Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / Ledyard Financial Group, Inc.

Ledyard Financial Group, Inc.

lfgp · OTC Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker lfgp
Exchange OTC
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2006 Annual Report · Ledyard Financial Group, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
A partnership in growth.

TABLE of CONTENTS

1

2

3

Financial Highlights

Letter from the President & Chair

Partnership, Growth & Community

10

Investment & Trust

LLEDYARD NATIONAL BANK’S SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM

Gregory D. Steverson, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Seated, from left:

Kathryn G. Underwood, President & CEO

14 Management’s Financial Discussion

Back, from left:

17

Independent Auditors’ Report

Darcy D. Rogers, Senior Vice President & Chief Operations Officer

18 Balance Sheets

19

Statement of Condition

22 Notes to Financial Statements

38 Directors, Officers, Boards & Staff

Photography by Jon Gilbert Fox

Martha P. Candon, Senior Vice President & Senior Retail Banking Officer 

D. Rodman Thomas, Senior Vice President & Senior Trust Officer

William B. Hamilton, Jr., President, Investment & Trust Services Division

Darlene E. Romano, Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Finance

Mark S. Clough, Senior Vice President & Senior Loan Officer

M

MISSION STATEMENT:

We at Ledyard National Bank are committed to being the financial

services institution of choice in each of the markets we serve by

providing our customers with outstanding products and services.

In order to accomplish this, we must have dedicated and capable

employees for whom we will provide a challenging and rewarding

work environment. As a direct result, we will provide our 

shareholders with consistent and superior returns over the long term.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Years-ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Financial Condition Data
Assets
Investments
Net Loans, including loans held for sale
Deposits
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
Shareholders’ Equity

Operating Data
Net Interest Income
Provision for Loan Loss
Non-interest Income
Non-interest Expense
Income Taxes
Net Income

Other Data
Earnings per Share, basic
Dividends per Share
Dividend Payout Ratio
Book Value per Share
Shares Outstanding
Return on Average Assets
Return on Average Equity
Equity to Asset Ratio
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Loans

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

$ 268,869
65,467
175,189
227,614
11,981
21,849

$

$
$

$

10,053
325
5,330
10,452
1,593
3,013

3.03
0.91
30%
21.96
994,895
1.20%
14.56%
8.13%
1.35%

$ 242,761
61,005
157,406
205,710
10,493
19,716

$

$
$

$

9,631
340
4,864
9,767
1,578
2,810

2.84
0.85
30%
19.92
990,679
1.17%
14.90%
8.12%
1.31%

$ 233,203
43,030
157,047
203,008
5,000
17,840

$

$
$

$

9,409
525
4,067
9,237
1,384
2,330

2.37
0.73
31%
18.15
983,519
1.06%
13.58%
7.66%
1.53%

$ 320,230
48,278
218,869
271,142
3,214
27,271

$

$
$

$

12,099
525
6,282
11,894
2,176
3,787

3.75
1.08
29%
26.99
1,010,246
1.31%
14.66%
8.52%
1.27%

$ 285,495
60,601
194,893
240,828
8,857
24,391

$

$
$

$

11,486
780
5,834
11,354
1,748
3,439

3.43
0.98
29%
24.16
1,009,746
1.25%
14.85%
8.54%
1.21%

1

Kathryn G. Underwood
President & CEO, Ledyard National Bank

Dennis E. Logue
Chair, Ledyard National Bank

TO OUR FELLOW OWNERS, OUR LOYAL CUSTOMERS and MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITIES:

TWe are pleased to report that 2006 was

another record-breaking year for Ledyard
National Bank. We achieved all-time highs
in total net income, earnings per share,
total assets, and book value per share. In
addition, our Investment & Trust Services
Division set new highs in assets under man-
agement, revenue, profit margin, and profits.
These and other positive results – many of
which are detailed elsewhere in this report
– were achieved in spite of an uncertain
environment for the banking industry.

Our goal continues to be to build share-
holder value by providing superior services in
all the communities we serve now and in the
future. We are placing our emphasis on both
growing our businesses organically in our
existing markets and seeking opportunities to
expand into places not yet served by us.

Our strategic plan calls for continuing
emphasis on providing awe-inspiring 
service to our clients. This will include
enhancing our technology to provide
greater customer security and convenience
and expanding our product offerings so 
as to meet all our customers’ banking
needs. We will also focus on increased
employee training to ensure that, in 
assisting and advising our clients, we are
providing them with the best solutions to
their planning needs in an increasingly
complex financial environment.

A significant step in 2006 toward meeting
those goals was the planning and ground-
breaking for the new headquarters for our 

Investment & Trust Services Division.
This new facility in downtown Hanover
will greatly enhance our efforts to expand
our product and service offerings for 
existing clients and gain the business of
many more individuals and organizations
in and beyond our current markets. The
grand opening for this wonderful new
building is scheduled to occur in the
fourth quarter of 2007. 

This major step is a key part of our effort
to continue double-digit growth in our
financial services business through our
current investment and trust programs and
new products and services. These and other
activities will ensure we remain innovative
in the businesses and markets we deem
critical to our future success. 

As we have previously reported, we
arranged in 2006 for Ledyard National
Bank stock to be bought and sold through
the NASD-sanctioned “Pink Sheets"
(www.pinksheets.com) under ticker symbol
LYNA. The national market for our stock
will result in increased liquidity for our
present and future shareholders. 

During 2006, Gregory D. Steverson
rejoined our senior management team as
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer.  In addition to applying
his considerable financial talents to the
operation of our bank, Greg will be 
coordinating our efforts to enhance our
shareholder communications in a number 

2

of ways, including increasing the 
information available to shareholders 
and others on Ledyard’s website. If you
would like to be added to our periodic 
e-mail communications, e-mail Greg 
at Greg.Steverson@Ledyardbank.com. 
Greg is also playing an active role in our
efforts to raise our visibility and market
share in the New London area where he
and his family reside.

We want to thank you for placing your
trust in all of us here at your bank as we
move forward to address future challenges
and opportunities. We will do all in our
power to continue to be deserving of that
trust. While circumstances change, our
goal remains as always: to build value for
our shareholders by providing our present
and future customers with “banking the
way it should be.”

We look forward to seeing many of you at
our Annual Meeting on April 13th and
answering any questions you may have for
us at that time. 

KATHRYN G. UNDERWOOD
President & Chief Executive Officer

DENNIS E. LOGUE
Chair 

LWe have a saying at Ledyard:

LEDYARD NATIONAL BANK: PARTNERSHIP, GROWTH and COMMUNITY

Our goal is to develop further 

“It’s not just banking. It’s banking

partnerships with more people who

the way it should be.” As we celebrate

will discover the benefits of working

our sixteenth anniversary in 2007,

with Ledyard. This means that we will

these words have even greater meaning

work even harder for our existing 

with all they imply. They are an

customers. We will always strive 

embodiment of our mission to deliver

to "raise the bar" to ensure that 

community banking that far exceeds

expectations are continually exceeded

what is expected.

and that new, higher standards are

consistently set.

We firmly believe that our growth

is a direct result of staying true to

We think that the people and

that mission. By building trusted

accompanying photographs featured

relationships. By offering exceptional

in this report will illustrate that

products that evolve based on the

Ledyard is more than just a bank. We

needs of our customers and the

are partners within the community

community. By delivering the kind

who share the same hopes and dreams

of extraordinary personalized service

for success. That is, after all, banking

that we, as customers, would want.

the way it should be.

“

Our mission is to deliver

the extraordinary personalized 

service that we, as customers, 

would want.

”

3

PICTURED ABOVE:

(from left to right) Martha Richardson of Stave Puzzles; 

Gail Broughton, Assistant Vice President and Regional 

Manager of Ledyard’s Lyme and Norwich offices;

and Steve Richardson, aka Stave’s “Owner and 

Chief Tormentor” surrounded by busy “elves” 

in the Stave Puzzles workshop.

4

“

Ledyard is working hard to make 

sure that all the financial pieces fit

perfectly together...

”
SSTAVE PUZZLES COUNTS on LEDYARD to FIT the PIECES TOGETHER

Steve Richardson’s official title is “Owner and Chief Tormentor” at Stave Puzzles in Wilder, Vermont.

He and his wife and business partner, Martha Richardson, have been handcrafting delightful and diabolically

clever wooden puzzles since 1974. They have gained a fan base around the world, including such luminaries

as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth and Bill Gates.

Stave Puzzles has grown over the years as a result of staying true to their craft and by never

compromising on quality. Their designs are developed with hand-drawn illustrations, and each piece        

is meticulously hand-cut from fine hardwoods on a saw with delicate blades. Stave’s web site describes

their profession as “world class service from down-home people,” a sentiment with which many of their

customers agree. 

According to Steve and Martha, this is the same philosophy they had hoped to find in a bank. When

Ledyard opened an office in Norwich, Vermont, they were definitely intrigued. “A small business like ours needs

a bank that understands who we are,” says Steve. Ultimately, when they began working with Gail Broughton

and her knowledgeable staff in Norwich, this is exactly the kind of bank they discovered. Gail coordinates a team

of experts who work together to deliver financial solutions tailored specifically to their customers.

