Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Asset Management / Legg Mason Inc.

Legg Mason Inc.

lm · NYSE Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker lm
Exchange NYSE
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2014 Annual Report · Legg Mason Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report  |  2014

MOMENTUM

If the wind will not serve, take to the oars.

—Latin proverb

INDEPENDENT INVESTMENT AFFILIATES + GLOBAL RETAIL DISTRIBUTION

London

Frankfurt

Warsaw

Paris

Geneva

Milan

Madrid

Montreal

Toronto

San Francisco

Cincinnati

Pasadena

Boston
Stamford

New York
Philadelphia

Wilmington

Baltimore

Miami

Beijing

Shanghai

Tokyo

Dubai

Hong Kong

Taipei

Singapore

2,800 

EMPLOYEES

29 

CITIES

COUNTRIES MOMENTUM
190 

Investment Centers (21)

Distribution Locations (16)

São Paulo

Santiago

We are one of the world’s largest asset managers. We have a local presence  
in 29 cities around the globe, serving individual and institutional investors 
located in 190 countries across six continents. Our global distribution network, 
combined with our diverse family of specialized investment managers, creates 
a strong platform to deliver performance.

Melbourne

DEAR CLIENTS AND FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

I write you following the completion of my first year as CEO, very pleased 
to share the results of a year of great progress for our Legg Mason.

During this past year, I have been so proud to see our organization move 
forward, together, in service of our clients and shareholders, as we begin 
returning Legg Mason to a position of industry leadership. This new fiscal 
year, it is our commitment to build further on the clear momentum that 
we now enjoy.

Our Fiscal 2014 was a year of difficult but important decisions that 
involved streamlining our Company where appropriate, while adding 
resources and capabilities opportunistically, all with a clear focus on 
“Building a Better Legg Mason” and positioning the Company for 
growth: our number one priority for Fiscal 2015.

As we look ahead, fully appreciating the sacred trust our clients place in 
us, we feel an even greater sense of purpose and determination to help 
solve the financial challenges we all face: achieving financial security and 
growth in what remains a turbulent global economy. 

We strongly believe that we have the talent and resources, properly 
aligned and focused, to help our clients navigate these challenges.

We remain confident that our business model, combining highly-
performing, independent investment managers and global retail distribution, 
is not only differentiated in the marketplace, but distinctive. This model, 
successfully executed, provides the foundation to deliver for clients and, 
in turn, our shareholders, in two essential ways: by achieving compelling 
investment returns in appropriate products and strategies that are 
effectively distributed on a global basis. We are quite pleased to have  
made progress on both investment performance and distribution last year, 
and we expect to build upon those improvements in the year ahead.

We see the Legg Mason of the future with fewer but larger Affiliates, 
focused on delivering compelling investment results for investors, more 
comprehensive investment capabilities that reflect evolving client demand 
and needs, and an increasingly productive operating team to support 
both our Affiliates and global distribution platform. We believe that 
strong execution of this vision will improve our organic AUM growth rate; 
increase revenue generation; and further diversify our business by client, 
asset class and geography to yield increasingly better results for both our 
clients and fellow shareholders this coming year and beyond.

The Year in Review: Change and Action
Our work this past year was one of deliberate action, centered on three 
fundamental imperatives: improving operating productivity, leveraging 
our global distribution platform and strengthening our independent, multi-
Affiliate model to be more competitive and effective.

Leadership Changes —We strengthened our Board of Directors with the 
addition of our new non-executive Chairman, Dennis Kass, and Directors 
John Myers, John Murphy and John Davidson (elected in May), all of  
whom add diverse and broad business and asset management expertise.  

Joseph A. Sullivan
President and Chief Executive Officer

1Legg MasonI’m grateful for the insight and counsel of these new Directors 
and look forward to our collaboration as we progress.

Additionally, I am very pleased that Tom Hoops joined Legg 
Mason to lead the critical business and product development 
effort at the senior executive level. Having most recently 
managed the Affiliated Managers Division within the 
asset management group at Wells Fargo, Tom appreciates 
our diverse, multi-Affiliate model and, as such, is quite 
comfortable and effective in bringing together our Affiliates, 
the executive team and the broader organization around 
common objectives.

Improving Operating Productivity—We introduced 
a LEAN/Six Sigma efficiency initiative to the Company 
that resulted in both short- and long-term benefits to 
the organization. Several hundred employees worldwide 
were trained to lead an evolution of our corporate DNA 
to embrace the practice of Kaizen, or “continuous 
improvement.” The Legg Mason of the future is committed 
to operating the firm with a high degree of efficiency and 
effectiveness, which is more than just a matter of fiscal 
prudence, but also a competitive necessity. This important 
productivity initiative has already yielded a meaningful 
reduction in our spend, which we are redeploying to our 
critical growth engine, Legg Mason Global Distribution.

Leveraging Our Global Distribution Platform—It is clear 
that we now operate in a more complex market environment 
with low real economic growth and interest rates, 
particularly in mature economies. This sober reality means 
that, to accomplish their long-term objectives, investors 
need to consider looking across asset classes and beyond 
the borders of regional geographies in new ways when 
investing. This is the real “new reality” that our investor 
clients face, and the implications for asset managers 
are significant. Size, reach and diversity of products and 

strategies are essential to meet these evolving client needs; 
and managers that offer a broad, truly global perspective and 
investment strategy palette will succeed disproportionately 
in the marketplace. 

We believe that Legg Mason is competitively positioned to 
capture just such opportunity.

While still in modest long-term outflow, we made 
significant progress this past year in distribution across 
the Company, with net long-term asset flows improving 
by approximately $28 billion. Strong performance in both 
our institutional and retail channels was highlighted by 
our global retail platform achieving record gross sales, 
increasing 15% over the prior year. 

Despite that improvement, we believe that we can 
dramatically grow our sales and improve net flows over the 
next few years, but to do so will require thinking and acting 
differently, embracing change as our clients and the markets 
change. Specifically, to better serve a larger and broader set 
of global clients, our sales and client service teams must 
have even deeper product knowledge, listen and engage with 
our clients more effectively, and be better prepared to offer 
innovative products and solutions that meet their needs. 

In addition to working harder and being opportunistic, 
“winning” firms will also need to work smarter, with costs 
for all managers rising, as more is expected of us by clients, 
distribution partners and regulators than ever before.

In working smarter, we are investing thoughtfully and 
strategically to innovate and harness the power of 
technology, enabling us to better understand and serve our 
clients more effectively and efficiently. 

Utilizing technology to collect and analyze client 
segmentation and geographic dispersion data, we created 

The Board’s Perspective
Your Company concluded this fiscal year with strong and 
improving business and financial results. Assets under 
management increased because of positive stock market trends, 
broadly competitive investment performance and dramatic 
improvement in net flows. Rising revenues, continued expense 
discipline and prudent capital management have driven higher 
profitability and favorable absolute and relative returns for 
investors in Legg Mason.

CEO Joe Sullivan has led strategic initiatives to significantly 
enhance investment and distribution capabilities—creating 
a more focused Affiliate lineup, increasing product offerings 
through innovation and acquisitions, and expanding the 
Company’s reach in global distribution channels. Your Board 
enthusiastically supports his plans to foster investment excellence 
firm-wide, improve the quality and efficiency of business 
operations, and accelerate the growth of revenues and profits.

We sincerely thank Harold Adams, John Koerner and John 
Cahill for their superb and diverse contributions as Directors of 
Legg Mason. In the fiscal year, we welcomed two new Directors 
to the Board: John Myers and John Murphy, both veteran 
industry leaders; and in May we welcomed John Davidson, a 
seasoned financial executive and public company director.

The Board will remain vigilant in working to fulfill our 
fiduciary responsibilities of supervision and oversight, on behalf 
of you, the owners of Legg Mason.

Respectfully,

Dennis M. Kass 
Chairman of the Board

2Legg MasonFinancial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Years Ended March 31,

OPERATING RESULTS

Operating revenues

Operating income (loss)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before  

income tax provision (benefit)

Net income (loss) attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.(1)

Adjusted income(2)

PER COMMON SHARE

Net income (loss), diluted(1)

Adjusted income, diluted(2)

Dividends declared

Book Value 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets

Total stockholders’ equity

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

$2,741,757 

$2,612,650 

$2,662,574 

$2,784,317 

$2,634,879 

 430,893 

 (434,499)

 338,753 

 386,808 

 321,183 

 419,641 

 (510,607)

 303,083 

 365,197 

 329,656 

 284,784 

 417,805 

 (353,327)

 347,169 

 220,817 

 397,030 

 253,923 

 439,248 

 204,357 

 381,258 

$         2.33 

$        (2.65)

$         1.54 

$         1.63 

$          1.32 

3.41 

0.52

40.32

2.61 

0.44

38.44

2.77 

0.32

40.59

2.83 

0.20

38.41

2.45 

0.12

35.94

$7,111,349 

$7,269,660 

$8,555,747 

$8,707,756 

$8,622,632 

 4,724,724 

 4,818,351 

 5,677,291 

 5,770,384 

 5,841,724 

(1)  Fiscal 2013 includes non-cash impairment charges related to intangible assets, net of income tax benefits, of $508,252 or $3.81 per share.

(2)  Adjusted income, per diluted share represents a performance measure that is based on a methodology other than generally accepted accounting principles 
(“non-GAAP”).  For  more  information  regarding  this  non-GAAP  financial  measure,  see  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and 
Results of Operations included in this Annual Report.

a differentiated U.S. distribution model. As part of this 
work, we segmented the business needs of nearly 200,000 
advisors in the U.S. retail market, including both those we 
now serve and those whom we’ve identified as having 
significant business potential. Further, we are applying the 
lessons we’ve learned in the meaningful success of our 
innovative “cross channel” sales model, launched in 2011. 
Given that success, our conviction is high that multiple 
coverage models can succeed and lift the productivity of all 
sales teams to create a more powerful distribution system.

We’ve introduced a new solutions-oriented, capital markets-
based selling approach and a modified sales compensation 
plan to support it. Going forward, we will use metrics to 
reinforce collaboration throughout the organization and 
strengthen accountability for results.

We’re very excited about the opportunity to accelerate our 
success in our global distribution platform with the launch in 
April of these new sales initiatives in the United States, and 
we will apply a similar, though regionally adapted, approach 
internationally in the year ahead.

Strengthening Our Independent Multi-Affiliate Model—
While firmly committed to our independent, multi-Affiliate 
model, we recognize that there is room for meaningful 
improvement in how we execute this model. The economic 
structure, the relationship governance and mix of our 
Affiliate portfolio must be modified and enhanced. 

With that in mind, we successfully completed two 
Management Equity Plans with Permal and ClearBridge 
during the year to create greater alignment in building long-
term franchise value at the Affiliate level. 

These plans are designed to improve the Affiliate’s ability to 
recruit and retain talent, support succession planning and 
yield incremental margin for Legg Mason shareholders, as 
the Affiliate grows. We expect to complete similar plans 
with each of our major Affiliates.

At the same time, we substantially modified the mix of our 
Affiliate portfolio by rationalizing non-strategic, sub-scale 
and underperforming managers and adding new investment 
capabilities, through a series of difficult but important actions.

To address small or non-core Affiliates in a thoughtful 
manner, we reached an agreement to sell Private Capital 
Management back to its management team in August and 
made the decision to wind down operations at our London-
based emerging market Affiliate, Esemplia, last fall.

Additionally, we combined Legg Mason Capital Management 
with ClearBridge Investments, rebranding LMCM products 
under the ClearBridge name. We will now leverage their 
shared history and success, focused on fundamental 
investing, under a single brand. 

In March, we were very pleased to announce the acquisition 
of QS Investors, which was completed in May, bringing to 
Legg Mason a leading manager of customized solutions and 
global quantitative equities. We are very fortunate to add 

3Legg MasonExecutive 
Committee
Legg Mason’s Executive  
Committee is composed of  
(left to right) Tom Merchant,  
General Counsel; Tom 
Hoops, Head of Business 
Development; Joe Sullivan,  
Chief Executive Officer;  
Jennifer Murphy, Chief  
Administrative Officer; Pete 
Nachtwey, Chief Financial  
Officer; and Terry Johnson,  
Head of Global Distribution.  

this highly talented team with a distinctive and differentiated 
investment process and a scalable, proprietary investment 
platform capable of accommodating significant growth. 

our Affiliate lineup, but only if and as we find a quality firm 
with a leverageable investment platform, again, with a focus 
on having fewer and larger Affiliates.

In tandem with the acquisition of QS, we have begun the 
process of combining, over time, the investment capabilities 
and operations of QS with those of Batterymarch Financial, 
our existing quantitative equity manager, and Legg Mason 
Global Asset Allocation, our multi-manager platform. We’re 
confident that the combined platform, bringing together 
the best of these three firms, will powerfully position Legg 
Mason to meet the rapidly growing client demand for global 
solutions, liquid alternatives and smart beta categories. 

Each of these actions involved difficult but necessary 
decisions that have helped streamline our Affiliate lineup 
and clarify our brand in the marketplace. As a result, we 
now have six larger, highly focused Affiliates in Brandywine 
Global, ClearBridge Investments, Permal, QS Investors, 
Royce & Associates and Western Asset Management, each 
with a distinct investment expertise and brand. 

And, as it relates to expanding and refining our investment 
capabilities and Affiliate mix, we’re not done.

We do expect to continue adding investment capability 
through lift-outs and bolt-ins and will likely add modestly to 

As we expand our investment capability, we seek to add 
investment professionals and new Affiliate relationships with 
people and firms that are entrepreneurial and innovative, that 
deliver compelling investment results for investors, whose 
culture is consistent with our clients first commitment and 
who seek the benefits of a true partnership with a large, 
global firm. 

While these attributes represent a high bar for admission, 
we believe that Legg Mason is a wonderful home for 
great investors. Our current Affiliates share these critical 
characteristics and are aligned with us in strong partnership 
to serve our clients, a mutual commitment that will drive our 
collective success.  

We’re proud of the significant and successful work on these 
three critical imperatives this past year and are confident that 
we are now better positioned in the marketplace, realizing 
that the heavy lifting of growth has just begun.

Year in Review: Business and Financials
We are certainly pleased with the performance of our stock 
over the past year, which we believe reflects significant 

4

Legg Mason

progress on the three fundamental imperatives and 
improvement on key business metrics. 

Most importantly, investment performance remained strong 
overall, with three-quarters or more of our strategy AUM 
exceeding benchmarks for all time periods as of year-end. 

Our results include an improvement of $28 billion in long-
term net flows. This improvement, led by fixed income 
inflows and significantly reduced equity outflows, resulted  
in a modest total outflow for the fiscal year. 

outcome-oriented products that our clients want, both 
through QS’s own expertise and through partnerships with 
our other investment Affiliates. 

We intend to complete more Management Equity Plans 
in the coming year, as doing so aligns the Company more 
deeply with our Affiliates, provides a mechanism for long-
term growth and sustainability and, very importantly, affords 
Legg Mason the opportunity to achieve incremental margin 
as each Affiliate grows. 

We achieved a 5% increase in revenues and a meaningful 
improvement in our operating margin, as adjusted, year  
over year. 

We fully expect continued improvement in distribution in 
both the institutional and retail channels and are investing 
thoughtfully and meaningfully to support that growth. 

For Fiscal Year 2014, Legg Mason reported net income  
of $285 million, or $2.33 per diluted share, and adjusted 
income of $418 million, or $3.41 per diluted share. 

And finally, as we run our business, we will continue to 
pursue managing this Company with the highest degree of 
efficiency and effectiveness possible…Kaizen! 

Assets under management at fiscal year-end were  
$702 billion, up 6% from March 2013. 

We refinanced our debt, deleveraged our balance sheet and 
locked in long-term debt capital at current historically low rates.

While we seek to deliver on these operating goals, we’ll 
continue to appropriately balance the allocation of our capital 
between investing in the business for the long term and 
returning it to shareholders. 

Finally, over the past year we returned capital to 
shareholders by repurchasing 9.7 million shares and 
increasing our dividend by 23%. 

We are very pleased that over the past three years the 
combination of our share buyback and dividend has 
resulted in Legg Mason delivering one of the highest total 
shareholder payout rates in the industry.  

The Year Ahead
As an asset management firm, we generate a significant 
amount of cash that we can return to shareholders and 
invest strategically in future growth, which is the foundation 
of Building a Better Legg Mason.

In the year ahead, we remain committed to continuing to  
fill investment capability gaps, most importantly in non- 
U.S. equities, a goal that remains very high on my personal 
list of priorities. 

We will also continue to look thoughtfully and opportunis-
tically at adding alternative investment capabilities in such 
asset classes as real estate, energy and private equity. 

I am extremely proud of the dedication and commitment  
of our nearly 3,000 professionals around the world, as  
they continue to work tirelessly to serve both our clients  
and shareholders. 

We recognize the many challenges faced by investors 
today, challenges that may, at times, seem almost 
overwhelming. We have the resources, the capability and 
the opportunity to play a meaningful role with investors to 
solve many of these challenges. This opportunity is also a 
responsibility to lead, to bring more to the clients we now 
serve and to reach more investors around the world. In 
fulfilling this responsibility, we will return our Legg Mason 
to organic growth, to the benefit of the clients we serve, 
our shareholders and our fellow colleagues. We eagerly 
and gratefully accept this important responsibility.

We appreciate your continued trust and confidence. 

We are excited about the potential for the solutions 
capability we now have with QS Investors to deliver the 

Joseph A. Sullivan 
President and Chief Executive Officer

Legg Mason

5

Global value investing 

Pursuing value since 1986 across equity and 
fixed-income, globally and in the United 
States. Historically institutionally focused, 
the firm has both a boutique’s agility and a 
leader’s stability and resources.

Assets by Strategy

  Fixed Income—79%
  Diversified Equity—9%
  Large Cap Equity—9%
  Small/Mid Cap Equity—3%

Quality focused equity

Global investment manager with over 45 
years of experience and long-tenured portfolio 
managers who seek to build income, high 
active share or low volatility portfolios.

Assets by Product Type

  High Active Share*—51%
  Income Solutions—26%
  Low Volatility—23%

*Active share is a measure of the percentage of stock holdings in a manager’s portfolio that differs from the benchmark index.

Global alternative asset manager

Permal Group is a leading global alternative 
asset manager offering investment 
solutions through established funds and 
customized portfolios.

6

Legg Mason

Multi-Manager Funds’  
Assets by Strategy

  Global Macro—30%
  Fixed Income—21%
  Global Long/Short—21%
  Event Driven—19%
  Thematic—3%
  Equity Long—2%
  Natural Resources—1%
  Cash/Other—3%

Brandywine Global’s momentum in Fiscal 2014 came from a focus on culture, investment research and 
reinvestment in the business. Its strong culture led Pensions & Investments to recognize Brandywine as one of  
the “Best Places to Work.” Brandywine added 50 talented professionals to its team and thoughtfully executed  
its research agenda, such that 97% of the firm’s clients outperformed their indexes since inception. 

The firm also expanded its global reach, opening offices in Montreal and Toronto. As of March 31, 2014, over 43% 
of the firm’s assets come from 20 countries outside of the United States, while over 68% of assets are managed in 
global mandates. The firm also substantially grew its sub-advisory business, and now manages $17 billion in 
mutual fund and UCITS assets, an increase of 15% over fiscal year-end 2013. 

All of this led to the ultimate form of sustainable momentum: client satisfaction. The firm’s assets rose to $52 billion, 
its highest ever.

ClearBridge Investments is an active global equity manager with more than $90 billion in assets under management. 
During the year, ClearBridge’s long-tenured portfolio managers and fundamental research team continued to focus 
on building portfolios for clients around income solutions, high active share and managed volatility. 

An improved equity environment, ClearBridge’s consistent investment discipline and an ongoing commitment to 
reinvesting in its business drove its success throughout the year. Long-term competitive investment results across 
client portfolios resulted in new flows of more than $9 billion across portfolio strategies. ClearBridge also expanded 
its business globally, particularly in Asia and Europe, in conjunction with Legg Mason Global Distribution. 

ClearBridge operates with investment independence from its headquarters in New York and offices in Baltimore, 
San Francisco and Wilmington. ClearBridge portfolio managers are among the most seasoned in the industry, 
having an average of 25 years of investment experience and 19 years at the firm.

The past year has been marked by highly significant developments. Permal acquired Fauchier Partners, a leading 
European-based, institutionally focused alternative manager, and successfully merged it into the Group. Permal 
further enhanced its position as an industry innovator, launching various new products across the liquidity 
spectrum, including a two-year lock-up fund focused on opportunistic investing, as well as a daily liquid fund—
Permal Alternative Select Fund—its first open-end alternative mutual fund. The growth of corporate activism has 
been a core theme that has played throughout the year, both across Permal’s portfolios and in a dedicated fund. 
Elsewhere, there was further development on the buyside managed account platform (PMAP), which grew to  
$8.2 billion, increasing 24% over the past year, and there are now 86 accounts, divided into pari passu and 
customized exposures. Permal also has built out its customized mandate business, which now accounts for 
approximately $4 billion of Permal’s assets, and is core to the future as investors look to alternative investment 
solutions to fulfill specific portfolio requirements.

Legg Mason

7

Total AUM by Product

  Global Equities—37% 
  Customized Solutions—36%
  U.S. Equities—27%

Customized solutions and  
global quantitative equities

Innovative solutions within a quantitative 
framework. The firm takes a consultative 
approach to global asset management, and 
applies complementary behavioral and 
fundamental market insights to manage 
portfolios with a repeatable, risk-aware process.

Small-cap equity

Known for its disciplined, value-oriented 
approach to managing small caps. An asset 
class pioneer, the firm’s founder is one of 
the longest-tenured active managers.

Total Invested Assets  
by Geography

  U.S. Equity—83%
  Rest of the World Equity—9%
  European Equity—3%
  Cash—5%

Fixed income

One of the world’s leading global fixed-
income managers. Founded in 1971,  
the firm is known for team management, 
proprietary research and a long-term 
fundamental value approach.

8

Legg Mason

Total AUM by Mandate

  Specialized—44% 
 (Corporate, Emerging Markets,  
Long Duration, Global Portfolio,  
Inflation-Linked)
  Broad Portfolio—21%
  Taxable Liquidity—32%
  Municipals—3%

 
 
Legg Mason acquired QS Investors, a research-driven solutions asset manager, in a transaction that closed  
on May 30th of 2014. Through QS, we have acquired a globally recognized manager with a distinctive and 
differentiated investment process, noted solutions capabilities and a proprietary investment platform capable  
of accommodating significant scale. 

There are unique, complementary synergies among QS Investors, Batterymarch and LMGAA, and as previously 
announced, Batterymarch and LMGAA will be combined over time with QS Investors to create a world-class 
platform with unique solutions, quantitative equity and multi-manager asset allocation capabilities. The combined 
platform will be branded under the QS Investors name and headed by QS Investors’ CEO Janet Campagna. 

Building a scalable, global solutions platform that can both compete for and win large-scale institutional custom 
solutions mandates, and bringing these solutions to the retail marketplace, has been one of our top priorities, and 
we are very pleased to have taken this strong step forward.

For more than 40 years, Royce & Associates has utilized a disciplined, value-oriented approach in managing  
small-cap and other equity portfolios. Known through The Royce Funds, its family of open-end mutual funds, 
Royce is committed to the same investment principles that have served it well since 1972.

2013 was an exciting year for The Royce Funds. In April, Royce relaunched roycefunds.com to build a simpler, better 
organized site that’s more vibrant and user-friendly, one that showcases our best asset—our experienced and 
talented investment staff. The site uses a responsive design to ensure a consistent experience for someone who may 
start viewing the website in the office on a desktop and continue on a tablet or mobile device on their way home.

The website was recognized by strategic consulting firm Kasina as one of the “10 best advisor websites,” based 
on availability of content, quality of content and user experience. We were very pleased that the site also received 
four Mutual Fund Education Alliance awards, including the Overall/Digital/Technology award. 

In December, Chris Clark and Francis Gannon were named Co-Chief Investment Officers, a change that became 
official on January 1, 2014. In their new roles they will provide supervision of Royce’s portfolio management 
practice. This will encompass appropriate risk management oversight, as well as ensuring portfolio 
accountability and compliance. 

While Western Asset’s investment process remained unchanged in the year, we continued to reinvest in our 
franchise and build out our investment resources. Our success has always been grounded in a steady focus on  
our investment philosophy and process, and a commitment to hiring exceptional talent—our CIO, Ken Leech, 
co-served with Steve Walsh last year in preparation for Steve’s retirement. Ken officially took over on March 31. 

In the fiscal year and continuing into this year, we have increased our focus on higher-yielding investment 
solutions in this low interest rate environment, and to unconstrained investing. These areas, specifically, 
present very attractive global investment opportunities for our clients in an otherwise uncertain environment.

Western Asset earned several honors last year, including awards for Core and Core Plus from Institutional Investor, 
for the Western Asset High Income Fund and the Global Corporate Bond Fund from Lipper, and for the Legg Mason 
Western Asset U.S. High Yield Fund from Benchmark Magazine. 

Legg Mason

9

GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION  

LEGG MASON’S GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION BUSINESS TODAY

$252B in AUM globally

Over 200 client-facing team members  
around the world 

Gross FY 2014 sales of $65 billion, up  
15% from FY 2013

Over 16 distribution offices in six regions 

Serving more than 100,000 intermediary  
clients globally

Four core themes, all around understanding and meeting 
client needs, guide the management of Legg Mason’s 
distribution platform:

1.  Client solutions orientation: Drives how we think 

about product development, how we cover the 
intermediary channel and how we help intermediaries 
serve investors.

2.  Data-based decisions: Analysis of client, market 

and demographic data informs our approach to client 
segmentation and underpins our coverage model for 
serving distribution partners and clients.

3.  Broad global footprint: Investment and client service 

teams around the world allow us to leverage and syndicate 
the best ideas and practices, regardless of their origin. 

4.  Active partnership with Affiliate managers: We 

collaborate with our asset managers throughout the sales 
process with transparency and accountability and utilize 
their expertise to most effectively serve our clients.

Global Distribution Sales leadership

10Legg MasonU.S. Distribution Sales team meeting

INVESTING IN INNOVATION FOR THE FUTURE

Industry research suggests that a new breed of asset 
manager will emerge by 2020, with highly streamlined 
platforms, targeted solutions and stronger brands. 
Connecting with clients in a variety of ways to solve their 
investment needs will be a continually evolving process. 

At Legg Mason, we believe the smart players will find  
new, innovative ways to harness customer and related  
data available to better anticipate and serve our clients. 
We will continue to evolve the traditional model to achieve 
greater efficiency and effectiveness in distribution.

We want to deepen and expand client coverage and 
improve the customer experience and salesforce 
effectiveness through technology, marketing and training.

In the fiscal year, Legg Mason introduced a new solutions-
oriented, capital markets-based selling approach and a 
modified sales compensation plan to reinforce it.

We’ve segmented the business needs of advisors that we 
believe represent our opportunity set, including those we 
work with today as well as those whom we have identified 
as having great potential for us. 

We drew inspiration from the meaningful success we’ve had 
with our innovative cross channel team, which we launched 
in 2011. As a result, our conviction is high that multiple 
coverage models can lift the productivity of all sales teams 
and create a more powerful distribution system. 

Starting in fiscal year 2015, we are meaningfully expanding 
client-facing teams, with a particular focus on channels in 

which we have both established a strong track record and 
see meaningful growth opportunities. These investments 
are being amplified.

Global  
Investment  
Survey

Legg Mason’s survey is an 
annual vehicle in which 
we connect with investors 
in all of the regions in 
which we operate. Our 2014 
survey interviews over 
4,000 affluent investors from more than 20 countries to find 
out their views on current asset allocations versus their goals, 
and their perceptions of opportunities across asset classes  
and geographies. 

The findings from the survey provide valuable perspectives as 
we think about product development in the context of solving 
the investment challenges investors face. We use the data we 
collect to educate our sales teams and our distribution partners, 
and to build our brand with investors around the globe.

11Legg MasonCORPORATE CITIZENSHIP  
INVESTING IN  
OUR COMMUNITIES 

The primary focus of the Legg Mason Charitable Foundation 
is on education, especially as it relates to at-risk children in 
the areas in which Legg Mason employees live and work. 

We believe that our foundation contributions will yield the 
most results when we partner with grassroots organizations 
with strong local presences. More importantly, we take an 
integrated approach: applying both our financial resources 
and our employee time and effort with our Tier One 
Partners in the community. 

Our partners directly meet one of our stated objectives; 
they are at a size in which Legg Mason’s commitment really 
makes a difference; and they generally have Board support 
from one or more Legg Mason employees. 

Our objectives focus on the following needs: 
• Strong and innovative principals
•  Well-trained teachers with appropriate resources
•  Funding high-quality early education and after- 

school programs

•  Scholarship funding for at-risk children 

We rolled out this focused investment in community 
partners last year in Baltimore at Saint Ignatius Loyola. 
We are in the process of implementing similar partnerships 
at local organizations in metro areas in which we have a 
strong employee presence.

Saint Ignatius Loyola Academy is a tuition-free, 
independent Jesuit school for underserved boys in 
grades six through eight. The Academy has a 20-year 
history of providing quality education to at-risk children, 
of diverse races, ethnicities and religions, who live in 
Baltimore. Enrollment in the Academy is determined by a 
variety of factors, including financial need, a demonstrated 
desire to succeed and residence in Baltimore City.

Legg Mason’s financial contribution supports scholarships 
for students and new building renovations at the school’s 
campus. Our employees volunteer at the school with the 
students and provide skill-based volunteering to support 
the school’s infrastructure. Legg Mason professionals are 
currently helping to relaunch the school’s website. And, 
there are fundraising opportunities throughout the year to 
engage employee interest.

Measuring Successful Partners

98% of Saint Ignatius Loyola Academy graduates receive a high school diploma.

88% of Academy graduates matriculate at post-secondary educational institutions.

12Legg MasonSUSTAINABILITY STANDARDS  
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL  
AND GOVERNANCE FACTORS 

Institutional investors and consultants increasingly 
understand the relevance of environmental, social and 
governance (ESG) factors to well-run companies and to  
the long-term health and stability of the markets. 

At Legg Mason, our investment managers have long 
considered that sustainability is part of the long-term health 
of businesses and the markets in which they function.

Approximately 13% of our total long-term AUM is in 
ESG/socially responsible investing strategies, and as 
consultants, pensions, foundations and endowments 
increasingly look at these factors when making investment 
decisions, we expect this area to grow. 

In fact, our largest equity Affiliate, ClearBridge 
Investments, believes that the integration of ESG factors 
into its fundamental research and stock selection process 
is a compelling offering. Governance issues are another 
important component of its engagement and advocacy 
work, as an integral part of its long-term view of stock 
ownership. ClearBridge has offered active ESG strategies  
for clients since 1987. 

As long-term investors, responsible stewardship of our 
investments is an important consideration. We firmly 
believe that the companies that are thoughtful about these 
issues are often well-run companies. 

And, at Legg Mason, we seek to run our business in  
the same way. Over the past several years, we have 
sought to both increase our efficiency in operations and 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We have done this 
through consolidating in energy-efficient buildings, 
investing in teleconferencing technology, outsourcing 
data centers and utilizing cloud technology. The space 
in Legg Mason’s headquarters has obtained LEED gold 
certification. Collectively, these actions allow us both to  
run our business more efficiently and to have a positive 
long-term impact on the environment. 

Legg Mason benchmarks its efforts against standards 
set by leading ESG organizations. 

In partnership with sustainability advocate Ceres, we 
engage with our stakeholders on an ongoing basis regarding 
our sustainability efforts and reporting to take advantage 
of diverse perspectives on our progress. The Carbon 

Disclosure Project named 
Legg Mason to the 
2013 Climate Disclosure 
Leadership Index (CDLI) 
in recognition of the firm’s 
energy use reporting. 
We believe that reflecting corporate environmental factors 
in business planning has a positive impact on mitigating 
climate-related risks and strengthens our business. 

Legg Mason’s Sustainability Council, led by Investor 
Relations, is focused on education and awareness, 
operations and efficiency, and carbon reporting and  
data collection.

In 2013, Legg Mason and its investment Affiliates, in 
partnership with Mercer Consulting, hosted a “Responsible 
Investing Teach-In” that included investment professionals 
and shared services employees from multiple corporate 
and Affiliate campuses.

2013 Corporate  
& Social  
Responsibility  
Report

We published our most  
recent Corporate & Social  
Responsibility Report earlier  
this year, which covered calendar year 2013.

The report provides an update to our many stakeholders 
on the programs and activities we offer in all areas of 
sustainability: the environment, diversity, volunteerism, 
community and philanthropy, with a focus on environmental 
issues and initiatives.

Among key achievements noted in the report was our 
inclusion in the prestigious 2013 Climate Disclosure 
Leadership Index, which required a score within the top  
10% of S&P 500 companies that submitted a CDP response. 
Legg Mason ranked ninth out of 55 financial services 
companies that responded.

13Legg MasonBOARD OF DIRECTORS

Standing left to right

Seated left to right 

John E. Koerner III
Managing Member, Koerner Capital, LLC

W. Allen Reed
Private Investor; Retired CEO,
GM Asset Management Corporation
(Chairman of the Finance Committee)

Kurt L. Schmoke
President-elect of the  
University of Baltimore; 
Former Mayor of Baltimore

Dennis M. Kass
Private Investor; Retired CEO,
Jennison Associates 
(Chairman of the Board)

Joseph A. Sullivan
President and CEO, Legg Mason, Inc.

John H. Myers
Senior Advisor, Angelo, Gordon & Co.; 
Retired President and CEO,  
GE Asset Management (GEAM)

Cheryl Gordon Krongard
Private Investor; Former CEO,
Rothschild Asset Management 
(Chairman of the  
Compensation Committee)

John V. Murphy 
Retired Chairman and CEO, 
OppenheimerFunds

Barry W. Huff
Retired Vice Chairman, Deloitte
(Chairman of the Audit Committee)

Nelson Peltz
CEO and Founding Partner,
Trian Fund Management, L.P.
(Chairman of the Nominating & 
Corporate Governance Committee)

John T. Cahill
Executive Chairman,  
Kraft Foods Group, Inc.

Margaret Milner Richardson
Private Consultant and Investor;
Former U.S. Commissioner  
of Internal Revenue

Harold L. Adams
Chairman Emeritus,  
RTKL Associates, Inc.

Robert E. Angelica
Private Investor; Former Chairman  
and CEO, AT&T Investment  
Management Corporation
(Chairman of the Risk Committee)

Not pictured

Carol Anthony (“John”) Davidson 
Retired Senior Vice President,  
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer,  
Tyco International

Our New Director

Carol Anthony (“John”) Davidson 
is retired senior vice president, 
controller and chief accounting 
officer of Tyco International, where 
he was responsible for overseeing 
financial reporting, internal controls 
and accounting policy across Tyco’s 
global operations. 

Prior to joining Tyco in January 
2004, Mr. Davidson served as vice 
president, audit, risk and compliance 
for Dell Inc. During his six-year career 
at Dell, he served in other senior 
capacities, including chief compliance 
officer, vice president and corporate 
controller, and vice president of 
internal audit. 

Mr. Davidson is a member of 
the board of directors of DaVita 
HealthCare Partners Inc. and 
Pentair Ltd. His other affiliations 
include membership on the board of 
trustees of the Financial Accounting 
Foundation and the board of 
governors of the Financial Industry 
Regulatory Authority.

14Legg MasonSelected Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)

OPERATING RESULTS

Operating Revenues

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Years Ended March 31,

$2,741,757

$2,612,650

$2,662,574

$2,784,317

$2,634,879

Operating expenses, excluding impairment

2,310,864

2,313,149

2,323,821

2,397,509

2,313,696

Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill

Operating Income (Loss)

Other non-operating expense, net

Other non-operating income (loss) of consolidated 

investment vehicles, net

Fund support

Income (Loss) before Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net Income (Loss)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to  

noncontrolling interests

—

430,893

(13,726)

2,474

—

419,641

137,805

281,836

734,000

(434,499)

(73,287)

—

338,753

(54,006)

—

386,808

(23,315)

—

321,183

(32,027)

(2,821)

18,336

1,704

17,329

—

(510,607)

(150,859)

(359,748)

—

303,083

72,052

231,031

—

365,197

119,434

245,763

23,171

329,656

118,676

210,980

(2,948)

(6,421)

10,214

(8,160)

6,623

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

$   284,784

$  (353,327)

$   220,817

$   253,923

$   204,357

PER SHARE

Net Income (Loss) per Share Attributable to

Legg Mason, Inc. Common Shareholders:

Basic

Diluted

Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:

Basic
Diluted(1)

Dividends Declared

BALANCE SHEET

Total Assets

Long-term debt

Total Stockholders’ Equity

FINANCIAL RATIOS AND OTHER DATA
Adjusted Income(2)
Adjusted Income per diluted share(2)
Operating Margin
Operating Margin, as Adjusted(3)
Total debt to total capital(4)
Assets under management (in millions)
Full-time employees

$         2.34

$         (2.65)

$          1.54

$          1.63

$          1.33

$         2.33

$         (2.65)

$          1.54

$          1.63

$          1.32

121,941

122,383

133,226

133,226

143,292

143,349

155,321

155,484

153,715

155,362

$         0.52

$         0.44

$         0.32

$         0.20

$          0.12

$7,111,349

$ 7,269,660

$8,555,747

$ 8,707,756

$8,622,632

1,039,264

4,724,724

1,144,954

4,818,351

1,136,892

5,677,291

1,201,868

5,770,384

1,170,334

5,841,724

$    417,805

$    347,169

$    397,030

$   439,248

$   381,258

$         3.41

$          2.61

$          2.77

$          2.83

$          2.45

15.7%

22.0%

18.0%

(16.6)%

17.5%

19.2%

12.7%

22.3%

19.6%

13.9%

24.3%

20.1%

12.2%

21.9%

19.6%

$   701,774

$   664,609

$   643,318

$    677,646

$   684,549

2,843

2,975

2,979

3,395

3,550

(1)  Basic shares and diluted shares are the same for periods with a net loss.
(2)  Adjusted Income is a non-GAAP performance measure. We define Adjusted Income as Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., plus amortiza-
tion and deferred taxes related to intangible assets and goodwill, and imputed interest and tax benefits on contingent convertible debt less deferred income 
taxes on goodwill and indefinite-life intangible asset impairment, if any. We also adjust for certain non-core items, such as intangible asset impairments, 
the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, the impact of tax rate adjustments on certain deferred tax liabilities related 
to indefinite-life intangible assets, and loss on extinguishment of contingent convertible debt. See Supplemental Non-GAAP Information in Management’s 
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(3)  Operating Margin, as Adjusted, is a non-GAAP performance measure we calculate by dividing (i) Operating Income (Loss), adjusted to exclude the impact 
on compensation expense of gains or losses on investments made to fund deferred compensation plans, the impact on compensation expense of gains or 
losses on seed capital investments by our affiliates under revenue sharing agreements, amortization related to intangible assets, transition-related costs of 
streamlining our business model, if any, income (loss) of consolidated investment vehicles, the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration 
liabilities, if any, and impairment charges by (ii) our Operating Revenues, adjusted to add back net investment advisory fees eliminated upon consolidation of 
investment vehicles, less distribution and servicing expenses which we use as an approximate measure of revenues that are passed through to third parties, 
which we refer to as “Operating Revenues, as Adjusted.” See Supplemental Non-GAAP Information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial 
Condition and Results of Operations.

(4)  Calculated based on total debt as a percentage of total capital (total stockholders’ equity plus total debt) as of March 31.

15

Legg MasonManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  
and Results of Operations

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Legg Mason, Inc., a holding company, with its subsidiaries 
(which collectively comprise “Legg Mason”) is a global 
asset management firm. Acting through our subsidiaries, 
we provide investment management and related services 
to institutional and individual clients, company-sponsored 
mutual funds and other investment vehicles. We offer 
these products and services directly and through various 
financial intermediaries. We have operations principally 
in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and the United 
Kingdom (“U.K.”) and also have offices in Australia, 
Bahamas, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Dubai, France, 
Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Poland, Singapore, 
Spain, Switzerland and Taiwan. All references to fiscal 
2014, 2013 or 2012, refer to our fiscal year ended March 
31 of that year. Terms such as “we,” “us,” “our,” and 
“Company” refer to Legg Mason.

