
40,746
6,758,175
$
$
593,718 $
4,891,588
5,485,306
685,876
15,752
53,857
6,240,791
419,138
4,011,144
4,430,282
1,173,165
16,569
53,982
5,673,998
-
-
790
654,396
408,367
837
722,871
387,911
(26,753)
6,144
1,042,944
7,283,735 $
(28,699)
1,257
1,084,177
6,758,175
$
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Interest Income
Loans
Taxable investment securities
Tax-exempt investment securities
Other interest-earning assets
Total Interest Income
Interest Expense
Deposits
Borrowings
Total Interest Expense
Net Interest Income
(Reversal of) Provision for credit losses
Net Interest Income after (Reversal of) Provision for
Credit Losses
Non-Interest Income
Fees and service charges
Gain (loss) on sale and call of securities
Gain on sale of loans
Loss on sale and write down of other real estate owned
Income from bank owned life insurance
Electronic banking fees and charges
Bargain purchase gain
Other income
Total Non-Interest Income
Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits
Net occupancy expense of premises
Equipment and systems
Advertising and marketing
Federal deposit insurance premium
Directors' compensation
Merger-related expenses
Debt extinguishment expenses
Other expense
Total Non-Interest Expense
Income before Income Taxes
Income tax expense
Net Income
Net Income per Common Share (EPS)
Basic
Diluted
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
Basic
Diluted
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Years Ended June 30,
2020
2021
2019
$
198,515 $
31,238
1,652
2,955
234,360
187,003 $
39,321
2,393
4,491
233,208
31,535
18,316
49,851
184,509
(1,121)
58,852
25,002
83,854
149,354
4,197
192,386
37,213
2,839
4,895
237,333
52,511
29,509
82,020
155,313
3,556
185,630
145,157
151,757
5,622
767
5,574
-
6,267
1,717
3,053
1,751
24,751
6,647
2,250
3,186
(28)
6,225
1,245
-
194
19,719
68,800
12,673
14,870
2,161
1,940
2,993
4,349
796
17,303
125,885
84,496
21,263
63,233 $
62,015
11,424
11,755
2,788
286
3,079
951
2,156
13,170
107,624
57,252
12,287
44,965 $
0.77 $
0.77 $
0.55 $
0.55 $
82,387
82,391
82,409
82,430
5,445
(323)
580
(11)
6,339
1,050
-
475
13,555
63,029
11,220
12,273
3,051
1,779
3,044
-
-
14,847
109,243
56,069
13,927
42,142
0.46
0.46
91,054
91,100
$
$
$
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In Thousands)
Net Income
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) , net of tax:
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available
for sale
Amortization of net unrealized loss on securities
available for sale transferred to held to maturity
Net realized (gain) loss on sale and call of
securities available for sale
Fair value adjustments on derivatives
Benefit plan adjustments
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total Comprehensive Income
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
2019
$
63,233 $
44,965 $
42,142
(8,274)
16,126
-
421
(538)
13,470
229
4,887
68,120 $
(1,587)
(16,310)
(232)
(1,582)
43,383 $
4,336
217
228
(20,298)
(179)
(15,696)
26,446
$
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Unearned
Common Stock
Shares
Amount Capital
Paid-In
Retained
Earnings
996 $ 922,711 $ 359,096 $ (32,590) $
Shares
ESOP
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Total
18,535 $ 1,268,748
Balance - June 30, 2018
99,626 $
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle for the
adoption of ASU 2017-08
Balance - July 1, 2018, as
adjusted for change in
accounting principle
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net
of income tax
ESOP shares committed to be
released (201 shares)
Stock option exercise
Stock option expense
Share repurchases
Issuance of shares under stock
benefit plans
Restricted stock plan shares
earned (284 shares)
Cancellation of shares issued for
restricted stock awards
Cash dividends declared
($0.37 per common share)
-
-
-
(531)
-
-
(531)
99,626
-
996 922,711 358,565
42,142
-
-
-
-
-
-
49
-
(10,625)
-
-
-
716
423
2,005
(105) (141,603)
233
2
(2)
-
-
4,131
(157)
(2)
(987)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(34,028)
(32,590)
-
18,535 1,268,217
42,142
-
-
(15,696)
(15,696)
1,946
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,662
423
2,005
(141,708)
-
-
4,131
-
(989)
-
(34,028)
Balance - June 30, 2019
89,126 $
891 $ 787,394 $ 366,679 $ (30,644) $
2,839 $ 1,127,159
Balance - June 30, 2019
89,126 $
Common Stock
Shares
Amount Capital
Paid-In
Retained
Earnings
891 $ 787,394 $ 366,679 $ (30,644) $
Shares
ESOP
Unearned
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net
of income tax
ESOP shares committed to be
released (201 shares)
Stock option expense
Share repurchases
Restricted stock plan shares
earned (277 shares)
Cancellation of shares issued for
restricted stock awards
Cash dividends declared
($0.29 per common share)
-
-
-
-
-
44,965
-
-
-
(5,376)
-
-
(53)
409
1,838
(69,729)
-
-
4,041
(87)
(1)
(1,082)
-
-
-
(23,733)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,945
-
-
-
-
-
Total
2,839 $ 1,127,159
-
44,965
(1,582)
(1,582)
-
-
-
2,354
1,838
(69,782)
-
4,041
-
(1,083)
-
(23,733)
Balance - June 30, 2020
83,663 $
837 $ 722,871 $ 387,911 $ (28,699) $
1,257 $ 1,084,177
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Unearned
Common Stock
Shares
Amount Capital
Paid-In
Retained
Earnings
837 $ 722,871 $ 387,911 $ (28,699) $
Shares
ESOP
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Total
1,257 $ 1,084,177
Balance - June 30, 2020
83,663 $
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - Topic 326
Balance - July 1, 2020 as
adjusted for change in
accounting principle
Net income
Other comprehensive income, net
of income tax
ESOP shares committed to be
released (201 shares)
Stock option exercise
Stock option expense
Share repurchases
Issuance of shares under stock
benefit plans
Restricted stock plan shares
earned (277 shares)
Cancellation of shares issued for
restricted stock awards
Shares issued in conjunction with
the acquisition of MSB
Financial Corp.
Cash dividends declared
($0.35 per common share)
-
-
-
(14,239)
-
-
(14,239)
83,663
-
837 722,871 373,672
63,233
-
-
-
-
-
-
41
-
(10,567)
-
-
-
123
373
1,823
(105) (118,916)
54
1
(1)
-
-
3,850
(80)
(1)
(802)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(28,699)
-
1,257 1,069,938
63,233
-
-
4,887
4,887
1,946
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,069
373
1,823
(119,021)
-
-
3,850
-
(803)
5,854
58
45,075
-
-
-
45,133
-
-
(28,538)
-
(28,538)
Balance - June 30, 2021
78,965 $
790 $ 654,396 $ 408,367 $ (26,753) $
6,144 $ 1,042,944
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
Net (accretion) amortization of premiums, discounts and loan fees and costs
Deferred income taxes and valuation allowance
Bargain purchase gain
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization (accretion) of benefit plans’ unrecognized net gain
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses
Loss on write-down and sales of other real estate owned
Loans originated for sale
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale, net
Realized (gain) loss on sale/call of securities available for sale
Realized loss on debt extinguishment
Realized gain on sale of loans receivable
Realized (gain) loss on disposition of premises and equipment
Loss on write-down of premises
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
ESOP, stock option plan and restricted stock plan expenses
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(Decrease) increase in interest payable
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchases of:
Investment securities available for sale
Investment securities held to maturity
Proceeds from:
Repayments/calls/maturities of investment securities available for sale
Repayments/calls/maturities of investment securities held to maturity
Sale of investment securities available for sale
Purchase of loans
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable
Proceeds from sale of loans receivable
Purchase of interest rate caps
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
Additions to premises and equipment
Proceeds from cash settlement of premises and equipment
Purchase of FHLB stock
Redemption of FHLB stock
Net cash acquired in acquisition
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-11
Years Ended June 30,
2020
2021
2019
$
63,233 $
44,965 $
42,142
5,862
(13,214)
4,154
(3,053)
980
320
(1,121)
-
(281,086)
290,530
(5,147)
(767)
796
(427)
(971)
1,938
(6,267)
7,742
(288)
(4,454)
(638)
17,295
75,417
4,647
(9,457)
665
-
1,165
(328)
4,197
28
(290,800)
285,436
(3,159)
(2,250)
2,156
(27)
383
-
(6,225)
8,233
1,987
(35,290)
(4,887)
17,885
19,324
4,322
(11,500)
4,538
-
1,135
(269)
3,556
11
(65,691)
54,812
(524)
323
-
(56)
22
1,071
(6,339)
8,798
(850)
2,508
3,903
(2,911)
39,001
(918,668)
(12,321)
(487,898)
-
(125,900)
(55,247)
517,511
6,595
98,084
(81,707)
232,660
44,801
-
-
(5,458)
4,852
(37)
25,421
4,296
(83,971)
213,052
6,175
164,299
(73,262)
264,109
497
(1,476)
-
(5,960)
395
(4,500)
10,036
-
85,467
66,562
67,704
75,401
(166,811)
(75)
922
-
714
(6,137)
108
(10,215)
5,029
-
(147,945)
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
Years Ended June 30,
2020
2021
2019
596,583
283,726
76,081
(2,847,796) (3,508,146) (3,141,114)
2,345,000 3,390,000 3,252,000
10,270
(1,201)
(141,708)
(989)
423
(34,747)
19,015
(89,929)
128,864
38,935
(48,635)
(1,611)
(119,021)
(803)
373
(28,648)
(104,558)
(113,112)
180,967
67,855 $
(33,035)
(318)
(69,782)
(1,083)
-
(24,121)
37,241
142,032
38,935
180,967 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19,734 $
50,488 $
11,812 $
88,740 $
6,698
78,117
43,579 $
- $
567,816 $
523,926 $
- $
206 $
- $
- $
- $
537,732 $
- $
- $
17,243 $
17,758 $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net increase in deposits
Repayment of term FHLB advances
Proceeds from term FHLB advances
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings
Net decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes
Repurchase and cancellation of common stock of Kearny Financial Corp.
Cancellation of shares repurchased on vesting to pay taxes
Exercise of stock options
Dividends paid
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes, net of refunds
Interest
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfers from loans receivable to loans held-for-sale
Acquisition of other real estate owned in settlement of loans
Fair value of assets acquired, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
Fair value of liabilities assumed
In conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2019-04, the following qualifying held to
maturity securities were transferred to available for sale:
Debt securities transferred from held to maturity to available for sale
In conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2016-02, the following assets and liabilities
were recognized:
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Operating lease liabilities
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-12
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Consolidated Financial Statement Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”), its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Kearny Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, CJB Investment Corp. The Company conducts
its business principally through the Bank. Management prepared the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), including the elimination of all significant
inter-company accounts and transactions during consolidation.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of financial condition and revenues and
expenses for the periods then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Business of the Company and Subsidiaries
The Company’s primary business is the ownership and operation of the Bank. The Bank is principally engaged in the business of
attracting deposits from the general public and using those deposits, together with other funds, to originate or purchase loans for its
portfolio and invest in securities. Loans originated or purchased by the Bank generally include loans collateralized by residential
and commercial real estate augmented by secured and unsecured loans to businesses and consumers. The investment securities
purchased by the Bank generally include U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government and agency debentures, bank-
qualified municipal obligations, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations and subordinated debt.
At June 30, 2021, the Bank had one wholly owned subsidiary CJB Investment Corp. CJB Investment Corp was organized under
New Jersey law as a New Jersey Investment Company and remained active through the three-year period ended June 30, 2021.
Risks and Uncertainties
As previously disclosed, on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a global
pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, local, national and global
economic activity. The spread of the outbreak has caused significant disruptions to the U.S. economy, significant reductions in
the targeted federal funds rate and has disrupted banking and other financial activity in the areas in which the Company
operates.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted to, among other
provisions, provide emergency assistance for individuals, families and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. On
December 27, 2020, the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act, was enacted as part of an omnibus spending bill for the 2021
federal fiscal year, included provisions intended to provide additional aid to those impacted by the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted certain industries and geographies in which our clients operate and could
impact their ability to repay their obligations to us. Given its ongoing and dynamic nature, it is difficult to predict the full impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business of the Company, its clients, employees and third-party service providers. The extent
of such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including if the coronavirus can continue to be
controlled and abated and if and how the economy may remain open. Additionally, the responses of various governmental and
nongovernmental authorities to curtail business and consumer activities in an effort to mitigate the pandemic may have material
long-term effects on the Company and its clients which are difficult to quantify in the near-term or long-term.
It is possible that estimates made in the financial statements could be materially and adversely impacted as a result of these
conditions, including estimates regarding expected credit losses on loans receivable, impairment of investment securities and
impairment of goodwill. Although the Company continues to operate while taking steps to ensure the safety of employees and
clients, COVID-19 could also potentially create widespread business continuity issues for the Company.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the statement of financial condition date of June
30, 2021, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation
was conducted through the date this document was filed.
F-13
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, deposits with other financial institutions with maturities fewer than 90 days, and federal
funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial
institutions and borrowings with original maturities fewer than 90 days.
Securities
The Company classifies its investment securities as either available for sale or held to maturity. The Company does not use or
maintain a trading account. Investment securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are
classified as held to maturity and reported at amortized cost. Investment securities not classified as held to maturity are
classified as available for sale and reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes,
reported in the accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) component of stockholders’ equity.
Premiums on callable securities are amortized to the earliest call date whereas discounts on such securities are accreted to the
maturity date utilizing the level-yield method. Premiums and discounts on all other securities are generally amortized or
accreted to the maturity date utilizing the level-yield method taking into consideration the impact of principal amortization and
prepayments, as applicable. Gain or loss on sales of securities is based on the specific identification method.
Effective July 1, 2020, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 326 and modified its accounting policy for the assessment
of available for sale securities for impairment. Under ASC 326, for available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position,
the Company first assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more than likely than not that it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s
amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For securities available for sale that do not meet the above
criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this
assessment, the Company considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating by a
rating agency, and adverse conditions related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss
exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the
security. If the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists
and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the
amortized cost. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company elected the practical expedient of zero loss estimates for securities issued by
U.S. government entities and agencies. These securities are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government,
are highly rate by major agencies and have a long history of no credit losses.
Under ASC 326, changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for, or reversal of, credit loss expense.
Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of an available for sale security is
confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.
Prior to July 1, 2020, the accounting policy on the assessment of available for sale securities for impairment was based on an
other-than-temporary assessment. The Company considered other-than-temporary
impairments based upon several
considerations. First, other-than-temporary impairments on securities that the Company intends to sell, or will, more likely than
not, be required to sell prior to the full recovery of their fair value to a level equal to or exceeding their amortized cost, are
recognized in earnings. If neither of these conditions regarding the likelihood of the securities’ sale are applicable, then the
other-than-temporary impairment is bifurcated into credit and non-credit components. A credit impairment generally represents
the amount by which the present value of the cash flows that are expected to be collected on an investment security fall below
its amortized cost. A non-credit impairment represents the remaining portion of the impairment not otherwise designated as
credit-related. The Company recognized credit-related other-than-temporary impairments in earnings. Non-credit other-than-
temporary impairments on investment securities are recognized in OCI.
F-14
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company and its subsidiaries to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash
and cash equivalents, investment securities and loans receivable. Cash and cash equivalents include deposits placed in other
financial institutions.
Securities include concentrations of investments backed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government sponsored
enterprises (“GSEs”), including the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”). Additional concentration risk
exists in the Company’s municipal and corporate obligations, asset-backed securities and collateralized loan obligations.
The Company’s lending activity is primarily concentrated in loans collateralized by real estate in the states of New Jersey and
New York. As a result, credit risk is broadly dependent on the real estate market and general economic conditions in these
states. Additionally, the Company’s lending policies limit the amount of credit extended to any single borrower and their related
interests thereby limiting the concentration of credit risk to any single borrower.
