Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / Ledyard Financial Group, Inc.

Ledyard Financial Group, Inc.

lfgp · OTC Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker lfgp
Exchange OTC
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2008 Annual Report · Ledyard Financial Group, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
a n n u a l   r e p o r t

20
08

strong relationships, personal service and a commitment to community.

Table of Contents

Letter from the CEO & Board Chair. . . . .page 2

Ledyard Financial Group. . . . .page 5

Ledyard National Bank. . . . .page 8

Ledyard Financial Advisors. . . . .page 10

Community Support......page 12

Management’s Financial Discussion. . . . .page 14

Independent Auditor’s Report. . . . .page 17

Balance Sheets. . . . .page 18

Statement of Condition. . . . .page 19

Notes to Financial Statements. . . . .page 20

Directors  & Senior Management . . . . .page 40

(cid:2)

ON THE COVER:

Photograph of the Ledyard Bridge
by John Douglas, Flying Squirrel and
the Hanover Area Chamber of Commerce.

All other photos by Jon Gilbert Fox,
with the exception of the courtesy photos 
on page 13.

Financial Highlights

Years-ended December 31, 

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Financial Condition Data

Assets

Investments

$ 363,345

$ 325,803

$ 320,230

$285,495

$ 268,869

94,014

53,706

Net Loans, including loans held for sale

226,405

228,879

Deposits

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Shareholders’ Equity

295,586

276,933

21,868

31,283

1,551

30,517

48,278

218,869

271,142

3,214

27,271

60,601

194,893

240,828

8,857

24,391

65,467

175,189

227,614

11,981

21,849

Operating Data

Net Interest Income

Provision for Loan Loss

Non-interest Income

Non-interest Expense

Income Taxes

Net Income

Other Data

Earnings per Share, basic

Dividends per Share

Dividend Payout Ratio

Book Value per Share

Shares Outstanding

Return on Average Assets

Return on Average Equity

Equity to Asset Ratio

Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Loans

$

12,892

$ 12,480

$ 12,099

$ 11,486

$ 10,053

3,123

6,449

705

6,754

525

6,282

780

5,834

325

5,330

13,150

12,306

11,894

11,354

10,452

1,040

2,028

2,361

3,862

2,176

3,787

1,748

3,439

1,593

3,013

$

$

$

$

$

1.99

1.24

62%

3.80

1.16

31%

30.61

$

29.95

$

$

$

3.75

1.08

29%

$

$

3.43

0.98

29%

26.99

$ 24.16

$

$

$

3.03

0.91

30%

21.96

1,021,510

1,018,996

1,010,246

1,009,746

994,895

0.62%

6.68%

8.61%

2.13%

1.20%

1.31%

1.25%

1.20%

13.37%

14.66%

14.85%

14.56%

9.37%

1.45%

8.52%

1.27%

8.54%

1.21%

8.13%

1.35%

1

Letter from the Ceo and Board Chair

TO OUR FELLOW OWNERS, OUR LOYAL CUSTOMERS

AND MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY: 

A

gainst the challenging backdrop of 2008’s economic troubles, we’re pleased to report that Ledyard

Financial Group performed well. Ledyard’s total revenue was at an all-time high and we paid a

record dividend to our shareholders. Additionally, Ledyard Financial Advisors’ investment results 

outperformed all relative national equity indexes for the year – one reason why we added new

accounts with an aggregate market value of nearly $80 million.  

We demonstrated strength and resilience as the year progressed and economic conditions 

worsened. Our regulatory capital ratios remained well in excess of the amount needed to be 

considered well-capitalized, the highest designation possible. Ledyard proactively took steps to 

mitigate the effects of rising delinquencies and foreclosures on borrowers and others. Additionally,

we took part in new FDIC programs that were designed to promote liquidity and contain other

forms of turmoil that threatened all aspects of our economy. One such program was the Transaction

Account Guarantee Program that federally secured certain types of accounts for their entire amount.

Other important aspects of our work are shared in the following pages of this annual report.  

Ledyard’s true distinction continues to be its position in the community, which ultimately defines

its place in the banking landscape. Ledyard truly incorporates its employees into the community.  

It encourages all employees to play an active role in developing and guiding the bank’s future.  

The niche we occupy is even more visible in today’s economic environment. As larger banks

continue to merge and turn themselves into financial conglomerates, members of our communities

perceive us still as a personal, neighborhood organization. We are small enough to hear all of our

customers’ needs and expectations, practically in real-time – and we are strong enough to respond

to those needs with appropriate solutions. Our culture may best be defined by the notion of 

“leadership every day.” It influences our training, job development and hiring practices.  

In all of these activities, and many others that we do not have the space to mention, we

worked towards our vision of being the financial services institution of choice in each community 

we serve. In our daily work, we are focused more than ever on making a difference in the lives 

of our customers, shareholders, employees and neighbors.  

2

Letter from the Ceo and Board Chair (concluded)

We also welcomed our new Senior Vice President and Senior Loan Officer, Dan Stannard. In this

position, Dan is responsible for managing the bank’s lending efforts, including commercial, residen-

tial mortgage and consumer lending. The importance of a strong Commercial Banking Team and

loan department has never been more important and we’re confident that Dan will achieve much

success in his new role.  

On a final note pertaining to 2008, it comes as no surprise that it was a challenging year – for

the US and global economy, the financial sector, and for banks, in particular. As we reflect on the

developments of the last 12 months and on our successes, we recognize the importance of striking 

the right balance between solving immediate challenges and looking to the future for long term

opportunities. We have truly created that balance and believe that we will emerge from these diffi-

cult times stronger than ever.

Going forward, Ledyard has a clear and focused strategy. Strict management of capital, costs

and risks will continue to be a top priority. We will continue to enhance our banking businesses 

and build upon our competitive advantage in Investment, Tax & Wealth Management.

We thank you for your support and look forward to strengthening the partnerships we’ve built

with you, our shareholders and customers, in 2009. (cid:2)

Kathryn Underwood
President & CEO, 

Ledyard Financial Group/

Ledyard National Bank

Dennis E. Logue
Chair, Ledyard Financial Group/

Ledyard National Bank

Kathryn G. Underwood
President and Chief Executive
Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

Dennis E. Logue
Chair,
Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

3

Board of Directors

FRONT ROW, SEATED LEFT TO RIGHT:

BACK ROW, LEFT TO RIGHT:

Frederick A. Roesch
Retired, Senior Vice President, 
Citigroup/Citibank and Co-Vice Chair,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

James W. Varnum
Retired President, Dartmouth-Hitchcock 
Alliance & Mary Hitchcock Memorial 
Hospital and Co-Vice Chair, 
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

L. Joyce Hampers
Attorney, Former U.S. Assistant Secretary
of Commerce and President, Joymark, Inc.

Dennis E. Logue
Steven Roth Professor of Management 
Emeritus, Tuck School of Business, 
Dartmouth College and Chair, 
Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

Andrew A. Samwick
Professor of Economics and Director, 
Nelson A. Rockefeller Center 
at Dartmouth College

Douglas G. Britton
President, Britton Lumber Co. Inc.,
and Secretary, Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

Adam M. Keller
Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration, Dartmouth College

Cotton M. Cleveland
President, Mather Associates

Kathryn G. Underwood
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

Richard W. Couch, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive 
Officer, Hypertherm, Inc.

NOT PICTURED:

Bayne Stevenson
President, Bayson Company

Deirdre Sheerr-Gross
Principal, Sheerr and White
Residential Architecture

4

ledyard financial group

Strong relationships, personal service and commitment to community.

L

edyard Financial Group, the holding company for Ledyard National Bank, remains true

to the bank’s founding principles established in 1991. Those principles include delivering

unparalleled personal service on every level, developing and maintaining strong relationships

with customers and shareholders, as well as empowering employees to fulfill their potential.

In essence, we strive to exceed our commitment to the communities we serve.

In the years since our founding, Ledyard has evolved from a small local bank to become 

a more sophisticated community-based financial organization that offers a relationship based

experience to individuals and businesses. We achieve superior results by coordinating all

aspects of our clients’ finances and providing comprehensive financial advice. Our updated

structure and focus puts Ledyard in the best possible position to deliver satisfying returns

to our shareholders.

Over the years, we have nurtured our commitment to community, expanding our

presence and involvement within the region so that our future has become mutually

entwined with that of the broader community. We have a vested interest in contributing to

the economic wellness and vibrancy of our communities, so we have consistently worked

hard to strengthen that bond. In truth, Ledyard employees see themselves as far more than

just “bank employees” performing a job. We truly strive to become life-long financial

partners with our customers and provide the expertise that will positively impact them and

our communities.  