Today, the Richardsons count on Ledyard for all their business and personal banking needs, including

investment and retirement planning. It’s a true partnership between local, community-based people. Ledyard

is working hard to make sure that all the financial pieces fit perfectly together for them and for their

business – and that the solution is always easy. 

5

PICTURED ABOVE:

Terry Appleby, General Manager of the Co-op Food Stores 

in Hanover and Lebanon, surrounded by his favorite produce.

6

“

It’s all about working together.

It’s all about community.

”

TTHE CO-OP and LEDYARD: IT’S ALL ABOUT COMMUNITY

The Hanover Consumer Co-operative Society dates back to 1936. Then a small group of

community residents pooled their orders for produce and arranged for discounts on gasoline and fuel oil with local

suppliers for the benefit of the entire group. Seventy years later, the Co-op has grown to over 30,000 members

and operates the Co-op Food Stores in Hanover and Lebanon, as well as an automotive service center in Hanover. 

According to General Manager Terry Appleby, the Co-op maintains strong relationships with its   

members, customers, local vendors and the community. “Our strong ties to the local community fit so well with

Ledyard’s role as a community bank. Doing business with them was a natural,” says Terry. The Co-op has been

banking with Ledyard almost since the Bank’s founding for everything from checking, money market and

overnight investment accounts to business loans and lines of credit.

Since the Co-op generates a high volume of sales, they also require a loan officer who understands their

needs and takes a proactive approach. Mike Sandoe, Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer for Ledyard,

works closely with Terry and his team to deliver just that. Terry adds, “Mike regularly checks in to see how

Ledyard can help our business and is quick to follow up when we have questions or requests.”

Mike believes that Ledyard is uniquely suited to help the Co-op achieve its goals because both

organizations are deeply committed to the communities and the people they serve. It’s a symbiotic relationship

that goes beyond “bottom-line” success. It’s all about working together. It’s all about community. 

7

PICTURED ABOVE ON THE FRONT PORCH

OF THE NORWICH INN:

(Seated on the rocking chairs in front) Former Owners 

Tim Wilson and Sally Wilson;

(In back, from left to right) Innkeepers Jason Gershon 

and Tiffany Gershon; Current Owners Jill Lavin and 

Joe Lavin. Also posing nicely for the camera are furry

friends Porter & Mason.

8

“

A lot of hard work was involved to

grow the Inn to 27 rooms, a fine

restaurant and a renowned brewpub.

Ledyard was there for them every

step of the way.

”
TTHE NORWICH INN and LEDYARD WELCOME NEW OWNERS  to the NEIGHBORHOOD

When Tim and Sally Wilson, then the owners of The Norwich Inn in Norwich, Vermont, contacted Kevin

Raleigh, they knew a good banker when they met one. Tim was a former banker, and he and Sally had known

Kevin, now Senior Vice President and Senior Commercial Loan Officer at Ledyard, for years. The couple needed

a bank that could help them grow their business into one of Vermont’s most popular historic inns. That Ledyard’s

Norwich office is located directly across the street was just icing on the cake.

Unlike a hotel, an inn is more personal, and Tim and Sally made every guest feel like family. A lot of

hard work was involved to grow the Inn to 27 rooms in three historic buildings (the main building dates back to

1890), a fine restaurant and a renowned brewpub. Ledyard was there for them every step of the way.

Joe Lavin had been a guest many times at The Norwich Inn when he visited his son, a Dartmouth

student. He and wife Jill loved staying at the Inn – so much so, that Joe, a former Marriott International

Executive Vice President, made an offer to buy the business from Tim and Sally. It took a bit of convincing,

and after much thought, the Wilsons agreed. 

Joe, along with partner Steve Barrett, wanted to maintain the high standards and fine reputation 

of the Inn. They also wanted a knowledgeable, full-service bank that thoroughly understood the nuances of 

their business. Whom did they turn to for financing? Kevin Raleigh and Ledyard. Joe recognized the 

importance of Ledyard’s ties to the Inn and to the community and found that the entire financing process 

couldn’t have been easier.

Today, innkeepers Jason and Tiffany Gershon are carrying on The Norwich Inn tradition of fine

hospitality, making their guests feel at home. They, in turn, feel quite at home at their bank right across Main

Street where their dog, Mason, always gets a treat.

9

William B. Hamilton, Jr.
President,
Investment & Trust Services Division

ITo Our Shareholders:

INVESTMENT & TRUST SERVICES

Ledyard’s Investment & Trust Services

1.  We have had very strong investment 

Our new facility will include expanded

Division had an outstanding year in 2006.

results.

Our growth and financial performance

have been extraordinary. As of December 31,

2006, the Division held assets with an

aggregate market value of $665 million.

2.  We provide individualized investment 

planning with a careful eye toward future

income needs, including retirement.

client meeting areas, safe deposit boxes, 

an ATM, and ample on-site parking. 

We believe that our new headquarters 

will be further confirmation of our 

dedication to our present and future

This represents an increase of $80 million,

3.  We help our clients coordinate their 

clients and our commitment to the 

or 13.7%, since the end of 2005. This

financial, tax and estate planning.

communities we have the pleasure and

growth was due to a strong flow of new

accounts and stock market appreciation.

The Division's revenue was 15.4% 

greater than in 2005, and our net pre-tax

profit in 2006 exceeded our 2005 result 

by an impressive 37.9%. 

I believe our growth can be attributed 

to several key factors:

4.  We build warm, long-term relation-

privilege to serve.

ships with our clients – relationships 

We in the Investment & Trust Services

that can be especially important to 

Division are very proud of our strong

surviving spouses, children and 

performance in 2006, and we look 

grandchildren.

forward to contributing to Ledyard’s

In late 2006, we announced that our

continued success.

Division will be relocating its headquarters

Thank you for your support. 

in the fourth quarter of 2007 to a beautiful

new building currently under construction

at 2 Maple Street in downtown Hanover. 

William B. Hamilton, Jr.
President, 
Investment & Trust Services Division 

10

LLedyard’s Investment & Trust

LEDYARD INVESTMENT and TRUST SERVICES

accurate and comprehensive record

Services Division offers a full com-

keeping, periodic statements, and 

plement of investment management,

a comprehensive annual summary 

fiduciary and custody services. 

of tax information. 

As investment managers, we help our

We offer both prospective and current

clients define their investment goals,

clients an unusual and powerful

risk tolerance and time horizon. We

investment tool: a comprehensive

help establish investment strategy,

review of a prospective or current

portfolio design and asset allocation.

client’s total investment picture.

We also provide continuing portfolio

For the prospective client, this

management, including periodic

review represents an excellent first

meetings with account officers. 

step toward establishing a successful

As corporate fiduciary, we serve as

trustee or co-trustee for revocable

trusts, irrevocable trusts and Individual

Retirement Accounts. As custodian,

we provide securities safekeeping,

working partnership with our

organization. For the current client,

this review represents a basis for

careful, strategic coordination across

multiple investment accounts.

ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT  
or CUSTODY
(dollars in thousands)

GROSS REVENUE
(dollars in thousands)

$700,000

600,000

500,000

400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

$4,500

4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

02

03

04

05

06

02

03

04

05

06

11

     
PICTURED ABOVE:

Chandler and Debra Perkins enjoying the peaceful

tranquility of their New London home along with

their trusty companion, Tucker.

12

“

The trust that brings peace of mind

over the long term is the most 

important benefit we can provide 

at Ledyard.

”
CCHANDLER and DEBRA PERKINS PLACE THEIR TRUST in LEDYARD

To say that Debra and Chandler Perkins and their extended family are connected to their community is an

understatement. The property where the Perkins have their home in New London, New Hampshire, has been in

the family since 1907. A cottage was built on the spot in 1935. Chandler and Debra also founded the New London

Agency, now the town’s largest and best-known real estate and insurance agency, celebrating its 50th anniversary.

The Perkins certainly understand financial matters, having grown a successful business that their

children now operate. Chandler Perkins also served on the Board of New London Trust where he met Bill

Hamilton, now President of Ledyard’s Investment & Trust Services Division with an office in New London –

another connection.

“They know our family and make the family part of the planning,” says Chandler about Bill, J.T.

Underwood, Jennifer Goin and the Ledyard Investment & Trust staff. That personal connection is important to

them. Equally important, Ledyard has a high level of expertise along with the ability to help them understand the

entire process. 

Debra and Chandler say it gives them a good feeling to know that they have someone whom they can trust

to manage their interests. That trust brings peace of mind over the long term, and that is the most important

benefit we can provide at Ledyard.

13

Gregory D. Steverson,
Executive Vice President 
& Chief Financial Officer

MReview of Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

The discussion and analysis that follows

focuses on the factors affecting the Bank’s

financial condition at December 31, 2006

and 2005 and its results of operations for

the years ended December 31, 2006 and

2005. The Financial Statements and Notes

to the Financial Statements should be read

in conjunction with this review.

Statement of Income

Net income was $3,786,919, or $3.75 per

share for the twelve months ended 2006 as

compared to $3,438,532, or $3.43 per share

for 2005, an increase of $348,387, or 10.13%.

