Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Insurance - Property & Casualty / Kinsale Capital Group

Kinsale Capital Group

knsl · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker knsl
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Insurance - Property & Casualty
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Kinsale Capital Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024
or
☐    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number 001-37848
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
98-0664337
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
2035 Maywill Street, Suite 100
Richmond, Virginia 23230
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(804) 289-1300
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
KNSL
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes  ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company”  in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large Accelerated Filer
☒
Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company
☐
Emerging growth
company
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under
Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an
error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s
executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the shares of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2024 was approximately $7,793,514,938.
The number of the registrant’s common shares outstanding was 23,277,395 as of February 14, 2025.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2025 annual meeting of stockholders (the "2025 Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The 2025 Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
PART I
Item 1.
Business
1
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
21
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
35
Item 1C.
Cybersecurity
35
Item 2.
Properties
35
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
36
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
36
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
37
Item 6.
Reserved
40
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
40
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
65
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
67
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
114
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
114
Item 9B.
Other Information
114
Item 9C.
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
115
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
116
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
116
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
116
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
116
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
116
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
117
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
117
i

Table of Contents
Unless the context requires otherwise, the words "Kinsale," the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-
looking statements include any statement that does not directly relate to historical or current fact. These statements may discuss, among others, our future
financial performance, our business prospects and strategy, our anticipated financial position, liquidity and capital, dividends and general market and industry
conditions. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "projects,"
"believes," "seeks," "outlook," "future," "will," "would," "should," "could," "may," "can have" and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are based on
management’s current expectations and assumptions about future events, which are subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult
to predict. These statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by
a forward-looking statement. Factors that may cause such differences include, without limitation:
•
the possibility that our loss reserves may be inadequate to cover our actual losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows;
•
the inherent uncertainty of models resulting in actual losses that are materially different than our estimates;
•
the failure of any of the loss limitations or exclusions we employ, or change in other claims or coverage issues, having a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations;
•
the inability to obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable prices and on terms that adequately protect us;
•
the possibility that severe weather conditions and catastrophes, including due to climate change, pandemics and similar events adversely affecting our
business, results of operations and financial condition;
•
adverse economic factors, including recession, inflation, periods of high unemployment or lower economic activity resulting in the sale of fewer
policies than expected or an increase in frequency or severity of claims and premium defaults or both, affecting our growth and profitability;
•
a decline in our financial strength rating adversely affecting the amount of business we write;
•
the potential loss of one or more key executives or an inability to attract and retain qualified personnel adversely affecting our results of operations;
•
our reliance on a select group of brokers;
•
the changing market conditions of our excess and surplus lines ("E&S") insurance operations, as well as the cyclical nature of our business, affecting
our financial performance;
•
our employees taking excessive risks;
•
the intense competition for business in our industry;
•
the effects of litigation having an adverse effect on our business;
•
the performance of our investment portfolio adversely affecting our financial results;
•
the ability to pay dividends being dependent on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other permitted payments from our insurance subsidiary;
ii

Table of Contents
•
being forced to sell investments to meet our liquidity requirements;
•
our credit agreements contain a number of financial and other covenants, the breach of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due
under our borrowings;
•
extensive regulation adversely affecting our ability to achieve our business objectives or the failure to comply with these regulations adversely
affecting our financial condition and results of operations;
•
the other risks and uncertainties discussed in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. Except as expressly required under federal securities laws or the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), we do not assume any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements
attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.
iii

Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
Kinsale is a property and casualty insurance company that focuses exclusively on the excess and surplus lines ("E&S") market in the U.S., where we can use
our underwriting expertise to write coverages for hard-to-place risks. We sell these insurance products in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands primarily through a network of independent insurance brokers. Our experienced and cohesive
management team has an average of over 30 years of relevant experience.
Our goal is to deliver long-term value for our stockholders by growing our business and generating attractive returns. We seek to accomplish this by generating
consistent and attractive underwriting profits while managing our capital prudently. Using our proprietary technology platform and leveraging the expertise of
our highly-experienced employees in our daily operations, we have built a company that is entrepreneurial and highly efficient. We believe our systems and
technology are at the digital forefront of the insurance industry and allow us to quickly collect and analyze data, thereby improving our ability to manage our
business and reduce our response times to our customers. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves from our competitors by effectively leveraging
technology, vigilantly controlling expenses and maintaining control over our underwriting and claims operations.
We have significantly grown our business and have generated strong returns. During 2024, our gross written premiums increased by 19.2%, to $1.9 billion for
the year ended December 31, 2024. Our return on equity and combined ratios were 32.3% and 76.4%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our
operating return on equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 29.2% for the year ended December 31, 2024. We believe that we are well positioned to
continue to capitalize on attractive opportunities in our target market and to prudently grow our business. See "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of net income to net operating
earnings and calculations using net operating earnings (e.g., operating return on equity).
The following table compares stockholder returns of Kinsale to those of the S&P 500.
Kinsale's Performance vs. the S&P 500
Annual Percentage Change 
Year
Kinsale 
S&P 500
2016
113.5 
4.2 
2017
33.2 
21.8 
2018
24.1 
(4.4)
2019
83.7 
31.5 
2020
97.3 
18.4 
2021
19.2 
28.7 
2022
10.2 
(18.1)
2023
28.3 
26.3 
2024
39.1 
25.0 
Compounded Annual Gain ─ 2016-2024
49.7 %
14.6 %
Overall Gain ─ 2016-2024
2,893.5 %
214.3 %
Data for 2016 begins with Kinsale's initial public offering date of July 28, 2016 and assumes reinvestment of dividends.
Returns are calculated from the initial public offering price of $16.00 per share.
(1)
(2)
(1) 
(2) 
1

Table of Contents
Our Products
We write a broad array of insurance coverages for risks that are unusual or hard to place in the standard insurance market. Typical E&S risks include newly
established companies or industries, high-risk operations, insureds in litigious venues or companies with poor loss histories. We target classes of business
where our underwriters have extensive experience allowing us to compete effectively and earn attractive returns. Our underwriters specialize in individual lines
of business which allows them to develop in-depth knowledge and experience of the risks they underwrite. Our core client focus is small- to medium-sized
accounts, which we believe are subject to less competition and have better pricing. The average premium per policy written by us in 2024 was $15,100.
Excluding our personal insurance division, which has a relatively low premium per policy written, the average premium per policy written was $15,900 in
2024. We believe that our strategy, experience and expertise allow us to compete effectively in the E&S market and will enable us to generate attractive long-
term stockholder value.
In 2024, the percentage breakdown of our gross written premiums was 67.4% casualty and 32.6% property. Our commercial lines offerings and homeowner's
coverage in the personal lines market represented 97.4% and 2.6% of our gross written premiums, respectively.
The following table provides a summary of gross premiums written by division for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
($ in thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial Property
$
456,170 
24.4 % $
411,956 
26.3 % $
181,505 
16.5 %
Excess Casualty
245,137 
13.1 %
194,049 
12.4 %
147,485 
13.4 %
Small Business Casualty
195,593 
10.5 %
174,080 
11.1 %
149,366 
13.6 %
General Casualty
169,162 
9.0 %
118,745 
7.6 %
69,784 
6.3 %
Construction
148,333 
7.9 %
137,887 
8.8 %
122,524 
11.1 %
Allied Health
83,058 
4.5 %
67,808 
4.3 %
58,839 
5.4 %
Small Business Property
76,800 
4.1 %
43,893 
2.8 %
21,002 
1.9 %
Products Liability
67,035 
3.6 %
61,786 
3.9 %
60,374 
5.5 %
Entertainment
58,506 
3.1 %
39,218 
2.5 %
22,268 
2.0 %
Energy
42,710 
2.3 %
38,637 
2.5 %
32,217 
2.9 %
All other commercial lines
278,903 
14.9 %
242,279 
15.4 %
202,178 
18.3 %
Total commercial
1,821,407 
97.4 %
1,530,338 
97.6 %
1,067,542 
96.9 %
Personal:
High Value Homeowners
26,844 
1.4 %
14,295 
0.9 %
3,261 
0.3 %
Personal Insurance
22,090 
1.2 %
24,182 
1.5 %
31,289 
2.8 %
Total personal
$
48,934 
2.6 % $
38,477 
2.4 % $
34,550 
3.1 %
Total gross written premiums
$
1,870,341 
100.0 % $
1,568,815 
100.0 % $
1,102,092 
100.0 %
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that our competitive strengths include:
Exclusive focus on the E&S market. The E&S, or non-admitted, market has historically operated at lower loss ratios and higher margins, and has grown direct
premiums written more quickly than the standard, or admitted, market. From 2001 to 2023, A.M. Best Company's ("A.M. Best") domestic professional surplus
lines composite produced an average net loss and loss adjustment expense ratio of 69.0% and grew direct premiums written by 9.8% annually, versus 73.7%
and 4.5%, respectively for the property and casualty ("P&C") industry.
2

Table of Contents
Underwriting expertise across a broad spectrum of hard-to-place risks. We have a broad appetite to underwrite a diverse set of risks across the E&S market.
Our underwriting team is highly experienced, and individually underwrites each risk to appropriately price and structure solutions. We balance our broad risk
appetite by maintaining a diversified book of smaller accounts with strong pricing and well-defined coverages. Unlike many of our competitors, we do not
extend underwriting authority to brokers, agents or other third parties. For the year ended December 31, 2024, our loss and loss adjustment expense ratio was
55.8%.
Technology is a core competency. As an insurance company that was founded in 2009, we have the benefit of having built, and continuing to enhance, a
proprietary technology platform that reflects the best practices our management team has learned from its extensive experience. We operate on an integrated
digital platform with a data warehouse that collects an array of statistical data. Our platform provides a high degree of efficiency, accuracy and speed across all
of our processes. We are able to use the data that we collect to quickly analyze trends across all functions in our business. Our customized proprietary systems
help us to reduce the risk of administrative errors in our policy forms and include all of the necessary exclusions for the specified risk, and provides for the
efficient and accurate handling of claims. Additionally, our systems enable us to rapidly respond to brokers, allowing our underwriters to reply to many of our
submissions within 24 hours, a significant benefit to our brokers. While our technology offers a competitive advantage, we also recognize that more modern
technologies provide solutions for increased automation and efficiency; as such, we continue to dedicate resources to maintain and improve our technology. We
believe that our approach to technological advancement will provide us with an enduring competitive advantage as it allows us to quickly respond to market
opportunities, and will continue to scale as our business grows.
Significantly lower expense ratio than our competitors. Expense management is ingrained in our business culture. We believe that the combination of our
proprietary technology platform and our expense management allows us to process quotes, underwrite policies and operate with a substantial cost advantage
over our direct competitors. In particular, our efficient platform allows us to provide a higher level of service to our brokers and to target smaller accounts
which we believe are generally subject to less competition. For the year ended December 31, 2024, our expense ratio was 20.6%.
Fully integrated claims management. We believe that actively managing our claims results in more favorable outcomes and a higher degree of reserve
accuracy. We manage all of our claims in-house and do not delegate claims management authority to third parties. We promptly and thoroughly investigate all
claims, generally through direct contact with the insured, and leverage both our systems and our underwriters to gather the relevant facts. As necessary, we
employ local counsel in defense of our policy holders and independent adjusters for task assignments. When we believe claims are without merit, we
vigorously contest payment. We currently average 90 open claims per claims adjuster (88 open claims per claims adjuster excluding catastrophe claims), which
we believe is lower than industry average. As of December 31, 2024, our reserves for claims incurred but not reported were approximately 90.0% of our total
net loss reserves. Of the total open claims as of December 31, 2024, 17.2% were open for accident years 2020 and prior.
Entrepreneurial management team with a track record of success. Our management team is highly experienced with an average of over 30 years of relevant
experience, bringing together a full suite of underwriting, claims, technology and operating skills that we believe will drive our long-term success. The majority
of our management team has a proven track record of successfully building high-performing specialty insurance companies. We are led by Michael Kehoe who,
prior to founding Kinsale, was the president and chief executive officer of James River Insurance Company from 2002 until 2008. Prior to James River
Insurance Company, Mr. Kehoe held several senior positions at Colony Insurance Company. Many of our other employees and members of our management
team worked with Mr. Kehoe at James River Insurance Company and have decades of experience at other E&S insurance companies. As meaningful owners of
Kinsale, we believe our management team has closely-aligned interests with our stockholders.
Our Board of Directors has deep insurance and financial services industry experience. Our Board of Directors is comprised of accomplished industry
veterans. Collectively, our board members bring decades of experience from their prior roles operating and working in insurance and other financial services
companies.
Our Strategy
We believe that our approach to our business will allow us to achieve our goals of both growing our business and generating attractive returns. Our approach
involves:
3

Table of Contents
Expand our presence in the E&S market. According to A.M. Best, the total E&S market was approximately $115.6 billion of direct written premiums in 2023.
Based on our 2024 gross written premiums of $1.9 billion, our current market share is approximately 1.6%. We believe that our exclusive focus on the E&S
market and our high levels of service, including our ability to quote, underwrite and bind insurance policies in a timely manner through our efficient systems,
allow us to better serve our brokers and position us to profitably increase our market share.
Generate underwriting profits. We focus on underwriting profitability regardless of market cycles. Our strategy is to concentrate on hard-to-place risks and to
maintain adequate rate levels for the risks that we underwrite. We maintain control over our underwriting process to ensure consistent quality of work. We
underwrite each account individually and never delegate authority to any outside agents or brokers.
Maintain a contrarian risk appetite. Our flexibility as an E&S insurer enables us to write business at attractive returns while offering competitive policies to
our brokers and insureds. We believe we distinguish ourselves in the market with our contrarian risk appetite and our willingness to offer terms on risks
requiring more extensive underwriting that some of our competitors may decline to consider. Such accounts frequently offer us a better return than those
preferred by our competitors due to reduced competition.
Leverage investment in technology to drive efficiencies. We use a proprietary technology platform to drive a high level of efficiency, accuracy and speed in
our underwriting and quoting process. We have organized our workflows, designed our systems and aligned our staff to provide superior service levels to
brokers while achieving a level of efficiency that we believe provides us with a competitive advantage and helps contribute to our low expense ratio. We
believe that automation also reduces human error in our underwriting, policy processing, accounting, collections, and claims adjusting processes. Additionally,
we are able to track quotes, monitor historical loss experience and reserve development, and measure other relevant metrics at a granular level of detail. We
believe that our technology approach is scalable and will allow us to maintain a low expense ratio as we continue to organically grow our business.
Maintain a strong balance sheet. In order to maintain the confidence of policyholders, brokers, reinsurers, investors, regulators and rating agencies, we seek to
establish and maintain a conservative balance sheet. We have a robust process for setting our loss reserves and regularly reviewing our estimates. In addition,
we maintain a conservative investment portfolio. Our strong balance sheet allows us to maintain the confidence of our investors and other constituencies, and
thereby position ourselves to better achieve our goals.
Our Structure
The chart below displays our corporate structure:
Kinsale Capital Group,
Inc.
(Delaware corporation)
Kinsale Management,
Inc.
(Delaware corporation;
management services
company)
Kinsale Insurance
Company
(Arkansas corporation;
stock insurance
company)
Aspera Insurance
Services, Inc.
(Virginia corporation;
insurance broker)
Kinsale Real Estate, Inc.
(Delaware corporation; real
estate holding company)
2001 Maywill, LLC
(Delaware limited liability
company; real estate
entity)
2000 Maywill, LLC
(Delaware limited
liability company; real
estate entity)
4

Table of Contents
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc., a Delaware domiciled insurance holding company, was formed on June 3, 2009 for the purpose of acquiring and managing
insurance entities. Prior to September 5, 2014, the Company was a Bermuda registered holding company, formerly known as Kinsale Capital Group, Ltd.
("KCGL"). Effective September 5, 2014, KCGL was re-domesticated from Bermuda to Delaware. A wholly-owned subsidiary of KCGL, Kinsale Capital
Group, Inc., which was formed on June 4, 2009 as a U.S. holding company, was immediately merged into the re-domesticated entity and Kinsale Capital
Group, Ltd. changed its name to Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
On June 4, 2009, we incorporated Kinsale Management, Inc. ("Kinsale Management") as a wholly-owned subsidiary domiciled in Delaware, in order to
provide management services to all of our U.S.-based subsidiaries.
On February 5, 2010, we acquired American Healthcare Specialty Insurance Company and changed its name to Kinsale Insurance Company ("Kinsale
Insurance"). Kinsale Insurance is an Arkansas-domiciled insurance company and is eligible to operate on an excess and surplus lines basis in 50 states, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
On August 21, 2013, we established Aspera Insurance Services, Inc. ("Aspera"), an insurance broker. Aspera is domiciled in Virginia and is authorized to
conduct business in Virginia, Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas,
Vermont and Washington.
On December 3, 2018, we incorporated Kinsale Real Estate, Inc. ("Kinsale Real Estate"), as a wholly-owned subsidiary domiciled in Delaware, in order to
acquire and hold real estate.
On December 3, 2018, we formed 2001 Maywill, LLC, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kinsale Real Estate, domiciled in Delaware, in order to hold our
corporate headquarters.
On September 8, 2022, we formed 2000 Maywill, LLC, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kinsale Real Estate, domiciled in Delaware, in order to acquire and
hold real estate investment property.
Marketing and Distribution
We market our products through a broad group of independent brokers. We also sell policies through our wholly-owned broker, Aspera. In 2024, Aspera
distributed 1.3% of Kinsale’s premiums, primarily manufactured housing risks within our personal insurance division. Kinsale does not grant its independent
brokers any underwriting or claims authority.
We select our brokers based on management's review of the experience, knowledge and business plan of each broker. Many of our brokers have more than one
office, and we may appoint some but not all offices owned by a broker. We seek brokers with business plans that are consistent with our strategy and
underwriting objectives. Our underwriters regularly visit with brokers in their offices in order to market and discuss the products we offer.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, our largest brokers were RSG Specialty, LLC, which produced $366.4 million, or 19.6%, of our gross written
premiums, AmWINS Brokerage, which produced $325.5 million, or 17.4% of our gross written premiums and CRC Commercial Solutions, which produced
$213.9 million, or 11.4%, of our gross written premiums. No other broker accounted for more than 10% of our gross written premiums in the year ended
December 31, 2024.
It is important to us that we maintain excellent relationships with our brokers. Commissions are an important part of that relationship, but brokers will also
typically consider the ultimate price to the insured, and the service and expertise offered by the carrier when determining where to place their business. In 2024,
we paid an average commission to our brokers of 14.7% of gross written premiums. We believe this is slightly lower than the average commission paid by our
competitors. We believe that our specialization in hard-to-place risks, combined with our high degree of service, including our rapid response times, permits us
to manage our commission expense as part of our overall management of the underwriting process. Additionally, we do not contract out our underwriting to
program managers or general agents which typically requires a higher commission level to compensate the third party for its work on behalf of the carrier.
5

Table of Contents
We sell policies in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The following tables show our gross
written premiums by state for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Year Ended December 31,
2024
% of Total
2023
% of Total
2022
% of Total
($ in thousands)
Gross written premiums by state:
California
$
352,082 
18.8 %
$
295,242 
18.8 %
$
221,994 
20.1 %
Florida
291,849 
15.6 %
266,153 
17.0 %
186,891 
17.0 %
Texas
250,200 
13.4 %
198,758 
12.7 %
136,309 
12.4 %
New York
80,144 
4.3 %
66,489 
4.2 %
42,427 
3.9 %
Louisiana
56,819 
3.0 %
49,970 
3.2 %
30,981 
2.8 %
Washington
51,588 
2.8 %
46,507 
3.0 %
40,546 
3.7 %
Colorado
50,734 
2.7 %
43,852 
2.8 %
32,406 
2.9 %
New Jersey
47,057 
2.5 %
42,061 
2.7 %
30,425 
2.8 %
Georgia
43,478 
2.3 %
36,585 
2.3 %
23,539 
2.1 %
Pennsylvania
41,494 
2.2 %
33,333 
2.1 %
23,396 
2.1 %
All other states
604,896 
32.4 %
489,865 
31.2 %
333,178 
30.2 %
$
1,870,341 
100.0 %
$
1,568,815 
100.0 %
$
1,102,092 
100.0 %
Underwriting
Our underwriting department consisted of approximately 330 employees as of December 31, 2024. We use our proprietary technology platform to drive a high
level of efficiency, accuracy and speed in our underwriting and quoting process. We believe our internal business processing systems allow us to maintain a
high ratio of underwriters to total employees, as we do not require a significant number of administrative personnel to facilitate our underwriting process. We
also believe that our digital environment allows us to engage fewer employees in policy administration.
We aim to issue quotes for the majority of new business submissions we receive. For certain submissions, we preemptively offer additional quotes for
additional coverage. For example, if we receive a submission requesting primary coverage, we may also issue a quote for excess coverage. These quotes are
included in new business submissions. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we processed approximately 881,000 new business submissions, and of those
submissions, we issued approximately 590,000 quotes for a new quote ratio of 67.0% and bound 64,000 policies for a new policy to new submission ratio of
7.3%. We are careful to establish terms that are suited to the risk and the pricing of our policies. As an E&S company, we use our freedom of rate and form
assertively in order to appropriately underwrite risks that have already been rejected by standard carriers constrained by approved forms and filed rates.
We endeavor to craft policies that offer affordable and appropriate protection to address our insureds' exposures while also constructing coverage such that
potential losses are more predictable and claims cost can be best managed.
Claims
Our claims department consisted of approximately 90 claims professionals who had an average of 9 years of claims experience in the industry as of
December 31, 2024. Our Chief Claims Officer has over 30 years of litigation and claims experience in large commercial insurance claims departments. Our
claims department is fully integrated with our other functional departments. We manage all of our claims in-house and do not delegate claims management
authority to third parties.
We focus on the effective management of the claims adjusting process. This process is achieved by extending low reserve and settlement authority levels to our
front-line claim examiners; keeping the adjuster-to-supervisor ratios low to allow for greater supervision over the adjusting process; and monitoring the number
of claims handled by each claims examiner. This method ensures that two or more members of the department participate in the decision-making process when
6

Table of Contents
appropriate; our claim examiners recognize and address key issues; and reserves are adjusted to the appropriate amount, as necessary. We seek to manage the
number of claims per claims examiner to allow our claim examiners sufficient time to review and investigate claims submitted. Moreover, prior to any
scheduled mediation or trial, claims personnel conduct further peer review to ensure that issues and exposures have been adequately analyzed. In addition, our
claim examiners work closely with members of the underwriting staff to keep them apprised of claim trends. Vendor management is also important, and our
claim examiners work closely with our vendors to manage expenses and costs.
Information Technology
Our information technology department consisted of approximately 130 employees and contractors as of December 31, 2024. Our Chief Information Officer
has over 30 years of experience in the technology field. Our information technology staff utilizes an agile methodology and cloud strategy to develop best-in-
class software solutions and to attract and retain quality staff.
We have built a proprietary technology platform that reflects the best practices our management team has learned from its extensive experience. Our platform is
comprised of multiple applications and services which comprise an integrated system. Key applications and services supporting the core business were
developed in-house. We designed the architecture for our information systems in a fashion that would allow us to reduce our administrative costs and quickly
provide us with useful information. Our insurance company subsidiary operates in a digital environment, which reduces the costs of printing, storing and
handling thousands of documents each week. Moreover, by maintaining electronic files on each account, we have been able to facilitate clear communication
among personnel responsible for handling matters related to underwriting, servicing and claims as each has access to the necessary information regarding an
account.
We use a web-based platform approach to develop applications. When a broker submits a request for insurance, the information is processed through our web-
based intake and underwriting systems. This eliminates costly data-entry steps in our underwriting process and permits the underwriter to focus on
underwriting the account accurately and rapidly.
Since inception, we have been intent on capturing and analyzing our data and building, over time, a robust repository of information that we can use to improve
our decision making. We refer to this repository as our data warehouse. The design of our data warehouse permits us to capture an array of statistical data,
collected by the policy management systems at Kinsale. The data warehouse is easily searchable, collects and labels information in a consistent format and
contains key underwriting and claims information we collect at every level. The data warehouse permits us flexibility with regard to analyzing our business by
segment or in the aggregate. We believe the proprietary technology platform, which includes the data warehouse, is a competitive advantage for us.
Reserve Development
We maintain reserves for specific claims incurred and reported and for claims incurred but not reported. We continually monitor and adjust our reserves as
necessary using new information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. Anticipated inflation is reflected implicitly in the reserving process
through analysis of cost trends and the review of historical development. We do not discount our reserves to reflect the estimated present value. However, our
ultimate liability may be greater or less than current reserves and there is always the risk that reserves may prove inadequate.
See "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates — Reserves for Unpaid
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses" and Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of estimates and assumptions related to the
reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses.
Catastrophe Risk Management
We use stochastic models to analyze the risk of severe losses from natural catastrophes. We measure exposure to these losses in terms of probable maximum
loss ("PML"), which is an estimate of the amount of loss we would expect to meet or exceed once in a given number of years (referred to as the return period).
When managing our catastrophe exposure, we focus on the 100-year and the 250-year return periods. Our main catastrophe risk arises from hurricanes. We
manage catastrophe exposure through:
7

Table of Contents
•
careful and disciplined underwriting,
•
purchasing extensive reinsurance protection from financially strong counterparties,
•
analyzing results of catastrophe modeling for our business portfolio on monthly basis, and
•
limiting the concentration of property business by geographic area to reduce loss exposure from extreme events.
We mitigate catastrophe exposure by implementing certain aggregate risk management guidelines for our overall property business. For instance, these
guidelines limit the exposed property values within a specified geographic radius, which in turn limits the gross and net PML. In addition to our aggregate risk
management guidelines, we tactically write policies using limits in order to minimize exposure to large losses. While specific limits change over time as our
risk appetite changes due to growth, the majority of our property business is written with policy limits of $5.0 million and lower. Our insurance policies are
also generally written for one year and repriced annually to reflect changing exposures, including changes in frequency and severity of weather-related claims.
Increased frequency and severity of natural catastrophes drive increased volatility for insurers. It also causes standard insurers to push more catastrophe
exposed business into the E&S market thereby increasing our business opportunity. E&S companies are better able to manage the volatility associated with
catastrophe risk given their regulatory freedom of rate and form allowing for maximum flexibility in restricting coverage and charging higher rates.
Reinsurance
We enter into reinsurance contracts primarily to limit our exposure to potential large losses. Reinsurance involves an insurance company transferring ("ceding")
a portion of its exposure on a risk to another insurer, the reinsurer. The reinsurer assumes the exposure in return for a portion of the premium. Our reinsurance
is primarily contracted under quota-share reinsurance and excess of loss treaties. In quota-share reinsurance, the reinsurer agrees to assume a specified
percentage of the ceding company's losses arising out of a defined class of business in exchange for a corresponding percentage of premiums, net of a ceding
commission. In excess of loss reinsurance, the reinsurer agrees to assume all or a portion of the ceding company's losses, in excess of a specified amount.
Under excess of loss reinsurance, the premium payable to the reinsurer is negotiated by the parties based on their assessment of the amount of risk being ceded
to the reinsurer because the reinsurer does not share proportionately in the ceding company's losses.
We renew our reinsurance treaties annually. During each renewal cycle, there are a number of factors we consider when determining our reinsurance coverage,
including (1) plans to change the underlying insurance coverage we offer, (2) trends in loss activity, (3) the level of our capital and surplus, (4) changes in our
risk appetite and (5) the cost and availability of reinsurance coverage.
As previously discussed, when managing our catastrophe exposure, we generally focus on the 100-year and the 250-year return periods. We mitigate our risk
associated with natural catastrophes with respect to our property insurance business primarily by purchasing reinsurance from only highly-rated reinsurers. We
utilize a commercial lines quota-share reinsurance treaty combined with a catastrophe reinsurance treaty as an efficient and cost-effective way to manage the
total loss exposure on our property coverages.
The following is a summary of our significant reinsurance programs as of December 31, 2024:
Line of Business Covered
Company Policy Limit
Reinsurance Coverage
Company Retention
Property (1)
Up to $10.0 million per occurrence
50% up to $379.8 million per
catastrophe
50% of commercial property losses
Property - catastrophe (2)
N/A
$175.0 million excess of $60.0
million
$60.0 million per catastrophe
Primary casualty (3)
Up to $10.0 million per occurrence
$8.0 million excess of $2.0 million
$2.0 million per occurrence
Excess casualty (4)
Up to $10.0 million per occurrence
Variable quota share
$2.5 million per occurrence as
described in note (4) below
8

Table of Contents
(1)    Our property quota-share reinsurance reduces the financial impact of property losses on our commercial property, small business property, high value
homeowners and inland marine policies up to a loss recovery of $189.9 million for an event. This reinsurance is not applicable to any individual policy
with a limit of $2.0 million or less.
(2)    Our property catastrophe reinsurance reduces the financial impact of a catastrophe event involving multiple claims and policyholders. Our property
catastrophe reinsurance includes a reinstatement provision which requires us to pay reinstatement premiums after a loss has occurred in order to preserve
coverage. Including the reinstatement of coverage, the maximum aggregate loss recovery limit is $350.0 million. This coverage applies after the coverage
provided by the commercial property quota-share treaty.
(3)    This reinsurance is not applicable to any individual policy with a per-occurrence limit of $2.0 million or less.
(4)    For excess casualty policies with a per-occurrence limit higher than $2.5 million, the ceding percentage varies such that the retention is always $2.5
million or less. For example, for a $5.0 million limit excess policy, our retention would be 50%, whereas for a $10.0 million limit excess policy, our
retention would be 25%. For policies for which we also write an underlying primary limit, the combined retention on the primary and excess policies
would not exceed $2.5 million. This reinsurance is not applicable to any individual policy with a per-occurrence limit of $2.5 million or less.
Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us from our obligations to policyholders. Failure of the reinsurer to honor its obligation could result in losses to us, and
therefore, we established an allowance for credit risk based on historical analysis of credit losses for highly rated companies in the insurance industry. In
formulating our reinsurance programs, we are selective in our choice of reinsurers and we consider numerous factors, the most important of which are the
financial stability of the reinsurer, its history of responding to claims and its overall reputation. In an effort to minimize our exposure to the insolvency of our
reinsurers, we review the financial condition of each reinsurer annually. In addition, we continually monitor for rating downgrades involving any of our
reinsurers. At December 31, 2024, all reinsurance contracts that our insurance subsidiary was party to were with companies with A.M. Best ratings of "A-"
(Excellent) or better. At December 31, 2024, we recorded an allowance for credit losses of $0.9 million related to our reinsurance balances.
We had reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses of $323.1 million at December 31, 2024, and recoverables on paid losses of $14.8 million at December 31,
2024. The following table provides a summary of our top ten reinsurers, based on the amount recoverable, at December 31, 2024:
Reinsurers
A.M. Best Rating
Reinsurance
Recoverable
($ in thousands)
Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.
A+
$
83,828 
General Reinsurance Corporation
A++
37,561 
Swiss Reinsurance America Corp.
A+
34,262 
SCOR Reinsurance Co.
A
29,975 
Hannover Rück SE
A+
20,476 
Odyssey Reinsurance Co.
A+
20,013 
Arch Reinsurance Co.
A+
19,227 
Allied World Insurance Co.
A
18,617 
Arch Reinsurance Ltd.
A+
18,182 
Berkley Insurance Co.
A+
17,603 
Total for top ten reinsurers
299,744 
All others, net of allowance for credit losses
38,147 
Total reinsurance recoverable
$
337,891 
We did not have reinsurance recoverables greater than $14.2 million at December 31, 2024 from any individual reinsurer other than the ten listed above.
9

Table of Contents
To reduce credit exposure to reinsurance recoverable balances, we obtain letters of credit from certain reinsurers that are not authorized as reinsurers under U.S.
state insurance regulations. In addition, under the terms of our reinsurance contracts discussed above, we may retain funds due from reinsurers as security for
those recoverable balances.
Investments
Investment income is an important component of our earnings. We collect premiums from our insureds and invest a portion of these funds until claims are paid.
Our cash and invested assets generally consist of fixed-maturity securities, equity securities, short-term investments and cash equivalents. We seek to maximize
investment returns using investment guidelines that stress prudent allocation among cash and cash equivalents, fixed-maturity securities and, to a lesser extent,
equity securities.
Our fixed-maturity securities are classified as "available-for-sale" and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses on those securities reported, net
of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Our equity securities are carried at fair value and changes in the fair value
of these investments are recognized in net income. Fair value generally represents quoted market value prices for securities traded in the public market or
prices analytically determined using bid or closing prices for securities not actively traded in the public marketplace. Short-term investments, if any, are
reported at amortized cost and include investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have maturities of 12 months or less upon
acquisition by us.
In December of 2022, we acquired real estate adjacent to our current headquarters for $76.6 million. Real estate and the related depreciable assets are carried at
cost, net of accumulated depreciation. During 2023, we sold a portion of our real estate investment for approximately $62.0 million and determined we will
occupy a portion for future office space expansion. The remaining $15.0 million represents the portion of such assets we held at December 31, 2024 for
investment purposes.
10