“Our key business imperative is simple:

If we make our clients happy, 

shareholder expectations 

and rewards will follow.”

5

ledyard financial group (concluded)

We believe deeply in our mission statement and refer to it often in our decision-making

processes. At Ledyard, we experience much satisfaction from the knowledge that our work

impacts so many different constituents. For example, 

■ As a community bank for personal banking customers, we have long committed to 

helping people make the most important purchase of their lives  – their homes – in 

ways that are in their best interest.

■ As a resource for local small businesses – the lifeblood of our New Hampshire economy –            

we partner with each one to deliver customized solutions. We believe in sharing the ups and 

downs that are inherent in running these types of ventures. 

■ As wealth managers and advisors, we collaborate with our clients to create financial strategies 

that best suit their needs and aspirations. 

■ As an employer, we provide employees a work environment that is challenging, nurturing, 

educational and rewarding.  

■ As an investment for our shareholders, we deliver consistent and superior returns 

even in difficult economic times.  

Ledyard is financially sound and remains a strong, stable and loyal financial partner to

our colleagues, friends and neighbors. Using local deposits, we continue to invest in our

clients’ futures by helping them with milestones such as buying a new home or funding an

area business.  Further, our active involvement in community service is an integral part of our

investment strategy and helps to make the Upper Valley/Lake Sunapee region a better place

to live. Ledyard exemplifies true community based banking. We believe that by helping our
customers plan well, they’ll live well, too. (cid:2)

6

senior management team

SEATED LEFT TO RIGHT:

STANDING LEFT TO RIGHT: 

Gregory D. Steverson
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

Daniel X. Stannard, Jr.
Senior Vice President & Senior Loan Officer,
Ledyard National Bank

Jeffrey H. Marks 
Senior Vice President,                                    
Marketing & Client Experience,
Ledyard National Bank

Martha P. Candon
Senior Vice President & Senior Retail Banking Officer,
Ledyard National Bank

D. Rodman Thomas 
Senior Vice President & Chief Compliance Officer, 
Ledyard Financial Advisors, Ledyard National Bank

Darlene E. Romano 
Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Finance, 
Ledyard National Bank

Kathryn G. Underwood 
President & Chief Executive Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

Robert T. Boon
Executive Vice President & Managing Director, 
Ledyard Financial Advisors, Ledyard National Bank

Darcy D. Rogers
Senior Vice President & Chief Operations Officer,
Ledyard National Bank 

“We strive to establish ourselves as 

key financial partners

in the growth of our communities.”

7

ledyard national bank

Strength, stability, community-focused banking.

B

uilding relationships. Investing in local families and businesses. Making a difference in the

communities where we live and work. That’s what Ledyard National Bank is all about.

Individuals and families alike have come to rely on us to provide the most relevant financial

advice, or even to coordinate the overall management of their finances. This is particularly 

important in tough economic times. Others rely on us for their mortgages, home equity loans,

checking and savings accounts, investments and other banking solutions. Local businesses look to

us for the loans and financial  services they need to thrive and create jobs. We offer the latest in

banking technology for greater convenience. And we continually improve upon these offerings to

maximize the client experience. 

Ledyard’s key business philosophy is to develop meaningful client relationships that grow

through the years. This has provided us with the financial strength to maintain our momentum and

adjust our priorities to match the ever-changing economic landscape. In the last year Ledyard, once

again, partnered with Toby and Patty Fried, owner’s of Lou’s Restaurant in downtown Hanover to

help them realize a long-standing vision – to own, in addition to the restaurant, the property upon

which it was built. Lou’s Restaurant, an institution on Main Street since the 1950’s, has been a

Ledyard Bank customer since we opened our doors nearly 20 years ago. Our strong relationship

with the Fried’s as well as our understanding of the dynamics in our community, made us well 

suited to finance the purchase of the condominium unit occupied by Lou’s Restaurant and help 

grow their business. This transaction, defined by our focus on relationships and results, enabled 

the Frieds to reduce, as well as better control, their expenses simply by taking ownership of the 

PICTURED AT RIGHT:
Daniel Emanuele,
Vice President & Commercial Banker, 
and Alison Pearsons, 
Loan Credit Administration Officer,
sharing commercial loan terms 
with a business banking client.

PICTURED AT LEFT:
Gail Trottier,
Assistant Vice President 
& Personal Banking Officer, 
reviewing investment options 
with a bank client.

strong       

relationships

8

ledyard national bank (concluded)

property. We viewed the purchase as a logical next step for Lou’s ownership after their 2001 

renovation of the restaurant, for which we provided the line of credit and acted as consultative

partners as the work progressed. And because the restaurant also keeps its deposit account with

Ledyard, we are best positioned to reference a more holistic picture of Lou’s and offer our services

based on that information.

Today’s environment calls for providing our customers with a safe haven for their money

through a range of federally insured accounts. It also requires adhering to our longstanding 

lending practices and putting money back to work in our communities. Regardless of the

challenges before us, we are flexible enough to make critical and timely adjustments that 

ensure our clients’ best interests. 

Ledyard’s experienced Commercial Banking Team is expert at guiding its clients through

financial booms as well as through struggling economies. Because we work and reside in the

same community as our customers, we share and understand their needs. This type of background

knowledge is a valuable ingredient in providing solutions that work best for both parties. It helps

us assess the challenges and opportunities that the partnership will bring and strategize ways to

achieve success. One such example is Ledyard’s collaboration with North Branch Construction, a

local, well-known general contractor and construction management company that was founded in

1958. Looking to move from one facility to another and, in the process, expand their physical

footprint, North Branch Construction chose Ledyard to finance the venture. With our financial

support and guidance, they purchased and renovated an existing building, making it more energy

efficient as well as LEED certified. Once the move was complete Ledyard, together with North

Branch, reviewed their business processes to improve efficiencies. Our first recommendation, based

on their location, was the implementation of our Remote Deposit Capture product. It allowed

them to deposit checks at Ledyard without ever leaving their new facility. In essence, we helped

them save the time previously needed to physically take the checks to the branch for deposit.

As 2008 progressed, we offered a variety of relevant financial products and now look forward to

serving North Branch Construction’s needs for years to come.

We also realize that sometimes the greatest value we deliver to our clients is often not by 

providing a loan, but by being a non-credit resource. We act, in effect, as a sounding board and

we’re honored that so many clients depend upon us for practical advice and counsel. 

We work diligently to expand our financial knowledge base so that we may be an even

stronger resource for our business clients. Addressing issues such as business succession planning

or advising business owners on their other financial needs is all in a days work. 

We also believe in constantly expanding our network of business owners and professional

contacts. Often times, simply making a client aware of a new resource or making an introduction

to someone with a particular area of expertise can make a real difference.

We are more than simply a team of commercial bankers. We are a true partner in growth. (cid:2)

9

ledyard financial advisors 

Global experience, expert advice and local service.

L

edyard Financial Advisors has evolved into a premier wealth management firm providing integrated

investment, tax and wealth management services to affluent individuals and families throughout

the Dartmouth-Lake Sunapee Region. These services are provided by the area’s largest and

most experienced staff of advisors, accountants and portfolio managers utilizing a framework

of potential wealth management issues.

At Ledyard Financial Advisors our sole mission is that of preserving and enhancing our

client’s wealth.

PICTURED AT LEFT:
Dennis Mitchell, CFP®
discussing comprehensive 
financial planning with a
prospective client.

PICTURED AT RIGHT:
Valerie J. Nevel,
Vice President & Financial Advisor, 
working closely with a client.

personal

service

10

ledyard financial advisors (concluded)

Our approach to providing investment, tax, and wealth management services is driven by

the needs of our clients and their families. It is our only focus, and we dedicate the time

necessary to evaluate each clients’ current situation and family dynamics. Only then do we develop

a comprehensive program to meet their needs appropriately. 

As fiduciaries we are required to give primacy to clients’ interests and adhere to standards

of loyalty and prudence in administering their affairs. In other words, we are duty bound to

consider our clients’ interests before our own and this, combined with regular internal and external

examinations, ensures the highest levels of accountability and trust.  