Increased net interest income and higher

Interest and fees on loans totaled

$79,290, or 11.34% for the year ended

$14,185,722 for the year ended December

December 31, 2006 totaling $778,779 as

31, 2006, as compared to $11,523,247 for

compared to $699,489 at December 31,

2005. This increase of $2,662,475, or

2005. This difference was due primarily to

23.11%, was due to an increase in loan

the increase in borrowings from securities

balances and increases in the prime rate

sold under repurchase agreements.

and other rates, which had a positive

impact on adjustable rate loans and resulted

in an overall increase in the yields on

loans. Investment income for the year

ended December 31, 2006, totaled

$2,820,087 as compared to $2,580,510 for

2005, an increase of $239,577, or 9.28%.

The increase was due primarily to higher

average balances in fed funds sold and 

certificates of deposit. 

During 2006, the Bank added $525,000 to

its provision for loan losses and realized

net charge-offs of $124,234, resulting in

an allowance for loan losses totaling

$2,784,125 on December 31, 2006, or

1.27%, of total loans. The determination

of an appropriate level of allowance for

loan losses (the “allowance”), and subsequent

provision for loan losses, which would

affect earnings, is based on management’s

Investment & Trust Services Division revenue

The Bank’s interest expense on deposits was

judgment of the adequacy of the allowance

accounted for the majority of the change.

$4,127,673 for the year ended December

based on analysis of various economic factors

Net interest income before the provision for

loan loss totaled $12,099,357 for the year

ended December 31, 2006, as compared to

$11,486,166 for the year ended December

31, 2005. The increase of $613,191 or

5.34% was primarily attributable to an

increase in interest income on loans. 

31, 2006, as compared to $1,918,102 for

and review of the Bank’s loan portfolio,

the year ended December 31, 2005, an

which may change due to numerous factors.

increase of $2,209,571. This increase was

Non-performing loans are examined on an 

the result of rising rates, as well as increases

individual basis to determine the estimated

in deposit volumes, which affected the 

probable loss on these loans. In addition,

cost of deposits, primarily money market

the ongoing evaluation process includes 

accounts and time deposits. Interest

a formal analysis of the allowance each

expense on borrowed funds increased

quarter. Management believes that the

14

TOTAL ASSETS
(dollars in thousands)

NET LOANS
including loans held for sale
(dollars in thousands)

TOTAL DEPOSITS
(dollars in thousands)

$350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

$350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

$350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

02

03

04

05

06

02

03

04

05

06

02

03

04

05

06

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION  (continued)

allowance at December 31, 2006 was 

Financial Condition

maturities and paydowns of available- 

appropriate given the current economic

conditions in the Bank’s service area.

At year-end, total assets were $320,229,558

compared to $285,495,434 at December

for-sale securities and held-to-maturity

securities totaling $20,114,484. 

Non-interest income totaled $6,282,237 in

31, 2005, an increase of $34,734,124, or

The Bank provides loans to customers 

2006 as compared to $5,834,064 in 2005,

12.17%. The change in assets consisted

primarily located within its geographic

an increase of $448,173, or 7.68%. Income

primarily of an increase of $23,975,934 in

market area. Net loans, including loans

from the Bank’s Investment & Trust

net loans, including loans held for sale and

held for sale, totaled $218,868,531 at

Services Division totaled $4,410,810, up

by a $13,172,126 increase in fed funds

December 31, 2006, a $23,975,934, or a

from $3,821,071 in 2005, an increase of

sold, certificates of deposit and investment

12.30% increase from a year ago. This

$589,739, or 15.43%. This increase was

securities (“investments”).

reflects the strong loan growth experienced

primarily attributable to increases in assets

under management and market conditions.

Service fees decreased slightly by $38,454

as the Bank continued to see growth in its

free checking NOW account product. 

The Bank maintains investments in fed

funds sold, certificates of deposit and

in the commercial and residential real

estate loan portfolios. 

investment securities in order to diversify

Commercial loans consist of (i) loans

its revenue, as well as to provide interest

secured by various corporate assets, 

rate and credit risk diversification. These

(ii) loans to provide working capital in 

Non-interest expense totaled $11,894,164

investments also provide for liquidity and

the form of secured and unsecured lines 

for 2006 as compared to $11,353,708 in

funding needs. As mentioned above, total

of credit, and (iii) commercial real estate

2005, an increase of $540,456, or 4.76%. 

investments increased $13,172,126, or

loans secured by income-producing 

Salaries and benefits expense increased as

19.26%. This increase consisted of

commercial real estate. The Bank focuses

the Bank continued to realize expenses

increases to fed funds sold of $2,870,426,

on lending to financially sound small-

associated with its management reorgani-

certificates of deposit of $22,000,000,

and medium-sized business customers

zation. Occupancy and equipment

securities available for sale of $6,706,810

within its geographic marketplace. Total

decreased slightly, and other general and

and a decrease in securities held to maturity

commercial loans increased by $6,905,425,

administrative expenses increased by 3.68%

of $18,405,110. During 2006, the Bank

or 5.64%, during 2006. 

due to various third-party expenses.

purchased $8,318,601 of available-for-sale

securities and realized proceeds from

15

BOOK VALUE 
PER SHARE
(in dollars)

NET INCOME
(dollars in thousands)

EARNINGS PER SHARE
(in dollars)

$30

25

20

15

10

5

$4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

$4.00

3.50

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

02

03

04

05

06

02

03

04

05

06

02

03

04

05

06

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION  (concluded)

Residential real estate loans consist of

Deposits continue to represent the Bank’s

the investment portfolio and residential

loans secured by one- to four-family 

primary source of funds. In 2006, total

loan portfolio provide a significant amount

residences. The Bank usually retains

deposits increased by $30,314,589, or

of contingent liquidity that could be accessed

adjustable-rate mortgages in its portfolio

12.59% over 2005, ending the year at

in a reasonable time period through sales if

and will generally sell fixed-rate mortgages.

$271,142,194. Comparing year-end 

needed. The Bank believes that the level of

Residential real estate loans increased by

balances in 2006 to 2005, demand deposits

liquidity is sufficient to meet current and

$14,099,819, or 20.93%, in 2006. During

increased by $1,663,997, certificates of

future funding requirements.

2006, the Bank sold approximately $19

deposit increased by $12,280,476, money

million of fixed-rate residential mortgage

market and savings accounts increased 

loans into the secondary market.

by $25,385,157 and NOW accounts

Consumer loans are originated by the

decreased by $9,015,041. 

Shareholders’ equity was $27,270,995 on

December 31, 2006 compared to

$24,391,136 on December 31, 2005, an

increase of $2,879,859. The increase was

Bank for a wide variety of purposes

Borrowings supplement deposits as a

primarily attributable to net income of

designed to meet the needs of its 

source of liquidity. In addition to borrowings

$3,786,919 less $1,090,526 in cash 

customers. Consumer loans include 

from the Federal Home Loan Bank

dividends to the Bank’s shareholders. The

overdraft protection, automobile, boat,

(FHLB), the Bank purchases federal funds,

Bank’s book value on December 31, 2006

recreational vehicles, home equity, and

and sells securities under agreements to

was $26.99 per share based on 1,010,246

secured and unsecured personal loans.

repurchase. Total borrowings were

shares outstanding, an increase of $2.83

Consumer loans increased by $2,555,065,

$20,603,624 at December 31, 2006 

per share, or 11.71% from a year earlier.

or 38.23%, in 2006. 

compared to $19,116,913 at December 31,

Premises and equipment totaled

$8,644,308 at December 31, 2006 as 

compared to $8,878,154 at December 31,

2005. The net decrease of $233,846, or

2.63%, can be attributed to depreciation

during 2006. 

2005, an increase of $1,486,711. The

majority of the borrowings were related 

to securities sold under agreements to

repurchase followed by advances from 

the FHLB. In addition to the liquidity 

sources discussed above, the Bank believes

16

I

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors & Shareholders of Ledyard National Bank:

We have audited the accompanying

auditing standards. Those standards

presentation. We believe our audits 

balance sheets of Ledyard National Bank

require that we plan and perform the 

provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and

audit to obtain reasonable assurance 

In our opinion, the financial 

the related statements of income, changes

about whether the financial statements 

statements referred to above present fairly,

in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for

are free of material misstatement. An 

in all material respects, the financial 

the years then ended. These financial

audit includes examining, on a test basis, 

position of Ledyard National Bank as of

statements are the responsibility of the

evidence supporting the amounts and 

December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the

Bank’s management. Our responsibility 

disclosures in the financial statements. 

results of its operations and its cash flows

is to express an opinion on these financial

An audit also includes assessing the

for the years then ended in conformity

statements based on our audits. 

accounting principles used and significant

with U.S. generally accepted accounting

We conducted our audits in accor-

estimates made by management, as well as

principles.

dance with U.S. generally accepted 

evaluating the overall financial statement 

Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker

Portland, Maine

February 15, 2007

17

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold
Certificates of deposit

Total cash and cash equivalents

Securities available-for-sale
Securities held-to-maturity

Nonmarketable equity securities

Loans held for sale

Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,784,125

in 2006 and $2,383,359 in 2005 

Accrued interest receivable 

Bank premises and equipment, net

Other assets

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits

Demand
NOW accounts
Money market accounts
Savings
Time, $100,000 and over
Other time