Loans Receivable
Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are
reported at unpaid principal balances, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs, purchase discounts and premiums,
purchase accounting fair value adjustments and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal
balance. Certain direct loan origination costs, net of loan origination fees, are deferred and amortized, using the level-yield
method, as an adjustment of yield over the contractual lives of the related loans. Unearned premiums and discounts are
amortized or accreted utilizing the level-yield method over the contractual lives of the related loans.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, as determined on an aggregate basis. Net unrealized
losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance through a charge to earnings. Premiums and discounts and origination
fees and costs on loans held-for-sale are deferred and recognized as a component of the gain or loss on sale. Gains and losses on
sales of loans held-for-sale are recognized on settlement dates and are determined by the difference between the sale proceeds
and the carrying value of the loans. These transactions are accounted for as sales based on satisfaction of the criteria for such
accounting which provide that, as transferor, control over the loans have been surrendered.
Past Due Loans
A loan’s past due status is generally determined based upon its principal and interest payment (“P&I”) delinquency status in
conjunction with its past maturity status, where applicable. A loan’s P&I delinquency status is based upon the number of
calendar days between the date of the earliest P&I payment due and the as of measurement date. A loan’s past maturity status,
where applicable, is based upon the number of calendar days between a loan’s contractual maturity date and the as of
measurement date. Based upon the larger of these criteria, loans are categorized into the following past due tiers for financial
statement reporting and disclosure purposes: Current (including 1-29 days), 30-59 days, 60-89 days and 90 or more days.
Nonaccrual Loans
Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractual payments become 90 or more days past due or when the
Company does not expect to receive all P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement,
regardless of past due status. Loans that become 90 day past due, but are well secured and in the process of collection, may remain
on accrual status. Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when all payments due are brought current and the
Company expects to receive all remaining P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
Payments received in cash on nonaccrual loans, including both the principal and interest portions of those payments, are
generally applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan.
F-15
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Classification of Assets
In compliance with the regulatory guidelines, the Company’s loan review system includes an evaluation process through which
certain loans exhibiting adverse credit quality characteristics are classified as Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss.
An asset is classified as Substandard if it is inadequately protected by the paying capacity and net worth of the obligor or the
collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution
will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as Doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in
those classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full
highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values. Assets, or portions thereof,
classified as Loss are considered uncollectible or of so little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted.
Assets which do not currently expose the Company to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant an adverse classification but have
some credit deficiencies or other potential weaknesses are designated as Special Mention by management. Adversely classified
assets together with those rated as Special Mention, are generally referred to as Classified Assets. Non-classified assets are
internally rated within one of four Pass categories or as Watch with the latter denoting a potential deficiency or concern that
warrants increased oversight or tracking by management until remediated.
Management generally performs a classification of assets review, including the regulatory classification of assets, on an ongoing
basis. The results of the classification of assets review are validated by the Company’s third party loan review firm during their
quarterly independent review. In the event of a difference in rating or classification between those assigned by the internal and
external resources, the Company will generally utilize the more critical or conservative rating or classification. Final loan ratings
and regulatory classifications are presented monthly to the Board of Directors and are reviewed by regulators during the
examination process.
Acquired Loans
Effective July 1, 2020, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 326 and modified its accounting policy for loans acquired
through acquisitions, as further described below.
In accordance with accounting guidance in effect prior to adoption of ASC 326, loans acquired through acquisitions were
recorded at fair value with no carryover of the related allowance for credit losses. In determining the fair value of the loans
involves estimating the amount and timing of principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and
discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest. The excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair
value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The
difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is
referred to as the nonaccretable yield. The nonaccretable yield represents estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred
over the life of the loan. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows require us to evaluate the need for an allowance for
credit losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in the reversal of a corresponding amount of the
nonaccretable yield which we then reclassify as accretable yield that is recognized into interest income over the remaining life
of the loan using the interest method. Our evaluation of the amount of future cash flows that we expect to collect is performed in
a similar manner as that used to determine our allowance for credit losses. Charge-offs of the principal amount on acquired
loans would be first applied to the nonaccretable yield portion of the fair value adjustment.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses represents the estimated amount considered necessary to cover lifetime expected credit losses
inherent in financial assets at the balance sheet date. The measurement of expected credit losses is applicable to loans receivable
and securities measured at amortized cost. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposures such as loan commitments and
unused lines of credit. The allowance is established through a provision for credit losses that is charged against income. The
methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management because
of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the forecasted
economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for credit losses.
F-16
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The allowance for credit losses is reported separately as a contra-asset on the consolidated statement of financial condition. The
expected credit loss for unfunded lending commitments and unfunded loan commitments is reported on the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Condition in other liabilities while the provision for credit losses related to unfunded commitments is
reported in other non-interest expense.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans Receivable
The allowance for credit losses on loans is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the loan to present the net amount expected
to be collected. Expected losses are evaluated and calculated on a collective, or pooled, basis for those loans which share similar
risk characteristics. At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether loans within a pool continue to exhibit similar risk
characteristics. If the risk characteristics of a loan change, such that they are no longer similar to other loans in the pool, the
Company will evaluate the loan with a different pool of loans that share similar risk characteristics. If the loan does not share
risk characteristics with other loans, the Company will evaluate the loan on an individual basis. The Company evaluates the
pooling methodology at least annually. Loans are charged off against the allowance for credit losses when the Company
believes the balances to be uncollectible. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged off or
expected to be charged off.
The Company has chosen to segment its portfolio consistent with the manner in which it manages credit risk. Such segments
include multi-family, nonresidential mortgage, commercial business, construction, one- to four-family residential, home equity
and consumer. For most segments the Company calculates estimated credit losses using a probability of default and loss given
default methodology, the results of which are applied to the aggregated discounted cash flow of each individual loan within the
segment. The point in time probability of default and loss given default are then conditioned by macroeconomic scenarios to
incorporate reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount.
The Company estimates the allowance for credit losses on loans via a quantitative analysis which considers relevant available
information from internal and external sources related to past events and current conditions, as well as the incorporation of
reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company evaluates a variety of factors including third party economic forecasts,
industry trends and other available published economic information in arriving at its forecasts. After the reasonable and
supportable forecast period, the Company reverts, on a straight-line basis, to average historical losses. Expected credit losses are
estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term
excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable
expectation at the reporting date that a troubled debt restructuring will be executed with an individual borrower or the renewal
option is included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancelable by the
Company.
Also included in the allowance for credit losses on loans are qualitative reserves to cover losses that are expected but, in the
Company’s assessment, may not be adequately represented in the quantitative analysis or the forecasts described above. Factors
that the Company considers include changes in lending policies and procedures, business conditions, the nature and size of the
portfolio, portfolio concentrations, the volume and severity of past due loans and non-accrual loans, the effect of external factors
such as competition, legal and regulatory requirements, among others. Qualitative loss factors are applied to each portfolio
segment with the amounts judgmentally determined by the relative risk to the most severe loss periods identified in the historical
loan charge-offs of a peer group of similar-sized regional banks.
Individually Evaluated Loans
On a case-by-case basis, the Company may conclude that a loan should be evaluated on an individual basis based on its
disparate risk characteristics. When the Company determines that a loan no longer shares similar risk characteristics with other
loans in the portfolio, the allowance will be determined on an individual basis using the present value of expected cash flows or,
for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral as of the reporting date, less estimated selling costs, as applicable.
If the fair value of the collateral is less than the amortized cost basis of the loan, the Company will charge off the difference
between the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell at the reporting date and the amortized cost basis of the loan.
F-17
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Acquired Loans
Acquired loans are included in the Company's calculation of the allowance for credit losses. How the allowance on an acquired
loan is recorded depends on whether or not it has been classified as a Purchased Credit Deteriorated (“PCD”) loan. PCD loans
are loans acquired at a discount that is due, in part, to credit quality. PCD loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC
Subtopic 326-20 and are initially recorded at fair value as determined by the sum of the present value of expected future cash
flows and an allowance for credit losses at acquisition.
The allowance for PCD loans is recorded through a gross-up effect, while the allowance for acquired non-PCD loans is recorded
through provision expense, consistent with originated loans. Thus, the determination of which loans are PCD and non-PCD can
have a significant impact on the accounting for these loans. Subsequent to acquisition, the allowance for PCD loans will
generally follow the same estimation, provision and charge-off process as non-PCD acquired and originated loans.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
The Company is required to include unfunded commitments that are expected to be funded in the future within the allowance
calculation, other than those that are unconditionally cancelable. To arrive at that reserve, the reserve percentage for each
applicable segment is applied to the unused portion of the expected commitment balance and is multiplied by the expected
funding rate. To determine the expected funding rate, the Company uses a historical utilization rate for each segment. As noted
above, the allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments is included in other liabilities on the consolidated
statement of financial condition and the related credit expense is recorded in other non-interest expense in the consolidated
statements of income.
Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”)
A modification to the terms of a loan is generally considered a TDR if the Company grants a concession to a borrower, that it
would not otherwise consider, due to the borrower’s financial difficulties. In granting the concession, the Company’s general
objective is to obtain more cash or other value from the borrower or otherwise increase the probability of repayment.
A TDR may include, but is not necessarily limited to, the modification of loan terms such as the reduction of the loan’s stated
interest rate, extension of the maturity date and/or reduction or deferral of amounts owed under the terms of the loan agreement.
In measuring the impairment associated with restructured loans that qualify as TDRs, the Company compares the present value
of the cash flows that are expected to be received in accordance with the loan’s modified terms, discounted at the loan’s original
contractual interest rate, with the pre-modification carrying value to measure impairment.
All restructured loans that qualify as TDRs are placed on nonaccrual status for a period of no less than six months after
restructuring, irrespective of the borrower’s adherence to a TDR’s modified repayment terms during which time TDRs continue
to be adversely classified and reported as impaired. TDRs may be returned to accrual status and a non-adverse classification if
(1) the borrower has paid timely P&I payments in accordance with the terms of the restructured loan agreement for no less than
six consecutive months after restructuring, and (2) the Company expects to receive all P&I payments owed substantially in
accordance with the terms of the restructured loan agreement.
In March 2020, various regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), issued an interagency statement on loan modifications and reporting
for financial institutions working with customers affected by COVID-19. The interagency statement was effective immediately
and impacted accounting for loan modifications. The agencies confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term
modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief, are not to
be considered TDRs. This includes short-term modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extension of repayment
terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant. Provisions of the CARES Act largely mirrored the provisions of the
interagency statement, providing that modified loans were not to be considered TDRs if they were performing at December 31,
2019 and other considerations set forth in the interagency statements were met. Borrowers considered current are those that are
less than 30 days past due at the time a modification program is implemented or at December 31, 2019.
F-18
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
On December 27, 2020, the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act was signed into law. The $900 billion relief package
includes legislation that extends certain relief provisions of the CARES Act that were set to expire on December 31, 2020. This
new legislation extends this relief to the earlier of 60 days after the national emergency declared by the President is terminated
or January 1, 2022.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Office buildings, leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment are carried at cost, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Office buildings and furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases or lives of the assets, whichever is shorter.
Construction in progress primarily represents facilities under construction for future use in our business and includes all costs to
acquire land and construct buildings, as well as capitalized interest during the construction period. Interest is capitalized at the
Company’s average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
Other Real Estate Owned and Other Repossessed Assets
Properties and other assets acquired through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or repossession are carried at estimated fair
value, less estimated selling costs. The estimated fair value of real estate property and other repossessed assets is generally
based on independent appraisals. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated selling
costs, is charged to the allowance for credit losses. Thereafter, decreases in the properties’ estimated fair value are charged to
income along with any additional property maintenance and protection expenses incurred in owning the properties.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB system to hold restricted stock of its district FHLB according to a
predetermined formula. The restricted stock is carried at cost, less any applicable impairment. Both cash and stock dividends are
reported as income.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill arises from business combinations and is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration
transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and
determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if
events and circumstances exists that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company performed
its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Intangible assets with definite useful
lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset
with an indefinite life our audited consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.
In assessing impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether the existence of events or
circumstances leads to a determination that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of such events or circumstances, we determine it is not more-likely-than-not
that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then we would not be required to perform a quantitative
impairment test.
The annual quantitative assessment of goodwill for our single reporting unit was performed utilizing a discounted cash flow
analysis (“income approach”) and estimates of selected market information (“market approach”). The income approach
measures the fair value of an interest in a business by discounting expected future cash flows to present value. The market
approach takes into consideration fair values of comparable companies operating in similar lines of business that are
potentially subject
to similar economic and environmental factors and could be considered reasonable investment
alternatives. The results of the income approach were weighted at 50% while the results of the market approach were
weighted at 50%. The results of the annual quantitative impairment analysis indicated that the fair value exceeded the
carrying value for our single reporting unit.
F-19
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
No impairment charges were required to be recorded in the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 or 2019. If an impairment loss is
determined to exist in the future, such loss will be reflected as an expense in the consolidated statements of income in the period
in which the impairment loss is determined.
The balance of other intangible assets at June 30, 2021 and 2020 totaled $3.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, representing
the remaining unamortized balance of the core deposit intangibles ascribed to the value of deposits acquired by the Bank
through the acquisition of Central Jersey Bancorp in November 2010, Atlas Bank in June 2014, Clifton Bancorp Inc. in April
2018, and MSB Financial Corp. in July 2020.
Bank Owned Life Insurance
Bank owned life insurance is accounted for using the cash surrender value method and is recorded at its net realizable value.
The change in the net asset value is recorded as a component of non-interest income. A deferred liability has been recorded for
the estimated cost of postretirement life insurance benefits accruing to applicable employees and directors covered by an
endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over
transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company - put presumptively
beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2) the transferee obtains the right
(free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the
Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their
maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal income tax returns. Federal income taxes are allocated to each entity
based on their respective contributions to the taxable income of the consolidated income tax returns. Separate state income tax
returns are filed for the Company and its subsidiaries on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis as required by the
jurisdiction. The federal income tax rate of 21% was applicable for the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Federal and state income taxes have been provided on the basis of the Company’s income or loss as reported in accordance with
GAAP. The amounts reflected on the Company’s state and federal income tax returns differ from these provisions due
principally to temporary differences in the reporting of certain items for financial statement reporting and income tax reporting
purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences is accounted for as deferred taxes applicable to future periods. Deferred
income tax expense or benefit is determined by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. The
realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance provided for the full amount which is not more likely
than not to be realized.
The Company identified no significant income tax uncertainties through the evaluation of its income tax positions as of June 30,
2021 and 2020. Therefore, the Company has no unrecognized income tax benefits as of those dates. Our policy is to recognize
interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. The
Company recognized no material interest and penalties during the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019. The tax years
subject to examination by the taxing authorities are the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
F-20
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Retirement Plans
Pension expense is the net of service and interest cost, return on plan assets and amortization of gains and losses not
immediately recognized. Employee 401(k) and profit sharing plan expense is the amount of matching contributions. Deferred
compensation plan expense allocates the benefits over years of service.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of shareholders’ equity.
Compensation expense is based on the market price of shares as they are committed to be released to participant accounts.
Dividends on allocated and unallocated ESOP shares either reduce retained earnings or reduce debt and accrued interest as
determined by the ESOP Plan Administrator.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is divided into net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss)
includes items recorded in equity, such as unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, unrealized gains and losses
on derivatives, unrealized gains and losses on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity and amortization
related to post-retirement obligations. Comprehensive income is presented in a separate Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
Loss Contingencies
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when
the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe
there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters
of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before
considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. (See Note 17 -
Commitments for additional information).
Derivatives and Hedging
The Company utilizes derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swaps and caps to hedge its exposure to interest rate
risk in conjunction with its overall asset/liability management process. In accordance with accounting requirements, the
Company formally designates all of its hedging relationships as either fair value hedges, intended to offset the changes in the
value of certain financial instruments due to movements in interest rates, or cash flow hedges, intended to offset changes in the
cash flows of certain financial instruments due to movement in interest rates, and documents the strategy for undertaking the
hedge transactions, and its method of assessing ongoing effectiveness. The Company does not use derivative instruments for
speculative purposes.
All derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Financial Statements at their fair values. For
derivatives designated cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income and
subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For a
derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged
item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in current earnings.
Derivative instruments qualify for hedge accounting treatment only if they are designated as such on the date on which the
derivative contract is entered and are expected to be, and are, effective in substantially reducing interest rate risk arising from
the assets and liabilities identified as exposing the Company to risk. Those derivative financial instruments that do not meet the
hedging criteria discussed below would be classified as undesignated derivatives and would be recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded in income.