We experienced many extraordinary events in 2008. Navigating through one of the most

difficult market and economic periods in modern times presented our investment strategy team

and portfolio managers with unprecedented challenges. Their experience, research and focus

enabled us to deliver results well above market indexes. Some of the team’s strategic decisions

contributing to this outcome were as follows:

■ Underweighted the financial sector for over a year with levels of only 3-10% versus S&P at 16% or higher

■ Lowered allocations to Europe and emerging markets to less then 8% during the year

■ Increased cash allocation to 15-20%, or twice normal levels

Additionally, Ledyard Financial Advisors completed its first year at our new office building on

Maple Street in Hanover and achieved the following milestones during 2008:

■ Opened 107 new accounts with $79 million in assets 

■ Welcomed 7 new associates that increased staffing to 26 advisors, planners, analysts, 

portfolio managers, lawyers, accountants and technical support 

■ Prepared personal income tax returns for over 20% of our clients

■ Introduced Financial Planning and Insurance Reviews as new services

■ Initiated weekly Market Update and monthly Stock Talk newsletters

We are confident in our 2009 investment strategies and will continue to maintain higher than

normal “cash” levels until other clear opportunities emerge. We are equally confident in our focus

on planning, advice and personal conversations as factors that clearly contribute to client success

and satisfaction. Simply put, no other investment firm matches our array of wealth management
services, depth of experience and local presence. (cid:2)

11

community support
Now, more than ever, our commitment remains strong.

T

hrough ongoing, prioritized reinvestment and active participation, Ledyard supports community

organizations throughout the Upper Valley/Lake Sunapee region that make a difference in a wide

spectrum of people’s lives. We understand that our work in this area reflects the values that our

bank was built upon and that we perpetuate to this day.

We are proud to help organizations that support the causes of education, contribute to

improving human services such as the health and well-being of children and adults, provide

community development resources, or advance the arts and humanities.

But our support is not only monetary. As a community bank, we have first hand knowledge

of the difficulties and challenges facing individuals, businesses and, non-profit organizations.

Specific to non-profits, the monetary donations that sustained them in years past have, in large

part, disappeared. Now, more than ever, these local groups need our support. To this end, many

Ledyard employees and board members serve on community boards or donate their time to a

wide variety of area organizations. In 2008, these efforts amounted to over 3,000 volunteer 

hours. To further advance these efforts we participated in last year’s Make a Difference Day, 

an all-encompassing annual event and national day of helping others. After rigorous research,

we chose seven projects, and more than fifty Ledyard employees and their families participated.

Projects included painting, cleaning, cooking meals for the sick, trail-cutting, community outreach

and preservation of an historic site.

Such community involvement is an integral part of Ledyard’s success. We are proud to give

back to those we serve. (cid:2)

12

community support (concluded)

PICTURED AT RIGHT:
Ledyard Senior Vice President of
Marketing, Jeff Marks, right, and
Dartmouth College Executive
Associate AD for Varsity Sports,
Brian Austin, left, present 
tournament championship trophy
to Dartmouth hockey team
captain, Rob Pritchard.
(Photo courtesy of Mark Washburn.)

PICTURED AT RIGHT:
Ledyard employees 
and their family members 
volunteer to paint
at Hannah House,
a local non-profit organization, 
on Make a Difference Day.
(Photo courtesy of Jennifer Engle.)

PICTURED AT LEFT:
Ledyard Senior Vice President of
Retail Banking, Marty Candon,
right, presents the Innovator of
the Year Award to Marc and Patty
Milowsky, founders of Blue Sky
Restaurant Group at the Hanover
Area Chamber of Commerce
Leadership Awards ceremony.
(Photo courtesy of Kawakahi Amina.)

PICTURED AT LEFT:
At David’s House,
a local non-profit 
organization, Ledyard
employees volunteer 
to cook for guests on 
Make a Difference Day.
(Photo courtesy of Bob Murch.)

a commitment

to community

13

management’s financial discussion

R

eview of Financial Statements

The discussion and analysis which follows focuses on the factors affecting the Company’s financial

condition at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and its results of operations for the years ended December 31,

2008 and 2007. The Financial Statements and Notes to the Financial Statements should be read in

conjunction with this review.

Statement of Income 

Our results for the year reflect the strength in our two basic businesses, community banking and

wealth advisory services. We continued to invest in both during 2008 in terms of people, facilities and

systems. Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 was a record high of $19,340,889,

compared to $19,234,820 for the same period in 2007. Net interest income for the year ended December

31, 2008 was at an all-time high of $12,891,820, compared to $12,479,924 for the same period in 2007.

Net income was $2,027,744, or $1.99 per share for the twelve months ended 2008 as compared to

$3,861,653, or $3.80 per share for 2007, a decrease of $1,833,909, or 47.49%. The increase in our

allowance for loan losses combined with the increased costs associated with the new headquarters for

Ledyard Financial Advisors were the primary contributors to our income being down for the year. 

Interest and fees on loans totaled $14,818,873 for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared

to $16,079,947 for 2007. This decrease of $1,261,074, or 7.84%, was due to a decrease in interest rates

that occurred during 2008. Investment income for the year ended December 31, 2008, totaled

$3,688,423 as compared to $3,870,930 for 2007, a decrease of $182,507, or 4.72%. 

The Company’s interest expense on deposits was $4,868,601 for the year ended December 31, 2008,

as compared to $6,782,369 for the year ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of $1,913,768, or

28.22%. Deposit rates were lowered through out the year to reflect the changes in interest rates resulting

in lower interest paid. Interest expense on borrowed funds increased $58,291, or 8.47% for the year

ended December 31, 2008 totaling $746,875 as compared to $688,584 at December 31, 2007. The

increase was primarily due to the increase in borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

During 2008, the Company added $3,123,000 to the allowance for loan losses and realized net

charge-offs of $1,557,503 resulting in an allowance for loan losses totaling $4,925,500, or 2.13% of

total loans. Like most community banks Ledyard saw an increase in charge-offs and non-performing

loans during 2008, resulting in an increase in the allowance. The determination of an appropriate level 

of allowance for loan losses (the “allowance”), is based on management’s judgment of the adequacy

of the allowance based on various factors and a review of the Company’s loan portfolio. An evaluation 

net income
(in thousands)

earnings
per share

(in dollars)

TOTAL 
REVENUE
(in thousands)

$4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

$4.00

3.50

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

$25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

14

management’s financial discussion (continued)

of the adequacy of the allowance is performed each quarter by  management. Management believes that

the allowance at December 31, 2008 was appropriate given the current economic conditions in the

Company’s service area. 

Non-interest income totaled $6,449,069 in 2008 as compared to $6,754,146 in 2007, a decrease of

$305,077, or 4.52%. Income from the Company’s Ledyard Financial Advisors Division totaled $4,895,381,

down from $5,026,952 in 2007, a decrease of $131,571, or 2.62%. This decrease in revenue was a result

of market conditions during 2008. Service fees and other non-interest income decreased slightly by

$173,506 during 2008. Non-interest expense totaled $13,149,945 for 2008 as compared to $12,305,817

in 2007, an increase of $844,128, or 6.86%. 

Financial Condition

At year-end, total assets were $363,345,236 compared to $325,805,353 at December 31, 2007, an

increase of $37,539,883, or 11.52%. The change in assets consisted primarily of a decrease of $2,373,882

in net loans, including loans held for sale and an increase of $33,391,673 in cash and cash equivalents,

securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity (“investments”).

The Company maintains investments in fed funds sold and investment securities in order to diversify

its revenue, as well as to provide interest rate and credit risk diversification. These investments also provide

for liquidity and funding needs. As mentioned above, total investments increased $33,391,673, or

39.72%. This increase consisted of a decrease to cash and cash equivalents of $5,998,156 and increases

in securities available for sale of $21,646,610 and securities held to maturity of $17,743,219. During

2008, the Company purchased $56,620,331 of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities and

realized proceeds from maturities and paydowns of available for sale and held to maturity securities

totaling $17,355,996.

The Company provides loans to customers primarily located within its geographic market area.

Net loans, including loans held for sale, totaled $226,405,155 at December 31, 2008, a $2,373,882,

or 1.04% decrease from a year ago. This decrease reflects the general slow down in lending activity due

to economic conditions.   

Commercial loans consist of (i) loans secured by various corporate assets, (ii) loans to provide

working capital in the form of secured and unsecured lines of credit, and (iii) commercial real estate 

loans secured by income-producing commercial real estate. The Company focuses on lending to 

financially-sound small and medium-sized business customers within its geographic marketplace. 