Total deposits

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

2006

2005

$

7,269,808
12,375,208
22,000,000

$

8,735,319
9,504,782
–

41,645,016

18,240,101

19,704,071
27,480,904

1,092,650

1,602,750

12,997,261
45,886,014

1,717,850

862,750

217,265,781

194,029,847

1,081,957

8,644,308

1,712,121

1,099,791

8,878,154

1,783,666

$ 320,229,558

$

285,495,434

$

42,854,164
46,961,342
104,629,163
13,562,961
26,176,118
36,958,446
271,142,194

17,389,539
3,214,085
1,212,745

$

41,190,167
55,976,383
76,624,027
16,182,940
24,352,485
26,501,603
240,827,605

10,259,834
8,857,079
1,159,780

Total liabilities

292,958,563

261,104,298

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15)

Shareholders’ equity

Common stock, $1.00 par value; 5,500,000 shares authorized;
1,010,246 and 1,009,746 shares issued and outstanding
in 2006 and 2005, respectively

Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Total shareholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18

1,010,246
9,279,378
17,066,764

(85,393)  

1,009,746
9,214,466
14,370,371
(203,447)

27,270,995

24,391,136

$ 320,229,558

$

285,495,434

STATEMENTS of INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

Interest and dividend income
Interest and fees on loans
Investment securities
Other interest-earning assets

Total interest and dividend income

Interest expense
Deposits
Borrowed funds

Total interest expense

Net interest income

Provision for loan losses

2006

2005

$

14,185,722
2,049,556
770,531

$

11,523,247
2,348,439
232,071

17,005,809

14,103,757

4,127,673
778,779

4,906,452

1,918,102
699,489

2,617,591

12,099,357

11,486,166

525,000

780,000

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

11,574,357

10,706,166

4,410,810
1,407,541
463,886

6,282,237

6,385,375
1,884,207
3,624,582

3,821,071
1,445,995
566,998

5,834,064

5,969,382
1,888,213
3,496,113

11,894,164

11,353,708

5,962,430

2,175,511

3,786,919

3.75
3.73
1,009,788

$

$
$

$

$
$

5,186,522

1,747,990

3,438,532

3.43
3.41
1,002,958

Noninterest income

Trust department income
Service fees
Other

Total noninterest income

Noninterest expense

Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Other general and administrative

Total noninterest expense

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average numbers of shares outstanding

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

19

STATEMENTS of CHANGES in SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2004

$

994,895 $ 8,951,476 $ 11,916,367 $

(14,081) $ 21,848,657

COMMON
STOCK

ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL

ACCUMULATED
OTHER
RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
EARNINGS

TOTAL

Comprehensive income

Net income

Change in unrealized loss on interest
rate protection agreement, net
of tax of $10,371

Change in net unrealized appreciation
on securities available-for-sale, net 
of tax of $107,921

Total comprehensive income

Cash dividends paid, $0.98 per share

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

3,438,532

–

3,438,532

–

–

20,131

20,131

(209,497)

(209,497)

3,438,532

(189,366)

3,249,166

(984,528)

–

–

( 984,528)

277,841

Stock warrants exercised, 14,851 shares

14,851

262,990

–

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2005

$ 1,009,746 $ 9,214,466 $ 14,370,371 $

(203,447) $ 24,391,136

Comprehensive income

Net income

Change in net unrealized depreciation
on securities available-for-sale, net 
of tax of $60,815

Total comprehensive income

Cash dividends paid, $1.08 per share

Fair value of stock warrants vested 

during the year

–

–

–

–

–

Stock warrants exercised, 500 shares

500

–

3,786,919

–

3,786,919

–

118,054

118,054

3,786,919

118,054

3,904,973

–

–

–

(1,090,526)

–

–

–

(1,090,526)

56,487

8,925

56,487

8,425

–

–

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2006

$ 1,010,246 $ 9,279,378 $ 17,066,764 $

(85,393) $ 27,270,995

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20

STATEMENTS of CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash 

provided by operating activities

Depreciation and amortization
Provision for loan losses
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
Fair value of stock warrants vested during the year
Decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
Decrease (increase) in other assets
Net (increase) decrease in loans held for sale
Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities

held-to-maturity

Purchase of securities held-to-maturity
Net redemption (purchase) of FHLB stock
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
Net increase in loans to customers
Purchase of bank premises and equipment

Net cash used by investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities 

Net increase in deposits
Proceeds from long-term FHLB borrowings
Repayment of long-term FHLB borrowings
Net increase in securities sold under agreements

to repurchase

Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants
Cash dividends paid on common stock

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

Supplementary cash flow information:

Interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds

Income taxes paid

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

21

2006

2005

$

3,786,919

$

3,438,532

709,015
525,000
(163,200)
56,487
17,834
52,965
173,930
(740,000)
4,418,950

554,223
780,000
53,900
–
(157,247)
4,495
(497,238)
832,218
5,008,883

1,776,694

2,156,552

18,337,790
–
625,200
(8,318,601)
(23,760,934)
(393,882)
(11,733,733)

30,314,589
2,000,000
(7,642,995)

7,129,705
8,925
(1,090,526)
30,719,698

20,433,674
(12,960,555)
(7,149)
(4,973,848)
(21,316,049)
(200,024)
(16,867,399)

13,213,955
2,000,000
(5,123,772)

3,989,623
277,841
(984,528)
13,373,119

23,404,915

1,514,603

18,240,101

16,725,498

$

41,645,016

$

$

4,817,250

2,355,371

$

$

$

18,240,101

2,579,413

1,326,000

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

NATURE OF BUSINESS

Ledyard National Bank (the Bank) is headquartered in Norwich, Vermont and provides a variety of financial services to individual

and business customers through its office locations in central New Hampshire and Vermont. The Bank’s principal business activity

is retail and commercial banking and investment and trust services which are provided through its seven branch locations in New

Hampshire and Vermont.

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies of the Bank are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and general practices with-

in the banking industry. The following is a description of the more significant policies.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make

estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities

at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results

could differ from those estimates.  

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance

for loan losses and the valuation of other real estate owned. In connection with the determination of the allowance, management

obtains independent appraisals for collateral securing significant loans. Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial por-

tion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in local market conditions.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based

on changes in local economic conditions.  In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodi-

cally review the Bank’s allowance for losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance

based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk

The  Bank’s  operations  are  affected  by  various  risk  factors,  including  interest  rate  risk,  credit  risk,  and  risk  from  geographic 

concentration of lending activities. Management attempts to manage interest rate risk through various asset/liability management

techniques designed to match maturities of assets and liabilities. Loan policies and administration are designed to provide assurance

that loans will only be granted to creditworthy borrowers, although credit losses are expected to occur because of subjective factors

beyond the control of the Bank. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio and economic conditions are stable, most of its

lending  activities  are  conducted  within  the  geographic  area  where  it  is  located.  As  a  result,  the  Bank  and  its  borrowers  may  be 

especially vulnerable to the consequences of changes in the local economy. In addition, a substantial portion of the Bank’s loans are

secured by real estate.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and 

certificates of deposit.

The Bank’s due from bank accounts, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Bank has not experienced any losses in such

accounts. The Bank believes it is not exposed to any significant risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Investment Securities

Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at

cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the period to call or maturity using methods approximating

the interest method. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values,

22

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Investment Securities (concluded)

are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Nonmarketable equity securities, consisting of stock in the Federal

Home  Loan  Bank  and  Federal  Reserve  Bank,  are  carried  at  cost  and  evaluated  for  impairment.  Unrealized  gains  and  losses  on 

securities  available-for-sale  are  reported  as  a  net  amount  in  other  comprehensive  income  or  loss,  net  of  tax.  Cost  of  securities  is 

recognized using the specific identification method.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate.

Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income.

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are stated at the

amount of unpaid principal, reduced by deferred loan fees and an allowance for loan losses.

Loans past due 30 days or more are considered delinquent. Management is responsible to initiate immediate collection efforts to

minimize delinquency and any eventual adverse impact on the Bank.

In general, consumer loans will be charged off if the loan is delinquent for 120 consecutive days. Commercial and real estate loans

are charged off in part or in full if they are considered uncollectible.

Loans considered to be impaired are reduced to the present value of expected future cash flows or to the fair value of collateral, by

allocating a portion of the allowance for loan losses to such loans. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require

an  increase,  such  increase  is  reported  as  provision  for  loan  losses.  Small  balance  homogeneous  loans  are  collectively  evaluated 

for impairment. 

Loan  interest  income  is  accrued  daily  on  the  outstanding  balances.  Accrual  of  interest  is  discontinued  when  a  loan  is  specifically 

determined  to  be  impaired  or  management  believes,  after  considering  collection  efforts  and  other  factors,  that  the  borrower’s 

financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any unpaid interest previously accrued on those loans is reversed

from income. Interest income is generally not recognized on specific impaired loans unless the likelihood of further loss is remote.