Our operating revenues primarily consist of investment 
advisory fees from separate accounts and funds, and 
distribution and service fees. Investment advisory fees 
are generally calculated as a percentage of the assets of 
the investment portfolios that we manage. In addition, 
performance fees may be earned under certain investment 
advisory contracts for exceeding performance benchmarks. 
The largest portion of our performance fees is earned 
based on 12-month performance periods that end in 
differing quarters during the year, with a portion based on 
quarterly performance periods. Distribution and service 
fees are received for distributing investment products 
and services, or for providing other support services to 
investment portfolios, and are generally calculated as a 
percentage of the assets in an investment portfolio or 
as a percentage of new assets added to an investment 
portfolio. Our revenues, therefore, are dependent upon the 
level of our assets under management (“AUM”) and fee 
rates, and thus are affected by factors such as securities 
market conditions, our ability to attract and maintain 
AUM and key investment personnel, and investment 
performance. Our AUM primarily vary from period to 
period due to inflows and outflows of client assets as 
well as market performance. Client decisions to increase 
or decrease their assets under our management, and 
decisions by potential clients to utilize our services, may 
be based on one or more of a number of factors. These 
factors include our reputation in the marketplace, the 
investment performance (both absolute and relative to 
benchmarks or competitive products) of our products 
and services, the fees we charge for our investment 
services, the client or potential client’s situation, including 
investment objectives, liquidity needs, investment horizon 
and amount of assets managed, our relationships with 
distributors and the external economic environment, 
including market conditions.

The fees that we charge for our investment services 
vary based upon factors such as the type of underlying 
investment product, the amount of AUM, the asset 
management affiliate that provides the services, and 
the type of services (and investment objectives) that are 
provided. Fees charged for equity asset management 
services are generally higher than fees charged for 
fixed income and liquidity asset management services. 
Accordingly, our revenues and average advisory revenue 
yields will be affected by the composition of our AUM, 
with changes in the relative level of equity assets more 
significantly impacting our revenues and average advisory 
revenue yields. Average advisory revenue yields are 
calculated as the ratio of annualized investment advisory 
fees, excluding performance fees, to average AUM. 
In addition, in the ordinary course of our business, we 
may reduce or waive investment management fees, or 
limit total expenses, on certain products or services for 
particular time periods to manage fund expenses, or for 
other reasons, and to help retain or increase managed 
assets. We have revenue sharing agreements in place 
with most of our asset management affiliates, under 
which specified percentages of the affiliates’ revenues 
are required to be distributed to us and the balance of the 
revenues is retained to pay operating expenses, including 
compensation expenses, but excluding certain expenses 
and income taxes. Under these agreements, our asset 
management affiliates retain different percentages of 
revenues to cover their costs. As such, our Net Income 
(Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., operating margin 
and compensation as a percentage of operating revenues 
are impacted based on which affiliates generate our 
revenues, and a change in AUM at one affiliate can have a 
dramatically different effect on our revenues and earnings 
than an equal change at another affiliate. In addition, 
from time to time, we may agree to changes in revenue 
sharing agreements and other arrangements with our 
asset management personnel, which may impact our 
compensation expenses and profitability.

The most significant component of our cost structure 
is employee compensation and benefits, of which a 
majority is variable in nature and includes incentive 
compensation that is primarily based upon revenue levels, 
non-compensation related operating expense levels at 
revenue share-based affiliates, and our overall profitability. 
The next largest component of our cost structure is 
distribution and servicing expense, which consists 
primarily of fees paid to third-party distributors for selling 
our asset management products and services and are 
largely variable in nature. Certain other operating costs are 
quasi-fixed in nature, such as occupancy, depreciation and 
amortization, and fixed contract commitments for market 
data, communication and technology services, and usually 

16

Legg Masondo not decline with reduced levels of business activity 
or, conversely, usually do not rise proportionately with 
increased business activity.

retaining clients. In the last few years, the industry has 
seen flows into products for which we do not currently 
garner significant market share.

Our financial position and results of operations are 
materially affected by the overall trends and conditions 
of the financial markets, particularly in the U.S., but 
increasingly in the other countries in which we operate. 
Results of any individual period should not be considered 
representative of future results. Our profitability is 
sensitive to a variety of factors, including the amount and 
composition of our AUM, and the volatility and general 
level of securities prices and interest rates, among other 
things. Periods of unfavorable market conditions are likely 
to have an adverse effect on our profitability. In addition, 
the diversification of services and products offered, 
investment performance, access to distribution channels, 
reputation in the market, attracting and retaining key 
employees and client relations are significant factors in 
determining whether we are successful in attracting and 

The financial services business in which we are engaged 
is extremely competitive. Our competition includes 
numerous global, national, regional and local asset 
management firms, broker-dealers, commercial banks and 
other financial services companies. The industry has been 
impacted by continued economic uncertainty, the constant 
introduction of new products and services, and the 
consolidation of financial services firms through mergers 
and acquisitions. The industry in which we operate is also 
subject to extensive regulation under federal, state, and 
foreign laws. Like most firms, we have been impacted by 
regulatory and legislative changes. Responding to these 
changes and keeping abreast of regulatory developments, 
has required, and will continue to require, us to incur costs 
that continue to impact our profitability.

Our strategic priorities are focused on four primary areas listed below. Management keeps these strategic priorities in 
mind when it evaluates our operating performance and financial condition. Consistent with this approach, we have also 
presented in the table below the most important initiatives on which management currently focuses in evaluating our 
performance and financial condition.

Strategic Priorities

Initiatives

Products

•  Create an innovative portfolio of investment products and promote revenue growth through new product 

development and leveraging the capabilities of our affiliates

•  Identify and execute strategic acquisitions to increase product offerings and fill gaps in products  

and services

Performance

•  Deliver compelling and consistent performance against both relevant benchmarks and the products and 

Distribution

Productivity

services of our competitors

•  Evaluate and reallocate resources within and to our distribution platform to continue to maintain and 
enhance our top tier distribution function with the capability to offer solutions to relevant investment 
challenges and grow market share worldwide

•  Operate with a high level of effectiveness and improve ongoing efficiency
•  Manage expenses
•  Align affiliate economic relationships

The strategic priorities discussed above are designed to 
drive improvements in our operating margin, net flows, 
earnings, cash flows, assets under management and other 
key metrics. Certain of these key metrics are discussed in 
our annual results discussion to follow. In connection with 
these strategic priorities, during the year ended March 31, 
2014, we incurred $29.4 million in expenses related to 
various corporate initiatives, including the closing down or 
reorganizing of certain businesses and ongoing efforts to 
increase efficiency and effectiveness. Beginning in fiscal 
2015, we plan to invest in our centralized global 
distribution business, which will include the reinvestment 
of savings from these various corporate initiatives.

In March 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire 
QS Investors Holdings, LLC (“QS Investors”), a leading 
customized solutions and global quantitative equities 
provider with approximately $5 billion in AUM and nearly 
$100 billion in assets under advisement (“AUA”) as of 
March 31, 2014. This acquisition is expected to close in 
the first quarter of fiscal 2015. In connection with the 
completion of this acquisition, beginning in the first quarter 
of fiscal 2015, we will begin reporting AUA. Two of our 
existing affiliates, Batterymarch Financial Management, 
Inc. (“Batterymarch”) and Legg Mason Global Asset 
Allocation, LLC (“LMGAA”), will be integrated over time 
into QS Investors to leverage the best aspects of each 

17

Legg Masonsubsidiary. In connection with the integration, we expect 
to incur restructuring and transition costs of approximately 
$35 million, approximately $2.5 million of which was 
incurred in the year ended March 31, 2014. Approximately 
$30 million of the anticipated remaining costs associated 
with the integration are expected to be incurred in the year 
ending March 31, 2015.

Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. for fiscal 
2014 was $284.8 million, or $2.33 per diluted share, as 
compared to Net Loss Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. of 
$353.3 million, or $2.65 per diluted share, for fiscal 2013. 
The prior year loss was primarily attributable to $734.0 
million, or $3.81 per diluted share, of non-cash impairment 
charges related to intangible assets and a $69.0 million, 
or $0.34 per diluted share, non-operating charge from 
the extinguishment of debt. Average AUM, and total 
revenues, increased in fiscal 2014, as compared to fiscal 
2013. Strong overall investment performance and the 
improvement of our global distribution function contributed 
to a continued reduction in long-term asset outflows. 
Increases in AUM due to market performance and new 
product launches in fiscal 2014, offset modest outflows in 
long-term assets.

The following discussion and analysis provides additional 
information regarding our financial condition and results  
of operations.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND  
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The business environment in fiscal 2014 was marked by a 
slow, steady growth in the U.S. economy. The economy 
experienced steady growth despite a broad range of 
mixed economic news including improvements in the 
housing sector and consumer confidence and uncertainty 
regarding the Federal Reserve’s bond buying program. All 
three major U.S. equity market indices increased during 
fiscal 2014 while two of the major U.S. equity market 
indices reached record highs during the final quarter of 
fiscal 2014. The fixed income markets experienced a 
more difficult year as longer-term market interest rates 
increased, due in part to the Federal Reserve tapering 
its bond buying program. While the economic outlook 
has remained more positive than in recent years, the 
financial environment in which we operate still reflects a 
heightened level of sensitivity as we move into fiscal 2015.

All three major U.S. equity market indices and the Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index increased during the 
past three fiscal years, while the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index was slightly negative in fiscal 2014, after 
increasing during fiscal 2012 and 2013, as illustrated in the table below:

Indices(1)
Dow Jones Industrial Average
S&P 500
NASDAQ Composite Index
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index

% Change for the Year Ended March 31,

2014
12.9%
19.3%
28.5%
(0.1)%
1.9%

2013
10.3%
11.4%
5.7%
3.8%
1.3%

2012

7.2%
6.2%
11.2%
7.7%
5.3%

(1)  Indices are trademarks of Dow Jones & Company, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc., and Barclays Capital, respectively, which are not 

affiliated with Legg Mason.

18

Legg MasonThe following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) as a 
percentage of operating revenues and the increase (decrease) by item as a percentage of the amount for the previous period:

Percentage of Operating Revenues

Period to Period Change(1)

Years Ended March 31,

2014

2013

2012

2014  
Compared 
to 2013

2013 
Compared 
to 2012

28.4%

28.0%

29.1%

6.4%

(5.8)%

Operating Revenues

Investment advisory fees

Separate accounts

Funds

Performance fees

Distribution and service fees

Other

Total Operating Revenues

Operating Expenses

Compensation and benefits

Transition-related compensation

Total Compensation and Benefits

Distribution and servicing

Communications and technology

Occupancy

Amortization of intangible assets

Impairment of intangible assets

Other

Total Operating Expenses

Operating Income (Loss)

Other Non-Operating Income (Expense)

Interest income

Interest expense

Other income (expense), net

Other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated 

investment vehicles, net
Total other non-operating expense

Income (Loss) before Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net Income (Loss)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to  

noncontrolling interests

54.7

3.9

12.7

0.3

55.3

3.8

12.6

0.3

56.0

1.9

12.8

0.2

100.0

100.0

100.0

44.1

—

44.1

22.6

5.8

4.2

0.4

—

7.2

84.3

15.7

0.2

(1.9)

1.2

0.1

(0.4)

15.3

5.0

10.3

(0.1)

45.5

—

45.5

23.0

5.7

6.6

0.5

28.1

7.2

116.6

(16.6)

0.3

(2.4)

(0.7)

(0.1)

(2.9)

(19.5)

(5.7)

(13.8)

(0.3)

41.7

1.3

43.0

24.4

6.2

5.8

0.7

—

7.2

87.3

12.7

0.4

(3.3)

0.8

0.8

(1.3)

11.4

2.7

8.7

0.4

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

10.4%

(13.5)%

8.3%

n/m—not meaningful
(1)  Calculated based on the change in actual amounts between fiscal years as a percentage of the prior year amount.

3.8

8.6

5.2

16.7

4.9

1.8

n/m

1.8

3.1

5.5

(33.0)

(12.1)

n/m

4.0

(24.2)

n/m

(15.8)

(15.9)

n/m

n/m

(85.2)

n/m

n/m

n/m

(54.1)

n/m

(3.0)

99.2

(3.1)

35.8

(1.9)

7.1

n/m

3.9

(7.6)

(9.1)

11.0

(28.6)

n/m

(1.2)

31.1

n/m

(33.9)

(28.2)

n/m

n/m

n/m

n/m

n/m

n/m

n/m

n/m

19

Legg MasonASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT

Our AUM is primarily managed across the following asset classes:

Equity

Fixed Income

•  Large Cap Growth
•  Small Cap Core
•  Large Cap Value
•  Equity Income
•  Global Equity
•  Sector Equity
•  International Equity
•  Mid Cap Core
•  Global Emerging Market Equity

•  U.S. Intermediate Investment Grade
•  Global Government
•  U.S. Credit Aggregate
•  Global Opportunistic Fixed Income
•  U.S. Municipal
•  Global Fixed Income
•  U.S. Long Duration
•  U.S. Limited Duration
•  U.S. High Yield
•  Emerging Markets

Liquidity

•  U.S. Managed Cash
•  U.S. Municipal Cash

The components of the changes in our AUM (in billions) 
for the years ended March 31, were as follows:

Beginning of period

$664.6

$643.3

$677.6

  2014

  2013

  2012

Investment funds, excluding 

liquidity funds(1)

Subscriptions

Redemptions

Separate account flows, net

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other(2)

52.1

44.9

46.9

(58.1)

(49.0)

(51.1)

2.5

11.8

8.3

30.2

(27.4)

(35.9)

19.8

12.6

(11.7)

(27.5)

34.2

17.1

Acquisitions (dispositions), net

(1.3)

(1.2)

(23.9)

End of period

$701.8

$664.6

$643.3

(1)  Subscriptions and redemptions reflect the gross activity in the funds and 
include assets transferred between funds and between share classes.
(2)  Includes the negative impact of foreign exchange movements, primarily 
on  fixed  income  securities,  of  $4.9  billion,  $8.3  billion,  and  $1.8  billion 
for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Also 
includes reinvestment of dividends and other.

AUM at March 31, 2014 was $701.8 billion, an increase of 
$37.2 billion, or 6%, from March 31, 2013. The increase 
in AUM was attributable to net client inflows of $8.3 
billion and market performance and other of $30.2 billion, 
partially offset by the disposition of $1.3 billion resulting 
from the sale of a small affiliate. Market performance and 
other includes $4.9 million resulting from the negative 
impact of foreign currency exchange fluctuations. There 
were $12.1 billion of net client inflows into the liquidity 
asset class and $3.8 billion of net outflows from long-
term asset classes. Equity outflows of $5.0 billion 
were partially offset by fixed income inflows of $1.2 
billion. Equity outflows occurred in products managed 
at Royce & Associates (“Royce”), Batterymarch, The 

Permal Group, Ltd. (“Permal”), and ClearBridge, LLC, 
formerly Legg Mason Capital Management (“LMCM”), 
and were partially offset by equity inflows at ClearBridge 
Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”). Due in part to product 
investment performance, we have experienced net annual 
outflows in our equity asset class since fiscal 2007. Fixed 
income inflows were primarily in products managed 
by Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC 
(“Brandywine”), and were partially offset by outflows 
principally at Western Asset Management Company 
(“Western Asset”), including $4.8 billion in outflows from 
a single, low-fee global sovereign mandate managed 
by Western Asset. As previously discussed, in the first 
quarter of fiscal 2015, we will begin reporting AUA, which 
will primarily be related to QS Investors. In addition, 
approximately $13 billion of fixed income assets classified 
as AUM as of March 31, 2014 will be reclassified to AUA in 
the first quarter of fiscal 2015, including the assets related 
to this low-fee global sovereign mandate. We experienced 
net fixed income inflows in fiscal 2014, after experiencing 
net fixed income outflows during the prior five fiscal years. 
We generally earn higher fees and profits on equity AUM, 
and outflows in the equity asset class will more negatively 
impact our revenues and Net Income (Loss) Attributable 
to Legg Mason, Inc. than would outflows in other asset 
classes. During the month ended April 30, 2014, we 
experienced liquidity outflows of approximately $20 billion, 
primarily from a low-fee money market fund. We do not 
expect this outflow to have a material impact on our 
revenues or net income.

AUM at March 31, 2013, was $664.6 billion, an increase 
of $21.3 billion, or 3%, from March 31, 2012. The increase 
in AUM was attributable to market performance and other 
of $34.2 billion and $5.4 billion related to the acquisition 
of Fauchier Partners Management Limited (“Fauchier”). 
Market performance and other includes $8.3 billion 

20

Legg Masonresulting from the negative impact of foreign currency 
exchange fluctuations. These increases were offset in 
part by net client outflows of $11.7 billion and dispositions 
of $6.6 billion. The dispositions were in liquidity assets 
which resulted from the amendment of historical Smith 
Barney brokerage programs providing for investment in 
liquidity funds that our asset managers manage. Long-
term asset classes accounted for the net client outflows, 
with $20.4 billion and $11.0 billion in equity and fixed 
income outflows, respectively, partially offset by liquidity 
inflows of $19.7 billion. Equity outflows were primarily 
experienced by products managed at Batterymarch, 
Royce, Permal, and LMCM. The majority of fixed income 
outflows were in products managed by Western Asset, 
including $6.4 billion in outflows from the low-fee global 
sovereign mandate discussed above. Fixed income 

outflows at Western Asset were offset in part by fixed 
income inflows at Brandywine.

Our investment advisory and administrative contracts are 
generally terminable at will or upon relatively short notice, 
and investors in the mutual funds that we manage may 
redeem their investments in the funds at any time without 
prior notice. Institutional and individual clients can terminate 
their relationships with us, reduce the aggregate amount 
of assets under management, or shift their funds to other 
types of accounts with different rate structures for any 
number of reasons, including investment performance, 
changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in our 
reputation in the marketplace, changes in management or 
control of clients or third-party distributors with whom we 
have relationships, loss of key investment management 
personnel or financial market performance.

AUM by Asset Class
AUM by asset class (in billions) for the years ended March 31 were as follows:

Equity

Fixed Income

Liquidity

Total

2014

% of Total

2013

% of Total

2012

% of Total

$186.4 

365.2 

150.2 

27% 

$161.8 

24% 

$163.4 

52 

21 

365.1 

137.7 

55 

21 

356.1 

123.8 

26% 

55 

19 

$701.8 

100% 

$664.6 

100% 

$643.3 

100% 

Average AUM by asset class (in billions) for the years ended March 31 were as follows:

Equity

Fixed Income

Liquidity

Total

2014

% of Total

2013

% of Total

2012

% of Total

$172.8

358.7

135.9

$667.4

26%

$152.1

24%

$168.4

54

20

364.5

128.9

56

20

359.8

116.6

26%

56

18

100%

$645.5

100%

$644.8

100%

% Change

2014 
Compared to 
2013

2013 
Compared to 
2012

15% 

— 

9 

6%

(1)%

3

11

3%

% Change

2014 
Compared to 
2013

2013 
Compared to 
2012

14%

(2)

5

3%

(10)%

1

11

—%

21

Legg MasonThe component changes in our AUM by asset class (in billions) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 
were as follows: 

Equity

$189.6

Fixed Income

Liquidity

$356.6

$131.4

Total

$677.6

21.7

(30.4)

(12.6)

—

(21.3)

(2.1)

(2.8)

25.2

(20.7)

(23.1)

—

(18.6)

19.3

(1.2)

163.4

356.1

18.9

(26.4)

(12.9)

—

(20.4)

13.4

5.4

26.0

(22.6)

(14.4)

—

(11.0)

20.0

—

—

—

(0.2)

12.6

12.4

(0.1)

(19.9)

123.8

—

—

(0.1)

19.8

19.7

0.8

(6.6)

46.9

(51.1)

(35.9)

12.6

(27.5)

17.1

(23.9)

643.3

44.9

(49.0)

(27.4)

19.8

(11.7)

34.2

(1.2)

161.8

365.1

 137.7

664.6

27.0

(30.1)

(1.9)

—

(5.0)

30.9

(1.3)

25.1

(28.0)

4.1

—

1.2

(1.1)

—

—

—

0.3

11.8

12.1

0.4

—

52.1

(58.1)

2.5

11.8

8.3

30.2

(1.3)

$186.4

$365.2

$150.2

$701.8

March 31, 2011

Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds

Subscriptions

Redemptions

Separate account flows, net

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other

Acquisitions (dispositions), net

March 31, 2012

Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds

Subscriptions

Redemptions

Separate account flows, net

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other

Acquisitions (dispositions), net

March 31, 2013

Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds

Subscriptions

Redemptions

Separate account flows, net

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other

Acquisitions (dispositions), net

March 31, 2014

22

Legg MasonAUM by Distribution Channel
We have two principal distribution channels, Global 
Distribution and Affiliate/Other, through which we 
sell a variety of investment products and services. 
Global Distribution, which consists of our centralized 
global distribution operations, principally sells U.S. 
and international mutual funds and other commingled 

vehicles, retail separately managed account programs, 
and sub-advisory accounts for insurance companies and 
similar clients. Affiliate/Other consists of the distribution 
operations within our asset managers which principally 
sell institutional separate accounts and liquidity (money 
market) funds.

The component changes in our AUM by distribution channel (in billions) for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 
2012, were as follows:

March 31, 2011

Net client cash flows, excluding liquidity funds

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other

Acquisitions/(dispositions), net

March 31, 2012

Net client cash flows, excluding liquidity funds

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other

Acquisitions/(dispositions), net

March 31, 2013

Net client cash flows, excluding liquidity funds

Liquidity fund flows, net

Net client cash flows

Market performance and other

Acquisitions/(dispositions), net

March 31, 2014

Global 
Distribution

Affiliate/Other

$220.3

$457.3

Total

$677.6

(2.3)

—

(2.3)

2.6

—

220.6

2.2

—

2.2

9.3

—

232.1

(1.2)

—

(1.2)

16.5

—

(37.8)

12.6

(25.2)

14.5

(23.9)

422.7

(33.7)

19.8

(13.9)

24.9

(1.2)

432.5

(2.3)

11.8

9.5

13.7

(1.3)

(40.1)

12.6

(27.5)

17.1

(23.9)

643.3

(31.5)

19.8

(11.7)

34.2

(1.2)

664.6

(3.5)

11.8

8.3

30.2

(1.3)

$247.4

$454.4

$701.8

Our overall effective fee rate across all asset classes 
and distribution channels was 34 basis points for each 
of the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, and was 
35 basis points for the year ended March 31, 2012. 
Fees for managing equity assets are generally higher, 
averaging approximately 70 basis points for the year 
ended March 31, 2014, and 75 basis points for each 
of the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. This 
compares to fees for managing fixed income assets, 
which averaged approximately 25 basis points for each 
of the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and 
liquidity assets, which averaged under 10 basis points 
(reflecting the impact of current advisory fee waivers due 

to the low interest rate environment) for each of the years 
ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Equity assets are 
primarily managed by ClearBridge, Royce, Batterymarch, 
and Permal; fixed income assets are primarily managed 
by Western Asset, Brandywine, and Permal; and liquidity 
assets are primarily managed by Western Asset. Fee 
rates for assets distributed through Legg Mason Global 
Distribution, which are predominately retail in nature, 
averaged approximately 50 basis points for each of the 
years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, while fee 
rates for assets distributed through the Affiliate/Other 
channel averaged approximately 30 basis points for each 
of the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

23

Legg MasonInvestment Performance
Overall investment performance of our AUM for the years 
ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, was generally 
positive compared to relevant benchmarks.

Year Ended March 31, 2014
For the year ended March 31, 2014, most U.S. indices 
produced positive returns. The best performing was the 
NASDAQ Composite, returning 28.5%. These returns 
were achieved in an economic environment characterized 
by uneven global growth and heightened sensitivity to 
economic news such as concerns for economic growth in 
China and the ongoing Ukraine/Russia crisis.

In the fixed income markets, the Federal Reserve kept 
the target rate and discount rate steady while tapering the 
bond-buying program. The yield curve steepened over the 
year but flattened in the last quarter as many long-dated 
yields declined.

The lowest yielding fixed income sector for the year was 
U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (“TIPS”), as 
measured by the Barclays U.S. TIPS Index which returned 
(6.5)%. The best performing fixed income sector for the 
year was high yield bonds as measured by the Barclays 
U.S. High Yield Bond Index which returned 7.5% as of 
March 31, 2014.

Year Ended March 31, 2013
For the year ended March 31, 2013, most U.S. indices 
produced positive returns. The best performing was the 
S&P 400 Mid Cap Index, which returned 17.8% for the 
year ended March 31, 2013. These returns were achieved 
in an economic environment characterized by uneven 
domestic growth and heightened sensitivity to economic 
news which included improving unemployment and 
housing figures, the anticipation and implementation of 
the sequestration, concerns surrounding the fiscal cliff, 
and periodic developments in the continuing European 
sovereign debt crisis.

In the fixed income markets, the Federal Reserve affirmed 
its commitment to hold the federal funds rate at historic 
lows, by beginning a third round of quantitative easing and 
continuing support of the secondary mortgage market. 
These actions were taken to keep interest rates low and 
stimulate economic growth, and resulted in a downward 
shift in the yield curve over the year.

The lowest yielding fixed income sector for the year was 
U.S. government bonds, as measured by the Barclays U.S. 
Government Bond Index, which returned 3.0%. The best 
performing fixed income sector for the year was high yield 
bonds as measured by the Barclays U.S. High Yield Bond 
Index, which returned 13.1% as of March 31, 2013.

Year Ended March 31, 2012
For the year ended March 31, 2012, the equity markets 
ended a difficult year on a positive note, responding 
favorably to improving unemployment figures, the 
conclusion of bank stress tests resulting in certain banks 
increasing dividends, and reduced fears of a European 
debt fallout. As a result, most U.S. indices produced 
positive returns for our full fiscal year. The most notable 
was the NASDAQ Composite, which returned 11.2% for 
the year ended March 31, 2012.

In the fixed income markets, improved economic data 
suggested that the recovery was strengthening. Flights-to-
safety ebbed as the European debt crisis eased, allowing 
U.S. Treasury rates to climb from historically low levels. 
The yield curve steepened over the year as economic 
releases from the Federal Reserve Board painted an 
increasingly optimistic picture and talk of a third round of 
quantitative easing diminished.

The worst performing fixed income sector for the year 
was high yield bonds, as measured by the Barclays High 
Yield Index, which returned 6.5%. The best performing 
fixed income sector for the year was TIPS, as measured 
by the Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, which returned 12.2% as 
of March 31, 2012.

24

Legg MasonThe following table presents a summary of the percentages of our AUM by strategy(1) that outpaced their respective 
benchmarks as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, for the trailing 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods:

As of March 31, 2014

As of March 31, 2013

As of March 31, 2012

1-year

3-year

5-year

10-year

1-year

3-year

5-year 10-year 1-year

3-year

5-year 10-year

Total (includes liquidity)

75%

87%

84%

92%

84%

85%

88%

91% 62%

81%

70%

87%

Equity:

Large cap

Small cap

Total equity  

(includes other 
equity)

Fixed income:

67%

33%

91%

26%

52%

29%

76%

82%

65%

13%

68%

15%

88%

27%

80% 66%

62% 49%

43%

63%

66%

88%

78%

89%

54%

69%

45%

77%

48%

50%

62%

71% 53%

52%

66%

80%

U.S. taxable

94%

94%

94%

97%

96%

94%

91%

90% 66%

U.S. tax-exempt

  0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2%

Global taxable

Total fixed income

54%

74%

82%

91%

98%

96%

93%

96%

89%

94%

94%

94%

95%

93%

98% 38%

94% 51%

95%

2%

93%

87%

61%

2%

70%

60%

89%

1%

97%

84%

The following table presents a summary of the percentages of our U.S. mutual fund assets(2) that outpaced their Lipper 
category averages as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, for the trailing 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods:

As of March 31, 2014

As of March 31, 2013

As of March 31, 2012

1-year

3-year

5-year

10-year

1-year

3-year

5-year 10-year 1-year

3-year

5-year 10-year

Total (includes liquidity)

44%

63%

56%

68%

59% 57% 70% 64% 67% 66% 78%

74%

Equity:

Large cap

Small cap

Total equity  

(includes other 
equity)

Fixed income:

U.S. taxable

U.S. tax-exempt

Global taxable

Total fixed income

49%

27%

86%

19%

55%

25%

54%

72%

90% 79% 77% 40% 78%

51%

48% 45%

27% 16% 48% 68% 44% 63% 93% 98%

39%

55%

42%

60%

56% 44% 59% 53% 57% 56% 73%

71%

80%

27%

27%

54%

85%

61%

86%

78%

92%

68%

84%

83%

85%

86%

86%

86%

74%

92% 85% 90% 76%

50% 57% 86% 84%

91%

91%

70%

82% 83%

91%

82%

71%

74%

95% 54% 96% 81%

87% 83%

64% 76% 87% 85% 84%

81%

87% 83%

(1)  For purposes of investment performance comparisons, strategies are an aggregation of discretionary portfolios (separate accounts, investment funds, 
and other products) into a single group that represents a particular investment objective. In the case of separate accounts, the investment performance 
of the account is based upon the performance of the strategy to which the account has been assigned. Each of our asset managers has its own specific 
guidelines for including portfolios in their strategies. For those managers which manage both separate accounts and investment funds in the same strat-
egy, the performance comparison for all of the assets is based upon the performance of the separate account.
As of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 91%, 90% and 91% of total AUM is included in strategy AUM, respectively, although not all strategies have three-, 
five-, and ten-year  histories. Total  strategy AUM includes liquidity assets.  Certain assets are  not included  in reported performance  comparisons. These 
include: accounts that are not managed in accordance with the guidelines outlined above; accounts in strategies not marketed to potential clients; accounts 
that have not yet been assigned to a strategy; and certain smaller products at some of our affiliates.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. For AUM included in institutional and retail separate accounts and investment funds included in the 
same strategy as separate accounts, performance comparisons are based on gross-of-fee performance. For investment funds (including fund-of-hedge 
funds) which are not managed in a separate account format, performance comparisons are based on net-of-fee performance. These performance com-
parisons do not reflect the actual performance of any specific separate account or investment fund; individual separate account and investment fund 
performance may differ.
Certain prior year amounts have been updated to conform to the current year presentation.

(2)  Source: Lipper Inc. includes open-end, closed-end, and variable annuity funds. As of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the U.S. long-term mutual fund 
assets represented in the data accounted for 20%, 19% and 18%, respectively, of our total AUM. The performance of our U.S. long-term mutual fund 
assets is included in the strategies.

25

Legg Mason 
 
 
The following table presents a summary of the absolute and relative performance compared to the applicable benchmark 
for a representative sample of funds within our AUM, net of management and other fees as of the end of the period 
presented, for the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, and from each fund’s inception. The table below includes 
a representative sample of funds from each significant subclass of our investment strategies (i.e., large cap equity, small 
cap equity, etc.). The funds within this group are representative of the performance of significant investment strategies 
we offer, that as of March 31, 2014, constituted an aggregate of approximately $410 billion, or approximately 58% of 
our total AUM. The only meaningful exclusions are our funds-of-hedge funds strategies, which involve privately placed 
hedge funds, and represent only 3% of our total assets under management as of March 31, 2014, for which investment 
performance is not made publicly available. Providing investment returns of funds provides a relevant representation of 
our performance while avoiding the many complexities relating to factors such as multiple fee structures, bundled pricing, 
and asset level break points, that would arise in reporting performance for strategies or other product aggregations.

Fund Name/Index

Equity

Large Cap

Inception 
Date

Performance 
Type(1)

Annualized Absolute/Relative Total Return (%)  
vs. Benchmark

1-year

3-year

5-year

10-year

Inception

ClearBridge Appreciation Fund

3/10/1970

Absolute

18.42% 13.56% 18.47%

7.46% 10.44%

S&P 500

ClearBridge All Cap Value

Russell 3000 Value

Relative

(3.43)% (1.10)% (2.69)%

0.04% (0.06)%

11/12/1981

Absolute

18.34%

9.70% 18.86%

5.34% 10.44%

Relative

(3.32)% (4.93)% (3.02)%

(2.28)% (1.73)%

Legg Mason Capital Management Value Trust

4/16/1982

Absolute

27.64% 14.94% 21.69%

2.25% 12.15%

S&P 500

Relative

5.78%

0.29%

0.53%

(5.16)%

0.20%

ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund

10/24/1983

Absolute

32.29% 19.97% 26.69%

8.50% 12.66%

Russell 3000 Growth

Relative

8.76%

5.44%

4.75%

ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund

12/31/1988

Absolute

21.75% 15.22% 20.51%

0.55%

7.37%

2.69%

9.70%

Russell 1000 Value

ClearBridge Equity Income

Russell 3000 Value

Relative

0.18%

0.42% (1.25)%

(0.22)% (0.87)%

11/6/1992

Absolute

15.20% 14.02% 18.12%

6.70%

8.66%

Relative

(6.46)% (0.61)% (3.76)%

(0.91)% (1.60)%

ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund

8/29/1997

Absolute

24.40% 16.70% 19.81%

Relative

1.18%

2.07% (1.87)%

6.18%

(1.69)%

7.67%

2.14%

9/7/2010

Absolute

21.33% 14.97%

Relative

(0.24)%

0.17%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

18.74%

0.82%

Russell 1000 Growth

Legg Mason Brandywine Diversified  

Large Cap Value Fund

Russell 1000 Value

Small Cap

Royce Pennsylvania Mutual

6/30/1967

Absolute

23.18% 10.95% 23.36%

9.36% 12.23%

Russell 2000

Royce Premier Fund

Russell 2000

Royce Total Return Fund

Russell 2000

Royce Special Equity

Russell 2000

Relative

(1.72)% (2.23)% (0.95)%

0.82%

n/a

12/31/1991

Absolute

21.85%

9.27% 22.07%

10.99% 12.61%

Relative

(3.05)% (3.91)% (2.24)%

2.46%

2.58%

12/15/1993

Absolute

20.65% 12.19% 21.61%

8.70% 11.60%

Relative

(4.25)% (0.99)% (2.70)%

0.17%

2.39%

5/1/1998

Absolute

18.15% 11.95% 19.99%

8.86% 10.12%

Relative

(6.75)% (1.24)% (4.33)%

0.33%

2.57%

ClearBridge Small Cap Growth

7/1/1998

Absolute

26.46% 16.88% 26.18%

9.85% 11.23%

Russell 2000 Growth

Fixed Income

U.S. Taxable

Relative

(0.74)%

3.27%

0.94%

0.99%

4.69%

Western Asset Core Bond Fund

9/4/1990

Absolute

Barclays US Aggregate

Relative

Western Asset Short Term Bond Fund

11/11/1991

Absolute

0.85%

0.94%

0.58%

Citi Treasury Gov’t/Credit 1–3 YR

Relative

(0.09)%

4.37% 10.86%

0.62%

1.50%

0.33%

6.06%

5.38%

3.46%

4.95%

0.49%

1.94%

7.26%

0.68%

3.87%

(0.88)% (0.71)%

26

Legg Mason 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1.75%

1.65%

5.29%

5.13%

6.75% 14.52%

0.94%

3.84%

0.71%

5.63%

7.63%

3.45%

5.06% 10.90%

1.31%

3.26%

6.10%

5.38%

0.48%

1.79%

2.97%

0.08% (0.11)%

4.52%

(0.68)%

4.79%

0.85%

5.80%

1.34%

4.41%

6.76%

0.04%

7.62%

2.06%

6.55%

1.13%

5.82%

(0.11)% (0.17)%

0.60%

9.83%

5.03%

n/a

n/a

(0.71)% (1.20)%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

5.42%

0.19%

18.55%

11.34%

Fund Name/Index

Inception 
Date

Performance 
Type(1)

Annualized Absolute/Relative Total Return (%)  
vs. Benchmark

1-year

3-year

5-year

10-year

Inception

Western Asset Adjustable Rate Income

6/22/1992

Absolute

Citi T-Bill 6-Month

Relative

Western Asset Corporate Bond Fund

11/6/1992

Absolute

Barclays US Credit

Relative

Western Asset Intermediate Bond Fund

7/1/1994

Absolute

Barclays Intermediate Gov’t/Credit

Western Asset Core Plus Fund

Barclays US Aggregate

Relative

7/8/1998

Absolute

Relative

0.85%

0.76%

3.47%

2.46%

0.26%

0.39%

1.13%

1.23%

Western Asset Inflation Index Plus Bond

3/1/2001

Absolute

(6.47)%

Barclays US TIPS

Western Asset High Yield Fund

Barclays US Corp High Yield

9/28/2001

Absolute

6.79%

8.40% 18.85%

7.98%

8.46%

Relative

0.02% (0.24)%

Relative

(0.75)% (0.60)%

Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained

7/6/2006

Absolute

1.75%

3.50%

Barclays US Aggregate

Relative

1.84% (0.25)%

Western Asset Mortgage Defined Opportunity 

Fund Inc.

2/24/2010

Absolute

13.77% 16.03%

BOFAML Floating Rate Home Loan Index

Relative

10.37% 10.44%

U.S. Tax-Exempt

Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund

3/4/1981

Absolute

Barclays Municipal Bond

Global Taxable

Legg Mason Western Asset Australian  

Bond Trust

UBS Australian Composite Bond Index

Relative

6/30/1983

Absolute

Relative

Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund

2/22/1995

Absolute

(0.96)%

(1.35)%

7.55%

1.76%

7.42%

1.71%

4.97%

0.52%

7.98%

0.50%

4.36%

1.04%

5.53%

7.66%

0.92%

7.77%

8.14%

2.19%

17.78%

6.70%

0.65%

7.21%

6.42%

0.64%

7.95%

Barclays Global High Yield

Relative

(3.47)% (1.54)% (0.96)%

(2.17)% (1.98)%

Legg Mason Western Asset Core Plus Global 

Bond Trust

2/28/1995

Absolute

2.94%

8.24% 11.72%

5.91%

5.98%

Barclays Global Aggregate (AUD Hedged)

Relative

Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt

10/17/1996

Absolute

(0.74)%

(3.75)%

0.22%

3.38%

(1.36)% (1.02)%

4.63% 12.67%

8.20% 10.44%

JPM EMBI Global

Legg Mason Western Asset Global Multi 

Relative

(2.70)% (2.52)%

1.13%

(0.11)%

0.83%

Strategy Fund

8/31/2002

Absolute

(1.02)%

2.80%

9.51%

5.37%

7.24%

50% Bar. Global Agg./25% Bar. HY 2%/25%  

JPM EMBI +

Relative

(3.37)% (2.53)% (0.27)%

(1.22)% (0.96)%

Legg Mason Brandywine Global Fixed Income

10/31/2003

Absolute

Citi World Gov’t Bond

Relative

Legg Mason Brandywine Global Opportunities 

Bond

Citi World Gov’t Bond

Liquidity

11/1/2006

Absolute

Relative

(0.50)%

(1.87)%

0.60%

(0.78)%

4.22%

2.31%

6.22%

4.31%

9.09%

5.25%

5.02%

0.79%

11.51%

7.67%

n/a

n/a

5.46%

0.65%

7.24%

2.67%

Western Asset Institutional Cash Reserves Ltd.

12/31/1989

Absolute

Citi 3-Month T-Bill

Relative

0.08%

0.03%

0.14%

0.08%

0.21%

0.12%

1.89%

0.32%

3.57%

0.31%

(1)  Absolute performance is the actual performance (i.e., rate of return) of the fund. Relative performance is the difference (or variance) between the perfor-

mance of the fund and its stated benchmark.

27

Legg Mason 
 
 
 
 
BUSINESS MODEL STREAMLINING INITIATIVE
In May 2010, we announced an initiative to streamline our 
business model to drive increased profitability and growth 
that primarily involved transitioning certain shared services 
to our investment affiliates who are closer to the actual 
client relationships. The initiative resulted in over $140 
million in annual cost savings, substantially all of which 
were cash savings. These cost savings consisted of (i) over 
$80 million in compensation and benefits cost reductions 
resulting from eliminating positions in certain corporate 
shared services functions as a result of transitioning 
such functions to the affiliates, and charging affiliates 
for other centralized services that have continued to be 
provided to them without any corresponding adjustment in 
revenue sharing or other compensation arrangements; (ii) 
approximately $50 million in non-compensation costs from 
eliminating and streamlining activities in our corporate and 
distribution business units, including savings associated 
with consolidating office space; and (iii) approximately $10 
million from our global distribution group sharing in affiliate 
revenues from retail assets under management without 
any corresponding adjustment in revenue sharing or other 
compensation arrangements.

The initiative involved $127.5 million in transition-related 
costs that primarily included charges for employee 
termination benefits and incentives to retain employees 
during the transition period. The transition-related 
costs also included charges for consolidating leased 
office space, early contract terminations, accelerated 
depreciation of fixed assets, asset disposals and 
professional fees. During the year ended March 31, 2012, 

transition-related costs totaled $73.1 million. All transition-
related costs were accrued as of the completion of the 
initiative on March 31, 2012. We achieved total annual 
cost savings from the initiative of approximately $140 
million and $97 million as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, 
respectively, when compared to similar expenses prior 
to the commencement of the streamlining initiative. A 
portion of the estimated transition-related savings in fiscal 
2013 were incremental to fiscal 2012, and are explained, 
where applicable, in the results of operations discussion 
to follow. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial 
Statements for additional information on our business 
streamlining initiative.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In accordance with financial accounting standards on 
consolidation, we consolidate and separately identify 
certain sponsored investment vehicles, the most 
significant of which is a collateralized loan obligation entity 
(“CLO”). The consolidation of these investment vehicles 
has no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg 
Mason, Inc. and does not have a material impact on our 
consolidated operating results. We also hold investments 
in other consolidated sponsored investment funds and 
the change in the value of these investments, which 
is recorded in Other non-operating income (expense), 
is reflected in our Net Income (Loss), net of amounts 
allocated to noncontrolling interests, if any. See Notes 1, 
3, and 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
for additional information regarding the consolidation of 
investment vehicles.