Total commercial loans decreased by $6,634,758, or 4.57%, during 2008. 

Ledyard Financial Advisors
gross income
(in thousands)

total ASSETS
(in thousands)

net loans
including loans held for sale
(in thousands)

$6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

$400,000

350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

$400,000

350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

15

management’s financial discussion (concluded)

Residential real estate loans consist of loans secured by one-to-four family residences. The Company

usually retains adjustable-rate mortgages in its portfolio and will generally sell fixed-rate mortgages.

Residential real estate loans increased by $4,190,296, or 5.15%, in 2008.  

Consumer loans are originated by the Company for a wide variety of purposes designed to meet the

needs of its customers. Consumer loans include overdraft protection, automobile, boat, recreation vehicles,

home equity, and secured and unsecured personal loans. Consumer loans increased by $989,601, or

19.20%, in 2008. 

Other assets totaled $7,194,460 at December 31, 2008 as compared to $2,227,491 at December

31, 2007. The net increase of $4,966,969 can be attributed to bank owned life insurance purchased

during 2008. This insurance is a tax-free method for funding employee benefits.

Deposits continue to represent the Company’s primary source of funds. In 2008, total deposits

increased by $18,652,078, or 6.74% over 2007, ending the year at $295,585,570. Comparing year-end

balances in 2008 to 2007, demand deposits increased by $4,510,915, NOW accounts decreased by

$1,495,800, certificates of deposit increased by $3,256,081 and money market and savings accounts

increased by $12,380,882. 

Borrowings supplement deposits as a source of liquidity. In addition to borrowings from the FHLB,

the Company purchases federal funds and sells securities under agreements to repurchase. Total 

borrowings were $36,295,903 at December 31, 2008 compared to $16,310,681 at December 31, 2007,

an increase of $19,985,222. The borrowings were distributed between securities sold under agreements to

repurchase and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. In addition to  the liquidity sources discussed

above, the Company believes the investment portfolio and residential loan portfolio provide a significant

amount of contingent liquidity that could be accessed in a reasonable time period through sales if needed.

The Company believes that the level of liquidity is sufficient to meet current and future funding require-

ments.

Shareholders’ equity was $31,283,345 on December 31, 2008 compared to $30,517,338 on

December 31, 2007, an increase of $766,007. The increase was primarily attributable to net income of

$2,027,744 less $1,267,222 in cash dividends to the Company’s shareholders and a decrease of $223,805

from the repurchase of Company stock. The Company’s book value per share on December 31, 2008 was

$30.61 per share based on 1,021,510 shares outstanding, an increase of $0.66 per share from 
a year earlier. (cid:2)

total 
deposits
(in thousands)

book value
per share
(in dollars)

shareholders’
equity
(in thousands)

$400,000

350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

$35

30

25

20

15

10

5

$35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

Gregory D. Steverson
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

16

independent auditors’ report

BOARD of DIRECTORS and SHAREHOLDERS
LEDYARD FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARY

W

e have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ledyard Financial Group, Inc. and

Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated state-

ments of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These

consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility

is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards. Those 

standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether

the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test

basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also

includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, 

as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a

reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material

respects, the consolidated financial position of Ledyard Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as of

December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated

cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker

Portland, Maine

February 18, 2009

17

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2008 and 2007

ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold

Total cash and cash equivalents

Securities available-for-sale
Securities held-to-maturity

Nonmarketable equity securities

Loans held for sale

2008

2007

$

25,428,627
29,596

$

7,931,388
23,524,991

25,458,223

31,456,379

52,127,162
39,877,414

30,480,552
22,134,195

2,010,900

1,091,100

832,000

200,000

Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,925,500

in 2008 and $3,360,003 in 2007 

225,573,155

228,579,037

Accrued interest receivable 

Bank premises and equipment, net

Other assets

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits

Demand
NOW accounts
Money market accounts
Savings
Time, $100,000 and over
Other time

Total deposits

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

1,325,024

8,946,898

7,194,460

1,295,380

8,341,219

2,227,491

$ 363,345,236

$ 325,805,353

$

51,383,486
46,278,989
110,456,277
14,154,479
24,500,517
48,811,822
295,585,570

14,427,836
21,868,067
180,418

$

46,872,571
47,774,789
99,230,628
12,999,246
31,947,282
38,108,976
276,933,492

14,759,226
1,551,455
2,043,842

Total liabilities

332,061,891

295,288,015

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15)

Shareholders’ equity

Common stock, $1.00 par value; 5,500,000 shares authorized;
1,021,510 and 1,018,996 shares issued at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively

Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost; 5,500 shares at December 31, 2008
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income

Total shareholders’ equity

1,021,510
9,733,765
(223,805)
20,508,054

243,821  

1,018,996
9,577,926
–
19,747,532
172,884

31,283,345

30,517,338

$ 363,345,236

$ 325,805,353

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

18

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Interest and dividend income

Interest and fees on loans
Investment securities
Other interest-earning assets

Total interest and dividend income

Interest expense
Deposits
Borrowed funds

Total interest expense

Net interest income

Provision for loan losses

2008

2007

$

14,818,873
3,376,241
312,182

$

16,079,947
2,246,570
1,624,360

18,507,296

19,950,877

4,868,601
746,875

5,615,476

6,782,369
688,584

7,470,953

12,891,820

12,479,924

3,123,000

705,000

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

9,768,820

11,774,924

Noninterest income

Ledyard Financial Advisors division income
Service fees
Other

Total noninterest income

Noninterest expense

Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Other general and administrative

Total noninterest expense

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average numbers of shares outstanding

4,895,381
912,925
640,763

6,449,069

7,212,227
2,732,058
3,205,660

5,026,952
1,122,831
604,363

6,754,146

6,852,143
2,060,396
3,393,278

13,149,945

12,305,817

3,067,944

1,040,200

2,027,744

1.99
1.98
1,020,926

$

$
$

6,223,253

2,361,600

3,861,653

3.80
3.77
1,016,331

$

$
$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

19

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of CHANGES in SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

COMMON
STOCK

ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL

TREASURY
STOCK

ACCUMULATED
OTHER
RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
EARNINGS

TOTAL

Balance, December 31, 2006

$ 1,010,246 $ 9,279,378 $

– $ 17,066,764

$

(85,393) $27,270,995

Comprehensive income

Net income

Change in net unrealized 

depreciation on securities 
available-for-sale, net 
of tax of $133,000

Total comprehensive 

income

Cash dividends paid, 
$1.16 per share

Fair value of stock warrants 
vested during the year

Stock warrants exercised, 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

92,000

8,750 shares

8,750

206,548

Balance, December 31, 2007

$ 1,018,996 

9,577,926 

Comprehensive income

Net income

Change in net unrealized 

appreciation on securities 
available-for-sale, net 
of tax of $36,543

Total comprehensive 

income

Cash dividends paid, 
$1.24 per share

Stock repurchase (5,500 shares)

Fair value of stock warrants 
vested during the year

Stock warrants exercised, 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

80,960

2,514 shares

2,514

74,879

–

3,861,653

–

3,861,653

–

–

–

–

–

– 

–

–

–

–

(223,805)

–

–

–

258,277

258,277

3,861,653 

258,277 

4,119,930

(1,180,885)

–

–

–

–

–

(1,180,885)

92,000

215,298

19,747,532 

172,884 

30,517,338

2,027,744

–

2,027,744

–

70,937

70,937

2,027,744

70,937

2,098,681

(1,267,222)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(1,267,222)

(223,805)

80,960

77,393

Balance, December 31, 2008 $ 1,021,510 $ 9,733,765 $

(223,805) $ 20,508,054

$

243,821 $31,283,345

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

20

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash 

provided by operating activities

Depreciation and amortization or accretion
Provision for loan losses
Deferred income tax benefit
Fair value of stock warrants vested during the year
Increase in accrued interest receivable
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
(Decrease) increase in other assets
Net (increase) decrease in loans held for sale

2008

2007

$

2,027,744

$

3,861,653

662,687
3,123,000
(741,600)
80,960
(29,644)
(1,863,424)
538,088
(632,000)

643,772
705,000
(353,100)
92,000
(213,423)
982,897
(403,132)
1,602,750

Net cash provided by operating activities

3,165,811

6,918,417

Cash flows from investing activities

Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities held-to-maturity
Net (purchase) redemption of FHLB stock
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
Purchase of securities held-to-maturity
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
Net decrease (increase) in loans to customers
Purchase of premises and equipment