Interest payments received on such loans are generally applied as a reduction of the loan principal balance. Interest income on other

nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest payments received. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the

principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct origination costs are being deferred and the net amount amortized as an

adjustment of the related loan’s yield. The Bank is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent

in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio,

including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, and economic

conditions. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of estimated cash

flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries.

Credit Related Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit

card arrangements, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit.  Such financial instruments are recorded when they

are funded.

23

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate properties acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at the lower of the Bank’s carrying amount

or  fair  value  less  estimated  selling  cost  at  the  date  of  foreclosure.  Any  write-downs  based  on  the  asset’s  fair  value  at  the  date  of 

acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. 

After  foreclosure,  these  assets  are  carried  at  the  lower  of  their  new  cost  basis  or  fair  value  less  cost  to  sell.  Costs  of  significant 

property  improvements  are  capitalized,  whereas  costs  relating  to  holding  property  are  expensed.  Valuations  are  periodically 

performed by management, and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the car-

rying value of a property to the lower of its cost or fair value less cost to sell.

Bank Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The provision for depreciation

is  computed  over  the  estimated  useful  life  of  the  related  asset,  principally  by  the  straight-line  method.  Improvements  to  leased 

property are amortized over the lesser of the term of the lease or life of the improvements.

Income Taxes

The Bank recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are

established for the temporary differences between the book bases and the tax bases of the Bank’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax

rates expected to be in effect when the amounts related to such temporary differences are realized or settled. Adjustments to the

Bank’s deferred tax assets are recognized as deferred income tax expense or benefit based on management’s judgment relating to the

realizability of such assets.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share data is computed based on the weighted average number of the Bank’s common shares outstanding during

the year. Potential common stock is considered in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per

share, and is determined using the treasury stock method.

Stock Warrant Plans

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123

(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123(R) requires entities issuing stock options in exchange for services to measure the

fair value of the options at the grant date and to recognize the fair value of those options as expense, generally over the period in

which they vest. On January 1, 2006 the Bank adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) using a modified prospective application.

Using  this  application,  SFAS  No.  123(R)  applies  to  options  granted  or  modified  in  periods  beginning  after  December  15,  2005.

Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of outstanding options for which requisite service has not been rendered as of the

effective date shall be recognized as the service is rendered on or after the effective date. The proforma effect of expensing stock 

warrants in 2005 would have been to reduce net income by $30,077.

Trust Assets and Fees

Assets  held  by  the  trust  department,  other  than  trust  cash  on  deposit  at  the  Bank,  are  not  included  in  these  financial  statements

because they are not assets of the Bank. Trust fees are recorded on the accrual basis.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Bank uses an interest rate protection agreement (cap) as a cash flow hedge to eliminate the cash flow exposure of interest rate

movements on borrowings. The premium paid for the cap is amortized over its life. Any cash payments received are recorded as an 

24

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (concluded)

Derivative Financial Instruments (concluded)

adjustment to net interest income. The cap is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge, and thus is recorded at fair value. Changes

in fair value are recorded as a component of comprehensive income. The notional amount of the Bank’s cap was $5,000,000 and the

fair value was $0 at December 31, 2005. The cap matured in 2006.

Comprehensive Income

Accounting  principles  generally  require  that  recognized  revenue,  expenses,  gains  and  losses  be  included  in  net  income.  Although 

certain  changes  in  assets  and  liabilities,  such  as  unrealized  gains  and  losses  on  available-for-sale  securities  and  the  interest  rate 

protection agreement, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net

income, are components of comprehensive income.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2005 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation.

2. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS 

The  Bank  is  required  to  maintain  certain  reserves  of  vault  cash  or  deposits  with  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank.  The  amount  of  this 

reserve  requirement,  included  in  cash  and  due  from  banks,  was  approximately  $138,000  and  $385,000  as  of  December  31,  2006 

and 2005, respectively.

3. SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, follow: 

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
Mortgage-backed securities
State and municipal

Total securities available-for-sale

Securities Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Mortgage-backed securities

2006

AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

$

$

$

$ 9,093,883
10,111,278
628,293

$ 19,833,454

$ 1,982,429
2,629,817
853,923
22,014,735

23,863
42,454
3,456

69,773

–
8,000
–
10,589

$

$

$

(33,244)
(165,912)
–

$ 9,084,502
9,987,820
631,749

(199,156)

$ 19,704,071

(19,506)
(2,557)
(27,308)
(599,579)

$ 1,962,923
2,635,260
826,615
21,425,745

Total securities held-to-maturity

$ 27,480,904

$

18,589

$

(648,950)

$ 26,850,543

25

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

3. SECURITIES (continued)

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
Mortgage-backed securities

Total securities available-for-sale

Securities Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Mortgage-backed securities

2005

AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

$

$

$

$

4,981,879
8,323,634

$ 13,305,513

$ 14,455,872
3,140,986
1,030,747
27,258,409

–
–

–

–
15,022
–
19,901

$

$

$

(55,779)
(252,473)

$ 4,926,100
8,071,161

(308,252)

$ 12,997,261

(95,261)
(9,763)
(28,616)
(765,364)

$ 14,360,611
3,146,245
1,002,131
26,512,946

Total securities held-to-maturity

$ 45,886,014

$

34,923

$

(899,004)

$ 45,021,933

At  December  31,  2006  and  2005,  securities  with  a  carrying  value  of  $29,883,423  and  $18,616,355,  respectively,  were  pledged  to

secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. 

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2006 follow:

Within one year
Over one year through five years
Over five years through ten years
Over ten years

Collateralized mortgage obligations and 

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE

HELD-TO-MATURITY

AMORTIZED
COST

FAIR
VALUE

AMORTIZED
COST

FAIR
VALUE

$ 3,996,743
5,097,140
628,293
–
9,722,176

$ 3,972,432
5,112,070
631,749
–
9,716,251

$

550,000
3,322,683
237,656
501,907
4,612,246

$

550,180
3,308,511
240,142
499,350
4,598,183

mortgage-backed securities

10,111,278

9,987,820

22,868,658

22,252,360

$ 19,833,454

$ 19,704,071

$ 27,480,904

$ 26,850,543

There were no sales of securities available-for-sale or securities held-to-maturity during 2006 and 2005.

26

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

3. SECURITIES (concluded)

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2006 and 2005, aggregated by investment category

and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:

December 31, 2006

U.S. Government 
agencies and 
corporations
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage 

obligations

Mortgage-backed securities

LESS THAN 12 MONTHS

12 MONTHS OR GREATER

TOTAL

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

$

– $

– $

6,921,359 $

(52,750) $ 6,921,359 $

499,350

(2,557)

–

–

499,350

(52,750)
(2,557)

–
1,782,153

–
(12,136)

826,615
25,209,709

(27,308)
(753,355)

826,615
26,991,862

(27,308)
(765,491)

Total

$ 2,281,503 $

(14,693) $ 32,957,683 $

(833,413) $ 35,239,186 $

(848,106)

December 31, 2005

U.S. Government 
agencies and 
corporations
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage 

obligations

Mortgage-backed securities

LESS THAN 12 MONTHS

12 MONTHS OR GREATER

TOTAL

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

$ 14,360,464 $

729,928

(85,138) $
(9,763)

4,926,247
–

$

(65,902) $ 19,286,711 $

–

729,928

(151,040)
(9,763)

1,002,131
9,511,176

(28,616)
(208,789)

–
21,558,237

–
(809,048)

1,002,131
31,069,413

(28,616)
(1,017,837)

Total

$ 25,603,699 $

(332,306) $ 26,484,484

$

(874,950) $ 52,088,183 $ (1,207,256)

Management  evaluates  securities  for  other-than-temporary  impairment  at  least  on  a  quarterly  basis,  and  more  frequently  when 

economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the

fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of

the Bank to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

These unrealized losses related principally to current interest rates for similar types of securities. In analyzing an issuer’s financial

condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades

by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. As management has the ability

to hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future if classified as available-for-sale, no declines are deemed to be

other-than-temporary.

27

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

4. LOANS

The composition of net loans at December 31 is as follows:

Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential real estate
Consumer

Subtotal

Allowance for loan losses
Net deferred loan costs (fees)

Loans, net

2006

2005

$

60,389,111
68,908,833
81,451,996
9,238,971

$

51,823,665
70,568,854
67,352,177
6,683,906

219,988,911

196,428,602

(2,784,125)
60,995

(2,383,359)
(15,396)

$ 217,265,781

$

194,029,847

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, nonaccrual loans were $520,528 and $343,061, respectively. There were no loans 90 days past due

and still accruing interest at December 31, 2006 and 2005.

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses follows:

Years Ended December 31,

2006

2005

Balance at beginning of year
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously charged off

Balance at end of year

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:  

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

Total impaired loans

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans

$

$

2,383,359
525,000
(128,915)
4,681

2,391,187
780,000
(831,260)
43,432

$

2,784,125

$

2,383,359

2006

2005

$

$

$

520,528

520,528

130,132

$

$

$

343,061

343,061

171,530

Years Ended December 31,

2006

2005

Average investment in impaired loans

$

595,211

$

304,387

No interest income was recognized on impaired loans during 2006 and 2005. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in

connection with impaired loans. 