Table of Contents
Our cash and invested assets totaled $4.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and $3.1 billion at December 31, 2023, and are summarized as follows:
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Carrying Value
% of Portfolio
Carrying Value
% of Portfolio
($ in thousands)
Fixed maturities - at fair value:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
15,048 
0.4 %
$
27,254 
0.9 %
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
146,304 
3.6 %
171,044 
5.5 %
Corporate and other securities
1,989,490 
48.9 %
1,387,693 
44.9 %
Asset-backed securities
732,742 
18.0 %
641,760 
20.7 %
Residential mortgage-backed securities
448,874 
11.0 %
417,106 
13.5 %
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
205,105 
5.0 %
66,902 
2.1 %
Total fixed maturities
3,537,563 
86.9 %
2,711,759 
87.6 %
Equity securities - at fair value:
Exchange traded funds
129,731 
3.2 %
106,300 
3.4 %
Non-redeemable preferred stock
26,433 
0.6 %
33,173 
1.1 %
Common stock
242,195 
6.0 %
95,340 
3.1 %
Total equity securities
398,359 
9.8 %
234,813 
7.6 %
Short-term investments, at amortized cost
3,714 
0.1 %
5,589 
0.2 %
Real estate investment, net
15,045 
0.4 %
14,791 
0.5 %
Cash and cash equivalents
113,213 
2.8 %
126,694 
4.1 %
Total
$
4,067,894 
100.0 %
$
3,093,646 
100.0 %
Our policy is to invest primarily in high-quality fixed-maturity securities with a primary focus on preservation of capital and a secondary focus on maximizing
our risk-adjusted investment returns. Investment policy is set by the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to the limits of applicable
regulations. Our investment policy is designed to comply with the regulatory investment requirements and restrictions to which our insurance subsidiary is
subject. Our fixed-maturity portfolio and preferred stocks are managed by an outside investment advisory firm and our equity securities are managed in-house
under guidelines approved by our Investment Committee. Our Investment Committee meets periodically and reports to our Board of Directors.
Our investment policy also imposes strict requirements for credit quality, with a minimum average credit quality of the portfolio being rated "AA-" or higher by
Standard & Poor's or the equivalent rating from another nationally recognized rating agency. Our investment policy also imposes restrictions on concentrations
of securities by class and issuer. As of December 31, 2024, our fixed-maturity portfolio, including cash equivalents, had an average duration of 3.0 years and
had an average rating of "AA-."
11

Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the composition of our portfolio of fixed-maturity securities by rating as of December 31, 2024:
AAA
AA
A
BBB
Below BBB
Total
($ in thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government agencies
$
— 
$
15,048 
$
— 
$
— 
$
— 
$
15,048 
Obligations of states, municipalities and political
subdivisions
20,625 
91,453 
28,545 
4,959 
722 
146,304 
Corporate and other securities
180 
155,136 
1,127,396 
644,325 
62,453 
1,989,490 
Asset-backed securities
714,287 
4,126 
10,982 
3,347 
— 
732,742 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
102,131 
346,484 
— 
— 
259 
448,874 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
196,802 
8,303 
— 
— 
— 
205,105 
Total fixed maturities
$
1,034,025 
$
620,550 
$
1,166,923 
$
652,631 
$
63,434 
$
3,537,563 
The fair value of our investments in fixed-maturity securities at December 31, 2024, summarized by stated maturities follows:
December 31, 2024
Estimated
% of
Fair Value
Fair Value
($ in thousands)
Due in one year or less
$
415,674 
11.8 %
Due after one year through five years
1,058,729 
29.9 %
Due after five years through ten years
496,044 
14.0 %
Due after ten years
180,395 
5.1 %
Asset-backed securities
732,742 
20.7 %
Residential mortgage-backed securities
448,874 
12.7 %
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
205,105 
5.8 %
Total fixed maturities
$
3,537,563 
100.0 %
Actual maturities may differ for some securities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties. As of December 31,
2024, our fixed-maturity security portfolio contained $448.9 million (12.7%) of residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"). RMBS, including
collateralized mortgage obligations, are subject to prepayment risks that vary with, among other things, interest rates. During periods of declining interest rates,
RMBS generally prepay faster as the underlying mortgages are prepaid and refinanced by the borrowers in order to take advantage of the lower rates. As a
result, during periods of falling interest rates, proceeds from such prepayments generally must be reinvested at lower prevailing yields. In addition, RMBS that
have an amortized cost that is greater than par (i.e., purchased at a premium) may incur a reduction in yield or a loss as a result of such prepayments.
Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the rate of prepayments generally slows. RMBS that have an amortized value that is less than par (i.e.,
purchased at a discount) may incur a decrease in yield as a result of a slower rate of prepayments. Changes in estimated cash flows due to changes in
prepayment assumptions from the original purchase assumptions are revised based on current interest rates and the economic environment. Our investment
policy does not permit us to own any interest only, principal only or residual tranches of RMBS.
12

Table of Contents
At December 31, 2024, our portfolio of fixed-maturity securities contained corporate bonds with a fair value of $2.0 billion. A summary of these securities by
industry segment is shown below as of December 31, 2024:
December 31, 2024
Industry
Fair Value
% of Total
($ in thousands)
Industrials and other
$
1,045,232 
52.5 %
Financial
777,136 
39.1 %
Utilities
167,122 
8.4 %
Total
$
1,989,490 
100.0 %
Approximately 9.2% of our total cash and investments were invested in certain common stocks and exchange traded funds ("ETFs"). At December 31, 2024,
our equity securities included the following:
December 31, 2024
Equity securities
Fair Value
% of Total
($ in thousands)
Common stocks
$
242,195 
65.1 %
Domestic stock market fund
129,731 
34.9 %
Total
$
371,926 
100.0 %
Approximately 0.6% of our total cash and investments were invested in nonredeemable preferred stock. A summary of these securities by industry segment is
shown below as of December 31, 2024:
December 31, 2024
Industry
Fair Value
% of Total
($ in thousands)
Financial
$
25,582 
96.8 %
Industrials and other
851 
3.2 %
Total
$
26,433 
100.0 %
Competition
The P&C insurance industry is highly competitive. We compete with domestic and international insurers, some of which have greater financial, marketing and
management resources and experience than we do. We may also compete with new market entrants in the future. Competition is based on many factors,
including the perceived market strength of the insurer, pricing and other terms and conditions, services provided, the speed of claims payment, the reputation
and experience of the insurer and ratings assigned by independent rating organizations such as A.M. Best. Our insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance,
currently has a rating from A.M. Best of "A" (Excellent). Ratings for an insurance company are based on its ability to pay policyholder obligations and are not
directed toward the protection of investors.
Today, our primary competitors in the E&S sector include American International Group, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited,
James River Group Holdings, Ltd., Lloyds of London, Markel Group Inc., RLI Corp. and W. R. Berkley Corporation.
Regulation
Insurance regulation
We are regulated by insurance regulatory authorities in the states in which we conduct business. State insurance laws and regulations generally are designed to
protect the interests of policyholders, consumers and claimants rather than stockholders or other investors. The nature and extent of state regulation varies by
jurisdiction, and state insurance regulators generally have broad administrative power relating to, among other matters, setting capital and surplus requirements,
licensing of insurers and agents, establishing standards for reserve adequacy, prescribing statutory
13

Table of Contents
accounting methods, determining the form and content of statutory financial reports, regulating certain transactions with affiliates and prescribing types and
amounts of investments insurers may hold.
Regulation of insurance companies constantly changes as governmental agencies and legislatures react to real or perceived issues. In recent years, the state
insurance regulatory framework has come under increased federal scrutiny, and some state legislatures have considered or enacted laws that alter and, in many
cases, increase, state authority to regulate insurance companies and insurance holding company systems. Further, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners ("NAIC") and state insurance regulators are continually re-examining existing laws and regulations, specifically focusing on issues relating to
the solvency of insurance companies, group capital requirements, interpretations of existing laws and the development of new laws. Although the federal
government does not directly regulate the business of insurance, federal initiatives often affect the insurance industry in a variety of ways. In addition, the
Federal Insurance Office (the "FIO") was established within the U.S. Department of the Treasury by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") in July 2010 to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry, including identifying issues or gaps in the regulation of
insurers that could contribute to a systemic crisis in the insurance industry or the U.S. financial system. See "—Federal and state legislative and regulatory
changes" below.
Required licensing
Kinsale Insurance is organized and domiciled in the State of Arkansas and maintains a Certificate of Authority (license) in the State of Arkansas to transact
certain lines of P&C insurance as a domestic surplus lines insurer. This license is in good standing, and, pursuant to applicable Arkansas laws and regulations,
will continue in force unless suspended, revoked or otherwise terminated, subject to certain conditions, including the payment by Kinsale Insurance of annual
continuation fees, the filing of annual statutory financial statements and the filing of an annual registration statement with the Arkansas Insurance Department.
Kinsale Insurance currently operates on an excess and surplus lines basis in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
U.S. Virgin Islands. While Kinsale Insurance does not have to apply for and maintain a license in those states (with the exception of Arkansas, its domiciliary
state), it is subject to maintaining suitability standards under each particular state’s surplus lines laws to be included as an eligible surplus lines carrier (as
discussed below, the Dodd-Frank Act has brought uniformity to these standards (see "—Federal and state legislative and regulatory changes")). In states in
which it operates on a surplus line basis, Kinsale Insurance has freedom of rate and form on the majority of its business. This means that Kinsale Insurance can
implement a change in policy form, underwriting guidelines, or rates for a product without regulatory approval.
Almost all insurance is written through licensed agents and brokers. In states in which we operate on a non-admitted basis, general agents and their retail
insurance brokers generally are required to certify that a certain number of licensed admitted insurers had been offered and declined to write a particular risk
prior to placing that risk with us.
In addition, Aspera, our insurance broker, and designated employees must be licensed to act as insurance producers or adjusters, as applicable, by insurance
regulatory authorities in the states where they operate. Such insurance regulatory authorities are vested in most cases with relatively broad discretion as to the
granting, revocation, suspension, and renewal of licenses.
Insurance holding company regulation
We operate as an insurance holding company system and are subject to the insurance holding company laws of the State of Arkansas, the state in which Kinsale
Insurance is organized and domiciled. These laws require that each insurance company in the system register with the insurance department of its state of
domicile and furnish information concerning the operations of companies within the holding company system that may materially affect the operations,
management or financial condition of the insurers within the system and domiciled in that state. These laws also provide that all transactions among members
of a holding company system must be fair and reasonable. Transactions between insurance subsidiaries and their parents and affiliates generally must be
disclosed to the state regulators, and notice to or prior approval of the applicable state insurance regulator generally is required for any material or
extraordinary transaction.
On December 9, 2020, the NAIC initially adopted the Group Capital Calculation ("GCC") template and instructions, as well as corresponding amendments to
NAIC model insurance holding company system laws. The amendments require,
14

Table of Contents
subject to certain exemptions, that the ultimate controlling person of each insurance group file a GCC on an annual basis with such insurance group’s lead state
commissioner. In May of 2022, the Group Capital Calculation (E) Working Group subsequently adopted the 2022 GCC Instructions and Template. The GCC
uses a risk-based capital aggregation approach intended to provide regulators with an additional group supervisory tool. As of October 31, 2024, thirty-five (35)
states have adopted the 2020 revisions to the Insurance Holding Company Act pertaining to Group Capital Calculation and Liquidity Stress Testing. Arkansas
has not yet adopted these revisions. We are currently evaluating the potential impacts.
Changes of control
Before a person can acquire control of a U.S. domestic insurer, prior written approval must be obtained from the insurance commissioner of the state where the
insurer is domiciled. Prior to granting approval of an application to acquire control of a domestic insurer, the domiciliary state insurance commissioner will
consider a number of factors, which include the financial strength of the proposed acquiror, the acquiror’s plans for the future operations of the domestic
insurer and any anti-competitive results that may arise from the consummation of the acquisition of control.
Generally, state insurance statutes provide that control over a domestic insurer is presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds
with the power to vote, or holds proxies representing, ten percent or more of the voting securities of the domestic insurer. This statutory presumption of control
may be rebutted by a showing that control does not exist in fact. The state regulators, however, may find that "control" exists in circumstances in which a
person owns or controls less than ten percent of the voting securities of the domestic insurer.
As Kinsale Insurance is domiciled in Arkansas, the insurance laws and regulations of that state would be applicable to any proposed acquisition of control of
Kinsale Insurance. Under applicable Arkansas insurance laws and regulations, no person may acquire control of a domestic insurer until written approval is
obtained from the state insurance commissioner following a public hearing on the proposed acquisition. Such approval would be contingent upon the state
insurance commissioner’s consideration of a number of factors, including among others, the financial strength of the proposed acquiror, the integrity and
management of the acquiror’s board of directors and executive officers, the acquiror’s plans for the future operations of the domestic insurer and any anti-
competitive results that may arise from the consummation of the acquisition of control. Arkansas insurance laws and regulations contain a rebuttable
presumption of control if any person directly or indirectly acquires ten percent or more of the voting stock of an Arkansas-domiciled insurer. Accordingly, the
acquisition of ten percent or more of our common stock would be considered an indirect change of control of Kinsale Insurance and would trigger the
applicable change of control filing requirements under Arkansas insurance laws and regulations, absent a disclaimer of control filing and its acceptance by the
Arkansas Insurance Department. These requirements may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of us,
including through transactions that some or all of our stockholders might consider to be desirable.
Restrictions on paying dividends
State insurance laws restrict the ability of insurance companies to declare and pay stockholder dividends. State insurance regulators require insurance
companies to maintain specified levels of statutory capital and surplus. The maximum dividend distribution absent the approval or non-disapproval of the
insurance regulatory authority in Arkansas is limited by Arkansas law to the greater of 10% of policyholder surplus as of December 31 of the previous year or
net income, not including realized capital gains, for the previous calendar year. Dividend payments are further limited to that part of available policyholder
surplus which is derived from net profits on an insurer’s business.
Investment regulation
Kinsale Insurance is subject to state laws which require diversification of our investment portfolios and limits on the amount of our investments in certain
categories. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations would cause non-conforming investments to be treated as non-admitted assets in the states in
which we are licensed to sell insurance policies for purposes of measuring statutory surplus and, in some instances, would require us to dispose of those
investments.
Restrictions on cancellation, non-renewal or withdrawal
Many states have laws and regulations that limit the ability of an insurance company licensed by that state to exit a market. Some states prohibit an insurer
from withdrawing from one or more lines of business in the state except pursuant
15

Table of Contents
to a plan approved by the state insurance regulator, which may disapprove a plan that may lead to market disruption. Some state statutes may explicitly or by
interpretation apply these restrictions to insurers operating on a surplus lines basis.
Enterprise risk and other developments
The NAIC, as part of its solvency modernization initiative, has engaged in a concerted effort to strengthen the ability of U.S. state insurance regulators to
monitor U.S. insurance holding company groups. Recent efforts by the NAIC to establish group capital standards are consistent with this initiative. State
insurance holding company laws, including those in Arkansas, address "enterprise" risk, the risk that an activity, circumstance, event or series of events
involving one or more affiliates of an insurer will, if not remedied promptly, be likely to have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition or
liquidity of the insurer or its insurance holding company system as a whole and require annual reporting of potential enterprise risk as well as access to
information to allow the state insurance regulator to assess such risk. Under Arkansas insurance holding company laws, the ultimate controlling person of
insurers subject to registration is required to file an annual enterprise risk report with the lead state commissioner, when applicable, of the insurance holding
company system as determined by the procedures within the Financial Analysis Handbook adopted by the NAIC.
In 2012, the NAIC adopted the Risk Management and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment ("ORSA") Model Act. The ORSA Model Act, when adopted by
state regulators requires domestic insurers to maintain a risk management framework and establishes a legal requirement for domestic insurers to conduct an
ORSA. The ORSA Summary Report is a confidential internal assessment, appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of an insurer, regarding the material
and relevant risks identified by the insurer associated with an insurer’s current business plan and the sufficiency of capital resources to support those risks.
Effective July 2015, Arkansas adopted its version of the ORSA Model Act. Our subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance, is subject to the requirements of the ORSA
Model Act as adopted in its domicile of Arkansas.
Additionally, in response to the growing threat of cyber-attacks in the insurance industry, certain jurisdictions have begun to consider new cybersecurity
measures, including the adoption of cybersecurity regulations which, among other things, would require insurance companies to establish and maintain a
cybersecurity program and implement and maintain cybersecurity policies and procedures. On October 24, 2017, the NAIC adopted its Insurance Data
Security Model Law, intended to serve as model legislation for states to enact in order to govern cybersecurity and data protection practices of insurers,
insurance agents, and other licensed entities registered under state insurance laws (Arkansas has not yet adopted this model legislation). The New York State
Department of Financial Services ("DFS") issued regulations governing cybersecurity requirements for financial services companies, which became effective
on March 1, 2017, and, as currently amended, require insurance companies, among others, regulated in New York to assess their specific cyber risk profiles
and design cyber security programs to address such risks. We annually file our program compliance certifications pertaining to the DFS cybersecurity
requirements in New York.
Federal and state legislative and regulatory changes
The U.S. federal government’s oversight of the insurance industry was expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act. Prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in
July 2010, the U.S. federal government’s regulation of the insurance industry was essentially limited to certain insurance products, such as flood insurance,
multi-peril crop insurance and reinsurance of losses from terrorism. As part of the overall federal financial regulatory reform package contained in the Dodd-
Frank Act, Congress has legislated reforms in the surplus lines sector (among others).
The Dodd-Frank Act incorporates the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010 ("NRRA"), which became effective on July 21, 2011. Among other
things, the NRRA establishes national uniform standards on how states may regulate and tax surplus lines insurance and sets national standards concerning the
regulation of reinsurance. In particular, the NRRA gives regulators in the home state of an insured exclusive authority to regulate and tax surplus lines
insurance transactions, and regulators in a ceding insurer’s state of domicile the sole responsibility for regulating the balance sheet credit that the ceding
insurer may take for reinsurance recoverables.
16

Table of Contents
The Dodd-Frank Act also established the FIO in the U.S. Department of the Treasury and vested the FIO with the authority to monitor all aspects of the
insurance sector, monitor the extent to which traditionally underserved communities and consumers have access to affordable non-health insurance products,
and to represent the United States on prudential aspects of international insurance matters, including at the International Association of Insurance Supervisors
(the "IAIS"). In addition, the FIO serves as an advisory member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, assists the secretary of the U.S. Department of the
Treasury with administration of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program, and advises the secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury on important national
and international insurance matters. In addition, the FIO has the ability to recommend to the Financial Stability Oversight Council the designation of an insurer
as "systemically important" and therefore subject to regulation and oversight by the Federal Reserve Board in a manner similar to a bank holding company also
subject to designation.
In limited circumstances, the FIO can declare a state insurance law or regulation "preempted," but this can be done only after extensive consultation with state
insurance regulators, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and key insurance industry players (in trade associations representing insurers and
intermediaries). Additionally, the FIO must publish a notice regarding the basis for the preemption in the Federal Register, allowing a reasonable opportunity
for comments. The FIO cannot preempt state antitrust laws governing rate making, underwriting, sales practices or coverage requirements. No later than
September 30th of each year, the FIO must submit an annual report to Congress explaining any use of the preemption authority during the prior year.
In addition, a number of federal laws affect and apply to the insurance industry, including various privacy laws and the economic and trade sanctions
implemented by the Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. OFAC maintains and enforces economic sanctions
against certain foreign countries and groups and prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions with certain persons or entities. OFAC has
imposed civil penalties on persons, including insurance and reinsurance companies, arising from violations of its economic sanctions program.
On November 20, 2015, the FIO and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced their intention to exercise their authority under the Dodd-Frank
Act to negotiate a “covered agreement” with the European Union (the "Covered Agreement"). After a number of private negotiating sessions, on January 13,
2017, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative notified Congress that they had completed negotiations with the
European Union for the Covered Agreement, which addressed reinsurance, insurance group supervision and the exchange of information between insurance
supervisors. The Covered Agreement was formally entered into on September 22, 2017. A covered agreement between the United States and the United
Kingdom extending terms nearly identical to the EU Covered Agreement to insurers and reinsurers operating in the UK following Brexit was entered into on
December 11, 2018.
With respect to reinsurance, under the Covered Agreement, both the U.S. and the European Union agreed that their supervisory authorities will not impose
reinsurance collateral requirements or "local presence" requirements on a reinsurer domiciled in (or with a head office in) the other’s territory that are less
favorable than collateral or local presence requirements applied to a domestic reinsurer. However, the collateral or local presence provisions apply only if the
insurer or reinsurer satisfies certain conditions and standards, including among others, minimum capital and risk-based capital, confirmation of financial
condition by the reinsurer’s domestic regulator and claims payment standards. U.S. states have five years from execution of the Covered Agreement to adopt
reinsurance reforms removing collateral requirements for European Union reinsurers that meet the prescribed conditions in the Covered Agreement. If the FIO
determines that state laws are inconsistent with the Covered Agreement (the process of making potential preemption determinations will begin 42 months
following execution of the Covered Agreement), such states laws may be preempted.
On June 25, 2019, the NAIC adopted revisions to the Credit for Reinsurance Model Law and Regulation in order to satisfy the substantive and timing
requirements of the Covered Agreement. These amendments pave the way for state legislatures to bring their credit for reinsurance laws into compliance with
the Covered Agreement's zero reinsurance collateral provisions by September 2022, thereby avoiding a potential federal preemption of these laws. Associated
revisions were adopted by Arkansas effective July 1, 2021.
17

Table of Contents
Trade practices
The manner in which insurance companies and insurance agents and brokers conduct the business of insurance is regulated by state statutes in an effort to
prohibit practices that constitute unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices. Prohibited practices include, but are not limited to,
disseminating false information or advertising, unfair discrimination, rebating and false statements. We set business conduct policies and provide training to
make our employee-agents and other sales personnel aware of these prohibitions, and we require them to conduct their activities in compliance with these
statutes.
Unfair claims practices
Generally, insurance companies, adjusting companies and individual claims adjusters are prohibited by state statutes from engaging in unfair claims practices.
Unfair claims practices include, but are not limited to, misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions; failing to acknowledge and act reasonably
promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies; and attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a
reasonable person would have believed such person was entitled. We set business conduct policies and conduct training to make our employee-adjusters and
other claims personnel aware of these prohibitions, and we require them to conduct their activities in compliance with these statutes.
Credit for reinsurance
State insurance laws permit U.S. insurance companies, as ceding insurers, to take financial statement credit for reinsurance that is ceded, so long as the
assuming reinsurer satisfies the state’s credit for reinsurance laws. The NRRA contained in the Dodd-Frank Act provides that if the state of domicile of a ceding
insurer is an NAIC accredited state, or has financial solvency requirements substantially similar to the requirements necessary for NAIC accreditation, and
recognizes credit for reinsurance for the insurer’s ceded risk, then no other state may deny such credit for reinsurance. Because all states are currently
accredited by the NAIC, the Dodd-Frank Act prohibits a state in which a U.S. ceding insurer is licensed but not domiciled from denying credit for reinsurance
for the insurer’s ceded risk if the cedant's domestic state regulator recognizes credit for reinsurance. The ceding company in this instance is permitted to reflect
in its statutory financial statements a credit in an aggregate amount equal to the ceding company’s liability for unearned premium (which are that portion of
written premiums which applies to the unexpired portion of the policy period), loss reserves and loss expense reserves to the extent ceded to the reinsurer.
Periodic financial and market conduct examinations
The insurance regulatory authority in the State of Arkansas, our insurance subsidiary's state of domicile, conducts on-site visits and examinations of the affairs
of our insurance subsidiary, including its financial condition, its relationships and transactions with affiliates and its dealings with policyholders, every three to
five years, and may conduct special or targeted examinations to address particular concerns or issues at any time. Insurance regulators of other states in which
we do business also may conduct examinations. The results of these examinations can give rise to regulatory orders requiring remedial, injunctive or other
corrective action. Insurance regulatory authorities have broad administrative powers to regulate trade practices and, in that connection, to restrict or rescind
licenses to transact business and to levy fines and monetary penalties against insurers and insurance agents and brokers found to be in violation of applicable
laws and regulations.
Risk-based capital
Risk-based capital ("RBC") laws are designed to assess the minimum amount of capital that an insurance company needs to support its overall business
operations and to ensure that it has an acceptably low expectation of becoming financially impaired. State insurance regulators use RBC to set capital
requirements, considering the size and degree of risk taken by the insurer and taking into account various risk factors including asset risk, credit risk,
underwriting risk and interest rate risk. As the ratio of an insurer’s total adjusted capital and surplus decreases relative to its risk-based capital, the RBC laws
provide for increasing levels of regulatory intervention culminating with mandatory control of the operations of the insurer by the domiciliary insurance
department at the so-called mandatory control level.
18

Table of Contents
The Arkansas Insurance Department has largely adopted the model legislation promulgated by the NAIC pertaining to RBC, and requires annual reporting by
Arkansas-domiciled insurers to confirm that the minimum amount of RBC necessary for an insurer to support its overall business operations has been met.
Arkansas-domiciled insurers falling below a calculated threshold may be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action, including supervision, rehabilitation
or liquidation by the Arkansas Insurance Department. Failure to maintain our risk-based capital at the required levels could adversely affect the ability of
Kinsale Insurance to maintain the regulatory authority necessary to conduct our business. However, as of December 31, 2024, Kinsale Insurance maintained
RBC levels significantly in excess of amounts that would require any corrective actions.
IRIS ratios
The NAIC Insurance Regulatory Information System, or IRIS, is part of a collection of analytical tools designed to provide state insurance regulators with an
integrated approach to screening and analyzing the financial condition of insurance companies operating in their respective states. IRIS is intended to assist
state insurance regulators in targeting resources to those insurers in greatest need of regulatory attention. IRIS consists of two phases: statistical and analytical.
In the statistical phase, the NAIC database generates key financial ratio results based on financial information obtained from insurers’ annual statutory
statements. The analytical phase is a review of the annual statements, financial ratios and other automated solvency tools. The primary goal of the analytical
phase is to identify companies that appear to require immediate regulatory attention. A ratio result falling outside the usual range of IRIS ratios is not
considered a failing result; rather, unusual values are viewed as part of the regulatory early monitoring system. Furthermore, in some years, it may not be
unusual for financially sound companies to have several ratios with results outside the usual ranges. An insurance company may fall out of the usual range for
one or more ratios because of specific transactions that are in themselves immaterial.
Ratings
A.M. Best, which rates insurance companies based on factors of concern to policyholders, rates our insurance subsidiary. A.M. Best assigns ratings to insurance
companies, which range from "A++" (Superior) to "F" (In Liquidation). Our insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance, has a rating of "A" (Excellent), which is
the third highest rating. In evaluating a company's financial and operating performance, A.M. Best reviews the company's profitability, leverage and liquidity,
as well as its book of business, the adequacy and soundness of its reinsurance, the quality and estimated market value of its assets, the adequacy of its loss and
loss expense reserves, the adequacy of its surplus, its capital structure, the experience and competence of its management and its market presence. A.M. Best's
ratings reflect its opinion of an insurance company's financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. These
evaluations are not directed to purchasers of an insurance company's securities.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2024, we had 674 employees, of which 660 were full-time employees, and all of whom were located at our headquarters in Richmond,
Virginia.
Compensation and Benefits
We believe that our employees are our most valuable asset and paying our employees well is the foundation of our performance-based culture. In order to
attract and retain high-performing talent, we offer and maintain market-competitive compensation and benefit programs to all our employees. Our
compensation program includes base salary, performance-based bonuses and equity grants for all management-level and select other employees. The mix of
these rewards varies depending on the employee’s role at the Company and our longstanding pay-for-performance philosophy. While all of our employees are
eligible to participate in the variable compensation elements of our program (annual cash bonus and equity awards), variable compensation becomes a larger
portion of the total mix for employees at higher levels in the organization. Our executives, who are responsible for the development and execution of our
strategic and financial plans, have the largest portion of their compensation tied to equity-based incentives to ensure financial alignment with our stockholders.
19

Table of Contents
In addition to competitive compensation, we offer comprehensive and flexible benefit options to support the health and wellness needs of our employees
including:
• Company-matched 401(k) plan
• Educational assistance program
• Medical insurance
• Company-paid insurance benefits
• Health savings accounts with large employer contributions and flexible spending accounts
• Paid time off, family leave, and employee assistance programs.
Learning and Development
Employee training and development programs that enhance employee skills and capabilities directly lead to Kinsale’s success. We encourage and support
employee development through our Educational Assistance Program. All employees have the opportunity to enroll in courses or classes that will enhance their
contribution to the organization and/or prepare them for more advanced positions at Kinsale. Our employees have access to courses tailored to specific career
paths, such as underwriting, claims, information technology, reinsurance, and other disciplines to build professional expertise. We offer an array of classes that
were developed within Kinsale to all employees. These classes support employees’ growth from the new employee/onboarding stage through senior manager
development. We also sponsor on-site education courses, such as the Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter (CPCU), that make professional development
programs more accessible to our employees.
Performance and Success
We believe that performance management ensures our continued success through cultivating the right talent and skill sets and equipping our employees with
the necessary tools and feedback. On an annual basis, every employee at Kinsale actively participates in a performance evaluation. The annual performance
management process requires setting goals, planning development, assessing progress against those goals as well as discussing opportunities for improvement.
Our performance management process provides a forum for meaningful conversations to discuss what went well and what can be improved.
Diversity and Inclusion
We believe in hiring the best talent and making our employment-related decisions without regard to race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national
origin, age, veteran status, disability, or other characteristics or activity that is protected by state or U.S. federal law. We have an anti-nepotism policy to ensure
fairness and business decisions are based on individual qualifications, skills, ability, and performance. We value the diverse perspectives, talent, and experience
that our employees bring to our organization. We believe the best business decisions are reached by listening to diverse views and opinions.
We are committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment free from discrimination of any kind.
Available Information
We file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains
an internet web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including us, that file electronically with
the SEC. The address of that site is https://www.sec.gov. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K
and other information filed by us with the SEC are available, without charge, on our internet web site, https://www.kinsalecapitalgroup.com, as soon as
reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. The information on our website is not a part of this Annual Report.
20

Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. There may be additional risks and uncertainties of which we currently are unaware or
currently believe to be immaterial. The occurrence of any of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results
of operations and prospects.
Risks Related to Our Business, Industry, and Operations
Our loss reserves may be inadequate to cover our actual losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Our success depends on our ability to accurately assess the risks related to the businesses and people that we insure. We establish loss and loss adjustment
expense reserves for the ultimate payment of all claims and the related costs of adjusting those claims, as of the date of our financial statements. Reserves do
not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, reserves represent an estimate of ultimate settlement cost and our ultimate liability may be greater or less
than our estimate.
As part of the reserving process, we review historical data and consider the impact of such factors as:
•
claims inflation, which is the sustained increase in cost of raw materials, labor, medical services and other components of claims cost;
•
claims development patterns by line of business and by "claims made" versus "occurrence" policies;
•
legislative activity;
•
social and economic patterns; and
•
litigation, judicial and regulatory trends (e.g., increased litigation, higher jury awards and third-party litigation funding, among others).
These variables are affected by both internal and external events that could increase our exposure to losses, and we continually monitor our reserves using new
information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. This process assumes that past experience, adjusted for the effects of current
developments and anticipated trends, is an appropriate basis for predicting future events. There is, however, no precise method for evaluating the impact of any
specific factor on the adequacy of reserves, and actual results may deviate, perhaps substantially, from our reserve estimates. For instance, the following
uncertainties may have an impact on the adequacy of our reserves:
•
When we write "occurrence" policies, we are obligated to pay covered claims, up to the contractually agreed amount, for any covered loss that occurs
while the policy is in force. Accordingly, claims may arise many years after a policy has lapsed. Approximately 83.6% of our net casualty loss reserves
were associated with "occurrence" policies as of December 31, 2024.
•
Even when a claim is received (irrespective of whether the policy is a "claims made" or "occurrence" basis form), it may take considerable time to fully
recognize the extent of the covered loss suffered by the insured and, consequently, estimates of loss associated with specific claims can increase over time.
•
New theories of liability are enforced retroactively from time to time by courts. See also "—The failure of any of the loss limitations or exclusions we
employ, or changes in other claims or coverage issues, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations."
•
Volatility in the financial markets, economic events and other external factors may result in an increase in the number of claims and/or severity of the
claims reported. In addition, elevated inflationary conditions would, among other things, cause loss costs to increase. See also "—Adverse economic
factors, including recession, inflation, periods of high unemployment or lower economic activity could result in the sale of fewer policies than expected or
an increase
21

Table of Contents
in frequency or severity of claims and premium defaults or both, which, in turn, could affect our growth and profitability."
•
If claims were to become more frequent, even if we had no liability for those claims, the cost of evaluating such potential claims could escalate beyond the
amount of the reserves we have established. As we enter new lines of business, or as a result of new theories of claims, we may encounter an increase in
claims frequency and greater claims handling costs than we had anticipated.
In addition, there may be significant reporting lags between the occurrence of the insured event and the time it is actually reported to us and additional lags
between the time of reporting and final settlement of any claims. Consequently, estimates of loss associated with specified claims can increase as new
information emerges, which could cause the reserves for the claim to become inadequate.
If any of our reserves should prove to be inadequate, we will be required to increase our reserves resulting in a reduction in our net income and stockholders’
equity in the period in which the deficiency is identified. Future loss experience substantially in excess of established reserves could also have a material
adverse effect on our future earnings, liquidity and our financial rating.
For further discussion of our reserve experience, please see "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —
Critical Accounting Estimates — Reserves for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses."
Given the inherent uncertainty of models, the usefulness of such models as a tool to evaluate risk is subject to a high degree of uncertainty that could result
in actual losses that are materially different than our estimates, including PMLs. A deviation from our loss estimates may adversely impact, perhaps
significantly, our financial results.
Our approach to risk management relies on subjective variables that entail significant uncertainties. For example, we rely heavily on estimates of PMLs for
certain events that are generated by computer-run models. In addition, we rely on historical data and scenarios in managing credit and interest rate risks in our
investment portfolio. These estimates, models, data and scenarios may not produce accurate predictions and consequently, we could incur losses both in the
risks we underwrite and to the value of our investment portfolio.
We use third-party vendor models to provide us with objective risk assessment relating to other risks in our reinsurance portfolio. We use these models to help
us control risk accumulation, inform management and other stakeholders of capital requirements and to improve the risk/return profile or minimize the amount
of capital required to cover the risks in each of our reinsurance contracts. However, given the inherent uncertainty of modeling techniques and the application
of such techniques, these models and databases may not accurately address a variety of matters which might impact certain of our coverages.
Small changes in assumptions, which depend heavily on our judgment and foresight, can have a significant impact on the modeled outputs. For example,
catastrophe models that simulate loss estimates based on a set of assumptions are important tools used to estimate our PMLs. These assumptions address a
number of factors that impact loss potential including, but not limited to, the characteristics of a given natural catastrophe event; the increase in claim costs
resulting from limited supply of labor and materials needed for repairs following a catastrophe event (demand surge); the types, function, location and
characteristics of exposed risks; susceptibility of exposed risks to damage from an event with specific characteristics; and the financial and contractual
provisions of the (re)insurance contracts that cover losses arising from an event. We run many model simulations in order to understand the impact of these
assumptions on a catastrophe’s loss potential. Furthermore, there are risks associated with catastrophe events, which are either poorly represented or not
represented at all by catastrophe models. Each modeling assumption or un-modeled risk introduces uncertainty into PML estimates that management must
consider. These uncertainties can include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
The models do not address all the possible hazard characteristics of a catastrophe peril (e.g. the precise path and wind speed of a hurricane);
•
The models may not accurately reflect the true frequency of events;
•
The models may not accurately reflect a risk's vulnerability or susceptibility to damage for a given event
22