Operating Revenues
The components of total operating revenues (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes between periods were 
as follows:

Years Ended March 31,

2014 Compared to 2013

2013 Compared to 2012

2014

2013

2012

$ Change % Change

$ Change % Change

Investment advisory fees:

Separate accounts

$   777.4

$   730.3

$   775.5

$  47.1

6.4%

$(45.2)

(5.8)%

Funds

Performance fees

Distribution and service fees

Other

1,501.3

1,446.1

1,491.3

107.1

347.6

8.4

98.6

330.5

7.2

49.5

341.0

5.3

55.2

8.5

17.1

1.2

Total operating revenues

$2,741.8

$2,612.7

$2,662.6

$129.1

3.8

8.6

5.2

16.7

4.9%

(45.2)

49.1

(10.5)

1.9

(3.0)

99.2

(3.1)

35.8

$(49.9)

(1.9)%

28

Legg MasonTotal operating revenues for the year ended March 31, 
2014, were $2.74 billion, an increase of 4.9% from $2.61 
billion for the year ended March 31, 2013. This increase 
was primarily due to the impact of a 3% increase in 
average long-term AUM and an increase in average AUM 
advisory revenue yields, from 33.7 basis points in the 
year ended March 31, 2013 to 34.1 basis points in the 
year ended March 31, 2014. The increase in average AUM 
advisory revenue yields was the result of a slightly more 
favorable average asset mix, with equity assets, which 
generally earn higher fees than fixed income and liquidity 
assets, comprising a slightly higher percentage of our 
total average AUM for the year ended March 31, 2014, as 
compared to the year ended March 31, 2013. 

Total operating revenues for the year ended March 31, 
2013, were $2.61 billion, a decrease of 1.9% from $2.66 
billion for the year ended March 31, 2012, despite average 
AUM remaining essentially flat. This decrease was 
primarily due to the impact of a reduction in average AUM 
advisory revenue yields, from 35.2 basis points in the year 
ended March 31, 2012, to 33.7 basis points in the year 
ended March 31, 2013. The reduction in average AUM 
advisory revenue yields was the result of a less favorable 
average asset mix, with equity assets, which generally 
earn higher fees than fixed income and liquidity assets, 
comprising a lower percentage of our total average AUM 
for the year ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the 
year ended March 31, 2012. This decrease was offset in 
part by a $49.1 million increase in performance fees. 

Investment Advisory Fees from Separate Accounts
For the year ended March 31, 2014, investment advisory 
fees from separate accounts increased $47.1 million, or 
6.4%, to $777.4 million, as compared to $730.3 million for 
the year ended March 31, 2013. Of this increase, $32.8 
million was the result of higher average equity assets 
managed by ClearBridge, $23.2 million resulted from 
higher revenues at Permal, including those resulting from 
the acquisition of Fauchier in March 2013, and $7.9 million 
was due to higher average fixed income assets managed 
by Brandywine. These increases were offset in part by 
a decrease of $17.6 million due to lower average equity 
assets managed by Batterymarch and a decrease of $6.8 
million due to the sale of a small affiliate in August 2013.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, investment advisory 
fees from separate accounts decreased $45.2 million, or 
5.8%, to $730.3 million, as compared to $775.5 million for 
the year ended March 31, 2012. Of this decrease, $41.5 
million was the result of lower average equity assets 
managed by Batterymarch, LMCM and Legg Mason 
Global Equities Group (“LMGE”), and $12.3 million was 
due to the divestiture of an affiliate in February 2012. 

These decreases were offset in part by an increase of 
$9.6 million due to higher average fixed income assets 
managed by Brandywine.

Investment Advisory Fees from Funds
For the year ended March 31, 2014, investment advisory 
fees from funds increased $55.2 million, or 3.8%, to $1.5 
billion, as compared to $1.4 billion for the year ended 
March 31, 2013. Of this increase, $85.6 million was due 
to higher average equity assets managed by ClearBridge 
and $16.5 million was due to higher average fixed income 
assets managed by Brandywine, offset in part by a 
decrease of $48.7 million due to lower average fixed 
income assets managed by Western Asset.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, investment advisory 
fees from funds decreased $45.2 million, or 3.0%, to 
$1.4 billion, as compared to $1.5 billion for the year ended 
March 31, 2012. Of this decrease, $52.9 million was due 
to lower average assets managed by Permal, and $48.7 
million was due to lower average equity assets managed 
by Royce, LMCM and LMGE. These decreases were 
offset in part by a $39.1 million increase as a result of 
higher average fixed income assets managed by Western 
Asset and Brandywine, and a $16.7 million increase as a 
result of higher average equity assets at ClearBridge.

Performance Fees
Of our total AUM as of March 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, 
approximately 6% was in accounts that were eligible to 
earn performance fees. For the year ended March 31, 
2014, performance fees increased $8.5 million to $107.1 
million, as compared to $98.6 million for the year ended 
March 31, 2013, primarily due to higher fees earned on 
assets managed at Permal, including those resulting from 
the Fauchier acquisition, offset in part by the impact of 
$32.0 million of fees received by Western Asset in the 
prior year, related to the wind-down of its participation in 
the U.S. Treasury’s Public-Private Investment Program 
(“PPIP”). Strong performance fees were heavily 
influenced by strong equity markets in fiscal 2014.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, performance fees 
increased $49.1 million to $98.6 million, as compared to 
$49.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, primarily 
due to $32.0 million of fees received by Western Asset 
related to the wind-down of its participation in the PPIP. 
Higher fees earned on assets managed at Permal and 
Brandywine also contributed to the increase. 

Distribution and Service Fees
For the year ended March 31, 2014, distribution and 
service fees increased $17.1 million, or 5.2%, to $347.6 
million, as compared to $330.5 million for the year ended 

29

Legg MasonMarch 31, 2013, resulting from an increase in average fee 
rates received on mutual fund AUM subject to distribution 
and service fees.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, distribution and 
service fees decreased $10.5 million, or 3.1%, to $330.5 

million, as compared to $341.0 million for the year ended 
March 31, 2012, resulting from a decline in average fee 
rates received on mutual fund AUM subject to distribution 
and service fees.

Operating Expenses
The components of total operating expenses (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes between periods were 
as follows:

Years Ended March 31,

2014 Compared to 2013

2013 Compared to 2012

2014

2013

2012

$ Change % Change

$ Change % Change

Compensation and benefits

$1,210.4

$1,188.5

$1,144.3

$  21.9

1.8%

$   44.2

3.9%

Distribution and servicing

Communications and technology

Occupancy

Amortization of intangible assets

Impairment of intangible assets

Other

619.1

157.9

115.2

12.3

—

196.0

600.6

149.7

171.9

14.0

734.0

188.4

649.7

164.7

154.8

19.6

—

190.7

18.5

8.2

(56.7)

(1.7)

3.1

5.5

(33.0)

(12.1)

(734.0)

     n/m

7.6

4.0

(49.1)

(15.0)

17.1

(5.6)

734.0

(2.3)

(7.6)

(9.1)

11.0

(28.6)

n/m

(1.2)

Total operating expenses

$2,310.9

$3,047.1

$2,323.8

$(736.2)

(24.2)%

$723.3

31.1%

n/m—not meaningful

Total operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 
2014, were $2.31 billion, a decrease of 24.2% from $3.05 
billion, for the year ended March 31, 2013. Total operating 
expenses for the year ended March 31, 2013, were $3.05 
billion, an increase of 31.1% from $2.32 billion for the 
year ended March 31, 2012. The change in total operating 
expenses for both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, was 
primarily the result of $734.0 million of intangible asset 
impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2013, as further 
discussed below. 

Operating expenses for the years ended March 31, 2014, 
2013, and 2012, incurred at the investment management 
affiliate level comprised approximately 70% of total 
operating expenses in each year, excluding the impairment 
charges, which are deemed to be corporate expenses. 
The remaining operating expenses are comprised of 
corporate and distribution costs.

30

Legg MasonCompensation and Benefits
The components of Total Compensation and Benefits (in millions) for the years ended March 31 were as follows:

Years Ended March 31,

2014 Compared to 2013

2013 Compared to 2012

2014

2013

2012

$ Change  % Change

$ Change % Change

Salaries and incentives

$   952.9

$   924.5

$   895.0

Benefits and payroll taxes

Transition-related costs

Management transition 
compensation costs

Other

219.7

—

4.0

33.8

204.5

—

17.9

41.6

196.7

34.6

—

18.0

$ 28.4

15.2

3.1%

7.4

— 

 n/m

(13.9)

(7.8)

(77.7)

(18.8)

$ 29.5

7.8

(34.6)

17.9

23.6

3.3%

4.0

n/m

n/m

131.1

Total Compensation and Benefits

$1,210.4

$1,188.5

$1,144.3

$ 21.9

1.8%

$ 44.2

3.9%

n/m—not meaningful

Total Compensation and Benefits for the year ended 
March 31, 2014, increased 1.8% to $1.21 billion, as 
compared to $1.19 billion for the year ended March 31, 
2013; and for the year ended March 31, 2013, increased 
3.9% to $1.19 billion, as compared to $1.14 billion for the 
year ended March 31, 2012:

•  Salaries and incentives increased $28.4 million, to 

$952.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, as 
compared to $924.5 million for the year ended March 
31, 2013, principally due to an increase of $11.7 million 
in incentive-based compensation at investment 
affiliates, primarily resulting from higher revenues, and 
an increase of $11.7 million in incentive-based 
compensation for corporate and distribution 
personnel, partially as a result of increased retail sales.

•  Salaries and incentives increased $29.5 million, to 

$924.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, as 
compared to $895.0 million for the year ended March 
31, 2012, principally due to an increase of $38.5 
million in incentive-based compensation at 
investment affiliates, primarily resulting from costs 
associated with the modification of employment and 
other arrangements, most significantly with the 
management of Permal, and the impact of reductions 
in other non-compensation related operating 
expenses at revenue share based affiliates, which 
create an offsetting increase in compensation per the 
applicable revenue share agreements. Additional 
salary and incentive costs of $12.2 million, resulting 
from market-based compensation increases among 
retained staff and new hires to support ongoing 
growth initiatives, also contributed to the increase. 
These increases were offset in part by a $23.7 
million decrease in corporate salaries primarily due to 
headcount reductions resulting from our business 
streamlining initiative.

•  Benefits and payroll taxes increased $15.2 million, to 
$219.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, as 
compared to $204.5 million for the year ended March 
31, 2013, primarily as a result of $4.4 million of costs 
associated with the previously discussed corporate 
initiatives, a $3.5 million increase in costs associated 
with certain employee benefit plans, a $2.5 million 
increase in health insurance expense, and a $2.2 million 
increase in payroll-related taxes.

•  Benefits and payroll taxes increased $7.8 million, to 

$204.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, as 
compared to $196.7 million for the year ended March 
31, 2012, primarily as a result of an increase in non-
cash amortization expense and other costs associated 
with certain deferred compensation plans.

•  Transition-related costs of $34.6 million for the year 

ended March 31, 2012, represent costs related to our 
business streamlining initiative, which was 
completed in March 2012. 

•  Management transition compensation costs of  
$4.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, 
represent amortization expense related to retention 
awards granted to certain executives and key 
employees in the prior year.

•  Management transition compensation costs of  

$17.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, were 
associated with our Chief Executive Officer stepping 
down in September 2012 and the subsequent 
reorganization of our executive committee. These 
costs were primarily comprised of $7.5 million of cash 
severance and $6.4 million of net non-cash 
accelerated vesting of stock based awards. Also 
included in this line item was $3.0 million of non-cash 
amortization expense related to retention awards 
granted to certain executives and key employees.

•  Other compensation and benefits decreased  

$7.8 million, to $33.8 million for the year ended 

31

Legg MasonMarch 31, 2014, as compared to $41.6 million for  
the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to a  
$19.5 million decrease in deferred compensation and 
revenue-share based incentive obligations resulting 
from a reduction in net market gains on assets 
invested for deferred compensation plans and seed 
capital investments, which were partially offset by 
corresponding decreases in Other non-operating 
income (expense). These decreases were offset, in 
part, by an $11.7 million increase in severance 
expense to $16.8 million, primarily related to the 
previously discussed corporate initiatives.
•  Other compensation and benefits increased  

$23.6 million, to $41.6 million, as compared to  
$18.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, 
primarily due to an increase in revenue-share based 
incentive obligations resulting from a $22.7 million 
increase in net market gains on assets invested for 
deferred compensation plans and seed capital 
investments, which were offset by corresponding 
increases in Other non-operating income (expense). 

For the year ended March 31, 2014, compensation as a 
percentage of operating revenues decreased to 44.1% 
from 45.5% for the year ended March 31, 2013, due to the 
impact of compensation decreases related to a reduction 
in net market gains on assets invested for deferred 
compensation plans and seed capital investments and 
the compensation impact of the wind-down of Western 
Asset’s participation in the PPIP in fiscal 2013.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, compensation as a 
percentage of operating revenues increased to 45.5% 
from 43.0% for the year ended March 31, 2012, due to the 
impact of reductions in other non-compensation related 
operating expenses at revenue share based affiliates, 
the impact of the modification of employment and other 
arrangements, as well as the impact of quasi-fixed 
compensation costs of administrative and distribution 
personnel which do not typically vary with revenues. These 
increases were offset in part by the impact of transition-
related compensation recorded in fiscal 2012, as well as the 
impact of lower corporate compensation costs, principally 
attributable to our business streamlining initiative.

Distribution and Servicing
For the year ended March 31, 2014, distribution and 
servicing expenses increased 3.1% to $619.1 million, as 
compared to $600.6 million for the year ended March 31, 
2013, with $15.2 million of the increase due to an increase 
in average AUM in certain products for which we pay fees 
to third-party distributors. 

For the year ended March 31, 2013, distribution and 
servicing expenses decreased 7.6% to $600.6 million, 

as compared to $649.7 million for the year ended March 
31, 2012, driven by a $53.8 million decrease due to a 
reduction in average AUM in certain products for which 
we pay fees to third-party distributors. 

Communications and Technology
For the year ended March 31, 2014, communications and 
technology expense increased 5.5% to $157.9 million, as 
compared to $149.7 million for the year ended March 31, 
2013, primarily as a result of an increase in technology 
consulting, market data, and telephone expenses.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, communications 
and technology expense decreased 9.1% to $149.7 
million, as compared to $164.7 million for the year ended 
March 31, 2012, driven by the impact of $8.4 million in 
transition-related costs recognized in fiscal 2012, as well 
as $4.4 million in cost savings as a result of our business 
streamlining initiative.

Occupancy
For the year ended March 31, 2014, occupancy expense 
decreased 33.0% to $115.2 million, as compared to 
$171.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily 
due to the impact of real estate related charges totaling 
$52.8 million recognized in fiscal 2013 and a $4.6 million 
decrease in rent expense, primarily as a result of lease 
reserves taken on vacant space in fiscal 2013. These 
decreases were offset in part by $7.9 million in real estate 
related charges taken during fiscal 2014 in connection with 
the previously discussed corporate initiatives.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, occupancy expense 
increased 11.0% to $171.9 million, as compared to $154.8 
million for the year ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to 
real estate related charges totaling $52.8 million, recorded 
during fiscal 2013 related to further space consolidation 
which resulted in savings of approximately $10.0 million 
per year beginning in fiscal 2014. This increase was offset 
in part by the impact of $11.9 million of lease reserves 
recorded in fiscal 2012, as well as the acceleration of 
$10.3 million of depreciation in fiscal 2012, both primarily 
related to certain office space permanently vacated as a 
part of our business streamlining initiative. The increase 
was also offset in part by $6.0 million in cost savings, also 
as a result of our business streamlining initiative.

Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets
For the year ended March 31, 2014, amortization of 
intangible assets decreased 12.1% to $12.3 million, as 
compared to $14.0 million for the year ended March 31, 
2013, primarily due to certain management contracts 
becoming fully amortized in December 2013.

32

Legg MasonFor the year ended March 31, 2013, amortization of 
intangible assets decreased 28.6% to $14.0 million, as 
compared to $19.6 million for the year ended March 31, 
2012, primarily due to certain management contracts 
becoming fully amortized during fiscal 2012.

Impairment of intangible assets was $734.0 million 
in the year ended March 31, 2013. The impairment 
charges related to our domestic mutual fund contracts 
asset, Permal funds-of-hedge fund contracts asset, and 
Permal trade name. The impairment charges resulted 
from a number of trends and factors, which resulted in 
a reduction of the projected cash flows and our overall 
assessment of fair value of the assets, such that the 
domestic mutual fund contracts asset, Permal funds-
of-hedge funds contracts asset, and Permal trade 
name asset, declined below their carrying values, and 
accordingly were impaired by $396.0 million, $321.0 
million, and $17.0 million, respectively in fiscal 2013. See 
Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for 
further discussion of the impairment charges.

Other
For the year ended March 31, 2014, other expenses 
increased $7.6 million, or 4.0%, to $196.0 million, as 

compared to $188.4 million for the year ended March 31, 
2013, primarily due to a $14.7 million increase in expense 
reimbursements paid to certain mutual funds and a $5.0 
million charge for a fair value adjustment to increase the 
contingent consideration liability related to the acquisition 
of Fauchier, as the acquired business has performed 
better than initially projected. These increases were offset 
in part by an $8.0 million decrease in franchise taxes, as 
well as a $5.3 million decrease in professional fees.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, other expenses 
decreased $2.3 million, or 1.2%, to $188.4 million, as 
compared to $190.7 million for the year ended March 
31, 2012, primarily due to a $4.1 million reduction in 
charges for trading errors. A $2.5 million decrease in 
expense reimbursements paid to certain mutual funds, 
and the impact of $1.7 million of transition-related costs 
recognized in fiscal 2012, also contributed to the decrease. 
These decreases were offset in part by a $5.0 million 
increase in litigation-related expenses as a result of certain 
resolved regulatory investigations. A $1.8 million increase 
in professional fees, primarily related to initiatives with 
Permal, including the acquisition of Fauchier during fiscal 
2013, also offset the decrease.

Non-Operating Income (Expense)
The components of total other non-operating income (expense) (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes 
between periods were as follows:

Years Ended March 31,

2014 Compared to 2013

2013 Compared to 2012

Interest income

Interest expense

Other income (expense), net

Other non-operating income (loss) 

of consolidated investment 
vehicles, net

2014

$   6.4

(52.9)

32.8

2.4

Total other non-operating expense

$(11.3)

2013

$    7.6

(62.9)

(18.0)

2012

$   11.5

(87.6)

22.1

(2.8)

$(76.1)

18.3

$(35.7)

$ Change % Change

$ Change % Change

$ (1.2)

10.0

50.8

5.2

$64.8

(15.8)%

$  (3.9)

(33.9)%

(15.9)

n/m

24.7

(40.1)

(28.2)

n/m

n/m

(85.2)%

(21.1)

$(40.4)

n/m

n/m

n/m—not meaningful

Interest Income
For the year ended March 31, 2014, interest income 
decreased 15.8% to $6.4 million, as compared to $7.6 million 
for the year ended March 31, 2013, driven by the impact of 
lower average interest-bearing investment balances.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, interest income 
decreased 33.9% to $7.6 million, as compared to  
$11.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, driven 
by a $2.6 million decrease due to lower yields earned on 

investment balances and a $1.8 million decrease due to 
lower average investment balances.

Interest Expense
For the year ended March 31, 2014, interest expense 
decreased 15.9% to $52.9 million, as compared to  
$62.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily 
as a result of a $5.6 million decrease in the interest 
accruals for uncertain tax positions and a $4.4 million 
decrease due to the refinancing of the 2.5% Convertible 

33

Legg MasonSenior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) in May 2012 and 
the five-year term loan in January 2014.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, interest expense 
decreased 28.2% to $62.9 million, as compared to  
$87.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, primarily 
as a result of the refinancing of the Convertible Notes in 
May 2012.

Other Income (Expense), Net
For the year ended March 31, 2014, other income (expense), 
net, improved $50.8 million, to income of $32.8 million, from 
an expense of $18.0 million in fiscal 2013. This increase 
was primarily a result of the impact of a $69.0 million loss 
on debt extinguishment recognized in connection with the 
repurchase of the Convertible Notes in May 2012, offset 
in part by a $19.5 million decrease in net market gains on 
seed capital investments and assets invested for deferred 
compensation plans, which are offset by corresponding 
decreases in compensation discussed above.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, other income 
(expense), net, decreased $40.1 million, to an expense of 
$18.0 million, from income of $22.1 million in fiscal 2012. 
This decrease was primarily a result of the $69.0 million 
loss on debt extinguishment recognized in connection 
with the repurchase of the Convertible Notes in May 2012. 
The impact of an $8.6 million gain related to an assigned 
bankruptcy claim, and a $7.5 million gain on the sale of 
a small affiliate, both recognized in the fiscal 2012, also 
contributed to the decrease. These decreases were offset 
in part by a $22.7 million increase in net market gains on 
seed capital investments and assets invested for deferred 
compensation plans, which are offset by corresponding 
increases in compensation discussed above, as well as 
a $20.8 million increase in net market gains on corporate 
investments in proprietary fund products, which are not 
offset in compensation.

Other Non-Operating Income (Loss) of  
Consolidated Investment Vehicles
For the year ended March 31, 2014, other non-operating 
income (loss) of consolidated investment vehicles 
(“CIVs”), net, improved $5.2 million to income of $2.4 
million, from a loss of $2.8 million in fiscal 2013, primarily 
due to net market gains on investments of certain CIVs.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, other non-operating 
income (expense) of CIVs, net, decreased $21.1 million 
to an expense of $2.8 million, from income of $18.3 
million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to net market losses 
on investments of certain CIVs, as well as the impact 
of market gains recognized in fiscal 2012 related to a 
previously consolidated CIV that was redeemed in that 
fiscal year.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
For the year ended March 31, 2014, the provision for 
income taxes was $137.8 million, compared to an income 
tax benefit of $150.9 million in the year ended March 31, 
2013. The effective tax rate was 32.8% for the year ended 
March 31, 2014, compared to an effective benefit rate of 
29.5% in the year ended March 31, 2013. The change in 
the effective rate was primarily related to a higher relative 
proportion of pre-tax income (loss) in jurisdictions with 
higher tax rates, substantially offset by adjustments to 
deferred tax balances and other reserves. 

In July 2012, the U.K. Finance Act 2012 was enacted, 
which reduced the main U.K. corporate tax rate from 25% 
to 24% effective April 1, 2012 and to 23% effective April 
1, 2013. In July 2013, the Finance Bill 2013 was enacted, 
further reducing the main U.K. corporate tax rate to 21% 
effective April 1, 2014 and to 20% effective April 1, 2015. 
The impact of tax rate changes on certain existing deferred 
tax assets and liabilities resulted in a tax benefit of $19.2 
million and $18.1 million on the revaluation of deferred tax 
assets and liabilities for the years ended March 31, 2014 
and 2013, respectively; and impacted the effective rate by 
4.6 percentage points in the year ended March 31, 2014, 
and 3.5 percentage points in the year ended March 31, 
2013. The impact of CIVs increased the effective rate by 
0.2 percentage points for the year ended March 31, 2014, 
and reduced the effective rate by 0.5 percentage points for 
the year ended March 31, 2013.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, the benefit for income 
taxes was $150.9 million, compared to a provision of 
$72.1 million in the prior year. The effective benefit rate 
was 29.5% for the year ended March 31, 2013, compared 
to an effective tax rate of 23.8% in the year ended 
March 31, 2012. The change in the effective rate was 
primarily related to a lower tax benefit associated with 
the intangible asset impairment charge recorded in fiscal 
2013, due to the lower statutory rates in the jurisdictions 
where certain intangible assets were held, partially offset 
by adjustments to reserves and the impact of certain tax 
planning initiatives recorded in fiscal 2012.

In July 2011, The U.K. Finance Act 2011 was enacted, 
which reduced the main U.K. corporate tax rate from 27% 
to 26% effective April 1, 2011, and from 26% to 25% 
effective April 1, 2012. As discussed above, in July 2012, 
the U.K. Finance Act 2012 was enacted, further reducing 
the main U.K. corporate tax rate to 24% effective April 1, 
2012 and 23% effective April 1, 2013. The impact of the 
tax rate changes on certain existing deferred tax assets 
and liabilities resulted in a tax benefit of $18.1 million and 
$18.3 million for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 
2012, respectively, and impacted the effective rate by 3.5 
percentage points in the year ended March 31, 2013, and 

34

Legg Mason6.0 percentage points in the year ended March 31, 2012. 
The impact of changes in the U.K. tax rate was more 
substantial for the year ended March 31, 2012, due to 
the higher level of pre-tax income in that fiscal year. The 
impact of CIVs reduced the effective rate by 0.5 and 0.8 
percentage points for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 
2012, respectively.

Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information
As supplemental information, we are providing performance 
measures that are based on methodologies other than 
generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”) for 
“Adjusted Income” and “Operating Margin, As Adjusted” 
that management uses as benchmarks in evaluating and 
comparing our period-to-period operating performance.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 
and Operating Margin
Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. for the year 
ended March 31, 2014, totaled $284.8 million, or $2.33 
per diluted share, compared to Net Loss Attributable to 
Legg Mason, Inc. of $353.3 million, or $2.65 per diluted 
share, in the year ended March 31, 2013. The increase 
was primarily attributable to the impact of the pre-tax 
impairment charges of $734.0 million ($508.3 million, 
net of income tax benefits, or $3.81 per diluted share), 
recorded in the prior year, the impact of the $69.0 million 
pre-tax loss ($44.8 million, net of income tax benefits, 
or $0.34 per diluted share) on debt extinguishment 
recognized in connection with the repurchase of the 
Convertible Notes in May 2012, the impact of $52.8 million 
of real estate related charges recognized in fiscal 2013, 
and the net impact of increased operating revenues, as 
previously discussed. In addition, Net Income Attributable 
to Legg Mason, Inc. per diluted share benefited from a 
reduction in weighted-average shares outstanding as a 
result of share repurchases. Operating margin was 15.7% 
for the year ended March 31, 2014, compared to (16.6)% 
for the year ended March 31, 2013.

Net Loss Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. for the year 
ended March 31, 2013, totaled $353.3 million, or $2.65 
per diluted share, compared to Net Income Attributable 
to Legg Mason, Inc. of $220.8 million, or $1.54 per 
diluted share, in the year ended March 31, 2012. The 
decrease was primarily attributable to the impact of the 
pre-tax impairment charges of $734.0 million ($508.3 
million, net of income tax benefits, or $3.81 per diluted 
share), recorded in fiscal 2013, related to our indefinite-
life intangible assets, as well as the $69.0 million pre-tax 
loss ($44.8 million, net of income tax benefits, or $0.34 
per diluted share) on debt extinguishment recognized in 
connection with the repurchase of the Convertible Notes 
in May 2012. Real estate related charges of $52.8 million 
recognized in fiscal 2013 also contributed to the decrease. 
These decreases were offset in part by the impact of 
transition-related costs recorded in fiscal 2012, and the 
impact of increased cost savings in fiscal 2013, both in 
connection with our business streamlining initiative. These 
items were previously discussed above. Operating margin 
was (16.6)% for the year ended March 31, 2013, compared 
to 12.7% for the year ended March 31, 2012. 

Adjusted Income increased to $417.8 million, or $3.41 per 
diluted share, for the year ended March 31, 2014, from 
$347.2 million, or $2.61 per diluted share, for the year 
ended March 31, 2013. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, 
for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, was 22.0% 
and 17.5%, respectively. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, 
for the year ended March 31, 2014, was reduced by 1.5 
percentage points due to expenses recognized during the 
fiscal year related to the previously discussed corporate 
initiatives and restructuring charges related to the QS 
Investors acquisition, and by 1.0 percentage point due to 
structuring fees related to a closed-end fund launch during 
the fiscal year. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the year 
ended March 31, 2013, was reduced by 3.5 percentage 
points due to real estate related charges and management 
transition compensation costs recorded during that fiscal 
year, and by 1.0 percentage point due to structuring fees 
related to closed-end fund and real estate investment trust 
launches during that fiscal year. 

Adjusted Income decreased to $347.2 million, or $2.61 
per diluted share, for the year ended March 31, 2013, from 
$397.0 million, or $2.77 per diluted share, for the year 
ended March 31, 2012. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, 
for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, was 16.8% 
and 21.3%, respectively. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, 
for the year ended March 31, 2013 was reduced by 3.5 
percentage points due to real estate related charges and 
management transition compensation costs recorded 
during fiscal 2013. 

Adjusted Income
We define “Adjusted Income” as Net Income (Loss) 
Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., plus amortization 
and deferred taxes related to intangible assets and 
goodwill, imputed interest and tax benefits on contingent 
convertible debt less deferred income taxes on goodwill 
and indefinite-life intangible asset impairment, if any. 
We also adjust for non-core items that are not reflective 
of our economic performance, such as intangible asset 
impairments, the impact of fair value adjustments of 
contingent consideration liabilities, if any, the impact of 
tax rate adjustments on certain deferred tax liabilities 
related to indefinite-life intangible assets, and loss on 
extinguishment of contingent convertible debt.

35

Legg MasonWe believe that Adjusted Income provides a useful 
representation of our operating performance adjusted 
for non-cash acquisition related items and other items 
that facilitate comparison of our results to the results 
of other asset management firms that have not issued/
extinguished contingent convertible debt or made 
significant acquisitions. We also believe that Adjusted 
Income is an important metric in estimating the value of 
an asset management business.

Adjusted Income only considers adjustments for 
certain items that relate to operating performance and 
comparability, and therefore, is most readily reconcilable 
to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 
determined under GAAP. This measure is provided 
in addition to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg 
Mason, Inc., but is not a substitute for Net Income 
(Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. and may not 
be comparable to non-GAAP performance measures, 
including measures of adjusted earnings or adjusted 
income, of other companies. Further, Adjusted Income is 
not a liquidity measure and should not be used in place of 
cash flow measures determined under GAAP. Fair value 
adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities may 
or may not provide a tax benefit, depending on the tax 
attributes of the acquisition transaction. Our current fair 
value adjustment of the contingent consideration liability 
does not provide a current tax benefit. We consider 
Adjusted Income to be useful to investors because it is an 
important metric in measuring the economic performance 
of asset management companies, as an indicator of value, 
and because it facilitates comparison of our operating 
results with the results of other asset management firms 
that have not issued/extinguished contingent convertible 
debt or made significant acquisitions.

In calculating Adjusted Income, we adjust for the impact 
of the amortization of management contract assets 
and impairment of indefinite-life intangible assets, and 
add (subtract) the impact of fair value adjustments on 
contingent consideration liabilities, if any, all of which 
arise from acquisitions, to Net Income (Loss) Attributable 

to Legg Mason, Inc. to reflect the fact that these items 
distort comparisons of our operating results with the 
results of other asset management firms that have not 
engaged in significant acquisitions. Deferred taxes on 
indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill include 
actual tax benefits from amortization deductions that are 
not realized under GAAP absent an impairment charge 
or the disposition of the related business. Because we 
fully expect to realize the economic benefit of the current 
period tax amortization, we add this benefit to Net Income 
(Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. in the calculation 
of Adjusted Income. However, because of our net 
operating loss carry-forward, we will receive the benefit 
of the current tax amortization over time. Conversely, we 
subtract the non-cash income tax benefits on goodwill 
and indefinite-life intangible asset impairment charges and 
U.K. tax rate adjustments on excess book basis on certain 
acquired indefinite-life intangible assets, if applicable, that 
have been recognized under GAAP. We also add back 
non-cash imputed interest and the extinguishment loss on 
contingent convertible debt adjusted for amounts allocated 
to the conversion feature, as well as adding the actual tax 
benefits on the imputed interest that are not realized under 
GAAP. These adjustments reflect that these items distort 
comparisons of our operating results to other periods and 
the results of other asset management firms that have 
not engaged in significant acquisitions, including any 
related impairments, or issued/extinguished contingent 
convertible debt.

Should a disposition, impairment charge or other non-core 
item occur, its impact on Adjusted Income may distort 
actual changes in the operating performance or value of 
our firm. Accordingly, we monitor these items and their 
related impact, including taxes, on Adjusted Income to 
ensure that appropriate adjustments and explanations 
accompany such disclosures.

Although depreciation and amortization of fixed assets 
are non-cash expenses, we do not add these charges in 
calculating Adjusted Income because these charges are 
related to assets that will ultimately require replacement.

36

Legg MasonA reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. to Adjusted Income (in thousands except per share 
amounts) is as follows:

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

Plus (less):

Amortization of intangible assets

Loss on extinguishment of 2.5% senior notes

Impairment of intangible assets

Contingent consideration fair value adjustment

Deferred income taxes on intangible assets:

Impairment charges

Tax amortization benefit

U.K. tax rate adjustment

Imputed interest on convertible debt (2.5% senior notes)

Adjusted Income

Net Income (Loss) per diluted share Attributable to  
  Legg Mason, Inc. common shareholders

Plus (less):

Amortization of intangible assets

Loss on extinguishment of 2.5% senior notes

Impairment of intangible assets

Contingent consideration fair value adjustment

Deferred income taxes on intangible assets:

Impairment charges

Tax amortization benefit

U.K. tax rate adjustment

Imputed interest on convertible debt (2.5% senior notes)

For the Years Ended March 31,

2014

$284,784

2013

2012

$(353,327)

$220,817

12,314

—

—

5,000

—

134,871

(19,164)

—

14,019

54,873

734,000

—

(225,748)

135,588

(18,075)

5,839

19,574

—

—

—

—

135,830

(18,268)

39,077

$417,805

$   347,169

$397,030

$      2.33

$       (2.65)

$      1.54

0.10

—

—

0.04

—

1.10

(0.16)

—

0.11

0.41

5.51

—

(1.69)

1.02

(0.14)

0.04

0.14

—

—

—

—

0.95

(0.13)

0.27

Adjusted Income per diluted share

$       3.41

$        2.61

$       2.77

Operating Margin, as Adjusted
We calculate “Operating Margin, as Adjusted,” by dividing 
(i) Operating Income (Loss), adjusted to exclude the 
impact on compensation expense of gains or losses on 
investments made to fund deferred compensation plans, 
the impact on compensation expense of gains or losses on 
seed capital investments by our affiliates under revenue 
sharing agreements, amortization related to intangible 
assets, transition-related costs of streamlining our 
business model, if any, income (loss) of CIVs, the impact 
of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration 
liabilities, if any, and impairment charges by (ii) our 
operating revenues, adjusted to add back net investment 
advisory fees eliminated upon consolidation of investment 
vehicles, less distribution and servicing expenses which 
we use as an approximate measure of revenues that are 
passed through to third parties, which we refer to as 
“Operating Revenues, as Adjusted.” The compensation 
items, other than transition-related costs, are removed 

from Operating Income (Loss) in the calculation because 
they are offset by an equal amount in Other non-operating 
income (expense), and thus have no impact on Net 
Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. We 
adjust for the impact of amortization of management 
contract assets and the impact of fair value adjustments 
of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, which arise 
from acquisitions to reflect the fact that these items 
distort comparison of our operating results with results 
of other asset management firms that have not engaged 
in significant acquisitions. Transition-related costs, if 
any, impairment charges and income (loss) of CIVs are 
removed from Operating Income (Loss) in the calculation 
because these items are not reflective of our core asset 
management operations. We use Operating Revenues, 
as Adjusted in the calculation to show the operating 
margin without distribution and servicing expenses, 
which we use to approximate our distribution revenues 
that are passed through to third parties as a direct cost of 

37

Legg Masonselling our products, although distribution and servicing 
expenses may include commissions paid in connection 
with the launching of closed-end funds for which there 
is no corresponding revenue in the period. Operating 
Revenues, as Adjusted, also include our advisory revenues 
we receive from CIVs that are eliminated in consolidation 
under GAAP.

We believe that Operating Margin, as Adjusted, is a 
useful measure of our performance because it provides a 
measure of our core business activities. It excludes items 
that have no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to 
Legg Mason, Inc. and indicates what our operating margin 
would have been without the distribution revenues that are 
passed through to third parties as a direct cost of selling our 
products, amortization related to intangible assets, changes 
in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, 

transition-related costs, if any, and impairment charges, and 
the impact of the consolidation of certain investment 
vehicles described above. The consolidation of these 
investment vehicles does not have an impact on Net 
Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. This 
measure is provided in addition to our operating margin 
calculated under GAAP, but is not a substitute for 
calculations of margins under GAAP and may not be 
comparable to non-GAAP performance measures, including 
measures of adjusted margins of other companies.

Effective April 1, 2013, we revised our definition 
of Operating Margin, as Adjusted, to add back the 
amortization of intangible assets. We have applied this 
change to all periods presented. The impact on results for 
the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were increases 
of 0.7 and 1.0 percentage points, respectively.

The calculation of Operating Margin and Operating Margin, as Adjusted, is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Operating Revenues, GAAP basis

Plus (less):

For the Years Ended March 31,

2014

2013

2012

$2,741,757

$2,612,650

$2,662,574

Operating revenues eliminated upon consolidation of investment vehicles

1,950

2,397

3,094

Distribution and servicing expense excluding consolidated investment vehicles

(619,022)

(600,582)

(649,679)

Operating Revenues, as Adjusted

Operating Income (Loss), GAAP basis

Plus (less):

Gains (losses) on deferred compensation and seed investments

Transition-related costs

Impairment of intangible assets

Contingent consideration fair value adjustment

Amortization of intangible assets

Operating income and expenses of consolidated investment vehicles

Operating Income, as Adjusted

Operating Margin, GAAP basis

Operating Margin, as Adjusted

$2,124,685

$2,014,465

$2,015,989

$   430,893

$  (434,499)

$   338,753

16,987

—

—

5,000

12,314

2,370

36,497

—

734,000

—

14,019

2,959

13,809

73,066

—

—

19,574

3,702

$    467,564

$    352,976

$   448,904

15.7%

22.0

(16.6)%

17.5

12.7%

22.3

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The primary objective of our capital structure is to 
appropriately support our business strategies and to 
provide needed liquidity at all times, including maintaining 
required capital in certain subsidiaries. Liquidity and the 
access to liquidity is important to the success of our 
ongoing operations. Our overall funding needs and capital 
base are continually reviewed to determine if the capital 
base meets the expected needs of our businesses. 
We intend to continue to explore potential acquisition 
opportunities as a means of diversifying and strengthening 
our asset management business. These opportunities may 

from time to time involve acquisitions that are material in 
size and may require, among other things, and subject to 
existing covenants, the raising of additional equity capital 
and/or the issuance of additional debt.

The consolidation of variable interest entities discussed 
above does not impact our liquidity and capital resources. 
We have no rights to the benefits from, nor do we bear 
the risks associated with, the assets and liabilities of the 
CIVs beyond our investments in and investment advisory 
fees generated from these vehicles, which are eliminated 
in consolidation. Additionally, creditors of the CIVs have 

38

Legg Masonno recourse to our general credit beyond the level of our 
investment, if any, so we do not consider these liabilities 
to be our obligations.

Our assets consist primarily of intangible assets, goodwill, 
cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and 
investment advisory and related fee receivables. Our 
assets have been principally funded by equity capital, 
long-term debt and the results of our operations. At March 
31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents, total assets, long-
term debt and stockholders’ equity were $0.9 billion, 

$7.1 billion, $1.0 billion and $4.7 billion, respectively. Total 
assets include amounts related to CIVs of $0.2 billion.

Cash and cash equivalents are primarily invested in liquid 
domestic and non-domestic money market funds that 
hold principally domestic and non-domestic corporate 
commercial paper and bonds, government and agency 
securities, and bank deposits. We have not recognized any 
losses on these investments. Our monitoring of cash and 
cash equivalents mitigates the potential that material risks 
may be associated with these balances.

The following table summarizes our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31 (in millions):

Cash flows provided by operating activities

Cash flows provided by/(used in) investing activities

Cash flows used in financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

2014

$  437.3

137.6

(639.0)

(10.9)

(75.0)

933.0

$  858.0

2013

$   303.3

(11.0)

(735.9)

(5.7)

(449.3)

1,382.3

$   933.0

2012

$   496.8

2.3

(481.8)

(10.9)

6.4

1,375.9

$1,382.3

Cash inflows provided by operating activities during fiscal 
2014 were $437.3 million, primarily related to Net Income, 
adjusted for non-cash items, offset in part by net sales 
(purchases) of trading and other current investments 
and a decrease in net activity related to CIVs, primarily 
due to the wind-down of the CLO. See Note 17 of Notes 
to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional 
information regarding the CLO. Cash inflows provided by 
operating activities during fiscal 2013 were $303.3 million, 
primarily related to net sales of trading and other current 
investments and results of operations, adjusted for non-
cash items, offset in part by the allocation of extinguished 
debt repayment and payments for accrued compensation. 
Cash inflows provided by operating activities during fiscal 
2012 were $496.8 million, primarily related to Net Income, 
adjusted for non-cash items. 