28

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

5. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of premises and equipment follows:

Land and improvements
Buildings and improvements
Equipment

Accumulated depreciation

2006

2005

$

$

1,922,993
7,223,330
3,695,403

12,841,726
(4,197,418)

1,922,993
7,224,431
4,578,202

13,725,626
(4,847,472)

$

8,644,308

$

8,878,154

Depreciation, included in occupancy and equipment expense, amounted to $627,729 and $656,469 for the years ended December
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Pursuant to the terms of noncancelable lease agreements in effect at December 31, 2006, pertaining to premises and equipment,
future minimum rent commitments under various operating leases are as follows:

2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

$

$

154,547
120,047
118,547
109,747
21,916

524,804

The leases contain options to extend for periods from three to ten years. The cost of such extensions is not included above. Total
rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 amounted to $160,654 and $155,741, respectively.

6. DEPOSITS

At December 31, 2006, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Thereafter

$

52,805,636
10,000,979
25,819
23,706
217,086
61,338

$

63,134,564

Deposit accounts with related parties were $4,981,000 and $4,866,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 

7. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE

Securities  sold  under  repurchase  agreements  mature  within  twelve  months  and  are  collateralized  by  securities  in  the  Bank’s 
investment portfolio.

The  maximum  amount  of  repurchase  agreements  outstanding  at  any  month-end  during  2006  and  2005  was  $25,951,442  and
$21,803,899, respectively. The average amount of repurchase agreements outstanding during 2006 and 2005 was $13,647,735 and
$8,130,256, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005
was 3.94% and 2.62%, respectively.  

All securities collateralizing the repurchase agreements are under the Bank’s control.

29

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

8. ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

The Bank’s fixed-rate advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of $3,214,085 at December 31, 2006 mature through

2013. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, interest rates of fixed-rate advances ranged from 2.90% to 4.33%.

Outstanding FHLB borrowings are secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral consisting primarily of loans with first mortgages

secured by one to four family properties, certain unencumbered investment securities, and other qualified assets.

The contractual maturities of advances are as follows:

2006
2007
2008
2009
2013

Total

2006

2005

$

$

–
1,000,000
500,000
1,349,393
364,692

5,000,000
1,000,000
500,000
1,947,592
409,487

$

3,214,085

$

8,857,079

9. INCOME TAXES

Allocation of federal and state income taxes between current and deferred portions is as follows:

Current tax expense

Federal
State

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

Federal
State

2006

2005

$

2,025,630
313,081
2,338,711

$

1,574,090
120,000
1,694,090

(123,200)
(40,000)
(163,200)

58,800
(4,900)
53,900

$

2,175,511

$

1,747,990

The income tax provision differs from the expense that would result from applying federal statutory rates to income before income

taxes, as follows:

Computed tax expense
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:

Tax exempt income
State taxes, net of federal benefit
(Income) expense from life insurance
Incentive stock options
Other

30

2006

2005

$

2,027,226

$

1,763,419

(41,143)
141,831
24,517
19,206
3,874

(40,177)
57,552
(36,690)
–
3,886

$

2,175,511

$

1,747,990

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

9. INCOME TAXES (concluded)

The components of the net deferred tax asset, included in other assets, are as follows:

Deferred tax assets

Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
Allowance for loan losses
Employee benefit plans
Other

Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation
Other

2006

2005

$

$

44,000
903,100
213,200
42,700

104,800
731,000
261,300
30,200

1,203,000

1,127,300

264,700
126,300

391,000

291,400
126,300

417,700

Net deferred tax asset

$

812,000

$

709,600

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for 2006 and 2005:

2006

2005

Net income, as reported

$

3,786,919

$

3,438,532

Weighted-average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive employee stock options
Effect of unvested stock grant

Adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversion

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

1,009,788
4,740
1,000

1,015,528

1,002,958
4,186
–

1,007,144

$
$

3.75
3.73

$
$

3.43
3.41

11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK 

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs
of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments
to extend credit, standby and commercial letters-of-credit, and interest rate caps and floors written on adjustable rate loans. Such
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance
sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of
financial instruments. 

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments
to extend credit and standby letters-of-credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses
the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. For interest
rate caps and floors written on adjustable rate loans, the contract or notional amounts do not represent exposure to credit losses.  

31

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK (concluded)

The Bank generally requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the following financial instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

Commitments to grant loans

Commercial and standby letters-of-credit

CONTRACT AMOUNT

2006

2005

$

$

53,149,638

11,551,895

$

$

41,462,409

11,165,024

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. 

The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not

necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank, is based on

management’s credit evaluation of the customer.  

Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily

represent  future  cash  requirements.  The  Bank  evaluates  each  customer’s  creditworthiness  on  a  case-by-case  basis.  The  amount  of 

collateral  obtained,  if  deemed  necessary  by  the  Bank  upon  extension  of  credit,  is  based  on  management’s  credit  evaluation  of  the 

counterparty.  Collateral  held  varies,  but  may  include  accounts  receivable,  inventory,  property,  plant  and  equipment,  and  income- 

producing commercial property.

Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

Those  guarantees  are  primarily  issued  to  support  private  borrowing  arrangements.  The  credit  risk  involved  in  issuing  letters-of- 

credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

At times, the Bank places interest rate caps and floors on loans written by the Bank to enable customers to transfer, modify, or reduce

their interest rate risk.

12. LEGAL CONTINGENCIES

Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business which, in the opinion of management, will have no

material effect on the Bank’s financial statements.  

13. MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

The Bank is restricted as to the amount of dividends which can be paid. Dividends declared by national banks that exceed the net

income (as defined) for the current year plus retained net income for the preceding two years must be approved by the Office of the

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Regardless of formal regulatory restrictions, the Bank may not pay dividends that would result

in its capital levels being reduced below the minimum requirements discussed below.

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum

capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken,

could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory frame-

work for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, 

liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and

classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

32

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

13. MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (concluded)

Quantitative  measures  established  by  regulation  to  ensure  capital  adequacy  require  the  Bank  to  maintain  minimum  amounts  and

ratios (set forth in the following table, dollars in thousands) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital

to average assets as these are defined in the regulations. Management believes, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, that the Bank met

all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2006, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory

framework  for  prompt  corrective  action.  To  be  categorized  as  well  capitalized,  an  institution  must  maintain  minimum  total  risk-

based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the 

notification  that  management  believes  have  changed  the  Bank’s  category.  The  Bank’s  actual  capital  amounts  and  ratios  as  of

December 31, 2006 and 2005 are also presented in the table. 

ACTUAL

MINIMUM
CAPITAL
REQUIREMENT

MINIMUM
TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTION PROVISIONS

AMOUNT

RATIO

AMOUNT >

RATIO >

AMOUNT >

RATIO >

(dollars in thousands)

30,140

13.3%

$ 18,149

8.0%

$ 22,687

10.0%

27,356

12.1%

$

9,075

4.0%

$ 13,612

6.0%

27,356

8.8%

$ 12,405

4.0%

$ 15,506

5.0%

26,976

13.0%

24,594

11.9%

24,594

8.8%

$

$

$

16,602

8.0%

8,301

4.0%

11,124

4.0%

$

$

$

20,752

10.0%

12,451

6.0%

13,905

5.0%

December 31, 2006
Total Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Average Assets

December 31, 2005
Total Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Average Assets

$

$

$

$

$

$

14. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Bank sponsors a 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers all employees who are at least 21 years of age and who have completed

one year of employment. Eligible employees contribute a percentage of their annual compensation to the 401(k) plan and the Bank

matches  a  certain  portion  of  employee  contributions.  In  addition,  the  Bank  may  make  discretionary  contributions  on  behalf  of

employees under the plan. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, expense attributable to the plan amounted to $501,738

and $427,284, respectively.

Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the balance sheets at December 31, 2006 and  2005 are liabilities established 

pursuant  to  deferred  compensation  agreements  with  certain  officers  of  the  Bank  of  $538,376  and  $659,738,  respectively.  An 

adjustment was made in 2006 to reflect a reduction of benefits to a former officer. Deferred compensation expense (benefit) related

to these plans amounted to $(121,362) and $95,593 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.  

33

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

15. WARRANTS

Warrants  to  purchase  shares  of  the  Bank’s  common  stock  at  various  exercise  prices  have  been  granted  to  certain  members  of  the

organizing group, key management, and employees of the Bank prior to April 2006. The warrants vest in three years and expire ten

years from the date the warrant was granted.

On  April  19,  2006,  the  shareholders  of  the  Bank  approved  the  2006  Stock  Option  and  Incentive  Plan  (the  “current  plan”).    The 

maximum number of shares of stock reserved and available for issuance under this Plan is 50,000 shares.  Awards may be granted in

the form of incentive stock options and restricted stock, or any combinations of the preceding, and the exercise price shall not be less

than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant.  No stock options are exercisable more than ten years after the date the stock

option is granted.