10,070,870
7,285,126
(919,800)
(31,539,751)
(25,080,580)
(5,000,000)
82,882
(1,286,380)

6,891,222
5,270,647
1,550
(17,277,463)
–
–
(12,218,256)
(307,522)

Net cash used by investing activities

(46,387,633)

(17,639,822)

Cash flows from financing activities 

Net increase in deposits
Proceeds from long-term FHLB borrowings
Repayment of long-term FHLB borrowings
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants
Cash dividends paid on common stock

18,652,078
21,500,000
(1,183,388)
(331,390)
(223,805)
77,393
(1,267,222)

5,791,298
–
(1,662,630)
(2,630,313)
–
215,298
(1,180,885)

Net cash provided by financing activities

37,223,666

532,768

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(5,998,156)

(10,188,637)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

Supplementary cash flow information:

Interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds

Income taxes paid

Non-cash transaction: Loan transferred to OREO

31,456,379

41,645,016

$

25,458,223

$

$

$

5,579,872

1,875,000

200,000

$

$

$

$

31,456,379

7,451,246

2,391,836

–

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

21

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

NATURE OF BUSINESS
Ledyard Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) is headquartered in Hanover, New Hampshire and, as a bank holding company, it

provides financial services to its customers through its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Ledyard National Bank (the Bank). The Bank

provides retail and commercial banking and investment and trust services through its office locations in Central New Hampshire

and Vermont. 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies of the Company are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and general 

practices within the banking industry. The following is a description of the more significant policies.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary.

All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. With the required regulatory approval, the

Company became the bank holding company of Ledyard National Bank effective in October 2007.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to

make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and

liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the

allowance for loan losses and the valuation of other real estate owned. In connection with the determination of the allowance,

management obtains independent appraisals for collateral securing significant loans. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a

substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in local market conditions.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary

based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,

periodically review the Bank’s loan portfolio. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based

on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company’s operations are affected by various risk factors, including interest rate risk, credit risk, and risk from geographic

concentration of lending activities. Management attempts to manage interest rate risk through various asset/liability management

techniques designed to match maturities of assets and liabilities. Loan policies and administration are designed to provide 

assurance that loans will only be granted to creditworthy borrowers, although credit losses are expected to occur because of 

subjective factors beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio and economic 

conditions are stable, most of its lending activities are conducted within the geographic area where it is located. As a result, the

Company and its borrowers may be especially vulnerable to the consequences of changes in the local economy. In addition, a

substantial portion of the Company’s loans are secured by real estate.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, and federal 

funds sold.

The Company’s due from bank accounts, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any

losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant risk on cash and cash equivalents. 

22

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Investment Securities

Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and 

carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the period to call or maturity using 

methods approximating the interest method. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity, including equity securities with readily

determinable fair values, are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Nonmarketable equity securities, 

consisting of stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank, are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment.

Unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are reported as a net amount in other comprehensive income or loss,

net of tax. Declines in the fair value of investment securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are

reflected in earnings as realized losses. Cost of securities is recognized using the specific identification method. 

Loans Held for Sale

Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the

aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income.

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are stated at the

amount of unpaid principal, reduced by deferred loan fees and an allowance for loan losses.

Loans past due 30 days or more are considered delinquent. Management is responsible to initiate immediate collection efforts to

minimize delinquency and any eventual adverse impact on the Company.

In general, consumer loans will be charged off if the loan is delinquent for 120 consecutive days. Commercial and real estate

loans are charged off in part or in full if they are considered uncollectible.

Loans considered to be impaired are reduced to the present value of expected future cash flows or to the fair value of collateral,

by allocating a portion of the allowance for loan losses to such loans. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to

require an increase, such increase is reported as provision for loan losses. Small balance homogeneous loans are collectively 

evaluated for impairment. 

Loan interest income is accrued daily on the outstanding balances. Accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is specifically

determined to be impaired or management believes, after considering collection efforts and other factors that the borrower’s

financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any unpaid interest previously accrued on those loans is reversed

from income. Interest income is generally not recognized on specific impaired loans unless the likelihood of further loss is remote.

Interest payments received on such loans are generally applied as a reduction of the loan principal balance. Interest income on

other nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest payments received. Loans are returned to accrual status when

all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct origination costs are being deferred and the net amount amortized as

an adjustment of the related loan’s yield. The Company is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life. 

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses

inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan

portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans,

and economic conditions. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value

of estimated cash flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by

charge-offs, net of recoveries.

23

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Credit Related Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under

credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded

when they are funded.

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate properties acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at the lower of the carrying amount or

fair value less estimated selling cost at the date of foreclosure. Any write-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of

acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. 

After foreclosure, these assets are carried at the lower of their new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Costs of significant

property improvements are capitalized, whereas costs relating to holding property are expensed. Valuations are periodically 

performed by management, and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce 

the carrying value of a property to the lower of its cost or fair value less cost to sell.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The provision for depreciation 

is computed over the estimated useful life of the related asset, principally by the straight-line method. Improvements to leased 

property are amortized over the lesser of the term of the lease or life of the improvements. 

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities

are established for the temporary differences between the book bases and the tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities at

enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the amounts related to such temporary differences are realized or settled.

Adjustments to the Company’s deferred tax assets are recognized as deferred income tax expense or benefit based on manage-

ment’s judgment relating to the realizability of such assets.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share data is computed based on the weighted average number of the Company’s common shares outstand-

ing during the year. Potential common stock is considered in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted

earnings per share, and is determined using the treasury stock method.

Stock Warrant Plans

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123

(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123(R) requires entities issuing stock options in exchange for services to 

measure the fair value of the options at the grant date and to recognize the fair value of those options as expense, generally over

the period in which they vest. On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) using a modified

prospective application. Using this application, SFAS No. 123(R) applies to options granted or modified in periods beginning after

December 15, 2005. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of outstanding options for which requisite service has not

been rendered as of the effective date shall be recognized as the service is rendered on or after the effective date. 

Ledyard Financial Advisors Assets and Fees

Assets held by Ledyard Financial Advisors (a division of Ledyard National Bank) for its customers, other than trust cash on deposit

at the Bank, are not included in these financial statements because they are not assets of the Bank. Fees that Ledyard Financial

Advisors earns are recorded on the accrual basis.

24

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although

certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate

component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive

income.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty 

in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Company’s financial 

statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a minimum recognition threshold 

and measurement attributed for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax provision taken or expected to 

be taken in a tax return. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company

implemented FIN 48 during 2008 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a

framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about

fair value measurements. This Statement was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008, and it did not have a material

impact on the Company’s financial statements. In February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2 which delays 

by one year the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for certain types of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. In October

2008, FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.

FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key 

considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.

Business Segments

SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, requires public companies to report (i) 

certain financial and descriptive information about “reportable operating segments”, as defined, and (ii) certain enterprise-wide

financial information. Operating segment information is reported using a “management approach” that is based on the way

management organizes the segments for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance.

The Company’s two primary business segments are banking and wealth advisory services.

Banking consists principally of lending to commercial and consumer customers, as well as deposit gathering activities. 

Wealth Advisory Services includes, as its principal business lines, financial planning services, investment management services, 

personal tax services, trustee services and estate planning.

The Company’s business segment disclosure is based on information generated by an internal profitability reporting system,

which generates information by business segment based on the needs of management responsible for managing those 

segments. Allocations between the business segments can be subjective in nature are reviewed and refined as circumstances 

warrant. Any allocations that may affect the reported results of any business segment will not affect the consolidated financial

position or results of operations of the Company as a whole. The Company does not allocate assets by segment.

25

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (concluded)
The following tables provide selected financial information for the Company’s business segments:

Year ended December 31, 2008:
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income

Year ended December 31, 2007:
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income

BANKING

$ 12,891,820
3,123,000
1,553,688
9,454,327
1,868,181
633,415
1,234,765

$ 12,479,924
705,000
1,727,194
9,087,410
4,414,708
1,675,293
2,739,415

$

WEALTH
ADVISORY
SERVICES

-
-
4,895,381
3,695,617
1,199,764
406,785
792,980

$              -
-
5,026,952
3,218,407
1,808,545
686,307
1,122,238

TOTAL
CONSOLIDATED

$ 12,891,820
3,123,000
6,449,069
13,149,945
3,067,944
1,040,200
2,027,744

$ 12,479,924
705,000
6,754,146
12,305,817
6,223,253
2,361,600
3,861,653

2. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS 
The Bank is required to maintain certain reserves of vault cash or deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). The amount of

this reserve requirement, included in cash and due from banks, was approximately $96,000 and $679,000 as of December 31,

2008 and 2007, respectively.

3. SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, follow:

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Mortgage-backed securities

2008

AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

$ 4,499,448 
12,621,106 
1,502,335 
33,134,848 

$ 

60,870 
48,591 
48,657 
826,294 

$ 

- 
(560,019) 
- 
(54,968) 

$ 4,560,318
12,109,678
1,550,992
33,906,174

Total securities available-for-sale

$ 51,757,737 

$ 

984,412 

$ 

(614,987) 

$ 52,127,162

Securities Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Mortgage-backed securities

$

992,146 
2,559,875 
786,365 
35,539,028 

$ 

47,931 
13,377 
- 
956,801 

$ 

- 
(40,174) 
(15,246) 
(88,167) 

$  1,040,077
2,533,078
771,119
36,407,662

Total securities held-to-maturity

$ 39,877,414 

$ 1,018,109 

$ 

(143,587) 

$ 40,751,936

26

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SECURITIES (continued)

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Mortgage-backed securities

2007

AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

$ 5,117,527 
6,921,159 
1,809,959 
16,369,960 

$ 

62,653 
43,325 
43,260 
197,647 

$ 

(499) 
(36,413) 
- 
(48,026) 

$  5,179,681
6,928,071
1,853,219
16,519,581

Total securities available-for-sale

$ 30,218,605 

$ 

346,885 

$ 

(84,938) 

$ 30,480,552

Securities Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Mortgage-backed securities

$ 

$ 1,987,287 
2,060,744 
785,909
17,300,255 

22,476 
15,691
- 
29,306 

$ 

(1,082) 
- 
(12,132) 
(183,548) 

$ 2,008,681
2,076,435
773,777
17,146,013

Total securities held-to-maturity

$ 22,134,195 

$ 

67,473 

$ 

(196,762) 

$ 22,004,906

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, securities with a carrying value of $44,332,360 and $28,269,949, respectively, were pledged

to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2008 follow:

Within one year
Over one year through five years
Over five years through ten years
Over ten years

Collateralized mortgage obligations and 

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE

HELD-TO-MATURITY

AMORTIZED
COST

FAIR
VALUE

AMORTIZED
COST

FAIR
VALUE

$ 5,435,059 
1,035,919 
943,764 
9,705,812 
17,120,554 

$  5,497,440 
1,071,749 
938,313 
9,162,494 
16,669,996 

$  1,820,569 
992,146 
501,297 
238,009 
3,552,021 

$  1,833,946
1,040,077
472,205
226,927
3,573,155

mortgage-backed securities

34,637,183 

35,457,166 

36,325,393 

37,178,781

Total

$ 51,757,737 

$ 52,127,162 

$ 39,877,414 

$ 40,751,936

There were no sales of securities available-for-sale or securities held-to-maturity during 2008 and 2007.

27

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SECURITIES (concluded)
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2008 and 2007 aggregated by investment 

category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:

December 31, 2008

U.S. Government 

LESS THAN 12 MONTHS

12 MONTHS OR GREATER

TOTAL

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

sponsored enterprises

$

– $

– $

– $

–

$

– $

9,224,486 

(511,148) 

774,252 

(89,045) 

9,998,738 

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

–
(600,193)

State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage 

obligations

Mortgage-backed securities

–
10,748,153 

–

(100,936) 

771,119 
1,068,901 

(15,246) 
(42,199) 

771,119 
11,817,054 

(15,246)
(143,135)

Total

$19,972,639 

$ (612,084)  $  2,614,272  $

(146,490)  $ 22,586,911  $ 

(758,574)

December 31, 2007

U.S. Government 

LESS THAN 12 MONTHS

12 MONTHS OR GREATER

TOTAL

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR VALUE

sponsored enterprises

$

–  $ 

–  $  1,997,675  $ 

(1,581)  $  1,997,675  $ 

3,261,976 

(36,413) - 

– 

–

3,261,976 

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

(1,581)
(36,413)

State and municipal
Collateralized mortgage 

obligations

Mortgage-backed securities

–
–

–
–

773,777 
16,204,699 

(12,132) 7

773,777 
(231,574) 1 16,204,699 

(12,132)
(231,574)

Total

$ 3,261,976  $ 

(36,413)  $  18,976,151  $

(245,287) $ 22,238,127  $

(281,700)

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when

economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which

the fair value has been less than cost; (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and (3) the intent and

ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery 

in fair value.

These unrealized losses related principally to current interest rates for similar types of securities. In analyzing an issuer’s financial

condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether down-

grades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. As management has

the ability to hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future if classified as available-for-sale, no declines are

deemed to be other-than-temporary.

28

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

4. LOANS
The composition of net loans at December 31 is as follows:

Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential real estate
Consumer
Loans held for sale

Subtotal

Allowance for loan losses
Net deferred loan costs

Loans, net

2008

2007

$

53,586,089
85,134,729
85,563,589
6,143,308
832,000

$

69,948,886
75,406,690
81,373,293
5,153,707
200,000

231,259,715

232,082,576

(4,925,500)
70,940

(3,360,003)
56,464

$ 226,405,155

$ 228,779,037

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, nonaccrual loans were $3,502,128 and $1,433,668, respectively. There were no loans 90 days

past due and still accruing interest at December 31, 2008 and 2007.

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses follows:

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

Balance at beginning of year
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously charged off

Balance at end of year

$

$

3,360,003
3,123,000
(1,605,706)
48,203

2,784,125
705,000
(142,113)
12,991

$

4,925,500

$

3,360,003

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:  

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

Total impaired loans

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans

Average investment in impaired loans

$

$

$

$

795,923
3,371,989

4,167,912

919,927

3,381,165

$

$

$

$

–
2,594,417

2,594,417

750,480

1,557,473

Interest income recognized on impaired loans during 2008 and 2007 amounted to $43,099 and $123,592, respectively. No 

additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans. 

29

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

5. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of premises and equipment follows:

Land and improvements
Buildings and improvements
Equipment

Accumulated depreciation

2008

2007

$

1,922,993
7,753,992
4,758,643

14,435,628
(5,488,730)

$

1,922,993
7,224,331
4,001,924

13,149,248
(4,808,029)

$

8,946,898

$

8,341,219

Depreciation, included in occupancy and equipment expense, amounted to $680,701 and $610,611 for the years ended

December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

Pursuant to the terms of noncancelable lease agreements in effect at December 31, 2008, pertaining to premises and equipment,

future minimum rent commitments under various operating leases are as follows:

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Thereafter

$

473,033
464,233
420,233
376,402
319,986
1,244,821

$

3,298,708

The leases contain options to extend for periods from three to ten years. The cost of such extensions is not included above. Total
rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $449,397 and $169,505, respectively.  

6. DEPOSITS
At December 31, 2008, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

$

61,634,234
11,085,956
334,809
126,848
130,492

$

73,312,339

Deposit accounts with related parties were $7,348,263 and $4,663,033 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  

7. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under repurchase agreements mature within twelve months and are collateralized by securities in the Bank’s 

investment portfolio. All securities collateralizing the repurchase agreements are under the Bank’s control. The maximum amount

of repurchase agreements outstanding at any month-end during 2008 and 2007 was $15,286,776 and $25,599,539, respectively.

The average amount of repurchase agreements outstanding during 2008 and 2007 was $13,278,500 and $16,702,183, 

respectively. The weighted average interest rate on repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was

1.60% and 3.59%, respectively. 

30

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

8. ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
The Bank’s fixed-rate advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of $21,868,067 at December 31, 2008 mature through

2013. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, interest rates of fixed-rate advances ranged from 2.67% to 4.33%.

Outstanding FHLB borrowings are secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral consisting primarily of loans with first 

mortgages secured by one to four family properties, certain unencumbered investment securities, and other qualified assets.