Table of Contents
characteristic;
•
The models may not accurately represent loss potential to insurance or reinsurance contract coverage limits, terms and conditions; and
•
The models may not accurately reflect the impact on the economy of the area affected or the financial, judicial, political, or regulatory impact on insurance
claim payments during or following a catastrophe event.
Our PMLs are reviewed by management after the assessment of outputs from multiple third-party vendor models and other qualitative and quantitative
assessments, including exposures not typically modeled in vendor models. Our methodology for estimating PMLs may differ from methods used by other
companies and external parties given the various assumptions and judgments required to estimate a PML.
As a result of these factors and contingencies, our reliance on assumptions and data used to evaluate our entire reinsurance portfolio and specifically to estimate
a PML is subject to a high degree of uncertainty that could result in actual losses that are materially different from our PML estimates and our financial results
could be adversely affected.
The failure of any of the loss limitations or exclusions we employ, or changes in other claims or coverage issues, could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition or results of operations.
Although we seek to mitigate our loss exposure through a variety of methods, the future is inherently unpredictable. It is difficult to predict the timing,
frequency and severity of losses with statistical certainty. It is not possible to completely eliminate our exposure to unforecasted or unpredictable events and, to
the extent that losses from such risks occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
For instance, various provisions of our policies, such as limitations or exclusions from coverage or choice of forum, which have been negotiated to limit our
risks, may not be enforceable in the manner we intend. At the present time, we employ a variety of endorsements to our policies that limit exposure to known
risks. As industry practices and legal, judicial, social and other conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may
emerge.
In addition, we design our policy terms to manage our exposure to expanding theories of legal liability like those which have given rise to claims for lead paint,
asbestos, mold, construction defects and environmental matters. Many of the policies we issue also include conditions requiring the prompt reporting of claims
to us and entitle us to decline coverage in the event of a violation of those conditions. Also, many of our policies limit the period during which a policyholder
may bring a claim under the policy, which in many cases is shorter than the statutory period under which such claims can be brought against our policyholders.
While these exclusions and limitations help us assess and reduce our loss exposure and help eliminate known exposures to certain risks, it is possible that a
court or regulatory authority could nullify or void an exclusion or legislation could be enacted modifying or barring the use of such endorsements and
limitations. These types of governmental actions could result in higher than anticipated losses and loss adjustment expenses, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
As industry practices and legal, judicial, social and other environmental conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage
may emerge. Examples of unanticipated risks that have adversely affected the insurance industry are:
•
Asbestos liability applied to manufacturers of products and contractors who installed those products.
•
Apportionment of liability arising from subsidence claims assigned to subcontractors who may have been involved in mundane tasks (such as installing
sheetrock in a home).
•
Court decisions, such as the 1995 Montrose decision in California, that read policy exclusions narrowly so as to expand coverage, thereby requiring
insurers to create and write new exclusions.
•
An increase in class action lawsuits and cases assigned to Multi-District Litigation (MDL), which often lengthens claim duration and increases legal
expenses.
These issues may adversely affect our business by either broadening coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. In
some instances, these changes may not become apparent until sometime after
23

Table of Contents
we have issued insurance contracts that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance contracts may not be known for
many years after a contract is issued.
We may be unable to obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable prices or on terms that adequately protect us.
We use reinsurance to help manage our exposure to insurance risks. Reinsurance is a practice whereby one insurer, called the reinsurer, agrees to indemnify
another insurer, called the ceding insurer, for all or part of the potential liability arising from one or more insurance policies issued by the ceding insurer. The
availability and cost of reinsurance are subject to prevailing market conditions, both in terms of price and available capacity, which can affect our business
volume and profitability. In addition, reinsurance programs are generally subject to renewal on an annual basis. We may not be able to obtain reinsurance on
acceptable terms or from entities with satisfactory creditworthiness. If we are unable to obtain new reinsurance facilities or to renew expiring facilities, our net
exposures would increase. In such event, if we are unwilling to bear an increase in our net exposure, we would have to reduce the level of our underwriting
commitments, which would reduce our revenues.
Many reinsurance companies have begun to exclude certain coverages from, or alter terms in, the reinsurance contracts we enter into with them. Some
exclusions relate to risks that we cannot exclude due to business or regulatory constraints. In addition, reinsurers often impose terms, such as lower per-
occurrence and aggregate limits, on direct insurers that do not wholly cover the risks written by these direct insurers. As a result, we, like other direct insurance
companies, write insurance policies which to some extent do not have the benefit of reinsurance protection. These gaps in reinsurance protection expose us to
greater risk and greater potential losses. For example, certain reinsurers have excluded coverage for terrorist acts or priced such coverage at rates higher than
the underlying risk. Many direct insurers, including us, have written policies without terrorist act exclusions and in many cases we cannot exclude terrorist acts
because of regulatory constraints. We may, therefore, be exposed to potential losses as a result of terrorist acts. See also "Business — Reinsurance."
Severe weather conditions, catastrophes, pandemics and similar events may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is exposed to the risk of severe weather conditions and other catastrophes. Catastrophes can be caused by various events, including natural events
such as severe winter weather, tornadoes, windstorms, earthquakes, hailstorms, severe thunderstorms and fires, and other events such as explosions, war,
terrorist attacks and riots. The incidence and severity of catastrophes and severe weather conditions are inherently unpredictable. The extent of losses from
catastrophes is a function of the total amount of insured value, the number of insureds affected, the frequency and severity of the events, the effectiveness of
our catastrophe risk management program and the adequacy of our reinsurance coverage. Insurance companies are not permitted to reserve for a catastrophe
until it has occurred. Severe weather conditions and catastrophes can cause losses in our property lines and generally result in both an increase in the number of
claims incurred and an increase in the dollar amount of each claim asserted, which may require us to increase our reserves, causing our liquidity and financial
condition to deteriorate. In addition, our inability to obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable rates and in amounts adequate to mitigate the risks associated
with severe weather conditions and other catastrophes could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our business is also exposed to the risk of pandemics, outbreaks, public health crises, and geopolitical and social events, and their related effects. While policy
terms and conditions in the lines of business we write preclude coverage for virus-related claims, court decisions and governmental actions may challenge the
validity of any exclusions or our interpretation of how such terms and conditions operate.
Global climate change may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Climate change could have a significant impact on longer-term natural weather trends, including increases in severe weather and catastrophic events. While
most catastrophes are restricted to fairly specific geographic areas, the extent of loss and damage for insurance purposes is a function of both the total amount
of insured value in the area affected by the event and the severity of the event. We attempt to manage this exposure through careful and disciplined
underwriting, using sophisticated computer models to help assess our exposure to catastrophic events, purchasing extensive reinsurance protection from
financially strong counterparties and limiting the concentration of property business by geographic area.
24

Table of Contents
However, assessing the risk of loss and damage and the range of approaches to address the adverse effects of climate change, including impacts related to
extreme weather events and slow onset events, remains a challenge and may materially adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Risks Related to Market Conditions and our Business Operations
Adverse economic factors, including recession, inflation, periods of high unemployment or lower economic activity could result in the sale of fewer policies
than expected or an increase in frequency or severity of claims and premium defaults or both, which, in turn, could affect our growth and profitability.
Factors, such as business revenue, economic conditions, the volatility and strength of the capital markets and inflation can affect the business and economic
environment. These same factors affect our ability to generate revenue and profits. In an economic downturn that is characterized by higher unemployment,
declining spending and reduced corporate revenues, the demand for insurance products is generally adversely affected, which directly affects our premium
levels and profitability. Negative economic factors may also affect our ability to receive the appropriate rate for the risk we insure with our policyholders and
may adversely affect the number of policies we can write, including with respect to our opportunities to underwrite profitable business. In an economic
downturn, our customers may have less need for insurance coverage, cancel existing insurance policies, modify their coverage or not renew the policies they
hold with us. Existing policyholders may exaggerate or even falsify claims to obtain higher claims payments. These outcomes would reduce our underwriting
profit to the extent these factors are not reflected in the rates we charge.
We underwrite a significant portion of our insurance in California, Florida and Texas. Any economic downturn in any such state could have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A decline in our financial strength rating may adversely affect the amount of business we write.
Participants in the insurance industry use ratings from independent ratings agencies, such as A.M. Best, as an important means of assessing the financial
strength and quality of insurers. In setting its ratings, A.M. Best uses a quantitative and qualitative analysis of a company’s balance sheet strength, operating
performance and business profile. This analysis includes comparisons to peers and industry standards as well as assessments of operating plans, philosophy and
management. A.M. Best financial strength ratings range from "A++" (Superior) to "F" for insurance companies that have been publicly placed in liquidation.
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, A.M. Best has assigned a financial strength rating of "A" (Excellent) to our operating subsidiary, Kinsale
Insurance. A.M. Best assigns ratings that are intended to provide an independent opinion of an insurance company’s ability to meet its obligations to
policyholders and such ratings are not evaluations directed to investors and are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our common stock or any other
securities we may issue. A.M. Best periodically reviews our financial strength rating and may revise it downward or revoke it at its sole discretion based
primarily on its analysis of our balance sheet strength (including capital adequacy and loss adjustment expense reserve adequacy), operating performance and
business profile. Factors that could affect such analysis include but are not limited to:
•
if we change our business practices from our organizational business plan in a manner that no longer supports A.M. Best’s rating;
•
if unfavorable financial, regulatory or market trends affect us, including excess market capacity;
•
if our losses exceed our loss reserves;
•
if we have unresolved issues with government regulators;
•
if we are unable to retain our senior management or other key personnel;
•
if our investment portfolio incurs significant losses; or
•
if A.M. Best alters its capital adequacy assessment methodology in a manner that would adversely affect our rating.
These and other factors could result in a downgrade of our financial strength rating. A downgrade or withdrawal of our rating could result in any of the
following consequences, among others:
25

Table of Contents
•
causing our current and future brokers and insureds to choose other, more highly-rated competitors;
•
increasing the cost or reducing the availability of reinsurance to us; or
•
severely limiting or preventing us from writing new and renewal insurance contracts.
In addition, in view of the earnings and capital pressures recently experienced by many financial institutions, including insurance companies, it is possible that
rating organizations will heighten the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, will increase the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, will
request additional information from the companies that they rate or will increase the capital and other requirements employed in the rating organizations’
models for maintenance of certain ratings levels. We can offer no assurance that our rating will remain at its current level. It is possible that such reviews of us
may result in adverse ratings consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We could be adversely affected by the loss of one or more key executives or by an inability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
We depend on our ability to attract and retain experienced personnel and seasoned key executives who are knowledgeable about our business. The pool of
talent from which we actively recruit is limited and may fluctuate based on market dynamics specific to our industry and independent of overall economic
conditions. As such, higher demand for employees having the desired skills and expertise could lead to increased compensation expectations for existing and
prospective personnel, making it difficult for us to retain and recruit key personnel and maintain labor costs at desired levels. Only our Chief Executive Officer
has an employment agreement with us and is subject to a non-compete agreement. Should any of our key executives terminate their employment with us, or if
we are unable to retain and attract talented personnel, we may be unable to maintain our current competitive position in the specialized markets in which we
operate, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We rely on a select group of brokers, and such relationships may not continue.
We distribute the majority of our products through a select group of brokers. Of our 2024 gross written premiums, 62.3%, or $1.2 billion, were distributed
through five of our approximately 197 brokers, three of which accounted for 48.4%, or $905.8 million, of our 2024 gross written premiums.
Our relationship with any of these brokers may be discontinued at any time. Even if the relationships do continue, they may not be on terms that are profitable
for us. The termination of a relationship with one or more significant brokers could result in lower gross written premiums and could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations or business prospects.
Our E&S insurance operations are subject to increased risk from changing market conditions and our business is cyclical in nature, which may affect our
financial performance.
E&S insurance covers risks that are typically more complex and unusual than standard risks and require a high degree of specialized underwriting. As a result,
E&S risks do not often fit the underwriting criteria of standard insurance carriers, and are generally considered higher risk than those covered in the standard
market. If our underwriting staff inadequately judges and prices the risks associated with the business underwritten in the E&S market, our financial results
could be adversely impacted.
Historically, the financial performance of the P&C insurance industry has tended to fluctuate in cyclical periods of price competition and excess capacity
(known as a soft market) followed by periods of high premium rates and shortages of underwriting capacity (known as a hard market). Soft markets occur
when the supply of insurance capital in a given market or territory is greater than the amount of insurance coverage demanded by all potential insureds in that
market. When this occurs, insurance prices tend to decline and policy terms and conditions become more favorable to the insureds. Conversely, hard markets
occur when there is not enough insurance capital capacity in the market to meet the needs of potential insureds, causing insurance prices to generally rise and
policy terms and conditions to become more favorable to the insurers.
26

Table of Contents
Although an individual insurance company's financial performance depends on its own specific business characteristics, the profitability of most P&C
insurance companies tends to follow this cyclical market pattern. Further, this cyclical market pattern can be more pronounced in the E&S market than in the
standard insurance market. When the standard insurance market hardens, the E&S market typically hardens, and growth in the E&S market can be significantly
more rapid than growth in the standard insurance market. Similarly, when conditions begin to soften, many customers that were previously driven into the E&S
market may return to the admitted market, exacerbating the effects of rate decreases. We cannot predict the timing or duration of changes in the market cycle
because the cyclicality is due in large part to the actions of our competitors and general economic factors. These cyclical patterns cause our revenues and net
income to fluctuate, which may cause the price of our common stock to be volatile.
Our employees could take excessive risks, which could negatively affect our financial condition and business.
As an insurance enterprise, we are in the business of binding certain risks. The employees who conduct our business, including executive officers and other
members of management, underwriters, product managers and other employees, do so in part by making decisions and choices that involve exposing us to risk.
These include decisions such as setting underwriting guidelines and standards, product design and pricing, determining which business opportunities to pursue
and other decisions. We endeavor, in the design and implementation of our compensation programs and practices, to avoid giving our employees incentives to
take excessive risks. Employees may, however, take such risks regardless of the structure of our compensation programs and practices. Similarly, although we
employ controls and procedures designed to monitor employees’ business decisions and prevent them from taking excessive risks, these controls and
procedures may not be effective. If our employees take excessive risks, the impact of those risks could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and business operations.
Competition for business in our industry is intense.
We face competition from other specialty insurance companies, standard insurance companies and underwriting agencies, as well as from diversified financial
services companies that are larger than we are and that have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. Some of these competitors also have
longer experience and more market recognition than we do in certain lines of business. In addition, it may be difficult or prohibitively expensive for us to
implement technology systems and processes that are competitive with the systems and processes of these larger companies.
In particular, competition in the insurance industry is based on many factors, including price of coverage, the general reputation and perceived financial
strength of the company, relationships with brokers, terms and conditions of products offered, ratings assigned by independent rating agencies, speed of claims
payment and reputation, and the experience and reputation of the members of our underwriting team in the particular lines of insurance and reinsurance we
seek to underwrite. See "Business — Competition." In recent years, the insurance industry has undergone increasing consolidation, which may further increase
competition.
A number of new, proposed or potential legislative or industry developments could further increase competition in our industry. These developments include:
•
An increase in capital-raising by companies in our lines of business, which could result in new entrants to our markets and an excess of capital in the
industry;
•
The deregulation of commercial insurance lines in certain states and the possibility of federal regulatory reform of the insurance industry, which could
increase competition from standard carriers; and
•
Changing practices caused by the internet, including shifts in the way in which E&S insurance is purchased. We currently depend largely on the wholesale
distribution model. If the wholesale distribution model were to be significantly altered by changes in the way E&S insurance is marketed, including,
without limitation, through use of the internet, it could have a material adverse effect on our premiums, underwriting results and profits.
We may not be able to continue to compete successfully in the insurance markets. Increased competition in these markets could result in a change in the supply
and demand for insurance, affect our ability to price our products at risk-adequate
27

Table of Contents
rates and retain existing business, or underwrite new business on favorable terms. If this increased competition so limits our ability to transact business, our
operating results could be adversely affected.
If we are unable to underwrite risks accurately and charge competitive yet profitable rates to our policyholders, our business, financial condition and
results of operations will be adversely affected.
In general, the premiums for our insurance policies are established at the time a policy is issued and, therefore, before all of our underlying costs are known.
Like other insurance companies, we rely on estimates and assumptions in setting our premium rates. Establishing adequate premium rates is necessary, together
with investment income, to generate sufficient revenue to offset losses, loss adjustment expenses and other underwriting costs to earn a profit. If we do not
accurately assess the risks that we assume, we may not charge adequate premiums to cover our losses and expenses, which would adversely affect our results of
operations and our profitability. Alternatively, we could set our premiums too high, which could reduce our competitiveness and lead to lower revenues. Pricing
involves the acquisition and analysis of historical loss data and the projection of future trends, loss costs and expenses, and inflation trends, among other
factors, for each of our products in multiple risk tiers and many different markets. In order to accurately price our policies, we must:
•
collect and properly analyze a substantial volume of data from our insureds;
•
develop, test and apply appropriate actuarial projections and ratings formulas;
•
closely monitor and timely recognize changes in trends; and
•
project both frequency and severity of our insureds’ losses with reasonable accuracy.
We seek to implement our pricing accurately in accordance with our assumptions. Our ability to undertake these efforts successfully and, as a result, accurately
price our policies, is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including:
•
insufficient or unreliable data;
•
incorrect or incomplete analysis of available data;
•
uncertainties generally inherent in estimates and assumptions;
•
our failure to implement appropriate actuarial projections and ratings formulas or other pricing methodologies;
•
regulatory constraints on rate increases;
•
our failure to accurately estimate investment yields and the duration of our liability for loss and loss adjustment expenses; and
•
unanticipated court decisions, legislation or regulatory action.
Because our business depends on insurance brokers, we are exposed to certain risks arising out of our reliance on these distribution channels that could
adversely affect our results.
Certain premiums from policyholders, where the business is produced by brokers, are collected directly by the brokers and forwarded to our insurance
subsidiary. In certain jurisdictions, when the insured pays its policy premium to its broker for payment on behalf of our insurance subsidiary, the premium
might be considered to have been paid under applicable insurance laws and regulations. Accordingly, the insured would no longer be liable to us for those
amounts, whether or not we have actually received the premium from that broker. Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with the brokers
with whom we work. Where necessary, we review the financial condition of potential new brokers before we agree to transact business with them. Although the
failure by any of our brokers to remit premiums to us has not been material to date, there may be instances where our brokers collect premiums but do not remit
them to us and we may be required under applicable law to provide the coverage set forth in the policy despite the absence of related premiums being paid to
us.
The possibility of these events occurring depends in large part on the financial condition and internal operations of our brokers. If we are unable to collect
premiums from our brokers in the future, our underwriting profits may decline and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and
adversely affected.
28

Table of Contents
We are subject to reinsurance counterparty credit risk.
Although reinsurance makes the reinsurer liable to us to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, it does not relieve us (the ceding insurer) of
our primary liability to our policyholders. Our reinsurers may not pay claims made by us on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. For
example, reinsurers may default in their financial obligations to us as the result of insolvency, lack of liquidity, operational failure, fraud, asserted defenses
based on agreement wordings or the principle of utmost good faith, asserted deficiencies in the documentation of agreements or other reasons. Any disputes
with reinsurers regarding coverage under reinsurance contracts could be time consuming, costly and uncertain of success. We evaluate each reinsurance claim
based on the facts of the case, historical experience with the reinsurer on similar claims and existing case law and include any amounts deemed uncollectible
from the reinsurer in our reserve for uncollectible reinsurance. As of December 31, 2024, we had $390.6 million of aggregate reinsurance balances on paid and
unpaid losses and ceded unearned premiums. These risks could cause us to incur increased net losses, and, therefore, adversely affect our financial condition.
We may act based on inaccurate or incomplete information regarding the accounts we underwrite.
We rely on information provided by insureds or their representatives when underwriting insurance policies. While we may make inquiries to validate or
supplement the information provided, we may make underwriting decisions based on incorrect or incomplete information. It is possible that we will
misunderstand the nature or extent of the activities or facilities and the corresponding extent of the risks that we insure because of our reliance on inadequate or
inaccurate information.
The failure of our information technology and telecommunications systems could materially adversely affect our business.
Our business depends on our information technology and telecommunications systems, including our web-based underwriting system. Among other things, we
rely on these systems to interact with brokers and insureds, to underwrite business, to prepare policies and process premiums, to perform actuarial and other
modeling functions, to process claims and make claims payments and to prepare internal and external financial statements and information. In addition, some
of these systems include or rely on third-party systems under our direct control. Events such as natural catastrophes, terrorist attacks, industrial accidents, third-
party system or network outages or computer malware may cause our systems to fail or be inaccessible for extended periods of time. While we have
implemented business contingency and other plans to protect our systems, sustained or repeated system failures or service denials could severely limit our
ability to write and process new and renewal business, provide customer service, pay claims in a timely manner or otherwise operate in the ordinary course of
business.
Our operations depend on the reliable and secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other data and information in our computer systems
and networks. Computer malware, hackers, employee misconduct and other external hazards could expose our systems to security breaches, cyber attacks or
other disruptions. In addition, we routinely transmit and receive personal, personally identifiable, sensitive, confidential and proprietary data by electronic
means and are subject to data privacy laws and regulations enacted in the jurisdictions in which we do business.
While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against breaches of security and other interference with our systems and networks, our
systems and networks may be subject to significant breaches or interference. Any such event may result in material operational disruptions as well as
unauthorized access to or the disclosure or loss of our proprietary information or our customers’ data and information, which in turn may result in legal claims,
regulatory scrutiny and liability, the incurrence of costs to eliminate or mitigate further exposure, the loss of customers or affiliated advisors, reputational harm
or other damage to our business. We cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit vulnerabilities
in our systems, data thefts, physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access, or other developments will not compromise or breach the technology
or other security measures protecting the networks and systems used in connection with our business.
29

Table of Contents
We employ third-party and open-source licensed software for use in our business, and the inability to maintain these licenses, errors in the software we
license or the terms of open-source licenses could result in increased costs, or reduced service levels, which would adversely affect our business.
Our business relies on certain third-party software obtained under licenses from other companies. Although we believe that there are commercially reasonable
alternatives to the third-party software we currently license, this may not always be the case, or it may be difficult or costly to replace. In addition, integration
of new third-party software may require significant work and require substantial investment of our time and resources. Our use of additional or alternative
third-party software would require us to enter into license agreements with third parties, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all,
and add complexity to the environment. Many of the risks associated with the use of third-party software cannot be eliminated, and these risks could negatively
affect our business.
Additionally, the software powering our technology systems incorporates software covered by open-source licenses. The terms of many open-source licenses
have not been interpreted by U.S. courts and there is a risk that the licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions
on our ability to operate our systems. In the event that portions of our proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open-source license, we could be
required to publicly release the affected portions of our source code or re-engineer all or a portion of our technology systems, each of which could reduce or
eliminate the value of our technology systems. Such risk could be difficult or impossible to eliminate, and such an event could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Artificial intelligence is an evolving and rapidly growing technology.
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence ("AI") could exacerbate the information technology related risks described above, as well as alter the competitive
landscape. While we anticipate that we will continue to research and implement AI-based technology solutions to both mitigate risk and increase automation in
our environment, it is possible that bad actors and/or competitors will leverage AI solutions more effectively to either exploit vulnerabilities or take market
share. Either outcome could negatively impact our business. We are aware that generative AI tools may respond with inaccurate or fabricated information,
introduce bias or fail to provide traceability of source information and have taken steps to train employees on these issues as well to avoid using these tools as
primary decision processes. We will continue to look for opportunities to deploy these tools to aid in decision making processes but cannot guarantee that the
risks will be completely eliminated.
Cloud provider service failure or control weakness could adversely affect our business.
We employ cloud-based services to host the majority of our applications and intend to continue and expand our use. As we use cloud-based services, we will
rely on third-party cloud providers to maintain appropriate controls and safeguards to protect confidential information we receive, including personal,
personally identifiable, sensitive, confidential or proprietary data, and the integrity and continuous operation of our proprietary technology platform. While we
conduct due diligence on these cloud providers with respect to their security and business controls, these are point-in-time assessments, and we may not have
the visibility to effectively monitor the continuous implementation and efficacy of these controls. Outside parties may be able to circumvent controls or exploit
vulnerabilities, resulting in operational disruption, data loss, defects or a security event. Operating in the cloud increases the risk of operational disruption
should internet service be interrupted. While we have implemented business contingency and other plans to facilitate continuous internet access, sustained or
concurrent service denials or similar failures could limit our ability to write and process new and renewal business, provide customer service, pay claims in a
timely manner or otherwise operate our business. Any such event or failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We may change our underwriting guidelines or our strategy without stockholder approval.
Our management has the authority to change our underwriting guidelines or our strategy without notice to our stockholders and without stockholder approval.
As a result, we may make fundamental changes to our operations without stockholder approval, which could result in our pursuing a strategy or implementing
underwriting guidelines that may be materially different from the strategy or underwriting guidelines described in the section titled "Business" or elsewhere in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
30

Table of Contents
If actual renewals of our existing contracts do not meet expectations, our written premiums in future years and our future results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
Many of our contracts are written for a one-year term. In our financial forecasting process, we make assumptions about the rates of renewal of our prior year’s
contracts. The insurance and reinsurance industries have historically been cyclical businesses with intense competition, often based on price. If actual renewals
do not meet expectations or if we choose not to write a renewal because of pricing conditions, our written premiums in future years and our future operations
would be materially adversely affected.
Our failure to accurately and timely pay claims could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We must accurately and timely evaluate and pay claims that are made under our policies. Many factors affect our ability to pay claims accurately and timely,
including the training and experience of our claims examiners, our claims organization’s culture and the effectiveness of our management, our ability to
develop or select and implement appropriate procedures and systems to support our claims functions and other factors. Our failure to pay claims accurately and
timely could lead to regulatory and administrative actions or material litigation, undermine our reputation in the marketplace and materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In addition, if we do not train new claims employees effectively or if we lose a significant number of experienced claims employees, our claims department’s
ability to handle an increasing workload could be adversely affected. In addition to potentially requiring that growth be slowed in the affected markets, our
business could suffer from decreased quality of claims work which, in turn, could adversely affect our operating margins.
The effects of litigation on our business are uncertain and could have an adverse effect on our business.
As is typical in our industry, we continually face risks associated with litigation of various types, including disputes relating to insurance claims under our
policies as well as other general commercial and corporate litigation. We could become involved in litigation with our customers, or become the target of class
action lawsuits and other types of litigation, some of which involve claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts. The outcomes of litigation are inherently
uncertain and can be influenced by evolving legal trends, including third-party litigation funding. This litigation may be based on a variety of issues, including
insurance and claim settlement practices. We cannot predict with any certainty whether we will be involved in such litigation in the future or what impact such
litigation would have on our business.
Risks Related to Our Investment Portfolio
Performance of our investment portfolio is subject to a variety of investment risks that may adversely affect our financial results.
Our results of operations depend, in part, on the performance of our investment portfolio. We seek to hold a high-quality, diversified portfolio of investments
that is largely managed by professional investment advisory management firms in accordance with our investment policy and routinely reviewed by our
Investment Committee. However, our investments are subject to general economic conditions and market risks as well as risks inherent to particular securities.
Our primary market risk exposures are to changes in interest rates and equity prices. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk." A protracted low interest rate environment would place pressure on our
net investment income, particularly as it relates to fixed-maturity securities and short-term investments, which, in turn, may adversely affect our operating
results. Increases in interest rates could cause the values of our fixed-maturity securities portfolios to decline, thereby negatively impacting our book value. The
magnitude of the decline depends on the duration of securities included in our portfolio and the amount by which interest rates increase. Some fixed-maturity
securities have call or prepayment options, which create possible reinvestment risk in declining rate environments. Other fixed-maturity securities, such as
mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, carry prepayment risk or, in a rising interest rate environment, may not prepay as quickly as expected.
31

Table of Contents
The value of our investment portfolio is subject to the risk that certain investments may default or become impaired due to deterioration in the financial
condition of one or more issuers of the securities we hold, or due to deterioration in the financial condition of an insurer that guarantees an issuer’s payments
on such investments. Downgrades in the credit ratings of fixed maturities also have a significant negative effect on the market valuation of such securities.
Our investment portfolio is subject to increased valuation uncertainties when investment markets are illiquid. The valuation of investments is more subjective
when markets are illiquid, thereby increasing the risk that the estimated fair value (i.e., the carrying amount) of the securities we hold in our portfolio does not
reflect prices at which actual transactions would occur.
We also invest in marketable equity securities. These securities are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and are subject to potential losses and
declines in value, which may never recover. Our equity investments totaled $398.4 million as of December 31, 2024.
Although we seek to preserve our capital, we cannot be certain that our investment objectives will be achieved, and results may vary substantially over time. In
addition, although we seek to employ investment strategies that are not correlated with our insurance and reinsurance exposures, losses in our investment
portfolio may occur at the same time as underwriting losses and, therefore, exacerbate the adverse effect of the losses on us.
Risks Related to Liquidity and Access to Capital
Because we are a holding company and substantially all of our operations are conducted by our insurance subsidiary, our ability to pay dividends depends
on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other permitted payments from our insurance subsidiary.
Because we are a holding company with no business operations of our own, our ability to pay dividends to stockholders largely depends on dividends and other
distributions from our insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance. State insurance laws, including the laws of Arkansas, restrict the ability of Kinsale Insurance to
declare stockholder dividends. State insurance regulators require insurance companies to maintain specified levels of statutory capital and surplus.
Consequently, the maximum dividend distribution is limited by Arkansas law to the greater of 10% of policyholder surplus as of December 31 of the previous
year or net income, not including realized capital gains, for the previous calendar year. Dividend payments are further limited to that part of available
policyholder surplus which is derived from net profits on our business. The maximum amount of dividends Kinsale Insurance could pay us during 2025
without regulatory approval is $351.9 million. State insurance regulators have broad powers to prevent the reduction of statutory surplus to inadequate levels,
and there is no assurance that dividends up to the maximum amounts calculated under any applicable formula would be permitted. Moreover, state insurance
regulators that have jurisdiction over the payment of dividends by our insurance subsidiary may in the future adopt statutory provisions more restrictive than
those currently in effect.
The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors. See "Dividend Policy."
We could be forced to sell investments to meet our liquidity requirements.
We invest the premiums we receive from our insureds until they are needed to pay policyholder claims. Consequently, we seek to manage the duration of our
investment portfolio based on the duration of our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves to ensure sufficient liquidity and avoid having to liquidate
investments to fund claims. Risks such as inadequate loss and loss adjustment reserves or unfavorable trends in litigation could potentially result in the need to
sell investments to fund these liabilities. We may not be able to sell our investments at favorable prices or at all. Sales could result in significant realized losses
depending on the conditions of the general market, interest rates and credit issues with individual securities.
32