Cash inflows provided by investing activities during fiscal 
2014, were $137.6 million, primarily related to net activity 
related to CIVs, offset in part by payments for fixed assets. 
Cash outflows used in investing activities during fiscal 
2013, were $11.0 million, primarily related to payments 
related to the acquisition of Fauchier and payments made 
for fixed assets, offset in part by net activity related to 
CIVs. Cash inflows provided by investing activities during 

fiscal 2012, were $2.3 million, primarily related to $20.2 
million of net activity related to CIVs and a release of 
restricted cash required for market hedge arrangements, 
offset in part by payments made for fixed assets. 

Cash outflows used in financing activities during fiscal 
2014 were $639.0 million, primarily related to the 
repayment of long-term debt of $500.4 million, the 
repayment of long-term debt of CIVs of $133.0 million, 
the repurchase of 9.7 million shares of our common 
stock for $360.0 million, and dividends paid of $62.0 
million, offset in part by the proceeds from the long-term 
debt issuances of $393.7 million. Cash outflows used in 
financing activities during fiscal 2013 were $735.9 million, 
primarily related to the repayment of long-term debt of 
$1,049.2 million, the repurchase of 16.2 million shares of 
our common stock for $425.5 million, the $250.0 million 
repayment of short-term debt, and dividends paid of $55.3 
million, offset in part by the proceeds from the subsequent 
long-term debt issuances of $1,143.2 million. Cash 
outflows used in financing activities during fiscal 2012, 
were $481.8 million, primarily due to the repurchase of 
13.6 million shares of our common stock for $401.8 million 
and dividends paid of $43.6 million.

39

Legg MasonFinancing Transactions
The table below reflects our primary sources of financing (in thousands) as of March 31, 2014:

Type

5.5% senior notes

5.625% senior notes

Total at
March 31, 
2014

Amount Outstanding at
March 31,

2014

2013

Interest Rate

$650,000

$650,000

$650,000

5.50%

400,000

400,000

N/A

5.625%

Maturity

May 2019

January 2044

Revolving credit agreements

Five-year amortizing term loan

750,000

—

—

—

LIBOR + 1.5% + 0.20% 
annual commitment fee June 2017

—

500,000

LIBOR + 1.5%

Repaid January 2014

Capital Plan and Other Financing Transactions
In May 2012, we announced a capital plan that included 
refinancing the Convertible Notes. The refinancing was 
effected through the issuance of $650 million of 5.5% 
senior notes, the net proceeds of which, together with 
cash on hand and $250 million of remaining borrowing 
capacity under a then existing revolving credit facility, 
were used to repurchase all $1.25 billion of the Convertible 
Notes. The terms of the repurchase included the 
repayment of the Convertible Notes at par plus accrued 
interest, a prepayment fee of $6.3 million, and the 
issuance of warrants to the holders of the Convertible 
Notes. The warrants replace a conversion feature of the 
Convertible Notes, and provide for the purchase, in the 
aggregate and subject to adjustment, of 14.2 million 
shares of our common stock, on a net share settled basis, 
at an exercise price of $88 per share. The warrants expire 
in July 2017 and can be settled, at our election, in either 
shares of common stock or cash.

The $650 million 5.5% senior notes are due May 2019 
and were sold at a discount of $6.8 million, which is being 
amortized to interest expense over the seven-year term.

Also, pursuant to the capital plan, in June 2012, we 
entered into an unsecured credit agreement which 
provides for a $500 million revolving credit facility and a 
$500 million term loan, which was repaid in fiscal 2014, 
as further discussed below. The proceeds of the term 
loan were used to repay the $500 million of outstanding 
borrowings under the previous revolving credit facility, 
which was then terminated.

In January 2014, we issued $400 million of 5.625% senior 
notes, the net proceeds of which, together with cash on 
hand, were used to repay the $450 million of outstanding 
borrowings under the five-year term loan entered into in 
conjunction with the unsecured credit agreement noted 
above. The 5.625% senior notes are due January 2044 
and were sold at a discount of $6.3 million, which is being 
amortized to interest expense over the 30 year term.

In January 2014, we entered into a $250 million 
incremental revolving credit facility, which was 
contemplated in, and is in addition to the $500 million 
revolving credit facility available under, the existing credit 
agreement. These revolving credit facilities are available 
to fund working capital needs and for general corporate 
purposes and expire in June 2017. There were no 
borrowings outstanding under either of our revolving  
credit facilities as of March 31, 2014.

In connection with the extinguishment of the Convertible 
Notes, hedge transactions (purchased call options and 
warrants) executed in connection with the initial issuance 
of the Convertible Notes were also terminated.

The financial covenants under our bank agreements 
include: maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.5 to 1 
and minimum EBITDA to interest expense ratio of 4.0 to 
1. Debt is defined to include all obligations for borrowed 
money, excluding non-recourse debt of CIVs, and capital 
leases. Under these net debt covenants, our debt is 
reduced by the amount of our unrestricted cash in excess 
of the greater of subsidiary cash or $375 million. EBITDA 
is defined as consolidated net income (loss) plus/minus 
tax expense (benefit), interest expense, depreciation and 
amortization, amortization of intangibles, any extraordinary 
expense or losses, and any non-cash charges, as defined 
in the agreements. As of March 31, 2014, our net debt to 
EBITDA ratio was 1.2 to 1 and EBITDA to interest expense 
ratio was 12.5 to 1, and, therefore, we have maintained 
compliance with the applicable covenants. In addition, 
the 5.5% senior notes are subject to certain nonfinancial 
covenants, including provisions relating to dispositions of 
certain assets, which could require a percentage of any 
related proceeds to be applied to accelerated repayments.

If our net income (loss) significantly declines, or if we 
spend our available cash, it may impact our ability to 
maintain compliance with the financial covenants. If we 
determine that our compliance with these covenants 
may be under pressure, we may elect to take a number 
of actions, including reducing our expenses in order to 

40

Legg Masonincrease our EBITDA, using available cash to repay all or a 
portion of our outstanding debt subject to these covenants 
or seeking to negotiate with our lenders to modify the 
terms or to restructure our debt. We anticipate that we 
will have available cash to repay our bank debt, should it 
be necessary. Using available cash to repay indebtedness 
would make the cash unavailable for other uses and might 
affect the liquidity discussions and conclusions. Entering 
into any modification or restructuring of our debt would 
likely result in additional fees or interest payments.

Our outstanding bank debt agreement is currently 
impacted by the ratings of two rating agencies. The 
interest rate and annual commitment fee on our revolving 
lines of credit are based on the higher credit rating of the 
two rating agencies. In June 2011, our rating by one of 
these agencies was downgraded one notch below the 
other. Should the other agency downgrade our rating, 
absent an upgrade from the former agency, our interest 
costs will rise modestly. In addition, under the terms of 
the 5.5% senior notes, the interest rate paid on these 
notes will increase modestly if our credit ratings are 
reduced below investment grade.

Also in connection with the capital plan, our board of 
directors authorized $1.0 billion for additional purchases 
of our common stock, $370 million of which remained 
available as of March 31, 2014. The capital plan authorizes 
using up to 65% of cash generated from future operations 
to purchase shares of our common stock.

Other Transactions
In March 2013, we completed the acquisition of all of the 
outstanding share capital of Fauchier, a leading European 
based manager of funds-of-hedge funds, from BNP Paribas 
Investment Partners, S.A. The transaction included an 
initial cash payment of $63.4 million, which was funded 
from existing cash resources. In addition, contingent 
consideration of up to approximately $25 million and 
approximately $33 million (using the exchange rate between 
the British pound and U.S. dollar as of March 31, 2014), may 
be due on or about the second and fourth anniversaries 
of closing, respectively, dependent on achieving certain 
levels of revenue, net of distribution costs, and subject to 
a potential catch-up adjustment in the fourth anniversary 
payment for any second anniversary payment shortfall. 
The fair value of the contingent consideration liability was 
approximately $29.6 million as of March 31, 2014, an 
increase of $7.7 million from March 31, 2013, with $5.0 
million attributable to revised estimates of amounts payable 
and $2.7 million attributable to changes in the exchange 
rate and interest amortization. We have executed currency 
forwards to economically hedge the risk of movements in 
the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British 

pound in which the estimated contingent liability payment 
amounts are denominated.

In March 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire 
QS Investors, a leading customized solutions and global 
quantitative equities provider, for an initial purchase 
price of $11 million and contingent consideration of up to 
$10 million and $20 million due on or about the second 
and fourth anniversaries of the closing, respectively, 
dependent on the achievement of certain net revenue 
targets, and subject to a potential catch-up adjustment in 
the fourth anniversary payment for any second anniversary 
payment shortfall. This acquisition is expected to close in 
the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

Certain of our asset management affiliates maintain 
various credit facilities for general operating purposes. 
Certain affiliates are also subject to the capital 
requirements of various regulatory agencies. All 
such affiliates met their respective capital adequacy 
requirements during the periods presented.

See Notes 2 and 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial 
Statements for additional information related to the 
acquisitions of Fauchier and QS Investors and our capital 
plan, respectively.

Future Outlook
We expect that over the next 12 months cash generated 
from our operating activities will be adequate to support 
our operating and investing liquidity needs, and planned 
share repurchases. We currently intend to utilize our other 
available resources for any number of potential activities, 
including, but not limited to, acquisitions, seed capital 
investments in new products, repurchase of shares of 
our common stock, repayment of outstanding debt, or 
payment of increased dividends.

In June 2013 and March 2014, we implemented 
management equity plans that will entitle certain key 
employees of Permal and ClearBridge, respectively, to 
participate in 15% of the future growth of the respective 
enterprise value (subject to appropriate discounts), if any, as 
further discussed in Notes 1 and 11 of Notes to Consolidated 
Financial Statements. Repurchases of units granted under 
the plans may impact future liquidity requirements.

In connection with the planned integration over time of 
two existing affiliates, Batterymarch and LMGAA, with 
QS Investors after the acquisition closes, we expect to 
incur restructuring and transition costs of approximately 
$35 million, of which approximately 25% are non-cash 
charges. Approximately $2.5 million of these charges were 
accrued as of March 31, 2014. A significant portion of 

41

Legg Masonthese costs will be paid in the year ending March 31, 2015. 
See Note 2 for additional information.

As described above, we currently project that our cash 
flows from operating activities will be sufficient to fund 
our liquidity needs. As of March 31, 2014, we had over 
$500 million in cash and cash equivalents in excess of our 
working capital requirements. As previously discussed, 
and in accordance with our capital plan, we intend to utilize 
up to 65% of cash generated from future operations to 
purchase shares of our common stock in the year ending 
March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2014, we also had 
undrawn revolving credit facilities totaling $750 million, 
expiring June 2017. We do not currently expect to raise 
incremental debt or equity financing over the next 12 
months beyond our current levels. However, there can be 
no assurances of these expectations as our projections 
could prove to be incorrect, events may occur that require 
additional liquidity, such as an acquisition opportunity 
or an opportunity to refinance indebtedness, or market 
conditions might significantly worsen, affecting our results 
of operations and generation of available cash. If these 
events result in our operations and available cash being 
insufficient to fund liquidity needs, we would likely seek to 
manage our available resources by taking actions such as 
reducing future share repurchases, cost-cutting, reducing 
our expected expenditures on investments, selling assets 
(such as investment securities), repatriating earnings from 
foreign subsidiaries, reducing our dividend, or modifying 
arrangements with our affiliates and/or employees. Should 
these types of actions prove insufficient, or should a large 
acquisition or refinancing opportunity arise, we may seek 
to raise additional equity or debt.

At March 31, 2014, our total cash and cash equivalents 
of $858 million included $306 million held by foreign 
subsidiaries. During fiscal 2014, in order to increase our 
cash available in the U.S. for general corporate purposes, 
we implemented plans developed in prior years to 
repatriate accumulated foreign earnings for which deferred 
taxes had been previously accrued, and repatriated $301 
million. We plan to repatriate an additional $245 million 
of foreign cash over the next several years. Due to 
certain tax planning strategies, we anticipate that we will 
generate a tax benefit of approximately $12 million with 
respect to future repatriation of accumulated earnings. 

We have adjusted the tax reserve accordingly. No further 
repatriation of accumulated prior period foreign earnings 
is currently planned. However, if circumstances change, 
we will provide for and pay any applicable additional U.S. 
taxes in connection with repatriation of offshore funds. It 
is not practical at this time to determine the income tax 
liability that would result from any further repatriation of 
accumulated foreign earnings.

Credit and Liquidity Risk
Cash and cash equivalent deposits involve certain 
credit and liquidity risks. We maintain our cash and 
cash equivalents with a number of high quality financial 
institutions or funds and from time to time may have 
concentrations with one or more of these institutions. The 
balances with these financial institutions or funds and their 
credit quality are monitored on an ongoing basis.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined by 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), 
include certain contractual arrangements pursuant to 
which a company has an obligation, such as certain 
contingent obligations, certain guarantee contracts, 
retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to 
an unconsolidated entity, certain derivative instruments 
classified as equity or material variable interests in 
unconsolidated entities that provide financing, liquidity, 
market risk or credit risk support. Disclosure is required 
for any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are 
reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect 
on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity 
or capital resources. We generally do not enter into off-
balance sheet arrangements, as defined, other than those 
described in the Contractual Obligations section that 
follows and Consolidation discussed in Critical Accounting 
Policies and Notes 1 and 17 of Notes to Consolidated 
Financial Statements.

CONTRACTUAL AND CONTINGENT OBLIGATIONS
We have contractual obligations to make future payments, 
principally in connection with our long-term debt, non-
cancelable lease agreements, acquisition agreements 
and service agreements. See Notes 6 and 8 of Notes 
to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional 
disclosures related to our commitments.

42

Legg MasonThe following table sets forth these contractual obligations (in millions) by fiscal year, and excludes contractual obligations 
of CIVs, as we are not responsible or liable for these obligations:

Contractual Obligations
Long-term borrowings by contract maturity(1)
Interest on long-term borrowings and credit facility commitment fees(1)

Minimum rental and service commitments

Total Contractual Obligations

Contingent Obligation
Payments related to business acquisition(2)
Total Contractual and Contingent Obligations(3)(4)(5)(6)

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Thereafter

Total

$    0.4

$      — $     — $     — $     — $1,050.0 $1,050.4

59.8

134.3

194.5

59.8

115.7

175.5

59.8

97.6

58.7

87.1

58.3

72.9

580.4

351.2

876.8

858.8

157.4

145.8

131.2

1,981.6

2,786.0

—

25.0

10.0

33.0

20.0

—

88.0

$194.5

$200.5 $167.4

$178.8

$151.2

$1,981.6 $2,874.0

(1)  Excludes current portion of long-term borrowings of the consolidated CLO of $79.2 million and interest on these borrowings, as applicable. 
(2)  The amount of contingent payments reflected for any year represents the maximum amount that could be payable, using the exchange rate between the 
British pound and U.S. dollar as of March 31, 2014, for the amounts due in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2018, at the earliest possible date under the terms of the 
business purchase agreements. The contingent obligation had a fair value of $29.6 million as of March 31, 2014.

(3)  The table above does not include approximately $34.5 million in capital commitments to investment partnerships in which Legg Mason is a limited partner. 

These obligations will be funded, as required, through the end of the commitment periods running through fiscal 2021.

(4)  The table above does not include amounts for uncertain tax positions of $55.7 million (net of the federal benefit for state tax liabilities), because the timing 

of any related cash outflows cannot be reliably estimated.

(5)  The table above does not include redeemable noncontrolling interests, primarily related to CIVs, of $45.1 million, because the timing of any related cash 

outflows cannot be reliably estimated.

(6)  The table above excludes potential obligations arising from the ultimate settlement of awards under the management equity plans with key employees 
of Permal and ClearBridge due to the uncertainty of the timing and amounts ultimately payable. See Notes 1 and 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial 
Statements for additional information regarding management equity plans.

MARKET RISK
We maintain an enterprise risk management program 
to oversee and coordinate risk management activities 
of Legg Mason and its subsidiaries. Under the program, 
certain risk activities are managed at the subsidiary level. 
The following describes certain aspects of our business 
that are sensitive to market risk.

Revenues and Net Income (Loss)
The majority of our revenue is calculated from the market 
value of our AUM. Accordingly, a decline in the value 
of the underlying securities will cause our AUM, and 
thus our revenues, to decrease. In addition, our fixed 
income and liquidity AUM are subject to the impact of 
interest rate fluctuations, as rising interest rates may 
tend to reduce the market value of bonds held in various 
mutual fund portfolios or separately managed accounts. 
In the ordinary course of our business, we may also 
reduce or waive investment management fees, or limit 
total expenses, on certain products or services for 
particular time periods to manage fund expenses, or for 
other reasons, and to help retain or increase managed 
assets. Performance fees may be earned on certain 

investment advisory contracts for exceeding performance 
benchmarks, and strong markets tend to increase these 
fees. Declines in market values of AUM will result in 
reduced fee revenues and net income. We generally earn 
higher fees on equity assets than fees charged for fixed 
income and liquidity assets. Declines in market values of 
AUM in this asset class will disproportionately impact our 
revenues. In addition, under revenue sharing agreements, 
certain of our affiliates retain different percentages of 
revenues to cover their costs, including compensation. 
Our net income (loss), profit margin and compensation as 
a percentage of operating revenues are impacted based 
on which affiliates generate our revenues, and a change 
in AUM at one subsidiary can have a dramatically different 
effect on our revenues and earnings than an equal change 
at another subsidiary.

Trading and Non-Trading Assets
Our trading and non-trading assets are comprised of 
investment securities, including seed capital in sponsored 
mutual funds and products, limited partnerships, limited 
liability companies and certain other investment products.

43

Legg MasonTrading and other current investments, excluding CIVs, at March 31, 2014 and 2013, subject to risk of security price 
fluctuations are summarized below (in thousands).

Investment securities, excluding CIVs:

Trading investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans

Trading proprietary fund products and other investments

Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans,  

proprietary fund products and other investments

Total current investments, excluding CIVs

2014

2013

$109,648

335,456

22,622

$467,726

$  86,583

228,156

56,341

$371,080

Approximately $33.7 million and $39.2 million of trading 
and other current investments related to long-term 
incentive compensation plans as of March 31, 2014 and 
2013, respectively, have offsetting liabilities such that 
fluctuation in the market value of these assets and the 
related liabilities will not have a material effect on our net 
income (loss) or liquidity. However, it will have an impact 
on our compensation expense with a corresponding 
offset in other non-operating income (expense). Trading 
and other current investments of $90.0 million and $91.1 
million at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, relate 
to other long-term incentive plans for which the related 
liabilities do not completely offset due to vesting provisions. 
Therefore, fluctuations in the market value of these trading 
investments will impact our compensation expense, non-
operating income (expense) and net income (loss).

Approximately $344.0 million and $240.8 million of trading 
and other current investments at March 31, 2014 and 
2013, respectively, are investments in proprietary fund 
products and other investments for which fluctuations 
in market value will impact our non-operating income 
(expense). Of these amounts, the fluctuations in market 
value related to approximately $19.9 million and $13.8 
million of proprietary fund products as of March 31, 2014 
and 2013, respectively, have offsetting compensation 
expense under revenue share agreements. The fluctuations 
in market value related to approximately $109.8 million 
and $71.9 million in proprietary fund products as of March 
31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are substantially offset 
by gains (losses) on market hedges and therefore do not 
materially impact Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg 
Mason, Inc. Investments in proprietary fund products are 
not liquidated before the related fund establishes a track 
record, has other investors, or a decision is made to no 
longer pursue the strategy.

Non-trading assets, excluding CIVs, at March 31, 2014 and 2013, subject to risk of security price fluctuations are 
summarized below (in thousands).

Investment securities, excluding CIVs:

Available-for-sale

Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other

Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs

Other investments

Total non-trading assets, excluding CIVs

2014

2013

$ 12,072

    24,464

    62,973

            90

$99,599

$  12,400

    31,143

  68,780

            99

$112,422

Investment securities of CIVs totaled $50.5 million and 
$24.8 million as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, 
and investments of CIVs totaled $31.8 million and $210.6 
million as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of 
March 31, 2014 and 2013, we held equity investments in 
the CIVs of $39.4 million and $39.1 million, respectively. 
Fluctuations in the market value of investments of CIVs 
in excess of our equity investment will not impact Net 
Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. However, 

it may have an impact on other non-operating income 
(expense) of CIVs with a corresponding offset in Net 
income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests.

Valuation of trading and non-trading investments is 
described below within Critical Accounting Policies 
under the heading “Valuation of Financial Instruments.” 
See Notes 1 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial 
Statements for further discussion of derivatives.

44

Legg MasonThe following is a summary of the effect of a 10% increase or decrease in the market values of our financial instruments 
subject to market valuation risks at March 31, 2014 (in thousands):

Investment securities, excluding CIVs:

Trading investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans

Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other trading investments

Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans, 

$109,648

335,456

$120,613

369,002

$  98,683

301,910

Carrying Value

Fair Value 
Assuming a  
10% Increase(1)

Fair Value 
Assuming a  
10% Decrease(1)

proprietary fund products and other investments

Total current investments, excluding CIVs

Investments in CIVs

Available-for-sale investments

Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other

Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs

Other investments

Total investments subject to market risk

22,622

467,726

39,434

12,072

24,464

62,973

90

24,884

514,499

43,377

13,279

26,910

69,270

99

20,360

420,953

35,491

10,865

22,018

56,676

81

$606,759

$667,434

$546,084

(1)  Gains and losses related to certain investments in deferred compensation plans and proprietary fund products are directly offset by a corresponding adjust-
ment to compensation expense and related liability. In addition, investments in proprietary fund products of approximately $109.8 million have been eco-
nomically hedged to limit market risk. As a result, a 10% increase or decrease in the unrealized market value of our financial instruments subject to market 
valuation risks would result in a $32.8 million increase or decrease in our pre-tax earnings as of March 31, 2014.

Also, as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, cash and cash 
equivalents included $456.6 million and $485.8 million, 
respectively, of money market funds. 

Foreign Exchange Sensitivity
We operate primarily in the U.S., but provide services, earn 
revenues and incur expenses outside the U.S. Accordingly, 
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for currencies, 
principally in the U.K., Brazil, Japan, Canada, Singapore, 
Australia, and those denominated in the euro, may impact 
our comprehensive income (loss) and net income (loss). 
We and certain of our affiliates have entered into forward 
contracts to manage a portion of the impact of fluctuations 
in foreign exchange rates on their results of operations. 
We do not expect foreign currency fluctuations to have a 
material effect on our net income (loss) or liquidity.

Interest Rate Risk
Exposure to interest rate changes on our outstanding 
debt is substantially mitigated as our $650 million of 
5.5% senior notes and $400 million of 5.625% senior 
notes are at fixed interest rates. See Note 6 of Notes 
to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional 
disclosures regarding debt.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Accounting policies are an integral part of the preparation 
of our financial statements in accordance with accounting 
principles generally accepted in the United States of 
America. Understanding these policies, therefore, is a key 
factor in understanding our reported results of operations 

and financial position. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated 
Financial Statements for a discussion of our significant 
accounting policies and other information. Certain critical 
accounting policies require us to make estimates and 
assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, 
revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements. 
Due to their nature, estimates involve judgment based upon 
available information. Therefore, actual results or amounts 
could differ from estimates and the difference could have a 
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

We consider the following to be our critical accounting 
policies that involve significant estimates or judgments.

Consolidation
In the normal course of our business, we sponsor and 
are the manager of various types of investment vehicles. 
For our services, we are entitled to receive management 
fees and may be eligible, under certain circumstances, to 
receive additional subordinate management fees or other 
incentive fees. Our exposure to risk in these entities is 
generally limited to any equity investment we have made 
or are required to make and any earned but uncollected 
management fees. Uncollected management fees from 
managed investment vehicles were not material at 
March 31, 2014, and we have not issued any investment 
performance guarantees to these investment vehicles or 
their investors. In accordance with financial accounting 
standards on consolidation, we consolidate various 
sponsored investment vehicles, some of which are 
separately identified as CIVs.

45

Legg MasonCertain investment vehicles we sponsor and are the 
manager of are considered to be variable interest entities 
(“VIEs”) (further described below) while others are 
considered to be voting rights entities (“VREs”) subject 
to traditional consolidation concepts based on ownership 
rights. Investment vehicles that are considered VREs are 
consolidated if we have a controlling financial interest in 
the investment vehicle, absent substantive investor rights 
to replace the manager of the entity (kick-out rights). We 
may also fund the initial cash investment in certain VRE 
investment vehicles to generate an investment performance 
track record in order to attract third-party investors in the 
product. These “seed capital investments” are consolidated 
as long as Legg Mason maintains a controlling financial 
interest in the product, but they are not included as CIVs. 
We may also hold a longer-term controlling financial interest 
in sponsored investment fund VREs which have third-party 
investors and are consolidated and included as CIVs.

A VIE is an entity which does not have adequate equity 
to finance its activities without additional subordinated 
financial support; or the equity investors, as a group, do 
not have the normal characteristics of equity for a potential 
controlling financial interest.

Investment Company VIEs
For most sponsored investment funds deemed to be 
investment companies, including money market funds, we 
determine if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE if we 
absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, or receive a 
majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, if any. Our 
determination of expected residual returns excludes gross 
fees paid to a decision maker if certain criteria are met. In 
determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of 
an investment company VIE, we consider both qualitative 
and quantitative factors such as the voting rights of the 
equity holders; economic participation of all parties, 
including how fees are earned and paid to us; related party 
(including employees’) ownership; guarantees and implied 
relationships. In determining the primary beneficiary, we 
must make assumptions and estimates about, among other 
things, the future performance of the underlying assets held 
by the VIE, including investment returns, cash flows, and 
credit and interest rate risks. In determining whether a VIE 
is significant for disclosure purposes, we consider the same 
factors used for determination of the primary beneficiary.

Other VIEs
For other sponsored investment funds that do not meet 
the investment company criteria, such as collateralized 
debt obligation entities and CLO entities, if we have a 
significant variable interest, we determine if we are the 
primary beneficiary of the VIE if we have both the power 
to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly 

impact the entity’s economic performance and the 
obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, 
that potentially could be significant to the VIE. We 
determine whether we have a variable interest in a VIE by 
considering if, among other things, we have the obligation 
to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, that are 
expected to be significant to the VIE. We consider the 
management fee structure, including the seniority level of 
our fees, the current and expected economic performance 
of the entity, as well as other provisions included in the 
governing documents that might restrict or guarantee an 
expected loss or residual return.

In evaluating whether we have the obligation to absorb 
losses, or the right to receive benefits, that could 
potentially be significant to the VIE, we consider factors 
regarding the design, terms, and characteristics of the 
investment vehicles, including the following qualitative 
factors: if we have involvement with the investment 
vehicle beyond providing management services; if we 
hold equity or debt interests in the investment vehicle; 
if we have transferred any assets to the investment 
vehicle; if the potential aggregate fees in future periods 
are insignificant relative to the potential cash flows 
of the investment vehicle; and if the variability of the 
expected fees in relation to the potential cash flows of the 
investment vehicle is more than insignificant.

We must consolidate any VIE for which we are deemed to 
be the primary beneficiary.

See Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
for additional discussion of CIVs and other VIEs.

Revenue Recognition
The vast majority of our revenues are calculated as a 
percentage of the fair value of our AUM. The underlying 
securities within the portfolios we manage, which are not 
reflected within our consolidated financial statements, are 
generally valued as follows: (i) with respect to securities 
for which market quotations are readily available, the 
market value of such securities; and (ii) with respect to 
other securities and assets, fair value as determined in 
good faith.

For most of our mutual funds and other pooled products, 
their boards of directors or similar bodies are responsible 
for establishing policies and procedures related to the 
pricing of securities. Each board of directors generally 
delegates the execution of the various functions related 
to pricing to a fund valuation committee which, in turn, 
may rely on information from various parties in pricing 
securities such as independent pricing services, the fund 
accounting agent, the fund manager, broker-dealers, and 
others (or a combination thereof). The funds have controls 

46

Legg Masonreasonably designed to ensure that the prices assigned 
to securities they hold are accurate. Management 
has established policies to ensure consistency in the 
application of revenue recognition.

As manager and advisor for separate accounts, we are 
generally responsible for the pricing of securities held 
in client accounts (or may share this responsibility with 
others) and have established policies to govern valuation 
processes similar to those discussed above for mutual 
funds that are reasonably designed to ensure consistency 
in the application of revenue recognition. Management 
relies extensively on the data provided by independent 
pricing services and the custodians in the pricing of 
separate account AUM. Separate account customers 
typically select the custodian.

Valuation processes for AUM are dependent on the nature 
of the assets and any contractual provisions with our 
clients. Equity securities under management for which 
market quotations are available are usually valued at the 
last reported sales price or official closing price on the 
primary market or exchange on which they trade. Debt 
securities under management are usually valued at bid, or 
the mean between the last quoted bid and asked prices, 
provided by independent pricing services that are based 
on transactions in debt obligations, quotations from bond 
dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and 
various other relationships between securities. Short-
term debt obligations are generally valued at amortized 
cost, which is designed to approximate fair value. The 
vast majority of our AUM is valued based on data from 
third parties such as independent pricing services, fund 
accounting agents, custodians and brokers. This varies 
slightly from time to time based upon the underlying 
composition of the asset class (equity, fixed income 
and liquidity) as well as the actual underlying securities 
in the portfolio within each asset class. Regardless 
of the valuation process or pricing source, we have 
established controls reasonably designed to assess the 
reasonableness of the prices provided. Where market 
prices are not readily available, or are determined not to 
reflect fair value, value may be determined in accordance 
with established valuation procedures based on, among 
other things, unobservable inputs. Management fees 
on AUM where fair values are based on unobservable 
inputs are not material. As of March 31, 2014, equity, 
fixed income and liquidity AUM values aggregated $186.4 
billion, $365.2 billion and $150.2 billion, respectively.

As the vast majority of our AUM is valued by independent 
pricing services based upon observable market prices 
or inputs, we believe market risk is the most significant 
risk underlying the value of our AUM. Economic events 
and financial market turmoil have increased market price 

volatility; however, the valuation of the vast majority of 
the securities held by our funds and in separate accounts 
continues to be derived from readily available market price 
quotations. As of March 31, 2014, less than 1% of total 
AUM is valued based on unobservable inputs.

Valuation of Financial Instruments
Substantially all financial instruments are reflected in 
the financial statements at fair value or amounts that 
approximate fair value, except our long-term debt. Trading 
investments, investment securities and derivative assets 
and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets 
include forms of financial instruments. Unrealized gains 
and losses related to these financial instruments are 
reflected in Net Income (Loss) or Other Comprehensive 
Income (Loss), depending on the underlying purpose of 
the instrument.

For equity investments where we do not control the 
investee, and where we are not the primary beneficiary 
of a variable interest entity, but can exert significant 
influence over the financial and operating policies of the 
investee, we follow the equity method of accounting. 
The evaluation of whether we exert control or significant 
influence over the financial and operational policies of 
an investee requires significant judgment based on the 
facts and circumstances surrounding each individual 
investment. Factors considered in these evaluations may 
include investor voting or other rights, any influence we 
may have on the governing board of the investee, the legal 
rights of other investors in the entity pursuant to the fund’s 
operating documents and the relationship between us and 
other investors in the entity. Substantially all of our equity 
method investees are investment companies which record 
their underlying investments at fair value. Therefore, 
under the equity method of accounting, our share of the 
investee’s underlying net income or loss predominantly 
represents fair value adjustments in the investments 
held by the equity method investee. Our share of the 
investee’s net income or loss is based on the most current 
information available and is recorded as a net gain (loss) on 
investments within non-operating income (expense).

For investments, we value equity and fixed income 
securities using closing market prices for listed 
instruments or broker or dealer price quotations, when 
available. Fixed income securities may also be valued 
using valuation models and estimates based on spreads 
to actively traded benchmark debt instruments with 
readily available market prices. We evaluate our non-
trading investment securities for “other than temporary” 
impairment. Impairment may exist when the fair value of an 
investment security has been below the adjusted cost for 
an extended period of time. If an “other than temporary” 

47

Legg Masonimpairment is determined to exist, the difference between 
the adjusted cost of the investment security and its current 
fair value is recognized as a charge to earnings in the period 
in which the impairment is determined.

Level 1—Financial instruments for which prices 
are quoted in active markets, which, for us, include 
investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted 
market prices and equities listed in active markets.

For investments in illiquid or privately-held securities for 
which market prices or quotations are not readily available, 
the determination of fair value requires us to estimate 
the value of the securities using a variety of methods and 
resources, including the most current available financial 
information for the investment and the industry. As of 
March 31, 2014 and 2013, excluding investments in CIVs, 
we owned approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, 
respectively, of financial investments that were valued on 
our assumptions or estimates and unobservable inputs.

At March 31, 2014 and 2013, we also had approximately 
$87.4 million and $99.9 million, respectively, of other 
investments, such as investment partnerships, that are 
included in Other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated 
Balance Sheets, of which approximately $63.0 million and 
$68.8 million, respectively, are accounted for under the 
equity method. The remainder is accounted for under the 
cost method, which considers if factors indicate there 
may be an impairment in the value of these investments. 
In addition, as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, we had $22.6 
million and $56.3 million, respectively, of equity method 
investments that are included in Investment securities on 
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and 
disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework 
for measuring fair value. The accounting guidance defines 
fair value as the exchange price that would be received 
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal 
or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in 
an orderly transaction between market participants on 
the measurement date. A fair value measurement should 
reflect all of the assumptions that market participants 
would use in pricing the asset or liability, including 
assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular 
valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale 
or use of an asset, and the risk of non-performance.

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements 
establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs for 
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair 
value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices 
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the 
lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

Our financial instruments measured and reported at fair value 
are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 2—Financial instruments for which prices 
are quoted for similar assets and liabilities in active 
markets; prices are quoted for identical or similar assets 
in inactive markets; or prices are based on observable 
inputs, other than quoted prices, such as models or 
other valuation methodologies. For us, this category 
may include repurchase agreements, fixed income 
securities and certain proprietary fund products. 
This category also includes CLO loans and derivative 
liabilities of a CIV.

Level 3—Financial instruments for which values are 
based on unobservable inputs, including those for 
which there is little or no market activity. This category 
includes investments in partnerships, limited liability 
companies, private equity funds and CLO debt of a CIV. 
This category may also include certain proprietary fund 
products with redemption restrictions.

The valuation of an asset or liability may involve inputs from 
more than one level of the hierarchy. The level in the fair 
value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its 
entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input 
that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Proprietary fund products and certain investments held 
by CIVs are valued at net asset value (“NAV”) determined 
by the fund administrator. These funds are typically 
invested in exchange traded investments with observable 
market prices. Their valuations may be classified as 
Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 based on whether the fund 
is exchange traded, the frequency of the related NAV 
determinations and the impact of redemption restrictions. 
For investments in illiquid and privately-held securities 
(private equity and investment partnerships) for which 
market prices or quotations may not be readily available, 
including certain investments held by CIVs, management 
must estimate the value of the securities using a variety 
of methods and resources, including the most current 
available financial information for the investment and the 
industry to which it applies in order to determine fair value. 
These valuation processes for illiquid and privately-held 
securities inherently require management’s judgment and 
are therefore classified in Level 3.

The fair values of CLO loans and bonds are determined 
based on prices from well-recognized third-party pricing 
services that utilize available market data and are therefore 
classified as Level 2. Legg Mason has established controls 
designed to assess the reasonableness of the prices 

48

Legg Masonprovided. The fair value of CLO debt is valued using 
a discounted cash flow methodology. Inputs used to 
determine the expected cash flows include assumptions 
about forecasted default and recovery rates that a market 
participant would use in determining the fair value of the 
CLO’s underlying collateral assets. Given the significance 
of the unobservable inputs to the fair value measurement, 
the CLO debt valuation is classified as Level 3.

Exchange traded options are valued using the last sale 
price or in the absence of a sale, the last offering price. 
Options traded over the counter are valued using dealer 
supplied valuations. Options are classified as Level 1. 
Futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price at 
the end of each day on the exchange upon which they are 
traded and are classified as Level 1.

As a practical expedient, we rely on the NAVs of certain 
investments as their fair value. The NAVs that have been 
provided by investees are derived from the fair values of 
the underlying investments as of the reporting date.

As of March 31, 2014, approximately 2% of total assets 
(11% of financial assets measured at fair value) and 5% 
of total liabilities meet the definition of Level 3. Excluding 
the assets and liabilities of CIVs, approximately 1% of total 
assets (7% of financial assets measured at fair value) and 
1% of liabilities meet the definition of Level 3.

Any transfers between categories are measured at the 
beginning of the period.

See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
for additional information.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Balances as of March 31, 2014, are as follows (in 
thousands):

Amortizable asset management contracts

Indefinite-life intangible assets

Trade names

Goodwill

$        9,969

3,109,004

52,800

1,240,523

$4,412,296

Our identifiable intangible assets consist primarily of asset 
management contracts, contracts to manage proprietary 
mutual funds or funds-of-hedge funds, and trade names 
resulting from acquisitions. Asset management contracts 
are amortizable intangible assets that are capitalized at 
acquisition and amortized over the expected life of the 
contract. Contracts to manage proprietary mutual funds or 
funds-of-hedge funds are indefinite-life intangible assets 
because we assume that there is no foreseeable limit 
on the contract period due to the likelihood of continued 

renewal at little or no cost. Similarly, trade names are 
considered indefinite-life intangible assets because they 
are expected to generate cash flows indefinitely.

In allocating the purchase price of an acquisition to 
intangible assets, we must determine the fair value of the 
assets acquired. We determine fair values of intangible 
assets acquired based upon projected future cash flows, 
which take into consideration estimates and assumptions 
including profit margins, growth or attrition rates for 
acquired contracts based upon historical experience, 
estimated contract lives, discount rates, projected net 
client flows and market performance. The determination 
of estimated contract lives requires judgment based 
upon historical client turnover and attrition rates and the 
probability that contracts with termination provisions will 
be renewed. The discount rate employed is a weighted-
average cost of capital that takes into consideration a 
premium representing the degree of risk inherent in the 
asset, as more fully described below.

Goodwill represents the residual amount of acquisition 
cost in excess of identified tangible and intangible assets 
and assumed liabilities.

Given the relative significance of our intangible assets 
and goodwill to our consolidated financial statements, on 
a quarterly basis we consider if triggering events have 
occurred that may indicate a significant change in fair 
values. Triggering events may include significant adverse 
changes in our business, legal or regulatory environment, 
loss of key personnel, significant business dispositions, or 
other events, including changes in economic arrangements 
with our affiliates that will impact future operating results. 
If a triggering event has occurred, we perform quantitative 
tests, which include critical reviews of all significant factors 
and assumptions, to determine if any intangible assets 
or goodwill are impaired. We consider factors such as 
projected cash flows and revenue multiples, to determine 
whether the value of the assets is impaired and the 
indefinite-life assumptions are appropriate. If an asset is 
impaired, the difference between the value of the asset 
reflected on the consolidated financial statements and its 
current fair value is recognized as an expense in the period 
in which the impairment is determined. If a triggering event 
has not occurred, we perform quantitative tests annually 
at December 31, for indefinite-life intangible assets and 
goodwill, unless we can qualitatively conclude that it is more 
likely than not that the respective fair values exceed the 
related carrying values.

We completed our annual impairment tests of goodwill 
and indefinite-life intangible assets as of December 31, 
2013, and determined that there were no impairments 
in the value of these assets as of that date. Further, no 

49

Legg Masonimpairments in the values of amortizable intangible assets 
was recognized during the year ended March 31, 2014, as 
our estimates of the related future cash flows exceeded 
the asset carrying values. We have also determined that 
no triggering events have occurred as of March 31, 2014, 
therefore, no additional indefinite-life intangible asset and 
goodwill impairment testing was necessary. As a result of 
uncertainty regarding future market conditions, assessing 
the fair value of the reporting unit and intangible assets 
requires management to exercise significant judgment.