On  January  1,  2006,  the  Bank  adopted  the  provisions  of  SFAS  No.  123(R)  for  the  incentive  stock  option  grants  relating  to  the 

current plan and previous plans. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the Bank recorded approximately $56,000

of compensation expense during 2006. Total compensation expense related to nonvested awards not yet recognized at December 31,

2006 is $63,773 and these awards vest over the next 3 years.

Under the current plan, the Bank granted 1,000 shares of restricted stock in 2006 with a fair value of $42.00 at grant date. This grant

comprises the Bank’s nonvested stock awards at December 31, 2006.

The fair value of warrants granted during 2006 and 2005 was $6.75 and $6.56, respectively. The fair value of each warrant granted

is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 

Dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life
Expected volatility

2006

2.70%
4.64%
10 Years
9.75%

2005

2.30%
4.50%
10 Years
N/A

A summary of warrant activity as of December 31, 2006, and changes during the year then ended is presented below: 

Outstanding at beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2006

Exercisable at December 31, 2006

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL
LIFE

AGGREGATE
INTRINSIC
VALUE

35.98
40.00
17.85
35.25

36.51

36.42

$

$

$

12,575

547,102

455,382

5.0 years

5.2 years

SHARES

58,666
4,500
(500)
(5,000)

57,666

40,333

$

$

$

34

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

15. WARRANTS (concluded)

Information pertaining to warrants outstanding at December 31, 2006 is as follows:

WARRANTS OUTSTANDING

WARRANTS EXERCISABLE

RANGE OF
EXERCISE PRICES

NUMBER
OUTSTANDING

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL LIFE

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE

NUMBER
EXERCISABLE

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE

$15.95 - $17.85
$32.00 - $41.84
Outstanding at
end of year

2,916
54,750

0.4 years
5.3 years

57,666

5.0 years

$

$

17.85
37.51

36.51

2,916
38,917

41,833

$

$

17.85
36.41

35.11

The remaining number of warrants available to be granted was 44,500 and 699 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

16. OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES

The components of other noninterest income and expenses which are in excess of 1% of total revenues (total interest and

dividend income and noninterest income) and not shown separately in the statements of income are as follows for the years

ended December 31:

Income

Gain on sale of loans

Expenses

Credit card charges
Advertising

2006

2005

$

$

$

238,571

767,767
371,532

1,139,299

$

$

$

204,038

678,445
335,816

1,014,261

35

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Bank has had, and may be expected to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors,

principal officers, their immediate families and affiliated companies in which they are principal shareholders (commonly referred to

as related parties), all of which have been, in the opinion of management, on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral,

as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with others. Loans granted to related parties amounted to $1,715,808 and

$1,614,808 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced

liquidation.  Fair  value  is  best  determined  based  upon  quoted  market  prices.  However,  in  many  instances,  there  are  no  quoted 

market prices for the Bank’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based

on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used,

including  the  discount  rate  and  estimates  of  future  cash  flows.  Accordingly,  the  fair  value  estimates  may  not  be  realized  in  an 

immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which prescribes fair value

disclosures, excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the

aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Bank.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Bank in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.

Securities: Fair values for securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock, are based on quoted

market prices. The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock approximate fair value based on

the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank. 

Loans held for sale: Fair values of loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market prices.   

Loans receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based

on  carrying  values.  Fair  values  for  other  loans  are  estimated  using  discounted  cash  flow  analyses,  using  interest  rates 

currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for nonperforming loans are

estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.   

Deposit  liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and

certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their

carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate

their  fair  values  at  the  reporting  date.  Fair  values  for  fixed-rate  certificates  of  deposit  are  estimated  using  a  discounted cash  flow 

calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregate expected monthly maturities 

on time deposits. 

36

NOTES to FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2006 and 2005

18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (concluded)

Securities  sold  under  agreements  to  repurchase: The  carrying  amounts  of  borrowings  under  repurchase  agreements  maturing

within ninety days approximate their fair values.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair values of these borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses

based on the Bank’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued interest: The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-balance-sheet  instruments: The  Bank’s  off-balance-sheet  instruments  consist  of  loan  commitments.  Fair  values  for  loan 

commitments have not been presented as the future revenue derived from such financial instruments is not significant.

The estimated fair values, and related carrying or notional amounts, of the Bank’s financial instruments are as follows:

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Securities available-for-sale
Securities held-to-maturity
Federal Home Loan Bank and
Federal Reserve Bank stock
Loans and loans held for sale, net
Accrued interest receivable

Financial liabilities
Deposits
Repurchase agreements
Advances from Federal Home

Loan Bank

Accrued interest payable

2006

2005

CARRYING
AMOUNT

FAIR
VALUE

CARRYING
AMOUNT

FAIR
VALUE

$ 41,645,016
19,704,071
27,480,904

$ 41,645,016
19,704,071
26,850,543

$ 18,240,101
12,997,261
45,886,014

$ 18,240,101
12,997,261
45,021,933

1,092,650
218,868,531
1,081,957

1,092,650
219,551,650
1,081,957

1,717,850
194,892,597
1,099,791

1,717,850
195,709,366
1,099,791

271,142,194
17,389,539

272,900,503
17,389,539

240,827,605
10,259,834

241,301,815
10,259,834

3,214,085
209,221

3,373,807
209,221

8,857,079
120,019

8,817,962
120,019

37

BOARD of DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT and OFFICERS

Ledyard National Bank

BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

Douglas G. Britton
President, Britton Lumber Co., Inc.

Cary P. Clark
Retired General Counsel,
Dartmouth College

Cotton M. Cleveland
President, Mather Associates

Richard W. Couch, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Hypertherm, Inc.

William B. Hamilton, Jr.
President, Investment & Trust Services Division,
Ledyard National Bank 

SENIOR MANAGEMENT 

Kathryn G. Underwood
President and Chief Executive Officer 

William B. Hamilton, Jr.
President, Investment & Trust Services Division 

Gregory D. Steverson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

OFFICERS 

Constance B. Aldrich                        
Assistant Trust Officer
and Investment Support Manager

Margie L. Arbuckle-Morrill
Vice President and Trust Officer

Donna L. Batchelder
Trust Operations Officer

Betty J. Benson
Assistant Vice President
and Central Operations Officer

Gail M. Broughton
Assistant Vice President  
and Regional Office Manager, Lyme & Norwich

Alison A. Bruce
Compliance Administration Officer

Terri L. Crate
Assistant Vice President
and Loan Administration Officer 

Debra J. Curtis
Personal Banking Officer
and Office Manager, West Lebanon 

Judith B. Dionne
Vice President and Trust Operations Officer

Claudette M. Duhamel
Assistant Vice President
and Office Manager, New London

L. Joyce Hampers
Attorney, Former U.S. Assistant Secretary
of Commerce and President, Joymark, Inc.                   

Adam M. Keller
Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration, Dartmouth College

Dennis E. Logue
Steven Roth Professor of Management Emeritus, 
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College 
and Chair, Ledyard National Bank

Frederick A. Roesch
Retired, Senior Vice President, Citigroup/Citibank
and Co-Vice Chair, Ledyard National Bank

Andrew A. Samwick
Professor of Economics and Director, 
Nelson A. Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College       

Deirdre Sheerr-Gross, AIA
Principal, Sheerr and White, 
Residential Architecture

Bayne Stevenson
President, Bayson Company

Kathryn G. Underwood
President and Chief Executive Officer, 
Ledyard National Bank

James W. Varnum
Retired President, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Alliance 
and Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital and
Co-Vice Chair, Ledyard National Bank

Martha P. Candon
Senior Vice President
and Senior Retail Banking Officer

Mark S. Clough
Senior Vice President and Senior Loan Officer 

Darcy D. Rogers
Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer

Grady L. M. George
Trust Officer

Jennifer J. Goin
Trust Officer

William R. Hatch
Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer

Michelle M. LeClair
Commercial Loan Officer

Katherine J. Lucier
Assistant Vice President and Regional Office Manager,
Lebanon & West Lebanon

Robin A. Mazejka
Regional Office Manager, Hanover Main Street
and Lebanon Street Offices