The contractual maturities of advances are as follows:

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

Total

2008

2007

$

$

6,599,037
4,750,000
5,000,000
2,750,000
2,769,030

–
500,000
733,489
–
317,966

$

21,868,067

$

1,551,455

9. INCOME TAXES
Allocation of federal and state income taxes between current and deferred portions is as follows:

Current tax expense

Federal
State

Deferred tax benefit

Federal
State

2008

2007

$

1,383,300
398,500
1,781,800

$

2,422,000
292,700
2,714,700

(601,100)
(140,500)
(741,600)

(318,400)
(34,700)
(353,100)

$

1,040,200

$

2,361,600

The income tax provision differs from the expense that would result from applying federal statutory rates to income before

income taxes, as follows:

Computed tax expense
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:

Tax exempt income
State taxes, net of federal benefit
Income from life insurance
Incentive stock options
Other

2008

2007

$

1,043,101

$

2,115,906

(171,210)
170,281
(77,933)
27,528
48,433

(80,169)
197,386
(8,226)
31,280
105,423

$

1,040,200

$

2,361,600

31

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

9. INCOME TAXES (concluded)
The components of the net deferred tax asset, included in other assets, are as follows:

Deferred tax assets

Allowance for loan losses
Employee benefit plans
Other

Deferred tax liabilities

Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale
Depreciation
Other

2008

2007

$

1,681,000
325,800
131,200

2,138,000

125,600
134,100
134,500

394,200

$

1,175,700
261,500
35,400

1,472,600

89,000
225,200
126,300

440,500

Net deferred tax asset

$

1,743,800

$

1,032,100

No valuation allowance is deemed necessary for the deferred income tax asset.

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for 2008 and 2007:

2008

2007

Net income, as reported

$

2,027,744

$

3,861,653

Weighted-average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive employee stock options
Effect of unvested stock grant

Adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversion

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

1,020,926
–
1,150

1,022,076

1,016,331
6,574
450

1,023,355

$
$

1.99
1.98

$
$

3.80
3.77

There are 38,300 employee stock options excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share for 2008 since inclusion of

these common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.

32

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing

needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commit-

ments to extend credit, standby and commercial letters-of-credit, and interest rate caps and floors written on adjustable rate loans.

Such instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the

balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in 

particular classes of financial instruments. 

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commit-

ments to extend credit and standby letters-of-credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The

Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet 

instruments. For interest rate caps and floors written on adjustable rate loans, the contract or notional amounts do not represent

exposure to credit losses. 

The Company generally requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the following financial instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

Commitments to grant loans

Commercial and standby letters-of-credit

CONTRACT AMOUNT

2008

2007

$

$

50,685,785

3,298,627

$

$

52,963,883

3,858,605

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established 

in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. 

The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do

not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is

based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. 

Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not 

necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit

evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment,

and income-producing commercial property.

Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a

third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing let-

ters-of-credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

At times, the Company places interest rate caps and floors on loans written by the Company to enable customers to transfer, 

modify, or reduce their interest rate risk.

33

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

12. LEGAL CONTINGENCIES
Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business which, in the opinion of management, will have no

material effect on the Company’s financial statements.  

13. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and its bank subsidiary are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB and the Office

of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in mandatory and possible

additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated

financial statements.

These capital requirements represent quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items

as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative

judgments by its regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts

and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital to 

average assets (as defined). Management believes that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company and its bank subsidiary meet all

capital requirements to which they are subject. As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized

the banking subsidiary as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well

capitalized, a financial institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in

the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s

category. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Bank are presented below. The capital ratios for the Company are not materially 

different from those presented below. 

ACTUAL

AMOUNT

RATIO

MINIMUM
CAPITAL
REQUIREMENT

AMOUNT

RATIO
(dollars in thousands)

MINIMUM
TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTION PROVISIONS

AMOUNT

RATIO

33,691

14.5% 

$  18,601 

8.0% 

$ 23,252 

10.0%

30,753 

13.2% 

$ 

9,301 

4.0% 

$  13,951 

6.0%

30,753 

8.9% 

$  13,823 

4.0% 

$  17,279 

5.0%

32,804 

14.1% 

$  18,580 

8.0% 

$  23,225 

10.0%

29,895 

12.9% 

$ 

9,290 

4.0% 

$  13,935 

6.0%

29,895 

9.3% 

$  12,912 

4.0% 

$  16,141 

5.0%

December 31, 2008
Total Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Average Assets

December 31, 2007
Total Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Risk-Weighted Assets

Tier 1 Capital to 

Average Assets

$

$

$

$

$

$

34

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

13. MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (concluded)

The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends depends on the receipt of dividends from its banking subsidiary. The Company,

as the sole shareholder of the banking subsidiary, is entitled to dividends from legally available funds when and as declared by the

banking subsidiary’s Board of Directors.

In December 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the 2007 Common Stock Repurchase Program, which permits

the Company to purchase 30,000 shares of its authorized and issued common stock for a one-year period, expiring on December

13, 2008. The authority may be exercised from time to time and in such amounts as market conditions warrant. Any repurchases

are intended to make appropriate adjustments to the Company’s capital structure, including meeting share requirements related to

employee benefit plans and for general corporate purposes. The Company is dependent on dividends from its banking subsidiary

to fund these share repurchases.

14. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Company sponsors a 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers all employees who are at least 21 years of age and who have

completed one year of employment. Eligible employees contribute a percentage of their annual compensation to the 401(k) plan

and the Company matches a certain portion of employee contributions. In addition, the Company may make discretionary contri-

butions on behalf of employees under the plan. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, expense attributable to the

plan amounted to $322,556 and $580,082, respectively.

Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are liabilities established

pursuant to deferred compensation agreements with certain officers of the Company of $822,487 and $660,272, respectively.

Deferred compensation expense related to these plans amounted to $179,316 and $121,896 for the years ended December 31,

2008 and 2007, respectively.

15. WARRANTS
Warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at various exercise prices have been granted to certain members of

the organizing group, key management, and employees of the Company prior to April 2006. The warrants vest in three years

and expire ten years from the date the warrant was granted.

On April 19, 2006, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2006 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “current plan”).

The maximum number of shares of stock reserved and available for issuance under this Plan is 50,000 shares. Awards may be

granted in the form of incentive stock options and restricted stock, or any combinations of the preceding, and the exercise price

shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant. No stock options are exercisable more than ten years

after the date the stock option is granted. The stock options vest over a three-year period.

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) for the incentive stock option and restricted stock

grants relating to the current plan and previous plans. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company

recorded $80,960 and $92,000 of compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Total compensation expense related to nonvested awards not yet recognized is $98,361 as of December 31, 2008 and is 

expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

Under the current plan, the Company granted 850 shares of restricted stock in 2008 with a fair value of $49.19 at grant date.

This grant vests over three years and, combined with 300 shares from 2007, comprises the Company’s nonvested restricted stock

awards at December 31, 2008. The Company granted 450 shares of restricted stock in 2007 with a fair value of $43.95 at grant

date of which 150 shares vested during 2008. The grant vests over three years. At the closing price on December 31, 2008 of

$37.05, the total fair value of restricted stock awards vested during 2008 was $5,557. The weighted-average grant date fair

value of the 1,150 nonvested restricted stock awards at December 31, 2008 was $47.82.

35

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

15. WARRANTS (concluded)
The fair value of warrants granted during 2008 and 2007 was $4.02 and $7.22, respectively. The fair value of each warrant

granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted-average

assumptions: 

Dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life
Expected volatility

2008

2007

3.35%
3.77%
10 Years
10.62%

2.30%
4.05%
10 Years
6.49%

The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of a peer group of similar entities.

A summary of warrant activity as of December 31, 2008 and changes during the year then ended is presented below: 

Outstanding at beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

Exercisable at December 31, 2008

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE

43.28
37.00
34.78
34.68

43.77

41.53

SHARES

40,225
1,000
(2,364)
(561)

38,300

28,600

$

$

$

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL
LIFE

AGGREGATE
INTRINSIC
VALUE

6.3 years

$

$

$

33,130

–

–

The aggregate intrinsic value of warrants exercised during 2008 and 2007 was $33,130 and $140,306, respectively.