Table of Contents
Our credit agreements contain financial and other covenants, the breach of any of which could result in acceleration of payment of amounts due under
our borrowings.
As of December 31, 2024, we had outstanding borrowings of $184.1 million, net of debt issuance costs, in the aggregate under our two bank credit agreements.
The agreements contain certain financial covenants that require us to maintain consolidated net worth in excess of a specified minimum amount, a leverage
ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter not in excess of 0.35 to 1, and minimum liquidity requirements if the maximum aggregate amount of dividends
available to pay to us from Kinsale Insurance is below $50.0 million. The agreements contain other covenants which, among other things, require ongoing
compliance with applicable insurance regulations and require our regulated insurance subsidiary to maintain a rating from A.M. Best not lower than an A-. A
breach of any of these covenants could result in acceleration of our obligations to repay our outstanding indebtedness under such agreements if we are unable
to obtain a waiver or amendment from our lenders, and otherwise could impair our ability to borrow funds or result in higher borrowing costs.
We may require additional capital in the future, which may not be available or may only be available on unfavorable terms.
Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including our ability to write new business successfully and to establish premium rates and reserves at
levels sufficient to cover losses. Many factors will affect the amount and timing of our capital needs, including our growth rate and profitability, our claims
experience, and the availability of reinsurance, market disruptions and other unforeseeable developments. If we need to raise additional capital, equity or debt
financing may not be available at all or may be available only on terms that are not favorable to us. In the case of equity financings, dilution to our stockholders
could result. In the case of debt financings, we may be subject to covenants that restrict our ability to freely operate our business. In any case, such securities
may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of the shares of common stock currently outstanding. If we cannot obtain adequate capital
on favorable terms or at all, we may not have sufficient funds to implement our operating plans and our business, financial condition or results of operations
could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to Regulation
We are subject to extensive regulation, which may adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives. In addition, if we fail to comply with these
regulations, we may be subject to penalties, including fines and suspensions, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance, is subject to extensive regulation in Arkansas, its state of domicile, and to a lesser degree, the other states in which
it operates. Most insurance regulations are designed to protect the interests of insurance policyholders, as opposed to the interests of investors or stockholders.
These regulations generally are administered by a department of insurance in each state and relate to, among other things, authorizations to write E&S lines of
business, capital and surplus requirements, investment and underwriting limitations, affiliate transactions, dividend limitations, changes in control, solvency
and a variety of other financial and non-financial aspects of our business. Significant changes in these laws and regulations could further limit our discretion or
make it more expensive to conduct our business. State insurance regulators also conduct periodic examinations of the affairs of insurance companies and
require the filing of annual and other reports relating to financial condition, holding company issues and other matters. These regulatory requirements may
impose timing and expense constraints that could adversely affect our ability to achieve some or all of our business objectives.
In addition, state insurance regulators have broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the violation of regulations. In some
instances, where there is uncertainty as to applicability, we follow practices based on our interpretations of regulations or practices that we believe generally to
be followed by the industry. These practices may turn out to be different from the interpretations of regulatory authorities. If we do not have the requisite
licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, state insurance regulators could preclude or temporarily suspend us from
carrying on some or all of our activities or could otherwise penalize us. This could adversely affect our ability to operate our business. Further, changes in the
level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or interpretations by regulatory authorities could interfere with our
operations and require us to bear additional costs of compliance, which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
33

Table of Contents
The NAIC has adopted a system to test the adequacy of statutory capital of insurance companies, known as "risk-based capital." This system establishes the
minimum amount of risk-based capital necessary for a company to support its overall business operations. It identifies P&C insurers that may be inadequately
capitalized by looking at certain inherent risks of each insurer's assets and liabilities and its mix of net written premiums. Insurers falling below a calculated
threshold may be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action, including supervision, rehabilitation or liquidation. Failure to maintain our risk-based capital
at the required levels could adversely affect the ability of our insurance subsidiary to maintain regulatory authority to conduct our business. See also
"Regulation — Required licensing."
We may become subject to additional government or market regulation.
Our business could be adversely affected by changes in state laws, including those relating to asset and reserve valuation requirements, surplus requirements,
limitations on investments and dividends, enterprise risk and risk-based capital requirements and, at the federal level, by laws and regulations that may affect
certain aspects of the insurance industry, including proposals for preemptive federal regulation. The U.S. federal government generally has not directly
regulated the insurance industry except for certain areas of the market, such as insurance for flood, nuclear and terrorism risks. However, the federal
government has undertaken initiatives or considered legislation in several areas that may affect the insurance industry, including tort reform, corporate
governance and the taxation of reinsurance companies.
The Dodd-Frank Act also established the FIO and vested the FIO with the authority to monitor all aspects of the insurance sector, including to monitor the
extent to which traditionally underserved communities and consumers have access to affordable non-health insurance products. In addition, the FIO has the
ability to recommend to the Financial Stability Oversight Council the designation of an insurer as "systemically significant" and therefore subject to regulation
by the Federal Reserve as a bank holding company. Any additional regulations established as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act could increase our costs of
compliance or lead to disciplinary action. In addition, legislation has been introduced from time to time that, if enacted, could result in the federal government
assuming a more direct role in the regulation of the insurance industry, including federal licensing in addition to or in lieu of state licensing and requiring
reinsurance for natural catastrophes. We are unable to predict whether any legislation will be enacted or any regulations will be adopted, or the effect any such
developments could have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
34

Table of Contents
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Risk management and strategy
The Company’s risk management process includes assessing, identifying and managing material risks from various sources, including those related to
cybersecurity. The Company uses information from incident history, industry publications and analysis centers, public news, government information sharing
and recognized information security frameworks to inform its risk management program. Management employs a suite of detective and preventative
cybersecurity measures including, but not limited to
•
Maintaining a vulnerability management program,
•
implementing and operating controls over logical access provisioning,
•
maintaining an enterprise-wide security awareness program and
•
administering periodic trainings.
The Company engages multiple vendors with subject matter and technological expertise in various aspects of cybersecurity management, including continuous
threat detection and response coverage, endpoint detection, anti-malware, penetration testing and suspicious activity alerting, among others. When the
Company engages third parties, management retains responsibility for the security and resiliency of its information assets. The Company maintains an incident
response plan that includes escalation criteria and preliminary materiality assessments to guide business continuity and disclosure objectives.
We describe risks related to cybersecurity threats that could materially impact our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition under the
heading “Risk Factors.” Material impacts could include loss of access to systems and data, financial costs and reputational harm, among others.
Governance
Our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") is responsible for assessing and managing overall material risks to the Company. With respect to cybersecurity risks, our
CEO leverages the collective expertise of the Company’s information security function which reports to our CEO through the Company’s Chief Information
Officer. The information security function is staffed with individuals with extensive information security employment experience, including in the financial
services sector, educational experience and relevant credentials. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee") is responsible for
receiving periodic updates on cybersecurity and information security risks, reviewing and discussing with management the quality and effectiveness of the
Company’s efforts to mitigate such risks and reporting such findings to the Board of Directors. Management informs the Audit Committee about prevention,
detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity incidents at least semi-annually and monitors such matters continuously.
In 2025, the oversight over the Company's cybersecurity risk will transition from the Audit Committee to the Board of Directors ("the Board") to align with the
Board's oversight of operational risks.
Item 2. Properties
We own our executive and insurance offices located in Richmond, Virginia, and we currently occupy approximately 110,000 square feet of the 137,000 square
feet of available office space.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs.
35

Table of Contents
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to legal proceedings in the normal course of operating our insurance business. We are not involved in any legal proceedings which reasonably
could be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Refer to Note 12 of the notes to the
consolidated financial statements for further information regarding legal proceedings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
36

Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Price for Common Stock
Our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "KNSL" on July 28, 2016. Before then, there was no
public market for our common stock. Effective January 3, 2022, the Company transferred its common stock listing from the Nasdaq to the New York Stock
Exchange ("NYSE") and continued to trade under its current symbol "KNSL." As of February 14, 2025, we had 137 stockholders of record of our common
stock.
Dividend Policy
We currently expect to pay quarterly cash dividends in the future; however, the declaration, payment and amount of future dividends is subject to the discretion
of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors gives consideration to various risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under the headings "Risk
Factors" and "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
when determining whether to declare and pay dividends, as well as the amount thereof. Our Board of Directors may take into account a variety of factors when
determining whether to declare any dividends, including (1) our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations (including our ability to generate cash flow
in excess of expenses and our expected or actual net income), retained earnings and capital requirements, (2) general business conditions, (3) legal, tax and
regulatory limitations, (4) contractual prohibitions and other restrictions, (5) the effect of a dividend or dividends on our financial strength ratings and (6) any
other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Our status as a holding company and a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries affects our ability to pay dividends and make other payments. As
a holding company without significant operations of our own, the principal sources of our funds are dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries. The
ability of our insurance subsidiary to pay dividends to us is subject to limits under insurance laws of the state in which our insurance subsidiary is domiciled.
See "Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry – Because we are a holding company and substantially all of our operations are conducted
by our insurance subsidiary, our ability to pay dividends and service our debt obligations depends on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other permitted
payments from our insurance subsidiary" and "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and
Capital Resources."
37

Table of Contents
Performance Graph
The performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return of an investment in (1) our common stock, (2) the cumulative total returns to S&P
500 and (3) the cumulative total returns to the S&P 500 P&C Index for the period from December 31, 2019 through December 31, 2024.
The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 and the reinvestment of dividends, if any. Such returns are based on historical results and are not indicative of
future performance.
December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
$
100.00 
$
197.28 
$
235.07 
$
258.97  $
332.19  $
461.94 
S&P 500
$
100.00 
$
118.40 
$
152.39 
$
124.79  $
157.59  $
197.02 
S&P 500 P&C Index
$
100.00 
$
106.96 
$
127.58 
$
151.65  $
168.05  $
227.67 
38

Table of Contents
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth information regarding repurchases by the Company of its common stock during the periods indicated.
Period
Beginning
Period
Ending
Total
number
of shares
purchased
Average
price
paid per
share
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs
Approximate
dollar value
of
shares that
may yet be purchased
under the
plans or programs
(in millions)
October 1, 2024
October 31, 2024
22,626 
$
441.95 
22,626 
$
90.0 
November 1, 2024
November 30, 2024
— 
$
— 
— 
$
90.0 
December 1, 2024
December 31, 2024
— 
$
— 
— 
$
90.0 
Total
22,626 
$
441.95 
22,626 
$
90.0 
(1) In October 2024, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of the
Company's common stock. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in open market purchases, privately-negotiated transactions, block purchases,
accelerated share repurchase agreements or a combination of methods and pursuant to safe harbors provided by Rule 10b-18 and Rule 10b5-1 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases under the share repurchase program will be determined by the
Company in its discretion. The stock repurchase program does not require the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be modified,
suspended or terminated at any time.
(1)
39

Table of Contents
Item 6. Reserved
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The discussion and analysis below include certain forward-looking
statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in "Risk Factors" that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied by, those forward-looking statements. See "Forward-Looking Statements."
Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to year ended December 31, 2022
For a comparison of years ended December 31, 2023 and December 2022, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, which was filed with the SEC on February 23,
2024.
Overview
Founded in 2009, we are an established and growing specialty insurance company. We focus exclusively on the E&S market in the U.S., where we use our
underwriting expertise to write coverages for hard-to-place, small- to medium-sized business risks and personal lines risks. We sell these insurance products in
all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands primarily through a network of independent insurance
brokers. We have an experienced and cohesive management team that has an average of over 30 years of relevant experience.
We have one reportable segment, our Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance segment, which offers P&C insurance products through the E&S market. In 2024, the
percentage breakdown of our gross written premiums was 67.4% casualty and 32.6% property. Our commercial lines offerings and homeowner's coverage in
the personal lines market represented 97.4% and 2.6% of our gross written premiums, respectively. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements
for gross written premiums by underwriting division.
Our goal is to deliver long-term value for our stockholders by growing our business and generating attractive returns. We seek to accomplish this by generating
consistent and strong underwriting profits while managing our capital prudently. We believe that we have built a company that is entrepreneurial and highly
efficient, using our proprietary technology platform and leveraging the expertise of our highly-experienced employees in our daily operations. We believe our
systems and technology are at the digital forefront of the insurance industry, allowing us to quickly collect and analyze data, thereby improving our ability to
manage our business and reducing response times for our customers. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves from our competitors by effectively
leveraging technology, vigilantly controlling expenses and maintaining control over our underwriting and claims management.
Components of Our Results of Operations
Gross written premiums
Gross written premiums are the amounts received or to be received for insurance policies written or assumed by us during a specific period of time without
reduction for policy acquisition costs, reinsurance costs or other deductions. The volume of our gross written premiums in any given period is generally
influenced by:
•
New business submissions;
40

Table of Contents
•
Conversion of new business submissions into policies;
•
Renewals of existing policies; and
•
Average size and premium rate of bound policies.
We earn insurance premiums on a pro rata basis over the term of the policy. Our insurance policies generally have a term of one year. Net earned premiums
represent the earned portion of our gross written premiums, less that portion of our gross written premiums that is ceded to third-party reinsurers under our
reinsurance agreements.
Ceded written premiums
Ceded written premiums are the amount of gross written premiums ceded to reinsurers. We enter into reinsurance contracts to limit our exposure to potential
large losses. Ceded written premiums are earned over the reinsurance contract period in proportion to the period of risk covered. The volume of our ceded
written premiums is impacted by the level of our gross written premiums and any decision we make to increase or decrease retention levels.
Fee income
Fee income includes policy fees charged to insureds and is recognized in earnings when the related premium is written. Policy fees are a flat charge to insureds
and fee income is impacted primarily by the volume of business we write.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
Losses and loss adjustment expenses are a function of the amount and type of insurance contracts we write and the loss experience associated with the
underlying coverage. In general, our losses and loss adjustment expenses are affected by:
•
Frequency of claims associated with the particular types of insurance contracts that we write;
•
Trends in the average size of losses incurred on a particular type of business;
•
Mix of business written by us;
•
Changes in the legal or regulatory environment related to the business we write;
•
Trends in legal defense costs;
•
Wage inflation;
•
Social inflation;
•
Inflation in material costs, and
•
Inflation in medical costs.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses are based on an actuarial analysis of the estimated losses, including losses incurred during the period and changes in
estimates from prior periods. Losses and loss adjustment expenses may be paid out over a period of years.
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses include policy acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses. Policy acquisition costs are principally
comprised of the commissions we pay our brokers, net of ceding commissions we receive on business ceded under certain reinsurance contracts. Policy
acquisition costs also include deferred underwriting expenses that are directly related to the successful acquisition of policies. The amortization of
41

Table of Contents
such policy acquisition costs is charged to expense in proportion to premium earned over the policy life. Other underwriting expenses represent the general and
administrative expenses of our insurance business such as employment costs, telecommunication and technology costs, and legal and auditing fees.
Net investment income
Net investment income is an important component of our results of operations. We earn investment income on our portfolio of cash and invested assets. Our
cash and invested assets are primarily comprised of fixed-maturity securities, and may also include equity securities, investments in real estate, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments. The principal factors that influence the level of net investment income are the size of our investment portfolio and the
yield on that portfolio. As measured by amortized cost (which excludes changes in fair value), the size of our investment portfolio is mainly a function of our
invested equity capital combined with premiums we receive from our insureds less payments on policyholder claims. Net investment income also includes
rental income and depreciation expense from our real estate investment property.
Change in fair value of equity securities
Change in fair value of equity securities consists of two components: (1) the reversal of the gain or loss recognized in previous periods on equity securities sold
and (2) the change in unrealized gain or loss resulting from mark-to-market adjustments on equity securities still held.
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Net realized investment gains (losses) are a function of the difference between the amount received by us on the sale of a security and the security's amortized
cost.
Income tax expense
Currently, substantially all of our income tax expense is comprised of federal income taxes. Our insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance, is not subject to
income taxes in the states in which it operates; however, our non-insurance subsidiaries are subject to state income taxes but have not generated any material
taxable income to date. The amount of income tax expense or benefit recorded in future periods will depend on the jurisdictions in which we operate and the
tax laws and regulations in effect.
Key metrics
We discuss certain key metrics, described below, which we believe provide useful information about our business and the operational factors underlying our
financial performance.
Underwriting income is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define underwriting income as net income, excluding net investment income, net change in the fair
value of equity securities, net realized investment gains and losses, change in allowance for credit losses on investments, interest expense, other income, other
expenses and income tax expense. See "—Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of net income in accordance with GAAP to
underwriting income.
Net operating earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define net operating earnings as net income excluding the net change in the fair value of equity
securities, after taxes, net realized investment gains and losses, after taxes and change in allowance for credit losses on investments, after taxes. See "—
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of net income in accordance with GAAP to net operating earnings.
Loss ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses to the sum of net earned premiums and fee income.
42

Table of Contents
Expense ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses to the sum of net earned premiums and fee income.
Combined ratio is the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio as presented. A combined ratio under 100% indicates an underwriting profit. A combined ratio
over 100% indicates an underwriting loss.
Return on equity is net income as a percentage of average beginning and ending total stockholders’ equity during the period.
Operating return on equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define operating return on equity as net operating earnings expressed as a percentage of
average beginning and ending stockholders’ equity during the period. See "—Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of net
income in accordance with GAAP to net operating earnings.
Net retention ratio is the ratio of net written premiums to gross written premiums.
Gross investment return is investment income from fixed-maturity and equity securities (and short-term investments, if any), before any deductions for fees and
expenses, expressed as a percentage of the average beginning and ending book values of those investments during the period.
43

Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2024 compared to year ended December 31, 2023
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)
2024
2023
Change
% Change
Gross written premiums
$
1,870,341 
$
1,568,815 
$
301,526 
19.2 %
Ceded written premiums
(392,993)
(304,185)
(88,808)
29.2 %
Net written premiums
$
1,477,348 
$
1,264,630 
$
212,718 
16.8 %
Net earned premiums
$
1,350,470 
$
1,072,537 
$
277,933 
25.9 %
Fee income
34,118 
27,026 
7,092 
26.2 %
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
772,899 
600,219 
172,680 
28.8 %
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses
285,808 
228,970 
56,838 
24.8 %
Underwriting income 
325,881 
270,374 
55,507 
20.5 %
Net investment income
150,287 
102,335 
47,952 
46.9 %
Change in fair value of equity securities
43,367 
15,277 
28,090 
NM
Net realized investment gains
6,831 
6,040 
791 
NM
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments
526 
(187)
713 
NM
Interest expense
(10,134)
(10,301)
167 
(1.6)%
Other (expenses) income, net
(2,042)
479 
(2,521)
NM
Income before taxes
514,716 
384,017 
130,699 
34.0 %
Income tax expense
99,873 
75,924 
23,949 
31.5 %
Net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
$
106,750 
34.6 %
Net operating earnings 
$
374,771 
$
291,400 
$
83,371 
28.6 %
Loss ratio
55.8 %
54.6 %
Expense ratio
20.6 %
20.8 %
Combined ratio 
76.4 %
75.4 %
Return on equity
32.3 %
33.6 %
Operating return on equity 
29.2 %
31.8 %
NM - Percentage change is not meaningful
Underwriting income is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "—Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of net income in accordance
with GAAP to underwriting income.
Net operating earnings and operating return on equity are non-GAAP financial measures. Net operating earnings is defined as net income excluding the net change in
the fair value of equity securities, after taxes, net realized investment gains and losses, after taxes, and change in allowance for credit losses on investments, after taxes.
Operating return on equity is defined as net operating earnings expressed as a percentage of average beginning and ending total stockholders’ equity during the period.
See "—Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of net income in accordance with GAAP to net operating earnings.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(2)
(1) 
(2) 
44

Table of Contents
The combined ratio is the sum of the loss ratio and expense ratio as presented. Calculations of each component may not add due to rounding.
Net income was $414.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $308.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of
$106.8 million, or 34.6%. The increase in net income in 2024 over 2023 was primarily due to a combination of continued profitable growth and strong
investing results including higher investment income and higher unrealized gains on equity investments.
Underwriting income was $325.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $270.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an
increase of $55.5 million, or 20.5%. The increase in underwriting income was primarily due to continued growth in the business offset in part by higher
catastrophe losses. The corresponding combined ratios were 76.4% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 75.4% for the year ended December 31,
2023.
Premiums
Gross written premiums were $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase
of $301.5 million, or 19.2%. The increase in gross written premiums for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to higher submission activity
from brokers and a favorable, yet increasingly competitive, pricing environment. The average premium per policy written by us was $15,100 in 2024 compared
to $15,200 in 2023. Excluding our personal insurance division, which has relatively low premiums per policy written, the average premium per policy written
was $15,900 in 2024 compared to $16,400 in 2023. Gross written premiums increased across substantially all of our underwriting divisions for the year ended
December 31, 2024 and were most notable in the following lines of business:
•
General Casualty, which represented approximately 9.0% of our gross written premiums in 2024, increased by $50.4 million, or 42.5%, for the year ended
December 31, 2024;
•
Excess Casualty, which represented approximately 13.1% of our gross written premiums in 2024, increased by $51.1 million, or 26.3%, for the year ended
December 31, 2024;
•
Small Business Casualty, which represented approximately 10.5% of our gross written premiums in 2024, increased by $21.5 million, or 12.4%, for the
year ended December 31, 2024;
•
Commercial Property, which represented approximately 24.4% of our gross written premiums in 2024, increased by $44.2 million, or 10.7%, for the year
ended December 31, 2024 and
•
Construction, which represented approximately 7.8% of our gross written premiums in 2024, increased by $10.4 million, or 7.6%, for the year ended
December 31, 2024.
Net written premiums increased by $212.7 million, or 16.8%, to $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $1.3 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2023. The increase in net written premiums was largely due to higher gross written premiums for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our net
retention ratio was 79.0% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 80.6% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the net retention
ratio was primarily due to a higher cession rate on the commercial property quota share treaty effective with the June 2023 renewal, offset in part by an
increase in our retention on our casualty treaty effective with the June 2024 renewal.
Net earned premiums were $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of
$277.9 million, or 25.9%. As previously discussed, the increase was due to growth in gross written premiums in 2024 compared to 2023.
(3) 
45

Table of Contents
Loss ratio
The following table summarizes the effect of the factors indicated above on the loss ratios for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
($ in thousands)
Losses and Loss
Adjustment
Expenses
% of Sum of Earned
Premiums and Fee
Income
Losses and Loss
Adjustment
Expenses
% of Sum of Earned
Premiums and Fee
Income
Loss ratio:
Current accident year
$
785,036 
56.7 %
$
631,407 
57.4 %
Current accident year - catastrophe losses
25,518 
1.8 %
4,586 
0.4 %
Effect of prior year development
(37,655)
(2.7)%
(35,774)
(3.2)%
Total
$
772,899 
55.8 %
$
600,219 
54.6 %
Our loss ratio was 55.8% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 54.6% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in the loss ratio for
the year ended December 31, 2024 was due primarily to higher catastrophe losses incurred during the period and lower relative net favorable development of
loss reserves from prior accident years. During the year ended December 31, 2024, current year incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses included $25.5
million of net catastrophe losses primarily attributable to Hurricanes Milton, Helene and Francine and tornadoes in the Midwest.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, prior accident years developed favorably by $37.7 million, of which $57.6 million was attributable to the 2021
through 2023 accident years due to lower emergence of reported losses than expected across most lines of business. This favorable development was offset in
part by adverse development primarily from the 2017 through 2019 accident years due to construction defect claims that are more exposed to inflation, from
the 2020 accident year due to a large property claim and more conservative actuarial assumptions in the 2021 through 2023 accident years for lines of business
exposed to construction liability.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, prior accident years developed favorably by $35.8 million, of which $49.0 million was attributable to the 2021 and
2022 accident years due to lower emergence of reported losses than expected across most lines of business. This favorable development was offset in part by
adverse development largely from the 2017 through 2019 accident years due to construction defect claims that are more exposed to inflation.
46

Table of Contents
Expense ratio
The following table summarizes the components of the expense ratio for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
($ in thousands)
Underwriting
Expenses
% of Sum of Earned
Premiums and Fee
Income
Underwriting
Expenses
% of Sum of Earned
Premiums and Fee
Income
Net commissions incurred
$
134,184 
9.7 %
$
113,717 
10.3 %
Other underwriting expenses
151,624 
10.9 %
115,253 
10.5 %
Underwriting, acquisition, and insurance expenses
$
285,808 
20.6 %
$
228,970 
20.8 %
The expense ratio was 20.6% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 20.8% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the expense
ratio was primarily due to lower relative net commissions as a result of higher ceding commissions earned under the commercial property quota share treaty as
a result of commercial property premium growth. Direct commissions paid as a percent of gross written premiums was 14.7% and 14.5% for the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Investing results
The following table summarizes the components of net investment income, change in the fair value of equity securities, net realized investment gains and
change in allowance for credit losses on investments for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)
2024
2023
Change
Interest from fixed-maturity securities
$
144,834 
$
94,444 
$
50,390 
Dividends on equity securities
6,442 
5,097 
1,345 
Cash equivalents and short-term investments
3,012 
3,004 
8 
Real estate investment income
153 
3,716 
(3,563)
Gross investment income
154,441 
106,261 
48,180 
Investment expenses
(4,154)
(3,926)
(228)
Net investment income
150,287 
102,335 
47,952 
Change in the fair value of equity securities
43,367 
15,277 
28,090 
Net realized investment gains
6,831 
6,040 
791 
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments
526 
(187)
713 
Net unrealized and realized investment gains
50,724 
21,130 
29,594 
Total
$
201,011 
$
123,465 
$
77,546 
Our net investment income increased by 46.9% to $150.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $102.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2023, primarily due to growth in our investment portfolio largely generated from the investment of strong operating cash flows and higher interest rates relative
to the prior year period.
47

Table of Contents
The weighted average duration of our investment portfolio, including cash equivalents, was 3.0 years and 2.8 years at December 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash equivalents and unrealized gains and losses, had a gross investment return of 4.4% as of December 31,
2024, compared to 4.0% as of December 31, 2023.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the change in the fair value of equity securities of $43.4 million included appreciation of common stocks, ETFs and
non-redeemable preferred stocks of $23.7 million, $16.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, generally consistent with the changes in the broader U.S. stock
market.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the change in the fair value of equity securities of $15.3 million included changes in unrealized gains related to
ETFs and common stocks of $12.8 million and unrealized gains related to non-redeemable preferred stock of $2.5 million. The change in the fair value of ETFs
and common stocks during 2023 primarily reflected changes in the broader U.S. stock market.
We perform quarterly reviews of all available-for-sale securities within our investment portfolio to determine whether the decline in a security's fair value is
deemed to be a credit loss. Based on our review, we recorded a reduction to credit loss expense of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024
compared to credit loss expense of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for
further information regarding credit losses.
Income tax expense
Our effective tax rate was approximately 19.4% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 19.8% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The
effective tax rate was lower than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the tax benefits from stock-based compensation, including stock options
exercised, and tax-exempt investment income.
Return on equity
Our return on equity was 32.3% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 33.6% for the year ended December 31, 2023. Operating return on equity
was 29.2% for 2024, a decrease from 31.8% for 2023. The decrease in operating return on equity was due primarily to higher average stockholders' equity as a
result of continued profitable growth.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and uses of funds
We are organized as a Delaware holding company with our operations primarily conducted by our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance,
which is domiciled in Arkansas. Accordingly, Kinsale primarily receives cash through (1) loans from banks, (2) issuance of equity and debt securities, (3)
corporate service fees from our insurance subsidiary, (4) payments from our subsidiaries pursuant to our consolidated tax allocation agreement and other
transactions and (5) dividends from our insurance subsidiary. We may use the proceeds from these sources to contribute funds to Kinsale Insurance in order to
support premium growth, reduce our reliance on reinsurance, pay dividends and taxes, repurchase shares and for other business purposes.
We receive corporate service fees from Kinsale Insurance to reimburse us for most of the operating expenses that we incur. Reimbursement of expenses
through corporate service fees is based on the actual costs that we expect to incur with no mark-up above our expected costs.
We file a consolidated federal income tax return with our subsidiaries, and under our corporate tax allocation agreement, each participant is charged or
refunded taxes according to the amount that the participant would have paid or received had it filed on a separate return basis with the Internal Revenue
Service.
48

Table of Contents
State insurance laws restrict the ability of Kinsale Insurance to declare stockholder dividends without prior regulatory approval. State insurance regulators
require insurance companies to maintain specified levels of statutory capital and surplus. The maximum dividend distribution Kinsale Insurance may make
absent the approval or non-disapproval of the insurance regulatory authority in Arkansas is limited by Arkansas law to the greater of (1) 10% of policyholder
surplus as of December 31 of the previous year, or (2) net income, not including realized capital gains, for the previous calendar year. The Arkansas statute also
requires that dividends and other distributions be paid out of positive unassigned surplus without prior approval. The maximum amount of dividends Kinsale
Insurance can pay us during 2025 without regulatory approval is $351.9 million. Insurance regulators have broad powers to ensure that statutory surplus
remains at adequate levels, and there is no assurance that dividends of the maximum amount calculated under any applicable formula would be permitted. In
the future, state insurance regulatory authorities that have jurisdiction over the payment of dividends by Kinsale Insurance may adopt statutory provisions more
restrictive than those currently in effect. Kinsale Insurance paid $47.0 million of dividends to us during 2024. See also "Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our
Business and Our Industry — Because we are a holding company and substantially all of our operations are conducted by our insurance subsidiary, our ability
to pay dividends depends on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other permitted payments from our insurance subsidiary."
As of December 31, 2024, our holding company had $12.3 million in cash and investments, compared to $17.1 million as of December 31, 2023.
Management believes there is sufficient liquidity available at the holding company and in its insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance, as well as in its other
operating subsidiaries, to meet its operating cash needs and obligations for the next 12 months.
Real Estate
In December of 2022, we acquired real estate property adjacent to our current headquarters for $76.6 million. The property is comprised of two office buildings
totaling over 580,000 square feet and a parking deck situated on approximately 29 acres of land. During 2023, we sold one office building and the parking deck
for approximately $62.0 million in cash, net of seller’s costs, and determined we would occupy the remaining building for future expansion of our operations.
Upon this determination, we reclassified the carrying value of the building to property and equipment within other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The
building is currently under development for the Company's future headquarters and is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2025. Capital
expenditures related to the renovation of the building may be funded through draw downs on our Credit Facility. The remaining $15.0 million presented on the
consolidated balance sheet represents the portion of remaining real estate assets held for investment purposes.
Debt
In July 2022, we entered into a Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (the "Note Purchase Agreement"), which provides for the issuance of senior
promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million. In September 2023, we entered into an amendment to the Note Purchase
Agreement, which increased the authorized aggregate principal amount of senior promissory notes that may be issued thereunder to $200.0 million.
Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, on July 22, 2022 we issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.15% senior promissory notes (the "Series
A Notes") and on September 18, 2023 we issued a $50.0 million aggregate principal amount 6.21% senior promissory note (the "Series B Note"), the proceeds
of which were used to fund surplus at Kinsale Insurance, refinance indebtedness and for general corporate purposes. See Note 11 for further information
regarding the Note Purchase Agreement.
In July 2022, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which extended the maturity date to July 22, 2027, and increased the aggregate
commitment to $100.0 million, with the option to increase the aggregate
49

Table of Contents
commitment by $30.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate
purposes (which may include, without limitation, to fund future growth, to finance working capital needs, to fund capital expenditures, and to refinance,
redeem or repay indebtedness). See Note 11 for further information regarding the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
Shelf registration
In August 2022, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC that expires in 2025. We can use this shelf registration to issue an unspecified
amount of common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants. The specific terms of any securities we issue under this registration statement will be
provided in the applicable prospectus supplements.
In November 2022, we completed an underwritten public offering and sold and issued 155,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $308.30 per share, to
the underwriter. We received net proceeds from the offering of $47.5 million, which was used for general corporate purposes, including to fund organic growth.
Share repurchase program
In October 2024, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of our common stock. The
shares may be repurchased from time to time in open market purchases, privately-negotiated transactions, block purchases, accelerated share repurchase
agreements or a combination of methods and pursuant to safe harbors provided by Rule 10b-18 and Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases under the share repurchase program will be determined by us in our discretion. The stock repurchase
program does not require us to repurchase any specific number of shares, and may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time. At December 31, 2024,
the Company had $90.0 million of capacity remaining under its share repurchase program.
Cash flows
Our most significant source of cash is from premiums received from our insureds, which, for most policies, we receive at the beginning of the coverage period.
Our most significant cash outflow is for claims that arise when a policyholder incurs an insured loss. Because the payment of claims occurs after the receipt of
the premium, often years later, we invest the cash in various investment securities that earn interest and dividends. We also use cash to pay commissions to
brokers, as well as to pay for ongoing operating expenses such as salaries, consulting services and taxes. As described under "—Reinsurance" below, we use
reinsurance to manage the risk that we take on our policies. We cede, or pay out, part of the premiums we receive to our reinsurers and collect cash back when
losses subject to our reinsurance coverage are paid.
The timing of our cash flows from operating activities can vary among periods due to the timing by which payments are made or received. Some of our
payments and receipts, including loss settlements and subsequent reinsurance receipts, can be significant, so their timing can influence cash flows from
operating activities in any given period. Management believes that cash receipts from premiums, proceeds from investment sales and redemptions and
investment income are sufficient to cover cash outflows in the foreseeable future.
50

Table of Contents
Our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
Operating activities
$
976,301 
$
859,835 
Investing activities
(960,125)
(860,892)
Financing activities
(29,657)
(28,523)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
$
(13,481)
$
(29,580)
We have historically generated positive operating cash flows allowing our cash and invested assets to grow. The increase in cash provided by operating
activities in 2024 compared to 2023 was due primarily to growth in business and the timing of claim payments and reinsurance recoveries.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in investing activities of $960.1 million reflected growth in our business operations. For the year ended
December 31, 2024, funds from operations were used to purchase fixed-maturity securities, particularly corporate bonds and asset- and mortgage-backed
securities of $1.6 billion, and to a lesser extent, municipal bonds of $3.7 million and sovereigns of $0.8 million. During 2024, we received proceeds of $289.4
million from sales of fixed-maturity securities, largely corporate bonds and mortgage- and asset-backed securities and $452.4 million from redemptions of
asset- and mortgage-backed securities and corporate and municipal bonds. For the year ended December 31, 2024, purchases of equity securities of $156.5
million primarily consisted of common stocks and, to a lesser extent, ETFs. Proceeds from sales of equity securities of $34.4 million consisted of primarily
ETFs and common stocks and, to a lesser extent, calls of non-redeemable preferred stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $860.9 million. For the year ended December 31, 2023, funds from operations
were used to purchase fixed-maturity securities, particularly corporate bonds and asset- and mortgage-backed securities of $1.3 billion, and to a lesser extent,
sovereigns and government agency bonds of $26.3 million and municipal bonds of $4.9 million. During 2023, we received proceeds of $245.6 million from
sales of fixed-maturity securities, largely corporate bonds and mortgage- and asset-backed securities and $176.5 million from redemptions of asset- and
mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds. For the year ended December 31, 2023, purchases of equity securities of $86.6 million primarily consisted of
common stocks. Proceeds from sales of equity securities of $30.6 million consisted of primarily ETFs and common stocks. In addition, net sales of short-term
investments of $36.7 million consisted of U.S. Treasuries, government agency and corporate bonds. Net cash used in investing activities also included proceeds
of $62.0 million from the sale of a portion of our real estate investment property in the third quarter of 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in financing activities was $29.7 million and reflected dividends of $0.60 per common share, or $13.9
million in the aggregate and share repurchases of $10.0 million. Payroll taxes withheld and remitted on restricted stock awards were $7.0 million, offset in part
by proceeds received from our equity compensation plan of $1.3 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $28.5 million and reflected proceeds of $50.0 million from the issuance of the
Series B Note on September 18, 2023. Proceeds from the sale of our real estate investment were used to pay down $62.0 million from our Credit Facility.
Financing activities also reflected dividends of $0.56 per common share, or $13.0 million in the aggregate. Proceeds received from our equity compensation
plan were $0.9 million, offset by payroll taxes withheld and remitted on restricted stock awards of $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
51