F-21
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The Company discontinues hedge accounting when (a) it determines that a derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes
in cash flows of a hedged item; (b) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (c) probability exists that the
forecasted transaction will no longer occur; or (d) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging
instrument is no longer appropriate. In all cases in which hedge accounting is discontinued and a derivative remains outstanding,
the Company will carry the derivative at fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements, recognizing changes in fair value
in current period income in the consolidated statement of income.
In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the Company takes into account the impact of collateral and master
netting agreements that allow it to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis, and to offset the
net derivative position with the related collateral when recognizing derivative assets and liabilities. As a result, the Company’s
Statements of Financial Condition could reflect derivative contracts with negative fair values included in derivative assets, and
contracts with positive fair values included in derivative liabilities.
The Company’s interest rate derivatives are comprised of interest rate swaps and caps hedging floating-rate and forecasted
issuances of fixed-rate liabilities and accounted for as cash flow hedges. The carrying value of interest rate derivatives is
included in the balance of other assets or other liabilities and comprises the remaining unamortized cost of interest rate caps and
the cumulative changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives. Such changes in fair value are offset against accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of deferred income tax.
In general, the cash flows received and/or exchanged with counterparties for those derivatives qualifying as interest rate hedges
are generally classified in the financial statements in the same category as the cash flows of the items being hedged.
Interest differentials paid or received under the swap agreements are reflected as adjustments to interest expense. The notional
amounts of the interest rate swaps are not exchanged and do not represent exposure to credit loss. In the event of default by a
counter party, the risk in these transactions is the cost of replacing the agreements at current market rates.
Net Income per Common Share (“EPS”)
Basic EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares actually outstanding adjusted for the Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) shares not yet committed to be released. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, such as outstanding stock options, were exercised or converted into
common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. Diluted EPS is
calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding to include the effect of contracts or
securities exercisable or which could be converted into common stock, if dilutive, using the treasury stock method. Shares
issued and reacquired during any period are weighted for the portion of the period they were outstanding.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully
disclosed in Note 18. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates,
credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in
assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect these estimates.
Operating Segments
Public companies are required to report certain financial information about significant revenue-producing segments of the
business for which such information is available and utilized by the chief operating decision makers. Substantially all of the
Company’s operations occur through the Bank and involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers. Management
makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of its banking operation, which constitutes the
Company’s only operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
F-22
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Stock Compensation Plans
Compensation expense related to stock options and non-vested stock awards is based on the fair value of the award on the
measurement date with expense recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award. The fair value of stock
options is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of non-vested stock awards is generally the closing
market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
Advertising and Marketing Expenses
The Company expenses advertising and marketing costs as incurred.
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2019-12, “Income taxes (Topic 740);
Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. ASU 2019-12 provides amendments intended to reduce the cost and complexity in
accounting for income taxes while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial
statements. ASU 2019-12 removes the following exceptions from ASC 740, Income Taxes: (i) exceptions to the incremental approach
for intraperiod tax allocation; (ii) exceptions to accounting for basis differences when a foreign subsidiary becomes an equity method
investment or a foreign equity method investment become a subsidiary; and (iii) exception in interim period income tax accounting for
year-to-date losses that exceed anticipated losses. ASU 2019-12 provides the following amendments that simplify and improve
guidance with Topic 740: (i) franchise taxes that are based partially on income; (ii) transactions that result in a step up in the tax basis
of goodwill; (iii) separate financial statements of legal entities that are not subject to tax; (iv) enacted changes in tax laws in interim
periods; and (v) employee stock ownership plans and investments in qualified affordable housing projects accounted for using the
equity method. For public business entities, the amendments in the ASU 2019-12 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU
on its consolidated financial statements.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In January 2021 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), issued ASU 2021-01 to clarify the scope of ASU 2020-04,
“Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting”. ASU 2020-04
provides temporary, optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships that
reference the London Interbank Offered Rate or another reference rate that is expected to be discontinued. The ASU addresses
questions about whether Topic 848 can be applied to derivative instruments that do not reference a rate that is expected to be
discontinued but that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is expected to be modified as a
result of reference rate reform, commonly referred to as the “discounting transition”. The amendments clarify that certain optional
expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 do apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The amendments in
ASU 2021-01 are effective immediately for all entities. The amendments do not apply to contract modifications made after December
31, 2022; new hedging relationships entered into after December 31, 2022; and existing hedging relationships evaluated for
effectiveness in periods after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as of December 31, 2022, that apply
certain optional expedients in which the accounting effects are recorded through the end of the hedging relationship, including periods
after December 31, 2022. The Company adopted ASU 2021-01 in January 2021, and its adoption did not have a significant impact on
the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.
F-23
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
On July 1, 2020 the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit
Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU replaced the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology that is
referred to as the CECL methodology. The measurement of expected credit losses under the CECL methodology is applicable to
financial assets measured at amortized cost including loan receivables and held to maturity debt securities. This ASU also applies to
off-balance exposures. In addition, this ASU made certain changes to the accounting for available for sale securities debt securities.
Credit losses are required to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down on available for sale debt securities management
does not intend to sell or believes that it is more likely than not they will be required to sell. The Company adopted Topic 326 and all
its related updates on July 1, 2020, using the modified retrospective approach for financial assets measured at amortized cost. Results
for reporting periods after July 1, 2020 are presented in accordance to the guidance under Topic 326 while prior period amounts
continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. Upon adoption the Company recorded a cumulative effect
adjustment that reduced stockholders’ equity by $14.2 million, net of tax. Additional information regarding the adoption of ASU
2016-13 is presented in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. This ASU simplifies subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the impairment test while retaining
the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary.
The ASU also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative
assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment
assessment applies to all reporting units. For public entities, ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2019 with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment testing dates beginning after January 1, 2017. The
Company is applying the amendments of ASU 2017-04 prospectively for goodwill impairment testing conducted after July 1, 2020.
Note 3 – Business Combination
On July 10, 2020, the Company completed its acquisition of MSB, and its subsidiary Millington Bank. In accordance with the merger
agreement, approximately $9.8 million in cash and 5,853,811 shares of Company common stock were distributed to former MSB
shareholders in exchange for their shares of MSB common stock.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Management
engaged a third-party specialist to develop the fair value estimate of certain MSB’s assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. The
assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were recorded at their fair values as of July 10, 2020 based on management’s best
estimate using the information available as of the merger date. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in the
recognition of bargain purchase gain of $3.1 million and a core deposit intangible of $690,000. During the year ended June 30, 2021
the Company completed all MSB tax returns and determined that there were no material adjustments to the balance of deferred income
tax assets or bargain purchase gain associated with the MSB acquisition.
F-24
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 – Business Combination (continued)
The Company recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed through the merger at fair value as summarized in the
following table:
Cash paid for acquisition
Value of stock issued
Total purchase price
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Loans receivable
Allowance for loan losses
Premises and equipment
FHLB stock
Accrued interest receivable
Core deposit intangibles
Bank owned life insurance
Deferred income taxes, net
Other assets
Total assets acquired
Deposits
FHLB borrowings
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes
Other liabilities
Total liabilities assumed
Net assets acquired
Bargain purchase gain
Explanation of certain fair value related adjustments:
As Recorded
by MSB
Fair Value
Adjustments
(In Thousands)
As Recorded
at Acquisition
$
$
$
$
14,126
4,000
537,589
(6,037)
7,698
3,345
1,701
-
14,663
1,729
4,830
583,644
458,392
62,900
794
810
522,896
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
(510) (a)
(7,345) (b)
6,037 (c)
(3,221) (d)
-
-
690 (e)
-
2,152 (f)
495 (g)
$
(1,702)
1,786 (h) $
-
-
(756) (i)
$
1,030
9,830
45,133
54,963
14,126
3,490
530,244
-
4,477
3,345
1,701
690
14,663
3,881
5,325
581,942
460,178
62,900
794
54
523,926
$
$
58,016
(3,053)
Represents the fair value adjustments on investment securities.
(a)
(b) Represents the fair value adjustments on the net book value of loans, which includes an interest rate mark and credit mark
adjustment and the reversal of deferred fees/costs and premiums.
Represents the elimination of MSB’s allowance for loan losses.
(c)
(d) Represents the fair value adjustments to reflect the fair value of land and buildings and premises and equipment, which will be
(e)
(f)
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets.
Represents the intangible assets recorded to reflect the fair value of core deposits. The core deposit asset was recorded as an
identifiable intangible asset and will be amortized on an accelerated basis over the estimated average life of the deposit base.
Represents an adjustment to net deferred tax assets resulting from the fair value adjustments related to the acquired assets,
liabilities assumed and identifiable intangible assets recorded.
(g) Represents an adjustment to other assets acquired.
(h) Represents fair value adjustments on time deposits, which will be treated as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining
term of the time deposits.
Represents an adjustment to other liabilities assumed.
(i)
F-25
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 - Business Combination (continued)
The fair value of loans acquired from MSB was estimated using cash flow projections based on the remaining maturity and repricing
terms. Cash flows were adjusted by estimating future credit losses and the rate of prepayments. Projected monthly cash flows were
then discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted market rate for similar loans. There was no carryover of MSB’s allowance for
loan losses associated with the loans that were acquired. For information regarding purchased loans which have been determined to be
PCD, refer to Note 5, Loans Receivable.
The core deposit intangible asset recognized is being amortized over its estimated useful life of approximately 10 years utilizing the
sum-of-the-years digits method.
The fair value of retail demand and interest bearing deposit accounts was assumed to approximate the carrying value as these accounts
have no stated maturity and are payable on demand. The fair value of time deposits was estimated by discounting the contractual
future cash flows using market rates offered for time deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Merger-related expenses were recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a component of non-interest expense and include
costs relating to the Company’s acquisition of MSB, as described above. These charges represent one-time costs associated with
acquisition activities and are expensed as incurred. Direct acquisition and other charges were recorded in merger-related expense on
the consolidated statements of income. Direct acquisition and other charges incurred in connection with the MSB merger totaled $4.3
million and $951,000 for the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Note 4 - Securities
At June 30, 2021, there was no allowance for credit losses on available for sale securities. The following tables present the amortized
cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair values for available for sale securities and the amortized cost, gross
unrecognized gains and losses and estimated fair values for held to maturity securities as of the dates indicated.
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
June 30, 2021
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Thousands)
Allowance for
Credit Losses
Fair
Value
Available for sale:
Debt securities:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Total debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations (1)
Residential pass-through securities (1)
Commercial pass-through securities (1)
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
33,800 $
803 $
- $
240,217
189,873
155,622
619,512
13,420
744,196
289,725
1,047,341
2,835
177
2,802
6,617
319
7,443
5,738
13,500
63
170
73
306
-
7,148
2,652
9,800
- $
-
-
-
-
34,603
242,989
189,880
158,351
625,823
-
-
-
-
13,739
744,491
292,811
1,051,041
Total securities available for sale
$ 1,666,853 $
20,117 $
10,106 $
- $ 1,676,864
(1)
Government-sponsored enterprises.
F-26
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 4 – Securities (continued)
Available for sale:
Debt securities:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Trust preferred securities
Total debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations (1)
Residential pass-through securities (1)
Commercial pass-through securities (1)
Total mortgage-backed securities
Amortized
Cost
June 30, 2020
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Thousands)
Fair
Value
$
52,843 $
177,413
198,619
142,942
2,967
574,784
1,211 $
-
-
1,267
-
2,478
-
4,966
4,831
570
340
10,707
54,054
172,447
193,788
143,639
2,627
566,555
30,043
543,819
214,575
788,437
860
18,135
11,716
30,711
-
-
-
-
30,903
561,954
226,291
819,148
Total securities available for sale
$ 1,363,221 $
33,189 $
10,707 $ 1,385,703
(1)
Government-sponsored enterprises.
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrecognized
Gains
June 30, 2021
Gross
Unrecognized
Losses
(In Thousands)
Allowance for
Credit Losses
Fair
Value
Held to maturity:
Debt securities:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
$
Total debt securities
25,824 $
25,824
1,204 $
1,204
Mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial pass-through securities (1)
Total mortgage-backed securities
12,314
12,314
268
268
- $
-
-
-
- $
-
27,028
27,028
- $
-
12,582
12,582
Total securities held to maturity
$
38,138 $
1,472 $
- $
- $
39,610
Held to maturity:
Debt securities:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Total debt securities
Total securities held to maturity
Amortized
Cost
June 30, 2020
Gross
Unrecognized
Gains
Gross
Unrecognized
Losses
(In Thousands)
Fair
Value
32,556 $
32,556
1,513 $
1,513
- $
-
34,069
34,069
32,556 $
1,513 $
- $
34,069
$
$
F-27
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 4 – Securities (continued)
Excluding the balances of mortgage-backed securities, the following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair values of
debt securities available for sale and held to maturity, by contractual maturity, at June 30, 2021:
Debt securities:
Due in one year or less
Due after one year through five years
Due after five years through ten years
Due after ten years
Total
June 30, 2021
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
(In Thousands)
$
$
5,245 $
33,961
366,936
239,194
645,336 $
5,286
35,087
370,716
241,762
652,851
Sales of securities available for sale were as follows for the periods presented below:
Available for sale securities sold:
Proceeds from sales of securities
Gross realized gains
Gross realized losses
Net gain (loss) on sales of securities
June 30,
2021
June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
June 30,
2019
$
98,084 $
164,299 $
75,401
$
$
1,196 $
(470)
726 $
2,363 $
(145)
2,218 $
190
(513)
(323)
Calls of securities available for sale resulted in gross gains of $41,000 and $32,000 during the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2019 there were no gains or losses recorded on calls of securities available for sale.
During the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, there were no gains or losses recorded on sales and calls of securities held to
maturity.
The carrying value of securities pledged for borrowings at the FHLB and other institutions, and securities pledged for public funds and
other purposes, were as follows as of the dates presented below:
Securities pledged:
Pledged for borrowings at the FHLB of New York
Pledged to secure public funds on deposit
Pledged for potential borrowings at the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York
Pledged as collateral for depositor sweep accounts
Total carrying value of securities pledged
June 30,
2021
June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
$
$
170,120 $
137,778
274,076
-
581,974 $
155,288
19,944
366,482
7,830
549,544
F-28
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 4 – Securities (continued)
The following tables present the gross unrealized losses on securities and the estimated fair value of the related securities, aggregated
by investment category and length of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position within the available for
sale portfolio at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
June 30, 2021
Less than 12 Months
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
12 Months or More
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of
Securities
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Securities Available for Sale:
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Commercial pass-through
securities
Residential pass-through
securities
$ 12,159 $
36,741
15,952
- $
63 $
9
73
58,605
-
145,055
2,652
424,112
7,148
-
-
-
161
-
-
-
2 $ 12,159 $
95,346
8
15,952
4
63
170
73
7
145,055
2,652
10
424,112
7,148
Total
$ 634,019 $
9,945 $ 58,605 $
161
31 $ 692,624 $
10,106
June 30, 2020
Less than 12 Months
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
12 Months or More
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of
Securities
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Securities Available for Sale:
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Trust preferred securities
$ 146,494 $
71,282
24,764
-
3,962 $ 25,954 $
1,245
236
-
122,506
39,651
2,626
1,004
3,586
334
340
16 $ 172,448 $
19
8
2
193,788
64,415
2,626
4,966
4,831
570
340
Total
$ 242,540 $
5,443 $ 190,737 $
5,264
45 $ 433,277 $
10,707
At June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, there were no held to maturity securities with unrecognized losses.
Available for sale securities are evaluated to determine if a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis has resulted from a
credit loss or other factors. An impairment related to credit factors would be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. The
allowance is limited to the amount by which the security’s amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value. An impairment that has not
been recorded through an allowance for credit losses shall be recorded through other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.
Investment securities will be written down to fair value through the consolidated statement of income when management intends to
sell, or may be required to sell, the securities before they recover in value. The issuers of these securities continue to make timely
principal and interest payments and none of these securities were past due or were placed in nonaccrual status at June 30, 2021.
Management believes that the unrealized losses on these securities are a function of changes in market interest rates and credit
spreads, not changes in credit quality. Therefore, no allowance for credit losses was recorded at June 30, 2021.