Jon E. Molesworth
Vice President and Trust Investment Officer

Catherine E. Murray
Vice President and Mortgage Loan Officer

Valerie J. Nevel
Vice President and Trust Officer

Christopher C. Ng
Vice President and Trust Investment Officer

D. Rodman Thomas
Senior Vice President and Senior Trust Officer

Darlene E. Romano
Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Finance 

Victoria L. Peiffer
Trust Administrative Officer

Kevin J. Raleigh
Senior Vice President and Senior Commercial 
Loan Officer

Michael K. Sandoe
Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer

Debra W. Sias
Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer

David C. Skewes
Mortgage Loan Officer

Donna J. St. Peter
Personal Banking Officer

Edmund R. Taylor
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

Gail E. Trottier
Assistant Vice President and Personal Banking Officer

Joel T. Underwood
Senior Vice President and Trust Investment Officer 

As of February 9, 2007

38

STAFF

Ledyard National Bank

FULL-TIME STAFF

Stacey A. Alexander
Teller, Customer Service Representative

Karrie L. Longley
Head Teller

Arleen A. Berry
Customer Service Representative

Vicky C. Lorden
Customer Service Representative

Thomas M. Berry
Data Processing and Information Systems Manager

Amy L. Martin
Customer Service Representative

Robin M. Cantlin
Commercial Loan Processor

Stephanie J. Chase
Office Supervisor

Deborah J. McDanolds
Customer Service Representative

Cynthia L. McSpadden
Head Teller

Julie A. Courtemanche
Trust Investment Support Specialist

Gregory J. Monmaney
Customer Service Representative

Cara J. Dyke
Office Supervisor                

Lisa Kathleen Murch
Mortgage Loan Processor

Deborah J. Farnsworth
Finance Specialist and Training Coordinator 

Patricia M. Neily
Head Teller        

Michelle J. Fellows
Commercial Loan Processor 

Anna M. Gayhart
Teller, Customer Service Representative

Danielle L. Gohlke
Customer Service Representative

Stephanie Gordon
Customer Service Representative 

Carrie Anne Hamel
Customer Service Receptionist

Doreen J. Holmes
Head Teller 

Rebecca L. Newhall
Customer Service Representative

Cortney Ann Nichols
Central Operations Assistant

Tammy L. Norway
Trust Operations Assistant 

Lillian R. Olsen
Customer Service Representative

Robin L. Olsen
Customer Service Representative

Erica C. Paronto
Proof Operations Assistant

Zvonko Ilic                             
Assistant Branch Manager

Sandra Jean Pike
Customer Service Representative

Jeanine M. Leathe
Administrative Assistant, Investment & Trust 
Services Divisiion

Tracy W. Lombardi
Community Relations and Assistant 
Marketing Coordinator 

Betty J. Renault
Wire Transfer and Operations Assistant

Roxanne M. Russell
Trust Operations Assistant 

39

Sarah S. Salo
Administrative Assistant, Sales and Marketing
Coordinator and Office Manager

Staci R. Sargent
Customer Service Representative

Victoria L. Schettino
Deposit Operations Assistant

Brett A. Smith
Finance Manager

Michelle R. Stewart
Technical Support Manager

Alexis L. Swain
Loan Operations Assistant

Jessica L. Taylor
Customer Service Representative                       

Monica M. Tuckerman
Operations and Administrative Assistant

Michelle L. Whitcomb
Office Supervisor

Loretta V. Zuger                                   
Trust Administrative Assistant 

PART-TIME STAFF

Linda P. Bedford
Commercial Loan Credit Administrator

Kathryn S. Walker
Trust Administrative Assistant 

As of February 9, 2007

ADVISORY BOARDS

Ledyard National Bank

FOUNDING ADVISORS

Richard W. Birnie, Ph.D.
Professor of Earth Sciences,
Dartmouth College

Douglas G. Britton
President, Britton Lumber Co., Inc.

Dorothy M. Byrne
President, The Byrne Foundation

Robert L. Callender
Private Investor

Fred P. Carleton
Real Estate Management

Brian H. Cole
Owner/President, Cole Electric, Inc.
and Owner, Vermont Alpaca Company

Paul Danos
Dean, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth
and Laurence F. Whittemore Professor
of Business Administration

Joseph F. Daschbach, Esq.
Daschbach, Csatari & Young, PLLC

Bradley Dewey, Jr.
Retired

INVESTMENT
ADVISORY BOARD

Robert Z. Aliber, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Business,
University of Chicago

William B. Hamilton, Jr., J.D.
President, Investment & Trust Services Division,
Ledyard National Bank

L. Joyce Hampers, J.D., L.L.M.
Attorney, Former U.S. Assistant Secretary
of Commerce and President, Joymark, Inc.

S. Whitney Dickey
Retired Banker

Donald Carpenter Goss
Retired Advertising Agency Partner

Charles M. Hebble, Jr.
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Creonics, Inc.

Dennis E. Logue, M.B.A., Ph.D.
Steven Roth Professor of Management, Emeritus, 
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College 
and Chair, Ledyard National Bank

Mado R. Macdonald                        
Executive Officer, Emerita,
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College

J. Jeffrey Maloney, CLU, ChFC
Abacus Consulting, LLC

Ann D. McLaughry
Vice President, McLaughry Associates, Inc.
and President, Upper Valley Real Estate Services

Robert D. McLaughry
Chairman, McLaughry Associates, Inc.

Nancy Hayward Mitchell
Retired Chairman, Dartmouth Travel

John S. North
Retired Chief Operating Officer,
New England Telephone

James E. Porath, C.P.A.
Partner, Tonneson and Co.

Alfred T. Quirk
Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid, 
Emeritus, Dartmouth College

Frank E. Sands II
Chairman, King Arthur Flour Co., Inc.

Edward M. Scheu, Jr.
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Luminescent Systems, Inc.

Geraldine Searles
President, Ruggles Mine, Inc.

Richard H. Showalter, Jr., C.P.A.
Chief Financial Officer, Dartmouth-Hitchcock

Richard S. Shreve, M.B.A.
Adjunct Professor of Business Ethics,
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College

Joseph C. Stevens, M.D.

Dennis E. Logue, M.B.A., Ph.D.
Steven Roth Professor of Management, Emeritus, 
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College and 
Chair, Ledyard National Bank

Andrew A. Samwick
Professor of Economics and Director, 
Nelson A. Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College

Deirdre Sheerr-Gross, AIA
Principal, Sheerr and White, 
Residential Architecture

Richard S. Shreve, M.B.A.
Adjunct Professor of Business Ethics,
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College

Edmund R. Taylor, C.F.A.
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer,
Ledyard National Bank

D. Rodman Thomas, J.D.
Senior Vice President and Senior Trust Officer,
Ledyard National Bank

Kent Womack, M.B.A., Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Finance, Tuck School 
of Business, Dartmouth College

As of February 9, 2007

40

NORWICH 
COMMUNITY BOARD

Terry P. Appleby
General Manager,
Hanover Cooperative Society, Inc.

Perrine McConnel
Co-owner, Norwich Bookstore, Inc.

Bruce “Buff” McLaughry
President, McLaughry Associates, Inc.

Steve Richardson
President, Chief Tormentor,
Stave Puzzles, Inc.

Sally J. Wilson
Retired

COMMUNITY BOARDS

Ledyard National Bank

HANOVER
COMMUNITY BOARD

LYME 
COMMUNITY BOARD

Julia N. Griffin
Town Manager, Town of Hanover

Martha E. Diebold
Martha E. Diebold Real Estate

David Laurin
Managing Partner, Banwell Architects

Nancy S. Dwight
Chairman, Dwight Partners, Inc.

Bruce Pacht
Executive Director, Twin Pines Housing Trust

Lloyd G. Nichols
Tarm USA, Inc.

Barry C. Schuster, Esq.
Schuster, Buttrey & Wing, P.A.

LEBANON
COMMUNITY BOARD

William Babineau
Managing Member,
Vermont Mailing Systems, LLC

Terri Dudley
Talk Show Host and Former Mayor 

Patrick E. Flanagan
Patrick E. Flanagan Real Estate Broker

Barry C. Schuster, Esq.
Schuster, Buttrey & Wing, P.A.

Bruce M. Waters, CCIM
McLaughry Commercial Associates, Inc.

John S. North
Retired Chief Operations Officer,
New England Telephone

Norman C. Wakely
Co-Director, Grant Brook
Educational Services

NEW LONDON
COMMUNITY BOARD

Thomas J. Brennan
Superintendent,
Kearsarge Regional School District

Laurie T. DiClerico

Diana Doheny
Realtor, Gale & Associates

Lawrence Dufault, Esq.                            
Dufault & Dufault

Bruce P. King
Chief Executive Officer, New London Hospital 

Gail Matthews

Jeff Milne
Principal, Milne/Currier Associates

Andrea F. Steel
President and CEO,
Lake Sunapee Region Visiting Nurse Association

Ellen D. Winkler
Principal Designer, Chief Executive Officer, 
Ellen’s Interiors                                                      

As of February 9, 2007

LLedyard National Bank Offices:

HANOVER
38 Main Street | 603-643-2244
Lobby, Walk-Up and ATM

Investment & Trust Services | 603-643-0044 

Lebanon Street at Park Street | 603-643-7457
Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

Dartmouth College | Collis Center ATM

LEBANON

Route 120 at Old Etna Road | 603-448-2220

Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

Centerra Park/River Valley Club ATM

LYME

On The Green | 603-795-2288

Lobby and ATM

NEW LONDON

178 County Road | 603-526-7725

Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

Investment & Trust Services | 603-526-9251

NORWICH, VERMONT

320 Main Street | 802-649-2050

Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

WEST LEBANON

67 Main Street | 603-298-9444

Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

Powerhouse Mall ATM

WHITE RIVER JUNCTION, VERMONT

Gateway Motors | Sykes Avenue ATM 

KWIKNET INTERNET BANKING

www.ledyardbank.com

KWIKTEL TELEPHONE BANKING

1 - 8 8 8 - KW I K T E L

1 - 8 8 8 - 5 9 4 - 5 8 3 5

M E M B E R   F D I C