Table of Contents
Reinsurance
We enter into reinsurance contracts to limit our exposure to potential large losses. Our reinsurance is primarily contracted under quota-share reinsurance treaties
and excess of loss treaties. In quota-share reinsurance, the reinsurer agrees to assume a specified percentage of the ceding company's losses arising out of a
defined class of business in exchange for a corresponding percentage of premiums, net of a ceding commission. In excess of loss reinsurance, the reinsurer
agrees to assume all or a portion of the ceding company's losses, in excess of a specified amount. In excess of loss reinsurance, the premium payable to the
reinsurer is negotiated by the parties based on their assessment of the amount of risk being ceded to the reinsurer because the reinsurer does not share
proportionately in the ceding company's losses.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, property insurance represented 32.6% of our gross written premiums. When we write property insurance, we buy
reinsurance to significantly mitigate our risk to large losses. We use sophisticated computer models to analyze the risk of severe losses from weather-related
events and earthquakes. We measure exposure to these catastrophe losses in terms of PML, which is an estimate of what level of loss we would expect to
experience in a windstorm or earthquake event occurring once in every 100 or 250 years. We manage this PML by purchasing catastrophe reinsurance
coverage. Effective June 1, 2024, we purchased catastrophe reinsurance coverage of $175.0 million per event in excess of our $60.0 million per event retention.
Our property catastrophe reinsurance includes a reinstatement provision which requires us to pay reinstatement premiums after a loss has occurred in order to
preserve coverage. Including the reinstatement provision, the maximum aggregate loss recovery limit is $350.0 million and is in addition to the coverage
provided by our other property reinsurance.
Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us from our obligations to policyholders. Failure of the reinsurer to honor its obligation could result in losses to us, and
therefore, we established an allowance for credit risk based on historical analysis of credit losses for highly rated companies in the insurance industry. The
Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentration of credit risk arising from its exposure to individual reinsurers. As of
December 31, 2024, Kinsale Insurance has only contracted with reinsurers with A.M. Best financial strength ratings of "A-" (Excellent) or better. At
December 31, 2024, the net reinsurance receivable, defined as the sum of paid and unpaid reinsurance recoverables, ceded unearned premiums less reinsurance
payables, from five reinsurers represented 62.2% of the total balance. At December 31, 2024, we recorded an allowance for credit losses of $0.9 million related
to our reinsurance balances.
Ratings
Kinsale Insurance has a financial strength rating of "A" (Excellent) from A.M. Best. A.M. Best assigns ratings to insurance companies, which currently range
from "A++" (Superior) to "F" (In Liquidation). "A" (Excellent) is the third highest rating issued by A.M. Best. The "A" (Excellent) rating is assigned to
insurers that have, in A.M. Best's opinion, an excellent ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders. This rating is intended to provide an
independent opinion of an insurer's ability to meet its obligation to policyholders and is not an evaluation directed at investors. See also "Risk Factors — Risks
Related to Our Business and Our Industry — A decline in our financial strength rating may adversely affect the amount of business we write."
The financial strength ratings assigned by A.M. Best have an impact on the ability of the insurance companies to attract and retain agents and brokers and on
the risk profiles of the submissions for insurance that the insurance companies receive. The "A" (Excellent) rating obtained by Kinsale Insurance is consistent
with our business plan and allows us to actively pursue relationships with the agents and brokers identified in our marketing plan.
52

Table of Contents
Contractual obligations and commitments
Reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses
Reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses represent our best estimate of the ultimate cost of settling reported and unreported claims and related
expenses. The estimation of loss and loss expense reserves is based on various complex and subjective judgments. Actual losses and settlement expenses paid
may deviate, perhaps substantially, from the reserve estimates reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Similarly, the timing for payment of our
estimated losses is not fixed and is not determinable on an individual or aggregate basis due to the uncertainty inherent in the process of estimating such
payments.
See Note 7 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements and "—Critical Accounting Estimates" for a discussion of estimates and assumptions related to
the reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses.
Reinsurance balances recoverable on reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses are reported separately as assets, instead of being netted with the related
liabilities, since reinsurance does not discharge us of our liability to policyholders. The method for determining reinsurance recoverables for unpaid losses and
loss adjustment expenses involves reviewing actuarial estimates of gross unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses to determine the Company's ability to
cede unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses under the Company's existing reinsurance contracts.
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements and "—Critical Accounting Estimates" for a discussion of reinsurance recoverables.
Debt
As of December 31, 2024, we had $125.0 million of 5.15% Series A Senior Notes outstanding. Principal payments are required annually beginning on July 22,
2030 in equal installments of $25.0 million through July 22, 2034, the maturity date. Interest accrues quarterly and is payable in arrears.
As of December 31, 2024, we had $50.0 million of the 6.21% Series B Senior Note outstanding. Principal payments are required annually beginning on July
22, 2030 in equal installments of $10.0 million through July 22, 2034, the maturity date. Interest accrues quarterly and is payable in arrears.
As of December 31, 2024, we had $11.0 million outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which has a maturity of July 22, 2027.
Interest on the outstanding amounts is based on 3-month Adjusted Term SOFR plus a margin of 1.625%. Interest accrues over the term of the interest rate and
is payable in arrears.
See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further details regarding our debt obligations.
Real estate construction costs
We are currently renovating an existing office building for our new corporate headquarters and have entered into an agreement under which we have incurred
obligations relating to the renovation. We expect the construction costs to be approximately $59.0 million and are currently targeting a fourth quarter 2025
completion date. At December 31, 2024 we incurred approximately $19.5 million of construction costs toward the project. Our contractual obligations include
payments which will become due under the construction agreement and project development.
Financial Condition
Stockholders' equity
At December 31, 2024, total stockholders' equity and tangible stockholders' equity were $1.5 billion, compared to total stockholders' equity and tangible equity
of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase in both total
53

Table of Contents
stockholders' equity and tangible stockholders' equity in 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily due to profits generated during the period and net activity
related to stock-based compensation plans. These increases were offset in part by dividends declared during 2024, share repurchases and an increase in
unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes. Tangible stockholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "—Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of stockholders' equity in accordance with GAAP to tangible stockholders' equity.
See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further details regarding our stock-based compensation plans.
Dividend declarations
On February 12, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock. This dividend was paid on March 13,
2024 to all stockholders of record on February 27, 2024.
On May 15, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock. This dividend was paid on June 13, 2024
to all stockholders of record on May 31, 2024.
On August 14, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock. This dividend was paid on
September 12, 2024 to all stockholders of record on August 29, 2024.
On November 13, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock. This dividend was paid on
December 13, 2024 to all stockholders of record on November 29, 2024.
On February 10, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.17 per share of common stock. This dividend is payable on March 13,
2025 to all stockholders of record on February 27, 2025.
Investment portfolio
At December 31, 2024, our cash and invested assets of $4.1 billion consisted of fixed-maturity securities, cash and cash equivalents, equity securities, short-
term investments and real estate investments. At December 31, 2024, the majority of the investment portfolio was comprised of fixed-maturity securities of
$3.5 billion that were classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses on those
securities, net of applicable taxes, reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2024, we also held $398.4
million of equity securities, which were comprised of common stocks, ETFs and non-redeemable preferred stock, $113.2 million of cash and cash equivalents,
$15.0 million of real estate investments and $3.7 million of short-term investments. Our fixed-maturity securities, including cash equivalents, had a weighted
average duration of 3.0 years and an average rating of "AA-" at December 31, 2024. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash equivalents and real estate
investments, had a gross investment return of 4.4% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 4.0% as of December 31, 2023.
54

Table of Contents
At December 31, 2024, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our fixed-maturity, equity, and short-term investments were as follows:
December 31, 2024
Amortized Cost
Estimated Fair Value
% of Total Fair Value
($ in thousands)
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
15,465 
$
15,048 
0.4 %
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
168,894 
146,304 
3.7 %
Corporate and other securities
2,037,372 
1,989,490 
50.5 %
Asset-backed securities
729,658 
732,742 
18.6 %
Residential mortgage-backed securities
502,121 
448,874 
11.4 %
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
209,521 
205,105 
5.2 %
Total fixed maturities
3,663,031 
3,537,563 
89.8 %
Equity securities:
Exchange traded funds
72,773 
129,731 
3.3 %
Nonredeemable preferred stock
27,938 
26,433 
0.7 %
Common stock
213,011 
242,195 
6.1 %
Total equity securities
313,722 
398,359 
10.1 %
Short-term investments
3,714 
3,714 
0.1 %
Total
$
3,980,467 
$
3,939,636 
100.0 %
The table below summarizes the credit quality of our fixed-maturity securities as of December 31, 2024, as rated by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC
("Standard & Poor's") or equivalent designation:
December 31, 2024
Standard & Poor’s or Equivalent Designation
Estimated Fair Value
% of Total
($ in thousands)
AAA
$
1,034,025 
29.2 %
AA
620,550 
17.5 %
A
1,166,923 
33.0 %
BBB
652,631 
18.5 %
Below BBB
63,434 
1.8 %
Total
$
3,537,563 
100.0 %
55

Table of Contents
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of our available-for-sale investments in fixed-maturity securities summarized by contractual maturity as of
December 31, 2024, were as follows:
December 31, 2024
Amortized
Cost
Estimated Fair Value
% of Fair Value
($ in thousands)
Due in one year or less
$
415,494 
$
415,674 
11.8 %
Due after one year through five years
1,070,687 
1,058,729 
29.9 %
Due after five years through ten years
513,549 
496,044 
14.0 %
Due after ten years
222,001 
180,395 
5.1 %
Asset-backed securities
729,658 
732,742 
20.7 %
Residential mortgage-backed securities
502,121 
448,874 
12.7 %
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
209,521 
205,105 
5.8 %
Total fixed maturities
$
3,663,031 
$
3,537,563 
100.0 %
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties, and the lenders may have the right to put the securities back to the borrower.
Restricted investments
In order to conduct business in certain states, we are required to maintain letters of credit or assets on deposit to support state-mandated insurance regulatory
requirements and to comply with certain third-party agreements. Assets held on deposit or in trust accounts are primarily in the form of cash or certain high-
grade securities. The fair value of our restricted assets was $3.7 million and $5.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
56

Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Reconciliation of underwriting income
Underwriting income is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is useful in evaluating our underwriting performance without regard to investment
income. Underwriting income is defined as net income excluding net investment income, the net change in the fair value of equity securities, net realized
investment gains and losses, change in allowance for credit losses on investments, interest expense, other expenses, other income and income tax expense. We
use underwriting income as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives us and users of our financial
information useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance. Underwriting income should not be viewed as a substitute
for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define underwriting income differently.
Net income for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 reconciles to underwriting income as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)
2024
2023
Net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
Income tax expense
99,873 
75,924 
Income before taxes
514,716 
384,017 
Net investment income
(150,287)
(102,335)
Change in the fair value of equity securities
(43,367)
(15,277)
Net realized investment gains
(6,831)
(6,040)
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments
(526)
187 
Interest expense
10,134 
10,301 
Other expenses 
3,968 
942 
Other income
(1,926)
(1,421)
Underwriting income
$
325,881 
$
270,374 
 Other expenses are corporate expenses not allocated to our insurance operations.
(1)
(1)
57

Table of Contents
Reconciliation of net operating earnings
Net operating earnings is defined as net income excluding the effects of the net change in the fair value of equity securities, after taxes, net realized investment
gains and losses, after taxes, and the change in allowance for credit losses on investments, after taxes. Management believes the exclusion of these items
provides a useful comparison of the Company's underlying business performance from period to period. Net operating earnings and percentages or calculations
using net operating earnings (e.g., operating return on equity) are non-GAAP financial measures. Net operating earnings should not be viewed as a substitute
for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define net operating earnings differently.
Net income for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 reconciles to net operating earnings as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)
2024
2023
Net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
Adjustments:
Change in the fair value of equity securities, before taxes
(43,367)
(15,277)
Income tax expense 
9,107 
3,208 
Change in the fair value of equity securities, after taxes
(34,260)
(12,069)
Net realized investment gains, before taxes
(6,831)
(6,040)
Income tax expense 
1,435 
1,268 
Net realized investment gains, after taxes
(5,396)
(4,772)
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments, before taxes
(526)
187 
Income tax expense (benefit) 
110 
(39)
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments, after taxes
(416)
148 
Net operating earnings
$
374,771 
$
291,400 
Operating return on equity:
Average equity 
$
1,285,197 
$
916,141 
Return on equity 
32.3 %
33.6 %
Operating return on equity 
29.2 %
31.8 %
Income taxes on adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating earnings use an effective tax rate of 21%.
Average equity is computed by adding the total stockholders' equity as of the date indicated to the prior year-end total and dividing by two.
Return on equity is net income expressed as a percentage of average beginning and ending stockholders’ equity during the period.
Operating return on equity is net operating earnings expressed as a percentage of average beginning and ending stockholders’ equity during the period.
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(4) 
58

Table of Contents
Reconciliation of tangible stockholders' equity
Tangible stockholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define tangible stockholders’ equity as stockholders’ equity less intangible assets, net of
deferred taxes. Our definition of tangible stockholders’ equity may not be comparable to that of other companies, and it should not be viewed as a substitute for
stockholders’ equity calculated in accordance with GAAP. We use tangible stockholders' equity internally to evaluate the strength of our balance sheet and to
compare returns relative to this measure.
Stockholders' equity at December 31, 2024 and 2023 reconciles to tangible stockholders' equity as follows:
December 31,
($ in thousands)
2024
2023
Stockholders' equity
$
1,483,561 
$
1,086,832 
Less: Intangible assets, net of deferred taxes
2,795 
2,795 
Tangible stockholders' equity
$
1,480,766 
$
1,084,037 
Critical Accounting Estimates
We identified the accounting estimates which are critical to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations. Critical accounting estimates
are defined as those estimates that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise significant
judgment. We use significant judgment concerning future results and developments in applying these critical accounting estimates and in preparing our
consolidated financial statements. These judgments and estimates affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of
our material contingent assets and liabilities, if any. Actual results may differ materially from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated
financial statements. We evaluate our estimates regularly using information that we believe to be relevant. For a detailed discussion of our accounting policies,
see the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
The reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses are the largest and most complex estimate in our consolidated balance sheet. The reserves for
unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represent our estimated ultimate cost of all unreported and reported but unpaid insured claims and the cost to adjust
these claims that have occurred as of or before the consolidated balance sheet date. We estimate the reserves using individual case-basis valuations of reported
claims and statistical analyses. The estimates are based on our historical data, industry data, and our analysis of future trends in loss severity, loss frequency,
and other factors such as inflation. We regularly review our estimates and adjust them as necessary as experience develops or as new information becomes
known to us. Such adjustments are included in current operations. Additionally, during the loss settlement period, it often becomes necessary to refine and
adjust the estimates of liability on a claim. Even after such adjustments, ultimate liability may be higher or lower than the revised estimates. Accordingly, the
ultimate settlement of losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly from the estimate included in our consolidated financial
statements.
We categorize our reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses into two types: case reserves and reserves for incurred but not reported losses
("IBNR"). Our gross reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses at December 31, 2024 were $2.3 billion, and of this amount, 90.4% related to IBNR. Our
reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance, at December 31, 2024 were $2.0 billion, and of this amount, 90.0% related to IBNR. A 5%
change in net IBNR reserves would equate to a $88.4 million change in the reserve for losses and
59

Table of Contents
loss adjustment expenses at such date, as well as a $69.8 million change in net income, a 4.7% change in both stockholders' equity and tangible stockholders'
equity, in each case at or for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The following tables summarize our reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, on a gross basis and net of reinsurance, at December 31, 2024 and
2023:
December 31, 2024
Gross
% of Total
Net
% of Total
($ in thousands)
Case reserves
$
220,243 
9.6 %
$
195,513 
10.0 %
IBNR
2,065,425 
90.4 %
1,767,095 
90.0 %
Total
$
2,285,668 
100.0 %
$
1,962,608 
100.0 %
December 31, 2023
Gross
% of Total
Net
% of Total
($ in thousands)
Case reserves
$
162,679 
9.6 %
$
137,581 
9.5 %
IBNR
1,530,196 
90.4 %
1,313,937 
90.5 %
Total
$
1,692,875 
100.0 %
$
1,451,518 
100.0 %
Case reserves are established for individual claims that have been reported to us. We are notified of losses by our insureds or their brokers. Based on the
information provided, we establish case reserves by estimating the ultimate losses from the claim, including defense costs associated with the ultimate
settlement of the claim. Our claims department personnel use their knowledge of the specific claim along with advice from internal and external experts,
including underwriters and legal counsel, to estimate the expected ultimate losses. During the life cycle of a particular claim, as more information becomes
available, we may revise our estimate of the ultimate value of the claim either upward or downward. The amount of the individual claim reserve is based on the
most recent information available.
Methodology
IBNR reserves are determined using actuarial methods to estimate losses that have occurred but have not yet been reported to us. We use several actuarial
methods to arrive at our IBNR reserve estimates for each line of business. These methods estimate the reserves based on a variety of information including
initial expected loss ratios, loss development patterns, paid losses, reported losses, claim counts and price indices. We use industry and peer-group data, in
addition to our own data, as a basis for selecting our loss development patterns.
We reserve for large catastrophes after an event has occurred. Shortly after an occurrence, we review insured locations exposed to the event, modeled losses for
our portfolio, and industry loss estimates for the event. We also consider frequency and severity from early claims reports to determine an appropriate reserve
for the catastrophe. These reserves are reviewed frequently to reflect actual reported losses and changes to our estimates are made to reflect the new
information.
Our Reserve Committee consists of our Chief Actuary and other select members of senior management. The Reserve Committee meets quarterly to review the
actuarial recommendations made by the Chief Actuary. In establishing the actuarial recommendation for the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses,
our actuary estimates an initial expected ultimate loss ratio for each line of business by accident year. Input from our underwriting and claims departments,
including premium pricing assumptions and historical experience, is considered by our actuary in estimating the initial expected loss ratios. During each
quarter, the Reserve Committee
60

Table of Contents
reviews the emergence of actual losses relative to expectations by line of business to assess whether the assumptions used in the reserving process continue to
form a reasonable basis for the projection of liabilities for those product lines. Our reserving methodology uses a loss reserving model that calculates a point
estimate for our ultimate losses. Although we believe that our assumptions and methodology are reasonable, our ultimate payments may vary, potentially
materially, from the estimates we have made.
In addition, we retain an independent actuary annually to review our estimate of reserves. The independent actuary is not involved in the establishment and
recording of our loss reserve. The actuarial consulting firm prepares its own estimate of unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, and we compare its estimate
to the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses reviewed and approved by the Reserve Committee to gain additional comfort on the adequacy of those
reserves.
While we believe that loss reserves at December 31, 2024 are adequate, new information, events, or circumstances may result in ultimate losses that are
materially greater or less than our estimates. As previously noted, there are many factors that may cause reserves to increase or decrease, particularly those
related to catastrophe losses and long-tailed lines of business.
Key assumptions
Expected loss ratios are a key assumption in estimates of ultimate losses for business at an early stage of development. A higher expected loss ratio results in a
higher ultimate loss estimate, and vice versa. Estimated loss development patterns are another significant assumption in estimating loss reserves. Accelerating a
loss development pattern results in lower ultimate losses, as the estimated proportion of losses already incurred would be higher. We utilize industry
benchmarks and peer group data to supplement our own data when estimating loss development patterns.
Each of the impacts described below is estimated individually, without consideration for any correlation among key indicators or among lines of business.
Therefore, it would be inappropriate to take each of the amounts described below and add them together to estimate volatility for our reserves in total. For any
one reserving line of business, the estimated variation in reserves due to changes in key indicators is a reasonable estimate of possible variation that may occur
in the future. The variation discussed is not meant to be a worst-case scenario and, therefore, it is possible that future variation may be greater than the amounts
shown below.
61

Table of Contents
The impact of reasonably likely changes in the two key assumptions used to estimate net loss reserves at December 31, 2024 is as follows:
Development Pattern
Expected Loss Ratio
Property
10% lower
Unchanged
10% higher
($ in millions)
2 months slower
$
21.0 
$
38.4 
$
55.9 
Unchanged
(12.5)
— 
12.5 
2 months faster
(30.8)
(21.1)
(11.3)
Casualty Occurrence
5% lower
Unchanged
5% higher
6 months slower
$
35.5 
$
136.4 
$
237.3 
Unchanged
(91.6)
— 
91.6 
6 months faster
(221.7)
(139.5)
(57.3)
Casualty Claims-Made
5% lower
Unchanged
5% higher
6 months slower
$
29.7 
$
59.3 
$
88.9 
Unchanged
(24.2)
— 
24.2 
6 months faster
(71.3)
(51.8)
(32.2)
Reserve development
The amount by which estimated losses differ from those originally reported for a period is known as "development." Development is unfavorable when the
losses ultimately settle for more than the amount reserved or subsequent estimates indicate a basis for reserve increases on unresolved claims. Development is
favorable when losses ultimately settle for less than the amount reserved or subsequent estimates indicate a basis for reducing loss reserves on unresolved
claims. We reflect favorable or unfavorable development of loss reserves in the results of operations in the period the estimates are changed. Refer to Note 7 to
the consolidated financial statements for discussion on our reserve development for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Fair value measurements
Like other accounting estimates, fair value measurements may be based on subjective information and generally involve uncertainty and judgment. Fair value
is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not acting under duress.
Fair value hierarchy disclosures are based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. The three levels of
the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
Level 2 - Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets
or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs.
62

Table of Contents
Level 3 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset or liability and are significant to the fair value measurement.
When the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Thus, a Level 3 fair value measurement may include inputs that
are observable (Level 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). The use of valuation methodologies may require a significant amount of judgment. During periods
of financial market disruption, including periods of rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of our securities if trading
becomes less frequent or market data becomes less observable. We review the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the
observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification for certain financial assets and liabilities.
Fair values of financial instruments in our investment portfolio are estimated using unadjusted prices obtained by our investment accounting vendor from
nationally recognized third-party pricing services, where available. For securities where we are unable to obtain fair values from a pricing service or broker, fair
values are estimated using information obtained from our investment accounting vendor. We perform several procedures to ascertain the reasonableness of
investment values included in the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2024, including (1) obtaining and reviewing the internal control report
from our investment accounting vendor that obtains fair values from third party pricing services, (2) discussing with our investment accounting vendor its
process for reviewing and validating pricing obtained from outside pricing services and (3) reviewing the security pricing received from our investment
accounting vendor and monitoring changes in unrealized gains and losses at the individual security level.
Investment securities are subject to fluctuations in fair value due to changes in issuer-specific circumstances, such as credit rating, and changes in industry-
specific circumstances, such as movements in credit spreads based on the market’s perception of industry risks. In addition, fixed maturities are subject to
fluctuations in fair value due to changes in interest rates. As a result of these potential fluctuations, it is possible to have significant unrealized gains or losses
on a security.
Reinsurance
We enter into reinsurance contracts to limit our exposure to potential large losses. Reinsurance refers to an arrangement in which a company called a reinsurer
agrees in a contract (often referred to as a treaty) to assume specified risks written by an insurance company (known as a ceding company) by paying the
insurance company all or a portion of the insurance company's losses arising under specified classes of insurance policies in return for a share in premiums.
Reinsurance recoverables recorded on insurance losses ceded under reinsurance contracts are subject to judgments and uncertainties similar to those involved
in estimating gross loss reserves. In addition to these uncertainties, our reinsurance recoverables may prove uncollectible if the reinsurers are unable or
unwilling to perform under the reinsurance contracts. In establishing our reinsurance allowance for credit losses, we evaluate the financial condition of our
reinsurers and monitor concentration of credit risk arising from our exposure to individual reinsurers. To determine if an allowance is necessary, we consider,
among other factors, published financial information, reports from rating agencies, payment history, collateral held and our legal right to offset balances
recoverable against balances we may owe. Our reinsurance allowance for credit losses is subject to uncertainty and volatility due to the time lag involved in
collecting amounts recoverable from reinsurers. Over the period of time that losses occur, reinsurers are billed and amounts are ultimately collected, economic
conditions, as well as the operational and financial performance of particular reinsurers may change and these changes may affect the reinsurers’ willingness
and ability to meet their contractual obligations to us. It is difficult to fully evaluate the impact of major catastrophic events on the financial stability of
reinsurers, as well as the access to capital that reinsurers may have when such
63

Table of Contents
events occur. The ceding of insurance does not legally discharge us from our primary liability for the full amount of the policies, and we will be required to pay
the loss and bear the collection risk if any reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the reinsurance contracts. We target reinsurers with A.M. Best financial
strength ratings of "A-" (Excellent) or better. Based on our evaluation of the factors discussed above, the allowance for credit losses related to reinsurance
balances was $0.9 million at December 31, 2024.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 – "Summary of significant accounting policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
64

Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of economic losses due to adverse changes in the estimated fair value of a financial instrument as the result of changes in interest rates,
equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The primary components of market risk affecting us are credit risk, interest rate risk, and
equity rate risk. We do not have significant exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity risk.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the potential loss resulting from adverse changes in an issuer's ability to repay its debt obligations. We have exposure to credit risk as a holder of
fixed-maturity investments. Our risk management strategy and investment policy are designed to primarily invest in debt instruments of high credit quality
issuers and to limit the amount of credit exposure with respect to particular ratings categories and any one issuer. At December 31, 2024, our fixed-maturity
portfolio, including cash equivalents, had an average rating of "AA-." Additionally, at December 31, 2024, approximately 79.8% of our fixed-maturity
portfolio, excluding cash equivalents, was rated "A-" or better by at least one nationally recognized rating organization. Our policy is to invest in investment
grade securities and to minimize investments in fixed maturities that are unrated or rated below investment grade. At December 31, 2024, approximately 1.8%
of our fixed-maturity portfolio, excluding cash equivalents, was unrated or rated below investment grade. We monitor the financial condition of all of the
issuers of fixed-maturity securities in our portfolio.
In addition, we are subject to credit risk with respect to our third-party reinsurers. Although our third-party reinsurers are obligated to reimburse us to the extent
we cede risk to them, we are ultimately liable to our policyholders on all risks we have ceded. As a result, reinsurance contracts do not limit our ultimate
obligations to pay claims covered under the insurance policies we issue and we might not collect amounts recoverable from our reinsurers. We address this
credit risk by selecting reinsurers that have an A.M. Best rating of "A-" (Excellent) or better at the time we enter into the agreement and by performing, along
with our reinsurance broker, periodic credit reviews of our reinsurers. If one of our reinsurers suffers a credit downgrade, we may consider various options to
lessen the risk of asset impairment, including commutation, novation and letters of credit.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in interest rates. The primary market risk to the investment portfolio is
interest rate risk associated with investments in fixed-maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock. Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct effect
on the market valuation of these securities. When market interest rates rise, the fair value of our fixed-maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock
decreases. Conversely, as interest rates fall, the fair value of our fixed-maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock increases. We manage this
interest rate risk by investing in securities with varied maturity dates and by managing the duration of our investment portfolio to the duration of our reserves.
Expressed in years, duration is the weighted average payment period of cash flows, where the weighting is based on the present value of the cash flows. We set
duration targets for our fixed-maturity investment portfolios after consideration of the estimated duration of our liabilities and other factors. The effective
weighted-average duration of the portfolio, including cash equivalents, was 3.0 years as of December 31, 2024.
65

Table of Contents
We had fixed-maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock with a fair value of $3.6 billion at December 31, 2024 and $2.7 billion at December 31,
2023 that were subject to interest rate risk. The table below illustrates the sensitivity of the fair value of our fixed-maturity securities and non-redeemable
preferred stock to selected hypothetical changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Estimated Fair
Value
Estimated
Change in Fair
Value
Estimated %
Increase (Decrease)
in Fair Value
Estimated Fair
Value
Estimated
Change in Fair
Value
Estimated %
Increase (Decrease)
in Fair Value
($ in thousands)
200 basis points increase
$
3,359,066 
$
(204,930)
(5.8)%
$
2,596,163 
$
(148,769)
(5.4)%
100 basis points increase
$
3,458,502 
$
(105,494)
(3.0)%
$
2,668,387 
$
(76,545)
(2.8)%
No change
$
3,563,996 
$
— 
— %
$
2,744,932 
$
— 
— %
100 basis points decrease
$
3,674,836 
$
110,840 
3.1 %
$
2,824,874 
$
79,942 
2.9 %
200 basis points decrease
$
3,789,241 
$
225,245 
6.3 %
$
2,907,181 
$
162,249 
5.9 %
Changes in interest rates will have an immediate effect on comprehensive income and stockholders’ equity but will not ordinarily have an immediate effect on
net income. Actual results may differ from the hypothetical change in market rates assumed in this disclosure. This sensitivity analysis does not reflect the
results of any action that we may take to mitigate such hypothetical losses in fair value.
Equity risk
Equity risk represents the potential economic losses due to adverse changes in equity security prices. A portion of our portfolio is invested in ETF securities and
common stock, which have historically produced higher long-term returns relative to fixed-maturity investments. As of December 31, 2024, approximately
9.2% of the fair value of our investment portfolio (including cash and cash equivalents) was invested in common stocks and ETFs. We manage equity price risk
of our equity portfolio primarily through asset allocation techniques.
66

Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
68
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
68
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023
72
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
73
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
74
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
75
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
76
Schedule I - Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties
107
Schedule II - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant - Parent Company Only
108
Schedule V - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
113
Schedules other than those listed are omitted for the reason that they are not required, are not applicable or that equivalent information has been included in the
financial statements or notes thereto or elsewhere herein.
67

Table of Contents
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Management does not expect that its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Internal control over financial
reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud,
if any, have been detected. The design of any system of internal control over financial reporting also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management reviewed the results
of its assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that we maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.
KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting, as stated in their report which is included herein.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on
criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria
established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated
balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement
schedules I, II, and V (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
68

Table of Contents
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Richmond, Virginia
February 21, 2025
69

Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and
2023, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement schedules I, II, and V (collectively, the consolidated financial
statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December
31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated
or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements
and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our
opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate
opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
As described in Notes 1 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
(reserves), which represent the Company’s best estimate of ultimate unpaid cost of all reported and unreported losses and loss adjustment expenses
incurred prior to the financial statement date. This estimate is based on various actuarial methods. These methods utilize numerous inputs including initial
expected loss ratios, expected development patterns for losses based on historical Company and industry data, actual reported losses and loss adjustment
expenses, claim counts and price indices. All estimates are regularly reviewed and, as experience develops and new information becomes known, the
reserves are adjusted as necessary. As of December 31, 2024, the Company recorded $2,286 million of reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses.
We identified the evaluation of the estimation of reserves as a critical audit matter. The evaluation of the Company’s best estimate of reserves required
complex auditor judgment due to the inherent uncertainty in the ultimate amount and timing of claim payments and required specialized actuarial skills
and knowledge. In addition, the evaluation of
70

Table of Contents
the ultimate expected loss assumptions required subjective auditor judgment due to the Company’s limited historical claims data and, therefore, also
involved consideration of industry data.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness
of certain internal controls related to the Company’s reserving process. These included internal controls over the actuarial methods and certain assumptions
used to derive the Company’s best estimate of reserves and the comparison of the Company’s best estimate to the annual independent actuarial reserve
estimate performed by an external consulting actuary. We also involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
• comparing the actuarial methodology the Company used to determine the reserves to generally accepted actuarial standards and practices
• performing independent estimates of reserves for each line of business, using a combination of the Company’s underlying historical claims data and
industry data
• developing an independent range of reserves using both the Company’s underlying historical claims data and industry data with respect to future claim
reporting amounts and payment patterns and prior year independent selected loss rates
• assessing the position of the Company’s recorded reserves within this independent range in the current year and comparing to its relative position in the
prior year.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.
Richmond, Virginia
February 21, 2025
71