At June 30, 2021, the held to maturity securities portfolio consisted of one agency commercial mortgage-backed security and
municipal bonds. The commercial mortgage-backed security is issued by a U.S. government agency and is either explicitly or
implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government. The municipal bonds in the portfolio are highly rated by major rating agencies and have
a long history of no credit losses. None of the securities in the Company’s held to maturity portfolio were in an unrealized loss
position at June 30, 2021. The Company regularly monitors the municipal bond sector of the market and reviews collectability
including such factors as the financial condition of the issuers as well as credit ratings in effect as of the reporting period.
F-29
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family mortgage
Nonresidential mortgage
Commercial business (1)
Construction
Total commercial loans
One- to four-family residential mortgage
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans
Other consumer
Total consumer loans
Total loans
Unaccreted yield adjustments
June 30,
2021
June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
$
2,039,260 $
1,079,444
168,951
93,804
3,381,459
2,059,568
960,853
138,788
20,961
3,180,170
1,447,721
1,273,022
47,871
3,259
51,130
82,920
3,991
86,911
4,880,310
4,540,103
(28,916)
(41,706)
Total loans receivable, net of yield adjustments
$
4,851,394 $
4,498,397
(1)
Includes Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans of $10.2 million and $69.0 million as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively.
The Bank has granted loans to officers and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries and to their associates. As of June 30, 2021
and 2020 such loans totaled approximately $1.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2021 the Bank
granted one new loan to related parties totaling $478,000. During the year ended June 30, 2020 the Bank granted two new loans to
related parties totaling $1.0 million.
F-30
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
Past Due Loans
Past due status is based on the contractual payment terms of the loans. The following tables present the payment status of past due
loans as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, by loan segment:
June 30, 2021
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$2,023,166 $ 1,046,553 $
168,550 $
93,804 $ 1,439,501 $ 47,828 $
3,258 $4,822,660
-
-
16,094
16,094
-
-
32,891
32,891
-
-
401
401
-
-
-
-
382
2,734
5,104
8,220
6
5
32
43
1
-
-
1
389
2,739
54,522
57,650
Current
Past due:
30-59 days
60-89 days
90 days and over
Total past due
Total loans
$2,039,260 $ 1,079,444 $
168,951 $
93,804 $ 1,447,721 $ 47,871 $
3,259 $4,880,310
June 30, 2020
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$2,059,568 $
941,714 $
138,439 $
20,961 $ 1,264,267 $ 82,358 $
3,981 $4,511,288
-
-
-
-
-
14,478
4,661
19,139
-
-
349
349
-
-
-
-
3,211
1,038
4,506
8,755
169
13
380
562
-
5
5
10
3,380
15,534
9,901
28,815
Current
Past due:
30-59 days
60-89 days
90 days and over
Total past due
Total loans
$2,059,568 $
960,853 $
138,788 $
20,961 $ 1,273,022 $ 82,920 $
3,991 $4,540,103
Nonperforming Loans
Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractual payments become 90 or more days past due or when the Company
does not expect to receive all principal and interest payments (“P&I”) owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan
agreement, regardless of past due status. Loans that become 90 days past due, but are well secured and in the process of collection,
may remain on accrual status. Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when all payments due are brought current and
we expect to receive all remaining P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Payments
received in cash on nonaccrual loans, including both the principal and interest portions of those payments, are generally applied to
reduce the carrying value of the loan. The Company did not recognize interest income on non-accrual loans during the three years
ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
F-31
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
The following tables present information relating to the Company’s nonperforming loans as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
June 30, 2021
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$2,020,734 $ 1,042,257 $
168,039 $
91,576 $ 1,428,551 $ 46,127 $
3,259 $4,800,543
Performing
Nonperforming:
90 days and over past due accruing
Nonaccrual loans with
allowance for credit losses
Nonaccrual loans with no
allowance for credit losses
Total nonperforming
-
-
-
8,300
12,612
236
-
-
-
-
-
-
7,422
452
-
29,022
10,226
18,526
24,575
37,187
676
912
2,228
2,228
11,748
19,170
1,292
1,744
-
-
50,745
79,767
Total loans
$2,039,260 $ 1,079,444 $
168,951 $
93,804 $ 1,447,721 $ 47,871 $
3,259 $4,880,310
June 30, 2020
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$2,056,606 $
936,917 $
138,196 $
20,961 $ 1,264,663 $ 82,078 $
3,986 $4,503,407
Performing
Nonperforming:
90 days and over past due accruing
Nonaccrual
Total nonperforming
-
2,962
2,962
-
23,936
23,936
-
592
592
-
-
-
-
8,359
8,359
-
842
842
5
-
5
5
36,691
36,696
Total loans
$2,059,568 $
960,853 $
138,788 $
20,961 $ 1,273,022 $ 82,920 $
3,991 $4,540,103
Troubled Debt Restructurings
On a case-by-case basis, the Company may agree to modify the contractual terms of a loan to assist a borrower who may be
experiencing financial difficulty, as well as to preserve the Company’s position in the loan. If the borrower is experiencing financial
difficulties and a concession has been made at the time of such modification, the loan is classified as a TDR. The Company had TDRs
totaling $17.8 million and $21.5 million as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively. The allowance for credit losses
associated with the TDRs presented in the tables below totaled $256,000 and $8,000 as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020,
respectively. As of June 30, 2021, there were no significant commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans had been
restructured in a TDR.
F-32
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
The following tables present total TDR loans at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
Accrual
# of Loans
Amount
June 30, 2021
Non-accrual
# of Loans
Amount
(Dollars In Thousands)
Total
# of Loans
Amount
- $
1
3
-
4
-
105
3,755
-
3,860
1 $
6
6
1
14
2,896
2,275
693
2,228
8,092
1 $
7
9
1
18
2,896
2,380
4,448
2,228
11,952
18
2,216
20
3,405
38
5,621
4
26 $
159
6,235
3
37 $
68
11,565
7
63 $
227
17,800
Accrual
# of Loans
Amount
June 30, 2020
Non-accrual
# of Loans
Amount
(Dollars In Thousands)
Total
# of Loans
Amount
- $
1
5
6
-
112
5,179
5,291
1 $
9
6
16
2,962
5,442
446
8,850
1 $
10
11
22
2,962
5,554
5,625
14,141
14
2,407
20
3,811
34
6,218
12
32 $
715
8,413
2
38 $
448
13,109
14
70 $
1,163
21,522
Commercial loans:
Multi-family mortgage loans
Nonresidential mortgage
Commercial business
Construction
Total commercial loans
One- to four-family residential
mortgage
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans
Total
Commercial loans:
Multi-family mortgage loans
Nonresidential mortgage
Commercial business
Total commercial loans
One- to four-family residential
mortgage
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans
Total
F-33
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
The following table presents information regarding the restructuring of the Company’s troubled debts during years ended June 30,
2021 and 2020:
Year Ended June 30, 2021
Year Ended June 30, 2020
Pre-
modification
Recorded
Investment
Post-
modification
Recorded
Investment
# of Loans
# of Loans
Pre-
modification
Recorded
Investment
Post-
modification
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
-
-
-
4
3
7 $
$
-
-
-
877
70
947 $
-
-
-
881
70
951
$
1
1
5
5
1
13 $
$
3,062
521
4,349
1,285
82
9,299 $
2,996
517
4,415
1,220
81
9,229
Multi-family mortgage
Nonresidential mortgage
Commercial business
One- to four-family residential
mortgage
Home equity loans
Total
During the years ended June 30, 2021 and June 30 2020, there were no charge-offs related to TDRs. During the year ended June 30,
2021 there were no troubled debt restructuring defaults. During the year ended June 30, 2020, there was one troubled debt
restructuring default totaling $514,000.
Loan modifications generally involve a reduction in interest rates and/or extension of maturity dates and also may include step up
interest rates in their modified terms which will impact their weighted average yield in the future. The loans which qualified as TDRs
during the year ended June 30, 2021, capitalized prior past due amounts and modified the loan’s repayment terms.
In March 2020, various regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), issued an interagency statement on loan modifications and reporting for
financial institutions working with customers affected by COVID-19. The interagency statement was effective immediately and
impacted accounting for loan modifications. The agencies confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications made
on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief, are not to be considered TDRs. This
includes short-term modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extension of repayment terms, or other delays in payment
that are insignificant. Provisions of the CARES Act largely mirrored the provisions of the interagency statement, providing that
modified loans were not to be considered TDRs if they were performing at December 31, 2019 and other considerations set forth in
the interagency statements were met. Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due at the time a
modification program is implemented or at December 31, 2019.
On December 27, 2020, the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act was signed into law. The $900 billion relief package includes
legislation that extends certain relief provisions of the CARES Act that were set to expire on December 31, 2020. This legislation
extends this relief to the earlier of 60 days after the national emergency declared by the President is terminated or January 1, 2022. As
of June 30, 2021, the Company had 10 non-TDR loan modifications granted under the CARES Act totaling approximately $5.6
million.
F-34
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
Individually Analyzed Loans
Effective July 1, 2020, individually analyzed loans include loans which do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans.
TDR’s will generally be evaluated for individual impairment, however, after a period of sustained repayment performance which
permits the credit to be returned to accrual status, a TDR would generally be removed from individual impairment analysis and
returned to its corresponding pool. As of June 30, 2021, the carrying value of individually analyzed loans and loans acquired with
deteriorated credit quality that were individually evaluated totaled $79.8 million, of which $59.2 million were considered collateral
dependent.
For collateral dependent loans where management has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower
is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the
collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, and the amortized
cost basis of the loan as of the measurement date. See Note 18 for additional disclosure regarding fair value of individually analyzed
collateral dependent loans.
The following table presents the carrying value of collateral dependent individually analyzed loans:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family mortgage
Nonresidential mortgage (1)
Commercial business (2)
Construction
Total commercial loans
One- to four-family residential
mortgage (3)
Consumer loans:
Home equity loans (3)
Total
(1)
(2)
(3)
Secured by income-producing nonresidential property.
Secured by business assets.
Secured by one- to four-family residential properties.
June 30, 2021
Carrying Value
Related Allowance
(In Thousands)
$
$
18,526
32,891
183
-
51,600
7,612
31
$
59,243
$
1,368
4,724
-
-
6,092
420
-
6,512
F-35
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
The following table presents, under previously applicable GAAP, loans individually evaluated for impairment by portfolio segment as
of June 30, 2020:
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
June 30, 2020
$2,056,606 $
936,805 $
132,999 $
20,961 $ 1,262,256 $ 81,363 $
3,991 $4,494,981
2,962
22,516
5,622
-
10,659
1,557
-
43,316
-
-
-
1,532
(41)
167
(47)
1,491
120
-
-
-
107
(1)
106
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,806
(89)
1,717
2,962
24,048
5,789
-
10,766
1,557
-
45,122
Carrying value of impaired loans:
Non-impaired loans
Impaired loans:
Impaired loans with no allowance
for impairment
Impaired loans with allowance
for impairment:
Recorded investment
Allowance for impairment
Balance of impaired loans net
of allowance for impairment
Total impaired loans, excluding
allowance for impairment:
Total loans
$2,059,568 $
960,853 $
138,788 $
20,961 $ 1,273,022 $ 82,920 $
3,991 $4,540,103
Unpaid principal balance
of impaired loans:
Total impaired loans
Credit Quality Indicators
$
3,544 $
25,898 $
8,778 $
73 $
12,908 $ 1,950 $
- $
53,151
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt
such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic
trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually to classify the loans as to credit risk. The Company uses the
following definitions for risk ratings:
Pass – Loans that are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor (or guarantors, if any) or by the
fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner.
Special Mention – Loans which do not currently expose the Company to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant an adverse
classification but have some credit deficiencies or other potential weaknesses.
Substandard – Loans which are inadequately protected by the paying capacity and net worth of the obligor or the collateral
pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some
loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful – Loans which have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic
that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently
existing facts, conditions and values.
Loss – Loans which considered uncollectible or of so little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted.
F-36
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
The following table presents the risk category of loans as of June 30, 2021 by loan segment and vintage year:
Term Loans by Origination Year for Fiscal Years ended June 30,
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
(In Thousands)
Prior
Revolving
Loans
Total
$ 281,402 $ 257,970 $ 374,871 $ 341,304 $ 343,370 $ 374,909 $
-
-
-
281,402
99,602
-
743
-
-
-
-
257,970
77,146
-
-
-
26,974
-
-
401,845
56,435
23,520
-
-
5,079
2,896
-
349,279
64,616
4,146
4,934
-
4,834
13,198
-
361,402
254,940
8,801
20,602
-
1,054
11,399
-
387,362
441,696
4,513
11,600
-
- $ 1,973,826
37,941
-
27,493
-
-
-
2,039,260
-
6,150
-
-
-
1,000,585
40,980
37,879
-
100,345
77,146
79,955
73,696
284,343
457,809
6,150
1,079,444
44,514
-
41
-
44,555
40,332
-
-
-
40,332
18,988
-
76
-
19,064
17,404
-
-
-
17,404
560,543
-
-
-
560,543
124,606
-
1,040
-
125,646
834
-
-
-
834
550
-
-
-
550
2,508
-
-
-
2,508
517
-
-
-
517
4,701
-
160
-
4,861
11,203
-
-
-
11,203
69,917
1,233
671
-
71,821
4,585
-
-
-
4,585
633
-
-
-
633
12,654
2,304
1,474
-
16,432
13,860
-
-
-
13,860
74,754
-
511
-
75,265
2,778
-
-
-
2,778
256
-
-
-
256
3,322
945
132
-
4,399
1,641
-
-
-
1,641
12,892
12
189
420
13,513
1,382
-
2,247
-
3,629
119,238
-
1,468
-
120,706
472,587
712
20,066
-
493,365
2,241
-
11
-
2,252
127
-
-
-
127
7,798
393
1,935
-
10,126
1,044
-
-
-
1,044
$ 1,028,561 $ 500,255 $ 574,903 $ 531,566 $ 774,870 $ 1,366,848 $
65,657
461
-
9
66,127
5,735
-
-
-
5,735
162,728
3,722
2,072
429
168,951
91,557
-
2,247
-
93,804
375
-
-
-
375
1,422,020
1,945
23,756
-
1,447,721
24,788
-
-
-
24,788
45,532
393
1,946
-
47,871
44
-
1
87
132
3,171
-
1
87
3,259
103,307 $ 4,880,310
Multi-family mortgage:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total multi-family mortgage
Non-residential mortgage:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total non-residential
mortgage
Commercial business:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total commercial business
Construction loans:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total construction loans
Residential mortgage:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total residential mortgage
Home equity loans:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total home equity loans
Other consumer loans
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Other consumer loans
Total loans
F-37
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
The following table presents, under previously applicable GAAP, the risk category of loans as of June 30, 2020 by loan segment:
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
June 30, 2020
Pass
$2,055,520 $
932,202 $
132,818 $
20,961 $ 1,258,246 $ 81,120 $
3,979 $4,484,846
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
1,086
2,962
-
4,373
24,278
-
2,585
3,385
-
-
-
-
981
13,795
-
157
1,643
-
5
6
1
9,187
46,069
1
Total loans
$2,059,568 $
960,853 $
138,788 $
20,961 $ 1,273,022 $ 82,920 $
3,991 $4,540,103
Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans
Loans acquired in a business combination after July 1, 2020 are recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 326, after which acquired
loans are separated into two types. PCD loans are acquired loans that, as of the acquisition date, have experienced a more-than-
insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. Non-PCD loans are acquired loans that have experienced no or
insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. To distinguish between the two types of acquired loans, the Company
evaluates risk characteristics that have been determined to be indicators of deteriorated credit quality. The determining criteria may
involve loan specific characteristics such as payment status, debt service coverage or other changes in creditworthiness since the loan
was originated, while others are relevant to recent economic conditions, such as borrowers in industries impacted by the pandemic.
As part of the acquisition of MSB, the Company purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of more than
insignificant deterioration of credit quality since origination. The carrying amount of those loans is as follows:
Purchase price of PCD loans at acquisition
Allowance for credit losses at acquisition
Non-credit discount at acquisition
Amortized cost of acquired PCD loans at acquisition
At July 10, 2020
(In Thousands)
69,415
(3,901)
(167)
65,347
$
$
Residential Mortgage Loans in Foreclosure
We may obtain physical possession of one- to four-family real estate collateralizing a residential mortgage loan via foreclosure or
through an in-substance repossession. As of June 30, 2021, we held one single-family property in other real estate owned with an
aggregate carrying value of $178,000 that was acquired through a foreclosure on a residential mortgage loan. As of that same date, we
held 11 residential mortgage loans with aggregate carrying values totaling $2.1 million which were in the process of foreclosure.