Amortizable Intangible Assets
Intangible assets subject to amortization are considered 
for impairment at each reporting period using an 
undiscounted cash flow analysis. Significant assumptions 
used in assessing the recoverability of management 
contract intangible assets include projected cash 
flows generated by the contracts and the remaining 
lives of the contracts. Projected cash flows are based 
on fees generated by current AUM for the applicable 
contracts. Contracts are generally assumed to turnover 
evenly throughout the life of the intangible asset. The 
remaining life of the asset is based upon factors such as 
average client retention and client turnover rates. If the 
amortization periods are not appropriate, the expected 
lives are adjusted and the impact on the fair value is 
assessed. Actual cash flows in any one period may vary 
from the projected cash flows without resulting in an 
impairment charge because a variance in any one period 
must be considered in conjunction with other assumptions 
that impact projected cash flows.

The estimated remaining useful lives of amortizable 
intangible assets currently range from one to five years 
with a weighted-average life of approximately 3.2 years.

Indefinite-Life Intangible Assets
For intangible assets with lives that are indeterminable 
or indefinite, fair value is determined from a market 
participant’s perspective based on projected discounted 
cash flows, taking into account the values market 
participants would pay in a taxable transaction to acquire 
the respective assets. We have two primary types of 
indefinite-life intangible assets: proprietary fund contracts 
and, to a lesser extent, trade names.

We determine the fair value of our intangible assets based 
upon discounted projected cash flows, which take into 
consideration estimates of future fees, profit margins, 
growth rates, taxes, and discount rates. An asset is 
determined to be impaired if the current implied fair value 
is less than the recorded carrying value of the asset. 
The determination of the fair values of our indefinite-life 
intangible assets is highly dependent on these estimates 

and changes in these inputs could result in a material 
impairment of the related carrying values. If an asset is 
impaired, the difference between the current implied fair 
value and the carrying value of the asset reflected on the 
financial statements is recognized as an expense in the 
period in which the impairment is determined to exist.

Contracts that are managed and operated as a single unit, 
such as contracts within the same family of funds, are 
reviewed in aggregate and are considered interchangeable 
because investors can transfer between funds with 
limited restrictions. Similarly, cash flows generated by 
new funds added to the fund group are included when 
determining the fair value of the intangible asset. The 
Fauchier acquisition completed by Permal in March 
2013 included a funds-of-hedge fund business, which, 
as intended, has been merged with the existing Permal 
fund business through common management, shared 
resources (including infrastructure, employees and 
processes) and co-branding initiatives. Accordingly, the 
related carrying values and cash flows of these funds 
have been aggregated for impairment testing.

Projected cash flows are based on annualized cash flows 
for the applicable contracts projected forward 40 years, 
assuming annual cash flow growth from estimated 
net client flows and projected market performance. To 
estimate the projected cash flows, projected AUM growth 
rates by affiliate are used. Cash flow growth rates consider 
estimates of both AUM flows and market expectations 
by asset class (equity, fixed income and liquidity) and by 
investment manager based upon, among other things, 
historical experience and expectations of future market 
and investment performance from internal and external 
sources. Currently, our market growth assumptions are 
6% for equity, 3% for fixed income, and 0% for liquidity 
products, with a general assumption of 2% organic growth 
for all products, subject to exceptions for organic growth 
or contraction in near-term periods.

The starting point for these assumptions is our corporate 
planning process that includes three-year AUM projections 
from the management of each operating affiliate that 
consider the specific business circumstances of each 
affiliate, with near-year flow assumptions for certain 
affiliates adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect a market 
participant view. Beyond year three, the estimates move 
towards our general organic growth assumption of 2%, as 
appropriate for each affiliate and asset class, through year 
20. The resulting cash flow growth rate for year 20 is held 
constant and used to further project cash flows through 
year 40. Based on projected AUM by affiliate and asset 
class, affiliate advisory fee rates are applied to determine 
projected revenues. The domestic mutual fund contracts 
projected revenues are applied to a weighted-average 

50

Legg Masonmargin for the applicable affiliates that manage the 
AUM. Margins are based on arrangements currently in 
place at each affiliate. Projected operating income is 
further reduced by an appropriate tax rate to calculate the 
projected cash flows.

We believe our growth assumptions are reasonable given 
our consideration of multiple inputs, including internal and 
external sources, although our assumptions are subject 
to change based on fluctuations in our actual results and 
market conditions. Our assumptions are also subject to 
change due to, among other factors, poor investment 
performance by one or more of our operating affiliates, 
the withdrawal of AUM by clients, changes in business 
climate, adverse regulatory actions, or loss of key 
personnel. We consider these risks in the development 
of our growth assumptions and discount rates, discussed 
further below. Further, actual cash flows in any one period 
may vary from the projected cash flows without resulting 
in an impairment charge because a variance in any one 
period must be considered in conjunction with other 
assumptions that impact projected cash flows.

Our process includes comparison of actual results to 
prior growth projections. However, differences between 
actual results and our prior projections are not necessarily 
indicative of a need to reassess our estimates given that: 
our discounted projected cash flow analyses include 
projections well beyond three years and variances in the 
near-years may be offset in subsequent years; fair value 
assessments are point-in-time, and the consistency of 
a fair value assessment with other indicators of value 
that reflect expectations of market participants at that 
point-in-time is critical evidence of the soundness of the 
estimate of value. In subsequent periods, we consider 
the differences in actual results from our prior projections 
in considering the reasonableness of the growth 
assumptions used in our current impairment testing.

Discount rates are based on appropriately weighted 
estimated costs of debt and equity capital using a market 
participant perspective. We estimate the cost of debt based 
on published debt rates. We estimate the cost of equity 
capital based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which 
considers the risk-free interest rate, peer-group betas, 
and company and equity risk premiums. The equity risk is 
further adjusted to consider the relative risk associated with 
each Legg Mason indefinite-life intangible asset and our 
reporting unit. The discount rates are also calibrated based 
on an assessment of relevant market values.

Consistent with standard valuation practices for taxable 
transactions, the projected discounted cash flow analysis 
also factors in a tax benefit value, as appropriate. This tax 

benefit represents the discounted tax savings a third party 
that purchased an asset on a given valuation date would 
receive from future tax deductions for the amortization of 
the purchase price over 15 years.

The domestic mutual fund contracts acquired in the 
Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”) transaction of 
$2,106 million, account for approximately 65% of our 
indefinite-life intangible assets. As of December 31, 2013, 
approximately $138 billion of AUM, primarily managed 
by ClearBridge and Western Asset, are associated with 
this asset, with approximately 40% in equity AUM 
and 30% in each of long-term fixed AUM and liquidity 
AUM. Although our domestic mutual funds overall have 
maintained strong recent market performance, previously 
disclosed uncertainties regarding market conditions and 
asset flows and more recent assessments of related risk, 
including risks related to potential regulatory changes 
in the liquidity business, are reflected in our projected 
discounted cash flow analyses. Based on our projected 
discounted cash flow analyses, the related fair value 
exceeded its carrying value by approximately $450 million. 
For our impairment test, cash flows from the domestic 
mutual fund contracts are assumed to have annual growth 
rates that average approximately 6%, but given current 
uncertainties, reflect only moderate AUM inflows in years 
1 and 2. Projected cash flows of the domestic mutual fund 
contracts are discounted at 14.0%, reflecting the business 
factors noted above. Results for the 12 months through 
December 31, 2013, generally compared favorably to the 
growth assumptions related to the domestic mutual fund 
contracts asset impairment testing at December 31, 2012. 

We believe that investment performance also has a 
significant influence on our domestic mutual fund contract 
long-term flows, and that continued out-performance 
will favorably impact our flows. In aggregate, 61% of our 
domestic mutual fund long-term AUM is in funds that 
have outpaced their three-year Lipper category average 
at December 31, 2013, which has improved from 33% at 
September 30, 2008. Generally, there tends to be a four 
to five-year lag before improved investment performance 
results in increased asset flows. In addition, we believe 
a recent reorganization of our distribution platform, 
which provides an improved focus on the growth of our 
business, has also favorably impacted our flows. The 
improvement in investment performance has assisted 
distribution personnel in selling more products. As a result 
of improved performance and the reorganization of the 
distribution platform, our U.S. distribution group has had 
net inflows for the 12 months through December 31, 2013.

Assuming all other factors remain the same, our actual 
results and/or changes in assumptions for the domestic 

51

Legg Masonmutual fund contracts cash flow projections over the long-
term would have to deviate approximately 20% or more 
from previous projections, or the discount rate would have 
to be raised from 14.0% to 16.0%, for the asset to be 
deemed impaired. Given the current uncertainty regarding 
future market conditions, it is reasonably possible that 
fund performance, flows and AUM levels may decrease 
in the near term such that actual cash flows from the 
domestic mutual funds contracts could deviate from the 
projections by approximately 20% or more and the asset 
could be deemed to be impaired by a material amount.

The Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts of $692 
million account for approximately 20% of our indefinite-life 
intangible assets. Permal has experienced recent outflows 
and increased risk associated with its business. The past 
several years have seen declines in the traditional high 
net worth client fund-of-hedge funds business, Permal’s 
historical focus, which Permal has offset to some extent 
with new institutional business. Despite these factors, 
the impact of the acquired Fauchier business, which has 
experienced better revenues, including performance fees, 
than originally projected, contributed to actual results 
which marginally exceeded previous projections for the 
Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts used in the asset 
impairment testing at December 31, 2012. As a result of 
continued risk with its business, in our December 2013 
testing, the near-term growth assumptions for these 
contracts were reduced. Further, fund-of-hedge fund 
managers are subject to unique market and regulatory 
influences, adding additional uncertainty to our estimates.

Based upon our projected discounted cash flow analyses, 
the fair value of the Permal funds-of-hedge funds 
contracts asset exceeded its carrying value by $70 million. 
Cash flows on the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts 
are assumed to have an average annual growth rate of 
approximately 7%. However, given current experience, 
projected cash flows reflect moderate AUM outflows in 
year one, and no net AUM flows in year two, trending 
to moderate AUM inflows in year three. Investment 
performance, including its expected impact on future asset 
flows, is a significant factor in our growth projections for 
the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts. Our market 
performance projections are supported by the fact that 
Permal’s two largest funds that comprise approximately 
half of the contracts asset AUM have 10-year average 
returns exceeding 5%. Our market projections are further 
supported by industry statistics. The projected cash flows 
from the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts are 
discounted at 15.5%, reflecting the factors noted above.

Assuming all other factors remain the same, our actual 
results and/or changes in assumptions for the Permal 
funds-of-hedge funds contracts cash flow projections over 
the long-term would have to deviate approximately 10% or 
more from previous projections, or the discount rate would 
have to be raised from 15.5% to 16.5%, for the asset to be 
deemed impaired. Given the current uncertainty regarding 
future market conditions, it is reasonably possible that 
fund performance, flows and AUM levels may decrease in 
the near term such that actual cash flows from the Permal 
funds-of-hedge funds contracts could deviate from the 
projections by approximately 10% or more and the asset 
could be deemed to be impaired by a material amount.

Trade names account for 2% of indefinite-life intangible 
assets and are primarily related to Permal. We tested 
these intangible assets using assumptions similar to those 
described above for indefinite-life contracts. The resulting 
fair values of the trade names significantly exceeded the 
related carrying amounts.

Goodwill
Goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level and is 
considered for impairment when the carrying amount of the 
reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting 
unit. In estimating the implied fair value of the reporting 
unit, we use valuation techniques based on discounted 
projected cash flows and EBITDA multiples, similar to 
techniques employed in analyzing the purchase price of an 
acquisition. Legg Mason continues to be managed as one 
Global Asset Management operating segment. Internal 
management reporting of discrete financial information 
regularly received by the chief operating decision maker, 
our Chief Executive Officer, is at the consolidated Global 
Asset Management business level. As a result, goodwill is 
recorded and evaluated at one Global Asset Management 
reporting unit level. Our Global Asset Management 
reporting unit consists of the operating businesses of 
our asset management affiliates and our centralized 
global distribution operations. In our impairment testing 
process, all consolidated assets (except for certain tax 
benefits) and liabilities are allocated to our single Global 
Asset Management reporting unit. Similarly, the projected 
operating results of the reporting unit include our holding 
company corporate costs and overhead, including costs 
associated with executive management, finance, human 
resources, legal and compliance, internal audit and other 
central corporate functions.

Goodwill principally originated from the acquisitions of 
CAM, Permal and Royce. The value of the reporting unit 
is based in part, on projected consolidated net cash flows, 
including all cash flows of assets managed in our mutual 

52

Legg Masonfunds, closed-end funds and other proprietary funds, in 
addition to separate account assets of our managers.

Significant assumptions used in assessing the implied fair 
value of the reporting unit under the discounted cash flow 
method are consistent with the methodology discussed 
above for indefinite-life intangible assets. Also, at the 
reporting unit level, future corporate costs are estimated 
and consolidated with the projected operating results of all 
our affiliates.

Actual cash flows in any one period may vary from the 
projected cash flows without resulting in an impairment 
charge because a variance in any one period must be 
considered in conjunction with other assumptions that 
impact projected cash flows. For the reporting unit 
discounted projected cash flow analysis, projected cash 
flows, on an aggregate basis across all asset classes, 
are assumed to have an average annual growth rate of 
approximately 8%.

Discount rates are based on appropriately weighted 
estimated costs of debt using a market participant 
perspective, also consistent with the methodology 
discussed above for indefinite-life intangible assets. 
For our impairment test as of December 31, 2013, the 
projected cash flows were discounted at 14.5% to 
determine their present value, reflecting the company/
asset specific factors noted above.

We also perform a market-based valuation of our 
reporting unit value, which applies an average of EBITDA 
multiples paid in change of control transactions for peer 
companies to our EBITDA. The observed average EBITDA 
multiple utilized was 11.0x, from 11 asset management 
transactions dated January 2010 through December 
2012. The results of our two estimates of value for the 
reporting unit (the discounted cash flow and EBITDA 
multiple analyses) are compared and any significant 
difference is assessed to determine the reasonableness 
of each value and whether any adjustment to either 
result is warranted. Once the values are accepted, the 
appropriately weighted average of the two reporting unit 
valuations (the discounted cash flow and EBITDA multiple 
analyses) is used as the implied fair value of our Global 
Asset Management reporting unit, which at December 31, 
2013, exceeded the carrying value by a material amount. 
Considering the relative merits of the details involved in 
each valuation process, we used an equal weighting of the 
two values for the December 2013 testing.

We further assess the accuracy of the reporting unit value 
determined from these valuation methods by comparing 
their results to our market capitalization to determine 
an implied control premium. The reasonableness of this 

implied control premium is considered by comparing it to 
control premiums that have been paid in relevant actual 
change of control transactions. This assessment provides 
evidence that our underlying assumptions in our analyses 
of our reporting unit fair value are reasonable.

In calculating our market capitalization for these purposes, 
market volatility can have a significant impact on our 
capitalization, and if appropriate, we may consider the 
average market prices of our stock for a period of one 
or two months before the test date to determine market 
capitalization. A control premium arises from the fact 
that in an acquisition, there is typically a premium paid 
over current market prices of publicly traded companies 
that relates to the ability to control the operations of 
an acquired company. Further, assessments of control 
premiums in the asset management industry are 
difficult because many acquisitions involve privately held 
companies, or involve only portions of a public company, 
such that no control premium can be calculated. Asset 
manager transactions are often valued on EBITDA 
multiples which, absent unusual circumstances, have 
generally been consistently priced in a range of 8x to 13x 
EBITDA over the past several years.

Recent market evidence regarding control premiums 
suggest values of 13% to 79% as realistic and common 
and we believe such premiums to be a reasonable range 
of estimation for our equity value. Based on our analysis 
and consideration, we believe the implied control premium 
determined by our reporting unit value estimation at 
December 31, 2013, which is at the lower end of the 
observed range, is reasonable.

Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation plans include stock 
options, an employee stock purchase plan, market-based 
performance shares payable in common stock, restricted 
stock awards and units, management equity plans and 
deferred compensation payable in stock. Under our stock 
compensation plans, we issue equity awards to directors, 
officers, and key employees.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, 
compensation expense for the years ended March 31, 
2014, 2013 and 2012, includes compensation cost for all 
non-vested share-based awards at their grant date fair 
value amortized over the respective vesting periods on the 
straight-line method. Also, under the accounting guidance, 
cash flows related to income tax deductions in excess of 
or less than the stock-based compensation expense are 
classified as financing cash flows.

We granted 1.2 million, 1.0 million, and 0.8 million stock 
options in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During 

53

Legg Masonfiscal 2014, we also implemented management equity 
plans for two of our affiliates and granted units to certain 
of their employees that entitle them to participate in 15% 
of the future growth of the respective affiliate’s enterprise 
value (subject to appropriate discounts). For additional 
information on share-based compensation, see Note 11 of 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We determine the fair value of each option grant using 
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, except for 
market-based grants, for which we use a Monte Carlo 
option-pricing model. Both models require management 
to develop estimates regarding certain input variables. The 
inputs for the Black-Scholes model include: stock price 
on the date of grant, exercise price of the option, dividend 
yield, volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest 
rate, all of which, with the exception of the grant date 
stock price and the exercise price, require estimates or 
assumptions. We calculate the dividend yield based upon 
the average of the historical quarterly dividend payments 
over a term equal to the expected life of the options. We 
estimate volatility equally weighted between the historical 
prices of our stock over a period equal to the expected 
life of the option and the implied volatility of market listed 
options at the date of grant. The expected life is the 
estimated length of time an option will be held before it 
is either exercised or canceled, based upon our historical 
option exercise experience. The risk-free interest rate is the 
rate available for zero-coupon U.S. Government issues with 
a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options 
being valued. If we used different methods to estimate our 
variables for the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo models, or 
if we used a different type of option-pricing model, the fair 
value of our option grants might be different.

We also determine the fair value of affiliate management 
equity plan grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing 
model, subject to any post-vesting illiquidity discounts. 
Inputs to the Black-Scholes model are generally 
determined in a fashion similar to the fair value of grants 
of options in our own stock, described above. However, 
because our affiliates are private companies without 
quoted stock prices, we utilize discounted cash flow 
analyses and market-based valuations, similar to those 
discussed above under the heading “Intangible Assets 
and Goodwill,” to determine the respective business 
enterprise values, subject to appropriate discounts for lack 
of control and marketability.

Income Taxes
We are subject to the income tax laws of the federal, 
state and local jurisdictions of the U.S. and numerous 
foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. We file income 
tax returns representing our filing positions with each 

jurisdiction. Due to the inherent complexities arising from 
conducting business and being taxed in a substantial 
number of jurisdictions, we must make certain estimates 
and judgments in determining our income tax provision for 
financial statement purposes.

These estimates and judgments are used in determining 
the tax basis of assets and liabilities and in the 
calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities that arise 
from differences in the timing of revenue and expense 
recognition for tax and financial statement purposes. 
Management assesses the likelihood that we will be able 
to realize our deferred tax assets. If it is more likely than 
not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized, then a 
valuation allowance is established with a corresponding 
increase to deferred tax provision.

Substantially all of our deferred tax assets relate to U.S. and 
U.K. taxing jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2014, U.S. federal 
deferred tax assets aggregated $763 million, realization 
of which is expected to require $3.8 billion of future U.S. 
earnings, approximately $673 million of which must be in 
the form of foreign source income. Deferred tax assets 
generated in U.S. jurisdictions resulting from net operating 
losses generally expire 20 years after they are generated 
and those resulting from foreign tax credits generally expire 
10 years after they are generated. Based on estimates of 
future taxable income, using assumptions consistent with 
those used in our goodwill impairment testing, it is more 
likely than not that current federal tax benefits relating 
to net operating losses are realizable and no valuation 
allowance is necessary at this time. With respect to those 
resulting from foreign tax credits, it is more likely than 
not that tax benefits relating to the utilization of $39.9 
million foreign tax credits as credits will not be realized 
and an additional valuation allowance of $2.3 million was 
recorded in fiscal 2014 with respect thereto. In addition, a 
valuation allowance was established in prior years for the 
substantial portion of our deferred tax assets relating to 
U.K. taxing jurisdictions. While tax planning may enhance 
our positions, the realization of current tax benefits is not 
dependent on any significant tax strategies.

As of March 31, 2014, U.S. state deferred tax assets 
aggregated $180 million. Due to limitations on the 
utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and taking 
into consideration state tax planning strategies, we 
recognized an additional valuation allowance of $8.6 
million during fiscal 2014. Additionally, $34.8 million of fully 
reserved deferred tax assets relating to U.S. state capital 
loss carryforwards expired unused during fiscal 2014. Due 
to the uncertainty of future state apportionment factors 
and future effective state tax rates, the value of state net 
operating loss benefits ultimately realized may vary.

54

Legg MasonAn increase in the valuation allowance against certain U.K. 
deferred tax assets of $0.5 million, which resulted in a full 
valuation allowance, was also recorded in fiscal 2014. To 
the extent our analysis of the realization of deferred tax 
assets relies on deferred tax liabilities, we have considered 
the timing, nature and jurisdiction of reversals, as well 
as, future increases relating to the tax amortization of 
goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets. In the event 
we determine all or any portion of our deferred tax assets 
that are not already subject to a valuation allowance are 
not realizable, we will be required to establish a valuation 
allowance by a charge to the income tax provision in the 
period in which that determination is made. Depending on 
the facts and circumstances, the charge could be material 
to our earnings.

The calculation of our tax liabilities involves uncertainties in 
the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize 
liabilities for anticipated tax uncertainties in the U.S. and 

other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, 
and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due.

RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
See discussion of Recent Accounting Developments in 
Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

EFFECTS OF INFLATION
The rate of inflation can directly affect various expenses, 
including employee compensation, communications 
and technology and occupancy, which may not be 
readily recoverable in charges for services provided by 
us. Further, to the extent inflation adversely affects the 
securities markets, it may impact revenues and recorded 
intangible asset and goodwill values. See discussion of 
“Market Risk—Revenues and Net Income (Loss)” and 
“Critical Accounting Policies—Intangible Assets and 
Goodwill” previously discussed.

55

Legg MasonReport of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of Legg Mason, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over 
financial reporting.

Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding 
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with 
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Legg Mason’s internal control over financial 
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable 
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Legg Mason; (ii) provide reasonable 
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with 
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of Legg 
Mason are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Legg Mason; and (iii) 
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of 
Legg Mason’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 
2014, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 
(“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992). Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as 
of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria established in 
the COSO framework.

The effectiveness of Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, has been audited by 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing 
herein, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Legg Mason’s internal control over financial 
reporting as of March 31, 2014.

Joseph A. Sullivan  
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Peter H. Nachtwey 
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

56

Legg Mason 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors 
and Stockholders of Legg Mason, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), 
comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, 
the financial position of Legg Mason, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, 
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2014 
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the 
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, 
based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial 
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness 
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over 
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal 
control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards 
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform 
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement 
and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the 
financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial 
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating 
the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an 
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing 
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also 
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits 
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding 
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with 
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies 
and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect 
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are 
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations 
of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely 
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the 
financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Baltimore, Maryland 
May 23, 2014 

57

Legg MasonConsolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated investment vehicles
Restricted cash
Receivables:

Investment advisory and related fees
Other

Investment securities
Investment securities of consolidated investment vehicles
Deferred income taxes
Other
Other assets of consolidated investment vehicles

Total Current Assets

Fixed assets, net
Intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Investments of consolidated investment vehicles
Deferred income taxes
Other
Other assets of consolidated investment vehicles

Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Liabilities

Current Liabilities

Accrued compensation
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Current portion of long-term debt
Other
Debt and other current liabilities of consolidated investment vehicles

Total Current Liabilities

Deferred compensation
Deferred income taxes
Other
Other liabilities of consolidated investment vehicles
Long-term debt
Long-term debt of consolidated investment vehicles

Total Liabilities
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Stockholders’ Equity

Common stock, par value $.10; authorized 500,000,000 shares;  

issued 117,173,639 shares in 2014 and 125,341,361 shares in 2013

Additional paid-in capital
Employee stock trust
Deferred compensation employee stock trust
Retained earnings
Appropriated retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net

Total Stockholders’ Equity

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

58

March 31,

2014

2013

$  858,022
56,372
13,455

$   933,036
46,541
8,812

348,633
68,186
467,726
50,463
186,147
47,677
31,702
2,128,383
189,241
3,171,773
1,240,523
31,810
165,705
183,706
208
$7,111,349

$  425,466
214,819
438
91,586
88,936
821,245
49,618
265,583
166,209
—
1,038,826
—
2,341,481

350,726
72,392
371,080
24,792
85,257
48,239
1,987
1,942,862
201,819
3,177,562
1,269,165
210,553
279,361
187,274
1,064
$7,269,660

$   351,965
214,803
50,438
74,940
10,320
702,466
56,809
161,298
204,446
2,930
1,094,516
207,835
2,430,300

45,144

21,009

11,717
3,148,396
(29,922)
29,922
1,526,662
—
37,949
4,724,724
$7,111,349

12,534
3,449,190
(32,623)
32,623
1,304,259
4,829
47,539
4,818,351
$7,269,660

Legg MasonConsolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

OPERATING REVENUES

Investment advisory fees:

Separate accounts

Funds

Performance fees

Distribution and service fees

Other

Total Operating Revenues

OPERATING EXPENSES

Compensation and benefits

Transition-related compensation

Total Compensation and Benefits

Distribution and servicing

Communications and technology

Occupancy

Amortization of intangible assets

Impairment of intangible assets

Other

Total Operating Expenses

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended March 31,

2014

2013

2012

$  777,420 $  730,326

$   775,534

1,501,278

1,446,066

1,491,325

107,087

347,598

8,374

98,568

330,480

7,210

49,499

340,966

5,250

2,741,757

2,612,650

2,662,574

1,210,387

1,188,470

1,109,671

—

—

34,638

1,210,387

1,188,470

1,144,309

619,070

157,872

115,234

12,314

600,644

149,645

171,941

14,019

— 734,000

649,739

164,712

154,816

19,574

—

195,987

188,430

190,671

2,310,864

3,047,149

2,323,821

430,893

(434,499)

338,753

OTHER NON-OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)

Interest income

Interest expense

Other income (expense), net, including $68,975 debt extinguishment loss in 2013

Other non-operating income (loss) of consolidated investment vehicles, net

Total Other Non-Operating Income (Expense)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)

Income tax provision (benefit)

NET INCOME (LOSS)

6,367

(52,911)

32,818

2,474

(11,252)

419,641

137,805

281,836

7,590

(62,919)

(17,958)

(2,821)

(76,108)

(510,607)

(150,859)

(359,748)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

(2,948)

(6,421)

11,481

(87,584)

22,097

18,336

(35,670)

303,083

72,052

231,031

10,214

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO LEGG MASON, INC.

$   284,784 $   (353,327) $   220,817

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO LEGG MASON, INC.  
  COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

Basic

Diluted

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

$ 

$ 

 2.34 $ 

  (2.65) $   

  1.54

 2.33 $ 

  (2.65) $   

  1.54

59

Legg Mason 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Dollars in thousands)

NET INCOME (LOSS)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustment

Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:

Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax provision (benefit) of  

$(123), $(1) and $132, respectively

Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Years Ended March 31,

   2014

 2013

2012

$281,836

$(359,748)

$231,031

(9,424)

(23,945)

(22,098)

(184)

18

(166)

(1)

13

12

(9,590)

(23,933)

272,246

(383,681)

(2,948)

(6,421)

198

11

209

(21,889)

209,142

10,214

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO LEGG MASON, INC.

$275,194

$(377,260)

$198,928

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

60

Legg MasonConsolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Dollars in thousands)

COMMON STOCK

Beginning balance

Stock options and other stock-based compensation

Deferred compensation employee stock trust

Deferred compensation, net

Equity Units exchanged

Employee tax withholdings by settlement of net share transactions

Shares repurchased and retired

Ending balance

ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL

Beginning balance

Stock options and other stock-based compensation

Deferred compensation employee stock trust

Deferred compensation, net

Equity Units exchanged

Employee tax withholdings by settlement of net share transactions

Shares repurchased and retired

Redeemable noncontrolling interest for management equity plan

Allocation from 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes repurchase, net of tax

Ending balance

EMPLOYEE STOCK TRUST

Beginning balance

Shares issued to plans

Distributions and forfeitures

Ending balance

DEFERRED COMPENSATION EMPLOYEE STOCK TRUST

Beginning balance

Shares issued to plans

Distributions and forfeitures

Ending balance

RETAINED EARNINGS
Beginning balance

Net income (loss) attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

Dividends declared

Ending balance

APPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS FOR CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT VEHICLE

Beginning balance

Net income (loss) reclassified to appropriated retained earnings

Ending balance

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET

Beginning balance

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities

Foreign currency translation adjustment

Ending balance

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Years Ended March 31,

   2014

2013

2012

$  

 12,534

$ 

 13,987

$ 

 15,022

83

5

118

—

(55)

8

8

192

—

(41)

17

7

124

183

(6)

(968)

11,717

(1,620)

12,534

(1,360)

13,987

3,449,190

3,864,216

4,111,095

29,537

1,779

48,143

—

5,198

1,803

44,246

16,508

2,020

32,193

—

102,831

(19,409)

(11,303)

(1,525)

(359,028)

(423,855)

(398,906)

(1,816)

—

—

(31,115)

—

—

3,148,396

3,449,190

3,864,216

(32,623)

(32,419)

(34,466)

(1,784)

4,485

(1,811)

1,607

(2,027)

4,074

(29,922)

(32,623)

(32,419)

32,623

1,784

(4,485)

29,922

32,419

1,811

(1,607)

32,623

34,466

2,027

(4,074)

32,419

1,304,259

1,715,395

1,539,984

284,784

(62,381)

(353,327)

(57,809)

220,817

(45,406)

1,526,662

1,304,259

1,715,395

4,829

(4,829)

—

47,539

(166)

(9,424)

37,949

12,221

(7,392)

4,829

71,472

12

(23,945)

47,539

10,922

1,299

12,221

93,361

209

(22,098)

71,472

$4,724,724

$4,818,351

$5,677,291

61

Legg MasonConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net Income (Loss)

2.5% Convertible Senior Notes:

Allocation of repurchase payment

Loss on extinguishment

Adjustments to reconcile Net Income (Loss) to net cash provided by operations:

Impairment of intangible assets

Depreciation and amortization

Imputed interest for 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes

Accretion and amortization of securities discounts and premiums, net

Stock-based compensation

Net gains on investments

Net losses (gains) of consolidated investment vehicles

Deferred income taxes

Other

Decrease (increase) in assets:

Investment advisory and related fees receivable

Net sales (purchases) of trading and other current investments

Other receivables

Other assets

Other assets of consolidated investment vehicles

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:

Accrued compensation

Deferred compensation

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

Other liabilities

Other liabilities of consolidated investment vehicles

CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Payments for fixed assets

Acquisitions/dispositions

Change in restricted cash

Purchases of investment securities

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities

Purchases of investments by consolidated investment vehicles

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments by consolidated investment vehicles

Years Ended March 31,

     2014

  2013

  2012

$281,836

$(359,748)

$ 231,031

—

—

—

62,845

—

3,037

66,488

(26,805)

(643)

118,430

3,276

(2,061)

(44,293)

14,105

(24,042)

(62,916)

76,968

(7,191)

319

(18,310)

(3,719)

437,324

(40,452)

1,351

(5,801)

(4,335)

4,306

(17,328)

199,886

(216,038)

68,975

734,000

87,848

5,839

3,295

58,983

(43,684)

5,358

(157,355)

1,725

(11,045)

189,347

(9,712)

(1,605)

(14,378)

(54,964)

(530)

8,690

3,112

5,219

—

—

—

93,795

39,077

4,552

48,735

(1,714)

(6,711)

49,192

(12,191)

31,790

(40,020)

1,432

1,810

53,720

42,763

(35,148)

(11,147)

28,135

(22,332)

303,332

496,769

(38,351)

(55,277)

(7,245)

(5,787)

5,272

(31,822)

3,060

11,221

(6,493)

6,197

(98,374)

(141,727)

188,739

161,894

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES

$137,627

$  (11,023)

$     2,330

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

62

Legg MasonConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(Dollars in thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Repayment of short-term borrowings

Years Ended March 31,

   2014

  2013

2012

$ 

  — $  (250,000)

$ 

  —

Repayment of 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes, net of operating allocation

— (1,040,212)

(1,014)

Repayment of long-term debt

Repayment of long-term debt of consolidated investment vehicles

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

Debt issuance costs

Issuance of common stock for stock-based compensation

Employee tax withholdings by settlement of net share transactions

Repurchase of common stock

Dividends paid

Net repayments of consolidated investment vehicles

Net (redemptions/distributions paid to)/subscriptions received from  

noncontrolling interest holders

CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE

Cash paid for:

(500,439)

(133,047)

(9,006)

(75,561)

393,740

1,143,246

(3,940)

25,603

(19,464)

(10,289)

1,986

(11,302)

—

—

—

—

4,538

—

(359,996)

(425,516)

(401,797)

(61,966)

(55,250)

—

—

(43,602)

(18,309)

20,438

(3,993)

(21,596)

(639,071)

(735,897)

(481,780)

(10,894)

(75,014)

(5,639)

(449,227)

(10,974)

6,345

933,036

1,382,263

1,375,918

$ 858,022

$   933,036

$1,382,263

Income taxes, net of refunds of $(13,835), $(2,313), and $(12,034), respectively

$    10,140

$ 

 32,318

$ 

 24,552

Interest

44,295

40,262

41,039

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

63

Legg Mason 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT  
ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation
Legg Mason, Inc. (“Parent”) and its subsidiaries 
(collectively, “Legg Mason”) are principally engaged in 
providing asset management and related financial services 
to individuals, institutions, corporations and municipalities.

The consolidated financial statements include the 
accounts of the Parent and its subsidiaries in which it 
has a controlling financial interest. Generally, an entity is 
considered to have a controlling financial interest when it 
owns a majority of the voting interest in an entity. Legg 
Mason is also required to consolidate any variable interest 
entity (“VIE”) in which it is considered to be the primary 
beneficiary. See “Consolidation” below and Note 17 for 
a further discussion of VIEs. All material intercompany 
balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Certain amounts in prior year financial statements have been 
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

All references to fiscal 2014, 2013 or 2012, refer to Legg 
Mason’s fiscal year ended March 31 of that year.

Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in 
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted 
in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and the applicable 
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the “SEC”), which require management to 
make assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts 
reported in the financial statements and accompanying 
notes, including revenue recognition, valuation of financial 
instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, stock-
based compensation, income taxes, and consolidation. 
Management believes that the estimates used are 
reasonable, although actual amounts could differ from 
the estimates and the differences could have a material 
impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Consolidation
In the normal course of its business, Legg Mason 
sponsors and is the manager of various types of 
investment vehicles. For its services, Legg Mason is 
entitled to receive management fees and may be eligible, 
under certain circumstances, to receive additional 
subordinated management fees or other incentive 
fees. Legg Mason’s exposure to risk in these entities is 
generally limited to any equity investment it has made 
or is required to make and any earned but uncollected 
management fees. Legg Mason did not sell or transfer 
assets to any of these investment vehicles. In accordance 
with financial accounting standards on consolidation, 

Legg Mason consolidates and separately identifies 
certain sponsored investment vehicles as consolidated 
investment vehicles (“CIVs”), the most significant of 
which is a collateralized loan obligation entity (“CLO”). The 
consolidation of these investment vehicles has no impact 
on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 
and does not have a material impact on Legg Mason’s 
consolidated operating results. The change in the value 
of these consolidated investment vehicles, which is 
recorded in Other Non-Operating Income (Expense), is 
reflected in Net Income (Loss), net of amounts allocated to 
noncontrolling interests.

Certain investment vehicles Legg Mason sponsors and 
is the manager of are considered to be VIEs (further 
described below) while others are considered to be voting 
rights entities (“VREs”) subject to traditional consolidation 
concepts based on ownership rights. Investment vehicles 
that are considered VREs are consolidated if Legg Mason 
has a controlling financial interest in the investment 
vehicle, absent substantive investor rights to replace 
the manager of the entity (kick-out rights). Legg Mason 
may also fund the initial cash investment in certain 
VRE investment vehicles to generate an investment 
performance track record in order to attract third-party 
investors in the product. Legg Mason’s initial investment in 
a new product typically represents 100% of the ownership 
in that product. As further discussed below, these “seed 
capital investments” are consolidated as long as Legg 
Mason maintains a controlling financial interest in the 
product, but they are not included as CIVs unless Legg 
Mason’s investment is longer term. Legg Mason held a 
longer-term controlling financial interest in one sponsored 
investment fund VRE, which has third-party investors and 
was consolidated and included as a CIV as of March 31, 
2014, 2013 and 2012.

A VIE is an entity which does not have adequate equity 
to finance its activities without additional subordinated 
financial support; or the equity investors, as a group, do 
not have the normal characteristics of equity for a potential 
controlling financial interest.

Investment Company VIEs
For most sponsored investment funds deemed to be 
investment companies, including money market funds, 
Legg Mason determines it is the primary beneficiary of a 
VIE if it absorbs a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, or 
receives a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, 
if any. Legg Mason’s determination of expected residual 
returns excludes gross fees paid to a decision maker if 
certain criteria are met. In determining whether it is the 
primary beneficiary of an investment company VIE, Legg 
Mason considers both qualitative and quantitative factors 

64

Legg Masonsuch as the voting rights of the equity holders; economic 
participation of all parties, including how fees are earned and 
paid to Legg Mason; related party (including employees’) 
ownership; guarantees and implied relationships.

Legg Mason concluded it was the primary beneficiary 
of one sponsored investment fund VIE, which was 
consolidated (and designated a CIV) as of March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012, despite significant third party investments 
in this product. As of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason also 
concluded it was the primary beneficiary of 16 employee-
owned funds it sponsors, which were consolidated and 
reported as CIVs.

Other VIEs
For other sponsored investment funds that do not meet 
the investment company criteria, Legg Mason determines 
it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE if it has both 
the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most 
significantly impact the entity’s economic performance 
and the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive 
benefits, that potentially could be significant to the VIE.

Legg Mason concluded that it was the primary beneficiary 
of one of three CLOs in which it has a variable interest. 
Although it holds no equity interest in these investment 
vehicles, it had both the power to control and had a 
significant variable interest in one CLO because of the 
level of its expected subordinated fees. As of March 31, 
2014, 2013 and 2012, the balances related to this CLO 
were consolidated and reported as a CIV in the Company’s 
consolidated financial statements. The other CLOs were not 
consolidated, as their level of expected fees is insignificant.

In determining the primary beneficiary of investment 
company VIEs and other VIEs, Legg Mason must make 
assumptions and estimates about, among other things, 
the future performance of the underlying assets held by 
the VIE, including investment returns, cash flows, and 
credit and interest rate risks.

Legg Mason’s investment in CIVs as of March 31, 2014 
and 2013 was $39,434 and $39,056, respectively, which 
represents its maximum risk of loss, excluding uncollected 
advisory fees, which were not material. The assets 
of these CIVs are primarily comprised of investment 
securities. Investors and creditors of these CIVs have no 
recourse to the general credit or assets of Legg Mason 
beyond its investment in these funds.

See Note 17 for additional information about VIEs and VREs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with original 
maturities of 90 days or less.

Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily represents long-term escrow 
deposits and cash collateral required for market hedge 
arrangements. This cash is not available to Legg Mason 
for general corporate use.

Financial Instruments
Substantially all financial instruments are reflected in the 
financial statements at fair value or amounts that approximate 
fair value, except Legg Mason’s long-term debt.

As discussed above in “Consolidation,” seed capital 
investments in proprietary fund products are initially 
consolidated and the individual securities within the 
portfolio are accounted for as trading investments. 
Legg Mason consolidates these products as long as it 
holds a controlling financial interest in the product. Upon 
deconsolidation, which typically occurs after several years, 
Legg Mason accounts for its investments in proprietary 
fund products as equity method investments (further 
described below) if its ownership is between 20% 
and 50%, or it otherwise has the ability to significantly 
influence the financial and operating policies of the 
investee. For partnerships and LLCs, where third-party 
investors may have less ability to influence operations, 
the equity method of accounting is considered if Legg 
Mason’s ownership is greater than 3%. Changes in the 
fair value of proprietary fund products classified as trading 
or equity method investments are recognized in Other 
Non-Operating Income (Expense) on the Consolidated 
Statements of Income (Loss).

Legg Mason generally redeems its investment in 
proprietary fund products when the related product 
establishes a sufficient track record, when third-party 
investments in the related product are sufficient to sustain 
the strategy, or a decision is made to no longer pursue 
the strategy. The length of time Legg Mason holds a 
majority interest in a product varies based on a number of 
factors, such as market demand, market conditions and 
investment performance.

See Notes 3 and 17 for additional information regarding 
Legg Mason’s seed capital investments and the 
determination of whether investments in proprietary fund 
products represent VIEs, respectively.