Information pertaining to warrants outstanding at December 31, 2008 is as follows:

WARRANTS OUTSTANDING

WARRANTS EXERCISABLE

RANGE OF
EXERCISE PRICES

NUMBER
OUTSTANDING

$32.00 - $41.84
$43.95 - $53.52
Outstanding at
end of year

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL LIFE

5.1 years
8.7 years

26,000
12,300

38,300

6.3 years

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE

$

$

39.74
52.28

43.77

NUMBER
EXERCISABLE

24,500
4,100

28,600

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE

$

$

39.73
52.28

41.53

The remaining number of warrants available to be granted was 51,911 and 53,200 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

36

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

16. OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES
The components of other noninterest income and expenses which are in excess of 1% of total revenues (total interest and 

dividend income and noninterest income) and not shown separately in the statements of income are as follows for the years

ended December 31:

Income

Gain on sale of loans

Expenses

Credit card charges
Advertising

2008

2007

$

$

$

158,754

–
374,153

374,153

$

$

$

286,184

288,797
319,481

608,278

17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has had, and may be expected to have in the future, transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors,

principal officers, their immediate families and affiliated companies in which they are principal shareholders (commonly referred

to as related parties), all of which have been, in the opinion of management, on the same terms, including interest rates and 

collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with others. Loans granted to related parties amounted to

$1,187,307 and $1,348,200 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

During January 2007, the banking subsidiary entered into a long-term lease with a company whose sole owner is a director and

shareholder of the Company. This lease is for space that is the new headquarters for the Bank’s Ledyard Financial Advisors 

division. The lease has an initial term of 10 years and calls for initial annual payments of $320,000. The lease has three five-year

options to renew.

18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The Statement defines fair value, establishes a

framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures

about fair value measurements. 

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit

price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants

on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of

observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of

inputs that may be used to measure fair value: 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of

the measurement date. 

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted

prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. 

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market 

participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

37

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.

Assets:

Securities available for sale

(market approach)

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 2008, USING

QUOTED PRICES
IN ACTIVE
MARKETS FOR
IDENTICAL ASSETS
( LEVEL 1 )

SIGNIFICANT
OTHER
OBSERVABLE
INPUTS
( LEVEL 2 )

SIGNIFICANT
UNOBSERVABLE
INPUTS
( LEVEL 3 )

DECEMBER 31,
2008

$ 52,127,162 

$  5,226,319 

$ 46,900,843 

$ 

–

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below.

Assets:

Impaired loans

(market approach)

Loans held for sale

(market approach)

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 2008, USING

QUOTED PRICES
IN ACTIVE
MARKETS FOR
IDENTICAL ASSETS
( LEVEL 1 )

SIGNIFICANT
OTHER
OBSERVABLE
INPUTS
( LEVEL 2 )

SIGNIFICANT
UNOBSERVABLE
INPUTS
( LEVEL 3 )

DECEMBER 31,
2008

$ 3,247,185 

$

832,000 

$ 

$ 

– 

– 

$  3,247,185 

$ 

832,000 

$ 

$ 

–

–

Impaired loans were written down to their fair value of $3,247,185, resulting in an impairment charge through the provision for

loan losses, which was included in earnings for the period. Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value with

any resulting adjustment to fair value included in earnings for the period.

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a

forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no 

quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair

values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the

assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be

realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. 

SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which prescribes fair value disclosures, excludes certain

financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value

amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.

Securities: Fair values for securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock, are determined by

obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique

used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather 

38

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008 and 2007

18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (concluded)
by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank

Stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan

Bank and Federal Reserve Bank. 

Loans held for sale:  Fair values of loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market prices.

Loans receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are

based on carrying values. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates 

currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for nonperforming loans are

estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.  

Deposit liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and

certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e.,

their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit

approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a 

discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregate

expected monthly maturities on time deposits. 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: The carrying amounts of borrowings under repurchase agreements maturing

within ninety days approximate their fair values.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair values of these borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow

analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued interest: The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-balance-sheet instruments: The Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments consist of loan commitments. Fair values

for loan commitments have not been presented as the future revenue derived from such financial instruments is not significant.

The estimated fair values, and related carrying or notional amounts, of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Securities available-for-sale
Securities held-to-maturity
Federal Home Loan Bank and
Federal Reserve Bank stock
Loans and loans held for sale, net
Accrued interest receivable

2008

2007

CARRYING
AMOUNT

FAIR
VALUE

CARRYING
AMOUNT

FAIR
VALUE

$ 25,458,223 
52,127,162 
39,877,414 

$  25,458,223
52,127,162
40,751,936

$ 31,456,379
30,480,552
22,134,195

$ 31,456,379
30,480,552
22,004,906

2,010,900 
226,405,155 
1,325,024 

2,010,900
227,973,766
1,325,024

1,091,100
228,779,037
1,295,380

1,091,100
229,196,631
1,295,380

Financial liabilities
Deposits
Repurchase agreements
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
Accrued interest payable

295,585,570 
14,427,836 
21,868,067 
264,532 

295,768,990
14,427,836
21,590,165
264,532

276,933,492
14,759,226
1,551,455
228,928

278,223,037
14,759,226
1,550,825
228,928

39

BOARD of DIRECTORS and SENIOR MANAGEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

Douglas G. Britton
President, Britton Lumber Co. Inc., and Secretary,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

Andrew A. Samwick                                             
Professor of Economics and Director,
Nelson A. Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College

Cotton M. Cleveland
President, Mather Associates

Richard W. Couch, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Hypertherm, Inc.

L. Joyce Hampers
Attorney, Former U.S. Assistant Secretary
of Commerce and President, Joymark, Inc.;
Retiring – May, 2009                                             

Adam M. Keller
Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Dartmouth College

Dennis E. Logue
Steven Roth Professor of Management Emeritus,
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College and Chair,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

Frederick A. Roesch
Retired, Senior Vice President, Citigroup/Citibank
and Co-Vice Chair, Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

SENIOR MANAGEMENT 

Kathryn G. Underwood
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank 

Gregory D. Steverson                                    
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

Robert T. Boon                       
Executive Vice President and Managing Director,
Ledyard Financial Advisors/Ledyard National Bank 

Martha P. Candon
Senior Vice President and Senior Retail 
Banking Officer, Ledyard National Bank

Jeffrey H. Marks
Senior Vice President, Marketing and 
Client Experience Officer, Ledyard National Bank 

Deirdre Sheerr-Gross, AIA 
Principal, Sheerr and White,
Residential Architecture

Bayne Stevenson
President, Bayson Company

Kathryn G. Underwood
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Ledyard Financial Group/Ledyard National Bank

James W. Varnum
Retired President, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Alliance 
and Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital and
Co-Vice Chair, Ledyard Financial Group/
Ledyard National Bank

Darcy D. Rogers
Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer,
Ledyard National Bank

Darlene E. Romano
Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Finance,
Ledyard National Bank 

Daniel X. Stannard, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Senior Loan Officer,
Ledyard National Bank 

D. Rodman Thomas
Senior Vice President and Director of Client Relations,
Ledyard Financial Advisors/Ledyard National Bank

As of March 6, 2009

For a current listing of Boards, Senior
Management and Officers, please visit the
“About Us” section of our website at
www.ledyardbank.com.

40

Mission Statement

L

edyard National Bank is committed to

being the Financial Services institution of

choice by combining innovation with

unparalleled personalized customer service.

We offer our employees a challenging and

rewarding work experience. As a result 

of our efforts, Ledyard customers receive

superlative financial services and our

shareholders experience consistent and

superior returns.

(cid:2)

LEDYARD NATIONAL BANK 

HANOVER:
38 Main Street | 603-643-2244 |  Lobby, Walk-Up and ATM

Lebanon Street at Park Street | 603-643-7457 Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

Dartmouth College | Collis Center ATM

LEBANON:
Route 120 at Old Etna Road | 603-448-2220 |  Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

Centerra Park/River Valley Club ATM

LYME:
On The Green | 603-795-2288| Lobby and ATM

NEW LONDON:
178 County Road | 603-526-7725 | Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

NORWICH, VERMONT:
320 Main Street | 802-649-2050 | Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM

WEST LEBANON:
67 Main Street | 603-298-9444 | Lobby, Drive-Up and ATM
Powerhouse Mall ATM

WHITE RIVER JUNCTION, VERMONT:
Gateway Motors | Sykes Avenue ATM 

INTERNET BANKING: www.ledyardbank.com

KWIKTEL PHONE BANKING: 1 - 8 8 8 - K W I K T E L   ( 1 - 8 8 8 - 5 9 4 - 5 8 3 5 )

M E M B E R   F D I C

LEDYARD FINANCIAL ADVISORS

HANOVER:
2 Maple Street | 603-643-0044

NEW LONDON:
178 County Road | 603-526-7725

Non-deposit investment products are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed 
by the Bank or any affiliate, and are subject to investment risk including the possible loss of principal amount invested.