As of June 30, 2020, we held one single-family property in other real estate owned with an aggregate carrying value of $178,000 that
was acquired through a foreclosure on a residential mortgage loan. As of that same date, we held nine residential mortgage loans with
aggregate carrying values totaling $1.9 million which were in the process of foreclosure.
The States of New Jersey and New York have issued executive orders and enacted legislation declaring moratoriums on removing
individuals from a residential property as a result of an eviction or foreclosure proceeding. On August 4, 2021, the Governor of New
Jersey extended eviction protections for certain tenants. Such protections will extend until August 31, 2021 or December 31, 2021,
depending on income levels. The moratorium on home foreclosures is set to end on November 15, 2021, for all income levels. The
New York law, which places a moratorium on evictions for tenants who have endured COVID-related hardship and on foreclosures,
will be in effect until at least August 31, 2021. As a result, since March 28, 2020, the Company has temporarily suspended residential
property foreclosure sales and evictions.
F-38
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Loans Receivable (continued)
On September 4, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) imposed a nationwide temporary federal moratorium
on residential evictions due to nonpayment of rent, for qualified tenants. The national eviction moratorium took effect after the
expiration of eviction protections established by the CARES Act and was extended through July 31, 2021. In a new order issued by
the CDC on August 3, 2021, the eviction moratorium was extended for tenants living in counties experiencing substantial and high
levels of community transmission of COVID-19. This new order was set to expire on October 3, 2021. On August 26, 2021, the
United States Supreme Court issued an opinion which ended the moratorium.
These eviction moratoriums may be subject to legal challenges and may change or be rescinded completely based on the results of
court proceedings regarding the moratoriums.
Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses
Adoption of Topic 326
On July 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of
Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which replaces the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology, referred
to as the “CECL” methodology. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the adoption
of Topic 326.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans Receivable
The following tables present the balance of the allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020. For the year
ended June 30, 2021, the balance of the allowance for credit losses is based on the CECL methodology, as noted above. For the year
ended June 30, 2020, the allowance for loan losses is based upon the calculation methodology as described in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The tables identify the valuation allowances attributable to specifically
identified impairments on individually evaluated loans, including those acquired with deteriorated credit quality, as well as valuation
allowances for impairments on loans evaluated collectively. The tables include the underlying balance of loans receivable applicable
to each category as of those dates.
Allowance for Credit Losses
June 30, 2021
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
Balance of allowance for credit
losses:
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality individually
analyzed
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality collectively
analyzed
Loans individually
evaluated
Loans collectively
evaluated
Total allowance for credit losses
$
- $
2,700 $
- $
- $
122 $
21 $
- $
2,843
155
692
1,368
2,025
15
33
49
204
-
447
1
1
-
1,116
-
3,874
26,927
$ 28,450 $
10,826
16,243 $
2,038
2,086 $
1,121
1,170 $
8,974
9,747 $
410
433 $
36 50,332
36 $ 58,165
F-39
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)
Balance of Loans Receivable
June 30, 2021
Balance of loans receivable:
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality individually
evaluated
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality collectively
evaluated
Loans individually
evaluated
Loans collectively
evaluated
Total loans
Unaccreted yield adjustments
Loans receivable, net of yield
adjustments
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$
- $
6,519 $
183 $
- $
3,617 $
380 $
- $
10,699
5,599
25,844
2,533
12,970
4,785
65
-
51,796
18,526
30,668
729
2,228
15,553
1,364
-
69,068
2,015,135 1,016,413
$2,039,260 $ 1,079,444 $
165,506
168,951 $
78,606 1,423,766 46,062
93,804 $ 1,447,721 $ 47,871 $
3,259 4,748,747
3,259 $4,880,310
(28,916)
$4,851,394
Allowance for Loan Losses
June 30, 2020
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
Balance of allowance for loan losses:
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality
Loans individually
evaluated for impairment
Loans collectively
evaluated for impairment
Total allowance for loan losses
$
- $
-
- $
- $
41
47
- $
-
- $
1
- $
-
- $
-
-
89
20,916
$ 20,916 $
8,722
8,763 $
1,879
1,926 $
236
236 $
4,859
4,860 $
568
568 $
58 37,238
58 $ 37,327
F-40
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)
Balance of Loans Receivable
June 30, 2020
Balance of loans receivable:
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality
Loans individually
evaluated for impairment
Loans collectively
evaluated for impairment
Total loans
Unaccreted yield adjustments
Loans receivable, net of yield
adjustments
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
(In Thousands)
$
- $
- $
222 $
- $
77 $
- $
-
299
2,962
24,048
5,567
-
10,689
1,557
-
44,823
2,056,606
$2,059,568 $
936,805
960,853 $
132,999
138,788 $
20,961 1,262,256 81,363
20,961 $ 1,273,022 $ 82,920 $
3,991 4,494,981
3,991 $4,540,103
(41,706)
$4,498,397
The following table presents the activity in the ACL on loans for the year ended June 30, 2021:
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
Year Ended June 30, 2021
(In Thousands)
Changes in the allowance for credit
losses for the year ended
June 30, 2021:
At June 30, 2020 (prior to adoption
of ASC 326):
Impact of adopting Topic 326
Charge offs
Recoveries
Initial allowance on PCD loans
(Reversal of) provision for credit
losses
$ 20,916 $
8,763 $
1,926 $
236 $
4,860 $
568 $
58 $ 37,327
8,408
-
-
250
2,390
(80)
-
1,720
(421)
(1,446)
17
1,007
80
-
-
99
9,106
(13)
4
720
92
(32)
-
105
(15) 19,640
(1,612)
(41)
30
9
3,901
-
(1,124)
3,450
1,003
755
(4,930)
(300)
25
(1,121)
Total allowance for credit losses
$ 28,450 $
16,243 $
2,086 $
1,170 $
9,747 $
433 $
36 $ 58,165
F-41
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)
For the accounting policy on the allowance for loan losses that was in effect prior to the adoption of Topic 326, see Note 1 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The following tables present the activity in the allowance for
loan losses for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019:
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
Year Ended June 30, 2020
(In Thousands)
Changes in the allowance for loan
losses for the year ended
June 30, 2020:
At June 30, 2019:
$ 16,959 $
9,672 $
2,467 $
136 $
3,377 $
491 $
172 $ 33,274
Total charge offs
Total recoveries
Provision for (reversal of) loan
losses
-
-
-
10
(50)
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
(139)
33
(189)
45
3,957
(919)
(493)
100
1,483
77
(8)
4,197
Total allowance for loan losses
$ 20,916 $
8,763 $
1,926 $
236 $
4,860 $
568 $
58 $ 37,327
Multi-
Family
Mortgage
Non-
Residential
Mortgage
Commercial
Business
Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Loans
Other
Consumer Total
Year Ended June 30, 2019
(In Thousands)
Changes in the allowance for loan
losses for the year ended
June 30, 2019:
At June 30, 2018:
$ 14,946 $
9,787 $
2,552 $
258 $
2,479 $
430 $
413 $ 30,865
Total charge offs
Total recoveries
Provision for (reversal of) loan
losses
-
-
(54)
6
(861)
47
-
-
(83)
-
-
-
(285)
83
(1,283)
136
2,013
(67)
729
(122)
981
61
(39)
3,556
Total allowance for loan losses
$ 16,959 $
9,672 $
2,467 $
136 $
3,377 $
491 $
172 $ 33,274
F-42
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)
Allowance for Credit Losses on Off Balance Sheet Commitments
The following tables present the activity in the ACL on off balance sheet commitments for the year ended June 30, 2021:
Changes in the allowance for credit
losses for the year ended
June 30, 2021:
At June 30, 2020:
Impact of adopting Topic 326 (1)
Provision recorded in other non-interest expense
Total allowance for credit losses on off balance sheet commitments
(1)
Adoption of CECL accounting standard effective July 1, 2020.
Year Ended
June 30, 2021
(In Thousands)
$
$
-
536
1,172
1,708
Note 7 – Leases
The Company leases certain premises and equipment under operating leases. As of June 30, 2021 the Company had right-of-use assets
totaling $17.1 million and lease liabilities totaling $17.8 million. By comparison at June 30, 2020, the Company had right-of-use
assets of totaling $16.5 million and lease liabilities of totaling $17.1 million.
As of June 30, 2021, the weighted average remaining lease term for operating leases was 7.96 years and the weighted average discount
rate used in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was 2.40%. Total operating lease costs for the years ended June 30, 2021 and
2020 was $3.8 million and $4.0 million, respectively.
There were no sale and leaseback transactions, leveraged leases or lease transactions with related parties during the year ended June
30 2021. At June 30, 2021, the Company had no leases that had not yet commenced.
A maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total operating lease liability
at June 30, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
Less than one year
After one year but within two years
After two years but within three years
After three years but within four years
After four years but within five years
Greater than five years
Total undiscounted cash flows
Less: discount on cash flows
Total lease liability
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
3,604
2,998
2,372
1,917
1,759
7,205
19,855
(2,028)
17,827
$
$
3,212
3,004
2,405
1,739
1,509
7,373
19,242
(2,115)
17,127
$
$
F-43
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Premises and Equipment
Land
Buildings and improvements
Leasehold improvements
Furnishings and equipment
Construction in progress
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
Total premises and equipment
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
$
12,192 $
47,535
12,075
28,349
71
100,222
43,884
56,338 $
12,376
46,219
10,234
24,719
4,174
97,722
40,333
57,389
Depreciation expense on premises and equipment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019 totaled $5.9 million, $4.6
million and $4.3 million, respectively.
Note 9 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Balance at June 30, 2018
Amortization
Balance at June 30, 2019
Amortization
Balance at June 30, 2020
Acquisition of MSB Financial Corp.
Amortization
Balance at June 30, 2021
Goodwill
Core Deposit Intangibles
(In Thousands)
210,895 $
-
210,895
-
210,895
-
-
210,895 $
6,295
(1,135)
5,160
(1,165)
3,995
690
(980)
3,705
$
$
Scheduled amortization of core deposit intangibles for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
Year Ending
June 30,
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Thereafter
Core Deposit Intangible
Amortization
(In Thousands)
$
685
563
526
495
467
969
F-44
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 10 – Deposits
Deposits are summarized as follows:
Non-interest-bearing demand
Interest-bearing demand
Savings
Certificates of deposits
Total deposits
Brokered deposits are summarized as follows:
June 30,
2021
Weighted
Average
Balance
Interest Rate
Balance
(Dollars in Thousands)
2020
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
$
$
593,718
1,902,478
1,111,364
1,877,746
5,485,306
0.00 % $
0.18
0.13
0.57
0.28 % $
419,138
1,264,151
906,597
1,840,396
4,430,282
0.00 %
0.54
0.83
1.79
1.07 %
June 30,
2021
Weighted
Average
Balance
Interest Rate
Balance
(Dollars in Thousands)
2020
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Certificates of deposits
Total brokered deposits
$
$
458,616
458,616
0.10 % $
0.10 % $
31,379
31,379
2.16 %
2.16 %
A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity follows:
One year or less
After one year to two years
After two years to three years
After three years to four years
After four years to five years
After five years
Total certificates of deposit
June 30,
2021
(In Thousands)
$
$
1,510,761
246,754
41,230
41,913
30,790
6,298
1,877,746
Certificates of deposit with balances of $250,000 or more at June 30, 2021 and 2020, totaled approximately $635.3 million and $297.0
million, respectively. The Bank’s deposits are insurable to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
F-45
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 11 – Borrowings
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB of New York mature as follows:
By remaining period to maturity:
Less than one year
One to two years
Two to three years
Three to four years
Four to five years
Greater than five years
Total advances
Unamortized fair value adjustments
Total advances, net of
fair value adjustments
June 30, 2021
June 30, 2020
Weighted
Average
Balance
Interest Rate
Balance
(Dollars in Thousands)
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
$
390,000
145,000
22,500
103,500
6,500
-
667,500
(1,624)
0.33 % $
3.04
2.63
2.68
2.82
-
1.38 %
865,000
27,000
145,000
22,500
103,500
6,500
1,169,500
(2,071)
$
665,876
$
1,167,429
0.45 %
2.85
3.04
2.63
2.68
2.82
1.08 %
At June 30, 2021, FHLB advances were collateralized by the FHLB capital stock owned by the Bank and mortgage loans and
securities with carrying values totaling approximately $3.27 billion and $170.1 million, respectively. At June 30, 2020, FHLB
advances were collateralized by the FHLB capital stock owned by the Bank and mortgage loans and securities with carrying values
totaling approximately $3.21 billion and $155.3 million, respectively.
Borrowings at June 30, 2021 also included other overnight borrowings totaling $20.0 million while there were no such borrowings at
June 30, 2020. Borrowings at June 30, 2020 also included overnight borrowings in the form of depositor sweep accounts totaling $5.7
million, while there were no such borrowings at June 30, 2021.
F-46
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. The Company’s
derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or
expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to specific wholesale funding positions.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Financial Condition
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the
Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
June 30, 2021
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
Location
Fair Value
Location
Fair Value
(In Thousands)
Other assets
$
$
Other liabilities
1,832
1,832
$
$
673
673
June 30, 2020
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
Location
Fair Value
Location
Fair Value
(In Thousands)
Other assets
$
$
Other liabilities
235
235
$
$
18,177
18,177
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments:
Interest rate contracts
Total
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments:
Interest rate contracts
Total
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using derivatives are primarily to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest
rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company has entered into interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate
risk management strategy. These interest rate products are designated as cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had a
total of 12 interest rate swaps and caps with a total notional amount of $1.04 billion hedging specific wholesale funding positions.
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivatives is recorded in other comprehensive income, net of
tax, and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest
payments are made on the Company’s variable rate wholesale funding positions. During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company
had $8.3 million of reclassifications to interest expense. During the next 12 months, the Company estimates that $5.4 million will be
reclassified as an increase in interest expense.
F-47
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
The tables below present the pre-tax effects of the Company’s derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income as of
June 30, 2021, June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019:
Amount of Gain
(Loss) Recognized
in OCI on
Derivatives
Year Ended June 30, 2021
Location of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(In Thousands)
Amount of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
10,825
10,825
Interest expense
$
$
(8,281)
(8,281)
Amount of Gain
(Loss) Recognized
in OCI on
Derivatives
Year Ended June 30, 2020
Location of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(In Thousands)
Amount of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(21,264)
(21,264)
Interest expense
$
$
1,870
1,870
Amount of Gain
(Loss) Recognized
in OCI on
Derivatives
Year Ended June 30, 2019
Location of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(In Thousands)
Amount of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(21,409)
(21,409)
Interest expense
$
$
6,753
6,753
$
$
$
$
$
$
Derivatives in cash flow
hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts
Total
Derivatives in cash flow
hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts
Total
Derivatives in cash flow
hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts
Total
F-48
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
Offsetting Derivatives
The table below presents a gross presentation, the effects of offsetting, and a net presentation of the Company’s derivatives in the
Consolidated Statement of Condition as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively. The net amounts presented for derivative
assets or liabilities can be reconciled to the tabular disclosure of fair value. The tabular disclosure of fair value provides the location
that derivative assets and liabilities are presented on the Consolidated Statement of Condition.
June 30, 2021
Gross Amount
Recognized
Gross
Amounts
Offset
Net Amounts
Presented
Gross Amounts Not Offset
Cash
Collateral
Received
Financial
Instruments
Net Amount
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Interest rate contracts
Total
$
$
6,847 $
6,847 $
(5,015) $
(5,015) $
1,832 $
1,832 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
1,832
1,832
Gross Amount
Recognized
Gross
Amounts
Offset
Net Amounts
Presented
Gross Amounts Not Offset
Cash
Collateral
Posted
Financial
Instruments
Net Amount
(In Thousands)
Liabilities:
Interest rate contracts
Total
$
$
5,688 $
5,688 $
(5,015) $
(5,015) $
673 $
673 $
- $
- $
(673) $
$
(673)
-
-
June 30, 2020
Gross Amount
Recognized
Gross
Amounts
Offset
Net Amounts
Presented
Gross Amounts Not Offset
Cash
Collateral
Received
Financial
Instruments
Net Amount
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Interest rate contracts
Total
$
$
592 $
592 $
(357) $
(357) $
235 $
235 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
235
235
Gross Amount
Recognized
Gross
Amounts
Offset
Net Amounts
Presented
Gross Amounts Not Offset
Cash
Collateral
Posted
Financial
Instruments
Net Amount
(In Thousands)
Liabilities:
Interest rate contracts
Total
$
$
18,534 $
18,534 $
(357) $
(357) $
18,177 $
18,177 $
- $
- $
(18,177) $
$
(18,177)
-
-
F-49
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company defaults on any
of its indebtedness, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations and could be required to terminate
its derivative positions with the counterparty. The Company also has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain a
provision where if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, then the Company could be required to
terminate its derivative positions with the counterparty. As of June 30, 2021, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability
position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to those agreements was $1.1
million.