For equity investments where Legg Mason does not 
control the investee, and where it is not the primary 
beneficiary of a VIE, but can exert significant influence 
over the financial and operating policies of the investee, 
Legg Mason follows the equity method of accounting. 
The evaluation of whether Legg Mason can exert control 
or significant influence over the financial and operational 
policies of an investee requires significant judgment 

65

Legg Masonbased on the facts and circumstances surrounding 
each individual investment. Factors considered in these 
evaluations may include investor voting or other rights, any 
influence Legg Mason may have on the governing board 
of the investee, the legal rights of other investors in the 
entity pursuant to the fund’s operating documents and the 
relationship between Legg Mason and other investors in 
the entity. Substantially all of Legg Mason’s equity method 
investees are investment companies which record their 
underlying investments at fair value. Therefore, under the 
equity method of accounting, Legg Mason’s share of the 
investee’s underlying net income or loss predominantly 
represents fair value adjustments in the investments held 
by the equity method investee. Legg Mason’s share of 
the investee’s net income or loss is based on the most 
current information available and is recorded as a net 
gain (loss) on investments within Non-Operating Income 
(Expense). A significant portion of earnings (losses) 
attributable to Legg Mason’s equity method investments 
has offsetting compensation expense adjustments under 
revenue sharing agreements and deferred compensation 
arrangements, therefore, fluctuations in the market value 
of these investments will not have a material impact on 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

Legg Mason also holds debt and marketable equity 
investments which are classified as available-for-sale, 
held-to-maturity or trading. Debt and marketable equity 
securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at 
fair value and resulting unrealized gains and losses are 
reflected in stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests, 
and comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income 
taxes. Debt securities, for which there is positive intent and 
ability to hold to maturity, are classified as held-to-maturity 
and are recorded at amortized cost. Amortization of 
discount or premium is recorded under the interest method 
and is included in interest income. Certain investment 
securities, including those held by CIVs, are classified 
as trading securities. These investments are recorded at 
fair value and unrealized gains and losses are included in 
current period earnings. Realized gains and losses for all 
investments are included in current period earnings.

Equity and fixed income securities classified as trading or 
available-for-sale are valued using closing market prices 
for listed instruments or broker price quotations, when 
available. Fixed income securities may also be valued 
using valuation models and estimates based on spreads to 
actively traded benchmark debt instruments with readily 
available market prices.

Legg Mason evaluates its non-trading investment securities 
for “other-than-temporary” impairment. Impairment may 
exist when the fair value of an investment security has  

been below the adjusted cost for an extended period 
of time. If an “other-than-temporary” impairment is 
determined to exist, the amount of impairment that relates 
to credit losses is recognized as a charge to income. As of 
March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the amount of temporary 
unrealized losses for investment securities not recognized  
in income was not material.

For investments in illiquid or privately-held securities for 
which market prices or quotations may not be readily 
available, including certain investments held by CIVs, 
management estimates the value of the securities using 
a variety of methods and resources, including the most 
current available financial information for the investment 
and the industry.

In addition to the financial instruments described above 
and the derivative instruments and CLO loans, bonds and 
debt, described below, other financial instruments that 
are carried at fair value or amounts that approximate fair 
value include Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term 
borrowings. The fair values of Long-term debt at March 
31, 2014 and 2013, aggregated $1,135,103 and $1,206,166, 
respectively. These fair values were estimated using 
publicly quoted market prices or discounted cash flow 
analyses, as appropriate, and were classified as Level 2 in 
the fair value hierarchy, as described below.

Derivative Instruments
The fair values of derivative instruments are recorded as 
assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 
Legg Mason has used foreign exchange forwards and 
interest rate swaps to hedge the risk of movement in 
exchange rates or interest rates on financial assets and 
liabilities on a limited basis. Also, Legg Mason has used 
futures contracts on index funds to hedge the market risk 
of certain seed capital investments. In addition, certain 
CIVs use derivative instruments. However, there is no 
risk to Legg Mason in relation to the derivative assets and 
liabilities of the CIVs in excess of its investment in the 
funds, if any.

Legg Mason has not designated any financial instruments 
for hedge accounting, as defined in the accounting 
literature, during the periods presented. The gains or 
losses on derivative instruments not designated for hedge 
accounting are included as Other income (expense) or 
Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) in the Consolidated 
Statements of Income (Loss), with the exception of gains 
and losses on derivative instruments of CIVs, which 
are recorded as Other non-operating income (loss) of 
consolidated investment vehicles, net, in the Consolidated 
Statements of Income (Loss).

66

Legg MasonFair Value Measurements
Accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines 
fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair 
value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that 
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability 
in the principal or most advantageous market for the 
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market 
participants on the measurement date. Under accounting 
guidance, a fair value measurement should reflect all of 
the assumptions that market participants would use in 
pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about 
the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the 
effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset, and 
the risk of non-performance.

The objective of fair value accounting measurements is 
to reflect, at the date of the financial statements, how 
much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction 
(as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) under 
current market conditions. Specifically, it requires the 
use of judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market 
has become inactive and in determining fair values when 
markets have become inactive. This accounting guidance 
also relates to other-than-temporary impairments and 
is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing 
of impairment recognition. It is also intended to provide 
greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit 
components of impaired debt securities that are not 
expected to be sold. The guidance also requires timely 
disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, 
and an aging of securities with unrealized losses.

Fair value accounting guidance also establishes a hierarchy 
that prioritizes the inputs for valuation techniques used 
to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the 
highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for 
identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to 
unobservable inputs.

Legg Mason’s financial instruments are measured and 
reported at fair value and are classified and disclosed in 
one of the following categories:

Level 1—Financial instruments for which prices are 
quoted in active markets, which, for Legg Mason, 
include investments in publicly traded mutual funds 
with quoted market prices and equities listed in  
active markets.

Level 2—Financial instruments for which: prices 
are quoted for similar assets and liabilities in active 
markets; prices are quoted for identical or similar 
assets in inactive markets; or prices are based on 
observable inputs, other than quoted prices, such 

as models or other valuation methodologies. For 
Legg Mason, this category may include fixed income 
securities and certain proprietary fund products. 
This category also includes CLO loans and derivative 
liabilities of a CIV.

Level 3—Financial instruments for which values  
are based on unobservable inputs, including those  
for which there is little or no market activity. This 
category includes investments in partnerships, limited 
liability companies, private equity funds and CLO  
debt of a CIV. This category may also include certain 
proprietary fund products with redemption restrictions.

The valuation of an asset or liability may involve inputs from 
more than one level of the hierarchy. The level in the fair 
value hierarchy in which a fair value measurement falls in its 
entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that 
is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Certain proprietary fund products and investments held by 
CIVs are valued at net asset value (“NAV”) determined by 
the applicable fund administrator. These funds are typically 
invested in exchange traded investments with observable 
market prices. Their valuations may be classified as 
Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 based on whether the fund 
is exchange traded, the frequency of the related NAV 
determinations and the impact of redemption restrictions. 
For investments in illiquid and privately-held securities 
(private equity and investment partnerships) for which 
market prices or quotations may not be readily available, 
including certain investments held by CIVs, management 
must estimate the value of the securities using a variety 
of methods and resources, including the most current 
available financial information for the investment and the 
industry to which it applies in order to determine fair value. 
These valuation processes for illiquid and privately-held 
securities inherently require management’s judgment and 
are therefore classified in Level 3.

The fair values of CLO loans and bonds are determined 
based on prices from well-recognized third-party pricing 
services that utilize available market data and are therefore 
classified as Level 2. Legg Mason has established controls 
designed to assess the reasonableness of the prices 
provided. The fair value of CLO debt is valued using 
a discounted cash flow methodology. Inputs used to 
determine the expected cash flows include assumptions 
about forecasted default and recovery rates that a market 
participant would use in determining the fair value of the 
CLO’s underlying collateral assets. Given the significance 
of the unobservable inputs to the fair value measurement, 
the CLO debt valuation is classified as Level 3.

67

Legg MasonExchange traded options are valued using the last sale 
price or, in the absence of a sale, the last offering price. 
Options traded over the counter are valued using dealer 
supplied valuations. Options are classified as Level 1. 
Futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price at 
the end of each day on the exchange upon which they are 
traded and are classified as Level 1.

As a practical expedient, Legg Mason relies on the NAV 
of certain investments, classified as Level 2 or Level 3, 
as their fair value. The NAVs that have been provided by 
investees are derived from the fair values of the underlying 
investments as of the reporting date.

Any transfers between categories are measured at the 
beginning of the period.

See Note 3 for additional information regarding fair  
value measurements.

Fair Value Option
Legg Mason has elected the fair value option for certain 
eligible assets and liabilities, including corporate loans 
and debt, of a CLO it is consolidating (see Note 17). 
Management believes that the use of the fair value option 
mitigates the impact of certain timing differences and 
better matches the changes in fair value of assets and 
liabilities related to the CLO. Unrealized gains and losses 
on assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has 
been elected are reported in earnings. The decision to 
elect the fair value option is determined on an instrument 
by instrument basis, must be applied to an entire 
instrument, and is irrevocable once elected. Assets and 
liabilities which are measured at fair value pursuant to the 
fair value option are included in the assets and liabilities 
of consolidated investment vehicles in the Consolidated 
Balance Sheets. At this time, the Company has not 
elected to apply the fair value option to any of its other 
financial instruments.

Appropriated Retained Earnings
Upon the election of the fair value option for eligible assets 
and liabilities of the CLO described above, Legg Mason 
recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to Appropriated 
retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle on 
the Consolidated Balance Sheets equal to the difference 
between the fair values of the CLO’s assets and liabilities. 
This difference is recorded as “Appropriated retained 
earnings for consolidated investment vehicle” because the 
investors in the CLO, not Legg Mason shareholders, will 
ultimately realize any benefits or losses associated with 
the CLO. Changes in the fair values of the CLO assets and 
liabilities are recorded as Net income (loss) attributable to 
noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statements 
of Income (Loss) and Appropriated retained earnings 

for consolidated investment vehicle in the Consolidated 
Balance Sheets. At March 31, 2014, the CLO is in the 
final stage of liquidation, and the fair value of its assets 
and liabilities are substantially equal, and there is no 
Appropriated retained earnings.

Fixed Assets
Fixed assets primarily consist of equipment, software 
and leasehold improvements. Equipment consists 
primarily of communications and technology hardware and 
furniture and fixtures. Software includes both purchased 
software and internally developed software. Fixed assets 
are reported at cost, net of accumulated depreciation 
and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are 
determined by use of the straight-line method. Equipment 
is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the 
assets, generally ranging from three to eight years. 
Software is amortized over the estimated useful lives of 
the assets, which are generally three years. Leasehold 
improvements are amortized or depreciated over the initial 
term of the lease unless options to extend are likely to be 
exercised. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed 
as incurred. Internally developed software is reviewed 
periodically to determine if there is a change in the useful 
life, or if an impairment in value may exist. If impairment is 
deemed to exist, the asset is written down to its fair value 
or is written off if the asset is determined to no longer 
have any value.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Legg Mason’s identifiable intangible assets consist 
principally of asset management contracts, contracts 
to manage proprietary mutual funds or funds-of-hedge 
funds, and trade names resulting from acquisitions. 
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated 
useful lives, using the straight-line method, unless the 
asset is determined to have an indefinite useful life. Asset 
management contracts are amortizable intangible assets 
that are capitalized at acquisition and amortized over the 
expected life of the contract. The value of contracts to 
manage assets in proprietary mutual funds or funds-of-
hedge funds and the value of trade names are classified 
as indefinite-life intangible assets. The assignment of 
indefinite lives to proprietary fund contracts is based upon 
the assumption that there is no foreseeable limit on the 
contract period to manage proprietary funds due to the 
likelihood of continued renewal at little or no cost. The 
assignment of indefinite lives to trade names is based on 
the assumption that they are expected to generate cash 
flows indefinitely.

Goodwill represents the residual amount of acquisition 
cost in excess of identified tangible and intangible assets 
and assumed liabilities. Indefinite-life intangible assets 

68

Legg Masonand goodwill are not amortized for financial statement 
purposes. Given the relative significance of intangible 
assets and goodwill to the Company’s consolidated 
financial statements, on a quarterly basis Legg Mason 
considers if triggering events have occurred that may 
indicate that the fair values have declined below their 
respective carrying amounts. Triggering events may 
include significant adverse changes in the Company’s 
business, legal or regulatory environment, loss of key 
personnel, significant business dispositions, or other 
events, including changes in economic arrangements 
with our affiliates that will impact future operating results. 
If a triggering event has occurred, the Company will 
perform quantitative tests, which include critical reviews 
of all significant factors and assumptions, to determine 
if any intangible assets or goodwill are impaired. Legg 
Mason considers factors such as projected cash flows 
and revenue multiples, to determine whether the 
value of the assets is impaired and the indefinite-life 
assumptions are appropriate. If an asset is impaired, the 
difference between the value of the asset reflected on 
the consolidated financial statements and its current fair 
value is recognized as an expense in the period in which 
the impairment is determined. If a triggering event has 
not occurred, the Company performs quantitative tests 
annually at December 31, for indefinite-life intangible 
assets and goodwill, unless the Company can qualitatively 
conclude that it is more likely than not that the respective 
fair values exceed the related carrying values. The fair 
values of intangible assets subject to amortization are 
considered for impairment at each reporting period 
using an undiscounted cash flow analysis. For intangible 
assets with indefinite lives, fair value is determined from 
a market participant’s perspective based on projected 
discounted cash flows, which take into consideration 
estimates of future fees, profit margins, growth rates, 
taxes, and discount rates. Proprietary fund contracts that 
are managed and operated as a single unit and meet 
other criteria may be aggregated for impairment testing. 
Goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level, and is 
considered for impairment when the carrying value of 
the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the 
reporting unit. In estimating the implied fair value of the 
reporting unit, Legg Mason uses valuation techniques 
principally based on discounted projected cash flows 
and EBITDA multiples, similar to techniques employed 
in analyzing the purchase price of an acquisition. 
Goodwill is deemed to be recoverable at the reporting 
unit level, which is also the operating segment level that 
Legg Mason defines as the Global Asset Management 
segment. This results from the fact that the chief 
operating decision maker, Legg Mason’s Chief Executive 
Officer, regularly receives discrete financial information 

at the consolidated Global Asset Management business 
level and does not regularly receive discrete financial 
information, such as operating results, at any lower level, 
such as the asset management affiliate level. Allocations 
of goodwill for management restructures, acquisitions 
and dispositions are based on relative fair values of the 
respective businesses restructured, added to or sold from 
the divisions.

See Note 5 for additional information regarding intangible 
assets and goodwill and Note 16 for additional business 
segment information.

Translation of Foreign Currencies
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries that are 
denominated in non-U.S. dollar functional currencies 
are translated at exchange rates as of the Consolidated 
Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are 
translated at average exchange rates during the period. 
The gains or losses resulting from translating foreign 
currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included 
in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income 
(loss). Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency 
transactions are included in Net Income (Loss).

Investment Advisory Fees
Legg Mason earns investment advisory fees on assets 
in separately managed accounts, investment funds, and 
other products managed for Legg Mason’s clients. These 
fees are primarily based on predetermined percentages 
of the market value of the assets under management 
(“AUM”), are recognized over the period in which services 
are performed and may be billed in advance of the period 
earned based on AUM at the beginning of the billing 
period in accordance with the related advisory contracts. 
Revenue associated with advance billings is deferred and 
included in Other (current) liabilities in the Consolidated 
Balance Sheets and is recognized over the period earned. 
Performance fees may be earned on certain investment 
advisory contracts for exceeding performance benchmarks 
on a relative or absolute basis, depending on the product, 
and are recognized at the end of the performance 
measurement period. Accordingly, neither advanced 
billings nor performance fees are subject to reversal. The 
largest portion of performance fees are earned based 
on 12-month performance periods that end in differing 
quarters during the year, with a portion also based on 
quarterly performance periods.

Legg Mason has responsibility for the valuation of AUM, 
substantially all of which is based on observable market 
data from independent pricing services, fund accounting 
agents, custodians or brokers.

69

Legg MasonDistribution and Service Fees Revenue and Expense
Distribution and service fees represent fees earned from 
funds to reimburse the distributor for the costs of marketing 
and selling fund shares and servicing proprietary funds and 
are generally determined as a percentage of client assets. 
Reported amounts also include fees earned from providing 
client or shareholder servicing, including record keeping or 
administrative services to proprietary funds. Distribution 
fees earned on company-sponsored investment funds 
are reported as revenue. When Legg Mason enters into 
arrangements with broker-dealers or other third parties 
to sell or market proprietary fund shares, distribution 
and servicing expense is accrued for the amounts owed 
to third parties, including finders’ fees and referral fees 
paid to unaffiliated broker-dealers or introducing parties. 
Distribution and servicing expense also includes payments 
to third parties for certain shareholder administrative services 
and sub-advisory fees paid to unaffiliated asset managers.

Deferred Sales Commissions
Commissions paid to financial intermediaries in connection 
with sales of certain classes of company-sponsored mutual 
funds are capitalized as deferred sales commissions. The 
asset is amortized over periods not exceeding six years, 
which represent the periods during which commissions 
are generally recovered from distribution and service fee 
revenues and from contingent deferred sales charges 
(“CDSC”) received from shareholders of those funds upon 
redemption of their shares. CDSC receipts are recorded 
as distribution and service fee revenue when received and 
a reduction of the unamortized balance of deferred sales 
commissions, with a corresponding expense.

Management periodically tests the deferred sales 
commission asset for impairment by reviewing the changes 
in value of the related shares, the relevant market conditions 
and other events and circumstances that may indicate an 
impairment in value has occurred. If these factors indicate 
an impairment in value, management compares the 
carrying value to the estimated undiscounted cash flows 
expected to be generated by the asset over its remaining 
life. If management determines that the deferred sales 
commission asset is not fully recoverable, the asset will be 
deemed impaired and a loss will be recorded in the amount 
by which the recorded amount of the asset exceeds its 
estimated fair value. For the years ended March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012, no impairment charges were recorded. 
Deferred sales commissions, included in Other non-current 
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $8,031 
and $8,259 at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects 
of temporary differences between the tax basis of an 
asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial 
statements. Deferred income tax assets are subject to a 
valuation allowance if, in management’s opinion, it is more 
likely than not that these benefits will not be realized. Legg 
Mason’s deferred income taxes principally relate to net 
operating loss and other carryforward benefits, business 
combinations, amortization of intangible assets and 
accrued compensation.

Under applicable accounting guidance, a tax benefit should 
only be recognized if it is more likely than not that the 
position will be sustained based on its technical merits. 
A tax position that meets this threshold is measured 
as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 
50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement by the 
appropriate taxing authority having full knowledge of all 
relevant information.

The Company’s accounting policy is to classify interest 
related to tax matters as interest expense and related 
penalties, if any, as other operating expense.

See Note 7 for additional information regarding income taxes.

Loss Contingencies
Legg Mason accrues estimates for loss contingencies 
related to legal actions, investigations, and proceedings, 
exclusive of legal fees, when it is probable that a liability 
has been incurred and the amount of loss can be 
reasonably estimated. Related insurance recoveries are 
recorded separately when the underwriter has confirmed 
coverage of a specific claim amount. See Note 8 for 
additional information.

Stock-Based Compensation
Legg Mason’s stock-based compensation includes stock 
options, an employee stock purchase plan, market-based 
performance shares payable in common stock, restricted 
stock awards and units, management equity plans for certain 
affiliates and deferred compensation payable in stock. Under 
its stock compensation plans, Legg Mason issues equity 
awards to directors, officers, and other key employees.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, 
compensation expense includes costs for all non-vested 
share-based awards classified as equity at their grant date 
fair value amortized over the respective vesting periods on 
the straight-line method. Legg Mason determines the fair 
value of stock options and affiliate management equity plan 
grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the 
exception of market-based performance grants, which are 

70

Legg Masonvalued with a Monte Carlo option-pricing model. See “Other 
Developments” below and Note 11 for additional information 
regarding stock-based compensation.

Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 
common shareholders (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. by 
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. The 
calculation of weighted-average shares includes common 
shares, shares exchangeable into common stock and 
certain unvested share-based payment awards that are 
considered participating securities because they contain 
nonforfeitable rights to dividends. Diluted EPS is similar to 
basic EPS, but adjusts for the effect of potential common 
shares unless they are antidilutive. For periods with a net 
loss, potential common shares are considered antidilutive. 
See Note 12 for additional discussion of EPS.

Restructuring Costs
In May 2010, Legg Mason’s management committed to  
a plan to streamline its business model as further described 
in Note 15. The streamlining initiative was completed 
as of March 31, 2012. The costs associated with this 
initiative primarily related to employee termination benefits, 
incentives to retain employees during the transition period, 
charges for consolidating leased office space, and contract 
termination costs. Termination benefits, including severance 
and retention incentives, were recorded as Transition-
related compensation in the Consolidated Statements 
of Income (Loss). These compensation items required 
employees to provide future service and were therefore 
expensed ratably over the required service period. Contract 
termination and other costs were expensed when incurred.

As further discussed in Note 2, in March 2014, Legg Mason 
entered into a definitive agreement to acquire QS Investors 
Holdings, LLC (“QS Investors”). Legg Mason plans to 
integrate its two existing affiliates, Batterymarch Financial 
Management, Inc. (“Batterymarch”) and Legg Mason 
Global Asset Allocation, LLC (“LMGAA”) into QS Investors 
over time to leverage the best aspects of each subsidiary. 
The costs anticipated with this integration primarily relate 
to employee termination benefits, including severance and 
retention incentives, which are recorded as Compensation 
and benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Income 
(Loss). See Note 2 for additional information.

Other Developments
In conjunction with the December 2012 modification 
of employment and other arrangements with certain 
employees of its subsidiary, The Permal Group, Ltd 
(“Permal”), Legg Mason completed implementation of a 

management equity plan during the quarter ended June 
30, 2013. On March 31, 2014, a similar management 
equity plan was implemented by Legg Mason for 
certain employees of ClearBridge Investments, LLC 
(“ClearBridge”). The plans better align the interests of 
each affiliate’s management with those of Legg Mason 
and its shareholders, and provide for, among other things, 
higher margins at specified higher revenue levels. The 
management equity plans entitle certain key employees 
of each affiliate to participate in 15% of the future growth, 
if any, of the respective affiliates’ enterprise value (subject 
to appropriate discounts) subsequent to the date of grant. 
Current and future grants under the plans vest 20% 
annually for five years, over which the related grant-date 
fair values will be recognized as Compensation expense 
in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Once vested, 
plan units can be put to Legg Mason for settlement at 
fair value, beginning one year after the holder terminates 
their employment. Legg Mason can also call plan units, 
generally post employment, for settlement at fair value. 
Changes in control of Legg Mason or either affiliate do not 
impact vesting, settlement or other provisions of the units. 
However, upon sale of substantially all of the affiliate’s 
assets, the vesting of the respective units would accelerate 
and participants would receive a fair value payment in 
respect of their interests under the plan. Future grants of 
additional plan units will dilute the participation of existing 
outstanding units in 15% of the future growth of the 
respective affiliates’ enterprise value, if any, subsequent 
to the related future grant date, for which additional 
compensation expense would be incurred. Further, future 
grants under either plan will not entitle the plan participants, 
collectively, to more than an aggregate 15% of the future 
growth of the respective affiliate’s enterprise value. Upon 
vesting, the grant-date fair value of vested plan units 
will be reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as 
redeemable noncontrolling interests through an adjustment 
to additional paid-in capital. Thereafter, redeemable 
noncontrolling interests will continue to be adjusted to the 
ultimate maximum estimated redemption value over the 
expected term, through retained earnings adjustments. See 
Note 11 for additional information. 

Noncontrolling Interests
For CIVs with third-party investors, the related 
noncontrolling interests are classified as redeemable 
noncontrolling interests if investors in these funds 
may request withdrawals at any time. Also included 
in redeemable noncontrolling interests are vested 
affiliate management equity plan units. There are no 
nonredeemable noncontrolling interests as of March 
31, 2014 or 2013. As noted above, Net income (loss) 
attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated 

71

Legg MasonStatements of Income (Loss) also includes Net income 
(loss) reclassified to Appropriated retained earnings for 

consolidated investment vehicle in the Consolidated 
Balance Sheets. 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, included the 
following amounts:

Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

Net Income (loss) reclassified to Appropriated retained earnings  

for consolidated investment vehicle

Total

2014

$  1,881

(4,829)

$(2,948)

 2013

$     971

(7,392)

$(6,421)

 2012

$  8,915

1,299

$10,214

Redeemable noncontrolling interests as of and for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, included the following amounts:

Balance, beginning of period

Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

Net (redemptions/distributions paid to)/subscriptions received  

from noncontrolling interest holders

Management equity plan interests

Balance, end of period

Recent Accounting Developments
In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board 
(“FASB”) updated the guidance for investment company 
entities. The update clarifies the characteristics of an 
investment company, provides comprehensive guidance 
for assessing whether an entity is an investment 
company, requires an investment company to measure 
noncontrolling ownership interests in other investment 
companies at fair value rather than using the equity 
method, and requires additional disclosures. This update 
will be effective for Legg Mason in fiscal 2015. Legg 
Mason is currently evaluating its adoption and it is not 
expected to have a material impact on Legg Mason’s 
consolidated financial statements.

In December 2013, the FASB ratified an Emerging Issues 
Task Force (“EITF”) consensus that will update the 
guidance on measuring the financial assets and financial 
liabilities of consolidated collateralized financing entities. 
The update will require that an entity electing to apply the 
guidance should measure both the financial assets and 
financial liabilities using the fair value of the consolidated 
collateralized financing entity’s financial assets or financial 
liabilities, whichever is more observable. Subject to formal 
issuance by the FASB, this update will also require certain 
disclosures by entities that apply its provisions and will be 
effective for Legg Mason in fiscal 2016, unless adopted 
earlier. Legg Mason is evaluating its adoption.

2014

$21,009

1,881

20,438

1,816

$45,144

 2013

$24,031

971

(3,993)

—

2012

$  36,712

8,915

(21,596)

—

$21,009

$ 24,031

2.  ACQUISITIONS

Fauchier Partners Management, Limited
On March 13, 2013, Permal, a wholly-owned subsidiary 
of Legg Mason, completed the acquisition of all of 
the outstanding share capital of Fauchier Partners 
Management, Limited (“Fauchier”), a European based 
manager of funds-of-hedge funds, from BNP Paribas 
Investment Partners, S.A. in accordance with a Sale and 
Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) entered into in December 
2012. This transaction significantly expands Permal’s 
institutional business, creating a global institutional 
capability across geographies and client profiles. At 
the time of acquisition, Fauchier managed assets of 
approximately $5,400,000. 

The initial purchase price was a cash payment of $63,433, 
using the exchange rate between the British pound 
and U.S. dollar at the acquisition date, and was funded 
from existing cash resources. In addition, contingent 
consideration of up to approximately $25,000 and 
approximately $33,000 (using the exchange rate between 
the British pound and the U.S. dollar as of March 31, 
2014) may be due on or about the second and fourth 
anniversaries of closing, respectively, dependent on 
achieving certain levels of revenue, net of distribution 
costs, and subject to a potential catch-up adjustment in 
the fourth anniversary payment for any second anniversary 

72

Legg Masonpayment shortfall. The contingent consideration liability 
established at closing had an acquisition date fair value 
of $21,566, which represented the present value of the 
contingent consideration expected to be paid. As of March 
31, 2014, the fair value of the contingent consideration 
liability was $29,553, an increase of $7,653 from March 
31, 2013, with $5,000 attributable to revised estimates of 
amounts that will be payable and $2,653 attributable to 
changes in the exchange rate and interest amortization. 
The contingent consideration liability is included in Other 
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The increase 
in the contingent consideration liability due to revised 
estimates of amounts that will be payable was recorded in 
Other expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income 
(Loss) for the year ended March 31, 2014. Legg Mason 
has executed currency forwards to economically hedge 
the risk of movements in the exchange rate between the 
U.S. dollar and the British pound in which the estimated 
contingent liability payment amounts are denominated. 
See Note 14 for additional information regarding 
derivatives and hedging.

A summary of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets 
acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows:

Cash

Receivables

Amortizable asset management contracts

Indefinite-life fund management contracts

Goodwill

Other current liabilities, net

Contingent consideration

Deferred tax liability

Total net assets acquired

$   8,156

12,174

2,865

65,126

28,983

(16,667)

(21,566)

(15,638)

$ 63,433

The fair value of the amortizable asset management 
contracts is being amortized over a period of six years. 
None of the acquired intangible assets or goodwill are 
deductible for U.K. tax purposes.

Management estimated the fair values of the indefinite-life fund management contracts based upon discounted cash flow 
analyses, and the contingent consideration expected to be paid based upon probability-weighted revenue projections, 
using unobservable market data inputs, which are Level 3 measurements. As is typical with the acquisition of a portion 
of a business from a larger financial services firm with other related operations, Legg Mason expected some initial 
contraction in the acquired business. The significant assumptions used in these analyses at acquisition included projected 
annual cash flows, revenues and discount rates, are summarized as follows:

Indefinite-life fund management contracts

(35)% to 11% (weighted-average - 6%)

Projected Cash Flow Growth Rates

Contingent consideration

Projected Revenue Growth Rates

(16)% to 3% (weighted-average - (5)%)

Discount Rate

16.0%

Discount Rate

2.0%

The revised contingent consideration estimate at 
March 31, 2014, considers the higher level of Fauchier 
performance fees to date and includes various scenarios 
with net revenue growth rates ranging from 0% to 8% 
(weighted-average 2%) and a discount rate of 2.7%.

The Company has not presented pro forma combined 
results of operations for this acquisition because the 
results of operations as reported in the accompanying 
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years 
ended March 31, 2013 or 2012, would not have been 
materially different. The financial results of Fauchier 
included in Legg Mason’s consolidated financial results 
for the year ended March 31, 2014, include revenues of 
$72,088. Fauchier operations have been integrated such 
that the related expenses are not readily identifiable. 

QS Investors, LLC
In March 2014, Legg Mason entered into a definitive 
agreement to acquire QS Investors, a customized solutions 
and global quantitative equities provider with approximately 
$5,000,000 in AUM and nearly $100,000,000 in assets 
under advisement as of March 31, 2014. 

Legg Mason plans to integrate over time two existing 
affiliates, Batterymarch and LMGAA, into QS Investors 
to leverage the best capabilities of each entity. Legg 
Mason will pay an initial purchase price of $11,000. In 
addition, contingent consideration of up to $10,000 and 
$20,000 may be due on or about the second and fourth 
anniversaries of closing, respectively, dependent on the 
achievement of certain net revenue targets, and subject to 
a potential catch-up adjustment in the fourth anniversary 

73

Legg MasonLegg Mason’s available-for-sale investments consist of 
mortgage backed securities, U.S. government and agency 
securities and equity securities. Gross unrealized gains 
and (losses) for investments classified as available-for-sale 
were $203 and $(451), respectively, as of March 31, 2014, 
and $230 and $(188), respectively, as of March 31, 2013.

Legg Mason uses the specific identification method to 
determine the cost of a security sold and the amount 
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive 
income into earnings. The proceeds and gross realized 
gains and losses from sales and maturities of available-for-
sale investments are as follows:

Available-for-sale:

Proceeds

Gross realized gains

Years Ended March 31,

2014

2013

2012

$4,306

—

$5,272

        22

$6,197

          6

Gross realized losses

  (29)

        (43)

        (25)

Legg Mason had no investments classified as held-to-
maturity as of March 31, 2014 and 2013.

payment for any second anniversary payment shortfall. 
The acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 
fiscal 2015. 

In connection with the integration, Legg Mason 
expects to incur restructuring and transition costs of 
approximately $35,000, primarily comprised of charges 
for employee related costs. Charges for restructuring 
and transition costs for the year ended March 31, 2014, 
were approximately $2,500, which primarily represent 
costs for severance and retention incentives, recorded 
in Compensation and benefits in the Consolidated 
Statements of Income (Loss). Legg Mason expects that 
approximately $30,000 of the remaining anticipated costs 
associated with the integration will be incurred in the year 
ending March 31, 2015.

3.   INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUES OF  

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The disclosures below include details of Legg Mason’s 
assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, 
excluding the assets and liabilities of CIVs. See Note 17, 
Variable Interest Entities and Consolidation of Investment 
Vehicles, for information related to the assets and liabilities 
of CIVs that are measured at fair value.

Legg Mason has investments in debt and equity securities 
that are generally classified as trading as described in Note 1. 
Investments as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, are as follows:

Investment securities:

Current investments

Available-for-sale
Other(1)

Total

2014

2013

$467,726

    12,072

            90

$479,888

$371,080

    12,400

            99

$383,579

(1)  Includes investments in private equity securities that do not have readily 

determinable fair values.

The net unrealized and realized gain (loss) for investment 
securities classified as trading was $22,963, $18,260 and 
$(6,063) for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 

74

Legg MasonThe fair values of financial assets and (liabilities) of the Company were determined using the following categories of inputs:

As of March 31, 2014

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets 
(Level 1)

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs  
(Level 3)

Total

$456,631

$         — $        — $   456,631

—

456,631

106,226

106,226

—

—

—

106,226

562,857

109,648

ASSETS:

Cash equivalents(1):

Money market funds

Time deposits and other

Total cash equivalents

Current investments:

Trading investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans(2)

109,648

—

Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other  

trading investments(3)

260,251

75,015

190

335,456

Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation 

plans, proprietary fund products and other investments(4)(5)

Total current investments
Available-for-sale investment securities(6)
Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other(6)
Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs(4)(6)

Derivative assets:

Currency and market hedges

Other investments(6)

Total

LIABILITIES:

Contingent consideration liability(7)

Derivative liabilities:

Currency and market hedges

Total

8,497

378,396

2,048

—

—

3,584

—

14,125

89,140

10,024

2,878

—

—

—

—

190

—

21,586

62,973

—

90

22,622

467,726

12,072

24,464

62,973

3,584

90

$840,659

$208,268

$  84,839

$1,133,766

$         — 

$         — $(29,553)

$    (29,553)

(2,335)

—

—

(2,335)

$   (2,335)

$         — $(29,553)

$    (31,888)

75

Legg MasonAs of March 31, 2013

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets 
(Level 1)

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs  
(Level 3)

Total

$485,776

$          —

$         — $   485,776

—

485,776

177,471

177,471

—

—

—

177,471

663,247

86,583

ASSETS:

Cash equivalents(1):

Money market funds

Time deposits and other

Total cash equivalents

Current investments:

Trading investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans(2)

86,583

—

Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other  

trading investments(3)

Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation 

plans, proprietary fund products and other investments(4)(5)

Total current investments

Available-for-sale investment securities(6)

Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other(6)

Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs(4)(6)

Derivative assets:

Currency and market hedges

Other investments(6)

Total

LIABILITIES:

Contingent consideration liability(7)

Derivative liabilities:

Currency and market hedges

Total

158,846

69,064

246

228,156

12,600

258,029

2,034

761

1,518

1,939

—

43,741

112,805

10,354

2,620

924

—

246

12

27,762

66,338

56,341

371,080

12,400

31,143

68,780

—

—

—

99

1,939

99

$750,057

$304,174

$ 94,457

$1,148,688

$          —

$          —

$(21,900)

$     (21,900)

       (781)

          —

         —

          (781)

$       (781)

$          —

$(21,900)

$    (22,681)

(1)  Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Cash investments in actively traded money market funds 
are measured at NAV and are classified as Level 1. Cash investments in time deposits and other are measured at amortized cost, which approximates fair 
value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization, and are classified as Level 2.

(2)  Primarily mutual funds where there is minimal market risk to the Company as any change in value is primarily offset by an adjustment to compensation 

expense and related deferred compensation liability.

(3)  Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other trading investments consist of approximately 53% and 47% in equity and debt securities, 

respectively, as of March 31, 2014, and approximately 49% and 51% in equity and debt securities, respectively, as of March 31, 2013. 

(4)  Substantially all of Legg Mason’s equity method investments are investment companies which record their underlying investments at fair value. Fair value 
is measured using Legg Mason’s share of the investee’s underlying net income or loss, which is predominately representative of fair value adjustments 
in the investments held by the equity method investee.

(5)  Includes investments under the equity method (which approximate fair value) relating to long-term incentive compensation plans of $14,125 and $43,741 
as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and proprietary fund products and other investments of $8,497 and $12,600 as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, 
respectively, which are classified as Investment securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(6)  Amounts are included in Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for each of the periods presented.
(7)  See Note 2.

76

Legg MasonProprietary fund products include seed capital investments 
made by Legg Mason to fund new investment strategies 
and products. Legg Mason had investments in proprietary 
fund products which totaled $405,918 and $304,713, 
as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are 
substantially comprised of investments in 46 funds and 39 
funds as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, that 
are individually greater than $1,000 and together comprise 
over 90% of the seed capital investment total in each 

period. See Note 1 for additional information regarding 
seed capital investments. 

Substantially all of the above financial instruments where 
valuation methods rely on other than observable market 
inputs as a significant input utilize the equity method, the 
cost method, or NAV practical expedient discussed below, 
such that measurement uncertainty has little relevance.

The changes in financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for 
the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, are presented in the tables below:

Value as of 
March 31, 
2013

Purchases

Sales

Redemptions/ 
Settlements/
Other

Transfers

Realized and 
Unrealized 
Gains/
(Losses), Net

Value as of 
March 31, 
2014

ASSETS:

Trading investments of proprietary 
fund products and other trading 
investments

Investments in partnerships, LLCs  

and other

Equity method investments in 

partnerships and LLCs

Other investments

LIABILITIES:

$      246

$        1

$       —

$       (77)

$ —

$      20

$       190

27,762

—

(731)

(4,869)

66,338

5,154

111

—

(750)

(12)

(9,258)

—

—

—

—

(576)

21,586

1,489

62,973

(9)

90

$ 94,457

$5,155

$(1,493)

$(14,204)

$ —

$    924

$ 84,839

Contingent consideration liability

$(21,900)

$      —

$       —

$         —

$ —

$(7,653)

$(29,553)

ASSETS:

Trading investments of proprietary 
fund products and other trading 
investments

Equity method investments in 
proprietary fund products

Investments in partnerships, LLCs  

and other

Equity method investments in 

partnerships and LLCs

Other investments

LIABILITIES:

Value as of 
March 31, 
2012

Purchases

Sales

Redemptions/
Settlements/
Other

Transfers

Realized and 
Unrealized 
Gains/
(Losses), Net

Value as of 
March 31, 
2013

$           — $      246

$       —

$           —

$ —

$         —

$       246

11,778

28,763

—

—

—

(11,705)

(970)

(1,014)

166,438

2,827

(2,268)

(117,411)

124

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(73)

—

983

27,762

16,752

66,338

(13)

111

$207,103

$   3,073

$(3,238)

$(130,130)

$ —

$17,649

$ 94,457

Contingent consideration liability

$           — $(21,566)

$       —

$           —

$ —

$     (334)

$(21,900)

77

Legg MasonRealized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for 
Level 3 investments are primarily included in Other 
Non-Operating Income (Expense) on the Consolidated 
Statements of Income (Loss). The change in unrealized 
losses for Level 3 investments and liabilities still held at 
the reporting date was $5,210 and $1,229 for the years 
ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Also, 

included in realized and unrealized losses, net, for the year 
ended March 31, 2014, is the change in the fair value of 
the contingent consideration liability. 

There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and 
Level 2 during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

As a practical expedient, Legg Mason relies on the NAV of certain investments as their fair value. The NAVs that have 
been provided by the investees have been derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the respective 
reporting dates. The following table summarizes, as of March 31, the nature of these investments and any related 
liquidation restrictions or other factors which may impact the ultimate value realized:

Category of Investment

Investment Strategy

Funds-of-hedge funds Global macro, fixed income, long/short 

Hedge funds

equity, natural resources, systematic, 
emerging market, European hedge

Fixed income—developed market, event 
driven, fixed income—hedge, relative 
value arbitrage, European hedge

Private equity funds

Long/short equity

Other

Total

Various

Fair Value Determined Using NAV

As of March 31, 2014

March 31,  
2014

$34,771(1)

March 31,  
2013

Unfunded 
Commitments

Remaining  
Term

$38,811(1)

n/a

n/a

19,461

22,759(2)

2,434

24,716

23,763(2)

2,408

$20,000

n/a

5,575

Up to 9 years

n/a

Various(3)

$79,425(4)

$89,698(4)

$25,575

n/a—not applicable
(1)  40% monthly redemption and 60% quarterly redemption as of March 31, 2014. 49% monthly redemption and 51% quarterly redemption as of March 31, 

2013. Any remaining lockup expired in June 2013.

(2)  Liquidations are expected over the remaining term.
(3)  Of this balance, 10% has a remaining term of less than one year and 90% has a remaining term of 19 years.
(4)  Comprised of approximately 31% and 69% of Level 2 and Level 3 assets, respectively, as of March 31, 2014 and 32% and 68% of Level 2 and Level 3 assets, 

respectively, as of March 31, 2013.

There are no current plans to sell any of these investments held as of March 31, 2014.