Table of Contents
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Assets
Fixed-maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost: $3,663,031 allowance for credit loss:
$27 – 2024; $2,834,463 and $553 – 2023)
$
3,537,563 
$
2,711,759 
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: $313,722 – 2024; $193,543 – 2023)
398,359 
234,813 
Real estate investments, net
15,045 
14,791 
Short-term investments
3,714 
5,589 
Total investments
3,954,681 
2,966,952 
Cash and cash equivalents
113,213 
126,694 
Investment income due and accrued
27,366 
21,689 
Premiums and fees receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $26,926 in 2024 and $13,383 in 2023
140,027 
143,212 
Reinsurance recoverables, net of allowance for credit losses of $932 in 2024 and $744 in 2023
337,891 
247,836 
Ceded unearned premiums
52,736 
52,516 
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net of ceding commissions
109,263 
88,395 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
3,538 
3,538 
Deferred income tax asset, net
60,215 
55,699 
Other assets
87,774 
66,443 
Total assets
$
4,886,704 
$
3,772,974 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
$
2,285,668 
$
1,692,875 
Unearned premiums
828,449 
701,351 
Payable to reinsurers
43,959 
47,582 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
55,159 
44,922 
Debt
184,122 
183,846 
Other liabilities
5,786 
15,566 
Total liabilities
3,403,143 
2,686,142 
Contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, 23,294,783 shares issued and 23,272,157
shares outstanding at December 31, 2024; 23,181,919 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023
233 
232 
Additional paid-in capital
361,398 
352,970 
Retained earnings
1,229,136 
828,247 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(97,206)
(94,617)
Treasury stock, at cost (22,626 shares in 2024; — in 2023)
(10,000)
— 
Stockholders’ equity
1,483,561 
1,086,832 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
4,886,704 
$
3,772,974 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
72

Table of Contents
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Gross written premiums
$
1,870,341 
$
1,568,815 
$
1,102,092 
Ceded written premiums
(392,993)
(304,185)
(165,282)
Net written premiums
1,477,348 
1,264,630 
936,810 
Change in unearned premiums
(126,878)
(192,093)
(142,691)
Net earned premiums
1,350,470 
1,072,537 
794,119 
Fee income
34,118 
27,026 
19,604 
Net investment income
150,287 
102,335 
51,282 
Change in fair value of equity securities
43,367 
15,277 
(27,723)
Net realized investment gains
6,831 
6,040 
1,191 
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments
526 
(187)
(366)
Other income
1,926 
1,421 
697 
Total revenues
1,587,525 
1,224,449 
838,804 
Expenses:
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
772,899 
600,219 
457,913 
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses
285,808 
228,970 
180,322 
Interest expense
10,134 
10,301 
4,284 
Other expenses
3,968 
942 
721 
Total expenses
1,072,809 
840,432 
643,240 
Income before income taxes
514,716 
384,017 
195,564 
Income tax expense
99,873 
75,924 
36,450 
Net income
414,843 
308,093 
159,114 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes
(2,589)
40,301 
(153,043)
Total comprehensive income
$
412,254 
$
348,394 
$
6,071 
Earnings per share:
Basic
$
17.92 
$
13.37 
$
6.97 
Diluted
$
17.78 
$
13.22 
$
6.88 
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic
23,153 
23,045 
22,815 
Diluted
23,332 
23,307 
23,125 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
73

Table of Contents
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Shares of
Common Stock
Outstanding
Common Stock
Additional Paid-
in Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumu-
lated
 Other
Compre-
hensive (Loss)
Income
Treasury
Stock, at Cost
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
(in thousands, except for share and per share data)
Balance at December 31, 2021
22,834,377 
$
228 
$
295,040 
$
385,942 
$
18,125 
$
— 
$
699,335 
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance
costs
155,000 
2 
47,496 
— 
— 
— 
47,498 
Issuance of common stock under stock-based
compensation plan
116,140 
1 
1,089 
— 
— 
— 
1,090 
Stock-based compensation expense
— 
— 
6,678 
— 
— 
— 
6,678 
Restricted shares withheld for taxes
(14,991)
— 
(3,288)
— 
— 
— 
(3,288)
Dividends declared ($0.52 per share)
— 
— 
— 
(11,935)
— 
— 
(11,935)
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
— 
— 
— 
— 
(153,043)
— 
(153,043)
Net income
— 
— 
— 
159,114 
— 
— 
159,114 
Balance at December 31, 2022
23,090,526 
231 
347,015 
533,121 
(134,918)
— 
745,449 
Issuance of common stock under stock-based
compensation plan
104,949 
1 
876 
— 
— 
— 
877 
Stock-based compensation expense
— 
— 
9,361 
— 
— 
— 
9,361 
Restricted shares withheld for taxes
(13,556)
— 
(4,282)
— 
— 
— 
(4,282)
Dividends declared ($0.56 per share)
— 
— 
— 
(12,967)
— 
— 
(12,967)
Other comprehensive income, net of income
taxes
— 
— 
— 
— 
40,301 
— 
40,301 
Net income
— 
— 
— 
308,093 
— 
— 
308,093 
Balance at December 31, 2023
23,181,919 
232 
352,970 
828,247 
(94,617)
— 
1,086,832 
Issuance of common stock under stock-based
compensation plan
127,265 
1 
1,329 
— 
— 
— 
1,330 
Stock-based compensation expense
— 
— 
14,146 
— 
— 
— 
14,146 
Restricted shares withheld for taxes
(14,401)
— 
(7,047)
— 
— 
— 
(7,047)
Dividends declared ($0.60 per share)
— 
— 
— 
(13,954)
— 
— 
(13,954)
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
— 
— 
— 
— 
(2,589)
— 
(2,589)
Net income
— 
— 
— 
414,843 
— 
— 
414,843 
Treasury stock acquired — share repurchases
(22,626)
— 
— 
— 
— 
(10,000)
(10,000)
Balance at December 31, 2024
23,272,157 
$
233 
$
361,398 
$
1,229,136 
$
(97,206)
$
(10,000)
$
1,483,561 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
74

Table of Contents
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Operating activities:
Net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
$
159,114 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Change in fair value of equity securities
(43,367)
(15,277)
27,723 
Net realized investment gains
(6,831)
(6,040)
(1,191)
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments
(526)
187 
366 
Deferred tax benefit
(3,828)
(9,429)
(14,191)
Depreciation and amortization
5,802 
3,274 
2,721 
Stock compensation expense
14,146 
9,361 
6,678 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Investment income due and accrued
(5,677)
(7,238)
(6,793)
Premiums receivable, net
3,185 
(37,458)
(34,750)
Reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses
592,793 
454,473 
357,058 
Unearned premiums
127,098 
201,674 
151,947 
Reinsurance balances, net
(93,898)
(21,405)
(90,828)
Deferred policy acquisition costs
(20,868)
(26,801)
(19,626)
Income taxes payable (recoverable)
(359)
742 
7,518 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
8,936 
12,519 
8,111 
Other
(15,148)
(6,840)
3,958 
Net cash provided by operating activities
976,301 
859,835 
557,815 
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment
(23,943)
(6,607)
(6,901)
Purchase of real estate investment
(312)
(2,116)
(76,623)
Sale of real estate investment
— 
62,036 
— 
Change in short-term investments, net
2,056 
36,706 
(40,638)
Purchases – fixed-maturity securities
(1,557,541)
(1,317,048)
(751,402)
Purchases – equity securities
(156,477)
(86,605)
(11,506)
Sales – fixed-maturity securities
289,360 
245,618 
63,092 
Sales – equity securities
34,380 
30,623 
4,990 
Maturities and calls – fixed-maturity securities
452,352 
176,501 
110,415 
Net cash used in investing activities
(960,125)
(860,892)
(708,573)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
— 
— 
47,498 
Proceeds from borrowings under credit facility
— 
— 
73,000 
Proceeds from notes payable
— 
50,000 
125,000 
Repayment of credit facility
— 
(62,000)
(43,000)
Debt issuance costs
— 
(164)
(2,381)
Payroll taxes withheld and remitted on share-based payments
(7,047)
(4,282)
(3,288)
Common stock issued, stock options exercised
1,330 
877 
1,090 
Dividends paid
(13,940)
(12,954)
(11,927)
Treasury stock acquired — share repurchases
(10,000)
— 
— 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(29,657)
(28,523)
185,992 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(13,481)
(29,580)
35,234 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
126,694 
156,274 
121,040 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
113,213 
$
126,694 
$
156,274 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
75

Table of Contents
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial statements
Description of business
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc., an insurance holding company, is a Delaware corporation that was formed in 2009 and conducts its operations through its wholly-
owned subsidiaries (referred to as "Kinsale" or, with its subsidiaries, the "Company"). Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. writes excess and surplus lines insurance on
a non-admitted basis principally through its insurance subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance Company ("Kinsale Insurance"), which is authorized to write business in
50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. also markets certain products
through its subsidiary, Aspera Insurance Services, Inc. ("Aspera"), an insurance broker.
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
Principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
year's presentation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any, at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Management periodically reviews its estimates and assumptions. These reviews include evaluating the adequacy of reserves for unpaid losses and
loss adjustment expenses, allowance for credit losses and uncollectible reinsurance, fair value of investments, as well as evaluating the investment portfolio for
credit impairments.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Short-term investments
Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Short-term investments have maturities greater than three months but less
than one year at the date of purchase.
Fixed-maturity and equity securities
Fixed-maturity securities are classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are excluded from
earnings but are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income and stockholders' equity, net of deferred income taxes.
Equity securities are reported at fair value. Changes in unrealized gains and losses in fair value of these investments are recognized in net income.
The Company regularly reviews all its available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses to assess whether the decline in the fair value is deemed to be a
credit loss. See Note 2 for further discussion regarding the determination of credit losses.
Interest on fixed-maturity securities is credited to earnings as it accrues. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted using the effective interest method
over the lives of the related fixed maturities, or to the earliest call date for
76

Table of Contents
securities purchased at a premium. This method includes an adjustment for estimated principal prepayments, if any, on asset- and mortgage-backed securities.
To the extent that the estimated lives of such securities change as a result of changes in estimated prepayment rates, the adjustments are included in net
investment income using the retrospective method.
Dividends on equity securities are included in earnings on the ex-dividend date.
Realized gains and losses on disposition of investments are based on specific identification of the investments sold on the trade date.
Real estate investments
Real estate investments include real estate and the related assets purchased for investment purposes. Real estate and the related depreciable assets are carried at
cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets and is included in net
investment income. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective lease and is included in net investment income. Land is
not depreciated. Real estate is evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of the real estate may not be recoverable.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance premiums, commissions, and ceded unearned premiums on reinsured business are accounted for on a basis consistent with that used in accounting
for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. The Company receives ceding commissions in accordance with certain reinsurance
treaties. The ceding commissions are capitalized and amortized as a reduction of underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses.
Reinsurance recoverables represent paid losses and loss adjustment expenses and reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses ceded to reinsurers
that are subject to reimbursement under reinsurance treaties. The method for determining reinsurance recoverables for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses involves reviewing actuarial estimates of gross unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses to determine the Company's ability to cede unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses under the Company's existing reinsurance contracts. This method is continually reviewed and updated and any resulting
adjustments are reflected in earnings in the period identified. See Note 8 for a further discussion of the Company's reinsurance program.
Premiums receivable, net
Premiums receivable balances are carried at face value, net of any allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses represents an estimate of
amounts considered uncollectible based on the Company’s assessment of the collectability of receivables that are past due. The estimate considers historical
loss data, current and future economic conditions and specific identification of collectability concerns where applicable. The following table presents the
rollforward of the allowance for credit losses for premiums receivable for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
13,383 
$
8,067 
Current period change for estimated uncollectible premiums
17,397 
9,790 
Write-offs of uncollectible premiums receivable
(3,854)
(4,474)
Ending balance
$
26,926 
$
13,383 
77

Table of Contents
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net of ceding commissions
The Company defers commissions, net of ceding commissions, and certain other costs that are directly related to the successful acquisition of insurance
contracts. All eligible costs are capitalized and charged to expense in proportion to premium earned over the estimated policy life. To the extent that unearned
premiums on existing policies are not adequate to cover the related costs and expenses, referred to as a premium deficiency, deferred policy acquisition costs
are charged to earnings. The Company considers anticipated investment income in determining whether a premium deficiency exists.
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives range from 39 years for the building and parking deck, 15 to 20 years for land
improvements, 7 to 10 years for furniture and equipment, and 3 to 7 years for electronic data processing hardware and software.
Property and equipment are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consists of the following:
December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands)
Building
$
37,190 
$
37,181 
Parking deck
5,072 
5,072 
Land
3,068 
3,068 
Equipment
4,401 
3,958 
Software
20,203 
15,375 
Furniture and fixtures
3,200 
3,065 
Leasehold improvements
153 
153 
Land improvements
474 
474 
Construction in progress - building
26,530 
6,623 
100,291 
74,969 
Accumulated depreciation
(17,367)
(11,565)
Total property and equipment, net
$
82,924 
$
63,404 
Construction in progress includes capitalized expenses related to the development of the new corporate headquarters' building. Construction is expected to be
completed in the fourth quarter of 2025.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The Company's indefinite-lived intangible assets are comprised solely of
regulatory approvals granted by the various state insurance departments to write insurance business in the respective states on a non-admitted basis. In
accordance with U.S. GAAP, amortization of indefinite-lived intangible assets is not permitted. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment
during the fourth quarter on an annual basis, or earlier if there is reason to suspect that their values may have been diminished or impaired. There were no
impairments recognized in December 31, 2024, 2023, or 2022. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, no triggering events occurred that suggested an updated
review was necessary.
Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represent management's best estimate of ultimate unpaid cost of all reported and unreported losses and
loss adjustment expenses incurred prior to the financial statement date. The estimates are based on several actuarial methods that use a variety of inputs
including initial expected loss ratios, loss development patterns, paid losses, reported losses, claim counts and price indices. All estimates are regularly
reviewed and, as experience develops and new information becomes known, the reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses are adjusted as
necessary. Such adjustments are reflected in the results of operations in the period in which they
78

Table of Contents
are determined. Although management believes that the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses are reasonable, due to the inherent uncertainty in
estimating reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, it is possible that the Company’s actual incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses will
not develop in a manner consistent with the assumptions inherent in the determination of these reserves. If actual liabilities exceed recorded amounts, there will
be an increase to the Company’s reserves resulting in a reduction in net income and stockholders’ equity in the period in which the deficiency is identified.
Furthermore, management may determine that recorded reserves are more than adequate to cover expected losses which will result in a reduction to the
reserves. The Company believes that the reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses at December 31, 2024 and 2023 are adequate and represent a
reasonable estimate of the Company's future obligations. See Note 7 for a further discussion of reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses.
Revenue recognition
Premiums are recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the insurance contracts, net of ceded reinsurance. Unearned premiums are calculated on a daily
pro rata basis. Fee income is recognized as revenue when the related premium is written.
Income taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the recorded amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities,
using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect during the year in which the basis differences reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period in which such change was enacted. Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets are estimated based on the Company's
assessment of the realizability of such amounts. Valuation allowances are recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax
assets will not be realizable.
The Company provides for uncertain tax positions, and the related interest and penalties, based upon management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more
likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. To the extent that the anticipated tax outcome of these uncertain tax positions changes, such
changes in estimate will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made. The Company recognizes accrued interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
The Company uses the portfolio approach to release stranded tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") related to its available-for-sale
fixed-maturity securities. Under this approach, stranded tax effects remaining in AOCI are released only when the entire portfolio of the available-for-sale
fixed-maturity securities are liquidated, sold or extinguished.
Contingencies
Liabilities for loss contingencies, arising from noninsurance policy claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and penalties and other sources, are recorded when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred in
connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
Fair value of financial instruments
Fair value is estimated for each class of financial instrument based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. This guidance requires
an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value hierarchy disclosures are
based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
See Note 3 for further details regarding fair value disclosures.
79

Table of Contents
Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation is expensed based upon the estimated fair value of employee stock awards. Compensation cost for awards of equity instruments to
employees is measured based on the grant-date fair value of those awards and compensation expense is recognized over the service period that the awards vest.
Forfeitures of stock-based compensation awards are recognized as they occur. See Note 9 for further discussion and related disclosures regarding stock-based
compensation.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-07, Segment Reporting - Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2023-07, "Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable
Segment Disclosures," which expands reportable segment disclosure requirements by requiring disclosures of significant reportable segment expenses that are
regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") and included within each reported measure of a segment's profit or loss. The ASU also
requires disclosure of the title and position of the individual identified as the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measures of a
segment's profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Additionally, ASU 2023-07 requires all segment profit or
loss and assets disclosures to be provided on an annual and interim basis. ASU 2023-07 became effective for the Company for the year ended December 31,
2024 and will be effective for interim periods beginning in 2025. Refer to Note 15 for the Company's segment reporting disclosures.
Prospective accounting pronouncements
ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-
40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses," requiring public entities to disclose additional information about specific expense categories in the notes
to the financial statements on an interim and annual basis. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the guidance will have on its disclosures.
2.     Investments
Available-for-sale investments
The following tables summarize the Company’s available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2024 and 2023:
December 31, 2024
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Gross Unrealized
Losses
Allowance for
Credit Losses
Estimated Fair
Value
(in thousands)
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government agencies
$
15,465 
$
— 
$
(417)
$
— 
$
15,048 
Obligations of states, municipalities and political
subdivisions
168,894 
46 
(22,633)
(3)
146,304 
Corporate and other securities
2,037,372 
5,779 
(53,638)
(23)
1,989,490 
Asset-backed securities
729,658 
4,606 
(1,522)
— 
732,742 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
502,121 
747 
(53,994)
— 
448,874 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
209,521 
423 
(4,838)
(1)
205,105 
Total fixed-maturity investments
$
3,663,031 
$
11,601 
$
(137,042)
$
(27)
$
3,537,563 
80

Table of Contents
December 31, 2023
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Gross Unrealized
Losses
Allowance for
Credit Losses
Estimated Fair
Value
(in thousands)
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government agencies
$
28,003 
$
57 
$
(806)
$
— 
$
27,254 
Obligations of states, municipalities and political
subdivisions
191,080 
212 
(20,248)
— 
171,044 
Corporate and other securities
1,437,468 
5,532 
(54,755)
(552)
1,387,693 
Asset-backed securities
641,700 
2,833 
(2,773)
— 
641,760 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
463,904 
1,732 
(48,530)
— 
417,106 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
72,308 
11 
(5,416)
(1)
66,902 
Total fixed-maturity investments
$
2,834,463 
$
10,377 
$
(132,528)
$
(553)
$
2,711,759 
Available-for-sale investments in a loss position
The Company regularly reviews all its available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses to assess whether the decline in the fair value is deemed to be a
credit loss. The Company considers a number of factors in completing its review of credit losses, including the extent to which a security's fair value has been
below cost and the financial condition of an issuer. In addition to specific issuer information, the Company also evaluates the current market and interest rate
environment. Generally, a change in a security’s value caused by a change in the market or interest rate environment does not constitute a credit loss.
For fixed-maturity securities, the Company also considers whether it intends to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the
security before recovery and the ability to recover all amounts outstanding when contractually due. When assessing whether it intends to sell a fixed-maturity
security or if it is likely to be required to sell a fixed-maturity security before recovery of its amortized cost, the Company evaluates facts and circumstances
including, but not limited to, decisions to reposition the investment portfolio, potential sales of investments to meet cash flow needs and potential sales of
investments to capitalize on favorable pricing.
For fixed-maturity securities where a decline in fair value is below the amortized cost basis and the Company intends to sell the security, or it is more likely
than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost, an impairment is recognized in net income based on the
fair value of the security at the time of assessment. For fixed-maturity securities that the Company does not intend to sell or for which it is more likely than not
that the Company would not be required to sell before recovery of its amortized cost, the Company compares the estimated present value of the cash flows
expected to be collected to the amortized cost of the security. Inputs into the present value cash flow analysis include default rates and recoverability rates
based on credit rating. The extent to which the estimated present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the security
represents the credit-related portion of the impairment, which is recognized in net income through an allowance for credit losses. Any remaining decline in fair
value represents the noncredit portion of the impairment, which is recognized in other comprehensive income.
The Company reports investment income due and accrued separately from fixed-maturity securities, available for sale, and has elected not to measure an
allowance for credit losses for investment income due and accrued. Investment income due and accrued is written off through earnings at the time the issuer of
the bond defaults or is expected to default on payments.
81

Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2024, the Company's credit loss review resulted in an allowance for credit losses on four securities. The following table presents changes
in the allowance for expected credit losses on available-for-sale securities:
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
553 
$
366 
Increase to allowance from securities for which credit losses were not previously recorded
3 
1 
Reduction from securities sold during the period
(479)
(12)
Net (decrease) increase from securities that had an allowance at the beginning of the period
(50)
198 
Ending balance
$
27 
$
553 
The following tables summarize gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value for available-for-sale investments by length of time that the securities have
continuously been in an unrealized loss position:
December 31, 2024
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Estimated Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(in thousands)
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government agencies
$
838 
$
(13)
$
14,210 
$
(404)
$
15,048 
$
(417)
Obligations of states, municipalities and
political subdivisions
27,049 
(417)
114,620 
(22,216)
141,669 
(22,633)
Corporate and other securities
667,645 
(9,139)
493,598 
(44,499)
1,161,243 
(53,638)
Asset-backed securities
121,371 
(943)
24,656 
(579)
146,027 
(1,522)
Residential mortgage-backed securities
144,955 
(1,934)
237,514 
(52,060)
382,469 
(53,994)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
92,024 
(960)
53,812 
(3,878)
145,836 
(4,838)
Total fixed-maturity investments
$
1,053,882 
$
(13,406)
$
938,410 
$
(123,636)
$
1,992,292 
$
(137,042)
At December 31, 2024, in addition to the securities included in the allowance for credit losses, the Company held 1,031 fixed-maturity securities with a total
estimated fair value of $2.0 billion and gross unrealized losses of $137.0 million. Of those securities, 616 were in a continuous unrealized loss position for
greater than one year. As discussed above, the Company regularly reviews all fixed-maturity securities within its investment portfolio to determine whether a
credit loss has occurred. Based on the Company's review as of December 31, 2024, except for securities previously discussed, the securities in unrealized loss
positions were caused by interest rate changes or other market factors and were not credit-specific issues, nor did the Company intend to sell these securities.
At December 31, 2024, 79.8% of the Company’s fixed-maturity securities were rated "A-" or better and all of Company's fixed-maturity securities made
expected coupon payments under the contractual terms of the securities.
82

Table of Contents
December 31, 2023
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Estimated Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding Losses
Estimated Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding Losses
Estimated Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding Losses
(in thousands)
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government agencies
$
— 
$
— 
$
15,484 
$
(806)
$
15,484 
$
(806)
Obligations of states, municipalities and
political subdivisions
20,886 
(221)
121,911 
(20,027)
142,797 
(20,248)
Corporate and other securities
246,355 
(1,444)
651,525 
(53,311)
897,880 
(54,755)
Asset-backed securities
142,287 
(872)
217,401 
(1,901)
359,688 
(2,773)
Residential mortgage-backed securities
26,158 
(49)
268,891 
(48,481)
295,049 
(48,530)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
8,775 
(55)
56,731 
(5,361)
65,506 
(5,416)
Total fixed-maturity investments
$
444,461 
$
(2,641)
$
1,331,943 
$
(129,887)
$
1,776,404 
$
(132,528)
Contractual maturities of available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities at December 31, 2024 are summarized, by contractual maturity, as
follows:
Amortized
Estimated
Cost
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Due in one year or less
$
415,494 
$
415,674 
Due after one year through five years
1,070,687 
1,058,729 
Due after five years through ten years
513,549 
496,044 
Due after ten years
222,001 
180,395 
Asset-backed securities
729,658 
732,742 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
502,121 
448,874 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
209,521 
205,105 
Total fixed maturities
$
3,663,031 
$
3,537,563 
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties, and the lenders may have the right to put the securities back to the borrower.
83

Table of Contents
Real estate investments
Real estate investments represents directly owned property held for investment purposes and consisted of land with a carrying value of $15.0 million and
$14.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. There was no accumulated depreciation on real estate investments at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
During the third quarter of 2023, the Company sold the parking deck, one of the office buildings and the related in-place leases of its real estate investment
property for approximately $62.0 million in cash, net of seller’s costs. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of $4.3 million, which is included in net
realized investment gains on the consolidated statement of income. The Company used the net sale proceeds to pay down a portion of its Credit Facility.
Concurrent with the sale of the investment property, the Company refined its plans for the remainder of the property and determined the predominant use of the
remaining office building would be for future office space expansion. Upon this determination, the Company reclassified the carrying value of the building to
construction in progress within property and equipment.
Net investment income
The following table presents the components of net investment income:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Interest:
Taxable bonds
$
143,242 
$
92,227 
$
44,806 
Municipal bonds (tax exempt)
1,592 
2,217 
3,380 
Cash equivalents and short-term investments
3,012 
3,004 
1,251 
Dividends on equity securities
6,442 
5,097 
4,406 
Real estate investment income
153 
3,716 
234 
Gross investment income
154,441 
106,261 
54,077 
Investment expenses
(4,154)
(3,926)
(2,795)
Net investment income
$
150,287 
$
102,335 
$
51,282 
There was no depreciation expense related to real estate investments for the year ended December 31, 2024 as the Company sold the related assets during 2023.
Investment expenses included depreciation expense related to real estate investments of $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2023
and 2022, respectively.
84

Table of Contents
Realized investment gains and losses
The following table presents realized investment gains and losses:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Fixed-maturity securities:
Realized gains
$
1,151 
$
1,852 
$
1,078 
Realized losses
(1,131)
(2,374)
(904)
Net realized gains (losses) from fixed-maturity securities
20 
(522)
174 
Equity securities:
Realized gains
7,271 
7,678 
1,363 
Realized losses
(455)
(5,329)
(297)
Net realized gains from equity securities
6,816 
2,349 
1,066 
Realized losses from the sales of short-term investments
— 
(37)
(49)
Realized (losses) gains on sale of real estate investments
(5)
4,250 
— 
Net realized investment gains
$
6,831 
$
6,040 
$
1,191 
The net realized gains or losses on sales of equity securities represent the total gains or losses from the purchase dates of the equity securities. The change in
unrealized gains (losses) in the consolidated statement of income consists of two components: (1) the reversal of the gain or loss recognized in previous periods
on equity securities sold and (2) the change in unrealized gain or loss resulting from mark-to-market adjustments on equity securities still held.
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on fixed-maturity securities
The change in net unrealized gains (losses) for fixed-maturity securities was $(3.3) million, $51.0 million, and $(193.7) million for the years ended
December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
Insurance – statutory deposits
The Company had invested assets with a carrying value of $3.7 million and $5.8 million on deposit with state regulatory authorities at December 31, 2024 and
2023, respectively.
Payable for investments purchased
The Company did not have a payable for investments purchased at December 31, 2024. The Company recorded a payable for investments purchased, not yet
settled, of $12.3 million at December 31, 2023. The payable balance was included in the other liabilities line item of the consolidated balance sheet.
3.     Fair value measurements
Fair value is estimated for each class of financial instrument based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. Fair value is defined as
the price in the principal market that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability to facilitate an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not acting under
duress. Fair value hierarchy disclosures are based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value.
85

Table of Contents
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
Level 2 - Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets
or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset or liability and are significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair values of the Company's investment portfolio are estimated using unadjusted prices obtained by its investment accounting vendor from nationally
recognized third-party pricing services, where available. Values for U.S. Treasuries, exchange traded funds and common stocks are generally based on Level 1
inputs which use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. For other fixed-maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock, the pricing
vendors use a pricing methodology involving the market approach, including pricing models which use prices and relevant market information regarding a
particular security or securities with similar characteristics to establish a valuation. The estimates of fair value of these investments are included in the amounts
disclosed as Level 2. For those investments where significant inputs are unobservable, the Company's investment accounting vendor obtains valuations from
pricing vendors or brokers using the market approach and income approach valuation techniques and are disclosed as Level 3.
Management performs several procedures to ascertain the reasonableness of investment values included in the consolidated financial statements at
December 31, 2024 and 2023, including 1) obtaining and reviewing internal control reports from the Company's investment accounting vendor that assess fair
values from third party pricing services, 2) discussing with the Company's investment accounting vendor its process for reviewing and validating pricing
obtained from third party pricing services and 3) reviewing the security pricing received from the Company's investment accounting vendor and monitoring
changes in unrealized gains and losses at the individual security level. The Company has evaluated the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to
determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy level based upon trading activity and the observability of market inputs.
86

Table of Contents
The following tables present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, by level within the fair value
hierarchy:
December 31, 2024
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
Assets
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government
agencies
$
15,048 
$
— 
$
— 
$
15,048 
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
— 
146,304 
— 
146,304 
Corporate and other securities
— 
1,989,490 
— 
1,989,490 
Asset-backed securities
— 
732,742 
— 
732,742 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
— 
448,874 
— 
448,874 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
— 
205,105 
— 
205,105 
Total fixed maturities
15,048 
3,522,515 
— 
3,537,563 
Equity securities:
Exchange traded funds
129,731 
— 
— 
129,731 
Non-redeemable preferred stock
— 
26,433 
— 
26,433 
Common stocks
242,195 
— 
— 
242,195 
Total equity securities
371,926 
26,433 
— 
398,359 
Short-term investments
3,714 
— 
— 
3,714 
Total
$
390,688 
$
3,548,948 
$
— 
$
3,939,636 
December 31, 2023
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
Assets
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government
agencies
$
22,235 
$
5,019 
$
— 
$
27,254 
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
— 
171,044 
— 
171,044 
Corporate and other securities
— 
1,387,693 
— 
1,387,693 
Asset-backed securities
— 
641,760 
— 
641,760 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
— 
417,106 
— 
417,106 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
— 
66,902 
— 
66,902 
Total fixed maturities
22,235 
2,689,524 
— 
2,711,759 
Equity securities:
Exchange traded funds
106,300 
— 
— 
106,300 
Non-redeemable preferred stock
— 
33,173 
— 
33,173 
Common stocks
95,340 
— 
— 
95,340 
Total equity securities
201,640 
33,173 
— 
234,813 
Short-term investments
1,862 
3,727 
— 
5,589 
Total
$
225,737 
$
2,726,424 
$
— 
$
2,952,161 
87

Table of Contents
There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2024 or 2023.
The carrying amount of the Company's fixed-rate senior notes was $175.0 million, less debt issuance cost, and the corresponding estimated fair value was
$168.6 million and $171.6 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The fair value measurement was determined using a discounted cash flow
analysis that factors in current market yields for comparable borrowing arrangements under the Company's credit profile. Since this methodology is based upon
market yields for comparable arrangements, the measurement is categorized as Level 2. The estimated fair value of outstanding borrowings under the
Company's revolving Credit Facility approximated its carrying value at December 31, 2024 and 2023. See Note 11 for further information regarding the
Company's debt arrangements.
The Company holds cash equivalents that are managed as part of its investment portfolio and, due to the short-term maturities of these assets, the carrying
value of these investments approximates fair value. The Company held cash equivalents of $16.1 million and $11.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively.
4.     Deferred policy acquisition costs
The following table presents the amounts of policy acquisition costs deferred and amortized for the years ended:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year
$
88,395 
$
61,594 
$
41,968 
Policy acquisition costs deferred:
Direct commissions
274,124 
227,755 
160,523 
Ceding commissions
(120,459)
(88,449)
(48,022)
Other underwriting and policy acquisition costs
14,215 
10,982 
8,155 
Policy acquisition costs deferred
167,880 
150,288 
120,656 
Amortization of net policy acquisition costs
(147,012)
(123,487)
(101,030)
Balance, end of year
$
109,263 
$
88,395 
$
61,594 
Amortization of net policy acquisition costs is included in underwriting, acquisition and insurance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income.
5.     Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses consist of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses incurred:
Direct commissions
$
254,523 
$
198,715 
$
138,451 
Ceding commissions
(120,339)
(84,998)
(44,695)
Other underwriting expenses
151,624 
115,253 
86,566 
Total
$
285,808 
$
228,970 
$
180,322 
Other underwriting expenses within underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses included salaries, employee benefits and bonus expense of $109.3
million, $85.7 million and $64.8 million, for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
88

Table of Contents
6.     Income taxes
The Company’s subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Under a tax sharing agreement, Kinsale collects from or refunds to its
subsidiaries the amount of taxes determined as if Kinsale and the subsidiaries filed separate returns. The Company is no longer subject to income tax
examination by tax authorities for the years ended before January 1, 2021.
Income tax expense includes the following components for the years ending December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Current federal income tax expense
$
103,701 
$
85,353 
$
50,641 
Deferred federal income tax benefit
(3,828)
(9,429)
(14,191)
Income tax expense
$
99,873 
$
75,924 
$
36,450 
The Company paid $104.1 million, $84.6 million and $43.1 million in federal income taxes during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022,
respectively. Current income taxes payable were $2.8 million and $3.2 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and included in other liabilities in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The prevailing federal income tax rate was 21% in December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. The Company’s effective income tax rate on income before income
taxes differs from the prevailing federal income tax rate and is summarized as follows:
Year ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Income tax expense at federal income tax rate
$
108,090 
$
80,644 
$
41,068 
Stock options exercised
(7,972)
(3,676)
(3,240)
Restricted stock award vesting
(2,147)
(1,256)
(1,048)
Tax-exempt investment income
(249)
(347)
(527)
Other
2,151 
559 
197 
Total
$
99,873 
$
75,924 
$
36,450 
89