As required under the enforceable master netting arrangement with its derivatives counterparties, at June 30, 2021 the Company
posted financial collateral of $673,000 that was not included as an offsetting amount. By comparison, at June 30, 2020, the Company
posted financial collateral of $18.2 million that was not included as offsetting amount.
In addition to the derivative instruments noted above, the Company’s pipeline of loans held for sale at June 30, 2021 and June 30,
2020, included $48.4 million and $127.2 million, respectively, of in process loans whose terms included interest rate locks to
borrowers, which are considered free-standing derivative instruments whose fair values are not material to our financial condition or
results of operations.
Note 13 – Benefit Plans
Components of Net Periodic Expense
The following table sets forth the aggregate net periodic benefit expense for the Bank’s Benefit Equalization Plan, Postretirement
Welfare Plan, Directors’ Consultation and Retirement Plan and Atlas Bank Retirement Income Plan:
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
Affected Line Item in the Consolidated
Statements of Income
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of unrecognized loss
Expected return on assets
Net periodic benefit cost
$
$
106 $
262
83
(113)
338
$
78 $
54 Salaries and employee benefits
326
19
(112)
311
$
378 Miscellaneous non-interest expense
43 Miscellaneous non-interest expense
(112) Miscellaneous non-interest expense
363
The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income separately
from the service cost component. The table above details the affected line items within the Consolidated Statements of Income related
to the net periodic benefit costs for the periods noted.
F-50
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
ESOP
In conjunction to the Company’s initial public stock offering in February 2005, the Bank established an ESOP for all eligible
employees. The ESOP purchased 2,409,764 shares of Company’s common stock with proceeds of a loan from the Company to the
ESOP. In connection with the completion of the Company’s mutual to stock conversion in May 2015, the ESOP purchased an
additional 3,612,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $10.00 per share with the proceeds of a new loan from the
Company to the ESOP. The Company refinanced the outstanding principal and interest balance of $3.8 million and borrowed and
additional $36.1 million to purchase the additional shares. The Company makes discretionary contributions to the ESOP equaling
principal and interest payments owed on the ESOP’s loan to the Company. Such payments may be reduced by the amount of
dividends paid on shares of the Company’s common stock held by the ESOP. The outstanding loan principal balance at June 30, 2021
was $30.0 million.
ESOP shares pledged as collateral are initially recorded as unearned ESOP shares in the consolidated statements of financial
condition. ESOP compensation expense was approximately $2,069,000, $2,354,000 and $2,464,000 for the years ended June 30, 2021,
2020 and 2019, respectively, representing the fair value of shares allocated or committed to be released during the year.
At June 30, 2021 and 2020, the ESOP shares were as follows:
Allocated shares
Total shares distributed to employees
Shares committed to be released
Unearned shares
Total ESOP shares
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
2,021
1,141
100
2,760
6,022
1,924
1,038
100
2,960
6,022
Fair value of unearned ESOP shares
$
32,982 $
24,213
Employee Stock Ownership Plan Benefit Equalization Plan ("ESOP BEP")
The Bank has a non-qualified plan to compensate its executive officers who participate in the Bank's ESOP for certain benefits lost
under such plan by reason of benefit limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). The ESOP BEP expense was
approximately $37,000, $24,000 and $47,000 for the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The liability totaled
approximately $18,000 and $20,000 at June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Employees’ Savings and Profit Sharing Plan
The Bank sponsors the Employees' Savings and Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the “Plan”), pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code, for all eligible employees. Employees may elect to contribute up to 75% of their compensation subject to the
limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The Bank will contribute a matching contribution up to 3.5% of an eligible
employee’s salary deferral contribution, provided the eligible employee has contributed 6%. The Plan expense amounted to
approximately $1,335,000, $1,147,000 and $1,047,000 for the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Multi-Employer Retirement Plan
The Bank participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (“The Pentegra DB Plan”), a tax-qualified
defined-benefit pension plan. The Pentegra DB Plan’s Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the Plan Number is 001.
The Pentegra DB Plan operates as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes and as a multiple-employer plan under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the IRC. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that require
contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan.
F-51
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
The Pentegra DB Plan is a single plan under Internal Revenue Code Section 413(c) and, as a result, all of the assets stand behind all of
the liabilities. Accordingly, under the Pentegra DB Plan contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide
benefits to participants of other participating employers.
The Pentegra DB Plan is non-contributory and covers all eligible employees. In April 2007, the Board of Directors of the Bank
approved, effective July 1, 2007, freezing all future benefit accruals under the Pentegra DB Plan.
Funded status (market value of plan assets divided by funding target) of the Pentegra DB Plan based on valuation reports as of July 1,
2020 and 2019 was 102.31% and 104.08%, respectively. Total contributions, made to the Pentegra DB Plan, which include
contributions from all participating employers and not just the Company, as reported on Form 5500, were $253.2 million and $138.3
million for the plan years ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, respectively. The Bank’s contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan
were not more than 5% of the total contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan. During the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the
total expense recorded for the Pentegra DB Plan was approximately $329,000, $340,000 and $967,000, respectively.
Atlas Bank Retirement Income Plan (“ABRIP”)
Through the merger with Atlas Bank, the Company acquired a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering all eligible
employees of Atlas Bank. Effective January 31, 2013, the ABRIP was frozen by Atlas Bank. All benefits for eligible participants
accrued in the ABRIP to the freeze date have been retained. The benefits are based on years of service and employee’s compensation.
The ABRIP is funded in conformity with funding requirements of applicable government regulations.
The following tables set forth the ABRIP’s funded status and net periodic benefit cost:
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation - beginning
Interest cost
Actuarial gain
Benefit payments
Projected benefit obligation - ending
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of assets - beginning
Actual return on assets
Benefit payments
Fair value of assets - ending
Reconciliation of funded status:
Projected benefit obligation
Fair value of assets
Funded status included in other assets
Accumulated benefit obligation
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
F-52
$
2,285
61
(49)
(148)
2,149
$
3,299
69
(148)
3,220
$
$
2,553
77
(228)
(117)
2,285
3,223
193
(117)
3,299
(2,149) $
3,220
1,071
$
(2,285)
3,299
1,014
(2,149) $
(2,285)
3.00%
N/A
2.75%
N/A
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
Net periodic benefit cost/(credit):
Interest cost
Expected return on assets
Amortization of net loss
Total benefit cost (credit)
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Long term rate of return on plan assets
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
$
61
$
(113)
22
(30) $
77
$
(112)
4
(31) $
108
(112)
57
53
2.75%
3.50%
3.75%
3.50%
4.25%
3.50%
The Bank does not expect to contribute to the ABRIP in the year ending June 30, 2022.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Years ending June 30:
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027-2031
Benefit
Payments
(In Thousands)
$
146
144
141
142
143
657
At June 30, 2021 and 2020, unrecognized net loss of $496,000 and $523,000, respectively, was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
The assets of the ABRIP are invested in a Guaranteed Deposit Fund (“GDF”) with Prudential Financial, Inc. The GDF is a group
annuity fund invested in public and private-issue debt securities through various sub-accounts. The underlying assets are valued based
on quoted prices for similar assets with similar terms and other observable market data and have no redemption restrictions. The
investments in the plan were monitored to ensure that they complied with the investment policies set forth in the plan document. The
plan’s assets were reviewed periodically by management, which included an analysis of the asset allocation and the performance of
the GDF prepared by Prudential Financial, Inc.
The overall investment objective of the ABRIP is to ensure safety of principal and seek an attractive rate of return. The GDF utilizes a
full spectrum of fixed income asset classes to provide the opportunity to maximize portfolio returns and diversification.
F-53
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
The fair values of the ABRIP’s assets at June 30, 2021 and 2020 by asset category (see Note 18 for the definitions of levels), are as
follows:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
June 30, 2021
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Prudential Guaranteed Deposit Fund
$
- $
(In Thousands)
3,220 $
- $
3,220
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
June 30, 2020
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Prudential Guaranteed Deposit Fund
$
- $
(In Thousands)
3,299 $
- $
3,299
F-54
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
Benefit Equalization Plan (“BEP”)
The Bank has an unfunded non-qualified plan to compensate executive officers of the Bank who participate in the Bank’s qualified
defined benefit plan for certain benefits lost under such plans by reason of benefit limitations imposed by Sections 415 and 401 of the
IRC. There were approximately $239,000, $237,000 and $235,000 in contributions made to and benefits paid under the BEP during
each of the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The following tables set forth the BEP’s funded status and components of net periodic benefit cost:
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation - beginning
Interest cost
Actuarial (gain) loss
Benefit payments
Projected benefit obligation - ending
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of assets - beginning
Contributions
Benefit payments
Fair value of assets - ending
Reconciliation of funded status:
Accumulated benefit obligation
Projected benefit obligation
Fair value of assets
Funded status included in other liabilities
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
Net periodic benefit cost:
Interest cost
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Total expense
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
3,206
85
(53)
(239)
$
2,999
$
-
239
(239)
$
-
3,105
112
226
(237)
3,206
-
237
(237)
-
(2,999) $
(3,206)
(2,999) $
-
(2,999) $
(3,206)
-
(3,206)
3.00%
N/A
2.75%
N/A
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
$
85
75
160
$
$
112
56
168
$
$
125
44
169
2.75%
N/A
3.75%
N/A
4.25%
N/A
F-55
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
It is estimated that contributions of approximately $238,000 will be made during the year ending June 30, 2022.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Years ending June 30:
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027-2031
Benefit
Payments
(In Thousands)
$
238
235
231
228
223
1,030
In April 2007, the Board of Directors of the Bank approved, effective July 1, 2007, freezing all future benefit accruals under the BEP
related to the Bank’s defined benefit pension plan.
At June 30, 2021 and 2020, unrecognized net loss of $1,029,000 and $1,157,000, respectively, was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
F-56
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
Postretirement Welfare Plan
The Bank has an unfunded postretirement group term life insurance plan covering all eligible employees. The benefits are based on
age and years of service. During the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, contributions and benefits paid totaled $11,000,
$11,000 and $6,000, respectively.
The following tables set forth the accrued accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the net periodic benefit cost:
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation - beginning
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial (gain) loss
Premiums/claims paid
Projected benefit obligation - ending
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of assets - beginning
Contributions
Premiums/claims paid
Fair value of assets - ending
Reconciliation of funded status:
Projected benefit obligation
Fair value of assets
Funded status included in other liabilities
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of net actuarial gain
Total expense (benefit)
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
991
106
27
(4)
(12)
$
1,108
$
-
12
(12)
$
-
(1,108) $
-
(1,108) $
710
78
26
188
(11)
991
-
11
(11)
-
(991)
-
(991)
3.00%
3.25%
2.75%
3.25%
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
$
$
106
27
(14)
$
119
$
78
26
(41)
$
63
54
26
(49)
31
2.75%
3.25%
3.75%
3.25%
4.25%
3.25%
F-57
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
It is estimated that contributions of approximately $44,000 will be made during the year ending June 30, 2022.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Years ending June 30:
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027-2031
Benefit
Payments
(In Thousands)
$
44
52
61
70
84
522
At June 30, 2021 and 2020, unrecognized net gain of $230,000 and $240,000, respectively, were included in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
F-58
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
Directors’ Consultation and Retirement Plan (“DCRP”)
The Bank has an unfunded retirement plan for non-employee directors. The benefits are payable based on term of service as a director.
During each of the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, contributions and benefits paid totaled $69,000, $60,000 and $60,000,
respectively.
The following table sets forth the DCRP’s funded status and components of net periodic cost:
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation - beginning
Interest cost
Actuarial (gain) loss
Benefit payments
Projected benefit obligation - ending
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of assets - beginning
Contributions
Benefit payments
Fair value of assets - ending
Reconciliation of funded status:
Accumulated benefit obligation
Projected benefit obligation
Fair value of assets
Funded status included in other liabilities
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of net actuarial gain
Total expense (benefit)
Valuation assumptions
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,269
89
(173)
(69)
$
3,116
$
-
69
(69)
$
-
2,975
110
244
(60)
3,269
-
60
(60)
-
(3,116) $
(3,269)
(3,116) $
-
(3,116) $
(3,269)
-
(3,269)
3.00%
N/A
2.75%
N/A
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
$
-
89
-
89
$
$
-
110
-
110
$
$
-
119
(9)
110
2.75%
N/A
3.75%
N/A
4.25%
N/A
F-59
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Benefit Plans (continued)
It is estimated that contributions of approximately $71,000 will be made during the year ending June 30, 2022.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Years ending June 30:
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027-2031
Benefit
Payments
(In Thousands)
$
71
91
111
149
167
1,178
In December 2015, the Board of Directors of the Bank approved freezing all future benefit accruals under the DCRP effective
December 31, 2015.
At June 30, 2021 and 2020 unrecognized net gain of $203,000 and $30,000, respectively, was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, no unrecognized net gain or net loss is expected to be recognized as
a component of net periodic benefit cost.
Note 14 – Stock Based Compensation
At the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholder’s held on October 27, 2016, the stockholders approved the Kearny Financial
Corp. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (“2016 Plan”) which provides for the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards. The 2016
Plan authorized up to 3,687,628 shares as stock option grants and 1,523,696 shares as restricted stock awards.
At June 30, 2021, there were 572,628 shares remaining available for future stock option grants while there were no shares remaining
for future restricted stock awards under the 2016 Plan.
Stock options granted under the 2016 Plan vest in equal installments over a five-year service period. Stock options were granted at an
exercise price equal to the fair value of the Company's common stock on the grant date based on the closing market price and have an
expiration period of 10 years.
The fair value of stock options granted as part of the 2016 Plan was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
the following assumptions for the periods presented below:
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
Expected dividend yield
Weighted average volatility factor of the expected
market price of the Company's stock
Weighted average expected life of the
options (in years)
Weighted average fair value of options granted
2021
-
-
-
-
-
Years Ended June 30,
2020
-
-
-
-
-
$
2019
2.09%
1.77%
14.03%
4.9
2.54
F-60
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 14 – Stock Based Compensation (continued)
The weighted average expected life of the stock option represents the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding
and is estimated using historical data of stock option exercises and forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical market price volatility of the Company's
stock. The expected dividend yield reflects the expected level of regular cash dividends declared and paid to shareholders, based on
the Company's dividend payout ratio of approximately 50% of net income, in relation to the market price of the Company's capital
stock at the time of grant. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the fair values of these awards, which have graded
vesting, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards.
There were 53,706 restricted stock awards granted during the year ended June 30, 2021. There were no restricted stock awards granted
during the year ended June 30, 2020. The Company awarded 233,000 shares of restricted stock during the year ended June 30, 2019.
During the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded $5.7 million, $5.9 million and $6.1 million,
respectively, of share-based compensation expense, comprised of stock option expense of $1.8 million, $1.8 million and $2.0 million
respectively, and restricted stock expense of $3.8 million, $4.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively.
During the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the income tax benefit attributed to non-qualified stock options expense was
approximately $422,000, $432,000 and 453,000, respectively, and attributed to restricted stock expense was approximately $1.4
million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The following is a summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for its option plans for the year ended June
30, 2021:
Outstanding at June 30, 2020
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at June 30, 2021
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Options
(In Thousands)
3,294 $
-
(41)
-
3,253 $
14.90
-
9.00
-
14.97
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
6.5 years
-
2.5 years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(In Thousands)
11
$
5.5 years
$
177
177
Exercisable at June 30, 2021
2,510 $
15.00
5.4 years
$
The Company generally issues shares from authorized but unissued shares upon the exercise of vested options.