4.  FIXED ASSETS
The following table reflects the components of fixed 
assets as of March 31:

Equipment

Software

Leasehold improvements

Total cost

Less: accumulated depreciation  

and amortization

Fixed assets, net

2014

2013

$ 147,663

$ 152,065

   249,368

   227,739

   209,747

   222,260

   606,778

   602,064

(417,537)

(400,245)

$ 189,241

$  201,819

Depreciation and amortization expense related to fixed 
assets was $50,531, $73,829 and $74,221 for fiscal 2014, 
2013 and 2012, respectively, and includes accelerated 
depreciation and amortization of $2,542 in fiscal 2014, 

primarily related to various corporate initiatives, $21,020 
in fiscal 2013, related to an initiative to reduce space 
requirements, and $10,256 in fiscal 2012, related to our 
business streamlining initiative.

5. 
INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets are not 
amortized, and the values of other identifiable intangible 
assets are amortized over their useful lives, unless the 
assets are determined to have indefinite useful lives. 
Goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets are analyzed 
to determine if the fair value of the assets exceeds the 
book value. Intangible assets subject to amortization are 
considered for impairment at each reporting period. If the 
fair value is less than the book value, Legg Mason will 
record an impairment charge.

78

Legg MasonThe following table reflects the components of intangible 
assets as of:

March 31,  
2014

March 31,  
2013

Amortizable asset  
  management contracts

Cost

$    207,224

$   208,651

Accumulated amortization

(197,255)

(186,324)

Net

9,969

22,327

Indefinite-life intangible assets

U.S. domestic mutual fund 
management contracts

2,106,351

2,106,351

Permal/Fauchier funds-of-hedge 
fund management contracts

698,104

Other fund management contracts

304,549

Trade names

52,800

692,133

303,951

52,800

Intangible assets, net

3,161,804

3,155,235

$3,171,773

$3,177,562

The change in indefinite-life intangible assets is 
attributable to the impact of foreign currency translation. 
Legg Mason completed its annual impairment testing 
process of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets 
and determined that there was no impairment in the 
value of these assets as of December 31, 2013. As a 
result of uncertainty regarding future market conditions 
and economic results, assessing the fair value of the 
reporting unit and intangible assets requires management 
to exercise significant judgment. The current assessed fair 
value of the indefinite-life domestic mutual funds contracts 
asset related to the Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”) 
acquisition exceeds the carrying value by approximately 
21%. The current assessed fair value of the indefinite-
life funds-of-hedge funds contracts asset related to 
the Permal and Fauchier acquisitions exceeds the 
combined carrying values by approximately 10%. Should 
market performance, flows, or related assets under 
management levels decrease in the near term such that 
cash flow projections deviate from current projections, it 
is reasonably possible that the assets could be deemed 
to be impaired by a material amount. Legg Mason also 
determined that no triggering events occurred as of March 
31, 2014 that would require further impairment testing. 

As part of Legg Mason’s annual impairment testing 
process as of December 31, 2012, the Company 
concluded that the carrying value of two significant 
indefinite-life fund management contract intangible assets 
and a trade name asset exceeded their respective fair 

values, and the assets were impaired by an aggregate 
amount of $734,000. The impairment charges resulted 
from a number of then current trends and factors. These 
factors resulted in a reduction of the projected cash flows 
and Legg Mason’s overall assessment of fair value of the 
assets, such that the fair value of the domestic mutual 
fund management contracts asset, Permal funds-of-hedge 
fund management contracts asset, and Permal trade name 
declined below their carrying values, and accordingly 
were impaired by $396,000, $321,000, and $17,000, 
respectively. Management estimated the fair values of 
the indefinite-life intangible assets based upon discounted 
cash flow analyses using unobservable market data 
inputs, which are Level 3 measurements. The significant 
assumptions used in these cash flow analyses as of 
December 31, 2012, included projected cash flows and 
discount rates, summarized as follows:

Projected Cash Flow 
Growth Rates

Range

Weighted-
Average

Discount 
Rates

Domestic mutual funds 

contracts asset

3% to 9%

6%

14.5%

Permal funds-of-hedge 
funds contracts and  
trade name assets

(1)% to 17%

8%

16.0%

Projected cash flow growth rates for these assets are 
most dependent on product investment performance, 
client AUM flows, and market conditions. Discount rates 
are influenced by changes in market conditions, as well as 
interest rates and other factors. Decreases in the projected 
cash flow growth rates and/or increases in the discount 
rates could result in lower fair value measurements and 
potential additional impairments that could be material.

As of March 31, 2014, amortizable asset management 
contracts are being amortized over a weighted-average 
remaining life of 3.2 years. 

Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five 
fiscal years is as follows:

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Thereafter

Total

$3,381

3,145

2,479

482

482

—

$9,969

79

Legg MasonThe change in the carrying value of goodwill is summarized below:

Balance as of March 31, 2012

Impact of excess tax basis amortization

Business acquisition (see Note 2) 

Other, including changes in foreign exchange rates

Balance as of March 31, 2013

Impact of excess tax basis amortization

Other, including changes in foreign exchange rates

Balance as of March 31, 2014

Gross Book Value

Accumulated 
Impairment

Net Book Value

$2,436,945

$(1,161,900)

$1,275,045

(21,573)

28,983

(13,290)

—

—

—

(21,573)

28,983

(13,290)

2,431,065

(1,161,900)

1,269,165

(21,675)

(6,967)

—

—

(21,675)

(6,967)

$2,402,423

$(1,161,900)

$1,240,523

Legg Mason recognizes the tax benefit of the amortization 
of excess tax basis related to the CAM acquisition. In 
accordance with accounting guidance for income taxes, 
the tax benefit is recorded as a reduction of goodwill and 
deferred tax liabilities as the benefit is realized.

6.   SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS  

AND LONG-TERM DEBT

The disclosures below include details of Legg Mason’s 
debt, excluding the debt of CIVs. See Note 17, Variable 
Interest Entities and Consolidation of Investment Vehicles, 
for information related to the debt of CIVs.

As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason had $750,000 
and $500,000, respectively, of revolving credit facility 
capacity. Pursuant to a capital plan, in June 2012, Legg 
Mason entered into an unsecured credit agreement which 
provided for a $500,000 revolving credit facility and a 
$500,000 term loan, which was repaid in fiscal 2014, 
as further discussed below. The proceeds of the term 
loan were used to repay the $500,000 of outstanding 
borrowings under the previous revolving credit facility, 

which was then terminated. In January 2014, Legg Mason 
entered into a $250,000 incremental borrowing credit 
facility, which was contemplated in, and is in addition to 
the $500,000 revolving credit facility. Both revolving credit 
facilities expire in June 2017. The revolving credit facilities 
have interest rates of LIBOR plus 150 basis points and 
annual commitment fees of 20 basis points. The interest 
rates may change in the future based on changes in Legg 
Mason’s credit ratings. These revolving credit facilities are 
available to fund working capital needs and for general 
corporate purposes. There were no borrowings outstanding 
under either of these facilities as of March 31, 2014 or 2013.

The revolving credit facilities have standard financial 
covenants, including a maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio 
(as defined in the documents) of 2.5 to 1 and minimum 
EBITDA to interest ratio (as defined in the documents) of 
4.0 to 1. As of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason’s net debt to 
EBITDA ratio was 1.2 to 1 and EBITDA to interest expense 
ratio was 12.5 to 1, and therefore, Legg Mason has 
maintained compliance with the applicable covenants.

The accreted value of long-term debt consists of the following:

Current  
Accreted Value

$   645,042

393,784

—

438

1,039,264

438

$1,038,826

March 31, 2014

Unamortized 
Discount

$  4,958

6,216

—

—

11,174

—

$11,174

Maturity  
Amount

$   650,000

400,000

—

438

1,050,438

438

$1,050,000

March 31, 2013

Accreted  
Value

$   644,077

—

500,000

877

1,144,954

50,438

$1,094,516

5.5% senior notes

5.625% senior notes

Five-year amortizing term loan

Other term loans

Subtotal

Less: current portion

Total

80

Legg MasonIn January 2008, Legg Mason sold $1,250,000 of 2.5% 
convertible senior notes (the “Convertible Notes”) due 
2015, which were refinanced in May 2012 pursuant to 
the aforementioned capital plan. The refinancing was 
effected through the issuance of $650,000 of 5.5% senior 
notes (the “5.5% Senior Notes”) due May 2019, the 
net proceeds of which, together with cash on hand and 
$250,000 of additional borrowing under a then existing 
revolving credit facility, were used to repurchase the entire 
$1,250,000 face amount of the Convertible Notes.

5.5% Senior Notes
The $650,000 5.5% Senior Notes due May 2019, were sold 
at a discount of $6,754, which is being amortized to interest 
expense over the seven-year term. The 5.5% Senior Notes 
are subject to certain nonfinancial covenants, including 
provisions relating to dispositions of certain assets, which 
could require a percentage of any related proceeds to be 
applied to accelerated repayments. The 5.5% Senior Notes 
can be redeemed at any time prior to their scheduled 
maturity, in part or in aggregate, at the greater of the related 
principal amount at that time or the sum of the remaining 
scheduled payments discounted at the Treasury rate (as 
defined) plus 0.50%, together with any related accrued and 
unpaid interest. In February 2013, the 5.5% Senior Notes 
were registered to trade publicly, consistent with the terms 
of a registration rights agreement signed in connection 
with the issuance. In addition, under the terms of the 
5.5% Senior Notes, the interest rate paid on these notes 
will increase modestly if Legg Mason’s credit ratings are 
reduced below investment grade.

5.625% Senior Notes
In January 2014, Legg Mason issued $400,000 of 5.625% 
senior notes due 2044 (the “5.625% Senior Notes”), 
the proceeds of which, plus cash on hand, were used to 
repay all $450,000 of outstanding borrowings under the 
five-year term loan entered into in conjunction with the 
unsecured credit agreement noted above. The 5.625% 
Senior Notes were sold at a discount of $6,260 which is 
being amortized to interest expense over the 30-year term. 
The 5.625% Senior Notes can be redeemed at any time 
prior to their scheduled maturity in part or in aggregate, at 
the greater of the related principal amount at that time or 
the sum of the remaining scheduled payments discounted 
at the treasury rate (as defined) plus 0.30%, together with 
any related accrued and unpaid interest.

2.5% Convertible Senior Notes and  
Related Hedge Transactions
Prior to the repurchase of the Convertible Notes in May 
2012, as previously discussed, Legg Mason was accreting 
the carrying value of the Convertible Notes to the principal 

amount at maturity using an interest rate of 6.5% (the 
effective borrowing rate for non-convertible debt at the 
time of issuance) over its expected life of seven years, 
resulting in interest expense of $5,839 and $39,077 for the 
years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The 
Convertible Notes were convertible, if certain conditions 
were met, at an initial conversion rate of 11.3636 shares 
of Legg Mason common stock per one thousand dollar 
principal amount of Convertible Notes (equivalent to a 
conversion price of approximately $88 per share), or 
a maximum of 14,205 shares, subject to adjustment. 
Unconverted notes would mature at par in January 2015. 
Upon conversion of a one thousand dollar principal amount 
note, the holder would receive cash in an amount equal to 
one thousand dollars or, if less, the conversion value of the 
note. If the conversion value exceeded the principal amount 
of the Note at conversion, Legg Mason would also deliver, 
at its election, cash or common stock or a combination of 
cash and common stock for the conversion value in excess 
of one thousand dollars.

In connection with the sale of the Convertible Notes, in 
January 2008, Legg Mason entered into convertible note 
hedge transactions with respect to its common stock 
(the “Purchased Call Options”) with financial institution 
counterparties (“Hedge Providers”). The Purchased Call 
Options were exercisable solely in connection with any 
conversions of the Convertible Notes in the event that the 
market value per share of Legg Mason common stock 
at the time of exercise was greater than the exercise 
price of the Purchased Call Options, which was equal 
to the $88 conversion price of the Convertible Notes, 
subject to adjustment. Simultaneously, in separate 
transactions Legg Mason also sold to the Hedge Providers 
warrants to purchase, in the aggregate and subject to 
adjustment, 14,205 shares of common stock on a net 
share-settled basis at an exercise price of $107.46 per 
share of common stock. The Purchased Call Options and 
warrants were not part of the terms of the Convertible 
Notes and did not affect the holders’ rights under the 
Convertible Notes. These hedging transactions had a 
net cost of approximately $83,000, which was paid from 
the proceeds of the Convertible Notes and recorded as a 
reduction of additional paid-in capital.

These transactions effectively increased the conversion price 
of the Convertible Notes to $107.46 per share of common 
stock. Legg Mason had contractual rights, and, at execution 
of the related agreements, had the ability to settle its 
obligations under the conversion feature of the Convertible 
Notes, the Purchased Call Options and warrants, with Legg 
Mason common stock. Accordingly, these transactions were 
accounted for as equity, with no subsequent adjustment for 
changes in the value of these obligations.

81

Legg MasonThe terms of the repurchase of the Convertible Notes 
in May 2012 noted above included their repayment at 
par plus accrued interest, a prepayment fee of $6,250, 
and a non-cash exchange of warrants (the “Warrants”) 
to the holders of the Convertible Notes that replicated 
and extended the contingent conversion feature of the 
Convertible Notes. The cash payment of $1,256,250 
to repurchase the Convertible Notes was allocated 
between their liability and equity components based on a 
liability fair value of $1,193,971, determined using a then 
current market interest rate of 4.1%, resulting in a loss 
on debt extinguishment of $68,975, including $7,851 of 
accelerated deferred issue costs. The remaining balance of 
the cash payment was allocated to the equity component 
of the Convertible Notes for a $62,279 reduction of 
additional paid-in capital, offset by related tax benefits 
of $31,446. The $1,193,971 amount of cash repurchase 
payment allocated to the liability component of the 
Convertible Notes upon their extinguishment exceeds the 
initial allocated value at issuance of $977,933, requiring 
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year 
ended March 31, 2013 to include an allocation of the 
$216,038 excess to operating activities. 

The Warrants issued to the holders of the Convertible 
Notes in connection with the repurchase of the Convertible 
Notes provide for the purchase, in the aggregate and 
subject to adjustment, of 14,205 shares of Legg Mason 

common stock, on a net share settled basis, at an exercise 
price of $88 per share. Upon exercise of the Warrants, 
Legg Mason will be required to deliver to the holders of the 
Warrants, at its election, either shares of its common stock 
or cash, in an amount based on the excess of the market 
price per share of its common stock over the exercise price 
of the Warrants. The Warrants expire in July 2017. Legg 
Mason has had the option to settle its obligations under the 
Warrants with Legg Mason common stock. Accordingly, 
the Warrants are accounted for as equity.

In connection with the extinguishment of the Convertible 
Notes, the hedge transactions (Purchased Call Options 
and warrants) executed in connection with the initial 
issuance of the Convertible Notes were also terminated.

As of March 31, 2014, the aggregate maturities of  
long-term debt, based on their contractual terms, are  
as follows:

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Thereafter

Total

$          438

—

—

—

—

1,050,000

$1,050,438

82

Legg Mason7.   INCOME TAXES
The components of income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) are as follows:

Domestic

Foreign

Total

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:

Federal

Foreign

State and local

Total income tax provision (benefit)

Current

Deferred

Total income tax provision (benefit)

2014

$320,890

    98,751

$419,641

2013

$(264,342)

  (246,265)

$(510,607)

2012

$257,866

    45,217

$303,083

2014

2013

$125,494

$   (74,185)

(1,450)

13,761

$137,805

$  19,375

118,430

$137,805

(85,677)

9,003

$(150,859)

$     6,496

(157,355)

$(150,859)

2012

$54,179

(7,850)

25,723

$72,052

$22,860

49,192

$72,052

A reconciliation of the difference between the effective income tax (benefit) rate and the statutory federal income tax 
(benefit) rate is as follows:

Tax provision (benefit) at statutory U.S. federal income tax rate
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit(1)
Effect of foreign tax rates(1)

Effect of loss on Australian restructuring

Changes in U.K. tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Other, net(1)

2014

35.0%

1.8

(4.2)

—

(4.6)

0.3

4.5

2013

(35.0)%

2012

35.0%

1.5

3.8

—

(3.5)

0.5

3.2

5.4

(1.8)

(6.0)

(6.0)

(0.8)

(2.0)

Effective income tax (benefit) rate

32.8%

(29.5)%

23.8%

(1)  State income taxes include changes in related valuation allowances, net of the impact on deferred tax assets of changes in state apportionment factors and 
planning strategies. The effect of foreign tax rates also includes changes in related valuation allowances. Other includes changes in federal valuation allow-
ances and permanent tax adjustments. See schedule below for the change in valuation allowances by jurisdiction.

In July 2011, The U.K. Finance Act 2011 (the “Act”) was 
enacted. The Act reduced the main U.K. corporate tax 
rate from 27% to 26% effective April 1, 2011, and from 
26% to 25% effective April 1, 2012. In July 2012, The U.K. 
Finance Act 2012 was enacted, which further reduced 
the main U.K. corporate tax rate to 24% effective April 
1, 2012 and 23% effective April 1, 2013. In July 2013, 
the Finance Bill 2013 was enacted, further reducing the 
main U.K. corporate tax rate to 21% effective April 1, 

2014 and 20% effective April 1, 2015. The reductions 
in the U.K. corporate tax rate resulted in tax benefits of 
$19,164, $18,075 and $18,268, recognized in fiscal 2014, 
2013 and 2012, respectively, as a result of the revaluation 
of deferred tax assets and liabilities at the new rates. In 
addition, during the year ended March 31, 2012, Legg 
Mason recorded $18,254 of tax benefits related to a 
restructuring of our Australian business. 

83

Legg MasonDeferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability 
and its reported amount in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These temporary differences result in taxable or deductible 
amounts in future years. A summary of Legg Mason’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS

Accrued compensation and benefits

Accrued expenses

Operating loss carryforwards

Capital loss carryforwards

Foreign tax credit carryforward

Federal benefit of uncertain tax positions

Mutual fund launch costs

Net unrealized losses from investments

Other

Deferred tax assets

Valuation allowance

2014

2013

$154,074

$ 107,411

61,575

267,940

10,015

235,661

16,914

31,774

—

303

778,256

(90,832)

73,181

449,806

41,256

115,819

21,165

24,324

4,447

5,086

842,495

(115,815)

Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance

$687,424

$ 726,680

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES

Basis differences, principally for intangible assets and goodwill

Depreciation and amortization

Net unrealized gains from investments

Other

Deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax asset

2014

2013

$  72,596

523,595

4,743

221

601,155

$  86,269

$ 134,873

386,959

—

1,528

523,360

$ 203,320

Certain tax benefits associated with Legg Mason’s 
employee stock plans are recorded directly in 
Stockholders’ Equity. No tax benefit was recorded 
to equity in fiscal 2014, 2013 or 2012, due to the net 
operating loss position of the Company. As of March 31, 
2014, an additional $7,424 of net operating loss will be 
recognized as an increase in Stockholders’ Equity when 
ultimately realized.

Legg Mason has various loss carryforwards that may 
provide future tax benefits. Related valuation allowances 
are established in accordance with accounting guidance 
for income taxes, if it is management’s opinion that it 
is more likely than not that these benefits will not be 
realized. Substantially all of Legg Mason’s deferred tax 
assets related to U.S. federal and state and U.K. taxing 
jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2014, U.S. federal deferred 
tax assets aggregated $762,699, realization of which is 
expected to require approximately $3,800,000 of future 
U.S. earnings, approximately $673,317 of which must be 
in the form of foreign source income. Based on estimates 

of future taxable income, using assumptions consistent 
with those used in Legg Mason’s goodwill impairment 
testing, it is more likely than not that current federal tax 
benefits relating to net operating losses are realizable 
and no valuation allowance is necessary at this time. 
With respect to those resulting from foreign tax credits, 
it is more likely than not that tax benefits relating to the 
utilization of $39,919 of foreign tax credits as credits will 
not be realized and an additional valuation allowance of 
$2,340 was provided in fiscal 2014. In addition, a valuation 
allowance was established in prior years for the substantial 
portion of our deferred tax assets relating to U.K. taxing 
jurisdictions. While tax planning may enhance Legg 
Mason’s tax positions, the realization of these current tax 
benefits is not dependent on any significant tax strategies. 

As of March 31, 2014, U.S. state deferred tax assets 
aggregated approximately $180,183. Due to limitations on 
utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and taking 
into consideration certain state tax planning strategies, 
a valuation allowance was established in prior years for 

84

Legg Masonstate net operating loss benefits generated in certain 
jurisdictions. An additional valuation allowance of $8,639 
was established in fiscal 2014 for the additional tax 
benefits generated in these jurisdictions. Additionally, 
$34,831 of fully reserved deferred tax assets relating 
to U.S. state capital loss carryforwards expired unused 
during fiscal 2014. Due to the uncertainty of future state 
apportionment factors and future effective state tax rates, 
the value of state net operating loss benefits ultimately 
realized may vary. 

An increase to the valuation allowance of approximately 
$467 in fiscal 2014 was primarily related to the current 
year change in certain U.K. deferred tax assets for which 
a full valuation allowance was previously recognized. To 
the extent the analysis of the realization of deferred tax 
assets relies on deferred tax liabilities, Legg Mason has 
considered the timing, nature and jurisdiction of reversals, 
as well as, future increases relating to the tax amortization 
of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets. 

The following deferred tax assets and valuation allowances relating to carryforwards have been recorded at March 31, 
2014 and 2013, respectively.

Deferred tax assets

U.S. federal net operating losses

U.S. federal capital losses

U.S. federal foreign tax credits

U.S. charitable contributions

U.S. state net operating losses(1)(2)

U.S. state capital losses

Foreign net operating losses

Foreign capital losses

Total deferred tax assets for carryforwards

Valuation allowances

U.S. federal capital losses

U.S. federal foreign tax credits

U.S. charitable contributions

U.S. state net operating losses

U.S. state capital losses

Foreign net operating losses

Foreign capital losses

Valuation allowances for carryforwards

Foreign other deferred assets

Total valuation allowances

Expires 
Beginning after 
Fiscal Year

2029

2015

2015

2013

2015

2015

2027

n/a

2014

2013

$  80,515

$266,659

3,545

235,661

—

168,173

532

19,252

5,938

74

115,819

5,401

161,136

34,960

22,011

6,222

$513,616

$612,282

$          74

$          74

25,947

—

34,590

129

15,738

5,938

82,416

8,416

23,608

1,597

25,951

34,960

15,899

6,222

108,311

7,504

$  90,832

$115,815

(1)  Substantially all of the U.S. state net operating losses carryforward through fiscal 2029.
(2)  Due to potential  for  change in  the factors relating  to apportionment  of income to various states, the Company’s effective state tax rates are subject to 
fluctuation which will impact the value of the Company’s deferred tax assets, including net operating losses, and could have a material impact on the future 
effective tax rate of the Company.

Legg Mason had total gross unrecognized tax benefits 
of approximately $77,892, $72,650 and $90,831 as of 
March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Of these 
totals, approximately $51,518, $46,340 and $62,400, 
respectively, (net of the federal benefit for state tax 
liabilities) are the amounts of unrecognized benefits which, 

if recognized, would favorably impact future income tax 
provisions and effective tax rates. During fiscal 2014, as 
a result of the net impact of expiring statutes of limitation 
and the completion of tax authority examinations, 
unrecognized benefits of $2,927 were realized. 

85

Legg MasonA reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized gross tax benefits for the years ended March 31, 
2014, 2013 and 2012, is as follows:

Balance, beginning of year

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

Additions for tax positions of prior years

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities

Expiration of statutes of limitations

Balance, end of year

Although management cannot predict with any degree 
of certainty the timing of ultimate resolution of matters 
under review by various taxing jurisdictions, at this time 
the Company does not anticipate any changes to the 
gross unrecognized tax benefits balance within the next 
12 months as a result of the statutes of limitations or the 
completion of tax authorities’ examinations.

The Company accrues interest related to unrecognized 
tax benefits in interest expense and recognizes penalties 
in other operating expense. During the years ended 
March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized 
approximately $(580), $5,500, and $1,300, respectively, 
which was substantially all interest. At March 31, 2014, 2013 
and 2012, Legg Mason had approximately $7,300, $14,000, 
and $10,000, respectively, accrued for interest and penalties 
on tax contingencies in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Legg Mason’s prior year tax returns are subject to 
examination by the Internal Revenue Service, the Inland 
Revenue Service, Brazilian and other tax authorities in 
various other countries and states. The following tax years 
remain open to income tax examination for each of the 
more significant jurisdictions where Legg Mason is subject 
to income taxes: after fiscal 2009 for U.S. federal; after 
fiscal 2012 for the United Kingdom (“U.K.”); after fiscal 
2005 for Brazil; after fiscal 2009 for the state of California; 
after fiscal 2008 for the state of New York; and after 
fiscal 2010 for the states of Connecticut, Maryland and 
Massachusetts. The Company does not anticipate making 
any significant cash payments with the settlement of these 
audits in excess of amounts that have been reserved.

During the year ended March 31, 2014, Legg Mason 
revised its plan and completed repatriation of 
approximately $301,000 of foreign accumulated earnings 
in order to make the cash available in the U.S. for general 
corporate purposes. Due to certain tax planning strategies, 
Legg Mason anticipates that it will generate a benefit 
of approximately $12,000 with respect to repatriations 

2014

 2013

  2012

$ 72,650

$ 90,831

$77,653

5,659

12,610

(138)

(12,889)

—

11,726

8,439

(13,083)

(25,205)

(58)

9,822

10,668

(3,575)

(3,185)

(552)

$  77,892

$ 72,650

$90,831

and has adjusted the tax reserve accordingly. No further 
repatriation of accumulated prior period foreign earnings 
is currently planned. However, if circumstances change, 
Legg Mason will provide for and pay any applicable 
additional U.S. taxes in connection with repatriation of 
these funds. It is not practical at this time to determine 
the income tax liability that would result from any further 
repatriation of accumulated foreign earnings.

Except as noted above, Legg Mason intends to 
permanently reinvest cumulative undistributed earnings of 
its foreign subsidiaries in foreign operations. Accordingly, 
no U.S. federal income taxes have been provided for 
the undistributed earnings to the extent that they are 
permanently reinvested in Legg Mason’s foreign operations. 
It is not practical at this time to determine the income tax 
liability that would result upon repatriation of the earnings.

8.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 
Legg Mason leases office facilities and equipment under 
non-cancelable operating leases, and also has multi-year 
agreements for certain services. These leases and service 
agreements expire on varying dates through fiscal 2026. 
Certain leases provide for renewal options and contain 
escalation clauses providing for increased rentals based 
upon maintenance, utility and tax increases.

As of March 31, 2014, the minimum annual aggregate 
rentals under operating leases and service agreements are 
as follows:

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Thereafter

Total

$134,280

115,694

97,595

87,080

72,879

351,275

$858,803

86

Legg MasonThe minimum rental commitments shown above have 
not been reduced by $172,526 for minimum sublease 
rentals to be received in the future under non-cancelable 
subleases, of which approximately 40% is due from one 
counterparty. The lease reserve liability, included in the 
table below, for space subleased as of March 31, 2014 
was $36,170. If a sub-tenant defaults on a sublease, Legg 
Mason may incur operating charges to adjust the existing 
lease reserve liability to reflect expected future sublease 
rentals at reduced amounts, as a result of the current 
commercial real estate market. 

The above minimum rental commitments include 
$784,221 in real estate and equipment leases and $74,582 
in service and maintenance agreements.

The minimum rental commitments shown above include 
$30,200 for commitments related to space that has been 
vacated, but for which subleases are being pursued. The 
related lease reserve liability, included in the table below, 
was $19,330 as of March 31, 2014, and remains subject 
to adjustment based on circumstances in the real estate 
markets that may require a change in assumptions or 
the actual terms of a sublease that is ultimately secured. 
The lease reserve liability takes into consideration various 
assumptions, including the expected amount of time it will 
take to secure a sublease agreement and prevailing rental 
rates in the applicable real estate markets. 

The table below presents a summary of the changes in 
the lease reserve liability for subleased space and vacated 
space for which subleases are being pursued:

Balance as of March 31, 2011
Accrued charges for vacated and subleased space (1)

Payments, net

Adjustments and other

Balance as of March 31, 2012
Accrued charges for vacated and subleased space (1)

Payments, net

Adjustments and other

Balance as of March 31, 2013
Accrued charges for vacated and subleased space(1)

Payments, net

Adjustments and other

Balance as of March 31, 2014

$ 40,521

17,391

(12,397)

(752)

44,763

39,080

(15,341)

(1,590)

66,912

7,371

(17,117)

(1,666)

$ 55,500

(1)   Included in Occupancy expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income 

(Loss)

The table above includes activity related to our  
business streamlining initiative. See Note 15 for  
additional information.

The following table reflects rental expense under all 
operating leases and servicing agreements.

2014

2013

2012

Rental expense

$130,880

$138,488

$140,285

Less: sublease income

16,289

    14,750

    14,310

Net rent expense

$114,591

$123,738

$125,975

Legg Mason recognizes rent expense ratably over the lease 
period based upon the aggregate lease payments. The 
lease period is determined as the original lease term without 
renewals, unless and until the exercise of lease renewal 
options is reasonably assured, and also includes any period 
provided by the landlord as a “free rent” period. Aggregate 
lease payments include all rental payments specified in 
the contract, including contractual rent increases, and are 
reduced by any lease incentives received from the landlord, 
including those used for tenant improvements.

As of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason had commitments 
to invest approximately $34,536 in limited partnerships 
that make private investments. These commitments are 
expected to be funded as required through the end of the 
respective investment periods ranging through fiscal 2021. 

In connection with the acquisition of Fauchier, as further 
discussed in Note 2, contingent consideration of up 
to approximately $25,000 and approximately $33,000 
(using the exchange rate between the British pound 
and U.S. dollar as of March 31, 2014), may be due on or 
about the second and fourth anniversaries of closing, 
respectively, which is dependent upon achieving certain 
levels of revenue, net of distribution costs, and subject to 
a potential catch-up adjustment in the fourth anniversary 
payment for any second anniversary payment shortfall. 
The fair value of the contingent consideration liability 
was $29,553 as of March 31, 2014, an increase of 
$7,653 from March 31, 2013, with $5,000 attributable 
to revised estimates of amounts payable and $2,653 
attributable to changes in the exchange rate and interest 
amortization. Legg Mason has executed currency forwards 
to economically hedge the risk of movements in the 
exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British 
pound in which the estimated contingent liability payment 
amounts are denominated. See Note 14 for additional 
information regarding derivatives and hedging.

In connection with the acquisition of QS Investors, as 
further discussed in Note 2, Legg Mason will pay an initial 
purchase price of $11,000 and contingent consideration of 
up to $10,000 and $20,000 may be due on or about the 
second and fourth anniversaries of closing, respectively, 
dependent on the achievement of certain net revenue 
targets, and subject to a potential catch-up adjustment in 

87

Legg Masonthe fourth anniversary payment for any second anniversary 
payment shortfall.

In the normal course of business, Legg Mason enters 
into contracts that contain a variety of representations 
and warranties and that provide general indemnifications, 
which are not considered financial guarantees by relevant 
accounting guidance. Legg Mason’s maximum exposure 
under these arrangements is unknown, as this would 
involve future claims that may be made against Legg 
Mason that have not yet occurred.

Legg Mason has been the subject of customer complaints 
and has also been named as a defendant in various legal 
actions arising primarily from securities brokerage, asset 
management and investment banking activities, including 
certain class actions, which primarily allege violations 
of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, 
which could be substantial. In the normal course of its 
business, Legg Mason has also received subpoenas 
and is currently involved in governmental and industry 
self-regulatory agency inquiries, investigations and, from 
time to time, proceedings involving asset management 
activities. In accordance with guidance for accounting for 
contingencies, Legg Mason has established provisions for 
estimated losses from pending complaints, legal actions, 
investigations and proceedings when it is probable that a 
loss has been incurred and a reasonable estimate of loss 
can be made.

In a transaction with Citigroup in December 2005, Legg 
Mason transferred to Citigroup the subsidiaries that 
constituted its Private Client/Capital Markets (“PC/CM”) 
businesses, thus transferring the entities that would 
have primary liability for most of the customer complaint, 
litigation and regulatory liabilities and proceedings 
arising from those businesses. However, as part of that 
transaction, Legg Mason agreed to indemnify Citigroup 
for most customer complaint, litigation and regulatory 
liabilities of Legg Mason’s former PC/CM businesses 
that result from pre-closing events. While the ultimate 
resolution of these matters cannot be determined based 
on current information, after consultation with legal 
counsel, management believes that any accrual or range 
of reasonably possible losses as of March 31, 2014 is not 
material. Similarly, although Citigroup transferred to Legg 
Mason the entities that would be primarily liable for most 
customer complaint, litigation and regulatory liabilities and 
proceedings of the CAM business, Citigroup has agreed 
to indemnify Legg Mason for most customer complaint, 
litigation and regulatory liabilities of the CAM business that 
result from pre-closing events.

One of Legg Mason’s asset management subsidiaries 
was named as the defendant in a lawsuit filed by a former 

institutional client in late August 2011. Legg Mason 
settled this matter in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The 
settlement was substantially covered by insurance and 
did not have a material effect on Legg Mason’s financial 
position, results of operations or cash flows.

Additionally, there were two matters subject to regulatory 
investigations involving one of Legg Mason’s asset 
management subsidiaries regarding its compliance with 
applicable legal requirements with respect to investments 
made for certain client accounts. These matters have 
been settled with the regulators. The settlements were 
substantially covered by insurance and did not have a 
material effect on Legg Mason’s financial position, results 
of operations or cash flows.

Legg Mason cannot estimate the reasonably possible loss 
or range of loss associated with matters of litigation and 
other proceedings, including those described above as 
customer complaints, legal actions, inquiries, proceedings 
and investigations. The inability to provide a reasonably 
possible amount or range of losses is not because there 
is uncertainty as to the ultimate outcome of a matter, but 
because liability and damage issues have not developed 
to the point where Legg Mason can conclude that there 
is both a reasonable possibility of a loss and a meaningful 
amount or range of possible losses. There are numerous 
aspects to customer complaints, legal actions, inquiries, 
proceedings and investigations that prevent Legg Mason 
from estimating a related amount or range of reasonably 
possible losses. These aspects include, among other 
things, the nature of the matters; that significant relevant 
facts are not known, are uncertain or are in dispute; and 
that damages sought are not specified, are uncertain, 
unsupportable or unexplained. In addition, for legal 
actions, discovery may not yet have started, may not 
be complete or may not be conclusive, and meaningful 
settlement discussions may not have occurred. Further, 
for regulatory matters, investigations may run their course 
without any clear indication of wrongdoing or fault until 
their conclusion.

In management’s opinion, an adequate accrual has been 
made as of March 31, 2014, to provide for any probable 
losses that may arise from matters for which the Company 
could reasonably estimate an amount. Legg Mason’s 
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows 
could be materially affected during a period in which a 
matter is ultimately resolved. In addition, the ultimate 
costs of litigation-related charges can vary significantly 
from period-to-period, depending on factors such as 
market conditions, the size and volume of customer 
complaints and claims, including class action suits, and 
recoveries from indemnification, contribution, insurance 

88

Legg Masonreimbursement, or reductions in compensation under 
revenue share arrangements. 

As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason’s liability 
for losses and contingencies was $500 and $20,300, 
respectively. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, Legg 
Mason had charges relating to litigation and other 
proceedings of approximately $200, $5,200, and $1,100, 
respectively (net of recoveries of $19,300 and $15,200 in 
fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively).

9.   EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Legg Mason, through its subsidiaries, maintains various 
defined contribution plans covering substantially all 
employees. Through these plans, Legg Mason can make 
two types of discretionary contributions. One is a profit 
sharing contribution to eligible Plan participants based on 
a percentage of qualified compensation and the other is a 
match of employee 401(k) contributions. Matches range 
from 50% to 100% of employee 401(k) contributions, 
up to a maximum of the lesser of up to 6% of employee 
compensation or a specified amount up to $15 per year. 
Corporate profit sharing and matching contributions, 
together with contributions made under subsidiary plans, 
totaled $29,355, $25,868 and $22,336 in fiscal 2014, 2013 
and 2012, respectively. In addition, employees can make 
voluntary contributions under certain plans.

10.  CAPITAL STOCK
At March 31, 2014, the authorized numbers of common 
and preferred shares were 500,000 and 4,000, 
respectively. At March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were 
10,333 and 11,948 shares of common stock, respectively, 
reserved for issuance under Legg Mason’s equity plans. 

In May 2012, as part of a capital plan, Legg Mason’s 
Board of Directors authorized $1,000,000 for additional 
purchases of Legg Mason common stock, as well as the 
completion of the remaining $155,000 of a previously 
authorized share repurchase program. There is no 
expiration date attached to this authorization. During fiscal 
2014, Legg Mason purchased and retired 9,677 shares 
of its common stock for $359,996 through open market 
purchases. During fiscal 2013, Legg Mason purchased and 
retired 16,199 shares of its common stock for $425,475 
through open market purchases, which completed the 
repurchase of its common stock under the previous 
authorization, and began purchases under the new 
authorization. The remaining balance of the authorized 
stock buyback is approximately $370,000.

In May 2008, Legg Mason issued $1,150,000 of Equity 
Units, each unit consisting of a 5% interest in one 
thousand dollar principal amount of senior notes due June 
30, 2021, and a purchase contract committing the holder 
to purchase shares of Legg Mason’s common stock by 
June 30, 2011. During fiscal 2012, Legg Mason issued 
1,830 shares of Legg Mason common stock upon the 
exercise of the purchase contracts from the remaining 
Equity Units and the senior notes from the Equity Units 
were retired in a remarketing. 

As discussed in Note 6, warrants issued in connection 
with the repurchase of the Notes could result in the 
issuance of a maximum of 14,205 shares of Legg Mason 
common stock, subject to adjustment, if certain conditions 
are met.

Changes in common stock for the three years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are as follows:

COMMON STOCK

Beginning balance

Shares issued for:

Stock option exercises and other stock-based compensation

Deferred compensation employee stock trust

Deferred compensation, net

Shares repurchased and retired

Employee tax withholding by settlement of net share transactions

Equity Units exchanged

Ending balance

Years Ended March 31,

2014

2013

2012

125,341

139,874

150,219

839

50

1,175

(9,677)

(555)

—

80

71

1,925

(16,199)

(410)

—

117,173

125,341

172

68

1,246

(13,597)

(64)

1,830

139,874

89

Legg Mason 
Dividends declared per share were $0.52, $0.44 and $0.32 
for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Dividends 
declared but not paid at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 
were $14,945, $14,185 and $11,493, respectively, and are 
included in Other current liabilities.

11.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Legg Mason’s stock-based compensation includes stock 
options, an employee stock purchase plan, market-based 
performance shares payable in common stock, restricted 
stock awards and units, management equity plans and 
deferred compensation payable in stock. Effective July 
26, 2011, the number of shares authorized to be issued 
under Legg Mason’s active equity incentive stock plan 

was increased by 6,500 to 41,500. Shares available for 
issuance under the active equity incentive stock plan as of 
March 31, 2014, were 9,740. Options under Legg Mason’s 
employee stock plans have been granted at prices not less 
than 100% of the fair market value. Options are generally 
exercisable in equal increments over four to five years and 
expire within eight to ten years from the date of grant.

Stock Options
Compensation expense relating to stock options for the 
years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, was $13,530, 
$10,979 and $14,076, respectively. The related income tax 
benefit for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 
was $5,244, $4,293 and $5,539, respectively. 

Stock option transactions under Legg Mason’s equity incentive plans during the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 
2012 are summarized below:

Options outstanding at March 31, 2011

Granted

Exercised

Canceled/forfeited

Options outstanding at March 31, 2012

Granted

Exercised

Canceled/forfeited

Options outstanding at March 31, 2013

Granted

Exercised

Canceled/forfeited

Options outstanding at March 31, 2014

Number  
of Shares

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price  
Per Share

5,419

810

(117)

(488)

5,624

966

(25)

(1,204)

5,361

1,215

(804)

(971)

4,801

$59.82

33.99

25.32

48.80

57.78

23.72

21.80

51.87

53.13

33.64

30.52

97.49

$43.02

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, was $6,064, $168 
and $398, respectively. At March 31, 2014, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $72,724.

The following information summarizes Legg Mason’s stock options outstanding at March 31, 2014: 

Exercise Price Range

$  12.65–$   25.00

    25.01–     35.00

    35.01–     94.00

    94.01–   100.00

  100.01–   134.97

Option Shares 
Outstanding

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price  
Per Share

Weighted-Average 
Remaining Life  
(in years)

846

2,403

681

416

455

4,801

$  22.95

31.89

35.16

95.13

103.21

5.8

4.9

7.1

0.3

1.2

At March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, options were exercisable for 2,531, 3,254 and 3,334 shares, respectively, and the 
weighted-average exercise prices were $54.04, $69.07 and $73.60, respectively. Stock options exercisable at March 31, 
2014, have a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 3.0 years. At March 31, 2014, the aggregate intrinsic value of 
options exercisable was $31,180.