Table of Contents
The significant components of the net deferred tax asset are summarized as follows:
December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Unrealized losses on fixed-maturity securities
$
26,343 
$
25,655 
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
36,491 
27,422 
Unearned premiums
32,580 
27,251 
State operating loss carryforwards
8,859 
6,012 
Stock compensation
3,276 
2,155 
Allowance for credit losses
5,210 
2,810 
Other
1,939 
2,394 
Deferred tax assets before allowance
114,698 
93,699 
Less: valuation allowance
(9,066)
(6,182)
Total deferred tax assets
105,632 
87,517 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Unrealized gains on equity securities
17,774 
8,667 
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net of ceding commissions
22,945 
18,563 
Property and equipment
3,263 
3,005 
Other
1,435 
1,583 
Total deferred tax liabilities
45,417 
31,818 
Net deferred tax asset
$
60,215 
$
55,699 
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had state net operating losses ("NOLs") of $186.9 million and $126.8 million, respectively. The state NOLs are
available to offset future taxable income or reduce taxes payable and begin expiring in 2029. 
Management evaluates the need for a valuation allowance related to its deferred tax assets. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded a tax
valuation allowance equal to the state NOLs and the deferred tax assets, net of existing deferred tax liabilities that were expected to reverse in future periods,
related to certain state jurisdictions. No other valuation allowances were established against the Company’s deferred tax assets at December 31, 2024 and 2023,
as the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized given the carry back availability, reversal of
existing temporary differences and future taxable income. With respect to deferred tax assets associated with unrealized losses on fixed-maturity securities,
management has the ability and intent to execute a tax planning strategy to hold those securities to recovery or maturity to the extent not matched with realized
capital gains or available carry back to ensure recognition of the deferred tax asset. After consideration of all available evidence, we concluded that it is more
likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized.
The Company did not have any material uncertain tax positions in 2024 or 2023. Management is not aware of any events that would give rise to any material
uncertain tax positions.
90

Table of Contents
7.     Reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
The reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represent the Company's estimated ultimate cost of all unreported and reported but unpaid insured
claims and the cost to adjust these claims. Reserves are estimated using individual case-basis valuations of reported claims and statistical analyses. Case
reserves are established for individual claims that have been reported to the Company, typically by the Company's insureds or their brokers. Based on the
information provided, case reserves are established by estimating the ultimate losses from the claim, including defense costs associated with the ultimate
settlement of the claim. Incurred-but-not-reported ("IBNR") reserves are determined using actuarial methods to estimate losses that have occurred but have not
yet been reported to the Company. Various actuarial methods are used to arrive at the Company's loss reserve estimates for each line of business. These
methods utilize numerous inputs including initial expected loss ratios, loss development patterns, paid losses, reported losses, claim counts and price indices.
The Company also uses industry and peer-group data, in addition to its own data, to assist in analyzing loss development patterns by line of business.
As part of the reserving process, the Company reviews historical data and considers the effect of various factors on claims development patterns including
polices written on a "claims made" versus "occurrence" basis. Policies written on a claims made basis provide coverage to the insured only for losses incurred
during the coverage period, and only if the claim was reported during a specified reporting period. Policies written on an occurrence basis provide coverage to
the insured for liabilities arising from events occurring during the term of the policy, regardless of when a claim is actually made. Accordingly, claims related to
policies written on an occurrence basis may arise many years after a policy has lapsed. Property losses, while written on an occurrence basis, are generally
reported within a short time from the date of loss, and in most instances, property claims are settled and paid within a relatively short period of time.
The following table presents a reconciliation of consolidated beginning and ending reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses:
December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Gross reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of
year
$
1,692,875 
$
1,238,402 
$
881,344 
Less: reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
241,357 
177,039 
117,561 
Net reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, beginning
of year
1,451,518 
1,061,363 
763,783 
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses:
Current year
810,554 
635,993 
493,800 
Prior years
(37,655)
(35,774)
(35,887)
Total net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
772,899 
600,219 
457,913 
Payments:
Current year
49,747 
38,565 
49,205 
Prior years
212,062 
171,499 
111,128 
Total payments
261,809 
210,064 
160,333 
Net reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, end of year
1,962,608 
1,451,518 
1,061,363 
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses, net of allowance
323,060 
241,357 
177,039 
Gross reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, end of
year
$
2,285,668 
$
1,692,875 
$
1,238,402 
During the year ended December 31, 2024, prior accident years developed favorably by $37.7 million, of which $57.6 million was attributable to the 2021
through 2023 accident years due to lower emergence of reported losses than expected across most lines of business. This favorable development was offset in
part by adverse development primarily from the 2017 through 2019 accident years due to construction defect claims that are more exposed to inflation, from
the 2020 accident year due to a large property claim and more conservative actuarial assumptions in the 2021 through 2023 accident years for lines of business
exposed to construction liability.
91

Table of Contents
Current accident year incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 included $25.5 million of net catastrophe losses
primarily related to Hurricanes Milton, Helene and Francine and tornadoes in the Midwest.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, prior accident years developed favorably by $35.8 million, of which $49.0 million was attributable to the 2021 and
2022 accident years due to lower emergence of reported losses than expected across most lines of business. This favorable development was offset in part by
adverse development largely from the 2017 through 2019 accident years due to construction defect claims that are more exposed to inflation.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, prior accident years developed favorably by $35.9 million, of which $41.8 million was attributable to the 2020 and
2021 accident years due to lower emergence of reported losses than expected across most lines of business. This favorable development was offset in part by
adverse development largely from the 2016 and 2018 accident years due to routine variability in reported losses and modest adjustments in actuarial
assumptions.
Current accident year incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 included $26.6 million of catastrophe losses
primarily related to Hurricane Ian.
Incurred and Paid Claims Development
The following is information about incurred and paid claims development as of December 31, 2024, net of reinsurance, as well as cumulative claim frequency
and the total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claims included within the net incurred claims amounts. The development and claims
duration tables below exclude commuted multi-line quota-share reinsurance treaty ("MLQS") contracts, which would distort development patterns related to
those transactions. Cumulative number of reported claims is reported on a per claim basis.
The information about incurred and paid claims development for the years ended December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2023, is presented as unaudited
supplementary information.
Property
Incurred Claims and Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
As of December 31, 2024
Accident Year
2020
Unaudited
2021
Unaudited
2022
Unaudited
2023
Unaudited
2024
Total of IBNR Liabilities
Plus Expected
Development on
Reported Claims
Cumulative Number of
Reported Claims
($ in thousands)
2020
$
40,612 
$
37,939 
$
36,807 
$
37,078 
$
42,287 
$
— 
2,309 
2021
36,531 
33,518 
29,750 
31,392 
1,087 
1,146 
2022
67,127 
53,676 
53,527 
4,131 
2,346 
2023
75,517 
54,503 
24,306 
979 
2024
112,051 
61,791 
1,376 
Total
$
293,760 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
Accident Year
2020
Unaudited
2021
Unaudited
2022
Unaudited
2023
Unaudited
2024
($ in thousands)
2020
$
19,897 
$
30,321 
$
31,765 
$
35,023 
$
41,696 
2021
14,268 
21,257 
27,324 
30,200 
2022
33,004 
46,965 
48,030 
2023
20,267 
26,434 
2024
31,303 
Total
177,663 
All outstanding liabilities before 2020, net of reinsurance
15 
Liabilities for claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
$
116,112 
92

Table of Contents
Historical Claims Duration
The following is supplementary information about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2024:
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Unaudited)
Years
1
2
3
4
5
Property
43.9 %
21.1 %
8.2 %
8.4 %
15.8 %
Casualty - Claims Made
Incurred Claims and Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
As of December 31, 2024
Accident
Year
2015
Unaudited
2016
Unaudited
2017
Unaudited
2018
Unaudited
2019
Unaudited
2020
Unaudited
2021
Unaudited
2022
Unaudited
2023
Unaudited
2024
Total of IBNR
Liabilities Plus
Expected
Development on
Reported Claims
Cumulative
Number of
Reported
Claims
($ in thousands)
2015
$
18,883 
$
16,777 
$
14,896 
$
13,583 
$
13,942 
$
13,548 
$
13,414 
$
13,066 
$
12,759 
$
12,679 
$
20 
260 
2016
19,170 
14,693 
14,675 
14,322 
13,583 
13,602 
13,228 
12,707 
12,703 
12 
312 
2017
18,116 
17,097 
16,120 
15,794 
14,989 
13,698 
13,471 
12,840 
39 
372 
2018
22,429 
20,234 
18,612 
17,057 
14,411 
14,272 
14,186 
840 
466 
2019
34,693 
29,056 
26,426 
24,489 
21,788 
22,839 
2,583 
565 
2020
55,630 
44,641 
38,287 
33,667 
28,877 
5,467 
787 
2021
84,018 
66,191 
52,935 
36,710 
18,461 
1,081 
2022
101,064 
81,394 
60,873 
32,026 
1,234 
2023
115,858 
91,516 
61,696 
1,467 
2024
123,511 
103,838 
1,461 
Total
$
416,734 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
Accident
Year
2015
Unaudited
2016
Unaudited
2017
Unaudited
2018
Unaudited
2019
Unaudited
2020
Unaudited
2021
Unaudited
2022
Unaudited
2023
Unaudited
2024
($ in thousands)
2015
$
217 
$
4,496 
$
7,563 
$
9,238 
$
11,372 
$
11,522 
$
12,142 
$
12,463 
$
12,474 
$
12,659 
2016
1,158 
3,015 
6,907 
9,839 
11,381 
12,105 
12,299 
12,691 
12,691 
2017
340 
4,897 
8,252 
10,484 
11,357 
12,235 
12,335 
12,779 
2018
507 
5,030 
8,931 
10,330 
11,205 
12,623 
13,247 
2019
2,487 
6,005 
10,123 
14,476 
15,406 
16,598 
2020
1,002 
7,446 
12,551 
18,589 
22,445 
2021
1,146 
8,437 
12,895 
16,294 
2022
3,052 
12,381 
24,033 
2023
4,830 
16,895 
2024
6,755 
Total
154,396 
All outstanding liabilities before 2015, net of reinsurance
132 
Liabilities for claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
$
262,470 
93

Table of Contents
Casualty - Occurrence
Incurred Claims and Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
As of December 31, 2024
Accident
Year
2015
Unaudited
2016
Unaudited
2017
Unaudited
2018
Unaudited
2019
Unaudited
2020
Unaudited
2021
Unaudited
2022
Unaudited
2023
Unaudited
2024
Total of IBNR
Liabilities Plus
Expected
Development on
Reported Claims
Cumulative
Number of
Reported
Claims
($ in thousands)
2015
$
59,717 
$
51,739 
$
49,122 
$
52,100 
$
54,697 
$
54,090 
$
54,090 
$
54,637 
$
55,259 
$
56,101 
$
3,740 
1,947 
2016
61,440 
55,680 
53,549 
55,534 
57,401 
60,861 
64,612 
65,323 
65,025 
5,511 
1,694 
2017
71,126 
67,151 
68,985 
70,641 
71,117 
69,911 
76,715 
79,203 
9,117 
2,288 
2018
86,157 
78,331 
78,386 
83,952 
93,215 
97,005 
101,939 
13,824 
2,585 
2019
112,266 
109,994 
108,138 
107,480 
115,681 
120,003 
26,442 
2,535 
2020
154,619 
136,212 
131,082 
135,045 
140,203 
69,005 
3,072 
2021
200,598 
190,879 
193,722 
204,787 
127,633 
3,228 
2022
272,692 
271,399 
287,977 
199,307 
3,832 
2023
372,245 
372,413 
322,319 
3,813 
2024
490,719 
471,397 
2,513 
Total
$
1,918,370 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
Accident
Year
2015
Unaudited
2016
Unaudited
2017
Unaudited
2018
Unaudited
2019
Unaudited
2020
Unaudited
2021
Unaudited
2022
Unaudited
2023
Unaudited
2024
($ in thousands)
2015
$
941 
$
3,161 
$
12,685 
$
28,385 
$
37,690 
$
41,724 
$
44,161 
$
47,106 
$
49,147 
$
51,010 
2016
1,099 
6,015 
17,225 
28,924 
34,437 
43,311 
51,533 
55,595 
57,421 
2017
1,581 
9,352 
22,407 
37,736 
46,025 
52,069 
61,108 
66,435 
2018
2,638 
10,995 
22,860 
35,138 
54,441 
72,174 
82,927 
2019
3,944 
16,687 
30,518 
46,478 
69,384 
84,496 
2020
2,400 
8,673 
17,805 
32,606 
55,548 
2021
3,205 
12,944 
31,494 
57,465 
2022
4,658 
23,084 
56,201 
2023
4,329 
21,930 
2024
6,032 
Total
539,465 
All outstanding liabilities before 2015, net of reinsurance
6,942 
Liabilities for claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
$
1,385,847 
Historical Claims Duration
The following is supplementary information about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2024:
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Unaudited)
Years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Casualty - claims made
5.0 %
22.4 %
21.9 %
16.1 %
9.9 %
5.8 %
2.9 %
3.0 %
— %
1.5 %
Casualty - occurrence
1.9 %
6.7 %
12.6 %
16.3 %
15.0 %
11.7 %
9.7 %
6.1 %
3.2 %
3.3 %
94

Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Incurred and Paid Claims Development to the Liability for Unpaid Claims and Claim Adjustment Expenses
The reconciliation of the net incurred and paid claims development tables to the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses in the consolidated
statement of financial position is as follows:
(in thousands)
December 31, 2024
Net outstanding liabilities
Property
$
116,112 
Casualty - claims made
262,470 
Casualty - occurrence
1,385,847 
Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
1,764,429 
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid claims
Property
99,478 
Casualty - claims made
21,051 
Casualty - occurrence
203,463 
Allowance for credit losses
(932)
Total reinsurance recoverable on unpaid claims
323,060 
Unallocated claims adjustment expenses
197,247 
Allowance for credit losses
932 
Gross liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expense
$
2,285,668 
95

Table of Contents
8.     Reinsurance
The Company purchases reinsurance from other insurance companies ("reinsurers") in order to limit its exposure to large losses and enable it to underwrite
policies with sufficient limits to meet policyholder needs. In a reinsurance transaction, an insurance company transfers, or cedes, part or all of its exposure to
the reinsurer that receives a portion of the premium. The ceding of insurance does not legally discharge the Company from its primary liability for the full
amount of the policy coverage, and therefore the Company will be required to pay the loss and bear collection risk if the reinsurer fails to meet its obligations
under the reinsurance agreement.
The following table summarizes the effect of reinsurance on premiums written and earned:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Written:
Direct
$
1,870,341 
$
1,568,815 
$
1,102,092 
Ceded
(392,993)
(304,185)
(165,282)
Net written
$
1,477,348 
$
1,264,630 
$
936,810 
Earned:
Direct
$
1,743,243 
$
1,367,141 
$
950,145 
Ceded
(392,773)
(294,604)
(156,026)
Net earned
$
1,350,470 
$
1,072,537 
$
794,119 
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses were net of reinsurance recoverables (ceded incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses) of $125.4 million,
$115.9 million and $117.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Reinsurance balances
The following table presents reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid losses as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
Reinsurance recoverables on paid losses
$
14,831 
$
6,479 
Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses
323,060 
241,357 
Reinsurance recoverables
$
337,891 
$
247,836 
Credit risk exists with reinsurance ceded to the extent that any reinsurer is unable to meet the obligations assumed under the reinsurance agreements.
Allowances are established for amounts deemed uncollectible. The Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentration of
credit risk arising from its exposure to individual reinsurers. All reinsurance recoverables are from companies with A.M. Best ratings of "A-" (Excellent) or
better. To further reduce credit exposure to reinsurance recoverable balances, the Company has received letters of credit from certain reinsurers that are not
authorized as reinsurers under U.S. state insurance regulations. The Company recorded an allowance for credit losses of $0.9 million and $0.7 million related to
its reinsurance balances at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively; however, the deterioration in the credit quality of existing reinsurers or disputes over
reinsurance agreements could result in future charges.
At December 31, 2024, reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid losses from the Company’s five largest reinsurers were $83.8 million, $37.6 million, $34.3
million, $30.0 million and $20.5 million, representing 61.0% of the total balance.
At December 31, 2024, unearned premiums ceded to five reinsurers were $11.5 million, $6.3 million, $5.5 million, $4.8 million and $4.7 million representing
62.2% of the total balance.
96

Table of Contents
9.     Stockholders’ equity
Capital Stock
The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
par value $0.01 per share. There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding at December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Treasury Stock
In October 2024, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of the
Company's common stock. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in open market purchases, privately-negotiated transactions, block purchases,
accelerated share repurchase agreements or a combination of methods and pursuant to safe harbors provided by Rule 10b-18 and Rule 10b5-1 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases under the share repurchase program will be determined by the
Company in its discretion. The stock repurchase program does not require the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares, and may be modified,
suspended or terminated at any time.
Public Offerings
In November 2022, the Company completed an underwritten public offering and sold and issued 155,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $308.30 per
share, to the underwriter. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of $47.5 million.
Equity-based Compensation
On July 27, 2016, the Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2016 Incentive Plan") became effective. The 2016 Incentive Plan, which
is administered by the Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Company's Board of Directors, provides for grants of stock
options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards to officers, employees, directors, independent contractors and consultants. The
number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2016 Incentive Plan may not exceed 2,073,832.
The Company recognized total equity-based compensation expense of $14.1 million, $9.4 million and $6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2024,
2023 and 2022, respectively.
Stock Options
On July 27, 2016, the Board of Directors approved, and the Company granted, 1,036,916 stock options with an exercise price equal to the initial public offering
price of $16.00 per share. The options have a maximum contractual term of 10 years and vested in 4 equal annual installments following the date of the grant.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2016 was $2.71 per share. The value of the options granted was estimated at the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
A summary of option activity as of December 31, 2024 and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
Number of Shares
Weighted-average
exercise price
Weighted-average
remaining years of
contractual life
Aggregate intrinsic
value (in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2023
201,560 
$
16.00 
Granted
— 
— 
Forfeited
— 
— 
Exercised
(83,092)
16.00 
Outstanding at December 31, 2024
118,468 
$
16.00 
1.6
$
53,208 
Exercisable at December 31, 2024
118,468 
$
16.00 
1.6
$
53,208 
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $38.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 and $17.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2023.
97

Table of Contents
Restricted Stock Awards
During 2024, the Board of Directors approved, and the Company granted, restricted stock awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan. The restricted stock awards
were valued on the date of grant and will vest over a period of 1 to 4 years corresponding to the anniversary date of the grants. The fair value of restricted stock
awards was determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date or, if no common stock was traded on the grant
date, the last preceding date for which there was a sale of common stock. Except for restrictions placed on the transferability of restricted stock, holders of
unvested restricted stock have full stockholder’s rights, including voting rights and the right to receive cash dividends. Unvested restricted stock awards and
accrued dividends, if any, are forfeited upon the termination of service to or employment with the Company.
A summary of restricted stock activity under the equity compensation plans for the year ended is as follows:
December 31, 2024
Number of Shares
Weighted Average Grant
Date Fair Value per Share
Nonvested outstanding at the beginning of the period
107,822 
$
250.86 
Granted
47,689 
$
502.43 
Vested
(41,872)
$
230.81 
Forfeited
(3,516)
$
308.84 
Nonvested outstanding at the end of the period
110,123 
$
366.73 
Employees surrender restricted stock awards to pay for withholding tax obligations resulting from any vesting of those awards. During the year ended
December 31, 2024, restricted stock awards withheld for taxes in connection with the vesting of those awards totaled 14,401.
The per share weighted average grant-date fair value of the Company's restricted stock awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and
2022 was $502.43, $313.35 and $211.86, respectively. The fair value of restricted stock awards that vested during the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and
2022 was $20.0 million, $12.8 million and $10.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $28.3 million of total unrecognized stock-
based compensation expense expected to be charged to earnings over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
Subsequent Events
The Board of Directors granted 3,186 restricted stock awards on January 1, 2025 under the 2016 Incentive Plan to the Company’s non-employee directors. The
restricted stock awards had a fair value on the date of grant of $465.13 per share and will vest on the first anniversary date of the grant.
On February 10, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.17 per share of common stock. This dividend is payable on March 13,
2025 to all stockholders of record on February 27, 2025.
98

Table of Contents
10.    Earnings per share
The following table represents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations contained in the
consolidated financial statements:
Year ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands, except per share data)
Net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
$
159,114 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
23,153
23,045
22,815
Dilutive effect of shares issued under stock compensation arrangements:
Stock options
136 
214 
269 
Restricted stock awards
43 
48 
41 
Total dilutive effect of shares issued under stock compensation
arrangements
179 
262 
310 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
23,332 
23,307 
23,125 
Earnings per common share:
Basic
$
17.92 
$
13.37 
$
6.97 
Diluted
$
17.78 
$
13.22 
$
6.88 
There were 43,000, 1,000 and zero anti-dilutive stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing the earnings attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share was computed by dividing earnings attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, including potentially dilutive shares of common stock for the period
determined using the treasury stock method.
11.     Debt
Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement
On July 22, 2022, the Company entered into a Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (as subsequently amended, the "Note Purchase Agreement") with
PGIM, Inc. ("Prudential") and the purchasers of the Series A and Series B Senior Notes (as defined below). The Note Purchase Agreement provides for
issuance of senior promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million through September 18, 2026.
Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, on July 22, 2022, the Company issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.15% Series A Senior Notes
Due July 22, 2034 (collectively, the "Series A Notes”), and on September 18, 2023, the Company issued a $50.0 million aggregate principal amount 6.21%
Series B Senior Note ("Series B Note") due July 22, 2034.
The Series A and B Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
Principal payments on the Series A Notes are required annually beginning on July 22, 2030 in equal installments of $25.0 million through July 22, 2034.
Principal payments on the Series B Note are required annually beginning on July 22, 2030 in equal installments of $10.0 million through July 22, 2034.
99

Table of Contents
Credit Agreement
On July 22, 2022, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as
issuing bank, Truist Bank, as syndication agent, and the lenders party thereto (collectively, the "Lenders"). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
provides the Company with a $100.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), with the option to increase the aggregate
commitment by $30.0 million. The Company is required to pay a Commitment Fee Rate (as defined therein) of 0.25% on the average daily amount of the
Available Revolving Commitment (as defined therein). Borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate
purposes (which may include, without limitation, to fund future growth, to finance working capital needs, to fund capital expenditures, and to refinance,
redeem or repay indebtedness). In September 2023, the Company used proceeds from the sale of its real estate investment property to pay down $62.0 million
from the Credit Facility.
The loans under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate equal to the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate (as
defined therein) plus 1.625% or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined therein) plus 0.625%. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the annual weighted-average
interest rate of borrowings under the Credit Facility was 6.91%.
The following table presents the Company's outstanding debt as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Issuance
Maturities
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
Credit Facility
Various
7/22/2027 $
11,000 
$
11,000 
5.15% Series A Notes
7/22/2022
7/22/2034
125,000 
125,000 
6.21% Series B Note
9/18/2023
7/22/2034
50,000 
50,000 
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs
(1,878)
(2,154)
Total debt
$
184,122 
$
183,846 
Interest paid under both agreements totaled $10.3 million, $10.5 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Both the Note Purchase Agreement and the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contain representations and affirmative and negative covenants, including
financial covenants customary for agreements of this type, as well as customary events of default provisions. In October 2024, the covenants limiting restricted
payments under the Note Purchase Agreement and Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were amended. The amendments allow the Company to make
restricted payments so long as the aggregate amount of all such restricted payments does not exceed the greater of $300.0 million and 6.5% of the total assets
of the Company and its subsidiaries at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants under both the Note Purchase Agreement and the Credit Facility.
12.     Contingencies
Contingencies arise in the normal conduct of the Company’s operations and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or
results of operations. However, adverse outcomes are possible and could negatively affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2019, Marie Hughes, as authorized administrator for the estate of George Hughes, filed a wrongful death claim against Venetian Hills Apartments, LLC
("Venetian Hills") in DeKalb County in Georgia state court. On December 20, 2023, the jury awarded a verdict to the plaintiff of $140 million.
Venetian Hills was a policyholder of a $1 million general liability policy issued by Kinsale Insurance. The Company believes exclusions in the policy apply to
the claim and intends to defend any action related to this proceeding vigorously. The Company
100

Table of Contents
has begun the appeal process and does not expect a resolution as to the Company’s liability, if any, with respect to this matter in the foreseeable future, and
potentially for multiple years.
The Company does not believe this legal proceeding will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or business. The Company believes
adequate provision has been made in its consolidated financial statements and its existing reserves account for liabilities to the Company relating to claims such
as this legal proceeding.
13.    Employee benefit plan
The Company has established a defined contribution employee retirement plan ("Plan") in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Expenses related to the Plan were $5.0 million, $3.8 million and $3.1 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
14.     Other comprehensive (loss) income
The following table summarizes the components of other comprehensive (loss) income:
Year Ending December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Unrealized (losses) gains on fixed-maturity securities arising during the
period, before income taxes:
$
(2,921)
$
49,384 
$
(193,970)
Income tax benefit (expense)
613 
(10,371)
40,734 
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period, net of income taxes
(2,308)
39,013 
(153,236)
Less reclassification adjustment:
Net realized investment (losses) gains on available-for-sale investments
(170)
(1,443)
121 
Income tax benefit (expense)
36 
303 
(25)
Reclassification adjustment included in net income
(134)
(1,140)
96 
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments, before income taxes
526 
(187)
(366)
Income tax (expense) benefit
(111)
39 
77 
Reclassification adjustment included in net income
415 
(148)
(289)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
$
(2,589)
$
40,301 
$
(153,043)
The sale of or credit loss on an available-for-sale security results in amounts being reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to realized gains
or losses in current period earnings. The related tax effect of the reclassification adjustment is recorded in income tax expense in current period earnings. See
Note 2 for additional information.
15.      Segment and underwriting information
The Company has one reportable segment, the Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance segment, which primarily offers commercial excess and surplus lines
liability and property insurance products through its underwriting divisions in the United States. The Company reports operating and financial results in a
single segment based on the Company's exclusive focus on property and casualty insurance in the excess and surplus lines market and the consolidated
information used by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM") in evaluating the financial performance of its business and allocating resources.
Additionally, while the
101

Table of Contents
Company's individual underwriting divisions are evaluated on premium volume, the CODM does not use discrete financial information for measures of profit
or loss in making resource allocation decisions.
The Company's CODM is the Chief Executive Officer. The CODM uses consolidated net income to allocate resources primarily during the annual budgeting
process and uses that measure to assess performance by considering budget-to-actual variances and evaluating financial results. The measure of segment assets
is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as total assets. The accounting policies used to prepare the segment reporting data are the same as those
described in Note 1.
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Revenues:
Net earned premiums
$
1,350,470 
$
1,072,537 
$
794,119 
Fee income
34,118 
27,026 
19,604 
Net investment income
150,287 
102,335 
51,282 
Change in fair value of equity securities
43,367 
15,277 
(27,723)
Net realized investment gains
6,831 
6,040 
1,191 
Change in allowance for credit losses on investments
526 
(187)
(366)
Other income 
1,926 
1,421 
697 
Total revenues
1,587,525 
1,224,449 
838,804 
Expenses:
Losses and loss adjustment expenses - current year
785,036 
631,407 
467,182 
Losses and loss adjustment expenses - catastrophes
25,518 
4,586 
26,618 
Losses and loss adjustment expenses - prior year development
(37,655)
(35,774)
(35,887)
Net commissions incurred
134,184 
113,717 
93,756 
Salaries, employee benefits and bonus expense
109,319 
85,689 
64,765 
Credit loss expense - premiums receivable
17,397 
9,790 
5,988 
Depreciation
4,686 
2,655 
2,267 
Interest expense
10,134 
10,301 
4,284 
Other segment items
24,190 
18,061 
14,267 
Income tax expense
99,873 
75,924 
36,450 
Segment net income
414,843 
308,093 
159,114 
Reconciliation of profit or loss:
Adjustments and reconciling items
— 
— 
— 
Consolidated net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
$
159,114 
 Other income primarily includes income generated from the Company's real estate operations.
 Excludes depreciation expense allocated to loss adjustment expenses and investment expenses
 Other segment items primarily includes other general and administrative expenses such as technology costs, facility expenses and audit and
inspection costs.
(1)
 (2)
 (3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
102

Table of Contents
Gross written premiums by underwriting division are presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial Property
$
456,170 
$
411,956 
$
181,505 
Excess Casualty
245,137 
194,049 
147,485 
Small Business Casualty
195,593 
174,080 
149,366 
General Casualty
169,162 
118,745 
69,784 
Construction
148,333 
137,887 
122,524 
Allied Health
83,058 
67,808 
58,839 
Small Business Property
76,800 
43,893 
21,002 
Products Liability
67,035 
61,786 
60,374 
Entertainment
58,506 
39,218 
22,268 
Energy
42,710 
38,637 
32,217 
Life Sciences
36,252 
41,379 
41,346 
Commercial Auto
35,047 
19,050 
5,950 
Professional Liability
34,841 
35,743 
30,313 
Excess Professional
32,633 
24,033 
22,826 
Environmental
30,372 
25,938 
19,455 
Inland Marine
27,184 
18,669 
14,396 
Health Care
23,179 
20,378 
16,916 
Management Liability
21,705 
26,617 
28,856 
Public Entity
20,047 
20,028 
15,512 
Aviation
8,591 
6,453 
4,424 
Ocean Marine
3,655 
2,339 
765 
Agribusiness
2,775 
— 
— 
Product Recall
2,397 
1,637 
1,419 
Railroad
225 
15 
— 
Total commercial
1,821,407 
1,530,338 
1,067,542 
Personal:
High Value Homeowners
26,844 
14,295 
3,261 
Personal Insurance
22,090 
24,182 
31,289 
Total personal
48,934 
38,477 
34,550 
Total
$
1,870,341 
$
1,568,815 
$
1,102,092 
Certain prior year amounts are reclassified to conform to current year's divisions and the business underwritten within them.
Commercial Property underwrites first-party coverage on manufacturing facilities, government and municipal buildings, professional buildings, offices and
general commercial properties, vacant properties, as well as entertainment and retail facilities.
Excess Casualty underwrites excess liability over risks that would fit within the general casualty, construction, products liability and small business casualty
divisions. Coverage is written over the Company's primary liability policies as well as those of other insurers. This division also writes excess liability over
primary commercial auto liability policies written by other carriers.
103

Table of Contents
Small Business Casualty underwrites commercial general liability on smaller risks, generally businesses with revenues not exceeding $2.5 million, with an
emphasis on artisan contractors and premises related exposures.
General Casualty underwrites general liability and liquor liability on hospitality, habitational and retail risks, among others, with similar premises liability loss
exposures.
Construction underwrites commercial general liability coverage on contractors focusing on new residential construction, residential remodeling and renovation
and commercial construction.
Allied Health underwrites commercial general liability, professional liability and excess liability on allied health and social service risks including assisted
living facilities, home health care agencies and outpatient medical facilities.
Small Business Property underwrites Commercial Property coverage for smaller properties, generally with total insured values not exceeding $3.5 million,
including banks, daycare centers, strip malls, and greenhouses, among others.
Products Liability underwrites commercial general liability on manufacturers, distributors and importers of a wide array of consumer, commercial and
industrial products.
Entertainment underwrites commercial general liability for small-to-medium sized entertainment classes, including such classes as bowling alleys,
campgrounds, escape rooms, fitness centers, museums and paintball facilities, among others.
Energy underwrites commercial general liability, pollution liability, professional liability and excess liability on enterprises engaged in the business of energy
production or distribution or mining including drillers, lease operators, contractors, product manufacturers and alternative energy.
Life Sciences underwrites general liability, products liability and professional liability coverage for manufacturers, distributors and developers of dietary
supplements, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, biologics, health and beauty products, durable medical equipment and clinical trials.
Commercial Auto underwrites garage liability and excess auto coverages.
Professional Liability underwrites small-to-medium sized non-medical professional liability risks. The classes of risks include accountants, architects and
engineers, financial planners, insurance agents, lawyers, realtors and certain other professions.
Excess Professional underwrites excess coverage over an array of insurance products in Allied Health, Management Liability, Health Care and Professional
Liability.
Environmental underwrites commercial general liability, pollution liability and professional liability on a wide range of commercial risks where environmental
exposures exist that are operational in nature or related to the premises.
Inland Marine underwrites a variety of inland marine coverages including builders risk, contractors' equipment, transportation risks and mobile equipment.
Health Care underwrites medical professional liability for physicians, surgeons, dentists, chiropractors and podiatrists. Policies cover both individuals and
small practice groups.
Management Liability underwrites directors and officers liability, employment practices liability and fiduciary liability coverage on a variety of commercial
and government risks.
Public Entity underwrites law enforcement professional liability and school board liability.
Aviation underwrites general liability coverage for small-to-medium sized aviation-related businesses.
Ocean Marine underwrites marine cargo coverage for small-to-medium sized risks that transport goods and products in domestic inland waterways and certain
U.S. coastal waters.
Agribusiness underwrites general liability coverage for operations, manufacturers and land related to the agriculture industry.
Product Recall underwrites recall expense and liability coverage for life sciences and general products sector consumable, commercial and consumer goods.
104