A total of 41,412 vested options, with an aggregate intrinsic value of $158,000, were exercised during the year ended June 30, 2021.
In fulfillment of these exercises, the Company issued 41,412 shares from authorized but unissued shares. There were no vested options
exercised during the year ended June 30, 2020. A total of 48,314 vested options, with an aggregate intrinsic value of $235,000, were
exercised during the year ended June 30, 2019.
The cash proceeds from stock option exercises during the year ended June 30, 2021 totaled approximately $373,000. A portion of such
exercises represented disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options for which the Company recognized $47,000 in income tax
benefit. The cash proceeds from stock option exercises during the year ended June 30, 2019 totaled approximately $423,000. A
portion of such exercises represented disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options for which the Company recognized $69,000
in income tax benefit.
Expected future compensation expense relating to the 743,000 non-vested options outstanding as of June 30, 2021 is $1.1 million over
a weighted average period of 2.5 years.
F-61
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 14 – Stock Based Compensation (continued)
Restricted shares awarded under the 2016 Plan generally vest in equal installments over a five-year service period. In addition to the
requisite service period, the vesting of certain restricted shares awarded to management are also conditioned upon the achievement of
one or more objective performance factors established by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. In
accordance with the terms of the 2016 Plan, such factors may be based on the performance of the Company as a whole or on any one
or more business units of the Company or its subsidiaries. Performance factors may be measured relative to a peer group, an index or
certain financial targets established in the Company's strategic business plan and budget.
The vesting of the applicable performance-based restricted shares over the fifth year of the five-year service period was conditioned
upon the achievement of the Company's earning-based performance targets for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Such performance
targets were established by the Board of Directors in the Company's strategic business plan and budget for that period. The Company
fully achieved the applicable performance targets for fiscal 2021 and therefore expects that all eligible performance-based restricted
shares will successfully vest over the fifth year of the five-year service period. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company
fully achieved the applicable performance targets and all eligible performance-based restricted shares successfully vested in the fourth
year of the five-year service period.
The performance factors and underlying cost basis of the performance-based restricted shares that are scheduled to vest over the final
year of the service period is generally expected to be determined annually concurrent with the anniversary date of the original grants.
For service based awards management recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of restricted shares on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period. For performance vesting awards management recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of
restricted shares on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period; however, if the corporate performance goals to which the
vesting of such shares are tied are not achieved, recognized compensation expense is adjusted accordingly.
The following is a summary of the status of the Company's non-vested restricted share awards as of June 30, 2021 and changes during
the year ended June 30, 2021:
Vesting Contingent on Service
Conditions
Vesting Contingent on Performance
and Service Conditions
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Restricted
Shares
(In Thousands)
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Restricted
Shares
(In Thousands)
420 $
27
(183)
-
264 $
14.86
13.11
15.07
-
14.54
227 $
27
(94)
-
160 $
14.69
13.11
14.95
-
14.27
Non-vested at June 30, 2020
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Non-vested at June 30, 2021
During the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the total fair value of vested restricted shares were $4.2 million, $4.2 million
and $4.1 million, respectively. Expected future compensation expense relating to the 423,676 non-vested restricted shares at June 30,
2021 is $3.3 million over a weighted average period of 4.9 years.
F-62
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 15 – Stockholders’ Equity
Regulatory Capital
Federal banking regulators impose various restrictions or requirements on the ability of savings institutions to make capital
distributions, including cash dividends. A savings institution that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as the
Bank, must file an application or a notice with federal banking regulators at least 30 days before making a capital distribution. A
savings institution must file an application for prior approval of a capital distribution if: (i) it is not eligible for expedited treatment
under the applications processing rules of federal banking regulators; (ii) the total amount of all capital distributions, including the
proposed capital distribution, for the applicable calendar year would exceed an amount equal to the savings institution’s net income
for that year to date plus the institution’s retained net income for the preceding two years; (iii) it would not adequately be capitalized
after the capital distribution; or (iv) the distribution would violate an agreement with federal banking regulators or applicable
regulations. Federal banking regulators may disapprove a notice or deny an application for a capital distribution if: (i) the savings
institution would be undercapitalized following the capital distribution; (ii) the proposed capital distribution raises safety and
soundness concerns; or (iii) the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute, regulation or agreement.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, applications for capital distributions from the Bank to the Company were approved by
federal banking regulators in the amount of $40.0 million, $45.0 million and $50.0 million which was paid by the Bank to the
Company in October 2020, January 2021 and May 2021, respectively. Also, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, an application
for quarterly capital distributions from the Bank to the Company was approved by federal banking regulators. The amount of
dividends payable is based on 75 percent of quarterly net income of the Bank.
During the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, dividends paid by the Bank to the Company, in conjunction with quarterly capital
distributions, as discussed above, totaled $43.9 million and $30.0 million, respectively.
The Bank and the Company are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to
meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines
and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank and consolidated Company must meet specific capital guidelines
that involve quantitative measures of their respective assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s and consolidated Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting, and other factors.
The minimum capital level requirements applicable to both the Bank and the consolidated Company include: (i) a common equity Tier
1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all
institutions. The previously amended rules also established a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory
minimum capital ratios, and when fully phased in, would result in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital
ratio of 7.0%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%; and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The capital conservation buffer requirement
began phasing in at January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased each calendar year until it was fully implemented
in at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and
paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage
of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.
At June 30, 2021, the regulatory capital ratios, of both the Company and the Bank were in excess of the levels required by federal
banking regulators to be classified as “well-capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.
F-63
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 15 – Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
The following tables present information regarding the Bank’s regulatory capital levels at June 30, 2021 and 2020:
Actual
Amount
Ratio
At June 30, 2021
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
Ratio
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Amount
Ratio
$ 761,883
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
726,737
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) 726,737
726,737
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)
17.22 % $ 353,970
16.42 % 265,477
16.42 % 199,108
10.23 % 284,114
8.00 % $ 442,462
6.00 % 353,970
4.50 % 287,600
4.00 % 355,142
10.00 %
8.00 %
6.50 %
5.00 %
Actual
Amount
Ratio
At June 30, 2020
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
Ratio
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Amount
Ratio
$ 816,577
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
779,250
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) 779,250
779,250
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)
21.38 % $ 305,562
20.40 % 229,172
20.40 % 171,879
11.95 % 260,893
8.00 % $ 381,953
6.00 % 305,562
4.50 % 248,269
4.00 % 326,116
10.00 %
8.00 %
6.50 %
5.00 %
The following tables present information regarding the consolidated Company’s regulatory capital levels at June 30, 2021 and June
30, 2020:
At June 30, 2021
Actual
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Amount
872,823
837,677
837,677
837,677
Ratio
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
19.65 % $
18.86 %
18.86 %
11.76 %
355,274
266,456
199,842
284,877
Ratio
8.00 %
6.00 %
4.50 %
4.00 %
At June 30, 2020
Actual
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Amount
906,058
868,731
868,731
868,731
Ratio
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
23.61 % $
22.64 %
22.64 %
13.27 %
306,958
230,219
172,664
261,783
Ratio
8.00 %
6.00 %
4.50 %
4.00 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)
$
$
F-64
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 15 – Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
Stock Repurchase Plans
In March 2019 the Company announced its fourth stock repurchase plan which authorized the repurchase of 9,218,324 shares, or 10%,
of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On March 25, 2020, that plan was temporarily suspended due to the risks and
uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. On October 19, 2020, the Company announced the resumption of that plan
which had, as of that date, 761,030 shares of common stock remained to be repurchased. On October 19, 2020, the Company
announced the approval of a fifth repurchase plan totaling 4,475,523 shares, or 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock
which was implemented upon the completion of the fourth stock repurchase plan. On January 22, 2021, the Company announced the
completion of its fifth stock repurchase plan and the authorization of a sixth stock repurchase plan to repurchase up to 4,210,520
shares, or 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On May 26, 2021, the Company announced the completion of its sixth
stock repurchase plan and the authorization of a seventh stock repurchase plan to repurchase up to 4,064,649 shares, or 5%, of the
Company’s outstanding common stock.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company repurchased a total of 10,567,073 shares of its common stock which were
repurchased in conjunction with the Company’s fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh repurchase plans. Such shares were repurchased at a
total cost of $119.0 million and at an average cost of $11.26 per share.
Including shares previously repurchased, the shares associated with the fourth repurchase plan were repurchased at a total cost of
$117.9 million and at an average cost of $12.79 per share. The Company fully repurchased shares associated with the Company’s fifth
share repurchase plan during the quarter ended March 31, 2021, such shares were repurchased at a total cost of $46.9 million and at an
average cost of $10.48 per share. The shares repurchased related to the Company’s sixth share repurchase plan were repurchased at a
total cost of $51.1 million and at an average cost of $12.15 per share.
During the year ended June 30, 2021, and in conjunction with the Company’s seventh repurchase program, the Company repurchased
1,120,000 shares at a cost of $14.2 million and at an average cost of $12.65 per share which represented 27.6% of the total shares
authorized to be repurchased.
Note 16 – Income Taxes
The components of income taxes are as follows:
Current income tax expense:
Federal
State
Deferred income tax expense:
Federal
State
Valuation allowance
Total income tax expense
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
12,051 $
5,058
17,109
6,745 $
4,877
11,622
2,673
2,016
4,689
(535)
1,153
235
1,388
(723)
5,656
3,733
9,389
3,842
368
4,210
328
$
21,263 $
12,287 $
13,927
The following table presents a reconciliation between the reported income taxes for the periods presented and the income taxes which
would be computed by applying the federal income tax rates applicable to those periods. The federal income tax rate of 21% was
applicable for the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
F-65
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 16 – Income Taxes (continued)
Income before income taxes
Statutory federal tax rate
Federal income tax expense at statutory rate
(Reduction) increases in income taxes resulting from:
Tax exempt interest
State tax, net of federal tax effect
Incentive stock options compensation expense
Income from bank-owned life insurance
Disqualifying disposition on incentive stock
options
Non-deductible merger-related expenses
Bargain purchase gain
Tax benefit arising from the adoption of the CARES
Act provisions
Other items, net
Valuation allowance
Total income tax expense
Effective income tax rate
2021
84,496
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(Dollars In Thousands)
$
57,252
$
21%
21%
17,744
$
12,023
$
$
$
(345)
5,464
85
(1,255)
(33)
49
(641)
-
730
21,798
(535)
(497)
3,914
78
(1,314)
-
148
-
(1,624)
282
13,010
(723)
$
21,263
$
12,287
$
25.16%
21.46%
2019
56,069
21%
11,774
(589)
3,510
88
(1,329)
(24)
-
-
-
169
13,599
328
13,927
24.84%
The effective income tax rate represents total income tax expense divided by income before income taxes. Retained earnings at
June 30, 2021, includes approximately $38.4 million of bad debt allowance, pursuant to the IRC, for which income taxes have not
been provided. If such amount is used for purposes other than to absorb bad debts, including distributions in liquidation, it will be
subject to income tax at the then current rate.
A tax position is recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or
sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon
examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation process, if any. A tax position that meets the more likely than
not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent
likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The
determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more likely than not recognition threshold considers the facts,
circumstances, and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment.
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income or the existence of sufficient taxable
income within the carryover period. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers the scheduled reversal
of the deferred tax liabilities, the level of historical taxable income, and the projected future taxable income over the periods in which
the temporary differences comprising the deferred tax assets will be deductible. Based on its assessment, management determined the
following related to June 30, 2021 and 2020:
In the year ended June 30, 2020, the valuation allowance against the charitable contribution carryover was reversed as it became more
likely than not that the charitable contribution would be realized. In addition, the Company maintained a valuation allowance during
the year ended June 30, 2020, against a portion of the deferred tax asset arising from fair value adjustments on investment securities
acquired in a prior acquisition.
F-66
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 16 – Income Taxes (continued)
In the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company also recorded a valuation allowance against capital losses generated in the current year.
Management determined that it was more likely than not that the Company will not generate capital gains in the carryover period to
offset the capital losses. During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company reversed a valuation allowance totaling $535,000 which
was associated with the realization of a capital loss carryforward.
It is more likely than not that all other deferred tax assets will be realized.
The tax effects of existing temporary differences that give rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
Deferred income tax assets:
Purchase accounting
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Defined benefit plans
Derivatives
Allowance for credit losses
Benefit plans
Compensation
Stock-based compensation
Uncollected interest
Depreciation
Net operating loss carryover
Capital loss carryforward
Other items
Valuation allowance
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Deferred loan fees and costs
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
Goodwill
Other items
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
8,417 $
11,668
326
94
17,376
2,432
1,616
2,937
1,484
1,691
5
313
1,048
37,739
-
37,739
620
2,882
4,560
354
8,416
29,323 $
416
5,730
11,047
2,290
1,287
2,482
1,362
268
6
329
1,049
37,934
(535)
37,399
-
6,541
4,655
723
11,919
25,480
Net deferred income tax asset
$
The Company has various state and local NOL carryforwards which will begin to expire in the year ending June 30, 2025.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax of the state of New Jersey and various
other states. The Company is generally no longer subject to examination by federal, state and local taxing authorities for tax years
prior to June 30, 2018.
F-67
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 – Commitments
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of
its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit. These transactions involve elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Bank's exposure to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is
represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments
and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since
many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of
collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the
borrower. At June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Bank had $512.2 million and $145.1 million in commitments to originate loans, including
unused lines of credit.
The Bank is party to standby letters of credit through which it guarantees certain specific business obligations of its commercial
customers. The balance of standby letters of credit at June 30, 2021 and 2020 were approximately $739,000 and $217,000,
respectively.
In addition to the commitments noted above, at June 30, 2021, the Company’s pipeline of loans held for sale included $48.4 million of
in-process loans whose terms included interest rate locks to borrowers that were paired with a best-efforts commitment to sell the loan
to a buyer at a fixed price within a predetermined timeframe after the sale commitment is established.
The Company and subsidiaries are also party to litigation which arises primarily in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, the ultimate disposition of such litigation should not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position
of the Company.
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There
are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as
of the measurement date.
Level 2:
Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, market data by correlation or
other means.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination
of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
F-68
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:
The following methods and significant assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s assets measured at fair
value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
Investment Securities Available for Sale
The Company’s available for sale investment securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the
Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data
that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data,
market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the securities’ terms and conditions, among other things. From time to
time, the Company validates prices supplied by the independent pricing service by comparison to prices obtained from third-party
sources or derived using internal models.
Derivatives
The Company has contracted with a third party vendor to provide periodic valuations for its interest rate derivatives to determine the
fair value of its interest rate caps and swaps. The vendor utilizes standard valuation methodologies applicable to interest rate
derivatives such as discounted cash flow analysis and extensions of the Black-Scholes model. Such valuations are based upon readily
observable market data and are therefore considered Level 2 valuations by the Company.
Those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Assets:
Debt securities available for sale:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Total debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale:
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Residential pass-through securities
Commercial pass-through securities
Total mortgage-backed securities
Total securities available for sale
Interest rate contracts
Total assets
Liabilities:
Interest rate contracts
Total liabilities
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
June 30, 2021
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In Thousands)
Total
-
-
-
-
-
34,603
242,989
189,880
158,351
625,823
-
-
-
-
- $
-
13,739
744,491
292,811
1,051,041
1,676,864 $
1,832
-
-
-
-
-
34,603
242,989
189,880
158,351
625,823
-
-
-
-
- $
-
13,739
744,491
292,811
1,051,041
1,676,864
1,832
- $
1,678,696 $
- $
1,678,696
- $
- $
673 $
673 $
- $
- $
673
673
$
$
$
$
F-69
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
June 30, 2020
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In Thousands)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
54,054
172,447
193,788
143,639
2,627
566,555
30,903
561,954
226,291
819,148
1,385,703
235
Total
54,054
172,447
193,788
143,639
2,627
566,555
30,903
561,954
226,291
819,148
1,385,703
235
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
- $
1,385,938 $
- $
1,385,938
- $
- $
18,177 $
18,177 $
- $
- $
18,177
18,177
Assets:
Debt securities available for sale:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
Corporate bonds
Trust preferred securities
Total debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale:
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Residential pass-through securities
Commercial pass-through securities
Total mortgage-backed securities
Total securities available for sale
Interest rate contracts
Total assets
Liabilities:
Interest rate contracts
Total liabilities
Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis:
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis at June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
Collateral Dependent Individually Analyzed / Impaired Loans:
The fair value of collateral dependent loans that are individually analyzed or were previously deemed impaired is determined based
upon the appraised fair value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell. Such collateral primarily consists of real estate and, to a
lesser extent, other business assets. Management may also adjust appraised values to reflect estimated changes in market values or
apply other adjustments to appraised values resulting from its knowledge of the collateral. Internal valuations may be utilized to
determine the fair value of other business assets. For non-collateral-dependent loans, management estimates fair value using
discounted cash flows based on inputs that are largely unobservable and instead reflect management’s own estimates of the
assumptions as a market participant would in pricing such loans. Collateral dependent individually analyzed / impaired loans are
considered a Level 3 valuation by the Company.