90

Legg MasonThe following information summarizes Legg Mason’s stock options exercisable at March 31, 2014: 

Exercise Price Range

$  12.65–$   25.00

    25.01–     35.00

    35.01–     94.00

    94.01–   100.00

  100.01–   134.97

Option Shares 
Exercisable

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price  
Per Share

241

1,412

7

416

455

2,531

$   21.03

31.80

35.16

95.13

103.21

The following information summarizes unvested stock options under Legg Mason’s equity incentive plans for the year 
ended March 31, 2014: 

Shares unvested at March 31, 2013

Granted

Vested

Canceled/forfeited

Shares unvested at March 31, 2014

Number  
of Shares

Weighted-Average 
Grant Date  
Fair Value

2,107

1,215

(984)

(68)

2,270

$11.65

33.64

29.66

29.73

$30.74

Unamortized compensation cost related to unvested 
options at March 31, 2014, was $16,905 and is expected to 
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.

Cash received from exercises of stock options under Legg 
Mason’s equity incentive plans was $23,818, $660 and 
$2,851 for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 
2012, respectively. The tax benefit expected to be realized 
for the tax deductions from these option exercises totaled 
$1,815, $45 and $47 for the years ended March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012, respectively.

The weighted-average fair value of service-based stock 
option grants during the years ended March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012, excluding those granted to our Chief 
Executive Officer in May 2013 discussed below, using the 
Black-Scholes option pricing model, was $12.13, $9.47 and 
$13.13 per share, respectively.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used 
in the model for grants in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012:

Expected dividend yield

Risk-free interest rate

2014

1.54%

0.80%

2013

1.44%

0.81%

2012

1.39%

1.95%

Expected volatility

45.08%

51.80%

47.16%

Expected life (in years)

4.93

5.02

5.12

In May 2013, Legg Mason awarded options to purchase 
500 shares of Legg Mason, Inc. common stock at an 
exercise price of $31.46, equal to the then current market 
value of Legg Mason’s common stock, to its Chief 
Executive Officer, which is included in the outstanding 
options table. The award had a grant date fair value of 
$5,525 and is subject to vesting requirements, 25% of 
which vests over a two-year service period; 25% of which 
vests over a two-year service period and is subject to 
Legg Mason’s common stock price equaling or exceeding 
$36.46 for 20 consecutive trading days; 25% of which is 
subject to Legg Mason’s common stock price equaling 
or exceeding $41.46 for 20 consecutive trading days; and 
25% of which is subject to Legg Mason’s common stock 
price equaling or exceeding $46.46 for 20 consecutive 
trading days; as well as a requirement that certain shares 
received upon exercise are retained for a two-year period. 
In January 2014, 25% of this award vested when the 
Legg Mason stock price met and exceeded $41.46 for 20 
consecutive trading days.

The weighted-average fair value per share for these 
awards of $11.05 was estimated as of the grant date using 
a grant price of $31.46, and a Monte Carlo option pricing 
model with the following assumptions:

Legg Mason uses an equally weighted combination of 
both implied and historical volatility to measure expected 
volatility for calculating Black-Scholes option values.

Expected dividend yield

Risk-free interest rate

Expected volatility

1.48%

0.86%

44.05%

91

Legg MasonRestricted Stock
Restricted stock and restricted stock unit transactions during the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are 
summarized below:

Unvested shares at March 31, 2011

Granted

Vested

Canceled/forfeited

Unvested shares at March 31, 2012

Granted

Vested

Canceled/forfeited

Unvested shares at March 31, 2013

Granted

Vested

Canceled/forfeited

Unvested shares at March 31, 2014

Number  
of Shares

Weighted-Average 
Grant Date Value

2,637

1,370

(1,075)

(59)

2,873

2,185

(1,177)

(143)

3,738

1,369

(1,622)

(151)

3,334

$33.01

33.48

31.49

32.68

33.83

24.04

31.22

58.30

27.99

35.66

28.66

29.04

$30.77

The restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards were 
non-cash transactions. In fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, 
Legg Mason recognized $48,263, $46,351 and $32,826, 
respectively, in compensation expense and related tax 
benefits of $18,575, $17,697 and $12,705, respectively, 
for restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. 
Unamortized compensation cost related to unvested 
restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards for 3,334 
shares not yet recognized at March 31, 2014, was $63,479 
and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average 
period of 1.7 years.

In connection with the change in Legg Mason’s Chief 
Executive Officer in September 2012, 325 shares of 
restricted stock were granted to certain executives and 
key employees, with an aggregate value of $8,400. 
In March 2013, the vesting of 85 of these shares was 
accelerated. The remaining shares vested on March 31, 
2014. Compensation expense for the year ended March 
31, 2013, includes approximately $6,400 of accelerated 
stock-based net compensation costs associated with the 
departure of Legg Mason executive officers during fiscal 
2013, of which $1,400 relates to the accelerated vesting of 
shares in March 2013. 

On January 28, 2008, the Legg Mason Compensation 
Committee approved grants to senior officers of 120 
market-based performance shares. During fiscal 2013, 
the remaining 100 shares from this award were forfeited 
resulting in no outstanding balance as of March 31, 2013.

Other
Legg Mason has a qualified Employee Stock Purchase 
Plan covering substantially all U.S. employees. Shares 
of common stock are purchased in the open market on 
behalf of participating employees, subject to a 4,500 total 
share limit under the plan. Purchases are made through 
payroll deductions and, effective January 2014, Legg 
Mason provides a 15% contribution towards purchases, 
which is charged to earnings. Prior to January 2014, Legg 
Mason’s contribution was 10%. During the fiscal years 
ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, approximately 85, 
107, and 107 shares, respectively, have been purchased in 
the open market on behalf of participating employees. In 
fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, Legg Mason recognized $315, 
$238 and $267, respectively, in compensation expense 
related to the stock purchase plan.

In June 2013, Legg Mason implemented a management 
equity plan and granted units to key employees of 
Permal that entitle them to participate in 15% of the 
future growth of the Permal enterprise value (subject to 
appropriate discounts), if any, subsequent to the grant 
date. On March 31, 2014, a similar management equity 
plan was implemented by Legg Mason with a grant 
to certain key employees of ClearBridge. Independent 
valuations determined the aggregate cost of the awards 
to be approximately $9,000 and $16,000 for Permal and 
ClearBridge, respectively, which will be recognized as 
Compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements 
of Income (Loss) over the related vesting periods, through 

92

Legg MasonDecember 2017 and March 2019, respectively. Both 
arrangements provide that one-half of the respective 
cost will be absorbed by the affiliate’s incentive pool. 
Compensation expense related to the Permal management 
equity plan was $2,270 for the year ended March 31, 2014.

Legg Mason also has an equity plan for non-employee 
directors. Under the current equity plan, directors may elect 
to receive shares of stock or restricted stock units. Prior to a 
July 19, 2007 amendment to the Plan, directors could also 
elect to receive stock options. Options granted under the 
old plan are immediately exercisable at a price equal to the 
market value of the shares on the date of grant and have a 
term of not more than ten years. In fiscal 2014, 2013 and 
2012, Legg Mason recognized expense of $1,950, $1,250 
and $1,375, respectively, for awards under this plan. Shares, 
options, and restricted stock units issuable under the equity 
plan are limited to 625 shares in aggregate, of which 360 
shares were issued under the plan as of March 31, 2014. As 
of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 non-employee directors 
held 32, 112 and 184, stock options, respectively, which are 
included in the outstanding options table. As of March 31, 
2014, 2013 and 2012, non-employee directors held 64, 91 
and 74 restricted stock units, respectively, which vest on 
the grant date and are, therefore, not included in the 
unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock 
units in the table above. During the year ended March 31, 
2014, there were 39 restricted stock units distributed and 
non-employee directors did not exercise any stock options. 
During the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, non-
employee directors did not exercise any stock options and 
no restricted stock units were distributed. During the years 
ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, non-employee 
directors were granted 12, 17 and 12 restricted stock units 
and 47, 35 and 31 shares of common stock, respectively. 
For the year ended March 31, 2014, there were 26 stock 
options canceled or forfeited from the current equity plan 
for non-employee directors. For the years ended March 31, 
2013 and 2012, there were no stock options canceled or 
forfeited from the current equity plan for non-employee 
directors. For the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 
2012, there were 54, 72 and 36 stock options canceled or 
forfeited, respectively, related to a prior equity plan for non-
employee directors which was discontinued in July 2005.

During fiscal 2012, Legg Mason established a long-term 
incentive plan (the “LTIP”) under its equity incentive plan, 
which provided an additional element of compensation 
to executives that is based on performance, determined 
as the achievement of a pre-defined amount of Legg 
Mason’s cumulative adjusted earnings per share over the 
respective performance periods. Under the LTIP, current 
executive officers were granted cash value performance 
units in the quarters ended June 2011 and September 

2012 for target amounts up to $1,850 in each period. 
Awards granted under the LTIP that vest may be settled in 
cash and/or shares of Legg Mason common stock, at the 
discretion of Legg Mason. The estimated payout amounts 
of the awards, if any, are expensed over the future 
vesting periods based on a probability assessment of the 
expected outcome under the LTIP provisions. The June 
2011 grant performance period ended March 31, 2014, 
and no cash and/or shares were due. The September 2012 
grant performance period ends March 31, 2015 and no 
further grants are intended.

Deferred compensation payable in shares of Legg Mason 
common stock has been granted to certain employees 
in an elective plan. The vesting in the plan is immediate 
and the plan provides for discounts of up to 10% on 
contributions and dividends. There are 327 additional 
shares reserved for future issuance under the plan. In 
fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, Legg Mason recognized $160, 
$165 and $191, respectively, in compensation expense 
related to this plan. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, 
Legg Mason issued 51, 71 and 68 shares, respectively, 
under the plan with a weighted-average fair value per 
share at the grant date of $31.90, $23.07 and $27.05, 
respectively. The undistributed shares issued under this 
plan are held in a rabbi trust. Assets of the rabbi trust are 
consolidated with those of the employer, and the value of 
the employer’s stock held in the rabbi trust is classified in 
stockholders’ equity and accounted for in a manner similar 
to treasury stock. Therefore, the shares Legg Mason has 
issued to its rabbi trust and the corresponding liability 
related to the deferred compensation plan are presented 
as components of stockholders’ equity as Employee stock 
trust and Deferred compensation employee stock trust, 
respectively. Shares held by the trust at March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012, were 672, 726 and 690, respectively.

12.  EARNINGS PER SHARE 
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing Net Income (Loss) 
Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. by the weighted-
average number of shares outstanding. The calculation of 
weighted-average shares includes common shares and 
unvested restricted shares deemed to be participating 
securities. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS, but adjusts 
for the effect of potentially issuable common shares, 
except when inclusion is antidilutive. For periods where 
a net loss attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. is reported, 
the inclusion of potentially issuable common shares will 
decrease the net loss per share. Since this would be 
antidilutive, such shares are excluded from the calculation.

In May 2012, as part of a capital plan, Legg Mason’s Board 
of Directors authorized $1,000,000 for additional purchases 
of Legg Mason common stock, as well as the completion 

93

Legg Masonof the remaining $155,000 of a previously authorized share 
repurchase program. The capital plan authorizes using up to 
65% of cash generated from future operations to purchase 
shares of Legg Mason common stock.

During the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 
2012, Legg Mason purchased and retired 9,677, 16,199 
and 13,597 shares of its common stock, respectively, 
for $359,996, $425,475 and $400,266, through open 
market purchases. The fiscal 2013 purchases completed 
the repurchase of its common stock under the previous 
authorization and included approximately $270,000 of 
purchases under the new authorization. These repurchases 

reduced weighted-average shares outstanding by 4,908, 
8,449, and 9,716 shares for the years ended March 31, 
2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The par value of the 
shares repurchased is charged to common stock, with the 
excess of the purchase price over par first charged against 
additional paid-in capital, with the remaining balance, if any, 
charged against retained earnings.

In June 2011, Legg Mason issued 1,830 shares of 
common stock upon the exercise of purchase contracts on 
the remaining outstanding Equity Units. Of these shares, 
1,380 shares are included in weighted-average shares 
outstanding for the year ended March 31, 2012. 

The following table presents the computations of basic and diluted EPS:

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding

Potential common shares:

Employee stock options

Weighted-average diluted shares(1)

Net income (Loss)

Less: Net income (Loss) Attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

Net Income (Loss) per share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.  

common shareholders

Basic

Diluted

(1)  Diluted shares are the same as basic shares for periods with a net loss.

The diluted EPS calculations for the years ended March 
31, 2014 and 2013, exclude any potential common shares 
issuable under the 14,205 warrants issued in connection 
with the repurchase of the 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes 
in May 2012 because the market price of Legg Mason 
common stock did not exceed the exercise price, and 
therefore, the warrants would be antidilutive. The diluted 
EPS calculations for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 
2012, exclude any potential common shares issuable under 
the 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes because the market 
price of Legg Mason common stock had not exceeded 
the price at which conversion would be dilutive using the 
treasury stock method. Also, at March 31, 2012, warrants 
issued in connection with the convertible note hedge 
transactions associated with the issuance of the 2.5% 
Convertible Senior Notes are excluded from the calculation 
of diluted EPS because the effect would be antidilutive.

Options to purchase 2,620 and 5,239 shares for the years 
ended March 31, 2014 and 2012, respectively, were 
not included in the computation of diluted EPS because 
the presumed proceeds from exercising such options, 

94

Years Ended March 31

2014

121,941

442

122,383

$281,836

(2,948)

$284,784

  2013

133,226

—

133,226

$(359,748)

(6,421)

$(353,327)

2012

143,292

57

143,349

$231,031

10,214

$220,817

$       2.34

$       2.33

$ 

$ 

   (2.65)

   (2.65)

$ 

$ 

   1.54

   1.54

including the related income tax benefits, exceed the 
average price of the common shares for the period and 
therefore the options are deemed antidilutive. Further, 
market-based options are excluded from potential 
dilution until the designated market condition is met. 
The diluted EPS calculation for the year ended March 31, 
2013, excludes 5,730 potential common shares that are 
antidilutive due to the net loss for the fiscal year.

13.  ACCUMULATED OTHER  

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Accumulated other comprehensive income includes 
cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and 
net of tax, gains and losses on investment securities. The 
change in the accumulated translation adjustments for 
fiscal 2014 and 2013, primarily resulted from the impact 
of changes in the Brazilian real, the Australian dollar, the 
Japanese yen, and the British pound in relation to the 
U.S. dollar on the net assets of Legg Mason’s subsidiaries 
in Brazil, Australia, Japan, and the U.K., for which the 
real, the Australian dollar, the yen, and the pound are the 
functional currencies, respectively.

Legg MasonA summary of Legg Mason’s accumulated other comprehensive income as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, is as follows: 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

Unrealized gains on investment securities, net of tax provision of $76 and $187, respectively

Total

2014

$37,835

114

$37,949

2013

$47,259

280

$47,539

There were no significant amounts reclassified from 
Accumulated other comprehensive income to the 
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years 
ended March 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012.

14.  DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING 
The disclosures below detail Legg Mason’s derivatives and 
hedging activities excluding the derivatives and hedging 
activities of CIVs. See Note 17, Variable Interest Entities 
and Consolidation of Investment Vehicles, for information 
related to the derivatives and hedging of CIVs.

Legg Mason uses currency forwards to economically 
hedge the risk of movements in exchange rates, primarily 
between the U.S. dollar, British pound, Japanese yen, 
Australian dollar, euro, Singapore dollar, Chinese yuan, 
Indonesian rupiah, Malaysian ringgit, Philippine peso, Thai 

baht and South Korean won. In the Consolidated Balance 
Sheets, Legg Mason nets the fair value of certain foreign 
currency forwards or futures contracts executed with 
the same counterparty where Legg Mason has both the 
legal right and intent to settle the contracts on a net basis, 
resulting in net Other assets of $1,249 and $1,158 as of 
March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Legg Mason has 
not designated any derivatives as hedging instruments for 
accounting purposes during the periods ended March 31, 
2014 and 2013.

Legg Mason also uses market hedges on certain seed 
capital investments by entering into futures contracts to 
sell index funds that benchmark the hedged seed capital 
investments. Open futures contracts required cash 
collateral of $12,985 and $7,131 as of March 31, 2014 and 
2013, respectively. 

The following table presents the fair values as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, of derivative instruments not designated for 
accounting purposes as hedging instruments, classified as Other assets and Other liabilities:

Currency forward contracts

Futures and forward contracts

Total

2014

Assets

$3,271

      313

$3,584

Liabilities

$   825

   1,510

$2,335

2013

Liabilities

$101

680

$781

Assets

$1,496

      443

$1,939

The following table presents gains (losses) recognized on derivative instruments for the years ended March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012. As described above, the currency, futures and forward contracts included below are economic hedges 
of interest rate and market risk of certain operating and investing activities of Legg Mason. Gains and losses on these 
derivatives substantially offset gains and losses of the hedged items. 

Income Statement Classification

Gains

Losses

Gains

Losses

Gains

Losses

2014

2013

2012

Currency forward contracts for:

Operating activities

Other expense

$7,098

$  (2,617)

$3,650

$(1,858) $  5,604 $(3,159)

Seed capital investments

Other non-operating income (expense)

        56      (1,719)

  1,090

      (380)

       431       (351)

Futures and forward contracts  

for seed capital investments Other non-operating income (expense)

   2,471    (19,403)

  1,914

   (5,597)

    5,684

  (4,560)

Total

$9,625 $(23,739)

$6,654

$(7,835) $11,719 $(8,070)

95

Legg Mason15.  RESTRUCTURING 
In May 2010, Legg Mason announced a plan to streamline 
its business model to drive increased profitability and growth 
that primarily involved transitioning certain shared services 
to its investment affiliates which are closer to actual client 
relationships. This plan involved headcount reductions in 
operations, technology, and other administrative areas, 
which were partially offset by headcount increases at the 
affiliates, and enabled Legg Mason to eliminate a portion 
of its corporate office space that was primarily dedicated 
to operations and technology employees. The initiative was 
completed as of March 31, 2012.

Total transition-related costs were $127,500, including 
non-cash charges of $30,841, through completion of the 
plan in March 2012. Of the total transition-related costs 
incurred, $79,686 were related to charges for employee 

termination benefits and retention incentives during the 
transition period, and were recorded in Transition-related 
compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Income 
(Loss). The remainder represents other costs, including 
charges for consolidating leased office space, early 
contract terminations, asset disposals, and professional 
fees, which were recorded in the appropriate operating 
expense classifications. Charges for transition-related 
costs were $73,066 and $54,434 for the years ended 
March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which primarily 
represent costs for lease loss accruals and fixed asset 
accelerated depreciation related to space permanently 
abandoned, as well as costs for severance and retention 
incentives. There were no charges for transition-related 
costs associated with this initiative for the years ended 
March 31, 2014 or 2013.

The table below presents a summary of changes in the transition-related liability from March 31, 2011 through March 31, 2014:

Balance as of March 31, 2011

Accrued charges

Payments

Balance as of March 31, 2012

Payments and other

Balance as of March 31, 2013

Payments and other

Balance as of March 31, 2014

Severance 
and Retention 
Incentives

$ 23,211

29,096

(51,140)

1,167

(1,167)

—

—

Lease Loss 
Accruals  
and Other(1)

$   5,835

25,916(2)

(16,121)

15,630

(10,744)

4,886

(3,276)

Total

$ 29,046

55,012

(67,261)

16,797

(11,911)

4,886

(3,276)

$         —

$   1,610

$   1,610

(1)  Amounts related to the lease reserve liability are also included in Note 8.
(2)  Includes lease loss accruals of $17,983 for space permanently abandoned.

See Note 2 for information regarding restructuring and 
transition costs associated with the planned integration over 
time of two existing affiliates, Batterymarch and LMGAA, in 
conjunction with the acquisition of QS Investors.

16.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Legg Mason is a global asset management company that 
provides investment management and related services 
to a wide array of clients. The company operates in one 
reportable business segment, Global Asset Management. 
Global Asset Management provides investment advisory 
services to institutional and individual clients and to 

company-sponsored investment funds. The primary 
sources of revenue in Global Asset Management are 
investment advisory, distribution and administrative fees, 
which typically are calculated as a percentage of the 
AUM and vary based upon factors such as the type of 
underlying investment product and the type of services 
that are provided. In addition, performance fees may be 
earned under certain investment advisory contracts for 
exceeding performance benchmarks.

Revenues by geographic location are primarily based on 
the geographic location of the advisor or the domicile of 
fund families managed by Legg Mason.

96

Legg MasonThe table below reflects our revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region as of March 31:

OPERATING REVENUES

United States

United Kingdom

Other International

Total

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET AND GOODWILL

United States

United Kingdom

Other International

Total

2014

2013

2012

$1,874,328

$1,800,539

$1,806,990

436,542

430,887

387,966

424,145

448,863

406,721

$2,741,757

$2,612,650

$2,662,574

$3,127,654

$3,139,050

$3,548,628

879,946

404,696

895,767

411,910

1,108,297

474,986

$4,412,296

$4,446,727

$5,131,911

17.   VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND 

CONSOLIDATION OF INVESTMENT VEHICLES 

As further discussed in Notes 1 and 3, in accordance 
with financial accounting standards on consolidation, 
Legg Mason consolidates and separately identifies 
certain sponsored investment vehicles as CIVs, the most 
significant of which is a CLO. Legg Mason has concluded 
that it was the primary beneficiary of one of three CLOs 
in which it has a variable interest. As of March 31, 2014, 
2013 and 2012, the balances related to this CLO were 
consolidated and reported as a CIV in the Company’s 
consolidated financial statements. In addition, Legg Mason 
concluded it was the primary beneficiary of one sponsored 
investment fund VIE, which was consolidated (and 
designated a CIV) as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 
despite significant third party investments in this product. 

As of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason also concluded it was 
the primary beneficiary of 16 employee-owned funds it 
sponsors, which were consolidated and reported as CIVs. 
Finally, Legg Mason held a longer-term controlling financial 
interest in one sponsored investment fund VRE, which has 
third-party investors and was consolidated and included as 
a CIV as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Legg Mason’s investment in CIVs as of March 31, 2014 
and 2013, was $39,434 and $39,056, respectively, which 
represents its maximum risk of loss, excluding uncollected 
advisory fees. The assets of these CIVs are primarily 
comprised of investment securities. Investors and 
creditors of these CIVs have no recourse to the general 
credit or assets of Legg Mason beyond its investment in 
these funds.

97

Legg MasonThe following tables reflect the impact of CIVs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, 
and the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

Consolidating Balance Sheets

March 31, 2014

March 31, 2013

Balance before 
Consolidation 
of CIVs

CIVs

Eliminations

Consolidated 
Totals

Balance before 
Consolidation 
of CIVs

CIVs

Eliminations

Consolidated 
Totals

Current assets

$2,032,827

$138,537

$(42,981)

$2,128,383

$1,908,932

$  73,320

$(39,390)

$1,942,862

Non-current assets

4,950,948

32,018

—

4,982,966

5,115,181

211,617

—

5,326,798

Total assets

$6,983,775

$170,555

$(42,981)

$7,111,349

$7,024,113

$284,937

$(39,390)

$7,269,660

$   735,737

$  89,055

$  (3,547)

$   821,245

$   692,261

$  10,539

$     (334)

$   702,466

Current liabilities

Long-term debt  

of CIVs

Other non-current 

liabilities

1,520,236

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

207,835

1,520,236

1,517,069

2,930

—

—

207,835

1,519,999

Total liabilities

Redeemable 

non-controlling 
interests

Total stockholders’ 

equity

Total liabilities and 

2,255,973

89,055

(3,547)

2,341,481

2,209,330

221,304

(334)

2,430,300

3,172

26,325

15,647

45,144

1,355

—

19,654

21,009

4,724,630

55,175

(55,081)

4,724,724

4,813,428

63,633

(58,710)

4,818,351

equity

$6,983,775

$170,555

$(42,981)

$7,111,349

$7,024,113

$284,937

$(39,390)

$7,269,660

98

Legg MasonConsolidating Statements of Income (Loss)

Total operating revenues

Total operating expenses

Operating income (loss)

Total other non-operating income (expense)

Income before income tax provision (benefit)

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net income

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Year Ended March 31, 2014

Balance before 
Consolidation of CIVs

CIVs

Eliminations

As Reported

$2,743,707

2,310,444

433,263

(10,333)

422,930

137,805

285,125

341

$       —

2,376

(2,376)

2,445

69

—

69

—

$(1,950)

(1,956)

6

(3,364)

(3,358)

—

(3,358)

(3,289)

$2,741,757

2,310,864

430,893

(11,252)

419,641

137,805

281,836

(2,948)

Net income attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

$   284,784

$        69

$      (69)

$   284,784

Total operating revenues

Total operating expenses

Operating income (loss)

Total other non-operating income (expense)

Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net income (loss)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Balance before 
Consolidation of CIVs

$2,615,047

3,046,587

(431,540)

(72,177)

(503,717)

(150,859)

(352,858)

469

Year Ended March 31, 2013

CIVs

$       —

2,965

(2,965)

(2,864)

(5,829)

—

(5,829)

—

Eliminations

As Reported

$(2,397)

(2,403)

6

(1,067)

(1,061)

—

(1,061)

(6,890)

$2,612,650

3,047,149

(434,499)

(76,108)

(510,607)

(150,859)

(359,748)

(6,421)

Net income (loss) attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

$  (353,327)

$(5,829)

$ 5,829

$  (353,327)

Total operating revenues

Total operating expenses

Operating income (loss)

Total other non-operating income (expense)

Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net income (loss)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Balance before 
Consolidation of CIVs

$2,665,668

2,323,213

342,455

(49,236)

293,219

72,052

221,167

350

Net income (loss) attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

$   220,817

Year Ended March 31, 2012

CIVs

$        —

3,709

(3,709)

18,336

14,627

—

14,627

—

$14,627

Eliminations

As Reported

$  (3,094)

$2,662,574

(3,101)

2,323,821

7

(4,770)

(4,763)

—

(4,763)

9,864

338,753

(35,670)

303,083

72,052

231,031

10,214

$(14,627)

$   220,817

Other non-operating income (expense) includes interest income, interest expense and net gains (losses) on investments 
and long-term debt determined on an accrual basis.

The consolidation of CIVs has no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

99

Legg MasonThe fair value of the financial assets and (liabilities) of CIVs were determined using the following categories of inputs:

Quoted Prices  
in Active  
Markets  
(Level 1)

Significant  
Other  
Observable  
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Significant  
Unobservable  
Inputs  
(Level 3)

Value as of  
March 31,  
2014

$  1,110

27,524

28,634

—

$28,634

$        —

—

$        —

$  3,941

—

3,941

—

$  3,941

$        —

(1,888)

$(1,888)

$  17,888

—

17,888

31,810

$  49,698

$(79,179)

—

$(79,179)

$  22,939

27,524

50,463

31,810

$  82,273

$(79,179)

(1,888)

$(81,067)

Quoted Prices 
in Active  
Markets  
(Level 1)

Significant  
Other  
Observable  
Inputs  
(Level 2)

Significant 
Unobservable  
Inputs  
(Level 3)

Value as of  
March 31,  
2013

$2,076

$     3,268

$   19,448

$   24,792

—

—

—

—

$2,076

$      —

—

$      —

172,519

11,052

—

183,571

$186,839

$          —

(2,930)

$   (2,930)

—

—

26,982

26,982

$   46,430

$(207,835)

—

$(207,835)

172,519

11,052

26,982

210,553

$ 235,345

$(207,835)

(2,930)

$(210,765)

ASSETS:

Trading investments:

Hedge funds

Proprietary funds

Total trading investments

Investments:

Private equity funds

LIABILITIES:

CLO debt

Derivative liabilities

ASSETS:

Trading investments:

Hedge funds

Investments:

CLO loans

CLO bonds

Private equity funds

Total investments

LIABILITIES:

CLO debt

Derivative liabilities

100

Legg MasonExcept for the CLO debt, substantially all of the above financial instruments where valuation methods rely on other than 
observable market inputs as a significant input utilize the NAV practical expedient, such that measurement uncertainty 
has little relevance. In April 2014, the CLO was completing its wind-down for the subsequent distribution of cash to 
settle its liabilities. As of March 31, 2014, the carrying value of the CLO debt approximated the amount to be paid to 
investors, and there was no appreciable measurement uncertainty. The following table provides a summary of qualitative 
information relating to the valuation of CLO debt as of March 31, 2013:

Value as of  
March 31, 2013

Valuation technique

Unobservable input

Range (weighted-average)

$(207,835)

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

Default rate

1.1%–11.0%  (2.3%)

3.0%–4.0%  (3.5%) 

Constant prepayment rate

25.0%

The changes in assets and (liabilities) of CIVs measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the 
years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are presented in the table below:

Value as of 
March 31, 
2013

Purchases

Sales

Settlements/
Other

Transfers

Realized and 
Unrealized 
Gains/
(Losses), Net

Value as of 
March 31, 
2014

ASSETS:

Hedge funds

$   19,448

$3,516

$(8,037)

$          —

Private equity funds

26,982

1,811

—

—

$   46,430

$5,327

$(8,037)

$          —

$ —

  —

$ —

$ 2,961

3,017

$ 5,978

$ 17,888

31,810

$ 49,698

LIABILITIES:

CLO debt

Total realized and unrealized  

gains (losses), net

ASSETS:

Hedge funds

Private equity funds

LIABILITIES:

CLO debt

Total realized and unrealized  

gains (losses), net

$(207,835)

$      —

$       —

$133,047

$ —

$(4,391)

$(79,179)

Value as of 
March 31, 
2012

Purchases

Sales

Settlements/
Other

Transfers

$ 1,587

Realized and 
Unrealized 
Gains/
(Losses), Net

Value as of 
March 31, 
2013

$   24,116

25,071

$   49,187

$1,980

2,622

$4,602

$(6,602)

$        —

(2,030)

—

$(8,632)

$        —

$ —

  —

$ —

$       (46)

$  19,448

1,319

26,982

$   1,273

$  46,430

$(271,707)

$      —

$       —

$75,798

$ —

$(11,926)

$(207,835)

$(10,653)

101

Legg MasonRealized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for Level 3 assets and liabilities of CIVs are included in Other non-
operating income (expense) of CIVs on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Total unrealized losses for Level 3 
investments and liabilities of CIVs relating only to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date were $2,284 
and $11,842 for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during either of the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

The NAVs used as a practical expedient by CIVs have been provided by the investees and have been derived from the fair 
values of the underlying investments as of the respective reporting dates. The following table summarizes, as of March 
31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, the nature of these investments and any related liquidation restrictions or other factors 
which may impact the ultimate value realized:

Category of 
Investment

Hedge funds

Investment Strategy

Global macro, fixed income, long/short 
equity, systematic, emerging market,  
U.S. and European hedge

Fair Value Determined Using NAV

As of March 31, 2014

March 31,  
2014

March 31,  
2013

Unfunded 
Commitments

Remaining 
Term

   $22,939(1)

   $24,792(2)

n/a

n/a

Private equity funds

Long/short equity

Total

     31,810(3)

     26,982(3)

$54,749

$51,774

$2,707

$2,707

4 years

n/a—not applicable
(1)  10% daily redemption; 6% monthly redemption; 2% quarterly redemption; and 82% are subject to three to five year lock-up or side pocket provisions.
(2)  11% daily redemption; 8% monthly redemption; 2% quarterly redemption; and 79% are subject to three to five year lock-up or side pocket provisions.
(3)  Liquidations are expected over the remaining term.

There are no current plans to sell any of these investments held as of March 31, 2014.

Legg Mason has elected the fair value option for certain eligible assets and liabilities, including corporate loans and debt, 
of the consolidated CLO. Management believes that the use of the fair value option mitigates the impact of certain timing 
differences and better matches the changes in fair value of assets and liabilities related to the CLO.

The following table presents the fair value and unpaid principal balance of CLO loans, bonds and debt carried at fair value 
under the fair value option as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013:

CLO loans and bonds

Unpaid principal balance

Unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

Fair value

CLO debt

Principal amounts outstanding

Excess unpaid principal over fair value

Fair value

March 31, 2014

March 31, 2013

$        —

—

$        —

$  92,114

(12,935)

$  79,179

$186,839

(3,268)

$183,571

$225,161

(17,326)

$207,835

During the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, total net losses of $5,914 and $8,455, respectively, were recognized 
in Other non-operating income (loss) of CIVs in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) related to assets and 
liabilities for which the fair value option was elected. CLO loans and CLO debt measured at fair value have floating interest 
rates, therefore, substantially all of the estimated gains and losses included in earnings for the years ended March 31, 
2014 and 2013, were attributable to instrument specific credit risk.

102

Legg MasonThe CLO debt bears interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a pre-defined spread, which ranges from 25 basis 
points to 400 basis points. All outstanding debt matures on July 15, 2018. The CLO commenced its wind-down in July 
2012, such that proceeds from securities cannot be reinvested and are applied to reduce the debt outstanding in the 
quarter subsequent to receipt, after other required payments. As noted above, the CLO was completing its wind-down in 
April 2014.

Total derivative liabilities of CIVs of $1,888 and $2,930 as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are recorded in 
Other liabilities of CIVs. Gains and (losses) of $1,311 and $(1,537), respectively, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 
and $942 and $(1,223), respectively, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, related to derivative liabilities of CIVs are 
included in Other non-operating income (loss) of CIVs. There is no risk to Legg Mason in relation to the derivative assets 
and liabilities of the CIVs in excess of its investment in the funds, if any.

As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, for VIEs in which Legg Mason holds a variable interest or is the sponsor and holds a 
variable interest, but for which it was not the primary beneficiary, Legg Mason’s carrying value and maximum risk of loss 
were as follows:

CLOs

Real Estate Investment Trust

Other sponsored investment funds

Total

As of March 31, 2014

As of March 31, 2013

Equity Interests on 
the Consolidated 
Balance Sheet(1)

Maximum Risk 
of Loss(2)

Equity Interests on 
the Consolidated 
Balance Sheet(1)

Maximum Risk 
of Loss(2)

$        —

1,442

34,126

$35,568

$      911

3,715

78,521

$83,147

$        —

989

43,104

$44,093

$      496

2,644

87,121

$90,261

(1)  Includes $23,404 and $33,918 related to investments in proprietary funds products as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(2)  Includes equity investments the Company has made or is required to make and any earned but uncollected management fees.

The Company’s total AUM of unconsolidated VIEs was $16,032,764 and $17,090,267 as of March 31, 2014  
and 2013, respectively. 

The assets of these VIEs are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, and the 
liabilities are primarily comprised of debt and various expense accruals. These VIEs are not consolidated because either 
(1) Legg Mason does not have the power to direct significant economic activities of the entity and rights/obligations 
associated with benefits/losses that could be significant to the entity, or (2) Legg Mason does not absorb a majority of 
each VIE’s expected losses or does not receive a majority of each VIE’s expected residual gains.

103

Legg MasonQuarterly Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
(Unaudited)

Fiscal 2014(1)

Operating Revenues

Operating Expenses

Operating Income

Other Non-Operating Income (Expense)

Income before Income Tax Provision

Income tax provision

Net Income

Less: Net income (Loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Quarter Ended

  Mar. 31

$681,396

  Dec. 31

$720,092

562,055

119,341

(7,393)

111,948

46,856

65,092

(3,855)

598,440

121,652

4,303

125,955

46,004

79,951

(1,783)

 Sept. 30

$669,852

563,486

106,366

485

106,851

19,153

87,698

1,410

 June 30

$670,417

586,883

83,534

(8,647)

74,887

25,792

49,095

1,280

Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

$  68,947

$  81,734

$   86,288

$  47,815

Net Income per Share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.  

common shareholders:

Basic

Diluted

Cash dividend per share

Stock price range:

High

Low

Assets Under Management (in millions):

End of period
Average

$       0.58

$     0.68

$       0.70

$      0.38

0.58

0.13

49.50

39.60

0.67

0.13

44.09

32.44

0.70

0.13

35.85

30.28

0.38

0.13

37.04

29.28

$701,774

689,003

$679,475

670,019

$656,023

650,428

$644,511

654,737

(1)  Due to rounding of quarterly results, total amounts for fiscal year may differ immaterially from the annual results.

As of May 20, 2014, the closing price of Legg Mason’s common stock was $48.11.

Fiscal 2013(1)

Operating Revenues

Operating Expenses

Operating Income (Loss)

Other Non-Operating Income (Expense)

Income (Loss) before Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net Income (Loss)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Quarter Ended

   Mar. 31

$667,763

624,750

    Dec. 31

$   673,900

1,307,223

  Sept. 30

$640,295

560,561

   June 30

$630,692

554,615

43,013

5,633

48,646

17,955

30,691

1,487

(633,323)

(5,441)

(638,764)

(180,214)

(458,550)

(4,680)

79,734

17,758

97,492

16,397

81,095

298

76,077

(94,058)

(17,981)

(4,997)

(12,984)

(3,526)

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.

$  29,204

$  (453,870)

$   80,797

$   (9,458)

Net Income (Loss) per share attributable to Legg Mason, Inc.  

common shareholders:

Basic

Diluted

Cash dividend per share

Stock price range:

High

Low

Assets Under Management (in millions):

End of period
Average

$      0.23

$        (3.45)

$       0.60

$     (0.07)

0.23

0.11

32.59

25.43

(3.45)

0.11

26.63

23.88

0.60

0.11

27.14

23.31

(0.07)

0.11

28.47

22.36

$664,609

657,357

$648,879

648,354

$650,700

639,389

$631,823

635,463

(1)  Due to rounding of quarterly results, total amounts for fiscal year may differ immaterially from the annual results.

104

Legg MasonExecutive Officers

Corporate Data

Joseph A. Sullivan
President and Chief Executive Officer

Peter H. Nachtwey
Senior Executive Vice President and  
Chief Financial Officer

EXECUTIVE OFFICES
100 International Drive

Baltimore, Maryland 21202

(410) 539-0000

www.leggmason.com

TRANSFER AGENT
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

6201 15th Avenue 

Brooklyn, NY 11219 

(212) 936-5100 

www.amstock.com

Thomas K. Hoops
Executive Vice President and  
Head of Business Development

Terence A. Johnson
Executive Vice President and  
Head of Global Distribution

Thomas C. Merchant
Executive Vice President and  
General Counsel

Jennifer W. Murphy
Executive Vice President and  
Chief Administrative Officer

FORM 10-K
Legg Mason’s Annual Report on Form 10-K 

for fiscal 2014, filed with the Securities 

COMMON STOCK
Shares of Legg Mason, Inc. common  

and Exchange Commission and containing 

stock are listed and traded on the New  

audited financial statements, is available 

York Stock Exchange (symbol: LM).  

upon request without charge by writing to 

As of March 31, 2014, there were 1,300 

the Corporate Secretary at the Executive 

shareholders of record of the Company’s 

Offices of the Company.

common stock.

Copies can also be obtained by accessing 

our website at www.leggmason.com

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, Maryland 21202

(410) 783-7600

www.pwc.com

Total Return Performance

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Legg Mason’s common stock for the last five fiscal years with the 

cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the SNL Asset Manager Index over the same period (assuming the investment of 

$100 in each on March 31, 2009). The SNL Asset Manager Index consists of 35 asset management firms. 

E
U
L
A
V

X
E
D
N

I

400

300

200

100

0

03/31/09 

03/31/10 

03/31/11 

03/31/12 

03/31/13 

03/31/14

 LEGG MASON, INC. 

 SNL ASSET MANAGER INDEX 

 S&P 500

P E R I O D   E N D I N G

INDEX

03/31/09

03/31/10 03/31/11

03/31/12

03/31/13

03/31/14

Legg Mason, Inc.

100.00 181.10 229.31 179.55

210.15

324.97

SNL Asset Manager Index

100.00 184.57 216.01 211.14

271.17

341.34

S&P 500

100.00 149.77 173.20 187.99

214.24 261.07

Source: SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA

m
o
c
.
e
v
i
t
a
e
r
c
i
c
f
.

w
w
w

D
M

,
a
d
s
e
h
t
e
B

.
c
n

I

s
n
o

i
t
a
c
i

n
u
m
m
o
C

l
a
i
c
n
a
n

i
F
:

n
g

i
s
e
D

.
c
n

I

,

n
o
s
a
M
g
g
e
L

4
1
0
2
©

5Legg Mason 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INDEPENDENT EXPERTISE.
SINGULAR FOCUS.®

  leggmason.com

  youtube.com/leggmason

  linkedin.com/company/legg-mason

  @leggmason

L
e
g
g
M
a
s
o
n

2
0
1
4
A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t