Table of Contents
Railroad underwrites excess liability for Class III short line railroads, railroad support activities and contractors and other miscellaneous railroad-related risks.
High Value Homeowners underwrites first party homeowners' coverage on homes valued above $1.0 million on a primary and excess basis.
Personal Insurance writes homeowners' coverage on manufactured homes with catastrophe exposure due to coastal location.
The Company does business with three unaffiliated insurance brokers that generated $366.4 million, $325.5 million and $213.9 million of gross written
premiums for the year ended December 31, 2024, representing 19.6%, 17.4% and 11.4% of gross written premiums, respectively. No other broker generated
10.0% or more of the gross written premiums for the year ended December 31, 2024.
16. Statutory financial information
Kinsale Insurance maintains its accounts in conformity with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by state regulatory authorities that vary in certain
respects from U.S. GAAP. In converting from statutory accounting principles to U.S. GAAP, typical adjustments include deferral of policy acquisition costs,
the inclusion of statutory non-admitted assets and the inclusion of net unrealized gains or losses relating to fixed maturities in stockholders’ equity. The
Company does not use any permitted practices that are different from prescribed statutory accounting practices.
Statutory net income and statutory capital and surplus for Kinsale Insurance as of December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022 and for the years then ended are
summarized as follows:
Year ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Statutory net income
$
357,896 
$
259,042 
$
151,105 
Statutory capital and surplus
$
1,525,851 
$
1,167,382 
$
835,664 
Kinsale Insurance is subject to risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements. RBC is a method developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
("NAIC") to determine the minimum amount of statutory capital appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations in
consideration of its size and risk profile. The formula for determining the amount of RBC is calculated using various factors, weighted based on the perceived
degree of risk, which are applied to certain financial balances and financial activity. The adequacy of a company’s actual capital is evaluated by a comparison
to the RBC results, as determined by the formula. Companies that do not maintain statutory capital and surplus at a level in excess of the company action level
RBC are required to take specified actions. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, actual statutory capital and surplus for Kinsale Insurance substantially exceeded
the regulatory requirements. 
Dividend payments to Kinsale from Kinsale Insurance are restricted by state insurance laws as to the amount that may be paid without prior approval of the
regulatory authorities of Arkansas. The maximum dividend distribution is limited by Arkansas law to the greater of 10% of policyholder surplus as of
December 31 of the previous year or statutory net income, not including realized capital gains, for the previous calendar year. Dividend payments are further
limited to that part of available policyholder surplus which is derived from net profits on its business. The maximum dividend distribution that can be paid by
Kinsale Insurance during 2025 without prior approval is $351.9 million.
105

Table of Contents
17.     Subsequent event
In January 2025, a series of wildfires began in Southern California. The Company is evaluating the impact of such wildfires and currently estimates pre-tax
catastrophe losses of approximately $25.0 million, net of reinsurance, to be reflected in the first quarter of 2025. These estimates are subject to change due to
the ongoing nature of these events and the complexity of the claims.
106

Table of Contents
Schedule I
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Summary of Investments—Other than Investments in Related Parties
Type of Investment
Cost or Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
(if applicable)
Amount at which
shown on Balance
Sheet
(in thousands)
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
15,465 
$
15,048 
$
15,048 
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
168,894 
146,304 
146,304 
Corporate and other securities
2,037,372 
1,989,490 
1,989,490 
Asset-backed securities
729,658 
732,742 
732,742 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
502,121 
448,874 
448,874 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
209,521 
205,105 
205,105 
Total fixed maturities
3,663,031 
3,537,563 
3,537,563 
Equity securities:
Common stocks:
ETFs (industrial, miscellaneous and all other)
72,773 
129,731 
129,731 
Banks, trust and insurance companies
47,994 
58,777 
58,777 
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
165,017 
183,418 
183,418 
Non-redeemable preferred stock
27,938 
26,433 
26,433 
Total equity securities
313,722 
398,359 
398,359 
Short-term investments
3,714 
3,714 
3,714 
Real estate investments (none acquired in satisfaction of debt)
15,045 
15,045 
Total investments
$
3,995,512 
$
3,954,681 
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
107

Table of Contents
Schedule II
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Balance Sheets (Parent Company Only)
December 31,
2024
2023
(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
12,336 
$
17,082 
Due from subsidiaries
52,296 
26,479 
Investment in subsidiaries
1,604,811 
1,230,371 
Deferred income tax asset, net
2,527 
1,673 
Other assets
664 
410 
Total assets
$
1,672,634 
$
1,276,015 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
2,001 
$
2,042 
Income taxes payable
2,842 
3,201 
Debt
184,122 
183,846 
Other liabilities
108 
94 
Total liabilities
189,073 
189,183 
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock
233 
232 
Additional paid-in capital
361,398 
352,970 
Retained earnings
1,229,136 
828,247 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(97,206)
(94,617)
Treasury stock, at cost
(10,000)
— 
Stockholders’ equity
1,483,561 
1,086,832 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,672,634 
$
1,276,015 
See accompanying notes to condensed financial information.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
108

Table of Contents
Schedule II
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Parent Company Only)
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Revenues:
Management fees from subsidiaries
$
16,769 
$
11,918 
$
8,686 
Net investment income
641 
— 
121 
Net realized investment gains
— 
— 
8 
Total revenues
17,410 
11,918 
8,815 
Expenses:
Operating expenses
17,193 
13,007 
9,765 
Interest expense
10,134 
10,301 
4,284 
Other expenses
615 
— 
— 
Total expenses
27,942 
23,308 
14,049 
Loss before income taxes
(10,532)
(11,390)
(5,234)
Income tax benefit
(12,346)
(7,324)
(5,387)
Income (loss) before equity in net income of subsidiaries
1,814 
(4,066)
153 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
413,029 
312,159 
158,961 
Net income
414,843 
308,093 
159,114 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Equity in other comprehensive (losses) income of subsidiaries
(2,589)
40,301 
(153,043)
Total comprehensive income
$
412,254 
$
348,394 
$
6,071 
See accompanying notes to condensed financial information.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
109

Table of Contents
Schedule II
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Statements of Cash Flows (Parent Company Only)
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income
$
414,843 
$
308,093 
$
159,114 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Deferred tax benefit
(854)
(372)
(367)
Stock compensation expense
14,146 
9,361 
6,678 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
(413,029)
(312,159)
(158,961)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(25,795)
55,893 
(71,639)
Current taxes payable
(359)
— 
— 
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(41)
— 
— 
Dividends received from subsidiary
47,000 
— 
— 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
35,911 
60,816 
(65,175)
Investing activities
Contributions to subsidiary
(11,000)
(50,000)
(100,624)
Net cash used in investing activities
(11,000)
(50,000)
(100,624)
Financing activities
Common stock issued, net of transaction costs
— 
— 
47,498 
Proceeds from credit facility
— 
— 
73,000 
Proceeds from notes payable
— 
50,000 
125,000 
Repayment of credit facility
— 
(62,000)
(43,000)
Debt issuance costs
— 
(164)
(2,381)
Payroll taxes withheld and remitted on share-based payments
(7,047)
(4,282)
(3,288)
Common stock issued, stock options exercised
1,330 
877 
1,090 
Dividends paid
(13,940)
(12,954)
(11,927)
Treasury stock acquired — share repurchases
(10,000)
— 
— 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(29,657)
(28,523)
185,992 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(4,746)
(17,707)
20,193 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
17,082 
34,789 
14,596 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
12,336 
$
17,082 
$
34,789 
See accompanying notes to condensed financial information.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
110

Table of Contents
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Notes to Condensed Financial Information
(Parent Company Only)
1. Accounting policies
Organization
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware domiciled insurance holding company, was formed on June 3, 2009 for the purpose of acquiring and
managing insurance entities.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment in consolidated
subsidiaries is stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings of consolidated subsidiaries since the date of acquisition. These condensed financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Estimates and assumptions
Preparation of the condensed financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the condensed financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Those estimates are inherently subject to change, and actual results may
ultimately differ from those estimates.
Debt
Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement
On July 22, 2022, the Company entered into a Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement (as subsequently amended, the "Note Purchase Agreement") with
PGIM, Inc. ("Prudential") and the purchasers of the Series A and Series B Senior Notes (as defined below). The Note Purchase Agreement provides for
issuance of senior promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million through September 18, 2026.
Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, on July 22, 2022, the Company issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.15% Series A Senior Notes
Due July 22, 2034 (collectively, the "Series A Notes”), and on September 18, 2023, the Company issued a $50.0 million aggregate principal amount 6.21%
Series B Senior Note ("Series B Note") due July 22, 2034.
The Series A and B Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
Principal payments on the Series A Notes are required annually beginning on July 22, 2030 in equal installments of $25.0 million through July 22, 2034.
Principal payments on the Series B Note are required annually beginning on July 22, 2030 in equal installments of $10.0 million through July 22, 2034.
Credit Agreement
On July 22, 2022, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as
issuing bank, Truist Bank, as syndication agent, and the lenders party
111

Table of Contents
thereto (collectively, the "Lenders"). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides the Company with a $100.0 million senior unsecured revolving
credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), with the option to increase the aggregate commitment by $30.0 million. The Company is required to pay a Commitment
Fee Rate (as defined therein) of 0.25% on the average daily amount of the Available Revolving Commitment (as defined therein). Borrowings under the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes (which may include, without limitation, to fund future growth, to finance
working capital needs, to fund capital expenditures, and to refinance, redeem or repay indebtedness). In September 2023, the Company used proceeds from the
sale of its real estate investment property to pay down $62.0 million from the Credit Facility.
The loans under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate equal to the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate (as
defined therein) plus 1.625% or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined therein) plus 0.625%. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the annual weighted-average
interest rate of borrowings under the Credit Facility was 6.91%.
The following table presents the Company's outstanding debt as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:
Issuance
Maturities
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
Credit Facility
Various
7/22/2027 $
11,000 
$
11,000 
5.15% Series A Notes
7/22/2022
7/22/2034
125,000 
125,000 
6.21% Series B Note
9/18/2023
7/22/2034
50,000 
50,000 
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs
(1,878)
(2,154)
Total debt
$
184,122 
$
183,846 
Interest paid under both agreements totaled $10.3 million, $10.5 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Both the Note Purchase Agreement and the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contain representations and affirmative and negative covenants, including
financial covenants customary for agreements of this type, as well as customary events of default provisions. In October 2024, the covenants limiting restricted
payments under the Note Purchase Agreement and Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were amended. The amendments allow the Company to make
restricted payments so long as the aggregate amount of all such restricted payments does not exceed the greater of $300.0 million and 6.5% of the total assets
of the Company and its subsidiaries at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants under both the Note Purchase Agreement and the Credit Facility.
Dividends from subsidiary
Cash dividends paid to Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kinsale Insurance Company, were $47.0 million for year ended
December 31, 2024. There were no cash dividends paid by the insurance subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Contingencies
Liabilities for loss contingencies, arising from non-insurance policy claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and penalties and other sources, are recorded when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred in
connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
112

Table of Contents
Schedule V
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Additions
Deductions
(in thousands)
Balance
at Beginning
of Period
Amounts
Charged to
Expense
Amounts
Written Off or
Disposals
Balance
at End
of Period
Year Ended December 31, 2024:
Allowance for premiums receivable
$
13,383 
$
17,397 
$
3,854 
$
26,926 
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
6,182 
2,884 
— 
9,066 
Allowance for reinsurance recoverables
744 
188 
— 
932 
Allowance for credit losses on fixed-maturity investments
553 
(47)
479 
27 
Year Ended December 31, 2023:
Allowance for premiums receivable
8,067 
9,790 
4,474 
13,383 
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
5,188 
994 
— 
6,182 
Allowance for reinsurance recoverables
459 
285 
— 
744 
Allowance for credit losses on fixed-maturity investments
366 
199 
12 
553 
Year Ended December 31, 2022:
Allowance for premiums receivable
3,391 
5,988 
1,312 
8,067 
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
4,159 
1,029 
— 
5,188 
Allowance for reinsurance recoverables
400 
59 
— 
459 
Allowance for credit losses on fixed-maturity investments
— 
366 
— 
366 
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
113

Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The Company’s management, with
the participation of the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
accomplish their objectives at the reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2024. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the report of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2024 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Securities Trading Plans of Directors and Executive Officers
Transactions in our securities by our non-employee directors and executive officers are required to be made in accordance with our insider trading policy,
which, among other things, requires that the transactions be in accordance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws that prohibit trading while in possession
of material nonpublic information. Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act provides an affirmative defense that enables prearranged transactions in securities in a
manner that avoids concerns about initiating transactions at a future date while possibly in possession of material nonpublic information. Our insider trading
policy permits our non-employee directors and executive officers to enter into trading plans designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1.
114

Table of Contents
The following table describes any contracts, instructions or written plans adopted for the sale or purchase of our securities by our non-employee directors and
executive officers during the fourth quarter of 2024, which is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c), referred to as Rule 10b5-
1 trading plans.
Name
Title
Date of Adoption of Rule
10b5-1 Trading Plan
Scheduled Expiration Date of
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan
Aggregate Number of Securities to Be
Purchased or Sold
Gregory M. Share
Director
December 11, 2024
January 30, 2026
Sale of up to 1,578 shares beginning on the
commencement date of the trading period
 A trading plan may also expire on such earlier date as all transactions under the trading plan are completed.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, none of our non-employee directors or executive officers modified or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or adopted,
modified or terminated a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K).
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
(1)
(1)
115

Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the definitive Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not
later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company has an insider trading policy governing purchases, sales and other dispositions of the Company's securities that applies to the Company's
directors, officers, employees, agents and other covered persons. It is also Company policy to comply with applicable securities laws concerning trading in
Company securities on the Company's behalf. The Company believes that its insider trading policy and procedures are reasonably designed to promote
compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and listing standards applicable to the Company. A copy of the Company's insider trading policy is
filed as Exhibit 19 to this Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the definitive Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not
later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the definitive Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not
later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the definitive Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not
later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Our independent registered public accounting firm is KPMG LLP, Richmond, VA, Auditor Firm ID: 185.
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the definitive Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not
later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
116

Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following consolidated financial statements of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries are filed as part of this report under Item 8 — Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data:
Page
1. Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
68
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
68
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023
72
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
73
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
74
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
75
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
76
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule I - Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties
107
Schedule II - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant - Parent Company Only
108
Schedule V - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
113
All other financial schedules are not required under the related instructions, or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
117

Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 24, 2018)
3.2
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2023)
4.1
Description of Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on
February 25, 2022)
10.1+
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on July 18, 2016)
10.1a+
Amendment to Outstanding Awards under the Kinsale Capital Group Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1a to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2018)
10.1b+
Amendment to the Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1b to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2024)
10.2a+
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Award Agreement (Employee) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5a to Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on July 18, 2016)
10.2b+
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Award Agreement (Director) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5b to Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on July 18, 2016)
10.3+
Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2018)
10.4+
Employment and Arbitration Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2009 between Kinsale Management, Inc. and Michael P. Kehoe (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on July 1, 2016) 
10.5
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on July 18, 2016)
10.6
Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2022, among Kinsale Capital Group, Inc., PGIM, Inc. and the purchasers
of the Notes named in the Purchaser Schedule attached thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 22, 2022)
10.6a
First Amendment to the Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2023, among Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.,
PGIM, Inc. and the other noteholders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2023)
10.6b
Second Amendment to the Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2024, among Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.,
PGIM, Inc. and the other noteholders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form
10-Q filed with the SEC on October 24, 2024)
10.7
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2022, among Kinsale Capital Group, Inc., as borrower, JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as issuing bank, Truist Bank, as syndication agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 22, 2022)
10.7a
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2023, among Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.,
as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as lender, Truist Bank, as lender, and CIBC Bank USA, as lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2023).
10.7b
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2024, among Kinsale Capital Group, Inc., as
borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as lender, Truist Bank, as lender, and CIBC Bank USA, as lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 24, 2024)
19
Policy on the Prevention of Insider Trading and Selective Disclosure
21.1
List of subsidiaries of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
23.1
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
118

Table of Contents
31.2
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
97
Clawback Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February
23, 2024)
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded
within the Inline XBRL document)
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
*    This certification is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be
deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
+    Compensatory plan or arrangement
119

Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February 21, 2025.
KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
By: /s/ Michael P. Kehoe                                    
  Michael P. Kehoe
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Michael P. Kehoe
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2025
Michael P. Kehoe
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Bryan P. Petrucelli
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
February 21, 2025
Bryan P. Petrucelli
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Christopher R. Tangard
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
February 21, 2025
Christopher R. Tangard
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Steven J. Bensinger
Director
February 21, 2025
Steven J. Bensinger
/s/ Teresa P. Chia
Director
February 21, 2025
Teresa P. Chia
/s/ Mary Jane B. Fortin
Director
February 21, 2025
Mary Jane B. Fortin
/s/ Robert V. Hatcher, III
Director
February 21, 2025
Robert V. Hatcher, III
/s/ Anne C. Kronenberg
Director
February 21, 2025
Anne C. Kronenberg
/s/ Robert Lippincott III
Director
February 21, 2025
Robert Lippincott III
/s/ James J. Ritchie
Director
February 21, 2025
James J. Ritchie
/s/ Frederick L. Russell, Jr.
Director
February 21, 2025
Frederick L. Russell, Jr.
/s/ Gregory M. Share
Director
February 21, 2025
Gregory M. Share
120

Exhibit 19
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
POLICY ON THE PREVENTION OF INSIDER TRADING AND SELECTIVE DISCLOSURE
Introduction
In the normal course of business, individuals working for Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) may
come into possession of significant, sensitive, confidential or proprietary information. In the eyes of the law, this information is considered the
Company’s property. Individuals working for the Company are entrusted with this information and have a duty to protect it against inappropriate
use or disclosure.
In addition, federal securities laws generally prohibit individuals from buying or selling securities of a public company while they possess
material non-public information (also called “inside information”) about that company. They are also prohibited from passing inside information
to others (which is called “tipping”). For purposes of these insider trading laws, securities include common stock as well as stock options and
certain debt securities. The laws apply to direct holdings, as well as indirect holdings, such as holdings through a family trust, and apply to
virtually any individual, including all individuals associated with the Company, if the information involved is “material” and “non-public.”
These terms are defined below.
Other federal securities laws are designed to ensure that the Company discloses inside information only through broad, non-discriminatory
distribution to the public. Regulation FD, which stands for Fair Disclosure, prohibits Company personnel from selectively disclosing inside
information to the investment community.
Violation of these laws can result in substantial legal consequences – including fines, civil penalties and imprisonment – being imposed on the
Company, on individual Covered Persons (as defined below), and on recipients of material non-public information.
Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to facilitate compliance with these laws by: (1) informing Covered Persons of their responsibilities; (2) establishing
procedures for certain Covered Persons to follow in connection with their trading in Company securities; and (3) informing Covered Persons of
the consequences of violating the law and this policy. The Company has adopted this policy to fulfill its obligation to prevent insider trading and
selective disclosure and to help Covered Persons avoid the severe consequences associated with violation of these laws.
If you have any questions regarding the application of this policy, please contact the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, who is the designated
compliance officer for purposes of this policy (the “Designated Compliance Officer”).

Scope
This insider trading policy applies to every director, officer, employee or agent of the Company (each, a “Covered Person”). It also applies to the
spouse, minor children, or other adults living in the same household, any family members who do not live in the same household but whose
transactions in stock or other securities of the Company are directed by such Covered Person or are subject to influence or control by such
Covered Person (collectively, “family members”). This policy applies to any and all transactions in the Company’s securities, including
transactions in common stock, restricted stock, derivative securities (such as put and call options and convertible debentures or preferred stock),
debt securities (such as debentures, bonds and notes), 401(k) plans, employee stock purchase plans, dividend reinvestment plans and any other
type of securities that the Company may issue.
Material Non-Public Information
Material Information. There is no bright line test for determining whether particular information is material. Such a determination depends on the
facts and circumstances unique to each situation, and cannot be made solely based on the potential financial impact of the information. In
general, information may be considered “material” if a reasonable investor would consider the information significant when deciding whether to
buy or sell Company securities, or the information, if disclosed, could be viewed by a reasonable investor as having significantly altered the total
mix of information available in the marketplace about the Company. It does not matter whether the information is positive, negative, favorable or
unfavorable. Simply put, any information which could reasonably be expected to affect the trading price of the Company’s common stock or
other securities is material information. Common examples of material information include the following:
•
annual, quarterly or monthly financial results;
•
a change in revenue or earnings or projections relating to either;
•
discussions, negotiations and agreements regarding a significant proposed or pending transaction, including a merger, acquisition,
business combination or tender offer;
•
a significant change in value or composition of the Company’s assets or liquidity;
•
a change in control of the Company;
•
planned changes in dividend or distribution policies;
•
declaration of a stock split, the initiation of a stock buy-back program or the offering of additional debt or equity securities;
•
a significant cybersecurity incident;
•
entering into significant new contracts or the non-performance or termination of a significant existing contract;
•
significant threatened claims, litigation, or governmental investigations;
•
an imminent change in the Company’s credit rating by a rating agency; or
•
top management changes.
This list is not exhaustive; other types of information may also be material.

Non-Public Information. Information is “non-public” if it has not been disseminated to investors through a widely circulated news or wire
service (such as Dow Jones, Bloomberg, PR Newswire, etc.) or through a public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). For the purposes of this Policy, information will be not considered public until the opening of regular trading on the New York Stock
Exchange (“NYSE”) on the second trading day after the Company’s widespread public release of the information.
Generally Prohibited Activities
Insider Trading. No Covered Person may buy, sell or otherwise trade in Company securities while aware of material non-public information
concerning the Company. No Covered Person may buy, sell or otherwise trade in Company securities during any special trading blackout period
applicable to such Covered Person as designated by the Designated Compliance Officer.
Tipping. Providing material non-public information to another person (such as family members, friends, relatives or business associates) who
may trade or advise others to trade on the basis of that information is known as “tipping” and is illegal. When “tipping” occurs, both the person
who discloses the information (called the “tipper”) and the person who receives the information (called the “tippee”) may be liable under the
insider trading laws. This liability applies even if a tipper derives no monetary benefit from the ultimate tippee’s trading activity. Therefore, each
Covered Person and his or her family members are prohibited from disclosing to third parties, without the Company’s authorization, any material
non-public information concerning the Company.
Giving Trading Advice. No Covered Person may give trading advice of any kind about the Company to anyone, whether or not such Covered
Person is aware of material non-public information about the Company, except that a Covered Person should advise other Covered Persons not
to trade if such trading might violate the law or this policy.
Inside Information About Other Publicly Traded Companies. The prohibitions on trading or tipping also apply to stock or other securities
(including options relating to such securities) issued by any other company – such as customers or competitors – if a Covered Person acquired or
possesses material non-public information relating to the other company in the course of his or her employment or affiliation with our Company.
No Short Sales, No Limit Orders Exceeding the Date When Placed. Covered Persons and their family members are prohibited from making any
short sales of the Company’s common stock or any other Company securities. Further, Covered Persons and their family members may not place
limit orders for shares of the Company’s common stock or such other securities that remain effective after the day on which they are placed (such
as “good until cancelled” orders).
No Trading in Options. Covered Persons and their family members are strictly prohibited from engaging in transactions in put options, call
options or other derivative securities of the Company’s common stock. A transaction in these kinds of options is, in effect, a bet on the short-term
movement of the Company’s common stock, and thus could create the appearance that the trading was based on inside information.
No Hedging Transactions. Covered Persons and their family members are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions involving Company
stock or securities (including prepaid variable forward contracts,

equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any
decrease in the market value of Company securities. Certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions (such as zero-cost collars and
forward sale contracts) allow a person to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential
upside appreciation in the stock. These transactions would allow a person to continue to own the covered securities, but without the full risks and
rewards of ownership. Thus, a person who engaged in these transactions would no longer have the same objectives as the Company’s
shareholders.
Margin Accounts and Pledges of Company Stock are Prohibited. Covered Persons and their family members are prohibited from purchasing
Company securities on margin, holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company stock as collateral for a loan, except in
connection with a broker assisted exercise and sale of stock when any loan is outstanding only until the sale is cleared (i.e., a so-called “cashless
option exercises”). Brokers may generally sell stock in a margin account without the customer’s consent if the customer fails to meet a margin
call. Similarly, securities pledged as collateral for a loan may be sold in foreclosure if the borrower defaults on the loan. Because these sales
could occur at a time when a Covered Person possesses material non-public information, a Covered Person cannot engage in these types of
transactions except in connection with a cashless exercise of stock options when any loan is outstanding only until the sale is cleared.
Interim Blackout Periods. Potentially material events or circumstances may from time to time require the Company to implement a Blackout
Period related to a specific event or set of circumstances, during which all trading in Company securities may be prohibited. The Company may
designate Covered Persons with access to material non-public information concerning that event or circumstances as being subject to a Blackout
Period. In that case, the Company will advise those Covered Persons that they are subject to a Blackout Period and will inform them when the
Blackout Period terminates. Covered Persons who are advised about the existence of a Blackout Period are prohibited from disclosing the
existence of the Blackout Period to any other person.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans. Covered Persons who adopt a pre-arranged trading plan may be able to effect certain transactions in the Company’s
stock or other securities even when trades would otherwise be prohibited by this policy. Any such trading plan must (i) satisfy the requirements
of the SEC’s Rule 10b5-1 (including specified waiting periods and limitations on multiple overlapping plans and single trade plans), and (ii) be
approved by the Designated Compliance Officer prior to establishing such plan. The Company’s directors and officers subject to Section 16 of
the Securities Exchange act of 1934 (collectively, “Section 16 Insiders”) should be aware that the Company will be required to make quarterly
disclosures regarding all Rule 10b5-1 Plans entered into, amended or terminated by Section 16 Insiders and to include the material terms of such
plans, other than pricing information. If you have questions about trading plans or wish to establish a trading plan, please contact the Designated
Compliance Officer.
Post-Employment or Other Relationship. This policy will continue to apply to Covered Persons after the termination of their employment or
other relationship with the Company. If your employment or other relationship terminates for any reason while you are in possession of material
non-public information or you are subject to a Blackout Period, you will continue to be subject to this policy until the Blackout Period ends or
until that information has become public or is no longer material, whichever is later.

Gifts of Securities
Gifts of securities may include gifts to trusts for estate planning purposes, as well as donations to a charitable organization. Covered Persons are
prohibited from making any gifts of Company securities during a Blackout Period. Depending on the circumstances, gifts of Company securities
should also be avoided while the person making the gift is aware of material nonpublic information. Accordingly, you are encouraged to consult
the Designated Compliance Officer when contemplating a gift.
Additional Restrictions Applicable to Restricted Persons and Section 16 Individuals
Trading Restrictions On Certain Company Insiders. The Company’s directors, officers, Designated Company Spokespersons (as defined below),
and any other Covered Person who regularly has access to material non-public information, as designated by the Designated Compliance Officer,
and the respective family members of each of the foregoing (collectively, “Restricted Persons”) are prohibited from trading in any Company
securities at any time, except during a Quarterly Window Period.
In addition to the rules set forth above, Section 16 Insiders are subject to certain additional rules governing their transactions in the Company’s
stock. Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Section 16 Insiders to disgorge any short-swing profits resulting from certain
opposite-way transactions within six months, e.g., purchases of Company stock within six months before or after a sale, or selling any stock
within six months before or after a purchase.
Although Section 16 is designed to prevent the abuse of inside information, it is an absolute rule, and therefore it applies whether or not a
Section 16 Insider actually possesses any material non-public information. Additionally, Section 16 Insiders are required to report their
ownership and transactions in Company securities to the SEC on certain forms. Section 16 Insiders should contact the Designated Compliance
Officer before they engage in any transaction involving Company stock, so that the information necessary to prepare these forms may be
obtained and it can be determined if there is any reason why the Section 16 Insider should not be trading in Company stock.
Quarterly Window Periods. A Quarterly Window Period will begin at the opening of regular trading on NYSE on the second trading day after the
Company publicly issues its full set of public financial results and performance measures for the prior quarter (e.g., a customary quarterly
earnings press release), and will end not later than the close of regular trading on the fifteenth calendar day of the third month of then-current
quarter (or if not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day). For example, if July 24  is a trading day and the Company issues its
customary quarterly earnings press release after the market close on July 24 , the related Quarterly Window Period would begin when regular
trading commences on July 26  (assuming July 26th is a trading day) and would end at the close of regular trading on September 15  (or if not a
trading day, the immediately preceding trading day). The Company reserves the right to from time to time adjust the commencement time/date
and the ending time/date of any Quarterly Window Period, both forward and backward.
Trading Pre-Clearances. Even during a Quarterly Window Period, all Restricted Persons, including family members, are required to obtain
written pre-clearance of any and all transactions (including, without limitation, gifts) in any Company securities with the Designated Compliance
Officer. Absent the receipt
th
th
th
th

of pre-clearance, transactions in Company stock and other securities by Restricted Persons and their family members are strictly prohibited.
Insider Trading Penalties and Disciplinary Actions
Surveillance. The SEC and the national securities exchanges in the U.S. have extensive surveillance facilities that are used to monitor trading in
stocks and stock options. Through these surveillance facilities, the SEC and major securities exchanges are able to identify unusual trading in
stocks and stock options that may be indicative of insider trading. Where this occurs, both informal and formal investigations may be launched
by a securities exchange and/or the SEC. The Company will cooperate with those investigations. Covered Persons should remember that if a
transaction in Company securities becomes the subject of scrutiny, the transaction will be viewed after the fact, with the full benefit of hindsight.
As a result, before engaging in any transaction involving Company securities, Covered Persons should carefully consider how regulators and
others might view the transaction in hindsight.
Civil and Criminal Penalties. The consequences of insider trading violations can be severe under U.S. law. The SEC takes the position that these
laws apply to all transactions in stock (including options) and other securities of companies listed for trading in the U.S., whether or not the
actual trades take place in the U.S. For individuals who trade on inside information (or tip information to others), penalties include:
1.
A civil penalty of disgorgement, or return, of profit gained or loss avoided, plus a fine of up to three times the profit gained or loss
avoided;
2.
A criminal fine (no matter how small the profit) of up to $5 million; and
3.
A jail term of up to 20 years.
In addition to civil and criminal penalties, persons contemporaneously trading at the time of a violation of the insider trading laws have the right
to sue the insider for an amount equal to the profit gained or loss avoided by the insider in such transaction, offset by any amounts the insider is
required to disgorge by the SEC.
For a company (as well as any supervisory person of a company) that fails to take appropriate steps to prevent illegal insider trading, penalties
include:
1.
A civil penalty of up to the greater of $2 million or three times the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of the employee’s violation;
and
2.
A criminal penalty of up to $25 million.
Company Discipline. Failure to comply with this policy may also subject Covered Persons to Company-imposed sanctions and disciplinary
action, including termination of employment for cause. Disciplinary actions could be imposed even in the absence of a criminal prosecution or a
violation of law.
Reporting of Violations. Any Covered Persons who violates this policy or any federal or state law governing insider trading or tipping, or knows
of any such violation by any other Insider, must report the violation immediately to the Designated Compliance Officer. Upon determining that
any such violation has occurred, the Designated Compliance Officer, in consultation with the Chair of the Audit Committee,

will determine whether the Company should release any material non-public information, and, when required by applicable law, shall cause the
Company to report the violation to the SEC or other appropriate governmental authority.
Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure).
Our policy is that disclosures of material non-public information about the Company (“inside information”) should be broadly disseminated via
the wire services, SEC filings or by other means reasonably designed to provide broad dissemination to the public, so that all investors have
prompt and fair access to information that might affect the price of the Company’s securities.
Violations of Regulation FD are subject to SEC enforcement action, which may include an administrative action seeking a cease-and-desist
order, or a civil action against the Company or an individual seeking an injunction and/or monetary penalties.
Designated Company Spokesperson. Designated Company Spokesperson means the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and any other person or job position named on a list of Designated Company Spokespersons that is maintained by the Company’s
Disclosure Committee. Designated Company Spokespersons (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) may be
authorized to speak for the Company only on specified topics.
Prohibited External Communications. No Covered Person should issue any external communication (including via “social media”) that includes
inside information, or authorize others to do so, unless that Covered Person is a Designated Company Spokesperson, or is authorized to do so on
that specific occasion by a Designated Company Spokesperson.
Communications with Investment Community. Material information about the Company should not be discussed with members of the
investment community (such as Company shareholders, financial analysts and financial news media representatives) or other external parties
unless that information has already been disclosed by the Company in a manner that satisfies Regulation FD. To further this policy, only
Designated Company Spokespersons are authorized to give interviews, make speeches, comment or respond on behalf of the Company to
members of the investment community. Other Covered Persons who receive inquiries from members of the investment community should refrain
from commenting on Company matters and should refer the inquirer to a Designated Company Spokesperson or to the Company’s investor
relations consultant.
Company Transactions
From time to time, the Company may engage in transactions in its own securities. It is the Company’s policy to comply with all applicable
securities and state laws (including appropriate approvals by the Board of Directors or appropriate committee, if required) when engaging in
transactions of its securities.
Limited Exceptions
Limited exceptions or waivers from this Policy can be granted subject to the approval of the Designated Compliance Officer. The Designated
Compliance Officer shall consult with the Board of Directors or an

independent committee thereof as the Designated Compliance Officer shall deem necessary or appropriate.
Administration
Compliance. Failure to observe this policy may result in serious legal difficulties for the involved Covered Person, as well as for the Company,
including the possibility of civil suits by stockholders.
Amendment. The Company reserves the right to amend, modify, terminate and/or replace this policy at any time and from time to time.
Questions. All questions and inquiries regarding this policy, the prevention of insider trading and compliance with Regulation FD should be
directed to the Designated Compliance Officer for purposes of this policy. If you are unsure about any aspect of this policy or its applicability to
you or any given transaction or situation, ask for guidance.
Effective February 20, 2025.

Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF KINSALE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
Subsidiary
  Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
Kinsale Insurance Company
  Arkansas
Kinsale Management, Inc.
  Delaware
Aspera Insurance Services, Inc.
  Virginia
Kinsale Real Estate, Inc.
  Delaware
2001 Maywill, LLC
  Delaware
2000 Maywill, LLC
Delaware

Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-267099) on Form S-3ASR and (No.333-212815) on Form S-8 of our
reports dated February 21, 2025, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Richmond, Virginia
February 21, 2025

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael P. Kehoe, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.
February 21, 2025
/s/ Michael P. Kehoe
Michael P. Kehoe
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Bryan P. Petrucelli, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.
February 21, 2025
/s/ Bryan P. Petrucelli
Bryan P. Petrucelli
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2024 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P. Kehoe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
February 21, 2025
/s/ Michael P. Kehoe
Michael P. Kehoe
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2024 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan P. Petrucelli, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
February 21, 2025
/s/ Bryan P. Petrucelli
Bryan P. Petrucelli
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)