F-70
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned is recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost
basis. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the
appraisers’ market knowledge and experience. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated
selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If further declines in the estimated fair value of the asset occur, a write-down
is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of
changes in economic conditions.
Those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Collateral dependent loans:
Residential mortgage
Multi-family mortgage
Non-residential mortgage
Total
Other real estate owned, net:
Residential
Total
Impaired loans:
Residential mortgage
Non-residential mortgage
Commercial business
Total
Other real estate owned, net:
Residential
Total
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
June 30, 2021
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In Thousands)
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
- $
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
- $
- $
-
-
-
$
-
$
- $
3,051 $
6,932
8,679
18,662 $
3,051
6,932
8,679
18,662
178 $
178 $
178
178
June 30, 2020
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In Thousands)
- $
-
-
-
$
-
- $
2,339 $
2,282
129
4,750
$
178
178 $
Total
2,339
2,282
129
4,750
178
178
F-71
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and for
which the Company has utilized adjusted Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
Fair
Value
(In Thousands)
Valuation
Techniques
June 30, 2021
Unobservable
Input
Range
Weighted
Average
Collateral dependent loans:
Residential mortgage
$
Multi-family mortgage
Non-residential mortgage
3,051 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
6,932 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
8,679 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
(1) Adjustments to reflect current
(2) 7% - 13%
9.77%
conditions/selling costs
(1) Adjustments to reflect current
(2) 10% - 11%
10.39%
conditions/selling costs
(1) Adjustments to reflect current
(2) 9% - 16%
14.48%
conditions/selling costs
Total
$
18,662
Other real estate owned, net:
$
Residential
178 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
(3) Adjustments to reflect current
(2)
6.00%
6.00%
conditions/selling costs
Total
$
178
Fair
Value
(In Thousands)
Valuation
Techniques
June 30, 2020
Unobservable
Input
Range
Weighted
Average
Impaired loans:
Residential mortgage
$
Non-residential mortgage
Commercial business
2,339 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
2,282 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
129 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
(1) Adjustments to reflect current
(2)
7% - 9%
8.17%
conditions/selling costs
(1) Adjustments to reflect current
(2) 9% - 12%
10.27%
conditions/selling costs
(1) Adjustments to reflect current
(2)
0% - 0%
0.00%
conditions/selling costs
Total
$
4,750
Other real estate owned, net:
$
Residential
178 Market valuation of
underlying collateral
(3) Adjustments to reflect current
(2)
6.00%
6.00%
conditions/selling costs
Total
$
178
(1)
(2)
(3)
The fair value basis of impaired loans is generally determined based on an independent appraisal of the fair value of a loan’s underlying
collateral.
The fair value basis of impaired loans and other real estate owned is adjusted to reflect management estimates of selling costs including, but
not limited to, real estate brokerage commissions and title transfer fees.
The fair value basis of other real estate owned is generally determined based upon the lower of an independent appraisal of the property’s fair
value or the applicable listing price or contracted sales price.
F-72
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
At June 30, 2021, impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs comprised loans with principal balances totaling $25.2 million and
valuation allowances of $6.5 million reflecting fair values of $18.7 million. By comparison, at June 30, 2020, impaired loans valued
using Level 3 inputs comprised loans with principal balances totaling $4.8 million and valuation allowances of $89,000 reflecting fair
values of $4.8 million.
Once a loan is foreclosed, the fair value of the other real estate owned continues to be evaluated based upon the fair value of the
repossessed real estate originally securing the loan. At June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the Company held other real estate owned
totaling $178,000, respectively, whose carrying value was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs.
The following presents the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial
instruments as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
June 30, 2021
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
(In Thousands)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities available for sale
Investment securities held to maturity
Loans held-for-sale
Net loans receivable
FHLB Stock
Interest receivable
Interest rate contracts
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Borrowings
Interest payable on deposits
Interest payable on borrowings
Interest rate contracts
$
67,855 $
67,855 $
67,855 $
- $
1,676,864
38,138
16,492
4,793,229
36,615
19,362
1,832
5,485,306
685,876
145
1,335
673
1,676,864
39,610
16,934
4,830,136
-
19,362
1,832
5,490,923
701,419
145
1,335
673
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
1,676,864
39,610
16,934
-
-
4,238
1,832
3,607,560
-
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
673
-
-
-
-
4,830,136
-
15,123
-
1,883,363
701,419
49
1,335
-
F-73
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
June 30, 2020
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
(In Thousands)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities available for sale
Investment securities held to maturity
Loans held-for-sale
Net loans receivable
FHLB Stock
Interest receivable
Interest rate contracts
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Borrowings
Interest payable on deposits
Interest payable on borrowings
Interest rate contracts
$
180,967 $
180,967 $
180,967 $
- $
1,385,703
32,556
20,789
4,461,070
58,654
17,373
235
4,430,282
1,173,165
395
1,723
18,177
1,385,703
34,069
21,550
4,462,232
-
17,373
235
4,449,877
1,215,529
395
1,723
18,177
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
1,385,703
34,069
21,550
-
-
4,154
235
2,589,886
-
295
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,177
-
-
-
-
4,462,232
-
13,215
-
1,859,991
1,215,529
100
1,723
-
Commitments. The fair value of commitments to fund credit lines and originate or participate in loans held in portfolio or loans held
for sale is estimated using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements taking into account the remaining terms of the
agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, including those relating to loans
held for sale that are considered derivative instruments for financial statement reporting purposes, the fair value also considers the
difference between current levels of interest and the committed rates. The carrying value, represented by the net deferred fee arising
from the unrecognized commitment, and the fair value, determined by discounting the remaining contractual fee over the term of the
commitment using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with similar credit risk, is not considered material for
disclosure.
Limitations. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the
financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the
entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no fair value exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments,
fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and
matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the
estimates.
The fair value estimates are based on existing on-and-off balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to value anticipated
future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial assets and liabilities include premises and equipment, and advances from borrowers for
taxes and insurance. In addition, the ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant
effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
Finally, reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely due to the wide range of permitted valuation
techniques and numerous estimates which must be made given the absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial
instruments. This lack of uniform valuation methodologies introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values.
F-74
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 19 – Comprehensive Income
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income included in stockholders’ equity are as follows:
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
$
Tax effect
Net of tax amount
Fair value adjustments on derivatives
Tax effect
Net of tax amount
Benefit plan adjustments
Tax effect
Net of tax amount
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
10,011 $
(2,882)
7,129
(312)
94
(218)
(1,093)
326
(767)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
$
6,144 $
Other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are presented in the following table:
22,482
(6,541)
15,941
(19,418)
5,730
(13,688)
(1,412)
416
(996)
1,257
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
(11,704) $
22,758 $
5,973
Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on
securities available for sale
Amortization of net unrealized holding gain (loss) on
securities available for sale transferred to
held to maturity (1)
Net realized (gain) loss on securities available for sale (2)
(767)
(2,251)
-
596
291
323
Fair value adjustments on derivatives
19,106
(23,134)
(28,165)
Benefit plans:
Amortization of:
Actuarial loss (3)
Net actuarial gain (loss)
Net change in benefit plan accrued expense
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes
Tax effect
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
83
236
319
19
(348)
(329)
6,954
(2,067)
4,887 $
(2,360)
778
(1,582) $
43
(313)
(270)
(21,848)
6,152
(15,696)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Represents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in interest income on taxable securities.
Represents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in gain on sale of securities on the consolidated
statements of income.
Represents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in the computation of net periodic pension
expense. See Note 13 – Benefit Plans for additional information.
F-75
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 20 – Revenue Recognition
All of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within noninterest income. The
following table presents the Company’s sources of noninterest income for the years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019. Sources of
revenue outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such.
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
Non-interest income:
Deposit-related fees and charges
Loan-related fees and charges (1)
Gain (loss) on sale and call of securities (1)
Gain on sale of loans (1)
Loss on sale and write down of other real estate owned
Income from bank owned life insurance (1)
Electronic banking fees and charges (interchange income)
Bargain purchase gain (1)
Miscellaneous (1)
$
1,412 $
4,210
767
5,574
-
6,267
1,717
3,053
1,751
Total non-interest income
$
24,751 $
(1)
Not within the scope of ASC 606.
A description of the Company’s revenue streams accounted for under ASC 606 is as follows:
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
1,626 $
5,020
2,250
3,186
(28)
6,225
1,246
-
194
19,719 $
1,536
3,909
(323)
580
(11)
6,339
1,050
-
475
13,555
The Company earns fees from deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-
based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees, are recognized at
the time the transaction is executed at the point in the time the Company fulfills the customer’s request. Account maintenance fees,
which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the
Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service
charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.
Gains/Losses on Sales of OREO
The Company records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally
occurs at the time of an executed deed. Gain/Losses on the sales of OREO falls within the scope of ASC 606, if the Company finances
the transaction. Under ASC 606, if the Company finances the sale of OREO to the buyer, the Company is required to assess whether
the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether the collectability of the transaction price is
probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of
control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on the sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and related
gain (loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present. Generally, the Company does not finance the sale of OREO
properties.
Interchange Income
The Company earns interchange fees from debit and credit card holder transactions conducted through various payment networks.
Interchange fees from cardholder transactions are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided by
an outsourced technology solution.
F-76
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 21 – Parent Only Financial Information
Kearny Financial Corp. operates its wholly owned subsidiary Kearny Bank and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary CJB Investment
Corp. The consolidated earnings of the subsidiaries are recognized by the Company using the equity method of accounting.
Accordingly, the consolidated earnings of the subsidiaries are recorded as increases in the Company’s investment in the subsidiaries.
The following are the condensed financial statements for Kearny Financial Corp. (Parent Company only) as of June 30, 2021 and
2020, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2021.
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
Assets
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions
Investment securities available for sale
Loans receivable
Investment in subsidiary
Other assets
Total Assets
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Other liabilities
Stockholders' equity
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
June 30,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
66,191 $
15,000
29,959
932,004
624
$
1,043,778 $
42,632
15,000
31,661
994,696
1,109
1,085,098
834
1,042,944
1,043,778 $
921
1,084,177
1,085,098
$
Condensed Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Dividends from subsidiary
Interest income
Equity in undistributed (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
Total income
Directors' compensation
Other expenses
Total expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
Comprehensive income
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
178,918 $
1,993
(114,969)
65,942
30,039 $
2,108
14,984
47,131
255,117
2,162
(212,868)
44,411
308
2,660
2,968
62,974
(259)
63,233 $
68,120 $
332
1,853
2,185
44,946
(19)
44,965 $
43,383 $
340
1,922
2,262
42,149
7
42,142
26,446
$
$
F-77
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 21 – Parent Only Financial Information (continued)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Decrease (increase) in other assets
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Repayment of loan to ESOP
Sale of investment securities available for sale
Outlays for business acquisitions
Other, net
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Investing Activities
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Exercise of stock options
Cash dividends paid
Repurchase and cancellation of common stock of Kearny Financial Corp.
Cancellation of shares repurchased on vesting to pay taxes
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending
2021
Years Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands)
2019
$
63,233 $
44,965 $
42,142
114,969
484
160
178,846
(14,984)
(583)
(50)
29,348
212,868
1,116
(9)
256,117
1,702
-
(9,008)
118
(7,188)
1,645
-
-
-
1,645
1,596
-
-
-
1,596
373
(28,648)
(119,021)
(803)
(148,099)
23,559
42,632
66,191 $
-
(24,121)
(69,782)
(1,083)
(94,986)
(63,993)
106,625
42,632 $
423
(34,747)
(141,708)
(989)
(177,021)
80,692
25,933
106,625
$
F-78
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 22 – Net Income per Common Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares actually outstanding, including both vested and unvested
restricted stock awards, adjusted for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares not yet committed to be released. Diluted EPS
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, such as outstanding stock options,
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the
Company. Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding to include the
effect of contracts or securities exercisable or which could be converted into common stock, if dilutive, using the treasury stock
method. Shares issued and reacquired during any period are weighted for the portion of the period they were outstanding.
The following schedule shows the Company’s earnings per share calculations for the periods presented:
Net income
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic
Effect of dilutive securities
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding- diluted
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
2021
For the Year Ended June 30,
2020
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2019
63,233 $
44,965 $
42,142
82,387
4
82,391
82,409
21
82,430
0.77 $
0.77 $
0.55 $
0.55 $
91,054
46
91,100
0.46
0.46
$
$
$
Stock options for 3,246,138, 3,115,000 and 3,269,000 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per
share at June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, because they were considered anti-dilutive.
F-79
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 23 – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
The following is a condensed summary of quarterly results of operations for the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses
Net interest income after provision for (reversal of)
credit losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Income before income taxes
Income taxes
Net Income
Net income per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
First
Quarter
September 30
Year Ended June 30, 2021
Third
Second
Quarter
Quarter
December 31
March 31
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Fourth
Quarter
June 30
$
$
$
$
60,884 $
16,722
44,162
4,059
40,103
7,733
33,573
14,263
2,884
11,379 $
58,393 $
13,840
44,553
(1,365)
45,918
7,154
30,510
22,562
5,614
16,948 $
58,313 $
10,682
47,631
1,126
46,505
5,466
29,816
22,155
5,732
16,423 $
56,770
8,607
48,163
(4,941)
53,104
4,398
31,986
25,516
7,033
18,483
0.13 $
0.13 $
0.20
0.20
$
$
0.20 $
0.20 $
0.24
0.24
86,008
86,009
85,120
85,123
80,673
80,690
77,658
77,680
Dividends declared per common share
$
0.08 $
0.08 $
0.09 $
0.10
F-80
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 23 – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) (continued)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses
Net interest income after (reversal of) provision for
loan losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Income before income taxes
Income taxes
Net Income
Net income per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
First
Quarter
September 30
Year Ended June 30, 2020
Third
Second
Quarter
Quarter
December 31
March 31
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Fourth
Quarter
June 30
$
$
$
$
59,899 $
23,212
36,687
(782)
37,469
3,962
26,244
15,187
3,817
11,370 $
57,182 $
22,575
34,607
(1,465)
36,072
4,554
26,427
14,199
3,547
10,652 $
58,776 $
21,166
37,610
6,270
31,340
6,201
28,062
9,479
225
9,254 $
57,351
16,901
40,450
174
40,276
5,002
26,891
18,387
4,698
13,689
0.13 $
0.13 $
0.13
0.13
$
$
0.11 $
0.11 $
0.17
0.17
84,756
84,793
82,831
82,876
81,339
81,358
80,678
80,680
Dividends declared per common share
$
0.06 $
0.07 $
0.08 $
0.08
F-81
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Dated: August 27, 2021
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP.
By:
/s/ Craig L. Montanaro
Craig L. Montanaro
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on August 27, 2021 on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
/s/ Craig L. Montanaro
Craig L. Montanaro
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Keith Suchodolski
Keith Suchodolski
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Theodore J. Aanensen
Theodore J. Aanensen
Director
/s/ John N. Hopkins
John N. Hopkins
Director
/s/ John J. Mazur, Jr.
John J. Mazur, Jr.
Director
/s/ John F. McGovern
John F. McGovern
Director
/s/ Christopher Petermann
Christopher Petermann
Director
/s/ John F. Regan
John F. Regan
Director
/s/ Raymond E. Chandonnet
Raymond E. Chandonnet
Director
/s/ Catherine A. Lawton
Catherine A. Lawton
Director
/s/ Joseph P. Mazza
Joseph P. Mazza
Director
/s/ Leopold W. Montanaro
Leopold W. Montanaro
Director
/s/ Charles J. Pivirotto
Charles J. Pivirotto
Director